thelibertydaily--2020-12-28--Another Blow for Liberal Lockdown Lunacy

Much of the strategy of lockdowns and other attacks on our communities has depended upon the alleged pheneomenon of asymptomatic transmission – the contention that people who have tested positive for Covid19 but have no symptoms ( ie , are not actually ill ) – which comprises about 80 % – can still carry and transmit the disease to others .
In other words , you can have the bug and not know it and then unwittingly infect somebody else with it .
This then provides the pretext for shutting down schools , masks , distancing , the isolation , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ plus instilling in healthy people ( which includes vast numbers of children ) the idea that they could “ kill their grandmother ” without knowing it .
That pretext in turn is based on this scenatio : • they have no symptoms • yet “ because asymptomatic people can still infect others ” they have to be isolated and so on .
But , of course , most of the positives are themselves false .
The useleness of the widely used PCR test for reliably detecting the presence of the virus in anyone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government has simply ignored that and persisted with the flawed tests and the egregiously bogus stats based thereon tells you all you need to know about the honesty of the subversives stage-managing this fiasco .
Even where the “ positive ” is not false , it is still only detecting the presence of minute remnants of the DNA of past but long gone infections with coronaviruses such as flu and “ common cold ” viruses .
And now we discover , as the folowing article goes over , that research has proven that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also FALSE .
It is easy to understand however that much of the apparently docile compliance of some of the public with the measures derived from the Covid Terror narrative hinges on the implanted fear that they might unwittingly infect and thus harm others , that there is a hidden creeping menace out there that they can ’ t see and which is spreading even though they and hardly anyobody they know is actually ill !
As the article mentions , the tactic of the Covid Terror Faction infiltrated into our governments , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ narrative out of the water , is to simply ignore them and , with the help of collaborators in the media , to prevent that vital information reaching the public .
Indeed once can observe that a great deal of time and effort is expended by the Covid Terror Faction and its collaborators to control what information reaches the attention of the public .
When you take the layers of fasehoods that comprise this so-called pandemic and strip them away , there is virtually nothing left .
Except the suspicious obsession of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as many people to submit to a dodgy vaccine as quickly as possible – preferably before anybody has time to think or ask awkward questions , such as : • what is in it ?
• what are its short medium and long term adverse effects ?
• why are you really in such a tearing hurry to inject the populace with it ?
Asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 didn ’ t occur at all , study of 10 million finds Only 300 asymptomatic cases in the study of nearly 10 million were discovered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for COVID-19 .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Introduction
by Watchdog
Much of the strategy of lockdowns and other attacks on our communities has depended upon the alleged pheneomenon of asymptomatic transmission – the contention that people who have tested positive for Covid19 but have no symptoms (ie, are not actually ill) – which comprises about 80% – can still carry and transmit the disease to others.
In other words, you can have the bug and not know it and then unwittingly infect somebody else with it.
This then provides the pretext for shutting down schools, masks, distancing, the isolation, lockdown and so on of healthy people plus instilling in healthy people (which includes vast numbers of children) the idea that they could “kill their grandmother” without knowing it. That pretext in turn is based on this scenatio:
the person tests positive
they have no symptoms
yet “because asymptomatic people can still infect others” they have to be isolated and so on.
But, of course, most of the positives are themselves false.
The useleness of the widely used PCR test for reliably detecting the presence of the virus in anyone has been thoroughly exposed. That the government has simply ignored that and persisted with the flawed tests and the egregiously bogus stats based thereon tells you all you need to know about the honesty of the subversives stage-managing this fiasco.
Even where the “positive” is not false, it is still only detecting the presence of minute remnants of the DNA of past but long gone infections with coronaviruses such as flu and “common cold” viruses.
And now we discover, as the folowing article goes over, that research has proven that the “asymptomatic infection” contention is also FALSE.
It is easy to understand however that much of the apparently docile compliance of some of the public with the measures derived from the Covid Terror narrative hinges on the implanted fear that they might unwittingly infect and thus harm others, that there is a hidden creeping menace out there that they can’t see and which is spreading even though they and hardly anyobody they know is actually ill!
As the article mentions, the tactic of the Covid Terror Faction infiltrated into our governments, when faced with findings that blow their narrative out of the water, is to simply ignore them and, with the help of collaborators in the media, to prevent that vital information reaching the public. Indeed once can observe that a great deal of time and effort is expended by the Covid Terror Faction and its collaborators to control what information reaches the attention of the public.
When you take the layers of fasehoods that comprise this so-called pandemic and strip them away, there is virtually nothing left.
Except the suspicious obsession of the Vax Faction in our government with getting as many people to submit to a dodgy vaccine as quickly as possible – preferably before anybody has time to think or ask awkward questions, such as:
what is in it?
what are its short medium and long term adverse effects?
why are you really in such a tearing hurry to inject the populace with it?
Enjoy the article.
Asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 didn’t occur at all, study of 10 million finds
by Michael Haynes
Only 300 asymptomatic cases in the study of nearly 10 million were discovered, and none of those tested positive for COVID-19.
LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here. ANALYSIS WUHAN, China, December 23, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – A study of almost 10 million people in Wuhan, China, found that asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 did not occur at all, thus undermining the need for lockdowns, which are built on the premise of the virus being unwittingly spread by infectious, asymptomatic people. Published in November in the scientific journal Nature Communications, the paper was compiled by 19 scientists, mainly from the Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan, but also from scientific institutions across China as well as in the U.K. and Australia. It focused on the residents of Wuhan, ground zero for COVID-19, where 9,899,828 people took part in a screening program between May 14 and June 1, which provided clear results as to the possibility of any asymptomatic transmission of the virus. Asymptomatic transmission has been the underlying justification of lockdowns enforced all across the world. The most recent guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) still states that the virus “can be spread by people who do not have symptoms.” In fact, the CDC claimed that asymptomatic people “are estimated to account for more than 50 percent of transmissions.” U.K. Health Secretary Matt Hancock also promoted this message, explaining that the concept of asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 led to the U.K. advocating masks and referring to the “problem of asymptomatic transmission.” It stated that out of the nearly 10 million people in the study, “300 asymptomatic cases” were found. Contact tracing was then carried out and of those 300, no cases of COVID-19 were detected in any of them. “A total of 1,174 close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases were traced, and they all tested negative for the COVID-19.” Both the asymptomatic patients and their contacts were placed in isolation for two weeks, and after the fortnight, the results remained the same. “None of detected positive cases or their close contacts became symptomatic or newly confirmed with COVID-19 during the isolation period.” Further evidence showed that “virus cultures” in the positive and repositive asymptomatic cases were all negative, “indicating no ‘viable virus’ in positive cases detected in this study.” Ages of those found to be asymptomatic ranged between 10 and 89, with the asymptomatic positive rate being “lowest in children or adolescents aged 17 and below” and highest rate found among people older than 60. The study also made the realization that due to a weakening of the virus itself, “newly infected persons were more likely to be asymptomatic and with a lower viral load than earlier infected cases.” These results are not without precedent. In June, Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, shed doubt upon asymptomatic transmission. Speaking at a press conference, Van Kerkhove explained, “From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual.” She then repeated the words “It’s very rare,” but despite her word choice of “rare,” Van Kerkhove could not point to a single case of asymptomatic transmission, noting that numerous reports “were not finding secondary transmission onward.” Her comments went against the predominant narrative justifying lockdowns, and at the time the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) highlighted that “she undermined the last bit of rationale there could be for lockdowns, mandated masks, social distancing regulation, and the entire apparatus of compulsion and coercion under which we’ve lived for three months.” Swift to act, the WHO performed a U-turn, and the next day Van Kerkhove then declared that asymptomatic transmission was a “really complex question … We don’t actually have that answer yet.” “I think that that’s misunderstanding to state that asymptomatic transmission globally is very rare. I was referring to a small subset of studies,” she added. However, the new Wuhan study seems to present solid, scientific evidence that asymptomatic transmission is not just rare but nonexistent. Given that it found “no evidence that the identified asymptomatic positive cases were infectious,” the study raises important questions about lockdowns. Commenting on the study, The Conservative Tree House noted that “all of the current lockdown regulations, mask wearing requirements and social distancing rules/decrees are based on a complete fallacy of false assumptions.” The evidence presented in the study shows that “‘very rare’ actually means ‘never’ asymptomatic spread just doesn’t happen – EVER.” Such a large scientific study of 10 million people should not be overlooked, Jeffrey Tucker argued in the AIER, as it should be “huge news,” paving the way “to open up everything immediately.” Yet media reports have been virtually nonexistent and “ignored,” a fact that Tucker explained: “The lockdown lobby ignores whatever contradicts their narrative, preferring unverified anecdotes over an actual scientific study of 10 million residents in what was the world’s first major hotspot for the disease we are trying to manage.” The recent findings should enable society to reopen once more, according to the AIER. Without asymptomatic transmission, “the whole basis for post-curve-flattening lockdowns,” life should resume and “we could take comfort in our normal intuition that healthy people can get out and about with no risk to others. “We keep hearing about how we should follow the science,” Tucker added. “The claim is tired by now. We know what’s really happening.” He closed his commentary with the question: “With solid evidence that asymptomatic spread is nonsense, we have to ask: Who is making decisions and why?” The above article is from Lifesite News. Visit Lifesite News now for more great articles. Their excellent and extensive Covid19 resources page is here.
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertydaily--2020-12-28--In Cobb County, GA, 78% of Absentee Ballots Breached Chain of Custody

A lawsuit was filed in the District of Colombia on December 22nd by the Amistad Project against Vice President Pence , the Senate , House , Electoral College , and leaders of the swing states and the elections .
In Cobb County , Georgia , the Ballot Transfer Forms show that 78 % of the 89,000 ( 69,420 ) absentee ballots breached the Chain of Custody and were not transported as Georgia election rules require .
The lawsuit focuses on the $ 400 million of Zuckerberg ’ s money used to determine how election offices would operate .
CTCL funding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ States .
Moreover , the use of drop boxes materially breached the chain of custody of ballots .
For example , ballot transfer forms in Cobb County , Georgia , show 78 % of the 89,000 absentee ballots were not transported as Georgia election rules require .
Additionally , the use of drop boxes and changes in the signature comparison requirements for absentee ballots were approved by the Georgia Secretary of State without legislative approval .
The presence of CTCL funds in other states facilitated conduct contrary to state law as well .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ request , five cities used CTCL seed monies to draft the “ Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan 2020 , ” so named despite the failure of the city leaders to include any other Wisconsin election officials .
The plan , and communications relating to the plan , provided for extensive voter turnout efforts , considered state voter identification laws an obstacle and required the use of drop boxes , curbside voting , and salaries for additional staffing.
” CTCL funding was used to “ dramatically expand voter and community education and outreach , particularly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election rules or laws ?
What ’ s the point since they will do anything they feel like doing to give the advantage to the candidates they favor ?
How can that be ignored ?
And what happens in the senatorial race when this type of sloppiness or corruption continues ?
Nothing has been done to stop it .
These ballots can just keep coming in for weeks or months .
We are the Banana Republic , and no court cares .
As a socialist on ‘ Hannity ’ said , they have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and they want to “ destroy every last one of you .
”

A lawsuit was filed in the District of Colombia on December 22nd by the Amistad Project against Vice President Pence, the Senate, House, Electoral College, and leaders of the swing states and the elections.
In Cobb County, Georgia, the Ballot Transfer Forms show that 78% of the 89,000 (69,420) absentee ballots breached the Chain of Custody and were not transported as Georgia election rules require.
The lawsuit focuses on the $400 million of Zuckerberg’s money used to determine how election offices would operate.
The lawsuit claims:
CTCL funding produced similar results in the other Defendant States. Moreover, the use of drop boxes materially breached the chain of custody of ballots. For example, ballot transfer forms in Cobb County, Georgia, show 78% of the 89,000 absentee ballots were not transported as Georgia election rules require.
Additionally, the use of drop boxes and changes in the signature comparison requirements for absentee ballots were approved by the Georgia Secretary of State without legislative approval.
The presence of CTCL funds in other states facilitated conduct contrary to state law as well. In Wisconsin, at CTCL’s request, five cities used CTCL seed monies to draft the “Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan 2020,” so named despite the failure of the city leaders to include any other Wisconsin election officials. The plan, and communications relating to the plan, provided for extensive voter turnout efforts, considered state voter identification laws an obstacle and required the use of drop boxes, curbside voting, and salaries for additional staffing.”
CTCL funding was used to “dramatically expand voter and community education and outreach, particularly to historically disenfranchised residents.”
Why have election rules or laws? What’s the point since they will do anything they feel like doing to give the advantage to the candidates they favor?
How can that be ignored? And what happens in the senatorial race when this type of sloppiness or corruption continues? Nothing has been done to stop it.
These ballots can just keep coming in for weeks or months. We are the Banana Republic, and no court cares.
As a socialist on ‘Hannity’ said, they have the courts. We have nothing, and they want to “destroy every last one of you.”
Watch:
Related


thelibertydaily--2020-12-29--‘Highly Suspicious’ Overnight Church Fire Potentially a Hate Crime, Official Says

Officials are investigating a fire at a church in Massachusetts as a potential hate crime , numerous sources reported .
Martin Luther King Jr. Community Presbyterian Church in Springfield was “ unusable ” after flames tore through the church early Monday morning .
Firefighters responded to the scene at around 5 a.m. , and the fire was put out before 8 a.m. , according to WWLP .
Springfield Fire Commissioner Bernard Calvi said the fire was “ highly suspicious ” because there were three other fires in the area in the last three weeks .
“ It ’ s a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it ’ s a potential hate crime , ” Calvi added , according to NBC .
Fire officials are investigating the possibility that the fire was accidental and local police and FBI are canvassing the area for possible leads .
The roof of the church had recently been replaced after a fundraising campaign , Ronn Johnson of Martin Luther King , Jr. Family Services said , according to WWLP .
Johnson added that there were multiple incidents of vandalism around the church in recent weeks and cardboard had been set on fire .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ vandalism targeting churches across the country .
In November , two churches in Washington state were damaged by fire on the same day , leading investigators to determine one of the fires , set at Sacred Heart Catholic Church in Brewster , was arson .
In a separate incident that month , a man was caught on surveillance footage at Saint Bernard Catholic Church in Sunrise , Florida setting a fire after destroying a statue of Jesus .
( RELATED : Shirtless Man Caught On Video Throwing Rock At Jesus Statue , Lighting @ @ @ @ @

Officials are investigating a fire at a church in Massachusetts as a potential hate crime, numerous sources reported.
Martin Luther King Jr. Community Presbyterian Church in Springfield was “unusable” after flames tore through the church early Monday morning. Firefighters responded to the scene at around 5 a.m., and the fire was put out before 8 a.m., according to WWLP.
#BREAKING: Firefighters are on scene of a church fire in #Springfield at the Martin Luther King Jr Community Presbyterian Church on Concord Terrace. ????: @SFD_HQ#7News pic.twitter.com/8KTXHtpzIl — Kevin Wiles Jr (@kwilesjrnews) December 28, 2020
Springfield Fire Commissioner Bernard Calvi said the fire was “highly suspicious” because there were three other fires in the area in the last three weeks.
“It’s a church that burned at nighttime, so it’s a potential hate crime,” Calvi added, according to NBC.
Fire officials are investigating the possibility that the fire was accidental and local police and FBI are canvassing the area for possible leads.
The roof of the church had recently been replaced after a fundraising campaign, Ronn Johnson of Martin Luther King, Jr. Family Services said, according to WWLP. Johnson added that there were multiple incidents of vandalism around the church in recent weeks and cardboard had been set on fire.
The incident follows numerous other arsons and vandalism targeting churches across the country.
In November, two churches in Washington state were damaged by fire on the same day, leading investigators to determine one of the fires, set at Sacred Heart Catholic Church in Brewster, was arson. In a separate incident that month, a man was caught on surveillance footage at Saint Bernard Catholic Church in Sunrise, Florida setting a fire after destroying a statue of Jesus. (RELATED: Shirtless Man Caught On Video Throwing Rock At Jesus Statue, Lighting Church Property On Fire)


thelibertydaily--2020-12-29--WHAT? Democrat Lawmakers Could End Up with GOP House Speaker Thanks to Chi-Com Virus Rules

Due to a number of unforeseen events , current Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ’ s grip on power has grown more tenuous .
The vote for her to retain her lofty position is scheduled for Jan. 3 , and there is anxiety among some Pelosi allies that there may not be enough Democratic votes on that date for her to keep the gavel .
According to The Hill , COVID-19 illnesses , a loss of a dozen Democratic seats during the 2020 elections and three obstinate Democratic House members could keep enough Democratic voting members from voting “ yes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ speaker ’ s position .
Not only that , but it could even mean a Republican like House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California could sneak in and win the coveted spot .
The role and election of the top leadership position in the House is not defined in the Constitution .
Instead , it ’ s up to the House to make its own rules .
During the COVID-19 pandemic , according to The Hill , House rules have allowed members to vote remotely by phone .
However , those rules expire @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The rules outlined for the Jan. 3 vote stipulate that a member has to be present in the House chamber to cast a ballot .
That ’ s where things can get tricky .
So far 35 members of Congress have come down with the disease , five are out right now and if a family member or colleague comes down with the virus , members are told to quarantine for 14 days , according to The Hill .
Besides the possibility of not having sick members able to vote , according to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democratic members who are not supporting Pelosi : Reps. Conor Lamb of Pennsylvania , Jared Golden of Maine and Elissa Slotkin of Michigan .
Some Democrats don ’ t discount the possibility of surprise in the speaker vote .
Kentucky Rep. John Yarmuth told The Hill that COVID-19 is the wild card .
“ Let ’ s say , just theoretically , we had six or eight people out with COVID and the Republicans have none .
They probably could elect McCarthy.
” Another Democratic lawmaker also thinks the outcome is not certain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ slim majority after November ’ s elections and departures of those chosen to serve in a potential Biden administration , according to CNN .
“ COVID is a wild card , ” said Rep. Hank Johnson of Georgia told The Hill .
“ If we have sick members who can not come back , and we only have a four-vote majority , it throws our entire advent of the 117th Congress in peril — a smooth advent.
” Johnson added that an appearance of chaos just before the Senate runoff elections in Georgia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that it could have on the race [ s ] down in Georgia , it is unsettling , ” he told The Hill .
To avoid it , Pelosi is calling on all of her loyalists to put the heat on a number of her naysayers hoping they will stay the course , The Hill reported .
One member who voted against Pelosi during the November caucus , says he ’ ll now vote for her .
Democratic Oregon Rep. Kurt Schrader said in an interview with The Associated Press that he ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to rebrand Democrats as more moderate .
“ She may be the bulwark against the extreme far left , ” he said .
RELATED : Lawmaker , Other Republicans Sue Pence To Stop Biden from Taking Office A number of the so-call extreme far-left have maintained their support for Pelosi ’ s leadership position .
As The AP reported , after Democrats won the House majority in the 2018 midterms , Pelosi had early clashes with then-newcomers such as Democratic New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez , but was able to fight them off @ @ @ @ @ @ @ speaker has been skillful in fighting back opposition from both flanks .
“ There ’ s the usual suspects who make it part of their brand to vote against her .
But I think there ’ s an awareness — and there ’ s certainly a message coming from within the caucus — that this may not be a year for the usual branding , ” Democratic Connecticut Rep. Jim Himes told The Hill .
“ We ’ re a fractious bunch , but Pelosi ’ s very , very good at what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going to earn her money.
” Pelosi was first elected to Congress in 1987 .
In 2002 , she was elected to head her party , after her eighth term .
She was first elected speaker of the House after the 2006 midterms , when Democrats won majorities in both the House and Senate .
She served as minority leader after Republicans won the chamber in the 2010 midterms , then returned to the speaker ’ s with the opening of the 116th Congress in January 2019 .
Even if a Republican were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of politics and the coronavirus pandemic , it ’ s not likely to last .
A House speaker can be removed through a parliamentary maneuver known as a “ motion to vacate the chair , ” according to Ballotpedia .
A new speaker could then be elected , according to the Congressional Research Service .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Due to a number of unforeseen events, current Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s grip on power has grown more tenuous. The vote for her to retain her lofty position is scheduled for Jan. 3, and there is anxiety among some Pelosi allies that there may not be enough Democratic votes on that date for her to keep the gavel.
According to The Hill, COVID-19 illnesses, a loss of a dozen Democratic seats during the 2020 elections and three obstinate Democratic House members could keep enough Democratic voting members from voting “yes” that it could cost Pelosi the speaker’s position. Not only that, but it could even mean a Republican like House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California could sneak in and win the coveted spot.
The role and election of the top leadership position in the House is not defined in the Constitution. Instead, it’s up to the House to make its own rules. During the COVID-19 pandemic, according to The Hill, House rules have allowed members to vote remotely by phone. However, those rules expire at the end of the year. The rules outlined for the Jan. 3 vote stipulate that a member has to be present in the House chamber to cast a ballot. That’s where things can get tricky.
So far 35 members of Congress have come down with the disease, five are out right now and if a family member or colleague comes down with the virus, members are told to quarantine for 14 days, according to The Hill.
Besides the possibility of not having sick members able to vote, according to The Hill, there are likely three Democratic members who are not supporting Pelosi: Reps. Conor Lamb of Pennsylvania, Jared Golden of Maine and Elissa Slotkin of Michigan.
Some Democrats don’t discount the possibility of surprise in the speaker vote. Kentucky Rep. John Yarmuth told The Hill that COVID-19 is the wild card.
“Let’s say, just theoretically, we had six or eight people out with COVID and the Republicans have none. They probably could elect McCarthy.”
Another Democratic lawmaker also thinks the outcome is not certain, especially with Democrats holding only a slim majority after November’s elections and departures of those chosen to serve in a potential Biden administration, according to CNN.
“COVID is a wild card,” said Rep. Hank Johnson of Georgia told The Hill. “If we have sick members who cannot come back, and we only have a four-vote majority, it throws our entire advent of the 117th Congress in peril — a smooth advent.”
Could COVID-19 cause Pelosi's loss of the speaker's gavel? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 93% (1170 Votes) No: 7% (82 Votes)
Johnson added that an appearance of chaos just before the Senate runoff elections in Georgia would look bad. “The implications that it could have on the race[s] down in Georgia, it is unsettling,” he told The Hill.
To avoid it, Pelosi is calling on all of her loyalists to put the heat on a number of her naysayers hoping they will stay the course, The Hill reported.
One member who voted against Pelosi during the November caucus, says he’ll now vote for her.
Democratic Oregon Rep. Kurt Schrader said in an interview with The Associated Press that he’s spoken to Pelosi about the need to rebrand Democrats as more moderate.
“She may be the bulwark against the extreme far left,” he said.
A number of the so-call extreme far-left have maintained their support for Pelosi’s leadership position. As The AP reported, after Democrats won the House majority in the 2018 midterms, Pelosi had early clashes with then-newcomers such as Democratic New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, but was able to fight them off.
According to The Hill, the speaker has been skillful in fighting back opposition from both flanks.
“There’s the usual suspects who make it part of their brand to vote against her. But I think there’s an awareness — and there’s certainly a message coming from within the caucus — that this may not be a year for the usual branding,” Democratic Connecticut Rep. Jim Himes told The Hill.
“We’re a fractious bunch, but Pelosi’s very, very good at what she does. So she’s going to earn her money.”
Pelosi was first elected to Congress in 1987. In 2002, she was elected to head her party, after her eighth term. She was first elected speaker of the House after the 2006 midterms, when Democrats won majorities in both the House and Senate. She served as minority leader after Republicans won the chamber in the 2010 midterms, then returned to the speaker’s with the opening of the 116th Congress in January 2019.
Even if a Republican were elected speaker Jan. 3 through some combination of politics and the coronavirus pandemic, it’s not likely to last.
A House speaker can be removed through a parliamentary maneuver known as a “motion to vacate the chair,” according to Ballotpedia. A new speaker could then be elected, according to the Congressional Research Service.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


thelibertydaily--2020-12-29--Owner of Computer Repair Shop That Had Hunter Biden Laptop Sues Twitter for Defamation

The owner of the Delaware computer repair shop that was the source of Hunter Biden ’ s laptop has sued Twitter for defamation .
John Paul Mac Isaac , the owner of the Mac Shop , claims that Twitter defamed him by implying that he is a hacker when they censored the New York Post ’ s story about a laptop belonging to Hunter Biden , President-elect Joe Biden ’ s son .
The lawsuit , which was filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida , claims that Isaac “ is now widely considered a hacker @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In April of 2019 , Hunter Biden allegedly dropped his laptop off at the Mac Shop .
After he failed to pick it up , Isaac says that the New York Post obtained information about the hard drive through former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani .
The New York Post then published an article about the contents of the hard drive and included photos of Isaac ’ s business .
Isaac had no knowledge that the New York Post had any information about the hard drive or that the article was going @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lawsuit .
( RELATED : Hunter Biden Says He ’ s Being Investigated For Possible Tax Crimes ) The New York Post ’ s article included emails that allegedly showed that Hunter and Joe Biden met with an executive from Ukrainian gas company Burisma in 2015 .
Hunter Biden served on the firm ’ s Board of Directors .
After the article was published , Twitter prohibited users from posting links to the article or sending the article to others via direct message .
The company claimed that they censored the story because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ materials policy , which prevents the distribution of “ information obtained through a hack.
” ( RELATED : Twitter Unlocks New York Post Account ) Twitter later said that the article was censored because “ the images contained in the articles include personal and private information — like email addresses and phone numbers — which violate our rules.
” The lawsuit alleges that Twitter implied that Isaac was a hacker when they said that the story violated their hacked materials policy .
As a result , Isaac received threats and negative reviews of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to shut down , according to the lawsuit .
Isaac is asking the judge to order Twitter to pay $ 500 million in damages and issue a public retraction .

The owner of the Delaware computer repair shop that was the source of Hunter Biden’s laptop has sued Twitter for defamation.
John Paul Mac Isaac, the owner of the Mac Shop, claims that Twitter defamed him by implying that he is a hacker when they censored the New York Post’s story about a laptop belonging to Hunter Biden, President-elect Joe Biden’s son. The lawsuit, which was filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, claims that Isaac “is now widely considered a hacker” because of Twitter’s statements.
In April of 2019, Hunter Biden allegedly dropped his laptop off at the Mac Shop. After he failed to pick it up, Isaac says that the New York Post obtained information about the hard drive through former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani. The New York Post then published an article about the contents of the hard drive and included photos of Isaac’s business. Isaac had no knowledge that the New York Post had any information about the hard drive or that the article was going to be published, according to the lawsuit. (RELATED: Hunter Biden Says He’s Being Investigated For Possible Tax Crimes)
The New York Post’s article included emails that allegedly showed that Hunter and Joe Biden met with an executive from Ukrainian gas company Burisma in 2015. Hunter Biden served on the firm’s Board of Directors.
After the article was published, Twitter prohibited users from posting links to the article or sending the article to others via direct message. The company claimed that they censored the story because it was in violation of their hacked materials policy, which prevents the distribution of “information obtained through a hack.” (RELATED: Twitter Unlocks New York Post Account)
Twitter later said that the article was censored because “the images contained in the articles include personal and private information — like email addresses and phone numbers — which violate our rules.”
The images contained in the articles include personal and private information — like email addresses and phone numbers — which violate our rules.https://t.co/plPa5SZ3we — Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020
The lawsuit alleges that Twitter implied that Isaac was a hacker when they said that the story violated their hacked materials policy. As a result, Isaac received threats and negative reviews of his business, which he eventually had to shut down, according to the lawsuit.
Isaac is asking the judge to order Twitter to pay $500 million in damages and issue a public retraction.


thelibertydaily--2020-12-29--We Are Winning the Fight to Recall Democrat Dictator Gruesome Newsom

Gavin Newsom ’ s top advisors are “ increasingly concerned ” that the recall effort against him “ could mushroom into a major threat in 2021 , ” as Politico has reported .
The Sacramento Bee says that “ fending off ” the recall is a major challenge for Newsom ’ s new chief-of-staff ( a top lobbyist , to no one ’ s surprise ) .
And the Associated Press reports “ Newsom ’ s advisers are carefully watching the signature count.
” It reminds me of a quote sometimes attributed to Ghandi : “ First they ignore you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ then they attack you , then you win.
” One particularly ominous sign for Newsom is his that own party is musing about throwing him under the bus .
Politico quotes a Sacramento insider “ aligned with a major special interest group ” as saying , “ We ’ ve gotten calls from Democrats who are already kicking the tires.
” In a sign of desperation , the Newsom campaign put out a bizarre statement that initiating a recall against him is a “ refusal to play by the rules.
” I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Art .
II , § 13-18 , setting forth the rules for recalls .
( RELATED : How Gov .
Gavin Newsom Abuses Shutdowns To ‘ Reshape ’ California For ‘ Equity ’ ) The bar for a recall is undeniably high .
When Gray Davis was recalled in 2003 , only 900,000 verified signatures were required , but it will take 1.5 million to qualify the Newsom recall .
Current estimates are that about 850,000 signatures have been collected .
Countless volunteers are working tirelessly to increase that number every day @ @ @ @ @ @ @ calls a “ French Laundry list ” of reasons for people to sign .
The campaign received a major shot in the arm when a Sacramento Superior Court extended the deadline to March 17 .
The ability to launch a recall was added to the California Constitution through a special election in 1911 .
Supported by Gov .
Hiram Johnson and growing out of a national political movement associated with Teddy Roosevelt , it was seen as a tool to “ unlock the special interest grip ” on state politics .
That grip @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now .
Newsom may not have created all the problems causing California ’ s decline , but he fully embodies them – to the point of caricature .
And he ’ s dramatically accelerated them in a way we never could have imagined .
( RELATED : Federal Court Blocks California Church ’ s Bid For In-Person Worship On Christmas ) California ’ s response to COVID-19 has been among the worst in America , with great economic destruction , loss of life , and violations of democratic norms .
Courts continue to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lacks justification .
Health experts say that school closures are doing incalculable harm to kids .
Hundreds of thousands of Californians continue to wait on unemployment benefits while hundreds of millions of dollars fly out the door of his EDD Office to prisoners scamming the government .
Californians sense the American dream is dead here .
In a new poll by the non-partisan Public Policy Institute of California , a nearly two thirds of Californians say kids growing up in the state today will be worse off than their parents .
And recently @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worst population growth in a century , as we lost 135,600 people to other states over the last year .
Mark Baldassare with PPIC called the numbers “ really startling , ” saying , “ This isn ’ t the Golden State of the past ” where people came from all over “ to find their way to the California dream.
” Quite a few politicians , like myself , are supporting the recall effort .
But this began as a citizens ’ movement and it will succeed as a citizens ’ movement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to remove the most corrupt governor in America , but to save the California Dream before it ’ s too late .
Kevin Kiley is a California legislator and author of the forthcoming book “ Recall Newsom : The Case Against America ’ s Most Corrupt Governor ” Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience .
For licensing opportunities of our original content , please contact licensing @ dailycallernewsfoundation.org .

Gavin Newsom’s top advisors are “increasingly concerned” that the recall effort against him “could mushroom into a major threat in 2021,” as Politico has reported.
The Sacramento Bee says that “fending off” the recall is a major challenge for Newsom’s new chief-of-staff (a top lobbyist, to no one’s surprise). And the Associated Press reports “Newsom’s advisers are carefully watching the signature count.” It reminds me of a quote sometimes attributed to Gandhi: “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they attack you, then you win.”
One particularly ominous sign for Newsom is his that own party is musing about throwing him under the bus. Politico quotes a Sacramento insider “aligned with a major special interest group” as saying, “We’ve gotten calls from Democrats who are already kicking the tires.” In a sign of desperation, the Newsom campaign put out a bizarre statement that initiating a recall against him is a “refusal to play by the rules.” I’d suggest he peruse the California Constitution, Art. II, § 13-18, setting forth the rules for recalls. (RELATED: How Gov. Gavin Newsom Abuses Shutdowns To ‘Reshape’ California For ‘Equity’)
The bar for a recall is undeniably high. When Gray Davis was recalled in 2003, only 900,000 verified signatures were required, but it will take 1.5 million to qualify the Newsom recall. Current estimates are that about 850,000 signatures have been collected. Countless volunteers are working tirelessly to increase that number every day, with what Lead Proponent Orrin Heatlie calls a “French Laundry list” of reasons for people to sign. The campaign received a major shot in the arm when a Sacramento Superior Court extended the deadline to March 17.
The ability to launch a recall was added to the California Constitution through a special election in 1911. Supported by Gov. Hiram Johnson and growing out of a national political movement associated with Teddy Roosevelt, it was seen as a tool to “unlock the special interest grip” on state politics. That grip has never been tighter than it is now. Newsom may not have created all the problems causing California’s decline, but he fully embodies them – to the point of caricature. And he’s dramatically accelerated them in a way we never could have imagined. (RELATED: Federal Court Blocks California Church’s Bid For In-Person Worship On Christmas)
California’s response to COVID-19 has been among the worst in America, with great economic destruction, loss of life, and violations of democratic norms. Courts continue to rule that Newsom’s lockdown strategy lacks justification. Health experts say that school closures are doing incalculable harm to kids. Hundreds of thousands of Californians continue to wait on unemployment benefits while hundreds of millions of dollars fly out the door of his EDD Office to prisoners scamming the government.
Californians sense the American dream is dead here. In a new poll by the non-partisan Public Policy Institute of California, a nearly two thirds of Californians say kids growing up in the state today will be worse off than their parents. And recently released data shows California just had its worst population growth in a century, as we lost 135,600 people to other states over the last year. Mark Baldassare with PPIC called the numbers “really startling,” saying, “This isn’t the Golden State of the past” where people came from all over “to find their way to the California dream.”
Quite a few politicians, like myself, are supporting the recall effort. But this began as a citizens’ movement and it will succeed as a citizens’ movement. It is a fight not only to remove the most corrupt governor in America, but to save the California Dream before it’s too late.
Kevin Kiley is a California legislator and author of the forthcoming book “Recall Newsom: The Case Against America’s Most Corrupt Governor”
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.


thelibertydaily--2020-12-29--Camper Reveals How He Was Abused at Marxist Democrat Raphael Warnock’s “Church” Camp

A camper by the name of Anthony Washington , who was 12-years old when he attended Raphael Warnock ’ s church camp , revealed to Free Beacon how he was abused at the camp back in the early 2000s : Washington , now 30 , recounted the events in an interview with the Washington Free Beacon and said his experience at the camp resulted in a 2003 lawsuit that ended two years later , when Washington says he and his family received a large financial settlement .
Among the indignities 12-year-old Anthony Washington endured at the church camp overseen by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ urine on him and locked him outside his cabin overnight .
Washington said the camp was his first extended trip away from his parents as a child , and his first time in such a rural environment .
His mother sent the two children because they had recently moved from California to Baltimore and she hoped they would make friends in the area , according to Washington .
Counselors were young , in their late teens or early 20s , and showed little interest in taking care of the campers , Washington said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bed , he said a counselor forced him to spend the next night sleeping outside by himself on the basketball court .
“ I ’ m like , ‘ Hell no I ’ m not , it ’ s cold out there , ’ ” he said .
“ [ The counselors ] wouldn ’ t let me in the house , not at all .
… Shut the door to the cabin , locked it , ” he said .
“ It was dark .
There wasn ’ t nothing out there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t never experienced nothing like that .
Like , you ’ re not in a tent , you ’ re not in nothing .
You ’ re just out , God knows where.
” Counselors also threw urine on him from a bucket they used when there wasn ’ t a bathroom nearby , he added .
“ I went through that experience myself .
I don ’ t even like talking about this shit .
That shit happened .
… It was like in a bucket .
They would keep that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said .
Washington said he saw counselors “ grab kids , ” but didn ’ t know the extent of abuse at the camp or whether others had experiences similar to his .
“ I just knew that shit happened to me , and that ’ s what I was worried about , me and my sister , ” he said .
Campers were prohibited from calling their parents , he said .
When he was finally able to tell his mother what happened , she was furious at the camp .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ screaming at them , ” Washington said .
“ Next thing I knew , my mother was going to court .
… I thank my mother for doing what she did .
She is a life saver.
” The family eventually received a financial settlement in the case , said Washington .

A camper by the name of Anthony Washington, who was 12-years old when he attended Raphael Warnock’s church camp, revealed to Free Beacon how he was abused at the camp back in the early 2000s:
Among the indignities 12-year-old Anthony Washington endured at the church camp overseen by Reverend Raphael Warnock: counselors who tossed urine on him and locked him outside his cabin overnight. Washington, now 30, recounted the events in an interview with the Washington Free Beacon and said his experience at the camp resulted in a 2003 lawsuit that ended two years later, when Washington says he and his family received a large financial settlement.
Here’s what happened:
Washington said the camp was his first extended trip away from his parents as a child, and his first time in such a rural environment. His mother sent the two children because they had recently moved from California to Baltimore and she hoped they would make friends in the area, according to Washington. Counselors were young, in their late teens or early 20s, and showed little interest in taking care of the campers, Washington said. As a punishment for wetting his bed, he said a counselor forced him to spend the next night sleeping outside by himself on the basketball court. “I’m like, ‘Hell no I’m not, it’s cold out there,’” he said. “[The counselors] wouldn’t let me in the house, not at all. … Shut the door to the cabin, locked it,” he said. “It was dark. There wasn’t nothing out there but the basketball court. I ain’t never experienced nothing like that. Like, you’re not in a tent, you’re not in nothing. You’re just out, God knows where.” Counselors also threw urine on him from a bucket they used when there wasn’t a bathroom nearby, he added. “I went through that experience myself. I don’t even like talking about this shit. That shit happened. … It was like in a bucket. They would keep that shit in a bucket,” he said. Washington said he saw counselors “grab kids,” but didn’t know the extent of abuse at the camp or whether others had experiences similar to his. “I just knew that shit happened to me, and that’s what I was worried about, me and my sister,” he said. Campers were prohibited from calling their parents, he said. When he was finally able to tell his mother what happened, she was furious at the camp. “I can hear her in there, screaming at them,” Washington said. “Next thing I knew, my mother was going to court. … I thank my mother for doing what she did. She is a life saver.” The family eventually received a financial settlement in the case, said Washington.
When the camp was investigated, Warnock was arrested for interfering with counselor interviews by police:
At least three state agencies—the Maryland State Police, the Department of Social Services, and the Department of Health—looked into allegations of child abuse at the camp between 2002 and 2003, according to government records obtained by the Free Beacon. Warnock was arrested at Camp Farthest Out on July 31, 2002, after a Maryland state trooper said he repeatedly disrupted her interviews with counselors while she was investigating allegations of child abuse. Warnock and another reverend were charged with “hindering and obstructing” police, but the charges were later dropped by the state prosecutor. When inspectors from the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene visited Camp Farthest Out in 2002, they also found multiple health and safety violations. “Staff are not supervising campers,” wrote a health inspector in a July 31, 2002, report. “Conversations w/ medical staff & pool staff indicate that this is routine among the counselors. It was observed during inspection today.” In June 2003, the Department of Health denied Camp Farthest Out’s certificate to operate a youth camp. One reason for the denial, according to the records, was that the camp failed to report at least five findings of child abuse levied against its director, Brian Carter, by the Department of Social Services.
Washington didn’t realize Warnock was running for Senate, and had this to say when he found out:
Washington expressed surprise when he was told Warnock is currently running for U.S. Senate in Georgia. “I don’t think nobody like [Warnock] should be running for damn Senate nowhere, running a camp like that,” he told the Free Beacon. “He should not be running for government.”
From his mouth to the ears of all Georgia voters.
Warnock’s former wife said, after he ran over her foot, that all Warnock cares about is his reputation. His interfering with interviews and subsequent arrest would seem to validate her statement. Guy sounds like a real scumbag.


thelibertydaily--2020-12-29--‘Christian Nationalism’ Is the Left’s Latest Weapon for Excluding 74 Million Americans From the Publ

‘Christian Nationalism’ Is the Left’s Latest Weapon for Excluding 74 Million Americans From the Public Square

If it seems that you have been hearing or reading the term “ Christian Nationalism , ” or one of its obscure variants like “ Christian Dominionist , ” a lot more often recently , it ’ s because you have .
Case in point : Former National Review staff writer David French claimed in the December 20 edition of The Dispatch that white evangelicals are being seduced by a virulent kind of “ Christian Nationalism ” that “ will always minimize America ’ s historic sins and the present legacy ( and reality ) of American racism.
” Exhibit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tellingly headlined “ Why Do They Hate Us ” — was a recent survey from the University of Virginia ’ s Institute for Advanced Studies in Culture entitled “ Democracy for Dark Times.
” Dark Times found , for example , that 78 percent of Black Americans interviewed for the survey favor reparations in compensation for their ancestors ’ suffering under Southern slavery .
French is appalled that only seven percent of white evangelicals favor reparations .
French claims the problem here is not the widespread support among evangelicals for President Donald Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not talking primarily about Donald Trump .
Support for the president is a symptom , not the disease .
Instead , I ’ m talking about race , immigration , history , and the vast and growing gulf between white Evangelicals and the rest of the United States on issues that dominate so many American hearts.
” For French then , “ Christian Nationalism ” essentially is just another way of saying white evangelicals , who make up about a fourth of the American voting population , are bigots and racists .
Another @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anybody ?
In identifying white racism with Christian Nationalism — a tiny , obscure group of folks influenced by , among others , the late Reformed theologian R.J. Rushdoony — French , intentionally or not , is following the lead of numerous voices on the Left .
Similarly , earlier this year , Drew Strait reviewed for Christianity Today the recently published tome by Andrew L. Whitehead and Samuel L. Perry , “ Taking America Back for God : Christian Nationalism in the United States.
” Strait all but declares the authors ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , for example , the authors ’ definition of Christian Nationalism as “ a cultural framework — a collection of myths , traditions , symbols , narratives , and value systems — that idealizes and advocates a fusion of Christianity with American civic life … the ‘ Christianity ’ of Christian nationalism represents something more than religion .
“ As we will show , it includes assumptions of nativism , white supremacy , patriarchy , and heteronormativity , along with divine sanction for authoritarian control and militarism .
It is as ethnic and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that last graph sounds familiar , it should because it encapsulates the Black Lives Matter/Progressive Left ’ s view of America as a Western colonialist nation ruled by despotic hyper-patriotic white males , who oppress women , minorities “ of color ” and the poor , all for their own “ white privilege ” and benefit .
With such a definition , it ’ s no surprise that , as Strait puts it , the authors conclude , among much else along the same line , that , “ A much stronger predictor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sentiments , xenophobia , resistance to racial justice and the repudiation of women in politics is Christian nationalism.
” In other words , Trump didn ’ t call forth Christian Nationalism , it was the other way around .
And thus , Strait continues , the authors argue that “ Christian Nationalism has little to do with personal religiosity and everything to do with acquiring and leveraging political power around key issues like Islam , immigration , abortion/patriarchy , militarism , gun control and sacrificial allegiance to the flag … ” That ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conduct is of little concern to Christian Nationalists , you see .
How does all of this end up being a handy weapon in the Left ’ s drive to isolate , discredit and ultimately exile white evangelicals and those who vote along the same lines , which is to the 74 million populist Christian/Conservative Americans who supported Trump ?
Consider this : University of Vermont Associate Professor of Religion Ilyse R. Morganstein tweeted on June 2 , shortly after George Floyd ’ s horrendous death while in the custody of the Minneapolis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is the thing we ’ re all watching — it ’ s inextricable from the anti-Blackness murdering folks , it is baked into the state … ” That Morganstein is no fan of Trump was made clear the day before when she retweeted , along with a disapproving obscenity , a photo of Trump holding a Bible while standing in front of the historic St. John ’ s Church near the White House during the summer riots there .
In the BLM/Progressive Left “ woke ” consciousness , racism is the Original Sin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ must be obliterated .
White evangelicals and their Trump-voting allies are living , breathing manifestations .
Today , it ’ s the statutes being pulled down and forever removed from our sight .
They won ’ t stop with statutes .
Mark Tapscott is founder and editor of HillFaith , an apologetics ministry sharing the Gospel of Jesus Christ with congressional aides in the nation ’ s capital .

If it seems that you have been hearing or reading the term “Christian Nationalism,” or one of its obscure variants like “Christian Dominionist,” a lot more often recently, it’s because you have.
Case in point: Former National Review staff writer David French claimed in the December 20 edition of The Dispatch that white evangelicals are being seduced by a virulent kind of “Christian Nationalism” that “will always minimize America’s historic sins and the present legacy (and reality) of American racism.”
Exhibit A for French — whose post was tellingly headlined “Why Do They Hate Us” — was a recent survey from the University of Virginia’s Institute for Advanced Studies in Culture entitled “Democracy for Dark Times.”
Dark Times found, for example, that 78 percent of Black Americans interviewed for the survey favor reparations in compensation for their ancestors’ suffering under Southern slavery. French is appalled that only seven percent of white evangelicals favor reparations.
French claims the problem here is not the widespread support among evangelicals for President Donald Trump:
No, I’m not talking primarily about Donald Trump. Support for the president is a symptom, not the disease. Instead, I’m talking about race, immigration, history, and the vast and growing gulf between white Evangelicals and the rest of the United States on issues that dominate so many American hearts.
For French then, “Christian Nationalism” essentially is just another way of saying white evangelicals, who make up about a fourth of the American voting population, are bigots and racists. Another heaping helping of critical race theory, anybody?
In identifying white racism with Christian Nationalism — a tiny, obscure group of folks influenced by, among others, the late Reformed theologian R.J. Rushdoony — French, intentionally or not, is following the lead of numerous voices on the Left.
Similarly, earlier this year, Drew Strait reviewed for Christianity Today the recently published tome by Andrew L. Whitehead and Samuel L. Perry, Taking America Back for God: Christian Nationalism in the United States. Strait all but declares the authors’ work to be inspired.
He notes, for example, the authors’ definition of Christian Nationalism as “a cultural framework — a collection of myths, traditions, symbols, narratives, and value systems — that idealizes and advocates a fusion of Christianity with American civic life … the ‘Christianity’ of Christian nationalism represents something more than religion.”
“As we will show,” he explains, “it includes assumptions of nativism, white supremacy, patriarchy, and heteronormativity, along with divine sanction for authoritarian control and militarism. It is as ethnic and political as it is religious.”
If that last graph sounds familiar, it should because it encapsulates the Black Lives Matter/Progressive Left’s view of America as a Western colonialist nation ruled by despotic hyper-patriotic white males, who oppress women, minorities “of color” and the poor, all for their own “white privilege” and benefit.
With such a definition, it’s no surprise that, as Strait puts it, the authors conclude, among much else along the same line, that, “A much stronger predictor for the rise of Trumpism, anti-black sentiments, xenophobia, resistance to racial justice and the repudiation of women in politics is Christian nationalism.” In other words, Trump didn’t call forth Christian Nationalism, it was the other way around.
And thus, Strait continues, the authors argue that “Christian Nationalism has little to do with personal religiosity and everything to do with acquiring and leveraging political power around key issues like Islam, immigration, abortion/patriarchy, militarism, gun control and sacrificial allegiance to the flag …” That’s why Trump’s infamous personal conduct is of little concern to Christian Nationalists, you see.
How does all of this end up being a handy weapon in the Left’s drive to isolate, discredit and ultimately exile white evangelicals and those who vote along the same lines, which is to say the 74 million populist Christian/Conservative Americans who supported Trump?
Consider this: University of Vermont Associate Professor of Religion Ilyse R. Morganstein tweeted on June 2, shortly after George Floyd’s horrendous death while in the custody of the Minneapolis Police Department: “White Christian Nationalism is the thing we’re all watching — it’s inextricable from the anti-Blackness murdering folks, it is baked into the state …”
That Morganstein is no fan of Trump was made clear the day before when she retweeted, along with a disapproving obscenity, a photo of Trump holding a Bible while standing in front of the historic St. John’s Church near the White House during the summer riots there.
In the BLM/Progressive Left “woke” consciousness, racism is the Original Sin of America and all manifestations of it must be obliterated. White evangelicals and their Trump-voting allies are living, breathing manifestations. Today, it’s the statutes being pulled down and forever removed from our sight. They won’t stop with statutes.
Mark Tapscott is founder and editor of HillFaith, an apologetics ministry sharing the Gospel of Jesus Christ with congressional aides in the nation’s capital.


thelibertydaily--2020-12-29--The Loony Left Thinks Teens Should Have a Lot of Rights and No Responsibility

It ’ s tough to overcome the cognitive dissonance on the radical left .
Their policy positions rarely fit together in a cohesive package that makes sense .
Here is another glaring example .
In Cook County , Chief Judge Timothy Evans has decided it is time to create a whole new juvenile class of citizen : those who are accused of crimes between the age of 18 and 26 .
Evans is calling for a “ Young Adult Court ” and give the following justification : This new court has become necessary and needs to be distinguished from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ individuals in the emerging adults category have reached the chronological age of 18 , the age traditionally considered to be the age of consent and adulthood and therefore no longer considered juveniles , but an age generally considered to be one when the brain is not fully developed and mature .
Emerging adults have not fully developed that part of the brain known as the pre-frontal cortex , which is that part of the brain that controls cognitive thought and planning , as well as emotional responses to stress .
The pre-frontal cortex @ @ @ @ @ @ @ closer to the age of 26 .
Like juveniles , who also lack a fully developed pre-frontal cortex , emerging adults are often sensation seekers who are easily led astray and frequently act without first considering the consequences of their actions .
While compassion and criminal justice need to have some intersection , making excuses for adults up to an age where they should be functional members of society is a dangerous bar to lower .
If you introduce me to a 25-year-old who does not understand stealing is wrong or could be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suggest cognitive testing .
There is something wrong .
However , I am willing to grant Judge Evans ’ s premise if he will have a conversation with people like the California Assembly and Representative Ayanna Pressley .
Certainly , we don ’ t need children as young as 16 years old voting in federal elections if we can ’ t trust those in their early 20s to know right from wrong .
In Evans ’ s own words , these children with even less pre-frontal cortex development will be unable to understand @ @ @ @ @ @ @ easily led .
Of course , we know this is exactly why the radical left wants them to vote .
People with underdeveloped cognitive thought and planning abilities believe in ridiculous fairy tales like the Green New Deal .
Still , if Evans gets his way , we should be raising the voting age from 18 to something closer to the age a child gets kicked off Obamacare .
And we really need him to talk to the geniuses at the World Economic Forum .
The founder and executive chairman Klaus Schwab took @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the weather to ramp up his idea for stakeholder capitalism to usher in The Great Reset .
He calls it the “ Greta Thunberg Effect ” : As the parent of a few Gen Zs with 401ks , I can assure you they value a company that cares about shareholder value .
They are also huge fans of cheap gas .
If you have a Greta , throw her a copy of Michael Shellenberger ’ s Apocalypse Never so she can calm down .
This is why we don ’ t take advice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ young to have a stake in it .
If we can ’ t trust young adults as old as 25 to regulate their behavior , we certainly can ’ t trust them with “ reimagining ” global capitalism .
Or in selecting leaders to implement policies that are economically viable and rational .
The radical left really need to make up their minds .
Because according to Judge Evans when it comes to people under the age of 25 the science is settled .
They can ’ t even reliably regulate their own @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be regulating anyone else ’ s .
Fauci Admits He ’ s Been ‘ Deliberately ’ Moving the COVID-19 Goalposts—Partly Based on His Gut

It’s tough to overcome the cognitive dissonance on the radical left. Their policy positions rarely fit together in a cohesive package that makes sense. Here is another glaring example. In Cook County, Ill., Chief Judge Timothy Evans has decided it is time to create a whole new juvenile class of citizens: those who are accused of crimes between the ages of 18 and 26.
Evans is calling for a “Young Adult Court” and gives the following justification:
This new court has become necessary and needs to be distinguished from the other two traditional courts, because the individuals in the emerging adults category have reached the chronological age of 18, the age traditionally considered to be the age of consent and adulthood and therefore no longer considered juveniles, but an age generally considered to be one when the brain is not fully developed and mature. Emerging adults have not fully developed that part of the brain known as the pre-frontal cortex, which is that part of the brain that controls cognitive thought and planning, as well as emotional responses to stress. The pre-frontal cortex generally continues to develop until one is closer to the age of 26. Like juveniles, who also lack a fully developed pre-frontal cortex, emerging adults are often sensation seekers who are easily led astray and frequently act without first considering the consequences of their actions.
While compassion and criminal justice need to have some intersection, making excuses for adults up to an age where they should be functional members of society is a dangerous bar to lower. If you introduce me to a 25-year-old who does not understand that stealing is wrong, or could be led into doing it, I would suggest cognitive testing. There is something wrong.
However, I am willing to consider Judge Evans’s premise if he will have conversations with people like those in the California Assembly and Representative Ayanna Pressley, who want to lower the voting age. Certainly, we don’t need children as young as 16 years old voting in federal elections if we can’t trust those in their early 20s to know right from wrong.
In Evans’s own words, these children, with even less pre-frontal cortex development, will be unable to understand the consequences of their choices and are easily led. Of course, we know this is exactly why the radical left wants them to vote. People with underdeveloped cognitive thought and planning abilities believe in ridiculous fairy tales like the Green New Deal. Still, if Evans gets his way, we should be raising the voting age from 18 to something closer to the age a child gets kicked off Obamacare.
And we really need him to talk to the geniuses at the World Economic Forum. The founder and executive chairman, Klaus Schwab, took inspiration from the Swedish teen angry at the weather to ramp up his idea for stakeholder capitalism to usher in The Great Reset. He calls it the “Greta Thunberg Effect”:
One likely reason is the “Greta Thunberg” effect. The young Swedish climate activist has reminded us that adherence to the current economic system represents a betrayal of future generations, owing to its environmental unsustainability. Another (related) reason is that millennials and Generation Z no longer want to work for, invest in, or buy from companies that lack values beyond maximizing shareholder value.
As the parent of a few Gen Zs with 401ks, I can assure you they value a company that cares about shareholder value. They are also huge fans of cheap gas. If you have a Greta, throw her a copy of Michael Shellenberger’s Apocalypse Never so she can calm down. This is why we don’t take advice about the global economy from children too young to have a stake in it.
If we can’t trust young adults as old as 25 to regulate their behavior, we certainly can’t trust them with “reimagining” global capitalism or selecting leaders to implement policies that are economically viable and rational. The radical left really needs to make up their mind, because according to Judge Evans, when it comes to people under the age of 25, the science is settled. They can’t even reliably regulate their own behavior. They certainly shouldn’t be regulating anyone else’s.


thelibertydaily--2020-12-29--Expecting a Joe Biden Presidency, Democrats Plan To Rapidly Increase the Slaughter of Innocent Babie

Expecting a Joe Biden Presidency, Democrats Plan To Rapidly Increase the Slaughter of Innocent Babies

Democrats are working to ramp up taxpayer-funded abortions if Joe Biden gets installed as president .
Democratic Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut , who ’ s set to chair the House Appropriations Committee in January , vowed to eliminate the Hyde Amendment , which bans federal funding for abortions .
“ This is the last year , ” DeLauro said at a Dec. 8 hearing of the House Appropriations Committee .
She insisted that the government should pay for the murders of unborn babies and that not doing so is “ discriminatory ” to minorities .
“ The Hyde Amendment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said .
TRENDING : Bill Gates To The Rescue : Sun-Dimming Plan to Save the Human Race Just Got The Go Ahead “ For more than 40 years , [ the Hyde Amendment ] has been routinely extended every year as a legislative rider , but the time has come in this current moment to reckon with the norm , with the status quo , view it through the lens of how it impacts communities of color … More than half , 58 percent , of the women affected by the Hyde Amendment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claimed that promoting easy , free access to abortions empowers women .
“ Now is the time to empower all women to make deeply personal life decisions without politicians inserting themselves into the doctor ’ s office , ” she said .
Republican Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama , who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee , said he will fight to block the Democrats ’ efforts to scrap Hyde .
“ The Republican caucus would resist it , ” Shelby told NBC News .
“ We ’ ve had the Hyde Amendment a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it ’ s pretty clearly embedded in the fabric of our legislation .
I support the Hyde Amendment.
” Conservative author and commentator Candace Owens has repeatedly slammed Democrats for cavalierly using the race card to champion mass abortions .
“ Murdering 800 black babies every single day is now considered ‘ healthcare , ' ” she tweeted .
Owens has also repeatedly pointed out that leftists who mindlessly screech “ black lives matter !
” hypocritically ignore that more blacks are murdered by abortion every year than are killed by “ racist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to appoint pro-abortion politicians to major positions in his administration if he gets installed in the White House .
But as a senator , he opposed abortion for decades and supported the Hyde Amendment .
However , Biden opportunistically flip-flopped in 2019 during the Democratic primary race in a bid to pander to the vocal , left-wing faction of his party .
He now endorses eliminating the Hyde Amendment and making taxpayer-funded abortion available on-demand and convenient .
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal .

Democrats are working to ramp up taxpayer-funded abortions if Joe Biden gets installed as president.
Democratic Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut, who’s set to chair the House Appropriations Committee in January, vowed to eliminate the Hyde Amendment, which bans federal funding for abortions.
“This is the last year,” DeLauro said at a Dec. 8 hearing of the House Appropriations Committee.
She insisted that the government should pay for the murders of unborn babies and that not doing so is “discriminatory” to minorities.
“The Hyde Amendment is a discriminatory policy,” she said.
“For more than 40 years, [the Hyde Amendment] has been routinely extended every year as a legislative rider, but the time has come in this current moment to reckon with the norm, with the status quo, view it through the lens of how it impacts communities of color … More than half, 58 percent, of the women affected by the Hyde Amendment are women of color.”
DeLauro further claimed that promoting easy, free access to abortions empowers women.
“Now is the time to empower all women to make deeply personal life decisions without politicians inserting themselves into the doctor’s office,” she said.
Republican Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama, who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee, said he will fight to block the Democrats’ efforts to scrap Hyde.
“The Republican caucus would resist it,” Shelby told NBC News. “We’ve had the Hyde Amendment a long time.
“And I think it’s pretty clearly embedded in the fabric of our legislation. I support the Hyde Amendment.”
Conservative author and commentator Candace Owens has repeatedly slammed Democrats for cavalierly using the race card to champion mass abortions.
“Murdering 800 black babies every single day is now considered ‘healthcare,'” she tweeted.
This just in: murdering 800 black babies every single day is now considered “healthcare”. https://t.co/vQ9PA6xzbz — Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) May 8, 2018
Owens has also repeatedly pointed out that leftists who mindlessly screech “black lives matter!” hypocritically ignore that more blacks are murdered by abortion every year than are killed by “racist” white cops.
Here is @RealCandaceO on abortion: * Black women represent 6-7% of the population but we account for 40% of the abortions
* In New York City more black babies are aborted than born alivepic.twitter.com/jvL5NTCNjm — LifeNews.com (@LifeNewsHQ) March 6, 2019
Dear Republicans: the next time Dems try to get you to say black lives matter, please say
“Black Lives Matter especially in the womb, and it’s a tragedy that in many cities more black children are being aborted than born alive thanks to Democrat policies” That’ll shut them up. https://t.co/hVhpHYus7l — Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) June 20, 2020
Biden has pledged to appoint pro-abortion politicians to major positions in his administration if he gets installed in the White House. But as a senator, he opposed abortion for decades and supported the Hyde Amendment.
However, Biden opportunistically flip-flopped in 2019 during the Democratic primary race in a bid to pander to the vocal, left-wing faction of his party.
He now endorses eliminating the Hyde Amendment and making taxpayer-funded abortion available on-demand and convenient.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.


thelibertydaily--2020-12-29--Dr. Scott Atlas Says America May Not Survive the Corruption, Incompetence and FRAUD Unleashed by the

Dr. Scott Atlas Says America May Not Survive the Corruption, Incompetence and FRAUD Unleashed by the COVID-19 Pandemic

( Natural News ) Besides his hawking of vaccines as the “ cure ” for the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) , Dr. Scott Atlas , who served as special adviser to the president from August through November , made some interesting points in a recent op-ed , published in The Wall Street Journal ( WSJ ) , about the demise of America due to lockdowns and other plandemic restrictions .
Thanks to the media ’ s relentless politicization of the crisis , most Americans are still stuck at home with dwindling resources and no apparent future .
Businesses are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ school as normal , and everything is falling apart – all for a virus with a nearly 100 percent survival rate .
It never had to be this way , Atlas suggests , but this is how it is .
And he wants people to know that , contrary to establishment rhetoric , the Trump administration is not to blame for the destruction of just about everything that our nation has held near and dear throughout its relatively short history .
“ No policy on any of these issues was set by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ property and employees , ” Atlas writes about the economic restrictions , stay-at-home orders , and mask mandates that still plague everyday American life , ” adding that “ all 50 states independently directed and implemented their own pandemic policies.
” Not only that , but individual states and local municipalities are also the ones responsible for continuing such policies in the face of evidence showing that they do not work .
Masks do not work , asymptomatic spread is not real , and keeping the economy closed is a much greater death @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and living as normal .
“ Governors in all but a few states – Florida and South Dakota are notable exceptions – imposed curfews , quarantines , directives on group gatherings , and mask mandates , ” Atlas notes , adding that “ cases ” are still “ surging ” in most places , supposedly , despite government intervention .
Data gathered by Gallup and YouGov suggests that somewhere between 80-90 percent of Americans have been faithfully wearing masks as decreed by their local governments , and yet COVID-19 is still spreading .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ actually one , and is contributing to the problem ?
The same goes for lockdowns , which not only were never proven to help but are actually now being shown to make it worse .
Why , then , are Americans still being told to stay at home ?
And even more importantly , why are Americans still obeying the government sociopaths that are telling them to do it ?
None of what is happening is constitutional , and all it would take to correct the tyranny is for a few good men @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The question is : Will they ?
“ For younger people , the lockdowns are so harmful , so deadly , there ’ s really no good justification , ” warned Stanford University ‘ s Jay Bhattacharya , who would seem to agree that the governments all across our nation are doing things wrong .
The healthiest solution to the crisis is to open everything back up and forget this nightmare ever happened .
Atlas is pushing vaccines as the gateway , just like Bill Gates is doing , but this writer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are not only harmful but unnecessary .
Try as “ they ” might to manipulate us all into taking them , President Donald Trump ’ s “ Operation Warp Speed ” vaccines are a no-go for anyone who has done his or her homework and come to the realization that mRNA reprogramming of DNA – you can learn more about mRNA technology at this link – is never a good idea , especially for a “ pandemic ” that is already over and done with .
More related news about the Wuhan coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pandemic.news .

Dr. Scott Atlas says America may not survive the corruption, incompetence and FRAUD unleashed by the COVID-19 pandemic
Besides his hawking of vaccines as the "cure" for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), Dr. Scott Atlas, who served as special adviser to the president from August through November, made some interesting points in a recent op-ed, published in(WSJ), about the demise of America due to lockdowns and otherrestrictions.
Thanks to the media's relentless politicization of the crisis, most Americans are still stuck at home with dwindling resources and no apparent future. Businesses are closed, children are prohibited from attending school as normal, and everything is falling apart – all for a virus with a nearly 100 percent survival rate.
It never had to be this way, Atlas suggests, but this is how it is. And he wants people to know that, contrary to establishment rhetoric, the Trump administration is not to blame for the destruction of just about everything that our nation has held near and dear throughout its relatively short history.
"No policy on any of these issues was set by the federal government, except those involving federal property and employees," Atlas writes about the economic restrictions, stay-at-home orders, and mask mandates that still plague everyday American life," adding that "all 50 states independently directed and implemented their own pandemic policies."
Not only that, but individual states and local municipalities are also the ones responsible for continuing such policies in the face of evidence showing that they do not work. Masks do not work, asymptomatic spread is not real, and keeping the economy closed is a much greater death sentence than just opening everything back up and living as normal.
"Governors in all but a few states – Florida and South Dakota are notable exceptions – imposed curfews, quarantines, directives on group gatherings, and mask mandates," Atlas notes, adding that "cases" are still "surging" in most places, supposedly, despite government intervention.
Open back up, America!
Data gathered by Gallup and YouGov suggests that somewhere between 80-90 percent of Americans have been faithfully wearing masks as decreed by their local governments, and yet COVID-19 is still spreading. Perhaps this "solution" is not actually one, and is contributing to the problem?
The same goes for lockdowns, which not only were never proven to help but are actually now being shown to make it worse. Why, then, are Americans still being told to stay at home? And even more importantly, why are Americans still obeying the government sociopaths that are telling them to do it?
None of what is happening is constitutional, and all it would take to correct the tyranny is for a few good men and women to do something about it. The question is: Will they?
"For younger people, the lockdowns are so harmful, so deadly, there's really no good justification," warned Stanford University's Jay Bhattacharya, who would seem to agree that the governments all across our nation are doing things wrong.
The healthiest solution to the crisis is to open everything back up and forget this nightmare ever happened. Atlas is pushing vaccines as the gateway, just like Bill Gates is doing, but this writer's perspective is that the vaccines are not only harmful but unnecessary.
Try as "they" might to manipulate us all into taking them, President Donald Trump's "Operation Warp Speed" vaccines are a no-go for anyone who has done his or her homework and come to the realization that mRNA reprogramming of DNA – you can learn more about mRNA technology at this link – is never a good idea, especially for a "pandemic" that is already over and done with.
More related news about the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) can be found at Pandemic.news.
Sources for this article include:
Archive.fo
NaturalNews.com
NaturalNews.com
Science.news
NaturalNews.com


thelibertydaily--2020-12-29--CDC Quietly Changes Chi-Com Virus Guidelines, Admits MASKS DON’T WORK!

The CDC quietly updated their guidelines to say that masks do n't work if you 've come into close contact with someone for 15 minutes or more , according to the CDC website .
The media is almost completely ignoring this fact .
According to the CDC , anyone who has symptoms or tests positive is a risk to others even if masks are worn .
According to the CDC update : '' Irrespective of whether the person with COVID-19 or the contact was wearing a mask . ''
?
?
?
?
So , what 's the point of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is now , what it has always been : Submission .
You do what they tell you or else they - and their useful idiot pals -- will make your life miserable .
Even though the mask serves no purpose , these dingbats and their useful idiots DEMAND you wear one .
This is n't about your health , it 's about CONTROL .
Slaves who do as they 're told and do not question the `` Massa '' ( Ya'sir massa ! )
are the ones wearing masks .
Free men are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
Now that you have read this story , please COVER THE COST for what your visit cost this site by clicking one or more of the ads below which generates Advertiser revenue of two to three cents per click - no purchase necessary by you -- and helps offset operating costs for this web site .
When YOU read a story here , the web hosting company charges us for `` data transfer / Bandwidth '' to convey the material to you .
Without your help by clicking an ad below , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of shut down from the data transfer charges .
Please click any ad below to offset the cost of bringing this news to you

World
CDC Quietly Changes COVID Guidelines to say MASKS DON'T WORK
The CDC quietly updated their guidelines to say that masks don't work if you've come into close contact with someone for 15 minutes or more, according to the CDC website.


thelibertydaily--2020-12-29--Nevada Secretary of State Caught Sending Voter Data List to Pakistani Firm Linked to ISI

This is just stunning !
Catherine Engelbrecht is the Founder and President of True The Vote the nation ’ s largest voters ’ rights group .
The organization for over ten years now has been on the front lines of election fraud prevention by building action-oriented election integrity movements in key states , counties , and precincts .
‘ True the Vote ’ does not advocate for particular parties or candidates only for fair elections at all levels .
In November True the Vote wrote the Nevada Secretary of State for the eligible voter list report .
When the Secretary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shocked to see that [ email protected ] was cc ’ ed .
TRENDING : EXCLUSIVE : Senator Kelly Loeffler to Gateway Pundit : On Jan. 6 , `` Nothing is Off the Table '' ( VIDEO ) Breitbart.com wrote about this earlier in the month .
True the Vote later wrote the Assistant Attorney General for National Security John C. Demers about the date breach .
The letter obtained exclusively by Breitbart News that when the email arrived , “ I was shocked to see the inclusion of another email address in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ employee at Kavtech is a strong supporter of the Pakistani ISI intelligence .
We reached out to True the Vote this morning and they told us their attorneys are advising them not to comment on this incident at this time .
The DOJ has this information .

UPDATE: True the Vote passed this information on to the FBI. True the Vote told The Gateway Pundit the email with the Pakistani firm Kavtech was first emailed to the Nevada Secretary of State in a True the Vote email for some reason. Then Nevada officials responded to True the Vote and Kavtech in their reply.
UPDATE: Turns out @TrueTheVote was itself contracting w/ the Pakistani firm in question. (@whbutt reached out to @RileySnyder re: his story on the allegation.) A True the Vote employee cc'd him – [email protected] – so when the @NVSOS did a *Reply All* w/voter info, there it was. https://t.co/imT7VnCp96 — E!! (@elizthompsn) January 24, 2021
Catherine Engelbrecht is the Founder and President of True The Vote the nation’s largest voters’ rights group.
The organization for over ten years now has been on the front lines of election fraud prevention by building action-oriented election integrity movements in key states, counties, and precincts. ‘True the Vote’ does not advocate for particular parties or candidates only for fair elections at all levels.
True the vote sent us this comment.


thelibertydaily--2020-12-29--Rep. Louie Gohmert, Group of Republicans Sue Pence in Last-Ditch Effort to Overturn Fraudulent Elect

Rep. Louie Gohmert, Group of Republicans Sue Pence in Last-Ditch Effort to Overturn Fraudulent Election

Republican Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert and a group of other GOP figures filed a lawsuit Sunday against Vice President Mike Pence in an effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election .
The lawsuit focuses on Pence , who will oversee the upcoming Jan. 6 meeting of Congress to count states ’ electoral votes and finalize President-elect Joe Biden ’ s victory over President Donald Trump , according to The Hill .
“ The 2020 presidential election was one we ’ d expect to see in a banana republic , not the United States of America .
In fact , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ place were so egregious that seven contested states– Arizona , Georgia , Michigan , New Mexico , Nevada , Pennsylvania , and Wisconsin all sent dueling slates of electors to Congress , ” Gohmert said in a statement .
“ This puts Vice President Mike Pence in a position where some argue he has to choose between morality and the law .
That is not the case , ” Gohmert continued .
The group filed the lawsuit against Pence in his capacity as vice president in a federal Texas court .
The lawsuit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump ’ s losses in battleground states .
( RELATED : ‘ We Need New Leadership ’ — Ocasio-Cortez Blasts Pelosi , Schumer ) Along with Gohmert and Arizona Republican Party Chairwoman Kelli Ward , Students for Trump COO Tyler Bowyer , Arizona Republican Party Executive Director Greg Safsten and Maricopa County Republicans Second Vice Chair Nancy Cottle are asking federal Judge Jeremy Kernodle to let Pence declare who the electors are on Jan. 6 , according to The Daily Beast .
( RELATED : Top Senate Dem Slams Pelosi Over Delays On @ @ @ @ @ @ @ office referred the Daily Caller to the Congressman ’ s statement when asked about the lawsuit .

Republican Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert and a group of other GOP figures filed a lawsuit Sunday against Vice President Mike Pence in an effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
The lawsuit focuses on Pence, who will oversee the upcoming Jan. 6 meeting of Congress to count states’ electoral votes and finalize President-elect Joe Biden’s victory over President Donald Trump, according to The Hill.
“The 2020 presidential election was one we’d expect to see in a banana republic, not the United States of America. In fact, the rampant fraud and unconstitutional actions that took place were so egregious that seven contested states– Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, New Mexico, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin all sent dueling slates of electors to Congress,” Gohmert said in a statement.
“This puts Vice President Mike Pence in a position where some argue he has to choose between morality and the law. That is not the case,” Gohmert continued.
READ THE FULL LAWSUIT HERE:
Gohmert v Pence lawsuit by Henry Rodgers on Scribd
The group filed the lawsuit against Pence in his capacity as vice president in a federal Texas court. The lawsuit reportedly asks for the judge to overturn Trump’s losses in battleground states. (RELATED: ‘We Need New Leadership’ — Ocasio-Cortez Blasts Pelosi, Schumer)
Along with Gohmert and Arizona Republican Party Chairwoman Kelli Ward, Students for Trump COO Tyler Bowyer, Arizona Republican Party Executive Director Greg Safsten and Maricopa County Republicans Second Vice Chair Nancy Cottle are asking federal Judge Jeremy Kernodle to let Pence declare who the electors are on Jan. 6, according to The Daily Beast. (RELATED: Top Senate Dem Slams Pelosi Over Delays On COVID-19 Relief Deal)
Gohmert’s office referred the Daily Caller to the Congressman’s statement when asked about the lawsuit.