thelibertydaily--2020-02-08--Project Veritas: Twitter Suspended James O’Keefe to ‘Prevent the Next Trump Situation’

Twitter locked the account of investigative journalist James O ’ Keefe last month , after he and Project Veritas released undercover footage showing Bernie Sanders staffers praising Stalin ’ s gulags and promising that “ cities will burn ” if Donald Trump is re-elected .
According to Project Veritas , “ Twitter ’ s end game is likely similar to that of their Silicon Valley friend Google ; in the words of Google ’ s Head of Innovation Jen Gennai ‘ Prevent the next Trump situation.
’ ” Twitter claims it locked O ’ Keefe ’ s account because of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ Keefe posted a publicly available FEC paystub of one of the Sanders staffers who praised violence and gulags .
“ At Project Veritas we respect the rights of privacy , ” said O ’ Keefe in a statement to Breitbart News .
“ Professional codes of ethics instruct journalists to minimize harm to the public , requiring an “ overriding ” public interest to invade someone ’ s privacy.
” “ In the case of our recent Twitter suspension , Twitter said we had violated their rules for ‘ posting private information.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ a screen shot from a U.S Government website , certainly not private .
But even if it was private , the information did met the threshold of ‘ overriding ’ public interest.
” Bernie 2020 Staffer Kyle Jurek was recorded by Project Veritas saying things such as : “ Fucking cities will burn if Trump is re-elected.
” “ There ’ s a reason Joseph Stalin had Gulags , right ?
And actually , Gulags are a lot better than what the CIA has told us they were… ” “ The cops are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ getting f*cking beaten in Milwaukee .
They ’ re gon na call up the National Guard for that sh*t. I promise you that.
” “ I ’ m ready to throw down now .
I don ’ t want to wait and have to wait for fucking DNC…The billionaire class .
The fucking media , pundits .
Walk into that MSNBC studios , drag those motherfuckers out by their hair and light them on fire in the streets.
” “ The only thing that fascists understand is violence .
So , the only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ violence.
” “ The information posted was not private ; it is publicly available and found easily on the FEC website ( found here ) .
, ” said a spokesman for Project Veritas .
“ In correcting the false reporting of Washington Post reporter Dave Weigel who had claimed that subjects featured in our recent # Expose2020 series were Bernie ‘ volunteers , ’ we replied to him by posting the FEC paystub of Kyle Jurek .
Within minutes Weigel was forced to retract his false tweet.
” “ Twitter suspended the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are political reasons , they are worried about the effectiveness of our mission here at Project Veritas , ” continued the spokesman .
“ Even their new policies seem to reflect an attack on what we do , and open up the possibility of permanent suspension.
” “ Twitter would never do this to the NYT , WaPO or CNN .
In fact CNN regularly targets people at their homes.
” “ Twitter ’ s end game is likely similar to that of their Silicon Valley friend Google ; in the words of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gennai ‘ Prevent the next Trump situation.
’ ” “ Social media censorship is absolutely getting worse by the day and it will seemingly only continue on these major platforms until real replacements begin to take significant market share.
” This is not the first time Twitter has targeted Project Veritas in the wake of its investigative reporting .
The organization ’ s account was briefly suspended last year after its publication of internal documents from the imagesharing website Pinterest that revealed a blacklist against conservative content .
Twitter has also blocked Project @ @ @ @ @ @ @ new journalists .
In a comment to Breitbart News , Twitter confirmed that they temporarily locked O ’ Keefe ’ s account for “ violating our private information policy .
”

Twitter locked the account of investigative journalist James O’Keefe last month after he and Project Veritas released undercover footage showing Bernie Sanders staffers praising Stalin’s gulags and promising that “cities will burn” if Donald Trump is re-elected. According to Project Veritas, “Twitter’s end game is likely similar to that of their Silicon Valley friend Google; in the words of Google’s Head of Innovation Jen Gennai ‘Prevent the next Trump situation.’”
Twitter claims it locked O’Keefe’s account because of “privacy violations,” after O’Keefe posted a publicly available FEC paystub of one of the Sanders’ staffers who praised violence and gulags.
Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe blasted Twitter for suggesting his tweet violated anyone’s privacy.
“At Project Veritas we respect the rights of privacy,” said O’Keefe in a statement to Breitbart News. “Professional codes of ethics instruct journalists to minimize harm to the public, requiring an “overriding” public interest to invade someone’s privacy.”
“In the case of our recent Twitter suspension, Twitter said we had violated their rules for ‘posting private information.’ But the information we published was a screen shot from a U.S Government website, certainly not private. But even if it was private, the information did meet the threshold of ‘overriding’ public interest.”
Bernie 2020 Staffer Kyle Jurek was recorded by Project Veritas saying things such as:
“Fucking cities will burn if Trump is re-elected.”
“There’s a reason Joseph Stalin had Gulags, right? And actually, Gulags are a lot better than what the CIA has told us they were…”
“The cops are gonna be the ones that are getting f*cking beaten in Milwaukee. They’re gonna call up the National Guard for that sh*t. I promise you that.”
“I’m ready to throw down now. I don’t want to wait and have to wait for fucking DNC … The billionaire class. The fucking media, pundits. Walk into that MSNBC studios, drag those motherfuckers out by their hair and light them on fire in the streets.”
“The only thing that fascists understand is violence. So, the only way you can confront them is with violence.”
“The information posted was not private; it is publicly available and found easily on the FEC website (found here),” said a spokesman for Project Veritas.
“In correcting the false reporting of Washington Post reporter Dave Weigel who had claimed that subjects featured in our recent #Expose2020 series were Bernie ‘volunteers,’ we replied to him by posting the FEC paystub of Kyle Jurek. Within minutes Weigel was forced to retract his false tweet.”
“Twitter suspended the account for what one can only assume are political reasons, they are worried about the effectiveness of our mission here at Project Veritas,” continued the spokesman. “Even their new policies seem to reflect an attack on what we do, and open up the possibility of permanent suspension.”
“Twitter would never do this to the NYT, WaPO or CNN. In fact CNN regularly targets people at their homes.”
“Twitter’s end game is likely similar to that of their Silicon Valley friend Google; in the words of Google’s Head of Innovation Jen Gennai ‘Prevent the next Trump situation.’”
“Social media censorship is absolutely getting worse by the day and it will seemingly only continue on these major platforms until real replacements begin to take significant market share.”
This is not the first time Twitter has targeted Project Veritas in the wake of its investigative reporting. The organization’s account was briefly suspended last year after its publication of internal documents from the imagesharing website Pinterest that revealed a blacklist against conservative content. Twitter has also blocked Project Veritas from running ads aimed at recruiting new journalists.
In a comment to Breitbart News, Twitter confirmed that they temporarily locked O’Keefe’s account for “violating our private information policy.”
Are you an insider at Google, Facebook, Twitter, or any other tech company who wants to confidentially reveal wrongdoing or political bias at your company? Reach out to Allum Bokhari at his secure email address allumbokhari@protonmail.com


thelibertydaily--2020-02-08--Lori Loughlin Prosecutors Say She Expects they Have Telepathy and Time Travel Skills

Lori Loughlin says the government has withheld key evidence proving her innocence in the college admissions scandal , but the government has just fired back ... sarcastically responding that the so-called exculpatory evidence was a statement that the witness had not even made when Lori started complaining .
TMZ broke the story ... Lori and her husband , Mossimo Giannulli , claimed the U.S. Attorney intentionally withheld evidence showing they were giving money to USC and unaware any of the $ 500,000 was used to bribe University officials .
The government just responded , saying there is no such evidence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , saying , `` the absence of such evidence is a result of their criminal conduct , not any government disclosure violations . ''
And , now prosecutors get nasty .
They say some of the information that was just handed over -- evidence Lori claims was wrongly withheld -- is from interviews conducted with witnesses very recently .
Prosecutors say in the legal docs ... `` The government has broad powers , but they do not include mental telepathy or time travel .
The government can not disclose witness statements before the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ goes on to say no University officials condoned the scheme .

Lori Loughlin says the government has withheld key evidence proving her innocence in the college admissions scandal, but the government has just fired back ... sarcastically responding that the so-called exculpatory evidence was a statement that the witness had not even made when Lori started complaining.
TMZ broke the story ... Lori and her husband, Mossimo Giannulli, claimed the U.S. Attorney intentionally withheld evidence showing they were giving money to USC and unaware any of the $500,000 was used to bribe University officials.
The government just responded, saying there is no such evidence being withheld, and then doubling down, saying, "the absence of such evidence is a result of their criminal conduct, not any government disclosure violations."
And, now prosecutors get nasty. They say some of the information that was just handed over -- evidence Lori claims was wrongly withheld -- is from interviews conducted with witnesses very recently. Prosecutors say in the legal docs ... "The government has broad powers, but they do not include mental telepathy or time travel. The government cannot disclose witness statements before the witnesses make them."


thelibertydaily--2020-02-07--Dirty, Phony Anti-Trump Dossier Author, Foreign Spy Christopher Steele is Butthurt President Trump i

Dirty, Phony Anti-Trump Dossier Author, Foreign Spy Christopher Steele is Butthurt President Trump is Exposing His Role in the Deep State Coup, Obama Spygate Scandals

• Christopher Steele ’ s intelligence firm responded to President Trump ’ s comments on Thursday about the “ fake dossier.
” • Orbis Business Intelligence , Steele ’ s London-based company , said that Trump made “ false claims ” about the dossier .
• The dossier was all but debunked by the special counsel ’ s report and DOJ inspector general ’ s report .
• The inspector general blasted the FBI for its handling of information from Steele , who investigated Trump on behalf of the Clinton campaign and DNC .
Christopher Steele ’ s private intelligence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ President Trump of making “ false claims ” during a White House speech Thursday about the former British spy ’ s infamous dossier , which has come under intense scrutiny following a Justice Department inspector general ( IG ) report .
“ He wildly exaggerated our fees and , contrary to his claims we have never stated any of our reporting is ‘ fake ’ .
We stand by the integrity of our research on Kremlin interference in the 2016 election and support for Trump , ” the tweet continued .
Trump blasted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a White House speech on Thursday .
“ So we had a campaign , little did we know we were running against some very , very bad and evil people with fake dossiers with all of these horrible , dirty cops that took these dossiers and did bad things , ” Trump said .
( RELATED : Trump Blasts ‘ Fake Dossiers ’ And FISA Court ) Steele , a former MI6 officer , investigated Trump and members of his campaign in 2016 on behalf of the Clinton campaign and DNC .
He @ @ @ @ @ @ @ FBI , which used parts of the dossier to obtain surveillance warrants against Trump campaign adviser Carter Page .
In the dossier , Steele alleged that Page was a key player in a “ well-developed conspiracy of cooperation ” between the Trump campaign and Russian government .
He also claimed that the Kremlin had cultivated Trump for years , and that the campaign was involved in and aware of the hack of Democrats ’ emails released through WikiLeaks .
Steele ’ s Trump-related claims were all but debunked by the special counsel ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ general ’ s report on the FBI ’ s surveillance of Page .
The special counsel found no evidence of a Trump-Russia conspiracy , or that anyone on the Trump campaign was a Russian agent .
The report also said that nobody on the campaign was involved in the theft of Democrats ’ emails .
It said that Steele ’ s primary source of information told the FBI in January 2017 that information in the dossier was inaccurate or embellished .
Steele himself told his FBI contacts on Oct. 3 , 2016 that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the dossier was a “ boaster ” and “ embellisher.
” The IG report blasted the FBI for relying on Steele ’ s information , and for failing to disclose its flaws to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court , which authorized four surveillance orders against Page .
The report also said that some of Steele ’ s associates told FBI agents in November and December 2016 that the retired spook had shown poor judgement in the past .
In response to Trump , Orbis cited analysis from a former CIA officer and a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ critical of the president .
“ For a detailed , balanced assessment of our 2016 work take a look at this from former CIA officer and Russia expert John Sipher , ” Orbis said , pointing to a Sept. 6 , 2017 report that Sipher published at Just Security .
In an early version of the article , Sipher falsely claimed that a Sept. 23 , 2016 news article at Yahoo !
News provided independent verification of Steele ’ s work .
The Yahoo !
piece , written by Michael Isikoff , said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whether Carter Page met with Kremlin insiders Igor Sechin and Igor Diveykin during a trip to Moscow in July 2016 .
Sipher , a former CIA officer , asserted that the article bolstered the dossier ’ s credibility .
But Sipher corrected the article after The Daily Caller notified Just Security that Isikoff ’ s article was based on information he obtained from Steele .
Steele met with several reporters in September 2016 as part of an effort to disseminate his information about Trump .
Though there is no evidence to support Steele @ @ @ @ @ @ @ asserted that the former Trump aide did meet with Sechin and Diveykin .
“ We learned that when Carter Page traveled to Moscow in July 2016 , he met with close Putin ally and Chairman of the Russian state oil company , Igor Sechin , ” he wrote .
“ Renowned investigative journalist Michael Isikoff reported in September 2016 that U.S. intelligence sources confirmed that Page met with both Sechin and Divyekin during his July trip to Russia .
What ’ s more , the Justice Department obtained a wiretap in summer 2016 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there was sufficient evidence to show Page was operating as a Russian asset , ” the piece continued .
Sipher ’ s updated story notes that Isikoff ’ s report “ may have relied on Steele himself.
” But he added that “ U.S .
intelligence officials were confident enough in the information received about Page ’ s meeting Russian officials to brief senior members of Congress on it.
” Sipher ’ s analysis that the dossier was bolstered by the Justice Department obtaining authorization to surveil Page is also undercut by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ report , the Justice Department conceded that two of the four surveillance warrants are “ not valid.
” ( RELATED : DOJ Says Two Carter Page FISAs Are ‘ Not Valid ’ ) Orbis also cited a Dec. 14 , 2018 report that Chuck Rosenberg , a former top aide to Jim Comey , wrote at Lawfare .
“ The dossier holds up well over time , and none of it , to our knowledge , has been disproven , ” Rosenberg wrote .
One of Steele ’ s most intriguing claims about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ after Rosenberg ’ s article came out .
In the dossier , Steele alleged that in August 2016 , then-Trump lawyer Michael Cohen visited Prague to meet with Kremlin insiders to discuss paying off hackers .
Cohen vehemently denied Steele ’ s claims during congressional testimony in 2019 , after he began cooperating with the special counsel ’ s investigation .
The special counsel ’ s report also indicated that Cohen did not go to Prague .
Rosenberg has acknowledged in the wake of the damning IG report that he would have written @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is out there now , I think we would have written our article a bit differently .
We did the best we could with what we had at the time , he told The Washington Post on Dec. 27 , 2019 .
“ The IG report adds important information about the provenance of the dossier ( and some of that certainly calls Steele ’ s methodology and his raw intelligence into question ) , ” he added .
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ audience .
For licensing opportunities of our original content , please contact licensing @ dailycallernewsfoundation.org .

Christopher Steele’s intelligence firm responded to President Trump’s comments on Thursday about the “fake dossier.”
Orbis Business Intelligence, Steele’s London-based company, said that Trump made “false claims” about the dossier.
The dossier was all but debunked by the special counsel’s report and DOJ inspector general’s report.
The inspector general blasted the FBI for its handling of information from Steele, who investigated Trump on behalf of the Clinton campaign and DNC.
Christopher Steele’s private intelligence firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, accused President Trump of making “false claims” during a White House speech Thursday about the former British spy’s infamous dossier, which has come under intense scrutiny following a Justice Department inspector general (IG) report.
“Yesterday @realDonaldTrump made false claims about us,” reads a tweet from Orbis’s Twitter account posted Friday.
“He wildly exaggerated our fees and, contrary to his claims we have never stated any of our reporting is ‘fake’. We stand by the integrity of our research on Kremlin interference in the 2016 election and support for Trump,” the tweet continued.
Yesterday @realDonaldTrump made false claims about us. He wildly exaggerated our fees and, contrary to his claims we have never stated any of our reporting is “fake”. We stand by the integrity of our research on Kremlin interference in the 2016 election and support for Trump. 1/3 — Orbis Business Intelligence (@OrbisBIOfficial) February 7, 2020
Trump blasted the dossier as “fake” during a White House speech on Thursday.
“So we had a campaign, little did we know we were running against some very, very bad and evil people with fake dossiers with all of these horrible, dirty cops that took these dossiers and did bad things,” Trump said. (RELATED: Trump Blasts ‘Fake Dossiers’ And FISA Court)
Steele, a former MI6 officer, investigated Trump and members of his campaign in 2016 on behalf of the Clinton campaign and DNC. He provided some of his information to the FBI, which used parts of the dossier to obtain surveillance warrants against Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.
In the dossier, Steele alleged that Page was a key player in a “well-developed conspiracy of cooperation” between the Trump campaign and Russian government. He also claimed that the Kremlin had cultivated Trump for years, and that the campaign was involved in and aware of the hack of Democrats’ emails released through WikiLeaks.
Steele’s Trump-related claims were all but debunked by the special counsel’s report and the Justice Department inspector general’s report on the FBI’s surveillance of Page.
The special counsel found no evidence of a Trump-Russia conspiracy, or that anyone on the Trump campaign was a Russian agent. The report also said that nobody on the campaign was involved in the theft of Democrats’ emails.
The IG report further undercut Steele’s reporting.
It said that Steele’s primary source of information told the FBI in January 2017 that information in the dossier was inaccurate or embellished. Steele himself told his FBI contacts on Oct. 3, 2016 that a sub-source for several key claims in the dossier was a “boaster” and “embellisher.”
The IG report blasted the FBI for relying on Steele’s information, and for failing to disclose its flaws to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which authorized four surveillance orders against Page.
The report also said that some of Steele’s associates told FBI agents in November and December 2016 that the retired spook had shown poor judgement in the past.
In response to Trump, Orbis cited analysis from a former CIA officer and a former FBI official who have been highly critical of the president.
“For a detailed, balanced assessment of our 2016 work take a look at this from former CIA officer and Russia expert John Sipher,” Orbis said, pointing to a Sept. 6, 2017 report that Sipher published at Just Security.
For a detailed, balanced assessment of our 2016 work take a look at this from former CIA officer and Russia expert John Sipher:https://t.co/ki8VaVfiK0 2/3 — Orbis Business Intelligence (@OrbisBIOfficial) February 7, 2020
In an early version of the article, Sipher falsely claimed that a Sept. 23, 2016 news article at Yahoo! News provided independent verification of Steele’s work. The Yahoo! piece, written by Michael Isikoff, said that U.S. law enforcement officials were investigating whether Carter Page met with Kremlin insiders Igor Sechin and Igor Diveykin during a trip to Moscow in July 2016.
Sipher, a former CIA officer, asserted that the article bolstered the dossier’s credibility. But Sipher corrected the article after The Daily Caller notified Just Security that Isikoff’s article was based on information he obtained from Steele.
Steele met with several reporters in September 2016 as part of an effort to disseminate his information about Trump.
Though there is no evidence to support Steele’s claims about Page, Sipher asserted that the former Trump aide did meet with Sechin and Diveykin.
“We learned that when Carter Page traveled to Moscow in July 2016, he met with close Putin ally and Chairman of the Russian state oil company, Igor Sechin,” he wrote.
“Renowned investigative journalist Michael Isikoff reported in September 2016 that U.S. intelligence sources confirmed that Page met with both Sechin and Divyekin during his July trip to Russia. What’s more, the Justice Department obtained a wiretap in summer 2016 on Page after satisfying a court that there was sufficient evidence to show Page was operating as a Russian asset,” the piece continued.
Sipher’s updated story notes that Isikoff’s report “may have relied on Steele himself.” But he added that “U.S. intelligence officials were confident enough in the information received about Page’s meeting Russian officials to brief senior members of Congress on it.”
Sipher’s analysis that the dossier was bolstered by the Justice Department obtaining authorization to surveil Page is also undercut by the IG report. In response to the report, the Justice Department conceded that two of the four surveillance warrants are “not valid.” (RELATED: DOJ Says Two Carter Page FISAs Are ‘Not Valid’)
Orbis also cited a Dec. 14, 2018 report that Chuck Rosenberg, a former top aide to Jim Comey, wrote at Lawfare.
“The dossier holds up well over time, and none of it, to our knowledge, has been disproven,” Rosenberg wrote.
One of Steele’s most intriguing claims about Trump-Russia collusion was all but debunked shortly after Rosenberg’s article came out.
In the dossier, Steele alleged that in August 2016, then-Trump lawyer Michael Cohen visited Prague to meet with Kremlin insiders to discuss paying off hackers. Cohen vehemently denied Steele’s claims during congressional testimony in 2019, after he began cooperating with the special counsel’s investigation. The special counsel’s report also indicated that Cohen did not go to Prague.
Rosenberg has acknowledged in the wake of the damning IG report that he would have written his analysis differently.
“With what is out there now, I think we would have written our article a bit differently. We did the best we could with what we had at the time, he told The Washington Post on Dec. 27, 2019.
“The IG report adds important information about the provenance of the dossier (and some of that certainly calls Steele’s methodology and his raw intelligence into question),” he added.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.


thelibertydaily--2020-02-07--LOL! Rashida Tlaib Sat Next to Ilhan Omar for Help With ‘Triggering’ Events During Trump State of th

LOL! Rashida Tlaib Sat Next to Ilhan Omar for Help With ‘Triggering’ Events During Trump State of the Union

Rashida Tlaib admitted that she ’ s such a snowflake she needed an emotional support crutch in the form of @ @ @ @ @ of the Union speech .
Wow .
How does she not know that this will @ @ @ @ @ us who laugh at triggered snowflakes on the left ?
And really , Trump didn @ @ @ @ @ State of the Union much to press the Democrats on anything .
He didn ’ @ @ @ @ @ !
!
But as we all know , liberals are triggered by even the simplest @ @ @ @ @ reason , and logic .
Pathetic .
NOW , on the other hand , some @ @ @ @ @ out of proportion : That ’ s just pretty typical political action speech .
I @ @ @ @ @ past her to put her foot in her mouth , because she seems to have @ @ @ @ @ but this ain ’ t one of those times…

Rashida Tlaib admitted that she’s such a snowflake she needed an emotional support crutch in the form of Ilhan Omar during the State of the Union speech.
Wow. How does she not know that this will be used by those of us who laugh at triggered snowflakes on the left?
And really, Trump didn’t even use the State of the Union much to press the Democrats on anything. He didn’t even mention impeachment once!! But as we all know, liberals are triggered by even the simplest examples of common sense, reason, and logic. Pathetic.
NOW, on the other hand, some people are blowing this quote out of proportion:
That’s just pretty typical political action speech. I wouldn’t put it past her to put her foot in her mouth, because she seems to have a penchant for that, but this ain’t one of those times…


thelibertydaily--2020-02-07--President Trump Says Speaker Pelosi ‘Broke The Law’ By Ripping Up SOTU Speech

President Trump came out and stated that he believes that what House Speaker Nancy Pelosi did during the State of the Union address — ripping up his speech — was illegal , and the thing is , he might actually be correct .
Pelosi , 79 , became the talk of the town Tuesday evening when she made a complete spectacle of herself by first not announcing the president properly and then by ripping up his speech at the end of the address .
Here ’ s more on this from The Washington Examiner : Trending : Watch : Nancy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ During State of the Union Speech “ I thought it was a terrible thing when she ripped up the speech , ” Trump , 73 , told reporters on Friday .
“ First of all , it ’ s an official document .
You ’ re not allowed .
It ’ s illegal what she did .
She broke the law , but I haven ’ t been asked a question other than a lot of people that viewed it , they couldn ’ t believe that she did it .
I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chamber , to the country.
” take our poll - story continues below Should the Senate Give Full Acquittal to President Trump • None Should the US Senate Give President Trump a Full Acquittal ?
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge .
You may opt out at anytime .
You also agree to this site 's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use .
Trump added , “ I got very high marks on the speech .
I didn ’ t know she did it until @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the congressmen and women were saying , ‘ Can you believe what she did ?
’ But I didn ’ t know she did it.
” A number of Trump ’ s Republican allies in Congress HAVE pledged to take action against Pelosi after the ripped up her paper copy of the speech .
The Democrat-led House voted down a Republican resolution condemning Pelosi for the stunt .
What Pelosi did was clearly a stunt aimed at making her look hard edged while also adding a little balm to the wounds of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be disappointed with the results of the impeachment vote the following day .
The stunt was clearly pre-planned , as video of the event shows her pre-ripping pages to make sure she could actually do it when it came time to tear it up .
Seeing as how Pelosi ’ s actions represent the House , this is a major violation of decorum and she deserves to be held accountable for it .

President Trump came out and stated that he believes that what House Speaker Nancy Pelosi did during the State of the Union address — ripping up his speech — was illegal, and the thing is, he might actually be correct.
Pelosi, 79, became the talk of the town Tuesday evening when she made a complete spectacle of herself by first not announcing the president properly and then by ripping up his speech at the end of the address.
Here’s more on this from The Washington Examiner:
“I thought it was a terrible thing when she ripped up the speech,” Trump, 73, told reporters on Friday. “First of all, it’s an official document. You’re not allowed. It’s illegal what she did. She broke the law, but I haven’t been asked a question other than a lot of people that viewed it, they couldn’t believe that she did it. I thought it was very disrespectful to the chamber, to the country.” Trump added, “I got very high marks on the speech. I didn’t know she did it until she was walking out and some of the congressmen and women were saying, ‘Can you believe what she did?’ But I didn’t know she did it.” Trending: Massive Migrant Caravan Marches Toward US with LGBT Flags Flying as Mexican President Snubs Biden at Summit A number of Trump’s Republican allies in Congress HAVE pledged to take action against Pelosi after the ripped up her paper copy of the speech. The Democrat-led House voted down a Republican resolution condemning Pelosi for the stunt.
What Pelosi did was clearly a stunt aimed at making her look hard edged while also adding a little balm to the wounds of the left who she probably knew were going to be disappointed with the results of the impeachment vote the following day.
The stunt was clearly pre-planned, as video of the event shows her pre-ripping pages to make sure she could actually do it when it came time to tear it up.
Seeing as how Pelosi’s actions represent the House, this is a major violation of decorum and she deserves to be held accountable for it.
Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success!


thelibertydaily--2020-02-09--U.S. Buying $700,000 Worth of Condoms for African Nation Where the King is Worth $200 Million

Yet The Eswatini King Has an Estimated Net Worth of $ 200 Million The Kingdom of Eswatini had been known as Swaziland until Ngwenyama Mswati III Dlamini , their oppressive King Mswati III , changed the name .
It is this country the US just released a Grants Notice allocating $ 700,000 to assist with supply and distribution of condoms .
In 2018 , King Mswati renamed the nation eSwatini , which means “ land of the Swazis ” partly to celebrate his 50th birthday , the nation ’ s 50 year anniversary of freedom from colonial rule , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ former name and Switzerland .
According to a BBC article , at the time of the renaming , Mswati had been referring to his nation as eSwatini for years .
A revision was made at some point after the renaming to change the capitalization of the e and s to Eswatini .
Swazi ’ s Live in Desperation ; Their Monarch in Opulent Luxury While the name change likely served as a feel good moment for Swazis , Eswatini has dire issues starting with the fact it is the last absolute monarchy in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Swazi ’ s extreme poverty , low life expectancy , and one of the world ’ s highest HIV rates .
Poverty level is defined as a population who survives on $ 1.90 a day or less .
The World Food Programme estimates “ 63 percent of people live below the national poverty line , ” which puts Eswatini 12th worst in the world .
For reference , Syria has the world ’ s worst poverty levels as 82.5 % of their population lives below the poverty limit .
The life expectancy in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2005 when The World Bank calculated it at 42.518 years .
Their most recent data from 2017 shows a life expectancy at 58.319 years .
To understand this on a global scale , the world rate for 2017 is 72.838 years .
In terms of HIV incidence rates , The World Bank lists the 2018 world rate at 0.8 % .
Their 2018 data identifies 27.3 % of the Eswatini population between 15-49 had been infected .
This rate is down from a high of 28.2 % in 2014 .
The Joint United @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reported in 2018 , 210,000 Swazis were living with HIV .
These devastating numbers show an absolute need for a variety of worldwide assistance .
This includes condoms , which will assist with the continued drop of HIV rate and should contribute to higher life expectancy rates .
Not only will the correct use of condoms during sex reduce HIV rates , but other sexually transmitted diseases also , both of which contributes to early death rates .
Does Eswatini really need the world ’ s help ?
While his people live in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ absolute opulence .
In 2014 , The Guardian reported the King increased his household ’ s annual budget to $ 61 million dollars .
At $ 167,123 , his daily income is light years more than the $ 1.90 his people have .
Alexis Carey wrote a 2019 article in which she detailed the King ’ s wealth and spending .
Carey reported Mswati “ splurged on up to 19 Rolls-Royces and dozens of BMWs , which were pictured being delivered from South Africa to the king ’ s opulent palace.
” He @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worth $ 13.2 million .
Yet 63 % of his people live on $ 1.90 or less every single day .
The Kingdom of Eswatini Ministry of Health ( MOH ) attributes their country ’ s HIV rate , one of the world ’ s largest to high risk behaviors such as “ men who have sex with men , sex workers , their clients , and their partners.
” The United States Agency for International Development ( USAID ) and MOH recognize not enough condoms are available for those who can ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , condom deliveries are a target for thieves .
A solution to thwart these criminals while providing the increasing supply of condoms is a $ 700,000 US grant for additional condoms and to consolidate the nation ’ s condom supply .
A Judicial Watch report found the US government already “ pays for 90 % of the condoms through the President ’ s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief ( PEPFAR ) .
” The Counter to the Condom Conundrum The condoms are delivered and distributed by the Eswatini National Condom Programm led by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( MOH ) under the Sexual and Reproductive Health Unit ( SRHU ) .
In the MOH ’ s “ The National Condom Strategy 2018-2022 ” report , they recognize distribution of and training in the use of condoms are amongst the highest priorities to lower rates of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases ( STD ) along with pregnancy .
One of the plans outlined in the MOH condom strategy report is to ensure supplies of condoms can be found “ throughout the community ” and in high traffic locations where condoms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as hotels and bars .
It also raises a concern current supplies of condoms can be readily acquired in cities , but rural communities often run out of their supply of condoms .
A solution to this issue is the advent of “ Community-based distribution agents ( CBDAs ) .
” Another source to distribute condoms according to the report will be “ peer educators and outreach workers ” since these people will be familiar with locals who might not trust a governmental group .
The MOH ’ s “ The National Condom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ detailed financial breakdown for implementation , which it lists at $ 1,043,000 for full implementation .
The first section , Leadership , Coordination and Partnerships , accounts for $ 268,000 .
Supply and Commodity Security has an estimated cost of $ 81,000 .
Another $ 561,000 is designated for Demand , Access and Utilization .
A total of $ 133,000 is earmarked for Programme Support .
This does not include any funds for additional condoms , which is where the $ 700,000 new US grant comes into play .
What does this all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government through USAID is taking more control of our taxpayer funds going around the world .
It is the healthy scepticism within me that will cause me to track which companies win the contract to see if any politicians are connected for possible paybacks .
I will also be looking at any contributions coming to current and/or newly elected politicians from King Mswati for the same .

Yet The Eswatini King Has an Estimated Net Worth of $200 Million
Get Your Patriot911 Newsletter In Your Email Inbox SIGN UP!
The Kingdom of Eswatini had been known as Swaziland until Ngwenyama Mswati III Dlamini, their oppressive King Mswati III, changed the name. It is this country the US just released a Grants Notice allocating $700,000 to assist with supply and distribution of condoms.
In 2018, King Mswati renamed the nation eSwatini, which means “land of the Swazis” partly to celebrate his 50th birthday, the nation’s 50 year anniversary of freedom from colonial rule, and to help end the confusion between the former name and Switzerland. According to a BBC article, at the time of the renaming, Mswati had been referring to his nation as eSwatini for years. A revision was made at some point after the renaming to change the capitalization of the e and s to Eswatini.
Swazi’s Live in Desperation; Their Monarch in Opulent Luxury
While the name change likely served as a feel good moment for Swazis, Eswatini has dire issues starting with the fact it is the last absolute monarchy in Africa. This has contributed to the Swazi’s extreme poverty, low life expectancy, and one of the world’s highest HIV rates. Poverty level is defined as a population who survives on $1.90 a day or less. The World Food Programme estimates “63 percent of people live below the national poverty line,” which puts Eswatini 12th worst in the world. For reference, Syria has the world’s worst poverty levels as 82.5% of their population lives below the poverty limit.
In 2018, 210,000 Swazis were living with HIV. UNAIDS
The life expectancy in Eswatini has been on the rise since 2005 when The World Bank calculated it at 42.518 years. Their most recent data from 2017 shows a life expectancy at 58.319 years. To understand this on a global scale, the world rate for 2017 is 72.838 years. In terms of HIV incidence rates, The World Bank lists the 2018 world rate at 0.8%. Their 2018 data identifies 27.3% of the Eswatini population between 15-49 had been infected. This rate is down from a high of 28.2% in 2014. The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) reported in 2018, 210,000 Swazis were living with HIV.
These devastating numbers show an absolute need for a variety of worldwide assistance. This includes condoms, which will assist with the continued drop of HIV rate and should contribute to higher life expectancy rates. Not only will the correct use of condoms during sex reduce HIV rates, but other sexually transmitted diseases also, both of which contributes to early death rates.
Does Eswatini really need the world’s help?
While his people live in desperation, King Mswati III lives in absolute opulence. In 2014, The Guardian reported the King increased his household’s annual budget to $61 million dollars. At $167,123, his daily income is light years more than the $1.90 his people have. Alexis Carey wrote a 2019 article in which she detailed the King’s wealth and spending. Carey reported Mswati “splurged on up to 19 Rolls-Royces and dozens of BMWs, which were pictured being delivered from South Africa to the king’s opulent palace.” He also owns two private jets, one worth $13.2 million. Yet 63% of his people live on $1.90 or less every single day.
The Kingdom of Eswatini Ministry of Health (MOH) attributes their country’s HIV rate, one of the world’s largest to high risk behaviors such as “men who have sex with men, sex workers, their clients, and their partners.” The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and MOH recognize not enough condoms are available for those who can’t afford them. A valuable commodity, condom deliveries are a target for thieves. A solution to thwart these criminals while providing the increasing supply of condoms is a $700,000 US grant for additional condoms and to consolidate the nation’s condom supply. A Judicial Watch report found the US government already “pays for 90% of the condoms through the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR).”
The Counter to the Condom Conundrum
The condoms are delivered and distributed by the Eswatini National Condom Programm led by the Kingdom of Eswatini Ministry of Health (MOH) under the Sexual and Reproductive Health Unit (SRHU). In the MOH’s “The National Condom Strategy 2018-2022” report, they recognize distribution of and training in the use of condoms are amongst the highest priorities to lower rates of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases (STD) along with pregnancy.
Is Biden the ultimate embarrassment to our country? Yes! He's not that bad Email* This poll gives you free access to your Patriot911 Newsletter in your email inbox. Email field is required. Unsubscribe at any time. Submit your vote!
One of the plans outlined in the MOH condom strategy report is to ensure supplies of condoms can be found “throughout the community” and in high traffic locations where condoms could be a sought out commodity such as hotels and bars. It also raises a concern current supplies of condoms can be readily acquired in cities, but rural communities often run out of their supply of condoms. A solution to this issue is the advent of “Community-based distribution agents (CBDAs).” Another source to distribute condoms according to the report will be “peer educators and outreach workers” since these people will be familiar with locals who might not trust a governmental group.
The Detailed Monetary Needs
The MOH’s “The National Condom Strategy 2018-2022” report has a very detailed financial breakdown for implementation, which it lists at $1,043,000 for full implementation. The first section, Leadership, Coordination and Partnerships, accounts for $268,000. Supply and Commodity Security has an estimated cost of $81,000. Another $561,000 is designated for Demand, Access and Utilization. A total of $133,000 is earmarked for Programme Support. This does not include any funds for additional condoms, which is where the $700,000 new US grant comes into play.
What does this all mean? Possibly just that the US government through USAID is taking more control of our taxpayer funds going around the world. It is the healthy scepticism within me that will cause me to track which companies win the contract to see if any politicians are connected for possible paybacks. I will also be looking at any contributions coming to current and/or newly elected politicians from King Mswati for the same.


thelibertydaily--2020-02-09--Second in Two Days: Another NYPD Officer Shot by a Cop-Hater in Democrat New York

The Bronx lieutenant who was shot in the arm by a brazen cop-hating gunman has been identified as Jose Gautreaux , according to police sources .
The lieutenant was shot just before 8 a.m. when a gunman walked into the 41st Precinct house in Hunts Point on Sunday .
He was taken to Lincoln Hospital where he was expected to be OK .
The 15-year veteran ’ s gunshot wounds “ narrowly missed ” any vital structures and he is expected to make a full recovery , NYPD officials said .
Cops swarmed the gunman — who could be seen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ desk in a dramatic series of videos from the lobby of the station house — and was taken into custody .
Police sources identified the man as Robert Williams , who has had multiple run-ins with the law , including a homicide accusation .
The shooter was believed to be the same man who ambushed another 41st Precinct cop while he sat in a marked police van in the Bronx Saturday night — less than 12 hours earlier .
Gautreaux was promoted to lieutenant in June 2018 after being a sergeant for seven @ @

The Bronx lieutenant who was shot in the arm by a brazen cop-hating gunman has been identified as Jose Gautreaux, according to police sources.
The lieutenant was shot just before 8 a.m. when a gunman walked into the 41st Precinct house in Hunts Point on Sunday. He was taken to Lincoln Hospital where he was expected to be OK.
The 15-year veteran’s gunshot wounds “narrowly missed” any vital structures and he is expected to make a full recovery, NYPD officials said.
Cops swarmed the gunman — who could be seen surrendering to police after diving behind a desk in a dramatic series of videos from the lobby of the station house — and was taken into custody.
Police sources identified the man as Robert Williams, who has had multiple run-ins with the law, including a homicide accusation.
The shooter was believed to be the same man who ambushed another 41st Precinct cop while he sat in a marked police van in the Bronx Saturday night — less than 12 hours earlier.
Gautreaux was promoted to lieutenant in June 2018 after being a sergeant for seven years.


thelibertydaily--2020-02-09--‘Stop This Now’ President Trump Demands NYC Protect Police Offers From Weekend Attempted Assassinati

‘Stop This Now’ President Trump Demands NYC Protect Police Offers From Weekend Attempted Assassinations

President Trump called on local law enforcement in New York City and statewide politicians to do more to defend their @ @ @ @ @ shootings that injured officers over the weekend .
`` I grew up in New York @ @ @ @ @ years , got to watch how GREAT NYC ’ s 'Finest ' are , '' @ @ @ @ @ Sunday .
`` Now , because of weak leadership at Governor & Mayor , stand @ @ @ @ @ them ) regulations , and lack of support , our wonderful NYC police are under @ @ @ @ @ ! ''
Police said a man walked into the NYPD 's 41st precinct early Sunday @ @ @ @ @ officers there , injuring one .
Authorities believe the suspect could be responsible for or @ @ @ @ @ Saturday night , in which two other officers were attacked in their patrol vehicle in @ @ @ @ @ night attack was described as `` an attempted assassination . ''

President Trump called on local law enforcement in New York City and statewide politicians to do more to defend their police officers following two back-to-back shootings that injured officers over the weekend.
"I grew up in New York City and, over many years, got to watch how GREAT NYC’s 'Finest' are," Trump said in a tweet Sunday. "Now, because of weak leadership at Governor & Mayor, stand away (water thrown at them) regulations, and lack of support, our wonderful NYC police are under assault. Stop this now!"
I grew up in New York City and, over many years, got to watch how GREAT NYC’s “Finest” are. Now, because of weak leadership at Governor & Mayor, stand away (water thrown at them) regulations, and lack of support, our wonderful NYC police are under assault. Stop this now! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 9, 2020
Police said a man walked into the NYPD's 41st precinct early Sunday morning and opened fire on officers there, injuring one. Authorities believe the suspect could be responsible for or connected to a separate incident Saturday night, in which two other officers were attacked in their patrol vehicle in the Bronx.
The Saturday night attack was described as "an attempted assassination."


thelibertydaily--2020-02-10--Milwaukee Gas Station is Trying to Keep Its Business Licence After Porn Video was Recorded in Snack

Milwaukee Gas Station is Trying to Keep Its Business Licence After Porn Video was Recorded in Snack Aisle

MILWAUKEE -- A Milwaukee gas station is fighting to keep its business license after an amateur porn star recorded a sex video in the snack aisle .
A FOX6 investigation finds the man who shot - and participated in - the video makes money by making sex videos in public places all over the Milwaukee area .
For decades , there 's been a gas station at the corner of 35th Street and Townsend in Milwaukee 's Roosevelt Grove neighborhood .
If Milwaukee alderman Khalif Rainey gets his way , it wo n't be there for long .
`` Under @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it , '' the District 7 Alderman told FOX6 Investigator Bryan Polcyn .
In July 2018 , a convicted felon turned the gas station into a porn set while the business was open .
`` He had nothin ' on but a bathrobe ! ''
said Clifton Daly , who lives behind the store .
The video shows Frederick Allen , an aspiring rapper and amateur porn model , having sex in the center aisle .
`` Keep in mind , it was right next to the chips , and across from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ during testimony before the Milwaukee Common Council 's licenses committee in July 2019 .
Allen is known among his online fans for explicit acts in public places , from shopping malls to movie theaters , public streets even public parks - including Milwaukee 's Swing Park .
He 's made sex videos in fast-food parking lots , inside hospital rooms , on top of car hoods and city rooftops .
`` This is something they do all across the city , '' Rainey said .
`` It 's like a business ! ''
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ with him outside his house a few blocks from the gas station .
From the looks of Allen 's Instagram account , business is booming .
His exploits have gotten him in trouble before .
In 2017 , police identified a 15-year-old girl in one of his videos .
Through an open records request , the FOX6 Investigators obtained a copy of a police interview with Allen from that case .
`` So what is my charge ? ''
Allen asked the detective .
`` Second-degree sexual assault of a child , '' @ @ @ @ @ @ @ slump back into the metal chair .
The charges were later dropped when a witness backed out .
Meanwhile , Allen 's sex video enterprise appears to be going strong .
He has more than 67-thousand subscribers to his 'channel ' on the adult website PornHub .
His videos on that site alone have more than 100 million views .
`` It 's a disgusting act , '' said Emil Ovbiagele , attorney for Kool Petroleum , the company that owns the 35th Hometown gas station .
`` I 'm not going to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ station video is especially controversial because of what it showed in the background .
`` It was the owner , '' Rainey said .
`` He was there .
He was watching .
He indulged .
He did n't pick up the phone .
He did n't call the police department . ''
As Allen engages in an explicit sex act on the floor of the convenience store , Kulwant Dhillon - the gas station owner - can be seen standing behind the glass , watching .
One of his employees is also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a cell phone .
`` The bad choice to allow staff to tape it , '' said Milele Coggs , District 6 Alderwoman .
`` That , to me , is just as bad as not calling the police . ''
City officials might never have known about the video but for one thing .
Allen uploaded it to Pornhub with `` 35th and Townsend '' in the video clip 's title .
`` It was actually a constituent who saw it online and brought it to my attention , '' Rainey said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the gas station 's license to be revoked .
`` We ca n't allow these things to go on in our community , '' he said .
Last summer , Dhillon told the licenses committee that not calling police was `` a mistake , '' but says he was afraid to call because Allen had threatened him .
`` He said , 'If you 're going to call the police , I will shoot you and burn your gas station , too , ' '' Dhillon recounted to the committee .
Allen denies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it .
`` He was protected by bulletproof glass .
So the idea that he was in fear , I take exception to that , '' Rainey said .
Either way , Dhillon 's lawyer says he tried to make good by helping prosecutors in an unrelated case .
In August 2018 , Allen assaulted a teenage boy after a traffic accident near 35th and Fond du Lac , just blocks from the gas station .
After the beating , Allen followed the boy into a corner store .
It just so happens @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
And he told police what he saw .
`` And in that case , you were state 's star witness , correct ? ''
Ovbiagele asked Dhillon during testimony .
`` Correct , '' Dhillon said .
At the station 's license renewal hearing last July , supporters came to the owner 's defense : The committee voted to suspend the gas station for 20 days , but when other neighbors got wind of it they signed a petition .
`` Once I saw that tape , we want it closed , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the street behind the store .
`` What if your daughter had walked in ? ''
asked Martin Childs , pastor of nearby Pilgrim Rest Missionary Baptist Church .
`` What if your sister had walked in ?
What if your mother had walked in ? ''
After receiving the petition , Rainey called for a new hearing .
`` Our community has to expect more , '' Claudia Reid said at that hearing in September 2019 .
`` We need to start having respect for ourselves , '' Paulette Bangora said .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ our community being a garbage dump , '' Childs said .
This time , the committee voted not to renew the gas station 's license at all .
So Kool Petroleum sued the city .
A Milwaukee County Judge issued a temporary injunction allowing the gas station to remain open while the case makes its way through court .
That case is still pending .
`` To see this gas station still open and in operation , it 's disturbing , '' Rainey said .
To Frederick Allen , it 's much ado @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worse videos than that , '' he said .
`` I 'm cold with a camera . ''
This is not the first time he 's pushed the limits of decency .
`` I got threesomes at the police station on top of a cop car .
I got some wild stuff , '' Allen said .
And it 's unlikely to be the last .
Allen lives two blocks east of Milwaukee Police District 7 where he claims to have recorded a sex video on top of a squad car , though @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that .
As for the gas station , Allen says this is n't even the first pornographic video he recorded there .
And he 's telling the truth .
In March of 2015 , Allen uploaded a sex video to a website called World Star .
It 's cell phone video of Allen having intercourse with a woman up against the beverage coolers at the back of the 35th Hometown gas station .
That video has more than 2-and-a-half million hits .
While Allen is known for producing these explicit videos in public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of any other businesses that have had license actions taken against them .
We are also unaware of any other videos that show a business owner or employee watching the act take place .
As it stands , the 35th Hometown gas station will remain in operation while its parent company , Kool Petroleum sues the city over its business license .
The next hearing is set for April 2 , 2020 , in Milwaukee County Circuit Court .

MILWAUKEE -- A Milwaukee gas station is fighting to keep its business license after an amateur porn star recorded a sex video in the snack aisle. A FOX6 investigation finds the man who shot - and participated in - the video makes money by making sex videos in public places all over the Milwaukee area.
For decades, there's been a gas station at the corner of 35th Street and Townsend in Milwaukee's Roosevelt Grove neighborhood. If Milwaukee alderman Khalif Rainey gets his way, it won't be there for long.
"Under my watch, I won't allow it," the District 7 Alderman told FOX6 Investigator Bryan Polcyn.
In July 2018, a convicted felon turned the gas station into a porn set while the business was open.
"He had nothin' on but a bathrobe!" said Clifton Daly, who lives behind the store.
The video shows Frederick Allen, an aspiring rapper and amateur porn model, having sex in the center aisle.
"Keep in mind, it was right next to the chips, and across from the sunflower seeds," Alderman Rainey said during testimony before the Milwaukee Common Council's licenses committee in July 2019.
Allen is known among his online fans for explicit acts in public places, from shopping malls to movie theaters, public streets even public parks - including Milwaukee's Swing Park. He's made sex videos in fast-food parking lots, inside hospital rooms, on top of car hoods and city rooftops.
"This is something they do all across the city," Rainey said.
"It's like a business!" Frederick Allen said when FOX6 caught up with him outside his house a few blocks from the gas station.
From the looks of Allen's Instagram account, business is booming.
"I get paid every month, like ten thousand." Allen said.
"Ten thousand a month?" FOX6 Investigator Bryan Polcyn asked.
"Ten thousand what?" a FOX6 photographer asked from behind the camera.
"Ten thousand dollars," Allen said.
"A month?" Polcyn asked.
"Mm-hmm," Allen replied.
His exploits have gotten him in trouble before.
In 2017, police identified a 15-year-old girl in one of his videos. Through an open records request, the FOX6 Investigators obtained a copy of a police interview with Allen from that case.
"So what is my charge?" Allen asked the detective.
"Second-degree sexual assault of a child," the detective replied, prompting Allen to slump back into the metal chair.
Allen slumps in his chair after an MPD detective informs him he's recommending a charge of 2nd degree sexual assault of a child in 2017. The charge was later dropped.
The charges were later dropped when a witness backed out. Meanwhile, Allen's sex video enterprise appears to be going strong. He has more than 67-thousand subscribers to his 'channel' on the adult website PornHub. His videos on that site alone have more than 100 million views.
"It's a disgusting act," said Emil Ovbiagele, attorney for Kool Petroleum, the company that owns the 35th Hometown gas station. "I'm not going to sanitize this."
Allen's gas station video is especially controversial because of what it showed in the background.
The video shows gas station owner Kulwant Dhillon watching the sex act from behind the glass. Dhillon says he was afraid to call police because Allen had threatened him, a claim Allen denies.
"It was the owner," Rainey said. "He was there. He was watching. He indulged. He didn't pick up the phone. He didn't call the police department."
As Allen engages in an explicit sex act on the floor of the convenience store, Kulwant Dhillon - the gas station owner - can be seen standing behind the glass, watching. One of his employees is also there, recording the sex act with a cell phone.
"The bad choice to allow staff to tape it," said Milele Coggs, District 6 Alderwoman. "That, to me, is just as bad as not calling the police."
City officials might never have known about the video but for one thing. Allen uploaded it to Pornhub with "35th and Townsend" in the video clip's title.
"It was actually a constituent who saw it online and brought it to my attention," Rainey said.
That prompted Rainey to call for the gas station's license to be revoked.
"We can't allow these things to go on in our community," he said.
Last summer, Dhillon told the licenses committee that not calling police was "a mistake," but says he was afraid to call because Allen had threatened him.
In the summer of 2019, District 7 Alderman Khalif Rainey called for the gas station's license to be revoked.
"He said, 'If you're going to call the police, I will shoot you and burn your gas station, too,'" Dhillon recounted to the committee.
Allen denies that. And Rainey didn't buy it.
"He was protected by bulletproof glass. So the idea that he was in fear, I take exception to that," Rainey said.
Either way, Dhillon's lawyer says he tried to make good by helping prosecutors in an unrelated case. In August 2018, Allen assaulted a teenage boy after a traffic accident near 35th and Fond du Lac, just blocks from the gas station. After the beating, Allen followed the boy into a corner store.
It just so happens, Dhillon owned that store, too. And he told police what he saw.
"And in that case, you were state's star witness, correct?" Ovbiagele asked Dhillon during testimony.
"Correct," Dhillon said.
At the station's license renewal hearing last July, supporters came to the owner's defense:
"He's the kindest guy, he'll give you anything," one supporter said.
"The guy breaks his back for us in the community," another said.
"He had no control over it,"said Tamika Scott."
"This guy's being destroyed for what somebody else did," said a man who identified himself only as Mr. McCall.
The committee voted to suspend the gas station for 20 days, but when other neighbors got wind of it they signed a petition.
"Once I saw that tape, we want it closed," said John Reid who lives on the street behind the store.
Allen's Instagram account is peppered with photos of the amateur porn star and aspiring rap artist displaying gaudy stacks of cash. He claims the porn videos earn him more than $10,000 per month.
"What if your daughter had walked in?" asked Martin Childs, pastor of nearby Pilgrim Rest Missionary Baptist Church. "What if your sister had walked in? What if your mother had walked in?"
After receiving the petition, Rainey called for a new hearing.
"Our community has to expect more," Claudia Reid said at that hearing in September 2019.
"We need to start having respect for ourselves," Paulette Bangora said.
"I'm sick and tired of our community being a garbage dump," Childs said.
This time, the committee voted not to renew the gas station's license at all. So Kool Petroleum sued the city. A Milwaukee County Judge issued a temporary injunction allowing the gas station to remain open while the case makes its way through court. That case is still pending.
"To see this gas station still open and in operation, it's disturbing," Rainey said.
To Frederick Allen, it's much ado about nothing.
"I got way worse videos than that," he said. "I'm cold with a camera."
This is not the first time he's pushed the limits of decency.
"I got threesomes at the police station on top of a cop car. I got some wild stuff," Allen said.
And it's unlikely to be the last.
Allen lives two blocks east of Milwaukee Police District 7 where he claims to have recorded a sex video on top of a squad car, though FOX6 Investigators have seen no evidence of that.
As for the gas station, Allen says this isn't even the first pornographic video he recorded there. And he's telling the truth. In March of 2015, Allen uploaded a sex video to a website called World Star. It's cell phone video of Allen having intercourse with a woman up against the beverage coolers at the back of the 35th Hometown gas station. That video has more than 2-and-a-half million hits.
While Allen is known for producing these explicit videos in public places, FOX6 Investigators are not aware of any other businesses that have had license actions taken against them. We are also unaware of any other videos that show a business owner or employee watching the act take place.
As it stands, the 35th Hometown gas station will remain in operation while its parent company, Kool Petroleum sues the city over its business license. The next hearing is set for April 2, 2020, in Milwaukee County Circuit Court.


thelibertydaily--2020-02-10--There’s No Such Thing as a Good Democrat, Not Anymore

If anything is certain this election season , it ’ s that everything is uncertain .
Should the strong economy continue and nothing too crazy happens , it ’ s conceivable that Republicans could hang onto the executive , the Senate , and even regain the House .
President Trump will be on the ballot in all those districts Democrats swiped from Republicans , and now they ’ ll also have their own record , or lack thereof ( impeachment , anyone ? )
, upon which to run .
The Senate will come down to a few key races @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and North Carolina , but Democrats will have to win them all in order to gain the four seats needed to gain control ( three if they win the presidency ) .
And Trump is coming off what even HBO host Bill Maher called “ his best week ever ” following his Senate impeachment acquittal and widely acclaimed State of the Union address .
None of the three tasks - holding onto the executive and Senate and retaking the House - will be easy , but all are doable .
It ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
They have the numbers , and if their turnout exceeds our turnout in the right places they win , pure and simple .
However , the most probable scenario is that , whoever assumes the presidency in 2021 , government will remain divided .
If Trump does manage to win a second term in office this November , he will likely face at least one legislative branch controlled by Democrats .
If that branch is the Senate , good luck getting any judges or appointees confirmed .
If it ’ s the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ able to sneeze without Adam Schiff calling for an impeachment inquiry .
If it ’ s both , God help him .
But things weren ’ t always this way .
Richard Nixon won 301 electoral votes in 1968 and a crushing 520 in 1972 , but his party controlled neither the House nor the Senate any of the time he was in office .
Notably , Democrats did lose seats after Nixon ’ s 1972 landslide victory , from 247 House members to 243 and from 64 senators to 58 .
Hardly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ though Democratic nominee George McGovern only managed to win Massachusetts and Washington D.C .
Yet , Nixon was able to appoint four arguably conservative Supreme Court justices and a whopping 231 federal judges , 38 more than Franklin Roosevelt , and in half the time to boot .
The GOP didn ’ t sniff control of either legislative branch until Ronald Reagan ’ s 1980 victory propelled them to what became a six-year Senate majority run .
Despite his popularity and landslide 1984 reelection ( you know , the one where everyone said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ losers until Walter Mondale said , ‘ Hold my beer.
’ ) , the House remained firmly in Democratic hands .
Absent historical knowledge and given today ’ s mindset , one might guess that Reagan got some judges and appointees confirmed ( he did ) , yet failed to pass meaningful conservative legislation .
One might assume that , but one would be wrong .
In fact , Reagan ’ s signature Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 passed overwhelmingly in the Senate ( 89-11 ) and skated through the Democratic controlled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ capital gains tax to 20 percent , weakened the estate tax , cut corporate taxes , and slashed the top marginal tax rate 20 points , from 70 percent to 50 percent .
It also helped spur economic growth the likes of which America hadn ’ t experienced in decades .
Yes , Reagan ’ s April 1982 meeting with then Democratic House Speaker Tip O ’ Neill formed the foundation for some compromises conservative didn ’ t like , but it also paved the way for some significant legislative accomplishments such as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Agree or disagree , Ronald Reagan signed a LOT of bills during his presidency , bills that were passed by a Democratic-controlled House .
It has worked the other way too , of course .
Bill Clinton reformed the welfare system with Republican help from a Congress controlled by the GOP .
Barack Obama worked with Republicans to make the George W. Bush tax cuts permanent .
Both also appointed a total of four Supreme Court justices with bipartisan support and very little significant opposition or obstruction from Republicans .
If your thought @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lines of “ My , how things have changed , ” you ’ re getting the message loud and clear .
Despite the precious few exceptions of trade and criminal justice reform , can anyone imagine President Trump getting Democratic help on anything considered remotely conservative these days ?
Of course not .
Can anyone imagine the Democratic-led House stopping its endless efforts to concoct something to remove Trump from office and focus on points of agreement and legislative ideas that are bipartisan and passable ?
Hell would freeze over .
But why @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to work with Democrats , so despite his bluster at times it ’ s hard to imagine he wouldn ’ t jump at the chance to do something good .
In fact , Republicans will all-too-often try to work with Democrats even to the detriment of their own stated principles .
No , the more likely alternative is that Democrats in office have changed as their constituencies have moved further and further to the hard left .
Consider the Blue Dog Coalition , that pack of supposedly “ conservative ” Democratic House members @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ fiscal responsibility , a strong national defense and bipartisan consensus rather than conflict with Republicans.
” There are currently 27 members , enough to give the GOP a majority - that is if any of those members were really interested in keeping America from becoming a quasi-socialist banana Republic .
If they were , any could easily follow in the steps of New Jersey ’ s Jeff Van Drew , but they haven ’ t , and they likely won ’ t .
Why ?
Because there are no good Democrats .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ moderate ” Democrats - folks like Arizona ’ s Kyrsten Sinema , West Virginia ’ s Joe Manchin , Montana ’ s Jon Tester , and even the soon-to-be former senator from Alabama , Doug Jones .
Sure , maybe some might join the GOP in voting for the occasional judge or Trump appointee when the result is already in the bag , but have any of these purported paragons of bipartisanship ever been the deciding vote on anything of importance ?
Of course not , because there are no good Democrats .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , when one Democratic senator would have meant a bipartisan acquittal and thus unallowable by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Shumer - all voted to convict .
Even the ‘ reasonable-sounding ’ Manchin was eventually corralled by Schumer into betraying his constituents who , albeit naively , allowed him to remain in office .
If Manchin ’ s betrayal in particular has taught us anything , it ’ s that in the end , it ’ s good to know the rules these days .
Republicans may range from solid to Mitt Romney squish @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , zero ‘ good ’ Democrats .
The age of the bipartisan Democrat is long gone , and isn ’ t likely to return .
If you live in a state where one is running , you ’ ve at least got a fighting chance voting for the R. Because the D is a no-win game with ZERO exceptions .

If anything is certain this election season, it’s that everything is uncertain. Should the strong economy continue and nothing too crazy happens, it’s conceivable that Republicans could hang onto the executive, the Senate, and even regain the House. President Trump will be on the ballot in all those districts Democrats swiped from Republicans, and now they’ll also have their own record, or lack thereof (impeachment, anyone?), upon which to run. The Senate will come down to a few key races in Maine, Arizona, Colorado, and North Carolina, but Democrats will have to win them all in order to gain the four seats needed to gain control (three if they win the presidency). And Trump is coming off what even HBO host Bill Maher called “his best week ever” following his Senate impeachment acquittal and widely acclaimed State of the Union address.
None of the three tasks - holding onto the executive and Senate and retaking the House - will be easy, but all are doable. It’s also conceivable that Democrats could sweep everything. They have the numbers, and if their turnout exceeds our turnout in the right places they win, pure and simple.
However, the most probable scenario is that, whoever assumes the presidency in 2021, government will remain divided. If Trump does manage to win a second term in office this November, he will likely face at least one legislative branch controlled by Democrats. If that branch is the Senate, good luck getting any judges or appointees confirmed. If it’s the House, Trump won’t be able to sneeze without Adam Schiff calling for an impeachment inquiry. If it’s both, God help him.
But things weren’t always this way. Richard Nixon won 301 electoral votes in 1968 and a crushing 520 in 1972, but his party controlled neither the House nor the Senate any of the time he was in office. Notably, Democrats did lose seats after Nixon’s 1972 landslide victory, from 247 House members to 243 and from 64 senators to 58. Hardly the stuff of national consensus, even though Democratic nominee George McGovern only managed to win Massachusetts and Washington D.C. Yet, Nixon was able to appoint four arguably conservative Supreme Court justices and a whopping 231 federal judges, 38 more than Franklin Roosevelt, and in half the time to boot.
The GOP didn’t sniff control of either legislative branch until Ronald Reagan’s 1980 victory propelled them to what became a six-year Senate majority run. Despite his popularity and landslide 1984 reelection (you know, the one where everyone said McGovern would always hold the record for losers until Walter Mondale said, ‘Hold my beer.’), the House remained firmly in Democratic hands.
Absent historical knowledge and given today’s mindset, one might guess that Reagan got some judges and appointees confirmed (he did), yet failed to pass meaningful conservative legislation. One might assume that, but one would be wrong. In fact, Reagan’s signature Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 passed overwhelmingly in the Senate (89-11) and skated through the Democratic controlled House 238-195. The act lowered the capital gains tax to 20 percent, weakened the estate tax, cut corporate taxes, and slashed the top marginal tax rate 20 points, from 70 percent to 50 percent. It also helped spur economic growth the likes of which America hadn’t experienced in decades. Yes, Reagan’s April 1982 meeting with then Democratic House Speaker Tip O’Neill formed the foundation for some compromises conservative didn’t like, but it also paved the way for some significant legislative accomplishments such as social security and criminal justice reform. Agree or disagree, Ronald Reagan signed a LOT of bills during his presidency, bills that were passed by a Democratic-controlled House.
It has worked the other way too, of course. Bill Clinton reformed the welfare system with Republican help from a Congress controlled by the GOP. Barack Obama worked with Republicans to make the George W. Bush tax cuts permanent. Both also appointed a total of four Supreme Court justices with bipartisan support and very little significant opposition or obstruction from Republicans.
If your thought process while reading this is along the lines of “My, how things have changed,” you’re getting the message loud and clear. Despite the precious few exceptions of trade and criminal justice reform, can anyone imagine President Trump getting Democratic help on anything considered remotely conservative these days? Of course not. Can anyone imagine the Democratic-led House stopping its endless efforts to concoct something to remove Trump from office and focus on points of agreement and legislative ideas that are bipartisan and passable? Hell would freeze over.
But why? Trump has always expressed a willingness to work with Democrats, so despite his bluster at times it’s hard to imagine he wouldn’t jump at the chance to do something good. In fact, Republicans will all-too-often try to work with Democrats even to the detriment of their own stated principles. No, the more likely alternative is that Democrats in office have changed as their constituencies have moved further and further to the hard left.
Consider the Blue Dog Coalition, that pack of supposedly “conservative” Democratic House members whose charter calls them to advocate for “fiscal responsibility, a strong national defense and bipartisan consensus rather than conflict with Republicans.” There are currently 27 members, enough to give the GOP a majority - that is if any of those members were really interested in keeping America from becoming a quasi-socialist banana Republic. If they were, any could easily follow in the steps of New Jersey’s Jeff Van Drew, but they haven’t, and they likely won’t. Why? Because there are no good Democrats.
Consider the Senate’s supposedly “moderate” Democrats - folks like Arizona’s Kyrsten Sinema, West Virginia’s Joe Manchin, Montana’s Jon Tester, and even the soon-to-be former senator from Alabama, Doug Jones. Sure, maybe some might join the GOP in voting for the occasional judge or Trump appointee when the result is already in the bag, but have any of these purported paragons of bipartisanship ever been the deciding vote on anything of importance? Of course not, because there are no good Democrats. Even on the impeachment of Donald Trump, when one Democratic senator would have meant a bipartisan acquittal and thus unallowable by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Shumer - all voted to convict. Even the ‘reasonable-sounding’ Manchin was eventually corralled by Schumer into betraying his constituents who, albeit naively, allowed him to remain in office.
If Manchin’s betrayal in particular has taught us anything, it’s that in the end, it’s good to know the rules these days. Republicans may range from solid to Mitt Romney squish, but there are no, nada, zero ‘good’ Democrats. The age of the bipartisan Democrat is long gone, and isn’t likely to return. If you live in a state where one is running, you’ve at least got a fighting chance voting for the R. Because the D is a no-win game with ZERO exceptions.
Follow Scott on Twitter @SKMorefield


thelibertydaily--2020-02-10--Americans From Venezuela Warn U.S. Voters in Powerful Video: Don’t Let Socialism Happen Here — ‘Bern

Americans From Venezuela Warn U.S. Voters in Powerful Video: Don’t Let Socialism Happen Here — ‘Bernie Sanders is Your Enemy’

Venezuelan Americans warn US voters in powerful video : Do n't let socialism happen here

It began with polls showing a growing number of Americans supporting socialism and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, an unabashed socialist, being called "the future" of the Democratic Party by DNC Chair Tom Perez. Now, with Bernie Sanders within striking distance of becoming the Democratic 2020 nominee, many Hispanics living in the United States are horrified at the prospect of a socialist rising to the country's highest office.
While some members of the media go to great lengths to argue that U.S. democratic socialists are different than Latin American leftists, some Venezuelan-Americans see little difference between the two. As they watch their native homeland fall apart from afar, they are now turning their attention to the 2020 race for the White House and warning Americans of the horrors of socialism.
'We thought what happened in Cuba would never happen to us'
Reached by telephone on Sunday, Daniel DiMartino, a young activist, told TheBlaze how many of his fellow countrymen were fooled by the late Hugo Chavez into believing the country was poorer than it actually was.
"We were able to put food on the table, work hard, and pay for what we wanted. We were rich but didn't know it," DiMartino said.
He added, "I don't want Americans to wake up one day and find themselves saying the same thing."
Meanwhile, Victor Perez, a Venezuelan-American finance executive in Miami, Fla., told TheBlaze that too many voters in the U.S. are allowing themselves to be misled by the likes of Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
"We were too arrogant to pay attention and we thought what happened in Cuba would never happen to us — we were wrong," Perez said while noting that he sees troubling parallels between the rationale of chavistas in Venezuela and the reasoning of American supporters of Sanders and other socialists.
"I'm now seeing the same arrogance from Bernie Sanders' backers and so-called 'democratic socialists' that we had. They say 'oh, but we have checks and balances that wouldn't allow that to happen.' You know who else thought that? We did! The same Venezuelans who are now searching through trash to find food," he said.
'Bernie Sanders is your enemy'
These sentiments were echoed in Washington, D.C. last last year when hundreds of Venezuelan expats gathered for a "Venezuela Freedom Rally" in the nation's capital.
According to Campus Reform, which covered the event, attendees were deeply troubled that so many Americans view socialism favorably.
"Bernie Sanders is your enemy. Do not ever, ever get involved with this individual or any of the other socialists," said one man, who added: "You do not ever want anyone even close to socialism to come to this country."
Another young woman said that while socialism promises to help the poor, it eventually fails them.
"People are eating from trash bags in the streets, so how has socialism actually helped the country?" she said, referring to the food shortages in the South American country.
"Check your history, look at the news. Look at all the countries that have failed under a socialist government, like Cuba, like Venezuela," another rally-goer noted.
Meanwhile, a young woman said that Americans should not fool themselves into believing that socialism cannot happen in the United States. "We also thought that this could never happen in our country. We had a balance of powers. We had democracy and we elected our leaders," she said while draped in a Venezuelan flag.
"In Venezuela, there is no food, no medicine, education. No, nothing, nothing," another woman stated.


thelibertydaily--2020-02-10--MSM Finally Asks Breadline Bernie Some (Fairly) Tough Questions — He Struggles Mightily

Given his near victorious performance in Iowa , Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders , a self-described Democrat Socialist , now has the full attention of the mainstream media , something that was evident as the 78-year-old made the Sunday talk show rounds .
On NBC ’ s ‘ Meet the Press , ’ host Chuck Todd pressed Sanders on how he would try to convince voters who believe the economy is going well for them that it is actually not going that well for them .
As you can see , he doesn ’ t really have an answer .
Todd @ @ @ @ @ @ @ well for them .
Sanders : For some of them , it may .
Todd : Yeah , it ’ s been working well .
That ’ s my point .
There ’ s just one problem for Sanders , many Americans do believe the economy is working well for them .
Sanders ’ entire premise , which is that everything is bad , is undermined by the fact that everything is actually not bad .
Sanders was also a guest on CBS ’ ‘ Face the Nation , ’ where host Margaret @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the same people who royally messed up the Iowa Caucuses to run Medicare for All .
Yet again , Sanders had no answer and even tried to make the case that his Medicare for All proposal is somehow not a government takeover of the health care system , even though everyone knows it is .
If he ’ s going to be the Democrat front-runner , he ’ s going to need to come up with some better answers .
Bernie Sanders declares ‘ worldwide emergency ’ on climate change ( as hypocrisy @ @ @ @ @ @

Given his near victorious performance in Iowa, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, a self-described Democrat Socialist, now has the full attention of the mainstream media, something that was evident as the 78-year-old made the Sunday talk show rounds.
On NBC’s ‘Meet the Press,’ host Chuck Todd pressed Sanders on how he would try to convince voters who believe the economy is going well for them that it is actually not going that well for them.
LISTEN: @ChuckTodd: "Somebody that likes their 401k right now but doesn't like Trump, how do you convince them to vote for you?"@BernieSanders: "We are going to create a economy that works for the middle-class…"@ChuckTodd: "But they think their economy works for them." pic.twitter.com/jMlFq0RJYP — Meet the Press (@MeetThePress) February 9, 2020
As you can see, he doesn’t really have an answer.
Todd: But they think their economy works well for them. Sanders: For some of them, it may. Todd: Yeah, it’s been working well. That’s my point.
There’s just one problem for Sanders, many Americans do believe the economy is working well for them.
‘THIS is why they are going apoplectic’: Gallup poll shows most Americans satisfied with the economy, national security https://t.co/Tk5KAYCz3G — Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) January 27, 2020
Sanders’ entire premise, which is that everything is bad, is undermined by the fact that everything is actually not bad.
This is the thing that Sanders is rarely confronted about: A record number of Americans think the economy is working well for them. Justification for Bernie’s extreme policies, which are designed to restructure/destroy that economy, depends on him simply rejecting that reality. https://t.co/AhIc8dkPv9 — (((AG))) (@AGHamilton29) February 9, 2020
This is why a sitting president with a good economy is pretty much unbeatable. Your opponents have no lane. You’re stuck trying to convince people how bad things suck. And that just doesn’t work. https://t.co/QR4ayOQZdE — Jesse Kelly (@JesseKellyDC) February 9, 2020
Sanders was also a guest on CBS’ ‘Face the Nation,’ where host Margaret Brennan pressed him why Americans should trust the same people who royally messed up the Iowa Caucuses to run Medicare for All.
CBS News’ Margaret Brennan grills Bernie Sanders: if Democrats can’t run a caucus, how can they take over health carehttps://t.co/Py1H0UGmoL pic.twitter.com/v6de7wvbP3 — RNC Research (@RNCResearch) February 9, 2020
Yet again, Sanders had no answer and even tried to make the case that his Medicare for All proposal is somehow not a government takeover of the health care system, even though everyone knows it is.
How stupid do these people (Bernie) think we are? https://t.co/okTNWrUoiv — KatG (@KatGkannon) February 9, 2020
If he’s going to be the Democrat front-runner, he’s going to need to come up with some better answers.
***
RELATED:
Bernie Sanders declares ‘worldwide emergency’ on climate change (as hypocrisy spotters have a field day)
‘It doesn’t frickin’ work!’ Socialism doesn’t give Chris Matthews a thrill up his leg, Bernie Sanders hardest hit