thelibertydaily--2020-10-23--SHOCK Poll Says 46% of Black Voters Approve of President Trump

Rasmussen poll says 46 % of black voters approve of President Trump

A daily tracking poll of President Donald Trump's job approval released Friday showed an eye-popping surge in approval for Trump among black voters.
According to Rasmussen Reports, Trump's approval among black likely voters surged this week from 25% on Monday to 46% by the end of the week on Friday.
Rasmussen's daily tracking poll on Friday found that 51% of likely U.S. voters approve of President Trump's job performance while 48% disapprove.
To say that the Rasmussen poll stands in contrast to other polling on President Trump's job performance is a gross understatement.
According to the Real Clear Politics average of polls, Trump's job performance is an average 9.5 points underwater, 44.4% approve to 53.9% disapprove. Recent polls on Trump's approval other than Rasmussen have Trump at minus 9 points (Economist/YouGov), minus 16 points (Reuters/Ipsos), minus 14 points (Quinnipiac), and minus 12 points (Politico/Morning Consult).
It is highly unlikely that Trump's approval among black likely voters managed to increase 20 points in just five days, especially when no other polls show a similar trend.
But that is not to say Trump is definitively not performing better-than-expected among black voters.
The Trump campaign has made outreach to black voters a top priority headed into the U.S. election. President Trump often boasts that he's been the best president for black Americans in U.S. history, with the possible exemption of President Abraham Lincoln, who issued the Emancipation Proclamation ending slavery in the Confederate states and fought the Civil War. But aside from his rhetorical exaggerations, he has put forward serious policies specifically designed to reach out to and meet the wants of black Americans.
Last month, Trump gave a speech introducing the "Platinum Plan," a sweeping set of policy proposals calling for a $500 billion investment in black communities to create 3 million new jobs for black Americans. His plan aims to give black Americans greater access to capital for business development, expand school choice and education opportunities, and expand criminal justice reform among other policies.
At Thursday night's final presidential debate, Trump touted his record on criminal justice reform, funding historically black colleges, and creating economic opportunity zones. He accused Democratic nominee Joe Biden of being in government for 47 years and failing to achieve anything for the black community. Trump attacked Biden for sponsoring a crime bill in the 1990s that led to an increase of incarcerations of black Americans, questioning why Biden, if he now opposes the crime bill, didn't act on it when he occupied the White House with President Obama and had a Democratic-controlled Congress.
The messaging is clearly targeted at peeling away black support for Biden.
By no means does polling data indicate that these overtures to black Americans will help Trump win the black vote on Election Day. But one study reported by FiveThirtyEight did show that compared to 2016, Trump's support among young black voters (18 to 44) improved by 10 points.
Also, a study of black swing voters found that younger black voters don't want to be taken for granted by the Democratic Party and tend to have a more negative view of Democrats, and a more positive view of Republicans, than their older peers. Young black men, while they overwhelmingly say Trump is a racist, incompetent, and disagree with his policies, also admire how he "shows strength and defies the establishment."
Ultimately, the only poll that matters is the one on Election Day, when the American people will decide if Trump deserves four more years in office. Don't bet on 46% of black voters to swing for Trump.
But don't be surprised if Trump's support surprises.


thelibertydaily--2020-10-23--Listen to the Science: CNN Fake News Completely Dismisses Herd Immunity

On Wednesday afternoon ’ s CNN Newsroom , host Brianna Keilar collaborated with medical analyst and former Planned Parenthood president Leana Wen to attack one of the liberal media 's most hated targets in White House adviser Scott Atlas and discredit herd immunity .
Wen lied by claiming that herd immunity “ goes against the consensus of entire medical , scientific and public health community ” and Keilar proclaimed that “ it ’ s not a public health strategy.
” Keilar and Wen began the segment with some typical CNN fearmongering : KEILAR : It is not great to talk @ @ @ @ @ @ @ here because it is bad , there is really no way around that .
Give us the reality check on what to expect .
WEN : We are on the verge of exponential , explosive spread across the U.S. We know this because we 've been there before .
We 've seen what happens when you have rising numbers of infections , rising hospitalizations , and all this in a setting also of high levels of test positivity , which means that we 're not doing nearly enough testing and the real numbers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ higher than what 's currently reported .
The difference between what 's happening now versus before is that there are virus hot spots simmering all over the country .
And all of this is as we 're just in October .
We have n't even hit the worst of the winter yet when people have to be indoors when it gets really cold .
And we 're still arguing in the U.S. about whether we should be wearing masks when it 's something that 's such a basic intervention that can save lives @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the grim winter that 's ahead .
Keilar and Wen then launched into their attack on Atlas : KEILAR : It was notable that the U.S. surgeon general , Jerome Adams , today dismissed herd immunity as a public health strategy .
He said in a tweet , quote , this could overwhelm health care systems and lead to many complications , deaths .
So , I mean , clearly , he felt that it was necessary to say this out loud and to say this publicly .
Do you understand why ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ it 's because there is this disagreement within the Trump administration and we have people like Scott Atlas who has the President 's ear and is advocating for strategies like herd immunity , which , by the way , goes against the consensus of entire medical , scientific and public health community , because herd immunity is not a strategy .
It 's basically saying , we wash our hands , we give up .
Forget all the sacrifices that people have made along the way , we 're just going to let @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have stopped that from occurring in the first place .
I mean , I think it 's really tragic that we have to -- we continue to have to speak up and speak out against strategies like this that are n't strategies .
They are just a method for having preventable deaths in this country .
Wen flat out lied about the “ consensus ” about herd immunity .
Atlas himself is an esteemed scientist for one so his opinion certainly bares some weight .
Furthermore , the strategy is supported by esteemed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ well as other medical experts from Stanford , Harvard , and Oxford .
Furthermore , the strategy was proven as effective in Sweden , as cases and deaths have dropped dramatically there .
In fact , by September , Sweden averaged one COVD death per day .
Keilar gushed over Wen ’ s attack on Atlas and herd immunity by exclaiming that herd immunity is “ not a public health strategy , it 's a white flag.
” Wen finished by bashing Trump ’ s response to COVID : “ And to hear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do things differently when there are over 220,000 Americans who have died , I mean , that 's shocking , it 's unbelievable.
” A rather ironic statement coming from a former president of Planned Parenthood .
Is she as concerned about the hundreds of thousands of babies that Planned Parenthood murders every year ?
CNN is not a news network but a forum for advocating for radical authoritarianism over the American people .
This advocacy against freedom was sponsored by Amazon and Safelite .
Let them know here if you think they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ KEILAR : Well , let 's talk now with E.R .
Dr. Leana Wen , who is Baltimore 's former health commissioner .
Doctor , it ’ s great to see you .
It is not great to talk about the forecast that we 're seeing here because it is bad , there is really no way around that .
Give us the reality check on what to expect .
DR. LEANA WEN ( CNN MEDICAL ANALYST ) : We are on the verge of exponential , explosive spread across the U.S. We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ before .
We 've seen what happens when you have rising numbers of infections , rising hospitalizations , and all this in a setting also of high levels of test positivity , which means that we 're not doing nearly enough testing and the real numbers of infections is certainly to be much higher than what 's currently reported .
The difference between what 's happening now versus before is that there are virus hot spots simmering all over the country .
And all of this is as we 're just in October @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worst of the winter yet when people have to be indoors when it gets really cold .
And we 're still arguing in the U.S. about whether we should be wearing masks when it 's something that 's such a basic intervention that can save lives .
So I 'm really worried about the grim winter that 's ahead .
KEILAR : So we need to wear masks .
What else do we need to do ?
WEN : So there are simple interventions that we know by now can save lives .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ reduce the risk transmission by up to 80 percent .
We also have to avoid crowds , avoid these crowded gatherings , especially large crowded gatherings .
We have to keep our physical distancing , maintain at least six feet away from individuals who are not in our household , continue to wash our hands .
I mean , these are all the things that we 've been discussing for weeks , for months now , but they are as important as before .
And also really keep in mind that it 's @ @ @ @ @ @ @ friends that 's driving the surge .
So , as we 're coming into the holidays , be aware that we do n't want to be the ones who are hosting the next super-spreader event and inadvertently sicken our loved ones .
And so use an abundance of caution even with the people we love .
KEILAR : Very , very good advice .
It was notable that the U.S .
Surgeon General , Jerome Adams , today dismissed herd immunity as a public health strategy .
He said in a tweet , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and lead to many complications/deaths.
” So , I mean , clearly , he felt that it was necessary to say this out loud and to say this publicly .
Do you understand why ?
WEN : Well , it seems that it 's because there is this disagreement within the Trump administration and we have people like Scott Atlas who has the President 's ear and is advocating for strategies like herd immunity , which , by the way , goes against the consensus of the entire medical , scientific and public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not a strategy .
It 's basically saying , we wash our hands , we give up .
Forget all the sacrifices that people have made along the way .
We 're just going to let millions of people die when we could have stopped that from occurring in the first place .
I mean , I think it 's really tragic that we have to -- we continue to have to speak up and speak out against strategies like this that are n't strategies .
They are just a method for having @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : It 's not a public health strategy , it 's a white flag .
The President was asked if he ’ d do anything differently if he could redo his pandemic response and he said , quote , not much .
What is your reaction to that ?
WEN : I mean , that 's shocking , because I think all of us should be able to look back and say , we 've learned a lot along the way .
We did n't know in the beginning , for example , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and we missed opportunities .
We missed opportunities when it came to mask-wearing because we did n't know about the beginning about asymptomatic and aerosol spread .
We know all that now .
We know the importance of restrictions .
We know the importance also of having early action , of having consistent messaging .
All of these things we 've learned .
And to hear the President say that he would n't do things differently when there are over 220,000 Americans who have died , I mean , that 's shocking , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for all of us , we need to see this as a call to action for each individual , to take matters into our own hands .
If there 's failure on the level of the federal government , we need to each do our part , wear masks , practice social distancing , because it is really up to each of us to change the trajectory of the disease ahead .
KEILAR : Dr. Leana Wen , thank you so much .

On Wednesday afternoon’s CNN Newsroom, host Brianna Keilar collaborated with medical analyst and former Planned Parenthood president Leana Wen to attack one of the liberal media's most hated targets in White House adviser Scott Atlas and discredit herd immunity. Wen lied by claiming that herd immunity “goes against the consensus of entire medical, scientific and public health community” and Keilar proclaimed that “it’s not a public health strategy.”
Keilar and Wen began the segment with some typical CNN fearmongering:
KEILAR: It is not great to talk about the forecast that we're seeing here because it is bad, there is really no way around that. Give us the reality check on what to expect.
WEN: We are on the verge of exponential, explosive spread across the U.S. We know this because we've been there before. We've seen what happens when you have rising numbers of infections, rising hospitalizations, and all this in a setting also of high levels of test positivity, which means that we're not doing nearly enough testing and the real numbers of infections is certainly to be much higher than what's currently reported. The difference between what's happening now versus before is that there are virus hot spots simmering all over the country. And all of this is as we're just in October. We haven't even hit the worst of the winter yet when people have to be indoors when it gets really cold. And we're still arguing in the U.S. about whether we should be wearing masks when it's something that's such a basic intervention that can save lives. So I'm really worried about the grim winter that's ahead.
Keilar and Wen then launched into their attack on Atlas:
KEILAR: It was notable that the U.S. surgeon general, Jerome Adams, today dismissed herd immunity as a public health strategy. He said in a tweet, quote, this could overwhelm health care systems and lead to many complications, deaths. So, I mean, clearly, he felt that it was necessary to say this out loud and to say this publicly. Do you understand why? WEN: Well, it seems that it's because there is this disagreement within the Trump administration and we have people like Scott Atlas who has the President's ear and is advocating for strategies like herd immunity, which, by the way, goes against the consensus of entire medical, scientific and public health community, because herd immunity is not a strategy. It's basically saying, we wash our hands, we give up. Forget all the sacrifices that people have made along the way, we're just going to let millions of people die when we could have stopped that from occurring in the first place. I mean, I think it's really tragic that we have to -- we continue to have to speak up and speak out against strategies like this that aren't strategies. They are just a method for having preventable deaths in this country.
Wen flat out lied about the “consensus” about herd immunity. Atlas himself is an esteemed scientist for one so his opinion certainly bares some weight. Furthermore, the strategy is supported by esteemed Harvard professor of medicine Martin Kulldorff as well as other medical experts from Stanford, Harvard, and Oxford. Furthermore, the strategy was proven as effective in Sweden, as cases and deaths have dropped dramatically there. In fact, by September, Sweden averaged one COVD death per day.
Keilar gushed over Wen’s attack on Atlas and herd immunity by exclaiming that herd immunity is “not a public health strategy, it's a white flag.”
Wen finished by bashing Trump’s response to COVID: “And to hear the President say that he wouldn't do things differently when there are over 220,000 Americans who have died, I mean, that's shocking, it's unbelievable.”
A rather ironic statement coming from a former president of Planned Parenthood. Is she as concerned about the hundreds of thousands of babies that Planned Parenthood murders every year?
CNN is not a news network but a forum for advocating for radical authoritarianism over the American people.
This advocacy against freedom was sponsored by Amazon and Safelite. Let them know here if you think they should be sponsoring this content.
Read the full October 21st transcript here:


thelibertydaily--2020-10-24--Don’t Believe the Lies; Democrat Joe Biden Plans to Destroy Every Fracking, Oil, and Coal Job in Ame

Don’t Believe the Lies; Democrat Joe Biden Plans to Destroy Every Fracking, Oil, and Coal Job in America

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has spent the better part of the past month Skyping across America—because , you know , it ’ s much too dangerous for Joe to actually leave his basement—telling everyone who will listen that he pinky swears that a Biden-Harris administration would not “ ban ” fracking .
It ’ s all a “ lie , ” Biden says , cooked up by President Trump and his allies to ruin Biden ’ s chances in key swing states where fracking plays an important role in the economy , especially Pennsylvania .
Even Biden ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to come to Joe ’ s defense .
During the vice presidential debate earlier in October , Harris told Americans , “ Joe Biden will not ban fracking .
That is a fact.
” Actually , Sen. Harris , it is absolutely not a “ fact.
” It ’ s a political promise , and an incredibly misleading one at that .
Despite his constant pleas to the contrary , the available evidence strongly suggests Joe Biden would put policies into place that would result in the complete destruction of virtually all jobs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ States , including the fracking jobs 32,000 Pennsylvania families are currently depending on to pay their bills , and the thousands of other jobs in the state associated with the natural gas and oil industries .
What ’ s the proof ?
Well , for starters , Biden has on numerous occasions promised voters on the campaign trail he will put America on the road to the elimination of fossil fuels .
( If fossil fuel use is banned , then fracking would be totally unnecessary . )
For example , at a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , he told one young girl , “ I want you to look at my eyes .
I guarantee you , I guarantee you we ’ re going to end fossil fuel … ” During the presidential debate on Thursday , Biden admitted he would impose a “ transition from the oil industry.
” “ Would he close down the oil industry ?
” Trump asked .
“ Would you close down the oil industry ?
” “ I would transition from the oil industry , yes , ” Biden said .
( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ end , ” “ dismantle , ” and “ decimate.
” ) Further , Biden ’ s own campaign website claims , “ As president , Biden will lead the world to address the climate emergency and lead through the power of example , by ensuring the U.S. achieves a 100 % clean energy economy and net-zero emissions no later than 2050.
” Biden ’ s website further promises , “ On day one , Biden will sign a series of new executive orders with unprecedented reach that go well beyond the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the right track .
And , he will demand that Congress enacts legislation in the first year of his presidency that : 1 ) establishes an enforcement mechanism that includes milestone targets no later than the end of his first term in 2025 … ” Imposing an “ enforcement mechanism that includes milestone targets ” to push the entire country toward a “ 100 % clean-energy economy ” would require the end of nearly all fossil fuel use—and , again , that includes the natural gas and oil that comes from fracking .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ radicals who have for years called for truly radical alterations to the U.S. energy industry and American society .
Kamala Harris , for instance , co-sponsored—not merely supported—Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ’ s Green New Deal , and not some watered-down version of it , either .
I ’ m talking about the cow-killing , end-of-air-travel , socialist version of the Green New Deal .
Biden also allowed Ocasio-Cortez , John Kerry , and the leader of the eco-socialist Sunrise Movement to help Biden shape his policy platforms as members of the Biden-Bernie Sanders “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and the Sunrise Movement , along with other Unity Task Force members , have demanded the end of fossil fuel use around the world—not just the United States—because they believe the carbon dioxide emissions produced by the burning of fossil fuels are creating an “ existential threat ” to the entire human race .
If Joe Biden is such a big supporter of fracking , why would he permit so many people who loathe fracking and all fossil fuel production to help write his climate and energy platforms ?
And how , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the fracking industry alive while simultaneously putting policies in place meant to end the use of oil and natural gas ?
The only answer that makes even a shred of sense came from Biden at the presidential debate on Thursday , when Biden said he would “ make sure that we can capture the emissions from the fracking , capture the emissions from gas.
” Or , put another way , Biden is saying some fracking might be allowed to continue , so long as carbon-capture technology is used to suck up all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s only one problem with this part of Biden ’ s plan—and it ’ s a doozy—the cost of carbon-capture technology is so high , and has been for its entire existence , that it would make all fossil fuel use completely unmarketable compared to other kinds of energy production .
So , is Biden planning to “ ban ” fossil fuels ?
In some cases , yes , and in other cases , he ’ s just planning on making them so expensive to use that no one ever will .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the result is just the same as a ban .
In Joe Biden ’ s America , every oil , natural gas , fracking , and coal job will , sooner or later , be eliminated—directly or indirectly—by the federal government .
If Biden has it his way , millions—not hundreds or thousands—of jobs will be destroyed .
It ’ s true that some of these jobs will be replaced by gigantic new government programs and subsidies meant to encourage the expansion of the wind and solar industries , but there is absolutely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in industries related to existing conventional energy sources will find work in a wind or solar facility .
The truth is , countless Americans won ’ t .
Many people ’ s lives will be ruined .
Perhaps even more importantly , because scaled-up wind and solar costs much more and is much less reliable than existing conventional energy , hundreds of thousands—maybe even millions—of additional jobs will be destroyed , never allowed to come to fruition , or shipped overseas to places with lower energy costs .
According to the Center of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the electric grid were reliant on wind , solar , or battery storage , it would force Americans to spend more than $ 1.4 trillion in additional electricity costs every single year .
With these costs in mind , it is clear many U.S. businesses , especially energy-intensive ones like those in the manufacturing sector , simply would not survive under Biden ’ s model .
Joe Biden ’ s climate and energy plans would devastate America and put the country on the road to economic catastrophe .
Hopefully , more Americans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it ’ s too late .
PHOTO : Vice President Joe Biden holds an event with voters in the gymnasium at McKinley Elementary School in Des Moines , where he addressed a number of issues including the recent escalation with Iran .
Photo by Phil Roeder .
Attribution 2.0 Generic ( CC BY 2.0 )

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has spent the better part of the past month Skyping across America—because, you know, it’s much too dangerous for Joe to actually leave his basement—telling everyone who will listen that he pinky swears that a Biden-Harris administration would not “ban” fracking.
It’s all a “lie,” Biden says, cooked up by President Trump and his allies to ruin Biden’s chances in key swing states where fracking plays an important role in the economy, especially Pennsylvania.
Even Biden’s running mate—a notorious hater of fracking—has attempted to come to Joe’s defense. During the vice presidential debate earlier in October, Harris told Americans, “Joe Biden will not ban fracking. That is a fact.”
Actually, Sen. Harris, it is absolutely not a “fact.” It’s a political promise, and an incredibly misleading one at that.
Despite his constant pleas to the contrary, the available evidence strongly suggests Joe Biden would put policies into place that would result in the complete destruction of virtually all jobs related to fossil-fuel production in the United States, including the fracking jobs 32,000 Pennsylvania families are currently depending on to pay their bills, and the thousands of other jobs in the state associated with the natural gas and oil industries.
What’s the proof? Well, for starters, Biden has on numerous occasions promised voters on the campaign trail he will put America on the road to the elimination of fossil fuels. (If fossil fuel use is banned, then fracking would be totally unnecessary.)
For example, at a September 2019 campaign event in New Hampshire, he told one young girl, “I want you to look at my eyes. I guarantee you, I guarantee you we’re going to end fossil fuel …”
During the presidential debate on Thursday, Biden admitted he would impose a “transition from the oil industry.”
“Would he close down the oil industry?” Trump asked. “Would you close down the oil industry?”
“I would transition from the oil industry, yes,” Biden said. (“Transition” is political speak for “end,” “dismantle,” and “decimate.”)
Further, Biden’s own campaign website claims, “As president, Biden will lead the world to address the climate emergency and lead through the power of example, by ensuring the U.S. achieves a 100% clean energy economy and net-zero emissions no later than 2050.”
Biden’s website further promises, “On day one, Biden will sign a series of new executive orders with unprecedented reach that go well beyond the Obama-Biden Administration platform and put us on the right track. And, he will demand that Congress enacts legislation in the first year of his presidency that: 1) establishes an enforcement mechanism that includes milestone targets no later than the end of his first term in 2025 …”
Imposing an “enforcement mechanism that includes milestone targets” to push the entire country toward a “100% clean-energy economy” would require the end of nearly all fossil fuel use—and, again, that includes the natural gas and oil that comes from fracking.
Biden has also surrounded himself with environmental radicals who have for years called for truly radical alterations to the U.S. energy industry and American society.
Kamala Harris, for instance, co-sponsored—not merely supported—Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal, and not some watered-down version of it, either. I’m talking about the cow-killing, end-of-air-travel, socialist version of the Green New Deal.
Biden also allowed Ocasio-Cortez, John Kerry, and the leader of the eco-socialist Sunrise Movement to help Biden shape his policy platforms as members of the Biden-Bernie Sanders “Unity Task Forces.”
AOC, Kerry, and the Sunrise Movement, along with other Unity Task Force members, have demanded the end of fossil fuel use around the world—not just the United States—because they believe the carbon dioxide emissions produced by the burning of fossil fuels are creating an “existential threat” to the entire human race.
If Joe Biden is such a big supporter of fracking, why would he permit so many people who loathe fracking and all fossil fuel production to help write his climate and energy platforms? And how, exactly, does Biden plan to keep the fracking industry alive while simultaneously putting policies in place meant to end the use of oil and natural gas?
The only answer that makes even a shred of sense came from Biden at the presidential debate on Thursday, when Biden said he would “make sure that we can capture the emissions from the fracking, capture the emissions from gas.”
Or, put another way, Biden is saying some fracking might be allowed to continue, so long as carbon-capture technology is used to suck up all of the carbon dioxide emissions.
There’s only one problem with this part of Biden’s plan—and it’s a doozy—the cost of carbon-capture technology is so high, and has been for its entire existence, that it would make all fossil fuel use completely unmarketable compared to other kinds of energy production.
So, is Biden planning to “ban” fossil fuels? In some cases, yes, and in other cases, he’s just planning on making them so expensive to use that no one ever will. At the end of the day, the result is just the same as a ban. In Joe Biden’s America, every oil, natural gas, fracking, and coal job will, sooner or later, be eliminated—directly or indirectly—by the federal government.
If Biden has it his way, millions—not hundreds or thousands—of jobs will be destroyed.
It’s true that some of these jobs will be replaced by gigantic new government programs and subsidies meant to encourage the expansion of the wind and solar industries, but there is absolutely no way Biden can ensure that everyone in industries related to existing conventional energy sources will find work in a wind or solar facility.
The truth is, countless Americans won’t. Many people’s lives will be ruined.
Perhaps even more importantly, because scaled-up wind and solar costs much more and is much less reliable than existing conventional energy, hundreds of thousands—maybe even millions—of additional jobs will be destroyed, never allowed to come to fruition, or shipped overseas to places with lower energy costs.
According to the Center of the American Experiment, if 80 percent of the electric grid were reliant on wind, solar, or battery storage, it would force Americans to spend more than $1.4 trillion in additional electricity costs every single year.
With these costs in mind, it is clear many U.S. businesses, especially energy-intensive ones like those in the manufacturing sector, simply would not survive under Biden’s model.
Joe Biden’s climate and energy plans would devastate America and put the country on the road to economic catastrophe. Hopefully, more Americans will wake up to this reality before it’s too late.
PHOTO: Vice President Joe Biden holds an event with voters in the gymnasium at McKinley Elementary School in Des Moines, where he addressed a number of issues including the recent escalation with Iran. Photo by Phil Roeder. Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0)


thelibertydaily--2020-10-24--Nutty Nancy Pelosi, Famous Theologian, Has Thoughts About ‘God’s Will’ For America . . . And Oil

Nancy Pelosi has been called a lot of things , but ‘ Messenger of God ’ is not one of them .
Most of the things she ’ s called are unprintable , and ought not be spoken in polite company , because she ’ s known more for opportunistic and cynical plays for political power than she ever has for virtue , decency , or wisdom .
Her routine use of lies to defame anyone who stands between her and her political objectives is a violation of ‘ bearing false witness ’ .
But she ’ s all-in on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of eliminating the use of oil .
The fact that she ’ s even TALKING about this is because her boy Joe crapped the bed in the debate with Trump by saying that he wants to transition away from oil .
Since a lot of swing states have oil-dependent economies , this statement by itself ( as Trump noticed in saying ‘ that ’ s a big statement ’ ) could be enough to deep-six Democrat chances in some key voting districts .
Trending : LIE OF THE NIGHT : Biden Says No @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( VIDEO ) It could conceivably cost them any hope of taking back the White House altogether .
So Pelosi ’ s on the TV circuit trying to clean up his mess .
What are their favorite cards to play ?
The same ones they always play when they are trying to get people to do something that is against their interests — invoke fear and moral finger-wagging .
Forget the fact that even the authors of the Green New Deal admitted that it was more about an attempt at wealth transfer and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some untested utopia in its place .
Pelosi assures us that her way is the only moral path .
And if you dare disagree with her , you oppose both God and Science .
( How convenient . )
In the midst lot of other unproven and disproven bafflegab about the security dangers of having the wrong view on climate issues , she wraps herself in the Mantle of Moses or the Apostles .
This was , remember , a tv segment in which she was defending Joe Biden ’ s position on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Story here : Not Just FRACKING Anymore — Biden Just Threw OIL Under The Bus Time stamp 2:27 for the bit when she shifts into sermonizing : For someone so concerned about ‘ security ’ she was decidedly disinterested in Joe ’ s troubles with allegations about payoffs from the Chinese Communist Party .
America — which is not abiding by Paris Treaty — has ( since Trump scuttled it ) has lowered its carbon production MORE than all of Europe combined .
If you really wanted to transition away from fossil fuel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ best shot at reliable energy sources that do NOT contribute to the much-ballyhooed warming : Generation IV nuclear power .
So many aspects of our economy are fossil fuel dependent .
The manufacturing of steel , for instance , requires coal .
Synthetic materials , including the ones we use in our PPE , are fossil fuel based .
So is everything we import from places like China .
If you REALLY wanted to deal with the environmental issue you claim to care about , you would incentivize repatriation of manufacturing to America @ @ @ @ @ @ @ environmental regulations .
Biden and his Democrats haven ’ t a clue how to do that .
Remember that ‘ magic wand ’ question they taunted Trump with ?
What we DO know is that their taxes and regulations will chase all that manufacturing right back to foreign shores where they neither operate under our environmental standards , nor do they fund an environmentally-conscious culture and nation .
It isn ’ t AMERICAN rivers that are the chief offenders filled with plastic headed for the Oceans .
She forgets that developing nations building @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nations out of poverty .
Didn ’ t morality and decency used to include caring about THAT ?
Let nobody tell you that the second decade of the 21st century has been a bad time .
We are living through the greatest improvement in human living standards in history .
Extreme poverty has fallen below 10 percent of the world ’ s population for the first time .
It was 60 percent when I was born .
Global inequality has been plunging as Africa and Asia experience faster economic growth than Europe and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to record low levels ; famine virtually went extinct ; malaria , polio and heart disease are all in decline .
— Cancel The Apocalypse Party : This Was The BEST Decade In Human History — Here ’ s Why Spin Joe ’ s gaffes all you want , Nancy .
We ’ re not buying it .

Nancy Pelosi has been called a lot of things, but ‘Messenger of God’ is not one of them.
Most of the things she’s called are unprintable, and ought not be spoken in polite company, because she’s known more for opportunistic and cynical plays for political power than she ever has for virtue, decency, or wisdom.
Her routine use of lies to defame anyone who stands between her and her political objectives is a violation of ‘bearing false witness’. But she’s all-in on the moral imperative she believes we have of eliminating the use of oil.
The fact that she’s even TALKING about this is because her boy Joe crapped the bed in the debate with Trump by saying that he wants to transition away from oil. Since a lot of swing states have oil-dependent economies, this statement by itself (as Trump noticed in saying ‘that’s a big statement’) could be enough to deep-six Democrat chances in some key voting districts.
It could conceivably cost them any hope of taking back the White House altogether.
So Pelosi’s on the TV circuit trying to clean up his mess.
What are their favorite cards to play? The same ones they always play when they are trying to get people to do something that is against their interests — invoke fear and moral finger-wagging.
Forget the fact that even the authors of the Green New Deal admitted that it was more about an attempt at wealth transfer and ripping down the old economy to put some untested utopia in its place.
Chakrabarti let the cat out of the bag in a recent extensive profile in The Post magazine. According to the report, Chakrabarti told an aide for Washington Gov. Jay Inslee (D), a presidential candidate, that his boss’s Green New Deal “wasn’t originally a climate thing at all.” “Do you guys think of it as a climate thing?” Chakrabarti says, “Because we really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing.” You can’t get much more revolutionary than that. —Read more
Pelosi assures us that her way is the only moral path. And if you dare disagree with her, you oppose both God and Science. (How convenient.)
Pelosi suggests it's God's will to end the U.S. oil industry "This is God’s creation, and we have a moral responsibility to be good stewards of it; you may not share the religious view, but we all agree we have a moral responsibility to our children to preserve this planet." pic.twitter.com/4M2HbkBYTc — Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) October 23, 2020
In the midst lot of other unproven and disproven bafflegab about the security dangers of having the wrong view on climate issues, she wraps herself in the Mantle of Moses or the Apostles.
This was, remember, a tv segment in which she was defending Joe Biden’s position on ‘transitioning’ away from oil. Story here: Not Just FRACKING Anymore — Biden Just Threw OIL Under The Bus
Time stamp 2:27 for the bit when she shifts into sermonizing:
[list of climactic emergencies]…and it’s a values issue if you believe as I do that this is God’s creation and that we have a moral responsibility to be good stewards of it. But even if you don’t share that religious view, we all agree that we have a moral responsibility to our children to preserve this planet and pass it on to them…
For someone so concerned about ‘security’ she was decidedly disinterested in Joe’s troubles with allegations about payoffs from the Chinese Communist Party.
America — which is not abiding by Paris Treaty — has (since Trump scuttled it) has lowered its carbon production MORE than all of Europe combined.
If you really wanted to transition away from fossil fuel use you’d jump on the best shot at reliable energy sources that do NOT contribute to the much-ballyhooed warming: Generation IV nuclear power.
So many aspects of our economy are fossil fuel dependent. The manufacturing of steel, for instance, requires coal.
Synthetic materials, including the ones we use in our PPE, are fossil fuel based.
Farming is heavily reliant on fossil fuels.
So is everything we import from places like China. If you REALLY wanted to deal with the environmental issue you claim to care about, you would incentivize repatriation of manufacturing to America, where we have much more rigorous environmental regulations.
Biden and his Democrats haven’t a clue how to do that. Remember that ‘magic wand’ question they taunted Trump with? What we DO know is that their taxes and regulations will chase all that manufacturing right back to foreign shores where they neither operate under our environmental standards, nor do they fund an environmentally-conscious culture and nation. It isn’t AMERICAN rivers that are the chief offenders filled with plastic headed for the Oceans.
She forgets that developing nations building coal or gas plants help lift entire nations out of poverty.
Didn’t morality and decency used to include caring about THAT?
Let nobody tell you that the second decade of the 21st century has been a bad time. We are living through the greatest improvement in human living standards in history. Extreme poverty has fallen below 10 percent of the world’s population for the first time. It was 60 percent when I was born. Global inequality has been plunging as Africa and Asia experience faster economic growth than Europe and North America; child mortality has fallen to record low levels; famine virtually went extinct; malaria, polio and heart disease are all in decline. — Cancel The Apocalypse Party: This Was The BEST Decade In Human History — Here’s Why
Spin Joe’s gaffes all you want, Nancy. We’re not buying it.


thelibertydaily--2020-10-24--Gun Buyer Linked to 2015 Muslim Terrorist Attack in San Bernardino Gets 20 Years

RIVERSIDE , Calif. — The man who bought two rifles that husband-and-wife assailants used to kill 14 people in a Southern California terror attack nearly five years ago was sentenced Friday to 20 years in prison .
Enrique Marquez Jr. supplied the weapons that Syed Rizwan Farook and Farook ’ s wife , Tashfeen Malik , used on Dec. 2 , 2015 , to open fire on a meeting and holiday gathering of San Bernardino County employees who worked with Farook .
Minutes later , a post on a Facebook page associated with Malik pledged allegiance to the leader of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ couple fled and died later that day in a gunbattle with authorities .
Marquez , 28 , showed no emotion during a federal court hearing as relatives of the victims asked the judge to give him a lengthy sentence for providing Farook the guns years before the shooting , which at the time was the deadliest terror attack in the United States since 9/11 .
Gregory Clayborn , whose daughter Sierra was killed , said Marquez should be held responsible for the massacre though he wasn ’ t the gunman .
“ He @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” Clayborn told the judge .
“ And if you let him out , he ’ s going to do it again.
” Prosecutors sought a 25-year sentence for Marquez , arguing that he gave semiautomatic weapons and explosives to Farook though he knew Farook was inspired by violent extremists and had plotted with him years earlier to kill large numbers of people in attacks on a highway and college campus .
At the hearing , federal prosecutor Melanie Sartoris said Marquez has a high IQ and the mental capacity to understand @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had bought the weapons .
“ He knew all along that this would happen , ” but he did nothing , she said .
NEW DETAILS OF KIDNAPPING PLOT AGAINST MICHIGAN GOV .
WHITMER EMERGE The defense had asked for a five-year term .
Marquez 's attorney , John Aquilina , said his client had been manipulated by Farook since he was 13 , when they met as neighbors .
Marquez was desperate to socialize with others and needed to escape abuse at home .
He had stopped speaking to Farook years before @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it was going to happen , Aquilina said .
“ Mr .
Marquez ’ s sentence should not be reflective of what happened in San Bernardino , ” he said .
In determining the sentence , U.S. District Judge Jesus Bernal said he took into account that Marquez had called 911 and cooperated with authorities .
“ In a legal sense , I can not punish Mr. Marquez for your loss , ” Bernal told the families in his courtroom .
“ He is not responsible for the murders.
” DEATH TOLL OF @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 58 TO 60 Hilario Venoya Jr. , whose son was shot twice and survived , said he wished Marquez received a longer sentence .
His son didn ’ t attend the hearing because he is trying to move on .
“ He ’ ll never be the same , ” Venoya said .
Marquez and his family moved next door to Farook 's family in 2005 .
Authorities said that by 2011 , Marquez was spending time at Farook ’ s house , watching videos involving what they said was “ radical Islamic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shooting , authorities said Marquez and Farook plotted terrorist attacks on Riverside City College and a highway , State Route 91 .
But Marquez abandoned the idea and distanced himself from Farook in 2012 after three other Southern California men were arrested on suspicion of planning to go to Afghanistan to kill U.S. troops .
Eventually , the three and a fourth man were sentenced to federal prison for conspiracy .
Farook met Malik , who lived in Pakistan , online .
She traveled to the United States to marry Farook in 2014 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the couple left their 6-month-old daughter with Farook 's mother , saying they were going to a doctor 's appointment .
Afterward , police chased the pair through San Bernardino , which is 60 miles ( 97 kilometers ) east of Los Angeles .
Soon after they were killed , Marquez called 911 to say the shooter was his neighbor and had used his gun .
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP The next day , Marquez went to a hospital emergency room and was placed in a psychiatric ward .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ FBI interviews , described his research into terror attacks , purchase of explosives and the plans he had made with Farook , according to U.S. authorities .
Marquez pleaded guilty in 2017 to conspiring with Farook to provide material support to terrorists and making false statements regarding the rifles he had purchased in his name using Farook ’ s money .
He later tried to withdraw his plea to one of the counts , but the request was denied by the court .
Associated Press writer Amy Taxin in Orange County , California @ @ @ @ @

RIVERSIDE, Calif. — The man who bought two rifles that husband-and-wife assailants used to kill 14 people in a Southern California terror attack nearly five years ago was sentenced Friday to 20 years in prison.
Enrique Marquez Jr. supplied the weapons that Syed Rizwan Farook and Farook’s wife, Tashfeen Malik, used on Dec. 2, 2015, to open fire on a meeting and holiday gathering of San Bernardino County employees who worked with Farook. Minutes later, a post on a Facebook page associated with Malik pledged allegiance to the leader of the Islamic State terror group. The couple fled and died later that day in a gunbattle with authorities.
Marquez, 28, showed no emotion during a federal court hearing as relatives of the victims asked the judge to give him a lengthy sentence for providing Farook the guns years before the shooting, which at the time was the deadliest terror attack in the United States since 9/11.
Gregory Clayborn, whose daughter Sierra was killed, said Marquez should be held responsible for the massacre though he wasn’t the gunman.
EIFFEL TOWER STABBING INVESTIGATED AS RACIST INCIDENT, SHOUTED 'DIRTY ARABS': REPORT
“He’s a terrorist, your honor,” Clayborn told the judge. “And if you let him out, he’s going to do it again.”
Prosecutors sought a 25-year sentence for Marquez, arguing that he gave semiautomatic weapons and explosives to Farook though he knew Farook was inspired by violent extremists and had plotted with him years earlier to kill large numbers of people in attacks on a highway and college campus.
At the hearing, federal prosecutor Melanie Sartoris said Marquez has a high IQ and the mental capacity to understand the likelihood of an attack once he had bought the weapons.
“He knew all along that this would happen,” but he did nothing, she said.
NEW DETAILS OF KIDNAPPING PLOT AGAINST MICHIGAN GOV. WHITMER EMERGE
The defense had asked for a five-year term. Marquez's attorney, John Aquilina, said his client had been manipulated by Farook since he was 13, when they met as neighbors.
Marquez was desperate to socialize with others and needed to escape abuse at home. He had stopped speaking to Farook years before the attack and didn’t know it was going to happen, Aquilina said.
“Mr. Marquez’s sentence should not be reflective of what happened in San Bernardino,” he said.
In determining the sentence, U.S. District Judge Jesus Bernal said he took into account that Marquez had called 911 and cooperated with authorities.
“In a legal sense, I cannot punish Mr. Marquez for your loss,” Bernal told the families in his courtroom. “He is not responsible for the murders.”
DEATH TOLL OF THE 2017 LAS VEGAS MASSACRE RISES FROM 58 TO 60
Hilario Venoya Jr., whose son was shot twice and survived, said he wished Marquez received a longer sentence. His son didn’t attend the hearing because he is trying to move on.
“He’ll never be the same,” Venoya said.
Marquez and his family moved next door to Farook's family in 2005. Authorities said that by 2011, Marquez was spending time at Farook’s house, watching videos involving what they said was “radical Islamic content.’”
Several years before the shooting, authorities said Marquez and Farook plotted terrorist attacks on Riverside City College and a highway, State Route 91.
But Marquez abandoned the idea and distanced himself from Farook in 2012 after three other Southern California men were arrested on suspicion of planning to go to Afghanistan to kill U.S. troops. Eventually, the three and a fourth man were sentenced to federal prison for conspiracy.
Farook met Malik, who lived in Pakistan, online. She traveled to the United States to marry Farook in 2014.
To carry out the shooting, the couple left their 6-month-old daughter with Farook's mother, saying they were going to a doctor's appointment. Afterward, police chased the pair through San Bernardino, which is 60 miles (97 kilometers) east of Los Angeles. Soon after they were killed, Marquez called 911 to say the shooter was his neighbor and had used his gun.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The next day, Marquez went to a hospital emergency room and was placed in a psychiatric ward. He was later arrested, and in FBI interviews, described his research into terror attacks, purchase of explosives and the plans he had made with Farook, according to U.S. authorities.
Marquez pleaded guilty in 2017 to conspiring with Farook to provide material support to terrorists and making false statements regarding the rifles he had purchased in his name using Farook’s money. He later tried to withdraw his plea to one of the counts, but the request was denied by the court.
Associated Press writer Amy Taxin in Orange County, California contributed to this report.


thelibertydaily--2020-10-24--Police Caught Targeting Jewish Gathering in Private Home

New York Police officers were caught on video harassing a private gathering inside the resident of an Orthodox Jew .
@ @ @ @ @ stuff in Nazi Germany .
In recent months New York Gov .
Andrew Cuomo and @ @ @ @ @ have overseen a crackdown on religious gatherings — primarily the city ’ s Orthodox Jewish @ @ @ @ @ dispatched to break up funerals and even weddings .
This is truly heinous , anti-Semitic @ @ @ @ @ be silent .
We must stand alongside Jewish Americans .
Silence in the face of @ @ @ @ @ evil itself .
EDITOR ’ S NOTE : Social media is cracking down on Conservative @ @ @ @ @ have complained that you never see our content in your news feeds .
There ’ @ @ @ @ @ fight back — and that ’ s by subscribing to my FREE weekly newsletter .
@ @ @

New York Police officers were caught on video harassing a private gathering inside the resident of an Orthodox Jew.
They did this sort of stuff in Nazi Germany. In recent months New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and NYC Mayor Bill De Blasio have overseen a crackdown on religious gatherings — primarily the city’s Orthodox Jewish population.
Police have been dispatched to break up funerals and even weddings. This is truly heinous, anti-Semitic behavior.
Christians must not be silent. We must stand alongside Jewish Americans. Silence in the face of this sort of evil is evil itself.
EDITOR’S NOTE: Social media is cracking down on Conservative content. Many of you have complained that you never see our content in your news feeds. There’s only one way to fight back — and that’s by subscribing to my FREE weekly newsletter. Click here.


thelibertydaily--2020-10-24--Under Trump’s Administration Black Prison Rate Lowest It’s Been In 31 Years

Under the administration of President Donald Trump , our nation ’ s black prison rate has dropped to the lowest numbers we ’ ve seen since 1995 , criminal justice reform .
This is a testament to the commander-in-chief ’ s commitment to much-needed criminal justice reform , as he pushed through the First Step Act .
One of the purposes of that bill was to relieve the mandatory sentencing set by Joe Biden ’ s 1995 tough on crime bill called the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act .
But it seems that Trump ’ s reforms have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bill which ended up targeting minorities for extra prison time .
For blacks , the imprisonment rate in state and federal prisons is the lowest in 31 years , and for Hispanics , it is down 24 % .
take our poll - story continues below Will You Be Voting In Person November 3rd ?
( 3 ) • None Will You Be Voting In Person November 3rd ?
• None Should the Government be Mandating Masks ?
• None My State Is Not Allowing In Person Voting • None This field is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unchanged .
Completing this poll grants you access to The Lid updates free of charge .
You may opt out at anytime .
You also agree to this site 's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use .
“ Across the decade from 2009 to 2019 , the imprisonment rate fell 29 % among black residents , 24 % among Hispanic residents and 12 % among white residents .
In 2019 , the imprisonment rate of black residents was the lowest it has been in 30 years , since 1989 , ” said the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said , “ At year-end 2019 , there were 1,096 sentenced black prisoners per 100,000 black residents , 525 sentenced Hispanic prisoners per 100,000 Hispanic residents and 214 sentenced white prisoners per 100,000 white residents in the U.S .
Among sentenced state prisoners at year-end 2018 ( the most recent data available ) , a larger percentage of black ( 62 % ) and Hispanic ( 62 % ) prisoners than white prisoners ( 48 % ) were serving time for a violent offense.
” For the sake of the report , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prison for more than a single year .
The report itself did not give specific reasons for the drop in the imprisonment rate .
This is definitely a strong policy point for the president and he ’ s made sure to point to this part of his record on various occasions .
And well he should , particularly as the Democratic Party continues to push the issue of race in an attempt to try and shut him and the GOP down in not only this election , but all the ones to come @ @ @

Under the administration of President Donald Trump, our nation’s black prison rate has dropped to the lowest numbers we’ve seen since 1995. This is a testament to the commander-in-chief’s commitment to much-needed criminal justice reform, as he pushed through the First Step Act. One of the purposes of that bill was to relieve the mandatory sentencing set by Joe Biden’s 1995 tough on crime bill called the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act.
But it seems that Trump’s reforms have reversed the effects of Biden’s bill which ended up targeting minorities for extra prison time.
Per the Washington Examiner:
For blacks, the imprisonment rate in state and federal prisons is the lowest in 31 years, and for Hispanics, it is down 24%. “Across the decade from 2009 to 2019, the imprisonment rate fell 29% among black residents, 24% among Hispanic residents and 12% among white residents. In 2019, the imprisonment rate of black residents was the lowest it has been in 30 years, since 1989,” said the report. Explaining the rate, Justice said, “At year-end 2019, there were 1,096 sentenced black prisoners per 100,000 black residents, 525 sentenced Hispanic prisoners per 100,000 Hispanic residents and 214 sentenced white prisoners per 100,000 white residents in the U.S. Among sentenced state prisoners at year-end 2018 (the most recent data available), a larger percentage of black (62%) and Hispanic (62%) prisoners than white prisoners (48%) were serving time for a violent offense.”
For the sake of the report, the Justice Department counts individuals who are in prison for more than a single year.
The report itself did not give specific reasons for the drop in the imprisonment rate.
This is definitely a strong policy point for the president and he’s made sure to point to this part of his record on various occasions. And well he should, particularly as the Democratic Party continues to push the issue of race in an attempt to try and shut him and the GOP down in not only this election, but all the ones to come as well.
Cross-Posted from Flag and Cross
black prison rate
https://lidblog.com


thelibertydaily--2020-10-24--California Prosecutors Again Seek Death for Scott Peterson

SACRAMENTO , Calif.—Northern California prosecutors said Friday they will again seek the death penalty for Scott Peterson in the slaying of his pregnant wife and unborn son nearly 19 years ago , even as a county judge considers throwing out his underlying conviction because of a tainted juror .
Stanislaus County Assistant District Attorney Dave Harris announced that it is prosecutors ’ intention to retry the penalty phase of the case , spokesman John Goold said after a court hearing .
He said prosecutors otherwise won ’ t comment or discuss the decision .
Peterson , 47 , wearing a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prevent the spread of the coronavirus , appeared remotely in the Modesto courtroom from San Quentin State Prison north of San Francisco , home to the state ’ s death row .
District Attorney Birgit Fladager acted after the California Supreme Court in August overturned Peterson ’ s 2005 death sentence in a case that attracted worldwide attention .
The state ’ s high court upheld his conviction in that ruling .
But the same justices in October ordered a new hearing in San Mateo Superior Court to determine whether his underlying murder @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a juror committed “ prejudicial misconduct.
” “ He ’ s innocent—an innocent man ’ s been sitting in jail for 15 years .
It ’ s time to get him out , ” attorney Pat Harris told reporters outside the courtroom in explaining why he is again taking the case .
He also was on Peterson ’ s original trial team alongside celebrity attorney Mark Geragos .
Janey Peterson , his sister-in-law , said the family is looking forward to his new day in court .
“ We still need justice for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she told reporters .
“ We don ’ t have justice for Laci with Scott on death row , because Scott is innocent.
” Peterson was convicted in San Mateo Superior Court after his trial was moved from Stanislaus County due to the massive pre-trial publicity that followed the Christmas Eve 2002 disappearance of 27-year-old Laci Peterson , who was eight months pregnant with their unborn son , Connor .
Investigators say Peterson took the bodies from their Modesto home and dumped them from his fishing boat into San Francisco Bay , where @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Court said his death sentence could not stand because potential jurors were improperly dismissed from the jury pool after saying they personally disagreed with the death penalty but would be willing to follow the law and impose it .
In the second ruling , it ordered a San Mateo judge to decide whether the conviction itself must be overturned because one juror failed to disclose that she had sought a restraining order in 2000 against her boyfriend ’ s ex-girlfriend .
The juror said in seeking the order that she feared for her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will have to decide if that was juror misconduct , and if so if it was so prejudicial that a new trial is warranted .
Pat Harris said he was “ sandbagged ” by prosecutors ’ surprisingly swift announcement that they would again seek the death penalty , and said he needs to consult with Peterson before agreeing to put off the penalty phase until the judge decides whether to throw out underlying conviction .
They set a new court appearance for Nov. 6 .
“ It ’ s been 15 long years @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are ups and downs , but overall he was very happy that the court is basically taking a look at the motions , taking a look at the evidence , and has given him two separate chances here .
So we ’ re excited about that , ” Pat Harris said of Peterson ’ s reaction to the high court ’ s dual rulings .
Peterson was convicted of first-degree murder of his wife and second-degree murder of his unborn son .
Peterson was arrested after Amber Frey , a massage therapist living @ @ @ @ @ @ @ began dating a month before his wife ’ s death , but that he had told her his wife was dead .
Despite throwing out the death penalty , the Supreme Court said there was considerable incriminating circumstantial evidence against Peterson , including that he researched ocean currents , bought a boat without telling anyone , and couldn ’ t explain what type of fish he was trying to catch that day .
He also sold his wife ’ s car , considered selling their house , and turned the baby nursery into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ found , the court said in August , all indicating that “ he already knew Laci and Conner were never coming back.
” California has not executed anyone since 2006 because of legal challenges , and Democratic Gov .
Gavin Newsom issued a moratorium on executions for as long as he is governor .

Scott Lee Peterson in a booking photo. (Courtesy of California Department of Corrections 2011)
SACRAMENTO, Calif.—Northern California prosecutors said Friday they will again seek the death penalty for Scott Peterson in the slaying of his pregnant wife and unborn son nearly 19 years ago, even as a county judge considers throwing out his underlying conviction because of a tainted juror.
Stanislaus County Assistant District Attorney Dave Harris announced that it is prosecutors’ intention to retry the penalty phase of the case, spokesman John Goold said after a court hearing. He said prosecutors otherwise won’t comment or discuss the decision.
Peterson, 47, wearing a buzz haircut and a mask designed to prevent the spread of the coronavirus, appeared remotely in the Modesto courtroom from San Quentin State Prison north of San Francisco, home to the state’s death row.
District Attorney Birgit Fladager acted after the California Supreme Court in August overturned Peterson’s 2005 death sentence in a case that attracted worldwide attention.
The state’s high court upheld his conviction in that ruling. But the same justices in October ordered a new hearing in San Mateo Superior Court to determine whether his underlying murder conviction must also be tossed out if a juror committed “prejudicial misconduct.”
“He’s innocent—an innocent man’s been sitting in jail for 15 years. It’s time to get him out,” attorney Pat Harris told reporters outside the courtroom in explaining why he is again taking the case. He also was on Peterson’s original trial team alongside celebrity attorney Mark Geragos.
Janey Peterson, his sister-in-law, said the family is looking forward to his new day in court.
“We still need justice for Laci, Connor and Scott,” she told reporters. “We don’t have justice for Laci with Scott on death row, because Scott is innocent.”
Peterson was convicted in San Mateo Superior Court after his trial was moved from Stanislaus County due to the massive pre-trial publicity that followed the Christmas Eve 2002 disappearance of 27-year-old Laci Peterson, who was eight months pregnant with their unborn son, Connor.
Investigators say Peterson took the bodies from their Modesto home and dumped them from his fishing boat into San Francisco Bay, where they surfaced months later.
The Supreme Court said his death sentence could not stand because potential jurors were improperly dismissed from the jury pool after saying they personally disagreed with the death penalty but would be willing to follow the law and impose it.
In the second ruling, it ordered a San Mateo judge to decide whether the conviction itself must be overturned because one juror failed to disclose that she had sought a restraining order in 2000 against her boyfriend’s ex-girlfriend.
The juror said in seeking the order that she feared for her unborn child.
The San Mateo judge will have to decide if that was juror misconduct, and if so if it was so prejudicial that a new trial is warranted.
Pat Harris said he was “sandbagged” by prosecutors’ surprisingly swift announcement that they would again seek the death penalty, and said he needs to consult with Peterson before agreeing to put off the penalty phase until the judge decides whether to throw out underlying conviction.
They set a new court appearance for Nov. 6.
“It’s been 15 long years, and as you can imagine there are ups and downs, but overall he was very happy that the court is basically taking a look at the motions, taking a look at the evidence, and has given him two separate chances here. So we’re excited about that,” Pat Harris said of Peterson’s reaction to the high court’s dual rulings.
Peterson was convicted of first-degree murder of his wife and second-degree murder of his unborn son. Peterson was arrested after Amber Frey, a massage therapist living in Fresno, told police that they began dating a month before his wife’s death, but that he had told her his wife was dead.
Despite throwing out the death penalty, the Supreme Court said there was considerable incriminating circumstantial evidence against Peterson, including that he researched ocean currents, bought a boat without telling anyone, and couldn’t explain what type of fish he was trying to catch that day.
He also sold his wife’s car, considered selling their house, and turned the baby nursery into a storage room before their bodies were found, the court said in August, all indicating that “he already knew Laci and Conner were never coming back.”
California has not executed anyone since 2006 because of legal challenges, and Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom issued a moratorium on executions for as long as he is governor.


thelibertydaily--2020-10-24--Leftist Chelsea Handler on 50 Cent Backing President Trump: ‘I Had to Remind Him That He Was a Black

Leftist Chelsea Handler on 50 Cent Backing President Trump: ‘I Had to Remind Him That He Was a Black Person’

Chelsea Handler offered an explanation as to why she publicly scolded her ex-boyfriend 50 Cent for supporting President Trump during her Friday night appearance on `` The Tonight Show . ''
The comedian had been feuding with 50 Cent -- born Curtis James Jackson III -- since Monday when he shared an image from a news broadcast on Instagram that depicted the rates at which certain places would be taxed under Joe Biden 's plan .
The broadcast highlighted New York state ( 58 % ) and New York City ( 62 % ) .
`` WHAT THE F -- @ @ @ @ @ @ @ OUT , '' wrote Jackson in the caption .
`` F -- K NEW YORK The KNICKS never win anyway .
I don ’ t care Trump doesn ’ t like black people 62 % are you out of ya f -- king mind . ''
Handler insisted the 62 percent tax hike `` is n't a plan '' under Joe Biden , calling it a `` lie '' during her interview with `` Tonight Show '' host Jimmy Fallon .
50 CENT DOUBLES DOWN ON OPPOSITION TO JOE BIDEN 'S TAX PLAN @ @ @ @ @ @ @ BE 20CENT' '' So he does n't want to pay 62 percent in taxes because he does n't want to go from '50 Cent ' to '20 Cent ' and I had to remind him that he was a Black person , so he can ’ t vote for Donald Trump and that he should n't be influencing an entire swath of people who may listen to him because he 's worried about his own personal pocketbook , “ Handler said .
The remark seemed reminiscent of Biden 's `` You ai n't @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with radio host Charlamagne Tha God , for which the Democrat was heavily criticized earlier this year .
Handler said she `` has n't heard back '' from Fiddy but told Fallon she 's willing to `` seal the deal in more ways than one '' in order to get her ex-boyfriend to publicly denounce Trump .
`` I might be willing to go for another spin , if you know what I ’ m talking about , '' Handler added .
The pair dated briefly in 2011 , according to Us Weekly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one another long after their split .
However , things appeared to have soured after 50 Cent made headlines with his support for Trump .
`` You used to be my favorite ex-boyfriend , '' Handler replied to his tweet on Tuesday .
`` Oh my God this is effecting [ sic ] my love life now , '' 50 Cent responded .
`` @ chelseahandler I love ya Gator , don ’ t let Trump and Joe Biden come between us girl . ''
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pay the rapper 's taxes should he reconsider his support for the president .
`` Hey f -- ker !
I will pay your taxes in exchange for you coming to your senses , '' wrote the frequent Trump critic on Wednesday .
`` Happily !
Black lives matter .
That ’ s you , f -- ker !
Remember ? ''

Chelsea Handler offered an explanation as to why she publicly scolded her ex-boyfriend 50 Cent for supporting President Trump during her Friday night appearance on "The Tonight Show."
The comedian had been feuding with 50 Cent -- born Curtis James Jackson III -- since Monday when he shared an image from a news broadcast on Instagram that depicted the rates at which certain places would be taxed under Joe Biden's plan. The broadcast highlighted New York state (58%) and New York City (62%).
"WHAT THE F--K! (VOTE ForTRUMP) IM OUT," wrote Jackson in the caption. "F--K NEW YORK The KNICKS never win anyway. I don’t care Trump doesn’t like black people 62% are you out of ya f--king mind."
Handler insisted the 62 percent tax hike "isn't a plan" under Joe Biden, calling it a "lie" during her interview with "Tonight Show" host Jimmy Fallon.
50 CENT DOUBLES DOWN ON OPPOSITION TO JOE BIDEN'S TAX PLAN: 'I DON'T WANT TO BE 20CENT'
"So he doesn't want to pay 62 percent in taxes because he doesn't want to go from '50 Cent' to '20 Cent' and I had to remind him that he was a Black person, so he can’t vote for Donald Trump and that he shouldn't be influencing an entire swath of people who may listen to him because he's worried about his own personal pocketbook,“ Handler said.
The remark seemed reminiscent of Biden's "You ain't Black" comment, during an interview with radio host Charlamagne Tha God, for which the Democrat was heavily criticized earlier this year.
Handler said she "hasn't heard back" from Fiddy but told Fallon she's willing to "seal the deal in more ways than one" in order to get her ex-boyfriend to publicly denounce Trump.
"I might be willing to go for another spin, if you know what I’m talking about," Handler added.
The pair dated briefly in 2011, according to Us Weekly, and appeared to be friendly with one another long after their split.
However, things appeared to have soured after 50 Cent made headlines with his support for Trump.
"You used to be my favorite ex-boyfriend," Handler replied to his tweet on Tuesday.
"Oh my God this is effecting [sic] my love life now," 50 Cent responded. "@chelseahandler I love ya Gator, don’t let Trump and Joe Biden come between us girl."
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
In response, Handler has offered to pay the rapper's taxes should he reconsider his support for the president.
"Hey f--ker! I will pay your taxes in exchange for you coming to your senses," wrote the frequent Trump critic on Wednesday. "Happily! Black lives matter. That’s you, f--ker! Remember?"
Fox News' Nate Day contributed to this report.


thelibertydaily--2020-10-25--Pro-Trump Group Heckles Beijing Biden’s Drive-In Rally in Pennsylvania

A parade of people backing President Trump on Saturday crashed Democratic nominee Joe Biden 's drive-in rally in Bristol , Penn .
The former vice president called the band of Trump supporters parked outside his rally `` chumps '' while addressing the crowd .
“ I ’ m running as a proud Democrat , but I will govern as an American president , '' he said .
`` I ’ ll work as hard for those who don ’ t support me as those who do , including those chumps with the microphone out there .
Look , that ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The duty to care for everyone .
The duty to heal . ''
He continued later : “ By the way , we don ’ t do things like those chumps out there with the microphone and Trump guys .
It ’ s about decency . ''
The pro-Trump group honked horns , flew Trump flags and made other commotion in what appeared to be an effort to distract from Biden 's rally .
PENNSYLVANIA AG SLAMS TRUMP AS 'BAD ACTOR ' , URGES VOTERS TO 'IGNORE THE DOUBT ' AND VOTE At @ @ @ @ @ @ @ through a megaphone on various videos posted to Twitter , shouting slogans including `` Four more years . ''
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

A parade of people backing President Trump on Saturday crashed Democratic nominee Joe Biden's drive-in rally in Bristol, Pa.
The former vice president called the band of Trump supporters parked outside his rally "chumps" while addressing the crowd.
"I’m running as a proud Democrat, but I will govern as an American president," he said. "I’ll work as hard for those who don’t support me as those who do, including those chumps with the microphone out there. Look, that’s the job of the president. The duty to care for everyone. The duty to heal."
PA SUPREME COURT TOSSES BALLOT SIGNATURE-MATCHING RULE
He continued later: "By the way, we don’t do things like those chumps out there with the microphone and Trump guys. It’s about decency."
The pro-Trump group honked horns, flew Trump flags and made other commotion in what appeared to be an effort to distract from Biden's rally.
PENNSYLVANIA AG SLAMS TRUMP AS 'BAD ACTOR', URGES VOTERS TO 'IGNORE THE DOUBT' AND VOTE
At least one person could be heard speaking through a megaphone on various videos posted to Twitter, shouting slogans including "Four more years."
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP


thelibertydaily--2020-10-25--Nuns Wearing ‘Make America Great Again’ Masks Spotted Behind President Trump at Rally

A group of Trump-loving nuns grabbed attention on social media Saturday after they were spotted wearing MAGA masks with their habits and cheering the president on in Circleville , Ohio .
Three nuns were behind the president ’ s podium , two holding rosaries and a third holding a Bible .
During the Republican National Convention , another nun , Sister Deirdre Byrne , called the president the “ most pro-life president ever.
” '' Donald Trump is the most pro-life president that this nation has ever had , defending life at all stages .
His belief in the sanctity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said .
`` President Trump will stand up against Biden-Harris , who are the most anti-life presidential ticket ever , even supporting the horrors of late-term abortions and infanticide , ” she continued .
In Ohio , during a campaigning marathon that included five events , Trump told supporters he never would have won if his opponent Joe Biden `` did a good job '' as vice president .
TRUMP CASTS HIS BALLOT IN FLORIDA , BRACES FOR MARATHON WEEKEND OF RALLIES 10 DAYS BEFORE ELECTION '' I would n't have run , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ job .
I had a very nice life .
I would n't have run if you did a good job , '' the president said .
Trump said that Biden is the first politician to run promising tax hikes .
`` He 's the first politician ever to run saying he 's going to quadruple your taxes .
This is the craziest thing I 've ever seen , '' he said .
Biden has said he would raise taxes on the rich , promising not to raise them on anyone making $ 400,000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ APP '' You let us down , Joe , '' Trump said , calling Biden a `` 47-year politician who used his job to enrich himself . ''

A group of Trump-loving nuns grabbed attention on social media Saturday after they were spotted wearing MAGA masks with their habits and cheering the president on in Circleville, Ohio.
Three nuns were behind the president’s podium, two holding rosaries and a third holding a Bible.
During the Republican National Convention, another nun, Sister Deirdre Byrne, called the president the “most pro-life president ever.”
TRUMP RALLIES OHIO IN JAM-PACKED SATURDAY
"Donald Trump is the most pro-life president that this nation has ever had, defending life at all stages. His belief in the sanctity of life transcends politics,” Byrne said.
"President Trump will stand up against Biden-Harris, who are the most anti-life presidential ticket ever, even supporting the horrors of late-term abortions and infanticide,” she continued.
In Ohio, during a campaigning marathon that included five events, Trump told supporters he never would have won if his opponent Joe Biden "did a good job" as vice president.
TRUMP CASTS HIS BALLOT IN FLORIDA, BRACES FOR MARATHON WEEKEND OF RALLIES 10 DAYS BEFORE ELECTION
"I wouldn't have run, Joe, if you did a good job. I had a very nice life. I wouldn't have run if you did a good job," the president said.
Trump said that Biden is the first politician to run promising tax hikes.
"He's the first politician ever to run saying he's going to quadruple your taxes. This is the craziest thing I've ever seen," he said.
Biden has said he would raise taxes on the rich, promising not to raise them on anyone making $400,000.
CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP
"You let us down, Joe," Trump said, calling Biden a "47-year politician who used his job to enrich himself."


thelibertydaily--2020-10-25--Hitting From The Left: President Trump Uses Breadline Bernie Campaign Video To Hammer Beijing Biden

President Donald Trump hit Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden from the left on Friday evening , tweeting out a campaign video that Sen. Bernie Sanders ( I-VT ) used when he was running against Biden earlier this year .
The video from Sanders , who lost the Democratic primary for president in 2020 and 2016 , came from a debate back in March when he and Biden argued about Biden ’ s record on Social Security .
“ For years , Joe Biden fought to cut your Social Security and Medicare—a fact which Joe falsely denied last night , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Joe Biden ’ s own words ) was created by Bernie Sanders earlier this year to expose Joe Biden ’ s atrocious record and egregious lies !
” For years , Joe Biden fought to cut your Social Security and Medicare—a fact which Joe falsely denied last night .
This video ( Joe Biden ’ s own words ) was created by Bernie Sanders earlier this year to expose Joe Biden ’ s atrocious record and egregious lies !
pic.twitter.com/womMTc70RP Bernie Sanders : Oh , well .
Let me ask you a question @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re right here with me .
Bernie Sanders : Have you been on the floor of the Senate ?
You were in the Senate for a few years .
Bernie Sanders : Time and time again talking about the necessity , with pride , about cutting Social Security , cutting Medicare , cutting veterans programs .
Bernie Sanders : You never said that ?
Joe Biden : When I argued if we should freeze federal spending , I meant Social Security as well .
I meant Medicare and Medicaid .
I meant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ single , solitary thing in the government .
Bernie Sanders : You ’ re an honest guy .
Why don ’ t you just tell the truth here ?
We all make mistakes .
Joe Biden : And I not only tried it once , I tried it twice , I tried it a third time , and I tried it a fourth time .
Bernie Sanders : All right .
Joe , let me repeat it again .
I want you just to be straight with the American people .
I am @ @ @ @ @ @ @ floor of the Senate time and time again , talking about the need to cut Social Security , Medicare , and veterans programs .
Is that true or is that not true ?
Bernie Sanders : That is not true ?
Joe Biden : That is not true .
Joe Biden : I meant veterans ’ benefits .
I meant every single , solitary thing in the government .
Joe Biden : Everything was on the table .
I did not support any of those cuts , and Social Security or in veterans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Whoa .
Whoa .
Everything was on the table .
All right , you ’ re right .
You just said it .
Including in your judgment , cuts to Social Security and veterans .
Joe Biden : In order to get the kinds of changes we need on other things related , but we did not cut it .
I did not vote for it .
Bernie Sanders : I know , because people like me helped stop that .
… All that I would say to the American people , go @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over the place .
Joe said it many , many times .
I ’ m surprised .
You can defend it or change your mind on it , but you can ’ t deny the reality .

President Donald Trump hit Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden from the left on Friday evening, tweeting out a campaign video that Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) used when he was running against Biden earlier this year.
The video from Sanders, who lost the Democratic primary for president in 2020 and 2016, came from a debate back in March when he and Biden argued about Biden’s record on Social Security.
“For years, Joe Biden fought to cut your Social Security and Medicare—a fact which Joe falsely denied last night,” Trump tweeted. “This video (Joe Biden’s own words) was created by Bernie Sanders earlier this year to expose Joe Biden’s atrocious record and egregious lies!”
WATCH:
For years, Joe Biden fought to cut your Social Security and Medicare—a fact which Joe falsely denied last night. This video (Joe Biden’s own words) was created by Bernie Sanders earlier this year to expose Joe Biden’s atrocious record and egregious lies! pic.twitter.com/womMTc70RP — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 24, 2020
TRANSCRIPT:


thelibertydaily--2020-10-25--Super Spreader! Joe Biden Looks Fragile as He Shuffles Over to a Crowd of People Without Wearing a F

Super Spreader! Joe Biden Looks Fragile as He Shuffles Over to a Crowd of People Without Wearing a Face Mask

77-year-old Joe Biden traveled to Bucks County , Pennsylvania on Saturday to deliver remarks at a drive-in rally .
Biden @ @ @ @ @ Saturday and called them “ chumps.
” After lecturing people on mask wearing , Joe @ @ @ @ @ taking any questions and walked over to a group of people without his face mask @ @ @ @ @ he shuffled over to a crowd of people without wearing his face mask .

77-year-old Joe Biden traveled to Bucks County, Pennsylvania on Saturday to deliver remarks at a drive-in rally.
Biden snapped at Trump supporters on Saturday and called them “chumps.”
After lecturing people on mask wearing, Joe Biden left the podium without taking any questions and walked over to a group of people without his face mask.
Joe Biden’s gait raised eyebrows.
Biden looked fragile as he shuffled over to a crowd of people without wearing his face mask.
WATCH:


thelibertydaily--2020-10-25--Kanye West on Joe Rogan: The Idea That I Was Part of the Abortion Culture ‘Just Tears Me Up Inside’

KANYE West admitted it 'tears ' him up that he considered aborting his daughter North , 7 , with Kim Kardashian .
The rapper turned presidential candidate had said at a South Carolina rally over the summer he initially did not want the pregnancy .
On the new nearly three hour episode of the podcast Joe Rogan Experience , Kanye said how he was `` gut wrenched over the admission sharing : “ I don ’ t even like to say out loud what I said in South Carolina.
” He went on : “ People saw this clip of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t know what I was crying about .
But I was crying about that there was a possible chance…that we — Kim and I — didn ’ t make the family that we have today .
`` That ’ s my most family-friendly way to word that , ” he said , clearly still affected by the moment .
“ The idea of [ abortion ] just tears me up inside , that I was a part of a culture that promotes this kind of thing.
” During a July presidential campaign rally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kim almost aborted North .
The 43-year-old rapper sobbed as he told the South Carolina crowd : `` She had the pills in her hand .
My girlfriend called me screaming , crying .
`` I 'm a rapper .
And she said I 'm pregnant .
She was crying . ''
Kanye also said on Joe Rogan 's podcast although he 's a Christian and pro-choice , he would not change the laws if he were elected president .
He affirmed : “ We have to de-couple the conversation of planned parenthood @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ m Christian so I ’ m pro-life — when I go into office , I ’ m not changing laws because I realize we live in an imperfect world and society .
`` What I will present is a Plan A to change the connotation of foster care , ” he said . ''
Kim is reportedly considering breaking up Kanye , as he has allegedly been struggling with mental health issues in recent months .
Us Weekly previously reported : `` Kim is considering her options when it comes to her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stressed out between studying law , taking care of the kids and helping Kanye . ''
The couple shares four children , North , Saint , Chicago and Psalm .

KANYE West admitted it 'tears' him up that he considered aborting his daughter North, 7, with Kim Kardashian.
The rapper turned presidential candidate had said at a South Carolina rally over the summer he initially did not want the pregnancy.
6 Kanye West admitted it 'tears' him up that he considered aborting his daughter North, 7, with Kim Kardashian Credit: Joe Rogan Experience
6 The rapper turned presidential candidate had said at a South Carolina rally over the summer he initially did not want the pregnancy Credit: Splash News
On the new nearly three hour episode of the podcast Joe Rogan Experience, Kanye said how he was "gut wrenched over the admission sharing: “I don’t even like to say out loud what I said in South Carolina.”
He went on: “People saw this clip of me crying and some people didn’t know what I was crying about. But I was crying about that there was a possible chance…that we — Kim and I — didn’t make the family that we have today.
"That’s my most family-friendly way to word that,” he said, clearly still affected by the moment. “The idea of [abortion] just tears me up inside, that I was a part of a culture that promotes this kind of thing.”
6 Kanye appeared on the new nearly three hour episode of the podcast Joe Rogan Experience Credit: Joe Rogan Experience
6 Kim is reportedly considering breaking up Kanye, as he has allegedly been struggling with mental health issues in recent months Credit: Getty - Contributor
During a July presidential campaign rally in South Carolina Kanye claimed he and Kim almost aborted North.
The 43-year-old rapper sobbed as he told the South Carolina crowd: "She had the pills in her hand. My girlfriend called me screaming, crying.
"I'm a rapper. And she said I'm pregnant. She was crying."
6 During a July presidential campaign rally in South Carolina Kanye claimed he and Kim almost aborted North Credit: Alamy Live News
6 Kim and Kanye share four children, North, Saint, Chicago and Psalm Credit: Instagram
Kanye also said on Joe Rogan's podcast although he's a Christian and pro-choice, he would not change the laws if he were elected president.
He affirmed: “We have to de-couple the conversation of planned parenthood and women’s choice. I’m Christian so I’m pro-life — when I go into office, I’m not changing laws because I realize we live in an imperfect world and society.
"What I will present is a Plan A to change the connotation of foster care,” he said."
Kim is reportedly considering breaking up Kanye, as he has allegedly been struggling with mental health issues in recent months.
Us Weekly previously reported: "Kim is considering her options when it comes to her future with Kanye.
"She is stressed out between studying law, taking care of the kids and helping Kanye."
The couple shares four children, North, Saint, Chicago and Psalm.
[pod_component pod_component_config_id="BB1w9H6DA" pod_component_config_url="https://www.thesun.co.uk/nu-sun-pod-component-config-prod/BB1w9H6DA.json" pod_component_config_loader_url="https://www.thesun.co.uk/nu-sun-pod-loaders-prod/1.71.1/componentLoader.js?74679" src="https%3A%2F%2Fiframe.thesun.co.uk%2Fnu-sun-pod-widgets-prod%2Fiframe-pod.html%3Fid%3DBB1w9H6DA%26script%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.thesun.co.uk%2Fnu-sun-pod-loaders-prod%2F1.71.1%2FcomponentLoader.js%3F74679%26config%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.thesun.co.uk%2Fnu-sun-pod-component-config-prod%2FBB1w9H6DA.json"]


thelibertydaily--2020-10-24--Republicans Convene Rare Weekend Senate Session to Ensure Amy Coney Barrett’s Swift Supreme Court Co

Republicans Convene Rare Weekend Senate Session to Ensure Amy Coney Barrett’s Swift Supreme Court Confirmation

Senate Republicans and Democrats faced off in a rare weekend session to debate the Supreme Court nomination of Amy Coney Barrett .
Senate Democrats , who unanimously oppose Barrett , objected to the session and tried to call up a series of Democratic bills , including a House coronavirus spending measure and the Violence Against Women Act , which they said should be the legislative priority .
“ We meet here on a rare Saturday session because there 's nothing , nothing remotely normal about the Republican drive to confirm Judge Barrett , to the Supreme Court , ” Minority @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democrat , said .
Republicans plan to barrel ahead with Barrett ’ s confirmation .
A key procedural vote is slated for Sunday , and lawmakers are expected to cast the final votes to confirm Barrett on Monday .
Republican leaders said Democrats can ’ t object to Barrett ’ s qualifications and are instead making a false claim that the confirmation process is illegitimate .
“ It remains our duty to separate right from wrong , fact from fiction , for the good of the Senate and our nation , ” Majority @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , said on the Senate floor .
“ Judge Barrett ’ s confirmation process has followed every rule .
It ’ s followed the Constitution in every respect .
We have abided by the norms and traditions dictated by our history .
And we ’ re going to vote tomorrow.
” Sunday ’ s vote will advance Barrett ’ s nomination toward a final confirmation vote on Monday night .
The Senate will then likely gavel to a close until a post-election , “ lame-duck ” session .
Democrats , who are in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ block Barrett from the Supreme Court despite intense pressure to do so from their liberal base .
Democrats boycotted the Senate Judiciary Committee vote to advance Barrett ’ s nomination and yesterday stalled the floor with procedural votes and a closed-door session .
Democratic leaders repeatedly went to the floor Saturday to request the GOP to withdraw Barrett ’ s nomination and instead bring up the coronavirus spending bill , which was authored by House Democrats and has little to no backing from the GOP .
“ During the most desperate , desperate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the ability to debate something that really matters to the American people , ” Schumer said , noting the recent rise in coronavirus cases .
Republicans objected to Schumer ’ s request to take up the House coronavirus aid package , noting Democrats rejected a more narrow GOP bill that provided $ 500 billion in aid .
They also blocked motions by Democratic Minority Whip Dick Durbin of Illinois to bring up the Violence Against Women Act and an election security bill .
“ This request is another procedural move to just belabor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , an Indiana Republican , said .

Senate Republicans and Democrats faced off in a rare weekend session to debate the Supreme Court nomination of Amy Coney Barrett.
Senate Democrats, who unanimously oppose Barrett, objected to the session and tried to call up a series of Democratic bills, including a House coronavirus spending measure and the Violence Against Women Act, which they said should be the legislative priority.
“We meet here on a rare Saturday session because there's nothing, nothing remotely normal about the Republican drive to confirm Judge Barrett, to the Supreme Court,” Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, said.
Republicans plan to barrel ahead with Barrett’s confirmation. A key procedural vote is slated for Sunday, and lawmakers are expected to cast the final votes to confirm Barrett on Monday.
Republican leaders said Democrats can’t object to Barrett’s qualifications and are instead making a false claim that the confirmation process is illegitimate.
“It remains our duty to separate right from wrong, fact from fiction, for the good of the Senate and our nation,” Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, said on the Senate floor. “Judge Barrett’s confirmation process has followed every rule. It’s followed the Constitution in every respect. We have abided by the norms and traditions dictated by our history. And we’re going to vote tomorrow.”
Sunday’s vote will advance Barrett’s nomination toward a final confirmation vote on Monday night. The Senate will then likely gavel to a close until a post-election, “lame-duck” session.
Democrats, who are in the minority, have no ability to block Barrett from the Supreme Court despite intense pressure to do so from their liberal base. Democrats boycotted the Senate Judiciary Committee vote to advance Barrett’s nomination and yesterday stalled the floor with procedural votes and a closed-door session.
Democratic leaders repeatedly went to the floor Saturday to request the GOP to withdraw Barrett’s nomination and instead bring up the coronavirus spending bill, which was authored by House Democrats and has little to no backing from the GOP.
“During the most desperate, desperate of times, all we ask is the ability to debate something that really matters to the American people,” Schumer said, noting the recent rise in coronavirus cases.
Republicans objected to Schumer’s request to take up the House coronavirus aid package, noting Democrats rejected a more narrow GOP bill that provided $500 billion in aid. They also blocked motions by Democratic Minority Whip Dick Durbin of Illinois to bring up the Violence Against Women Act and an election security bill.
“This request is another procedural move to just belabor the process,” Sen. Mike Braun, an Indiana Republican, said.