thelibertydaily--2020-01-26--California Democrats Introduce Bill to Protect Pedophiles Who Lure and Sexually Abuse Innocent Child

California Democrats Introduce Bill to Protect Pedophiles Who Lure and Sexually Abuse Innocent Children

( Natural News ) A handful of leftist politicians in California recently introduced a new bill that they claim will “ end blatant discrimination against LGBT young people regarding California ’ s sex offender registry.
” But the devil is in the details , as the bill would actually protect adult sex offenders who prey upon and assault minors .
State Senator Scott Wiener ( D-San Francisco ) and Assemblywoman Susan Eggman ( D-Stockton ) reportedly co-introduced the legislation , dubbed Senate Bill 145 , which would explicitly exempt sexual predators who are within 10 years of age of their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as sex offenders in the state ’ s official database .
As it currently stands in California , cases of illegal sexual intercourse between teenagers age 15 and over and others within 10 years of their age are treated on a case-by-case basis , and don ’ t necessarily require , in every case , that the older partners register as sex offenders .
But the same isn ’ t true for other illegal sexual acts between adults and minors , including sexual relations between homosexuals and children as well as transgenders and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a person convicted of certain offenses involving minors to seek discretionary relief from the duty to register if the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor , ” SB 145 states .
So , a 20-year-old homosexual can now get away with molesting a 10-year-old boy in California because prosecuting this adult offender would constitute “ blatant discrimination against LGBT young people ?
” Under the guise of trying to stop “ blatant discrimination against LGBT young people , ” the far-left politicians behind SB 145 are basically trying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , many of whom are obsessed with children and thus qualify as LGBTQPs – the P representing pedophilia .
Under SB 145 , a hypothetical scenario involving a 20-year-old homosexual who rapes a 10-year-old boy would potentially result in the courts deciding that the 20-year-old was simply “ expressing himself ” by taking advantage of an underage child .
Consequently , this 20-year-old pervert could potentially be let off the hook and not be required to register in the sex offender database – because having to do so might hurt his feelings .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ 145 , which is merely a cover for normalizing LGBTQP perversion in the name of combatting “ discrimination.
” It is somehow more important in 2020 to protect the feelings of LGBTQPs than the innocent children they routinely target with their sexual perversions .
“ It ’ s not ‘ discrimination ’ to arrest someone and charge [ him ] with sexually abusing a minor if in fact there is evidence of the crime , ” reports The National Sentinel , noting that “ all this legislation comes down to ” is pandering @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should be okay for adults to abuse kids , sexually , Period.
” “ It ’ s not discriminatory to make them register as sex offenders , regardless of their sexual orientation … Unless , of course , you ’ re a lunatic pervert yourself and a Democrat , ” this independent news outlet further contends .
Some of the biggest and most flagrant domestic terrorists in our country today are perverts like Senator Wiener , who on his state-run website is seen posing for photos with drag queens , many of whom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as California continues to drown in human urine and feces , suffer from an endless stream of illegal immigration , and burn to a crisp in out-of-control wildfires , the only thing its Democratic establishment is willing to do is pander to the Cult of LGBTQP with outrageous legislation that protects child predators while putting California ’ s children at risk of rape , molestation , or worse .
To keep up with the latest LGBTQP perversions being pushed not just in California but all across American society , be sure to check @ @ @

California Democrats introduce bill to protect pedophiles who lure and sexually abuse innocent children
A handful of leftist politicians in California recently introduced a new bill that they claim will "end blatant discrimination against LGBT young people regarding California's sex offender registry." But the devil is in the details, as the bill would actually protectsex offenders who prey upon and assault minors.
State Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Assemblywoman Susan Eggman (D-Stockton) reportedly co-introduced the legislation, dubbed Senate Bill 145, which would explicitly exempt sexual predators who are within 10 years of age of their minor victims from automatically having to register as sex offenders in the state's official database.
As it currently stands in California, cases of illegal sexual intercourse between teenagers age 15 and over and others within 10 years of their age are treated on a case-by-case basis, and don't necessarily require, in every case, that the older partners register as sex offenders. But the same isn't true for other illegal sexual acts between adults and minors, including sexual relations between homosexuals and children as well as transgenders and children.
"This bill would authorize a person convicted of certain offenses involving minors to seek discretionary relief from the duty to register if the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor," SB 145 states.
So, a 20-year-old homosexual can now get away with molesting a 10-year-old boy in California because prosecuting this adult offender would constitute "blatant discrimination against LGBT young people?"
Under the guise of trying to stop "blatant discrimination against LGBT young people," the far-left politicians behind SB 145 are basically trying to legalize child rape by LGBTQ perverts, many of whom are obsessed with children and thus qualify as LGBTQPs – the P representing pedophilia.
Under SB 145, a hypothetical scenario involving a 20-year-old homosexual who rapes a 10-year-old boy would potentially result in the courts deciding that the 20-year-old was simply "expressing himself" by taking advantage of an underage child. Consequently, this 20-year-old pervert could potentially be let off the hook and not be required to register in the sex offender database – because having to do so might hurt his feelings.
This is the disturbing essence of SB 145, which is merely a cover for normalizing LGBTQP perversion in the name of combatting "discrimination." It is somehow more important in 2020 to protect the feelings of LGBTQPs than the innocent children they routinely target with their sexual perversions.
"It's not 'discrimination' to arrest someone and charge [him] with sexually abusing a minor if in fact there is evidence of the crime," reports The National Sentinel, noting that "all this legislation comes down to" is pandering to LGBTQP perverts who "think it should be okay for adults to abuse kids, sexually, Period."
"It's not discriminatory to make them register as sex offenders, regardless of their sexual orientation ... Unless, of course, you're a lunatic pervert yourself and a Democrat," this independent news outlet further contends.
Some of the biggest and most flagrant domestic terrorists in our country today are perverts like Senator Wiener, who on his state-run website is seen posing for photos with drag queens, many of whom are also pervert child molesters.
Even as California continues to drown in human urine and feces, suffer from an endless stream of illegal immigration, and burn to a crisp in out-of-control wildfires, the only thing its Democratic establishment is willing to do is pander to the Cult of LGBTQP with outrageous legislation that protects child predators while putting California's children at risk of rape, molestation, or worse.
To keep up with the latest LGBTQP perversions being pushed not just in California but all across American society, be sure to check out Evil.news.
Sources for this article include:
TheNationalSentinel.com
NaturalNews.com


thelibertydaily--2020-01-26--Pharma Exec Gets a Mere 66 Months in Prison for Bribing Doctors to Overprescribe Deadly, Habit-Formi

Pharma Exec Gets a Mere 66 Months in Prison for Bribing Doctors to Overprescribe Deadly, Habit-Forming Opioids

( Natural News ) One of the worst drug epidemics in the history of America was caused not by small-time dealers and local pushers selling illegal substances on street corners , but by licensed physicians and primary care providers .
Opioids have killed as many or more people in the 2000s as crack and heroin did in the 1970s and 1980s , and in fact , the epidemic of death continues to this day — though the Trump administration is finally making some progress to combat it .
As The National Sentinel reported this month , after 30 years of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ numbers are finally falling for the first time .
In all , total drug overdoses from opioids have declined about 5 percent from a year ago , the first such decline since 1990 .
But there is much more to be done , of course , and that includes holding those who created this hellish nightmare responsible .
Alas , our warped system of justice — such as it is — may not be up to the task .
Millions of Americans who lived through the financial crisis probably recall that not a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was jailed in the aftermath , despite running organizations seemingly dedicated to perpetuating a criminal fraud on nearly every counter-party and client .
But when Americans look back at the opioid crisis , they ’ ll remember that at least one executive of a major opioid manufacturer and distributor was sentenced to a fairly weighty sentence – five-and-a-half years ( 66 months ) in federal prison – for an illegal kickback scheme that effectively involved bribing doctors to prescribe potentially lethal doses of fentanyl .
The company , Insys , packaged under brand @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was made from the same super-powerful synthetic opioid that has been responsible for tens of thousands of deaths across the United States .
And sorry to disagree , but 5 years in prison for Insys founder John Kapoor — he ’ ll be out in three , probably , if he lives that long — is not nearly enough for a man who is probably responsible for a hefty share of those OD deaths .
This is murder , nothing less According to reports , Kapoor was sentenced last week after being prosecuted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a racketeering law passed decades ago to give the Justice Department more legal authority to prosecute the Mafia .
Kapoor will join seven other Insys executives who ’ ve already received prison time for their role in the company ’ s illegal activities spreading deadly synthetic opioids to unsuspecting doctors and their patients .
Included in their scheme were “ ruthless ” sales tactics aimed at getting doctors to prescribe more and more of their drug .
That said , not all doctors were saints : Many took money in the form @ @ @ @ @ @ @ killing people .
They too , are now being prosecuted for their roles .
Some have already been sentenced to jail .
On Thursday , Alec Burlakoff , the company ’ s former sales manager and one of the government ’ s key cooperating witnesses , accepted a plea deal of 26 months in prison .
And while many of these sentences are light by our standards , at least pharmacy executives are being prosecuted .
That , in and of itself , is noteworthy , NewsTarget reported .
“ Under the company @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prescribed large quantities of the drug could earn up to $ 125,000 a year in speaking fees , ” the website reported .
In order to profit off of death , the company relied on what Kapoor called “ PHD ” sales associates — people who were “ poor , hungry , and desperate ” or , alternately , “ poor , hungry and dumb.
” According to documents prosecutors discovered in the course of their investigation , Kapoor methodically tracked profits .
Spreadsheets calculating ROI — return on investment — noted that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ every $ 1 a doctor received .
Meanwhile , the families of those who lost their loved ones to his dangerous drug are probably not happy with his sentence , either .

Pharma exec gets a mere 66 months in prison for bribing doctors to overprescribe deadly, habit-forming opioids
One of the worst drug epidemics in the history of America was caused not by small-time dealers and local pushers selling illegal substances on street corners, but by licensed physicians and primary care providers.
Opioids have killed as many or more people in the 2000s as crack and heroin did in the 1970s and 1980s, and in fact, the epidemic of death continues to this day — though the Trump administration is finally making some progress to combat it.
As The National Sentinel reported this month, after 30 years of escalating deaths from opioid overdoses, the numbers are finally falling for the first time. In all, total drug overdoses from opioids have declined about 5 percent from a year ago, the first such decline since 1990.
But there is much more to be done, of course, and that includes holding those who created this hellish nightmare responsible.
Alas, our warped system of justice — such as it is — may not be up to the task.
As Zero Hedge reported Friday:
Millions of Americans who lived through the financial crisis probably recall that not a single executive of a major investment bank was jailed in the aftermath, despite running organizations seemingly dedicated to perpetuating a criminal fraud on nearly every counter-party and client.
But when Americans look back at the opioid crisis, they'll remember that at least one executive of a major opioid manufacturer and distributor was sentenced to a fairly weighty sentence - five-and-a-half years (66 months) in federal prison - for an illegal kickback scheme that effectively involved bribing doctors to prescribe potentially lethal doses of fentanyl.
The company, Insys, packaged under brand name Subsys, sold a painkiller that was made from the same super-powerful synthetic opioid that has been responsible for tens of thousands of deaths across the United States.
And sorry to disagree, but 5 years in prison for Insys founder John Kapoor — he’ll be out in three, probably, if he lives that long — is not nearly enough for a man who is probably responsible for a hefty share of those OD deaths.
This is murder, nothing less
According to reports, Kapoor was sentenced last week after being prosecuted in the U.S. under the RICO Act, a racketeering law passed decades ago to give the Justice Department more legal authority to prosecute the Mafia.
Kapoor will join seven other Insys executives who’ve already received prison time for their role in the company’s illegal activities spreading deadly synthetic opioids to unsuspecting doctors and their patients.
Included in their scheme were “ruthless” sales tactics aimed at getting doctors to prescribe more and more of their drug.
That said, not all doctors were saints: Many took money in the form of kickbacks for overprescribing medications that were killing people. They too, are now being prosecuted for their roles. Some have already been sentenced to jail.
On Thursday, Alec Burlakoff, the company’s former sales manager and one of the government’s key cooperating witnesses, accepted a plea deal of 26 months in prison. And while many of these sentences are light by our standards, at least pharmacy executives are being prosecuted. That, in and of itself, is noteworthy, NewsTarget reported.
“Under the company's kick-back scheme, doctors who prescribed large quantities of the drug could earn up to $125,000 a year in speaking fees,” the website reported.
In order to profit off of death, the company relied on what Kapoor called “PHD” sales associates — people who were “poor, hungry, and desperate” or, alternately, “poor, hungry and dumb.”
According to documents prosecutors discovered in the course of their investigation, Kapoor methodically tracked profits. Spreadsheets calculating ROI — return on investment — noted that he wanted $2 in sales for every $1 a doctor received.
Meanwhile, the families of those who lost their loved ones to his dangerous drug are probably not happy with his sentence, either.
Sources include:
ZeroHedge.com
TheNationalSentinel.com
NewsTarget.com


thelibertydaily--2020-01-26--Vikings QB Kirk Cousins Issues Bible Challenge to Millions of NFL Fans

Star quarterback Kirk Cousins has announced that he has concluded reading through the entire Bible over the course of two years .
Tweeting about the incredible achievement , Cousins urged other followers of Jesus to set themselves the same challenge .
“ It took me over two years , but just finished reading through the entire Bible for the first time .
Def recommend it !
” Cousins wrote in a tweet that has been liked over 90,000 times .
Many responded to the tweet with words of encouragement and testimony .
“ The best book you can read , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ ve read it multiple times , and now I ’ m reading it with my wife .
God is good.
” FAITHWIRE : ‘ It ’ s a Glimpse at the Body of Christ in Action ’ : Tony Evans Reacts to Overwhelming Support for Daughter Pricilla Shirer “ Congratulations !
I have read through it a few times , ” another added .
“ Every time God shares something new to me that has helped me in life .
God is great all the time .
# FaithInGod ” Cousins is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ share his faith .
Following his team ’ s recent victory over Drew Brees and the New Orleans Saints , the Vikings star chose to give God all the glory in his post-game interview .
FAITHWIRE : The Christians Doing Battle in the NFC Championship Game “ My faith is important to me , it ’ s the foundation for my life , ” he said .
“ Ultimately , that ’ s where I gain my peace and strength .
Win or lose today , God ’ s still on the throne @ @ @ @ @ @ @ There are several Bible reading plans you can sign up to that will help guide you through the entirety of the scriptures .
One of the most popular is the “ Bible in One Year ” app , developed by Holy Trinity Church in London , England .
To find out more about BIOY and to get going with reading the whole Bible in a year , click here .
Good luck !

Star quarterback Kirk Cousins has announced that he has concluded reading through the entire Bible over the course of two years. Tweeting about the incredible achievement, Cousins urged other followers of Jesus to set themselves the same challenge.
It took me over two years, but just finished reading through the entire Bible for the first time. Def recommend it! pic.twitter.com/EjBqVWMZLZ — Kirk Cousins (@KirkCousins8) January 18, 2020
“It took me over two years, but just finished reading through the entire Bible for the first time. Def recommend it!” Cousins wrote in a tweet that has been liked over 90,000 times.
Many responded to the tweet with words of encouragement and testimony. “The best book you can read,” one person wrote. “I’ve read it multiple times, and now I’m reading it with my wife. God is good.”
FAITHWIRE: ‘It’s a Glimpse at the Body of Christ in Action’: Tony Evans Reacts to Overwhelming Support for Daughter Pricilla Shirer
“Congratulations! I have read through it a few times,” another added. “Every time God shares something new to me that has helped me in life. God is great all the time. #FaithInGod”
Cousins is no stranger to using his platform to share his faith. Following his team’s recent victory over Drew Brees and the New Orleans Saints, the Vikings star chose to give God all the glory in his post-game interview.
FAITHWIRE: The Christians Doing Battle in the NFC Championship Game
“My faith is important to me, it’s the foundation for my life,” he said. “Ultimately, that’s where I gain my peace and strength. Win or lose today, God’s still on the throne and I take comfort in that.”
There are several Bible reading plans you can sign up to that will help guide you through the entirety of the scriptures. One of the most popular is the “Bible in One Year” app, developed by Holy Trinity Church in London, England.
To find out more about BIOY and to get going with reading the whole Bible in a year, click here. Good luck!


thelibertydaily--2020-01-26--‘This President Has Done More for the Pro-Life Movement Than any President’: Former Press Secretary

‘This President Has Done More for the Pro-Life Movement Than any President’: Former Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders Praises Trump at Annual Save the Storks Gala

On Thursday night , the pro-life nonprofit organization , Save the Storks , threw their annual Save the Storks gala in Washington , D.C .
Many well-known pro-life activists were in attendance including NFL tight-end Benjamin Watson , Katrina Jackson , a pro-life democrat and Louisiana State Representative , former White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus , and key-note speaker Sarah Huckabee Sanders .
Huckabee-Sanders , who was the first mom to ever serve as the White House Press Secretary , explained how that position was one of the most challenging things in her life , as well as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Still no matter what , the greatest role and the greatest job I ’ ve ever had is that of being a mom , ” she pointed out in her keynote address .
“ So many times , people have asked me , ‘ Sarah how did you manage to be both a mom and working in the white house ? '
” The mother of three under the age of seven explained that in order to do this , she tried to include them as much as possible .
When she could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she did .
When she could bring them to the White House , she did .
Huckabee-Sanders shared a few stories about different times she brought her children to the White House and the comedic run-ins they had with the president .
“ I ’ m so proud of all the things this administration has done for the pro-life cause , ” she expressed .
“ You ’ ll never hear about it because the media won ’ t write it .
They don ’ t want to cover the good things because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s not fun to watch but it matters and it impacts every single one of us.
” “ Despite all of the adversity , all of the negative , and all of the nastiness , this president has done more for the pro-life movement than any president , or any administration in the history of this country , ” Huckabee-Sanders said , the audience applauding .
“ Tomorrow , the president will become the first president in the history of this country to go to the march for life , ” she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ while there are many challenges that the pro-life movement faces , there is confidence in the message .
“ The pro-life movement faces many challenges .
Many of you know , and a lot we ’ ve talked about tonight , ” she explained .
“ But I don ’ t think the movement has ever been stronger than it is right now.
” “ I don ’ t think there is any greater cause or message that brings people together than the cause of life , and its something that makes America @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we value life , ” she added .
“ We finally have a president who is also courageously standing up and protecting it , and doing everything he can to make sure every American remembers it.
” The former Press Secretary pointed out that despite the challenges that might arise , it ’ s important to remember that God is in control.
” “ But no matter what adversary we are facing , no matter what challenges are in our path , there is one thing we have to remember , it ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ power , it ’ s not the government that makes good decisions , it ’ s not the government that runs things , ultimately there is one thing that matters above all else , that God is in control.
” “ When we trust in Him , the other things come together very easily , ” she said , adding , “ This was reinforced for me every day that I worked in the White House.
” Huckabee-Sanders pointed out that just because God is in control , it doesn ’ t mean @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nothing .
“ Just because God is in control , it doesn ’ t mean we don ’ t have a part to play , she added .
“ That we don ’ t have a role in this great big world .
God is in control of it , but that doesn ’ t mean evil doesn ’ t exist in it .
She encouraged Christians to take responsibility and respond to the evils of the world , by standing up and fighting back .
“ Life is worth fighting for , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s what defines us as a culture and as a country and what makes us special .
Let ’ s go out tonight and be the somebodies that do something , ” she concluded .
Save the Storks is a pro-life nonprofit organization that works to empower women and show them that abortion is not the only choice they have .
They operate under the mission statement , “ we believe that together , abortion could be made unthinkable in our lifetime , ” and use advocacy and awareness , stork buses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supporting pregnancy centers to achieve that mission .
You can find more information on the Save the Storks organization on their website , or on their Facebook page .

On Thursday night, the pro-life nonprofit organization, Save the Storks, threw their annual Save the Storks gala in Washington, D.C.
Many well-known pro-life activists were in attendance including NFL tight-end Benjamin Watson, Katrina Jackson, a pro-life democrat and Louisiana
State Representative, former White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, and key-note speaker Sarah Huckabee Sanders.
Huckabee-Sanders, who was the first mom to ever serve as the White House Press Secretary, explained how that position was one of the most challenging things in her life, as well as one of the greatest honors.
“Still no matter what, the greatest role and the greatest job I’ve ever had is that of being a mom,” she pointed out in her keynote address.
“So many times, people have asked me, ‘Sarah how did you manage to be both a mom and working in the white house?'”
The mother of three under the age of seven explained that in order to do this, she tried to include them as much as possible. When she could bring them with her to events, she did. When she could bring them to the White House, she did.
Huckabee-Sanders shared a few stories about different times she brought her children to the White House and the comedic run-ins they had with the president.
“I’m so proud of all the things this administration has done for the pro-life cause,” she expressed. “You’ll never hear about it because the media won’t write it. They don’t want to cover the good things because that’s not entertaining, that’s not fun to watch but it matters and it impacts every single one of us.”
“Despite all of the adversity, all of the negative, and all of the nastiness, this president has done more for the pro-life movement than any president, or any administration in the history of this country,” Huckabee-Sanders said, the audience applauding.
“Tomorrow, the president will become the first president in the history of this country to go to the march for life,” she added.
Today @realDonaldTrump will be the first President to attend the March for Life. A proud day for the pro-life movement and every American fighting to protect the value and dignity of every human life. https://t.co/9UxfWE2iTY — Sarah Huckabee Sanders (@SarahHuckabee) January 24, 2020
She further pointed out that while there are many challenges that the pro-life movement faces, there is confidence in the message.
“The pro-life movement faces many challenges. Many of you know, and a lot we’ve talked about tonight,” she explained. “But I don’t think the movement has ever been stronger than it is right now.”
“I don’t think there is any greater cause or message that brings people together than the cause of life, and its something that makes America special, unique, and different because we value life,” she added. “
We finally have a president who is also courageously standing up and protecting it, and doing everything he can to make sure every American remembers it.”
The former Press Secretary pointed out that despite the challenges that might arise, it’s important to remember that God is in control.”
“But no matter what adversary we are facing, no matter what challenges are in our path, there is one thing we have to remember, it’s not the government that gives us power, it’s not the government that makes good decisions, it’s not the government that runs things, ultimately there is one thing that matters above all else, that God is in control.”
“When we trust in Him, the other things come together very easily,” she said, adding, “This was reinforced for me every day that I worked in the White House.”
Huckabee-Sanders pointed out that just because God is in control, it doesn’t mean Christians can just sit back and do nothing.
“Just because God is in control, it doesn’t mean we don’t have a part to play, she added. “That we don’t have a role in this great big world. God is in control of it, but that doesn’t mean evil doesn’t exist in it.
She encouraged Christians to take responsibility and respond to the evils of the world, by standing up and fighting back.
“Life is worth fighting for, it’s worth protecting, it’s what defines us as a culture and as a country and what makes us special. Let’s go out tonight and be the somebodies that do something,” she concluded.
Save the Storks is a pro-life nonprofit organization that works to empower women and show them that abortion is not the only choice they have. They operate under the mission statement, “we believe that together, abortion could be made unthinkable in our lifetime,” and use advocacy and awareness, stork buses, church engagement, as well as supporting pregnancy centers to achieve that mission.
You can find more information on the Save the Storks organization on their website, or on their Facebook page.


thelibertydaily--2020-01-26--Democrat Staffer on Impeachment Trial: ‘Nobody Cares’

More realization from Democrats that nobody cares about their impeachment trial .
Even Chuck Todd had to report it : @ @ @ @ @ all .
Here ’ s Magpies Haberman admitting the White House defense has been effective @ @ @ @ @ is all politics .
Now these are all cut by the GOP “ war room @ @ @ @ @ caveats here , they very swiftly cut them out of their clips .
But I @ @ @ @ @ the nose .
The people who hate Trump hate him even more and the people @ @ @ @ @ him even more .
And that ’ s about it .
Might as well pile @ @ @ @ @ yesterday showing that Trump ’ s approval rating actually went up , and his disapproval @ @ @ @

More realization from Democrats that nobody cares about their impeachment trial. Even Chuck Todd had to report it:
NBC’s Chuck Todd: Democrats are mourning voter “apathy” on impeachment, “nobody cares” pic.twitter.com/16cEzZBHWz — Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) January 26, 2020
LOL! Pathetic.
And that’s not all.
Here’s Magpies Haberman admitting the White House defense has been effective:
….and that the impeachment is all politics.
Now these are all cut by the GOP “war room” so if there are caveats here, they very swiftly cut them out of their clips. But I think this is generally on the nose. The people who hate Trump hate him even more and the people who love him now love him even more. And that’s about it.
Might as well pile on with this poll from yesterday showing that Trump’s approval rating actually went up, and his disapproval rating went dowwwwwn….


thelibertydaily--2020-01-27--A Tale of Two Planet Earths: Trump vs. Thunberg at Davos

In some ways , it hardly seems like a fair fight : the leader of the free world and the ultimate alpha male , Donald J. Trump , versus a slim , awkward 17-year-old Swedish schoolgirl , Greta Thunberg .
Even so , they both swaggered into the World Economic Forum in Davos , Switzerland with unassailable self-confidence .
Their messages , however , could not have been more distinct .
Thunberg delivered her usual tirade to the assembled business and political luminaries .
The “ world .
.
.
is currently on fire , ” she declared , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ panic ” because of the looming “ climate chaos.
” What ’ s more , the grandees of global capitalism , who had gathered to congratulate themselves for taking climate change so seriously , are , in fact , according to Thunberg , part of the problem .
Their much-ballyhooed targets for achieving “ net-zero ” carbon emissions by 2030 , or 2040 , or 2050 , are mere number-fiddling .
Only an immediate cessation in all fossil fuel investment would mollify Greta , and she isn ’ t holding her breath .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ children above all else , ” Thunberg intoned icily—strongly implying that the Davos elite loves money a great deal more .
President Trump struck a very different tone .
Instead of berating his listeners and scaring the wits out of them , Trump cataloged a long list of indicators in the United States that are pointing in a positive direction .
A 50 percent gain in the stock market since November 2016 and rising wealth for low-income families .
Rising wages , especially for those without college degrees .
Eight burdensome federal regulations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cleanest and healthiest air and water in decades .
Energy independence .
A quarter of all foreign direct investment is pouring into the United States .
Twelve-thousand new factories .
Millions of Americans are now liberated from food stamps and welfare .
And , just recently , two important new trade agreements were signed with China and our North American partners .
Trump , in short , painted a picture of a world in which living standards are rising , free enterprise is thriving , and technology is breaking through old boundaries and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sky ’ s the limit if one buys the Trumpian view .
These are the best of times , and they ’ re about to get even better .
What are we to make of these alternate realities , presented to the captains of industry , economic experts , and political opinion leaders gathered in the Swiss Alps ?
First , it ’ s worth observing that Trump ’ s version of Planet Earth , as opposed to the Earth-Hellscape that Thunberg inhabits , is rooted in reality .
The economic , environmental @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were , without exception , historically and statistically verifiable , even if they won ’ t make the evening news because , well , good news is no news at all .
People really are living “ longer , happier , healthier ” lives on a global scale , and standards of living have never been higher .
Natural causes of famine have been virtually abolished ( though political causes are another matter ) .
The upward trends also show no sign of dissipating , except insofar as they are self-inflicted wounds , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a toll in the West .
But humanity , in terms of its objective , material circumstances , has never had less reason to complain .
Trump also rightly points out the abysmal record that radical environmental activists—the “ perennial prophets of doom ” —have accumulated in terms of accurately predicting future environmental challenges .
They are constantly declaring that “ time is running out ” and only extreme , massively expensive , bureaucratic , anti-market reforms can save us .
How many times will the gullible swallow this bill of goods ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ any factual or scientific basis Thunberg ’ s remarks were .
Her appeals to mass hysteria invariably take the imminence of doom as a given .
Like so many environmental extremists , she posits a hypothetical global temperature increase of anything more than 1.5 degrees Celsius as the harbinger of the apocalypse .
Why ?
Presumably , because the old figure , 2 C , wasn ’ t approaching fast enough .
The 1.5 degree figure allows Thunberg and her allies to argue that we have only 12 , or 10 , or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) years left before—pow !
—the world will explode , or implode , or turn into molten lava , or something similarly bad .
In the meantime , credulous minds can be won over with brazen emotional manipulation ( why not weaponize the children ? )
combined with the cynical exploitation of every negative weather-related news story .
The goal ?
To create the impression that every time it rains , or doesn ’ t rain enough , or every time the sun shines , or doesn ’ t shine enough , “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us .
Even many committed climate activists balk at this armchair meteorological soothsaying , but no matter .
The truth is that because of humankind ’ s unprecedented prosperity and technological prowess , fewer and fewer people are suffering and dying at the mercy of the weather than ever before in history .
The only rational perspective on humanity ’ s relationship with our ever-changing climate , therefore , would be one infused with quiet satisfaction because of the tremendous progress already made—but don ’ t tell Greta Thunberg or her handlers , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ good news .
Donald Trump and Greta Thunberg came to Davos to promote two wildly divergent impressions of the state of the planet and its human denizens—one was positive , and one was negative ; one was affirming , and one was accusatory ; and one was true , while the other was a dark and sinister fantasy .
As usual , it was Donald Trump who summoned the courage to tell the world ’ s elite what much of it didn ’ t want to hear : that capitalism , freedom , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have brought us so very far , are still the answer to our problems and the path to a better world .

In some ways, it hardly seems like a fair fight: the leader of the free world and the ultimate alpha male, Donald J. Trump, versus a slim, awkward 17-year-old Swedish schoolgirl, Greta Thunberg. Even so, they both swaggered into the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland with unassailable self-confidence. Their messages, however, could not have been more distinct.
Thunberg delivered her usual tirade to the assembled business and political luminaries. The “world . . . is currently on fire,” she declared, and it is well beyond time to “panic” because of the looming “climate chaos.”
What’s more, the grandees of global capitalism, who had gathered to congratulate themselves for taking climate change so seriously, are, in fact, according to Thunberg, part of the problem. Their much-ballyhooed targets for achieving “net-zero” carbon emissions by 2030, or 2040, or 2050, are mere number-fiddling. Only an immediate cessation in all fossil fuel investment would mollify Greta, and she isn’t holding her breath.
“Act as if you loved your children above all else,” Thunberg intoned icily—strongly implying that the Davos elite loves money a great deal more.
President Trump struck a very different tone. Instead of berating his listeners and scaring the wits out of them, Trump cataloged a long list of indicators in the United States that are pointing in a positive direction. A 50 percent gain in the stock market since November 2016 and rising wealth for low-income families. Rising wages, especially for those without college degrees. Eight burdensome federal regulations scrapped for each one added. The cleanest and healthiest air and water in decades. Energy independence. A quarter of all foreign direct investment is pouring into the United States. Twelve-thousand new factories. Millions of Americans are now liberated from food stamps and welfare. And, just recently, two important new trade agreements were signed with China and our North American partners.
Trump, in short, painted a picture of a world in which living standards are rising, free enterprise is thriving, and technology is breaking through old boundaries and solving entrenched problems—including environmental ones. The sky’s the limit if one buys the Trumpian view. These are the best of times, and they’re about to get even better.
The truth is that because of humankind’s unprecedented prosperity and technological prowess, fewer and fewer people are suffering and dying at the mercy of the weather than ever before in history.
What are we to make of these alternate realities, presented to the captains of industry, economic experts, and political opinion leaders gathered in the Swiss Alps?
First, it’s worth observing that Trump’s version of Planet Earth, as opposed to the Earth-Hellscape that Thunberg inhabits, is rooted in reality. The economic, environmental, and technological gains that Trump cited were, without exception, historically and statistically verifiable, even if they won’t make the evening news because, well, good news is no news at all.
People really are living “longer, happier, healthier” lives on a global scale, and standards of living have never been higher. Natural causes of famine have been virtually abolished (though political causes are another matter). The upward trends also show no sign of dissipating, except insofar as they are self-inflicted wounds, like depression and drug addiction, taking a toll in the West. But humanity, in terms of its objective, material circumstances, has never had less reason to complain.
Trump also rightly points out the abysmal record that radical environmental activists—the “perennial prophets of doom”—have accumulated in terms of accurately predicting future environmental challenges. They are constantly declaring that “time is running out” and only extreme, massively expensive, bureaucratic, anti-market reforms can save us.
How many times will the gullible swallow this bill of goods?
It’s instructive how devoid of any factual or scientific basis Thunberg’s remarks were. Her appeals to mass hysteria invariably take the imminence of doom as a given. Like so many environmental extremists, she posits a hypothetical global temperature increase of anything more than 1.5 degrees Celsius as the harbinger of the apocalypse. Why? Presumably, because the old figure, 2 C, wasn’t approaching fast enough. The 1.5 degree figure allows Thunberg and her allies to argue that we have only 12, or 10, or eight (do I hear six?) years left before—pow!—the world will explode, or implode, or turn into molten lava, or something similarly bad.
In the meantime, credulous minds can be won over with brazen emotional manipulation (why not weaponize the children?) combined with the cynical exploitation of every negative weather-related news story. The goal? To create the impression that every time it rains, or doesn’t rain enough, or every time the sun shines, or doesn’t shine enough, “climate change” is coming to kill us. Even many committed climate activists balk at this armchair meteorological soothsaying, but no matter.
The truth is that because of humankind’s unprecedented prosperity and technological prowess, fewer and fewer people are suffering and dying at the mercy of the weather than ever before in history. The only rational perspective on humanity’s relationship with our ever-changing climate, therefore, would be one infused with quiet satisfaction because of the tremendous progress already made—but don’t tell Greta Thunberg or her handlers, who surely would be apoplectic at the good news.
Donald Trump and Greta Thunberg came to Davos to promote two wildly divergent impressions of the state of the planet and its human denizens—one was positive, and one was negative; one was affirming, and one was accusatory; and one was true, while the other was a dark and sinister fantasy.
As usual, it was Donald Trump who summoned the courage to tell the world’s elite what much of it didn’t want to hear: that capitalism, freedom, and good old Yankee ingenuity, which have brought us so very far, are still the answer to our problems and the path to a better world.


thelibertydaily--2020-01-27--Why Are Republicans Settling for Acquittal Instead of Total Victory?

It ’ s a shame that so many Republicans are calling for a quick impeachment trial and the inevitable acquittal of Donald Trump .
It seems more than a bit shortsighted .
Why should Republicans settle for an acquittal when we can accomplish so much more ?
The Democrats have laid a trap for themselves with this absurd impeachment farce and their demand for witnesses in the Senate trial .
Let ’ s oblige them in their efforts to destroy themselves .
The goal shouldn ’ t be simply to acquit Trump .
That ’ s a fairly low bar @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should be to crush the Democrats and make this entire process as painful and devastating as possible .
This is an opportunity of a generation to cause real pain for Democrats and administrative state actors—heck , even for their propagandists in the mainstream media .
Why let a good crisis go to waste ?
Why not take full advantage of the situation ?
People argue that Republicans shouldn ’ t give this impeachment trial credence because of the clearly partisan and hyperpolitical nature of it all , that it ’ s illegitimate and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it credibility .
Of course , that ’ s right—but we ’ re beyond that now .
Fact is , impeachment has happened and the trial is underway .
It ’ s a reality taking place right now , so to quibble about how we got here and how unconstitutional it all is , and how it is a farce is all true—and completely beside the point .
Now that we ’ re here , the question is how do we maximize the opportunity , because it absolutely is an opportunity .
Some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ six to eight weeks with witnesses is a good idea .
Can we trust Republican senators to not botch the process ?
This is a valid concern , but people forget that nearly two-dozen Republican senators are up for reelection in 2020 .
The impeachment trial concerns a Republican president who just happens to have a 95 percent approval rating within his party .
While most Republican senators are gutless wonders , one can rest assured that almost all of them are experts in self-preservation : to do anything to hurt Trump is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s base in a vital election year .
Add to the fact that Mitch McConnell ( R-Ky. ) wants to be the longest-serving majority leader , which means he needs to hold the majority through this year ’ s elections , and you have a scenario where there is a lot of self-interest at play here that works in Trump ’ s favor .
Of course calling witnesses will stretch out the trial .
Damn straight it will .
And it will bring utter chaos to the Democrat ’ s 2020 primary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in an election year drown out Trump ’ s massive list of accomplishments , from the economy to wages to trade deals ?
Not likely .
Trump has a somewhat powerful presence on Twitter and other platforms that allows him to shape and drive his own narratives .
His message will not be drowned out by a long trial ; between his social media presence and his massive rallies , he ’ ll do just fine .
But you know whose narratives will be drowned out ?
The Democrats ’ presidential wannabes .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ over them .
So let ’ s go for it .
After the House managers ’ performance , which amounted to just begging the Senate to call in Hunter Biden , let ’ s go even further .
Let ’ s call in every last witness they want with the understanding at the very onset that Republicans will be calling very specific witnesses , too .
Democrats want John Bolton .
Great !
Give them Mick Mulvaney , too .
Then Republicans can call in Hunter Biden , Eric Ciaramella , Michael Atkinson @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Schiff ( R-Calif. ) , who just happens to be a material witness .
Let Jay Sekulow and Pat Cipollone make mincemeat of Schiff and his clown crew while getting to cross-examine them under oath on national television .
It will allow Trump ’ s team to show the world what Democrats and administrative state actors have been up to the last few years with their soft coup attempts .
After what would likely be a very painful process for Democrats , then let ’ s have an acquittal vote exonerating the president @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump would hammer Democrats for the complete absurdity of it all .
If done correctly—and granted with Republican senators there are always massive “ ifs ” —a long , drawn-out , damaging trial for Democrats helps Republicans take back the House , keeps the Senate in Republican hands , fully exonerates Trump and helps him sail to re-election in 2020 .

It’s a shame that so many Republicans are calling for a quick impeachment trial and the inevitable acquittal of Donald Trump. It seems more than a bit shortsighted. Why should Republicans settle for an acquittal when we can accomplish so much more?
The Democrats have laid a trap for themselves with this absurd impeachment farce and their demand for witnesses in the Senate trial. Let’s oblige them in their efforts to destroy themselves. The goal shouldn’t be simply to acquit Trump. That’s a fairly low bar and virtually a given. The goal should be to crush the Democrats and make this entire process as painful and devastating as possible.
This is an opportunity of a generation to cause real pain for Democrats and administrative state actors—heck, even for their propagandists in the mainstream media. Why let a good crisis go to waste? Why not take full advantage of the situation?
Let Jay Sekulow and Pat Cipollone make mincemeat of Adam Schiff and his clown crew while getting to cross-examine them under oath on national television.
People argue that Republicans shouldn’t give this impeachment trial credence because of the clearly partisan and hyperpolitical nature of it all, that it’s illegitimate and to take it seriously is to give it credibility. Of course, that’s right—but we’re beyond that now.
Fact is, impeachment has happened and the trial is underway. It’s a reality taking place right now, so to quibble about how we got here and how unconstitutional it all is, and how it is a farce is all true—and completely beside the point. Now that we’re here, the question is how do we maximize the opportunity, because it absolutely is an opportunity.
Some question whether stretching out a trial for six to eight weeks with witnesses is a good idea. Can we trust Republican senators to not botch the process? This is a valid concern, but people forget that nearly two-dozen Republican senators are up for reelection in 2020.
The impeachment trial concerns a Republican president who just happens to have a 95 percent approval rating within his party. While most Republican senators are gutless wonders, one can rest assured that almost all of them are experts in self-preservation: to do anything to hurt Trump is to incur the wrath of the party’s base in a vital election year. Add to the fact that Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) wants to be the longest-serving majority leader, which means he needs to hold the majority through this year’s elections, and you have a scenario where there is a lot of self-interest at play here that works in Trump’s favor.
Of course calling witnesses will stretch out the trial. Damn straight it will. And it will bring utter chaos to the Democrat’s 2020 primary.
Would a long trial with witnesses in an election year drown out Trump’s massive list of accomplishments, from the economy to wages to trade deals? Not likely. Trump has a somewhat powerful presence on Twitter and other platforms that allows him to shape and drive his own narratives. His message will not be drowned out by a long trial; between his social media presence and his massive rallies, he’ll do just fine.
But you know whose narratives will be drowned out? The Democrats’ presidential wannabes. A long impeachment trial will step all over them.
So let’s go for it. After the House managers’ performance, which amounted to just begging the Senate to call in Hunter Biden, let’s go even further. Let’s call in every last witness they want with the understanding at the very onset that Republicans will be calling very specific witnesses, too.
Democrats want John Bolton. Great! Give them Mick Mulvaney, too. Then Republicans can call in Hunter Biden, Eric Ciaramella, Michael Atkinson, and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who just happens to be a material witness. Let Jay Sekulow and Pat Cipollone make mincemeat of Schiff and his clown crew while getting to cross-examine them under oath on national television. It will allow Trump’s team to show the world what Democrats and administrative state actors have been up to the last few years with their soft coup attempts.
After what would likely be a very painful process for Democrats, then let’s have an acquittal vote exonerating the president. Leading into the fall elections, Trump would hammer Democrats for the complete absurdity of it all.
If done correctly—and granted with Republican senators there are always massive “ifs”—a long, drawn-out, damaging trial for Democrats helps Republicans take back the House, keeps the Senate in Republican hands, fully exonerates Trump and helps him sail to re-election in 2020.


thelibertydaily--2020-01-27--The March for Life Proves that Cowering on ‘Social Issues’ Is Politically Stupid

This past weekend , along with an 800-person contingent from the University of Notre Dame , I marched in the 47th annual March for Life .
It was my second time at the event and truly an historic occasion .
I say this not simply because the march is the largest , regular demonstration in America ( and probably the world ) but because , for the first time , the president of the United States addressed the crowd in person—a crowd that was several hundred thousand strong .
President Trump spoke powerfully and to great applause about how “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ every human life—born and unborn—is made in the holy image of Almighty God.
” He declared his explicit support for the central claim of the pro-life movement , one rooted in our founding—in the Declaration of Independence , specifically—that every single person has the inalienable , God-given right to life .
Given the massive political debt the Republican Party owes to ordinary pro-life Americans—in the form of their precious votes , campaign contributions , myriad volunteer hours , grassroots mobilization and organization , and day-to-day rhetorical advocacy for nearly 50 years—one would think @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have seen significant movement on the question of abortion .
Public opinion is largely pro-life .
But abortion remains legal and is becoming ever more monstrous in its reach and application .
Why ?
Because , by all appearances , the swamp of “ conservative ” politicians , strategists , and think tanks—i.e.
, “ Conservatism , Inc. ” —would prefer to milk the issue in perpetuity so as not to lose support .
Think about it : If the issue disappears completely—if the Supreme Court , say , were to overturn its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conservatives might actually have to work for their daily bread ( quelle horreur ! )
.
Then how would these sort of Republicans—unable to offer their opportunistic , polished , but hollow pro-life rhetoric—fund their campaigns and win elections ?
They wouldn ’ t—and a GOP populated primarily by these kinds of hucksters would probably collapse .
Why doesn ’ t Conservatism , Inc. have the stomach or the spine to push hard on this issue , an issue central to the justice of the American project and hearts of the people they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only dust off pro-life talking points and gin up faux outrage come election season , never translating much of it into concrete political victories ?
Why have we only just now , in 2019 , graduated from legislating mandatory ( hours-long ) waiting periods to heartbeat bills and outright bans ?
Because movement conservatism is trapped in an elite ecosystem that is rabidly pro-abortion , and this has blunted their sense not only of what ’ s possible but of what ’ s right .
Their friends , neighbors , and colleagues in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to abortion as the summum bonum of liberty and ( economic ) life .
The prestigious universities they attended all teach bodily autonomy as a sacred doctrine .
And their fellow attendees at fancy D.C. cocktail parties are sure that abortion on demand and without apology is the moral , enlightened position .
This environment has neutered their ability to understand that the average American recoils in disgust at the horrendous procedure , one in which an innocent human being is always sacrificed for some lesser end .
They fail to recognize the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ country instinctively intuits that a monstrous injustice is wrought each time an abortion is committed—the horror of which is compounded by the mind-boggling reality that since 1973 , our nation has been the site of a consistent slaughter of the most innocent among us on a scale several orders of magnitude greater than the Holocaust .
Truly , what good is a roaring economy erected atop a mound of babies ’ corpses ?
Conservatism , Inc. has been so browbeaten by the constant , inane refrain of “ my body , my choice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do is act like they really want abortion gone .
Sadly , I submit that they don ’ t really , deep down in their gut , want that world to arrive .
But they ’ ll say whatever they need to say to fill their campaign bank accounts and cash their checks .
The most basic right is the right to life ; the very concept of “ rights ” is rendered nonsensical without it .
Life is the prerequisite for the exercise of any other rights—be they natural , political , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which is why he spoke at the March .
In his telling , the Democratic Party “ ha [ s ] embraced the most radical and extreme positions taken and seen in this country for years , and decades—and you can even say ‘ for centuries.
’ ” Awkward phrasing aside , he is indisputably correct on this point , and he offered a series of examples to illustrate the claim : “ Nearly every top Democrat in Congress now supports taxpayer-funded abortion , all the way up until the moment of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in New York cheered with delight upon the passage of legislation that would allow a baby to be ripped from the mother ’ s womb right up until delivery.
” “ The Governor [ of Virginia ] stated that he would execute a baby after birth.
” Finally , “ Senate Democrats even blocked legislation that would give medical care to babies who survive attempted abortions.
” The crowd vocalized its displeasure at being reminded of these ghoulish events with loud boos .
Conservatives need to stop letting progressives and the “ professionals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and are not acceptable positions for them to take and start “ fighting for those who have no voice.
” They need to get over their squeamishness about boldly tackling “ controversial ” social issues ; after all , the Left will oppose them tooth and nail no matter how hard they fight , so they may as well go all in .
They need to recognize their political duty to “ protect , cherish , and defend the dignity and sanctity of every human life ” and then stand with the “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and brave students who carry on the legacy of pioneers before us who fought to raise the conscience of our nation and uphold the rights of our citizens.
” If that isn ’ t a winning message , what is ?

This past weekend, along with an 800-person contingent from the University of Notre Dame, I marched in the 47th annual March for Life. It was my second time at the event and truly an historic occasion. I say this not simply because the march is the largest, regular demonstration in America (and probably the world) but because, for the first time, the president of the United States addressed the crowd in person—a crowd that was several hundred thousand strong.
President Trump spoke powerfully and to great applause about how “every human soul is divine, and every human life—born and unborn—is made in the holy image of Almighty God.” He declared his explicit support for the central claim of the pro-life movement, one rooted in our founding—in the Declaration of Independence, specifically—that every single person has the inalienable, God-given right to life.
Given the massive political debt the Republican Party owes to ordinary pro-life Americans—in the form of their precious votes, campaign contributions, myriad volunteer hours, grassroots mobilization and organization, and day-to-day rhetorical advocacy for nearly 50 years—one would think that, by now, we would have seen significant movement on the question of abortion. Public opinion is largely pro-life. But abortion remains legal and is becoming ever more monstrous in its reach and application. Why?
Because, by all appearances, the swamp of “conservative” politicians, strategists, and think tanks—i.e., “Conservatism, Inc.”—would prefer to milk the issue in perpetuity so as not to lose support.
Think about it: If the issue disappears completely—if the Supreme Court, say, were to overturn its 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade—so-called pro-life conservatives might actually have to work for their daily bread (quelle horreur!). Then how would these sort of Republicans—unable to offer their opportunistic, polished, but hollow pro-life rhetoric—fund their campaigns and win elections?
They wouldn’t—and a GOP populated primarily by these kinds of hucksters would probably collapse.
Why doesn’t Conservatism, Inc. have the stomach or the spine to push hard on this issue, an issue central to the justice of the American project and hearts of the people they claim to represent? Why do they only dust off pro-life talking points and gin up faux outrage come election season, never translating much of it into concrete political victories? Why have we only just now, in 2019, graduated from legislating mandatory (hours-long) waiting periods to heartbeat bills and outright bans?
Because movement conservatism is trapped in an elite ecosystem that is rabidly pro-abortion, and this has blunted their sense not only of what’s possible but of what’s right. Their friends, neighbors, and colleagues in all the wealthiest zip codes view access to abortion as the summum bonum of liberty and (economic) life. The prestigious universities they attended all teach bodily autonomy as a sacred doctrine. And their fellow attendees at fancy D.C. cocktail parties are sure that abortion on demand and without apology is the moral, enlightened position.
This environment has neutered their ability to understand that the average American recoils in disgust at the horrendous procedure, one in which an innocent human being is always sacrificed for some lesser end. They fail to recognize the vast majority of the rest of the country instinctively intuits that a monstrous injustice is wrought each time an abortion is committed—the horror of which is compounded by the mind-boggling reality that since 1973, our nation has been the site of a consistent slaughter of the most innocent among us on a scale several orders of magnitude greater than the Holocaust.
Truly, what good is a roaring economy erected atop a mound of babies’ corpses?
Conservatism, Inc. has been so browbeaten by the constant, inane refrain of “my body, my choice” that the best its members can do is act like they really want abortion gone. Sadly, I submit that they don’t really, deep down in their gut, want that world to arrive. But they’ll say whatever they need to say to fill their campaign bank accounts and cash their checks.
The most basic right is the right to life; the very concept of “rights” is rendered nonsensical without it. Life is the prerequisite for the exercise of any other rights—be they natural, political, or civil.
President Trump understands this, which is why he spoke at the March. In his telling, the Democratic Party “ha[s] embraced the most radical and extreme positions taken and seen in this country for years, and decades—and you can even say ‘for centuries.’” Awkward phrasing aside, he is indisputably correct on this point, and he offered a series of examples to illustrate the claim:
“Nearly every top Democrat in Congress now supports taxpayer-funded abortion, all the way up until the moment of birth.”
“Last year, lawmakers in New York cheered with delight upon the passage of legislation that would allow a baby to be ripped from the mother’s womb right up until delivery.”
“The Governor [of Virginia] stated that he would execute a baby after birth.”
Finally, “Senate Democrats even blocked legislation that would give medical care to babies who survive attempted abortions.”
The crowd vocalized its displeasure at being reminded of these ghoulish events with loud boos.
Conservatives need to stop letting progressives and the “professionals” gaslighted by them define what are and are not acceptable positions for them to take and start “fighting for those who have no voice.” They need to get over their squeamishness about boldly tackling “controversial” social issues; after all, the Left will oppose them tooth and nail no matter how hard they fight, so they may as well go all in. They need to recognize their political duty to “protect, cherish, and defend the dignity and sanctity of every human life” and then stand with the “strong women, amazing faith leaders, and brave students who carry on the legacy of pioneers before us who fought to raise the conscience of our nation and uphold the rights of our citizens.”
If that isn’t a winning message, what is?


thelibertydaily--2020-01-27--America-Hating Democrats Cannot Compete With This: Trump Campaign Hits Grand Slam in New Pro-America

America-Hating Democrats Cannot Compete With This: Trump Campaign Hits Grand Slam in New Pro-America Video: ‘The Forgotten Men and Women of Our Country Will be Forgotten No Longer’

“ For too long , a small group in our nation ’ s capital has reaped the rewards of government , while the people have borne the cost .
The Forgotten men and women of our country will be forgotten no longer.
” “ What truly matters , is not which party controls our government , but if our government is controlled by the people.
” How does the message in this video , one of energy and optimism , compare and contrast to the grim warnings and heckling we hear on the other side ?
Is this the sort @ @ @ @ @ @ @ A message that , to use the old cliché , ‘ moves and inspires ’ you ?
Here are some more of the quotes you can find inside : “ We will face challenges .
We will confront hardships , but we will get the job done.
” The Bumper sticker ‘ America First ’ is now taken beyond just a slogan and expressed as a quantifiable strategy : “ Every decision on trade , on taxes , on immigration , on foreign affairs will be made to benefit American workers and American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the ravages of other countries making our products , stealing our companies and destroying our jobs .
America will start winning again.
” What is the foundational principle ?
“ At the bedrock of our policies , will be a total allegiance to the United States of America .
And through our loyalty to our country , we will rediscover our loyalty to each other .
We must speak our minds openly , debate our disagreements honestly , but always pursue solidarity .
Do not allow anyone to tell you it can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ meet the heart and fight and spirit of America.
” Sounds like a soaring view of a great and unified people , stepping up to their full potential as a great nation in the world , doesn ’ t it ?
Sort of like a ‘ shining city on a hill ’ , isn ’ t it ?
Who was it that used to talk like that ?
And how did he do in his reelection bid ?
It ’ s not time to take our foot off the gas , by any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of things to come , let ’ s just say I like our chances .
What do you think ?
We ’ ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they ’ re entrusted with , they ’ re obviously unworthy of that trust .
But what about 2020 ?
Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact ?
Would Jesus himself vote for Trump ?
We ’ re glad you asked .
There ’ s a brand new book that covers precisely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ For Trump ?
” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani .
Would Jesus ever choose someone , with a less than stellar past , to be a leader ?
Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN , The Left , and his feckless ‘ compadres ’ on The Right ?
What about Health Care ?
Would the Great Physician give Trump ’ s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘ two thumbs up ?
’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER !
Get it HERE today .

“For too long, a small group in our nation’s capital has reaped the rewards of government, while the people have borne the cost. The Forgotten men and women of our country will be forgotten no longer.”
“What truly matters, is not which party controls our government, but if our government is controlled by the people.”
How does the message in this video, one of energy and optimism, compare and contrast to the grim warnings and heckling we hear on the other side?
Is this the sort of message that stirs your blood? A message that, to use the old cliché, ‘moves and inspires’ you?
Here are some more of the quotes you can find inside:
“We will face challenges. We will confront hardships, but we will get the job done.”
The Bumper sticker ‘America First’ is now taken beyond just a slogan and expressed as a quantifiable strategy:
“Every decision on trade, on taxes, on immigration, on foreign affairs will be made to benefit American workers and American families. We must protect our borders from the ravages of other countries making our products, stealing our companies and destroying our jobs. America will start winning again.”
What is the foundational principle?
“At the bedrock of our policies, will be a total allegiance to the United States of America. And through our loyalty to our country, we will rediscover our loyalty to each other.
We must speak our minds openly, debate our disagreements honestly, but always pursue solidarity. Do not allow anyone to tell you it cannot be done. No challenge can meet the heart and fight and spirit of America.”
Sounds like a soaring view of a great and unified people, stepping up to their full potential as a great nation in the world, doesn’t it?
Sort of like a ‘shining city on a hill’, isn’t it?
Who was it that used to talk like that? And how did he do in his reelection bid?
It’s not time to take our foot off the gas, by any means. But if this any indication of things to come, let’s just say I like our chances.
What do you think?
We’ve all seen the dishonest games the left have played with the power they’re entrusted with, they’re obviously unworthy of that trust.
But what about 2020? Could a moral person pull a lever for Trump with their integrity intact? Would Jesus himself vote for Trump? We’re glad you asked. There’s a brand new book that covers precisely that question:
“Would Jesus Vote For Trump?” by Doug Giles and Brandon Vallorani.
Would Jesus ever choose someone, with a less than stellar past, to be a leader? Would Jesus be cool with how Trump blasts CNN, The Left, and his feckless ‘compadres’ on The Right? What about Health Care? Would the Great Physician give Trump’s opposition to ObamaCare the ‘two thumbs up?’ Find out in this BEST-SELLER!
Get it HERE today.


thelibertydaily--2020-01-27--Report: Democrat Pervert Harvey Weinstein Kept a ‘Red Flag’ List of Accusers He Wanted Investigated

Click to email this to a friend ( Opens in new window ) Click to share on Twitter ( Opens in new window ) Click to share on Facebook ( Opens in new window ) Harvey Weinstein compiled a so-called “ red-flag ” list of accusers — including actresses Rose McGowan and Annabella Sciorra — whom he wanted investigated , according to testimony Friday .
Sam Anson , formerly a senior managing director at investigative firm Capital Solutions , said he was first contacted in August 2017 by the disgraced film impresario personally — who made his message clear .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , not happy , ” Anson told jurors about Weinstein ’ s 20-minute call , during which they discussed the torrent of sexual misconduct allegations appearing in the news against the filmmaker .
Weinstein himself then sent Anson an email with the “ red-flag ” list — including Sciorra ’ s name highlighted in red next to columns that described her as an actress in “ True Love ” and “ Cadillac Man ” and listed her phone number .
Other names on the list — which was displayed in court for jurors @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rape trial in Manhattan Supreme Court — were redacted .
Anson said he understood that Weinstein was concerned that people on the list might have been speaking to journalists about their sexual misconduct allegations .
“ He said he was concerned the articles were being written about him that would discuss his sexual conduct in a negative light , ” Anson said , adding that Weinstein alleged to him that “ a woman named Rose McGowan ” was trying to extort him .
Ultimately , Anson said , his firm never launched the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t say why .
“ We didn ’ t do anything , period .
We never received any instructions from Weinstein ’ s lawyers to do so , ” Anson said on cross-examination .
Weinstein is charged with sexually assaulting three women , including Sciorra .
He faces up to life in prison .

Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Harvey Weinstein compiled a so-called “red-flag” list of accusers — including actresses Rose McGowan and Annabella Sciorra — whom he wanted investigated, according to testimony Friday.
Sam Anson, formerly a senior managing director at investigative firm Capital Solutions, said he was first contacted in August 2017 by the disgraced film impresario personally — who made his message clear.
“He was somewhat agitated, distressed, not happy,” Anson told jurors about Weinstein’s 20-minute call, during which they discussed the torrent of sexual misconduct allegations appearing in the news against the filmmaker.
Weinstein himself then sent Anson an email with the “red-flag” list — including Sciorra’s name highlighted in red next to columns that described her as an actress in “True Love” and “Cadillac Man” and listed her phone number.
Other names on the list — which was displayed in court for jurors on Day 3 of Weinstein’s rape trial in Manhattan Supreme Court — were redacted.
Anson said he understood that Weinstein was concerned that people on the list might have been speaking to journalists about their sexual misconduct allegations.
“He said he was concerned the articles were being written about him that would discuss his sexual conduct in a negative light,” Anson said, adding that Weinstein alleged to him that “a woman named Rose McGowan” was trying to extort him.
Ultimately, Anson said, his firm never launched the probe Weinstein wanted, though he didn’t say why.
“We didn’t do anything, period. We never received any instructions from Weinstein’s lawyers to do so,” Anson said on cross-examination.
Weinstein is charged with sexually assaulting three women, including Sciorra. He faces up to life in prison.


thelibertydaily--2020-01-27--‘Winter Blues’ A Serious Disorder For 1 In 20 Americans

— We ’ re all too familiar with the gloominess that comes with the long winters , but as the temperatures drop , for some people , so does their mood .
Millions of Americans have been diagnosed with a seasonal form of depression that doctors say is more than just the winter blues .
Dr. Shannon O ’ Neill , a psychologist at Mount Sinai , says seasonal affective disorder ( SAD ) is a form of depression that has seasonal patterns for at least two years .
It ’ s also known as seasonal depression or winter depression @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and symptoms similar to depression , but the symptoms usually occur during the fall and winter months when there is less sunlight .
Their symptoms usually improve with the arrival of spring .
Symptoms include low energy , hypersomnia , overeating , weight gain , craving carbohydrates and social withdrawal .
For those experiencing symptoms , it can interfere with daily functioning and be distressing or overwhelming .
O ’ Neill says the disorder is linked to a biochemical imbalance in the brain prompted by shorter daylight hours and less sunlight in winter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a shift in their biological internal clock or circadian rhythm that can cause them to be out of step with their daily schedule .
About 5 % of adults in the United States experience SAD , and it ’ s more common for those living farther from the equator , where there are fewer daylight hours .
For example , only 1 % of people in Florida experience SAD while it affects 9 % of people in the New England area .
It typically starts when a person is between ages 18 to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ common among women than men .
It ’ s also common to those with family or personal history of depressive disorders .
There are some treatments that can help .
One such treatment is light therapy , where patients use a light therapy box that emits a bright light and filters out harmful UV rays .
The intensity of light is recorded in lux , which measures the amount of light received .
O ’ Neill says sitting with a 10,000-lux light therapy box 2 feet away from your face for 20-30 minutes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ body to promote wakefulness .
Those who use light therapy box treatment can experience symptom relief in 1-2 weeks .
Patients can also try behavioral strategies .
To increase exposure to sunlight , spend time outside and arrange your home or office so you are exposed to a window during the day .
Also , try to stay active and exercise regularly .
Additional treatments include taking SSRIs , antidepressants commonly used to treat SAD , and a vitamin D supplement , although the jury is still out on the effectiveness .

NEW YORK (CBSNewYork) -- We're all too familiar with the gloominess that comes with the long winters, but as the temperatures drop, for some people, so does their mood.
Millions of Americans have been diagnosed with a seasonal form of depression that doctors say is more than just the winter blues.
Dr. Shannon O'Neill, a psychologist at Mount Sinai, says seasonal affective disorder (SAD) is a form of depression that has seasonal patterns for at least two years. It's also known as seasonal depression or winter depression.
People with SAD experience mood changes and symptoms similar to depression, but the symptoms usually occur during the fall and winter months when there is less sunlight. Their symptoms usually improve with the arrival of spring.
Symptoms include low energy, hypersomnia, overeating, weight gain, craving carbohydrates and social withdrawal. For those experiencing symptoms, it can interfere with daily functioning and be distressing or overwhelming.
O'Neill says the disorder is linked to a biochemical imbalance in the brain prompted by shorter daylight hours and less sunlight in winter. As seasons change, people experience a shift in their biological internal clock or circadian rhythm that can cause them to be out of step with their daily schedule.
About 5% of adults in the United States experience SAD, and it's more common for those living farther from the equator, where there are fewer daylight hours. For example, only 1% of people in Florida experience SAD while it affects 9% of people in the New England area.
It typically starts when a person is between ages 18 to 30, and is four times more common among women than men. It's also common to those with family or personal history of depressive disorders.
There are some treatments that can help. One such treatment is light therapy, where patients use a light therapy box that emits a bright light and filters out harmful UV rays. The intensity of light is recorded in lux, which measures the amount of light received.
O'Neill says sitting with a 10,000-lux light therapy box 2 feet away from your face for 20-30 minutes a day in the morning encourages your body to promote wakefulness. Those who use light therapy box treatment can experience symptom relief in 1-2 weeks.
Patients can also try behavioral strategies. To increase exposure to sunlight, spend time outside and arrange your home or office so you are exposed to a window during the day. Also, try to stay active and exercise regularly.
Additional treatments include taking SSRIs, antidepressants commonly used to treat SAD, and a vitamin D supplement, although the jury is still out on the effectiveness.


thelibertydaily--2020-01-27--Remembering the Holocaust Amid Rising Democrat Anti-Semitism

Today , on International Holocaust Remembrance Day , the world remembers the 6 million European Jews murdered by the Nazis during World War II and renews its commitment to ensure the tragedies of the Holocaust are never repeated .
Sadly , on this 75th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp , we can not ignore the resurgent anti-Semitism in regions of Europe and North America .
A 2018 CNN survey revealed troubling trends relating to the public ’ s perception of Jews and the state of Holocaust education in Europe .
The survey found one in 20 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one in three said Jews were too influential in politics .
It should concern educators that Europeans are graduating from their schools with no knowledge of the genocide that occurred on their continent less than a century ago .
Europe ’ s short-term memory enables many Europeans to fall into the trap of believing old , prejudicial lies about the Jewish people .
This has real consequences for Jews .
Two violent anti-Semitic assaults took place in Berlin earlier this year , and a survey released this month by the American Jewish Committee @ @ @ @ @ @ @ say they have been victims of at least one anti-Semitic incident .
But anti-Semitism is not a solely European problem .
In December , attacks against the Jewish community surged in New York and New Jersey .
A fatal shooting at a kosher deli in Jersey City , a stabbing in the home of a rabbi during Hanukkah , and multiple attacks against Orthodox Jews in Brooklyn are just a few examples of resurgent anti-Semitism in America .
In response to these alarming trends , governments must protect their Jewish citizens , especially @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quickly bring to justice perpetrators of anti-Semitic attacks .
European countries that witnessed the Holocaust bear specific responsibility in this regard .
The French judicial system has been notorious for its failure to bring those who committed crimes against Jews to justice .
One French court released the murderer of a Jewish kindergarten teacher over claims he smoked marijuana before strangling her in her apartment and throwing her body over a balcony .
This heinous example should be the last of its kind .
In addition to extra security precautions at places of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the classroom .
Educators around the world must ensure that history curriculums accurately portray the Holocaust and explain how Nazi leadership spread disinformation and propaganda campaigns to stoke prejudice against the Jews in the years leading up to World War II .
At Yad Vashem , the World Holocaust Remembrance Center in Jerusalem , visitors pass under a stone archway where the words of Ezekiel 37:14a are engraved .
The passage says , “ I will put my breath into you , and you shall live again , and I will set you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jews , this passage of Scripture was fulfilled in 1948 when survivors of the Holocaust returned to their ancestral homeland and founded the modern state of Israel .
Seventy-two years later , Israel is a thriving democracy and stalwart ally of the United States .
America ’ s overwhelmingly bipartisan support for Israel ’ s right to exist has long sent a strong message to the rest of the world that the United States opposes anti-Semitism and is committed to religious freedom for all people .
President Donald Trump ’ s decision in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jerusalem was just the latest public gesture of America ’ s commitment to Israel .
Support for Israel ’ s right to exist as a Jewish state is an important aspect of combatting anti-Semitism , but the task of eradicating anti-Jewish prejudice is far from over , as evidenced by the recent rise in anti-Semitism in other parts of the world .
Publicly opposing the Boycott , Divestment , and Sanctions movement , condemning anti-Semitism whenever it surfaces , and standing with Israel are just a few ways to stand with the Jewish @ @ @ @ @ @ @ world leaders—including Prince Charles of England , Vice President Mike Pence , House Speaker Nancy Pelosi , and the presidents of Russia , France , Germany , Italy , and Ukraine—gathered in Jerusalem to commemorate today ’ s 75th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz .
At a solemn event held at Yad Vashem on Thursday , leaders remembered the Holocaust , paid tribute to survivors , and pledged to combat rising anti-Semitism .
In his address , Pence exhorted those gathered to “ confront and expose the vile tide of anti-Semitism that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the world.
” As the world observes International Holocaust Remembrance Day today , the vice president ’ s remarks are timely and remind us that , as we reflect on history and the recent rise of anti-Semitism , political leaders , advocates , and citizens everywhere still have much work to do to ensure that saying “ never again ” to the Holocaust truly means “ never again .
”

Today, on International Holocaust Remembrance Day, the world remembers the 6 million European Jews murdered by the Nazis during World War II and renews its commitment to ensure the tragedies of the Holocaust are never repeated.
Sadly, on this 75th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp, we cannot ignore the resurgent anti-Semitism in regions of Europe and North America.
A 2018 CNN survey revealed troubling trends relating to the public’s perception of Jews and the state of Holocaust education in Europe. The survey found one in 20 Europeans were unaware of the Holocaust and one in three said Jews were too influential in politics.
It should concern educators that Europeans are graduating from their schools with no knowledge of the genocide that occurred on their continent less than a century ago. Europe’s short-term memory enables many Europeans to fall into the trap of believing old, prejudicial lies about the Jewish people.
This has real consequences for Jews. Two violent anti-Semitic assaults took place in Berlin earlier this year, and a survey released this month by the American Jewish Committee found that 70% of French Jews say they have been victims of at least one anti-Semitic incident.
But anti-Semitism is not a solely European problem. In December, attacks against the Jewish community surged in New York and New Jersey. A fatal shooting at a kosher deli in Jersey City, a stabbing in the home of a rabbi during Hanukkah, and multiple attacks against Orthodox Jews in Brooklyn are just a few examples of resurgent anti-Semitism in America.
In response to these alarming trends, governments must protect their Jewish citizens, especially in their places of worship, and quickly bring to justice perpetrators of anti-Semitic attacks.
European countries that witnessed the Holocaust bear specific responsibility in this regard. The French judicial system has been notorious for its failure to bring those who committed crimes against Jews to justice. One French court released the murderer of a Jewish kindergarten teacher over claims he smoked marijuana before strangling her in her apartment and throwing her body over a balcony. This heinous example should be the last of its kind.
In addition to extra security precautions at places of worship, anti-Semitism must be fought in the classroom. Educators around the world must ensure that history curriculums accurately portray the Holocaust and explain how Nazi leadership spread disinformation and propaganda campaigns to stoke prejudice against the Jews in the years leading up to World War II.
At Yad Vashem, the World Holocaust Remembrance Center in Jerusalem, visitors pass under a stone archway where the words of Ezekiel 37:14a are engraved. The passage says, “I will put my breath into you, and you shall live again, and I will set you upon your own soil.”
For many Jews, this passage of Scripture was fulfilled in 1948 when survivors of the Holocaust returned to their ancestral homeland and founded the modern state of Israel. Seventy-two years later, Israel is a thriving democracy and stalwart ally of the United States. America’s overwhelmingly bipartisan support for Israel’s right to exist has long sent a strong message to the rest of the world that the United States opposes anti-Semitism and is committed to religious freedom for all people. President Donald Trump’s decision in 2018 to move the American Embassy to Jerusalem was just the latest public gesture of America’s commitment to Israel.
Support for Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state is an important aspect of combatting anti-Semitism, but the task of eradicating anti-Jewish prejudice is far from over, as evidenced by the recent rise in anti-Semitism in other parts of the world. Publicly opposing the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement, condemning anti-Semitism whenever it surfaces, and standing with Israel are just a few ways to stand with the Jewish people.
Last week, dozens of world leaders—including Prince Charles of England, Vice President Mike Pence, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and the presidents of Russia, France, Germany, Italy, and Ukraine—gathered in Jerusalem to commemorate today’s 75th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz.
At a solemn event held at Yad Vashem on Thursday, leaders remembered the Holocaust, paid tribute to survivors, and pledged to combat rising anti-Semitism. In his address, Pence exhorted those gathered to “confront and expose the vile tide of anti-Semitism that is fueling hate and violence all across the world.”
As the world observes International Holocaust Remembrance Day today, the vice president’s remarks are timely and remind us that, as we reflect on history and the recent rise of anti-Semitism, political leaders, advocates, and citizens everywhere still have much work to do to ensure that saying “never again” to the Holocaust truly means “never again.”


thelibertydaily--2020-01-27--Lee Harvey Oswald’s Final Uncashed Paycheck, Up for Auction

Lee Harvey Oswald -- the man some believe acted alone in assassinating President John F. Kennedy -- never cashed his final paycheck ... on account of being dead , we 're assuming .
Oswald 's check from the Texas School Book Depository is now up for auction ... and it 's likely to fetch a lot more money than what it was originally worth to him .
It was issued to Oswald on December 3 , 1963 -- 11 days after he killed JFK , and 9 days after he was shot and killed by Jack Ruby .
As you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than the stamped amount of `` $ 43 and 37 cts '' and includes a note at the bottom left that reads , `` 4 Days .
Lee Harvey Oswald for Nov '63 . ''
This implies he was paid for 4 days that week , but not a fifth day ... possibly Friday , November 22 , the date of the assassination .
Of course , Oswald was seen working at the book depository that morning ... before climbing into a 6th-floor window , and taking aim at Kennedy 's motorcade in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the possession of Marina Oswald 's lawyer , John Thorne .
He apparently paid Lee 's wife the cash in order to keep the check , which he obviously realized would become historic memorabilia .
When Thorne died , it was transferred to his widow ... who 's passed it along to Heritage Auctions to put it on the block .
We 're told it could haul in thousands , as it 's comparable to checks signed by John Wilkes Booth ... which can sell for up to $ 10k .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and will also include Oswald ’ s high school yearbook and a photo of him getting shot by Ruby .

Lee Harvey Oswald -- the man some believe acted alone in assassinating President John F. Kennedy -- never cashed his final paycheck ... on account of being dead, we're assuming.
Oswald's check from the Texas School Book Depository is now up for auction ... and it's likely to fetch a lot more money than what it was originally worth to him.
It was issued to Oswald on December 3, 1963 -- 11 days after he killed JFK, and 9 days after he was shot and killed by Jack Ruby.
As you can see, it's handwritten other than the stamped amount of "$43 and 37 cts" and includes a note at the bottom left that reads, "4 Days. Lee Harvey Oswald for Nov '63."
This implies he was paid for 4 days that week, but not a fifth day ... possibly Friday, November 22, the date of the assassination. Of course, Oswald was seen working at the book depository that morning ... before climbing into a 6th-floor window, and taking aim at Kennedy's motorcade in Daley Plaza.
Oswald fired 3 shots at 12:30 PM.
The check ended up in the possession of Marina Oswald's lawyer, John Thorne. He apparently paid Lee's wife the cash in order to keep the check, which he obviously realized would become historic memorabilia.
When Thorne died, it was transferred to his widow ... who's passed it along to Heritage Auctions to put it on the block. We're told it could haul in thousands, as it's comparable to checks signed by John Wilkes Booth ... which can sell for up to $10k.