thedcclothesline--2020-12-26--WHO Deletes Naturally Acquired Immunity From Its Website

The Memory Hole work continues .
The World Health Organization , headed by a known Marxist with terrorist ties who isn ’ t even a medical doctor , has now begun the scrubbing of things it formally promoted due to the CONvid “ virus.
” • Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus : The World Health Organization ’ s Director-General Who Isn ’ t Even A Trained Medial Doctor • Belgian Doctors & Medical Professionals Pen Open Letter Calling For Investigation Into WHO ’ s Role In Faking COVID-19 Scamdemic • Must See : MIT Medical Doctor Exposes The Lies Of Government & @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Viruses In General ( Video ) • # AskTheExperts – Shemirani , Corbett , Madej & Kaufman – The Vaccine Rollout Has Begun , Here ’ s What You ’ re Not Being Told !
• # AskTheExperts – Doctors , Nurses & Health Care Professionals From Around The World : “ The COVID Vaccine Is Neither Safe Nor Effective ” ( Video ) • Apparently , Dr. Fauci Doesn ’ t Know Which Arm He Took The CONvid-1984 Vaccine In – But Video Indicates He ’ s Lying Jeffrey Tucker has the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Maybe you have some sense that something fishy is going on ?
Same .
If it ’ s not one thing , it ’ s another .
Coronavirus lived on surfaces until it didn ’ t .
Masks didn ’ t work until they did , then they did not .
There is asymptomatic transmission , except there isn ’ t .
Lockdowns work to control the virus except they do not .
All these people are sick without symptoms until , whoops , PCR tests are wildly inaccurate because they were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Everyone is in danger of the virus except they aren ’ t .
It spreads in schools except it doesn ’ t .
take our poll - story continues below On it goes .
Daily .
It ’ s no wonder that so many people have stopped believing anything that “ public health authorities ” say .
In combination with governors and other autocrats doing their bidding , they set out to take away freedom and human rights and expected us to thank them for saving our lives .
At some point this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 12 ) life began feeling like a dystopian novel of your choice .
Well , now I have another piece of evidence to add to the mile-high pile of fishy mess .
The World Health Organization , for reasons unknown , has suddenly changed its definition of a core conception of immunology : herd immunity .
Its discovery was one of the major achievements of 20th century science , gradually emerging in the 1920s and then becoming ever more refined throughout the 20th century .
Herd immunity is a fascinating observation that you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ probability theory , whichever you prefer .
( It is certainly not a “ strategy ” so ignore any media source that describes it that way . )
Herd immunity speaks directly , and with explanatory power , to the empirical observation that respiratory viruses are either widespread and mostly mild ( common cold ) or very severe and short-lived ( Ebola ) .
Why is this ?
The reason is that when a virus kills its host – that is , when a virus overtaxes the body ’ s ability to integrate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the virus does not spread to others .
The more this occurs , the less it spreads .
If the virus doesn ’ t kill its host , it can hop to others through all the usual means .
When you get a virus and fight it off , your immune system encodes that information in a way that builds immunity to it .
When it happens to enough people ( and each case is different so we can ’ t put a clear number on it , especially given so many cross @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quality and becomes endemic , which is to say predictable and manageable .
Each new generation incorporates that information through more exposure .
This is what one would call Virology/Immunology 101 .
It ’ s what you read in every textbook .
It ’ s been taught in 9th grade cell biology for probably 80 years .
Observing the operations of this evolutionary phenomenon is pretty wonderful because it increases one ’ s respect for the way in which human biology has adapted to the presence of pathogens without absolutely freaking out .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ in cell biology is a major reason why public health became so smart in the 20th century .
We kept calm .
We managed viruses with medical professionals : doctor/patient relationships .
We avoided the Medieval tendency to run around with hair on fire but rather used rationality and intelligence .
Even the New York Times recognizes that natural immunity is powerful with Covid-19 , which is not in the least bit surprising .
Until one day , this strange institution called the World Health Organization – once glorious because it was mainly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has suddenly decided to delete everything I just wrote from cell biology basics .
It has literally changed the science in a Soviet-like way .
It has removed with the delete key any mention of natural immunities from its website .
It has taken the additional step of actually mischaracterizing the structure and functioning of vaccines .
So that you will believe me , I will try to be as precise as possible .
Here is the website from June 9 , 2020 .
You can see it here on Archive.org .
You @ @ @ @ @ @ @ click on the question about herd immunity .
You see the following .
That ’ s pretty darn accurate overall .
Even the statement that the threshold is “ not yet clear ” is correct .
There are cross immunities to Covid from other coronaviruses and there is T cell memory that contributes to natural immunity .
Some estimates are as low as 10 % , which is a far cry from the modelled 70 % estimate of virus immunity that is standard within the pharmaceutical realm .
Real life is vastly more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ epidemiology .
The WHO ’ s past statement is a solid , if “ pop , ” description .
However , in a screenshot dated November 13 , 2020 , we read the following note that somehow pretends as if human beings do not have immune systems at all but rather rely entirely on big pharma to inject things into our blood .
What this note at the World Health Organization has done is deleted what amounts to the entire million-year history of humankind in its delicate dance with pathogens .
You could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us are nothing but blank and unimprovable slates on which the pharmaceutical industry writes its signature .
In effect , this change at WHO ignores and even wipes out 100 years of medical advances in virology , immunology , and epidemiology .
It is thoroughly unscientific – shilling for the vaccine industry in exactly the way the conspiracy theorists say that WHO has been doing since the beginning of this pandemic .
What ’ s even more strange is the claim that a vaccine protects people from a virus rather than exposing them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about this claim is that a vaccine works precisely by firing up the immune system through exposure .
Why I had to type those words is truly beyond me .
This has been known for centuries .
There is simply no way for medical science completely to replace the human immune system .
It can only game it via what used to be called inoculation .
Take from this what you will .
It is a sign of the times .
For nearly a full year , the media has been telling us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comply with their dictates that run contrary to every tenet of liberalism , every expectation we ’ ve developed in the modern world that we can live freely and with the certainty of rights .
Then “ science ” took over and our human rights were slammed .
And now the “ science ” is actually deleting its own history , airbrushing over what it used to know and replacing it with something misleading at best and patently false at worst .
I can not say why , exactly , the WHO did @ @ @ @ @ @ @ past nine or ten months , however , it is reasonable to assume that politics are at play .
Since the beginning of the pandemic , those who have been pushing lockdowns and hysteria over the coronavirus have resisted the idea of natural herd immunity , instead insisting that we must live in lockdown until a vaccine is developed .
That is why the Great Barrington Declaration , written by three of the world ’ s preeminent epidemiologists and which advocated embracing the phenomenon of herd immunity as a way of protecting the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was met with such venom .
Now we see the WHO , too , succumbing to political pressure .
This is the only rational explanation for changing the definition of herd immunity that has existed for the past century .
The science has not changed ; only the politics have .
And that is precisely why it is so dangerous and deadly to subject virus management to the forces of politics .
Eventually the science too bends to the duplicitous character of the political industry .
When the existing textbooks that students use @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the authorities during a crisis in which the ruling class is clearly attempting to seize permanent power , we ’ ve got a problem .
You see how they are doing it ?
It most definitely is a conspiracy , and for such conspiracies that have resulted in untold deaths , the penalty should be death for all involved , … and this doesn ’ t just include WHO .
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

The Memory Hole work continues. The World Health Organization, headed by a known Marxist with terrorist ties who isn’t even a medical doctor, has now begun the scrubbing of things it formally promoted due to the CONvid “virus.”
Jeffrey Tucker has the story at American Institute for Economic Research.
Maybe you have some sense that something fishy is going on? Same. If it’s not one thing, it’s another.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Coronavirus lived on surfaces until it didn’t. Masks didn’t work until they did, then they did not. There is asymptomatic transmission, except there isn’t. Lockdowns work to control the virus except they do not. All these people are sick without symptoms until, whoops, PCR tests are wildly inaccurate because they were never intended to be diagnostic tools. Everyone is in danger of the virus except they aren’t. It spreads in schools except it doesn’t.
On it goes. Daily. It’s no wonder that so many people have stopped believing anything that “public health authorities” say. In combination with governors and other autocrats doing their bidding, they set out to take away freedom and human rights and expected us to thank them for saving our lives. At some point this year (for me it was March 12) life began feeling like a dystopian novel of your choice.
Well, now I have another piece of evidence to add to the mile-high pile of fishy mess. The World Health Organization, for reasons unknown, has suddenly changed its definition of a core conception of immunology: herd immunity. Its discovery was one of the major achievements of 20th century science, gradually emerging in the 1920s and then becoming ever more refined throughout the 20th century.
Herd immunity is a fascinating observation that you can trace to biological reality or statistical probability theory, whichever you prefer. (It is certainly not a “strategy” so ignore any media source that describes it that way.) Herd immunity speaks directly, and with explanatory power, to the empirical observation that respiratory viruses are either widespread and mostly mild (common cold) or very severe and short-lived (Ebola).
Why is this? The reason is that when a virus kills its host – that is, when a virus overtaxes the body’s ability to integrate it, its host dies and so the virus does not spread to others. The more this occurs, the less it spreads. If the virus doesn’t kill its host, it can hop to others through all the usual means. When you get a virus and fight it off, your immune system encodes that information in a way that builds immunity to it. When it happens to enough people (and each case is different so we can’t put a clear number on it, especially given so many cross immunities) the virus loses its pandemic quality and becomes endemic, which is to say predictable and manageable. Each new generation incorporates that information through more exposure.
This is what one would call Virology/Immunology 101. It’s what you read in every textbook. It’s been taught in 9th grade cell biology for probably 80 years. Observing the operations of this evolutionary phenomenon is pretty wonderful because it increases one’s respect for the way in which human biology has adapted to the presence of pathogens without absolutely freaking out.
And the discovery of this fascinating dynamic in cell biology is a major reason why public health became so smart in the 20th century. We kept calm. We managed viruses with medical professionals: doctor/patient relationships. We avoided the Medieval tendency to run around with hair on fire but rather used rationality and intelligence. Even the New York Times recognizes that natural immunity is powerful with Covid-19, which is not in the least bit surprising.
Until one day, this strange institution called the World Health Organization – once glorious because it was mainly responsible for the eradication of smallpox – has suddenly decided to delete everything I just wrote from cell biology basics. It has literally changed the science in a Soviet-like way. It has removed with the delete key any mention of natural immunities from its website. It has taken the additional step of actually mischaracterizing the structure and functioning of vaccines.
So that you will believe me, I will try to be as precise as possible. Here is the website from June 9, 2020. You can see it here on Archive.org. You have to move down the page and click on the question about herd immunity. You see the following.
That’s pretty darn accurate overall. Even the statement that the threshold is “not yet clear” is correct. There are cross immunities to Covid from other coronaviruses and there is T cell memory that contributes to natural immunity.
Some estimates are as low as 10%, which is a far cry from the modelled 70% estimate of virus immunity that is standard within the pharmaceutical realm. Real life is vastly more complicated than models, in economics or epidemiology. The WHO’s past statement is a solid, if “pop,” description.
However, in a screenshot dated November 13, 2020, we read the following note that somehow pretends as if human beings do not have immune systems at all but rather rely entirely on big pharma to inject things into our blood.
What this note at the World Health Organization has done is deleted what amounts to the entire million-year history of humankind in its delicate dance with pathogens. You could only gather from this that all of us are nothing but blank and unimprovable slates on which the pharmaceutical industry writes its signature.
You Might Like
In effect, this change at WHO ignores and even wipes out 100 years of medical advances in virology, immunology, and epidemiology. It is thoroughly unscientific – shilling for the vaccine industry in exactly the way the conspiracy theorists say that WHO has been doing since the beginning of this pandemic.
What’s even more strange is the claim that a vaccine protects people from a virus rather than exposing them to it. What’s amazing about this claim is that a vaccine works precisely by firing up the immune system through exposure. Why I had to type those words is truly beyond me. This has been known for centuries. There is simply no way for medical science completely to replace the human immune system. It can only game it via what used to be called inoculation.
Take from this what you will. It is a sign of the times. For nearly a full year, the media has been telling us that “science” requires that we comply with their dictates that run contrary to every tenet of liberalism, every expectation we’ve developed in the modern world that we can live freely and with the certainty of rights. Then “science” took over and our human rights were slammed. And now the “science” is actually deleting its own history, airbrushing over what it used to know and replacing it with something misleading at best and patently false at worst.
I cannot say why, exactly, the WHO did this. Given the events of the past nine or ten months, however, it is reasonable to assume that politics are at play. Since the beginning of the pandemic, those who have been pushing lockdowns and hysteria over the coronavirus have resisted the idea of natural herd immunity, instead insisting that we must live in lockdown until a vaccine is developed.
That is why the Great Barrington Declaration, written by three of the world’s preeminent epidemiologists and which advocated embracing the phenomenon of herd immunity as a way of protecting the vulnerable and minimizing harms to society, was met with such venom. Now we see the WHO, too, succumbing to political pressure. This is the only rational explanation for changing the definition of herd immunity that has existed for the past century.
The science has not changed; only the politics have. And that is precisely why it is so dangerous and deadly to subject virus management to the forces of politics. Eventually the science too bends to the duplicitous character of the political industry.
When the existing textbooks that students use in college contradict the latest official pronouncements from the authorities during a crisis in which the ruling class is clearly attempting to seize permanent power, we’ve got a problem.
You see how they are doing it? It most definitely is a conspiracy, and for such conspiracies that have resulted in untold deaths, the penalty should be death for all involved,… and this doesn’t just include WHO.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thedcclothesline--2020-12-26--No plans to yield: Texas stands by claim that Biden win “statistically impossible”

( Natural News ) Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton defended a statistical analysis claiming that Democratic nominee Joe Biden ’ s victory was “ statistically impossible.
” Paxton stood by the analysis by economist Charles Cicchetti that said Biden had “ less than one in a quadrillion ” chance of winning in a clean election .
The attorney general ’ s defense of the claim on Dec. 11 followed his now-dismissed lawsuit against four battleground states .
According to the economist , it was statistically impossible for Biden to overcome President Donald Trump ’ s leads in four battleground states @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on a random population sample .
Paxton cited Cicchetti ’ s analysis in his election lawsuit against the states of Pennsylvania , Wisconsin , Michigan and Georgia .
The suit alleged that the four defendant states used the pandemic to push through changes to mail-in voting rules – in violation of the Constitution ’ s Electors Clause mandating only state legislatures decide on election rules .
Paxton commented on the criticism against Cicchetti , saying that these consist “ solely of ad hominem attacks.
” The attorney general further remarked that the economist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in the U.S. ’ s 50 largest urban areas “ reinforces the unusual statistical improbability of Biden ’ s vote totals ” in five urban areas in the defendant states .
take our poll - story continues below Seventeen Republican states backed the Texas attorney general ’ s lawsuit through a Dec. 9 amicus curiae brief .
Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich later filed his own brief bolstering Paxton ’ s complaint , while President Donald Trump himself sought permission to join the lawsuit against the four defendant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the high court rejected the complaint filed by the Lone Star State for “ lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution.
” The one-page U.S. Supreme Court decision ruled that Texas “ has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections.
” The defendant states slammed the now-dismissed election lawsuit filed by Paxton The four battleground states mentioned as defendants equally slammed the suit as ridiculous through filings from their attorneys general .
The Keystone State responded to the suit on Dec. 10 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ nonsense ” and “ worthless.
” Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro concurred with the state ’ s response , saying in a brief he filed on the same day that “ Texas ’ allegations and Dr. Cicchetti ’ s analysis are nonsense.
” He added that Paxton ’ s lawsuit added to a “ cacophony of bogus false claims ” about the election .
( Related : Professor in Texas lawsuit : Odds of Biden winning all four contested states ‘ less than one in a quadrillion to the fourth power ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the brief that Trump ’ s frequent criticism of mail-in voting meant that absentee ballots favoring Biden would be “ widely expected.
” He added that the media had been reporting the likelihood of a number of GOP states turning Democrat in a “ blue shift ” months before the Nov. 3 polls .
Meanwhile , Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel wrote in her state ’ s filing : “ The challenge here is an unprecedented one , without factual foundation or a valid legal basis.
” She remarked during a Dec. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suit would be “ the end of democracy ” in the U.S. Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul said that Trump already had obtained recounts in the state ’ s two most heavily Democratic counties – with no problems in the results .
He wrote in his state ’ s filing : “ There has been no indication of any fraud , or anything else that would call into question the reliability of the election results .
( Related : Milwaukee neighborhoods report “ unusually high ” election turnout despite population drops . )
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ only Republican in the group , said the Lone Star State could not show it has been harmed by the election results in other states .
“ The novel and far-reaching claims that Texas asserts , and the breath-taking remedies it seeks , are impossible to ground in legal principles and unmanageable , ” he wrote in his state ’ s filing .
Visit VoteFraud.news to read more about lawsuits against widespread election fraud .

(Natural News) Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton defended a statistical analysis claiming that Democratic nominee Joe Biden’s victory was “statistically impossible.” Paxton stood by the analysis by economist Charles Cicchetti that said Biden had “less than one in a quadrillion” chance of winning in a clean election. The attorney general’s defense of the claim on Dec. 11 followed his now-dismissed lawsuit against four battleground states.
According to the economist, it was statistically impossible for Biden to overcome President Donald Trump’s leads in four battleground states on the night of the election based on a random population sample.
Paxton cited Cicchetti’s analysis in his election lawsuit against the states of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan and Georgia. The suit alleged that the four defendant states used the pandemic to push through changes to mail-in voting rules – in violation of the Constitution’s Electors Clause mandating only state legislatures decide on election rules.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Paxton commented on the criticism against Cicchetti, saying that these consist “solely of ad hominem attacks.” The attorney general further remarked that the economist’s analysis showing Biden underperformed former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in the U.S.’s 50 largest urban areas “reinforces the unusual statistical improbability of Biden’s vote totals” in five urban areas in the defendant states.
Seventeen Republican states backed the Texas attorney general’s lawsuit through a Dec. 9 amicus curiae brief. Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich later filed his own brief bolstering Paxton’s complaint, while President Donald Trump himself sought permission to join the lawsuit against the four defendant states as a plaintiff.
However, the high court rejected the complaint filed by the Lone Star State for “lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution.” The one-page U.S. Supreme Court decision ruled that Texas “has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections.”
The defendant states slammed the now-dismissed election lawsuit filed by Paxton
The four battleground states mentioned as defendants equally slammed the suit as ridiculous through filings from their attorneys general. The Keystone State responded to the suit on Dec. 10, ridiculing the findings of Cicchetti as “nonsense” and “worthless.”
Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro concurred with the state’s response, saying in a brief he filed on the same day that “Texas’ allegations and Dr. Cicchetti’s analysis are nonsense.” He added that Paxton’s lawsuit added to a “cacophony of bogus false claims” about the election. (Related: Professor in Texas lawsuit: Odds of Biden winning all four contested states ‘less than one in a quadrillion to the fourth power’.)
The Democratic attorney general mentioned in the brief that Trump’s frequent criticism of mail-in voting meant that absentee ballots favoring Biden would be “widely expected.” He added that the media had been reporting the likelihood of a number of GOP states turning Democrat in a “blue shift” months before the Nov. 3 polls.
Meanwhile, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel wrote in her state’s filing: “The challenge here is an unprecedented one, without factual foundation or a valid legal basis.” She remarked during a Dec. 11 press call that Texas winning the suit would be “the end of democracy” in the U.S.
Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul said that Trump already had obtained recounts in the state’s two most heavily Democratic counties – with no problems in the results. He wrote in his state’s filing: “There has been no indication of any fraud, or anything else that would call into question the reliability of the election results. (Related: Milwaukee neighborhoods report “unusually high” election turnout despite population drops.)
Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr, the only Republican in the group, said the Lone Star State could not show it has been harmed by the election results in other states. “The novel and far-reaching claims that Texas asserts, and the breath-taking remedies it seeks, are impossible to ground in legal principles and unmanageable,” he wrote in his state’s filing.
Visit VoteFraud.news to read more about lawsuits against widespread election fraud.
Sources include:
Bloomberg.com
TheEpochTimes.com
You Might Like
FOX13Memphis.com
SupremeCourt.gov [PDF]
TheGuardian.com


thedcclothesline--2020-12-26--Leftist magazine says Whites should only count as half humans when voting

( Natural News ) Ending “ systemic racism ” can not happen simply by giving people with black skin free money and abolishing the police .
The United States must also get rid of the Electoral College and count every black vote twice , according to The Nation .
“ Vote reparations , ” as the left-wing rag is calling it , would effectively bring about “ equality ” by “ empower [ ing ] ” black people “ to replace the oppressive institutions with life-affirming structures of economic , social , and political equality.
” “ And if our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ work , ” The Nation ‘ s Brandon Hasbrouck writes , then “ we could vote them out ” as punishment .
This latest manifesto by the far-left outlining how to give black people the upper hand in American society uses a lot of virtuous-sounding words and concepts to make the case for double-counting every ballot cast by a black person in any election .
take our poll - story continues below Allowing black people only one vote each just like everybody else is only serving to uphold “ structurally racist political institutions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to help “ undo the damage of the Electoral College.
” “ The Constitution ’ s framers set up the Electoral College to protect the interests of slave states , ” Hasbrouck contends .
“ Along with the Senate , the Electoral College was critical in the endurance of slavery and its continuation by other means.
” The truth , of course , is that the Electoral College exists to ensure that minority votes count the same as majority votes .
Without it , a handful of big cities would decide every election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s assessment , however , black people in big cities should be allowed to decide every election .
Anything less is “ racism , ” he suggests .
America is re-segregating itself , thanks to leftists Implementing a vote reparations policy like the one Hasbrouck believes is necessary to create “ equality ” would allow for black people to choose every president , as well as prevent any Republican from ever holding the White House again .
This is , of course , the ultimate goal in trying to abolish the “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that ironically enough led to the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 , which outlawed racially discriminatory voting practices in mostly southern states .
“ Vote reparations would create possibilities to build what W.E.B .
Du Bois called ‘ abolition democracy , ’ or the practice of achieving a racially just society , ” Hasbrouck claims .
“ Abolition democracy invites us to engage with abolition not as a finite goal but as a radical process of challenging injustices wherever and in whatever form they might appear.
” Such a concept @ @ @ @ @ @ @ five-eighths designation that only counted each black vote as five-eighths of a white vote .
The only difference is that now , the call is to have white votes count as only one-half of every black vote .
What is happening , in essence , is that the political left is pitting blacks against whites , and really everyone against whites .
The end result with all this is that there will once again be segregation in our nation , with one set of rules for people with light skin and another set @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
America had been in the process of moving past all this until Democrats decided to make skin color the most pertinent issue of our day .
Now , these “ progressives ” are calling for all kinds of special treatment specifically for blacks at the expense of whites , which is only going to backfire in the end .
“ The left is bound and determined to force another civil war , ” wrote one Infowars commenter .
“ At some point , conservatives are going to have to rise up and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This election may be that turning point.
” For more related news about how the left is bringing us back to the days of race-designated drinking fountains , be sure to check out Libtards.news .

(Natural News) Ending “systemic racism” cannot happen simply by giving people with black skin free money and abolishing the police. The United States must also get rid of the Electoral College and count every black vote twice, according to The Nation.
“Vote reparations,” as the left-wing rag is calling it, would effectively bring about “equality” by “empower[ing]” black people “to replace the oppressive institutions with life-affirming structures of economic, social, and political equality.”
“And if our elected representatives did not prioritize this transformational work,” The Nation‘s Brandon Hasbrouck writes, then “we could vote them out” as punishment.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
This latest manifesto by the far-left outlining how to give black people the upper hand in American society uses a lot of virtuous-sounding words and concepts to make the case for double-counting every ballot cast by a black person in any election.
Allowing black people only one vote each just like everybody else is only serving to uphold “structurally racist political institutions” that must be abolished in order to help “undo the damage of the Electoral College.”
“The Constitution’s framers set up the Electoral College to protect the interests of slave states,” Hasbrouck contends. “Along with the Senate, the Electoral College was critical in the endurance of slavery and its continuation by other means.”
The truth, of course, is that the Electoral College exists to ensure that minority votes count the same as majority votes. Without it, a handful of big cities would decide every election, disenfranchising everybody else.
In Hasbrouck’s assessment, however, black people in big cities should be allowed to decide every election. Anything less is “racism,” he suggests.
America is re-segregating itself, thanks to leftists
Implementing a vote reparations policy like the one Hasbrouck believes is necessary to create “equality” would allow for black people to choose every president, as well as prevent any Republican from ever holding the White House again.
This is, of course, the ultimate goal in trying to abolish the “one man, one vote” principle that ironically enough led to the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which outlawed racially discriminatory voting practices in mostly southern states.
“Vote reparations would create possibilities to build what W.E.B. Du Bois called ‘abolition democracy,’ or the practice of achieving a racially just society,” Hasbrouck claims.
“Abolition democracy invites us to engage with abolition not as a finite goal but as a radical process of challenging injustices wherever and in whatever form they might appear.”
Such a concept hearkens back to Dredd Scott’s five-eighths designation that only counted each black vote as five-eighths of a white vote. The only difference is that now, the call is to have white votes count as only one-half of every black vote.
What is happening, in essence, is that the political left is pitting blacks against whites, and really everyone against whites. The end result with all this is that there will once again be segregation in our nation, with one set of rules for people with light skin and another set of rules for people with dark skin.
America had been in the process of moving past all this until Democrats decided to make skin color the most pertinent issue of our day. Now, these “progressives” are calling for all kinds of special treatment specifically for blacks at the expense of whites, which is only going to backfire in the end.
“The left is bound and determined to force another civil war,” wrote one Infowars commenter. “At some point, conservatives are going to have to rise up and defeat the liberals or lose the country. This election may be that turning point.”
You Might Like
For more related news about how the left is bringing us back to the days of race-designated drinking fountains, be sure to check out Libtards.news.
Sources for this article include:
Infowars.com
NaturalNews.com


thedcclothesline--2020-12-25--Whistleblower who exposed COVID-19 vaccine side effects slapped with lawsuit

( Natural News ) A 40-year-old Indian man is being sued by the Serum Institute of India ( SII ) for going public with gory details about the horrific side effects he experienced following vaccination for the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) .
The man had been participating in a clinical trial for an experimental COVID-19 vaccine when he suffered a “ neurological and psychological ” breakdown .
The series of jabs left him in the hospital for 15 days , reports indicate , eight of which were spent in the intensive care unit ( ICU ) .
It was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ acute neuro-encephalopathy , a condition marked by an altered mental state .
This left him “ totally disoriented ” to the point that he was no longer able to recognize his close family and relatives , according to Science Magazine .
Once he gained back some of his senses , the man filed a lawsuit against SII for $ 676,000 in damages .
He also demanded that SII immediately shut down its clinical trial for the protection of other participants .
take our poll - story continues below Rather than show compassion towards @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , SII responded with a countersuit claiming “ malicious ” defamation against the corporation .
SII further claims that the man it injured was “ specifically informed by the medical team that the complications he suffered were independent of the vaccine trial he underwent.
” Unbelievably , SII is seeking a whopping $ 13.5 million in damages from the man .
“ The COVISHIELD vaccine is safe and immunogenic , ” SII insists .
“ The incident with the Chennai volunteer though highly unfortunate was in no way induced by the vaccine and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the volunteer ’ s medical condition.
” To learn more about how experimental Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) vaccines are highly dangerous and medically useless , be sure to check out Pandemic.news .
Every other Big Pharma corporation hawking COVID-19 vaccines has offered up a similar line claiming that injuries and deaths following vaccination are just a coincidence , and have nothing to do with the jabs .
The mainstream media agrees , and is even going so far as to claim that injuries and deaths following COVID-19 vaccination are “ proof ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ man being sued by SII is still injured , it is important to note .
His wife says her husband is having a difficult time remembering things , as well as remembering how to do things .
“ Even after two weeks , simple things like online payments … he asks me to do , ” she is quoted as saying .
“ He never does that.
” “ He got a good project during the pandemic ; it was an American project that started on October 1 .
Apparently he has lost @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clients have moved back .
They wanted their work to be done quickly.
” It is becoming so obvious that COVID-19 vaccines are dangerous and ineffective that even many doctors and medical professionals who otherwise support vaccination are warning people not to get jabbed .
Others are worried that if Big Pharma does not fess up about people getting injured and killed by the jabs , then the rest of the “ herd ” will decide to forego vaccination entirely .
“ If the vaccines are so safe , the first group to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and their employees of the manufacturing companies , ” wrote one Big League Politics commenter .
“ Second , every person in Congress , every politician , then every government employee .
Third , all those who wish to volunteer .
After that , the rest of us can make a very informed decision .
Just my opinion.
” Another urged all of humanity to reject not only COVID-19 vaccines but all pharmaceutical poisons .
The new mRNA technology being used in COVID-19 vaccines specifically – you can learn more about mRNA at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because nobody knows what it actually does in the long term .

(Natural News) A 40-year-old Indian man is being sued by the Serum Institute of India (SII) for going public with gory details about the horrific side effects he experienced following vaccination for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19).
The man had been participating in a clinical trial for an experimental COVID-19 vaccine when he suffered a “neurological and psychological” breakdown. The series of jabs left him in the hospital for 15 days, reports indicate, eight of which were spent in the intensive care unit (ICU).
It was determined that the man had suffered from acute neuro-encephalopathy, a condition marked by an altered mental state. This left him “totally disoriented” to the point that he was no longer able to recognize his close family and relatives, according to Science Magazine.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Once he gained back some of his senses, the man filed a lawsuit against SII for $676,000 in damages. He also demanded that SII immediately shut down its clinical trial for the protection of other participants.
Rather than show compassion towards the man and take his concerns seriously, SII responded with a countersuit claiming “malicious” defamation against the corporation.
SII further claims that the man it injured was “specifically informed by the medical team that the complications he suffered were independent of the vaccine trial he underwent.” Unbelievably, SII is seeking a whopping $13.5 million in damages from the man.
“The COVISHIELD vaccine is safe and immunogenic,” SII insists. “The incident with the Chennai volunteer though highly unfortunate was in no way induced by the vaccine and Serum Institute of India is sympathetic with the volunteer’s medical condition.”
To learn more about how experimental Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines are highly dangerous and medically useless, be sure to check out Pandemic.news.
Big Pharma’s relentless greed knows no limits
Every other Big Pharma corporation hawking COVID-19 vaccines has offered up a similar line claiming that injuries and deaths following vaccination are just a coincidence, and have nothing to do with the jabs.
The mainstream media agrees, and is even going so far as to claim that injuries and deaths following COVID-19 vaccination are “proof” that the jabs work.
The Indian man being sued by SII is still injured, it is important to note. His wife says her husband is having a difficult time remembering things, as well as remembering how to do things.
“Even after two weeks, simple things like online payments … he asks me to do,” she is quoted as saying. “He never does that.”
“He got a good project during the pandemic; it was an American project that started on October 1. Apparently he has lost that. Because of his condition the clients have moved back. They wanted their work to be done quickly.”
It is becoming so obvious that COVID-19 vaccines are dangerous and ineffective that even many doctors and medical professionals who otherwise support vaccination are warning people not to get jabbed.
Others are worried that if Big Pharma does not fess up about people getting injured and killed by the jabs, then the rest of the “herd” will decide to forego vaccination entirely.
“If the vaccines are so safe, the first group to receive them should be all the management and their employees of the manufacturing companies,” wrote one Big League Politics commenter.
You Might Like
“Second, every person in Congress, every politician, then every government employee. Third, all those who wish to volunteer. After that, the rest of us can make a very informed decision. Just my opinion.”
Another urged all of humanity to reject not only COVID-19 vaccines but all pharmaceutical poisons. The new mRNA technology being used in COVID-19 vaccines specifically – you can learn more about mRNA at this link – should absolutely be avoided because nobody knows what it actually does in the long term.
Sources for this article include:
BigLeaguePolitics.com
NaturalNews.com
Science.news


thedcclothesline--2020-12-27--Millions Of Your Dollars Unconstitutionally Spent By Pentagon To Invade Christmas Movies To Promote

Millions Of Your Dollars Unconstitutionally Spent By Pentagon To Invade Christmas Movies To Promote Military, Incest & A Host Of Other Agendas

I don ’ t know if there is ever going to be anyone with the guys to stop signing spending bills that show a flagrant disregard for the American people ’ s money or the US Constitution , but here ’ s another example of why DC needs to either be reigned in or abolished and a new form of government put in its place , as founding father Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence .
The Pentagon spent millions of dollars from Americans , without authorization per the Constitution , to literally invade Christmas movies this year @ @ @ @ @ @ @ few other agendas .
Love boats , Oedipus complexes , and pants suits on a desert island – a pair of new schmaltzy films , courtesy of the US Department of Defense , are the Christmas present we could all do without .
You know how it goes , you spend half your life waiting for the US military to help make a sentimental , Christmas-themed romantic comedy and then two come along at once : Hallmark ’ s USS Christmas and Netflix ’ s Operation Christmas Drop .
take our poll - @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been made without military support – nearly half of USS Christmas takes place on board an aircraft carrier , and the scenes were filmed aboard the Battleship North Carolina and the USS Yorktown , courtesy of the US Navy .
The plot of Operation Christmas Drop revolves around Andersen Air Force Base in the Western Pacific island of Guam , with full access provided by the US Air Force .
Christmas rom-coms might seem an odd choice for the Pentagon ’ s entertainment liaison offices to support – neither film depicts war or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But if we unwrap them , what we find beneath the enticing shiny paper and ribbons is not merely the disappointment of the same gift they got you three years ago , but the nagging anxiety and sense of betrayal that comes with an unwelcome present .
However , we can not simply re-gift USS Christmas and Operation Christmas Drop and wash our hands of responsibility for the bad choices of others .
Hallmark , the Pentagon , and a partridge in a pear tree Why a giant of cinema such as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Department of Defense ( DOD ) is difficult to pin down , but the relationship goes back at least a decade .
Hundreds of pages of reports from the US military ’ s Hollywood offices , especially those of the Army , detail numerous collaborations with Hallmark since 2010 .
These range from manipulative , tearjerking Mother ’ s Day video messages from deployed sons and daughters to manipulative , heartwarming military-dog-themed reality shows .
Another effort saw them commemorate 2015 Veterans ’ Day with a special film featuring a Congressional Medal of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a highway interchange dedicated to him .
Supporting these sorts of productions helps the DOD expand both its fans and its market share – the lifeblood for any entertainment-media concern .
As one Army report notes , regarding its support to the Second Annual Hero Dog Awards Show , “ By airing on the Hallmark Channel , the demonstration of the Army serving as America ’ s Force of Decisive Action reached an audience that it might not typically reach.
” How a golden retriever could ever be a ‘ Force of Decisive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doesn ’ t clarify .
The point is that while Man of Steel and the Transformers franchise act as attention-grabbing recruitment commercials for teenage boys and young men , in order to reach young women and their mothers , the Pentagon has to try something other than blockbusters about good aliens fighting bad aliens with the help of F-35s and the National Guard .
Likewise , few films and TV shows aimed at women have the necessary story components for promoting the military as the solution to all problems .
Enter Pitch Perfect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the worst Christmas films you ’ ve ever seen .
USS Christmas : An exercise in cringe and condescension Both of these films are based on real-life military traditions , with USS Christmas locking its sights on the US Navy ’ s Tiger Cruise program , which allows the families of service members to take cruises on Navy ships .
In the past , it was aimed at civilians in general , but women could participate only if there were already other women on board .
As an LA Times article from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ How about a cruise ship without bartenders , bands , entertainment , waiters , gift shops , gourmet meals , and midnight buffets ?
And most of the time without women !
’ Homosexual subtexts aside , the program has been adapted into a morale-boosting effort so that active-duty sailors can spend some time with their families , and to generate support from families alongside positive PR .
Guidelines published by the Navy outline what to bring , and , more importantly , what not to bring on a Tiger Cruise .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of any sort , ” as well as alcohol , illegal drugs and “ obscene clothing.
” In USS Christmas , a young female journalist is working for a local newspaper on a story about a banking scandal , but she ’ s bored and looking for something less substantial .
She asks her editor for permission to go on a Tiger Cruise so she can spend some of the festive season with her Navy pilot sister , but also because she ’ s looking for a romance story to write about , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ During the voyage , the ship ’ s captain makes every effort to force his son – who ’ s also a pilot – to fall in love with the journalist , and the two bond while investigating a Vietnam-era love story between yet another Navy pilot and a dancer he met during a Tiger Cruise .
Oh , and our protagonist ’ s deceased father was – you ’ ve guessed it – a Navy pilot .
Despite the journalist ’ s personal rule not to date military guys , originating from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ away from home , by the end of the film , she has fallen for the captain ’ s son , as well as finished her story about that time , 50 years ago , when two people you ’ ve never heard of fell in love and got married .
For his part , the captain ’ s son ( who is at least six inches too tall to be a pilot ) overcomes his obsession with duty , learns to love Christmas , and submits to his father ’ s desire @ @ @ @ @ @ @ woman he has just met .
Along the way , he recruits a five-year-old black kid and teaches our protagonist how to walk down a flight of stairs .
90210 actor Trevor Donovan , who plays the son , tweeted his thanks to the Marines from North Carolina ’ s Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune , who agreed to play background extras in the movie .
As this tweet implies , there is more to this film than meets the eye .
Beneath the insipid , saccharine exterior of USS Christmas lies a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at turning women into recruits or advocates for the Pentagon .
Just as in Pitch Perfect 3 , the plot involves a woman falling in love with a guy who ’ s in the military , hammering home the message that the services are a good place to meet a nice young man .
If you like guys who look like a supernumerary from Triumph of the Will , that is .
However , the film is extremely condescending towards women , suggesting that female journalists want to write only shallow articles about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spouses , who are primarily women , are also trivialized throughout , and , in a woefully misjudged bit of screenwriting , the journalist ’ s Navy pilot sister has the call-sign ‘ Daddy ’ s Girl ’ .
All aboard the good ship Oedipus !
At the end of the film , our protagonist asks her editor if she can cover the military full-time , because “ They ’ re so important in our community.
” In short , this film encourages the women watching to join the military , fall in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( but not to complain when he ’ s sent halfway round the world and never gets to see the kids ) , or to devote their careers to becoming cheerleaders for the military .
The remarkably similar Operation Christmas Drop is , in part , the result of the Pentagon recognizing the importance of streaming services such as Netflix in increasing the range of its Hollywood office ’ s efforts .
In an interview earlier this year , the Pentagon ’ s Branch Chief for Entertainment Media , Lieutenant Colonel Glen Roberts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s work in expanding the scope of the office , saying , “ Dave Evans did a fantastic job coming in after Phil [ Strub ] and cracking the code on working with many different studios and kind of bringing us up to date on social media and the new venues for entertainment media.
” Just like USS Christmas , Netflix ’ s seasonal offering is a story about a young woman who falls in love with a military officer who wouldn ’ t look out of place on a Nazi propaganda poster @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that makes the military look as cuddly as an open fire .
The title comes from a real military operation to provide Micronesian islanders with basic foods , tools , equipment , and medical supplies , using air drops out of the aforementioned Andersen Air Force Base .
The Christmas Drop has taken place every year since the 1950s , and is the longest-running DOD operation , and the oldest humanitarian aid drop in the world .
So far , so Santa Claus .
While the PR value of a film honing in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ air drops alone do not make for an engaging story .
But don ’ t worry – a congresswoman in a Clintonesque blue pants suit wants to close the base , because they ’ re wasting all this money on colonized indigenous types , so she sends her legislative aide out to Guam to conduct a full audit .
The general in charge of the base gets wind of this , so he orders his most silver-tongued , two-faced captain to give the aide a full tour .
The captain sets about convincing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wasting taxpayers ’ money on humanitarianism , and are solely there to maintain the American empire .
Along the way , the dialogue is peppered with lines that were likely inserted by the Air Force ’ s Hollywood office , including a reference to Space Operations – a PR priority for the US military .
The entire premise of Operation Christmas Drop is absurd – the Pentagon would never close a base on the westernmost border of US territory .
Guam was colonized by the Spanish empire in the 1660s , and was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ war .
The base ’ s geostrategic value on the fringes of East Asia makes it a vital square on the chessboard , especially in any potential confrontation with China .
As the film wears on , it emerges that the congresswoman only wants to close the base because the alternative is closing one in her own district .
The dual messages are clear : first , any notion of scaling back the DOD ’ s presence across the world is just a cynical political move , and has nothing to do with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if only the DOD could operate unencumbered by the machinations of elected politicians – indeed , if we could just get rid of democracy – everything would be fine .
The only perspectives offered by the characters in this film are either that helping some of the poorest people in the world is a bad use of public resources , or that thinking about closing US military bases overseas is a moronic consequence of representative democracy .
It ’ s difficult to say which of these films is worse , either as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exercise .
Operation Christmas Drop equates generosity with keeping military bases open and weaponizing the spirit of Christmas for militaristic ends , while simultaneously reassuring the audience that no taxpayers ’ money is going to help these indigenous people , thus maintaining colonial prejudices .
Meanwhile , in USS Christmas , the moral of the story is that , if you ’ re a young lady looking for love , then sign up to the US Navy – though you will have to put up with men suggesting you want to have sex @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with considerable help from the Pentagon , has given us a choice between the devil and the deep blue sea .
And there you have it .
None of this was stopped by Congress .
None of it was stopped by President Trump .
Trump , for all his big talk about draining the swamp , just keeps pumping the swamp full to overflowing into the united States .
Rest assured that it will be even worse in a second term , and even more than that should Joe Biden go into the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from Sons of Liberty Media

I don’t know if there is ever going to be anyone with the guys to stop signing spending bills that show a flagrant disregard for the American people’s money or the US Constitution, but here’s another example of why DC needs to either be reigned in or abolished and a new form of government put in its place, as founding father Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence. The Pentagon spent millions of dollars from Americans, without authorization per the Constitution, to literally invade Christmas movies this year to promote the military, and a few other agendas.
Tom Secker has the story.
Love boats, Oedipus complexes, and pants suits on a desert island – a pair of new schmaltzy films, courtesy of the US Department of Defense, are the Christmas present we could all do without.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
You know how it goes, you spend half your life waiting for the US military to help make a sentimental, Christmas-themed romantic comedy and then two come along at once: Hallmark’s USS Christmas and Netflix’s Operation Christmas Drop.
Neither film could have been made without military support – nearly half of USS Christmas takes place on board an aircraft carrier, and the scenes were filmed aboard the Battleship North Carolina and the USS Yorktown, courtesy of the US Navy. The plot of Operation Christmas Drop revolves around Andersen Air Force Base in the Western Pacific island of Guam, with full access provided by the US Air Force.
Christmas rom-coms might seem an odd choice for the Pentagon’s entertainment liaison offices to support – neither film depicts war or violence of any kind, after all. But if we unwrap them, what we find beneath the enticing shiny paper and ribbons is not merely the disappointment of the same gift they got you three years ago, but the nagging anxiety and sense of betrayal that comes with an unwelcome present. However, we cannot simply re-gift USS Christmas and Operation Christmas Drop and wash our hands of responsibility for the bad choices of others.
Hallmark, the Pentagon, and a partridge in a pear tree
Why a giant of cinema such as Hallmark would want to work with the Department of Defense (DOD) is difficult to pin down, but the relationship goes back at least a decade. Hundreds of pages of reports from the US military’s Hollywood offices, especially those of the Army, detail numerous collaborations with Hallmark since 2010.
These range from manipulative, tearjerking Mother’s Day video messages from deployed sons and daughters to manipulative, heartwarming military-dog-themed reality shows. Another effort saw them commemorate 2015 Veterans’ Day with a special film featuring a Congressional Medal of Honor recipient receiving the accolade of having a highway interchange dedicated to him.
Supporting these sorts of productions helps the DOD expand both its fans and its market share – the lifeblood for any entertainment-media concern. As one Army report notes, regarding its support to the Second Annual Hero Dog Awards Show, “By airing on the Hallmark Channel, the demonstration of the Army serving as America’s Force of Decisive Action reached an audience that it might not typically reach.”
How a golden retriever could ever be a ‘Force of Decisive Action’; however, the report doesn’t clarify.
The point is that while Man of Steel and the Transformers franchise act as attention-grabbing recruitment commercials for teenage boys and young men, in order to reach young women and their mothers, the Pentagon has to try something other than blockbusters about good aliens fighting bad aliens with the help of F-35s and the National Guard.
Likewise, few films and TV shows aimed at women have the necessary story components for promoting the military as the solution to all problems. Enter Pitch Perfect 3, Captain Marvel, and some of the worst Christmas films you’ve ever seen.
USS Christmas: An exercise in cringe and condescension
Both of these films are based on real-life military traditions, with USS Christmas locking its sights on the US Navy’s Tiger Cruise program, which allows the families of service members to take cruises on Navy ships. In the past, it was aimed at civilians in general, but women could participate only if there were already other women on board. As an LA Times article from 1990 promoting the program put it, ‘How about a cruise ship without bartenders, bands, entertainment, waiters, gift shops, gourmet meals, and midnight buffets? And most of the time without women!’
Homosexual subtexts aside, the program has been adapted into a morale-boosting effort so that active-duty sailors can spend some time with their families, and to generate support from families alongside positive PR. Guidelines published by the Navy outline what to bring, and, more importantly, what not to bring on a Tiger Cruise. Among the forbidden items are “weapons of any sort,” as well as alcohol, illegal drugs and “obscene clothing.”
In USS Christmas, a young female journalist is working for a local newspaper on a story about a banking scandal, but she’s bored and looking for something less substantial. She asks her editor for permission to go on a Tiger Cruise so she can spend some of the festive season with her Navy pilot sister, but also because she’s looking for a romance story to write about, and hopes to find on board. During the voyage, the ship’s captain makes every effort to force his son – who’s also a pilot – to fall in love with the journalist, and the two bond while investigating a Vietnam-era love story between yet another Navy pilot and a dancer he met during a Tiger Cruise. Oh, and our protagonist’s deceased father was – you’ve guessed it – a Navy pilot.
You Might Like
Despite the journalist’s personal rule not to date military guys, originating from her childhood when her father was frequently away from home, by the end of the film, she has fallen for the captain’s son, as well as finished her story about that time, 50 years ago, when two people you’ve never heard of fell in love and got married.
For his part, the captain’s son (who is at least six inches too tall to be a pilot) overcomes his obsession with duty, learns to love Christmas, and submits to his father’s desire that he begin a relationship with a woman he has just met. Along the way, he recruits a five-year-old black kid and teaches our protagonist how to walk down a flight of stairs.
90210 actor Trevor Donovan, who plays the son, tweeted his thanks to the Marines from North Carolina’s Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, who agreed to play background extras in the movie.
Big thanks to the service members from Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune who participated in the Navy Ball scene in Wilmington for #USSChristmas. “USS Christmas” premieres on Hallmark Movies & Mysteries on Saturday, Nov. 28 at 9 p.m. pic.twitter.com/OeMa0f4aL6 — Trevor Donovan (@TrevDon) October 15, 2020
As this tweet implies, there is more to this film than meets the eye. Beneath the insipid, saccharine exterior of USS Christmas lies a string of militaristic messages, aimed primarily at turning women into recruits or advocates for the Pentagon. Just as in Pitch Perfect 3 , the plot involves a woman falling in love with a guy who’s in the military, hammering home the message that the services are a good place to meet a nice young man. If you like guys who look like a supernumerary from Triumph of the Will , that is.
However, the film is extremely condescending towards women, suggesting that female journalists want to write only shallow articles about romance. The problems faced by military spouses, who are primarily women, are also trivialized throughout, and, in a woefully misjudged bit of screenwriting, the journalist’s Navy pilot sister has the call-sign ‘Daddy’s Girl’. All aboard the good ship Oedipus!
At the end of the film, our protagonist asks her editor if she can cover the military full-time, because “They’re so important in our community.” In short, this film encourages the women watching to join the military, fall in love with a man in the military (but not to complain when he’s sent halfway round the world and never gets to see the kids), or to devote their careers to becoming cheerleaders for the military.
The remarkably similar Operation Christmas Drop is, in part, the result of the Pentagon recognizing the importance of streaming services such as Netflix in increasing the range of its Hollywood office’s efforts. In an interview earlier this year, the Pentagon’s Branch Chief for Entertainment Media, Lieutenant Colonel Glen Roberts, paid tribute to his predecessor’s work in expanding the scope of the office, saying, “Dave Evans did a fantastic job coming in after Phil [Strub] and cracking the code on working with many different studios and kind of bringing us up to date on social media and the new venues for entertainment media.”
Just like USS Christmas, Netflix’s seasonal offering is a story about a young woman who falls in love with a military officer who wouldn’t look out of place on a Nazi propaganda poster, against a backdrop of Yuletide activity that makes the military look as cuddly as an open fire.
The title comes from a real military operation to provide Micronesian islanders with basic foods, tools, equipment, and medical supplies, using air drops out of the aforementioned Andersen Air Force Base. The Christmas Drop has taken place every year since the 1950s, and is the longest-running DOD operation, and the oldest humanitarian aid drop in the world. So far, so Santa Claus.
While the PR value of a film honing in on this operation is obvious, the air drops alone do not make for an engaging story. But don’t worry – a congresswoman in a Clintonesque blue pants suit wants to close the base, because they’re wasting all this money on colonized indigenous types, so she sends her legislative aide out to Guam to conduct a full audit. The general in charge of the base gets wind of this, so he orders his most silver-tongued, two-faced captain to give the aide a full tour. The captain sets about convincing the aide that they aren’t wasting taxpayers’ money on humanitarianism, and are solely there to maintain the American empire. Along the way, the dialogue is peppered with lines that were likely inserted by the Air Force’s Hollywood office, including a reference to Space Operations – a PR priority for the US military.
The entire premise of Operation Christmas Drop is absurd – the Pentagon would never close a base on the westernmost border of US territory. Guam was colonized by the Spanish empire in the 1660s, and was seized by the US during the Spanish-American war. The base’s geostrategic value on the fringes of East Asia makes it a vital square on the chessboard, especially in any potential confrontation with China.
As the film wears on, it emerges that the congresswoman only wants to close the base because the alternative is closing one in her own district. The dual messages are clear: first, any notion of scaling back the DOD’s presence across the world is just a cynical political move, and has nothing to do with excessive expenditure or neo-colonialism. Second, if only the DOD could operate unencumbered by the machinations of elected politicians – indeed, if we could just get rid of democracy – everything would be fine.
The only perspectives offered by the characters in this film are either that helping some of the poorest people in the world is a bad use of public resources, or that thinking about closing US military bases overseas is a moronic consequence of representative democracy.
Weaponizing the spirit of Christmas
It’s difficult to say which of these films is worse, either as a piece of entertainment or as a propaganda exercise. Operation Christmas Drop equates generosity with keeping military bases open and weaponizing the spirit of Christmas for militaristic ends, while simultaneously reassuring the audience that no taxpayers’ money is going to help these indigenous people, thus maintaining colonial prejudices.
Meanwhile, in USS Christmas, the moral of the story is that, if you’re a young lady looking for love, then sign up to the US Navy – though you will have to put up with men suggesting you want to have sex with your own father.
Hollywood, with considerable help from the Pentagon, has given us a choice between the devil and the deep blue sea.
And there you have it. None of this was stopped by Congress. None of it was stopped by President Trump. Trump, for all his big talk about draining the swamp, just keeps pumping the swamp full to overflowing into the united States. Rest assured that it will be even worse in a second term, and even more than that should Joe Biden go into the White House.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thedcclothesline--2020-12-27--Nashville explosion was actually a missile strike, and the target was the AT&T / NSA hardened switch

Nashville explosion was actually a missile strike, and the target was the AT&T / NSA hardened switching facility “spy hub”

( Natural News ) We now have video evidence that an incoming missile initiated the explosion in Nashville .
The following skyline video , embedded below , shows quite clearly an incoming missile trail immediately before the explosion .
We also now know that the location , which was blurred out by Google street maps , housed the AT & T / NSA VoIP Router Complex , which allows the NSA to spy on all phone conversations and phone texts of anyone using the AT & T network .
The Intercept article , “ The Wiretap Rooms , ” explains @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hubs ” all across America .
The former owner of the building is reportedly Cerebus Capital , which is tied to Yagoobzadeh , which acquired some ownership of Dominion Voting Systems .
Various internet analysts say the blast appears to have been intended to halt a Dominion voting machines audit that was about to take place in the building as well , although that has not yet been confirmed .
take our poll - story continues below No matter what the motive , you can rest assured the media will find some White @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , as that ’ s always their propaganda narrative .
Incoming missile proves this was a military operation , launched from an aircraft The following screen shots from the video ( below ) show the incoming missile trail , meaning this was a military operation , and the missile was fired from an aircraft : And here ’ s about a second later as the missile trail is disappearing , from top to bottom ( indicating the missile is moving from the sky to the ground ) : Finally , just a moment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ You can see the video yourself here , via Brighteon.com : Here ’ s the Google street view at the address , showing the AT & T “ spy hub ” storefront blurred out by Google .
Wonder why ?
Finally , as I explain in this Situation Update , it seems the explosion may have been engineered to maximize the local EMP effect in order to take out sensitive electronics housed in the AT & T / NSA center :

(Natural News) We now have video evidence that an incoming missile initiated the explosion in Nashville. The following skyline video, embedded below, shows quite clearly an incoming missile trail immediately before the explosion.
We also now know that the location, which was blurred out by Google street maps, housed the AT&T / NSA VoIP Router Complex, which allows the NSA to spy on all phone conversations and phone texts of anyone using the AT&T network. The Intercept article, “The Wiretap Rooms,” explains the existence of “hidden NSA spy hubs” all across America.
The former owner of the building is reportedly Cerebus Capital, which is tied to Yagoobzadeh, which acquired some ownership of Dominion Voting Systems.
Various internet analysts say the blast appears to have been intended to halt a Dominion voting machines audit that was about to take place in the building as well, although that has not yet been confirmed.
take our poll - story continues below
Will the 2nd Amendment Be Destroyed By the Biden Admin? Will the 2nd Amendment Be Destroyed By the Biden Admin?
Would You Vote for Trump If He Runs In 2024? * Yes Yes, Only Parts Not a Chance
Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Completing this poll grants you access to DC Dirty Laundry updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
No matter what the motive, you can rest assured the media will find some White conservative gun owner to blame for everything, as that’s always their propaganda narrative.
Incoming missile proves this was a military operation, launched from an aircraft
The following screen shots from the video (below) show the incoming missile trail, meaning this was a military operation, and the missile was fired from an aircraft:
And here’s about a second later as the missile trail is disappearing, from top to bottom (indicating the missile is moving from the sky to the ground):
Finally, just a moment later, the explosion takes place:
You can see the video yourself here, via Brighteon.com:
Here’s the Google street view at the address, showing the AT&T “spy hub” storefront blurred out by Google. Wonder why?
Finally, as I explain in this Situation Update, it seems the explosion may have been engineered to maximize the local EMP effect in order to take out sensitive electronics housed in the AT&T / NSA center:


thedcclothesline--2020-12-27--Situation Update – Treasonous Army generals fear Trump’s “militia option” … because the militia opti

Situation Update – Treasonous Army generals fear Trump’s “militia option” … because the militia option is effective

( Natural News ) In addition to the declassification option , the Insurrection Act and the military re-vote options to secure his second term victory , President Trump has the “ militia option ” to save the republic .
Militias are specifically mentioned as necessary guardians of our constitutional republic in both the Second Amendment and the Insurrection Act .
Most modern militia groups consist of military veterans , former law enforcement , concealed carry holders and other law-abiding citizens who are passionate about liberty and defending America against enemies , both foreign and domestic .
President Trump could , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ groups to converge on Washington D.C. and help prevent a military coup or defend the nation against a communist Chinese ( CCP ) takeover via Joe Biden , a corrupt puppet of China .
By merely calling for help , President Trump would easily see 500,000 to one million armed militia members converging on Washington D.C. , gathering a formidable pro-America group of armed citizens who would be willing to fight to defend this nation .
The idea of such a convergence is causing near panic at the highest levels of the U.S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decided to sell out America and allow the nation to be conquered by communist China .
( This is not true among low-level and mid-level Army personnel , however , most of whom despise their corrupt Army leaders who are traitors . )
take our poll - story continues below As I warn in today ’ s Situation Update for December 26th , America may be headed for its own “ Tiananmen Square ” incident , in which China ’ s Army forces were told to attack civilian militia forces .
But unlike @ @ @ @ @ @ @ believe U.S. Army soldiers will kill their own patriotic countrymen , which means the treasonous Army generals won ’ t succeed in their plot to overthrow the nation and turn America over to the communist Chinese .
• Miles Guo of Gnews says that the intelligence agencies of the world are fully aware Trump will be President for a second term .
• Guo warns that China ’ s domestic economy will instantly collapse as certain events unfold .
Trump ’ s second term will make sure this happens .
• Defense Dept @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spectrum of action President Trump may invoke , from the least controversial ( the courts ) to the most controversial ( military martial law ) .
• Knaggs confirms Trump can appoint a special counsel himself and does not need the AG to do it .
• Discussion of the explosion in Nashville , and why it may have been a pilot test run to find out how easily telecommunications infrastructure can be taken out with conventional explosives .
( Note : New video has since emerged , revealing this attack appears to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , not merely an RV vehicle bomb . )
• Nashville Mayor laughs and smiles when discussing the bombing .
• The US Army may be plotting a physical coup against President Trump , to remove him from the White House .
• Militia defenses may soon be needed at the White House and the D.C. area .
• An analysis of militia structure and effectiveness .
• What happens when cities begin to fall : Survivors exfil to neighboring communities .
• The 20th Amendment and how it changed Inauguration Day from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the full episode here : Hear each day ’ s new podcast at this Brighteon.com channel page :

(Natural News) In addition to the declassification option, the Insurrection Act and the military re-vote options to secure his second term victory, President Trump has the “militia option” to save the republic.
Militias are specifically mentioned as necessary guardians of our constitutional republic in both the Second Amendment and the Insurrection Act. Most modern militia groups consist of military veterans, former law enforcement, concealed carry holders and other law-abiding citizens who are passionate about liberty and defending America against enemies, both foreign and domestic.
President Trump could, at any time, call upon militia groups to converge on Washington D.C. and help prevent a military coup or defend the nation against a communist Chinese (CCP) takeover via Joe Biden, a corrupt puppet of China.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
By merely calling for help, President Trump would easily see 500,000 to one million armed militia members converging on Washington D.C., gathering a formidable pro-America group of armed citizens who would be willing to fight to defend this nation. The idea of such a convergence is causing near panic at the highest levels of the U.S. Army, where treasonous generals have already decided to sell out America and allow the nation to be conquered by communist China. (This is not true among low-level and mid-level Army personnel, however, most of whom despise their corrupt Army leaders who are traitors.)
As I warn in today’s Situation Update for December 26th, America may be headed for its own “Tiananmen Square” incident, in which China’s Army forces were told to attack civilian militia forces. But unlike in China, I don’t believe U.S. Army soldiers will kill their own patriotic countrymen, which means the treasonous Army generals won’t succeed in their plot to overthrow the nation and turn America over to the communist Chinese.
Highlights of today’s Situation Update:
Miles Guo of Gnews says that the intelligence agencies of the world are fully aware Trump will be President for a second term.
Guo warns that China’s domestic economy will instantly collapse as certain events unfold. Trump’s second term will make sure this happens.
Defense Dept. official Andrew Knaggs lays out the spectrum of action President Trump may invoke, from the least controversial (the courts) to the most controversial (military martial law).
Knaggs confirms Trump can appoint a special counsel himself and does not need the AG to do it.
Discussion of the explosion in Nashville, and why it may have been a pilot test run to find out how easily telecommunications infrastructure can be taken out with conventional explosives. (Note: New video has since emerged, revealing this attack appears to be a missile strike from an aircraft, not merely an RV vehicle bomb.)
Nashville Mayor laughs and smiles when discussing the bombing.
The US Army may be plotting a physical coup against President Trump, to remove him from the White House.
Militia defenses may soon be needed at the White House and the D.C. area.
An analysis of militia structure and effectiveness.
What happens when cities begin to fall: Survivors exfil to neighboring communities.
The 20th Amendment and how it changed Inauguration Day from March 4th to January 20th.
Listen to the full episode here:
Hear each day’s new podcast at this Brighteon.com channel page:
https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport


thedcclothesline--2020-12-27--Anthony Fauci lectures Americans over COVID-19: It spread because we have too much freedom

( Natural News ) America ’ s lead immunologist , Dr. Anthony Fauci , has been in government nearly his entire adult life .
Having taken over as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in 1984 , he joined the National Institutes of Health in 1968 — meaning he has been in Washington for more than 50 years .
That ’ s longer than two careers with an average 20-year retirement .
So it ’ s no wonder that Fauci complained in the Washington Post this week that the reason why COVID-19 became a pandemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t because it ’ s a virus and that ’ s what viruses do .
No .
It ’ s because Americans are too free .
Too independent .
We have too much liberty .
take our poll - story continues below Asked whether the current spike in coronavirus cases in some parts of the country ( not all ) is to be blamed on our tradition of individualism or President Donald Trump ’ s refusal to impose national mandates ( like masks and stay-at-home orders — it ’ s not even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do so ) , Fauci said the “ independent spirit in the United States of people not wanting to comply with public health measures has certainly hurt us a bit.
” Got that ?
We are ‘ suffering through this virus ’ because we Americans are just too darned free .
Fauci also went on to complain that too many people continue to treat the virus like a “ hoax.
” “ There are people in various parts of the country who still believe that [ coronavirus ] is a hoax , that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in their own state the hospitals have been overrun with patients in the hospital beds and in the intensive care unit , ” he said .
It ’ s not that the virus is fake — of course it isn ’ t .
What is upsetting and even maddening to an increasing number of Americans is the arbitrary , non-science-related lockdowns , business closures , and other mandates ( like masks ) that clearly aren ’ t mitigating the virus ’ spread but are killing off entire industries and countless small businesses .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ the virus can ’ t hurt you in Walmart but it ’ ll get ya if you go to a gym or a restaurant ’ — are nonsensical , devastating to business owners , and are being made by government representatives who aren ’ t losing a single dime ’ s worth of income .
Guys like Fauci , for instance .
And millionaire governors and mayors like Bill de Blasio and Andrew Cuomo in New York , and Gavin Newsom in California .
Worse , some of these bozos keep getting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mandates requiring the wearing of masks and mandated social distancing .
How can Americans take these people — and this disease — seriously when those who are making the rules a ) aren ’ t losing any money themselves ; and b ) don ’ t seem to take it serious themselves ?
Nevertheless , Fauci went on to say that Americans should forego celebrating Christmas this year — like he advised against gathering for Thanksgiving , though tens of millions did and there was no ‘ Thanksgiving COVID spike ’ in most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to come home … That ’ s painful .
We don ’ t like that , ” he said .
“ But that ’ s just one of the things you ’ re going to have to accept as we go through this unprecedented challenging time.
” He added : “ You try to explain : You ’ re going to have many more Christmases ahead of you .
You ’ ve enjoyed many more Christmases before .
Maybe this is a time to just say , ‘ This is an unusual situation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ last forever.
” No , Dr. Fauci ; we don ’ t ‘ have to accept ’ that we can ’ t see our loved ones during one of our country ’ s most beloved and observed holiday seasons .
Scores of Americans won ’ t be around next Christmas to see their loved ones .
And besides , when did life on earth become a zero-risk endeavor ?
Americans consider and try to mitigate risks every single day — when they decide to get into a vehicle ; take a flight ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the street ; go into a business that might become the site of a mass shooting ; etc .
We figure we ’ re smart enough to take into consideration a virus that , despite the fact that most people are doing what they ’ ve been asked to do , is still spreading .
Free people get to make these decisions .
Enslaved people don ’ t .
See more reporting like this at Freedom.news .

(Natural News) America’s lead immunologist, Dr. Anthony Fauci, has been in government nearly his entire adult life.
Having taken over as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in 1984, he joined the National Institutes of Health in 1968 — meaning he has been in Washington for more than 50 years. That’s longer than two careers with an average 20-year retirement.
So it’s no wonder that Fauci complained in the Washington Post this week that the reason why COVID-19 became a pandemic and spread throughout the United States isn’t because it’s a virus and that’s what viruses do. No.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
It’s because Americans are too free. Too independent. We have too much liberty.
Asked whether the current spike in coronavirus cases in some parts of the country (not all) is to be blamed on our tradition of individualism or President Donald Trump’s refusal to impose national mandates (like masks and stay-at-home orders — it’s not even clear he has the constitutional authority to do so), Fauci said the “independent spirit in the United States of people not wanting to comply with public health measures has certainly hurt us a bit.”
Got that? We are ‘suffering through this virus’ because we Americans are just too darned free.
Fauci also went on to complain that too many people continue to treat the virus like a “hoax.”
“There are people in various parts of the country who still believe that [coronavirus] is a hoax, that it’s fake — even when in their own state the hospitals have been overrun with patients in the hospital beds and in the intensive care unit,” he said.
It’s not that the virus is fake — of course it isn’t. What is upsetting and even maddening to an increasing number of Americans is the arbitrary, non-science-related lockdowns, business closures, and other mandates (like masks) that clearly aren’t mitigating the virus’ spread but are killing off entire industries and countless small businesses.
Worse, these goofy business-related policies — ‘the virus can’t hurt you in Walmart but it’ll get ya if you go to a gym or a restaurant’ — are nonsensical, devastating to business owners, and are being made by government representatives who aren’t losing a single dime’s worth of income.
Guys like Fauci, for instance. And millionaire governors and mayors like Bill de Blasio and Andrew Cuomo in New York, and Gavin Newsom in California. Worse, some of these bozos keep getting caught violating their own lockdowns and COVID mandates requiring the wearing of masks and mandated social distancing.
How can Americans take these people — and this disease — seriously when those who are making the rules a) aren’t losing any money themselves; and b) don’t seem to take it serious themselves?
Nevertheless, Fauci went on to say that Americans should forego celebrating Christmas this year — like he advised against gathering for Thanksgiving, though tens of millions did and there was no ‘Thanksgiving COVID spike’ in most regions.
“They are not going to come home … That’s painful. We don’t like that,” he said. “But that’s just one of the things you’re going to have to accept as we go through this unprecedented challenging time.”
He added: “You try to explain: You’re going to have many more Christmases ahead of you. You’ve enjoyed many more Christmases before. Maybe this is a time to just say, ‘This is an unusual situation, it’s not going to last forever.”
No, Dr. Fauci; we don’t ‘have to accept’ that we can’t see our loved ones during one of our country’s most beloved and observed holiday seasons. Scores of Americans won’t be around next Christmas to see their loved ones.
You Might Like
And besides, when did life on earth become a zero-risk endeavor?
Americans consider and try to mitigate risks every single day — when they decide to get into a vehicle; take a flight; get on the subway; walk down the street; go into a business that might become the site of a mass shooting; etc.
We figure we’re smart enough to take into consideration a virus that, despite the fact that most people are doing what they’ve been asked to do, is still spreading.
Free people get to make these decisions. Enslaved people don’t.
See more reporting like this at Freedom.news.
Sources include:
WashingtonPost.com
NewsTarget.com