thelibertydaily--2020-12-16--San Francisco Unified School District To Rename Abraham Lincoln H.S., Caving To Demands Of BLM Commu

San Francisco Unified School District To Rename Abraham Lincoln H.S., Caving To Demands Of BLM Communist Revolutionaries

After all , what has the Great Emancipator ever done to benefit black lives — Hmmm ?
What happens when you allow cynical , Marxist anti-American ideology to overrun the education system ?
THIS is what happens when you allow cynical , Marxist , anti-American ideology to overrun the education system .
A San Francisco district is planning to rename a school named after Abraham Lincoln because the former president did not demonstrate that ‘ black lives mattered to him ’ .
The president , who is often held up as an American hero for abolishing slavery , is just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have their names scratched off schools within the San Francisco Unified School District .
Other names include George Washington , Herbert Hoover and Senator Dianne Feinstein , whose name will be stripped from the Dianne Feinstein Elementary School for allowing the Confederate flag to fly outside City Hall back in 1984 when she was mayor .
…The district ’ s renaming committee decided Lincoln is not worthy of keeping his name on Abraham Lincoln High School because ‘ the majority of his policies proved to be detrimental to [ Native Americans ] .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ as much of a hero at all among many American Indian Nations and Native peoples of the United States , as the majority of his policies proved to be detrimental to them , ’ the committee meeting notes state .
Under his watch , Indigenous peoples had much of their land taken away from them .
– DailyMail Even his attitude toward the people whose emancipation he fought for was called into quesiton by the great erasers of history .
We wouldn ’ t want history to remember the guy who kept the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ officially ended slavery or anything because , hey , they were able to find an interest group with an ax to grind against him .
If you think natives disliked him , just wait until you hear about what the Confederates thought of him !
Roosevelt ’ s on the list too for not being woke enough .
Forget the fact that his inviting Booker T. Washington to dine with him at the White House was precedent-setting .
( He ’ s a Republican , so that ‘ first ’ probably doesn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s snarky headline says it all : ‘ Abe Lincoln Canceled in San Fran .
School Because Being Murdered by a Democrat for Freeing Slaves Doesn ’ t Show He Cared Enough About Black Lives ‘ Pussification : The Effeminization Of The American Male Doug Giles , best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog , ClashDaily.com , has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity .
That is , if the man-child will put down his frappuccino ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome .
Buy Now : Pussification : The Effeminization Of The American Male

After all, what has the Great Emancipator ever done to benefit black lives — Hmmm?
What happens when you allow cynical, Marxist anti-American ideology to overrun the education system?
This.
THIS is what happens when you allow cynical, Marxist, anti-American ideology to overrun the education system.
A San Francisco district is planning to rename a school named after Abraham Lincoln because the former president did not demonstrate that ‘black lives mattered to him’. The president, who is often held up as an American hero for abolishing slavery, is just one of 44 historical figures soon to have their names scratched off schools within the San Francisco Unified School District. Other names include George Washington, Herbert Hoover and Senator Dianne Feinstein, whose name will be stripped from the Dianne Feinstein Elementary School for allowing the Confederate flag to fly outside City Hall back in 1984 when she was mayor. …The district’s renaming committee decided Lincoln is not worthy of keeping his name on Abraham Lincoln High School because ‘the majority of his policies proved to be detrimental to [Native Americans].’ ‘Abraham Lincoln is not seen as much of a hero at all among many American Indian Nations and Native peoples of the United States, as the majority of his policies proved to be detrimental to them,’ the committee meeting notes state. Under his watch, Indigenous peoples had much of their land taken away from them. – DailyMail
Even his attitude toward the people whose emancipation he fought for was called into quesiton by the great erasers of history.
‘Lincoln, like the presidents before him and most after, did not show through policy or rhetoric that black lives ever mattered to them outside of human capital and as casualties of wealth building.’ – DailyMail
Right.
We wouldn’t want history to remember the guy who kept the country from splitting in half and who officially ended slavery or anything because, hey, they were able to find an interest group with an ax to grind against him.
If you think natives disliked him, just wait until you hear about what the Confederates thought of him!
Roosevelt’s on the list too for not being woke enough. Forget the fact that his inviting Booker T. Washington to dine with him at the White House was precedent-setting. (He’s a Republican, so that ‘first’ probably doesn’t count.)
Jim Treacher’s snarky headline says it all:
‘Abe Lincoln Canceled in San Fran. School Because Being Murdered by a Democrat for Freeing Slaves Doesn’t Show He Cared Enough About Black Lives‘
’nuff said.
Pussification: The Effeminization Of The American Male
by Doug Giles
Doug Giles, best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog, ClashDaily.com, has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity. That is, if the man-child will put down his frappuccino; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome. Buy Now: Pussification: The Effeminization Of The American Male


thelibertydaily--2020-12-16--Chicago Cops Raid Wrong Home and Handcuff Innocent, Naked Woman; The Democrat-Run City Tried to Keep

Chicago Cops Raid Wrong Home and Handcuff Innocent, Naked Woman; The Democrat-Run City Tried to Keep Video From Being Released

Chicago cops raid wrong home and handcuff innocent , naked woman .
The city tried to keep video from being @ @ @ @ @ be right .
How is this legal ? '

Newly released body-camera footage shows Chicago Police Department officers raiding the wrong home and handcuffing an innocent woman for 20 minutes while she was nude — before realizing their mistake. The police had the wrong address from an informant.
City officials are under fire for making a last-ditch effort to block a local television station from posting video Tuesday of the incident that occurred nearly two years ago.
What are the details?
Last year, officers broke in the door of longtime social worker Anjanette Young who says she had just arrived home from work on Feb. 21 and had undressed in her room when the police charged inside at 7 p.m. with guns drawn.
Following the incident, Young filed a Freedom of Information Act request to obtain the body-camera footage, but the department denied her requests, according to WBBM-TV.
But Young recently received the video and it was aired Tuesday by WBBM, despite Chicago city attorneys filing an emergency motion in an attempt to block the outlet from doing so.
The video shows officers breaking in the door, and Young pleading to know what is going on as she stands nude with her arms in the air in the living room while the police run through her home. She can be seen sobbing, repeatedly insisting to the room full of male officers that they have "the wrong house."
At one point, she says, "This cannot be right. How is this legal?"
After a few minutes, an officer places a jacket around her shoulders, but the front part of her naked body, of course, remained exposed. Then, an officer wraps one of Young's blankets around her body, but she was unable to keep herself covered because of her hands being cuffed behind her back.
She pleads with the officers while telling them that she lives alone, and that she has lived in her home for four years. She cries, "There is no gun in this place. I'm a social worker, I've been a social worker for 20 years. I follow the law. I don't get in trouble for anything. I don't do illegal stuff. I'm not that person. You've got the wrong person."
Officers eventually apologize, try to repair front door
The body-camera footage also shows that after speaking with Young for several minutes, two officers return to a patrol vehicle where they review documentation regarding the warrant.
One can be heard saying, "It wasn't initially approved or some crap."
He adds, "I mean, they told him it was approved. Then, I guess that person messed up on their end."
The CPD would not comment to WBBM on the officers' exchange. Eventually, the officers tell Young that they believe her, apologize, and attempt to do makeshift repairs to her front door since it was no longer functional after being rammed in.
According to the Chicago Tribune, WBBM "has reportedly extensively on Chicago police officers raiding the wrong home," and called Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot's (D) attorneys' request to block the station from airing the report as "extraordinary."
Lightfoot distanced herself from the incident when questioned about it during an unrelated news conference, saying that it happened before her taking office. But, the newspaper noted, it was Lightfoot's administration that sought to prevent the video from being shown to the public.
Young is suing the police department over the incident. Her attorney, Keenan Saulter, told WBBM, "If this had been a young woman in Lincoln Park by herself in her home, naked — a young white woman, let's just be frank — if the reaction would have been the same. I don't think it would have been. I think they would have saw that woman, rightfully so, as someone who was vulnerable. Someone who deserved protection. Someone who deserved to have their dignity maintained."
He argued, "They viewed Ms. Young as less than human."


thelibertydaily--2020-12-17--SHOCK: Democrat Rep. Tulsi Gabbard Introduces Bill to Protect Pain-Capable Preborn Children [Why Doe

SHOCK: Democrat Rep. Tulsi Gabbard Introduces Bill to Protect Pain-Capable Preborn Children [Why Doesn’t She Switch Parties?]

After introducing a bill to protect abortion survivors last week , Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard ( D-Hawaii ) has introduced a second pro-life bill .
HR 8939 aims to protect pain-capable preborn children from abortion .
The full text of the bill is currently unavailable , but Democrats for Life of America ( DFLA ) wasted no time in thanking Gabbard .
“ Former Democratic Presidential Candidate Tulsi Gabbard introduced her SECOND Pro-Life bill this week , which would amend Title 18 of the U.S. code to give pain-capable fetuses rights under the law , ” the group said on Facebook @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this bill three times , but is now the SPONSOR of the new bill .
[ … ] thank you Tulsi !
” DFLA has created a petition asking members of Congress to support Gabbard ’ s pain-capable abortion bill .
The organization also has a petition asking Congress to support her abortion survivors protection bill .
Pro-Life San Francisco also thanked Gabbard on Facebook .
“ Democratic House Rep and former Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard has introduced two crucial bills , one to protect pain-capable fetuses and another to ensure the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” the group wrote .
“ Both are fundamental to ensuring justice for UCSF ’ s most vulnerable victims of fetal organ harvesting , and we are inspired to see them originate from a left-leaning national legislator .
The future of California , the Democratic Party , and all of America is pro-life !
” In the past , Gabbard has had a 100 % pro-abortion voting record , including voting against similar pro-life bills to the ones she has introduced this month .
However , Gabbard ’ s desire to see restrictions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ earned her criticism from many in the Democratic Party .
Despite this , she has not backed down from this new stance .
In a September 2019 interview , Gabbard said she was once pro-life but now holds “ a more libertarian position on this issue.
” The previously introduced Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act would have banned abortion after 20 weeks when it is generally believed that preborn children can feel pain , though more than one study has found that pre-born children are capable of feeling pain by the end of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ studies found that the nervous system develops sooner than previously believed .
The other study found that by 13 weeks , the ability to feel pain is nearly certain .
Despite this , anesthesia is never used on preborn children before they are suctioned , dismembered , or lethally injected during abortion procedures .
“ Like ” Live Action News on Facebook for more pro-life news and commentary !

After introducing a bill to protect abortion survivors last week, Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) has introduced a second pro-life bill. HR 8939 aims to protect pain-capable preborn children from abortion.
The full text of the bill is currently unavailable, but Democrats for Life of America (DFLA) wasted no time in thanking Gabbard. “Former Democratic Presidential Candidate Tulsi Gabbard introduced her SECOND Pro-Life bill this week, which would amend Title 18 of the U.S. code to give pain-capable fetuses rights under the law,” the group said on Facebook. “Tulsi has previously voted against this bill three times, but is now the SPONSOR of the new bill. […] thank you Tulsi!”
DFLA has created a petition asking members of Congress to support Gabbard’s pain-capable abortion bill. The organization also has a petition asking Congress to support her abortion survivors protection bill.
Pro-Life San Francisco also thanked Gabbard on Facebook. “Democratic House Rep and former Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard has introduced two crucial bills, one to protect pain-capable fetuses and another to ensure the provision of healthcare for abortion survivors,” the group wrote. “Both are fundamental to ensuring justice for UCSF’s most vulnerable victims of fetal organ harvesting, and we are inspired to see them originate from a left-leaning national legislator. The future of California, the Democratic Party, and all of America is pro-life!”
In the past, Gabbard has had a 100% pro-abortion voting record, including voting against similar pro-life bills to the ones she has introduced this month. However, Gabbard’s desire to see restrictions on abortion in the third trimester has earned her criticism from many in the Democratic Party. Despite this, she has not backed down from this new stance. In a September 2019 interview, Gabbard said she was once pro-life but now holds “a more libertarian position on this issue.”
The previously introduced Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act would have banned abortion after 20 weeks when it is generally believed that preborn children can feel pain, though more than one study has found that pre-born children are capable of feeling pain by the end of the first trimester. One of those studies found that the nervous system develops sooner than previously believed. The other study found that by 13 weeks, the ability to feel pain is nearly certain.
Despite this, anesthesia is never used on preborn children before they are suctioned, dismembered, or lethally injected during abortion procedures.
“Like” Live Action News on Facebook for more pro-life news and commentary!


thelibertydaily--2020-12-17--Majority of Americans Worried That Governments Will Retain Expansive New Powers After Scamdemic Ends

A majority of registered U.S. voters are worried that government officials in the U.S. will retain their newly claimed expansive @ @ @ @ @ the COVID-19 pandemic , according to a new Just the News Daily Poll with Scott @ @ @ @ @ the respondents said they were somewhat or very worried about American governments holding onto their @ @ @ @ @ crisis finally subsides .
Just 32 % were unconcerned with that prospect .
U.S. governments @ @ @ @ @ for themselves considerable powers related to the COVID-19 pandemic over 2020 , including the power @ @ @ @ @ deem `` non-essential '' businesses , the power to mandate face coverings in most public @ @ @ @ @ regulations on religious life and worship .
The survey was taken by 1,200 registered voters @ @ @ @ @ Dec. 10-12 .
To see the poll 's cross-demographic tabulations , click here .
To @ @ @ @ @ and sample demographics , click here .

A majority of registered U.S. voters are worried that government officials in the U.S. will retain their newly claimed expansive powers following the end of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a new Just the News Daily Poll with Scott Rasmussen.
Sixty-two percent of the respondents said they were somewhat or very worried about American governments holding onto their pandemic powers after the health crisis finally subsides. Just 32% were unconcerned with that prospect.
Image Just the News Daily Poll With Scott Rasmussen
U.S. governments at all levels have claimed for themselves considerable powers related to the COVID-19 pandemic over 2020, including the power to shut down what they deem "non-essential" businesses, the power to mandate face coverings in most public settings, and even far-reaching regulations on religious life and worship.
The survey was taken by 1,200 registered voters and conducted by Rasmussen from Dec. 10-12.
To see the poll's cross-demographic tabulations, click here.
To see the poll's methodology and sample demographics, click here.


thelibertydaily--2020-12-17--GOP Rep. Brian Babin ‘Disappointed’ McConnell Called Beijing Biden ‘President-Elect’

Rep. Brian Babin said during an interview on The Water Cooler with David Brody that he was `` disappointed '' with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell 's decision to call Joe Biden `` president-elect . ''
`` I was very disappointed because it 's really not final until January the 6th when those electoral votes are ratified and certified by the House and the Senate , '' the Texas Republican said .
`` And until that time I think that there 's just too many allegations , too many hundreds and hundreds of sworn affidavits . ''
Biden received more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ win a presidential contest .
The electoral votes will be counted during a Jan. 6th joint session of Congress presided over by Vice President Mike Pence .
According to reports , Sen. McConnell has opposed the prospect of GOP senators contesting results on Jan. 6th .
President Trump and others have alleged that fraud tainted the election and the president has not conceded in the contest .
“ Many millions of us had hoped the presidential election would yield a different result , ” McConnell , a Republican from Kentucky , said Tuesday @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our system of government has processes to determine who will be sworn in on January the 20th .
The Electoral College has spoken .
So today I want to congratulate President-Elect Joe Biden .
”

Rep. Brian Babin said during an interview on The Water Cooler with David Brody that he was "disappointed" with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's decision to call Joe Biden "president-elect."
"I was very disappointed because it's really not final until January the 6th when those electoral votes are ratified and certified by the House and the Senate," the Texas Republican said. "And until that time I think that there's just too many allegations, too many hundreds and hundreds of sworn affidavits."
Biden received more than the 270 electoral votes required to win a presidential contest. The electoral votes will be counted during a Jan. 6th joint session of Congress presided over by Vice President Mike Pence. According to reports, Sen. McConnell has opposed the prospect of GOP senators contesting results on Jan. 6th.
President Trump and others have alleged that fraud tainted the election and the president has not conceded in the contest.
“Many millions of us had hoped the presidential election would yield a different result,” McConnell, a Republican from Kentucky, said Tuesday on the Senate floor. “But our system of government has processes to determine who will be sworn in on January the 20th. The Electoral College has spoken. So today I want to congratulate President-Elect Joe Biden.”


thelibertydaily--2020-12-16--Dana Loesch: Too Many Americans Want a Vaccine Mandate, Want to Be Ruled

A new ABC/Ipsos poll shows “ only ” 39 percent of Americans want states to make the COVID-19 vaccine mandatory @ @ @ @ @ way too much for me , ” Dana Loesch responded on Tuesday .
“ Freedom @ @ @ @ @ ” she said and the pandemic has exposed the extent to which that is true @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Free people don ’ t ask permission , ” Loesch added .
“ @ @ @ @ @ people in this country who desperately seek to be ruled… it is an infringement upon @ @ @ @

A new ABC/Ipsos poll shows “only” 39 percent of Americans want states to make the COVID-19 vaccine mandatory. “That’s way too much for me,” Dana Loesch responded on Tuesday.
“Freedom is not for everybody,” she said and the pandemic has exposed the extent to which that is true even for some so-called conservatives. “Free people don’t ask permission,” Loesch added.
“There are a lot of people in this country who desperately seek to be ruled… it is an infringement upon individual liberty.”


thelibertydaily--2020-12-16--Bill O’Reilly: How Bill Barr Failed America

Attorney General Bill Barr has resigned and Bill O ’ Reilly says he is “ so disappointed ” in his @ @ @ @ @ He presented the good , bad , and ugly of his departure on the No @ @ @ @ @ Bill said that while President Trump and Barr are presenting an amicable departure , that @ @ @ @ @ .
The president is “ absolutely livid ” that General Barr did not set the @ @ @ @ @ after Joe Biden appeared to lie to Americans in the first presidential debate .
O @ @ @ @ @ put his own self-interest ahead of what was best for the country .
“ He @ @ @ @ @ special counsel to look into the election… and the Durham investigation , where the hell @ @ @ @

Attorney General Bill Barr has resigned and Bill O’Reilly says he is “so disappointed” in his performance as of late. He presented the good, bad, and ugly of his departure on the No Spin News on Tuesday.
Bill said that while President Trump and Barr are presenting an amicable departure, that is far from the reality. The president is “absolutely livid” that General Barr did not set the record straight on Hunter Biden after Joe Biden appeared to lie to Americans in the first presidential debate.
O’Reilly added that Barr put his own self-interest ahead of what was best for the country.
“He didn’t appoint a special counsel to look into the election… and the Durham investigation, where the hell is that?”
WATCH NOW:


thelibertydaily--2020-12-16--The Modern Democrat Party Is Anti-American

Jesse Kelly gave a shoutout to Steve Deace on Tuesday for coining the phrase “ the Life Alert presidency ” @ @ @ @ @ said resonated with him because it is as hilarious as it is true .
Kelly @ @ @ @ @ s Electoral College victory speech in which he repeatedly coughed before saying , “ Every @ @ @ @ @ on Joe Biden we ’ re gon na be like ‘ I knew it , @ @ @ @ @ ” Jesse rebuked Joe Biden ’ s claim that “ we share in common a @ @ @ @ @ : “ No , we don ’ t… The Democratic Party is now , it @ @ @ @ @ it is anti-American .
”

Jesse Kelly gave a shoutout to Steve Deace on Tuesday for coining the phrase “the Life Alert presidency” for Joe Biden which he said resonated with him because it is as hilarious as it is true.
Kelly played footage from Biden’s Electoral College victory speech in which he repeatedly coughed before saying, “Every time a mysterious mark appears on Joe Biden we’re gonna be like ‘I knew it, this is it!'”
Jesse rebuked Joe Biden’s claim that “we share in common a love for this country”:
“No, we don’t… The Democratic Party is now, it’s not un-American, it is anti-American.”
WATCH:


thelibertydaily--2020-12-16--Leaked Audio Shows WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange Urging Hillary Clinton’s State Department to Tak

New leaked audio released by James O ’ Keefe of Project Veritas shows WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange pleading with the U.S. State Department to take action to protect national security interests from an upcoming document leak .
In the audio , WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange talked with Cliff Johnson , an attorney with the U.S. State Department , in 2011 .
He called to warn them about a potentially dangerous dump of classified documents that would be hitting the public soon .
“ We have intelligence that the State Department Database Archive of 250,000 diplomatic cables ( communications ) including @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is to the degree that we believe that within the next few days that it will become public and we ’ re not sure but the timing could be imminently or within the next few days to a week , and there may be some possibility to stop it , ” Assange explained to Johnson .
The State Department under Hillary Clinton did not seem too concerned with stopping the leak .
Veritas pointed out that WikiLeaks had intended to release the redacted cables to protect national security concerns while letting the public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had journalistic merit before a breach occurred .
take our poll - story continues below “ In case there are any individuals who haven ’ t been warned that they should be warned , ” Assange said .
“ So the material , there is an encrypted version of the materials on the internet somewhere that we do not control .
One doesn ’ t need to convey the material itself , one only needs to convey the location of the material , and its encryption key.
” Assange suggested to the U.S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the files in order to stop them from being spread .
“ There is another possibility which is the taking down of those files , that is a degree of research and effort that we do not have the capacity to do .
There are not so many of them , ” Assange said .
“ Our view is that it ’ s more your problem than it is ours but we have been calling the State Department and the Embassy for over a day trying to explain the urgency and they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ call , ” he added .
The entire clip can be seen here : A bipartisan movement has formulated led by Rep. Tulsi Gabbard ( D-HI ) , Rep. Thomas Massie ( R-KY ) , and Congresswoman-elect Marjorie Taylor Greene ( R-GA ) for President Donald Trump to pardon Julian Assange , who is currently withering away in a British prison awaiting extradition : Soon-to-be Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia is joining a movement urging President Donald Trump to pardon NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden and Wikileaks founder Julian Assange for opposing deep @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reference to a renewed push from Rep. Tulsi Gabbard ( D-HI ) for President Trump to pardon Snowden and Assange .
“ Since you ’ re giving pardons to people , please consider pardoning those who , at great personal sacrifice , exposed the deception and criminality of those in the deep state , ” the iconoclastic progressive lawmaker wrote in a tweet .
“ Brave whistleblowers exposing lies & illegal actions in our government must be protected , ” Gabbard wrote in a Twitter post accompanying a video recording earlier this year @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Pass my bipartisan legislation ( HRes1162 , HRes1175 , HR8452 ) calling for charges against @ snowden & Assange to be dropped & to reform the Espionage Act.
” …Greene is showing how the Republican Party should be shifting with Trump at the helm .
Greene ’ s rise represents a populist , anti-establishment GOP that rejects neocon usurpers like former South Carolina governor Nikki Haley and Rep. Dan Crenshaw ( R-TX ) .
President Trump ’ s vindication of Assange could be his final trump card to defeat the deep state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ revolution coup to oust him .

Leaked Audio Shows WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange Urging Hillary Clinton’s State Department to Take Action to Protect Sensitive Documents
New leaked audio released by James O’Keefe of Project Veritas shows WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange pleading with the U.S. State Department to take action to protect national security interests from an upcoming document leak.
In the audio, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange talked with Cliff Johnson, an attorney with the U.S. State Department, in 2011. He called to warn them about a potentially dangerous dump of classified documents that would be hitting the public soon.
“We have intelligence that the State Department Database Archive of 250,000 diplomatic cables (communications) including declassified cables is being spread around and is to the degree that we believe that within the next few days that it will become public and we’re not sure but the timing could be imminently or within the next few days to a week, and there may be some possibility to stop it,” Assange explained to Johnson.
The State Department under Hillary Clinton did not seem too concerned with stopping the leak. Veritas pointed out that WikiLeaks had intended to release the redacted cables to protect national security concerns while letting the public understand the parts of the documents that had journalistic merit before a breach occurred.
“In case there are any individuals who haven’t been warned that they should be warned,” Assange said. “So the material, there is an encrypted version of the materials on the internet somewhere that we do not control. One doesn’t need to convey the material itself, one only needs to convey the location of the material, and its encryption key.”
Assange suggested to the U.S. State Department that they strategically remove some of the files in order to stop them from being spread.
“There is another possibility which is the taking down of those files, that is a degree of research and effort that we do not have the capacity to do. There are not so many of them,” Assange said.
“Our view is that it’s more your problem than it is ours but we have been calling the State Department and the Embassy for over a day trying to explain the urgency and they have not called back other than this call,” he added.
The entire clip can be seen here:
BREAKING: @Project_Veritas Obtains Recording Of Call Between @Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange & Lawyer In Hillary Clinton's State Dept. Warns US Government Trouble Was Coming Their Way With Unredacted Release Of Classified Cables Stolen From Wikileaks pic.twitter.com/hx5u2fSzuC — James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) December 16, 2020
A bipartisan movement has formulated led by Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI), Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), and Congresswoman-elect Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) for President Donald Trump to pardon Julian Assange, who is currently withering away in a British prison awaiting extradition:
Soon-to-be Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia is joining a movement urging President Donald Trump to pardon NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden and Wikileaks founder Julian Assange for opposing deep state corruption… Greene made the comment in reference to a renewed push from Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) for President Trump to pardon Snowden and Assange. “Since you’re giving pardons to people, please consider pardoning those who, at great personal sacrifice, exposed the deception and criminality of those in the deep state,” the iconoclastic progressive lawmaker wrote in a tweet. “Brave whistleblowers exposing lies & illegal actions in our government must be protected,” Gabbard wrote in a Twitter post accompanying a video recording earlier this year. “Join me and urge Congress: Pass my bipartisan legislation (HRes1162, HRes1175, HR8452) calling for charges against @snowden & Assange to be dropped & to reform the Espionage Act.” …Greene is showing how the Republican Party should be shifting with Trump at the helm. Greene’s rise represents a populist, anti-establishment GOP that rejects neocon usurpers like former South Carolina governor Nikki Haley and Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX).
President Trump’s vindication of Assange could be his final trump card to defeat the deep state before they can finish off their color revolution coup to oust him.


thelibertydaily--2020-12-16--You Know Things are Bad in America When the Lefty President of Mexico is Calling Lockdowns a ‘Dictat

You Know Things are Bad in America When the Lefty President of Mexico is Calling Lockdowns a ‘Dictatorship’

The Republican leader in in the Legislative Branch declares the election over even before the state electors ’ ...

Last Updated on December 16, 2020
Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador has described coronavirus lockdowns as “dictatorship” during a recent press conference with reporters.
He described such lockdown measures as “fashionable among authorities … who want to show they are heavy handed, dictatorship”, according a report by the Associated Press.
He went on to claim that the advocates of such measures have “authoritarian instincts” and do not respect the freedom of the Mexican people.
“A lot of them are letting their authoritarian instincts show,” he stated. “The fundamental thing is to guarantee liberty.”
López Obrador has strongly resisted efforts to introduce lockdowns and curfews in Mexico, despite the popularity of such measures in other Latin American countries. However, just as in the United States and Brazil, many state and local officials have defied the President and introduced various restrictions at lower levels of government.
For example, the third most populous state in Mexico, Jalisco, currently governed by the opposition left-liberal Citizens’ Movement, has introduced a mask mandate in all public areas. Other states have gone further still, introducing stay-at-home orders and shutting non-essential businesses. Even states governed by conservative politicians, such as Puebla, Nuevo León and Tamaulipas, have adopted strict lockdown restrictions.
During the press conference, López Obrador also spoke out against mask mandates, expressing his belief that wearing a mask should be voluntary.
“Everyone is free,” López Obrador added. “Whoever wants to wear a face mask and feel safer is welcome to do so.”
The Mexican federal government under López Obrador has taken a skeptical attitude towards both the mass use of face masks and mass testing of the population for COVID-19.
Although a hard-leftist, López Obrador has been a prominent skeptic of excessive government power over the course of this pandemic. He also declined to congratulate Joe Biden for over 5 weeks after the November election, citing his own struggles with electoral fraud in the 2006 Mexican presidential election. That election was widely speculated to have been rigged in favor of López Obrador’s opponent, center-right candidate Felipe Calderón. López Obrador has compared his treatment by the media during that period to the treatment of President Trump over the last month.
The Globe and Mail reports:
Mr. Lopez Obrador, who is known as AMLO, questioned how media outlets could “censor” the U.S. President by cutting away from his untested claims of electoral fraud. “In Mexico, we’re accustomed to how they used to censor us,” he said in a morning press conference on Nov. 9. “But in the case of the United States, what happened is something special.”
By contrast, the American left has denounced any suggestion of fraud in the 2020 U.S. elections, and has wholly embraced lockdown restrictions. Their dogged loyalty to the U.S. establishment has not been rewarded, with Biden downplaying prospects of far-left Sen. Bernie Sanders (D-VT) being given a Cabinet post.


thelibertydaily--2020-12-17--Fascism Update: Twitter Says It Will REMOVE All Posts Claiming Vaccines Can Harm People

Twitter has declared that it will remove all posts that suggest there are any “ adverse impacts or effects of receiving vaccinations , ” despite reports already emerging of health workers getting sick from taking Pfizer ’ s coronavirus shot .
Twitter announced that beginning next week it will memory-hole any posts that “ invoke a deliberate conspiracy ” or “ advance harmful , false , or misleading narratives ” about vaccines .
“ Using a combination of technology and human review , we will begin enforcing this updated policy on December 21 , and expanding our actions during the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Twitter added that it will be monitoring posts about vaccinations “ in close consultation with local , national , and global public health authorities around the world.
” The tech company will also wipe any posts that suggest vaccines “ are used to intentionally cause harm , ” or “ control populations , ” or are “ unnecessary.
” The statement also notes that posts will be scrubbed if they contain “ false claims which have been widely debunked about the adverse impacts or effects of receiving vaccinations.
” Exactly what “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Presumably it means any claims about vaccines that Twitter disagrees with .
The New York Times and others reported Wednesday that healthcare workers in Alaska have been hospitalized with a serious allergic reaction after taking Pfizer ’ s Covid-19 vaccine .
The development follows reports last week from Britain where some healthcare workers reported serious allergic reactions to the vaccine , prompting Britain ’ s medical regulator to issue a warning people with a history of allergies not to take the shot .
There is a mountain of documented evidence that some vaccines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and compared to previous vaccines , the coronavirus shot is relatively untested , indeed six people even DIED during the rush to develop it .
Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) regulators also revealed that some people who got Pfizer ’ s coronavirus vaccine during its trial have since developed Bell ’ s palsy , a form of facial paralysis .
Both the US and UK governments have rolled out technology specifically to monitor adverse effects of the vaccine , because they know there will be many , many cases .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ any suggestion the shot could cause damage will be met with strict censorship .
Where it can not prove something has been “ debunked ” and remove the post entirely , Twitter says it intends to attach “ warning ” labels to tweets that “ advance unsubstantiated rumours , disputed claims , as well as incomplete or out-of-context information about vaccines.
” Last month , Twitter declared that it will send warnings to everyone who likes a post the company deems to contain “ misleading information ” .

Update (1350ET): The House Judiciary Committee has launched an investigation into a “misinformation” tracking group, the UK’s Center for Countering Digital Hate – which is now being sued by X Corp, formerly Twitter.
According to a letter seen by the Washington Examiner, the Center for Countering Digital Hate is in the crosshairs, as House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) has given the nonprofit until August 17, two weeks, to turn over records that could detail the extent of its ties to the Biden White House.
“We know from the Facebook Files that the Center for Countering Digital Hate was working with the White House to censor speech,” said a senior GOP congressional aide. “But how far did it go? Republicans want to find out, and of course subpoenas are on the table if we don’t get answers.”
Jordan’s letter, which was first obtained by the Washington Examiner, is the latest escalation of the GOP’s efforts to investigate how the federal government has, in some cases, coordinated with the private sector to flag certain speech, including speech related to COVID-19, as “disinformation” or “misinformation.” The chairman has recently been publicizing subpoenaed documents from Facebook, now called Meta, showinghow the platform kept in close contact with the Biden administration on content moderation. Further sets of emails produced in connection to that subpoena, which have not been reported on until now and were shared with the Washington Examiner, shed light on Center for Countering Digital Hate’s influence among top Facebook staffers and the highest levels of government. -Washington Examiner
In April 2021, a Facebook employee cited the CCDH’s March 2021 report titled “The Disinformation Dozen” in an email thread dubbed “Vaccine policy,” in which alleged that there “are twelve anti-vaxxers who play leading roles in spreading digital misinformation about COVID vaccines,” with RFK Jr. being one of them.
“We also continue to see pressure from partners and policymakers, including the White House, to remove entities that are seen to be contributing to a large amount of vaccine misinformation content (commonly referred to as the ‘disinformation dozen’ which CCDH asserts are responsible for 73% of vaccine misinformation on Facebook),” the employee’s email continues.
“We continue to monitor these entities on platform, and are reviewing the off platform as well, but do not believe we currently have a clear path for removal of these.”
In his letter to CCDH’s CEO, Imran Ahmed, Jordan writes: “We are interested in understanding the interactions between the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) and the federal government in particular, as well as between CCDH and social media companies,” adding “CCDH claims that ‘social media companies erode basic human rights and civil liberties by enabling the spread of online hate and disinformation.'”
Earlier Thursday, Jordan dropped a thread of receipts on Facebook’s relationship with the Biden regime and how they censored unfavorable opinions.
THE FACEBOOK FILES PART 3.
Newly subpoenaed internal notes of meetings between Facebook executives and Biden Admin officials reveal more about the lengths the Biden White House wanted to go to control true speech on Facebook.
🧵 Thread: https://t.co/AeXrs1U8wr — Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) August 3, 2023
As we’ve previously noted (via Paul Thacker)
The Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) sprang out of nowhere in late 2017 or early 2018. At the time, Ahmed was leaving a job as a political advisor to members of the British Labour Party and had just written a book. As we chronicle in our just published book The New Serfdom, the dominance of market fundamentalism has been a disastrous experiment that has ripped up social cohesion and solidarity while the gap between the 1 per cent and the 99 per cent has soared to levels not seen since the beginning of the last century. Home ownership, secure employment and fair wages seem like relics of a bygone era. Meanwhile exploitative workplace practices have created a new serfdom leaving many people trapped in insecure, unfulfilling and underpaid work with no escape route. How this background as a political operative prepared Ahmed to brand himself as an expert in disinformation is unclear. His LinkedIn account makes no mention of his work as a political operative in England, although his biography at CCDH states that he is an “authority on social and psychological malignancies on social media, such as identity-based hate, extremism, disinformation, and conspiracy theories.” Ahmed now lives in Washington DC and his organization does not provide a list of funders. In early 2021, CCDH posted a report titled “The Disinformation Dozen” that alleged the majority of COVID vaccine disinformation came from just 12 accounts, including Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Ahmed released the report just as the Biden administration began their COVID vaccine rollout and shortly before the House held hearings on disinformation at social media companies.
Good question. This appears to be foreign government interference.
Can’t wait to get their donors under deposition! — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 31, 2023
And of course, now the CCDH has their cup out for donations.
CCDH who is known for silencing people including orgs like @FDRLST and @zerohedge are now using the @elonmusk lawsuit to get donations crying about how Elon is “silencing them” and it’s “straight out of the authoritarian handbook” ….This is unbelievable. 🙄 pic.twitter.com/EiWdZA42j8 — Natalie F Danelishen (@Chesschick01) August 3, 2023
* * *
Update (1253ET): Shortly after publication, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) dropped a Twitter thread full of receipts showing the Biden administration’s collusion with Facebook to suppress conservative speech.
“Since it’s a global pandemic, can we give agencies access to targeting parameters that they normally wouldn’t be able to?” said President Biden’s digital director, Rob Flaherty, according to internal company communications.
Rob Flaherty, President Biden’s then-Director of Digital Strategy, repeatedly put pressure on Facebook to explain its content decisions.
“We have to explain to President, Ron, people, why there is misinfo on the internet…” pic.twitter.com/zUZYbKHfA9 — Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) August 3, 2023
Continued…For example, Flaherty questioned whether Facebook was doing enough to reduce traffic from sites like the @nypost. “I’m curious – NY Post churning out articles every day… What is supposed to happen to that from Policy perspective. Does that article get a reduction, labels?”
But that wasn’t enough for the Biden White House. Flaherty wanted Facebook to go a step further. He wanted Facebook to kick people off its site.
The Biden White House’s effort to censor opposing viewpoints only grew. So, they upped the pressure. Flaherty demanded that Facebook “play ball” and work with the Biden White House on censorship. He called it his “dream.”
But that’s not all. The Biden White House wanted to control what you saw on Facebook. They questioned whether Facebook could change its algorithm so users saw more posts from the New York Times and less from the @realDailyWireand @TomiLahren.
Why did they do that? Because they didn’t think you were smart enough to decide for yourself. President Biden’s head of strategic communications and public engagement for the #COVID19 response, Courtney Rowe, mocked Real America’s ability to determine what’s true and what isn’t.
Facebook knew it had to act. One employee tried to explain to the White House that if the company couldn’t “remove” content, it could at least “contain it.”
But Flaherty continued to press for more content moderation and CONTROL on so-called “bad” content.
And of course, Facebook caved. The company ADMITTED to the White House that it reduced content of certain posts – even if the posts didn’t violate the company’s terms and contained TRUE information. Just read this from a Facebook employee.
These newly subpoenaed meeting notes continue to show the Biden White House’s desire to direct and control content on Facebook. More evidence of the censorship-industrial complex. To be continued…
* * *
Authored by Eric Lundrum via American Greatness,
In new memos recently released by Facebook, the social media giant was pressured by the Biden White House into altering its algorithms so that mainstream news sources would be elevated over conservative sites.
As Just The News reports, the documents over to the House Judiciary Committee following a subpoena detail a series of meetings between Facebook executives and White House Digital Director Rob Flaherty in the spring of 2021. The demands from the White House focused on posts related to the Chinese coronavirus and the efficiency of the COVID vaccines.
In one meeting on April 14th, 2021, Flaherty asked Facebook if it was possible to artificially promote outlets such as the New York Times and the Washington Post, instead the Daily Wire and Fox News, particularly commentator Tomi Lahren.
“If you were to change the algorithm so that people were more likely to see NYT, WSJ, any authoritative news source over Daily Wire, Tomi Lahren, polarizing people,” Flaherty asked.
“You wouldn’t have a mechanism to check the material impact?”
“We have to explain to President, Ron [Klain], people, why there is misinfo on the internet, bigger problem than FB,” said Flaherty, according to the typed notes from Facebook executives.
“Where issues are, what interventions are, how well they are working, for products, want to engage in things that you know to be effective. I don’t even care about specific methodology, you have better, richer data than we’ll ever have.”
Tomi Lahren, who boasted a large following on Facebook, had recently announced that she would refuse to get the COVID vaccine. Meanwhile, Daily Wire had filed a lawsuit against the Biden Administration’s mandate for private workplaces to force its employees to take the vaccine. The Supreme Court eventually struck down Biden’s workplace mandate, while upholding his vaccine mandate for facilities that are funded by Medicare and Medicaid.
“What are the things driving hesitancy on your platform? What is it? How big is the problem? When you are intervening, how are you measuring success?” Flaherty repeatedly grilled the Facebook executives in one meeting.
“Never-before-released internal documents subpoenaed by the Judiciary Committee PROVE that Facebook and Instagram censored posts and changed their content moderation policies because of unconstitutional pressure from the Biden White House,” said Congressman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, on Twitter.
Constitutional scholars have also raised the alarm over the revelations, with George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley saying that he has “asked Congress to pass a law barring federal employees from engaging in censorship and targeting of citizens.”
“Agencies have a right to speak in their own voices,” Turley added. “Instead, the Biden Administration sought to engage in what I have called ‘censorship through surrogate.’ This is part of that pattern.”
Turley’s take is reiterated by University of Tennessee law professor Glenn Reynolds told Just the News on Wednesday that the First Amendment issue is when the “government is asking people to censor speech, their action is attributable to the government, so both they and the government can be sued.”x
“By working with the government, Facebook exposed themselves to liability,” Reynolds said, noting that they do not “share sovereign immunity” with the government and will “probably very much regret it.”
This post was originally published at Zero Hedge


thelibertydaily--2020-12-17--Study: “Cancel Culture” Decimating Free Speech at World’s Leading Universities

A study by leading education focused think tank Civitas has found that free speech at the world ’ s leading universities is being eroded at an alarming rate owing to the rise of “ cancel culture ” .
The study found that within the past three years , more than 68 per cent of universities in the UK have seen free speech severely restricted , with academics unable to meaningfully discuss the nuances of issues such as race and gender .
The report notes that universities including Oxford , Cambridge and St Andrews , three of the world ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fallen into a “ red ” category for free speech following instances of “ no platforming ” of scheduled speakers .
The study warns that the situation has gotten so severe that it requires government legislation to stop campus censorship at 48 universities , the equivalent of at least 35 per cent of institutions .
Civitas noted that a further 70 institutions , over half , placed into a “ amber category ” , have experienced restrictions on freedom of expression that should be looked into by university watchdog The Office for Students @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ could be curbed by perceived transphobic episodes ” in an alarming number of institutions , and that a “ cancel culture ” of open letters and or petitions from “ external pressure groups ” is eroding free speech .
Lead researcher Jim McConalogue noted “ Our findings suggest that 86 per cent of universities faced either severe or moderate free speech restrictions which need to be addressed.
” “ The fundamental issue must be dealt with because students and academics find themselves in educational institutions in which they can not speak freely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ including on race , gender , the outcomes of elections , their views on religion , or on discrimination itself for fear of judgements that lead to eventual penalty or censorship , ” McConalogue explained .
A previous Civitas report , published last month , found that “ The racialisation of campus relations is driving a wedge between students and undermines any sense of our common humanity ” .
The report also noted that there is no statistical evidence that ‘ ethnicity ’ determines the educational attainment of higher education students : The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prominent incident at Cambridge University , with dons rejecting ‘ authoritarian guidelines ’ from the university that decreed opinions should be “ respectful of the diverse identities of others ” .
Academics instead said they will promote ‘ tolerance ’ of differing opinions , and are backing amendments to make it more difficult for public speakers to be ‘ no-platformed ’ based on their beliefs and opinions .
In one particular incident , some students at Clare College , Cambridge , attempted to get a city councillor ( who is also a porter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to support a pro-trans motion .
The decimation of free speech at universities has become so severe that the Education Secretary Gavin Williamson announced earlier this year that stamping out ‘ no platforming ’ was a top priority .
Williamson has warned that legislation for new laws against censorship will have to be introduced if the trend continues .


thelibertydaily--2020-12-17--Unconstitutional? Democrat Wisconsin City Election Officials Sought Private Money to Register Voters

City officials in Green Bay , Wis. , solicited private money from a voter advocacy group backed by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg , pledging they would use some of the $ 1 million grant to run registration campaigns and conduct outreach to `` underrepresented '' minority voters , according to memos obtained by Just the News through an open records request .
`` [ W ] e ’ d like to reach out to the Hmong , Somali and Spanish-speaking communities with targeted mail , geo-fencing , posters ( billboards ) , radio , television and streaming service PSAs , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ texts , as well as voter-navigators , '' the city 's grant questionnaire to the Center for Tech and Civic Life stated .
`` We could also employ our voter navigators to have town halls , registration drives in trusted locations and conduct virtual events , '' the questionnaire added .
Legal experts and Wisconsin GOP officials said Wednesday the grant arrangement appeared to put city election officials in the business of conducting partisan activities like get-out-the-vote efforts and registrations usually reserved for political parties and candidates .
They added it possibly violated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by targeting only certain ethnic communities deemed favorable to Democrats .
`` Using private funds to have government workers implement voter registration drives — that should be done by political groups — is an ethical concern , '' Wisconsin GOP chairman Andrew Hitt told Just the News .
`` And the fact that they initially offered this money to Democrat cities , to target Democrat constituencies , sheds more light on their actual intentions.
” Phill Kline , head of the Thomas More Society 's AMistad Project that has filed lawsuits in several @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , said the grant application suggested private money was used to `` fund partisan political activity by local election officials .
Such conduct violates equal protection and federal law .
Such private interests must not be in the voting booth or the counting room . ''
When the Center approved a grant for $ 1,094,400 grant for the fall election to Green Bay , it included the requirement to `` dramatically expand voter & community education & outreach , particularly to historically disenfranchised residents , '' suggesting a target of 20,000 new registered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ might help residents get the official documents needed to register .
`` It would require both considerable staff time to construct that list of residents and directly mail a professionally-designed piece ( in multiple languages ) to those voters .
( $ 50,000 total for staffing , design , printing , and postage ) .
To assist new voters , the City would also like resources to help residents obtain required documents ( i.e .
birth certificates ) which are needed to get a valid state ID needed for voting , '' one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 's grant approval letter stated .
In a section of `` add on questions , '' city officials were asked `` what steps [ they could ] take to register new voters . ''
The city 's mayor , chief of staff and city clerk responded : `` We would ideally like to use voter navigators to work with community groups to identify and register voters . ''
Amaad Rivera , a spokesman for Green Bay Mayor Eric Gengrich 's office , told Just the News on Wednesday that city officials never held @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Rather , the city engaged in what he said was `` voter education '' efforts throughout the election year .
That distinction conflicted with the terms contained in the Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan , a document submitted to CTCL by the mayors of Milwaukee , Madison , Green Bay , Kenosha , and Racine , all urban Democrat strongholds .
The cities in that proposal said they were seeking funds to engage in `` voter outreach and education , '' which the document said would involve efforts to `` encourage and explain new @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said that `` significant resources are needed for all five municipalities to ... encourage and facilitate new voter registration and registration updates . ''
Rivera did not respond to a followup email asking for clarification on those proposals .
Asked earlier about `` voter navigators '' who would help `` community groups '' in their voter registration efforts , Rivera said that term refers to municipal employees `` who helped people answer questions such as , what forms of ID work ?
What are the early vote rules ?
If I have a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ '' The Center for Tech and Civic Life , which ultimately distributed $ 6.3 million to the Wisconsin cities , did not respond to a query on Wednesday regarding the funds .
CTCL made headlines earlier in the year when it received what ended up being more than a third of a billion dollars from Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan that it planned to use to `` help ensure that [ local jurisdictions ] have the staffing , training , and equipment necessary '' to conduct the 2020 election .
That infusion occurred after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cities .
In the U.S. , get-out-the-vote campaigns and voter registration drives are overwhelmingly the province of nonprofit groups and political campaigns rather than government authorities , though municipal authorities , including in Wisconsin , have at times undertaken voting outreach and registration efforts , as Milwaukee County was doing prior to the pandemic this year .
Yet the documents offer further evidence that the major cash infusion from the CTCL into Wisconsin politics was intended in part to allow municipal authorities to proactively boost voter numbers in Democratic strongholds in the state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ officially certified with Joe Biden holding a razor-thin 20,000-vote lead , even narrower than Trump 's victory there in 2016 .

City officials in Green Bay, Wis., solicited private money from a voter advocacy group backed by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, pledging they would use some of the $1 million grant to run registration campaigns and conduct outreach to "underrepresented" minority voters, according to memos obtained by Just the News through an open records request.
"[W]e’d like to reach out to the Hmong, Somali and Spanish-speaking communities with targeted mail, geo-fencing, posters (billboards), radio, television and streaming service PSAs, digital advertising, robo calls and robo texts, as well as voter-navigators," the city's grant questionnaire to the Center for Tech and Civic Life stated.
"We could also employ our voter navigators to have town halls, registration drives in trusted locations and conduct virtual events," the questionnaire added.
Legal experts and Wisconsin GOP officials said Wednesday the grant arrangement appeared to put city election officials in the business of conducting partisan activities like get-out-the-vote efforts and registrations usually reserved for political parties and candidates. They added it possibly violated the equal protection clause of the Constitution by targeting only certain ethnic communities deemed favorable to Democrats.
"Using private funds to have government workers implement voter registration drives — that should be done by political groups — is an ethical concern," Wisconsin GOP chairman Andrew Hitt told Just the News. "And the fact that they initially offered this money to Democrat cities, to target Democrat constituencies, sheds more light on their actual intentions.”
Phill Kline, head of the Thomas More Society's AMistad Project that has filed lawsuits in several states challenging irregularities in the 2020 election, said the grant application suggested private money was used to "fund partisan political activity by local election officials. Such conduct violates equal protection and federal law. Such private interests must not be in the voting booth or the counting room."
When the Center approved a grant for $1,094,400 grant for the fall election to Green Bay, it included the requirement to "dramatically expand voter & community education & outreach, particularly to historically disenfranchised residents," suggesting a target of 20,000 new registered voters. It even suggested city officials might help residents get the official documents needed to register.
"It would require both considerable staff time to construct that list of residents and directly mail a professionally-designed piece (in multiple languages) to those voters. ($50,000 total for staffing, design, printing, and postage). To assist new voters, the City would also like resources to help residents obtain required documents (i.e. birth certificates) which are needed to get a valid state ID needed for voting," one of the documents attached to the Center's grant approval letter stated.
In a section of "add on questions," city officials were asked "what steps [they could] take to register new voters."
The city's mayor, chief of staff and city clerk responded: "We would ideally like to use voter navigators to work with community groups to identify and register voters."
Amaad Rivera, a spokesman for Green Bay Mayor Eric Gengrich's office, told Just the News on Wednesday that city officials never held any voter registration drives this year. Rather, the city engaged in what he said was "voter education" efforts throughout the election year.
That distinction conflicted with the terms contained in the Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan, a document submitted to CTCL by the mayors of Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, Kenosha, and Racine, all urban Democrat strongholds. The cities in that proposal said they were seeking funds to engage in "voter outreach and education," which the document said would involve efforts to "encourage and explain new voter registration." The plan also said that "significant resources are needed for all five municipalities to ... encourage and facilitate new voter registration and registration updates."
Rivera did not respond to a followup email asking for clarification on those proposals. Asked earlier about "voter navigators" who would help "community groups" in their voter registration efforts, Rivera said that term refers to municipal employees "who helped people answer questions such as, what forms of ID work? What are the early vote rules? If I have a disability, what can I do?"
The Center for Tech and Civic Life, which ultimately distributed $6.3 million to the Wisconsin cities, did not respond to a query on Wednesday regarding the funds.
CTCL made headlines earlier in the year when it received what ended up being more than a third of a billion dollars from Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan that it planned to use to "help ensure that [local jurisdictions] have the staffing, training, and equipment necessary" to conduct the 2020 election. That infusion occurred after CTCL's multimillion-dollar grant to the Wisconsin cities.
In the U.S., get-out-the-vote campaigns and voter registration drives are overwhelmingly the province of nonprofit groups and political campaigns rather than government authorities, though municipal authorities, including in Wisconsin, have at times undertaken voting outreach and registration efforts, as Milwaukee County was doing prior to the pandemic this year.
Yet the documents offer further evidence that the major cash infusion from the CTCL into Wisconsin politics was intended in part to allow municipal authorities to proactively boost voter numbers in Democratic strongholds in the state, critics say. Wisconsin has been officially certified with Joe Biden holding a razor-thin 20,000-vote lead, even narrower than Trump's victory there in 2016.


thelibertydaily--2020-12-17--Jenna Ellis: The Presidential Election ‘Was Stolen From President Trump’

Trump campaign senior legal advisor and attorney for President Trump Jenna Ellis said that the presidential election `` was stolen from President Trump '' and that this must be remedied and prevented from ever occurring again in the U.S. During an interview on the John Solomon Reports podcast Ellis said she believes `` the more that we continue to get to the bottom of this , '' the nation is seeing the amount of `` corruption and complete lawlessness '' that tainted the election and people are calling for `` answers '' and `` accountability . ''
During the interview @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the 2020 election , `` we have to make sure that in every single one of the 50 states the state legislatures are looking very seriously at election integrity ... and they will put reasonable constitutionally appropriate safeguards to make sure that the will of the American people is not disenfranchised . ''
President Trump has not conceded to Biden in the presidential election contest .
He and others have alleged that the election was contaminated by fraud .
Ellis noted that she hopes `` the state legislatures will seriously do their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ make sure that their voters are not disenfranchised , and they will send the correct delegates to the Electoral College . ''
Earlier this week during Electoral College voting Joe Biden got more than the 270 electoral votes required to win a presidential contest .
The votes will be counted during a joint session of Congress on Jan. 6 presided over by Vice President Mike Pence .
Republican electors in some states cast conditional votes for President Trump , though this did not impact the official Electoral College vote : `` We took @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claims that may be presented going forward , '' Pennsylvania chair of the Trump campaign Bernie Comfort said .
`` This was in no way an effort to usurp or contest the will of the Pennsylvania voters . ''
Regarding the issue of the Republican electors in some states , Ellis said that `` they still are the appropriate delegates under Trump and they absolutely can cast their vote when the false certifications ultimately , hopefully will not matter because they are false . ''

Trump campaign senior legal advisor and attorney for President Trump Jenna Ellis said that the presidential election "was stolen from President Trump" and that this must be remedied and prevented from ever occurring again in the U.S.
During an interview on the John Solomon Reports podcast Ellis said she believes "the more that we continue to get to the bottom of this," the nation is seeing the amount of "corruption and complete lawlessness" that tainted the election and people are calling for "answers" and "accountability."
During the interview Ellis said that whatever the ultimate outcome of the 2020 election, "we have to make sure that in every single one of the 50 states the state legislatures are looking very seriously at election integrity...and they will put reasonable constitutionally appropriate safeguards to make sure that the will of the American people is not disenfranchised."
President Trump has not conceded to Biden in the presidential election contest. He and others have alleged that the election was contaminated by fraud.
Ellis noted that she hopes "the state legislatures will seriously do their constitutionally delegated job, which is to make sure that their voters are not disenfranchised, and they will send the correct delegates to the Electoral College."
Earlier this week during Electoral College voting Joe Biden got more than the 270 electoral votes required to win a presidential contest. The votes will be counted during a joint session of Congress on Jan. 6 presided over by Vice President Mike Pence.
Republican electors in some states cast conditional votes for President Trump, though this did not impact the official Electoral College vote: "We took this procedural vote to preserve any legal claims that may be presented going forward," Pennsylvania chair of the Trump campaign Bernie Comfort said. "This was in no way an effort to usurp or contest the will of the Pennsylvania voters."
Regarding the issue of the Republican electors in some states, Ellis said that "they still are the appropriate delegates under Trump and they absolutely can cast their vote when the false certifications ultimately, hopefully will not matter because they are false."


thelibertydaily--2020-12-17--CNN’s Boosterism of Biden’s Church Attendance Undermined by Embarrassing Correction

CNN 's energetic switch from Trump Derangement to Biden Exceptionalism runs roughshod over their supposed devotion to `` Facts First . ''
On Sunday , reporters Michael Warren and Arlette Saenz blatantly boosted Joe Biden as a man of devout faith , touting he would be the only president in decades to attend church .
Decades ?
Really ?
Did CNN not remember that President George W. Bush was well known as a very religious man who attended church ?
Oops !
Well , apparently somebody pointed out that obvious fact overlooked by CNN and they updated their story which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Catholic faith will be on full display as the first churchgoing president in decades '' to add in the lame caveat `` publicly '' so it now reads `` Biden 's Catholic faith will be on full display as the first publicly churchgoing president in decades . ''
In addition an equally lame correction was provided to the story : Therefore the correction pretty much upended the entire premise of the story .
Oh , and lamely adding `` publicly '' to the title really does n't change its premise .
Despite it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden , the real target of the story is in the third paragraph : That 's a level of devotion to regular religious services not seen from recent presidents , who were professed Christians but intermittently attended church or worshipped privately while in office .
Donald Trump has not had a habit of attending church services weekly , though he made several appearances at the Episcopal church in West Palm Beach near his resort as well as at various evangelical churches across the country .
In contrast to Trump , the CNN writers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ devout church-goer .
But for Biden , who next month will become the second Catholic president in US history , attending weekly Mass is expected to be a fixed part of his schedule .
And while it 's unclear whether he will adopt a permanent parish in Washington during his term , Biden 's churchgoing will not only provide a window into his spiritual side .
It will also be core to his political brand -- apparent not just in the pursuit of his policy agenda but even in his schedule as President @ @ @ @ @ @ @ both a private devotion -- he prays regularly , he goes to church .
But it 's also public .
He 's open about and proud that he 's a Catholic , '' said Fr .
Kevin O'Brien , a friend and spiritual adviser to Biden and his wife Jill .
It took 19 paragraphs for CNN to acknowledge that Biden 's devout support for abortion and contraception are at odds with his church 's teaching , and that he nominated Xavier Becerra to run Health and Human Services , a man who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contraception for their employees .
But hey , Pope Francis called to congratulate him , so only the `` conservatives '' have a problem .
Yes , Biden is such a devout churchgoer that despite his regular attendance somehow missed the proper way to pronounce `` psalm '' after hearing it repeated from the pulpit on a frequent basis .

CNN's energetic switch from Trump Derangement to Biden Exceptionalism runs roughshod over their supposed devotion to "Facts First."
On Sunday, reporters Michael Warren and Arlette Saenz blatantly boosted Joe Biden as a man of devout faith, touting he would be the only president in decades to attend church. Decades? Really? Did CNN not remember that President George W. Bush was well known as a very religious man who attended church?
Oops! Well, apparently somebody pointed out that obvious fact overlooked by CNN and they updated their story which was originally titled, "Biden's Catholic faith will be on full display as the first churchgoing president in decades" to add in the lame caveat "publicly" so it now reads "Biden's Catholic faith will be on full display as the first publicly churchgoing president in decades."
In addition an equally lame correction was provided to the story:
CORRECTION: An earlier version of the headline and this story understated how often past presidents have attended church services. President George W. Bush attended church at Camp David and intermittently in Washington, DC, and Texas.
Therefore the correction pretty much upended the entire premise of the story. Oh, and lamely adding "publicly" to the title really doesn't change its premise.
Despite it supposedly being about the "devout" Biden, the real target of the story is in the third paragraph:
That's a level of devotion to regular religious services not seen from recent presidents, who were professed Christians but intermittently attended church or worshipped privately while in office. Donald Trump has not had a habit of attending church services weekly, though he made several appearances at the Episcopal church in West Palm Beach near his resort as well as at various evangelical churches across the country.
In contrast to Trump, the CNN writers emphasize that Biden is a regular and devout church-goer.
But for Biden, who next month will become the second Catholic president in US history, attending weekly Mass is expected to be a fixed part of his schedule. And while it's unclear whether he will adopt a permanent parish in Washington during his term, Biden's churchgoing will not only provide a window into his spiritual side. It will also be core to his political brand -- apparent not just in the pursuit of his policy agenda but even in his schedule as President. "For Joe, faith is both a private devotion -- he prays regularly, he goes to church. But it's also public. He's open about and proud that he's a Catholic," said Fr. Kevin O'Brien, a friend and spiritual adviser to Biden and his wife Jill.
It took 19 paragraphs for CNN to acknowledge that Biden's devout support for abortion and contraception are at odds with his church's teaching, and that he nominated Xavier Becerra to run Health and Human Services, a man who sued nuns to force them to fund contraception for their employees. But hey, Pope Francis called to congratulate him, so only the "conservatives" have a problem.
Yes, Biden is such a devout churchgoer that despite his regular attendance somehow missed the proper way to pronounce "psalm" after hearing it repeated from the pulpit on a frequent basis.


thelibertydaily--2020-12-17--Commiefornia “Health” Secretary Admits That Outdoor Dining Closures Were to Keep People Home, and No

Commiefornia “Health” Secretary Admits That Outdoor Dining Closures Were to Keep People Home, and Not Because Restaurants Were Spreading the Chi-Com Virus

California Health Secretary Dr. Mark Ghaly said in a video announcement on Wednesday that the lockdown rules in the state preventing outdoor dining are not a tool for safety , but rather a tactic to `` keep people at home . ''
`` Turning to restaurants to deliver and provide takeout options instead really has to do with the goal of trying to keep people at home , '' Ghaly said .
`` Not a comment on the relative safety of outdoor dining . ''
Ghaly commented on the extensive steps which restaurants have taken with the government to make @ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` keeping tables farther apart , to ensuring masking happens as much as possible , to create opportunities for air circulation . ''
He pointed out `` all of those factors make outdoor dining lower risk . ''
`` But right now , '' Ghaly continued , `` we advise against anything that you can do in another way , in a lower risk way , that avoids you either leaving your home , or only leaving your home in a way that does n't expose you and cause you to mix with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have come under extensive criticism by conservatives who have suggested that the restrictions put in place are arbitrary and draconian , while Democrats have mostly , although in Ghaly 's case not always , argued that they are necessary steps to prevent the spread of coronavirus .
Conservatives have also pointed the fact that some state officials and healthcare profession leaders , who have strongly supported lockdown measures , have flaunted the rules themselves .
California Governor Gavin Newsom was photographed in November dining at a lavish restaurant in Napa , California with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a time when his own orders restricted such gatherings .

California Health Secretary Dr. Mark Ghaly said in a video announcement on Wednesday that the lockdown rules in the state preventing outdoor dining are not a tool for safety, but rather a tactic to "keep people at home."
"Turning to restaurants to deliver and provide takeout options instead really has to do with the goal of trying to keep people at home," Ghaly said. "Not a comment on the relative safety of outdoor dining."
Ghaly commented on the extensive steps which restaurants have taken with the government to make outdoor dining as safe as possible including "keeping tables farther apart, to ensuring masking happens as much as possible, to create opportunities for air circulation." He pointed out "all of those factors make outdoor dining lower risk."
"But right now," Ghaly continued, "we advise against anything that you can do in another way, in a lower risk way, that avoids you either leaving your home, or only leaving your home in a way that doesn't expose you and cause you to mix with others."
California's lockdown rules have come under extensive criticism by conservatives who have suggested that the restrictions put in place are arbitrary and draconian, while Democrats have mostly, although in Ghaly's case not always, argued that they are necessary steps to prevent the spread of coronavirus.
Conservatives have also pointed the fact that some state officials and healthcare profession leaders, who have strongly supported lockdown measures, have flaunted the rules themselves. California Governor Gavin Newsom was photographed in November dining at a lavish restaurant in Napa, California with a small group of people even at a time when his own orders restricted such gatherings.


thelibertydaily--2020-12-17--Antifa Prepares to Defend Former Autonomous Zone in Seattle Where CHAZ Once Stood

Antifa activists have prepared to defend the former Seattle autonomous zone against police—the same area where the notorious Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone was established during the summer months .
Ahead of an anticipated homeless encampment sweep at Cal Anderson Park in the Capitol Hill neighborhood scheduled for 7:30 a.m. Wednesday morning , insurgents barricaded the park ’ s perimeter .
Anti-police and anarchist graffiti covered the fencing .
One message read : “ Marry Lenin , F— Biden.
” Organizers dropped off wooden pallets in pick-up trucks to build their makeshift walls to keep city crews out during Wednesday ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to clear out but many refused to evacuate .
Entrances were blocked at Pine Street and 11th Avenue .
Five entries in total were blockaded , The Post Millennial ’ s Seattle correspondent Ari Hoffman reported at the scene .
A fire was intentionally set to a homeless tent with several fireworks inside .
The city has postponed the expected sweep while the parks department is assessing the site and preparing for a multi-day `` intensive maintenance and cleaning , ” KING 5 News reported .
According to Seattle Parks , recent maintenance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of physical violence , ” requiring the department to request police assistance .
Overnight , black bloc protesters threw rocks at local reporters who were forced to abandon their live shot of the park .
“ Now I know how @ SeattlePD feels .
My crew is safe .
@ SeattleParks will have hands full during Wed sweep , ” KOMO News journalist Jonathan Choe wrote on Twitter .
An additional Q13 News crew was harassed by the park occupants Wednesday morning , as was anyone passing by snapping pictures of the barriers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the incident at Portland ’ s Red House Autonomous Zone ( RHAZ ) where KATU-TV reporters were surrounded and assaulted by Antifa militants when they attempted to film inside the occupied space .
In September , the Seattle Police Department protected the Seattle Parks Department while they dismantled the homeless encampment that had grown in Cal Anderson Park since the end of the infamous Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone .
According to SPD , officers providing security during a Seattle Parks Department cleanup at Cal Anderson Park `` ... recovered homemade spike strips , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of tents in the area . ''
At the time , activists at the park and on social media spent the day berating SPD for the cleanup claiming that they were just there to `` feed the homeless . ''
Similarly , activists claimed this week that they are there to `` protect the homeless . ''
Yet witnesses Wednesday afternoon reported hearing electric drills , saws , and other tools being used in the park .
The previous stockpile calls into question if Antifa is using the place again as a base @ @ @ @ @ @ @ homeless encampments in the park have led to an increase in crime in the park and the neighborhood , most notably a gruesome murder/suicide in September , allegedly by known homeless prolific offender Travis Berge .
Nearby businesses and residents have since signed a petition in support of the encampment sweep .
Multiple Antifa accounts are now blacklisting those companies and individuals , listing names , titles , and addresses .

Antifa activists have prepared to defend the former Seattle autonomous zone against police—the same area where the notorious Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone was established during the summer months.
Ahead of an anticipated homeless encampment sweep at Cal Anderson Park in the Capitol Hill neighborhood scheduled for 7:30 a.m. Wednesday morning, insurgents barricaded the park’s perimeter. Anti-police and anarchist graffiti covered the fencing. One message read: “Marry Lenin, F— Biden.”
Not Biden fans for sure pic.twitter.com/J0feeQT7eU — Nikki West (@Nikki__West) December 16, 2020
Organizers dropped off wooden pallets in pick-up trucks to build their makeshift walls to keep city crews out during Wednesday’s planned sweep.
TRASHED: Here’s another entrance at Cal Anderson Park. Saw people dropping off wooden pallets in pick up trucks. Clearly building make shift wall to keep city crews out during Wednesday’s planned sweep. #seattle #CapitolHill #CalAndersonPark pic.twitter.com/qmfd2bNJyt — Jonathan Choe Journalist KOMO News (@choeshow) December 15, 2020
Squatters were told to clear out but many refused to evacuate. Entrances were blocked at Pine Street and 11th Avenue.
Workers with the city of Seattle are expected to clear the encampment at Cal Anderson Park at 7:30 this morning. They have been told to clear out and many have refused. People coming out of the camp have blocked the entrance at Pine Street and 11th Avenue. pic.twitter.com/jwXGc1fVrz — Kierra Elfalan (@KierraElfalanTV) December 16, 2020
Five entries in total were blockaded, The Post Millennial’s Seattle correspondent Ari Hoffman reported at the scene.
Antifa and activists are hunkering down at Cal Anderson Park in anticipation of SPD clearning the encampment.
Yesterday, they were just protecting their staging area for riots. Now it seems like they are making an effort to barricade the whole park pic.twitter.com/Akt88iQyaE — Ari Hoffman (Parler: AriHoffman) (@thehoffather) December 16, 2020
A fire was intentionally set to a homeless tent with several fireworks inside.
Happening now at Cal Anderson. Intentional fire set in a tent with some fireworks inside. No injuries. pic.twitter.com/Wdq0aMM3G9 — Alex Garland (@AGarlandPhoto) December 16, 2020
The city has postponed the expected sweep while the parks department is assessing the site and preparing for a multi-day "intensive maintenance and cleaning,” KING 5 News reported.
According to Seattle Parks, recent maintenance efforts "have been met with threats of physical violence,” requiring the department to request police assistance.
Overnight, black bloc protesters threw rocks at local reporters who were forced to abandon their live shot of the park. “Now I know how @SeattlePD feels. My crew is safe. @SeattleParks will have hands full during Wed sweep,” KOMO News journalist Jonathan Choe wrote on Twitter.
An additional Q13 News crew was harassed by the park occupants Wednesday morning, as was anyone passing by snapping pictures of the barriers.
ABANDONING LIVE SHOT: A group of people in all black emerged out of Cal Anderson Park just before my 4:30pm live shot. They started throwing rocks at us. Now I know how @SeattlePD feels. My crew is safe. @SeattleParks will have hands full during Wed sweep. Update 6pm @komonews pic.twitter.com/3A9sExBGyf — Jonathan Choe Journalist KOMO News (@choeshow) December 16, 2020
The violent confrontation appeared to emulate the incident at Portland’s Red House Autonomous Zone (RHAZ) where KATU-TV reporters were surrounded and assaulted by Antifa militants when they attempted to film inside the occupied space.
In September, the Seattle Police Department protected the Seattle Parks Department while they dismantled the homeless encampment that had grown in Cal Anderson Park since the end of the infamous Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone.
According to SPD, officers providing security during a Seattle Parks Department cleanup at Cal Anderson Park "...recovered homemade spike strips, weapons and dozens of makeshift shields inside of tents in the area."
At the time, activists at the park and on social media spent the day berating SPD for the cleanup claiming that they were just there to "feed the homeless." Similarly, activists claimed this week that they are there to "protect the homeless." Yet witnesses Wednesday afternoon reported hearing electric drills, saws, and other tools being used in the park. The previous stockpile calls into question if Antifa is using the place again as a base and the homeless for cover.
The homeless encampments in the park have led to an increase in crime in the park and the neighborhood, most notably a gruesome murder/suicide in September, allegedly by known homeless prolific offender Travis Berge.
Thread: According to sources this is the suspect in tonight's "incident" in Cal Anderson Park that is being investigated as a homicide Travis Berge from @komonews Seattle is dying 'fame' pic.twitter.com/VOTRnjAC3H — Ari Hoffman (Parler: AriHoffman) (@thehoffather) September 17, 2020
Nearby businesses and residents have since signed a petition in support of the encampment sweep. Multiple Antifa accounts are now blacklisting those companies and individuals, listing names, titles, and addresses.


thelibertydaily--2020-12-17--Beijing Biden Claims to Be ‘Confident’ Son Hunter Did Nothing Wrong Despite Federal Probe

The last we heard from President-elect Joe Biden about his son Hunter ’ s business involvements was that they “ don ’ t discuss ” business matters .
We have since come to find out that is not the case , and Biden and the Obama administration were warned about Hunter ’ s gigs .
The mainstream media still seems to find all of Hunter ’ s business irrelevant , and Joe Biden ’ s unethical involvement with any of it , even more so .
Fox News reporter Peter Doocy was able to actually ask the elder Biden his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ; something no other news networks or journalists have cared to do .
Asked whether or not he is confident his son did nothing wrong , Joe Biden responded , “ I ’ m confident.
” Last week Hunter publicly revealed his “ tax affairs ” were being investigated by federal prosecutors .
In a statement , he defended his actions saying , “ I take this matter very seriously but I am confident that a professional and objective review of these matters will demonstrate that I handled my affairs legally and appropriately @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tax advisors.
” Oddly enough , Hunter ’ s statement was released by the transition organization for his father Joe Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris .
In a simultaneously released statement , the transition team stated the elder Biden is “ proud of his son.
” All of the statements on earth could be released , but that does not change the fact that Joe Biden was dishonest about having any knowledge of Hunter ’ s business conduct .
In a 2017 email obtained by Fox News , evidence shows Hunter requested @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , along with his uncle , Jim Biden , for space he planned to share with an ‘ emissary ’ for a chairman of a now-bankrupt Chinese energy company.
” In another email , “ Biden wrote to the same Chinese energy company ’ s chairman extending ‘ best wishes from the entire Biden family , ’ and urging the chairman to ‘ quickly ’ send a $ 10 million wire to ‘ properly fund and operate ’ the Biden joint venture with the company ” reports Fox News .

The last we heard from President-elect Joe Biden about his son Hunter’s business involvements was that they “don’t discuss” business matters. We have since come to find out that is not the case, and Biden and the Obama administration were warned about Hunter’s gigs. The mainstream media still seems to find all of Hunter’s business irrelevant, and Joe Biden’s unethical involvement with any of it, even more so.
Fox News reporter Peter Doocy was able to actually ask the elder Biden his (current) thoughts on the matter; something no other news networks or journalists have cared to do. Asked whether or not he is confident his son did nothing wrong, Joe Biden responded, “I’m confident.”
Last week Hunter publicly revealed his “tax affairs” were being investigated by federal prosecutors. In a statement, he defended his actions saying, “I take this matter very seriously but I am confident that a professional and objective review of these matters will demonstrate that I handled my affairs legally and appropriately, including with the benefit of professional tax advisors.”
Oddly enough, Hunter’s statement was released by the transition organization for his father Joe Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris. In a simultaneously released statement, the transition team stated the elder Biden is “proud of his son.”
All of the statements on earth could be released, but that does not change the fact that Joe Biden was dishonest about having any knowledge of Hunter’s business conduct. In a 2017 email obtained by Fox News, evidence shows Hunter requested keys “for Joe and Jill Biden, along with his uncle, Jim Biden, for space he planned to share with an ‘emissary’ for a chairman of a now-bankrupt Chinese energy company.”
In another email, “Biden wrote to the same Chinese energy company’s chairman extending ‘best wishes from the entire Biden family,’ and urging the chairman to ‘quickly’ send a $10 million wire to ‘properly fund and operate’ the Biden joint venture with the company” reports Fox News.