thedcclothesline--2020-06-08--From 87% White in 1980 to 60% White in 2020: Minneapolis City Council Vote to Disband Police Departm

From 87% White in 1980 to 60% White in 2020: Minneapolis City Council Vote to Disband Police Department Because of “Racism” Concerns

Previously on SBPDL : The Great Replacement in Minneapolis : from 99 % White in 1910 to 60 % White in 2020… It ’ s been cliche to repeat this over and over again despite no evidence exiting to support the claim being found anywhere in the United States of America .
take our poll - story continues below Minneapolis was 87 % white in 1980 .
It was a thriving city , boasting social capital no other major city in the USA had or could scarcely replicate .
Today , recovering from the George Floyd riots , Minneapolis is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ With the recent vote of the city council to disband the police , there ’ s no way to curtail the flood of white flight from the city .
[ MINNEAPOLIS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ANNOUNCE INTENT TO DISBAND THE POLICE DEPARTMENT , INVEST IN PROVEN COMMUNITY-LED PUBLIC SAFETY , The Appeal , June 7 , 2020 ] : On Sunday afternoon , a veto-proof majority of Minneapolis City Council members will announce their commitment to disbanding the city ’ s embattled police department , which has endured relentless criticism in the wake of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an unarmed Black man , on May 25 .
“ We ’ re here because we hear you .
We are here today because George Floyd was killed by the Minneapolis Police .
We are here because here in Minneapolis and in cities across the United States it is clear that our existing system of policing and public safety is not keeping our communities safe , ” Minneapolis City Council President Lisa Bender said Sunday .
“ Our efforts at incremental reform have failed .
Period.
” The City Council ’ s decision @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , including Minneapolis Public Schools , and the University of Minnesota , and Minneapolis Parks and Recreation , to sever longstanding ties with the MPD .
The announcement today also arrives after several members of the Council have expressed a complete loss of confidence in the Minneapolis Police Department .
“ We are going to dismantle the Minneapolis Police Department , ” tweeted Council Member Jeremiah Ellison on June 4 , pledging to “ dramatically rethink ” the city ’ s approach to emergency response .
In a TIME op-ed published the next @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the MPD ’ s lengthy track record of misconduct and “ decades-long history of violence and discrimination ” —all of which are subjects of an ongoing Minnesota Department of Human Rights investigation—as compelling justifications for the department ’ s disbandment .
“ We can resolve confusion over a $ 20 grocery transaction without drawing a weapon or pulling out handcuffs , ” Fletcher wrote .
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said last night that he opposed disbanding the police department at a protest organized and led by Black Visions Collective against police violence in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a thundering chorus of boos and chants of “ Shame !
” and “ Go home , Jacob , go home !
” The New York Times called the scene a “ humiliation on a scale almost unimaginable outside of cinema or nightmare.
” “ The last Democratic mayor , Betsy Hodges , handled the murder of Jamar [ Clark ] poorly .
We told her she was going to lose her job .
And she did , ” Miski Noor , a Black Visions Collective organizer , said on Frey ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ taking office in January 2018 , Frey has overseen reforms to the MPD ’ s body camera policy that impose harsher discipline on officers who fail to comply , and barredofficers from participating in so-called “ Bulletproof Warrior ” training , which encourages law enforcement to use deadly force if they feel their lives are in jeopardy .
The officer who shot and killed Philando Castile during a 2016 traffic stop had attended a seminar two years earlier .
More recently , however , Frey has faced criticism from community groups for supporting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and for the city ’ s failure to invest significantly in community-based public safety programs during his tenure .
For years , activists have argued that MPD has failed to actually keep the city safe , and City Councilmembers echoed that sentiment today during their announcement .
MPD ’ s record for solving serious crimes in the city is consistently low .
For example , in 2019 , Minneapolis police only cleared 56 percent of cases in which a person was killed .
For rapes , the police department ’ s solve @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , their clearance rate for rape was just 22 percent .
In other words , four out of every five rapes go unsolved in Minneapolis .
Further casting doubt on the department ’ s commitment to solving sexual assaults , MPD announced last year the discovery of 1,700 untested rape kits spanning 30 years , which officials said had been misplaced .
The Council ’ s move is consistent with rapidly-shifting public opinion regarding the urgency of overhauling the American model of law enforcement .
Since Floyd ’ s killing and the protests @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and New York City have called for making deep cuts to swollen police budgets and reallocating those funds for education , affordable housing , and other social services .
Law enforcement officers are not equipped to be experts in responding to mental health crises , often leading to tragic results—nationally , about half of police killings involve someone living with mental illness or disability .
As a result , public health experts have long advocated for dispatching medical professionals and/or social workers , not armed police , to respond to calls related to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from Data for Progress indicates that more than two-thirds of voters—68 percent—support the creation of such programs , versions of which are already in place in other cities such as , Eugene , Oregon ; Austin , Texas ; and Denver , Colorado .
“ Our commitment is to do what is necessary to keep every single member of our community safe and to tell the truth that the Minneapolis Police are not doing that , ” Bender said Sunday .
“ Our commitment is to end our city ’ s toxic relationship @ @ @ @ @ @ @ end policing as we know it , and to recreate systems of public safety that actually keep us safe.
” Forty years is but a blink of the eye .
From 87 % white to 60 % white in 2020 .
And now we see what happens when the anti-white white population of the city is ascendant , courtesy of the racial changes taking place in Minneapolis .
Do not weep for the past , nor feel nostalgic for it .
There ’ s no bringing it back .
We can see what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not coming back .
All we can deal with is the present , what is and what isn ’ t .
And as Minneapolis spirals out of control , nearing the pivotal moment when it becomes majority-minority , we learn just how valuable homogeneity is to providing peace , stability and social capital all completely absent in a diverse society .
Do not weep for what ’ s happening in the present , or shed one tear for the past ; it ’ s all but a bridge to our future , if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ today to provide the answer ensuring our tomorrow .
• Minneapolis Cop Charged In George Floyd ’ s Murder Was Hired Despite Having A Criminal Record With 7 Convictions • Minneapolis Mayor Wants $ 55 Million Of Your Money To Repair Riot Damages That He Could Have Helped Stop • After Massive Uprising , City Council Members Look to Entirely Disband Minneapolis PD

Previously on SBPDL: The Great Replacement in Minneapolis: from 99% White in 1910 to 60% White in 2020…
Diversity is our greatest strength.
It’s been cliche to repeat this over and over again despite no evidence exiting to support the claim being found anywhere in the United States of America.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Absolutely none.
Minneapolis was 87% white in 1980. It was a thriving city, boasting social capital no other major city in the USA had or could scarcely replicate.
Today, recovering from the George Floyd riots, Minneapolis is on the verge of being majority-minority. With the recent vote of the city council to disband the police, there’s no way to curtail the flood of white flight from the city. [MINNEAPOLIS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ANNOUNCE INTENT TO DISBAND THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, INVEST IN PROVEN COMMUNITY-LED PUBLIC SAFETY, The Appeal, June 7, 2020]:
On Sunday afternoon, a veto-proof majority of Minneapolis City Council members will announce their commitment to disbanding the city’s embattled police department, which has endured relentless criticism in the wake of the police killing of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man, on May 25.
“We’re here because we hear you. We are here today because George Floyd was killed by the Minneapolis Police. We are here because here in Minneapolis and in cities across the United States it is clear that our existing system of policing and public safety is not keeping our communities safe,” Minneapolis City Council President Lisa Bender said Sunday. “Our efforts at incremental reform have failed. Period.”
The City Council’s decision follows those of several other high-profile partners, including Minneapolis Public Schools, and the University of Minnesota, and Minneapolis Parks and Recreation, to sever longstanding ties with the MPD.
The announcement today also arrives after several members of the Council have expressed a complete loss of confidence in the Minneapolis Police Department.
“We are going to dismantle the Minneapolis Police Department,” tweeted Council Member Jeremiah Ellison on June 4, pledging to “dramatically rethink” the city’s approach to emergency response. In a TIME op-ed published the next day, Council Member Steve Fletcher cited the MPD’s lengthy track record of misconduct and “decades-long history of violence and discrimination”—all of which are subjects of an ongoing Minnesota Department of Human Rights investigation—as compelling justifications for the department’s disbandment. “We can resolve confusion over a $20 grocery transaction without drawing a weapon or pulling out handcuffs,” Fletcher wrote.
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said last night that he opposed disbanding the police department at a protest organized and led by Black Visions Collective against police violence in the city. That answer earned him a thundering chorus of boos and chants of “Shame!” and “Go home, Jacob, go home!” The New York Times called the scene a “humiliation on a scale almost unimaginable outside of cinema or nightmare.”“The last Democratic mayor, Betsy Hodges, handled the murder of Jamar [Clark] poorly. We told her she was going to lose her job. And she did,” Miski Noor, a Black Visions Collective organizer, said on Frey’s refusal to disband the Minneapolis Police Department.Since taking office in January 2018, Frey has overseen reforms to the MPD’s body camera policy that impose harsher discipline on officers who fail to comply, and barredofficers from participating in so-called “Bulletproof Warrior” training, which encourages law enforcement to use deadly force if they feel their lives are in jeopardy. The officer who shot and killed Philando Castile during a 2016 traffic stop had attended a seminar two years earlier.
More recently, however, Frey has faced criticism from community groups for supporting increases to the MPD’s budget, and for the city’s failure to invest significantly in community-based public safety programs during his tenure. For years, activists have argued that MPD has failed to actually keep the city safe, and City Councilmembers echoed that sentiment today during their announcement. MPD’s record for solving serious crimes in the city is consistently low. For example, in 2019, Minneapolis police only cleared 56 percent of cases in which a person was killed. For rapes, the police department’s solve rate is abysmally low. In 2018, their clearance rate for rape was just 22 percent. In other words, four out of every five rapes go unsolved in Minneapolis. Further casting doubt on the department’s commitment to solving sexual assaults, MPD announced last year the discovery of 1,700 untested rape kits spanning 30 years, which officials said had been misplaced.
The Council’s move is consistent with rapidly-shifting public opinion regarding the urgency of overhauling the American model of law enforcement. Since Floyd’s killing and the protests that ensued, officials in Los Angeles and New York City have called for making deep cuts to swollen police budgets and reallocating those funds for education, affordable housing, and other social services. Law enforcement officers are not equipped to be experts in responding to mental health crises, often leading to tragic results—nationally, about half of police killings involve someone living with mental illness or disability. As a result, public health experts have long advocated for dispatching medical professionals and/or social workers, not armed police, to respond to calls related to substance use and mental health. Polling from Data for Progress indicates that more than two-thirds of voters—68 percent—support the creation of such programs, versions of which are already in place in other cities such as, Eugene, Oregon; Austin, Texas; and Denver, Colorado.
“Our commitment is to do what is necessary to keep every single member of our community safe and to tell the truth that the Minneapolis Police are not doing that,” Bender said Sunday. “Our commitment is to end our city’s toxic relationship with the Minneapolis Police Department, to end policing as we know it, and to recreate systems of public safety that actually keep us safe.”
Forty years is but a blink of the eye. From 87% white to 60% white in 2020.
You Might Like
And now we see what happens when the anti-white white population of the city is ascendant, courtesy of the racial changes taking place in Minneapolis.
Do not weep for the past, nor feel nostalgic for it. There’s no bringing it back. We can see what once was, but it’s not coming back.
All we can deal with is the present, what is and what isn’t.
And as Minneapolis spirals out of control, nearing the pivotal moment when it becomes majority-minority, we learn just how valuable homogeneity is to providing peace, stability and social capital all completely absent in a diverse society.
Do not weep for what’s happening in the present, or shed one tear for the past; it’s all but a bridge to our future, if we decide to utilize the failures of today to provide the answer ensuring our tomorrow.
Courtesy of UNZ.com
Minneapolis


thedcclothesline--2020-06-08--Agenda 21 Requires Martial Law

Agenda 21 Requires Martial Law

Richie from Boston has taken to boldly stating the obvious .
In order to force people to accept Agenda 21 and not fight back , military presence is mandatory .
The United States government is wholly pushing the agenda forward for the elitists and we just keep falling for it and hate those who are trying to warn us .
The governments of the world are already busy crafting the next crisis .
Once the rioting and looting dies down , another manufactured disaster will strike .
It ’ ll be one thing after another until “ Plandemic 2 ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ maybe something even bigger will surface before then even and they won ’ t need “ a second wave.
” Ritchie from Boston touches some nerves in one of his most recent videos .
His goal isn ’ t to appease those who listen , it ’ s to wake them up .
“ Everything I am saying , you can still look up for yourself right now .
And if you don ’ t , and what ’ s coming comes , you helped it happen , ” says Richie .
Is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
Yep .
Is it hard to read things that go against the indoctrination ?
Yes .
It was tough for me , and Richie admits it was tough for him too .
But you have to open your eyes and stop giving people power over you .
“ Get rid of your ego .
Get rid of your pride .
Get rid of your…everything because we need to move past that .
Because the riots are the second stage .
They thought COVID would be enough to set it [ Agenda 21 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ law in the United States in order to take away all the weapons etc .
etc….they ’ re gon na use contact tracing in the New World Order to monitor you every single millisecond of every single day , ” days Richie .
take our poll - story continues below “ It ’ s time to wake up .
The riots ?
There are thousands of documents showing there are professional rioters and who they ’ re paid by .
They want troops on the ground and once troops are on the ground @ @ @ @ @ @ @ provocateurs , that have been destroying these peaceful protests , will also be the ones taking shots at the National Guard , etc .
And once that happens , your guns are gone !
” Have you ever stopped to ponder WHY some of us are saying stop asking more material law and military interference ?
“ This country is gone .
You need to wake up and you need to wake up NOW !
There ’ s a lot going on here , people .
But I ’ ll tell you a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your conspiracy bullshit all you want…that was taught to you through television , movies , music , mainstream .
But we ’ re living in the middle of one of the biggest conspiracies that ’ s ever been perpetrated on humanity EVER…The end game is to get troops on the ground .
WE ’ RE HERE .
You can hate me all you want .
I don ’ t give a F*ck .
I didn ’ t do this to be popular…this world is completely ridiculous .
But you ain ’ t gon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ longer if you don ’ t heed my advice.
” It ’ s become apparent that the elitists are on a timeline and must achieve certain goals to make sure they maintain power forever .
When is that timeline ?
I don ’ t know .
All I know is we have to realize this is all a war for our minds , emotions , and perception .
We also need to realize that we have only a finite amount of time before no amount of awareness will matter because they ’ ve @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sit back and “ trust the plan ” and actually believe that Trump is going to use the system ( military tribunals ) to take down those elitists ( Obama , Hillary , The Federal Reserve ) who created the system , do so .
But you ’ re still stuck in the left/right paradigm that is being used to divide to force us into Agenda 21 .
Using their system to punish them isn ’ t ever going to work , and Trump has to know that .
If he actually cared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , he would have ended the Fed and the alphabet agencies that are destroying our freedom .
He wouldn ’ t be patting the deep state ’ s backside and he wouldn ’ t have sold Americans into debt slavery using the CARES Act .
Using the system to beat the system is a ludicrous idea .
We shouldn ’ t expect peace as long as there are people in power over other people .
There ’ s a simple solution .
Realize you own yourself and reject the system they are trying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t want to see because it ’ s easier to be their slave , It ’ s easy to trust Trump will save you .
It ’ s time we save ourselves .
Take responsibility for your own life without the ruling class , or you will get to see exactly what a “ New World Order ” of enslavement will look like .
• U.S. military preparing to implement medical martial law due to coronavirus pandemic • REX 84 : FEMA Camps are REAL — The Plan for Martial Law in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Nevada State Prison being converted into a massive FEMA Camp ahead of Jade Helm ?

Richie from Boston has taken to boldly stating the obvious. In order to force people to accept Agenda 21 and not fight back, military presence is mandatory. The United States government is wholly pushing the agenda forward for the elitists and we just keep falling for it and hate those who are trying to warn us.
The governments of the world are already busy crafting the next crisis. Once the rioting and looting dies down, another manufactured disaster will strike. It’ll be one thing after another until “Plandemic 2” hits in the fall. Heck, maybe something even bigger will surface before then even and they won’t need “a second wave.” Ritchie from Boston touches some nerves in one of his most recent videos. His goal isn’t to appease those who listen, it’s to wake them up.
“Everything I am saying, you can still look up for yourself right now. And if you don’t, and what’s coming comes, you helped it happen,” says Richie. Is it difficult to bust through cognitive dissonance? Yep. Is it hard to read things that go against the indoctrination? Yes. It was tough for me, and Richie admits it was tough for him too. But you have to open your eyes and stop giving people power over you.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
“Get rid of your ego. Get rid of your pride. Get rid of your…everything because we need to move past that. Because the riots are the second stage. They thought COVID would be enough to set it [Agenda 21 takeover] off. They NEED martial law in the United States in order to take away all the weapons etc. etc….they’re gonna use contact tracing in the New World Order to monitor you every single millisecond of every single day,” days Richie.
“It’s time to wake up. The riots? There are thousands of documents showing there are professional rioters and who they’re paid by. They want troops on the ground and once troops are on the ground, the same paid agitators, agent provocateurs, that have been destroying these peaceful protests, will also be the ones taking shots at the National Guard, etc. And once that happens, your guns are gone!” Have you ever stopped to ponder WHY some of us are saying stop asking more material law and military interference? “This country is gone. You need to wake up and you need to wake up NOW! There’s a lot going on here, people. But I’ll tell you a little secret, you can talk all your conspiracy bullshit all you want…that was taught to you through television, movies, music, mainstream. But we’re living in the middle of one of the biggest conspiracies that’s ever been perpetrated on humanity EVER…The end game is to get troops on the ground. WE’RE HERE. You can hate me all you want. I don’t give a F*ck. I didn’t do this to be popular…this world is completely ridiculous. But you ain’t gonna be able to hate me much longer if you don’t heed my advice.”
It’s become apparent that the elitists are on a timeline and must achieve certain goals to make sure they maintain power forever. When is that timeline? I don’t know. All I know is we have to realize this is all a war for our minds, emotions, and perception. We also need to realize that we have only a finite amount of time before no amount of awareness will matter because they’ve already won.
If you want to sit back and “trust the plan” and actually believe that Trump is going to use the system (military tribunals) to take down those elitists (Obama, Hillary, The Federal Reserve) who created the system, do so. But you’re still stuck in the left/right paradigm that is being used to divide to force us into Agenda 21. Using their system to punish them isn’t ever going to work, and Trump has to know that. If he actually cared about liberty, freedom, and justice, he would have ended the Fed and the alphabet agencies that are destroying our freedom. He wouldn’t be patting the deep state’s backside and he wouldn’t have sold Americans into debt slavery using the CARES Act. Using the system to beat the system is a ludicrous idea.
We shouldn’t expect peace as long as there are people in power over other people. There’s a simple solution. Realize you own yourself and reject the system they are trying to force upon you. Most don’t want to see because it’s easier to be their slave, It’s easy to trust Trump will save you. It’s time we save ourselves. Take responsibility for your own life without the ruling class, or you will get to see exactly what a “New World Order” of enslavement will look like.
Article posted with permission from Mac Slavo
h/t TWS
Martial Law & FEMA Camps


thedcclothesline--2020-06-08--His Name Is Sgt. Stephen Williams: Two Blacks Murder White Police Officer in Alabama

PK NOTE : Their Lives Matter Too .
It ’ s a book you must pick up .
Names you ’ ve never encountered , stories you ’ ve never read about , all for one , unmentionable reason : black on white murder .
We were never supposed to notice what ’ s happening .
We were never supposed to catalogue the names and tell their stories .
But we did .
But we have .
Their Lives Matter Too .
Never forget : to Corporate America , Hollywood , Academia , Democrats , Blacks , and even many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Black Lives Matter more than yours .
Tapero Corlene Johnson and Marquisha Annissa Tyson are two such black lives that had they been taken by white police officer , Sgt .
Stephen Williams , the entire world would know their name .
As it is , just another story of two blacks ( this time in Alabama ) who simply murdered yet another white police officer .
[ 2 charged in fatal shooting of Moody police Sgt .
Stephen Williams , Al.com , June 5 , 2020 ] : take our poll - @ @ @ @ @ @ @ filed against two in the shooting death of Moody police Sgt .
Stephen Williams .
St. Clair County district attorney Lyle Harmon on Friday announced the arrests of Tapero Corlene Johnson , 27 , and Marquisha Annissa Tyson , 28 , both of the Birmingham area , in the Tuesday night shooting .
“ One of the best among us was taken viciously , ” said St. Clair Sheriff Billy Murray .
Williams , a 50-year-old father of three , had been a police officer for 23 years , the last three of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He began his law enforcement career at the Bessemer Police Department .
Chief Thomas Hunt Hunt said Friday Williams will be promoted to lieutenant .
He had just been promoted to sergeant in the past year and was a recipient of the Officer of the Year award in memory of Keith Turner , who was shot to death June 27 , 1998 and was the last Moody officer killed in the line of duty .
“ Oh , he was awesome , ’ ’ Hunt said of Williams .
“ He was just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , fun to be around.
” “ He was very thorough in his reports , a good teacher , a good mentor , ’ ’ the chief said .
“ A lot of the guys looked up to Steve.
” “ All I can ask is for everybody to please be in prayer for the Williams family and for the Moody Police Department , ” Hunt said .
The shooting happened shortly before 9:30 p.m. Tuesday at the motel on Moody Parkway .
A medical helicopter was sent for Williams , but the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ UAB Hospital .
Amar Fouda just moved into the Super 8 on U.S. 411 .
He said it was about 9:25 when he heard a lot of noise in Room 214 , which is directly next to his room .
“ I heard like an AK-47 , ’ ’ he said .
Fouda said he ran into the bathroom and hid in the tub .
When he saw blue lights come on the scene , he looked outside .
“ I saw one of the officers , he was down , ’ ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t know why police were at the motel but said his neighbors “ had been making a lot of noise.
” Funeral arrangements have been announced .
Williams ’ visitation will be Sunday , June 7 , from 5 p.m. until 9 p.m. at Ridout ’ s Southern Heritage Funeral Home at 1011 Cahaba Valley Road in Pelham .
His funeral will be held on Monday at 11 a.m. at First Baptist Church in Moody on Church Street .
More than 1,000 Moody residents have signed a petition urging the city council @ @ @ @ @ @ @ motel where Williams was shot , arguing the shooting “ has escalated the need to close this business for good.
” Amy Stewart , a Moody resident who started the petition , said the shooting of Williams was the latest incident that showed the motel does not deserve a business license .
“ The recent slaying of Sergeant Stephen Williams on Tuesday June 2 , 2020 has escalated the need to close this business for good , ” Stewart ’ s petition reads .
“ We ask that the city council and Mayor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the safety of our community.
” Had George Floyd killed Officer Derek Chauvin in Minneapolis during the latter ’ s arrest of the black suspect , no one outside of Minneapolis would know the story of the white police officer murdered by a black criminal .
Flip the script , and cities are burning nationwide .
White lives don ’ t matter , unless they are police officers taking the life of a black career criminal .
Then , cities must burn .
His Name is Sgt .
Stephen Williams .
You @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Drew Brees found out when making remarks about respecting the flag of the United States , this is no longer our country .
• His Name Is Bradley Brown : In America ’ s Most Affluent Black County , Three Black Males Murder White Teenager • Her Name Is Madison Harris : White Teenager Murdered by Five Blacks in Biloxi , Mississippi • His Name Is Matthew Carter : White 17-Year-Old High School Senior in Louisiana Murdered in “ Carjacking Gone Wrong ” by Two Black Teenagers ( Aged 13 and 14 ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ White 17-Year-Old High School Senior in Louisiana Murdered in “ Carjacking Gone Wrong ” by Two Black Teenagers ( Aged 13 and 14 ) • His Name Is Levi Cole Ellerbe : White Six-Month Old Kidnapped , Burned Alive and Murdered by Black Woman

PK NOTE: Their Lives Matter Too. It’s a book you must pick up. Names you’ve never encountered, stories you’ve never read about, all for one, unmentionable reason: black on white murder. We were never supposed to notice what’s happening. We were never supposed to catalogue the names and tell their stories. But we did. But we have. Their Lives Matter Too.
Never forget: to Corporate America, Hollywood, Academia, Democrats, Blacks, and even many elected members of the Republican Party, Black Lives Matter more than yours.
Tapero Corlene Johnson and Marquisha Annissa Tyson are two such black lives that had they been taken by white police officer, Sgt. Stephen Williams, the entire world would know their name.
As it is, just another story of two blacks (this time in Alabama) who simply murdered yet another white police officer. [2 charged in fatal shooting of Moody police Sgt. Stephen Williams, Al.com, June 5, 2020]:
take our poll - story continues below
Will the 2nd Amendment Be Destroyed By the Biden Admin? Will the 2nd Amendment Be Destroyed By the Biden Admin?
Would You Vote for Trump If He Runs In 2024? * Yes Yes, Only Parts Not a Chance
Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Completing this poll grants you access to DC Dirty Laundry updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Formal charges have been filed against two in the shooting death of Moody police Sgt. Stephen Williams.
St. Clair County district attorney Lyle Harmon on Friday announced the arrests of Tapero Corlene Johnson, 27, and Marquisha Annissa Tyson, 28, both of the Birmingham area, in the Tuesday night shooting.
“One of the best among us was taken viciously,” said St. Clair Sheriff Billy Murray.
Williams, a 50-year-old father of three, had been a police officer for 23 years, the last three of those at the Moody Police Department. He began his law enforcement career at the Bessemer Police Department.
Chief Thomas Hunt Hunt said Friday Williams will be promoted to lieutenant. He had just been promoted to sergeant in the past year and was a recipient of the Officer of the Year award in memory of Keith Turner, who was shot to death June 27, 1998 and was the last Moody officer killed in the line of duty.
“Oh, he was awesome,’’ Hunt said of Williams. “He was just a good man, a good person, fun to be around.”
“He was very thorough in his reports, a good teacher, a good mentor,’’ the chief said. “A lot of the guys looked up to Steve.”
“All I can ask is for everybody to please be in prayer for the Williams family and for the Moody Police Department,” Hunt said.
The shooting happened shortly before 9:30 p.m. Tuesday at the motel on Moody Parkway. A medical helicopter was sent for Williams, but the officer was instead taken by ambulance to UAB Hospital.
Amar Fouda just moved into the Super 8 on U.S. 411. He said it was about 9:25 when he heard a lot of noise in Room 214, which is directly next to his room.
“I heard like an AK-47,’’ he said. Fouda said he ran into the bathroom and hid in the tub.
When he saw blue lights come on the scene, he looked outside. “I saw one of the officers, he was down,’’ Fouda said.
He said he didn’t know why police were at the motel but said his neighbors “had been making a lot of noise.”
Funeral arrangements have been announced. Williams’ visitation will be Sunday, June 7, from 5 p.m. until 9 p.m. at Ridout’s Southern Heritage Funeral Home at 1011 Cahaba Valley Road in Pelham. His funeral will be held on Monday at 11 a.m. at First Baptist Church in Moody on Church Street.
More than 1,000 Moody residents have signed a petition urging the city council to revoke the business license of the motel where Williams was shot, arguing the shooting “has escalated the need to close this business for good.”
Amy Stewart, a Moody resident who started the petition, said the shooting of Williams was the latest incident that showed the motel does not deserve a business license.
“The recent slaying of Sergeant Stephen Williams on Tuesday June 2, 2020 has escalated the need to close this business for good,” Stewart’s petition reads. “We ask that the city council and Mayor Joe Lee revoke their business license immediately for the safety of our community.”
Had George Floyd killed Officer Derek Chauvin in Minneapolis during the latter’s arrest of the black suspect, no one outside of Minneapolis would know the story of the white police officer murdered by a black criminal.
Flip the script, and cities are burning nationwide.
White lives don’t matter, unless they are police officers taking the life of a black career criminal. Then, cities must burn.
His Name is Sgt. Stephen Williams. You deserved better, sir. But as Drew Brees found out when making remarks about respecting the flag of the United States, this is no longer our country.
Their Lives Matter Too.
Courtesy of UNZ.com
His/Her Name is…


thedcclothesline--2020-06-08--Looting and Destruction Will Not Force a Revolution, It Will Bring About a Massive Police State

There is something being concocted in the dens of power , far beyond the public eye , and it doesn ’ t bode well for the future of this country .
Anytime you have an entire nation so mesmerized by political theater and public spectacle that they are oblivious to all else , you ’ d better beware .
take our poll - story continues below Anytime you have a government that operates in the shadows , speaks in a language of force , and rules by fiat , you ’ d better beware .
And anytime you have a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as to ensure that they are never seen , heard or heeded by those elected to represent them , you ’ d better beware .
What is unfolding before us is not a revolution .
The looting , the burning , the rioting , the violence : this is an anti-revolution .
The protesters are playing right into the government ’ s hands , because the powers-that-be want this .
They want an excuse to lockdown the nation and throw the switch to all-out martial law .
They want a reason to make @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s happening faster than we can keep up .
The Justice Department is deploying federal prison riot teams to various cities .
More than half of the nation ’ s governors are calling on the National Guard to quell civil unrest .
Growing numbers of cities , having just barely emerged from a coronavirus lockdown , are once again being locked down , this time in response to the growing upheaval .
This is how it begins .
It ’ s that dystopian 2030 Pentagon training video all over again , which anticipates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ martial law ( use armed forces to solve domestic political and social problems ) in order to navigate a world bedeviled by “ criminal networks , ” “ substandard infrastructure , ” “ religious and ethnic tensions , ” “ impoverishment , slums , ” “ open landfills , over-burdened sewers , ” a “ growing mass of unemployed , ” and an urban landscape in which the prosperous economic elite must be protected from the impoverishment of the have nots .
The architects of the police state have us exactly where they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , gasping for breath , desperate for freedom , grappling for some semblance of a future that does not resemble the totalitarian prison being erected around us .
This way lies certain tyranny .
For just one fleeting moment , “ we the people ” seemed united in our outrage over this latest killing of an unarmed man by a cop hyped up on his own authority and the power of his uniform .
Indeed , it didn ’ t take long—no surprise there—for us to quickly become divided again , polarized by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mobs taking to the streets , reeking of madness and mayhem .
Deliberately or not , the rioters have directed our attention away from the government ’ s crimes and onto their own .
Don ’ t allow yourself to be so distracted .
Let ’ s not lose sight of what started all of this in the first place : the U.S. government .
More than terrorism , more than domestic extremism , more than gun violence and organized crime , the systemic violence being perpetrated by agents of the government constitutes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ liberty and property of its citizens than any of the so-called dangers from which the government claims to protect us .
Case in point : George Floyd died at the hands of the American police state .
The callous , cold-blooded murder of the unarmed , 46-year-old black man by police is nothing new : for 8 minutes and 46 seconds , police knelt on Floyd ’ s neck while the man pleaded for his life , struggled to breathe , cried out for his dead mother , and finally passed out and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a broken system of policing that has placed “ we the people ” at the mercy of militarized cops who have almost absolute discretion to decide who is a threat , what constitutes resistance , and how harshly they can deal with the citizens they were appointed to “ serve and protect.
” Daily , Americans are being shot , stripped , searched , choked , beaten and tasered by police for little more than daring to frown , smile , question , challenge an order or just exist .
I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unarmed people are who being shot and killed for just standing a certain way , or moving a certain way , or holding something—anything—that police could misinterpret to be a gun , or igniting some trigger-centric fear in a police officer ’ s mind that has nothing to do with an actual threat to their safety .
Killed by police for standing in a “ shooting stance.
” Killed for holding a cell phone .
Killed for holding a baseball bat .
Killed for opening the front door .
Killed for being a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Killed for approaching police while holding a metal spoon .
Killed for running in an aggressive manner while holding a tree branch .
Killed for crawling around naked .
Killed for hunching over in a defensive posture .
Killed because a police officer accidentally fired his gun instead of his taser .
Killed for wearing dark pants and a basketball jersey .
Killed for reaching for his license and registration during a traffic stop .
Killed for driving while deaf .
Killed for being homeless .
Killed for brandishing a shoehorn .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ having his car break down on the road .
Killed for holding a garden hose .
Now you can make all kinds of excuses to justify these shootings , and in fact that ’ s exactly what you ’ ll hear from politicians , police unions , law enforcement officials and individuals who are more than happy to march in lockstep with the police .
However , as these incidents make clear , the only truly compliant , submissive and obedient citizen in a police state is a dead one .
Sad , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we have gone from a nation of laws—where the least among us had just as much right to be treated with dignity and respect as the next person ( in principle , at least ) —to a nation of law enforcers ( revenue collectors with weapons ) who treat us all like suspects and criminals ?
This is not how you keep the peace .
This is not justice .
This is not even law and order .
This is certainly not freedom .
This is the illusion of freedom .
Unfortunately , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government of psychopaths , scoundrels , spies , thugs , thieves , gangsters , ruffians , rapists , extortionists , bounty hunters , battle-ready warriors and cold-blooded killers who communicate using a language of force and oppression .
The facts speak for themselves .
We ’ re being ravaged by a government of ruffians , rapists and killers .
It ’ s not just the police shootings of unarmed citizens that are worrisome .
It ’ s the SWAT team raids gone wrong that are leaving innocent citizens wounded , children terrorized and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the roadside strip searches—in some cases , cavity searches of men and women alike carried out in full view of the public—in pursuit of drugs that are never found .
It ’ s the potentially lethal—and unwarranted—use of so-called “ nonlethal ” weapons such as tasers on children for “ mouthing off to a police officer .
For trying to run from the principal ’ s office .
For , at the age of 12 , getting into a fight with another girl.
” We ’ re being held at gunpoint by a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Americans are being made to jump through an increasing number of hoops in order to exercise their Second Amendment right to own a gun , the government is arming its own civilian employees to the hilt with guns , ammunition and military-style equipment , authorizing them to make arrests , and training them in military tactics .
Among the agencies being supplied with night-vision equipment , body armor , hollow-point bullets , shotguns , drones , assault rifles and LP gas cannons are the Smithsonian , U.S. Mint , Health and Human Services @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Administration , Social Security Administration , National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration , Education Department , Energy Department , Bureau of Engraving and Printing and an assortment of public universities .
There are now reportedly more bureaucratic ( non-military ) government civilians armed with high-tech , deadly weapons than U.S. Marines .
That doesn ’ t even begin to touch on the government ’ s arsenal , the transformation of local police into extensions of the military , and the speed with which the nation could be locked down under martial law depending on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is preparing for war—and a civil war , at that—and “ we the people ” are the perceived enemy .
We ’ re being taken advantage of by a government of scoundrels , idiots and cowards .
American satirist H.L .
Mencken calculated that “ Congress consists of one-third , more or less , scoundrels ; two-thirds , more or less , idiots ; and three-thirds , more or less , poltroons.
” By and large , Americans seem to agree .
When you ’ ve got government representatives who spend a large @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being feted by lobbyists , shuffling through a lucrative revolving door between public service and lobbying , and making themselves available to anyone with enough money to secure access to a congressional office , you ’ re in the clutches of a corrupt oligarchy .
Mind you , these same elected officials rarely read the legislation they ’ re enacting , nor do they seem capable of enacting much legislation that actually helps rather than hinders the plight of the American citizen .
We ’ re being locked up by a government of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ carceral state , spending three times more on our prisons than on our schools and imprisoning close to a quarter of the world ’ s prisoners , despite the fact that crime is at an all-time low and the U.S. makes up only 5 % of the world ’ s population .
The rise of overcriminalization and profit-driven private prisons provides even greater incentives for locking up American citizens for such non-violent “ crimes ” as having an overgrown lawn .
As the Boston Review points out , “ America ’ s contemporary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and parole … makes money through asset forfeiture , lucrative public contracts from private service providers , and by directly extracting revenue and unpaid labor from populations of color and the poor .
In states and municipalities throughout the country , the criminal justice system defrays costs by forcing prisoners and their families to pay for punishment .
It also allows private service providers to charge outrageous fees for everyday needs such as telephone calls .
As a result people facing even minor criminal charges can easily find themselves trapped in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and incarceration.
” We ’ re being spied on by a government of Peeping Toms .
The government , aided by its corporate allies , is watching everything you do , reading everything you write , listening to everything you say , and monitoring everything you spend .
Omnipresent surveillance is paving the way for government programs that profile citizens , document their behavior and attempt to predict what they might do in the future , whether it ’ s what they might buy , what politician they might support , or what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The impact of this far-reaching surveillance , according to Psychology Today , is “ reduced trust , increased conformity , and even diminished civic participation.
” As technology analyst Jillian C. York concludes , “ Mass surveillance without due process—whether undertaken by the government of Bahrain , Russia , the US , or anywhere in between—threatens to stifle and smother that dissent , leaving in its wake a populace cowed by fear.
” We ’ re being forced to surrender our freedoms—and those of our children—to a government of extortionists , money launderers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have been repeatedly sold a bill of goods about how the government needs more money , more expansive powers , and more secrecy ( secret courts , secret budgets , secret military campaigns , secret surveillance ) in order to keep us safe .
Under the guise of fighting its wars on terror , drugs , domestic extremism , pandemics and civil unrest , the government has spent billions in taxpayer dollars on endless wars that have sown the seeds of blowback , surveillance programs that have subjected all Americans to a surveillance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ turned communities into warzones .
We ’ re being robbed blind by a government of thieves .
Americans no longer have any real protection against government agents empowered to seize private property at will .
For instance , police agencies under the guise of asset forfeiture laws are taking property based on little more than a suspicion of criminal activity .
And we ’ re being forced to live in a perpetual state of emergency .
From 9/11 through the COVID-19 lockdowns and now the threat of martial law in the face of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the rise of an “ emergency state ” that justifies all manner of government tyranny and power grabs in the so-called name of national security .
Whatever else it may be—a danger , a menace , a threat—the U.S. government is certainly not looking out for our best interests , nor is it in any way a friend to freedom .
When the government views itself as superior to the citizenry , when it no longer operates for the benefit of the people , when the people are no longer able to peacefully @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cease to act like public servants , when elected officials no longer represent the will of the people , when the government routinely violates the rights of the people and perpetrates more violence against the citizenry than the criminal class , when government spending is unaccountable and unaccounted for , when the judiciary act as courts of order rather than justice , and when the government is no longer bound by the laws of the Constitution , then you no longer have a government “ of the people , by the people and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a government of wolves .
Our backs are against the proverbial wall .
The government and its cohorts have conspired to ensure that the only real recourse the American people have to express their displeasure with the government is through voting , which is no real recourse at all .
The penalties for civil disobedience , whistleblowing and rebellion are severe .
If you refuse to pay taxes for government programs you believe to be immoral or illegal , you will go to jail .
If you attempt to overthrow the government—or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ overstepped its reach , you will go to jail .
If you attempt to blow the whistle on government misconduct , there ’ s a pretty good chance you will go to jail .
For too long , the American people have obeyed the government ’ s dictates , no matter now extreme .
We have paid its taxes , penalties and fines , no matter how outrageous .
We have tolerated its indignities , insults and abuses , no matter how egregious .
We have turned a blind eye to its indiscretions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We have held our silence in the face of its lawlessness , licentiousness and corruption , no matter how illicit .
How long we will continue to suffer depends on how much we ’ re willing to give up for the sake of freedom .
America ’ s founders provided us with a very specific explanation about the purpose of government and a roadmap for what to do when the government abuses its authority , ignores our objections , and establishes itself as a tyrant .
We must choose between peaceful slavery @ @ @ @ @ @ @ status quo in servitude to the police state ) and dangerous freedom .
That will mean carving out a path in which we begin to take ownership of our government , starting at the local level , challenging the status quo , and raising hell—nonviolently—whenever a government official steps out of line .
We can no longer maintain the illusion of freedom .
As I make clear in my book Battlefield America : The War on the American People , we are at our most vulnerable right now .

“When it gets down to having to use violence, then you are playing the system’s game. The establishment will irritate you—pull your beard, flick your face—to make you fight. Because once they’ve got you violent, then they know how to handle you.”—John Lennon
Brace yourselves.
There is something being concocted in the dens of power, far beyond the public eye, and it doesn’t bode well for the future of this country.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Anytime you have an entire nation so mesmerized by political theater and public spectacle that they are oblivious to all else, you’d better beware.
Anytime you have a government that operates in the shadows, speaks in a language of force, and rules by fiat, you’d better beware.
And anytime you have a government so far removed from its people as to ensure that they are never seen, heard or heeded by those elected to represent them, you’d better beware.
What is unfolding before us is not a revolution.
The looting, the burning, the rioting, the violence: this is an anti-revolution.
The protesters are playing right into the government’s hands, because the powers-that-be want this. They want an excuse to lockdown the nation and throw the switch to all-out martial law. They want a reason to make the police state stronger.
It’s happening faster than we can keep up.
The Justice Department is deploying federal prison riot teams to various cities. More than half of the nation’s governors are calling on the National Guard to quell civil unrest. Growing numbers of cities, having just barely emerged from a coronavirus lockdown, are once again being locked down, this time in response to the growing upheaval.
This is how it begins.
It’s that dystopian 2030 Pentagon training video all over again, which anticipates the need for the government to institute martial law (use armed forces to solve domestic political and social problems) in order to navigate a world bedeviled by “criminal networks,” “substandard infrastructure,” “religious and ethnic tensions,” “impoverishment, slums,” “open landfills, over-burdened sewers,” a “growing mass of unemployed,” and an urban landscape in which the prosperous economic elite must be protected from the impoverishment of the have nots.
We’re way ahead of schedule.
The architects of the police state have us exactly where they want us: under their stamping boot, gasping for breath, desperate for freedom, grappling for some semblance of a future that does not resemble the totalitarian prison being erected around us.
This way lies certain tyranny.
For just one fleeting moment, “we the people” seemed united in our outrage over this latest killing of an unarmed man by a cop hyped up on his own authority and the power of his uniform.
You Might Like
That unity didn’t last.
Indeed, it didn’t take long—no surprise there—for us to quickly become divided again, polarized by the misguided fury and senseless violence of mobs taking to the streets, reeking of madness and mayhem.
Deliberately or not, the rioters have directed our attention away from the government’s crimes and onto their own.
This is a distraction.
Don’t allow yourself to be so distracted.
Let’s not lose sight of what started all of this in the first place: the U.S. government.
More than terrorism, more than domestic extremism, more than gun violence and organized crime, the systemic violence being perpetrated by agents of the government constitutes a greater menace to the life, liberty and property of its citizens than any of the so-called dangers from which the government claims to protect us.
Case in point: George Floyd died at the hands of the American police state.
The callous, cold-blooded murder of the unarmed, 46-year-old black man by police is nothing new: for 8 minutes and 46 seconds, police knelt on Floyd’s neck while the man pleaded for his life, struggled to breathe, cried out for his dead mother, and finally passed out and died.
Floyd is yet another victim of a broken system of policing that has placed “we the people” at the mercy of militarized cops who have almost absolute discretion to decide who is a threat, what constitutes resistance, and how harshly they can deal with the citizens they were appointed to “serve and protect.”
Daily, Americans are being shot, stripped, searched, choked, beaten and tasered by police for little more than daring to frown, smile, question, challenge an order or just exist.
I’m talking about the growing numbers of unarmed people are who being shot and killed for just standing a certain way, or moving a certain way, or holding something—anything—that police could misinterpret to be a gun, or igniting some trigger-centric fear in a police officer’s mind that has nothing to do with an actual threat to their safety.
Killed by police for standing in a “shooting stance.” Killed for holding a cell phone. Killed for holding a baseball bat. Killed for opening the front door. Killed for being a child in a car pursued by police. Killed for approaching police while holding a metal spoon. Killed for running in an aggressive manner while holding a tree branch. Killed for crawling around naked. Killed for hunching over in a defensive posture. Killed because a police officer accidentally fired his gun instead of his taser. Killed for wearing dark pants and a basketball jersey. Killed for reaching for his license and registration during a traffic stop. Killed for driving while deaf. Killed for being homeless. Killed for brandishing a shoehorn. Killed for peeing outdoors. Killed for having his car break down on the road. Killed for holding a garden hose.
Now you can make all kinds of excuses to justify these shootings, and in fact that’s exactly what you’ll hear from politicians, police unions, law enforcement officials and individuals who are more than happy to march in lockstep with the police. However, as these incidents make clear, the only truly compliant, submissive and obedient citizen in a police state is a dead one.
Sad, isn’t it, how quickly we have gone from a nation of laws—where the least among us had just as much right to be treated with dignity and respect as the next person (in principle, at least)—to a nation of law enforcers (revenue collectors with weapons) who treat us all like suspects and criminals?
This is not how you keep the peace.
This is not justice. This is not even law and order.
This is certainly not freedom. This is the illusion of freedom.
Unfortunately, we are now being ruled by a government of psychopaths, scoundrels, spies, thugs, thieves, gangsters, ruffians, rapists, extortionists, bounty hunters, battle-ready warriors and cold-blooded killers who communicate using a language of force and oppression.
The facts speak for themselves.
We’re being ravaged by a government of ruffians, rapists and killers. It’s not just the police shootings of unarmed citizens that are worrisome. It’s the SWAT team raids gone wrong that are leaving innocent citizens wounded, children terrorized and family pets killed. It’s the roadside strip searches—in some cases, cavity searches of men and women alike carried out in full view of the public—in pursuit of drugs that are never found. It’s the potentially lethal—and unwarranted—use of so-called “nonlethal” weapons such as tasers on children for “mouthing off to a police officer. For trying to run from the principal’s office. For, at the age of 12, getting into a fight with another girl.”
We’re being held at gunpoint by a government of soldiers—a standing army. While Americans are being made to jump through an increasing number of hoops in order to exercise their Second Amendment right to own a gun, the government is arming its own civilian employees to the hilt with guns, ammunition and military-style equipment, authorizing them to make arrests, and training them in military tactics. Among the agencies being supplied with night-vision equipment, body armor, hollow-point bullets, shotguns, drones, assault rifles and LP gas cannons are the Smithsonian, U.S. Mint, Health and Human Services, IRS, FDA, Small Business Administration, Social Security Administration, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Education Department, Energy Department, Bureau of Engraving and Printing and an assortment of public universities. There are now reportedly more bureaucratic (non-military) government civilians armed with high-tech, deadly weapons than U.S. Marines. That doesn’t even begin to touch on the government’s arsenal, the transformation of local police into extensions of the military, and the speed with which the nation could be locked down under martial law depending on the circumstances. Clearly, the government is preparing for war—and a civil war, at that—and “we the people” are the perceived enemy.
We’re being taken advantage of by a government of scoundrels, idiots and cowards. American satirist H.L. Mencken calculated that “Congress consists of one-third, more or less, scoundrels; two-thirds, more or less, idiots; and three-thirds, more or less, poltroons.” By and large, Americans seem to agree. When you’ve got government representatives who spend a large chunk of their work hours fundraising, being feted by lobbyists, shuffling through a lucrative revolving door between public service and lobbying, and making themselves available to anyone with enough money to secure access to a congressional office, you’re in the clutches of a corrupt oligarchy. Mind you, these same elected officials rarely read the legislation they’re enacting, nor do they seem capable of enacting much legislation that actually helps rather than hinders the plight of the American citizen.
We’re being locked up by a government of greedy jailers. We have become a carceral state, spending three times more on our prisons than on our schools and imprisoning close to a quarter of the world’s prisoners, despite the fact that crime is at an all-time low and the U.S. makes up only 5% of the world’s population. The rise of overcriminalization and profit-driven private prisons provides even greater incentives for locking up American citizens for such non-violent “crimes” as having an overgrown lawn. As the Boston Review points out, “America’s contemporary system of policing, courts, imprisonment, and parole … makes money through asset forfeiture, lucrative public contracts from private service providers, and by directly extracting revenue and unpaid labor from populations of color and the poor. In states and municipalities throughout the country, the criminal justice system defrays costs by forcing prisoners and their families to pay for punishment. It also allows private service providers to charge outrageous fees for everyday needs such as telephone calls. As a result people facing even minor criminal charges can easily find themselves trapped in a self-perpetuating cycle of debt, criminalization, and incarceration.”
We’re being spied on by a government of Peeping Toms. The government, aided by its corporate allies, is watching everything you do, reading everything you write, listening to everything you say, and monitoring everything you spend. Omnipresent surveillance is paving the way for government programs that profile citizens, document their behavior and attempt to predict what they might do in the future, whether it’s what they might buy, what politician they might support, or what kinds of crimes they might commit. The impact of this far-reaching surveillance, according to Psychology Today, is “reduced trust, increased conformity, and even diminished civic participation.” As technology analyst Jillian C. York concludes, “Mass surveillance without due process—whether undertaken by the government of Bahrain, Russia, the US, or anywhere in between—threatens to stifle and smother that dissent, leaving in its wake a populace cowed by fear.”
We’re being forced to surrender our freedoms—and those of our children—to a government of extortionists, money launderers and professional pirates. The American people have been repeatedly sold a bill of goods about how the government needs more money, more expansive powers, and more secrecy (secret courts, secret budgets, secret military campaigns, secret surveillance) in order to keep us safe. Under the guise of fighting its wars on terror, drugs, domestic extremism, pandemics and civil unrest, the government has spent billions in taxpayer dollars on endless wars that have sown the seeds of blowback, surveillance programs that have subjected all Americans to a surveillance society, and militarized police that have turned communities into warzones.
We’re being robbed blind by a government of thieves. Americans no longer have any real protection against government agents empowered to seize private property at will. For instance, police agencies under the guise of asset forfeiture laws are taking property based on little more than a suspicion of criminal activity.
And we’re being forced to live in a perpetual state of emergency. From 9/11 through the COVID-19 lockdowns and now the threat of martial law in the face of growing civil unrest, we have witnessed the rise of an “emergency state” that justifies all manner of government tyranny and power grabs in the so-called name of national security.
Whatever else it may be—a danger, a menace, a threat—the U.S. government is certainly not looking out for our best interests, nor is it in any way a friend to freedom.
When the government views itself as superior to the citizenry, when it no longer operates for the benefit of the people, when the people are no longer able to peacefully reform their government, when government officials cease to act like public servants, when elected officials no longer represent the will of the people, when the government routinely violates the rights of the people and perpetrates more violence against the citizenry than the criminal class, when government spending is unaccountable and unaccounted for, when the judiciary act as courts of order rather than justice, and when the government is no longer bound by the laws of the Constitution, then you no longer have a government “of the people, by the people and for the people.”
What we have is a government of wolves.
Our backs are against the proverbial wall.
The government and its cohorts have conspired to ensure that the only real recourse the American people have to express their displeasure with the government is through voting, which is no real recourse at all.
The penalties for civil disobedience, whistleblowing and rebellion are severe. If you refuse to pay taxes for government programs you believe to be immoral or illegal, you will go to jail. If you attempt to overthrow the government—or any agency thereof—because you believe it has overstepped its reach, you will go to jail. If you attempt to blow the whistle on government misconduct, there’s a pretty good chance you will go to jail.
For too long, the American people have obeyed the government’s dictates, no matter now extreme. We have paid its taxes, penalties and fines, no matter how outrageous. We have tolerated its indignities, insults and abuses, no matter how egregious. We have turned a blind eye to its indiscretions and incompetence, no matter how imprudent. We have held our silence in the face of its lawlessness, licentiousness and corruption, no matter how illicit.
We have suffered.
How long we will continue to suffer depends on how much we’re willing to give up for the sake of freedom.
America’s founders provided us with a very specific explanation about the purpose of government and a roadmap for what to do when the government abuses its authority, ignores our objections, and establishes itself as a tyrant.
We must choose between peaceful slavery (in other words, maintaining the status quo in servitude to the police state) and dangerous freedom. That will mean carving out a path in which we begin to take ownership of our government, starting at the local level, challenging the status quo, and raising hell—nonviolently—whenever a government official steps out of line.
We can no longer maintain the illusion of freedom.
As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, we are at our most vulnerable right now.


thedcclothesline--2020-06-08--Rand Paul: Slapping Someone Could Get You 10 Years In Prison Under Federal ‘Anti-Lynching’ Bill

Democratic Senators Kamala Harris and Cory Booker ’ s Orwellian “ anti-lynching bill ” will allow the feds to throw Americans in prison for 10 years for slapping someone and uttering a racial slur , Senator Rand Paul revealed Thursday .
The bill , which Cory Booker said last year was inspired by Jussie Smollett ’ s supposed “ lynching , ” does not make lynching illegal as it ’ s already illegal but instead creates a new crime called “ conspiracy to lynch ” that will allow the feds to ramp up mass incarceration for thought crimes .
Senator @ @ @ @ @ @ @ atrocious bill up as the GOP-controlled senate is too cowardly to stand against it , lest they be perceived as “ pro-lynching.
” take our poll - story continues below I think it ’ s important to know and to let the record show that I ’ ve been working with Senator Booker ’ s office for three months on the amendment to this bill that I ’ m willing to have unanimous passage of the bill today , but I think it ’ s incredibly important that we get this right .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ black woman in New Jersey , assaulted three Jewish women and slapped them .
It was terrible and she uttered racial epithets about these Jewish women .
She was charged with third degree misdemeanor assault up to a year in prison , which actually sounds to me pretty significant for slapping , but she was then charged with a hate crime in addition to that that would be four years in addition .
So we do have to get this right .
If slapping someone and hurling a racial epithet could get you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exactly what we ’ ve been fighting about in criminal justice reform , that we set up a system , we didn ’ t pay attention to the penalties , and all of a sudden , things we didn ’ t intend happen .
So we have to be smart about this .
I ’ m willing to pass the bill today , as amended , which would simply say not that you even have to harm someone , you have to attempt to harm them , but it has to be an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the discussion about bruising while trying to lynch someone , yes that ’ s attempted murder , it would be covered by this bill .
Nothing in the bill would stop , would prevent the prosecution of heinous behavior .
That ’ s what it ’ s intended for .
What I ’ m intending is … What I ’ m trying to do is to make sure we don ’ t get unintended consequences .
We ’ ve fought the battle against mandatory minimums for a decade now because we tie @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sense .
10 years for slapping someone would be an abomination and it couldn ’ t happen to anyone .
Do we want a black woman who slapped three Jewish women in New Jersey to get 10 years in prison ?
If there was a group of them , it ’ s now a conspiracy to lynch .
We have to use some common sense here .
We should not have a 10-year prison sentence for anything less than at the very least an attempt to do bodily harm .
The statute lists @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could still be an attempt , it doesn ’ t mean you actually have to have it , but what it would preclude is somebody shoves somebody in a bar and they fall down and they have an abrasion and they say he did it because of a racial animus towards me , and you have a 10-year penalty , that ’ s not right .
So all of us here are advocates on the same side of criminal justice reform , we all have argued on the same side that the law @ @ @ @ @ @ @ too many people unfairly .
That ’ s what I ’ m trying to prevent here , and so the thing is is I understand the emotions on it .
You think I take great joy in being here ?
No .
I ’ m a sponsor of 22 criminal justice bills .
You think I ’ m getting any good publicity out of this ?
No , I will be excoriated by simple-minded people on the internet who think somehow I don ’ t like Emmett Till or appreciate the history and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ ll be lectured to by everybody and I ’ ve got no right … in the memory of Emmett Till .
I ’ ll be lectured to by everybody .
I ’ ve got no right to have an opinion on any of these things .
I should be quiet .
But we can ’ t just not read our bills .
You know , I have worked in an honest way with Senator Booker ’ s office for three months on this bill .
We have gone back and forth .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ came back to us and said it wouldn ’ t work .
And I said , “ Well , what about this ?
” And then we haven ’ t gotten any more responses .
So we haven ’ t gotten responses back in a month or more , and the thing is , is now they ’ re litigating in the press and trying to accuse me of somehow being in favor of something so heinous that it makes my skin crawl , that it makes me sick to my stomach to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But we also ought to be fair and honest about this .
Lynching is illegal .
People who are saying there ’ s no federal law against lynching or not telling the truth .
The law says , if you kill somebody and you have racial animus under the Hate Crime statute , it is illegal .
You can ’ t do that .
It ’ s also illegal in all the states .
This bill does not make lynching illegal .
So for all the discussion of that , this bill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lynch .
Well , yeah , I ’ m for it .
If there ’ s a crowd , let ’ s arrest of the whole mob .
All four policemen should be responsible for what happened to Mr. Floyd .
But the thing is , is when we do that , we have to be careful that we don ’ t then put a crowd of people in where someone pushed into someone or someone slapped someone .
There has to be justice .
People are chanting justice .
Justice has to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vision and can ’ t be hamstrung into something that could give someone 10 years in prison for a minor crime .
This is a very minor attempt .
Everything we left in here , we have worked with Senator Booker ’ s office to make sure it is inclusive .
They came back and said , “ What about attempted ?
” And we said , “ Let ’ s change the language.
” So we have in there , “ attempt to cause seriously bodily harm.
” So there could be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to have a discussion of whether there was an attempt and it was an attempt that looked like it would be serious .
So I think slapping someone isn ’ t , but under the current statute , as is , people will say , “ Oh , nobody will ever do it.
” Maybe , but we ’ re putting it on the books .
The mandatory minimums have kept people in jail for decades .
There are people in life for nonviolent crimes .
All of us have worked on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ m asking for a very minor change .
I ’ ll pass it right now .
I ’ m completely out of the way .
I ’ m for the bill .
I ’ m asking unanimous consent to pass a bill today with one amendment that just says , let ’ s be careful not to arrest people for slapping someone or not to arrest somebody for pushes into someone and get them 10 years in prison .
This isn ’ t about someone trying to kill another person or someone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be included in this language , even if they did not have a mark on the person , but if they were rounding them up , tying them up , and they ’ d thrown a rope over the tree , that ’ s attempted murder .
And they would still be included under this bill , even without a mark on them .
But what we have to preclude and what we ’ re trying to preclude is that the bill doesn ’ t get used for the wrong purposes .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about who we want to punish and who we should prevent .
And we ’ re also on the same side on the symbolism of this , but we can ’ t pass laws that do exactly what all of us have said is wrong with our penal system , all the unintended consequences .
There is one here and I ask in a very polite way , and I ’ ve been asking for three months for one small change , and I would let the bill go today , on this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
And the changes have been out there .
They ’ re not brand new and they ’ ve been in Senator Booker ’ s office for three months and we ’ ve tried to , as he ’ s had objections , work with him on his objections .
So I would ask unanimous consent , once again , to pass the bill as amended .
Democrats are releasing almost everyone arrested for taking part in the riots and looting over the past two weeks but they want the feds to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a decade or more for the most minor slight if their actions were motivated by any alleged racial bias .
Meanwhile , Republicans — with the sole exception of Rand Paul — are not only doing nothing to stop it but are eager to sign on to this lunacy !
Contact your senator and tell them you stand with Rand !
• The Epstein Effect ?
Rand Paul ’ s Relevant Impeachment Question Disallowed by Chief Justice John Roberts .
Has The Chief Justice Been Compromised ?
• Senator Rand Paul Hijacks Republican @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Role in 9/11 • Sen. Rand Paul Humiliates CBS News Hacks On Their Own Show , Praises Trump For Seeking Peace • Kentucky senator Rand Paul says “ deep state ” is real – there ARE intelligence officials acting WITHOUT authorization

Democratic Senators Kamala Harris and Cory Booker’s Orwellian “anti-lynching bill” will allow the feds to throw Americans in prison for 10 years for slapping someone and uttering a racial slur, Senator Rand Paul revealed Thursday.
The bill, which Cory Booker said last year was inspired by Jussie Smollett’s supposed “lynching,” does not make lynching illegal as it’s already illegal but instead creates a new crime called “conspiracy to lynch” that will allow the feds to ramp up mass incarceration for thought crimes.
Senator Paul is “single-handedly” holding this atrocious bill up as the GOP-controlled senate is too cowardly to stand against it, lest they be perceived as “pro-lynching.”
Hey @CoryBooker and @KamalaHarris lynching is already illegal but slapping someone is not lynching, We shouldn't conflate someone who has an altercation with minor injuries, with lynching, That's my opposition to this without my amendment to fix it. https://t.co/vmyuk55Dcc take our poll - story continues below Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. — Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) June 5, 2020
Rush transcript:
I think it’s important to know and to let the record show that I’ve been working with Senator Booker’s office for three months on the amendment to this bill that I’m willing to have unanimous passage of the bill today, but I think it’s incredibly important that we get this right. A woman in New Jersey, a black woman in New Jersey, assaulted three Jewish women and slapped them. It was terrible and she uttered racial epithets about these Jewish women. She was charged with third degree misdemeanor assault up to a year in prison, which actually sounds to me pretty significant for slapping, but she was then charged with a hate crime in addition to that that would be four years in addition. So we do have to get this right. If slapping someone and hurling a racial epithet could get you 10 years in prison, this is exactly what we’ve been fighting about in criminal justice reform, that we set up a system, we didn’t pay attention to the penalties, and all of a sudden, things we didn’t intend happen. So we have to be smart about this. I’m willing to pass the bill today, as amended, which would simply say not that you even have to harm someone, you have to attempt to harm them, but it has to be an attempt to harm them.
So all of the discussion about bruising while trying to lynch someone, yes that’s attempted murder, it would be covered by this bill. Nothing in the bill would stop, would prevent the prosecution of heinous behavior. That’s what it’s intended for. What I’m intending is … What I’m trying to do is to make sure we don’t get unintended consequences. We’ve fought the battle against mandatory minimums for a decade now because we tie up people in sentencing that makes no sense. 10 years for slapping someone would be an abomination and it couldn’t happen to anyone. Do we want a black woman who slapped three Jewish women in New Jersey to get 10 years in prison? If there was a group of them, it’s now a conspiracy to lynch. We have to use some common sense here. We should not have a 10-year prison sentence for anything less than at the very least an attempt to do bodily harm. The statute lists what bodily harm is, but it could still be an attempt, it doesn’t mean you actually have to have it, but what it would preclude is somebody shoves somebody in a bar and they fall down and they have an abrasion and they say he did it because of a racial animus towards me, and you have a 10-year penalty, that’s not right.
So all of us here are advocates on the same side of criminal justice reform, we all have argued on the same side that the law is screwed up, and has incarcerated too many people unfairly. That’s what I’m trying to prevent here, and so the thing is is I understand the emotions on it. You think I take great joy in being here? No. I’m a sponsor of 22 criminal justice bills. You think I’m getting any good publicity out of this? No, I will be excoriated by simple-minded people on the internet who think somehow I don’t like Emmett Till or appreciate the history and the memory of Emmett Till. I’ll be lectured to by everybody and I’ve got no right
… in the memory of Emmett Till. I’ll be lectured to by everybody. I’ve got no right to have an opinion on any of these things. I should be quiet. But we can’t just not read our bills. You know, I have worked in an honest way with Senator Booker’s office for three months on this bill. We have gone back and forth. We gave them some language. They came back to us and said it wouldn’t work. And I said, “Well, what about this?” And then we haven’t gotten any more responses.
So we haven’t gotten responses back in a month or more, and the thing is, is now they’re litigating in the press and trying to accuse me of somehow being in favor of something so heinous that it makes my skin crawl, that it makes me sick to my stomach to even read the accounts of what happened.
But we also ought to be fair and honest about this. Lynching is illegal. People who are saying there’s no federal law against lynching or not telling the truth. The law says, if you kill somebody and you have racial animus under the Hate Crime statute, it is illegal. You can’t do that. It’s also illegal in all the states. This bill does not make lynching illegal. So for all the discussion of that, this bill creates a new crime called conspiracy to lynch. Well, yeah, I’m for it. If there’s a crowd, let’s arrest of the whole mob. All four policemen should be responsible for what happened to Mr. Floyd.
But the thing is, is when we do that, we have to be careful that we don’t then put a crowd of people in where someone pushed into someone or someone slapped someone. There has to be justice. People are chanting justice. Justice has to have a brain and has to have vision and can’t be hamstrung into something that could give someone 10 years in prison for a minor crime.
This is a very minor attempt. Everything we left in here, we have worked with Senator Booker’s office to make sure it is inclusive. They came back and said, “What about attempted?” And we said, “Let’s change the language.” So we have in there, “attempt to cause seriously bodily harm.” So there could be no injury, but someone will have to have a discussion of whether there was an attempt and it was an attempt that looked like it would be serious.
So I think slapping someone isn’t, but under the current statute, as is, people will say, “Oh, nobody will ever do it.” Maybe, but we’re putting it on the books. The mandatory minimums have kept people in jail for decades. There are people in life for nonviolent crimes. All of us have worked on the same side of that issue.
I’m asking for a very minor change. I’ll pass it right now. I’m completely out of the way. I’m for the bill. I’m asking unanimous consent to pass a bill today with one amendment that just says, let’s be careful not to arrest people for slapping someone or not to arrest somebody for pushes into someone and get them 10 years in prison.
This isn’t about someone trying to kill another person or someone attempting bodily harm. Those people would be included in this language, even if they did not have a mark on the person, but if they were rounding them up, tying them up, and they’d thrown a rope over the tree, that’s attempted murder. And they would still be included under this bill, even without a mark on them.
You Might Like
But what we have to preclude and what we’re trying to preclude is that the bill doesn’t get used for the wrong purposes. We’re all on the same side about who we want to punish and who we should prevent. And we’re also on the same side on the symbolism of this, but we can’t pass laws that do exactly what all of us have said is wrong with our penal system, all the unintended consequences.
There is one here and I ask in a very polite way, and I’ve been asking for three months for one small change, and I would let the bill go today, on this day, if we could have it. And the changes have been out there. They’re not brand new and they’ve been in Senator Booker’s office for three months and we’ve tried to, as he’s had objections, work with him on his objections. So I would ask unanimous consent, once again, to pass the bill as amended.
Democrats are releasing almost everyone arrested for taking part in the riots and looting over the past two weeks but they want the feds to be able to throw anyone in prison for a decade or more for the most minor slight if their actions were motivated by any alleged racial bias.
Meanwhile, Republicans — with the sole exception of Rand Paul — are not only doing nothing to stop it but are eager to sign on to this lunacy!
Contact your senator and tell them you stand with Rand!
Follow InformationLiberation on Twitter, Facebook, Gab and Minds.
Rand Paul


thedcclothesline--2020-06-08--Veto-proof majority of Minneapolis City Council vows to disband police department

A vote for the Democrats in November is a vote for this insanity to spread nationally .
America is quite literally on the line this November .
take our poll - story continues below Nine members of the Minneapolis City Council — a veto-proof majority on the panel of 13 — signed a pledge at a rally on Sunday to begin the process of dismantling the Minneapolis Police Department as it currently exists , The Appeal first reported .
Why it matters : The move to replace the police department with a community-based public safety model answers the calls of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ massive overhaul of law enforcement in Minneapolis after the killing of George Floyd .
• Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey was berated and told to “ go home ” at a protest on Saturday after refusing to commit to defunding the police department .
• Council members said on Sunday that they had not yet fleshed out specific plans for what the new public safety system will look like , but said they would commit to working with the community and draw on past studies and policing reforms around the world for guidance , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ We ’ re here because we hear you .
We are here today because George Floyd was killed by the Minneapolis Police .
We are here because here in Minneapolis and in cities across the United States it is clear that our existing system of policing and public safety is not keeping our communities safe .
Our efforts at incremental reform have failed .
Period.
” • From 87 % White in 1980 to 60 % White in 2020 : Minneapolis City Council Vote to Disband Police Department Because of “ Racism ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Floyd ’ s Murder Was Hired Despite Having A Criminal Record With 7 Convictions • After Massive Uprising , City Council Members Look to Entirely Disband Minneapolis PD • Minneapolis Mayor Wants $ 55 Million Of Your Money To Repair Riot Damages That He Could Have Helped Stop

A vote for the Democrats in November is a vote for this insanity to spread nationally. America is quite literally on the line this November.
Every official in Minnesota with influence over the police & decision to keep Derek Chauvin on the force despite his alarming record is a Democrat: governor, attorney general, congresswoman and mayor. The city council consists of 12 Democrats and a Green Party member. 1/2 — Geller Report (@PamelaGeller) June 6, 2020
The Democrat Party is the “system” that protected the bad cop and led to George Floyd’s death. 2/2https://t.co/8fyYHN63Bc take our poll - story continues below Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. — Geller Report (@PamelaGeller) June 6, 2020
https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/1269750641037053953?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1269750641037053953&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgellerreport.com%2F2020%2F06%2Fveto-proof-majority-of-minneapolis-city-council-vows-to-disband-police-department.html%2F
Veto-proof majority of Minneapolis City Council vows to disband police department
By Axios, June 7, 2020
Nine members of the Minneapolis City Council — a veto-proof majority on the panel of 13 — signed a pledge at a rally on Sunday to begin the process of dismantling the Minneapolis Police Department as it currently exists, The Appeal first reported.
Why it matters: The move to replace the police department with a community-based public safety model answers the calls of activists who have been pushing for a massive overhaul of law enforcement in Minneapolis after the killing of George Floyd.
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey was berated and told to “go home” at a protest on Saturday after refusing to commit to defunding the police department.
Council members said on Sunday that they had not yet fleshed out specific plans for what the new public safety system will look like, but said they would commit to working with the community and draw on past studies and policing reforms around the world for guidance, the New York Times reports.
What they’re saying:
“We’re here because we hear you. We are here today because George Floyd was killed by the Minneapolis Police. We are here because here in Minneapolis and in cities across the United States it is clear that our existing system of policing and public safety is not keeping our communities safe. Our efforts at incremental reform have failed. Period.”
— Minneapolis City Council President Lisa Bender
Go deeper: Black Lives Matter co-founder explains “Defund the police” slogan
Courtesy of The Geller Report
Minneapolis


thedcclothesline--2020-06-09--BUSTED: Actors caught posing as cops in George Floyd rioting psy-op

( Natural News ) An alleged “ sheriff ’ s deputy ” who announced on Twitter the other day that he was throwing in the towel against law enforcement and joining the “ protesters ” has been outed as a fake .
@ Navyvetbolt81 , as this user calls himself or herself , tweeted a photo of what appears to be police gear complete with a gun , a walkie-talkie , and other apparel .
In the caption , this user wrote : “ I came home , threw my riot gear off in the middle of my living aftet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( sic ) be ordered to kill democracy .
I resigned this morning .
Im ( sic ) too stunned and ashamed to touch it .
I just witnessed another murder on tv .
The murder of democracy.
” The post garnered hundreds of thousands of likes and retweets and even reached the front page of Reddit before the same user account suddenly went on an anti-Trump tirade complete with the usual left-wing talking points .
This sparked controversy from many , including those in law enforcement themselves who called into question the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ poll - story continues below Since everything pictured in the photo can be purchased from websites like eBay and Alibaba , there is no way to prove that any of it was department-issued .
Further , the gun holster shown does not appear to be the type commonly used by law enforcement agencies , but rather a civilian holster available to anyone .
A firearms enthusiast who goes by the handle of @ LouisvilleGun uploaded a detailed analysis of everything wrong with the photo in question .
This user also made a rational @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be a left-wing hoax to make it appear as though law enforcement officers are suddenly siding with Antifa and Black Lives Matter .
Listen below to The Health Ranger Report as Mike Adams , the Health Ranger , talks about the controversy over law enforcement and reveals why people should not rely solely on police to protect them during a crisis : How are so many people unable to recognize these lies for what they are ?
As of this writing , @ Navyvetbolt81 has yet to provide any evidence to back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to work in law enforcement .
This user did , however , post an additional picture that even further points to the claims made being fraudulent .
In this more detailed photo , a sheriff ’ s vest and various weapons are seen , including a supposed department-issued Smith and Wesson M & P15 .
This particular firearm is considered to be an “ affordable ” type that retails for around $ 600 .
Along with this photo , @ Navyvetbolt81 claimed that this rifle was converted into a fully automatic weapon , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can obtain fully automatic rifles that civilians can not , and directly from military-grade manufacturers .
They would never convert a civilian firearm into a law enforcement firearm themselves , in other words .
Combine this with the fact that a department-issued fully automatic weapon would surely have to be returned in the event that an officer quit and the whole story stinks to high heaven .
If @ Navyvetbolt81 was really a law enforcement official , he or she would have had to return this weapon , or otherwise be in violation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Firearms , and Explosives ’ ( ATF ) tax stamp rules for the transfer of fully automatic firearms .
This is “ [ a ] lmost certainly a poorly disguised hoaxster , unwilling to provide any real evidence of his claims of affiliation with a law enforcement agency , using a sheriff ’ s badge purchased on eBay or Alibaba in order to advance a left-wing political agenda , ” warns Richard Moorhead from Big League Politics .
To keep up with the latest news about the Marxist uprising against our constitutional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CivilWar.news .

(Natural News) An alleged “sheriff’s deputy” who announced on Twitter the other day that he was throwing in the towel against law enforcement and joining the “protesters” has been outed as a fake.
@Navyvetbolt81, as this user calls himself or herself, tweeted a photo of what appears to be police gear complete with a gun, a walkie-talkie, and other apparel. In the caption, this user wrote:
“I came home, threw my riot gear off in the middle of my living aftet (sic) the last night id (sic) be ordered to kill democracy. I resigned this morning. Im (sic) too stunned and ashamed to touch it. I just witnessed another murder on tv. The murder of democracy.”
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The post garnered hundreds of thousands of likes and retweets and even reached the front page of Reddit before the same user account suddenly went on an anti-Trump tirade complete with the usual left-wing talking points. This sparked controversy from many, including those in law enforcement themselves who called into question the legitimacy of the tweet.
Since everything pictured in the photo can be purchased from websites like eBay and Alibaba, there is no way to prove that any of it was department-issued. Further, the gun holster shown does not appear to be the type commonly used by law enforcement agencies, but rather a civilian holster available to anyone.
A firearms enthusiast who goes by the handle of @LouisvilleGun uploaded a detailed analysis of everything wrong with the photo in question. This user also made a rational case for why the whole thing appears to be a left-wing hoax to make it appear as though law enforcement officers are suddenly siding with Antifa and Black Lives Matter.
Listen below to The Health Ranger Report as Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, talks about the controversy over law enforcement and reveals why people should not rely solely on police to protect them during a crisis: