theduran--2020-12-29--Rhodes Scholars Surge in Biden’s Potential Cabinet

With Trump ’ s ascension to the presidency in 2016 , the Rhodes Scholars that had permeated the U.S .
Deep State over many years found themselves choking on humble pie as they were removed from the drivers ’ seat of world affairs for the first time in decades .
The paradigm of post-nation state unipolarism that had been carefully built up over the post-WWII period had somehow been successfully challenged by an outsider as the republic was slowly returned to its patriotic traditions as a nation committed to non-interventionism , industrial progress and protectionism .
In the last few @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these Oxford-trained Rhodes Scholars have re-emerged as leading voices in Biden ’ s cabinet , and since a general understanding of this problem is so lacking today ( leading many patriots to be duped into believing that the evil Chinese are at the heart of their woes ) , I think some preliminary words are needed as a matter of historical context .
Every year since its creation in 1902 , over 30 talented young American scholars have been rewarded each year with the privilege of an all-expenses paid brainwashing in the halls @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the riches left to posterity by the deceased race patriot diamond magnate Cecil Rhodes before being re-deployed back to their home nations .
Rhodes ’ early disciples included such luminaries as Lord Alfred Milner , Sir Halford Mackinder , George Parkin , W.T .
Stead and the Canadian oligarch Vincent Massey ( to name a few ) .
His early backers included high level figures among the British intelligentsia including Prince Edward Albert and Lord Nathaniel Rothschild who saw that a new strategy was needed to halt the spread of American System policies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Lincoln ’ s victory over the South during the Civil War .
At the time , anyone with half a brain knew that the unipolar days of the British Empire were coming to an end as a new multipolar system of win-win cooperation was emerging… and this was a prospect deemed intolerable by many devout social Darwinists among the British ruling class .
These early Rhodians interfaced closely with London ’ s Fabian Society throughout the 20th century and became the new disciplined elite that gradually infiltrated every branch of society .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ influence in much the same way earlier Jesuit operations had been formed and deployed across Europe beginning in the 16th century .
For anyone confused as to the purpose of this Rhodes Scholarship program , one need look no further than Rhodes ’ 1877 Confessions of Faith and 7 wills which called for domination of the “ inferior races ” to Anglo-Saxon superiority , and the ultimate recapturing of America and the creation of a new Church of the British Empire : “ Let us form the same kind of society , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Empire .
A society which should have its members in every part of the British Empire working with one object and one idea we should have its members placed at our universities and our schools and should watch the English youth passing through their hands just one perhaps in every thousand would have the mind and feelings for such an object , he should be tried in every way , he should be tested whether he is endurant , possessed of eloquence , disregardful of the petty details of life , and if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and bound by oath to serve for the rest of his life in his Country .
He should then be supported if without means by the Society and sent to that part of the Empire where it was felt he was needed.
’ In another will , Rhodes described in more detail his intention : “ To and for the establishment , promotion and development of a Secret Society , the true aim and object whereof shall be for the extension of British rule throughout the world .
The colonization by British subjects @ @ @ @ @ @ @ livelihood are attainable by energy , labour , and enterprise and especially the occupation by British settlers of the entire Continent of Africa , the Holy Land , the Valley of the Euphrates , the islands of Cyprus and Candia , the whole of South America , the islands of the Pacific not heretofore possessed by Great Britain , the whole of the Malay Archipelago , these aboard of China and Japan , [ and ] the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ W.T .
Stead , Rhodes wrote : “ Please remember the key of my idea discussed with you is a Society , copied from the Jesuits as to organisation ” .
As generations passed , the continuity of purpose that transcended individual lives of players on the stage was maintained by certain organizations that grew out of the original Rhodes/Milner Round Table movements and which had branches in every part of the Anglo-Saxon part of the British Empire .
By 1919 after the Round Table had taken control of Canadian and British governments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ group created the Royal Institute for International Affairs ( aka : Chatham House ) .
By 1921 , an American branch was set up called the Council on Foreign Relations ( CFR ) staffed with Rhodes Scholars and Fabians which has maintained a continuity of intention to the present day .
This organization spawned dozens of influential sub organizations which always interface with a form of “ central command ” .
A young student of Harvard ’ s William Yandell Elliot ( himself a Rhodes Scholar who operated the Oxford Branch of Harvard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kissinger who stated gushingly at a May 10 , 1981 Chatham House event : “ The British were so matter-of-factly helpful that they became a participant in internal American deliberations , to a degree probably never practiced between sovereign nations… In my White House incarnation then , I kept the British Foreign Office better informed and more closely engaged than I did the American State Department… It was symptomatic ” .
While the Rhodes Scholar hives managed to permeate ivy league schools , media outlets , private corporations , elected offices and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ laid out by Professor Carrol Quigley ’ s posthumously published The Anglo-American Establishment , the prize of the presidency remained an elusive trophy… until the day that one of Quigley ’ s students returned from Oxford and became Governor of Arkansas .
With Clinton ’ s 1992 presidential victory , Rhodes Scholars like Strobe Talbott ( Assistant Secretary of State and co-architect of Perestroika ) and Robert Reich ( Secretary of Labor ) , were joined by Rhodies Ira Magaziner , Derek Shearer ( Senior Economic Advisors ) , Susan Rice ( Assistant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Kevin Thurme ( Health and Human Services Chief of Staff ) , George Stephanopoulos ( Communications Director ) and dozens of other Rhodes Scholars .
These individuals were funneled into positions of influence aiming to oversee the “ end of history ” celebrated by neocon thinker Francis Fukuyama as the Soviet Union disintegrated .
While some Rhodies remained in positions of power during the period of the Straussian controlled opposition of 2000-2008 , the Rhodes Hives again enjoyed vast policy-shaping influence under the Obama-age where the architecture for one world government was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ states like Libya , Syria and Ukraine .
Despite the set back caused by a populist deplorable who wrestled the reins of power away from these self-professed experts in 2016 , a Rhodie is a stubborn creature if nothing else , and as we have discovered in past months , both Talbott and Rice have been revealed to be two figures at the heart of the Russiagate plot designed to undo the results of 2016 .
While still serving as Brookings Institute President in 2015-17 , it was Talbott who interfaced with MI6 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Steele in the months before the elections by cooking up and circulating the dodgy dossier and it was Rice who was revealed to be at the center of the “ unmasking ” entrapment operation conducted on a bewildered Michael Flynn in January 2017 .
Revenge of Rice and the Rhodies With the recently announced appointment of Susan Rice as director of Biden ’ s Domestic Policy Council , it has become apparent that the Rhodies are drooling at the prospect of correcting the “ aberration ” of Trump by re-ascending to the inner @ @ @ @ @ @ @ droves of Clinton-Obama era unipolar zombies with them .
Beyond Rice , other Rhodes Scholars emerging into positions of control include National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan who graduated from Oxford ’ s Magdalene College and worked under Strobe Talbott at the Brookings Institute ’ s Center for the Study for Globalization at Yale in 2000 .
During this time , Rice had also come to work as Senior Fellow at Brookings followed by a stint as UN Ambassador from 2009-2013 and National Security Advisor from 2013-2017 , while Sullivan went onto become Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Obama years .
Describing her love of Oxford , Rice delivered remarks at Rhodes House in 1999 saying : “ To be at Rhodes House tonight with so many friends , benefactors and mentors is a personal privilege .
It is like a coming home for me for much of what I know about Africa was discovered within these walls , refined at this great university with generous support of the Rhodes Trust.
” It is worth keeping in mind that as she spoke those words , Rice had recently demonstrated her imperial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sudanese pharmaceutical factory in 1998 and threatening South Africa with economic destruction unless it gave up its desires for producing generic and affordable AIDS medication in the same year .
Her work to carve up Sudan , promote military intervention across the Arab and African worlds under R2P and supranational organization ’ s like Soros ’ International Criminal Court ( ICC ) that issued an arrest warrant for President Bashir would have made Cecil Rhodes proud .
We should not forget that the Sudan-Libya-Egypt alliance under the combined leadership of Mubarak , Qadhafi @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a new gold-backed financing system outside of the IMF/World Bank to fund large scale development .
As of this writing , Rhodes Scholar Eric Garcetti ( LA Mayor ) has been pulled from the Biden cabinet due to a growing mountain of scandals , and corruption in his local state which have turned him into political poison for the time being .
The other Rhodes Scholar mayor Pete Buttigieg , has been more fortunate however and has been given the keys to Transport portfolio as of December 15 , although had first been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ambassador to China .
While many Trump supporters are being induced to hate and fear China as the “ natural enemy of the USA ” , it was in fact Buttigieg who demonstrated that his disdain for Trump was only paralleled by his disdain for China when he said in May 2020 : “ Beijing sees an opportunity to call into question the American project and liberal democracy itself .
One thing they ’ re banking on is four more years of Trump.
” As I laid out in my previous report , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ greatest threats to his “ open society ” as 1 ) Xi Jinping ’ s China and 2 ) Trump ’ s USA .
Another Rhodie named Bruce Reed who had originally entered Washington as part of the first 1992 Rhodes Scholar infusion as the Clinton-Gore campaign manager and later director of Clinton ’ s Domestic Policy Council , has been tapped as the top tech advisor to Biden where he has openly called for cracking down on free speech online by cancelling Federal Internet law Section 230 .
This law currently keeps @ @ @ @ @ @ @ published on their sites .
It ’ s cancellation would crush what dwindling free speech exists on social media .
The argument advanced by Reed has been that Section 230 has been used by Russian and Chinese operatives to infiltrate the information ecosystem and manipulate western elections .
With its repeal , Facebook and other social media sites will be forced to censor all “ illicit ” thought crimes under fear of federal prosecution .
Reed had earlier teamed up with Biden in drafting the infamous 1994 crime bill which placed countless petty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prison cheap labor complex .
During the Obama years Reed worked as Biden ’ s Chief of Staff and lead handler .
While Biden ’ s pick for Secretary of State Anthony Blinken is not himself a Rhodes Scholar , he is a life-long friend and classmate with Robert Malley ( a Rhodes Scholar who had formerly acted as Special Assistant to Obama serving as “ point man in the middle east ” at the NSC ) .
Earlier , Malley had been special assistant to Bill Clinton on Arab Israeli Affairs and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ operations from day one of his entry into politics .
Since 2016 , Malley has acted as President and CEO of the International Crisis Group ( ICG ) founded by George Soros and Lord Malloch Brown in 1994 as a tool to promote global humanitarian wars under the guise of Responsibility to Protect ( R2P ) .
Joining Soros , Malloch-Brown and Malley at the ICG , we should not be surprised to find none other than… Jake Sullivan .
Additionally , Blinken ’ s father Donald Blinken made a name for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hungary from 1994-1998 where he served as US Ambassador facilitating the growth of Soros ’ Open Society Foundation .
He was later rewarded by the Hungarian speculator with a “ Donald and Vera Blinken Open Society Archive ” ( OSA ) at Budapest ’ s Central European University .
The Soros-funded university was created in the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union and Blinken was instrumental in that operation .
President Viktor Orbán knew exactly what he was doing when he expelled this foreign anti-nation state brainwashing operation from Hungary ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time , Central European University President Count Michael Ignatieff screamed “ This is unprecedented .
A U.S. institution has been driven out of a country that is a NATO ally.
” It is noteworthy that Ignatieff is himself the son of Rhodes Scholar globalist George Ignatieff and great grandson of Count Nikolai Pavlovich Ignatiev ( founder of the Russian Okhrana secret police ) whose family was rewarded handsomely for services rendered to London-centered oligarchy during the overthrow of the Czarist system in Russia ( sort of a precursor to today ’ s modern @ @ @ @ @ @ @ partially told in Cheney Revives Parvus ’ Permanent War Madness by Jeff Steinberg ( 2005 ) .
As a sidenote , Michael Ignatieff ’ s great grandfather on his maternal side is none other than George Parkin , the first controller of the Rhodes Trust from 1902-1922 and the man whose Oxford lectures and books inspired Cecil Rhodes and Milner to devote their lives to the cause of Empire .
Michael is also a global board member of Soros ’ Open Society Foundations headed by none other than Mark Malloch Brown ( as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ As I laid out in my recent report , not only did these two upper level managers come to light as coordinators of the Dominion/Smartmatic vote fraud operation underway within the USA , but both have also pioneered the new age of regime change color revolutions beginning with Marcos ’ 1986 ouster during the Peoples ’ Power revolution in the Philippines , through the Balkans , Georgia , Ukraine , Kyrgyzstan , Belarus , Moldova , Bolivia , etc .
While the Rhodes Trust has been close to the causal nexus of much @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should assume that every Rhodes Scholar is guilty by association .
It is an undeniable fact that some Rhodes Scholars have broken with their training and have gone on to live useful lives and I see no reason to assume , for instance , that actor/singer Kris Kristofferson played a nefarious role in anything ( though some of his film choices were a bit weak ) .
Similarly , Canada ’ s John Turner did some very useful things in his short stint as Canadian Prime Minister which earned him the ire of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the Euro .
Even Bill Clinton was induced to break from his profile on a few occasions and support some good things that ran contrary to the world government agenda under the positive influence of Commerce Secretary Ron Brown ( whose convenient death in 1996 alongside 34 journalists and business executives in Croatia ended that pesky issue- a story for another time ) .
The key thing to hold in mind is that longer waves of history are shaping the present more than most historians would care to admit .
Anyone taking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ come to recognize quickly enough that events that took place centuries ago have an active impact on the events playing out today .
How and why is this so ?
Because history is shaped by IDEAS .
Good ideas that are in tune with the truthful nature of reality vs bad ideas that are out of tune with said reality .
But this battle over ideas ( and ideas about ideas e.g .
: Plato ’ s higher hypothesis ) is where the causal nexus of universal history is found .
With this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how certain people use their influence to conspire and create cultural and political institutions that transmit those ideas and organizing principles across many generations .
Sometimes we find these forces to be acting in harmony with natural law ( as in the case of Benjamin Franklin and his international network of co-thinkers ) and sometimes very much in defiance of natural law .
Today ’ s battle between the opposing paradigms of the multipolar alliance led by Russia and China on the one hand vs the unipolarist/post-nation state worldview on the other has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of history .
The only way to comprehend the color revolution playing out within the USA , or the anomalous emergence of Rhodes Scholars shaping the possible Biden presidency , is by recognizing this higher reality .
This exercise may cause you to think about thinking differently , and at first may be uncomfortable , but just as the figure released from the cave who slowly accustoms his/her eyes to the light of the sun and reality , the satisfaction of enjoying a higher order of truthfulness is incomparably more pleasant to a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an elite class of puppeteers .
Matthew Ehret is the Editor-in-Chief of the Canadian Patriot Review , Senior Fellow at the American University in Moscow , BRI Expert on Tactical talk , and has authored 3 volumes of ‘ Untold History of Canada ’ book series .
In 2019 he co-founded the Montreal-based Rising Tide Foundation .
He can be reached at [ email protected ]

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
Originally published on the Strategic Culture Foundation
With Trump’s ascension to the presidency in 2016, the Rhodes Scholars that had permeated the U.S. Deep State over many years found themselves choking on humble pie as they were removed from the drivers’ seat of world affairs for the first time in decades. The paradigm of post-nation state unipolarism that had been carefully built up over the post-WWII period had somehow been successfully challenged by an outsider as the republic was slowly returned to its patriotic traditions as a nation committed to non-interventionism, industrial progress and protectionism.
In the last few days, it has become clear that these Oxford-trained Rhodes Scholars have re-emerged as leading voices in Biden’s cabinet, and since a general understanding of this problem is so lacking today (leading many patriots to be duped into believing that the evil Chinese are at the heart of their woes), I think some preliminary words are needed as a matter of historical context.
Cecil Rhodes’ Vision Revisited
Every year since its creation in 1902, over 30 talented young American scholars have been rewarded each year with the privilege of an all-expenses paid brainwashing in the halls of Oxford University on the dime of the riches left to posterity by the deceased race patriot diamond magnate Cecil Rhodes before being re-deployed back to their home nations.
Rhodes’ early disciples included such luminaries as Lord Alfred Milner, Sir Halford Mackinder, George Parkin, W.T. Stead and the Canadian oligarch Vincent Massey (to name a few). His early backers included high level figures among the British intelligentsia including Prince Edward Albert and Lord Nathaniel Rothschild who saw that a new strategy was needed to halt the spread of American System policies around the world in the wake of Lincoln’s victory over the South during the Civil War.
At the time, anyone with half a brain knew that the unipolar days of the British Empire were coming to an end as a new multipolar system of win-win cooperation was emerging… and this was a prospect deemed intolerable by many devout social Darwinists among the British ruling class.
These early Rhodians interfaced closely with London’s Fabian Society throughout the 20th century and became the new disciplined elite that gradually infiltrated every branch of society. This new breed of imperial managers exerted its influence in much the same way earlier Jesuit operations had been formed and deployed across Europe beginning in the 16th century.
For anyone confused as to the purpose of this Rhodes Scholarship program, one need look no further than Rhodes’ 1877 Confessions of Faith and 7 wills which called for domination of the “inferior races” to Anglo-Saxon superiority, and the ultimate recapturing of America and the creation of a new Church of the British Empire:
“Let us form the same kind of society, a Church for the extension of the British Empire. A society which should have its members in every part of the British Empire working with one object and one idea we should have its members placed at our universities and our schools and should watch the English youth passing through their hands just one perhaps in every thousand would have the mind and feelings for such an object, he should be tried in every way, he should be tested whether he is endurant, possessed of eloquence, disregardful of the petty details of life, and if found to be such, then elected and bound by oath to serve for the rest of his life in his Country. He should then be supported if without means by the Society and sent to that part of the Empire where it was felt he was needed.’
In another will, Rhodes described in more detail his intention: “To and for the establishment, promotion and development of a Secret Society, the true aim and object whereof shall be for the extension of British rule throughout the world. The colonization by British subjects of all lands where the means of livelihood are attainable by energy, labour, and enterprise and especially the occupation by British settlers of the entire Continent of Africa, the Holy Land, the Valley of the Euphrates, the islands of Cyprus and Candia, the whole of South America, the islands of the Pacific not heretofore possessed by Great Britain, the whole of the Malay Archipelago, these aboard of China and Japan, [and] the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire.”
Describing his thinking to his disciple W.T. Stead, Rhodes wrote: “Please remember the key of my idea discussed with you is a Society, copied from the Jesuits as to organisation”.
A Calamitous 20th Century
As generations passed, the continuity of purpose that transcended individual lives of players on the stage was maintained by certain organizations that grew out of the original Rhodes/Milner Round Table movements and which had branches in every part of the Anglo-Saxon part of the British Empire. By 1919 after the Round Table had taken control of Canadian and British governments during 1911 and 1916 coups, this group created the Royal Institute for International Affairs (aka: Chatham House). By 1921, an American branch was set up called the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) staffed with Rhodes Scholars and Fabians which has maintained a continuity of intention to the present day. This organization spawned dozens of influential sub organizations which always interface with a form of “central command”.
A young student of Harvard’s William Yandell Elliot (himself a Rhodes Scholar who operated the Oxford Branch of Harvard) was none other than Sir Henry Kissinger who stated gushingly at a May 10, 1981 Chatham House event:
“The British were so matter-of-factly helpful that they became a participant in internal American deliberations, to a degree probably never practiced between sovereign nations… In my White House incarnation then, I kept the British Foreign Office better informed and more closely engaged than I did the American State Department… It was symptomatic”.
While the Rhodes Scholar hives managed to permeate ivy league schools, media outlets, private corporations, elected offices and the civil service during the 20th century as laid out by Professor Carrol Quigley’s posthumously published The Anglo-American Establishment, the prize of the presidency remained an elusive trophy… until the day that one of Quigley’s students returned from Oxford and became Governor of Arkansas.
Clinton Opens the Floodgates
With Clinton’s 1992 presidential victory, Rhodes Scholars like Strobe Talbott (Assistant Secretary of State and co-architect of Perestroika) and Robert Reich (Secretary of Labor), were joined by Rhodies Ira Magaziner, Derek Shearer (Senior Economic Advisors), Susan Rice (Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs), Kevin Thurme (Health and Human Services Chief of Staff), George Stephanopoulos (Communications Director) and dozens of other Rhodes Scholars. These individuals were funneled into positions of influence aiming to oversee the “end of history” celebrated by neocon thinker Francis Fukuyama as the Soviet Union disintegrated.
While some Rhodies remained in positions of power during the period of the Straussian controlled opposition of 2000-2008, the Rhodes Hives again enjoyed vast policy-shaping influence under the Obama-age where the architecture for one world government was built on the wreckage of troublesome nation states like Libya, Syria and Ukraine.
Despite the set back caused by a populist deplorable who wrestled the reins of power away from these self-professed experts in 2016, a Rhodie is a stubborn creature if nothing else, and as we have discovered in past months, both Talbott and Rice have been revealed to be two figures at the heart of the Russiagate plot designed to undo the results of 2016. While still serving as Brookings Institute President in 2015-17, it was Talbott who interfaced with MI6’s Sir Richard Dearlove and Christopher Steele in the months before the elections by cooking up and circulating the dodgy dossier and it was Rice who was revealed to be at the center of the “unmasking” entrapment operation conducted on a bewildered Michael Flynn in January 2017.
Revenge of Rice and the Rhodies
With the recently announced appointment of Susan Rice as director of Biden’s Domestic Policy Council, it has become apparent that the Rhodies are drooling at the prospect of correcting the “aberration” of Trump by re-ascending to the inner sanctum of Washington D.C., bringing in droves of Clinton-Obama era unipolar zombies with them.
Beyond Rice, other Rhodes Scholars emerging into positions of control include National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan who graduated from Oxford’s Magdalene College and worked under Strobe Talbott at the Brookings Institute’s Center for the Study for Globalization at Yale in 2000. During this time, Rice had also come to work as Senior Fellow at Brookings followed by a stint as UN Ambassador from 2009-2013 and National Security Advisor from 2013-2017, while Sullivan went onto become Biden’s top security aid during the Obama years.
Describing her love of Oxford, Rice delivered remarks at Rhodes House in 1999 saying: “To be at Rhodes House tonight with so many friends, benefactors and mentors is a personal privilege. It is like a coming home for me for much of what I know about Africa was discovered within these walls, refined at this great university with generous support of the Rhodes Trust.”
It is worth keeping in mind that as she spoke those words, Rice had recently demonstrated her imperial worldview by coordinating the destruction of a Sudanese pharmaceutical factory in 1998 and threatening South Africa with economic destruction unless it gave up its desires for producing generic and affordable AIDS medication in the same year. Her work to carve up Sudan, promote military intervention across the Arab and African worlds under R2P and supranational organization’s like Soros’ International Criminal Court (ICC) that issued an arrest warrant for President Bashir would have made Cecil Rhodes proud. We should not forget that the Sudan-Libya-Egypt alliance under the combined leadership of Mubarak, Qadhafi and Bashir, had moved to establish a new gold-backed financing system outside of the IMF/World Bank to fund large scale development.
Pete Buttigieg
As of this writing, Rhodes Scholar Eric Garcetti (LA Mayor) has been pulled from the Biden cabinet due to a growing mountain of scandals, and corruption in his local state which have turned him into political poison for the time being.
The other Rhodes Scholar mayor Pete Buttigieg, has been more fortunate however and has been given the keys to Transport portfolio as of December 15, although had first been poised to take the position of US Ambassador to China. While many Trump supporters are being induced to hate and fear China as the “natural enemy of the USA”, it was in fact Buttigieg who demonstrated that his disdain for Trump was only paralleled by his disdain for China when he said in May 2020: “Beijing sees an opportunity to call into question the American project and liberal democracy itself. One thing they’re banking on is four more years of Trump.”
As I laid out in my previous report, Soros himself has repeatedly labelled the two greatest threats to his “open society” as 1) Xi Jinping’s China and 2) Trump’s USA.
Another Rhodie named Bruce Reed who had originally entered Washington as part of the first 1992 Rhodes Scholar infusion as the Clinton-Gore campaign manager and later director of Clinton’s Domestic Policy Council, has been tapped as the top tech advisor to Biden where he has openly called for cracking down on free speech online by cancelling Federal Internet law Section 230. This law currently keeps website owners free of prosecution for content published on their sites. It’s cancellation would crush what dwindling free speech exists on social media. The argument advanced by Reed has been that Section 230 has been used by Russian and Chinese operatives to infiltrate the information ecosystem and manipulate western elections. With its repeal, Facebook and other social media sites will be forced to censor all “illicit” thought crimes under fear of federal prosecution.
Reed had earlier teamed up with Biden in drafting the infamous 1994 crime bill which placed countless petty criminals to long-term sentences, benefiting the prison cheap labor complex. During the Obama years Reed worked as Biden’s Chief of Staff and lead handler.
Blinken, Malley and Soros
While Biden’s pick for Secretary of State Anthony Blinken is not himself a Rhodes Scholar, he is a life-long friend and classmate with Robert Malley (a Rhodes Scholar who had formerly acted as Special Assistant to Obama serving as “point man in the middle east” at the NSC). Earlier, Malley had been special assistant to Bill Clinton on Arab Israeli Affairs and was always deeply enmeshed with George Soros’ operations from day one of his entry into politics. Since 2016, Malley has acted as President and CEO of the International Crisis Group (ICG) founded by George Soros and Lord Malloch Brown in 1994 as a tool to promote global humanitarian wars under the guise of Responsibility to Protect (R2P). Joining Soros, Malloch-Brown and Malley at the ICG, we should not be surprised to find none other than… Jake Sullivan.
Additionally, Blinken’s father Donald Blinken made a name for himself as Soros’ point man in Hungary from 1994-1998 where he served as US Ambassador facilitating the growth of Soros’ Open Society Foundation. He was later rewarded by the Hungarian speculator with a “Donald and Vera Blinken Open Society Archive” (OSA) at Budapest’s Central European University. The Soros-funded university was created in the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union and Blinken was instrumental in that operation.
President Viktor Orbán knew exactly what he was doing when he expelled this foreign anti-nation state brainwashing operation from Hungary’s borders in 2018. At the time, Central European University President Count Michael Ignatieff screamed “This is unprecedented. A U.S. institution has been driven out of a country that is a NATO ally.”
A Segue on Count Ignatieff
It is noteworthy that Ignatieff is himself the son of Rhodes Scholar globalist George Ignatieff and great grandson of Count Nikolai Pavlovich Ignatiev (founder of the Russian Okhrana secret police) whose family was rewarded handsomely for services rendered to London-centered oligarchy during the overthrow of the Czarist system in Russia (sort of a precursor to today’s modern Color Revolutions). This story is partially told in Cheney Revives Parvus’ Permanent War Madness by Jeff Steinberg (2005).
As a sidenote, Michael Ignatieff’s great grandfather on his maternal side is none other than George Parkin, the first controller of the Rhodes Trust from 1902-1922 and the man whose Oxford lectures and books inspired Cecil Rhodes and Milner to devote their lives to the cause of Empire. Michael is also a global board member of Soros’ Open Society Foundations headed by none other than Mark Malloch Brown (as of December 4, 2020).
As I laid out in my recent report, not only did these two upper level managers come to light as coordinators of the Dominion/Smartmatic vote fraud operation underway within the USA, but both have also pioneered the new age of regime change color revolutions beginning with Marcos’ 1986 ouster during the Peoples’ Power revolution in the Philippines, through the Balkans, Georgia, Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan, Belarus, Moldova, Bolivia, etc.
Some Final Thoughts
While the Rhodes Trust has been close to the causal nexus of much of recent world history, no one should assume that every Rhodes Scholar is guilty by association. It is an undeniable fact that some Rhodes Scholars have broken with their training and have gone on to live useful lives and I see no reason to assume, for instance, that actor/singer Kris Kristofferson played a nefarious role in anything (though some of his film choices were a bit weak).
Similarly, Canada’s John Turner did some very useful things in his short stint as Canadian Prime Minister which earned him the ire of many unipolarists then promoting NAFTA, Maastricht and the Euro. Even Bill Clinton was induced to break from his profile on a few occasions and support some good things that ran contrary to the world government agenda under the positive influence of Commerce Secretary Ron Brown (whose convenient death in 1996 alongside 34 journalists and business executives in Croatia ended that pesky issue- a story for another time).
The key thing to hold in mind is that longer waves of history are shaping the present more than most historians would care to admit. Anyone taking an intention-driven approach to historical analysis will come to recognize quickly enough that events that took place centuries ago have an active impact on the events playing out today.
How and why is this so? Because history is shaped by IDEAS. Good ideas that are in tune with the truthful nature of reality vs bad ideas that are out of tune with said reality. But this battle over ideas (and ideas about ideas e.g.: Plato’s higher hypothesis) is where the causal nexus of universal history is found. With this in mind, we can see clearly how certain people use their influence to conspire and create cultural and political institutions that transmit those ideas and organizing principles across many generations. Sometimes we find these forces to be acting in harmony with natural law (as in the case of Benjamin Franklin and his international network of co-thinkers) and sometimes very much in defiance of natural law.
Today’s battle between the opposing paradigms of the multipolar alliance led by Russia and China on the one hand vs the unipolarist/post-nation state worldview on the other has everything to do with these longer forces of history. The only way to comprehend the color revolution playing out within the USA, or the anomalous emergence of Rhodes Scholars shaping the possible Biden presidency, is by recognizing this higher reality. This exercise may cause you to think about thinking differently, and at first may be uncomfortable, but just as the figure released from the cave who slowly accustoms his/her eyes to the light of the sun and reality, the satisfaction of enjoying a higher order of truthfulness is incomparably more pleasant to a life believing in the shadows cast by an elite class of puppeteers.
Matthew Ehret is the Editor-in-Chief of the Canadian Patriot Review , Senior Fellow at the American University in Moscow, BRI Expert on Tactical talk, and has authored 3 volumes of ‘Untold History of Canada’ book series. In 2019 he co-founded the Montreal-based Rising Tide Foundation. He can be reached at matt.ehret@tutamail.com
Read Later Add to Favourites Add to Collection Report


theduran--2020-12-29--Now that Navalny has proven useless, a NEW ANTI-PUTIN “star is born”

Now that Navalny has proven useless , a NEW ANTI-PUTIN “ star is born ” Moscow police question Navalny associate @ @ @ @ @ violently ’ broke into apartment of alleged FSB poison team member Moscow police question Navalny @ @ @ @ @ ‘ violently ’ broke into apartment of alleged FSB poison team member Russian opposition activist @ @ @ @ @ by Moscow police after she visited the home of one of the purported state security @ @ @ @ @ part of a plot to poison her close ally Alexey Navalny .
Help us grow @ @ @ @ @ Patreon !

Switch to the dark mode that's kinder on your eyes at night time.
Switch to the light mode that's kinder on your eyes at day time.


theduran--2020-12-29--Rudy Giuliani gives us significant information about the election crisis [Video]

The News Media Blackout has done great damage to the ability of average Americans ( and even news junkies like myself ) to get real and useful information about what is going on .
In this fiercely contested election of 2020 , President Trump has still not conceded defeat , and he still seems to believe that there is a way to pull a victory out of the jaws of a fraud-ridden defeat .
Yes , there is fraud .
The MSM is working really hard to say that there isn ’ t , but they are simply lying .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ my claim .
There are instead a great number of facts and information .
Why doesn ’ t the average American know about this ?
Why do many Trump supporters not know about this ?
The answer is very simple and it has only partly to do with the blackout .
For decades , the American people have been accustomed to getting the whole world in no more than 42 minutes per day .
42 minutes is the average broadcast time of many one-hour news broadcast time slots .
That one hour is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – 21 minute – bites ( heavily paid for by commercials ) .
There is not much time to discuss anything complex .
The press is also biased – hating Mr. Trump for any reason and for no reason at all , other than that everybody else in the field hates him , so I will just go along , not knowing or caring to know why .
These two factors combine to produce a perfect storm of denial , discouragement and a great platform for the media to do a full-court press @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get them to give up and despair that Trump is simply not going to be in the White House for a second term on January 20th .
Period .
Nancy Pelosi said so .
Hillary Clinton said so .
Chuck Schumer implied it .
Many other Democrats and not a few Republicans have also said or agreed , loudly and silently , with this very decided effort to push the man out and replace him with an aging flunkie who can not put his sentences together much of the time , but who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ causes leftist , since he is one himself .
The antidote for this lack of information is simple : We have to sit down and watch longer programs ; we have to read longer explanations , and we have to really acquaint ourselves with what the reality of this situation with the election actually is .
There really is no way around this .
The trolls on the ‘ Net and their analogues under the stage lights are very glib with one-liners , but , seriously – it is not possible to explain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a one-liner .
It is not possible to gain a university education in Computer Engineering with one-liners .
It is not possible to explain how to cure COVID-19 with a one-liner .
And , it is not possible to explain the election fraud with a one-liner .
This .
simply .
can not .
be .
done .
This means we have to study , to listen , to learn and to think for ourselves .
This , in a time where almost all of us have been conditioned to impatience , to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to think critically for themselves .
This is the biggest difference between the liberals and the Trump supporters .
Most of the Trump supporters are intellectually articulate and can easily state their case for why they support the man , and they also can state their case for why they understand that this election that just happened was deliberately compromised and fraudulent .
Liberals can not articulate their position ; they only shout down the conservatives with their one-liners and anger .
Over and over through history such people have torn down good @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tremendously fickle and yet powerful leaders that are responsible for the slaughter of hundreds of millions of people worldwide .
One-liners have a lot of incendiary power , do they not ?
We present Rudy Giuliani ’ s podcast video filmed December 26th , concerning the election .
He takes the time to explain the situation we face .
It takes time for us to listen to him , but we who love our nation as she was founded need to listen .
Conservative one-liners do not ever work as well as liberal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ honest to give ourselves to pure passion and rage like their side does .
Whether that is genetic , inherited or “ formed ” , I do not know .
I do know I was very liberal once .
In some ways perhaps I still am , but I am also one of these people who have come to a conservative point of view through experience and hard , honest reflection .
I would never be able to win a shouting match with a liberal .
But I know my side ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take the day .
Hopefully Mayor Giulianis ’ program gives us a push in that direction – the right direction .

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
The News Media Blackout has done great damage to the ability of average Americans (and even news junkies like myself) to get real and useful information about what is going on. In this fiercely contested election of 2020, President Trump has still not conceded defeat, and he still seems to believe that there is a way to pull a victory out of the jaws of a fraud-ridden defeat.
Yes, there is fraud. The MSM is working really hard to say that there isn’t, but they are simply lying. There is no conspiracy at play in my claim. There are instead a great number of facts and information.
Why doesn’t the average American know about this? Why do many Trump supporters not know about this? The answer is very simple and it has only partly to do with the blackout.
For decades, the American people have been accustomed to getting the whole world in no more than 42 minutes per day. 42 minutes is the average broadcast time of many one-hour news broadcast time slots. That one hour is often broken into two thirty-minute – ooops – 21 minute – bites (heavily paid for by commercials). There is not much time to discuss anything complex. The press is also biased – hating Mr. Trump for any reason and for no reason at all, other than that everybody else in the field hates him, so I will just go along, not knowing or caring to know why.
These two factors combine to produce a perfect storm of denial, discouragement and a great platform for the media to do a full-court press on all the American people, to get them to give up and despair that Trump is simply not going to be in the White House for a second term on January 20th. Period. Nancy Pelosi said so. Hillary Clinton said so. Chuck Schumer implied it. Many other Democrats and not a few Republicans have also said or agreed, loudly and silently, with this very decided effort to push the man out and replace him with an aging flunkie who cannot put his sentences together much of the time, but who is nevertheless an easy pushover for all causes leftist, since he is one himself.
The antidote for this lack of information is simple: We have to sit down and watch longer programs; we have to read longer explanations, and we have to really acquaint ourselves with what the reality of this situation with the election actually is. There really is no way around this. The trolls on the ‘Net and their analogues under the stage lights are very glib with one-liners, but, seriously – it is not possible to explain how to get to the moon with a one-liner. It is not possible to gain a university education in Computer Engineering with one-liners. It is not possible to explain how to cure COVID-19 with a one-liner. And, it is not possible to explain the election fraud with a one-liner.
This. simply. cannot. be. done.
This means we have to study, to listen, to learn and to think for ourselves. This, in a time where almost all of us have been conditioned to impatience, to instant gratification, and to not having to think critically for themselves.
This is the biggest difference between the liberals and the Trump supporters. Most of the Trump supporters are intellectually articulate and can easily state their case for why they support the man, and they also can state their case for why they understand that this election that just happened was deliberately compromised and fraudulent.
Liberals cannot articulate their position; they only shout down the conservatives with their one-liners and anger. Over and over through history such people have torn down good kingdoms and governments, replacing them with tremendously fickle and yet powerful leaders that are responsible for the slaughter of hundreds of millions of people worldwide. One-liners have a lot of incendiary power, do they not?
We present Rudy Giuliani’s podcast video filmed December 26th, concerning the election. He takes the time to explain the situation we face. It takes time for us to listen to him, but we who love our nation as she was founded need to listen. Conservative one-liners do not ever work as well as liberal one-liners, because we are too intellectually honest to give ourselves to pure passion and rage like their side does. Whether that is genetic, inherited or “formed”, I do not know. I do know I was very liberal once. In some ways perhaps I still am, but I am also one of these people who have come to a conservative point of view through experience and hard, honest reflection. I would never be able to win a shouting match with a liberal. But I know my side’s intellectual argument, which eventually, must take the day.
Hopefully Mayor Giulianis’ program gives us a push in that direction – the right direction.
Read Later Add to Favourites Add to Collection Report


theduran--2020-12-30--H.G. Wells’ Dystopic Vision Comes Alive With the Great Reset Agenda

In the Time Machine , society one million years in the future has evolved into two separate species called Morlocks and Eloi .
The Morlocks represent the ugly dirty producers who by this future age , all live under ground and run the world ’ s manufacturing .
The Eloi are the effect of the inbreeding of the elite , who by this time are simple-minded , Aryan , above-ground dwellers living in idleness and consuming only what the Morlocks produce .
What was the trade off ?
The Morlocks periodically rise above ground in hunting parties to kidnap and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ circle of life .
This famous story was written by a young British writer in 1893 whose ideas and pioneering work in shaping new techniques of cultural warfare which profoundly affected the next 130 years of human history .
These ideas led to the innovation of novel techniques of “ predictive programming ” , and to mass psychological warfare .
In contrast to the optimistic views of mankind and the future potential envisioned by the great science fiction writer Jules Verne earlier , Wells ’ misanthropic tales had the intended effect of reducing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that Verne ’ s work awoke .
To restate the technique more clearly : By shaping society ’ s imagination of the future , and embedding existential/nihilistic outcomes within his plotlines , Wells realized that the entire zeitgeist of humanity could be affected on a profound level than simple conscious reason would permit .
Since he robed his poison in the cloth of “ fiction ” the minds of those receiving his stories would find their critical thinking faculties disengaged and would simply take in all trojan horses embedded in the stories into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ insight used for over a century by social engineers and intelligence agencies whose aim has always been the willing enslavement of all people of the earth .
While he is best known for such fiction works as The War of the Worlds , The World Set Free , The Invisible Man , The Island of Doctor Morrow , and The Time Machine , Wells ’ lesser-known non-fiction writings like The Open Conspiracy , The New World Order , The Outline of History , The Science of Life and The World Brain served as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ century war against sovereign nation states and the very idea of a society built on the premise of mankind made in the image of God .
The members of the London-centered oligarchy to which Wells had devoted himself at an early age had found themselves stuck in a rut by the turn of the 19th century .
These inbred families and retainers who managed the dying British Empire had long been encrusted by the vices of decadence by the time a young man of low breeding and high talent arose amidst the London-ghettos @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s assistant .
This young surgeon ’ s name was Thomas Huxley .
Huxley possessed a sardonic wit , a deep misanthropy , and an intelligence that were soon discovered by powerful patrons , and by his mid-20 ’ s , this young man found himself a rising star in Britain ’ s Royal Academy of Science .
Here he quickly became a leading creative force , shaping Britain ’ s powerful X Club , serving as Darwin ’ s bulldog promoting popular debates featuring himself against literalist members of the clergy .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s chaos-bound interpretation of evolution .
He also founded Nature magazine as a propaganda instrument which has been used to enforce scientific consensus favorable to a world empire to this very day .
Huxley chose his opponents carefully , ensuring that he could easily and publicly obliterate the arguments of simple-minded Anglican clergy , and thus convince all onlookers that the only choice they had to account for the evolution of new species was either literal Biblical creationism or his brand of Darwinian evolution .
The many alternative scientific theories of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the works of Karl Ernst von Baer , Georges Cuvier , Lamarck and James D. Dana ) which accounted for both the evolution of species , and the harmonics of all parts to a whole , as well as creative leaps were forgotten amidst this false dichotomy which this author unpacked in a recent interview .
During his later years , Huxley mentored a young H.G .
Wells , together with a whole generation of new imperial practitioners of the arts of social engineering ( and social Darwinism ) .
This social @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s eugenics quickly becoming an accepted science practiced across the western world .
Wells was himself the son of a lowly gardener , but , like Huxley , exhibited a strong misanthropic wit , passion and creativity lacking in the high nobility , and he was thus raised from the lower ranks of society into the order of oligarchical management by the 1890s .
During this moment of vast potential- and – it can not be restated enough- the oligarchical order that had grown overconfident during the 200+ years of hegemony were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ earth rapidly breaking free from this hegemony thanks to the under the international spread of Lincoln ’ s American System across Germany , Russia , Japan , South America , France , Canada and even China with Sun Yat-sen ’ s 1911 republican revolution .
As outlined in Cynthia Chung ’ s ‘ Why Russia Saved the USA ’ , the oligarchy just no longer seemed to have the creative vitality and sophistication required to snuff out these revolutionary flames .
Wells described this problem in the following terms : The science of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Wells , Mackinder , Milner and Bertrand Russell was the basis for a new scientific priesthood and “ world government ” that would put a stop to the startling disequilibrium unleashed by the electric spread of sovereign nation states , protectionism and commitment to scientific and technological progress .
Fabians , Round Tablers and Coefficients : New Think Tanks Emerge H.G Wells , Russell and other early social engineers of this new priesthood organized themselves in several interconnected think tanks known as 1 ) the Fabian Society of Sidney and Beatrice Webb @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Economics , 2 ) the Round Table Movement begun by the fortunes left to posterity by the racist diamond magnate Cecil Rhodes which also gave rise to the Rhodes Trust , and Rhodes Scholarship programs established to indoctrinate young talent in the halls of Oxford , and finally 3 ) the Co-Efficients Club of London .
As noted by Georgetown Professor Carol Quigley , in his 1981 The Anglo-American Establishment , membership in all three organizations was virtually interchangeable .
Wells described the rise of these original think tanks and documented the inner @ @ @ @ @ @ @ challenge of the times saying : “ Our ruling class , protected in its advantages by a universal snobbery was broad-minded , easy going and profoundly lazy… Our liberalism was no longer a larger enterprise , it had become a generous indolence .
But minds were waking up to this .
Over our table at St Ermin ’ s Hotel wrangle Maxse , Bellairs , Hewins , Amery and Mackinder , all stung by the small but humiliating tale of disasters in the South African war , all sensitive to the threat of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the naval and military aggressiveness of Germany.
” Fearful of the prospect of a US-Russia-China alliance outlined in depth by Fabian/Roundtable members Halford Mackinder and Lord Alfred Milner , the solution was simple : kick over the chess board and get everyone to just slaughter each other .
Accounts of the British imperial efforts to orchestrate this war have been told in many locations , but none as efficiently as the 2008 documentary 1932 : Speak Not of Parties .
In the wake of the destruction which left 9 million dead on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wells , Russell and the Milner Roundtable became leading voices for world government under the League of Nations ( c. 1919 ) advocating “ enlightened cosmopolitanism ” to replace the era of “ selfish nation states ” .
A decade after its founding , the League was less successful than Wells and his co-thinkers would have liked , with nationalists from around the world recognizing the evil hand of empire lurking behind the apparent language of “ liberal values and world peace ” .
Sun Yat-sen , among many others was among the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in 1924 not to fall into this trap saying : “ The nations which are employing imperialism to conquer others and which are trying to maintain their own favored positions as sovereign lords of the whole world are advocating cosmopolitanism [ aka : global governance/globalization -ed ] and want the world to join them… Nationalism is that precious possession by which humanity maintains its existence .
If nationalism decays , then when cosmopolitanism flourishes we will be unable to survive and will be eliminated ” .
In response to this patriotic resistance across @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be concocted .
This took the form of H.G .
Welles ’ 1928 The Open Conspiracy : Blueprint for a World Revolution .
This little-known book served as a guiding blueprint for the next century of imperial grand strategy calling for a new world religion and social order .
According to Wells : “ The old faiths have become unconvincing , unsubstantial and insincere , and though there are clear intimations of a new faith in the world , it still awaits embodiment in formulae and organizations that will bring it into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whole.
” In his book , Welles outlines the need for a new scientific gospel to supersede the Judeo-Christian faiths of the western world .
This new gospel consisted of a series of tomes which he and his colleague Julian Huxley composed , entitled : 1 ) The Outline of History ( 1920 ) where Wells re-wrote all of history wishing this analysis to replace the book of Genesis , 2 ) The Science of Life ( 1930 ) , co-written with Sir Julian Huxley ( Thomas Huxley ’ s Grandson who continued @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and 3 ) The Work , Wealth and Happiness of Mankind ( 1932 ) .
Part of this immense project to create a new coherent synthetic religion to re-organize humanity involved a re-packaging of a Darwinism that was falling out of favor with many scientists of the 1920 ’ s .
They recognized its failure to account for obvious features of nature such as directionality in evolution , spirit , intention , ideas and design .
This re-packaging took the form of the “ New Evolutionary Synthesis ” which attempted to save @ @ @ @ @ @ @ corollaries using Jesuit priest Pierre Teilhard de Chardin ’ s doctrine of the “ Omega Man ” .
De Chardin ’ s system synthesized the foundation of Darwinian assumptions with an acknowledgment of evolutionary directionality , the possibility of spirit , and the existence of mind as a force of nature .
The destructive slight of hand used by Chardin was that all of these “ transcendent ” features of design- spirit , mind , reason , etc.- were : 1 ) bound to a finite future point of no change which dominated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ space time , and 2 ) binding the world of mind and spirit to the forces of the material world .
The Chardin-Huxley-Wells remix kept Darwin ’ s laws relevant and kept science compatible with imperial modes of social organization .
Outlining the aims of The Open Conspiracy , Wells writes : “ Firstly , the entirely provisional nature of all existing governments , and the entirely provisional nature therefore , of all loyalties associated therewith ; Secondly , the supreme importance of population control in human biology and the possibility it affords @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the struggle for existence on ourselves ; and Thirdly , the urgent necessity of protective resistance against the present traditional drift towards war.
” By 1933 , the planned Bankers ’ Dictatorship , meant to solve the four years ’ long great depression and organized during the months-long London Conference , was on the verge of being sabotaged by the recently-elected American President Franklin Delano Roosevelt .
It was then that Wells published a new manifesto in the form of a fiction book called ‘ Shape of Things to Come : The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ soon made into a Hollywood movie ) , served as an early tool of mass predictive programming showcasing a world destroyed by decades of global war , pandemic , and anarchy- all caused by… sovereign nation states .
The “ solution ” to these dark ages took the form of a masonic society of social engineers who descended from planes ( Wells ’ ‘ Benevolent Dictatorship of the Air ’ ) to restore order under a world government .
Wells had his main character ( a social psychologist ) state “ while the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and carrying on the unified World State , the Educational Control was remoulding mankind ” .
The social psychologists managing the World Government were “ becoming the whole literature , philosophy and general thought of the world… the reasoning soul in the body of the race.
” The greatest problem to overcome , stated Wells , was “ the variability of mental resistance to direction and limits set by nature to the ideal of an acquiescent cooperative world.
” Wells ’ hero , Gustav de Windt , was “ pre-occupied by his gigantic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the ‘ spirit of opposition ’ as purely evil , as a vice to be guarded against , as a trouble in the machinery which was to be minimized as completely as possible.
” In 1932 , Wells gave an Oxford speech championing a global order run by liberal fascists saying : “ I am asking for liberal Fascisti , for enlightened Nazis ” .
This was not paradoxical when one realizes that the rise of fascism was never a “ nationalist ” phenomenon as popular history books have asserted for decades but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supranational financier-oligarchy from above who wished to use “ enforcers ” to bend their societies to a higher will .
By the time World War II began , Wells ’ ideas had evolved new insidious components that later gave rise to such mechanisms as Wikipedia and Twitter in the form of “ The World Brain ” ( 19937 ) where Wells calls for reducing the English language to a “ basic English ” of 850 accepted words which would make up a world language .
In this book , Wells states that “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we are now considering , are beginning to realize that the most hopeful line for the development of our racial intelligence lies rather in the direction of creating a new world organ for the collection , indexing , summarizing and release of knowledge , than in any further tinkering with the highly conservative and resistant university system , local , national and traditional in texture , which already exits .
These innovators , who may be dreamers today , but who hope to become very active organizers tomorrow , project a unified , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pull the mind of the world together.
” By 1940 , Wells wrote the The New World Order which again amplified his message .
In writing this , he coordinated his efforts with the many Fabians and Rhodes Scholars who had infiltrated western foreign policy establishments in order to shape the the war , but more importantly , the post-war global structure .
These were the networks that hated Franklin Roosevelt , Vice-President Henry Wallace , Harry Hopkins and other genuine “ New Dealers ” who wanted nothing more than to destroy colonialism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the war .
Wells insists that the “ new age of brotherhood ” that must guide the new United Nations must not tolerate sovereign nation states as FDR dreamed ( and as was formally enshrined in the UN Charter ) but must rather be guided by his caste of social engineers pulling the levers of production and consumption within a system of mass “ collectivization ” saying : “ Collectivisation means the handling of the common affairs of mankind by a common control responsible to the whole community .
It means the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ affairs just as much as in international affairs .
It means the frank abolition of profit-seeking and of every device by which human beings contrive to be parasitic on their fellow man .
It is the practical realisation of the brotherhood of man through a common control ” .
If Wells ’ outlines look similar to those ideas recently made public by the World Economic Forum ’ s Great Reset , then don ’ t be surprised .
Wells ’ Death and the Continuity of a Bad Idea With Wells ’ 1946 death @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his work during the Cold War .
One of the leading figures here being Wells ’ associate , Lord Bertrand Russell , who wrote in his 1952 The Impact of Science on Society : “ I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is mass psychology… .
Its importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda .
Of these the most influential is what is called ‘ education ’ .
Religion plays a part , though a diminishing one ; the press , the cinema @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the state with money and equipment.
” “ The subject will make great strides when it is taken up by scientists under a scientific dictatorship .
The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black .
Various results will soon be arrived at .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ obstructive .
Second that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten .
Thirdly verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective .
Fourth that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity .
But I anticipate .
It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black , and how much less it would cost to make them believe it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Wells , Russell and Huxley have long since rotted away , their rotten ideas continue to animate their disciples like Sir Henry Kissinger , George Soros , Klaus Schwab , Bill Gates , Lord Malloch-Brown ( whose disturbing celebration of the Coronavirus as a golden opportunity to finally restructure civilization ) should concern any thinking citizen .
The idea of a “ Great Reset ” expounded by these modern mouthpieces of history ’ s bad ideas signals nothing more than a new Dark Age which should turn the stomach of any moral @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hold the words of Kissinger in mind who had channeled the spectre of Wells telling a group of technocrats in Evian , France in 1992 : “ Today , America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order .
Tomorrow they will be grateful !
This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond whether real or promulgated , that threatened our very existence .
It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is the unknown .
When presented with this scenario , individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.
” Matthew Ehret is the Editor-in-Chief of the Canadian Patriot Review , Senior Fellow at the American University in Moscow , BRI Expert on Tactical talk , and has authored 3 volumes of ‘ Untold History of Canada ’ book series .
In 2019 he co-founded the Montreal-based Rising Tide Foundation .
He can be reached at [ email protected ]

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
Originally published on the Strategic Culture Foundation
In the Time Machine, society one million years in the future has evolved into two separate species called Morlocks and Eloi. The Morlocks represent the ugly dirty producers who by this future age, all live under ground and run the world’s manufacturing. The Eloi are the effect of the inbreeding of the elite, who by this time are simple-minded, Aryan, above-ground dwellers living in idleness and consuming only what the Morlocks produce. What was the trade off?
The Morlocks periodically rise above ground in hunting parties to kidnap and eat unsuspecting Eloi in this symbiotically vicious circle of life.
This famous story was written by a young British writer in 1893 whose ideas and pioneering work in shaping new techniques of cultural warfare which profoundly affected the next 130 years of human history. These ideas led to the innovation of novel techniques of “predictive programming”, and to mass psychological warfare. In contrast to the optimistic views of mankind and the future potential envisioned by the great science fiction writer Jules Verne earlier, Wells’ misanthropic tales had the intended effect of reducing the creative potential and love of humanity that Verne’s work awoke.
To restate the technique more clearly: By shaping society’s imagination of the future, and embedding existential/nihilistic outcomes within his plotlines, Wells realized that the entire zeitgeist of humanity could be affected on a profound level than simple conscious reason would permit. Since he robed his poison in the cloth of “fiction” the minds of those receiving his stories would find their critical thinking faculties disengaged and would simply take in all trojan horses embedded in the stories into their unconsciousness. This has been an insight used for over a century by social engineers and intelligence agencies whose aim has always been the willing enslavement of all people of the earth.
While he is best known for such fiction works as The War of the Worlds, The World Set Free, The Invisible Man, The Island of Doctor Morrow, and The Time Machine, Wells’ lesser-known non-fiction writings like The Open Conspiracy, The New World Order, The Outline of History, The Science of Life and The World Brain served as guiding strategic blueprints for the entire 20th century war against sovereign nation states and the very idea of a society built on the premise of mankind made in the image of God.
Thomas Huxley’s Revolution
The members of the London-centered oligarchy to which Wells had devoted himself at an early age had found themselves stuck in a rut by the turn of the 19th century. These inbred families and retainers who managed the dying British Empire had long been encrusted by the vices of decadence by the time a young man of low breeding and high talent arose amidst the London-ghettos treating syphilis patients as a surgeon’s assistant. This young surgeon’s name was Thomas Huxley.
Huxley possessed a sardonic wit, a deep misanthropy, and an intelligence that were soon discovered by powerful patrons, and by his mid-20’s, this young man found himself a rising star in Britain’s Royal Academy of Science. Here he quickly became a leading creative force, shaping Britain’s powerful X Club, serving as Darwin’s bulldog promoting popular debates featuring himself against literalist members of the clergy. In these debates he argued for Darwin’s chaos-bound interpretation of evolution. He also founded Nature magazine as a propaganda instrument which has been used to enforce scientific consensus favorable to a world empire to this very day.
Huxley chose his opponents carefully, ensuring that he could easily and publicly obliterate the arguments of simple-minded Anglican clergy, and thus convince all onlookers that the only choice they had to account for the evolution of new species was either literal Biblical creationism or his brand of Darwinian evolution. The many alternative scientific theories of the 19th century (such as those found in the works of Karl Ernst von Baer, Georges Cuvier, Lamarck and James D. Dana) which accounted for both the evolution of species, and the harmonics of all parts to a whole, as well as creative leaps were forgotten amidst this false dichotomy which this author unpacked in a recent interview.
Wells Picks up Huxley’s Torch
During his later years, Huxley mentored a young H.G. Wells, together with a whole generation of new imperial practitioners of the arts of social engineering (and social Darwinism). This social engineering soon took the form of Galton’s eugenics quickly becoming an accepted science practiced across the western world.
Wells was himself the son of a lowly gardener, but, like Huxley, exhibited a strong misanthropic wit, passion and creativity lacking in the high nobility, and he was thus raised from the lower ranks of society into the order of oligarchical management by the 1890s. During this moment of vast potential- and – it cannot be restated enough- the oligarchical order that had grown overconfident during the 200+ years of hegemony were petrified to see the nations of the earth rapidly breaking free from this hegemony thanks to the under the international spread of Lincoln’s American System across Germany, Russia, Japan, South America, France, Canada and even China with Sun Yat-sen’s 1911 republican revolution.
As outlined in Cynthia Chung’s ‘Why Russia Saved the USA’, the oligarchy just no longer seemed to have the creative vitality and sophistication required to snuff out these revolutionary flames.
Wells described this problem in the following terms:
“The undeniable contraction of the British outlook in the opening decade of the new century is one that has exercised my mind very greatly… Gradually, the belief in the possible world leadership of England had been deflated by the economic development of America and the militant boldness of Germany. The long reign of Queen Victoria, so prosperous, progressive and effortless, had produced habits of political indolence and cheap assurance. As a people we had got out of training, and when the challenge of these new rivals became open, it took our breath away at once. We did not know how to meet it…”
The science of population control advanced by Huxley, Galton, Wells, Mackinder, Milner and Bertrand Russell was the basis for a new scientific priesthood and “world government” that would put a stop to the startling disequilibrium unleashed by the electric spread of sovereign nation states, protectionism and commitment to scientific and technological progress.
Fabians, Round Tablers and Coefficients: New Think Tanks Emerge
H.G Wells, Russell and other early social engineers of this new priesthood organized themselves in several interconnected think tanks known as 1) the Fabian Society of Sidney and Beatrice Webb which operated through the London School of Economics, 2) the Round Table Movement begun by the fortunes left to posterity by the racist diamond magnate Cecil Rhodes which also gave rise to the Rhodes Trust, and Rhodes Scholarship programs established to indoctrinate young talent in the halls of Oxford, and finally 3) the Co-Efficients Club of London. As noted by Georgetown Professor Carol Quigley, in his 1981 The Anglo-American Establishment, membership in all three organizations was virtually interchangeable.
Wells described the rise of these original think tanks and documented the inner elite’s inability to meet the challenge of the times saying: “Our ruling class, protected in its advantages by a universal snobbery was broad-minded, easy going and profoundly lazy… Our liberalism was no longer a larger enterprise, it had become a generous indolence. But minds were waking up to this. Over our table at St Ermin’s Hotel wrangle Maxse, Bellairs, Hewins, Amery and Mackinder, all stung by the small but humiliating tale of disasters in the South African war, all sensitive to the threat of business recession, and all profoundly alarmed by the naval and military aggressiveness of Germany.”
Fearful of the prospect of a US-Russia-China alliance outlined in depth by Fabian/Roundtable members Halford Mackinder and Lord Alfred Milner, the solution was simple: kick over the chess board and get everyone to just slaughter each other. Accounts of the British imperial efforts to orchestrate this war have been told in many locations, but none as efficiently as the 2008 documentary 1932: Speak Not of Parties.
In the wake of the destruction which left 9 million dead on all sides and ruined countless lives, Wells, Russell and the Milner Roundtable became leading voices for world government under the League of Nations (c. 1919) advocating “enlightened cosmopolitanism” to replace the era of “selfish nation states”.
The Battle For World Government
A decade after its founding, the League was less successful than Wells and his co-thinkers would have liked, with nationalists from around the world recognizing the evil hand of empire lurking behind the apparent language of “liberal values and world peace”. Sun Yat-sen, among many others was among the anti-Wellsian voices and warned his fellow Chinese in 1924 not to fall into this trap saying:
“The nations which are employing imperialism to conquer others and which are trying to maintain their own favored positions as sovereign lords of the whole world are advocating cosmopolitanism [aka: global governance/globalization -ed] and want the world to join them… Nationalism is that precious possession by which humanity maintains its existence. If nationalism decays, then when cosmopolitanism flourishes we will be unable to survive and will be eliminated”.
In response to this patriotic resistance across the world, a new strategy had to be concocted. This took the form of H.G. Welles’ 1928 The Open Conspiracy: Blueprint for a World Revolution. This little-known book served as a guiding blueprint for the next century of imperial grand strategy calling for a new world religion and social order. According to Wells:
“The old faiths have become unconvincing, unsubstantial and insincere, and though there are clear intimations of a new faith in the world, it still awaits embodiment in formulae and organizations that will bring it into effective reaction upon human affairs as a whole.”
In his book, Welles outlines the need for a new scientific gospel to supersede the Judeo-Christian faiths of the western world. This new gospel consisted of a series of tomes which he and his colleague Julian Huxley composed, entitled: 1) The Outline of History (1920) where Wells re-wrote all of history wishing this analysis to replace the book of Genesis, 2)The Science of Life (1930), co-written with Sir Julian Huxley (Thomas Huxley’s Grandson who continued the family tradition along with Aldous), and 3) The Work, Wealth and Happiness of Mankind (1932).
Part of this immense project to create a new coherent synthetic religion to re-organize humanity involved a re-packaging of a Darwinism that was falling out of favor with many scientists of the 1920’s. They recognized its failure to account for obvious features of nature such as directionality in evolution, spirit, intention, ideas and design.
This re-packaging took the form of the “New Evolutionary Synthesis” which attempted to save Darwin’s theory and its eugenic corollaries using Jesuit priest Pierre Teilhard de Chardin’s doctrine of the “Omega Man”. De Chardin’s system synthesized the foundation of Darwinian assumptions with an acknowledgment of evolutionary directionality, the possibility of spirit, and the existence of mind as a force of nature. The destructive slight of hand used by Chardin was that all of these “transcendent” features of design- spirit, mind, reason, etc.- were: 1) bound to a finite future point of no change which dominated and guided all apparent change in living space time, and 2) binding the world of mind and spirit to the forces of the material world. The Chardin-Huxley-Wells remix kept Darwin’s laws relevant and kept science compatible with imperial modes of social organization.
Outlining the aims of The Open Conspiracy, Wells writes: “Firstly, the entirely provisional nature of all existing governments, and the entirely provisional nature therefore, of all loyalties associated therewith; Secondly, the supreme importance of population control in human biology and the possibility it affords us of a release from the pressure of the struggle for existence on ourselves; and Thirdly, the urgent necessity of protective resistance against the present traditional drift towards war.”
By 1933, the planned Bankers’ Dictatorship, meant to solve the four years’ long great depression and organized during the months-long London Conference, was on the verge of being sabotaged by the recently-elected American President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. It was then that Wells published a new manifesto in the form of a fiction book called ‘Shape of Things to Come: The Ultimate Revolution’. This book (soon made into a Hollywood movie), served as an early tool of mass predictive programming showcasing a world destroyed by decades of global war, pandemic, and anarchy- all caused by… sovereign nation states.
The “solution” to these dark ages took the form of a masonic society of social engineers who descended from planes (Wells’ ‘Benevolent Dictatorship of the Air’) to restore order under a world government. Wells had his main character (a social psychologist) state “while the World Council was fighting for and directing and carrying on the unified World State, the Educational Control was remoulding mankind”. The social psychologists managing the World Government were “becoming the whole literature, philosophy and general thought of the world… the reasoning soul in the body of the race.”
The greatest problem to overcome, stated Wells, was “the variability of mental resistance to direction and limits set by nature to the ideal of an acquiescent cooperative world.”
Wells’ hero, Gustav de Windt, was “pre-occupied by his gigantic schemes for world organization, had treated the ‘spirit of opposition’ as purely evil, as a vice to be guarded against, as a trouble in the machinery which was to be minimized as completely as possible.”
In 1932, Wells gave an Oxford speech championing a global order run by liberal fascists saying: “I am asking for liberal Fascisti, for enlightened Nazis”. This was not paradoxical when one realizes that the rise of fascism was never a “nationalist” phenomenon as popular history books have asserted for decades but rather was the artificial consequence of a supranational financier-oligarchy from above who wished to use “enforcers” to bend their societies to a higher will.
The World Brain
By the time World War II began, Wells’ ideas had evolved new insidious components that later gave rise to such mechanisms as Wikipedia and Twitter in the form of “The World Brain” (19937) where Wells calls for reducing the English language to a “basic English” of 850 accepted words which would make up a world language. In this book, Wells states that “thinkers of the forward-looking type whose ideas we are now considering, are beginning to realize that the most hopeful line for the development of our racial intelligence lies rather in the direction of creating a new world organ for the collection, indexing, summarizing and release of knowledge, than in any further tinkering with the highly conservative and resistant university system, local, national and traditional in texture, which already exits. These innovators, who may be dreamers today, but who hope to become very active organizers tomorrow, project a unified, if not centralized, world organ to pull the mind of the world together.”
By 1940, Wells wrote the The New World Order which again amplified his message. In writing this, he coordinated his efforts with the many Fabians and Rhodes Scholars who had infiltrated western foreign policy establishments in order to shape the the war, but more importantly, the post-war global structure. These were the networks that hated Franklin Roosevelt, Vice-President Henry Wallace, Harry Hopkins and other genuine “New Dealers” who wanted nothing more than to destroy colonialism once and for all in the wake of the war.
Wells insists that the “new age of brotherhood” that must guide the new United Nations must not tolerate sovereign nation states as FDR dreamed (and as was formally enshrined in the UN Charter) but must rather be guided by his caste of social engineers pulling the levers of production and consumption within a system of mass “collectivization” saying:
“Collectivisation means the handling of the common affairs of mankind by a common control responsible to the whole community. It means the suppression of go-as-you-please in social and economic affairs just as much as in international affairs. It means the frank abolition of profit-seeking and of every device by which human beings contrive to be parasitic on their fellow man. It is the practical realisation of the brotherhood of man through a common control”.
If Wells’ outlines look similar to those ideas recently made public by the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset, then don’t be surprised.
Wells’ Death and the Continuity of a Bad Idea
With Wells’ 1946 death, other Fabians and social engineers continued his work during the Cold War. One of the leading figures here being Wells’ associate, Lord Bertrand Russell, who wrote in his 1952 The Impact of Science on Society:
“I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is mass psychology…. Its importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Of these the most influential is what is called ‘education’. Religion plays a part, though a diminishing one; the press, the cinema and the radio play an increasing part… it may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the state with money and equipment.”
“The subject will make great strides when it is taken up by scientists under a scientific dictatorship. The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at. First that the influence of home is obstructive. Second that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten. Thirdly verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective. Fourth that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity. But I anticipate. It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black, and how much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark gray.”
Although the bodies of Wells, Russell and Huxley have long since rotted away, their rotten ideas continue to animate their disciples like Sir Henry Kissinger, George Soros, Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, Lord Malloch-Brown (whose disturbing celebration of the Coronavirus as a golden opportunity to finally restructure civilization) should concern any thinking citizen. The idea of a “Great Reset” expounded by these modern mouthpieces of history’s bad ideas signals nothing more than a new Dark Age which should turn the stomach of any moral being.
It is here useful to hold the words of Kissinger in mind who had channeled the spectre of Wells telling a group of technocrats in Evian, France in 1992:
“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”
From the Strategic Culture Foundation
Matthew Ehret is the Editor-in-Chief of the Canadian Patriot Review , Senior Fellow at the American University in Moscow, BRI Expert on Tactical talk, and has authored 3 volumes of ‘Untold History of Canada’ book series. In 2019 he co-founded the Montreal-based Rising Tide Foundation. He can be reached at matt.ehret@tutamail.com
Read Later Add to Favourites Add to Collection Report