thelibertydaily--2020-10-03--Hate-Filled Ex-Obama, Hillary Staffers Attack President Trump: ‘I Hope He Dies’

You ’ d think that Zara Rahim , a former staff member of President Obama and Hillary Clinton would know that you can ’ t take anything back on the internet .
The former communications staffer got caught wishing death upon President Trump after the president announced that he and the first lady came down with the coronavirus .
“ It ’ s been against my moral identity to tweet this for the past four years , but , I hope he dies , ” she posted in a now-deleted tweet .
She surrounded the word “ dies ” with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ joined other “ Blue Check ” Trump-haters who wished the president harm and appeared to be downright gleeful when the announcement was made .
The White House insisted that the president and the first lady are doing well .
There are reports that the president has minor symptoms .
EDITOR ’ S NOTE : Social media is cracking down on Conservative content .
Many of you have complained that you never see our content in your news feeds .
There ’ s only one way to fight back — and that ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Click here .
Attorney George Conway , Kellyanne Conway ’ s husband , tried to nab the president on failing to protect the country and not even being able to “ protect himself.
” Rep. Rashida Tlaib , the “ Squad member ” whose biggest contribution to the national discourse was when she told supporters that Congress was “ going to impeach this motherf***er , ” called out the president for “ still ” not wearing a mask .
CLICK FOR THE LATEST ON THE CORONAVIRUS She took the Joe Biden line @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s debate and claimed the president “ only cares about himself and his life , NOT those around him or the people he took oath to protect .
Too many lives lost because of his deadly lies.
” Carl Quintanilla , the CNBC anchor , posted a video of Trump mocking Clinton for not being able to make it to her car because without assistance , and tried to mock the president by writing , “ This was four years ago today.
” One person responded , “ Wow , you ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” The diagnosis was any Trump-hater ’ s dream and further proved the point that “ Trump-Derangement Syndrome ” exists .
These critics are famous for marching in lockstep and this case was no different .
They theme was Trump deserves the virus due to his missteps and refusal to wear masks in public .
Andy Slavitt , the former Obama health care head , tweeted , “ He must be quarantining because he doesn ’ t want to pass the hoax on to anyone else.
” DEMS GET READY FOR ATTACK ON @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cox , who is apparently a congressional candidate in California , took to Twitter to ask , “ What If , in the end , both shitty candidates die and # COVID19 ends up saving the world ?
” One person responded , “ Steve , you ’ re better than that .
Come on.
” “ No I ’ m not .
I hope they both die , ” he responded .
Daniel Golson , the social media editor for Roadshow , reportedly tweeted , “ I don ’ t feel bad @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ve been hoping that since 2015.
” Lisa Curry , who describes herself as a comedian , wrote , “ I hope he suffers through this and dies as he ’ s losing on election night .
”

You’d think that Zara Rahim, a former staff member of President Obama and Hillary Clinton would know that you can’t take anything back on the internet.
The former communications staffer got caught wishing death upon President Trump after the president announced that he and the first lady came down with the coronavirus.
“It’s been against my moral identity to tweet this for the past four years, but, I hope he dies,” she posted in a now-deleted tweet. She surrounded the word “dies” with stars to stress the point.
WE’RE PRAYING FOR YOU, MR. PRESIDENT
Rahim joined other “Blue Check” Trump-haters who wished the president harm and appeared to be downright gleeful when the announcement was made. The White House insisted that the president and the first lady are doing well. There are reports that the president has minor symptoms.
EDITOR’S NOTE: Social media is cracking down on Conservative content. Many of you have complained that you never see our content in your news feeds. There’s only one way to fight back — and that’s by subscribing to my FREE weekly newsletter. Click here.
Attorney George Conway, Kellyanne Conway’s husband, tried to nab the president on failing to protect the country and not even being able to “protect himself.”
Rep. Rashida Tlaib, the “Squad member” whose biggest contribution to the national discourse was when she told supporters that Congress was “going to impeach this motherf***er,” called out the president for “still” not wearing a mask.
CLICK FOR THE LATEST ON THE CORONAVIRUS
She took the Joe Biden line of attack on the president from Tuesday’s debate and claimed the president “only cares about himself and his life, NOT those around him or the people he took oath to protect. Too many lives lost because of his deadly lies.”
Carl Quintanilla, the CNBC anchor, posted a video of Trump mocking Clinton for not being able to make it to her car because without assistance, and tried to mock the president by writing, “This was four years ago today.”
One person responded, “Wow, you’ve lost it Carl, really disappointing.”
The diagnosis was any Trump-hater’s dream and further proved the point that “Trump-Derangement Syndrome” exists. These critics are famous for marching in lockstep and this case was no different. They theme was Trump deserves the virus due to his missteps and refusal to wear masks in public.
Andy Slavitt, the former Obama health care head, tweeted, “He must be quarantining because he doesn’t want to pass the hoax on to anyone else.”
DEMS GET READY FOR ATTACK ON TRUMP’S SUPREME COURT PICK
Steve Cox, who is apparently a congressional candidate in California, took to Twitter to ask, “What If, in the end, both shitty candidates die and #COVID19 ends up saving the world?”
One person responded, “Steve, you’re better than that. Come on.”
“No I’m not. I hope they both die,” he responded.
Daniel Golson, the social media editor for Roadshow, reportedly tweeted, “I don’t feel bad about hoping he dies because I’ve been hoping that since 2015.”
Lisa Curry, who describes herself as a comedian, wrote, “I hope he suffers through this and dies as he’s losing on election night.”


thelibertydaily--2020-10-03--Democrat Megadonor Harvey Weinstein Faces 6 New Counts of Sexual Assault in LA

Oct. 2 ( UPI ) -- Former Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein faces six new charges of sexual assault related to multiple incidents more than a decade ago in Los Angeles , prosecutors announced Friday .
Los Angeles County District Attorney Jackie Lacey amended an existing criminal complaint against Weinstein to add three counts each of forcible rape and forcible oral copulation -- all felonies .
The existing criminal complaint accused him a single count each of forcible rape , forcible copulation and one count of sexual penetration by use of force , and two counts of sexual battery by restraint @ @ @ @ @ @ @ victims from 2004-13 .
`` I am thankful to the first women who reported these crimes and whose courage have given strength to others to come forward , '' Lacey said .
`` The willingness of these latest victims to testify against a powerful man gives us the additional evidence we need to build a compelling criminal case . ''
The new charges involve allegations he raped a woman at a Beverly Hills hotel room between September 2004 and September , and raped another woman on two occasions in November 2009 and November @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hotel .
If convicted on all counts in the Los Angeles case , Weinstein faces up to 140 years in prison .
He 's currently serving 23 years prison in New York after being convicted of a criminal sexual act and third-degree rape .
Los Angeles prosecutors are seeking Weinstein 's extradition from New York for him to face charges .
An extradition hearing was scheduled for Dec. 11 .

Harvey Weinstein arrives at Manhattan Supreme Court for Day 5 of deliberations in his rape trial February 24. He faces new sexual assault charges in Los Angeles. File Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo
Oct. 2 (UPI) -- Former Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein faces six new charges of sexual assault related to multiple incidents more than a decade ago in Los Angeles, prosecutors announced Friday. Los Angeles County District Attorney Jackie Lacey amended an existing criminal complaint against Weinstein to add three counts each of forcible rape and forcible oral copulation -- all felonies. Advertisement
The existing criminal complaint accused him a single count each of forcible rape, forcible copulation and one count of sexual penetration by use of force, and two counts of sexual battery by restraint. All told there are five alleged victims from 2004-13.
"I am thankful to the first women who reported these crimes and whose courage have given strength to others to come forward," Lacey said. "The willingness of these latest victims to testify against a powerful man gives us the additional evidence we need to build a compelling criminal case."
The new charges involve allegations he raped a woman at a Beverly Hills hotel room between September 2004 and September, and raped another woman on two occasions in November 2009 and November 2010, also at a Beverly Hills hotel.
Advertisement
If convicted on all counts in the Los Angeles case, Weinstein faces up to 140 years in prison. He's currently serving 23 years prison in New York after being convicted of a criminal sexual act and third-degree rape.
Los Angeles prosecutors are seeking Weinstein's extradition from New York for him to face charges. An extradition hearing was scheduled for Dec. 11.


thelibertydaily--2020-10-03--Democrat Senate Candidate John Hickenlooper Praises Communist China as a ‘Great Nation’

Colorado Senate hopeful John Hickenlooper praised China as a `` great nation '' deserving of American respect and told voters that the Chinese do not seek global dominance .
The former Democratic governor ignored China 's recent military saber-rattling , crackdowns in Hong Kong , and role in the coronavirus outbreak to laud the regime 's lack of ambition .
`` They do not want to rule the world , '' Hickenlooper told supporters on a Zoom call on Monday .
`` They do n't want to dominate .
They want to be safe and be respected as one of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which they are .
And we should–I think that 's what we should recognize . ''
Hickenlooper 's remarks are at odds with a bipartisan consensus emerging on Capitol Hill , as well as Chinese ruler Xi Jinping 's own rhetoric .
Since the coronavirus pandemic 's onset , Democrats and Republicans have targeted China 's malignant behavior and global ambitions , with both parties issuing reports on dangerous Chinese statecraft tools just this week .
Xi has explicitly said that he hopes China will be `` a global leader in terms of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by 2049 .
Experts assert this amounts to a call for a China-led world order .
Hickenlooper has maintained close ties with China over the course of his career .
He previously met with the Chinese People 's Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries , which Secretary of State Mike Pompeo calls `` the public face of the Chinese Communist Party 's official foreign influence agency . ''
The former Colorado governor has also interviewed with multiple Chinese state media outlets in the past few years , lauding the virtues of cooperation with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it comes to reciprocal trade .
Millions of dollars in American intellectual property theft comes from China , and yet Hickenlooper told Chinese state media that Washington should use a `` thumbtack '' to manage the Sino-American relationship , rather than a `` sledgehammer . ''
Hickenlooper 's opponent , incumbent senator Cory Gardner ( R. , Colo. ) , has emerged as a top critic of the Chinese regime since his 2014 election .
As an influential member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee , Gardner has made relationships with China rivals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of his tenure , even meeting with former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe in 2017 .
Gardner has also made national security readiness against China a significant part of his legislative efforts .
In recent months , Gardner made amendments on a NASA authorization act that bolster space technology protections against Chinese theft and authored language on a bill condemning human rights abuses in China .
In 2018 , Gardner 's subcommittee heard testimony from prominent voices in the Uighur community , and Gardner himself took Chinese ambassador to the United States Cui @ @ @ @ @ @ @ record .
Colorado 's state Republican Party said that foreign policy is a key area for voters , particularly as the federal government addresses the coronavirus pandemic .
Party spokesman Joe Jackson called on Hickenlooper to disavow his praise for the regime .
`` While Senator Gardner works to hold China accountable for stealing [ intellectual property ] and torturing Uighur Muslims , Hickenlooper has instead chosen to continue in his role as a useful tool in the belt of the Chinese Communist Party 's propaganda machine , '' he said .
`` @ @ @ @ @ @ @ human rights abuses or recognize their threat to American security proves that he is n't fit to hold a Senate seat . ''
The Hickenlooper campaign did not respond to a request for comment .

Colorado Senate hopeful John Hickenlooper praised China as a "great nation" deserving of American respect and told voters that the Chinese do not seek global dominance.
The former Democratic governor ignored China's recent military saber-rattling, crackdowns in Hong Kong, and role in the coronavirus outbreak to laud the regime's lack of ambition.
"They do not want to rule the world," Hickenlooper told supporters on a Zoom call on Monday. "They don't want to dominate. They want to be safe and be respected as one of the great nations of the world, which they are. And we should–I think that's what we should recognize."
Hickenlooper's remarks are at odds with a bipartisan consensus emerging on Capitol Hill, as well as Chinese ruler Xi Jinping's own rhetoric. Since the coronavirus pandemic's onset, Democrats and Republicans have targeted China's malignant behavior and global ambitions, with both parties issuing reports on dangerous Chinese statecraft tools just this week. Xi has explicitly said that he hopes China will be "a global leader in terms of comprehensive national power and international influence" by 2049. Experts assert this amounts to a call for a China-led world order.
Hickenlooper has maintained close ties with China over the course of his career. He previously met with the Chinese People's Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries, which Secretary of State Mike Pompeo calls "the public face of the Chinese Communist Party's official foreign influence agency." The former Colorado governor has also interviewed with multiple Chinese state media outlets in the past few years, lauding the virtues of cooperation with the Chinese Communist Party, especially as it comes to reciprocal trade. Millions of dollars in American intellectual property theft comes from China, and yet Hickenlooper told Chinese state media that Washington should use a "thumbtack" to manage the Sino-American relationship, rather than a "sledgehammer."
Hickenlooper's opponent, incumbent senator Cory Gardner (R., Colo.), has emerged as a top critic of the Chinese regime since his 2014 election. As an influential member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Gardner has made relationships with China rivals Japan and South Korea a major feature of his tenure, even meeting with former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe in 2017.
Gardner has also made national security readiness against China a significant part of his legislative efforts. In recent months, Gardner made amendments on a NASA authorization act that bolster space technology protections against Chinese theft and authored language on a bill condemning human rights abuses in China. In 2018, Gardner's subcommittee heard testimony from prominent voices in the Uighur community, and Gardner himself took Chinese ambassador to the United States Cui Tiankai to task on Beijing's human-rights record.
Colorado's state Republican Party said that foreign policy is a key area for voters, particularly as the federal government addresses the coronavirus pandemic. Party spokesman Joe Jackson called on Hickenlooper to disavow his praise for the regime.
"While Senator Gardner works to hold China accountable for stealing [intellectual property] and torturing Uighur Muslims, Hickenlooper has instead chosen to continue in his role as a useful tool in the belt of the Chinese Communist Party's propaganda machine," he said. "Hickenlooper's refusal to disavow China's human rights abuses or recognize their threat to American security proves that he isn't fit to hold a Senate seat."
The Hickenlooper campaign did not respond to a request for comment.


thelibertydaily--2020-10-02--Now Is the Time for the US to Take a Stronger Position Against the Chinese Communist Party

Now Is the Time for the US to Take a Stronger Position Against the CCP Ending the CCP should be the number one goal May President Donald Trump and Melania speedily recover from the CCP virus .
Their contracting it is a reminder to us all .
Their falling ill from this disease that the Chinese Communist Party ( CCP ) allowed to spread around the world underscores how close the CCP threat is to cutting out the heart of our nation .
The Trump administration has already taken an unprecedented level of action against the CCP , but it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the threat and defending our country from further damage .
There is still a lack of understanding that this is a life and death fight to save humanity .
During the 71 years of its rule , the CCP has always seen the United States as its number one enemy .
To the regime in Beijing , the very idea of freedom is an existential threat .
Because of this , it has built its economy and policies with a goal of beating America , at all costs , with no limit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ 50s , the CCP had a movement called “ The Great Leap Forward.
” It ’ s real aim was to try to catch up with the United States within ten years .
It resulted in a great famine that cost at least 30 million lives .
This disaster , however , never changed the CCP ’ s determination to compete with and beat the United States .
The CCP recruited U.S.-educated Chinese scientists to develop nuclear weapons .
In recent decades , despite huge investments from the United States and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the CCP ’ s goal has remained unchanged : to defeat the United States .
The CCP has long known that a strong America will ultimately result in the end of the CCP .
Communist ideology at its heart is against humanity , and the example of America ’ s principles and the idea of freedom would result in its demise .
This is why any engagement with the CCP , any negotiation , any trade agreement or other kind of agreements with the Chinese communist regime will fail .
You can ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , so to speak , nor should you acknowledge it as a normal entity .
America is strong because we are blessed .
We are blessed because we are bestowed with great responsibility .
We are at a historical moment where we either give in to the communists and let this cancer of communism take over the world , leading freedom and moral decency to perish , or we fight with the communists and save the world .
One thing is clear , Chinese people are ready for a country without communism .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Nine Commentaries on Chinese Communist Party ” in 2004 , hundreds of millions of Chinese people have been inspired to withdraw from the CCP and its affiliates .
Chinese people will forever be grateful if America ends the CCP soon .
While the Trump administration has taken a strong stance against Chinese infiltration , it is not clear yet that ending the CCP is the number one goal .
Just about all the problems we have internally or internationally are caused by the CCP .
Not enough people realize that the CCP @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than the Soviet Union ever was .
Trump has an opportunity to become to China , what President Reagan was to the Soviet Union .
The regime ’ s strategy is to use the state of crisis to tighten its grip over the nation by replicating the purges and policies of Mao Zedong , and with its chokehold on China unbreakable , to rise out from the state of crisis .
The Trump administration and many countries in the world have taken stronger stances against the CCP , but these are looking to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ protect the interests of each respective country .
While these are heavy blows to the Communist Party , they ’ re not strong enough to topple it , and in the greater scheme of things act as merely an inconvenience in the regime ’ s own strategies , which work on decades-long programs .
The impact of the trade war and other policies are ultimately only like a speed bump on the regime ’ s long road towards achieving its goal to overtake the United States .
Any policy short of ending the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ solution to a long-term problem , and will merely defer the crisis now facing the world to future generations , at a time when the CCP may not be in a weakened state , as it is now .
The China policy of the United States should be to recognize that the Chinese Communist Party is a murderous totalitarian regime with the blood of tens of millions of Chinese people on its hands .
It ’ s a regime that commits every atrocity that the free world has always claimed to oppose .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ export this style of ruling to every corner of the world .
Mr. Trump , tear down this regime , and secure the future of freedom not just for the United States , and not just for the free world , but for the Chinese people as well .
Diana Zhang , Ph.D. , is a staff writer with 20 years ’ experience in the study of China .
Based in the United States , she uses a pen name to protect her family members in China .

Commentary
May President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump speedily recover from the CCP virus. Their contracting it is a reminder to us all.
Their falling ill from this disease that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) allowed to spread around the world underscores how close the CCP threat has come to cutting out the heart of our nation.
The Trump administration has already taken an unprecedented level of action against the CCP, but this has been at the level of waking up to the threat and defending our country from further damage. There is still a lack of understanding that this is a life and death fight to save humanity.
During the 71 years of its rule, the CCP has always seen the United States as its No. 1 enemy. To the regime in Beijing, the very idea of freedom is an existential threat. Because of this, it has built its economy and policies with a goal of beating America, at any cost and with no limit on the methods used.
During the 1950s, the CCP pushed a movement called The Great Leap Forward. Its real aim was to try to catch up with the United States within 10 years, and its mad dash to do so resulted in a great famine that cost at least 30 million lives.
This disaster, however, never changed the CCP’s determination to compete with and beat the United States. The CCP recruited U.S.-educated Chinese scientists to develop nuclear weapons. In recent decades, despite huge investment from the United States and the great transfer of wealth and technology, the CCP’s goal has remained unchanged: to defeat the United States.
The CCP has long known that a strong America will ultimately result in the end of the Party. Communist ideology, at its heart, is against humanity, and the example of America’s principles and the idea of freedom would result in its demise.
This is why any engagement, any negotiation, or any other kind of agreement with the Chinese communist regime will fail. You can’t put your trust in the devil, so to speak, nor should you acknowledge it as a normal entity.
America is strong because we are blessed. We are blessed because we are bestowed with great responsibility. We are at a historical moment where we either give in to the communists and let this cancer of communism take over the world, leading freedom and moral decency to perish, or we fight the communists and save the world.
One thing is clear: The Chinese people are ready for a country without communism. Since The Epoch Times published the series “Nine Commentaries on the Chinese Communist Party” in 2004, more than 350 million Chinese people have been inspired to withdraw from the CCP and its affiliates. The Chinese people will forever be grateful if America ends the CCP soon.
While the Trump administration has taken a strong stance against Chinese infiltration, it's not clear yet that ending the CCP should be the No. 1 goal. Just about all the problems we have internally or internationally are caused by the CCP. Not enough people realize that the CCP is really life-threatening—and more vicious and sly than the Soviet Union ever was.
Trump has an opportunity to become to China what President Ronald Reagan was to the Soviet Union.
The regime’s strategy is to create a state of crisis by replicating the purges and policies of Mao Zedong, using them to tighten its grip over the nation, and, with its chokehold on China secured and unbreakable, to rise out from the crisis.
The Trump administration and the leadership of many other countries have taken stronger stances against the CCP, but these focus on ending the Party's unfair practices and protecting the interests of each respective country. While these are heavy blows to the CCP, they’re not strong enough to topple it and, in the greater scheme of things, act as merely an inconvenience to the regime’s strategies, which work on decades-long programs.
The trade war and other policies ultimately act as merely a speed bump on the regime’s long road toward achieving its goal to overtake the United States. Any policy short of ending the CCP will result in only a short-term solution to a long-term problem, deferring the crisis now facing the world to future generations, at a time when the CCP may not be in as weakened a state as it is now.
The United States' policy on China should recognize that the communist state is a murderous totalitarian regime with the blood of tens of millions of Chinese people on its hands. It’s a regime that commits every atrocity the free world has always claimed to oppose. And its publicly stated goal is to export this style of rule to every corner of the globe.
Mr. Trump, tear down this regime and secure the future of freedom not just for the United States, but for the Chinese people and the entire free world as well.
Diana Zhang, Ph.D., is a staff writer with 20 years’ experience in the study of China. Based in the United States, she uses a pen name to protect her family members in China.


thelibertydaily--2020-10-02--REPORT: Trump Campaign Beating Biden In Voter Registrations In Key States

For the sake of the 2020 election , both the Trump and Biden campaigns have been working hard to register voters , especially in swing states .
There were some states in 2016 which came down to just a few thousand votes , so no one wants to take a chance .
So far , the Trump campaign is winning the registration race .
Trump is winning the voter registration battle against Biden in key states In the last few weeks , Joe Biden has led President Donald Trump by a fairly consistent 8-point average in national polls and has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ states to win the Electoral College , including Arizona , Michigan , Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — all states Trump won in 2016 .
But there are signs Trump ’ s ground operation is paying off when it comes to registering new voters in key states , an advantage that could become important if the race tightens before Nov. 3 .
The Trump campaign has boasted that it knocks on more than a million doors a week , a claim that ’ s impossible to independently verify .
In sharp contrast , the Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ virtual outreach , citing Covid-19 concerns — even though academic research has routinely concluded door-to-door canvassing is the “ most consistently effective and efficient method of voter mobilization.
” Only just now has the Biden campaign decided to restart its in-person voter contacts in some battleground states .
As deadlines approach , new data from the past few months shows Republicans have swamped Democrats in adding new voters to the rolls , a dramatic GOP improvement over 2016 , even if new registrations have lagged 2016 rates across the board .
Trump is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Scott Presler , who are out there registering new voters all the time .
This could make all the difference in November .

For the sake of the 2020 election, both the Trump and Biden campaigns have been working hard to register voters, especially in swing states.
There were some states in 2016 which came down to just a few thousand votes, so no one wants to take a chance.
So far, the Trump campaign is winning the registration race.
NBC News reported:
Trump is winning the voter registration battle against Biden in key states
In the last few weeks, Joe Biden has led President Donald Trump by a fairly consistent 8-point average in national polls and has maintained leads in more than enough battleground states to win the Electoral College, including Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — all states Trump won in 2016.
POLL: Do You Think Trump Was The Real Winner Of The Election? Yes No Just show the results... Enter your email to see the results... Vote
Completing this poll entitles you to ProTrumpNews updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime with a single click. Here's the Privacy Policy.
But there are signs Trump’s ground operation is paying off when it comes to registering new voters in key states, an advantage that could become important if the race tightens before Nov. 3.
The Trump campaign has boasted that it knocks on more than a million doors a week, a claim that’s impossible to independently verify. In sharp contrast, the Biden campaign had ditched a ground game for virtual outreach, citing Covid-19 concerns — even though academic research has routinely concluded door-to-door canvassing is the “most consistently effective and efficient method of voter mobilization.” Only just now has the Biden campaign decided to restart its in-person voter contacts in some battleground states.
As deadlines approach, new data from the past few months shows Republicans have swamped Democrats in adding new voters to the rolls, a dramatic GOP improvement over 2016, even if new registrations have lagged 2016 rates across the board.
Trump is lucky to have some amazing supporters like Scott Presler, who are out there registering new voters all the time.
You have 5 days left to register new voters in AZ, FL, GA, OH, & TX. Make them count. — #ThePersistence (@ScottPresler) September 30, 2020
This voter & her husband just moved from Massachusetts to New Hampshire. +2 votes for @realDonaldTrump in NH pic.twitter.com/mXs2u4bACx — #ThePersistence (@ScottPresler) September 30, 2020
I’m knocking on doors for @realDonaldTrump because New Hampshire is winnable & flippable this November. In the last month, I’ve been to PA, CA, GA, MD, FL, NE, MI, OH, & NH. I will do everything within my power to win. pic.twitter.com/m4Q0vmgI1M — #ThePersistence (@ScottPresler) October 1, 2020
This could make all the difference in November.
Completing this poll entitles you to American Lookout updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime with a single click. Here's our Privacy Policy.


thelibertydaily--2020-10-03--Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot Shows Up At News Conference Sporting Bizarre Costume

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot 's dismal tenure has been marked by a dramatic rise in violence , the Jussie Smollett hate crime hoax , and full-frontal assaults against churches under the guise of public health and yet she is never held accountable by media .
As another of the crop of Dem politicians who got her job largely because of identity - she is both black and gay - Lightfoot continues to show that she is unqualified and unfit and on Thursday , she showed up at a news conference wearing a bizarre Halloween get-up .
***Get your Patriotic face @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 's presser was to announce that unlike Easter Sunday worship services , that she would not be canceling Halloween , and the masked `` Rona Destroyer '' wore a cape and passed out trick or treat candy .
Via ABC-7 Chicago , `` Halloween 2020 Chicago guidelines announced by Lightfoot the same day some COVID-19 restrictions ease '' : Trick-or-treating will be allowed in Chicago this Halloween , with some restrictions , Mayor Lori Lightfoot said Thursday .
Those going door-to-door can not be in groups larger than six , must `` keep @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Lightfoot 's Halloween announcement comes the same day COVID-19 restrictions are easing for Chicago businesses .
Classes at gyms can now include more people , and personal services that require a mask being removed , like shaves and facials , are now allowed .
The alcohol curfew for bars and restaurants is pushed back to 1 a.m .
Bars that do n't serve food will be able to seat people indoors at 25 % capacity , and those that do serve food can open at 40 % capacity , with a maximum of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in trick-or-treating should maintain social distance and wear proper face coverings ; consider leaving individual candies spaced apart outside ; trick-or-treat only with household members and wash hands before eating candy , the state said .
Lightfoot who is a dead ringer for Beetlejuice on any given day couldn ’ t possibly look any more ridiculous – but she did .
Download the FREE TrendingPolitics Mobile App so you never miss a Trump story The news that the Windy City would be allowing Halloween should be greeted with mixed feelings , especially since @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hit record levels .
Over 3,100 people have been shot in Mayor Lori Lightfoot ’ s ( D ) Chicago thus far in 2020 .
The Chicago Tribune reports the exact number of shooting victims at 3,132 , and that includes the fatally wounded as well as those who survived .
The Tribune reports the number of homicides January 1 , 2020 , through September 28 , 2020 , at 576 , CNN reported fewer than 500 for all of 2019 .
Breitbart News reported at least 49 people were shot over the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fatally .
Nearly 40 were shot , including six fatally , the weekend prior , and at least 50 were shot , 11 fatally , the weekend before that .
One would think that Mayor Lightfoot would have more urgent priorities than putting on the `` Rona Destroyer '' garb and prancing around for an adoring media but the violence in her city where citizens are under attack as if they lived in a third-world country does n't merit her full attention .
It is mind-boggling how this person could have ever gotten @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of America 's largest cities but if it was n't for low standards , Democrats would have no standards at all .
Democrats and especially the vaunted class of 2018 are incompetent authoritarian clowns and the coronavirus is the best thing that ever happened to them .

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot’s dismal tenure has been marked by a dramatic rise in violence, the Jussie Smollett hate crime hoax, and full-frontal assaults against churches under the guise of public health and yet she is never held accountable by media.
As another of the crop of Dem politicians who got her job largely because of identity – she is both black and gay – Lightfoot continues to show that she is unqualified and unfit and on Thursday, she showed up at a news conference wearing a bizarre Halloween get-up.
***Get your Patriotic face masks with FREE SHIPPING today***
Mayor Lightfoot’s presser was to announce that unlike Easter Sunday worship services, that she would not be canceling Halloween, and the masked “Rona Destroyer” wore a cape and passed out trick or treat candy.
Via ABC-7 Chicago, “Halloween 2020 Chicago guidelines announced by Lightfoot the same day some COVID-19 restrictions ease”:
"*" indicates required fields Would you rather........ * Eat ice cream with Joe Biden? Anything else......literally. Email * This poll subscribes you to our premium network of content. Unsubscribe at any time. Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Trick-or-treating will be allowed in Chicago this Halloween, with some restrictions, Mayor Lori Lightfoot said Thursday. Those going door-to-door cannot be in groups larger than six, must “keep it moving” and social distance. Lightfoot also outlined a new city event — Halloweek. Lightfoot’s Halloween announcement comes the same day COVID-19 restrictions are easing for Chicago businesses. Classes at gyms can now include more people, and personal services that require a mask being removed, like shaves and facials, are now allowed. The alcohol curfew for bars and restaurants is pushed back to 1 a.m. Bars that don’t serve food will be able to seat people indoors at 25% capacity, and those that do serve food can open at 40% capacity, with a maximum of 50 people per space. Illinois released its Halloween guidelines Wednesday amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Anyone participating in trick-or-treating should maintain social distance and wear proper face coverings; consider leaving individual candies spaced apart outside; trick-or-treat only with household members and wash hands before eating candy, the state said.
Lightfoot who is a dead ringer for Beetlejuice on any given day couldn’t possibly look any more ridiculous – but she did.
Download the FREE TrendingPolitics Mobile App so you never miss a Trump story
The news that the Windy City would be allowing Halloween should be greeted with mixed feelings, especially since the carnage in an already violent hellhole hit record levels.
Breitbart reports, “Over 3,100 Shooting Victims in Mayor Lightfoot’s Chicago this Year”:
Over 3,100 people have been shot in Mayor Lori Lightfoot’s (D) Chicago thus far in 2020. The Chicago Tribune reports the exact number of shooting victims at 3,132, and that includes the fatally wounded as well as those who survived. The Tribune reports the number of homicides January 1, 2020, through September 28, 2020, at 576, CNN reported fewer than 500 for all of 2019. Breitbart News reported at least 49 people were shot over the past weekend alone, at least seven fatally. Nearly 40 were shot, including six fatally, the weekend prior, and at least 50 were shot, 11 fatally, the weekend before that.
One would think that Mayor Lightfoot would have more urgent priorities than putting on the “Rona Destroyer” garb and prancing around for an adoring media but the violence in her city where citizens are under attack as if they lived in a third-world country doesn’t merit her full attention.
It is mind-boggling how this person could have ever gotten the job as the mayor of one of America’s largest cities but if it wasn’t for low standards, Democrats would have no standards at all.
Democrats and especially the vaunted class of 2018 are incompetent authoritarian clowns and the coronavirus is the best thing that ever happened to them.
Notice: This article may contain commentary that reflects the author's opinion.


thelibertydaily--2020-10-03--4 Facts on the Opinions of Ruth Bader Ginsburg That Leftists Wish They Could Forget

The passing of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg shocked the political world .
This was especially the case due to the timing of her death , less than two months before the 2020 election .
Supposedly in honor of her memory , many Democrats have argued against President Donald Trump and the Republicans filling her SCOTUS seat .
If Democrats truly wanted to honor Ginsburg ’ s memory , however , they should remember all of her beliefs , not just the ones that are politically convenient .
As it turns out , there are quite a few positions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ may find hard to accept .
Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Filling SCOTUS Seats : “ The President Has the Authority … Is Elected for 4 Years Not 3 Years ” Many Democrats are strangely arguing that it was unethical for Trump to nominate a Supreme Court justice in an election year .
TRENDING : Rochester ’ s Dem Mayor Who Proposed Partially Defunding Police Indicted on Two Felony Charges Ginsburg ’ s dying wish was reportedly “ that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed.
” This is the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2016 , however .
When Barack Obama was president and the Democrats wanted to fill the open SCOTUS seat left by the late Antonin Scalia , Ginsburg made the same argument Republicans are making today .
“ As you know , the president has the authority to name appointees to the Supreme Court , but he has to do so with the advice and consent of the Senate .
And if the Senate does not act , as this current Senate is not acting , what can be done about it ?
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at Georgetown Law School on Sept. 7 , 2016 , The Daily Wire reported .
“ Even if you could conceive of a testing lawsuit , what would the response be ?
‘ Well , you want us to vote ?
So we ’ ll vote no.
’ But I do think that cooler heads will prevail ; I hope sooner rather than later .
The president is elected for four years not three years , so the power that he has in year three continue into year four and maybe some members @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appreciate that that ’ s how it should be.
” Although Ginsburg was a staunch advocate of abortion , she has criticized the Supreme Court ’ s landmark 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade .
In her criticism , Ginsburg used the same argument that many conservatives make — a right to privacy doesn ’ t have anything to do with whether an unborn child has a right to life or not .
Ginsburg was , in fact , in favor of abortion rights for women .
In her mind , though , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but rather an equal rights issue .
“ The key to understanding Justice Ginsburg ’ s views on the constitutional right to abortion is that she sees it as a question of equal protection and not of privacy , ” Sonja West , a law professor at the University of Georgia , told The Washington Post in 2016 .
Although RBG was still opposed to pro-life policies , abortion advocates vehemently oppose any criticism of Roe v. Wade , a decision that has become almost like a religious tenet of the left at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pleased to learn RBG had spoken such blasphemy about their precious abortion rights .
She Was Against Packing the Supreme Court As the confirmation of Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court becomes increasingly inevitable , some Democrats are now suggesting that they will pack the court — thus adding to the total number of justices in order to dilute the impact of conservatives on the bench — in retaliation .
This definitely would not honor RBG ’ s memory , considering that she expressed her vehement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2019 interview with NPR .
“ Nine seems to be a good number .
It ’ s been that way for a long time , ” Ginsburg said .
“ I think it was a bad idea when President Franklin Roosevelt tried to pack the court.
” “ If anything would make the court look partisan , ” she continued , “ it would be that — one side saying , ‘ When we ’ re in power , we ’ re going to enlarge the number of judges , so we would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ way we want them to.
” In 2016 , then-San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick began kneeling for the national anthem because he believed that America was oppressing black people .
Like many conservatives and patriotic liberals , RBG considered this move by Kaepernick to be “ dumb and disrespectful .
“ I think it ’ s dumb and disrespectful .
I would have the same answer if you asked me about flag burning .
I think it ’ s a terrible thing to do , but I wouldn ’ t lock a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ginsburg said in October 2016 .
“ If they want to be stupid , there ’ s no law that should be preventive .
If they want to be arrogant , there ’ s no law that prevents them from that.
” “ What I would do is strongly take issue with the point of view that they are expressing when they do that.
” After receiving significant backlash for her comments , RBG acknowledged she should have used a different tone but nevertheless did not fully apologize for the remarks themselves .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ a book interview in which I was asked how I felt about Colin Kaepernick and other NFL players who refused to stand for the national anthem , ” she said in a statement .
“ Barely aware of the incident or its purpose , my comments were inappropriately dismissive and harsh .
I should have declined to respond.
” If only liberals knew these four facts about RBG , then they might think twice about praising her as their ultra-progressive hero .
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal .

The passing of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg shocked the political world. This was especially the case due to the timing of her death, less than two months before the 2020 election.
Supposedly in honor of her memory, many Democrats have argued against President Donald Trump and the Republicans filling her SCOTUS seat.
If Democrats truly wanted to honor Ginsburg’s memory, however, they should remember all of her beliefs, not just the ones that are politically convenient.
As it turns out, there are quite a few positions the late left-wing justice had that Democrats may find hard to accept.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Filling SCOTUS Seats: “The President Has the Authority … Is Elected for 4 Years Not 3 Years”
RBG: “The President is elected for 4 years not 3 years, so the powers that he has in year 3 continue into year 4. Maybe some members of the Senate will wake up & appreciate that that’s how it should be.” pic.twitter.com/xU2GucJwNk — Jewish Deplorable 🇺🇸 (@TrumpJew) September 21, 2020
Many Democrats are strangely arguing that it was unethical for Trump to nominate a Supreme Court justice in an election year.
Ginsburg’s dying wish was reportedly “that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed.”
This is the opposite of what she said back in 2016, however.
When Barack Obama was president and the Democrats wanted to fill the open SCOTUS seat left by the late Antonin Scalia, Ginsburg made the same argument Republicans are making today.
“As you know, the president has the authority to name appointees to the Supreme Court, but he has to do so with the advice and consent of the Senate. And if the Senate does not act, as this current Senate is not acting, what can be done about it?” the late justice said during a speech at Georgetown Law School on Sept. 7, 2016, The Daily Wire reported.
“Even if you could conceive of a testing lawsuit, what would the response be? ‘Well, you want us to vote? So we’ll vote no.’ But I do think that cooler heads will prevail; I hope sooner rather than later. The president is elected for four years not three years, so the power that he has in year three continue into year four and maybe some members of the Senate will wake up and appreciate that that’s how it should be.”
Ginsburg Criticized Roe v. Wade
Instead of just addressing the challenge to Texas law, #SCOTUS in Roe v. Wade “wrote an opinion that made every abortion restriction in the country illegal in one fell swoop.” Who criticized Roe on this basis? Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. https://t.co/pYe9oEm4PT — Ed Whelan (@EdWhelanEPPC) December 11, 2019
Although Ginsburg was a staunch advocate of abortion, she has criticized the Supreme Court’s landmark 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade.
In her criticism, Ginsburg used the same argument that many conservatives make — a right to privacy doesn’t have anything to do with whether an unborn child has a right to life or not.
Ginsburg was, in fact, in favor of abortion rights for women.
In her mind, though, abortion was not a privacy issue, but rather an equal rights issue.
“The key to understanding Justice Ginsburg’s views on the constitutional right to abortion is that she sees it as a question of equal protection and not of privacy,” Sonja West, a law professor at the University of Georgia, told The Washington Post in 2016.
Although RBG was still opposed to pro-life policies, abortion advocates vehemently oppose any criticism of Roe v. Wade, a decision that has become almost like a religious tenet of the left at this point.
Leftists would not be pleased to learn RBG had spoken such blasphemy about their precious abortion rights.
She Was Against Packing the Supreme Court
Ruth Bader Ginsburg comes down hard against Democrats “partisan” idea to pack the Supreme Court. She goes on to say: “If anything would make the court appear partisan it would be that” & “I’m not at all in favor (of court packing)” I… I agree with RBG. pic.twitter.com/zsvHfJaiP5 — Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) July 24, 2019
As the confirmation of Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court becomes increasingly inevitable, some Democrats are now suggesting that they will pack the court — thus adding to the total number of justices in order to dilute the impact of conservatives on the bench — in retaliation.
This definitely would not honor RBG’s memory, considering that she expressed her vehement opposition to packing the court in a 2019 interview with NPR.
“Nine seems to be a good number. It’s been that way for a long time,” Ginsburg said. “I think it was a bad idea when President Franklin Roosevelt tried to pack the court.”
“If anything would make the court look partisan,” she continued, “it would be that — one side saying, ‘When we’re in power, we’re going to enlarge the number of judges, so we would have more people who would vote the way we want them to.”
RBG Called Kaepernick’s Anthem Kneeling ‘Dumb and Disrespectful’
Ruth Bader Ginsburg called Colin Kaepernick’s NFL protest “dumb and disrespectful.” pic.twitter.com/4Oin4hbWZ1 — JT Lewis (@thejtlewis) September 20, 2020
In 2016, then-San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick began kneeling for the national anthem because he believed that America was oppressing black people.
Like many conservatives and patriotic liberals, RBG considered this move by Kaepernick to be “dumb and disrespectful.
“I think it’s dumb and disrespectful. I would have the same answer if you asked me about flag burning. I think it’s a terrible thing to do, but I wouldn’t lock a person up for doing it,” Ginsburg said in October 2016.
“If they want to be stupid, there’s no law that should be preventive. If they want to be arrogant, there’s no law that prevents them from that.”
“What I would do is strongly take issue with the point of view that they are expressing when they do that.”
After receiving significant backlash for her comments, RBG acknowledged she should have used a different tone but nevertheless did not fully apologize for the remarks themselves.
“Some of you have inquired about a book interview in which I was asked how I felt about Colin Kaepernick and other NFL players who refused to stand for the national anthem,” she said in a statement. “Barely aware of the incident or its purpose, my comments were inappropriately dismissive and harsh. I should have declined to respond.”
If only liberals knew these four facts about RBG, then they might think twice about praising her as their ultra-progressive hero.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.


thelibertydaily--2020-10-03--GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz: ‘Business Is Usual at the White House and the President Is Still Making the Dec

GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz: ‘Business Is Usual at the White House and the President Is Still Making the Decisions’

Friday on Fox News Channel ’ s “ Tucker Carlson Tonight , ” Rep. Matt Gaetz ( R-FL ) said business was “ usual ” at the White House despite President Donald Trump having been transferred to Walter Reed Medical Center after testing positive for COVID-19 .
Gaetz expressed his disappointment with vitriolic reactions from some on social media but added that sources at the White House had revealed to him Trump was still in charge .
“ Whether it is the President of the United States or a beloved family member , we would always want to show empathy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or maybe in need of a weekend off to recover , ” he said .
“ Instead , what we ’ ve seen are vitriol , hatred .
Some of the things we have seen are so disgusting that people are willing to post online on social media , literally hoping that someone die .
I can ’ t imagine there is any person I ’ ve disagreed with politically that I would wish that outcome on.
” “ I just wish when the President does resume his campaign activities and his other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ back to winning for the American people again , ” Gaetz added .
“ I can tell you talking to a number of White House officials , business is usual at the White House and the President is still making the decisions .
It ’ s one of the reasons he is so charming to the country — because he is in command , he is in control , and he has made very clear even from his offices at Walter Reed , that will continue to be the case .
”

Friday on Fox News Channel’s “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) said business was “usual” at the White House despite President Donald Trump having been transferred to Walter Reed Medical Center after testing positive for COVID-19.
Gaetz expressed his disappointment with vitriolic reactions from some on social media but added that sources at the White House had revealed to him Trump was still in charge.
“Whether it is the President of the United States or a beloved family member, we would always want to show empathy for someone who is a little ill or maybe in need of a weekend off to recover,” he said. “Instead, what we’ve seen are vitriol, hatred. Some of the things we have seen are so disgusting that people are willing to post online on social media, literally hoping that someone die. I can’t imagine there is any person I’ve disagreed with politically that I would wish that outcome on.”
“I just wish when the President does resume his campaign activities and his other activities that we’ll be right back to winning for the American people again,” Gaetz added. “I can tell you talking to a number of White House officials, business is usual at the White House and the President is still making the decisions. It’s one of the reasons he is so charming to the country — because he is in command, he is in control, and he has made very clear even from his offices at Walter Reed, that will continue to be the case.”
Follow Jeff Poor on Twitter @jeff_poor


thelibertydaily--2020-10-04--Bill Clinton Juanita Broaddrick: ‘I Think It’s Time to Send Chris Wallace to CNN, He Has Earned It’

As was reported on earlier by Washington News , Trump supporter Juanita Broaddrick joined the chorus of people calling for Chris Wallace ’ s removal from Fox News following Tuesday ’ s debate .
“ I think it ’ s time to send Chris Wallace to CNN .
He has earned it , ” she said in a tweet the day after the debate .
She followed it up with a tweet that said , “ I ’ m voting in person for President Trump on November 3rd .
How bout you ?
” The next day , she retweeted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the next day after the debate and continued her criticism , saying , “ Wallace is a self absorbed hack.
” Yesterday , Broaddrick took a screenshot of Wallace on Fox News and said , “ Of course….. this POS making derogatory remarks this am about the First Family not wearing masks after they were seated at the debate .
His hate for Trump is sickening .
Chris Wallace is despicable.
” A video shared earlier of Wallace appearing on The Fox Report with Jon Scott today has received over 3,000 thumbs downs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ far .
Many comments left on the video are critical of Wallace with some pledging not to watch Fox News until Wallace is removed .

As was reported on earlier by Washington News, Trump supporter Juanita Broaddrick joined the chorus of people calling for Chris Wallace’s removal from Fox News following Tuesday’s debate.
“I think it’s time to send Chris Wallace to CNN. He has earned it,” she said in a tweet the day after the debate. She followed it up with a tweet that said, “I’m voting in person for President Trump on November 3rd. How bout you?”
I think it’s time to send Chris Wallace to CNN.
He has earned it. — Juanita Broaddrick (@atensnut) October 1, 2020
I’m voting in person for President Trump on November 3rd.
How bout you? — Juanita Broaddrick (@atensnut) October 1, 2020
The next day, she retweeted a story about Wallace’s reaction the next day after the debate and continued her criticism, saying, “Wallace is a self absorbed hack.”
Wallace is a self absorbed hack.
Chris Wallace says Trump 'bears the primary responsibility for what happened' at debate | TheHill https://t.co/8F23ImB3k8 — Juanita Broaddrick (@atensnut) October 1, 2020
Yesterday, Broaddrick took a screenshot of Wallace on Fox News and said, “Of course….. this POS making derogatory remarks this am about the First Family not wearing masks after they were seated at the debate. His hate for Trump is sickening. Chris Wallace is despicable.”
Of course….. this POS making derogatory remarks this am about the First Family not wearing masks after they were seated at the debate.
His hate for Trump is sickening.
Chris Wallace is despicable. pic.twitter.com/JH2xNK58p4 — Juanita Broaddrick (@atensnut) October 2, 2020
A video shared earlier of Wallace appearing on The Fox Report with Jon Scott today has received over 3,000 thumbs downs and less than 1,000 thumbs up so far.
Many comments left on the video are critical of Wallace with some pledging not to watch Fox News until Wallace is removed.


thelibertydaily--2020-10-04--Fast Kamala, VP Pence Will Sit 12 Feet Apart at Vice Presidential Debate at Request of Biden Campaig

Fast Kamala, VP Pence Will Sit 12 Feet Apart at Vice Presidential Debate at Request of Biden Campaign

Vice President Mike Pence and Democratic vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris will sit 12 feet apart at their upcoming debate—double the amount recommended by American public health officials under normal circumstances—a development that comes after multiple White House officials including President Trump tested positive for COVID-19 .
Biden ’ s camp reportedly expressed concern over the debate 's original spacing arrangements , arguing that medical guidelines dictate that individuals spending extended periods of time together be spaced even farther apart than the normal six-feet barrier .
The debate will last 90 minutes .
The requests from Biden 's camp were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 test early Friday morning .
Multiple other Republican politicians since then have revealed positive coronavirus infections .
The concept of “ social distancing ” became ubiquitous throughout much of the world over the past ten months as many health officials insisted that most individuals need to be spaced far apart from each other in order to prevent COVID-19 from spreading .
Though much of American life this year has been re-organized to accommodate six feet of space between individuals in many social settings , the six-foot maxim is not a universal figure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a little over three feet of distance ; German authorities , on the other hand , have recommended a distance of just under five feet .

Vice President Mike Pence and Democratic vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris will sit 12 feet apart at their upcoming debate—double the amount recommended by American public health officials under normal circumstances—a development that comes after multiple White House officials including President Trump tested positive for COVID-19.
Biden’s camp reportedly expressed concern over the debate's original spacing arrangements, arguing that medical guidelines dictate that individuals spending extended periods of time together be spaced even farther apart than the normal six-feet barrier. The debate will last 90 minutes.
The requests from Biden's camp were reportedly lodged before Trump revealed his positive COVID-19 test early Friday morning. Multiple other Republican politicians since then have revealed positive coronavirus infections.
The concept of “social distancing” became ubiquitous throughout much of the world over the past ten months as many health officials insisted that most individuals need to be spaced far apart from each other in order to prevent COVID-19 from spreading.
Though much of American life this year has been re-organized to accommodate six feet of space between individuals in many social settings, the six-foot maxim is not a universal figure. The World Health Organization recommends just a little over three feet of distance; German authorities, on the other hand, have recommended a distance of just under five feet.


thelibertydaily--2020-10-04--Conspiracy Of Silence: ‘Extra’ Mailed-out Ballots Showing Up Everywhere . . . Where Is The ‘News’?

As you read this , a few questions should probably cross your mind .
Including why so few Democrats acknowledge getting these extra ballots .
Here are some other questions to keep in mind .
If a citizen ’ s ballot goes to another person , doesn ’ t that disenfranchise the first citizen ?
Trending : Dear Wicked Leaders : God ’ s Arrows Have Your Name On Them Are votes being illicitly cast and counted ?
Does anyone really believe that Republicans are mysteriously getting all of these extra votes , and not their Democrat counterparts ?
If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they not ringing any alarm bells ?
Why have Democrats fought tooth and nail in court against purging voter rolls which would have minimized situations like this one ?
Is it in any way related to the fact that a surplus of names on the rolls makes it harder to detect voter fraud ?
Does anything throw the election into greater doubt ( and then chaos ) than scenarios like this one ?
Suppose were able to identify 100 % of the illegitimate votes and destroy them — do people scream in outrage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ being denied their voice ’ ?
We know the answer to some of these questions , surely .
Now let ’ s look at what ’ s showing up in the mail .
Do THESE stories So , D.C… how ’ s that workin ’ out for ya ?
California Attorney and frequent Fox News guest , Harmeet Dhillon related an incident with her D.C. lawyer friend : Director of Christian Ethics and Biblical Worldview at the Family Research Council : Chief of Staff to the GOP Whip : Speaking of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Barton , also had problems : Here ’ s an interesting one — an election law attorney with the National Republican Senatorial Committee : Nathan Brand who is with communications for the National Republican Senatorial Committee : Here is the former Chief Counsel for Nominations to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley ( R-IA ) and a former Law Clerk to Justice Gorsuch : The former Press Secretary for Senator Kevin Cramer ( R-ND ) : It ’ s also happening to the Average Americans : Is there any evidence at all that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for personal or political gain ?
Well , there was this ONE story about Ilhan Omar ’ s team being involved in voter fraud… But we already know from the media silence that it isn ’ t newsworthy , right ?

As you read this, a few questions should probably cross your mind. Including why so few Democrats acknowledge getting these extra ballots.
Here are some other questions to keep in mind.
If a citizen’s ballot goes to another person, doesn’t that disenfranchise the first citizen?
Are people voting twice?
Are votes being illicitly cast and counted?
Does anyone really believe that Republicans are mysteriously getting all of these extra votes, and not their Democrat counterparts? If Democrats are getting them too, are they not ringing any alarm bells?
Why have Democrats fought tooth and nail in court against purging voter rolls which would have minimized situations like this one? Is it in any way related to the fact that a surplus of names on the rolls makes it harder to detect voter fraud?
Does anything throw the election into greater doubt (and then chaos) than scenarios like this one?
Suppose were able to identify 100% of the illegitimate votes and destroy them — do people scream in outrage about all of these hypothetical people supposedly ‘being denied their voice’?
We know the answer to some of these questions, surely. Now let’s look at what’s showing up in the mail. Do THESE stories
The DC media keep pretending like we don’t have a voting by mail crisis. They purposefully interchange absentee voting (someone specially requests a ballot) with mass ballots sent to people who didn’t request the ballot. https://t.co/te3c4YIYxo — Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) September 27, 2020
. @samstein ignores this problem. He just wants to pick up ballots without security systems in place. DC types want loose rules. https://t.co/fekqkvd1Cr — Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) October 1, 2020
PSA — ballots are only being mass-mailed to all registered voters in 8 states and DC. It is *not happening* in 42 of the 50 states. — Steven Portnoy (@stevenportnoy) September 24, 2020
Correction! It's 9 states plus DC. I didn't mean to leave you out, Hawaii. — Steven Portnoy (@stevenportnoy) September 24, 2020
D.C. is very excited:
This is not a drill, people!
Ballots start arriving TODAY! Completed ballots can be mailed, placed in drop boxes, or returned to any polling place: see map at https://t.co/aupttx3glU (Screengrab is from the helpful @usps Informed Delivery daily preview email—sign up for it!) pic.twitter.com/fJYeJqrPhX — Council of DC (@councilofdc) September 29, 2020
So, D.C… how’s that workin’ out for ya?
Seems like DC Board of Elections is sending absentee ballots to people who no longer live at the locations they were sent too ? pic.twitter.com/59Llm97vdg — Students For Trump (@TrumpStudents) October 1, 2020
Abigail Monroe, part of the Trump War Room’s Rapid Response team gathered a thread:
THREAD: A lot of folks in DC are receiving incorrect & unsolicited ballots. Compiling a thread here so @MayorBowser @MurielBowser can address the potential for fraud & voter disenfranchisement. Please feel free to DM me if you received in incorrect ballot & I will include. — Abigail Marone ?? (@abigailmarone) October 1, 2020
"We’ve received 5 absentee ballots so far to this address, all in other people’s names." https://t.co/YVDT2WHsiN pic.twitter.com/C45ZkAntJL — Abigail Marone ?? (@abigailmarone) October 1, 2020
INBOX: DC resident received 2 ballots for voters who do not live with them. Even weirder, it looks like the ballots are addressed to the same person…? pic.twitter.com/DkM3sZkJt5 — Abigail Marone ?? (@abigailmarone) October 1, 2020
INBOX: Here are the ballots I received. 1 for me, 2 for people I’ve never met. (I’ve lived at this address for 3 years.) pic.twitter.com/47vKAeTImP — Abigail Marone ?? (@abigailmarone) October 1, 2020
California Attorney and frequent Fox News guest, Harmeet Dhillon related an incident with her D.C. lawyer friend:
Lawyer friend in DC received ballot of his predecessor in his apartment, as well as his own, this week. The prior tenant moved out of DC eighteen months ago. My friend won't vote that ballot because he isn't a criminal. How many other DC residents have the same scruples? #fraud pic.twitter.com/NQDwe0aEpS — Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) October 1, 2020
Director of Christian Ethics and Biblical Worldview at the Family Research Council:
Exhibit A in why sending out ballots to everyone on the voter roll is problematic. I just received five ballots at my house in Washington DC. Some of these people haven't lived here in years. This is crazy. pic.twitter.com/M0pKpIsKPn — David Closson (@DavidClosson) September 29, 2020
Chief of Staff to the GOP Whip:
Not a DC registered voter or resident. And here are two ballots for two different addresses, just delivered to my house by my friendly neighborhood postal worker. But sure, nothing to see here. pic.twitter.com/ARQmOC44C8 — Brett Horton (@bretthhorton) October 1, 2020
Fox News commentator Gayle Trotter:
Me receiving ballots from DC this fall pic.twitter.com/ZSwU6dUgMM — Gayle Trotter (@gayletrotter) October 1, 2020
The Daily Caller’s White House Correspondent Anders Hagstrom:
I received two ballots in the mail for people who no longer live in my apartment today. If this keeps happening, Biden just might win Washington, DC. pic.twitter.com/govboDL2Bo — Anders Hagstrom (@Hagstrom_Anders) October 1, 2020
Daily Caller videographer Richie McGinnis:
My official ballot arrived! Along with ballots for four people who no longer live here (three of whom haven’t lived here in over SIX years)! pic.twitter.com/cO0MAC2HpC — Richie?McG? (@RichieMcGinniss) September 30, 2020
Another Daily Caller reporter:
Not a DC registered voter or resident. And here are two ballots for two different addresses, just delivered to my house by my friendly neighborhood postal worker. But sure, nothing to see here. pic.twitter.com/ARQmOC44C8 — Brett Horton (@bretthhorton) October 1, 2020
Speaking of the Daily Caller, the Editor-In-Chief, Ethan Barton, also had problems:
Also, I never received my new voter card after changing my registration when I moved. Last I checked online, my old address was still listed. But then I got a notice delivered here with my current address saying I’d receive a ballot. Will I receive my ballot? Time will tell. — Ethan Barton (@ethanrbarton) September 30, 2020
Here’s an interesting one — an election law attorney with the National Republican Senatorial Committee:
I don’t know who Lindsay is, but I received her ballot yesterday. pic.twitter.com/Qb5RvCO70K — Darby Wade Grant (@DarbyGrant) October 1, 2020
Nathan Brand who is with communications for the National Republican Senatorial Committee:
A Washington, DC friend had EIGHT ballots sent to her apartment. ZERO ballots were for the current resident. https://t.co/DIfBKghfvU pic.twitter.com/mvWhHWuAmL — Nathan Brand (@NathanBrandWA) October 1, 2020
Conservative opinion writer Kaylee McGhee:
Here is the former Chief Counsel for Nominations to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and a former Law Clerk to Justice Gorsuch:
Dear DC Board of Elections: You mailed this “absentee ballot” to my home. While I never knew this former resident, I know she’s very absent. She’s been dead for 7 years. Sincerely,
Concerned Voter pic.twitter.com/dNQJ5oRR6s — ?? Mike Davis ?? (@mrddmia) October 1, 2020
The former Press Secretary for Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND):
today me and my roommates received two official ballots for people who don’t live here. what could go wrong!!?! pic.twitter.com/RuLUxaNg6z — Delanie Bomar (@DelanieBomar) September 30, 2020
It’s also happening to the Average Americans:
Just received an official ballot:
The only issue is that no Amy lives here and has not in over a year! pic.twitter.com/HAN3ReMC4s — Noah Evans – Text TRUMP to 88022 (@noahevvans) October 1, 2020
There are FOUR people in my household, but I just received FIVE unsolicited mail-in ballots from the DC Board of Elections. I’m voting in person, at my polling place, on Election Day. What if I wasn’t an honest person? This is not right. Thanks. God bless. pic.twitter.com/6k7nzryCHo — Eric Sims (@EricSim51887540) September 30, 2020
I got a second mail-in ballot that wasn’t mine yesterday lol great job DC — Rose Laoutaris (@RoseLaoutaris) October 1, 2020
Only one person at this residence. One addressed to a deceased individual who died in 2008, and other to her out of state widower. pic.twitter.com/JNLrT0prQN — King Acme (@King_Acme) September 30, 2020
Two official ballots got delivered to my apartment today in DC for people who haven’t lived here for years. This is probably fine. pic.twitter.com/qcxnLE5XR0 — Tyler Coward (@tylercoward) October 1, 2020
Is there any evidence at all that such surpluses of ballots can be exploited for personal or political gain?
Well, there was this ONE story about Ilhan Omar’s team being involved in voter fraud…
Project Veritas: Ilhan Omar Cash-For-Votes Ballot Harvesting Scheme
But we already know from the media silence that it isn’t newsworthy, right?


thelibertydaily--2020-10-04--Incumbent Democrat Lois Frankel Accused of Violating House Ethics and FEC Statues

The Federal Elections Commission ( FEC ) strictly prohibits the use of official congressional legislative resources to be used for any and all campaign practices by the respective member of the U.S. Congress .
Florida Rep. Lois Frankel ( D ) is being accused by her Republican congressional opponent Laura Loomer , who said that Rep. Frankel has admitted to “ using her taxpayer-funded congressional office to campaign.
” “ It ’ s unfortunate that Lois Frankel sees her job as all about politics as opposed to serving the people of District 21 .
Her admission of using her taxpayer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ questions regarding House Ethics rules and federal statutes preventing the use of government resources for campaigning ” , said Laura Loomer The allegation against Frankel comes from an interview the lawmaker gave to Forward.com where she all-but said that her congressional office and campaign are one and the same .
take our poll - story continues below “ My campaign is me doing my job .
I don ’ t have a separate program of me vs. the campaign , ” said Frankel .
The FEC website clearly states that “ Official resources @ @ @ @ @ @ @ general rule , be used for the performance of official business of the House , and hence those resources may not be used for campaign or political purpose.
” If Frankel ’ s campaign is really doing her job as she states , and if there really isn ’ t a separation between her campaign and her official office , then Frankel has violated FEC law and could face criminal charges for knowingly breaking federal statute .

The Federal Elections Commission (FEC) strictly prohibits the use of official congressional legislative resources to be used for any and all campaign practices by the respective member of the U.S. Congress.
Florida Rep. Lois Frankel (D) is being accused by her Republican congressional opponent Laura Loomer, who said that Rep. Frankel has admitted to “using her taxpayer-funded congressional office to campaign.”
“It’s unfortunate that Lois Frankel sees her job as all about politics as opposed to serving the people of District 21. Her admission of using her taxpayer funded congressional office to campaign raises legal questions regarding House Ethics rules and federal statutes preventing the use of government resources for campaigning”, said Laura Loomer
The allegation against Frankel comes from an interview the lawmaker gave to Forward.com where she all-but said that her congressional office and campaign are one and the same.
“My campaign is me doing my job. I don’t have a separate program of me vs. the campaign,” said Frankel.
The FEC website clearly states that “Official resources of the House must, as a general rule, be used for the performance of official business of the House, and hence those resources may not be used for campaign or political purpose.”
If Frankel’s campaign is really doing her job as she states, and if there really isn’t a separation between her campaign and her official office, then Frankel has violated FEC law and could face criminal charges for knowingly breaking federal statute.


thelibertydaily--2020-10-04--President Trump Releases 4-Minute Video From Walter Read — Looks Good Despite MSM Report His Vitals

President Trump Releases 4-Minute Video From Walter Read — Looks Good Despite MSM Report His Vitals are ‘Very Concerning’

After the media reported that the President ’ s vitals are “ very concerning , ” he spoke on a 4-minute video from Walter Reed Medical Center and sounded good .
You can watch the video at the end .
It is clear he is not out of danger yet .
Minutes after White House physician Sean Conley gave reporters a rosy report on President Trump ’ s condition battling the COVID-19 China coronavirus at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda , Maryland , an anonymous quote was sent to pool reporters stating the President ’ s condition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Pooler passes along these comments on background from a source familiar with the president ’ s health .
“ The president ’ s vitals over the last 24 hours were very concerning and the next 48 hours will be critical in terms of his care .
We ’ re still not on a clear path to a full recovery .
The Associated Press identified Chief of Staff Mark Meadows as the source .
Every reporter is repeating it as if they all heard the source .
The President ’ s physician @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s vitals are great .
Dr. Conley did correct the record about oxygen and said that President Trump was given oxygen on Friday morning before leaving on Marine One .
That may be standard protocol , CBS News stated .
Press secretary Kayleigh McEnany corrected the doctor ’ s statement about President Trump having a COV diagnosis for 72 hours .
It was not 72 hours .
He received the diagnosis late Thursday .
The doctor meant this was day 3 , not 72 hours .
President Trump says he is feeling @ @ @ @ @ @ @ video minutes ago at about 7 pm EST and he sounds good .

Update: Chief of Staff Meadows said this morning the President had taken a turn for the worse for a short while but is doing well now. His doctor says he might leave the hospital as early as Monday.
After the media reported that the President’s vitals are “very concerning,” he spoke on a 4-minute video from Walter Reed Medical Center and sounded good. You can watch the video at the end.
It is clear he is not out of danger yet.
Minutes after White House physician Sean Conley gave reporters a rosy report on President Trump’s condition battling the COVID-19 China coronavirus at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland, an anonymous quote was sent to pool reporters stating the President’s condition was worse than said at the briefing.
“Pooler passes along these comments on background from a source familiar with the president’s health. “The president’s vitals over the last 24 hours were very concerning and the next 48 hours will be critical in terms of his care. We’re still not on a clear path to a full recovery.
The Associated Press identified Chief of Staff Mark Meadows as the source. Every reporter is repeating it as if they all heard the source.
The President’s physician Dr. Conley said earlier that the President’s vitals are great.
Dr. Conley made a few errors, now corrected
Dr. Conley did correct the record about oxygen and said that President Trump was given oxygen on Friday morning before leaving on Marine One. That may be standard protocol, CBS News stated.
President’s vitals are very good LIVE: President Trump’s doctor provides an update after COVID-19 diagnosis, hospitalization pic.twitter.com/Pv9UH5FdYa — W.E. Dupree (@WayneDupreeShow) October 3, 2020
Press secretary Kayleigh McEnany corrected the doctor’s statement about President Trump having a COV diagnosis for 72 hours. It was not 72 hours. He received the diagnosis late Thursday. The doctor meant this was day 3, not 72 hours.
NEW memo from Trump’s physician pic.twitter.com/DxjDuC8b9j — Jason Leopold (@JasonLeopold) October 3, 2020
President Trump says he is feeling well
Mid-afternoon, the President posted this tweet.
Doctors, Nurses and ALL at the GREAT Walter Reed Medical Center, and others from likewise incredible institutions who have joined them, are AMAZING!!!Tremendous progress has been made over the last 6 months in fighting this PLAGUE. With their help, I am feeling well! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 3, 2020
President Trump just put out a video minutes ago at about 7 pm EST and he sounds good.
Watch:
Related


thelibertydaily--2020-10-04--Godless Heathens Sue Over ‘So Help Me God’ Language on Alabama Voter Registration Form

MONTGOMERY , Ala. — Four atheists have filed a federal lawsuit to challenge language on Alabama ’ s voter registration form that includes an oath ending with “ So help me God.
” “ The Alabama Secretary of State is violating basic First Amendment freedoms by unconstitutionally compelling Alabama — and United States — citizens who want to register to vote to swear ‘ so help me God ’ in violation of their conscience , ” the lawsuit , filed by the Freedom From Religion Foundation ( FFRF ) , states .
“ The Plaintiffs seek to ensure that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ individuals who are unable to swear ‘ so help me God ’ to be able to register to vote.
” According to the complaint , one of the atheists contacted the office of Secretary of State John Merrill to inquire if they could register to vote without signing their name to an oath that includes “ so help me God.
” “ There is not a legal mechanism to register to vote in AL without signing the oath as it is stated , ” Director of Elections Clay Helms responded .
“ If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ board of registrars in your county will reject the application and ask you to re-submit.
” FFRF also sent a letter to the office to assert that the inclusion of the phrase is unconstitutional because it violates the First Amendment ’ s prohibition on “ respecting an establishment of religion.
” The group opined that the phrase must either be removed or a separate form must be provided for those who do not wish to swear to God .
Attorney Hugh Evans replied , contending that any changes to the form “ would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of State and the State of Alabama have no valid reason or interest in requiring all voters to take an oath that requires them to swear ‘ so help me God , ' ” the lawsuit states .
“ County registrars and the State of Alabama have adequate means of ensuring the truthfulness of voter information without requiring voters to violate their conscience by swearing ‘ so help me God , ' ” it claims .
“ Indeed , the information provided by voters is objectively either correct or incorrect , regardless of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the court to declare the inclusion a violation of the Establishment , Free Exercise , Free Speech , and Equal Protection Clauses and to order the state to make forms available that don ’ t include the phrase .
As previously reported , earlier this year , a French-born woman who lives in Massachusetts has lost her appeal effort to have the phrase “ so help me God ” removed from the United States naturalization oath , as the First Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that its inclusion is not unconstitutional .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ court noted that the woman could simply not say the phrase , it noted that “ there is an established history of invocations of God in public oaths and statements tracing back to the founding era.
” The panel pointed to the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in American Legion v. American Humanist Association , which found that removing public faith-based displays could “ strike many as aggressively hostile to religion ” and would therefore not be neutral as the Constitution requires .
The preamble to the 1861 Alabama Constitution mentions God , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the State of Alabama , having separated ourselves from the government known as the United States of America , and being now by our representatives in Convention assembled , and acting in our sovereign and independent character , in order to establish justice , insure domestic tranquility , and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity — invoking the favor and guidance of Almighty God — do ordain and establish the following Constitution and form of government for the State of Alabama .
”

MONTGOMERY, Ala. — Four atheists have filed a federal lawsuit to challenge language on Alabama’s voter registration form that includes an oath ending with “So help me God.”
“The Alabama Secretary of State is violating basic First Amendment freedoms by unconstitutionally compelling Alabama — and United States — citizens who want to register to vote to swear ‘so help me God’ in violation of their conscience,” the lawsuit, filed by the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF), states.
“The Plaintiffs seek to ensure that the Secretary of State provides forms that allow individuals who are unable to swear ‘so help me God’ to be able to register to vote.”
According to the complaint, one of the atheists contacted the office of Secretary of State John Merrill to inquire if they could register to vote without signing their name to an oath that includes “so help me God.”
“There is not a legal mechanism to register to vote in AL without signing the oath as it is stated,” Director of Elections Clay Helms responded. “If you cross out a portion, the board of registrars in your county will reject the application and ask you to re-submit.”
FFRF also sent a letter to the office to assert that the inclusion of the phrase is unconstitutional because it violates the First Amendment’s prohibition on “respecting an establishment of religion.” The group opined that the phrase must either be removed or a separate form must be provided for those who do not wish to swear to God.
Attorney Hugh Evans replied, contending that any changes to the form “would require legislative action.”
Connect with Christian News
Follow @4christiannews
“The Secretary of State and the State of Alabama have no valid reason or interest in requiring all voters to take an oath that requires them to swear ‘so help me God,'” the lawsuit states.
“County registrars and the State of Alabama have adequate means of ensuring the truthfulness of voter information without requiring voters to violate their conscience by swearing ‘so help me God,'” it claims. “Indeed, the information provided by voters is objectively either correct or incorrect, regardless of any oath.”
The legal challenge seeks for the court to declare the inclusion a violation of the Establishment, Free Exercise, Free Speech, and Equal Protection Clauses and to order the state to make forms available that don’t include the phrase.
As previously reported, earlier this year, a French-born woman who lives in Massachusetts has lost her appeal effort to have the phrase “so help me God” removed from the United States naturalization oath, as the First Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that its inclusion is not unconstitutional.
While the case differs in that the court noted that the woman could simply not say the phrase, it noted that “there is an established history of invocations of God in public oaths and statements tracing back to the founding era.”
The panel pointed to the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in American Legion v. American Humanist Association, which found that removing public faith-based displays could “strike many as aggressively hostile to religion” and would therefore not be neutral as the Constitution requires.
The preamble to the 1861 Alabama Constitution mentions God, opening with, “We the people of the State of Alabama, having separated ourselves from the government known as the United States of America, and being now by our representatives in Convention assembled, and acting in our sovereign and independent character, in order to establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity — invoking the favor and guidance of Almighty God — do ordain and establish the following Constitution and form of government for the State of Alabama.”


thelibertydaily--2020-10-04--Leftist “Comedian” Chris Rock on SNL: ‘Trump Is in the Hospital with COVID — My Heart Goes Out to CO

Leftist “Comedian” Chris Rock on SNL: ‘Trump Is in the Hospital with COVID — My Heart Goes Out to COVID’

During the season premiere of NBC ’ s “ Saturday Night Live , ” guest host Chris Rock opened the show with a monologue that took a jab at President Donald Trump over his COVID-19 diagnosis .
Rock called it the “ elephant in the room , ” then said his heart went out to COVID , referring to the President ’ s medical condition .
“ Before we even get started , let ’ s — you know , hey , the elephant in the room : President Trump ’ s in the hospital from COVID , and I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out to COVID , ” Rock said .
“ This is a special show this show is quite different than every other show .
There are so many protocols — everybody in this audience has been checked , and all week I ’ ve had things going up my nose .
Every day I come in here — I haven ’ t had so much stuff up my nose since I shared a dressing room with Chris Farley .
“ Now , you know , the world is insane right now , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we can agree upon , COVID , has ruined our plans .
We all used to have plans before COVID .
Remember we all used to have plans ?
My sister was getting married , man .
I paid Bel Biv Devoe $ 80,000 , man .
And I can ’ t get it back .
I had tickets to Coachella , man .
I know 200,000 Americans are dead , but I ’ m not seeing Rage Against the Machine this year , man .
That is a travesty .
”

During the season premiere of NBC’s “Saturday Night Live,” guest host Chris Rock opened the show with a monologue that took a jab at President Donald Trump over his COVID-19 diagnosis.
Rock called it the “elephant in the room,” then said his heart went out to COVID, referring to the President’s medical condition.
“Before we even get started, let’s — you know, hey, the elephant in the room: President Trump’s in the hospital from COVID, and I just want to say my heart goes out to COVID,” Rock said. “This is a special show this show is quite different than every other show. There are so many protocols — everybody in this audience has been checked, and all week I’ve had things going up my nose. Every day I come in here — I haven’t had so much stuff up my nose since I shared a dressing room with Chris Farley.
“Now, you know, the world is insane right now,” Rock added. “But one thing we can agree upon, COVID, has ruined our plans. We all used to have plans before COVID. Remember we all used to have plans? My sister was getting married, man. I paid Bel Biv Devoe $80,000, man. And I can’t get it back. I had tickets to Coachella, man. I know 200,000 Americans are dead, but I’m not seeing Rage Against the Machine this year, man. That is a travesty.”
Follow Jeff Poor on Twitter @jeff_poor


thelibertydaily--2020-10-04--Trish Regan: If Biden Elected Get Ready For 1970s Bell-Bottoms and Stagflation

In the disco-loving days of the 1970s , John Travolta was dazzling Americans in white bell-bottoms while dancing to the Bee-Gees in the hit movie Saturday Night Fever .
Joe Biden was campaigning alongside longtime segregationist Senator Jesse Helms to end the busing of black children into white school districts .
( Kamala Harris , his now VP candidate , reminded America of that in the early Democratic debates . )
And , the Federal Reserve was desperately trying to fight a new kind of economic turmoil , the likes of which they never thought possible .
Stagflation .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ poison pill : High inflation and low growth .
Stagflation is what you could call one of the worst and most challenging economic scenarios ; one that causes Central Bankers to wake up in cold sweats in the middle of the night—and one , that could quite possibly rear its unpredictable , ugly head again .
If Joe Biden and Kamala Harris wind up in the White House , if the Democrats gain control of the Senate and maintain the House , then we will have real economic problems not unlike those that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the 30s ( though I ’ ll save that decade for another column on another day . )
Already , there are indications of stagflation ’ s creep…growth is low , yet commodity prices are high .
Sound familiar ?
As commodity prices soar and economic growth slows , it ’ s not inconceivable our economy could experience the nightmare scenario of high inflation and low growth of Nixon and Carter administrations .
In the 70s , it was the supply shock coming from the Middle East that caused oil prices to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rationale for that would be ; oil prices are rising because there ’ s plenty of demand .
EXCEPT that the oil cartels were exactly that…cartels .
As such , they didn ’ t play by normal supply-demand , market rules .
AND , as such , they continued driving oil prices higher , as we all paid the price .
Shortages , long lines , and high prices .
It was so bad that as a kid in 1979 , I remember my parents making a big deal out of switching to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ avoiding those long gas lines .
It sort of worked .
( That was , so long as we could find a gas station that carried Diesel ! )
It wasn ’ t until the supply-siders of the Reagan era , including my good friend Art Laffer were able to influence economic policy to help get the government out of the way that we saw the reversal of the stagflation in America .
The Fed , too , had to get tough and interest rates skyrocketed .
But , this isn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t win , we will no longer have Laeffer ’ s quasi-successor , my friend and former co-host Larry Kudlow in place as the head of the National Economic Council .
Like Laffer , Kudlow is an alum of the Reagan administration and , also like Laffer , Larry a big proponent of supply-side economics .
And , now…are you ready for some extra bad news ?
Commodity prices , like the 1970s , are currently spiking .
Silver futures jumped 26 % in the third quarter .
Meanwhile , copper is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ having recovered roughly 40 % in the past six months following an early-year sell-off tied to the decline in Chinese economic growth after China ’ s economy shut down during coronavirus .
And while we don ’ t have the middle east as an economic threat – we do have China .
China , which doesn ’ t play by the same rules as the rest of the world .
Like the cartels of the 1970s , China packs some serious economic punch in terms of its ability to buy up the commodities @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the higher the commodity prices go .
China accounts for roughly half of global copper demand , making its manufacturing sector a primary driver of prices .
Copper is a key component of everything from electric vehicles to smartphones .
All while we here at home in the U.S. are still coping with an on-again-off-again economy .
If commodities keep moving higher , and the Democrats take over , stagflation could hit just as attempt a climb back towards a great U.S. economy .
Given the left ’ s bias towards socialism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inflation , it ’ s clear we are at risk for heading back to bell-bottoms and stagflation .

Trish Regan is asking why the government is so keen to save some banks but not others? In the latest edition of her podcast,...