thedcclothesline--2020-10-21--“Plan for the worst”: Law enforcement authorities all over America are bracing for massive election

“Plan for the worst”: Law enforcement authorities all over America are bracing for massive election riots

ing , I think that the election of 2020 will tell us a lot about how far America has already fallen .
Thankfully , officials in most major cities do not have their heads stuck in the sand and have been preparing for massive riots following the election .
In New York , the NYPD is literally “ training every day ” to deal with the riots and protests that they are anticipating… In Los Angeles , officers are being told that “ they may need to reschedule ” their vacations so that they will be available for whatever may @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enforcement agencies are pointing to the riots that erupted in the aftermath of the death of George Floyd as the type of scenario that they want to be prepared for this time around .
Even down in Texas , authorities in multiple cities are admitting that “ they are planning for potential unrest around the Nov. 3 election ” … Of course in some cities the violent protests never seem to end .
Four years ago , chaos erupted in Portland when Donald Trump won the election , and the city has been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Over in Minneapolis , shell-shocked officials continue to deal with an unprecedented wave of crime and violence , and the spokesman for the police told the press that their approach for this upcoming election is to “ plan for the worst ” … I think that is a good word for all of us .
We can continue to hope that peace will prevail , but if you aren ’ t planning for the worst you are definitely making a big mistake .
At this point , even the Justice Department is “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The following comes from the Washington Post… Personally , I sincerely hope that authorities will be successful in minimizing unrest as much as possible .
Any sort of political violence should break all of our hearts , because that should never happen in this country .
Unfortunately , an increasing number of Americans are convinced that things in this nation will soon take a very chaotic turn .
In fact , one recent poll found that 61 percent of Americans believe that we are heading toward another civil war… Those numbers are truly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other surveys that I have seen .
Anger and hatred have been building up in our country for years , and it appears that we are about to reach a crescendo .
I will continue to speak out against rioting , looting and all forms of political violence , and many other influential voices are doing so as well .
But there are also so many voices throughout our society that are just stirring up more anger and more hatred with each passing day .
So I would encourage all of you to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the months ahead .
It looks like it is going to be a very pivotal time in our history , and the more bitterly the election results are contested the worse the chaos is likely to be .
And when a winner is finally declared , many on the losing side will inevitably feel like the election was stolen from them .
There is still time to avoid a worst case scenario , but right now it is difficult to imagine how all of this is going to end well .
***Michael ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Of The Future Of America ” is now available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon .
*** About the Author : My name is Michael Snyder and my brand new book entitled “ Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America ” is now available on Amazon.com .
In addition to my new book , I have written four others that are available on Amazon.com including The Beginning Of The End , Get Prepared Now , and Living A Life That Really Matters .
( # CommissionsEarned ) By purchasing the books @ @ @ @ @ @ @ my wife and I are doing , and by giving it to others you help to multiply the impact that we are having on people all over the globe .
I have published thousands of articles on The Economic Collapse Blog , End Of The American Dream and The Most Important News , and the articles that I publish on those sites are republished on dozens of other prominent websites all over the globe .
I always freely and happily allow others to republish my articles on their own websites , but I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ About the Author ” section with each article .
The material contained in this article is for general information purposes only , and readers should consult licensed professionals before making any legal , business , financial or health decisions .
I encourage you to follow me on social media on Facebook and Twitter , and any way that you can share these articles with others is a great help .
During these very challenging times , people will need hope more than ever before , and it is our goal to share the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people as we possibly can .

ing, I think that the election of 2020 will tell us a lot about how far America has already fallen.
Thankfully, officials in most major cities do not have their heads stuck in the sand and have been preparing for massive riots following the election. In New York, the NYPD is literally “training every day” to deal with the riots and protests that they are anticipating…
The NYPD is training every day and deploying hundreds of extra cops as it braces for Election Day and its aftermath, amid fears riots and protests could break out after the results are announced.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
In Los Angeles, officers are being told that “they may need to reschedule” their vacations so that they will be available for whatever may happen…
LAPD sent an internal memo to its officers last week that said they may need to reschedule any vacations around election day as the agency prepares for possible protests or other unrest, according to the Los Angeles Times.
In so many instances, law enforcement agencies are pointing to the riots that erupted in the aftermath of the death of George Floyd as the type of scenario that they want to be prepared for this time around.
Even down in Texas, authorities in multiple cities are admitting that “they are planning for potential unrest around the Nov. 3 election”…
Agencies in at least four major cities — Austin, El Paso, San Antonio and Fort Worth — confirmed they are planning for potential unrest around the Nov. 3 election. Officials in other Texas cities declined to say whether they’re doing the same. The intent of such preparations, said Tara Long, an Austin Police Department spokesperson, “is to ensure the safety of the community while protecting the rights of people to peacefully exercise their First Amendment rights.”
Of course in some cities the violent protests never seem to end.
Four years ago, chaos erupted in Portland when Donald Trump won the election, and the city has been wracked by civil unrest ever since then…
Portland Police say they are preparing for possible unrest on election night after they saw saw riots after the 2016 presidential election. It was just the beginning of what would be four years of unrest, protests and riots. Now, the 2020 election is just three weeks away and local police is preparing for the possibility of continued unrest.
Over in Minneapolis, shell-shocked officials continue to deal with an unprecedented wave of crime and violence, and the spokesman for the police told the press that their approach for this upcoming election is to “plan for the worst”…
In Minneapolis, where the protests after George Floyd’s murder raged for weeks, similar preparations are being made. “We are aware that this may be a flashpoint and have made appropriate plans,” Minneapolis police spokesman John Elder. “Remember: Plan for the worst and hope for the best.”
I think that is a good word for all of us.
We can continue to hope that peace will prevail, but if you aren’t planning for the worst you are definitely making a big mistake.
At this point, even the Justice Department is “bracing for possible civil unrest”. The following comes from the Washington Post…
Bracing for possible civil unrest on Election Day, the Justice Department is planning to station officials in a command center at FBI headquarters to coordinate the federal response to any disturbances or other problems with voting that may arise across the country, officials familiar with the matter said. Though the Justice Department monitors elections every year to ensure voters can cast their ballots, officials’ concerns are more acute this year that toxic politics, combined with the potential uncertainty surrounding vote tallies, could lead to violent demonstrations or clashes between opposing factions, those familiar with the matter said.
Personally, I sincerely hope that authorities will be successful in minimizing unrest as much as possible.
Any sort of political violence should break all of our hearts, because that should never happen in this country.
Unfortunately, an increasing number of Americans are convinced that things in this nation will soon take a very chaotic turn. In fact, one recent poll found that 61 percent of Americans believe that we are heading toward another civil war…
The poll, which included results from the “Back-to-Normal Barometer” survey, was conducted by three firms: Engagious, Sports and Leisure Research Group and ROKK Solutions. The poll results showed that over 61 percent of survey takers believe America is nearing a second civil war, with 41 percent who “strongly agree” with that assessment.
Those numbers are truly shocking, and they are consistent with other surveys that I have seen.
Anger and hatred have been building up in our country for years, and it appears that we are about to reach a crescendo.
You Might Like
I will continue to speak out against rioting, looting and all forms of political violence, and many other influential voices are doing so as well.
But there are also so many voices throughout our society that are just stirring up more anger and more hatred with each passing day.
So I would encourage all of you to “plan for the worst” for the months ahead. It looks like it is going to be a very pivotal time in our history, and the more bitterly the election results are contested the worse the chaos is likely to be.
And when a winner is finally declared, many on the losing side will inevitably feel like the election was stolen from them.
There is still time to avoid a worst case scenario, but right now it is difficult to imagine how all of this is going to end well.
***Michael’s new book entitled “Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America” is now available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.***
About the Author: My name is Michael Snyder and my brand new book entitled “Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America” is now available on Amazon.com. In addition to my new book, I have written four others that are available on Amazon.com including The Beginning Of The End, Get Prepared Now, and Living A Life That Really Matters. (#CommissionsEarned) By purchasing the books you help to support the work that my wife and I are doing, and by giving it to others you help to multiply the impact that we are having on people all over the globe. I have published thousands of articles on The Economic Collapse Blog, End Of The American Dream and The Most Important News, and the articles that I publish on those sites are republished on dozens of other prominent websites all over the globe. I always freely and happily allow others to republish my articles on their own websites, but I also ask that they include this “About the Author” section with each article. The material contained in this article is for general information purposes only, and readers should consult licensed professionals before making any legal, business, financial or health decisions. I encourage you to follow me on social media on Facebook and Twitter, and any way that you can share these articles with others is a great help. During these very challenging times, people will need hope more than ever before, and it is our goal to share the gospel of Jesus Christ with as many people as we possibly can.


thedcclothesline--2020-10-21--While Maintaining Allegiance to Black Lives Matter, Black Durham (North Carolina) Sheriff Admits Vio

While Maintaining Allegiance to Black Lives Matter, Black Durham (North Carolina) Sheriff Admits Violent Crime in His City Is Almost Always Black-on-Black

Previously on SBPDL : Shreveport Times Admits Record Gun Violence in City and Across America Is by Blacks ( Still Tries to Blame Whites for the Violence ) Again , the same pattern is emerging nationwide .
It doesn ’ t matter the city .
Only one variable matters .
Only one ( hint : blacks ) .
And the true culprit behind this pervasive problem from sea to shining sea is simply… white people and white racism as a “ public health crisis ” ultimately compelling black people to gun one another down .
[ ‘ We can not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ police chief , sheriff address rising crime rates , WRAL.com , October 18 , 2020 ] : Durham has been seeing a rise in gun violence since the start of the pandemic .
Shootings have increased by nearly 40 % in Durham this year compared to last year .
Those involved in crime are mostly young adults , according to officials .
take our poll - story continues below Law enforcement , faith leaders and political leaders held a news conference on Saturday afternoon addressing the rising crime rates .
“ Black lives @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said on Saturday .
“ Unfortunately , some have died at the hands of police .
But more have died at the hands of those who look like them.
” Durham has seen more than 700 shootings so far this year , according to the sheriff .
This year , there have been an “ unprecedented ” number of shootings in Durham , he said .
“ We need to start today curbing this violence , ” Birkhead said .
“ Addressing this pain and healing our community .
I know we can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ together.
” There ’ s a direct connection between a lack of education and crime , Birkhead said .
He also suggested that crime is connected to low socio-economic status .
Cerlelyn Davis , Durham police chief , spoke with passion on Saturday ’ s press conference about how large the problem of rising crime rates is .
“ The Durham Police Department can not handle a problem that is bigger than the Durham Police Department , ” she said .
Crime in Durham disproportionally affects people of color , Davis said , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ different speakers talked about the disconnect between Durham ’ s affluent community and Durham ’ s low-income community .
“ It ’ s going to take everybody to mobilize and be angry enough to save a life , ” Davis said .
She said that Durham police “ can not arrest the crime away , ” and the whole problem of crime involves social issues , Davis said .
Birkhead called on clergy members to “ stand with ” law enforcement .
He said , “ now is not the time to seek @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Durham.
” The sheriff also asked churches to take an “ active role ” in stopping violence on the streets .
He also suggested that clergy members run for office to better the community .
Durham County Commissioner Brenda Howerton addressed racism as a “ public health crisis , ” and asked the county to look at racist systems in place that prevent Black people from moving upward in society .
Howerton has been the only Black woman on the board for the past 12 years , she said .
“ Don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about you and your children , ” Howerton said .
Many speakers encouraged Durham to engage in the voting process , at the local , state and federal level .
The problem is so obvious , with even the black sheriff of Durham admitting who is committing the vast majority of crimes in the city ( individual blacks collectively responsible for the violent crime problem ) , but we must persist in believing Black Lives Matter nonetheless , though it is black people proving such a claim is warrantless and meaningless .
Somehow @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reason black people can ’ t stop shooting one another in Durham .
And Shreveport .
And Buffalo… And [ fill in the U.S. city here ] .

Previously on SBPDL: Shreveport Times Admits Record Gun Violence in City and Across America Is by Blacks (Still Tries to Blame Whites for the Violence)
Again, the same pattern is emerging nationwide. It doesn’t matter the city. Only one variable matters. Only one (hint: blacks).
And the true culprit behind this pervasive problem from sea to shining sea is simply… white people and white racism as a “public health crisis” ultimately compelling black people to gun one another down. [‘We cannot arrest the crime away;’ Durham police chief, sheriff address rising crime rates, WRAL.com, October 18, 2020]:
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Durham has been seeing a rise in gun violence since the start of the pandemic. Shootings have increased by nearly 40% in Durham this year compared to last year. Those involved in crime are mostly young adults, according to officials.
Law enforcement, faith leaders and political leaders held a news conference on Saturday afternoon addressing the rising crime rates.
“Black lives matter,” Durham Sheriff Clarence Birkhead said on Saturday. “Unfortunately, some have died at the hands of police. But more have died at the hands of those who look like them.”
Durham has seen more than 700 shootings so far this year, according to the sheriff.
This year, there have been an “unprecedented” number of shootings in Durham, he said.
“We need to start today curbing this violence,” Birkhead said. “Addressing this pain and healing our community. I know we can do it, we can do it together.”
There’s a direct connection between a lack of education and crime, Birkhead said. He also suggested that crime is connected to low socio-economic status.
Cerlelyn Davis, Durham police chief, spoke with passion on Saturday’s press conference about how large the problem of rising crime rates is.
“The Durham Police Department cannot handle a problem that is bigger than the Durham Police Department,” she said.
Crime in Durham disproportionally affects people of color, Davis said, in both victims and arrests.
Many different speakers talked about the disconnect between Durham’s affluent community and Durham’s low-income community.
“It’s going to take everybody to mobilize and be angry enough to save a life,” Davis said.
She said that Durham police “cannot arrest the crime away,” and the whole problem of crime involves social issues, Davis said.
You Might Like
Birkhead called on clergy members to “stand with” law enforcement. He said, “now is not the time to seek sanctuary in the churches, all across Durham.”
The sheriff also asked churches to take an “active role” in stopping violence on the streets. He also suggested that clergy members run for office to better the community.
Durham County Commissioner Brenda Howerton addressed racism as a “public health crisis,” and asked the county to look at racist systems in place that prevent Black people from moving upward in society.
Howerton has been the only Black woman on the board for the past 12 years, she said.
“Don’t sit back and think everybody cares about you and your children,” Howerton said.
Many speakers encouraged Durham to engage in the voting process, at the local, state and federal level.
The problem is so obvious, with even the black sheriff of Durham admitting who is committing the vast majority of crimes in the city (individual blacks collectively responsible for the violent crime problem), but we must persist in believing Black Lives Matter nonetheless, though it is black people proving such a claim is warrantless and meaningless.
Somehow, “racist systems” are the reason black people can’t stop shooting one another in Durham. And Shreveport. And Buffalo… And [fill in the U.S. city here].
Courtesy of UNZ.com


thedcclothesline--2020-10-21--YouTube confirms it will immediately ban all videos that question the “official” vaccine narrative p

YouTube confirms it will immediately ban all videos that question the “official” vaccine narrative promoted by the corrupt WHO and vaccine companies

( Natural News ) YouTube just confirmed they will work with the World Health Organization ( WHO ) to remove any videos that question the official vaccine narrative promoted by vaccine companies .
The Stalinist WHO has become nothing more than a Big Pharma front group , advancing the interests of vaccine makers .
The WHO has made Big Tech its echo chamber , selling Big Pharma ’ s immunosuppressants , which includes a long list of vaccines that damage cellular immunity .
There is no longer a shred of transparency surrounding vaccine science because the WHO is strategically eliminating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ uses Silicon Valley to censor truths about vaccination The WHO has partnered with Silicon Valley Big Tech giants to weed out any information about vaccine damage , vaccine injury , viral shedding from vaccines , among other serious topics that concern public health .
The WHO is targeting any hopeful information on treatments , preventative nutrition , plant-based medicines , and any information that could advance innate immunity and free human beings from endless vaccine experiments .
This authoritarian organization pays no regard to human rights as their team of vaccine pushers work @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine science , its shortcomings , and its sordid history of deadliness .
The scientific method is being suppressed and censored because the WHO demands vaccine obedience , targeting dissenters of vaccines as “ a public health threat.
” The WHO demands wide scale vaccine distribution while ignoring the science on its adverse effects .
This network of vaccine pushers coordinate to ensure that vaccine makers enjoy legal immunity when their products do harm , while censoring any debate about this atrocious reality .
Stalinist WHO coordinates with YouTube to suppress covid-19 vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ below The modern-day World Health Organization is like the USSR State Committee for Television and Radio Broadcasting , a propaganda and information suppression branch of Joseph Stalin ’ s early 20th century Soviet Union communist empire .
During that time , the Soviet Union controlled the television networks and radio stations with their own political propaganda , while locking down public speaking on important matters of human freedom , and punishing anyone who dared commit “ a slip of the tongue.
” Today , the WHO runs a digital solutions department that meets @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tech .
This dictatorial WHO department is led by Andy Pattison , who was open about their effort to censor any information that dampers human belief in upcoming coronavirus vaccines .
He told Reuters that his team meets with YouTube on a weekly basis to discuss content trends online while discussing the types of videos that spread “ dangerous misinformation ” about vaccines .
YouTube recently agreed to limit the spread of covid-19 related information that defies the position of the WHO .
YouTube is in the process of removing videos that question @ @ @ @ @ @ @ channels and any videos that point out the limitations of these vaccines and their potential to cause great harm .
YouTube is already working with the WHO to remove videos that dispute the “ supreme authority ” guidance provided by public health authorities .
Since February , YouTube has removed over 200,000 videos questioning the covid-19 status quo .
No one can post content that tells the truth about junky , non-specific coronavirus tests .
No one can post videos about the absurdities of contact tracing of healthy people and the constant shutting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ No one can question the worthlessness of social distancing and the mass mental illness of expecting people to follow arrows on the floor .
No one can dispute mandatory masking , or speak out about the negative psychological effects that these mass medical edicts have on everyone .
To make matters worse , no one can question vaccines at all , even though they are being rushed into existence , with numerous accounts of vaccine recipients suffering from adverse events , both mild and severe .
The WHO controls world democracy now , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ progress by infiltrating the internet with its Big Vaccine propaganda and censoring out the truth .
It ’ s a medical fascist takeover and the casualties will continue to mount , as important information is buried , smart people silenced .

(Natural News) YouTube just confirmed they will work with the World Health Organization (WHO) to remove any videos that question the official vaccine narrative promoted by vaccine companies.
The Stalinist WHO has become nothing more than a Big Pharma front group, advancing the interests of vaccine makers. The WHO has made Big Tech its echo chamber, selling Big Pharma’s immunosuppressants, which includes a long list of vaccines that damage cellular immunity. There is no longer a shred of transparency surrounding vaccine science because the WHO is strategically eliminating any dissent about vaccination online.
WHO uses Silicon Valley to censor truths about vaccination
The WHO has partnered with Silicon Valley Big Tech giants to weed out any information about vaccine damage, vaccine injury, viral shedding from vaccines, among other serious topics that concern public health. The WHO is targeting any hopeful information on treatments, preventative nutrition, plant-based medicines, and any information that could advance innate immunity and free human beings from endless vaccine experiments. This authoritarian organization pays no regard to human rights as their team of vaccine pushers work to bury information that is critical of vaccine science, its shortcomings, and its sordid history of deadliness.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The scientific method is being suppressed and censored because the WHO demands vaccine obedience, targeting dissenters of vaccines as “a public health threat.” The WHO demands wide scale vaccine distribution while ignoring the science on its adverse effects. This network of vaccine pushers coordinate to ensure that vaccine makers enjoy legal immunity when their products do harm, while censoring any debate about this atrocious reality.
Stalinist WHO coordinates with YouTube to suppress covid-19 vaccine concerns
The modern-day World Health Organization is like the USSR State Committee for Television and Radio Broadcasting, a propaganda and information suppression branch of Joseph Stalin’s early 20th century Soviet Union communist empire. During that time, the Soviet Union controlled the television networks and radio stations with their own political propaganda, while locking down public speaking on important matters of human freedom, and punishing anyone who dared commit “a slip of the tongue.”
Today, the WHO runs a digital solutions department that meets weekly with the policy teams of Big Tech. This dictatorial WHO department is led by Andy Pattison, who was open about their effort to censor any information that dampers human belief in upcoming coronavirus vaccines. He told Reuters that his team meets with YouTube on a weekly basis to discuss content trends online while discussing the types of videos that spread “dangerous misinformation” about vaccines. YouTube recently agreed to limit the spread of covid-19 related information that defies the position of the WHO. YouTube is in the process of removing videos that question covid-19 vaccines. YouTube is currently banning channels and any videos that point out the limitations of these vaccines and their potential to cause great harm.
YouTube is already working with the WHO to remove videos that dispute the “supreme authority” guidance provided by public health authorities. Since February, YouTube has removed over 200,000 videos questioning the covid-19 status quo. No one can post content that tells the truth about junky, non-specific coronavirus tests. No one can post videos about the absurdities of contact tracing of healthy people and the constant shutting down of society over virus fears. No one can question the worthlessness of social distancing and the mass mental illness of expecting people to follow arrows on the floor. No one can dispute mandatory masking, or speak out about the negative psychological effects that these mass medical edicts have on everyone. To make matters worse, no one can question vaccines at all, even though they are being rushed into existence, with numerous accounts of vaccine recipients suffering from adverse events, both mild and severe.
The WHO controls world democracy now, punishing thought, mocking scientific integrity and progress by infiltrating the internet with its Big Vaccine propaganda and censoring out the truth. It’s a medical fascist takeover and the casualties will continue to mount, as important information is buried, smart people silenced.
Sources include:
Reuters.com
NaturalNews.com
NaturalNews.com
Journals.SagePub.com
Vaccines.News


thedcclothesline--2020-10-21--FAUCI WANTS EVERYONE TO “SACRIFICE” BY REFUSING TO CELEBRATE THANKSGIVING

Authoritarian Dr. Anthony Fauci wants us to “ sacrifice ” and give up our traditions and time with family .
He is urging Americans to give up Thanksgiving this year .
Tyrant Bill de Blasio , the mayor of New York City has already canceled the iconic and historic Macy ’ s Thanksgiving day parade in .
We are supposed to be giving up this time generally spend socializing with family and being grateful for everything so they can keep the fear going over this coronavirus scamdemic .
“ Thanksgiving is going to look very different this year , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right , but only because people are still bowing to the commands of politicians and going along with tyranny .
Fauci said Dr. Deborah Birx has done a good job enslaving the masses too using fear .
“ She ’ s done an amazing job of traveling to different states trying to get a feel for what ’ s going on , ” he told CBS News anchor Norah O ’ Donnell .
Fauci said Birx told him : ” Household transmission now is assuming a greater element of the transmissibility .
Don @ @ @ @ @ @ @ re in your own home with your own family that you ’ re not going to spread infection.
” take our poll - story continues below Did anyone catch that ?
Weren ’ t we supposed to be locked in our homes back in March to prevent the spread of this virus ?
Now they don ’ t even want us around our own family ?
This is getting so ridiculous , and it ’ s absolutely astonishing that a good number of humans haven ’ t figured out that this was all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ People should be very careful and prudent about social gatherings , ” Fauci said .
“ You may have to bite the bullet , and sacrifice social gatherings unless you ’ re pretty certain that the people you ’ re dealing with are not infected or have very recently tested , or they ’ re living a lifestyle in which they don ’ t have any interaction with anybody except you and your family.
” Fauci and everyone else telling people how they will act and behave can piss off .
If you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ too , you will make a good slave for the New World Order .
To say “ wake up ” has become cliche .
If you haven ’ t figured it out yet , you are probably doomed to a live of servitude in the New World Order where you do one thing for the rest of your life : comply .
This isn ’ t about health .
This about manufacturing compliance with tyranny .

Authoritarian Dr. Anthony Fauci wants us to “sacrifice” and give up our traditions and time with family. He is urging Americans to give up Thanksgiving this year.
Tyrant Bill de Blasio, the mayor of New York City has already canceled the iconic and historic Macy’s Thanksgiving day parade in. We are supposed to be giving up this time generally spend socializing with family and being grateful for everything so they can keep the fear going over this coronavirus scamdemic.
“Thanksgiving is going to look very different this year,” said Fauci. And he’s right, but only because people are still bowing to the commands of politicians and going along with tyranny.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Fauci said Dr. Deborah Birx has done a good job enslaving the masses too using fear. “She’s done an amazing job of traveling to different states trying to get a feel for what’s going on,” he told CBS News anchor Norah O’Donnell. Fauci said Birx told him: ”Household transmission now is assuming a greater element of the transmissibility. Don’t assume that because you’re in your own home with your own family that you’re not going to spread infection.”
Did anyone catch that? Weren’t we supposed to be locked in our homes back in March to prevent the spread of this virus? Now they don’t even want us around our own family? This is getting so ridiculous, and it’s absolutely astonishing that a good number of humans haven’t figured out that this was all a lie from the beginning.
“People should be very careful and prudent about social gatherings,” Fauci said. “You may have to bite the bullet, and sacrifice social gatherings unless you’re pretty certain that the people you’re dealing with are not infected or have very recently tested, or they’re living a lifestyle in which they don’t have any interaction with anybody except you and your family.” Fauci and everyone else telling people how they will act and behave can piss off. If you aren’t sick of being dictated too, you will make a good slave for the New World Order.
To say “wake up” has become cliche. If you haven’t figured it out yet, you are probably doomed to a live of servitude in the New World Order where you do one thing for the rest of your life: comply. This isn’t about health. This about manufacturing compliance with tyranny.
Courtesy of SHTFplan.com


thedcclothesline--2020-10-21--COVID-19 CASES SURGE AS “SECOND WAVE GATHERS PACE”, PREPARE FOR ANOTHER LOCKDOWN

We knew that the governments would eventually do everything they could to propagate a second lockdown .
With cases “ surging ” and on the rise virtually everywhere , the ruling class is discussing another lockdown .
The number of reported coronavirus cases around the world has hit 40 million , according to a tally kept by Johns Hopkins University .
But considering that those numbers are repeatedly rammed down the throats of the public with attempts to terrify and panic them into accepting their own oppression , it isn ’ t a surprise .
Right now , the governments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the public and suggesting another lockdown would thrash their already destroyed economies .
And they would be correct , however , a lesson we should have all learned by now is that we can not trust politicians .
This plandemic has made that abundantly clear .
take our poll - story continues below The best thing to do is live your life as there won ’ t be any more tyranny , but to be prepared for attempts at ultimate enslavement .
Governments are known to never let a good crisis ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ waste .
This is not meant to scare you , but to prompt you to prepare for anything .
Fear is useless , choose to observe events , and prepare to come out on top .
Please consider helping out family members and stock up on things such and medications and medical supplies .
Get hard copies of books now if you can .
Thrift stores are great , or order from Amazon .
Check delivery dates though , as some may not show up before the election , and I suggest you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ day before the election .
Have things you can barter with on hand .
This could be anything you choose that others may want , such as toilet paper , hard liquor and spirits , extra first aid equipment , precious metals , seeds , or batteries .
Use your imagination , almost anything can be bartered .
Prepping : 5 Inexpensive Barterable Items To Stock Up On NOW For those who do not think a second lockdown is coming , if you prepare for one , you ’ ll be ready no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and anticipate the best .
Keep your mental state calm , cool , collected , and see things as they are .
Do not stoop to fear like the controllers want .
Step out of the left-right paradim and be ready for anything .
That ’ s the best advice I have right now to come out of this .

We knew that the governments would eventually do everything they could to propagate a second lockdown. With cases “surging” and on the rise virtually everywhere, the ruling class is discussing another lockdown.
The number of reported coronavirus cases around the world has hit 40 million, according to a tally kept by Johns Hopkins University. But considering that those numbers are repeatedly rammed down the throats of the public with attempts to terrify and panic them into accepting their own oppression, it isn’t a surprise.
European governments have scrambled to contain a surge in cases by re-introducing a raft of restrictive measures on public life and the hospitality sector, including the closure or limited opening of pubs, bars, and restaurants, restricting social gatherings, and even resorting to curfews, now seen in a handful of major French cities, including Paris. –CNBC
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Right now, the governments are pretending to be on the side of the public and suggesting another lockdown would thrash their already destroyed economies. And they would be correct, however, a lesson we should have all learned by now is that we can not trust politicians. This plandemic has made that abundantly clear.
“Darkest Winter?” DHS “Prepares” For EMP Attack
The COVID-19 “Dark Winter” PsyOp: Question Everything…
The best thing to do is live your life as there won’t be any more tyranny, but to be prepared for attempts at ultimate enslavement. Governments are known to never let a good crisis (even one they created) go to waste. This is not meant to scare you, but to prompt you to prepare for anything. Fear is useless, choose to observe events, and prepare to come out on top.
Please consider helping out family members and stock up on things such and medications and medical supplies. Get hard copies of books now if you can. Thrift stores are great, or order from Amazon. Check delivery dates though, as some may not show up before the election, and I suggest you be where you want to be the day before the election. Have things you can barter with on hand. This could be anything you choose that others may want, such as toilet paper, hard liquor and spirits, extra first aid equipment, precious metals, seeds, or batteries. Use your imagination, almost anything can be bartered.
Prepping: 5 Inexpensive Barterable Items To Stock Up On NOW
For those who do not think a second lockdown is coming, if you prepare for one, you’ll be ready no matter what. Prepare for the worst and anticipate the best. Keep your mental state calm, cool, collected, and see things as they are. Do not stoop to fear like the controllers want. Step out of the left-right paradim and be ready for anything. That’s the best advice I have right now to come out of this.
Courtesy of SHTFplan.com


thedcclothesline--2020-10-22--Just Make It Illegal to Call 9-1-1 on a Black Person: San Francisco to Vote on Stopping Citizens fro

Just Make It Illegal to Call 9-1-1 on a Black Person: San Francisco to Vote on Stopping Citizens from Calling Police on Blacks

Previously on SBPDL : Just Make It Illegal to Call 9-1-1 on a Black Person : Michigan Governor Proposes Making Racially Motivated 911 Calls a ‘ Hate Crime ’ Seriously , just make it illegal to call 911 on black people .
It ’ s where we headed as a society .
Call it the Emmitt Till Act .
[ San Francisco officials to vote on ‘ CAREN ’ law to stop 911 calls against Black people not committing crime : The city ’ s Board of Supervisors will vote on the Caution Against Racial and Exploitative Non-Emergencies Act , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ] : Fed up with white people calling 911 about people of color selling water bottles , barbecuing or otherwise going about with life , San Francisco supervisors are set to approve new hate crime legislation giving the targets of those calls the ability to sue the caller .
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors will vote Tuesday on the Caution Against Racial and Exploitative Non-Emergencies Act , also known as the CAREN legislation .
The name is a nod to a widespread meme using the name “ Karen ” to describe a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , who exhibits behaviors that stem from privilege , such as using the police to target people of color .
take our poll - story continues below All 11 supervisors have signed on to the legislation , guaranteeing its passage , despite criticism by some that the name is sexist and unnecessarily divisive .
In San Francisco , a white couple was criticized on social media after video was widely shared of their questioning a Filipino American stenciling “ Black Lives Matter ” in front of his own home in June .
They @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he deliberately chose yellow chalk to match the color of the house , and centered the stencil just so to be framed by the picture box window .
Then a couple approached him , repeatedly demanding to know if this was his home because he was defacing private property .
“ They tried to cast it as a criminal scene , ” he said .
“ It was me calmly applying chalk , not spray paint , not in the middle of the night but very deliberately .
The only thing that was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said he hopes the legislation will caution people in the future against turning to 911 .
Shamann Walton , the supervisor who introduced the legislation said , “ 911 calls and emergency reports are not customer service lines for racist behavior .
“ People of color have the right to do everyday activities and should not be subject to being harassed due to someone ’ s racial bias.
” Walton , who is Black , reeled off examples where minorities have suffered from bogus claims , including Emmitt Till , a Black teenager @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by a white woman who later admitted to lying .
It is crushing to be confronted by police , say supporters of the legislation , because someone saw you as a threat , possibly criminal or as not belonging .
It ’ s especially terrifying for Black people for whom encounters with police could end in violence .
“ This is not hyperbole , ” said Brittni Chicuata , chief of staff at the city ’ s Human Rights Commission .
“ This is an established pattern reflected in the disparate treatment of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in our city and in our country.
” In May , Amy Cooper , a white woman , called 911 from Manhattan ’ s Central Park , frantically and falsely claiming that an African American man — who had politely asked her to leash her dog — was threatening her .
Just make it illegal to call 9-1-1 on a black criminal .
That ’ s the only way for white people to actually check their privilege once and for all .

Previously on SBPDL: Just Make It Illegal to Call 9-1-1 on a Black Person: Michigan Governor Proposes Making Racially Motivated 911 Calls a ‘Hate Crime’
Seriously, just make it illegal to call 911 on black people. It’s where we headed as a society. Call it the Emmitt Till Act. [San Francisco officials to vote on ‘CAREN’ law to stop 911 calls against Black people not committing crime: The city’s Board of Supervisors will vote on the Caution Against Racial and Exploitative Non-Emergencies Act, Fox News, October 20, 2020]:
Fed up with white people calling 911 about people of color selling water bottles, barbecuing or otherwise going about with life, San Francisco supervisors are set to approve new hate crime legislation giving the targets of those calls the ability to sue the caller.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors will vote Tuesday on the Caution Against Racial and Exploitative Non-Emergencies Act, also known as the CAREN legislation. The name is a nod to a widespread meme using the name “Karen” to describe a specific type of white, middle-aged woman, who exhibits behaviors that stem from privilege, such as using the police to target people of color.
All 11 supervisors have signed on to the legislation, guaranteeing its passage, despite criticism by some that the name is sexist and unnecessarily divisive.
In San Francisco, a white couple was criticized on social media after video was widely shared of their questioning a Filipino American stenciling “Black Lives Matter” in front of his own home in June. They later called police.
James Juanillo said he deliberately chose yellow chalk to match the color of the house, and centered the stencil just so to be framed by the picture box window. Then a couple approached him, repeatedly demanding to know if this was his home because he was defacing private property.
“They tried to cast it as a criminal scene,” he said. “It was me calmly applying chalk, not spray paint, not in the middle of the night but very deliberately. The only thing that was missing was a pinot grigio.”
Juanillo said he hopes the legislation will caution people in the future against turning to 911.
Shamann Walton, the supervisor who introduced the legislation said, “911 calls and emergency reports are not customer service lines for racist behavior.
“People of color have the right to do everyday activities and should not be subject to being harassed due to someone’s racial bias.”
Walton, who is Black, reeled off examples where minorities have suffered from bogus claims, including Emmitt Till, a Black teenager beaten to death in 1955 after accusations by a white woman who later admitted to lying.
It is crushing to be confronted by police, say supporters of the legislation, because someone saw you as a threat, possibly criminal or as not belonging. It’s especially terrifying for Black people for whom encounters with police could end in violence.
“This is not hyperbole,” said Brittni Chicuata, chief of staff at the city’s Human Rights Commission. “This is an established pattern reflected in the disparate treatment of Black people and other people of color in our city and in our country.”
In May, Amy Cooper, a white woman, called 911 from Manhattan’s Central Park, frantically and falsely claiming that an African American man — who had politely asked her to leash her dog — was threatening her.
The entire Black Lives Matter movement exists to basically legalize black criminality.
You Might Like
Just make it illegal to call 9-1-1 on a black criminal. That’s the only way for white people to actually check their privilege once and for all.
Courtesy of UNZ.com


thedcclothesline--2020-10-22--Democrats panicky as early voting data indicate mail-in balloting not matching narrative of massive

Democrats panicky as early voting data indicate mail-in balloting not matching narrative of massive blue wave

( Natural News ) Another election cycle , another set of left-wing narratives are being shattered .
In 2016 , Americans were told that Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton was going to wipe the floor with then-GOP nominee Donald Trump .
All of the polling showed that .
In fact , all of the polling for months had shown that .
It wasn ’ t even going to be close .
Trump should have just conceded ahead of time , the brainiacs in the ‘ mainstream media ’ told us .
Well , we all know how that turned out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ below Then came the fake ‘ Russian collusion ’ narrative .
And the Ukraine hoax .
And now , here we are again , back to the future .
Throughout this current election cycle , Americans have been told for months that mind-addled former Vice President Joe Biden is going to wipe the floor with President Trump .
He leads by double digits in the polls .
All the battleground states that Trump wasn ’ t supposed to win in 2016 are now going to go back to the ‘ blue ’ column @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Biden getting the required 270 electoral votes necessary to win , but how big his final electoral vote tally will be .
Oh , and we know it ’ s going to be huge because , we ’ re told , Democrat voters by the legions are going to take advantage of early mail-in balloting to avoid exposure to COVID-19 ( while they continue to go to Walmart , the local grocery store , and as many massed riots and other ‘ non-violent ’ demonstrations as they can attend ) .
For @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been this : Democrats will jump out to huge , early mail-in ballot leads and there won ’ t be any way Trump will be able to catch up with in-person balloting on Election Day .
Except that narrative is proving to be a lie as well .
Up until this weekend , the Democratic victory narrative has been this : Dems will outperform in early and mail in voting .
Republicans , leerier to mail-in voting , will opt for in person voting and will outperform on election day .
However , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will not be enough to overcome the massive early voting numbers by the Democrats .
For one , because of COVID lockdowns on most college campuses , the student vote is suppressed , analysts have discovered .
For another , early voting in Texas is heavily Republican , destroying the notion of a blue Lone Star State .
For another , a general malaise and complacency exists among Democrats because they were told repeatedly their candidates have it in the bag .
Key counties in Michigan have shifted red .
Most notably , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ half a million votes cast in Oakland county in 2016 , overwhelming for Hillary Clinton , it ’ s nothing less than complete shock to see early voting highly favorable to Republicans .
With 25 % of the Michigan vote in , these results are absolutely terrifying to Democrats .
“ Even if we model the data using the most optimistic expectations for Democrats on Nov. 3rd , Republicans still outnumber in the end .
This data runs counter to their narrative for victory .
The data also suggests the polls are off–way @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the total data is a significant data set that can not be dismissed easily .
It ’ s a data set much larger than any Michigan poll , ” the outlet noted .
Fox News host Jesse Watters , in a segment for “ The Five ” on Monday , noted that the vote-by-mail is trending badly for Democrats , meaning Trump is heading for a landslide victory .
“ If you look at the early vote-by-mail , this is a Trump landslide in the making , ” he said , adding that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mail-in ballots in order to counter the president ’ s mostly Republican Election Day in-person voting tally .

(Natural News) Another election cycle, another set of left-wing narratives are being shattered.
In 2016, Americans were told that Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton was going to wipe the floor with then-GOP nominee Donald Trump.
All of the polling showed that. In fact, all of the polling for months had shown that. It wasn’t even going to be close. Trump should have just conceded ahead of time, the brainiacs in the ‘mainstream media’ told us.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Well, we all know how that turned out.
Then came the fake ‘Russian collusion’ narrative. And the Ukraine hoax.
And now, here we are again, back to the future.
Throughout this current election cycle, Americans have been told for months that mind-addled former Vice President Joe Biden is going to wipe the floor with President Trump. He leads by double digits in the polls. All the battleground states that Trump wasn’t supposed to win in 2016 are now going to go back to the ‘blue’ column. It’s not a matter of Biden getting the required 270 electoral votes necessary to win, but how big his final electoral vote tally will be.
Oh, and we know it’s going to be huge because, we’re told, Democrat voters by the legions are going to take advantage of early mail-in balloting to avoid exposure to COVID-19 (while they continue to go to Walmart, the local grocery store, and as many massed riots and other ‘non-violent’ demonstrations as they can attend).
For weeks the narrative from the left has been this: Democrats will jump out to huge, early mail-in ballot leads and there won’t be any way Trump will be able to catch up with in-person balloting on Election Day.
Except that narrative is proving to be a lie as well.
TopTradeGuru notes:
Up until this weekend, the Democratic victory narrative has been this: Dems will outperform in early and mail in voting. Republicans, leerier to mail-in voting, will opt for in person voting and will outperform on election day. However, in the end, the in-person voting will not be enough to overcome the massive early voting numbers by the Democrats.
For one, because of COVID lockdowns on most college campuses, the student vote is suppressed, analysts have discovered. For another, early voting in Texas is heavily Republican, destroying the notion of a blue Lone Star State. For another, a general malaise and complacency exists among Democrats because they were told repeatedly their candidates have it in the bag.
Here’s a sampling, via TopTradeGuru:
Key counties in Michigan have shifted red. Most notably, Kent and Oakland counties. With a half a million votes cast in Oakland county in 2016, overwhelming for Hillary Clinton, it’s nothing less than complete shock to see early voting highly favorable to Republicans. With 25% of the Michigan vote in, these results are absolutely terrifying to Democrats.
“Even if we model the data using the most optimistic expectations for Democrats on Nov. 3rd, Republicans still outnumber in the end. This data runs counter to their narrative for victory. The data also suggests the polls are off–way off. Furthermore, 25% of the total data is a significant data set that cannot be dismissed easily. It’s a data set much larger than any Michigan poll,” the outlet noted.
You Might Like
There’s more.
Fox News host Jesse Watters, in a segment for “The Five” on Monday, noted that the vote-by-mail is trending badly for Democrats, meaning Trump is heading for a landslide victory.
"If you look at the early vote-by-mail, this is @realdonaldtrump landslide in the making" #TheFive pic.twitter.com/7e2rtlWJhf — Jesse Watters (@JesseBWatters) October 19, 2020
“If you look at the early vote-by-mail, this is a Trump landslide in the making,” he said, adding that Democrats will need a 2.5-times lead in mail-in ballots in order to counter the president’s mostly Republican Election Day in-person voting tally.
Sources include:
TopTradeGuru.com
NaturalNews.com


thedcclothesline--2020-10-22--There Is A Solution To Big Tech Censorship – But No Politician Will Touch It

The issue of censorship by major tech companies is a precarious one , and I ’ m becoming increasingly suspicious of the nature of the debate .
There are some complexities , but it can all be boiled down to this : Big tech social media conglomerates argue that their websites are like any other private business and that they are protected from overt government interference by the US constitution .
In other words , they have a right to platform or deplatform anyone they choose .
Of course , this is the exact OPPOSITE of what most leftist groups @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comes to private businesses refusing to cooperate with people they disagree with on basic principle , such as LGBT activists , but let ’ s set that hypocrisy aside for now .
Social media companies have decided that the people they want to deplatform most are conservatives , along anyone else who disagrees with hard left ideologies such as social justice or the handling of the pandemic situation .
Statements or content that run contrary to leftist philosophies are simply labeled “ hate speech ” or “ conspiracy theory ” and are erased @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a monopoly with far too much power , that social media should be treated more like a public resource or “ town square ” and that these companies are violating the free speech rights of conservatives by specifically targeting them for censorship .
Many conservatives are also demanding that Donald Trump and the government step in to regulate or punish such companies for these actions .
take our poll - story continues below The truth is that both sides are right , and both sides are wrong .
The real solution to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we view the institution of corporations and how they interact with government , and it ’ s a solution I doubt ANY political official will consider , and that includes Trump .
Social media and big tech do in fact represent a monopoly , but not in terms most people are familiar with .
Instead of acting only as an economic monopoly controlling market share , big tech is also a political monopoly controlling the majority of communication platforms .
If only one political and social ideological group dominates every major social media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ my view represents a completely unbalanced power dynamic that does indeed threaten the free speech rights of the populace .
Rabid censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal , a scandal that is supported by facts and evidence that big tech has chosen to bury because it ’ s inconvenient to them rather than a violation of their community guidelines , is just one more example of the incredible danger that social media monopolies present .
Obviously , there is the issue of private property rights to consider .
I fully support and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ believe that a business has the freedom to refuse service to anyone for any reason .
Just because you open your doors to the public does not mean the public now owns your labor .
You should have the right to refuse labor whenever you wish .
If a business refuses a customer based merely on personal bias , then word is going to get around quickly and that business may lose a large number of potential buyers in the future ( this is happening right now with multiple alternative social media companies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ market should determine the fate of that business , not state or federal governments .
Government itself is an untrustworthy entity that craves a monopoly of power , and by handing government the authority to micromanage the policies and internal practices of web companies we might be trading the big tech monster for an even more dangerous governmental monster .
Who is to say that the government will stop with sites like Facebook or Twitter or Google ?
Maybe they will exploit their newfound powers to go after smaller websites as well .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ entire internet .
Maybe they will start dominating and restricting conservative websites instead of the leftist conglomerates we intended , and then we will be doubly screwed .
If you value freedom and the Bill of Rights , then this debate leaves us at an impasse .
Both sides ( perhaps conveniently ) lead to a totalitarian outcome .
The thing is , the publicly presented argument is a contrived one , a manipulated discussion that only presents two sides when there are more options to consider .
The narrative is fixed , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has been led to believe that government and corporations are separate tools that can be used to keep each side in check .
This is a lie .
Big government and big corporations have always worked together while pretending to be disconnected , and this needs to stop if we are to ever defuse the political time bomb we now face .
To solve the social media censorship debacle we need to examine the very roots of corporations as entities .
First , corporations as we know them today are a relatively new @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a corporation as a “ joint stock company ” in his treatise ‘ The Wealth Of Nations ’ , and stood against them as a threat to free market economics .
He specifically outlined their history of monopoly and failure , and criticized their habit of avoiding responsibility for mistakes and crimes .
Joint stock companies were chartered by governments and given special protections from risk , as well as protection from civil litigation ( lawsuits ) .
But , they were supposed to be temporary business entities , not perpetual business @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the creation of a joint stock company to finish a particular job , such as building a railroad , and once the job was finished the company was dissolved and the government protections were no longer needed .
Smith knew that if corporations were ever allowed to become permanent fixtures in an economy , they would result in disaster .
This is exactly what happened in 1886 when the Supreme Court allowed companies like Southern Pacific Railroad to use the 14th Amendment , which was supposed to protect the constitutional rights of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to declare corporations as “ legal persons ” with all the protections of an individual citizen .
Not only that , but with limited liability , corporations actually became super-citizens with protections far beyond normal individuals .
Corporations became the preeminent force in the world and it was their relationship with governments that made this possible .
This fact completely debunks today ’ s notion of what constitutes free markets .
Corporations ARE NOT free market structures .
They are , in fact , government chartered and government protected monopolies .
They are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and therefore they should not exist in a free market society at all .
The alternative option to corporations was for businesses to form “ partnerships ” , which did not enjoy protection from government , limited liability or the ability to form monopolies .
When the owners of a partnership committed a crime , they could be personally held liable for that crime .
When a corporation commits a crime , only the company as a vaporous faceless entity can be punished .
This is why it is very rare to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how egregious and catastrophic their actions .
Today , certain corporations continue to enjoy government protections while also enjoying government welfare .
Meaning , these companies get a legal shield while also basking in the advantage of tax incentives and taxpayer dollars .
For example , Google ( Alphabet and YouTube ) has long received huge tax breaks and is rarely if ever forced to pay in full for the massive bandwidth the company uses .
In fact , YouTube was facing bandwidth affordability issues until it was purchased by Alphabet and Google @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worry about it – Google gets over 21 times more bandwidth than it actually pays for because of government intervention .
The same rules apply to companies like Twitter , Facebook , Netflix , Apple , etc .
All of them enjoy extensive tax breaks as well as cheap bandwidth that makes it impossible for small and medium sized businesses to compete , even if they operate on a superior model or have superior ideas .
Many times the corporations pay no taxes whatsoever while smaller businesses are crippled by overt payments .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ a rule , but the current system deliberately crushes competition .
Again , we live in a socialist framework , not a free market framework .
Now that we understand the nature of big tech and what these companies actually are ( creations of government ) , the debate on social media censorship changes .
How ?
Take for example the fact that public universities in the US are not legally allowed to interfere with free speech rights because many of them survive by consuming taxpayer dollars .
They are PUBLIC institutions , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ treating major corporations that survive on endless taxpayer infusions and incentives as if they are private businesses ?
They are not – They are publicly funded structures chartered by the government and therefore they should be subject to the same rules on free speech that universities are required to follow .
Said corporations will surely argue against this and will attempt to use legal chicanery to maintain their monopolies .
Trying to dismantle them could take decades , and there are no guarantees that government officials will even make the attempt ?
Why @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and corporations has been an advantageous one for establishment elites for decades .
Instead of challenging the corporate model in the Supreme Court , an easier option would be to simply take away all welfare and tax incentives for any big tech companies that refuse to allow free speech on their platforms .
If Google had to pay normal price for the bandwidth it uses , the corporation would either implode or it would be forced to break apart into multiple smaller companies that would then compete with each other .
More competition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ better products .
The threat of losing tax incentives would mean more large companies would refrain from censorship .
Donald Trump as president could conceivably make this happen , but he will not , and neither will any other political official .
The partnership between government and corporations will continue , I believe , because there are other agendas at play here .
The establishment WANTS the public to argue in favor of tech totalitarianism on one side and in favor of government totalitarianism on the other side .
They aren ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enter the discussion .
The only available strategy left for fighting back against big tech is to continue leaving their platforms and building our own .
This will take many years to accomplish .
The point is , there is a more permanent option , but it requires a complete deconstruction of the socialist government/corporate framework now in place .
To confront the power dynamic between governments and major conglomerates is to confront one of the fundamental sources of corruption within our society , which is why it won ’ t be allowed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ police itself , public upheaval becomes inevitable .
If you would like to support the work that Alt-Market does while also receiving content on advanced tactics for defeating the globalist agenda , subscribe to our exclusive newsletter The Wild Bunch Dispatch .
Learn more about it HERE .
With global tensions spiking , thousands of Americans are moving their IRA or 401 ( k ) into an IRA backed by physical gold .
Now , thanks to a little-known IRS Tax Law , you can too .
Learn how with a free info @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It reveals how physical precious metals can protect your savings , and how to open a Gold IRA .
Click here to get your free Info Kit on Gold .
You can contact Brandon Smith at :

The issue of censorship by major tech companies is a precarious one, and I’m becoming increasingly suspicious of the nature of the debate. There are some complexities, but it can all be boiled down to this:
Big tech social media conglomerates argue that their websites are like any other private business and that they are protected from overt government interference by the US constitution. In other words, they have a right to platform or deplatform anyone they choose. Of course, this is the exact OPPOSITE of what most leftist groups have argued in the past when it comes to private businesses refusing to cooperate with people they disagree with on basic principle, such as LGBT activists, but let’s set that hypocrisy aside for now.
Social media companies have decided that the people they want to deplatform most are conservatives, along anyone else who disagrees with hard left ideologies such as social justice or the handling of the pandemic situation. Statements or content that run contrary to leftist philosophies are simply labeled “hate speech” or “conspiracy theory” and are erased.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Conservatives argue that big tech is a monopoly with far too much power, that social media should be treated more like a public resource or “town square” and that these companies are violating the free speech rights of conservatives by specifically targeting them for censorship. Many conservatives are also demanding that Donald Trump and the government step in to regulate or punish such companies for these actions.
The truth is that both sides are right, and both sides are wrong. The real solution to the problem requires a radical change in how we view the institution of corporations and how they interact with government, and it’s a solution I doubt ANY political official will consider, and that includes Trump.
Let me explain…
Social media and big tech do in fact represent a monopoly, but not in terms most people are familiar with. Instead of acting only as an economic monopoly controlling market share, big tech is also a political monopoly controlling the majority of communication platforms. If only one political and social ideological group dominates every major social media and digital information outlet, this in my view represents a completely unbalanced power dynamic that does indeed threaten the free speech rights of the populace.
Rabid censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal, a scandal that is supported by facts and evidence that big tech has chosen to bury because it’s inconvenient to them rather than a violation of their community guidelines, is just one more example of the incredible danger that social media monopolies present.
Obviously, there is the issue of private property rights to consider. I fully support and defend private property rights and I do believe that a business has the freedom to refuse service to anyone for any reason. Just because you open your doors to the public does not mean the public now owns your labor. You should have the right to refuse labor whenever you wish.
If a business refuses a customer based merely on personal bias, then word is going to get around quickly and that business may lose a large number of potential buyers in the future (this is happening right now with multiple alternative social media companies on the rise). The free market should determine the fate of that business, not state or federal governments.
Government itself is an untrustworthy entity that craves a monopoly of power, and by handing government the authority to micromanage the policies and internal practices of web companies we might be trading the big tech monster for an even more dangerous governmental monster.
Who is to say that the government will stop with sites like Facebook or Twitter or Google? Maybe they will exploit their newfound powers to go after smaller websites as well. Maybe they will attempt to micromanage the entire internet. Maybe they will start dominating and restricting conservative websites instead of the leftist conglomerates we intended, and then we will be doubly screwed.
If you value freedom and the Bill of Rights, then this debate leaves us at an impasse. Both sides (perhaps conveniently) lead to a totalitarian outcome. The thing is, the publicly presented argument is a contrived one, a manipulated discussion that only presents two sides when there are more options to consider. The narrative is fixed, it is a farce.
The public has been led to believe that government and corporations are separate tools that can be used to keep each side in check. This is a lie. Big government and big corporations have always worked together while pretending to be disconnected, and this needs to stop if we are to ever defuse the political time bomb we now face.
To solve the social media censorship debacle we need to examine the very roots of corporations as entities. First, corporations as we know them today are a relatively new phenomenon. Adam Smith described the concept of a corporation as a “joint stock company” in his treatise ‘The Wealth Of Nations’, and stood against them as a threat to free market economics. He specifically outlined their history of monopoly and failure, and criticized their habit of avoiding responsibility for mistakes and crimes.
Joint stock companies were chartered by governments and given special protections from risk, as well as protection from civil litigation (lawsuits). But, they were supposed to be temporary business entities, not perpetual business entities. The point was to allow for the creation of a joint stock company to finish a particular job, such as building a railroad, and once the job was finished the company was dissolved and the government protections were no longer needed. Smith knew that if corporations were ever allowed to become permanent fixtures in an economy, they would result in disaster.
You Might Like
This is exactly what happened in 1886 when the Supreme Court allowed companies like Southern Pacific Railroad to use the 14th Amendment, which was supposed to protect the constitutional rights of newly freed slaves, as a loophole to declare corporations as “legal persons” with all the protections of an individual citizen. Not only that, but with limited liability, corporations actually became super-citizens with protections far beyond normal individuals. Corporations became the preeminent force in the world and it was their relationship with governments that made this possible.
This fact completely debunks today’s notion of what constitutes free markets. Corporations ARE NOT free market structures. They are, in fact, government chartered and government protected monopolies. They are SOCIALIST creations, not free market creations, and therefore they should not exist in a free market society at all.
The alternative option to corporations was for businesses to form “partnerships”, which did not enjoy protection from government, limited liability or the ability to form monopolies. When the owners of a partnership committed a crime, they could be personally held liable for that crime. When a corporation commits a crime, only the company as a vaporous faceless entity can be punished. This is why it is very rare to see company CEOs face prosecution no matter how egregious and catastrophic their actions.
Today, certain corporations continue to enjoy government protections while also enjoying government welfare. Meaning, these companies get a legal shield while also basking in the advantage of tax incentives and taxpayer dollars.
For example, Google (Alphabet and YouTube) has long received huge tax breaks and is rarely if ever forced to pay in full for the massive bandwidth the company uses. In fact, YouTube was facing bandwidth affordability issues until it was purchased by Alphabet and Google, then it no longer had to worry about it – Google gets over 21 times more bandwidth than it actually pays for because of government intervention.
The same rules apply to companies like Twitter, Facebook, Netflix, Apple, etc. All of them enjoy extensive tax breaks as well as cheap bandwidth that makes it impossible for small and medium sized businesses to compete, even if they operate on a superior model or have superior ideas. Many times the corporations pay no taxes whatsoever while smaller businesses are crippled by overt payments.
A true free market requires competition as a rule, but the current system deliberately crushes competition. Again, we live in a socialist framework, not a free market framework.
Now that we understand the nature of big tech and what these companies actually are (creations of government), the debate on social media censorship changes.
How? Take for example the fact that public universities in the US are not legally allowed to interfere with free speech rights because many of them survive by consuming taxpayer dollars. They are PUBLIC institutions, not private. Why then are we treating major corporations that survive on endless taxpayer infusions and incentives as if they are private businesses? They are not – They are publicly funded structures chartered by the government and therefore they should be subject to the same rules on free speech that universities are required to follow.
Said corporations will surely argue against this and will attempt to use legal chicanery to maintain their monopolies. Trying to dismantle them could take decades, and there are no guarantees that government officials will even make the attempt? Why would they? The relationship between government and corporations has been an advantageous one for establishment elites for decades.
Instead of challenging the corporate model in the Supreme Court, an easier option would be to simply take away all welfare and tax incentives for any big tech companies that refuse to allow free speech on their platforms. If Google had to pay normal price for the bandwidth it uses, the corporation would either implode or it would be forced to break apart into multiple smaller companies that would then compete with each other. More competition means lower prices for consumers along with better products. The threat of losing tax incentives would mean more large companies would refrain from censorship.
Donald Trump as president could conceivably make this happen, but he will not, and neither will any other political official. The partnership between government and corporations will continue, I believe, because there are other agendas at play here. The establishment WANTS the public to argue in favor of tech totalitarianism on one side and in favor of government totalitarianism on the other side. They aren’t going to allow any other solutions to enter the discussion.
The only available strategy left for fighting back against big tech is to continue leaving their platforms and building our own. This will take many years to accomplish. The point is, there is a more permanent option, but it requires a complete deconstruction of the socialist government/corporate framework now in place. To confront the power dynamic between governments and major conglomerates is to confront one of the fundamental sources of corruption within our society, which is why it won’t be allowed. And when the system refuses to police itself, public upheaval becomes inevitable.
Courtesy of ALT Market
If you would like to support the work that Alt-Market does while also receiving content on advanced tactics for defeating the globalist agenda, subscribe to our exclusive newsletter The Wild Bunch Dispatch. Learn more about it HERE.
With global tensions spiking, thousands of Americans are moving their IRA or 401(k) into an IRA backed by physical gold. Now, thanks to a little-known IRS Tax Law, you can too. Learn how with a free info kit on gold from Birch Gold Group. It reveals how physical precious metals can protect your savings, and how to open a Gold IRA. Click here to get your free Info Kit on Gold.
You can contact Brandon Smith at:
[email protected]


thedcclothesline--2020-10-22--Kamala Harris Failed To Prosecute Illegal MS-13 Gang Member Just Months Before He Murdered Family

Ramos killed Anthony , Michael , and Matthew in the shooting .
Prosecutors said Ramos shot the Bolognas because he misidentified them as rival gang members who were involved in a gang murder that day .
The murder case rose to prominence as Harris , who is now Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden ’ s running mate , was San Francisco District Attorney .
Despite a plea by Angel Mom Danielle Bologna to seek the death penalty against Ramos , Harris refused and instead sought a life sentence .
take our poll - story continues below Ramos , three months @ @ @ @ @ @ @ run-in with San Francisco police officers .
According to the San Francisco Gate , police had warned Harris ’ office that Ramos was a known MS-13 Gang member with multiple run-ins with the law .
Despite his record , Harris ’ office did not prosecute Ramos , the San Francisco Gate reported in 2008 : In March , three months before the killings , Ramos was arrested in San Francisco after police pulled him over because his car had illegally tinted windows and no front license plate .
An alleged gang member in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but police recovered it and later concluded that it had been used in a double killing , authorities said .
[ Emphasis added ] The police report of the incident cited “ numerous documented contacts ” that officers had with Ramos and the man who allegedly discarded the gun , and said both were active members of the Mara Salvatrucha ( MS-13 ) street gang .
[ Emphasis added ] San Francisco prosecutors , however , declined to file charges against Ramos , saying they couldn ’ t prove that he knew @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Emphasis added ] Harris ’ office claimed they needed another criminal charge Against Ramos in order to prosecute him , another report by the San Francisco Gate stated : Police sent the case to prosecutors in District Attorney Kamala Harris ’ office , who declined to file charges .
They told investigators that there was no evidence that Ramos had known that Lopez had a gun , according to Harris ’ office .
[ Emphasis added ] The gang charge had to have another crime associated with it for prosecutors to bring Ramos @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
[ Emphasis added ] An account of Ramos ’ arrest in March 2008 was published in the Los Angeles Times in July 2008 .
The report notes that after Harris ’ office failed to press any charges against Ramos , he was released a couple of days later : Ramos was also arrested March 30 on a weapons violation , along with an alleged gang member riding in his car .
After he spent several days in jail , authorities decided to file charges against the other man but not him , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hirst , a sheriff ’ s spokeswoman .
[ Emphasis added ] Deportation proceedings against Ramos could have been initiated but were not because of an apparent mix-up between the federal Immigration , Customs and Enforcement Agency and the San Francisco Sheriff ’ s Department , which runs the jail .
[ Emphasis added ] But ICE spokesman Tim Counts said the jail contacted federal immigration officials only once — at 3:44 a.m. April 2 , two hours after Ramos had been released .
[ Emphasis added ] After the Bologna murders , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to seek the death penalty against Ramos .
Harris refused and instead sought a life sentence without parole .

alien
Ramos killed Anthony, Michael, and Matthew in the shooting. Prosecutors said Ramos shot the Bolognas because he misidentified them as rival gang members who were involved in a gang murder that day.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The murder case rose to prominence as Harris, who is now Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden’s running mate, was San Francisco District Attorney. Despite a plea by Angel Mom Danielle Bologna to seek the death penalty against Ramos, Harris refused and instead sought a life sentence.
Ramos, three months before the Bologna murders, had a run-in with San Francisco police officers. According to the San Francisco Gate, police had warned Harris’ office that Ramos was a known MS-13 Gang member with multiple run-ins with the law.
Despite his record, Harris’ office did not prosecute Ramos, the San Francisco Gate reported in 2008:
In March, three months before the killings, Ramos was arrested in San Francisco after police pulled him over because his car had illegally tinted windows and no front license plate. An alleged gang member in the car tried to discard a gun, but police recovered it and later concluded that it had been used in a double killing, authorities said. [Emphasis added]
The police report of the incident cited “numerous documented contacts” that officers had with Ramos and the man who allegedly discarded the gun, and said both were active members of the Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13) street gang. [Emphasis added]
San Francisco prosecutors, however, declined to file charges against Ramos, saying they couldn’t prove that he knew his companion had the gun. [Emphasis added]
Harris’ office claimed they needed another criminal charge Against Ramos in order to prosecute him, another report by the San Francisco Gate stated:
Police sent the case to prosecutors in District Attorney Kamala Harris’ office, who declined to file charges. They told investigators that there was no evidence that Ramos had known that Lopez had a gun, according to Harris’ office. [Emphasis added]
The gang charge had to have another crime associated with it for prosecutors to bring Ramos to trial, police and prosecutors said. [Emphasis added]
An account of Ramos’ arrest in March 2008 was published in the Los Angeles Times in July 2008. The report notes that after Harris’ office failed to press any charges against Ramos, he was released a couple of days later:
Ramos was also arrested March 30 on a weapons violation, along with an alleged gang member riding in his car. After he spent several days in jail, authorities decided to file charges against the other man but not him, and Ramos was released, said Eileen Hirst, a sheriff’s spokeswoman. [Emphasis added]
You Might Like
Deportation proceedings against Ramos could have been initiated but were not because of an apparent mix-up between the federal Immigration, Customs and Enforcement Agency and the San Francisco Sheriff’s Department, which runs the jail. [Emphasis added]
[…]
But ICE spokesman Tim Counts said the jail contacted federal immigration officials only once — at 3:44 a.m. April 2, two hours after Ramos had been released. [Emphasis added]
After the Bologna murders, Angel Mom Danielle Bologna pleaded with Harris to seek the death penalty against Ramos. Harris refused and instead sought a life sentence without parole.


thedcclothesline--2020-10-22--Rush Limbaugh says conventional cancer treatments FAILED, stage 4 cancer went terminal

( Natural News ) Conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh recently issued an update about his cancer diagnosis , and the gist of it is that conventional cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation simply do not work .
Despite undergoing aggressive treatment regimens at the hands of conventional cancer “ experts , ” Limbaugh ’ s stage 4 lung cancer went terminal .
After tweaking things some , Limbaugh is now a little more optimistic , having previously thought that he would not even make it to October , but the whole process has been a “ roller coaster , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In a nutshell , there are lots of ups and downs in this particular illness , ” Limbaugh admitted in a rare moment of transparency concerning his cancer , which he has long kept under wraps .
“ And it can feel like a roller coaster at times that you can ’ t get off of.
” “ And again , I want to stress here that I know countless numbers of you are experiencing the same thing .
If it isn ’ t lung cancer , it ’ s some kind of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you , it ’ s somebody really close to you .
If it isn ’ t an illness , it ’ s something .
We ’ re all going through challenges.
” take our poll - story continues below Limbaugh , who admittedly underwent several rounds of chemotherapy , told his listeners that he “ hate [ d ] the way ” he felt every day , but still trusted the plan because “ it is part and parcel of this.
” In other words , Limbaugh believes in conventional cancer doctors , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are alternative methods of treating cancer that , unlike chemotherapy , do not accelerate the degression towards death .
“ It ’ s tough to realize that the days where I do not think I ’ m under a death sentence are over , ” Limbaugh lamented .
“ We all know that we ’ re going to die at some point , but when you have a terminal disease diagnosis that has a time frame to it , then that puts a different psychological and even physical awareness to it.
” Why @ @ @ @ @ @ @ natural cancer remedies ?
According to Limbaugh , his latest scans shows “ some progression of cancer , ” meaning the chemotherapy he has been receiving is not exactly working as planned .
Prior to this , scans had shown that Limbaugh ’ s cancer had turned “ dormant.
” Something changed , in other words , which is often the case when a patient is receiving toxic doses of chemotherapy , a systemic poison that ruthlessly destroys healthy cells alongside the malignant ones .
Perplexed that his cancer at first appeared to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ growing again , Limbaugh has now arrived at the flawed conclusion that cancer “ eventually outsmarts pretty much everything you throw at it , ” which is simply untrue ( and demonstrates his ignorance of fundamental human health and natural medicine ) .
It is often true , however , for those who rely exclusively on conventional cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation that ravage the immune system and , in many cases , lead to worse outcomes in the end .
While we feel for Limbaugh and hope for a miraculous recovery @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that he needs to learn quickly that the conventional cancer treatment road is a dead end that for most people leads to early death .
For someone who knows full well the corruption of Democrat Party , Limbaugh would seem to be almost clueless about the corruption of Big Pharma , which profits immensely from cases like his where the patient receives round after round of expensive drug treatments , only to come up short in the end .
“ So we have to tweak the treatment plan , which we did , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ keeping additional progression at bay for as long as possible , ” Limbaugh explained .
“ The idea now is to keep it where it is or maybe have it reduce again , ” he added , hopeful that a tweaked conventional treatment plan will produce a more positive outcome .
“ We ’ ve shown that that is possible .
If it happened once , it can happen again.
” For more related news , be sure to check out Cancer.news .

(Natural News) Conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh recently issued an update about his cancer diagnosis, and the gist of it is that conventional cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation simply do not work.
Despite undergoing aggressive treatment regimens at the hands of conventional cancer “experts,” Limbaugh’s stage 4 lung cancer went terminal. After tweaking things some, Limbaugh is now a little more optimistic, having previously thought that he would not even make it to October, but the whole process has been a “roller coaster,” as he puts it.
“In a nutshell, there are lots of ups and downs in this particular illness,” Limbaugh admitted in a rare moment of transparency concerning his cancer, which he has long kept under wraps. “And it can feel like a roller coaster at times that you can’t get off of.”
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
“And again, I want to stress here that I know countless numbers of you are experiencing the same thing. If it isn’t lung cancer, it’s some kind of cancer. If it isn’t you, it’s somebody really close to you. If it isn’t an illness, it’s something. We’re all going through challenges.”
Limbaugh, who admittedly underwent several rounds of chemotherapy, told his listeners that he “hate[d] the way” he felt every day, but still trusted the plan because “it is part and parcel of this.” In other words, Limbaugh believes in conventional cancer doctors, apparently unaware of the fact that there are alternative methods of treating cancer that, unlike chemotherapy, do not accelerate the degression towards death.
“It’s tough to realize that the days where I do not think I’m under a death sentence are over,” Limbaugh lamented. “We all know that we’re going to die at some point, but when you have a terminal disease diagnosis that has a time frame to it, then that puts a different psychological and even physical awareness to it.”
Why doesn’t Rush Limbaugh try some natural cancer remedies?
According to Limbaugh, his latest scans shows “some progression of cancer,” meaning the chemotherapy he has been receiving is not exactly working as planned. Prior to this, scans had shown that Limbaugh’s cancer had turned “dormant.”
Something changed, in other words, which is often the case when a patient is receiving toxic doses of chemotherapy, a systemic poison that ruthlessly destroys healthy cells alongside the malignant ones.
Perplexed that his cancer at first appeared to go dormant, only to later start growing again, Limbaugh has now arrived at the flawed conclusion that cancer “eventually outsmarts pretty much everything you throw at it,” which is simply untrue (and demonstrates his ignorance of fundamental human health and natural medicine).
It is often true, however, for those who rely exclusively on conventional cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation that ravage the immune system and, in many cases, lead to worse outcomes in the end.
While we feel for Limbaugh and hope for a miraculous recovery, the truth of the matter is that he needs to learn quickly that the conventional cancer treatment road is a dead end that for most people leads to early death.
For someone who knows full well the corruption of Democrat Party, Limbaugh would seem to be almost clueless about the corruption of Big Pharma, which profits immensely from cases like his where the patient receives round after round of expensive drug treatments, only to come up short in the end.
“So we have to tweak the treatment plan, which we did, and the chemotherapy drugs in hopes of keeping additional progression at bay for as long as possible,” Limbaugh explained.
“The idea now is to keep it where it is or maybe have it reduce again,” he added, hopeful that a tweaked conventional treatment plan will produce a more positive outcome. “We’ve shown that that is possible. If it happened once, it can happen again.”
For more related news, be sure to check out Cancer.news.
Sources for this article include:
You Might Like
RushLimbaugh.com
NaturalNews.com