thelibertydaily--2020-09-26--Now Do Andrew Cuomo: Two Massachusetts Doctors Charged With Criminal Neglect for 76 Chi-Com Virus De

Now Do Andrew Cuomo: Two Massachusetts Doctors Charged With Criminal Neglect for 76 Chi-Com Virus Deaths at Veterans’ Home

The Massachusetts Attorney General has indicted two doctors on charges of criminal neglect in connection to the deaths of at least 76 veterans ' home residents who died of the novel coronavirus .
Bennett Walsh , 50 , and David Clinton , 71 , were indicted by a state grand jury on Thursday in connection to their work at the Holyoke Soldiers ' home in Massachusetts .
Each man was indicted on five counts , specifically for charges including `` wantonly or recklessly '' permitting or causing bodily harm and mistreatment of an older or disabled individual .
State investigators @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 27 , when staff at the facility combined two dementia wards containing patients with and without the novel illness .
The facility was short staffed and made the decision to combine units containing 42 residents – some of whom had the virus and some of whom did not .
Residents were packed by the half-dozen into rooms that typically only held four veterans , allowing the highly contagious disease to spread at an alarming rate .
The office of the Attorney General has said that Walsh and Clinton will be arraigned in Hampden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

The Massachusetts Attorney General has indicted two doctors on charges of criminal neglect in connection to the deaths of at least 76 veterans' home residents who died of the novel coronavirus.
Bennett Walsh, 50, and David Clinton, 71, were indicted by a state grand jury on Thursday in connection to their work at the Holyoke Soldiers' home in Massachusetts. Each man was indicted on five counts, specifically for charges including "wantonly or recklessly" permitting or causing bodily harm and mistreatment of an older or disabled individual.
State investigators zeroed in on the events of March 27, when staff at the facility combined two dementia wards containing patients with and without the novel illness. The facility was short staffed and made the decision to combine units containing 42 residents – some of whom had the virus and some of whom did not.
Residents were packed by the half-dozen into rooms that typically only held four veterans, allowing the highly contagious disease to spread at an alarming rate.
The office of the Attorney General has said that Walsh and Clinton will be arraigned in Hampden County Superior Court at a later date.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-26--Multi-Millionaire Hollywood Actor Danny Glover Joins Democrats in Calling for Slavery Reparations: ‘

Multi-Millionaire Hollywood Actor Danny Glover Joins Democrats in Calling for Slavery Reparations: ‘We Can’t Wait’

Actor and activist Danny Glover and former 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Tom Steyer joined Democratic lawmakers to call for the passage of a bill to set up a federal slavery reparations committee , emphasizing that `` we ca n't wait '' any longer for reparations .
`` We ca n't wait , '' Steyer said during a virtual discussion held as part of the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation 's annual legislative conference .
`` This is the moment .
The time for reparations is now .
We must confront and deal with our history together and repair it as best @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ever to move on together . ''
Glover , who endorsed Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders in the 2020 Democratic presidential primary , said the country has been `` trapped in its past '' for more than 400 years and called for a reparations proposal .
`` We ca n't wait because now is the time , '' he said .
`` Now is the moment .
Those legs and bodies marching in the street provides us with even more urgency for this moment . ''
Texas Democratic Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee is the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African-Americans Act .
New Jersey Democratic Sen. Cory Booker is sponsoring the Senate version .
Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti said he supports establishing a committee to study reparations for descendants of slaves and propose remedies .
`` We must not ignore our history .
We must acknowledge it , learn from it and act to right the wrongs of our past , that 's why I 'm such a big supporter of H.R .
40 , '' he said .
`` H.R .
40 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I am 100 % behind . ''
Both Jackson Lee and California Democratic Rep. Barbara Lee joined Glover , Steyer and other advocates during the reparations discussion .
`` Our message today is that we 're moving forward , '' Jackson Lee said .
Barbara Lee said the House version would likely not have 150 co-sponsors without Jackson Lee 's leadership .
`` We ca n't wait , '' she said .
`` We 're going to get this done soon . ''

Actor and activist Danny Glover and former 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Tom Steyer joined Democratic lawmakers to call for the passage of a bill to set up a federal slavery reparations committee, emphasizing that "we can't wait" any longer for reparations.
"We can't wait," Steyer said during a virtual discussion held as part of the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation's annual legislative conference. "This is the moment. The time for reparations is now. We must confront and deal with our history together and repair it as best we can together, if we're ever to move on together."
Glover, who endorsed Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders in the 2020 Democratic presidential primary, said the country has been "trapped in its past" for more than 400 years and called for a reparations proposal.
"We can't wait because now is the time," he said. "Now is the moment. Those legs and bodies marching in the street provides us with even more urgency for this moment."
Texas Democratic Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee is the sponsor of H.R. 40, the
Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African-Americans Act. New Jersey Democratic Sen. Cory Booker is sponsoring the Senate version.
Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti said he supports establishing a committee to study reparations for descendants of slaves and propose remedies.
"We must not ignore our history. We must acknowledge it, learn from it and act to right the wrongs of our past, that's why I'm such a big supporter of H.R. 40," he said. "H.R. 40 is only a beginning but one that I am 100% behind."
Both Jackson Lee and California Democratic Rep. Barbara Lee joined Glover, Steyer and other advocates during the reparations discussion.
"Our message today is that we're moving forward," Jackson Lee said.
Barbara Lee said the House version would likely not have 150 co-sponsors without Jackson Lee's leadership.
"We can't wait," she said. "We're going to get this done soon."


thelibertydaily--2020-09-27--Car Plows Through Trump Supporters as They Counter-Protested BLM in California

A car reportedly plowed through a crowd in California as Black Lives Matter protesters clashed with counter-protesters .
This is the third vehicle to hit protesters in California in just one week .
The incident in Yorba Linda , California reportedly occurred after counter-protesters crossed the highway to confront Black Lives Matter demonstrators .
The white sedan reportedly tore through both groups as their demonstrations met in a parking lot , but footage shows that the driver got in his car following an argument with Trump supporters and ripped through them .
At least two people were injured , according @ @ @ @ @ @ @ posted to social media show one individual bleeding from the knee .
Independent videographer Tomas Morales captured the aftermath of the violence .
`` Today was chaos .
BLM started 100 % everything .
They started pepper spraying for no reason .
I got peppered sprayed for filming & accosted , '' said Morales .
`` I was at their event & a BLM organizer was instructing people to use force against Trump supporters , '' Morales added .
Local reporter Brian Rokos tweeted a photo of a Sheriff helicopter , reportedly warning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to vacate the area .
The injured victims are currently in unknown condition .

A car reportedly plowed through a crowd in California as Black Lives Matter protesters clashed with counter-protesters. This is the third vehicle to hit protesters in California in just one week.
The incident in Yorba Linda, California reportedly occurred after counter-protesters crossed the highway to confront Black Lives Matter demonstrators. Initial reports suggested that the white sedan tore through both groups as their demonstrations met in a parking lot, but footage shows that the driver got in [her] car following an argument with Trump supporters and ripped through them.
Police arrested the driver, 40-year-old Tatiana Turner, and charged her with assault with a deadly weapon and attempted murder.
WATCH: A car ripped through a crowd of Trump supporters at a BLM counterprotest in Yorba Linda. It was clearly deliberate and the driver did not stop even as the Trump crowd gathered to tend to the wounded. Trump supporters did NOT attack the driver. pic.twitter.com/f9nu6L0WBu — Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) September 27, 2020
Initial reporting from The Orange County Register suggested that two people were injured.
The Orange County Sheriff's Department released a statement hours after the vehicular attack, stating that the protest resulted in two arrests, and two injuries.
"On September 17, the Orange County Sheriff's Department became aware of a protest planned in the city of Yorba Linda for today at 2p.m. by a group called Caravan for Justice. Shortly after, a counter protest was planned for the same time. Deputies were present at the beginning of the protests to protect the constitutional rights of all individuals and to protect life and property. Just after the beginning of the protests, it is estimated there were approximately 150 individuals total," the police wrote.
Caravan for Justice is a Black Lives Matter-affiliated organization that drove through California following the death of George Floyd in late May.
"Approximately 30 minutes after the protests began, we began to receive reports of physical altercations occurring between the two protest groups, including at least one individual who was pepper sprayed by another protester," stated the police.
Statements on the ground provided to The Post Millennial by independent videographer Tomas Morales suggests that Caravan for Justice protesters pepper sprayed Trump supporters without cause or provocation.
"Today was chaos. BLM started 100% everything. They started pepper spraying for no reason. I got peppered sprayed for filming & accosted," said Morales. "I was at their event & a BLM organizer was instructing people to use force against Trump supporters."
According to the police, the physical altercations and reports of individuals in the crowd having weapons prompted them to declare an unlawful assembly and issue a dispersal order. One man, Jason Mancuso, 46, of Anaheim, was reportedly arrested for refusing to obey the order.
"At approximately 3p.m. after several dispersal orders, a vehicle in the parking lot of the Yorba Linda Public Library at 18181 Imperial Highway struck at least two individuals," stated the OCSD. "The driver, believed to be part of the Caravan for Justice, continued to leave the parking lot and was detained a short distance away from the incident. The two people struck, a man and a woman believed to be at the protest, were transported to a nearby hospital with major injuries but are expected to survive."
According to police, the driver, Tatiana Turner, 40, of Long Beach, was arrested for assault with a deadly weapon and attempted murder. Police say she will be booked into the Orange County Jail and that an investigation is ongoing.
Images posted to social media show one individual bleeding from the knee.
A car just drove through a crowd. The crowd then chased after the white sedan. This person was hurt. pic.twitter.com/0iAhWkcRnu — Brian Rokos (@Brian_Rokos) September 26, 2020
Independent videographer Tomas Morales captured the aftermath of the violence.
*GRAPHIC* Trump supporter was struck by a car. Details unclear on who hit the man. His ankle is visibly broken. #YorbaLinda pic.twitter.com/zhqcFcE8Gt — Tomas Morales (@TomasMorales_iv) September 26, 2020
Someone ran their car through a crowd of Trump supporters. OC Sheriffs took the person into custody. Ambulances were dispatched, but I don't have information on injuries pic.twitter.com/EAWBSXS8R1 — Border Photog #blm (@desertborder) September 26, 2020
YORBA LINDA: BLM supporter pepper sprays man for no reason (only caught the tail end).
She then proceeds to pepper spray me for filming & a woman tells me to go to the other side. I was wearing plain clothes and recording the BLM speakers earlier. pic.twitter.com/MbvjjJkpPp — Tomas Morales (@TomasMorales_iv) September 26, 2020
"I was at their event & a BLM organizer was instructing people to use force against Trump supporters," Morales added.
#YorbaLinda: BLM organizer was instructing the crowd to push people with flags away.
“Once they start putting that thing in your face, push it to the side” pic.twitter.com/1koqsavffb — Tomas Morales (@TomasMorales_iv) September 27, 2020
2:25pm shortly after the March for Equality event gathered, a man not affiliated with BLM was pepper sprayed for being in the area.
This was starting point for what followed after. #YorbaLinda pic.twitter.com/Ijg4hP25sU — Tomas Morales (@TomasMorales_iv) September 27, 2020
Local reporter Brian Rokos tweeted a photo of a Sheriff helicopter, reportedly warning the crowd that they had five minutes to vacate the area.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-27--Back the Blue With Our New Thin Blue Line Coffee Mug!

Date , old to new Date , new to old

Every piece of our merchandise is made with your values in mind. And a patriotic spirit lives within ALL of our customers, so wear your patriotism proudly.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-27--DOJ Sends Scathing Letter Demanding San Francisco Lift ‘Draconian’ Church Restrictions

The Justice Department is attacking San Francisco ’ s “ draconian ” restrictions on the number of people allowed at one time into houses of worship .
The city currently allows no more than one congregant at a time in any church , synagogue , mosque or other place of worship , regardless of its size .
“ No government in this free country can attack religion by transforming a house of worship arbitrarily into a place for solitary confinement , ” said Eric Dreiband , assistant attorney general for the Justice Department ’ s Civil Rights Division , according @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ People of faith go to churches , synagogues , mosques , and other places to worship with their fellow believers , and they can do so lawfully because the First Amendment to the United States Constitution makes illegal any effort by government to prohibit the free exercise of religion , ” Dreiband said .
“ That we are dealing with a very serious public health crisis does not permit government to discriminate against religious worshipers by imposing a one-person-per-house-of-worship rule while permitting larger numbers of people to gather in tattoo parlors , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other places , ” he added .
TRENDING : Cartoon Shows Difference Between What BLM / Antifa Says Versus What They Actually Mean “ There is no pandemic exception to the United States Constitution and its Bill of Rights.
” In contrast to the limit of one congregant per house of worship , gyms , tattoo parlors , hair salons , massage studios and daycare centers can have multiple people present at any one time , as the DOJ pointed out .
A Friday letter to Democratic San Francisco Mayor London Breed from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ District of California David Anderson said that “ San Francisco ’ s treatment of places of worship raises serious concerns about religious freedom .
“ In particular , the limitation of indoor worship to one congregant without regard to the size of the place of worship is draconian , out of step with the treatment afforded other similar indoor activities in San Francisco , wholly at odds with this Nation ’ s traditional understanding of religious liberty , and may violate the First Amendment to the Constitution , ” the letter said .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ about the Constitution .
“ The First Amendment protects religious observers against unequal treatment , ” it said .
“ Government may not discriminate against religious gatherings compared to other nonreligious gatherings that have the same effect on the government ’ s public health interest , absent compelling reasons.
” “ The Health Order provides no reasoned explanation why its one-size-fits-all limit on indoor religious gatherings , regardless of size , is necessary or appropriate .
This policy is not equal treatment , ” the letter said , adding that “ this restriction @ @ @ @ @ @ @ free exercise of religion.
” The letter noted that rules for barber shops , nail salons , massage locations and tattoo parlors allow them to accommodate more people at one time than houses of worship .
“ These rules plainly discriminate against people of faith and their ability to gather and practice their faith at churches , synagogues , mosques , and other houses of worship , ” the letter said .
“ Put simply , there is no scientific or legal justification for permitting a 20,000 square foot synagogue to admit only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to accommodate as many patrons as it can fit so long as they are six feet apart .
This is not the kind of reasonable , temporary , and narrowly tailored regulation to protect public health and safety that can justify infringements on fundamental rights such as religious freedom.
” The city ’ s goal of upping the limit to 25 people as of the end of the month “ would also continue to disadvantage religious exercise compared to the permitted secular indoor activities described above , ” Dreiband and Anderson wrote .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to “ change its current standards to bring them in line with the Constitution and our nation ’ s best traditions of free religious exercise.
” San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera was unmoved , pointing to the low coronavirus infection rate in the city .
“ We must be doing something right , ” he said , according to Fox News .
Herrera said the federal government “ should focus on an actual pandemic response instead of lobbing careless legal threats .
San Francisco is opening up at the speed of safety.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Western Journal .

The Justice Department is attacking San Francisco’s “draconian” restrictions on the number of people allowed at one time into houses of worship.
The city currently allows no more than one congregant at a time in any church, synagogue, mosque or other place of worship, regardless of its size.
“No government in this free country can attack religion by transforming a house of worship arbitrarily into a place for solitary confinement,” said Eric Dreiband, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, according to a Friday DOJ news release.
“People of faith go to churches, synagogues, mosques, and other places to worship with their fellow believers, and they can do so lawfully because the First Amendment to the United States Constitution makes illegal any effort by government to prohibit the free exercise of religion,” Dreiband said.
“That we are dealing with a very serious public health crisis does not permit government to discriminate against religious worshipers by imposing a one-person-per-house-of-worship rule while permitting larger numbers of people to gather in tattoo parlors, hair salons, massage studios, and other places,” he added.
“There is no pandemic exception to the United States Constitution and its Bill of Rights.”
In contrast to the limit of one congregant per house of worship, gyms, tattoo parlors, hair salons, massage studios and daycare centers can have multiple people present at any one time, as the DOJ pointed out.
A Friday letter to Democratic San Francisco Mayor London Breed from Dreiband and U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of California David Anderson said that “San Francisco’s treatment of places of worship raises serious concerns about religious freedom.
“In particular, the limitation of indoor worship to one congregant without regard to the size of the place of worship is draconian, out of step with the treatment afforded other similar indoor activities in San Francisco, wholly at odds with this Nation’s traditional understanding of religious liberty, and may violate the First Amendment to the Constitution,” the letter said.
The letter tried to educate San Francisco about the Constitution.
“The First Amendment protects religious observers against unequal treatment,” it said.
“Government may not discriminate against religious gatherings compared to other nonreligious gatherings that have the same effect on the government’s public health interest, absent compelling reasons.”
“The Health Order provides no reasoned explanation why its one-size-fits-all limit on indoor religious gatherings, regardless of size, is necessary or appropriate. This policy is not equal treatment,” the letter said, adding that “this restriction suggests hostility to religious people and the free exercise of religion.”
The letter noted that rules for barber shops, nail salons, massage locations and tattoo parlors allow them to accommodate more people at one time than houses of worship.
“These rules plainly discriminate against people of faith and their ability to gather and practice their faith at churches, synagogues, mosques, and other houses of worship,” the letter said.
“Put simply, there is no scientific or legal justification for permitting a 20,000 square foot synagogue to admit only one worshipper while allowing a tattoo parlor to accommodate as many patrons as it can fit so long as they are six feet apart. This is not the kind of reasonable, temporary, and narrowly tailored regulation to protect public health and safety that can justify infringements on fundamental rights such as religious freedom.”
The city’s goal of upping the limit to 25 people as of the end of the month “would also continue to disadvantage religious exercise compared to the permitted secular indoor activities described above,” Dreiband and Anderson wrote.
The letter closed by asking the city to “change its current standards to bring them in line with the Constitution and our nation’s best traditions of free religious exercise.”
San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera was unmoved, pointing to the low coronavirus infection rate in the city.
“We must be doing something right,” he said, according to Fox News.
Herrera said the federal government “should focus on an actual pandemic response instead of lobbing careless legal threats. San Francisco is opening up at the speed of safety.”
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-27--Ted Cruz Warns Democrats Will Try to ‘Destroy’ Amy Coney Barrett

Sen. Ted Cruz ( R-TX ) on Saturday lauded President Donald Trump ’ s nominee for the Supreme Court — Judge Amy Coney Barrett — and warned that Senate Democrats will once again attempt to “ destroy her reputation for “ political gain.
” Judge Amy Coney Barrett currently serves on the U.S .
Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit with honor and distinction , and I look forward to supporting her nomination to the Supreme Court of the United States .
Before her confirmation to the Seventh Circuit , Judge Barrett was a respected academic and award-winning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Law School , where she continues to teach .
Judge Barrett clerked for Judge Laurence Silberman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C .
Circuit and the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia .
Though Judge Barrett ’ s credentials are impeccable , I have no doubt Senate Democrats will try to destroy her reputation for political gain , because they already tried to do just that .
In 2017 , when she was nominated to the Seventh Circuit , my Democratic colleagues on the Senate Judiciary Committee interrogated Judge Barrett @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but for her faith .
It was a shameful exercise of religious bigotry , the likes of which should have long ago been relegated to the history books .
Judge Barrett is well-qualified to serve on the United States Supreme Court .
Having confirmed her to the circuit court in 2017 with bipartisan support , the Senate has already undertaken a thorough and rigorous review of her record .
Let me be clear : Democrats ’ expected attempts to derail this process , along with their contempt for Judge Barrett and her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In 2017 , Sen. Dianne Feinstein ( D-CA ) , the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee , drew outrage when she raised concerns about Barrett ’ s Catholic beliefs during the judge ’ s nomination hearing for the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals .
“ I think in your case , professor , when you read your speeches , the conclusion one draws is that the dogma lives loudly within you , ” the senator told the judge at the time .
“ And that ’ s of concern when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ numbers of people have thought for , for years in this country.
” Earlier Saturday , President Trump announced Coney Barrett as his nominee to replace the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court , calling the pick “ one of his highest and most important duties ” as president .
“ She is a woman of unparalleled achievement , towering intellect , sterling credentials and unyielding loyalty to the Constitution , ” the president said in his remarks in the Rose Garden .
In her remarks , Coney Barrett said that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the confidence that President Trump had placed in her and expressed appreciation for his support and kindness .
“ I fully understand that this is a momentous decision for a president , and if the Senate does me the honor of confirming me , I pledge to discharge the responsibilities of this job to the very best of my ability , ” she said .
“ I love the United States , and I love the United States Constitution.
” The Senate will hold confirmation hearings for Coney Barrett starting October 12 , @ @ @ @ @

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) on Saturday lauded President Donald Trump’s nominee for the Supreme Court — Judge Amy Coney Barrett — and warned that Senate Democrats will once again attempt to “destroy her reputation for “political gain.”
Cruz said in a statement [emphasis added]:
Judge Amy Coney Barrett currently serves on the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit with honor and distinction, and I look forward to supporting her nomination to the Supreme Court of the United States. Before her confirmation to the Seventh Circuit, Judge Barrett was a respected academic and award-winning professor at the University of Notre Dame Law School, where she continues to teach. Judge Barrett clerked for Judge Laurence Silberman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. Though Judge Barrett’s credentials are impeccable, I have no doubt Senate Democrats will try to destroy her reputation for political gain, because they already tried to do just that. In 2017, when she was nominated to the Seventh Circuit, my Democratic colleagues on the Senate Judiciary Committee interrogated Judge Barrett not for her record or her qualifications, but for her faith. It was a shameful exercise of religious bigotry, the likes of which should have long ago been relegated to the history books. Judge Barrett is well-qualified to serve on the United States Supreme Court. Having confirmed her to the circuit court in 2017 with bipartisan support, the Senate has already undertaken a thorough and rigorous review of her record. Let me be clear: Democrats’ expected attempts to derail this process, along with their contempt for Judge Barrett and her faith, will not impede this nomination.
In 2017, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, drew outrage when she raised concerns about Barrett’s Catholic beliefs during the judge’s nomination hearing for the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.
“I think in your case, professor, when you read your speeches, the conclusion one draws is that the dogma lives loudly within you,” the senator told the judge at the time. “And that’s of concern when you come to big issues that large numbers of people have thought for, for years in this country.”
Earlier Saturday, President Trump announced Coney Barrett as his nominee to replace the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court, calling the pick “one of his highest and most important duties” as president.
“She is a woman of unparalleled achievement, towering intellect, sterling credentials and unyielding loyalty to the Constitution,” the president said in his remarks in the Rose Garden.
In her remarks, Coney Barrett said that she was “deeply honored” by the confidence that President Trump had placed in her and expressed appreciation for his support and kindness.
“I fully understand that this is a momentous decision for a president, and if the Senate does me the honor of confirming me, I pledge to discharge the responsibilities of this job to the very best of my ability,” she said. “I love the United States, and I love the United States Constitution.”
The Senate will hold confirmation hearings for Coney Barrett starting October 12, the Associated Press reports.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-27--Chuck Schemer: Senate Democrats ‘United in Opposition’ to Barrett . . .

During a press conference on Saturday , Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer ( D-NY ) stated that Senate Democrats are @ @ @ @ @ to the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court and that Democrats @ @ @ @ @ the Senate , along with 2020 Democratic presidential nominee former Vice President Joe Biden are @ @ @ @ @ American people ” to the risk posed to their health care by the Barrett nomination @ @ @ @ @ My colleagues are united in opposition .
Many of them have issued statements in opposition @ @ @ @ @ .
Democrats House , Senate , and Joe Biden in alerting the American people to @ @ @ @ @ their health care , their very health care they depend on , with this nomination @ @

During a press conference on Saturday, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) stated that Senate Democrats are “united in opposition” to the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court and that Democrats in both the House and the Senate, along with 2020 Democratic presidential nominee former Vice President Joe Biden are united “in alerting the American people” to the risk posed to their health care by the Barrett nomination.
Schumer said, “My colleagues are united in opposition. Many of them have issued statements in opposition, and we are united. Democrats House, Senate, and Joe Biden in alerting the American people to the danger, danger to their health care, their very health care they depend on, with this nomination.”
Follow Ian Hanchett on Twitter @IanHanchett


thelibertydaily--2020-09-27--President Trump Surging With Hispanic and Black Voters In Critical States

Joe Biden has a problem .
Actually , he has a few problems .
Recent polling shows that Donald Trump is running much stronger with Hispanics and black voters than he did in 2016 .
Those are demographic groups that Biden needs to win big if he has any hope of winning the election .
If Trump ’ s strength with these voters continues , it will doom Biden and lead to a second Trump term .
In Florida , an NBC/Marist poll conducted earlier this month showed President Trump with 50 percent of the Hispanic vote to Biden ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Clinton won 62 percent of Hispanics compared to 35 percent for Trump .
Trump is also outperforming 2016 with black Floridians .
The same poll shows him with 11 percent support compared to 8 percent in the last election .
If those numbers hold , Florida is simply unwinnable for Biden .
Polling in other states tells a similar story .
A poll of 750 likely voters conducted for the Center for American Greatness in Nevada by Rasmussen Reports shows Biden leading Trump by just a single point ( 49 percent to 48 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump is running strong with Hispanics , getting 47 percent support to Biden ’ s 49 percent .
For comparison , Trump got 29 percent of the Hispanic vote in 2016 to Hillary Clinton ’ s 60 percent .
The poll also shows Trump with 41 percent of the black vote .
Interestingly , he also ran stronger among bin Nevada in 2016 than he did nationally , so this is a continuation of that trend .
The Nevada survey also shows Trump with a slightly higher favorability rating compared to Biden ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ undercuts the narrative that this is a race between a likable Biden and an unlikable Trump .
This despite the constant drubbing Trump takes from elite media and the concomitant puffing of Biden .
Voters already have a fixed opinion of Donald Trump .
But it turns out that they have one of Biden , too—and it ’ s not especially positive .
But it ’ s the loss of support among groups that historically have backed Democrats in a big way that must be a cause for concern among Democrats .
If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in places like Arizona and North Carolina then the Biden campaign has a very narrow path to victory while Trump ’ s options increase .
Here ’ s why : There are essentially two tiers of battleground states .
One group consists of Arizona , Florida , and North Carolina .
These are all states that Trump won in 2016 that Democrats believe they can win this year .
All three states lean Republican , but each has its own story offering Democrats a glimmer of hope .
Arizona , for example , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the first time in decades .
If Biden can pick off even one of these states then would need to sweep the battleground states in the upper Midwest to win the election .
Those states comprise the second group : Pennsylvania , Michigan , Wisconsin , and Minnesota .
Trump won the first three in 2016 but by less than 80,000 votes combined .
And he narrowly lost Minnesota .
If Trump holds the states in the first group as he appears likely to do then Biden has to win big in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that Clinton won by small margins like Nevada ( six electoral votes ) and New Hampshire ( four electoral votes ) .
Clinton only won Nevada by 27,000 votes and New Hampshire by about 2,600 .
As a practical matter , if Arizona , Florida , and North Carolina trend toward Trump over the next month , that would allow the campaign to focus more resources in those Midwestern states that would put him over the top .
And it would cause Biden to spend time and money in states like Nevada that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The Center for American Greatness Nevada poll also hints at some further problems for Biden .
Even some of his supporters don ’ t think he ’ ll win .
This suggests an enthusiasm gap favoring the president .
Only 34 percent of Hispanics and 48 percent of blacks think Biden will win the election .
If there is a further break towards one candidate or the other , don ’ t underestimate voters ’ desire to back the one they believe will be the winner .
Enthusiasm counts because it drives @ @ @ @ @ @ @ votes on election day .
So the fact that only 66 percent of all Democrats in Nevada believe he will win compared to the 83 percent of Republicans who believe Trump will win points to a problem .
This is consistent with the enthusiasm gap we ’ ve seen elsewhere .
During the summer , polling by the Center for American Greatness in Florida revealed that 72 percent of Trump voters strongly supported him compared to only 56 percent of Biden ’ s supporters strongly favoring him .
The fact that President Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ black voters runs counter to the dominant narrative .
But it shouldn ’ t .
He got more votes from those two groups than Romney , McCain , or Bush .
This is just a continuation of that trend .
If it holds through election day , it will probably mean victory for Donald Trump .

Joe Biden has a problem. Actually, he has a few problems. Recent polling shows that Donald Trump is running much stronger with Hispanics and black voters than he did in 2016. Those are demographic groups that Biden needs to win big if he has any hope of winning the election. If Trump’s strength with these voters continues, it will doom Biden and lead to a second Trump term.
In Florida, an NBC/Marist poll conducted earlier this month showed President Trump with 50 percent of the Hispanic vote to Biden’s 46 percent. In 2016, Clinton won 62 percent of Hispanics compared to 35 percent for Trump. Trump is also outperforming 2016 with black Floridians. The same poll shows him with 11 percent support compared to 8 percent in the last election. If those numbers hold, Florida is simply unwinnable for Biden.
Polling in other states tells a similar story. A poll of 750 likely voters conducted for the Center for American Greatness in Nevada by Pulse Opinion shows Biden leading Trump by just a single point (49 percent to 48 percent). As in Florida, Trump is running strong with Hispanics, getting 47 percent support to Biden’s 49 percent.
(View the crosstabs and topline results.)
For comparison, Trump got 29 percent of the Hispanic vote in 2016 to Hillary Clinton’s 60 percent. The poll also shows Trump with 41 percent of the black vote. Interestingly, he also ran stronger among bin Nevada in 2016 than he did nationally, so this is a continuation of that trend.
The Nevada survey also shows Trump with a slightly higher favorability rating compared to Biden (48 percent versus 46 percent) which undercuts the narrative that this is a race between a likable Biden and an unlikable Trump. This despite the constant drubbing Trump takes from elite media and the concomitant puffing of Biden.
Voters already have a fixed opinion of Donald Trump. But it turns out that they have one of Biden, too—and it’s not especially positive.
But it’s the loss of support among groups that historically have backed Democrats in a big way that must be a cause for concern among Democrats. If the trends seen in these polls apply in places like Arizona and North Carolina then the Biden campaign has a very narrow path to victory while Trump’s options increase. Here’s why:
There are essentially two tiers of battleground states. One group consists of Arizona, Florida, and North Carolina. These are all states that Trump won in 2016 that Democrats believe they can win this year. All three states lean Republican, but each has its own story offering Democrats a glimmer of hope.
Arizona, for example, elected a Democratic senator in 2018 for the first time in decades. If Biden can pick off even one of these states then would need to sweep the battleground states in the upper Midwest to win the election. Those states comprise the second group: Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota. Trump won the first three in 2016 but by less than 80,000 votes combined. And he narrowly lost Minnesota.
If Trump holds the states in the first group as he appears likely to do then Biden has to win big in the Midwest—and he can’t lose states that Clinton won by small margins like Nevada (six electoral votes) and New Hampshire (four electoral votes). Clinton only won Nevada by 27,000 votes and New Hampshire by about 2,600.
As a practical matter, if Arizona, Florida, and North Carolina trend toward Trump over the next month, that would allow the campaign to focus more resources in those Midwestern states that would put him over the top. And it would cause Biden to spend time and money in states like Nevada that he’ll be afraid to lose.
The Center for American Greatness Nevada poll also hints at some further problems for Biden. Even some of his supporters don’t think he’ll win. This suggests an enthusiasm gap favoring the president.
Only 34 percent of Hispanics and 48 percent of blacks think Biden will win the election. If there is a further break towards one candidate or the other, don’t underestimate voters’ desire to back the one they believe will be the winner.
Enthusiasm counts because it drives donations and activism during the campaign and votes on election day. So the fact that only 66 percent of all Democrats in Nevada believe he will win compared to the 83 percent of Republicans who believe Trump will win points to a problem.
This is consistent with the enthusiasm gap we’ve seen elsewhere. During the summer, polling by the Center for American Greatness in Florida revealed that 72 percent of Trump voters strongly supported him compared to only 56 percent of Biden’s supporters strongly favoring him.
The fact that President Trump is increasing his support among Hispanic and black voters runs counter to the dominant narrative. But it shouldn’t. He got more votes from those two groups than Romney, McCain, or Bush. This is just a continuation of that trend. If it holds through election day, it will probably mean victory for Donald Trump.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-27--Hundreds Gather for Prayer March in Branson, Missouri

A little over 100 people marched the streets of Branson Saturday for one reason , prayer .
“ I saw that Franklin Graham is having one in Washington D.C. and I thought we needed one here in Branson as well , ” said Organizer Gena Hedgpeth .
Organizer Gena Hedgpeth said the purpose is to pray over the community and the nation .
“ With everything going on in the world right now there ’ s so much and we ’ re just crying out to God to heal our land .
We ’ re wanting to see lives changed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to go , '' said Hedgpeth .
The march was a little over five miles and they took the scenic route .
Walking down the Branson Strip , Main Street and the Landing .
“ We ’ re going to stop five times between here and the landing and have pastor led prayer over specific topics , '' said Hedgpeth .
Pamela Thomas is a resident here in Branson and said it was a wonderful site seeing all of the people marching through her community .
“ I think it ’ s the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ We need more people to get out and participate , '' said Pamela Thomas .
Hedgpeth said the event was strictly prayer nothing political .
“ I wanted to do this because I wanted to march across our entire town .
We ’ re praying for everybody .
We ’ re praying for all of our leaders , locally .
We ’ re praying for everything all around the world .
For revival , '' said Hedgpeth .
They prayed over local law enforcement once they hit their last stop .
If you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whole route they provided a shuttle service .

BRANSON, Mo. (KY3) -
A little over 100 people marched the streets of Branson Saturday for one reason, prayer.
“I saw that Franklin Graham is having one in Washington D.C. and I thought we needed one here in Branson as well,” said Organizer Gena Hedgpeth.
Organizer Gena Hedgpeth said the purpose is to pray over the community and the nation.
“With everything going on in the world right now there’s so much and we’re just crying out to God to heal our land. We’re wanting to see lives changed, unity and all of the division to go," said Hedgpeth.
The march was a little over five miles and they took the scenic route. Walking down the Branson Strip, Main Street and the Landing.
“We’re going to stop five times between here and the landing and have pastor led prayer over specific topics," said Hedgpeth.
Pamela Thomas is a resident here in Branson and said it was a wonderful site seeing all of the people marching through her community.
“I think it’s the best thing that’s happened. We need more people to get out and participate," said Pamela Thomas.
Hedgpeth said the event was strictly prayer nothing political.
“I wanted to do this because I wanted to march across our entire town. We’re praying for everybody. We’re praying for all of our leaders, locally. We’re praying for everything all around the world. For revival," said Hedgpeth.
They prayed over local law enforcement once they hit their last stop.
If you weren’t able to walk the whole route they provided a shuttle service.
Copyright 2020 KY3. All rights reserved.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-27--ICYMI: Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein’s Husband Named In ‘Problematic’ Connection With College Ad

ICYMI: Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein’s Husband Named In ‘Problematic’ Connection With College Admissions Scandal

Imagine paying $ 500,000 like Full House star Lori Laughlin to ensure your kid gets into USC .
Sure , the University of Southern California is a prestigious institution and it takes high grades to be accepted – but it ’ s not exactly Ivy League !
Check out this report on how California Senator Dianne Feinstein ’ s husband is involved , via Fox News : Trending : Pelosi : If GOP Moves Forward With SCOTUS Nomination ‘ There Has To Be A Price To Pay ’ The audit , released earlier this week , found that 64 students @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leaders , or other people with influence got into four of the state ’ s top public universities – beating out peers who were more qualified academically or athletically between 2013 and 2019. take our poll - story continues below Trump or Biden , who will win ?
• None Why wait until November 3 ?
Show all of America who you 're voting for in 2020 • None This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged .
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at anytime .
You also agree to this site 's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use .
And it singled out one case as “ particularly problematic.
” “ UC Berkeley appears to have admitted this student because of an inappropriate letter of support from a university regent , ” the report reads .
That regent , in violation of policy , sent a letter directly to the chancellor of UC Berkeley after the student was placed on a waitlist , according to the audit .
Despite having a 26 percent chance of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ merits of the application , the student ultimately gained admission .
The auditor ’ s office identified that regent as Sen. Feinstein ’ s husband Richard Blum on Thursday , according to multiple local reports .
Feinstein should always be remembered as the person behind the initial attempted takedown of future Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh .
The senator “ received ” a “ letter ” from Christine Blasey Ford and sat on it for a good while before letting the nation in on her secret .
Like every single one of her @ @ @ @ @ @ @

Imagine paying $500,000 like Full House star Lori Laughlin to ensure your kid gets into USC. Sure, the University of Southern California is a prestigious institution and it takes high grades to be accepted – but it’s not exactly Ivy League!
Eh, whatever.
Check out this report on how California Senator Dianne Feinstein’s husband is involved, via Fox News:
The audit, released earlier this week, found that 64 students with ties to major donors, university leaders, or other people with influence got into four of the state’s top public universities – beating out peers who were more qualified academically or athletically between 2013 and 2019. And it singled out one case as “particularly problematic.”
CONTINUED:
“UC Berkeley appears to have admitted this student because of an inappropriate letter of support from a university regent,” the report reads. That regent, in violation of policy, sent a letter directly to the chancellor of UC Berkeley after the student was placed on a waitlist, according to the audit. Despite having a 26 percent chance of getting into the school based on the merits of the application, the student ultimately gained admission. The auditor’s office identified that regent as Sen. Feinstein’s husband Richard Blum on Thursday, according to multiple local reports.
Feinstein should always be remembered as the person behind the initial attempted takedown of future Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
The senator “received” a “letter” from Christine Blasey Ford and sat on it for a good while before letting the nation in on her secret.
Like every single one of her liberal peers, Dianne is crooked.
Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success!


thelibertydaily--2020-09-27--ICYMI: Ginsburg On NFL Players Kneeling for National Anthem: ‘It’s Dumb & Disrespectful’

If the mainstream media reported on these quotes from Ruth Bader Ginsburg about NFL players kneeling for the national anthem , a lot of lefties would be very , very disappointed .
Ginsburg and conservatives may not have agreed on most issues but at the end of the day , the former Supreme Court justice appeared to be a Democrat who actually loved her country .
Check this out , via Breitbart : Trending : Pelosi : If GOP Moves Forward With SCOTUS Nomination ‘ There Has To Be A Price To Pay ’ As America continues to reflect on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bader Ginsburg , it is notable to remember that she was not a supporter of former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick ’ s protests during the national anthem .
take our poll - story continues below RBG added , “ If they want to be stupid , there ’ s no law that should be preventive .
If they want to be arrogant , there ’ s no law that prevents them from that .
What I would do is strongly take issue with the point of view that they are expressing when they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the Twitter world on RBG ’ s passing…

If the mainstream media reported on these quotes from Ruth Bader Ginsburg about NFL players kneeling for the national anthem, a lot of lefties would be very, very disappointed.
Ginsburg and conservatives may not have agreed on most issues but at the end of the day, the former Supreme Court justice appeared to be a Democrat who actually loved her country.
Check this out, via Breitbart:
As America continues to reflect on the life of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, it is notable to remember that she was not a supporter of former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick’s protests during the national anthem.
[…]
“I think it’s really dumb of them,” Ginsburg said of Kaepernick’s protests during an interview with Katie Couric in October of 2016.
RBG added, “If they want to be stupid, there’s no law that should be preventive. If they want to be arrogant, there’s no law that prevents them from that. What I would do is strongly take issue with the point of view that they are expressing when they do that.“
Here are some reactions from the Twitter world on RBG’s passing…
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1307151318201622528
We have lost one of the most extraordinary Justices ever to serve on the Supreme Court. Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s life and landmark opinions moved us closer to a more perfect union. And her powerful dissents reminded us that we walk away from our Constitution’s promise at our peril. pic.twitter.com/dDECiBxae6 — Bill Clinton (@BillClinton) September 19, 2020
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1307146028555014145
This is the scene at the Supreme Court tonight after the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Thousands of people are gathered here, with hundreds sitting on the steps https://t.co/Cg9oNILOPx 📷: @evansemones #RBG #SCOTUS pic.twitter.com/kw1xGBLl3m — POLITICO (@politico) September 19, 2020
Hillary Clinton called on Senate Democrats to use every possible “procedural obstacle” to stop Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) from replacing Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. https://t.co/IlmXIDugvt — Breitbart News (@BreitbartNews) September 19, 2020
Ruth Bader Ginsburg was confirmed 42 days after she was nominated by President Bill Clinton. @RealDonaldTrump's nominee should get the same speedy consideration by the Senate. — Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) September 19, 2020
‘I feel really moved that she fought until the very end for American women’ — Mourners gather to pay tribute to Ruth Bader Ginsburg outside the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. pic.twitter.com/ojpqFCcpUh — NowThis (@nowthisnews) September 19, 2020
Mourners join in a rendition of "Imagine" by John Lennon as they honor the legacy of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the standard bearer for the court's liberal wing and a progressive icon. https://t.co/QcBKdeDxe2 pic.twitter.com/62Sh502TdS — ABC News (@ABC) September 19, 2020
Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success!


thelibertydaily--2020-09-28--NY Times Fake News Tries to Sabotage Durham Probe: ‘Chasing Down Conspiracy Theories’

The New York Times on Friday tried to sabotage U.S. Attorney John Durham ’ s investigation into the origins of “ Russiagate ” by denigrating it as a futile pursuit of conspiracy theories .
As a bonus , the Times was able to mount a defense of their second-favorite political couple .
Reporters Adam Goldman , William Rashbaum , and Nicole Hong filed “ In Politically Charged Inquiry , Prosecutor Sought Details About Clintons : ” From the beginning , John H. Durham ’ s inquiry into the Russia investigation has been politically charged .
President Trump promoted it as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” plot against him , Attorney General William P. Barr rebuked the investigators under scrutiny , and he and Mr. Durham publicly second-guessed an independent inspector general and traveled the globe to chase down conspiracy theories .
It turns out that Mr. Durham also focused attention on certain political enemies of Mr. Trump : the Clintons .
Mr. Durham , the U.S. attorney in Connecticut assigned by Mr. Barr to review the Russia inquiry , has sought documents and interviews about how federal law enforcement officials handled an investigation around the same time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Clinton Foundation , according to people familiar with the matter .
The approach is highly unusual , according to people briefed on the investigation .
Though the suspected crimes themselves are not comparable -- one involves a possible conspiracy between a presidential campaign and a foreign adversary to interfere in an election , and the other involves potential bribery and corruption -- and largely included different teams of investigators and prosecutors , Mr. Durham ’ s efforts suggest the scope of his review is broader than previously known .
Mr. Durham ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as concerns deepen among Democrats and some former Justice Department officials that his investigation is being weaponized politically to help Mr. Trump… .

The New York Times on Friday tried to sabotage U.S. Attorney John Durham’s investigation into the origins of “Russiagate” by denigrating it as a futile pursuit of conspiracy theories. As a bonus, the Times was able to mount a defense of their second-favorite political couple. Reporters Adam Goldman, William Rashbaum, and Nicole Hong filed “In Politically Charged Inquiry, Prosecutor Sought Details About Clintons:”
From the beginning, John H. Durham’s inquiry into the Russia investigation has been politically charged. President Trump promoted it as certain to uncover a “deep state” plot against him, Attorney General William P. Barr rebuked the investigators under scrutiny, and he and Mr. Durham publicly second-guessed an independent inspector general and traveled the globe to chase down conspiracy theories.
It turns out that Mr. Durham also focused attention on certain political enemies of Mr. Trump: the Clintons.
Mr. Durham, the U.S. attorney in Connecticut assigned by Mr. Barr to review the Russia inquiry, has sought documents and interviews about how federal law enforcement officials handled an investigation around the same time into allegations of political corruption at the Clinton Foundation, according to people familiar with the matter.
….
The approach is highly unusual, according to people briefed on the investigation. Though the suspected crimes themselves are not comparable -- one involves a possible conspiracy between a presidential campaign and a foreign adversary to interfere in an election, and the other involves potential bribery and corruption -- and largely included different teams of investigators and prosecutors, Mr. Durham’s efforts suggest the scope of his review is broader than previously known.
Mr. Durham’s focus on the Clinton Foundation inquiry comes as concerns deepen among Democrats and some former Justice Department officials that his investigation is being weaponized politically to help Mr. Trump….


thelibertydaily--2020-09-28--Back the Blue With Our New Thin Blue Line Coffee Mug!

Date , old to new Date , new to old


thelibertydaily--2020-09-28--NYPD Officer Shuts Down ‘Male Karen’ Who Questions Him and Another Officer For Not Wearing Face Diap

NYPD Officer Shuts Down ‘Male Karen’ Who Questions Him and Another Officer For Not Wearing Face Diapers

A recent video taken by a NYU student shows him confronting two NYPD officers for not wearing masks inside a Brooklyn subway station .
One of the officers brushed him off as a “ male version of Karen.
” The interaction came just one day after the MTA directed the city ’ s cops to crack down on maskless transit riders with $ 50 fines .
Mihai Ciocan , an 18-year-old freshman at NYU , said he was walking through the Clark Street station in Brooklyn on Tuesday night when he passed two officers without face coverings in a narrow @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to you guys or just me if I don ’ t wear a mask in the subway ?
” he inquired .
“ Actually , it states that as long as you can maintain six feet of distance , you don ’ t have to wear the mask , ” Officer McMahon replied .
“ If you want to step within six feet of me , I ’ ll gladly put on the mask.
” After Ciocan pointed out that the two officers were standing close to each other , the second officer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mask , asked whether the teenager had anything better to do .
“ You ’ re the person who calls someone , when someone ’ s selling a water bottle on the streets , you ’ re the person who calls them .
Alright Karen .
You ’ re the male version of Karen , ” said the second cop , identified by the teen as Officer Saeed .
“ Take care , Karen.
” Ciocan , who shared video of the confrontation on his TikTok page , said he was taken aback @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ It ’ s kind of shocking .
I know New York was hit really hard by the pandemic .
I expected better from them , ” he told Gothamist .
“ It doesn ’ t really match up with the whole ‘ Courtesy , Professionalism and Respect ’ thing I keep seeing on their cars.
” Asked about the cop ’ s use of the term Karen — a popular meme typically applied to white women who call the police on people of color — Ciocan responded : “ Good for him @ @ @ @ @ @ @ school.
” A spokesperson for the NYPD did not respond to Gothamist ’ s inquiries about the video .
“ Everyone in the transit system is required to wear a mask – it ’ s the law – no exceptions , ” NYC Transit President Sarah Feinberg said in a statement .
“ This is a matter of respect for fellow New Yorkers , including our customers and employees , and for public health and safety.
” The transit agency did not say whether anyone had been fined for refusing to wear a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interaction before he found it “ shocking ” that the officers weren ’ t wearing masks in the subway just a day after the MTA ’ s fine went into effect .
He added that he ’ s disappointed by the interaction and hopes more will be done to make sure everyone follows the rules .
“ I just feel like equating [ ‘ Karen ’ ] to just asking why they weren ’ t wearing a mask wasn ’ t really appropriate , ” Ciocan said , adding that seeing officers wear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for them to gain trust from the community .
Back in June , Gov .
Andrew Cuomo told police officers , who were often seen without a mask during protests and other encounters , to also follow the mandate .
But other New Yorkers say they continue to see cops on duty without face coverings .
“ It sends a message that they ’ re above the law , they can do what they want and they don ’ t care if they ’ re hurting people , ” said Ken L. of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the NYPD tells NBC New York that it ’ s important officers are reinforcing best health practices and wearing a mask for their own safety .
The department went on to say they ’ re doing spot checks of officers throughout the system .
The MTA has said that enforcement officers will issue a fine as a last resort .
Officers are expected to first offer you a free mask and if you refuse , then you could be issued a fine .

A recent video taken by a NYU student shows him confronting two NYPD officers for not wearing masks inside a Brooklyn subway station. One of the officers brushed him off as a “male version of Karen.”
The interaction came just one day after the MTA directed the city’s cops to crack down on maskless transit riders with $50 fines.
From Gothamist:
Mihai Ciocan, an 18-year-old freshman at NYU, said he was walking through the Clark Street station in Brooklyn on Tuesday night when he passed two officers without face coverings in a narrow mezzanine. “Does the fine apply to you guys or just me if I don’t wear a mask in the subway?” he inquired.
“Actually, it states that as long as you can maintain six feet of distance, you don’t have to wear the mask,” Officer McMahon replied. “If you want to step within six feet of me, I’ll gladly put on the mask.”
After Ciocan pointed out that the two officers were standing close to each other, the second officer, who is also not wearing a mask, asked whether the teenager had anything better to do.
“You’re the person who calls someone, when someone’s selling a water bottle on the streets, you’re the person who calls them. Alright Karen. You’re the male version of Karen,” said the second cop, identified by the teen as Officer Saeed. “Take care, Karen.”
Ciocan, who shared video of the confrontation on his TikTok page, said he was taken aback by the officer’s comments.
“It’s kind of shocking. I know New York was hit really hard by the pandemic. I expected better from them,” he told Gothamist. “It doesn’t really match up with the whole ‘Courtesy, Professionalism and Respect’ thing I keep seeing on their cars.”
Asked about the cop’s use of the term Karen — a popular meme typically applied to white women who call the police on people of color — Ciocan responded: “Good for him. He probably got bullied in high school.”
A spokesperson for the NYPD did not respond to Gothamist’s inquiries about the video.
“Everyone in the transit system is required to wear a mask – it’s the law – no exceptions,” NYC Transit President Sarah Feinberg said in a statement. “This is a matter of respect for fellow New Yorkers, including our customers and employees, and for public health and safety.”
The transit agency did not say whether anyone had been fined for refusing to wear a mask.
From NBC 4:
Ciocan says he recorded the interaction before he found it “shocking” that the officers weren’t wearing masks in the subway just a day after the MTA’s fine went into effect. He added that he’s disappointed by the interaction and hopes more will be done to make sure everyone follows the rules.
“I just feel like equating [‘Karen’] to just asking why they weren’t wearing a mask wasn’t really appropriate,” Ciocan said, adding that seeing officers wear a mask would be the easiest way for them to gain trust from the community.
Back in June, Gov. Andrew Cuomo told police officers, who were often seen without a mask during protests and other encounters, to also follow the mandate. But other New Yorkers say they continue to see cops on duty without face coverings.
“It sends a message that they’re above the law, they can do what they want and they don’t care if they’re hurting people,” said Ken L. of Brooklyn Heights.
In a statement, the NYPD tells NBC New York that it’s important officers are reinforcing best health practices and wearing a mask for their own safety. The department went on to say they’re doing spot checks of officers throughout the system.
The MTA has said that enforcement officers will issue a fine as a last resort. Officers are expected to first offer you a free mask and if you refuse, then you could be issued a fine.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-28--NY Times Fake News “Journalist” Attacks Amy Coney Barrett For Being a Working Mother, Then Backtrack

NY Times Fake News “Journalist” Attacks Amy Coney Barrett For Being a Working Mother, Then Backtracks After Backlash

A New York Times Magazine journalist lambasted Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett over being a working mother - but backtracked her jabs after being heckled on Twitter .
Vanessa Grigoriadis , who writes about sexual power dynamics for a number of major media outlets , on Saturday wrote a series of tweets that seemed to imply that a woman could not simultaneously work and be a loving mother .
After garnering nearly 18,000 responses - many of them sharply critical - Grigoriadis tweeted that Barrett is `` an inspiration and a girl boss . ''
The sequence unfolded on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump announced Barrett as his official choice for Supreme Court justice , to fill the spot vacated by the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg .
Grigoriadis quickly weighed in about the nomination , posting her views on social media .
`` I guess one of the things I do n't understand about Amy Coney Barrett is how a potential Supreme Court justice can also be a loving , present mom to seven kids ? ''
Grigoriadus wrote on Twitter .
`` Is this like the Kardashians stuffing nannies in the closet and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for their kids . ''
The writer then tweeted a critique that brought in Barrett 's religion : '' And if there are n't enough hours in the day for her to work and mother those kids , when she portrays herself as a home-centered Catholic who puts family over career , is n't she telling a lie ? ''
Twitter users quickly posted counter-critiques , accusing Grigoriadis of denigrating working women , and of being sexist and anti-religious .
Wrote one woman : `` So you ’ re saying a mom can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had 2 children in medical school , 1 in residency , one immediately after .
I have 4 emotionally healthy married adult children raising their own families now .
A strong marriage and a strong faith in God was important in the process . ''
Others pointed out that such commentary would not be allowed in a job interview , and that the issue was not raised about Justice Antonin Scalia , who had nine children .
`` Anyway , more power to ACB and her ability to raise 7 kids , '' @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with her is that I believe she ’ ll make abortion illegal , destroy any chance for national childcare , and gut healthcare .
But besides that she is an inspiration and a girl boss . ''
`` Nice save ! ''
wrote one man .
`` But let 's do even better .
Congratulate Judge Barrett on her professional success and her loving family and praise her as an inspiration to all Americans .
And remind the American public that the Supreme Court does n't have those powers and they should look @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the celebrity Madonna claimed she felt `` raped '' by a 2019 profile Grigoriadis wrote about her for the New York Times Magazine .
The article focused disproportionately on Madonna 's age , the singer reportedly claimed , and proved that the New York Times is ‘ one of the founding fathers of the Patriarchy .
’

A New York Times Magazine journalist lambasted Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett over being a working mother - but backtracked her jabs after being heckled on Twitter.
Vanessa Grigoriadis, who writes about sexual power dynamics for a number of major media outlets, on Saturday wrote a series of tweets that seemed to imply that a woman could not simultaneously work and be a loving mother. After garnering nearly 18,000 responses - many of them sharply critical - Grigoriadis tweeted that Barrett is "an inspiration and a girl boss."
The sequence unfolded on Sept. 26, shortly after President Donald Trump announced Barrett as his official choice for Supreme Court justice, to fill the spot vacated by the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Grigoriadis quickly weighed in about the nomination, posting her views on social media.
"I guess one of the things I don't understand about Amy Coney Barrett is how a potential Supreme Court justice can also be a loving, present mom to seven kids?" Grigoriadus wrote on Twitter. "Is this like the Kardashians stuffing nannies in the closet and pretending they've drawn their own baths for their kids."
The writer then tweeted a critique that brought in Barrett's religion:
"And if there aren't enough hours in the day for her to work and mother those kids, when she portrays herself as a home-centered Catholic who puts family over career, isn't she telling a lie?"
Twitter users quickly posted counter-critiques, accusing Grigoriadis of denigrating working women, and of being sexist and anti-religious.
Wrote one woman: "So you’re saying a mom can’t be a professional? I had 2 children in medical school, 1 in residency, one immediately after. I have 4 emotionally healthy married adult children raising their own families now. A strong marriage and a strong faith in God was important in the process."
Others pointed out that such commentary would not be allowed in a job interview, and that the issue was not raised about Justice Antonin Scalia, who had nine children.
Grigoriadis soon changed her position.
"Anyway, more power to ACB and her ability to raise 7 kids," she wrote. "My only problem with her is that I believe she’ll make abortion illegal, destroy any chance for national childcare, and gut healthcare. But besides that she is an inspiration and a girl boss."
Twitter users again responded with skepticism.
"Nice save!" wrote one man. "But let's do even better. Congratulate Judge Barrett on her professional success and her loving family and praise her as an inspiration to all Americans. And remind the American public that the Supreme Court doesn't have those powers and they should look to Congress."
In 2019, the celebrity Madonna claimed she felt "raped" by a 2019 profile Grigoriadis wrote about her for the New York Times Magazine. The article focused disproportionately on Madonna's age, the singer reportedly claimed, and proved that the New York Times is ‘one of the founding fathers of the Patriarchy.’


thelibertydaily--2020-09-27--Hacks at Fake News NY Times Focus on Trump’s Tax Returns AGAIN Rather than the Biden Crime Family’s

Hacks at Fake News NY Times Focus on Trump’s Tax Returns AGAIN Rather than the Biden Crime Family’s Cash for Russian Hookers and Moscow Millions . . .

For years the liberal press and Democrat politicians have pressured President Donald Trump to release his tax returns .
Of course , their insistence on seeing Trump ’ s returns makes it likely that they already knew what was in the returns — which was likely leaked to them by partisan hacks in the Internal Revenue Service .
Since Obama served as president we suddenly have trusted US institutions like the IRS , FBI and DOJ loaded with partisan Democrats who put their corrupt liberal politics before integrity and the rule of law .
On Sunday The New York Times @ @ @ @ @ @ @ returns saying the president did not pay taxes some years because of huge losses .
The NY Times found NOTHING on Russia nor any of the phony scandals the anti-Trump publication has been reporting on for years .
TRENDING : BREAKING : TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE !
Durham Investigation Report Before November Election is UNLIKELY !
-- DEEP STATE WINS !
-- Video This must have been a huge disappointment .
This comes days after the Senate Finance and Homeland Security Committees released their report on on Hunter Biden , Burisma and massive Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Joe and Hunter Biden and revealed Hunter sent “ thousands of dollars ” to people who appear to be involved in the sex industry , including non-resident alien women in the US who are citizens of Russia or Ukraine !
But rather than reporting HONESTLY to their readers the New York Times decided to re-run President Trump ’ s tax returns .
This is why NO ONE trusts the fake news mainstream media .
The liberal media has been leaking and reporting on Trump ’ s tax returns for years now .

For years the liberal press and Democrat politicians have pressured President Donald Trump to release his tax returns.
Of course, their insistence on seeing Trump’s returns makes it likely that they already knew what was in the returns — which was likely leaked to them by partisan hacks in the Internal Revenue Service. Since Obama served as president we suddenly have trusted US institutions like the IRS, FBI and DOJ loaded with partisan Democrats who put their corrupt liberal politics before integrity and the rule of law.
On Sunday The New York Times reported on President Trump’s tax returns saying the president did not pay taxes some years because of huge losses.
The NY Times found NOTHING on Russia nor any of the phony scandals the anti-Trump publication has been reporting on for years.
This must have been a huge disappointment.
New York Times says Trump paid no taxes in some years, because of huge losses. They found nothing on Russia and no Michael Cohen. They confirmed he has been under audit a long time. And nothing illegal, apparently — except the IRS leak.https://t.co/jHsrA9qriQ via @BreitbartNews — Joel Pollak (@joelpollak) September 27, 2020
This comes days after the Senate Finance and Homeland Security Committees released their report on on Hunter Biden, Burisma and massive Biden family corruption.
The report was devastating for Joe and Hunter Biden and revealed Hunter sent “thousands of dollars” to people who appear to be involved in the sex industry, including non-resident alien women in the US who are citizens of Russia or Ukraine!
But rather than reporting HONESTLY to their readers the New York Times decided to re-run President Trump’s tax returns.
This is why NO ONE trusts the fake news mainstream media.
The liberal media has been leaking and reporting on Trump’s tax returns for years now.
2017–
2017–
2018–
2019–
2019–
2019–
2020–


thelibertydaily--2020-09-27--. . . And President Trump Rips NY Times Story as ‘Total Fake’

President Trump dismissed a published report on Sunday asserting that he paid only $ 750 in federal income taxes in 2016 and 2017 , calling it “ a total fake.
” “ It will all be revealed , it ’ s going to come out , ” Mr. Trump said of his tax records at a White House press conference .
“ I paid a lot [ of federal taxes ] , and I paid a lot of state income taxes , too.
” He didn ’ t say how much he has paid in federal income tax in those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ under audit by the IRS .
“ The story is a total fake , ” the president said .
“ It will be revealed .
When you are under audit , you just don ’ t release them.
” The New York Times , saying it has obtained 20 years ’ worth of “ tax return data ” for Mr. Trump and his companies , said he hasn ’ t paid any income taxes in 10 of the previous 15 years .
The report said he hasn ’ t paid income taxes mainly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than he made .
The president said his tax filings for his businesses are “ very complete , they ’ re very big , they ’ re very powerful , they ’ re very accurate.
” But they remain private , he said .
The report said Mr. Trump ’ s decade-long audit battle with the IRS centers on the legitimacy of a $ 72.9 million tax refund that he claimed , and received , after declaring huge losses .
“ They ’ re doing their assessment , ” Mr. Trump said of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been negotiating for a long time.
” He said of the Times ’ report , “ that ’ s why the media have such a low approval rating .
”

President Trump dismissed a published report on Sunday asserting that he paid only $750 in federal income taxes in 2016 and 2017, calling it “a total fake.”
“It will all be revealed, it’s going to come out,” Mr. Trump said of his tax records at a White House press conference. “I paid a lot [of federal taxes], and I paid a lot of state income taxes, too.”
He didn’t say how much he has paid in federal income tax in those years, saying that he is still under audit by the IRS.
“The story is a total fake,” the president said. “It will be revealed. When you are under audit, you just don’t release them.”
The New York Times, saying it has obtained 20 years’ worth of “tax return data” for Mr. Trump and his companies, said he hasn’t paid any income taxes in 10 of the previous 15 years. The report said he hasn’t paid income taxes mainly because he reported losing much more money than he made.
The president said his tax filings for his businesses are “very complete, they’re very big, they’re very powerful, they’re very accurate.” But they remain private, he said.
The report said Mr. Trump’s decade-long audit battle with the IRS centers on the legitimacy of a $72.9 million tax refund that he claimed, and received, after declaring huge losses.
“They’re doing their assessment,” Mr. Trump said of the IRS. “We’ve been negotiating for a long time.”
He said of The Times’ report, “that’s why the media have such a low approval rating.”
• Dave Boyer can be reached at dboyer@washingtontimes.com.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-28--New Twitter Account Gets Recommendations to Follow 57 Leftists Before Showing a Single Conservative

In April , I was locked out of my Twitter account .
I was not banned , but once I was locked out I no longer had access to the phone number or email that I had originally used when I created it in November , 2008 .
Yes , I had been on Twitter for a long time and it never occurred to me to change my identifying data .
For months , I ’ ve reached out to Twitter to regain access .
It ’ s not just an old and decently sized account ( 33k followers ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that I didn ’ t want to lose .
So , it ’ s sitting there in limbo and Twitter won ’ t help me get it back .
After checking with their Terms of Service and determining that since I wasn ’ t banned , I could create a new account , I finally relented to do so yesterday .
I set my only interest as “ Politics ” and proceeded to the step where it suggests people to follow .
What I found was absolutely shocking .
At first , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suggestions with Democrats like Maxine Waters , Barack Obama , and Pete Buttigieg .
But then I kept scrolling .
“ Oh , there ’ s Devin Nunes , ” I thought when I got down to # 8 on the list .
As it turned out , it was actually an anti-Nunes parody account called “ Devin Nunes ’ cow , ” but I followed it anyway .
I kept scrolling .
Kamala Harris .
Richard Blumenthal .
Nancy Pelosi , twice .
I kept scrolling .
Mika Brzezinski .
Adam Schiff @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Karine Jean-Pierre .
Scrolling , scrolling , scrolling .
Finally , after 57 leftists and/or Democrats , I got to my first conservative… Devin Nunes .
The real Devin Nunes .
I thought that perhaps , JUST perhaps , Twitter saw I was in California and their algorithm assumed I was a leftist .
So , I called a friend in Montana who never had a Twitter account .
I walked her through , having her put in the same “ Politics ” interest and nothing else .
What she saw was different @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had her first Republican pop up after 53 progressives .
Not only is she not a leftist , but she swears she doesn ’ t know anyone in her community who is .
Here are the screenshots in order : Needless to say , I unfollowed Devin Nunes ’ cow , then followed the real thing as well as Tucker Carlson , who was listed after Nunes before another batch of a bunch of leftists .
It was absolutely ridiculous that giving the generic interest of “ Politics ” triggers Twitter into recommending @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about the overt suppression and censorship on social media , but it ’ s the subtle , behind-the-scenes algorithmic leftism in Big Tech that poses the biggest threat .
They ’ re unhinged , and they want everyone else to be unhinged with them .
COVID-19 may take down an independent news outlet Nobody said running a media site would be easy .
We could use some help keeping this site afloat .
Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever .
My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has never been my forte , but we ’ ve survived .
We have ads on the site that help , but since the site ’ s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn ’ t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it .
When I left a nice , corporate career in 2017 , I did so knowing I wouldn ’ t make nearly as much money .
But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth .
We know we ’ ll never make a ton of money this way , and we ’ re okay with that .
Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns .
Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically .
We thought we could weather the storm , but the so-called “ surge ” or “ 2nd-wave ” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ desperate need of financial assistance .
The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate .
Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly .
Alternatively , you can donate through PayPal as well .
We need approximately $ 11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020 , but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated .
The second way to help is to become a partner .
We ’ ve strongly considered seeking angel investors @ @ @ @ @ @ @ paying the bills , it didn ’ t seem necessary .
Now , we ’ re struggling to pay the bills .
This shouldn ’ t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically .
June , 2018 , we had 11,678 visitors .
A year later in June , 2019 , we were up to 116,194 .
In June , 2020 , we had 614,192 .
We ’ re heading in the right direction and we believe we ’ re ready talk to patriotic investors who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the action ” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth .
Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above .
Election year or not , coronavirus lockdowns or not , anarchic riots or not , the need for truthful journalism endures .
But in these times , we need as many conservative media voices as possible .
Please help keep NOQ Report going .
Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prompted many , even some conservatives , to promote authoritarianism .
It ’ s understandable to some extent now , but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life .
We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
In April, I was locked out of my Twitter account. I was not banned, but once I was locked out I no longer had access to the phone number or email that I had originally used when I created it in November, 2008. Yes, I had been on Twitter for a long time and it never occurred to me to change my identifying data. For months, I’ve reached out to Twitter to regain access. It’s not just an old and decently sized account (33k followers) but it also held my 21k+ Tweets that I didn’t want to lose. So, it’s sitting there in limbo and Twitter won’t help me get it back.
After checking with their Terms of Service and determining that since I wasn’t banned, I could create a new account, I finally relented to do so yesterday. I set my only interest as “Politics” and proceeded to the step where it suggests people to follow. What I found was absolutely shocking. At first, it was humorous that they would front-load the suggestions with Democrats like Maxine Waters, Barack Obama, and Pete Buttigieg. But then I kept scrolling.
“Oh, there’s Devin Nunes,” I thought when I got down to #8 on the list. As it turned out, it was actually an anti-Nunes parody account called “Devin Nunes’ cow,” but I followed it anyway. I kept scrolling. Kamala Harris. Richard Blumenthal. Nancy Pelosi, twice. I kept scrolling. Mika Brzezinski. Adam Schiff. Joe Biden’s senior advisor Karine Jean-Pierre.
Scrolling, scrolling, scrolling. Finally, after 57 leftists and/or Democrats, I got to my first conservative… Devin Nunes. The real Devin Nunes. I thought that perhaps, JUST perhaps, Twitter saw I was in California and their algorithm assumed I was a leftist. So, I called a friend in Montana who never had a Twitter account. I walked her through, having her put in the same “Politics” interest and nothing else. What she saw was different, but only a bit. She had her first Republican pop up after 53 progressives. Not only is she not a leftist, but she swears she doesn’t know anyone in her community who is.
Here are the screenshots in order:
Needless to say, I unfollowed Devin Nunes’ cow, then followed the real thing as well as Tucker Carlson, who was listed after Nunes before another batch of a bunch of leftists. It was absolutely ridiculous that giving the generic interest of “Politics” triggers Twitter into recommending nothing but leftists.
We all know about the overt suppression and censorship on social media, but it’s the subtle, behind-the-scenes algorithmic leftism in Big Tech that poses the biggest threat. They’re unhinged, and they want everyone else to be unhinged with them.
COVID-19 may take down an independent news outlet
Nobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.
Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it.
When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that.
Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance.
We’re LIVE and everything is on sale for a limited time! Whole Cows has launched offering freeze-dried beef for long-term storage. Don’t wait for food shortages to get worse. Stock up today. Use promo code “launch15” at checkout for 15% off!
The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated.
The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above.
Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.
Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast.
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


thelibertydaily--2020-09-28--Breadline Bernie Boasts That There Are A ‘Number Of Plans’ To Remove Trump From White House

Bernie Sanders has divulged what has become increasingly apparent : that there are a number of plans in the works to forcibly remove President Trump from office if he refuses to accept the results of a stolen election .
The man whose followers are rioting , looting and terrorizing law-abiding citizens chatted with HBO 's Bill Maher on Friday where he confirmed that Democrats and their Deep State allies are not going to tolerate a second Trump term .
***Help Us TAKE DOWN The Liberal Media With Our TRUMP News Mobile App !
*** With the days ticking down until @ @ @ @ @ @ @ troops whipped up into a blood frenzy over the filling of the Supreme Court seat vacated when Ruth Bader Ginsburg died , a man who has spent years calling for a revolution is giddy about the prospect .
Like other Democrats , Sanders is nervous that Trump would not guarantee his surrender if there is trickery with voter fraud , ballot harvesting and legal shenanigans , all of which the resistance has already baked into the cake .
“ Never in a million years did I ever think that I would have to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do if a president refuses to leave office if he loses .
I never , ever thought that I would have to give that speech , or anyone else .
But that is where we are today ” Via The Hill , “ Sanders tells Maher ‘ there will be a number of plans ’ to remove Trump if he loses ” : Sen. Bernie Sanders ( I-Vt. ) looked to assure nervous Democrats that there are “ a number of plans ” to deal with a scenario in which President Trump loses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ office .
Sanders , speaking to TV host Bill Maher Friday night , said it was of tantamount importance that liberals elect Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden but that Democrats will have contingency plans to remove Trump from office if he refuses to go .
“ The bottom line is , there are things that we have to do now to make sure that Biden wins .
And if Trump attempts to stay in office after losing , there will be a number of plans out there to make sure that he is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ But right now , in the next five weeks , our job is to defeat him and defeat him badly.
” In normal times in a country with a functioning media , such remarks would have been treated as the ravings of a crank and for years , Sanders existed on the fringes of the Democrat party until 2016 .
However , a sinister group that calls itself the Transition Integrity Project which serves as an alliance between Democrats , Never Trump RINOs , neocons , and embittered members of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scenario that is exactly what Sanders is talking about .
According to the New York Times : ... conveniently , a group of former top government officials called the Transition Integrity Project actually gamed four possible scenarios , including one that doesn ’ t look that different from 2016 : a big popular win for Mr. Biden , and a narrow electoral defeat , presumably reached after weeks of counting the votes in Pennsylvania .
For their war game , they cast John Podesta , who was Hillary Clinton ’ s campaign chairman @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
They expected him , when the votes came in , to concede , just as Mrs. Clinton had .
But Mr. Podesta , playing Mr. Biden , shocked the organizers by saying he felt his party wouldn ’ t let him concede .
Alleging voter suppression , he persuaded the governors of Wisconsin and Michigan to send pro-Biden electors to the Electoral College .
In that scenario , California , Oregon , and Washington then threatened to secede from the United States if Mr. Trump took office as planned .
The House @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and White House stuck with Mr. Trump .
At that point in the scenario , the nation stopped looking to the media for cues , and waited to see what the military would do .
Hillary herself gave credence to how far that they are prepared to go when she urged Biden to not concede under any circumstances .
Sanders who is the Vladimir I. Lenin of the American communist movement has managed to poison the minds of young people who have been seduced by the siren song of free stuff and racial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the same Deep State forces that orchestrate the regime change agenda abroad .
It is crystal clear that the Democrats and their intelligence community allies are not going to allow a legitimate election , take it from Bernie .

Bernie Sanders has divulged what has become increasingly apparent: that there are a number of plans in the works to forcibly remove President Trump from office if he refuses to accept the results of a stolen election.
The man whose followers are rioting, looting and terrorizing law-abiding citizens chatted with HBO’s Bill Maher on Friday where he confirmed that Democrats and their Deep State allies are not going to tolerate a second Trump term.
***Help Us TAKE DOWN The Liberal Media With Our TRUMP News Mobile App!***
With the days ticking down until the election and the party’s shock troops whipped up into a blood frenzy over the filling of the Supreme Court seat vacated when Ruth Bader Ginsburg died, a man who has spent years calling for a revolution is giddy about the prospect.
Like other Democrats, Sanders is nervous that Trump would not guarantee his surrender if there is trickery with voter fraud, ballot harvesting and legal shenanigans, all of which the resistance has already baked into the cake.
"*" indicates required fields Would you rather........ * Eat ice cream with Joe Biden? Anything else......literally. Email * This poll subscribes you to our premium network of content. Unsubscribe at any time. Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
According to Comrade Bernie:
“Never in a million years did I ever think that I would have to give a speech about what do we do if a president refuses to leave office if he loses. I never, ever thought that I would have to give that speech, or anyone else. But that is where we are today”
Via The Hill, “Sanders tells Maher ‘there will be a number of plans’ to remove Trump if he loses”:
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) looked to assure nervous Democrats that there are “a number of plans” to deal with a scenario in which President Trump loses the November election but refuses to leave office. Sanders, speaking to TV host Bill Maher Friday night, said it was of tantamount importance that liberals elect Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden but that Democrats will have contingency plans to remove Trump from office if he refuses to go. “The bottom line is, there are things that we have to do now to make sure that Biden wins. And if Trump attempts to stay in office after losing, there will be a number of plans out there to make sure that he is evicted from office,” he said. “But right now, in the next five weeks, our job is to defeat him and defeat him badly.”
In normal times in a country with a functioning media, such remarks would have been treated as the ravings of a crank and for years, Sanders existed on the fringes of the Democrat party until 2016.
However, a sinister group that calls itself the Transition Integrity Project which serves as an alliance between Democrats, Never Trump RINOs, neocons, and embittered members of the failed Hillary Clinton campaign have war-gamed a scenario that is exactly what Sanders is talking about.
According to the New York Times:
…conveniently, a group of former top government officials called the Transition Integrity Project actually gamed four possible scenarios, including one that doesn’t look that different from 2016: a big popular win for Mr. Biden, and a narrow electoral defeat, presumably reached after weeks of counting the votes in Pennsylvania. For their war game, they cast John Podesta, who was Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, in the role of Mr. Biden. They expected him, when the votes came in, to concede, just as Mrs. Clinton had. But Mr. Podesta, playing Mr. Biden, shocked the organizers by saying he felt his party wouldn’t let him concede. Alleging voter suppression, he persuaded the governors of Wisconsin and Michigan to send pro-Biden electors to the Electoral College. In that scenario, California, Oregon, and Washington then threatened to secede from the United States if Mr. Trump took office as planned. The House named Mr. Biden president; the Senate and White House stuck with Mr. Trump. At that point in the scenario, the nation stopped looking to the media for cues, and waited to see what the military would do.
Hillary herself gave credence to how far that they are prepared to go when she urged Biden to not concede under any circumstances.
Sanders who is the Vladimir I. Lenin of the American communist movement has managed to poison the minds of young people who have been seduced by the siren song of free stuff and racial vengeance but they are but a front for the same Deep State forces that orchestrate the regime change agenda abroad.
It is crystal clear that the Democrats and their intelligence community allies are not going to allow a legitimate election, take it from Bernie.
Notice: This article may contain commentary that reflects the author's opinion.