wakingtimes--2020-08-11--New York City Police Use Pandemic To Create COVID-19 Checkpoints

New York City Police Use Pandemic To Create COVID-19 Checkpoints Get the latest Waking Times articles delivered to your inbox .
Sign up here .
A recent article in The New York Post revealed how the NYPD used the pandemic to justify creating COVID-19 checkpoints .
Police are using the pandemic as an excuse to circumvent the Fourth Amendment by asking a vehicle ’ s occupants to answer questions like have they spent more than 24 hours during the previous 14 days in any state on New York ’ s restricted list ?
The city has the audacity to claim @ @ @ @ @ @ @ educational.
” There is nothing quick and educational about being stopped and questioned by government officials .
Is there anything educational about fining people $ 10,000 dollars ?
Earlier this year , The Orlando Sentinel called COVID-19 checkpoints security theater , and worried about the cost to taxpayers .
COVID-19 checkpoints have also been set up in Rhode Island , North Carolina , Colorado , Mississippi , Louisiana and Texas .
Government officials use COVID-19 as an excuse to question and interrogate visitors .
Imagine getting off a train or bus in New @ @ @ @ @ @ @ through a government checkpoint .
This is America , you say ?
I can refuse to answer their questions , right ?
People who refuse to answer their questions could be fined anywhere from $ 2,000- $ 10,000 .
Three years ago , I revealed that police have created thirty-three different types of checkpoints .
But this latest ploy ; using a pandemic as an excuse to create another police checkpoint , is inexcusable .
COVID-19 checkpoints make a mockery of police reform and tramples our Bill of Rights .
It is only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spread across the country .

New York City Police Use Pandemic To Create COVID-19 Checkpoints
MassPrivateI, Guest
Waking Times
A recent article in The New York Post revealed how the NYPD used the pandemic to justify creating COVID-19 checkpoints.
New York officials have stopped 353 cars at entrances to the Big Apple to warn travelers of the mandatory two-week quarantine rule. The stops were made from Wednesday through Friday at bridges and tunnels, according to Mayor Bill de Blasio’s office.
Police are using the pandemic as an excuse to circumvent the Fourth Amendment by asking a vehicle’s occupants to answer questions like have they spent more than 24 hours during the previous 14 days in any state on New York’s restricted list?
The city has the audacity to claim that these stops are “quick and educational.” There is nothing quick and educational about being stopped and questioned by government officials.
Is there anything educational about fining people $10,000 dollars?
Travelers who violate the quarantine rule could face up to $10,000 in fines. There are currently 35 states plus Puerto Rico on the list.
Earlier this year, The Orlando Sentinel called COVID-19 checkpoints security theater, and worried about the cost to taxpayers. COVID-19 checkpoints have also been set up in Rhode Island, North Carolina, Colorado, Mississippi, Louisiana and Texas.
A WKZO article shows U.S. military personnel conducting a COVID-19 checkpoint at Penn Station.
A few dozen travelers got off a train from Miami at New York City’s Penn Station on Thursday and were greeted by a team of public health workers and mayoral office staff who handed them informational fliers about the state’s new COVID-19 quarantine rules.
Government officials use COVID-19 as an excuse to question and interrogate visitors.
The team, comprised of Mayor Bill de Blasio’s public engagement unit and the city’s COVID-19 Test & Trace Corps, were running a checkpoint starting at Penn Station on Thursday to ensure that visitors from any of the 35 states on New York’s travel advisory were aware of the 14-day quarantine mandate.
Imagine getting off a train or bus in New York City and being forced to go through a government checkpoint. This is America, you say? I can refuse to answer their questions, right?
People who refuse to answer their questions could be fined anywhere from $2,000-$10,000.
A spokeswoman for City Hall said refusing to fill out the quarantine form could subject travelers from designated states to a $2000 fine, and violations of the quarantine orders could result in a $10,000 fine.
Three years ago, I revealed that police have created thirty-three different types of checkpoints. But this latest ploy; using a pandemic as an excuse to create another police checkpoint, is inexcusable.
COVID-19 checkpoints make a mockery of police reform and tramples our Bill of Rights. It is only a matter of time before COVID-19 checkpoints spread across the country.


wakingtimes--2020-08-11--WATCH: Council Member Wants People Who Refuse to Wear a Mask to be Charged with MURDER

WATCH : Council Member Wants People Who Refuse to Wear a Mask to be Charged with MURDER Get the latest Waking Times articles delivered to your inbox .
Sign up here .
On both sides of the mask debate exist levels of anger , hatred , and ignorance like we here at TFTP have never seen .
Since mask wearing has been politicized , we have seen people being killed for asking others to mask up , and being gunned down by police after refusing to mask up .
Video after video has surfaced showing mask shamers wishing death on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people .
It is pandemonium and it is seemingly getting worse .
Though we have scientists who contribute to the Free Thought Project , we are not made up of medical specialists , so we do not make recommendations on your personal health choices such as wearing a mask .
What we can recommend , however , is logic , reason , compassion , and civility when discussing and contemplating these issues .
Unfortunately , all these virtues seem to have been thrown out the window months ago when it comes to dealing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ complete lack of logic and police state tendencies , Metro Nashville At-Large Council Member Sharon Hurt has suggested charging people with attempted murder or murder for refusing to wear a mask .
Last week , during a virtual meeting of the Joint Public Safety and Health Committee , Hurt made the comments as she pushed for stronger legislation to go after those who refuse to wear a mask .
We have no idea what she is talking about as we could not find any “ organization ” that would charge people with murder @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Hurt thinks the same standard should apply to the general public .
“ This person who may very well pass this virus that ’ s out in the air because they ’ re not wearing a mask is basically doing the same thing to someone who contracts it and dies from it , ” she said .
“ Maybe there needs to be stronger legislation to say that if you do not wear a mask , and you subject exposure of this virus to someone else then there will be some stronger @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that are exposed , ” she said .
Hurt ’ s comments came as she criticized the government ’ s actions to date , which have so far accompanied a peak and subsequent decline in cases .
After making these utterly insane recommendations , Metro Nashville ’ s Director of Legislative Affairs Mike Jameson , who also participated in the virtual meeting , reminded her that the council is not some dictatorial entity who can create tyrannical laws out of thin air .
“ The Council does not have the opportunity on its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he said .
“ In terms of creating a new code or class of criminal offenses , that is a creature of state law.
” “ I was afraid that was going to be the answer , ” Hurt said in disappointment .
“ I guess that ’ s the whole point of asking for something to be done as early as the Council was pushing , ” she added .
“ It seems it was not taken as seriously as it should have been and thus we are in the situation we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clear , it is already against the law not to wear a mask in Nashville .
Last week , before Hurt advocated for charging those without a mask on with murder , the mayor announced that police will be targeting those without a mask for extortion .
Below is the video with this tyrant ’ s requests .
If it doesn ’ t start automatically , Hurt ’ s comments begin at the 1:01:40 mark .
Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state .
Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world .
Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the Free Thought Project .
Follow @ MattAgorist on Twitter , Steemit , and now on Minds .

WATCH: Council Member Wants People Who Refuse to Wear a Mask to be Charged with MURDER
Matt Agorist, The Free Thought Project
Waking Times
On both sides of the mask debate exist levels of anger, hatred, and ignorance like we here at TFTP have never seen. Since mask wearing has been politicized, we have seen people being killed for asking others to mask up, and being gunned down by police after refusing to mask up. Video after video has surfaced showing mask shamers wishing death on innocent children as anti-maskers attack other innocent people. It is pandemonium and it is seemingly getting worse.
Though we have scientists who contribute to the Free Thought Project, we are not made up of medical specialists, so we do not make recommendations on your personal health choices such as wearing a mask. What we can recommend, however, is logic, reason, compassion, and civility when discussing and contemplating these issues. Unfortunately, all these virtues seem to have been thrown out the window months ago when it comes to dealing with the pandemic.
In the latest complete lack of logic and police state tendencies, Metro Nashville At-Large Council Member Sharon Hurt has suggested charging people with attempted murder or murder for refusing to wear a mask.
Last week, during a virtual meeting of the Joint Public Safety and Health Committee, Hurt made the comments as she pushed for stronger legislation to go after those who refuse to wear a mask.
As the TN Star reports, Hurt said that she works for an organization that, “If they pass the virus, then they are tried for murder or attempted murder.”
We have no idea what she is talking about as we could not find any “organization” that would charge people with murder for “passing a virus.” Nevertheless, Hurt thinks the same standard should apply to the general public.
“This person who may very well pass this virus that’s out in the air because they’re not wearing a mask is basically doing the same thing to someone who contracts it and dies from it,” she said. “Maybe there needs to be stronger legislation to say that if you do not wear a mask, and you subject exposure of this virus to someone else then there will be some stronger penalty as it is in other viruses that are exposed,” she said.
Hurt’s comments came as she criticized the government’s actions to date, which have so far accompanied a peak and subsequent decline in cases.
“It seems to me that we have been more reactive as opposed to proactive and a little too late, too little,” Hurt said.
After making these utterly insane recommendations, Metro Nashville’s Director of Legislative Affairs Mike Jameson, who also participated in the virtual meeting, reminded her that the council is not some dictatorial entity who can create tyrannical laws out of thin air.
“The Council does not have the opportunity on its own to create criminal legislation,” he said. “In terms of creating a new code or class of criminal offenses, that is a creature of state law.” “I was afraid that was going to be the answer,” Hurt said in disappointment. “I guess that’s the whole point of asking for something to be done as early as the Council was pushing,” she added. “It seems it was not taken as seriously as it should have been and thus we are in the situation we are in right now.”
To be clear, it is already against the law not to wear a mask in Nashville. Last week, before Hurt advocated for charging those without a mask on with murder, the mayor announced that police will be targeting those without a mask for extortion.
“There is clear signage on Broadway reminding persons that the mask mandate has the force of law. Persons in violation can receive a Metropolitan Government citation for adjudication in Environmental Court, or a State of Tennessee criminal misdemeanor citation. Under state law, violation of the Health Department’s mask order is a class C misdemeanor,” the statement read.
Below is the video with this tyrant’s requests. If it doesn’t start automatically, Hurt’s comments begin at the 1:01:40 mark.
About the Author
Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world. Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the Free Thought Project. Follow @MattAgorist on Twitter, Steemit, and now on Minds.


wakingtimes--2020-08-11--School District Says Students Can’t Wear Pajamas Or Slippers For Online Classes

School District Says Students Can ’ t Wear Pajamas Or Slippers For Online Classes Get the latest Waking Times articles delivered to your inbox .
Sign up here .
In Springfield , Illinois , kids will be taking many of their classes online when schools open back up , but administrators are still attempting to control what the children are wearing while they are at home .
The town ’ s school district will still be forcing students to follow the dress code , even if they are home in front of the computer .
Students will not be able @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hats , bandannas or sunglasses while taking classes from home .
Jason Wind , the district ’ s director of student support , said that , “ We don ’ t need students in pajamas and all those other things while on their Zoom conferences.
” The students will also be expected to be “ sitting up out of bed , preferably at a desk or table.
” District spokeswoman , Bree Hankins , insisted that the parents had a say in the new guidelines , and said that they aren ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Our hope is that students approach remote learning as they would in a classroom setting , to the extent possible given each student ’ s individual circumstances .
However , we understand the interpretation of the dress code in a remote learning environment will differ from a normal school setting , ” Hankins said .
However , some parents have objected to the requirements , suggesting that it needlessly creates more work for them .
Christy Schmidt , a mother who has two children go to school in Springfield expressed her frustration @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Times .
School will begin in Springfield on August 31st , with a rotating schedule .
Students will attend school two days a week , and then continue their classes online for the remaining 3 days of the school week .

School District Says Students Can’t Wear Pajamas Or Slippers For Online Classes
John Vibes, The Mind Unleashed
Waking Times
In Springfield, Illinois, kids will be taking many of their classes online when schools open back up, but administrators are still attempting to control what the children are wearing while they are at home.
The town’s school district will still be forcing students to follow the dress code, even if they are home in front of the computer. Students will not be able to wear pajama pants, slippers, hats, bandannas or sunglasses while taking classes from home.
Jason Wind, the district’s director of student support, said that, “We don’t need students in pajamas and all those other things while on their Zoom conferences.” The students will also be expected to be “sitting up out of bed, preferably at a desk or table.”
District spokeswoman, Bree Hankins, insisted that the parents had a say in the new guidelines, and said that they aren’t threatening any serious punishments for rule-breakers.
“Our hope is that students approach remote learning as they would in a classroom setting, to the extent possible given each student’s individual circumstances. However, we understand the interpretation of the dress code in a remote learning environment will differ from a normal school setting,” Hankins said.
However, some parents have objected to the requirements, suggesting that it needlessly creates more work for them.
Christy Schmidt, a mother who has two children go to school in Springfield expressed her frustration with the policy to the New York Times.
“How much hassle are you going to give the parent with four kids, working a full-time job trying to support their kids, and their kid attended the Zoom meeting, but he was in pajamas?” Schmidt said.
School will begin in Springfield on August 31st, with a rotating schedule. Students will attend school two days a week, and then continue their classes online for the remaining 3 days of the school week.
By John Vibes | Creative Commons | TheMindUnleashed.com


wakingtimes--2020-08-12--3 Ways Human Psychology is Being Exploited to Create an Obedient, Self-Policing Society

3 Ways Human Psychology is Being Exploited to Create an Obedient , Self-Policing Society Get the latest Waking Times articles delivered to your inbox .
Sign up here .
Things are changing .
Rapidly .
So , get used to it , and don ’ t look back , because as we march into this brave new world together , the pressure and stress of the situation is going to affect people ’ s mental health and personalities in more dramatic ways .
The human psyche is built to withstand only a certain amount of pressure , and in our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the stressful stimuli we ’ re soaking up in a single day is astronomical .
The mind has a few coping mechanisms , like fight or flight , cognitive dissonance , denial , Stockholm syndrome , etc.
, but in a time like this , you ’ re likely to experience it all .
As the chronic stress grinds on , with no end in sight , it wears us down emotionally , physically , and mentally , and in this state we regress into more habitual , subconsciously driven behaviors , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ manipulate .
To the interrogator or torturer , sustained stress is the key to unlocking the mind and the key to creating obedience and conformity .
READ : Hypnotist Uses Neuro-Linguistic Programming to Get Out of Speeding Ticket The scientific study of the mass mind has become an integrated tool of the economy and the state .
Edward Bernays laid the groundwork for this .
He was Sigmund Freud ’ s nephew , and in a few classic publications like Propaganda and Crystallizing Public Opinion , he articulated his theory that the mass @ @ @ @ @ @ @ degree .
In the preface to A Brave New World , Aldous Huxley warned us that a minority interest in our world was deliberately and successfully exploiting the mass human mind for the interests of commerce and politics .
There has been a sustained , century long effort to crack the code of the mass mind , which today includes all of the tools of technology , media and social media .
In the midst of the Covid-19 crisis , in the most divisive period in modern American history , some of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ taking root in the mass mind .
When people are told what to do by an apparent authority figure , they will even go so far as to harm and even kill another .
Stanley Milgram ’ s famous 1961 social experiment on obedience to authority is hailed as a milestone in our understanding of how people ’ s ethics can drastically change when responsibility for their actions is deferred on to an authority figure , such as an ‘ expert ’ or leader .
Intrigued by the role of Nazi military personnel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wanted to know how much coercion people needed in order to willingly inflict harm on another person .
The suggested conclusion is that people are inherently unable to think for themselves when given a subordinate role in some authoritarian hierarchy , such as the role of the people in a state-controlled world .
Their natural and unconscious reaction is to defer responsibility for their actions to someone of authority , relieving themselves of the stress of guilt .
In the Covid-19 reality , the masses are being deliberately directed toward one set of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ away from other credible but contrarian perspectives .
Those today who believe in mainstream authority are taking franchise in bullying , harassing , censoring , and threatening those who would prefer to be neutral or contrarian .
Coverage of this experiment is seen below : Furthermore , the official enforcers of new Covid policies present more concrete examples of how this dynamic plays out .
Recent footage from Australia shows a male cop choking a woman for improperly wearing a mask , and around the world those obeying the rules are increasingly violent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ There ’ s also this video of a woman telling two young children she hopes they die for not wearing masks : 2 .
When put into a position of authority people will abuse their power .
When put into a subjugated position , people will behave as prisoners .
Dr. Phillip Zombardo conducted another well-known study on social authority in 1971 .
In what is known as the Stanford Prison experiment , students at Stanford University answered an ad to participate in a research study with the aim of studying the psychological @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prison guard .
The group of prisoners were humiliated , searched , deloused , and locked up , humiliated , taunted and abused .
They were issued uniforms , ID numbers , had their hair covered with a nylon stocking , and had one ankle bound in a heavy chain , thus masking their personal identity and stripping it away .
The guards were given no specific training , and were free to do whatever they felt was necessary to maintain order .
They were dressed in khaki uniforms and sunglasses , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to harass the prisoners at all hours of the day .
The full story of this experiment is fascinating , but the short version is that in no time the guards found all kinds of ways to tease and punish the prisoners , and the prisoners attempted rebellion only to be suppressed and ultimately reduced to withdrawn , emotionally unstable behavior .
The dynamic of power and powerless was clearly defined and the prisoners coped with it in a variety of ways .
Watch a documentary on this experiment here : Today , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have assumed the role of prisoner , forfeiting their individual identity and discernment .
Most people go along to get along , but many are assuming the role of prison guard , attacking and harassing those who , for whatever reason , choose not to comply with new mandates about masks and other arbitrary Covid restrictions .
This recent video of a woman throwing hot coffee in the face a guy who was not wearing a mask is telling : 3 .
When people are put into a doctor/patient relationship as the patient @ @ @ @ @ @ @ helplessness and powerlessness .
The doctor/patient relationship is perhaps the most economically and psychologically exploited relationship in society today .
It is the foundation of big pharma ’ s grip on modern medicine , and it is big business .
The influence doctors have over patients is total , and our society is being reshaped with the masses being positioned as patients whom must defer all medical decisions to an elite class of approved doctors and experts .
In a short film , Amazing Polly explains how the medical establishment ’ s invasion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is historically one of the most dangerous forms of psychological control .
Not only does it disempower the patient , it also over-glorifies the doctor , who then has an incentive to assert more dominance over the patient .
We ’ re seeing a manifestation of Munchausen syndrome on mass level , as the populace is kept ill by palliative care and held hostage by the vaccine industry .
Rather than being empowered to protect ourselves by caring for the body and the immune system , we are being told to wait helplessly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ laid out in the following video : One of the most important observations made about the Stanford Experiment is that during the whole thing , not one person realized the changes in their own personality .
They were said to have been so wholly wrapped up in the experience , that neither the guards nor prisoners could see the whole picture of what was happening and how they were all changing together .
Which is precisely what is happening now as these psychological dynamics are put into play at the mass level .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ stressors in our lives , we are re-organizing ourselves to conform , be obedient and be self-policing .
In a 2012 research paper endtitled Contesting the “ Nature ” Of Conformity : What Milgram and Zimbardo ’ s Studies Really Show , authors Alexander Haslam and Stephen D. Reicher comment : Most people don ’ t see it .
Are you paying attention ?
Dylan Charles is the editor of Waking Times and host of Battered Souls : A Podcast About Transformation , both dedicated to ideas of personal transformation , societal awakening @ @ @ @ @ @ @ journey is deeply inspired by shamanic plant medicines and the arts of Kung Fu , Qi Gong and Yoga .
After seven years of living in Costa Rica , he now lives in the Blue Ridge Mountains , where he practices Brazilian Jiu Jitsu and enjoys spending time with family .
He has written hundreds of articles , reaching and inspiring millions of people around the world .
Dylan is available for interviews and podcasts , and offers his services as a professional life coach to people looking to break free from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in life .
Contact Dylan at WakingTimes @ gmail.com .
This article ( 3 Ways Human Psychology is Being Exploited to Create an Obedient , Self-Policing Society ) was originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Dylan Charles and WakingTimes.com .
It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution , author bio , and this copyright statement .

3 Ways Human Psychology is Being Exploited to Create an Obedient, Self-Policing Society
Dylan Charles, Editor
Waking Times
Things are changing. Rapidly. So, get used to it, and don’t look back, because as we march into this brave new world together, the pressure and stress of the situation is going to affect people’s mental health and personalities in more dramatic ways.
The human psyche is built to withstand only a certain amount of pressure, and in our over-connected world, during a global crisis, the stressful stimuli we’re soaking up in a single day is astronomical. The mind has a few coping mechanisms, like fight or flight, cognitive dissonance, denial, Stockholm syndrome, etc., but in a time like this, you’re likely to experience it all.
As the chronic stress grinds on, with no end in sight, it wears us down emotionally, physically, and mentally, and in this state we regress into more habitual, subconsciously driven behaviors, and the mind becomes very easy to manipulate. To the interrogator or torturer, sustained stress is the key to unlocking the mind and the key to creating obedience and conformity.
The scientific study of the mass mind has become an integrated tool of the economy and the state. Edward Bernays laid the groundwork for this. He was Sigmund Freud’s nephew, and in a few classic publications like Propaganda and Crystallizing Public Opinion, he articulated his theory that the mass mind can be controlled to an extraordinary degree.
“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, and our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of…. It is they who pull the wires that control the public mind.” ~Edward L. Bernays, Propaganda (1928)
In the preface to A Brave New World, Aldous Huxley warned us that a minority interest in our world was deliberately and successfully exploiting the mass human mind for the interests of commerce and politics.
“Impersonal forces over which we have almost no control seem to be pushing us all in the direction of the Brave New Worldian nightmare; and this impersonal pushing is being consciously accelerated by representatives of commercial and political organizations who have developed a number of new techniques for manipulating, in the interest of some minority, the thoughts and feelings of the masses.” ~Aldous Huxley, Preface to A Brave New World
There has been a sustained, century long effort to crack the code of the mass mind, which today includes all of the tools of technology, media and social media. In the midst of the Covid-19 crisis, in the most divisive period in modern American history, some of the more dangerous aspects of human psychology are taking root in the mass mind.
1. Deferring responsibility to perceived authority figures.
When people are told what to do by an apparent authority figure, they will even go so far as to harm and even kill another.
Stanley Milgram’s famous 1961 social experiment on obedience to authority is hailed as a milestone in our understanding of how people’s ethics can drastically change when responsibility for their actions is deferred on to an authority figure, such as an ‘expert’ or leader. Intrigued by the role of Nazi military personnel in concentration camps during WWII, Milgram wanted to know how much coercion people needed in order to willingly inflict harm on another person.
“He asked volunteers to deliver an electric shock to a stranger. Unbeknownst to the volunteers, there was no shock—and the people they were shocking were actors pretending to be terribly hurt, even feigning heart attacks. Milgram found that most people would keep delivering the shocks when ordered by a person in a lab coat, even when they believed that person was gravely injured. Only a tiny percentage of people refused.” [Source]
The suggested conclusion is that people are inherently unable to think for themselves when given a subordinate role in some authoritarian hierarchy, such as the role of the people in a state-controlled world. Their natural and unconscious reaction is to defer responsibility for their actions to someone of authority, relieving themselves of the stress of guilt.
“Ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process. Moreover, even when the destructive effects of their work become patently clear, and they are asked to carry out actions incompatible with fundamental standards of morality, relatively few people have the resources needed to resist authority.” ~Stanley Milgram, The Perils of Obedience, 1974
In the Covid-19 reality, the masses are being deliberately directed toward one set of experts and influencers, and and directed away from other credible but contrarian perspectives. Those today who believe in mainstream authority are taking franchise in bullying, harassing, censoring, and threatening those who would prefer to be neutral or contrarian.
Coverage of this experiment is seen below:
Furthermore, the official enforcers of new Covid policies present more concrete examples of how this dynamic plays out. Recent footage from Australia shows a male cop choking a woman for improperly wearing a mask, and around the world those obeying the rules are increasingly violent and callous towards those not obeying.
There’s also this video of a woman telling two young children she hopes they die for not wearing masks:
2. When put into a position of authority people will abuse their power. When put into a subjugated position, people will behave as prisoners.
Dr. Phillip Zombardo conducted another well-known study on social authority in 1971. In what is known as the Stanford Prison experiment, students at Stanford University answered an ad to participate in a research study with the aim of studying the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or a prison guard.
The group of prisoners were humiliated, searched, deloused, and locked up, humiliated, taunted and abused.
“A degradation procedure was designed in part to humiliate prisoners and in part to be sure they weren’t bringing in any germs to contaminate our jail.” ~Stanford Prison Experiment
They were issued uniforms, ID numbers, had their hair covered with a nylon stocking, and had one ankle bound in a heavy chain, thus masking their personal identity and stripping it away.
“The process of having one’s head shaved, which takes place in most prisons as well as in the military, is designed in part to minimize each person’s individuality, since some people express their individuality through hair style or length. It is also a way of getting people to begin complying with the arbitrary, coercive rules of the institution. The dramatic change in appearance of having one’s head shaved can be seen on this page.” ~Stanford Prison Experiment
The guards were given no specific training, and were free to do whatever they felt was necessary to maintain order. They were dressed in khaki uniforms and sunglasses, and given whistles and billy clubs with which to harass the prisoners at all hours of the day.
The full story of this experiment is fascinating, but the short version is that in no time the guards found all kinds of ways to tease and punish the prisoners, and the prisoners attempted rebellion only to be suppressed and ultimately reduced to withdrawn, emotionally unstable behavior.
The dynamic of power and powerless was clearly defined and the prisoners coped with it in a variety of ways.
“At first, some prisoners rebelled or fought with the guards. Four prisoners reacted by breaking down emotionally as a way to escape the situation. One prisoner developed a psychosomatic rash over his entire body when he learned that his parole request had been turned down. Others tried to cope by being good prisoners, doing everything the guards wanted them to do. One of them was even nicknamed “Sarge,” because he was so military-like in executing all commands.” ~Stanford Prison Experiment
Watch a documentary on this experiment here:
Today, with lockdowns around the globe the masses have assumed the role of prisoner, forfeiting their individual identity and discernment. Most people go along to get along, but many are assuming the role of prison guard, attacking and harassing those who, for whatever reason, choose not to comply with new mandates about masks and other arbitrary Covid restrictions.
This recent video of a woman throwing hot coffee in the face a guy who was not wearing a mask is telling:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laaiY2qf_BI
3. When people are put into a doctor/patient relationship as the patient, they will develop a sense of helplessness and powerlessness.
The doctor/patient relationship is perhaps the most economically and psychologically exploited relationship in society today. It is the foundation of big pharma’s grip on modern medicine, and it is big business. The influence doctors have over patients is total, and our society is being reshaped with the masses being positioned as patients whom must defer all medical decisions to an elite class of approved doctors and experts.
In a short film, Amazing Polly explains how the medical establishment’s invasion into our bodies amounts to torture and is historically one of the most dangerous forms of psychological control. Not only does it disempower the patient, it also over-glorifies the doctor, who then has an incentive to assert more dominance over the patient.
We’re seeing a manifestation of Munchausen syndrome on mass level, as the populace is kept ill by palliative care and held hostage by the vaccine industry. Rather than being empowered to protect ourselves by caring for the body and the immune system, we are being told to wait helplessly for a vaccine.
This is well laid out in the following video:
http://youtu.be/2deFTjEDgGA
Final Thoughts
One of the most important observations made about the Stanford Experiment is that during the whole thing, not one person realized the changes in their own personality. They were said to have been so wholly wrapped up in the experience, that neither the guards nor prisoners could see the whole picture of what was happening and how they were all changing together.
Which is precisely what is happening now as these psychological dynamics are put into play at the mass level. In response to the new and chronic stressors in our lives, we are re-organizing ourselves to conform, be obedient and be self-policing.
In a 2012 research paper endtitled Contesting the “Nature” Of Conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo’s Studies Really Show, authors Alexander Haslam and Stephen D. Reicher comment:
“…the fundamental point is that tyranny does not flourish because perpetrators are helpless and ignorant of their actions. It flourishes because they actively identify with those who promote vicious acts as virtuous. It is this conviction that steels participants to do their dirty work and that makes them work energetically and creatively to ensure its success.” – Haslam and Reicher
Most people don’t see it. Are you paying attention?
Read more articles by Dylan Charles .
About the Author
Dylan Charles is the editor of Waking Times and host of Battered Souls: A Podcast About Transformation, both dedicated to ideas of personal transformation, societal awakening, and planetary renewal. His personal journey is deeply inspired by shamanic plant medicines and the arts of Kung Fu, Qi Gong and Yoga. After seven years of living in Costa Rica, he now lives in the Blue Ridge Mountains, where he practices Brazilian Jiu Jitsu and enjoys spending time with family. He has written hundreds of articles, reaching and inspiring millions of people around the world.
Dylan is available for interviews and podcasts, and offers his services as a professional life coach to people looking to break free from the patterns and programming that hold them back in life. Contact Dylan at WakingTimes@gmail.com.
This article (3 Ways Human Psychology is Being Exploited to Create an Obedient, Self-Policing Society) was originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Dylan Charles and WakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement.


wakingtimes--2020-08-12--This Is Amerika: Where Fascism, Totalitarianism and Militarism Go Hand In Hand

This Is Amerika : Where Fascism , Totalitarianism and Militarism Go Hand In Hand Get the latest Waking Times articles delivered to your inbox .
Sign up here .
There ’ s a pattern emerging if you pay close enough attention .
Civil discontent leads to civil unrest , which leads to protests and counterprotests .
Without fail , what should be an exercise in how to peacefully disagree turns ugly the moment looting , vandalism , violence , intimidation tactics and rioting are introduced into the equation .
Instead of restoring order , local police stand down .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Charlottesville , Va. , in 2017 , when the city regularly cited as being one of the happiest places in America , became ground zero for a heated war of words—and actions—over racism , “ sanitizing history , ” extremism ( both right and left ) , political correctness , hate speech , partisan politics , and a growing fear that violent words will end in violent actions .
It was a setup : local police deliberately engineered a situation in which protesters would confront each other , tensions would bubble over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enough to call in the bigger guns .
It is the blueprint being used right now .
In Charlottesville , as in so many parts of the country right now , the conflict was over how to reconcile the nation ’ s checkered past , particularly as it relates to slavery , with the push to sanitize the environment of anything—words and images—that might cause offense , especially if it ’ s a Confederate flag or monument .
That fear of offense prompted the Charlottesville City Council to get rid of a statue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had graced one of its public parks for 82 years .
That ’ s when everything went haywire .
In attempting to pacify one particularly vocal and righteously offended group while railroading over the concerns of those with alternate viewpoints , Charlottesville attracted the unwanted attention of the Ku Klux Klan , neo-Nazis and the alt-Right , all of whom descended on the little college town with the intention of exercising their First Amendment right to be disagreeable , to assemble , and to protest .
When put to the test , Charlottesville @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
On August 12 , 2017 , what should have been an exercise in free speech quickly became a brawl that left one dead and dozens more injured .
And then there was the police , who were supposed to uphold the law and prevent violence .
They failed to do either .
Indeed , a 220-page post-mortem of the protests and the Charlottesville government ’ s response by former U.S. attorney Timothy J. Heaphy merely corroborates our worst fears about what drives the government at all levels : power , money , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ presented with a situation in which the government and its agents were tasked with protecting free speech and safety , Heaphy concluded that “ the City of Charlottesville protected neither free expression nor public safety.
” In other words , the government failed to uphold its constitutional mandates .
The police failed to carry out their duties as peace officers .
And the citizens found themselves unable to trust either the police or the government to do its job in respecting their rights and ensuring their safety .
Despite the fact that 1,000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ troopers and members of the National Guard ) —many of whom had been preparing for the downtown rally for months—had been called on to work the event , despite the fact that police in riot gear surrounded Emancipation Park on three sides , and despite the fact that Charlottesville had had what reporter David Graham referred to as “ a dress rehearsal of sorts ” a month earlier when 30 members of the Ku Klux Klan were confronted by 1000 counterprotesters , police failed to do their jobs .
Instead of establishing clear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the First Amendment rights of the protesters , police established two entrances into the permit areas of the park and created barriers “ guiding rallygoers single-file into the park ” past lines of white nationalists and antifa counterprotesters .
Incredibly , when the first signs of open violence broke out , Heaphy reports that the police chief allegedly instructed his staff to “ let them fight , it will make it easier to declare an unlawful assembly.
” This is not much different from what is happening on the present-day national scene .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ this Heaphy report was intended to be an independent investigation of what went right and what went wrong in the government ’ s handling of the protests .
Heaphy found very little to commend .
What went right on Aug. 12 according to Heaphy : 1 ) Despite the presence of firearms , including members of the militia , and angry confrontations between protesters and counterprotesters , no person was shot and no significant property damage occurred ; 2 ) Emergency personnel did their jobs effectively and treated a large number of people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and 3 ) Police intelligence gathering was thorough ( that ’ s the best he had to say about police ) .
Now for what went wrong , according to the report : 1 .
Police failed to get input from other law enforcement agencies experienced in handling large protests .
2 .
Police failed to adequately train their officers in advance of the protest .
3 .
City officials failed to request assistance from outside agencies .
4 .
The City Council unduly interfered by ignoring legal advice , attempting to move @ @ @ @ @ @ @ concerns of law enforcement .
5 .
The city government failed to inform the public about their plans .
6 .
City officials were misguided in allowing weapons at the protest .
7 .
The police implemented a flawed operational plan that failed to protect public safety .
8 .
While police were provided with riot gear , they were never trained in how to use it , nor were they provided with any meaningful field training in how to deal with or de-escalate anticipated violence on the part of protesters .
9 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outside counsel , including The Rutherford Institute , the police failed to employ de-escalation tactics or establish clear barriers between warring factions of protesters .
10 .
Government officials and police leadership opted to advance their own agendas at the expense of constitutional rights and public safety .
11 .
For all intents and purposes , police abided by a stand down order that endangered the community and paved the way for massive civil unrest .
12 .
In failing to protect public safety , police and government officials undermined public faith in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the events that took place in Charlottesville , Virginia , but it applies to almost every branch of government that fails to serve “ we the people.
” As the Pew Research Center revealed , public trust in the government remains near historic lows and with good reason , too .
Rather , this is Amerika , where fascism , totalitarianism and militarism go hand in hand .
What you smell is the stench of a dying republic .
Our dying republic .
The American experiment in freedom is failing fast .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , our ignorance , our intolerance , our disinclination to do the hard work of holding government leaders accountable to the rule of law , our inclination to let politics trump longstanding constitutional principles—we have been reduced to this sorry state in which we are little more than shackled inmates in a prison operated for the profit of a corporate elite .
We have been saddled with the wreckage of a government at all levels that no longer represents the citizenry , serves the citizenry , or is accountable to the citizenry .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re talking about the federal government , state governments , or local governing bodies : at all ends of the spectrum and every point in between , a shift has taken place .
We no longer count for much of anything beyond an occasional electoral vote and as a source of income for the government ’ s ever-burgeoning financial needs .
Everything happening at the national level is playing out at the local level , as well : the violence , the militarization , the intolerance , the lopsided governance , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no say in how their communities are being governed .
As I have warned repeatedly , the architects of the police state have every intention of manipulating this outrage for their own purposes .
Predictably , the police state is allowing these protests , riots and looting to devolve into a situation where enough of the voting populace is so desperate for a return to law and order that they will gladly relinquish some of their freedoms to achieve it .
And that ’ s how the police state will win , no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ White House , and “ we the people ” will continue to lose .
As always , it must start with “ we the people.
” I ’ ve always advised people to think nationally , but act locally .
Yet as Charlottesville made clear , it ’ s hard to make a difference locally when the local government is as deaf , dumb and blind to the needs of its constituents as the national government .
Charlottesville much like the rest of the nation has had its fair share of government leaders @ @ @ @ @ @ @ own aggrandizement , and incapable of prioritizing the needs of their constituents over their own personal and political agendas ; law enforcement officials for whom personal safety , heavy-handed militarized tactics , and power plays trump their duty to serve and protect ; polarized citizens incapable of finding common ground , respecting each other ’ s rights , or agreeing to disagree ; and a community held hostage by political correctness , divisive rhetoric and a growing intolerance for any views that may be unpopular or at odds with the mainstream .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the right conditions to wreak havoc , a precursor of the rage , frustration and fear that is erupting all over the country .
No matter what forces are manipulating these present riots and violent uprisings , however—and there are definitely such forces at play here—none of this would be happening without the government having laid the groundwork .
Clearly , it ’ s time to clean house at all levels of government .
Stop tolerating corruption , graft , intolerance , greed , incompetence , ineptitude , militarism , lawlessness , ignorance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ corpulence , bureaucracy , immorality , depravity , censorship , cruelty , violence , mediocrity , and tyranny .
These are the hallmarks of an institution that is rotten through and through .
Stop holding your nose in order to block out the stench of a rotting institution .
Stop letting the government and its agents treat you like a servant or a slave .
You ’ ve got rights .
We ’ ve all got rights .
This is our country .
This is our government .
No one can take it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ easy for them .
You ’ ve got a better chance of making your displeasure seen and felt and heard within your own community .
But it will take perseverance and unity and a commitment to finding common ground with your fellow citizens .
Right now , as I make clear in my book Battlefield America : The War on the American People , we ’ re making it way too easy for the police state to take over .
Stop being an accessory to the murder of the American republic .
Constitutional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ founder and president of The Rutherford Institute , where this article ( This Is Amerika : Where Fascism , Totalitarianism and Militarism Go Hand In Hand ) was originally published .
He is the author of A Government of Wolves : The Emerging American Police State and The Change Manifesto .

This Is Amerika: Where Fascism, Totalitarianism and Militarism Go Hand In Hand
John W. Whitehead, Rutherford
Waking Times
“In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem, government IS the problem.”—Ronald Reagan
There’s a pattern emerging if you pay close enough attention.
Civil discontent leads to civil unrest, which leads to protests and counterprotests.
Without fail, what should be an exercise in how to peacefully disagree turns ugly the moment looting, vandalism, violence, intimidation tactics and rioting are introduced into the equation. Instead of restoring order, local police stand down.
Tensions rise, violence escalates, and federal armies move in.
Coincidence? I think not.
This was the blueprint used three years ago in Charlottesville, Va., in 2017, when the city regularly cited as being one of the happiest places in America, became ground zero for a heated war of words—and actions—over racism, “sanitizing history,” extremism (both right and left), political correctness, hate speech, partisan politics, and a growing fear that violent words will end in violent actions.
It was a setup: local police deliberately engineered a situation in which protesters would confront each other, tensions would bubble over, and things would turn just violent enough to call in the bigger guns.
It is the blueprint being used right now.
In Charlottesville, as in so many parts of the country right now, the conflict was over how to reconcile the nation’s checkered past, particularly as it relates to slavery, with the push to sanitize the environment of anything—words and images—that might cause offense, especially if it’s a Confederate flag or monument.
That fear of offense prompted the Charlottesville City Council to get rid of a statue of Confederate General Robert E. Lee that had graced one of its public parks for 82 years.
That’s when everything went haywire.
In attempting to pacify one particularly vocal and righteously offended group while railroading over the concerns of those with alternate viewpoints, Charlottesville attracted the unwanted attention of the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis and the alt-Right, all of whom descended on the little college town with the intention of exercising their First Amendment right to be disagreeable, to assemble, and to protest.
When put to the test, Charlottesville did not handle things well at all.
On August 12, 2017, what should have been an exercise in free speech quickly became a brawl that left one dead and dozens more injured.
As the New York Times reported, “Protesters began to mace one another, throwing water bottles and urine-filled balloons — some of which hit reporters — and beating each other with flagpoles, clubs and makeshift weapons. Before long, the downtown area was a melee. People were ducking and covering with a constant stream of projectiles whizzing by our faces, and the air was filled with the sounds of fists and sticks against flesh.”
And then there was the police, who were supposed to uphold the law and prevent violence.
They failed to do either.
Indeed, a 220-page post-mortem of the protests and the Charlottesville government’s response by former U.S. attorney Timothy J. Heaphy merely corroborates our worst fears about what drives the government at all levels: power, money, ego, politics and ambition.
When presented with a situation in which the government and its agents were tasked with protecting free speech and safety, Heaphy concluded that “the City of Charlottesville protected neither free expression nor public safety.”
Heaphy continues: “The City was unable to protect the right of free expression and facilitate the permit holder’s offensive speech. This represents a failure of one of government’s core functions—the protection of fundamental rights. Law enforcement also failed to maintain order and protect citizens from harm, injury, and death. Charlottesville preserved neither of those principles on August 12, which has led to deep distrust of government within this community.”
In other words, the government failed to uphold its constitutional mandates. The police failed to carry out their duties as peace officers. And the citizens found themselves unable to trust either the police or the government to do its job in respecting their rights and ensuring their safety.
Despite the fact that 1,000 first responders (including 300 state police troopers and members of the National Guard)—many of whom had been preparing for the downtown rally for months—had been called on to work the event, despite the fact that police in riot gear surrounded Emancipation Park on three sides, and despite the fact that Charlottesville had had what reporter David Graham referred to as “a dress rehearsal of sorts” a month earlier when 30 members of the Ku Klux Klan were confronted by 1000 counterprotesters, police failed to do their jobs.
In fact, as the Washington Post reports, police “seemed to watch as groups beat each other with sticks and bludgeoned one another with shields… At one point, police appeared to retreat and then watch the beatings before eventually moving in to end the free-for-all, make arrests and tend to the injured.” “Police Stood By As Mayhem Mounted in Charlottesville,” reported ProPublica.
Instead of establishing clear boundaries—buffer zones—between the warring groups and protecting the First Amendment rights of the protesters, police established two entrances into the permit areas of the park and created barriers “guiding rallygoers single-file into the park” past lines of white nationalists and antifa counterprotesters.
Incredibly, when the first signs of open violence broke out, Heaphy reports that the police chief allegedly instructed his staff to “let them fight, it will make it easier to declare an unlawful assembly.”
This is not much different from what is happening on the present-day national scene.
Commissioned by the City of Charlottesville, this Heaphy report was intended to be an independent investigation of what went right and what went wrong in the government’s handling of the protests.
Heaphy found very little to commend.
What went right on Aug. 12 according to Heaphy: 1) Despite the presence of firearms, including members of the militia, and angry confrontations between protesters and counterprotesters, no person was shot and no significant property damage occurred; 2) Emergency personnel did their jobs effectively and treated a large number of people in a short period of time; and 3) Police intelligence gathering was thorough (that’s the best he had to say about police).
Now for what went wrong, according to the report:
1. Police failed to get input from other law enforcement agencies experienced in handling large protests.
2. Police failed to adequately train their officers in advance of the protest.
3. City officials failed to request assistance from outside agencies.
4. The City Council unduly interfered by ignoring legal advice, attempting to move the protesters elsewhere, and ignoring the concerns of law enforcement.
5. The city government failed to inform the public about their plans.
6. City officials were misguided in allowing weapons at the protest.
7. The police implemented a flawed operational plan that failed to protect public safety.
8. While police were provided with riot gear, they were never trained in how to use it, nor were they provided with any meaningful field training in how to deal with or de-escalate anticipated violence on the part of protesters.
9. Despite the input and advice of outside counsel, including The Rutherford Institute, the police failed to employ de-escalation tactics or establish clear barriers between warring factions of protesters.
10. Government officials and police leadership opted to advance their own agendas at the expense of constitutional rights and public safety.
11. For all intents and purposes, police abided by a stand down order that endangered the community and paved the way for massive civil unrest.
12. In failing to protect public safety, police and government officials undermined public faith in the government.
The Heaphy report focused on the events that took place in Charlottesville, Virginia, but it applies to almost every branch of government that fails to serve “we the people.”
As the Pew Research Center revealed, public trust in the government remains near historic lows and with good reason, too.
This isn’t America, land of the free, where the government is “of the people, by the people [and] for the people.”
Rather, this is Amerika, where fascism, totalitarianism and militarism go hand in hand.
What you smell is the stench of a dying republic. Our dying republic.
The American experiment in freedom is failing fast.
Through every fault of our own—our apathy, our ignorance, our intolerance, our disinclination to do the hard work of holding government leaders accountable to the rule of law, our inclination to let politics trump longstanding constitutional principles—we have been reduced to this sorry state in which we are little more than shackled inmates in a prison operated for the profit of a corporate elite.
We have been saddled with the wreckage of a government at all levels that no longer represents the citizenry, serves the citizenry, or is accountable to the citizenry.
“We the people” are not the masters anymore.
It doesn’t matter whether you’re talking about the federal government, state governments, or local governing bodies: at all ends of the spectrum and every point in between, a shift has taken place.
“We the people” are not being seen, heard or valued.
We no longer count for much of anything beyond an occasional electoral vote and as a source of income for the government’s ever-burgeoning financial needs.
Everything happening at the national level is playing out at the local level, as well: the violence, the militarization, the intolerance, the lopsided governance, and an uneasy awareness that the citizenry have no say in how their communities are being governed.
As I have warned repeatedly, the architects of the police state have every intention of manipulating this outrage for their own purposes.
Predictably, the police state is allowing these protests, riots and looting to devolve into a situation where enough of the voting populace is so desperate for a return to law and order that they will gladly relinquish some of their freedoms to achieve it. And that’s how the police state will win, no matter which candidate gets elected to the White House, and “we the people” will continue to lose.
So what’s the answer?
As always, it must start with “we the people.”
I’ve always advised people to think nationally, but act locally.
Yet as Charlottesville made clear, it’s hard to make a difference locally when the local government is as deaf, dumb and blind to the needs of its constituents as the national government.
Charlottesville much like the rest of the nation has had its fair share of government leaders who are tone-deaf, focused on their own aggrandizement, and incapable of prioritizing the needs of their constituents over their own personal and political agendas; law enforcement officials for whom personal safety, heavy-handed militarized tactics, and power plays trump their duty to serve and protect; polarized citizens incapable of finding common ground, respecting each other’s rights, or agreeing to disagree; and a community held hostage by political correctness, divisive rhetoric and a growing intolerance for any views that may be unpopular or at odds with the mainstream.
It was a perfect storm just waiting for the right conditions to wreak havoc, a precursor of the rage, frustration and fear that is erupting all over the country.
No matter what forces are manipulating these present riots and violent uprisings, however—and there are definitely such forces at play here—none of this would be happening without the government having laid the groundwork.
Clearly, it’s time to clean house at all levels of government.
Stop tolerating corruption, graft, intolerance, greed, incompetence, ineptitude, militarism, lawlessness, ignorance, brutality, deceit, collusion, corpulence, bureaucracy, immorality, depravity, censorship, cruelty, violence, mediocrity, and tyranny. These are the hallmarks of an institution that is rotten through and through.
Stop holding your nose in order to block out the stench of a rotting institution.
Stop letting the government and its agents treat you like a servant or a slave.
You’ve got rights. We’ve all got rights. This is our country. This is our government. No one can take it away from us unless we make it easy for them.
You’ve got a better chance of making your displeasure seen and felt and heard within your own community. But it will take perseverance and unity and a commitment to finding common ground with your fellow citizens.
Right now, as I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, we’re making it way too easy for the police state to take over.
Stop being an accessory to the murder of the American republic.
About the Author
Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute, where this article (This Is Amerika: Where Fascism, Totalitarianism and Militarism Go Hand In Hand) was originally published. He is the author of A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State and The Change Manifesto.


wakingtimes--2020-08-12--5 New CBD Studies In 2020 Reveal Why So Many Are Choosing It Over Big Pharma Drugs

5 New CBD Studies In 2020 Reveal Why So Many Are Choosing It Over Big Pharma Drugs Get the latest Waking Times articles delivered to your inbox .
Sign up here .
The free market has spoken .
Americans prefer cannabis-related products to Big Pharma drugs for a host of ailments .
They ’ re choosing cannabis because it works for them and now science is beginning to back them up .
The cannabis plant is proving to be very beneficial to human health despite the federal government ’ s continued prohibition as a Schedule 1 controlled substance .
Schedule @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accepted medical use ” and a “ high potential for abuse.
” Yet governments can no longer deny the evidence that cannabis is an effective treatment for many things without harmful side effects .
Although the legality of cannabis remains murky in the United States , CBD ( Cannabidiol ) products have exploded in popularity due to its status as a dietary supplement .
Recent studies are frankly making the feds look foolish , especially studies about CBD flowers and derivatives without THC that have practically no “ potential for abuse ” because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” typically associated with smoking cannabis .
Low-THC , high-CBD strains first burst onto the scene under the name “ Charlotte ’ s Web ” named for a young girl who used it to treat her severe epilepsy with significantly fewer side effects than available pharmaceuticals .
Charlotte ’ s Web had less than 0.3 % THC .
It was so effective that the FDA approved CBD use to treat seizures even for children two and older in 2018 .
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today approved Epidiolex ( cannabidiol ) [ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of seizures associated with two rare and severe forms of epilepsy , Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and Dravet syndrome , in patients two years of age and older .
This is the first FDA-approved drug that contains a purified drug substance derived from marijuana .
It is also the first FDA approval of a drug for the treatment of patients with Dravet syndrome .
“ Because of the adequate and well-controlled clinical studies that supported this approval , prescribers can have confidence in the drug ’ s uniform strength and consistent delivery that support appropriate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ complex and serious epilepsy syndromes , ” remarked FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb , M.D .
at the time .
As a result of the Hemp Farming Act , proposed by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President Donald Trump in 2018 , CBD products are now widely available in the United States including smokable buds from places like Mybud Shop .
The Hemp Farming Act also enabled several new “ well-controlled ” studies showing the amazing promise of cannabis without THC .
Here are five studies published in medical journals in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for humans and pets .
A pilot study published in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology last month showed that CBD significantly improved severe behavioral problems in young people with intellectual disabilities like autism with few side effects .
Researchers from Murdoch Children ’ s Research Institute ( MCRI ) “ recorded a clinically significant change in participants ’ irritability , aggression , self-injury , and yelling .
The intervention was also found to be safe and well-tolerated by most study participants , ” according to the press release about the findings .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ by desperate parents dealing with autism and other neurological issues who have been giving their autistic children unregulated cannabis .
A University of New Mexico study from May 2020 revealed that CBD dramatically reduced neuropathic pain in mice .
Research showed that legal hemp oil reduced mechanical pain sensitivity 10-fold for several hours in mice with chronic post-operative neuropathic pain .
For several hours after Cannabis consumption the mice demonstrated effective pain relief , approaching the mechanical pain sensitivity of naïve control mice that did not undergo the surgical operation .
“ Our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mimicking human neuropathic pain that has allowed demonstration of hemp ’ s reversal of the pain-related behavior , ” said one of the lead investigators , Dr. Karin N. Westlund , Department of Anesthesiology .
“ Cannabis plants with low THC are still psychoactive , but tend to result in less psychedelic experiences , while still offering profound and often immediate relief from symptoms such as pain , anxiety , and depression , ” says co-researcher , Dr. Jacob Miguel Vigil , associate professor in the UNM Psychology Department .
Another study from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ significantly improved symptoms in dogs suffering from arthritis which may indicate the similar results for humans .
The study concluded : Published in the journal PAIN , the study first showed both in laboratory tests and mouse models that CBD , a non-addictive product derived from hemp ( cannabis ) , can significantly reduce the production of inflammatory molecules and immune cells associated with arthritis .
Subsequently , the study showed that in dogs diagnosed with the condition , CBD treatment significantly improved quality of life as documented by both owner and veterinarian @ @ @ @ @ @ @ evaluation of CBD for human arthritis .
“ CBD is rapidly increasing in popularity due to its anecdotal health benefits for a variety of conditions , from reducing anxiety to helping with movement disorders , ” said corresponding author Dr. Matthew Halpert , research faculty in the Department of Pathology and Immunology at Baylor .
“ We studied dogs because experimental evidence shows that spontaneous models of arthritis , particularly in domesticated canine models , are more appropriate for assessing human arthritis pain treatments than other animal models .
The biological characteristics of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the human condition , ” Halpert added .
In March of this year the University of Southern Denmark published a study in the journal Scientific Reports which showed Cannabidiol ( CBD ) fights antibiotic resistant bacteria .
In the study , CBD was used to enhance the effect of the antibiotic bacitracin against Staphylococcus aureus bacteria ; a major human pathogen that frequently causes community- and hospital-acquired disease .
“ When we combined CBD and antibiotics , we saw a more powerful effect than when treating with antibiotics alone .
So , in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bacteria , we needed less antibiotics , ” researchers said .
Three things happened with the Staphylococcus aureus bacteria , when the researchers treated them with the combination in their study : The bacteria could no longer divide normally .
The expression of certain key genes ( cell division and autolysis genes ) in the bacteria was lowered .
If that isn ’ t incredible enough , an April study by researchers at Colorado State University has shown CBD ’ s promise in fighting aggressive brain cancer !
Behavioral problems , pain , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cancer are all now part of a growing list of diseases and ailments that are being treated by this natural remedy with almost no side effects .
It ’ s true that the budding CBD industry is funding most of these early studies , but the results that many people are experiencing first hand are beginning to be revealed by science .
This article ( 5 New CBD Studies In 2020 Reveal Why So Many Are Choosing It Over Big Pharma Drugs ) was originally created and published by Activist Post and is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with attribution .
It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution , author bio , and this copyright statement .
Disclaimer : This article is not intended to provide medical advice , diagnosis or treatment .
Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of WakingTimes or its staff .

5 New CBD Studies In 2020 Reveal Why So Many Are Choosing It Over Big Pharma Drugs
Steven Maxwell, Contributor
Waking Times
The free market has spoken. Americans prefer cannabis-related products to Big Pharma drugs for a host of ailments. They’re choosing cannabis because it works for them and now science is beginning to back them up.
The cannabis plant is proving to be very beneficial to human health despite the federal government’s continued prohibition as a Schedule 1 controlled substance. Schedule 1 classification substances have “no currently accepted medical use” and a “high potential for abuse.” Yet governments can no longer deny the evidence that cannabis is an effective treatment for many things without harmful side effects.
Although the legality of cannabis remains murky in the United States, CBD (Cannabidiol) products have exploded in popularity due to its status as a dietary supplement. Recent studies are frankly making the feds look foolish, especially studies about CBD flowers and derivatives without THC that have practically no “potential for abuse” because they do not cause a “high” typically associated with smoking cannabis.
Low-THC, high-CBD strains first burst onto the scene under the name “Charlotte’s Web” named for a young girl who used it to treat her severe epilepsy with significantly fewer side effects than available pharmaceuticals. Charlotte’s Web had less than 0.3% THC. It was so effective that the FDA approved CBD use to treat seizures even for children two and older in 2018.
From the FDA announcement:
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today approved Epidiolex (cannabidiol) [CBD] oral solution for the treatment of seizures associated with two rare and severe forms of epilepsy, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and Dravet syndrome, in patients two years of age and older. This is the first FDA-approved drug that contains a purified drug substance derived from marijuana. It is also the first FDA approval of a drug for the treatment of patients with Dravet syndrome. “Because of the adequate and well-controlled clinical studies that supported this approval, prescribers can have confidence in the drug’s uniform strength and consistent delivery that support appropriate dosing needed for treating patients with these complex and serious epilepsy syndromes,” remarked FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D. at the time.
As a result of the Hemp Farming Act, proposed by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President Donald Trump in 2018, CBD products are now widely available in the United States including smokable buds from places like Mybud Shop.
The Hemp Farming Act also enabled several new “well-controlled” studies showing the amazing promise of cannabis without THC. Here are five studies published in medical journals in 2020 showing CBD’s diverse treatments for humans and pets.
Study 1: CBD Improves Severe Behavioral Associated with Autism
A pilot study published in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology last month showed that CBD significantly improved severe behavioral problems in young people with intellectual disabilities like autism with few side effects.
Researchers from Murdoch Children’s Research Institute (MCRI) “recorded a clinically significant change in participants’ irritability, aggression, self-injury, and yelling. The intervention was also found to be safe and well-tolerated by most study participants,” according to the press release about the findings.
“Current medications carry a high risk of side-effects, with vulnerable people with intellectual disability being less able to report side-effects,” said Associate Professor at MCRI, Daryl Efron, who led the study. “Common side-effects of antipsychotics, such as weight gain and metabolic syndrome, have huge health effects for a patient group already at increased risk of chronic illness.”
Efron added that research is being spurred by desperate parents dealing with autism and other neurological issues who have been giving their autistic children unregulated cannabis.
Study 2: CBD Reduces Post-Operative Pain By 10-Fold
A University of New Mexico study from May 2020 revealed that CBD dramatically reduced neuropathic pain in mice. Research showed that legal hemp oil reduced mechanical pain sensitivity 10-fold for several hours in mice with chronic post-operative neuropathic pain.
For several hours after Cannabis consumption the mice demonstrated effective pain relief, approaching the mechanical pain sensitivity of naïve control mice that did not undergo the surgical operation. “Our lab utilizes a unique nerve injury model mimicking human neuropathic pain that has allowed demonstration of hemp’s reversal of the pain-related behavior,” said one of the lead investigators, Dr. Karin N. Westlund, Department of Anesthesiology. “Cannabis plants with low THC are still psychoactive, but tend to result in less psychedelic experiences, while still offering profound and often immediate relief from symptoms such as pain, anxiety, and depression,” says co-researcher, Dr. Jacob Miguel Vigil, associate professor in the UNM Psychology Department.
Study 3: CBD Significantly Reduces Arthritis Symptoms in Dogs
Another study from April by Baylor University found that CBD significantly improved symptoms in dogs suffering from arthritis which may indicate the similar results for humans. The study concluded:
Published in the journal PAIN, the study first showed both in laboratory tests and mouse models that CBD, a non-addictive product derived from hemp (cannabis), can significantly reduce the production of inflammatory molecules and immune cells associated with arthritis. Subsequently, the study showed that in dogs diagnosed with the condition, CBD treatment significantly improved quality of life as documented by both owner and veterinarian assessments. This work supports future scientific evaluation of CBD for human arthritis. “CBD is rapidly increasing in popularity due to its anecdotal health benefits for a variety of conditions, from reducing anxiety to helping with movement disorders,” said corresponding author Dr. Matthew Halpert, research faculty in the Department of Pathology and Immunology at Baylor. “We studied dogs because experimental evidence shows that spontaneous models of arthritis, particularly in domesticated canine models, are more appropriate for assessing human arthritis pain treatments than other animal models. The biological characteristics of arthritis in dogs closely resemble those of the human condition,” Halpert added.
Study 4: CBD Helps Fight Resistant Bacteria
In March of this year the University of Southern Denmark published a study in the journal Scientific Reports which showed Cannabidiol (CBD) fights antibiotic resistant bacteria.
In the study, CBD was used to enhance the effect of the antibiotic bacitracin against Staphylococcus aureus bacteria; a major human pathogen that frequently causes community- and hospital-acquired disease. “When we combined CBD and antibiotics, we saw a more powerful effect than when treating with antibiotics alone. So, in order to kill a certain number of bacteria, we needed less antibiotics,” researchers said. Three things happened with the Staphylococcus aureus bacteria, when the researchers treated them with the combination in their study: The bacteria could no longer divide normally. The expression of certain key genes (cell division and autolysis genes) in the bacteria was lowered. The bacterial membrane became unstable.
Study 5: CBD Kills Brain Cancer Cells
If that isn’t incredible enough, an April study by researchers at Colorado State University has shown CBD’s promise in fighting aggressive brain cancer!
Findings from a new study examining human and canine brain cancer cells suggest that cannabidiol could be a useful therapy for a difficult-to-treat brain cancer. Cannabidiol, or CBD, is a non-psychoactive chemical compound derived from marijuana. The study looked at glioblastoma, an often-deadly form of brain cancer that grows and spreads very quickly. Even with major advancements in treatment, survival rates for this cancer have not improved significantly. “Our work shows that CBD has the potential to provide an effective, synergistic glioblastoma therapy option and that it should continue to be vigorously studied,” said Chase Gross, a student in the Doctor of Veterinary Medicine/Master of Science program at Colorado State University. “Our experiments showed that CBD slows cancer cell growth and is toxic to both canine and human glioblastoma cell lines,” Gross added. “Importantly, the differences in anti-cancer effects between CBD isolate and extract appear to be negligible.”
Behavioral problems, pain, arthritis, drug-resistant bacteria, and brain cancer are all now part of a growing list of diseases and ailments that are being treated by this natural remedy with almost no side effects. It’s true that the budding CBD industry is funding most of these early studies, but the results that many people are experiencing first hand are beginning to be revealed by science.
About the Author
Steven Maxwell writes for ActivistPost.com.
This article (5 New CBD Studies In 2020 Reveal Why So Many Are Choosing It Over Big Pharma Drugs) was originally created and published by Activist Post and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement.
Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of WakingTimes or its staff.


wakingtimes--2020-08-12--The China Lockdown – Origin of the War Against the Population of Earth, Pretense of Containing the V

The China Lockdown – Origin of the War Against the Population of Earth , Pretense of Containing the Virus Get the latest Waking Times articles delivered to your inbox .
Sign up here .
Yes , once again , dear reader , we buckle up and venture into the mad , mad world where no one proved a new and unique coronavirus exists , but where all leaders assume it does .
Brief background : once a person accepts the notion that a new virus is exploding in epic fashion across the world , he is committed to a few @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The most important one : nothing will stop the virus except the acquisition of natural immunity by the population .
And how would this natural immunity be gained ?
Through mass exposure to the germ .
In other words , living life is the answer .
Not containment .
Not lockdowns .
The genie does not go back in the bottle .
During lockdowns , millions of people would , sitting in their homes , percolate the virus—and once let out of prison , the spread would escalate unchecked .
Everywhere .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a correct picture ( of their “ virus world ” ) , read numerous public health and press accounts detailing how quickly this supposed germ advanced across the planet .
A lightning strike here , a lightning strike there , a strike everywhere .
Again—the only method for victory would be mass exposure , through living , leading to mass immunity .
This is the implication of accepting the notion of a new virus rushing out from a source .
So the Chinese regime achieved nothing by locking down 50 million people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the mass lockdown model was soon copied by every nation on Earth .
Amidst bursts of ecstasy , the World Health Organization and the CDC had their decades-long dream realized : CONTROL .
Medical dictatorship pressing down on billions of people .
There is more to say about the Chinese lockdown .
Even falsely assuming a new virus was discovered , how did Chinese authorities diagnose the early cases ?
They had a limited number of PCR test kits .
Those they did have would register many false positives , based on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the PCR does .
On top of that , Chinese researchers and doctors were claiming pneumonia was the cardinal symptom of the new epidemic .
But studies indicate roughly 300,000 people in China die every year of pneumonia—going back long before the supposed emergence of the new virus .
Early in 2020 , China health authorities announced they were resorting to a different diagnostic test : CT scans of the lungs .
Really ?
To detect the presence of a new virus ?
What test could be more irrelevant ?
It would be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with a blindfold on searching for a needle in a haystack in Detroit .
But nothing deterred the WHO/CDC or Bill Gates or Anthony Fauci or Donald Trump or the motley collection of political leaders around the globe .
Lockdowns were laid on .
Still more : If Chinese virologists working in their Wuhan labs trying to characterize “ the new coronavirus ” had merely looked out the window , they would have seen the cause of the pneumonia in the city : rank deadly air pollution .
In the summer of 2019 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of several large Chinese cities , including Wuhan , had gone out into the streets protesting the air quality , which contains an unprecedented toxic mix of early industrial and modern industrial compounds .
But this fact was ignored .
Instead , 50 million Chinese were imprisoned—ending those street protests , as well as the Hong Kong rebellion .
Non-discovery of a new virus ; lockdown of 50 million people , the wrong action for producing immunity against a virus ; the emulation of that action across the world ; and here we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and comb through statements of mainstream epidemiologists who are supposed to be on “ the good side of the argument.
” Of course , they all believe in the existence of the virus .
I was not impressed by their remarks .
At some point they appear to gargle and choke and recommend half-measures .
We should open up this but lock down that .
We could have put in place more stringent measures early on .
They dance around the fact that , once you accept the existence of a new virus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is only one cure : the acquisition of mass immunity .
And you get that by living .
Exposing yourself to the germ .
You can ’ t dance your way out of it .
I ’ ve never accepted the existence of a new virus .
I ’ ve written close to two hundred articles painting an entirely different picture of what is going on , and I ’ ve presented a great deal of evidence for my view .
I continue to do that .
Postscript : I haven ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ believe injecting seven billion people is both doable and effective .
Stepping into their world of fantasy and pseudoscience , even their own experts are now claiming COVID immunity—which they measure by antibody response—wanes quickly .
A vaccine would need to be injected in annual boosters , just as the seasonal flu vaccine is .
So how are they doing with that flu vaccine ?
They report millions of flu cases and hundreds of thousands of deaths EVERY YEAR .
If that ’ s mass immunity , a chicken is a rocket ship @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up seven billion people every year and still not attain immunity ?
A twisted pipe dream , even if you accept conventional vaccine theory—and I don ’ t .
We ’ re not even getting into devastating vaccine “ adverse effects , ” a subject I ’ ve been writing about and exposing for 30 years .
Suffice to say , Vaccine King Bill Gates is not only a raging sociopath , he ’ s wrong about his own “ science.
” Judging by the failure of the flu vaccine , the logic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the conclusion that a severe and permanent and forever lockdown of the global population is necessary .
Unless and until the population could be reduced to an exceedingly minor fraction of its present total .
Now , if a vaccination could accomplish THAT… Jon Rappoport is the author of three explosive collections , THE MATRIX REVEALED , EXIT FROM THE MATRIX , and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX , Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29thDistrict of California .
He maintains a consulting practice for private clients , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ personal creative power .
Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize , he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years , writing articles on politics , medicine , and health for CBS Healthwatch , LA Weekly , Spin Magazine , Stern , and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe .
Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics , health , logic , and creative power to audiences around the world .
You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com or OutsideTheRealityMachine .
This article ( The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against the population of Earth , pretense of containing the virus ) was originally created and published by Jon Rappaport ’ s Blog and is re-posted here with permission .
Like Waking Times on Facebook .
Follow Waking Times on Twitter .

The China Lockdown – Origin of the War Against the Population of Earth, Pretense of Containing the Virus
Jon Rappoport, Guest
Waking Times
Yes, once again, dear reader, we buckle up and venture into the mad, mad world where no one proved a new and unique coronavirus exists, but where all leaders assume it does.
Brief background: once a person accepts the notion that a new virus is exploding in epic fashion across the world, he is committed to a few inescapable propositions that flow from this assumption. The most important one: nothing will stop the virus except the acquisition of natural immunity by the population.
And how would this natural immunity be gained? Through mass exposure to the germ. In other words, living life is the answer.
Not containment. Not lockdowns. The genie does not go back in the bottle.
During lockdowns, millions of people would, sitting in their homes, percolate the virus—and once let out of prison, the spread would escalate unchecked. Everywhere.
If you don’t think that is a correct picture (of their “virus world”), read numerous public health and press accounts detailing how quickly this supposed germ advanced across the planet. A lightning strike here, a lightning strike there, a strike everywhere.
For example, medicalxpress.com, July 30, 2020, reports on a CDC study published in The Lancet: “During the first 11 weeks of the COVID-19 outbreak, 32,459 COVID-19 cases were identified from 99 countries and locations outside mainland China.” Try putting that back in the bottle.
Again—the only method for victory would be mass exposure, through living, leading to mass immunity.
This is the implication of accepting the notion of a new virus rushing out from a source.
So the Chinese regime achieved nothing by locking down 50 million people. Less than nothing.
Of course, the mass lockdown model was soon copied by every nation on Earth. Amidst bursts of ecstasy, the World Health Organization and the CDC had their decades-long dream realized: CONTROL. Medical dictatorship pressing down on billions of people.
There is more to say about the Chinese lockdown. Even falsely assuming a new virus was discovered, how did Chinese authorities diagnose the early cases? They had a limited number of PCR test kits. Those they did have would register many false positives, based on cross-reactions with harmless coronaviruses—because that is what the PCR does.
On top of that, Chinese researchers and doctors were claiming pneumonia was the cardinal symptom of the new epidemic. But studies indicate roughly 300,000 people in China die every year of pneumonia—going back long before the supposed emergence of the new virus.
Early in 2020, China health authorities announced they were resorting to a different diagnostic test: CT scans of the lungs. Really? To detect the presence of a new virus? What test could be more irrelevant? It would be on the order of walking around Beijing with a blindfold on searching for a needle in a haystack in Detroit.
But nothing deterred the WHO/CDC or Bill Gates or Anthony Fauci or Donald Trump or the motley collection of political leaders around the globe. Lockdowns were laid on.
Still more: If Chinese virologists working in their Wuhan labs trying to characterize “the new coronavirus” had merely looked out the window, they would have seen the cause of the pneumonia in the city: rank deadly air pollution.
In the summer of 2019, risking arrest and disappearance, residents of several large Chinese cities, including Wuhan, had gone out into the streets protesting the air quality, which contains an unprecedented toxic mix of early industrial and modern industrial compounds.
But this fact was ignored. Instead, 50 million Chinese were imprisoned—ending those street protests, as well as the Hong Kong rebellion.
Non-discovery of a new virus; lockdown of 50 million people, the wrong action for producing immunity against a virus; the emulation of that action across the world; and here we are.
I decided to go back and comb through statements of mainstream epidemiologists who are supposed to be on “the good side of the argument.” Of course, they all believe in the existence of the virus.
I was not impressed by their remarks. At some point they appear to gargle and choke and recommend half-measures. We should open up this but lock down that. We could have put in place more stringent measures early on. They dance around the fact that, once you accept the existence of a new virus launching out into the world, there is only one cure: the acquisition of mass immunity. And you get that by living. Exposing yourself to the germ.
You can’t dance your way out of it.
I’ve never accepted the existence of a new virus. I’ve written close to two hundred articles painting an entirely different picture of what is going on, and I’ve presented a great deal of evidence for my view. I continue to do that.
Postscript: I haven’t forgotten about the vaccination addicts who actually believe injecting seven billion people is both doable and effective. Stepping into their world of fantasy and pseudoscience, even their own experts are now claiming COVID immunity—which they measure by antibody response—wanes quickly.
A vaccine would need to be injected in annual boosters, just as the seasonal flu vaccine is. So how are they doing with that flu vaccine? They report millions of flu cases and hundreds of thousands of deaths EVERY YEAR. If that’s mass immunity, a chicken is a rocket ship.
They’re going to shoot up seven billion people every year and still not attain immunity? A twisted pipe dream, even if you accept conventional vaccine theory—and I don’t.
We’re not even getting into devastating vaccine “adverse effects,” a subject I’ve been writing about and exposing for 30 years.
Suffice to say, Vaccine King Bill Gates is not only a raging sociopath, he’s wrong about his own “science.”
Judging by the failure of the flu vaccine, the logic of his position would drive him to the conclusion that a severe and permanent and forever lockdown of the global population is necessary. Unless and until the population could be reduced to an exceedingly minor fraction of its present total.
Now, if a vaccination could accomplish THAT…
About the Author
Jon Rappoport is the author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29thDistrict of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com or OutsideTheRealityMachine.
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)
This article (The China lockdown: origin of the war against the population of Earth, pretense of containing the virus) was originally created and published by Jon Rappaport’s Blog and is re-posted here with permission.