thelibertydaily--2020-06-04--Democrat L.A. Mayor Eric Garcetti to Cut $150 Million from Police; ‘Reinvest’ in ‘Communities of Col

Democrat L.A. Mayor Eric Garcetti to Cut $150 Million from Police; ‘Reinvest’ in ‘Communities of Color’

LOS ANGELES , California — Mayor Eric Garcetti announced Wednesday evening that the City of Los Angeles would cut up to $ 150 million from the Los Angeles Police Department ( LAPD ) and “ reinvest ” the funds in the local black community .
“ This is bigger than just a budget , but I want you to know we will not be increasing our police budget — how can we at this moment ?
” Garcetti asked .
Instead , Garcetti said , he had worked with the city council and community leaders to reach an agreement “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and communities of color ; in those places left behind.
” He recounted statistics demonstrating racial inequality , and concluded : “ I have instructed and committed … that our city … identify $ 250 million in cuts , so we could invest in jobs , in health , in education , and in healing .
And that those dollars need to be focused on our black community here in Los Angeles , as well as communities of color , and women , and people who have been left behind , for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to every department , including the police , he said .
“ We all have to step up and say : What can we sacrifice ?
” Racial justice , he said , was “ worth sacrificing for.
” Eileen Decker , president of the Los Angeles Police Commission , spoke during Garcetti ’ s presentation , and estimated the cuts to policing at $ 100 million to $ 150 million .
In his speech , Garcetti also implicitly criticized President Donald Trump , saying that leaders in Washington wanted “ to go @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , to get tough , ‘ to dominate , ’ to not worry about people ’ s heads , to dehumanize them as you put them into squad cars.
” He concluded : “ This not only does not save lives , it costs lives.
” In contrast , Garcetti , praised and thanked former President Barack Obama for his advocacy for police reform , referring to Obama ’ s speech to his My Brother ’ s Keeper organization earlier in the day .
Garcetti referred to the killing of George Floyd by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ week , as a “ modern-day lynching , ” as he had on Tuesday .
He spoke as protests moved through downtown Los Angeles , largely peacefully , though traffic was disrupted and many businesses remained boarded up after the looting and rioting that took place over the weekend .
Protests targeted District Attorney Jackie Lacey , and signs included “ DEFUND LAPD ” and “ COPS R NOT ESSENTIAL.
” The city ’ s curfew , which had been 6:00 p.m. for the past two days , was moved to 9:00 p.m @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Beach , in Orange County , where a driver drove through a group of protesters .
There were no injuries , and the driver was later arrested .
In San Bernardino , an earthquake measuring 5.5 on the Richter scale was felt .
Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m .
ET ( 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT ) .
His new book , RED NOVEMBER , is available for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship .
Follow him on Twitter at @ joelpollak .

LOS ANGELES, California — Mayor Eric Garcetti announced Wednesday evening that the City of Los Angeles would cut up to $150 million from the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) and “reinvest” the funds in the local black community.
“This is bigger than just a budget, but I want you to know we will not be increasing our police budget — how can we at this moment?” Garcetti asked.
Instead, Garcetti said, he had worked with the city council and community leaders to reach an agreement “to commit to reinvesting in black communities, and communities of color; in those places left behind.”
He recounted statistics demonstrating racial inequality, and concluded: “I have instructed and committed … that our city … identify $250 million in cuts, so we could invest in jobs, in health, in education, and in healing. And that those dollars need to be focused on our black community here in Los Angeles, as well as communities of color, and women, and people who have been left behind, for too long.”
That would require cuts to every department, including the police, he said.
“We all have to step up and say: What can we sacrifice?”
Racial justice, he said, was “worth sacrificing for.”
Eileen Decker, president of the Los Angeles Police Commission, spoke during Garcetti’s presentation, and estimated the cuts to policing at $100 million to $150 million.
In his speech, Garcetti also implicitly criticized President Donald Trump, saying that leaders in Washington wanted “to go back to 20th or 19th century policing, to get tough, ‘to dominate,’ to not worry about people’s heads, to dehumanize them as you put them into squad cars.”
He concluded: “This not only does not save lives, it costs lives.”
In contrast, Garcetti, praised and thanked former President Barack Obama for his advocacy for police reform, referring to Obama’s speech to his My Brother’s Keeper organization earlier in the day.
Garcetti referred to the killing of George Floyd by police in Minneapolis, Minnesota, last week, as a “modern-day lynching,” as he had on Tuesday.
He spoke as protests moved through downtown Los Angeles, largely peacefully, though traffic was disrupted and many businesses remained boarded up after the looting and rioting that took place over the weekend.
Protests targeted District Attorney Jackie Lacey, and signs included “DEFUND LAPD” and “COPS R NOT ESSENTIAL.”
The city’s curfew, which had been 6:00 p.m. for the past two days, was moved to 9:00 p.m.
There was some drama in Newport Beach, in Orange County, where a driver drove through a group of protesters. There were no injuries, and the driver was later arrested.
In San Bernardino, an earthquake measuring 5.5 on the Richter scale was felt.
Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET (4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT). His new book, RED NOVEMBER, is available for pre-order. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.


thelibertydaily--2020-06-04--Lawless Democrats in Minneapolis Seriously Consider Disbanding Their Police Force

Several members of the Minneapolis City Council are reportedly seriously considering “ disbanding ” the city ’ s police department after the death of George Floyd , who died in police custody in the Minnesota city last week , spurring riots to break out there and all over the nation .
“ I don ’ t know yet , though several of us on the council are working on finding out , what it would take to disband the [ Minneapolis Police Department ] and start fresh with a community-oriented , non-violent public safety and outreach capacity , ” tweeted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ represents Ward 3 in Minneapolis .
MORE NEWS : Woke liberal attacks women for using their ‘ white privilege ’ to clean Black Lives Matter graffiti off federal building Fletcher went on to argue that Minneapolis ’ police force is “ irredeemably beyond reform ” and that the city needs a new type of public safety that does not “ fear our residents ” and doesn ’ t “ murder black men.
” “ The whole world is watching , and we can declare policing as we know it a thing of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cunningham , another member of the city council , retweeted Fletcher ’ s comments , according to City Pages .
Council member Alondra Cano voiced her agreement by tweeting that the Minneapolis Police Department is “ not reformable ” and that “ change is coming.
” This comes days after the city council unanimously approved a Minnesota Department of Human Rights investigation into their police department , saying at the time : “ We urge the state to use its full weight to hold the Minneapolis Police Department accountable for any and all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ community and stand ready to aid in this process as full partners .
The City Council ’ s oversight of the Minneapolis Police Department has been historically constrained by the City Charter and state law and we welcome new tools to pursue transformational , structural changes to how the City provides for public safety.
” Floyd ’ s death was an undeniable tragedy , and while some changes in the police force are necessary , disbanding it entirely is an absolutely ridiculous idea .
Every city needs a police force , and doing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only cause more violence and chaos , which may in the end be exactly what Democrats want .

Several members of the Minneapolis City Council are reportedly seriously considering “disbanding” the city’s police department after the death of George Floyd, who died in police custody in the Minnesota city last week, spurring riots to break out there and all over the nation.
“I don’t know yet, though several of us on the council are working on finding out, what it would take to disband the [Minneapolis Police Department] and start fresh with a community-oriented, non-violent public safety and outreach capacity,” tweeted Steve Fletcher, a council member who represents Ward 3 in Minneapolis.
I don’t know yet, though several of us on the council are working on finding out, what it would take to disband the MPD and start fresh with a community-oriented, non-violent public safety and outreach capacity. — Steve Fletcher – Minneapolis Ward 3 (@MplsWard3) June 2, 2020
Fletcher went on to argue that Minneapolis’ police force is “irredeemably beyond reform” and that the city needs a new type of public safety that does not “fear our residents” and doesn’t “murder black men.”
“The whole world is watching, and we can declare policing as we know it a thing of the past,” he wrote. Phillipe Cunningham, another member of the city council, retweeted Fletcher’s comments, according to City Pages. Council member Alondra Cano voiced her agreement by tweeting that the Minneapolis Police Department is “not reformable” and that “change is coming.”
The Mpls Police Department is not reformable. Change is coming.#Justice4George — Alondra Cano (@AloCanoMN) June 3, 2020
This comes days after the city council unanimously approved a Minnesota Department of Human Rights investigation into their police department, saying at the time:
“We urge the state to use its full weight to hold the Minneapolis Police Department accountable for any and all abuses of power and harms to our community and stand ready to aid in this process as full partners. The City Council’s oversight of the Minneapolis Police Department has been historically constrained by the City Charter and state law and we welcome new tools to pursue transformational, structural changes to how the City provides for public safety.”
Floyd’s death was an undeniable tragedy, and while some changes in the police force are necessary, disbanding it entirely is an absolutely ridiculous idea. Every city needs a police force, and doing away with it in any way would only cause more violence and chaos, which may in the end be exactly what Democrats want.


thelibertydaily--2020-06-05--Democrat-Ruled New York and California Freed Thousands of Criminals and the Riots Began

Daniel Greenfield , a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center , is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism .
New York City released over 2,650 criminals from prison to protect them from the pandemic .
But they didn ’ t stay home or wash their hands .
They went back to their old jobs and 100 of them accounted for 190 arrests for crimes like burglary and robbery .
A rapist was released and he went back to raping .
One of the freed criminals was responsible for 18 burglaries at closed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the end of bail meant that he was set loose .
This looting was going on long before the riots .
Now as the rioters and looters rule the streets of Manhattan , when the police manage to arrest them , they have to quickly let them go .
`` When it comes to a burglary , a commercial store , which is looting , they ’ re back out , '' Chief Terrence Monahan said .
`` Because of bail reform , you ’ re back out on the street the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ held on any sort of bail . ''
Of the 650 thugs arrested , almost all will be released back on the street to riot and loot again .
Los Angeles County released about 5,000 criminals accounting for around a third of imprisoned criminals .
And with no bail , arrested criminals were set loose and then arrested again .
In the first 30 days of the experiment , 213 criminals were rearrested again after being put back on the street .
Sacramento County ’ s jail population fell 30 % , Orange @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 45 % , Detroit ’ s jail population dropped by 40 % , Philadelphia ’ s by 17 % , and Denver ’ s by 41 % .
Massachusetts freed 1,000 criminals while Illinois freed around 4,000 .
Dallas released 1,000 criminals and Hennepin County , the home of the riots that went on to sweep major cities , reduced its prison population by 44 % .
What impact did the hundreds of released criminals have on kickstarting the riots ?
It ’ s no coincidence that some of the areas hardest hit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also opened up their prisons to protect inmates from contracting the coronavirus .
Despite apocalyptic predictions from policymakers and the media , there were no mass deaths in prisons or ICE detention facilities .
But the critical mass of criminals out on the street left police in major cities hopelessly outnumbered .
That was all part of the plan .
While not all the criminals returned to their trade , even those who wanted to go straight had few jobs waiting for them in locked down cities and states that were already suffering @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that might have employed them had been shut down .
Not all of the released criminals returned to crime , but the riots provided the perfect opportunity .
Even before the pandemic , state and federal pro-crime legislation pushed by lefties and libertarians had dramatically cut the numbers of criminals being safely held behind bars .
New York City 's prison population had dropped from over 25,000 in 2016 to just under 20,000 in 2019 .
The end of bail meant that criminals never even bothering showing up for trial .
And Mayor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to come to court with free movie tickets and gift cards .
Even before the riots , there had been violent mob attacks on NYPD officers .
The attacks have just reached a critical mass in the Black Lives Matter riots .
Anyone who was closely reading the crime numbers could have predicted the mass looting outbreak .
With massive numbers of criminals on the loose , major crimes rose 12 % .
Car thefts shot up 65 % , robberies went up by 25 % , and burglaries rose by 22 % @ @ @ @ @ @ @ City had shot up 75 % by April .
This was slow-motion looting .
If you understand that then what happened in Manhattan with organized gangs targeting stores , smashing and grabbing their way through countless businesses , falls into place .
The mass looting was not a shocking new development , it was just the existing criminals going public .
The Black Lives Matter riots provided cover for Antifa violence and for organized criminal gangs and individual opportunistic looters , many of whom had been released because of leftist activism .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ safely locked away .
By 2017 , the state was down to 115,000 criminals , in part due to an unconstitutional Supreme Court decision ordering the state to release tens of thousands of criminals into the street .
Statewide crime rates slowly began ticking up .
Crime rates jumped in 2012 , after the Supreme Court 's unconstitutional ruling , and in 2015 , after George Soros ' Proposition 47 : Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act .
The name meant the exact opposite of what it actually did , effectively legalizing retail theft @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
After each mass jailbreak , crime went up .
Violent crimes shot up from 151,425 before Proposition 47 , to 178,553 in 2017 .
Property crime rates were where the real action was , not only rising , but defying nationwide downward trends .
While the rioters cry for more pro-crime measures , demanding the defunding of the police , less prosecution , and more criminals freed from prison , that ’ s exactly what caused the riots .
New York and California aren ’ t being devastated because of mass public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ criminals who are tearing New York City and Los Angeles apart .
And they want the rest of the country to follow them down the same rabbit hole until there isn ’ t a single safe place left in America .
The mass riots and looting are the direct result of freeing thousands of criminals while crippling law enforcement and the justice system .
Past upticks in crime rates had been hidden with statistical games and by tainting the system from the bottom up , by defining crime reporting down at the precinct @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to bring charges against criminals or pleading them down to next to nothing .
Even as people felt less safe , the media and the authorities kept telling them that crime was falling .
The riots tore apart that lie .
No one feels safe after watching mobs ransack neighborhoods and assault police .
But the media and the authorities have replaced that lie with another lie , falsely portraying the riots as a mass uprising against racism , when they ’ re really a plot by a small group of radicals and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doing much of the work of actually wrecking the cities .
Black Lives Matter and Antifa have touched off the riots and looting to overwhelm police forces .
And it ’ s working .
Demoralized cops are given a bad choice between arresting motivated rioters or chasing down looters , while knowing that everyone they arrest will out by the next day so that it really doesn ’ t matter .
The riot endgame will move the war to the next stage with more mass releases of criminals , more crippled police forces @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the next wave of riots will be even worse .
There will be another viral video , more manufactured outrage , and even more devastating riots .
Each set of riots will include demands that if met will lead to worse riots in the next stage of the conflict .
This is the same old playbook that the Left has used effectively for well over a century .
The myth of law enforcement racism is being used to dismantle police forces and open up the prisons .
The released criminals become witting or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tear apart society and build up the political power of the radicals who can turn the violence on or off .
There is only one way forward .
Conservatives must work to reverse the pro-crime policies of leftists and libertarians .
As the nation experiences curfews and people huddle in their homes , there is no way to escape the truth that if we don ’ t lock up the criminals rampaging in the street , we will be the ones in jail .
Right now , Black Lives Matter and Antifa , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democrat Party to the media to academia , are holding a gun to the head of the United States of America .
But the worst part of it is that we gave them the gun and put the bullets in it when we began freeing criminals .
Law and order is the only way to take the gun away .
Locking up the criminals disarms the Left .

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.
New York City released over 2,650 criminals from prison to protect them from the pandemic. But they didn’t stay home or wash their hands. They went back to their old jobs and 100 of them accounted for 190 arrests for crimes like burglary and robbery. A rapist was released and he went back to raping.
One of the freed criminals was responsible for 18 burglaries at closed eateries. And when he was arrested, the end of bail meant that he was set loose. This looting was going on long before the riots.
Now as the rioters and looters rule the streets of Manhattan, when the police manage to arrest them, they have to quickly let them go.
“When it comes to a burglary, a commercial store, which is looting, they’re back out,” Chief Terrence Monahan said. “Because of bail reform, you’re back out on the street the next day. You cannot be held on any sort of bail.”
Of the 650 thugs arrested, almost all will be released back on the street to riot and loot again.
Los Angeles County released about 5,000 criminals accounting for around a third of imprisoned criminals. And with no bail, arrested criminals were set loose and then arrested again. In the first 30 days of the experiment, 213 criminals were rearrested again after being put back on the street.
Sacramento County’s jail population fell 30%, Orange County’s prison numbers dropped by 45%, Detroit’s jail population dropped by 40%, Philadelphia’s by 17%, and Denver’s by 41%. Massachusetts freed 1,000 criminals while Illinois freed around 4,000. Dallas released 1,000 criminals and Hennepin County, the home of the riots that went on to sweep major cities, reduced its prison population by 44%.
What impact did the hundreds of released criminals have on kickstarting the riots?
It’s no coincidence that some of the areas hardest hit by the rioting and the looting had also opened up their prisons to protect inmates from contracting the coronavirus. Despite apocalyptic predictions from policymakers and the media, there were no mass deaths in prisons or ICE detention facilities. But the critical mass of criminals out on the street left police in major cities hopelessly outnumbered.
That was all part of the plan.
While not all the criminals returned to their trade, even those who wanted to go straight had few jobs waiting for them in locked down cities and states that were already suffering from massive unemployment and where the businesses that might have employed them had been shut down.
Not all of the released criminals returned to crime, but the riots provided the perfect opportunity.
Even before the pandemic, state and federal pro-crime legislation pushed by lefties and libertarians had dramatically cut the numbers of criminals being safely held behind bars. New York City’s prison population had dropped from over 25,000 in 2016 to just under 20,000 in 2019. The end of bail meant that criminals never even bothering showing up for trial. And Mayor Bill de Blasio tried to bribe them to come to court with free movie tickets and gift cards. Even before the riots, there had been violent mob attacks on NYPD officers. The attacks have just reached a critical mass in the Black Lives Matter riots.
Anyone who was closely reading the crime numbers could have predicted the mass looting outbreak.
With massive numbers of criminals on the loose, major crimes rose 12%. Car thefts shot up 65%, robberies went up by 25%, and burglaries rose by 22%.
Burglaries of businesses in New York City had shot up 75% by April.
This was slow-motion looting. If you understand that then what happened in Manhattan with organized gangs targeting stores, smashing and grabbing their way through countless businesses, falls into place. The mass looting was not a shocking new development, it was just the existing criminals going public.
The Black Lives Matter riots provided cover for Antifa violence and for organized criminal gangs and individual opportunistic looters, many of whom had been released because of leftist activism.
Free the criminals. Organize riots. Watch cities burn.
In 2006, California had over 165,000 criminals safely locked away. By 2017, the state was down to 115,000 criminals, in part due to an unconstitutional Supreme Court decision ordering the state to release tens of thousands of criminals into the street. Statewide crime rates slowly began ticking up.
Crime rates jumped in 2012, after the Supreme Court’s unconstitutional ruling, and in 2015, after George Soros’ Proposition 47: Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act. The name meant the exact opposite of what it actually did, effectively legalizing retail theft. The more discreet version of looting.
After each mass jailbreak, crime went up.
Violent crimes shot up from 151,425 before Proposition 47, to 178,553 in 2017. Property crime rates were where the real action was, not only rising, but defying nationwide downward trends.
While the rioters cry for more pro-crime measures, demanding the defunding of the police, less prosecution, and more criminals freed from prison, that’s exactly what caused the riots.
New York and California aren’t being devastated because of mass public outrage, but because they freed the criminals who are tearing New York City and Los Angeles apart. And they want the rest of the country to follow them down the same rabbit hole until there isn’t a single safe place left in America.
The mass riots and looting are the direct result of freeing thousands of criminals while crippling law enforcement and the justice system. Past upticks in crime rates had been hidden with statistical games and by tainting the system from the bottom up, by defining crime reporting down at the precinct level, to the top, refusing to bring charges against criminals or pleading them down to next to nothing.
Even as people felt less safe, the media and the authorities kept telling them that crime was falling.
The riots tore apart that lie. No one feels safe after watching mobs ransack neighborhoods and assault police. But the media and the authorities have replaced that lie with another lie, falsely portraying the riots as a mass uprising against racism, when they’re really a plot by a small group of radicals and racists, while freed career criminals are doing much of the work of actually wrecking the cities.
Black Lives Matter and Antifa have touched off the riots and looting to overwhelm police forces. And it’s working. Demoralized cops are given a bad choice between arresting motivated rioters or chasing down looters, while knowing that everyone they arrest will out by the next day so that it really doesn’t matter.
The riot endgame will move the war to the next stage with more mass releases of criminals, more crippled police forces, and even less prosecutions. And the next wave of riots will be even worse. There will be another viral video, more manufactured outrage, and even more devastating riots. Each set of riots will include demands that if met will lead to worse riots in the next stage of the conflict.
This is the same old playbook that the Left has used effectively for well over a century.
The myth of law enforcement racism is being used to dismantle police forces and open up the prisons. The released criminals become witting or unwitting shock troops for violent confrontations that tear apart society and build up the political power of the radicals who can turn the violence on or off.
There is only one way forward. Conservatives must work to reverse the pro-crime policies of leftists and libertarians. As the nation experiences curfews and people huddle in their homes, there is no way to escape the truth that if we don’t lock up the criminals rampaging in the street, we will be the ones in jail.
Right now, Black Lives Matter and Antifa, and more importantly their backers from the Democrat Party to the media to academia, are holding a gun to the head of the United States of America. But the worst part of it is that we gave them the gun and put the bullets in it when we began freeing criminals.
Law and order is the only way to take the gun away. Locking up the criminals disarms the Left.


thelibertydaily--2020-06-05--OUTRAGEOUS BIG TECH ELECTION MEDDLING: Twitter Removes President Trump’s Incredible Video Tribute To

OUTRAGEOUS BIG TECH ELECTION MEDDLING: Twitter Removes President Trump’s Incredible Video Tribute To George Floyd [WHERE IS THE FEC?!]

This afternoon , Twitter removed a video tribute to George Floyd posted by President Trump ’ s reelection campaign , claiming it was in violation of copyrighted material .
The Hill – The Team Trump account tweeted out a nearly four-minute-long video that is narrated by a speech the president gave a few days after Floyd died in Minneapolis police custody .
Donald Trump Jr. called out Twitter for censoring his father ’ s amazing video tribute to George Floyd from the campaign “ Team Trump ” Twitter account : In the video , the president can be heard lamenting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s death over images of Floyd and peaceful protesters mourning his death .
Later in the video , the president warns about “ violence and anarchy ” from “ radical leftwing groups ” over images of riots and looting .
He also describes the vast majority of law enforcement officials as “ devoted public servants ” as the video shows images of police officers hugging civilians and people cleaning up graffiti and garbage in the streets .
The Team Trump video was retweeted by Trump and his son , Donald Trump Jr. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that said : “ This media has been disabled in response to a report by the copyright owner .
”

This afternoon, Twitter removed a video tribute to George Floyd posted by President Trump’s reelection campaign, claiming it was in violation of copyrighted material.
The Hill – The Team Trump account tweeted out a nearly four-minute-long video that is narrated by a speech the president gave a few days after Floyd died in Minneapolis police custody.
Donald Trump Jr. called out Twitter for censoring his father’s amazing video tribute to George Floyd from the campaign “Team Trump” Twitter account:
Twitter and @Jack are censoring this uplifting and unifying message from President Trump after the #GeorgeFloyd tragedy. The same speech the media refused to cover. Here is the YouTube link. WATCH AND MAKE IT GO VIRAL: https://t.co/7V72z7JiKm https://t.co/xBgkc1bvPm — Team Trump (Text TRUMP to 88022) (@TeamTrump) June 4, 2020
Watch the amazing video here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0P40rSPTRKI&feature=youtu.be
In the video, the president can be heard lamenting the “grave tragedy” of Floyd’s death over images of Floyd and peaceful protesters mourning his death.
Advertisement


thelibertydaily--2020-06-05--SPECIAL PRICE: Let the World Know What the W.H.O. REALLY Stands For — “WUHAN HOAX ORGANIZATION” –Get

SPECIAL PRICE: Let the World Know What the W.H.O. REALLY Stands For — “WUHAN HOAX ORGANIZATION” –Get Our Shirt!

Tired of the World Health Organization acting as the propaganda arm of the Chinese communist party ?
Let the world @ @ @ @ @ hoax .
Look closely and you 'll find some gems .

Every piece of our merchandise is made with your values in mind. And a patriotic spirit lives within ALL of our customers, so wear your patriotism proudly.


thelibertydaily--2020-06-05--2014 Flashback: New York Times Says Pedophilia Is ‘Not a Crime’

Yes , I also had to make sure it wasn ’ t a fake headline .
The New York Times really did publish an article titled , “ Pedophilia : A Disorder , Not a Crime.
” In the 2014 op-ed piece , it ’ s argued that 1 percent of the male population find themselves sexually attracted to prepubescent children .
So , if there are 159,410,000 males in the United States , that would mean there are approximately 1,594,100 male pedophiles throughout the nation .
The piece argues that there are harmful misconceptions when it comes to pedophilia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ distinction should be made between child molestation as an act and pedophilia as a status .
“ One can live with pedophilia , ” the author says , “ and not act on it.
” Another apparent misconception is that pedophilia is a choice .
Baby , they were ‘ born that way.
’ The ‘ disorder ’ , the author says , may have neurological origins , because for instance , “ Men with pedophilia are three times more likely to be left-handed or ambidextrous , a finding that strongly suggests a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ solution is always to end the stigma associated with pedophilia based on these “ misconceptions , ” and allow them to safely come forward and seek treatment to help manage urges and avoid committing crimes .
However , the author laments the fact that when it comes to public policies that might help pedophiles find treatment , the law omits pedophiles from protection .
The article says : “ The Americans With Disabilities Acts of 1990 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits discrimination against otherwise qualified individuals with mental @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , education and medical care .
Congress , however , explicitly excluded pedophilia from protection under these two crucial laws.
” For the author , “ it ’ s time to revisit these categorical exclusions .
Without legal protection , a pedophile can not risk seeking treatment or disclosing his status to anyone for support .
He could lose his job , and future job prospects , if he is seen at a group-therapy session , asks for a reasonable accommodation to take medication or see a psychiatrist , or requests a limit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Isolating individuals from appropriate employment and treatment only increases their risk of committing a crime , ” the piece claimed .
The rationale here is that children are being sexually assaulted because the stigma associated with pedophilia prevents pedophiles from seeking help .
Therefore , it ’ s suggested that we put an end to the stigma by either viewing pedophilia as a disorder , or as others have argued , a sexual orientation .
But it ’ s hard to overstate the implications of defining pedophilia in such terms , as Alex @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ Sexual orientation ’ is increasingly becoming a legally protected category .
In many parts , it ’ s prohibited to discriminate on the basis of ‘ sexual orientation ’ .
So , what would that mean for schools , daycares , or children ’ s hospitals when a person with a ‘ sexual orientation ’ toward pedophilia applies for a job ?
What we ’ re witnessing in our culture is the sidelining of God and the downward spiral of “ rationalised ” debauchery that follows .
With the Bible effectively rendered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” deemed an outdated concept , organisations , academics and teachers are feeling emboldened to operate outside the restraints of an objective moral standard , where absurdity reigns supreme .

Yes, I also had to make sure it wasn’t a fake headline. The New York Times really did publish an article titled, “Pedophilia: A Disorder, Not a Crime.”
In the 2014 op-ed piece, it’s argued that 1 percent of the male population find themselves sexually attracted to prepubescent children. So, if there are 159,410,000 males in the United States, that would mean there are approximately 1,594,100 male pedophiles throughout the nation.
The piece argues that there are harmful misconceptions when it comes to pedophilia. According to the author, a distinction should be made between child molestation as an act and pedophilia as a status. “One can live with pedophilia,” the author says, “and not act on it.”
Another apparent misconception is that pedophilia is a choice. Baby, they were ‘born that way.’ The ‘disorder’, the author says, may have neurological origins, because for instance, “Men with pedophilia are three times more likely to be left-handed or ambidextrous, a finding that strongly suggests a neurological cause.”
Of course, the solution is always to end the stigma associated with pedophilia based on these “misconceptions,” and allow them to safely come forward and seek treatment to help manage urges and avoid committing crimes.
However, the author laments the fact that when it comes to public policies that might help pedophiles find treatment, the law omits pedophiles from protection.
The article says: “The Americans With Disabilities Acts of 1990 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits discrimination against otherwise qualified individuals with mental disabilities, in areas such as employment, education and medical care. Congress, however, explicitly excluded pedophilia from protection under these two crucial laws.”
For the author, “it’s time to revisit these categorical exclusions. Without legal protection, a pedophile cannot risk seeking treatment or disclosing his status to anyone for support. He could lose his job, and future job prospects, if he is seen at a group-therapy session, asks for a reasonable accommodation to take medication or see a psychiatrist, or requests a limit in his interaction with children.
Advertisement
“Isolating individuals from appropriate employment and treatment only increases their risk of committing a crime,” the piece claimed.
The rationale here is that children are being sexually assaulted because the stigma associated with pedophilia prevents pedophiles from seeking help. Therefore, it’s suggested that we put an end to the stigma by either viewing pedophilia as a disorder, or as others have argued, a sexual orientation.
But it’s hard to overstate the implications of defining pedophilia in such terms, as Alex Newman of the Freedom Project noted.
Advertisement
‘Sexual orientation’ is increasingly becoming a legally protected category. In many parts, it’s prohibited to discriminate on the basis of ‘sexual orientation’. So, what would that mean for schools, daycares, or children’s hospitals when a person with a ‘sexual orientation’ toward pedophilia applies for a job?
What we’re witnessing in our culture is the sidelining of God and the downward spiral of “rationalised” debauchery that follows. With the Bible effectively rendered irrelevant in society, and “sin” deemed an outdated concept, organisations, academics and teachers are feeling emboldened to operate outside the restraints of an objective moral standard, where absurdity reigns supreme.


thelibertydaily--2020-06-05--Candace Owens Video: I DO NOT Support George Floyd and I Refuse to See Him as a Martyr

Floyd 's family deserves justice , but turning him into a saint is a destructive mistake .
[ Candace Owens ' BLEXIT movement aims to uplift and empower minorities to realize the American Dream .
Sign up to receive updates and explore ways to get involved : BLEXIT.COM . ]
In this explosive new video , Candace Owens explains why she does not support George Floyd and refuses to see him as a secular saint .
She makes it clear that it is obviously wrong how Floyd was killed by the police and that she hopes that Officer Derek Chauvin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as she hopes Floyd 's family gets the justice they deserve through Chauvin 's punishment .
Above all , Candace issues a robust and stirring warning to her fellow black Americans about the grave mistake of turning Floyd into a shining martyr .
In her profound remarks , Candace dares to break numerous taboos and tell piercing truths that the leftist guardians of acceptable opinion don ’ t want told .
Candace ’ s bold stance in these contentious times distinguishes her as one of the most courageous truth-tellers -- and freedom fighters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her for that .
Do n't miss this powerful video .

[Candace Owens’ BLEXIT movement aims to uplift and empower minorities to realize the American Dream. Sign up to receive updates and explore ways to get involved: BLEXIT.COM.]
In this explosive new video, Candace Owens explains why she does not support George Floyd and refuses to see him as a secular saint. She takes this stand while making it clear that it is obviously wrong how Floyd was killed by the police and that she hopes that Officer Derek Chauvin gets the justice he deserves — just as she hopes Floyd’s family gets the justice they deserve through Chauvin’s punishment.
Above all, Candace issues a robust and stirring warning to her fellow black Americans about the grave mistake of turning Floyd into a shining martyr. In her profound remarks, Candace dares to break numerous taboos and tell piercing truths that the leftist guardians of acceptable opinion don’t want told.
Candace’s bold stance in these contentious times distinguishes her as one of the most courageous truth-tellers — and freedom fighters — of our time. Frontpage commends her for that.


thelibertydaily--2020-06-06--Mike Lindell Donates MyPillows to National Guard Members Sleeping on the Floor in Twin Cities

Mike Lindell , the outspoken CEO of Minnesota-based MyPillow , is back in the news after a donation of his @ @ @ @ @ Minnesota National Guard who were sleeping on the floor as they helped protect locations in @ @ @ @ @ In a tweet Wednesday , Lindell announced the donation and showed some of the guardsmen @ @ @ @ @ unpacking and testing out out the products .
“ MyPillow donated @ MyPillowUSA ’ s @ @ @ @ @ at the State Capitol in St. Paul , Minnesota where they ’ ve been sleeping @ @ @ @ @ Lindell tweeted .

Western Journal reported:
Mike Lindell, the outspoken CEO of Minnesota-based MyPillow, is back in the news after a donation of his wares to members of the Minnesota National Guard who were sleeping on the floor as they helped protect locations in the Twin Cities area.
In a tweet Wednesday, Lindell announced the donation and showed some of the guardsmen and women and MyPillow employees unpacking and testing out out the products.
“MyPillow donated @MyPillowUSA’s to the @NationalGuard here at the State Capitol in St. Paul, Minnesota where they’ve been sleeping on the floor,” Lindell tweeted.


thelibertydaily--2020-06-06--Crooked Hillary Asks Appeals Court to Help Her Dodge Judicial Watch Deposition on Emails and Benghaz

Crooked Hillary Asks Appeals Court to Help Her Dodge Judicial Watch Deposition on Emails and Benghazi

A three-judge appeals court panel heard arguments this week from Hillary Clinton ’ s lawyer and Judicial Watch as the former secretary of state seeks to avoid a deposition about her private email server and the Benghazi attack talking points .
Judicial Watch , a conservative watchdog group , argued Tuesday that the depositions of Clinton and Clinton 's former chief of staff , Cheryl Mills , ordered by a D.C. district court judge was necessary to understand whether Clinton attempted to avoid the Freedom of Information Act when she improperly used a private server to conduct her State Department @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for all her emails .
“ It is certainly within the authority of the district court to hear from the agency head herself about whether there was intent , '' said Judicial Watch attorney Ramona Cotca .
Clinton wanted to “ short-circuit this process by using the most potent weapon in the judicial arsenal to prevent the district court from ever being able to reach a determination of whether there was ever an adequate search , '' Cotca said .
The FBI investigated Clinton 's use of the server , hosted in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ New York , while she was secretary of state from 2009 to 2013 .
Although former FBI Director James Comey found Clinton was “ extremely careless ” in handling classified emails , no criminal charges were recommended against anyone following the bureau ’ s `` Midyear Exam '' investigation .
Clinton deleted 33,000 supposedly non-work-related emails .
“ Why is it that four years after the FBI closed its investigation that there are still additional Clinton emails that are being produced .
Why were they not searched or produced or located earlier ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Even today , the State Department does not know what is the universe of Clinton emails from the State Department — that is the significant issue here . ''
The Judicial Watch lawyer said deposing Clinton would help determine if she had tried to `` thwart FOIA . ''
Clinton ’ s legal team asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to issue a writ of mandamus , a corrective order which would instruct the lower court to change its ruling ordering Clinton and Mills to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Lamberth said in March , `` It is time to hear directly from Secretary Clinton . ''
“ We intervened in the case — Secretary Clinton did — when it became clear that her deposition might be an issue , ” said David Kendall , Clinton 's attorney , who was also appearing for Mills .
Two of the three judges on the panel — Obama appointee Nina Pillard and George W. Bush appointee Thomas Griffith — stressed that issuing a writ of mandamus would be an extreme move .
Pillard also claimed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ leaky vessel ” during the State Department ’ s search for Clinton 's emails appeared “ unfounded . ''
Judge Robert Wilkins , another Obama appointee on the panel , asked : “ Why wouldn ’ t it be relevant to depose Secretary Clinton or Ms. Mills to clarify who may have corresponded with either of them or in general about the Benghazi talking points ? ''
Kendall contended that the only relevant question was : “ Are there any more documents to produce ?
” The Clinton lawyer claimed that “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` is harassment . ''
A State Department review of email practices of dozens of former agency officials and aides to Clinton found “ some instances ” of classified information being “ inappropriately introduced into an unclassified system.
” But investigators uncovered “ no persuasive evidence of systematic , deliberate mishandling of classified information.
” Mark Freeman , the Justice Department attorney representing the State Department , said the Trump administration didn ’ t support Clinton ’ s petition for mandamus .
“ The State Department ’ s approach to all of these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has just been to get through them — to respond to the FOIA requests , to push through any district court litigation , and to bring all these cases , and indeed the entire chapter , to a close , ” Freeman said , adding , `` We have not asked this court to issue the extraordinary remedy of mandamus , and we have not supported the petition at issue here.
” The virtual hearing stretched over an hour and a half .
The appeals court will likely issue an opinion on whether @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to avoid the deposition in the next few weeks .
Judicial Watch also wants to question Clinton and Mills about the talking points for former United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice 's appearances on television shows following the terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi .
Members of Ansar al Sharia launched a coordinated assault on Sept. 11 , 2012 , killing U.S .
Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens , foreign service officer Sean Smith , and CIA contractors Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty .
Clinton , Rice , and others incorrectly blamed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Some of the Tuesday arguments were reminiscent of the debate over the Justice Department ’ s move to drop charges against retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn .
Instead of immediately agreeing with that decision , D.C. District Court Judge Emmett Sullivan appointed an outside amicus , after which the Flynn legal team pursued a writ of mandamus with the D.C. appeals court in an effort to force Sullivan to allow the case to be dismissed .
DOJ lawyers weighed in in favor of mandamus in that case .
Cheryl Mills 's attorney , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that case .
Wilkins is on the three-member panel that will decide whether to grant mandamus .

A three-judge appeals court panel heard arguments this week from Hillary Clinton’s lawyer and Judicial Watch as the former secretary of state seeks to avoid a deposition about her private email server and the Benghazi attack talking points.
Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group, argued Tuesday that the depositions of Clinton and Clinton's former chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, ordered by a D.C. district court judge was necessary to understand whether Clinton attempted to avoid the Freedom of Information Act when she improperly used a private server to conduct her State Department business and whether the agency adequately searched for all her emails.
“It is certainly within the authority of the district court to hear from the agency head herself about whether there was intent," said Judicial Watch attorney Ramona Cotca.
Clinton wanted to “short-circuit this process by using the most potent weapon in the judicial arsenal to prevent the district court from ever being able to reach a determination of whether there was ever an adequate search," Cotca said.
The FBI investigated Clinton's use of the server, hosted in the basement of her home in Chappaqua, New York, while she was secretary of state from 2009 to 2013. Although former FBI Director James Comey found Clinton was “extremely careless” in handling classified emails, no criminal charges were recommended against anyone following the bureau’s "Midyear Exam" investigation. Clinton deleted 33,000 supposedly non-work-related emails.
“Why is it that four years after the FBI closed its investigation that there are still additional Clinton emails that are being produced. Why were they not searched or produced or located earlier?” Cotca asked, later adding, “Even today, the State Department does not know what is the universe of Clinton emails from the State Department — that is the significant issue here."
The Judicial Watch lawyer said deposing Clinton would help determine if she had tried to "thwart FOIA."
Clinton’s legal team asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to issue a writ of mandamus, a corrective order which would instruct the lower court to change its ruling ordering Clinton and Mills to be deposed. U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth said in March, "It is time to hear directly from Secretary Clinton."
“We intervened in the case — Secretary Clinton did — when it became clear that her deposition might be an issue,” said David Kendall, Clinton's attorney, who was also appearing for Mills.
Two of the three judges on the panel — Obama appointee Nina Pillard and George W. Bush appointee Thomas Griffith — stressed that issuing a writ of mandamus would be an extreme move. Pillard also claimed that Judicial Watch's concern about a “leaky vessel” during the State Department’s search for Clinton's emails appeared “unfounded."
Judge Robert Wilkins, another Obama appointee on the panel, asked: “Why wouldn’t it be relevant to depose Secretary Clinton or Ms. Mills to clarify who may have corresponded with either of them or in general about the Benghazi talking points?"
Kendall contended that the only relevant question was: “Are there any more documents to produce?”
The Clinton lawyer claimed that “the real purpose" of the depositions "is harassment."
A State Department review of email practices of dozens of former agency officials and aides to Clinton found “some instances” of classified information being “inappropriately introduced into an unclassified system.” But investigators uncovered “no persuasive evidence of systematic, deliberate mishandling of classified information.”
Mark Freeman, the Justice Department attorney representing the State Department, said the Trump administration didn’t support Clinton’s petition for mandamus.
“The State Department’s approach to all of these [Clinton] cases from the beginning has just been to get through them — to respond to the FOIA requests, to push through any district court litigation, and to bring all these cases, and indeed the entire chapter, to a close,” Freeman said, adding, "We have not asked this court to issue the extraordinary remedy of mandamus, and we have not supported the petition at issue here.”
The virtual hearing stretched over an hour and a half. The appeals court will likely issue an opinion on whether they will be granting Clinton's request to avoid the deposition in the next few weeks.
Judicial Watch also wants to question Clinton and Mills about the talking points for former United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice's appearances on television shows following the terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi. Members of Ansar al Sharia launched a coordinated assault on Sept. 11, 2012, killing U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens, foreign service officer Sean Smith, and CIA contractors Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty. Clinton, Rice, and others incorrectly blamed the attack on a YouTube video.
Some of the Tuesday arguments were reminiscent of the debate over the Justice Department’s move to drop charges against retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn. Instead of immediately agreeing with that decision, D.C. District Court Judge Emmett Sullivan appointed an outside amicus, after which the Flynn legal team pursued a writ of mandamus with the D.C. appeals court in an effort to force Sullivan to allow the case to be dismissed. DOJ lawyers weighed in in favor of mandamus in that case.
Cheryl Mills's attorney, Beth Wilkinson, is representing Sullivan in that case. Wilkins is on the three-member panel that will decide whether to grant mandamus.


thelibertydaily--2020-06-06--Fake News Media Lies About President Trump to Smear Him About George Floyd, Jobs Report

This is crazy .
A bunch of members of the media are running with a straight out lie about comments @ @ @ @ @ the entire video .
There ’ s absolutely nothing wrong with what Trump said , @ @ @ @ @ context that is appropriate to his comment about George Floyd .
But the media is @ @ @ @ @ Pathetic .
I guess they had do something BIG to attack Trump on a day @ @ @ @ @ news about job growth after covid obliterated the economy…

This is crazy. A bunch of members of the media are running with a straight out lie about comments Trump made today.
Trump is bad enough on his own, but it's unbelievable how dishonest members of the press are on this site. I had my DM's being filled with people outraged at Trump for saying George Floyd would be cheering on the jobs numbers. I was about to attack him. Then saw the full video. — (((AG))) (@AGHamilton29) June 5, 2020
Trump was talking about the need for "equal justice under the law" and how "we can't let that happen" referring to injustice. That was the context of his George Floyd comments that countless people intentionally cut out on this site.https://t.co/M2FkGKSnPR — (((AG))) (@AGHamilton29) June 5, 2020
Trump was literally saying that Floyd would be happy that we are moving towards fixing injustices, and a bunch of people intentionally cut out the part beforehand AND after to suggest he was talking about the jobs report. How does anyone justify that type of dishonesty? — (((AG))) (@AGHamilton29) June 5, 2020
Watch the entire video. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with what Trump said, and it is in the context that is appropriate to his comment about George Floyd. But the media is completely lying about it:
Almost every reporter on this site misled there readers/followers. I mean @GabbyOrr_ simply made a claim that clearly wasn't true from the vide. How is that acceptable? pic.twitter.com/DIefdh277u — (((AG))) (@AGHamilton29) June 5, 2020
Look at this, over 5K RT’s where this CBS correspondent intentionally cut out the part beforehand and after to deceive people about the context. This should at least be worthy of a suspension at a news organization with any standards. https://t.co/dC3YQldK05 https://t.co/O6yq97ze9F — (((AG))) (@AGHamilton29) June 5, 2020
Appears @kaitlancollins also decided to dishonestly mislead her audience into thinking that comment was about job numbers. Unfortunately, @jaketapper chose to spread that false claim. pic.twitter.com/H7vLOZJ6EF — (((AG))) (@AGHamilton29) June 5, 2020
And now you have countless news sites spreading this falsehood… Do members of the press really not realize how much this stuff kills their credibility? pic.twitter.com/wlKobZe2nb — (((AG))) (@AGHamilton29) June 5, 2020
Pathetic. I guess they had do something BIG to attack Trump on a day where we had great great news about job growth after covid obliterated the economy…


thelibertydaily--2020-06-06--Democrat Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot Tells Residents Not to Use Guns to Defend Themselves from Viol

Democrat Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot Tells Residents Not to Use Guns to Defend Themselves from Violent Communist Rioters

Democrats and liberals are getting WOKE alright – about the Second Amendment !
There ’ s a loooot of people out there saying that they see the need to defend themselves when society begins to break down .
And yet , this moron continues to press the liberal gun control line : Here ’ s what she said : “ Obviously we ’ re aware of the fact that Illinois is a concealed carry state , and that many people have weapons at their disposal in their homes and their businesses , ” Lightfoot responded .
“ Do not take @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the police.
” ARE YOU FRIGGIN SERIOUS ?
?
!
!
Not only are Chicago residents in the worst parts of that town regularly murdered at higher rates than in the rest of the country , but there ’ s a FRIGGIN nationwide RIOT going on !
!
“ Do not pick up arms and try to be the police .
If there ’ s a problem , call 911 .
We will respond , ” Lightfoot said before adding , “ I urge people to show strength and do not take matters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when it comes to their actual personal safety and that of their families , most Americans are bright enough to know that they need to defend themselves and not depend on any government , federal , state or local…

Democrats and liberals are getting WOKE alright – about the Second Amendment! There’s a loooot of people out there saying that they see the need to defend themselves when society begins to break down. And yet, this moron continues to press the liberal gun control line:
Here’s what she said:
“Obviously we’re aware of the fact that Illinois is a concealed carry state, and that many people have weapons at their disposal in their homes and their businesses,” Lightfoot responded. “Do not take matters into your own hands. Call the police.”
ARE YOU FRIGGIN SERIOUS??!! Not only are Chicago residents in the worst parts of that town regularly murdered at higher rates than in the rest of the country, but there’s a FRIGGIN nationwide RIOT going on!!
Unbelievable:
“Do not pick up arms and try to be the police. If there’s a problem, call 911. We will respond,” Lightfoot said before adding, “I urge people to show strength and do not take matters into your own hands.”
Thankfully, when it comes to their actual personal safety and that of their families, most Americans are bright enough to know that they need to defend themselves and not depend on any government, federal, state or local…


thelibertydaily--2020-06-06--Soy Boy Justin Trudeau Takes a Knee at Black Lives Matter Protest in Canada – Same Guy Caught in Bla

Soy Boy Justin Trudeau Takes a Knee at Black Lives Matter Protest in Canada – Same Guy Caught in Blackface at Party

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau knelt on the ground as part of a crowd gathered on Parliament Hill Friday afternoon @ @ @ @ @ demonstrators protesting police killings of Black people .
TRENDING : EXCLUSIVE : Amazon Is Censoring @ @ @ @ @ Hoft 's Latest Book `` In God We Trust : Not in Lying Liberal Lunatics @ @ @ @ @ Just Removed Censorship !
The Toronto Star posted video in September 2019 of Justin Trudeau @ @ @ @ @ paint on his arms , hands and knees .

What a disgrace.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau knelt on the ground as part of a crowd gathered on Parliament Hill Friday afternoon, in solidarity with anti-racism demonstrators protesting police killings of Black people.
Justin Trudeau kneels during anti-racism protest in Ottawa. Amazing. https://t.co/Ei2uTBkW8d — George Takei (@GeorgeTakei) June 5, 2020
The Toronto Star posted video in September 2019 of Justin Trudeau in blackface and black skin paint on his arms, hands and knees.


thelibertydaily--2020-06-06--New York Appeals Court Orders Molotov Cocktail Lawyers and Domestic Terrorists Back to Jail

Attorneys Colinford Mattis and Urooj Rahman were arrested for tossing Molotov cocktails at a police vehicle .
Colinford Mattis works as a Corporate Associate at Pryor Cashman LLP | He ’ s a Problem Solver by Nature and a Lawyer by Training .
Two high-powered lawyers , including an Ivy League corporate attorney were charged on Sunday with hurling Molotov cocktails into a police vehicle during the New York leftist riots this weekend .
Colinford Mattis , 32 , a lawyer and member of Community Board 5 in East New York , was charged along with fellow attorney Urooj Rahman @ @ @ @ @ @ @ police cruiser parked outside the 88th Precinct station house in Fort Greene .
“ This is shocking news to me , ” Andre Mitchell , president of Community Board 5 told the Daily News .
“ The allegation does surprise me because that doesn ’ t sound like him.
” The super of Rahman ’ s building called her “ an angel ” who recently lost her legal job .
I can ’ t believe it .
I ’ m stunned , ” said George Raleigh , the super of Rahman ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ kid ?
She ’ s an angel.
” TRENDING : EXCLUSIVE : Amazon Is Censoring The Gateway Pundit Writer Joe Hoft 's Latest Book `` In God We Trust : Not in Lying Liberal Lunatics '' ... UPDATE : Amazon Just Removed Censorship !
UPDATE — Here is the Photo of the two driving before their attack .
On Friday the two Brooklyn-based lawyers facing federal charges for allegedly throwing Molotov cocktails into a NYPD cruiser during the riots are back in federal custody after an appeals court reversed the bail decision .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ terrorists were ordered back to jail .
They are a danger to the public .

Attorneys Colinford Mattis and Urooj Rahman were arrested for tossing Molotov cocktails at a police vehicle.
Colinford Mattis works as a Corporate Associate at Pryor Cashman LLP | He’s a Problem Solver by Nature and a Lawyer by Training.
The Daily News reported:
Two high-powered lawyers, including an Ivy League corporate attorney were charged on Sunday with hurling Molotov cocktails into a police vehicle during the New York leftist riots this weekend.
Colinford Mattis, 32, a lawyer and member of Community Board 5 in East New York, was charged along with fellow attorney Urooj Rahman with the attempted attack on an empty police cruiser parked outside the 88th Precinct station house in Fort Greene.
“This is shocking news to me,” Andre Mitchell, president of Community Board 5 told the Daily News. “The allegation does surprise me because that doesn’t sound like him.”
The super of Rahman’s building called her “an angel” who recently lost her legal job.
I can’t believe it. I’m stunned,” said George Raleigh, the super of Rahman’s building in Bay Ridge. “This kid? She’s an angel.”


thelibertydaily--2020-06-06--Unanimous 7-0 Decision! Michigan Supreme Court Unanimously Sides with 77-Year-Old Barber Over Democr

Unanimous 7-0 Decision! Michigan Supreme Court Unanimously Sides with 77-Year-Old Barber Over Democrat Despot Gretchen Witchmer

In a unanimous 7-0 decision , the Michigan Supreme Court sided with 77-year-old barber Karl Manke over Gov .
Gretchen Whitmer on Friday .
Whitmer and Attorney General Dana Nessel have been relentlessly pursuing Manke , attempting to force the closure of his shop during the coronavirus pandemic .
Great Lakes News reported on Facebook late Friday that the Court ruled unanimously in favor of the Owosso barber — a stunning decision , given the narrow 4-3 ideological split in favor of conservatives .
According to Great Lakes News , Manke ’ s attorney , David Kallman , called it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of his career.
” Whitmer and Nessel fined Manke and stripped him of his license after he repeatedly refused to close his business in defiance of Whitmer ’ s executive orders .
A Michigan Court of Appeals upheld that Manke ’ s license suspension was valid , but the Supreme Court decision reversed that .
Manke was defiant after the Appeals Court ruling and told WILX , “ I ’ m still open , still working until they cut my hands off.
” Breitbart News caught up with Manke during the recent “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the response during the protest and the support for his stand was “ overwhelming , ” and called himself “ a Michigan small town barber that just wants to work.
” “ This is an oppressive move on this governor ’ s part , ” Manke said , observing that it “ reflects almost a police state.
” “ I refuse to stand down on this , ” he said .
“ I wasn ’ t this rock star three weeks ago , ” Manke told Breitbart News , but Whitmer made him @ @ @ @ @ @ @ development .
“ I ’ m still standing up .
I still have that courage , ” Manke said .
Manke ’ s full speech at the protest was aired on The Kyle Olson Show : Kyle Olson is a reporter for Breitbart News .
He is also host of “ The Kyle Olson Show , ” syndicated on Michigan radio stations on Saturdays .
Listen to segments on YouTube .
Follow him on Twitter and like him on Facebook .

In a unanimous 7-0 decision, the Michigan Supreme Court sided with 77-year-old barber Karl Manke over Gov. Gretchen Whitmer on Friday.
Whitmer and Attorney General Dana Nessel have been relentlessly pursuing Manke, attempting to force the closure of his shop during the coronavirus pandemic.
Great Lakes News reported on Facebook late Friday that the Court ruled unanimously in favor of the Owosso barber — a stunning decision, given the narrow 4-3 ideological split in favor of conservatives.
According to Great Lakes News, Manke’s attorney, David Kallman, called it the “biggest, most lopsided victory of his career.”
Whitmer and Nessel fined Manke and stripped him of his license after he repeatedly refused to close his business in defiance of Whitmer’s executive orders.
A Michigan Court of Appeals upheld that Manke’s license suspension was valid, but the Supreme Court decision reversed that.
Manke was defiant after the Appeals Court ruling and told WILX, “I’m still open, still working until they cut my hands off.”
Breitbart News caught up with Manke during the recent “Operation Haircut” protest.
He said the response during the protest and the support for his stand was “overwhelming,” and called himself “a Michigan small town barber that just wants to work.”
“This is an oppressive move on this governor’s part,” Manke said, observing that it “reflects almost a police state.”
“I refuse to stand down on this,” he said.
“I wasn’t this rock star three weeks ago,” Manke told Breitbart News, but Whitmer made him one.
He thanked God for the development.
“I’m still standing up. I still have that courage,” Manke said.
Manke’s full speech at the protest was aired on The Kyle Olson Show:
Kyle Olson is a reporter for Breitbart News. He is also host of “The Kyle Olson Show,” syndicated on Michigan radio stations on Saturdays. Listen to segments on YouTube. Follow him on Twitter and like him on Facebook.


thelibertydaily--2020-06-06--Trump Derangement Syndrome: The Lancet’s Hydroxychloroquine Retraction is One of the Biggest Retract

Trump Derangement Syndrome: The Lancet’s Hydroxychloroquine Retraction is One of the Biggest Retractions in Modern History

he Lancet is one of the oldest and most respected medical journals in the world .
Recently , they published an article on Covid patients receiving hydroxychloroquine with a dire conclusion : the drug increases heartbeat irregularities and decreases hospital survival rates .
This result was treated as authoritative , and major drug trials were immediately halted – because why treat anyone with an unsafe drug ?
Now , that Lancet study has been retracted , withdrawn from the literature entirely , at the request of three of its authors who “ can no longer vouch for the veracity of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the seriousness of the topic and the consequences of the paper , this is one of the most consequential retractions in modern history .
It is natural to ask how this is possible .
How did a paper of such consequence get discarded like a used tissue by some of its authors only days after publication ?
If the authors don ’ t trust it now , how did it get published in the first place ?
The answer is quite simple .
It happened because peer review , the formal process of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for publication , is not designed to detect anomalous data .
It makes no difference if the anomalies are due to inaccuracies , miscalculations , or outright fraud .
This is not what peer review is for .
While it is the internationally recognised badge of “ settled science ” , its value is far more complicated .
At its best , peer review is a slow and careful evaluation of new research by appropriate experts .
It involves multiple rounds of revision that removes errors , strengthens analyses , and noticeably improves @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is merely window dressing that gives the unwarranted appearance of authority , a cursory process which confers no real value , enforces orthodoxy , and overlooks both obvious analytical problems and outright fraud entirely .
Regardless of how any individual paper is reviewed – and the experience is usually somewhere between the above extremes – the sad truth is peer review in its entirety is struggling , and retractions like this drag its flaws into an incredibly bright spotlight .
The ballistics of this problem are well known .
To start with , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ internal currency of science consists entirely of producing new papers , which form the cornerstone of your scientific reputation .
There is no emphasis on reviewing the work of others .
If you spend several days in a continuous back-and-forth technical exchange with authors , trying to improve their manuscript , adding new analyses , shoring up conclusions , no one will ever know your name .
Neither are you paid .
Peer review originally fitted under an amorphous idea of academic “ service ” – the tasks that scientists were supposed to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This is a nice idea , but is almost invariably maintained by researchers with excellent job security .
Some senior scientists are notorious for peer reviewing manuscripts rarely or even never – because it interferes with the task of producing more of their own research .
However , even if reliable volunteers for peer review can be found , it is increasingly clear that it is insufficient .
The vast majority of peer-reviewed articles are never checked for any form of analytical consistency , nor can they be – journals do not require @ @ @ @ @ @ @ code and often will not help you obtain them from authors if you wish to see them .
Authors usually have zero formal , moral , or legal requirements to share the data and analytical methods behind their experiments .
Finally , if you locate a problem in a published paper and bring it to either of these parties , often the median response is no response at all – silence .
This is usually not because authors or editors are negligent or uncaring .
Usually , it is because they are trying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of keeping their scientific careers and journals respectively afloat .
Unfortunately , those goals are directly in opposition – authors publishing as much as possible means back-breaking amounts of submissions for journals .
Increasingly time-poor researchers , busy with their own publications , often decline invitations to review .
Subsequently , peer review is then cursory or non-analytical .
And even still , we often muddle through .
Until we encounter extraordinary circumstances .
Peer review during a pandemic faces a brutal dilemma – the moral importance of releasing important information with planetary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of evaluating the presented work fully – while trying to recruit scientists , already busier than usual due to their disrupted lives , to review work for free .
And , after this process is complete , publications face immediate scrutiny by a much larger group of engaged scientific readers than usual , who treat publications which affect the health of every living human being with the scrutiny they deserve .
The consequences are extreme .
The consequences for any of us , on discovering a persistent cough and respiratory difficulties , are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like today ’ s retraction determine how people live or die tomorrow .
They affect what drugs are recommended , what treatments are available , and how we get them sooner .
The immediate solution to this problem of extreme opacity , which allows flawed papers to hide in plain sight , has been advocated for years : require more transparency , mandate more scrutiny .
Prioritise publishing papers which present data and analytical code alongside a manuscript .
Re-analyse papers for their accuracy before publication , instead of just assessing their potential @ @ @ @ @ @ @ necessary , pay them if you must .
Be immediately responsive to criticism , and enforce this same standard on authors .
The alternative is more retractions , more missteps , more wasted time , more loss of public trust … and more death .
• James Heathers is a research scientist at Northeastern University in Boston MA .
He studies biosignal methodology and metascience

The Lancet is one of the oldest and most respected medical journals in the world. Recently, they published an article on Covid patients receiving hydroxychloroquine with a dire conclusion: the drug increases heartbeat irregularities and decreases hospital survival rates. This result was treated as authoritative, and major drug trials were immediately halted – because why treat anyone with an unsafe drug?
Now, that Lancet study has been retracted, withdrawn from the literature entirely, at the request of three of its authors who “can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources”. Given the seriousness of the topic and the consequences of the paper, this is one of the most consequential retractions in modern history.
It is natural to ask how this is possible. How did a paper of such consequence get discarded like a used tissue by some of its authors only days after publication? If the authors don’t trust it now, how did it get published in the first place?
The answer is quite simple. It happened because peer review, the formal process of reviewing scientific work before it is accepted for publication, is not designed to detect anomalous data. It makes no difference if the anomalies are due to inaccuracies, miscalculations, or outright fraud. This is not what peer review is for. While it is the internationally recognised badge of “settled science”, its value is far more complicated.
At its best, peer review is a slow and careful evaluation of new research by appropriate experts. It involves multiple rounds of revision that removes errors, strengthens analyses, and noticeably improves manuscripts.
At its worst, it is merely window dressing that gives the unwarranted appearance of authority, a cursory process which confers no real value, enforces orthodoxy, and overlooks both obvious analytical problems and outright fraud entirely.
Regardless of how any individual paper is reviewed – and the experience is usually somewhere between the above extremes – the sad truth is peer review in its entirety is struggling, and retractions like this drag its flaws into an incredibly bright spotlight.
The ballistics of this problem are well known. To start with, the vast majority of peer review is entirely unrewarded. The internal currency of science consists entirely of producing new papers, which form the cornerstone of your scientific reputation. There is no emphasis on reviewing the work of others. If you spend several days in a continuous back-and-forth technical exchange with authors, trying to improve their manuscript, adding new analyses, shoring up conclusions, no one will ever know your name. Neither are you paid. Peer review originally fitted under an amorphous idea of academic “service” – the tasks that scientists were supposed to perform as members of their community. This is a nice idea, but is almost invariably maintained by researchers with excellent job security. Some senior scientists are notorious for peer reviewing manuscripts rarely or even never – because it interferes with the task of producing more of their own research.
However, even if reliable volunteers for peer review can be found, it is increasingly clear that it is insufficient. The vast majority of peer-reviewed articles are never checked for any form of analytical consistency, nor can they be – journals do not require manuscripts to have accompanying data or analytical code and often will not help you obtain them from authors if you wish to see them. Authors usually have zero formal, moral, or legal requirements to share the data and analytical methods behind their experiments. Finally, if you locate a problem in a published paper and bring it to either of these parties, often the median response is no response at all – silence.
This is usually not because authors or editors are negligent or uncaring. Usually, it is because they are trying to keep up with the component difficulties of keeping their scientific careers and journals respectively afloat. Unfortunately, those goals are directly in opposition – authors publishing as much as possible means back-breaking amounts of submissions for journals. Increasingly time-poor researchers, busy with their own publications, often decline invitations to review. Subsequently, peer review is then cursory or non-analytical.
And even still, we often muddle through. Until we encounter extraordinary circumstances.
Peer review during a pandemic faces a brutal dilemma – the moral importance of releasing important information with planetary consequences quickly, versus the scientific importance of evaluating the presented work fully – while trying to recruit scientists, already busier than usual due to their disrupted lives, to review work for free. And, after this process is complete, publications face immediate scrutiny by a much larger group of engaged scientific readers than usual, who treat publications which affect the health of every living human being with the scrutiny they deserve.
The consequences are extreme. The consequences for any of us, on discovering a persistent cough and respiratory difficulties, are directly determined by this research. Papers like today’s retraction determine how people live or die tomorrow. They affect what drugs are recommended, what treatments are available, and how we get them sooner.
The immediate solution to this problem of extreme opacity, which allows flawed papers to hide in plain sight, has been advocated for years: require more transparency, mandate more scrutiny. Prioritise publishing papers which present data and analytical code alongside a manuscript. Re-analyse papers for their accuracy before publication, instead of just assessing their potential importance. Engage expert statistical reviewers where necessary, pay them if you must. Be immediately responsive to criticism, and enforce this same standard on authors. The alternative is more retractions, more missteps, more wasted time, more loss of public trust … and more death.
James Heathers is a research scientist at Northeastern University in Boston MA. He studies biosignal methodology and metascience.


thelibertydaily--2020-06-06--Drew Brees Becomes Prop Bet, Will He Kneel During Week 1?

Will Drew Brees join the movement he recently denounced and take a knee during the National Anthem ?
?
The @ @ @ @ @ can result in some serious cash ... as the New Orleans Saints QB has become @ @ @ @ @ prop bet .
Of course , Brees started a crap storm when he said he @ @ @ @ @ the anthem ... and later apologized after teammates and the industry 's biggest athletes spoke @ @ @ @ @ TMZ Sports has learned ... MyBookie -- one of the biggest sportsbooks on the internet @ @ @ @ @ on Brees ' stance when Week 1 comes around .
So ... will he kneel @ @ @ @ @ breakdown .
Translation -- Brees standing for the anthem is the HEAVY favorite .
BUT @ @ @ @ @ kneel , it could have a MAJOR payout .
May the odds be ever in @ @ @

Will Drew Brees join the movement he recently denounced and take a knee during the National Anthem??
The right answer to that question can result in some serious cash ... as the New Orleans Saints QB has become the center of a new prop bet.
Of course, Brees started a crap storm when he said he'd NEVER accept kneeling for the anthem ... and later apologized after teammates and the industry's biggest athletes spoke out against his comments.
TMZ Sports has learned ... MyBookie -- one of the biggest sportsbooks on the internet -- has released the odds on Brees' stance when Week 1 comes around.
So ... will he kneel?? Here's the breakdown.
Yes +300
No -700
Translation -- Brees standing for the anthem is the HEAVY favorite. BUT, if he were to kneel, it could have a MAJOR payout.


thelibertydaily--2020-06-06--. . . Also Tucker: The Riots Are About The Left’s Hatred Of Trump And Seizing Power

As you ’ ve watched the far left destroy American cities , have you wondered if this might be at least partially about Trump ?
In fact , he made this the subject of one of his recent monologues .
Tucker Carlson : The riots are not about George Floyd or racial justice .
They ’ re about Trump and seizing power For the past week , all of us have seen chaos engulf our beloved country .
The violence and the destruction have been so overwhelming , so shocking , and awful and vivid on the screen , that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clearly about what ’ s going on .
Most of us haven ’ t been able to step back far enough to ask even the obvious questions .
The most obvious , of course , is what is this really about ?
What do the mobs want ?
Well , thugs looting the Apple Store can ’ t answer that question .
They have no idea .
They just want free iPads .
But what about Apple itself and the rest of corporate America , which is enthusiastically supporting the rioters ?
What @ @ @ @ @ @ @ figures , the celebrities , the tech titans , all of whom are cheering this on .
What do they want out of it ?
Well , they haven ’ t said .
That ’ s the central mystery .
Now suddenly , it is obvious .
It should have been obvious on the first day .
This is about Donald Trump .
Of course , it is .
We just couldn ’ t see it .
For normal people , Donald Trump is the president .
You may like him , you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ way , there will be another president at some point , and we will move on as we always have .
But for Donald Trump ’ s enemies , there is nothing else .
Everything is about Trump .
Everything .
Donald Trump defines their friendships , their careers , their marriages .
Donald Trump affects how they raise their children .
Trump occupies the very center of their lives .
As long as Donald Trump remains in the White House .
They feel powerless and diminished and panicked .
So they can @ @ @ @

As you’ve watched the far left destroy American cities, have you wondered if this might be at least partially about Trump?
Lots of people have, including Tucker Carlson.
In fact, he made this the subject of one of his recent monologues.
Here’s a partial transcript, via FOX News:
Tucker Carlson: The riots are not about George Floyd or racial justice. They’re about Trump and seizing power
For the past week, all of us have seen chaos engulf our beloved country. The violence and the destruction have been so overwhelming, so shocking, and awful and vivid on the screen, that it’s been hard to think clearly about what’s going on.
Most of us haven’t been able to step back far enough to ask even the obvious questions. The most obvious, of course, is what is this really about? What do the mobs want?
Well, thugs looting the Apple Store can’t answer that question. They have no idea. They just want free iPads. But what about Apple itself and the rest of corporate America, which is enthusiastically supporting the rioters? What about members of Congress, the media figures, the celebrities, the tech titans, all of whom are cheering this on. What do they want out of it?
Well, they haven’t said. That’s the central mystery.
Now suddenly, it is obvious. It should have been obvious on the first day. This is about Donald Trump. Of course, it is. We just couldn’t see it.
For normal people, Donald Trump is the president. You may like him, you may not like him, but either way, there will be another president at some point, and we will move on as we always have.
But for Donald Trump’s enemies, there is nothing else. Everything is about Trump. Everything.
Donald Trump defines their friendships, their careers, their marriages. Donald Trump affects how they raise their children. Trump occupies the very center of their lives. As long as Donald Trump remains in the White House. They feel powerless and diminished and panicked. So they cannot be happy.


thelibertydaily--2020-06-06--Iran Further Raises Uranium Stockpiles 8 Times It’s Limit, Blocks Visits to Sites

This article was originally published by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and is reprinted with permission .
The United Nations ’ atomic watchdog said on June 5 that Iran has continued to increase its stockpiles of enriched uranium far beyond the limits set in the 2015 nuclear deal with world powers .
Separately , the International Atomic Energy Agency ( IAEA ) raised “ serious concerns ” over Iran ’ s refusal to let international inspectors investigate possible past nuclear activities at two locations .
The United States pulled out of the accord in May 2018 and reimposed crippling sanctions that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ response , Tehran has been progressively breaking the restrictions laid down in the deal , known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action , or JCPOA , saying that it can reverse them if the remaining parties to the deal — Britain , France , Germany , China and Russia — increase economic incentives .
As of May 20 , Iran ’ s total stockpile of low-enriched uranium amounted to 1,571.6 kilograms , nearly eight times more than the limit set by the 2015 nuclear deal , the IAEA said in a report @ @ @ @ @ @ @ open about the violations and continues to allow IAEA inspectors access to facilities to monitor their operations .
However , the Vienna-based agency said in a separate report that for more than four months Iran has “ denied access ” to two of three locations it had identified as sites where the country possibly stored undeclared nuclear material or undertook nuclear-related activities without declaring them to international observers .
The IAEA said that the third location “ underwent extensive sanitization and levelling in 2003 and 2004 ” and there would be no verification @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all three sites are thought to have taken place before the nuclear pact with world powers was inked .

This article was originally published by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and is reprinted with permission.
The United Nations’ atomic watchdog said on June 5 that Iran has continued to increase its stockpiles of enriched uranium far beyond the limits set in the 2015 nuclear deal with world powers.
Separately, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) raised “serious concerns” over Iran’s refusal to let international inspectors investigate possible past nuclear activities at two locations.
The United States pulled out of the accord in May 2018 and reimposed crippling sanctions that have battered the Iranian economy.
In response, Tehran has been progressively breaking the restrictions laid down in the deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA, saying that it can reverse them if the remaining parties to the deal — Britain, France, Germany, China and Russia — increase economic incentives.
As of May 20, Iran’s total stockpile of low-enriched uranium amounted to 1,571.6 kilograms, nearly eight times more than the limit set by the 2015 nuclear deal, the IAEA said in a report on June 5.
Iran has been open about the violations and continues to allow IAEA inspectors access to facilities to monitor their operations.
However, the Vienna-based agency said in a separate report that for more than four months Iran has “denied access” to two of three locations it had identified as sites where the country possibly stored undeclared nuclear material or undertook nuclear-related activities without declaring them to international observers.
The IAEA said that the third location “underwent extensive sanitization and levelling in 2003 and 2004” and there would be no verification value in inspecting it.
Activities at all three sites are thought to have taken place before the nuclear pact with world powers was inked.


thelibertydaily--2020-06-07--Democrat California Mayor, Who Identifies as a Woman of Color,  Forced by the Mob to Apologize Over

Democrat California Mayor, Who Identifies as a Woman of Color,  Forced by the Mob to Apologize Over Black Lives Matter Comment

A California mayor who identifies as a woman of color was met with outrage and forced to apologize after she was accused of dismissing the Black Lives Matter movement during a city council meeting earlier this week .
Sashi McEntee , the mayor who is Sri Lankan by heritage , was asked about what Mill Valley is doing to promote and help the movement , ABC 7 News reported .
The person said that he posted a “ White Silence is Violence ” sign that he posted was apparently quickly removed .
58 PERCENT OF COLLEGE-EDUCATED AMERICANS SAY RIOTS ARE @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enough interest in the person ’ s comment and said it is not policy to “ take action on issues that are not of immediate local importance , ” the report said .
Patch reported that a video of the remarks was uploaded to YouTube on Tuesday and went viral .
Mill Valley , a city in Marin County , even trended on Twitter shortly after the comments .
Siobhan Brewer , a resident in the area who is half black , told The Marin Independent Journal that the “ dismissive remark ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an online petition garnered 10,000 signatures calling on her to either apologize or step aside .
EDITOR ’ S NOTE : Social media is cracking down on Conservative content .
Many of you have complained that you never see our content in your news feeds .
There ’ s only one way to fight back — and that ’ s by subscribing to my FREE weekly newsletter .
Click here .
Celimene Pastor , a black resident , told the paper that she was appalled by the mayor ’ s comment .
WOKE @ @ @ @ @ @ @ AMERICA “ As parents of four biracial black children , we are concerned for their well being and her comments did not put our worries at ease .
Mill Valley can do better and we need stronger leadership , ” she said .
McEntee released a statement on Tuesday where she called the death of George Floyd while in police custody “ tragic ” and certainly a matter of local importance .
“ As a person of color , I am acutely aware of the power and importance of words because I have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ myself , ” she said .
“ It is clear that I did not express myself well or share with the community what is in my heart.
” McEntee apologized “ for my choice of words at the council meeting .
This is a sensitive moment , and I didn ’ t acknowledge the community ’ s deep sense of hurt and anger .
For that , I am truly sorry .
”

A California mayor who identifies as a woman of color was met with outrage and forced to apologize after she was accused of dismissing the Black Lives Matter movement during a city council meeting earlier this week.
Sashi McEntee, the mayor who is Sri Lankan by heritage, was asked about what Mill Valley is doing to promote and help the movement, ABC 7 News reported. The person said that he posted a “White Silence is Violence” sign that he posted was apparently quickly removed.
58 PERCENT OF COLLEGE-EDUCATED AMERICANS SAY RIOTS ARE JUSTIFIED
McEntee was criticized for not showing enough interest in the person’s comment and said it is not policy to “take action on issues that are not of immediate local importance,” the report said.
FOLLOW TODD STARNES ON TWITTER
Patch reported that a video of the remarks was uploaded to YouTube on Tuesday and went viral. Mill Valley, a city in Marin County, even trended on Twitter shortly after the comments.
Siobhan Brewer, a resident in the area who is half black, told The Marin Independent Journal that the “dismissive remark” was hurtful. The paper reported that an online petition garnered 10,000 signatures calling on her to either apologize or step aside.
EDITOR’S NOTE: Social media is cracking down on Conservative content. Many of you have complained that you never see our content in your news feeds. There’s only one way to fight back — and that’s by subscribing to my FREE weekly newsletter. Click here.
Celimene Pastor, a black resident, told the paper that she was appalled by the mayor’s comment.
WOKE: APPARENTLY IT IS RACIST TO LOVE AMERICA
“As parents of four biracial black children, we are concerned for their well being and her comments did not put our worries at ease. Mill Valley can do better and we need stronger leadership,” she said.
McEntee released a statement on Tuesday where she called the death of George Floyd while in police custody “tragic” and certainly a matter of local importance.
“As a person of color, I am acutely aware of the power and importance of words because I have been on the receiving end of bigotry myself,” she said. “It is clear that I did not express myself well or share with the community what is in my heart.”
McEntee apologized “for my choice of words at the council meeting. This is a sensitive moment, and I didn’t acknowledge the community’s deep sense of hurt and anger. For that, I am truly sorry.”


thelibertydaily--2020-06-07--POLL: Most Consider Antifa to be ‘A Terrorist Group’

Ninety-eight percent ( 98 % ) , or 2,225 people , say they think Antifa is a terrorist group .
@ @ @ @ @ results of the latest unscientific survey at SharylAttkisson.com .
Only 1 % said they do @ @ @ @ @ terrorist group .
Read the full results below .
Meantime , be sure and vote @ @ @ @ @ SharylAttkisson.com on the home page .
Look for the black box in the right sidebar @ @ @ @ @ the mobile site !
Do you think Antifa is a terrorist group ?
Order `` @ @ @ @ @ Media Taught Us to Love Censorship and Hate Journalism '' by Sharyl Attkisson at Harper @ @ @ @ @ & Noble , Books a Million , IndieBound , Bookshop !

Ninety-eight percent (98%), or 2,225 people, say they think Antifa is a terrorist group. That's according to the results of the latest unscientific survey at SharylAttkisson.com.
Only 1% said they do not think Antifa is a terrorist group.
Do you think Antifa is a terrorist group?
98% Yes
1% No
<1% Unsure
<1% What's Antifa?