offguardian--2020-08-28--The COVID19 Scamdemic – Part 1

The COVID19 Scamdemic – Part 1

Among many similar globalist states , The UK State is a public-private partnership between government , financial institutions , multinational corporations , global think tanks , and well funded third sector organisations , such as so called non governmental organisations ( NGO ’ s ) and large international charities .
Through a labyrinthine structure of direct funding , grant making and philanthropy , the UK State is a cohesive globalist organisation that works with selected academics , scientific institutions and mainstream media ( MSM ) outlets to advance a tightly controlled , predetermined narrative .
This designed consensus serves the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tiny group of disproportionately wealthy people .
This group of parasites , often misleadingly referred to as the “ elite , ” exploit all humanity for their own gain and to consolidate and enhance their power .
They control the money supply and the global debt , which is a debt owed to them .
Human beings are forced to pay tax which , via government procurement , flows directly to the private corporations they own .
War , security , infrastructure projects , education and health care provide profits and are used @ @ @ @ @ @ @ society .
Globally , they fund all political parties , with any realistic chance of gaining power , they own the MSM and spend billions lobbying policy makers .
Through think tanks and the actions of “ independent ” political activists , such as the FPAction Network , they directly fund political campaigns in exchange for the politician ’ s loyalty to them , not to the electorate .
Through their tax exempt grant making foundations , such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ( BMGF ) , they control the scientific @ @ @ @ @ @ @ global network of oligarchs is moving towards the final stages of its long held plan to construct a single global system of governance .
Often referred to as the New World Order ( NWO ) , it is a collaboration between supranational political organisations , like the United Nations and the European Union , controlled scientific authorities , such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( IPCC ) and the World Health Organisation ( WHO ) , global financial institutions , including the World Bank , IMF , ECB and Bank for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ organisations like the World Economic Forum ( WEF ) , NGO ’ s like the World Wildlife Fund ( WWF ) and policy making thinks tanks such as the Council on Foreign Relations ( CFR ) , Club of Rome and the Trilateral Commission .
The UK State is one , prominent tentacle of the emerging global governance system .
It has capitalised on the COVID 19 crisis to create the conditions for a new global economic and political model .
While COVID 19 appears to be a nasty strain of the common @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discuss how the UK State has spun a fake narrative about the disease to further the interests of it ’ s globalist , oligarch masters .
Managing a response to a pandemic is merely the deceptive justification for the planned re-engineering of society .
In partnership with Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and the BMGF , the WEF were chief architects of Event 201 which plotted , in quite precise detail , the global lockdown and the world ’ s media response to a global coronavirus pandemic .
Event 201 was staged @ @ @ @ @ @ @ global coronavirus pandemic broke out .
Both the government lockdown and MSM response have proceeded exactly as they predicted .
To say this is all just a coincidence , and not worthy of further scrutiny , is beyond obtuse .
The WEF ’ s extensive and detailed COVID 19 Action Platform was up and running on March 12th 2020 .
The day after the WHO declared a global COVID 19 pandemic .
It is clear from the WEF ’ s own words , that they see COVID 19 as a fantastic opportunity .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the political , economic and social disruptions it has caused , is fundamentally changing the traditional context for decision-making…….As we enter a unique window of opportunity to shape the recovery , this initiative will offer insights to help inform all those determining the future state of global relations , the direction of national economies , the priorities of societies , the nature of business models and the management of a global commons.
” This is a proposal for global governance which supersedes national sovereignty .
It is as simple as that .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ so many who accuse any who point to this long standing New World Order plan , extensively documented and spoken about by political leaders for generations , of being so called conspiracy theorists .
One wonders if these people can read .
Referencing the COVID 19 opportunities , one of the founders , and current executive chairman , of the WEF Klaus Schwab recently wrote : Capitalism requires a reset because the model of closed shop crony capitalism , operated by the global parasite class for centuries , has reached the limits of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a new economic paradigm ( the Great Reset ) both to further centralise and consolidate their power and to fix their failing business model .
Following the 2008 banking collapse , while the people were forced to suffer austerity to bail out the banks with a form of highly selective crony socialism , the parasite class simply carried on piling up the debt .
In the Basel Capital Accords III , supposedly designed to stop the wild market speculations of banks which caused the collapse , they effectively reduced the liquidity ( capital @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them to lend even more .
This process of allowing banks to create FIAT currency out of nothing has inevitably led to a global debt of approximately $ 260 trillion , which is more than three times the size of the planets GDP .
However , this is small potatoes compared to the scale of the financial products derivatives market .
Estimated to be somewhere between $ 600 trillion to more than $ 1 quadrillion .
While some say this is only the notional amount of the debt tied up in derivative contracts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ debt .
Cumulatively , there isn ’ t enough productivity on Earth even to service the interest on these debts , let alone pay them .
Ultimately this is debt owed to the oligarchs who control the world ’ s system of central banks .
It is a Mickey Mouse system allowing monopolists to seize assets using their own funny money .
While the power to create all FIAT currency , out of nothing but debt creation , has afforded them immense economic and political control , 2008 demonstrated that their usury fraud @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Hence the Great Reset .
Responding to a pandemic , or saving lives , has nothing to do with it .
The process of transition , laid out by the WEF as the Great Reset , builds upon the sustainable development goals of the U.N ’ s Agenda 2030 .
Founded upon the generational eugenicist ideology of the NWO oligarchs , the new global governance system will be a technocracy .
While Technocracy , rule by technocrats appointed or elected for their particular expertise , may sound appealing to some , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nations states to be replaced by a distant global technocratic order that serves only the interests of its founding oligarchs and financial benefactors .
This technocratic system was outlined in 1974 by former US ambassador Richard N. Gardner , member of the CFR and the Trilateral Commission , in his article The Hard Road To World Order : The institutions of limited jurisdiction , such as the IPCC and WHO , are already in place directing national government policy across the world .
In Britain , it is the role of the UK @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in order to erode national sovereignty and create the global governance technocracy .
All globalist states are essentially unconstitutional and treasonous .
The common interest , determined by the technocrat class at the behest of their corporate oligarch paymasters , is currently replacing individual liberties and freedoms .
The human being is becoming little more than a unit to be managed and directed and , where necessary , disposed of .
Inalienable human rights are being ignored utterly in pursuit of the common interest .
The global COVID 19 crisis is a catalysing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about the Great Reset .
In order to convince the people to comply with their orders , the UK State has inculcated the population into a state of fear .
States around the world have practised social engineering using deception , by proselytising an unquestioning faith in an illusory form of science ( scientism ) , behaviour modification , unlawful regulation and propaganda .
They have used their obedient MSM to convince their peoples that the threat of COVID 19 is significantly greater than it actually is .
In Part 2 we will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ State .
However , the same can be said for all other globalist states that have similarly responded to the claimed pandemic .
COVID 19 has been exploited in order to replace our inalienable human rights with an enforced obligation to obey public health orders .
Public health has become biosecurity and there is no longer any such thing as a healthy human being .
All humans are now biohazards and biohazards must be controlled or removed from society for the common good .
With the British people living in unwarranted fear , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ introduce draconian anti-democratic ( quite literally ) legislation .
In other circumstances this would have been impossible without significant revolt .
Terrorising the public was essential to convince them to believe that the State had to remove all their rights and freedoms in order to keep them safe .
Initially deceiving the public that the “ emergency measures ” would be temporary , further behaviour modification was then used to force people to comply with a lengthening list of totalitarian regulations .
The objective was to move people towards passively accepting the dictatorship @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the new normal.
” Thus far , it appears most people have been sufficiently frightened to meekly accept their enslavement .
Throughout the Great Reset transition , the public face of the globalist project has been Bill Gates .
However , while Gates has used his wealth to seize control of global public health policy , he is just the current front man for World Order 2.0 .
It is the technological possibilities presented by the 4th Industrial Revolution which the architects of the world order are capitalising upon .
For example , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 19 can be spread by handling cash , the MSM have repeatedly floated the idea .
This is no suprise .
the BBC are among the many media organisations directly funded by the BMGF .
Pilot schemes , such as the BMGF backed West African Wellness Pass , are already underway .
By linking biometric identification , along the lines of the BMGF funded , Rockefeller and U.N backed ID 2020 , with cashless payment systems , all transactions can be centrally controlled in the rapidly approaching cashless society .
When your biometric @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there will be no necessity to legislate to make vaccines “ compulsory.
” Thus avoiding any contentious public debate .
As long as you fully comply with your orders , you will be allowed controlled access to social and economic activity .
Systems like immunity passport and vaccine certificates will be used to control freedom of movement , the right to work and to access services and the community .
As described by world order spokesman Bill Gates : While vaccines may not be compulsory you won ’ t realistically be able to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a business or receive benefits , without the appropriate vaccine or immunity status .
The BMGF have already invested more than $ 21 million in an MIT project to create a microneedle vaccine delivery system that will inject a reactive die under the recipients skin which can then be scanned by a reader .
This pattern will act like an indelible bar code tattoo , enabling the global authorities to monitor and control your whereabouts and behaviour .
The New Zealand State has already decided to remove people from their homes and place @ @ @ @ @ @ @ controlled by the military ) .
With an estimated population of 5 million and just 22 alleged deaths from COVID 19 in the entire country ( a population mortality risk of 0.0004 % ) , and no deaths at all for nearly three months , clearly these measures are not a response to any genuine threat from COVID 19 .
Having complete control over the testing and attribution of disease status affords the biosecurity State the power to potentially remove and detain its political enemies and dissenters without trial .
Those ordered to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ normal , ” have exactly the same degree of authoritarian power that was invested in similar rights abusers such as the Gestapo and the Stasi .
Does history ever teach us anything ?
This quarantine policy in New Zealand is designed to maintain the level of fear and accustom the population to dictatorship .
It also appears to be a provocation that may encourage insurrection and revolt .
With a monopoly on violence and the use of force , violent uprisings invariably benefit the authoritarian State .
It allows them to claim legitimacy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ down.
” Thus far , the global response to COVID 19 has deviated little from the Rockefeller ’ s suggested Lockstep scenario in their 2010 report Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development .
Like Event 201 , this is another example of the quite extraordinary prescience of the people who form global governance policy .
They can not only predict , in almost perfect detail , what the media will discover and report , but also nature itself .
Removing the “ infected ” from their homes and incarcerating them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Dr Michael Ryan from the WHO .
While New Zealand is the first nominally democratic state to raid family homes and remove people by force , it certainly won ’ t be the last .
The UK State has already given itself the power to do so in the Health Protections ( Coronavirus ) Regulations 2020 .
World economic activity will be administered by biosecurity States and based upon sustainable development goals .
This new , centrally planned , global economy will be restricted only to permitted businesses .
Prior to his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ England , in lockstep with the Great Reset , Mark Carney warned that companies that don ’ t follow the correct sustainability policies , “ will go bankrupt without question.
” In other words , lines of credit , without which business can not hope to function , will be limited only to those who adopt the approved polices .
This new economy will have very limited employment .
Carney ’ s successor Andrew Bailey has already stated that it would be important not to keep people in “ unproductive jobs ” and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the COVID 19 crisis , were inevitable .
They would not have been inevitable had globalist State ’ s , like the UK , not responded to the crisis by shutting down the world ’ s productive economy .
The preposterous spin of the bankers and carefully chosen economists that the UK will simply bounce back from an unprecedented 20 % drop in GDP is absurd .
With official UK unemployment of 2.7 million , more than doubling in a single year , these numbers are merely the tip of a very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ currently an additional estimated 7.8 million British workers furloughed .
That scheme is due to end in a couple of months .
The management consultancy firm McKinsey & Company estimate that 7.6 million UK jobs are at risk .
This will , as ever , disproportionately impact the lowest paid , with analysis suggesting that more than 50 % of those at risk of unemployment are already in jobs paying less than £10 per hour .
These are the unproductive jobs and livelihoods Bailey wants to get rid of .
Across Europe and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seemingly unavoidable .
It is not unreasonable to envisage at least 6 million long term unemployed in the UK .
With the same pattern common to many developed nations , the social , economic and health impacts of this are almost beyond comprehension .
Many have long been warning , that the toll taken by the Lockdown response to the supposed COVID 19 pandemic will be far worse than the disease itself .
This awful prospect is becoming increasingly apparent .
There is no reason to believe official UK COVID 19 statistics , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2 .
However , even if we accept that more than 41,000 people have died as a direct result of COVID 19 , this sad loss is likely to be relatively inconsequential compared to the loss of life as a direct result of the UK State ’ s Lockdown policy .
It is important to recognise that the global lockdown response was a political choice made to create the economic condition for the Great Reset .
It was not unavoidable , and there is no evidence that lockdowns make any difference to COVID @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Sweden did not impose full lockdowns and all have better COVID 19 outcomes that the UK .
Research by the UK Department of Health , the Office of National Statistics ( ONS ) , the government ’ s Actuary Department and the UK Home Office estimates that 200,000 people could die as a result of re-orientating the NHS , to treat COVID 19 and little else , and from the economic effects of Lockdown polices .
Unfortunately , this “ worst case ” scenario appears conservative .
An example of the derisory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ population , in April the University of Glasgow published a study estimating average years of life lost ( YLL ) for individuals who allegedly died from COVID 19 .
Saying these were alleged deaths does not imply that no one died from COVID 19 , only that we really have no idea how many .
Nonetheless , using quite bizarre methodology , the Glasgow researchers managed to calculate that the median YYL due to COVID 19 was 13 years for men and 11 years for women .
This study was based upon analysis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was cited by the UK MSM to scare the British .
More than 59 % of supposed COVID 19 decedents in Italy were over 80 years old .
Current median life expectancy in the UK is 80 years for males and 83 years for females .
Nearly 60 % of those who have died from COVID 19 in the UK were over 80 years old and 20 % were over 90 years old .
Analysis from the National Records of Scotland ( NRS ) shows that median age of death , supposedly from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and 85 for woman .
Statistically indistinguishable from quite normal mortality .
The University of Glasgow researchers are funded by the Wellcome Trust who are the tax exempt philanthropic foundation of the multinational pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline .
The University of Glasgow are also grant recipients of the COVID 19 Therapeutics Accelerator established by the Wellcome Trust , Mastercard and the BMGF .
The Wellcome Trust and the BMGF want the world to be vaccinated with their experimental COVID 19 vaccines .
Despite the fact that decades of trying have failed to produce a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for any coronavirus strain , and that usually vaccine development takes at least 10 years , GSK and the BMGF are among those who , for some apparently inexplicable reason , are confident they can produce a successful vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 in a matter of months .
Obviously there is a huge conflict of financial interest at the heart of the University of Glasgow ’ s spurious claims about YLL ’ s .
Pointing out this fact makes you a conspiracy theorist .
Though ignoring it requires either a considerable degree of gullibility @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Between 2001 and 2016 economic and social deprivation in England consistently accounted for a genuinely alarming 9.3 year average reduced life expectancy ( YLL ’ s ) for males and , by 2016 , shortened women ’ s lives by 7.4 years .
The economic devastation that will be wrought by the entirely unnecessary Lockdown policy of the UK State , and others , measured in YLL ’ s , will dwarf those lost to COVID 19 .
This is the price we will all pay for the parasite class ’ determination to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the world ’ s economy and society to one centrally planned and controlled absolutely by them .
They are currently spending billions globally on propaganda to convince us to accept their “ new normal.
” They require our consent if their plans are going to work .
This means , in order to scupper them , all we need to do is refuse to comply .
While peaceful protest is an important unifying right , ultimately it is what we do every day that will make the difference .
There is a nasty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and elsewhere .
Yet all we need to do in order to defeat it is refuse , en masse , to follow its orders .
Unfortunately , the UK State are among those throwing everything at convincing us to believe their frankly ridiculous , scientifically illiterate , COVID 19 propaganda narrative .
We only need wander to the local supermarket and witness the faceless , muzzled majority to know the deception is working .
We are faced with an existential choice .
We can either give up any childish pretensions that we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ society that values liberty and plurality of opinion , and accept the fascist dictatorial rule of a global technocratic parasite , or we can exercise conscious resistance and refuse to comply with the orders of the State .
In Part 2 , we will dissect the mechanism of the UK State ’ s scamdemic .
While Lockdown policies originate at a global level , by looking at how the UK State has implemented them , and the deception they have used to convince the public to accept them , the true nature of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can read more of Iain ’ s work at his blog In This Together

Among many similar globalist states, The UK State is a public-private partnership between government, financial institutions, multinational corporations, global think tanks, and well funded third sector organisations, such as so called non governmental organisations (NGO’s) and large international charities.
Through a labyrinthine structure of direct funding, grant making and philanthropy, the UK State is a cohesive globalist organisation that works with selected academics, scientific institutions and mainstream media (MSM) outlets to advance a tightly controlled, predetermined narrative. This designed consensus serves the the interests and global ambitions of a tiny group of disproportionately wealthy people.
This group of parasites, often misleadingly referred to as the “elite,” exploit all humanity for their own gain and to consolidate and enhance their power. They control the money supply and the global debt, which is a debt owed to them.
Human beings are forced to pay tax which, via government procurement, flows directly to the private corporations they own. War, security, infrastructure projects, education and health care provide profits and are used by the parasite class to socially engineer society.
Globally, they fund all political parties, with any realistic chance of gaining power, they own the MSM and spend billions lobbying policy makers.
Through think tanks and the actions of “independent” political activists, such as the FPAction Network, they directly fund political campaigns in exchange for the politician’s loyalty to them, not to the electorate.
Through their tax exempt grant making foundations, such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), they control the scientific, medical and academic orthodoxy.
This global network of oligarchs is moving towards the final stages of its long held plan to construct a single global system of governance. Often referred to as the New World Order (NWO), it is a collaboration between supranational political organisations, like the United Nations and the European Union, controlled scientific authorities, such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the World Health Organisation (WHO), global financial institutions, including the World Bank, IMF, ECB and Bank for International Settlements (BIS), globalist organisations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), NGO’s like the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and policy making thinks tanks such as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Club of Rome and the Trilateral Commission.
The UK State is one, prominent tentacle of the emerging global governance system. It has capitalised on the COVID 19 crisis to create the conditions for a new global economic and political model. While COVID 19 appears to be a nasty strain of the common coronavirus, in Part 2 we will discuss how the UK State has spun a fake narrative about the disease to further the interests of it’s globalist, oligarch masters. Managing a response to a pandemic is merely the deceptive justification for the planned re-engineering of society.
In partnership with Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and the BMGF, the WEF were chief architects of Event 201 which plotted, in quite precise detail, the global lockdown and the world’s media response to a global coronavirus pandemic. Event 201 was staged merely a matter of months before a global coronavirus pandemic broke out. Both the government lockdown and MSM response have proceeded exactly as they predicted.
To say this is all just a coincidence, and not worthy of further scrutiny, is beyond obtuse. The WEF’s extensive and detailed COVID 19 Action Platform was up and running on March 12th 2020. The day after the WHO declared a global COVID 19 pandemic.
It is clear from the WEF’s own words, that they see COVID 19 as a fantastic opportunity. They state:
The Covid-19 crisis, and the political, economic and social disruptions it has caused, is fundamentally changing the traditional context for decision-making…….As we enter a unique window of opportunity to shape the recovery, this initiative will offer insights to help inform all those determining the future state of global relations, the direction of national economies, the priorities of societies, the nature of business models and the management of a global commons.”
This is a proposal for global governance which supersedes national sovereignty. It is as simple as that.
It is remarkable that there are still so many who accuse any who point to this long standing New World Order plan, extensively documented and spoken about by political leaders for generations, of being so called conspiracy theorists. One wonders if these people can read.
Referencing the COVID 19 opportunities, one of the founders, and current executive chairman, of the WEF Klaus Schwab recently wrote:
A sharp economic downturn has already begun, and we could be facing the worst depression since the 1930s. But, while this outcome is likely, it is not unavoidable. To achieve a better outcome, the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions. Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a “Great Reset” of capitalism.
Capitalism requires a reset because the model of closed shop crony capitalism, operated by the global parasite class for centuries, has reached the limits of growth. Therefore they need to create a new economic paradigm (the Great Reset) both to further centralise and consolidate their power and to fix their failing business model.
Following the 2008 banking collapse, while the people were forced to suffer austerity to bail out the banks with a form of highly selective crony socialism, the parasite class simply carried on piling up the debt.
In the Basel Capital Accords III, supposedly designed to stop the wild market speculations of banks which caused the collapse, they effectively reduced the liquidity (capital reserve) requirements for banks, allowing them to lend even more.
This process of allowing banks to create FIAT currency out of nothing has inevitably led to a global debt of approximately $260 trillion, which is more than three times the size of the planets GDP.
However, this is small potatoes compared to the scale of the financial products derivatives market. Estimated to be somewhere between $600 trillion to more than $1 quadrillion. While some say this is only the notional amount of the debt tied up in derivative contracts, the fact remains this is all debt.
Cumulatively, there isn’t enough productivity on Earth even to service the interest on these debts, let alone pay them. Ultimately this is debt owed to the oligarchs who control the world’s system of central banks. It is a Mickey Mouse system allowing monopolists to seize assets using their own funny money.
While the power to create all FIAT currency, out of nothing but debt creation, has afforded them immense economic and political control, 2008 demonstrated that their usury fraud can, and certainly will, collapse. Hence the Great Reset. Responding to a pandemic, or saving lives, has nothing to do with it.
The process of transition, laid out by the WEF as the Great Reset, builds upon the sustainable development goals of the U.N’s Agenda 2030. Founded upon the generational eugenicist ideology of the NWO oligarchs, the new global governance system will be a technocracy.
While Technocracy, rule by technocrats appointed or elected for their particular expertise, may sound appealing to some, the model proposed relies upon the destruction of nations states to be replaced by a distant global technocratic order that serves only the interests of its founding oligarchs and financial benefactors.
This technocratic system was outlined in 1974 by former US ambassador Richard N. Gardner, member of the CFR and the Trilateral Commission, in his article The Hard Road To World Order:
Never has there been such widespread recognition by the world’s intellectual leadership of the necessity for cooperation and planning on a truly global basis. Never has there been such an extraordinary growth in the constructive potential of transnational private organizations—not just multinational corporations but international associations of every kind in which like-minded persons around the world weave effective patterns of global action […] The hope for the foreseeable future lies, not in building up a few ambitious central institutions of universal membership and general jurisdiction…….but rather in…..inventing or adapting institutions of limited jurisdiction and selected membership to deal with specific problems on a case-by-case basis […] providing methods for changing the law and enforcing it as it changes and developing the perception of common interests […] In short, the “house of world order” will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down […] but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.
The institutions of limited jurisdiction, such as the IPCC and WHO, are already in place directing national government policy across the world. In Britain, it is the role of the UK State to deliver the obligatory policy changes in order to erode national sovereignty and create the global governance technocracy. All globalist states are essentially unconstitutional and treasonous.
The common interest, determined by the technocrat class at the behest of their corporate oligarch paymasters, is currently replacing individual liberties and freedoms. The human being is becoming little more than a unit to be managed and directed and, where necessary, disposed of. Inalienable human rights are being ignored utterly in pursuit of the common interest.
The global COVID 19 crisis is a catalysing event which has been misused to bring about the Great Reset. In order to convince the people to comply with their orders, the UK State has inculcated the population into a state of fear.
States around the world have practised social engineering using deception, by proselytising an unquestioning faith in an illusory form of science (scientism), behaviour modification, unlawful regulation and propaganda. They have used their obedient MSM to convince their peoples that the threat of COVID 19 is significantly greater than it actually is.
In Part 2 we will focus on the deception of the UK State. However, the same can be said for all other globalist states that have similarly responded to the claimed pandemic.
COVID 19 has been exploited in order to replace our inalienable human rights with an enforced obligation to obey public health orders. Public health has become biosecurity and there is no longer any such thing as a healthy human being. All humans are now biohazards and biohazards must be controlled or removed from society for the common good.
With the British people living in unwarranted fear, the UK State has been able to introduce draconian anti-democratic (quite literally) legislation.
In other circumstances this would have been impossible without significant revolt. Terrorising the public was essential to convince them to believe that the State had to remove all their rights and freedoms in order to keep them safe.
Initially deceiving the public that the “emergency measures” would be temporary, further behaviour modification was then used to force people to comply with a lengthening list of totalitarian regulations. The objective was to move people towards passively accepting the dictatorship of a surveillance state re-branded as “the new normal.” Thus far, it appears most people have been sufficiently frightened to meekly accept their enslavement.
Throughout the Great Reset transition, the public face of the globalist project has been Bill Gates. However, while Gates has used his wealth to seize control of global public health policy, he is just the current front man for World Order 2.0. It is the technological possibilities presented by the 4th Industrial Revolution which the architects of the world order are capitalising upon.
For example, while there is no evidence that COVID 19 can be spread by handling cash, the MSM have repeatedly floated the idea. This is no suprise. the BBC are among the many media organisations directly funded by the BMGF.
Pilot schemes, such as the BMGF backed West African Wellness Pass, are already underway. By linking biometric identification, along the lines of the BMGF funded, Rockefeller and U.N backed ID 2020, with cashless payment systems, all transactions can be centrally controlled in the rapidly approaching cashless society.
When your biometric identity includes your vaccine immunity status, there will be no necessity to legislate to make vaccines “compulsory.” Thus avoiding any contentious public debate. As long as you fully comply with your orders, you will be allowed controlled access to social and economic activity.
Systems like immunity passport and vaccine certificates will be used to control freedom of movement, the right to work and to access services and the community. As described by world order spokesman Bill Gates:
Eventually we will have some digital certificates to show who has recovered or been tested recently or when we have a vaccine who has received it.”
While vaccines may not be compulsory you won’t realistically be able to participate in society, employment, run a business or receive benefits, without the appropriate vaccine or immunity status.
The BMGF have already invested more than $21 million in an MIT project to create a microneedle vaccine delivery system that will inject a reactive die under the recipients skin which can then be scanned by a reader. This pattern will act like an indelible bar code tattoo, enabling the global authorities to monitor and control your whereabouts and behaviour.
The New Zealand State has already decided to remove people from their homes and place them in quarantine facilities (detention centres controlled by the military).
With an estimated population of 5 million and just 22 alleged deaths from COVID 19 in the entire country (a population mortality risk of 0.0004%), and no deaths at all for nearly three months, clearly these measures are not a response to any genuine threat from COVID 19.
Having complete control over the testing and attribution of disease status affords the biosecurity State the power to potentially remove and detain its political enemies and dissenters without trial. Those ordered to enforce biosecurity, in the “new normal,” have exactly the same degree of authoritarian power that was invested in similar rights abusers such as the Gestapo and the Stasi. Does history ever teach us anything?
This quarantine policy in New Zealand is designed to maintain the level of fear and accustom the population to dictatorship. It also appears to be a provocation that may encourage insurrection and revolt. With a monopoly on violence and the use of force, violent uprisings invariably benefit the authoritarian State. It allows them to claim legitimacy for an even more oppressive “crack down.”
Thus far, the global response to COVID 19 has deviated little from the Rockefeller’s suggested Lockstep scenario in their 2010 report Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development.
Like Event 201, this is another example of the quite extraordinary prescience of the people who form global governance policy. They can not only predict, in almost perfect detail, what the media will discover and report, but also nature itself.
Removing the “infected” from their homes and incarcerating them in detention centres mirrors the policy suggestion of Dr Michael Ryan from the WHO. While New Zealand is the first nominally democratic state to raid family homes and remove people by force, it certainly won’t be the last. The UK State has already given itself the power to do so in the Health Protections (Coronavirus) Regulations 2020.
World economic activity will be administered by biosecurity States and based upon sustainable development goals. This new, centrally planned, global economy will be restricted only to permitted businesses.
Prior to his departure as governor of the Bank of England, in lockstep with the Great Reset, Mark Carney warned that companies that don’t follow the correct sustainability policies, “will go bankrupt without question.” In other words, lines of credit, without which business cannot hope to function, will be limited only to those who adopt the approved polices.
This new economy will have very limited employment. Carney’s successor Andrew Bailey has already stated that it would be important not to keep people in “unproductive jobs” and that job losses, as a result of the COVID 19 crisis, were inevitable.
They would not have been inevitable had globalist State’s, like the UK, not responded to the crisis by shutting down the world’s productive economy.
The preposterous spin of the bankers and carefully chosen economists that the UK will simply bounce back from an unprecedented 20% drop in GDP is absurd. With official UK unemployment of 2.7 million, more than doubling in a single year, these numbers are merely the tip of a very large, looming iceberg.
There are currently an additional estimated 7.8 million British workers furloughed. That scheme is due to end in a couple of months. The management consultancy firm McKinsey & Company estimate that 7.6 million UK jobs are at risk.
This will, as ever, disproportionately impact the lowest paid, with analysis suggesting that more than 50% of those at risk of unemployment are already in jobs paying less than £10 per hour.
These are the unproductive jobs and livelihoods Bailey wants to get rid of. Across Europe and the Americas staggering levels of unemployment are seemingly unavoidable. It is not unreasonable to envisage at least 6 million long term unemployed in the UK. With the same pattern common to many developed nations, the social, economic and health impacts of this are almost beyond comprehension.
Many have long been warning, that the toll taken by the Lockdown response to the supposed COVID 19 pandemic will be far worse than the disease itself. This awful prospect is becoming increasingly apparent.
There is no reason to believe official UK COVID 19 statistics, something we’ll discuss in Part 2. However, even if we accept that more than 41,000 people have died as a direct result of COVID 19, this sad loss is likely to be relatively inconsequential compared to the loss of life as a direct result of the UK State’s Lockdown policy.
It is important to recognise that the global lockdown response was a political choice made to create the economic condition for the Great Reset. It was not unavoidable, and there is no evidence that lockdowns make any difference to COVID 19 mortality. South Korea, Japan and Sweden did not impose full lockdowns and all have better COVID 19 outcomes that the UK.
Research by the UK Department of Health, the Office of National Statistics (ONS), the government’s Actuary Department and the UK Home Office estimates that 200,000 people could die as a result of re-orientating the NHS, to treat COVID 19 and little else, and from the economic effects of Lockdown polices. Unfortunately, this “worst case” scenario appears conservative.
An example of the derisory “scientism” used to terrorise the population, in April the University of Glasgow published a study estimating average years of life lost (YLL) for individuals who allegedly died from COVID 19. Saying these were alleged deaths does not imply that no one died from COVID 19, only that we really have no idea how many.
Nonetheless, using quite bizarre methodology, the Glasgow researchers managed to calculate that the median YYL due to COVID 19 was 13 years for men and 11 years for women. This study was based upon analysis of the outbreak in Italy, but was cited by the UK MSM to scare the British. More than 59% of supposed COVID 19 decedents in Italy were over 80 years old.
Current median life expectancy in the UK is 80 years for males and 83 years for females. Nearly 60% of those who have died from COVID 19 in the UK were over 80 years old and 20% were over 90 years old.
Analysis from the National Records of Scotland (NRS) shows that median age of death, supposedly from COVID 19, was 81 for men and 85 for woman. Statistically indistinguishable from quite normal mortality.
The University of Glasgow researchers are funded by the Wellcome Trust who are the tax exempt philanthropic foundation of the multinational pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline. The University of Glasgow are also grant recipients of the COVID 19 Therapeutics Accelerator established by the Wellcome Trust, Mastercard and the BMGF.
The Wellcome Trust and the BMGF want the world to be vaccinated with their experimental COVID 19 vaccines. Despite the fact that decades of trying have failed to produce a successful vaccine against SARS, or indeed for any coronavirus strain, and that usually vaccine development takes at least 10 years, GSK and the BMGF are among those who, for some apparently inexplicable reason, are confident they can produce a successful vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 in a matter of months.
Obviously there is a huge conflict of financial interest at the heart of the University of Glasgow’s spurious claims about YLL’s. Pointing out this fact makes you a conspiracy theorist. Though ignoring it requires either a considerable degree of gullibility or a wilful intent to deceive.
Between 2001 and 2016 economic and social deprivation in England consistently accounted for a genuinely alarming 9.3 year average reduced life expectancy (YLL’s) for males and, by 2016, shortened women’s lives by 7.4 years. The economic devastation that will be wrought by the entirely unnecessary Lockdown policy of the UK State, and others, measured in YLL’s, will dwarf those lost to COVID 19.
This is the price we will all pay for the parasite class’ determination to bring about the Great Reset and change the world’s economy and society to one centrally planned and controlled absolutely by them. They are currently spending billions globally on propaganda to convince us to accept their “new normal.”
They require our consent if their plans are going to work. This means, in order to scupper them, all we need to do is refuse to comply. While peaceful protest is an important unifying right, ultimately it is what we do every day that will make the difference. There is a nasty, fascist authoritarianism building in the UK, and elsewhere. Yet all we need to do in order to defeat it is refuse, en masse, to follow its orders.
Unfortunately, the UK State are among those throwing everything at convincing us to believe their frankly ridiculous, scientifically illiterate, COVID 19 propaganda narrative. We only need wander to the local supermarket and witness the faceless, muzzled majority to know the deception is working.
We are faced with an existential choice. We can either give up any childish pretensions that we live in a free and open democratic society that values liberty and plurality of opinion, and accept the fascist dictatorial rule of a global technocratic parasite, or we can exercise conscious resistance and refuse to comply with the orders of the State.
In Part 2, we will dissect the mechanism of the UK State’s scamdemic. While Lockdown policies originate at a global level, by looking at how the UK State has implemented them, and the deception they have used to convince the public to accept them, the true nature of the scamdemic can be revealed.
You can read more of Iain’s work at his blog In This Together


offguardian--2020-08-28--UPDATE: German Court Overturns Protest Ban

The Berlin Senate ’ s decision to ban the coronavirus protest planned for this weekend has been overturned by the Administrative Court .
That said , the protest will still be under some restrictions – the court ruled that the organizers must follow all the laws and restrictions they are protesting against .
According to a report from Deutsche Welle : …the judges said protest organizers and participants must provide barriers in front of the stages where speeches will be held — and must regularly remind participants to observe social distancing rules and keep their distance .
Wearing masks was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ guidelines for the protest .
The court ’ s decision can be appealed by the Senate , but given the timeframe that seems unlikely at this stage .
Many thousands were reportedly travelling to Berlin regardless , as it was thought the protest organizers intended to go ahead in spite of the ban .
A similar protest on August 1st ( pictured above ) drew tens of thousands of people .
The Berlin protest is taking place alongside other events around the world for a global day of action .
Protests are planned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Zurich .
If you have any information about other planned events , post them in the comments below and we ’ ll add them to the list .

The Berlin Senate’s decision to ban the coronavirus protest planned for this weekend has been overturned by the Administrative Court.
That said, the protest will still be under some restrictions – the court ruled that the organizers must follow all the laws and restrictions they are protesting against.
According to a report from Deutsche Welle:
…the judges said protest organizers and participants must provide barriers in front of the stages where speeches will be held — and must regularly remind participants to observe social distancing rules and keep their distance. Wearing masks was not included in the judge’s guidelines for the protest.
The court’s decision can be appealed by the Senate, but given the timeframe that seems unlikely at this stage.
Many thousands were reportedly travelling to Berlin regardless, as it was thought the protest organizers intended to go ahead in spite of the ban. A similar protest on August 1st (pictured above) drew tens of thousands of people.
The Berlin protest is taking place alongside other events around the world for a global day of action. Protests are planned for London, Ottawa, Paris and Zurich.
If you have any information about other planned events, post them in the comments below and we’ll add them to the list.


Faceless Beings

Faceless beings with muffled voices stare at me through dark sunken sockets full of fear and fright .
Muzzled and @ @ @ @ @ ; I see them here there and everywhere !
From dawn to dusk , from @ @ @ @ @ the streets , in the trains , on the beach and in the parks !
@ @ @ @ @ are !
Friends or foes ?
Neighbours or strangers ?
Ghosts or living dead ?
@ @ @ @ @ not all is lost !
One single uneffaced face fills me with boundless joy !
@ @ @ @ @ bare face makes my day !
One singe unmuffled “ hello ” is a ray @ @ @

Faceless beings with muffled voices
stare at me through dark sunken sockets
full of fear and fright.
Muzzled and mugged,
choked and tugged;
I see them
here
there
and everywhere!
From dawn to dusk,
from dusk to dawn;
on the streets, in the trains,
on the beach and in the parks!
I know not
who they are!
Friends or foes?
Neighbours or strangers?
Ghosts or living dead?
These faceless beings!
Yet not all is lost!
One single uneffaced face
fills me with boundless joy!
One single smile on a bare face
makes my day!
One single unmuffled “hello”
is a ray of hope!
Avadesh Yadav
Spain
August 2020


offguardian--2020-08-29--HBO’s ‘Welcome to Chechnya’ is latest anti-Russian Cold War propaganda

In 2017 , explosive allegations first emerged that the authorities of the Chechen Republic were reportedly interning gay men in concentration camps .
After a three year period of dormancy , the accusations have resurfaced in a new feature-length documentary by HBO Films entitled Welcome to Chechnya .
Shot between mid-2017 and early last year , the film has received widespread acclaim among Western media and film critics .
Shortly after its release last month , the Trump administration and US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced an increase in economic sanctions and imposed travel restrictions against Chechen leader Ramzan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ putative human rights abuses in the southern Russian republic covered in the film .
Most of the boilerplate reviews of Welcome to Chechnya have heaped particular praise upon the documentary ’ s novelty use of ‘ deepfake ’ technology to hide the identities of alleged victims in the cinematic investigation .
Yet at the closing of the film , one subject who previously appears with his likeness concealed by AI reveals himself at a news conference without the disguise — rendering the prior use of synthetic media fruitless .
Maxim Lapunov , who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Russian native of Siberia , is still the only individual to have gone public with the charges .
Despite the obvious credibility and authenticity questions regarding the use of such controversial technology , it has not prevented critics from lauding it unquestioningly .
Unfortunately , even some in alternative media have been regurgitating the film ’ s propaganda such as The Intercept , a slick online news publication owned by billionaire eBay founder Pierre Omidyar whose financial ties to the national security state and U.S. soft power institutions conflict with the outlet ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Intercept ’ s glowing review of Welcome to Chechnya was written by Mehdi Hasan , a journalist who also works for Al-Jazeera , a news agency owned by the ruling emirs of Qatar , a theocratic dictatorship where homosexuality is actually illegal .
The documentarians follow the work of a purported network of activists who evacuate individuals like Lapunov out of the Caucasian republic .
This is the film ’ s primary source of drama , despite their encountering seemingly no difficulty from the local authorities in doing so .
We are then @ @ @ @ @ @ @ apparent hate crimes and human rights abuses going on , but at no point does the film crew even visit the Argun prison where the anti-gay pogroms are alleged to have taken place .
In 2017 , the imperial hipsters at Vice news were given unrestricted access to the facility where nothing was found and the warden adamantly denied the allegations — but not without expressing his own disapproval of homosexuality which was assumed by his interrogators to be evidence of the detentions having occurred .
In the HBO documentary , a similar @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , whose uncomfortable denial of the existence of homosexuality in the deeply conservative and predominantly Muslim republic is implied to be proof that the purges must be happening .
One may recall this same sort of smear tactic was previously done to former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad .
However , Kadyrov and the warden ’ s predictable responses to the subject serve only as confirmation bias , not confirmation .
The selective outrage in response to the alleged purges , like all things Russia-related , is highly politicized .
Western viewers would have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worldwide where homosexuality is still criminalized , Russia isn ’ t among them .
In more than a dozen of those nations , same-sex activity is punishable by death , a few of which happen to be close strategic allies of the United States , including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates .
As recently as 2017 , the US was one of 13 countries to vote against a United Nations Human Rights Council resolution condemning countries with capital punishment for same-sex relations to avoid falling-out with those allies , most of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ respective interpretations of Sharia law .
While the local authorities of the Muslim-majority Chechen Republic have been allowed to introduce some elements of the fundamentalist religious code by the Russian government such as the banning of alcohol and gambling and requiring the wearing of hijab by women , as a federal subject it is still ultimately beholden to Russia ’ s secular constitution .
In fact , it was Kadyrov ’ s predecessor , Alu Alkhanov , who hoped to govern Chechnya with Sharia law , not the current administration .
Credulous audiences @ @ @ @ @ @ @ represents the more moderate wing of Chechen politics because there is absolutely no history or context provided , a deliberately misleading choice on the part of the filmmakers .
The absence of any historical background deceptively suggests that the anti-gay sentiment in the mostly Muslim North Caucasus is somehow an extension of the homophobia in Russia itself , despite the autonomous differences in religion , culture , and society .
In the last decade , the weaponization of identity politics has been central to Washington ’ s ongoing demonization of Russia and its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ issue of LGBT rights particularly given significant attention .
While homosexuality is decriminalized , there is admittedly no legal prohibition of discrimination against the LGBT community in Russia .
In particular , human rights groups have condemned the notorious federal law passed in 2013 known as the ‘ gay propaganda law ’ that forbids the distribution of information promoting “ non-traditional sexual relations ” to minors , which entails the banning of gay pride parades and other LGBT rights demonstrations .
However , the measure enjoys widespread support among the Russian people whose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Orthodox Church since the breakup of the Soviet Union .
It is rather ironic and hypocritical that the West has since taken issue with this turn , considering it facilitated that political transformation .
In reality , the reason for the relentless vilification of Putin has absolutely nothing to to do with the exaggerated plight of gays in Russia and a lot more to do with the reversal of policies under his predecessor , Boris Yeltsin .
In the nineties , the mass privatization of the former state-owned enterprises during Russia ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ impoverishment of millions and the rapid rise of the notorious ‘ oligarchs ’ which the West characterized at the time as progression towards democracy .
In the loans-for-shares scheme , a new ruling class of bankers and industrialists accumulated enormous wealth overnight and by the middle of the decade , owned or controlled much of the country ’ s media outlets .
The oligarchs held enormous power and influence over the deeply unpopular Yeltsin , who would surely have lost reelection in 1996 without their backing and the assistance of Western meddling in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ International Monetary Fund ( IMF ) .
While economic disparity and corruption persists today , overall the Russian economy has been rebuilt after its energy assets were re-nationalized and brought back under state control by the Putin administration , resulting in improved living standards and income levels for the last two decades .
By the same measure , the Russian people can hardly be blamed for associating homosexuality with the unbridled neoliberalism , vulture capitalism and draconian austerity imposed on their country by Western capital .
It is also truly paradoxical that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ become synonymous with Putin in the minds of Westerners when many of the most obscenely wealthy oligarchs of the Yeltsin era now live in exile as his most ardent political opponents after they faced prosecution for their financial crimes .
Not coincidentally , the initial reports of the ‘ gay gulags ’ in Chechnya were published in Novaya Gazeta , an anti-Putin newspaper partly owned by former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev , the very man who ushered in the economic liberalization which auctioned off the state assets to oligarchs like co-owner Alexander Lebedev @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that of perestroika ( “ restructuring ” ) , also had destructive consequences for the national question and ethno-regional interests .
Lenin had famously called the Russian Empire a “ prison house of nations ” , in reference to its heterogeneous range of nationalities and ethnic groups .
The dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 especially re-agitated ethno-national conflicts in the Caucasus , a region that had enjoyed several decades of relative harmony and stability under socialism with rights and representation that did not exist in pre-revolutionary Russia .
While Azerbaijan and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many other municipalities remained under federal control of the Russian Federation , as sovereignty did not constitutionally apply because it had never been an independent state .
Not to mention , its oil and gas reserves are essential to Russia ’ s very economic survival .
The jihadism which plagued the Caucasus was an outgrowth of the US-backed ‘ holy war ’ in Afghanistan in the 1980s , the brainchild of Zbigniew Brzezinski , National Security Advisor in the Jimmy Carter administration .
It was the Polish-born Brzezinski who not only authored the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Soviets but the efforts to turn Russia ’ s own large Muslim minority community against them .
This was mostly unsuccessful as the majority of its 20 million Muslims ( 10 % of the population ) are harmoniously integrated into Russian society , but the Atlanticists did fan the flames of a militant secessionist movement in Chechnya that erupted in a violent insurgency and became increasingly Islamist as the conflict dragged on .
For Washington , the hope was that the West could gain access to Caspian oil by encouraging the al-Qaeda-linked separatists @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its domination in the energy-rich region .
The collapse of the USSR already escalated hostilities between the intermingling ethnic communities of the region , but the antagonisms were intensified by CIA soft power cutouts like the Jamestown Foundation fomenting the secessionist insurrection .
As the separatist movement grew increasingly Wahhabist thanks to US-ally Saudi Arabia , its more moderate nationalist faction led by Akhmad Kadyrov eventually defected back to the Russian side .
The elder Kadyrov would pay the price when he was assassinated in a 2004 stadium bombing in Grozny during an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ son becoming one of his successors .
The Kremlin ’ s support for the Kadyrovs should be understood as a compromise which prevented the more radical Islamists from taking power , which apparently Washington would be happier with running the North Caucasus .
What a human rights utopia Chechnya would be as a breakaway Islamic state , under the salafists which during the Chechen wars committed unspeakable acts of terrorism including the taking of hospital patients , theater goers , and even hundreds of schoolchildren as hostages .
One can be certain that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going on in Chechnya now , there definitely would be without the likes of Kadyrov in power .
In the documentary , what the Chechen leader does implicitly acknowledge may be occurring are individual honor killings within families and clans , a social problem common in other Muslim countries such as Pakistan , and certainly not a human rights issue particular to Chechnya .
Many instances of honor killings in the Muslim world have included homosexuality as a motive for the extrajudicial killings by relatives of victims believed to have betrayed the family @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kadyrov himself has overseen the establishment of unprecedented reconciliation commissions to address the issue of honor culture , blood feuds and vendetta codes of Caucasian tribes .
Kadyrov ’ s promotion of reconciliation has made significant progress in reducing such killings which were rampant during the Chechen Wars as family members would often seek to avenge the deaths of loved ones .
Now that the region is in a period of relative stability , peace and economic recovery , with the once devastated city of Grozny now known as the ‘ Dubai of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is suddenly feigning concern over human rights .
The swift end brought to the conflict by Putin was another reason for his becoming a target of Washington who had been counting on the balkanization of southern Russia .
In a pinnacle of imperial projection , the explanation for Putin ’ s rise to power has since been revised by the Atlanticists to his having somehow secretly masterminded the 1999 Moscow apartment bombings while director of the Federal Security Service ( FSB , the KGB ’ s successor ) , as if the neocons @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rumors about the Bush administration and the 9/11 attacks onto the Kremlin .
Except this Machiavellian conspiracy would be a lot more believable if the Chechen wars had not been going on since the early nineties , with much worse terrorist attacks already having been committed by the separatists , such as the taking of thousands of hospital patients as hostages in southern Russia .
Since the end of the Chechen Wars , on the flip side the US has also backed Russian opposition figure and Putin critic Alexei Navalny , a right-wing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ North Caucasus while comparing its Muslim inhabitants to cockroaches .
Despite his anti-immigrant rhetoric and minuscule 2 % support among Russians , Navalny has been depicted as a “ pro-democracy ” and “ anti-corruption ” campaigner in Western media , who have been crying foul over his recent suspected poisoning in Russia and ensuing comatose airlift to Germany .
If only the naive American liberals who read The New York Times and The Washington Post had any idea that Mr. Navalny has far more in common with the dreaded Mr. Trump than Putin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ already experienced blowback for its nurturing of terrorism in the Caucasus in the form of the Boston Marathon bombings , which recently returned to the news when convicted Chechen-American perpetrator Dzokhar Tsarnaev ’ s death sentence was vacated on appeal last month .
In the aftermath of the April 2013 attacks , it was revealed that Tsarnaev ’ s deceased older brother and co-conspirator Tamerlan Tsarnaev had been radicalized attending seminars financed by the Jamestown Foundation while traveling abroad in Tblisi , Georgia , and the brothers ’ uncle Ruslan Tsarni had previously @ @ @ @ @ @ @ US intelligence officer Graham Fuller , Brzezinski ’ s CIA station chief in Kabul , Afghanistan , during the Afghan-Soviet war .
It also came to light that ‘ Uncle Ruslan ’ had previously worked for the CIA-linked United States Agency for International Development ( USAID ) and established a company called the Congress for Chechen International Organizations which funded Islamic militants in the Caucasus .
Despite the astounding ‘ coincidences ’ surrounding the Tsarnaev clan , Uncle Ruslan was never considered a person of interest by the FBI , who had ignored @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tsarnaev ’ s extremism prior to the attacks .
Two years before Putin ’ s election , Zbigniew Brzezinski , the prime mover of the West ‘ s plan to dominate the globe by using Islam to bring down the USSR in delivering the Soviet equivalent of the Vietnam War , wrote in The Grand Chessboard : American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives ( 1997 ) : Those words were written before the return of both Russia and China on the world stage , developments that have thrown a monkey wrench into Washington @ @ @ @ @ @ @ did not anticipate in his blueprint for Western hegemony .
When the US-backed headchoppers in the Syrian war nearly had control of Damascus , just a thousand miles or so from Sochi , the threat of jihadism returning to the Caucasus became very real .
Beginning at the Munich Conference in 2007 , Putin had begun to criticize the monopolistic expansion of NATO on Russia ’ s borders — but after the subsequent overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi where Moscow witnessed Libya transformed into a hotbed of terrorism like post-Saddam Iraq , the prospect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an existential threat that could not be tolerated .
In mainstream media , reality has been inverted where Moscow ’ s self-defense has been portrayed as expansionism , even though the so-called “ annexation ” of Crimea was virtually nonviolent compared to the Nazi junta initiated by Washington in Ukraine and the Russian-speaking people of Donetsk and Luhansk who voted to join Russia did not wish to end up like those massacred in Odessa .
Besides , is the US not currently annexing northeast Syria ?
The Crimean parliament and Syrian government invited @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be said for the US presence in violation of international law .
Those with no respect for the sovereignty of nations in Washington would prefer Americans to see Russia as an adversary .
During the Cold War , the threat was communism , but with capitalism restored in Eastern Europe , it became necessary to manipulate liberals into perceiving Russia as a ultra-conservative regime .
They must also keep Americans from knowing the true history of US-Russia relations — that Russia was the first nation to recognize American independence when Catherine the Great @ @ @ @ @ @ @ indirectly aided the Thirteen Colonies in their victory against the Loyalists and Great Britain .
During the War of Independence , the Russian Empress had maintained relations with the U.S. and rebuffed British requests for military assistance .
The Russian Empire also later helped secure the Union victory during the Civil War , with an Imperial Navy fleet off the shores of the Pacific preventing the Confederates from landing troops on the west coast and deterring intervention by the British and the French .
Then as Allies in WWII , while the U.S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was the Soviets who truly won the war in Europe , a feat the Anglo-Americans are still trying to take credit for to this day .
Unfortunately , despite his promising rhetorical embrace of détente with Moscow that has made him the subject of political persecution , Donald Trump has proven to be every bit as hostile toward Russia as his forerunners .
With the latest actions taken by his state department regarding Chechnya that are right out of the Brzezinski playbook , the idiom that “ the more things change , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ applies to Washington and US-Russia relations .
Max Parry is an independent journalist and geopolitical analyst .
His writing has appeared widely in alternative media .
Max may be reached at [ email protected ]

Max Parry
In 2017, explosive allegations first emerged that the authorities of the Chechen Republic were reportedly interning gay men in concentration camps. After a three year period of dormancy, the accusations have resurfaced in a new feature-length documentary by HBO Films entitled Welcome to Chechnya.
Shot between mid-2017 and early last year, the film has received widespread acclaim among Western media and film critics. Shortly after its release last month, the Trump administration and US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced an increase in economic sanctions and imposed travel restrictions against Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov and his family, citing the putative human rights abuses in the southern Russian republic covered in the film.
Most of the boilerplate reviews of Welcome to Chechnya have heaped particular praise upon the documentary’s novelty use of ‘deepfake’ technology to hide the identities of alleged victims in the cinematic investigation. Yet at the closing of the film, one subject who previously appears with his likeness concealed by AI reveals himself at a news conference without the disguise — rendering the prior use of synthetic media fruitless.
Maxim Lapunov, who is not even ethnically Chechen but a Russian native of Siberia, is still the only individual to have gone public with the charges. Despite the obvious credibility and authenticity questions regarding the use of such controversial technology, it has not prevented critics from lauding it unquestioningly.
Unfortunately, even some in alternative media have been regurgitating the film’s propaganda such as The Intercept, a slick online news publication owned by billionaire eBay founder Pierre Omidyar whose financial ties to the national security state and U.S. soft power institutions conflict with the outlet’s purported mission.
Notably, The Intercept’s glowing review of Welcome to Chechnya was written by Mehdi Hasan, a journalist who also works for Al-Jazeera, a news agency owned by the ruling emirs of Qatar, a theocratic dictatorship where homosexuality is actually illegal.
The documentarians follow the work of a purported network of activists who evacuate individuals like Lapunov out of the Caucasian republic. This is the film’s primary source of drama, despite their encountering seemingly no difficulty from the local authorities in doing so.
We are then subjected to random cell phone clips of apparent hate crimes and human rights abuses going on, but at no point does the film crew even visit the Argun prison where the anti-gay pogroms are alleged to have taken place.
In 2017, the imperial hipsters at Vice news were given unrestricted access to the facility where nothing was found and the warden adamantly denied the allegations — but not without expressing his own disapproval of homosexuality which was assumed by his interrogators to be evidence of the detentions having occurred.
In the HBO documentary, a similar hatchet job is done to Ramzan Kadyrov, whose uncomfortable denial of the existence of homosexuality in the deeply conservative and predominantly Muslim republic is implied to be proof that the purges must be happening.
One may recall this same sort of smear tactic was previously done to former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. However, Kadyrov and the warden’s predictable responses to the subject serve only as confirmation bias, not confirmation.
The selective outrage in response to the alleged purges, like all things Russia-related, is highly politicized. Western viewers would have no idea that of the 74 countries worldwide where homosexuality is still criminalized, Russia isn’t among them.
In more than a dozen of those nations, same-sex activity is punishable by death, a few of which happen to be close strategic allies of the United States, including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
As recently as 2017, the US was one of 13 countries to vote against a United Nations Human Rights Council resolution condemning countries with capital punishment for same-sex relations to avoid falling-out with those allies, most of which have legal systems established on their respective interpretations of Sharia law.
While the local authorities of the Muslim-majority Chechen Republic have been allowed to introduce some elements of the fundamentalist religious code by the Russian government such as the banning of alcohol and gambling and requiring the wearing of hijab by women, as a federal subject it is still ultimately beholden to Russia’s secular constitution.
In fact, it was Kadyrov’s predecessor, Alu Alkhanov, who hoped to govern Chechnya with Sharia law, not the current administration. Credulous audiences would have no clue that Kadyrov actually represents the more moderate wing of Chechen politics because there is absolutely no history or context provided, a deliberately misleading choice on the part of the filmmakers.
The absence of any historical background deceptively suggests that the anti-gay sentiment in the mostly Muslim North Caucasus is somehow an extension of the homophobia in Russia itself, despite the autonomous differences in religion, culture, and society.
In the last decade, the weaponization of identity politics has been central to Washington’s ongoing demonization of Russia and its President, Vladimir Putin, with the issue of LGBT rights particularly given significant attention. While homosexuality is decriminalized, there is admittedly no legal prohibition of discrimination against the LGBT community in Russia.
In particular, human rights groups have condemned the notorious federal law passed in 2013 known as the ‘gay propaganda law’ that forbids the distribution of information promoting “non-traditional sexual relations” to minors, which entails the banning of gay pride parades and other LGBT rights demonstrations.
However, the measure enjoys widespread support among the Russian people whose social conservatism has been resuscitated by the Orthodox Church since the breakup of the Soviet Union. It is rather ironic and hypocritical that the West has since taken issue with this turn, considering it facilitated that political transformation.
In reality, the reason for the relentless vilification of Putin has absolutely nothing to to do with the exaggerated plight of gays in Russia and a lot more to do with the reversal of policies under his predecessor, Boris Yeltsin.
In the nineties, the mass privatization of the former state-owned enterprises during Russia’s conversion to capitalism resulted in the instant impoverishment of millions and the rapid rise of the notorious ‘oligarchs’ which the West characterized at the time as progression towards democracy.
In the loans-for-shares scheme, a new ruling class of bankers and industrialists accumulated enormous wealth overnight and by the middle of the decade, owned or controlled much of the country’s media outlets. The oligarchs held enormous power and influence over the deeply unpopular Yeltsin, who would surely have lost reelection in 1996 without their backing and the assistance of Western meddling in the form of massive loans from the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
While economic disparity and corruption persists today, overall the Russian economy has been rebuilt after its energy assets were re-nationalized and brought back under state control by the Putin administration, resulting in improved living standards and income levels for the last two decades.
By the same measure, the Russian people can hardly be blamed for associating homosexuality with the unbridled neoliberalism, vulture capitalism and draconian austerity imposed on their country by Western capital.
It is also truly paradoxical that the notion of “Russian oligarchs” has become synonymous with Putin in the minds of Westerners when many of the most obscenely wealthy oligarchs of the Yeltsin era now live in exile as his most ardent political opponents after they faced prosecution for their financial crimes.
Not coincidentally, the initial reports of the ‘gay gulags’ in Chechnya were published in Novaya Gazeta, an anti-Putin newspaper partly owned by former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev, the very man who ushered in the economic liberalization which auctioned off the state assets to oligarchs like co-owner Alexander Lebedev.
Gorbachev’s reforms, particularly that of perestroika (“restructuring”), also had destructive consequences for the national question and ethno-regional interests.
Lenin had famously called the Russian Empire a “prison house of nations”, in reference to its heterogeneous range of nationalities and ethnic groups. The dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 especially re-agitated ethno-national conflicts in the Caucasus, a region that had enjoyed several decades of relative harmony and stability under socialism with rights and representation that did not exist in pre-revolutionary Russia.
While Azerbaijan and Georgia were granted independence, Chechnya and many other municipalities remained under federal control of the Russian Federation, as sovereignty did not constitutionally apply because it had never been an independent state. Not to mention, its oil and gas reserves are essential to Russia’s very economic survival.
The jihadism which plagued the Caucasus was an outgrowth of the US-backed ‘holy war’ in Afghanistan in the 1980s, the brainchild of Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor in the Jimmy Carter administration. It was the Polish-born Brzezinski who not only authored the geostrategy of arming the mujahideen against the Soviets but the efforts to turn Russia’s own large Muslim minority community against them.
This was mostly unsuccessful as the majority of its 20 million Muslims (10% of the population) are harmoniously integrated into Russian society, but the Atlanticists did fan the flames of a militant secessionist movement in Chechnya that erupted in a violent insurgency and became increasingly Islamist as the conflict dragged on.
For Washington, the hope was that the West could gain access to Caspian oil by encouraging the al-Qaeda-linked separatists rebranded as “rebels” vulnerable to its domination in the energy-rich region.
The collapse of the USSR already escalated hostilities between the intermingling ethnic communities of the region, but the antagonisms were intensified by CIA soft power cutouts like the Jamestown Foundation fomenting the secessionist insurrection.
As the separatist movement grew increasingly Wahhabist thanks to US-ally Saudi Arabia, its more moderate nationalist faction led by Akhmad Kadyrov eventually defected back to the Russian side. The elder Kadyrov would pay the price when he was assassinated in a 2004 stadium bombing in Grozny during an annual Victory Day celebration, with his son becoming one of his successors.
The Kremlin’s support for the Kadyrovs should be understood as a compromise which prevented the more radical Islamists from taking power, which apparently Washington would be happier with running the North Caucasus.
What a human rights utopia Chechnya would be as a breakaway Islamic state, under the salafists which during the Chechen wars committed unspeakable acts of terrorism including the taking of hospital patients, theater goers, and even hundreds of schoolchildren as hostages.
One can be certain that if there aren’t anti-gay pogroms going on in Chechnya now, there definitely would be without the likes of Kadyrov in power.
In the documentary, what the Chechen leader does implicitly acknowledge may be occurring are individual honor killings within families and clans, a social problem common in other Muslim countries such as Pakistan, and certainly not a human rights issue particular to Chechnya. Many instances of honor killings in the Muslim world have included homosexuality as a motive for the extrajudicial killings by relatives of victims believed to have betrayed the family honor.
On the other hand, Kadyrov himself has overseen the establishment of unprecedented reconciliation commissions to address the issue of honor culture, blood feuds and vendetta codes of Caucasian tribes. Kadyrov’s promotion of reconciliation has made significant progress in reducing such killings which were rampant during the Chechen Wars as family members would often seek to avenge the deaths of loved ones.
Now that the region is in a period of relative stability, peace and economic recovery, with the once devastated city of Grozny now known as the ‘Dubai of the North Caucasus’, the West is suddenly feigning concern over human rights.
The swift end brought to the conflict by Putin was another reason for his becoming a target of Washington who had been counting on the balkanization of southern Russia.
In a pinnacle of imperial projection, the explanation for Putin’s rise to power has since been revised by the Atlanticists to his having somehow secretly masterminded the 1999 Moscow apartment bombings while director of the Federal Security Service (FSB, the KGB’s successor), as if the neocons hope to deflect all of the longstanding rumors about the Bush administration and the 9/11 attacks onto the Kremlin.
Except this Machiavellian conspiracy would be a lot more believable if the Chechen wars had not been going on since the early nineties, with much worse terrorist attacks already having been committed by the separatists, such as the taking of thousands of hospital patients as hostages in southern Russia.
Since the end of the Chechen Wars, on the flip side the US has also backed Russian opposition figure and Putin critic Alexei Navalny, a right-wing Islamophobe who has pledged to secede the North Caucasus while comparing its Muslim inhabitants to cockroaches.
Despite his anti-immigrant rhetoric and minuscule 2% support among Russians, Navalny has been depicted as a “pro-democracy” and “anti-corruption” campaigner in Western media, who have been crying foul over his recent suspected poisoning in Russia and ensuing comatose airlift to Germany.
If only the naive American liberals who read The New York Times and The Washington Post had any idea that Mr. Navalny has far more in common with the dreaded Mr. Trump than Putin does.
Meanwhile, the US has already experienced blowback for its nurturing of terrorism in the Caucasus in the form of the Boston Marathon bombings, which recently returned to the news when convicted Chechen-American perpetrator Dzokhar Tsarnaev’s death sentence was vacated on appeal last month.
In the aftermath of the April 2013 attacks, it was revealed that Tsarnaev’s deceased older brother and co-conspirator Tamerlan Tsarnaev had been radicalized attending seminars financed by the Jamestown Foundation while traveling abroad in Tblisi, Georgia, and the brothers’ uncle Ruslan Tsarni had previously been married to the daughter of high-ranking US intelligence officer Graham Fuller, Brzezinski’s CIA station chief in Kabul, Afghanistan, during the Afghan-Soviet war.
It also came to light that ‘Uncle Ruslan’ had previously worked for the CIA-linked United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and established a company called the Congress for Chechen International Organizations which funded Islamic militants in the Caucasus.
Despite the astounding ‘coincidences’ surrounding the Tsarnaev clan, Uncle Ruslan was never considered a person of interest by the FBI, who had ignored warnings by the Russian FSB of Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s extremism prior to the attacks.
Two years before Putin’s election, Zbigniew Brzezinski, the prime mover of the West‘s plan to dominate the globe by using Islam to bring down the USSR in delivering the Soviet equivalent of the Vietnam War, wrote in The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives (1997):
…The last decade of the twentieth century has witnessed a tectonic shift in world affairs. For the first time ever, a non-Eurasian power has emerged not only as a key arbiter of Eurasian power relations but also as the world’s paramount power. The defeat and collapse of the Soviet Union was the final step in the rapid ascendance of a Western Hemisphere power, the United States, as the sole and, indeed, the first truly global power.”
Those words were written before the return of both Russia and China on the world stage, developments that have thrown a monkey wrench into Washington’s plans which the Russophobic Warsaw-native did not anticipate in his blueprint for Western hegemony.
When the US-backed headchoppers in the Syrian war nearly had control of Damascus, just a thousand miles or so from Sochi, the threat of jihadism returning to the Caucasus became very real.
Beginning at the Munich Conference in 2007, Putin had begun to criticize the monopolistic expansion of NATO on Russia’s borders — but after the subsequent overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi where Moscow witnessed Libya transformed into a hotbed of terrorism like post-Saddam Iraq, the prospect of the same happening in Syria was an existential threat that could not be tolerated.
In mainstream media, reality has been inverted where Moscow’s self-defense has been portrayed as expansionism, even though the so-called “annexation” of Crimea was virtually nonviolent compared to the Nazi junta initiated by Washington in Ukraine and the Russian-speaking people of Donetsk and Luhansk who voted to join Russia did not wish to end up like those massacred in Odessa. Besides, is the US not currently annexing northeast Syria?
The Crimean parliament and Syrian government invited Moscow, while the same cannot be said for the US presence in violation of international law.
Those with no respect for the sovereignty of nations in Washington would prefer Americans to see Russia as an adversary. During the Cold War, the threat was communism, but with capitalism restored in Eastern Europe, it became necessary to manipulate liberals into perceiving Russia as a ultra-conservative regime.
They must also keep Americans from knowing the true history of US-Russia relations — that Russia was the first nation to recognize American independence when Catherine the Great’s neutrality during the Revolutionary War indirectly aided the Thirteen Colonies in their victory against the Loyalists and Great Britain.
During the War of Independence, the Russian Empress had maintained relations with the U.S. and rebuffed British requests for military assistance. The Russian Empire also later helped secure the Union victory during the Civil War, with an Imperial Navy fleet off the shores of the Pacific preventing the Confederates from landing troops on the west coast and deterring intervention by the British and the French.
Then as Allies in WWII, while the U.S. was victorious in the Pacific, it was the Soviets who truly won the war in Europe, a feat the Anglo-Americans are still trying to take credit for to this day.
Unfortunately, despite his promising rhetorical embrace of détente with Moscow that has made him the subject of political persecution, Donald Trump has proven to be every bit as hostile toward Russia as his forerunners. With the latest actions taken by his state department regarding Chechnya that are right out of the Brzezinski playbook, the idiom that “the more things change, the more they stay the same” certainly applies to Washington and US-Russia relations.
Max Parry is an independent journalist and geopolitical analyst. His writing has appeared widely in alternative media. Max may be reached at [email protected]


offguardian--2020-08-29--LIVE: Unite for Freedom Day of Protest

LIVE: Unite for Freedom Day of Protest

The protests against the “ emergency measures ” being taken to “ control the pandemic ” are underway all around the world .
The London protests are especially pressing , considering next month Parliament will vote on extending or ending the “ temporary measures ” put in place to fight the pandemic ( not all of them , of course , because many of them are already permanent ) .
In Berlin ( see livestream above ) : There ’ s already talk of the police shutting the march down due to “ scuffles ” .
UPDATE : The police @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there aren ’ t following the social distancing guidelines .
In fact the narrative is already forming that the protests are all neo-nazi or far-right in nature .
Because apparently there ’ s nothing fascists hate more than a strong state ordering people to follow arbitrary rules under threat : Without any sense of irony , there are counter-protests going on : Does it make sense to have an anti-protests protest , denouncing the danger of protests ?
UPDATE : Amazing view of the crowd in Berlin And live stream of the London @ @ @ @ @ @ @ turns up almost nothing .
They are not on the frontpage of The Guardian or the BBC or any other mainstream outlets , so if you have information , videos or photographs you want to share , post them below .
We ’ ll try to keep the thread up to date .

The protests against the “emergency measures” being taken to “control the pandemic” are underway all around the world.
In Trafalgar Square in London:
Largest UK anti-lockdown protest yet, Trafalgar Square, London pic.twitter.com/xIUG8evAVo — SteveSpCorner (@SteveRightNLeft) August 29, 2020
The London protests are especially pressing, considering next month Parliament will vote on extending or ending the “temporary measures” put in place to fight the pandemic (not all of them, of course, because many of them are already permanent).
In Berlin (see livestream above):
Live video of people gathering in Berlin protesthttps://t.co/UMU9pIlP1H — Tim Hayward (@Tim_Hayward_) August 29, 2020
There’s already talk of the police shutting the march down due to “scuffles”.
UPDATE: The police are stopping the protest because the people there aren’t following the social distancing guidelines.
In fact the narrative is already forming that the protests are all neo-nazi or far-right in nature. Because apparently there’s nothing fascists hate more than a strong state ordering people to follow arbitrary rules under threat:
Protesters gathering for corona skeptic demo in Berlin. Masks are not compulsory, but organisers are responsible for ensuring that demonstrators maintain social distancing. En route we’ve also seen flags and t-shirts belonging to far-right extremist groups #b2908 pic.twitter.com/fUMONczpvT — Kate Brady (@kbrady90) August 29, 2020
Without any sense of irony, there are counter-protests going on:
One of several counter demos against the coronavirus skeptic protest in Berlin. #B2908 "You’re marching alongside Nazis," counter protesters chant. The motto is #AbstandhaltengegenRechts (Keep distance from the far-right) pic.twitter.com/t09eNjYfqy — Kate Brady (@kbrady90) August 29, 2020
Does it make sense to have an anti-protests protest, denouncing the danger of protests?
UPDATE: Amazing view of the crowd in Berlin
Another view of the Berlin anti-mask, anti-lockdown protest. pic.twitter.com/OsyhKkTQlD — Ezra Levant 🍁 (@ezralevant) August 29, 2020
And live stream of the London march via sputnik:
Googling these events turns up almost nothing. They are not on the frontpage of The Guardian or the BBC or any other mainstream outlets, so if you have information, videos or photographs you want to share, post them below. We’ll try to keep the thread up to date.