thelibertydaily--2020-03-05--Steve Deace: We Won’t Survive the Socialist Onslaught Without Core Principles Set in Liberty

Steve Deace was on the Glenn Beck program on Wednesday analysing the Super Tuesday results .
Towards the end of the interview he emphasised a very important point .
The turmoil on the left clouds the fact that they have a core set of principles .
It ’ s just a matter of whether they are overt or covert socialists .
The larger point is that they have pushed the Overton Window so far to the left that it ’ s about to fall off of a cliff .
Meanwhile , we on the pro-liberty right are just offering ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hoc policies without any real guiding principles .
Mr. Deace made the point that history is won by the side with strong convictions .
For all of their faults , the nation ’ s socialist left at least has these convictions .
They have never worked and will never work , but that ’ s part of the threat .
History has shown there is nothing more dangerous than ideologues who will use any means necessary to maintain their power and get their non-functional monstrosity to work .
Such people have oppressed nations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ murdered millions to force collectivism to down our throats .
While we on the pro-liberty right have a strong set of beliefs , we tend to keep them in the background .
We tend to focus on day-to-day practical matters instead of liberty and limited government .
Such guiding principles inform as to who we are , but we have been bullied by the left into silence on the subject .
The authoritarian left can fill in whatever they want in the resulting vacuum , to the point of claiming they favor liberty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ .
We know that collectivist control is the death of liberty , but when we are silent on the subject , the left can fill in the blanks with whatever they want .
The same holds true for their supposed advocacy of ‘ progress ’ with their other false label ‘ progressive ’ .
Some leftists have the false notion that their ideas are less than 200 years old , when they are really 2,400 years old .
Thus they can pretend to be new ideas for the furtherance of ‘ progress @ @ @ @ @ @ @ form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
Steve Deace was on the Glenn Beck program on Wednesday analysing the Super Tuesday results. Towards the end of the interview he emphasised a very important point. The turmoil on the left clouds the fact that they have a core set of principles. It’s just a matter of whether they are overt or covert socialists.
The larger point is that they have pushed the Overton Window so far to the left that it’s about to fall off of a cliff. Meanwhile, we on the pro-liberty right are just offering ‘goulash’, a mishmash of ad hoc policies without any real guiding principles. Mr. Deace made the point that history is won by the side with strong convictions.
For all of their faults, the nation’s socialist left at least has these convictions. They have never worked and will never work, but that’s part of the threat.
History has shown there is nothing more dangerous than ideologues who will use any means necessary to maintain their power and get their non-functional monstrosity to work. Such people have oppressed nations, thrown thousands into mental institutions and murdered millions to force collectivism to down our throats.
Pro-liberty principles are superior to collectivist control schemes
While we on the pro-liberty right have a strong set of beliefs, we tend to keep them in the background. We tend to focus on day-to-day practical matters instead of liberty and limited government. Such guiding principles inform as to who we are, but we have been bullied by the left into silence on the subject.
The authoritarian left can fill in whatever they want in the resulting vacuum, to the point of claiming they favor liberty with the false label of ‘liberal’. We know that collectivist control is the death of liberty, but when we are silent on the subject, the left can fill in the blanks with whatever they want.
The same holds true for their supposed advocacy of ‘progress’ with their other false label ‘progressive’. Some leftists have the false notion that their ideas are less than 200 years old, when they are really 2,400 years old. Thus they can pretend to be new ideas for the furtherance of ‘progress’.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


thelibertydaily--2020-03-05--GOP Congressman Andy Biggs Introduces Resolution Condemning Chucky Schemer’s Threats Against Supreme

GOP Congressman Andy Biggs Introduces Resolution Condemning Chucky Schemer’s Threats Against Supreme Court Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is lucky Capitol Hill is generally more genteel than other groups in the way they handle internal challenges .
His unhinged comments at an abortion rally in front of the Supreme Court yesterday were so troubling , one might expect him to be fired if he had a real job .
But he ’ s a Senator , so the best we can expect until his next election is a sharp rebuke from Congress or the Senate , and that ’ s exactly what House Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Biggs brought forth today .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Senator for making threats directed specifically at Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh regarding the case of the new Louisiana abortion law .
It would require those performing abortions to have admitting privileges at a local hospital , thereby assuring women who seek abortions will have proper medical care through the procedure as well as a safety net should the procedure go wrong .
Biggs also Tweeted a video of his concerns about the Senator ’ s remarks .
The outrage from the right is justified and unavoidable ; one can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Court rulings , not even a sitting Senator .
But this wasn ’ t just a random rant by Schumer .
This was a calculated opening blow that telegraphs the Democrats ’ election strategy .
They ’ re going to make abortion access one of their top selling points , claiming President Trump will put in more Supreme Court Justices who will overturn Roe v. Wade unless he ’ s voted out of office .
Even though it ’ s all a trap , conservatives have no choice but to take the bait @ @ @ @ @ @ @ issue for Republicans despite the Democrats ’ attempts to push abortion “ access ” to the far left extremes that most Americans do not want .
Nevertheless , doing or saying nothing about Schumer ’ s threat would not have behooved conservatives even though springing his trap doesn ’ t help them either .
This is why it ’ s so important for pro-lifers to become more aggressive—in a peaceful and non-violent manner—as we educate the masses about the realities of abortion .
We have the truth on our side , but it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ simply don ’ t want to hear .
The consensus in the murky middle is accepting the status quo .
They generally do not want to overturn Roe v. Wade but they also do not want laws that allow for unrestricted abortions-on-demand .
The time may come in the future when it ’ s possible to vote Chuck Schumer out of office .
In the meantime , calling him out for his irresponsible rhetoric , as Andy Biggs and other conservatives are doing , is the best best punishment we have for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is lucky Capitol Hill is generally more genteel than other groups in the way they handle internal challenges. His unhinged comments at an abortion rally in front of the Supreme Court yesterday were so troubling, one might expect him to be fired if he had a real job. But he’s a Senator, so the best we can expect until his next election is a sharp rebuke from Congress or the Senate, and that’s exactly what House Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Biggs brought forth today.
The conservative Congressman wants Congress to rebuke the Senator for making threats directed specifically at Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh regarding the case of the new Louisiana abortion law. It would require those performing abortions to have admitting privileges at a local hospital, thereby assuring women who seek abortions will have proper medical care through the procedure as well as a safety net should the procedure go wrong. Biggs also Tweeted a video of his concerns about the Senator’s remarks.
I introduced today’s resolution to condemn Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer because his threatening rhetoric has NO place in the U.S. Congress – especially from a leader of one of our parties. I hope my colleagues will join me on this resolution. pic.twitter.com/pA2zU5BEQv — Rep Andy Biggs (@RepAndyBiggsAZ) March 5, 2020
The outrage from the right is justified and unavoidable; one cannot make threats over policies or Supreme Court rulings, not even a sitting Senator. But this wasn’t just a random rant by Schumer. This was a calculated opening blow that telegraphs the Democrats’ election strategy. They’re going to make abortion access one of their top selling points, claiming President Trump will put in more Supreme Court Justices who will overturn Roe v. Wade unless he’s voted out of office.
Even though it’s all a trap, conservatives have no choice but to take the bait. Abortion is not currently a wining issue for Republicans despite the Democrats’ attempts to push abortion “access” to the far left extremes that most Americans do not want. Nevertheless, doing or saying nothing about Schumer’s threat would not have behooved conservatives even though springing his trap doesn’t help them either.
This is why it’s so important for pro-lifers to become more aggressive—in a peaceful and non-violent manner—as we educate the masses about the realities of abortion. We have the truth on our side, but it’s a truth that most Americans simply don’t want to hear. The consensus in the murky middle is accepting the status quo. They generally do not want to overturn Roe v. Wade but they also do not want laws that allow for unrestricted abortions-on-demand.
The time may come in the future when it’s possible to vote Chuck Schumer out of office. In the meantime, calling him out for his irresponsible rhetoric, as Andy Biggs and other conservatives are doing, is the best best punishment we have for the Senator.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


thelibertydaily--2020-03-05--James Woods: Chuck Schumer’s ‘Thuggish Threats’ are a Signal to the ‘Democrat Mob’ of ‘Antifa Hoodlu

James Woods: Chuck Schumer’s ‘Thuggish Threats’ are a Signal to the ‘Democrat Mob’ of ‘Antifa Hoodlums’ to ‘Take Up Arms’

When Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer made threats to Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh yesterday , it was for purely political reasons .
It ’ s an election ploy , to be specific , that sets the stage for the next strategy by Democrats to turn the abortion issue into one of the big fights ahead of November .
But in doing so , he has also set the stage for violence a la Antifa .
When one powerful person sets a target , they ’ re responsible for whoever fires upon it .
Actor James Woods @ @ @ @ @ @ @ making ambiguous threats and radical supporters taking action as a result .
He even compared the way Schumer acted yesterday to past actions and rhetoric by Senator Bernie Sanders that drove a supporter to try to kill Republican Congressmen in 2017 .
Antifa may not answer to Chuck Schumer , but radical abortion activists have been known to use Antifa-style militant techniques to fight pro-life laws and activists .
They view the defense of abortion access with religious vigor , claiming a woman ’ s right to kill an unborn baby supersedes any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This is the biggest point of contention between pro-lifers and pro-abortionists .
Who has rights over what ?
The Senator ’ s words were irresponsible , but it ’ s worse than that .
They presuppose a battle that has the potential to turn violent despite relatively peaceful demonstrations from both sides in the recent past .
If we go back further , we will see that this issue does promote violence from both sides , but that violence has been abated in recent years .
Schumer ’ s threats can prompt @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Justices in the crosshairs .
Many conservatives have been calling out Schumer for his threats , but James Woods gave us a reminder of the potential for violence when rhetoric for political purposes is warped by radicals .
Schumer is stoking violence in an effort to win an election .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short @ @ @ @ @ @ @ please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
When Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer made threats to Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh yesterday, it was for purely political reasons. It’s an election ploy, to be specific, that sets the stage for the next strategy by Democrats to turn the abortion issue into one of the big fights ahead of November. But in doing so, he has also set the stage for violence a la Antifa. When one powerful person sets a target, they’re responsible for whoever fires upon it.
Actor James Woods made the correlation between politicians like Schumer making ambiguous threats and radical supporters taking action as a result. He even compared the way Schumer acted yesterday to past actions and rhetoric by Senator Bernie Sanders that drove a supporter to try to kill Republican Congressmen in 2017.
Schumer and the #DemocratMob have a nice arrangement: he makes these thuggish threats, the #Antifa hoodlums take up arms. This is how @SteveScalise was almost murdered by a #BernieBro. It’s astonishing that the Senate Democrat leader would threaten Justices of the Supreme Court. https://t.co/xZgRJ3KkwV — James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) March 5, 2020
Antifa may not answer to Chuck Schumer, but radical abortion activists have been known to use Antifa-style militant techniques to fight pro-life laws and activists. They view the defense of abortion access with religious vigor, claiming a woman’s right to kill an unborn baby supersedes any perceived rights of the baby inside her. This is the biggest point of contention between pro-lifers and pro-abortionists. Who has rights over what?
The Senator’s words were irresponsible, but it’s worse than that. They presuppose a battle that has the potential to turn violent despite relatively peaceful demonstrations from both sides in the recent past. If we go back further, we will see that this issue does promote violence from both sides, but that violence has been abated in recent years. Schumer’s threats can prompt a return to violence with Supreme Court Justices in the crosshairs.
Many conservatives have been calling out Schumer for his threats, but James Woods gave us a reminder of the potential for violence when rhetoric for political purposes is warped by radicals. Schumer is stoking violence in an effort to win an election.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


thelibertydaily--2020-03-06--Beloved 1927 Ford Model A Roadster Stolen Five Days After 75-Year-Old Navy Veteran Passes Away

The Puget Sound Auto Theft Task Force needs your help to right a wrong .
Someone stole Ron Harrison 's black 1927 Ford Model A Roadster named 'Windy ' .
It was taken from the Navy Veteran 's garage on East 46th Street in Tacoma five days after he died at the age of 75 .
On Feb. 23 , his brothers discovered that it had been taken '' My younger brother came by and found the front door open and the garage wide open and the car was gone .
This is a car my brother Ron had for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ford Model A Coupe , completely restored with a nice hot rod engine and he got lots of awards for , trophies .
There 's probably 15 trophies in the garage right now that he had sort of set aside so any way to get it back would be great because everybody in the family loved it , '' said Phil Harrison .
A newspaper photo from 1990 shows 'Windy ' with flames on her side but Harrision had since painted the roadster all black .
If you know where officers can find @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Theft Task Force on their Facebook page or submit a tip to Crime Stoppers of Tacoma Pierce County at http : //www.P3Tips.com or through the P3 Tips App on your cell phone .

The Puget Sound Auto Theft Task Force needs your help to right a wrong. Someone stole Ron Harrison's black 1927 Ford Model A Roadster named 'Windy'. It was taken from the Navy Veteran's garage on East 46th Street in Tacoma five days after he died at the age of 75. On Feb. 23, his brothers discovered that it had been taken
"My younger brother came by and found the front door open and the garage wide open and the car was gone. This is a car my brother Ron had for 50 years. It's a '27 Ford Model A Coupe, completely restored with a nice hot rod engine and he got lots of awards for, trophies. There's probably 15 trophies in the garage right now that he had sort of set aside so any way to get it back would be great because everybody in the family loved it," said Phil Harrison.
A newspaper photo from 1990 shows 'Windy' with flames on her side but Harrision had since painted the roadster all black.
If you know where officers can find it, message the Puget Sound Auto Theft Task Force on their Facebook page or submit a tip to Crime Stoppers of Tacoma Pierce County at www.P3Tips.com or through the P3 Tips App on your cell phone.


thelibertydaily--2020-03-06--Tokyo Olympics Hold Test Event Without Fans, With No Top Athletes

The recent outbreak of the coronavirus has forced them to rearrange or postpone several .
But they allowed a sport climbing event on Friday to go ahead , with a few restrictions : no fans and no top athletes .
Instead they used amateurs to test the climbing facility .
Almost all sports events and large gatherings have been shut down in Japan .
Preseason baseball is being played without fans , the soccer J-League is suspended until March 18 , and a spring sumo event will be contested in an empty arena .
Schools are also closed across the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ local organizers say the Olympics will open as scheduled on July 24 .
The Paralympics are set for Aug. 25 .
Virologists , however , say it 's impossible to tell if the spreading virus will allow that to happen , and a cancellation or a postponement are possible .
Twelve deaths in Japan have been attributed to the virus .
China is reporting more than 3,000 deaths from the virus , and still has more than 80 % of the world cases , though outbreaks are surging in Italy , Iran , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reading the Dayton Daily News and for supporting local journalism .
Subscribers : log in for access to your daily ePaper and premium newsletters .
Thank you for supporting in-depth local journalism with your subscription to the Dayton Daily News .
Get more news when you want it with email newsletters just for subscribers .
Sign up here .

logo_ddn_tag_Site JN with Tagline logo-sns_tag_Site
Our apologies, unfortunately our website is currently unavailable in most European countries due to GDPR rules.


thelibertydaily--2020-03-06--It’s Time for the Shadow Party’s Godfather to Face Justice: Deport George Soros as a Nazi Collaborat

It’s Time for the Shadow Party’s Godfather to Face Justice: Deport George Soros as a Nazi Collaborator [VIDEO]

It ’ s time for the Shadow Party ’ s Godfather to face justice .
Subscribe to the Glazov Gang @ @ @ @ @ follow us on Twitter : @ JamieGlazov .
[ Order David Horowitz 's The Shadow @ @ @ @ @ This new Glazov Gang episode features Daniel Greenfield , a Shillman Fellow at the Freedom @ @ @ @ @ Point at Frontpagemag.com .
Daniel discusses Deport Soros as a Nazi Collaborator , revealing why @ @ @ @ @ the Shadow Party ’ s Godfather to face justice .
And make sure to also @ @ @ @ @ on Battling Anti-Semitism below : Part I : Diane Bederman on The “ Israeli Apartheid @ @ @ @ @ the real perpetrators of apartheid ?
Part 2 : Diane Bederman on Nazism and Islam @ @ @ @ @ 6 : Dr. Jason Hill : Jewish People – The Creators of Time … .
@ @ @ @ @ Zionism .

[Order ‘David Horowitz’s The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Sixties Radicals Seized Control of the Democratic Party’: CLICK HERE.]
Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel and follow us on Instagram: @JamieGlazov, Parler: @JamieGlazov and Twitter: @JamieGlazov.
With Fox News’ show Outnumbered recently stifling Newt Gingrich’s effort to tell the truth about George Soros funding the riots in America’s streets, Frontpagemag editors have deemed it vital to run the special Glazov Gang episode in which Shillman Fellow Daniel Greenfield discusses Deport Soros as a Nazi Collaborator, revealing why It’s time for the Shadow Party’s Godfather to face justice.
Don’t miss it!
And make sure to watch our 2-Part Special with Daniel on Cuomo, De Blasio Go After Jewish Weddings and Can a Devout Jew Be a Leftist?
[1] Cuomo, De Blasio Go After Jewish Weddings — while they simultaneously cheer Black Lives Matter Riots.
[2] Can a Devout Jew Be a Leftist?
Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel and follow us on Instagram: @JamieGlazov, Parler: @JamieGlazov and Twitter: @JamieGlazov.


thelibertydaily--2020-03-06--Comprehensive Immigration Reform Should be Renamed the “Overwhelm America Act”

How Sanders and radical Dems weaponize compassion to destroy America .
We must never lose sight of the fact that Bernie Sanders is a pro-communist candidate who has called for a “ Political Revolution ” in America .
He must be taken at his word .
Sanders steadfastly lauds Cuba ’ s Castro for providing health care and education for Cubans , blithely ignoring the barbaric brutality of the Cuban communist government that has caused many Cubans to flee Cuba by perilously taking to the sea on virtually anything that floats .
Sanders also ignores the actual collusion between Castro @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the brink of a nuclear World War III in October 1962 when Castro welcomed nuclear-tipped Russian missiles that could have struck cities across the east coast of the United States including Washington , DC and New York .
Bernie has also expressed similar sentiments about former Nicaraguan communist and totalitarian Sandinista leader , Daniel Ortega .
It is beyond disturbing and very telling , that Sanders , a candidate for the U.S. presidency , would hold such anti-American foreign leaders in high esteem .
My dad used to tell me that if you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take away their money .
It is my belief that Bernie Sanders plans to achieve a total revolution in America through passage of Comprehensive Immigration Reform coupled with his off the charts costly programs to provide for everyone in the United States , not just citizens of the United States with “ Medicare for all , ” free college and a number of other such expensive programs that would crash our systems .
Not long ago , Bernie was clear about his opposition to Comprehensive Immigration Reform because of the harm it would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ American workers .
Now he has come to not only embrace such dangerous legislation , but essentially end immigration law enforcement .
Many of his colleagues in the radicalized Democratic Party are in agreement with him .
Comprehensive Immigration Reform would also undermine public safety and national security .
This aspect of Comprehensive Immigration Reform was the focus of my June 22 , 2007 Op-Ed for the Washington Times , Immigration bill a ‘ No Go ’ wherein I suggested that the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act should be renamed the “ Terrorist Assistance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be no way to interview , let alone conduct field investigations , to verify the information provided in the applications of the unknown millions of illegal aliens who would apply to participate in this wrong-headed program .
Remember , these are aliens who entered the U.S. without inspection so that their actual identities and entry data would be unknown and unknowable .
On January 19 , 2020 Buzz Feed News published a report , “ He Has Made Wild Shifts ” : How Bernie Sanders Has Changed His Approach To Immigration that began @ @ @ @ @ @ @ joined the Senate , he and his allies in the labor movement took on a big target : a new comprehensive immigration reform bill .
`` I believe we have very serious immigration problems in this country , '' Sanders said during a 2007 press event , with AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka behind him .
`` I think as you 've heard today , sanctions against employers who employ illegal immigrants is virtually nonexistent .
Our border is very porous .
`` “ And I think at a time when the middle class @ @ @ @ @ @ @ need is to bring over in a period of years , millions of people into this country who are prepared to lower wages for American workers , ” The key question we must consider is , “ How many aliens would be granted lawful status in the United States if our government was to pass this dangerous legislation ?
” For more than a decade we have been told by various agencies that there are approximately 11 million illegal aliens residing in the United States .
However , that number is likely way @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Yale University ’ s website , Yale Insights published a report , Yale Study Finds Twice as Many Undocumented Immigrants as Previous Estimates that began with this excerpt : Immigration is the focus of fierce political and policy debate in the United States .
Among the most contentious issues is how the country should address undocumented immigrants .
Like a tornado that won ’ t dissipate , arguments have spun around and around for years .
At the center lies a fairly stable and largely unquestioned number : 11.3 million undocumented immigrants residing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by three Yale-affiliated researchers suggests all the perceptions and arguments based on that number may have a faulty foundation ; the actual population of undocumented immigrants residing in the country is much larger than that , perhaps twice as high , and has been underestimated for decades .
Using mathematical modeling on a range of demographic and immigration operations data , the researchers estimate there are 22.1 million undocumented immigrants in the United States .
I actually believe that even the Yale assessment understates the magnitude of the illegal alien population in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t ask don ’ t tell ” policies of a growing number of “ Sanctuary Cities ” and “ Sanctuary States ” further complicates the issue .
Furthermore we can look back to the Reagan administration ’ s passage of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 ( IRCA ) .
Prior to the passage of that bill the Reagan administration estimated that some one million illegal aliens would participate in that amnesty program .
In the end more than 3.5 million aliens participated .
So now we come back to my @ @ @ @ @ @ @ likely acquire lawful immigrant status through the passage of Comprehensive Immigration Reform .
You might think that the answer would only involve the number of illegal aliens who are present in the United States .
You would be completely wrong !
What is never discussed is the fact that under Comprehensive Immigration Reform every alien who would be granted lawful status would also immediately be granted the absolute right to bring his/her spouse and minor children to the United States , if they were not already here .
Families in Third World countries @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Of course not every illegal alien is married and not every illegal alien would have children back in their home countries .
Let us then , for the sake of argument , optimistically estimate that on average each legalized illegal alien would petition for two minor children to have them come to the United States along with their spouses .
Let us also be optimistic and estimate that about 25 million illegal aliens would participate in Comprehensive Immigration Reform .
This would mean that overnight 50 million minor aliens would be able to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ immediately be enrolled in our public schools across the United States .
Many would be accompanied by one of their parents who had remained back home to care for them .
Imagine the impact this would have on our already struggling schools to educate American children , even as more money continues to be used to teach English as a second language .
The massive influx of tens of millions of immigrants would increase congestion , drive up the prices of real estate and lead to more homelessness as wages would be suppressed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The increased demand for food , clothing and other essentials would cause significant inflation while the already crumbling infrastructure in cities across the United States would face unprecedented stresses with increased demands for electricity , water , transportation and other such necessities .
Unemployment rates would skyrocket as millions of more workers would flood into the labor pool .
I previously noted that I had given Comprehensive Immigration Reform the new title of the “ Terrorist Assistance and Facilitation Act.
” Given the true magnitude of this program today , we must @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suicidal bill , the “ Overwhelm America Act.
” Think of how , in a few short years , Venezuela went from being the wealthiest nation in South America to the poorest .
We must never forget President Reagan ’ s warning :

We must never lose sight of the fact that Bernie Sanders is a pro-communist candidate who has called for a “Political Revolution” in America. He must be taken at his word.
Sanders steadfastly lauds Cuba’s Castro for providing health care and education for Cubans, blithely ignoring the barbaric brutality of the Cuban communist government that has caused many Cubans to flee Cuba by perilously taking to the sea on virtually anything that floats. Sanders also ignores the actual collusion between Castro and Russia that brought the world to the brink of a nuclear World War III in October 1962 when Castro welcomed nuclear-tipped Russian missiles that could have struck cities across the east coast of the United States including Washington, DC and New York.
Bernie has also expressed similar sentiments about former Nicaraguan communist and totalitarian Sandinista leader, Daniel Ortega.
It is beyond disturbing and very telling, that Sanders, a candidate for the U.S. presidency, would hold such anti-American foreign leaders in high esteem.
My dad used to tell me that if you want to turn capitalists into communists, take away their money.
It is my belief that Bernie Sanders plans to achieve a total revolution in America through passage of Comprehensive Immigration Reform coupled with his off the charts costly programs to provide for everyone in the United States, not just citizens of the United States with “Medicare for all,” free college and a number of other such expensive programs that would crash our systems.
Not long ago, Bernie was clear about his opposition to Comprehensive Immigration Reform because of the harm it would do to the jobs and wages of American workers. Now he has come to not only embrace such dangerous legislation, but essentially end immigration law enforcement. Many of his colleagues in the radicalized Democratic Party are in agreement with him.
Comprehensive Immigration Reform would also undermine public safety and national security. This aspect of Comprehensive Immigration Reform was the focus of my June 22, 2007 Op-Ed for the Washington Times, Immigration bill a ‘No Go’ wherein I suggested that the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act should be renamed the “Terrorist Assistance and Facilitation Act” because there would be no way to interview, let alone conduct field investigations, to verify the information provided in the applications of the unknown millions of illegal aliens who would apply to participate in this wrong-headed program. Remember, these are aliens who entered the U.S. without inspection so that their actual identities and entry data would be unknown and unknowable.
On January 19, 2020 Buzz Feed News published a report, “He Has Made Wild Shifts”: How Bernie Sanders Has Changed His Approach To Immigration that began with this excerpt:
When Bernie Sanders joined the Senate, he and his allies in the labor movement took on a big target: a new comprehensive immigration reform bill. “I believe we have very serious immigration problems in this country,” Sanders said during a 2007 press event, with AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka behind him. “I think as you’ve heard today, sanctions against employers who employ illegal immigrants is virtually nonexistent. Our border is very porous.”“And I think at a time when the middle class is shrinking, the last thing we need is to bring over in a period of years, millions of people into this country who are prepared to lower wages for American workers,”
The key question we must consider is, “How many aliens would be granted lawful status in the United States if our government was to pass this dangerous legislation?”
For more than a decade we have been told by various agencies that there are approximately 11 million illegal aliens residing in the United States. However, that number is likely way off.
On September 21, 2018 Yale University’s website, Yale Insights published a report, Yale Study Finds Twice as Many Undocumented Immigrants as Previous Estimates that began with this excerpt:
Immigration is the focus of fierce political and policy debate in the United States. Among the most contentious issues is how the country should address undocumented immigrants. Like a tornado that won’t dissipate, arguments have spun around and around for years. At the center lies a fairly stable and largely unquestioned number: 11.3 million undocumented immigrants residing in the U.S. But a paper by three Yale-affiliated researchers suggests all the perceptions and arguments based on that number may have a faulty foundation; the actual population of undocumented immigrants residing in the country is much larger than that, perhaps twice as high, and has been underestimated for decades. Using mathematical modeling on a range of demographic and immigration operations data, the researchers estimate there are 22.1 million undocumented immigrants in the United States.
I actually believe that even the Yale assessment understates the magnitude of the illegal alien population in the United States. The “don’t ask don’t tell” policies of a growing number of “Sanctuary Cities” and “Sanctuary States” further complicates the issue. Furthermore we can look back to the Reagan administration’s passage of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA). Prior to the passage of that bill the Reagan administration estimated that some one million illegal aliens would participate in that amnesty program. In the end more than 3.5 million aliens participated.
So now we come back to my question as to how many aliens would likely acquire lawful immigrant status through the passage of Comprehensive Immigration Reform.
You might think that the answer would only involve the number of illegal aliens who are present in the United States.
You would be completely wrong!
What is never discussed is the fact that under Comprehensive Immigration Reform every alien who would be granted lawful status would also immediately be granted the absolute right to bring his/her spouse and minor children to the United States, if they were not already here.
Families in Third World countries generally have many, many children. Of course not every illegal alien is married and not every illegal alien would have children back in their home countries. Let us then, for the sake of argument, optimistically estimate that on average each legalized illegal alien would petition for two minor children to have them come to the United States along with their spouses.
Let us also be optimistic and estimate that about 25 million illegal aliens would participate in Comprehensive Immigration Reform.
This would mean that overnight 50 million minor aliens would be able to legally immigrate to the United States and immediately be enrolled in our public schools across the United States. Many would be accompanied by one of their parents who had remained back home to care for them.
Imagine the impact this would have on our already struggling schools to educate American children, even as more money continues to be used to teach English as a second language.
The massive influx of tens of millions of immigrants would increase congestion, drive up the prices of real estate and lead to more homelessness as wages would be suppressed and the cost of housing would skyrocket.
The increased demand for food, clothing and other essentials would cause significant inflation while the already crumbling infrastructure in cities across the United States would face unprecedented stresses with increased demands for electricity, water, transportation and other such necessities.
Unemployment rates would skyrocket as millions of more workers would flood into the labor pool.
I previously noted that I had given Comprehensive Immigration Reform the new title of the “Terrorist Assistance and Facilitation Act.” Given the true magnitude of this program today, we must also add a new title to this suicidal bill, the “Overwhelm America Act.”
Think of how, in a few short years, Venezuela went from being the wealthiest nation in South America to the poorest.
We must never forget President Reagan’s warning:


thelibertydaily--2020-03-06--Crooked Hillary Clinton Pushes False Story that Trump Called Coronavirus a ‘Hoax’

Hillary Clinton appeared on “ The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon ” last night to promote her upcoming Hulu documentary “ Hillary.
” While on the show , she took the opportunity to push the false story that President Donald Trump called the coronavirus a “ hoax.
” “ I wish I could say I was surprised , ” Clinton said when asked how the Trump administration has responded to the coronavirus outbreak .
“ This is something that you can ’ t just insult or pretend is a hoax , despite how hard [ President Trump ’ s ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ listen to people who actually know something , ” the failed 2016 presidential candidate continued .
“ There ’ s a terrible shortage of testing kits .
They need to make sure state and local health departments , governors , mayors , and others , have the resources they need with hospitalization .
There ’ s a lot of work to be done and if he will quit calling it a hoax and actually let the experts do their job , I think that ’ ll work out better.
” This comes as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by claiming that Trump called coronavirus a “ hoax , ” which isn ’ t what he said at all .
Politico was one of the first outlets to push this myth , publishing a story titled “ Trump rallies his base to treat coronavirus as a ‘ hoax.
’ ” “ President Donald Trump on Friday night tried to cast the global outbreak of the coronavirus as a liberal conspiracy intended to undermine his first term , lumping it alongside impeachment and the Mueller investigation , ” reporters Nancy Cook and Matthew @ @ @ @ @ @ @ never called coronavirus a hoax .
Instead , he called the Democrats ’ efforts to politicize the virus a hoax .
“ ‘ Hoax ’ referring to the action that they take to try and pin this on somebody , because we ’ ve done such a good job , ” Trump explained this week , according to Breitbart News .
“ The hoax is on them , not—I ’ m not talking about what ’ s happening here ; I ’ m talking what they ’ re doing .
That ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when she claimed that the Trump administration is not doing enough to fight coronavirus .
Dr. Marc Siegel , professor of medicine at New York University , argued this week that Trump has been doing more to fight coronavirus than previous presidents in his position .
“ I ’ ve been handling these emerging contagions for about 20 years now , and I have to tell you , I ’ ve never seen one handled better , ” said Dr. Siegel .
It ’ s sad that Clinton is still not over her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
One would think that after three years , she would have moved on with her life by now , but that is clearly not the case as she still enjoys speaking out against Trump like it ’ s her job .
Despite what Clinton and her fellow bitter liberals say , most Americans know that Trump has taken care of us over the past three years in a way that few other presidents would be able to .
There ’ s no reason to doubt that Trump will overcome the coronavirus just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ challenge as president .
Perhaps Clinton is just mad because , deep down , she knows she could never be as good a president as Trump .
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission .
Read more at LifeZette : Rumors swirling that President Trump may drop Pence , name Nikki Haley VP Bloomberg drops out of race House Democrat-turned-Republican Van Drew says more may join GOP

March 5, 2020
Hillary Clinton appeared on “The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon” last night to promote her upcoming Hulu documentary “Hillary.”
While on the show, she took the opportunity to push the false story that President Donald Trump called the coronavirus a “hoax.”
“I wish I could say I was surprised,” Clinton said when asked how the Trump administration has responded to the coronavirus outbreak.
“This is something that you can’t just insult or pretend is a hoax, despite how hard [President Trump’s] trying.”
“You really have to listen to people who actually know something,” the failed 2016 presidential candidate continued.
RELATED: ‘I’m now nervous’: CNBC’s Jim Cramer makes ominous Coronavirus prediction
“There’s a terrible shortage of testing kits. They need to make sure state and local health departments, governors, mayors, and others, have the resources they need with hospitalization. There’s a lot of work to be done and if he will quit calling it a hoax and actually let the experts do their job, I think that’ll work out better.”
This comes as the media has been lying for days by claiming that Trump called coronavirus a “hoax,” which isn’t what he said at all. Politico was one of the first outlets to push this myth, publishing a story titled “Trump rallies his base to treat coronavirus as a ‘hoax.’”
“President Donald Trump on Friday night tried to cast the global outbreak of the coronavirus as a liberal conspiracy intended to undermine his first term, lumping it alongside impeachment and the Mueller investigation,” reporters Nancy Cook and Matthew Choi wrote.
In reality, Trump never called coronavirus a hoax. Instead, he called the Democrats’ efforts to politicize the virus a hoax.
“‘Hoax’ referring to the action that they take to try and pin this on somebody, because we’ve done such a good job,” Trump explained this week, according to Breitbart News. “The hoax is on them, not—I’m not talking about what’s happening here; I’m talking what they’re doing. That’s the hoax.”
Clinton was also lying when she claimed that the Trump administration is not doing enough to fight coronavirus. Dr. Marc Siegel, professor of medicine at New York University, argued this week that Trump has been doing more to fight coronavirus than previous presidents in his position.
RELATED: Coronavirus a bioweapon?
“I’ve been handling these emerging contagions for about 20 years now, and I have to tell you, I’ve never seen one handled better,” said Dr. Siegel.
It’s sad that Clinton is still not over her loss to Trump in the presidential election. One would think that after three years, she would have moved on with her life by now, but that is clearly not the case as she still enjoys speaking out against Trump like it’s her job.
Despite what Clinton and her fellow bitter liberals say, most Americans know that Trump has taken care of us over the past three years in a way that few other presidents would be able to. There’s no reason to doubt that Trump will overcome the coronavirus just like he’s overcome every other challenge as president.
Perhaps Clinton is just mad because, deep down, she knows she could never be as good a president as Trump.
This piece originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
Rumors swirling that President Trump may drop Pence, name Nikki Haley VP
Bloomberg drops out of race
House Democrat-turned-Republican Van Drew says more may join GOP
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com Could Joe Biden Mentally Manage Being President of the United States?
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.


thelibertydaily--2020-03-07--President Trump’s Latest Arrow at Pocahontas Has Everyone Laughing

After signing the coronavirus funding bill , President Trump took questions Friday from the press .
One question came up about whether the President thought sexism played a role in the downfall of Elizabeth Warren .
The President didn ’ t think so .
“ I think lack of talent was her problem.
” President Trump said .
“ She had a tremendous lack of talent .
She was a good debater .
She destroyed Mike Bloomberg very quickly like it was nothing .
That was easy for her but people don ’ t like her.
” This is something @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump regarding Warren , but others have made the observation throughout her run for the nomination .
While she took pride in taking hundreds of thousands of selfies with people , she didn ’ t generally seem to get the same adoration as her progressive lane competition , Bernie Sanders .
“ She is a very mean person and people don ’ t like her .
People don ’ t want that , ” the President said .
Politico didn ’ t know what to think about his final comment on the issue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attack on women , echoing mainstream media ’ s narrative they tried in 2016 when President Trump called Hillary Clinton a “ nasty woman.
” But this time is very different .
What he said wasn ’ t mean .
It was hilarious .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
We have two priorities until election day : Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates .
We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
After signing the coronavirus funding bill, President Trump took questions Friday from the press. One question came up about whether the President thought sexism played a role in the downfall of Elizabeth Warren. The President didn’t think so.
“I think lack of talent was her problem.” President Trump said. “She had a tremendous lack of talent. She was a good debater. She destroyed Mike Bloomberg very quickly like it was nothing. That was easy for her but people don’t like her.”
This is something we haven’t heard from President Trump regarding Warren, but others have made the observation throughout her run for the nomination. While she took pride in taking hundreds of thousands of selfies with people, she didn’t generally seem to get the same adoration as her progressive lane competition, Bernie Sanders.
“She is a very mean person and people don’t like her. People don’t want that,” the President said.
Politico didn’t know what to think about his final comment on the issue.
Trump then claimed that “people like a person like me, that is not mean.” It was not clear whether he was joking.
Trump rejected a suggestion that sexism grounded Elizabeth Warren's campaign: "I think lack of talent was her problem. She had a tremendous lack of talent… she is a very mean person and people don't like her… they like a person like me that's not mean" https://t.co/Soziuhi9Qi pic.twitter.com/7jvxzq3F0k — POLITICO (@politico) March 6, 2020
This will be turned into an attack on women, echoing mainstream media’s narrative they tried in 2016 when President Trump called Hillary Clinton a “nasty woman.” But this time is very different. What he said wasn’t mean. It was hilarious.
American Conservative Movement
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. We have two priorities until election day: Stopping Democrats and supporting strong conservative candidates. We currently have 7500+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


thelibertydaily--2020-03-07--President Trump Keeps Promise To Defend Border, Now Deploying US Troops in Anticipation of Surge of

President Trump Keeps Promise To Defend Border, Now Deploying US Troops in Anticipation of Surge of Illegals

President Donald Trump must be thinking of the immortal words of Scarface , “ You want to play games ?
Okay , I play with you.
” In response to the almost always liberal-leaning Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ’ decision to halt the administration ’ s Migrant Protection Protocols — also known as “ Remain in Mexico ” — starting on March 12 , the president has sent a message .
Say hello to his little friends .
And by little friends , I mean the United States military members being sent to the border to help secure it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now expects .
According to The Daily Caller , in a conference call with reporters on Friday , senior officials with Customs and Border Protection said that they feared an influx of migrants at the border in light of the ruling .
They also said that with the fear of coronavirus , they are concerned that carriers could come across the border and spread the disease .
TRENDING : Biden Commits the Ultimate Gaffe , Intros His Wife as His Sister on Live TV “ As demonstrated last Friday , following the 9th @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ] ruling announcement , the balancing between facilitating the flow of legitimate trade and travel while upholding our national border security mission and the safety of the public and our personnel is delicate , ” one senior official said .
“ CBP ports of entry are not designed or equipped to handle extremely large groups of travelers arriving at the same time , and temporary closure of a [ port of entry ] is contemplated as an extreme option as necessary for public safety and border security , ” they said .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which was started in January 2019 , has been an effective means of mitigating illegal border crossings .
But liberal groups , as they usually do , could not leave well enough alone and continue an orderly process .
If they were really concerned about legitimate asylum cases , why would they have an issue with applicants staying in Mexico while their court cases play out ?
The program has seen tens of thousands of migrants sent to Mexico during the adjudication of their cases , the Caller reported .
This effectively ended @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” in which migrants were given a court date and released into the United States , some of them never to be seen again .
When the appeals court blocked the MPP on Feb. 28 , migrants began to rush the border and officials had to shut it down .
The court put the ruling on hold , but then decided to block the program in California and Arizona starting on March 12 .
RELATED : Girl Cries 'Daddy , Daddy ' After Illegal in Sanctuary City Allegedly Lures Her to Bathroom , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the administration filed an emergency petition with the Supreme Court asking to keep the policy in place pending appeal , but if the court does not weigh in before March 12 , all hell could break loose on the border .
“ Based on the pending [ Migrant Protection Protocol ] decision , continued concerns of large groups attempting to enter through [ ports of entry ] , and COVID-19 containment and mitigation concerns , CBP has activated the crisis response force , ” the CBP official said .
Around 160 active-duty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , with 80 going to the Paso del Norte port of entry in Texas and 80 going to the San Ysidro port of entry in California .
The force will not engage in immigration enforcement and will be active at the border for two weeks beginning no later than Saturday .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

President Donald Trump must be thinking of the immortal words of Scarface, “You want to play games? Okay, I play with you.”
In response to the almost always liberal-leaning Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision to halt the administration’s Migrant Protection Protocols — also known as “Remain in Mexico” — starting on March 12, the president has sent a message.
Say hello to his little friends. And by little friends, I mean the United States military members being sent to the border to help secure it from the flood of migrants the administration now expects.
According to The Daily Caller, in a conference call with reporters on Friday, senior officials with Customs and Border Protection said that they feared an influx of migrants at the border in light of the ruling.
They also said that with the fear of coronavirus, they are concerned that carriers could come across the border and spread the disease.
“As demonstrated last Friday, following the 9th Circuit’s [Migrant Protection Protocol] ruling announcement, the balancing between facilitating the flow of legitimate trade and travel while upholding our national border security mission and the safety of the public and our personnel is delicate,” one senior official said.
“CBP ports of entry are not designed or equipped to handle extremely large groups of travelers arriving at the same time, and temporary closure of a [port of entry] is contemplated as an extreme option as necessary for public safety and border security,” they said.
The “Remain in Mexico” policy, which was started in January 2019, has been an effective means of mitigating illegal border crossings.
But liberal groups, as they usually do, could not leave well enough alone and continue an orderly process.
Should the Supreme Court intervene? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 85% (3103 Votes) No: 15% (568 Votes)
If they were really concerned about legitimate asylum cases, why would they have an issue with applicants staying in Mexico while their court cases play out?
The program has seen tens of thousands of migrants sent to Mexico during the adjudication of their cases, the Caller reported.
This effectively ended the policy of “catch and release” in which migrants were given a court date and released into the United States, some of them never to be seen again.
When the appeals court blocked the MPP on Feb. 28, migrants began to rush the border and officials had to shut it down.
The court put the ruling on hold, but then decided to block the program in California and Arizona starting on March 12.
On Friday, the administration filed an emergency petition with the Supreme Court asking to keep the policy in place pending appeal, but if the court does not weigh in before March 12, all hell could break loose on the border.
“Based on the pending [Migrant Protection Protocol] decision, continued concerns of large groups attempting to enter through [ports of entry], and COVID-19 containment and mitigation concerns, CBP has activated the crisis response force,” the CBP official said.
Around 160 active-duty personnel will be sent to the border, with 80 going to the Paso del Norte port of entry in Texas and 80 going to the San Ysidro port of entry in California.
The force will not engage in immigration enforcement and will be active at the border for two weeks beginning no later than Saturday.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


thelibertydaily--2020-03-07--Republican Voter Enthusiasm Hits Record High

Excitement about voting in this year ’ s presidential election is up across the board , but Republican enthusiasm is at a record high in 2020 , a recent poll finds .
A Gallup survey released Friday evaluated relative enthusiasm for both parties at this point in the election cycle and found that the Republicans ’ eagerness to vote is at an all-time high .
More Republicans surveyed said they felt “ more enthusiastic than usual about voting ” in the 2020 election than they have at this point in any other election cycle since Gallup began tracking the criterion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enthusiasm they have in the early months of any election since Gallup first measured this in 2000 , ” Gallup noted .
According to the survey , 64 percent of Republican and Republican-leaning voters are feeling more enthusiastic than usual about voting this year .
TRENDING : Biden Commits the Ultimate Gaffe , Intros His Wife as His Sister on Live TV The previous high for voting enthusiasm among Republicans at a similar point in the election cycle was tied at 53 percent in 2012 and 2004 .
“ Republicans held nonsignificant leads @ @ @ @ @ @ @ both years when Republicans prevailed in the Electoral College , if not the popular vote , ” Gallup said .
The survey found that Democrats ’ relative enthusiasm currently stands at 58 percent .
While lagging behind the enthusiasm of Republicans , the metric is higher than it was in 2016 .
For comparison , relative enthusiasm among Democrats was at 43 percent in May 2016 and at 45 percent in February 2012 .
Relative enthusiasm recorded for Democrats going into the 2008 election was at 79 percent in February of that year @ @ @ @ @ @ @ general election that year over then-Republican Arizona Sen. John McCain .
“ Historically , in the early months of a campaign , there is not a clear relationship between the competitiveness of a nomination and party enthusiasm , ” Gallup reported .
“ In some years when only one party had a competitive race for the nomination , that party was the more enthusiastic : Republicans in 2012 and Democrats in 2004 .
By contrast , although President Donald Trump is seeking reelection this year and Democrats are waging a nomination contest , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ added that despite the fact that only the Democrats are engaged in a competitive primary , “ Americans of both major party groups are giving a great deal of thought to the campaign and feel enthusiastic about the election relative to prior years.
” “ The numbers provide some insight into why Republican primary turnout has been so strong , despite the lack of a serious Trump challenger , ” Gallup reported .
RELATED : Trump Campaign Hits CNN with Lawsuit for 'Millions of Dollars' The Trump campaign has waged a massive effort @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s Republican primary .
As a result , the president has racked up record numbers in some primary states .
More than 31,000 Republicans showed up to vote for Trump in the Iowa Republican caucuses .
For comparison , only 25,000 Democrats voted for then-incumbent President Barack Obama in Iowa in 2012 , according to Politico .
Trump ’ s 129,696 votes in the New Hampshire primary last month more than doubled the number of votes for incumbents Obama and former President George W. Bush in 2012 and 2004 , respectively .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ could be “ a warning sign for Democrats in November.
” Gallup ’ s results were based on telephone interviews with a random sample of 1,020 adults between Feb , 17 and Feb. 28 .
The margin of sampling error for results based off the entire sample was plus- or minus-4 percentage points .
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Excitement about voting in this year’s presidential election is up across the board, but Republican enthusiasm is at a record high in 2020, a recent poll finds.
A Gallup survey released Friday evaluated relative enthusiasm for both parties at this point in the election cycle and found that the Republicans’ eagerness to vote is at an all-time high.
More Republicans surveyed said they felt “more enthusiastic than usual about voting” in the 2020 election than they have at this point in any other election cycle since Gallup began tracking the criterion.
Republicans are “expressing the most enthusiasm they have in the early months of any election since Gallup first measured this in 2000,” Gallup noted.
According to the survey, 64 percent of Republican and Republican-leaning voters are feeling more enthusiastic than usual about voting this year.
The previous high for voting enthusiasm among Republicans at a similar point in the election cycle was tied at 53 percent in 2012 and 2004.
“Republicans held nonsignificant leads on enthusiasm in 2004 and 2016, both years when Republicans prevailed in the Electoral College, if not the popular vote,” Gallup said.
The survey found that Democrats’ relative enthusiasm currently stands at 58 percent.
While lagging behind the enthusiasm of Republicans, the metric is higher than it was in 2016. For comparison, relative enthusiasm among Democrats was at 43 percent in May 2016 and at 45 percent in February 2012.
Do you think President Trump will be re-elected? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 98% (251 Votes) No: 2% (6 Votes)
Relative enthusiasm recorded for Democrats going into the 2008 election was at 79 percent in February of that year. Barack Obama easily won in the general election that year over then-Republican Arizona Sen. John McCain.
“Historically, in the early months of a campaign, there is not a clear relationship between the competitiveness of a nomination and party enthusiasm,” Gallup reported.
“In some years when only one party had a competitive race for the nomination, that party was the more enthusiastic: Republicans in 2012 and Democrats in 2004. By contrast, although President Donald Trump is seeking reelection this year and Democrats are waging a nomination contest, Republicans are the more enthusiastic.”
Gallup added that despite the fact that only the Democrats are engaged in a competitive primary, “Americans of both major party groups are giving a great deal of thought to the campaign and feel enthusiastic about the election relative to prior years.”
“The numbers provide some insight into why Republican primary turnout has been so strong, despite the lack of a serious Trump challenger,” Gallup reported.
The Trump campaign has waged a massive effort to drive voter turnout in this year’s Republican primary.
As a result, the president has racked up record numbers in some primary states.
More than 31,000 Republicans showed up to vote for Trump in the Iowa Republican caucuses.
For comparison, only 25,000 Democrats voted for then-incumbent President Barack Obama in Iowa in 2012, according to Politico.
Trump’s 129,696 votes in the New Hampshire primary last month more than doubled the number of votes for incumbents Obama and former President George W. Bush in 2012 and 2004, respectively.
Politico reported that the record Republican turnout could be “a warning sign for Democrats in November.”
Gallup’s results were based on telephone interviews with a random sample of 1,020 adults between Feb, 17 and Feb. 28. The margin of sampling error for results based off the entire sample was plus- or minus-4 percentage points.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


thelibertydaily--2020-03-07--President Trump Crushes Bernie’s Rally Attendance in Key Swing State of Arizona

After a disappointing performance on Super Tuesday , Sen. Bernie Sanders hosted a rally in Phoenix , Arizona , on Thursday night which only drew around 7,500 people .
It was held in the same building that hosted President Donald Trump ’ s rally last month — one which attracted a considerably larger amount of people .
Trump may have attracted more supporters than Sanders , but the 2020 race in Arizona isn ’ t assured for the Republican president .
Since the state has been historically red , the close results in 2016 proved to both the Republican and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ need to increase in order to secure votes for their respective parties in 2020 .
TRENDING : Biden Commits the Ultimate Gaffe , Intros His Wife as His Sister on Live TV Because of the state ’ s history , it came as no surprise that Trump ’ s rally on Feb. 19 drew so many attendees , some of whom were unable to find seats within the arena and instead filled the parking lot outside .
Brad Parscale , Trump ’ s re-election campaign manager , tweeted that over 67,000 tickets were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ showed up .
A large crowd of anti-Trump protesters also gathered along a designated free speech zone outside the Arizona Veterans Memorial Coliseum .
Some Trump supporters camped out in line more than a day before the event in order to secure their spot to hear the president speak .
Thursday ’ s rally , however , was relatively empty until after the program began .
The Sanders campaign later said that nearly 7,500 people ended up attending the rally .
The balcony level was scarcely filled and the platform designated for news @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the ground level .
It is important to note that while Sanders ’ turnout was significantly lower , Trump likely drew a larger crowd because of his current position as president and because he is the only viable Republican candidate for president .
Sanders , on the other hand , is still going head-to-head against former Vice President Joe Biden , who won 10 states to Sanders ’ four on Super Tuesday .
Therefore , Democratic support is clearly still split .
While it ’ s hard to predict exactly how the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , it does suggest that the 2020 race in Arizona may not be as black-and-white as some believe .
Both Arizona state chapters of the RNC and the DNC have placed extreme importance on the race within the state and increased canvassing efforts .
For both parties , complacency could be detrimental .
Former Georgia state representative and failed 2018 Democratic gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams , who has unabashedly voiced her interest in being the eventual Democratic nominee ’ s vice president , visited Arizona on Feb. 20 “ Arizona is a major @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Arizona GOP Chairwoman Dr. Kelli Ward has expressed a similar assessment of the state ’ s importance in the November general election .
Even as the Sanders rally began , she put out a statement that emphasized how Trump ’ s policies have directly impacted Arizonans .
“ As avowed socialist Bernie Sanders takes the stage in Phoenix tonight , Arizonans should know of his radical proposals to eliminate private health insurance , raise taxes on the middle class , open borders , abolish ICE , and destroy a strong economy that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she said .
“ Meanwhile , President Trump continues to deliver on his promises to provide more jobs , negotiate fairer trade deals , and lower taxes for the people of the Grand Canyon State.
” We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

After a disappointing performance on Super Tuesday, Sen. Bernie Sanders hosted a rally in Phoenix, Arizona, on Thursday night which only drew around 7,500 people.
It was held in the same building that hosted President Donald Trump’s rally last month — one which attracted a considerably larger amount of people.
Trump may have attracted more supporters than Sanders, but the 2020 race in Arizona isn’t assured for the Republican president.
In 2016, President Trump won Arizona’s electorate votes, defeating Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton by a thin 3.5 percentage point margin.
Since the state has been historically red, the close results in 2016 proved to both the Republican and Democratic National Committees that their efforts would need to increase in order to secure votes for their respective parties in 2020.
Because of the state’s history, it came as no surprise that Trump’s rally on Feb. 19 drew so many attendees, some of whom were unable to find seats within the arena and instead filled the parking lot outside.
Brad Parscale, Trump’s re-election campaign manager, tweeted that over 67,000 tickets were requested, although not that many people showed up.
A large crowd of anti-Trump protesters also gathered along a designated free speech zone outside the Arizona Veterans Memorial Coliseum.
Some Trump supporters camped out in line more than a day before the event in order to secure their spot to hear the president speak.
Thursday’s rally, however, was relatively empty until after the program began. The Sanders campaign later said that nearly 7,500 people ended up attending the rally.
The balcony level was scarcely filled and the platform designated for news outlets was pushed closer to the stage on the ground level.
Even though the arena eventually filled up more, it was still a far cry from President Trump’s turnout: 7,500 compared to 45,000. pic.twitter.com/LqDPId2hSM — Kayla Kunkel (@KaylaKatWJ) March 6, 2020
Wow! An incredible contrast between the crowd at President @realDonaldTrump’s rally two weeks ago and the crowd at Bernie Sanders’ rally last night. KEEP ARIZONA GREAT!! ?? pic.twitter.com/X6CY8ER5Sv — Dr. Kelli Ward ?? (@kelliwardaz) March 6, 2020
It is important to note that while Sanders’ turnout was significantly lower, Trump likely drew a larger crowd because of his current position as president and because he is the only viable Republican candidate for president.
Do you think Trump will win Arizona in 2020? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 99% (192 Votes) No: 1% (2 Votes)
Sanders, on the other hand, is still going head-to-head against former Vice President Joe Biden, who won 10 states to Sanders’ four on Super Tuesday. Therefore, Democratic support is clearly still split.
While it’s hard to predict exactly how the difference in turnouts will translate in November, it does suggest that the 2020 race in Arizona may not be as black-and-white as some believe.
Both Arizona state chapters of the RNC and the DNC have placed extreme importance on the race within the state and increased canvassing efforts.
For both parties, complacency could be detrimental.
Former Georgia state representative and failed 2018 Democratic gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, who has unabashedly voiced her interest in being the eventual Democratic nominee’s vice president, visited Arizona on Feb. 20
“Arizona is a major battleground in 2020,” she tweeted.
Arizona is a major battleground in 2020, and by turning out unlikely voters and protecting the vote, @azdemparty is poised to build on its success from 2018 to achieve victories up and down the ballot. Thank you to @SouthwestCarps Local 1912 & AZ Dems for the warm welcome! #azpol pic.twitter.com/qFR33FDKn8 — Stacey Abrams (@staceyabrams) February 21, 2020
Arizona GOP Chairwoman Dr. Kelli Ward has expressed a similar assessment of the state’s importance in the November general election.
Even as the Sanders rally began, she put out a statement that emphasized how Trump’s policies have directly impacted Arizonans.
“As avowed socialist Bernie Sanders takes the stage in Phoenix tonight, Arizonans should know of his radical proposals to eliminate private health insurance, raise taxes on the middle class, open borders, abolish ICE, and destroy a strong economy that is working for all Americans,” she said.
“Meanwhile, President Trump continues to deliver on his promises to provide more jobs, negotiate fairer trade deals, and lower taxes for the people of the Grand Canyon State.”
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


thelibertydaily--2020-03-07--Government Greed: Quid Pro Joe Biden’s Plan Would Raise Taxes by $4 Trillion Over the Next 10 Years:

Government Greed: Quid Pro Joe Biden’s Plan Would Raise Taxes by $4 Trillion Over the Next 10 Years: Report

Democratic presidential front-runner Joe Biden ’ s plans call for American taxpayers to dig deeper into their pockets — about $ 4 trillion deeper over 10 years , according to a new analysis of his proposals .
The Tax Policy Center studied the proposals that the former vice president issued as of Feb. 23 .
Successful businesses are in the cross-hairs of Biden ’ s plans , the analysis noted .
“ Biden ’ s plan would increase the top corporate income tax rate from 21 percent to 28 percent and impose a 15 percent minimum tax on companies ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
American families earning over $ 400,000 would see the tax cuts passed in 2017 and signed into law by President Donald Trump taken away , it noted .
TRENDING : Biden Commits the Ultimate Gaffe , Intros His Wife as His Sister on Live TV The Tax Policy Center said top earners will bear most of the brunt of Biden ’ s income tax changes , but that taxpayers in all brackets will feel some impact .
“ The highest-income households would see substantially larger tax increases than households in other income @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a share of their incomes , ” the report said .
Biden also wants to limit itemized deductions for high-income taxpayers and tax capital gains and dividends like ordinary income for millionaires .
In its reporting on Biden ’ s proposals , CNBC noted , “ While Wall Street may view Biden as more moderate than self-declared democratic socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders , investors would still face dramatic tax increases under his proposals.
” “ The proposal is very progressive , ” Gordon Mermin , senior research associate at the Tax Policy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a high-tax policy is a mistake .
“ Right now , one of the biggest problems we have is low investment even with low interest rates , ” Karl Smith , vice president for federal policy at the Tax Foundation , told The New York Times .
“ In general , taxing capital or productive assets is going to make that problem even worse.
” RELATED : Trump Unleashes at Town Hall , Questions Biden 's Competence : 'There 's Something Going on There' Donald Trump Jr. pushed back against Biden ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ The reality is that these tax cuts benefited the middle class incredibly in this country .
It was needed to spur investment into American companies and this is why you have the unemployment number if you have and why you have rising wages for the lowest income earners , ” Trump Jr. posted .
“ Joe wants to take all of that away and destroy the American middle class probably to pay for free healthcare , insurance , and free education for illegals .
He may be worse than The Bern , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism .
Read our editorial standards .

Democratic presidential front-runner Joe Biden’s plans call for American taxpayers to dig deeper into their pockets — about $4 trillion deeper over 10 years, according to a new analysis of his proposals.
The Tax Policy Center studied the proposals that the former vice president issued as of Feb. 23.
Successful businesses are in the cross-hairs of Biden’s plans, the analysis noted.
“Biden’s plan would increase the top corporate income tax rate from 21 percent to 28 percent and impose a 15 percent minimum tax on companies’ book income,” the analysis said.
American families earning over $400,000 would see the tax cuts passed in 2017 and signed into law by President Donald Trump taken away, it noted.
The Tax Policy Center said top earners will bear most of the brunt of Biden’s income tax changes, but that taxpayers in all brackets will feel some impact.
“The highest-income households would see substantially larger tax increases than households in other income groups, both in dollar amounts and as a share of their incomes,” the report said.
Biden to Middle Class: “I’m going to increase your taxes.” pic.twitter.com/3Ta3T9XQKh — Merissa Hamilton (@merissahamilton) February 29, 2020
Would a Joe Biden presidency tank the economy? Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Yes: 99% (341 Votes) No: 1% (4 Votes)
Biden also wants to limit itemized deductions for high-income taxpayers and tax capital gains and dividends like ordinary income for millionaires.
In its reporting on Biden’s proposals, CNBC noted, “While Wall Street may view Biden as more moderate than self-declared democratic socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders, investors would still face dramatic tax increases under his proposals.”
“The proposal is very progressive,” Gordon Mermin, senior research associate at the Tax Policy Center, told CNBC.
Some believe a high-tax policy is a mistake.
“Right now, one of the biggest problems we have is low investment even with low interest rates,” Karl Smith, vice president for federal policy at the Tax Foundation, told The New York Times. “In general, taxing capital or productive assets is going to make that problem even worse.”
Donald Trump Jr. pushed back against Biden’s high-tax policy in an Instagram post.
“The reality is that these tax cuts benefited the middle class incredibly in this country. It was needed to spur investment into American companies and this is why you have the unemployment number if you have and why you have rising wages for the lowest income earners,” Trump Jr. posted.
“Joe wants to take all of that away and destroy the American middle class probably to pay for free healthcare, insurance, and free education for illegals. He may be worse than The Bern,” he wrote.
Truth and Accuracy Submit a Correction → * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success! We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.


thelibertydaily--2020-03-07--WAR ON WOMEN: Democrats Change Debate Rules to Exclude Only Woman in Race

The Democratic National Committee has changed its presidential debate qualifications to exclude Rep. Tulsi Gabbard ( D. , Hawaii ) , the only remaining female and minority candidate in the race .
Under the newly announced rules for the March 15 CNN/Univision debate , candidates must have at least 20 percent of the awarded pledged delegates in order to qualify .
In every debate since February 's Iowa caucus , any candidate who received even a single delegate automatically qualified for the debate .
Gabbard won two delegates on Super Tuesday by placing second in her native American Samoa .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bernie Sanders have already locked up the required delegates , but the rule change makes it nearly impossible for Gabbard to qualify , even with a strong showing in the next round of primaries .
The congresswoman needs 335 more delegates to lock up 20 percent by March 15 , but only 352 are up for grabs on March 10 .
Gabbard suggested on Thursday that she would attend the debate if invited , tweeting that she would `` welcome the opportunity to raise & discuss the foreign policy challenges we face .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ downplay the prospect of Gabbard making the debates in a Super Tuesday tweet , saying , `` of course the threshold will go up . ''
The exclusion of Gabbard comes one day after Sen. Elizabeth Warren ( D. , Mass . )
suspended her campaign , leaving the race with only one female candidate and prompting extensive soul-searching and criticism from Democratic women and media figures .
`` I so wish that we had a woman president of the United States , and we came so close to doing that , '' @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( D. , Calif. ) .
`` I do think there 's a certain element of misogyny . ''
Former presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris ( D. , Calif. ) omitted Gabbard entirely in her reaction to Warren 's departure , telling reporters , `` Look at what 's happened .
There are no women currently in this race . ''

The Democratic National Committee has changed its presidential debate qualifications to exclude Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D., Hawaii), the only remaining female and minority candidate in the race.
Under the newly announced rules for the March 15 CNN/Univision debate, candidates must have at least 20 percent of the awarded pledged delegates in order to qualify. In every debate since February's Iowa caucus, any candidate who received even a single delegate automatically qualified for the debate. Gabbard won two delegates on Super Tuesday by placing second in her native American Samoa.
Elderly white male candidates Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders have already locked up the required delegates, but the rule change makes it nearly impossible for Gabbard to qualify, even with a strong showing in the next round of primaries. The congresswoman needs 335 more delegates to lock up 20 percent by March 15, but only 352 are up for grabs on March 10.
Gabbard suggested on Thursday that she would attend the debate if invited, tweeting that she would "welcome the opportunity to raise & discuss the foreign policy challenges we face."
DNC spokeswoman Xochitl Hinojosa appeared to downplay the prospect of Gabbard making the debates in a Super Tuesday tweet, saying, "of course the threshold will go up."
We have two more debates-- of course the threshold will go up. By the time we have the March debate, almost 2,000 delegates will be allocated. The threshold will reflect where we are in the race, as it always has. — Xochitl Hinojosa (@XochitlHinojosa) March 4, 2020
The exclusion of Gabbard comes one day after Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) suspended her campaign, leaving the race with only one female candidate and prompting extensive soul-searching and criticism from Democratic women and media figures.
"I so wish that we had a woman president of the United States, and we came so close to doing that," said Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.). "I do think there's a certain element of misogyny."
Former presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris (D., Calif.) omitted Gabbard entirely in her reaction to Warren's departure, telling reporters, "Look at what's happened. There are no women currently in this race."


thelibertydaily--2020-03-07--President Trump Correctly Labels Washington Democrat Governor Jay Inslee a ‘Snake’ During Visit to t

President Trump Correctly Labels Washington Democrat Governor Jay Inslee a ‘Snake’ During Visit to the CDC

President Trump just finished his visit to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta , Ga. and ended @ @ @ @ @ Washington Dem Gov .
Jay Inslee : Up until that point , his visit was @ @ @ @ @ the Atlanta Journal-Constitution ’ s Greg Bluestein .
.
.
On their new coronavirus test @ @ @ @ @ cases in the U.S. : On the statistics of the outbreak : On the cancelation @ @ @ @ @ : His rallies will go on : Tests will be available to everyone who needs @ @ @ @ @ of coronavirus :

President Trump just finished his visit to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Ga. and ended it with this comment on Washington Dem Gov. Jay Inslee:
Trump on Inslee: "I told Mike not to be complimentary of that Gov because that Gov is a snake…Let me just tell you we have a lot of problems with the Gov and the Gov of WA, that's where you have many of your problems, OK? So Mike may be happy with him but I'm not OK?" — Meridith McGraw (@meridithmcgraw) March 6, 2020
Up until that point, his visit was pretty uneventful. Highlights via the Atlanta Journal-Constitution’s Greg Bluestein. . .
On the CDC:
Trump says he’s impressed with “how professional” the CDC lab is. “It’s incredible,” he declares. #gapol pic.twitter.com/780tq8J2Js — Greg Bluestein (@bluestein) March 6, 2020
On their new coronavirus test:
Facing criticism over too stringent testing guidelines, CDC scientists say they’ve worked to develop new standards for testing. Trump says he’s confident in the agency’s “fantastic work.” pic.twitter.com/WCWbkBTbsa — Greg Bluestein (@bluestein) March 6, 2020
On the number of cases in the U.S.:
Trump: “As of the time I left the plane with you, we had 240 cases …” he says, before asking a reporter about the ratings of his Fox News town hall last night. He continues, saying he’s hearing “the numbers are getting much better in some cases.” #gapol pic.twitter.com/0WVe20t2y2 — Greg Bluestein (@bluestein) March 6, 2020
On the statistics of the outbreak:
Trump is telling reporters that the coronavirus statistics would look far better if they included people with the virus who went undiagnosed before they got better. pic.twitter.com/hj8ZVuhgq0 — Greg Bluestein (@bluestein) March 6, 2020
On the cancelation of conferences and corporate travel:
Asked about whether corporations were smart to cancel conferences and travel, Trump says, “I wouldn’t be generally inclined to do it.” On a personal level, he says he’s “not at all” refusing to shake hands. “I feel very secure.” pic.twitter.com/f5Qt4ekwpr — Greg Bluestein (@bluestein) March 6, 2020
His rallies will go on:
Trump said he’s not considering canceling campaign rallies. He said he’s still drawing large crowds and the risk “doesn’t bother me at all and doesn’t bother them at all.” pic.twitter.com/tfcjxTcm52 — Greg Bluestein (@bluestein) March 6, 2020
Tests will be available to everyone who needs one:
Says Trump: “Anybody who needs a test” will get one. “And they’re making millions more.” pic.twitter.com/SX8D7iiV13 — Greg Bluestein (@bluestein) March 6, 2020
On economic turbulence:
“I think we’re doing a really good job in this country keeping it down …” Trump says, lamenting the economic turbulence. “We were going like clockwork,” he says of the Dow’s rise. (Standing behind him is @senatorloeffler, whose husband’s company owns the NYSE.) #gasen pic.twitter.com/AaHRdg7HSl — Greg Bluestein (@bluestein) March 6, 2020
On the spread of coronavirus:


thelibertydaily--2020-03-07--Tulsi Gabbard Calls Out Biden and Bernie After DNC Locks: ‘Have the Courage’ to ‘Stand Up for What i

Tulsi Gabbard Calls Out Biden and Bernie After DNC Locks: ‘Have the Courage’ to ‘Stand Up for What is Right’  Her Out of Debate

Tulsi Gabbard calls out Biden and Bernie after the DNC locks her out of the debate She is still in @ @ @ @ @ Democratic Party changed its rules just to keep her off the stage .

Despite all the accusations of misogyny and sexism in recent days over Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) dropping out of the Democratic presidential primary, there is still a woman in the race.
That woman is Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), and the Democratic National Committee announced Friday that it had changed its qualifications for the next debate in a move that solely blocks Gabbard from taking the stage against frontrunners Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and former Vice President Joe Biden.
On Friday night, Gabbard reacted to the DNC's maneuvering, and called on her opponents to have the "courage" to "stand up for what is right" after the party locked her out.
What are the details?
Rep. Gabbard won two delegates on Super Tuesday, which would have qualified her for the debate stage under previous DNC rules, the Daily Caller reported earlier this week. But with low polling numbers and two clear front-runners in Sanders and Biden, the DNC was expected to up the threshold for qualifying for the debate.
Sure enough, the DNC announced Friday that the only qualifying factor for the next debate would be that a candidate must hold a "at least 20 percent of the delegates awarded as of March 15," according to The Hill.
Critics have pointed to the hypocrisy of the DNC pushing Gabbard off the stage, particularly in light of the fact that she is the only veteran, the only person of color, and the only woman remaining in the race for the party that touts itself as the party of diversity.
Gabbard, however, did not mention her service or race or gender on Friday evening when she responded publicly to the DNC's rule change. But she did mention the fact that the DNC changed its rules at the end of January in favor of billionaire Mike Bloomberg solely in order to grant him access to the stage.
"To keep me off the stage, the DNC again arbitrarily changed the debate qualifications," Gabbard tweeted. "Previously they changed the qualifications in the OPPOSITE direction so Bloomberg could debate. I ask that you stand w/ me against the DNC's transparent effort to exclude me from the debates."
Gabbard also called out her remaining opponents by name, writing, "@JoeBiden @BernieSanders I'm sure you would agree that our Democratic nominee should be a person who will stand up for what is right. So I ask that you have the courage to do that now in the face of the DNC's effort to keep me from participating in the debates. #LetTulsiDebate"


thelibertydaily--2020-03-07--NBA Notifies Teams to Prepare for Games without Fans in Attendance – Choose Fist-Bumps over High Fiv

NBA Notifies Teams to Prepare for Games without Fans in Attendance – Choose Fist-Bumps over High Fives The NBA sent @ @ @ @ @ on Friday telling them to prepare for games without fans in attendance .
This is @ @ @ @ @ the US .
As of Friday night — 335 people have tested positive for coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ people have died .
And the league is also telling players to fist bump and @ @ @ @ @ taking items like pens , balls and jerseys to autograph .

The NBA sent a memo to its teams on Friday telling them to prepare for games without fans in attendance.
This is due to the coronavirus in the US.
As of Friday night — 335 people have tested positive for coronavirus in the US.
17 people have died.
BREAKING: The NBA has told teams that there’s a chance games in the future may be played without any fans in attendance due to the coronavirus. — Legion Hoops (@LegionHoops) March 7, 2020
And the league is also telling players to fist bump and not high five and avoid taking items like pens, balls and jerseys to autograph.
Reporting with @ZachLowe_NBA: In memo to teams on coronavirus, NBA suggests players choose fist-bumps over high-fives and avoid taking items such as pens, balls and jerseys to autograph. Teams also concerned about corona impact on pre-draft process. Story: https://t.co/dKZyDMZdVy — Adrian Wojnarowski (@wojespn) March 2, 2020
LeBron James ‘I ain’t playing‘ without an audience.