thelibertydaily--2020-07-09--When Did the Left First Go Woke? When They Betrayed Black Slaves

Leftists : still cheating on black slaves with their masters .
[ Photo above : Black Sudanese slave women rest as they wait to be redeemed by aid workers from Christian Solidarity International after years of enslavement by Arab masters in the north — January 8 , 2011 , American Anti-Slavery Group . ]
Twenty-three years ago yesterday , in 1997 , Dr. Charles Jacobs , a frequent FrontPageMag contributor and president of the pro-Israel educational non-profit Americans for Peace and Tolerance , published a biting op-ed in The Boston Globe : “ Where are the liberals ?
” At @ @ @ @ @ @ @ human rights campaigner and Jewish activist , was the president and research director of the American Anti-Slavery Group , an organization at the forefront of the war against modern-day black slavery in Africa .
By 1997 , thanks to his relentless activism and that of the heroic black journalist Sam Cotton ( may his memory be a blessing ) , the world was slowly coming to grips with a vile fact : that Arabs and Muslims own black men , women , and children as chattel property in Mauritania and Sudan — today @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this news inadvertently .
One day in 1990 he picked up a copy of The Economist on a flight home , and flipped to page 42 where he found a one-page editorial entitled “ Slavery : By any other name.
” What he read shook him to his core : “ In Sudan chattel slavery is spreading fast , as a consequence of the civil war between the black Christian and pagan southerners and the Arab , Muslim north.… In February 1988 a [ black ] child could be bought for $ 90 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two years later ] that the price has now fallen to $ 15.
” A child cheaper than a pizza ; Jacobs took the magazine home with him and was never the same .
The problem , however , was that all of the activist and media elements which one would think would jump to free modern-day black slaves , including the formidable anti-apartheid coalition of the 1980s , simply weren ’ t there .
Even worse , organizations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch — the people who had produced the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jacobs and others to its horrors — simply refused to be of much help .
Furthermore , so-called black “ leaders ” like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton , world-famous figures with massive community and media clout , either directly rebuffed efforts to help tell the world , or backed off at the behest of actively hostile parties such as Louis Farrakhan ( who decided to act out of character and blame the Jews ) .
Though a few brave and decent people in the mainstream media , such as at Dateline NBC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ did do their part in broadcasting the images and accounts of slavery , such instances of righteousness were few and far between — and today , are just about extinct .
What , then , astounded Dr. Jacobs and his allies was that it was conservatives and evangelical Christians who actually took up the fight .
While liberals waffled and worried about offending Arabs or “ dividing ” the black community ( against Farrakhan , Jackson , and Sharpton ) , conservatives stood up .
For instance , Pat Robertson ’ s 700 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mouthpiece for the abolitionist movement .
In the spring of 1997 , they were likely the first national television show to broadcast footage of angels like Dr. John Eibner and Baroness Caroline Cox of Christian Solidarity International directly buying back Sudanese slaves ’ freedom .
In fact , their segment was specifically shaped to refute Farrakhan ’ s disgusting public denial of slavery from a year earlier — Robertson himself trashed Farrakhan as “ an absolute charlatan.
” Jacobs also approached feminists , telling them that female slaves , forcibly converted to Islam @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Sudan , are mostly concubines whose bonded wombs their Arab captors use as a sadistic weapon of cultural , demographic , and racial jihād .
Nobody agreed to help except Barbara Ledeen of the conservative Independent Women ’ s Forum , who in 1996 helped organize a four-hour hearing on slavery before members of Congress at which Jacobs , Cotton , Cox , and other abolitionists testified .
Liberals , however , save for a precious few laudable Democrats like Barney Frank and the late Donald Payne , were silent .
That @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , “ Where are the liberals ?
” The answer is staring us in the face today .
Around that time , we now know , the crackpot cultural Marxist idea that “ white people ” can ’ t criticize evil committed by non-Westerners was becoming en vogue .
Since white people have committed grievous violations of non-white people ’ s human rights in the past , all they have the right to do now is crusade to correct Western sins , and leave those non-Westerners commit today , no matter how much @ @ @ @ @ @ @ For white “ human rights ” activists who ’ ve snookered themselves into feeling guilty about the “ unearned ” wealth on which they live , this serves as their masochistic expiation .
When given the choice between virtue-signaling with a black square as their profile pictures on Instagram and freeing real-life black slaves , we know which one liberals will choose .
Back then , Jacobs called this the “ human rights complex.
” Today , it ’ s called “ intersectionality , ” where Jews are now at or near the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ oppressor ” cabal , and neither have the right to their own state , nor to tell Black Lives Matter or Farrakhan that they ’ re racist , anti-Semitic hypocrites who care nothing about addressing the deep-seated , heart-wrenching problems in the black community — or about black slaves owned and brutalized by non-white masters .
This was why , five years after this op-ed , Jacobs published another in the Globe : “ Why Israel , and not Sudan , is singled out.
” Israel accidentally kills a few civilians while targeting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ war crimes.
” But about Sudanese Arabs who murder and enslave tens of the thousands of black African Christians — the “ human rights community ” just whispers , if that .
This is even more egregious when we see most of the left ’ s characteristic inaction now that we know there is also Islamic slavery in Algeria , Libya , and Nigeria .
They ’ d rather applaud statues of George Washington and General Grant being torn down by mobs of spoiled , ignorant children .
It is always a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ past comes true , and remains unheeded .
Ben Poser is the research director of the American Anti-Slavery Group .

[Photo above: Black Sudanese slave women rest as they wait to be redeemed by aid workers from Christian Solidarity International after years of enslavement by Arab masters in the north — January 8, 2011, American Anti-Slavery Group.]
Twenty-three years ago yesterday, in 1997, Dr. Charles Jacobs, a frequent FrontPageMag contributor and president of the pro-Israel educational non-profit Americans for Peace and Tolerance, published a biting op-ed in The Boston Globe: “Where are the liberals?”
At the time, Dr. Jacobs, a human rights campaigner and Jewish activist, was the president and research director of the American Anti-Slavery Group, an organization at the forefront of the war against modern-day black slavery in Africa.
By 1997, thanks to his relentless activism and that of the heroic black journalist Sam Cotton (may his memory be a blessing), the world was slowly coming to grips with a vile fact: that Arabs and Muslims own black men, women, and children as chattel property in Mauritania and Sudan — today. Dr. Jacobs himself had come to this news inadvertently. One day in 1990 he picked up a copy of The Economist on a flight home, and flipped to page 42 where he found a one-page editorial entitled “Slavery: By any other name.” What he read shook him to his core: “In Sudan chattel slavery is spreading fast, as a consequence of the civil war between the black Christian and pagan southerners and the Arab, Muslim north.… In February 1988 a [black] child could be bought for $90; so many slaves are available [two years later] that the price has now fallen to $15.” A child cheaper than a pizza; Jacobs took the magazine home with him and was never the same.
The problem, however, was that all of the activist and media elements which one would think would jump to free modern-day black slaves, including the formidable anti-apartheid coalition of the 1980s, simply weren’t there. Even worse, organizations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch — the people who had produced the reports of slavery which originally alerted Dr. Jacobs and others to its horrors — simply refused to be of much help.
Furthermore, so-called black “leaders” like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, world-famous figures with massive community and media clout, either directly rebuffed efforts to help tell the world, or backed off at the behest of actively hostile parties such as Louis Farrakhan (who decided to act out of character and blame the Jews).
Though a few brave and decent people in the mainstream media, such as at Dateline NBC and even The New York Times, did do their part in broadcasting the images and accounts of slavery, such instances of righteousness were few and far between — and today, are just about extinct.
What, then, astounded Dr. Jacobs and his allies was that it was conservatives and evangelical Christians who actually took up the fight. While liberals waffled and worried about offending Arabs or “dividing” the black community (against Farrakhan, Jackson, and Sharpton), conservatives stood up. For instance, Pat Robertson’s 700 Club and CBN News became a forceful mouthpiece for the abolitionist movement. In the spring of 1997, they were likely the first national television show to broadcast footage of angels like Dr. John Eibner and Baroness Caroline Cox of Christian Solidarity International directly buying back Sudanese slaves’ freedom. In fact, their segment was specifically shaped to refute Farrakhan’s disgusting public denial of slavery from a year earlier — Robertson himself trashed Farrakhan as “an absolute charlatan.”
Jacobs also approached feminists, telling them that female slaves, forcibly converted to Islam and often vaginally mutilated in the case of Sudan, are mostly concubines whose bonded wombs their Arab captors use as a sadistic weapon of cultural, demographic, and racial jihād. Nobody agreed to help except Barbara Ledeen of the conservative Independent Women’s Forum, who in 1996 helped organize a four-hour hearing on slavery before members of Congress at which Jacobs, Cotton, Cox, and other abolitionists testified.
Liberals, however, save for a precious few laudable Democrats like Barney Frank and the late Donald Payne, were silent.
That is what led Dr. Jacobs to ask, “Where are the liberals?”
The answer is staring us in the face today. Around that time, we now know, the crackpot cultural Marxist idea that “white people” can’t criticize evil committed by non-Westerners was becoming en vogue. Since white people have committed grievous violations of non-white people’s human rights in the past, all they have the right to do now is crusade to correct Western sins, and leave those non-Westerners commit today, no matter how much worse they may be, alone. For white “human rights” activists who’ve snookered themselves into feeling guilty about the “unearned” wealth on which they live, this serves as their masochistic expiation. When given the choice between virtue-signaling with a black square as their profile pictures on Instagram and freeing real-life black slaves, we know which one liberals will choose.
Back then, Jacobs called this the “human rights complex.” Today, it’s called “intersectionality,” where Jews are now at or near the top of the rich, white “oppressor” cabal, and neither have the right to their own state, nor to tell Black Lives Matter or Farrakhan that they’re racist, anti-Semitic hypocrites who care nothing about addressing the deep-seated, heart-wrenching problems in the black community — or about black slaves owned and brutalized by non-white masters.
This was why, five years after this op-ed, Jacobs published another in the Globe: “Why Israel, and not Sudan, is singled out.” Israel accidentally kills a few civilians while targeting terrorists — Human Rights Watch cries about “war crimes.” But about Sudanese Arabs who murder and enslave tens of the thousands of black African Christians — the “human rights community” just whispers, if that.
This is even more egregious when we see most of the left’s characteristic inaction now that we know there is also Islamic slavery in Algeria, Libya, and Nigeria. They’d rather applaud statues of George Washington and General Grant being torn down by mobs of spoiled, ignorant children.
It is always a sad day when a warning from the past comes true, and remains unheeded.
Ben Poser is the research director of the American Anti-Slavery Group.


thelibertydaily--2020-07-09--The Beginning of the End of Whites in South Africa

White South Africans will be resilient to the end .
Their only regret is the speed with which it now comes .
Coming from a one-man mountain with more shrapnel scars than most , things must be looking bleak in South Africa .
And it ’ s worse than any of us can imagine .
Eighty-four farm attacks since lockdown began , twelve white farmers slaughtered from their land .
The footage of the aftermath of one of the attacks circulating on Telegram and sent to me — too brutal to share .
Only monsters could do such things to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ As many of us celebrated the 4th of July this weekend , there were three murders in two days , one of them so unspeakably cruel that even those hardened to the news of torture of farmers by black gangs have found themselves white-knuckled at the speed of the horror .
When these massive men like Jess feel it , we need to stop and listen .
They are the first people I would run to if I needed protecting : strong , sturdy , unflinching .
These strong South Africans are part @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coursing throughout their blood just as the sunshine and water spills through the crops and trees on their soil .
Hearing the horrible news I want to grab my little daysack — sitting ready with my passport and power plugs — pull on my boots and go .
I am desperate to head back to their country , somehow leap into the struggle and to help the murdered be heard .
For now I share their pictures with you , hopelessly trying to reanimate them as individuals , instead of more bodies on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
He was a well-loved Afrikaans singer .
He was ambushed and shot dead outside his farm on Friday .
Nothing was stolen ; there was no motive for the attack apart from the color of his skin .
He was 46 .
This smiling gentleman is Julian Stobbs .
He was a Brit , a Royal Navy man and veteran of the Falklands War .
A black gang raided at his home as he slept alongside his partner on Friday 3 July .
They stole everything in the house and fled , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ kill him .
Julian was 59 .
In Kwa-Zuklu Natal , Zakiyya Ahmedjan Ismail was brutally killed in her home .
She was four months pregnant and a mother of two .
Three armed men gained entry through the kitchen door and demanded cash .
The father tried to protect his family , but was beaten off .
They were strangling his daughter , aged 8 and kicked the 4-year-old .
The attackers dragged the pregnant mother into the bathroom and slit her throat .
She was 26 years old .
The hatred @ @ @ @ @ @ @ means Indian families are a target too .
Ian Cameron ( author of this tweet ) heads up Afriforum ’ s Community Safety team , endlessly on the road in his vehicle calmly providing his physical presence at flareups between those seeking violence and white farmers defending their land .
We spent time together when I was in South Africa making my documentary Plaasmoorde , the Killing Fields .
He is another one of the big strong men who have been ankle deep in the blood and gore of this slaughter for years @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the air — a sense that things are speeding up , and deteriorating faster than before .
Ian sent me his tweet hoping I could help share the information , near desperation borne out of the real sense that no one is listening , no one is seeing what is happening to white South Africans , now down to 4 % and close to extinction .
In country , it is almost unbelievable that no one seems to care .
Even docile opposition parties have been forced into public statements on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Alliance spokesperson for agriculture in KZN , could not ignore the brutality of the murder of the pregnant mum on his patch and says he is pleading with Cyril Ramaphosa to `` break his silence '' on farm murders and have them reclassified as `` hate crimes . ''
“ We are shocked and appalled by the murder that took place in Weenen , KZN – especially due to the loss of an unborn child .
There are now two fundamental issues South Africans must deal with : Why does the president stay @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are farm murders not classed as hate crimes ?
” Of course , these are empty words .
Politicians already know the answer to the President 's silence .
By making Land Expropriation without compensation part of the ANC agenda , Cyril Ramoposa has created a culture of permissiveness in which attacks on whites are legitimized .
The brute squad — the Economic Freedom Fighters — are right there , like hyenas rasping at the ankles of the whites , hungry to claim a scalp .
Their red-beret mob chanting `` Kill the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a rallying cry for their supporters for whom the killing of whites is an approved and profitable sport .
Apartheid never went away .
It just changed color .
The big question I see being asked by people like your good selves is , `` Why do the white farmers stay ?
Why don ’ t they just leave ? ''
And it was my question too before I walked these farms , and sat with the farming men and women — looking out over their land .
The reason is staring you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the land .
Many watched their grandfathers turn it from rough bushveld into fertile acres where for the fortunate , bananas , macadamias and avocados will grow .
Even on struggling farms , many white farmers work alongside the same families of black farm workers their grandfathers employed two generations before .
For most , the land is all they have .
Many are incredibly poor ; they have no savings or assets with which to start again .
Everything they own or earn is in front of them , rooted in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with their hearts .
And where would they go ?
The sprawling slums crawling with vermin and flies are not reserved for struggling blacks ; 30,000 whites live in these desperate places without water , electricity or hope .
Australia discussed giving them amnesty until the liberals declared the idea racist .
The rest of the world rejects these murders as a far-right conspiracy or myth .
Without a means to leave , or a place to go , what would you have them do ?
Many are preparing for a final fight @ @ @ @ @ @ @ '' with determination .
Most sleep with a loaded weapon under their pillow , stealing themselves for death if it should come .
They won ’ t die without a fight .
It is the reason religion is so strong here , why crosses can be still seen on buildings and hilltops , because when there is nothing left that makes sense , and apparently no power willing to defend white South Africans , God remains… God and the land .
I sat with a victim of a farm attack , Bernard , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the land he refuses to leave .
He says : “ I will die in my boots from the love of my land .
I put my trust in God . ''
You know , it is not defeat that makes them talk this way , but sheer resilience .
They will be resilient to the end .
Their only regret is the speed with which it now comes .

“It’s been a rough month,” says Jess.
Coming from a one-man mountain with more shrapnel scars than most, things must be looking bleak in South Africa.
And it’s worse than any of us can imagine. Eighty-four farm attacks since lockdown began, twelve white farmers slaughtered from their land. The footage of the aftermath of one of the attacks circulating on Telegram and sent to me — too brutal to share. Only monsters could do such things to the elderly in their own homes.
As many of us celebrated the 4th of July this weekend, there were three murders in two days, one of them so unspeakably cruel that even those hardened to the news of torture of farmers by black gangs have found themselves white-knuckled at the speed of the horror.
When these massive men like Jess feel it, we need to stop and listen. They are the first people I would run to if I needed protecting: strong, sturdy, unflinching. These strong South Africans are part of the land, they have it coursing throughout their blood just as the sunshine and water spills through the crops and trees on their soil.
Hearing the horrible news I want to grab my little daysack — sitting ready with my passport and power plugs — pull on my boots and go. I am desperate to head back to their country, somehow leap into the struggle and to help the murdered be heard. For now I share their pictures with you, hopelessly trying to reanimate them as individuals, instead of more bodies on a pile.
This is Wynand Breedt. He was a well-loved Afrikaans singer.
He was ambushed and shot dead outside his farm on Friday. Nothing was stolen; there was no motive for the attack apart from the color of his skin. He was 46.
This smiling gentleman is Julian Stobbs. He was a Brit, a Royal Navy man and veteran of the Falklands War. A black gang raided at his home as he slept alongside his partner on Friday 3 July. They stole everything in the house and fled, only to return briefly to shoot and kill him. Julian was 59.
In Kwa-Zuklu Natal, Zakiyya Ahmedjan Ismail was brutally killed in her home. She was four months pregnant and a mother of two. Three armed men gained entry through the kitchen door and demanded cash. The father tried to protect his family, but was beaten off. They were strangling his daughter, aged 8 and kicked the 4-year-old.
The attackers dragged the pregnant mother into the bathroom and slit her throat. She was 26 years old.
The hatred of “others” in South Africa means Indian families are a target too.
Ian Cameron (author of this tweet) heads up Afriforum’s Community Safety team, endlessly on the road in his vehicle calmly providing his physical presence at flareups between those seeking violence and white farmers defending their land. We spent time together when I was in South Africa making my documentary Plaasmoorde, the Killing Fields.
He is another one of the big strong men who have been ankle deep in the blood and gore of this slaughter for years, but can still smell a change in the air — a sense that things are speeding up, and deteriorating faster than before. Ian sent me his tweet hoping I could help share the information, near desperation borne out of the real sense that no one is listening, no one is seeing what is happening to white South Africans, now down to 4% and close to extinction. In country, it is almost unbelievable that no one seems to care.
Even docile opposition parties have been forced into public statements on the slaughter. Chris Pappas, a Democratic Alliance spokesperson for agriculture in KZN, could not ignore the brutality of the murder of the pregnant mum on his patch and says he is pleading with Cyril Ramaphosa to “break his silence” on farm murders and have them reclassified as “hate crimes.”
“We are shocked and appalled by the murder that took place in Weenen, KZN – especially due to the loss of an unborn child. There are now two fundamental issues South Africans must deal with: Why does the president stay silent on these incidents? And why are farm murders not classed as hate crimes?”
Of course, these are empty words.
Politicians already know the answer to the President’s silence. By making Land Expropriation without compensation part of the ANC agenda, Cyril Ramoposa has created a culture of permissiveness in which attacks on whites are legitimized. The brute squad — the Economic Freedom Fighters — are right there, like hyenas rasping at the ankles of the whites, hungry to claim a scalp. Their red-beret mob chanting “Kill the Boer, kill the whites” is a rallying cry for their supporters for whom the killing of whites is an approved and profitable sport.
Apartheid never went away. It just changed color.
The big question I see being asked by people like your good selves is, “Why do the white farmers stay? Why don’t they just leave?” And it was my question too before I walked these farms, and sat with the farming men and women — looking out over their land.
The reason is staring you in the face. The answer IS the land.
Many watched their grandfathers turn it from rough bushveld into fertile acres where for the fortunate, bananas, macadamias and avocados will grow. Even on struggling farms, many white farmers work alongside the same families of black farm workers their grandfathers employed two generations before.
For most, the land is all they have. Many are incredibly poor; they have no savings or assets with which to start again. Everything they own or earn is in front of them, rooted in the soil they would leave behind, along with their hearts.
And where would they go? The sprawling slums crawling with vermin and flies are not reserved for struggling blacks; 30,000 whites live in these desperate places without water, electricity or hope.
Australia discussed giving them amnesty until the liberals declared the idea racist. The rest of the world rejects these murders as a far-right conspiracy or myth.
Without a means to leave, or a place to go, what would you have them do? Many are preparing for a final fight and talk about the “last stand” with determination. Most sleep with a loaded weapon under their pillow, stealing themselves for death if it should come. They won’t die without a fight.
It is the reason religion is so strong here, why crosses can be still seen on buildings and hilltops, because when there is nothing left that makes sense, and apparently no power willing to defend white South Africans, God remains… God and the land.
I sat with a victim of a farm attack, Bernard, on his front porch looking out over the land he refuses to leave. He says:
“I will die in my boots from the love of my land. I put my trust in God.”
You know, it is not defeat that makes them talk this way, but sheer resilience. They will be resilient to the end. Their only regret is the speed with which it now comes.
* * *
Photo credit: Plaasmoorde


thelibertydaily--2020-07-10--James Woods on Latest Biden Gaffe: ‘It’s Outright Cruelty’ To Leave Him in Front of Camera

Conservative commentator and actor James Woods issued an urgent call for an intervention Wednesday after Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden ’ s latest gaffe .
Biden was giving a remote address to the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers when his remarks hit a jarring pothole .
After explaining how union workers would benefit from a Biden presidency , Biden said he would “ rewrite our economy so the prosperity flows not just to CEOs , but to workers who actually build the country.
” Mentioning Lonnie Stephenson , president of the union , Biden said , “ Lonnie knows I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Then came the oops moment .
TRENDING : Punk Threatening Group of Cops Does n't Sound So Tough When They Call His Bluff After a moment of awkward silence , the remarks got back on track .
“ I- What I proposed is- is it can be done , ” Biden said .
All this was too much for Woods .
“ Where is his wife ?
Does she not care ?
It ’ s outright cruelty , ” Woods tweeted .
For some , Biden ’ s gaffes perhaps add a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in COVID-19-stricken America , but Chad Banghart , executive director of the Committee to Defend the President , found a darker theme which he expressed in a June Op-Ed .
“ Biden gaffes are unlike any others .
They point to a deeper and darker truth : Biden is mentally unfit for our nation ’ s highest office , ” he wrote .
RELATED : Kanye West Clarifies 2020 Plans : 'To Say That the Black Vote Is Democratic Is a Form of Racism' “ Whether he is suffering from dementia or simply @ @ @ @ @ @ @ watching a 5-minute clip of Biden is enough to realize that this Democratic presidential candidate is way , way past his prime ( if there ever was one ) , ” he wrote .
Partisan sniping aside , Joe Concha , a reporter for The Hill , said Democrats might not say a lot about the gaffes , but they find them worrisome as an indicator of Biden ’ s mental ability .
Concha was focusing on the lack of news conferences by Biden in an interview with Fox News .
“ A @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at least , privately that he [ Biden ] does not have the mental acuity that he even had a couple of years ago and this is a candidate that simply would not able to withstand the type of press conferences that the current president has , as far as them going on for an hour-hour and a half , taking questions with multiple outlets with no ground rules attached , ” Concha said .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Conservative commentator and actor James Woods issued an urgent call for an intervention Wednesday after Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden’s latest gaffe.
Biden was giving a remote address to the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers when his remarks hit a jarring pothole.
After explaining how union workers would benefit from a Biden presidency, Biden said he would “rewrite our economy so the prosperity flows not just to CEOs, but to workers who actually build the country.”
Mentioning Lonnie Stephenson, president of the union, Biden said, “Lonnie knows I believe this with every fiber of my being.”
Then came the oops moment.
“We’re posed,” Biden said.
After a moment of awkward silence, the remarks got back on track.
“I- What I proposed is- is it can be done,” Biden said.
All this was too much for Woods.
“Where is his wife? Does she not care? It’s outright cruelty,” Woods tweeted.
Where is his wife? Does she not care? It’s outright cruelty. pic.twitter.com/J0mnPX0qI9 — James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) July 9, 2020
For some, Biden’s gaffes perhaps add a note of levity to a dark time in COVID-19-stricken America, but Chad Banghart, executive director of the Committee to Defend the President, found a darker theme that he expressed in a June Op-Ed.
“Biden gaffes are unlike any others. They point to a deeper and darker truth: Biden is mentally unfit for our nation’s highest office,” he wrote.
Do these gaffes prove Biden is unfit to be president? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 99% (4805 Votes) No: 1% (43 Votes)
“Whether he is suffering from dementia or simply losing his oral skills with age, watching a 5-minute clip of Biden is enough to realize that this Democratic presidential candidate is way, way past his prime (if there ever was one),” he wrote.
Partisan sniping aside, Joe Concha, a reporter for The Hill, said Democrats might not say a lot about the gaffes, but they find them worrisome as an indicator of Biden’s mental ability.
Concha was focusing on the lack of news conferences by Biden in an interview with Fox News.
“A lot of Democrats will tell you, at least privately, that he [Biden] does not have the mental acuity that he even had a couple of years ago, and this is a candidate that simply would not able to withstand the type of press conferences that the current president has, as far as them going on for an hour-hour and a half, taking questions with multiple outlets with no ground rules attached,” Concha said.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


thelibertydaily--2020-07-10--Doxed on Social Media for Supporting President Trump, Seattle Suburb Homeowner Films Triggered Democ

Doxed on Social Media for Supporting President Trump, Seattle Suburb Homeowner Films Triggered Democrat Vandals

A Kirkland resident named Jed Darland joined the Todd Herman Show on Thursday to explain the bizarre attacks his household @ @ @ @ @ some flowers in a pattern that read “ MAGA.
” Jed explained that a woman @ @ @ @ @ allowed to express his views .
She stopped , got images of the flowers , @ @ @ @ @ media along with directions telling people how they could get to his house .
Soon @ @ @ @ @ began and escalated into what Jed describes as a crazy chase in Kirkland .
Hear @ @ @ @ @ on the Todd Herman Show : Here is one of Jed ’ s videos of @ @ @ @ @ started a GoFundMe to help cover the costs of re-planting the flowers , which he @ @ @ @ @ are ripped out .
Listen to the Todd Herman Show weekday mornings from 6 – @ @ @ @ @ AM ( or HD Radio 97.3 FM HD-Channel 3 ) .
Subscribe to the podcast @ @

A Kirkland resident named Jed Darland joined the Todd Herman Show on Thursday to explain the bizarre attacks his household has undergone after he planted some flowers in a pattern that read “MAGA.”
Jed explained that a woman decided he should not be allowed to express his views. She stopped, got images of the flowers, and placed them on social media along with directions telling people how they could get to his house. Soon, a series of attacks began and escalated into what Jed describes as a crazy chase in Kirkland.
Hear the full interview with Jed on the Todd Herman Show:
Here is one of Jed’s videos of acts of vandalism:
Jed started a GoFundMe to help cover the costs of re-planting the flowers, which he pledges to do whenever they are ripped out.
Listen to the Todd Herman Show weekday mornings from 6 – 9 a.m. on KTTH 770 AM (or HD Radio 97.3 FM HD-Channel 3). Subscribe to the podcast here.


thelibertydaily--2020-07-10--It’s Time to Cancel Democrat-Worshiped Planned Butcherhood Founder Margaret Sanger, Who Called Black

It’s Time to Cancel Democrat-Worshiped Planned Butcherhood Founder Margaret Sanger, Who Called Blacks ‘Human Weeds’

However , the defenders of this “ cancel culture ” have forgotten to include one person in their purge : Margaret Sanger , who founded what would later become Planned Parenthood .
Sanger is featured in the Smithsonian National Portrait Gallery , has a square named after her in New York , and an award Planned Parenthood has given politicians and activists for nearly fifty years .
You ’ ve probably seen people on the news tear down statues and demand buildings be renamed that have any reference to past injustice .
This includes not just notorious figures , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Washington , Thomas Jefferson , and Fr .
Junipero Serra .
Sanger ’ s legacy includes truly horrible treatment of people of color .
But before we make this case , we have to clear up some “ fake news ” about Sanger : • The quote “ Slavs , Latin and Hebrew immigrants are human weeds .
Blacks , soldiers and Jews are a menace to the race.
, ” appears to be apocryphal as it can not be located in Sanger ’ s writings ( though , as we ’ ll @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and disabled “ human weeds ” ) .
• Another quote , “ The mass of ignorant Negroes still breed carelessly and disastrously , so that the increase among Negroes , even more than the increase among whites , is from that portion of the population least intelligent and fit , and least able to rear their children properly , ” is actually from black socialist W.E.B .
Du Bois , who was a contributor to Sanger ’ s Birth Control Review .
Like Sanger and other eugenicists , he believed that only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , though it shouldn ’ t be claimed that he harbored racist motives .
• There is a fake picture of Margaret Sanger speaking at a Ku Klux Klan rally circulating online .
Sanger did address a women ’ s auxiliary meeting of the Klan in 1926 , which she justified by saying “ any aroused group is a good group.
” However , in her autobiography she described the experience as being “ weird ” and doesn ’ t seem particularly enamored with the group .
So what is the authentic evidence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ most famous is an excerpt from a letter she wrote to Clarence Gamble about the “ Negro Project , ” which was an effort to promote access to contraception in black communities .
She wrote , “ We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population , and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.
” This passage can be read in two ways—either as a warning against revealing her true @ @ @ @ @ @ @ eliminate the black race , or as a caution against spreading the false idea that she wanted to exterminate their race and enlisted black ministers to “ straighten out ” people who arrived at that incorrect conclusion .
The non-racist reading is supported by some of Sanger ’ s other statements , such as in 1946 , when she said “ every possible effort should be made to have every Negro child count as a valuable contribution to the future of America.
” In a 1945 interview she said she turned down a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the donor wanted to use contraceptives to eliminate black people .
The Washington Post called this an “ inartfully written ” sentence , but defenders of cancel culture who routinely ignore intentions and interpret people ’ s words in the worst possible way are inconsistent if they refuse to do the same with Sanger .
But even if Sanger were not racist herself , her actions contributed to systems that greatly harmed blacks and other minorities , which is all that defenders of “ cancel culture ” need to justify condemning her .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Junipero Serra or Christopher Columbus because they made it possible for other people to exploit indigenous people and infect them with diseases to which they had no immunity .
The fact that Serra and Columbus never intended these harms is irrelevant to the critic ’ s conclusion that these individuals deserve cancellation .
Considering the true and ugly consequences of Sanger ’ s push for eugenics only strengthens the case .
She believed that the disabled , the unintelligent , and criminals were a drain on society and the key to removing them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wrote “ Feeblemindedness is the more serious of the problems , because it is an absolute dead weight on the race .
.
.
As it is inheritable , it renders it a deteriorating poison and depreciates the whole quality of a people.
” By “ race ” Sanger means the human race , but it would be understandable if you associated her words with white supremacy .
Eugenicists of Sanger ’ s time believed “ Nordic ” humans were the fittest due to their height and relative good health , which turned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were the only “ fit ” race .
Adolf Hitler told a confidante “ I have studied with great interest the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny , in all probability , be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock.
” Similar claims are made by many contributors throughout Sanger ’ s Birth Control Review .
You can ’ t slide a piece of paper between Hitler ’ s dehumanizing language and much of Sanger ’ s own language .
She wrote in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gradual suppression , elimination and eventual extinction , of defective stocks—those human weeds which threaten the blooming of the finest flowers of American civilization.
” Sanger ’ s primary way to accomplish this was through promoting the voluntary use of contraceptives among the poor and others she viewed as being “ unfit.
” Surprisingly , she promoted contraception over elective abortion , calling the latter “ barbaric ” and a “ disgrace to civilization.
” But she recognized that her voluntary , contraceptive approach could only go so far : By “ drastic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In the same article , she says “ In case of refusal [ to use birth control ] such persons should have a choice of sterilization or isolation .
Under no circumstances should the state allow such parents to cast their diseased and demented progeny upon society for the normal and fit to provide for.
” This was not a mere dystopian fantasy : in the 1922 case of Buck v Bell the Supreme Court upheld the State ’ s right to sterilize people against their will .
In North Carolina , for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ place between 1929 and 1976 .
Even without being explicitly racist , Sanger ’ s contempt for the downtrodden should be enough to merit outrage from “ cancel culture ” warriors .
And it is easy to see how the eugenics she so passionately supported would logically be used against people of color in a society where racism was common .
Racist exploitation is clearly visible in historical examples of doctors tricking non-English speakers into signing sterilization papers and welfare offices withholding payments from women who would not submit to sterilization .
65 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in North Carolina were Black .
A 1974 pamphlet arguing against these practices rightly declared : “ FORCED STERILIZATION IS RACISM IN PRACTICE.
” Responding to these arguments , some say Sanger was a “ woman of her time ” and that we shouldn ’ t judge her for being a eugenicist since it was a very popular view ( an argument the Smithsonian makes ) and forced sterilizations were legal .
But by that logic , how can we judge Christopher Columbus , who was also a “ man of his time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ facilitate was both popular and legal under Spanish law .
Others will say that Sanger ’ s contributions to society , especially her promotion of contraception , justify celebrating her in spite of her other negative qualities .
But if that ’ s the case , then surely the contributions of America ’ s Founding Fathers justifies their celebration , despite the fact that they owned slaves and , in Jefferson ’ s case , fathered children with some of them .
So , defenders of cancel culture have a choice if they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ either condemn Margaret Sanger along most historical figures who do not meet their twenty-first century ideological purity tests , or they can abandon a reflexive , uncritical “ cancel culture ” entirely .
Personally , I think they should do the latter and view historical figures as human beings with vices and virtues , and save their condemnations for figures whose vices grossly outweigh any virtues they might have had .
If they do that , they will see that celebrating a woman like Margaret Sanger who considered many poor minorities to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the claim that “ Black Lives Matter ” ( By the way , Nancy Pelosi should return that Margaret Sanger award she got from Planned Parenthood in 2014 ) .
Sanger only valued the lives of the “ fittest.
” Basic decency requires that we value all human beings , who each possess a dignity that comes with being made in the image and likeness of God .

However, the defenders of this “cancel culture” have forgotten to include one person in their purge: Margaret Sanger, who founded what would later become Planned Parenthood. Sanger is featured in the Smithsonian National Portrait Gallery , has a square named after her in New York , and an award Planned Parenthood has given politicians and activists for nearly fifty years.
You’ve probably seen people on the news tear down statues and demand buildings be renamed that have any reference to past injustice. This includes not just notorious figures, but also people long considered heroes like George Washington , Thomas Jefferson , and Fr. Junipero Serra .
Sanger’s legacy includes truly horrible treatment of people of color. But before we make this case, we have to clear up some “fake news” about Sanger:
The quote “Slavs, Latin and Hebrew immigrants are human weeds. Blacks, soldiers and Jews are a menace to the race.,” appears to be apocryphal as it cannot be located in Sanger’s writings (though, as we’ll see, she does call the poor and disabled “human weeds”).
Another quote, “The mass of ignorant Negroes still breed carelessly and disastrously, so that the increase among Negroes, even more than the increase among whites, is from that portion of the population least intelligent and fit, and least able to rear their children properly,” is actually from black socialist W.E.B. Du Bois, who was a contributor to Sanger’s Birth Control Review. Like Sanger and other eugenicists, he believed that only the fittest should be encouraged to reproduce, though it shouldn’t be claimed that he harbored racist motives.
There is a fake picture of Margaret Sanger speaking at a Ku Klux Klan rally circulating online. Sanger did address a women’s auxiliary meeting of the Klan in 1926, which she justified by saying “any aroused group is a good group.” However, in her autobiography she described the experience as being “weird” and doesn’t seem particularly enamored with the group.
So what is the authentic evidence for Sanger’s racism?
The most famous is an excerpt from a letter she wrote to Clarence Gamble about the “Negro Project,” which was an effort to promote access to contraception in black communities. She wrote, “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”
This passage can be read in two ways—either as a warning against revealing her true intent to use contraception in order to eliminate the black race, or as a caution against spreading the false idea that she wanted to exterminate their race and enlisted black ministers to “straighten out” people who arrived at that incorrect conclusion.
The non-racist reading is supported by some of Sanger’s other statements, such as in 1946, when she said “every possible effort should be made to have every Negro child count as a valuable contribution to the future of America.” In a 1945 interview she said she turned down a donation for a birth control clinic because the donor wanted to use contraceptives to eliminate black people.
The Washington Post called this an “inartfully written” sentence, but defenders of cancel culture who routinely ignore intentions and interpret people’s words in the worst possible way are inconsistent if they refuse to do the same with Sanger. But even if Sanger were not racist herself, her actions contributed to systems that greatly harmed blacks and other minorities, which is all that defenders of “cancel culture” need to justify condemning her.
For example, cancelers target Fr. Junipero Serra or Christopher Columbus because they made it possible for other people to exploit indigenous people and infect them with diseases to which they had no immunity. The fact that Serra and Columbus never intended these harms is irrelevant to the critic’s conclusion that these individuals deserve cancellation.
Considering the true and ugly consequences of Sanger’s push for eugenics only strengthens the case. She believed that the disabled, the unintelligent, and criminals were a drain on society and the key to removing them was to prevent their conception. She wrote “Feeblemindedness is the more serious of the problems, because it is an absolute dead weight on the race . . . As it is inheritable, it renders it a deteriorating poison and depreciates the whole quality of a people.”
By “race” Sanger means the human race, but it would be understandable if you associated her words with white supremacy. Eugenicists of Sanger’s time believed “Nordic” humans were the fittest due to their height and relative good health, which turned into the idea that “Aryans” were the only “fit” race. Adolf Hitler told a confidante “I have studied with great interest the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny, in all probability, be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock.”
Similar claims are made by many contributors throughout Sanger’s Birth Control Review. You can’t slide a piece of paper between Hitler’s dehumanizing language and much of Sanger’s own language. She wrote in The New York Times: “the gradual suppression, elimination and eventual extinction, of defective stocks—those human weeds which threaten the blooming of the finest flowers of American civilization.”
Sanger’s primary way to accomplish this was through promoting the voluntary use of contraceptives among the poor and others she viewed as being “unfit.” Surprisingly, she promoted contraception over elective abortion, calling the latter “barbaric” and a “disgrace to civilization.” But she recognized that her voluntary, contraceptive approach could only go so far:
Birth Control is not advanced as a panacea by which past and present evils of dysgenic breeding can be magically eliminated. Possibly drastic and Spartan methods may be forced upon society if it continues complacently to encourage the chance and chaotic breeding that has resulted from our stupidly cruel sentimentalism.
By “drastic methods” she means forced sterilizations. In the same article, she says “In case of refusal [to use birth control] such persons should have a choice of sterilization or isolation. Under no circumstances should the state allow such parents to cast their diseased and demented progeny upon society for the normal and fit to provide for.” This was not a mere dystopian fantasy: in the 1922 case of Buck v Bell the Supreme Court upheld the State’s right to sterilize people against their will. In North Carolina, for example, over 7,000 forced sterilizations took place between 1929 and 1976.
Even without being explicitly racist, Sanger’s contempt for the downtrodden should be enough to merit outrage from “cancel culture” warriors. And it is easy to see how the eugenics she so passionately supported would logically be used against people of color in a society where racism was common.
Racist exploitation is clearly visible in historical examples of doctors tricking non-English speakers into signing sterilization papers and welfare offices withholding payments from women who would not submit to sterilization. 65% of the women who were sterilized in North Carolina were Black. A 1974 pamphlet arguing against these practices rightly declared: “FORCED STERILIZATION IS RACISM IN PRACTICE.”
Responding to these arguments, some say Sanger was a “woman of her time” and that we shouldn’t judge her for being a eugenicist since it was a very popular view (an argument the Smithsonian makes) and forced sterilizations were legal. But by that logic, how can we judge Christopher Columbus, who was also a “man of his time”? The slave trade he helped facilitate was both popular and legal under Spanish law.
Others will say that Sanger’s contributions to society, especially her promotion of contraception, justify celebrating her in spite of her other negative qualities. But if that’s the case, then surely the contributions of America’s Founding Fathers justifies their celebration, despite the fact that they owned slaves and, in Jefferson’s case, fathered children with some of them.
So, defenders of cancel culture have a choice if they want to be consistent: they can either condemn Margaret Sanger along most historical figures who do not meet their twenty-first century ideological purity tests, or they can abandon a reflexive, uncritical “cancel culture” entirely.
Personally, I think they should do the latter and view historical figures as human beings with vices and virtues, and save their condemnations for figures whose vices grossly outweigh any virtues they might have had. If they do that, they will see that celebrating a woman like Margaret Sanger who considered many poor minorities to be “human weeds” is incompatible with the claim that “Black Lives Matter” (By the way, Nancy Pelosi should return that Margaret Sanger award she got from Planned Parenthood in 2014).
Sanger only valued the lives of the “fittest.” Basic decency requires that we value all human beings, who each possess a dignity that comes with being made in the image and likeness of God.


thelibertydaily--2020-07-10--Creepy Joe Biden Refuses to Answer Questions From Reporters But Creeps on Child During Visit to His

Creepy Joe Biden Refuses to Answer Questions From Reporters But Creeps on Child During Visit to His Childhood Home: ‘Who’s That Beautiful Face? How Old?’

Biden on Thursday visited his childhood home in Scranton , Pennsylvania .
As usual , Biden refused to answer questions @ @ @ @ @ Radical Seattle City Councilmember Kshama Sawant Vows to Overthrow the United States and Replace with @ @ @ @ @ But 77-year-old Creepy Joe had plenty of time to creep on children .
Biden was @ @ @ @ @ ’ s hair because he was wearing a mask .
“ Who ’ s that @ @ @ @ @ ?
” Biden said .
Biden knelt down to speak to the child , “ @ @ @ @ @ you , honey .
”

Biden on Thursday visited his childhood home in Scranton, Pennsylvania.
As usual, Biden refused to answer questions from reporters.
REPORTER: “Time for a few questions?”
JOE BIDEN: “No, no.”
REPORTER: “Okay.”
WATCH:
REPORTER: "Time for a few questions?" JOE BIDEN: "No, no." REPORTER: "Okay." pic.twitter.com/hwFqnKr6Cn — Trump War Room – Text TRUMP to 88022 (@TrumpWarRoom) July 9, 2020
But 77-year-old Creepy Joe had plenty of time to creep on children.
Biden was unable to sniff the child’s hair because he was wearing a mask.
“Who’s that beautiful face? How old?” Biden said.
WATCH:
Biden greets Anne Kearns, the current occupant of his childhood home on North Washington Ave in Scranton, from a distance. pic.twitter.com/c3mjQocHKg — Jennifer Epstein (@jeneps) July 9, 2020
Biden knelt down to speak to the child, “It was great to see you, honey.”


thelibertydaily--2020-07-10--Anti-Life Democrat Joe Biden Says He Will Continue Harassment of Little Sisters of the Poor if Elect

Anti-Life Democrat Joe Biden Says He Will Continue Harassment of Little Sisters of the Poor if Elected on the Day After they Won a Supreme Court Ruling

President Trump invited the Little Sisters of the Poor to the White House .
On Tuesday the Little Sisters of the Poor , a Catholic religious group for women who have dedicated their lives to the service of the elderly , won their Supreme Court case against the Obama administration and their contraceptive mandate in Obamacare .
SCOTUS ruled the Catholic order of nuns can not be forced to take part in providing cost-free contraceptives to employees .
Far left Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayer were the lone dissenting voices in the case .
TRENDING : Radical Seattle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the United States and Replace with `` a Socialist World '' In 2015 the Little Sisters of the Poor were concerned that after more than a century of service in the country the Obama Administration would force them out of the United States .
The order was previously banned in China and Myanmar .
The Obama Administration was forcing them out of the United States by demanding they pay for birth control that goes against their religious beliefs .
The religious order claimed the so-called contraception mandate in ObamaCare will make it impossible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the United States .
The Little Sisters of the Poor serve elderly Americans .
On Wednesday Joe Biden vowed to reinstate Obama-era policies that would require the Little Sisters of the Poor to pay for contraception .
This was the day after the Little Sisters of the Poor won at the Supreme Court .
Joe Biden says he is a Catholic .
Former vice president Joe Biden pledged on Wednesday to reinstate Obama-era policies that would require the Little Sisters of the Poor to ensure access to birth control and abortifacients for employees @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden , who is the presumptive Democratic nominee for president , made the promise July 8 , following the Supreme Court decision in favor of the Little Sisters of the Poor in the case Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania , which upheld an exemption for the sisters from the “ contraception mandate ” which obliges employers to provide for contraceptive coverage for employees through their health care plans .
“ If I am elected I will restore the Obama-Biden policy that existed before the [ Supreme Court ’ s 2014 ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for houses of worship and an accommodation for nonprofit organizations with religious missions , ” said Biden in a statement released by his campaign .

President Trump invited the Little Sisters of the Poor to the White House.
On Tuesday the Little Sisters of the Poor, a Catholic religious group for women who have dedicated their lives to the service of the elderly, won their Supreme Court case against the Obama administration and their contraceptive mandate in Obamacare.
SCOTUS ruled the Catholic order of nuns cannot be forced to take part in providing cost-free contraceptives to employees.
Far left Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayer were the lone dissenting voices in the case.
BREAKING: Little Sisters of the Poor win their SCOTUS case – cannot be forced to take part in providing cost-free contraceptives to employees. Court finds the Trump admin’s regulatory solution for the nuns was properly done. J. Thomas writes 4 majority, J. Ginsburg/Soto dissent — Shannon Bream (@ShannonBream) July 8, 2020
In 2015 the Little Sisters of the Poor were concerned that after more than a century of service in the country the Obama Administration would force them out of the United States. The order was previously banned in China and Myanmar. The Obama Administration was forcing them out of the United States by demanding they pay for birth control that goes against their religious beliefs.
The religious order claimed the so-called contraception mandate in ObamaCare will make it impossible for them to continue their work in the United States.
The Little Sisters of the Poor serve elderly Americans.
On Wednesday Joe Biden vowed to reinstate Obama-era policies that would require the Little Sisters of the Poor to pay for contraception.
This was the day after the Little Sisters of the Poor won at the Supreme Court.
Joe Biden says he is a Catholic.
Catholic News Agency reported:


thelibertydaily--2020-07-10--RINO Never Trumper, Former McCain Campaign Manager Steve Schmidt: Trump ‘Has The Blood of Over 100,0

RINO Never Trumper, Former McCain Campaign Manager Steve Schmidt: Trump ‘Has The Blood of Over 100,000 Americans on His Hands’

Steve Schmidt , known for being John McCain 's presidential campaign manager in 2008 , appeared on MSNBC 's `` Deadline : on Wednesday .
He claimed that President Donald Trump “ has the blood of over a hundred thousand Americans on his hands ” because of his administration ’ s handling of the coronavirus pandemic .
Uh , what ?
This guy is cuckoo !
Schmidt said , “ I think Republicans are part of a coalition that wants to turn Donald Trump out of office because he ’ s the worst president in the history of the country @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the security of the country .
And we have absolutely zero chance , and by zero chance I mean z-e-r-o , zero chance of moving past this with Donald Trump in that job . ''
He continued , `` He is completely unfit for it .
He is unfit mentally .
He is unfit physically .
He is unfit intellectually .
He is a conspiracy theorist who has the blood of over a hundred thousand Americans on his hands , because of the incompetence and the ineptitude in the response to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ country in the world is the epicenter of this , and there ’ s one reason , and that ’ s presidential incompetence .
Full stop.
” “ Secondly , when you look at the Russian bounties when you look at his disloyalty and treachery towards the men and women that he ’ s sworn to command as commander in chief , the men and women who come from every race and creed , every corner of the country , the American people should not tolerate this .
He has assaulted our institutions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ '' Schmidt added .
`` He has assailed the constitutional order .
He has weakened the checks and balances .
He has been a force for illiberal liberalism .
We see his assaults on our allies and the weakening of the American position until four years in , we stand at a moment of abject American weakness and tragedy that can ’ t end until he ’ s gone , and that ’ s why there ’ s so many groups out there telling the truth on Donald Trump , trying to convince @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re fired , '' he concluded .
Don Lemon Has an Idea to Fix Mount Rushmore There was zero debate over Mount Rushmore until President Trump was elected .
It was almost unanimously considered a national treasure .
You can take a look back at when former President Barack Obama visited the historic monument and hear the media talk about how amazing and beautiful it is .
Oregon Politician Shares 'Racist Hate Letter ' Turns Out He Wrote the Letter Himself If there is so much hate and oppression in America , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cook up these hate crime hoaxes like this fake `` racist hate letter . ''
If there were so much hate and racism in this country would n't there be a new story popping up every hour ?
There 's not , so scumbags like this create them .
Democrat Mayor 's Brother Steals Car With Two Kids Inside – `` Do n't Worry , I 'm The Mayor 's Brother '' The little brother of Mayor Frank Scott Jr. of Little Rock , Arkansas is now facing some heavy prison time .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ felony theft as well as two counts of kidnapping .
I feel like we are getting ever so close to learning much more of Jeffrey Epstein 's many heinous crimes now that Ghislaine Maxwell is in custody .
Just before 4th of July weekend , Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested by the FBI and charged with several crimes , including sex trafficking .
Maxwell was a girlfriend of Epstein ’ s for many years and has been accused of identifying and procuring girls for Epstein .
On the 4th of July weekend , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` black militia '' assembled at Stone Mountain Park in Georgia .
They marched up and down the road near cars that were waiting to get into the park .
This past weekend on MSNBC , they had a guest on the AM Joy program who was praising the looters for coming out and ransacking stores like Target .
He said that they actually deserved to be targeted and that looters simply got a bad rap during the protests .

Steve Schmidt: Trump ‘Has The Blood of Over 100,000 Americans on His Hands’
Steve Schmidt, known for being John McCain's presidential campaign manager in 2008, appeared on MSNBC's "Deadline: on Wednesday. He claimed that President Donald Trump “has the blood of over a hundred thousand Americans on his hands” because of his administration’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic.
Uh, what? This guy is cuckoo!
Schmidt said, “I think Republicans are part of a coalition that wants to turn Donald Trump out of office because he’s the worst president in the history of the country. He’s a profound threat to the security of the country. And we have absolutely zero chance, and by zero chance I mean z-e-r-o, zero chance of moving past this with Donald Trump in that job."
He continued, "He is completely unfit for it. He is unfit mentally. He is unfit physically. He is unfit intellectually. He is a conspiracy theorist who has the blood of over a hundred thousand Americans on his hands, because of the incompetence and the ineptitude in the response to the coronavirus. The leading math and science country in the world is the epicenter of this, and there’s one reason, and that’s presidential incompetence. Full stop.”
“Secondly, when you look at the Russian bounties when you look at his disloyalty and treachery towards the men and women that he’s sworn to command as commander in chief, the men and women who come from every race and creed, every corner of the country, the American people should not tolerate this. He has assaulted our institutions. He has desecrated his office," Schmidt added.
"He has assailed the constitutional order. He has weakened the checks and balances. He has been a force for illiberal liberalism. We see his assaults on our allies and the weakening of the American position until four years in, we stand at a moment of abject American weakness and tragedy that can’t end until he’s gone, and that’s why there’s so many groups out there telling the truth on Donald Trump, trying to convince these Republican voters to say, you’re fired," he concluded.
Trending Political News
Don Lemon Has an Idea to Fix Mount Rushmore
There was zero debate over Mount Rushmore until President Trump was elected. It was almost unanimously considered a national treasure.
You can take a look back at when former President Barack Obama visited the historic monument and hear the media talk about how amazing and beautiful it is.
Continue reading…
Oregon Politician Shares 'Racist Hate Letter' Turns Out He Wrote the Letter Himself
If there is so much hate and oppression in America, then why is it so necessary to cook up these hate crime hoaxes like this fake "racist hate letter."
If there were so much hate and racism in this country wouldn't there be a new story popping up every hour? There's not, so scumbags like this create them.
Continue reading...
Democrat Mayor's Brother Steals Car With Two Kids Inside – "Don't Worry, I'm The Mayor's Brother"
The little brother of Mayor Frank Scott Jr. of Little Rock, Arkansas is now facing some heavy prison time.
Darrell Lamont Scott is being charged with felony theft as well as two counts of kidnapping.
Continue reading…
BOMBSHELL! Ghislaine Maxwell Allegedly Has Secret Video Footage of High Profile Perpetrator
I feel like we are getting ever so close to learning much more of Jeffrey Epstein's many heinous crimes now that Ghislaine Maxwell is in custody.
Just before 4th of July weekend, Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested by the FBI and charged with several crimes, including sex trafficking. Maxwell was a girlfriend of Epstein’s for many years and has been accused of identifying and procuring girls for Epstein.
Continue reading…
WATCH: Armed Black Militia 'Soldiers' Demand Reparations From White Motorists
On the 4th of July weekend, a group of armed individuals calling themselves the "black militia" assembled at Stone Mountain Park in Georgia.
They marched up and down the road near cars that were waiting to get into the park.
Continue reading…
Unbelievable! MSNBC: ‘Thank Goodness For The Looters’ (VIDEO)
This past weekend on MSNBC, they had a guest on the AM Joy program who was praising the looters for coming out and ransacking stores like Target.
He said that they actually deserved to be targeted and that looters simply got a bad rap during the protests.
Continue reading…


thelibertydaily--2020-07-10--Actually, Yes, Don Lemon, Jesus Was Perfect . . . and That’s Not All You Got Wrong . . .

CNN host Don Lemon said it : “ But here ’ s the thing , Jesus Christ , if that ’ s who you believe in Jesus Christ , admittedly was not perfect when he was here on the Earth .
So why are we deifying the Founders ?
” I know what you ’ re thinking : I ’ m going to tell you he was wrong about Jesus .
Well , of course I am !
What ’ s really amazing , though , is that as bad as that was , he managed to fit one more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whopper .
Let ’ s start with the most important thing .
Actually , yes , Jesus was perfect .
Every early record we have says so .
No early record contradicts it .
I know , I know , that record is “ a story , ” the skeptics will say , and , “ It ’ s easy to tell a story where someone ’ s perfect.
” Ri-i-i-ight .
Just try to name another one .
Name one whose main character is perfect in His love .
Perfect in His @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Perfect in His death .
We don ’ t even need to get into His resurrection — not that it isn ’ t real , but by now you ’ ve already reached the answer : Stories about perfect characters aren ’ t easy after all .
And if you ’ re still not sure about it , well , the book I wrote about this just went to press this week : Too Good to be False : How Jesus Incomparable Character Reveals His Reality .
( I can only give you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ until it releases in a few weeks . )
How To Be Really Wrong About Jesus Not only is it hard to make up a perfect story , you should see just how unlikely the skeptics ’ version of who “ made it up ” is .
They think a muddled “ faith community ” kicked it off , and that a Telephone Game took care of most of the rest of it .
And they think that ’ s where the only truly perfect character in all history and literature came from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The record says he ’ s wrong .
And even though that record comes to us in the form of a story — four interconnected ones , the four Gospels — there ’ s every reason to believe the record is accurate .
There ’ s no reason to think the skeptics have explained it away , anyway .
Jesus was the one perfect Person ever to walk the earth .
That ’ s the most important of the three odd things he said there .
Now the least important : “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if that ’ s who you believe in Jesus Christ , admittedly was not perfect.
” Now , admittedly , I ’ ll say throwaway words I don ’ t really mean sometimes .
Maybe that ’ s what that was for Don Lemon .
It ’ s just odd , that ’ s all .
If I say “ admittedly , ” I ’ m admitting something that ’ s true of me .
I don ’ t know Don Lemon ’ s religious beliefs , but the way he phrased “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in , ” it sounds to me like he ’ s admitting someone else ’ s opinion .
Could it be that he thinks that ’ s a standard Christian belief ?
It ’ s odd , that ’ s all .
It struck me enough to be worth a quick comment .
I won ’ t make anything more of it than that .
” So Why Are We Deifying the Founders ?
” But when he asks , “ So why are we deifying the Founders ?
” that question isn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s a rhetorical trick , whose purpose is to make conservatives look stupid .
Like “ Whoa , you think they were so perfect.
” Could it be just an innocent figure of speech ?
Mere hyperbole ?
Maybe — if he hadn ’ t framed it alongside Jesus .
But he did , and for that reason the figure of speech falls flat , as far as I ’ m concerned .
Let ’ s make sure the standard of comparison is clear .
First , nobody deified Jesus .
He didn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ God from the beginning before all beginnings .
One reason we know that ’ s true ( there are many reasons ) is because of His perfection on earth .
Perfection is a quality of deity alone .
He lived perfection because that was who He was .
Please Support The Stream : Equipping Christians to Think Clearly About the Political , Economic and Moral Issues of Our Day .
But good grief , who ’ s deifying the Founders ?
Who ever claimed they were perfect ?
Who ever said they had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thing : People who think highly of the Founders tend to be fairly well concentrated among people who think Jesus was uniquely perfect , and that therefore no one else is .
Including the Founders .
Isn ’ t it possible instead to respect the Founders for devising the best system of government ever ?
Can ’ t we recognize them for that , even though not one of them was Jesus Christ ?
Can ’ t we credit them for advancing humanity leagues down the road toward a just society , even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all the way to the end ?
The end which believers in Jesus know won ’ t really arrive until He returns ?
Yet One More Oddity There ’ s one more odd thing going on here .
( Don Lemon didn ’ t say it , so I didn ’ t count it in my list of three . )
The establishment of Jesus ’ day crucified Him because He threatened them .
He showed they weren ’ t all they claimed themselves to be .
They thought they were great , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jesus was human , but He wasn ’ t only human ; He was God in the flesh .
And that ticked off the local leaders , so they crucified Him .
Because He was perfect .
America ’ s founders were only human .
They were as wise and just as any governmental leaders the world had seen up to that day , but again , only human .
So now the left is crucifying them .
Because they weren ’ t perfect .
Tom Gilson ( @ TomGilsonAuthor ) is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ author or editor of six books , including the forthcoming Too Good To Be False : How Jesus ’ Incomparable Character Reveals His Reality .

CNN host Don Lemon said it: “But here’s the thing, Jesus Christ, if that’s who you believe in Jesus Christ, admittedly was not perfect when he was here on the Earth. So why are we deifying the Founders?”
I know what you’re thinking: I’m going to tell you he was wrong about Jesus. Well, of course I am! What’s really amazing, though, is that as bad as that was, he managed to fit one more oddity in there, and another total whopper.
Actually, Jesus Was Perfect
Let’s start with the most important thing. Actually, yes, Jesus was perfect. Every early record we have says so. No early record contradicts it.
I know, I know, that record is “a story,” the skeptics will say, and, “It’s easy to tell a story where someone’s perfect.” Ri-i-i-ight. Just try to name another one. Name one whose main character is perfect in His love. Perfect in His teaching. Perfect in His debates. Perfect in His death. We don’t even need to get into His resurrection — not that it isn’t real, but by now you’ve already reached the answer: Stories about perfect characters aren’t easy after all.
And if you’re still not sure about it, well, the book I wrote about this has just become available for pre-order: Too Good to be False: How Jesus Incomparable Character Reveals His Reality. (I can only give you a tiny taste of it now, until it releases in a few weeks.)
How To Be Really Wrong About Jesus
Not only is it hard to make up a perfect story, you should see just how unlikely the skeptics’ version of who “made it up” is. They think a muddled “faith community” kicked it off, and that a Telephone Game took care of most of the rest of it. And they think that’s where the only truly perfect character in all history and literature came from? Really?
Back to Don Lemon. The record says he’s wrong. And even though that record comes to us in the form of a story — four interconnected ones, the four Gospels — there’s every reason to believe the record is accurate. There’s no reason to think the skeptics have explained it away, anyway. Jesus was the one perfect Person ever to walk the earth.
(And if you say I haven’t made the case completely here, of course I haven’t. That’s why I wrote a book on it. Bide your time, bide your time….)
“Admittedly”??
That’s the most important of the three odd things he said there. Now the least important: “Admittedly,” as in, “if that’s who you believe in Jesus Christ, admittedly was not perfect.”
Now, admittedly, I’ll say throwaway words I don’t really mean sometimes. Maybe that’s what that was for Don Lemon. It’s just odd, that’s all. If I say “admittedly,” I’m admitting something that’s true of me. I don’t know Don Lemon’s religious beliefs, but the way he phrased “if that’s who you believe in,” it sounds to me like he’s admitting someone else’s opinion. Could it be that he thinks that’s a standard Christian belief?
It’s odd, that’s all. It struck me enough to be worth a quick comment. I won’t make anything more of it than that.
“So Why Are We Deifying the Founders?”
But when he asks, “So why are we deifying the Founders?” that question isn’t just odd. It’s a rhetorical trick, whose purpose is to make conservatives look stupid. Like “Whoa, you think they were so perfect.”
Could it be just an innocent figure of speech? Mere hyperbole? Maybe — if he hadn’t framed it alongside Jesus. But he did, and for that reason the figure of speech falls flat, as far as I’m concerned.
Let’s make sure the standard of comparison is clear. First, nobody deified Jesus. He didn’t need deifying; He was God from the beginning before all beginnings. One reason we know that’s true (there are many reasons) is because of His perfection on earth. Perfection is a quality of deity alone. He lived perfection because that was who He was.
Please Support The Stream : Equipping Christians to Think Clearly About the Political, Economic, and Moral Issues of Our Day.
But good grief, who’s deifying the Founders? Who ever claimed they were perfect? Who ever said they had to be anywhere near it? Funny thing: People who think highly of the Founders tend to be fairly well concentrated among people who think Jesus was uniquely perfect, and that therefore no one else is. Including the Founders.
Isn’t it possible instead to respect the Founders for devising the best system of government ever? Can’t we recognize them for that, even though not one of them was Jesus Christ? Can’t we credit them for advancing humanity leagues down the road toward a just society, even if they didn’t take it all the way to the end? The end which believers in Jesus know won’t really arrive until He returns?
Yet One More Oddity
There’s one more odd thing going on here. (Don Lemon didn’t say it, so I didn’t count it in my list of three.) The establishment of Jesus’ day crucified Him because He threatened them. He showed they weren’t all they claimed themselves to be. They thought they were great, until someone actually perfect came along.
Jesus was human, but He wasn’t only human; He was God in the flesh. And that ticked off the local leaders, so they crucified Him. Because He was perfect.
America’s founders were only human. They were as wise and just as any governmental leaders the world had seen up to that day, but again, only human. So now the left is crucifying them. Because they weren’t perfect.
Tom Gilson (@TomGilsonAuthor) is a senior editor with The Stream and the author or editor of six books, including the forthcoming Too Good To Be False: How Jesus’ Incomparable Character Reveals His Reality.


thelibertydaily--2020-07-10--Cult Programming in Democrat Seattle

Cult Programming in Democrat Seattle

For Foster Kids , a Step in the Right Direction A new executive order requires more vigorous data collection for @ @ @ @ @ take in unwanted children .

Last month, the City of Seattle’s Office of Civil Rights sent an email inviting “white City employees” to attend a training session on “Interrupting Internalized Racial Superiority and Whiteness,” a program designed to help white workers examine their “complicity in the system of white supremacy” and “interrupt racism in ways that are accountable to Black, Indigenous and People of Color.” Hoping to learn more, I submitted a public records request for all documentation related to the training. The results are disturbing.
At the beginning of the session, the trainers explain that white people have internalized a sense of racial superiority, which has made them unable to access their “humanity” and caused “harm and violence” to people of color. The trainers claim that “individualism,” “perfectionism,” “intellectualization,” and “objectivity” are all vestiges of this internalized racial oppression and must be abandoned in favor of social-justice principles. In conceptual terms, the city frames the discussion around the idea that black Americans are reducible to the essential quality of “blackness” and white Americans are reducible to the essential quality of “whiteness”—that is, the new metaphysics of good and evil.
Once the diversity trainers have established this basic conceptual framework, they encourage white employees to “practice self-talk that affirms [their] complicity in racism” and work on “undoing [their] own whiteness.” As part of this process, white employees must abandon their “white normative behavior” and learn to let go of their “comfort,” “physical safety,” “social status,” and “relationships with some other white people.” As writer James Lindsay has pointed out, this is not the language of human resources; it is the language of cult programming—persuading members they are defective in some predefined manner, exploiting their emotional vulnerabilities, and isolating them from previous relationships.
It’s important to point out that this “interrupting whiteness” training is not an anomaly. In recent years, nearly every department of Seattle city government has been recruited into the ideological fight against “white supremacy.” As I have documented, the city’s homelessness agency hosted a conference on how to “decolonize [their] collective work”; the school system released a curriculum explaining that “math is a tool for oppression”; and the city-owned power company hired a team of bureaucrats to fight “structural racism” within their organization. Dozens of private companies now offer diversity training to public agencies. The idea that all whites have unconscious, “implicit bias” that they must vigilantly program themselves to overcome has become an article of faith across corporate boardrooms, academia, and law-enforcement agencies, even though the premise is unscientific and impossible to verify.
The endgame is to make Seattle’s municipal government the arbiter of the new orthodoxy, and then work outward. At the end of the session on “internalized racial superiority,” the diversity trainers outline strategies for converting outsiders and recommend specific “practices for interrupting others’ whiteness.” In effect, the activists have organized an ideological pyramid scheme—using public dollars to establish their authority within the government, then using that authority to recruit others into the program. As Lindsay writes, “the goal is no longer to indoctrinate on what is ‘rightthink’ and ‘wrongthink.’ It is to make the [subject’s] thinking be completely in line with the view of the world described by the cult doctrine.”
How far can this racial-justice shakedown extend itself? The new racial orthodoxy has seen exponential growth in the past few years and has proved extremely difficult for local governments and elite institutions to resist. The movement’s key rhetorical premise is designed as a trap: if you are not an “antiracist,” then you are a “racist”—and must be held to account. Skeptics might dismiss Seattle’s “interrupting whiteness” training as a West Coast oddity, but it is part of a nationwide movement to make this kind of identity politics the foundation of our public discourse. It may be coming soon to a city or town near you.
Photo by David Ryder/Getty Images


thelibertydaily--2020-07-10--Major League Baseball Saturates Social Media with Propaganda Posts Supporting the Communist Front Gr

Major League Baseball Saturates Social Media with Propaganda Posts Supporting the Communist Front Group Calling Itself “Black Lives Matter”

Major League Baseball ’ s social media accounts have gone woke , with dozens of Black Lives Matter posts from the league and players alike .
Pro baseball escaped from much of the anthem kneeling controversies in 2016 and 2017 by steering clear of wokeness for the most part .
But that seems to be coming to an end if the league ’ s Twitter account is any indication of where baseball is headed .
MLB ’ s Twitter feed is filled with paeans to Black Lives Matter that have been given the MLB endorsement with official posts and re-tweets @ @ @ @ @ @ @ took a knee during the anthem over the years since former NFL player Colin Kaepernick began protesting during the anthem in 2016 , the anthem protests largely went unobserved in baseball .
But , if the league ’ s Twitter account can be taken as indicative of the league ’ s direction , MLB may be signaling that kneeling during the anthem will be accepted and maybe even encouraged going forward .
On Thursday morning , the league re-tweeted a statement by St. Louis Cardinals pitcher Jack Flaherty ’ s statements approving the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But Flaherty ’ s appreciation of protesting against the country during the anthem is far from the only Black Lives Matter-styled message on MLB ’ s official Twitter account .
The account is liberally strewn with such messages .
There are many , many more like these above .
In a side note , the MLB account is also heavily pushing the idea of mask wearing : In the end , it appears that any hope that Major League Baseball could remain relatively free of wokeness has been demolished .

Major League Baseball’s social media accounts have gone woke, with dozens of Black Lives Matter posts from the league and players alike.
Pro baseball escaped from much of the anthem kneeling controversies in 2016 and 2017 by steering clear of wokeness for the most part. But that seems to be coming to an end if the league’s Twitter account is any indication of where baseball is headed.
MLB’s Twitter feed is filled with paeans to Black Lives Matter that have been given the MLB endorsement with official posts and re-tweets.
While the league had some that took a knee during the anthem over the years since former NFL player Colin Kaepernick began protesting during the anthem in 2016, the anthem protests largely went unobserved in baseball.
But, if the league’s Twitter account can be taken as indicative of the league’s direction, MLB may be signaling that kneeling during the anthem will be accepted and maybe even encouraged going forward.
On Thursday morning, the league re-tweeted a statement by St. Louis Cardinals pitcher Jack Flaherty’s statements approving the act of kneeling during the anthem.
Jack Flaherty speaks about kneeling during the national anthem. pic.twitter.com/0oQxybtNNE — Cut4 (@Cut4) July 9, 2020
But Flaherty’s appreciation of protesting against the country during the anthem is far from the only Black Lives Matter-styled message on MLB’s official Twitter account. The account is liberally strewn with such messages.
The message is loud and clear at Reds camp. #BlackLivesMatter pic.twitter.com/iLuA9oKHVZ — MLB (@MLB) July 8, 2020
I’m going to leave this here, and you guys take what you want from it. But I will continue to do what i feel is right. pic.twitter.com/cj5D5a4ux3 — CountOnAG (@Amir_Garrett) June 30, 2020
It’s time for us to listen to the words of Dexter Fowler. pic.twitter.com/OIIS2yTii5 — MLB (@MLB) June 30, 2020
It’s time for us to listen to the words of Anthony Alford. pic.twitter.com/POZv51K5CX — MLB (@MLB) June 30, 2020
Thoughtful. Passionate. Teammate. Husband. Father. Ian, we support you in your decision and know your family loves you for it. Stay home, stay safe, be well. pic.twitter.com/xWwaLaayNq — Colorado Rockies 😷 (@Rockies) June 30, 2020
There are many, many more like these above.
In a side note, the MLB account is also heavily pushing the idea of mask wearing:
Be a Hall of Famer. WEAR A MASK! Available from @obvious_shirts at https://t.co/zpwVDXtacm pic.twitter.com/J1mil2PYNh — Fergie Jenkins (@fergieajenkins) July 5, 2020
Be an All-Star, wear a mask. pic.twitter.com/AJ0qA5eyXH — MLB (@MLB) July 5, 2020
In the end, it appears that any hope that Major League Baseball could remain relatively free of wokeness has been demolished.
Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at: facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.


thelibertydaily--2020-07-10--Brit Hume: If Biden Wins in November, Republicans Will Be Out of Power for a Long Time

Brit Hume was on with Tucker Carlson tonight to discuss Trump , Biden , and the upcoming election in November , and said that if Biden wins in November it would likely mean that Republicans would keep losing for several election cycles : A victory for Joe Biden this fall will likely put Republicans out of power for a long , long time , Fox News political analyst Brit Hume warned .
Hume said on Thursday that President Trump ’ s ability to sway voters into supporting his candidacy for a new kind of leadership may backfire if people turn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ future .
“ Trump was elected in an overwhelming response from people who said , ‘ I ’ ve had enough , I don ’ t want any more of this , ’ and he ’ s governed as a disruptor , ” Hume said told Fox News ’ s Tucker Carlson Tonight .
“ If this swings back this quickly , it is a little hard for me to see it swinging back in the other direction for quite some time , so I think this election is different .
This is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that many analysts and pundits agree that the election will be a close one with the country largely divided politically .
He also said the Trump campaign needs to step up and pick and choose its battles wisely , referring most recently to the Fourth of July .
Hume , who praised Trump ’ s recent Mount Rushmore speech on Independence Day , said he was disappointed he didn ’ t continue that message moving forward and instead chided NASCAR racer Bubba Wallace on Twitter , accusing him of staging a “ hoax @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a noose in his garage .
“ He has opportunities here .
He has chances , ” Hume said .
“ The sheer leftward drift of [ the Democratic Party ] and the outright leftism of its agenda seems to present opportunities if the Trump campaign and Trump himself can capitalize on them .
It remains to be seen if he can or will and can stop talking about himself long enough to talk about something else and talk about their agenda and his message .
”

Brit Hume was on with Tucker Carlson tonight to discuss Trump, Biden, and the upcoming election in November, and said that if Biden wins in November it would likely mean that Republicans would keep losing for several election cycles:
Watch the latest video at foxnews.com
Here’s more from DC Examiner:
A victory for Joe Biden this fall will likely put Republicans out of power for a long, long time, Fox News political analyst Brit Hume warned.
Hume said on Thursday that President Trump’s ability to sway voters into supporting his candidacy for a new kind of leadership may backfire if people turn to a more progressive agenda in the future.
“Trump was elected in an overwhelming response from people who said, ‘I’ve had enough, I don’t want any more of this,’ and he’s governed as a disruptor,” Hume said told Fox News’s Tucker Carlson Tonight. “If this swings back this quickly, it is a little hard for me to see it swinging back in the other direction for quite some time, so I think this election is different. This is big. No doubt.”
Hume noted that many analysts and pundits agree that the election will be a close one with the country largely divided politically. He also said the Trump campaign needs to step up and pick and choose its battles wisely, referring most recently to the Fourth of July.
Hume, who praised Trump’s recent Mount Rushmore speech on Independence Day, said he was disappointed he didn’t continue that message moving forward and instead chided NASCAR racer Bubba Wallace on Twitter, accusing him of staging a “hoax” regarding his allegation that there was a noose in his garage.
“He has opportunities here. He has chances,” Hume said. “The sheer leftward drift of [the Democratic Party] and the outright leftism of its agenda seems to present opportunities if the Trump campaign and Trump himself can capitalize on them. It remains to be seen if he can or will and can stop talking about himself long enough to talk about something else and talk about their agenda and his message.”


thelibertydaily--2020-07-10--Texas’ Lt.Gov Dan Patrick Says BLM Is A Communist Organization Taking Over the Education System to I

Texas’ Lt.Gov Dan Patrick Says BLM Is A Communist Organization Taking Over the Education System to Indoctrinate Kids and Turn Them Against Their Parents [VIDEO]

Tucker Carlson rips the mask off the Democrat party : He ’ s gone full constitutional warrior , tackling the Democrat ’ s cynicism , and calling out the dual leftist practices of violence and censorship .
Every day , Carlson is better than the day before CLOWN WORLD : Study Finds 92 % Of Leftist Are Actually Basement Dwelling Adult Children A Study Found 92 % of Left-Wing Activists Still Live with Parents , and It ’ s Not Likely to Get Better They ’ re marching down the street wearing black , their faces obscured by red bandanas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ They ’ re intimidating as they create a mob and chase after you , calling you a fascist and a Nazi because you don ’ t share their extreme ideology .
They ’ re marching down the street bashing in car windows and vandalizing storefronts .
They ’ re going to do all it takes to stop fascism and hate speech .
But they have to hurry this along because they have to be home before 10:30 , or else their mom will be totally pissed off .
This is a likely story @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this is not a new story .
In fact , the Daily Mail published these findings back in 2017 which showed that 92 percent of leftist activists who were arrested in Berlin still live with their parents , and what ’ s more , a third are completely unemployed : “ The figures , which were published in daily newspaper Bild revealed that 873 suspects were investigated by authorities between 2003 and 2013 .
Of these 84 per cent were men , and 72 per cent were aged between 18 and 29 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ made in the Berlin districts of Friedrichshain , Kreuzberg and Mitte , mostly during demonstrations .
A third of them were unemployed , and 92 per cent still live with their parents .
”

Tucker Carlson rips the mask off the Democrat party: He’s gone full constitutional warrior, tackling the Democrat’s cynicism, and calling out the dual leftist practices of violence and censorship. Every day, Carlson is better than the day before
CLOWN WORLD: Study Finds 92% Of Leftist Are Actually Basement Dwelling Adult Children
A Study Found 92% of Left-Wing Activists Still Live with Parents, and It’s Not Likely to Get Better
They’re marching down the street wearing black, their faces obscured by red bandanas or possibly a Guy Fawkes mask. They’re intimidating as they create a mob and chase after you, calling you a fascist and a Nazi because you don’t share their extreme ideology. They’re marching down the street bashing in car windows and vandalizing storefronts. They’re going to do all it takes to stop fascism and hate speech.
But they have to hurry this along because they have to be home before 10:30, or else their mom will be totally pissed off.
This is a likely story according to a Berlin study, but this is not a new story. In fact, the Daily Mail published these findings back in 2017 which showed that 92 percent of leftist activists who were arrested in Berlin still live with their parents, and what’s more, a third are completely unemployed:
“The figures, which were published in daily newspaper Bild revealed that 873 suspects were investigated by authorities between 2003 and 2013.
Of these 84 per cent were men, and 72 per cent were aged between 18 and 29.
More than half of the arrests were made in the Berlin districts of Friedrichshain, Kreuzberg and Mitte, mostly during demonstrations.
A third of them were unemployed, and 92 per cent still live with their parents.”