thelibertydaily--2020-11-01--EMPLOYEES OF BIG TECH ARE HEREBY DESIGNATED ENEMIES OF AMERICA

DHS Acting Secretary Chad Wolf has now called out Twitter for its censorship , claiming the social media platform “ endangers national security ” with its outrageous , never-ending censorship spree .
In a scathing letter , Wolf demanded Twitter , “ commit to never again censoring content ” on its platform , following Twitter ’ s malicious censorship of Customs and Border Protection ( CBP ) Commissioner Mark Morgan .
Now that Twitter is censoring government , it seems that Big Government is beginning to finally notice how dangerous Big Tech has become .
As I have relentlessly warned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tech already believes it need not answer to any government , and its CEOs like Dorsey believe they are above the law while suffering from the delusion that they alone possess a sort of twisted “ divine right ” to determine what people are allowed to speak , share , say or hear .
Over the last four years , I have repeatedly called for Jack Dorsey to be arrested and tried for treason , election interference , racketeering and fraud .
Now , suddenly , the head of the Dept .
of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , explaining how Twitter ’ s censorship is a national security threat .
But isn ’ t it interesting that until Big Tech ’ s censorship authoritarianism reached the level of censoring government itself , nobody in government seemed to mind Twitter ’ s censorship of private sector businesses and citizens ?
Now , it ’ s suddenly a “ national security ” issue .
In his letter , Wolf wrote : As the Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies continue to rely on Twitter to share important information with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ threat to our security .
Twitter had censored the head of CBP for posting an update about the progress of building the border wall .
In response , Twitter ’ s radical left-wing moderators / censors wrote : You may not promote violence against , threaten , or harass other people on the basis of race , ethnicity , national origin , sexual orientation , gender , gender identity , religious affiliation , age , disability , or serious disease .
This is the same deception that Twitter and other tech giants use @ @ @ @ @ @ @ transgenderism indoctrination , warn the public about the dangers of toxic vaccines , or defend the rights of Christians , conservatives or police officers .
To the deranged , lunatic Left , any defense of police , White people , Christianity or America is “ hate speech.
” In Wolf ’ s letter to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey , he explained , “ The acting commissioner ’ s tweet did none of these things… CBP guards the front line of the American homeland .
CBP repels and arrests thousands of violent criminal gang @ @ @ @ @ @ @ girls who are forced into cross-border sex trafficking .
CBP intercepts dangerous drugs and contraband , including enough of the opioid fentanyl to kill every man , woman , and child in the United States several times over.
” But Twitter doesn ’ t care .
Any talk of building a border wall is “ hate speech ” and must be silenced .
As The Epoch Times writes : Wolf ’ s letter to Dorsey came the same day Twitter decided to unfreeze the account of the New York Post .
The outlet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Twitter account since Oct. 14 after it shared a stories about alleged overseas business dealings of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden ’ s son Hunter Biden .
Twitter stipulated that the outlet had to delete the original Biden Twitter posts before being able to tweet again , before changing its stance on Friday .
All employees of Big Tech are hereby designated enemies of America What this episode reveals in great details is the inescapable truth that ’ s now apparent to everyone : It ’ s not just the CEOs of these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fraudsters and hate-filled intolerant bigots , it ’ s their employees , too !
Because of their dedication to authoritarianism and the destruction of free speech , every employee of Google , YouTube , Twitter , Facebook and the fake news media cartels ( CNN , MSNBC , NY Times , WashPost , etc . )
is an enemy of America .
They despise this nation and actively work to destroy America ’ s border security , Constitution , Bill of Rights and rule of law .
It ’ s not just the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Zuckerberg , in other words ; it ’ s their digital jackbooted thugs who sit in their cubicles and silence all the speech they don ’ t want Americans to be able to read or share .
That speech includes information about America ’ s national security , obviously , as well as anything posted in support of law enforcement such as “ thin blue line ” flags , which Twitter and Facebook consider to be hate speech against BLM .
With Big Tech ’ s censorship , human civilization is now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as dangerous and destructive as any war in human history , including World War II and the battle against Hitler ’ s Third Reich .
We do not espouse violence against anyone working for these companies , but rather call on federal law enforcement to arrest , charge and prosecute the CEOs , managers and employees of these companies for treason , racketeering and a conspiracy to defraud the United States of America .
( See below . )
Malicious censorship is no accident ; it is deliberate and targeted to silence Americans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Twitter and the other tech giants keep claiming their censorship is an “ accident , ” but that ’ s just a dishonest cover story .
It ’ s clear their censorship is deliberate and that the very philosophy of authoritarianism and censorship is now systemic in the company cultures of the tech giants .
You could call it , “ systemic intolerance ” or just plain “ digital bigotry , ” but the employees and contractors who work for these tech companies are , themselves , the very kind of racist , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being .
Once again , it ’ s all projection .
Thus , when Trump wins the election and it comes time to clean house and arrest the CEOs of the tech companies and charge them with treason , racketeering and fraud , we must remember that the employees and managers of these tech companies are complicit in crimes against the American people .
They must not be let off the hook without facing arrest and prosecution for their complicity .
Remember : As we learned from the East German soldiers manning the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I was just following orders ” is no excuse .
The damage inflicted upon human freedom by Big Tech ’ s censorship is incalculable Big Tech ’ s employees conspired to destroy the lives of millions of Americans who have been irreparably harmed — financially and emotionally — by the extreme and deliberate censorship policies of companies like Twitter .
These employees are just as guilty as Dorsey himself , and they must face prosecution for their conspiracy of crimes against America .
Remember this as the civil war erupts due to insane @ @ @ @ @ @ @ carry out an extremist coup against this nation : Many of the Left ’ s footsoldiers who are throwing Molotov cocktails and committing arson on the streets are also employees of Big Tech .
During the day , they destroy this nation on the digital battlefield ; at night they burn America ’ s cities and small businesses to the ground , further shoring up the power of the corporate monopolists .
These people are , in essence , enemy combatants on a battlefield they declared .
They are enemies of America and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ application of force under law .
These enemies of America have already proven they are willing to abuse and exploit their power to destroy you , and their larger goal is the complete destruction of our republic .
If they are not stopped by force under law , they will continue their path of total destruction until nothing remains .
Stop them now or lose America forever .
And once Dorsey , Zuckerberg , Pichai and others are convicted in a court of law , America must choose a punishment for them that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suffering they have inflicted upon millions of others .
A death sentence would be far too kind .
These tech CEOs must be made to endure their lawfully-decided punishments , for decades to come .
In doing so , we will be sending a message to all future would-be tyrants that America takes its freedoms seriously , and that those who conspire to destroy this nation ’ s First Amendment or Second Amendment will be dealt with in exactly the way they deserve .
Once the Big Tech criminals are brought to justice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the assets of the tech giants , shut down their operations , and redistribute all assets to those who were harmed by Big Tech ’ s malicious censorship .
We need a nationwide class action settlement to right the wrongs of traitors like Dorsey , Zuckerberg and Pichai .
Even that will only scratch the surface in repairing the damage they ’ ve done to hundreds of millions of individuals and small businesses across this planet .
The evils of censorship are technically incalculable , just as the evils of the Third Reich @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trials .
But at least it ’ s a start .
And if we are to coexist as a civil society ever again , those on the Left who conspired and colluded to suppress the human dignity of their political opponents must confess to their crimes and face a just punishment for their malicious betrayal of humanity .
• All employees of Big Tech are hereby designated enemies of America COVID-19 may take down an independent news outlet Nobody said running a media site would be easy .
We could use some help @ @ @ @ @ @ @ called me the worst fundraiser ever .
My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet .
Paying the bills has never been my forte , but we ’ ve survived .
We have ads on the site that help , but since the site ’ s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn ’ t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it .
When I left a nice , corporate career in 2017 , I did so knowing I wouldn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth .
We know we ’ ll never make a ton of money this way , and we ’ re okay with that .
Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns .
Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically .
We thought we could weather the storm @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or “ 2nd-wave ” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy .
In short , we are now in desperate need of financial assistance .
The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate .
Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly .
Alternatively , you can donate through PayPal as well .
We need approximately $ 11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020 , but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ second way to help is to become a partner .
We ’ ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills , it didn ’ t seem necessary .
Now , we ’ re struggling to pay the bills .
This shouldn ’ t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically .
June , 2018 , we had 11,678 visitors .
A year later in June , 2019 , we were up to 116,194 .
In June , 2020 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ re heading in the right direction and we believe we ’ re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “ get in on the action ” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth .
Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above .
Election year or not , coronavirus lockdowns or not , anarchic riots or not , the need for truthful journalism endures .
But in these times , we need as many conservative media voices as possible .
Please help keep @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
The coronavirus crisis has prompted many , even some conservatives , to promote authoritarianism .
It ’ s understandable to some extent now , but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life .
We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv.
DHS Acting Secretary Chad Wolf has now called out Twitter for its censorship, claiming the social media platform “endangers national security” with its outrageous, never-ending censorship spree.
In a scathing letter, Wolf demanded Twitter, “commit to never again censoring content” on its platform, following Twitter’s malicious censorship of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Commissioner Mark Morgan.
Now that Twitter is censoring government, it seems that Big Government is beginning to finally notice how dangerous Big Tech has become. As I have relentlessly warned for the last four years, Big Tech already believes it need not answer to any government, and its CEOs like Dorsey believe they are above the law while suffering from the delusion that they alone possess a sort of twisted “divine right” to determine what people are allowed to speak, share, say or hear.
Over the last four years, I have repeatedly called for Jack Dorsey to be arrested and tried for treason, election interference, racketeering and fraud. Now, suddenly, the head of the Dept. of Homeland Security is echoing my own warnings, explaining how Twitter’s censorship is a national security threat. But isn’t it interesting that until Big Tech’s censorship authoritarianism reached the level of censoring government itself, nobody in government seemed to mind Twitter’s censorship of private sector businesses and citizens?
Now, it’s suddenly a “national security” issue. In his letter, Wolf wrote:
As the Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies continue to rely on Twitter to share important information with the U.S. public, your censorship poses a threat to our security.
Twitter had censored the head of CBP for posting an update about the progress of building the border wall. In response, Twitter’s radical left-wing moderators / censors wrote:
You may not promote violence against, threaten, or harass other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or serious disease.
This is the same deception that Twitter and other tech giants use against anyone working to protect children from transgenderism indoctrination, warn the public about the dangers of toxic vaccines, or defend the rights of Christians, conservatives or police officers. To the deranged, lunatic Left, any defense of police, White people, Christianity or America is “hate speech.”
In Wolf’s letter to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, he explained, “The acting commissioner’s tweet did none of these things… CBP guards the front line of the American homeland. CBP repels and arrests thousands of violent criminal gang members each year. CBP rescues young girls who are forced into cross-border sex trafficking. CBP intercepts dangerous drugs and contraband, including enough of the opioid fentanyl to kill every man, woman, and child in the United States several times over.”
We’re LIVE and everything is on sale for a limited time! Whole Cows has launched offering freeze-dried beef for long-term storage. Don’t wait for food shortages to get worse. Stock up today. Use promo code “launch15” at checkout for 15% off!
But Twitter doesn’t care. Any talk of building a border wall is “hate speech” and must be silenced. As The Epoch Times writes:
Wolf’s letter to Dorsey came the same day Twitter decided to unfreeze the account of the New York Post. The outlet was unable to post content on its Twitter account since Oct. 14 after it shared a stories about alleged overseas business dealings of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden. Twitter stipulated that the outlet had to delete the original Biden Twitter posts before being able to tweet again, before changing its stance on Friday.
All employees of Big Tech are hereby designated enemies of America
What this episode reveals in great details is the inescapable truth that’s now apparent to everyone: It’s not just the CEOs of these tech giants that are evil, criminal fraudsters and hate-filled intolerant bigots, it’s their employees, too!
Because of their dedication to authoritarianism and the destruction of free speech, every employee of Google, YouTube, Twitter, Facebook and the fake news media cartels (CNN, MSNBC, NY Times, WashPost, etc.) is an enemy of America. They despise this nation and actively work to destroy America’s border security, Constitution, Bill of Rights and rule of law.
It’s not just the criminal leaders of these organizations like Dorsey and Zuckerberg, in other words; it’s their digital jackbooted thugs who sit in their cubicles and silence all the speech they don’t want Americans to be able to read or share.
That speech includes information about America’s national security, obviously, as well as anything posted in support of law enforcement such as “thin blue line” flags, which Twitter and Facebook consider to be hate speech against BLM.
With Big Tech’s censorship, human civilization is now facing a war that’s just as dangerous and destructive as any war in human history, including World War II and the battle against Hitler’s Third Reich.
The tech companies designated enemies of America include:
“Nations, states, and central banks are quietly but rapidly shifting their money to precious metals. With bank runs, recession, CBDCs, and worse on the horizon, it’s easy to see why. NOW is the time to learn more about moving portions of your retirement or wealth to a self-directed gold and silver IRA through an America-First, Christian precious metals company.” – JD Rucker (not a financial advisor, just a guy who’s paying attention)
Google
Apple
Twitter
Facebook
YouTube
Pinterest
Wikipedia
Instagram
We do not espouse violence against anyone working for these companies, but rather call on federal law enforcement to arrest, charge and prosecute the CEOs, managers and employees of these companies for treason, racketeering and a conspiracy to defraud the United States of America. (See below.)
Malicious censorship is no accident; it is deliberate and targeted to silence Americans while promoting the interests of communist China
Twitter and the other tech giants keep claiming their censorship is an “accident,” but that’s just a dishonest cover story. It’s clear their censorship is deliberate and that the very philosophy of authoritarianism and censorship is now systemic in the company cultures of the tech giants. You could call it, “systemic intolerance” or just plain “digital bigotry,” but the employees and contractors who work for these tech companies are, themselves, the very kind of racist, intolerant bullies they accuse Trump supporters of being. Once again, it’s all projection.
Thus, when Trump wins the election and it comes time to clean house and arrest the CEOs of the tech companies and charge them with treason, racketeering and fraud, we must remember that the employees and managers of these tech companies are complicit in crimes against the American people.
They must not be let off the hook without facing arrest and prosecution for their complicity.
Remember: As we learned from the East German soldiers manning the Berlin Wall, someone claiming, “I was just following orders” is no excuse.
The damage inflicted upon human freedom by Big Tech’s censorship is incalculable
Big Tech’s employees conspired to destroy the lives of millions of Americans who have been irreparably harmed — financially and emotionally — by the extreme and deliberate censorship policies of companies like Twitter. These employees are just as guilty as Dorsey himself, and they must face prosecution for their conspiracy of crimes against America.
Remember this as the civil war erupts due to insane, violent Leftists who are trying to carry out an extremist coup against this nation: Many of the Left’s footsoldiers who are throwing Molotov cocktails and committing arson on the streets are also employees of Big Tech. During the day, they destroy this nation on the digital battlefield; at night they burn America’s cities and small businesses to the ground, further shoring up the power of the corporate monopolists.
These people are, in essence, enemy combatants on a battlefield they declared. They are enemies of America and they must be brought down through the application of force under law. These enemies of America have already proven they are willing to abuse and exploit their power to destroy you, and their larger goal is the complete destruction of our republic. If they are not stopped by force under law, they will continue their path of total destruction until nothing remains.
Stop them now or lose America forever. And once Dorsey, Zuckerberg, Pichai and others are convicted in a court of law, America must choose a punishment for them that is consistent with the degree of human suffering they have inflicted upon millions of others. A death sentence would be far too kind. These tech CEOs must be made to endure their lawfully-decided punishments, for decades to come.
In doing so, we will be sending a message to all future would-be tyrants that America takes its freedoms seriously, and that those who conspire to destroy this nation’s First Amendment or Second Amendment will be dealt with in exactly the way they deserve.
Once the Big Tech criminals are brought to justice, the U.S. government must seize all the assets of the tech giants, shut down their operations, and redistribute all assets to those who were harmed by Big Tech’s malicious censorship. We need a nationwide class action settlement to right the wrongs of traitors like Dorsey, Zuckerberg and Pichai. Even that will only scratch the surface in repairing the damage they’ve done to hundreds of millions of individuals and small businesses across this planet. The evils of censorship are technically incalculable, just as the evils of the Third Reich could never be righted via the Nuremburg Trials.
But at least it’s a start. And if we are to coexist as a civil society ever again, those on the Left who conspired and colluded to suppress the human dignity of their political opponents must confess to their crimes and face a just punishment for their malicious betrayal of humanity.
COVID-19 may take down an independent news outlet
Nobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.
Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it.
When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that.
Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance.
The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated.
Massive Sale on beef. Freeze dried Ribeye, NY Strip, and Premium beef cubes. Promo code “jdr” at checkout for 15% off! WholeCows.com
The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above.
Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


thelibertydaily--2020-11-01--Kamala Harris Gave Plea Deal to Illegal Alien Months Before He Killed Drew Rosenberg

In the first week of November 2010 , then-San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris won her statewide race to become California ’ s Attorney General .
Two weeks later , Angel Dad Don Rosenberg lost his son Drew , 25-years-old , at the hands of an illegal alien .
On November 16 , 2010 , second-year law student Drew Rosenberg was killed in San Francisco by Roberto Galo , an illegal alien from Honduras who had been granted Temporary Protected Status ( TPS ) to stay in the United States .
Galo hit Drew , who was riding his bike @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attempting to flee the scene of the crash .
Galo stopped his car on Drew ’ s abdomen , prompting a group of bystanders to help lift the car off of him .
A year before Drew ’ s death , then-San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom ( D ) implemented a policy that allowed unlicensed drivers about 20 minutes to find a licensed driver to drive their car so that it would not be impounded by the city .
The policy ensured illegal aliens , driving without licenses , could be pulled over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to deal with having their car impounded .
As District Attorney , Harris seemed to follow the Newsom policy , Rosenberg said .
“ It was a decision by the city of San Francisco that if you ’ re here illegally , you don ’ t have to follow the law , ” Rosenberg told Breitbart News .
“ And as district attorney , it was Kamala ’ s job to say , ‘ You can ’ t do that — you can ’ t tell people that they can drive without a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was killed , in June 2010 , Galo was pulled over by San Francisco police officers for driving the wrong way down a one-way street .
Galo was arrested and charged with driving without a license and driving without insurance .
Harris ’ s office offered Galo a plea deal that would allow him to escape the more serious charges of driving without a license and driving without insurance by pleading guilty to driving the wrong way .
Rosenberg said Galo had taken a driver ’ s test on three occasions and failed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , detailing his son ’ s case in great length , Rosenberg wrote : The inspector told us it was a slam dunk felony vehicular homicide .
There were no skid marks from Galo ’ s car as he never attempted to stop .
He also told us that Galo had been caught driving without a license , driving the wrong way on a one way street and driving without insurance in June 2010 .
The case would now be in the hands of the San Francisco District Attorney ’ s Office .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , 2010 Galo appeared in traffic court for his June 14 charges .
The DA ’ s office had cut him a deal : Plead guilty to driving the wrong way on a one way street and the charges for driving without a license and driving without insurance would be dropped .
At this point Galo had already been driving again for 45 days .
Of course he took the deal .
The DA ’ s office refuses to tell us if he ever paid the ticket for the wrong way violation .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ a year of asking the district attorney ’ s office — that Galo paid the $ 220 ticket .
Through his own findings in the case , Rosenberg learned that Galo was able to almost immediately begin driving in San Francisco again after his car was impounded for the June 2010 arrest and charges .
The very next day , Galo apparently signed the car title over to Digna Guzman , who quickly got herself and Galo insured on the car .
That same day , Guzman was able to get the car @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Rosenberg said .
In a letter to Harris dated February 21 , 2011 , who was now attorney general , Rosenberg pressed her office about why Galo had been offered such a plea deal and was allowed to get his car from impound so quickly against state law .
I am not writing you as the Attorney General .
I am writing to you because you were the District Attorney of San Francisco when Roberto Galo was first arrested in June .
You were the District Attorney when this tragedy occurred .
You @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hearing fiasco occurred .
The staff of the District Attorney ’ s office was under your control and responsibility .
And what I have recently learned is that when Roberto Galo was caught driving without a license , without insurance and driving the wrong way down a one way street , your DA ’ s Office offered and Galo accepted a plea on the lesser charge of driving the wrong way down a one way street .
Your DA ’ s Office dropped the charge of driving without a license and without insurance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s Office do that ?
Could there have been an easier conviction ?
My son is dead because the DA ’ s did not ( and continues to believe ) that driving without a license is a big deal .
[ Emphasis added ] Although no one will confirm , it certainly appears that the policy of the San Francisco District Attorney ’ s office is not to prosecute unlicensed drivers unless they are in a fatal collision .
Since you were the District Attorney , I have to believe that this was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
[ Emphasis added ] Galo was convicted of voluntary manslaughter .
He spent 43 days in jail for killing Drew .
The Rosenberg case is not the first time Harris has been involved in such a matter .
As Breitbart News reported , Harris failed to prosecute illegal alien MS-13 Gang member Edwin Ramos in a traffic violation months before he went on to murder 48-year-old Tony Bologna and two of his sons — 20-year-old Michael and 16-year-old Matthew .
Angel Mom Danielle Bologna publicly pleaded with Harris to seek the death @ @ @ @ @ @ @ instead sought a life sentence .
Similarly , Harris implemented a jobs program as San Francisco District Attorney .
Harris ’ s “ Back on Track ” program allowed 18 to 30-year-olds to plead guilty to drug felonies so long as they agreed to spend a year in the program , living where they chose .
The program was open to illegal aliens like then-20-year-old Alexander Izaguirre , who had pled guilty to selling cocaine .
Months after Izaguirre was put in Harris ’ s Back on Track program , he robbed then-29-year-old @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to run her over .
Kiefer suffered ear bleeding and a fractured skull as a result of the attack .
Not until a year after Kiefer ’ s assault did Harris acknowledge that her Back on Track program for convicts had provided jobs to illegal aliens .
Once she learned of their inclusion , Harris allowed illegal aliens to finish their time in the program .
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News .
Follow him on Twitter at @ JxhnBinder .

In the first week of November 2010, then-San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris won her statewide race to become California’s Attorney General. Two weeks later, Angel Dad Don Rosenberg lost his son Drew, 25-years-old, at the hands of an illegal alien.
On November 16, 2010, second-year law student Drew Rosenberg was killed in San Francisco by Roberto Galo, an illegal alien from Honduras who had been granted Temporary Protected Status (TPS) to stay in the United States.
Galo hit Drew, who was riding his bike, and ran him over twice before attempting to flee the scene of the crash. Galo stopped his car on Drew’s abdomen, prompting a group of bystanders to help lift the car off of him.
A year before Drew’s death, then-San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom (D) implemented a policy that allowed unlicensed drivers about 20 minutes to find a licensed driver to drive their car so that it would not be impounded by the city.
The policy ensured illegal aliens, driving without licenses, could be pulled over, cited, and fined without having to deal with having their car impounded. As District Attorney, Harris seemed to follow the Newsom policy, Rosenberg said.
“It was a decision by the city of San Francisco that if you’re here illegally, you don’t have to follow the law,” Rosenberg told Breitbart News. “And as district attorney, it was Kamala’s job to say, ‘You can’t do that — you can’t tell people that they can drive without a license.'”
Months before Drew was killed, in June 2010, Galo was pulled over by San Francisco police officers for driving the wrong way down a one-way street. Galo was arrested and charged with driving without a license and driving without insurance.
Harris’s office offered Galo a plea deal that would allow him to escape the more serious charges of driving without a license and driving without insurance by pleading guilty to driving the wrong way. Rosenberg said Galo had taken a driver’s test on three occasions and failed each time.
In a 2013 post, detailing his son’s case in great length, Rosenberg wrote:
The inspector told us it was a slam dunk felony vehicular homicide. There were no skid marks from Galo’s car as he never attempted to stop. He also told us that Galo had been caught driving without a license, driving the wrong way on a one way street and driving without insurance in June 2010. The case would now be in the hands of the San Francisco District Attorney’s Office. [Emphasis added] … On July 27, 2010 Galo appeared in traffic court for his June 14 charges. The DA’s office had cut him a deal: Plead guilty to driving the wrong way on a one way street and the charges for driving without a license and driving without insurance would be dropped. At this point Galo had already been driving again for 45 days. Of course he took the deal. The DA’s office refuses to tell us if he ever paid the ticket for the wrong way violation.
Rosenberg said he eventually discovered — after a year of asking the district attorney’s office — that Galo paid the $220 ticket.
Through his own findings in the case, Rosenberg learned that Galo was able to almost immediately begin driving in San Francisco again after his car was impounded for the June 2010 arrest and charges.
The very next day, Galo apparently signed the car title over to Digna Guzman, who quickly got herself and Galo insured on the car. That same day, Guzman was able to get the car from impound and Galo began driving, Rosenberg said.
In a letter to Harris dated February 21, 2011, who was now attorney general, Rosenberg pressed her office about why Galo had been offered such a plea deal and was allowed to get his car from impound so quickly against state law.
Rosenberg wrote to Harris:
I am not writing you as the Attorney General. I am writing to you because you were the District Attorney of San Francisco when Roberto Galo was first arrested in June. You were the District Attorney when this tragedy occurred. You were the District Attorney when the preliminary hearing fiasco occurred. The staff of the District Attorney’s office was under your control and responsibility. And what I have recently learned is that when Roberto Galo was caught driving without a license, without insurance and driving the wrong way down a one way street, your DA’s Office offered and Galo accepted a plea on the lesser charge of driving the wrong way down a one way street . Your DA’s Office dropped the charge of driving without a license and without insurance charges. Why would your DA’s Office do that? Could there have been an easier conviction? My son is dead because the DA’s did not (and continues to believe) that driving without a license is a big deal. [Emphasis added] … Although no one will confirm, it certainly appears that the policy of the San Francisco District Attorney’s office is not to prosecute unlicensed drivers unless they are in a fatal collision. Since you were the District Attorney, I have to believe that this was your policy and your department implemented it. [Emphasis added]
Galo was convicted of voluntary manslaughter. He spent 43 days in jail for killing Drew.
The Rosenberg case is not the first time Harris has been involved in such a matter. As Breitbart News reported, Harris failed to prosecute illegal alien MS-13 Gang member Edwin Ramos in a traffic violation months before he went on to murder 48-year-old Tony Bologna and two of his sons — 20-year-old Michael and 16-year-old Matthew.
Angel Mom Danielle Bologna publicly pleaded with Harris to seek the death penalty against Ramos. Harris refused and instead sought a life sentence.
Similarly, Harris implemented a jobs program as San Francisco District Attorney. Harris’s “Back on Track” program allowed 18 to 30-year-olds to plead guilty to drug felonies so long as they agreed to spend a year in the program, living where they chose.
The program was open to illegal aliens like then-20-year-old Alexander Izaguirre,who had pled guilty to selling cocaine. Months after Izaguirre was put in Harris’s Back on Track program, he robbed then-29-year-old Amanda Kiefer before jumping into an SUV to run her over.
Kiefer suffered ear bleeding and a fractured skull as a result of the attack.
Not until a year after Kiefer’s assault did Harris acknowledge that her Back on Track program for convicts had provided jobs to illegal aliens. Once she learned of their inclusion, Harris allowed illegal aliens to finish their time in the program.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.


thelibertydaily--2020-11-01--Deep State Kingpin Robert Mueller Gathered Evidence DNC, Crooked Hillary Camp MANUFACTURED Trump-Rus

Deep State Kingpin Robert Mueller Gathered Evidence DNC, Crooked Hillary Camp MANUFACTURED Trump-Russia Collusion Story

Special Counsel Robert Mueller 's office gathered evidence suggesting that Hillary Clinton 's campaign and the Democratic National Committee launched a political `` smear job '' in spring 2016 tying Donald Trump to Russia collusion through the lobbying work of his campaign chairman Paul Manafort in Ukraine , according to memos that were excluded from the prosecutor 's final report .
The evidence , reviewed by Just the News , includes information obtained by State Department officials from a trusted Ukrainian source , a private investigator 's report , and an email exchange suggesting Tony Podesta — a Manafort business @ @ @ @ @ @ @ John Podesta — tried at one point to slow down the opposition research project .
The evidence — which is additional to records showing the law firm for the Clinton campaign and the DNC funded the infamous `` Steele dossier '' given to the FBI — was never mentioned in last year 's vast , two-volume Mueller Report , which concluded that no Americans colluded with Russia to influence the 2016 election .
The newly surfaced evidence bolsters separate intelligence reporting that Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe made public recently showing the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had launched a political dirty trick to `` vilify '' Trump on Russia in an effort to distract from her own controversies .
`` We did have evidence to show that early collusion allegations against Trump and Manafort were created or propagated by people who either worked for the DNC or the Clinton campaign , including some efforts that went beyond the Steele dossier , '' a person with direct knowledge of the Mueller probe told Just the News .
The person spoke only on condition of anonymity because the person did not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media .
Asked why the Mueller report did not mention the Clinton campaign tactics , the source answered : `` Our job was to report on and prosecute crimes , not write an essay on how political opposition research was conducted by the two parties . ''
Unredacted emails and other documents gathered by Mueller 's team suggest the earliest hint of the Democrats ' Russia collusion smear campaign emerged in a May 2016 email exchange between Democratic super-lobbyist Tony Podesta and Manafort 's lead business manager in Ukraine , Rick Gates , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ manager for the Trump campaign .
The thread appeared under the subject line : `` DNC and Paul Manafort . ''
Though on opposite sides of the political spectrum , Tony Podesta , Manafort and Gates worked together on lobbying and political consulting projects related to Ukraine 's Party of Regions and former President Viktor Yanukovych , who was ousted from power in 2014 .
`` Last Friday APAC had a meeting at DNC organized by their ethnic outreach office , presenting Democratic Party strategies for presidential elections , '' Gates emailed Tony @ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` One of the subjects was a smear campaign against Paul Manafort , which will be launched in a couple of days .
The head of the ethnic outreach is of Ukrainian descent and has connections in Ukraine .
`` She was able to produce documents linking Manafort to Moscow during his time as adviser to Victor Yanukowych ( cq ) , ousted former Ukrainian president .
They will try to link Donald Trump to Putin through Manafort 's engagement and money trail of over [ a ] billion dollars .
This was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ DNC — I am trying to obtain an audio tape from the meeting .
I just wanted to share this with you to make you aware before they start . ''
Tony Podesta responded by asking what APAC was and Gates wrote back : `` You will love this one ... the American Polish Advisory Council . ''
A few days later , Podesta reported back to Gates in a May 23 , 2016 email : `` Think I slowed this down . ''
Other documents show how Gates and Manafort got a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ APAC event with Chalupa from an official with the Polish lobby .
In an interview , Gates confirmed to Just the News that the email exchanges occurred and said that Podesta eventually disclosed to the Manafort team that the DNC 's lead figure on the opposition research campaign targeting Trump was a Ukrainian-American woman and DNC contractor named Alexandra Chalupa .
Gates , who later pled guilty to financial crimes and became a cooperating witness in the Mueller probe , added that he was questioned by the prosecutor 's team about Chalupa 's @ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` In interview sessions with the Special Counsel 's office I was asked about two issues related to Tony Podesta , '' Gates said .
`` The first was a series of emails between Tony and me about questions posed by the Associated Press in relation to the lobbying work that Paul 's firm and Tony 's firm did in Ukraine .
`` The second issue was an email exchange I had with Tony Podesta in spring 2016 requesting Tony 's help and support about a political opposition project that was being orchestrated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ falsely tie him to Russia as a means of suggesting Trump was tied to Russia , '' he added .
`` I told the Special Counsel I reached out to Tony at Paul 's request to see if he could help .
`` Tony came back to me and identified the DNC operative who was running the operation as Alexandra Chalupa , the head of their ethnic coalitions .
Tony also indicated he believed he had been successful in slowing down the opposition research against Paul . ''
In answers to emailed questions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the May 2016 email exchange `` looks authentic , '' but he vehemently disputed Gates ' claim that he intervened with the DNC to slow down any anti-Trump research or even knew Chalupa 's name .
`` Never did anything , '' Podesta wrote .
`` Did n't tell him Chalupa was at DNC .
Did n't know about Chalupa . ''
`` Do n't remember what it refers to but clearly not Chalupa and Manafort , '' he added .
Chalupa , John Podesta , the DNC and Hillary Clinton 's @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comment .
Chalupa 's name first emerged in January 2017 , when a Politico article reported she had contacts with the Ukrainian embassy in Washington and worked extensively to try to expose Manafort 's and Trump 's ties to Russia during the 2016 election .
In early spring 2016 , according to the article , she briefed the DNC 's communications staff on Manafort , Trump and their ties to Russia .
In an email to the DNC communications director , she said that she 'd provided information on Manafort to journalist Michael @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for more dirt on Manafort .
DNC officials told Politico at the time that Chalupa undertook her investigations into Trump , Manafort and Russia on her own .
Chalupa told CNN In July 2017 that she `` was not an opposition researcher for the DNC , and the DNC never asked me to go to the Ukrainian Embassy to collect information . ''
She posted on Facebook shortly after publication of the Politico story that it was nonsense .
However , according to Politico , a former DNC official acknowledged that Chalupa was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ staff to arrange to have then-Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko discuss Manafort 's ties to former president Yanukovych .
Democrats have tried over the years to impugn the article , but the Ukrainian embassy in 2019 confirmed to The Hill newspaper that Chalupa did in fact solicit the embassy 's help on her opposition research but the Ukrainians turned her down .
Whatever the case , the Gates-Manafort email exchange provided Mueller 's team with evidence that Democrats were working to create a narrative of Trump-Russia collusion .
It was n't the only evidence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gates ' computers a private investigator 's report commissioned by Manafort 's office entitled `` Unmasking the Left 's Red Scare Anti-Trump Operatives . ''
The report purportedly traced Chalupa 's activities in Ukraine and the United States during the 2016 election .
`` The DNC predictably is trying to distance itself from Chalupa , noting that it paid her to do outreach for its political department , not for her research , '' the 2017 report concluded .
`` But there is no question that she was paid by the DNC throughout @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she provided informed and shaped Clinton campaign strategy . ''
Separately , in August 2016 , a State Department official named Eric Schultz received from Konstantin Kilimnik — a trusted , longtime source in Kiev — similar intelligence about a Clinton campaign in Ukraine to tie Trump to Russia through Manafort .
`` First , it is definitely HRC and her HQ who launched this shitstorm trying to use construction of `` Putin = very bad , Putin = Manafort , Manafort = Trump , therefore Trump = Putin = very bad , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , 2016 ( around the time the stories that would force Manafort to resign as Trump campaign chairman started emerging ) .
Kilimnik was a Ukrainian businessman who worked with Manafort and Gates .
He was routinely interviewed as a sensitive source by U.S. officials in the Kiev embassy .
State Department officials told Mueller 's team they considered Kilimnik to be one of the few reliable Ukrainians who helped the Obama administration .
Mueller 's team , however , has since charged Kilimnik with financial crimes related to the Manafort case and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ believed to have ties to Russian intelligence , a charge Kilimnik denies .
He remains at large .
A month before Kilimnik 's Aug. 22 message to Schultz , CIA officials obtained almost identical information from Russian sources that Clinton had ordered a campaign `` stirring up '' false Russia collusion allegations to tar Trump , according to evidence recently declassified by Ratcliffe .
The CIA was concerned enough about the intelligence that it briefed President Obama and then made an investigative referral to the FBI , which was leading the investigation known @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In the end , none of the warning signs about the Steele dossier and the Clinton campaign 's dirty trick stopped the FBI from continuing its investigation .
And the evidence Mueller gathered showing Clinton ties to the smear campaign mostly remained secret until the last few weeks .

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's office gathered evidence suggesting that Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee launched a political "smear job" in spring 2016 tying Donald Trump to Russia collusion through the lobbying work of his campaign chairman Paul Manafort in Ukraine, according to memos that were excluded from the prosecutor's final report.
The evidence, reviewed by Just the News, includes information obtained by State Department officials from a trusted Ukrainian source, a private investigator's report, and an email exchange suggesting Tony Podesta — a Manafort business associate and brother of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta — tried at one point to slow down the opposition research project.
The evidence — which is additional to records showing the law firm for the Clinton campaign and the DNC funded the infamous "Steele dossier" given to the FBI — was never mentioned in last year's vast, two-volume Mueller Report, which concluded that no Americans colluded with Russia to influence the 2016 election.
The newly surfaced evidence bolsters separate intelligence reporting that Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe made public recently showing the Obama CIA also believed Clinton's campaign had launched a political dirty trick to "vilify" Trump on Russia in an effort to distract from her own controversies.
"We did have evidence to show that early collusion allegations against Trump and Manafort were created or propagated by people who either worked for the DNC or the Clinton campaign, including some efforts that went beyond the Steele dossier," a person with direct knowledge of the Mueller probe told Just the News.
The person spoke only on condition of anonymity because the person did not have permission to speak to the news media.
Asked why the Mueller report did not mention the Clinton campaign tactics, the source answered: "Our job was to report on and prosecute crimes, not write an essay on how political opposition research was conducted by the two parties."
Unredacted emails and other documents gathered by Mueller's team suggest the earliest hint of the Democrats' Russia collusion smear campaign emerged in a May 2016 email exchange between Democratic super-lobbyist Tony Podesta and Manafort's lead business manager in Ukraine, Rick Gates, who also worked as a deputy campaign manager for the Trump campaign. The thread appeared under the subject line: "DNC and Paul Manafort."
Though on opposite sides of the political spectrum, Tony Podesta, Manafort and Gates worked together on lobbying and political consulting projects related to Ukraine's Party of Regions and former President Viktor Yanukovych, who was ousted from power in 2014.
"Last Friday APAC had a meeting at DNC organized by their ethnic outreach office, presenting Democratic Party strategies for presidential elections," Gates emailed Tony Podesta on May 17, 2016. "One of the subjects was a smear campaign against Paul Manafort, which will be launched in a couple of days. The head of the ethnic outreach is of Ukrainian descent and has connections in Ukraine.
"She was able to produce documents linking Manafort to Moscow during his time as adviser to Victor Yanukowych (cq), ousted former Ukrainian president. They will try to link Donald Trump to Putin through Manafort's engagement and money trail of over [a] billion dollars. This was a formal presentation on the part of DNC — I am trying to obtain an audio tape from the meeting. I just wanted to share this with you to make you aware before they start."
Tony Podesta responded by asking what APAC was and Gates wrote back: "You will love this one ... the American Polish Advisory Council."
A few days later, Podesta reported back to Gates in a May 23, 2016 email: "Think I slowed this down."
Other documents show how Gates and Manafort got a first-hand account of what happened at the APAC event with Chalupa from an official with the Polish lobby.
In an interview, Gates confirmed to Just the News that the email exchanges occurred and said that Podesta eventually disclosed to the Manafort team that the DNC's lead figure on the opposition research campaign targeting Trump was a Ukrainian-American woman and DNC contractor named Alexandra Chalupa.
Gates, who later pled guilty to financial crimes and became a cooperating witness in the Mueller probe, added that he was questioned by the prosecutor's team about Chalupa's work and his contacts with Podesta.
"In interview sessions with the Special Counsel's office I was asked about two issues related to Tony Podesta," Gates said. "The first was a series of emails between Tony and me about questions posed by the Associated Press in relation to the lobbying work that Paul's firm and Tony's firm did in Ukraine.
"The second issue was an email exchange I had with Tony Podesta in spring 2016 requesting Tony's help and support about a political opposition project that was being orchestrated by the DNC against Paul Manafort to falsely tie him to Russia as a means of suggesting Trump was tied to Russia," he added. "I told the Special Counsel I reached out to Tony at Paul's request to see if he could help.
"Tony came back to me and identified the DNC operative who was running the operation as Alexandra Chalupa, the head of their ethnic coalitions. Tony also indicated he believed he had been successful in slowing down the opposition research against Paul."
In answers to emailed questions, Tony Podesta told Just the News that the May 2016 email exchange "looks authentic," but he vehemently disputed Gates' claim that he intervened with the DNC to slow down any anti-Trump research or even knew Chalupa's name.
"Never did anything," Podesta wrote. "Didn't tell him Chalupa was at DNC. Didn't know about Chalupa."
"Don't remember what it refers to but clearly not Chalupa and Manafort," he added.
Chalupa, John Podesta, the DNC and Hillary Clinton's office did not immediately return requests seeking comment.
Chalupa's name first emerged in January 2017, when a Politico article reported she had contacts with the Ukrainian embassy in Washington and worked extensively to try to expose Manafort's and Trump's ties to Russia during the 2016 election.
In early spring 2016, according to the article, she briefed the DNC's communications staff on Manafort, Trump and their ties to Russia. In an email to the DNC communications director, she said that she'd provided information on Manafort to journalist Michael Isikoff and connected him to Ukrainian journalists for more dirt on Manafort.
DNC officials told Politico at the time that Chalupa undertook her investigations into Trump, Manafort and Russia on her own. Chalupa told CNN In July 2017 that she "was not an opposition researcher for the DNC, and the DNC never asked me to go to the Ukrainian Embassy to collect information." She posted on Facebook shortly after publication of the Politico story that it was nonsense.
However, according to Politico, a former DNC official acknowledged that Chalupa was encouraged by the DNC to ask embassy staff to arrange to have then-Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko discuss Manafort's ties to former president Yanukovych.
Democrats have tried over the years to impugn the article, but the Ukrainian embassy in 2019 confirmed to The Hill newspaper that Chalupa did in fact solicit the embassy's help on her opposition research but the Ukrainians turned her down.
Whatever the case, the Gates-Manafort email exchange provided Mueller's team with evidence that Democrats were working to create a narrative of Trump-Russia collusion. It wasn't the only evidence.
Mueller's investigation also obtained from Gates' computers a private investigator's report commissioned by Manafort's office entitled "Unmasking the Left's Red Scare Anti-Trump Operatives." The report purportedly traced Chalupa's activities in Ukraine and the United States during the 2016 election.
"The DNC predictably is trying to distance itself from Chalupa, noting that it paid her to do outreach for its political department, not for her research," the 2017 report concluded. "But there is no question that she was paid by the DNC throughout the election cycle and that the research she provided informed and shaped Clinton campaign strategy."
Separately, in August 2016, a State Department official named Eric Schultz received from Konstantin Kilimnik — a trusted, longtime source in Kiev — similar intelligence about a Clinton campaign in Ukraine to tie Trump to Russia through Manafort.
"First, it is definitely HRC and her HQ who launched this shitstorm trying to use construction of "Putin = very bad, Putin = Manafort, Manafort = Trump, therefore Trump = Putin = very bad," Kilimnik emailed Schultz on Aug. 22, 2016 (around the time the stories that would force Manafort to resign as Trump campaign chairman started emerging).
Kilimnik was a Ukrainian businessman who worked with Manafort and Gates. He was routinely interviewed as a sensitive source by U.S. officials in the Kiev embassy. State Department officials told Mueller's team they considered Kilimnik to be one of the few reliable Ukrainians who helped the Obama administration.
Mueller's team, however, has since charged Kilimnik with financial crimes related to the Manafort case and concluded in its final report he was believed to have ties to Russian intelligence, a charge Kilimnik denies. He remains at large.
A month before Kilimnik's Aug. 22 message to Schultz, CIA officials obtained almost identical information from Russian sources that Clinton had ordered a campaign "stirring up" false Russia collusion allegations to tar Trump, according to evidence recently declassified by Ratcliffe.
The CIA was concerned enough about the intelligence that it briefed President Obama and then made an investigative referral to the FBI, which was leading the investigation known as Crossfire Hurricane into alleged Trump-Russia collusion.
In the end, none of the warning signs about the Steele dossier and the Clinton campaign's dirty trick stopped the FBI from continuing its investigation. And the evidence Mueller gathered showing Clinton ties to the smear campaign mostly remained secret until the last few weeks.


thelibertydaily--2020-11-01--Beijing Biden and the Dirty Money Secrets of Politicians [VIDEO]

Hey everybody it 's Chris and it is time for another uh through the political world and uh today we are going to be talking about Joe the dirty money secrets of politician Joe Biden and the dirty Money secrets of politicians .
Um you know it 's interesting this whole thing with Joe Biden and what I hear a lot of people say well , Democrats say is uh everybody does everybody does n't .
That 's true a lot of them do it so I wan na share with you .
how politicians use um their political positions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you wan na see how Joe Biden has been doing this for forty something years uh go to Politico.com .
Politico is not a right-wing website .
It is a um uh center left probably is how I would describe it website .
It 's one of the more popular political websites .
go there and look for an .
Called uh Biden in Biden ink .
I 'm gon na look and see here .
Oh Chris .
Thanks for joining us If you 're here with us .
Let me know @ @ @ @ @ @ @ joining us um but uh he 's been his family has been getting rich off of him for a long time and a lot of people do this a lot of politicians .
A lot of Republicans do it a lot of conservatives ?
do it ?
uh in fact , right now , I just read an article the one who has mastered it is ilhan Omar .
Omar uh I just read an article .
Day 80 % of her campaign expenditures are given to her III .
do n't know @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Ilhan Omar is the Muslim woman up in Minnesota who was married to her brother , so she could um lie cheat and steal her brother into the country .
They committed immigration fraud cuz she was married to her brother and then uh I think she was going to divorce her brother , but she married another guy first so she committed big um but then she eventually .
Divorced her brother and uh married this guy , and then she cheated on that guy to go with her uh chief @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was and now I do n't know if they 're married yet or if they 're just boyfriend girlfriend living together , but a he owns this political operation and 80 % of your expenditures are going there .
So here 's the way the shell game works and and again a lot of politicians use this .
It is not illegal .
I find it to be highly suspect and highly unethical .
Um but this is the way that they do it .
They do it so they can enrich their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
So here 's what happens is a guy who 's a senator brings in millions of dollars and then let 's say he spends $ 3000000 on his uh mailing that year , well , his wife , his sister , his daughter , his uncle , His brother , whoever owns the house .
That 's the way they make the money and then you know , let 's say they pay $ 3000000 , but it only cost a million to do it and then the wife the sister , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ puts the $ 2000000 into .
Own pockets and if it 's a spouse , then it just goes right to the spouse and then it comes with .
I mean this is the way the game has worked for a very long time .
I think it ought to be banned .
I think it ought to be illegal um but it 's not um they have made that decision for themselves Uh Congress has and it 's sort of a wink wink .
Not we all do it .
This is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I think it 's suspect just a campaign and then you know do this and you 're gon na have to pay someone .
To do your mail right and so it 's legal um they 're providing a service for the campaign .
granted it 's marked up and they 're pocketing the money from it um which again why I think it should just be illegal .
It should not be able to your family members should not be able to make money off of your your campaign contributions What Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ did what his family did is they cut deals with other countries and organizations companies in those countries that were tied to those .
Countries in many cases , particularly in the in China where China requires any Americans coming in there to there 's ownership from the CC uh the Chinese government so Hunter and Jim and all those guys they were doing deals with governments and companies that were highly tied to the governments and then uh they were asking Joe to do things for those countries for those companies firing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their thing and that was the that was the .
And this is what made it highly illegal , was he was actually changing policy In many of these cases , Joe was overseen .
He was the point man on Ukraine to my understanding .
He was the point man on Iraq when his brother got AI think a billion and a half dollar uh contract to build homes in Iraq .
um this is what happens is he was selling his influence .
see if I 'm bringing in the money @ @ @ @ @ @ @ again , which I think should be .
Illegal because it 's unethical you bring in money , but at least I 'm paying for something that 's actually being done .
it 's being provided for right um in this case , it was prepaid it was to purchase the influence .
Everybody knows that even Biden under Biden said it , I probably would n't get much in life If my last name was n't Biden , they were buying the Biden name and then they were hoping that Joe was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he was from the emails from Tony Blinky , giving his cellphones over all the documentations by the way if you 're a Democrat .
And I have friends that are saying this there is no evidence uh I do n't know what you want for evidence for if if the only thing that would suffice is for Joe Biden to stand up say , I did it .
Please lock me up for treason um thousands of emails thousands of videos thousands of pictures uh the guy who was the Ceo of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over three cellphones like I do n't know what else you want uh to do this but Biden was .
Running the show by running the show and he was using American tax money that billion dollars he said you are not yet unless you fire this prosecutor that is obstruction that abusive power he had ah money laundering ah tax avail you know the one ah email that says ah H a ten percent set aside held by H for the big guy this tax of ah it 's tax away So @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and uh lot of criminal activity from Joe Biden different from the other dirty little secrets that most politicians have , which I agree are dirty and they should n't be part of politics , but they are and so they 're they 're legal but by the legal standards of what uh politicians are required to do or not required to do what Joe Biden was doing was completely and totally illegal .
and that 's why he should go to prison um and .
We need to pray that Trump wins @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden wins the first thing they 're gon na do is stop all those uh investigations into that .
Um one of the questions I thought should have been asked at the uh at the debate would have been if you beat me , Trump should look down to if you beat me .
Do you make a promise here and now that you will not stop any investigations into yours or your son 's criminal activity and make him say .
Of course , not I 'll I 'll point an independent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what should have happened , but that will stop if Trump gets another 4 years .
Frankly , you know people like why do they hate him so much and all this kind of stuff I honestly believe it is my opinion that the war against Trump is about making sure he does n't have enough time to figure out what they did and prosecute them for that de spying on the campaign .
I 'm at the point now where anybody who says to me , Oh , come on , you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
There 's no evidence I you are either too stupid to be my friend uh or to hang around with or you 're in on it .
It 's truly only .
One of those two things you 're either in on it you 're in on the corruption or you 're down with the corruption so your team can win or you 're just a complete tool it there is no debating this right Uh you ca n't say that what 's on Hunter Biden 's laptop is n't uh is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 'll give you one more thought about Hunter 's laptop you know um I believe that Joe Biden should never be elected president of the United States and again hunters are screwed up dude .
I mean , drugs and hookers , and you know all sorts of crazy stuff um but .
I think that um one of the reasons why we should never allow Joe Biden office is because what if everything on that ?
what if everything is n't on that laptop ?
what if and there 's a lot @ @ @ @ @ @ @ heard a lot of dirty crazy rotten hideous illegal stuff .
Uh I do n't know have n't seen it , but that 's what I 've heard and seems to be general consensus .
but what if everything is n't on that laptop ?
what happens if um there are other videos .
Maybe I really horrific things even more horrific .
Some things on the laptop are horror .
what if even more horrific things on that laptop and in the middle of some negotiation , Xi Jinping says he step @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and I wan na show you something and an aid hands him an iPad and he shows him something horrific that Hunter Biden did that no one has ever seen before and he says you 're gon na sign this .
Or the whole world is going to see this tomorrow .
What if that 's the case that would there is reason enough to believe that the bids have been involved in so many other things that it has disqualified job .
I would say even if we did n't have evidence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it , which we do , it 's it 's a done deal .
We all know that he has he 's involved in it .
you 'd have to be either a hyper hyper hyperpartisan or an idiot to not realize that he 's .
In it um and so um , I think that the family has put him in such a position that he will be compromised from day one because he will never know think about all the other cities that the drug fueled sex Hunter Biden has gone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the other places he tried to do business those people what if they have something on him or who knows what kind of crazy stuff is brother Jim was involved in um you know and so very important .
For us to understand the dirty little secrets that a lot of politicians are using and again it right wing and left wing .
It 's Republicans .
it 's Democrats funnel money to their families .
These things ought to be illegal .
They 're certainly unethical , but what Joe Biden did @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he should be brought up on Rico charges uh money laundering tax evasion abusive power all those kinds of things they all do it .
I do n't know that they all do it , but I 'll go with you when you say they all do it most of them and a lot of them do .
And it 's unethical should be made illegal .
You should challenge your representative to make sure that it becomes illegal , but on the other hand what Joe Biden did was far worse far @ @ @ @ @ @ @ illegal , and he ought to be charged indicted convicted and imprisoned for it .
I know that sounds harsh , but I would say the same thing it was Trump .
I used to say if I found out that Trump really was a Russian asset , I 'd sign up to flip the switch and drop them to the gallows because we are not a nation .
Men we a nation of laws and the highest levels of our country .
They 're not above the law , even though they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a Republican or a democrat when they break the law , they ought to be um they ought to be punished for breaking the law .
Joe Biden has punched the law has disqualified himself as president of the United States and uh should never be elected .
We need to pray that he is not elected and that we get four more years and we can finish out this investigation as Trump put it investigate the investigators now it 's time let 's make sure that those who 've committed treason against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Alright , take care my friends and I 'll talk to you soon .
Buh bye .

Unsupported Browser You're using a browser that isn't supported by Facebook, so we've redirected you to a simpler version to give you the best experience.


thelibertydaily--2020-11-01--Watch: Latino Border Patrol Agents Discuss Benefits of Secure Borders on Their Communities

Several Latino members of the union that represents U.S. Border Patrol agents took to social media to talk about the positive effects of border enforcement .
The agents described the benefit to Hispanic communities across the country .
In a series of videos , both in English and Spanish shared on Twitter , officials with National Border Patrol Council ( NBPC ) provided a glimpse into their personal experiences as Border Patrol agents and voiced their support for U.S. President Donald Trump .
In one of the videos , NBPC Vice-President Art Del Cueto said that the Latino community has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ We ’ ve had the highest average annual income among Latino communities and minorities , ” Del Cueto said .
“ The lowest unemployment rate among Latino communities and minorities.
” In another video , NBPC member Maria Salcido said she was a mother of four and the daughter of legal immigrants .
In her video , Salcido said her relatives supported her career in law enforcement .
“ They understand that rule of law keeps the Latino community safe , ” NBPC member Gabriel Class said he was the son @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Puerto Rican father .
“ In New York , I personally witnessed the negative effects of illegal immigration , ” Class said .
NBPC Local 2544 Vice President Jose Romero claimed that Trump ’ s policies had been beneficial to Puerto Ricans both on the island and the mainland .
Ildefonso Ortiz is an award-winning journalist with Breitbart Texas .
He co-founded Breitbart Texas ’ Cartel Chronicles project with Brandon Darby and senior Breitbart management .
You can follow him on Twitter and on Facebook .
He can be contacted at Iortiz @ @ @

Several Latino members of the union that represents U.S. Border Patrol agents took to social media to talk about the positive effects of border enforcement. The agents described the benefit to Hispanic communities across the country.
In a series of videos, both in English and Spanish shared on Twitter, officials with National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) provided a glimpse into their personal experiences as Border Patrol agents and voiced their support for U.S. President Donald Trump.
In one of the videos, NBPC Vice-President Art Del Cueto said that the Latino community has flourished under Trump’s immigration policies.
“We’ve had the highest average annual income among Latino communities and minorities,” Del Cueto said. “The lowest unemployment rate among Latino communities and minorities.”
In another video, NBPC member Maria Salcido said she was a mother of four and the daughter of legal immigrants. In her video, Salcido said her relatives supported her career in law enforcement.
WATCH: Member of the @BPUnion, and single mother of four, Maria Salcido speaks on behalf of @realDonaldTrump’s #Immigration policies and the benefits to the #Latino community. @TeamTrump @TrumpWarRoom pic.twitter.com/F8IB8ANqEd — Border Patrol Union – NBPC (@BPUnion) October 31, 2020
“They understand that rule of law keeps the Latino community safe,”
NBPC member Gabriel Class said he was the son of an African American mother and a Puerto Rican father. “In New York, I personally witnessed the negative effects of illegal immigration,” Class said.
WATCH (in English & Spanish): Member of the @BPUnion Gabriel Class, born to a African-American mother and Puerto Rican father, gives a personal account of the negative impact of #Illegal #Immigration in the #Latino community of #NYC. @realDonaldTrump @TeamTrump @TrumpWarRoom pic.twitter.com/h5v1dDcZYu — Border Patrol Union – NBPC (@BPUnion) October 31, 2020
NBPC Local 2544 Vice President Jose Romero claimed that Trump’s policies had been beneficial to Puerto Ricans both on the island and the mainland.
WATCH (in English & Spanish): @BPUnion Local 2544 VP (Tucson) Jose Marrero gives a personal account of the positive impact @realDonaldTrump has had on Puerto Ricans in the #UnitedStates mainland and #PuertoRico proper. @TeamTrump@TrumpWarRoompic.twitter.com/4BZaRYhPMn — Border Patrol Union – NBPC (@BPUnion) October 31, 2020
Ildefonso Ortiz is an award-winning journalist with Breitbart Texas. He co-founded Breitbart Texas’ Cartel Chronicles project with Brandon Darby and senior Breitbart management. You can follow him on Twitter and on Facebook. He can be contacted at Iortiz@breitbart.com.


thelibertydaily--2020-11-01--SCOTUS to Hear Arguments in Five Cases in First Week of November

On Nov. 2 , 2020 , the Supreme Court of the United States will begin its November sitting .
All arguments during its November and December sittings will be conducted via teleconference with live audio .
The court made the decision to hold proceedings this way in accordance with public health guidance in response to COVID-19 .
In the first week of November , the court will hear arguments in five cases .
Each case will be allotted one hour for oral argument : • In U.S .
Fish and Wildlife Service v. Sierra Club , the Sierra Club challenged @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) rule and a biological opinion from the U.S .
Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service ( collectively , Services ) .
During that litigation , the Sierra Club submitted a Freedom of Information Act ( FOIA ) request for draft documents from a consultation between the three agencies that took place between 2011 and 2014 .
The Services released some documents but withheld others under FOIA Exemption 5 .
The Sierra Club sued Services in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California , which ruled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could withhold others .
On appeal , the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court ’ s decision .
The government petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for review .
The issues : Whether FOIA ’ s Exemption 5 protects draft documents from compelled disclosure if the documents were ( 1 ) created during a formal interagency consultation process under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act and ( 2 ) later modified in the consultation process .
• In Salinas v. United States Railroad Retirement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ annuity with the United States Railroad Retirement Board ’ s Disability Benefits Division in 2006 .
The application was denied .
Salinas appealed to the Board to reconsider .
The Board denied the request .
In 2013 , Salinas filed a new application for disability annuity .
The Board granted the annuity .
Salinas appealed the annuity ’ s start date and the amount and requested that his prior applications be reviewed .
The Board denied the request .
On appeal , the 5th Circuit dismissed Salinas ’ petition for review .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The issue : Whether , under Section 5 ( f ) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act and Section 8 of the Railroad Retirement Act , the Railroad Retirement Board ’ s denial of a request to reopen a prior benefits determination is a final decision that is subject to judicial review .
• In Jones v. Mississippi , Brett Jones , a fifteen-year-old , killed his grandfather .
Jones was tried for murder in the Circuit Court of Lee County , Mississippi .
He was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Court ’ s decision in Miller v. Alabama ( 2012 ) , the Mississippi Supreme Court ordered the county circuit court to hold a sentencing rehearing .
The circuit court resentenced Jones to life in prison without parole .
Jones appealed to the Mississippi Court of Appeals , which rejected his argument to reverse the sentence .
The state supreme court then held oral arguments for the case before dismissing it .
Jones petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for review .
The issue : Whether the 8th Amendment requires the sentencing authority to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ permanently incorrigible before imposing a sentence of life without parole .
• In Borden v. United States , Charles Borden Jr. pleaded guilty to possessing a firearm as a felon .
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee , relying on the 6th Circuit Court ’ s decision in United States v. Verwiebe ( 2017 ) sentenced Borden to nine years and seven months of imprisonment under the Armed Career Criminal Act ( ACCA ) .
Borden objected to his sentence , arguing the district court ’ s application of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ protections .
On appeal , the 6th Circuit affirmed the district court ’ s ruling .
Borden petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for review .
The issue : Does the “ use of force ” clause in the ACCA encompass crimes with a mens rea of mere recklessness ?
• In Fulton v. City of Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , the city of Philadelphia ’ s Department of Human Services began an investigation into two of its foster care provider agents for potential violations of the city ’ s anti-discrimination laws in 2018 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the agencies refused to work with same-sex couples seeking to become foster parents .
One of the agencies was a religious nonprofit organization , Catholic Social Services ( “ CSS ” ) .
CSS confirmed that it would not certify same-sex couples as foster parents .
The city stopped referring foster children to the agency .
CSS filed suit against the city in district court , citing violations of its rights under the First Amendment and under Pennsylvania ’ s Religious Freedom Protection Act .
The district court denied the request .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ seeking emergency injunctive relief pending appeal .
The circuit court denied the request .
Then , CSS filed an emergency application to the Supreme Court for an injunction pending appeal or an immediate grant of certiorari .
The Court denied the request .
On appeal , the 3rd Circuit affirmed the district court ’ s ruling .
Sharonell Fulton petitioned the Supreme Court for review .
( 1 ) Whether free exercise plaintiffs can only succeed by proving a particular type of discrimination claim – namely that the government would allow the same @ @ @ @ @ @ @ views – as two circuits have held , or whether courts must consider other evidence that a law is not neutral and generally applicable , as six circuits have held ?
( 2 ) Whether Employment Division v. Smith should be revisited ?
( 3 ) Whether a government violates the First Amendment by conditioning a religious agency ’ s ability to participate in the foster care system on taking actions and making statements that directly contradict the agency ’ s religious beliefs ?
Here are the upcoming dates of interest in November @ @ @ @ @ @ @ release orders and hear arguments in two cases .
• November 3 : SCOTUS will hear arguments in two cases .
• November 4 : SCOTUS will hear arguments in one case .
• November 9 : SCOTUS will release orders and hear arguments in two cases .
• November 10 : SCOTUS will hear arguments in one case .
• November 30 : SCOTUS will hear arguments in two cases .
As of October 28 , SCOTUS has agreed to hear 41 cases during its 2020-2021 term .
Of those , 12 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but were delayed due to the coronavirus pandemic .

by Kate Carsella
On Nov. 2, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States will begin its November sitting. All arguments during its November and December sittings will be conducted via teleconference with live audio. The court made the decision to hold proceedings this way in accordance with public health guidance in response to COVID-19.
In the first week of November, the court will hear arguments in five cases. Each case will be allotted one hour for oral argument:
November 2
• In U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service v. Sierra Club, the Sierra Club challenged a new Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule and a biological opinion from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service (collectively, Services). During that litigation, the Sierra Club submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for draft documents from a consultation between the three agencies that took place between 2011 and 2014. The Services released some documents but withheld others under FOIA Exemption 5. The Sierra Club sued Services in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, which ruled Services had to disclose some documents but could withhold others. On appeal, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court’s decision. The government petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for review.
The issues: Whether FOIA’s Exemption 5 protects draft documents from compelled disclosure if the documents were (1) created during a formal interagency consultation process under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act and (2) later modified in the consultation process.
• In Salinas v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, Manfredo Salinas applied for disability annuity with the United States Railroad Retirement Board’s Disability Benefits Division in 2006. The application was denied. Salinas appealed to the Board to reconsider. The Board denied the request. In 2013, Salinas filed a new application for disability annuity. The Board granted the annuity. Salinas appealed the annuity’s start date and the amount and requested that his prior applications be reviewed. The Board denied the request. On appeal, the 5th Circuit dismissed Salinas’ petition for review. In 2019, Salinas petitioned SCOTUS for review.
The issue: Whether, under Section 5(f) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act and Section 8 of the Railroad Retirement Act, the Railroad Retirement Board’s denial of a request to reopen a prior benefits determination is a final decision that is subject to judicial review.
November 3
• In Jones v. Mississippi, Brett Jones, a fifteen-year-old, killed his grandfather. Jones was tried for murder in the Circuit Court of Lee County, Mississippi. He was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. Alabama (2012), the Mississippi Supreme Court ordered the county circuit court to hold a sentencing rehearing. The circuit court resentenced Jones to life in prison without parole. Jones appealed to the Mississippi Court of Appeals, which rejected his argument to reverse the sentence. The state supreme court then held oral arguments for the case before dismissing it. Jones petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for review.
The issue: Whether the 8th Amendment requires the sentencing authority to make a finding that a juvenile is permanently incorrigible before imposing a sentence of life without parole.
• In Borden v. United States, Charles Borden Jr. pleaded guilty to possessing a firearm as a felon. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, relying on the 6th Circuit Court’s decision in United States v. Verwiebe (2017) sentenced Borden to nine years and seven months of imprisonment under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). Borden objected to his sentence, arguing the district court’s application of Verwiebe to his case violated due process protections. On appeal, the 6th Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling. Borden petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for review.
The issue: Does the “use of force” clause in the ACCA encompass crimes with a mens rea of mere recklessness?
November 4
• In Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the city of Philadelphia’s Department of Human Services began an investigation into two of its foster care provider agents for potential violations of the city’s anti-discrimination laws in 2018. The investigation was based on an allegation that the agencies refused to work with same-sex couples seeking to become foster parents. One of the agencies was a religious nonprofit organization, Catholic Social Services (“CSS”). CSS confirmed that it would not certify same-sex couples as foster parents. The city stopped referring foster children to the agency. CSS filed suit against the city in district court, citing violations of its rights under the First Amendment and under Pennsylvania’s Religious Freedom Protection Act. The district court denied the request. CSS appealed to the 3rd Circuit, seeking emergency injunctive relief pending appeal. The circuit court denied the request. Then, CSS filed an emergency application to the Supreme Court for an injunction pending appeal or an immediate grant of certiorari. The Court denied the request. On appeal, the 3rd Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling. Sharonell Fulton petitioned the Supreme Court for review.
The issues:
(1) Whether free exercise plaintiffs can only succeed by proving a particular type of discrimination claim – namely that the government would allow the same conduct by someone who held different religious views – as two circuits have held, or whether courts must consider other evidence that a law is not neutral and generally applicable, as six circuits have held?
(2) Whether Employment Division v. Smith should be revisited?
(3) Whether a government violates the First Amendment by conditioning a religious agency’s ability to participate in the foster care system on taking actions and making statements that directly contradict the agency’s religious beliefs?
Upcoming SCOTUS dates
Here are the upcoming dates of interest in November:
• November 2: SCOTUS will release orders and hear arguments in two cases.
• November 3: SCOTUS will hear arguments in two cases.
• November 4: SCOTUS will hear arguments in one case.
• November 6: SCOTUS will conference.
• November 9: SCOTUS will release orders and hear arguments in two cases.
• November 10: SCOTUS will hear arguments in one case.
• November 13: SCOTUS will conference
• November 16: SCOTUS will release orders.
• November 20: SCOTUS will conference.
• November 23: SCOTUS will release orders.
• November 30: SCOTUS will hear arguments in two cases.
As of October 28, SCOTUS has agreed to hear 41 cases during its 2020-2021 term. Of those, 12 were originally scheduled for the 2019-2020 term but were delayed due to the coronavirus pandemic.
– – –
Kate Carsella is a reporter for Ballotpedia.


thelibertydaily--2020-11-02--President Trump Stands Defiant Despite Minnesota Chi-Com Virus Restrictions: ‘They’d Thought I’d Can

President Trump Stands Defiant Despite Minnesota Chi-Com Virus Restrictions: ‘They’d Thought I’d Cancel, But I’m Not Canceling’

President Donald Trump defiantly campaigned Friday in the Democratic Party stronghold of Minnesota , despite efforts — which Trump blamed on state leaders — to limit the size of the crowd at his rally .
The official rally at the Rochester airport was capped at about 250 people to comply with state COVID-19 rules , WCCO-TV reported .
Hundreds more people who gathered outside the airport were able to see Trump via a live video feed after the president delivered brief in-person remarks to the overflow crowd .
Trump , who is trying to flip a state that last gave @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nominee in 1972 , scolded Minnesota leaders for trying to suppress his campaign .
“ We ’ re having a problem with some people in Minnesota where they have a cap because Biden goes there and he can ’ t draw flies ; he can ’ t draw anybody .
Gets a few cars , I guess , and they honk their horn , ” Trump told reporters before leaving Washington , D.C. , for rallies in Michigan , Wisconsin and Minnesota .
TRENDING : SEAL Team 6 Rescues Young American In Daring @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In The Process “ So we have 25,000 people in Minnesota , which is our last stop today .
Twenty-five thousand people want to be there .
And they say you can only have 250 people , ” the president added .
“ So they ’ d thought I ’ d cancel , but I ’ m not canceling .
And we ’ ll find out what happens .
But we have 25,000 people in Minnesota , ” Trump said .
“ But they ’ re angry at Omar .
They ’ re @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s going on in Minnesota .
And I think it ’ s going to flip for the first time since 1972 , ” he said , referring to progressive Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota .
During Trump ’ s rally , he lashed out at Gov .
Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison , both Democrats .
“ We were given a very , very hard time by your so-called leaders , but they ’ re not very good leaders as you found out during the riots , and we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ years at our great White House , ” he said .
“ As you know , there are at least 25,000 people who wanted to be here tonight .
We just saw a lot of them .
Wanted to pay our respects .
They were here for a long time .
They waited and waited , and then the governor did bad things , ” Trump added .
“ Your far-left Democrat Attorney General , Keith Ellison , and your Democrat governor tried to shut down our rally , silence the people of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your rights .
They thought he would cancel — a word they are very familiar with , cancel .
Cancel culture .
But I said , ‘ No way , I will never abandon the people of Minnesota .
I will come up .
I will come up , ' ” he said .
“ I want to thank the thousands of people outside who were barred from entry by radical Democrats .
You are American patriots.
” Trump then criticized Ellison ’ s treatment of Trump ’ s supporters .
“ When @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the city of Minneapolis earlier this year , Keith Ellison did not ask them to submit a permit .
He told the throngs of violent demonstrators , ‘ By all means , exercise your First Amendment rights.
’ He said that prior to them ripping down your city , ” he said .
Trump said Ellison treated his supporters “ like second-class citizens .
He believes that the pro-American voters have fewer rights than anti-American demonstrators .
Keith Ellison and Joe Biden want to imprison you in your homes while letting anarchists , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ destroy your cities and states.
” Trump said his campaign is battling “ the arrogant far-left political class .
“ They want one set of rules for you and no rules for themselves .
Biden and the left-wing Democrats treat law enforcement like criminals , and they treat criminals like heroes .
They lecture you on morality while they support sanctuary cities that get innocent Americans robbed , raped , maimed and murdered .
They ban you from going to church while they let left-wing extremists burned down the church.
” If he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ embrace policies that will hurt Americans , Trump said .
“ A vote for Joe Biden is a vote to put far-left radicals like Keith Ellison and Ilhan Omar and AOC plus three .
And gun grabber Beto O ’ Rourke wants to take your guns away , wants to destroy your Second Amendment , ” Trump said .
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal .

President Donald Trump defiantly campaigned Friday in the Democratic Party stronghold of Minnesota, despite efforts — which Trump blamed on state leaders — to limit the size of the crowd at his rally.
The official rally at the Rochester airport was capped at about 250 people to comply with state COVID-19 rules, WCCO-TV reported. Hundreds more people who gathered outside the airport were able to see Trump via a live video feed after the president delivered brief in-person remarks to the overflow crowd.
Trump, who is trying to flip a state that last gave its electoral votes to a Republican presidential nominee in 1972, scolded Minnesota leaders for trying to suppress his campaign.
“We’re having a problem with some people in Minnesota where they have a cap because Biden goes there and he can’t draw flies; he can’t draw anybody. Gets a few cars, I guess, and they honk their horn,” Trump told reporters before leaving Washington, D.C., for rallies in Michigan, Wisconsin and Minnesota.
We are covering President Trump’s rallly in Rochester today. The crowd inside has been capped at 250 so a jumbotron has been set up outside for those who couldn’t get in. #wcco pic.twitter.com/QFsnU3C8Ft — John Lauritsen (@JDLauritsen) October 30, 2020
“So we have 25,000 people in Minnesota, which is our last stop today. Twenty-five thousand people want to be there. And they say you can only have 250 people,” the president added.
“So they’d thought I’d cancel, but I’m not canceling. And we’ll find out what happens. But we have 25,000 people in Minnesota,” Trump said.
“But they’re angry at Omar. They’re angry at all of this stuff that’s going on in Minnesota. And I think it’s going to flip for the first time since 1972,” he said, referring to progressive Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota.
During Trump’s rally, he lashed out at Gov. Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison, both Democrats.
“We were given a very, very hard time by your so-called leaders, but they’re not very good leaders as you found out during the riots, and we’re going to win four more years at our great White House,” he said.
“As you know, there are at least 25,000 people who wanted to be here tonight. We just saw a lot of them. Wanted to pay our respects. They were here for a long time. They waited and waited, and then the governor did bad things,” Trump added.
“Your far-left Democrat Attorney General, Keith Ellison, and your Democrat governor tried to shut down our rally, silence the people of Minnesota and take away your freedom and your rights. They thought he would cancel — a word they are very familiar with, cancel. Cancel culture. But I said, ‘No way, I will never abandon the people of Minnesota. I will come up. I will come up,'” he said.
“I want to thank the thousands of people outside who were barred from entry by radical Democrats. You are American patriots.”
Trump then criticized Ellison’s treatment of Trump’s supporters.
“When large numbers of rioters and vandals sacked the city of Minneapolis earlier this year, Keith Ellison did not ask them to submit a permit. He told the throngs of violent demonstrators, ‘By all means, exercise your First Amendment rights.’ He said that prior to them ripping down your city,” he said.
“Keith Ellison sided with flag-burning extremists over law-abiding Americans.”
Trump said Ellison treated his supporters “like second-class citizens. He believes that the pro-American voters have fewer rights than anti-American demonstrators. Keith Ellison and Joe Biden want to imprison you in your homes while letting anarchists, agitators and vandals roam free as they destroy your cities and states.”
Trump said his campaign is battling “the arrogant far-left political class.
“They want one set of rules for you and no rules for themselves. Biden and the left-wing Democrats treat law enforcement like criminals, and they treat criminals like heroes. They lecture you on morality while they support sanctuary cities that get innocent Americans robbed, raped, maimed and murdered. They ban you from going to church while they let left-wing extremists burned down the church.”
If he is elected, Democrat Joe Biden will embrace policies that will hurt Americans, Trump said.
“A vote for Joe Biden is a vote to put far-left radicals like Keith Ellison and Ilhan Omar and AOC plus three. And gun grabber Beto O’Rourke wants to take your guns away, wants to destroy your Second Amendment,” Trump said.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.