thelibertydaily--2020-10-08--Why Doesn’t Press Ask Kamala Harris About Covering Up Sex Abuse Of Children?

Since the day she was named Joe Biden ’ s V.P .
Kamala Harris ( D-CA ) , the mainstream media has described Kamala Harris as a “ moderate ” who is so wonderful she practically walks on water .
Sadly the media doesn ’ t vet Democrats , because if they did some vetting of Harris ’ history as a prosecutor they would have discovered her disturbing record as the San Francisco DA–She refused to pursue child molestation criminal cases against Catholic priests investigated by her predecessor And when the victims asked her for help with their civil cases @ @ @ @ @ @ @ covered up the evidence .
Coincidently ( if you believe in coincidences ) Kamala Harris received substantial campaign donations from people and organizations associated with the accused molesters and their defense .
In his book , Profiles in Corruption : Abuse of Power by America ’ s Progressive Elite , Peter Schweizer unveils how Harris refused to pursue the case .
And also exposes the fact that many of the law firms and lawyers who were representing the archdiocese on a variety of legal matters — including priests that had been identified as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Harris ’ s political campaign .
Some of them had never given contributions to a race like this before , but they came up with the cash for Kamala Harris .
During her decade-and-a-half tenure as a chief prosecutor , Harris would fail to prosecute a single case of priest abuse and her office would strangely hide vital records on abuses that had occurred , despite the protests of victims ’ groups .
Harris ’ s predecessor as San Francisco district attorney , Terence Hallinan , was aware of and had prosecuted numerous @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
And he had been gathering case files for even more… Hallinan ’ s office had launched an investigation and quickly discovered that the San Francisco Archdiocese had extensive internal records concerning complaints going back some seventy-five years .
In spring of 2002 , Hallinan demanded the church turn them over to his office .
take our poll - story continues below Eventually , the archdiocese turned over the documents , and they were horrific .
Supposedly the papers revealed the names of forty current and ex-priests who were accused of sexual abuse @ @ @ @ @ @ @ began the process of bringing them to justice , However , many of the cases were past what had been the statute of limitations .
And just as the cases were heating up , the U.S. Supreme Court decision overturned a 1994 California law that retroactively eliminated the statute of limitations for sexual abuse cases .
So instead of criminal prosecution for the older cases , Hallinan was forced to change his strategy .
He wanted to hold the offenders accountable by releasing the clergy abuse files to the public and aiding the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Terence Hallinan made a big mistake .
He lost his reelection bid to Kamala Harris .
Of course , she had a little help from the local Catholic organizations that were freaking out over the prospect for Hallinan releasing the documents and helping the abuse victims .
As Peter Schweizer explained in Profiles in Corruption : Abuse of Power by America ’ s Progressive Elite : Harris had no particular ties to the Catholic Church or Catholic organizations , but the money still came in large , unprecedented sums .
Lawyer Joseph Russoniello @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of issues , including the handling of the church abuse scandal .
He served on the Catholic Church ’ s National Review Board ( NRB ) of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops .
The purpose of the NRB was to review Catholic Church abuse cases .
Russoniello was also a partner in the San Francisco law firm Cooley Godward .
Russoniello donated the maximum amount by law to her campaign , $ 1,250 , and his law firm added another $ 2,250 .
He also sat on Harris ’ s advisory council @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attorney .
Another law firm , Bingham McCutcheon , which handled legal matters for the archdiocese concerning Catholic Charities , donated $ 2,825 , the maximum allowed .
Curiously , Bingham McCutcheon had only donated to two other candidates running for office in San Francisco before , for a total of $ 650 .
As with Russoniello , their support was unusual .
Another law firm , Arguedas , Cassman Francisco priest against abuse claims at the time .
They donated $ 4,550 to Harris .
The lawyer in the case , Cristina @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s advisory council .
Beyond these law firms , board members of San Francisco Catholic archdiocese–related organizations and their family members donated another $ 50,950 to Harris ’ s campaign .
We don ’ t know if it was 100 % a quid pro quo , but it certainly smells like it because after she took office , the investigations of the abusers stopped as did the cooperation with the civil suits .
While her predecessor was going to release the papers from the archdiocese , Harris refused .
“ District Attorney @ @ @ @ @ @ @ molesters in prison , ” her office claimed .
“ We ’ re not interested in selling out our victims to look good in the paper.
” However , victims and victims advocates wanted the information released .
For example : D.A .
Kamala Harris refused to help the abuse victims in their civil actions .
Interviewed by the liberal Intercept , victims spoke the refusal of Kamala Harris to give them access to the archdiocese files that would help them with their cases , or even talk to them when they asked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kamala Harris for help , his abuser was working at the Saints Peter and Paul Church in San Francisco , a position that placed him in an environment filled with children .
In other words , Harris didn ’ t even care that the man was in another location where he could abuse kids .
Dominic De Lucca , a Burlingame , California , resident who says he was raped by a local priest when he was 12 years old , also said he was shocked that Harris declined to aggressively pursue clergy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ files .
“ I remember Kamala Harris , ” said De Lucca .
“ She didn ’ t want to have any meetings.
” He went on , “ She wanted the public to think this is an issue that happened years ago , that it doesn ’ t happen anymore .
Let ’ s just move on.
” Terence McAteer , a resident of Nevada City , California , says he was raped as a child by Austin Peter Keegan , an infamous San Francisco priest .
McAteer said he sees no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conceal the clergy abuse files , which had been used to indict his abuser but remain secret to this day .
“ Why not tell the story ?
” said McAteer .
“ I have no problem with my file being released .
I don ’ t have any great secrets .
It ’ s already in the newspaper .
I think the whole cloak of secrecy with the Catholic Church needs to be exposed.
” Several survivors of clergy abuse said they believed that Harris had declined to release the files in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has historically held sway as a major political force in San Francisco .
The Intercept published a video of its interview of Joey Piscitelli .
The video is at the bottom of this post .
Schweizer reported that “ in April 2010 , a journalist with the San Francisco Weekly asked for the records through California ’ s Public Records Act .
Harris ’ s office denied the request , offering conflicting explanations as to why they could not provide them .
Even after Kamala Harris left office , the records couldn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In 2019 , I [ Peter Schwiezer ] requested those records through a California attorney .
The San Francisco district attorney ’ s office responded that they no longer had them in their possession .
Were they destroyed ?
Were they moved somewhere else ?
It remains a disturbing mystery.
” Look , the above story is crucial , especially in the context of the 2020 election .
It is another example of how the mainstream media covers for liberal candidates .
If Kamala Harris was a Republican , the fact that she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and seems to have done it for campaign donations would be front-page news in the N.Y. Times and the Washington Post .
It ’ s not like it was a secret , Peter Schweizer ’ s book , Profiles in Corruption : Abuse of Power by America ’ s Progressive Elite was a best seller .
Obviously , I don ’ t agree with Kamala Harris ’ extreme leftist political positions , But IMHO this is much worse .
How can any human being ignore the cries of sexual abuse victims ?
They @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
When she took over from Terence Hallinan , Kamala Harris had all the information to help the victims , but she did nothing except hide the evidence .
Heck , the Democrats tried to impeach a president for making a phone call they didn ’ t like , but at their convention , they nominate a woman who covered up child molestation , for Vice President .
That ranks only slightly higher than the molesters themselves .
And one last thing .
Most of the information in this post came from Peter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Corruption : Abuse of Power by America ’ s Progressive Elite .
My post doesn ’ t even cover everything the book reveals about Harris , and there ’ s much more .
Via Peter ’ s painstaking research , his tome shows corrupt acts by Joe Biden , Cory Booker , Elizabeth Warren , Bernie Sanders .
Sherrod Brown , Amy Klobuchar , and Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti .
Regular readers of this site know I am a big fan of Peter Schweizer ’ s work .
Like much of his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Abuse of Power by America ’ s Progressive Elite is a must-read for anyone who believes it wrong when those with political power get to operate by a different set of rules than us , regular people .
To be honest , I can ’ t wait for the next one .
The video below is the Intercept interview of Joey Piscitelli :

Kamala Harris covered up molestation
Since the day she was named Joe Biden’s V.P. Kamala Harris (D-CA), the mainstream media has described Kamala Harris as a “moderate” who is so wonderful she practically walks on water. Sadly the media doesn’t vet Democrats, because if they did some vetting of Harris’ history as a prosecutor they would have discovered her disturbing record as the San Francisco DA–She refused to pursue child molestation criminal cases against Catholic priests investigated by her predecessor And when the victims asked her for help with their civil cases against those molesters the victims say she covered up the evidence. Coincidently (if you believe in coincidences) Kamala Harris received substantial campaign donations from people and organizations associated with the accused molesters and their defense.
In his book, Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite, Peter Schweizer unveils how Harris refused to pursue the case. And also exposes the fact that many of the law firms and lawyers who were representing the archdiocese on a variety of legal matters — including priests that had been identified as possible culprits — gave significant contributions to Harris’s political campaign. Some of them had never given contributions to a race like this before, but they came up with the cash for Kamala Harris.
As Schweizer wrote:
During her decade-and-a-half tenure as a chief prosecutor, Harris would fail to prosecute a single case of priest abuse and her office would strangely hide vital records on abuses that had occurred, despite the protests of victims’ groups. Harris’s predecessor as San Francisco district attorney, Terence Hallinan, was aware of and had prosecuted numerous Catholic priests on sexual misconduct involving children. And he had been gathering case files for even more… Hallinan’s office had launched an investigation and quickly discovered that the San Francisco Archdiocese had extensive internal records concerning complaints going back some seventy-five years. In spring of 2002, Hallinan demanded the church turn them over to his office.
Eventually, the archdiocese turned over the documents, and they were horrific. Supposedly the papers revealed the names of forty current and ex-priests who were accused of sexual abuse. DA Hallinan took the docs and began the process of bringing them to justice,
However, many of the cases were past what had been the statute of limitations. And just as the cases were heating up, the U.S. Supreme Court decision overturned a 1994 California law that retroactively eliminated the statute of limitations for sexual abuse cases. So instead of criminal prosecution for the older cases, Hallinan was forced to change his strategy. He wanted to hold the offenders accountable by releasing the clergy abuse files to the public and aiding the victims in civil cases.
But then Terence Hallinan made a big mistake. He lost his reelection bid to Kamala Harris. Of course, she had a little help from the local Catholic organizations that were freaking out over the prospect for Hallinan releasing the documents and helping the abuse victims. As Peter Schweizer explained in Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite:
Harris had no particular ties to the Catholic Church or Catholic organizations, but the money still came in large, unprecedented sums. Lawyer Joseph Russoniello represented the church on a wide variety of issues, including the handling of the church abuse scandal. He served on the Catholic Church’s National Review Board (NRB) of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. The purpose of the NRB was to review Catholic Church abuse cases. Russoniello was also a partner in the San Francisco law firm Cooley Godward. Russoniello donated the maximum amount by law to her campaign, $1,250, and his law firm added another $2,250. He also sat on Harris’s advisory council when she was San Francisco, district attorney. Another law firm, Bingham McCutcheon, which handled legal matters for the archdiocese concerning Catholic Charities, donated $2,825, the maximum allowed. Curiously, Bingham McCutcheon had only donated to two other candidates running for office in San Francisco before, for a total of $650. As with Russoniello, their support was unusual. Another law firm, Arguedas, Cassman Francisco priest against abuse claims at the time. They donated $4,550 to Harris. The lawyer in the case, Cristina Arguedas, also served on Kamala Harris’s advisory council. Beyond these law firms, board members of San Francisco Catholic archdiocese–related organizations and their family members donated another $50,950 to Harris’s campaign.
We don’t know if it was 100% a quid pro quo, but it certainly smells like it because after she took office, the investigations of the abusers stopped as did the cooperation with the civil suits. While her predecessor was going to release the papers from the archdiocese, Harris refused. “District Attorney Harris focuses her efforts on putting child molesters in prison,” her office claimed. “We’re not interested in selling out our victims to look good in the paper.” However, victims and victims advocates wanted the information released. For example:
They’re full of shit,” said Joey Piscitelli [a victim] and the northwest regional director of Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests (SNAP), the largest and most active victims group. “You can quote me on that. They’re not protecting the victims.” Rick Simons, an attorney who represented multiple victims of clergy abuse, also attacked Harris’s actions. Hiding the records “shows policy of ignoring the rights of children by one of the largest institutions of the city and county of San Francisco, and in the Bay Area.”
D.A. Kamala Harris refused to help the abuse victims in their civil actions. Interviewed by the liberal Intercept, victims spoke the refusal of Kamala Harris to give them access to the archdiocese files that would help them with their cases, or even talk to them when they asked for help:
“It went from Terence Hallinan going hundred miles an hour, full speed ahead, after the Catholic Church to Kamala Harris doing absolutely nothing and taking it backwards hundred miles an hour,” said Joey Piscitelli, a sexual assault survivor, who a jury found had been molested as a student while attending Salesian College Preparatory, a Catholic high school in Richmond, California. Piscitelli had met with Hallinan’s office to discuss his case and the ongoing investigation into the church. But, he said, when Harris took over, his access to the office was shut off and his requests for clergy abuse files were ignored. Piscitelli resorted to handing out flyers and picketing outside the district attorney’s office on San Francisco’s McAllister Street.
When Piscitelli was asking Kamala Harris for help, his abuser was working at the Saints Peter and Paul Church in San Francisco, a position that placed him in an environment filled with children. In other words, Harris didn’t even care that the man was in another location where he could abuse kids.
Dominic De Lucca, a Burlingame, California, resident who says he was raped by a local priest when he was 12 years old, also said he was shocked that Harris declined to aggressively pursue clergy abuse cases and refused to release the files. “I remember Kamala Harris,” said De Lucca. “She didn’t want to have any meetings.” He went on, “She wanted the public to think this is an issue that happened years ago, that it doesn’t happen anymore. Let’s just move on.” Terence McAteer, a resident of Nevada City, California, says he was raped as a child by Austin Peter Keegan, an infamous San Francisco priest. McAteer said he sees no value in Harris’s decision to conceal the clergy abuse files, which had been used to indict his abuser but remain secret to this day. “Why not tell the story?” said McAteer. “I have no problem with my file being released. I don’t have any great secrets. It’s already in the newspaper. I think the whole cloak of secrecy with the Catholic Church needs to be exposed.” Several survivors of clergy abuse said they believed that Harris had declined to release the files in deference to the Catholic Church, which has historically held sway as a major political force in San Francisco.
The Intercept published a video of its interview of Joey Piscitelli. The video is at the bottom of this post.
Schweizer reported that “in April 2010, a journalist with the San Francisco Weekly asked for the records through California’s Public Records Act. Harris’s office denied the request, offering conflicting explanations as to why they could not provide them.
Even after Kamala Harris left office, the records couldn’t be shared because they disappeared “In 2019, I [Peter Schwiezer] requested those records through a California attorney. The San Francisco district attorney’s office responded that they no longer had them in their possession. Were they destroyed? Were they moved somewhere else? It remains a disturbing mystery.”
Look, the above story is crucial, especially in the context of the 2020 election.
It is another example of how the mainstream media covers for liberal candidates. If Kamala Harris was a Republican, the fact that she threw sexual abuse victims under the bus and seems to have done it for campaign donations would be front-page news in the N.Y. Times and the Washington Post. It’s not like it was a secret, Peter Schweizer’s book, Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite was a best seller.
Obviously, I don’t agree with Kamala Harris’ extreme leftist political positions, But IMHO this is much worse. How can any human being ignore the cries of sexual abuse victims? They were children for heaven’s sake. When she took over from Terence Hallinan, Kamala Harris had all the information to help the victims, but she did nothing except hide the evidence. Heck, the Democrats tried to impeach a president for making a phone call they didn’t like, but at their convention, they nominate a woman who covered up child molestation, for Vice President. That ranks only slightly higher than the molesters themselves.
And one last thing. Most of the information in this post came from Peter Schweizer’s book, Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite. My post doesn’t even cover everything the book reveals about Harris, and there’s much more. Via Peter’s painstaking research, his tome shows corrupt acts by Joe Biden, Cory Booker, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders. Sherrod Brown, Amy Klobuchar, and Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti.
Regular readers of this site know I am a big fan of Peter Schweizer’s work. Like much of his previous work, Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite is a must-read for anyone who believes it wrong when those with political power get to operate by a different set of rules than us, regular people. To be honest, I can’t wait for the next one.
The video below is the Intercept interview of Joey Piscitelli:
Kamala Harris covered up molestation
Kamala Harris covered up molestation
Kamala Harris covered up molestation
Kamala Harris covered up molestation
. Https://lidblog.com


thelibertydaily--2020-10-08--VP Debate Moderator Susan Page is as Biased as They Come

When Susan Page was announced a month ago as the moderator for the Vice Presidential Debate , many heralded the selection as a truly unbiased choice .
She is not one of the cable news networks ’ talking heads and has never expressed an opinion about debaters Mike Pence or Kamala Harris that would indicate bias .
But dig a little deeper and we see that she ’ s not only surrounded by ( and married to ) those who adamantly oppose the current administration , but has also been very cozy with one of the most powerful Democrats in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ start with her upcoming book , “ Madam Speaker : Nancy Pelosi and the Lessons of Power.
” Some will point out she has written books about multiple politicians , including former First Lady Barbara Bush .
This is true .
But considering the rhetoric that has been coming from Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi for the last four years , one would be remiss to not see a challenge with a moderator who literally wrote a book about the President ’ s greatest political foe in DC .
What about her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into her political leanings from her family ’ s donation habits ?
Let ’ s see… Families are diverse .
There are Democrats in my family , for example , and it makes for interesting non-conversations during holiday reunions .
But the best insight into a person ’ s personal political beliefs can usually be found in the spouse .
It ’ s not impossible for people of opposing political views to be married , but it ’ s often challenging , particularly when the family is made up of people in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
So what does Susan Page ’ s husband think about the election ?
For that answer , we turn again to independent journalist Paul Sperry : Like I said , there are Kellyanne and George Conways out there , so this is not a “ smoking gun ” about her bias .
It ’ s highly likely that based on the circumstantial evidence she ’ s either left-leaning or a glutton for familial punishment , but that ’ s just circumstantial .
Has Susan Page herself ever said anything about the President @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has… VP Debate moderator Susan Page has an upcoming book about Nancy Pelosi .
Her family donates to anti-Trump groups .
Her husband speaks out against the President publicly , as has she .
Unbiased moderator ?
Nope .
COVID-19 may take down an independent news outlet Nobody said running a media site would be easy .
We could use some help keeping this site afloat .
Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever .
My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet .
Paying the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but we ’ ve survived .
We have ads on the site that help , but since the site ’ s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn ’ t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it .
When I left a nice , corporate career in 2017 , I did so knowing I wouldn ’ t make nearly as much money .
But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it for the sake of wealth .
We know we ’ ll never make a ton of money this way , and we ’ re okay with that .
Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns .
Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically .
We thought we could weather the storm , but the so-called “ surge ” or “ 2nd-wave ” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy .
In short , we are now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate .
Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly .
Alternatively , you can donate through PayPal as well .
We need approximately $ 11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020 , but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated .
The second way to help is to become a partner .
We ’ ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t seem necessary .
Now , we ’ re struggling to pay the bills .
This shouldn ’ t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically .
June , 2018 , we had 11,678 visitors .
A year later in June , 2019 , we were up to 116,194 .
In June , 2020 , we had 614,192 .
We ’ re heading in the right direction and we believe we ’ re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “ get @ @ @ @ @ @ @ importantly who want to help America hear the truth .
Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above .
Election year or not , coronavirus lockdowns or not , anarchic riots or not , the need for truthful journalism endures .
But in these times , we need as many conservative media voices as possible .
Please help keep NOQ Report going .
Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
The coronavirus crisis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , to promote authoritarianism .
It ’ s understandable to some extent now , but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life .
We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
When Susan Page was announced a month ago as the moderator for the Vice Presidential Debate, many heralded the selection as a truly unbiased choice. She is not one of the cable news networks’ talking heads and has never expressed an opinion about debaters Mike Pence or Kamala Harris that would indicate bias. But dig a little deeper and we see that she’s not only surrounded by (and married to) those who adamantly oppose the current administration, but has also been very cozy with one of the most powerful Democrats in Washington, DC.
Let’s start with her upcoming book, “Madam Speaker: Nancy Pelosi and the Lessons of Power.”
Meet tonight's VP Debate moderator, Susan Page. Oh and it looks like she has a book out, too. ?? pic.twitter.com/PxWrmM8BQM — Cari Kelemen (@KelemenCari) October 7, 2020
Some will point out she has written books about multiple politicians, including former First Lady Barbara Bush. This is true. But considering the rhetoric that has been coming from Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi for the last four years, one would be remiss to not see a challenge with a moderator who literally wrote a book about the President’s greatest political foe in DC.
What about her family? Can we glean any insight into her political leanings from her family’s donation habits? Let’s see…
Tonight's debate moderator Susan Page's family supports The Lincoln Project ("Republicans & Independents For Biden"): "DONALD TRUMP IS KILLING US"https://t.co/NDhI0OnTfz — Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) October 7, 2020
Families are diverse. There are Democrats in my family, for example, and it makes for interesting non-conversations during holiday reunions. But the best insight into a person’s personal political beliefs can usually be found in the spouse. It’s not impossible for people of opposing political views to be married, but it’s often challenging, particularly when the family is made up of people in the public eye. Just ask Kellyanne Conway. So what does Susan Page’s husband think about the election? For that answer, we turn again to independent journalist Paul Sperry:
Susan Leubsdorf Page's columnist hubby: "Less than 24 hrs after Trump stumbled thru a mistake-laden, misleading Oval Office speech on the pandemic,Biden outlined a series of proposed federal governmental actions in a presentation that sounded more presidential than the president" — Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) October 7, 2020
Tonight's debate moderator Susan Leubsdorf Page's Washington columnist hubby not exactly a Trump-Pence fan: How is the Trump presidency going? “About as I expected.” — Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) October 7, 2020
This is tonight's debate moderator's husband's opinion of President Trump: Carl P. Leubsdorf: Trump's lies go on and onhttps://t.co/z4qivPFfCf — Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) October 7, 2020
Like I said, there are Kellyanne and George Conways out there, so this is not a “smoking gun” about her bias. It’s highly likely that based on the circumstantial evidence she’s either left-leaning or a glutton for familial punishment, but that’s just circumstantial. Has Susan Page herself ever said anything about the President? Why, yes, yes she has…
Susan Page: Trump a ‘Big Threat’ to GOP’s 2016 Chances https://t.co/aBpOW3VKwx — Jason Miller (@JasonMillerinDC) October 7, 2020
VP Debate moderator Susan Page has an upcoming book about Nancy Pelosi. Her family donates to anti-Trump groups. Her husband speaks out against the President publicly, as has she. Unbiased moderator? Nope.
COVID-19 may take down an independent news outlet
Nobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.
Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it.
When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that.
Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance.
We’re LIVE and everything is on sale for a limited time! Whole Cows has launched offering freeze-dried beef for long-term storage. Don’t wait for food shortages to get worse. Stock up today. Use promo code “launch15” at checkout for 15% off!
The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated.
The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above.
Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.
Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast.
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


thelibertydaily--2020-10-08--Rush Limbaugh and Others Identify One of Many Fraudulent Characteristics In Recent Garbage Polls fro

Rush Limbaugh and Others Identify One of Many Fraudulent Characteristics In Recent Garbage Polls from the Radical Left

Recent polls released by entities like CNN are garbage .
We all know it .
Below are some reasons why .
CNN and a few other far-left media outlets have VP Joe Biden leading President Trump in the race for the 2020 election .
Clearly something is wrong with these polls .
Rush Limbaugh recently shared on the recent polls coming out that are outrageous if not fraudulent .
Townhall reported : Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh zeroed-in on how these pollsters are picking their GOP samples .
To no one ’ s shock , they ’ re skewing these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voters who are more hostile to Trump .
And of course , they averse to sampling rural Republicans who are die-hard Trump supporters .
In essence , the ‘ R-split ’ are pretty much soft Democrats at this point , as suburban voters are notoriously squishy with zero backbone .
TRENDING : VICE PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE : VP Mike Pence vs. Kamala Harris -- With Pelosi Biographer Susan Page as Moderator -- Live-Stream RSBN Video Political commentator Larry Schweikart believes that the polls used by some of the extreme polling companies are so extreme @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they are selecting locations unfavorable to the President in their Republican samples : Schweikart summarizes that the polling companies can get away with fraudulent polling again because the media will never call them out for their corrupt representations :

Recent polls released by entities like CNN are garbage. We all know it. Below are some reasons why.
CNN and a few other far-left media outlets have VP Joe Biden leading President Trump in the race for the 2020 election. Clearly something is wrong with these polls.
Rush Limbaugh recently shared on the recent polls coming out that are outrageous if not fraudulent. Townhall reported:
Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh zeroed-in on how these pollsters are picking their GOP samples. To no one’s shock, they’re skewing these surveys by overloading it with suburban Republican voters who are more hostile to Trump. And of course, they averse to sampling rural Republicans who are die-hard Trump supporters. In essence, the ‘R-split’ are pretty much soft Democrats at this point, as suburban voters are notoriously squishy with zero backbone.
Political commentator Larry Schweikart believes that the polls used by some of the extreme polling companies are so extreme when compared to more reasonable polling because they are selecting locations unfavorable to the President in their Republican samples:
1) contd. . . zip codes with blue-collar Trump-type DemoKKKrat voters. 2) In this way, they can “claim” to have legit D/R splits (which as we know are STILL about +5 to +9 D), but in fact they are getting the most Trump-hostile Rs and eliminating the most Trump-friendly Ds. — Larry Schweikart (@LarrySchweikart) September 28, 2020
Schweikart summarizes that the polling companies can get away with fraudulent polling again because the media will never call them out for their corrupt representations:
4) contd . . . get away with this a second time is that they believe the Hoax News media will cover for them; that if they blow it badly again, no one will call them to account (among the “bigs”); and so they are safe in mis-polling a second time. — Larry Schweikart (@LarrySchweikart) September 28, 2020
Same thing different election.


thelibertydaily--2020-10-08--The Socialist Who Justifies Murdering Children

It ’ s not a good look .
Especially not for a leader of a movement that stresses human equality and fights those who oppress the poor and the marginalized .
Bhaskar Sunkara tweeted “ The question isn ’ t what we think justice demands .
I think killing little Romanov children was justified .
But it ’ s not surprising why these views are controversial given most people ’ s ethical and moral frameworks.
” When the Bolsheviks took over Russia , they had to decide what to do with the Czar and his family .
They could have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in prison .
They decided to kill them all .
Even the children .
That way , they didn ’ t have to worry that the Russian people would try to restore the monarchy .
The end ( securing the revolution ) justified the means ( murder ) .
Which meant they happily built Soviet socialism by shooting children , kicking them in the head , and stabbing them with bayonets .
Great , says a leading American socialist .
You can ’ t make omelettes without breaking eggs , as the old @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
He took down the tweet .
But it tells us what he really thinks .
He thinks you can kill innocent children to get what you want .
What the Socialist Should Not Say Sunkara founded and now edits the journal Jacobin .
He ’ s gotten the attention of the New York Times and the other big journals .
Fortune named him one of its forty under forty .
The avowedly socialist magazine , very well produced , and cleverly aimed at the general reader , endorses leftist causes .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rightist magazine Reason : a committed political magazine not written by dweebs that people flee at parties .
Bernie supporters and members of the Democratic Socialists of America follow it .
Its editors and writers look down on Biden and Clinton as capitalists .
They think liberalism just a slightly more statist form of neo-liberalism .
They present the classic socialist dream .
Jacobin wants to create the new socialist society in which everyone will be valued and respected and have what they need .
The kind of dream one may think idealistic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anyone should accept .
Even a libertarian should recognize that they want a good thing , even if he thinks they ’ ll actually create the opposite .
Their editor thinks killing children justified .
The socialist should not say this .
He should see what it allows .
If you can kill little children to get what you want , you can do anything .
You can kill socialists , for example .
By the way , there ’ s one irony to Sunkara ’ s despicable claim — and his critics @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they focus on the czar ’ s children .
Also murdered were their valet , cook , and parlor maid .
( The brutes even killed their dog . )
Members of the working class .
People whose lives a socialist of all people should protect .
Even the socialist feels their lives not only worth taking , but worth forgetting .
Compare Sunkara with one of the last century ’ s socialist heroes , the writer George Orwell .
He was all-in on socialism .
As he explained in an essay called @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written , directly or indirectly , against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism , as I understand it.
” A near atheist , Orwell didn ’ t believe morality had any sort of transcendent justification .
But he knew some actions are wrong .
Some of his examples relate to Sunkara ’ s claim .
He often used kicking a baby in the stomach as an example of something that ’ s just wrong .
It ’ s evil , period @ @ @ @ @ @ @ You could never justify it as a lesser evil or as a means to an end .
It ’ s wrong .
Orwell saw — unlike Sunkara —the ultimate worth of human beings .
That included not just little children but the unborn .
In his early novel Keep the Aphidistra Flying , the main character ’ s girlfriend thinks about aborting their child .
“ That pulled him up .
For the first time he grasped , with the only kind of knowledge that matters , what they were really talking about.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ baby ” no longer meant “ a mere abstract disaster , they meant a bud of flesh , a bit of himself , down there in her belly , alive and growing .
… He knew then that it was a dreadful thing they were contemplating — a blasphemy , if that word had any meaning.
” He spoke bitterly of Sunkara ’ s kind of moral calculus .
In “ Notes on Nationalism , ” one of his most famous essays , Orwell condemned the idea that “ Actions are held to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their own merits but according to who does them.
” He noted bitterly that in the politics of his day , “ there is almost no kind of outrage – torture , the use of hostages , forced labour , mass deportations , imprisonment without trial , forgery , assassination , the bombing of civilians – which does not change its moral colour when it is committed by ‘ our ’ side.
” That the left did this really upset him .
In the same essay , he noted “ In 1927 Chiang @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and yet within ten years he had become one of the heroes of the Left .
The realignment of world politics had brought him into the anti-Fascist camp , and so it was felt that the boiling of the Communists ‘ didn ’ t count ’ , or perhaps had not happened.
” The same moral sense drives his most famous essay , one you might have read in college , “ Politics and the English Language.
” Orwell knew something Sunkara doesn ’ t .
Only a belief in absolute right and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It has to be the right belief , of course , one that sees the intrinsic dignity of the human person .
Relativism — the belief that lets the socialist editor say “ I think killing little Romanov children was justified ” — takes away the one intellectual support the poor have .
It steals their ability to say “ You can ’ t treat me like that ” and “ I deserve to be treated well.
” It takes from them their claim to be treated as ends , not means @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people want for them , or from them .
As one of contemporary literature ’ s greatest villains put it , just before he tries to kill a little boy who ’ s gotten in his way : “ There is no good and evil , there is only power and those too weak to seek it.
” Sunkara wants economic equality .
Suppose someone else wants economic inequality ?
Suppose that person believes some people are made to be oppressed ?
And has the power to get his way ?
Who ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the social darwinist ?
No one .
It ’ s one man ’ s choice against another ’ s .
The second ’ s a barbarian , but Sunkara gave up the grounds for calling him that .
Because he chose barbarism as well .
David Mills is a senior editor of The Stream .
After teaching writing in a seminary , he has been editor of Touchstone and the executive editor of First Things .
He edits the site Hour of Our Death and writes a weekly column for The Catholic Herald @

It’s not a good look. Especially not for a leader of a movement that stresses human equality and fights those who oppress the poor and the marginalized. Bhaskar Sunkara tweeted “The question isn’t what we think justice demands. I think killing little Romanov children was justified. But it’s not surprising why these views are controversial given most people’s ethical and moral frameworks.”
When the Bolsheviks took over Russia, they had to decide what to do with the Czar and his family. They could have sent them into exile or put them in prison. They decided to kill them all. Even the children. That way, they didn’t have to worry that the Russian people would try to restore the monarchy. The end (securing the revolution) justified the means (murder).
Which meant they happily built Soviet socialism by shooting children, kicking them in the head, and stabbing them with bayonets. Great, says a leading American socialist. You can’t make omelettes without breaking eggs, as the old saying goes.
Not a good look. He took down the tweet. But it tells us what he really thinks. He thinks you can kill innocent children to get what you want.
What the Socialist Should Not Say
Sunkara founded and now edits the journal Jacobin. He’s gotten the attention of the New York Times and the other big journals. Fortune named him one of its forty under forty. The avowedly socialist magazine, very well produced, and cleverly aimed at the general reader, endorses leftist causes. It’s the leftist equivalent to the rightist magazine Reason: a committed political magazine not written by dweebs that people flee at parties.
Bernie supporters and members of the Democratic Socialists of America follow it. Its editors and writers look down on Biden and Clinton as capitalists. They think liberalism just a slightly more statist form of neo-liberalism.
They present the classic socialist dream. Jacobin wants to create the new socialist society in which everyone will be valued and respected and have what they need. The kind of dream one may think idealistic and even foolish, but an ideal anyone should accept. Even a libertarian should recognize that they want a good thing, even if he thinks they’ll actually create the opposite.
Their editor thinks killing children justified. The socialist should not say this. He should see what it allows. If you can kill little children to get what you want, you can do anything. You can kill socialists, for example.
By the way, there’s one irony to Sunkara’s despicable claim — and his critics’ responses as well. He and they focus on the czar’s children. Also murdered were their valet, cook, and parlor maid. (The brutes even killed their dog.) Members of the working class. People whose lives a socialist of all people should protect. Even the socialist feels their lives not only worth taking, but worth forgetting.
Orwell’s Socialist Morality
Compare Sunkara with one of the last century’s socialist heroes, the writer George Orwell. He was all-in on socialism. As he explained in an essay called “Why I Write”: “Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism, as I understand it.”
A near atheist, Orwell didn’t believe morality had any sort of transcendent justification. But he knew some actions are wrong. Some of his examples relate to Sunkara’s claim. He often used kicking a baby in the stomach as an example of something that’s just wrong. It’s evil, period. Nothing could justify doing it. You could never justify it as a lesser evil or as a means to an end. It’s wrong.
Orwell saw — unlike Sunkara —the ultimate worth of human beings. That included not just little children but the unborn. In his early novel Keep the Aphidistra Flying, the main character’s girlfriend thinks about aborting their child. “That pulled him up. For the first time he grasped, with the only kind of knowledge that matters, what they were really talking about.”
Now, the words “a baby” no longer meant “a mere abstract disaster, they meant a bud of flesh, a bit of himself, down there in her belly, alive and growing. … He knew then that it was a dreadful thing they were contemplating — a blasphemy, if that word had any meaning.”
He spoke bitterly of Sunkara’s kind of moral calculus. In “Notes on Nationalism,” one of his most famous essays, Orwell condemned the idea that “Actions are held to be good or bad, not on their own merits but according to who does them.” He noted bitterly that in the politics of his day, “there is almost no kind of outrage – torture, the use of hostages, forced labour, mass deportations, imprisonment without trial, forgery, assassination, the bombing of civilians – which does not change its moral colour when it is committed by ‘our’ side.”
That the left did this really upset him. In the same essay, he noted “In 1927 Chiang Kai-Shek boiled hundreds of Communists alive, and yet within ten years he had become one of the heroes of the Left. The realignment of world politics had brought him into the anti-Fascist camp, and so it was felt that the boiling of the Communists ‘didn’t count’, or perhaps had not happened.”
The same moral sense drives his most famous essay, one you might have read in college, “Politics and the English Language.”
Sunkara’s Big Mistake
Orwell knew something Sunkara doesn’t. Only a belief in absolute right and wrong can protect the poor and marginalized. It has to be the right belief, of course, one that sees the intrinsic dignity of the human person.
Relativism — the belief that lets the socialist editor say “I think killing little Romanov children was justified” — takes away the one intellectual support the poor have. It steals their ability to say “You can’t treat me like that” and “I deserve to be treated well.” It takes from them their claim to be treated as ends, not means.
And replaces it with whatever other people want for them, or from them. As one of contemporary literature’s greatest villains put it, just before he tries to kill a little boy who’s gotten in his way: “There is no good and evil, there is only power and those too weak to seek it.”
Sunkara wants economic equality. Suppose someone else wants economic inequality? Suppose that person believes some people are made to be oppressed? And has the power to get his way? Who’s to choose between the socialist and the social darwinist?
No one. It’s one man’s choice against another’s. The second’s a barbarian, but Sunkara gave up the grounds for calling him that. Because he chose barbarism as well.
David Mills is a senior editor of The Stream. After teaching writing in a seminary, he has been editor of Touchstone and the executive editor of First Things. He edits the site Hour of Our Death and writes a weekly column for The Catholic Herald.


thelibertydaily--2020-10-08--Democrat Alexandria Ocrazio-Cortex Triggered by Mike Pence, Calls ‘Green New Deal’ Communist Takeove

Democrat Alexandria Ocrazio-Cortex Triggered by Mike Pence, Calls ‘Green New Deal’ Communist Takeover of Energy ‘Popular’

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ( D-N.Y. ) is not holding back in showing her distaste for Vice President Mike Pence .
“ For the record [ Mike Pence ] , it ’ s Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez to you , ” Ocasio-Cortez wrote on Twitter during the vice-presidential debate on Wednesday night after the vice president referred to her as “ AOC ” when discussing the Green New Deal .
In another tweet , the New York lawmaker suggested Pence “ doesn ’ t seem to have to answer any of the questions asked of him in this debate.
” Ocasio-Cortez also said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the debate .
“ Pence demanding that Harris answer *his* own personal questions when he won ’ t even answer the moderator ’ s is gross , and exemplary of the gender dynamics so many women have to deal with at work , ” she wrote on Twitter .
Touching on climate change , Ocasio-Cortez said the Green New Deal “ is and has been lied about nonstop , and yet is STILL popular.
” “ It ’ s okay to call the GOP out on those lies just as we call them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” she said .
Her remarks regarding the Green New Deal came as Pence clashed with Sen. Kamala Harris ( D-Calif. ) on climate change during the debate .
“ The climate is changing .
The issue is , what ’ s the cause and what do we do about it ?
President Trump has made it clear that we ’ re going to continue to listen to science , ” Pence said .
He added later , “ There are no more hurricanes today than there were 100 years ago .
But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and wildfires to try and sell a bill of goods of a Green New Deal.
” Biden has said repeatedly he does not support the Green New Deal .
The debate was held at the University of Utah ’ s Kingsbury Hall in Salt Lake City .
It was the first and only vice-presidential debate ahead of the general election on Nov. 3 .
The other two presidential debates are scheduled for Oct. 15 and Oct. 22 .
The second presidential debate will be virtual , the Commission on Presidential Debates announced on @ @

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) is not holding back in showing her distaste for Vice President Mike Pence.
“For the record [Mike Pence], it’s Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez to you,” Ocasio-Cortez wrote on Twitter during the vice-presidential debate on Wednesday night after the vice president referred to her as “AOC” when discussing the Green New Deal.
For the record @Mike_Pence, it’s Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez to you. — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) October 8, 2020
In another tweet, the New York lawmaker suggested Pence “doesn’t seem to have to answer any of the questions asked of him in this debate.”
Why is it that Mike Pence doesn’t seem to have to answer any of the questions asked of him in this debate? — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) October 8, 2020
Ocasio-Cortez also said there was “gender dynamics” during the debate.
“Pence demanding that Harris answer *his* own personal questions when he won’t even answer the moderator’s is gross, and exemplary of the gender dynamics so many women have to deal with at work,” she wrote on Twitter.
Pence demanding that Harris answer *his* own personal questions when he won’t even answer the moderator’s is gross, and exemplary of the gender dynamics so many women have to deal with at work. — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) October 8, 2020
Touching on climate change, Ocasio-Cortez said the Green New Deal “is and has been lied about nonstop, and yet is STILL popular.”
“It’s okay to call the GOP out on those lies just as we call them out on all their other lies,” she said.
The Green New Deal is and has been lied about nonstop, and yet is STILL popular. It’s a massive job-creation and infrastructure plan to decarbonize & increase quality of work and life. It’s okay to call the GOP out on those lies just as we call them out on all their other lies. — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) October 8, 2020
Her remarks regarding the Green New Deal came as Pence clashed with Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) on climate change during the debate.
“The climate is changing. The issue is, what’s the cause and what do we do about it? President Trump has made it clear that we’re going to continue to listen to science,” Pence said.
He added later, “There are no more hurricanes today than there were 100 years ago. But many of the climate alarmists use hurricanes and wildfires to try and sell a bill of goods of a Green New Deal.”
Biden has said repeatedly he does not support the Green New Deal.
.@VP @Mike_Pence on #ClimateChange: "There are no more hurricanes today than there were 100 years ago. But many of the climate alarmists use hurricanes and wildfires to try and sell a bill of goods of a green new deal…."#Debates2020 pic.twitter.com/BD1g9AbcLu — Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) October 8, 2020
The debate was held at the University of Utah’s Kingsbury Hall in Salt Lake City. It was the first and only vice-presidential debate ahead of the general election on Nov. 3.
The other two presidential debates are scheduled for Oct. 15 and Oct. 22. The second presidential debate will be virtual, the Commission on Presidential Debates announced on Thursday.
Truth and Accuracy
Submit a Correction * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success!
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.
Comment Down Below


thelibertydaily--2020-10-08--President Trump Says He Won’t ‘Waste My Time’ in ‘Virtual’ Debate With Biden: ‘That’s Not What Debat

President Trump Says He Won’t ‘Waste My Time’ in ‘Virtual’ Debate With Biden: ‘That’s Not What Debating is All About’ . . .

Sign up for our special edition newsletter to get updates on the 2020 presidential election and more .
President Trump on Thursday said he won ’ t “ waste my time ” participating in a virtual debate with former Vice President Joe Biden , responding to an announcement by the Commission on Presidential Debates that the candidates would be in remote locations for the contest next week .
“ No , I ’ m not going to waste my time in a virtual debate , ” Trump said on Fox Business .
“ That ’ s not what debating is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ computer and do … and then they cut you off whenever they want , ” he continued .
He said the commission is trying to protect Biden .
The president said he just learned about the change in the format Thursday morning .
“ We learned it the same way you learned it , they called up , ” he told Maria Bartiromo .
“ Two minutes ago and it was announced , and they ’ re trying to protect Biden , ” he said .
“ That ’ s not acceptable to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the first debate , according to the polls that I ’ ve seen .
But I beat him easily , and I felt I beat him easily .
I think he felt it , too , ” Trump said .
The next presidential debate will be held Oct. 15 in Miami .

Sign up for our special edition newsletter to get updates on the 2020 presidential election and more.
President Trump on Thursday said he won’t “waste my time” participating in a virtual debate with former Vice President Joe Biden, responding to an announcement by the Commission on Presidential Debates that the candidates would be in remote locations for the contest next week.
“No, I’m not going to waste my time in a virtual debate,” Trump said on Fox Business.
“That’s not what debating is all about. You sit behind a computer and do … and then they cut you off whenever they want,” he continued.
He said the commission is trying to protect Biden.
The president said he just learned about the change in the format Thursday morning.
“We learned it the same way you learned it, they called up,” he told Maria Bartiromo.
“Two minutes ago and it was announced, and they’re trying to protect Biden,” he said.
“That’s not acceptable to us. I beat him easily in the first debate, according to the polls that I’ve seen. But I beat him easily, and I felt I beat him easily. I think he felt it, too,” Trump said.
The next presidential debate will be held Oct. 15 in Miami.


thelibertydaily--2020-10-08--. . . ‘Do a Rally Instead’

. . . ‘Do a Rally Instead’

The Commission on Presidential Debates announced this morning that the second debate between President Trump and former Vice President Joe @ @ @ @ @ separate locations because of the president Covid-19 infection : And the president won ’ t @ @ @ @ @ A virtual format would benefit the elderly Dem , that ’ s for sure : @ @ @ @ @ change at any moment : Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien , who also tested positive @ @ @ @ @ a statement that they ’ ll “ do a rally instead ” :

The Commission on Presidential Debates announced this morning that the second debate between President Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden will take virtually in separate locations because of the president Covid-19 infection:
The Commission on Presidential Debates announces the second debate between President Trump and Joe Biden will be virtual "in the form of a town meeting, in which the candidates would participate from separate remote locations." — Kaitlan Collins (@kaitlancollins) October 8, 2020
And the president won’t be part of it:
“I’m not gonna do a virtual debate,” Trump said on Fox Business just now. — Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) October 8, 2020
He added:
Trump says he doesn’t like idea of virtual debate because “they cut you off whenever they want.” — Jim Acosta (@Acosta) October 8, 2020
A virtual format would benefit the elderly Dem, that’s for sure:
. @JoeBiden needs to use notes to answer questions. He wants a virtual debate so he can read answers written by staff. — Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) October 8, 2020
Of course, things could change at any moment:
Let’s see if the debates are really over. Trump could change his mind. So could the commission in some form.. — Matthew Cooper (@mattizcoop) October 8, 2020
Watch:
"I'm not going to waste my time on a virtual debate" — Trump, on with Maria Bartiromo, begins his first post-coronavirus interview by saying he's pulling out of the second debate. (He sounds a little hoarse.) pic.twitter.com/R43JSszfll — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) October 8, 2020
Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien, who also tested positive for Covid-19, said in a statement that they’ll “do a rally instead”:
“We’ll pass on this sad excuse to bail out Joe Biden and do a rally instead,” Trump campaign manager @BillStepien says in a statement. — Jennifer Epstein (@jeneps) October 8, 2020
Full statement:
Campaign manager says Trump would have posted several negative tests by debate time (which isn’t possible to know right now) and that they’ll do a rally instead. pic.twitter.com/bctppZft9H — Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) October 8, 2020
***


thelibertydaily--2020-10-08--Hollywood Leftists Spew Foul Insults At Pence And His Wife After Debate

A CNN reporter angrily whined about President Trump triumphantly removing his mask outside the White House Monday night , leading the President ’ s campaign staff to release video of the very same reporter casually removing her own mask inside the White House after cameras had stopped rolling .
CNN White House correspondent Kaitlan Collins commented on Trump ’ s return from Walter Reed hospital , seeming to be bitter about the level of care he received , and complained about Trump urging Americans not to live in fear .
“ What the president is portraying by taking his mask @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Truman balcony to give this grand return to the White House , is that everything is fine and , as he said , don ’ t let coronavirus control your life , ” Collins stated .
“ But that is very much still a president who has coronavirus , ” Collins continued , adding “ Despite the lights and the flags and the staged entrance that the president wants to create , he still has coronavirus and he is only a few days into the diagnosis.
” Collins also tweeted out the video @ @ @ @ @ @ @ days into his diagnosis , the first thing President Trump does when he gets back to the White House is take his mask off.
” The Trump campaign noted that when Collins herself takes off her own mask inside the White House , apparently that is not a problem : How dare the leader of the country make a stand , urging people not to live in fear , and how dare he want things to return to normal !
Clearly not , as the video evidence shows .
She just hates the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ complained that Trump “ looks like he has makeup on , which means somebody had to get close enough to make up his face with his favourite orange patina , ” while also proclaiming that Trump ’ s stance and salute on the balcony was a “ Mussolini moment ” , and that he appeared like “ a member of the old Russian Tsar family ” :

The usual leftist Hollywood crowd directed a torrent of abuse at Vice President Mike Pence following a debate which he clearly won, primarily because Kamala Harris’ performance was so robotically awful.
The leftist celebrities, who definitely do speak for the whole of America, took to Twitter to vent their outrage that their candidate was made to look a fool.
Conan O’Brien declared that Pence’s performance had “locked up the white suburban mortician vote.”
Looks like Mike Pence has locked up the white suburban mortician vote. — Conan O'Brien (@ConanOBrien) October 8, 2020
Actress Lea DeLaria spewed a verbal attack on Pence and his wife, writing “I know you publicly call your wife “mother” @VP but what do you call her when she’s pegging you?”
I know you publicly call your wife “mother” @VP but what do you call her when she’s pegging you? — Lea DeLaria (@realleadelaria) October 8, 2020
Another actor Bradley Whitford, whoever he is, compared Pence to a pedophile priest:
Pence has the aw-shucks nonchalance of a priest telling you it's okay to take your pants off. Without the moral stature. — Bradley Whitford (@BradleyWhitford) October 8, 2020
Another “actor”, Billy Eichner made his point about Pence with the elegance of a crack addled lunatic:
THE WHITE HOUSE ITSELF IS A FUCKING COVID HOTSPOT GO HOME WITH YOUR BIGOT WIFE YOU FUCKING HOMOPHOBE — billy eichner (@billyeichner) October 8, 2020
This is the same leftist Hollywood crowd who have been wracking their brains for an effective method of defeating Trump/Pence, and came up with getting naked as a solution:
When they go low…


thelibertydaily--2020-10-08--Awful Kamala Harris Debate Performance Boosts Trump Reelection Chances

Kamala Harris put in a terrible performance at last night ’ s Vice Presidential debate , often appearing robotic and repeating memorised “ facts ” that blatantly contradicted things Joe Biden had said in last week ’ s debate .
Harris also appeared lost and confounded whenever Mike Pence interrupted her to point out such inconsistencies , as if she had been thrown off course from reading a script .
A prime example off this occurred when Harris claimed that Biden is not going to raise taxes , to which Pence pointed out that last week Biden himself promised to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ On Coronavirus , Harris declared that “ frankly this administration has forfeited their right to re-election because of this , ” but then outlined the Biden-Harris plan , which Pence pointed out is pretty much exactly the same as the Trump administration ’ s , adding the zinger “ It looks a little like plagiarism , which Joe Biden knows a little something about.
” Pence also noted that when Trump prevented flights from China in January , Biden labeled it “ xenophobic.
” When Pence framed the debate by saying the American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Harris got riled and snapped : On the climate , Pence declared that The Green New Deal , sponsored by Harris , “ would crush ” American energy , while noting that “ The US has reduced CO2 more than the countries that are in The Paris Accord.
” When Harris noted that Biden will not ban fracking , Pence pointed out that “ Both of you repeatedly committed to banning fossil fuel and banning fracking.
” President Trump took to Twitter to note the inconsistency : When the debate turned to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the trade war with China , to which Pence shot back “ You said Trump lost a trade war with China , Joe Biden never fought one.
” The Vice President also labelled Biden “ a cheerleader for communist China.
” When the debate turned to the Supreme Court , Pence asked if Democrats would pack the court , a question which Harris first attempted to avoid , then eventually had to address : Harris claimed that “ Trump packed the district courts with white people !
” prompting Pence to explain what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Donald Trump Jr chimed in on Twitter , explaining why Harris avoided the question : The final zinger came when the debate turned to the topic of transfer of power , should Democrats win .
Harris urged voters “ Please vote .
Vote early , ” where as Pence noted that the Democrats have “ spent the last three and a half years trying to overturn the results of the last election.
” Harris ’ performance was so dire that the leftist media immediately played the ‘ sexism ’ card : Some @ @ @ @ @ @

Kamala Harris put in a terrible performance at last night’s Vice Presidential debate, often appearing robotic and repeating memorised “facts” that blatantly contradicted things Joe Biden had said in last week’s debate.
Harris also appeared lost and confounded whenever Mike Pence interrupted her to point out such inconsistencies, as if she had been thrown off course from reading a script.
A prime example off this occurred when Harris claimed that Biden is not going to raise taxes, to which Pence pointed out that last week Biden himself promised to repeal Trump’s tax cuts.
Mike Pence just MURDERED Kamala Harris so brutally that she literally went silent and was speechless. pic.twitter.com/BmDrQ0kVM1 — Kelb Hull (@CalebJHull) October 8, 2020
Pence then eloquently explained the Trump administration’s comprehensive tax plans:
On Coronavirus, Harris declared that “frankly this administration has forfeited their right to re-election because of this,” but then outlined the Biden-Harris plan, which Pence pointed out is pretty much exactly the same as the Trump administration’s, adding the zinger “It looks a little like plagiarism, which Joe Biden knows a little something about.”
Mike Pence defends the White House’s handling of the Covid-19 pandemic at the #VPDebate. Looking at the Biden plan to handle the pandemic, "it looks a little bit like plagiarism," he says. https://t.co/OfcmYZ763K pic.twitter.com/NDN48q5uZW — Bloomberg (@business) October 8, 2020
Pence also noted that when Trump prevented flights from China in January, Biden labeled it “xenophobic.”
When Pence framed the debate by saying the American people have bravely fought against the virus, Harris got riled and snapped:
Pence tore Obamacare apart, leaving Harris defenseless:
On the climate, Pence declared that The Green New Deal, sponsored by Harris, “would crush” American energy, while noting that “The US has reduced CO2 more than the countries that are in The Paris Accord.”
When Harris noted that Biden will not ban fracking, Pence pointed out that “Both of you repeatedly committed to banning fossil fuel and banning fracking.”
VP Pence laughs when Kamala Harris says that Joe Biden will not ban fracking pic.twitter.com/hlpxtruXrR — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) October 8, 2020
VP Pence at #VPDebate: "Look, Senator Harris, you are entitled to your own opinion, but you're not entitled to your own facts. You said on multiple occasions when you were running for president that you would ban fracking." https://t.co/rJxLDwoEis #VPDebate pic.twitter.com/jySwEW1HnK — ABC News (@ABC) October 8, 2020
President Trump took to Twitter to note the inconsistency:
Joe Biden and Kamala Harris BOTH want to BAN FRACKING. pic.twitter.com/FpcvoVXcKH — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 8, 2020
When the debate turned to China, Harris accused Trump of losing the trade war with China, to which Pence shot back “You said Trump lost a trade war with China, Joe Biden never fought one.”
The Vice President also labelled Biden “a cheerleader for communist China.”
🇺🇸 — VP DEBATE — Vice President Mike Pence to Kamala Harris: “Lost the trade war with China? Joe Biden never fought it”#VPDebate pic.twitter.com/5B9YdJxe1m — Belaaz (@TheBelaaz) October 8, 2020
When the debate turned to the Supreme Court, Pence asked if Democrats would pack the court, a question which Harris first attempted to avoid, then eventually had to address:
Harris claimed that “Trump packed the district courts with white people!” prompting Pence to explain what the straight answer to his question is:
Donald Trump Jr chimed in on Twitter, explaining why Harris avoided the question:
Of course Kamala Harris will not answer the question about packing the court because that’s what they plan on doing. When the Democrats can’t get their way they will change the rules to push their leftist agenda.
They’re not even pretending anymore. — Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) October 8, 2020
The final zinger came when the debate turned to the topic of transfer of power, should Democrats win. Harris urged voters “Please vote. Vote early,” where as Pence noted that the Democrats have “spent the last three and a half years trying to overturn the results of the last election.”
PENCE: "When you talk about accepting the outcome of the election, I must tell you, Senator, your party has spent the last three and a half years trying to overturn the results of the last election." pic.twitter.com/zrquOgjKz4 — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) October 8, 2020
Mike Pence is doing GREAT! She is a gaffe machine. — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 8, 2020
Harris’ performance was so dire that the leftist media immediately played the ‘sexism’ card:
Van Jones calls Mike Pence the "mansplainer in chief." pic.twitter.com/vkjfiiNGqL — Thomas Catenacci (@ThomasCatenacci) October 8, 2020
Pence's mansplaining, interrupting, condescending and general smarminess is at an 11 tonight. No wonder suburban women have left the Republican Party in droves.#Debates2020 — S.E. Cupp (@secupp) October 8, 2020
When you have to listen to mansplaining #VPDebate pic.twitter.com/8knHowx489 — Loni Love (@LoniLove) October 8, 2020
So how do y’all think this mansplaining, rule-breaking, interrupting, patronizing performance by Pence plays with women voters? #VPDebate — Ron Fournier (@ron_fournier) October 8, 2020
Men literally can't even debate women *in a formal debate* without it being labeled "mansplaining" https://t.co/6HiQzSWtG4 — Lauren Chen (@TheLaurenChen) October 8, 2020
Some were not buying it though:
George Stephanopoulos mansplained alleged mansplaining at the debate to his female colleagues, it seems pic.twitter.com/94x3BVIAzW — Elizabeth Harrington (@LizRNC) October 8, 2020
The same women who say they want equality are the first ones to complain about mansplaining or cry sexism. #Equality — Lisa Boothe (@LisaMarieBoothe) October 8, 2020
I can’t wait for Amy Coney Barrett hearings when interrupting a female nominee will no longer be mansplaining and sexist. — Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) October 8, 2020


thelibertydaily--2020-10-09--Trump Campaign Releases List of 24 Lies by Fast Kamala During Debate

Among numerous false statements by Kamala Harris in the vice presidential debate Wednesday was the oft-repeated and easily refuted `` Charlottesville lie '' that Joe Biden says was the catalyst for his decision to run for president .
But there were many more , including the Democratic senator 's claim that she and Biden do n't want to ban fracking , that they wo n't raise taxes on the middle class , that the president said the coronavirus is a hoax , that Trump wo n't protect people with pre-existing conditions and that Abraham Lincoln 's handling of a Supreme @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on Amy Coney Barrett .
The Trump-Pence campaign released a list of what it said were `` 24 false or misleading claims '' made at the debate .
Harris claimed regarding the 2017 clash in Charlottesville over a Robert E. Lee monument that Trump called neo-Nazis and other white supremacists `` fine people . ''
TRENDING : Schumer plays COVID card in bid to stop Amy Coney Barrett confirmation : 'The GOP must halt' At Charlottesville , she said , `` people were peacefully protesting the need for racial justice where a young @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other side , there were neo-Nazis carrying tiki torches , shouting racial epithets , antisemitic slurs . ''
`` And Donald Trump , when asked about it , said there were fine people on both sides , '' said Harris .
Pence directed his reply to media who have perpetuated the false claim as well as to Harris .
`` You know , I think this is one of the things that makes people dislike the media so much in this country .
That you selectively edit , just like Sen. Harris did @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and others on our side of the aisle make , '' the vice president said .
`` Sen. Harris conveniently omitted after the president made comments about people on either side of the debate over monuments , he condemned the KKK , neo-Nazis , and white supremacists , and has done so repeatedly . ''
In one of many occasions in which he repeated the lie , Biden said during his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention that Trump 's words in 2017 were `` a wake-up call for us as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` a call to action . ''
`` At that moment , I knew I 'd have to run , '' he said .
In fact , during his remarks on Charlottesville , Trump immediately made it clear he was not talking about `` the neo-Nazis and white nationalists , '' explicitly declaring `` they should be condemned totally . ''
His reference – as a CNN contributor pointed out in a rebuke to his network colleagues – was to the people on both sides of the issue of whether or not to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other Confederate figures .
'You 're not entitled to your own facts' On fracking , Pence pointed out that during the primary elections , both she and Biden said they would ban fracking .
Harris said during a townhall there 's `` no question I 'm in favor of banning fracking ... and there has to be legislation . ''
She it 's `` something I ’ ve taken on in California '' and she has a `` history of working on this issue . ''
Pence said Wednesday : `` Look , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your own opinion , but you 're not entitled to your own facts .
You yourself said on multiple occasions when you were running for president that you would ban fracking . ''
Harris was fending off a question about whether she and Biden would pack the court when she switched to the dispute over Republicans moving to confirm Amy Coney Barrett on the eve of the election .
She said `` Honest Abe '' Lincoln , when he was running for re-election in 1864 and a Supreme Court vacancy arose , chose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a nominee to the Senate .
But Lincoln waited until December 1864 only because the Senate had not been in session in October .
On taxes , Harris insisted Biden `` has been very clear '' that he `` will not raise taxes on anybody who makes less than $ 400,000 a year . ''
Pence retorted : `` Joe Biden said twice in the debate last week that he 's going to repeal the Trump tax cuts .
That was tax cuts that gave the average working family to a thousand dollars @ @ @ @ @ @ @ . ''
Biden , in fact , has said he would repeal the Trump tax cuts on his first day of office .
Trump , in fact , said it was the Democrats ' `` politicizing '' of the pandemic , blaming it on him , that was `` a hoax . '
`` Now the Democrats are politicizing the coronavirus .
You know that , right ?
Coronavirus .
They 're politicizing it .
They tried the impeachment hoax ... and this is their new hoax , '' the president said .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump said that `` hoax '' is `` referring to the action that they take to try and pin this on somebody , because we 've done such a good job . ''
`` The hoax is on them , not — I 'm not talking about what 's happening here .
I ’ m talking what they ’ re doing .
That ’ s the hoax . ''
Harris claimed Trump `` is in court right now trying to get rid of the Affordable Care Act , which means that you will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ . ''
The Trump campaign points out that this month Trump signed an executive order ensuring pre-existing conditions will be protected .
And he 's made protecting `` all pre-existing conditions '' a key point in his second-term agenda .
Further , the Obamacare repeal-and-replace bills backed by Republicans in Congress included protections for Americans with pre-existing conditions .
`` If Obamacare is struck down , President Trump has promised to pass and support a replacement that includes pre-existing condition protections , '' the campaign said .

Among numerous false statements by Kamala Harris in the vice presidential debate Wednesday was the oft-repeated and easily refuted "Charlottesville lie" that Joe Biden says was the catalyst for his decision to run for president.
But there were many more, including the Democratic senator's claim that she and Biden don't want to ban fracking, that they won't raise taxes on the middle class, that the president said the coronavirus is a hoax, that Trump won't protect people with pre-existing conditions and that Abraham Lincoln's handling of a Supreme Court vacancy supports the Democrats' stance on Amy Coney Barrett.
The Trump-Pence campaign released a list of what it said were "24 false or misleading claims" made at the debate.
Harris claimed regarding the 2017 clash in Charlottesville over a Robert E. Lee monument that Trump called neo-Nazis and other white supremacists "fine people."
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
At Charlottesville, she said, "people were peacefully protesting the need for racial justice where a young woman was killed, and on the other side, there were neo-Nazis carrying tiki torches, shouting racial epithets, antisemitic slurs."
"And Donald Trump, when asked about it, said there were fine people on both sides," said Harris.
Pence directed his reply to media who have perpetuated the false claim as well as to Harris.
"You know, I think this is one of the things that makes people dislike the media so much in this country. That you selectively edit, just like Sen. Harris did, comments that President Trump and I and others on our side of the aisle make," the vice president said. "Sen. Harris conveniently omitted after the president made comments about people on either side of the debate over monuments, he condemned the KKK, neo-Nazis, and white supremacists, and has done so repeatedly."
Did Kamala Harris give many false statements during the VP debate? Yes No Completing this poll entitles you to WND news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use You're logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out. 100% (321 Votes) 0% (1 Votes)
In one of many occasions in which he repeated the lie, Biden said during his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention that Trump's words in 2017 were "a wake-up call for us as a country" and, for him, "a call to action."
"At that moment, I knew I'd have to run," he said.
In fact, during his remarks on Charlottesville, Trump immediately made it clear he was not talking about "the neo-Nazis and white nationalists," explicitly declaring "they should be condemned totally."
His reference – as a CNN contributor pointed out in a rebuke to his network colleagues – was to the people on both sides of the issue of whether or not to maintain statues of Robert E. Lee and other Confederate figures.
'You're not entitled to your own facts'
On fracking, Pence pointed out that during the primary elections, both she and Biden said they would ban fracking.
Harris said during a townhall there's "no question I'm in favor of banning fracking ... and there has to be legislation." She it's "something I’ve taken on in California" and she has a "history of working on this issue."
Pence said Wednesday: "Look, Sen. Harris, you're entitled to your own opinion, but you're not entitled to your own facts. You yourself said on multiple occasions when you were running for president that you would ban fracking."
Harris was fending off a question about whether she and Biden would pack the court when she switched to the dispute over Republicans moving to confirm Amy Coney Barrett on the eve of the election.
She said "Honest Abe" Lincoln, when he was running for re-election in 1864 and a Supreme Court vacancy arose, chose to wait until the election to send a nominee to the Senate.
But Lincoln waited until December 1864 only because the Senate had not been in session in October.
On taxes, Harris insisted Biden "has been very clear" that he "will not raise taxes on anybody who makes less than $400,000 a year."
Pence retorted: "Joe Biden said twice in the debate last week that he's going to repeal the Trump tax cuts. That was tax cuts that gave the average working family to a thousand dollars in a tax break every single year."
Biden, in fact, has said he would repeal the Trump tax cuts on his first day of office.
Harris falsely claimed that Trump called the coronavirus pandemic "a hoax."
Trump, in fact, said it was the Democrats' "politicizing" of the pandemic, blaming it on him, that was "a hoax.'
"Now the Democrats are politicizing the coronavirus. You know that, right? Coronavirus. They're politicizing it. They tried the impeachment hoax ... and this is their new hoax," the president said.
Similar to his clarification regarding Charlottesville, Trump said that "hoax" is "referring to the action that they take to try and pin this on somebody, because we've done such a good job."
"The hoax is on them, not — I'm not talking about what's happening here. I’m talking what they’re doing. That’s the hoax."
Harris claimed Trump "is in court right now trying to get rid of the Affordable Care Act, which means that you will lose protections if you have pre-existing conditions."
The Trump campaign points out that this month Trump signed an executive order ensuring pre-existing conditions will be protected.
And he's made protecting "all pre-existing conditions" a key point in his second-term agenda.
Further, the Obamacare repeal-and-replace bills backed by Republicans in Congress included protections for Americans with pre-existing conditions.
"If Obamacare is struck down, President Trump has promised to pass and support a replacement that includes pre-existing condition protections," the campaign said.


thelibertydaily--2020-10-09--Slow Joe and Fast Kamala are Lying . . . To Fellow Democrats

Would Joe Biden and Kamala Harris ban fracking .
That depends on who they ’ re talking to at the time .
If they ’ re talking to radical leftists , fracking is evil and a Biden-Harris administration will “ push it out , ” as Biden once claimed .
If they ’ re talking to a moderate audience or to a national audience , they claim to be unambiguously opposed to a ban on fracking .
In fact , there ’ s nothing but ambiguity in the Biden-Harris plan for fracking , and that should concern every American who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democrats or the Sunrise Movement .
But fracking isn ’ t their only problem .
Ask them about packing the courts .
If you think you ’ ll get a yes-or-no answer , keep dreaming .
They absolutely refuse to state a policy on it because they know that either answer will make them lose favor from one wing or the other in their party .
It ’ s a stark difference from what President Trump has done since before his election .
Regardless of the audience , he has stayed consistent with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ policy , he ’ ll announce it .
If asked about it , he ’ ll answer .
That , arguably more than anything else , is what differentiates his style from that of his opponents .
In the latest episode of NOQ Report , JD dives into the dilemma the Democratic Party faces as they juggle between appealing to the passionate radicals in their party and pandering to the moderate middle .
It ’ s a problem President Trump doesn ’ t have .
It ’ s also a problem that would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the President lose his reelection bid .
Imagine having to change your answer based on who you ’ re talking to at any given moment .
That ’ s the problem the Democratic Party faces , a problem that will spill over to the rest of the nation should they be allowed to gain more power .
COVID-19 may take down an independent news outlet Nobody said running a media site would be easy .
We could use some help keeping this site afloat .
Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the journalistic side of running a news outlet .
Paying the bills has never been my forte , but we ’ ve survived .
We have ads on the site that help , but since the site ’ s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn ’ t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it .
When I left a nice , corporate career in 2017 , I did so knowing I wouldn ’ t make nearly as much money .
But what we do at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth .
We know we ’ ll never make a ton of money this way , and we ’ re okay with that .
Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns .
Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically .
We thought we could weather the storm , but the so-called “ surge ” or “ 2nd-wave ” that mainstream @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our prospects in jeopardy .
In short , we are now in desperate need of financial assistance .
The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate .
Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly .
Alternatively , you can donate through PayPal as well .
We need approximately $ 11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020 , but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated .
The second way to help is to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills , it didn ’ t seem necessary .
Now , we ’ re struggling to pay the bills .
This shouldn ’ t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically .
June , 2018 , we had 11,678 visitors .
A year later in June , 2019 , we were up to 116,194 .
In June , 2020 , we had 614,192 .
We ’ re heading in the right direction @ @ @ @ @ @ @ talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “ get in on the action ” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth .
Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above .
Election year or not , coronavirus lockdowns or not , anarchic riots or not , the need for truthful journalism endures .
But in these times , we need as many conservative media voices as possible .
Please help keep NOQ Report going .
Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast .
Join @ @ @ @ @ @ @ movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
The coronavirus crisis has prompted many , even some conservatives , to promote authoritarianism .
It ’ s understandable to some extent now , but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life .
We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
Would Joe Biden and Kamala Harris ban fracking. That depends on who they’re talking to at the time. If they’re talking to radical leftists, fracking is evil and a Biden-Harris administration will “push it out,” as Biden once claimed. If they’re talking to a moderate audience or to a national audience, they claim to be unambiguously opposed to a ban on fracking. In fact, there’s nothing but ambiguity in the Biden-Harris plan for fracking, and that should concern every American who doesn’t contribute to the Justice Democrats or the Sunrise Movement.
But fracking isn’t their only problem. Ask them about packing the courts. If you think you’ll get a yes-or-no answer, keep dreaming. They absolutely refuse to state a policy on it because they know that either answer will make them lose favor from one wing or the other in their party. It’s a stark difference from what President Trump has done since before his election. Regardless of the audience, he has stayed consistent with his messaging. If he has a policy, he’ll announce it. If asked about it, he’ll answer. That, arguably more than anything else, is what differentiates his style from that of his opponents.
In the latest episode of NOQ Report, JD dives into the dilemma the Democratic Party faces as they juggle between appealing to the passionate radicals in their party and pandering to the moderate middle. It’s a problem President Trump doesn’t have. It’s also a problem that would cause tremendous turmoil in this nation should the President lose his reelection bid.
Imagine having to change your answer based on who you’re talking to at any given moment. That’s the problem the Democratic Party faces, a problem that will spill over to the rest of the nation should they be allowed to gain more power.
COVID-19 may take down an independent news outlet
Nobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.
Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it.
When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that.
Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance.
The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated.
The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above.
Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.
This America First, veteran-owned company is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout. Don’t wait for beef to become more scarce. Stock up on freeze-dried cubes made from Ribeyes, NY Strips, and Premium Cuts.is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout.
Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast.
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]