thelibertydaily--2020-09-03--Democrat NY Governor Andrew Cuomo Threatens President: Trump ‘Better Have an Army’ to Protect Him if

Democrat NY Governor Andrew Cuomo Threatens President: Trump ‘Better Have an Army’ to Protect Him if He Comes to NYC

New York Gov .
Andrew Cuomo on Wednesday all but threatened President Trump ’ s safety if he returns to New York City in a rant responding to an exclusive story by The Post that Trump is looking to pull federal funds from “ lawless ” cities including New York .
Cuomo called an emergency press briefing within a half-hour on Wednesday night to tear into Trump for the order , which cites New York ’ s rising murder rate and defunding of the NYPD .
“ He better have an army if he thinks he ’ s gon na @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
New Yorkers don ’ t want to have anything to do with him , ” the Democrat said , all but threatening the commander-in-chief .
But Cuomo — who , like Trump , hails from Queens — wasn ’ t done .
“ He can ’ t have enough bodyguards to walk through New York City , people don ’ t want to have anything to do with him.
” On substance , Cuomo said he doubted the legality of Trump ’ s five-page memo ordering a review of federal funds that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Portland , Seattle and Washington , DC .
“ It is more of the same from him .
It ’ s political , it is gratuitous .
And it ’ s illegal .
But it is another attempt to kill New York City , ” Cuomo said .
“ President Ford said drop dead .
President Trump has been actively trying to kill New York City since he ’ s been elected , ” he said .
In highly personal and insulting language , Cuomo speculated that Trump wasn ’ t upset @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rate and shootings .
“ I think it ’ s because he is from New York City and New York City rejected him , always , ” Cuomo said .
“ He was dismissed as a clown in New York City , those who know him best , like him least.
” Cuomo jeered : “ He was disrespected in New York City .
Nobody took him seriously and he was just a tabloid cartoon.
” Referring to a claim in a recent book by Trump ’ s niece , Mary Trump , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a former federal judge , is disgraced by him.
” The governor also claimed Trump ’ s “ negligence ” is the reason New York state suffered the highest COVID-19 death toll .
The governor ’ s critics blame his Health Department ’ s mandate that forbade nursing homes from turning away COVID-19-positive patients , potentially leading to at least 6,500 deaths .
At the end of his call , Cuomo , apparently sensing how his remarks about Trump could be seen as threatening , attempted to walk them back .
“ My @ @ @ @ @ @ @ New York City , all I ’ m saying is that he is persona non grata in New York City .
And I think he knows that .
And he ’ ll never come back to New York , because New Yorkers will never forget how gratuitously mean he has been to New Yorkers and how many times he ’ s tried to kill the city that gave him his start and birthed him .
That ’ s what I meant about the bodyguards.
” Earlier Wednesday , Trump called on CNN to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Chris Cuomo , over a leaked tape in which he says he was questioned about sexual misconduct .
“ Fredo must go !
” Trump wrote , using an insulting reference from “ The Godfather.
” Meanwhile , New York Mayor Bill de Blasio , who was twice mentioned by name in Trump ’ s order , had his press secretary , Bill Neidhardt , respond .
“ As much as Donald Trump wants New York City to drop dead , we will never let this stand , ” Neidhardt tweeted .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ law and order.
’ This is a racist campaign stunt out of the Oval Office to attack millions of people of color.
” Meanwhile , City Councilman Rory Lancman , chair of the Committee on the Justice System , said Trump ’ s order could unintentionally weaken public safety .
“ I guess we know now which candidate for president supports defunding the police , ” he quipped .
Rep. Max Rose , a Trump-targeted Democrat who represents Staten Island and southern Brooklyn , said , “ With this order , President Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the police .
It was wrong then and it ’ s wrong now .
”

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo on Wednesday all but threatened President Trump’s safety if he returns to New York City in a rant responding to an exclusive story by The Post that Trump is looking to pull federal funds from “lawless” cities including New York.
Cuomo called an emergency press briefing within a half-hour on Wednesday night to tear into Trump for the order, which cites New York’s rising murder rate and defunding of the NYPD.
“He better have an army if he thinks he’s gonna walk down the street in New York. New Yorkers don’t want to have anything to do with him,” the Democrat said, all but threatening the commander-in-chief.
But Cuomo — who, like Trump, hails from Queens — wasn’t done. “He can’t have enough bodyguards to walk through New York City, people don’t want to have anything to do with him.”
On substance, Cuomo said he doubted the legality of Trump’s five-page memo ordering a review of federal funds that can be redirected from New York City, Portland, Seattle and Washington, DC.
“It is more of the same from him. It’s political, it is gratuitous. And it’s illegal. But it is another attempt to kill New York City,” Cuomo said.
“President Ford said drop dead. President Trump has been actively trying to kill New York City since he’s been elected,” he said.
In highly personal and insulting language, Cuomo speculated that Trump wasn’t upset about New York’s soaring murder rate and shootings.
“I think it’s because he is from New York City and New York City rejected him, always,” Cuomo said. “He was dismissed as a clown in New York City, those who know him best, like him least.”
Cuomo jeered: “He was disrespected in New York City. Nobody took him seriously and he was just a tabloid cartoon.”
Referring to a claim in a recent book by Trump’s niece, Mary Trump, Cuomo said, “his sister, a former federal judge, is disgraced by him.”
The governor also claimed Trump’s “negligence” is the reason New York state suffered the highest COVID-19 death toll. The governor’s critics blame his Health Department’s mandate that forbade nursing homes from turning away COVID-19-positive patients, potentially leading to at least 6,500 deaths.
At the end of his call, Cuomo, apparently sensing how his remarks about Trump could be seen as threatening, attempted to walk them back.
“My comment about the president and bodyguards in New York City, all I’m saying is that he is persona non grata in New York City. And I think he knows that. And he’ll never come back to New York, because New Yorkers will never forget how gratuitously mean he has been to New Yorkers and how many times he’s tried to kill the city that gave him his start and birthed him. That’s what I meant about the bodyguards.”
Earlier Wednesday, Trump called on CNN to fire Cuomo’s younger brother, Chris Cuomo, over a leaked tape in which he says he was questioned about sexual misconduct. “Fredo must go!” Trump wrote, using an insulting reference from “The Godfather.”
Meanwhile, New York Mayor Bill de Blasio, who was twice mentioned by name in Trump’s order, had his press secretary, Bill Neidhardt, respond.
“As much as Donald Trump wants New York City to drop dead, we will never let this stand,” Neidhardt tweeted. “This has nothing to do with ‘law and order.’ This is a racist campaign stunt out of the Oval Office to attack millions of people of color.”
De Blasio himself made no statement.
Meanwhile, City Councilman Rory Lancman, chair of the Committee on the Justice System, said Trump’s order could unintentionally weaken public safety.
“I guess we know now which candidate for president supports defunding the police,” he quipped.
Rep. Max Rose, a Trump-targeted Democrat who represents Staten Island and southern Brooklyn, said, “With this order, President Trump is joining Mayor de Blasio in defunding the police. It was wrong then and it’s wrong now.”


thelibertydaily--2020-09-03--Flyer from the “Black Lives Matter” Communist Terrorist Organization Says: ‘If it Burns, It Burns; T

Flyer from the “Black Lives Matter” Communist Terrorist Organization Says: ‘If it Burns, It Burns; This is War’

The flyer for Friday 's upcoming Black Lives Matter rally at Hurkamp Park in Fredericksburg , Virginia states , `` @ @

© 2022 NationalFile.com National File, LLC. Privacy. Corrections. About Us. All Rights Reserved.
Have any questions or suggestions? If you are having difficulty unsubscribing from our mail subscription please send an email here info@nationalfile.com Want to advertise with us? Please email: brett@nationalfile.com


thelibertydaily--2020-09-03--Never Woke Enough: Smelling Weakness, Black Lives Matter Marxist Mob Agitate at Democrat DC Mayor Mu

Never Woke Enough: Smelling Weakness, Black Lives Matter Marxist Mob Agitate at Democrat DC Mayor Muriel Bowser’s Home After Midnight

A Black Lives Matter mob protested outside DC Mayor Muriel Bowser ’ s home over the fatal officer involved shooting of Deon Kay .
The “ protesters ” were chanting “ if we don ’ t get no justice , you don ’ t get no sleep , ” and “ if we don ’ t get it , burn it down.
” TRENDING : Debate Moderators Announced for Presidential Debates -- All Are Trump-Haters with Chris Wallace Being the Worst As the Gateway Pundit previously reported , at approximately 3:51 p.m. on Wednesday , uniformed police officers responded to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a vehicle with a gun .
When they arrived , they found four people in the vehicle .
Two of them fled , including Kay .
During the chase , Kay brandished a firearm .
At this point , an officer fired one single shot , hitting Kay .
The suspect was transported to the hospital for treatment , but it was unsuccessful .
Before many details about the incident were known , a Black Lives Matter mob had gathered at DC ’ s 7th Precinct .
They held their public tantrum there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ group decided to go protest at Mayor Muriel Bowser ’ s home .
Bowser , of course , renamed a portion of the street outside the White House in honor of the far-left extremist organization and vandalized the street with an eyesore of a BLM mural .
The group has vowed to return to the mayor ’ s home at 6 a.m. on Thursday .
Body camera footage of the shooting is also expected to be released on Thursday .

A Black Lives Matter mob protested outside DC Mayor Muriel Bowser’s home over the fatal officer involved shooting of Deon Kay.
The “protesters” were chanting “if we don’t get no justice, you don’t get no sleep,” and “if we don’t get it, burn it down.”
As the Gateway Pundit previously reported, at approximately 3:51 p.m. on Wednesday, uniformed police officers responded to a call to investigate a man in a vehicle with a gun. When they arrived, they found four people in the vehicle. Two of them fled, including Kay.
During the chase, Kay brandished a firearm. At this point, an officer fired one single shot, hitting Kay. The suspect was transported to the hospital for treatment, but it was unsuccessful.
Before many details about the incident were known, a Black Lives Matter mob had gathered at DC’s 7th Precinct. They held their public tantrum there for a little while, before a group decided to go protest at Mayor Muriel Bowser’s home.
Protesters At DC Mayor’s House https://t.co/HR17YWcnBz — Ford Fischer (@FordFischer) September 3, 2020
Bowser, of course, renamed a portion of the street outside the White House in honor of the far-left extremist organization and vandalized the street with an eyesore of a BLM mural.
The group has vowed to return to the mayor’s home at 6 a.m. on Thursday.
Body camera footage of the shooting is also expected to be released on Thursday.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-03--Rep. Jody Hice: Democrats are Using Mail-In Voting to ‘Throw Into Question The Validity’ Of The Elec

Rep. Jody Hice: Democrats are Using Mail-In Voting to ‘Throw Into Question The Validity’ Of The Election Outcome

On “ The Sara Carter Show ” Monday , Rep. Jody Hice , R-GA , revealed what he believes Democrats are doing to stop President Donald Trump from again winning in the 2020 election because they know “ he ’ s going to be reelected.
” It was done before .
In the 2016 election , it was the Russia hoax based on a fake dossier on Trump and his campaign .
It was also an extensive spy operation by the Obama administration and his FBI based on that dossier .
Sara A. Carter was first on that story and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as U.S. Attorney John Durham wraps his investigation .
However , it ’ s possible that Durham may not finish before November .
Four years later , Democrats are pushing for sweeping changes to the format of the 2020 election .
They claim in order to mitigate the spread of the novel coronavirus , states will need to hold sweeping mail-in elections .
It ’ s completely different from absentee voting , and , instead , means qualified voters will receive ballots without a request or a legitimate reason like absentee requires .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ what the democrats want , ” Hice told Carter .
“ They want to throw into question the validity of the upcoming election .
I believe that they know they are in trouble .
President Trump is going to be reelected .
They are trying to set the stage now for questioning the validity of the outcome and set it up to where at least there are potential for thousands of lawsuits and delay this thing and to just create as much muddy water as they possibly can.
” Rep. Hice pointed to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ D-NY , who chairs the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee .
Maloney ’ s election in New York took six weeks to count all of the ballots and thousands of mail-in ballots were disqualified from that election .
Last month , it caught the attention of President Trump who suggested there should be a re-do election .
Many states that have already implemented vote-by-mail elections and have said at least ten percent of the mailed ballots aren ’ t counted .
It ’ s also ripe for fraud , Hice suggested .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of millions of ballots that will be going to people perhaps who are deceased , who have moved like the example you just gave , these ballots are going to be good going out , the Democrats already in the HEROES act , they passed a little over three months ago forbids states from having any voter ID , ” Rep. Hice explained .
He added , “ So we have these mail out ballots being sent by the millions and millions .
tens of millions , no voter ID , as you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ someone ’ s address , they will be filled out .
And we will have no way of checking who is filling them out .
And then they will be ballot harvesting nationally .
That is a recipe for absolute disaster in destroying the integrity of the American election system .
But that is precisely what the Democrats are pushing for .
”

On “The Sara Carter Show” Monday, Rep. Jody Hice, R-GA, revealed what he believes Democrats are doing to stop President Donald Trump from again winning in the 2020 election because they know “he’s going to be reelected.”
It was done before. In the 2016 election, it was the Russia hoax based on a fake dossier on Trump and his campaign. It was also an extensive spy operation by the Obama administration and his FBI based on that dossier. Sara A. Carter was first on that story and the facts are still coming to light as U.S. Attorney John Durham wraps his investigation. However, it’s possible that Durham may not finish before November.
Four years later, Democrats are pushing for sweeping changes to the format of the 2020 election. They claim in order to mitigate the spread of the novel coronavirus, states will need to hold sweeping mail-in elections. It’s completely different from absentee voting, and, instead, means qualified voters will receive ballots without a request or a legitimate reason like absentee requires.
“I believe this is part of what the democrats want,” Hice told Carter. “They want to throw into question the validity of the upcoming election. I believe that they know they are in trouble. President Trump is going to be reelected. They are trying to set the stage now for questioning the validity of the outcome and set it up to where at least there are potential for thousands of lawsuits and delay this thing and to just create as much muddy water as they possibly can.”
Rep. Hice pointed to the reelection of Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-NY, who chairs the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. Maloney’s election in New York took six weeks to count all of the ballots and thousands of mail-in ballots were disqualified from that election. Last month, it caught the attention of President Trump who suggested there should be a re-do election.
Many states that have already implemented vote-by-mail elections and have said at least ten percent of the mailed ballots aren’t counted. It’s also ripe for fraud, Hice suggested.
“So we’re talking tens of millions of ballots that will be going to people perhaps who are deceased, who have moved like the example you just gave, these ballots are going to be good going out, the Democrats already in the HEROES act, they passed a little over three months ago forbids states from having any voter ID,” Rep. Hice explained.
He added, “So we have these mail out ballots being sent by the millions and millions. tens of millions, no voter ID, as you referenced, they will be going to someone’s address, they will be filled out. And we will have no way of checking who is filling them out. And then they will be ballot harvesting nationally. That is a recipe for absolute disaster in destroying the integrity of the American election system. But that is precisely what the Democrats are pushing for.”


thelibertydaily--2020-09-03--Bad News For Oregon Antifa Tinkerpots–The Federal Gov’t Has Cross-Deputized State Officers

Antifa ’ s been employing a tactic of holding citizens hostage by rioting in places where law enforcement ’ s hands are tied by non-enforcement , complicit politicians , and corrupted District Attorneys .
But Trump ’ s administration has just beat them at their own game .
The deliberate decision of Multinoma ’ s DA to not prosecute 100s of provocateurs busted for rioting is just one example of that process in action .
Read more : District Attorney Drops Charges On HUNDREDS Of ‘ Peaceful ’ Portland Protesters The riots that Bernie Sanders organizers promised us would come @ @ @ @ @ @ @ schedule .
Remember this video in which he pledged to be involved in an armed rebellion pushing for the dissolution of America ?
PROJECT VERITAS : Bernie Staffer Part III … Praising AK47s , Gulags , And Soviet Slave Labor He said ‘ I ’ m ready for the f**king revolution.
’ and ‘ I ’ m ready to start tearing up bricks and start fighting ’ .
Gee , now that Sanders doesn ’ t have a campaign that needs running anymore .
You wonder what he and his buddies are up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ When someone tells you who they really are — believe them .
So , how exactly did Trump ’ s DOJ just beat these dangerous maniacs at their own game ?
By cross-deputizing State Troopers , they are cutting any ‘ discretion ’ of Portland ’ s dangerous DA out of the equation .
Oregon State Police ( OSP ) troopers assigned to help the Portland Police Bureau with its response to the city ’ s nightly protests have been cross-deputized by the federal government .
The move actually happened earlier this summer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to help facilitate the departure of federal officers from downtown Portland , according to Gov .
Kate Brown ’ s deputy communications director .
But the cross-deputization of OSP troopers could allow state police to bypass the Multnomah County District Attorney ’ s Office entirely when it comes to charges against arrested protesters .
Multnomah County District Attorney Mike Schmidt has said he won ’ t prosecute protesters arrested for lesser offenses , like interfering with a police officer or ignoring police orders to clear the streets .
Schmidt released a single statement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he had a response to the cross-deputization of OSP troopers .
…Last night on The Story with Dan Haggerty , KGW ’ s Pat Dooris explained what the move to have the federal government deputize state troopers means for the protests in Portland going forward : Dooris : This is basically the ground changing under the feet of the protesters .
because when the state police come in and are cross-deputized by the [ U.S .
Marshals ] , they ’ re able to make arrests under the federal law .
And I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to interfering with a police officer under the federal law .
[ Multnomah County District Attorney Mike Schmidt ] will not prosecute someone for that charge , but the U.S. Attorney ’ s Office has been much more aggressive at holding people accountable and prosecuting for all kinds of charges .
So , I think you ’ re going to see a lot more of that start to happen as soon as these officers arrive .
—KGW8 And if you look carefully at her right eye , it looks like her makeup was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ related .
It might be dawning on her just how badly she has gone and screwed up her life by playing ‘ war ’ with her Bolshevik buddies .
She can ’ t count on those Soros dollars to buy her sorry ass out of jail now .

Antifa’s been employing a tactic of holding citizens hostage by rioting in places where law enforcement’s hands are tied by non-enforcement, complicit politicians, and corrupted District Attorneys.
But Trump’s administration has just beat them at their own game.
For context and background:
The deliberate decision of Multinoma’s DA to not prosecute 100s of provocateurs busted for rioting is just one example of that process in action. Read more:District Attorney Drops Charges On HUNDREDS Of ‘Peaceful’ Portland Protesters
Catch-and-release criminality has emboldened these bottom-feeding brick-chucking Bolsheviks.
The riots that Bernie Sanders organizers promised us would come this summer has arrived, right on schedule. Remember this video in which he pledged to be involved in an armed rebellion pushing for the dissolution of America? PROJECT VERITAS: Bernie Staffer Part III … Praising AK47s, Gulags, And Soviet Slave Labor He said ‘I’m ready for the f**king revolution.’ and ‘I’m ready to start tearing up bricks and start fighting’.
Gee, now that Sanders doesn’t have a campaign that needs running anymore. You wonder what he and his buddies are up to right about now, dontcha?
When someone tells you who they really are — believe them.
So, how exactly did Trump’s DOJ just beat these dangerous maniacs at their own game?
By cross-deputizing State Troopers, they are cutting any ‘discretion’ of Portland’s dangerous DA out of the equation.
Oregon State Police (OSP) troopers assigned to help the Portland Police Bureau with its response to the city’s nightly protests have been cross-deputized by the federal government. The move actually happened earlier this summer, when state troopers were brought in to help facilitate the departure of federal officers from downtown Portland, according to Gov. Kate Brown’s deputy communications director. But the cross-deputization of OSP troopers could allow state police to bypass the Multnomah County District Attorney’s Office entirely when it comes to charges against arrested protesters. Multnomah County District Attorney Mike Schmidt has said he won’t prosecute protesters arrested for lesser offenses, like interfering with a police officer or ignoring police orders to clear the streets. Schmidt released a single statement on Wednesday when asked by KGW if he had a response to the cross-deputization of OSP troopers. …Last night on The Story with Dan Haggerty, KGW’s Pat Dooris explained what the move to have the federal government deputize state troopers means for the protests in Portland going forward: Dooris: This is basically the ground changing under the feet of the protesters. because when the state police come in and are cross-deputized by the [U.S. Marshals], they’re able to make arrests under the federal law. And I’m told there is something similar to interfering with a police officer under the federal law. [Multnomah County District Attorney Mike Schmidt] will not prosecute someone for that charge, but the U.S. Attorney’s Office has been much more aggressive at holding people accountable and prosecuting for all kinds of charges. So, I think you’re going to see a lot more of that start to happen as soon as these officers arrive. —KGW8
Here’s one example:
The significance of this charge is that rioters in Ore. can now be FEDERALLY charged for crimes against state officers. It was reported yesterday @ORStatePolice have been cross-deputized by the federal government. This bypasses @DAMikeSchmidt's catch & release policy. #antifa https://t.co/CXSVMM23py — Andy Ngô (@MrAndyNgo) September 2, 2020
And if you look carefully at her right eye, it looks like her makeup was running.
It could be tear gas related.
OR…
It might be dawning on her just how badly she has gone and screwed up her life by playing ‘war’ with her Bolshevik buddies.
She can’t count on those Soros dollars to buy her sorry ass out of jail now.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-03--His Name Is Joseph Roland/Her Name Is Jossline Roland: Married White Couple with Five Children Murde

His Name Is Joseph Roland/Her Name Is Jossline Roland: Married White Couple with Five Children Murdered in “Car Scam Gone Wrong” By Black Teenager

It ’ s called a boilerplate for a reason .
There ’ s no use in reinventing the wheel now .
The United States of America is a big country , with more than 330 million people .
Why should the death of a black male such as George Floyd or a Jacob Blake become a casus belli for a purported war on a society riddled with systemic racism/white privilege/white supremacy/implicit bias/institutional racism , when the murder of two white people by a black male is greeted by extreme silence by this same society ?
If America truly was a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ racism/white privilege/white supremacy/implicit bias/institutional racism ( as we are constantly told by those in total control of corporate media/public corporations/academia/and professional sports franchises ) , then why is the story of Laura Anderson and Charles Wall not dominating the news cycle and ushering in emergency legislation to castigate all black people for their callous murder ?
take our poll - story continues below Because if America was truly awash with systemic racism and implicit bias , how they died and who murdered them would be the only story we ’ d hear/read about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about how they died and who murdered them is a reminder of the power of black privilege in America .
His name is Joseph Roland .
Her Name is Jossline Roland .
They were a white couple , with five children .
They are dead , murdered in a car scam gone wrong by a black teenager .
[ Police : Man killed Aurora couple during robbery , car scam gone wrong , KDVR.com , August 31 , 2020 ] : A murdered Aurora couple was trying to buy a used car online @ @ @ @ @ @ @ obtained by FOX31 indicates .
Jossline Roland , 40 , and Joseph Roland , 39 were killed on Aug. 14 just before midnight on East Cornell Circle .
Police said they had met up with 18-year-old Kyree Brown to purchase a vehicle listed on LetGo , an online sales app .
When interviewing Brown , he allegedly admitted to stealing the car then taking pictures and posting it for sale online using a fake name .
After meeting the Rolands , Brown allegedly said that he had brought the wrong ownership title and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ home .
When they arrived at East Cornell Circle address , Brown allegedly got out of his car , pointed a gun at the Rolands , demanded the money they had agreed to buy the car with .
Brown said that at this point , Joseph Roland grabbed his arm and the vehicle began moving .
This is when Brown allegedly admitted to police that he intentionally shot Joseph and accidentally shot Jossline .
Police say while the vehicle was moving , Brown reached in and grabbed about $ 3,000 off the dashboard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and driving away .
Police say Brown then drove the stolen car to an area near Havana Street and East Colfax Avenue where he set the car on fire .
His name is Joseph Roland .
Her Name is Jossline Roland .
Were we a society fueled by white privilege , you ’ d be encountering these two names wherever you went .
Instead , all you read/hear about are the names George Floyd and Jacob Blake .
• His Name Is Joseph Roland/Her Name Is Jossline Roland : Married White Couple with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gone Wrong ” By Black Teenager • Black Billionaire Hypocrite : Oprah Threatens That America Can not Move Forward Until “ Racial Injustice ” And “ Betrayal Of Blacks ” Is Acknowledged

It’s called a boilerplate for a reason. There’s no use in reinventing the wheel now.
The United States of America is a big country, with more than 330 million people.
Why should the death of a black male such as George Floyd or a Jacob Blake become a casus belli for a purported war on a society riddled with systemic racism/white privilege/white supremacy/implicit bias/institutional racism, when the murder of two white people by a black male is greeted by extreme silence by this same society?
take our poll - story continues below
Completing this poll grants you access to DC Clothesline updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
If America truly was a nation fueled by the evils of systemic racism/white privilege/white supremacy/implicit bias/institutional racism (as we are constantly told by those in total control of corporate media/public corporations/academia/and professional sports franchises), then why is the story of Laura Anderson and Charles Wall not dominating the news cycle and ushering in emergency legislation to castigate all black people for their callous murder?
Because if America was truly awash with systemic racism and implicit bias, how they died and who murdered them would be the only story we’d hear/read about.
But that few will ever read about how they died and who murdered them is a reminder of the power of black privilege in America.
His name is Joseph Roland. Her Name is Jossline Roland. They were a white couple, with five children. They are dead, murdered in a car scam gone wrong by a black teenager. [Police: Man killed Aurora couple during robbery, car scam gone wrong, KDVR.com, August 31, 2020]:
A murdered Aurora couple was trying to buy a used car online when they were killed, police paperwork obtained by FOX31 indicates.
Jossline Roland, 40, and Joseph Roland, 39 were killed on Aug. 14 just before midnight on East Cornell Circle.
Police said they had met up with 18-year-old Kyree Brown to purchase a vehicle listed on LetGo, an online sales app.
When interviewing Brown, he allegedly admitted to stealing the car then taking pictures and posting it for sale online using a fake name.
After meeting the Rolands, Brown allegedly said that he had brought the wrong ownership title and asked them to follow him to his home.
When they arrived at East Cornell Circle address, Brown allegedly got out of his car, pointed a gun at the Rolands, demanded the money they had agreed to buy the car with.
Brown said that at this point, Joseph Roland grabbed his arm and the vehicle began moving. This is when Brown allegedly admitted to police that he intentionally shot Joseph and accidentally shot Jossline.
Police say while the vehicle was moving, Brown reached in and grabbed about $3,000 off the dashboard before running back to the stolen car and driving away.
Police say Brown then drove the stolen car to an area near Havana Street and East Colfax Avenue where he set the car on fire.
You Might Like
His name is Joseph Roland. Her Name is Jossline Roland. Were we a society fueled by white privilege, you’d be encountering these two names wherever you went. Instead, all you read/hear about are the names George Floyd and Jacob Blake.
Black-Run America (BRA) indeed.
Courtesy of UNZ.com
Trending Today


thelibertydaily--2020-09-04--OUCH! CNN’s Don Lemon Blasts Pelosi Over Salon Trip, Mocks Her ‘Setup’ Claim: ‘Shouldn’t She Know Be

OUCH! CNN’s Don Lemon Blasts Pelosi Over Salon Trip, Mocks Her ‘Setup’ Claim: ‘Shouldn’t She Know Better?’

The Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi ( D-CA ) , who has supported full lockdowns over COVID-19 and advocates a national mask policy , was caught dropping into a hair salon in California — ordered closed by the governor — and walking around without a mask .
It took the 81-year-old California Democrat a while to come up with a defense : it was all a setup .
But even some hardcore liberals have had a hard time swallowing that one .
“ So the speaker of the House is blaming the salon after she didn ’ t wear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ salon owner is denying it was a setup , ” Lemon said .
“ Regardless , this far into the pandemic , the House speaker should know what is safe and what isn ’ t .
We should all know .
It ’ s our responsibility .
Instead of claiming a setup , would have been just as easy for the speaker to say , ‘ You know what ?
I messed up .
I should have worn a mask indoors . '
” And Lemon scolded Pelosi like a child : “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” In security footage obtained by Fox News , timestamped Monday at 3:08 p.m. PT , Pelosi can be seen walking through the eSalon in San Francisco without a mask .
Ironically , during an appearance on MSNBC that same night , Pelosi blasted President Trump for delivering his Republican National Convention acceptance speech before a live audience on the White House South Lawn , where many people were not wearing masks .
Salon owner Erica Kious said in an interview with Fox News on Tuesday that Pelosi ’ s visit is clear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It was a slap in the face that she went in , you know , that she feels that she can just go and get her stuff done while no one else can go in , and I can ’ t work , ” Kious said , adding that she “ can ’ t believe ” the speaker didn ’ t have a mask covering her face .
“ We ’ re supposed to look up to this woman , right ?
” Kious said .
“ It is just disturbing.
” Pelosi @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , refusing to apologize for breaking state ordinances — and instead declared that she deserves an apology .
“ So I take responsibility for falling for a setup .
And that ’ s all I ’ m going to say on that , ” Pelosi said .
“ I think that this salon owes me an apology , for setting me up.
” “ I take responsibility for trusting the word of the neighborhood salon that I ’ ve been to over the years many times , and when they said , ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one person at a time.
’ I trusted that , ” the speaker said , according to the San Francisco Chronicle .
“ You can ’ t get your hair done , eat inside at a restaurant , travel , attend a funeral , or protest without mandatory quarantining .
But Democrats can , ” Harrington wrote in an email to the Chronicle .
“ This isn ’ t about health or science .
It ’ s about power .
Democrats want to rule your life .
But don ’ t expect their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Daily Wire is one of America ’ s fastest-growing conservative media companies and counter-cultural outlets for news , opinion , and entertainment .
Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a member .

The Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), who has supported full lockdowns over COVID-19 and advocates a national mask policy, was caught dropping into a hair salon in California — ordered closed by the governor — and walking around without a mask. It took the 81-year-old California Democrat a while to come up with a defense: it was all a setup.
But even some hardcore liberals have had a hard time swallowing that one.
“So the speaker of the House is blaming the salon after she didn’t wear a mask indoors. Tonight, the salon owner is denying it was a setup,” Lemon said. “Regardless, this far into the pandemic, the House speaker should know what is safe and what isn’t. We should all know. It’s our responsibility. Instead of claiming a setup, would have been just as easy for the speaker to say, ‘You know what? I messed up. I should have worn a mask indoors.'”
And Lemon scolded Pelosi like a child: “Shouldn’t she know better?”
In security footage obtained by Fox News, timestamped Monday at 3:08 p.m. PT, Pelosi can be seen walking through the eSalon in San Francisco without a mask. Ironically, during an appearance on MSNBC that same night, Pelosi blasted President Trump for delivering his Republican National Convention acceptance speech before a live audience on the White House South Lawn, where many people were not wearing masks.
Salon owner Erica Kious said in an interview with Fox News on Tuesday that Pelosi’s visit is clear evidence of a double standard.
“It was a slap in the face that she went in, you know, that she feels that she can just go and get her stuff done while no one else can go in, and I can’t work,” Kious said, adding that she “can’t believe” the speaker didn’t have a mask covering her face.
“We’re supposed to look up to this woman, right?” Kious said. “It is just disturbing.”
Pelosi doubled down on her actions on Wednesday, refusing to apologize for breaking state ordinances — and instead declared that she deserves an apology.
“So I take responsibility for falling for a setup. And that’s all I’m going to say on that,” Pelosi said. “I think that this salon owes me an apology, for setting me up.”
“I take responsibility for trusting the word of the neighborhood salon that I’ve been to over the years many times, and when they said, ‘We’re able to accommodate people one person at a time.’ I trusted that,” the speaker said, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.
Republican National Committee spokeswoman Liz Harrington cut loose on Pelosi.
“You can’t get your hair done, eat inside at a restaurant, travel, attend a funeral, or protest without mandatory quarantining. But Democrats can,” Harrington wrote in an email to the Chronicle. “This isn’t about health or science. It’s about power. Democrats want to rule your life. But don’t expect their rules to apply to them.”


thelibertydaily--2020-09-04--Fast Kamala Harris’ Rampant Prosecutorial Abuses

She may tout herself as a “ progressive prosecutor , ” but Kamala ...

“America has a deep and dark history of people using the power of the prosecutor as an instrument of injustice,” Kamala Harris wrote in her 2019 campaign tract. “I know this history well — of innocent men framed, of charges brought against people of color without sufficient evidence, of prosecutors hiding information that would exonerate defendants, of the disproportionate application of the law.”
She should know. As a prosecutor, Harris too often abused her office in just the way she decried as a campaigner.
The former San Francisco district attorney and California attorney general is the last person who should lecture anyone on out-of-control prosecutors. When she talks about framing the innocent and hiding exculpatory evidence, Harris is either projecting or engaging in rank hypocrisy.
Some of Harris’ prosecutorial shenanigans are well-known by now. In 2010, a California Superior Court judge blistered Harris’ DA office for violating defendants’ rights by covering up detrimental information about a drug-lab technician. The judge concluded that prosecutors working under Harris had failed to fulfill their constitutional duty to tell defense attorneys information about prosecution witnesses that might challenge their credibility. The failure of Harris’ prosecutors led to the dismissal of more than 600 drug cases.
Hiding information, indeed.
As California attorney general, Harris appealed a judge’s decision to remove the Orange County district attorney’s office from a death penalty trial after evidence emerged that the sheriff’s department had been operating an unconstitutional jailhouse snitch program. The program tainted more than a dozen criminal cases, several of them murder trials.
Californians witnessed more of Harris’ devil-may-care — or devilish — approach to government corruption and misconduct in the Moonlight Fire case. In 2007, a late summer wildfire had burned 65,000 acres in the California Sierras. The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection’s lead wildfire investigator lied repeatedly about the inferno’s origin and cause. He also destroyed his investigatory notes and, along with the US Forest Service investigators, falsified the joint origin-and-cause report and various witness statements. The goal was to pin the blame — and cost of fighting the fire — on private landowners.
When California Superior Court Judge Leslie C. Nichols reviewed the case, he found the investigatory and discovery abuses so “pervasive” and “egregious” — so “corrupt and tainted” — that he terminated Cal Fire’s action and administered sanctions. He ruled that Cal Fire’s targets could never get a fair trial. The California Court of Appeals upheld Nichols’ overall ruling. In reviewing the abuses in the joint federal-state Moonlight investigation, the appellate court found “substantial evidence” Cal Fire “repeatedly presented false, misleading or evasive discovery responses” and deposition testimony in addition to improperly destroying field notes despite probable civil litigation.
In the course of the Moonlight Fire litigation, the landowners’ attorneys discovered that Cal Fire illegally diverted $3.66 million in state funds to a secret slush fund controlled by a small group of Cal Fire employees. This was a felony under state law, and California legislators asked Harris to investigate this misappropriation of public funds. Harris, however, said she couldn’t investigate because she was representing Cal Fire in the Moonlight Fire lawsuit. She claimed that Cal Fire was, therefore, her “client and she had an ethical conflict of interest.”
It’s worth considering the implications of Harris’ lame claim that it is impossible and unethical for the attorney general to investigate the executive-branch employees of agencies because the attorney general represents the executive-branch agencies in certain lawsuits.
If she takes that position at the federal level, there could never be a Department of Justice investigation of any executive-branch employee. This is preposterous. It seems clear that Harris refused to investigate, because it would have disclosed felony conduct that would be difficult not to prosecute. And any investigation would have also demonstrated that her Moonlight Fire lawsuit was fraudulent.
If the Biden-Harris ticket triumphs in November, she will be a heartbeat away from the presidency. Yet there is a pattern and a practice — “a deep and dark history” — of Kamala Harris “using the power of the prosecutor as an instrument of injustice.”
Ann Corkery is a lawyer in Washington, DC.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-04--ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR ANNOUNCES ANTI-TRUST LAWSUIT AGAINST GOOGLE!

The New York Times is reporting that they are bringing an antitrust lawsuit against Google as soon as this month : Here ’ s more from their article , which tries to spin hard that Barr is just doing this now because he wants credit : The Justice Department plans to bring an antitrust case against Google as soon as this month , after Attorney General William P. Barr overruled career lawyers who said they needed more time to build a strong case against one of the world ’ s wealthiest , most formidable technology companies , according to five @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Justice Department officials told lawyers involved in the antitrust inquiry into Alphabet , the parent company of Google and YouTube , to wrap up their work by the end of September , according to three of the people .
Most of the 40-odd lawyers who had been working on the investigation opposed the deadline .
Some said they would not sign the complaint , and several of them left the case this summer .
Some argued this summer in a memo that ran hundreds of pages that they could bring a strong case @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people who described the document .
Disagreement persisted among the team over how broad the complaint should be and what Google could do to resolve the problems the government uncovered .
The lawyers viewed the deadline as arbitrary .
While there were disagreements about tactics , career lawyers also expressed concerns that Mr. Barr wanted to announce the case in September to take credit for action against a powerful tech company under the Trump administration .
But Mr. Barr felt that the department had moved too slowly and that the deadline was not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Department official .
Five negative paragraphs about how rash Barr is being , and only one little positive one about him believing they are moving too slowly .
And now it picks up again , with the Times essentially accusing Barr of doing this to help Trump win the election : A former telecom industry executive who argued an antitrust matter before the Supreme Court , Mr. Barr has shown a deep interest in the Google investigation .
He has requested regular briefings on the department ’ s case , taking thick binders @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vacations and returning with ideas and notes .
When Mr. Barr imposed a deadline on the investigation , some lawyers feared that the move was in keeping with his willingness to override the recommendations of career lawyers in cases that are of keen interest to President Trump , who has accused Google of bias against him .
The Google case could also give Mr. Trump and Mr. Barr an election-season achievement on an issue that both Democrats and Republicans see as a major problem : the influence of the biggest tech companies over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ practices have stifled new competitors and hobbled legacy industries like telecom and media .
This is the same song and dance by Democrats and the media ( one and the same ) again .
Barr is playing politics to help Trump !
Barr is using his position to help Trump get reelected !
BARR MUST BE DESTROYED !
!
!
And after all of this , they still aren ’ t getting into any substance .
You can read the rest if you want , but I ’ m not going to waste @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is that Barr is going to attempt to hold Google accountable .
Hopefully we ’ ll get more good information on this in the coming days and weeks .

The New York Times is reporting that they are bringing an antitrust lawsuit against Google as soon as this month:
Breaking News: The Justice Department plans to bring an antitrust suit against Google as soon as this month, people briefed on internal conversations said, after Attorney General Bill Barr overruled career lawyers who said they needed more time. https://t.co/9dbgEj42Tu — The New York Times (@nytimes) September 3, 2020
Here’s more from their article, which tries to spin hard that Barr is just doing this now because he wants credit:
The Justice Department plans to bring an antitrust case against Google as soon as this month, after Attorney General William P. Barr overruled career lawyers who said they needed more time to build a strong case against one of the world’s wealthiest, most formidable technology companies, according to five people briefed on internal department conversations. Justice Department officials told lawyers involved in the antitrust inquiry into Alphabet, the parent company of Google and YouTube, to wrap up their work by the end of September, according to three of the people. Most of the 40-odd lawyers who had been working on the investigation opposed the deadline. Some said they would not sign the complaint, and several of them left the case this summer. Some argued this summer in a memo that ran hundreds of pages that they could bring a strong case but needed more time, according to people who described the document. Disagreement persisted among the team over how broad the complaint should be and what Google could do to resolve the problems the government uncovered. The lawyers viewed the deadline as arbitrary. While there were disagreements about tactics, career lawyers also expressed concerns that Mr. Barr wanted to announce the case in September to take credit for action against a powerful tech company under the Trump administration. But Mr. Barr felt that the department had moved too slowly and that the deadline was not unreasonable, according to a senior Justice Department official.
Five negative paragraphs about how rash Barr is being, and only one little positive one about him believing they are moving too slowly.
And now it picks up again, with the Times essentially accusing Barr of doing this to help Trump win the election:
A former telecom industry executive who argued an antitrust matter before the Supreme Court, Mr. Barr has shown a deep interest in the Google investigation. He has requested regular briefings on the department’s case, taking thick binders of information about it on trips and vacations and returning with ideas and notes. When Mr. Barr imposed a deadline on the investigation, some lawyers feared that the move was in keeping with his willingness to override the recommendations of career lawyers in cases that are of keen interest to President Trump, who has accused Google of bias against him. The Google case could also give Mr. Trump and Mr. Barr an election-season achievement on an issue that both Democrats and Republicans see as a major problem: the influence of the biggest tech companies over consumers and the possibility that their business practices have stifled new competitors and hobbled legacy industries like telecom and media.
This is the same song and dance by Democrats and the media (one and the same) again. Barr is playing politics to help Trump! Barr is using his position to help Trump get reelected! BARR MUST BE DESTROYED!!!
And after all of this, they still aren’t getting into any substance. You can read the rest if you want, but I’m not going to waste any more time.
The good news is that Barr is going to attempt to hold Google accountable. Hopefully we’ll get more good information on this in the coming days and weeks.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-04--Sickening: Kentucky School Asks 5th Grade Students To Complete Racial Injustice Assignment

There is no doubt that the public education system has been taken over by radicals who are ruining impressionable young minds .
For those still not convinced , consider the slanted question about Jacob Blake and Breonna Taylor that a Fayette County School in Kentucky included on a fifth-grade online assignment .
“ This is an assignment for my sons 5th grade class , ” one student ’ s mother tweeted .
“ Indoctrination much ?
How is this ok ?
Please someone help me.
” TRENDING : As Trump Gains on Biden , Rasmussen Uncovers Massive 'Suppression ' of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This is Fayette County Schools , ” she said while showing the website in a video .
What upset the mother most was the question portion of an article from Newsela , an educational content website that currently boasts a link to “ resources for anti-racist teaching and instruction ” on its landing page .
The article was about NBA players boycotting playoff games and included a painfully vague description of Blake as an “ unarmed Black man … shot by police officers ” and threw in Taylor ’ s name as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people by police ” without giving details of those cases .
The questions came at the end of the content , with the first one asking , “ What is the relationship between Jacob Blake and Breonna Taylor ?
” The first answer choice was “ Both were victims of police violence , sparking protests against racial injustice.
” The article and the question seem to advance the narrative of racist police brutality and buy into the race-baiting claim that violent Black Lives Matter protests have used as justification .
Facts are still @ @ @ @ @ @ @ police on Aug. 23 in Kenosha , Wisconsin .
So far , what investigators know is police were responding to a female caller who said the 29-year-old suspect had taken her car keys ; that Blake was wanted for felony sexual assault ; and that there was a knife on the floorboard of his vehicle where he was reaching when he was shot seven times by police .
Add the facts that Blake was ignoring police commands when he reached into the car and that police had already tased him twice , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ less likely , though it will take some time for the justice system to make a determination while Blake recovers from his injuries .
RELATED : High School Football Player Carried 'Thin Blue Line ' Flag Onto Field , Now School Has Banned It Breonna Taylor was killed on March 13 after police raided her Louisville , Kentucky , apartment on a no-knock drug warrant while she and her boyfriend were asleep inside , according to The New York Times .
Police said they announced themselves , but her boyfriend Kenneth Walker claimed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a battering ram breaking down the door .
Walker shot a police officer in the thigh , which he said happened while he was still confused about who was breaking in .
Police returned fire , tragically killing 26-year-old Taylor .
Both cases do involve a police shooting , but there is no indication that police were out for blood or that race had anything to do with either situation .
The Kentucky Peace Officers ’ Association , a professional organization for law enforcement officers , has already spoken out against what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the state .
KPOA posted the recent homework question on its Facebook page on Aug. 31 , and referred to a past statement on the Kentucky Department of Education ’ s publication titled “ Understanding Trauma and Traumatic Stress.
” “ [ W ] e feel the comment ‘ This structural and systemic racism is seen in police brutality and chronic discrepancies in the arrest and incarceration of Black and Brown people.
’ is unsubstantiated , ” the officers ’ association wrote .
“ This statement is inflammatory and prejudicial and as such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ influence someone ’ s opinion of law enforcement professionals.
” “ To understand these issues should be the goal , ” the post continued .
“ The majority of law enforcement officers go to work every day with the goal of helping others and to go home safely at the end of the shift.
” “ To attempt to cast a different light on those hardworking men and women is irresponsible and slanderous.
” “ While it is the responsibility of educational leaders to shape the future , it is not their right @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to intentionally and negatively influence young minds and promote a political agenda , ” KPOA President Chip Nowlin said in a statement to WLEX-TV about the problematic homework question .
“ The way the question was worded was very inappropriate , ” retired educator Jim Combs said to WTVQ-TV .
“ That ’ s something you have to be very careful with , the younger they are , just so they understand.
” Fayette County Public Schools spokeswoman Lisa Deffendall said in a statement that the article and quiz were packaged content not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ did not address the slanted coverage of police shootings .
“ While we appreciate that some may believe the topic was too mature for fifth-graders , it is critical that our classrooms be safe places where students can discuss current events , ” Deffendall said , mischaracterizing objections .
“ Fayette County Public Schools is committed to helping students become civically engaged citizens who are wise consumers of digital media able to think critically about the world around them .
That requires we address difficult topics and teach students to have civil conversations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ view , ” she said .
Clearly , Kentucky schools are all-in on the anti-police social justice nonsense and have no intention to quit shaping schoolchildren into BLM ’ s own image .
They ’ re spoon-feeding this garbage to young , impressionable children , warping their worldview while deepening racial tensions .
They are convincing kids that police officers are dangerous , which does nothing but set them up for contentious interactions with police in the future .
But worst of all , they want to perpetuate a victim mentality for black @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chances at success — which is useful in creating Democratic voters , but tragic for instilling character .
There ’ s a reason teachers don ’ t want parents listening in on virtual classes , and it is because Kentucky schools aren ’ t alone in their systemic anti-police sentiment .
It is a cancer that has spread through powerful leftist teachers ’ unions and has been fortified by common core which strips children of the ability to think for themselves and makes them ripe for the picking .
One hope for these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the tentacles of leftist race theory and anti-police rhetoric will be severed as parents become part of the learning day .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

There is no doubt that the public education system has been taken over by radicals who are ruining impressionable young minds.
For those still not convinced, consider the slanted question about Jacob Blake and Breonna Taylor that a Fayette County School in Kentucky included on a fifth-grade online assignment.
“This is an assignment for my sons 5th grade class,” one student’s mother tweeted. “Indoctrination much? How is this ok? Please someone help me.”
I don’t ever tweet but this needs to be shared. This is an assignment for my sons 5th grade class. Indoctrination much? How is this ok? Please someone help me. @TuckerCarlson @seanhannity @DonaldJTrumpJr @BetsyDeVosED pic.twitter.com/CdrFdYA1xQ — Ashley (@arob61888) September 1, 2020
“This is not fake. This is Fayette County Schools,” she said while showing the website in a video.
What upset the mother most was the question portion of an article from Newsela, an educational content website that currently boasts a link to “resources for anti-racist teaching and instruction” on its landing page.
The article was about NBA players boycotting playoff games and included a painfully vague description of Blake as an “unarmed Black man … shot by police officers” and threw in Taylor’s name as part of the deaths of “Black people by police” without giving details of those cases.
The questions came at the end of the content, with the first one asking, “What is the relationship between Jacob Blake and Breonna Taylor?”
The first answer choice was “Both were victims of police violence, sparking protests against racial injustice.”
The article and the question seem to advance the narrative of racist police brutality and buy into the race-baiting claim that violent Black Lives Matter protests have used as justification.
Facts are still emerging about what happened between Blake and police on Aug. 23 in Kenosha, Wisconsin.
So far, what investigators know is police were responding to a female caller who said the 29-year-old suspect had taken her car keys; that Blake was wanted for felony sexual assault; and that there was a knife on the floorboard of his vehicle where he was reaching when he was shot seven times by police.
Add the facts that Blake was ignoring police commands when he reached into the car and that police had already tased him twice, a case of “police violence” seems less likely, though it will take some time for the justice system to make a determination while Blake recovers from his injuries.
Breonna Taylor was killed on March 13 after police raided her Louisville, Kentucky, apartment on a no-knock drug warrant while she and her boyfriend were asleep inside, according to The New York Times.
Police said they announced themselves, but her boyfriend Kenneth Walker claimed they heard nothing prior to the commotion of a battering ram breaking down the door.
Are public schools trying to turn children into leftist social justice warriors? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 100% (452 Votes) No: 0% (0 Votes)
Walker shot a police officer in the thigh, which he said happened while he was still confused about who was breaking in. Police returned fire, tragically killing 26-year-old Taylor.
Both cases do involve a police shooting, but there is no indication that police were out for blood or that race had anything to do with either situation.
The Kentucky Peace Officers’ Association, a professional organization for law enforcement officers, has already spoken out against what is being taught about police officers in the state.
KPOA posted the recent homework question on its Facebook page on Aug. 31, and referred to a past statement on the Kentucky Department of Education’s publication titled “Understanding Trauma and Traumatic Stress.”
“[W]e feel the comment ‘This structural and systemic racism is seen in police brutality and chronic discrepancies in the arrest and incarceration of Black and Brown people.’ is unsubstantiated,” the officers’ association wrote. “This statement is inflammatory and prejudicial and as such serves no purpose other than to negatively influence someone’s opinion of law enforcement professionals.”
“To understand these issues should be the goal,” the post continued. “The majority of law enforcement officers go to work every day with the goal of helping others and to go home safely at the end of the shift.”
“To attempt to cast a different light on those hardworking men and women is irresponsible and slanderous.”
“While it is the responsibility of educational leaders to shape the future, it is not their right to do so in a manner designed to intentionally and negatively influence young minds and promote a political agenda,” KPOA President Chip Nowlin said in a statement to WLEX-TV about the problematic homework question.
“The way the question was worded was very inappropriate,” retired educator Jim Combs said to WTVQ-TV. “That’s something you have to be very careful with, the younger they are, just so they understand.”
“When you’re talking elementary school age that’s a fine line.”
Fayette County Public Schools spokeswoman Lisa Deffendall said in a statement that the article and quiz were packaged content not created by the teacher, but she did not address the slanted coverage of police shootings.
“While we appreciate that some may believe the topic was too mature for fifth-graders, it is critical that our classrooms be safe places where students can discuss current events,” Deffendall said, mischaracterizing objections.
“Fayette County Public Schools is committed to helping students become civically engaged citizens who are wise consumers of digital media able to think critically about the world around them. That requires we address difficult topics and teach students to have civil conversations with people who have different points of view,” she said.
Clearly, Kentucky schools are all-in on the anti-police social justice nonsense and have no intention to quit shaping schoolchildren into BLM’s own image.
They’re spoon-feeding this garbage to young, impressionable children, warping their worldview while deepening racial tensions.
They are convincing kids that police officers are dangerous, which does nothing but set them up for contentious interactions with police in the future.
But worst of all, they want to perpetuate a victim mentality for black and minority kids that will cripple their chances at success — which is useful in creating Democratic voters, but tragic for instilling character.
There’s a reason teachers don’t want parents listening in on virtual classes, and it is because Kentucky schools aren’t alone in their systemic anti-police sentiment.
It is a cancer that has spread through powerful leftist teachers’ unions and has been fortified by common core which strips children of the ability to think for themselves and makes them ripe for the picking.
One hope for these endless lockdowns and virtual schoolrooms is that the tentacles of leftist race theory and anti-police rhetoric will be severed as parents become part of the learning day.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-04--President Trump on Nancy Pelosi Breaking COVID Rules for a Haircut: ‘Nancy Pelosi, Where’s the Mask?

President Trump on Nancy Pelosi Breaking COVID Rules for a Haircut: ‘Nancy Pelosi, Where’s the Mask?’ [VIDEO]

TRUMP : `` She must have treated that salon owner pretty badly .
She uses the salon and the salon @ @ @ @ @ salon turned her in . ''

EXCERPT:
TRUMP: “I watched Nancy Pelosi, 'You must wear your mask! You have to wear your mask! And we will keep every beauty salon closed in California and all over the country.' And then I see a picture, I say, 'Nancy Pelosi? Well, where's her mask?' And I'll tell you what, she must have treated that beauty salon on pretty badly. She uses the salon and the salon turned her in.
(Laughter)
The salon turned her in! I don't think I would have turned her in, I would have said, 'Well, you know, she's a customer. I got to take care of my customers, right?' But she made them open. And the salon turned her in, and the salon did business with her. How much do they hate Nancy Pelosi?”


thelibertydaily--2020-09-04--Rich White Leftists Encourage Black People to Loot Their Neighborhoods

Learn why private property is just a social construct for only 21 bucks .
Daniel Greenfield , a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center , is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism .
A hardcover copy of `` In Defense of Looting '' will run you 21 bucks at Amazon and 28 bucks at Barnes and Noble .
That ’ s just how capitalism works for the distribution and sales of a product from one of the biggest publishing companies in the world that ’ s part of the Lagardère empire .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ France pushing what Publishers Weekly called , “ a provocative , Marxist-informed defense of looting ” to Americans ?
Because it makes money .
Learn why private property is just a social construct for only 21 bucks .
`` In Defense of Looting '' quickly ended up a major topic of conversation on social media .
And that means Arnaud Lagardère , the head of the French empire that swallowed Little , Brown and Company , adds to his $ 220 million net worth and keeps the model he married , half his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at his country estate .
So what if a whole bunch of small businesses , many owned by immigrants and black people , get trashed and put out of business .
`` In Defense of Looting '' was published by Bold Type Books , a Lagardère subsidiary imprint in partnership with what used to be Nation Books .
The Nation , a hard lefty magazine , is partly owned by Katrina vanden Heuvel , the daughter of an MCA heiress who was worth over $ 38 million when she jumped out of her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Vicky Osterweil , the author of “ In Defense of Looting ” , who graduated magna cum laude from Cornell , where he tried to make his own movie , before moving to Brooklyn to live out the hipster dream of playing in a punk rock band while aspiring to become a novelist .
Two years later he was being profiled in the New York Times attending an Upper East Side party .
Such are the hobbies of the worthless dilettante brats of the New Left .
The son of a professor and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Boston , Willie , his original name joined the Park Slope Food Coop , and scribbled terrible movie reviews , “ capitalism is built on the bones of the witch , her magic the first threat against capitalist rationalization ” , followed by equally terrible leftist screeds for The Paris Review , Jacobin and The Nation .
In 2011 , he was in Barcelona , taking part in protests there as training for his work on Occupy Wall Street .
Fast forward to the present , Willie had married Sophie Lewis , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from Oxford , had translated “ Communism for Kids ” , and had her own book “ Full Surrogacy Now : Feminism Against Family ” , which attacked the existence of the family .
Willie , her new “ wusband ” , now appeared to be Vicky Osterweil .
The happy young white couple both had major books with radical Marxist premises .
Sophia was calling for the elimination of the family and Vicky was defending looting .
And the upscale couple was doing it in the name of destroying capitalism .
`` @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Family , '' The Nation headlined a review of her book .
All of this made marriage a little awkward , but there was nothing that couldn ’ t be overcome .
A splashy Vice profile mentions that at their wedding , instead of vows , the happy couple gave speeches disavowing the institution of marriage and the biological family .
And then they headed to Boston where Willie 's mother wanted a more traditional wedding .
You can disavow the institution of marriage , but you ’ re still going to get @ @ @ @ @ @ @ book attacking the existence of the biological family , but when your ‘ wusband ’ s mommy wants a traditional wedding she can invite her friends to , you drop the nonsense and go .
It ’ s unknown what Sophia ’ s parents , journalists who had given birth to her in Vienna and raised her in Switzerland and France , places that speak to her oppressed background , thought .
Sophia might be gay and Vicky might be transgender but they were a conventional enough couple living the hipster dream in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and touting a gift certificate to an antique shop that they had received as a wedding present .
The sort of thing you do when you ’ re trying to smash capitalism , and abolish the family along with private property .
Right after you get married and pick up something nice at the antique shop .
The Black Lives Matter riots and the looting trashed parts of West Philly , but it does n't seem to have done much to disturb their idyllic world of community gardens , social justice yoga studios @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if it did , unlike their proprietors , Vicky and Sophia can move on .
The ugly truth about Marxist capitalism-smashing hipsters is that they are the least exposed to the consequences of their theories .
When a third of Philly pharmacies were robbed in a coordinated campaign by gangs coming in from outside the city , it had a major impact on black senior citizens getting their prescriptions , but not on an upscale white hipster power couple .
Spending your twenties and thirties deconstructing everything is the luxury of the upper @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of people who don ’ t really have jobs or a family depending on them for support .
That ’ s why the deconstruction is fundamentally unserious .
After writing a book calling for the abolition of the family , Vicky and Sophia got married .
Vicky ’ s living in West Philly where the riots and the looting are going on , shopping for antiques , and writing a book in defense of looting .
As F. Scott Fitzgerald wrote in The Great Gatsby , `` They were careless people , Tom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness . ''
A generation of upscale leftists is smashing up everything while knowing that they can retreat to the pricey suburbs that spawned them , to their country estates and condos , while the chaos and destruction happen to someone else .
Tom might be calling himself Thomasina and Daisy might be calling herself a lesbian , but they ’ re still playing games and amusing themselves at other people ’ s expense in the vast carelessness of theoretical reasons for destroying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ article titled “ In Defense of Looting ” in 2014 during the Ferguson riots filled with 1619 Project style nonsense like `` American police forces evolved out of fugitive slave patrols '' , while insisting that , `` the idea of private property is just that : an idea . ''
Of course every idea is an idea .
Including the sacrosanct nature of human life and liberty .
Dismissing fundamental concepts on which your existence depends as mere ideas is a privilege .
Violence , disorder , and chaos can take away @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Leftists deconstruct everything until they realize how badly they need those ideas .
But it takes far longer for them to be affected by the destruction than the poorer and more vulnerable people whose lives have been turned upside down for a sensational new talking point at one of Katrina vanden Heuvel ’ s fashionable parties .
While countless small businesses have been destroyed , Amazon ’ s business model is booming .
The massive corporation , where many lefties will be shopping for copies of “ In Defense of Looting ” doubled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ % of the e-commerce market and when Black Lives Matter looters burn their way through neighborhoods , more retail moves away and goes online .
Small business owners decide that it ’ s better to be a third party seller for a massive corporation than to try and keep going during the lockdowns and race riots .
Amazon can make money from “ In Defense of Looting ” and from the actual looting .
The small businesses that Vicky Osterweil ridicules provide their owners with some measure of independence .
The looters turn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of massive corporate monopoly that Osterweil claims to hate , yet ultimately champions and makes his money from .
Osterweil preaches in defense of looting in the name of the black community .
But the death of small businesses hits black communities hardest .
Shopping online is a lot easier if you have a credit card or a checking account .
Portions of the black community have neither .
Wiping out street retail in urban areas not only guts neighborhoods , it turns retail into wealth privilege .
Upscale areas will still have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Matter riots die down .
But the poorer black areas hardest hit by them won ’ t .
The white leftists promoting looting will still have their quaint cafes , punk hair salons and social justice yoga studios that Vicky and Sophie rave about , they ’ ll also have local supermarkets like Whole Foods , owned by Amazon , groceries , restaurants , boutiques , coffee shops , and the rest of the hipster detritus of gentrification .
That ’ s because they have the money and spend the money to make @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is done , there will be burned out neighborhoods ripe for real estate speculators to move in , renovate , and peddle to the wealthy white hipsters who want to live there .
Promote enough looting and you too can cash in when the market is right .
There is more than one kind of looting .
There are the organized gangs smashing up Philly pharmacies and heading away in vans and trucks .
There ’ s the Soros DA who lets crime happen .
And there are the professional white activists who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the destruction of black neighborhoods to sell their books on Amazon .
While Vice lavishly promotes looting and Marxist deconstructionism as radical chic , its parent company is partly owned by Disney , a private equity firm , and Soros Fund Management .
The street looting is paralleled by an even more massive looting at the top with hipster Marxist deconstructionists as ideological foot soldiers in the trashing of America .
Some of the biggest social justice corporations in the country are funding the attacks on capitalism and the country .
Meanwhile in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stake in Amazon by 102 % .

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.
A hardcover copy of “In Defense of Looting” will run you 21 bucks at Amazon and 28 bucks at Barnes and Noble. That’s just how capitalism works for the distribution and sales of a product from one of the biggest publishing companies in the world that’s part of the Lagardère empire.
Why is the largest publishing company in France pushing what Publishers Weekly called, “a provocative, Marxist-informed defense of looting” to Americans? Because it makes money.
Learn why private property is just a social construct for only 21 bucks.
“In Defense of Looting” quickly ended up a major topic of conversation on social media.
And that means Arnaud Lagardère, the head of the French empire that swallowed Little, Brown and Company, adds to his $220 million net worth and keeps the model he married, half his age, in the style she expects at his country estate. So what if a whole bunch of small businesses, many owned by immigrants and black people, get trashed and put out of business.
“In Defense of Looting” was published by Bold Type Books, a Lagardère subsidiary imprint in partnership with what used to be Nation Books. The Nation, a hard lefty magazine, is partly owned by Katrina vanden Heuvel, the daughter of an MCA heiress who was worth over $38 million when she jumped out of her apartment window.
And then there’s Vicky Osterweil, the author of “In Defense of Looting”, who graduated magna cum laude from Cornell, where he tried to make his own movie, before moving to Brooklyn to live out the hipster dream of playing in a punk rock band while aspiring to become a novelist.
Two years later he was being profiled in the New York Times attending an Upper East Side party. Such are the hobbies of the worthless dilettante brats of the New Left.
The son of a professor and a producer from a wealthy suburb of Boston, Willie, his original name joined the Park Slope Food Coop, and scribbled terrible movie reviews, “capitalism is built on the bones of the witch, her magic the first threat against capitalist rationalization”, followed by equally terrible leftist screeds for The Paris Review, Jacobin and The Nation. In 2011, he was in Barcelona, taking part in protests there as training for his work on Occupy Wall Street.
Fast forward to the present, Willie had married Sophie Lewis, a British lesbian feminist who has two degrees from Oxford, had translated “Communism for Kids”, and had her own book “Full Surrogacy Now: Feminism Against Family”, which attacked the existence of the family. Willie, her new “wusband”, now appeared to be Vicky Osterweil.
The happy young white couple both had major books with radical Marxist premises.
Sophia was calling for the elimination of the family and Vicky was defending looting. And the upscale couple was doing it in the name of destroying capitalism.
“Want to Dismantle Capitalism? Abolish the Family,” The Nation headlined a review of her book.
All of this made marriage a little awkward, but there was nothing that couldn’t be overcome.
A splashy Vice profile mentions that at their wedding, instead of vows, the happy couple gave speeches disavowing the institution of marriage and the biological family.
And then they headed to Boston where Willie’s mother wanted a more traditional wedding.
You can disavow the institution of marriage, but you’re still going to get married. And you can write a book attacking the existence of the biological family, but when your ‘wusband’s mommy wants a traditional wedding she can invite her friends to, you drop the nonsense and go.
It’s unknown what Sophia’s parents, journalists who had given birth to her in Vienna and raised her in Switzerland and France, places that speak to her oppressed background, thought.
Sophia might be gay and Vicky might be transgender but they were a conventional enough couple living the hipster dream in a gentrified area of West Philly, and touting a gift certificate to an antique shop that they had received as a wedding present. The sort of thing you do when you’re trying to smash capitalism, and abolish the family along with private property.
Right after you get married and pick up something nice at the antique shop.
The Black Lives Matter riots and the looting trashed parts of West Philly, but it doesn’t seem to have done much to disturb their idyllic world of community gardens, social justice yoga studios and punk hair salons. And even if it did, unlike their proprietors, Vicky and Sophia can move on.
The ugly truth about Marxist capitalism-smashing hipsters is that they are the least exposed to the consequences of their theories. When a third of Philly pharmacies were robbed in a coordinated campaign by gangs coming in from outside the city, it had a major impact on black senior citizens getting their prescriptions, but not on an upscale white hipster power couple.
Spending your twenties and thirties deconstructing everything is the luxury of the upper class. It’s the hobby of people who don’t really have jobs or a family depending on them for support. That’s why the deconstruction is fundamentally unserious. After writing a book calling for the abolition of the family, Vicky and Sophia got married. Vicky’s living in West Philly where the riots and the looting are going on, shopping for antiques, and writing a book in defense of looting.
As F. Scott Fitzgerald wrote in The Great Gatsby, “They were careless people, Tom and Daisy—they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness.”
A generation of upscale leftists is smashing up everything while knowing that they can retreat to the pricey suburbs that spawned them, to their country estates and condos, while the chaos and destruction happen to someone else. Tom might be calling himself Thomasina and Daisy might be calling herself a lesbian, but they’re still playing games and amusing themselves at other people’s expense in the vast carelessness of theoretical reasons for destroying it all.
Willie/Vicky originally wrote an article titled “In Defense of Looting” in 2014 during the Ferguson riots filled with 1619 Project style nonsense like “American police forces evolved out of fugitive slave patrols”, while insisting that, “the idea of private property is just that: an idea.”
Of course every idea is an idea. Including the sacrosanct nature of human life and liberty.
Dismissing fundamental concepts on which your existence depends as mere ideas is a privilege. Violence, disorder, and chaos can take away that privilege and show their value.
Leftists deconstruct everything until they realize how badly they need those ideas. But it takes far longer for them to be affected by the destruction than the poorer and more vulnerable people whose lives have been turned upside down for a sensational new talking point at one of Katrina vanden Heuvel’s fashionable parties.
While countless small businesses have been destroyed, Amazon’s business model is booming.
The massive corporation, where many lefties will be shopping for copies of “In Defense of Looting” doubled its quarterly profits. Amazon controls 38% of the e-commerce market and when Black Lives Matter looters burn their way through neighborhoods, more retail moves away and goes online. Small business owners decide that it’s better to be a third party seller for a massive corporation than to try and keep going during the lockdowns and race riots.
Amazon can make money from “In Defense of Looting” and from the actual looting.
The small businesses that Vicky Osterweil ridicules provide their owners with some measure of independence. The looters turn them into subjects of the same sort of massive corporate monopoly that Osterweil claims to hate, yet ultimately champions and makes his money from.
Osterweil preaches in defense of looting in the name of the black community. But the death of small businesses hits black communities hardest. Shopping online is a lot easier if you have a credit card or a checking account. Portions of the black community have neither. Wiping out street retail in urban areas not only guts neighborhoods, it turns retail into wealth privilege.
Upscale areas will still have street level retail once the Black Lives Matter riots die down. But the poorer black areas hardest hit by them won’t. The white leftists promoting looting will still have their quaint cafes, punk hair salons and social justice yoga studios that Vicky and Sophie rave about, they’ll also have local supermarkets like Whole Foods, owned by Amazon, groceries, restaurants, boutiques, coffee shops, and the rest of the hipster detritus of gentrification.
That’s because they have the money and spend the money to make street retail profitable.
When the rioting is done, there will be burned out neighborhoods ripe for real estate speculators to move in, renovate, and peddle to the wealthy white hipsters who want to live there.
Promote enough looting and you too can cash in when the market is right.
There is more than one kind of looting. There are the organized gangs smashing up Philly pharmacies and heading away in vans and trucks. There’s the Soros DA who lets crime happen. And there are the professional white activists who keep shouting Black Lives Matter while promoting the destruction of black neighborhoods to sell their books on Amazon.
While Vice lavishly promotes looting and Marxist deconstructionism as radical chic, its parent company is partly owned by Disney, a private equity firm, and Soros Fund Management.
The street looting is paralleled by an even more massive looting at the top with hipster Marxist deconstructionists as ideological foot soldiers in the trashing of America. Some of the biggest social justice corporations in the country are funding the attacks on capitalism and the country.
Meanwhile in August, Soros Fund Management raised its stake in Amazon by 102%.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-04--Medical Tyranny: CDC Wants to Own Your Property Now

“ America will never be a socialist nation , ” President Trump proudly proclaimed in his 2019 State of the Union Address .
Sadly , as each day of this coronavirus pandemic wears on , these words seem to grow less and less prophetic .
Just as we think we ’ ve reached our capacity for government intrusions into the daily lives of Americans , we ’ re reminded that we may not have even scraped the surface .
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) has now asserted its jurisdiction over… residential leases .
Yes , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is moving to end evictions for the remainder of the calendar year .
This is a horrifying development for a wide variety of reasons .
As Rep. Thomas Massie ( R-Ky. ) points out , this is a gross violation of property rights .
Landlords rent out their property and receive compensation in return .
This is a fairly basic reality for almost any good or service .
For the federal government to come in and prohibit landlords from being able to remove people from their own property ( especially if they are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an effective seizure of said property .
It is unacceptable to force anyone to give up their property for free .
Beyond this , the legal authority is shaky , at best .
Massie , along with Sens .
Pat Toomey ( R-Pa. ) and Rand Paul ( R-Ky. ) noted that they can not find any legal basis upon which the CDC can implement and enforce such a policy .
Toomey also elaborated that this will likely set the stage for even more egregious violations of property rights in the name of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ What future administration , what future president , certainly what future Democratic president is going to want to be accused of being less generous than Donald Trump ? ''
asks Toomey .
`` Are we to expect that the standard response of the government to an economic downturn is an eviction moratorium ?
We 've never done that before . ''
Experts also warn that the expiration of this moratorium at the end of the calendar year will set our nation on the glidepath to a catastrophic housing crisis come 2021 .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ collecting rent or will create a backlog that will need to be collected in January .
At that point , a good many people unwilling or unable to pay will be evicted .
Lastly , this eviction moratorium creates a further incentive for states and localities to keep their economies shut down .
We should be incentivizing businesses to re-open so people can go to work , make a living , and be able to pay their rent .
Instead , this eviction moratorium infringes on property rights so that the cult of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ country can continue to keep almost every aspect of American life under wraps .
If we are serious about ensuring that America is never a socialist nation and protecting the rule of law , politicians from both sides of the aisle need to forcefully condemn this and take action .
Otherwise , we slide a little further down the slippery slope towards socialized rule .
That is an outcome our nation can not afford .

“America will never be a socialist nation,” President Trump proudly proclaimed in his 2019 State of the Union Address. Sadly, as each day of this coronavirus pandemic wears on, these words seem to grow less and less prophetic. Just as we think we’ve reached our capacity for government intrusions into the daily lives of Americans, we’re reminded that we may not have even scraped the surface.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has now asserted its jurisdiction over… residential leases. Yes, you read that correctly. The agency is moving to end evictions for the remainder of the calendar year. This is a horrifying development for a wide variety of reasons.
CDC inserting itself into private rental contracts, effectively transferring control of private property from the lawful owner to the renter, is possibly the most socialist action our government has taken in decades… and without an act of Congress!https://t.co/phLwFIYWlO — Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) September 2, 2020
As Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) points out, this is a gross violation of property rights. Landlords rent out their property and receive compensation in return. This is a fairly basic reality for almost any good or service. For the federal government to come in and prohibit landlords from being able to remove people from their own property (especially if they are unable to pay for it) is an effective seizure of said property. It is unacceptable to force anyone to give up their property for free.
Beyond this, the legal authority is [shaky](https://reason.com/2020/09/03/pat-toomey-on-cdc-eviction-moratorium-the-legal-authority-is-a-real-stretch/), at best. Massie, along with Sens. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.) noted that they cannot find any legal basis upon which the CDC can implement and enforce such a policy.
Toomey also elaborated that this will likely set the stage for even more egregious violations of property rights in the name of social welfare in the future, “What future administration, what future president, certainly what future Democratic president is going to want to be accused of being less generous than Donald Trump?” asks Toomey. “Are we to expect that the standard response of the government to an economic downturn is an eviction moratorium? We’ve never done that before.”
Experts also [warn](https://thehill.com/policy/finance/housing/514898-trump-eviction-ban-tests-limits-of-cdc-authority) that the expiration of this moratorium at the end of the calendar year will set our nation on the glidepath to a catastrophic housing crisis come 2021. The moratorium will either eventually prevent landlords from collecting rent or will create a backlog that will need to be collected in January. At that point, a good many people unwilling or unable to pay will be evicted.
Lastly, this eviction moratorium creates a further incentive for states and localities to keep their economies shut down. We should be incentivizing businesses to re-open so people can go to work, make a living, and be able to pay their rent. Instead, this eviction moratorium infringes on property rights so that the cult of fear driving the pandemic response in this country can continue to keep almost every aspect of American life under wraps.
If we are serious about ensuring that America is never a socialist nation and protecting the rule of law, politicians from both sides of the aisle need to forcefully condemn this and take action. Otherwise, we slide a little further down the slippery slope towards socialized rule. That is an outcome our nation cannot afford.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-04--Feel Good Story of the Day: Antifa Goon Who Assassinated Trump Supporter Shot Dead by Federal Author

Feel Good Story of the Day: Antifa Goon Who Assassinated Trump Supporter Shot Dead by Federal Authorities

Antifa supporter Michael Forest Reinoehl was killed Thursday night when federal authorities attempted to arrest him in connection with the fatal shooting of a conservative activist in Portland over the weekend , according to multiple media reports .
Three law enforcement officials told The New York Times that Reinoehl was killed in Lacey , Wash. , after a federal task force attempted to arrest him in connection to the shooting of Aaron Danielson , a member of the conservative group Patriot Prayer .
The Washington Post reported that a task force officer shot Reinoehl as he pulled a firearm while @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Danielson , 39 , died after sustaining a gunshot wound to the chest in Portland on Saturday night .
He was with a group of Trump supporters who showed up at Black Lives Matter protests held in Portland .
Reinoehl , 48 , attended several Black Lives Matter protests in recent months , according to his Instagram page .
He was reported to be a person of interest in the Danielson shooting , though authorities previously refused to confirm he was a suspect in the case .
The Times reported Thursday that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the shooting .
( RELATED : ‘ I Had No Choice ’ : Antifa Supporter Linked To Shooting Of Trump Supporter Breaks Silence ) Reinoehl appeared in a VICE News interview that aired minutes before The Times reported his death on Thursday .
Reinoehl did not directly admit to shooting Danielson in the interview , though he said he was “ confident that I didn ’ t hit anyone innocent.
” He suggested that he was protecting a friend prior to the shooting .
“ I had no choice .
I mean…I had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there and watched them kill a friend of mine of color .
But I wasn ’ t going to do that , ” Reinoehl said in the interview .
Reinoehl expressed support for Antifa , a loosely organized left-wing group , in several social media posts , while comparing protests over police brutality to war .
( RELATED : ‘ I Am Antifa ’ : Antifa Supporter Sarah Iannarone Could Be Portland ’ s Next Mayor ) Reinoehl wrote of protests that , “ like all wars there will be casualties ” Reinoehl @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with illegal possession of a loaded firearm , including at an incident at a protest in Portland on July 5 .
The Portland police department posted a photo on its Twitter account of Reinoehl being apprehended while a gun laid on the ground next to him .
A spokesman for the department told The Daily Caller News Foundation earlier on Thursday that Reinoehl was issued a notice to appear for the gun charge the day of the incident , but didn ’ t show up .
The city of Portland rejected a public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the incident , citing an ongoing investigation .
Reinoehl was cited on June 8 with illegal gun possession after he was pulled over driving 111-mph on Interstate 84 near Portland .
Reinoehl ’ s 11-year-old daughter was in the vehicle at the time , leading to a reckless endangerment charge .
The Portland police department did not immediately respond to a request for comment .
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience .
For licensing opportunities of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dailycallernewsfoundation.org .

Antifa supporter Michael Forest Reinoehl was killed Thursday night when federal authorities attempted to arrest him in connection with the fatal shooting of a conservative activist in Portland over the weekend, according to multiple media reports.
Three law enforcement officials told The New York Times that Reinoehl was killed in Lacey, Wash., after a federal task force attempted to arrest him in connection to the shooting of Aaron Danielson, a member of the conservative group Patriot Prayer.
The Washington Post reported that a task force officer shot Reinoehl as he pulled a firearm while authorities attempted to take him into custody.
Danielson, 39, died after sustaining a gunshot wound to the chest in Portland on Saturday night. He was with a group of Trump supporters who showed up at Black Lives Matter protests held in Portland.
Reinoehl, 48, attended several Black Lives Matter protests in recent months, according to his Instagram page. He was reported to be a person of interest in the Danielson shooting, though authorities previously refused to confirm he was a suspect in the case.
The Times reported Thursday that Reinoehl was being investigated in connection with the shooting. (RELATED: ‘I Had No Choice’: Antifa Supporter Linked To Shooting Of Trump Supporter Breaks Silence)
Reinoehl appeared in a VICE News interview that aired minutes before The Times reported his death on Thursday.
Reinoehl did not directly admit to shooting Danielson in the interview, though he said he was “confident that I didn’t hit anyone innocent.” He suggested that he was protecting a friend prior to the shooting.
WATCH:
“I had no choice. I mean…I had a choice. I could have sat there and watched them kill a friend of mine of color. But I wasn’t going to do that,” Reinoehl said in the interview.
Reinoehl expressed support for Antifa, a loosely organized left-wing group, in several social media posts, while comparing protests over police brutality to war. (RELATED: ‘I Am Antifa’: Antifa Supporter Sarah Iannarone Could Be Portland’s Next Mayor)
“I am 100% ANTIFA all the way!” he wrote in a post on Instagram on June 16. “We do not want violence but we will not run from it either!”
Reinoehl wrote of protests that, “like all wars there will be casualties”
Reinoehl had been charged twice in recent months with illegal possession of a loaded firearm, including at an incident at a protest in Portland on July 5.
The Portland police department posted a photo on its Twitter account of Reinoehl being apprehended while a gun laid on the ground next to him.
Officers arrested a male at SW Broadway and Main St. who had a loaded firearm on his person. He fought with offices during the arrest. pic.twitter.com/RXgYHnB5ue — Portland Police (@PortlandPolice) July 5, 2020
A spokesman for the department told The Daily Caller News Foundation earlier on Thursday that Reinoehl was issued a notice to appear for the gun charge the day of the incident, but didn’t show up.
The city of Portland rejected a public records request for a police report of the incident, citing an ongoing investigation.
Reinoehl was cited on June 8 with illegal gun possession after he was pulled over driving 111-mph on Interstate 84 near Portland. Reinoehl’s 11-year-old daughter was in the vehicle at the time, leading to a reckless endangerment charge.
The Portland police department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.