thelibertydaily--2020-08-13--The Democrat Party is Getting Rid of the Jews

Kamala Harris , who defended Omar ’ s Jew-hate , could sit in the Oval Office .
Daniel Greenfield , a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center , is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism .
The Democrat primaries are sweeping around the nation and leaving behind fewer Jewish Democrats in public office and more antisemitic radicals sitting in the House of Representatives .
Rep. Ilhan Omar and Rep. Rashida Tlaib both survived challenges from better qualified African-Americans because they enjoyed the backing of the Democrat establishment .
Despite her antisemitic rhetoric @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the primary , she got the endorsement of Speaker Pelosi .
The top elected Democrat official also endorsed Tlaib .
After Omar ’ s first round of antisemitic remarks , Senator Kamala Harris defended the racist politician against her Jewish critics by warning “ that the spotlight being put on Congresswoman Omar may put her at risk.
” Omar ’ s antisemitism wasn ’ t threatening Jews , but Jewish protests were threatening the bigot .
Then Harris insisted that , “ there is a difference between criticism of policy ... and anti-Semitism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t bother to explain how Omar ’ s antisemitic tropes were mere policy .
Senator Harris has since been picked as Biden ’ s running mate .
If Biden wins , a politician who defended Omar ’ s antisemitism will almost certainly become the next president of this country .
While Harris has been depicted as a moderate , her chief of staff , Karine Jean-Pierre , was the national spokeswoman and senior adviser for MoveOn .
The radical group has a long history of trafficking in antisemism and attacking the Jewish State @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , in its own words , “ our country doesn ’ t need another Joe Lieberman.
” Jean-Pierre had accused Israel of `` war crimes '' and denounced AIPAC as `` Islamophobic '' for opposing the murder of Jews , urging Democrats to avoid the pro-Israel convention .
The myth that the radicals of the squad were insurgent “ giant-slayers ” who were taking on the Democrat establishment was branding .
The reality is that the radicals are backed by a radical establishment which is cheerfully shedding older Dems with more traditional constituencies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ squad leader who supported Omar ’ s pro-BDS resolution , has a speaking slot at the Democrat convention .
A letter on her site , signed by the congresswoman , accuses Israel of becoming an apartheid state and threatens to cut off aid .
Rep. Cortez 's email in support of the move touted the backing of BDS groups and extremist organizations linked to terrorist groups like the PFLP and Hamas .
These groups include American Muslims for Palestine , whose chairman , Hatem Bazian was the architect of the harassment of Jews @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Students for Justice in Palestine .
When Israel resisted a Hamas invasion from Gaza , Rep. Cortez accused Israel of a `` massacre '' .
Jewish Democrats can ’ t keep on pretending that these views are marginal when they occupy a speaking role at their convention between John Kerry and Bill Clinton .
All this matters a whole lot more than the policy theater over the Democrat platform .
What ’ s at stake for Jewish Democrats is not just policy : it ’ s representation .
The number of Protestants and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an inevitable consequence of secularization and diversity .
The DNC 's parade of speeches will open with Senator Bernie Sanders , an atheist with a Brooklyn accent who isn ’ t part of a Jewish community .
And he ’ s the prototype for the new type of “ Jewish ” Democrat .
Jewish House Democrats who represented Jewish constituencies are losing their seats .
The 117th Congress will have only two Jewish House Democrats from New York after Rep. Elliot Engel was defeated and Rep. Nita Lowey was replaced by minority radicals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jersey ’ s lone Jewish congressman survived an assault by a Cortez/Sanders backed radical .
How is it possible that the largest Jewish population in the country has so few Jewish House members ?
Democrats have strategically gerrymandered New York City to deny representation to Jewish areas by rolling them into minority areas where only the radicals can win .
Jewish Democrats used to hold public office because they were elected by Jewish voters .
That ’ s no longer true in New York .
It ’ s still true in Florida and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for long .
The new “ Jewish ” Democrat is a radical activist who has no ties to the Jewish community .
He or she may not even be Jewish .
Rep. Cortez has claimed that she has Jewish roots because “ to be Puerto Rican is to be the descendant of : African Moors & slaves , Taino Indians , Spanish colonizers , Jewish refugees , and likely others.
” Then who needs actual Jews anyway ?
The radical hijackers of the Democrats have been playing this game for a while .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ thing to a Jew that has ever sat in this office , '' Obama had insisted .
As Senator Kamala Harris hits the campaign trail , look for her to tout her Jewish husband , and to endlessly retell the same story about her mother-in-law .
Politics is built on lame ethnic pandering , but these tired routines are obscuring something much more deeply disturbing .
Obama and Harris both signed off on Iran ’ s nuclear program and the flow of money to terrorists .
And they ’ ve covered that disturbing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their Jewish friends .
Obama ’ s policies led to the murder of Jews .
He loved Jews so much he couldn ’ t stop killing them .
Senator Cory Booker thrilled Jewish Democrats with his ability to recite a few Hebrew phrases , and then worked hard to protect black nationalist terrorists who murdered Jews in his state .
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez claims to be Jewish because she ’ s Puerto Rican while coordinating with the allies of the terrorists who are killing Jews .
Meanwhile , Jewish voters are increasingly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Some of the largest traditional Jewish communities in the country are being represented by radicals like Rep. Yvette Clarke , Rep. Karen Bass , or Rep. Nydia Velasquez who are overtly hostile to Israel , and uninterested in actually representing Jews in their gerrymandered districts .
The relationship between Jewish communities and elected officials is being broken .
And that has implications well beyond Israel , BDS , or Iran .
It means that Jews are no longer a Democrat constituency .
That ’ s a reality that is quietly sinking in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ after the purge of Rep. Elliot Engel by a radical backed not only by AOC , but Obama .
According to Jamaal Bowman , Obama decided to endorse him after reading his response to a liberal Jewish clergyman rejecting his call to fight BDS and bashing Israel 's military .
Most Jewish Democrat voters are steadily refusing to pay attention to this phenomenon .
And yet there ’ s only so many rants about Trump , so many furious New York Times and Washington Post op-eds to be scrolled through at the breakfast @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of what a radicalized Democrat Party means for Jewish communities at bay .
It ’ s not just that the Democrats are turning against Israel , they ’ re turning against Jews .
Not Jews in the abstract sense .
Democrat politicians can , like Senator Cory Booker , keep a Hebrew copy of the Bible in their office , they can , like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez , claim Jewish roots , or , like Barack Obama , claim to be Jewish in some vague sense of values .
None of this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , their interests , communities , and lives , but it does a wonderful job of flattering the insecure neurosis that makes some Jews lean leftward .
Obama had won by reducing America to a set of leftist values .
He did the same thing to Jews .
But when you reduce people to your own abstractions and slogans , you ’ re appropriating them .
Marxists worshiped the working class as an abstraction and terrorized the actual working class .
Because they claimed to stand for “ the people ” , they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people .
The appropriation of the Jews transforms a people into a set of leftist slogans .
And then Democrats from Barack Obama to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez are free to support policies that lead to the murder of actual Jews in the name of their leftist abstractions of Jewish values .
The American political system doesn ’ t recognize constituencies as abstractions , but as people .
The Democrats are building a new one-party state in which elections are irrelevant and primaries exist to broker arrangements between intersectional non-profits funded by billionaires @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inconvenience in this Marxist political system .
Democrats with Jewish last names will still exist , they just won ’ t represent anyone except the roster of non-profits like Bend the Arc , J Street , Jewish Voice for Peace , Jews for Racial and Economic Justice or If Not Now , that are not only actively working to get Jews killed , but that don ’ t represent anyone except George Soros or Buffett ’ s son .
And attacking Soros for his radical extremism is the only thing that Democrats will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pattern ought to be a familiar one from how leftist regimes dealt with Jewish populations .
There ’ s not much of a future for Jewish communities in this model .
The cities and suburbs where Jews live are under siege in the name of social justice .
Jewish communities are simultaneously losing their representation within the Democrats in the name of social justice .
Jewish Democrats who imagine that Israel is the problem are about to learn they ’ re the problem .
The problem , as in the USSR , is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ filled with middle class professionals , two-parent families who raise their children to succeed , go to a good college , get an even better job , get married , and raise their own children in a suburb with safe streets , challenging schools , and the rest of what used to be the American Dream .
Like most suburbanites , they aren ’ t actually radical .
They just stupidly enable the radicals .
And the radicals , once they take power , are not going to tolerate them .
They ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It ’ s already happening .
And , unlike the 70s , there won ’ t be any suburbs to run away to .
A decade ago there were six Jewish House Democrats out of New York .
Now there are two .
What happened in the short span of a decade is that the radical future of the Democrats arrived .
And there ’ s no room in that radical new world that the Democrats are building for the Jews .

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.
The Democrat primaries are sweeping around the nation and leaving behind fewer Jewish Democrats in public office and more antisemitic radicals sitting in the House of Representatives.
Rep. Ilhan Omar and Rep. Rashida Tlaib both survived challenges from better qualified African-Americans because they enjoyed the backing of the Democrat establishment.
Despite her antisemitic rhetoric, a habit that Omar continued during the primary, she got the endorsement of Speaker Pelosi. The top elected Democrat official also endorsed Tlaib.
After Omar’s first round of antisemitic remarks, Senator Kamala Harris defended the racist politician against her Jewish critics by warning “that the spotlight being put on Congresswoman Omar may put her at risk.”
Omar’s antisemitism wasn’t threatening Jews, but Jewish protests were threatening the bigot.
Then Harris insisted that, “there is a difference between criticism of policy… and anti-Semitism.”
The California politician didn’t bother to explain how Omar’s antisemitic tropes were mere policy.
Senator Harris has since been picked as Biden’s running mate. If Biden wins, a politician who defended Omar’s antisemitism will almost certainly become the next president of this country.
While Harris has been depicted as a moderate, her chief of staff, Karine Jean-Pierre, was the national spokeswoman and senior adviser for MoveOn. The radical group has a long history of trafficking in antisemism and attacking the Jewish State. It even opposed Senator Schumer because, in its own words, “our country doesn’t need another Joe Lieberman.”
Jean-Pierre had accused Israel of “war crimes” and denounced AIPAC as “Islamophobic” for opposing the murder of Jews, urging Democrats to avoid the pro-Israel convention.
The myth that the radicals of the squad were insurgent “giant-slayers” who were taking on the Democrat establishment was branding. The reality is that the radicals are backed by a radical establishment which is cheerfully shedding older Dems with more traditional constituencies.
That includes Jews.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, the squad leader who supported Omar’s pro-BDS resolution, has a speaking slot at the Democrat convention. A letter on her site, signed by the congresswoman, accuses Israel of becoming an apartheid state and threatens to cut off aid.
Rep. Cortez’s email in support of the move touted the backing of BDS groups and extremist organizations linked to terrorist groups like the PFLP and Hamas. These groups include American Muslims for Palestine, whose chairman, Hatem Bazian was the architect of the harassment of Jews on college campuses as the founder of Students for Justice in Palestine.
When Israel resisted a Hamas invasion from Gaza, Rep. Cortez accused Israel of a “massacre”.
Jewish Democrats can’t keep on pretending that these views are marginal when they occupy a speaking role at their convention between John Kerry and Bill Clinton.
All this matters a whole lot more than the policy theater over the Democrat platform.
What’s at stake for Jewish Democrats is not just policy: it’s representation.
The number of Protestants and Jews has been dropping in Congress, an inevitable consequence of secularization and diversity. The DNC’s parade of speeches will open with Senator Bernie Sanders, an atheist with a Brooklyn accent who isn’t part of a Jewish community. And he’s the prototype for the new type of “Jewish” Democrat.
Jewish House Democrats who represented Jewish constituencies are losing their seats.
The 117th Congress will have only two Jewish House Democrats from New York after Rep. Elliot Engel was defeated and Rep. Nita Lowey was replaced by minority radicals backed by Sanders and Cortez. New Jersey’s lone Jewish congressman survived an assault by a Cortez/Sanders backed radical.
How is it possible that the largest Jewish population in the country has so few Jewish House members? Democrats have strategically gerrymandered New York City to deny representation to Jewish areas by rolling them into minority areas where only the radicals can win.
Jewish Democrats used to hold public office because they were elected by Jewish voters. That’s no longer true in New York. It’s still true in Florida and a few other states. But not for long.
The new “Jewish” Democrat is a radical activist who has no ties to the Jewish community. He or she may not even be Jewish. Rep. Cortez has claimed that she has Jewish roots because “to be Puerto Rican is to be the descendant of: African Moors & slaves, Taino Indians, Spanish colonizers, Jewish refugees, and likely others.” Then who needs actual Jews anyway?
The radical hijackers of the Democrats have been playing this game for a while.
“I think I am the closest thing to a Jew that has ever sat in this office,” Obama had insisted.
As Senator Kamala Harris hits the campaign trail, look for her to tout her Jewish husband, and to endlessly retell the same story about her mother-in-law. Politics is built on lame ethnic pandering, but these tired routines are obscuring something much more deeply disturbing.
Obama and Harris both signed off on Iran’s nuclear program and the flow of money to terrorists. And they’ve covered that disturbing fact over with happy talk about all their Jewish friends.
Obama’s policies led to the murder of Jews. He loved Jews so much he couldn’t stop killing them.
Senator Cory Booker thrilled Jewish Democrats with his ability to recite a few Hebrew phrases, and then worked hard to protect black nationalist terrorists who murdered Jews in his state.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez claims to be Jewish because she’s Puerto Rican while coordinating with the allies of the terrorists who are killing Jews.
Meanwhile, Jewish voters are increasingly not being represented at a communal level.
Some of the largest traditional Jewish communities in the country are being represented by radicals like Rep. Yvette Clarke, Rep. Karen Bass, or Rep. Nydia Velasquez who are overtly hostile to Israel, and uninterested in actually representing Jews in their gerrymandered districts.
The relationship between Jewish communities and elected officials is being broken. And that has implications well beyond Israel, BDS, or Iran. It means that Jews are no longer a Democrat constituency. That’s a reality that is quietly sinking in for many Jewish Democrat professionals, especially after the purge of Rep. Elliot Engel by a radical backed not only by AOC, but Obama.
According to Jamaal Bowman, Obama decided to endorse him after reading his response to a liberal Jewish clergyman rejecting his call to fight BDS and bashing Israel’s military.
Most Jewish Democrat voters are steadily refusing to pay attention to this phenomenon.
And yet there’s only so many rants about Trump, so many furious New York Times and Washington Post op-eds to be scrolled through at the breakfast table that can keep the ugly reality of what a radicalized Democrat Party means for Jewish communities at bay.
It’s not just that the Democrats are turning against Israel, they’re turning against Jews.
Not Jews in the abstract sense. Democrat politicians can, like Senator Cory Booker, keep a Hebrew copy of the Bible in their office, they can, like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, claim Jewish roots, or, like Barack Obama, claim to be Jewish in some vague sense of values.
None of this has anything to do with actual Jews, their interests, communities, and lives, but it does a wonderful job of flattering the insecure neurosis that makes some Jews lean leftward.
Obama had won by reducing America to a set of leftist values. He did the same thing to Jews. But when you reduce people to your own abstractions and slogans, you’re appropriating them. Marxists worshiped the working class as an abstraction and terrorized the actual working class. Because they claimed to stand for “the people”, they never had to pay attention to real people.
The appropriation of the Jews transforms a people into a set of leftist slogans. And then Democrats from Barack Obama to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez are free to support policies that lead to the murder of actual Jews in the name of their leftist abstractions of Jewish values.
The American political system doesn’t recognize constituencies as abstractions, but as people. The Democrats are building a new one-party state in which elections are irrelevant and primaries exist to broker arrangements between intersectional non-profits funded by billionaires. Actual Jewish communities are an annoying inconvenience in this Marxist political system.
Democrats with Jewish last names will still exist, they just won’t represent anyone except the roster of non-profits like Bend the Arc, J Street, Jewish Voice for Peace, Jews for Racial and Economic Justice or If Not Now, that are not only actively working to get Jews killed, but that don’t represent anyone except George Soros or Buffett’s son. And attacking Soros for his radical extremism is the only thing that Democrats will even recognize as antisemitism anymore.
The pattern ought to be a familiar one from how leftist regimes dealt with Jewish populations.
There’s not much of a future for Jewish communities in this model. The cities and suburbs where Jews live are under siege in the name of social justice. Jewish communities are simultaneously losing their representation within the Democrats in the name of social justice.
Jewish Democrats who imagine that Israel is the problem are about to learn they’re the problem.
The problem, as in the USSR, is that many Jewish communities are bourgeois enclaves filled with middle class professionals, two-parent families who raise their children to succeed, go to a good college, get an even better job, get married, and raise their own children in a suburb with safe streets, challenging schools, and the rest of what used to be the American Dream.
Like most suburbanites, they aren’t actually radical. They just stupidly enable the radicals. And the radicals, once they take power, are not going to tolerate them. They’re going to get rid of them. It’s already happening. And, unlike the 70s, there won’t be any suburbs to run away to.
A decade ago there were six Jewish House Democrats out of New York. Now there are two.
What happened in the short span of a decade is that the radical future of the Democrats arrived. And there’s no room in that radical new world that the Democrats are building for the Jews.


thelibertydaily--2020-08-13--Joe Biden Sexual Assault Victim Tara Reade: The Democrat Party ‘Has Become an Enabler to Sexual Pred

Joe Biden Sexual Assault Victim Tara Reade: The Democrat Party ‘Has Become an Enabler to Sexual Predators’

Now that Joe Biden has finally picked a VP , Ol ’ Whatsername , it ’ s time for Democrats to pretend again that they care about women .
All the same people who went after Sarah Palin in 2008 — “ She owns a tanning bed !
She consulted a witch doctor !
Her womb is a clown car !
” — will now spend the next three months scolding anybody who dares to criticize the female Democrat who will be the de facto president if Joe Biden survives long enough for America to vote him in .
If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ insane up until now , you ’ re not going to enjoy the next 83 days .
But if Biden somehow imagined that picking a woman was going to make us all forget about the credible accusations of sexual misconduct in his past , he ’ s wrong as usual .
Tara Reade isn ’ t going away , and she isn ’ t letting these bullying , power-hungry Dems intimidate her from speaking out .
In an exclusive interview with NewsBusters on Wednesday , Tara Reade , the woman who accused Joe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , spoke out about the selection of Kamala Harris as his vice presidential running mate .
Harris has previously said that Reade should be “ heard ” and that she believes other Biden accusers .
Reade told me : “ Journalists should be asking her pointedly why there was a smear campaign on me and why Kamala was so aggressive and assertive with [ then-Supreme Court nominee Brett ] Kavanaugh and here she knows there is a credible sexual assault accusation against Senator Biden… ” She cautioned , “ To approach sexual violence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dismissive to the survivors and dangerous to the victims .
It is the reason why survivors are afraid to come forward.
” Still , Reade concluded , “ The Democratic Party has become an enabler to sexual predators.
” The Chinese virus crisis has been a blessing in disguise for Biden because when he ’ s sitting in front of a webcam in his basement all day , he isn ’ t out on the campaign trail creeping on every woman and girl he can get his mitts on .
But his credible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ alone .
Now that he ’ s got a woman to run interference for him , I assume Kamala will be the one fielding any press questions about Tara Reade .
Ha ha ha , just kidding !
There won ’ t be any press questions about Tara Reade .
Reminding people about the credible accusation against Biden might dissuade people from voting for him , and none of these “ journalists ” want to be remembered as The Reporter Who Gave Us Trump ’ s Second Term .
Just like none of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden ’ s offer when just a year ago she hit him with “ I ’ m not saying you ’ re a racist , but you ’ re a racist ” during one of the debates .
She even had “ That Little Girl Was Me ” t-shirts printed up in advance to shame him !
It was a kill shot .
Yet she missed , and she ended up dropping out of the race three months before the Iowa caucuses .
Now , ol ’ Joe has rewarded her for it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elevate his one challenger who accused him of bigotry ?
This fellow has come up with the best explanation I ’ ve seen : Harris flamed out early , she ’ s not a good campaigner and freezes when confronted with a question she doesn ’ t want to answer , and she doesn ’ t bring anything to the table that Biden doesn ’ t have already .
Except for her main constituency : journos .
The journos love her .
Get ready for more of that .
Kamala and all the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have a Girls ’ Day Out for the next three months .
Tee-hee !
And all the while , they ’ ll pretend Tara Reade isn ’ t there .
They ’ ll pretend # MeToo and # TimesUp never happened , only to be abandoned the millisecond it threatened the Democratic Party .
They ’ ll pretend they care about anything except power .
SCATHING : ‘ If You Can ’ t Address One Woman With Integrity , How Can You Run a Country With It ?
’ 5 Things to Know @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kamala Harris

Now that Joe Biden has finally picked a VP, Ol’ Whatsername, it’s time for Democrats to pretend again that they care about women. All the same people who went after Sarah Palin in 2008 — “She owns a tanning bed! She consulted a witch doctor! Her womb is a clown car!” — will now spend the next three months scolding anybody who dares to criticize the female Democrat who will be the de facto president if Joe Biden survives long enough for America to vote him in. If you thought journalists and other liberals were insane up until now, you’re not going to enjoy the next 83 days.
But if Biden somehow imagined that picking a woman was going to make us all forget about the credible accusations of sexual misconduct in his past, he’s wrong as usual. Tara Reade isn’t going away, and she isn’t letting these bullying, power-hungry Dems intimidate her from speaking out.
Scott Whitlock, Newsbusters:
In an exclusive interview with NewsBusters on Wednesday, Tara Reade, the woman who accused Joe Biden of sexually assaulting her in 1993, spoke out about the selection of Kamala Harris as his vice presidential running mate. Harris has previously said that Reade should be “heard” and that she believes other Biden accusers. Reade told me: “Journalists should be asking her pointedly why there was a smear campaign on me and why Kamala was so aggressive and assertive with [then-Supreme Court nominee Brett] Kavanaugh and here she knows there is a credible sexual assault accusation against Senator Biden…” She cautioned, “To approach sexual violence as a partisan issue is not only dismissive to the survivors and dangerous to the victims. It is the reason why survivors are afraid to come forward.” Still, Reade concluded, “The Democratic Party has become an enabler to sexual predators.”
The COVID-19 Chinese virus crisis has been a blessing in disguise for Biden because when he’s sitting in front of a webcam in his basement all day, he isn’t out on the campaign trail creeping on every woman and girl he can get his mitts on. But his credible accusers just won’t leave him alone. Now that he’s got a woman to run interference for him, I assume Kamala will be the one fielding any press questions about Tara Reade.
Ha ha ha, just kidding! There won’t be any press questions about Tara Reade. Reminding people about the credible accusation against Biden might dissuade people from voting for him, and none of these “journalists” want to be remembered as The Reporter Who Gave Us Trump’s Second Term.
Just like none of them will ask Harris why she accepted Biden’s offer when just a year ago she hit him with “I’m not saying you’re a racist, but you’re a racist” during one of the debates.
There was a little girl in California who was bussed to school. That little girl was me. #DemDebate pic.twitter.com/XKm2xP1MDH — Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) June 28, 2019
She even had “That Little Girl Was Me” t-shirts printed up in advance to shame him! It was a kill shot. Yet she missed, and she ended up dropping out of the race three months before the Iowa caucuses. Now, ol’ Joe has rewarded her for it.
And why? Why would he elevate his one challenger who accused him of bigotry? This fellow has come up with the best explanation I’ve seen:
The Kamala pick does nothing electorally. She flopped before Iowa. The Bernie wing hates her. Biden is only the nominee in the first place because of his dominant performance with African-American voters. W*men were already voting Dem The constituency for this pick was journos https://t.co/3F9Im6hAkv — Confirmed Miscer (@ManDaveJobGood) August 12, 2020
Harris flamed out early, she’s not a good campaigner and freezes when confronted with a question she doesn’t want to answer, and she doesn’t bring anything to the table that Biden doesn’t have already. Except for her main constituency: journos. The journos love her.
Remember this?
We kind of forced @kamalaharris to try on this awesome oversized rainbow sequin jacket … She snapped it up. @alivitali perfectly named it as “the Mardi Gras Jacket” #2020 #SouthCarolina #CampaignFashionReport pic.twitter.com/2G0NFRkKL6 — Maeve Reston (@MaeveReston) February 16, 2019
Get ready for more of that. Kamala and all the Washington “journalists” are gonna have a Girls’ Day Out for the next three months. Tee-hee!
And all the while, they’ll pretend Tara Reade isn’t there. They’ll pretend #MeToo and #TimesUp never happened, only to be abandoned the millisecond it threatened the Democratic Party. They’ll pretend they care about anything except power.


thelibertydaily--2020-08-13--Democrat ‘Antifa’ Candidate Running for Portland Mayor Says of Rioters Attempting to Murder Cops: ‘I

Democrat ‘Antifa’ Candidate Running for Portland Mayor Says of Rioters Attempting to Murder Cops: ‘I Understand Why They’re Angry’

Sarah Iannarone , the self-described “ antifa ” candidate running against Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler , refused to condemn the violent antifa rioters attacking officers and threatening innocent bystanders on the streets of Portland .
KGW Channel 8 Straight Talk host Laural Porter gave Iannarone , a member of the Democratic Socialists of America ( DSA ) , a softball question , asking her to condemn the violence without denouncing the protests that give birth to nightly riots .
Even so , she could not bring herself to condemn the violence .
Porter noted that Police Chief Chuck Lovell wrote @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with Black Lives Matter protesters but denouncing the violence .
“ Police Chief Lovell is asking the community to denounce the late-night protests , the smaller group of protesters who are causing damage , setting fires , throwing bricks at officers .
He and other black community leaders and activists say it ’ s taking away from the Black Lives Matter message , ” Porter said .
“ He cited how people broke into the Justice Center , destroyed the first-floor interior , lit fires with people inside the building , there was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ individuals screwed the doors of the North Precinct building shut , barricaded entrances , lit fires with people inside.
” “ Nearby businesses , some owned by people of color , were damaged and looted .
Some protesters have shot off commercial-grade fireworks , and Wednesday night … we saw more fires set outside the East Precinct , ” Porter continued .
“ Do you denounce this kind of behavior , separate from the larger , more peaceful protests , Sarah ?
” “ They say an ounce of prevention is worth a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to go back prior to this uprising to work on the issues that are causing these folks to be angry in the streets , working on police accountability , ” she said .
“ And so I know that nobody controls a social movement , and the mayor really isn ’ t the person to quell popular protests.
” Hirono Adopts Antifa Tactics Against GOP Witness at Senate Hearing About Antifa The antifa candidate then did something astounding .
Even though Porter had distinguished between the protests and the riots , and asked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ added , “ But we need to understand these protests are an important part of a healthy democracy.
” Porter , incredulous , pressed again , “ But what about the criminal activity we ’ re seeing ?
Do you denounce that part of it ?
” “ But lighting fires with people inside the building ?
Would you denounce that part of it with lighting fires , arson with people inside buildings ?
” the host asked again .
After a delay , the socialist candidate responded , “ I ’ m @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I ’ m not the person doing the graffiti , I ’ m not here to tell people how to protest.
” Porter cut her off , “ But will you denounce it ?
So you won ’ t denounce it ?
” “ I don ’ t smash windows .
I clean up when things are unfairly targeted , but here ’ s what I have to say .
Their outrage at the police is valid and the problem of police brutality and executing black lives in the streets is more important @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the antifa candidate replied .
Yes , Iannarone dismissed the arson attacks that even Mayor Ted Wheeler — who had previously debased himself to defend the rioters — described as “ attempted murder ” as nothing more than “ petty vandalism.
” Antifa rioters in Portland have fired commercial-grade fireworks at police officers , shone lasers in their eyes to blind them , and attempted to barricade them in burning buildings , but this antifa candidate says all that is just “ petty vandalism.
” Returning to the violence , Porter asked , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ forward ?
How does this criminal activity we ’ re seeing late at night , this fringe group , not the large peaceful protests… How does that move the city closer to racial equity and racial justice , the kinds of reforms that the Black Lives Matter movement wants ?
” Rather than addressing this question , Iannarone attacked Porter , saying , “ Black Portland is not a monolith.
” Pressed again , the antifa candidate added , “ I don ’ t condone violence , but I ’ m also going @ @ @ @ @ @ @ focus stays on Black Lives Matter protests.
” Iannarone then accused Chief Lovell of using “ police brutality ” to silence the Black Lives Matter movement .
“ The police have not done a good job of policing the police and so for Chief Lovell to respond to protests about police brutality with more police brutality , it undermines what we ’ re trying to accomplish , ” the antifa candidate said .
“ We need Portland police deescalating , not declaring riots and then tear-gassing rioters and then beating them with batons @ @ @ @ @ @ @ night.
” Then she added this ominous statement : “ Peaceful protests , in my opinion , might not necessarily be moving the conversation forward.
” That led Porter to bring up Iannarone ’ s previous remarks to Playboy .
The self-described antifa candidate said , “ It ’ s important we use radical tactics.
” Porter asked , “ What radical tactics , specifically , are you talking about ?
Are you talking about some of the things we ’ re seeing in the streets ?
” Iannarone dodged .
Rather than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ goals as “ radical , ” in the style of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ( D-N.Y. ) .
“ What ’ s radical is defunding militarization and investing in food pantries .
What ’ s radical is stopping the militarization of our police force and making sure that our families have access to universal pre-K programs , ” the antifa candidate said .
“ These right-wing types call me an anarchist and a communist and a terrorist because they ’ re scared of progressives who stand up to bullies .
We ’ ve seen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are right-wing smears out here who try to make being anti-fascist something you should be against.
” “ It ’ s 2020 .
I don ’ t want our country turning into what we see on The Handmaid ’ s Tale , ” Iannarone said .
“ We have to stand up to white nationalists , we have to oppose racism.
” With this kind of rhetoric , Iannarone is claiming that her radical pro-abortion , anti-police , and socialist policies are hip , mainstream , and the natural antidote to the evil @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Republicans are just fascists in need of punching .
But the existence of police is not inherently fascist or oppressive , antifa rioters really are terrorizing the streets of Portland , and pro-lifers have nothing like The Handmaid ’ s Tale in mind .
Tragically , Iannarone ( like AOC ) represents the culmination of the left ’ s cultural and political activism over the last few decades — and it ’ s terrifying .
Violence , mayhem , and attempted murder are happening on the streets of Portland , and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ beating Ted Wheeler is even more radical than he is .
In fact , this antifa candidate tweeted , “ F**k you , Ted Wheeler.
” In November , Portlanders will get a choice between a mayor who covered for antifa violence for nearly two months before changing his tune , and a self-described antifa candidate who refuses to condemn attempted murder .
Only in Portland would Ted Wheeler be the saner option .
Tyler O ’ Neil is the author of Making Hate Pay : The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tyler2ONeil .
Portland Mayor Finally Admits Violent Riots Aren ’ t the Same as ‘ Peaceful Protests , ’ After 68 Nights No , Hillary Clinton Fans , Evangelicals Are Not Secretly Planning a ‘ Handmaid ’ s Tale ’ Future

Sarah Iannarone, the self-described “antifa” candidate running against Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler, refused to condemn the violent antifa rioters attacking officers and threatening innocent bystanders on the streets of Portland. KGW Channel 8 Straight Talk host Laural Porter gave Iannarone, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), a softball question, asking her to condemn the violence without denouncing the protests that give birth to nightly riots. Even so, she could not bring herself to condemn the violence.
Porter noted that Police Chief Chuck Lovell wrote a New York Times op-ed expressing sympathy with Black Lives Matter protesters but denouncing the violence.
“Police Chief Lovell is asking the community to denounce the late-night protests, the smaller group of protesters who are causing damage, setting fires, throwing bricks at officers. He and other black community leaders and activists say it’s taking away from the Black Lives Matter message,” Porter said. “He cited how people broke into the Justice Center, destroyed the first-floor interior, lit fires with people inside the building, there was looting and destruction. Another night, individuals screwed the doors of the North Precinct building shut, barricaded entrances, lit fires with people inside.”
“Nearby businesses, some owned by people of color, were damaged and looted. Some protesters have shot off commercial-grade fireworks, and Wednesday night … we saw more fires set outside the East Precinct,” Porter continued. “Do you denounce this kind of behavior, separate from the larger, more peaceful protests, Sarah?”
Iannarone dodged the question.
“They say an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. I would have to go back prior to this uprising to work on the issues that are causing these folks to be angry in the streets, working on police accountability,” she said. “And so I know that nobody controls a social movement, and the mayor really isn’t the person to quell popular protests.”
The antifa candidate then did something astounding. Even though Porter had distinguished between the protests and the riots, and asked Iannarone about the riots, the candidate added, “But we need to understand these protests are an important part of a healthy democracy.”
Porter, incredulous, pressed again, “But what about the criminal activity we’re seeing? Do you denounce that part of it?”
“I understand why they’re angry,” the antifa candidate replied.
“But lighting fires with people inside the building? Would you denounce that part of it with lighting fires, arson with people inside buildings?” the host asked again.
After a delay, the socialist candidate responded, “I’m not the person setting the fires, I’m not the person doing the graffiti, I’m not here to tell people how to protest.”
Porter cut her off, “But will you denounce it? So you won’t denounce it?”
“I don’t smash windows. I clean up when things are unfairly targeted, but here’s what I have to say. Their outrage at the police is valid and the problem of police brutality and executing black lives in the streets is more important than petty vandalism to me,” the antifa candidate replied.
Yes, Iannarone dismissed the arson attacks that even Mayor Ted Wheeler — who had previously debased himself to defend the rioters — described as “attempted murder” as nothing more than “petty vandalism.” Antifa rioters in Portland have fired commercial-grade fireworks at police officers, shone lasers in their eyes to blind them, and attempted to barricade them in burning buildings, but this antifa candidate says all that is just “petty vandalism.”
Returning to the violence, Porter asked, “How does that move the city forward? How does this criminal activity we’re seeing late at night, this fringe group, not the large peaceful protests… How does that move the city closer to racial equity and racial justice, the kinds of reforms that the Black Lives Matter movement wants?”
Rather than addressing this question, Iannarone attacked Porter, saying, “Black Portland is not a monolith.”
Pressed again, the antifa candidate added, “I don’t condone violence, but I’m also going to continue to make sure that our focus stays on Black Lives Matter protests.”
Iannarone then accused Chief Lovell of using “police brutality” to silence the Black Lives Matter movement.
“The police have not done a good job of policing the police and so for Chief Lovell to respond to protests about police brutality with more police brutality, it undermines what we’re trying to accomplish,” the antifa candidate said. “We need Portland police deescalating, not declaring riots and then tear-gassing rioters and then beating them with batons in the streets as we saw last night.”
Then she added this ominous statement: “Peaceful protests, in my opinion, might not necessarily be moving the conversation forward.”
That led Porter to bring up Iannarone’s previous remarks to Playboy. The self-described antifa candidate said, “It’s important we use radical tactics.”
Porter asked, “What radical tactics, specifically, are you talking about? Are you talking about some of the things we’re seeing in the streets?”
Iannarone dodged. Rather than discussing tactics, she defended her political goals as “radical,” in the style of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.).
“What’s radical is defunding militarization and investing in food pantries. What’s radical is stopping the militarization of our police force and making sure that our families have access to universal pre-K programs,” the antifa candidate said. “These right-wing types call me an anarchist and a communist and a terrorist because they’re scared of progressives who stand up to bullies. We’ve seen it again and again. And there are right-wing smears out here who try to make being anti-fascist something you should be against.”
“It’s 2020. I don’t want our country turning into what we see on The Handmaid’s Tale,” Iannarone said. “We have to stand up to white nationalists, we have to oppose racism.”
With this kind of rhetoric, Iannarone is claiming that her radical pro-abortion, anti-police, and socialist policies are hip, mainstream, and the natural antidote to the evil conservatives. To hear her tell it, Republicans are just fascists in need of punching. But the existence of police is not inherently fascist or oppressive, antifa rioters really are terrorizing the streets of Portland, and pro-lifers have nothing like The Handmaid’s Tale in mind.
Tragically, Iannarone (like AOC) represents the culmination of the left’s cultural and political activism over the last few decades — and it’s terrifying. Violence, mayhem, and attempted murder are happening on the streets of Portland, and the only candidate who has a chance of beating Ted Wheeler is even more radical than he is.
In fact, this antifa candidate tweeted, “F**k you, Ted Wheeler.” In November, Portlanders will get a choice between a mayor who covered for antifa violence for nearly two months before changing his tune, and a self-described antifa candidate who refuses to condemn attempted murder. Only in Portland would Ted Wheeler be the saner option.
Tyler O’Neil is the author of Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center. Follow him on Twitter at @Tyler2ONeil.


thelibertydaily--2020-08-13--Biden-Harris Too Weak to Resist the Socialist Wing of Their Party

Democratic presidential candidate former Vice President Joe Biden 's running mate Sen. Kamala Harris ( D-Calif. ) speaks during an event at the Alexis Dupont High School in Wilmington , Del .
on Aug. 12 , 2020 .
( Drew Angerer/Getty Images ) Biden-Harris Too Weak to Resist the Socialist Wing of Their Party Joe Biden is no Henry Wallace—the 1948 Progressive Party candidate for president many thought was the first actual communist ( or close ) to run for the U.S. presidency .
Indeed , Joe is pretty much of a political cipher , his views waffling back and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ long career .
His more-important-than-usual running mate Kamala Harris is much the same way , though of shorter duration .
Nevertheless , election 2020 is going to be the first time in a long time , or possibly ever , that a U.S. presidential election is going to be about that ideological ultimatum—capitalism vs. socialism .
( Wallace was , after all , a third party candidate . )
The old saw about “ the most important election ever ” suddenly isn ’ t such a tired cliché .
This is due to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hostage by the growing socialist wing of the Democratic Party led by Bernie Sanders and “ The Squad , ” two of whose most extreme members—Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib—just won their primaries handily despite determined competition .
These far left-wingers are far more popular with their constituency than the nominees are with any constituency .
Joe and Kamala couldn ’ t win in November without these putatively democratic socialists , even if they wanted to—and it ’ s not faintly clear at this point they want to .
In fact , indications @ @ @ @ @ @ @ efforts of the New York Times and others to mollify the electorate by characterizing Biden as a “ moderate , ” he has made no attempt as yet to justify that .
No “ Sister Soljah ” moment appears to be on the horizon .
He barely even discusses the violence in our streets .
He hasn ’ t gone as far as the eye-rolling Jerry Nadler to say that Antifa is a myth , but he might as well have .
Part of the explanation for this is Biden is a fearful @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was , it will be remembered , afraid to go after Bin Laden lest the attempt misfire .
At this moment , he rarely comes out of his basement .
Better not to screw up .
By remaining silent , he gives his ascent to that violence in the streets that no doubt would increase under his administration , a new form of revolution based on race and gender rather than economics , tribalism really .
Meanwhile , Tucker Carlson has opined there are time-share salespeople more trustworthy than running mate Kamala , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of truth .
A more polite way of looking at her might be to reference Groucho Marx when , as Rufus T. Firefly , president of Freedonia in Duck Soup , he opined “ These are my principles .
And if you don ’ t like them , well… I ’ ve got others.
” Of course , Bernie and The Squad don ’ t have “ others.
” They know what their principles are—they ’ re very much sticking to them—and they aren ’ t the principles of a capitalist state .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ say the Biden and Harris don ’ t really have principles , less even than Groucho , not any that they deeply care about principles anyway , which makes them easy prey for those who do .
Gradually , or perhaps immediately , the left would get their way in Joe and Kamala ’ s administration , should they be elected .
It ’ s hard to see another scenario .
And then it will keep going further… and further… as such things do .
Which makes Election 2020 that “ most important @ @ @ @ @ @ @ capitalism if you happen to think , as I do , that it is vastly superior to socialism .
I won ’ t bore us all to death by pointing out the obvious , all the failures of socialism and communism , economic and otherwise , from Venezuela to the Great Leap Forward , how tens of millions have died for that particular cause .
Nor will I belabor , as Friedrich Hayek explained almost a century ago now , that socialism leads inexorably to totalitarian communism .
We have had a world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it comes to is this : Whether we like him or not , whether we see him as ironic or heroic or both , Donald Trump is now the defender of Adam Smith over Karl Marx .
He ’ s our last , best hope .
Sitting this one out or being a NeverTrumper , at this point , is a luxury none of us can afford .
Roger L. Simon is an award-winning author , Oscar-nominated screenwriter , co-founder of PJ Media , and now a columnist for The Epoch Times .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ rogerlsimon .
Buy his books on Amazon .
Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times .

Commentary
Joe Biden is no Henry Wallace—the 1948 Progressive Party candidate for president who many thought was the first actual communist (or close) to run for the U.S. presidency.
Indeed, Biden is pretty much of a political cipher, his views waffling back and forth with the political winds over his long career. His more-important-than-usual running mate, Kamala Harris, is much the same way, though of shorter duration.
Nevertheless, Election 2020 is going to be the first time in a long time, or possibly ever, that a U.S. presidential election is going to be about that ideological ultimatum—capitalism vs. socialism. (Wallace was, after all, a third-party candidate.)
The old saw about “the most important election ever” suddenly isn’t such a tired cliché.
This is due to the Biden–Harris duo being, in essence, held hostage by the growing socialist wing of the Democratic Party, led by Sen. Bernie Sanders (officially an independent who is accepted as a member of the party's Senate leadership) and “The Squad,” two of whose most extreme members—Reps. Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib—just won their primaries handily, despite determined competition. These far-left-wingers are far more popular with their constituency than the nominees are with any constituency.
Biden and Harris couldn’t win in November without these putatively democratic socialists, even if they wanted to—and it’s not faintly clear at this point that they want to.
In fact, indications are quite the opposite. Despite the efforts of The New York Times and others to mollify the electorate by characterizing Biden as a “moderate,” he's made no attempt as yet to justify that.
No “Sister Soljah” moment appears to be on the horizon. He barely even discusses the violence in our streets. He hasn’t gone as far as the eye-rolling Jerry Nadler to say that Antifa is a myth, but he might as well have.
Part of the explanation for this is that Biden is a fearful, cautious person by nature. He was, it will be remembered, afraid to go after Bin Laden lest the attempt misfire. At this moment, he rarely comes out of his basement. Better to not screw up.
By remaining silent, he gives his assent to that violence in the streets that no doubt would increase under his administration, a new form of revolution based on race and gender rather than economics—tribalism really.
Meanwhile, Tucker Carlson has opined there are timeshare salespeople more trustworthy than running mate Harris, a ruthless comment with an uncomfortable ring of truth.
A more polite way of looking at Harris might be to reference Groucho Marx when, as Rufus T. Firefly, president of Freedonia in the film "Duck Soup," he opined, “These are my principles. And if you don’t like them, well ... I’ve got others.”
Of course, Bernie and The Squad don’t have “others.” They know what their principles are—they’re very much sticking to them—and they aren’t the principles of a capitalist state.
I think it’s fair to say Biden and Harris don’t really have principles, less even than Groucho, not any that they deeply care about, anyway, which makes them easy prey for those who do.
Gradually, or perhaps immediately, the left would get their way in Biden and Harris’s administration, should they be elected. It’s hard to see another scenario. And then it will keep going further ... and further ... as such things do.
Which makes Election 2020 that “most important ever,” the last bastion of capitalism if you happen to think, as I do, that it's vastly superior to socialism.
I won’t bore us all to death by pointing out the obvious, all the failures of socialism and communism, economic and otherwise, from Venezuela to the Great Leap Forward, how tens of millions have died for that particular cause.
Nor will I belabor, as Friedrich Hayek explained almost a century ago now, that socialism leads inexorably to totalitarian communism. We have had a world full of examples since then.
What it comes to is this: Whether we like him or not, whether we see him as ironic or heroic or both, Donald Trump is now the defender of Adam Smith over Karl Marx. He’s our last, best hope.
Sitting this one out or being a NeverTrumper, at this point, is a luxury none of us can afford.
Roger L. Simon is an award-winning author, Oscar-nominated screenwriter, co-founder of PJ Media, and now a columnist for The Epoch Times. Find him on Twitter and Parler @rogerlsimon. Buy his books on Amazon.


thelibertydaily--2020-08-13--Peer-Reviewed Studies: Tumeric Protects Your Brain From Too Much Fluoride

The current study focused on fluoride-induced neurotoxicity and a process that leads to neuron death called excitotoxicity , which happens when overactive neurotransmitters damage or neurons ( brain cells ) .
The study identifies excitotoxicity and oxidative stress as the two main drivers of neurodegeneration , or the damage and death of our neurons .
People with the condition known as fluorosis , a mottling of tooth enamel caused by excessive exposure to fluoride during tooth development , have been found to also have neurodegenerative changes associated with a form of oxidative stress known as lipid peroxidation ( rancidity ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ effects of fluoride , it also cites evidence from other studies that point to benefits of fluoride use in appropriate amounts , including benefits for teeth and bones .
To achieve these benefits , it is important fluoride isn ’ t over-ingested .
Otherwise it can damage teeth and make bones more brittle .
The study was authored by researchers from the Department of Zoology , University College of Science , M.L .
Sukhadia University , Udaipur , India , who have spent the past decade investigating the mechanisms through which fluoride induces @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , particularly in cells of the hippocampus and cerebral cortex .
A compelling study was published in the Pharmacognosy Magazine titled , “ Curcumin attenuates neurotoxicity induced by fluoride : An in vivo evidence .
” The study adds experimental support to concerns that fluoride is indeed a brain-damaging substance , also revealing that a natural agent derived from turmeric can protect against health effects associated with this compound is available .
Lipids are one of the main components of cells .
Lipid peroxidation is oxidative damage .
It happens when free radicals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that make up cell membranes .
This process damages the cell .
Excess lipid peroxidation in the brain can lead to a decrease in total brain phospholipid content .
Owing to these well-known mechanisms of fluoride-associated neurotoxicity and neurodegeneration , the researchers identified the primary polyphenol in the spice turmeric—known as curcumin—as an ideal agent worth testing as a neuroprotective substance .
In short , they wanted to know if curcumin could protect our brains from damage that happens due to excessive levels of fluoride .
Previous research on curcumin indicates that it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in three distinct ways by protecting against 1 ) singlet oxygen , 2 ) hydroxyl radicals , and 3 ) superoxide radical damage .
Also , curcumin appears to raise endogenous glutathione production in the brain , a major antioxidant defense system .
In order to assess the neurotoxic effects of fluoride and prove curcumin ’ s protective role against it , researchers randomly divided up mice into four groups for 30 days : • Fluoride ( 120 ppm ) : fluoride was given in distilled water drinking water without restriction .
• @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) plus Curcumin : Oral dose of curcumin dissolved in olive oil along with fluoride in drinking water In order to ascertain the effect of treatment , the researchers measured the malondialdehyde ( MDA ) content in the brains of the different treated mice .
MDA is a well-known marker of oxidative stress/damage .
As was expected , the fluoride ( F ) only treatment group showed significantly elevated MDA levels vs. the non-fluoride treated control .
The fluoride plus curcumin group saw reduced MDA levels versus the fluoride-only group , demonstrating curcumin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ neurotoxicity .
The researchers concluded , “ Our study thus demonstrate that daily single dose of 120 ppm fluoride resulted in highly significant increases in the LPO [ lipid peroxidation , i.e .
brain rancidity ] as well as neurodegenerative changes in neuron cell bodies of selected hippocampal regions .
Supplementation with curcumin significantly reduced the toxic effect of fluoride to near normal level by augmenting the antioxidant defense through its scavenging property and provides evidence of having a therapeutic role against oxidative stress mediated neurodegeneration.
” This is far from the first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ brain-saving properties .
From the perspective of the primary research alone , there are more than 200 peer-reviewed published studies indicating that curcumin is a neuroprotective agent .
On GreenMedInfo ’ s turmeric database there are 115 articles proving turmeric protects the brain .
There are also two featured studies on turmeric ’ s ability to protect and restore the brain : How Turmeric Can Save the Aging Brain From Dementia and Premature Death , and Turmeric Produces ‘ Remarkable ’ Recovery in Alzheimer ’ s Patients .
Considering the many chemical insults @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the post-industrial world , turmeric may very well be the world ’ s most important herb , with more than 800 evidence-based health applications .
Visit GreenMedInfo ’ s Turmeric Research database—the world ’ s largest , open access turmeric resource of its kind—to view the first hand published research on the topic .
The GMI Research Group is dedicated to investigating the most important health and environmental issues of the day .
Special emphasis will be placed on environmental health .
Our focused and deep research will explore the many ways in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ body directly reflects the true state of the ambient environment .
This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of GreenMedInfo LLC .
Sign up for the newsletter .

A compelling study was published in the Pharmacognosy Magazine titled, “Curcumin attenuates neurotoxicity induced by fluoride: An in vivo evidence.” The study adds experimental support to concerns that fluoride is indeed a brain-damaging substance, also revealing that a natural agent derived from turmeric can protect against health effects associated with this compound is available. The study was authored by researchers from the Department of Zoology, University College of Science, M.L. Sukhadia University, Udaipur, India, who have spent the past decade investigating the mechanisms through which fluoride induces severe neurodegenerative changes in the mammalian brain, particularly in cells of the hippocampus and cerebral cortex. While the study focuses on negative effects of fluoride, it also cites evidence from other studies that point to benefits of fluoride use in appropriate amounts, including benefits for teeth and bones. To achieve these benefits, it is important fluoride isn’t over-ingested. Otherwise it can damage teeth and make bones more brittle. The current study focused on fluoride-induced neurotoxicity and a process that leads to neuron death called excitotoxicity, which happens when overactive neurotransmitters damage or neurons (brain cells). The study identifies excitotoxicity and oxidative stress as the two main drivers of neurodegeneration, or the damage and death of our neurons. People with the condition known as fluorosis, a mottling of tooth enamel caused by excessive exposure to fluoride during tooth development, have been found to also have neurodegenerative changes associated with a form of oxidative stress known as lipid peroxidation (rancidity).
Lipids are one of the main components of cells. Lipid peroxidation is oxidative damage. It happens when free radicals take electrons from certain lipids called phospholipids that make up cell membranes. This process damages the cell.


thelibertydaily--2020-08-14--CNN Fake News Reporter Jim Acosta Gaslights America, Outrageously Claims the Obama Regime Did Not Sp

CNN Fake News Reporter Jim Acosta Gaslights America, Outrageously Claims the Obama Regime Did Not Spy on the Trump Campaign [Which is Not in Dispute]

True story : We honestly thought this was an old clip of CNN ’ s Jim Acosta insisting that the @ @ @ @ @ the Trump campaign ; we mean , he ’ s obviously seen all the documentation @ @ @ @ @ Obama ’ s FBI using bogus documents to get FISA court approval to spy on @ @ @ @ @ But then we looked at the chyron on the clip and it says , “ @ @ @ @ @ as Running Mate , ” so this has to have aired on Tuesday … and @ @ @ @ @ News , Mr. President ” himself is still repeating this .
It ’ s nothing @ @ @ @ @ know : The mainstream media spent years covering the Trump campaign ’ s collusion with @ @ @ @ @ did , but Acosta flat-out denies that the Obama administration spied on the Trump campaign @ @ @ @ @ is low even for Acosta .

True story: We honestly thought this was an old clip of CNN’s Jim Acosta insisting that the Obama administration never spied on the Trump campaign; we mean, he’s obviously seen all the documentation we’ve seen of Obama’s FBI using bogus documents to get FISA court approval to spy on Trump adviser Carter Page. But then we looked at the chyron on the clip and it says, “Biden Picks Sen. Kamala Harris as Running Mate,” so this has to have aired on Tuesday … and Mr. “We Are Real News, Mr. President” himself is still repeating this.
It’s nothing you don’t already know: The mainstream media spent years covering the Trump campaign’s collusion with Russia and still insists he did, but Acosta flat-out denies that the Obama administration spied on the Trump campaign despite the evidence.
CNN’s @Acosta on Trump noting the Obama Admin spied on his campaign: "That is just not true. That did not happen, it has not been proven.” pic.twitter.com/3SaZoa4acs — Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) August 11, 2020
DoJ IG Michael Horowitz on “Crossfire Hurricane”: “It’s illegal surveillance, it’s not court-authorized surveillance.” — Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) August 11, 2020
It's incredible they keep dying on this hill. Trump was spied on, there's no real debate over that. https://t.co/pxaF3Jwwov — Mark Hemingway (@Heminator) August 13, 2020
He was. By the most corrupt administration ever… — Eventhedogsaboy (@Eventhedogsabo1) August 13, 2020
Denying the increasingly undeniable. The CNN way. — MorrisOcean1 (@morris_ocean1) August 13, 2020
They died on the JFK hill for decades. Obama is just the new Camelot. For the rest of my life we will have to hear the gauzy remembrance of hope and change. And nothing can sully it. — Mark Brown (@brownmp) August 13, 2020
Another example of why Acosta and CNN and no credibility. — J.J. ?? (@IMHObyJJ) August 13, 2020
They get up every morning, look into the mirror and practice this junk. Must be hard — sarah watson (@SatahWatson) August 13, 2020
It is fact at this point. The only question remaining is if anyone will be going to jail for it. — Michael Larson (@gunnarlarson23) August 13, 2020
But to admit it means that Trump was correct about something. That cannot be allowed but it might also shake their beliefs on how they view their own side. pic.twitter.com/jV3C6anUUg — Zubi (@BeardedGunny) August 13, 2020
He can’t even look into the camera when he says it. He knows he is lying. — Jana_Lightfoot (@jana_lightfoot) August 13, 2020
He sure don’t look at that camera very much while he is saying that. Lol. It’s just hard to blatantly look at that camera and lie I guess?♀ how can these people face themselves even? — mariawelt (@mariawelter6) August 13, 2020
They must protect the golden boy at all cost — Mark (@gilman1918) August 13, 2020
Durham needs to get his ass in gear or this will be a daily talking point. — Tom Johnson (@FarmerTom10) August 13, 2020
Agreed. Time’s running out.
Anyone in the media that is still covering for this crime was an active participant in carrying it out. That is my opinion. #Spygate — Just a girl following politics (@AmErIcAn_0922) August 13, 2020
Since newer dark haired Jim Acosta says it, it must be 100% true ? — CConstantine B (@constantine4179) August 13, 2020
Acosta’s lack of integrity is nothing short of supernatural. It continues to astound and mystify me. — Cinde Watson (@cindewatson) August 13, 2020
Jim Acosta is a lying sack of shit. — Antonio Martinez (@djtechchicago) August 13, 2020
So who made him say that? Because he knows it's not true. — AshesToAshas (@AshesTo19570185) August 12, 2020
It hasn’t been proven, Jim??? You certain about that? I guess all the hearings @LindseyGrahamSC is holding are preliminary? — The Scotts the Limit (@ScottPage1) August 12, 2020
If the hearings don't air on CNN, they never happened. — Miss Austen (@kathoneil27) August 12, 2020
Another lie from Acosta. Shocking. Notice he can’t even look directly at the camera. — USA (@RedWhiteBlue4vr) August 12, 2020
I noticed he couldn’t keep eye contact with the camera when he was speaking the untruth. He knows! — TruthSeeker (@SoulPostings) August 12, 2020
.@Acosta, I know @CNN pays you a bunch of money to read their scripts. Sounds like a cush job. I'm just wondering if you really believe what you read? I guess it's pretty easy to sleep at night with all the bucks in the bank, but it's doesn't show much integrity. — Rob (Big Swingin' Bob of the Appalachians) (@rlindsey) August 12, 2020
Baghdad Bob did it better? pic.twitter.com/KOL5lDwb5a — ??Pray for Peace?? (@Fear_Not_Ever) August 12, 2020
I thought @twitter was supposed to flag false information? — Steve Bottom (@Bottom44) August 12, 2020
This is low even for Acosta.
Related:


thelibertydaily--2020-08-14--President Trump Slams Joe Biden for Calling for a Nationwide Face Diaper Mandate: ‘Appalling Lack of

President Trump Slams Joe Biden for Calling for a Nationwide Face Diaper Mandate: ‘Appalling Lack of Respect For the American People’

President Trump spoke out today after Joe Biden and Kamala Harris called for a three month nationwide mask mandate starting immediately .
The two Democrats came out today to announce their three-month mask mandate but didn ’ t take any questions at the end of the announcement .
This was an effort to politicize the coronavirus pandemic , and later , President Trump called the two Democrats out on their low blow : “ Today we saw Joe Biden continue to politicize a pandemic and show his appalling lack of respect for the American people… putting left-wing politics before facts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out the Democrats for their disregard for state ’ s rights : “ I trust the American people and the governors want to do the right thing to make the smart decisions and Joe doesn ’ t… Joe doesn ’ t know too much.
” Video of the announcement is disrespectful to President Trump .
Joe Biden is behaving like he ’ s president calling for a mask mandate starting now .
Completing this poll entitles you to 100 Percent Fed Up updates free of charge .
You may opt out at anytime @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our Privacy Policy .
A timeline that shows President Trump was acting from the beginning of the pandemic :

President Trump spoke out today after Joe Biden and Kamala Harris called for a three month nationwide mask mandate starting immediately. The two Democrats came out today to announce their three-month mask mandate but didn’t take any questions at the end of the announcement. This was an effort to politicize the coronavirus pandemic, and later, President Trump called the two Democrats out on their low blow:
“Today we saw Joe Biden continue to politicize a pandemic and show his appalling lack of respect for the American people… putting left-wing politics before facts and evidence.”
President Trump also called out the Democrats for their disregard for state’s rights:
“I trust the American people and the governors want to do the right thing to make the smart decisions and Joe doesn’t… Joe doesn’t know too much.”
President Trump rips Joe Biden for calling for a national mask mandate: "I trust the American people and the governors want to do the right thing to make the smart decisions and Joe doesn't… Joe doesn't know too much." pic.twitter.com/kLtKPv8K1T — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) August 13, 2020
Video of the announcement is disrespectful to President Trump. Joe Biden is behaving like he’s president calling for a mask mandate starting now.
Advertisement
Joe Biden calls for nationwide mask mandate. "Let's institute a mask mandate, nationwide, starting immediately—and we will save lives." https://t.co/hECiEtQ31u pic.twitter.com/6lF7LzCFT8 — ABC News (@ABC) August 13, 2020
A timeline that shows President Trump was acting from the beginning of the pandemic:


thelibertydaily--2020-08-14--Survey: Over Half of Republican College Students Will Self-Censor This Fall to Avoid Offending Other

Survey: Over Half of Republican College Students Will Self-Censor This Fall to Avoid Offending Others; Democrats? Not So Much

Survey : Over half of Republican college students will self-censor this fall to avoid offending others .
Democrats ?
Not @ @ @ @ @ also found that white students are more likely to self-censor than black or Latino students

Over half of Republican college students said they'll self-censor in class this fall to avoid offending others — but way fewer Democratic college students plan to keep their mouths shut, according to results of a survey The College Fix reported it conducted.
What are the details?
The outlet said its online poll asked 1,000 college students the following question: "With the current political climate, do you expect to self-censor yourself in class this semester so your professors or peers don't take offense at your ideas?"
The College Fix said 54% of Republican-identified students said they are planning to self-censor; 35% of GOP students said they would not, and 11% said they're unsure.
But way fewer Democratic college students — no doubt more sociopolitically comfortable at college as the vast majority of campuses lean decidedly leftward — said they'd self-censor.
In fact, only 15% of Democratic-identified college students said they'd watch their political speech in class, the outlet said, while 68% said they would let their freak flags totally fly, and 16% said they're unsure.
That amounts to Republican college students being three times more likely to self-censor than Democratic student, The College Fix said, citing the survey.
The results also found that white students are more likely to self-censor (30%) than black (20%) or Latino (21%) students, the outlet said.
The College Fix said College Pulse — a survey and analytics company focused on college students — facilitated its poll. The outlet said the survey was conducted Aug. 5-7, and the margin of error was plus or minus 3.5%.
Same old song and dance, my friend
The fact that Republicans on college campuses are far less comfortable speaking about their conservative views is no surprise, as GOP students have been getting attacked for their opinions for years. And given how left-wing militants have been taking over more and more streets this summer through violence and intimidation, one might say it'd be a miracle if Republican students ask for directions to the dining hall.
Princeton University's Robert P. George — a well-respected conservative academic — said earlier this week that he "asked folks who wished to continue following me on Twitter from anonymous accounts to identify themselves privately. I was deluged with messages explaining that anonymity is necessary because they have (some) conservative beliefs and fear being fired if their employers knew."
George added that many of those who messaged him were in academia and "a few even had tenure — yet feared it could be revoked, or that their professional lives could be made untenable in other ways."
"Is this the country we now live in?" George asked in his compelling Twitter thread. "One in which many people feel they must hide their beliefs in order to keep their jobs or maintain their careers? One in which people live in fear of speaking their minds — worrying for their futures and their families' well-being if they do?"


thelibertydaily--2020-08-14--GOP Sen. John Kennedy: Kamala Harris is Like Ocrazio-Cortex ‘But Smarter, and Without the Bartending

GOP Sen. John Kennedy: Kamala Harris is Like Ocrazio-Cortex ‘But Smarter, and Without the Bartending Experience’

Sen. John Kennedy says Kamala Harris is like AOC 'but smarter , and without the bartending experience' He says Biden @ @ @ @ @ 'be a very formidable candidate '

Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) was asked to give his assessment of his colleague Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) this week, after she was tapped to be presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden's running mate.
The Republican summed up Harris' political agenda by comparing her to far-left Democratic socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), "but smarter and without the bartending experience."
What are the details?
Fox News host Neil Cavuto brought Kennedy on his program, asking out of the gate whether he agrees with others' assertions that Harris is "the most liberal" member of the Senate.
"First, Kamala is my colleague, so I want to congratulate her," Kennedy replied. "I think she is very personable, she is very smart, she is very aggressive, and she's very liberal."
Kennedy thought for a moment and added, "I think of Kamala I would describe her as Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez but smarter and without the bartending experience. She'll be a very formidable candidate."
Cavuto then asked whether the Biden-Harris ticket should be viewed as the "moderating influence" on the Democratic Party, as it has been billed by some pundits.
"No," Kennedy replied. "Vice President Biden has promised to be the most liberal president in history if he's elected, and toward that end I think he picked the right running mate because Senator Harris is very, very, very liberal.
"I think they represent the new Democratic Party, which I think has clearly moved to the left, I don't think that's particularly a newsflash for anyone," Kennedy said.
Anything else?
Kennedy then went into the policy positions that Biden and Harris share, saying:
I think they both believe we're one tax increase away from prosperity and they will massively raise taxes. I think they're both very pro-abortion, they think that the border is a nuisance. I think in terms of our enemies across the world, they think we need to be more understanding. I don't think they believe that weakness invites the wolves, as I do. I think what you see is what you're going to get if they're elected.
Sen. Kennedy weighs in on Biden-Harris ticket: She's like AOC but smarter www.youtube.com
According to The Daily Wire's assessment of Harris' policy positions from last fall:
Harris is a full-spectrum progressive who supports a far-left economic, social, and national security agenda. She is fiercely defensive of abortion rights, supports curtailing Second Amendment rights, supports single-payer/"Medicare for All" health insurance, supports marijuana legalization, and favors sanctuary cities and other sovereignty-undermining, pro-amnesty immigration policies.
(H/T: The Daily Wire)


thelibertydaily--2020-08-14--DOJ Investigation Finds Yale University Illegally Discriminates Against Asians and Whites in Undergr

DOJ Investigation Finds Yale University Illegally Discriminates Against Asians and Whites in Undergraduate Admissions in Violation of Federal Civil-Rights Law

A Justice Department investigation found that Yale University illegally discriminates against Asian Americans and White Americans in undergraduate admissions in violation of civil-rights law .
The Department of Justice opened an investigation into Yale in 2018 in response to a complaint alleging Yale discriminates against Asians in its admission process .
The DOJ threatened a lawsuit without changes within two weeks .
TRENDING : Dallas Soccer Star Reggie Cannon Calls Fans `` Disgusting '' for Booing and Chanting `` USA ! ''
as Players Knelt for National Anthem “ Yale grants substantial , and often determinative , preferences based on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and significantly disfavors other applicants because of their race , ” a letter from the Justice Department said after a 2-year investigation .
“ Yale ’ s race discrimination imposes undue and unlawful penalties on racially-disfavored applicants , including in particular Asian American and White applicants.
” “ For example , the likelihood of admission for Asian American and White applicants who have similar academic credentials is significantly lower than for African American and Hispanic applicants to Yale College .
For the great majority of applicants , Asian American and White applicants have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of admission as African American applicants with comparable academic credentials.
” The Justice Department went on to say that since Yale receives federal funding , it is subject to Title VI ’ s anti-discrimination mandate .
“ There is no such thing as a nice form of race discrimination , ” Assistant Attorney General Civil Rights Division Eric Dreiband said in the statement .
“ Unlawfully dividing Americans into racial and ethnic blocs fosters stereotypes , bitterness , and division .
It is past time for American institutions to recognize that all people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and without unlawful regard to the color of their skin.
” Yale has two weeks to make changes .
“ Please be advised that if Yale does not agree to this remedial measure by August 27 , 2020 , we may determine that “ compliance can not be secured by voluntary means..the Department will be prepared to file a lawsuit to enforce Yale ’ s Title VI obligations .
”

A Justice Department investigation found that Yale University illegally discriminates against Asian Americans and White Americans in undergraduate admissions in violation of civil-rights law.
The Department of Justice opened an investigation into Yale in 2018 in response to a complaint alleging Yale discriminates against Asians in its admission process.
The DOJ threatened a lawsuit without changes within two weeks.
INBOX: DOJ Finds Yale Illegally Disciminates against Asians and Whites in Undergraduate Admissions in Violation of Federal Civil-Rights Law. Department threatens suit without changes within two weeks. https://t.co/n73kO56gm3 — Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) August 13, 2020
“Yale grants substantial, and often determinative, preferences based on race to certain racially-favored applicants and relatively and significantly disfavors other applicants because of their race,” a letter from the Justice Department said after a 2-year investigation.
“Yale’s race discrimination imposes undue and unlawful penalties on racially-disfavored applicants, including in particular Asian American and White applicants.”
“For example, the likelihood of admission for Asian American and White applicants who have similar academic credentials is significantly lower than for African American and Hispanic applicants to Yale College. For the great majority of applicants, Asian American and White applicants have only one-tenth to one-fourth of the likelihood of admission as African American applicants with comparable academic credentials.”
The Justice Department went on to say that since Yale receives federal funding, it is subject to Title VI’s anti-discrimination mandate.
“There is no such thing as a nice form of race discrimination,” Assistant Attorney General Civil Rights Division Eric Dreiband said in the statement.
“Unlawfully dividing Americans into racial and ethnic blocs fosters stereotypes, bitterness, and division. It is past time for American institutions to recognize that all people should be treated with decency and respect and without unlawful regard to the color of their skin.”
Yale has two weeks to make changes.
“Please be advised that if Yale does not agree to this remedial measure by August 27, 2020, we may determine that “compliance cannot be secured by voluntary means..the Department will be prepared to file a lawsuit to enforce Yale’s Title VI obligations.”


thelibertydaily--2020-08-14--Trump Admin Designates Confucius Institute As Chinese Communist Party Propaganda Machine to Influenc

Trump Admin Designates Confucius Institute As Chinese Communist Party Propaganda Machine to Influence U.S. Campuses and K-12 Classrooms

The United States announced Thursday it is requiring the center that manages the Communist China funded Confucius Institute in the United States to register as a foreign mission .
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said the institute is “ an entity advancing Beijing ’ s global propaganda and malign influence campaign on U.S. campuses and K-12 classrooms.
” Workers with the Institute in America will not be kicked out but top U.S. diplomat for East Asia David Stilwell said universities should take a “ hard look at the activities they are engaging in on campuses , ” as reported by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of State designated the Confucius Institute U.S. Center as a foreign mission of the PRC , recognizing the CIUS for what it is : an entity advancing Beijing ’ s global propaganda and malign influence campaign on U.S. campuses and K-12 classrooms , ” read the release .
Pompeo ’ s agency details the issues being the curriculum and influence the Institute is having in the education system across the nation .
This follows previous measures taken by the State Department to label media outlets funded by the Communist China Party as foreign @ @

The Chinese Coast Guard and its maritime militia sailed into Philippine waters around the Second Thomas Shoal in the South China Sea, firing water cannons at Philippine vessels and crew seeking to re-supply a Philippine ship within the Philippines’ Exclusive Economic Zone. The US State Department called such actions by China “inconsistent with international law” and “unwarranted interference in lawful Philippine maritime operations.” The State Department has maintained that China has “no lawful claim” to that area.
But rather than standing down, China is attempting to gaslight the Philippines and the world into accepting its narrative. A spokesman for China’s Ministry of National Defense stated that China “has sovereignty” over the area, which it calls “Nansha Qundao, including Ren’ai Jiao,” according to Xinhua. The area in dispute has always been a part of China, according to Global Times.
The CCP press also states that China “lawfully intercepted” the Philippine vessels, China’s actions towards the Philippines “was professional, restrained, and beyond reproach,” and that the “Philippine side ignored China’s goodwill and sincerity.”
Chinese media also paints the US, not China, as the aggressor. According to a spokesman from China’s Foreign Ministry, the US is “blatantly support[ing] the Philippines’ violation of China’s sovereignty, and its plot is doomed to fail,” according to Global Times. In responding to the incident, the US “continues to hype up the longstanding disputes between China [and its neighbors]” in order “to maintain hegemony and create a ‘security trap’” with those neighbors, according to the president of a Beijing think tank as cited by China Daily. The US has “no right to meddle” in the South China Sea” and is “creating trouble and sowing discord,” according to a spokesman for China’s Ministry of National Defense as cited by that same article.
The CCP press pushes an alternative reality of international law to buttress its claims. The Philippines, not China, is in violation of international law, according to spokesmen of China’s Foreign Ministry and Coast Guard as cited by Global Times. The Philippines committed “illegal” acts by re-supplying its ship, and having its ship there in the first place, according to Global Times. Philippines v. China, or the South China Sea Arbitration, is “‘illegal, null and void’ as it violates international law[…]” according to a spokesman from the Chinese foreign ministry, as cited by China Daily. The spokesman further said that “China does not accept or recognize it, and will never accept any claim or action based on the [arbitration]. This position is clear and firm, and is a legitimate step to uphold the international rule of law.” A Global Times article similarly referred to the arbitration as the “so called South China Sea arbitration,” and that it is “illegal and invalid.”
China continues to bully its neighbors in the South China Sea. At the same time, it wages a sophisticated propaganda effort aimed at obscuring this fact to further its hegemony in the region. The United States needs a clear policy to lead its allies in the region against China’s growing threat.


thelibertydaily--2020-08-13--Nazi Collaborator George Soros Admits He Wants to Use the Chi-Com Virus Scamdemic as ‘Revolutionary

Nazi Collaborator George Soros Admits He Wants to Use the Chi-Com Virus Scamdemic as ‘Revolutionary Moment’ for Radical Leftism

Billionaire leftist George Soros just admitted that he intends to use the pandemic as a ‘ revolutionary moment ’ to push radical leftism on America : WASHINGTON TIMES – Billionaire liberal activist George Soros told an Italian newspaper that he sees the coronavirus epidemic as a “ revolutionary ” opportunity .
In an interview with La Repubblica , the Hungarian-born Mr. Soros also denounced President Trump as a “ transitory phenomenon ” but expressed hope that the COVID-19 crisis has opened up politics in a radical direction .
“ I would describe it as a revolutionary moment when the range @ @ @ @ @ @ @ normal times , ” he said .
“ What is inconceivable in normal times becomes not only possible but actually happens .
People are disoriented and scared.
” Got that ?
He intends to use people ’ s disorientation and fear to fundamentally change the country ’ s politics .
But President Trump stands in his way… But Mr. Soros , who was being interviewed by the Rome newspaper on the occasion of his 90th birthday , warned that Mr. Trump “ remains very dangerous , ” despite seeing him as transitory , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ power and avoid prosecution .
“ He ’ s fighting for his life , and he will do anything to stay in power , ” Mr. Soros said , also calling the president “ a confidence trickster ” who can “ undermine democracy from within.
” This is at the heart of this year ’ s election and why all those Never Trumpers like John Kasich , Carly Fiorina , and Bill Kristol , who are supporting Joe Biden over Trump , are just opening the door to Soros and his allies to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s really mind blowing when you think about it .

Billionaire leftist George Soros just admitted that he intends to use the pandemic as a ‘revolutionary moment’ to push radical leftism on America:
WASHINGTON TIMES – Billionaire liberal activist George Soros told an Italian newspaper that he sees the coronavirus epidemic as a “revolutionary” opportunity. In an interview with La Repubblica, the Hungarian-born Mr. Soros also denounced President Trump as a “transitory phenomenon” but expressed hope that the COVID-19 crisis has opened up politics in a radical direction. “I would describe it as a revolutionary moment when the range of possibilities is much greater than in normal times,” he said. “What is inconceivable in normal times becomes not only possible but actually happens. People are disoriented and scared.”
Got that? He intends to use people’s disorientation and fear to fundamentally change the country’s politics.
But President Trump stands in his way…
But Mr. Soros, who was being interviewed by the Rome newspaper on the occasion of his 90th birthday, warned that Mr. Trump “remains very dangerous,” despite seeing him as transitory, because of his efforts to stay in power and avoid prosecution. “He’s fighting for his life, and he will do anything to stay in power,” Mr. Soros said, also calling the president “a confidence trickster” who can “undermine democracy from within.”
This is at the heart of this year’s election and why all those Never Trumpers like John Kasich, Carly Fiorina, and Bill Kristol, who are supporting Joe Biden over Trump, are just opening the door to Soros and his allies to radically transform this country. It’s really mind blowing when you think about it.
MUST READ AND SHAREhttps://t.co/uR7MWZdHgo — Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) August 13, 2020


thelibertydaily--2020-08-13--President Trump Announces Historic Peace Deal Between Israel And United Arab Emirates

The United States has brokered a peace deal between Israel and the United Arab Emirates , President Donald Trump announced Thursday on Twitter .
Leaders from the three countries released a joint statement on the deal , saying it is a major step toward securing peace in the Middle East .
The statement says Israel and the UAE will begin extensive cooperation on coronavirus vaccine research , as well as begin negotiations for investment , tourism and trade between the two countries .
“ Prime Minister Netanyahu and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan express their deep appreciation to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the region and to the pragmatic and unique approach he has taken to achieve it , ” the joint statement says .
( RELATED : US Universities Took $ 600 Million Tied To Islamic Nations While Forming Grade School Curricula ) The agreement also notably says Israel has agreed to relinquish its claims of sovereignty over the West Bank , a move Israel ’ s Arab neighbors have long pushed for .
The Trump administration announced the deal is being called the “ Abraham Accord , ” with Senior Adviser Jared Kushner @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Israel.
” Secretary of State Mike Pompeo also praised the decision , saying the U.S. hopes the agreement is the first of many steps toward ending 72 years of hostilities in the region .
“ Today ’ s normalization agreement between Israel and the Emirates holds similar potential and the promise for a better day for the entire region .
The United States congratulates Israel and the Emirates for their important achievement .
Blessed are the peacemakers , ” Pompeo said in a statement .
Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nations to follow the UAE ’ s lead .
“ Things are happening that I can ’ t talk talk about , ” he said .

The United States has brokered a peace deal between Israel and the United Arab Emirates, President Donald Trump announced Thursday on Twitter.
Leaders from the three countries released a joint statement on the deal, saying it is a major step toward securing peace in the Middle East. The statement says Israel and the UAE will begin extensive cooperation on coronavirus vaccine research, as well as begin negotiations for investment, tourism and trade between the two countries.
HUGE breakthrough today! Historic Peace Agreement between our two GREAT friends, Israel and the United Arab Emirates! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 13, 2020
Joint Statement of the United States, the State of Israel, and the United Arab Emirates pic.twitter.com/oVyjLxf0jd — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 13, 2020
“Prime Minister Netanyahu and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan express their deep appreciation to President Trump for his dedication to peace in the region and to the pragmatic and unique approach he has taken to achieve it,” the joint statement says. (RELATED: US Universities Took $600 Million Tied To Islamic Nations While Forming Grade School Curricula)
The agreement also notably says Israel has agreed to relinquish its claims of sovereignty over the West Bank, a move Israel’s Arab neighbors have long pushed for.
The Trump administration announced the deal is being called the “Abraham Accord,” with Senior Adviser Jared Kushner saying “Muslims will be welcome in Israel.”
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo also praised the decision, saying the U.S. hopes the agreement is the first of many steps toward ending 72 years of hostilities in the region.
“Today’s normalization agreement between Israel and the Emirates holds similar potential and the promise for a better day for the entire region. The United States congratulates Israel and the Emirates for their important achievement. Blessed are the peacemakers,” Pompeo said in a statement.
Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday morning that he expects other Muslim nations to follow the UAE’s lead.
“Things are happening that I can’t talk talk about,” he said.