thelibertydaily--2020-09-12--Poll: Oregon Voters Disapprove of Portland “Protests,” Call Them ‘Mostly Violent Riots’ and Want MOR

Poll: Oregon Voters Disapprove of Portland “Protests,” Call Them ‘Mostly Violent Riots’ and Want MORE Police Force

A recent survey found that a majority of Oregon voters do not believe the Portland protests to be `` mostly peaceful '' and a plurality urge police to use greater force to quell the violence .
DHM Research , a Portland-based research firm , conducted a statewide study that that focused on voter opinions on the relentless protests that have continued in Oregon 's largest city for over 100 days since George Floyd 's death in May , causing millions of dollars in property damage and disturbing civilians in residential neighborhoods .
A split was evident throughout the poll among @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to skew younger and identify as BIPOC and LGBT .
Most Oregonians believe that the protests in Portland have been `` mostly violent . ''
At the same time , just 29 percent feel that the Portland police have used too much force .
56 percent of Oregon voters believe that the Portland protests have been `` mostly violent '' while 36 percent think that the consecutive nights of rioting have been `` mostly peaceful . ''
7 percent are unsure .
Partisan differences have characterised voter assessments .
57 percent of Democrats @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mostly peaceful '' compared to 83 percent of Republicans who assert that the civil disturbances have been `` mostly violent . ''
Oregon voters are more likely to believe that Portland police have not used enough force in their crowd control tactics .
42 percent advocate for heftier dispersal methods compared to 29 percent who want softer responses , which over half of the 18 through 29 age range and minority voters constitute .
Just above a quarter feel that police use the right amount and 11 percent are unsure .
45 percent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those aged above 45 believe that the police are not using enough force .
A majority of Oregon voters believe that “ riot ” is a more accurate description than “ protest ” of the recurring activity in Portland , with 55 percent for `` riot '' to 37 percent for `` protest . ''
Republicans , voters above 45 years of age , rural residents , and those who obtained a high school degree or less push for the `` riot '' label .
Democrats , young voters under 30-years-old , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nightly occurrences `` protests . ''
Two-thirds of Oregon voters disapprove of the ongoing protests in Portland and few believe that the civil unrest has been beneficial to black Portlanders , race relations , or police reform efforts .
By a margin of more than two to one , more Oregon voters disapprove of the protests in Portland than approve of them , with 66 percent opposing compared to 31 percent in favor .
The Portland metro area paralleled the disapproval-to-approval ratio .
Voters ages 18 through 29 are the only group to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ color are split in their evaluation with 49 percent approving and 46 percent disapproving .
Beyond general approval , voters were asked if the protests in Portland have been more helpful or harmful to black citizens in Portlanders , race relations , and police reform attempts .
On all accounts , most voters do not believe that the protests are constructive to the causes .
Those endorsing the protests remained below the 30th percentile .
52 percent of voters ages 18 through 29 and 51 percent of voters of colour feel that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
However , 39 percent of minority voters are less likely to believe that the protests are aiding race relations .
Overall , 46 percent of voters approve of the Portland Police Bureau ’ s response to the ongoing protests and 45 percent disapprove .
Metro area voters mirrored their assessment of local law enforcement .
Responding to an open-ended question format , 30 percent of voters named the ongoing protests as the most important issue that state leaders should address .
In fact , roughly twice as many mentioned the protests compared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ economy at 13 percent .
Racism and police reform were tagged significantly more among Gen Z and millennial voters aged 18 through 29 .
The Sept. 3 through Sept. 8 online survey consisted of 502 Oregon voters and took approximately 15 minutes to complete .
DHM Research noted that its methodology is `` a sufficient sample size to assess Oregonians ’ opinions generally and to review findings by multiple subgroups . ''
Respondents were contacted by a professional online panel .
In gathering responses , a variety of quality control measures were employed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and real time monitoring of responses .
To ensure a representative sample , demographic quotas were set , and data weighted by gender , age , area of the state , political party and education to reflect the profile of the November general election turnout .

A recent survey found that a majority of Oregon voters do not believe the Portland protests to be "mostly peaceful" and a plurality urge police to use greater force to quell the violence.
DHM Research, a Portland-based research firm, conducted a statewide study that that focused on voter opinions on the relentless protests that have continued in Oregon's largest city for over 100 days since George Floyd's death in May, causing millions of dollars in property damage and disturbing civilians in residential neighborhoods.
A split was evident throughout the poll among age and racial demographics. Rioters tend to skew younger and identify as BIPOC and LGBT.
Most Oregonians believe that the protests in Portland have been "mostly violent." At the same time, just 29 percent feel that the Portland police have used too much force.
DHS Research survey results published Sept. 10, 2020
56 percent of Oregon voters believe that the Portland protests have been "mostly violent" while 36 percent think that the consecutive nights of rioting have been "mostly peaceful." 7 percent are unsure.
Partisan differences have characterised voter assessments. 57 percent of Democrats feel that the protests have been "mostly peaceful" compared to 83 percent of Republicans who assert that the civil disturbances have been "mostly violent."
Oregon voters are more likely to believe that Portland police have not used enough force in their crowd control tactics. 42 percent advocate for heftier dispersal methods compared to 29 percent who want softer responses, which over half of the 18 through 29 age range and minority voters constitute. Just above a quarter feel that police use the right amount and 11 percent are unsure. 45 percent of white voters and 54 percent of those aged above 45 believe that the police are not using enough force.
DHS Research survey results published Sept. 10, 2020
A majority of Oregon voters believe that “riot” is a more accurate description than “protest” of the recurring activity in Portland, with 55 percent for "riot" to 37 percent for "protest." Republicans, voters above 45 years of age, rural residents, and those who obtained a high school degree or less push for the "riot" label. Democrats, young voters under 30-years-old, and college degree holders choose to call the nightly occurrences "protests."
Two-thirds of Oregon voters disapprove of the ongoing protests in Portland and few believe that the civil unrest has been beneficial to black Portlanders, race relations, or police reform efforts.
By a margin of more than two to one, more Oregon voters disapprove of the protests in Portland than approve of them, with 66 percent opposing compared to 31 percent in favor. The Portland metro area paralleled the disapproval-to-approval ratio.
Voters ages 18 through 29 are the only group to approve of the protests. Voters of color are split in their evaluation with 49 percent approving and 46 percent disapproving.
Beyond general approval, voters were asked if the protests in Portland have been more helpful or harmful to black citizens in Portlanders, race relations, and police reform attempts.
DHS Research survey results published Sept. 10, 2020
On all accounts, most voters do not believe that the protests are constructive to the causes. Those endorsing the protests remained below the 30th percentile. 52 percent of voters ages 18 through 29 and 51 percent of voters of colour feel that the protests in Portland are helping black Portlanders. However, 39 percent of minority voters are less likely to believe that the protests are aiding race relations.
Overall, 46 percent of voters approve of the Portland Police Bureau’s response to the ongoing protests and 45 percent disapprove. Metro area voters mirrored their assessment of local law enforcement.
Responding to an open-ended question format, 30 percent of voters named the ongoing protests as the most important issue that state leaders should address. In fact, roughly twice as many mentioned the protests compared to COVID-19 at 16 percent or the economy at 13 percent. Racism and police reform were tagged significantly more among Gen Z and millennial voters aged 18 through 29.
The Sept. 3 through Sept. 8 online survey consisted of 502 Oregon voters and took approximately 15 minutes to complete. DHM Research noted that its methodology is "a sufficient sample size to assess Oregonians’ opinions generally and to review findings by multiple subgroups."
Respondents were contacted by a professional online panel. In gathering responses, a variety of quality control measures were employed, including questionnaire pre-testing, validation, and real time monitoring of responses. To ensure a representative sample, demographic quotas were set, and data weighted by gender, age, area of the state, political party and education to reflect the profile of the November general election turnout.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-12--Not “Climate Change”: Man Arrested, Charged With Arson in Setting Oregon Fire That Destroyed Several

Not “Climate Change”: Man Arrested, Charged With Arson in Setting Oregon Fire That Destroyed Several Small Towns

A Southern Oregon man is accused of arson in connection with a fire that has caused major damage to several towns in Jackson County .
Michael Jarrod Bakkela , 41 , has arrested on two counts of arson , 15 counts of criminal mischief and 14 counts of reckless endangerment .
The fire Bakkela set is considered to be one of two origins of the Almeda fire , said Oregon State Fire Marshal ’ s office spokesman Rich Tyler .
The two fires quickly merged , Tyler said .
The Jackson County Sheriff ’ s Office said in a news @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a resident of Phoenix saw a person , later identified as Bakkela , lighting a fire behind their house on Quail Lane .
Because there was an impending blaze , the residents who saw him set the fire had to flee their home .
When state troopers and sheriff ’ s deputies arrived , they saw Bakkela standing close to a large fire that was threatening several homes .
Bakkela was arrested and initially lodged in the Jackson County Jail on Tuesday on a charge of possession of methamphetamine .
He remains @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mischief charges .
The Jackson County Sheriff ’ s Office has confirmed that two people have been found dead in the aftermath of the Almeda fire .
One , Tyler said , was determined to have been fire-caused , but was near the first origin of the fire — not the one Bakkela started .
He said it ’ s not yet clear whether the second death is connected to a fire .
Officials say 50 people remain unaccounted for in the the Almeda fire .
The Almeda fire is now 50 percent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has burned more than 5,700 acres .
It has burned more than a thousand homes between the towns of Phoenix and Talent .
Hundreds of businesses have also been damaged , and leaders estimate more than 2,000 residents have lost their homes this week .
Drinking water has been shut off , and power remains out in both towns .
A second wildfire , the South Obenchain fire , continues to burn in Jackson County .
Noelle Crombie and Jim Ryan of The Oregonian/OregonLive contributed to this story .
Subscribe to Oregonian/OregonLive newsletters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ top stories .

A Southern Oregon man is accused of arson in connection with a fire that has caused major damage to several towns in Jackson County.
Michael Jarrod Bakkela, 41, has been arrested on two counts of arson, 15 counts of criminal mischief and 14 counts of reckless endangerment.
The fire Bakkela is accused of setting is considered to be one of two origins of the Almeda fire, said Oregon State Fire Marshal’s office spokesman Rich Tyler. The two fires quickly merged, Tyler said.
The Jackson County Sheriff’s Office said in a news release Friday afternoon that on Tuesday evening, a resident of Phoenix saw a person, later identified as Bakkela, lighting a fire behind their house on Quail Lane. Because there was an impending blaze, the residents who saw him set the fire had to flee their home.
When state troopers and sheriff’s deputies arrived, they saw Bakkela standing close to a large fire that was threatening several homes.
Bakkela was arrested and initially lodged in the Jackson County Jail on Tuesday on a charge of possession of methamphetamine. He remains in jail on the arson and criminal mischief charges.
The Jackson County Sheriff’s Office has confirmed that two people have been found dead in the aftermath of the Almeda fire. One, Tyler said, was determined to have been fire-caused, but was near the first origin of the fire — not the one Bakkela started. He said it’s not yet clear whether the second death is connected to a fire.
Officials say 50 people remain unaccounted for in the the Almeda fire.
The Almeda fire is now 50 percent contained as of Friday morning, and has burned more than 5,700 acres. It has burned more than a thousand homes between the towns of Phoenix and Talent. Hundreds of businesses have also been damaged, and leaders estimate more than 2,000 residents have lost their homes this week. Drinking water has been shut off, and power remains out in both towns.
A second wildfire, the South Obenchain fire, continues to burn in Jackson County.
—Jayati Ramakrishnan; 503-221-4320; jramakrishnan@oregonian.com; @JRamakrishnanOR
Noelle Crombie and Jim Ryan of The Oregonian/OregonLive contributed to this story.
Subscribe to Oregonian/OregonLive newsletters and podcasts for the latest news and top stories.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-12--Author of Dystopian Classics Predicted Face Masks to Enforce Conformity 70 Years Ago

Respected German author Ernst Jünger predicted the ubiquitousness of face masks to enforce conformity and uniformity in a dystopian future society in a novel called The Worker that was published nearly 90 years ago .
With face masks now becoming a mandatory part of the “ new normal , ” the enforcement measures to make people wear them , by both agents of the state and members of the general public , are becoming more dehumanizing and draconian .
This is precisely the scenario envisaged by enigmatic German author Ernst Jünger in his 1932 classic .
As Thomas Crew details @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Mask , the “ eradication of all individuality ” is a running theme of all dystopian literature .
This is expressed by George Orwell in 1984 when he describes the masses as , “ a nation of warriors and fanatics , marching forward in perfect unity , all thinking the same thoughts and shouting the same slogans…three hundred million people all with the same face.
” Crew explains that this theme is dominant in Jünger ’ s The Worker , where , “ The uniformity of the new age is symbolized…by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ society.
” “ It is no coincidence , ” he writes , “ that the mask is again beginning to play a decisive role in public life .
It is appearing in many different ways … be it as a gas mask , with which they are trying to equip entire populations ; be it as a face mask for sport and high speeds , seen on every racing driver ; be it as a safety mask for workplaces exposed to radiation , explosions , or narcotic substances .
We can assume ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prescience , “ that the mask will come to take on functions that we can today hardly imagine.
” Crew explains how the public has been brainwashed to believe that the continuation of life , no matter how stifled , atomized and undignified it may be , is the only consideration .
“ Given the sudden ubiquity of the face mask in 2020 , across the entire globe and in an increasing number of social contexts , it is impossible to avoid the conclusion that this is precisely the sort of development Jünger @ @ @ @ @ @ @ obscure the face reflects the dehumanising tendencies that , for Jünger , underlie the modern period .
It represents another stage in the degradation of the individual that became explicit in the First World War .
Whether as a scrap of material on the battlefield or a cog in the machine of the wartime economy , the modern age has a habit of reducing the human being to a functional object .
Everything “ non-essential ” – everything , that is , that makes us human – is blithely discarded.
” As we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ level of compliance that governments and the media have been able to indoctrinate people to embrace means there is little need for police officers and security officials to enforce mask wearing .
A cowed public , whipped up into a frenzied lust for obedience , will do it for them .
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch .
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here .
Also , I urgently need your financial support here .

Respected German author Ernst Jünger predicted the ubiquitousness of face masks to enforce conformity and uniformity in a dystopian future society in a novel called The Worker that was published nearly 90 years ago.
With face masks now becoming a mandatory part of the “new normal,” the enforcement measures to make people wear them, by both agents of the state and members of the general public, are becoming more dehumanizing and draconian.
This is precisely the scenario envisaged by enigmatic German author Ernst Jünger in his 1932 classic.
As Thomas Crew details in his article The Dystopian Age of the Mask, the “eradication of all individuality” is a running theme of all dystopian literature.
This is expressed by George Orwell in 1984 when he describes the masses as, “a nation of warriors and fanatics, marching forward in perfect unity, all thinking the same thoughts and shouting the same slogans…three hundred million people all with the same face.”
Crew explains that this theme is dominant in Jünger’s The Worker, where, “The uniformity of the new age is symbolized…by the sudden proliferation of the mask in contemporary society.”
“It is no coincidence,” he writes, “that the mask is again beginning to play a decisive role in public life. It is appearing in many different ways … be it as a gas mask, with which they are trying to equip entire populations; be it as a face mask for sport and high speeds, seen on every racing driver; be it as a safety mask for workplaces exposed to radiation, explosions, or narcotic substances. We can assume”, he continues, with an eerie prescience, “that the mask will come to take on functions that we can today hardly imagine.”
Crew explains how the public has been brainwashed to believe that the continuation of life, no matter how stifled, atomized and undignified it may be, is the only consideration.
“Given the sudden ubiquity of the face mask in 2020, across the entire globe and in an increasing number of social contexts, it is impossible to avoid the conclusion that this is precisely the sort of development Jünger had in mind. Our readiness to obscure the face reflects the dehumanising tendencies that, for Jünger, underlie the modern period. It represents another stage in the degradation of the individual that became explicit in the First World War. Whether as a scrap of material on the battlefield or a cog in the machine of the wartime economy, the modern age has a habit of reducing the human being to a functional object. Everything “non-essential” – everything, that is, that makes us human – is blithely discarded.”
As we document in the video below, the level of compliance that governments and the media have been able to indoctrinate people to embrace means there is little need for police officers and security officials to enforce mask wearing.
A cowed public, whipped up into a frenzied lust for obedience, will do it for them.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Also, I urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————


thelibertydaily--2020-09-12--Communist Hammer & Sickle Messaging in Netflix’s Pro-Pedophilia ‘Cuties’

The ‘ Cuties ’ movie that stirred controversy last month following the release of its trailer has now been released and it ’ s even worse – featuring numerous scenes that showcase the vile sexualization of children .
As we previously highlighted , the French production centers around four pre-teen children from a ‘ diverse ’ neighborhood attempting to win a dance competition .
The trailer shows the girls twerking and adopting other sexualized poses .
Even after a massive backlash , Netflix refused to pull the plug on the movie , acknowledging merely that the promo poster for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be changed .
After its release last night , Twitter user Ghost Jim watched the movie and posted several clips which illustrate how the film is basically soft porn for pedophiles .
“ Netflix just released the controversial ‘ Cuties ’ and it ’ s worse than you could imagine .
Make no mistake : Netflix is at the forefront of sexualizing children and normalizing pedophilia !
” he tweeted .
The first clip shows the girls aggressively shaking their backsides while putting their fingers in their mouth .
The next clips shows @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stage in front of judges in a similar manner while an audience watches , some of them applauding , some of them booing .
Note that the dance routine performed by the main characters is very similar to that seen in WAP ( Wet-Ass Pussy ) – a Cardi B song released last month which caused controversy for its overtly sexual dance choreography , something that has since been copied by underage girls across America .
The next scene shows the black girl in the movie vigorously shaking her entire body .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of all .
It shows the girls accusing a security guard of being a “ pervert ” and trying to molest them .
Another security guard then arrives and the black girl begins performing a dance in front of him as he ogles her and the camera lingers on her torso .
“ That ’ s as far as I ’ ll go with this demonic garbage .
No doubt the film has much more .
Netflix is streaming it right into peoples homes where young , impressionable girls can watch it .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to children can pleasure themselves to .
Thanks Netflix !
” remarks the Twitter user .
He then reveals the details of other revolting scenes in the film , including the girls experimenting with webcam porn and a girl taking a photo of her vagina and posting it online .
While Turkey ’ s media watchdog has ordered the film removed from Turkey ’ s Netflix portal , British newspaper the Independent described the movie as an “ important contribution to the coming-of-age genre.
” The New Yorker ’ s blasted a “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by right-wingers , while Rolling Stone called the movie “ a sensitive portrait of growing pains that deserves to be seen.
” Meanwhile , a petition to pressure Netflix into removing the movie has reached over 123,000 signatures .
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch .
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here .
Also , I urgently need your financial support here .

The Netflix movie ‘Cuties’, which has received a massive backlash for sexualizing children, also features subtly placed Communist hammer & sickle messaging in some of its scenes.
“Oh look, there’s the communist symbol paint over the graffiti in the background and prominently displayed during this gross scene. Could it be some sort of message?” asked Twitter user GhostJim.
Oh look, there’s the communist symbol paint over the graffiti in the background and prominently displayed during this gross scene. Could it be some sort of message? pic.twitter.com/ZdaRu60Ad0 — 𝗚𝗵𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗝𝗶𝗺 (@GhostJim4) September 11, 2020
The scene clearly shows that a communist hammer & sickle has been painted over the graffiti on a wall behind the characters.
It’s obvious that the symbol stands out from the rest of the graffiti and was deliberately put there by the film makers.
Despite the fact that Netflix was forced to apologize for a poster promoting the movie last month, the streaming platform refused to apologize for the film itself and in fact defended the movie as a “powerful movie” and a “social commentary against the sexualization of young children.”
This despite the fact that the movie continues innumerable overt scenes of pre-teen children performing sexually suggestive dances, portrays them watching pornography and in one scene shows one of the girl’s breasts.
Claiming that ‘Cuties’ is exposing the dangers of child sexualization by gratuitously showing child sexualization would be akin to actually killing people in a war movie to illustrate the horrors of war.
The number of “journalists” who have defended the vile production also emphasizes once again how the entertainment industry and the media is literally run by perverts and nonces.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Also, I urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————


thelibertydaily--2020-09-12--Shameful: Woke NBA Players Kneel During National Anthem on Anniversary of 9/11

Friday marked the 19th anniversary of the September 11 , 2001 terror attacks against the US .
The overpaid athletes @ @ @ @ @ honor .
They kneeled for the National Anthem on the anniversary of 9/11 .
The @ @ @ @ @ to the victims of the 9/11 terror attacks and the first responders .
TRENDING : @ @ @ @ @ To Move For White Flight Attendant…Shouts In Face Of Passenger : “ Wake up , @ @ @ @ @ ... You don ’ t have white privilege over me ” However , the NBA @ @ @ @ @ Anthem .

Friday marked the 19th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terror attacks against the US.
Approximately 3,000 Americans lost their lives on 9/11.
The overpaid athletes in the NBA have zero honor. They kneeled for the National Anthem on the anniversary of 9/11.
The NBA on Friday paid tribute to the victims of the 9/11 terror attacks and the first responders.
However, the NBA players kneeled during the National Anthem.
Rough look for NBA players to kneel for the national anthem on the anniversary of 9/11. — Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) September 11, 2020
NBA players kneeled during the national anthem on the anniversary of 9/11. They couldn’t even stand to honor the heroes who sacrificed and died. It’s disgusting. — David Hookstead (@dhookstead) September 12, 2020
Everyone knows why @nba kneels. On a day we remember the lives of the 2,996 lives lost, these guys kneel while a service member honors the flag with the anthem. I wish they would understand and know why #UnitedWeStand pic.twitter.com/YML7OWBr6n — Stand Strong (@HatchOnTheRise) September 11, 2020


thelibertydaily--2020-09-12--Lou Dobbs Destroys Lindsey Graham After Years of His Empty Promises to Investigate Obamagate as Chai

Lou Dobbs Destroys Lindsey Graham After Years of His Empty Promises to Investigate Obamagate as Chair of Judiciary Committee

On May 1 , 2019 Lindsey Graham , the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee , promised investigations on how the Mueller probe started .
He made the the comments during testimony by US Attorney General Bill Barr in front of the US Senate .
TRENDING : VIDEO : Black Woman Refuses To Move For White Flight Attendant…Shouts In Face Of Passenger : “ Wake up , it ’ s 2020 !
... You don ’ t have white privilege over me ” Lindsey Graham has scheduled NO COMMITTEE HEARINGS on Deep State , FBI , CIA , Spygate , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Stefan Halper , George Papadopoulos , Tom Fitton , Sidney Powell , Joe diGenova , John Brennan , James Comey , Chris Wray , etc .
Here is the list of the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings since Lindsey Graham made that lie back on May 1 , 2019 .
In October 2019 Maria Bartiromo confronted Lindsey Graham about his promise to call in deep state witnesses before the Senate Judiciary Committee .
Lindsey lied and said he would call in deep state witnesses after the Horowitz Report was released in December .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bartiromo again confronted Senator Lindsey Graham about calling in deep state witnesses before the Senate Judiciary Committee .
Lindsey later said he will wait to call witnesses until the General Flynn case is over .
In the past three months he has called three or four witnesses and treated them with kid gloves .
Now Lindsey is telling Republicans to “ stay tuned.
” This is something Lindsey has been saying for over two years now as he has shirked his responsibility as Judiciary chairman .
Lindsey is a liar and a snake @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scheduled NO COMMITTEE HEARINGS on Deep State , FBI , CIA , Spygate , Hunter Biden , Joe Biden , Robert Mueller , Stefan Halper , George Papadopoulos , Tom Fitton , Sidney Powell , Joe diGenova , John Brennan , James Comey , Chris Wray , etc .

On May 1, 2019 Lindsey Graham, the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, promised investigations on the crooked Mueller probe attorneys.
He made the the comments during testimony by US Attorney General Bill Barr in front of the US Senate.
But Lindsey Graham lied.
Lindsey Graham is a fraud.
Lindsey Graham has scheduled NO COMMITTEE HEARINGS on Deep State, FBI, CIA, Spygate, Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, Mueller, Stefan Halper, George Papadopoulos, Tom Fitton, Sidney Powell, Joe diGenova, John Brennan, James Comey, Chris Wray, etc.
Here is the list of the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings since Lindsey Graham made that lie back on May 1, 2019.
In October 2019 Maria Bartiromo confronted Lindsey Graham about his promise to call in deep state witnesses before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Lindsey lied and said he would call in deep state witnesses after the Horowitz Report was released in December.
He never did.
In a follow-up interview Maria Bartiromo again confronted Senator Lindsey Graham about calling in deep state witnesses before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Lindsey later said he will wait to call witnesses until the General Flynn case is over.
In the past three months he has called three or four witnesses and treated them with kid gloves.
Now Lindsey is telling Republicans to “stay tuned.”
This is something Lindsey has been saying for over two years now as he has shirked his responsibility as Judiciary chairman.
Lindsey is a liar and a snake.
From a reader… Lindsey Graham has scheduled NO COMMITTEE HEARINGS on Deep State, FBI, CIA, Spygate, Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, Robert Mueller, Stefan Halper, George Papadopoulos, Tom Fitton, Sidney Powell, Joe diGenova, John Brennan, James Comey, Chris Wray, etc.
Watch Lou Dobbs rip him apart!


thelibertydaily--2020-09-12--PHONY! After Decades of Sucking Up to the Chi-Coms, Beijing Biden Now Claims He Will Somehow Be ‘Tou

PHONY! After Decades of Sucking Up to the Chi-Coms, Beijing Biden Now Claims He Will Somehow Be ‘Tough’ on Communist China

Joe Biden has one thing in common with his running mate , Kamala Harris .
He says whatever he thinks he needs to say , on any given issue , depending on who he is talking to at the time .
Back in January and February of this year , Biden was going around the country insisting that China is not a threat to the United States .
Now he has changed his tune and is claiming he will be tough on China .
Biden also clearly thinks no one remember that he played an instrumental role in China ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Black Woman Refuses To Move For White Flight Attendant…Shouts In Face Of Passenger : “ Wake up , it ’ s 2020 !
... You don ’ t have white privilege over me ” Biden Says He ’ ll Be Tough On China — His Record Says Otherwise .
Here ’ s How Biden Got It All Wrong On China Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has at times indicated that a new approach to China is needed after decades of a broken foreign policy consensus .
But a look at Biden ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was a central figure in the political establishment ’ s role in facilitating the rise of China .
His campaign website argues that Biden would be tough on China as president but during his four decades of public service Biden has directly contributed to China ’ s rise , and he has defended his previous statements and positions on the campaign trail .
Biden ’ s supposed transformation was likely in response to the tougher approach adopted by President Donald Trump and souring attitudes towards China amid growing tensions and the coronavirus pandemic… @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been mired with inconsistencies as he tries to paint himself as both someone who will be tough on China and also someone who was central to U.S.-China relations in previous decades , The Hill reported .
Here ’ s Joe last spring saying China is no threat to the U.S. That is just one example , but there are many more .
Biden has proved that he can not be trusted on this issue .

Joe Biden has one thing in common with his running mate, Kamala Harris.
He says whatever he thinks he needs to say, on any given issue, depending on who he is talking to at the time.
Back in January and February of this year, Biden was going around the country insisting that China is not a threat to the United States. Now he has changed his tune and is claiming he will be tough on China.
Biden also clearly thinks no one remember that he played an instrumental role in China’s rise.
The Daily Caller reports:
Biden Says He’ll Be Tough On China — His Record Says Otherwise. Here’s How Biden Got It All Wrong On China Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has at times indicated that a new approach to China is needed after decades of a broken foreign policy consensus. But a look at Biden’s record shows how the former vice president was a central figure in the political establishment’s role in facilitating the rise of China. His campaign website argues that Biden would be tough on China as president but during his four decades of public service Biden has directly contributed to China’s rise, and he has defended his previous statements and positions on the campaign trail. Biden’s supposed transformation was likely in response to the tougher approach adopted by President Donald Trump and souring attitudes towards China amid growing tensions and the coronavirus pandemic… Biden’s 2020 presidential campaign has been mired with inconsistencies as he tries to paint himself as both someone who will be tough on China and also someone who was central to U.S.-China relations in previous decades, The Hill reported.
Here’s Joe last spring saying China is no threat to the U.S.
@JoeBiden "China is no threat the the U.S, Come on man" What say you now Joe? pic.twitter.com/z8NTiEu4JZ — The Conservative Latino 🇺🇲 (@Conserv_Latino) April 21, 2020
That is just one example, but there are many more.
Biden has proved that he cannot be trusted on this issue.
Cross posted from American Lookout.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-12--Communist Revolutionary Who Had His Arm Partially Blown Off After Pointing a Gun at 17-Year-Old Kyle

Communist Revolutionary Who Had His Arm Partially Blown Off After Pointing a Gun at 17-Year-Old Kyle Rittenhouse’s Head Cries Victim to CNN Fake News

Gaige Grosskreutz , the 22-year-old Kenosha rioter who had his arm partially blown off by Kyle Rittenhouse after he aggressively rushed at the 17-year-old and pointed a pistol at the child ’ s head , cried victim on CNN .
Grosskreutz had a gun in his hand when he ran up to Rittenhouse , so in self defense , the 17-year-old discharged his weapon , blew off part of Grosskreutz ’ s arm , saving his own life .
A friend of Gaige ’ s said that his only regret was not being able to kill 17-year-old Rittenhouse .
TRENDING @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Move For White Flight Attendant…Shouts In Face Of Passenger : “ Wake up , it ’ s 2020 !
... You don ’ t have white privilege over me ” “ So the kid shot gaige as he drew his weapon and gaige retreated with his gun in hand .
I just talked to Gaige Grosskreutz too his only regret was not killing the kid and hesitating to pull the gun before emptying the entire mag into him .
Coward , ” a friend of Grosskreutz wrote in a chat .
Leave it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be the victim by calling him the “ sole survivor.
” “ I was shot point blank with a .223 round from the shooter , ” Grosskreutz said .
“ And I am now missing 90 % of my bicep .
This has not been easy emotionally , physically .
I ’ m in constant pain , like excruciating pain that just doesn ’ t go away — both in my arm , in my heart.
” Grosskreutz told CNN that he is not a felon and that he has a license to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ m not a felon , ” he said .
“ I have my concealed carry , I ’ ve had it for years .
That was my gun .
My firearm .
I had a legal right to possess it and to possess it concealed.
” “ None of it is true , of what people have been saying as far as their assumptions toward me , at least , ” he said .
“ I ’ m not an Antifa terrorist organizer .
I am a 22-year-old male .
I go to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ my First Amendment right to peacefully protest.
” Grosskreutz argued that he never even used his gun that night .
Because chasing down a minor and pointing a gun at a child ’ s head is so peaceful .
“ I ’ m going through a tough day but like I said , I ’ m a strong person , ” Grosskreutz told CNN crying .
“ But everybody ’ s hurting from this in one way or another .
I walked away with my life that night but two people didn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Rittenhouse shooting Grosskreutz in the arm — notice Grosskreutz is carrying a hand gun .
Rittenhouse was about to get a bullet to the head , but he acted quickly and shot Grosskreutz in self defense .
Grosskreutz begged for a medic after his upper arm was partially blown off by Rittenhouse .
Kyle Rittenhouse was arrested , charged with 6 counts , including one count of intentional homicide and is currently being detained while Gaige Grosskreutz is free to roam and continue to stir up mayhem :

Gaige Grosskreutz
Gaige Grosskreutz, the 22-year-old Kenosha rioter who had his arm partially blown off by Kyle Rittenhouse after he aggressively rushed at the 17-year-old and pointed a pistol at the child’s head, cried victim on CNN.
Grosskreutz had a gun in his hand when he ran up to Rittenhouse, so in self defense, the 17-year-old discharged his weapon, blew off part of Grosskreutz’s arm, saving his own life.
Doctors performed surgery and saved Gaige Grosskreutz’s right arm.
A friend of Gaige’s said that his only regret was not being able to kill 17-year-old Rittenhouse.
“So the kid shot gaige as he drew his weapon and gaige retreated with his gun in hand. I just talked to Gaige Grosskreutz too his only regret was not killing the kid and hesitating to pull the gun before emptying the entire mag into him. Coward,” a friend of Grosskreutz wrote in a chat.
Leave it to CNN to make Grosskreutz out to be the victim by calling him the “sole survivor.”
“I was shot point blank with a .223 round from the shooter,” Grosskreutz said. “And I am now missing 90% of my bicep. This has not been easy emotionally, physically. I’m in constant pain, like excruciating pain that just doesn’t go away — both in my arm, in my heart.”
Grosskreutz told CNN that he is not a felon and that he has a license to carry his firearm.
“I’m not a felon,” he said. “I have my concealed carry, I’ve had it for years. That was my gun. My firearm. I had a legal right to possess it and to possess it concealed.”
“None of it is true, of what people have been saying as far as their assumptions toward me, at least,” he said. “I’m not an Antifa terrorist organizer. I am a 22-year-old male. I go to school. And yeah, I exercise my First Amendment right to peacefully protest.”
Grosskreutz argued that he never even used his gun that night.
Because chasing down a minor and pointing a gun at a child’s head is so peaceful.
“I’m going through a tough day but like I said, I’m a strong person,” Grosskreutz told CNN crying. “But everybody’s hurting from this in one way or another. I walked away with my life that night but two people didn’t.”
Here is close up video of Rittenhouse shooting Grosskreutz in the arm — notice Grosskreutz is carrying a hand gun.
Rittenhouse was about to get a bullet to the head, but he acted quickly and shot Grosskreutz in self defense.
WATCH (GRAPHIC):
It looks like Kyle Rittenhouse was about to get a bullet in the head from a handgun from this angle. pic.twitter.com/8yyWKzcpa1 — Chris Sandoval 🇺🇸 (@firstcitizensam) August 27, 2020
Grosskreutz begged for a medic after his upper arm was partially blown off by Rittenhouse.
WATCH (WARNING: EXTREMELY GRAPHIC):
EXTREMELY GRAPHIC: @Julio_Rosas11 recorded up-close footage of one of the men who tried to attack a man who was on the ground but armed with a semi-auto rifle. Half of his upper arm was blown off. #KenoshaRiots pic.twitter.com/81bFbBl7Dw — Andy Ngô (@MrAndyNgo) August 26, 2020
Kyle Rittenhouse was arrested, charged with 6 counts, including one count of intentional homicide and is currently being detained while Gaige Grosskreutz is free to roam and continue to stir up mayhem:


thelibertydaily--2020-09-12--‘The Atlantic’ Continues Its TDS Tantrum, Calls for End of Nobel Peace Prize After Trump Is Nominate

‘The Atlantic’ Continues Its TDS Tantrum, Calls for End of Nobel Peace Prize After Trump Is Nominated

The Atlantic is a magazine that will be 163 years old two days before the presidential election this year and , lem me tell ya , it ’ s not aging well right now .
Unlike many venerable publications , The Atlantic transitioned rather well to new media .
There was always some very good stuff on the site , which helped offset the usual knee-jerk liberal fare .
Those days appear to be gone .
After its almost universally debunked hit piece about Trump and the military last week , the site has taken extreme umbrage at the fact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Nobel Peace Prize .
Staff writer Graeme Wood wrote a lengthy piece calling for an end to the prize because of this .
He ’ s got issues .
As many with the man who nominated Trump for the UAE/Israel agreement as with Trump himself , it would seem .
Tybring-Gjedde is from Norway ’ s Progress Party , a right-wing populist answer to the established parties of the right and left .
( National parliamentarians are entitled to nominate candidates for the prize .
So are professors , past laureates , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ . )
His nomination of Trump strikes me as preposterous .
“ Other politicians don ’ t pick up the phone to talk , ” Tybring-Gjedde said .
“ He has the ability to be down-to-earth and talk to people at all levels.
” Tybring-Gjedde notes that Alfred Nobel listed as one of the criteria for the winners that they encourage “ peace congresses ” —and what is a peace congress but a conversation between people who are not at peace ?
In my view the deal between the Emirates and Israel is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deal between Israel and the absolute monarchs of a small Gulf state is not a deal between Israel and the people of the Emirates , let alone between Israelis and Palestinians .
Trump ’ s main diplomatic maneuver is to adopt a lickspittle posture toward authoritarians , promising them decades in power in return for a smile and a condo development .
Peace does not mean a web of personal agreements between rich psychopaths .
Wood seeks to delegitimize the nomination because he doesn ’ t like the person doing the nominating , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reason for the nomination .
As we like to say in the world of stand-up comedy , timing is everything .
He published his diaper-soiling ORANGE MAN BAD screed just hours before it was announced that President Trump had been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for a second time this week , this time by a member of the Swedish Parliament , and for the Serbia/Kosovo agreement he brokered .
I wrote about that here yesterday .
Just like that , two of Wood ’ s “ nuke the Nobel ” arguments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the day curled up in the fetal position with juice boxes strewn all about the place after learning of the second nomination .
The recent descent by The Atlantic into Stage Five ORANGE MAN BAD dementia has been , as one friend of mine who used to be an Atlantic fan said , “ Sad.
” I agree .
The Atlantic was one of the few publications that I could still respect , despite its obvious liberal bent .
The place has turned into BuzzFeed overnight .
When that same friend wondered why @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fast I replied , “ The internal polling by the DNC must be awful right now.
” This has been a very good week for President Trump , as evidenced by desperate hot takes like this one in The Atlantic .
We ’ re all on the same flight but I think they may be feeling a little more turbulence where they ’ re sitting .
Kruiser Twitter Kruiser Facebook PJ Media Senior Columnist and Associate Editor Stephen Kruiser is the author of “ Don ’ t Let the Hippies Shower ” and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the Age of Outrage , ” both of which address serious subjects in a humorous way .
Monday through Friday he edits PJ Media ’ s “ Morning Briefing.
” His columns appear twice a week .

Trump Derangement Syndrome at ‘The Atlantic’ Reaches a Fever Pitch
The poor dears.
The Atlantic is a magazine that will be 163 years old two days before the presidential election this year and, lemme tell ya, it’s not aging well right now.
Unlike many venerable publications, The Atlantic transitioned rather well to new media. There was always some very good stuff on the site, which helped offset the usual knee-jerk liberal fare.
Those days appear to be gone.
After its almost universally debunked hit piece about Trump and the military last week, the site has taken extreme umbrage at the fact the President Trump has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. Staff writer Graeme Wood wrote a lengthy piece calling for an end to the prize because of this.
The Atlantic:
Trolls are a Scandinavian invention, straight from the frigid sagas of Norse mythology, but Christian Tybring-Gjedde, a Norwegian parliamentarian, swears that he is not one. Observers of his antics this week could be forgiven for thinking otherwise. On Wednesday, he announced that he had nominated Donald J. Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize.
He’s got issues. As many with the man who nominated Trump for the UAE/Israel agreement as with Trump himself, it would seem.
Tybring-Gjedde is from Norway’s Progress Party, a right-wing populist answer to the established parties of the right and left. (National parliamentarians are entitled to nominate candidates for the prize. So are professors, past laureates, and various other bigwigs from international organizations.) His nomination of Trump strikes me as preposterous. “Other politicians don’t pick up the phone to talk,” Tybring-Gjedde said. “He has the ability to be down-to-earth and talk to people at all levels.” Tybring-Gjedde notes that Alfred Nobel listed as one of the criteria for the winners that they encourage “peace congresses”—and what is a peace congress but a conversation between people who are not at peace? In my view the deal between the Emirates and Israel is good for the region, but a deal between Israel and the absolute monarchs of a small Gulf state is not a deal between Israel and the people of the Emirates, let alone between Israelis and Palestinians. Trump’s main diplomatic maneuver is to adopt a lickspittle posture toward authoritarians, promising them decades in power in return for a smile and a condo development. Peace does not mean a web of personal agreements between rich psychopaths.
Wood seeks to delegitimize the nomination because he doesn’t like the person doing the nominating, the person being nominated, or the reason for the nomination.
Oops.
(AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)
As we like to say in the world of stand-up comedy, timing is everything.
Wood’s timing was awful here.
He published his diaper-soiling ORANGE MAN BAD screed just hours before it was announced that President Trump had been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for a second time this week, this time by a member of the Swedish Parliament, and for the Serbia/Kosovo agreement he brokered. I wrote about that here yesterday.
Just like that, two of Wood’s “nuke the Nobel” arguments unraveled. He probably spent most of the day curled up in the fetal position with juice boxes strewn all about the place after learning of the second nomination.
The recent descent by The Atlantic into Stage Five ORANGE MAN BAD dementia has been, as one friend of mine who used to be an Atlantic fan said, “Sad.” I agree. The Atlantic was one of the few publications that I could still respect, despite its obvious liberal bent.
The place has turned into BuzzFeed overnight.
When that same friend wondered why The Atlantic had gotten so bad so fast I replied, “The internal polling by the DNC must be awful right now.”
(AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
This has been a very good week for President Trump, as evidenced by desperate hot takes like this one in The Atlantic.
We’re all on the same flight but I think they may be feeling a little more turbulence where they’re sitting.
Editor’s Note: Want to support PJ Media so we can continue telling the truth about the 2020 election? Join PJ Media VIP TODAY and use the promo code LAWANDORDER to get 25% off your VIP membership.
‘The Atlantic’ Barfs Up 2020’s Worst Trump Hit Piece Yet
___
Kruiser Twitter
Kruiser Facebook
PJ Media Senior Columnist and Associate Editor Stephen Kruiser is the author of “Don’t Let the Hippies Shower” and “Straight Outta Feelings: Political Zen in the Age of Outrage,” both of which address serious subjects in a humorous way. Monday through Friday he edits PJ Media’s “Morning Briefing.” His columns appear twice a week.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-12--Sara Carter: 9/11 Changed My Life Forever And Taught Us lessons About Our Nation We Should Never For

Sara Carter: 9/11 Changed My Life Forever And Taught Us lessons About Our Nation We Should Never Forget

I used to wonder when my father told his war stories — discussing the hardships he and friends endured during a time that felt so foreign to me — what it would be like to live in a time when everybody needed one another .
To live in a time when a nation stood united against a common enemy state and people worked together to ensure the safety of their own nation .
My father served in the Marine Corp during WWII and the Korean War .
I would listen to his stories and see the look in his eyes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lost their lives on battlefields so far from home .
On September 11 , however , our enemy wasn ’ t a state actor , like Japan or Germany , but an ideology followed by people who lived in the shadows among us .
September 11 was our war .
It is still our war .
It changed everything for me and ultimately changed the direction and course of my life .
I believe it did that to everyone .
For me the desire to do something about what happened that fateful day @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia .
I was very familiar with Islam , extremism and that region of the world .
I also remember being a little girl playing in the open markets in Jeddah .
I can still remember the spices , the freshly baked pita bread , Falafels frying in pans along the streets , the fish market and the world that seemed so vastly different than the one I came from in America .
I remember the comfort of hearing the call to prayer being sung from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wondering which Imam ’ s voice was being carried by the wind as it mixed with the smells of the mysterious Red Sea .
Those sounds and smells brought me comfort and familiarity that only a child can understand .
So on that morning when the planes first struck the World Trade Center on September 11 , 2001 I was stunned but not completely surprised .
I was living in California at the time and it was extremely early in the morning when I received a call from my mother saying that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Center .
At that point in time we thought it might just be an accident but then when the second plane hit the north tower in my heart I knew that it was terrorist attack and one that would change my life .
By the time the plane hit the Pentagon and then the last of the planes crash in a field in Pennsylvania , most of the world realized that this was a terrorist action that would fundamentally change not only our nation but the way we operate in the world forever @ @ @ @ @ @ @ needed to understand why these mainly Saudi men would follow an ideology and a leader so extreme that they would be willing to sacrifice not only their lives but the lives of innocent people .
Their actions would drag us into seemingly endless wars and lead to the deaths of U.S. service members , civilians and eventually a restructuring of our geopolitical system in the Middle East and South Asia .
I decided to be a journalist .
I went back to school .
I trained .
I went to work covering local @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and eventually became a Pentagon war correspondent .
I traveled to Afghanistan , Iraq and other parts of the world year after year , sometimes twice a year for months documenting stories , interviewing troops and civilians in an attempt to understand what happened on that fateful day .
I covered terrorism , extremism and have spent my life trying to understand this new and dangerous enemy .
In one of the most dangerous regions of Afghanistan I met my future husband , who at that time was fighting the enemy and doing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their lives .
He didn ’ t want the enemy coming back to America – he wanted to fight them on their own turf .
He was part of the roughly one-percent of American volunteers who were willing to go to battle to protect everything that makes our nation the envy of the world .
Then in April , 2011 , in a direct battle with an enemy terrorist in Afghanistan , my husband lost his eyesight .
The enemy , however , lost his life .
I ask him often if he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ yes .
He is my hero and I know his actions have saved many lives .
September 11 , was the beginning of our generations war .
It wasn ’ t my father ’ s war but it was just as significant in the sense that we came to a realization that we have to rely on one-another to protect and keep our nation safe for future generations of Americans .
As I watch what is happening to our nation now it breaks my heart .
We are becoming each others enemies .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Our actions now on the streets of Portland , Seattle , Washington D.C. , Chicago and Kenosha , Wisconsin , just to name a few , don ’ t reflect the greatness of our nation and the goodness that we are capable of .
September 11 , did change everything for me and I know it did for so many others .
I still live with those changes and that day in my heart .
I live not only with the horror of that day but with the incredible patriotism and love @ @ @ @ @ @ @ months and years following that horrific attack .
That ’ s who we are as Americans .
That ’ s where we need to be again .

I used to wonder when my father told his war stories — discussing the hardships he and friends endured during a time that felt so foreign to me — what it would be like to live in a time when everybody needed one another. To live in a time when a nation stood united against a common enemy state and people worked together to ensure the safety of their own nation.
My father served in the Marine Corp during WWII and the Korean War. I would listen to his stories and see the look in his eyes when he remembered friends long gone who lost their lives on battlefields so far from home. On September 11, however, our enemy wasn’t a state actor, like Japan or Germany, but an ideology followed by people who lived in the shadows among us.
September 11 was our war. It is still our war. It changed everything for me and ultimately changed the direction and course of my life. I believe it did that to everyone.
For me the desire to do something about what happened that fateful day was born out of my childhood growing up in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. I was very familiar with Islam, extremism and that region of the world.
I also remember being a little girl playing in the open markets in Jeddah. I can still remember the spices, the freshly baked pita bread, Falafels frying in pans along the streets, the fish market and the world that seemed so vastly different than the one I came from in America. I remember the comfort of hearing the call to prayer being sung from the mosque in the early morning hours and wondering which Imam’s voice was being carried by the wind as it mixed with the smells of the mysterious Red Sea. Those sounds and smells brought me comfort and familiarity that only a child can understand.
So on that morning when the planes first struck the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 I was stunned but not completely surprised. I was living in California at the time and it was extremely early in the morning when I received a call from my mother saying that the first plane had struck the World Trade Center. At that point in time we thought it might just be an accident but then when the second plane hit the north tower in my heart I knew that it was terrorist attack and one that would change my life.
By the time the plane hit the Pentagon and then the last of the planes crash in a field in Pennsylvania, most of the world realized that this was a terrorist action that would fundamentally change not only our nation but the way we operate in the world forever.
I needed to understand. We needed to understand why these mainly Saudi men would follow an ideology and a leader so extreme that they would be willing to sacrifice not only their lives but the lives of innocent people. Their actions would drag us into seemingly endless wars and lead to the deaths of U.S. service members, civilians and eventually a restructuring of our geopolitical system in the Middle East and South Asia.
I decided to be a journalist. I went back to school. I trained. I went to work covering local news, then border and national security and eventually became a Pentagon war correspondent.
I traveled to Afghanistan, Iraq and other parts of the world year after year, sometimes twice a year for months documenting stories, interviewing troops and civilians in an attempt to understand what happened on that fateful day. I covered terrorism, extremism and have spent my life trying to understand this new and dangerous enemy.
In one of the most dangerous regions of Afghanistan I met my future husband, who at that time was fighting the enemy and doing his part to honor those who lost their lives. He didn’t want the enemy coming back to America – he wanted to fight them on their own turf.
He was part of the roughly one-percent of American volunteers who were willing to go to battle to protect everything that makes our nation the envy of the world. Then in April, 2011, in a direct battle with an enemy terrorist in Afghanistan, my husband lost his eyesight. The enemy, however, lost his life.
I ask him often if he would do it again. He says yes. He is my hero and I know his actions have saved many lives.
September 11, was the beginning of our generations war. It wasn’t my father’s war but it was just as significant in the sense that we came to a realization that we have to rely on one-another to protect and keep our nation safe for future generations of Americans.
As I watch what is happening to our nation now it breaks my heart. We are becoming each others enemies. It shouldn’t be this way. Our actions now on the streets of Portland, Seattle, Washington D.C., Chicago and Kenosha, Wisconsin, just to name a few, don’t reflect the greatness of our nation and the goodness that we are capable of.
September 11, did change everything for me and I know it did for so many others. I still live with those changes and that day in my heart.
I live not only with the horror of that day but with the incredible patriotism and love that we showed one-another the weeks, months and years following that horrific attack.
That’s who we are as Americans. That’s where we need to be again.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-12--You Can’t Make This Up: Leftist Book ‘In Defense of Looting’ Warns Readers: ‘Distribution Without Pe

You Can’t Make This Up: Leftist Book ‘In Defense of Looting’ Warns Readers: ‘Distribution Without Permission Is a Theft of Author’s Intellectual Property’

Apparently looting is only fun , free and harmless when you ’ re the one doing it .
Welcome to 2020 , when looting has its own literature .
At the start of the year , few could have predicted widespread riots and looting in the great cities of America — even with a heated election on the horizon .
But the world watched in shock as tensions boiled over in the wake of George Floyd ’ s killing and cities burned .
If we couldn ’ t predict this , much less could we have seen that looting would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But welcome to 2020 .
Vicky Osterweil ’ s In Defence of Looting : A Riotous History of Uncivil Action is the latest book to catch the world ’ s attention — all thanks to National Public Radio ( NPR ) , a taxpayer-funded media group , no less .
Osterweil , a transwoman who describes herself as a writer , editor and agitator , has been fascinated by and involved in protests for many years .
In her new book , she argues that “ looting is a powerful tool to bring @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” .
While it would be easy to dismiss her case out of hand , perhaps it warrants deeper reflection .
As early as the 300s , for example , Church Father Saint Basil of Caesarea taught in a sermon that the poor actually have a rightful claim to the wealth of the rich : Likewise Godfrey of Fontaines ( 1250-1309 ) , a medieval theologian , claimed that if a beggar stole a loaf of bread from his rich neighbour , he couldn ’ t be charged for theft since he had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ order to survive .
In fact , Congresswoman AOC , who loosely defines herself as a Catholic , seemed to echo this logic when she defended the looting in New York City : A Black Lives Matter organiser from Chicago also made this justification when she announced to gathered crowds : “ I don ’ t care if somebody decides to loot a Gucci ’ s or a Macy ’ s or a Nike because that makes sure that that person eats… that ’ s reparations .
Anything they want to take , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Is this what Saint Basil or Godfrey meant ?
Is looting ever morally justifiable ?
Moreover , what exactly does Vicky Osterweil have in mind in her defence of looting ?
“ When I use the word looting , ” explains Osterweil in the NPR interview , “ I mean the mass expropriation of property , mass shoplifting during a moment of upheaval or riot .
That ’ s the thing I ’ m defending.
” She goes on : Referring to looting as “ proletarian shopping ” , Osterweil makes the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of ownership rights and property , the moral injunction to work for a living , and the ‘ justice ’ of law and order ” .
More than this , says Osterweil : “ Looting provides people with an imaginative sense of freedom and pleasure and helps them imagine a world that could be… riots and looting are experienced as sort of joyous and liberatory.
” But what of the damage they cause ?
Says Osterweil : “ In terms of potential crimes that people can commit against the State , it ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mass shoplifting .
Most stores are insured ; it ’ s just hurting insurance companies on some level .
It ’ s just money .
It ’ s just property .
It ’ s not actually hurting any people.
” Unfortunately , that hasn ’ t been true for the countless shop owners in recent months who have lost livelihoods — and even their own lives , in a fight to defend their property .
In one tragic case , a torched corpse was found in a Minneapolis pawnshop days after rioters had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those who have suffered the worst losses are themselves from minority communities .
And the broader community suffers too .
Insurance rates go up , and during the long recovery , local jobs are harder to come by , and groceries and medicines are harder to access .
This is why the mother of Jacob Blake , the African-American shot by police in Kenosha , told the media : “ If Jacob knew what was going on as far as that goes , the violence and destruction , he would be very unpleased @ @ @ @ @ @ @ property and cause havoc and tear your own homes down in my son ’ s name .
You shouldn ’ t do it.
” To Osterweil , looting is fun — for the looters .
It ’ s free — also for the looters .
And it doesn ’ t hurt anyone — at least , not the looters .
But the high costs of it all are borne by everyone else .
In Osterweil ’ s utopian thinking , scarcity simply doesn ’ t exist .
And property rights don ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enough to go around .
This is the eternal flaw in Marxist logic .
Redistribution — by law or by looting — may work in the short-term .
But it kills the will to produce in the first place .
Basil , Godfrey and even I would happily forgive a beggar stealing something they really needed .
But no one wants their livelihood stolen or their community trashed .
And that is precisely what looting leads to .
As a reviewer of the book at The Atlantic asked : “ What do you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — a store that employs six people , or in that same location , a pile of bricks and broken glass ?
” In truth , Osterweil ’ s book undermines her own argument .
Like every book on the market , its publishing declares that “ the scanning , uploading , and distribution of this book without permission is a theft of the author ’ s intellectual property ” .
Apparently looting is only fun , free and harmless when you ’ re the one doing it .

Welcome to 2020, when looting has its own literature.
At the start of the year, few could have predicted widespread riots and looting in the great cities of America — even with a heated election on the horizon. But the world watched in shock as tensions boiled over in the wake of George Floyd’s killing and cities burned.
If we couldn’t predict this, much less could we have seen that looting would end up with its own literature. But welcome to 2020. Vicky Osterweil’s In Defence of Looting: A Riotous History of Uncivil Action is the latest book to catch the world’s attention — all thanks to National Public Radio (NPR), a taxpayer-funded media group, no less.
Osterweil, a transwoman who describes herself as a writer, editor and agitator, has been fascinated by and involved in protests for many years. In her new book, she argues that “looting is a powerful tool to bring about real, lasting change in society”.
While it would be easy to dismiss her case out of hand, perhaps it warrants deeper reflection. As early as the 300s, for example, Church Father Saint Basil of Caesarea taught in a sermon that the poor actually have a rightful claim to the wealth of the rich:
“That bread which you keep belongs to the hungry; that coat which you preserve in your wardrobe, to the naked; those shoes which are rotting in your possession, to the shoeless; that gold which you have hidden in the ground, to the needy.”
Likewise Godfrey of Fontaines (1250-1309), a medieval theologian, claimed that if a beggar stole a loaf of bread from his rich neighbour, he couldn’t be charged for theft since he had a natural right to that bread in order to survive.
In fact, Congresswoman AOC, who loosely defines herself as a Catholic, seemed to echo this logic when she defended the looting in New York City:
“Maybe this has to do with the fact that people aren’t paying their rent and are scared to pay their rent and so they go out and they need to feed their child and they don’t have money so… they feel like they either need to shoplift some bread or go hungry.”
A Black Lives Matter organiser from Chicago also made this justification when she announced to gathered crowds: “I don’t care if somebody decides to loot a Gucci’s or a Macy’s or a Nike because that makes sure that that person eats… that’s reparations. Anything they want to take, take it because these businesses have insurance.”
Advertisement
Is this what Saint Basil or Godfrey meant? Is looting ever morally justifiable? Moreover, what exactly does Vicky Osterweil have in mind in her defence of looting?
“When I use the word looting,” explains Osterweil in the NPR interview, “I mean the mass expropriation of property, mass shoplifting during a moment of upheaval or riot. That’s the thing I’m defending.”
She goes on:
Advertisement
“Often, looting is more common among movements that are coming from below. It tends to be an attack on a business, a commercial space, maybe a government building — taking those things that would otherwise be commodified and controlled and sharing them for free.”
Referring to looting as “proletarian shopping”, Osterweil makes the case that looting “rejects the legitimacy of ownership rights and property, the moral injunction to work for a living, and the ‘justice’ of law and order”. More than this, says Osterweil: “Looting provides people with an imaginative sense of freedom and pleasure and helps them imagine a world that could be… riots and looting are experienced as sort of joyous and liberatory.”
But what of the damage they cause? Says Osterweil: “In terms of potential crimes that people can commit against the State, it’s basically nonviolent. You’re mass shoplifting. Most stores are insured; it’s just hurting insurance companies on some level. It’s just money. It’s just property. It’s not actually hurting any people.”
Unfortunately, that hasn’t been true for the countless shop owners in recent months who have lost livelihoods — and even their own lives, in a fight to defend their property. In one tragic case, a torched corpse was found in a Minneapolis pawnshop days after rioters had passed through.
Ironically, many of those who have suffered the worst losses are themselves from minority communities.
And the broader community suffers too. Insurance rates go up, and during the long recovery, local jobs are harder to come by, and groceries and medicines are harder to access.
This is why the mother of Jacob Blake, the African-American shot by police in Kenosha, told the media: “If Jacob knew what was going on as far as that goes, the violence and destruction, he would be very unpleased. Please don’t burn up property and cause havoc and tear your own homes down in my son’s name. You shouldn’t do it.”
To Osterweil, looting is fun — for the looters. It’s free — also for the looters. And it doesn’t hurt anyone — at least, not the looters.
But the high costs of it all are borne by everyone else.
In Osterweil’s utopian thinking, scarcity simply doesn’t exist. And property rights don’t either, since there will always be enough to go around.
This is the eternal flaw in Marxist logic. Redistribution — by law or by looting — may work in the short-term. But it kills the will to produce in the first place.
Basil, Godfrey and even I would happily forgive a beggar stealing something they really needed. But no one wants their livelihood stolen or their community trashed. And that is precisely what looting leads to.
As a reviewer of the book at The Atlantic asked: “What do you think will do more for your community — a store that employs six people, or in that same location, a pile of bricks and broken glass?”
In truth, Osterweil’s book undermines her own argument. Like every book on the market, its publishing declares that “the scanning, uploading, and distribution of this book without permission is a theft of the author’s intellectual property”.
Apparently looting is only fun, free and harmless when you’re the one doing it.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-13--NBC Fake News Host Peter Alexander Acts as Democrat Party Spokesman in Combative Interview With RNC

NBC Fake News Host Peter Alexander Acts as Democrat Party Spokesman in Combative Interview With RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel

On Saturday morning , Today co-host and weekday White House correspondent Peter Alexander was throwing hardballs at Republican National Committee chair Ronna McDaniel , who gave as good as she got .
Much like their contentious Lara Trump interview last month , NBC is pushing the Trump team around , and Team Biden gets to hide from scrutiny .
These are the Alexander hardballs : 1 .
`` Americans , as you know well , want to know when life is going to get back to normal .
The president said this week that we are rounding the final turn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will be well into 2021 , possibly the end of 2021 before that happens .
So why not just level with the American people ? ''
McDaniel noted Trump 's optimism and Fauci 's estimate of when life will be fully normal are different things , but there is good news , like a dropping number of cases .
2 .
`` Of course , just yesterday , 46,000 new infections were reported , more than a thousand deaths .
The death toll in this country is now approaching 200,000 .
The president @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rally in Nevada today .
For months , he 's urged Americans to follow the state and local guidelines that limit large gatherings , call for social distancing .
So why is he putting his own supporters at risk and flouting those very state and local guidelines ? ''
McDaniel put Alexander in his place by noting that the press does n't fuss about flouted guidelines when protests they like are organized .
Alexander granted this point , but tried to say the president should be different .
Why ?
3 .
`` @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 's new book that made a lot of headlines this week , revealing that the president said one thing privately .
He said that the virus is , quote , more deadly than even your strenuous flus , but said another thing publicly , almost three weeks later , saying that the virus would go away .
And that it was just like the flu .
So should n't the American people expect honesty from the president ? ''
McDaniel listed the `` decisive '' actions the president has taken to fight the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the end as the TV screen read “ THE POLITICS OF FEAR.
” Alexander suggested Trump played down the coronavirus , but he ’ s “ stoking ” fear of urban looting and violence : PETER ALEXANDER : The president said he downplayed the virus because he did n't want to frighten people or cause a panic , but during this pain , he 's repeatedly warned people that agitators and looters were going to overrun their neighborhoods , were going to overrun the suburbs .
If the president is n't , I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those examples is he the one who 's stoking it ?
RONNA McDANIEL : I do n't think he 's stoking it .
I think we 're seeing things on TV -- you look at Kenosha , Wisconsin , it looks like a third world country that got burned out .
It 's really frightening to see businesses being burned down and looted and Democrats failing to protect their cities .
Look at Portland right now .
And I think this is a real unrest that we 're seeing across this country .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ difference of opinion , we can talk about it .
But it 's not okay to go burn down cities and burn down livelihoods and decimate police precincts , which you 've heard some Democrats call for rioters to go do .
This is not okay .
And I think the president is ringing a warning bell that Democrats are not standing up to this type of violence .
Alexander wrapped the interview by inserting a final rebuttal , insisting the murder rate is going up in Republican-run cities , too , like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was brought to you by Volvo .

On Saturday morning, Today co-host and weekday White House correspondent Peter Alexander was throwing hardballs at Republican National Committee chair Ronna McDaniel, who gave as good as she got. Much like their contentious Lara Trump interview last month, NBC is pushing the Trump team around, and Team Biden gets to hide from scrutiny.
These are the Alexander hardballs:
1. "Americans, as you know well, want to know when life is going to get back to normal. The president said this week that we are rounding the final turn, but Dr. Anthony Fauci said it will be well into 2021, possibly the end of 2021 before that happens. So why not just level with the American people?"
McDaniel noted Trump's optimism and Fauci's estimate of when life will be fully normal are different things, but there is good news, like a dropping number of cases.
2. "Of course, just yesterday, 46,000 new infections were reported, more than a thousand deaths. The death toll in this country is now approaching 200,000. The president, as you know, holds another rally in Nevada today. For months, he's urged Americans to follow the state and local guidelines that limit large gatherings, call for social distancing. So why is he putting his own supporters at risk and flouting those very state and local guidelines?"
McDaniel put Alexander in his place by noting that the press doesn't fuss about flouted guidelines when protests they like are organized. Alexander granted this point, but tried to say the president should be different. Why?
3. "Let me ask you about Bob Woodward's new book that made a lot of headlines this week, revealing that the president said one thing privately. He said that the virus is, quote, more deadly than even your strenuous flus, but said another thing publicly, almost three weeks later, saying that the virus would go away. And that it was just like the flu. So shouldn't the American people expect honesty from the president?"
McDaniel listed the "decisive" actions the president has taken to fight the virus.
The hardest hardball came at the end as the TV screen read “THE POLITICS OF FEAR.” Alexander suggested Trump played down the coronavirus, but he’s “stoking” fear of urban looting and violence:
PETER ALEXANDER: The president said he downplayed the virus because he didn't want to frighten people or cause a panic, but during this pain, he's repeatedly warned people that agitators and looters were going to overrun their neighborhoods, were going to overrun the suburbs. If the president isn't, I guess, sparking fear, why in those examples is he the one who's stoking it? RONNA McDANIEL: I don't think he's stoking it. I think we're seeing things on TV -- you look at Kenosha, Wisconsin, it looks like a third world country that got burned out. It's really frightening to see businesses being burned down and looted and Democrats failing to protect their cities. Look at Portland right now. And I think this is a real unrest that we're seeing across this country. You know, if we have a difference of opinion, we can talk about it. But it's not okay to go burn down cities and burn down livelihoods and decimate police precincts, which you've heard some Democrats call for rioters to go do. This is not okay. And I think the president is ringing a warning bell that Democrats are not standing up to this type of violence.
Alexander wrapped the interview by inserting a final rebuttal, insisting the murder rate is going up in Republican-run cities, too, like Tulsa and Miami.
This combative segment was brought to you by Volvo.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-13--After 9/11, Baseball Great Sammy Sosa Hit Home Run, Proudly Ran Around the Diamond Carrying the Amer

After 9/11, Baseball Great Sammy Sosa Hit Home Run, Proudly Ran Around the Diamond Carrying the American Flag — Now We Have Two “National Anthems”

A new petition seeks a Department of Justice ( DOJ ) inquiry into the hangings and drownings of five ...

Last Updated on February 14, 2022
In less than 20 years, American sports events have transformed from patriotic expressions of love for the United States to sports-themed social justice seminars that now play the fictitious “Black National Anthem” and feature Black Lives Matter propaganda while some players refuse to enter the field until the actual National Anthem plays.
In the days immediately following the terrorist attacks on 9/11, the Chicago Cubs’ Sammy Sosa hit a home run during the team’s first home game after the tragedy. Sosa began running the bases, only to have coach Billy Williams intercept him with an American flag. Sosa grabbed the flag, and waved it proudly as he ran the bases.
“Sosa hits it in the basket, and he’s got old glory too,” screamed the announcer. “And how about that hand off from Billy Williams, and he carries Old Glory on the grand tour for home run number 59!”
"…and he's got Old Glory too!" Sammy Sosa, during the @Cubs' first home game after September 11th. pic.twitter.com/ircQNJ0N3a — NBC Sports Chicago (@NBCSChicago) September 11, 2018
20 years later, as the NFL started its season, an entire team left the field until after the National Anthem and Black National Anthem played. This is despite a teenage musical duo singing the anthems while wearing shirts honoring deceased drug enthusiast and suspected fraudster George Floyd.
Meanwhile, The Chiefs stood arm-in-arm throughout both the actual National Anthem and the Black National Anthem, a militant song that instructs the black race to keep fighting until victory is attained.
Fans who disliked the display and expressed their distaste by booing were then mocked by Democrats and those on the political left for daring to express their expectation for a sporting event to focus on athleticism and perhaps include a small amount of patriotism.
Chiefs fans started booing while the Texans and Chiefs locked arms in unity. 🤨 https://t.co/Z0Ua6HlfsU — Complex Sports (@ComplexSports) September 11, 2020
The NBA, meanwhile, returned to the stadiums after COVID-19 only to be greeted by virtual fans and Black Lives Matter propaganda emblazoned onto the basketball courts themselves.
“A big ‘Black Lives Matter’ slogan was also painted on the court, in an effort to show the NBA’s solidarity with the BLM movement,” reported National File. “Despite their radical aims.”
The NBA is officially back! pic.twitter.com/4FYYSQB5Jm — NBA on TNT (@NBAonTNT) July 30, 2020
Meanwhile, Major League Baseball viewership is plummeting as the sports organization’s 2020 season has featured a series of activist stunts. In game, the New York Mets and Miami Marlins players met in the middle of the field, observed a moment of silence for Black Lives Matter, then walked off the field together, leaving a Black Lives Matter shirt behind.
Ironically, the Mets also hold a historic place in post-9/11 history. They were the first sports team to play a game in New York following the terrorist attacks on 9/11.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-13--OOPS! Reflection of Biden’s Teleprompter Shows During Latest Scripted “Interview”

While T.J. Ducklo , Biden ’ s national spokesperson , won ’ t answer the question of whether or not Joe uses a teleprompter , most people know he obviously does .
Slow Joe is out of it .
Last night , Biden held up a photo and you could see the teleprompter in the reflection of the glass in the frame .
Oh , and this was all organic , not a set up at all , I say ironicaly since all the dialogue is written out for him on the teleprompter : And…the entire thing was scripted .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ it straight : He can not speak with world leaders .
Whoever is behind the curtain will run our government if Joe wins .
We don ’ t know who or if it will be a conglomerate of socialists but he/she/or they will be unelected .
Is this really what Democrats are willing to stoop to ?
DUCKLO WOULDN ’ T SAY IF JOE USES A TELEPROMPTER What makes this a particularly great find is oily Ducklo made a bit of a fool of himself with Bret Baier this past week .
At @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which Ducklo wouldn ’ t answer one single question , Ducklo refused to say if Biden uses a teleprompter .
This is the interview if you missed it :

While T.J. Ducklo, Biden’s national spokesperson, won’t answer the question of whether or not Joe uses a teleprompter, most people know he obviously does. Slow Joe is out of it.
Last night, Biden held up a photo and you could see the teleprompter in the reflection of the glass in the frame.
Oh, and this was all organic, not a set up at all, I say ironicaly since all the dialogue is written out for him on the teleprompter:
In addition to the teleprompter, the interview was obviously set up. Biden just happened to have a huge wall sized framed photos by his side to show off. — LibertyFreedomAmericanWay (@love_liberty100) September 12, 2020
While he said “the picture hangs in his bedroom, and is too heavy to lift. How did it magically appear in his desk? — Nancy Pelosi is a Cancer (@BeckyRao15) September 12, 2020
And…the entire thing was scripted. Still, Joe can’t get it straight:
This “Interview” was scripted. Note different colors for teleprompter text. They are two sides to the “conversation”. I’ve worked with TV teleprompters before. This is what they are. pic.twitter.com/OCQj1QTLOZ — Eye of Orwell (@OrwellOf) September 12, 2020
He cannot speak with world leaders. Whoever is behind the curtain will run our government if Joe wins. We don’t know who or if it will be a conglomerate of socialists but he/she/or they will be unelected. Is this really what Democrats are willing to stoop to?
I’m sure Biden can’t even leave his basement and answer questions that Americans have how is he going to answer any questions from world leaders? — AJ🇺🇸 🏳🌈🌈⭐⭐⭐ (@AJCalMaga) September 12, 2020
DUCKLO WOULDN’T SAY IF JOE USES A TELEPROMPTER
What makes this a particularly great find is oily Ducklo made a bit of a fool of himself with Bret Baier this past week. At the end of the crazy interview in which Ducklo wouldn’t answer one single question, Ducklo refused to say if Biden uses a teleprompter.
This is the interview if you missed it:
Related


thelibertydaily--2020-09-13--Why Did at Least 15 Members of The Mueller Team Wipe Their Phones?

The excuses as to why at least 15 members of the Robert Mueller team wiped their phones are at this point unbelievable .
Cell phones were “ inadvertantly ” reverted to factory settings because “ people forgot their passwords.
” And not just one , some of them were wiped twice .
Huh ?
That many people forgot their passwords conveniently just before the phones were requested by the DOJ ?
( Daily Mail ) One person claimed that his phone “ wiped itself without intervention.
” Sure .
‘ It ’ s alive !
’ Other members of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , or that it had “ irreparable screen damage.
” The main cause was the wiping of the information .
Pretty incompetant for professional investigators .
Inspector Clouseau from the Pink Panther was better and he was a fictional comedy character .
It appears that Special Counsel Mueller ’ s team may have deleted federal records that could be key to better understanding their decision-making process as they pursued their investigation and wrote their report , ” Grassley wrote .
“ Indeed , many officials apparently deleted the records after the DOJ Inspector @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Department mishandled Crossfire Hurricane.
” Grassley wrote that “ based on this new information , the number of times and the stated reasons for the deletions calls into question whether or not it was a widespread intentional effort.
” Grassley first raised concerns about the Mueller team ’ s use of text messages in 2017 , after the Justice Department inspector general discovered that texts sent by former FBI agent and member of Mueller ’ s office Peter Strzok were politically charged .
Sen. Ron Johnson , R-Wis. , on Friday also demanded @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ outraged by it.
” “ I ’ m not a lawyer , but I am aware of the concept of anticipatory obstruction of justice , ” Johnson told Fox News in a text message , saying the action of “ accidentally wiping a phone because you entered the wrong password too many times ” makes him “ HIGHLY skeptical , ” and a dozen people making “ the same mistake is COMPLETELY unbelievable.
” Even Strzok ’ s lover , Lisa Page , had her phone “ reverted to factory settings ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ office .
NOW do you understand why OIG Michael Horowitz found “ no evidence ” of intentional bias ?
There is now an open disagreement with Horowitz ’ conclusions as well as the Mueller report itself .
Way to go , Democrats .
If you haven ’ t checked out and liked our Facebook page , please go here and do so .
You can also follow us on Twitter at @ co_firing_line .
Please be sure to check out our MeWe page here and check us out at ProAmerica Only here .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ this , please go here and support us on Patreon and get your conservative pro-Trump gear here .
And while you ’ re at it , be sure to check out our friends at Whatfinger News , the Internet ’ s conservative front-page founded by ex-military !

The excuses as to why at least 15 members of the Robert Mueller team wiped their phones are at this point unbelievable. Cell phones were “inadvertantly” reverted to factory settings because “people forgot their passwords.” And not just one, some of them were wiped twice. Huh? That many people forgot their passwords conveniently just before the phones were requested by the DOJ? (Daily Mail)
.@JudicialWatch first asked for this info. nearly two years ago and sued a year ago. Only now is this chart released to us…. https://t.co/vFV4QH8uuY — Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) September 10, 2020
One person claimed that his phone “wiped itself without intervention.” Sure. ‘It’s alive!’ Other members of the Mueller team claimed they lost their phone, or that it had “irreparable screen damage.” The main cause was the wiping of the information. Pretty incompetant for professional investigators. Inspector Clouseau from the Pink Panther was better and he was a fictional comedy character.
“It’s an amazing coincidence that all these professional investigators kept accidentally wiping their phones. You’d think these people could come up with a more believable excuse for hiding evidence.” Devin Nunes
Understatement.
Fox reported:
It appears that Special Counsel Mueller’s team may have deleted federal records that could be key to better understanding their decision-making process as they pursued their investigation and wrote their report,” Grassley wrote. “Indeed, many officials apparently deleted the records after the DOJ Inspector General began his inquiry into how the Department mishandled Crossfire Hurricane.” Grassley wrote that “based on this new information, the number of times and the stated reasons for the deletions calls into question whether or not it was a widespread intentional effort.” Grassley first raised concerns about the Mueller team’s use of text messages in 2017, after the Justice Department inspector general discovered that texts sent by former FBI agent and member of Mueller’s office Peter Strzok were politically charged. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., on Friday also demanded answers, telling Fox News he was “outraged by it.” “I’m not a lawyer, but I am aware of the concept of anticipatory obstruction of justice,” Johnson told Fox News in a text message, saying the action of “accidentally wiping a phone because you entered the wrong password too many times” makes him “HIGHLY skeptical,” and a dozen people making “the same mistake is COMPLETELY unbelievable.”
Even Strzok’s lover, Lisa Page, had her phone “reverted to factory settings” before she turned it into the OIG office. NOW do you understand why OIG Michael Horowitz found “no evidence” of intentional bias?
There is now an open disagreement with Horowitz’ conclusions as well as the Mueller report itself.
“Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.” John Durham
Way to go, Democrats.
H/T Uncle Sam’s Misguided Children
Related:
If you haven’t checked out and liked our Facebook page, please go here and do so. You can also follow us on Twitter at @co_firing_line. Please be sure to check out our MeWe page here and check us out at ProAmerica Only here.
If you appreciate independent conservative reports like this, please go here and support us on Patreon and get your conservative pro-Trump gear here.
And while you’re at it, be sure to check out our friends at Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative front-page founded by ex-military!


thelibertydaily--2020-09-13--Hollywood Hatemonger Cher Calls Trump A Mass Murderer, Advocates Death Penalty

Scratch a low-information Hollywood leftist , find a bloodthirsty hatemonger .
In a tweet that has since been deleted , the unhinged leftist accused President Trump of being a mass murderer , then suggested he be killed in retaliation .
“ THERE ’ S A BLAME 4 KILLING SOMEONE…ITS CALLED ‘ MURDER ’ .
IF YOU MURDER MORE THAN ONE PERSON YOU ARE A MASS MURDERER .
THERE ARE MANY PUNISHMENTS FOR DIFFERENT DEGREES OF MURDER , BUT WHEN SOMEONE ‘ KNOWINGLY ‘ MURDERS PEOPLE… THE PUNISHMENT IS DEATH .
Trump ’ s a mass murderer… hhmm , ” she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deleted the tweet , she continued her rant in another thread , asking , “ why did Trump lie ” and admitting that she sometimes goes “ too far.
” She then provided a screenshot of articles on the Treasury Department reportedly siphoning millions from a 9/11 program .
However , she said she would not “ fall below my moral compass , ” despite publicly suggesting that Trump be put to death .
This isn ’ t the first time the ignorant Hollywood fanatic has accused Trump of murder , the report @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump of murder , but said he should be put in solitary confinement .
And she doubled down in August : And in May 2019 , she called for Trump to be raped in prison .
In all seriousness , the only thing Cher is proving is that liberalism , at its core , is not only a mental disorder , it ’ s an ideology of insane , bloodthirsty rage and hate .
Perhaps she should seek professional help… • Unhinged Trump-hater Cher calls for Trump to be RAPED in prison • @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cruz is ‘ SATAN INCARNATE , ’ a ‘ Judas ’ to America , Hitler and a ‘ deviant ’ • ‘ We are coming for you with knives ’ : Man charged after threatening to kill Trump If you haven ’ t checked out and liked our Facebook page , please go here and do so .
You can also follow us on Twitter at @ co_firing_line .
Facebook , Google and other members of the Silicon Valley Axis of Evil are now doing everything they can to deliberately stifle conservative content @ @ @ @ @ @ @ check out our MeWe page here , and check us out at ProAmerica Only .
If you appreciate independent conservative reports like this , please go here and support us on Patreon and get your conservative pro-Trump gear here .
While you ’ re at it , be sure to check out our friends at Whatfinger News , the Internet ’ s conservative front-page founded by ex-military !
And be sure to check out our friends at Trending Views :

Scratch a low-information Hollywood leftist, find a bloodthirsty hatemonger. In a tweet that has since been deleted, the unhinged leftist accused President Trump of being a mass murderer, then suggested he be killed in retaliation.
“THERE’S A BLAME 4 KILLING SOMEONE…ITS CALLED ‘MURDER’. IF YOU MURDER MORE THAN ONE PERSON YOU ARE A MASS MURDERER. THERE ARE MANY PUNISHMENTS FOR DIFFERENT DEGREES OF MURDER,BUT WHEN SOMEONE ‘KNOWINGLY ‘MURDERS PEOPLE… THE PUNISHMENT IS DEATH. Trump’s a mass murderer… hhmm,” she wrote, Breitbart reported.
Breitbart posted a screenshot of the deleted tweet:
Breitbart added:
While Cher deleted the tweet, she continued her rant in another thread, asking, “why did Trump lie” and admitting that she sometimes goes “too far.” She then provided a screenshot of articles on the Treasury Department reportedly siphoning millions from a 9/11 program. However, she said she would not “fall below my moral compass,” despite publicly suggesting that Trump be put to death.
This isn’t the first time the ignorant Hollywood fanatic has accused Trump of murder, the report said. In July, she accused Trump of murder, but said he should be put in solitary confinement.
trump Cares Nothing About Our Vets,Our Country,Ppl Who Are Dying of Covid,Ppl From Black Lives Matter,Kids He Keeps?In Cages,Nurses,& Drs Who Are Dying Because He Wont Protect Them,HE KILLS AMERICANS WITHOUT A THOUGHT,HE KILLS 4 ADULATION AT RALLIES☠ https://t.co/ICvqOG5fBE — Cher (@cher) July 11, 2020
trump Needs To Be In Solitary
Confinement 4 The Rest O His Life, — Cher (@cher) July 12, 2020
And she doubled down in August:
Believe There’s Chance trump’ll Come Up With?+Benefits He Promised??Ppl.(He’s Trying 2 Save MAMMOTH ASS).He Sold His Soul 2 ☠&PUTIN 4 First Term,BUT After Torture & Killing 160 Thousand??’s WITH NO?, WE KNOW HE’S SCUM & DOES’T CARE.WITH?HE CAN LIE HIMSELF IN2 BEING HERO — Cher (@cher) August 8, 2020
And in May 2019, she called for Trump to be raped in prison.
In all seriousness, the only thing Cher is proving is that liberalism, at its core, is not only a mental disorder, it’s an ideology of insane, bloodthirsty rage and hate. Perhaps she should seek professional help…
Related:
If you haven’t checked out and liked our Facebook page, please go here and do so. You can also follow us on Twitter at @co_firing_line. Facebook, Google and other members of the Silicon Valley Axis of Evil are now doing everything they can to deliberately stifle conservative content online, so please be sure to check out our MeWe page here, and check us out at ProAmerica Only.
If you appreciate independent conservative reports like this, please go here and support us on Patreon and get your conservative pro-Trump gear here.
While you’re at it, be sure to check out our friends at Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative front-page founded by ex-military! And be sure to check out our friends at Trending Views: