offguardian--2020-11-14--WEF’s ‘Great Reset’ Plan for Big Food is NOT good news…

The World Economic Forum ’ s ( WEF ) The Great Reset includes a plan to transform the global food and agricultural industries and the human diet .
The architects of the plan claim it will reduce food scarcity , hunger and disease , and even mitigate climate change .
But a closer look at the corporations and think tanks the WEF is partnering with to usher in this global transformation suggests that the real motive is tighter corporate control over the food system by means of technological solutions .
The WEF describes itself as “ the global platform for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ corporations , politicians , intellectuals , scientists and other leaders of society to “ define , discuss and advance key issues on the global agenda.
” According to WEF ’ s founder and executive chairman , Klaus Schwab , the forum is guided by the goal of positioning “ private corporations as the trustees of society ” to “ address social and environmental challenges.
” In July , Schwab published a 195-page book , “ COVID-19 : The Great Reset , ” in which he challenged industry leaders and decision makers to “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not letting the crisis go to waste.
” TIME magazine ( whose owner Marc Benioff is a WEF board member ) recently partnered with the WEF to cover The Great Reset and to provide a “ look at how the COVID-19 pandemic provides a unique opportunity to transform the way we live.
” The Great Reset is meant to be all-encompassing .
Its partner organizations include the biggest players in data collection , telecommunications , weapons manufacturing , finance , pharmaceuticals , biotechnology and the food industry .
The WEF ’ s plans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and agriculture include projects and strategic partnerships that favor genetically modified organisms , lab-made proteins and pharmaceuticals and industrial chemicals as sustainable solutions to food and health issues .
For example , WEF has promoted and partnered with an organization called EAT Forum .
EAT Forum describes itself as a “ Davos for food ” that plans to “ add value to business and industry ” and “ set the political agenda.
” EAT was co-founded by Wellcome Trust , an organization established with funds from GlaxoSmithKline and which still has strategic partnerships @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nearly 40 city governments in Europe , Africa , Asia , North America , South America and Australia .
The organization also assists the United Nations Children ’ s Fund ( UNICEF ) in the “ creation of new dietary guidelines ” and sustainable development initiatives .
According to Frederic Leroy , a food science and biotechnology professor at University of Brussels , EAT network interacts closely with some of the biggest imitation meat companies , including Impossible Foods and other biotech companies , which aim to replace wholesome nutritious foods with genetically @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it as healthy and sustainable , which of course it is neither , ” Leroy told The Defender .
Impossible Foods was initially co-funded by Google , Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates .
Recent lab results showed the company ’ s imitation meat contained glyphosate levels 11 times higher than its closest competitor .
EAT ’ s biggest initiative is called FReSH , which the organization describes as an effort to drive the transformation of the food system .
The project ’ s partners include Bayer , Cargill , Syngenta , Unilever and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like Unilever and Bayer and other pharmaceutical companies are already chemical processors — so many of these companies are very well positioned to profit off of this new food business which revolves around processing chemicals and extracts needed to produce these lab-made foods on a global scale , ” Leroy said .
In Schwab ’ s book , he discusses how biotechnology and genetically modified food should become a central pillar to repairing global food scarcity issues , issues which COVID has revealed and exacerbated .
He writes “ global food security will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ modified foods are adapted to reflect the reality that gene editing offers a precise , efficient and safe method of improving crops.
” Shiva disagrees .
She told The Defender that the “ WEF is parading fake science , ” and “ for Mr. Schwab to promote these technologies as solutions proves that The Great Reset is about maintaining and empowering a corporate extraction machine and the private ownership of life.
” EAT developed what it refers to as “ the planetary health diet , ” which the WEF champions as the “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But according to Leroy , it ’ s a diet that ’ s supposed to replace everything else .
“ The diet aims to cut the meat and dairy intake of the global population by as much as 90 % in some cases and replaces it with lab-made foods , cereals and oil , ” he said .
According to EAT ’ s own reports , the big adjustments the organization and its corporate partners want to make to the food system are “ unlikely to be successful if left up to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wish to impose on societal eating habits and food “ require reframing at the systemic level with hard policy interventions that include laws , fiscal measures , subsidies and penalties , trade reconfiguration and other economic and structural measures.
” But Shiva said this is the wrong approach , because “ all of the science ” shows that diets should be centered around regional and geographical biodiversity .
She explained that : Originally published on The Defender , the newsletter of ChildrensHealthDefense.org

Jeremy Loffredo
The World Economic Forum’s (WEF) The Great Reset includes a plan to transform the global food and agricultural industries and the human diet. The architects of the plan claim it will reduce food scarcity, hunger and disease, and even mitigate climate change.
But a closer look at the corporations and think tanks the WEF is partnering with to usher in this global transformation suggests that the real motive is tighter corporate control over the food system by means of technological solutions.
Vandana Shiva, scholar, environmentalist, food sovereignty advocate and author, told The Defender:
The Great Reset is about multinational corporate stakeholders at the World Economic Forum controlling as many elements of planetary life as they possibly can. From the digital data humans produce to each morsel of food we eat.”
The WEF describes itself as “the global platform for public-private cooperation” that creates partnerships between corporations, politicians, intellectuals, scientists and other leaders of society to “define, discuss and advance key issues on the global agenda.”
According to WEF’s founder and executive chairman, Klaus Schwab, the forum is guided by the goal of positioning “private corporations as the trustees of society” to “address social and environmental challenges.”
In July, Schwab published a 195-page book, “COVID-19: The Great Reset,” in which he challenged industry leaders and decision makers to “make good use of the pandemic by not letting the crisis go to waste.”
TIME magazine (whose owner Marc Benioff is a WEF board member) recently partnered with the WEF to cover The Great Reset and to provide a “look at how the COVID-19 pandemic provides a unique opportunity to transform the way we live.”
The Great Reset is meant to be all-encompassing. Its partner organizations include the biggest players in data collection, telecommunications, weapons manufacturing, finance, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology and the food industry.
The WEF’s plans for the “reset” of food and agriculture include projects and strategic partnerships that favor genetically modified organisms, lab-made proteins and pharmaceuticals and industrial chemicals as sustainable solutions to food and health issues.
For example, WEF has promoted and partnered with an organization called EAT Forum. EAT Forum describes itself as a “Davos for food” that plans to “add value to business and industry” and “set the political agenda.”
EAT was co-founded by Wellcome Trust, an organization established with funds from GlaxoSmithKline and which still has strategic partnerships with the drugmaker. EAT collaborates with nearly 40 city governments in Europe, Africa, Asia, North America, South America and Australia. The organization also assists the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) in the “creation of new dietary guidelines” and sustainable development initiatives.
According to Frederic Leroy, a food science and biotechnology professor at University of Brussels, EAT network interacts closely with some of the biggest imitation meat companies, including Impossible Foods and other biotech companies, which aim to replace wholesome nutritious foods with genetically modified lab creations.
“They frame it as healthy and sustainable, which of course it is neither,” Leroy told The Defender.
Impossible Foods was initially co-funded by Google, Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates. Recent lab results showed the company’s imitation meat contained glyphosate levels 11 times higher than its closest competitor.
EAT’s biggest initiative is called FReSH, which the organization describes as an effort to drive the transformation of the food system. The project’s partners include Bayer, Cargill, Syngenta, Unilever and even tech giant Google.
“Companies like Unilever and Bayer and other pharmaceutical companies are already chemical processors — so many of these companies are very well positioned to profit off of this new food business which revolves around processing chemicals and extracts needed to produce these lab-made foods on a global scale,” Leroy said.
In Schwab’s book, he discusses how biotechnology and genetically modified food should become a central pillar to repairing global food scarcity issues, issues which COVID has revealed and exacerbated.
He writes “global food security will only be achieved if regulations on genetically modified foods are adapted to reflect the reality that gene editing offers a precise, efficient and safe method of improving crops.”
Shiva disagrees. She told The Defender that the “WEF is parading fake science,” and “for Mr. Schwab to promote these technologies as solutions proves that The Great Reset is about maintaining and empowering a corporate extraction machine and the private ownership of life.”
EAT developed what it refers to as “the planetary health diet,” which the WEF champions as the “sustainable dietary solution of the future.” But according to Leroy, it’s a diet that’s supposed to replace everything else. “The diet aims to cut the meat and dairy intake of the global population by as much as 90% in some cases and replaces it with lab-made foods, cereals and oil,” he said.
Shiva further explained:
“EAT’s proposed diet is not about nutrition at all, it’s about big business and it’s about a corporate takeover of the food system.”
According to EAT’s own reports, the big adjustments the organization and its corporate partners want to make to the food system are “unlikely to be successful if left up to the individual,” and the changes they wish to impose on societal eating habits and food “require reframing at the systemic level with hard policy interventions that include laws, fiscal measures, subsidies and penalties, trade reconfiguration and other economic and structural measures.”
But Shiva said this is the wrong approach, because “all of the science” shows that diets should be centered around regional and geographical biodiversity. She explained that:
“EAT’s uniform global diet will be produced with western technology and agricultural chemicals. Forcing this onto sovereign nations by multinational lobbying is what I refer to as food imperialism.”
Originally published on The Defender, the newsletter of ChildrensHealthDefense.org


offguardian--2020-11-15--Everybody Knows the Fight was Fixed

Everybody Knows the Fight was Fixed

At the end of Henrik Ibsen ’ s classic play , A Doll ’ s House , Nora , the aggrieved wife , leaves her husband ’ s house and all the illusions that sustained its marriage of lies .
She chooses freedom over fantasy .
She will no longer be played with like a doll but will try to become a free woman – a singular one .
“ There is another task I must undertake first .
I must try and educate myself , ” she tells her husband Torvald , a man completely incapable of understanding the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s slave .
When Nora closes the doll ’ s house door behind her , the sound is like a hammer blow of freedom .
For anyone who has seen the play , even when knowing the outcome in advance , that sound is profound .
It keeps echoing .
It interrogates one ’ s conscience .
The echo asks : Do you live inside America ’ s doll house where a vast tapestry of lies , bad faith , and cheap grace keep you caged in comfort , as you repeat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you ?
In this doll ’ s house of propaganda into which America has been converted , a great many of our basic assumptions are totally illusory .
Americans who voted for either Trump or Biden in the 2020 election are like Torvald clones .
They refuse to open that door so they might close it behind them .
They live in the doll ’ s house – all 146+ million of them .
Like Torvald , they are comforted .
They are programmed and propagandized , embracing the illusion that the electoral @ @ @ @ @ @ @ make sure no significant change can occur , no matter who is president .
It is a sad reality promoted as democracy .
They will prattle on and give all sorts of reasons why they voted , and for whom , and how if you don ’ t vote you have no right to bitch , and how it ’ s this sacred right to vote that makes democracy great , blah blah blah .
It ’ s all sheer nonsense .
For the U.S.A. is not a democracy ; it is an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wealthy .
This is not a big secret .
Everybody knows this is true ; knows the electoral system is sheer show business with the presidential extravaganza drawing the big money from corporate lobbyists , investment bankers , credit card companies , lawyers , business and hedge fund executives , Silicon Valley honchos , think tanks , Wall Street gamblers , millionaires , billionaires , et .
al .
Biden and Trump spent over 3 billion dollars on the election .
They are owned by the money people .
Both are old men @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quick inquiry will show how the rich have profited immensely from their tenures in office .
There is not one hint that they could change and have a miraculous conversion while in future office , like JFK .
Neither has the guts or the intelligence .
They are nowhere men who fear the fate that John Kennedy faced squarely when he turned against the CIA and the war machine .
They join the craven company of Johnson , Ford , Carter , Reagan G.H.W .
Bush , Clinton , George W. Bush , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ message that was sent from the streets of Dallas in 1963 : You don ’ t want to die , do you ?
Ask yourself : Has the power of the oligarchic , permanent warfare state with its propaganda and spy networks , its vast intelligence apparatus , increased or decreased in the past half century ?
Who is winning the battle , the people or the ruling elites ?
The answer is obvious .
It matters not at all whether the president has been Trump or Bill Clinton , Ronald Reagan or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ George H. W. Bush , Richard Nixon , Gerald Ford , or Jimmy Carter .
The power of the national security state has grown under them all and everyone is left to moan and groan and wonder why .
All the while , the doll ’ s house has become more and more sophisticated and powerful .
It is now essentially an electronic prison that is being “ Built Back Better.
” The new Cold War now being waged against Russia and China is a bi-partisan affair , as is the confidence game @ @ @ @ @ @ @ create a fractured consciousness in the population through their corporate mass-media stenographers .
Trump and his followers on one side of the coin ; liberal Democrats on the other .
Only those backed by the wealthy power brokers get elected in the U.S.A. Then when elected , it ’ s payback time .
Palms are greased .
Everybody knows this is true .
It ’ s called corruption .
So why would anyone , who opposes a corrupt political oligarchy , vote , unless they were casting a vote of conscience for a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who voted for the two men backed by the super-rich owners of the country knew what they were doing , unless they live under a rock and come out every four years to vote .
Perhaps they were out buying stuffing for the Thanksgiving turkey , so they can give thanks for the farce ( stuffing : Latin : farcire ) .
They have their reasons .
Now the Biden people celebrate , just as Trump ’ s supporters did in 2016 .
I can hear fireworks going off as I write here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voted for Biden and hate Trump with a passion more intense than what they ever could work up for a spurned lover or spouse .
This is mass psychosis .
It ’ s almost funny .
At least we have gotten rid of Trump , they say .
No one can be worse .
They think this is logic .
Like Torvald , they can not begin to understand why anyone would want to leave the doll ’ s house , how anyone could refuse to play a game in which the dice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are in the doll ’ s house while knowing the dice are loaded and still roll the die , not caring that their choice – whether it ’ s Tweedledee or Tweedledum – will result in the death and impoverishment of so many , that being the end result of oligarchic rule at home and imperialism abroad .
And while in Nineteen Eighty-Four Doublethink is learned by all the Party members “ and certainly by all who are intelligent as well as orthodox , ” today in the USA , it has been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ To live in the USA is to live in the Church of the Good Hustler .
People often ask : What can we do to make the country better ?
What is your alternative ?
A child could answer that one : Don ’ t vote if you know that both contenders are backed by the super-rich elites , what some call the Deep State .
Which of course they are .
Everybody knows .
The so-called left and right argue constantly about whom to support .
It ’ s a pseudo-debate constructed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ counts ; that the game isn ’ t rigged .
It ’ s hammered into kids ’ heads from an early age .
Be grateful , give thanks that you live in a democracy where voting is allowed and your choice is as important as a billionaire ’ s such as Bill Gates , Jeff Bezos , or Charles Koch .
In the voting booth we are all equal .
Myths die hard .
This one never does : Your voice – our faith – it ’ s time to unite and heal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the Syrians , the Afghanis , the Libyans , the Palestinians , et al .
They sing a different tune , one not heard In the Church of the Good Hustler .
After campaigning hard for the losing presidential candidate in 1972 , I nearly choked when I heard Richard Nixon ’ s inaugural address in January 1973 .
Clinging to the American myth the previous year , I had campaigned for a genuine anti-war Democrat , Senator George McGovern .
The war against Vietnam was still raging and Nixon , who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a “ peace candidate , ” succeeding the previous “ peace candidate ” Lyndon Baines Johnson , was nevertheless overwhelmingly elected , despite Watergate allegations appearing in the months preceding the election .
Nixon won forty-nine states to McGovern ’ s one – Massachusetts , where I lived .
It was a landslide .
I felt sick , woke up , got up , and left the doll ’ s house .
“ Propaganda is the true remedy for loneliness , ” wrote the French sociologist Jacques Ellul in 1965 in Propaganda : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the will to believe and the power of positive thinking are far more powerful than the will to truth .
Unlike Nora , who knew that when she left the doll ’ s house she was choosing the loneliness of the solitary soul , Americans prefer myths that induce them to act out of habit so they can lose themselves in the group .
This is so despite the fact that In the Church of the Good Hustler , when you play the game , you lose .
We are all Americans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ never told a lie .

Edward Curtin
“Yeah, like [in] a church. Church of the Good Hustler.”
Fast Eddie Felson (Paul Newman) in The Hustler
At the end of Henrik Ibsen’s classic play, A Doll’s House, Nora, the aggrieved wife, leaves her husband’s house and all the illusions that sustained its marriage of lies. She chooses freedom over fantasy. She will no longer be played with like a doll but will try to become a free woman – a singular one.
“There is another task I must undertake first. I must try and educate myself,” she tells her husband Torvald, a man completely incapable of understanding the social programming that has made him society’s slave.
When Nora closes the doll’s house door behind her, the sound is like a hammer blow of freedom. For anyone who has seen the play, even when knowing the outcome in advance, that sound is profound. It keeps echoing. It interrogates one’s conscience.
The echo asks: Do you live inside America’s doll house where a vast tapestry of lies, bad faith, and cheap grace keep you caged in comfort, as you repeat the habits that have been drilled into you?
In this doll’s house of propaganda into which America has been converted, a great many of our basic assumptions are totally illusory.
Americans who voted for either Trump or Biden in the 2020 election are like Torvald clones. They refuse to open that door so they might close it behind them.
They live in the doll’s house – all 146+ million of them. Like Torvald, they are comforted. They are programmed and propagandized, embracing the illusion that the electoral system is not structured and controlled to make sure no significant change can occur, no matter who is president. It is a sad reality promoted as democracy.
They will prattle on and give all sorts of reasons why they voted, and for whom, and how if you don’t vote you have no right to bitch, and how it’s this sacred right to vote that makes democracy great, blah blah blah. It’s all sheer nonsense. For the U.S.A. is not a democracy; it is an oligarchy run by the wealthy for the wealthy.
This is not a big secret. Everybody knows this is true; knows the electoral system is sheer show business with the presidential extravaganza drawing the big money from corporate lobbyists, investment bankers, credit card companies, lawyers, business and hedge fund executives, Silicon Valley honchos, think tanks, Wall Street gamblers, millionaires, billionaires, et. al. Biden and Trump spent over 3 billion dollars on the election. They are owned by the money people.
Both are old men with long, shameful histories. A quick inquiry will show how the rich have profited immensely from their tenures in office. There is not one hint that they could change and have a miraculous conversion while in future office, like JFK. Neither has the guts or the intelligence. They are nowhere men who fear the fate that John Kennedy faced squarely when he turned against the CIA and the war machine. They join the craven company of Johnson, Ford, Carter, Reagan G.H.W. Bush, Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama. They all got the message that was sent from the streets of Dallas in 1963: You don’t want to die, do you?
Ask yourself: Has the power of the oligarchic, permanent warfare state with its propaganda and spy networks, its vast intelligence apparatus, increased or decreased in the past half century? Who is winning the battle, the people or the ruling elites? The answer is obvious.
It matters not at all whether the president has been Trump or Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan or George W. Bush, Barack Obama or George H. W. Bush, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, or Jimmy Carter. The power of the national security state has grown under them all and everyone is left to moan and groan and wonder why.
All the while, the doll’s house has become more and more sophisticated and powerful. It is now essentially an electronic prison that is being “Built Back Better.” The new Cold War now being waged against Russia and China is a bi-partisan affair, as is the confidence game played by the secret government intended to create a fractured consciousness in the population through their corporate mass-media stenographers. Trump and his followers on one side of the coin; liberal Democrats on the other.
Only those backed by the wealthy power brokers get elected in the U.S.A. Then when elected, it’s payback time. Palms are greased. Everybody knows this is true. It’s called corruption. So why would anyone, who opposes a corrupt political oligarchy, vote, unless they were casting a vote of conscience for a doomed third-party candidate?
Leonard Cohen told it true with “Everybody Knows”:
Everybody knows that the dice are loaded
Everybody rolls with their fingers crossed
Everybody knows that the war is over
Everybody knows the good guys lost
Everybody knows the fight was fixed
The poor stay poor, the rich get rich
That’s how it goes
Everybody knows
Everybody knows that the boat is leaking
Everybody knows that the captain lied
Everybody got this broken feeling
Like their father or their dog just died
And yet everybody who voted for the two men backed by the super-rich owners of the country knew what they were doing, unless they live under a rock and come out every four years to vote. Perhaps they were out buying stuffing for the Thanksgiving turkey, so they can give thanks for the farce (stuffing: Latin: farcire ).
They have their reasons. Now the Biden people celebrate, just as Trump’s supporters did in 2016. I can hear fireworks going off as I write here in a town where 90% + voted for Biden and hate Trump with a passion more intense than what they ever could work up for a spurned lover or spouse. This is mass psychosis. It’s almost funny.
At least we have gotten rid of Trump, they say. No one can be worse. They think this is logic. Like Torvald, they cannot begin to understand why anyone would want to leave the doll’s house, how anyone could refuse to play a game in which the dice are loaded. They will deny they are in the doll’s house while knowing the dice are loaded and still roll the die, not caring that their choice – whether it’s Tweedledee or Tweedledum – will result in the death and impoverishment of so many, that being the end result of oligarchic rule at home and imperialism abroad.
Orwell called this Doublethink:
Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them…. To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies – all this is indispensably necessary.
And while in Nineteen Eighty-Four Doublethink is learned by all the Party members “and certainly by all who are intelligent as well as orthodox,” today in the USA, it has been mastered even by the so-called unintelligent.
To live in the USA is to live in the Church of the Good Hustler.
People often ask: What can we do to make the country better? What is your alternative?
A child could answer that one: Don’t vote if you know that both contenders are backed by the super-rich elites, what some call the Deep State. Which of course they are. Everybody knows.
The so-called left and right argue constantly about whom to support. It’s a pseudo-debate constructed to allow people to think their vote counts; that the game isn’t rigged. It’s hammered into kids’ heads from an early age. Be grateful, give thanks that you live in a democracy where voting is allowed and your choice is as important as a billionaire’s such as Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, or Charles Koch. In the voting booth we are all equal.
Myths die hard. This one never does:
Your voice, your hopes, and your dreams, will define our American destiny. And your courage and goodness and love will forever guide us along the way.”
Donald Trump, January 20, 2017
With the campaign over, it’s time to put the anger and the harsh rhetoric behind us and come together as a nation. It’s time for America to unite. And to heal.”
Joe Biden, November 7, 2020
Above all else, the time has come for us to renew our faith in ourselves and in America. In recent years, that faith has been challenged.”
Richard Nixon, January 20, 1973
Your voice – our faith – it’s time to unite and heal.
Ask the Vietnamese, the Iraqis, the Syrians, the Afghanis, the Libyans, the Palestinians, et al. They sing a different tune, one not heard In the Church of the Good Hustler.
After campaigning hard for the losing presidential candidate in 1972, I nearly choked when I heard Richard Nixon’s inaugural address in January 1973. Clinging to the American myth the previous year, I had campaigned for a genuine anti-war Democrat, Senator George McGovern.
The war against Vietnam was still raging and Nixon, who had been first elected in 1968 as a “peace candidate,” succeeding the previous “peace candidate” Lyndon Baines Johnson, was nevertheless overwhelmingly elected, despite Watergate allegations appearing in the months preceding the election. Nixon won forty-nine states to McGovern’s one – Massachusetts, where I lived.
It was a landslide. I felt sick, woke up, got up, and left the doll’s house.
“Propaganda is the true remedy for loneliness,” wrote the French sociologist Jacques Ellul in 1965 in Propaganda:
It corresponds to the need to share, to be a member of a community, to lose oneself in a group, to embrace a collective ideology that will end loneliness…. It also corresponds to deep and constant needs, more developed today, perhaps, than ever before: the need to believe and obey, to create and hear fables, to communicate in the language of myths.
In a country where loneliness is widespread, the will to believe and the power of positive thinking are far more powerful than the will to truth. Unlike Nora, who knew that when she left the doll’s house she was choosing the loneliness of the solitary soul, Americans prefer myths that induce them to act out of habit so they can lose themselves in the group.
This is so despite the fact that In the Church of the Good Hustler, when you play the game, you lose. We are all Americans and your vote counts and George Washington never told a lie.


offguardian--2020-11-16--6 Factors Which Point to a Rigged Election

The mainstream media are quick to call the claim “ baseless ” , but there ’ s plenty of evidence for anyone willing to see it .
The US Election is still a burning issue almost two weeks after the people went to the polls , and though the race has been called for Biden by every mainstream media outlet in the world , the recounts are ongoing and irregularities manifest .
Trump ’ s legal team , and many in the alternate media , are claiming the election was rigged .
With one voice the mainstream media – and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claims as “ baseless ” , and scream there is “ no evidence ” .
This is incorrect .
There is plenty of evidence , both circumstantial and direct , which breaks down into six basic categories : • Precedent – It has happened before .
• Motive – Deep State/Military dislike of Trump ’ s policies is widely known .
• Opportunity – The voting system is highly susceptible to fraud .
• Voting Irregularities – Known software “ glitches ” & irregularities in the reporting of the results .
• Cover-up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ situation .
There is plenty of evidence that US elections have been rigged before .
Nobody is talking about it much , but US elections have been rigged before .
Everyone is more than familiar with the 2000 election , which was called for Al Gore before Florida flipped to Bush and swung the election .
The controversy over “ hanging chads ” and misplaced votes was all people talked about for weeks .
One noteworthy “ error ” with electronic voting machines , switched over 10000 votes from Gore to an obscure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ battles , Gore eventually conceded .
Within a year the “ attacks ” of 9/11 had happened , and the US was at war in Afghanistan and planning six more wars within 3 years .
More recently , it was revealed the DNC had gone out of its way to hand Hillary the presidential nomination over Sanders in 2016 .
Then in the 2020 primaries , despite embarrassingly losses in the first few primaries , Biden ’ s presidential campaign had a “ miraculous turnaround ” , thanks largely to irregularities in postal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jersey .
This is evidence of precedent .
The US Deep State has clear and publicly known motives for wanting to remove Trump from office .
It is no secret that many members of the US ’ s political establishment oppose Trump and Trump ’ s policies .
This includes neo-con warmongers and chiefs of the military and intelligence agencies .
“ The Resistance ” , billed as some voice of the progressive alternative , boasted former members of George Bush ’ s cabinet as members .
The most strident opposition to Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the Middle East .
Trump was committed to withdrawing from Syria , in direct opposition to the “ Assad Must Go ” crowd at the Pentagon and State Dept .
Just last week it was revealed that Department of Defense actually lied to Trump about their troop numbers in Syria , claiming to have pulled out almost everyone whilst they actually kept their covert war going .
Conversely , Biden has always been firmly in the establishment camp on Syria , and many warmongers are already predicting that Biden will want to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Syrian people .
The US Deep State has carried out coups all around the world , many of them bloody and violent , in order to maintain Imperial ambitions and keep wars-for-profit going .
They have every motive to want to remove Trump and put Biden in his place .
This is evidence of motive .
Establishment voices have been predicting , and planning for , this exact situation for almost a year .
In January of this year – well before anyone could have predicted the effect the “ pandemic ” would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were Wargaming the outcome of a disputed Presidential election based on postal ballots in Pennsylvania .
In August a group naming themselves the Transition Integrity Project published a document predicting a “ disputed ” election , that the counting would take much longer than usual and that it would not be certain who was President until January .
More generally , the outcome of the election was widely “ predicted ” , with multiple press outlets claiming there would be a “ red mirage ” and a “ blue shift ” .
Meaning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and then suddenly Biden would win at the last minute .
This is evidence of foreknowledge .
There is plenty of evidence that the US voting system is open to potential corruption .
Voting machines , for example , are owned and distributed by private companies .
Many of which have political ties .
An article in the Guardian , of all places , went into great detail about this just last year , when they were suggesting that Trump may have stolen the 2016 election .
Likewise , postal ballots are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ William Barr , the Attorney General , summed it up in a television interview in September , and written reports in 2007 and earlier this year , have gone into great detail about historical cases of postal vote fraud and possibilities of future occurrences .
This is evidence of opportunity .
There are plenty of irregularities in the results which suggest the possibility of something strange going on .
The story of the election by the numbers doesn ’ t really make logical sense .
The turnout is said to be 72 % @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the first over 60 % for over 50 years .
In the process Joe Biden , we are told , shattered Barack Obama ’ s popular vote record by almost 10 million votes .
…got more votes than Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton ?
Meanwhile Donald Trump increased his own popular vote by over 10 million , whilst increasing his vote share in almost every ethnic demographic , as well as with women and LGBT voters .
Making him the first incumbent president to increase his popular vote but still lose in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one since all 50 states were part of the union .
Even if you believe that narrative is possible , there ’ s more than enough evidence of voting irregularities to warrant at least questioning the result and investigating further .
In one Michigan county an error in the software configuration swung thousands of votes from Republican to Democrat and called a Congressional seat for the wrong party .
This error was only spotted because of the historically republican record of the county .
In a more hotly disputed seat , this error @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Another Michigan county reported an error which switched 5,500 votes from Trump to Biden – a swing of 11,000 votes .
The software used in this county is used in 30 other states – including Wisconsin , Georgia , Arizona and Pennsylvania , all of which were decided by less than 1 % of the vote , and any two of which could swing the election to Trump .
In fact Dominion , the company which supplied the questionable voting software , was denied a contract by the state of Texas in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ concerns ” about “ whether [ it ] is safe from fraudulent or unauthorized manipulation ” .
A subsidiary of Dominion was kicked out of the Philippines for being too easy to hack .
This video clip appears to show CNN ’ s coverage switching over 19,000 votes from Trump to Biden in Pennsylvania .
The graphed results of both Michigan and Wisconsin show decidedly odd jumps in Biden ’ s vote .
The counting itself was also deeply suspect , with several states taking almost a week to count the last few @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to count over 90 % of the vote on the first evening .
In Wisconsin the National Guard were brought in to “ transcribe ” damaged ballots , whilst in Pennsylvania they were allowed to count postal votes with “ no clear post mark ” , fairly obviously As Glen Greenwald wrote , the very fact the count was so arduous and complicated raises questions about the outcome .
The media are engaging in lies and censorship .
To state there is “ no evidence ” of election rigging is a lie .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ news outlet , channel and website is singing from the same hymn sheet on this – even Fox News , so often Trump ’ s supposed favourite channel .
Even before the election , as discussed above , all the mainstream media were running articles defending mail-in ballots , and claiming that they are not historically weak to voter fraud .
This is totally untrue , as anyone who cared to research the topic would tell you .
In fact many countries have incredibly rigid controls on postal voting for exactly that reason @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , social media companies and mainstream media outlets censor the President of the United States .
So , why are all the media telling the same lies ?
Why are people being denied a platform ?
This is evidence of a cover-up .
• If , in 2016 , some voting software used in 30 states had flipped 5500 from Hillary to Trump , and later been revealed to be financial tied to the Republican party , would that have been “ just a glitch ” , or evidence of cheating ?
• @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Leave after dumps of suspect postal ballots were permitted into the count by a judge who was a known Brexit supporter , would the media have kept quiet ?
• If , in Russia , the media denied a platform to the opposition to accuse Putin of voter fraud , would that be “ responsible media practice ” , or evidence of bias and censorship ?
We don ’ t know exactly what happened , or how the election was result was controlled , but as of right now the specifics do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is plenty of evidence suggesting something happened , more than enough to warrant asking rational questions and expecting reasonable answers .
Every time the media ignores the evidence , or censors those seeking it , they only display further that there must be some fire behind all of this smoke .

The mainstream media are quick to call the claim “baseless”, but there’s plenty of evidence for anyone willing to see it.
Kit Knightly
The US Election is still a burning issue almost two weeks after the people went to the polls, and though the race has been called for Biden by every mainstream media outlet in the world, the recounts are ongoing and irregularities manifest.
Trump’s legal team, and many in the alternate media, are claiming the election was rigged. With one voice the mainstream media – and the entire political establishment – denounce these claims as “baseless”, and scream there is “no evidence”.
This is incorrect. There is plenty of evidence, both circumstantial and direct, which breaks down into six basic categories:
Precedent – It has happened before. Motive – Deep State/Military dislike of Trump’s policies is widely known. Foreknowledge – Establishment voices predicted this exact situation. Opportunity – The voting system is highly susceptible to fraud. Voting Irregularities – Known software “glitches” & irregularities in the reporting of the results. Cover-up – Dishonesty in the reporting of the situation.
1. Precedent
There is plenty of evidence that US elections have been rigged before.
Nobody is talking about it much, but US elections have been rigged before. Everyone is more than familiar with the 2000 election, which was called for Al Gore before Florida flipped to Bush and swung the election. The controversy over “hanging chads” and misplaced votes was all people talked about for weeks.
One noteworthy “error” with electronic voting machines, switched over 10000 votes from Gore to an obscure third-party candidate.
After weeks of legal battles, Gore eventually conceded. Within a year the “attacks” of 9/11 had happened, and the US was at war in Afghanistan and planning six more wars within 3 years.
More recently, it was revealed the DNC had gone out of its way to hand Hillary the presidential nomination over Sanders in 2016. Then in the 2020 primaries, despite embarrassingly lopsided losses in the first few primaries, Biden’s presidential campaign had a “miraculous turnaround”, thanks largely to irregularities in postal ballots in Ohio, Wisconsin and New Jersey.
This is evidence of precedent.
2. Motive
The US Deep State has clear and publicly known motives for wanting to remove Trump from office.
It is no secret that many members of the US’s political establishment oppose Trump and Trump’s policies. This includes neo-con warmongers and chiefs of the military and intelligence agencies.
“The Resistance”, billed as some voice of the progressive alternative, boasted former members of George Bush’s cabinet as members.
The most strident opposition to Trump was on foreign policy – most specifically in the Middle East. Trump was committed to withdrawing from Syria, in direct opposition to the “Assad Must Go” crowd at the Pentagon and State Dept.
Just last week it was revealed that Department of Defense actually lied to Trump about their troop numbers in Syria, claiming to have pulled out almost everyone whilst they actually kept their covert war going.
Conversely, Biden has always been firmly in the establishment camp on Syria, and many warmongers are already predicting that Biden will want to “restore some dignity” to the Syrian people.
The US Deep State has carried out coups all around the world, many of them bloody and violent, in order to maintain Imperial ambitions and keep wars-for-profit going. They have every motive to want to remove Trump and put Biden in his place.
This is evidence of motive.
3. Foreknowledge
Establishment voices have been predicting, and planning for, this exact situation for almost a year.
In January of this year – well before anyone could have predicted the effect the “pandemic” would have on the world – legal scholars were Wargaming the outcome of a disputed Presidential election based on postal ballots in Pennsylvania.
In August a group naming themselves the Transition Integrity Project published a document predicting a “disputed” election, that the counting would take much longer than usual and that it would not be certain who was President until January.
More generally, the outcome of the election was widely “predicted”, with multiple press outlets claiming there would be a “red mirage” and a “blue shift”. Meaning it would look like Trump would win, and then suddenly Biden would win at the last minute.
This is evidence of foreknowledge.
4. Opportunity
There is plenty of evidence that the US voting system is open to potential corruption.
Voting machines, for example, are owned and distributed by private companies. Many of which have political ties. An article in the Guardian, of all places, went into great detail about this just last year, when they were suggesting that Trump may have stolen the 2016 election.
Likewise, postal ballots are known to be susceptible to fraud. William Barr, the Attorney General, summed it up in a television interview in September, and written reports in 2007 and earlier this year, have gone into great detail about historical cases of postal vote fraud and possibilities of future occurrences.
This is evidence of opportunity.
5. Voting Irregularities
There are plenty of irregularities in the results which suggest the possibility of something strange going on.
The story of the election by the numbers doesn’t really make logical sense. The turnout is said to be 72%, the highest in 120 years, and the first over 60% for over 50 years.
In the process Joe Biden, we are told, shattered Barack Obama’s popular vote record by almost 10 million votes.
Joe Biden?
This Joe Biden?
…got more votes than Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton?
Meanwhile Donald Trump increased his own popular vote by over 10 million, whilst increasing his vote share in almost every ethnic demographic, as well as with women and LGBT voters.
Making him the first incumbent president to increase his popular vote but still lose in over a century, and the only one since all 50 states were part of the union.
Even if you believe that narrative is possible, there’s more than enough evidence of voting irregularities to warrant at least questioning the result and investigating further.
In one Michigan county an error in the software configuration swung thousands of votes from Republican to Democrat and called a Congressional seat for the wrong party.
This error was only spotted because of the historically republican record of the county. In a more hotly disputed seat, this error could potentially never have been picked up.
Another Michigan county reported an error which switched 5,500 votes from Trump to Biden – a swing of 11,000 votes.
The software used in this county is used in 30 other states – including Wisconsin, Georgia, Arizona and Pennsylvania, all of which were decided by less than 1% of the vote, and any two of which could swing the election to Trump.
In fact Dominion, the company which supplied the questionable voting software, was denied a contract by the state of Texas in 2019 when judges found there were “concerns” about “whether [it] is safe from fraudulent or unauthorized manipulation”.
A subsidiary of Dominion was kicked out of the Philippines for being too easy to hack.
This video clip appears to show CNN’s coverage switching over 19,000 votes from Trump to Biden in Pennsylvania.
The graphed results of both Michigan and Wisconsin show decidedly odd jumps in Biden’s vote.
The counting itself was also deeply suspect, with several states taking almost a week to count the last few percent of the vote, whilst managing to count over 90% of the vote on the first evening. In Wisconsin the National Guard were brought in to “transcribe” damaged ballots, whilst in Pennsylvania they were allowed to count postal votes with “no clear post mark”, fairly obviously opening the door for postal ballot fraud.
As Glen Greenwald wrote, the very fact the count was so arduous and complicated raises questions about the outcome.
6. The Cover-Up
The media are engaging in lies and censorship.
To state there is “no evidence” of election rigging is a lie. There is plenty of evidence. Every news outlet, channel and website is singing from the same hymn sheet on this – even Fox News, so often Trump’s supposed favourite channel.
Even before the election, as discussed above, all the mainstream media were running articles defending mail-in ballots, and claiming that they are not historically weak to voter fraud. This is totally untrue, as anyone who cared to research the topic would tell you.
In fact many countries have incredibly rigid controls on postal voting for exactly that reason.
And then, after the election, social media companies and mainstream media outlets censor the President of the United States.
So, why are all the media telling the same lies? Why are people being denied a platform?
This is evidence of a cover-up.
*
Ask yourself:
If, in 2016, some voting software used in 30 states had flipped 5500 from Hillary to Trump, and later been revealed to be financially tied to the Republican party, would that have been “just a glitch”, or evidence of cheating?
If the Brexit referendum had swung violently to Leave after dumps of suspect postal ballots were permitted into the count by a judge who was a known Brexit supporter, would the media have kept quiet?
If, in Russia, the media denied a platform to the opposition to accuse Putin of voter fraud, would that be “responsible media practice”, or evidence of bias and censorship?
We don’t know exactly what happened, or how the election was result was controlled, but as of right now the specifics do not matter.
The point is there is plenty of evidence suggesting something happened, more than enough to warrant asking rational questions and expecting reasonable answers.
Every time the media ignores the evidence, or censors those seeking it, they only display further that there must be some fire behind all of this smoke.


offguardian--2020-11-17--COVID19 – Evidence Of Global Fraud

COVID19 – Evidence Of Global Fraud

COVID 19 , and the subsequent governmental responses , appear to be part of an international conspiracy to commit fraud .
It seems there is no evidence that a virus called SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called COVID 19 .
Sometimes you have to go with your gut .
I am not an expert in genetics and , as ever , stand to be corrected .
However my attention was drawn to some research published by the Spanish medical journal D-Salud-Discovery .
Their advisory board of eminently qualified physicians and scientists lends further credibility to their research .
Their claim is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ used in RT-PCR tests to identify SARS-CoV-2 do not target anything specific .
I followed the search techniques outlined in this English translation of their report and can corroborate the accuracy of their claims about the nucleotide sequences listed in the World Health Organisations protocols .
You can do the same .
D-Salud-Discovery state there are no tests capable of identifying SARS-CoV-2 .
Consequently , all claims about the alleged impact of COVID 19 on population health are groundless .
The entire official COVID 19 narrative is a deception .
Ostensibly , there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of it .
If these claims are accurate we can state that there is no evidence of a pandemic , merely the illusion of one .
We have suffered incalculable loss for no evident reason , other than the ambitions of unscrupulous despots who wish to transform the global economy and our society to suit their purposes .
In doing so this “ parasite class ” have potentially committed countless crimes .
These crimes can and should be investigated and prosecuted in a court of law .
Identification of What Exactly ?
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 ( COronaVIrus Disease 2019 ) .
They declared a global COVID 19 pandemic on March 11th 2019 .
The WHO ’ s claim is that the SARS-CoV-2 virus causes the disease COVID-19 .
They also allege this virus has been clearly identified by researchers in Wuhan .
In the WHO ’ s Novel Coronavirus 2019-nCov Situation Report 1 , they state : These two statements from the WHO clearly suggest the SARS-CoV-2 virus was isolated ( meaning purified for study ) and then genetic sequences were identified from the isolated sample .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ and distributed globally to test for the virus in towns , cities and communities around the world .
According to the WHO and Chinese researchers , these tests will find the virus that causes COVID 19 .
Yet the WHO also state : The Wuhan scientists developed their genetic amplification assays from “ sequence information ” because there was no isolated , purified sample of the so called SARS-CoV-2 virus .
They also showed electron microscope images of the newly discovered virions ( the spiky protein ball containing the viral RNA . )
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ unique .
They look just like other round vesicles , such as endocytic vesicles and exosomes .
Virologists claim that it is not possible to “ isolate ” a virus because they only replicate inside host cells .
They add that Koch ’ s postulates do not apply because they relate to bacteria ( which are living organisms ) .
Instead , virologists observe the virus ’ cytopathogenic effects ( CPE ) , causing cell mutation and degradation , in cell cultures .
When Chinese researchers first sequenced the full SARS-CoV-2 genome they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cells .
Vero E6 are an immortalised monkey cell line and Huh7 are immortalised cancer ( tumorigenic ) cells .
Meaning they have been maintained in vitro ( in petri dish cultures ) for many years .
Central to the official SARS-CoV-2 story is the idea that it is a zoonotic virus , capable of bridging the species gap from animals to humans .
When scientists from the US CDC “ infected ” various cells with the novel virus they noted the following : The CDC did not observe any CPE in human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this alleged virus caused any human illness .
Nor did this supposed human virus show any notable replication in human cells , suggesting human to human infection would be impossible .
Noting this problem , a team of Polish scientists introduced this sequenced “ virus ” to human epithethelium ( airway ) cells .
They observed the effects on these HAE cultures for 5 days .
They noted much greater replication than the CDC scientists but ultimately stated : “ We did not observe any release of the virus from the basolateral side @ @ @ @ @ @ @ did not see any evidence of the supposed virions breaching the cell wall membrane .
Again suggesting this so called virus isn ’ t infectious in human beings .
It is not clear that SARS-CoV-2 is a human virus capable of causing illness .
It may not even physically exist .
Is it nothing more than a concept based upon predictive genetic sequences ?
The Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Centre published the first full SARS-CoV-2 genome ( MN908947.1 ) .
This has been updated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the first genetic sequence describing the alleged COVID 19 etiologic agent ( SARS-CoV-2 ) .
All subsequent claims , tests , treatments , statistics , vaccine development and resultant policies are based upon this sequence .
If the tests for this novel virus don ’ t identify anything capable of causing illness in human beings , the whole COVID 19 narrative is nothing but a charade .
The WUHAN researchers stated that they had effectively pieced the SARS-CoV-2 genetic sequence together by matching fragments found in samples with other , previously discovered , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they found an 87.1 % match with SARS coronavirus ( SARS-Cov ) .
They used de novo assembly and targeted PCR and found 29,891-base-pair which shared a 79.6 % sequence match to SARS-CoV .
They had to use de novo assembly because they had no priori knowledge of the correct sequence or order of those fragments .
Quite simply , the WHO ’ s statement that Chinese researchers isolated the virus on the 7th January is false .
The Wuhan team used 40 rounds of RT-qPCR amplification to match fragments of cDNA ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) with the published SARS coronavirus genome ( SARS-CoV ) .
Unfortunately it isn ’ t clear how accurate the original SARS-CoV genome is either .
In 2003 a team of researchers from from Hong Kong studied 50 patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome ( SARS ) .
They took samples from 2 of these patients and developed a culture in fetal monkey liver cells .
They created 30 clones of the genetic material they found .
Unable to find evidence of any other known virus , in just one of these cloned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unknown origin.
” Examining these unknown RNA sequences they found 57 % match to bovine coronavirus and murine hepatitis virus and deduced it was of the family Coronaviridae .
Considering these sequences to suggest a newly discovered SARS-CoV virus ( new discoveries being ambrosia for scientists ) , they designed RT-PCR primers to test for this novel virus .
The researchers stated : Half of the tested patients , who all had the same symptoms , tested positive for this new alleged virus .
No one knows why the other half tested negative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ question wasn ’ t asked .
This supposed virus had just a 57 % sequence match to allegedly known coronavirus .
The other 43 % was just “ there.
” Sequenced data was produced and recorded as a new genome as GenBank Accession No .
AY274119 .
The Wuhan researchers subsequently found an 79.6 % sequence match to AY274119 and therefore called it a novel strain of SARS-CoV ( 2019-nCoV – eventually renamed SARS-CoV-2 ) .
No one , at any stage of this process , had produced any isolated , purified sample @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were percentage sequence matches to other percentage sequence matches .
Scientists are very annoyed because they keep saying the virus has been isolated but no one believes them .
This is because , as yet , no one has provided a single purified sample of the SARS-CoV-2 virus .
What we have instead is a completed genome and , as we are about to discover , it isn ’ t particularly convincing .
Investigative journalists Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter asked some of the scientists who said they had images of SARS-C0V-2 virions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ isolated , purified , virus .
None of them could .
In Australia scientists from the Doherty Institute , announced that they had isolated the SARS-CoV-2 virus .
When asked to clarify the scientists said : This explains why the Australian government state : In The UK , in July , a group of concerned academics wrote a letter to the UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson in which they asked him to : To date they have not received a reply .
Similarly , UK researcher Andrew Johnson made a Freedom of Information @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) .
He asked them to provide him with their records describing the isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus .
To which they responded : Canadian researcher Christine Massey made a similar freedom of information request , asking the Canadian government the same .
To which the Canadian government replied : In the U.S. the Centre For Disease Control ( CDC ) RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel state : Last updated on 13th July 2020 , the CDC are yet to obtain any pure viral sample from any patient said to have the disease of COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t necessarily show if SARS-CoV-2 is either present or causes COVID 19 .
We are told that none of this matters .
That we are ignorant and just don ’ t understand virology .
Therefore , we must except pictures of things we know could be something else and genetic sequences ( which could be anything else ) as conclusive proof that this virus , and the disease it is supposed to cause , are real .
The WHO , and every government , think tank , policy steering committee , government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who promote the official COVID 19 narrative , assert that SARS-CoV-2 causes COVID 19 .
While no one has ever produced a sample of this supposed virus , the alleged SARS-CoV-2 genome has been published .
It is in the public domain .
Key genetic sequences , in the SARS-CoV-2 genome , are said to have specific functions .
These are the target proteins that scientists test for to identify the presence of the “ virus ” .
These include : • RNA-polymerase ( Rd-Rp ) gene – This enables the SARS-CoV-2 RNA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 19 diseased epithelial cells .
• S gene ( Orf2 ) – this glycoprotein forms the spike on the SARS-CoV-2 virion surface which supposedly facilitates SARS-CoV-2 binding to the ACE2 receptors on cells , allowing the RNA inside the virion protein shell ( capsid ) to pass into the now infected cell .
• N gene ( Orf9a ) – the nucleocapsid gene which binds the RNA in capsid formation The WHO maintain a publicly available record of the RT-PCR primers and probes used to test for SARS-CoV-2 .
The primers are specific @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the antisense and sense strands of the synthesised cDNA ( called forward and reverse primers respectively . )
The cDNA strands separate when heated and reform when cooled .
Prior to cooling , nucleotide sequences called probes are introduced to anneal to specific target regions of the suspected viral genome .
During amplification , as the regions between primers elongate , when a primer strikes a probe , the probe decays releasing a fluorescent or dye which can then be read by researchers .
It is the identification of these markers which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ SARS-CoV-2 in a sample .
Something else which is publicly available is the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool ( BLAST ) .
This allows anyone to compare published nucleotide sequences with all those stored by the U.S. National Institutes of Health ( NIH ) genetic database called GenBank .
Therefore we can BLAST the claimed SARS-CoV-2 primers , probes and target gene sequences .
The WHO ’ s forward , reverse primers and probe protocols , for the alleged SARS-CoV-2 viral genome , are based upon RdRp , Orf1 , N and E @ @ @ @ @ @ @ through BLAST to see what we find .
The vital RdRP nucleotide sequence , used as a forward primer is – ATGAGCTTAGTCCTGTTG .
If we run a nucleotide BLAST this is recorded as a complete SARS-CoV-2 isolate with a 100 % matched sequence identity .
Similarly the reverse E gene primer sequence – ATATTGCAGCAGTACGCACACA – reveals the presence of the Orf1ab sequence which also identifies SARS-CoV-2 .
However , BLAST also enables us to search the nucleotide sequences of the microbial and human genomes .
If we search for the RdRp SARS-CoV-2 sequence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 100 % sequence identity match .
The Orf1ab ( E gene ) returns 90 with a 100 % sequence identity match to human chromosomes .
Doing the same for these sequences with a microbial search finds 92 microbes with a 100 % match to the SARS-CoV-2 E gene and 100 matched microbes , with a 100 % sequence identity , to the vital SARS-CoV-2 RdRp gene .
Whenever we check the so-called unique genetic markers for SARS-CoV-2 , recorded in the WHO protocols , we find complete or high percentage matches with various @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suggests that the genetic sequences , which are supposed to identify SARS-CoV-2 , are not unique .
They could be anything from microbial sequences to fragments of human chromosomes .
So called fact checkers , like Reuters ’ Health Feedback project , have been quick to dismiss the claims of those who have noticed the apparent lack of specificity in the supposed SARS-CoV-2 genome .
Using a slew of strawman arguments like , “ this claim suggests every test should be positive , ” ( which it doesn ’ t ) their debunking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seems to deliberately misrepresent the significance of these findings by forwarding an argument that no one , other than the fact checkers themselves , are making .
BLAST searches show that these target sequences are not unique to SARS-CoV-2 .
Nor do all targets need to be found for a result to be deemed positive .
Moroccan researchers investigated the epidemiology of Moroccan alleged cases of SARS-CoV-2 .
Nine percent were positive for three genes , eighteen percent were positive for two genes and seventy three percent for just one .
As we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been positive for none .
This is entirely in keeping with WHO ’ s test guidelines .
They state : “ An optimal diagnosis consists of a NAAT [ nucleic acid amplification test ] with at least two genome-independent targets of the SARS-CoV-2 ; however , in areas where transmission is widespread , a simple single-target algorithm can be used……One or more negative results do not necessarily rule out the SARS-CoV-2 infection.
” Regardless of the spurious arguments of well funded fact checkers , if the forward and reverse primers identify junk , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chromosome and the other a microbial sequence , then the amplified region between them is probably junk too .
The argument that RT-PCR only finds RNA is specious .
Natural transcription ( the separation of DNA strands ) occurs during gene expression .
No one is saying whole chromosomes or microbes are sequenced in the alleged SARS-CoV-2 genome .
Though they may , for all we know .
They are saying the alleged markers , used to test for this supposed virus , are not fit for purpose .
RT-PCR tests do not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for incidents of specific probe florescence to indicate the presence of sequences said to exist .
These sequences are defined by MN908947.1 and the subsequent updates .
These primers and probes could reveal nothing but RNA matches extracted from non-coding , sometimes called “ junk , ” DNA ( cDNA . )
For example the SARS-CoV-2 S gene is meant to be highly specific to the SARS-CoV-2 virus genome .
The target sequence is – TTGGCAAAATTCAAGACTCACTTTC .
A microbial BLAST search returns 97 microbial matches with 100 % identity sequence match .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ top 100 , is 95 % .
A human genome BLAST also finds a 100 % sequence match to 86 human chromosome fragments .
No matter where you look in the supposed genome of SARS-CoV-2 , there is nothing in the WHO ’ s test protocols that clearly identifies what it is .
The whole genome could be false .
The tests do not prove the existence of SARS-CoV-2 .
All they reveal is a soup of unspecified genetic material .
If so , as there are no isolates or purified samples of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , there is no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 exists .
Therefore , nor is there any evidence that a disease called COVID 19 exists .
This infers that there is no scientific basis for any claims about COVID 19 case numbers , hospital admissions or mortality figures .
All measures taken to combat this deadly virus are quite possibly founded upon nothing .
Fraud is a criminal act .
The legal definition of fraud is : “ Some deceitful practice or willful device , resorted to with intent to deprive another of his right @ @ @ @ @ @ @ him an injury.
” The Legal definition of a conspiracy is : “ A combination or confederacy between two or more persons formed for the purpose of committing , by their joint efforts , some unlawful or criminal act ” It seems , those who claim we face a pandemic have not provided any evidence to show that a virus called SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called COVID 19 .
All of the information strongly suggesting this possibility is readily available in the public domain .
Anyone can read it .
For there to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wilful .
The intention must be to deliberately deprive others of their rights or injure them in some other way .
If there is evidence of collusion between individuals ad/or organisations to commit fraud , then this is a conspiracy ( in Common Law jurisdictions ) or a Joint Criminal Enterprise ( JCE ) under International Law .
It seems COVID 19 has been deliberately used as a casus belli to wage war on humanity .
We have been imprisoned in our own homes , our freedom to roam restricted , freedom of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ protest curtailed , separated from loved ones , our businesses destroyed , psychologically bombarded , muzzled and terrorised .
Worse still , while there is no evidence of unprecedented all cause mortality , there were unseasonable spikes in deaths .
These correlate precisely with Lockdown measures which saw the withdrawal of the health services we pay for and a reorientation of public health services to treat one alleged disease at the exclusion of all others .
Further , it is proposed by those who have forwarded the COVID 19 story , that this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ restructuring of the global economy , our political systems , societies , cultures and humanity itself .
To be allowed to participate in their so called “ new normal , ” which is the wholesale transformation of our entire society without our consent , they insist we submit to their conditions .
These include , but aren ’ t limited to , bio-metric surveillance of everyone , the centralised control and monitoring of all of our transactions , oppressive business and social restrictions and an effective demand that we have no right to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ constitutes the condition of slavery .
There is no doubt that we have been deprived of our rights and injured .
In Common Law jurisdictions innocence is presumed , but the evidence that harm has been deliberately caused by an international conspiracy is overwhelming .
Destructive policies , enacted by governments across the world , clearly originated among globalist think tanks and supranational institutions long before the emergence of this non existent pandemic .
In Napoleonic Code jurisdictions , guilt is presumed .
In order for the accused conspirators to prove their innocent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ immeasurable resources , they have collectively been unable to access or understand any of the freely available evidence suggesting COVID 19 is a myth .
Those responsible for the crime of conspiracy to commit global fraud should be tried .
If found guilty they should be imprisoned while the rest of us get on with trying to repair the damage they have already inflicted .

Iain Davis
COVID 19, and the subsequent governmental responses, appear to be part of an international conspiracy to commit fraud. It seems there is no evidence that a virus called SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called COVID 19.
Sometimes you have to go with your gut. I am not an expert in genetics and, as ever, stand to be corrected. However my attention was drawn to some research published by the Spanish medical journal D-Salud-Discovery. Their advisory board of eminently qualified physicians and scientists lends further credibility to their research. Their claim is astounding.
The genetic primers and probes used in RT-PCR tests to identify SARS-CoV-2 do not target anything specific. I followed the search techniques outlined in this English translation of their report and can corroborate the accuracy of their claims about the nucleotide sequences listed in the World Health Organisations protocols. You can do the same.
D-Salud-Discovery state there are no tests capable of identifying SARS-CoV-2. Consequently, all claims about the alleged impact of COVID 19 on population health are groundless.
The entire official COVID 19 narrative is a deception. Ostensibly, there is no scientific foundation for any part of it.
If these claims are accurate we can state that there is no evidence of a pandemic, merely the illusion of one. We have suffered incalculable loss for no evident reason, other than the ambitions of unscrupulous despots who wish to transform the global economy and our society to suit their purposes.
In doing so this “parasite class” have potentially committed countless crimes. These crimes can and should be investigated and prosecuted in a court of law.
Identification of What Exactly?
The World Health Organisation (WHO) classified COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease 2019). They declared a global COVID 19 pandemic on March 11th 2019.
The WHO’s Laboratory testing guidance states:
The etiologic agent [causation for the disease] responsible for the cluster of pneumonia cases in Wuhan has been identified as a novel betacoronavirus, (in the same family as SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV) via next generation sequencing (NGS) from cultured virus or directly from samples received from several pneumonia patients.”
The WHO’s claim is that the SARS-CoV-2 virus causes the disease COVID-19. They also allege this virus has been clearly identified by researchers in Wuhan.
In the WHO’s Novel Coronavirus 2019-nCov Situation Report 1, they state:
The Chinese authorities identified a new type of coronavirus, which was isolated on 7 January 2020……On 12 January 2020, China shared the genetic sequence of the novel coronavirus for countries to use in developing specific diagnostic kits.”
These two statements from the WHO clearly suggest the SARS-CoV-2 virus was isolated (meaning purified for study) and then genetic sequences were identified from the isolated sample. From this, diagnostic kits were developed and distributed globally to test for the virus in towns, cities and communities around the world. According to the WHO and Chinese researchers, these tests will find the virus that causes COVID 19.
Yet the WHO also state:
Working directly from sequence information, the team developed a series of genetic amplification (PCR) assays used by laboratories.”
The Wuhan scientists developed their genetic amplification assays from “sequence information” because there was no isolated, purified sample of the so called SARS-CoV-2 virus. They also showed electron microscope images of the newly discovered virions (the spiky protein ball containing the viral RNA.)
However, such protein structures are not unique. They look just like other round vesicles, such as endocytic vesicles and exosomes.
Virologists claim that it is not possible to “isolate” a virus because they only replicate inside host cells. They add that Koch’s postulates do not apply because they relate to bacteria (which are living organisms). Instead, virologists observe the virus’ cytopathogenic effects (CPE), causing cell mutation and degradation, in cell cultures.
When Chinese researchers first sequenced the full SARS-CoV-2 genome they observed CPE in Vero E6 and Huh7 cells. Vero E6 are an immortalised monkey cell line and Huh7 are immortalised cancer (tumorigenic) cells. Meaning they have been maintained in vitro (in petri dish cultures) for many years.
Central to the official SARS-CoV-2 story is the idea that it is a zoonotic virus, capable of bridging the species gap from animals to humans. When scientists from the US CDC “infected” various cells with the novel virus they noted the following:
We examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549) [lung celles], human liver cells (HUH7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T), in addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 [monkey cells]…No cytopathic effect was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero cells [monkey cells]…HUH7.0 and 293T cells showed only modest viral replication and A549 cells [human lung tissue cells] were incompatible with SARS-CoV-2 infection.”
The CDC did not observe any CPE in human cells. They saw no evidence that this alleged virus caused any human illness. Nor did this supposed human virus show any notable replication in human cells, suggesting human to human infection would be impossible.
Noting this problem, a team of Polish scientists introduced this sequenced “virus” to human epithethelium (airway) cells. They observed the effects on these HAE cultures for 5 days. They noted much greater replication than the CDC scientists but ultimately stated:
“We did not observe any release of the virus from the basolateral side of the HAE culture.”
Meaning they did not see any evidence of the supposed virions breaching the cell wall membrane. Again suggesting this so called virus isn’t infectious in human beings.
It is not clear that SARS-CoV-2 is a human virus capable of causing illness. It may not even physically exist. Is it nothing more than a concept based upon predictive genetic sequences?
Voyage Of Discovery
The Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Centre published the first full SARS-CoV-2 genome (MN908947.1 ). This has been updated many times. However, MN908947.1 was the first genetic sequence describing the alleged COVID 19 etiologic agent (SARS-CoV-2).
All subsequent claims, tests, treatments, statistics, vaccine development and resultant policies are based upon this sequence. If the tests for this novel virus don’t identify anything capable of causing illness in human beings, the whole COVID 19 narrative is nothing but a charade.
The WUHAN researchers stated that they had effectively pieced the SARS-CoV-2 genetic sequence together by matching fragments found in samples with other, previously discovered, genetic sequences. From the gathered material they found an 87.1% match with SARS coronavirus (SARS-Cov). They used de novo assembly and targeted PCR and found 29,891-base-pair which shared a 79.6% sequence match to SARS-CoV.
They had to use de novo assembly because they had no priori knowledge of the correct sequence or order of those fragments. Quite simply, the WHO’s statement that Chinese researchers isolated the virus on the 7th January is false.
The Wuhan team used 40 rounds of RT-qPCR amplification to match fragments of cDNA (complimentary DNA constructed from sampled RNA fragments) with the published SARS coronavirus genome (SARS-CoV). Unfortunately it isn’t clear how accurate the original SARS-CoV genome is either.
In 2003 a team of researchers from from Hong Kong studied 50 patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). They took samples from 2 of these patients and developed a culture in fetal monkey liver cells.
They created 30 clones of the genetic material they found. Unable to find evidence of any other known virus, in just one of these cloned samples they found genetic sequences of “unknown origin.”
Examining these unknown RNA sequences they found 57% match to bovine coronavirus and murine hepatitis virus and deduced it was of the family Coronaviridae. Considering these sequences to suggest a newly discovered SARS-CoV virus (new discoveries being ambrosia for scientists), they designed RT-PCR primers to test for this novel virus. The researchers stated:
Primers for detecting the new virus were designed for RT-PCR detection of this human pneumonia-associated coronavirus genome in clinical samples. Of the 44 nasopharyngeal samples available from the 50 SARS patients, 22 had evidence of human pneumonia-associated coronavirus RNA.”
Half of the tested patients, who all had the same symptoms, tested positive for this new alleged virus. No one knows why the other half tested negative for this novel SARS-CoV virus. The question wasn’t asked.
This supposed virus had just a 57% sequence match to allegedly known coronavirus. The other 43% was just “there.” Sequenced data was produced and recorded as a new genome as GenBank Accession No. AY274119.
The Wuhan researchers subsequently found an 79.6% sequence match to AY274119 and therefore called it a novel strain of SARS-CoV (2019-nCoV – eventually renamed SARS-CoV-2). No one, at any stage of this process, had produced any isolated, purified sample of any virus. All they had were percentage sequence matches to other percentage sequence matches.
Isolate Nothing
Scientists are very annoyed because they keep saying the virus has been isolated but no one believes them. This is because, as yet, no one has provided a single purified sample of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. What we have instead is a completed genome and, as we are about to discover, it isn’t particularly convincing.
Investigative journalists Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter asked some of the scientists who said they had images of SARS-C0V-2 virions to confirm these were images of an isolated, purified, virus. None of them could.
In Australia scientists from the Doherty Institute, announced that they had isolated the SARS-CoV-2 virus. When asked to clarify the scientists said:
“We have short (RNA) sequences from the diagnostic test that can be used in the diagnostic tests”
This explains why the Australian government state:
The reliability of COVID-19 tests is uncertain due to the limited evidence base…There is limited evidence available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available COVID-19 tests.”
In The UK, in July, a group of concerned academics wrote a letter to the UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson in which they asked him to:
Produce independently peer reviewed scientific evidence proving that the Covid-19 virus has been isolated.”
To date they have not received a reply.
Similarly, UK researcher Andrew Johnson made a Freedom of Information Request to Public Health England (PHE). He asked them to provide him with their records describing the isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus. To which they responded:
PHE can confirm it does not hold information in the way suggested by your request.”
Canadian researcher Christine Massey made a similar freedom of information request, asking the Canadian government the same. To which the Canadian government replied:
Having completed a thorough search, we regret to inform you that we were unable to locate any records responsive to your request.”
In the U.S. the Centre For Disease Control (CDC) RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel state:
…No quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available……..Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.”
Last updated on 13th July 2020, the CDC are yet to obtain any pure viral sample from any patient said to have the disease of COVID-19. They openly admit their tests don’t necessarily show if SARS-CoV-2 is either present or causes COVID 19.
We are told that none of this matters. That we are ignorant and just don’t understand virology. Therefore, we must accept pictures of things we know could be something else and genetic sequences (which could be anything else) as conclusive proof that this virus, and the disease it is supposed to cause, are real.
Testing For Nothing
The WHO, and every government, think tank, policy steering committee, government scientific advisor, supranational institutions and others who promote the official COVID 19 narrative, assert that SARS-CoV-2 causes COVID 19.
While no one has ever produced a sample of this supposed virus, the alleged SARS-CoV-2 genome has been published. It is in the public domain.
Key genetic sequences, in the SARS-CoV-2 genome, are said to have specific functions. These are the target proteins that scientists test for to identify the presence of the “virus”. These include:
RNA-polymerase (Rd-Rp) gene – This enables the SARS-CoV-2 RNA to replicate inside the cytoplasm of COVID 19 diseased epithelial cells.
S gene (Orf2) – this glycoprotein forms the spike on the SARS-CoV-2 virion surface which supposedly facilitates SARS-CoV-2 binding to the ACE2 receptors on cells, allowing the RNA inside the virion protein shell (capsid) to pass into the now infected cell.
E gene (Orf1ab) – small membrane protein used in viral assembly
N gene (Orf9a) – the nucleocapsid gene which binds the RNA in capsid formation
The WHO maintain a publicly available record of the RT-PCR primers and probes used to test for SARS-CoV-2. The primers are specific nucleotide sequences that bind (anneal) to the antisense and sense strands of the synthesised cDNA (called forward and reverse primers respectively.)
The cDNA strands separate when heated and reform when cooled. Prior to cooling, nucleotide sequences called probes are introduced to anneal to specific target regions of the suspected viral genome. During amplification, as the regions between primers elongate, when a primer strikes a probe, the probe decays releasing a fluorescent or dye which can then be read by researchers.
It is the identification of these markers which scientists claim to prove the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in a sample.
Something else which is publicly available is the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST). This allows anyone to compare published nucleotide sequences with all those stored by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) genetic database called GenBank. Therefore we can BLAST the claimed SARS-CoV-2 primers, probes and target gene sequences.
The WHO’s forward, reverse primers and probe protocols, for the alleged SARS-CoV-2 viral genome, are based upon RdRp, Orf1, N and E gene profiles. Anyone can run them through BLAST to see what we find.
The vital RdRP nucleotide sequence, used as a forward primer is – ATGAGCTTAGTCCTGTTG. If we run a nucleotide BLAST this is recorded as a complete SARS-CoV-2 isolate with a 100% matched sequence identity. Similarly the reverse E gene primer sequence – ATATTGCAGCAGTACGCACACA – reveals the presence of the Orf1ab sequence which also identifies SARS-CoV-2.
However, BLAST also enables us to search the nucleotide sequences of the microbial and human genomes. If we search for the RdRp SARS-CoV-2 sequence it reveals 99 human chromosome with a 100% sequence identity match. The Orf1ab (E gene) returns 90 with a 100% sequence identity match to human chromosomes.
Doing the same for these sequences with a microbial search finds 92 microbes with a 100% match to the SARS-CoV-2 E gene and 100 matched microbes, with a 100% sequence identity, to the vital SARS-CoV-2 RdRp gene.
Whenever we check the so-called unique genetic markers for SARS-CoV-2, recorded in the WHO protocols, we find complete or high percentage matches with various fragments of the human genome. This suggests that the genetic sequences, which are supposed to identify SARS-CoV-2, are not unique. They could be anything from microbial sequences to fragments of human chromosomes.
So called fact checkers, like Reuters’ Health Feedback project, have been quick to dismiss the claims of those who have noticed the apparent lack of specificity in the supposed SARS-CoV-2 genome.
Using a slew of strawman arguments like, “this claim suggests every test should be positive,” (which it doesn’t) their debunking attempt runs something like this:
Primers are designed to bind to specific nucleotide sequences that are unique to the virus. The forward primer may bind to a particular chromosome but the reverse primer doesn’t bind to the same chromosome and so the chromosome is not present in the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Moreover because the forward and perverse primers envelop the sequence to be amplified the cDMA sequence between primers is unique to the virus.
This seems to deliberately misrepresent the significance of these findings by forwarding an argument that no one, other than the fact checkers themselves, are making. BLAST searches show that these target sequences are not unique to SARS-CoV-2. Nor do all targets need to be found for a result to be deemed positive.
Moroccan researchers investigated the epidemiology of Moroccan alleged cases of SARS-CoV-2. Nine percent were positive for three genes, eighteen percent were positive for two genes and seventy three percent for just one. As we have just discussed, many may have been positive for none.
This is entirely in keeping with WHO’s test guidelines. They state:
“An optimal diagnosis consists of a NAAT [nucleic acid amplification test] with at least two genome-independent targets of the SARS-CoV-2; however, in areas where transmission is widespread, a simple single-target algorithm can be used……One or more negative results do not necessarily rule out the SARS-CoV-2 infection.”
Regardless of the spurious arguments of well funded fact checkers, if the forward and reverse primers identify junk, perhaps one being the fragment of a chromosome and the other a microbial sequence, then the amplified region between them is probably junk too.
The argument that RT-PCR only finds RNA is specious. Natural transcription (the separation of DNA strands) occurs during gene expression. No one is saying whole chromosomes or microbes are sequenced in the alleged SARS-CoV-2 genome. Though they may, for all we know. They are saying the alleged markers, used to test for this supposed virus, are not fit for purpose.
RT-PCR tests do not sequence the entire genome. They look for incidents of specific probe florescence to indicate the presence of sequences said to exist. These sequences are defined by MN908947.1 and the subsequent updates. These primers and probes could reveal nothing but RNA matches extracted from non-coding, sometimes called “junk,” DNA (cDNA.)
For example the SARS-CoV-2 S gene is meant to be highly specific to the SARS-CoV-2 virus genome. The target sequence is – TTGGCAAAATTCAAGACTCACTTTC. A microbial BLAST search returns 97 microbial matches with 100% identity sequence match. The lowest identity percentage match, within the top 100, is 95%. A human genome BLAST also finds a 100% sequence match to 86 human chromosome fragments.
No matter where you look in the supposed genome of SARS-CoV-2, there is nothing in the WHO’s test protocols that clearly identifies what it is. The whole genome could be false. The tests do not prove the existence of SARS-CoV-2. All they reveal is a soup of unspecified genetic material.
If so, as there are no isolates or purified samples of the virus, without a viable test, there is no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 exists. Therefore, nor is there any evidence that a disease called COVID 19 exists.
This infers that there is no scientific basis for any claims about COVID 19 case numbers, hospital admissions or mortality figures. All measures taken to combat this deadly virus are quite possibly founded upon nothing.
Conclusive Fraud
Fraud is a criminal act. The legal definition of fraud is:
“Some deceitful practice or willful device, resorted to with intent to deprive another of his right, or in some manner to do him an injury.”
The Legal definition of a conspiracy is:
“A combination or confederacy between two or more persons formed for the purpose of committing, by their joint efforts, some unlawful or criminal act”
It seems, those who claim we face a pandemic have not provided any evidence to show that a virus called SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called COVID 19. All of the information strongly suggesting this possibility is readily available in the public domain. Anyone can read it.
For there to be a fraud the deceit must be wilful. The intention must be to deliberately deprive others of their rights or injure them in some other way. If there is evidence of collusion between individuals ad/or organisations to commit fraud, then this is a conspiracy (in Common Law jurisdictions) or a Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) under International Law.
It seems COVID 19 has been deliberately used as a casus belli to wage war on humanity. We have been imprisoned in our own homes, our freedom to roam restricted, freedom of speech and expression eroded, rights to protest curtailed, separated from loved ones, our businesses destroyed, psychologically bombarded, muzzled and terrorised.
Worse still, while there is no evidence of unprecedented all cause mortality, there were unseasonable spikes in deaths. These correlate precisely with Lockdown measures which saw the withdrawal of the health services we pay for and a reorientation of public health services to treat one alleged disease at the exclusion of all others.
Further, it is proposed by those who have forwarded the COVID 19 story, that this alleged disease provides justification for the complete restructuring of the global economy, our political systems, societies, cultures and humanity itself.
To be allowed to participate in their so called “new normal,” which is the wholesale transformation of our entire society without our consent, they insist we submit to their conditions.
These include, but aren’t limited to, bio-metric surveillance of everyone, the centralised control and monitoring of all of our transactions, oppressive business and social restrictions and an effective demand that we have no right to sovereignty over our own bodies. This constitutes the condition of slavery.
There is no doubt that we have been deprived of our rights and injured. In Common Law jurisdictions innocence is presumed, but the evidence that harm has been deliberately caused by an international conspiracy is overwhelming. Destructive policies, enacted by governments across the world, clearly originated among globalist think tanks and supranational institutions long before the emergence of this non existent pandemic.
In Napoleonic Code jurisdictions, guilt is presumed. In order for the accused conspirators to prove their innocence they must show that, despite their immeasurable resources, they have collectively been unable to access or understand any of the freely available evidence suggesting COVID 19 is a myth.
Those responsible for the crime of conspiracy to commit global fraud should be tried. If found guilty they should be imprisoned while the rest of us get on with trying to repair the damage they have already inflicted.