wakingtimes--2020-01-03--Chemtrails Exposed: The Common Roots of the New Manhattan Project and the Theory of Man-Made Global

As it turns out , both the New Manhattan Project and the theory of man-made global warming share many important , early historical roots .
Both came from a group of Swedish scientists active during the late 1800s and early 1900s .
These scientists were members of something called the Stockholm Physics Society .
The founder and main attraction of this group was a man by the name of Svante Arrhenius ( 1859-1927 ) .
Svante Arrhenius was the scientist who originally came up with the theory of man-made global warming and he did it during his time with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Stockholm Physics Society ’ s work pertaining to plasma physics , atomic physics , meteorology , atmospheric electricity , and weather modification also provide compelling links to today ’ s global weather modification project the author appropriately calls the New Manhattan Project .
This article is mostly based upon a biography of Svante Arrhenius by Elisabeth Crawford titled Arrhenius : From Ionic Theory to the Greenhouse Effect .
Oddly enough , this book was published in 1996 ; the same year that large-scale domestic spraying operations began .
For more about the New @ @ @ @ @ @ @ author ’ s book Chemtrails Exposed : A New Manhattan Project , available exclusively at Amazon .
Svante Arrhenius was a Swedish scientist who was the first person to significantly assert and popularize the theory of man-made climate change .
Although Arrhenius is not very well known today , in his time he was considered Sweden ’ s most prominent scientist ; receiving a slew of honorary doctorates from the most prestigious universities in Europe as well as a large heap of exclusive awards and medals including the 1903 Nobel prize for chemistry @ @ @ @ @ @ @ languages .
Arrhenius worked in his native Swedish as well as in the German , English , and French languages , with German being the most predominant .
He often published in all four languages .
Crawford notes that , “ His closest working relationships were with members of the German , English , and , later , American scientific communities.
” He was quite gregarious and had hundreds of scientist friends in Europe and North America .
Arrhenius was born on February 19 , 1859 near the city of Uppsala , Sweden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a noble family called the von Essens .
Soon after his birth , his family moved into a house inside the city of Uppsala proper .
This was where Arrhenius spent his childhood and youth .
Arrhenius was admitted to Uppsala University in 1876 where he concentrated on his studies of mathematics , physics , and chemistry .
The University of Uppsala , founded in 1477 , is Sweden ’ s oldest and Arrhenius ’ father was an employee of the university .
In 1881 , Arrhenius followed his professor Otto Petterson to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the new Stockholm Högskola for three years .
The Stockholm Högskola had opened in 1878 as a private , non-degree-granting institution of higher learning oriented toward the sciences .
These three years at the Högskola set Arrhenius ’ work on the course he was to follow for the next decade .
In Stockholm , Arrhenius also studied at the Institute of Physics of the Swedish Academy of Sciences under Erik Edlund ( 1819-1888 ) .
Sweden ’ s Central Meteorological Office was located at the Institute of Physics and until the early @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had been in charge of weather observations there .
Undoubtedly at the behest of Edlund , it was during his time at the Academy that Arrhenius made his first serious excursion into the atmospheric sciences and , even more pertinently , his first serious excursion into the field of atmospheric electricity with a paper on the topic of ball lightning published in the Academy proceedings .
Arrhenius began to move within a broad network of European scientists that was centered on the Committee on Electrolysis of the British Association for the Advancement of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was headed by the noted physicist Sir Oliver Lodge ( 1851-1940 ) .
Sir Oliver Lodge was the main European pioneer in the field of electrostatic precipitation and , as readers of this work already know , the field of electrostatic precipitation is central to the New Manhattan Project .
For more about the history and current relevance of electrostatic precipitation , please see the author ’ s previous articles “ Chemtrails Exposed : Dresser Industries and the New Manhattan Project ” as well as “ Chemtrails Exposed : The Research Corporation for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ New Manhattan Project.
” Arrhenius eventually established a lively academic discourse with Lodge .
The two conversed mostly about early plasma physics .
Although they didn ’ t call it that yet , plasma physics is another field with direct relevance to today ’ s New Manhattan Project mainly due to the fact that ionospheric plasmas are today being manipulated by ground-based antennas known as ionospheric heaters .
Although they were not fast friends , the famous scientist Max Planck ( 1858-1947 ) was also one of Arrhenius ’ contemporaries .
Arrhenius was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ atomic physics .
This is relevant to our investigation for the fact that today ’ s New Manhattan Project is an outgrowth of the original Manhattan Project ; which was all about atomic physics .
For more about how this happened , please refer to the author ’ s previous article “ Chemtrails Exposed : Truly a New Manhattan Project.
” Arrhenius later became a student of radioactivity in 1909 when he was taught by the famous , pioneering atomic physicist Ernest Rutherford ( 1871-1937 ) at the University of Manchester .
After @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Sweden in 1891 to find that a new culture had swept the nation .
This new , emergent culture appears to have been somewhat similar to that which emerged in America in the late 1960s .
It was marked by individual introspection , communion with the natural world , and political progressivism .
This new culture was largely centered around a small elite in Stockholm which expressed itself through art , literature , and science .
Social Darwinism played a central role in the philosophy of this new cultural movement .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sweden even had its own dialect known as ‘ New Swedish.
’ Also upon his return , Arrhenius became a teacher of physics at the Stockholm Högskola .
In 1893 Arrhenius was joined at the Högskola by Vilhelm Bjerknes ( 1862-1951 ) .
The two went on to become good friends and colleagues .
The presence of Vilhelm Bjerknes is significant to our investigation because he went on to identify the basic equations of atmospheric dynamics which eventually paved the way for today ’ s computerized atmospheric modeling .
Bjerknes had studied under @ @ @ @ @ @ @ University of Bonn .
His doctoral dissertation was about experimental investigations of Hertzian waves .
Hertz is the father of the study of electromagnetic energy , which plays a key role in the NMP .
His generalized theorems of atmospheric circulation were based on analogies between hydrodynamic and electromagnetic forces .
The Swedish meteorological establishment had extensive ties to the Stockholm Högskola and Arrhenius .
The first director of Sweden ’ s Central Meteorological Office , a man by the name of Robert Rubenson , was a professor of physics at the Högskola @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Meteorological Office meteorologist by the name of Nils Ekholm ( 1848-1923 ) became one of Arrhenius ’ closest collaborators .
In the fall of 1891 , Arrhenius initiated the Stockholm Physics Society as a forum for lectures and discussion pertaining to the latest advances in physics .
In the context of this new Society , physics was defined broadly as comprising neighboring fields such as meteorology , geophysics , astrophysics , and physical chemistry .
The fortnightly meetings of this new Society were held at the Physics Institute of the Stockholm Högskola .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hasselberg was elected president , the aforementioned Otto Petterson became vice-president , and Arrhenius became secretary .
This new Society was immediately well attended .
The aforementioned Robert Rubenson and Nils Ekholm attended the meetings as well a third man associated with the Central Meteorological Office by the name of Hugo Hamburg .
The Stockholm Physics Society was more like a social debating club rather than a serious scientific institution .
The largest number of lectures at this new Stockholm Physics Society meeting at the Stockholm Högskola concerned the physics of the Earth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This area of study was known as ‘ cosmic physics.
’ Early on , most of the lectures on cosmic physics were given by Arrhenius himself .
Cosmic physics is of direct applicability to today ’ s New Manhattan Project because modification or control of the earth ’ s weather must take into consideration not only the physics of the atmosphere , but all environmental factors .
Although Arrhenius probably first heard of cosmic physics during his time studying abroad in Germany , where it had been institutionalized , the variety of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ late 1800s and early 1900s was substantially different than that which was practiced in Germany .
The German cosmic physicists served as counterparts to the Swedish cosmic physicists .
This was not Arrhenius ’ first work in the subject .
Years earlier , in 1888 , Arrhenius had studied atmospheric electricity ; an aspect of cosmic physics .
He analyzed measurements of atmospheric electricity as well as other meteorological data in order to understand the influence of ultraviolet light from the sun on the conductivity of the air .
This was all in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ particles ( ions ) in the earth ’ s electric field and dispersion of electricity in the atmosphere .
Arrhenius ’ early in this subject has the New Manhattan Project written all over it .
At the Stockholm Physics Society , Arrhenius also reported on his continuing work in the area of atomic physics .
Other members offered information on topics with relevance to the New Manhattan Project such as aeronautics .
The members of the Stockholm Physics Society shared not only a consuming interest in physics , but they also shared a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of their times in that they were politically progressive .
Conversely , members of the progressive political parties of the time were also scientists .
With the influence of these predominant political views surrounding him , Arrhenius became a progressive himself .
Crawford writes : This over-arching theme of political progressivism is of note to our discussion because , as we will soon see , it was during this period of his work with the politically progressive scientists of the Stockholm Physics Society , that Arrhenius first developed the theory of man-made climate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this day , is marked by political progressivism .
And the theory of man-made climate change is relevant to the New Manhattan Project because today ’ s geoengineers use the theory of catastrophic man-made global warming as an excuse for dumping tens of thousands of megatons of toxic materials from aircraft ANNUALLY – a key aspect of today ’ s New Manhattan Project .
Could the theory of catastrophic man-made global warming have more to do with politics than science ?
That ’ s not what the Old Media said .
Please read @ @ @ @ @ @ @ found a receptive audience in the press .
Arrhenius in particular was regularly published for his reporting upon the Society ’ s meetings .
He found the local press to be eager to publish his articles and pay him a fee for his troubles .
This is consistent with today ’ s mass media which overwhelmingly produces content from politically progressive sources .
Arrhenius provided the local media with a steady stream of his work , including a piece on the means to artificially produce rainfall .
Yes , that ’ s right @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – a field with only the most direct relevance to today ’ s New Manhattan Project .
Arrhenius ’ participation in the media continued for many years .
He became an important popularizer of science .
In the early 1900s , he had many popular books published on topics such as cosmic physics .
To this day , one can order his books online .
His most popular book was published in 1908 and was titled Worlds in the Making .
Cosmic physics at the Stockholm Physics Society flourished throughout the 1890s .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ in data collection as well as advances in theoretical and experimental physics .
Arrhenius was the main promoter of cosmic physics in Stockholm .
He worked almost exclusively in cosmic physics from the mid 1890s to the first few years of the new century .
It was from this work in cosmic physics that Arrhenius first began to postulate about atmospheric carbon dioxide and its effect on earth ’ s temperature .
Almost exactly 100 years before large-scale , domestic spraying operations began , Arrhenius began his investigations of atmospheric carbon dioxide at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The idea of linking variations in atmospheric carbon dioxide to climate change came to Arrhenius near the end of 1894 .
He started work on the notion on Christmas Eve , 1894 .
His first articles on the subject were published exactly one year later .
Interestingly , 1895 was a year of emotional turmoil for Arrhenius .
In that year , his first marriage dissolved , his chair in physics at the Högskola seemed in jeopardy , and his son was born .
Both Arrhenius and Bjerknes worked on the issue .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ this area as well .
Högbom ’ s contributions consisted of ‘ guesstimates ’ of the amount of CO2 contributed to the atmosphere by different means .
Specifically , Arrhenius ’ investigation pertained to atmospheric carbon dioxide ’ s influence upon the coming and passing of Ice Ages .
Arrhenius warned that our present existence may be , “ nothing but a short flourishing of civilization between two Ice Ages.
” Although Arrhenius is not referenced , it is interesting to note that in 1997 LLNL scientists Teller , Wood , and Hyde @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Warming and Ice Ages : Prospects for Physics-Based Modulation of Global Change ” wherein the authors suggest that saturating the upper atmosphere with small aluminum particles could avert the next ice age .
In all honesty , there was one other scientist who had previously postulated that levels of atmospheric CO2 could have an effect upon climate .
In 1861 England ’ s John Tyndall ( 1820-1893 ) suggested as much .
But Arrhenius is more notable here because he produced a model in attempts to prove it and he popularized the theory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Arrhenius ’ assertions about atmospheric CO2 having a warming effect upon earth ’ s climate were based upon the so-called ‘ greenhouse effect ’ of atmospheric vapors first postulated by Joseph Fourier ( 1768-1830 ) in 1824 .
The major difference here is that Fourier did not specify CO2 .
Although the term ‘ greenhouse effect ’ did not come into use until much later , it was probably Arrhenius who first used the hothouse metaphor .
In America , Arrhenius ’ theories about atmospheric carbon dioxide were further investigated by geologist Thomas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ founded and funded University of Chicago .
It was not until the 1970s that the theory of man-made global climate change began gaining large-scale popular traction in America .
Immediately after entertaining Arrhenius ’ theories of man-made global warming , the Stockholm Physics Society largely concerned itself with Bjerknes ’ circulation theorem as it pertained to meteorological problems .
Arrhenius did not take a significant role in these proceedings .
Arrhenius , instead , went on to study cosmic physics more broadly , including the atmospheric electricity which is so central to today @ @ @ @ @ @ @ went on to write extensively about atmospheric electricity .
The second volume of his 1903 book Lehrbuch der kosmischen Physik was all about the physics of the atmosphere and atmospheric electricity .
Following Arrhenius ’ early significant work on the subject , the next major development in the saga of the theory of man-made climate change didn ’ t come until 1955 when Fortune magazine published an article written by the famous Manhattan Project scientist John von Neumann titled “ Can We Survive Technology ?
” Von Neumann ’ s article ushered in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he suggested that we could employ Solar Radiation Management geoengineering in order to save ourselves from the catastrophic effects of atmospheric temperature fluctuations .
For more about von Neumann ’ s groundbreaking 1955 article , please refer to the author ’ s 2017 article “ Can We Survive Technology ?
The Origin of SRM Geoengineering and the Modern Theory of Man-made Global Warming.
” It is interesting to note that in the late 1800s , at the same time Arrhenius was developing the earliest , significant work on the theory of man-made global @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was making its first inroads into Sweden as well .
Arrhenius ’ first wife was enamored with it .
In Rodney Howard-Browne and Paul L. Williams ’ 2018 book The Killing of Uncle Sam , the authors note how a key founding member of something called the Society of the Elect named William Stead was a disciple of Theosophy .
This Society of the Elect went on to branch off into the Roundtable Movement , the Committee of 300 and many other powerful organizations .
It branched off into the groups that have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the course of Humanity .
Coupled with the fact that the theory of man-made climate change has been popularly used as a determinant factor for the course of Humanity , a further examination of Theosophy is warranted here .
Stead wrote that his Society of the Elect was to , “ chart the course of events that would culminate in a New World Order.
” According to Stead , the Pilgrim Societies , the Round Table , the Royal Institute of International Affairs , the Council on Foreign Relations , the Bank of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the Trilateral Commission are all offshoots of the Society of the Elect .
Theosophists such as Stead were devil worshippers .
In her book The Secret Doctrine , lead Theosophist Helena Blavatsky wrote , “ Demon est Deus inversus : that is to say , through every point of Infinite Space thrill the magnetic and electrical currents of animate Nature , the life-giving and death-giving waves , for death on earth becomes life on another plane .
Lucifer is devine and terrestrial light , the ‘ Holy Ghost ’ and ’ Satan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time… ” Thomas Edison , Adolph Hitler , and FDR ’ s vice-president Henry Wallace , among many other notables , were all disciples of Blavatsky .
Edison has very serious implications for the New Manhattan Project as his General Electric went on to roll-out the scientific era of weather modification in 1946 and produce lots of applicable technology .
Strangely enough , in the early 1900s Arrhenius made it all the way to California .
Once here , among other , more touristy destinations , he visited Wallace Campbell ’ s ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Jacques Loeb ’ s ( 1859-1924 ) marine biology station in Pacific Grove , as well as the campus of UC Berkeley .
For the fee of $ 1K ( about $ 28K in today ’ s money ) , Arrhenius gave lectures during Berkeley ’ s 1904 summer session .
Loeb was a professor at Berkeley and during this time , Arrhenius lodged with the Loeb family at their house .
At Berkeley , Arrhenius formed lasting professional relationships with other Berkeley scientists .
In particular , Arrhenius formed a lasting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Campbell was the director of the Lick Observatory , Arrhenius shared his interest in cosmic physics .
In fact , in 1905 , Arrhenius and his colleague from the Högskola , mathematician and amateur astronomer Gustav Kobb joined the Lick Observatory eclipse expedition to Alhambra , Spain .
Berkeley botanist Winthrop Osterhout ( 1871-1964 ) also became a lifelong friend and correspondent .
Osterhout brought Arrhenius to the Bohemian Club clubhouse in downtown San Francisco as well as to their annual summer retreat at their Bohemian Grove encampment on the banks of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The Bohemian Club and their Bohemian Grove are of interest to our investigation of the New Manhattan Project for quite a few reasons .
Many famous scientists who have connections to the New Manhattan Project have been Bohemian Club members including Ernest Lawrence ( 1901-1958 ) .
The Stanford Research Institute ( SRI ) , which has firm implications for the New Manhattan Project , was originally organized by three members at the Bohemian Grove in 1945 .
Also , in the early 1940s , the plans for the original Manhattan Project @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Lastly , it is interesting and relevant to our investigation to note that , during his time at and around UC Berkeley , Arrhenius most probably met Frederick Gardner Cottrell ( 1877-1948 ) ; a key figure in the historical development of the New Manhattan Project .
Cottrell was the American pioneer in the field of electrostatic precipitation and founded something called the Research Corporation for Science Advancement ( RCSA ) .
At the time of Arrhenius ’ visit , Cottrell was teaching physical chemistry at Berkeley , a subject in which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ California trip , Arrhenius went back to his native country .
In the fall of 1924 , Arrhenius suffered a stroke from which he never recovered .
Three years later , he died and was buried in the town cemetery of Uppsala , Sweden .
Although Arrhenius is the putative originator of the theory of man-made global warming , pertaining to this , he really originated nothing .
Arrhenius ’ work here was unscientific from the beginning .
He first had the idea that changes in amounts of atmospheric CO2 had an effect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ model to prove it .
The proper way to conduct science is to simply conduct experiments and see what happens .
Arrhenius ’ work here was contrary to the scientific method and mathematical models are inherently of seriously questionable scientific validity .
For more about the philosophies behind proper scientific methods and practices , please refer to Marvin Herndon ’ s excellent books Maverick ’ s Earth and Universe as well as Herndon ’ s Earth and the Dark Side of Science .
Arrhenius ’ models were based on what amounts to wild @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the vast amounts of data needed to confirm his grand assertions .
Networks for the collection of the necessary data did not exist at the time .
His work in this area relied simply upon guesstimates and contributions from his peers ; not any real empirical data .
He was in way over his head and thus , his work in this area holds no validity whatsoever .
The entire notion that increases in atmospheric CO2 causes an increase in average global temperature , which is what Arrhenius was asserting , is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science , climatologist Dr. Timothy Ball writes that an increase in the earth ’ s average global temperature is ALWAYS FOLLOWED by an increase in atmospheric CO2 – not the other way around .
Dr. Ball specifies that the only place where an increase in atmospheric CO2 is followed by an increase in the earth ’ s average temperature is in the leading alarmist climate models emanating from the United Nations .
Gaping hole after gaping hole can be punched ( and has been punched ) through the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will probably be writing another book .
The science was unsound then and it is unsound now .
Nevertheless , the political left of the time picked it up and ran with it then and the political left continues to run with it today .
Today they do so because the agendas associated with it are the agendas of today ’ s mainstream , mass media-influenced , lowest common denominator , political left .
The establishment wants to sell you on : big government , crony capitalism , deindustrialization , and centralized control @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that all leftists are stupid and/or ignorant .
Many on the political left see right through the theory of man-made global warming and are really great people .
Disclaimers aside , let us continue .
It is undeniable that gigantic socio-economic agendas are attached to the theory of man-made global climate change .
This agenda is exemplified by the Green New Deal .
From the proposed legislation presented on congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ’ s website , we see that , because of catastrophic man-made global warming , we are supposed to : transition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all existing buildings , eliminate greenhouse gas emissions , overhaul transportation systems , reconstruct labor laws , and oh so much more .
And , by the way , please don ’ t forget how geoengineers say they want to spray us with tens of thousands of megatons of toxic materials in order to save us from the dreaded climate change .
We should not be burdened with an unbelievably vast , expensive , and cruel socio-economic agenda by those of a particular political bias which has served to corrupt the underlying reason @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the first place .
It is not a coincidence that the political left was pushing it then and the political left is pushing it now .
The demonstrated , inherent , historical and current political bias inextricably intertwined with the theory of man-made global warming pushes any honest , objective search for truth out of the realm of possibilities .
Our justice system provides a good example .
Would you want a detective , who you know hates your guts , investigating you ?
No .
It would only be a fair @ @ @ @ @ @ @ detective was impartial .
Any significant bias on the part of the investigator would almost assuredly result in some imbalance ( s ) later on in the proceedings .
The lack of objectivity pertaining to the theory of man-made global warming relegates the theory solely to the realm of political ideology and nothing else .
The former chairman of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Meteorology Department , Richard Lindzen said it best when he said words to the effect that the theory of man-made global warming is about money , politics , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just the beginning of more gigantic investigations .
What has been excavated here is just a small portion of something much larger .
So , what happened to this group of Swedish scientists ?
Did their descendants , descendant organizations , and/or disciples go on to have anything to do with the New Manhattan Project ?
We know what has become of their theory of man-made global warming .
Did their descendants , biological or otherwise , continue with the global warming nonsense ?
This apparently is the case .
When one considers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this paper such as : the theory of man-made climate change , the extreme political left , and Theosophy , one begins to make out a history of how we got to where we are now .
One begins to see how the establishment uses the political left to accomplish their objectives .
Yes , we all know that the political right has their problems , too ; with all the imperialistic war mongering and such .
That is all very well documented .
But the dysfunction of the political left tends to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ international tyranny and is more difficult to see because it is not as well documented .
As exemplified again here by Arrhenius ’ successful media forays , the political left has historically dominated media ; the inadequacies of the political left are therefore not as well documented due to lack of self-introspection common in our society and not limited to the political left .
PeterAKirby.com My Minds page My Steemit page My GoodReads page My YouTube channel Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael , CA author and activist .
Check out the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ebook Chemtrails Exposed .
It ’ s still only 99¢ , but not for long .

Chemtrails Exposed: The Common Roots of the New Manhattan Project and the Theory of Man-Made Global Warming
Peter A. Kirby, Contributor
Waking Times
As Archimedes declared… “Eureka!”
As it turns out, both the New Manhattan Project and the theory of man-made global warming share many important, early historical roots. Both came from a group of Swedish scientists active during the late 1800s and early 1900s.
These scientists were members of something called the Stockholm Physics Society. The founder and main attraction of this group was a man by the name of Svante Arrhenius (1859-1927). Svante Arrhenius was the scientist who originally came up with the theory of man-made global warming and he did it during his time with the Stockholm Physics Society.
Arrhenius and the Stockholm Physics Society’s work pertaining to plasma physics, atomic physics, meteorology, atmospheric electricity, and weather modification also provide compelling links to today’s global weather modification project the author appropriately calls the New Manhattan Project.
This article is mostly based upon a biography of Svante Arrhenius by Elisabeth Crawford titled Arrhenius: From Ionic Theory to the Greenhouse Effect. Oddly enough, this book was published in 1996; the same year that large-scale domestic spraying operations began.
For more about the New Manhattan Project, please refer to the author’s book Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project, available exclusively at Amazon.
Svante Arrhenius
Svante Arrhenius was a Swedish scientist who was the first person to significantly assert and popularize the theory of man-made climate change.
Although Arrhenius is not very well known today, in his time he was considered Sweden’s most prominent scientist; receiving a slew of honorary doctorates from the most prestigious universities in Europe as well as a large heap of exclusive awards and medals including the 1903 Nobel prize for chemistry. He worked internationally and in multiple languages.
Arrhenius worked in his native Swedish as well as in the German, English, and French languages, with German being the most predominant. He often published in all four languages. Crawford notes that, “His closest working relationships were with members of the German, English, and, later, American scientific communities.” He was quite gregarious and had hundreds of scientist friends in Europe and North America.
Arrhenius was born on February 19, 1859 near the city of Uppsala, Sweden. His father was the agent for a noble family called the von Essens. Soon after his birth, his family moved into a house inside the city of Uppsala proper. This was where Arrhenius spent his childhood and youth.
Arrhenius was admitted to Uppsala University in 1876 where he concentrated on his studies of mathematics, physics, and chemistry. The University of Uppsala, founded in 1477, is Sweden’s oldest and Arrhenius’ father was an employee of the university.
In 1881, Arrhenius followed his professor Otto Petterson to the capital city of Stockholm to study at the new Stockholm Högskola for three years. The Stockholm Högskola had opened in 1878 as a private, non-degree-granting institution of higher learning oriented toward the sciences. These three years at the Högskola set Arrhenius’ work on the course he was to follow for the next decade.
In Stockholm, Arrhenius also studied at the Institute of Physics of the Swedish Academy of Sciences under Erik Edlund (1819-1888). Sweden’s Central Meteorological Office was located at the Institute of Physics and until the early 1870s, Arrhenius’ mentor, Edlund had been in charge of weather observations there. Undoubtedly at the behest of Edlund, it was during his time at the Academy that Arrhenius made his first serious excursion into the atmospheric sciences and, even more pertinently, his first serious excursion into the field of atmospheric electricity with a paper on the topic of ball lightning published in the Academy proceedings.
Arrhenius began to move within a broad network of European scientists that was centered on the Committee on Electrolysis of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (BAAS). The BAAS was headed by the noted physicist Sir Oliver Lodge (1851-1940). Sir Oliver Lodge was the main European pioneer in the field of electrostatic precipitation and, as readers of this work already know, the field of electrostatic precipitation is central to the New Manhattan Project.
For more about the history and current relevance of electrostatic precipitation, please see the author’s previous articles “Chemtrails Exposed: Dresser Industries and the New Manhattan Project” as well as “Chemtrails Exposed: The Research Corporation for Science Advancement and the Origins of the New Manhattan Project.”
Arrhenius eventually established a lively academic discourse with Lodge. The two conversed mostly about early plasma physics. Although they didn’t call it that yet, plasma physics is another field with direct relevance to today’s New Manhattan Project mainly due to the fact that ionospheric plasmas are today being manipulated by ground-based antennas known as ionospheric heaters.
Although they were not fast friends, the famous scientist Max Planck (1858-1947) was also one of Arrhenius’ contemporaries.
Arrhenius was also involved in the field of early atomic physics. This is relevant to our investigation for the fact that today’s New Manhattan Project is an outgrowth of the original Manhattan Project; which was all about atomic physics. For more about how this happened, please refer to the author’s previous article “Chemtrails Exposed: Truly a New Manhattan Project.”
Arrhenius later became a student of radioactivity in 1909 when he was taught by the famous, pioneering atomic physicist Ernest Rutherford (1871-1937) at the University of Manchester.
After studying abroad in Germany, Arrhenius returned to Sweden in 1891 to find that a new culture had swept the nation. This new, emergent culture appears to have been somewhat similar to that which emerged in America in the late 1960s. It was marked by individual introspection, communion with the natural world, and political progressivism. This new culture was largely centered around a small elite in Stockholm which expressed itself through art, literature, and science. Social Darwinism played a central role in the philosophy of this new cultural movement. This progressive movement of the late 1800s in Sweden even had its own dialect known as ‘New Swedish.’
Also upon his return, Arrhenius became a teacher of physics at the Stockholm Högskola. In 1893 Arrhenius was joined at the Högskola by Vilhelm Bjerknes (1862-1951). The two went on to become good friends and colleagues. The presence of Vilhelm Bjerknes is significant to our investigation because he went on to identify the basic equations of atmospheric dynamics which eventually paved the way for today’s computerized atmospheric modeling. Bjerknes had studied under Heinrich Hertz (1857-1894) at the University of Bonn. His doctoral dissertation was about experimental investigations of Hertzian waves. Hertz is the father of the study of electromagnetic energy, which plays a key role in the NMP. His generalized theorems of atmospheric circulation were based on analogies between hydrodynamic and electromagnetic forces.
The Swedish meteorological establishment had extensive ties to the Stockholm Högskola and Arrhenius. The first director of Sweden’s Central Meteorological Office, a man by the name of Robert Rubenson, was a professor of physics at the Högskola from 1878 to 1887. Another Central Meteorological Office meteorologist by the name of Nils Ekholm (1848-1923) became one of Arrhenius’ closest collaborators.
Cosmic physics and the Stockholm Physics Society
In the fall of 1891, Arrhenius initiated the Stockholm Physics Society as a forum for lectures and discussion pertaining to the latest advances in physics. In the context of this new Society, physics was defined broadly as comprising neighboring fields such as meteorology, geophysics, astrophysics, and physical chemistry.
The fortnightly meetings of this new Society were held at the Physics Institute of the Stockholm Högskola. A man by the name of Bernard Hasselberg was elected president, the aforementioned Otto Petterson became vice-president, and Arrhenius became secretary. This new Society was immediately well attended. The aforementioned Robert Rubenson and Nils Ekholm attended the meetings as well a third man associated with the Central Meteorological Office by the name of Hugo Hamburg. The Stockholm Physics Society was more like a social debating club rather than a serious scientific institution.
The largest number of lectures at this new Stockholm Physics Society meeting at the Stockholm Högskola concerned the physics of the Earth, the sea, and the atmosphere. This area of study was known as ‘cosmic physics.’ Early on, most of the lectures on cosmic physics were given by Arrhenius himself. Cosmic physics is of direct applicability to today’s New Manhattan Project because modification or control of the earth’s weather must take into consideration not only the physics of the atmosphere, but all environmental factors.
Although Arrhenius probably first heard of cosmic physics during his time studying abroad in Germany, where it had been institutionalized, the variety of cosmic physics practiced in Sweden in the late 1800s and early 1900s was substantially different than that which was practiced in Germany. The German cosmic physicists served as counterparts to the Swedish cosmic physicists.
This was not Arrhenius’ first work in the subject. Years earlier, in 1888, Arrhenius had studied atmospheric electricity; an aspect of cosmic physics. He analyzed measurements of atmospheric electricity as well as other meteorological data in order to understand the influence of ultraviolet light from the sun on the conductivity of the air. This was all in order to explain the movement of charged particles (ions) in the earth’s electric field and dispersion of electricity in the atmosphere. Arrhenius’ early in this subject has the New Manhattan Project written all over it.
At the Stockholm Physics Society, Arrhenius also reported on his continuing work in the area of atomic physics. Other members offered information on topics with relevance to the New Manhattan Project such as aeronautics.
The members of the Stockholm Physics Society shared not only a consuming interest in physics, but they also shared a political ideology. They were a product of their times in that they were politically progressive. Conversely, members of the progressive political parties of the time were also scientists. With the influence of these predominant political views surrounding him, Arrhenius became a progressive himself. Crawford writes:
While the passion for science was the primary bond between members of the society, they also shared progressive political opinions. Several of them – Nils Ekholm, Hugo Hamberg, Arvid Högbom – had been radicalized as students at Uppsala in the 1880s and one of them, Arvid Högbom, could claim to have been the first dues-paying member of the radical student association Verdandi, founded in 1882. The political circles in the capital with which they were most likely to sympathize were liberal reformist ones. The Liberals favored extending voting rights, limited at the time to about six percent of the adult population (women did not have the right to vote), and improving social welfare. In these and other issues, they often made common front with the Social Democrats. There were scientists among the supporters of both parties; in fact, the Social democratic leader, Hjalmar Branting, had worked as an astronomer before becoming engaged full-time in politics and political journalism. It was a new experience for Arrhenius to consort with colleagues whose political beliefs were translated into action. He had probably not given politics much thought before leaving Sweden. Although he never was much interested in politics, he nevertheless acquired the liberal reformist views that he would hold for the rest of his life.
Crawford continues,
The members of the Physics Society and the broader scientific circles in which Arrhenius moved shared a distinctive conception of the role of science in society. Having first-hand knowledge of the many ways in which science had improved living conditions – electric lights at home and in the streets and better sanitary standards, for instance – they firmly believed that science fostered progress. In this they came closest to the ‘optimistic evolutionism’ that was an important part of late nineteenth century philosophies of progress.
This over-arching theme of political progressivism is of note to our discussion because, as we will soon see, it was during this period of his work with the politically progressive scientists of the Stockholm Physics Society, that Arrhenius first developed the theory of man-made climate change. A theory which, to this day, is marked by political progressivism. And the theory of man-made climate change is relevant to the New Manhattan Project because today’s geoengineers use the theory of catastrophic man-made global warming as an excuse for dumping tens of thousands of megatons of toxic materials from aircraft ANNUALLY – a key aspect of today’s New Manhattan Project. Could the theory of catastrophic man-made global warming have more to do with politics than science? That’s not what the Old Media said. Please read on.
The Stockholm Physics Society also found a receptive audience in the press. Arrhenius in particular was regularly published for his reporting upon the Society’s meetings. He found the local press to be eager to publish his articles and pay him a fee for his troubles. This is consistent with today’s mass media which overwhelmingly produces content from politically progressive sources. Arrhenius provided the local media with a steady stream of his work, including a piece on the means to artificially produce rainfall. Yes, that’s right. Arrhenius did work in weather modification – a field with only the most direct relevance to today’s New Manhattan Project.
Arrhenius’ participation in the media continued for many years. He became an important popularizer of science. In the early 1900s, he had many popular books published on topics such as cosmic physics. To this day, one can order his books online. His most popular book was published in 1908 and was titled Worlds in the Making.
Cosmic physics at the Stockholm Physics Society flourished throughout the 1890s. This new discipline relied upon recent advances in data collection as well as advances in theoretical and experimental physics. Arrhenius was the main promoter of cosmic physics in Stockholm. He worked almost exclusively in cosmic physics from the mid 1890s to the first few years of the new century. It was from this work in cosmic physics that Arrhenius first began to postulate about atmospheric carbon dioxide and its effect on earth’s temperature.
Arrhenius’ theory of man-made global climate change
Almost exactly 100 years before large-scale, domestic spraying operations began, Arrhenius began his investigations of atmospheric carbon dioxide at the Stockholm Physics Society in 1895. The idea of linking variations in atmospheric carbon dioxide to climate change came to Arrhenius near the end of 1894. He started work on the notion on Christmas Eve, 1894. His first articles on the subject were published exactly one year later. Interestingly, 1895 was a year of emotional turmoil for Arrhenius. In that year, his first marriage dissolved, his chair in physics at the Högskola seemed in jeopardy, and his son was born.
Both Arrhenius and Bjerknes worked on the issue. Arrhenius’ colleague Högbom contributed significantly in this area as well. Högbom’s contributions consisted of ‘guesstimates’ of the amount of CO2 contributed to the atmosphere by different means.
Specifically, Arrhenius’ investigation pertained to atmospheric carbon dioxide’s influence upon the coming and passing of Ice Ages. Arrhenius warned that our present existence may be, “nothing but a short flourishing of civilization between two Ice Ages.”
Although Arrhenius is not referenced, it is interesting to note that in 1997 LLNL scientists Teller, Wood, and Hyde released a research paper titled “Global Warming and Ice Ages: Prospects for Physics-Based Modulation of Global Change” wherein the authors suggest that saturating the upper atmosphere with small aluminum particles could avert the next ice age.
In all honesty, there was one other scientist who had previously postulated that levels of atmospheric CO2 could have an effect upon climate. In 1861 England’s John Tyndall (1820-1893) suggested as much. But Arrhenius is more notable here because he produced a model in attempts to prove it and he popularized the theory with multiple media publications and speeches.
Arrhenius’ assertions about atmospheric CO2 having a warming effect upon earth’s climate were based upon the so-called ‘greenhouse effect’ of atmospheric vapors first postulated by Joseph Fourier (1768-1830) in 1824. The major difference here is that Fourier did not specify CO2. Although the term ‘greenhouse effect’ did not come into use until much later, it was probably Arrhenius who first used the hothouse metaphor.
In America, Arrhenius’ theories about atmospheric carbon dioxide were further investigated by geologist Thomas Chamberlin (1843-1928) at the Rockefeller founded and funded University of Chicago. It was not until the 1970s that the theory of man-made global climate change began gaining large-scale popular traction in America.
Immediately after entertaining Arrhenius’ theories of man-made global warming, the Stockholm Physics Society largely concerned itself with Bjerknes’ circulation theorem as it pertained to meteorological problems. Arrhenius did not take a significant role in these proceedings. Arrhenius, instead, went on to study cosmic physics more broadly, including the atmospheric electricity which is so central to today’s New Manhattan Project.
Arrhenius went on to write extensively about atmospheric electricity. The second volume of his 1903 book Lehrbuch der kosmischen Physik was all about the physics of the atmosphere and atmospheric electricity.
Following Arrhenius’ early significant work on the subject, the next major development in the saga of the theory of man-made climate change didn’t come until 1955 when Fortune magazine published an article written by the famous Manhattan Project scientist John von Neumann titled “Can We Survive Technology?” Von Neumann’s article ushered in the modern era of the theory as he suggested that we could employ Solar Radiation Management geoengineering in order to save ourselves from the catastrophic effects of atmospheric temperature fluctuations.
For more about von Neumann’s groundbreaking 1955 article, please refer to the author’s 2017 article “Can We Survive Technology? The Origin of SRM Geoengineering and the Modern Theory of Man-made Global Warming.”
Theosophy
It is interesting to note that in the late 1800s, at the same time Arrhenius was developing the earliest, significant work on the theory of man-made global warming, Helena Blavatsky’s Theosophy was making its first inroads into Sweden as well. Arrhenius’ first wife was enamored with it.
In Rodney Howard-Browne and Paul L. Williams’ 2018 book The Killing of Uncle Sam, the authors note how a key founding member of something called the Society of the Elect named William Stead was a disciple of Theosophy. This Society of the Elect went on to branch off into the Roundtable Movement, the Committee of 300 and many other powerful organizations. It branched off into the groups that have been secretly using global corporations to forge the course of Humanity.
Coupled with the fact that the theory of man-made climate change has been popularly used as a determinant factor for the course of Humanity, a further examination of Theosophy is warranted here.
Stead wrote that his Society of the Elect was to, “chart the course of events that would culminate in a New World Order.” According to Stead, the Pilgrim Societies, the Round Table, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bank of International Settlements, the World Bank, and the Trilateral Commission are all offshoots of the Society of the Elect.
Theosophists such as Stead were devil worshippers. In her book The Secret Doctrine, lead Theosophist Helena Blavatsky wrote, “Demon est Deus inversus: that is to say, through every point of Infinite Space thrill the magnetic and electrical currents of animate Nature, the life-giving and death-giving waves, for death on earth becomes life on another plane. Lucifer is devine and terrestrial light, the ‘Holy Ghost’ and ’Satan,’ at one and the same time…”
Thomas Edison, Adolph Hitler, and FDR’s vice-president Henry Wallace, among many other notables, were all disciples of Blavatsky. Edison has very serious implications for the New Manhattan Project as his General Electric went on to roll-out the scientific era of weather modification in 1946 and produce lots of applicable technology.
Arrhenius in California
Strangely enough, in the early 1900s Arrhenius made it all the way to California. Once here, among other, more touristy destinations, he visited Wallace Campbell’s (1862-1938) Lick Observatory at Mount Hamilton, Jacques Loeb’s (1859-1924) marine biology station in Pacific Grove, as well as the campus of UC Berkeley. For the fee of $1K (about $28K in today’s money), Arrhenius gave lectures during Berkeley’s 1904 summer session. Loeb was a professor at Berkeley and during this time, Arrhenius lodged with the Loeb family at their house. At Berkeley, Arrhenius formed lasting professional relationships with other Berkeley scientists.
In particular, Arrhenius formed a lasting correspondence with Wallace Campbell. Being that Campbell was the director of the Lick Observatory, Arrhenius shared his interest in cosmic physics. In fact, in 1905, Arrhenius and his colleague from the Högskola, mathematician and amateur astronomer Gustav Kobb joined the Lick Observatory eclipse expedition to Alhambra, Spain.
Berkeley botanist Winthrop Osterhout (1871-1964) also became a lifelong friend and correspondent. Osterhout brought Arrhenius to the Bohemian Club clubhouse in downtown San Francisco as well as to their annual summer retreat at their Bohemian Grove encampment on the banks of the Russian River, north of San Francisco. The Bohemian Club and their Bohemian Grove are of interest to our investigation of the New Manhattan Project for quite a few reasons.
Many famous scientists who have connections to the New Manhattan Project have been Bohemian Club members including Ernest Lawrence (1901-1958). The Stanford Research Institute (SRI), which has firm implications for the New Manhattan Project, was originally organized by three members at the Bohemian Grove in 1945. Also, in the early 1940s, the plans for the original Manhattan Project were partially formulated at the Bohemian Grove.
Lastly, it is interesting and relevant to our investigation to note that, during his time at and around UC Berkeley, Arrhenius most probably met Frederick Gardner Cottrell (1877-1948); a key figure in the historical development of the New Manhattan Project. Cottrell was the American pioneer in the field of electrostatic precipitation and founded something called the Research Corporation for Science Advancement (RCSA). At the time of Arrhenius’ visit, Cottrell was teaching physical chemistry at Berkeley, a subject in which Arrhenius was well versed.
Following his California trip, Arrhenius went back to his native country. In the fall of 1924, Arrhenius suffered a stroke from which he never recovered. Three years later, he died and was buried in the town cemetery of Uppsala, Sweden.
Conclusions
Although Arrhenius is the putative originator of the theory of man-made global warming, pertaining to this, he really originated nothing.
Arrhenius’ work here was unscientific from the beginning. He first had the idea that changes in amounts of atmospheric CO2 had an effect upon climate, then he created a model to prove it. The proper way to conduct science is to simply conduct experiments and see what happens. Arrhenius’ work here was contrary to the scientific method and mathematical models are inherently of seriously questionable scientific validity. For more about the philosophies behind proper scientific methods and practices, please refer to Marvin Herndon’s excellent books Maverick’s Earth and Universe as well as Herndon’s Earth and the Dark Side of Science.
Arrhenius’ models were based on what amounts to wild speculation. He did not have access to the vast amounts of data needed to confirm his grand assertions. Networks for the collection of the necessary data did not exist at the time. His work in this area relied simply upon guesstimates and contributions from his peers; not any real empirical data. He was in way over his head and thus, his work in this area holds no validity whatsoever.
The entire notion that increases in atmospheric CO2 causes an increase in average global temperature, which is what Arrhenius was asserting, is completely backwards. In his 2014 book The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science, climatologist Dr. Timothy Ball writes that an increase in the earth’s average global temperature is ALWAYS FOLLOWED by an increase in atmospheric CO2 – not the other way around. Dr. Ball specifies that the only place where an increase in atmospheric CO2 is followed by an increase in the earth’s average temperature is in the leading alarmist climate models emanating from the United Nations.
Gaping hole after gaping hole can be punched (and has been punched) through the theory of man-made climate change. I will probably be writing another book.
The science was unsound then and it is unsound now. Nevertheless, the political left of the time picked it up and ran with it then and the political left continues to run with it today. Today they do so because the agendas associated with it are the agendas of today’s mainstream, mass media-influenced, lowest common denominator, political left. The establishment wants to sell you on: big government, crony capitalism, deindustrialization, and centralized control.
That’s not to say that all leftists are stupid and/or ignorant. Many on the political left see right through the theory of man-made global warming and are really great people. Disclaimers aside, let us continue.
It is undeniable that gigantic socio-economic agendas are attached to the theory of man-made global climate change. This agenda is exemplified by the Green New Deal. From the proposed legislation presented on congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s website, we see that, because of catastrophic man-made global warming, we are supposed to: transition to alternative forms of energy, upgrade all existing buildings, eliminate greenhouse gas emissions, overhaul transportation systems, reconstruct labor laws, and oh so much more.
And, by the way, please don’t forget how geoengineers say they want to spray us with tens of thousands of megatons of toxic materials in order to save us from the dreaded climate change.
We should not be burdened with an unbelievably vast, expensive, and cruel socio-economic agenda by those of a particular political bias which has served to corrupt the underlying reason for the necessity of all of this in the first place.
It is not a coincidence that the political left was pushing it then and the political left is pushing it now. The demonstrated, inherent, historical and current political bias inextricably intertwined with the theory of man-made global warming pushes any honest, objective search for truth out of the realm of possibilities.
Our justice system provides a good example. Would you want a detective, who you know hates your guts, investigating you? No. It would only be a fair and impartial search for truth if the detective was impartial. Any significant bias on the part of the investigator would almost assuredly result in some imbalance(s) later on in the proceedings.
The lack of objectivity pertaining to the theory of man-made global warming relegates the theory solely to the realm of political ideology and nothing else.
The former chairman of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Meteorology Department, Richard Lindzen said it best when he said words to the effect that the theory of man-made global warming is about money, politics, and power, not science.
This is just the beginning of more gigantic investigations. What has been excavated here is just a small portion of something much larger.
So, what happened to this group of Swedish scientists? Did their descendants, descendant organizations, and/or disciples go on to have anything to do with the New Manhattan Project? We know what has become of their theory of man-made global warming. Did their descendants, biological or otherwise, continue with the global warming nonsense? This apparently is the case.
When one considers some of the elements discussed here in this paper such as: the theory of man-made climate change, the extreme political left, and Theosophy, one begins to make out a history of how we got to where we are now. One begins to see how the establishment uses the political left to accomplish their objectives.
Yes, we all know that the political right has their problems, too; with all the imperialistic war mongering and such. That is all very well documented. But the dysfunction of the political left tends to manifest itself in domestic tyranny rather than international tyranny and is more difficult to see because it is not as well documented. As exemplified again here by Arrhenius’ successful media forays, the political left has historically dominated media; the inadequacies of the political left are therefore not as well documented due to lack of self-introspection common in our society and not limited to the political left.
Links
PeterAKirby.com
My Minds page
My Steemit page
My GoodReads page
My YouTube channel
Websites
ClimateViewer.com
ChemSky.org
NuclearPlanet.com
GlobalSkyWatch.com
ChemtrailsProject.com
ChemtrailsProjectUK.com
ChemtrailSafety.com
GeoengineeringWatch.org
About the Author
Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael, CA author and activist. Check out the newly updated and expanded edition of his ebook Chemtrails Exposed. It’s still only 99¢, but not for long.


wakingtimes--2020-01-03--New Border Wall Construction Threatens 8 Species With Extinction

A new report shows that groundwater needed to construct Trump ‘ s border wall will increase the likelihood of extinction for eight species , as Newsweek reported .
A plan to construct the 30-foot tall border wall along the edge of the San Bernardino National Wildlife Refuge in southeastern Arizona threatens the likelihood that the rare Rio Yaqui fish will continue to survive .
The protected desert springs and streams provide the only habitat for the fish , as The Guardian reported .
In addition to the Rio Yaqui fish , three other fish rely on the groundwater there that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on a 20-mile stretch of wall .
The Yaqui topminnow ; chub ; beautiful shiner ; and Yaqui catfish are all directly threatened by the loss of groundwater .
The federally protected Chiricahua leopard frogs , Huachuca water umbel , Mexican garter snakes and Aplomado falcon are also threatened , as Newsweek reported .
The endangered species there were already under threat from a prolonged drought and extensive heat waves fueled by the climate crisis .
Furthermore , water-intensive crops like alfalfa and pecans are straining aquifers in the region , according to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wall , the Trump administration claimed a national emergency , which allowed it to divert Department of Defense funds earmarked for national security and counter-drug programs towards construction of a wall .
To accelerate construction , the federal government waived 28 laws designed to protect clean air , clean water , public lands and endangered wildlife , as the Center for Biological Diversity noted in a press release .
The Trump administration waived some of the bedrock environmental protections , including the 1969 National Environmental Policy Act , the Endangered Species Act , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Migratory Bird Conservation Act .
All of these acts require extensive scientific , environmental and costs analysis before a proposed project can move forward , according to The Guardian .
Trump has ordered 500 miles of border wall constructed by the end of 2020 , which will not allow time for environmental reviews .
So far , only about 90 miles have been built , which mostly replaced old fencing , according to the AP .
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers estimates that every mile of wall costs $ 14 million @ @ @ @ @ @ @ slated to be built on the Arizona-Mexico border will require 50 million gallons of water just to build the footers for the steel slats which will tower over the border itself .
More water will be needed for dust control during the 14 months of construction , according a recent essay by Gary Nabhan , an agricultural ecologist at the University of Arizona in Tucson investigating food and water security on the borderlands , in Earth Island Journal .
Drilling new wells to construct the wall will create some of the lasting threats @ @ @ @ @ @ @ next century , according to Nabhan ’ s essay .
“ It ’ s painful to see how much flora and fauna has already been destroyed in our beautiful desert , ” said Regina Romero , the newly elected mayor of Tucson , as The Guardian reported .
“ Throwing billions of dollars into building a wall will not make our borders more secure , but will cause destructive flooding and irreparable damage to migration patterns for many wildlife species only found in the Sonoran desert .
”

New Border Wall Construction Threatens 8 Species With Extinction
Jordan Davidson, EcoWatch
Waking Times
A new report shows that groundwater needed to construct Trump‘s border wall will increase the likelihood of extinction for eight species, as Newsweek reported.
A plan to construct the 30-foot tall border wall along the edge of the San Bernardino National Wildlife Refuge in southeastern Arizona threatens the likelihood that the rare Rio Yaqui fish will continue to survive. The protected desert springs and streams provide the only habitat for the fish, as The Guardian reported.
In addition to the Rio Yaqui fish, three other fish rely on the groundwater there that is rapidly depleting as construction marches forward on a 20-mile stretch of wall. The Yaqui topminnow; chub; beautiful shiner; and Yaqui catfish are all directly threatened by the loss of groundwater. The federally protected Chiricahua leopard frogs, Huachuca water umbel, Mexican garter snakes and Aplomado falcon are also threatened, as Newsweek reported.
“There’s good reason to believe that the Yaqui fish’s only U.S. habitat is drying up as a result of tens or hundreds of thousands of gallons of groundwater being pumped to build the border wall,” said Laiken Jordahl, a borderlands campaigner with the Center for Biological Diversity who recently visited the area, as the The Guardian reported.
The endangered species there were already under threat from a prolonged drought and extensive heat waves fueled by the climate crisis. Furthermore, water-intensive crops like alfalfa and pecans are straining aquifers in the region, according to The Guardian.
To construct the border wall, the Trump administration claimed a national emergency, which allowed it to divert Department of Defense funds earmarked for national security and counter-drug programs towards construction of a wall. To accelerate construction, the federal government waived 28 laws designed to protect clean air, clean water, public lands and endangered wildlife, as the Center for Biological Diversity noted in a press release.
The Trump administration waived some of the bedrock environmental protections, including the 1969 National Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act, and the National Fish and Wildlife Act and Migratory Bird Conservation Act. All of these acts require extensive scientific, environmental and costs analysis before a proposed project can move forward, according to The Guardian.
“With his wall obsession, President Trump has created an environmental crisis at the border,” said Democratic Arizona congressman Raúl Grijalva, according to The Guardian. “Through environmental waivers and stolen funds, he’s building a wall that will deplete precious water resources, desecrate sacred sites and destroy the environmental treasures and biodiversity that make the borderlands unique.”
Trump has ordered 500 miles of border wall constructed by the end of 2020, which will not allow time for environmental reviews. So far, only about 90 miles have been built, which mostly replaced old fencing, according to the AP.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers estimates that every mile of wall costs $14 million. The roughly 100 miles that are slated to be built on the Arizona-Mexico border will require 50 million gallons of water just to build the footers for the steel slats which will tower over the border itself. More water will be needed for dust control during the 14 months of construction, according a recent essay by Gary Nabhan, an agricultural ecologist at the University of Arizona in Tucson investigating food and water security on the borderlands, in Earth Island Journal.
Drilling new wells to construct the wall will create some of the lasting threats that already-stressed fauna will suffer over the next century, according to Nabhan’s essay.
“It’s painful to see how much flora and fauna has already been destroyed in our beautiful desert,” said Regina Romero, the newly elected mayor of Tucson, as The Guardian reported. “Throwing billions of dollars into building a wall will not make our borders more secure, but will cause destructive flooding and irreparable damage to migration patterns for many wildlife species only found in the Sonoran desert.”
By Jordan Davidson | Creative Commons | EcoWatch


wakingtimes--2020-01-02--1000’s of Tons of Radioactive Fukushima Water to be Dumped in Pacific as Independent Testing Banned

The Japanese government is refusing to allow independent testing of contaminated water found in the nuclear power plant at Fukushima , which has been leaking ever since a tsunami and earthquake devastatingly hit the facility in March 2011 .
The decision not to allow independent testing was allegedly arrived to over “ safety concerns ” in relation to the storing and transportation of the radioactive water .
“ Other organizations are not permitted to carry out tests of the water…If we are going to allow external organizations to test the treated water then we would need to go through very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ water is contaminated .
If it is taken outside this facility , then there need to be strict regulations.
” – Hideki Yagi , a spokesman for the Tokyo Electric Power Company ( TEPCO ) However , independent environmental groups including Greenpeace and Citizens ’ Nuclear Information Centre ( CNIC ) assert that this is indeed a cover-up against the true level of contamination in the water used to cool three damaged reactors .
Although the contaminated water is deemed too dangerous to test for potency , the government of Japan and TEPCO @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to dump into the pacific ocean as they likely plan to do as soon as their storage tanks reach maximum capacity in the summer of 2020 .
READ : FUKUSHIMA – THE UNTOUCHABLE ECO-APOCALYPSE NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT The amount of contaminated water at Fukushima is astounding .
On top of an undisclosed amount which we still don ’ t know the potency of , ground water continues to seep into the basement levels of the facility with an additional 120 tons accumulating every day , according to the London Telegraph .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the contaminated water at Fukushima is not only causing the public to lose faith in the government ’ s ability to safely manage emergencies , but whether Japanese citizens can trust them to tell the truth about the dangers they face as a country .
In 2016 , the Japan government estimated the cost of the Fukushima disaster to be about 21.5 trillion yen ( $ 188 billion ) , nearly doubled compared to their previous projection of 11 trillion yen in 2013 .
In 2012 , exactly one year after the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ citizens favored phasing out nuclear power altogether .
This led to the then-prime minister Yoshihiko Noda announcing a plan to phase out Japanese nuclear power completely by 2040 .
However , current prime minister Shinzo Abe walked back that statement in 2016 , announcing that Japan “ can not do without ” nuclear power as anywhere from 3.1-4.7 % of Japan ’ s electricity is supplied by nuclear .
By 2030 , the government that number to be between 20-22 % .
Since Abe ’ s government took power in late 2012 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ several nuclear power plants , including the Onagawa reactor which was also damaged by the earthquake on March 11 , 2011 .
They claim that the disposal of Fukushima ’ s radioactive water will have only a “ small ” impact on humans , but how do we know that ’ s true without independent testing ?
How do we know what impact the radiation will have on marine life , fish , and in turn , humans who eat fish caught near the dumping site ?
The Japanese government and nuclear companies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re doing is completely safe , “ but that has to be full of caveats because the way that information has been presented is confusing and not transparent so ordinary people do not understand and can not make informed decisions , ” says Azby Brown , lead researcher for Safecast Japan , a Tokyo-based group which monitors radiation .
Phillip Schneider is a student as well as a staff writer and assistant editor for Waking Times .
If you would like to see more of his work , you can visit his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ free speech social network Minds .
This article ( 1000 ’ s of Tons of Radioactive Fukushima Water to be Dumped in Pacific as Independent Testing Banned ) as originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Phillip Schneider and WakingTimes.com .
It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution , author bio , and this copyright statement .
Like Waking Times on Facebook .
Follow Waking Times on Twitter .

1000’s of Tons of Radioactive Fukushima Water to be Dumped in Pacific as Independent Testing Banned
Phillip Schneider, Staff Writer
Waking Times
The Japanese government is refusing to allow independent testing of contaminated water found in the nuclear power plant at Fukushima, which has been leaking ever since a tsunami and earthquake devastatingly hit the facility in March 2011.
The decision not to allow independent testing was allegedly arrived to over “safety concerns” in relation to the storing and transportation of the radioactive water.
“Other organizations are not permitted to carry out tests of the water…If we are going to allow external organizations to test the treated water then we would need to go through very strict procedures and due process because that water is contaminated. If it is taken outside this facility, then there need to be strict regulations.” – Hideki Yagi, a spokesman for the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO)
However, independent environmental groups including Greenpeace and Citizens’ Nuclear Information Centre (CNIC) assert that this is indeed a cover-up against the true level of contamination in the water used to cool three damaged reactors.
“There would need to be lots of checks because there is a lot of water, but right now it looks very much to the outside world that they are trying to cover something up – as they have a long history of doing.” – Hideyuki Ban, co-director of CNIC
Although the contaminated water is deemed too dangerous to test for potency, the government of Japan and TEPCO both regard it as not too dangerous to dump into the pacific ocean as they likely plan to do as soon as their storage tanks reach maximum capacity in the summer of 2020.
The amount of contaminated water at Fukushima is astounding. On top of an undisclosed amount which we still don’t know the potency of, ground water continues to seep into the basement levels of the facility with an additional 120 tons accumulating every day, according to the London Telegraph.
The decision not to allow third-party testing of the contaminated water at Fukushima is not only causing the public to lose faith in the government’s ability to safely manage emergencies, but whether Japanese citizens can trust them to tell the truth about the dangers they face as a country.
“Tepco has lost trust across society in Japan as well as in the international community, including in South Korea, and providing samples for analysis would be in their best interests – unless they are covering something up…so providing samples that could verify their reports on content would go some way to demonstrating their commitment to transparency.” – Shaun Burnie, Senior Nuclear Specialist for Greenpeace
In 2016, the Japan government estimated the cost of the Fukushima disaster to be about 21.5 trillion yen ($188 billion), nearly doubled compared to their previous projection of 11 trillion yen in 2013.
In 2012, exactly one year after the disaster, 79.6% of polled Japanese citizens favored phasing out nuclear power altogether. This led to the then-prime minister Yoshihiko Noda announcing a plan to phase out Japanese nuclear power completely by 2040. However, current prime minister Shinzo Abe walked back that statement in 2016, announcing that Japan “cannot do without” nuclear power as anywhere from 3.1-4.7% of Japan’s electricity is supplied by nuclear. By 2030, the government that number to be between 20-22%.
Since Abe’s government took power in late 2012, they have given the green light to several nuclear power plants, including the Onagawa reactor which was also damaged by the earthquake on March 11, 2011.
They claim that the disposal of Fukushima’s radioactive water will have only a “small” impact on humans, but how do we know that’s true without independent testing? How do we know what impact the radiation will have on marine life, fish, and in turn, humans who eat fish caught near the dumping site?
The Japanese government and nuclear companies want you to believe that what they’re doing is completely safe, “but that has to be full of caveats because the way that information has been presented is confusing and not transparent so ordinary people do not understand and cannot make informed decisions,” says Azby Brown, lead researcher for Safecast Japan, a Tokyo-based group which monitors radiation.
Read more articles from Phillip Schneider.
About the Author
Phillip Schneider is a student as well as a staff writer and assistant editor for Waking Times. If you would like to see more of his work, you can visit his website, or follow him on the free speech social network Minds.
This article (1000’s of Tons of Radioactive Fukushima Water to be Dumped in Pacific as Independent Testing Banned) as originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Phillip Schneider and WakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement.


wakingtimes--2020-01-02--Oil Companies Were Not Held Accountable for 10.8 Million Gallons of Oil Spilled in Gulf of Mexico

The devastation to lives and homes caused by Hurricane Katrina masked a massive crude oil spill that the hurricane caused by damaging rigs and storage tanks in the Gulf of Mexico .
The damage was made worse a few weeks later when Hurricane Rita struck the area .
The federal regulators that oversee oil and gas operation in the Gulf estimated that more than 400 pipelines and 100 drilling platforms were damaged , leading to 10.8 million gallons of crude oil spilling into the Gulf — the same amount as the Exxon Valdez oil spill .
Now , 14 years @ @ @ @ @ @ @ damage to natural resources has been carried out .
There is no plan to help restore impacted ecosystems .
And not one of the 140 responsible parties has faced a fine or even a citation , according to an exclusive investigation by ProPublica , The Times-Picayune and The Advocate .
Instead of having to pay fines , the companies whose oil spilled into the water have actually been reimbursed $ 19 million from a federal trust for the oil they lost , claiming that the spills and damage were caused by an “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the review by ProPublica and its partners .
The Act of God defense holds a lot of weight in Louisiana .
Adam Babich , former director of the Tulane Environmental Law Clinic , told the journalists at ProPublica and its partners that while the act of God defense does not usually release oil companies from liability , it does weaken arguments to hold them accountable .
The full scale of the damage may never be fully understood without a comprehensive review and assessment .
Even a tiny amount of spilled crude oil @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that protects inland areas from storms .
The oil that seeps into the marshes affects worms and snails , which are eaten by birds and fish .
Marsh plants begin to die , which allows saltwater to eat away at the coastline .
That allows the next storm to push further inland , according to Darryl Malek-Wiley , an organizer with the Sierra Club , who spoke to the ProPublica investigation .
The inaction seems to violate the Oil Pollution Act , passed by Congress in response to the Valdez oil spill .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to work with the companies to assess damage to natural resources .
After a comprehensive report is completed on the value of the affected plants , soil , water and wildlife , the responsible parties must foot the bill for restoration efforts , according to the ProPublica review .
By not completing an environmental assessment , Louisiana is missing out on hundreds of millions of dollars in environmental remediation money .
Cochran said that if the oil companies responsible for the rigs and storage tanks paid for restoration at the same rate that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , then Louisiana would have $ 700 million more in its restoration budget , according to ProPublica , The Times-Picayune and The Advocate .
Since Hurricane Katrina swept over the Gulf waters with category 5 strength , nothing has been done to protect against storm-related oil spills or the damage to the environment , according to the investigation .
Scientists predict that future storms , which will increase in intensity due to the climate crisis , will exacerbate environmental damage .
“ In the Gulf , storms are predicted to be less frequent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” said Sunshine Van Bael , an ecologist at Tulane University who evaluated damage to marsh ecosystems from the BP oil spill , to to ProPublica , The Times-Picayune and The Advocate .
“ One thing that storms do is , if oil has been buried underneath the marsh because it wasn ’ t rehabilitated , a storm could come along and whip that back up to the surface .
So , the aftereffects of the oil spills might be greater [ with climate change ] since the storms are predicted to @ @ @ @ @

Oil Companies Were Not Held Accountable for 10.8 Million Gallons of Oil Spilled in Gulf of Mexico
Jordan Davidson, EcoWatch
Waking Times
The devastation to lives and homes caused by Hurricane Katrina masked a massive crude oil spill that the hurricane caused by damaging rigs and storage tanks in the Gulf of Mexico. The damage was made worse a few weeks later when Hurricane Rita struck the area. The federal regulators that oversee oil and gas operation in the Gulf estimated that more than 400 pipelines and 100 drilling platforms were damaged, leading to 10.8 million gallons of crude oil spilling into the Gulf — the same amount as the Exxon Valdez oil spill.
Now, 14 years later, not one assessment of the damage to natural resources has been carried out. There is no plan to help restore impacted ecosystems. And not one of the 140 responsible parties has faced a fine or even a citation, according to an exclusive investigation by ProPublica, The Times-Picayune and The Advocate.
Instead of having to pay fines, the companies whose oil spilled into the water have actually been reimbursed $19 million from a federal trust for the oil they lost, claiming that the spills and damage were caused by an “unforeseeable act of God,” according to the review by ProPublica and its partners.
The Act of God defense holds a lot of weight in Louisiana. Adam Babich, former director of the Tulane Environmental Law Clinic, told the journalists at ProPublica and its partners that while the act of God defense does not usually release oil companies from liability, it does weaken arguments to hold them accountable.
“We don’t normally penalize [companies] for act of God events,” said Greg Langley of the Department of Environmental Quality to ProPublica, The Times-Picayune and The Advocate.”We just get right to remediation.”
The full scale of the damage may never be fully understood without a comprehensive review and assessment. Even a tiny amount of spilled crude oil has a devastating impact and damages coastline that protects inland areas from storms.
The oil that seeps into the marshes affects worms and snails, which are eaten by birds and fish. Marsh plants begin to die, which allows saltwater to eat away at the coastline. That allows the next storm to push further inland, according to Darryl Malek-Wiley, an organizer with the Sierra Club, who spoke to the ProPublica investigation.
“I think it’s an outrage that they haven’t made any progress,” Malek-Wiley said to ProPublica. “Here we are 14 years later and they haven’t done anything. A year after Katrina, things had settled down significantly. I think the oil response team should have been moving forward with environmental damage claims.”
The inaction seems to violate the Oil Pollution Act, passed by Congress in response to the Valdez oil spill. That law mandates federal and state agencies to work with the companies to assess damage to natural resources. After a comprehensive report is completed on the value of the affected plants, soil, water and wildlife, the responsible parties must foot the bill for restoration efforts, according to the ProPublica review.
“It’s pretty clear what the value of money is in a place like Louisiana, where we have these restoration needs,” Steve Cochran, associate vice president for coastal resilience at the Environmental Defense Fund, to the investigative journalists at ProPublica, The Times-Picayune and The Advocate. “Every dollar that’s not collected [in fines] is a dollar that we can’t spend on this work.”
By not completing an environmental assessment, Louisiana is missing out on hundreds of millions of dollars in environmental remediation money. Cochran said that if the oil companies responsible for the rigs and storage tanks paid for restoration at the same rate that BP paid for the Deepwater Horizon spill, then Louisiana would have $700 million more in its restoration budget, according to ProPublica, The Times-Picayune and The Advocate.
“It’s a lot of work that’s desperately needed but that is only possible because that [BP settlement] money became available,” Cochran said to ProPublica, The Times-Picayune and The Advocate.
Since Hurricane Katrina swept over the Gulf waters with category 5 strength, nothing has been done to protect against storm-related oil spills or the damage to the environment, according to the investigation.
Scientists predict that future storms, which will increase in intensity due to the climate crisis, will exacerbate environmental damage.
“In the Gulf, storms are predicted to be less frequent but more intense when they do come,” said Sunshine Van Bael, an ecologist at Tulane University who evaluated damage to marsh ecosystems from the BP oil spill, to to ProPublica, The Times-Picayune and The Advocate. “One thing that storms do is, if oil has been buried underneath the marsh because it wasn’t rehabilitated, a storm could come along and whip that back up to the surface. So, the aftereffects of the oil spills might be greater [with climate change] since the storms are predicted to be more intense.”
By Jordan Davidson | Creative Commons | EcoWatch


wakingtimes--2020-01-02--Scientists Cleared Alzheimer’s Plaque From Mice Using Nothing but Light and Sound

In previous articles , we discussed the importance of brain waves in modern technological developments .
It even seemed like something “ magical ” to me , when I was writing about how through brain waves and AI scientists can “ see ” what you are seeing in real-time .
Now , even more progress is being made thanks to neuroscientists at MIT .
So far , there is no cure for Alzheimer ’ s despite rapid growth in the number of people living with the disease .
It is estimated that around 44 million people around the world suffer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of dementia .
In the U.S. , an estimated 5.5 million people have Alzheimer ’ s disease .
It is also the sixth-leading cause of death in the U.S , killing even more people than breast and prostate cancer combined .
Even though a few drugs temporarily manage certain cognitive symptoms of the illness , none of them can stop Alzheimer ’ s progression .
Virtually all new treatments have failed in clinical trials .
“ We really don ’ t have much to offer people , ” says Shannon Macauley , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This new research basically works with imitating the healthy rhythmic patterns—or brain waves—that operate at different frequencies .
Gamma brain waves oscillate at roughly 30 to 100 Hz and are associated with higher-order cognitive functions , and they are also known to decrease in the brains of people suffering from Alzheimer ’ s .
A previous study showed that flashing light 40 times a second into the eyes of mice treated their Alzheimer ’ s disease .
If this was not amazing enough , researchers also added sound of a similar frequency @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In a way , we can be talking of “ healing frequencies ” … some “ alternative ” therapies in medicine may not sound so crazy now , huh ?
This noninvasive treatment also greatly reduced the number of amyloid plaques found in the brains of these mice .
Plaques were cleared in large swaths of the brain , including areas critical for cognitive functions such as learning and memory .
Another fact to consider is that the researchers found that if they treated the mice for one week , then waited another @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the positive effects had faded , suggesting that the treatment would need to be given continuously to maintain the benefits .
Tsui used a frequency ranging around 40 Hertz , a sound only just high enough for humans to hear , and as a “ side effect , ” it also helped clear the nearby hippocampus , an important area of the brain associated with memory .
After treatment , mice exposed to this “ therapy ” performed better in a range of cognitive tasks .
Findings show an overall neuroprotective effect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ neurodegeneration , the researchers reported .
While further research is needed and a few numbers to understand , such as 40 , the frequency that is creating a profound impact in mice , this is encouraging news to finally have an effective treatment for all stages of Alzheimer ’ s disease .

Scientists Cleared Alzheimer’s Plaque From Mice Using Nothing but Light and Sound
Manuel Garcia Aguilar, The Mind Unleashed
Waking Times
In previous articles, we discussed the importance of brain waves in modern technological developments. It even seemed like something “magical” to me, when I was writing about how through brain waves and AI scientists can “see” what you are seeing in real-time. Now, even more progress is being made thanks to neuroscientists at MIT.
So far, there is no cure for Alzheimer’s despite rapid growth in the number of people living with the disease. It is estimated that around 44 million people around the world suffer from this condition or a related form of dementia. In the U.S., an estimated 5.5 million people have Alzheimer’s disease. It is also the sixth-leading cause of death in the U.S, killing even more people than breast and prostate cancer combined.
Even though a few drugs temporarily manage certain cognitive symptoms of the illness, none of them can stop Alzheimer’s progression. Virtually all new treatments have failed in clinical trials. “We really don’t have much to offer people,” says Shannon Macauley, a neuroscientist at Wake Forest School of Medicine.
This new research basically works with imitating the healthy rhythmic patterns—or brain waves—that operate at different frequencies. Gamma brain waves oscillate at roughly 30 to 100 Hz and are associated with higher-order cognitive functions, and they are also known to decrease in the brains of people suffering from Alzheimer’s.
A previous study showed that flashing light 40 times a second into the eyes of mice treated their Alzheimer’s disease. If this was not amazing enough, researchers also added sound of a similar frequency and this dramatically improved the results. In a way, we can be talking of “healing frequencies”… some “alternative” therapies in medicine may not sound so crazy now, huh?
This noninvasive treatment also greatly reduced the number of amyloid plaques found in the brains of these mice. Plaques were cleared in large swaths of the brain, including areas critical for cognitive functions such as learning and memory.
“When we combine visual and auditory stimulation for a week, we see the engagement of the prefrontal cortex and a very dramatic reduction of amyloid,” said Li-Huei Tsai, one of the researchers from MIT’s Picower Institute for Learning and Memory.
Another fact to consider is that the researchers found that if they treated the mice for one week, then waited another week to perform the tests, many of the positive effects had faded, suggesting that the treatment would need to be given continuously to maintain the benefits.
Tsui used a frequency ranging around 40 Hertz, a sound only just high enough for humans to hear, and as a “side effect,” it also helped clear the nearby hippocampus, an important area of the brain associated with memory. After treatment, mice exposed to this “therapy” performed better in a range of cognitive tasks. Findings show an overall neuroprotective effect, even in the later stages of neurodegeneration, the researchers reported.
“Though there are important differences among species, there is reason to be optimistic that these methods can provide useful interventions for humans,” says Nancy Kopell, a professor of mathematics and statistics at Boston University.
While further research is needed and a few numbers to understand, such as 40, the frequency that is creating a profound impact in mice, this is encouraging news to finally have an effective treatment for all stages of Alzheimer’s disease.
By Manuel García Aguilar | Creative Commons | TheMindUnleashed.com