thelibertydaily--2020-03-07--Leftists Seth Meyers and Ocrazio-Cortex Smear VP Pence Over Coronavirus

It never ceases to amaze that the very people who deny fundamental biology accuse their political adversaries of rejecting scientific discoveries .
This is precisely the behavior that Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and host Seth Meyers engaged in on Thursday ’ s Late Night .
Meyers , never one to bite his tongue when it comes to political matters , commenced the segment with an arrow directed at President Trump and Vice President Pence ’ s response to the coronavirus : In an effort to supply fodder to Meyer ’ s ultra-leftist audience , Ocasio-Cortez stated affirmatively ; “ No , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have a person that believes in science…in charge… ” Muffled by the cheers of the raucous crowd , Meyers quipped ; “ Sure .
That sounds good.
” Ocasio-Cortez then seized the opportunity to extol her Medicare for All proposal ; “ …Ideally what we have is a person that believes in universal health care and paid sick leave and an agenda that actually- can help prevent the transmission of disease… ” Meyers then made a peculiar segue into the nexus between Medicare for All and the food service industry : Well , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ know , paid sick leave because one of the things that 's been pointed out by a lot of people , especially in the food service industry , these are people with jobs that are very important to them , you know , they 're just making ends meet as it is .
And , you know , they are the ones that are most likely to pass on whatever illness they have to other people and yet they do n't have that opportunity .
If that was difficult to follow , you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elaborate on the correlation : Exactly and the other issue , too , to compound on that , especially in food service , you know , a lot of people know that I used to work in a restaurant .
And that just a couple weeks ago , Stephen Miller and the Trump Administration rolled out a public charge rule against undocumented people .
And many of whom we know work in the food service industry .
And basically , what it says is that if you are seeking medical care , that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proceedings and so the people who feed us are now scared to seek medical care… Meyers then described Ocasio-Cortez ’ s relationship with Senator Sanders as “ surreal ” : One thing that must be surreal for you is 2016 , you knocked on doors for Bernie Sanders…And then two years later you get elected Congresswoman .
Now you are actually on the stump with Bernie .
When you go out on stage for these giant Bernie rallies , does it seem- does it seem as surreal to you that I imagine it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 's completely surreal… ” By the looks of the interview , it seemed that sitting next to Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez was a “ surreal ” experience for lefty Meyers .
SETH MEYERS : One thing that , you know , a lot of people are discussing is who the President has chosen to put in charge of this task force .
He chose Vice President Pence .
Is it safe to assume that you do not think that is the best of his options ?
ALEXANDRIA OCASIO CORTEZ : No , no .
I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that believes in science- OCASIO-CORTEZ : in charge .
Ideally what we have is a person that believes in universal health care and paid sick leave and an agenda that actually- can help prevent the transmission of disease .
MEYERS : Well , it 's interesting you mentioned , you know , paid sick leave because one of the things that 's been pointed out by a lot of people , especially in the food service industry , these are people with jobs that are very important to them you know , they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is .
And , you know , they are the ones that are most likely to pass on whatever illness they have to other people and yet they do n't have that opportunity .
OCASIO-CORTEZ : Exactly and the other issue , too , to compound on that , especially in food service , you know , a lot of people know that I used to work in a restaurant .
And that just a couple weeks ago , Stephen Miller and the Trump Administration rolled out a public charge rule against undocumented @ @ @ @ @ @ @ know work in the food service industry .
And basically , what it says is that if you are seeking medical care , that could be used against you in deportation proceedings and so the people who feed us are now scared to seek medical care .
This is not a situation that befits us as a country and it 's one that , frankly , I think shows that we are as strong as the most vulnerable -- who we allow to be vulnerable and most vulnerable in our society .
MEYERS @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for you is 2016 , you knocked on doors for Bernie Sanders .
MEYERS : And then two years later you get elected Congresswoman .
Now you are actually on the stump with Bernie .
When you go out on stage for these giant Bernie rallies , does it seem- does it seem as surreal to you that I imagine it does ?
OCASIO-CORTEZ : It 's completely surreal just , you know , four years ago I was in the South Bronx as a volunteer , helping organize this massive rally in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time , Bernie Sanders was one of the first Democratic candidates since , I believe Robert F. Kennedy , to campaign in the South Bronx .
And to have a candidate that really saw our community was really impactful and now to be able to go out and bear witness to what so many communities are experiencing all across the country is just very full circle and gratifying .

It never ceases to amaze that the very people who deny fundamental biology accuse their political adversaries of rejecting scientific discoveries. This is precisely the behavior that Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and host Seth Meyers engaged in on Thursday’s Late Night.
Meyers, never one to bite his tongue when it comes to political matters, commenced the segment with an arrow directed at President Trump and Vice President Pence’s response to the coronavirus:
One thing that, you know, a lot of people are discussing is who the President has chosen to put in charge of this task force. He chose Vice President Pence. Is it safe to assume that you do not think that is the best of his options?
In an effort to supply fodder to Meyer’s ultra-leftist audience, Ocasio-Cortez stated affirmatively; “No, no. I think that we should have a person that believes in science…in charge…” Muffled by the cheers of the raucous crowd, Meyers quipped; “Sure. That sounds good.”
Ocasio-Cortez then seized the opportunity to extol her Medicare for All proposal; “…Ideally what we have is a person that believes in universal health care and paid sick leave and an agenda that actually- can help prevent the transmission of disease…”
Meyers then made a peculiar segue into the nexus between Medicare for All and the food service industry:
Well, it's interesting you mentioned, you know, paid sick leave because one of the things that's been pointed out by a lot of people, especially in the food service industry, these are people with jobs that are very important to them, you know, they're just making ends meet as it is. And, you know, they are the ones that are most likely to pass on whatever illness they have to other people and yet they don't have that opportunity.
If that was difficult to follow, you are not alone. Ocasio-Cortez attempted to elaborate on the correlation:
Exactly and the other issue, too, to compound on that, especially in food service, you know, a lot of people know that I used to work in a restaurant. And that just a couple weeks ago, Stephen Miller and the Trump Administration rolled out a public charge rule against undocumented people. And many of whom we know work in the food service industry. And basically, what it says is that if you are seeking medical care, that could be used against you in deportation proceedings and so the people who feed us are now scared to seek medical care…
Meyers then described Ocasio-Cortez’s relationship with Senator Sanders as “surreal”:
One thing that must be surreal for you is 2016, you knocked on doors for Bernie Sanders…And then two years later you get elected Congresswoman. Now you are actually on the stump with Bernie. When you go out on stage for these giant Bernie rallies, does it seem- does it seem as surreal to you that I imagine it does?
Ocasio-Cortez swooned: “…It's completely surreal…”
By the looks of the interview, it seemed that sitting next to Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez was a “surreal” experience for lefty Meyers.
Transcript below:


thelibertydaily--2020-03-07--NY Times’ Lerer Weeps Over Dems’ ‘Two White Men,’ But Slimed Rep. Tulsi Gabbard

Senator Elizabeth Warren ( D-MA ) has dropped out of the presidential race , and The New York Times ( which bizarrely endorsed both Warren and Sen. Amy Klobuchar ) is bitter .
The headline to Friday ’ s front-page “ news analysis ” by Lisa Lerer blamed sexism : “ A Two-Man Race ?
Women Aren ’ t Surprised.
” It began ( click “ expand ” ) : In the end , the pink wave carried two white men ashore .
Since Donald J. Trump won the presidency , women ’ s rage has fueled the Democratic Party @ @ @ @ @ @ @ led protests , ran for office and voted for Democrats more than they ever had before .
A record number of female lawmakers now serve in Congress .
After years of being considered a political liability , Speaker Nancy Pelosi has emerged as a party icon and , in 2020 , multiple women ran for president .
For the first time in history , Americans saw a diverse group of female leaders pursuing the country ’ s highest office , an elite sorority that included former prosecutors , senators , a combat veteran @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the painful punch line : “ And , for the first time in history , a majority of Democratic voters rejected them all .
As the party moves toward picking a nominee , the last man left standing will be , most certainly , a man.
” Reading between the lines , it sounds like Democratic women themselves were at fault for Warren ’ s underperformance : At events for Democratic candidates over the past year , many women said that they were more aware than ever of sexism in their own lives @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because of the # MeToo movement and heightened focus on gender parity .
All of that awareness , though , became an obstacle to electing a female president .
They knew how sexist the world was , some said , and they couldn ’ t take the risk ... .Eighteen percent of Democratic women said that a woman could not win the White House , compared with 7 percent of men , according to a CNN poll in January .
Of course women aren ’ t an ideological feminist monolith and don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what Times reporters want .
And it ’ s not technically a “ Two-Man Race ” either ; a woman still running for president , although Lerer did n't even mention her Friday : Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard ( HI ) , an iconoclastic liberal Democrat with stands across the ideological spectrum .
Lerer ’ s October 2019 hit on Gabbard revealed the reporter ’ s hypocrisy regarding supporting women for high office : “ Left Scratches Its Head And Far Right Swoons At Gabbard Campaign.
” The online headlines summed up Lerer 's @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : “ What , Exactly , Is Tulsi Gabbard Up To ?
As she injects chaos into the 2020 Democratic primary by accusing her own party of “ rigging ” the election , an array of alt-right internet stars , white nationalists and Russians have praised her.
” Sororal treachery ?
Or just another case of liberal hypocrisy by the media , using feminism as a partisan cudgel only when it suits the Democrats ?
Even before Warren dropped out , reporter Jennifer Medina was blaming sexism : “ Electability and an Apology @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as Their Own.
” The text box : “ ‘ Hope almost feels quaint ’ amid familiar double standards .
”

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has dropped out of the presidential race, and The New York Times (which bizarrely endorsed both Warren and Sen. Amy Klobuchar) is bitter. The headline to Friday’s front-page “news analysis” by Lisa Lerer blamed sexism: “A Two-Man Race? Women Aren’t Surprised.” It began (click “expand”):
In the end, the pink wave carried two white men ashore. Since Donald J. Trump won the presidency, women’s rage has fueled the Democratic Party. Women created new political organizations, led protests, ran for office and voted for Democrats more than they ever had before. A record number of female lawmakers now serve in Congress. After years of being considered a political liability, Speaker Nancy Pelosi has emerged as a party icon and, in 2020, multiple women ran for president. For the first time in history, Americans saw a diverse group of female leaders pursuing the country’s highest office, an elite sorority that included former prosecutors, senators, a combat veteran and even a self-help celebrity.
Then the painful punch line: “And, for the first time in history, a majority of Democratic voters rejected them all. As the party moves toward picking a nominee, the last man left standing will be, most certainly, a man.”
Reading between the lines, it sounds like Democratic women themselves were at fault for Warren’s underperformance:
At events for Democratic candidates over the past year, many women said that they were more aware than ever of sexism in their own lives and in the culture at large, because of the #MeToo movement and heightened focus on gender parity. All of that awareness, though, became an obstacle to electing a female president. They knew how sexist the world was, some said, and they couldn’t take the risk....Eighteen percent of Democratic women said that a woman could not win the White House, compared with 7 percent of men, according to a CNN poll in January.
Of course women aren’t an ideological feminist monolith and don’t vote that way, no matter what Times reporters want.
And it’s not technically a “Two-Man Race” either; a woman still running for president, although Lerer didn't even mention her Friday: Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard (HI), an iconoclastic liberal Democrat with stands across the ideological spectrum.
Lerer’s October 2019 hit on Gabbard revealed the reporter’s hypocrisy regarding supporting women for high office: “Left Scratches Its Head And Far Right Swoons At Gabbard Campaign.”
The online headlines summed up Lerer's view that Gabbard had no business running: “What, Exactly, Is Tulsi Gabbard Up To? As she injects chaos into the 2020 Democratic primary by accusing her own party of “rigging” the election, an array of alt-right internet stars, white nationalists and Russians have praised her.”
Sororal treachery? Or just another case of liberal hypocrisy by the media, using feminism as a partisan cudgel only when it suits the Democrats?
Even before Warren dropped out, reporter Jennifer Medina was blaming sexism: “Electability and an Apology: Women See Warren’s Trials as Their Own.” The text box: “‘Hope almost feels quaint’ amid familiar double standards.”


thelibertydaily--2020-03-07--Foreign Spy Christopher Steele Tries to Defend Indefensible, Discredited Phony Dossier Used by Dirty

Foreign Spy Christopher Steele Tries to Defend Indefensible, Discredited Phony Dossier Used by Dirty Deep State Democrats to Illegally Spy on Trump Campaign

British ex-spy Christopher Steele defended his dossier while leveling criticisms against the president during a rare appearance on Friday .
Steele , a former MI6 agent and the one-time head of the United Kingdom ’ s Russia desk , spoke at a “ members only ” event at Oxford Union in England .
The organizers state , “ Steele was made the subject of media stalking and investigation by Republican senators , and had to go into hiding with his family.
” The only remarks released from the closed-door discussion were tweeted out by the group ’ s account .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ our work , our sources , and what we did , ” Steele told the audience on Friday , adding , “ Trump himself doesn ’ t like intelligence because its ground truth is inconvenient for him.
” The former spy noted , “ The reality check is that Russia is a hostile state as it is run at the moment .
It is out to destabilize the West , and it is nefarious in the way it goes about its business . ''
Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz concluded in December @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was flawed .
The watchdog criticized the Justice Department and the FBI for 17 “ significant errors and omissions ” related to its targeting of former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page through a warrant and three renewals through the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act .
Steele was hired by opposition research firm Fusion GPS , which was funded by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee through the Perkins Coie law firm .
Perkins Coie was paid more than $ 12 million between 2016 and 2017 for its work .
Fusion GPS was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Coie , and Steele was paid roughly $ 168,000 by Fusion GPS .
Following Horowitz ’ s report , the Justice Department told the FISA court it believed the final two Page FISA warrants were “ not valid.
“ The FBI told the court it planned to “ sequester ” all the information obtained through the Page FISA orders .
The report noted that FBI meetings with Steele ’ s sources “ raised significant questions about the reliability of the Steele election reporting , ” and bureau officials said Steele “ may have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Steele ’ s dossier as “ internet rumor.
” James Boasberg , the presiding judge on the FISA court , said on Wednesday the flawed applications left “ little doubt that the government breached its duty of candor to the Court with respect to those applications.
” Boasberg noted , “ All four Page applications relied on information from reports prepared by Christopher Steele.
” He described four broad unsubstantiated and disputed claims made in Steele ’ s dossier : that the Kremlin fed dirt on former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discussed lifting sanctions against Russia in a secret 2016 Moscow meeting , that Page was the go-between for Russia and Trump ’ s campaign in a “ well-developed conspiracy of cooperation ” overseen by then-campaign manager Paul Manafort , and that Russia released the hacked Democratic National Committee emails to WikiLeaks at Page ’ s suggestion to swing voters to Trump .
Special counsel Robert Mueller ’ s report stated the Russians interfered in 2016 in a `` sweeping and systematic fashion '' but that “ the investigation did not establish that members @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the Russian government.
” Horowitz said the FBI concluded “ much of the material ” in the dossier “ could not be corroborated ” and added that “ certain allegations were inaccurate or inconsistent ” with evidence gathered by the FBI and that the “ limited information that was corroborated ” was often “ publicly available.
” The judge said , “ Steele obtained this information from a primary sub-source , who had , in turn , obtained the information from his/her own source network.
” But the FBI `` did not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ between sections of Steele 's reporting that had been used in the applications and statements Steele 's primary sub-source had made to the FBI about the accuracy of information attributed to ‘ Person 1 ’ who the FBI assessed had been the source of the information.
” The government also did not disclose that Steele himself undercut the reliability of `` Person 1 , '' calling Person 1 a “ boaster ” and an “ egoist ” who “ may engage in some embellishment.
” Boasberg noted that “ information bearing on Steele @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also omitted or mischaracterized ” by the government .
The judge said the government also failed to disclose the FBI had learned Steele had been the direct source of information in a September 2016 Yahoo !
News article that was cited in all four applications .
During a lengthy impeachment acquittal speech in February , Trump criticized Steele .
“ Hillary Clinton and the DNC paid for , millions of dollars , the fake dossier , ” Trump said .
“ And now , Christopher Steele admits that it 's a fake .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ were running against some very , very bad and evil people with fake dossiers , with all of these horrible , dirty cops that took these dossiers and did bad things .
”

British ex-spy Christopher Steele defended his dossier while leveling criticisms against the president during a rare appearance on Friday.
Steele, a former MI6 agent and the one-time head of the United Kingdom’s Russia desk, spoke at a “members only” event at Oxford Union in England. The organizers state, “Steele was made the subject of media stalking and investigation by Republican senators, and had to go into hiding with his family.” The only remarks released from the closed-door discussion were tweeted out by the group’s account.
“I stand by the integrity of our work, our sources, and what we did,” Steele told the audience on Friday, adding, “Trump himself doesn’t like intelligence because its ground truth is inconvenient for him.”
The former spy noted, “The reality check is that Russia is a hostile state as it is run at the moment. It is out to destabilize the West, and it is nefarious in the way it goes about its business."
Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz concluded in December that the FBI’s Trump-Russia investigation was flawed. The watchdog criticized the Justice Department and the FBI for 17 “significant errors and omissions” related to its targeting of former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page through a warrant and three renewals through the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
Steele was hired by opposition research firm Fusion GPS, which was funded by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee through the Perkins Coie law firm. Perkins Coie was paid more than $12 million between 2016 and 2017 for its work. Fusion GPS was paid $50,000 per month from Perkins Coie, and Steele was paid roughly $168,000 by Fusion GPS.
Following Horowitz’s report, the Justice Department told the FISA court it believed the final two Page FISA warrants were “not valid.“ The FBI told the court it planned to “sequester” all the information obtained through the Page FISA orders. The report noted that FBI meetings with Steele’s sources “raised significant questions about the reliability of the Steele election reporting,” and bureau officials said Steele “may have some judgment problems.” The CIA referred to Steele’s dossier as “internet rumor.”
James Boasberg, the presiding judge on the FISA court, said on Wednesday the flawed applications left “little doubt that the government breached its duty of candor to the Court with respect to those applications.”
Boasberg noted, “All four Page applications relied on information from reports prepared by Christopher Steele.” He described four broad unsubstantiated and disputed claims made in Steele’s dossier: that the Kremlin fed dirt on former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to Trump's campaign, that Page discussed lifting sanctions against Russia in a secret 2016 Moscow meeting, that Page was the go-between for Russia and Trump’s campaign in a “well-developed conspiracy of cooperation” overseen by then-campaign manager Paul Manafort, and that Russia released the hacked Democratic National Committee emails to WikiLeaks at Page’s suggestion to swing voters to Trump.
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s report stated the Russians interfered in 2016 in a "sweeping and systematic fashion" but that “the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government.”
Horowitz said the FBI concluded “much of the material” in the dossier “could not be corroborated” and added that “certain allegations were inaccurate or inconsistent” with evidence gathered by the FBI and that the “limited information that was corroborated” was often “publicly available.”
The judge said, “Steele obtained this information from a primary sub-source, who had, in turn, obtained the information from his/her own source network.” But the FBI "did not advise DOJ or the Court of inconsistencies between sections of Steele's reporting that had been used in the applications and statements Steele's primary sub-source had made to the FBI about the accuracy of information attributed to ‘Person 1’ who the FBI assessed had been the source of the information.” The government also did not disclose that Steele himself undercut the reliability of "Person 1," calling Person 1 a “boaster” and an “egoist” who “may engage in some embellishment.”
Boasberg noted that “information bearing on Steele's personal credibility and professional judgment was also omitted or mischaracterized” by the government. The judge said the government also failed to disclose the FBI had learned Steele had been the direct source of information in a September 2016 Yahoo! News article that was cited in all four applications.
During a lengthy impeachment acquittal speech in February, Trump criticized Steele.
“Hillary Clinton and the DNC paid for, millions of dollars, the fake dossier,” Trump said. “And now, Christopher Steele admits that it's a fake."
Trump also said, “We were running against some very, very bad and evil people with fake dossiers, with all of these horrible, dirty cops that took these dossiers and did bad things.”
Steele’s private company, Orbis Business Intelligence, called these claims “false” last month.


thelibertydaily--2020-03-07--Austin Cancels Annual South by Southwest Conference Amid Coronavirus Outbreak: ‘Unprecedented’

The annual technology , film , and music conference South by Southwest has been canceled because of the growing coronavirus outbreak .
The event , which brings millions of dollars and thousands of people into the city of Austin , Texas , will not be held this year .
It was scheduled from March 13 to 22 , but the organizers said Austin canceled the dates , and SXSW would `` faithfully follow the City 's directions . ''
“ We are devastated to share this news with you , ” SXSW said in a statement .
“ ‘ The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our DNA , and this is the first time in 34 years that the March event will not take place .
We are now working through the ramifications of this unprecedented situation.
” “ This situation has evolved rapidly , and we honor and respect the City of Austin ’ s decision .
We are committed to do our part to help protect our staff , attendees , and fellow Austinites , ” the statement added .
The decision comes as cases of COVID-19 infections have risen dramatically across the United States .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ 260 confirmed cases and 14 deaths .
In Texas , there have been five cases , although none have been reported in Austin .
Total infections of the illness , which originated in central China , surpassed 100,000 on Friday , with total deaths nearing 3,500 .

The annual technology, film, and music conference South by Southwest has been canceled because of the growing coronavirus outbreak.
The event, which brings millions of dollars and thousands of people into the city of Austin, Texas, will not be held this year. It was scheduled from March 13 to 22, but the organizers said Austin canceled the dates, and SXSW would "faithfully follow the City's directions."
“We are devastated to share this news with you,” SXSW said in a statement. “‘The show must go on’ is in our DNA, and this is the first time in 34 years that the March event will not take place. We are now working through the ramifications of this unprecedented situation.”
“This situation has evolved rapidly, and we honor and respect the City of Austin’s decision. We are committed to do our part to help protect our staff, attendees, and fellow Austinites,” the statement added.
An Update on SXSW 2020. Please read our full statement here: https://t.co/P56nF8KFmE pic.twitter.com/ouJPKM9GNy — SXSW (@sxsw) March 6, 2020
The decision comes as cases of COVID-19 infections have risen dramatically across the United States. As of Friday, there have been 260 confirmed cases and 14 deaths. In Texas, there have been five cases, although none have been reported in Austin.
Total infections of the illness, which originated in central China, surpassed 100,000 on Friday, with total deaths nearing 3,500.


thelibertydaily--2020-03-07--Support The Liberty Daily and Go Ad-Free With TLD GOLD!

Street Address
Address Line 2
City
State / Province / Region
ZIP / Postal Code


thelibertydaily--2020-03-08--GOP Rep. Elise Stefanik Harassed in a ‘Vicious, Vile, Sick Attack’ While Visiting Grocery Store and

GOP Rep. Elise Stefanik Harassed in a ‘Vicious, Vile, Sick Attack’ While Visiting Grocery Store and Her Democrat Opponent Won’t Condemn the Attacker

Rep. Elise Stefanik ( R-N.Y. ) , whose robust defense of President Donald Trump during the House impeachment inquiry helped make her a household name , was harassed at a grocery store on Saturday .
The congresswoman for New York 's 21st district posted a hateful note that was posted on her car 's windshield , presumably written by a left-winger who recognized her .
`` Rot in hell FASCIST PIG , '' the note read , according to a photo shared by Stefanik on Twitter .
“ My husband and I went grocery shopping this morning before district events @ @ @ @ @ @ @ store , '' Stefanik wrote .
“ This vile anonymous note was left on our car . ''
The incident happened after Republicans have warned Democratic politicians and personalities against encouraging their supporters to target GOP officials in public .
In July 2018 , Rep. Maxine Waters ( D-Calif. ) told her supporters at a rally to confront Trump officials when they were out in public .
`` Let 's make sure we show up wherever we have to show up .
And if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a gasoline station , you get out and you create a crowd .
And you push back on them .
And you tell them they 're not welcome anymore , anywhere .
We 've got to get the children connected to their parents , '' Waters said at the time .
Opponent does not condemn the author As Townhall noted , Stefanik asked her Democratic opponent , Tedra Cobb , to denounce the `` hatred '' directed at her .
`` As an elected official , I understand that respectful & passionate policy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But this note is just sad hatred , '' she wrote .
`` We are praying for the author , '' Stefanik added .
`` This hateful rhetoric should be publicly condemned by my opponent immediately . ''
Cobb responded to Stefanik and while she described the note as `` damaging and wrong , '' she stopped short of condemning the anonymous author .
`` I think it 's time you joined me in pledging not to name call in this campaign .
I 'd love to work with you to set a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cobb said .
The back-and-forth between Stefanik and Cobb continued with the congresswoman replying and noting her Democratic opponent failed to condemn the harassment targeting her .
`` One is a policy difference ( you have voted numerous times to raise taxes ) the other is a vicious , vile , sick attack , '' she said .
`` They are not the same and voters know it . ''
As Townhall 's Beth Baumann explained , the message targeting Stefanik may even point to the congresswoman facing a possible security risk .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ it 's also scary .
Clearly the person who left the note watched Stefanik , noticed what car was hers and waited for her and her husband to go into the store .
That 's a safety and security risk . ''

Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), whose robust defense of President Donald Trump during the House impeachment inquiry helped make her a household name, was harassed at a grocery store on Saturday. The congresswoman for New York's 21st district posted a hateful note that was posted on her car's windshield, presumably written by a left-winger who recognized her.
"Rot in hell FASCIST PIG," the note read, according to a photo shared by Stefanik on Twitter.
“My husband and I went grocery shopping this morning before district events and enjoyed chatting with constituents throughout the store," Stefanik wrote. “This vile anonymous note was left on our car."
The incident happened after Republicans have warned Democratic politicians and personalities against encouraging their supporters to target GOP officials in public. In July 2018, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) told her supporters at a rally to confront Trump officials when they were out in public.
"Let's make sure we show up wherever we have to show up. And if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them. And you tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere. We've got to get the children connected to their parents," Waters said at the time.
Opponent does not condemn the author
As Townhall noted, Stefanik asked her Democratic opponent, Tedra Cobb, to denounce the "hatred" directed at her.
"As an elected official, I understand that respectful & passionate policy disagreements are foundational to our democracy. But this note is just sad hatred," she wrote.
"We are praying for the author," Stefanik added. "This hateful rhetoric should be publicly condemned by my opponent immediately."
Cobb responded to Stefanik and while she described the note as "damaging and wrong," she stopped short of condemning the anonymous author.
"I think it's time you joined me in pledging not to name call in this campaign. I'd love to work with you to set a better example for #NY21,” Cobb said.
A 'vicious, vile, sick attack'
The back-and-forth between Stefanik and Cobb continued with the congresswoman replying and noting her Democratic opponent failed to condemn the harassment targeting her.
"One is a policy difference (you have voted numerous times to raise taxes) the other is a vicious, vile, sick attack," she said. "They are not the same and voters know it."
As Townhall's Beth Baumann explained, the message targeting Stefanik may even point to the congresswoman facing a possible security risk.
"Not only is it rude but it's also scary. Clearly the person who left the note watched Stefanik, noticed what car was hers and waited for her and her husband to go into the store. That's a safety and security risk."


thelibertydaily--2020-03-08--Denial, Delusion, and Elitism: The ‘Elizabeth Warren Lost Because She’s a Woman’ Myth

Actual title from an actual NYTimes article : “ I Am Burning With Fury and Grief Over Elizabeth Warren .
And I Am Not Alone.
” On Super Tuesday , Sen. Elizabeth Warren ( D-MA ) came in third in her home state of Massachusetts and fourth in Oklahoma , the state in which she grew up .
The humiliating damage to her 2020 presidential aspirations couldn ’ t be ignored , and she dropped out two days later .
As Mike noted , the media appears to have been hardest hit ( after Warren herself ) .
They were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ twisted themselves into disconcerting displays of cognitive dissonance to excuse , downplay , and/or completely ignore her extensive list of negatives .
None of which , by the way , had anything to do with her being a woman .
Despite going all-in for Warren , the media couldn ’ t influence actual Democrat primary voters .
The media ’ s lack of power , its inability to sway even their own “ side , ” must be a bitter pill to swallow .
As she plummeted in polls and fundraising , Warren @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ever more outrageous pandering and utterly insane pledges .
We covered many of them here at LI .
• Sinking Warren : Green New Deal Not Enough , We Also Need a ‘ Blue New Deal ’ • Elizabeth Warren : My Education Secretary Must Be Approved By A Transgender Child • Lack of Self-Awareness Award Winner : Elizabeth Warren Wants to Criminalize Spreading Misinformation Online • Elizabeth Warren Pledges to Fill Half Her Cabinet With “ Women and Nonbinary People ” • Elizabeth Warren Says She Will Cancel Student Debt for Millions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bernie supporters go ballistic on Elizabeth Warren over last-minute sexism claim • Elizabeth Warren goes full cringeworthy with dance moves and dating advice • Elizabeth Warren Promises IRS Will Have “ Super Duper Enforcement ” Powers If She Wins She also had several campaign controversies arise that certainly didn ’ t help her win over hesitant Democrat primary voters .
• Elizabeth Warren Transferred Oil-and-Gas Investments to Her Children To Protect Her ‘ Green ’ Political Profile Despite all evidence to the contrary , the left is wailing that Warren was rejected by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ !
Indeed , we are being treated to the most appalling avalanche of self-obsessed lefties bemoaning the fact that Warren didn ’ t cut it with Democrat primary voters .
We ’ re informed from the self-satisfied perches of the leftist elite that she is perfect and would make the perfect president if only America weren ’ t such a seething pit of anti-woman hate .
The New York Times published a hilarious piece entitled , “ I Am Burning With Fury and Grief Over Elizabeth Warren .
And I Am Not Alone.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ dawn of woman , when a female aspired but to no avail .
She asked to attend school but was denied .
She raised her hand but wasn ’ t called on .
She applied but wasn ’ t hired .
She enlisted but wasn ’ t deployed .
She created but wasn ’ t credited .
She ran but wasn ’ t elected .
Imagine the sadness and frustration of every such instance as a spark , their combined energy the size of many suns .
That is the measure of grief @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as I watched Elizabeth Warren ’ s bid for the Democratic nomination wane .
When Hillary Clinton lost in 2016 , it hurt in similar ways but didn ’ t surprise me .
Out here in the red hinterlands , it was plain to some of us that centrist ideas did not excite in times of historic inequality .
This election , though , I thought Senator Elizabeth Warren — a class revolutionary to match the moment — might go to the White House .
The overwrought tone of this piece is ludicrous @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the “ Dear Diary ” ravings of an adolescent , and I half expected to find an angst-ridden sophomoric poem amid the hyperbolic drivel .
Over at the Guardian , we learn that the entire Democrat party is now in jeopardy because Warren didn ’ t win the nomination .
Or something .
The internal factionalism and wild hatred within the Democratic party makes either candidate , be it Biden or Sanders , much more likely to lose in November .
And the advanced ages of both of the two remaining major candidates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wins the presidency in November , it remains a real question whether they can feasibly run for a second term .
And so , win or lose , the long , contentious and often hateful Democratic primary cycle will be repeated in four years for the 2024 cycle , further fracturing and handicapping the party , no matter what .
All of this could have been avoided if the media and the electorate were less blinded by cynicism , sexism and fear and more willing to see Warren for who she was – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ candidate in the race .
As a woman , the Massachusetts senator always faced an uphill battle of double standards and misogynist resentment .
It takes a special kind of stupid to come up with , much less submit for publication , this bizarre and hugely inaccurate analysis .
The fresh debate over the role sexism played in Warren ’ s exit raged on social media , just as it did when Harris left the race in December , when New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand got out last summer and when Minnesota Sen. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This is so heartbreaking , and it feels so damn personal , ” writer Jill Filipovic , the author of “ The H-Spot : The Feminist Pursuit of Happiness ” said on Twitter .
“ How many times , in how many contexts , have we seen a smart , competent , dynamic woman who is so head & shoulders above everyone else in the room get ignored or pushed out ?
How many times have we wondered – was I that woman ?
” .
.
.
.
No matter how many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ candidacy or his inability to excite crowds in Iowa and New Hampshire , some voters reasoned that he ’ d still be a tougher candidate against Trump because of his maleness .
“ His maleness ” is why Democrat primary voters preferred Biden to Warren ?
Seriously ?
And then there ’ s this : It ’ s a “ woman ’ s turn ” to become the most powerful person in the free world ?
That ’ s how they want us to vote , based on identity politics and which pet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t had a “ turn.
” At the Nation , they are living in some weird parallel America where women are ( metaphorically ? )
chained to the stove , barefoot , pregnant , and wondering why they can ’ t vote or own property .
The following is from their article entitled , “ Sexism Sank Elizabeth Warren , ” and running with the following subhead : “ Warren was a brilliant candidate who would have made a great president .
The problem ?
She ’ s a woman—and she isn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ live in a deeply sexist culture , and that misogyny is broadcast and reinforced through every cultural vector available .
It is internalized , by men and women , and it takes intentional reflection and deprogramming to even start to break free from its grip .
And yet , despite the best efforts of many thinkers and activists to get America to start treating half of its population as equal members of the country , our best shot at electing a woman president probably involves the Republicans ’ finding a woman who is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ men feel strong .
.
.
.
.
But what makes the Warren experience all the more frustrating is that she is the candidate Democrats asked for back in 2016 .
This is the candidate Democrats said they wanted when they were busy calling Hillary Clinton “ inauthentic ” and “ uninspiring ” and “ pandering.
” She was the candidate progressives used to explain that , while Clinton was a “ corrupt , neoliberal shill , ” they were totally not sexist and would vote for some other woman .
Over at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to “ reckon with the role sexism played in the 2020 Democratic primary.
” Many women are left feeling defeated after Elizabeth Warren ’ s exit from the presidential race .
With a crushing loss on Super Tuesday , and voter after voter quoted in the media saying they ’ d vote for a woman , just not Warren , it made some wonder if a woman would be president in their lifetimes .
Warren spoke about the bind women candidates face while talking with reporters Thursday afternoon .
“ Gender in this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the trap question for every woman , ” Warren said , standing outside her home in Cambridge , Massachusetts , after announcing she would be suspending her campaign Thursday .
“ If you say , ‘ Yeah , there was sexism in this race , ’ everyone says , ‘ Whiner.
’ And if you say , ‘ There was no sexism , ’ about a bazillion women think , ‘ What planet do you live on ?
’ ” For the second time in four years , an exceptionally qualified female candidate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ objectively far less qualified .
Warren ’ s loss was not as sudden or shocking as Hillary Clinton ’ s in 2016 .
But what stung for many was the depth of voters ’ rejection , so much so that Warren came in third in her home state of Massachusetts on Super Tuesday .
It sounds like someone needs “ cuddle services.
” ASAP .
One of the most bizarre and truly sad instances of the denial implicit in all of these assertions that sexism and misogyny doomed Warren ’ s campaign happened @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sad , shameful thing .
It ’ s actually very simple , and President Trump summed it up very well .
Warren is untalented , mean-spirited , and people just don ’ t like her .
Watch ( you won ’ t be sorry .
It ’ s a mic drop moment if ever there was one ) : For her part , Warren seemed to indicate that she will run again in 2024 : A lot can and will happen between now and then , but one thing seems certain , she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and assorted elites who will never bother to wonder what actually happened to Warren ’ s 2020 campaign .
They are content to paint America as sexist ( and all the other ists , phobics , etc. )
.
As they have shown since 2016 , they are not the least bit curious about how people outside their bubble actually think and feel .
.
.
or why the media is no longer the least bit influential .
Instead , they look out now and then and proclaim us all beneath contempt .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , they feel justified in their assessment .
If we weren ’ t racists/sexists/whateverists-phobes , goes their sloppy and shallow thought process , we ’ d do what they want .
Ultimately , all those isms are a self-fulfilling , self-validating prophecy that doesn ’ t require its purveyors to do any actual thinking or work and will forever leave them befuddled , angry , and bitter .
Burning , in other words , with the fury and grief of their own shallow thinking , self-imposed isolation , unearned elitism , and blinkered @ @

On Super Tuesday, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) came in third in her home state of Massachusetts and fourth in Oklahoma, the state in which she grew up. The humiliating damage to her 2020 presidential aspirations couldn’t be ignored, and she dropped out two days later.
As Mike noted, the media appears to have been hardest hit (after Warren herself). They were behind her all the way and often twisted themselves into disconcerting displays of cognitive dissonance to excuse, downplay, and/or completely ignore her extensive list of negatives. None of which, by the way, had anything to do with her being a woman.
Despite going all-in for Warren, the media couldn’t influence actual Democrat primary voters. The media’s lack of power, its inability to sway even their own “side,” must be a bitter pill to swallow.
As she plummeted in polls and fundraising, Warren’s rank desperation evidenced itself in ever more outrageous pandering and utterly insane pledges. We covered many of them here at LI.
She also had several campaign controversies arise that certainly didn’t help her win over hesitant Democrat primary voters.
Despite all evidence to the contrary, the left is wailing that Warren was rejected by Democrat primary voters because sexism! misogyny!
Indeed, we are being treated to the most appalling avalanche of self-obsessed lefties bemoaning the fact that Warren didn’t cut it with Democrat primary voters. We’re informed from the self-satisfied perches of the leftist elite that she is perfect and would make the perfect president if only America weren’t such a seething pit of anti-woman hate.
Elizabeth Warren was the perfect test case: as smart or smarter than Hillary, just as prepared, just as qualified.
AND she didn't have her baggage,
AND she was a known progressive hero,
AND she turned out to be a fantastic campaigner. And still. and still. and still. — jess mcintosh (@jess_mc) March 5, 2020
The New York Times published a hilarious piece entitled, “I Am Burning With Fury and Grief Over Elizabeth Warren. And I Am Not Alone.”
Consider every moment, since the dawn of woman, when a female aspired but to no avail. She asked to attend school but was denied. She raised her hand but wasn’t called on. She applied but wasn’t hired. She enlisted but wasn’t deployed. She created but wasn’t credited. She ran but wasn’t elected. Imagine the sadness and frustration of every such instance as a spark, their combined energy the size of many suns. That is the measure of grief and fury I felt rise inside me as I watched Elizabeth Warren’s bid for the Democratic nomination wane. When Hillary Clinton lost in 2016, it hurt in similar ways but didn’t surprise me. Out here in the red hinterlands, it was plain to some of us that centrist ideas did not excite in times of historic inequality. This election, though, I thought Senator Elizabeth Warren — a class revolutionary to match the moment — might go to the White House.
The overwrought tone of this piece is ludicrous. Beyond ludicrous. It’s the “Dear Diary” ravings of an adolescent, and I half expected to find an angst-ridden sophomoric poem amid the hyperbolic drivel.
Over at the Guardian, we learn that the entire Democrat party is now in jeopardy because Warren didn’t win the nomination. Or something.
The internal factionalism and wild hatred within the Democratic party makes either candidate, be it Biden or Sanders, much more likely to lose in November. And the advanced ages of both of the two remaining major candidates means that even if one of them wins the presidency in November, it remains a real question whether they can feasibly run for a second term. And so, win or lose, the long, contentious and often hateful Democratic primary cycle will be repeated in four years for the 2024 cycle, further fracturing and handicapping the party, no matter what. All of this could have been avoided if the media and the electorate were less blinded by cynicism, sexism and fear and more willing to see Warren for who she was – the most capable, competent and kindest candidate in the race. As a woman, the Massachusetts senator always faced an uphill battle of double standards and misogynist resentment.
It takes a special kind of stupid to come up with, much less submit for publication, this bizarre and hugely inaccurate analysis.
CNN has to CNN:
The fresh debate over the role sexism played in Warren’s exit raged on social media, just as it did when Harris left the race in December, when New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand got out last summer and when Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar departed on Monday. “This is so heartbreaking, and it feels so damn personal,” writer Jill Filipovic, the author of “The H-Spot: The Feminist Pursuit of Happiness” said on Twitter. “How many times, in how many contexts, have we seen a smart, competent, dynamic woman who is so head & shoulders above everyone else in the room get ignored or pushed out? How many times have we wondered – was I that woman?” . . . . No matter how many times Biden showed the weakness of his candidacy or his inability to excite crowds in Iowa and New Hampshire, some voters reasoned that he’d still be a tougher candidate against Trump because of his maleness.
“His maleness” is why Democrat primary voters preferred Biden to Warren? Seriously?
And then there’s this:
https://twitter.com/nhannahjones/status/1235397310047109120
It’s a “woman’s turn” to become the most powerful person in the free world? That’s how they want us to vote, based on identity politics and which pet demographic or “intersection” hasn’t had a “turn.”
At the Nation, they are living in some weird parallel America where women are (metaphorically?) chained to the stove, barefoot, pregnant, and wondering why they can’t vote or own property.
The following is from their article entitled, “Sexism Sank Elizabeth Warren,” and running with the following subhead: “Warren was a brilliant candidate who would have made a great president. The problem? She’s a woman—and she isn’t ‘perfect’.”
We live in a deeply sexist culture, and that misogyny is broadcast and reinforced through every cultural vector available. It is internalized, by men and women, and it takes intentional reflection and deprogramming to even start to break free from its grip. And yet, despite the best efforts of many thinkers and activists to get America to start treating half of its population as equal members of the country, our best shot at electing a woman president probably involves the Republicans’ finding a woman who is willing to kidnap other women to make men feel strong. . . . . But what makes the Warren experience all the more frustrating is that she is the candidate Democrats asked for back in 2016. This is the candidate Democrats said they wanted when they were busy calling Hillary Clinton “inauthentic” and “uninspiring” and “pandering.” She was the candidate progressives used to explain that, while Clinton was a “corrupt, neoliberal shill,” they were totally not sexist and would vote for some other woman.
Over at Vox, we are told we need to “reckon with the role sexism played in the 2020 Democratic primary.”
Many women are left feeling defeated after Elizabeth Warren’s exit from the presidential race. With a crushing loss on Super Tuesday, and voter after voter quoted in the media saying they’d vote for a woman, just not Warren, it made some wonder if a woman would be president in their lifetimes. Warren spoke about the bind women candidates face while talking with reporters Thursday afternoon. “Gender in this race — you know, that is the trap question for every woman,” Warren said, standing outside her home in Cambridge, Massachusetts, after announcing she would be suspending her campaign Thursday. “If you say, ‘Yeah, there was sexism in this race,’ everyone says, ‘Whiner.’ And if you say, ‘There was no sexism,’ about a bazillion women think, ‘What planet do you live on?’” For the second time in four years, an exceptionally qualified female candidate lost to her male counterparts — some objectively far less qualified. Warren’s loss was not as sudden or shocking as Hillary Clinton’s in 2016. But what stung for many was the depth of voters’ rejection, so much so that Warren came in third in her home state of Massachusetts on Super Tuesday.
It sounds like someone needs “cuddle services.” ASAP.
One of the most bizarre and truly sad instances of the denial implicit in all of these assertions that sexism and misogyny doomed Warren’s campaign happened on Twitter.
I shared the news of @ewarren's exit with my 12 year old daughter tonight. Her response wasn’t of sadness or anger. It was much worse than that. A thread. 1/x — Sherry Pagoto (@DrSherryPagoto) March 6, 2020
“She wasn't gonna win either way,” she texted back flatly, as if I was a fool to think otherwise. DEJECTED. The worst response of all. Let me take a step back though because she wasn’t always this way. Let’s go back to 2016. 2/x pic.twitter.com/39RBSG1Gzs — Sherry Pagoto (@DrSherryPagoto) March 6, 2020
Four years later I tried to engage her in Warren’s campaign. It's been harder to capture her interest. Her hesitance to latch onto my excitement has felt like I was trying to talk her into a wild goose chase. She wasn’t having it. 9/x — Sherry Pagoto (@DrSherryPagoto) March 6, 2020
Early on somehow she got the message that Warren had "no chance of winning." She heard loud and clear that in dangerous times the women should step aside to be SAFE. Let a man take the lead. 10/x — Sherry Pagoto (@DrSherryPagoto) March 6, 2020
Twitchy has the whole sad, shameful thing.
It’s actually very simple, and President Trump summed it up very well. Warren is untalented, mean-spirited, and people just don’t like her.
Watch (you won’t be sorry. It’s a mic drop moment if ever there was one):
REPORTER: "Do you think sexism was a factor in Elizabeth Warren pulling out?" TRUMP: "I think lack of talent was her problem… People don't like her. She's a very mean person… They like a person like me that's not mean." pic.twitter.com/CZ1hdboJRx — Caleb Hull (@CalebJHull) March 6, 2020
For her part, Warren seemed to indicate that she will run again in 2024:
“One of the hardest parts of this is all those pinky promises and all those little girls who are gonna have to wait four more years,” Warren said, her voice cracking, referring to promises she often makes with young girls on the campaign trail about women running for president. “That’s gonna be hard. … I take those pinky promises seriously.” [emphasis mine]
A lot can and will happen between now and then, but one thing seems certain, she will remain a darling of the media and assorted elites who will never bother to wonder what actually happened to Warren’s 2020 campaign. They are content to paint America as sexist (and all the other ists, phobics, etc.).
As they have shown since 2016, they are not the least bit curious about how people outside their bubble actually think and feel . . . or why the media is no longer the least bit influential. Instead, they look out now and then and proclaim us all beneath contempt. And then, when they predictably lose, they feel justified in their assessment. If we weren’t racists/sexists/whateverists-phobes, goes their sloppy and shallow thought process, we’d do what they want.
Ultimately, all those isms are a self-fulfilling, self-validating prophecy that doesn’t require its purveyors to do any actual thinking or work and will forever leave them befuddled, angry, and bitter. Burning, in other words, with the fury and grief of their own shallow thinking, self-imposed isolation, unearned elitism, and blinkered ignorance.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


thelibertydaily--2020-03-08--Shocker: Democrat Paramilitary Terrorist Group Antifa has a Pedophile Problem

A Pacific Northwest-based antifa activist , Jamal Oscar Williams , with a history of violence and threatening behavior has been released for treatment rather than incarcerated after committing anti-Semitic attacks against a rabbi and a congregant , which classify as felony hate crimes in Seattle .
The Post Millennial was the only media outlet to cover the Williams anti-Semitic attacks in November .
According to court documents , Williams “ maliciously and intentionally ” followed , threatened to kill and assaulted the Jewish men in multiple attacks in October because of their perceived religion .
According to court documents , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ felony convictions , has been ordered by King County Judge Karen Donohue to participate in the King County Community Center for Alternative Programs ( CCAP ) .
According to their website “ CCAP , formerly Day Reporting , holds offenders accountable to a weekly itinerary directed at involving the offender in a continuum of structured programs .
The goal of CCAP is to assist offenders in changing those behaviors that have contributed to their being charged with a crime .
CCAP provides on-site services as well as referrals to community-based services .
Random @ @ @ @ @ @ @ illegal drug use and consumption of alcohol .
Offenders participating in CCAP receive an individual needs assessment and are scheduled for a variety of programs.
” Williams had previously been enrolled in Sound Mental Health Services , which offers integrated substance abuse and dual diagnosis treatment , with clients receiving individualized recovery programs .
He was unenrolled from services previously because he was in custody .
As part of the court order , rather than being incarcerated , Williams is required to return to his apartment through Plymouth Housing .
According to their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ First philosophy , operating on the principle that people can not improve their lives until they have a safe , stable place to live .
The order goes on to state that Williams is a graduate of the Fare Start program and plans to re-engage with Fare Start for employment support and to attend their job fairs .
Fare Start “ …transforms lives , disrupts poverty and nourishes communities through food , life skills and job training.
” As reported by Andy Ngo , “ Rabbi Shmuel Levitin and Ephraim Block were operating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jewish holiday in downtown Seattle on October 11 when Williams allegedly approached them and shouted : ‘ Jews , Jews , Jews … give me your money !
’ He then said he had a gun and was going to kill them .
Both Levitin and Block have beards and payots , or sideburns , and were wearing yarmulkes .
Levitin is a rabbi at the Chabad of Downtown Seattle .
“ Three days later , Williams returned and made similar threats and demands for money .
On October 15 , Williams followed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ apartment building .
After making more demands for money , he allegedly hurled candy from the concierge ’ s desk at the men .
Police later found and arrested Williams in a nearby area .
“ In August 2018 , Williams was arrested in Seattle during a counter-protest against right-wing group Patriot Prayer .
Last November , he threatened this journalist with death outside Seattle City Hall at a counter-demonstration against a conservative group .
On August 17 Williams was in Portland , Oregon , where he was recorded accosting people aggressively during @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
He was also part of a group of people who surrounded and threatened to hurt Julio Rosas , a reporter with the Washington Examiner .
Williams was later arrested by Portland Police for disorderly conduct .
He did not show up to his court hearing in September and there is a bench warrant for his arrest .
“ In addition to Williams ’ s radical political activism with antifa , he has a long history of criminal and harassing behavior .
In Washington State , he was convicted in 2015 for felony @ @ @ @ @ @ @ multiple other convictions for assault and domestic violence .
He also has a long violent criminal record in Alaska , where he used to live.
” In September , Williams was seen embracing Vice Chair of Seattle ’ s 37th district Democrats and leader of the King County Young Democrats and antifa activist Chase Cross while energizing his masked antifa protestors approaching a police line .
Williams has been given every opportunity available through Seattle and King County services to get his life on track .
Yet he has chosen to re-offend time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ child for a failed justice system in Seattle .
King County prosecutor Dan Satterberg came under fire for the “ revolving door justice system ” in that county .
In Seattle , the largest city in King County , prolific offenders with dozens of convictions are often arrested only to be quickly returned to the streets .
King County and neighboring Snohomish County became the first in the nation to stop charging people for possessing small amounts of drugs — heroin , meth and crack included — in virtually all cases in 2018 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” to the Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion ( LEAD ) program .
LEAD claims to divert people who don ’ t belong in jail , to other programs to transition them back into society .
This program has won multiple awards and been cited in expansion programs across the country such as New York ’ s controversial bail reform program .
The New York program allowed multiple offenders in a rash of anti-Semitic attacks in December to go free .
Yet the LEAD program is one of the contributing factors of prolific offenders @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has not produced any data since 2014 to illustrate the program ’ s success .
Programs across the country also rely on the same irrelevant data set .
Lisa Dugaard , the director of the LEAD program , continues to trot out the same statistics from 6 years ago as justification for continued funding of the program .
However , according to their own reports , the LEAD Program does not track participants .
When asked about this , Dugaard claimed that they are legally barred from releasing any data about participants .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ questionable program , Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan proposed cutting the majority of the LEAD funding in 2019 as part of her 2020 budget , pending an investigation into the effectiveness of the program .
When a system is established which views all criminals equally as potential victims of the system itself , someone who has committed multiple hate crimes is bound to be treated the same as a teenager who is a first-time drug offender .
This dangerous system is responsible for the release of hundreds of prolific offenders like Williams , compromising @ @ @

On March 4, a conservative student group in Ireland revealed they had completed a year-long project operating undercover as an antifa cell.
Antifascist Students Ireland revealed themselves to be a project of Irish conservative student news outlet The Burkean on their Twitter page,
The Burkean’s actions directed significant attention towards Ireland’s official Antifa organization, Antifascist Ireland, a group that has come under fire in the past for the history of its alleged founding member and leading figurehead, Pat Corcoran—a convicted pedophile.
Corcoran is a former civil servant who worked with the Irish Department of Arts, Heritage, and Gaeltacht. In 2009, he was found to be in possession of over 7,000 images and 21 videos featuring child sexual abuse and torture. He was handed the lenient sentence of 3.5 years suspended—meaning he never served a day in prison. The decision caused outrage amongst Irish commentary writers, one of whom used Corcoran’s case as an example of Ireland being a “pedophile’s paradise.”
Corcoran was fired from his government position, but around the same time of his sentencing, Corcoran joined left-wing grassroots publisher Indymedia where he worked undetected until 2013. Once the publisher discovered his disgusting history, he was immediately resigned. Indymedia issued a statement condemning Corcoran, and insisting they had no knowledge of his abusive past.
But Corcoran was not disinvited from all of his activist groups. Independent media and citizen reports out of Ireland allege that Corcoran has been seen engaging in public activism with left-wing groups as recently as November 2019.
But Ireland is not the only country whose main organized antifa group has had trouble with pedophilia in its ranks.
In February of 2020, seven Russian antifa members were sentenced to 6-18 years in prison for planning bombings intended to disrupt the 2018 Russian presidential elections.
Of the seven, one of the principal figures, Arman Sagynbaev, was revealed to have a disturbing history with women and girls.
Seven women came forward to recount details of their experiences with Sagynbaev, some of which have been translated to English. The women, some of whom were as young as 14 when they had their experiences with the antifa leader, were all horrifically sexually assaulted. They were used as domestic slaves, forced to shoplift, routinely beaten and threatened into performing degrading sexual acts, and one was even infected with Sagynbaev’s HIV.
Some of the abuses were so unconscionable, “leaving no room for doubt,” that Anarchist Black Cross—a network of activists supporting political prisoners—withdrew all assistance from Sagynbaev during his legal battle with the Russian state. They also removed him from their list of political prisoners.
Even the United States has had its own case comparable to those in Ireland and Russia.
In Portland, the epicentre of antifa activism, a leading activist has faced multiple arrests for the sexual abuse of minors.
Micah Isaiah Rhodes of Portland’s Resistance was arrested in 2014 and in 2015 for sexually abusing a minor girl and minor boy. During his trials, the county Sheriff revealed that Rhodes had an inappropriate history with minors dating to his youth. At 14, Rhodes was caught sexually abusing a 9 year old boy, and at 15, Rhodes was caught with three much younger boys.
Despite his history, Rhodes was spared all prison time as the judge claimed Rhodes was “trying to change.”


thelibertydaily--2020-03-08--University Profiled Conservative Student for Years to Later Paint Him as Terrorist for Posting Rifle

Big League Politics has reported extensively on the case of Lucas Gerhard , the former Lake Superior State University ( LSSU ) student who was expelled from school and charged with making terrorist threats for posting a picture of a rifle on social media .
One crucial aspect of the case is the repressive campus atmosphere that resulted in Gerhard being profiled as a potential threat .
This set the stage for his Snapchat post of the so-called “ assault rifle ” allowed them to use law enforcement to strike back against a conservative rabble-rouser who campus officials wanted out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ documents showing the institutional conspiracy that was waged against Gerhard , an proud conservative who was not shy about sharing his beliefs on campus , and how a file maintained by LSSU staff based largely on anonymous snitching was used to paint him as a terrorist threat in the courts .
Trending : Dan Crenshaw Calls for Immediate Republican Action at the Federal Level to Stop Climate Change The probable cause affidavit from the 91st District Court noted Gerhard ’ s “ extreme political views ” as being part of the reason his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nothing illegal was found in the search , eventually leading to his arrest .
His “ extreme political views ” were also listed in the search warrant as an excuse to seize information from his private Snapchat account in an attempt to enter his political posts as evidence during the trial .
take our poll - story continues below In addition , a profile emerged of Gerhard being harassed on campus due to his conservative political opinions , which was later exploited to push for his charges .
One such documented incident came @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for a “ wellness check ” because he posted a politically-incorrect opinion related to female law enforcement in an online discussion forum related to a class .
The resident adviser found that the check was unfounded , but the record was logged and eventually used as part of a profile to show Gerhard as a potential threat .
Another complaint was filed against Gerhard because he was dressed in a Sheriffs outfit with a duffel bag and a riot shield for a speech he was planning to give to a communication class .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ complaint , he allowed police to search his duffel bag , which contained no weapons , and presented his note cards to police for the speech .
After his story checked out , law enforcement let him go and noted that the complaint filed against Gerhard was unfounded .
Additional informing occurred against Gerhard because of language in his Instagram profile .
This prompted an anonymous individual , noting that they were driven into hysteria because of media coverage following a mass shooting , to make a report to the Oakland County Sheriff @ @ @ @ @ @ @ woman who made the complaint against Gerhard ’ s rifle post also noted during court testimony that news reporting contributed to her fear as well .
“ This young man is a seriously potential threat .
I have wanted to let you know about this boy for a long time .
After yesterday , I had no choice but to contact you , ” the snitch wrote .
“ Lucas Gerhard has been posting some very concerning social media posts and I am not comfortable with them .
Things like this and past @ @ @ @ @ @ @ concerned for having to be on the same campus , ” another snitch wrote .
Gerhard ’ s car was also reported as being vandalized on campus , with a rear window being broken on his 2008 Crown Victoria in Sept. 2018 , which may have been retaliation from far-left extremists for being an outspoken conservative .
It is noted in the LSSU case report that Gerhard ’ s Snapchat post of the rifle was found to be suspicious based off of “ previous interactions Gerhard has had with the school , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the unsubstantiated testimony of anonymous snitches .
The case report also referenced “ previous incidents and threats made by Gerhard , ” although none of them were listed specifically since they were dismissed after the concerns of snitches who targeted Gerhard based on his conservative beliefs were considered baseless by authorities .
In today ’ s snitch culture where citizen spies are encouraged to act as Soviet-style apparatchiks against their fellow countrymen by the Democrat Party , fake news media , and deep state in order to enforce Big Brother , political speech @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and Gerhard has learned that the hard way .
His case is still ongoing , and Big League Politics will continue to provide updates as it develops .

University Profiled Conservative Student for Years to Later Paint Him as Terrorist for Posting Rifle Picture on Social Media
Big League Politics has reported extensively on the case of Lucas Gerhard, the former student at Lake Superior State University (LSSU) in Sault St. Marie, Mich. who was charged with making terrorist threats for posting a picture of a rifle on social media.
One crucial aspect of the case is the repressive campus atmosphere that resulted in Gerhard being profiled as a potential threat. This set the stage for his Snapchat post of the so-called “assault rifle” allowed them to use law enforcement to strike back against a conservative rabble-rouser who campus officials wanted out of their hair.
We have obtained documents showing the institutional conspiracy that was waged against Gerhard, an proud conservative who was not shy about sharing his beliefs on campus, and how a file maintained by LSSU staff based largely on anonymous snitching was used to paint him as a terrorist threat in the courts.
The probable cause affidavit from the 91st District Court noted Gerhard’s “extreme political views” as being part of the reason his dorm room was searched, and although nothing illegal was found in the search, eventually leading to his arrest. His “extreme political views” were also listed in the search warrant as an excuse to seize information from his private Snapchat account in an attempt to enter his political posts as evidence during the trial.
In addition, a profile emerged of Gerhard being harassed on campus due to his conservative political opinions, which was later exploited to push for his charges. One such documented incident came after a student reported Gerhard to authorities for a “wellness check” because he posted a politically-incorrect opinion related to female law enforcement in an online discussion forum related to a class. The resident adviser found that the check was unfounded, but the record was logged and eventually used as part of a profile to show Gerhard as a potential threat.
Another complaint was filed against Gerhard because he was dressed in a Sheriffs office cadet uniform with a duffel bag and a riot shield for a speech he was planning to give to a communication class. When law enforcement approached Gerhard regarding the complaint, he allowed police to search his duffel bag, which contained no weapons, and presented his note cards to police for the speech. After his story checked out, law enforcement let him go and noted that the complaint filed against Gerhard was unfounded.
Additional informing occurred against Gerhard because of language in his Instagram profile. This prompted an anonymous individual, noting that they were driven into hysteria because of media coverage following a mass shooting, to make a report to the Oakland County Sheriff’s Department about Gerhard. The woman who made the complaint against Gerhard’s rifle post also noted during court testimony that news reporting contributed to her fear as well.
“This young man is a seriously potential threat. I have wanted to let you know about this boy for a long time. After yesterday, I had no choice but to contact you,” the snitch wrote.
“Lucas Gerhard has been posting some very concerning social media posts and I am not comfortable with them. Things like this and past issues I know about legitimately make me concerned for having to be on the same campus,” another snitch wrote.
Gerhard’s car was also reported as being vandalized on campus, with a rear window being broken on his 2008 Crown Victoria in Sept. 2018, which may have been retaliation from far-left extremists for being an outspoken conservative.
It is noted in the LSSU case report that Gerhard’s Snapchat post of the rifle was found to be suspicious based off of “previous interactions Gerhard has had with the school,” ie. his profile built largely from the unsubstantiated testimony of anonymous snitches. The case report also referenced “previous incidents and threats made by Gerhard,” although none of them were listed specifically since they were dismissed after the concerns of snitches who targeted Gerhard based on his conservative beliefs were considered baseless by authorities.
In today’s snitch culture where citizen spies are encouraged to act as Soviet-style apparatchiks against their fellow countrymen by the Democrat Party, fake news media, and deep state in order to enforce Big Brother, political speech and genuine self-expression can have severe consequences, and Gerhard has learned that the hard way. His case is still ongoing, and Big League Politics will continue to provide updates as it develops. You can contribute to his GoFundMe here.


thelibertydaily--2020-03-08--Feds Bust Heinous Birth Tourism Ring in Southern California

Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials conducted raids on three residential buildings being used for an elaborate ‘ birth tourism ’ scheme in Southern California last week .
The buildings were being utilized by a birth tourism ring called You Win USA Vacation Resort .
The entity charged pregnant foreign women around $ 50,000 in return for shepherding them through the US visa and immigration process , with the understanding that they would exploit America ’ s birthright citizenship laws to ensure their children would be US citizens .
Community members in the Irvine neighborhood described seeing groups of pregnant Chinese @ @ @ @ @ @ @ where the birth tourism ring was keeping them .
Trending : Dan Crenshaw Calls for Immediate Republican Action at the Federal Level to Stop Climate Change Court documents related to the bust of You Win USA Vacation Resort describe the birth tourism ring as having enabled more than 400 women give birth in the geographic United States in the past two years- at one Orange County Hospital alone .
take our poll - story continues below The ring coached foreign women in how to successful deceive American immigration authorities and hide the fact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in itself is not illegal , but lying to enter the country with the intent of procuring citizenship for unborn children is .
ICE official Claude Arnold told local media that Southern California has become a hotspot for this form of immigration fraud .
“ These people were told to lie , how to lie , so that their motives for coming to the U.S. wouldn ’ t be questioned.
” It appears that no arrests were made or charges were filed following ICE ’ s raid on the birth tourism complex .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ reduces American nationality to nothing more than a joke .
America is one of the few nations in the world to maintain outdated birthright citizenship laws , in a globalized era in which numerous other major countries have abolished it .
President Trump has floated the premise of creating an executive order to essentially abolish birthright citizenship , a project that would likely result in a lengthy legal battle .
He is yet to mount an effort to challenge America ’ s birthright citizenship laws that are easy to rig and abuse .

Feds Bust Heinous Birth Tourism Ring in Southern California
Federal agents enter an upscale apartment complex, Tuesday, March 3, 2015, in Irvine, Calif. Shortly after sunrise, federal agents swarmed the complex in the Orange County where authorities say a birth tourism business charged pregnant women $50,000 for lodging, food and transportation. The key draw for travelers is that the United States offers birthright citizenship. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)
Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials conducted raids on three residential buildings being used for an elaborate ‘birth tourism’ scheme in Southern California last week.
The buildings were being utilized by a birth tourism ring called You Win USA Vacation Resort. The entity charged pregnant foreign women around $50,000 in return for shepherding them through the US visa and immigration process, with the understanding that they would exploit America’s birthright citizenship laws to ensure their children would be US citizens.
Community members in the Irvine neighborhood described seeing groups of pregnant Chinese women arriving and living at the apartments where the birth tourism ring was keeping them.
Court documents related to the bust of You Win USA Vacation Resort describe the birth tourism ring as having enabled more than 400 women give birth in the geographic United States in the past two years- at one Orange County Hospital alone.
The ring coached foreign women in how to successfully deceive American immigration authorities and hide the fact that they are pregnant. Birth tourism in itself is not illegal, but lying to enter the country with the intent of procuring citizenship for unborn children is.
ICE official Claude Arnold told local media that Southern California has become a hotspot for this form of immigration fraud. “These people were told to lie, how to lie, so that their motives for coming to the U.S. wouldn’t be questioned.”
It appears that no arrests were made or charges were filed following ICE’s raid on the birth tourism complex.
Such cynical exploitation of American citizenship law reduces American nationality to nothing more than a joke. America is one of the few nations in the world to maintain outdated birthright citizenship laws, in a globalized era in which numerous other major countries have abolished it.
President Trump has floated the premise of creating an executive order to essentially abolish birthright citizenship, a project that would likely result in a lengthy legal battle. He is yet to mount an effort to challenge America’s birthright citizenship laws that are easy to rig and abuse.


thelibertydaily--2020-03-08--19 States Sue to Derail President Trump’s America First Agenda at the Border

19 states have banded together to file a lawsuit against the Trump administration over its recent allocation of $ 3.8 billion in defense funding for the border wall .
According to Luis Miguel of The New American , the argument these states made was that this action was unconstitutional and could bring about harmful environmental consequences .
“ Use of these additional federal funds for the construction of a border wall is contrary to Congress ’ s intent and in violation of the U.S. Constitution , ” read the lawsuit , filed on March 3 , 2020 in federal court @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Calls for Immediate Republican Action at the Federal Level to Stop Climate Change In 2019 , President Trump declared a national emergency in response to a large wave of migrants coming across the southern border .
take our poll - story continues below In addition to the declaration , the president announced he would use Department of Defense ( DOD ) funds to build the border wall because Congress did not allocate the full amount he wanted in the federal budget .
The Pentagon revealed to Congress last month that it would transfer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wall by drawing out money from weapons programs .
The 19 states sustain that the allocation is unconstitutional because it is in violation of the separation of powers and Congress ’ power of the purse .
In the lawsuit , the plaintiffs argue that using DOD funds negatively impacts communities whose economies depend on military spending .
Further , the states claim that the Trump administration did not factor in environmental impacts .
They described the White House ’ s decision as a violation of the National Environmental Policy Act ( NEPA ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ safety of every American by diverting taxpayer dollars from our military to fund the same xenophobic campaign promises he ’ s made for the last four years , ” said New York Attorney General Letitia James in a statement .
Luis Miguel noted that in addition to New York , “ the states participating in the lawsuit are California , Colorado , Connecticut , Hawaii , Illinois , Maine , Maryland , Massachusetts , Michigan , Minnesota , Nevada , New Jersey , New Mexico , Oregon , Rhode Island , Vermont , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also asserts that the wall will cause environmental damage in some of the states where it will be built .
“ Defendants ’ use of the diverted funds to construct parts of their border wall in New Mexico will also harm New Mexico ’ s sovereign interests by imposing environmental harm to the State .
The environmental damage caused by a border wall in New Mexico would include the blocking of wildlife migration , flooding , and habitat loss , ” the suit states .
Last week , the Sierra Club , American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Communities Coalition also took legal action regarding the reallocation of funds for the wall .
“ The president is doubling down on his unlawful scheme to raid taxpayer funds for a xenophobic campaign promise that is destroying national treasures , harming the environment , and desecrating tribal lands , ” an ACLU attorney declared .
The Left is working overtime to derail President Trump ’ s America First agenda .
Immigration is the most crucial of our time .
From maintaining a cohesive nation state to protecting political traditions such as the right @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so many areas — politics , economics , and culture .
This is one battle America First patriots can not afford to lose

19 States Sue to Derail President Trump’s America First Agenda at the Border
19 states have banded together to file a lawsuit against the Trump administration over its recent allocation of $3.8 billion in defense funding for the border wall.
According to Luis Miguel of The New American, the argument these states made was that this action was unconstitutional and could bring about harmful environmental consequences.
“Use of these additional federal funds for the construction of a border wall is contrary to Congress’s intent and in violation of the U.S. Constitution,” read the lawsuit, filed on March 3, 2020 in federal court in California.
In 2019, President Trump declared a national emergency in response to a large wave of migrants coming across the southern border.
In addition to the declaration, the president announced he would use Department of Defense (DOD) funds to build the border wall because Congress did not allocate the full amount he wanted in the federal budget.
The Pentagon revealed to Congress last month that it would transfer an additional $3.8 billion for the wall by drawing out money from weapons programs.
The 19 states sustain that the allocation is unconstitutional because it is in violation of the separation of powers and Congress’ power of the purse.
In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs argue that using DOD funds negatively impacts communities whose economies depend on military spending.
The lawsuit reads:
Defense spending in Connecticut is critical not just to national military readiness but to Connecticut’s economy. The Administration’s planned funding diversions threaten to harm the State’s economy, employment, and tax revenues. As of 2017, annual defense spending injected $15 billion into Connecticut’s economy, accounting for 5.6 percent of the State’s per capita GDP — a higher percentage than in all but two other states. DOD’s reprogramming action diverts funding away from critical military projects for which Connecticut-based companies produce key components.
Further, the states claim that the Trump administration did not factor in environmental impacts. They described the White House’s decision as a violation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
“President Trump is risking the safety of every American by diverting taxpayer dollars from our military to fund the same xenophobic campaign promises he’s made for the last four years,” said New York Attorney General Letitia James in a statement.
Luis Miguel noted that in addition to New York, “the states participating in the lawsuit are California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and Wisconsin.”
The suit also asserts that the wall will cause environmental damage in some of the states where it will be built.
“Defendants’ use of the diverted funds to construct parts of their border wall in New Mexico will also harm New Mexico’s sovereign interests by imposing environmental harm to the State. The environmental damage caused by a border wall in New Mexico would include the blocking of wildlife migration, flooding, and habitat loss,” the suit states.
Last week, the Sierra Club, American Civil Liberties Union, and Southern Border Communities Coalition also took legal action regarding the reallocation of funds for the wall.
“The president is doubling down on his unlawful scheme to raid taxpayer funds for a xenophobic campaign promise that is destroying national treasures, harming the environment, and desecrating tribal lands,” an ACLU attorney declared.
The Left is working overtime to derail President Trump’s America First agenda.
Immigration is the most crucial of our time.
From maintaining a cohesive nation state to protecting political traditions such as the right to bear arms, immigration bleeds into so many areas — politics, economics, and culture.
This is one battle America First patriots cannot afford to lose


thelibertydaily--2020-03-08--UN Crowd Gasps as Italian Politician Tells Globalists’ Brainwashed Climate Puppet Greta Thunberg to

UN Crowd Gasps as Italian Politician Tells Globalists’ Brainwashed Climate Puppet Greta Thunberg to ‘Go Back to School and Go Back to a Normal Life’

The gasps could be heard throughout the UN when Italian politician Pietro Fiocchi advised climate activist Greta Thunberg .
His @ @ @ @ @ kind , saying her life is “ as precious as the climate ” : “ @ @ @ @ @ I would like to give an advice as a father gives an advice to a @ @ @ @ @ school and go back to a normal life .
Your childhood is as precious as @ @ @ @ @ you don ’ t do something about it , you will lose it forever , @ @ @ @ @ we do not do anything about the climate , we will lose it forever.
” @ @ @ @ @ in the climate change movement and has traveled the world speaking about how climate change @ @ @ @ @ we don ’ t act soon .
The ironic thing is that Thunberg ’ s @ @ @ @ @ bigger carbon footprint than most people .

The gasps could be heard throughout the UN when Italian politician Pietro Fiocchi advised climate activist Greta Thunberg. His advice was somewhat fatherly and kind, saying her life is “as precious as the climate”:
“At the same time, I would like to give an advice as a father gives an advice to a daughter — go back to school and go back to a normal life. Your childhood is as precious as the climate, and if you don’t do something about it, you will lose it forever, [just] as if we do not do anything about the climate, we will lose it forever.”
MEP Pietro Fiocchi to Greta Thunberg: "I would like to give advice as a father gives advice to a daughter — go back to school and go back to a normal life. Your childhood is as precious as the climate and if you don't do something about it, you will lose it forever." pic.twitter.com/zQopvbabdG — The Hill (@thehill) March 4, 2020
Thunberg has been a fixture in the climate change movement and has traveled the world speaking about how climate change will destroy us all if we don’t act soon.
The ironic thing is that Thunberg’s traveling has given her a bigger carbon footprint than most people.


thelibertydaily--2020-03-08--Colorado Democrats Release Illegal Alien Charged With Sexually Assaulting a Child

• Francisco Barraza-Porras , a resident of Boulder County , Colorado , was arrested in January and charged with multiple counts of sexual child assault , but was subsequently released back into the public .
• The Daily Caller News Foundation discovered that Barraza-Porras is an illegal alien , and Immigration and Customs Enforcement ( ICE ) is conducting an active investigation into his case .
• ICE confirmed that Boulder County officials do not work with federal immigration authorities , and the sanctuary county does not honor ICE detainer requests .
A Boulder County , Colorado , man charged @ @ @ @ @ @ @ local law enforcement is living in the U.S. illegally , the Daily Caller News Foundation exclusively confirmed .
The Lafayette Police Department and the Boulder County District Attorney ’ s office are asking the public for help in locating Francisco Barraza-Porras , a 47-year-old man who was released from custody , skipped his court date and is at large .
ICE revealed to the DCNF that Barraza-Porras is an illegal alien , and Boulder County officials confirmed that they do not honor ICE administrative warrants .
The incident showcases the consequences when sanctuary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ illegal alien over to federal immigration authorities .
Barraza-Porras , who was last known to be living in Lafayette , Colorado , was arrested Jan. 2 and charged with multiple counts of sexual assault on a child .
Instead of keeping him in custody or handing him over to ICE , local law enforcement released him back into the public with an order to appear to appear before court on March 2 .
However , Barraza-Porras never showed up to his court date , and law enforcement doesn ’ t know where he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the governor ’ s office , which are under control of the Democratic Party , has dramatically curtailed ICE ’ s ability to enforce immigration laws in recent years .
Law enforcement in the state are prohibited from arresting or detaining a suspected illegal alien solely on the basis of an ICE request .
A law Democratic Gov .
Jared Polis signed in 2019 also bars officers from providing a suspected illegal immigrant ’ s personal information to ICE , and requires state police to read illegal aliens their Miranda rights when coordinating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no exception to this statewide sanctuary platform .
“ Per state law , we only accept detaining someone if there is a warrant signed by a judge .
So we don ’ t accept just general ICE detainers , ” an administrative official with the Boulder County government told the DCNF .
This policy is typical among sanctuary jurisdictions in regard to immigration detainer requests .
If an illegal alien is arrested by local law enforcement for an unrelated crime , ICE will lodge a detainer request with that agency , asking that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ longer than 48 hours in order for an ICE agent to arrive and assume custody .
Sanctuary states and jurisdictions claim that detainer requests are worthless unless signed by a judge .
However , federal immigration authorities push back against this claim , arguing that Congress has given explicit authority to ICE to issue administrative arrest warrants .
The Immigration and Nationality Act , in particular , gives federal immigration authorities the ability to lodge detainer requests .
( RELATED : Denver Sticking To Sanctuary Policy Following Arrest Of Hit-And-Run Suspect Who Was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public has been misled to believe that certain judges have the authority to sign a warrant for civil immigration violations — but no such judicial authority exists , ” ICE spokeswoman Justine Whelan told the DCNF in August 2019 .
“ This idea is a myth created by those who either oppose immigration enforcement efforts , are misinformed , or who do not understand how the immigration system work.
” ICE spokeswoman Alethea Smock confirmed that Boulder County does not cooperate with the agency , and that ICE is conducting an active investigation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ DCNF on Saturday that they believe he is still at large .
The Boulder County District Attorney ’ s office , and the Lafayette Police Department , according to local reports , are urging the public to help them locate him , and have encouraged them to contact an investigator if they have any information about his whereabouts .
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience .
For licensing opportunities of our original content , please contact @ @ @ @

Francisco Barraza-Porras, a resident of Boulder County, Colorado, was arrested in January and charged with multiple counts of sexual child assault, but was subsequently released back into the public.
The Daily Caller News Foundation discovered that Barraza-Porras is an illegal alien, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is conducting an active investigation into his case.
ICE confirmed that Boulder County officials do not work with federal immigration authorities, and the sanctuary county does not honor ICE detainer requests.
A Boulder County, Colorado, man charged with child sexual assault and wanted by local law enforcement is living in the U.S. illegally, the Daily Caller News Foundation exclusively confirmed.
The Lafayette Police Department and the Boulder County District Attorney’s office are asking the public for help in locating Francisco Barraza-Porras, a 47-year-old man who was released from custody, skipped his court date and is at large. ICE revealed to the DCNF that Barraza-Porras is an illegal alien, and Boulder County officials confirmed that they do not honor ICE administrative warrants.
The incident showcases the consequences when sanctuary jurisdictions fail to transfer custody of an illegal alien over to federal immigration authorities.
Barraza-Porras, who was last known to be living in Lafayette, Colorado, was arrested Jan. 2 and charged with multiple counts of sexual assault on a child. Instead of keeping him in custody or handing him over to ICE, local law enforcement released him back into the public with an order to appear to appear before court on March 2.
However, Barraza-Porras never showed up to his court date, and law enforcement doesn’t know where he is.
The Colorado state legislature and the governor’s office, which are under control of the Democratic Party, has dramatically curtailed ICE’s ability to enforce immigration laws in recent years.
Law enforcement in the state are prohibited from arresting or detaining a suspected illegal alien solely on the basis of an ICE request. A law Democratic Gov. Jared Polis signed in 2019 also bars officers from providing a suspected illegal immigrant’s personal information to ICE, and requires state police to read illegal aliens their Miranda rights when coordinating an ICE interview.
Boulder County is no exception to this statewide sanctuary platform.
“Per state law, we only accept detaining someone if there is a warrant signed by a judge. So we don’t accept just general ICE detainers,” an administrative official with the Boulder County government told the DCNF.
This policy is typical among sanctuary jurisdictions in regard to immigration detainer requests.
If an illegal alien is arrested by local law enforcement for an unrelated crime, ICE will lodge a detainer request with that agency, asking that they hold onto that individual for no longer than 48 hours in order for an ICE agent to arrive and assume custody. Sanctuary states and jurisdictions claim that detainer requests are worthless unless signed by a judge.
However, federal immigration authorities push back against this claim, arguing that Congress has given explicit authority to ICE to issue administrative arrest warrants. The Immigration and Nationality Act, in particular, gives federal immigration authorities the ability to lodge detainer requests. (RELATED: Denver Sticking To Sanctuary Policy Following Arrest Of Hit-And-Run Suspect Who Was Already Deported Six Times)
“The public has been misled to believe that certain judges have the authority to sign a warrant for civil immigration violations — but no such judicial authority exists,” ICE spokeswoman Justine Whelan told the DCNF in August 2019. “This idea is a myth created by those who either oppose immigration enforcement efforts, are misinformed, or who do not understand how the immigration system work.”
ICE spokeswoman Alethea Smock confirmed that Boulder County does not cooperate with the agency, and that ICE is conducting an active investigation into Barraza-Porras. Lafayette Police told the DCNF on Saturday that they believe he is still at large.
The Boulder County District Attorney’s office, and the Lafayette Police Department, according to local reports, are urging the public to help them locate him, and have encouraged them to contact an investigator if they have any information about his whereabouts.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.