naturalhealth365--2020-06-16--5 ways to naturally eliminate psoriasis

5 ways to naturally eliminate psoriasis

( NaturalHealth365 ) If you are one of over 8 million Americans affected by psoriasis , you know that this chronic autoimmune skin condition can be frustrating , unsightly , uncomfortable and even quite painful .
Symptoms include reddened , thickened , scaly , and itchy skin , often with flaking , silvery patches ; joint pain may also be present .
Unfortunately , psoriasis is associated with a higher risk of health problems , including diabetes , depression , adverse cardiovascular events and metabolic syndrome .
But , today , we will focus on natural ways to resolve this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Can you tell me what causes psoriasis ?
Simply put : psoriasis occurs when the immune system mistakes normal skin cells for pathogens , and responds with an overgrowth of skin cells .
Psoriasis can develop anywhere on your body , although it is most common on hands and feet .
This inflammatory – non-contagious – illness is strongly linked to genetics ; experts say that if both parents have the condition , then their child will have a 50 percent chance of developing this condition .
A variety of factors can trigger @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such as insect bites , sunburns , or cuts – stress , a weakened immune system , and certain medications , including beta-blockers and lithium .
Conventionally speaking , there is no cure for psoriasis – which can go into remission and then flare up at unpredictable intervals .
Most doctors may prescribe a variety of medications to control symptoms , including steroids and salicylic acid .
However , these pharmaceutical drugs – in some cases – can be quite expensive and often cause negative side effects .
Keep in mind , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – so don ’ t stress your body with toxins .
Do your best to avoid pesticides in conventionally-grown food , GMOs , toxic vaccine ingredients , sugary processed foods and , course , environmental pollutants like dangerous household cleaners and personal care products .
Researchers have long known that low serum levels of vitamin D are associated with increased severity of psoriasis , so using vitamin D to treat it would seem to make good sense .
In fact , both new and established clinical studies bear this out .
A 2013 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ credits both topical and dietary vitamin D with being efficacious in the treatment of psoriasis , and recommends that the vitamin not be overlooked as a therapy .
The study authors pointed out that vitamin D , in addition to treating psoriasis , can also help protect against many of the adverse health effects associated with the condition .
In addition , vitamin D is inexpensive , easily obtainable and safe when used under the guidance of a knowledgeable medical professional .
Obviously , the best way to increase your vitamin D blood @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the sun – as often as possible .
The National Psoriasis Foundation ( NPF ) concurs , reporting that vitamin D is indeed beneficial in alleviating psoriasis , and may even prevent psoriatic lesions from forming .
Although topical vitamin D creams are available , the NPF notes you can also procure vitamin D from your diet by eating farm-fresh eggs and salmon .
But , with all the concerns about seafood contamination – the sun is looking like the best choice .
Colloidal oatmeal works at the molecular level to safely target @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Center , a daily bath in a tub of lukewarm water to which a cup of oatmeal has been added is a good way to dissolve psoriatic scales and soothe inflamed skin .
And this natural remedy is supported by strong scientific research .
In a 2010 review published in Journal of Drugs and Dermatology , the authors typified colloidal oatmeal as a natural product with an “ excellent safety and effectiveness record , ” and deemed it an ” important component of therapy for atopic dermatitis and psoriasis.
” Oatmeal ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ widely studied – are natural anti-inflammatory substances and antihistamines that inhibit the activity of nuclear factor kappa B cells and inflammatory cytokines .
Many dermatologists recommend following an oatmeal bath with a high-quality moisturizer .
Choosing a cream or ointment containing aloe vera extracts will allow you to land a one-two punch against psoriasis , as aloe vera gel could be the gold standard of herbal skin soothers .
The clear gel from the fleshy leaves of the aloe barbadensis plant is packed with polysaccharide glucomannan , which has a proven emollient effect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ natural plant sterols , beneficial vitamins , and bradykinase , a natural pain reliever and anti-inflammatory agent .
Magnesium lactate , which has an antihistamine and anti-itching effect , also contributes to the soothing effects .
Physician and natural health expert Ed Zimney , M.D.
, cites a 2009 randomized eight-week clinical study in which aloe vera worked better than triamcinolone acetate , a topical steroid , to alleviate psoriasis .
By the study ’ s end , patients in the aloe vera group had greater reductions in area and severity of psoriasis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If you are fortunate enough to have one of these attractive , dramatic-looking succulents as a houseplant or organically-grown garden ornamental , you can simply cut off a leaf , slit it down the middle and squeeze out the clear fluid .
To avoid stressing your aloe plant , only harvest leaves from mature , thriving specimens .
Fish oil , rich in omega-3 fatty acids , is endorsed by the Natural Institutes of Health as an effective therapy for reducing the pain and swelling of psoriasis .
And the University of Maryland @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the UMMC advises up to 3 grams of fish oil a day to reduce psoriatic inflammation .
However , because of possible PCB , dioxin and mercury contamination – which can cause cognitive impairments and nervous system dysfunction – check your fish oil supplement against the International Fish Oil Standards Program – which monitors toxin testing and accreditation of fish oil products .
Although the natural solutions above are all inexpensive , how about one that ’ s totally free , and obtainable merely by stepping outside ?
Julie Moore , M.D.
, @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recommends a half-hour “ sun bath ” as a natural way to treat psoriasis .
The key , of course , is the presence of beneficial ultraviolet rays in sunlight .
Sun exposure treatments should only be undertaken in consultation with your doctor , and exposure should be carefully timed .
Moore notes that sunburn can worsen psoriasis , and even trigger new outbreaks .
Naturally , you shouldn ’ t try to treat your psoriasis – or any other medical condition – with vitamin D , oatmeal , aloe vera , fish @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a trusted ( integrative ) physician .
A knowledgeable doctor can help you tailor a protocol that ’ s right for you .
If you feel you can ’ t communicate with your doctor about natural or alternative treatments for your psoriasis , find another doctor !
Never expose psoriatic skin to hot water or harsh soaps ; lukewarm baths and mild , gentle , fatty soaps are the ticket .
Avoid excessive alcohol use and exposure to cigarette smoke ; both of these can aggravate psoriasis .
If you smoke cigarettes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – as much as possible – exposure to environmental toxins , chemicals and pesticides .
Psoriasis can be a challenge to live with .
But these natural treatments can go a long way towards soothing discomfort , without resorting to potentially dangerous or expensive prescription medications .

(NaturalHealth365) If you are one of over 8 million Americans affected by psoriasis, you know that this chronic autoimmune skin condition can be frustrating, unsightly, uncomfortable and even quite painful. Symptoms include reddened, thickened, scaly, and itchy skin, often with flaking, silvery patches; joint pain may also be present.
Unfortunately, psoriasis is associated with a higher risk of health problems, including diabetes, depression, adverse cardiovascular events and metabolic syndrome. But, today, we will focus on natural ways to resolve this serious skin problem.
First step: Can you tell me what causes psoriasis?
Simply put: psoriasis occurs when the immune system mistakes normal skin cells for pathogens, and responds with an overgrowth of skin cells. Psoriasis can develop anywhere on your body, although it is most common on hands and feet.
This inflammatory – non-contagious – illness is strongly linked to genetics; experts say that if both parents have the condition, then their child will have a 50 percent chance of developing this condition. A variety of factors can trigger psoriasis, including infections, trauma – such as insect bites, sunburns, or cuts – stress, a weakened immune system, and certain medications, including beta-blockers and lithium.
Conventionally speaking, there is no cure for psoriasis – which can go into remission and then flare up at unpredictable intervals. Most doctors may prescribe a variety of medications to control symptoms, including steroids and salicylic acid. However, these pharmaceutical drugs – in some cases – can be quite expensive and often cause negative side effects.
Keep in mind, a weakened immune system is the main culprit – so don’t stress your body with toxins. Do your best to avoid pesticides in conventionally-grown food, GMOs, toxic vaccine ingredients, sugary processed foods and, course, environmental pollutants like dangerous household cleaners and personal care products.
Researchers strongly emphasize the importance of vitamin D
Researchers have long known that low serum levels of vitamin D are associated with increased severity of psoriasis, so using vitamin D to treat it would seem to make good sense. In fact, both new and established clinical studies bear this out.
A 2013 review published in Journal of Dermatological Treatment credits both topical and dietary vitamin D with being efficacious in the treatment of psoriasis, and recommends that the vitamin not be overlooked as a therapy.
The study authors pointed out that vitamin D, in addition to treating psoriasis, can also help protect against many of the adverse health effects associated with the condition. In addition, vitamin D is inexpensive, easily obtainable and safe when used under the guidance of a knowledgeable medical professional. Obviously, the best way to increase your vitamin D blood levels is to safely expose yourself to the sun – as often as possible.
The National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) concurs, reporting that vitamin D is indeed beneficial in alleviating psoriasis, and may even prevent psoriatic lesions from forming. Although topical vitamin D creams are available, the NPF notes you can also procure vitamin D from your diet by eating farm-fresh eggs and salmon.
But, with all the concerns about seafood contamination – the sun is looking like the best choice.
Colloidal oatmeal works at the molecular level to safely target psoriasis
According to University of Maryland Medical Center, a daily bath in a tub of lukewarm water to which a cup of oatmeal has been added is a good way to dissolve psoriatic scales and soothe inflamed skin. And this natural remedy is supported by strong scientific research.
In a 2010 review published in Journal of Drugs and Dermatology, the authors typified colloidal oatmeal as a natural product with an “excellent safety and effectiveness record,” and deemed it an” important component of therapy for atopic dermatitis and psoriasis.”
Oatmeal’s avenanthramides – active constituents that have been widely studied – are natural anti-inflammatory substances and antihistamines that inhibit the activity of nuclear factor kappa B cells and inflammatory cytokines.
Does aloe vera gel provide relief from psoriasis?
Many dermatologists recommend following an oatmeal bath with a high-quality moisturizer. Choosing a cream or ointment containing aloe vera extracts will allow you to land a one-two punch against psoriasis, as aloe vera gel could be the gold standard of herbal skin soothers.
The clear gel from the fleshy leaves of the aloe barbadensis plant is packed with polysaccharide glucomannan, which has a proven emollient effect. The gel is also rich in natural plant sterols, beneficial vitamins, and bradykinase, a natural pain reliever and anti-inflammatory agent. Magnesium lactate, which has an antihistamine and anti-itching effect, also contributes to the soothing effects.
Physician and natural health expert Ed Zimney, M.D., cites a 2009 randomized eight-week clinical study in which aloe vera worked better than triamcinolone acetate, a topical steroid, to alleviate psoriasis. By the study’s end, patients in the aloe vera group had greater reductions in area and severity of psoriasis than those in the steroid group.
If you are fortunate enough to have one of these attractive, dramatic-looking succulents as a houseplant or organically-grown garden ornamental, you can simply cut off a leaf, slit it down the middle and squeeze out the clear fluid. To avoid stressing your aloe plant, only harvest leaves from mature, thriving specimens.
The anti-inflammatory benefits of fish oil
Fish oil, rich in omega-3 fatty acids, is endorsed by the Natural Institutes of Health as an effective therapy for reducing the pain and swelling of psoriasis. And the University of Maryland Medical Center (UMMC) agrees; the UMMC advises up to 3 grams of fish oil a day to reduce psoriatic inflammation.
However, because of possible PCB, dioxin and mercury contamination – which can cause cognitive impairments and nervous system dysfunction – check your fish oil supplement against the International Fish Oil Standards Program – which monitors toxin testing and accreditation of fish oil products.
Is sunlight a natural cure for psoriasis?
Although the natural solutions above are all inexpensive, how about one that’s totally free, and obtainable merely by stepping outside?
Julie Moore, M.D., a dermatologist at Gottlieb Memorial Hospital, recommends a half-hour “sun bath” as a natural way to treat psoriasis. The key, of course, is the presence of beneficial ultraviolet rays in sunlight.
Sun exposure treatments should only be undertaken in consultation with your doctor, and exposure should be carefully timed. Moore notes that sunburn can worsen psoriasis, and even trigger new outbreaks.
Naturally, you shouldn’t try to treat your psoriasis – or any other medical condition – with vitamin D, oatmeal, aloe vera, fish oil or sun exposure without the guidance of a trusted (integrative) physician. A knowledgeable doctor can help you tailor a protocol that’s right for you.
If you feel you can’t communicate with your doctor about natural or alternative treatments for your psoriasis, find another doctor!
A final word about psoriasis therapy and prevention
Never expose psoriatic skin to hot water or harsh soaps; lukewarm baths and mild, gentle, fatty soaps are the ticket. Avoid excessive alcohol use and exposure to cigarette smoke; both of these can aggravate psoriasis.
If you smoke cigarettes, try to stop. And avoid – as much as possible – exposure to environmental toxins, chemicals and pesticides.
Psoriasis can be a challenge to live with. But these natural treatments can go a long way towards soothing discomfort, without resorting to potentially dangerous or expensive prescription medications.
Sources for this article include:
Psoriasis.org
Sciencedaily.com
NIH.gov
Mayoclinic.org
MNN.com
NIH.gov


naturalhealth365--2020-06-17--Bil Gates funded GM mosquitoes could be released this summer

( NaturalHealth365 ) Lately , many say the government is giving a lot of leeway to the biotech and medical industries , even though it ’ s yet to be seen whether such drastic steps actually benefit the public good .
One example would be the emergency use authorizations given to companies to allow for accelerated testing and manufacturing of COVID-19 treatments and vaccines .
Another example is … genetically modified mosquitoes ?
Grab your bug repellent .
Just last month , the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) granted an experimental use permit to a biotech company that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into the wild .
The company is backed by Bill Gates through his multi-billion dollar foundation .
U.S. EPA greenlights experimental release of genetically modified mosquitoes in the United States On May 1 , the EPA announced that they granted a special permit to a biotech company named Oxitec ( which receives funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ) .
With this permit in hand , Oxitec will be permitted to release genetically modified mosquitoes in Florida and Texas .
Oxitec and the EPA claim that the experimental release of these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to test whether they will “ protect public health from mosquito-borne illnesses.
” The EPA continues brazenly in their official statement that “ only male mosquitoes will be released into the environment and they do not bite people , ” so “ they will not pose a risk to people .
It is also anticipated that there would be no adverse effects to animals such as bats and fish in the environment.
” Allegedly , the male mosquitoes have been engineered with an abnormal protein that “ will inhibit the survival of their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ female mosquitoes.
” The experiment for the so-called “ Biopesticide Tool ” is slated to last two years .
Do NOT ignore the health dangers linked to toxic indoor air .
These chemicals - the 'off-gassing ' of paints , mattresses , carpets and other home/office building materials - increase your risk of headaches , dementia , heart disease and cancer .
Get the BEST indoor air purification system - at the LOWEST price , exclusively for NaturalHealth365 readers .
I , personally use this system in my home AND office .
Click @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sale ends .
3 natural ways to protect yourself from unwanted bug bites this summer Between the release of genetically engineered insects and the so-called “ murder hornets ” we heard about a few weeks ago , many people are left feeling like we ’ re in for an interesting summer .
But with the warm season upon us , many of us are preparing to spend more time outside , enjoy the weather , get that health-boosting vitamin D , and spend quality time with friends and family ( as much as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ much social distancing is being enforced ) .
Unfortunately , conventional bug repellents are loaded with chemicals of concern that have been linked to everything from skin irritation and blisters to seizures and neurtoxicity – and we ’ re not just talking about N , N-Diethyl-meta-toluamide ( DEET ) .
Other potentially toxic chemicals found in popular bug repellents ( which are actually classified as pesticides by the EPA ) include cyfluthrin , permethrin , and pyrethroids .
So , instead of spraying yourself and your children with these potentially harmful substances , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , including : • Clove oil : One 2013 study from the Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease determined that 0.1 mL of clove oil mixed in coconut oil protected against bug bites for a little more than 90 minutes .
• Citronella : The same 2013 study determined that 0.1 mL of citronella mixed in olive oil offered 165 minutes of protection .
This study was small and involved just one volunteer , but the results are promising and corroborate plenty of other studies supporting the use of essential oils for bug @ @ @ @ @ @ @ repel mosquitoes and other insects include peppermint oil , lemongrass oil , and lemon eucalyptus oil .
• Basil : Consider planting this herb around your house for fresh flavor and relief from pesky critters .
A 2011 review published in Malaria Journal cites several studies which support the use of basil as a moderately effective way to repel disease-carrying bugs .
For instance , Kenyan research has found that potted basil offers nearly 40 % protection against mosquitoes bearing malaria , while other lab data shows that essential oil of basil applied @ @ @ @ @ @ @ protection against mosquitoes carrying yellow fever .
Be mindful that just because a product is marketed as “ natural or plant-based ” doesn ’ t always necessarily mean it ’ s safe or effective for you .
This is especially true for something like pure essential oils , which often need to be diluted with a carrier oil prior to putting on the skin .
So , pay attention to how your skin and body reacts to the product you choose .

(NaturalHealth365) Lately, many say the government is giving a lot of leeway to the biotech and medical industries, even though it’s yet to be seen whether such drastic steps actually benefit the public good. One example would be the emergency use authorizations given to companies to allow for accelerated testing and manufacturing of COVID-19 treatments and vaccines. Another example is … genetically modified mosquitoes?
Grab your bug repellent. Just last month, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) granted an experimental use permit to a biotech company that will allow them to release lab-made bugs into the wild. The company is backed by Bill Gates through his multi-billion dollar foundation.
U.S. EPA greenlights experimental release of genetically modified mosquitoes in the United States
On May 1, the EPA announced that they granted a special permit to a biotech company named Oxitec (which receives funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation). With this permit in hand, Oxitec will be permitted to release genetically modified mosquitoes in Florida and Texas.
Oxitec and the EPA claim that the experimental release of these genetically engineered Aedes aegypti mosquitoes is intended to test whether they will “protect public health from mosquito-borne illnesses.” The EPA continues brazenly in their official statement that “only male mosquitoes will be released into the environment and they do not bite people,” so “they will not pose a risk to people. It is also anticipated that there would be no adverse effects to animals such as bats and fish in the environment.”
Allegedly, the male mosquitoes have been engineered with an abnormal protein that “will inhibit the survival of their female offspring when they mate with wild female mosquitoes.”
The experiment for the so-called “Biopesticide Tool” is slated to last two years.
3 natural ways to protect yourself from unwanted bug bites this summer
Between the release of genetically engineered insects and the so-called “murder hornets” we heard about a few weeks ago, many people are left feeling like we’re in for an interesting summer. But with the warm season upon us, many of us are preparing to spend more time outside, enjoy the weather, get that health-boosting vitamin D, and spend quality time with friends and family (as much as possible, anyway, depending on how much social distancing is being enforced).
Unfortunately, conventional bug repellents are loaded with chemicals of concern that have been linked to everything from skin irritation and blisters to seizures and neurtoxicity – and we’re not just talking about N,N-Diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET). Other potentially toxic chemicals found in popular bug repellents (which are actually classified as pesticides by the EPA) include cyfluthrin, permethrin, and pyrethroids.
So, instead of spraying yourself and your children with these potentially harmful substances, consider alternative, more holistic options instead, including:
Clove oil: One 2013 study from the Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease determined that 0.1 mL of clove oil mixed in coconut oil protected against bug bites for a little more than 90 minutes. Citronella: The same 2013 study determined that 0.1 mL of citronella mixed in olive oil offered 165 minutes of protection. This study was small and involved just one volunteer, but the results are promising and corroborate plenty of other studies supporting the use of essential oils for bug repelling. Other essential oils that may repel mosquitoes and other insects include peppermint oil, lemongrass oil, and lemon eucalyptus oil. Basil: Consider planting this herb around your house for fresh flavor and relief from pesky critters. A 2011 review published in Malaria Journal cites several studies which support the use of basil as a moderately effective way to repel disease-carrying bugs. For instance, Kenyan research has found that potted basil offers nearly 40% protection against mosquitoes bearing malaria, while other lab data shows that essential oil of basil applied topically provides as much as 100% protection against mosquitoes carrying yellow fever.
Be mindful that just because a product is marketed as “natural or plant-based” doesn’t always necessarily mean it’s safe or effective for you. This is especially true for something like pure essential oils, which often need to be diluted with a carrier oil prior to putting on the skin.
So, pay attention to how your skin and body reacts to the product you choose.
Sources for this article include:
Activistpost.com
Theconversation.com
Medicalnewstoday.com
Madesafe.org
Madesafe.org
Sciencedirect.com
FDA.gov
Biomedcentral.com
Govdelivery.com
Regulations.gov


naturalhealth365--2020-06-18--Whistleblower nurse exposes the hidden medical horror of COVID-19 “protocols”

( NaturalHealth365 ) Erin Marie Olszewski is a Floridian nurse who served for our country in Iraq .
She served our country again , this time , on the frontline of the COVID-19 crisis in New York during the mass “ outbreak ” through April and May .
After witnessing the atrocities of the government health system and how the virus was handled in public hospitals – she exposes what actually happened in New York .
In the investigative videos , she donned a hidden camera , shared concrete proof that non-COVID patients were forced alongside COVID positive patients , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ testing for certain socio-economic groups .
Olszewski has become the voice of all the nurses who are too afraid to share the disturbing truth publicly .
Watch her incredible story in this revealing video below : The disproportionate spread of infection in New York : What happened in Elmhurst hospital ?
An important question – to say the least : Why was the spike of cases in deaths and cases so extortionate in New York ?
In particular , why was Elmhurst Hospital such a horrible situation ?
Olszewski reveals what happened behind @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Elmhurst , where many patients were on government programs like Medicaid , the spread of the virus was carelessly managed .
Firstly , patients were not correctly diagnosed and separated .
Olszewski shows us her patient records that clearly state her patients – who had been tested and labels “ COVID undetected ” were still treated as a COVID-19 patient .
This meant that COVID and non-COVID patients were mixed during the height of the virus , no doubt facilitating the spread and accounting for countless innocent lives lost .
In addition to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government never provided rapid testing for vulnerable hospitals .
Although 45-minute rapid testing technology was available in America , they used standard testing instead .
This resulted in potentially non-COVID-19 affected people mixing with COVID-19 infected patients for 5 to 10 days while they were waiting for their results .
In many cases , these patients were COVID-19 positive the second time around for obvious reasons .
When Olszewski questioned a doctor about this , he said , “ If you have deep pockets , you get it first.
” Olszewski says , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact that they ’ ll get it because they ’ re immunocompromised … they don ’ t care.
” This intermingling of patients contributed to patients with other medical issues such as stroke contracting COVID-19 during their hospitalization .
Over-whelmed with patients , student residents , and even dentists , were responsible for the lives of many on the ICU floors with no actual ICU experience .
The residents were practicing their newly learned skills on the patients in this hospital , and “ no one was held accountable for anything , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ With hospitals gaining financial incentives for more cases of COVID-19 patients , could this intermingling and irresponsible testing have placed finances above human life ?
It certainly appears to be the only logical explanation for this carelessness .
Nurses and doctors arguing , and the inhumane orders from “ higher-up ” Olszewski describes an event she was particularly traumatized by .
Under normal circumstances , a nurse doesn ’ t act upon a DNR ( do not resuscitate ) order unless the family has advised a physician .
In these cases , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and the assisting medical teams will not resuscitate if a patient becomes unconscious .
As we can hear in the banned recordings , doctors sheepishly explain the “ new COVID policies.
” They now had the authority to place a DNR on a patient without family consent only weeks into the pandemics ’ inception .
Olszewski questions , “ Are you guys really trying to kill everybody like everyone thinks ?
” Many nurses fought back at these new inhumane ruling .
They exclaimed although there may be higher orders , their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fail to resuscitate a patient with a DNR not sourced from the family ’ s instruction .
In one instance , three nurses argued with a smirking doctor over a patients ’ dying body over these controversial new COVID policies .
The 37-year-old patient died !
Extremely emotional after this futile medical care , Olszewski shared her opinion with the doctor .
The inexperienced doctors shrugged the comments off , explaining that they ’ re just following orders , and anything that they do comes from “ the top.
” The same people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that could have saved lives .
Countless innocent lives could have been spared during this COVID-19 crisis It ’ s clear that during the midst of this crisis , not all human lives were created equally .
The patients at Elmhurst were disproportionately minority populations , and this hospital was one of the places that accepted those on Medicaid .
Elmhurst became the epicenter of this newly revealed COVID-19 pandemic .
Now the careless attitude of the unnamed orders from “ the top ” leading to the deaths of many is exposed .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ were working in other states such as zinc and hydroxychloroquine ingestion were banned .
Instead , they baselessly ordered more and more ventilators that were not solving the rapidly steepening death trajectory .
Currently , as of June 16 , 2020 , the New York death toll sits at over 17,000 “ confirmed COVID19 deaths , ” with nearly 118,000 deaths America-wide .
COVID-19 model projections estimate the toll will rise to 200,000 by October .
We need those unnamed “ higher-ups ” to value all human life , not just the financially @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for hospitals like Elmhurst , the change of these new “ DNR policies , ” and competent separation of COVID and non-COVID patients .
With a “ second-wave ” on the horizon , the U.S. healthcare system needs to do a much better job at protecting the families who need it the most .

(NaturalHealth365) Erin Marie Olszewski is a Floridian nurse who served for our country in Iraq. She served our country again, this time, on the frontline of the COVID-19 crisis in New York during the mass “outbreak” through April and May. After witnessing the atrocities of the government health system and how the virus was handled in public hospitals – she exposes what actually happened in New York.
In the investigative videos, she donned a hidden camera, shared concrete proof that non-COVID patients were forced alongside COVID positive patients, and a lack of access to vital testing for certain socio-economic groups. Olszewski has become the voice of all the nurses who are too afraid to share the disturbing truth publicly.
Watch her incredible story in this revealing video below:
The disproportionate spread of infection in New York: What happened in Elmhurst hospital?
An important question – to say the least: Why was the spike of cases in deaths and cases so extortionate in New York? In particular, why was Elmhurst Hospital such a horrible situation?
Olszewski reveals what happened behind closed hospital doors. In hospitals like Elmhurst, where many patients were on government programs like Medicaid, the spread of the virus was carelessly managed.
Firstly, patients were not correctly diagnosed and separated. Olszewski shows us her patient records that clearly state her patients – who had been tested and labels “COVID undetected” were still treated as a COVID-19 patient. This meant that COVID and non-COVID patients were mixed during the height of the virus, no doubt facilitating the spread and accounting for countless innocent lives lost.
A major problem with testing procedures
In addition to this irresponsible mixing of patients, the government never provided rapid testing for vulnerable hospitals. Although 45-minute rapid testing technology was available in America, they used standard testing instead.
This resulted in potentially non-COVID-19 affected people mixing with COVID-19 infected patients for 5 to 10 days while they were waiting for their results. In many cases, these patients were COVID-19 positive the second time around for obvious reasons. When Olszewski questioned a doctor about this, he said, “If you have deep pockets, you get it first.”
Olszewski says, “they’re banking on the fact that they’ll get it because they’re immunocompromised … they don’t care.” This intermingling of patients contributed to patients with other medical issues such as stroke contracting COVID-19 during their hospitalization.
Over-whelmed with patients, student residents, and even dentists, were responsible for the lives of many on the ICU floors with no actual ICU experience. The residents were practicing their newly learned skills on the patients in this hospital, and “no one was held accountable for anything,” according to the military veteran nurse.
With hospitals gaining financial incentives for more cases of COVID-19 patients, could this intermingling and irresponsible testing have placed finances above human life? It certainly appears to be the only logical explanation for this carelessness.
Nurses and doctors arguing, and the inhumane orders from “higher-up”
Olszewski describes an event she was particularly traumatized by. Under normal circumstances, a nurse doesn’t act upon a DNR (do not resuscitate) order unless the family has advised a physician. In these cases, a DNR will be placed on their file, and the assisting medical teams will not resuscitate if a patient becomes unconscious.
As we can hear in the banned recordings, doctors sheepishly explain the “new COVID policies.” They now had the authority to place a DNR on a patient without family consent only weeks into the pandemics’ inception.
Olszewski questions, “Are you guys really trying to kill everybody like everyone thinks?” Many nurses fought back at these new inhumane ruling. They exclaimed although there may be higher orders, their nursing licenses do not allow them to fail to resuscitate a patient with a DNR not sourced from the family’s instruction.
In one instance, three nurses argued with a smirking doctor over a patients’ dying body over these controversial new COVID policies. The 37-year-old patient died!
Extremely emotional after this futile medical care, Olszewski shared her opinion with the doctor. The inexperienced doctors shrugged the comments off, explaining that they’re just following orders, and anything that they do comes from “the top.”
The same people in charge of providing proper testing kits that could have saved lives.
Countless innocent lives could have been spared during this COVID-19 crisis
It’s clear that during the midst of this crisis, not all human lives were created equally. The patients at Elmhurst were disproportionately minority populations, and this hospital was one of the places that accepted those on Medicaid.
Elmhurst became the epicenter of this newly revealed COVID-19 pandemic. Now the careless attitude of the unnamed orders from “the top” leading to the deaths of many is exposed.
Furthermore, “alternative” therapies that were working in other states such as zinc and hydroxychloroquine ingestion were banned. Instead, they baselessly ordered more and more ventilators that were not solving the rapidly steepening death trajectory.
Currently, as of June 16, 2020, the New York death toll sits at over 17,000 “confirmed COVID19 deaths,” with nearly 118,000 deaths America-wide. COVID-19 model projections estimate the toll will rise to 200,000 by October.
We need those unnamed “higher-ups” to value all human life, not just the financially advantaged. This includes providing rapid testing for hospitals like Elmhurst, the change of these new “DNR policies,” and competent separation of COVID and non-COVID patients.
With a “second-wave” on the horizon, the U.S. healthcare system needs to do a much better job at protecting the families who need it the most.
Sources for this article include:
CNN.com
Covid19.healthdata.org


naturalhealth365--2020-06-17--Bill Gates funded GM mosquitoes could be released this summer


naturalhealth365--2020-06-19--Big pharma EXPOSED by leaked conversation between Lancet and NEJM Editors-in-Chief

( NaturalHealth365 ) A leaked top-secret conversation between the editors of two of the world ’ s leading medical journals is sending shock waves throughout the natural health community .
The stunning conversation appears to reveal the role of scientists as mere puppets in a corrupt shadow play engineered by Big Pharma -and contains allusions to Big Pharma ’ s efforts to rig studies to discredit certain drugs ( in this case , hydroxychloroquine ) in order to eventually market more expensive medications .
The scandal began when both The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine published an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ drug hydroxychloroquine is of no medical benefit in treating COVID-19 – and may even be dangerous .
But the leaked conversation – along with a “ sketchy ” connection to a suspect database – is casting doubt on the study ’ s credibility ( to put it mildly ! )
The BIG question : Does this leaked conversation reveal hydroxychloroquine was “ trashed ” for the sake of vaccine profits down the road ?
For many , the use of hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) to prevent or treat COVID-19 remains controversial .
While @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has famously taken it himself – the head of his COVID-19 task force , Anthony Fauci , MD , expresses skepticism about its efficacy .
In an influential study published in The Lancet on May 22 , 2020 , the authors claimed to have analyzed data from nearly 96,000 COVID-19 patients in 671 different hospitals , who received either HCQ by itself or in conjunction with other medications .
The authors concluded that they were unable to confirm any therapeutic benefit of HCQ .
In fact , they reported that it led to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ frequency of ventricular arrhythmias .
The article was eventually published by the NEJM as well .
This conclusion , which made headline news around the world , led to the World Health Organization ( WHO ) cancelling its clinical HCQ trials .
It was seized upon by many media pundits , who turned it into a “ political football ” and used it to roundly mock supporters of HCQ .
Doesn ’ t it sound as though HCQ has been thoroughly discredited ?
Not so fast !
Guardian investigation exposes glaring errors – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ junk science , ” and outright quackery Within a week , problems with the credibility of the review came to light .
And these were so serious that some have dubbed the entire affair “ LancetGate.
” For one thing , Surgisphere – the company which provided the data for the study – was founded by Dr. Sapan S. Desai , who just happens to be one of the article ’ s co-authors .
In an investigation conducted by British publication The Guardian , more damning revelations emerged .
According to reports @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hospitals ( which supposedly participated in the study ) .
All denied any knowledge of Surgisphere and disavowed any role in a database .
Other “ red flags ” popped up , as well .
Surgisphere claims to obtain its data from a massive health-care data analytics platform , and to function as one of the largest and fastest hospital databases in the entire world .
Yet the company currently lists a mere three employees , appears to have little online presence and maintains a very minimal footprint on social media platforms .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ one “ science editor ” at Surgisphere is reputedly a science fiction author and fantasy artist , while a marketing executive appears to moonlight as an adult content model and events hostess !
The point is not to ridicule these individuals ’ career choices – but these professions don ’ t exactly broadcast scientific or statistical credibility … do they ?
It ’ s no wonder that many believe that Surgisphere is nothing more than a lucrative front that invents data to be used by Big Pharma to discredit inexpensive off-patent drugs in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines .
Important update : the study has now been officially retracted by The Lancet , which cited questions about the “ veracity of the data.
” Independent peer reviewers reportedly found that Surgisphere , citing confidentiality concerns , refused to transfer the full data set for analysis .
Whoops !
Leaked conversation establishes that editors are aware that journals are shilling for corrupt Big Pharma Now , a leaked conversation between the editors of the two journals has shown that they are fully aware that the data may be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ editor of the New England Journal of Medicine , Richard Horton , the Editor-in-Chief of The Lancet , allegedly made the following statement .
“ We are not going to be able to … publish any more clinical research data because the pharmaceutical companies are so financially powerful today … as to have us accept papers which are apparently methodologically perfect but which in reality manage to conclude what they want them to conclude.
” “ So financially powerful , ” and “ manage to conclude what they want them to conclude… ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The conversation was revealed by Phillipe Douste-Blazy , M.D.
, a renowned cardiologist and researcher — who also happens to be the former Health Minister of France .
Click this link for video of the bombshell interview with Dr. Douste-Blazy .
The shameful legacy of “ LancetGate ” may include ( preventable ) loss of life Natural health advocates point out that smearing hydroxychloroquine as ineffective against COVID-19 leaves the field open for Big Pharma to ride to the rescue with its vaccine – incidentally , reaping hundreds of billions of dollars in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of lives .
The truth is : both The Lancet and the NEJM are largely funded by the pharmaceutical giants .
With a massive pocketbook for funding , Big Pharma can easily purchase fabricated data , stifle and censor criticism and maintain their virtual monopoly on science , media and advertising messaging .
Dr. Douste-Blazy , at the center of the controversy , has a scathing observation on the scandal .
While most doctors look at the COVID-19 outbreak and see “ suffering , ” the physician commented , other individuals see “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ surely one of the most outrageous scientific frauds ever perpetrated .

(NaturalHealth365) A leaked top-secret conversation between the editors of two of the world’s leading medical journals is sending shock waves throughout the natural health community. The stunning conversation appears to reveal the role of scientists as mere puppets in a corrupt shadow play engineered by Big Pharma -and contains allusions to Big Pharma’s efforts to rig studies to discredit certain drugs (in this case, hydroxychloroquine) in order to eventually market more expensive medications.
The scandal began when both The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine published an article seeming to show that the off-patent drug hydroxychloroquine is of no medical benefit in treating COVID-19 – and may even be dangerous. But the leaked conversation – along with a “sketchy” connection to a suspect database – is casting doubt on the study’s credibility (to put it mildly!)
The BIG question: Does this leaked conversation reveal hydroxychloroquine was “trashed” for the sake of vaccine profits down the road?
For many, the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) to prevent or treat COVID-19 remains controversial. While President Trump swears by it – and has famously taken it himself – the head of his COVID-19 task force, Anthony Fauci, MD, expresses skepticism about its efficacy.
In an influential study published in The Lancet on May 22, 2020, the authors claimed to have analyzed data from nearly 96,000 COVID-19 patients in 671 different hospitals, who received either HCQ by itself or in conjunction with other medications.
The authors concluded that they were unable to confirm any therapeutic benefit of HCQ. In fact, they reported that it led to decreased in-hospital survival, while increasing the frequency of ventricular arrhythmias.
The article was eventually published by the NEJM as well.
This conclusion, which made headline news around the world, led to the World Health Organization (WHO) cancelling its clinical HCQ trials. It was seized upon by many media pundits, who turned it into a “political football” and used it to roundly mock supporters of HCQ.
Doesn’t it sound as though HCQ has been thoroughly discredited? Not so fast!
Guardian investigation exposes glaring errors – leading to accusations of fabricated data, “junk science,” and outright quackery
Within a week, problems with the credibility of the review came to light. And these were so serious that some have dubbed the entire affair “LancetGate.”
For one thing, Surgisphere – the company which provided the data for the study – was founded by Dr. Sapan S. Desai, who just happens to be one of the article’s co-authors.
In an investigation conducted by British publication The Guardian, more damning revelations emerged.
According to reports, The Guardian contacted seven different Australian hospitals (which supposedly participated in the study). All denied any knowledge of Surgisphere and disavowed any role in a database.
Other “red flags” popped up, as well.
Surgisphere claims to obtain its data from a massive health-care data analytics platform, and to function as one of the largest and fastest hospital databases in the entire world. Yet the company currently lists a mere three employees, appears to have little online presence and maintains a very minimal footprint on social media platforms.
Even more troubling: reports suggest that one “science editor” at Surgisphere is reputedly a science fiction author and fantasy artist, while a marketing executive appears to moonlight as an adult content model and events hostess!
The point is not to ridicule these individuals’ career choices – but these professions don’t exactly broadcast scientific or statistical credibility … do they?
It’s no wonder that many believe that Surgisphere is nothing more than a lucrative front that invents data to be used by Big Pharma to discredit inexpensive off-patent drugs in order put the media spotlight on high-profit pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines.
Important update: the study has now been officially retracted by The Lancet, which cited questions about the “veracity of the data.” Independent peer reviewers reportedly found that Surgisphere, citing confidentiality concerns, refused to transfer the full data set for analysis.
Whoops! Leaked conversation establishes that editors are aware that journals are shilling for corrupt Big Pharma
Now, a leaked conversation between the editors of the two journals has shown that they are fully aware that the data may be faked. In a conversation with the editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, Richard Horton, the Editor-in-Chief of The Lancet, allegedly made the following statement.
“We are not going to be able to … publish any more clinical research data because the pharmaceutical companies are so financially powerful today … as to have us accept papers which are apparently methodologically perfect but which in reality manage to conclude what they want them to conclude.”
“So financially powerful,” and “manage to conclude what they want them to conclude…”
Let that sink in a moment.
The conversation was revealed by Phillipe Douste-Blazy, M.D., a renowned cardiologist and researcher — who also happens to be the former Health Minister of France. Click this link for video of the bombshell interview with Dr. Douste-Blazy.
The shameful legacy of “LancetGate” may include (preventable) loss of life
Natural health advocates point out that smearing hydroxychloroquine as ineffective against COVID-19 leaves the field open for Big Pharma to ride to the rescue with its vaccine – incidentally, reaping hundreds of billions of dollars in profits while potentially costing hundreds of thousands of lives.
The truth is: both The Lancet and the NEJM are largely funded by the pharmaceutical giants. With a massive pocketbook for funding, Big Pharma can easily purchase fabricated data, stifle and censor criticism and maintain their virtual monopoly on science, media and advertising messaging.
Dr. Douste-Blazy, at the center of the controversy, has a scathing observation on the scandal. While most doctors look at the COVID-19 outbreak and see “suffering,” the physician commented, other individuals see “dollars.”
If true, LancetGate is surely one of the most outrageous scientific frauds ever perpetrated.
Sources for this article include:
TheLancet.com
Medicine.news


naturalhealth365--2020-06-20--New COVID-19 vaccine from aborted babies, begins testing

( NaturalHealth365 ) Nations around the world are attempting to become the first to mass-produce a “ safe ” vaccine within the next year .
What ’ s next ?
Rushed research and a vaccine from aborted babies ?
Apparently so .
We know that vaccines generally need 5 to 15 years to develop safely , but most countries are attempting the marathon task of vaccine trials at a sprinters pace .
Now , the Canadian government has partnered with China to undertake questionable research on a new vaccine .
The research involves the cell lines of aborted babies .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ breaking research ” was discovered , the Canadian government sources fail to inform their citizens that their advances are thanks to the cell lines of unborn babies .
The COVID-19 vaccine trials from aborted baby cells : What you need to know The National Research Council ’ s ( NAC ) press release states that the vaccine Ad5-nCoV received Chinese regulatory approval earlier this year .
One of the few candidates given the go-ahead for human clinical trials .
The HEK293 cell line is from aborted baby cells , almost a decade @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the experiments for Ebola vaccinations .
The Canadian government claim that they are “ pav ( ing ) the way for future clinical trials in Canada.
” Yet they fail to mention the unethical nature of their research methods .
To source this essential information , an expert Alan Moy M.D .
was sought out , stating , “ Since it ’ s using an adenovirus replication-defective vector , it is using HEK293 .
HEK293 is an aborted fetal cell line , ” While the public is told their government is paving the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they remain uninformed that their vaccine is from aborted baby cell lines .
The NRC remains committed to this unethical partnership with taxpayers hard-earned money If you ’ re in the USA , your taxes aren ’ t being spent on this research yet as far as we know .
But a whopping $ 1 Million of our Canadian neighbors ’ hard-earned money is being invested in this controversial project .
A further $ 44 Million is to be spent in Montreal on upgrade to support compliance with vaccination manufacturing standards .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ process of signing the paperwork to partner with the Chinese firm CanSino Biogolies Inc .
This paperwork with authorizing the testing of human trials on this controversial vaccine .
Most Canadians remain uninformed with the president of their National Research Council of Canada , stating , “ ( the ) vaccine candidate holds great promise.
” No doubt , a statement to instill hope in their citizens after isolating lockdown periods .
With $ 45 Million on the line , there ’ s no telling if this vaccine from aborted babies will even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ strain of Ad5 is usually ineffective in humans due to high immunity levels .
Whether you ’ re pro-life or pro-choice , $ 45 million of hard-earned taxpayer money is a gamble most would be unwilling to make .
Aside from ethics , there are significant problems associated with a vaccine from aborted babies The “ race ” for a vaccine is becoming increasingly desperate .
Abortion itself is still a heavily debated topic , let alone using the embryonic cells in an attempt to be the first to mass-produce a rushed vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ issues with using aborted fetal lines in vaccines .
The DNA within them can be potentially tumorigenic to humans .
A new study out of Italy analyzed the validity and effects of conducting scientific research on aborted cell lines .
The results were shocking !
They found that the DNA represented was a complete human genome by the time the child was aborted , and there are some definite genetic abnormalities .
The genome had many inconsistencies with healthy humans , including 560 genes associated with cancer .
There were many variations , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ DNA – many linked to the genes that induce cancer .
Although the link between the use of fetal cell line vaccines and the onset of cancer is not a widely researched topic yet , we can not ignore this extensive evidence .
We already know the dangers of injecting unknown strains into our bodies in the name of science .
With Dr. Anthony Fauci making statements eluding to mandatory vaccines being forced upon all Americans , it ’ s crucial that governments stop covering up how they ’ re developing their latest @ @

(NaturalHealth365) Nations around the world are attempting to become the first to mass-produce a “safe” vaccine within the next year. What’s next? Rushed research and a vaccine from aborted babies? Apparently so.
We know that vaccines generally need 5 to 15 years to develop safely, but most countries are attempting the marathon task of vaccine trials at a sprinters pace. Now, the Canadian government has partnered with China to undertake questionable research on a new vaccine.
The research involves the cell lines of aborted babies. Although the studies clearly state how the “breaking research” was discovered, the Canadian government sources fail to inform their citizens that their advances are thanks to the cell lines of unborn babies.
The COVID-19 vaccine trials from aborted baby cells: What you need to know
The National Research Council’s (NAC) press release states that the vaccine Ad5-nCoV received Chinese regulatory approval earlier this year. One of the few candidates given the go-ahead for human clinical trials.
The HEK293 cell line is from aborted baby cells, almost a decade old, that was also used in the experiments for Ebola vaccinations. The Canadian government claim that they are “pav(ing) the way for future clinical trials in Canada.” Yet they fail to mention the unethical nature of their research methods.
To source this essential information, an expert Alan Moy M.D. was sought out, stating, “Since it’s using an adenovirus replication-defective vector, it is using HEK293. HEK293 is an aborted fetal cell line,” While the public is told their government is paving the way for the most advanced research, they remain uninformed that their vaccine is from aborted baby cell lines.
The NRC remains committed to this unethical partnership with taxpayers hard-earned money
If you’re in the USA, your taxes aren’t being spent on this research yet as far as we know. But a whopping $1 Million of our Canadian neighbors’ hard-earned money is being invested in this controversial project.
A further $44 Million is to be spent in Montreal on upgrade to support compliance with vaccination manufacturing standards.
The Canadian national research group are in the process of signing the paperwork to partner with the Chinese firm CanSino Biogolies Inc. This paperwork with authorizing the testing of human trials on this controversial vaccine.
Most Canadians remain uninformed with the president of their National Research Council of Canada, stating, “(the) vaccine candidate holds great promise.” No doubt, a statement to instill hope in their citizens after isolating lockdown periods.
With $45 Million on the line, there’s no telling if this vaccine from aborted babies will even work. Dr. Moy stated that the strain of Ad5 is usually ineffective in humans due to high immunity levels. Whether you’re pro-life or pro-choice, $45 million of hard-earned taxpayer money is a gamble most would be unwilling to make.
Aside from ethics, there are significant problems associated with a vaccine from aborted babies
The “race” for a vaccine is becoming increasingly desperate. Abortion itself is still a heavily debated topic, let alone using the embryonic cells in an attempt to be the first to mass-produce a rushed vaccine. Furthermore, 2019 data reveals the issues with using aborted fetal lines in vaccines.
The DNA within them can be potentially tumorigenic to humans.
A new study out of Italy analyzed the validity and effects of conducting scientific research on aborted cell lines. The results were shocking!
They found that the DNA represented was a complete human genome by the time the child was aborted, and there are some definite genetic abnormalities. The genome had many inconsistencies with healthy humans, including 560 genes associated with cancer.
There were many variations, copies, and structural variants to the DNA – many linked to the genes that induce cancer.
Although the link between the use of fetal cell line vaccines and the onset of cancer is not a widely researched topic yet, we cannot ignore this extensive evidence. We already know the dangers of injecting unknown strains into our bodies in the name of science.
With Dr. Anthony Fauci making statements eluding to mandatory vaccines being forced upon all Americans, it’s crucial that governments stop covering up how they’re developing their latest vaccines.
Sources for this article include:
Childrenshealthdefense.org
Lifesitenews.org
Canada.ca
NIH.gov


naturalhealth365--2020-06-21--Beware: Factory farms are ground zero for future pandemics

( NaturalHealth365 ) Industrialized factory farms produce about 99 percent of America ’ s meat .
But , these centralized food production facilities present many modern day health problems … as you ’ ll soon see .
For example , at these farms animals by the thousands are cramped together snout to snout or beak to beak in football-field sized sheds .
There ’ s little fresh air and sunlight .
The conditions are unsanitary , assembly-line like , and the ammonia from decomposing waste burns the animals ’ lungs , further stressing their already crippled immune systems .
Combine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ farms are ground zero environments for future pandemics .
Livestock health is the weakest link in the global health chain For decades , the World Health Organization and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) have been warning that industrialized farming practices increase the risk of emerging infectious diseases .
The truth is : influenza and coronaviruses can move fluidly between animal and human populations , and no quarantine or lockdown can change that .
Recent pandemic and virus threats such as H1N1 ( swine flu ) and H5N1 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and pig factory farms .
H1N1 originated in the late 1990s on factory farms in North Carolina , before mutating and popping up again on factory farms in Mexico , and eventually leading to the 2009 H1N1 flu pandemic .
In its first year of circulation , in 2009 , the H1N1 flu killed between 151,700-575,400 people worldwide .
While the full history of the emergence of COVID-19 remains unknown , there ’ s no ambiguity when it comes to the fact that industrialized factory farms are breeding grounds for viruses and future @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dangers linked to toxic indoor air .
These chemicals - the 'off-gassing ' of paints , mattresses , carpets and other home/office building materials - increase your risk of headaches , dementia , heart disease and cancer .
Get the BEST indoor air purification system - at the LOWEST price , exclusively for NaturalHealth365 readers .
I , personally use this system in my home AND office .
Click HERE to order now - before the sale ends .
Factory farms are as dangerous as “ wet markets ” While it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ markets , ” the next zoonotic pandemic could easily arise from factory farms .
In fact , the unscrupulous corporations that promote factory farming seem to understand just how dangerous the farming conditions are , as antibiotics are routinely used on animals at factory farms to prevent the spread of disease .
Roughly 70 percent of the “ medically important ” antibiotics in the U.S. are sold for animal agriculture .
To make matters worse the overuse of antibiotics have led to widespread antibiotic resistance and superbugs , making once curable infections and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which fuels a perfect storm of pandemic possibility .
Commercial chicken farms have proven particularly dangerous .
It ’ s on factory chicken farms that scientists have most frequently found viruses that have mutated from a form found only in animals to a form that ’ s harmful to humans .
Acknowledge the link between animal and human health No doubt , corporate agriculture is a broken system that puts us at risk of future pandemics .
History and research have shown that zoonotic viruses can easily spill over to humans from animals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for that spillover .
The big question : what can we do ?
We can go organic , support local , family farms , or simply avoid animal products altogether .
Bottom line : we can eat differently ( while improving our health ) and still enjoy our food .
In addition , we can support advocacy organizations that oppose factory farming .
Most importantly , we can be aware of the dangers of industrial factory farming , and then do our part to contribute to the change we want to see in @ @ @

(NaturalHealth365) Industrialized factory farms produce about 99 percent of America’s meat. But, these centralized food production facilities present many modern day health problems … as you’ll soon see.
For example, at these farms animals by the thousands are cramped together snout to snout or beak to beak in football-field sized sheds. There’s little fresh air and sunlight.
The conditions are unsanitary, assembly-line like, and the ammonia from decomposing waste burns the animals’ lungs, further stressing their already crippled immune systems. Combine all of these factors and industrialized factory farms are ground zero environments for future pandemics.
Livestock health is the weakest link in the global health chain
For decades, the World Health Organization and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have been warning that industrialized farming practices increase the risk of emerging infectious diseases. The truth is: influenza and coronaviruses can move fluidly between animal and human populations, and no quarantine or lockdown can change that.
Recent pandemic and virus threats such as H1N1 (swine flu) and H5N1 (bird flu) evolved on chicken and pig factory farms. H1N1 originated in the late 1990s on factory farms in North Carolina, before mutating and popping up again on factory farms in Mexico, and eventually leading to the 2009 H1N1 flu pandemic.
In its first year of circulation, in 2009, the H1N1 flu killed between 151,700-575,400 people worldwide. While the full history of the emergence of COVID-19 remains unknown, there’s no ambiguity when it comes to the fact that industrialized factory farms are breeding grounds for viruses and future pandemics.
Factory farms are as dangerous as “wet markets”
While it’s easy to point fingers at “wet markets,” the next zoonotic pandemic could easily arise from factory farms. In fact, the unscrupulous corporations that promote factory farming seem to understand just how dangerous the farming conditions are, as antibiotics are routinely used on animals at factory farms to prevent the spread of disease.
Roughly 70 percent of the “medically important” antibiotics in the U.S. are sold for animal agriculture. To make matters worse the overuse of antibiotics have led to widespread antibiotic resistance and superbugs, making once curable infections and diseases resistant to treatment, all of which fuels a perfect storm of pandemic possibility.
Commercial chicken farms have proven particularly dangerous. It’s on factory chicken farms that scientists have most frequently found viruses that have mutated from a form found only in animals to a form that’s harmful to humans.
Acknowledge the link between animal and human health
No doubt, corporate agriculture is a broken system that puts us at risk of future pandemics. History and research have shown that zoonotic viruses can easily spill over to humans from animals and that factory farms act as amplifiers for that spillover.
The big question: what can we do?
We can go organic, support local, family farms, or simply avoid animal products altogether. Bottom line: we can eat differently (while improving our health) and still enjoy our food.
In addition, we can support advocacy organizations that oppose factory farming. Most importantly, we can be aware of the dangers of industrial factory farming, and then do our part to contribute to the change we want to see in this world.
Sources for this article include:
Organicconsumers.org
Uspirg.com


naturalhealth365--2020-06-22--Toxic “healthy” habit: Collagen supplements contaminated with heavy metals

( NaturalHealth365 ) The word collagen comes from the Greek word for “ glue.
” It ’ s a structural protein that binds cells and tissues together , helping them maintain their shape .
Collagen makes up 80 percent of our skin .
As we age , the body produces less and less collagen , resulting in signs of skin aging and joint pain .
In fact , starting in our 20s , we begin losing 1 percent of our collagen each year .
In a bid to turn back the clock and maintain a healthy glow , consumers have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ habit that has origins in China – Chinese women have viewed collagen as a fountain of youth for centuries , routinely consuming pig ’ s feet and shark fins – but which has recently been endorsed and marketed by American celebrities .
In 2020 , U.S. consumers are expected to spend over $ 293 million on collagen supplements , up from $ 50 million 2014 .
The popular health habit , which has come under fire for being an edible hoax , is far more dangerous than any “ placebo miracle pill.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ derived from industrial factory farms and contain heavy metals !
Heavy metals are worse than a spoonful of pseudoscience While images of grazing cows , open pastures and cage-free chickens often grace the packaging on collagen supplements , followed by labels claiming that they ’ re “ Pure ” and “ All “ Natural , ” most collagen supplements are neither pure or all natural .
The Organic Consumers Association and Clean Label Project recently tested 28 of Amazon ’ s best selling collagen supplements .
The results are as follows : Do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ toxic indoor air .
These chemicals - the 'off-gassing ' of paints , mattresses , carpets and other home/office building materials - increase your risk of headaches , dementia , heart disease and cancer .
Get the BEST indoor air purification system - at the LOWEST price , exclusively for NaturalHealth365 readers .
I , personally use this system in my home AND office .
Click HERE to order now - before the sale ends .
64 % tested positive for measurable levels of arsenic 37 % tested positive for measurable levels of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ levels of mercury 17 % tested positive for measurable levels of cadmium How dangerous are heavy metals ?
Some heavy metals are classified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) as known or probable carcinogens .
Even at low levels , heavy metals can cause organ damage .
For example , low levels of lead exposure has been linked to various neurological impacts , and chronic cadmium exposure has been linked to kidney , liver , and bone damage .
Animals raised on industrial factory farms ( CAFO ’ s ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Over the course of a year , concentrated animal feeding operations are said to generate over 575 billion tons of manure containing everything from nitrogen and phosphorous to antibiotics , bacterial endotoxins , and heavy metals .
Here ’ s a key point : if you ’ re going to purchase collagen supplements , buy “ certified organic ” only .
Consumers love the powder form in their breakfast smoothies and post-gym shakes .
But , whether this will make your skin look dewy and fresh and your bones and nails strong remains @ @ @ @ @ @ @ after ingredient has as many detractors as it has supporters .
Still , one thing is for certain : if you want to take collagen as part of your health routine , be sure to use certified organic products only !
Due to the fact that 99 percent of U.S. farm animals live on factory farms , discovering safe products might be a lot like … finding the fountain of youth .

(NaturalHealth365) The word collagen comes from the Greek word for “glue.” It’s a structural protein that binds cells and tissues together, helping them maintain their shape.
Collagen makes up 80 percent of our skin. As we age, the body produces less and less collagen, resulting in signs of skin aging and joint pain. In fact, starting in our 20s, we begin losing 1 percent of our collagen each year.
In a bid to turn back the clock and maintain a healthy glow, consumers have turned to collagen supplements, a health habit that has origins in China – Chinese women have viewed collagen as a fountain of youth for centuries, routinely consuming pig’s feet and shark fins – but which has recently been endorsed and marketed by American celebrities.
In 2020, U.S. consumers are expected to spend over $293 million on collagen supplements, up from $50 million 2014. The popular health habit, which has come under fire for being an edible hoax, is far more dangerous than any “placebo miracle pill.” In fact, many collagen supplements are derived from industrial factory farms and contain heavy metals!
Heavy metals are worse than a spoonful of pseudoscience
While images of grazing cows, open pastures and cage-free chickens often grace the packaging on collagen supplements, followed by labels claiming that they’re “Pure” and “All “Natural,” most collagen supplements are neither pure or all natural.
The Organic Consumers Association and Clean Label Project recently tested 28 of Amazon’s best selling collagen supplements. The results are as follows:
64% tested positive for measurable levels of arsenic
37% tested positive for measurable levels of lead
34% tested positive for trace levels of mercury
17% tested positive for measurable levels of cadmium
How dangerous are heavy metals? Some heavy metals are classified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as known or probable carcinogens. Even at low levels, heavy metals can cause organ damage.
For example, low levels of lead exposure has been linked to various neurological impacts, and chronic cadmium exposure has been linked to kidney, liver, and bone damage.
Beware: Collagen supplements made from animals raised on industrial factory farms
Animals raised on industrial factory farms (CAFO’s) are routinely exposed to heavy metals. Over the course of a year, concentrated animal feeding operations are said to generate over 575 billion tons of manure containing everything from nitrogen and phosphorous to antibiotics, bacterial endotoxins, and heavy metals.
Here’s a key point: if you’re going to purchase collagen supplements, be sure to avoid “pure and natural” claims; look for grass-fed or organic (if possible) and call the company directly to see if it’s heavy metal tested.
Consumers love the powder form in their breakfast smoothies and post-gym shakes. But, whether this will make your skin look dewy and fresh and your bones and nails strong remains to be seen. The widely sought after ingredient has as many detractors as it has supporters.
Still, one thing is for certain: if you want to take collagen as part of your health routine, be sure to use certified organic products only! Due to the fact that 99 percent of U.S. farm animals live on factory farms, discovering safe products might be a lot like … finding the fountain of youth.
Sources for this article include:
Organicconsumer.org


naturalhealth365--2020-06-22--World Health Organization scrambling to save credibility: Recants admission that asymptomatic spread

World Health Organization scrambling to save credibility: Recants admission that asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 is “very rare”

( NaturalHealth365 ) Here ’ s a reasonable assumption : if it ’ s unlikely for an asymptomatic carrier of COVID-19 to spread the viral infection , then the measures made in response to the current pandemic outbreak – like business closures , mass surveillance , and compulsory face masks – were probably overblown at best , and at worst a serious infringement on the public ’ s unalienable right to pursue life , liberty , and the pursuit of happiness .
Of course , all along we ’ ve been made to believe by some officials that asymptomatic spread @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic disease .
So , it ’ s a hard pill to swallow when the beleaguered World Health Organization ( WHO ) recently admitted – then later , with their tail between their legs , changed their mind on the matter – that asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 is rare .
Oops : After admitting asymptomatic spread is rare , WHO backtracks and tries to waters down their stance On June 8 2020 , the WHO held one of their weekly virtual press conferences ( a transcript is availble online ) .
During the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lead Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove admitted that asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 “ appears to be rare.
” Dr. Van Kerkhove cited international contract tracing data , much of which is as-yet unpublished , which suggests that officials are “ not finding secondary transmission onward ” of the novel coronavirus from asymptomatic people .
“ Asymptomatic spread ” simply means that an infectious agent is passed from an infected person to another person , even if the infected person doesn ’ t appear to be sick .
The admission stunned and confused people , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the backlash , Dr. Van Kerkhove tried to ease off her official statement the very next day .
She claimed that far from being “ very rare , ” the rate of asymptomatic spread at this time is simply unknown .
Do NOT ignore the health dangers linked to toxic indoor air .
These chemicals - the 'off-gassing ' of paints , mattresses , carpets and other home/office building materials - increase your risk of headaches , dementia , heart disease and cancer .
Get the BEST indoor air purification system - at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ readers .
I , personally use this system in my home AND office .
Click HERE to order now - before the sale ends .
Okay .
Meanwhile , we ’ ve been told all along that asymptomatic transmission is happening a lot – or at least enough to justify all the modeling guidelines used by public health officials to close down the economy .
Surprise surprise , other officials wasted no time responding to WHO ’ s admission , and launched some considerable damage control to quell the uproar .
As officials @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is left in the fray as restrictions continue to tighten in some states In a June 8 Twitter thread , director of Harvard Global Health Institute Dr. Ashish K. Jha “ reassured ” his followers at least 20 percent of people who get COVID-19 are truly asymptomatic .
He further claimed that up to 60 percent of the spread comes from people who don ’ t have symptoms .
He and other officials say it ’ d be more accurate to refer to this unknown issue as “ presymptomatic ” spread instead of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus can spread it to others during the virus ’ s “ incubation period ” ( the time from first infection to the onset of first symptoms ) , which can supposedly can last up to two weeks for the novel coronavirus .
A more recent narrative review published in the Annals of Internal Medicine asserts that asymptomatic spread accounts for a slightly more conservative estimate of 45 percent of COVID cases , yet is still “ a significant factor in the rapid progression of COVID-19.
” And , we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contact tracing , forced use of face masks ( hi , Governor Newsom ! )
, forced quarantine , and so on .
Critics blast the review for making broad claims that are simply unsubstantiated by the evidence so far .
So , who to believe ?
As we ’ ve maintained all along , we understand that it ’ s tough to come to firm conclusions about a new illness people are learning about .
But if we are making concessions and giving leeway for this uncertainty , why make such broad @ @ @ @ @ @ @ serious repurcussions which very well may echo into the future ?

(NaturalHealth365) Here’s a reasonable assumption: if it’s unlikely for an asymptomatic carrier of COVID-19 to spread the viral infection, then the measures made in response to the current pandemic outbreak – like business closures, mass surveillance, and compulsory face masks – were probably overblown at best, and at worst a serious infringement on the public’s unalienable right to pursue life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Of course, all along we’ve been made to believe by some officials that asymptomatic spread is a major force driving behind the pandemic disease. So, it’s a hard pill to swallow when the beleaguered World Health Organization (WHO) recently admitted – then later, with their tail between their legs, changed their mind on the matter – that asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 is rare.
Oops: After admitting asymptomatic spread is rare, WHO backtracks and tries to water down their stance
On June 8 2020, the WHO held one of their weekly virtual press conferences (a transcript is available (online). During the conference, the WHO’s technical lead Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove admitted that asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 “appears to be rare.”
Dr. Van Kerkhove cited international contract tracing data, much of which is as-yet unpublished, which suggests that officials are “not finding secondary transmission onward” of the novel coronavirus from asymptomatic people. “Asymptomatic spread” simply means that an infectious agent is passed from an infected person to another person, even if the infected person doesn’t appear to be sick.
The admission stunned and confused people, to say the least.
Responding to the backlash, Dr. Van Kerkhove tried to ease off her official statement the very next day. She claimed that far from being “very rare,” the rate of asymptomatic spread at this time is simply unknown.
Okay. Meanwhile, we’ve been told all along that asymptomatic transmission is happening a lot – or at least enough to justify all the modeling guidelines used by public health officials to close down the economy.
Surprise surprise, other officials wasted no time responding to WHO’s admission, and launched some considerable damage control to quell the uproar.
As officials flip flop on COVID-19, the public is left in the fray as restrictions continue to tighten in some states
In a June 8 Twitter thread, director of Harvard Global Health Institute Dr. Ashish K. Jha “reassured” his followers at least 20 percent of people who get COVID-19 are truly asymptomatic. He further claimed that up to 60 percent of the spread comes from people who don’t have symptoms.
He and other officials say it’d be more accurate to refer to this unknown issue as “presymptomatic” spread instead of asymptomatic. Presymptomatic means a person newly infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus can spread it to others during the virus’s “incubation period” (the time from first infection to the onset of first symptoms), which can supposedly can last up to two weeks for the novel coronavirus.
A more recent narrative review published in the Annals of Internal Medicine asserts that asymptomatic spread accounts for a slightly more conservative estimate of 45 percent of COVID cases, yet is still “a significant factor in the rapid progression of COVID-19.” And, we can assume, a legitimate justification for contact tracing, forced use of face masks (hi, Governor Newsom!), forced quarantine, and so on.
Critics blast the review for making broad claims that are simply unsubstantiated by the evidence so far. So, who to believe?
As we’ve maintained all along, we understand that it’s tough to come to firm conclusions about a new illness people are learning about. But if we are making concessions and giving leeway for this uncertainty, why make such broad statements and public health restrictions that can create such negative consequences in the future?
Sources for this article include:
CNBC.com
ACPjournals.org
Statnews.com
WHO.int
Forbes.com
ScienceDaily.com
MedRXiv.org
MedRXiv.org
Twitter.com
USAToday.com


naturalhealth365--2020-06-23--Why is the hidden epidemic of chronic kidney disease being ignored?

( NaturalHealth365 ) Chronic kidney disease ( CKD ) , a serious condition in which damaged kidneys can ’ t properly filter toxins from the blood , is the ninth leading cause of death worldwide .
Over a third of diabetics are estimated to have chronic kidney disease – and type 2 diabetes is now the leading cause of kidney failure in the United States .
A new observational study identifies the shocking failure of many primary care physicians to diagnose chronic kidney disease in their diabetic patients .
But , the “ silver lining ” is that the research @ @ @ @ @ @ @ need for early detection of kidney disease in diabetic patients – along with the need for more kidney-supportive therapies .
Study reveals : While one third of all diabetic patients have chronic kidney disease , almost half of these may be undiagnosed In a study involving 123,000 patients with type 2 diabetes and lab-confirmed chronic kidney disease , researchers found that nearly half of them had not received a chronic kidney disease diagnosis from their primary care doctor .
Of those with severe loss of kidney function ( described as Stage 3 kidney @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were undiagnosed by their doctors .
And , in patients in actual kidney failure ( Stage 5 ) , 4.2 percent had no record of a diagnosis of kidney disease .
Patients who had visited a nephrologist ( kidney specialist ) had better odds of being correctly diagnosed , with the doctors failing to recognize kidney disease only 6.5 percent of the time .
The odds also improved when the patients had sought treatment for complications of type 2 diabetes , including neuropathy and retinopathy .
People between 55 and 69 years old @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , with diagnosis odds improving in patients over 70 .
The study , conducted by Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies , was presented last May at the National Kidney Foundation ’ s Spring Clinical Meetings in Boston .
Study leader George Bakris , M.D.
, commented that the study helped to highlight the importance of identifying kidney disease in its early stages .
Only 12 percent of diabetic patients with CKD properly diagnosed , study reveals An earlier study yielded even more troubling results .
In 2014 , a National Kidney Foundation study involving 9,339 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this troubling conclusion : of the 5,036 patients found to have CKD , only 12 percent had been diagnosed by their primary care practitioners !
Obviously , many doctors are failing to make that all-important “ catch ” ( diagnosing chronic kidney disease ) – and this appears to be the case a shocking 88 percent of the time !
In this particular study , doctors did better when diagnosing more advanced chronic kidney disease .
While they only caught 1.1 percent of cases of Stage 1 kidney disease , they identified 52.9 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ percent of stage 5 cases .
Regardless , the study showed that across the board , almost half ( 47 percent ) of the clinicians did not identify any of their patients as having chronic kidney disease .
Joseph Vassalotti , M.D.
, the Chief Medical Officer of the National Kidney Foundation , characterized primary care clinicians as the “ first line of defense ” in identifying early kidney problems in diabetic patients – and he called for doctors to do better .
“ We are missing important opportunities to prevent kidney failure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ most at risk , ” warned Dr. Vassalotti .
The findings spurred the National Kidney Foundation ( NKF ) to develop community programs offering ACR ( albumin/creatinine ratio ) screenings , a reliable way of identifying kidney disease .
The organization also launched a Primary Care Initiative – which includes avoiding the use of kidney-damaging anti-inflammatory drugs and using kidney-protective medications such as ACE inhibitors and ARBs ( angiotensin receptor blockers ) .
Health alert : High blood pressure is the second leading cause of end-stage kidney disease in the United States High @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a result of chronic kidney disease .
In addition , 16.7 percent of people with diagnosed high blood pressure are estimated to also have type 2 diabetes , putting these individuals at even greater risk for kidney problems .
In a study published in Hypertension in 2010 , doctors evaluated the prevalence of chronic kidney disease in people with undiagnosed hypertension or prehypertension – and found it be 17.3 percent and 22 percent , respectively .
The study showed that 27 percent of people with diagnosed hypertension ( over 140 mm/hG in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over 90 mm/hG in the diastolic ) had kidney disease as well , as compared to 13.4 percent of people with normal blood pressure .
Clearly , having elevated blood pressure and/or type 2 diabetes does the kidneys no favors !
Significantly , even people without diabetes – but with “ high normal ” blood pressure – had triple the risk of eventually developing end-stage renal disease .
Keep in mind , if you have been diagnosed with high blood pressure , experts recommend to get your creatinine levels measured at least once @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a variety of herbs and nutrients can help protect and support healthy kidney function .
For instance , cranberries are packed with proanthocyanins – natural plant pigments with potent antioxidant , antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties .
You can obtain their kidney-protective benefits by drinking organic cranberry juice or taking cranberry supplements .
Natural health experts may also advise ginkgo biloba to help neutralize toxins in the kidneys .
And , marshmallow root is rich in mucilage – a natural demulcent and diuretic with soothing and cleansing effects .
In addition , Uva ursi @ @ @ @ @ @ @ astringent qualities that help tone the urinary tract and “ flush ” the kidneys .
Horsetail , celery seeds , hydrangea root and dandelion leaves are also time-honored herbal remedies that may help support the health of your kidneys .
Of course , check first with your integrative doctor before supplementing .
With the prevalence of type 2 diabetes continuing to rise around the world , chronic kidney disease is one of the most serious health challenges we face today .
And , while – conventionally speaking – there is no “ cure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ simple steps may prevent or delay its progression , thereby helping to keep people off dialysis and even prolonging their lives .
No doubt , this under-recognized epidemic has been hidden far too long .

(NaturalHealth365) Chronic kidney disease (CKD), a serious condition in which damaged kidneys can’t properly filter toxins from the blood, is the ninth leading cause of death worldwide. Over a third of diabetics are estimated to have chronic kidney disease – and type 2 diabetes is now the leading cause of kidney failure in the United States.
A new observational study identifies the shocking failure of many primary care physicians to diagnose chronic kidney disease in their diabetic patients. But, the “silver lining” is that the research is triggering a new awareness of the need for early detection of kidney disease in diabetic patients – along with the need for more kidney-supportive therapies.
Study reveals: While one third of all diabetic patients have chronic kidney disease, almost half of these may be undiagnosed
In a study involving 123,000 patients with type 2 diabetes and lab-confirmed chronic kidney disease, researchers found that nearly half of them had not received a chronic kidney disease diagnosis from their primary care doctor.
Of those with severe loss of kidney function (described as Stage 3 kidney disease), an astonishing 10.8 percent were undiagnosed by their doctors. And, in patients in actual kidney failure (Stage 5), 4.2 percent had no record of a diagnosis of kidney disease.
Patients who had visited a nephrologist (kidney specialist) had better odds of being correctly diagnosed, with the doctors failing to recognize kidney disease only 6.5 percent of the time. The odds also improved when the patients had sought treatment for complications of type 2 diabetes, including neuropathy and retinopathy.
People between 55 and 69 years old were at highest risk for going undiagnosed, with diagnosis odds improving in patients over 70.
The study, conducted by Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies, was presented last May at the National Kidney Foundation’s Spring Clinical Meetings in Boston. Study leader George Bakris, M.D., commented that the study helped to highlight the importance of identifying kidney disease in its early stages.
Only 12 percent of diabetic patients with CKD properly diagnosed, study reveals
An earlier study yielded even more troubling results.
In 2014, a National Kidney Foundation study involving 9,339 patients with type 2 diabetes came to this troubling conclusion: of the 5,036 patients found to have CKD, only 12 percent had been diagnosed by their primary care practitioners!
Obviously, many doctors are failing to make that all-important “catch” (diagnosing chronic kidney disease) – and this appears to be the case a shocking 88 percent of the time!
In this particular study, doctors did better when diagnosing more advanced chronic kidney disease. While they only caught 1.1 percent of cases of Stage 1 kidney disease, they identified 52.9 percent of stage 4 cases and 58.8 percent of stage 5 cases.
Regardless, the study showed that across the board, almost half (47 percent) of the clinicians did not identify any of their patients as having chronic kidney disease.
Joseph Vassalotti, M.D., the Chief Medical Officer of the National Kidney Foundation, characterized primary care clinicians as the “first line of defense” in identifying early kidney problems in diabetic patients – and he called for doctors to do better.
“We are missing important opportunities to prevent kidney failure, dialysis and cardiovascular events in those most at risk,” warned Dr. Vassalotti. The findings spurred the National Kidney Foundation (NKF) to develop community programs offering ACR (albumin/creatinine ratio) screenings, a reliable way of identifying kidney disease.
The organization also launched a Primary Care Initiative – which includes avoiding the use of kidney-damaging anti-inflammatory drugs and using kidney-protective medications such as ACE inhibitors and ARBs (angiotensin receptor blockers).
Health alert: High blood pressure is the second leading cause of end-stage kidney disease in the United States
High blood pressure is both a cause and a result of chronic kidney disease. In addition, 16.7 percent of people with diagnosed high blood pressure are estimated to also have type 2 diabetes, putting these individuals at even greater risk for kidney problems.
In a study published in Hypertension in 2010, doctors evaluated the prevalence of chronic kidney disease in people with undiagnosed hypertension or prehypertension – and found it be 17.3 percent and 22 percent, respectively.
The study showed that 27 percent of people with diagnosed hypertension (over 140 mm/hG in the top, or systolic, measurement and over 90 mm/hG in the diastolic) had kidney disease as well, as compared to 13.4 percent of people with normal blood pressure.
Clearly, having elevated blood pressure and/or type 2 diabetes does the kidneys no favors! Significantly, even people without diabetes – but with “high normal” blood pressure – had triple the risk of eventually developing end-stage renal disease.
Keep in mind, if you have been diagnosed with high blood pressure, experts recommend to get your creatinine levels measured at least once or twice a year.
Support kidney health naturally with herbs and supplements
Fortunately, a variety of herbs and nutrients can help protect and support healthy kidney function.
For instance, cranberries are packed with proanthocyanins – natural plant pigments with potent antioxidant, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties. You can obtain their kidney-protective benefits by drinking organic cranberry juice or taking cranberry supplements.
Natural health experts may also advise ginkgo biloba to help neutralize toxins in the kidneys. And, marshmallow root is rich in mucilage – a natural demulcent and diuretic with soothing and cleansing effects.
In addition, Uva ursi (also known as bearberry) has astringent qualities that help tone the urinary tract and “flush” the kidneys. Horsetail, celery seeds, hydrangea root and dandelion leaves are also time-honored herbal remedies that may help support the health of your kidneys.
Of course, check first with your integrative doctor before supplementing.
With the prevalence of type 2 diabetes continuing to rise around the world, chronic kidney disease is one of the most serious health challenges we face today. And, while – conventionally speaking – there is no “cure,” recognizing the disease and performing simple steps may prevent or delay its progression, thereby helping to keep people off dialysis and even prolonging their lives.
No doubt, this under-recognized epidemic has been hidden far too long.
Sources for this article include:
NationalKidneyFoundation.org
NIH.gov
GlobalHealing.com