thedcclothesline--2020-05-02--NY Times Admits Obama Sent Spies Into Trump Camp

The curtain is being pulled back on the “ Anointed One.
” On Thursday afternoon , Judge Emmet Sullivan unsealed an additional 11-pages of documents showing more background information about how the FBI was targeting former National Security Advisor General Michael Flynn .
Judge Sullivan ’ s release of the unsealed documents is even more revealing than the bombshell revelation of the declassified ; handwritten FBI notes released the night before .
Conservative Treehouse reports- They may not realize it yet , but the new release of the 11-pages of documents implicates Obama .
An electronic communication note revealed that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ General Michael Flynn .
FBI agent Peter Strzok went bananas and immediately began texting FBI officials to keep the investigation open .
Fired FBI Director James Comey , being actively engaged , is important .
Previously Comey said he was unaware of what his agents were doing .
The very next day , January 5th , James Comey goes to the White House for a meeting with President Obama and Vice-President Biden .
January 5th is the White House meeting where National Security Advisor Susan Rice , FBI Director James Comey ( Crossfire @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Yates ( Flynn FARA ) are talking to President Obama about the status of the Flynn FBI investigation and President Obama says “ by the book.
” • 1/4/17 – Peter Strzok says no wait… I have a plan .
• 1/5/17 – James Comey goes to the White House .
• 1/5/17 – President Obama says : OK , but make sure “ by the book.
” [ Susan Rice Memo ] • 1/6/17 – James Comey briefs President-elect Trump in Trump Tower on the Steele Dossier .
[ Comey Memos ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ files relating to his Trump Dossier .
It doesn ’ t take an investigative genius to see what took place here .
Go here Yesterday , The Federalist ’ s Mollie Hemingway wrote about how the New York Times admits that the Obama regime deployed several spies against the Trump campaign in 2016 .
Following months of angry claims by journalists and Democratic operatives that the Obama administration never spied on Donald Trump ’ s 2016 presidential campaign , The New York Times admitted Thursday that multiple overseas intelligence assets were deployed against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is not the first time the Times has revealed widespread spying operations against the campaign .
In addition to noting that long-time informant Stefan Halper was tasked with collecting intelligence on the Trump campaign , the Times story details how a woman was sent overseas under a fake name and occupation to oversee the spy operation .
The woman ’ s real name is not mentioned in the article , though the Times says she went by “ Azra Turk ” and has a relationship with an unidentified federal intelligence agency .
Halper @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agent out of the New York office , according to the article .
While the Times does not identify the agent by name , the paper says the FBI agent spoke at a conference organized by Halper about a 2010 case involving Russians posing as Americans .
The public schedule for a 2011 conference hosted by Halper about the exact same case shows that three FBI counterintelligence agents were invited to speak on the topic .
The three agents publicly identified as speaking at that conference on the topic are George J. Ennis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jr. , and Stephen M. Somma .
Ennis currently serves as the special agent in charge in the FBI ’ s New York office , according to his LinkedIn profile , and worked closely with Preet Bharara , former U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York , a virulent anti-Trump activist whom the president fired in 2017 .
The NYT also admits in its article that the aggressive and unprecedented action of deploying spies and luring American targets overseas to collect intelligence on a rival political campaign “ yielded no fruitful @ @ @ @ @ @ @ information collected by Halper and “ Turk ” was used to justify formal spy warrants against any U.S. citizens .
So long as anti-Trump operatives controlled the FBI and DOJ , this type of leaking and concealing of information worked well .
Most major media outlets have chosen to ignore the spying scandal in favor of non-stop anti-Trump advocacy .
That left actual fact-finding and truth-seeking to a small group of media outlets and a handful of elected lawmakers tasked with oversight of the nation ’ s spy agencies .
When William Barr @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was the first time in years the agency had any real political accountability .
Trump ’ s first attorney general recused himself from overseeing anything related to the 2016 campaign , and his deputy who took over is alleged to have been involved in a conspiracy to oust the president .
While Barr was adamant that Mueller ’ s special counsel probe be unimpeded and his report fully published , he scared the anti-Trump forces in and out of government when he said spying on opposing political campaigns is inappropriate .
His public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ operation against Trump and his affiliates was lawful and appropriate sent shockwaves through an organized anti-Trump political operation that had completely controlled the narrative until recently .
This article originally appeared at 100 Percent FED Up and was republished with permission .
*This article may not be reprinted without expressed permission .
You can follow 100 Percent FED Up on Twitter by clicking here !
Join us at SPREELY if you want REAL NEWS without the leftist censorship !
Also join us at MUMBLIT !

POSTED BY:
From 100 Percent FED Up
The curtain is being pulled back on the “Anointed One.”
On Thursday afternoon, Judge Emmet Sullivan unsealed an additional 11-pages of documents showing more background information about how the FBI was targeting former National Security Advisor General Michael Flynn.
Judge Sullivan’s release of the unsealed documents is even more revealing than the bombshell revelation of the declassified; handwritten FBI notes released the night before.
Conservative Treehouse reports- They may not realize it yet, but the new release of the 11-pages of documents implicates Obama.
An electronic communication note revealed that the FBI was closing their investigation into General Michael Flynn. FBI agent Peter Strzok went bananas and immediately began texting FBI officials to keep the investigation open.
Fired FBI Director James Comey, being actively engaged, is important. Previously Comey said he was unaware of what his agents were doing.
The very next day, January 5th, James Comey goes to the White House for a meeting with President Obama and Vice-President Biden.
January 5th is the White House meeting where National Security Advisor Susan Rice, FBI Director James Comey (Crossfire Hurricane), and Deputy AG Sally Yates (Flynn FARA) are talking to President Obama about the status of the Flynn FBI investigation and President Obama says “by the book.”
1/4/17 – FBI wants to close investigation.
1/4/17 – Peter Strzok says no wait… I have a plan.
1/4/17 – James Comey involved. “7th Floor Involved.”
1/5/17 – James Comey goes to the White House.
1/5/17 – President Obama says: OK, but make sure “by the book.” [Susan Rice Memo]
“President Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities “by the book“.”
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
“The President stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would, “by the book.””
1/6/17 – James Comey briefs President-elect Trump in Trump Tower on the Steele Dossier. [Comey Memos]
1/6/17 – Christopher Steele deletes all files relating to his Trump Dossier.
It doesn’t take an investigative genius to see what took place here. Go here
Yesterday, The Federalist’s Mollie Hemingway wrote about how the New York Times admits that the Obama regime deployed several spies against the Trump campaign in 2016.
Following months of angry claims by journalists and Democratic operatives that the Obama administration never spied on Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, The New York Times admitted Thursday that multiple overseas intelligence assets were deployed against associates of the Republican nominee. It is not the first time the Times has revealed widespread spying operations against the campaign.
In addition to noting that long-time informant Stefan Halper was tasked with collecting intelligence on the Trump campaign, the Times story details how a woman was sent overseas under a fake name and occupation to oversee the spy operation. The woman’s real name is not mentioned in the article, though the Times says she went by “Azra Turk” and has a relationship with an unidentified federal intelligence agency.
You Might Like
Halper was handpicked by a seasoned FBI counterintelligence agent out of the New York office, according to the article. While the Times does not identify the agent by name, the paper says the FBI agent spoke at a conference organized by Halper about a 2010 case involving Russians posing as Americans. The public schedule for a 2011 conference hosted by Halper about the exact same case shows that three FBI counterintelligence agents were invited to speak on the topic.
The three agents publicly identified as speaking at that conference on the topic are George J. Ennis, Jr., Alan E. Kohler, Jr., and Stephen M. Somma. Ennis currently serves as the special agent in charge in the FBI’s New York office, according to his LinkedIn profile, and worked closely with Preet Bharara, former U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, a virulent anti-Trump activist whom the president fired in 2017.
The NYT also admits in its article that the aggressive and unprecedented action of deploying spies and luring American targets overseas to collect intelligence on a rival political campaign “yielded no fruitful information.” It is not clear whether information collected by Halper and “Turk” was used to justify formal spy warrants against any U.S. citizens.
This Explains the Anti-Barr Freakout
So long as anti-Trump operatives controlled the FBI and DOJ, this type of leaking and concealing of information worked well. Most major media outlets have chosen to ignore the spying scandal in favor of non-stop anti-Trump advocacy. That left actual fact-finding and truth-seeking to a small group of media outlets and a handful of elected lawmakers tasked with oversight of the nation’s spy agencies.
When William Barr took over as attorney general, it was the first time in years the agency had any real political accountability. Trump’s first attorney general recused himself from overseeing anything related to the 2016 campaign, and his deputy who took over is alleged to have been involved in a conspiracy to oust the president.
While Barr was adamant that Mueller’s special counsel probe be unimpeded and his report fully published, he scared the anti-Trump forces in and out of government when he said spying on opposing political campaigns is inappropriate. His public vow to examine whether the widespread spying operation against Trump and his affiliates was lawful and appropriate sent shockwaves through an organized anti-Trump political operation that had completely controlled the narrative until recently.
This article originally appeared at 100 Percent FED Up and was republished with permission.
*This article may not be reprinted without expressed permission.
You can follow 100 Percent FED Up on Twitter by clicking here!
Scroll down to leave a comment!
Join us at SPREELY if you want REAL NEWS without the leftist censorship!
Also join us at MUMBLIT!
DINO PORRAZZO at Right Wing Tribune
Join me on Twitter!
God Bless.


thedcclothesline--2020-05-03--The FACTS About Michelle’s Claim That Slaves Built The White House

Do you remember when Michelle Obama spoke at the Democrat National Convention and reminded everyone that she wakes up in a house built by slaves ?
It ’ s true that some slaves were hired to help in the construction of the White House , but most of the work was performed by whites and immigrants from European nations .
Not to mention , the slaves were paid !
My guess would be that these slaves were thrilled about helping build our White House .
But Obama conveniently left these facts out .
take our poll - story continues below @ @ @ @ @ @ @ woke up in a house built by white people , right ?
And since these slaves were paid , which by most definitions of slavery wouldn ’ t make them slaves , then actually she is wrong .
Maybe Michelle should brush up on the historical facts before she opens her pie hole .
And , how about THESE important facts !
The White House Reconstruction , also known as the Truman Reconstruction , was a comprehensive dismantling and rebuilding of the interior of the White House between 1949-1952 .
I ’ m @ @ @ @ @ @ @ before 1949 !
A century-and-a-half of wartime destruction and rebuilding , hurried renovations , additions of new services , technologies , an added Third Floor , and inadequate foundations brought the Executive Residence portion of the White House Complex to near-imminent collapse .
In 1948 architectural and engineering investigations deemed it unsafe for occupancy and President Harry S. Truman , his family , and the entire residence staff were relocated across the street .
For over three years the White House was gutted , expanded , and rebuilt .
The scope , costs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were controversial , with the reconstruction being called both structurally essential , and a disaster .
On December 13 , 1949 construction work began on site .
There was no groundbreaking or commencement ceremony .
Security fencing went around the work area and a solid screen provided privacy for the West Wing .
Temporary sheds and buildings were erected on the South Lawn .
By March 20 , 1950 the removal of historic material slated for salvage had been removed .
New underpinning foundations extending down 20 feet to better bearing material were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Interior steel shoring was added to brace the exterior walls and support the existing Third Floor and roof .
Demolition began with much of the material removed from the interior via chutes through window openings and by wheelbarrow .
By mid-1950 the White House interior was essentially a shell encompassing over a million cubic feet of mostly empty space .
By October the new , permanent steel structure was in place and construction of suspended concrete floors to replace the former wood and masonry structure began .
For the following year-and-a-half , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ windows , wiring , pipes , services , and finishes were constructed .
So , most , if not ALL of the work Obama ’ s ‘ slaves ’ did was demolished and replaced !
I bet she doesn ’ t even know this .
She ’ s a moron that simply wants to fuel the flames of racism .
Look , We do have a history of racism and it ’ s terrible but it is HISTORY !
So get over it and move on .
None of you are slaves .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ scumbags are out of our WHITE HOUSE .
Join us at SPREELY if you want REAL NEWS without the leftist censorship !
Also join us at MUMBLIT !

DINO PORRAZZO at Right Wing Tribune
Do you remember when Michelle Obama spoke at the Democrat National Convention and reminded everyone that she wakes up in a house built by slaves?
It’s true that some slaves were hired to help in the construction of the White House, but most of the work was performed by whites and immigrants from European nations. Not to mention, the slaves were paid! My guess would be that these slaves were thrilled about helping build our White House.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
But Obama conveniently left these facts out.
So in reality, the Obamas also woke up in a house built by white people, right?
And since these slaves were paid, which by most definitions of slavery wouldn’t make them slaves, then actually she is wrong. Maybe Michelle should brush up on the historical facts before she opens her pie hole.
And, how about THESE important facts!
The White House Reconstruction, also known as the Truman Reconstruction, was a comprehensive dismantling and rebuilding of the interior of the White House between 1949-1952.
I’m pretty sure that slavery was abolished long before 1949!
A century-and-a-half of wartime destruction and rebuilding, hurried renovations, additions of new services, technologies, an added Third Floor, and inadequate foundations brought the Executive Residence portion of the White House Complex to near-imminent collapse. In 1948 architectural and engineering investigations deemed it unsafe for occupancy and President Harry S. Truman, his family, and the entire residence staff were relocated across the street. For over three years the White House was gutted, expanded, and rebuilt. The scope, costs, and historical authenticity of the work were controversial, with the reconstruction being called both structurally essential, and a disaster.
HEY LOOK- NO SLAVES!!!
On December 13, 1949 construction work began on site. There was no groundbreaking or commencement ceremony. Security fencing went around the work area and a solid screen provided privacy for the West Wing. Temporary sheds and buildings were erected on the South Lawn. By March 20, 1950 the removal of historic material slated for salvage had been removed. New underpinning foundations extending down 20 feet to better bearing material were hand dug under the existing exterior walls. Interior steel shoring was added to brace the exterior walls and support the existing Third Floor and roof. Demolition began with much of the material removed from the interior via chutes through window openings and by wheelbarrow.
By mid-1950 the White House interior was essentially a shell encompassing over a million cubic feet of mostly empty space. By October the new, permanent steel structure was in place and construction of suspended concrete floors to replace the former wood and masonry structure began. For the following year-and-a-half, the new interior walls, doors, windows, wiring, pipes, services, and finishes were constructed.
So, most, if not ALL of the work Obama’s ‘slaves’ did was demolished and replaced!
You Might Like
I bet she doesn’t even know this. She’s a moron that simply wants to fuel the flames of racism.
Look, We do have a history of racism and it’s terrible but it is HISTORY! So get over it and move on. None of you are slaves. NONE OF YOU!
Thank God those scumbags are out of our WHITE HOUSE.
(h/t Conservative Tribune)
Scroll down to leave a comment!
Join us at SPREELY if you want REAL NEWS without the leftist censorship!
Also join us at MUMBLIT!
DINO PORRAZZO at Right Wing Tribune
Join me on Twitter!
God Bless.


thedcclothesline--2020-05-03--Terror-Tied CAIR Attacks General For Speaking About Muslim Child Sex Trafficking Gangs

The terror-tied group is banking on public ignorance and the complicity of an unfailing left-wing media to cover , censor and scrub for Islam .
The child sex trafficking gangs are Muslim .
That is a fact .
Reporting it – well , that ’ s a whole other story .
CAIR slams General for “ revolting promotion of the anti-Muslim trope that Muslim youth in UK engage in sex crimes ” take our poll - story continues below Robert McCaw and the others at Hamas-linked CAIR are banking on the ignorance of the public .
The phenomenon of Muslim @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to those who dare to face the facts .
The Guardian reported in October 2014 that “ sexual exploitation of vulnerable children has become the social norm in some parts of Greater Manchester.
” The perpetrators were overwhelmingly Muslim men , as in Rochdale , where a group of Muslims were involved in a large-scale sex trafficking ring involving young non-Muslim girls .
In the British town of Rotherham , Muslim gangs brutalized , sexually assaulted , and raped over 1,400 young British girls , while authorities remained extremely reluctant to say or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of being labeled “ racist.
” Rotherham officials “ described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought as racist ; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.
” And what were the ethnic origins of those perpetrators ?
The Guardian report didn ’ t mention it ( which in itself was telling ) , but 75 % , and probably more ( since it was so politically unacceptable to report such things ) of these rape and sexual exploitation gangs were “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for “ Muslim.
” According to official figures released in December 2019 , over 18,700 children had fallen prey to grooming and rape gangs in Britain during the previous year .
This was up from some 15,000 victims in 2014 .
Former Home Secretary Sajid Javid noted that the perpetrators included a “ high proportion of men of Pakistani heritage.
” That ’ s why the British authorities were so slow to act .
The mother of one rape gang victim noted that South Yorkshire Police “ would not listen and left you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what they wanted and they never questioned anybody about what was happening.
” One South Yorkshire Police official even told this victim ’ s father that the perpetrators could not be prosecuted because of who they were : “ With it being Asians , we can ’ t afford for this to be coming out.
” The official also observed that the rape gangs had been operating freely in Britain for thirty years .
Politicalite “ reported in 2018 that ex-North West Chief prosecutor alleged that the Home Office ordered police to ignore @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Home Secretary Jacqui Smith had nothing to do with the order.
” The news site also noted that Nazir Afzal , who “ successfully prosecuted the notorious Rochdale rape gang told the BBC in 2018 that in 2008 the Home Office sent a circular email to all police forces calling on them to not investigate the sexual exploitation of young girls in towns and cities across the UK.
” Said Afzal : “ You may not know this , but back in 2008 the Home Office sent a circular to all police forces @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as these young girls who are being exploited in towns and cities , we believe they have made an informed choice about their sexual behaviour and therefore it is not for you police officers to get involved in.
’ ” Twelve years later , the same reluctance to face this problem was still prevailing .
In January 2020 , the Daily Mail reported that according to a “ damning ” new report , “ sex attacks on young girls by Asian grooming gangs were ignored by police fear of stoking racial tensions , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Birmingham Mail reported in November 2014 that Birmingham ’ s City Council buried a report about Muslim cab drivers exploiting non-Muslim girls back in 1990.A researcher , Dr. Jill Jesson , drafted a report on this issue .
But , she explained , “ the report was shelved , buried , it was never made public .
I was shocked to be told that copies of the report were to be destroyed and that nothing further was to be said .
Clearly , there was something in this report that someone in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is Robert McCaw trying to kid ?
Why , everyone .
And if he keeps this up , he may end up getting a plum position in the British government .
“ CAIR Urges Senate to Reject Anticipated Nomination of ‘ Anti-Muslim Conspiracy Theorist ’ Anthony J. Tata for Pentagon Post , ” by Ibrahim Hooper , Hamas-linked CAIR , April 29 , 2020 : ( WASHINGTON , DC.
, 4/29/20 ) – The Council on American-Islamic Relations ( CAIR ) , the nation ’ s largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization @ @ @ @ @ @ @ U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services to reject President Trump ’ s reported nomination of anti-Muslim conspiracy theorist Ret .
Army Brig .
Gen. Anthony J. Tata to the position of undersecretary of defense for policy .
While not yet officially nominated , news of Tata being tapped by Trump has been reported by Politico and the Washington Post .
Last year , Tata authored a novel titled “ Double Crossfire ” that falsely claimed young Muslim men in Great Britain engage in the “ gang-raping [ of ] British women as part @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such crimes are covered up by the government and media .
This anti-Muslim trope is widely used by Islamophobic far-right groups and white supremacists in Europe .
In 2018 , Tata also said on Fox News that “ there is intent to harm Western society by Islam ” and “ it ’ s a truism that has to be built into policy so we can strengthen our borders.
” “ CAIR strongly urges the Senate Armed Services Committee to reject anti-Muslim conspiracy theorist Tata ’ s nomination to the number three job in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Director of Government Affairs Robert S. McCaw .
“ Tata ’ s revolting promotion of the anti-Muslim trope that Muslim youth in Britain engage in sex crimes as a rite of passage and that Islam is a perceived threat to the West makes him totally unfit to serve as the Pentagon ’ s policy chief.
” …

The terror-tied group is banking on public ignorance and the complicity of an unfailing left-wing media to cover, censor and scrub for Islam.
The child sex trafficking gangs are Muslim. That is a fact. Reporting it – well, that’s a whole other story.
Scroll here.
CAIR slams General for “revolting promotion of the anti-Muslim trope that Muslim youth in UK engage in sex crimes”
By Robert Spencer. May 1, 2020:
take our poll - story continues below
Will the 2nd Amendment Be Destroyed By the Biden Admin? Will the 2nd Amendment Be Destroyed By the Biden Admin?
Would You Vote for Trump If He Runs In 2024? * Yes Yes, Only Parts Not a Chance
Email *
Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Completing this poll grants you access to DC Dirty Laundry updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Robert McCaw and the others at Hamas-linked CAIR are banking on the ignorance of the public. The phenomenon of Muslim rape gangs in Britain is well known to those who dare to face the facts.
The Guardian reported in October 2014 that “sexual exploitation of vulnerable children has become the social norm in some parts of Greater Manchester.” The perpetrators were overwhelmingly Muslim men, as in Rochdale, where a group of Muslims were involved in a large-scale sex trafficking ring involving young non-Muslim girls.
In the British town of Rotherham, Muslim gangs brutalized, sexually assaulted, and raped over 1,400 young British girls, while authorities remained extremely reluctant to say or do anything in response, for fear of being labeled “racist.” Rotherham officials “described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought as racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.”
And what were the ethnic origins of those perpetrators? The Guardian report didn’t mention it (which in itself was telling), but 75%, and probably more (since it was so politically unacceptable to report such things) of these rape and sexual exploitation gangs were “Asian,” which is British Newspeak for “Muslim.”
According to official figures released in December 2019, over 18,700 children had fallen prey to grooming and rape gangs in Britain during the previous year. This was up from some 15,000 victims in 2014.
Former Home Secretary Sajid Javid noted that the perpetrators included a “high proportion of men of Pakistani heritage.” That’s why the British authorities were so slow to act. The mother of one rape gang victim noted that South Yorkshire Police “would not listen and left you in dangerous situations, letting people do what they wanted and they never questioned anybody about what was happening.” One South Yorkshire Police official even told this victim’s father that the perpetrators could not be prosecuted because of who they were: “With it being Asians, we can’t afford for this to be coming out.” The official also observed that the rape gangs had been operating freely in Britain for thirty years.
Politicalite “reported in 2018 that ex-North West Chief prosecutor alleged that the Home Office ordered police to ignore grooming gang claims in 2008 – though Home Secretary Jacqui Smith had nothing to do with the order.” The news site also noted that Nazir Afzal, who “successfully prosecuted the notorious Rochdale rape gang told the BBC in 2018 that in 2008 the Home Office sent a circular email to all police forces calling on them to not investigate the sexual exploitation of young girls in towns and cities across the UK.” Said Afzal: “You may not know this, but back in 2008 the Home Office sent a circular to all police forces in the country saying ‘as far as these young girls who are being exploited in towns and cities, we believe they have made an informed choice about their sexual behaviour and therefore it is not for you police officers to get involved in.’”
Twelve years later, the same reluctance to face this problem was still prevailing. In January 2020, the Daily Mail reported that according to a “damning” new report, “sex attacks on young girls by Asian grooming gangs were ignored by police fear of stoking racial tensions, a damning report has ruled.” The Birmingham Mail reported in November 2014 that Birmingham’s City Council buried a report about Muslim cab drivers exploiting non-Muslim girls back in 1990.A researcher, Dr. Jill Jesson, drafted a report on this issue. But, she explained, “the report was shelved, buried, it was never made public. I was shocked to be told that copies of the report were to be destroyed and that nothing further was to be said. Clearly, there was something in this report that someone in the department was worried about.”
So who is Robert McCaw trying to kid? Why, everyone. And if he keeps this up, he may end up getting a plum position in the British government.
“CAIR Urges Senate to Reject Anticipated Nomination of ‘Anti-Muslim Conspiracy Theorist’ Anthony J. Tata for Pentagon Post,” by Ibrahim Hooper, Hamas-linked CAIR, April 29, 2020:
(WASHINGTON, DC., 4/29/20) – The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization, today called on members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services to reject President Trump’s reported nomination of anti-Muslim conspiracy theorist Ret. Army Brig. Gen. Anthony J. Tata to the position of undersecretary of defense for policy.
While not yet officially nominated, news of Tata being tapped by Trump has been reported by Politico and the Washington Post.
Last year, Tata authored a novel titled “Double Crossfire” that falsely claimed young Muslim men in Great Britain engage in the “gang-raping [of] British women as part of their transition to manhood” and such crimes are covered up by the government and media. This anti-Muslim trope is widely used by Islamophobic far-right groups and white supremacists in Europe.
In 2018, Tata also said on Fox News that “there is intent to harm Western society by Islam” and “it’s a truism that has to be built into policy so we can strengthen our borders.”
“CAIR strongly urges the Senate Armed Services Committee to reject anti-Muslim conspiracy theorist Tata’s nomination to the number three job in the Defense Department,” said CAIR Director of Government Affairs Robert S. McCaw. “Tata’s revolting promotion of the anti-Muslim trope that Muslim youth in Britain engage in sex crimes as a rite of passage and that Islam is a perceived threat to the West makes him totally unfit to serve as the Pentagon’s policy chief.”…
Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller
h/t TWS


thedcclothesline--2020-05-03--Paul Sperry: Obama & Biden Under Formal Investigation For Corruption In Ukraine

Investigative reporter Paul Sperry has announced that at least three Senate committees are formally investigating Obama-Biden-Ukrainian collusion to damage Donald Trump ’ s chances to win the 2016 presidential election .
take our poll - story continues below Patriots hoping that this will expose the corrupt alliance between then-President Obama , Vice President Joe Biden , wannabe president Hillary Clinton , and the Ukrainian government under the directions of the United States State Department , should not hold their breath .
With all the corruption that we know exists in the DC swamp – $ 23T worth , at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ name the last politician to face charges as a result of their misfeasance ?
No one wants to throw stones lest they become the target themselves .
There ’ s an unwritten code that scurrilous politicians adhere to – people in glass houses shouldn ’ t throw stones .
While we can continue to hope this time will be different , the most likely scenario is that these committees will amount to little more than political grandstanding used to score points with the Republican base .
Republicans will leave just enough doubt on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ absolution , as well .
Something along the lines of , “ I ’ m the most investigated politician ever , ” ala Hillary Clinton .
Was any politician held accountable for Benghazi ?
The IRS scandal ?
Fast and Furious ?

POSTED BY:
By
OPINION| Lawrence David| Uh oh.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Investigative reporter Paul Sperry has announced that at least three Senate committees are formally investigating Obama-Biden-Ukrainian collusion to damage Donald Trump’s chances to win the 2016 presidential election.
Patriots hoping that this will expose the corrupt alliance between then-President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, wannabe president Hillary Clinton, and the Ukrainian government under the directions of the United States State Department, should not hold their breath.
With all the corruption that we know exists in the DC swamp – $23T worth, at the least – can someone reading this please name the last politician to face charges as a result of their misfeasance?
… Still waiting.
Politicians gonna politic.
No one wants to throw stones lest they become the target themselves.
There’s an unwritten code that scurrilous politicians adhere to – people in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.
While we can continue to hope this time will be different, the most likely scenario is that these committees will amount to little more than political grandstanding used to score points with the Republican base.
Republicans will leave just enough doubt on the table so that Democrats can claim absolution, as well. Something along the lines of, “I’m the most investigated politician ever,” ala Hillary Clinton.
Was any politician held accountable for Benghazi? The IRS scandal? Fast and Furious?
You Might Like
Like you, we remain hopeful that this time these committees will actually generate criminal referrals but we can’t help but feel that what this really amounts to are the adults in the Senate sending a message to Pelosi not to waste their time with impeachment.
This article originally appeared atand was republished with permission.
*Some edits were made.


thedcclothesline--2020-05-03--Bill and Melinda Gates are preppers: Couple began storing food in their home years ago in case of a

Bill and Melinda Gates are preppers: Couple began storing food in their home years ago in case of a pandemic

( Natural News ) When you give it some thought , it makes sense that one of the world ’ s wealthiest couples would have a ‘ back-up plan ’ in case the world went to heck in a hand basket , and it turns out they did .
During a recent BBC Radio Live program , Melinda Gates , co-founder of the couple ’ s foundation , said that she and her hubby stored food in the basement of their home years ago in case the world was struck by a deadly pandemic .
“ In terms of your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about you and Bill for being so familiar with this — had you made any preparations ?
” host Emma Barrett began .
“ I was very struck by when I rewatched Bill ’ s talk from 2015 , he rolled that barrel onto the stage and said , ‘ When I was growing up , nuclear was kind of the threat , everyone was very worried about bombs and all sorts of threats like that , and we had this barrel in our basement where we ’ d have to go and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in.
’ Had you done preparation in your own lives ?
” “ We had done some preparation , yes , ” Melinda Gates responded .
“ A number of years ago , we talked about , ‘ What if there wasn ’ t clean water ?
What if there wasn ’ t enough food ?
Where might we go ?
What might we do as a family ?
’ So , I think we should leave those preparations to ourselves .
We had prepared , and had some food in the basement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re all in the same situation , ” she continued , Breitbart News reported .
Well , not really the same situation ; 99.999 percent of the world ’ s population are not multibillionaires .
And that ’ s not to begrudge the Gates ’ one penny .
Whatever vaccine faults he may have , from the outset he began building equipment and technology that filled a need in society , and that ’ s what capitalism is all about .
So , good for him .
But the fact is , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have a lot of food and other resources in their Xanadu 2.0 home overlooking Lake Washington , in Medina , Wash .
The home is 66,000 square feet and in 2009 , at least , it was valued at nearly $ 150 million .
As the pestilence began or started to close in… Here ’ s something else : It ’ s known for the technology it incorporates .
The couple broke ground on the home in December 1988 , and it was finally opened in 2005 , so it ’ s likely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ build-ins including bunkers , food storage , electricity generation plants , and , perhaps , even the ability to purify water .
Plus , the couple just purchased a $ 43 million home on oceanfront property in Del Mar , Calif. , so there ’ s that .
( Related : Coronavirus is a dream come true for Bill Gates , who lives to vaccinate . )
The Gates ’ probably also have an ‘ escape plan , ’ so to speak , like many of the world ’ s uber-rich .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , many of them have snagged property in New Zealand — so much so , in fact , that the country ’ s parliament was considering limiting land sales to foreigners because there wouldn ’ t be any left for New Zealanders .
Silicon Valley multimillionaires and multibillionaires were having underground bunkers built in the U.S. and shipped to the tiny Pacific Island country , then buried several feet underground , the plan being the luxury bunkers would serve as redoubts where the rich would ride out pandemics or world war or nuclear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or started to close in , the uber-rich plan to grab prepared baggage including clothing , supplies and weapons , then take prepared transportation to private planes at local airports , then meet up with similarly wealthy individuals at larger airports with larger jets — then escape .
No doubt that Bill and Melinda Gates have similar plans .
And as she indicated in her BBC interview , we already know they are preppers .

(Natural News) When you give it some thought, it makes sense that one of the world’s wealthiest couples would have a ‘back-up plan’ in case the world went to heck in a hand basket, and it turns out they did.
Bill and Melinda Gates are preppers.
During a recent BBC Radio Live program, Melinda Gates, co-founder of the couple’s foundation, said that she and her hubby stored food in the basement of their home years ago in case the world was struck by a deadly pandemic.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Like now.
https://twitter.com/bbc5live/status/1250706953845837824?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1250706953845837824&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.naturalnews.com%2F2020-05-02-bill-melinda-gates-preppers-storing-food-years-ago.html
“In terms of your own — again, just to talk about you and Bill for being so familiar with this — had you made any preparations?” host Emma Barrett began. “I was very struck by when I rewatched Bill’s talk from 2015, he rolled that barrel onto the stage and said, ‘When I was growing up, nuclear was kind of the threat, everyone was very worried about bombs and all sorts of threats like that, and we had this barrel in our basement where we’d have to go and eat out of it if we went in.’ Had you done preparation in your own lives?”
“We had done some preparation, yes,” Melinda Gates responded.
“A number of years ago, we talked about, ‘What if there wasn’t clean water? What if there wasn’t enough food? Where might we go? What might we do as a family?’ So, I think we should leave those preparations to ourselves. We had prepared, and had some food in the basement in case needed, and now we’re all in the same situation,” she continued, Breitbart News reported.
Well, not really the same situation; 99.999 percent of the world’s population are not multibillionaires.
And that’s not to begrudge the Gates’ one penny. Whatever vaccine faults he may have, from the outset he began building equipment and technology that filled a need in society, and that’s what capitalism is all about. So, good for him.
But the fact is, the Gates’ most probably a) have a lot of food and other resources in their Xanadu 2.0 home overlooking Lake Washington, in Medina, Wash. The home is 66,000 square feet and in 2009, at least, it was valued at nearly $150 million.
As the pestilence began or started to close in…
Here’s something else: It’s known for the technology it incorporates. The couple broke ground on the home in December 1988, and it was finally opened in 2005, so it’s likely there are all kinds of ‘prepper’ build-ins including bunkers, food storage, electricity generation plants, and, perhaps, even the ability to purify water.
Plus, the couple just purchased a $43 million home on oceanfront property in Del Mar, Calif., so there’s that. (Related: Coronavirus is a dream come true for Bill Gates, who lives to vaccinate.)
The Gates’ probably also have an ‘escape plan,’ so to speak, like many of the world’s uber-rich.
As Bloomberg News reported in September 2018, many of them have snagged property in New Zealand — so much so, in fact, that the country’s parliament was considering limiting land sales to foreigners because there wouldn’t be any left for New Zealanders.
Silicon Valley multimillionaires and multibillionaires were having underground bunkers built in the U.S. and shipped to the tiny Pacific Island country, then buried several feet underground, the plan being the luxury bunkers would serve as redoubts where the rich would ride out pandemics or world war or nuclear holocaust.
You Might Like
As the pestilence began, or started to close in, the uber-rich plan to grab prepared baggage including clothing, supplies and weapons, then take prepared transportation to private planes at local airports, then meet up with similarly wealthy individuals at larger airports with larger jets — then escape.
No doubt that Bill and Melinda Gates have similar plans. And as she indicated in her BBC interview, we already know they are preppers.
Sources include:
Bloomberg.com
Breitbart.com
NaturalNews.com


thedcclothesline--2020-05-03--As We Trust Govt on COVID-19, Never Forget America’s History of Gruesome Human/Animal Experiments

( TRI ) — I have never known any government to put the best interests of its people first , and this COVID-19 pandemic is no exception .
Now this isn ’ t intended to be a debate over whether COVID-19 is a legitimate health crisis or a manufactured threat .
Such crises can—and are—manipulated by governments in order to expand their powers .
As such , it is possible for the virus to be both a genuine menace to public health and a menace to freedom .
Yet we can ’ t afford to overlook the fact that governments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government , have unleashed untold horrors upon the world in the name of global conquest , the acquisition of greater wealth , scientific experimentation , and technological advances , all packaged in the guise of the greater good .
take our poll - story continues below While the U.S. government is currently looking into the possibility that the novel coronavirus spread from a Chinese laboratory rather than a market , the virus could just as easily have been created by the U.S. government or one of its allies .
After all , grisly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have become synonymous with the U.S. government , which has meted out untold horrors against humans and animals alike .
For instance , did you know that the U.S. government has been buying hundreds of dogs and cats from “ Asian meat markets ” as part of a gruesome experiment into food-borne illnesses ?
The cannibalistic experiments involve killing cats and dogs purchased from Colombia , Brazil , Vietnam , China and Ethiopia , and then feeding the dead remains to laboratory kittens , bred in government laboratories for the express purpose of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ killed .
It gets more gruesome .
The Department of Veterans Affairs has been removing parts of dogs ’ brains to see how it affects their breathing ; applying electrodes to dogs ’ spinal cords ( before and after severing them ) to see how it impacts their cough reflexes ; and implanting pacemakers in dogs ’ hearts and then inducing them to have heart attacks ( before draining their blood ) .
All of the laboratory dogs are killed during the course of these experiments .
It ’ s not just animals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by government agencies .
“ We the people ” have also become the police state ’ s guinea pigs : to be caged , branded , experimented upon without our knowledge or consent , and then conveniently discarded and left to suffer from the after-effects .
Back in 2017 , FEMA “ inadvertently ” exposed nearly 10,000 firefighters , paramedics and other responders to a deadly form of ricin during simulated bioterrorism response sessions .
In 2015 , it was discovered that an Army lab had been “ mistakenly ” shipping deadly anthrax @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decade .
While these particular incidents have been dismissed as “ accidents , ” you don ’ t have to dig very deep or go very back in the nation ’ s history to uncover numerous cases in which the government deliberately conducted secret experiments on an unsuspecting populace—citizens and noncitizens alike—making healthy people sick by spraying them with chemicals , injecting them with infectious diseases and exposing them to airborne toxins .
At the time , the government reasoned that it was legitimate to experiment on people who did not have full @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mental patients , and poor blacks .
In Alabama , for example , 600 black men with syphilis were allowed to suffer without proper medical treatment in order to study the natural progression of untreated syphilis .
In California , older prisoners had testicles from livestock and from recently executed convicts implanted in them to test their virility .
In Connecticut , mental patients were injected with hepatitis .
In Maryland , sleeping prisoners had a pandemic flu virus sprayed up their noses .
In Georgia , two dozen “ volunteering ” prison @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their urinary tracts through the penis .
In Michigan , male patients at an insane asylum were exposed to the flu after first being injected with an experimental flu vaccine .
In Minnesota , 11 public service employee “ volunteers ” were injected with malaria , then starved for five days .
In New York , dying patients had cancer cells introduced into their systems .
In Ohio , over 100 inmates were injected with live cancer cells .
Also in New York , prisoners at a reformatory prison were also split into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stomach virus was spread : the first group was made to swallow an unfiltered stool suspension , while the second group merely breathed in germs sprayed into the air .
And in Staten Island , children with mental retardation were given hepatitis orally and by injection to see if they could then be cured .
As the Associated Press reports , “ The late 1940s and 1950s saw huge growth in the U.S. pharmaceutical and health care industries , accompanied by a boom in prisoner experiments funded by both the government and corporations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ half the states allowed prisoners to be used as medical guinea pigs … because they were cheaper than chimpanzees.
” Moreover , “ Some of these studies , mostly from the 1940s to the ’ 60s , apparently were never covered by news media .
Others were reported at the time , but the focus was on the promise of enduring new cures , while glossing over how test subjects were treated.
” How many government incursions into our freedoms have been blacked out , buried under “ entertainment ” news headlines , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to suggest that anyone voicing a word of caution is paranoid or conspiratorial ?
Unfortunately , these incidents are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the atrocities the government has inflicted on an unsuspecting populace in the name of secret experimentation .
For instance , there was the U.S. military ’ s secret race-based testing of mustard gas on more than 60,000 enlisted men .
As NPR reports , “ All of the World War II experiments with mustard gas were done in secret and weren ’ t recorded @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Most do not have proof of what they went through .
They received no follow-up health care or monitoring of any kind .
And they were sworn to secrecy about the tests under threat of dishonorable discharge and military prison time , leaving some unable to receive adequate medical treatment for their injuries , because they couldn ’ t tell doctors what happened to them.
” And then there was the CIA ’ s MKULTRA program in which hundreds of unsuspecting American civilians and military personnel were dosed with LSD , some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ drinks at the beach , in city bars , at restaurants .
As Time reports , “ before the documentation and other facts of the program were made public , those who talked of it were frequently dismissed as being psychotic.
” Now one might argue that this is all ancient history and that the government today is different from the government of yesteryear , but has the U.S. government really changed ?
Has the government become any more humane , any more respectful of the rights of the citizenry ?
Has it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ abide by the rule of law ?
Has it become any more truthful about its activities ?
Has it become any more cognizant of its appointed role as a guardian of our rights ?
Or has the government simply hunkered down and hidden its nefarious acts and dastardly experiments under layers of secrecy , legalism and obfuscations ?
Has it not become wilier , more slippery , more difficult to pin down ?
Having mastered the Orwellian art of Doublespeak and followed the Huxleyan blueprint for distraction and diversion , are we not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ craftier and more conniving that it used to be ?
Consider this : after revelations about the government ’ s experiments spanning the 20th century spawned outrage , the government began looking for human guinea pigs in other countries , where “ clinical trials could be done more cheaply and with fewer rules.
” In Guatemala , prisoners and patients at a mental hospital were infected with syphilis , “ apparently to test whether penicillin could prevent some sexually transmitted disease.
” In Uganda , U.S.-funded doctors “ failed to give the AIDS @ @ @ @ @ @ @ women in a study… even though it would have protected their newborns.
” Meanwhile , in Nigeria , children with meningitis were used to test an antibiotic named Trovan .
Eleven children died and many others were left disabled .
The more things change , the more they stay the same .
Case in point : back in 2016 , it was announced that scientists working for the Department of Homeland Security would begin releasing various gases and particles on crowded subway platforms as part of an experiment aimed at testing bioterror airflow @ @ @ @ @ @ @ insisted that the gases released into the subways by the DHS were nontoxic and did not pose a health risk .
It ’ s in our best interests , they said , to understand how quickly a chemical or biological terrorist attack might spread .
And look how cool the technology is—said the government cheerleaders—that scientists can use something called DNATrax to track the movement of microscopic substances in air and food .
( Imagine the kinds of surveillance that could be carried out by the government using trackable airborne microscopic substances you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you , this is the same government that in 1949 sprayed bacteria into the Pentagon ’ s air handling system , then the world ’ s largest office building .
In 1950 , special ops forces sprayed bacteria from Navy ships off the coast of Norfolk and San Francisco , in the latter case exposing all of the city ’ s 800,000 residents .
In 1953 , government operatives staged “ mock ” anthrax attacks on St. Louis , Minneapolis , and Winnipeg using generators placed on top of cars .
Local governments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ smokescreen [ s ] ’ were being deployed to mask the city on enemy radar.
” Later experiments covered territory as wide-ranging as Ohio to Texas and Michigan to Kansas .
In 1965 , the government ’ s experiments in bioterror took aim at Washington ’ s National Airport , followed by a 1966 experiment in which army scientists exposed a million subway NYC passengers to airborne bacteria that causes food poisoning .
And this is the same government that has taken every bit of technology sold to us as being in our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ weapons , etc.—and used it against us , to track , control and trap us .
So , no , I don ’ t think the government ’ s ethics have changed much over the years .
It ’ s just taken its nefarious programs undercover .
The question remains : why is the government doing this ?
The answer is always the same : money , power and total domination .
It ’ s the same answer no matter which totalitarian regime is in power .
The mindset driving these programs has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Nazi doctors experimenting on Jews .
As the Holocaust Museum recounts , Nazi physicians “ conducted painful and often deadly experiments on thousands of concentration camp prisoners without their consent.
” The Nazi ’ s unethical experiments ran the gamut from freezing experiments using prisoners to find an effective treatment for hypothermia , tests to determine the maximum altitude for parachuting out of a plane , injecting prisoners with malaria , typhus , tuberculosis , typhoid fever , yellow fever , and infectious hepatitis , exposing prisoners to phosgene and mustard gas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ horrors being meted out against the American people can be traced back , in a direct line , to the horrors meted out in Nazi laboratories .
In fact , following the second World War , the U.S. government recruited many of Hitler ’ s employees , adopted his protocols , embraced his mindset about law and order and experimentation , and implemented his tactics in incremental steps .
Sounds far-fetched , you say ?
Read on .
It ’ s all documented .
As historian Robert Gellately recounts , the Nazi police @ @ @ @ @ @ @ efficiency and order by the world powers of the day that J. Edgar Hoover , then-head of the FBI , actually sent one of his right-hand men , Edmund Patrick Coffey , to Berlin in January 1938 at the invitation of Germany ’ s secret police , the Gestapo .
The FBI was so impressed with the Nazi regime that , according to the New York Times , in the decades after World War II , the FBI , along with other government agencies , aggressively recruited at least a thousand Nazis , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ henchmen .
All told , thousands of Nazi collaborators—including the head of a Nazi concentration camp , among others—were given secret visas and brought to America by way of Project Paperclip .
Subsequently , they were hired on as spies , informants and scientific advisers , and then camouflaged to ensure that their true identities and ties to Hitler ’ s holocaust machine would remain unknown .
All the while , thousands of Jewish refugees were refused entry visas to the U.S. on the grounds that it could threaten national securi Adding further @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been paying to keep these ex-Nazis on the U.S. government ’ s payroll ever since .
And in true Gestapo fashion , anyone who has dared to blow the whistle on the FBI ’ s illicit Nazi ties has found himself spied upon , intimidated , harassed and labeled a threat to national security .
As if the government ’ s covert , taxpayer-funded employment of Nazis after World War II wasn ’ t bad enough , U.S. government agencies—the FBI , CIA and the military—have since fully embraced many of the Nazi @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have used them repeatedly against American citizens .
It ’ s certainly easy to denounce the full-frontal horrors carried out by the scientific and medical community within a despotic regime such as Nazi Germany , but what do you do when it ’ s your own government that claims to be a champion of human rights all the while allowing its agents to engage in the foulest , bases and most despicable acts of torture , abuse and experimentation ?
When all is said and done , this is not a government that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This is not a government that values us .
Perhaps the answer lies in The Third Man , Carol Reed ’ s influential 1949 film starring Joseph Cotten and Orson Welles .
In the film , set in a post-WW II Vienna , rogue war profiteer Harry Lime has come to view human carnage with a callous indifference , unconcerned that the diluted penicillin he ’ s been trafficking underground has resulted in the tortured deaths of young children .
Challenged by his old friend Holly Martins to consider the consequences of his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these days , old man , nobody thinks in terms of human beings .
Governments don ’ t , so why should we ?
” “ Have you ever seen any of your victims ?
” asks Martins .
“ Victims ?
” responds Limes , as he looks down from the top of a Ferris wheel onto a populace reduced to mere dots on the ground .
“ Look down there .
Tell me .
Would you really feel any pity if one of those dots stopped moving forever ?
If I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dot that stopped , would you really , old man , tell me to keep my money , or would you calculate how many dots you could afford to spare ?
Free of income tax , old man .
Free of income tax — the only way you can save money nowadays.
” As I make clear in my book Battlefield America : The War on the American People , this is how the U.S. government sees us , too , when it looks down upon us from its lofty perch .
To @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are insignificant specks , faceless dots on the ground .
To the architects of the American police state , we are not worthy or vested with inherent rights .
This is how the government can justify treating us like economic units to be bought and sold and traded , or caged rats to be experimented upon and discarded when we ’ ve outgrown our usefulness .
To those who call the shots in the halls of government , “ we the people ” are merely the means to an end .
“ We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reason , who take a stand , who resist , who demand to be treated with dignity and care , who believe in freedom and justice for all—have become obsolete , undervalued citizens of a totalitarian state that , in the words of Rod Serling , “ has patterned itself after every dictator who has ever planted the ripping imprint of a boot on the pages of history since the beginning of time .
It has refinements , technological advances , and a more sophisticated approach to the destruction of human freedom.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Romney Wordsworth , the condemned man in Serling ’ s Twilight Zone episode “ The Obsolete Man.
” “ The Obsolete Man ” speaks to the dangers of a government that views people as expendable once they have outgrown their usefulness to the State .
Yet—and here ’ s the kicker—this is where the government through its monstrous inhumanity also becomes obsolete .
As Serling noted in his original script for “ The Obsolete Man , ” “ Any state , any entity , any ideology which fails to recognize the worth , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state is obsolete.
” How do you defeat a monster ?
You start by recognizing the monster for what it is .

“They were monsters with human faces, in crisp uniforms, marching in lockstep, so banal you don’t recognize them for what they are until it’s too late.” — Ransom Riggs, Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children
(TRI) — I have never known any government to put the best interests of its people first, and this COVID-19 pandemic is no exception.
Now this isn’t intended to be a debate over whether COVID-19 is a legitimate health crisis or a manufactured threat. Such crises can—and are—manipulated by governments in order to expand their powers. As such, it is possible for the virus to be both a genuine menace to public health and a menace to freedom.
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Yet we can’t afford to overlook the fact that governments the world over, including the U.S. government, have unleashed untold horrors upon the world in the name of global conquest, the acquisition of greater wealth, scientific experimentation, and technological advances, all packaged in the guise of the greater good.
While the U.S. government is currently looking into the possibility that the novel coronavirus spread from a Chinese laboratory rather than a market, the virus could just as easily have been created by the U.S. government or one of its allies.
After all, grisly experiments, barbaric behavior and inhumane conditions have become synonymous with the U.S. government, which has meted out untold horrors against humans and animals alike.
For instance, did you know that the U.S. government has been buying hundreds of dogs and cats from “Asian meat markets” as part of a gruesome experiment into food-borne illnesses?
The cannibalistic experiments involve killing cats and dogs purchased from Colombia, Brazil, Vietnam, China and Ethiopia, and then feeding the dead remains to laboratory kittens, bred in government laboratories for the express purpose of being infected with a disease and then killed.
It gets more gruesome.
The Department of Veterans Affairs has been removing parts of dogs’ brains to see how it affects their breathing; applying electrodes to dogs’ spinal cords (before and after severing them) to see how it impacts their cough reflexes; and implanting pacemakers in dogs’ hearts and then inducing them to have heart attacks (before draining their blood). All of the laboratory dogs are killed during the course of these experiments.
It’s not just animals that are being treated like lab rats by government agencies.
“We the people” have also become the police state’s guinea pigs: to be caged, branded, experimented upon without our knowledge or consent, and then conveniently discarded and left to suffer from the after-effects.
Back in 2017, FEMA “inadvertently” exposed nearly 10,000 firefighters, paramedics and other responders to a deadly form of ricin during simulated bioterrorism response sessions. In 2015, it was discovered that an Army lab had been “mistakenly” shipping deadly anthrax to labs and defense contractors for a decade.
While these particular incidents have been dismissed as “accidents,” you don’t have to dig very deep or go very back in the nation’s history to uncover numerous cases in which the government deliberately conducted secret experiments on an unsuspecting populace—citizens and noncitizens alike—making healthy people sick by spraying them with chemicals, injecting them with infectious diseases and exposing them to airborne toxins.
At the time, the government reasoned that it was legitimate to experiment on people who did not have full rights in society such as prisoners, mental patients, and poor blacks.
In Alabama, for example, 600 black men with syphilis were allowed to suffer without proper medical treatment in order to study the natural progression of untreated syphilis. In California, older prisoners had testicles from livestock and from recently executed convicts implanted in them to test their virility. In Connecticut, mental patients were injected with hepatitis.
In Maryland, sleeping prisoners had a pandemic flu virus sprayed up their noses. In Georgia, two dozen “volunteering” prison inmates had gonorrhea bacteria pumped directly into their urinary tracts through the penis. In Michigan, male patients at an insane asylum were exposed to the flu after first being injected with an experimental flu vaccine. In Minnesota, 11 public service employee “volunteers” were injected with malaria, then starved for five days.
You Might Like
In New York, dying patients had cancer cells introduced into their systems. In Ohio, over 100 inmates were injected with live cancer cells. Also in New York, prisoners at a reformatory prison were also split into two groups to determine how a deadly stomach virus was spread: the first group was made to swallow an unfiltered stool suspension, while the second group merely breathed in germs sprayed into the air. And in Staten Island, children with mental retardation were given hepatitis orally and by injection to see if they could then be cured.
As the Associated Press reports, “The late 1940s and 1950s saw huge growth in the U.S. pharmaceutical and health care industries, accompanied by a boom in prisoner experiments funded by both the government and corporations. By the 1960s, at least half the states allowed prisoners to be used as medical guinea pigs … because they were cheaper than chimpanzees.”
Moreover, “Some of these studies, mostly from the 1940s to the ’60s, apparently were never covered by news media. Others were reported at the time, but the focus was on the promise of enduring new cures, while glossing over how test subjects were treated.”
Media blackouts, propaganda, spin. Sound familiar?
How many government incursions into our freedoms have been blacked out, buried under “entertainment” news headlines, or spun in such a way as to suggest that anyone voicing a word of caution is paranoid or conspiratorial?
Unfortunately, these incidents are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the atrocities the government has inflicted on an unsuspecting populace in the name of secret experimentation.
For instance, there was the U.S. military’s secret race-based testing of mustard gas on more than 60,000 enlisted men. As NPR reports, “All of the World War II experiments with mustard gas were done in secret and weren’t recorded on the subjects’ official military records. Most do not have proof of what they went through. They received no follow-up health care or monitoring of any kind. And they were sworn to secrecy about the tests under threat of dishonorable discharge and military prison time, leaving some unable to receive adequate medical treatment for their injuries, because they couldn’t tell doctors what happened to them.”
And then there was the CIA’s MKULTRA program in which hundreds of unsuspecting American civilians and military personnel were dosed with LSD, some having the hallucinogenic drug slipped into their drinks at the beach, in city bars, at restaurants. As Time reports, “before the documentation and other facts of the program were made public, those who talked of it were frequently dismissed as being psychotic.”
Now one might argue that this is all ancient history and that the government today is different from the government of yesteryear, but has the U.S. government really changed?
Has the government become any more humane, any more respectful of the rights of the citizenry?
Has it become any more transparent or willing to abide by the rule of law? Has it become any more truthful about its activities? Has it become any more cognizant of its appointed role as a guardian of our rights?
Or has the government simply hunkered down and hidden its nefarious acts and dastardly experiments under layers of secrecy, legalism and obfuscations? Has it not become wilier, more slippery, more difficult to pin down?
Having mastered the Orwellian art of Doublespeak and followed the Huxleyan blueprint for distraction and diversion, are we not dealing with a government that is simply craftier and more conniving that it used to be?
Consider this: after revelations about the government’s experiments spanning the 20th century spawned outrage, the government began looking for human guinea pigs in other countries, where “clinical trials could be done more cheaply and with fewer rules.”
In Guatemala, prisoners and patients at a mental hospital were infected with syphilis, “apparently to test whether penicillin could prevent some sexually transmitted disease.” In Uganda, U.S.-funded doctors “failed to give the AIDS drug AZT to all the HIV-infected pregnant women in a study… even though it would have protected their newborns.” Meanwhile, in Nigeria, children with meningitis were used to test an antibiotic named Trovan. Eleven children died and many others were left disabled.
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
Case in point: back in 2016, it was announced that scientists working for the Department of Homeland Security would begin releasing various gases and particles on crowded subway platforms as part of an experiment aimed at testing bioterror airflow in New York subways.
The government insisted that the gases released into the subways by the DHS were nontoxic and did not pose a health risk. It’s in our best interests, they said, to understand how quickly a chemical or biological terrorist attack might spread. And look how cool the technology is—said the government cheerleaders—that scientists can use something called DNATrax to track the movement of microscopic substances in air and food. (Imagine the kinds of surveillance that could be carried out by the government using trackable airborne microscopic substances you breathe in or ingest.)
Mind you, this is the same government that in 1949 sprayed bacteria into the Pentagon’s air handling system, then the world’s largest office building. In 1950, special ops forces sprayed bacteria from Navy ships off the coast of Norfolk and San Francisco, in the latter case exposing all of the city’s 800,000 residents.
In 1953, government operatives staged “mock” anthrax attacks on St. Louis, Minneapolis, and Winnipeg using generators placed on top of cars. Local governments were reportedly told that “‘invisible smokescreen[s]’ were being deployed to mask the city on enemy radar.” Later experiments covered territory as wide-ranging as Ohio to Texas and Michigan to Kansas.
In 1965, the government’s experiments in bioterror took aim at Washington’s National Airport, followed by a 1966 experiment in which army scientists exposed a million subway NYC passengers to airborne bacteria that causes food poisoning.
And this is the same government that has taken every bit of technology sold to us as being in our best interests—GPS devices, surveillance, nonlethal weapons, etc.—and used it against us, to track, control and trap us.
So, no, I don’t think the government’s ethics have changed much over the years. It’s just taken its nefarious programs undercover.
The question remains: why is the government doing this? The answer is always the same: money, power and total domination.
It’s the same answer no matter which totalitarian regime is in power.
The mindset driving these programs has, appropriately, been likened to that of Nazi doctors experimenting on Jews. As the Holocaust Museum recounts, Nazi physicians “conducted painful and often deadly experiments on thousands of concentration camp prisoners without their consent.”
The Nazi’s unethical experiments ran the gamut from freezing experiments using prisoners to find an effective treatment for hypothermia, tests to determine the maximum altitude for parachuting out of a plane, injecting prisoners with malaria, typhus, tuberculosis, typhoid fever, yellow fever, and infectious hepatitis, exposing prisoners to phosgene and mustard gas, and mass sterilization experiments.
The horrors being meted out against the American people can be traced back, in a direct line, to the horrors meted out in Nazi laboratories. In fact, following the second World War, the U.S. government recruited many of Hitler’s employees, adopted his protocols, embraced his mindset about law and order and experimentation, and implemented his tactics in incremental steps.
Sounds far-fetched, you say? Read on. It’s all documented.
As historian Robert Gellately recounts, the Nazi police state was initially so admired for its efficiency and order by the world powers of the day that J. Edgar Hoover, then-head of the FBI, actually sent one of his right-hand men, Edmund Patrick Coffey, to Berlin in January 1938 at the invitation of Germany’s secret police, the Gestapo.
The FBI was so impressed with the Nazi regime that, according to the New York Times, in the decades after World War II, the FBI, along with other government agencies, aggressively recruited at least a thousand Nazis, including some of Hitler’s highest henchmen.
All told, thousands of Nazi collaborators—including the head of a Nazi concentration camp, among others—were given secret visas and brought to America by way of Project Paperclip. Subsequently, they were hired on as spies, informants and scientific advisers, and then camouflaged to ensure that their true identities and ties to Hitler’s holocaust machine would remain unknown. All the while, thousands of Jewish refugees were refused entry visas to the U.S. on the grounds that it could threaten national securi
Adding further insult to injury, American taxpayers have been paying to keep these ex-Nazis on the U.S. government’s payroll ever since. And in true Gestapo fashion, anyone who has dared to blow the whistle on the FBI’s illicit Nazi ties has found himself spied upon, intimidated, harassed and labeled a threat to national security.
As if the government’s covert, taxpayer-funded employment of Nazis after World War II wasn’t bad enough, U.S. government agencies—the FBI, CIA and the military—have since fully embraced many of the Nazi’s well-honed policing tactics, and have used them repeatedly against American citizens.
It’s certainly easy to denounce the full-frontal horrors carried out by the scientific and medical community within a despotic regime such as Nazi Germany, but what do you do when it’s your own government that claims to be a champion of human rights all the while allowing its agents to engage in the foulest, bases and most despicable acts of torture, abuse and experimentation?
When all is said and done, this is not a government that has our best interests at heart.
This is not a government that values us.
Perhaps the answer lies in The Third Man, Carol Reed’s influential 1949 film starring Joseph Cotten and Orson Welles. In the film, set in a post-WW II Vienna, rogue war profiteer Harry Lime has come to view human carnage with a callous indifference, unconcerned that the diluted penicillin he’s been trafficking underground has resulted in the tortured deaths of young children.
Challenged by his old friend Holly Martins to consider the consequences of his actions, Lime responds, “In these days, old man, nobody thinks in terms of human beings. Governments don’t, so why should we?”
“Have you ever seen any of your victims?” asks Martins.
“Victims?” responds Limes, as he looks down from the top of a Ferris wheel onto a populace reduced to mere dots on the ground. “Look down there. Tell me. Would you really feel any pity if one of those dots stopped moving forever? If I offered you twenty thousand pounds for every dot that stopped, would you really, old man, tell me to keep my money, or would you calculate how many dots you could afford to spare? Free of income tax, old man. Free of income tax — the only way you can save money nowadays.”
As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, this is how the U.S. government sees us, too, when it looks down upon us from its lofty perch.
To the powers-that-be, the rest of us are insignificant specks, faceless dots on the ground.
To the architects of the American police state, we are not worthy or vested with inherent rights. This is how the government can justify treating us like economic units to be bought and sold and traded, or caged rats to be experimented upon and discarded when we’ve outgrown our usefulness.
To those who call the shots in the halls of government, “we the people” are merely the means to an end.
“We the people”—who think, who reason, who take a stand, who resist, who demand to be treated with dignity and care, who believe in freedom and justice for all—have become obsolete, undervalued citizens of a totalitarian state that, in the words of Rod Serling, “has patterned itself after every dictator who has ever planted the ripping imprint of a boot on the pages of history since the beginning of time. It has refinements, technological advances, and a more sophisticated approach to the destruction of human freedom.”
In this sense, we are all Romney Wordsworth, the condemned man in Serling’s Twilight Zone episode “The Obsolete Man.”
“The Obsolete Man” speaks to the dangers of a government that views people as expendable once they have outgrown their usefulness to the State. Yet—and here’s the kicker—this is where the government through its monstrous inhumanity also becomes obsolete. As Serling noted in his original script for “The Obsolete Man,” “Any state, any entity, any ideology which fails to recognize the worth, the dignity, the rights of Man…that state is obsolete.”
How do you defeat a monster? You start by recognizing the monster for what it is.