thedcclothesline--2020-04-26--How The National Security State Is Using Coronavirus To Push AI-Driven Mass Surveillance

WASHINGTON DC ( The Last American Vagabond ) — Last year , a U.S. government body dedicated to examining how artificial intelligence can “ address the national security and defense needs of the United States ” discussed in detail the “ structural ” changes that the American economy and society must undergo in order to ensure a technological advantage over China , according to a recent document acquired through an FOIA request .
This document suggests that the U.S. follow China ’ s lead and even surpass them in many aspects related to AI-driven technologies , particularly their use of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the public rhetoric of prominent U.S. government officials and politicians on China , who have labeled the Chinese government ’ s technology investments and export of its surveillance systems and other technologies as a major “ threat ” to Americans ’ “ way of life.
” In addition , many of the steps for the implementation of such a program in the U.S. , as laid out in this newly available document , are currently being promoted and implemented as part of the government ’ s response to the current coronavirus ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the fact that many members of this same body have considerable overlap with the taskforces and advisors currently guiding the government ’ s plans to “ re-open the economy ” and efforts to use technology to respond to the current crisis .
The FOIA document , obtained by the Electronic Privacy Information Center ( EPIC ) , was produced by a little-known U.S. government organization called the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence ( NSCAI ) .
It was created by the 2018 National Defense Authorization Act ( NDAA ) and its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ methods and means necessary to advance the development of artificial intelligence ( AI ) , machine learning , and associated technologies to comprehensively address the national security and defense needs of the United States.
” The NSCAI is a key part of the government ’ s response to what is often referred to as the coming “ fourth industrial revolution , ” which has been described as “ a revolution characterized by discontinuous technological development in areas like artificial intelligence ( AI ) , big data , fifth-generation telecommunications networking ( 5G ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Internet of Things ( IoT ) , and quantum computing.
” take our poll - story continues below However , their main focus is ensuring that “ the United States … maintain a technological advantage in artificial intelligence , machine learning , and other associated technologies related to national security and defense.
” The vice-chair of NSCAI , Robert Work – former Deputy Secretary of Defense and senior fellow at the hawkish Center for a New American Security ( CNAS ) , described the commission ’ s purpose as determining “ how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ artificial intelligence , including a focus on how the government can work with industry to compete with China ’ s ‘ civil-military fusion ’ concept.
” The recently released NSCAI document is a May 2019 presentation entitled “ Chinese Tech Landscape Overview.
” Throughout the presentation , the NSCAI promotes the overhaul of the U.S. economy and way of life as necessary for allowing the U.S. to ensure it holds a considerable technological advantage over China , as losing this advantage is currently deemed a major “ national security ” issue by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about maintaining a technological advantage can be seen in several other U.S. military documents and think tank reports , several of which have warned that the U.S. ’ technological advantage is quickly eroding .
The U.S. government and establishment media outlets often blame alleged Chinese espionage or the Chinese government ’ s more explicit partnerships with private technology companies in support of their claim that the U.S. is losing this advantage over China .
For instance , Chris Darby , the current CEO of the CIA ’ s In-Q-Tel , who is also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ last year that China is the U.S. ’ main competitor in terms of technology and that U.S. privacy laws were hampering the U.S. ’ capacity to counter China in this regard , stating that : In another example , Michael Dempsey – former acting Director of National Intelligence and currently a government-funded fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations – argued in The Hill that : In fact , the national security apparatus of the United States is so concerned about losing a technological edge over China that the Pentagon recently decided to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ community in order “ to get in front of Chinese advances in artificial intelligence.
” This union resulted in the creation of the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center ( JAIC ) , which ties together “ the military ’ s efforts with those of the Intelligence Community , allowing them to combine efforts in a breakneck push to move government ’ s AI initiatives forward.
” It also coordinates with other government agencies , industry , academics , and U.S. allies .
Robert Work , who subsequently became the NSCAI vice-chair , said at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was a “ welcome first step in response to Chinese , and to a lesser extent , Russian , plans to dominate these technologies.
” Similar concerns about “ losing ” technological advantage to China have also been voiced by the NSCAI chairman , Eric Schmidt , the former head of Alphabet – Google ’ s parent company , who argued in February in the New York Times that Silicon Valley could soon lose “ the technology wars ” to China if the U.S. government doesn ’ t take action .
Thus , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ NSCAI – the intelligence community , the Pentagon and Silicon Valley – all view China ’ s advancements in AI as a major national security threat ( and in Silicon Valley ’ s case , threat to their bottom lines and market shares ) that must be tackled quickly .
In the May 2019 “ Chinese Tech Landscape Overview ” presentation , the NSCAI discusses that , while the U.S. still leads in the “ creation ” stage of AI and related technologies , it lags behind China in the “ adoption ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It says that “ creation ” , followed by “ adoption ” and “ iteration ” are the three phases of the “ life cycle of new tech ” and asserts that failing to dominate in the “ adoption ” stage will allow China to “ leapfrog ” the U.S. and dominate AI for the foreseeable future .
The presentation also argues that , in order to “ leapfrog ” competitors in emerging markets , what is needed is not “ individual brilliance ” but instead specific “ structural conditions that exist within @ @ @ @ @ @ @ studies where China is considered to be “ leapfrogging ” the U.S. due to major differences in these “ structural factors.
” Thus , the insinuation of the document ( though not directly stated ) is that the U.S. must alter the “ structural factors ” that are currently responsible for its lagging behind China in the “ adoption ” phase of AI-driven technologies .
Chief among the troublesome “ structural factors ” highlighted in this presentation are so-called “ legacy systems ” that are common in the U.S. but much less so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that examples of “ legacy systems ” include a financial system that still utilizes cash and card payments , individual car ownership and even receiving medical attention from a human doctor .
It states that , while these “ legacy systems ” in the US are “ good enough , ” too many “ good enough ” systems “ hinder the adoption of new things , ” specifically AI-driven systems .
Another structural factor deemed by the NSCAI to be an obstacle to the U.S. ’ ability to maintain a technological advantage over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consumer market , ” arguing that “ extreme urban density = on-demand service adoption.
” In other words , extreme urbanization results in more people using online or mobile-based “ on-demand ” services , ranging from ride-sharing to online shopping .
It also cites the use of mass surveillance on China ’ s “ huge population base ” is an example of how China ’ s “ scale of consumer market ” advantage allowing “ China to leap ahead ” in the fields of related technologies , like facial recognition .
In addition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ “ legacy systems ” and lack of “ extreme urban density , ” the NSCAI also calls for more “ explicit government support and involvement ” as a means to speed up the adoption of these systems in the U.S .
This includes the government lending its stores of data on civilians to train AI , specifically citing facial recognition databases , and mandating that cities be “ re-architected around AVs [ autonomous vehicles ] , ” among others .
Other examples given include the government investing large amounts of money in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a national , public-private AI taskforce focused on smart city-implementation ( among other things ) .
With regards to the latter , the document says “ this level of public-private cooperation ” in China is “ outwardly embraced ” by the parties involved , with this “ serving as a stark contrast to the controversy around Silicon Valley selling to the U.S. government.
” Examples of such controversy , from the NSCAI ’ s perspective , likely include Google employees petitioning to end the Google-Pentagon “ Project Maven , ” which uses Google @ @ @ @ @ @ @ captured by drones .
Google eventually chose not to renew its Maven contract as a result of the controversy , even though top Google executives viewed the project as a “ golden opportunity ” to collaborate more closely with the military and intelligence communities .
The document also defines another aspect of government support as the “ clearing of regulatory barriers.
” This term is used in the document specifically with respect to U.S. privacy laws , despite the fact that the U.S. national security state has long violated these laws with near @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seems to suggest that privacy laws in the U.S. should be altered so that what the U.S. government has done “ in secret ” with private citizen data can be done more openly and more extensively .
The NSCAI document also discusses the removal of “ regulatory barriers ” in order to speed up the adoption of self-driving cars , even though autonomous driving technology has resulted in several deadly and horrific car accidents and presents other safety concerns .
Also discussed is how China ’ s “ adoption advantage ” will “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in several new fields , including “ AI medical diagnosis ” and “ smart cities.
” It then asserts that “ the future will be decided at the intersection of private enterprise and policy leaders between China and the U.S. ” If this coordination over the global AI market does not occur , the document warns that “ we [ the U.S. ] risk being left out of the discussions where norms around AI are set for the rest of our lifetimes.
” The presentation also dwells considerably on how “ the main @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the domestic Chinese and US markets , ” but what it refers to as the NBU ( next billion users ) markets , where it states that “ Chinese players will aggressively challenge Silicon Valley.
” In order to challenge them more successfully , the presentation argues that , “ just like we [ view ] the market of teenagers as a harbinger for new trends , we should look at China.
” The document also expresses concerns about China exporting AI more extensively and intensively than the U.S. , saying that China @ @ @ @ @ @ @ helping to build facial databases in Zimbabwe and selling image recognition and smart city systems to Malaysia .
If allowed to become “ the unambiguous leader in AI , ” it says that “ China could end up writing much of the rulebook of international norms around the deployment of AI ” and that it would “ broaden China ’ s sphere of influence amongst an international community that increasingly looks to the pragmatic authoritarianism of China and Singapore as an alternative to Western liberal democracy.
” Given that the document makes it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the U.S. are impeding its ability to prevent China from “ leapfrogging ” ahead in AI and then dominating it for the foreseeable future , it is also important to examine what the document suggests should replace these “ legacy systems ” in the U.S. As previously mentioned , one “ legacy system ” cited early on in the presentation is the main means of payment for most Americans , cash and credit/debit cards .
The presentation asserts , in contrast to these “ legacy systems ” that the best and most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ digital wallets .
It notes specifically the main mobile wallet provider in India , PayTM , is majority owned by Chinese companies .
It quotes an article , which states that “ a big break came [ in 2016 ] when India canceled 86 % of currency in circulation in an effort to cut corruption and bring more people into the tax net by forcing them to use less cash.
” At the time , claims that India ’ s 2016 “ currency reform ” would be used as a stepping stone towards @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as “ conspiracy theory.
” However , last year , a committee convened by India ’ s central bank ( and led by an Indian tech oligarch who also created India ’ s massive civilian biometric database ) resulted in the Indian government ’ s “ Cashless India ” program .
Regarding India ’ s 2016 “ currency reform , ” the NSCAI document then asserts that “ this would be unfathomable in the West .
And unsurprisingly , when 86 % of the cash got cancelled and nobody had a credit card @ @ @ @ @ @ @ laying the groundwork for a far more advanced payments ecosystem in India than the US.
” However , it has become increasingly less unfathomable in light of the current coronavirus crisis , which has seen efforts to reduce the amount of cash used because paper bills may carry the virus as well as efforts to introduce a Federal Reserve-backed “ digital dollar.
” In addition , the NSCAI document from last May calls for the end of in-person shopping and promotes moving towards all shopping being performed online .
It argues that “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by adopting ideas from Chinese companies ” by shifting towards exclusive e-commerce purchasing options .
It states that only shopping online provides a “ great experience ” and also adds that “ when buying online is literally the only way to get what you want , consumers go online.
” Another “ legacy system ” that the NSCAI seeks to overhaul is car ownership , as it promotes autonomous , or self-driving vehicles and further asserts that “ fleet ownership > individual ownership.
” It specifically points to a need for “ a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ says “ is needed to coordinate cars to achieve near 100 % utilization rates.
” However , it warns against ride-sharing networks that “ need a human operator paired with each vehicle ” and also asserts that “ fleet ownership makes more sense ” than individual car ownership .
It also specifically calls for these fleets to not only be composed of self-driving cars , but electric cars and cites reports that China “ has the world ’ s most aggressive electric vehicle goals….and seek [ s ] the lead in an emerging @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leads in ride-sharing today even though ride-sharing was pioneered first in the U.S .
It asserts once again that the U.S. “ legacy system ” of individual car ownership and lack of “ extreme urban density ” are responsible for China ’ s dominance in this area .
It also predicts that China will “ achieve mass autonomous [ vehicle ] adoption before the U.S. , ” largely because “ the lack of mass car ownership [ in China ] leads to far more consumer receptiveness to AVs [ autonomous vehicles ] .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ mass adoption leads to a virtuous cycle that allows Chinese core self-driving tech to accelerate beyond [ its ] Western counterparts.
” In addition to their vision for a future financial system and future self-driving transport system , the NSCAI has a similarly dystopian vision for surveillance .
The document calls mass surveillance “ one of the ‘ first-and-best customers ’ for AI ” and “ a killer application for deep learning.
” It also states that “ having streets carpeted with cameras is good infrastructure.
” It then discusses how “ an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are “ collecting the bulk of their early revenue from government security contracts ” and praises the use of AI in facilitating policing activities .
For instance , it lauds reports that “ police are making convictions based on phone calls monitored with iFlyTek ’ s voice-recognition technology ” and that “ police departments are using [ AI ] facial recognition tech to assist in everything from catching traffic law violators to resolving murder cases.
” On the point of facial recognition technology specifically , the NSCAI document asserts that China has “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ facial recognition , even though “ breakthroughs in using machine learning for image recognition initially occurred in the US.
” It claims that China ’ s advantage in this instance is because they have government-implemented mass surveillance ( “ clearing of regulatory barriers ” ) , enormous government-provided stores of data ( “ explicit government support ” ) combined with private sector databases on a huge population base ( “ scale of consumer market ” ) .
As a consequence of this , the NSCAI argues , China is also set to leap @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recognition and biometrics .
The document also points to another glaring difference between the U.S. and its rival , stating that : “ In the press and politics of America and Europe , Al is painted as something to be feared that is eroding privacy and stealing jobs .
Conversely , China views it as both a tool for solving major macroeconomic challenges in order to sustain their economic miracle , and an opportunity to take technological leadership on the global stage.
” The NSCAI document also touches on the area of healthcare @ @ @ @ @ @ @ system that seems to be becoming reality thanks to the current coronavirus crisis .
In discussing the use of AI in healthcare ( almost a year before the current crisis began ) , it states that “ China could lead the world in this sector ” and “ this could lead to them exporting their tech and setting international norms.
” One reason for this is also that China has “ far too few doctors for the population ” and calls having enough doctors for in-person visits a “ legacy system.
” It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ HIPPA compliance and FDA approval ” as obstacles that don ’ t constrain Chinese authorities .
More troubling , it argues that “ the potential impact of government supplied data is even more significant in biology and healthcare , ” and says it is likely that “ the Chinese government [ will ] require every single citizen to have their DNA sequenced and stored in government databases , something nearly impossible to imagine in places as privacy conscious as the U.S. and Europe.
” It continues by saying that “ the Chinese @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and calls these civilian DNA databases a “ logical next step.
” Who Are The NSCAI ?
Given the sweeping changes to the U.S. that the NSCAI promoted in this presentation last May , it becomes important to examine who makes up the commission and to consider their influence over U.S. policy on these matters , particularly during the current crisis .
As previously mentioned , the chairman of the NSCAI is Eric Schmidt , the former head of Alphabet ( Google ’ s parent company ) who has also invested heavily in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ start-up “ incubator ” Team8 .
In addition , the committee ’ s vice-chair is Robert Work , is not only a former top Pentagon official , but is currently working with the think tank CNAS , which is run by John McCain ’ s long-time foreign policy adviser and Joe Biden ’ s former national security adviser .
Other members of the NSCAI are as follows : • Safra Catz , CEO of Oracle , with close ties to Trump ’ s top donor Sheldon Adelson • Steve Chien , supervisor of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s Jet Propulsion Lab • Ken Ford , CEO of the Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition • Jose-Marie Griffiths , president of Dakota State University and former National Science Board member • Gilman Louie , partner at Alsop Louie Partners and former CEO of In-Q-Tel • William Mark , director of SRI International and former Lockheed Martin director • Jason Matheny , director of the Center for Security and Emerging Technology , former Assistant director of National Intelligence and former director of IARPA ( Intelligence Advanced Research Project Agency ) • @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and former Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition As can be seen in the list above , there is a considerable amount of overlap between the NSCAI and the companies currently advising the White House on “ re-opening ” the economy ( Microsoft , Amazon , Google , Lockheed Martin , Oracle ) and one NSCAI member , Oracle ’ s Safra Katz , is on the White House ’ s “ economic revival ” taskforce .
Also , there is also overlap between the NSCAI and the companies that are intimately involved @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tracing ” “ coronavirus surveillance system , ” a mass surveillance system promoted by the Jared Kushner-led , private-sector coronavirus task force .
That surveillance system is set to be constructed by companies with deep ties to Google and the U.S. national security state , and both Google and Apple , who create the operating systems for the vast majority of smartphones used in the U.S. , have said they will now build that surveillance system directly into their smartphone operating systems .
Also notable is the fact that In-Q-Tel and the U.S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ NSCAI and that they also boast close ties with Google , Palantir and other Silicon Valley giants , having been early investors in those companies .
Both Google and Palantir , as well as Amazon ( also on the NSCAI ) are also major contractors for U.S. intelligence agencies .
In-Q-Tel ’ s involvement on the NSCAI is also significant because they have been heavily promoting mass surveillance of consumer electronic devices for use in pandemics for the past several years .
Much of that push has come from In-Q-Tel ’ s current @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , who was previously the director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and also co-authored several controversial biowarfare/pandemic simulations , such as Dark Winter .
In addition , since at least January , the U.S. intelligence community and the Pentagon have been at the forefront of developing the U.S. government ’ s still-classified “ 9/11-style ” response plans for the coronavirus crisis , alongside the National Security Council .
Few news organizations have noted that these classified response plans , which are set to be triggered if and when the U.S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , has been created largely by elements of the national security state ( i.e .
the NSC , Pentagon , and intelligence ) , as opposed to civilian agencies or those focused on public health issues .
Furthermore , it has been reported that the U.S. intelligence community , as well as U.S. military intelligence , knew by at least January ( though recent reports have said as early as last November ) that the coronavirus crisis would reach “ pandemic proportions ” by March .
The American public were not warned , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ political classes were apparently informed , given the record numbers of CEO resignations in January and several high-profile insider trading allegations that preceded the current crisis by a matter of weeks .
Perhaps even more disconcerting is the added fact that the U.S. government not only participated in the eerily prescient pandemic simulation last October known as Event 201 , it also led a series of pandemic response simulations last year .
Crimson Contagion was a series of four simulations that involved 19 U.S. federal agencies , including intelligence and the military , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a host of private sector companies that simulated a devastating pandemic influenza outbreak that had originated in China .
It was led by the current HHS Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response , Robert Kadlec , who is a former lobbyist for military and intelligence contractors and a Bush-era homeland security “ bioterrorism ” advisor .
In addition , both Kadlec and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security , which was intimately involved in Event 201 , have direct ties to the controversial June 2001 biowarfare exercise “ Dark Winter , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ transpired just months later in disturbing ways .
Though efforts by media and government were made to blame the anthrax attacks on a foreign source , the anthrax was later found to have originated at a U.S. bioweapons lab and the FBI investigation into the case has been widely regarded as a cover-up , including by the FBI ’ s once-lead investigator on that case .
Given the above , it is worth asking if those who share the NSCAI ’ s vision saw the coronavirus pandemic early on as an opportunity to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had deemed essential to countering China ’ s lead in the mass adoption of AI-driven technologies , especially considering that many of the changes in the May 2019 document are now quickly taking place under the guise of combatting the coronavirus crisis .
Though the May 2019 NSCAI document was authored nearly a year ago , the coronavirus crisis has resulted in the implementation of many of the changes and the removal of many of the “ structural ” obstacles that the commission argued needed to be drastically altered in order to ensure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ field of AI .
The aforementioned move away from cash , which is taking place not just in the U.S. but internationally , is just one example of many .
For instance , earlier this week CNN reported that grocery stores are now considering banning in-person shopping and that the U.S. Department of Labor has recommended that retailers nationwide start “ ‘ using a drive-through window or offering curbside pick-up ’ to protect workers for exposure to coronavirus.
” In addition , last week , the state of Florida approved an online-purchase plan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Nutrition Assistance Program ( SNAP ) .
Other reports have argued that social distancing inside grocery stores is ineffective and endangering people ’ s lives .
As previously mentioned , the May 2019 NSCAI document argues that moving away from in-person shopping is necessary to mitigate China ’ s “ adoption advantage ” and also argued that “ when buying online is literally the only way to get what you want , consumers go online.
” Reports have also argued that these changes in shopping will last far beyond coronavirus , such as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The coronavirus pandemic is pushing more people online and will forever change how Americans shop for groceries , experts say.
” Those cited in the piece argue that this shift away from in-person shopping will be “ permanent ” and also states that “ More people are trying these services than otherwise would have without this catalyst and gives online players a greater chance to acquire and keep a new customer base.
” A similar article in Yahoo !
News argues that , thanks to the current crisis , “ our dependence on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one wants to catch a virus at a shop.
” In addition , the push towards the mass use of self-driving cars has also gotten a boost thanks to coronavirus , with driverless cars now making on-demand deliveries in California .
Two companies , one Chinese-owned and the other backed by Japan ’ s SoftBank , have since been approved to have their self-driving cars used on California roads and that approval was expedited due to the coronavirus crisis .
The CPO of Nuro Inc. , the SoftBank-backed company , was quoted in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic has expedited the public need for contactless delivery services .
Our R2 fleet is custom-designed to change the very nature of driving and the movement of goods by allowing people to remain safely at home while their groceries , medicines , and packages are brought to them.
” Notably , the May 2019 NSCAI document references the inter-connected web of SoftBank-backed companies , particularly those backed by its largely Saudi-funded “ Vision Fund , ” as forming “ the connective tissue for a global federation of tech companies ” set to dominate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only state to start using self-driving cars , as the Mayo Clinic of Florida is now also using them .
“ Using artificial intelligence enables us to protect staff from exposure to this contagious virus by using cutting-edge autonomous vehicle technology and frees up staff time that can be dedicated to direct treatment and care for patients , ” Kent Thielen , M.D.
, CEO of Mayo Clinic in Florida stated in a recent press release cited by Mic .
Like the changes to in-person shopping in the age of coronavirus , other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to stay .
One report published by Mashable is entitled “ It took a coronavirus outbreak for self-driving cars to become more appealing , ” and opens by stating “ Suddenly , a future full of self-driving cars isn ’ t just a sci-fi pipe dream .
What used to be considered a scary , uncertain technology for many Americans looks more like an effective tool to protect ourselves from a fast-spreading , infectious disease.
” It further argues that this is hardly a “ fleeting shift ” in driving habits and one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Anuja Sonalker of Steer Tech , claims that “ There has been a distinct warming up to human-less , contactless technology .
Humans are biohazards , machines are not.
” Another focus of the NSCAI presentation , AI medicine , has also seen its star rise in recent weeks .
For instance , several reports have touted how AI-driven drug discovery platforms have been able to identify potential treatments for coronavirus .
Microsoft , whose research lab director is on the NSCAI , recently put $ 20 million into its “ AI for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ use of AI in analyzing coronavirus data .
In addition , “ telemedicine ” – a form of remote medical care – has also become widely adopted due to the coronavirus crisis .
Several other AI-driven technologies have similarly become more widely adopted thanks to coronavirus , including the use of mass surveillance for “ contact tracing ” as well as facial recognition technology and biometrics .
A recent Wall Street Journal report stated that the government is seriously considering both contact tracing via phone geolocation data and facial recognition technology in order @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In addition , private businesses – like grocery stores and restaurants – are using sensors and facial recognition to see how many people and which people are entering their stores .
As far as biometrics go , university researchers are now working to determine if “ smartphones and biometric wearables already contain the data we need to know if we have become infected with the novel coronavirus.
” Those efforts seek to detect coronavirus infections early by analyzing “ sleep schedules , oxygen levels , activity levels and heart rate ” based @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In countries outside the U.S. , biometric IDs are being touted as a way to track those who have and lack immunity to coronavirus .
In addition , one report in The Edge argued that the current crisis is changing what types of biometrics should be used , asserting that a shift towards thermal scanning and facial recognition is necessary : Also benefiting from the coronavirus crisis is the concept of “ smart cities , ” with Forbes recently writing that “ Smart cities can help us combat the coronavirus pandemic.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ local authorities are using smart city technology , sensors and data to trace the contacts of people infected with the coronavirus .
At the same time , smart cities are also helping in efforts to determine whether social distancing rules are being followed.
” That article in Forbes also contains the following passage : Another report in The Guardian states that “ If one of the government takeaways from coronavirus is that ‘ smart cities ’ including Songdo or Shenzhen are safer cities from a public health perspective , then we can expect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our behaviour in urban areas – and fiercer debates over the power such surveillance hands to corporations and states.
” There have also been reports that assert that typical cities are “ woefully unprepared ” to face pandemics compared to “ smart cities.
” Yet , beyond many of the NSCAI ’ s specific concerns regarding mass AI adoption being conveniently resolved by the current crisis , there has also been a concerted effort to change the public ’ s perception of AI in general .
As previously mentioned , the NSCAI had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , less than a year later , the coronavirus crisis has helped spawn a slew of headlines in just the last few weeks that paint AI very differently , including “ How Artificial Intelligence Can Help Fight Coronavirus , ” “ How AI May Prevent the Next Coronavirus Outbreak , ” “ AI Becomes an Ally in the Fight Against COVID-19 , ” “ Coronavirus : AI steps up in battle against COVID-19 , ” and “ Here ’ s How AI Can Help Africa Fight the Coronavirus , ” among numerous others @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coronavirus crisis has seemingly fulfilled the NSCAI ’ s entire wishlist and removed many of the obstacles to the mass adoption of AI technologies in the United States .
Like major crises of the past , the national security state appears to be using the chaos and fear to promote and implement initiatives that would be normally rejected by Americans and , if history is any indicator , these new changes will remain long after the coronavirus crisis fades from the news cycle .
It is essential that these so-called “ solutions ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that we consider what type of world they will end up creating – an authoritarian technocracy .
We ignore the rapid advance of these NSCAI-promoted initiatives and the phasing out of so-called “ legacy systems ” ( and with them , many long-cherished freedoms ) at our own peril .

WASHINGTON DC (The Last American Vagabond) — Last year, a U.S. government body dedicated to examining how artificial intelligence can “address the national security and defense needs of the United States” discussed in detail the “structural” changes that the American economy and society must undergo in order to ensure a technological advantage over China, according to a recent document acquired through an FOIA request. This document suggests that the U.S. follow China’s lead and even surpass them in many aspects related to AI-driven technologies, particularly their use of mass surveillance. This perspective clearly clashes with the public rhetoric of prominent U.S. government officials and politicians on China, who have labeled the Chinese government’s technology investments and export of its surveillance systems and other technologies as a major “threat” to Americans’ “way of life.”
In addition, many of the steps for the implementation of such a program in the U.S., as laid out in this newly available document, are currently being promoted and implemented as part of the government’s response to the current coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis. This likely due to the fact that many members of this same body have considerable overlap with the taskforces and advisors currently guiding the government’s plans to “re-open the economy” and efforts to use technology to respond to the current crisis.
The FOIA document, obtained by the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), was produced by a little-known U.S. government organization called the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence (NSCAI). It was created by the 2018 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and its official purpose is “to consider the methods and means necessary to advance the development of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, and associated technologies to comprehensively address the national security and defense needs of the United States.”
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The NSCAI is a key part of the government’s response to what is often referred to as the coming “fourth industrial revolution,” which has been described as “a revolution characterized by discontinuous technological development in areas like artificial intelligence (AI), big data, fifth-generation telecommunications networking (5G), nanotechnology and biotechnology, robotics, the Internet of Things (IoT), and quantum computing.”
However, their main focus is ensuring that “the United States … maintain a technological advantage in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and other associated technologies related to national security and defense.” The vice-chair of NSCAI, Robert Work – former Deputy Secretary of Defense and senior fellow at the hawkish Center for a New American Security (CNAS), described the commission’s purpose as determining “how the U.S. national security apparatus should approach artificial intelligence, including a focus on how the government can work with industry to compete with China’s ‘civil-military fusion’ concept.”
The recently released NSCAI document is a May 2019 presentation entitled “Chinese Tech Landscape Overview.” Throughout the presentation, the NSCAI promotes the overhaul of the U.S. economy and way of life as necessary for allowing the U.S. to ensure it holds a considerable technological advantage over China, as losing this advantage is currently deemed a major “national security” issue by the U.S. national security apparatus. This concern about maintaining a technological advantage can be seen in several other U.S. military documents and think tank reports, several of which have warned that the U.S.’ technological advantage is quickly eroding.
The U.S. government and establishment media outlets often blame alleged Chinese espionage or the Chinese government’s more explicit partnerships with private technology companies in support of their claim that the U.S. is losing this advantage over China. For instance, Chris Darby, the current CEO of the CIA’s In-Q-Tel, who is also on the NSCAI, told CBS News last year that China is the U.S.’ main competitor in terms of technology and that U.S. privacy laws were hampering the U.S.’ capacity to counter China in this regard, stating that:
[D]ata is the new oil. And China is just awash with data. And they don’t have the same restraints that we do around collecting it and using it, because of the privacy difference between our countries. This notion that they have the largest labeled data set in the world is going to be a huge strength for them.”
In another example, Michael Dempsey – former acting Director of National Intelligence and currently a government-funded fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations – argued in The Hill that:
It’s quite clear, though, that China is determined to erase our technological advantage, and is committing hundreds of billions of dollars to this effort. In particular, China is determined to be a world leader in such areas as artificial intelligence, high performance computing, and synthetic biology. These are the industries that will shape life on the planet and the military balance of power for the next several decades.”
In fact, the national security apparatus of the United States is so concerned about losing a technological edge over China that the Pentagon recently decided to join forces directly with the U.S. intelligence community in order “to get in front of Chinese advances in artificial intelligence.” This union resulted in the creation of the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (JAIC), which ties together “the military’s efforts with those of the Intelligence Community, allowing them to combine efforts in a breakneck push to move government’s AI initiatives forward.” It also coordinates with other government agencies, industry, academics, and U.S. allies. Robert Work, who subsequently became the NSCAI vice-chair, said at the time that JAIC’s creation was a “welcome first step in response to Chinese, and to a lesser extent, Russian, plans to dominate these technologies.”
Similar concerns about “losing” technological advantage to China have also been voiced by the NSCAI chairman, Eric Schmidt, the former head of Alphabet – Google’s parent company, who argued in February in the New York Times that Silicon Valley could soon lose “the technology wars” to China if the U.S. government doesn’t take action. Thus, the three main groups represented within the NSCAI – the intelligence community, the Pentagon and Silicon Valley – all view China’s advancements in AI as a major national security threat (and in Silicon Valley’s case, threat to their bottom lines and market shares) that must be tackled quickly.
Targeting China’s “Adoption Advantage”
In the May 2019 “Chinese Tech Landscape Overview” presentation, the NSCAI discusses that, while the U.S. still leads in the “creation” stage of AI and related technologies, it lags behind China in the “adoption” stage due to “structural factors.” It says that “creation”, followed by “adoption” and “iteration” are the three phases of the “life cycle of new tech” and asserts that failing to dominate in the “adoption” stage will allow China to “leapfrog” the U.S. and dominate AI for the foreseeable future.
The presentation also argues that, in order to “leapfrog” competitors in emerging markets, what is needed is not “individual brilliance” but instead specific “structural conditions that exist within certain markets.” It cites several case studies where China is considered to be “leapfrogging” the U.S. due to major differences in these “structural factors.” Thus, the insinuation of the document (though not directly stated) is that the U.S. must alter the “structural factors” that are currently responsible for its lagging behind China in the “adoption” phase of AI-driven technologies.
Chief among the troublesome “structural factors” highlighted in this presentation are so-called “legacy systems” that are common in the U.S. but much less so in China. The NSCAI document states that examples of “legacy systems” include a financial system that still utilizes cash and card payments, individual car ownership and even receiving medical attention from a human doctor. It states that, while these “legacy systems” in the US are “good enough,” too many “good enough” systems “hinder the adoption of new things,” specifically AI-driven systems.
Another structural factor deemed by the NSCAI to be an obstacle to the U.S.’ ability to maintain a technological advantage over China is the “scale of the consumer market,” arguing that “extreme urban density = on-demand service adoption.” In other words, extreme urbanization results in more people using online or mobile-based “on-demand” services, ranging from ride-sharing to online shopping. It also cites the use of mass surveillance on China’s “huge population base” is an example of how China’s “scale of consumer market” advantage allowing “China to leap ahead” in the fields of related technologies, like facial recognition.
You Might Like
In addition to the alleged shortcomings of the U.S.’ “legacy systems” and lack of “extreme urban density,” the NSCAI also calls for more “explicit government support and involvement” as a means to speed up the adoption of these systems in the U.S. This includes the government lending its stores of data on civilians to train AI, specifically citing facial recognition databases, and mandating that cities be “re-architected around AVs [autonomous vehicles],” among others. Other examples given include the government investing large amounts of money in AI start-ups and adding tech behemoths to a national, public-private AI taskforce focused on smart city-implementation (among other things).
With regards to the latter, the document says “this level of public-private cooperation” in China is “outwardly embraced” by the parties involved, with this “serving as a stark contrast to the controversy around Silicon Valley selling to the U.S. government.” Examples of such controversy, from the NSCAI’s perspective, likely include Google employees petitioning to end the Google-Pentagon “Project Maven,” which uses Google’s AI software to analyze footage captured by drones. Google eventually chose not to renew its Maven contract as a result of the controversy, even though top Google executives viewed the project as a “golden opportunity” to collaborate more closely with the military and intelligence communities.
The document also defines another aspect of government support as the “clearing of regulatory barriers.” This term is used in the document specifically with respect to U.S. privacy laws, despite the fact that the U.S. national security state has long violated these laws with near complete impunity. However, the document seems to suggest that privacy laws in the U.S. should be altered so that what the U.S. government has done “in secret” with private citizen data can be done more openly and more extensively. The NSCAI document also discusses the removal of “regulatory barriers” in order to speed up the adoption of self-driving cars, even though autonomous driving technology has resulted in several deadly and horrific car accidents and presents other safety concerns.
Also discussed is how China’s “adoption advantage” will “allow it to leapfrog the U.S.” in several new fields, including “AI medical diagnosis” and “smart cities.” It then asserts that “the future will be decided at the intersection of private enterprise and policy leaders between China and the U.S.” If this coordination over the global AI market does not occur, the document warns that “we [the U.S.] risk being left out of the discussions where norms around AI are set for the rest of our lifetimes.”
The presentation also dwells considerably on how “the main battleground [in technology] are not the domestic Chinese and US markets,” but what it refers to as the NBU (next billion users) markets, where it states that “Chinese players will aggressively challenge Silicon Valley.” In order to challenge them more successfully, the presentation argues that, “just like we [view] the market of teenagers as a harbinger for new trends, we should look at China.”
The document also expresses concerns about China exporting AI more extensively and intensively than the U.S., saying that China is “already crossing borders” by helping to build facial databases in Zimbabwe and selling image recognition and smart city systems to Malaysia. If allowed to become “the unambiguous leader in AI,” it says that “China could end up writing much of the rulebook of international norms around the deployment of AI” and that it would “broaden China’s sphere of influence amongst an international community that increasingly looks to the pragmatic authoritarianism of China and Singapore as an alternative to Western liberal democracy.”
What Will Replace America’s “Legacy Systems”?
Given that the document makes it quite clear that “legacy systems” in the U.S. are impeding its ability to prevent China from “leapfrogging” ahead in AI and then dominating it for the foreseeable future, it is also important to examine what the document suggests should replace these “legacy systems” in the U.S.
As previously mentioned, one “legacy system” cited early on in the presentation is the main means of payment for most Americans, cash and credit/debit cards. The presentation asserts, in contrast to these “legacy systems” that the best and most advanced system is moving entirely to smartphone-based digital wallets.
It notes specifically the main mobile wallet provider in India, PayTM, is majority owned by Chinese companies. It quotes an article, which states that “a big break came [in 2016] when India canceled 86% of currency in circulation in an effort to cut corruption and bring more people into the tax net by forcing them to use less cash.” At the time, claims that India’s 2016 “currency reform” would be used as a stepping stone towards a cashless society were dismissed by some as “conspiracy theory.” However, last year, a committee convened by India’s central bank (and led by an Indian tech oligarch who also created India’s massive civilian biometric database) resulted in the Indian government’s “Cashless India” program.
Regarding India’s 2016 “currency reform,” the NSCAI document then asserts that “this would be unfathomable in the West. And unsurprisingly, when 86% of the cash got cancelled and nobody had a credit card, mobile wallets in India exploded, laying the groundwork for a far more advanced payments ecosystem in India than the US.” However, it has become increasingly less unfathomable in light of the current coronavirus crisis, which has seen efforts to reduce the amount of cash used because paper bills may carry the virus as well as efforts to introduce a Federal Reserve-backed “digital dollar.”
In addition, the NSCAI document from last May calls for the end of in-person shopping and promotes moving towards all shopping being performed online. It argues that “American companies have a lot to gain by adopting ideas from Chinese companies” by shifting towards exclusive e-commerce purchasing options. It states that only shopping online provides a “great experience” and also adds that “when buying online is literally the only way to get what you want, consumers go online.”
Another “legacy system” that the NSCAI seeks to overhaul is car ownership, as it promotes autonomous, or self-driving vehicles and further asserts that “fleet ownership > individual ownership.” It specifically points to a need for “a centralized ride-sharing network,” which it says “is needed to coordinate cars to achieve near 100% utilization rates.” However, it warns against ride-sharing networks that “need a human operator paired with each vehicle” and also asserts that “fleet ownership makes more sense” than individual car ownership. It also specifically calls for these fleets to not only be composed of self-driving cars, but electric cars and cites reports that China “has the world’s most aggressive electric vehicle goals….and seek[s] the lead in an emerging industry.”
The document states that China leads in ride-sharing today even though ride-sharing was pioneered first in the U.S. It asserts once again that the U.S. “legacy system” of individual car ownership and lack of “extreme urban density” are responsible for China’s dominance in this area. It also predicts that China will “achieve mass autonomous [vehicle] adoption before the U.S.,” largely because “the lack of mass car ownership [in China] leads to far more consumer receptiveness to AVs [autonomous vehicles].” It then notes that “earlier mass adoption leads to a virtuous cycle that allows Chinese core self-driving tech to accelerate beyond [its] Western counterparts.”
In addition to their vision for a future financial system and future self-driving transport system, the NSCAI has a similarly dystopian vision for surveillance. The document calls mass surveillance “one of the ‘first-and-best customers’ for AI” and “a killer application for deep learning.” It also states that “having streets carpeted with cameras is good infrastructure.”
It then discusses how “an entire generation of AI unicorn” companies are “collecting the bulk of their early revenue from government security contracts” and praises the use of AI in facilitating policing activities. For instance, it lauds reports that “police are making convictions based on phone calls monitored with iFlyTek’s voice-recognition technology” and that “police departments are using [AI] facial recognition tech to assist in everything from catching traffic law violators to resolving murder cases.”
On the point of facial recognition technology specifically, the NSCAI document asserts that China has “leapt ahead” of the US on facial recognition, even though “breakthroughs in using machine learning for image recognition initially occurred in the US.” It claims that China’s advantage in this instance is because they have government-implemented mass surveillance (“clearing of regulatory barriers”), enormous government-provided stores of data (“explicit government support”) combined with private sector databases on a huge population base (“scale of consumer market”). As a consequence of this, the NSCAI argues, China is also set to leap ahead of the U.S. in both image/facial recognition and biometrics.
The document also points to another glaring difference between the U.S. and its rival, stating that: “In the press and politics of America and Europe, Al is painted as something to be feared that is eroding privacy and stealing jobs. Conversely, China views it as both a tool for solving major macroeconomic challenges in order to sustain their economic miracle, and an opportunity to take technological leadership on the global stage.”
The NSCAI document also touches on the area of healthcare, calling for the implementation of a system that seems to be becoming reality thanks to the current coronavirus crisis. In discussing the use of AI in healthcare (almost a year before the current crisis began), it states that “China could lead the world in this sector” and “this could lead to them exporting their tech and setting international norms.” One reason for this is also that China has “far too few doctors for the population” and calls having enough doctors for in-person visits a “legacy system.” It also cited U.S. regulatory measures such as “HIPPA compliance and FDA approval” as obstacles that don’t constrain Chinese authorities.
More troubling, it argues that “the potential impact of government supplied data is even more significant in biology and healthcare,” and says it is likely that “the Chinese government [will] require every single citizen to have their DNA sequenced and stored in government databases, something nearly impossible to imagine in places as privacy conscious as the U.S. and Europe.” It continues by saying that “the Chinese apparatus is well-equipped to take advantage” and calls these civilian DNA databases a “logical next step.”
Who Are The NSCAI?
Given the sweeping changes to the U.S. that the NSCAI promoted in this presentation last May, it becomes important to examine who makes up the commission and to consider their influence over U.S. policy on these matters, particularly during the current crisis. As previously mentioned, the chairman of the NSCAI is Eric Schmidt, the former head of Alphabet (Google’s parent company) who has also invested heavily in Israeli intelligence-linked tech companies including the controversial start-up “incubator” Team8. In addition, the committee’s vice-chair is Robert Work, is not only a former top Pentagon official, but is currently working with the think tank CNAS, which is run by John McCain’s long-time foreign policy adviser and Joe Biden’s former national security adviser.
Other members of the NSCAI are as follows:
Safra Catz, CEO of Oracle, with close ties to Trump’s top donor Sheldon Adelson
Steve Chien, supervisor of the Artificial Intelligence Group at Caltech’s Jet Propulsion Lab
Mignon Clyburn, Open Society Foundation fellow and former FCC commissioner
Chris Darby, CEO of In-Q-Tel (CIA’s venture capital arm)
Ken Ford, CEO of the Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition
Jose-Marie Griffiths, president of Dakota State University and former National Science Board member
Eric Horvitz, director of Microsoft Research Labs
Andy Jassy, CEO of Amazon Web Services (CIA contractor)
Gilman Louie, partner at Alsop Louie Partners and former CEO of In-Q-Tel
William Mark, director of SRI International and former Lockheed Martin director
Jason Matheny, director of the Center for Security and Emerging Technology, former Assistant director of National Intelligence and former director of IARPA (Intelligence Advanced Research Project Agency)
Katharina McFarland, consultant at Cypress International and former Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition
Andrew Moore, head of Google Cloud AI
As can be seen in the list above, there is a considerable amount of overlap between the NSCAI and the companies currently advising the White House on “re-opening” the economy (Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Lockheed Martin, Oracle) and one NSCAI member, Oracle’s Safra Katz, is on the White House’s “economic revival” taskforce. Also, there is also overlap between the NSCAI and the companies that are intimately involved in the implementation of the “contact tracing” “coronavirus surveillance system,” a mass surveillance system promoted by the Jared Kushner-led, private-sector coronavirus task force. That surveillance system is set to be constructed by companies with deep ties to Google and the U.S. national security state, and both Google and Apple, who create the operating systems for the vast majority of smartphones used in the U.S., have said they will now build that surveillance system directly into their smartphone operating systems.
Also notable is the fact that In-Q-Tel and the U.S. intelligence community has considerable representation on the NSCAI and that they also boast close ties with Google, Palantir and other Silicon Valley giants, having been early investors in those companies. Both Google and Palantir, as well as Amazon (also on the NSCAI) are also major contractors for U.S. intelligence agencies. In-Q-Tel’s involvement on the NSCAI is also significant because they have been heavily promoting mass surveillance of consumer electronic devices for use in pandemics for the past several years. Much of that push has come from In-Q-Tel’s current Executive Vice President Tara O’Toole, who was previously the director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and also co-authored several controversial biowarfare/pandemic simulations, such as Dark Winter.
In addition, since at least January, the U.S. intelligence community and the Pentagon have been at the forefront of developing the U.S. government’s still-classified “9/11-style” response plans for the coronavirus crisis, alongside the National Security Council. Few news organizations have noted that these classified response plans, which are set to be triggered if and when the U.S. reaches a certain number of coronavirus cases, has been created largely by elements of the national security state (i.e. the NSC, Pentagon, and intelligence), as opposed to civilian agencies or those focused on public health issues.
Furthermore, it has been reported that the U.S. intelligence community, as well as U.S. military intelligence, knew by at least January (though recent reports have said as early as last November) that the coronavirus crisis would reach “pandemic proportions” by March. The American public were not warned, but elite members of the business and political classes were apparently informed, given the record numbers of CEO resignations in January and several high-profile insider trading allegations that preceded the current crisis by a matter of weeks.
Perhaps even more disconcerting is the added fact that the U.S. government not only participated in the eerily prescient pandemic simulation last October known as Event 201, it also led a series of pandemic response simulations last year. Crimson Contagion was a series of four simulations that involved 19 U.S. federal agencies, including intelligence and the military, as well as 12 different states and a host of private sector companies that simulated a devastating pandemic influenza outbreak that had originated in China. It was led by the current HHS Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Robert Kadlec, who is a former lobbyist for military and intelligence contractors and a Bush-era homeland security “bioterrorism” advisor.
RELATED: Lemonade Co. Fights Police State, Pledges to Pay Fines for Kids Busted for ‘Illegal Lemonade Stands’
In addition, both Kadlec and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, which was intimately involved in Event 201, have direct ties to the controversial June 2001 biowarfare exercise “Dark Winter,” which predicted the 2001 anthrax attacks that transpired just months later in disturbing ways. Though efforts by media and government were made to blame the anthrax attacks on a foreign source, the anthrax was later found to have originated at a U.S. bioweapons lab and the FBI investigation into the case has been widely regarded as a cover-up, including by the FBI’s once-lead investigator on that case.
Given the above, it is worth asking if those who share the NSCAI’s vision saw the coronavirus pandemic early on as an opportunity to make the “structural changes” it had deemed essential to countering China’s lead in the mass adoption of AI-driven technologies, especially considering that many of the changes in the May 2019 document are now quickly taking place under the guise of combatting the coronavirus crisis.
The NSCAI Vision Takes Shape
Though the May 2019 NSCAI document was authored nearly a year ago, the coronavirus crisis has resulted in the implementation of many of the changes and the removal of many of the “structural” obstacles that the commission argued needed to be drastically altered in order to ensure a technological advantage over China in the field of AI. The aforementioned move away from cash, which is taking place not just in the U.S. but internationally, is just one example of many.
For instance, earlier this week CNN reported that grocery stores are now considering banning in-person shopping and that the U.S. Department of Labor has recommended that retailers nationwide start “‘using a drive-through window or offering curbside pick-up’ to protect workers for exposure to coronavirus.” In addition, last week, the state of Florida approved an online-purchase plan for low income families using the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Other reports have argued that social distancing inside grocery stores is ineffective and endangering people’s lives. As previously mentioned, the May 2019 NSCAI document argues that moving away from in-person shopping is necessary to mitigate China’s “adoption advantage” and also argued that “when buying online is literally the only way to get what you want, consumers go online.”
Reports have also argued that these changes in shopping will last far beyond coronavirus, such as an article by Business Insider entitled “The coronavirus pandemic is pushing more people online and will forever change how Americans shop for groceries, experts say.” Those cited in the piece argue that this shift away from in-person shopping will be “permanent” and also states that “More people are trying these services than otherwise would have without this catalyst and gives online players a greater chance to acquire and keep a new customer base.” A similar article in Yahoo! News argues that, thanks to the current crisis, “our dependence on online shopping will only rise because no one wants to catch a virus at a shop.”
In addition, the push towards the mass use of self-driving cars has also gotten a boost thanks to coronavirus, with driverless cars now making on-demand deliveries in California. Two companies, one Chinese-owned and the other backed by Japan’s SoftBank, have since been approved to have their self-driving cars used on California roads and that approval was expedited due to the coronavirus crisis. The CPO of Nuro Inc., the SoftBank-backed company, was quoted in Bloomberg as saying that “The Covid-19 pandemic has expedited the public need for contactless delivery services. Our R2 fleet is custom-designed to change the very nature of driving and the movement of goods by allowing people to remain safely at home while their groceries, medicines, and packages are brought to them.” Notably, the May 2019 NSCAI document references the inter-connected web of SoftBank-backed companies, particularly those backed by its largely Saudi-funded “Vision Fund,” as forming “the connective tissue for a global federation of tech companies” set to dominate AI.
California isn’t the only state to start using self-driving cars, as the Mayo Clinic of Florida is now also using them. “Using artificial intelligence enables us to protect staff from exposure to this contagious virus by using cutting-edge autonomous vehicle technology and frees up staff time that can be dedicated to direct treatment and care for patients,” Kent Thielen, M.D., CEO of Mayo Clinic in Florida stated in a recent press release cited by Mic.
Like the changes to in-person shopping in the age of coronavirus, other reports assert that self-driving vehicles are here to stay. One report published by Mashable is entitled “It took a coronavirus outbreak for self-driving cars to become more appealing,” and opens by stating “Suddenly, a future full of self-driving cars isn’t just a sci-fi pipe dream. What used to be considered a scary, uncertain technology for many Americans looks more like an effective tool to protect ourselves from a fast-spreading, infectious disease.” It further argues that this is hardly a “fleeting shift” in driving habits and one tech CEO cited in the piece, Anuja Sonalker of Steer Tech, claims that “There has been a distinct warming up to human-less, contactless technology. Humans are biohazards, machines are not.”
Another focus of the NSCAI presentation, AI medicine, has also seen its star rise in recent weeks. For instance, several reports have touted how AI-driven drug discovery platforms have been able to identify potential treatments for coronavirus. Microsoft, whose research lab director is on the NSCAI, recently put $20 million into its “AI for health” program to speed up the use of AI in analyzing coronavirus data. In addition, “telemedicine”– a form of remote medical care – has also become widely adopted due to the coronavirus crisis.
Several other AI-driven technologies have similarly become more widely adopted thanks to coronavirus, including the use of mass surveillance for “contact tracing” as well as facial recognition technology and biometrics. A recent Wall Street Journal report stated that the government is seriously considering both contact tracing via phone geolocation data and facial recognition technology in order to track those who might have coronavirus. In addition, private businesses – like grocery stores and restaurants – are using sensors and facial recognition to see how many people and which people are entering their stores.
As far as biometrics go, university researchers are now working to determine if “smartphones and biometric wearables already contain the data we need to know if we have become infected with the novel coronavirus.” Those efforts seek to detect coronavirus infections early by analyzing “sleep schedules, oxygen levels, activity levels and heart rate” based on smartphone apps like FitBit and smartwatches. In countries outside the U.S., biometric IDs are being touted as a way to track those who have and lack immunity to coronavirus.
In addition, one report in The Edge argued that the current crisis is changing what types of biometrics should be used, asserting that a shift towards thermal scanning and facial recognition is necessary:
At this critical juncture of the crisis, any integrated facial recognition and thermal scanning solution must be implemented easily, rapidly and in a cost-effective manner. Workers returning to offices or factories must not have to scramble to learn a new process or fumble with declaration forms. They must feel safe and healthy for them to work productively. They just have to look at the camera and smile. Cameras and thermal scanners, supported by a cloud-based solution and the appropriate software protocols, will do the rest.”
Also benefiting from the coronavirus crisis is the concept of “smart cities,” with Forbes recently writing that “Smart cities can help us combat the coronavirus pandemic.” That article states that “Governments and local authorities are using smart city technology, sensors and data to trace the contacts of people infected with the coronavirus. At the same time, smart cities are also helping in efforts to determine whether social distancing rules are being followed.”
That article in Forbes also contains the following passage:
…[T]he use of masses of connected sensors makes it clear that the coronavirus pandemic is–intentionally or not–being used as a testbed for new surveillance technologies that may threaten privacy and civil liberties. So aside from being a global health crisis, the coronavirus has effectively become an experiment in how to monitor and control people at scale.”
Another report in The Guardian states that “If one of the government takeaways from coronavirus is that ‘smart cities’ including Songdo or Shenzhen are safer cities from a public health perspective, then we can expect greater efforts to digitally capture and record our behaviour in urban areas – and fiercer debates over the power such surveillance hands to corporations and states.” There have also been reports that assert that typical cities are “woefully unprepared” to face pandemics compared to “smart cities.”
Yet, beyond many of the NSCAI’s specific concerns regarding mass AI adoption being conveniently resolved by the current crisis, there has also been a concerted effort to change the public’s perception of AI in general. As previously mentioned, the NSCAI had pointed out last year that:
In the press and politics of America and Europe, Al is painted as something to be feared that is eroding privacy and stealing jobs. Conversely, China views it as both a tool for solving major macroeconomic challenges in order to sustain their economic miracle, and an opportunity to take technological leadership on the global stage.”
Now, less than a year later, the coronavirus crisis has helped spawn a slew of headlines in just the last few weeks that paint AI very differently, including “How Artificial Intelligence Can Help Fight Coronavirus,” “How AI May Prevent the Next Coronavirus Outbreak,” “AI Becomes an Ally in the Fight Against COVID-19,” “Coronavirus: AI steps up in battle against COVID-19,” and “Here’s How AI Can Help Africa Fight the Coronavirus,” among numerous others.
It is indeed striking how the coronavirus crisis has seemingly fulfilled the NSCAI’s entire wishlist and removed many of the obstacles to the mass adoption of AI technologies in the United States. Like major crises of the past, the national security state appears to be using the chaos and fear to promote and implement initiatives that would be normally rejected by Americans and, if history is any indicator, these new changes will remain long after the coronavirus crisis fades from the news cycle. It is essential that these so-called “solutions” be recognized for what they are and that we consider what type of world they will end up creating – an authoritarian technocracy. We ignore the rapid advance of these NSCAI-promoted initiatives and the phasing out of so-called “legacy systems” (and with them, many long-cherished freedoms) at our own peril.
Article posted with permission from MintPress News
h/t TWS


thedcclothesline--2020-04-26--Newly Unearthed Clip From 1993 Seems To Corroborate Biden Accuser’s Assault Claim

Some devastating evidence supporting former Vice President Joe Biden ’ s sexual assault accuser ’ s claims has resurfaced and it ’ s not good news for Sleepy Joe .
A resurfaced clip of “ Larry King Live ” from 1993 appears to include the mother of Tara Reade — who has accused Joe Biden of past sexual assault while in the Senate — alluding to “ problems ” her daughter faced while working as a staffer for the then-U.S. senator from Delaware , Fox News reports .
The Intercept published a transcript of the clip on Friday .
Carmine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reports that Reade has claimed that she told her mother , her brother and a friend about the alleged assault and that her mother called in to “ Larry King Live.
” take our poll - story continues below “ Yes , hello .
I ’ m wondering what a staffer would do besides go to the press in Washington ?
My daughter has just left there , after working for a prominent senator , and could not get through with her problems at all , and the only thing she could have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and she chose not to do it out of respect for him , ” the caller says .
“ In other words , she had a story to tell but , out of respect for the person she worked for , she didn ’ t tell it ?
” King inquires .
“ That ’ s true , ” the woman responds before King cuts away to a panel to discuss her claim .
The Intercept reported earlier that Reade said her late mother once called into CNN ’ s “ Larry King @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s “ experience on Capitol Hill , ” where the alleged encounter with Biden took place .
Reade didn ’ t recall other information , such as the date or even year and The Intercept managed to dig up a transcript of the call , but not the video .
CNN employs a team of investigative reporters , who presumably could have quickly found the elusive footage within the network ’ s files .
But rather than CNN , it was the Media Research Center ’ s NewsBusters , a conservative group that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exhumed the footage from its own vault .
“ It ’ s truly despicable that this footage existed and yet CNN failed to do its own due diligence within its own archives , ” NewsBusters managing editor Curtis Houck told Fox News .
Reade took to Twitter to confirm that it was her mother who called in to “ Larry King Live.
” Steve Straub at The Federalist Papers has more : As you might suspect , CNN chose to exclude any mention of the newfound footage from it ’ s Friday lineup @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be the end , or close to it , of Biden 2020 .
He was always a very weak candidate who is in obvious mental decline , so now Democrats have the chance to replace him with the candidate of the establishments choice .
Joe does not have enough delegates at this point to claim the nomination so a brokered back room deal is almost certain at this point .
There does not seem to be a way for Joe to wiggle out of this .
If the Democrats and their puppet media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this evidence that Tara Reade is telling the truth you can be assured the Trump campaign and the GOP will .
Join us at SPREELY if you want REAL NEWS without the leftist censorship !
Also join us at MUMBLIT !

DINO PORRAZZO at Right Wing Tribune
Some devastating evidence supporting former Vice President Joe Biden’s sexual assault accuser’s claims has resurfaced and it’s not good news for Sleepy Joe.
A resurfaced clip of “Larry King Live” from 1993 appears to include the mother of Tara Reade — who has accused Joe Biden of past sexual assault while in the Senate — alluding to “problems” her daughter faced while working as a staffer for the then-U.S. senator from Delaware, Fox News reports.
The Intercept published a transcript of the clip on Friday.
Carmine Sabia at We Are Biased Opinion Blog reports that Reade has claimed that she told her mother, her brother and a friend about the alleged assault and that her mother called in to “Larry King Live.”
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
“San Luis Obispo, California, hello,” King begins.
“Yes, hello. I’m wondering what a staffer would do besides go to the press in Washington? My daughter has just left there, after working for a prominent senator, and could not get through with her problems at all, and the only thing she could have done was go to the press, and she chose not to do it out of respect for him,” the caller says.
“In other words, she had a story to tell but, out of respect for the person she worked for, she didn’t tell it?” King inquires.
“That’s true,” the woman responds before King cuts away to a panel to discuss her claim.
Wow!
The Intercept reported earlier that Reade said her late mother once called into CNN’s “Larry King Live” to discuss her daughter’s “experience on Capitol Hill,” where the alleged encounter with Biden took place. Reade didn’t recall other information, such as the date or even year and The Intercept managed to dig up a transcript of the call, but not the video.
CNN employs a team of investigative reporters, who presumably could have quickly found the elusive footage within the network’s files. But rather than CNN, it was the Media Research Center’s NewsBusters, a conservative group that seeks to expose liberal bias, who exhumed the footage from its own vault.
“It’s truly despicable that this footage existed and yet CNN failed to do its own due diligence within its own archives,” NewsBusters managing editor Curtis Houck told Fox News.
Reade took to Twitter to confirm that it was her mother who called in to “Larry King Live.”
This is my mom. I miss her so much and her brave support of me. https://t.co/okU80kqWAI — taratweets ( Alexandra Tara Reade) (@ReadeAlexandra) April 24, 2020
You Might Like
Steve Straub at The Federalist Papers has more:
As you might suspect, CNN chose to exclude any mention of the newfound footage from it’s Friday lineup of prime time shows.
This could be the end, or close to it, of Biden 2020.
He was always a very weak candidate who is in obvious mental decline, so now Democrats have the chance to replace him with the candidate of the establishments choice.
Joe does not have enough delegates at this point to claim the nomination so a brokered back room deal is almost certain at this point.
There does not seem to be a way for Joe to wiggle out of this.
If the Democrats and their puppet media do not make a big deal of this evidence that Tara Reade is telling the truth you can be assured the Trump campaign and the GOP will.
Scroll down to leave a comment!
Join us at SPREELY if you want REAL NEWS without the leftist censorship!
Also join us at MUMBLIT!
DINO PORRAZZO at Right Wing Tribune
Join me on Twitter!
God Bless.


thedcclothesline--2020-04-26--Michigan Gov. Whitmer Faces Protest Outside Her Home As Lawmakers Mull Curbing Her Powers: “I’m Not

Michigan Gov. Whitmer Faces Protest Outside Her Home As Lawmakers Mull Curbing Her Powers: “I’m Not Going To Sign Any Bill That Takes Authority Away From Me,” – Extends Lockdown

Michigan Governor Strengthens Hold on State , Extends Stay at Home Order to May 15 Once again we see how crises brings out the little Democrat tyrants .
Michigan Gov .
Whitmer Faces Protest Outside Her Home As Lawmakers Mull Curbing Her Powers Former Nevada attorney general says Gov .
Whitmer broke the law Protesters gathered outside the home of Michigan Gov .
Gretchen Whitmer on Thursday — the same day reports emerged that she plans to extend the state ’ s coronavirus stay-at-home order by two weeks until May 15 .
The demonstration , dubbed “ Operation Queen ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Whitmer wearing a crown , FOX 2 of Detroit reported .
“ We wanted to send Gretchen Whitmer a message , we didn ’ t want to surrender our liberties just for a little temporary safety , ” Brian Pannebecker , who helped organize the protest , told the station .
WHITMER BACKTRACKS AFTER COVID-19 CONTRACT AWARDED TO DEM CONSULTANT WHO SAID TRUMP SHOULD ‘ GET CORONAVIRUS ASAP ’ Meanwhile , the Michigan Legislature has scheduled a special session for Friday with the goal of creating an oversight committee to review Whitmer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her of some of her powers , the Detroit Free Press reported .
Critics have accused Whitmer , a 48-year-old first-term Democratic governor , of overstepping her authority with a series of measures intended to stem the spread of coronavirus in the state .
April 9 revisions to her initial stay-at-home order included bans on visiting friends and relatives or traveling to vacation homes , and halts on sales of items such as furniture and gardening supplies .
In a podcast interview , she also said abortions should continue in the state during @ @ @ @ @ @ @ part of “ life-sustaining ” health care for women .
In addition , Whitmer came under fire after a no-bid coronavirus-related state contract was awarded to a firm operated by a well-known Democratic consultant who had written that President Trump should “ get coronavirus ASAP.
” Whitmer ’ s office later acknowleged that the contract was awarded without adhering to normal protocols .
Michigan House Speaker Lee Chatfield , R-Levering , explained the point of Friday ’ s planned session in a Twitter message .
“ The House & Senate will convene tomorrow @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 to examine our government ’ s response , ” he wrote .
“ Michigan needs to handle this pandemic seriously yet properly .
It ’ s what the people deserve , and we will see that it happens.
” In another tweet , Chatfield noted that marijuana , lottery tickets and alcohol had been declared “ essential , ” while lawn care , construction and fishing in a motorized boat had been declared nonessential amid the outbreak .
On Monday , Whitmer said she would take a 10 percent cut to her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would take cuts of 5 percent as the state grapples with the financial fallout of the coronavirus shutdowns .
She also continued defending the orders she has issued .
“ I know it ’ s not easy , but the price of losing loved ones is what ’ s at stake , ” she said , noting that many people who contract the virus show no symptoms but can still spread it .
The theme of Thursday ’ s protest in Lansing , the state ’ s capital city , was that many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be able to do so , Pannebecker said .
“ Younger people , healthy people , without putting anybody else in danger , including ourselves , and others in danger , should be able to go back to work , ” Pannebecker told FOX 2 .
The demonstration came eight days after a larger gathering outside the Statehouse called “ Operation Gridlock.
” As of late Thursday , Michigan had more than 35,200 confirmed cases of the virus and nearly 3,000 deaths , the Detroit News reported .

Michigan Governor Strengthens Hold on State, Extends Stay at Home Order to May 15
Once again we see how crises brings out the little Democrat tyrants.
Michigan Gov. Whitmer Faces Protest Outside Her Home As Lawmakers Mull Curbing Her Powers
By Dom Calicchio | Fox News April 24, 2020:
Former Nevada attorney general says Gov. Whitmer broke the law
Protesters gathered outside the home of Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer on Thursday — the same day reports emerged that she plans to extend the state’s coronavirus stay-at-home order by two weeks until May 15.
The demonstration, dubbed “Operation Queen’s Castle,” featured an image of Whitmer wearing a crown, FOX 2 of Detroit reported.
“We wanted to send Gretchen Whitmer a message, we didn’t want to surrender our liberties just for a little temporary safety,” Brian Pannebecker, who helped organize the protest, told the station.
WHITMER BACKTRACKS AFTER COVID-19 CONTRACT AWARDED TO DEM CONSULTANT WHO SAID TRUMP SHOULD ‘GET CORONAVIRUS ASAP’
Meanwhile, the Michigan Legislature has scheduled a special session for Friday with the goal of creating an oversight committee to review Whitmer’s coronavirus orders and possibly strip her of some of her powers, the Detroit Free Press reported.
Critics have accused Whitmer, a 48-year-old first-term Democratic governor, of overstepping her authority with a series of measures intended to stem the spread of coronavirus in the state. April 9 revisions to her initial stay-at-home order included bans on visiting friends and relatives or traveling to vacation homes, and halts on sales of items such as furniture and gardening supplies.
In a podcast interview, she also said abortions should continue in the state during the virus outbreak because the procedures were part of “life-sustaining” health care for women.
In addition, Whitmer came under fire after a no-bid coronavirus-related state contract was awarded to a firm operated by a well-known Democratic consultant who had written that President Trump should “get coronavirus ASAP.” Whitmer’s office later acknowleged that the contract was awarded without adhering to normal protocols.
Michigan House Speaker Lee Chatfield, R-Levering, explained the point of Friday’s planned session in a Twitter message.
“The House & Senate will convene tomorrow to create a special oversight committee on COVID-19 to examine our government’s response,” he wrote. “Michigan needs to handle this pandemic seriously yet properly. It’s what the people deserve, and we will see that it happens.”
In another tweet, Chatfield noted that marijuana, lottery tickets and alcohol had been declared “essential,” while lawn care, construction and fishing in a motorized boat had been declared nonessential amid the outbreak.
On Monday, Whitmer said she would take a 10 percent cut to her $159,300 annual salary and her staffers would take cuts of 5 percent as the state grapples with the financial fallout of the coronavirus shutdowns. She also continued defending the orders she has issued.
You Might Like
“I know it’s not easy, but the price of losing loved ones is what’s at stake,” she said, noting that many people who contract the virus show no symptoms but can still spread it.
The theme of Thursday’s protest in Lansing, the state’s capital city, was that many Michiganders who are able to work should be able to do so, Pannebecker said.
“Younger people, healthy people, without putting anybody else in danger, including ourselves, and others in danger, should be able to go back to work,” Pannebecker told FOX 2.
The demonstration came eight days after a larger gathering outside the Statehouse called “Operation Gridlock.”
As of late Thursday, Michigan had more than 35,200 confirmed cases of the virus and nearly 3,000 deaths, the Detroit News reported.
Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller
h/t TWS


thedcclothesline--2020-04-27--The Truth About Dr. Anthony Fauci (Video)

It seems that Dr. Anthony Fauci ’ s indiscretions are coming home to roost .
In this episode of “ Hamner It Out ” on Brighteon.com , the escapades of Dr. Anthony Fauci against his colleague , Dr. Judy Mikovits , prove he is a man without ethics , integrity or good moral character .
It proves why this man should not be advising President Trump or his administration on any medical or scientific matter whatsoever .
And , Fauci should not be proposing policy because his loyalties lie with his crony buddies , pharmaceutical companies that make vaccines , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the health of Americans .
Bottom line , the man can not be trusted .
Why he has been appointed as America ’ s doctor on coronavirus and COVID-19 based on his past behaviors is beyond the pale ?
take our poll - story continues below One has to question Trump more at this point regarding this man ’ s appointment .
And one has to question Trump ’ s actions .
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media Suzanne Hamner ( ) is a registered nurse , grandmother of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the state of Georgia , who is trying to the Christian community in her area to stand up and speak out against tyrannical government , by totalitarian political systems masquerading as religion and get back to the basics of education .

It seems that Dr. Anthony Fauci’s indiscretions are coming home to roost. In this episode of “Hamner It Out” on Brighteon.com, the escapades of Dr. Anthony Fauci against his colleague, Dr. Judy Mikovits, prove he is a man without ethics, integrity or good moral character.
It proves why this man should not be advising President Trump or his administration on any medical or scientific matter whatsoever.
And, Fauci should not be proposing policy because his loyalties lie with his crony buddies, pharmaceutical companies that make vaccines, and his own personal interests, not with the health of Americans.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Bottom line, the man cannot be trusted. Why he has been appointed as America’s doctor on coronavirus and COVID-19 based on his past behaviors is beyond the pale?
One has to question Trump more at this point regarding this man’s appointment.
And one has to question Trump’s actions.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media