thedcclothesline--2020-01-13--“You Killed Our Geniuses” – Regime Crackdown Intensifies As Iranians Flood Streets In Third Day Of P

“You Killed Our Geniuses” – Regime Crackdown Intensifies As Iranians Flood Streets In Third Day Of Protest

Despite an aggressive crackdown by the Iranian regime that reportedly included soldiers and riot police firing into crowds of civilians – in open defiance of President Trump ’ s warning to Tehran not to “ kill your protesters ” – anti-government protests over Iran ’ s mistaken shoot-down of UIA Flight 752 continued on Monday for a third straight day , following the regime ’ s admission of responsibility on Saturday .
During the protests , which erupted out of anger over the regime ’ s initial lies about Flight 752 ( it initially insisted that a “ mechanical error @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a missile strike ) , Iranian security forces fired both live ammunition and tear gas into crowds of angry demonstrators .
Some of the video and images have shown what appear to be casualties , though death tolls and counts on the number of injured have been difficult to pin down .
take our poll - story continues below As Reuters explains , the protests against the regime “ are the latest twist ” in the Trump Administration ’ s campaign of maximum pressure against Iran and its government .
Over the weekend @ @ @ @ @ @ @ messages of support for the protesters on the ground , including one tweet sent in Arabic .
Videos posted to social media on Sunday recorded gunshots in the vicinity of protests in Tehran ’ s Azadi Square .
The wounded could be seen being carried off on stretchers as riot police fired what looked like rubber bullets .
Other videos showed riot police beating protesters with batons , while others nearby screamed “ Don ’ t beat them !
” Moreover , shouts of “ Death to the dictator ” could be heard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It showed protesters shouting , directing their fury at Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the system of clerical rule .
“ They killed our geniuses and replaced them with clerics , ” demonstrators chanted at a one protest outside a university on Monday , a reference to the dozens of Iranian students who were returning to school in Canada who were aboard the flight .
Meanwhile , the chief of police in Tehran insisted that Iranian police didn ’ t shoot any protesters… … despite photos and clips that showed individuals who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ although in the aftermath of the constant fake imagery out of Syria , it is distinctly possible that these were doctored ) .
In one of the more dramatic protests , students at Tehran University reportedly shouted on Saturday that “ They are lying that our enemy is America !
Our enemy is right here !
” The regime is facing a backlash to the accidental shoot-down of Flight 752 , a strike that killed 176 passengers and crew , including 60 Canadians .
It ’ s thought that a misfiring of Iran @ @ @ @ @ @ @ down the passenger plane .
Aside from the protests , some Iranian artists have spoke out against the regime .
One famed director , Masoud Kimiai , withdrew from an upcoming international film festival .
Two state TV reporters resigned in protest over the regime ’ s initial dissembling about the cause of the accident .
Though we didn ’ t see the level of violence that characterized protests in nearby Iraq last year , the Iranian regime came out in force .
Uniformed police officers were only one arm of Iran ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in black uniforms and helmets gathered earlier Sunday in Vali-e Asr Square , at Tehran University and elsewhere .
Revolutionary Guard members patrolled the city on motorbikes , and plainclothes security men were also out in force .
According to Iran watchers , events over the weekend were an indication that the killing of General Suleimani and Iran ’ s response was truly an advantageous move for Washington and the West , as the Iranian regime hasn ’ t looked this fragile , or faced this much international condemnation in years .

Despite an aggressive crackdown by the Iranian regime that reportedly included soldiers and riot police firing into crowds of civilians – in open defiance of President Trump’s warning to Tehran not to “kill your protesters” – anti-government protests over Iran’s mistaken shoot-down of UIA Flight 752 continued on Monday for a third straight day, following the regime’s admission of responsibility on Saturday.
During the protests, which erupted out of anger over the regime’s initial lies about Flight 752 (it initially insisted that a “mechanical error” was responsible despite video evidence suggesting a missile strike), Iranian security forces fired both live ammunition and tear gas into crowds of angry demonstrators.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Some of the video and images have shown what appear to be casualties, though death tolls and counts on the number of injured have been difficult to pin down.
As Reuters explains, the protests against the regime “are the latest twist” in the Trump Administration’s campaign of maximum pressure against Iran and its government. Over the weekend, President Trump tweeted a couple of messages of support for the protesters on the ground, including one tweet sent in Arabic.
مشاور امنیت ملی امروز عنوان کرد كه تحریم ها و اعتراضات، ایران را«به شدت تحت فشار»قرار داده است و آنها را مجبور به مذاكره می كند.در واقع، اصلا برایم اهمیتی نداردکه آیا آنها مذاکره می کنند یا نه.این کاملاً به عهده ی خودشان است، اما سلاح هسته ای نداشته باشیدو«معترضان خود را نکشید.» https://t.co/DBGGs8QFcJ — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 13, 2020
To the leaders of Iran – DO NOT KILL YOUR PROTESTERS. Thousands have already been killed or imprisoned by you, and the World is watching. More importantly, the USA is watching. Turn your internet back on and let reporters roam free! Stop the killing of your great Iranian people! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 12, 2020
Videos posted to social media on Sunday recorded gunshots in the vicinity of protests in Tehran’s Azadi Square. The wounded could be seen being carried off on stretchers as riot police fired what looked like rubber bullets. Other videos showed riot police beating protesters with batons, while others nearby screamed “Don’t beat them!”
Moreover, shouts of “Death to the dictator” could be heard in footage circulating on social media. It showed protesters shouting, directing their fury at Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the system of clerical rule.
“They killed our geniuses and replaced them with clerics,” demonstrators chanted at a one protest outside a university on Monday, a reference to the dozens of Iranian students who were returning to school in Canada who were aboard the flight.
This is a brand new chant – never heard before. It’s in response to the caliber of people killed on #UkranianPlaneCrash & the people killed 40 years ago during Iran revolution “THEY KILLED
OUR GENIUSES
& REPLACED
THEM WITH CLERICS”#IranProtests #Tehran Sunday January 12th pic.twitter.com/P38zjBHu0D — SM Radio سمیرا (@SMohyeddin) January 12, 2020
Meanwhile, the chief of police in Tehran insisted that Iranian police didn’t shoot any protesters…
“At protests, police absolutely did not shoot because the capital’s police officers have been given orders to show restraint,” Hossein Rahimi, head of the Tehran police, said in a statement carried by the state broadcaster’s website.
… despite photos and clips that showed individuals who have been shot with live ammo (although in the aftermath of the constant fake imagery out of Syria, it is distinctly possible that these were doctored).
You Might Like
In one of the more dramatic protests, students at Tehran University reportedly shouted on Saturday that “They are lying that our enemy is America! Our enemy is right here!”
The regime is facing a backlash to the accidental shoot-down of Flight 752, a strike that killed 176 passengers and crew, including 60 Canadians. It’s thought that a misfiring of Iran’s Russian-made missile defense system brought down the passenger plane. Aside from the protests, some Iranian artists have spoke out against the regime. One famed director, Masoud Kimiai, withdrew from an upcoming international film festival. Two state TV reporters resigned in protest over the regime’s initial dissembling about the cause of the accident.
Though we didn’t see the level of violence that characterized protests in nearby Iraq last year, the Iranian regime came out in force. Uniformed police officers were only one arm of Iran’s vast security forces.
Riot police in black uniforms and helmets gathered earlier Sunday in Vali-e Asr Square, at Tehran University and elsewhere. Revolutionary Guard members patrolled the city on motorbikes, and plainclothes security men were also out in force.
According to Iran watchers, events over the weekend were an indication that the killing of General Suleimani and Iran’s response was truly an advantageous move for Washington and the West, as the Iranian regime hasn’t looked this fragile, or faced this much international condemnation in years.
Courtesy of Zero Hedge


thedcclothesline--2020-01-13--WikiHow goes insane with vaccine propaganda, teaches children how to “get vaccinated in secret” by s

WikiHow goes insane with vaccine propaganda, teaches children how to “get vaccinated in secret” by scheming against “anti-vaxxer” parents who WikiHow warns might “abuse” their own children

The WikiHow article , entitled , “ How to Get Vaccinated Without Parental Consent , ” begins by warning children that their parents might “ fall into rabbit holes of conspiracy theories ” about vaccines , falsely implying that all evidence of vaccine dangers or vaccine injuries is a “ conspiracy.
” The article appears at this link : The article goes on to teach children how to “ get vaccinated in secret ” and claims that anti-vaccine parents might “ abuse you if they learned that you disobeyed them.
” ( These are actual quotes from the WikiHow article @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shot from the article itself : take our poll - story continues below The article also implores children to recruit doctors “ or another responsible adult ” to coerce parents into allowing unlimited vaccinations , implying that only those adults who promote vaccines are “ responsible.
” This is yet more clear evidence that the article was written by the same group of Big Pharma propagandists who have taken over Wikipedia , too .
Many vaccines — including vaccines that contain mercury — are never tested for safety in pediatric patients ( children @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exactly those children who are being targeted by WikiHow in one of the most dangerous and brazen assaults on parental rights and child safety that has ever been hosted by any tech platform .
See the stunning photos , below , showing the actual insert sheet of a popular flu vaccine for more proof .
This article is so dangerous to public health that WikiHow deserves to be sued by parents and criminally investigated for publishing it .
U.S. government confirms billions have been paid out to families of vaccine injured children – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ truth , vaccine insert sheets openly admit that vaccines are dangerous and , in most cases , never even subjected to clinical trials for safety or effectiveness .
These damning facts about vaccine safety are never mentioned by WikiHow .
The so-called “ Secret Vaccine Court ” ( the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program ) has already paid out over $ 4 billion to families of vaccine-injured children , and more claims are filed each year .
That program publishes a “ vaccine injury table ” that lists some of the many injuries @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The program also reveals that , as of 2019 , over $ 4 billion has been paid out to families of vaccine-injured children : Since 1988 , over 21,491 petitions have been filed with the VICP .
Over that 30-year time period , 18,473 petitions have been adjudicated , with 7,044 of those determined to be compensable , while 11,429 were dismissed .
Total compensation paid over the life of the program is approximately $ 4.2 billion .
A detailed PDF report published by the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program lists the influenza @ @ @ @ @ @ @ injury petitions , and the MMR vaccine responsible for 252 petition .
The Tdap vaccine accounts for another 470 petitions .
The report reveals that more petitions were filed in 2019 than in almost any other year in the program ’ s existence , demonstrating that vaccines are trending toward causing more injury , not less .
WikiHow glosses over the fact that most vaccines have never been clinically tested for safety or effectiveness The WikiHow article tries to brainwash children into thinking that vaccines are universally safe and effective when , in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccines are backed by no real science at all .
For example , the Flulaval vaccine insert sheet , detailed in this Natural News article , reveals that no controlled trials have been conducted that show the flu shot results in any decrease whatsoever in influenza infections : The highlighted text reads , “ …there have been no controlled trials adequately demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with FLULAVAL.
” Furthermore , that same insert sheet openly admits that the safety of the flu shot — which contains mercury — has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , this is the exact same demographic being targeted by WikiHow in their article that attempts to convince children to lie to their parents and get secretly vaccinated with toxic vaccines that may quite literally kill them : “ Safety and effectiveness of FLULAVAL in pediatric patients have not been established.
” “ FLULAVAL has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential , or for impairment of fertility.
” “ Thimerosal , a mercury derivative , is added as a preservative .
Each … dose contains 50 mcg thimerosal .
Each dose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , formaldehyde , and sodium deoxycholate from the manufacturing process.
” WikiHow implores children : “ You are allowed to lie to your parents ” by using a “ cover story ” In step 3 of the WikiHow scheme for children to deceive their parents and get vaccinated without parental consent , the site urges children to lie to their parents : You are allowed to lie to your parents if it ’ s the only way you can get the information you need to protect your health .
Later , you can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you don ’ t have a vaccine injury .
Of course , the WikiHow article fails to tell the reader that getting vaccinated may cause them to end up with paralysis , a coma or death , all of which would prohibit them from being able to explain later that “ you don ’ t have a vaccine injury.
” ( Children killed by vaccines are unable to talk about their vaccine injuries , it turns out . )
The WikiHow article also proposes various lies that children and teens can use on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your parents are distrustful , prepare your cover story especially well.
” Young readers are urged to literally stage a fake photo shoot of their “ cover story ” activity so they can prove to their dangerous , distrustful parents that they actually participated in that activity rather than being vaccinated .
From the WikiHow article : If your parents are distrustful , prepare your cover story especially well .
Try actually doing your cover story activity on a different day , and even taking a selfie doing that thing with your friend @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have “ evidence ” of doing it , and can answer questions if they quiz you .
Vaccine industry using Big Tech platforms to try to weaponize children against their own parents and function as subjects of the “ vaccine state ” The blatant propaganda article by WikiHow blatantly seeks to turn children against their own parents while surrendering to the “ vaccine state ” which systematically lies to the public about the safety or efficacy of vaccines .
The WikiHow article names no authors and says it was written by anonymous contributors @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the vaccine industry itself .
The article goes on to state that children should “ Get vaccinated in secret ” or “ petition the court for emancipation if your parents are really bad.
” It also urges children to leverage their doctors against their “ anti-vaxxer parents , ” explaining : If you think that your parents might have told you something false , you can relate what they said to the doctor , and ask if it ’ s a myth .
Finally , WikiHow tells young readers they should reward @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bar after lying to their parents , staging a fake cover story and conspiring with ( pharma-bribed ) doctors to get vaccinated with dangerous , life-threatening vaccines .
“ Buy a treat , like ice cream from your favorite place , ” says WikiHow .
WikiHow encourages young readers to expose family members to “ viral shedding ” that can spread infections and compromise the health of the elderly After being vaccinated , readers are advised to continue lying to their parents , even though many vaccines cause “ viral shedding ” that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ live viruses used in the vaccine themselves .
“ Remember that you don ’ t have to tell your parents about getting vaccinated , ” says WikiHow .
“ You can keep your health choices to yourself , especially if they would be mean to you or make you feel unsafe as a result of your choices , ” once again implying that anti-vaxxer parents are somehow violent child abusers when , in reality , it ’ s the vaccine industry that commits routine violence against children .
The “ Community Q & @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claims that all people who rationally discuss vaccine injuries , harmful vaccine ingredients and vaccine risks are “ snake-oil peddlers ” who “ distrust authority ” and are engaged in “ conspiracy theories.
” The tech giants are now run by Big Pharma and the vaccine deep state as America collapses into a “ pharma state ” WikiHow ’ s descent into vaccine propaganda is little surprise , given that Google , Facebook , Twitter , Vimeo , Pinterest , YouTube and all the other prominent tech platforms have also surrendered to Big @ @ @ @ @ @ @ All rational voices that raise awareness of vaccine injuries , vaccine ingredients or vaccine safety are instantly de-platformed across all prominent tech platforms .
All those who dare to question vaccines are immediately deemed irrational , dishonest or dangerous to society .
The tech giants now universally enforce the big three lies of the vaccine industry : Lie # 1 ) All vaccines are safe and never harm anyone .
Lie # 2 ) All vaccines work and never fail .
Lie # 3 ) All vaccines are clinically tested for safety and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of those lies are true , of course , which is why the tech giants must resort to censorship and slander to try to silence the voices of reason that are armed with real facts about the very real dangers of vaccines .
Watch my mini-documentary below to learn how America has collapsed into a “ pharma state ” that ’ s run by the pharmaceutical / vaccine cartels : What ’ s next ?
Will Wikihow teach children how to cut off their own genitals in secret DIY transgenderism experiments ?
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all this is going .
Soon , WikiHow will likely join the DIY transgenderism movement and probably host another how-to article entitled something like , “ How to secretly cut off your penis and become a transgender without your parents knowing about it.
” Beware of any tech platform that surreptitiously pits children against their own parents while promoting the propaganda of the vaccine cartels and government “ authorities.
” How to complain to WikiHow for publishing this extremely dangerous , irresponsible article that puts the lives of children at risk while weaponizing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their how-to articles can be edited by the public .
Have no illusions that , just like with Wikipedia , this claim is a complete scam and all article editing is tightly controlled by a monopoly of malicious individuals who are obviously working for the pharma cartels and the malicious vaccine industry .
However , if you wish to attempt to edit this WikiHow article , you can do so at this link : You can also post feedback to the article authors by clicking the “ Send fan mail to authors ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , there is a Yes / No voting box at the very bottom of the article page , below the Q & A section .
A question there reads , “ Did this article help you ?
” You can vote YES or NO .
The bottom line ?
WikiHow is now the enemy of children , just like Google is the enemy of human knowledge and Twitter is an enemy of humanity .

(Natural News) The WikiHow website, a hub for how-to information, has joined the other evil tech giants by going all-in with vaccine propaganda that poses a very real danger to the health and safety of children. The site now features a dangerous article that teaches children how to scheme against their own parents and stage fake cover stories to get vaccinated with toxic vaccines that even the U.S. government admits cause thousands of injuries, hospitalizations and even some deaths every year in America. (VAERS.HHS.gov and HRSA.gov)
The WikiHow article, entitled, “How to Get Vaccinated Without Parental Consent,” begins by warning children that their parents might “fall into rabbit holes of conspiracy theories” about vaccines, falsely implying that all evidence of vaccine dangers or vaccine injuries is a “conspiracy.” The article appears at this link:
https://www.wikihow.com/Get-Vaccinated-Without-Parental-Consent
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The article goes on to teach children how to “get vaccinated in secret” and claims that anti-vaccine parents might “abuse you if they learned that you disobeyed them.” (These are actual quotes from the WikiHow article.) Here’s a screen shot from the article itself:
The article also implores children to recruit doctors “or another responsible adult” to coerce parents into allowing unlimited vaccinations, implying that only those adults who promote vaccines are “responsible.” This is yet more clear evidence that the article was written by the same group of Big Pharma propagandists who have taken over Wikipedia, too.
Many vaccines — including vaccines that contain mercury — are never tested for safety in pediatric patients (children and teens), yet it is exactly those children who are being targeted by WikiHow in one of the most dangerous and brazen assaults on parental rights and child safety that has ever been hosted by any tech platform. See the stunning photos, below, showing the actual insert sheet of a popular flu vaccine for more proof.
This article is so dangerous to public health that WikiHow deserves to be sued by parents and criminally investigated for publishing it.
U.S. government confirms billions have been paid out to families of vaccine injured children – an irrefutable fact denied by WikiHow
In truth, vaccine insert sheets openly admit that vaccines are dangerous and, in most cases, never even subjected to clinical trials for safety or effectiveness. These damning facts about vaccine safety are never mentioned by WikiHow.
The so-called “Secret Vaccine Court” (the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program) has already paid out over $4 billion to families of vaccine-injured children, and more claims are filed each year.
That program publishes a “vaccine injury table” that lists some of the many injuries known to be caused by vaccines.
The program also reveals that, as of 2019, over $4 billion has been paid out to families of vaccine-injured children:
Since 1988, over 21,491 petitions have been filed with the VICP. Over that 30-year time period, 18,473 petitions have been adjudicated, with 7,044 of those determined to be compensable, while 11,429 were dismissed. Total compensation paid over the life of the program is approximately $4.2 billion.
A detailed PDF report published by the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program lists the influenza vaccine as responsible for 3,647 of the injury petitions, and the MMR vaccine responsible for 252 petition. The Tdap vaccine accounts for another 470 petitions. The report reveals that more petitions were filed in 2019 than in almost any other year in the program’s existence, demonstrating that vaccines are trending toward causing more injury, not less.
WikiHow glosses over the fact that most vaccines have never been clinically tested for safety or effectiveness
The WikiHow article tries to brainwash children into thinking that vaccines are universally safe and effective when, in reality, vaccine manufacturers openly admit their vaccines are backed by no real science at all.
You Might Like
For example, the Flulaval vaccine insert sheet, detailed in this Natural News article, reveals that no controlled trials have been conducted that show the flu shot results in any decrease whatsoever in influenza infections:
The highlighted text reads, “…there have been no controlled trials adequately demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with FLULAVAL.”
Furthermore, that same insert sheet openly admits that the safety of the flu shot — which contains mercury — has never been established in children. Notably, this is the exact same demographic being targeted by WikiHow in their article that attempts to convince children to lie to their parents and get secretly vaccinated with toxic vaccines that may quite literally kill them:
“Safety and effectiveness of FLULAVAL in pediatric patients have not been established.”
“FLULAVAL has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.”
“Thimerosal, a mercury derivative, is added as a preservative. Each … dose contains 50 mcg thimerosal. Each dose may also contain residual amounts of ovalbumin, formaldehyde, and sodium deoxycholate from the manufacturing process.”
WikiHow implores children: “You are allowed to lie to your parents” by using a “cover story”
In step 3 of the WikiHow scheme for children to deceive their parents and get vaccinated without parental consent, the site urges children to lie to their parents:
You are allowed to lie to your parents if it’s the only way you can get the information you need to protect your health. Later, you can say that you researched it and realized you don’t have a vaccine injury.
Of course, the WikiHow article fails to tell the reader that getting vaccinated may cause them to end up with paralysis, a coma or death, all of which would prohibit them from being able to explain later that “you don’t have a vaccine injury.” (Children killed by vaccines are unable to talk about their vaccine injuries, it turns out.)
The WikiHow article also proposes various lies that children and teens can use on their parents, saying, “If your parents are distrustful, prepare your cover story especially well.”
Young readers are urged to literally stage a fake photo shoot of their “cover story” activity so they can prove to their dangerous, distrustful parents that they actually participated in that activity rather than being vaccinated. From the WikiHow article:
If your parents are distrustful, prepare your cover story especially well. Try actually doing your cover story activity on a different day, and even taking a selfie doing that thing with your friend. This way, you’ll have “evidence” of doing it, and can answer questions if they quiz you.
Vaccine industry using Big Tech platforms to try to weaponize children against their own parents and function as subjects of the “vaccine state”
The blatant propaganda article by WikiHow blatantly seeks to turn children against their own parents while surrendering to the “vaccine state” which systematically lies to the public about the safety or efficacy of vaccines. The WikiHow article names no authors and says it was written by anonymous contributors, most of whom no doubt work for the vaccine industry itself.
The article goes on to state that children should “Get vaccinated in secret” or “petition the court for emancipation if your parents are really bad.”
It also urges children to leverage their doctors against their “anti-vaxxer parents,” explaining:
If you think that your parents might have told you something false, you can relate what they said to the doctor, and ask if it’s a myth.
Finally, WikiHow tells young readers they should reward themselves with ice cream or a candy bar after lying to their parents, staging a fake cover story and conspiring with (pharma-bribed) doctors to get vaccinated with dangerous, life-threatening vaccines. “Buy a treat, like ice cream from your favorite place,” says WikiHow.
WikiHow encourages young readers to expose family members to “viral shedding” that can spread infections and compromise the health of the elderly
After being vaccinated, readers are advised to continue lying to their parents, even though many vaccines cause “viral shedding” that can expose family members to the same live viruses used in the vaccine themselves.
“Remember that you don’t have to tell your parents about getting vaccinated,” says WikiHow. “You can keep your health choices to yourself, especially if they would be mean to you or make you feel unsafe as a result of your choices,” once again implying that anti-vaxxer parents are somehow violent child abusers when, in reality, it’s the vaccine industry that commits routine violence against children.
The “Community Q&A” section below the WikiHow article claims that all people who rationally discuss vaccine injuries, harmful vaccine ingredients and vaccine risks are “snake-oil peddlers” who “distrust authority” and are engaged in “conspiracy theories.”
The tech giants are now run by Big Pharma and the vaccine deep state as America collapses into a “pharma state”
WikiHow’s descent into vaccine propaganda is little surprise, given that Google, Facebook, Twitter, Vimeo, Pinterest, YouTube and all the other prominent tech platforms have also surrendered to Big Pharma and the criminal vaccine industry.
All rational voices that raise awareness of vaccine injuries, vaccine ingredients or vaccine safety are instantly de-platformed across all prominent tech platforms.
All those who dare to question vaccines are immediately deemed irrational, dishonest or dangerous to society.
The tech giants now universally enforce the big three lies of the vaccine industry:
Lie #1) All vaccines are safe and never harm anyone.
Lie #2) All vaccines work and never fail.
Lie #3) All vaccines are clinically tested for safety and rooted in solid scientific testing.
None of those lies are true, of course, which is why the tech giants must resort to censorship and slander to try to silence the voices of reason that are armed with real facts about the very real dangers of vaccines.
Watch my mini-documentary below to learn how America has collapsed into a “pharma state” that’s run by the pharmaceutical / vaccine cartels:
What’s next? Will Wikihow teach children how to cut off their own genitals in secret DIY transgenderism experiments?
It’s not hard to see where all this is going. Soon, WikiHow will likely join the DIY transgenderism movement and probably host another how-to article entitled something like, “How to secretly cut off your penis and become a transgender without your parents knowing about it.”
Beware of any tech platform that surreptitiously pits children against their own parents while promoting the propaganda of the vaccine cartels and government “authorities.”
How to complain to WikiHow for publishing this extremely dangerous, irresponsible article that puts the lives of children at risk while weaponizing children against their own parents
WikiHow claims their how-to articles can be edited by the public. Have no illusions that, just like with Wikipedia, this claim is a complete scam and all article editing is tightly controlled by a monopoly of malicious individuals who are obviously working for the pharma cartels and the malicious vaccine industry.
However, if you wish to attempt to edit this WikiHow article, you can do so at this link:
https://www.wikihow.com/Get-Vaccinated-Without-Parental-Consent#edit
You can also post feedback to the article authors by clicking the “Send fan mail to authors” link below the article itself.
Finally, there is a Yes / No voting box at the very bottom of the article page, below the Q&A section. A question there reads, “Did this article help you?” You can vote YES or NO.
The bottom line? WikiHow is now the enemy of children, just like Google is the enemy of human knowledge and Twitter is an enemy of humanity.


thedcclothesline--2020-01-14--VACCINE BOMBSHELL as U.N. health experts admit toxic vaccine ingredients are harming children worldw

VACCINE BOMBSHELL as U.N. health experts admit toxic vaccine ingredients are harming children worldwide – see video, transcript

( Natural News ) A Dec. 2 , 2019 World Health Organization “ Global Vaccine Safety Summit ” video has been found and leaked to the world , revealing shocking admissions of the health hazards posed by vaccines and their toxic ingredients .
A first-wave compilation of some of the more damning quotes was created by Del Bigtree ’ s “ Highwire ” organization , which posted the video to YouTube .
Knowing that video would quickly be banned , we posted it to Brighteon.com , where “ Highwire ” is expected to launch a channel very soon .
You @ @ @ @ @ @ @ link on Brighteon .
For a related article that covers this , see this link at TheHighWire.com .
A full transcript of this video compilation is offered below .
Watch the video here , via Brighteon : take our poll - story continues below Some of the highlights : An admission that vaccine adjuvants increase cell death and damage to vaccine recipients .
For this paragraph , the term “ reactogenicity ” means vaccine adverse reactions and side effects , including those that are known to be extremely harmful and cause long-term damage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Professor of Pharmacoepidemiology – It seems to me that adjuvants multiply the immunogenicity of the antigens that they are added to , and that is their intention .
It seems to me they multiply the reactogenicity in many instances , and therefore it seems to me that it is not unexpected if they multiply the incidence of adverse reactions that are associated with the antigen… Dr. Martin Howell Friede – You are correct .
As we add adjuvants , especially some of the more recent adjuvants , such as the ASO1 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ local reactogenicity… The major health concern which we are seeing are accusations of long term , long term effects .
An admission that the W.H.O .
is panicking over the fact that many doctors and nurses are finally starting to question the safety and vaccines and are becoming aware of the coordinated cover-up of vaccine injuries : Prof. Heidi Larson , PhD , Director of the Vaccine Confidence Project – We have a very wobbly health professional front line that is starting to question vaccines and the safety of vaccines .
When the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or they don ’ t feel like they have enough confidence about the safety to stand up to it to the person asking them the questions .
I mean most medical school curriculums , even nursing curriculums , I mean in medical school you ’ re lucky if you have a half-day on vaccines .
Never mind keeping up to date with all this .
Also from Prof. Heidi Larson , PhD – You can ’ t repurpose the same old science to make it sound better if you don ’ t have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the new problem .
So we need much more investment in safety science .
An admission that vaccine clinical trials are insufficient and that vaccines are approved without adequate safety data .
Also admits that vaccines damage children far more than they damage elderly adults : Dr. Marion Gruber – Director , Office of Vaccines Research and Review Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research .
FDA – And again as you mentioned pre-licensure clinical trials may not be powered enough .
It ’ s also the subject population that you administer the adjuvant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ presented to us where an adjuvant , a particular adjuvant added to a vaccine antigen did really nothing when administered to a certain population and usually the elderly , you know , compared to administering the same formulation to younger age strata .
A warning about the lack of vaccine safety monitoring systems around the world : Dr. Soumya Swaminathan , M.D.
, Chief Scientist , W.H.O.
, Pediatrician – I think we can not overemphasize the fact that we really don ’ t havevery good safety monitoring systems in many countries , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the misapprehensions because we ’ re not able to give clear-cut answers when people ask questions about the deaths that have occurred due to a particular vaccine… Here ’ s an admission that viral fragments don ’ t work as promised by immunization theory and that it ’ s the adjuvants which are responsible for the inflammatory response to vaccines .
In other words , vaccine science as described by the vaccine establishment , is quackery : Dr. Martin Howell Friede , Coordinator , Initiative for Vaccine Research , W.H.O .
– Without @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have the next generation of vaccines .
And many of the vaccines that we do have , ranging from tetanus through to HPV require adjuvants in order for them to work .
We do not add adjuvants to vaccines because we want to do so .
An admission that vaccine safety tracking systems don ’ t even exist and that efforts to build such systems are only just beginning : Dr. Robert Chen , M.D .
– Scientific Director , Brighton Collaboration – [ W ] e ’ re really only in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sets where hopefully you could start to kind of harmonize the databases for multiple studies .
And there ’ s actually an initiative underway… Helen there may want to comment on it to try to get more national vaccine safety database linked together so we could start to answer these types of questions that you just raised .
Full transcript of what ’ s on this video – there ’ s a lot more yet to come CAUGHT ON CAMERA : W.H.O Scientists Question Safety Of Vaccines Prof. Heidi Larson , PhD , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Project There ’ s a lot of safety science that ’ s needed , and without the good science , we can ’ t have good communication .
Although I ’ m talking about all these other contextual issues , and communication issues it absolutely needs the science as the backbone .
You can ’ t repurpose the same old science to make it sound better if you don ’ t have the science that ’ s relevant to the new problem .
So we need much more investment in safety science .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Scientist , W.H.O.
, Pediatrician I think we can not overemphasize the fact that we really don ’ t have very good safety monitoring systems in many countries , and this adds to the miscommunication and the misapprehensions because we ’ re not able to give clear-cut answers when people ask questions about the deaths that have occurred due to a particular vaccine , and this always gets blown up in the media .
One should be able to give a very factual account of what exactly has happened and what the cause @ @ @ @ @ @ @ most cases there is some obfuscation at that level and therefore , there ’ s less and less trust then in the system .
Dr. Martin Howell Friede , Coordinator , Initiative for Vaccine Research , W.H.O .
Every time that there is an association , be it temporal or not temporal , the first accusation is it is the adjuvant .
And yet , without adjuvants , we are not going to have the next generation of vaccines .
And many of the vaccines that we do have , ranging from tetanus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for them to work .
So the challenge that we have in front of us is : How do we build confidence in this ?
And the confidence first of all comes from the regulatory agencies ( I look to Marion ) .
When we add an adjuvant it ’ s because it is essential .
We do not add adjuvants to vaccines because we want to do so .
But when we add them , it adds to the complexity .
I give courses every year on “ How do you develop @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you make vaccines ?
” And the first lesson is , while you ’ re making your vaccine , if you can avoid using an adjuvant , please do so .
Lesson two is , if you ’ re going to use an adjuvant , use one that has a history of safety .
And lesson three is , if you ’ re not going to do that , think very carefully .
Dr. Stephen Evans , Professor of Pharmacoepidemiology It seems to me that adjuvants multiply the immunogenicity of the antigens that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is their intention .
It seems to me they multiply the reactogenicity in many instances , and therefore it seems to me that it is not unexpected if they multiply the incidence of adverse reactions that are associated with the antigen , but may not have been detected through lack of statistical power in the original studies .
Dr. Martin Howell Friede You are correct .
As we add adjuvants , especially some of the more recent adjuvants , such as the ASO1 , saponin-derived adjuvants , we do see increased local reactogenicity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ usually is systemic adverse events rather than local adverse events .
And we tend to get in the Phase II and the Phase III studies quite good data on the local reactogenicity .
Those of us in this room that are beyond the age of 50 who have had the pleasure of having the recent shingles vaccine , will know that this does have quite significant local reactogenicity .
If you got the vaccine , you know that you got the vaccine .
But this is not the major health concern .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are accusations of long term , long term effects .
So to come back to this , I ’ m going to once again point to the regulators .
It comes down to ensuring that we conduct Phase II and the Phase III studies with adequate size and with the appropriate measurement .
Dr. David Kaslow , M.D .
– V.P.
, Essential Medicines , Drug Development program PATH Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access ( CVIA ) So in our clinical trials , we are actually using relatively small sample sizes , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ re at risk of tyranny of small numbers , which is , you just need a single case of Wegener ’ s Granulomatosis , and your vaccine has to , solve Walt ’ s , How do you prove a null Hypothesis ?
…And it takes years and years to try to figure that out .
It ’ s a real conundrum , right ?
Getting the right size , dealing with the tyranny of small numbers , making sure that you can really do it .
And so I think one of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ invest in are kind of better biomarkers , better mechanistic understanding of how these things work so we can better understand adverse events as they come up .
Dr. Marion Gruber – Director , Office of Vaccines Research and Review Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research .
FDA One of the additional issues that complicates safety evaluation is that if you look at , and you struggle with the length of follow-up that should be adequate in a , let ’ s say a pre-licensure or even post-marketing study if that ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mentioned pre-licensure clinical trials may not be powered enough .
It ’ s also the subject population that you administer the adjuvant to because we ’ ve seen data presented to us where an adjuvant , a particular adjuvant added to a vaccine antigen did really nothing when administered to a certain population and usually the elderly , you know , compared to administering the same formulation to younger age strata .
So these are things which need to be considered as well and further complicate safety and effectiveness evaluation of adjuvants combined @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – Program Manager , National Emergency Routine Immunization Coordination Centre ( NERICC ) .
Abuja , Nigeria I cast back my mind to our situation in Nigeria where at six weeks , ten weeks , fourteen weeks , a child is being given different antigens from different companies , and these vaccines have different adjuvants and different preservatives and so on .
Something crosses my mind… is there possibility of these adjuvants , preservatives , cross-reacting amongst themselves ?
Have there ever been a study on the possibility of cross-reactions on from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with us ?
Dr. Robert Chen , M.D .
– Scientific Director , Brighton Collaboration Now the only way to tease that out is if you have a large population database like the vaccine safety datalink as well as some of the other national databases that are coming to being worthy .
Actual vaccine exposure is trapped down to that level of specificity of who is the manufacturer ?
What is the lot number ?
Etc..etc .
And there ’ s an initiative to try to make the vaccine label information bar-coded so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
So that in the future when we do these type of studies , we are able to tease that out .
And in order to be – each time you subdivide them , the sample size gets becoming more and more challenging and that ’ s what I said earlier today about that we ’ re really only in the beginning of the era of large data sets where hopefully you could start to kind of harmonize the databases for multiple studies .
And there ’ s actually an initiative underway… Helen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to try to get more national vaccine safety database linked together so we could start to answer these types of questions that you just raised .
Prof. Heidi Larson , PhD The other thing that ’ s a trend and an issue is not just confidence in providers but confidence of health care providers .
We have a very wobbly health professional front line that is starting to question vaccines and the safety of vaccines .
When the front line professionals are starting to question or they don ’ t feel like they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stand up to it to the person asking them the questions .
I mean most medical school curriculums , even nursing curriculums , I mean in medical school you ’ re lucky if you have a half-day on vaccines .
Never mind keeping up to date with all this .

(Natural News) A Dec. 2, 2019 World Health Organization “Global Vaccine Safety Summit” video has been found and leaked to the world, revealing shocking admissions of the health hazards posed by vaccines and their toxic ingredients.
A first-wave compilation of some of the more damning quotes was created by Del Bigtree’s “Highwire” organization, which posted the video to YouTube. Knowing that video would quickly be banned, we posted it to Brighteon.com, where “Highwire” is expected to launch a channel very soon.
You can watch the full video at this link on Brighteon. For a related article that covers this, see this link at TheHighWire.com.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
A full transcript of this video compilation is offered below. Watch the video here, via Brighteon:
Some of the highlights:
An admission that vaccine adjuvants increase cell death and damage to vaccine recipients. For this paragraph, the term “reactogenicity” means vaccine adverse reactions and side effects, including those that are known to be extremely harmful and cause long-term damage or even death:
Dr. Stephen Evans, Professor of Pharmacoepidemiology – It seems to me that adjuvants multiply the immunogenicity of the antigens that they are added to, and that is their intention. It seems to me they multiply the reactogenicity in many instances, and therefore it seems to me that it is not unexpected if they multiply the incidence of adverse reactions that are associated with the antigen…
Warnings about long-term effects from vaccine adjuvants:
Dr. Martin Howell Friede – You are correct. As we add adjuvants, especially some of the more recent adjuvants, such as the ASO1, saponin-derived adjuvants , we do see increased local reactogenicity… The major health concern which we are seeing are accusations of long term, long term effects.
An admission that the W.H.O. is panicking over the fact that many doctors and nurses are finally starting to question the safety and vaccines and are becoming aware of the coordinated cover-up of vaccine injuries:
Prof. Heidi Larson, PhD, Director of the Vaccine Confidence Project – We have a very wobbly health professional front line that is starting to question vaccines and the safety of vaccines. When the front line professionals are starting to question or they don’t feel like they have enough confidence about the safety to stand up to it to the person asking them the questions. I mean most medical school curriculums, even nursing curriculums, I mean in medical school you’re lucky if you have a half-day on vaccines. Never mind keeping up to date with all this.
Also from Prof. Heidi Larson, PhD – You can’t repurpose the same old science to make it sound better if you don’t have the science that’s relevant to the new problem. So we need much more investment in safety science.
An admission that vaccine clinical trials are insufficient and that vaccines are approved without adequate safety data. Also admits that vaccines damage children far more than they damage elderly adults:
Dr. Marion Gruber – Director, Office of Vaccines Research and Review Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. FDA – And again as you mentioned pre-licensure clinical trials may not be powered enough. It’s also the subject population that you administer the adjuvant to because we’ve seen data presented to us where an adjuvant, a particular adjuvant added to a vaccine antigen did really nothing when administered to a certain population and usually the elderly, you know, compared to administering the same formulation to younger age strata.
A warning about the lack of vaccine safety monitoring systems around the world:
You Might Like
Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, M.D., Chief Scientist, W.H.O., Pediatrician – I think we cannot overemphasize the fact that we really don’t havevery good safety monitoring systems in many countries, and this adds to the miscommunication and the misapprehensions because we’re not able to give clear-cut answers when people ask questions about the deaths that have occurred due to a particular vaccine…
Here’s an admission that viral fragments don’t work as promised by immunization theory and that it’s the adjuvants which are responsible for the inflammatory response to vaccines. In other words, vaccine science as described by the vaccine establishment, is quackery:
Dr. Martin Howell Friede, Coordinator, Initiative for Vaccine Research, W.H.O. – Without adjuvants, we are not going to have the next generation of vaccines. And many of the vaccines that we do have, ranging from tetanus through to HPV require adjuvants in order for them to work. We do not add adjuvants to vaccines because we want to do so.
An admission that vaccine safety tracking systems don’t even exist and that efforts to build such systems are only just beginning:
Dr. Robert Chen, M.D. – Scientific Director, Brighton Collaboration – [W]e’re really only in the beginning of the era of large data sets where hopefully you could start to kind of harmonize the databases for multiple studies. And there’s actually an initiative underway… Helen there may want to comment on it to try to get more national vaccine safety database linked together so we could start to answer these types of questions that you just raised.
Full transcript of what’s on this video – there’s a lot more yet to come
CAUGHT ON CAMERA: W.H.O Scientists Question Safety Of Vaccines
Prof. Heidi Larson, PhD, Anthropologist, Director of the Vaccine Confidence Project
There’s a lot of safety science that’s needed, and without the good science, we can’t have good communication. Although I’m talking about all these other contextual issues, and communication issues it absolutely needs the science as the backbone. You can’t repurpose the same old science to make it sound better if you don’t have the science that’s relevant to the new problem. So we need much more investment in safety science.
Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, M.D., Chief Scientist, W.H.O., Pediatrician
I think we cannot overemphasize the fact that we really don’t have very good safety monitoring systems in many countries, and this adds to the miscommunication and the misapprehensions because we’re not able to give clear-cut answers when people ask questions about the deaths that have occurred due to a particular vaccine, and this always gets blown up in the media. One should be able to give a very factual account of what exactly has happened and what the cause of the deaths are, but in most cases there is some obfuscation at that level and therefore, there’s less and less trust then in the system.
Dr. Martin Howell Friede, Coordinator, Initiative for Vaccine Research, W.H.O.
Every time that there is an association, be it temporal or not temporal, the first accusation is it is the adjuvant. And yet, without adjuvants, we are not going to have the next generation of vaccines. And many of the vaccines that we do have, ranging from tetanus through to HPV require adjuvants in order for them to work. So the challenge that we have in front of us is: How do we build confidence in this? And the confidence first of all comes from the regulatory agencies (I look to Marion). When we add an adjuvant it’s because it is essential. We do not add adjuvants to vaccines because we want to do so. But when we add them, it adds to the complexity. I give courses every year on “How do you develop vaccines?”, “How do you make vaccines?” And the first lesson is, while you’re making your vaccine, if you can avoid using an adjuvant, please do so. Lesson two is, if you’re going to use an adjuvant, use one that has a history of safety. And lesson three is, if you’re not going to do that, think very carefully.
Dr. Stephen Evans, Professor of Pharmacoepidemiology
It seems to me that adjuvants multiply the immunogenicity of the antigens that they are added to, and that is their intention. It seems to me they multiply the reactogenicity in many instances, and therefore it seems to me that it is not unexpected if they multiply the incidence of adverse reactions that are associated with the antigen, but may not have been detected through lack of statistical power in the original studies.
Dr. Martin Howell Friede
You are correct. As we add adjuvants, especially some of the more recent adjuvants, such as the ASO1, saponin-derived adjuvants , we do see increased local reactogenicity. The primary concern, though, usually is systemic adverse events rather than local adverse events. And we tend to get in the Phase II and the Phase III studies quite good data on the local reactogenicity. Those of us in this room that are beyond the age of 50 who have had the pleasure of having the recent shingles vaccine, will know that this does have quite significant local reactogenicity. If you got the vaccine, you know that you got the vaccine. But this is not the major health concern. The major health concern which we are seeing are accusations of long term, long term effects. So to come back to this, I’m going to once again point to the regulators. It comes down to ensuring that we conduct Phase II and the Phase III studies with adequate size and with the appropriate measurement.
Dr. David Kaslow, M.D. – V.P., Essential Medicines, Drug Development program PATH Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access (CVIA)
So in our clinical trials, we are actually using relatively small sample sizes, and when we do that we’re at risk of tyranny of small numbers, which is, you just need a single case of Wegener’s Granulomatosis, and your vaccine has to, solve Walt’s, How do you prove a null Hypothesis? …And it takes years and years to try to figure that out. It’s a real conundrum, right? Getting the right size, dealing with the tyranny of small numbers, making sure that you can really do it. And so I think one of the things that we really need to invest in are kind of better biomarkers, better mechanistic understanding of how these things work so we can better understand adverse events as they come up.
Dr. Marion Gruber – Director, Office of Vaccines Research and Review Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. FDA
One of the additional issues that complicates safety evaluation is that if you look at, and you struggle with the length of follow-up that should be adequate in a, let’s say a pre-licensure or even post-marketing study if that’s even possible. And again as you mentioned pre-licensure clinical trials may not be powered enough. It’s also the subject population that you administer the adjuvant to because we’ve seen data presented to us where an adjuvant, a particular adjuvant added to a vaccine antigen did really nothing when administered to a certain population and usually the elderly, you know, compared to administering the same formulation to younger age strata. So these are things which need to be considered as well and further complicate safety and effectiveness evaluation of adjuvants combined with vaccine antigens.
Dr. Bassey Okposen – Program Manager, National Emergency Routine Immunization Coordination Centre (NERICC). Abuja, Nigeria
I cast back my mind to our situation in Nigeria where at six weeks, ten weeks, fourteen weeks, a child is being given different antigens from different companies, and these vaccines have different adjuvants and different preservatives and so on. Something crosses my mind… is there possibility of these adjuvants, preservatives, cross-reacting amongst themselves? Have there ever been a study on the possibility of cross-reactions on from the past that you can share the experience with us?
Dr. Robert Chen, M.D. – Scientific Director, Brighton Collaboration
Now the only way to tease that out is if you have a large population database like the vaccine safety datalink as well as some of the other national databases that are coming to being worthy. Actual vaccine exposure is trapped down to that level of specificity of who is the manufacturer? What is the lot number? Etc..etc. And there’s an initiative to try to make the vaccine label information bar-coded so that it includes that level of information. So that in the future when we do these type of studies, we are able to tease that out. And in order to be – each time you subdivide them, the sample size gets becoming more and more challenging and that’s what I said earlier today about that we’re really only in the beginning of the era of large data sets where hopefully you could start to kind of harmonize the databases for multiple studies. And there’s actually an initiative underway… Helen there may want to comment on it to try to get more national vaccine safety database linked together so we could start to answer these types of questions that you just raised.
Prof. Heidi Larson, PhD
The other thing that’s a trend and an issue is not just confidence in providers but confidence of health care providers. We have a very wobbly health professional front line that is starting to question vaccines and the safety of vaccines. When the front line professionals are starting to question or they don’t feel like they have enough confidence about the safety to stand up to it to the person asking them the questions. I mean most medical school curriculums, even nursing curriculums, I mean in medical school you’re lucky if you have a half-day on vaccines. Never mind keeping up to date with all this.
Watch the full video at Brighteon.com:
https://www.brighteon.com/3dec332d-fd96-4654-a72f-55b702bd9262


thedcclothesline--2020-01-15--West Virginia Invites Virginia 2A Counties to Join The Mountain State

The plot thickens with the 2A battle in Virginia .
West Virginia is now early in the process of inviting Virginia ’ s counties to secede and be annexed to West Virginia .
WSET reports that the first official invitation has been delivered to Frederick County , VA .
The West Virginia Senate adopted a resolution by voice vote Monday to remind residents of Frederick County , Virginia , that the county has a standing invite — from 1862 — to become part of West Virginia .
It now goes to the House of Delegates .
take our poll - @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by Morgan County Republican Charles Trump , whose district borders Frederick County .
Trump was born in Winchester , the seat of Frederick , which is Virginia ’ s northernmost county .
A message left for Frederick County Board of Supervisors chairman at large Chuck DeHaven wasn ’ t immediately returned Monday .
But he told the Herald-Mail of Hagerstown , Maryland , last week that Frederick County has no interest in becoming part of West Virginia .
A standing invite is one thing , but it appears that West Virginia is now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all Virginia counties .
The text of HCR 8 is below : Providing for an election to be had , pending approval of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia , and a majority of qualified citizens voting upon the proposition prior to August 1 , 2020 , for the admission of certain counties and independent cities of the Commonwealth of Virginia to be admitted to the State of West Virginia as constituent counties , under the provisions of Article VI , Section 11 of the Constitution of West Virginia Whereas , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in 1863 , due to longstanding perceived attitudes of neglect for the interests of the citizens of Western Virginia , and a studied failure to address the differences which had grown between the counties of Western Virginia and the government at Richmond , the Commonwealth of Virginia was irretrievably divided , and the new State of West Virginia was formed ; and Whereas , Such division occurred as the Trans-Allegheny portions of Virginia perceived that they suffered under an inequitable measure of taxation by which they bore a disproportionate share of the tax @ @ @ @ @ @ @ perception was further compounded by the effects of a scheme of representation by which Trans-Allegheny Virginia was not allowed to have its proper and equitable share of representation in the government at Richmond ; and Whereas , That this arrangement arguably resulted in the tax dollars of Trans-Allegheny Virginia being used to enrich the Tidewater through internal improvements which did not benefit the people of Western Virginia , while the people of the Trans-Allegheny had little to no say in how their tax dollars were allocated ; and Whereas , Though this course @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the subsequent formation of West Virginia , yet , the longstanding peaceful cooperation between this State and the Commonwealth of Virginia is a sign that such separation , undertaken even under the most challenging and onerous of circumstances , can , with the passage of time , yield lasting results which are beneficial to both sides ; and Whereas , In the intervening years , the same neglect for the interests of many of the remaining counties of the Commonwealth of Virginia has allegedly been evidenced by the government at Richmond ; and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Southside , the Shenandoah Valley , Southwestern Virginia , and the Piedmont contend that an inequitable measure of taxation exists by which they bear a disproportionate share of the present tax burden of the Commonwealth ; and Whereas , The people of the Southside , the Shenandoah Valley , Southwestern Virginia , and the Piedmont also believe that , currently , a scheme of representation exists by which the citizens of Southside , the Shenandoah Valley , Southwestern Virginia , and the Piedmont do not have a proper share of representation in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consequently Whereas , The people of the Southside , the Shenandoah Valley , Southwestern Virginia , and the Piedmont believe that their tax dollars are used to enrich the Tidewater and Northern Virginia through internal improvements which do not benefit the people of these other parts of Virginia , while the people of these other parts of Virginia have little to no say in how their tax dollars are allocated ; and Whereas , In recent days , these tensions have been compounded by a perception of contempt on the part of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ certain fundamental political and societal principles which prevail between the varied counties and cities of that Commonwealth ; and Whereas , In the latest , and most evident , in this string of grievances , the government at Richmond now seeks to place intolerable restraints upon the rights guaranteed under the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution to the citizens of that Commonwealth ; and Whereas , The Legislative body of West Virginia believes that this latest action defies the wise counsel which has come down to us in the august words @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of that tribune of liberty , Patrick Henry-who stated to the Virginia Ratifying Convention in 1788 that “ The great object is that every man be armed .
Everyone who is able might have a gun ” ; and Whereas , The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of a Signer of the Declaration and premier advocate of American independence , Richard Henry Lee-who stated in The Federal Farmer that “ To preserve liberty , it is essential that the whole body of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Whereas , The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of that zealous guardian of our inherent rights , George Mason-who stated that “ To disarm the people… [ i ] s the most effectual way to enslave them ” ; and Whereas , The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of the declaimer of our independence and theoretician of our freedoms , Thomas Jefferson-who stated in his first draft of the Virginia Constitution , that “ No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms ” ; and Whereas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Virginia counties and the Councils of many Virginia cities have recognized this dangerous departure from the doctrine of the Founders on the part of the government at Richmond ; and Whereas , These Boards of Supervisors and Councils have passed resolutions refusing to countenance what they affirm are unwarranted and unconstitutional measures by that government to infringe the firearm rights of Virginians ; and Whereas , The actions of the government at Richmond undertaken since the recent general election have , regrettably , resulted in unproductive contention and escalating a lamentable state of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , as has been proven in numerous instances , such as have been observed internationally in more recent times with the peaceful dissolutions of Czechoslovakia and the Soviet Union , and the creation of South Sudan , or , earlier in Virginia ’ s own history , with the formation of Kentucky , the peaceful partition of neighboring peoples can occur , and , is often very beneficial to both sides in reducing tensions and improving the tenor of discourse over ongoing political and societal differences ; and Whereas , Article VI , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ State of West Virginia explicitly permits additional territory to be admitted into , and become part of this state , with the consent of the Legislature and of a majority of the qualified voters of the state ; and Whereas , In a spirit of conciliation , the Legislature of West Virginia hereby extends an invitation to our fellow Virginians who wish to do so , to join us in our noble experiment of 156 years of separation from the government at Richmond ; and , we extend an invitation to any constituent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Virginia to be admitted to the body politic of the State of West Virginia , under the conditions set forth in our state Constitution , specifically , with the consent of a majority of the voters of such county or city voting upon such proposition ; and we hereby covenant that their many grievances shall be addressed , and , we further covenant with them that their firearms rights shall be protected to the fullest extent possible under our Federal and State Constitutions ; and Whereas , Providing that the General Assembly of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ assent to any county or independent city presently part of the Commonwealth of Virginia having the opportunity and ability to do so , therefore , be it Resolved by the Legislature of West Virginia : That the question of admission , or , the rejection of such admission , of any county or independent city of the Commonwealth of Virginia desiring admission to the State of West Virginia , and a majority of whose qualified voters , voting on the question , have approved such measure , prior to August 1 , 2020 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the State of West Virginia at the next general election to be held in the year 2020 .
Such proposal shall be placed upon the general election ballot in the following form : “ Shall the following county ( or independent city ) _____________________ ( name ) , currently a constituent part of the Commonwealth of Virginia , be admitted to the State of West Virginia as a constituent county of the State of West Virginia.
” Should the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia give its assent to any county @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Commonwealth of Virginia having the opportunity to do so , and such county or independent city desiring admission to the State of West Virginia , and a majority of whose qualified voters , voting on the question , not have approved such measure prior to August 1 , 2020 , but do approve such measure at a later date ; Then , this provision of this Act shall serve as an official request of the Legislature of West Virginia to the Governor of West Virginia to call a special session of this Legislature @ @ @ @ @ @ @ provide for the approval of the admission , or , the rejection of such admission , of such county or independent city ; and , be it Further Resolved , That the Legislature directs that the Clerk of the House forward copies of this resolution to the Board of Supervisors of each county in the Commonwealth of Virginia who have voted to become sanctuary counties for firearms rights , and to the Council of each independent city in the Commonwealth of Virginia who have voted to become sanctuary cities for firearms rights ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That the Legislature directs that the Clerk of the House forward copies of this resolution to the Clerk of the House of Delegates and Clerk of the Senate of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia and requests , in a spirit of peace and goodwill , that the General Assembly will allow this measure for the peaceful transfer of peoples and the restoration of harmony to the Virginias ; and , further requests , in a continuance of such spirit , that any firearms legislation proposed by that body have an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so that this exchange of peoples and territory could be accomplished before the effective date of such legislation .
Things are getting interesting with the 2A battle in Virginia .
• Virginia Gun Grabbers Now Looking to Eliminate Privately Owned Gun Ranges • Gun , ammo sales skyrocketing in Virginia as citizens arm up in anticipation of tyrannical gun confiscation efforts by insane , deranged Democrats • Virginia Gov .
Northam may soon need 10,000 body bags for his State Police and National Guard troops , since “ Biblical MAYHEM ” will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ counties trying to secede to join West Virginia would certainly be a messy process , drawn out by legal battles .
Let ’ s just hope for cooler heads to prevail and for Democrat led Virginia to listen to Virginians .
Isn ’ t that how it is supposed to work ?
Dean Garrison is Publisher at DC Clothesline and DC Dirty Laundry

The plot thickens with the 2A battle in Virginia.
West Virginia is now early in the process of inviting Virginia’s counties to secede and be annexed to West Virginia.
WSET reports that the first official invitation has been delivered to Frederick County, VA.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The West Virginia Senate adopted a resolution by voice vote Monday to remind residents of Frederick County, Virginia, that the county has a standing invite — from 1862 — to become part of West Virginia. It now goes to the House of Delegates.
The resolution was introduced by Morgan County Republican Charles Trump, whose district borders Frederick County. Trump was born in Winchester, the seat of Frederick, which is Virginia’s northernmost county.
A message left for Frederick County Board of Supervisors chairman at large Chuck DeHaven wasn’t immediately returned Monday. But he told the Herald-Mail of Hagerstown, Maryland, last week that Frederick County has no interest in becoming part of West Virginia.
More…
#####
A standing invite is one thing, but it appears that West Virginia is now preparing to offer the same invitation to all Virginia counties.
The text of HCR 8 is below:
HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 8
(By Delegates Howell, Summers, Shott, Householder, C. Martin, Hott, Graves, Cadle, Barnhart, J. Jeffries, Maynard, Phillips, Foster, Hamrick, Steele, D. Jeffries, Wilson, Waxman, Bartlett, Paynter and Linville)
[Introduced January 14, 2020]
Providing for an election to be had, pending approval of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and a majority of qualified citizens voting upon the proposition prior to August 1, 2020, for the admission of certain counties and independent cities of the Commonwealth of Virginia to be admitted to the State of West Virginia as constituent counties, under the provisions of Article VI, Section 11 of the Constitution of West Virginia
Whereas, The Legislature of West Virginia finds that in 1863, due to longstanding perceived attitudes of neglect for the interests of the citizens of Western Virginia, and a studied failure to address the differences which had grown between the counties of Western Virginia and the government at Richmond, the Commonwealth of Virginia was irretrievably divided, and the new State of West Virginia was formed; and
You Might Like
Whereas, Such division occurred as the Trans-Allegheny portions of Virginia perceived that they suffered under an inequitable measure of taxation by which they bore a disproportionate share of the tax burden; and
Whereas, That this perception was further compounded by the effects of a scheme of representation by which Trans-Allegheny Virginia was not allowed to have its proper and equitable share of representation in the government at Richmond; and
Whereas, That this arrangement arguably resulted in the tax dollars of Trans-Allegheny Virginia being used to enrich the Tidewater through internal improvements which did not benefit the people of Western Virginia, while the people of the Trans-Allegheny had little to no say in how their tax dollars were allocated; and
Whereas, Though this course led to an irreconcilable division, and the subsequent formation of West Virginia, yet, the longstanding peaceful cooperation between this State and the Commonwealth of Virginia is a sign that such separation, undertaken even under the most challenging and onerous of circumstances, can, with the passage of time, yield lasting results which are beneficial to both sides; and
Whereas, In the intervening years, the same neglect for the interests of many of the remaining counties of the Commonwealth of Virginia has allegedly been evidenced by the government at Richmond; and
Whereas, Particularly, many citizens of the Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont contend that an inequitable measure of taxation exists by which they bear a disproportionate share of the present tax burden of the Commonwealth; and
Whereas, The people of the Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont also believe that, currently, a scheme of representation exists by which the citizens of Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont do not have a proper share of representation in the government at Richmond; and, consequently
Whereas, The people of the Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont believe that their tax dollars are used to enrich the Tidewater and Northern Virginia through internal improvements which do not benefit the people of these other parts of Virginia, while the people of these other parts of Virginia have little to no say in how their tax dollars are allocated; and
Whereas, In recent days, these tensions have been compounded by a perception of contempt on the part of the government at Richmond for the differences in certain fundamental political and societal principles which prevail between the varied counties and cities of that Commonwealth; and
Whereas, In the latest, and most evident, in this string of grievances, the government at Richmond now seeks to place intolerable restraints upon the rights guaranteed under the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution to the citizens of that Commonwealth; and
Whereas, The Legislative body of West Virginia believes that this latest action defies the wise counsel which has come down to us in the august words of our common Virginia Founders: as the government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of that tribune of liberty, Patrick Henry-who stated to the Virginia Ratifying Convention in 1788 that “The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun”; and
Whereas, The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of a Signer of the Declaration and premier advocate of American independence, Richard Henry Lee-who stated in The Federal Farmer that “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms”; and
Whereas, The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of that zealous guardian of our inherent rights, George Mason-who stated that “To disarm the people…[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them”; and
Whereas, The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of the declaimer of our independence and theoretician of our freedoms, Thomas Jefferson-who stated in his first draft of the Virginia Constitution, that “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms”; and
Whereas, The Boards of Supervisors of many Virginia counties and the Councils of many Virginia cities have recognized this dangerous departure from the doctrine of the Founders on the part of the government at Richmond; and
Whereas, These Boards of Supervisors and Councils have passed resolutions refusing to countenance what they affirm are unwarranted and unconstitutional measures by that government to infringe the firearm rights of Virginians; and
Whereas, The actions of the government at Richmond undertaken since the recent general election have, regrettably, resulted in unproductive contention and escalating a lamentable state of civic tension; and
Whereas, That, as has been proven in numerous instances, such as have been observed internationally in more recent times with the peaceful dissolutions of Czechoslovakia and the Soviet Union, and the creation of South Sudan, or, earlier in Virginia’s own history, with the formation of Kentucky, the peaceful partition of neighboring peoples can occur, and, is often very beneficial to both sides in reducing tensions and improving the tenor of discourse over ongoing political and societal differences; and
Whereas, Article VI, Section 11 of The Constitution of the State of West Virginia explicitly permits additional territory to be admitted into, and become part of this state, with the consent of the Legislature and of a majority of the qualified voters of the state; and
Whereas, In a spirit of conciliation, the Legislature of West Virginia hereby extends an invitation to our fellow Virginians who wish to do so, to join us in our noble experiment of 156 years of separation from the government at Richmond; and, we extend an invitation to any constituent county or city of the Commonwealth of Virginia to be admitted to the body politic of the State of West Virginia, under the conditions set forth in our state Constitution, specifically, with the consent of a majority of the voters of such county or city voting upon such proposition; and we hereby covenant that their many grievances shall be addressed, and, we further covenant with them that their firearms rights shall be protected to the fullest extent possible under our Federal and State Constitutions; and
Whereas, Providing that the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia shall give its assent to any county or independent city presently part of the Commonwealth of Virginia having the opportunity and ability to do so, therefore, be it
Resolved by the Legislature of West Virginia:
That the question of admission, or, the rejection of such admission, of any county or independent city of the Commonwealth of Virginia desiring admission to the State of West Virginia, and a majority of whose qualified voters, voting on the question, have approved such measure, prior to August 1, 2020, shall be submitted to the voters of the State of West Virginia at the next general election to be held in the year 2020.
Such proposal shall be placed upon the general election ballot in the following form: “Shall the following county (or independent city) _____________________(name), currently a constituent part of the Commonwealth of Virginia, be admitted to the State of West Virginia as a constituent county of the State of West Virginia.”
Should the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia give its assent to any county or independent city presently part of the Commonwealth of Virginia having the opportunity to do so, and such county or independent city desiring admission to the State of West Virginia, and a majority of whose qualified voters, voting on the question, not have approved such measure prior to August 1, 2020, but do approve such measure at a later date;
Then, this provision of this Act shall serve as an official request of the Legislature of West Virginia to the Governor of West Virginia to call a special session of this Legislature to provide for a special election to provide for the approval of the admission, or, the rejection of such admission, of such county or independent city; and, be it
Further Resolved, That the Legislature directs that the Clerk of the House forward copies of this resolution to the Board of Supervisors of each county in the Commonwealth of Virginia who have voted to become sanctuary counties for firearms rights, and to the Council of each independent city in the Commonwealth of Virginia who have voted to become sanctuary cities for firearms rights; and, be it
Further Resolved, That the Legislature directs that the Clerk of the House forward copies of this resolution to the Clerk of the House of Delegates and Clerk of the Senate of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia and requests, in a spirit of peace and goodwill, that the General Assembly will allow this measure for the peaceful transfer of peoples and the restoration of harmony to the Virginias; and, further requests, in a continuance of such spirit, that any firearms legislation proposed by that body have an effective date far enough into the future so that this exchange of peoples and territory could be accomplished before the effective date of such legislation.
#####
Things are getting interesting with the 2A battle in Virginia.
Virginia counties trying to secede to join West Virginia would certainly be a messy process, drawn out by legal battles.
Let’s just hope for cooler heads to prevail and for Democrat led Virginia to listen to Virginians.
Isn’t that how it is supposed to work?
Dean Garrison is Publisher at DC Clothesline and DC Dirty Laundry


thedcclothesline--2020-01-15--Star of New Project Veritas/Bernie Sanders Video Has Extensive Criminal Record

Just in case you missed Tuesday ’ s bombshell Project Veritas ’ video , here it is .
After you watch it , or not , we will talk about the Bernie Sanders ’ Field Organizer in the video .
take our poll - story continues below The story behind the bombshell is who the guy in the video actually is .
We did a little research and found out that Kyle Jurek has a long police record that includes drug charges back in 2009 and again in 2016 .
Jurek was arrested in 2004 on operating a vehicle while @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we don ’ t have proof that he was arrested again this year .
He was arrested on January 7th , 2020 in Iowa , again .
Possession of Narcotics .
Arrested on the 8th , again .
This time , in Idaho on an outstanding warrant out of Iowa .
I believe they pick him up in Idaho on that outstanding warrant from September 2019 and the new drug arrest in Iowa on January 7th , 2020 .
He likely bonded out in Iowa then left the state without the judge ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all the documents in the article above from my searches of state law enforcement databases I have been able to access .
All publicly accessible databases .
I couldn ’ t get any additional info from the Idaho database but the Iowa database is public information .
He sounds like the perfect Bernie employee .
Would it surprise anyone if Bernie actually heeded Jurek ’ s advice and threw Trump voters in gulags ?
Let ’ s hope we don ’ t have to find out , but RED is definitely Bernie ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Robert Reich Don ’ t Just Want to Tax the Rich , They Want to Abolish Billionaires • “ Decarbonize ” means DEPOPULATION , because humans are carbon-based organisms… AOC , Bernie Sanders are actually promoting extermination of humans • Venezuelan Politician Dares Bernie Sanders to Come to His Country ‘ Without Bodyguards ’ • Bernie Sanders announces support for global eugenics and depopulation , calls on accelerating abortions in countries populated by people of color With Bernie Sanders in The White House we might be lucky if we got gulags instead of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to like Bernie .
What ’ s not to like ?
He hires felons and talks about depopulation .
If he gets the 2020 nomination , his slogan should be “ Depopulation Starts With YOU !
” Dean Garrison is Publisher of DC Clothesline and DC Dirty Laundry

Just in case you missed Tuesday’s bombshell Project Veritas’ video, here it is.
After you watch it, or not, we will talk about the Bernie Sanders’ Field Organizer in the video.
Spoiler Alert!
He’s has quite a history…
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Here’s the video…
The story behind the bombshell is who the guy in the video actually is.
We did a little research and found out that Kyle Jurek has a long police record that includes drug charges back in 2009 and again in 2016.
Jurek was arrested in 2004 on operating a vehicle while intoxicated.
I guess we can call Jurek a model Democrat.
There are some speculations that we don’t have proof that he was arrested again this year.
He was arrested on January 7th, 2020 in Iowa, again. Possession of Narcotics. Arrested on the 8th, again. This time, in Idaho on an outstanding warrant out of Iowa.
I believe they pick him up in Idaho on that outstanding warrant from September 2019 and the new drug arrest in Iowa on January 7th, 2020. He likely bonded out in Iowa then left the state without the judge’s approval. I provided you with all the documents in the article above from my searches of state law enforcement databases I have been able to access. All publicly accessible databases. I couldn’t get any additional info from the Idaho database but the Iowa database is public information.
Read it all…
#####
He sounds like the perfect Bernie employee.
You Might Like
Would it surprise anyone if Bernie actually heeded Jurek’s advice and threw Trump voters in gulags?
Let’s hope we don’t have to find out, but RED is definitely Bernie’s color.
With Bernie Sanders in The White House we might be lucky if we got gulags instead of guillotines.
A lot of people seem to like Bernie.
What’s not to like?
He hires felons and talks about depopulation.
If he gets the 2020 nomination, his slogan should be “Depopulation Starts With YOU!”
Dean Garrison is Publisher of DC Clothesline and DC Dirty Laundry