thelibertydaily--2020-09-25--Irrefutable Evidence Nazi Collaborator George Soros is Funding the Violent Democrat Riots

For some time now , there have been questions about who is keeping these riots going .
That 's to say , where is the money , food , shelter , equipment , etc .
coming from in order that these fools can be on the streets every night ?
One of the frequently tossed around theories is that George Soros is the man who is fueling the fire ( pun intended ) .
However , we now have undeniable proof with a paper trail that Soros is indeed paying for these riots and supplying these terrorists with shields , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
There was a U-Haul truck that was spotted full of riot supplies in Louisville leading up to the riots following the announcement from the Grand Jury regarding the death of Breonna Taylor .
There is even a video showing this .
So where did that truck come from ?
Where did that gear come from ?
Well , the truck was rented by Holly Zoller , who is part of the Louisville Bail Initiative that helps bail out all of these criminals that are rioting .
She is the person who rented @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one who drove the truck to the location .
We know that at LEAST two people on the board of the Louisville Bail Initiative were Soros Justice Fellows .
Here is the rental contract that she agreed to with for the U-Haul truck : And the worst of all is the phone call that has her admitting that she drove the truck to the site to unload the goods : If you ask me , there is no longer any real credible claim that George Soros is n't behind these riots .
I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the evidence pointing toward Soros , combined with everything else that we 've seen in the past already unequivocally proves that he is behind this violence .
I guarantee that if Biden wins the election , these riots would stop almost instantly .

BOMBSHELL! Irrefutable Evidence George Soros is Funding the Riots...This Will Blow Your Mind (VIDEO)
BOMBSHELL! Irrefutable Evidence George Soros is Funding the Riots...This Will Blow Your Mind (VIDEO)
For some time now, there have been questions about who is keeping these riots going. That's to say, where is the money, food, shelter, equipment, etc. coming from in order that these fools can be on the streets every night?
One of the frequently tossed around theories is that George Soros is the man who is fueling the fire (pun intended).
However, we now have undeniable proof with a paper trail that Soros is indeed paying for these riots and supplying these terrorists with shields, signs, gas masks, and weapons.
There was a U-Haul truck that was spotted full of riot supplies in Louisville leading up to the riots following the announcement from the Grand Jury regarding the death of Breonna Taylor.
There is even a video showing this.
Anarchists pulling Antifa signs and shields out of a pre-parked UHaul truck in Louisville pic.twitter.com/Bm2g800mTI — Jack Posobiec ✝ (@JackPosobiec) September 23, 2020
So where did that truck come from? Where did that gear come from?
Well, the truck was rented by Holly Zoller, who is part of the Louisville Bail Initiative that helps bail out all of these criminals that are rioting.
Here's the proof:
She is the person who rented the truck, as well as the one who drove the truck to the location.
We know that at LEAST two people on the board of the Louisville Bail Initiative were Soros Justice Fellows.
Here is the rental contract that she agreed to with for the U-Haul truck:
And the worst of all is the phone call that has her admitting that she drove the truck to the site to unload the goods:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wuw7xJ_7fPA
https://twitter.com/inteldotwav/status/1308872299110637568?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1308872299110637568%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2020%2F09%2Fu-haul-seen-distributing-shields-weapons-louisville-rioters-rented-holly-zoller-louisville-bail-project%2F
If you ask me, there is no longer any real credible claim that George Soros isn't behind these riots. I think this U-Haul incident along with all of the evidence pointing toward Soros, combined with everything else that we've seen in the past already unequivocally proves that he is behind this violence.
I guarantee that if Biden wins the election, these riots would stop almost instantly.
Trending Political News
WATCH: Kayleigh McEnany Says She Can Confirms Ballots for Trump Were 'Cast Aside' in Pennsylvania
The mail-in voting process is being pushed hard by the left. This is despite the many claims of voter fraud across the country.
On Thursday, speaking at a White House press briefing, White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany said she could confirm that ballots for President Trump were found “cast aside” in Pennsylvania.
Continue reading…
Gov. DeSantis Bill: No Liability for Drivers Who Run Over 'Mob' Blocking Road
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis is setting the bar high, and I hope the rest of the country follows suit.
DeSantis introduced a bill that will not only declare it a third-degree felony to obstruct traffic during an “unpermitted protest, demonstration or violent or disorderly assembly," but also remove liability for drivers who run over the mob while "fleeing for safety."
Continue reading…
Dr. Ben Carson: ‘Race Is Being Manipulated' to ‘Divide’ Americans
On Thursday, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Dr. Ben Carson declared that race is being manipulated in our country in order to create chaos and divide among Americans.
While interring with Family Research Council Action President Tony Perkins, Carson recalled his childhood as a black boy in Detroit during the 1950s and 1960s. He said that the race issues he "would curl your hair.”
Continue reading…
Dems Set to Introduce Bill Limiting Supreme Court Terms to 18 Years
House Democrats are set to introduce new legislation next week that will limit Supreme Court justice terms to 18 years, whereas the current term is a lifetime appointment.
According to Reuters, the bill “would allow every president to nominate two justices per four-year term.”
Continue reading...
Basement Biden Convinced "This" Will Happen If Trump is Re-elected
Last week, Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden made one of the most ridiculous claims that he's ever made...and you know as well as I do that he's made a lot.
Biden said that all of these natural disasters that we experience every year; the wildfires, the hurricanes, tornadoes, etc. would all be worsened by President Trump winning the election.
Continue reading…
College University Admits to Their Racism - Trump Administration Immediately Takes Action
Liberals may want to accuse President Trump of being a racist, but everything that he has done exhibits the exact opposite behavior.
Just this month he signed an order to get rid of the racist teaching of critical race theory. Now the Trump administration is probing Princeton University after admitting to racism, yet continuing in it.
Continue reading…


thelibertydaily--2020-09-25--REAL “COLLUSION”: Dirty Obama Deep State Coup Plotter Andrew McCabe at Center of Durham’s Probe as N

REAL “COLLUSION”: Dirty Obama Deep State Coup Plotter Andrew McCabe at Center of Durham’s Probe as New Info Reveals Source Was a Russian Agent

Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Lindsey Graham hinted more than a week ago that more bombshell information regarding the FBI ’ s handling of its probe into President Donald Trump ’ s campaign and Russia was about to be public .
He was right because it was Graham ’ s committee that discovered the information .
In a bombshell letter released a letter Thursday night by Graham ’ s committee from Justice Department Attorney General William Barr revealed a declassified summary from the bureau indicating that former British spy Christopher Steele ’ s primary sub-source in his debunked dossier @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Not only was the sub source believed to be a spy but the FBI knew about it and had conducted a counterintelligence investigation on the individual .
“ In light of this newly declassified information , I will be sending the FISA Court the information provided to inform them how wide and deep the effort to conceal exculpatory information regarding the Carter Page warrant application was in 2016 and 2017 , ” said Graham .
“ A small group of individuals in the Department of Justice and FBI should be held accountable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I do not believe they represent the overwhelming majority of patriotic men and women who work at the Department of Justice and FBI.
” One of those individuals being investigated by Connecticut Prosecutor John Durham is former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe , who was fired from the FBI by former Attorney General Jeff Sessions for lying to the Inspector General on multiple occasions .
He is now in Durham ’ s crosshairs , along with multiple other former senior FBI officials that were involved in the investigation , according to a source @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with other FBI officials , withheld that information from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court , as well as some of the FBI special agents investigating Trump ’ s campaign and its alleged ties to Russia , according to the source .
“ McCabe and others were suppressing information , misrepresenting it or lying about the information that they had in order to purposefully undermine the Trump candidacy and that turned into the predication for undermining the Trump presidency , ” said a source with direct knowledge of the situation .
The source , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the senior brass at the FBI , told this reporter the FBI Director Christopher Wray , along with Deputy Director David Bowdich , were contacted last week by the DOJ and were warned that a “ shit storm was heading their way.
” The source alleged that McCabe is now a central figure in Durham ’ s investigation , along with several other senior FBI officials who were aware of the information but failed to disclose it .
McCabe could not be immediately reached for comment but this story will be updated if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ FBI press office , nor Thomas Carson , a spokesman for Durham ’ s office commented for this story despite repeated requests .
The explosive information shed even more light on the internal corruption inside the bureau at the highest levels and the purposeful misuse of the agency to target a political presidential opponent .
In fact , it raises serious concerns that these actions were not an aberration but could have been occurring for sometime inside the FBI and intelligence community , several U.S. intelligence officials and former FBI officials told this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the pale and what ’ s worse no one has paid the price for attempting to oust – coup – a U.S. president , ” said one former senior intelligence official .
“ What makes it worse is politicians who are using this information for political purposes – they do so at the detriment of the American system and republic.
” Graham ( R-South Carolina ) released the letter , along wit a declassified summary from the Federal Bureau of Investigation ( FBI ) revealing the bureau ’ s investigation .
It just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ release by Graham that the information was revealed during a “ request for oversight of the reliability of the Steele dossier , ” which led the Justice Department to recently declassify a key footnote in Inspector General Michael Horowitz ’ s report .
“ The footnote states Christopher Steele ’ s Primary Sub-source “ was the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation from 2009 to 2011 that assessed his/her documented contacts with suspected Russian intelligence officers , ” stated the letter .
Graham stated in his press release that the “ failure of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Primary Sub-source was suspected of being a Russian agent is a breach of every duty owed by law enforcement to the judicial system.
” In fact , the FBI summary provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee revealed that the FBI ’ s Crossfire Hurricane team was aware of this information in December 2016 .
Meaning former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok , and FBI attorney Lisa Page , were aware of the information and failed to inform the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court .
Further , they continued to seek three FISA warrant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ basis and knowing that the information was more than likely Russian disinformation .
“ The now famous email Susan Rice sent to herself on Inauguration Day where she states that President Obama said that everything has to be done ‘ by the book ’ has become highly suspect , ” said Graham .
“ If this investigation is ‘ by the book , ’ then the book we ’ re using is the Kremlin playbook .
• Graham ’ s letter revealed that “ a review of FBI databases revealed that the Primary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Russian Embassy and known Russian intelligence officers.
” • “ In September 2006 , the Primary Sub-source was in contact with a known Russian intelligence officer .
During these conversations , the Russian Intelligence Officer invited the Primary Sub-source to the Russian Embassy to see his office .
• The Primary Sub-source told the Russian Intelligence Officer that he/she was interested in entering the Russian diplomatic service one day .
The two discussed a time when the Primary Sub-source was to visit .
Four days later , the Russian Intelligence Officer contacted the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ meet that day to work “ on the documents and then think about future plans.
” • Later in October 2006 , the Primary Sub-source contacted the Russian Intelligence Officer seeking a reply “ so the documents can be placed in tomorrow ’ s diplomatic mail pouch.
” • FBI information further identified , in 2005 , the Primary Sub-source making contact with a Washington , D.C.–based Russian officer .
It was noted that the Russian officer and the Primary Sub-source seemed very familiar with each other.
” • “ As part of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the Primary Sub-source ’ s associates .
One individual indicated that the Primary Sub-source was not anti-American but wanted to return to Russia one day .
Another described the Primary Sub-source as pro-Russia and indicated that he/she always interjected Russian opinions during policy discussions .
While both stated that they did not recall the Primary Sub-source asking directly about their access to classified information , one interviewee did note that the Primary Sub-source persistently asked about the interviewee ’ s knowledge of a particular military vessel.
” From Graham ’ s Press @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s declassified summary : • The Crossfire Hurricane team knew in December 2016 that Christopher Steele ’ s Primary Sub-source was an individual who the FBI had indicated in 2009 “ could be a threat to national security.
” • In May 2009 , Steele ’ s source reportedly attempted to recruit two individuals connected to an influential foreign policy advisor connected to President Obama , offering that if the two individuals “ ‘ did get a job in the government and had access to classified information ’ and wanted ‘ to make @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Steele ’ s source ] knew some people to whom they could speak .
” • FBI databases revealed Steele ’ s source “ had contact in 2006 with the Russian Embassy and known Russian intelligence officers , [ including contacting a known Russian intelligence officer ] ‘ so the documents can be placed in tomorrow ’ s diplomatic pouch.
’ ” • One individual interviewed by the FBI noted that “ the Primary Sub-source persistently asked about the interviewee ’ s knowledge of a particular military vessel.
” • Significantly , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ investigation [ of the Primary Sub-source ] stated that consideration would be given to re-opening the investigation in the event that the Primary Sub-source returned to the United States.
” • First , the primary source for the Steele dossier was likely a Russian agent .
• Second , the Primary Sub-source was suspected by the FBI in 2009 of being a Russian agent , and there had been an active counterintelligence investigation of this individual .
That FBI investigation revealed the Primary Sub-source was suspected of providing information to the Russian Embassy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intelligence officers , and made offers to people connected to incoming Obama Administration officials that any classified information they provided could be paid for .
In addition , during this investigation it was disclosed that the Primary Sub-source persistently asked individuals about a particular military vessel of the United States .
• Third , the information provided shows that in December 2016 , the FBI knew of the previous counterintelligence investigation of the Primary Sub-source and the source ’ s ties to Russian intelligence services .
However , they failed to inform the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only did they not inform the FISA Court the Primary Sub-source was likely a Russian agent , they continued to use the Steele dossier to seek warrants against Carter Page .
They told the court the Primary Sub-source was truthful and cooperative .
Specifically the three FISA applications filed after December 2016 make no mention of the previous counterintelligence investigation against the Primary Sub-source and the last two FISA applications additionally misled the court about the results obtained of the interviews of the Primary Sub-source in January and March of 2017 .
AG @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on Scribd

Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Lindsey Graham hinted more than a week ago that more bombshell information regarding the FBI’s handling of its probe into President Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia was about to be public. He was right because it was Graham’s committee that discovered the information.
In a bombshell letter released a letter Thursday night by Graham’s committee from Justice Department Attorney General William Barr revealed a declassified summary from the bureau indicating that former British spy Christopher Steele’s primary sub-source in his debunked dossier was believed to be a Russian spy. Not only was the sub source believed to be a spy but the FBI knew about it and had conducted a counterintelligence investigation on the individual.
“In light of this newly declassified information, I will be sending the FISA Court the information provided to inform them how wide and deep the effort to conceal exculpatory information regarding the Carter Page warrant application was in 2016 and 2017,” said Graham. “A small group of individuals in the Department of Justice and FBI should be held accountable for this fraud against the court. I do not believe they represent the overwhelming majority of patriotic men and women who work at the Department of Justice and FBI.”
One of those individuals being investigated by Connecticut Prosecutor John Durham is former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who was fired from the FBI by former Attorney General Jeff Sessions for lying to the Inspector General on multiple occasions. He is now in Durham’s crosshairs, along with multiple other former senior FBI officials that were involved in the investigation, according to a source with direct knowledge.
“McCabe and others were suppressing information, misrepresenting it or lying about the information that they had in order to purposefully undermine the Trump candidacy and that turned into the predication for undermining the Trump presidency”
McCabe, along with other FBI officials, withheld that information from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, as well as some of the FBI special agents investigating Trump’s campaign and its alleged ties to Russia, according to the source.
“McCabe and others were suppressing information, misrepresenting it or lying about the information that they had in order to purposefully undermine the Trump candidacy and that turned into the predication for undermining the Trump presidency,” said a source with direct knowledge of the situation.
The source, who is familiar with the ongoings of the senior brass at the FBI, told this reporter the FBI Director Christopher Wray, along with Deputy Director David Bowdich, were contacted last week by the DOJ and were warned that a “shit storm was heading their way.”
The source alleged that McCabe is now a central figure in Durham’s investigation, along with several other senior FBI officials who were aware of the information but failed to disclose it. McCabe could not be immediately reached for comment but this story will be updated if and when he responds.
Neither the FBI press office, nor Thomas Carson, a spokesman for Durham’s office commented for this story despite repeated requests.
The explosive information shed even more light on the internal corruption inside the bureau at the highest levels and the purposeful misuse of the agency to target a political presidential opponent. In fact, it raises serious concerns that these actions were not an aberration but could have been occurring for sometime inside the FBI and intelligence community, several U.S. intelligence officials and former FBI officials told this columnist.
“It’s beyond the pale and what’s worse no one has paid the price for attempting to oust – coup – a U.S. president,” said one former senior intelligence official. “What makes it worse is politicians who are using this information for political purposes – they do so at the detriment of the American system and republic.”
Graham (R-South Carolina) released the letter, along wit a declassified summary from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) revealing the bureau’s investigation.
It just so happened, according to a press release by Graham that the information was revealed during a “request for oversight of the reliability of the Steele dossier,” which led the Justice Department to recently declassify a key footnote in Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report.
“The footnote states Christopher Steele’s Primary Sub-source “was the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation from 2009 to 2011 that assessed his/her documented contacts with suspected Russian intelligence officers,” stated the letter.
Graham stated in his press release that the “failure of the FBI to inform the court that the Primary Sub-source was suspected of being a Russian agent is a breach of every duty owed by law enforcement to the judicial system.”
In fact, the FBI summary provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee revealed that the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane team was aware of this information in December 2016. Meaning former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok, and FBI attorney Lisa Page, were aware of the information and failed to inform the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
Further, they continued to seek three FISA warrant applications using the Steele dossier as a basis and knowing that the information was more than likely Russian disinformation.
“The now famous email Susan Rice sent to herself on Inauguration Day where she states that President Obama said that everything has to be done ‘by the book’ has become highly suspect,” said Graham. “If this investigation is ‘by the book,’ then the book we’re using is the Kremlin playbook.
The Sub-Source and Primary Sub-Source
Graham’s letter revealed that “a review of FBI databases revealed that the Primary Sub-source had contact in 2006 with the Russian Embassy and known Russian intelligence officers.”
“In September 2006, the Primary Sub-source was in contact with a known Russian intelligence officer. During these conversations, the Russian Intelligence Officer invited the Primary Sub-source to the Russian Embassy to see his office.
The Primary Sub-source told the Russian Intelligence Officer that he/she was interested in entering the Russian diplomatic service one day. The two discussed a time when the Primary Sub-source was to visit. Four days later, the Russian Intelligence Officer contacted the Primary Sub-source and informed him/her they could meet that day to work “on the documents and then think about future plans.”
Later in October 2006, the Primary Sub-source contacted the Russian Intelligence Officer seeking a reply “so the documents can be placed in tomorrow’s diplomatic mail pouch.”
FBI information further identified, in 2005, the Primary Sub-source making contact with a Washington, D.C.–based Russian officer. It was noted that the Russian officer and the Primary Sub-source seemed very familiar with each other.”
“As part of its investigation, the FBI conducted interviews with the Primary Sub-source’s associates. One individual indicated that the Primary Sub-source was not anti-American but wanted to return to Russia one day. Another described the Primary Sub-source as pro-Russia and indicated that he/she always interjected Russian opinions during policy discussions. While both stated that they did not recall the Primary Sub-source asking directly about their access to classified information, one interviewee did note that the Primary Sub-source persistently asked about the interviewee’s knowledge of a particular military vessel.”
From Graham’s Press Release/ Key takeaways from the FBI’s declassified summary:
The Crossfire Hurricane team knew in December 2016 that Christopher Steele’s Primary Sub-source was an individual who the FBI had indicated in 2009 “could be a threat to national security.”
In May 2009, Steele’s source reportedly attempted to recruit two individuals connected to an influential foreign policy advisor connected to President Obama, offering that if the two individuals “‘did get a job in the government and had access to classified information’ and wanted ‘to make a little extra money,’ [Steele’s source] knew some people to whom they could speak .”
.” FBI databases revealed Steele’s source “had contact in 2006 with the Russian Embassy and known Russian intelligence officers, [including contacting a known Russian intelligence officer] ‘so the documents can be placed in tomorrow’s diplomatic pouch.’”
‘so the documents can be placed in tomorrow’s diplomatic pouch.’” One individual interviewed by the FBI noted that “the Primary Sub-source persistently asked about the interviewee’s knowledge of a particular military vessel.”
Significantly, the “record documenting the closing of the investigation [of the Primary Sub-source] stated that consideration would be given to re-opening the investigation in the event that the Primary Sub-source returned to the United States.”
Key Findings:
First, the primary source for the Steele dossier was likely a Russian agent.
Second, the Primary Sub-source was suspected by the FBI in 2009 of being a Russian agent, and there had been an active counterintelligence investigation of this individual. That FBI investigation revealed the Primary Sub-source was suspected of providing information to the Russian Embassy and was in contact with known Russian intelligence officers, and made offers to people connected to incoming Obama Administration officials that any classified information they provided could be paid for. In addition, during this investigation it was disclosed that the Primary Sub-source persistently asked individuals about a particular military vessel of the United States.
Third, the information provided shows that in December 2016, the FBI knew of the previous counterintelligence investigation of the Primary Sub-source and the source’s ties to Russian intelligence services. However, they failed to inform the FISA Court. In fact, not only did they not inform the FISA Court the Primary Sub-source was likely a Russian agent, they continued to use the Steele dossier to seek warrants against Carter Page. They told the court the Primary Sub-source was truthful and cooperative. Specifically the three FISA applications filed after December 2016 make no mention of the previous counterintelligence investigation against the Primary Sub-source and the last two FISA applications additionally misled the court about the results obtained of the interviews of the Primary Sub-source in January and March of 2017.
AG Letter to Chairman Graham 9.24.2020 by Sara on Scribd


thelibertydaily--2020-09-25--Biden Report Shows Phony Impeachment Was Election Interference

What if all the damning information in Ron Johnson ’ s report was revealed in September 2019 and not in September 2020 ?
With the release Wednesday of Senator Ron Johnson ’ s ( R-Wis. ) long-awaited investigation into the Biden family ’ s corrupt , possibly criminal , ties to Ukraine and other countries , one thing is clear : Had the information in the report been made public a year ago , it ’ s nearly impossible to believe Joe Biden would still be the Democratic nominee for president .
The fall of 2019 seems like a lifetime @ @ @ @ @ @ @ revisiting to give context to this bombshell report .
As the Democratic race for president took shape last year , the media started asking uncomfortable questions .
“ Will Hunter Biden Jeopardize His Father ’ s Campaign ?
” read the headline of a nearly 11,000-word exposé in the July 2019 issue of The New Yorker .
Other news organizations followed suit .
Senate Republicans finally were zoning in on the shady business dealings of their former colleague ’ s son .
As damaging , potential campaign-ending coverage continued for months , Team @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for spreading “ disinformation ” about Hunter Biden .
In October 2019 , Biden , in a clip recirculated this week , lashed out at reporters for asking about Hunter Biden ’ s multimillion dollar overseas contracts .
Even his Democratic opponents were piling on .
Things were going downhill for the one candidate most establishment Democrats thought had the best chance to beat Donald Trump in 2020 .
Well , you know the rest of the story .
House Democrats successfully changed the subject by manufacturing an impeachment case against President Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ whistleblower ” connected to Biden .
The country , once again , was thrown into political chaos .
The Democrats ’ gambit worked .
They knew Trump would not be convicted by a Republican Senate , but Hunter Biden ’ s name quickly vanished from the headlines .
America ’ s complicit news media cowered to the mob-like threats of Team Biden and have since kept their mouths shut .
Hunter Biden , unscathed , even made a cameo appearance at the virtual Democratic National Convention .
Trump ’ s impeachment served @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scandal under the self-proclaimed “ scandal free ” Obama Administration and to save Joe Biden ’ s candidacy .
It was straight-up interference with the 2020 election because without the impeachment diversions , it ’ s very likely that either Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren , not Biden , would be on the November ballot right now .
The joint report released this week from the Homeland Security Committee and Senate Finance Committee reads like a Hollywood screenplay .
Hunter Biden is the Beltway ’ s version of Jordan Belfort , the “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but without the hard-knock start and all the hard work .
The youngest Biden is a well-known womanizer ( including sleeping with his late brother ’ s widow ) with a history of drug abuse and bad decisions .
With Secret Service protection and access to Air Force Two , Hunter swaggered around the globe during the Obama-Biden presidency , including six trips to China .
A few months after the Navy discharged him for cocaine use , Hunter Biden was hired in May 2014 by Burisma , Ukraine ’ s largest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who was under investigation in the United States and UK for money laundering among other crimes .
“ [ O ] ver the course of the next several years , Hunter Biden and [ business partner ] Devon Archer were paid millions of dollars from a corrupt Ukrainian oligarch for their participation on the board , ” according to Johnson ’ s 87-page report .
“ In addition to the over $ 4 million paid by Burisma for Hunter Biden ’ s and Archer ’ s board memberships , Hunter Biden , his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from foreign nationals with questionable backgrounds .
The Treasury records .
.
.
show potential criminal activity relating to transactions among and between Hunter Biden , his family , and his associates with Ukrainian , Russian , Kazakh and Chinese nationals.
” Further , what jumps out in the report is that one of impeachment ’ s star witnesses , instead of informing the American people about the scandal when given the chance , helped turn the focus on the president .
George Kent , the bow-tied deputy assistant secretary of state , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ last fall as part of Rep. Adam Schiff ’ s ( D-Calif. ) impeachment inquiry .
The longtime diplomat became a media darling for his role in bolstering the Democrats ’ case against the president .
During the committee ’ s open hearing , Kent danced around questions about Burisma ’ s corruption .
“ Its business reputation is mixed , ” Kent cautiously told Republican counsel on November 13 , 2019 .
Kent repeatedly tried to avoid directly condemning Hunter Biden ’ s appointment to Burisma ’ s board .
“ I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a variety of reasons , ” Kent insisted .
Kent told the committee he notified the vice president ’ s staff in early 2015 that Hunter Biden ’ s status as a board member “ could create the possibility of a perception of conflict of interest.
” But his July 2020 closed-door testimony was more forthcoming .
Kent elaborated on what he told the vice president ’ s office .
The then-deputy chief at the U.S. embassy in Kyiv , Kent contacted the vice president ’ s office with an unvarnished plea .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Hunter Biden , and he should [ step ] down from the board of Burisma , ” Kent told the committees .
He admitted that he “ never heard back from the vice president ’ s office.
” When that request went nowhere , a year later , Kent emailed senior State Department officials .
“ The presence of Hunter Biden on the Burisma board was very awkward for all U.S. officials pushing an anti-corruption agenda in Ukraine , ” he wrote in a September 2016 email .
Kent ’ s concerns @ @ @ @ @ @ @ remained unaddressed.
” Other emails obtained by the committees show Kent ’ s view of Burisma ’ s reputation was far from “ mixed , ” as Kent said publicly .
“ Zlochevsky was viewed as corrupt , not just in Ukraine but by the USG , ” he wrote in the September 2016 email to John Kerry ’ s State Department .
( Kerry ’ s stepson was a longtime business partner of Hunter . )
Burisma ’ s owner was a “ poster child for corrupt behavior , ” he told @ @ @ @ @ @ @ projects with Burisma posed a “ moral hazard , ” Kent said in another August 2016 email .
That ’ s quite a contrast to the vague assessment Kent gave the American people last November .
In his November 2019 public testimony , Kent said there was a “ strong assumption ” that Zlochevsky bribed Ukraine ’ s prosecutor general in late 2014 to drop the case against Burisma .
( Hunter Biden was on the board by then . )
“ We thought Zlochevsky had stolen money , we thought a prosecutor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ case and those were our main concerns.
” But he told Republicans a slightly different story .
Kent confronted the Ukrainian prosecutor ’ s office about the bribe in early 2015 and demanded to know “ who had paid the bribe and how much it was .
I also demanded that the case against Zlochevsky be resumed.
” The $ 7 million bribe was referred to the FBI by a Justice Department official .
“ At this time , the committees are seeking an explanation from the FBI about what , if any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ information from the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv.
” Imagine if Kent had given the same sort of testimony to the American people 10 months ago .
What if he had confirmed Burisma ’ s corruption , the details of the bribery scheme , and the referral to James Comey ’ s FBI ?
What if he had told Congress that his pleas were ignored by the vice president ’ s office and the State Department despite repeated attempts ?
That the son of the leading Democratic candidate for president was profiting from a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Administration officials turned a blind eye at the time ?
What if all the damning information in Johnson ’ s report was revealed in September 2019 and not in September 2020 ?
The media would have been forced to report it .
Impeachment would have been exposed as the diversion that it was .
Joe Biden would not have been permitted to continue avoiding all the questions he ’ s successfully avoided since impeachment .
Hunter Biden might be facing serious charges .
And it ’ s very possible someone else would be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

With the release Wednesday of Senator Ron Johnson’s (R-Wis.) long-awaited investigation into the Biden family’s corrupt, possibly criminal, ties to Ukraine and other countries, one thing is clear: Had the information in the report been made public a year ago, it’s nearly impossible to believe Joe Biden would still be the Democratic nominee for president.
The fall of 2019 seems like a lifetime ago, but it’s worth revisiting to give context to this bombshell report.
As the Democratic race for president took shape last year, the media started asking uncomfortable questions. “Will Hunter Biden Jeopardize His Father’s Campaign?” read the headline of a nearly 11,000-word exposé in the July 2019 issue of The New Yorker.
Other news organizations followed suit. Senate Republicans finally were zoning in on the shady business dealings of their former colleague’s son.
As damaging, potential campaign-ending coverage continued for months, Team Biden threatened social media platforms and journalists for spreading “disinformation” about Hunter Biden.
In October 2019, Biden, in a clip recirculated this week, lashed out at reporters for asking about Hunter Biden’s multimillion dollar overseas contracts. Even his Democratic opponents were piling on. Things were going downhill for the one candidate most establishment Democrats thought had the best chance to beat Donald Trump in 2020.
Well, you know the rest of the story. House Democrats successfully changed the subject by manufacturing an impeachment case against President Trump based on the account of a partisan “whistleblower” connected to Biden. The country, once again, was thrown into political chaos.
The Democrats’ gambit worked. They knew Trump would not be convicted by a Republican Senate, but Hunter Biden’s name quickly vanished from the headlines. America’s complicit news media cowered to the mob-like threats of Team Biden and have since kept their mouths shut. Hunter Biden, unscathed, even made a cameo appearance at the virtual Democratic National Convention.
Trump’s impeachment served two purposes: to bury one more scandal under the self-proclaimed “scandal free” Obama Administration and to save Joe Biden’s candidacy. It was straight-up interference with the 2020 election because without the impeachment diversions, it’s very likely that either Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren, not Biden, would be on the November ballot right now.
The Wolf of Washington
The joint report released this week from the Homeland Security Committee and Senate Finance Committee reads like a Hollywood screenplay. Hunter Biden is the Beltway’s version of Jordan Belfort, the “Wolf of Washington” so to speak, but without the hard-knock start and all the hard work.
The youngest Biden is a well-known womanizer (including sleeping with his late brother’s widow) with a history of drug abuse and bad decisions. With Secret Service protection and access to Air Force Two, Hunter swaggered around the globe during the Obama-Biden presidency, including six trips to China.
A few months after the Navy discharged him for cocaine use, Hunter Biden was hired in May 2014 by Burisma, Ukraine’s largest energy producer owned by Mykola Zlochevsky, who was under investigation in the United States and UK for money laundering among other crimes.
“[O]ver the course of the next several years, Hunter Biden and [business partner] Devon Archer were paid millions of dollars from a corrupt Ukrainian oligarch for their participation on the board,” according to Johnson’s 87-page report. “In addition to the over $4 million paid by Burisma for Hunter Biden’s and Archer’s board memberships, Hunter Biden, his family and Archer received millions of dollars from foreign nationals with questionable backgrounds. The Treasury records . . . show potential criminal activity relating to transactions among and between Hunter Biden, his family, and his associates with Ukrainian, Russian, Kazakh and Chinese nationals.”
Further, what jumps out in the report is that one of impeachment’s star witnesses, instead of informing the American people about the scandal when given the chance, helped turn the focus on the president.
George Kent, the bow-tied deputy assistant secretary of state, publicly testified before the House Intelligence Committee last fall as part of Rep. Adam Schiff’s (D-Calif.) impeachment inquiry. The longtime diplomat became a media darling for his role in bolstering the Democrats’ case against the president.
During the committee’s open hearing, Kent danced around questions about Burisma’s corruption. “Its business reputation is mixed,” Kent cautiously told Republican counsel on November 13, 2019.
Kent repeatedly tried to avoid directly condemning Hunter Biden’s appointment to Burisma’s board. “I believe that companies build their boards with a variety of reasons,” Kent insisted. Kent told the committee he notified the vice president’s staff in early 2015 that Hunter Biden’s status as a board member “could create the possibility of a perception of conflict of interest.”
But his July 2020 closed-door testimony was more forthcoming. Kent elaborated on what he told the vice president’s office. The then-deputy chief at the U.S. embassy in Kyiv, Kent contacted the vice president’s office with an unvarnished plea.
“I thought someone needed to talk to Hunter Biden, and he should [step] down from the board of Burisma,” Kent told the committees. He admitted that he “never heard back from the vice president’s office.”
When that request went nowhere, a year later, Kent emailed senior State Department officials. “The presence of Hunter Biden on the Burisma board was very awkward for all U.S. officials pushing an anti-corruption agenda in Ukraine,” he wrote in a September 2016 email. Kent’s concerns, according to the report, “remained unaddressed.”
Other emails obtained by the committees show Kent’s view of Burisma’s reputation was far from “mixed,” as Kent said publicly. “Zlochevsky was viewed as corrupt, not just in Ukraine but by the USG,” he wrote in the September 2016 email to John Kerry’s State Department. (Kerry’s stepson was a longtime business partner of Hunter.)
Burisma’s owner was a “poster child for corrupt behavior,” he told the committees. Associating or promoting assistance projects with Burisma posed a “moral hazard,” Kent said in another August 2016 email.
That’s quite a contrast to the vague assessment Kent gave the American people last November.
In his November 2019 public testimony, Kent said there was a “strong assumption” that Zlochevsky bribed Ukraine’s prosecutor general in late 2014 to drop the case against Burisma. (Hunter Biden was on the board by then.) “We thought Zlochevsky had stolen money, we thought a prosecutor had taken a bribe to shut the case and those were our main concerns.”
But he told Republicans a slightly different story. Kent confronted the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office about the bribe in early 2015 and demanded to know “who had paid the bribe and how much it was. I also demanded that the case against Zlochevsky be resumed.”
The $7 million bribe was referred to the FBI by a Justice Department official. “At this time, the committees are seeking an explanation from the FBI about what, if any, actions they took after receiving this information from the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv.”
Imagine if Kent had given the same sort of testimony to the American people 10 months ago. What if he had confirmed Burisma’s corruption, the details of the bribery scheme, and the referral to James Comey’s FBI? What if he had told Congress that his pleas were ignored by the vice president’s office and the State Department despite repeated attempts? That the son of the leading Democratic candidate for president was profiting from a deeply corrupt Urkainian oligarch but top Obama Administration officials turned a blind eye at the time?
What if all the damning information in Johnson’s report was revealed in September 2019 and not in September 2020?
The media would have been forced to report it. Impeachment would have been exposed as the diversion that it was. Joe Biden would not have been permitted to continue avoiding all the questions he’s successfully avoided since impeachment. Hunter Biden might be facing serious charges.
And it’s very possible someone else would be sitting atop the Democratic ticket right now.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-25--The Democrats’ Bogus Concern for SCOTUS ‘Norms’

For those keeping track , here 's a list of Democratic Party `` norms '' for placing new justices on the Supreme Court of the United States , as they stand today : Norm No .
1 : When Democrats are in charge of both the Senate and the White House , they are free to nominate and confirm any justice they please , as quickly as they please , as they did in the cases of Ruth Bader Ginsburg , Stephen Breyer , Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan .
Norm No .
2 : When Democrats only run the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nominate any SCOTUS justice they please , and they also get to dictate whom Republicans are allowed to confirm , as they tried to do in the case of Merrick Garland -- blessed be his memory .
Norm No .
3 : When Democrats run neither the nomination process nor the confirmation process , they get to dictate who is confirmed to the Supreme Court , as they argue today in the case of Ruth Bader Ginsburg 's replacement .
Norm No .
4 : If Republicans fail to adhere to all these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ burn everything down to the ground .
( And , of course , I only mean that 90 % metaphorically . )
When Joe Biden implores us to `` cool the flames that have been engulfing our country , '' he is n't speaking to Democrats , who have now threatened to pack the courts , eliminate the legislative filibuster and Electoral College , make D.C. a state and use impeachment as a political cudgel to stop a constitutionally legitimate confirmation process , but rather to warn moderate Republican senators that they should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` constitutional duty '' only four years earlier .
In his Senate speech during the debate over Merrick Garland , Mitch McConnell argued that presidents `` have a right to nominate , just as the Senate has its constitutional right to provide or withhold consent .
In this case , the Senate will withhold it . ''
McConnell 's contention was indisputably true .
It is also true that denying Garland a confirmation vote was a political risk .
Voters had a chance to punish the GOP for that position -- or not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and politicians concocted preposterous arguments to claim that the Republicans were illegally `` stealing '' the seat , which , if true , means that McConnell is , at worst , a hypocrite and that his critics are , at best , demanding that Republicans break the law .
In a New York Times op-ed in 2016 , Biden maintained that McConnell had a `` constitutional duty '' to give the president 's nominee a vote .
If this is true , Biden is now arguing that McConnell 's four-year-old political decision should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is n't , then he was lying .
Per Biden , McConnell abandoned his `` responsibility to the voters of this nation '' back then .
Surely , his stance now is better ?
As a matter of fact , the then-vice president not only argued that denying Garland a vote was unconstitutional but also made the case that it was imperative for the country to have a full complement of nine judges in case the Court was asked to adjudicate an election dispute .
He claimed that as Senate Judiciary Committee chairman @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , he would have moved forward with a nomination `` even a few months before a presidential election . ''
In other words , Biden has forsaken a 36-year position and let the GOP Senate majority leader 's 2016 position become the norm in perpetuity .
Of course , no one believes that .
When examining `` norms , '' it 's worth our remembering that four years have passed since the Garland nomination and that one of the events that transpired in those intervening years was the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ mate , Kamala Harris , was n't cooling `` the flames that have been engulfing our country '' when she entered unsubstantiated gang-rape charged against an eminently qualified Supreme Court nominee into the record .
Nor was Dianne Feinstein when she leaked the allegations against Kavanaugh to the media before allowing her fellow senators to see them .
Nor was Senator Ed Markey , who refused to meet with the nominee , calling him `` illegitimate '' before asking even a single question .
Nor was Senator Mazie Hirono when she said that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ innocence .
Republicans should remember that indecent partisan spectacle every time Democrats are lecturing them about Donald Trump and `` norms . ''
They should also recognize that they have been breaking judicial norms since Robert Bork 's nomination .
Trump is correct that Chuck Schumer would give zero pause in confirming a justice today had roles been reversed .
This is one reason why unilaterally surrendering to these always-evolving standards would amount to political malfeasance .
Long story short : Democrats keep inventing imaginary new `` norms , '' and then threatening @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of American governance if the GOP fails to surrender to them .
That 's not how this works .
That 's not how any of this works .
David Harsanyi is a senior writer at National Review and the author of the book `` First Freedom : A Ride Through America 's Enduring History With the Gun . ''
To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists , visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com .

For those keeping track, here's a list of Democratic Party "norms" for placing new justices on the Supreme Court of the United States, as they stand today:
Norm No. 1: When Democrats are in charge of both the Senate and the White House, they are free to nominate and confirm any justice they please, as quickly as they please, as they did in the cases of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. Norm No. 2: When Democrats only run the White House, they are free to nominate any SCOTUS justice they please, and they also get to dictate whom Republicans are allowed to confirm, as they tried to do in the case of Merrick Garland -- blessed be his memory. Norm No. 3: When Democrats run neither the nomination process nor the confirmation process, they get to dictate who is confirmed to the Supreme Court, as they argue today in the case of Ruth Bader Ginsburg's replacement. Norm No. 4: If Republicans fail to adhere to all these rules, Democrats have a license to burn everything down to the ground. (And, of course, I only mean that 90% metaphorically.)
When Joe Biden implores us to "cool the flames that have been engulfing our country," he isn't speaking to Democrats, who have now threatened to pack the courts, eliminate the legislative filibuster and Electoral College, make D.C. a state and use impeachment as a political cudgel to stop a constitutionally legitimate confirmation process, but rather to warn moderate Republican senators that they shouldn't do what he argued was their "constitutional duty" only four years earlier.
In his Senate speech during the debate over Merrick Garland, Mitch McConnell argued that presidents "have a right to nominate, just as the Senate has its constitutional right to provide or withhold consent. In this case, the Senate will withhold it."
McConnell's contention was indisputably true. It is also true that denying Garland a confirmation vote was a political risk. Voters had a chance to punish the GOP for that position -- or not. Yet, scores of liberal pundits and politicians concocted preposterous arguments to claim that the Republicans were illegally "stealing" the seat, which, if true, means that McConnell is, at worst, a hypocrite and that his critics are, at best, demanding that Republicans break the law.
In a New York Times op-ed in 2016, Biden maintained that McConnell had a "constitutional duty" to give the president's nominee a vote. If this is true, Biden is now arguing that McConnell's four-year-old political decision should trump the constitutional order. If it isn't, then he was lying. Per Biden, McConnell abandoned his "responsibility to the voters of this nation" back then. Surely, his stance now is better?
As a matter of fact, the then-vice president not only argued that denying Garland a vote was unconstitutional but also made the case that it was imperative for the country to have a full complement of nine judges in case the Court was asked to adjudicate an election dispute. He claimed that as Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, a position he held for decades, he would have moved forward with a nomination "even a few months before a presidential election." In other words, Biden has forsaken a 36-year position and let the GOP Senate majority leader's 2016 position become the norm in perpetuity.
Of course, no one believes that.
When examining "norms," it's worth our remembering that four years have passed since the Garland nomination and that one of the events that transpired in those intervening years was the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh. I'm pretty sure Biden's running mate, Kamala Harris, wasn't cooling "the flames that have been engulfing our country" when she entered unsubstantiated gang-rape charged against an eminently qualified Supreme Court nominee into the record. Nor was Dianne Feinstein when she leaked the allegations against Kavanaugh to the media before allowing her fellow senators to see them. Nor was Senator Ed Markey, who refused to meet with the nominee, calling him "illegitimate" before asking even a single question. Nor was Senator Mazie Hirono when she said that Kavanaugh didn't deserve the presumption of innocence.
Republicans should remember that indecent partisan spectacle every time Democrats are lecturing them about Donald Trump and "norms." They should also recognize that they have been breaking judicial norms since Robert Bork's nomination. Trump is correct that Chuck Schumer would give zero pause in confirming a justice today had roles been reversed. This is one reason why unilaterally surrendering to these always-evolving standards would amount to political malfeasance.
Long story short: Democrats keep inventing imaginary new "norms," and then threatening to blow up long-standing, real-life standards of American governance if the GOP fails to surrender to them. That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works.
David Harsanyi is a senior writer at National Review and the author of the book "First Freedom: A Ride Through America's Enduring History With the Gun." To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.


thelibertydaily--2020-09-26--Is Amy Coney Barrett a Religious Zealot?

The left has begun their predictable assault on whoever the President nominates to fill the Supreme Court vacancy created after the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg .
It appears that Amy Coney Barrett is that person if multiple reports are to be believed .
And of course the left is targeting her as a religious zealot who will turn America into “ The Handmaid ’ s Tale.
” To be transparent , I ’ ve never watched the show .
I don ’ t watch many shows anymore unless they ’ re on Crossflix , which I assume makes me @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Except , I ’ m not a zealot based on the left ’ s definition of the term and neither is Barrett .
Are we advocates of our faiths ?
Yes .
Do we allow our faiths to guide us through life ?
Yes .
Do we allow it to dictate all of our actions ?
Absolutely not .
That ’ s what the nihilistic left fails to understand about the faithful .
It seems clear based on this quote from the soon-to-be Supreme Court Justice that she does not allow her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the fulfillment of her duties to the court and to the nation .
That ’ s important to understand .
It ’ s possible to be faithful and still engage with the world in a proper worldly manner .
We may see this world as secondary , but our time in it is not subject to purely spiritual endeavors .
Perhaps it should be , but for most of us it isn ’ t .
The left is going to use Amy Coney Barrett ’ s faith against her .
In reality , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But she does not allow it to dictate her decisions about the Constitution .
She ’ s a judge , and should be judged as such .
COVID-19 may take down an independent news outlet Nobody said running a media site would be easy .
We could use some help keeping this site afloat .
Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever .
My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet .
Paying the bills has never been my forte , but we ’ ve survived @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that help , but since the site ’ s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn ’ t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it .
When I left a nice , corporate career in 2017 , I did so knowing I wouldn ’ t make nearly as much money .
But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ never make a ton of money this way , and we ’ re okay with that .
Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns .
Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically .
We thought we could weather the storm , but the so-called “ surge ” or “ 2nd-wave ” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy .
In short , we are now in desperate need of financial assistance .
The best way NOQ Report @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly .
Alternatively , you can donate through PayPal as well .
We need approximately $ 11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020 , but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated .
The second way to help is to become a partner .
We ’ ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills , it didn ’ t seem necessary .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ pay the bills .
This shouldn ’ t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically .
June , 2018 , we had 11,678 visitors .
A year later in June , 2019 , we were up to 116,194 .
In June , 2020 , we had 614,192 .
We ’ re heading in the right direction and we believe we ’ re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “ get in on the action ” but more importantly who want to help @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should contact me directly with the contact button above .
Election year or not , coronavirus lockdowns or not , anarchic riots or not , the need for truthful journalism endures .
But in these times , we need as many conservative media voices as possible .
Please help keep NOQ Report going .
Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast .
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism .
The coronavirus crisis has prompted many , even some conservatives , to promote authoritarianism .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ now , but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life .
We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time .
If you are interested , please join us to receive updates .

Discern Report is the fastest growing America First news aggregator in the nation.
The left has begun their predictable assault on whoever the President nominates to fill the Supreme Court vacancy created after the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. It appears that Amy Coney Barrett is that person if multiple reports are to be believed. And of course the left is targeting her as a religious zealot who will turn America into “The Handmaid’s Tale.”
To be transparent, I’ve never watched the show. I don’t watch many shows anymore unless they’re on Crossflix, which I assume makes me a religious zealot like Barrett allegedly is. Except, I’m not a zealot based on the left’s definition of the term and neither is Barrett. Are we advocates of our faiths? Yes. Do we allow our faiths to guide us through life? Yes. Do we allow it to dictate all of our actions? Absolutely not. That’s what the nihilistic left fails to understand about the faithful.
It seems clear based on this quote from the soon-to-be Supreme Court Justice that she does not allow her personal beliefs or faith to interfere with the fulfillment of her duties to the court and to the nation. That’s important to understand. It’s possible to be faithful and still engage with the world in a proper worldly manner. We may see this world as secondary, but our time in it is not subject to purely spiritual endeavors. Perhaps it should be, but for most of us it isn’t.
The left is going to use Amy Coney Barrett’s faith against her. In reality, it is one of her strengths. But she does not allow it to dictate her decisions about the Constitution. She’s a judge, and should be judged as such.
COVID-19 may take down an independent news outlet
Nobody said running a media site would be easy. We could use some help keeping this site afloat.
Colleagues have called me the worst fundraiser ever. My skills are squarely rooted on the journalistic side of running a news outlet. Paying the bills has never been my forte, but we’ve survived. We have ads on the site that help, but since the site’s inception this has been a labor of love that otherwise doesn’t bring in the level of revenue necessary to justify it.
When I left a nice, corporate career in 2017, I did so knowing I wouldn’t make nearly as much money. But what we do at NOQ Report to deliver the truth and fight the progressive mainstream media narrative that has plagued this nation is too important for me to sacrifice it for the sake of wealth. We know we’ll never make a ton of money this way, and we’re okay with that.
Things have become harder with the coronavirus lockdowns. Both ad money and donations that have kept us afloat for a while have dropped dramatically. We thought we could weather the storm, but the so-called “surge” or “2nd-wave” that mainstream media and Democrats are pushing has put our prospects in jeopardy. In short, we are now in desperate need of financial assistance.
The best way NOQ Report readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We need approximately $11,500 to stay afloat for the rest of 2020, but more would be wonderful and any amount that brings us closer to our goal is greatly appreciated.
The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. This shouldn’t be the case as our traffic the last year has been going up dramatically. June, 2018, we had 11,678 visitors. A year later in June, 2019, we were up to 116,194. In June, 2020, we had 614,192. We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above.
Election year or not, coronavirus lockdowns or not, anarchic riots or not, the need for truthful journalism endures. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.
This America First, veteran-owned company is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout. Don’t wait for beef to become more scarce. Stock up on freeze-dried cubes made from Ribeyes, NY Strips, and Premium Cuts.is ready to help you eat well today and eat well tomorrow. Use promo code “big15” for 15% off at checkout.
Check out the NEW NOQ Report Podcast.
Join fellow patriots as we form a grassroots movement to advance the cause of conservatism. The coronavirus crisis has prompted many, even some conservatives, to promote authoritarianism. It’s understandable to some extent now, but it must not be allowed to embed itself in American life. We currently have 8000+ patriots with us in a very short time. If you are interested, please join us to receive updates.
[yikes-mailchimp form=”1″]


thelibertydaily--2020-09-26--President Trump: “Black Lives Matter” is Destroying Black Lives

President Donald Trump is blaming the Black Lives Matter movement for violence associated with some protests calling for the end to racial injustice .
During a campaign event to appeal to Black voters , Trump railed against the movement and claimed it is doing more harm than good .
“ Many of those who are spreading violence in our cities are supporters of an organization called Black Lives Matter or BLM , ” Trump said .
He added , “ It ’ s hurting the Black community .
This is an unusual name for an organization whose ideology and tactics @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Trump claimed the goal of the Black Lives Matter movement is to “ achieve the destruction of the nuclear family , ” abolish the police , prisons , border security , capitalism , and school choice .
Check out his remarks below : “ This is not the agenda of the Black community .
This is the agenda of an extreme socialist , or worse , you know what the other word is , marxist , communist , ” Trump said .
He went on , “ This is the extreme socialist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ opinion .
That ’ s why the founders of the organization call themselves trained Marxists.
” Protests continue to erupt after a grand jury decided to bring no direct charges against police officers involved in the fatal shooting of Breonna Taylor , as IJR previously reported .
The police shot Taylor in front of her boyfriend after entering her apartment using a “ no-knock ” warrant .
The death of Taylor , along with that of George Floyd , a Black man who died after a white police officer knelt on his neck @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Two police officers were shot during protests in Louisville following the news of the decision in the Taylor case , as IJR previously reported .
Police Chief Robert Schroeder predicted demonstrations would be going on through the weekend .
According to Schroeder , the two police officers who were shot were expected to recover and a suspect was taken into custody .

President Donald Trump is blaming the Black Lives Matter movement for violence associated with some protests calling for the end to racial injustice.
During a campaign event to appeal to Black voters, Trump railed against the movement and claimed it is doing more harm than good.
“Many of those who are spreading violence in our cities are supporters of an organization called Black Lives Matter or BLM,” Trump said.
He added, “It’s hurting the Black community. This is an unusual name for an organization whose ideology and tactics are right now destroying many Black lives.”
Trump claimed the goal of the Black Lives Matter movement is to “achieve the destruction of the nuclear family,” abolish the police, prisons, border security, capitalism, and school choice.
Check out his remarks below:
https://twitter.com/TeamTrump/status/1309583035411693569
“This is not the agenda of the Black community. This is the agenda of an extreme socialist, or worse, you know what the other word is, marxist, communist,” Trump said.
He went on, “This is the extreme socialist left, but beyond that in my opinion. That’s why the founders of the organization call themselves trained Marxists.”
Protests continue to erupt after a grand jury decided to bring no direct charges against police officers involved in the fatal shooting of Breonna Taylor, as IJR previously reported.
The police shot Taylor in front of her boyfriend after entering her apartment using a “no-knock” warrant.
The death of Taylor, along with that of George Floyd, a Black man who died after a white police officer knelt on his neck in Minneapolis, launched demonstrations nationwide.
Two police officers were shot during protests in Louisville following the news of the decision in the Taylor case, as IJR previously reported.
Police Chief Robert Schroeder predicted demonstrations would be going on through the weekend. According to Schroeder, the two police officers who were shot were expected to recover and a suspect was taken into custody.
Truth and Accuracy
Submit a Correction * Name
* Email
* Message
* All fields are required. Success!
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.
Comment Down Below


thelibertydaily--2020-09-26--‘Infidel’: A Compelling Pro-Christian Thriller Starring Jim Caviezel

In the 1970s , American cinema exploded with a new wave of films at once gritty , fearless and political : Taxi Driver , Blow-Out , Midnight Express and others heralded a revolution that began in the 1960s , These movies offered an adult , realistic alternative to flashy mainstream Hollywood movies and musicals .
Fifty years later , the boldest , bravest and most countercultural film currently in release is Infidel , a pro-Christian thriller starring Jim Caviezel ( The Passion of the Christ , Deja Vu ) .
A credit to the writing and direction to Cyrus Nowrasteh @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The Stoning of Soraya M. , The Young Messiah , and The Path to 9/11 ) .
While Hollywood cranks out super hero fantasies and issues Maoist demands to creators , conservative Christians make movies about real life .
Finely acted , beautifully shot , with a nuanced plot that boldly defends religious freedom , Infidel should prove a film believers and conservatives can get behind , as well as open-minded liberals ( such as we still have left ) .
Go see Infidel , and you ’ ll find it a gripping @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cinematographer Joel Ransom shoots the Middle East ( Jordan ) as a place of great beauty .
But turn the wrong corner and you blunder into menace .
The film presents the region ’ s people honestly and respectfully .
You ’ ll find haunting the beautiful children and the brave minority of Christians forced to worship in secret .
Caviezel plays popular Christian blogger Doug Rawlins .
He travels to Cairo to participate in a conference on religion .
In a live televised dialogue , a Muslim host explores similarities between between @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jesus Christ , ” the man says .
He goes on to explain that Islam considers Jesus a great man and a great prophet .
Duly warned by his wife Liz ( Claudia Karvan ) , who works for the State Department , to be cautious , Doug nonetheless speaks his belief .
“ Jesus , ” he says directly into the camera ( and to the millions of Muslims watching ) “ is God .
And He wants to be your God.
” There are certain things you just can ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ increasingly , in America ) .
A few hours later , Doug gets kidnapped from his hotel room by terrorists backed by Iran .
Dragged to Lebanon , tortured and ordered to confess to spying , Doug refuses .
We might expect what follows to play out as a simplistic good-vs-evil thriller , with all-American Doug against his swarthy , stereotypical Hezbollah tormentors .
But Infidel reaches for more than that .
Yes , the film unapologetically comes down on the side of freedom of conscience .
But writer-director Nowrasteh plays fair with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
When Doug sees his wife at his Iranian show trail , he breaks down in regret about how his “ ego caused all of this.
” He ’ s wrong about that , of course , and quickly recovers his conscientious defiance of what is in essence a totalitarian , Soviet-style system .
Lots of Blame to Go Around Hal Ozsan is great as Ramzi , the articulate and menacing thug who tortures Doug .
In a brief moment of vulnerability , Ramzi , who is Persian and Kurdish and with a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ back story .
As a boy refugee in London , he was tormented by white supremacists .
They tossed milk bottles at him and shouted for him and his mother to “ go back home.
” So Ramzi tells Doug , “ You [ Christians ] started this religious war.
” Thus the cruelty of an intolerant few gets weaponized to justify a grand jihad .
Doug ’ s wife Liz doesn ’ t share his faith .
Not since losing her unborn baby in a car accident , at which point she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ me.
” Nor does the film easily resolve her grief and doubt .
Again , the filmmakers seem determined to set Infidel in the real world , where alienation from God can last decades , or even a lifetime .
The only drawback I found in Infidel is its final action sequences , which went on too long .
They felt like a concession to blockbuster Hollywood idiocy , a bit jarring after ninety minutes of adult drama .
Go see this film .
You ’ ll enjoy it immensely , and help @ @ @ @ @ @ @ done well enough that this week it is expanding into hundreds of more theaters .
Christians who complain about Hollywood should seek it out and support it .
They won ’ t regret it .
Mark Judge is a writer and filmmaker in Washington , D.C .

In the 1970s, American cinema exploded with a new wave of films at once gritty, fearless and political: Taxi Driver, Blow-Out, Midnight Express and others heralded a revolution that began in the 1960s, These movies offered an adult, realistic alternative to flashy mainstream Hollywood movies and musicals.
Fifty years later, the boldest, bravest and most countercultural film currently in release is Infidel, a pro-Christian thriller starring Jim Caviezel (The Passion of the Christ, Deja Vu). A credit to the writing and direction to Cyrus Nowrasteh (The Day Reagan Was Shot, The Stoning of Soraya M., The Young Messiah, and The Path to 9/11). While Hollywood cranks out super hero fantasies and issues Maoist demands to creators, conservative Christians make movies about real life.
Finely acted, beautifully shot, with a nuanced plot that boldly defends religious freedom, Infidel should prove a film believers and conservatives can get behind, as well as open-minded liberals (such as we still have left).
Gripping and Thoughtful
Go see Infidel , and you’ll find it a gripping, entertaining, and thought-provoking film. Cinematographer Joel Ransom shoots the Middle East (Jordan) as a place of great beauty. But turn the wrong corner and you blunder into menace. The film presents the region’s people honestly and respectfully. You’ll find haunting the beautiful children and the brave minority of Christians forced to worship in secret.
Caviezel plays popular Christian blogger Doug Rawlins. He travels to Cairo to participate in a conference on religion. In a live televised dialogue, a Muslim host explores similarities between between the two faiths. “We love Jesus Christ,” the man says. He goes on to explain that Islam considers Jesus a great man and a great prophet. Duly warned by his wife Liz (Claudia Karvan), who works for the State Department, to be cautious, Doug nonetheless speaks his belief.
Crossing the Red Line: Jesus
“Jesus,” he says directly into the camera (and to the millions of Muslims watching) “is God. And He wants to be your God.” There are certain things you just can’t say in the Middle East (or increasingly, in America). A few hours later, Doug gets kidnapped from his hotel room by terrorists backed by Iran. Dragged to Lebanon, tortured and ordered to confess to spying, Doug refuses.
Jesus is God. And He wants to be your God.
We might expect what follows to play out as a simplistic good-vs-evil thriller, with all-American Doug against his swarthy, stereotypical Hezbollah tormentors. But Infidel reaches for more than that. Yes, the film unapologetically comes down on the side of freedom of conscience. But writer-director Nowrasteh plays fair with all the characters, including the Muslims.
When Doug sees his wife at his Iranian show trail, he breaks down in regret about how his “ego caused all of this.” He’s wrong about that, of course, and quickly recovers his conscientious defiance of what is in essence a totalitarian, Soviet-style system.
Lots of Blame to Go Around
Hal Ozsan is great as Ramzi, the articulate and menacing thug who tortures Doug. In a brief moment of vulnerability, Ramzi, who is Persian and Kurdish and with a thick British accent, reveals his own back story. As a boy refugee in London, he was tormented by white supremacists. They tossed milk bottles at him and shouted for him and his mother to “go back home.” So Ramzi tells Doug, “You [Christians] started this religious war.” Thus the cruelty of an intolerant few gets weaponized to justify a grand jihad.
Doug’s wife Liz doesn’t share his faith. Not since losing her unborn baby in a car accident, at which point she decided, “God is done with me.” Nor does the film easily resolve her grief and doubt. Again, the filmmakers seem determined to set Infidel in the real world, where alienation from God can last decades, or even a lifetime.
Support this Worthy Project
The only drawback I found in Infidel is its final action sequences, which went on too long. They felt like a concession to blockbuster Hollywood idiocy, a bit jarring after ninety minutes of adult drama.
Please Support The Stream : Equipping Christians to Think Clearly About the Political, Economic, and Moral Issues of Our Day.
Go see this film. You’ll enjoy it immensely, and help a worthy production succeed. Infidel has done well enough that this week it is expanding into hundreds of more theaters. Christians who complain about Hollywood should seek it out and support it. They won’t regret it.
Mark Judge is a writer and filmmaker in Washington, D.C.