theduran--2020-12-02--NATO to Plan U.S. Invasion of China

NATO to Plan U.S. Invasion of China

On November 27th , Germany ’ s Spiegel magazine , which is a reliable propaganda organ for America ’ s NATO military alliance against Russia , headlined ( in German but autotranslated here ) “ Explosive reform proposals for NATO : There is life after ‘ brain death ’ ” , and made only passing mention there of NATO ’ s plan ultimately to ‘ defend Europe against China ’ ( and not only against Russia ) ; but , on December 1st , Russia ’ s Tass News Agency headlined more informatively and honestly , “ China to become @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Russia in next 10 years , report says ” .
So : NATO ’ s coming second coming , or life after ‘ brain death ’ ( which was Macron ’ s phrase for NATO ) , will be for it to ratchet-up , from one central target for its aggressions , to two central targets .
As I have extensively documented in analyzing the data to determine “ Is the U.S. actually a ‘ police state ’ ?
” , today ’ s United States isn ’ t merely ‘ a ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s leading police state , and yet its European allies — which are far less dictatorial — continue , obliviously , to ignore this reality .
They refuse to quit their alliance with the world ’ s leading police state .
They claim that they have to keep their alliance with the world ’ s leading police state , in order to ‘ protect ’ themselves against ‘ Russian aggression ’ , but the only example they cite of such ‘ aggression ’ is Russia ’ s having resisted the U.S. regime @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in effect by no later than June of 2013 , to grab Russia ’ s main naval base , which was , ever since 1783 ( and still remains ) in Sevastopol in Crimea , which then was in Ukraine ( though only from 1954 to 2014 , and inside Russia for hundreds of years before 1954 ) , and to turn it into yet another U.S. naval base .
Russia ’ s having taken the necessary self-defensive actions to prevent that grab by the U.S. regime was ‘ Russian aggression ’ .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to their respective publics .
NATO is strictly a military organization to boost military spending in U.S.-allied countries — the U.S. regime ’ s vassal nations — so that the profits of ( mainly U.S.-based ) military contractors such as Lockheed Martin and BAE will be boosted , at the expense of the deceived publics of European nations ( as well as of America ’ s own population ) , which publics pay in their tax dollars for this boondoggle for those huge U.S.-and-allied armaments firms .
To put it simply : NATO @ @ @ @ @ @ @ benefit of owners of U.S.-and-allied armaments contractors — the manufacturers of the weaponries of war .
However , NATO is actually more than that .
For example , the lists of top donors to NATO ’ s main PR arm , The Atlantic Council , such as in 2018 and in 2020 , show — either by name , or by a corporation or foundation that is controlled by beneficiaries of the work of this sales-promotion organization for warfare — practically all U.S-and-allied billionaires , but also include some mere centi-millionaires ( such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Myer Feldman , had negotiated U.S. arms-sales to Israel , then founded a major law firm , and — with his key government contacts — became a very successful investor ) .
A large portion of the U.S. economy is controlled by beneficiaries of the firms that sell to U.S.-and-allied governments , and many of them ( unlike Feldman , who instead merely worked for billionaires ) are heirs of America ’ s famous aristocratic families .
These annual payments ( tax-deductible donations ) to NATO ’ s main PR arm are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ charity that benefits the public or anyone much outside U.S.-and-allied aristocracies .
Instead , this is payment for services rendered , just as much as in any non non-profit corporation , such as ExxonMobil or Lockheed Martin ( except : these are tax-deductible payments ) .
So , even these payments to a ‘ non-profit ’ are actually payments for services rendered to themselves .
They are sound business investments for these individuals , some of whom are even in NATO ’ s target-countries ( instead of in its member-countries ) and might @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as exceptions if and when their countries become invaded by NATO ( those donations might thus be considered as protection-money ) .
An example , in the list of top donors in 2019 , “ $ 500,000 – $ 999,999 Donations , ” which has three listees there , is “ System Capital Management , ” which is the Ukrainian Rinat Akhmetov , $ 6.4 billion .
His coal mines were in the breakaway far-eastern Donbass part of Ukraine , which he didn ’ t want to lose , and so he was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ defending themselves against the frequent invasions from the 2014 U.S.-supplied Ukrainian stooge regime , which was trying to conquer them .
So , Akhmetov is , though in different ways , helping to fund both sides in that conflict .
Also in that “ $ 500,000 – $ 999,999 ” category is “ Saab North America , Inc. , ” which is Kai Johan Jiang , of both Sweden and China .
And the third entity there , a Swiss firm ( and Switzerland isn ’ t even a NATO member but instead @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , provides more than 85 % of the world ’ s currency inks ” , and this product is in people ’ s wallets as a result of their government ’ s paying that corporation — so , maintaining favorable relations with U.S-and-allied governments is important , there , as well , even though the ink that is used to prevent counterfeiting isn ’ t specifically military .
But most of the major donors to the Atlantic Council are U.S. billionaires and their organizations , and are specifically military-related .
Funding both sides @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for billionaires , because protection money is sometimes a necessary expense in a business — especially in an international one .
All of these people need to stay on the ‘ good ’ side of NATO , because , if they fail to do that , then they might lose everything , and they know it .
Donating to the Atlantic Council buys not only a type of insurance policy , but a tax-write-off , and also prestige .
The newly issued NATO report , “ NATO 2030 ” , opens its “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Chinese power and global reach poses acute challenges to open and democratic societies , particularly because of that country ’ s trajectory to greater authoritarianism and an expansion of its territorial ambitions .
For most Allies , China is both an economic competitor and significant trade partner .
China is therefore best understood as a full-spectrum systemic rival , rather than a purely economic player or an only Asia-focused security actor .
While China does not pose an immediate military threat to the Euro-Atlantic area on the scale of Russia , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Atlantic , Mediterranean , and Arctic , deepening defence ties with Russia , and developing long-range missiles and aircraft , aircraft carriers , and nuclear-attack submarines with global reach , extensive space-based capabilities , and a larger nuclear arsenal .
NATO Allies feel China ’ s influence more and more in every domain .
NATO is a treaty-organization , and therefore its decision to invade a country is made by one-or more of its member-nations .
Its first invasion was in violation of NATO ’ s Charter because no member-nation had been attacked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ requested NATO into the Bosnian War on 6 February 1994 , which the U.N. did because the U.N. wanted to invade but the Truman-shaped U.N. lacks the military forces that FDR had intended it to have — Truman wanted the U.S. Government to be the policeman of the world , not the U.N. to be that .
So : this invasion violated not only Truman ’ s NATO but FDR ’ s U.N. , and it reflected the fundamental lawlessness of the international order in this Truman-made world , despite all of FDR @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s second invasion was when the U.N. requested NATO into the Croatian War of Independence on 19 November 1994 .
Again , both the Atlantic Charter and FDR ’ s intentions for the U.N. were being violated ; so , the Truman-created international lawlessness was reaffirmed .
NATO ’ s third invasion was of Kosovo , when “ On 13 April 1999 , NATO approved plans for Operation Allied Harbour , a 10,000-troop NATO deployment to support humanitarian relief efforts for refugees resulting from the Serb expulsion of ethnic Albanians from Kosovo.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ humanitarian ’ invasion — also violated both the Atlantic Charter and the U.N. Charter , but , this time , the U.N. had not requested the action ; and , so , that is why the U.N. ’ s 23 October 2000 “ Kosovo Report ” made explicit this U.N. ’ s absurdity and irrelevance by asserting “ The Commission concludes that the NATO military intervention was illegal but legitimate.
” After that — regarding America and some of its NATO allies invading and conquering Iraq in 2003 , and many other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Yugoslavia — brought out into the open this U.N. ’ s absurdity and irrelevance .
NATO ’ s first invasions occurred after the Soviet Union itself ended .
The reason for this is that , until that happened in 1991 , NATO wasn ’ t able to invade without possibly thereby sparking a nuclear World War III , which would destroy the entire world — including the U.S .
The post-1991 mono-polar geostrategic world is the world of endless wars , endless invasions by the U.S. to impose its will throughout the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nuclearly armed nation , such as Russia or China , would be fundamentally different than NATO ’ s prior invasions .
NATO will actually be irrelevant to attacking Russia or China , except for its allowing America to post in its NATO vassal-nations U.S.-controlled nuclear weapons and therefore to cause any retaliation against an American nuclear attack to become a retaliatory counter-attack against not only America , but also against any such vassal-nation .
In other words : any decision , on the U.S. side , to launch World War III , will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the U.S. President himself or herself .
The NATO Charter ( the Atlantic Charter ) is no actual defense against anything , but it is , instead , the subservience of all non-U.S. members to the collective will of the U.S. aristocracy , and-or , of any idiotic or perhaps power-crazed U.S. President ( such as George W. Bush , Barack Obama , and Donald Trump ) , the person who actually makes that decision .
Regarding the possibility that either Russia or China will launch WW III , it is zero , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ routinely coup-conquered , or outright invaded and destroyed , nations , is — and after WW II has always been — only the United States .
The list is long : Thailand 1948 , Syria 1949 , Iran 1953 , Guatemala 1954 , and all the way up till Iraq 2003 , Libya 2011 , Syria 2012- , Ukraine 2014 , and others .
Right now , NATO ’ s hope to deceive their publics to believe that China ’ s Government during the modern ( post-dynasties ) era is an aggressive , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what had long been parts of China , such as Hong Kong , Taiwan , and Tibet .
However , back at the end of World War II , when the ambivalent but basically neoconservative ( i.e.
, U.S. imperialistic ) American President Harry S. Truman endorsed the Chinese “ nationalists ” under Chiang Kai-shek , America was endorsing those nationalists ’ claims to all of those traditionally Chinese territories — including claims that were then being challenged by other U.S. allies , such as UK ( Hong Kong ) .
In other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ China ’ s civil war on 1 October 1949 against the U.S.-backed nationalist Chinese , America was supporting instead of opposing China ’ s getting back the territories that it had lost ; but , afterward , it opposed that , as being ‘ Chinese aggression ’ .
Now , NATO will be moving in , to intensify America ’ s aggressions against China .
During the periods of hereditary monarchs ruling in China and in Russia , there was such a thing as “ Russian imperialism ” and as “ Chinese imperialism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over , and now the only real threat to the entire world is the U.S. Government .
To be allied with it is to be a part of that imperialism , which is extremely real today — far more real than ‘ Russian imperialism ’ or than ‘ Chinese imperialism ’ .
To be a part of that hyper-aggressive imperialism , which exists today , is to be a U.S.-stooge regime in international relations , and is therefore to be subject to whatever retaliation will come from any nuclearly armed independent nation such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the event that the U.S. regime will decide that the time has finally come to execute its unofficial but ( since at least 2006 ) overarching geostrategic goal of winning WW III against both Russia and China ( called “ Nuclear Primacy ” ) so that it will rule the entire world as its realm , unchallenged and unchallengeable .
If they believe in that , then it certainly isn ’ t for the benefit of their public , even if it might be for their own benefit , in profits of firms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only on sales to the U.S. Government and to the Governments that are allied to it ) that they own , or benefit from in other ways .
For example , since 2014 , Amazon Web Services has supplied to the U.S. Government ( CIA , Pentagon , NSA , etc . )
its cloud-computing services , which has since produced virtually all of Amazon ’ s profits ( also see “ Cloud Business Drives Amazon ’ s Profits ” ) , though Amazon doesn ’ t even so much as show up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the U.S. Government ; so , this extremely profitable business is more important to Jeff Bezos ( the owner also of the Washington Post ) than all the rest of his investments put together are , though Amazon doesn ’ t even show up on the list of top 100 U.S. Government contractors .
In fact , more recently , Forbes reported that “ Amazon Derives Most of its Profits from AWS ” .
A company doesn ’ t have to be among the top 100 sellers to the U.S. Government in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even the majority of its profits from the U.S. Government .
But this is a reason why the U.S. Government now spends approximately half of the entire planet ’ s military expenses .
And to own also a major news-medium , such as the Washington Post ( which has a long tradition of backing U.S. coups and invasions ) , places one in the position to shape the public ’ s perceptions , and not merely to profit from them .
NATO was supposed not to take on any new members after the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its communism , and ended its Warsaw Pact which had been created in 1955 in response to America ’ s having created NATO in 1949 ; and which nation — the Soviet Union — itself broke up into 6 independent nations : Russia , Belorussia , Ukraine , Georgia , Azerbaijan , and Armenia .
But the U.S. regime was simply lying about its intentions during that crucial period from 1989 to 1991 , and now has absorbed all of the Warsaw Pact into its NATO alliance against Russia , and is even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s 5 non-Russian states into its alliance to help conquer Russia — and , now , also to conquer China .
If the U.S. Government had not been negotiating in bad faith back in 1990 , it would simply have ended its anti-Russian alliance immediately , when the Warsaw Pact ended in 1991 .
But , now , it is instead set upon expanding , so as to conquer the entire world , for the U.S. aristocracy .
None of this is in the standard propagandistic ‘ history ’ books , and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ included in any that get mass distribution .
( For example , none of them mention that the Cold War was started by U.S. President Truman , upon the advice of General Dwight Eisenhower , on 26 July 1945 . )
By the time the public will know it ( if that ever happens ) , it might already be too late .
NATO ’ s now planning to invade China ought to be a wake-up call , but how many people , in the countries that are controlled by the U.S. regime @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is happening , and has already happened ?
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author , most recently , of They ’ re Not Even Close : The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records , 1910-2010 , and of CHRIST ’ S VENTRILOQUISTS : The Event that Created Christianity .

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
Eric Zuesse
On November 27th, Germany’s Spiegel magazine, which is a reliable propaganda organ for America’s NATO military alliance against Russia, headlined (in German but autotranslated here) “Explosive reform proposals for NATO: There is life after ‘brain death’”, and made only passing mention there of NATO’s plan ultimately to ‘defend Europe against China’ (and not only against Russia); but, on December 1st, Russia’s Tass News Agency headlined more informatively and honestly, “China to become NATO’s second main enemy after Russia in next 10 years, report says”. So: NATO’s coming second coming, or life after ‘brain death’ (which was Macron’s phrase for NATO), will be for it to ratchet-up, from one central target for its aggressions, to two central targets.
As I have extensively documented in analyzing the data to determine “Is the U.S. actually a ‘police state’?”, today’s United States isn’t merely ‘a’ police state, but is the world’s leading police state, and yet its European allies — which are far less dictatorial — continue, obliviously, to ignore this reality. They refuse to quit their alliance with the world’s leading police state. They claim that they have to keep their alliance with the world’s leading police state, in order to ‘protect’ themselves against ‘Russian aggression’, but the only example they cite of such ‘aggression’ is Russia’s having resisted the U.S. regime’s plan, which was clearly in effect by no later than June of 2013, to grab Russia’s main naval base, which was, ever since 1783 (and still remains) in Sevastopol in Crimea, which then was in Ukraine (though only from 1954 to 2014, and inside Russia for hundreds of years before 1954), and to turn it into yet another U.S. naval base. Russia’s having taken the necessary self-defensive actions to prevent that grab by the U.S. regime was ‘Russian aggression’. Europe’s leaders are simply lying to their respective publics. NATO is strictly a military organization to boost military spending in U.S.-allied countries — the U.S. regime’s vassal nations — so that the profits of (mainly U.S.-based) military contractors such as Lockheed Martin and BAE will be boosted, at the expense of the deceived publics of European nations (as well as of America’s own population), which publics pay in their tax dollars for this boondoggle for those huge U.S.-and-allied armaments firms. To put it simply: NATO is an enormous sales-promotion organization for the benefit of owners of U.S.-and-allied armaments contractors — the manufacturers of the weaponries of war.
However, NATO is actually more than that. For example, the lists of top donors to NATO’s main PR arm, The Atlantic Council, such as in 2018 and in 2020, show — either by name, or by a corporation or foundation that is controlled by beneficiaries of the work of this sales-promotion organization for warfare — practically all U.S-and-allied billionaires, but also include some mere centi-millionaires (such as Adrienne Arsht, whose late husband, Myer Feldman, had negotiated U.S. arms-sales to Israel, then founded a major law firm, and — with his key government contacts — became a very successful investor). A large portion of the U.S. economy is controlled by beneficiaries of the firms that sell to U.S.-and-allied governments, and many of them (unlike Feldman, who instead merely worked for billionaires) are heirs of America’s famous aristocratic families. These annual payments (tax-deductible donations) to NATO’s main PR arm are ‘charitable’ but no type of charity that benefits the public or anyone much outside U.S.-and-allied aristocracies. Instead, this is payment for services rendered, just as much as in any non non-profit corporation, such as ExxonMobil or Lockheed Martin (except: these are tax-deductible payments). So, even these payments to a ‘non-profit’ are actually payments for services rendered to themselves. They are sound business investments for these individuals, some of whom are even in NATO’s target-countries (instead of in its member-countries) and might help those billionaires to receive favorable treatment as exceptions if and when their countries become invaded by NATO (those donations might thus be considered as protection-money). An example, in the list of top donors in 2019, “$500,000 – $999,999 Donations,” which has three listees there, is “System Capital Management,” which is the Ukrainian Rinat Akhmetov, $6.4 billion. His coal mines were in the breakaway far-eastern Donbass part of Ukraine, which he didn’t want to lose, and so he was helping to fund those people who were defending themselves against the frequent invasions from the 2014 U.S.-supplied Ukrainian stooge regime, which was trying to conquer them. So, Akhmetov is, though in different ways, helping to fund both sides in that conflict. Also in that “$500,000 – $999,999” category is “Saab North America, Inc.,” which is Kai Johan Jiang, of both Sweden and China. And the third entity there, a Swiss firm (and Switzerland isn’t even a NATO member but instead ‘neutral’), “SICPA, provides more than 85% of the world’s currency inks”, and this product is in people’s wallets as a result of their government’s paying that corporation — so, maintaining favorable relations with U.S-and-allied governments is important, there, as well, even though the ink that is used to prevent counterfeiting isn’t specifically military. But most of the major donors to the Atlantic Council are U.S. billionaires and their organizations, and are specifically military-related.
Funding both sides in a war isn’t unusual for billionaires, because protection money is sometimes a necessary expense in a business — especially in an international one.
All of these people need to stay on the ‘good’ side of NATO, because, if they fail to do that, then they might lose everything, and they know it. Donating to the Atlantic Council buys not only a type of insurance policy, but a tax-write-off, and also prestige.
The newly issued NATO report, “NATO 2030”, opens its “China” section with:
The scale of Chinese power and global reach poses acute challenges to open and democratic societies, particularly because of that country’s trajectory to greater authoritarianism and an expansion of its territorial ambitions. For most Allies, China is both an economic competitor and significant trade partner. China is therefore best understood as a full-spectrum systemic rival, rather than a purely economic player or an only Asia-focused security actor. While China does not pose an immediate military threat to the Euro-Atlantic area on the scale of Russia, it is expanding its military reach into the Atlantic, Mediterranean, and Arctic, deepening defence ties with Russia, and developing long-range missiles and aircraft, aircraft carriers, and nuclear-attack submarines with global reach, extensive space-based capabilities, and a larger nuclear arsenal. NATO Allies feel China’s influence more and more in every domain.
NATO is a treaty-organization, and therefore its decision to invade a country is made by one-or more of its member-nations. Its first invasion was in violation of NATO’s Charter because no member-nation had been attacked, and this was when the U.N. requested NATO into the Bosnian War on 6 February 1994, which the U.N. did because the U.N. wanted to invade but the Truman-shaped U.N. lacks the military forces that FDR had intended it to have — Truman wanted the U.S. Government to be the policeman of the world, not the U.N. to be that. So: this invasion violated not only Truman’s NATO but FDR’s U.N., and it reflected the fundamental lawlessness of the international order in this Truman-made world, despite all of FDR’s plans and intentions.
NATO’s second invasion was when the U.N. requested NATO into the Croatian War of Independence on 19 November 1994. Again, both the Atlantic Charter and FDR’s intentions for the U.N. were being violated; so, the Truman-created international lawlessness was reaffirmed.
NATO’s third invasion was of Kosovo, when “On 13 April 1999, NATO approved plans for Operation Allied Harbour, a 10,000-troop NATO deployment to support humanitarian relief efforts for refugees resulting from the Serb expulsion of ethnic Albanians from Kosovo.” This — NATO’s first ‘humanitarian’ invasion — also violated both the Atlantic Charter and the U.N. Charter, but, this time, the U.N. had not requested the action; and, so, that is why the U.N.’s 23 October 2000 “Kosovo Report” made explicit this U.N.’s absurdity and irrelevance by asserting “The Commission concludes that the NATO military intervention was illegal but legitimate.”
After that — regarding America and some of its NATO allies invading and conquering Iraq in 2003, and many other U.S. international gangland operations after the breakup of Yugoslavia — brought out into the open this U.N.’s absurdity and irrelevance.
NATO’s first invasions occurred after the Soviet Union itself ended. The reason for this is that, until that happened in 1991, NATO wasn’t able to invade without possibly thereby sparking a nuclear World War III, which would destroy the entire world — including the U.S. The post-1991 mono-polar geostrategic world is the world of endless wars, endless invasions by the U.S. to impose its will throughout the world — especially in Russia and in nations that aren’t hostile toward Russia.
The decision to invade a nuclearly armed nation, such as Russia or China, would be fundamentally different than NATO’s prior invasions. NATO will actually be irrelevant to attacking Russia or China, except for its allowing America to post in its NATO vassal-nations U.S.-controlled nuclear weapons and therefore to cause any retaliation against an American nuclear attack to become a retaliatory counter-attack against not only America, but also against any such vassal-nation. In other words: any decision, on the U.S. side, to launch World War III, will be made by only one person, the U.S. President himself or herself. The NATO Charter (the Atlantic Charter) is no actual defense against anything, but it is, instead, the subservience of all non-U.S. members to the collective will of the U.S. aristocracy, and-or, of any idiotic or perhaps power-crazed U.S. President (such as George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump), the person who actually makes that decision.
Regarding the possibility that either Russia or China will launch WW III, it is zero, because the imperialistic power, which has routinely coup-conquered, or outright invaded and destroyed, nations, is — and after WW II has always been — only the United States. The list of coups or invasions is long: Thailand 1948, Syria 1949, Iran 1953, Guatemala 1954, and all the way up till Iraq 2003, Libya 2011, Syria 2012-, Ukraine 2014, and others.
Right now, NATO’s hope to deceive their publics to believe that China’s Government during the modern (post-dynasties) era is an aggressive, imperialistic, Government, are issues concerning what had long been parts of China, such as Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Tibet. However, back at the end of World War II, when the ambivalent but basically neoconservative (i.e., U.S. imperialistic) American President Harry S. Truman endorsed the Chinese “nationalists” under Chiang Kai-shek, America was endorsing those nationalists’ claims to all of those traditionally Chinese territories — including claims that were then being challenged by other U.S. allies, such as UK (Hong Kong). In other words: before the communist Chinese won China’s civil war on 1 October 1949 against the U.S.-backed nationalist Chinese, America was supporting instead of opposing China’s getting back the territories that it had lost; but, afterward, it opposed that, as being ‘Chinese aggression’. Now, NATO will be moving in, to intensify America’s aggressions against China.
During the periods of hereditary monarchs ruling in China and in Russia, there was such a thing as “Russian imperialism” and as “Chinese imperialism,” but those days are long-since over, and now the only real threat to the entire world is the U.S. Government. To be allied with it is to be a part of that imperialism, which is extremely real today — far more real than ‘Russian imperialism’ or than ‘Chinese imperialism’. To be a part of that hyper-aggressive imperialism, which exists today, is to be a U.S.-stooge regime in international relations, and is therefore to be subject to whatever retaliation will come from any nuclearly armed independent nation such as Russia and such as China in the event that the U.S. regime will decide that the time has finally come to execute its unofficial but (since at least 2006) overarching geostrategic goal of winning WW III against both Russia and China (called “Nuclear Primacy”) so that it will rule the entire world as its realm, unchallenged and unchallengeable. If they believe in that, then it certainly isn’t for the benefit of their public, even if it might be for their own benefit, in profits of firms (ones whose profits depend mainly or only on sales to the U.S. Government and to the Governments that are allied to it) that they own, or benefit from in other ways. For example, since 2014, Amazon Web Services has supplied to the U.S. Government (CIA, Pentagon, NSA, etc.) its cloud-computing services, which has since produced virtually all of Amazon’s profits (also see “Cloud Business Drives Amazon’s Profits”), though Amazon doesn’t even so much as show up on that list of 100 top contractors to the U.S. Government; so, this extremely profitable business is more important to Jeff Bezos (the owner also of the Washington Post) than all the rest of his investments put together are, though Amazon doesn’t even show up on the list of top 100 U.S. Government contractors. In fact, more recently, Forbes reported that “Amazon Derives Most of its Profits from AWS”. A company doesn’t have to be among the top 100 sellers to the U.S. Government in order to be making, perhaps, even the majority of its profits from the U.S. Government. But this is a reason why the U.S. Government now spends approximately half of the entire planet’s military expenses. And to own also a major news-medium, such as the Washington Post (which has a long tradition of backing U.S. coups and invasions), places one in the position to shape the public’s perceptions, and not merely to profit from them.
NATO was supposed not to take on any new members after the Soviet Union, in 1991, ended its communism, and ended its Warsaw Pact which had been created in 1955 in response to America’s having created NATO in 1949; and which nation — the Soviet Union — itself broke up into 6 independent nations: Russia, Belorussia, Ukraine, Georgia, Azerbaijan, and Armenia. But the U.S. regime was simply lying about its intentions during that crucial period from 1989 to 1991, and now has absorbed all of the Warsaw Pact into its NATO alliance against Russia, and is even trying to get the Soviet Union’s 5 non-Russian states into its alliance to help conquer Russia — and, now, also to conquer China. If the U.S. Government had not been negotiating in bad faith back in 1990, it would simply have ended its anti-Russian alliance immediately, when the Warsaw Pact ended in 1991. But, now, it is instead set upon expanding, so as to conquer the entire world, for the U.S. aristocracy. None of this is in the standard propagandistic ‘history’ books, and the U.S. regime still prohibits it from being included in any that get mass distribution. (For example, none of them mention that the Cold War was started by U.S. President Truman, upon the advice of General Dwight Eisenhower, on 26 July 1945.) By the time the public will know it (if that ever happens), it might already be too late. NATO’s now planning to invade China ought to be a wake-up call, but how many people, in the countries that are controlled by the U.S. regime, even know that any of this is happening, and has already happened?
—————
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.
Read Later Add to Favourites Add to Collection Report


theduran--2020-12-02--Ted Cruz demands Supreme Court hear Pennsylvania case

Senator Ted Cruz has called on the Supreme Court to hear an emergency appeal on the Pennsylvania election discrepancies .
@ @ @ @ @ statement today : “ Today , an emergency appeal was filed in the U.S. Supreme @ @ @ @ @ in Pennsylvania .

Switch to the dark mode that's kinder on your eyes at night time.
Switch to the light mode that's kinder on your eyes at day time.


theduran--2020-12-02--Republican betrayal continues. Barr turns against Trump

NOTE : Since recording they video more news on this story : Barr Comments ‘ Twisted ’ By AP , DoJ Says Not Done Probing Election Fraud Barr Comments ‘ Twisted ’ By AP , DoJ Says Not Done Probing Election Fraud Authored by Ivan Pentchoukov via The Epoch Times , The Department of Justice ( DOJ ) issued a statement on Tuesday in response to the backlash from an article by The Associated Press which quoted Attorney General William Barr saying that “ to date , we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ House Slams AG Barr ’ s Claims Of No Election Fraud : “ There ’ s Been No Semblance Of A DoJ Investigation ” White House Slams AG Barr ’ s Claims Of No Election Fraud : “ There ’ s Been No Semblance Of A DoJ Investigation ” Update ( 1500ET ) : That did not take long .
The President ’ s lawyer Rudy Giuliani has issued a stateent : Statement of Trump Legal Team on Bill Barr ’ s Comments on Voter Fraud “ With all due respect to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been any semblance of a Department of Justice investigation .
Help us grow .
Support The Duran on Patreon !


theduran--2020-12-02--Australia demands China apologize. China refuses, doubles down on soldier tweet

Scott Morrison says China should be ‘ totally ashamed ’ of digitally-created image depicting Australian soldier posted by foreign ministry @ @ @ @ @ ministry has rejected calls from the Australian prime minister to apologise over an inflammatory tweet @ @ @ @ @ insisting it is Australia that should be saying sorry for the loss of life in @ @


theduran--2020-12-03--Georgia: Hold the line! Lin Wood and Sidney Powell

Brilliant , Lin Wood raised the roof at the “ Stop the Steal Rally ” in Georgia today .
They asked the republicans to fight the fraud and get out to vote for the republican senators , but only with a hand count .
Dominion systems are compromised .
Where are the RNC , where are the republican senators , where is the republican party ?
Show leadership , do your job !
!
Stand up and fight for the people who voted for you .
Why do Senators believe that it is for witnesses to prove to the legislature @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is not !
The mass of evidence that witnesses are providing is shocking .
There was no integrity and no controls in place to ensure chain of custody , they just did not exist .
The evidence clearly points to at best gross negligence or worse election fraud .
The eye witness evidence and expert testimony , that the chain of custody was consistently broken , is compelling , including strange statistical anomalies which are not explainable by human activity or “ computer errors ” .
The fact that the computers were connected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ computer connected to the internet is insecure , meaning the integrity can never be assured .
It is clear that there is no public confidence that the outcome reflects the will of the people .
It had no provable integrity .
This would be the focus of any independent auditors to ask what controls were in place to prove the chain of custody and the security of the election systems .
It is the legislature ’ s responsibility to ensure this , this is their job .
They are elected to do a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact that there were no controls in place to ensure and prove election integrity means that it can never be certified .
The election processes should be provable , secure and verifiable .
All these requirements have been shown to be non existent by eye witnesses .
Election officials shall prove , using verifiable evidence from the process controls , that the election integrity is and was secure .
If they can not , then the senators need to take immediate action to address the accusations being brought forward to prove they did @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prove election integrity , it is unacceptable legitimize the election certification .
If the Senators do not use the power that they have been granted by the voters then they will be complicit in negligence and/or fraud .
I recommend a class action lawsuit against the legislature , the governors and the secretary of states by voters , if if they take no remedial action !

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
source
Georgia Stop the Steal
Brilliant, Lin Wood raised the roof at the “Stop the Steal Rally” in Georgia today. They asked the republicans to fight the fraud and get out to vote for the republican senators, but only with a hand count. Dominion systems are compromised.
Where are the RNC, where are the republican senators, where is the republican party? Show leadership, do your job!! Stand up and fight for the people who voted for you.
Why do Senators believe that it is for witnesses to prove to the legislature that the election was fraudulent? It is not!
The mass of evidence that witnesses are providing is shocking. There was no integrity and no controls in place to ensure chain of custody, they just did not exist. The evidence clearly points to at best gross negligence or worse election fraud.
The eye witness evidence and expert testimony, that the chain of custody was consistently broken, is compelling, including strange statistical anomalies which are not explainable by human activity or “computer errors”. The fact that the computers were connected to the internet is scandalous, any computer connected to the internet is insecure, meaning the integrity can never be assured.
It is clear that there is no public confidence that the outcome reflects the will of the people. It had no provable integrity. This would be the focus of any independent auditors to ask what controls were in place to prove the chain of custody and the security of the election systems. It is the legislature’s responsibility to ensure this, this is their job. They are elected to do a job for the voters. The mere fact that there were no controls in place to ensure and prove election integrity means that it can never be certified.
The election processes should be provable, secure and verifiable. All these requirements have been shown to be non existent by eye witnesses. Election officials shall prove, using verifiable evidence from the process controls, that the election integrity is and was secure. If they cannot, then the senators need to take immediate action to address the accusations being brought forward to prove they did not happen! If they cannot prove election integrity, it is unacceptable legitimize the election certification. If the Senators do not use the power that they have been granted by the voters then they will be complicit in negligence and/or fraud. I recommend a class action lawsuit against the legislature, the governors and the secretary of states by voters, if if they take no remedial action!
Read Later Add to Favourites Add to Collection Report


theduran--2020-12-03--Bureaucrat Eileen “Cruella” De Villa send in police to do her bidding!

Are you obedient ?
Prove it !
On last night ’ s episode of The Ezra Levant Show , we looked at the authority granted to public health doctors like Eileen de Villa and Theresa Tam in controlling the rest of us under the guise of COVID-19 prevention .
Here ’ s a bit of what Ezra had to say : “ A doctor is like a lawyer , like any professional expert .
Un-elected official Eileen de Villa commands police enforce public obedience to her will , in a clear display of overreach of authority .
On last night @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Show , we looked at the authority granted to public health doctors like Eileen de Villa and Theresa Tam in controlling the rest of us under the guise of COVID-19 prevention .
Here ’ s a bit of what Ezra had to say : “ A doctor is like a lawyer , like any professional expert .
She gives advice ; and the patient , or client , gives instructions .
A doctor can tell you to lose weight , to stop smoking or drinking , lots of good advice .
But at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re a grown-up ; you can make the decision .
It ’ s part of freedom .
“ Well , de Villa has all the instincts of a doctor , telling people how to live .
And good for her , but they ’ re just opinions .
“ Unlike practicing doctors , though , she doesn ’ t have to convince people — she orders people .
I ’ ve never heard of a public health officer , ever , that isn ’ t authoritarian .
By nature , if you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the public health field , you are a control freak , you are someone who seeks to impose your will on everyone , and you are blinded by your own “ expertise ” .
” This is just an excerpt from the full Ezra Levant Show .
To watch the whole thing , become a subscriber to RebelNews+ .

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
Are you obedient? Prove it! On last night’s episode of The Ezra Levant Show , we looked at the authority granted to public health doctors like Eileen de Villa and Theresa Tam in controlling the rest of us under the guise of COVID-19 prevention. Here’s a bit of what Ezra had to say: “A doctor is like a lawyer, like any professional expert.
source
Un-elected official Eileen de Villa commands police enforce public obedience to her will, in a clear display of overreach of authority.
On last night’s episode of The Ezra Levant Show, we looked at the authority granted to public health doctors like Eileen de Villa and Theresa Tam in controlling the rest of us under the guise of COVID-19 prevention.
Here’s a bit of what Ezra had to say:
“A doctor is like a lawyer, like any professional expert. She gives advice; and the patient, or client, gives instructions. A doctor can tell you to lose weight, to stop smoking or drinking, lots of good advice. But at the end of the day, you’re a grown-up; you can make the decision. It’s part of freedom. “Well, de Villa has all the instincts of a doctor, telling people how to live. And good for her, but they’re just opinions. “Unlike practicing doctors, though, she doesn’t have to convince people — she orders people. I’ve never heard of a public health officer, ever, that isn’t authoritarian. By nature, if you’re a doctor and go into the public health field, you are a control freak, you are someone who seeks to impose your will on everyone, and you are blinded by your own “expertise”.”
This is just an excerpt from the full Ezra Levant Show.
To watch the whole thing, become a subscriber to RebelNews+.
Read Later Add to Favourites Add to Collection Report


theduran--2020-12-03--Alex Soros: A chip off the old block or the devil’s spawn?

The statements , views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily @ @ @ @ @ .


theduran--2020-12-03--#CNNTapes: CNN is Jeff Zucker’s Personal Propaganda Platform!

DECEMBER 01 , 2020 # CNNTapes Reveal Network ’ s Bias Against President Trump , Tucker Carlson … ‘ He [ Trump ] is Acting Erratically , and I Think We Need to Lean into That ’ … ‘ You Have to Talk About The Naked Racism of Tucker Carlson…White Supremacy Hour They Have on Fox News ’ • CNN President Jeff Zucker : “ This is a president who knows he ’ s losing , who knows he ’ s in trouble , is sick , maybe is on the aftereffects of steroids or not .
I don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ erratically and desperately , and we need to not normalize that.
” • Zucker : “ You know , this is what we ’ ve come to expect for the last three and a half years , four years , but it clearly is exacerbated by the time that we ’ re in and the issues that he ’ s [ Trump ] dealing with .
I think that we can not just let it be normalized .
He is all over the place and acting erratically , and I think we need @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : “ Frankly , if we ’ ve made any mistake , it ’ s been that our banners have been too polite , and we need to go well after Lindsey Graham.
” • Zucker : “ There ’ s a ton going on .
Let ’ s stay strong .
Let ’ s stay newsy .
Let ’ s stay urgent .
Let ’ s be smart .
There is a lot of news out there , and Lindsey Graham really deserves it.
” • David Vigilante , CNN General Counsel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going to say , if you ’ re going to talk about the story , I think it ’ s unavoidable that you have to talk about the naked racism of Tucker Carlson .
Because that ’ s really what drove this anti-diversity push , you know , Trump watches Tucker Carlson ’ s show and then reacts .
And just as sort of the white supremacy hour they have on Fox News every night , I think it ’ s the — You can ’ t disconnect the two.
” • Stephanie @ @ @ @ @ @ @ On the issue of why it ’ s important to get the transition going right , the 9-11 report talks about one of the problems was that the trouble that was brewing that lost during the transition .
So , if you want a good , concrete example of what happens when you don ’ t have a good transition , well , look at the Twin Towers.
” • James O ’ Keefe : “ This is yet another investigation Project Veritas has conducted into CNN , and once again they ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ total disconnect with journalistic ethics.
” [ WESTCHESTER , N.Y. – Dec. 1 , 2020 ] Project Veritas released new tapes today of CNN ’ s 9 a.m. rundown calls that have been recorded for months , which expose CNN president Jeff Zucker and several other CNN executives expressing their political biases against people and groups that oppose the network ’ s political agenda .


theduran--2020-12-03--Small Businesses Closing PERMANENTLY as Economy Shuts Down! Domino Effect in 2021

There is no chance in a restoration of the previous economy .
It was already weak as it was but this is just too much .
We have seen tremendous weakness in 2020 in the economy , only kept barely alive by a record level of stimulus which can not fix actual problems .
As a result , we are looking at a decimation of the mom and pop shops , the consolidation of big corporations , and the rise of the remaining few .
The economy will never be the same again .
ATLANTIC CITY , N.J. – The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deserted , and the casinos , though partially reopen , are limping into their fifth month of severely curtailed operations after four months of shutdowns .
The coronavirus pandemic skewered the economic engine of this beachside town , taking the city ’ s vibrancy and its residents ’ livelihoods out with it .
On Tennyson Street in Denver , mom-and-pop shops are dying amid Covid-19 A street in Denver sags under the weight of Covid-19 DENVER – When Covid-19 hit the U.S. in March , revenue at Alyssa Manny ’ s yoga studio @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And it wasn ’ t just her .
Nearly every business on Tennyson Street , in a gentrifying neighborhood about 15 minutes from downtown Denver , was hit hard by the pandemic .
Despite federal ban , renters still being evicted amid virus Despite federal ban , renters still being evicted amid virus BOSTON ( AP ) – A nationwide eviction ban was supposed to protect tenants like Tawanda Mormon , who was forced out of her two-bedroom apartment last month in Cleveland .
The 46-year-old , who was hospitalized in August for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ due to mental health issues , said she fell behind on her $ 500-a-month rent because she needed the money to pay for food .
Hawaii seeks to be seen as a remote workplace with a view Hawaii seeks to be seen as a remote workplace with a view HONOLULU ( AP ) – Software engineer Raymond Berger begins his work day at 5 a.m. , before the sun comes up over Hawaii .
Rising early is necessary because the company he works for is in New York City , five hours ahead @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a home with a backyard that ’ s near the beach .
Almost one-third of small businesses in New Jersey have have closed : report | TheHill Almost one-third of small businesses in New Jersey have have closed : report A third of small businesses in New Jersey have closed down in 2020 , according to a report from The Star-Ledger newspaper .
“ It ’ s really bad… And without federal dollars coming into New Jersey , the Main Street stores and other establishments are not gon na make it through the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Rising During The Recession “ Actual ” Inflation Is Rising During The Recession “ Actual ” consumer price inflation is rising during the recession .
That runs counter to the normal recessionary pattern when the combination of weak demand and excess capacity works to lessen inflationary pressures .
The main source of faster consumer price inflation is centered in the housing market .
The Case-Shiller In this issue of “ Market Risk Elevated Heading Into Distribution Season.
” I wanted to take a moment to say “ Thank You ” for your loyal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ produced a form of this newsletter for almost 20-years .
It ’ s incredible to see some of the same readers from the beginning .
The financial system has seen more enthusiasm as interest rates have declined .
More debt has been present on all levels .
Personal debt like credit cards and mortgages .
But also national debt and corporate debt .
We are seeing more purchases of stocks , tech stocks .
• The Money GPS : The Broken Economy Leaving Millions Without A Job !
Economic Crisis or Opportunity ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Banker Admits EPIC Level Crisis Is the Most Likely Result of Global Mass QE Wake up to the suits and ties .
They ’ re all lying to you .
None are your friends .
None wish to help you .
Wolves in sheep clothing .
More distractions than ever before .
The magician always makes a spectacle to hide the trick .
JANET YELLEN MIGHT BE BACK .
Anyone suggesting government took over the Fed and not the other way around needs to wake up .
Fed gained more control .
Even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the control over the public is very evident to those paying attention .
# janetyellen pic.twitter.com/2lHmrIHw0T HOW TO MAKE MONEY ON AMAZON – FREE eCOURSE : http : //TheAmazonGPS.com LOOK THROUGH MY BOOKS !
http : //books.themoneygps.com Sources Used in This Video : http : //bit.ly/TheMoneyGPSSources2020 The Money GPS – How To and Solutions How To Fix the Global Economy ( Instagram ) The Money GPS Financial Education 101 coming soon.100 % free eCourse for you to learn from but for those who already know the content , this is perfect to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ creating this course for people specifically to get the foundation # money # moneyGPS # financialeducation pic.twitter.com/nzqVVSSorT The Money GPS is the most active , most informative channel in the financial world .
Day after day , breaking down the data and making it easy to understand .
This channel is not here to help build a portfolio , give stock picks , or financial advice .
It ’ s simply data that is generally not found through conventional means .

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
source
There is no chance in a restoration of the previous economy. It was already weak as it was but this is just too much. We have seen tremendous weakness in 2020 in the economy, only kept barely alive by a record level of stimulus which cannot fix actual problems. As a result, we are looking at a decimation of the mom and pop shops, the consolidation of big corporations, and the rise of the remaining few. The economy will never be the same again.
City Without a Pulse – POLITICO
City Without a Pulse ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. – The boardwalk is empty, the beaches are deserted, and the casinos, though partially reopen, are limping into their fifth month of severely curtailed operations after four months of shutdowns. The coronavirus pandemic skewered the economic engine of this beachside town, taking the city’s vibrancy and its residents’ livelihoods out with it.
90 (2000×2007)
No Title No Description
90 (1999×652)
No Title No Description
On Tennyson Street in Denver, mom-and-pop shops are dying amid Covid-19
A street in Denver sags under the weight of Covid-19 DENVER – When Covid-19 hit the U.S. in March, revenue at Alyssa Manny’s yoga studio fell 60 percent to 70 percent. And it wasn’t just her. Nearly every business on Tennyson Street, in a gentrifying neighborhood about 15 minutes from downtown Denver, was hit hard by the pandemic.
Despite federal ban, renters still being evicted amid virus
Despite federal ban, renters still being evicted amid virus BOSTON (AP) – A nationwide eviction ban was supposed to protect tenants like Tawanda Mormon, who was forced out of her two-bedroom apartment last month in Cleveland. The 46-year-old, who was hospitalized in August for the coronavirus and can’t work due to mental health issues, said she fell behind on her $500-a-month rent because she needed the money to pay for food.
Hawaii seeks to be seen as a remote workplace with a view
Hawaii seeks to be seen as a remote workplace with a view HONOLULU (AP) – Software engineer Raymond Berger begins his work day at 5 a.m., before the sun comes up over Hawaii. Rising early is necessary because the company he works for is in New York City, five hours ahead of Maui, where he is renting a home with a backyard that’s near the beach.
Almost one-third of small businesses in New Jersey have have closed: report | TheHill
Almost one-third of small businesses in New Jersey have have closed: report A third of small businesses in New Jersey have closed down in 2020, according to a report from The Star-Ledger newspaper. “It’s really bad… And without federal dollars coming into New Jersey, the Main Street stores and other establishments are not gonna make it through the winter.”
“Actual” Inflation Is Rising During The Recession
“Actual” Inflation Is Rising During The Recession “Actual” consumer price inflation is rising during the recession. That runs counter to the normal recessionary pattern when the combination of weak demand and excess capacity works to lessen inflationary pressures. The main source of faster consumer price inflation is centered in the housing market. The Case-Shiller
ds-young-adults-living-with-parents.png (1200×1200)
No Title No Description
Market Risk Elevated Heading Into Distribution Season 11-27-20 – RIA
Market Risk Elevated Heading Into Distribution Season 11-27-20 – RIA In this issue of “Market Risk Elevated Heading Into Distribution Season.” I wanted to take a moment to say “Thank You” for your loyal readership of our newsletter. I have produced a form of this newsletter for almost 20-years. It’s incredible to see some of the same readers from the beginning.
Ensz0SgW4AAhVkO.jpg (1045×806)
No Title No Description
PutCall-Ratio.png (900×673)
No Title No Description
The financial system has seen more enthusiasm as interest rates have declined. More debt has been present on all levels. Personal debt like credit cards and mortgages. But also national debt and corporate debt. We are seeing more purchases of stocks, tech stocks.
— APPENDICES —
— FOOTNOTES —
No Title Wake up to the suits and ties. They’re all lying to you. None are your friends. None wish to help you. Wolves in sheep clothing. More distractions than ever before. The magician always makes a spectacle to hide the trick.
No Title Hmmmm…What do you think about this? pic.twitter.com/M87q3TLzv9
No Title JANET YELLEN MIGHT BE BACK. Anyone suggesting government took over the Fed and not the other way around needs to wake up. Fed gained more control. Even Bloomberg admits it. The revolving door and the control over the public is very evident to those paying attention. #janetyellen pic.twitter.com/2lHmrIHw0T
HOW TO MAKE MONEY ON AMAZON – FREE eCOURSE: http://TheAmazonGPS.com
LOOK THROUGH MY BOOKS! http://books.themoneygps.com
SUPPORT MY WORK: https://www.patreon.com/themoneygps
PAYPAL: https://goo.gl/L6VQg9
OTHER: http://themoneygps.com/donate
AUDIOBOOK: http://themoneygps.com/store
T-SHIRTS: http://merch.themoneygps.com
MY FAVORITE BOOKS: http://themoneygps.com/books
Sources Used in This Video: http://bit.ly/TheMoneyGPSSources2020
— PLAYLISTS —
The Money GPS – How To and Solutions
The Money GPS Easy eCourse
— The Money GPS —
How To Fix the Global Economy (Instagram)
No Title The Money GPS Financial Education 101 coming soon.100% free eCourse for you to learn from but for those who already know the content, this is perfect to share with others. I’m creating this course for people specifically to get the foundation #money #moneyGPS #financialeducation pic.twitter.com/nzqVVSSorT
The Money GPS is the most active, most informative channel in the financial world. Day after day, breaking down the data and making it easy to understand. This channel is not here to help build a portfolio, give stock picks, or financial advice. It’s simply data that is generally not found through conventional means.
#money #finance #invest
Twitter Instagram Facebook
# T h e M o n e y G P S
Read Later Add to Favourites Add to Collection Report


theduran--2020-12-03--Batches of militants returning to Syria after Azerbaijan refused to accept them

A new batch of the Turkish-backed factions arrived in northern Syria , coming from “ Azerbaijan ” , after refusing to settle them there after the end of the battles of “ Karabakh ” with Armenia .
Informed sources reported that the Turkish efforts to keep the Syrian militants in “ Azerbaijan ” under the pretext of their belonging to the Turkish nationalism , failed due to the Azerbaijani government ’ s refusal to settle the elements of Syrian Turkmen origin .
The sources indicated that about 900 militants have returned from Azerbaijan to Syria during the past few days @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the militants are expected to return during the next few days , after the need for them is no longer needed , following the signing of an agreement to stop fighting in “ Karabakh ” under Russian auspices .
Turkey had sent more than 2,500 militants from the pro-Syrian factions to support Azerbaijan in the Karabakh battles against Armenia , and the battles at that time resulted in the killing of about 300 armed factions , as the bodies of dozens of them are still in Azerbaijan .
It is returned to northern @ @ @ @ @ @ @ factions had previously returned to Syria from the “ Karabakh ” battles , after giving up all their dues in exchange for their return to the Syrian territories , while the rest of the militants were paid high salaries for participating in the fighting as mercenaries , similar to what Ankara did in Libya from sending members of the armed Syrian factions to it , to fight there within the ranks of the Turkish-backed “ government of reconciliation ” against the Libyan National Army .

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
A new batch of the Turkish-backed factions arrived in northern Syria, coming from “Azerbaijan”, after refusing to settle them there after the end of the battles of “Karabakh” with Armenia.
Informed sources reported that the Turkish efforts to keep the Syrian militants in “Azerbaijan” under the pretext of their belonging to the Turkish nationalism, failed due to the Azerbaijani government’s refusal to settle the elements of Syrian Turkmen origin.
The sources indicated that about 900 militants have returned from Azerbaijan to Syria during the past few days in batches, while the rest of the militants are expected to return during the next few days, after the need for them is no longer needed, following the signing of an agreement to stop fighting in “Karabakh” under Russian auspices.
Turkey had sent more than 2,500 militants from the pro-Syrian factions to support Azerbaijan in the Karabakh battles against Armenia, and the battles at that time resulted in the killing of about 300 armed factions, as the bodies of dozens of them are still in Azerbaijan. It is returned to northern Syria.
A number of the Turkish-backed factions had previously returned to Syria from the “Karabakh” battles, after giving up all their dues in exchange for their return to the Syrian territories, while the rest of the militants were paid high salaries for participating in the fighting as mercenaries, similar to what Ankara did in Libya from sending members of the armed Syrian factions to it, to fight there within the ranks of the Turkish-backed “government of reconciliation” against the Libyan National Army.
Read Later Add to Favourites Add to Collection Report


theduran--2020-12-03--American forces provide military training to the pro-“Maghawir al-Thawra” faction in SYRIA

American forces provide military training to the pro- “ Maghawir al-Thawra ” faction in the Badia The American forces stationed at the Al-Tanf base at the border triangle between Syria , Jordan and Iraq carried out military exercises with the Revolutionary Commandos faction loyal to it in the Syrian Badia .
A local source said that the US forces conducted two exercises with the platoon within one week , as they held the first round of training on November 24 , and the second on the 30th of the same month .
Vehicles equipped with machine guns attack training targets @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lessons to the faction members about first aid , while the spokesman for the International Coalition , Wayne Maruto , tweeted on Twitter , that the training aims to support the allies of the “ United States ” in Syria to fight against “ ISIS ” .
The Maghawir al-Thawra faction enjoys the support of the American forces stationed at the al-Tanf base , and plays a role in targeting the Syrian army forces within the Syrian Badia with American orders .
It besieges the al-Rukban camp near the al-Tanf base and prevents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ areas .
Controlled by the Syrian army , while the aforementioned faction has not previously carried out any prominent military action against “ ISIS .
”

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
American forces provide military training to the pro-“Maghawir al-Thawra” faction in the Badia
The American forces stationed at the Al-Tanf base at the border triangle between Syria, Jordan and Iraq carried out military exercises with the Revolutionary Commandos faction loyal to it in the Syrian Badia.
A local source said that the US forces conducted two exercises with the platoon within one week, as they held the first round of training on November 24, and the second on the 30th of the same month. Vehicles equipped with machine guns attack training targets.
Videos showed that American trainers provided lessons to the faction members about first aid, while the spokesman for the International Coalition, Wayne Maruto, tweeted on Twitter, that the training aims to support the allies of the “United States” in Syria to fight against “ISIS”.
The Maghawir al-Thawra faction enjoys the support of the American forces stationed at the al-Tanf base, and plays a role in targeting the Syrian army forces within the Syrian Badia with American orders. It besieges the al-Rukban camp near the al-Tanf base and prevents the people from returning to their original areas. Controlled by the Syrian army, while the aforementioned faction has not previously carried out any prominent military action against “ISIS.”
Read Later Add to Favourites Add to Collection Report