principiascientificinternational--2020-10-27--18 Reasons to forgo flu vaccinations this year

In response to the inevitable ad campaigns recommending that “ everyone over age 6 months ” needs to go to their local hospital , clinic or pharmacy to get their “ routine ” annual flu shots , I submit below 17 published medical journal articles that have been so ignored and/or censored-out of the mainstream media that most physicians , PAs , nurses , appointment secretaries and , especially , clinic and hospital management are unaware of their existence .
The issue of “ flu shot or not ” is particularly important this year because there was no influenza epidemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ year , which means that there could not have been any influenza virus collected that are always chosen 6 months earlier Down Under for the Northern Hemisphere ’ s next vaccines .
Thus the 3 or 4 strains of influenza viruses chosen , cultured , mass-produced and marketed by Big Pharma corporations this “ flu season ” for the Northern Hemisphere nations are a total crapshoot and highly likely to have no benefit for potential recipients .
Hence the flu shots offered by GlaxoSmithKline , Sequirus , Sanofi Pasteur , Protein Sciences .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Johnson & Johnson , etc ) are likely to be useless at best , dangerous and over-priced at least and any ethical medical entity offering their flu shot this fall must fully inform ALL potential vaccine recipients .
The ethical approach for entities that annually recommend and profit from administering the almost universally ineffective flu shots would be to NOT even offer them this year – with explanations as to why not .
I hope that hospitals , clinics , public health agencies and even pharmacies will do the ethical thing and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ truth about the total absence of accurate scientific information concerning what viruses are included in the flu shot this year .
( Please be aware that the big vaccine/pharmaceutical industries quietly made their obviously blind choices for the now already manufactured and already distributed – and CDC-recommended [ !
! ]
– flu shots . )
Even though Big Pharma , physicians , hospitals , clinics and public health agencies – and now even pharmacies – commonly cause inadvertent harm to pediatric patients because of their blind adherence to the CDC-approved childhood over-vaccination @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sued for damages to their vaccine-damaged patients due to the Reagan era liability protection legislation .
Of course , for ethical healthcare entities such as clinics and hospitals , the absence of the fear of legal liability should not be a factor in making health care decisions , although that is typically of major importance for for-profit pharmaceutical corporations and pharmacies .
The fact that there has been no logic in Big Pharma ’ s choice of influenza viral strains that have been chosen to be included in this year ’ s flu @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 18 reasons to forgo flu shots this year .
The other 17 are below .
17 Published Flu Vaccine Studies that Should Contribute to Vaccine Hesitancy 1 ] Flu Vaccine Recipients Had a 36 % Increased Risk of Being Susceptible to the Corona Virus “ Vaccine-Derived Virus Interference was Significantly Associated with Coronavirus and Human Metapneumovirus Infections ” Influenza vaccination and respiratory virus interference among Department of Defense personnel during the 2017-2018 influenza season .
2 ] Study Shows Vaccinated Children More Likely to Get Sick with Respiratory illness “ Increased Risk of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Inactivated Influenza Vaccine.
” “ Inflammation-Related Effects of Adjuvant Influenza A Vaccination on Platelet Activation and Cardiac Autonomic Function ” The study concluded : Together with an inflammatory reaction , influenza A vaccine induced platelet activation and sympatho-vagal imbalance towards adrenergic predominance .
Significant correlations were found between C-reactive protein ( CRP ) levels and HRV [ heart rate variability ] parameters , suggesting a pathophysiological link between inflammation and cardiac autonomic regulation .
The vaccine-related platelet activation and cardiac autonomic dysfunction may transiently increase the risk of cardiovascular events .
Cardiorespiratory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with administration of single and multiple vaccines simultaneously .
Inflammation-related effects of adjuvant influenza A vaccination on platelet activation and cardiac autonomic function .
6 ] Children Who Get Flu Vaccine Have Three Times Risk of Hospitalization for Flu , Study Suggests ” In asthmatic children , there was a significantly higher risk of hospitalization in subjects who received the Trivalent Influenza Vaccine , as compared to those who did not .
But no other measured factors — such as insurance plans or severity of asthma — appeared to affect risk of hospitalization @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Impression That Unvaccinated Health Care Workers Place Their Patients at Great Influenza Peril Is Exaggerated .
Conclusion : “ Current scientific data are inadequate to support the ethical implementation of enforced healthcare worker influenza vaccination….
” 9 ] 2017 Study : Flu Shot Associated with Spontaneous Abortion in Pregnant Women There is an association of spontaneous abortion with receipt of inactivated influenza vaccine containing H1N1 10 ] A Johns Hopkins Scientist Has Issued a Blistering Report on Influenza Vaccines in the British Medical Journal 2013 Peter Doshi , Ph.D. , charges that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the public in unprecedented numbers , they are less effective and cause more side effects than alleged by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) .
11 ] The Flu Vaccine Has Been and Continues to be the Most Compensated Vaccine Injury in the Nation As of October 3 , 2016 , there had been 2,954 claims filed in the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program ( VICP ) for injuries and deaths following Influenza vaccination , including 109 deaths and 2,845 serious injuries .
Using the MedAlerts search engine , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there have been more than 128,194 reports of reactions , hospitalizations , injuries and deaths following influenza vaccinations made to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System ( VAERS ) , including 1,270 related deaths , 10,780 hospitalizations , and 2,377 related disabilities .
( Please note that it is a well-known and accepted statistic that only 1 % to 10 % of vaccine injuries are ever reported to the VAERS and far fewer even know there is a special court in the United States to file for compensation for injury or death @ @ @ @ @ @ @ involving Vaccine Injury Compensation can be found in the official Department of Justice ( DOJ ) office of the US Government .
Details of monetary compensation of each US case are included : http : //www.mctlawyers.com/vaccine-injury/cases/ 12 ] In Specific Cases , with Children , Influenza Vaccines Were Associated With Serious Harms Such as Narcolepsy and Febrile Convulsions 13 ] “ Risk of Narcolepsy in Children and Young People Receiving AS03 Adjuvanted Pandemic A/H1N1 2009 Influenza Vaccine : Retrospective Analysis ” NOTE : The association between the influenza vaccine and Guillain-Barre Syndrome ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1976-1977 “ swine flu ” pandemic , and the alarming rate of reported GBS cases following vaccination led to the halting of the flu vaccine campaign .
2015 : Rhabdomyolysis Probably Induced by Influenza Vaccine and Fibrate Therapy 2010 : Rhabdomyolysis With Acute Renal Failure Triggered by the Seasonal Flu Vaccination In A Patient Taking Simvastatin 2017 : Severe Rhabdomyolysis-Induced Renal Failure After Influenza Vaccination in a Patient On Statins Therapy Read more at The Best of Gary G. Kohls , MD About the author : Dr. Gary G Kohls MD [ send @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from Duluth , MN , USA .
In the decade prior to his retirement , he practiced what could best be described as “ holistic ( non-drug ) and preventive mental health care ” .
Since his retirement , he has written a weekly column for the Duluth Reader , an alternative newsweekly magazine .
His columns mostly deal with the dangers of American imperialism , friendly fascism , corporatism , militarism , racism , and the dangers of Big Pharma , psychiatric drugging , the over-vaccinating of children and other movements that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and longevity and the future of the planet .
Many of his columns are archived at Duluthreader.com , Globalresearch.ca or at Transcend.org .
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

18 Reasons to forgo flu vaccinations this year
Written by Gary G. Kohls, MD
In response to the inevitable ad campaigns recommending that “everyone over age 6 months” needs to go to their local hospital, clinic or pharmacy to get their “routine” annual flu shots, I submit below 17 published medical journal articles that have been so ignored and/or censored-out of the mainstream media that most physicians, PAs, nurses, appointment secretaries and, especially, clinic and hospital management are unaware of their existence.
The issue of “flu shot or not” is particularly important this year because there was no influenza epidemic in the Southern Hemisphere’s this year, which means that there could not have been any influenza virus collected that are always chosen 6 months earlier Down Under for the Northern Hemisphere’s next vaccines.
Thus the 3 or 4 strains of influenza viruses chosen, cultured, mass-produced and marketed by Big Pharma corporations this “flu season” for the Northern Hemisphere nations are a total crapshoot and highly likely to have no benefit for potential recipients.
Hence the flu shots offered by GlaxoSmithKline, Sequirus, Sanofi Pasteur, Protein Sciences. (or Merck, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, etc) are likely to be useless at best, dangerous and over-priced at least and any ethical medical entity offering their flu shot this fall must fully inform ALL potential vaccine recipients.
The ethical approach for entities that annually recommend and profit from administering the almost universally ineffective flu shots would be to NOT even offer them this year – with explanations as to why not.
I hope that hospitals, clinics, public health agencies and even pharmacies will do the ethical thing and fully inform their potential clients about the truth about the total absence of accurate scientific information concerning what viruses are included in the flu shot this year. (Please be aware that the big vaccine/pharmaceutical industries quietly made their obviously blind choices for the now already manufactured and already distributed – and CDC-recommended [!!] – flu shots.)
Even though Big Pharma, physicians, hospitals, clinics and public health agencies – and now even pharmacies – commonly cause inadvertent harm to pediatric patients because of their blind adherence to the CDC-approved childhood over-vaccination schedule, they cannot be legally sued for damages to their vaccine-damaged patients due to the Reagan era liability protection legislation.
Of course, for ethical healthcare entities such as clinics and hospitals, the absence of the fear of legal liability should not be a factor in making health care decisions, although that is typically of major importance for for-profit pharmaceutical corporations and pharmacies.
The fact that there has been no logic in Big Pharma’s choice of influenza viral strains that have been chosen to be included in this year’s flu vaccine is only the first of the 18 reasons to forgo flu shots this year. The other 17 are below.
—
17 Published Flu Vaccine Studies that Should Contribute to Vaccine Hesitancy
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=3603385476356977&id=100000566815512
1] Flu Vaccine Recipients Had a 36% Increased Risk of Being Susceptible to the Corona Virus
“Vaccine-Derived Virus Interference was Significantly Associated with Coronavirus and Human Metapneumovirus Infections”
Summary: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31607599
Full text: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X19313647
Influenza vaccination and respiratory virus interference among Department of Defense personnel during the 2017-2018 influenza season.
2] Study Shows Vaccinated Children More Likely to Get Sick with Respiratory illness
“Increased Risk of Non-influenza Respiratory Virus Infections Associated With Receipt of Inactivated Influenza Vaccine.”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22423139
“Those who were vaccinated with the trivalent influenza vaccine had a 440 % increased risk of acute respiratory infection during the nine-month follow-up, compared to those study participants who received the saline placebo. “Not only was there no evidence the vaccine did anything to protect against confirmed influenza infection, it greatly increased the incidence of non-influenza acute respiratory infections in those children who were vaccinated.”
3] Vaccine-Induced Anti-HA2 Antibodies Promote Virus Fusion and Enhance Influenza Virus Respiratory Disease.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23986398
4] Flu Vaccines Found to Increase Heart Attack Risk (Several Studies)
“Inflammation-Related Effects of Adjuvant Influenza A Vaccination on Platelet Activation and Cardiac Autonomic Function”
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/studies-find-flu-shots-can-harm-your-heart-infant-and-fetus
“A concerning study published in 2011 in the International Journal of Medicine revealed a fact rarely addressed by conventional health authorities, or the mostly uncritical mainstream media, namely: flu vaccines result in inflammatory cardiovascular changes indicative of increased risk for serious heart-related events such as heart attack.”
The study concluded: Together with an inflammatory reaction, influenza A vaccine induced platelet activation and sympatho-vagal imbalance towards adrenergic predominance. Significant correlations were found between C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and HRV [heart rate variability] parameters, suggesting a pathophysiological link between inflammation and cardiac autonomic regulation. The vaccine-related platelet activation and cardiac autonomic dysfunction may transiently increase the risk of cardiovascular events.
5] Primary Immunization of Premature Infants with Gestational Age <35 Weeks
Cardiorespiratory complications and C-reactive protein responses were associated with administration of single and multiple vaccines simultaneously.
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/article/crp-level-infants-elevated-48-hours-following-immunization
Inflammation-related effects of adjuvant influenza A vaccination on platelet activation and cardiac autonomic function.
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/article/influenza-vaccination-containing-adjuvant-causes-cardiac-autonomic-dysfunction
6] Children Who Get Flu Vaccine Have Three Times Risk of Hospitalization for Flu, Study Suggests”
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090519172045.htm
In asthmatic children, there was a significantly higher risk of hospitalization in subjects who received the Trivalent Influenza Vaccine, as compared to those who did not. But no other measured factors — such as insurance plans or severity of asthma — appeared to affect risk of hospitalization.
7] 2017 Study Shows That the Impression That Unvaccinated Health Care Workers Place Their Patients at Great Influenza Peril Is Exaggerated.
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163586
Conclusion: “Current scientific data are inadequate to support the ethical implementation of enforced healthcare worker influenza vaccination….”
8] Inflammatory Responses to Trivalent Influenza Virus Vaccine Among Pregnant Women
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21945263
9] 2017 Study: Flu Shot Associated with Spontaneous Abortion in Pregnant Women
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X1730866610.
There is an association of spontaneous abortion with receipt of inactivated influenza vaccine containing H1N1
10] A Johns Hopkins Scientist Has Issued a Blistering Report on Influenza Vaccines in the British Medical Journal 2013
“Influenza: Marketing Vaccine by Marketing Disease”
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f3037
Peter Doshi, Ph.D., charges that although the vaccines are being pushed on the public in unprecedented numbers, they are less effective and cause more side effects than alleged by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
11] The Flu Vaccine Has Been and Continues to be the Most Compensated Vaccine Injury in the Nation
https://www.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/vaccinecompensation/data/statisticsreport.pdf
As of October 3, 2016, there had been 2,954 claims filed in the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) for injuries and deaths following Influenza vaccination, including 109 deaths and 2,845 serious injuries.
Using the MedAlerts search engine, as of June 30, 2016, there have been more than 128,194 reports of reactions, hospitalizations, injuries and deaths following influenza vaccinations made to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), including 1,270 related deaths, 10,780 hospitalizations, and 2,377 related disabilities.
(Please note that it is a well-known and accepted statistic that only 1% to 10 % of vaccine injuries are ever reported to the VAERS and far fewer even know there is a special court in the United States to file for compensation for injury or death.
https://www.nvic.org/nvic-vaccine-news/january-2015/cdc-changes-restrict-vaccine-reaction-reports.aspx
(Note: The VAERS system is laborious, slow, isn’t funded at all by the vaccine corporations and most victims don’t find out about it until after the statute of limitations has run out! In addition, the system is funded by surcharges on every vaccine that is given in the US – paid for by the vaccine recipients!)
NOTE: Current Vaccine Court cases involving Vaccine Injury Compensation can be found in the official Department of Justice (DOJ) office of the US Government. Details of monetary compensation of each US case are included: http://www.mctlawyers.com/vaccine-injury/cases/
12] In Specific Cases, with Children, Influenza Vaccines Were Associated With Serious Harms Such as Narcolepsy and Febrile Convulsions
Cochrane Review 2012
13] “Risk of Narcolepsy in Children and Young People Receiving AS03 Adjuvanted Pandemic A/H1N1 2009 Influenza Vaccine: Retrospective Analysis”
By Elizabeth Miller et al, BMJ, February 26, 2013, https://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f794
14] “Narcolepsy Following Pandemrix Influenza Vaccination in Europe”
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/history/narcolepsy-flu.html
15] “Guillain-Barré Syndrome Following Influenza Vaccination”,
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/199859
16] Jeremy Hammond Cites Additional Vaccine Insert Information, History & Studies.
https://www.jeremyrhammond.com/2019/01/11/how-youre-being-lied-to-about-the-risks-of-getting-a-flu-vaccine-annually/
NOTE: The association between the influenza vaccine and Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) was first identified during the 1976-1977 “swine flu” pandemic, and the alarming rate of reported GBS cases following vaccination led to the halting of the flu vaccine campaign.
17] 6 Case studies of Rhabdomyolysis/Rhabdonecrosis (Muscle Necrosis/Death) Caused by Flu Vaccines
https://academic.oup.com/ndt/article/21/2/530/1850671
Influenza Vaccine-Induced Rhabdomyolysis Leading to Acute Renal Transplant Dysfunction
2016: Post-Vaccination Myositis And Myocarditis In A Previously Healthy Male
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4751718/
2015: Rhabdomyolysis Probably Induced by Influenza Vaccine and Fibrate Therapy
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5047234/
2010: Rhabdomyolysis With Acute Renal Failure Triggered by the Seasonal Flu Vaccination In A Patient Taking Simvastatin
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778082
2017: Severe Rhabdomyolysis-Induced Renal Failure After Influenza Vaccination in a Patient On Statins Therapy
http://www.ijcasereportsandimages.com/archive/2017/003-2017-ijcri/CR-10775-…
2017: Rhabdomyolysis Secondary to Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in a Renal Transplant Recipient
http://www.anzsnasm.com/3090
Read more at The Best of Gary G. Kohls, MD
About the author: Dr. Gary G Kohls MD [send him mail] is a retired physician from Duluth, MN, USA. In the decade prior to his retirement, he practiced what could best be described as “holistic (non-drug) and preventive mental health care”. Since his retirement, he has written a weekly column for the Duluth Reader, an alternative newsweekly magazine. His columns mostly deal with the dangers of American imperialism, friendly fascism, corporatism, militarism, racism, and the dangers of Big Pharma, psychiatric drugging, the over-vaccinating of children and other movements that threaten American democracy, civility, health and longevity and the future of the planet. Many of his columns are archived at Duluthreader.com, Globalresearch.ca or at Transcend.org.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-27--The cyclical nature of climate change

The cyclical nature of climate change

The curve of the population of France since Antiquity shows successive periods of growth followed by impressive falls .
The first phenomenon is a fairly high growth until around the year 350 .
The French population doubled between -100 BC and 300 AD .
It then doubled between 800 and 1200 AD .
It doubled again between 1500 and 1900 .
The falls , in both intervals , correspond to the great pandemics .
The Roman era was a golden age .
60 years before Christ , Julius Caesar ’ s Rome had only one stone temple .
At the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the houses were still mainly made of wood and Rome suffered a terrible fire .
It was rebuilt in stone and brick .
Of course , all the temples and theatres were already made of stone .
The city of Pompeii was made of stone and brick when Vesuvius erupted in 79 AD .
This prosperous period seems to have been characterised by high temperature and high humidity .
Pliny the Elder reports that olive trees were cultivated at unusual altitudes and latitudes .
The boom at the beginning of the Roman imperial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disruption .
In contrast to cooling , which would be dramatic , warming increases agricultural productivity and therefore economic development .
This favourable climatic episode was followed by an economic collapse .
Before the end of the second century , the terrible epidemic of the “ Antonine plague ” ravaged the West ( How the Roman Empire collapsed , Kyle Harper , © La Découverte , 2019 ) .
Emperor Marcus Aurelius , warring in the east of the Roman Empire , was one of its first victims in 180 .
It was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and 541 .
The population collapsed .
The Arab conquerors had no difficulty invading the Middle East and the depopulated Maghreb .
However , the approach of the year 1000 shows an impressive revival of the population , a thousand years after that of the Roman period .
If the growth of the Roman period begins to be linked to the climate , that of the year 1000 is undoubtedly the result of a remarkable rise in temperature .
Around the year 1000 , the West was marked by unprecedented economic and demographic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ extraordinary evolution of tools , armament and architecture was observed .
Proof of this is given by the Bayeux Tapestry .
In 1066 , therefore , all the soldiers of William the Conqueror wear iron helmet , although it was earlier a privilege of high rank warriors as shown by their graves !
A favourable climate made it possible to cultivate areas as unwelcoming as the slopes of the summits of the Massif Central .
They were subsequently abandoned and never exploited again .
It seems that this warming was limited to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only colonisation of Greenland , literally “ the green country ” , which was never green again afterwards !
The Vikings settled there in number from 986 onwards .
However , when the climate change of the time came to an end , they began to disappear , as they could not withstand the normal climate of the region .
Only the Inuit , originating from these regions , are able to live there sustainably , thanks to an adaptation of their organism .
The last descendants of the Vikings had disappeared 450 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
At the beginning of the 14th century , waves of intense cold could be detected in the cores of the glacial zones .
But the climatic warming had had to stop long before .
From 1347 onwards , this reversal of temperature led to a new epidemic , even more terrible than the previous ones : the “ black plague ” .
The population of Europe fell back to the maximum level of the Roman era !
It should be noted that these pandemics occurred during periods of cold weather and always @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the Far East .
It would therefore be the plague bacillus , which is active in winter .
Evidence from the period allows us to identify the “ Black Plague ” of 1347 and the “ Justinian Plague ” of 541 with the bubonic plague .
The swelling of the lymph nodes , which is 80 % fatal , is characteristic .
However , this symptom does not always exist , particularly in the case of previous epidemics which could result from the same bacillus before the final mutation of amino acid @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The fact is that the famous ratus ratus invaded the West , to the furthest point in Scotland , almost 1000 years BC .
This black rat is the main vehicle for the bacillus , which it transmits to fleas , which spread the disease .
Today we are living through a similar climatic episode .
No one doubts it any more .
The global warming would result from the methane released by cows and the carbon dioxide emitted by our thermal power stations and cars .
In my childhood , during meals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worried about the inexorable cooling of the Planet .
It was mentioned in all the newspapers .
They described other planets with freezing temperatures .
I was terrified .
Our Brittany spaniel , who was scratching at the window to get in , seemed to want to take advantage of the warmth of the house before being turned into a block of ice !
A few years ago , an artificial satellite observed a significant layer of methane above the Aigle forest , near Compiègne in the Oise department .
This was after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ does methane come from ?
From rotting leaves , branches , tree trunks and roots .
Almost as much methane .
Moreover , the forests are strewn with glaucous puddles from which methane vapours bubble out .
The mass of a beautiful 20-year-old tree , taking into account the mass of the leaves produced each year , is measured in tonnes ; the total mass of hay consumed in 20 years by a cow is measured in tens of tonnes , but tonnes of dry matter must be removed from the milk .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of one tree , one cow would certainly be very exaggerated , but there are three thousand billion trees on Earth .
The unfortunate cows are only one and a half billion .
While the open-air fermentation of dead leaves and branches produces carbon dioxide , those underneath , or in the water , are deprived of oxygen .
They are methanised and thus give the forests a positive oxygen balance .
The “ angel ’ s share ” , to use the image of the cognac cellar masters , is the share @ @ @ @ @ @ @ barrels .
Without a share of methanisation of leaves , dead branches , roots and abandoned trunks , the oxygen balance of the forests would be neutral as long as the forest park is stable .
The three occurrences of the Roman period , the year 1000 and the present period lead us to attribute a periodicity of about a thousand years to climatic disturbances .
It is therefore necessary to try to go back in time .
Of course , we find the Flood in the Bible , but Plato , in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and in the Timaeus ( 24-25b ) , mentions cyclical dramas that would have periodically brought mankind back to the deepest destitution .
There is talk of floods , plague epidemics and many other scourges that would have practically destroyed mankind .
The last mentioned occurrence , however , would be a distant memory .
The colds that cause plague epidemics occur about 200 years after warming .
According to the work of ethnologists on the oral transmission of traditions , the memory may well have lasted for three or four hundred years @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that probably occurred 750 BC , following a warming that would have marked the beginning of the first millennium BC A funerary boat was discovered in 2012 a few kilometres from Giza in a mastaba of the First Dynasty and thus dating from 3150 to 2900 BC .
The construction of the Mastabas characterises an advanced civilisation with a large workforce .
On the other hand , the imposing pyramid of Cheops would have been built only around 2560 BC .
The cedar that was used to build it , the boat found @ @ @ @ @ @ @ built much earlier according to the carbon 14 measurement .
This is the date of the formation of the wood .
Once the wood is formed , it retains the percentage of carbon 14 in the atmosphere at that time .
This cedar could be about a hundred years old , which allows us to date the boat from the same period as the pyramid .
Stonehenge in the UK was built at the same time as the Great Pyramids , around 3000 BC , but this is a very approximate dating based @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the site rather than its construction .
The climatic event of “ 4200 BP ” , a terrible period of drought , dates from 2200 BC , it accompanied an intense cooling , traces of which are still visible in glaciers all over the world .
This episode can be thought to be part of the intermediate period between the warming of 3000 BC and that of 2000 BC .
On the other hand , unlike the warming of 3000 BC , the cyclical episode of 2000 BC left no obvious traces .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the beginning of the second millennium .
The great Mycenaean civilisation began around 1600 BC .
Four hundred years later , around 1200 , all the Mycenaean palaces and temples were already in ruins .
The rich valleys of Laconia and Attica were deserted .
But prosperity returned around the year 1000 B.C..
The temple of Solomon in Jerusalem , an imposing edifice , dates from this period .
The year 1000 B.C .
also marks , on the other side of the continent , the emergence of a new dynasty in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which provoked , in particular , plague epidemics , occurred between the warming periods .
After 800 , therefore after Homer , all Greece was devastated and was completely depopulated before two successive invasions from the north .
Plato could have grouped these disasters together .
It can also be pointed out that the end of the Roman Republic a little more than a century before the beginning of our era was marked by a general impoverishment and the abandonment of cultures throughout Italy .
A very troubled period that can be traced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ before the end of the first millennium BC .
The mummy of Ötzi , found on the border between Italy and Austria in 1991 , lived around 3300-3250 BC .
The temperature must certainly have been higher then it was until its discovery .
The mummy has remained frozen without interruption until the present day , otherwise it would have rotted .
Even the disturbance in the year 1000 was not enough .
And we are still a long way from that : the valleys of Greenland are not yet green !
Nostalgic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ probably benefited , if I dare say so , from a local treatment .
The drop in the level of the Alpine glaciers began to accelerate as early as the 1970s , long before there was any talk of global warming .
All this leads to a cyclical phenomenon and therefore related to astronomy , in particular to gravitation , which is probably not exclusively mathematical and invariant .
The periodicity would be about a thousand years .
The current abnormal displacement of the Earth ’ s magnetic pole could also be related @ @ @ @ @ @ @ move more slowly and irregularly than before .
Such changes have been observed in the Middle East .
It must be said that the circulation of depressions remains very mysterious , especially in the light of the El Niño phenomenon .
Scientists claim that these changes in the circulation of depressions are the result of global warming resulting from human activities .
I say the exact opposite .
These changes are the cause of the current climate change , just as they have been the cause of previous climate changes .
The atmospheric @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exist in previous episodes .
Even if the current climate change is in no way the result of human activity , the fact remains that industrial development has been polluting the atmosphere for more than two centuries .
In the West , things have changed .
I sometimes re-read the Yellow Mark , the most famous cartoons of Edgar Jacobs ’ “ Blake and Mortimer ” .
London was bathed in its famous smog , a thick fog caused by the fumes from coal-fired heating .
But I go to London from time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sometimes there is fog , a light fog .
Today there is smog in India and China .
Whatever the cause of climate change , we can not continue to pollute the atmosphere and the oceans .
If we link climate change to a cause , even a probable one , we risk turning away from the fight against pollution if that cause appears to be wrong .
The risk is the same when you mix all the problems together .
Fine particles , which I have just mentioned with the “ Yellow @ @ @ @ @ @ @ risk .
The fine particles cause a “ climate cooling ” ( DOI : 10.1126/science.aat1723 ) .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

The cyclical nature of climate change
Written by Jean de Climont
The curve of the population of France since Antiquity shows successive periods of growth followed by impressive falls. The first phenomenon is a fairly high growth until around the year 350. The French population doubled between -100 BC and 300 AD.
It then doubled between 800 and 1200 AD. It doubled again between 1500 and 1900. The falls, in both intervals, correspond to the great pandemics.
The Roman period
The Roman era was a golden age. 60 years before Christ, Julius Caesar’s Rome had only one stone temple. At the beginning of Nero’s reign, the houses were still mainly made of wood and Rome suffered a terrible fire. It was rebuilt in stone and brick. Of course, all the temples and theatres were already made of stone. The city of Pompeii was made of stone and brick when Vesuvius erupted in 79 AD. This prosperous period seems to have been characterised by high temperature and high humidity. Pliny the Elder reports that olive trees were cultivated at unusual altitudes and latitudes.
The boom at the beginning of the Roman imperial era was most certainly due to climatic disruption. In contrast to cooling, which would be dramatic, warming increases agricultural productivity and therefore economic development. This favourable climatic episode was followed by an economic collapse.
Before the end of the second century, the terrible epidemic of the “Antonine plague” ravaged the West (How the Roman Empire collapsed, Kyle Harper, © La Découverte, 2019). Emperor Marcus Aurelius, warring in the east of the Roman Empire, was one of its first victims in 180. It was followed by two other epidemics in 249 and 541. The population collapsed. The Arab conquerors had no difficulty invading the Middle East and the depopulated Maghreb.
The Middle Ages
However, the approach of the year 1000 shows an impressive revival of the population, a thousand years after that of the Roman period. If the growth of the Roman period begins to be linked to the climate, that of the year 1000 is undoubtedly the result of a remarkable rise in temperature.
Around the year 1000, the West was marked by unprecedented economic and demographic development. At that time, an extraordinary evolution of tools, armament and architecture was observed. Proof of this is given by the Bayeux Tapestry. In 1066, therefore, all the soldiers of William the Conqueror wear iron helmet, although it was earlier a privilege of high rank warriors as shown by their graves!
A favourable climate made it possible to cultivate areas as unwelcoming as the slopes of the summits of the Massif Central. They were subsequently abandoned and never exploited again. It seems that this warming was limited to the North Atlantic. This period marks the only colonisation of Greenland, literally “the green country”, which was never green again afterwards! The Vikings settled there in number from 986 onwards. However, when the climate change of the time came to an end, they began to disappear, as they could not withstand the normal climate of the region. Only the Inuit, originating from these regions, are able to live there sustainably, thanks to an adaptation of their organism. The last descendants of the Vikings had disappeared 450 years after they landed on the island.
At the beginning of the 14th century, waves of intense cold could be detected in the cores of the glacial zones. But the climatic warming had had to stop long before.
From 1347 onwards, this reversal of temperature led to a new epidemic, even more terrible than the previous ones: the “black plague”. The population of Europe fell back to the maximum level of the Roman era! It should be noted that these pandemics occurred during periods of cold weather and always began in the Mediterranean ports so coming from the Far East.
It would therefore be the plague bacillus, which is active in winter. Evidence from the period allows us to identify the “Black Plague” of 1347 and the “Justinian Plague” of 541 with the bubonic plague. The swelling of the lymph nodes, which is 80% fatal, is characteristic. However, this symptom does not always exist, particularly in the case of previous epidemics which could result from the same bacillus before the final mutation of amino acid 259 of the bacillus yersinia pestis.
The fact is that the famous ratus ratus invaded the West, to the furthest point in Scotland, almost 1000 years BC. This black rat is the main vehicle for the bacillus, which it transmits to fleas, which spread the disease.
The Present Era
Today we are living through a similar climatic episode. No one doubts it any more. The global warming would result from the methane released by cows and the carbon dioxide emitted by our thermal power stations and cars.
In my childhood, during meals, I used to hear my parents worried about the inexorable cooling of the Planet. It was mentioned in all the newspapers. They described other planets with freezing temperatures. I was terrified. Our Brittany spaniel, who was scratching at the window to get in, seemed to want to take advantage of the warmth of the house before being turned into a block of ice!
A few years ago, an artificial satellite observed a significant layer of methane above the Aigle forest, near Compiègne in the Oise department. This was after a long period without wind. Where does methane come from? From rotting leaves, branches, tree trunks and roots. Almost as much methane. Moreover, the forests are strewn with glaucous puddles from which methane vapours bubble out.
The mass of a beautiful 20-year-old tree, taking into account the mass of the leaves produced each year, is measured in tonnes; the total mass of hay consumed in 20 years by a cow is measured in tens of tonnes, but tonnes of dry matter must be removed from the milk. Milk gives little methane. The equivalence of one tree, one cow would certainly be very exaggerated, but there are three thousand billion trees on Earth. The unfortunate cows are only one and a half billion.
While the open-air fermentation of dead leaves and branches produces carbon dioxide, those underneath, or in the water, are deprived of oxygen. They are methanised and thus give the forests a positive oxygen balance. The “angel’s share”, to use the image of the cognac cellar masters, is the share of the alcohol that evaporates from the barrels. Without a share of methanisation of leaves, dead branches, roots and abandoned trunks, the oxygen balance of the forests would be neutral as long as the forest park is stable.
Antiquity
The three occurrences of the Roman period, the year 1000 and the present period lead us to attribute a periodicity of about a thousand years to climatic disturbances. It is therefore necessary to try to go back in time. Of course, we find the Flood in the Bible, but Plato, in The Laws (III, 677a) and in the Timaeus (24-25b), mentions cyclical dramas that would have periodically brought mankind back to the deepest destitution. There is talk of floods, plague epidemics and many other scourges that would have practically destroyed mankind. The last mentioned occurrence, however, would be a distant memory. The colds that cause plague epidemics occur about 200 years after warming. According to the work of ethnologists on the oral transmission of traditions, the memory may well have lasted for three or four hundred years. Plato therefore referred to an epidemic that probably occurred 750 BC, following a warming that would have marked the beginning of the first millennium BC
Prehistoric times
A funerary boat was discovered in 2012 a few kilometres from Giza in a mastaba of the First Dynasty and thus dating from 3150 to 2900 BC. The construction of the Mastabas characterises an advanced civilisation with a large workforce.
On the other hand, the imposing pyramid of Cheops would have been built only around 2560 BC. The cedar that was used to build it, the boat found nearby, is said to have been built much earlier according to the carbon 14 measurement. This is the date of the formation of the wood. Once the wood is formed, it retains the percentage of carbon 14 in the atmosphere at that time. This cedar could be about a hundred years old, which allows us to date the boat from the same period as the pyramid.
Stonehenge in the UK was built at the same time as the Great Pyramids, around 3000 BC, but this is a very approximate dating based on signs related to the use of the site rather than its construction.
The climatic event of “4200 BP”, a terrible period of drought, dates from 2200 BC, it accompanied an intense cooling, traces of which are still visible in glaciers all over the world. This episode can be thought to be part of the intermediate period between the warming of 3000 BC and that of 2000 BC.
On the other hand, unlike the warming of 3000 BC, the cyclical episode of 2000 BC left no obvious traces. Except for the remarkable development of Babylon from the beginning of the second millennium.
The great Mycenaean civilisation began around 1600 BC. Four hundred years later, around 1200, all the Mycenaean palaces and temples were already in ruins. The rich valleys of Laconia and Attica were deserted.
But prosperity returned around the year 1000 B.C.. The temple of Solomon in Jerusalem, an imposing edifice, dates from this period. The year 1000 B.C. also marks, on the other side of the continent, the emergence of a new dynasty in China, the Zhou.
Cooling, which provoked, in particular, plague epidemics, occurred between the warming periods. After 800, therefore after Homer, all Greece was devastated and was completely depopulated before two successive invasions from the north. Plato could have grouped these disasters together.
It can also be pointed out that the end of the Roman Republic a little more than a century before the beginning of our era was marked by a general impoverishment and the abandonment of cultures throughout Italy. A very troubled period that can be traced back to the disasters that took place before the end of the first millennium BC.
The mummy of Ötzi, found on the border between Italy and Austria in 1991, lived around 3300-3250 BC. The temperature must certainly have been higher then it was until its discovery. The mummy has remained frozen without interruption until the present day, otherwise it would have rotted. Even the disturbance in the year 1000 was not enough. And we are still a long way from that: the valleys of Greenland are not yet green! Nostalgic novels will wait. The mummy has probably benefited, if I dare say so, from a local treatment. The drop in the level of the Alpine glaciers began to accelerate as early as the 1970s, long before there was any talk of global warming.
Conclusion
All this leads to a cyclical phenomenon and therefore related to astronomy, in particular to gravitation, which is probably not exclusively mathematical and invariant. The periodicity would be about a thousand years. The current abnormal displacement of the Earth’s magnetic pole could also be related to this phenomenon.
Depressions seem to move more slowly and irregularly than before. Such changes have been observed in the Middle East. It must be said that the circulation of depressions remains very mysterious, especially in the light of the El Niño phenomenon. Scientists claim that these changes in the circulation of depressions are the result of global warming resulting from human activities. I say the exact opposite. These changes are the cause of the current climate change, just as they have been the cause of previous climate changes. The atmospheric pollution that marks our time did not exist in previous episodes.
Even if the current climate change is in no way the result of human activity, the fact remains that industrial development has been polluting the atmosphere for more than two centuries. In the West, things have changed. I sometimes re-read the Yellow Mark, the most famous cartoons of Edgar Jacobs’ “Blake and Mortimer”. London was bathed in its famous smog, a thick fog caused by the fumes from coal-fired heating. But I go to London from time to time, in all seasons. Sometimes there is fog, a light fog. Today there is smog in India and China.
Whatever the cause of climate change, we cannot continue to pollute the atmosphere and the oceans. If we link climate change to a cause, even a probable one, we risk turning away from the fight against pollution if that cause appears to be wrong.
The risk is the same when you mix all the problems together. Fine particles, which I have just mentioned with the “Yellow Mark” smog, are a health risk. The fine particles cause a “climate cooling” (DOI: 10.1126/science.aat1723).
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-27--Official UK Data Show NO COVID19 Deaths After May 2020

Official UK Data Show NO COVID19 Deaths After May 2020 My previous report for Principia Scientific International ( October 11 , 2020 ) showed the graph below where the weekly mortality rates for England and Wales for the last 21 years , 1999-2020 are plotted : Figure 1 .
Plot of all weekly mortality rates for last 21 years ( 1999 – 2020 ) .
Highlighted years 2020 ( red ) , 1999/2000 ( light blue ) and 2019 ( yellow ) The undisputed fact from that graph was that since the end of May it was impossible to differentiate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ previous 20 years and I made the following conclusion : “ Fact 3 .
It is scientifically , statistically , and logically impossible to argue , that it is justifiable to impose the unprecedented lockdown of this country , using extremely high weekly mortality rates observed in April and May , while totally ignoring the fact the weekly mortality rates for the last the 4 months have returned back to normal and are indistinguishable from the same annual period observed in last 21 years .
Instead of totally removing distancing and face masks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ another round of lockdowns .
Why and on what evidence – it can not be weekly mortality rates ” It seems that the government and all the news outlets have come to the same conclusion and recently have abandoned a very honourable mantra about saving human lives to a new and much less honourable slogan ‘ Hundreds of thousands of new cases… ” Let us now look at some facts and more lies and see whether you can decide which is which .
To emphasise the issue of no excess deaths since the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ graph below as a little quiz question for the statisticians at The Office of National Statistics , NOS , and governmental advisors : “ Can you tell which line belongs to 2020 ” ?
To give you a little hint , that little light blue blip in august is not 2020 but belongs to 2003 : Figure 2 .
Mortality rates for weeks between the end of May and the first week in October for all the years between 1999 and 2020 Each line represents the mortality rates between w-22 ( 29 May @ @ @ @ @ @ @ while the scale of Y-axis goes from 0 to 24,000 and identical to the scale of Fig.1 at the top of the report since has been extracted from the same graph .
It very clearly reflects drastic drop of mortality from 22,351 ( w-16 2020 ) to the levels of around 9,000 for the last 4 months which are almost identical for all years between 1999 and 2020 .
So , the question “ Can you tell which line belongs to 2020 ” is a really a nasty question and difficult to answer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ phrase ‘ help saving human lives ’ has disappeared from the vocabulary of the news reporting !
!
You see , if you make the most logical conclusion – “ it is impossible to differentiate weekly mortalities between 2020 and previous 20 years ” , it must follow that the lockdowns can not be justified by the excess mortality argument !
So , the only other way to justify the new lockdowns is to drop word ‘ mortality ’ and invent another catch phrase , like ‘ number of new cases ’ .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ problem even more difficult to argue .
As you will see below , the latest ‘ number of cases ’ quoted are about 760,000 but they are not causing any mortality , see Fig.2 .
As it always happens when one is caught lying or ‘ massaging ’ the data , one is now stuck with this illogical set of arguments : • How to explain the fact that out of 760,000 positive tests for Covid-19 ( see below ) nobody has died and has survived without any vaccination or any drug treatment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the tests for Covid-19 are 100 % accurate but nobody has died , then Covid-19 is not any different then any other flu • If the tests are 100 % inaccurate then why quoting them and use them for another round of lockdowns • It is impossible to justify new round of lockdowns using either scientific or statistical arguments with the objective to save human lives without offending our intelligence Could it possibly be that all those anonymous scientists have totally forgotten and ignored the survival of the fittest throughout millions of years @ @ @ @ @ @ @ powerful defensive tools that we humans have – our immune system ?
But logical thinking and basic understanding of science and statistics obviously has no place in the news reporting .
If anyone knows how to square the circle and can interpret the numbers below , please let me know .
Just to point out to you that BBC ’ s death numbers are from April and May ( see Fig.2 ) while the new 241 deaths probably come after consulting Mystic Meg for her prediction : Figure 4 .
More of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Butina has spent his professional career of 40 years in the Drug Discovery sector , 20 years as an experimental chemist during which time he was an integral part of the team that discovered the first effective treatment for migraine .
During his last 20 years , he moved in the field of the computational drug discovery where computers and statistics are used to optimise the potential drug-like molecules in terms of their activity and safety .
During that period , he developed a new clustering algorithm that can classify/group molecules in terms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and drug-like properties .
His algorithm became a standard in the global pharmaceutical industry and academia .
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Official UK Data Show NO COVID19 Deaths After May 2020
Written by Dr Darko Butina
My previous report for Principia Scientific International (October 11, 2020) showed the graph below where the weekly mortality rates for England and Wales for the last 21 years, 1999-2020 are plotted:
Figure 1. Plot of all weekly mortality rates for last 21 years (1999 – 2020). Highlighted years 2020 (red), 1999/2000 (light blue) and 2019 (yellow)
The undisputed fact from that graph was that since the end of May it was impossible to differentiate weekly mortality rates between 2020 and the previous 20 years and I made the following conclusion:
“Fact 3. It is scientifically, statistically, and logically impossible to argue, that it is justifiable to impose the unprecedented lockdown of this country, using extremely high weekly mortality rates observed in April and May, while totally ignoring the fact the weekly mortality rates for the last the 4 months have returned back to normal and are indistinguishable from the same annual period observed in last 21 years. Instead of totally removing distancing and face masks, the government is talking about starting another round of lockdowns. Why and on what evidence – it cannot be weekly mortality rates”
It seems that the government and all the news outlets have come to the same conclusion and recently have abandoned a very honourable mantra about saving human lives to a new and much less honourable slogan ‘Hundreds of thousands of new cases…”
Let us now look at some facts and more lies and see whether you can decide which is which.
To emphasise the issue of no excess deaths since the end of May, I produced this graph below as a little quiz question for the statisticians at The Office of National Statistics, NOS, and governmental advisors: “Can you tell which line belongs to 2020”?
To give you a little hint, that little light blue blip in august is not 2020 but belongs to 2003:
Figure 2. Mortality rates for weeks between the end of May and the first week in October for all the years between 1999 and 2020
Each line represents the mortality rates between w-22 (29 May) w-40 (2 October), while the scale of Y-axis goes from 0 to 24,000 and identical to the scale of Fig.1 at the top of the report since has been extracted from the same graph. It very clearly reflects drastic drop of mortality from 22,351 (w-16 2020) to the levels of around 9,000 for the last 4 months which are almost identical for all years between 1999 and 2020.
So, the question “Can you tell which line belongs to 2020” is a really a nasty question and difficult to answer, but it does explain why the phrase ‘help saving human lives’ has disappeared from the vocabulary of the news reporting!!
You see, if you make the most logical conclusion – “it is impossible to differentiate weekly mortalities between 2020 and previous 20 years”, it must follow that the lockdowns cannot be justified by the excess mortality argument! So, the only other way to justify the new lockdowns is to drop word ‘mortality’ and invent another catch phrase, like ‘number of new cases’.
But now you get stuck with another problem even more difficult to argue. As you will see below, the latest ‘number of cases’ quoted are about 760,000 but they are not causing any mortality, see Fig.2. As it always happens when one is caught lying or ‘massaging’ the data, one is now stuck with this illogical set of arguments:
How to explain the fact that out of 760,000 positive tests for Covid-19 (see below) nobody has died and has survived without any vaccination or any drug treatment (see above)? If the tests for Covid-19 are 100% accurate but nobody has died, then Covid-19 is not any different then any other flu If the tests are 100% inaccurate then why quoting them and use them for another round of lockdowns It is impossible to justify new round of lockdowns using either scientific or statistical arguments with the objective to save human lives without offending our intelligence
Could it possibly be that all those anonymous scientists have totally forgotten and ignored the survival of the fittest throughout millions of years of evolution which has developed the most powerful defensive tools that we humans have – our immune system?
But logical thinking and basic understanding of science and statistics obviously has no place in the news reporting. If anyone knows how to square the circle and can interpret the numbers below, please let me know. Just to point out to you that BBC’s death numbers are from April and May (see Fig.2) while the new 241 deaths probably come after consulting Mystic Meg for her prediction:
Figure 3. Latest statistics from the BBC
Figure 4. More of the same
About the author: Dr Darko Butina has spent his professional career of 40 years in the Drug Discovery sector, 20 years as an experimental chemist during which time he was an integral part of the team that discovered the first effective treatment for migraine. During his last 20 years, he moved in the field of the computational drug discovery where computers and statistics are used to optimise the potential drug-like molecules in terms of their activity and safety. During that period, he developed a new clustering algorithm that can classify/group molecules in terms of their chemical structure, activity, and drug-like properties. His algorithm became a standard in the global pharmaceutical industry and academia.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-27--COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Rigged to Pass Efficacy Test

There ’ s been a lot of talk lately about whether or not the fast-tracked COVID-19 vaccine will in fact be safe and effective .
While vaccine makers insist that any vaccine reaching the market will have undergone rigorous testing , the way trial protocols are designed suggests these vaccines may leave a lot to be desired .
As reported1 by Forbes contributor William Haseltine , a former professor at Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health , while Moderna , Pfizer , AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson have all published their vaccine trial protocols in a rare @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the protocols raises surprising concerns.
” In a nutshell , the trial designs are such that the vaccines will get a passing grade even if their efficacy is minimal .
Of course , we must also consider vaccine side effects and I ’ ve also written several articles about mounting safety concerns .
As noted by Haseltine , prevention of infection would typically be a critical endpoint of any vaccine trial .
In other words , you want to ensure that when you take the vaccine , your risk of infection is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comes to the COVID-19 vaccine , shockingly , preventing infection is not a criterion for success in any of these trials .
The only criterion for a successful COVID-19 vaccine is a reduction of COVID-19 symptoms , and even then , the reduction required is minimal .
To get a “ passing ” grade in the limited interim analysis , a vaccine must show a 70 % efficacy .
However , again , this does not mean it will prevent infection in 7 of 10 people .
As explained by Haseltine:3 The other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ similar protocol , where only a limited number of vaccinated participants are exposed to the virus to evaluate the extent of their symptoms .
Johnson & Johnson ’ s interim analysis will include results from 77 vaccine recipients who have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 , and if fewer than 18 of them develop symptoms of COVID-19 , compared to 59 in the control group , the vaccine will be considered successful .
In AstraZeneca ’ s case , the interim analysis includes 50 vaccine recipients .
The vaccine will be a success if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to SARS-CoV-2 , compared to 19 in the 25-person control group .
Pfizer ’ s interim analysis is the smallest of the bunch , with just 32 vaccine recipients .
Their success margin is seven or fewer vaccine recipients developing symptoms , compared to 25 in the control group .
In the primary analysis , efficacy is set to about 60 % , and at most , 164 volunteers will be included in that analysis .
Especially concerning are that those receiving the vaccine in these trials are young and healthy individuals who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dying from COVID-19 .
This makes the results of these trials highly questionable in the far more vulnerable population of the elderly .
Trials Are Merely Testing Reduction of Common Cold Symptoms As if that ’ s not eyebrow-raising enough , the minimum qualification for a “ case of COVID-19 ” amounts to just one positive PCR test and one or two mild symptoms , such as headache , fever , cough or mild nausea .
As noted by Haseltine , “ This is far from adequate.
” All they ’ re doing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine will minimize common cold symptoms .
They are not actually ensuring the vaccine will prevent serious COVID-19 complications .
Johnson & Johnson ’ s trial is the only one that requires at least five severe COVID-19 cases to be included in the interim analysis .
Severe illness and death are also secondary objectives in these trials , and none of them include failure to prevent hospitalization or death as an important barrier to success .
The increasingly disappearing common sense tells us that if the vaccine can not reduce infection , hospitalization @ @ @ @ @ @ @ end the pandemic , which means everyone who takes the vaccine will be doing so in vain .
Some COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Are Not Using Inert Placebos In addition to all of that , some COVID-19 vaccine trials are using other vaccines as “ placebo ” rather than truly biologically inert substances such as saline , which effectively makes if far easier to hide any vaccine side effects .
While Moderna is using a saline solution placebo,5 AstraZeneca is using injected meningococcal vaccine rather than a true placebo.6 Another way AstraZeneca is masking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine along with certain drugs .
In one of its study arms , subjects are given acetaminophen every six hours for the first 24 hours after inoculation .
The pain and fever reducer could potentially mask and downplay side effects such as pain , fever , headache or general malaise .
In addition to masking side effects , it is widely recognized among literate natural medicine physicians that using acetaminophen during acute viral infections is not a wise strategy as it impairs the immune response to fight the infection .
September 6 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine trial due to a “ suspected serious and unexpected adverse reaction ” in a British participant.8,9 The company did not initially divulge the nature of the adverse reaction , but it has since been revealed the volunteer developed severe inflammation of the spinal cord , known as transverse myelitis.10,11 September 12 , 2020 , the British Medicines Health Regulatory Authority gave AstraZeneca the go-ahead to resume its Phase 3 trial in the U.K. , after an independent review found it “ safe to do so.
” 12,13 According to an AstraZeneca spokesperson @ @ @ @ @ @ @ undiagnosed multiple sclerosis.14 Days later , September 19 , 2020 , The New York Times reported15 a second case of transverse myelitis had occurred in the AstraZeneca trial .
According to one expert consulted by the NYT , the occurrence represented a “ dangerous pattern , ” and that a third incidence might shut down the vaccine trial indefinitely .
AstraZeneca , however , claims the two cases are “ unlikely to be associated with the vaccine , ” and that there ’ s “ insufficient evidence to say for certain that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the vaccine.
” 16 October 21 , 2020 , it was reported17 that one of the volunteers in AstraZeneca ’ s Brazilian trial had died from COVID-19 complications , but that the trial would continue anyway .
October 12 , 2020 , Johnson & Johnson halted its trial due to “ unexplained illness ” in one of its participants.18,19 Like AstraZeneca , Johnson & Johnson has kept mum about the details of the illness , saying “ it ’ s important to have all the facts before we share additional information.
” The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ halted is surprising considering the rate of side effects20 occurring in perfectly healthy volunteers .
As reported in “ Gates Tries to Justify Side Effects of Fast-Tracked Vaccine , ” after the first of two doses of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine , 80 % of Phase 1 participants receiving the 100 microgram ( mcg ) dose developed systemic side effects.21 After the second dose , 100 % reported side effects ranging from fatigue ( 80 % ) , chills ( 80 % ) , headache ( 60 % ) and myalgia or muscle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that , the 100-mcg dose was ultimately chosen to move on to Phase 3 trials.22 In the highest dosage group , which received 250 mcg , 100 % of participants suffered side effects after both the first and second doses.23 Three of the 14 participants ( 21 % ) in the 250-mcg group suffered “ one or more severe events.
” An October 1 , 2020 , report24 by CNBC reviews the experiences of five participants in Moderna ’ s and Pfizer ’ s SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trials .
One of the participants in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up with chills , shaking so hard he cracked a tooth after taking the second dose.
” A Moderna trial participant told CNBC he had a low-grade fever and felt “ under the weather ” for several days after his first shot .
Eight hours after his second shot he was “ bed-bound with a fever of over 101 , shakes , chills , a pounding headache and shortness of breath .
He said the pain in his arm , where he received the shot , felt like a ‘ goose egg on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ night , recording that his temperature was higher than 100 degrees for five hours.
” 25 Two others reported similar side effects , and a third warned you would need to take a day off after the second shot .
CNBC also noted that “ as companies progressed through clinical trials , several vaccine makers abandoned their highest doses following reports of more severe reactions.
” Might Certain COVID-19 Vaccines Raise Risk of AIDS ?
Disturbingly , a group of researchers are now expressing concern that some COVID-19 vaccine candidates might put certain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ HIV , the virus that causes AIDS.26,27,28 Using the failed attempt to create an HIV vaccine as an example , researchers explain29 that the genetically engineered adenovirus , Ad5 , used in the HIV vaccine trials , is the same one being used now in four COVID-19 candidates being studied in the U.S. , Russia and Pakistan .
At the time of the failed HIV vaccine , scientists were unable to identify the exact reason why Ad5 seemed to increase the risk of HIV ; it just inexplicably did .
Interestingly , Dr. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the HIV study,30 in which he questioned “ whether the problem extends to some or all of the other recombinant vectors currently in development or to other vector-based vaccines.
” Reflecting on that question , the researchers say they decided to go public with this information now , because Ad5 vaccines for COVID-19 might soon be tested in populations with high HIV prevalence , and they believe that informed consent about the HIV/AIDS risk should be part of the COVID-19 clinical studies .
According to one September 2020 poll,31 only 51 % of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” would get the COVID-19 vaccine when it comes out .
Another survey32 found only 44 % would take the first-generation vaccine even if they were paid $ 100 .
Mounting vaccine hesitancy was bemoaned in an October 1 , 2020 , article33 in the New England Journal of Medicine , and the answer , the article suggests , is to make it mandatory for all .
And , to entice compliance , the authors recommend implementing severe penalties for noncompliance , such as the suspension of employment and/or house arrest .
An @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by Wisconsin Public Radio also warns that if precedents hold , employers may have the right to force workers to get vaccinated .
Potential exceptions might include certain medical issues , bona fide religious objections , and certain union contracts that bar vaccine requirements .
Operation Warp Speed recently selected Walgreens and CVS as nationwide partners in the coming vaccine distribution effort.35 Nursing homes and long-term care facilities around the U.S. can opt in by signing up to have either of these companies come and administer the vaccine to its residents and staff @ @ @ @ @ @ @ passports ” are also becoming reality .
Ireland , for example , has already begun its national trial .
The Health Passport Ireland initiative uses an app to track and display results of COVID-19 testing .
Vaccination status will be added once a vaccine becomes available .
Untold amounts of money are also being spent on programs to tag , track and trace the human population in the name of public health and safety .
According to an article36 in the journal JAMA , the estimated cumulative costs of the COVID-19 pandemic related @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to more than $ 16 trillion in the U.S. alone , or about 90 % of our annual gross domestic product .
“ For this reason , policies that can materially reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2 have enormous social value , ” the article claims .
However , testing , tracing and isolation rules , all of which are promoted in this article , also have a price , and it ’ s one that any sensible person would reject , namely the loss of privacy and liberty .
As reported37 by The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our freedom in the name of public health .
Do we really want to live in a “ biosecurity state ” ?
These freedom-robbing strategies are being sold to us as the path back to normalcy , but the reality will be anything but normal .
As detailed in “ The Global Takeover Is Underway , ” the pandemic and the global response to it is far from accidental .
Overwhelmingly , the evidence points to it being part of a much larger scheme to implement the last stages of a technocratic takeover @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aspects of this globalists agenda in “ COVID Symptoms of Power : Tech Billionaires Harvest Humanity , ” “ Tech Billionaires Aiming at a Global Currency , ” “ Harvard Professor Exposes Surveillance Capitalism , ” “ How Medical Technocracy Made the Plandemic Possible ” and “ US Surveillance Bill 6666 : The Devil in the Details.
” The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically widened the economic gap between average people and the wealthy elite,38,39 and continuing down the path we ’ re currently on will only make this disparity worse , not better @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about creating a better world for the average person , it ’ s about enslaving us so that we can not reject or even resist what ’ s ultimately coming .
Forced vaccinations are but one aspect of the plan that must be resisted at all cost .

COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Rigged to Pass Efficacy Test
Written by Dr. Joseph Mercola
There’s been a lot of talk lately about whether or not the fast-tracked COVID-19 vaccine will in fact be safe and effective. While vaccine makers insist that any vaccine reaching the market will have undergone rigorous testing, the way trial protocols are designed suggests these vaccines may leave a lot to be desired.
As reported1 by Forbes contributor William Haseltine, a former professor at Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health, while Moderna, Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson have all published their vaccine trial protocols in a rare display of transparency, “close inspection of the protocols raises surprising concerns.”
In a nutshell, the trial designs are such that the vaccines will get a passing grade even if their efficacy is minimal. Of course, we must also consider vaccine side effects and I’ve also written several articles about mounting safety concerns.
Trials Rigged to Pass Efficacy Test
As noted by Haseltine, prevention of infection would typically be a critical endpoint of any vaccine trial. In other words, you want to ensure that when you take the vaccine, your risk of infection is significantly reduced.
However, when it comes to the COVID-19 vaccine, shockingly, preventing infection is not a criterion for success in any of these trials. The only criterion for a successful COVID-19 vaccine is a reduction of COVID-19 symptoms, and even then, the reduction required is minimal.
“We all expect an effective vaccine to prevent serious illness if infected. Three of the vaccine protocols — Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca — do not require that their vaccine prevent serious disease only that they prevent moderate symptoms which may be as mild as cough, or headache,” Haseltine writes,2 adding:
“The pharmaceutical companies intend to do trials ranging from 30,000 to 60,000 participants. This scale of study would be sufficient for testing vaccine efficacy.
The first surprise found upon a closer reading of the protocols reveals that each study intends to complete interim and primary analyses that at most include 164 participants. These companies likely intend to apply for an emergency use authorization (EUA) from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with just their limited preliminary results.”
To get a “passing” grade in the limited interim analysis, a vaccine must show a 70% efficacy. However, again, this does not mean it will prevent infection in 7 of 10 people. As explained by Haseltine:3
“For Moderna, the initial interim analysis will be based on the results of infection of only 53 people. The judgment reached in interim analysis is dependent upon the difference in the number of people with symptoms … in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated group. Moderna’s success margin is for 13 or less of those 53 to develop symptoms compared to 40 or more in their control group.”
The other vaccine makers are basing results on a similar protocol, where only a limited number of vaccinated participants are exposed to the virus to evaluate the extent of their symptoms.
Johnson & Johnson’s interim analysis will include results from 77 vaccine recipients who have been infected with SARS-CoV-2, and if fewer than 18 of them develop symptoms of COVID-19, compared to 59 in the control group, the vaccine will be considered successful.
In AstraZeneca’s case, the interim analysis includes 50 vaccine recipients. The vaccine will be a success if 12 or fewer develop symptoms after exposure to SARS-CoV-2, compared to 19 in the 25-person control group.
Pfizer’s interim analysis is the smallest of the bunch, with just 32 vaccine recipients. Their success margin is seven or fewer vaccine recipients developing symptoms, compared to 25 in the control group. In the primary analysis, efficacy is set to about 60%, and at most, 164 volunteers will be included in that analysis.
Especially concerning are that those receiving the vaccine in these trials are young and healthy individuals who are not really at high risk of dying from COVID-19. This makes the results of these trials highly questionable in the far more vulnerable population of the elderly.
Trials Are Merely Testing Reduction of Common Cold Symptoms
As if that’s not eyebrow-raising enough, the minimum qualification for a “case of COVID-19” amounts to just one positive PCR test and one or two mild symptoms, such as headache, fever, cough or mild nausea. As noted by Haseltine, “This is far from adequate.”
All they’re doing is testing to see if this COVID-19 vaccine will minimize common cold symptoms. They are not actually ensuring the vaccine will prevent serious COVID-19 complications. Johnson & Johnson’s trial is the only one that requires at least five severe COVID-19 cases to be included in the interim analysis.
“One of the more immediate questions a trial needs to answer is whether a vaccine prevents infection. If someone takes this vaccine, are they far less likely to become infected with the virus?
These trials all clearly focus on eliminating symptoms of COVID-19, and not infections themselves. Asymptomatic infection is listed as a secondary objective in these trials when they should be of critical importance.
It appears that all the pharmaceutical companies assume that the vaccine will never prevent infection. Their criteria for approval is the difference in symptoms between an infected control group and an infected vaccine group. They do not measure the difference between infection and noninfection as a primary motivation,” Haseltine writes.4
Severe illness and death are also secondary objectives in these trials, and none of them include failure to prevent hospitalization or death as an important barrier to success. The increasingly disappearing common sense tells us that if the vaccine cannot reduce infection, hospitalization or death, then it cannot end the pandemic, which means everyone who takes the vaccine will be doing so in vain.
Some COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Are Not Using Inert Placebos
In addition to all of that, some COVID-19 vaccine trials are using other vaccines as “placebo” rather than truly biologically inert substances such as saline, which effectively makes if far easier to hide any vaccine side effects. While Moderna is using a saline solution placebo,5 AstraZeneca is using injected meningococcal vaccine rather than a true placebo.6
Another way AstraZeneca is masking potential side effects is by administering the vaccine along with certain drugs. In one of its study arms, subjects are given acetaminophen every six hours for the first 24 hours after inoculation. The pain and fever reducer could potentially mask and downplay side effects such as pain, fever, headache or general malaise.
In addition to masking side effects, it is widely recognized among literate natural medicine physicians that using acetaminophen during acute viral infections is not a wise strategy as it impairs the immune response to fight the infection.
As reported by Wired:7
“The press release for … results from the Oxford vaccine trials described an increased frequency of ‘minor side effects’ among participants. A look at the actual paper, though, reveals this to be a marketing spin …
Yes, mild reactions were far more common than worse ones. But moderate or severe harms — defined as being bad enough to interfere with daily life or needing medical care — were common too.
Around one-third of people vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccine without acetaminophen experienced moderate or severe chills, fatigue, headache, malaise, and/or feverishness.
Close to 10 percent had a fever of at least 100.4 degrees, and just over one-fourth developed moderate or severe muscle aches. That’s a lot, in a young and healthy group of people — and the acetaminophen didn’t help much for most of those problems.”
Two Trials Paused Due to Safety Concerns
September 6, 2020, AstraZeneca paused its Phase 3 vaccine trial due to a “suspected serious and unexpected adverse reaction” in a British participant.8,9 The company did not initially divulge the nature of the adverse reaction, but it has since been revealed the volunteer developed severe inflammation of the spinal cord, known as transverse myelitis.10,11
September 12, 2020, the British Medicines Health Regulatory Authority gave AstraZeneca the go-ahead to resume its Phase 3 trial in the U.K., after an independent review found it “safe to do so.”12,13 According to an AstraZeneca spokesperson, the incident was a case of undiagnosed multiple sclerosis.14
Days later, September 19, 2020, The New York Times reported15 a second case of transverse myelitis had occurred in the AstraZeneca trial. According to one expert consulted by the NYT, the occurrence represented a “dangerous pattern,” and that a third incidence might shut down the vaccine trial indefinitely.
AstraZeneca, however, claims the two cases are “unlikely to be associated with the vaccine,” and that there’s “insufficient evidence to say for certain that the illnesses were or were not related to the vaccine.”16 October 21, 2020, it was reported17 that one of the volunteers in AstraZeneca’s Brazilian trial had died from COVID-19 complications, but that the trial would continue anyway.
October 12, 2020, Johnson & Johnson halted its trial due to “unexplained illness” in one of its participants.18,19 Like AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson has kept mum about the details of the illness, saying “it’s important to have all the facts before we share additional information.”
Side Effects Are Commonplace
The fact that more trials have not been halted is surprising considering the rate of side effects20 occurring in perfectly healthy volunteers. As reported in “Gates Tries to Justify Side Effects of Fast-Tracked Vaccine,” after the first of two doses of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, 80% of Phase 1 participants receiving the 100 microgram (mcg) dose developed systemic side effects.21
After the second dose, 100% reported side effects ranging from fatigue (80%), chills (80%), headache (60%) and myalgia or muscle pain (53%).
Despite that, the 100-mcg dose was ultimately chosen to move on to Phase 3 trials.22 In the highest dosage group, which received 250 mcg, 100% of participants suffered side effects after both the first and second doses.23 Three of the 14 participants (21%) in the 250-mcg group suffered “one or more severe events.”
An October 1, 2020, report24 by CNBC reviews the experiences of five participants in Moderna’s and Pfizer’s SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trials. One of the participants in Pfizer’s vaccine trial “woke up with chills, shaking so hard he cracked a tooth after taking the second dose.”
A Moderna trial participant told CNBC he had a low-grade fever and felt “under the weather” for several days after his first shot. Eight hours after his second shot he was “bed-bound with a fever of over 101, shakes, chills, a pounding headache and shortness of breath. He said the pain in his arm, where he received the shot, felt like a ‘goose egg on my shoulder.’ He hardly slept that night, recording that his temperature was higher than 100 degrees for five hours.”25
Two others reported similar side effects, and a third warned you would need to take a day off after the second shot. CNBC also noted that “as companies progressed through clinical trials, several vaccine makers abandoned their highest doses following reports of more severe reactions.”
Might Certain COVID-19 Vaccines Raise Risk of AIDS?
Disturbingly, a group of researchers are now expressing concern that some COVID-19 vaccine candidates might put certain people at a higher risk of acquiring HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.26,27,28
Using the failed attempt to create an HIV vaccine as an example, researchers explain29 that the genetically engineered adenovirus, Ad5, used in the HIV vaccine trials, is the same one being used now in four COVID-19 candidates being studied in the U.S., Russia and Pakistan.
At the time of the failed HIV vaccine, scientists were unable to identify the exact reason why Ad5 seemed to increase the risk of HIV; it just inexplicably did. Interestingly, Dr. Anthony Fauci was the lead author on the HIV study,30 in which he questioned “whether the problem extends to some or all of the other recombinant vectors currently in development or to other vector-based vaccines.”
Reflecting on that question, the researchers say they decided to go public with this information now, because Ad5 vaccines for COVID-19 might soon be tested in populations with high HIV prevalence, and they believe that informed consent about the HIV/AIDS risk should be part of the COVID-19 clinical studies.
Will COVID-19 Vaccine Be Mandatory?
According to one September 2020 poll,31 only 51% of Americans said they “definitely or probably” would get the COVID-19 vaccine when it comes out. Another survey32 found only 44% would take the first-generation vaccine even if they were paid $100. Mounting vaccine hesitancy was bemoaned in an October 1, 2020, article33 in the New England Journal of Medicine, and the answer, the article suggests, is to make it mandatory for all.
And, to entice compliance, the authors recommend implementing severe penalties for noncompliance, such as the suspension of employment and/or house arrest.
An October 19, 2020, article 34 by Wisconsin Public Radio also warns that if precedents hold, employers may have the right to force workers to get vaccinated. Potential exceptions might include certain medical issues, bona fide religious objections, and certain union contracts that bar vaccine requirements.
Operation Warp Speed recently selected Walgreens and CVS as nationwide partners in the coming vaccine distribution effort.35 Nursing homes and long-term care facilities around the U.S. can opt in by signing up to have either of these companies come and administer the vaccine to its residents and staff, once available.
So-called “health passports” are also becoming reality. Ireland, for example, has already begun its national trial. The Health Passport Ireland initiative uses an app to track and display results of COVID-19 testing. Vaccination status will be added once a vaccine becomes available.
Untold amounts of money are also being spent on programs to tag, track and trace the human population in the name of public health and safety. According to an article36 in the journal JAMA, the estimated cumulative costs of the COVID-19 pandemic related to lost output and health reduction amounts to more than $16 trillion in the U.S. alone, or about 90% of our annual gross domestic product.
“For this reason, policies that can materially reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2 have enormous social value,” the article claims. However, testing, tracing and isolation rules, all of which are promoted in this article, also have a price, and it’s one that any sensible person would reject, namely the loss of privacy and liberty.
As reported37 by The Last American Vagabond, governments are selling our freedom in the name of public health. Do we really want to live in a “biosecurity state”? These freedom-robbing strategies are being sold to us as the path back to normalcy, but the reality will be anything but normal.
As detailed in “The Global Takeover Is Underway,” the pandemic and the global response to it is far from accidental. Overwhelmingly, the evidence points to it being part of a much larger scheme to implement the last stages of a technocratic takeover.
I’ve also covered various aspects of this globalists agenda in “COVID Symptoms of Power: Tech Billionaires Harvest Humanity,” “Tech Billionaires Aiming at a Global Currency,” “Harvard Professor Exposes Surveillance Capitalism,” “How Medical Technocracy Made the Plandemic Possible” and “US Surveillance Bill 6666: The Devil in the Details.”
The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically widened the economic gap between average people and the wealthy elite,38,39 and continuing down the path we’re currently on will only make this disparity worse, not better.
The globalist plan isn’t about creating a better world for the average person, it’s about enslaving us so that we cannot reject or even resist what’s ultimately coming. Forced vaccinations are but one aspect of the plan that must be resisted at all cost.
Sources and References
Read more at articles.mercola.com *** Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-27--First Case Study Shows Zelenko Protocol Works

It took months of denials , an endorsement from President Trump , and many misrepresented studies , but a case study of Dr. Zelenko ’ s protocol has finally been published , and it shows he was right .
Published on ScienceDirect.com , the peer-reviewed study was the first to look at early , out of hospital treatment of COVID-19 with Zelenko ’ s protocol of Hydoxychloraquin , Zinc , and Azithromycin .
While other studies looked at the effects of Hydroxychloriquin alone , or treatment during the later stages of the COCID-19 infection , this is the first to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , including dosages and timetables .
The case study of 141 patients treated within four days of the onset of symptoms was done , using independent public reference data from 377 other confirmed COVID-19 patients of the same community who remained untreated as a “ control ” or reference .
Of the 141 treated patients , only four were hospitalized vs. 58 of the 377 who went untreated .
Of those treated , only one person died , while thirteen died in the untreated group .
The study concluded that “ Risk stratification-based @ @ @ @ @ @ @ possible after symptom onset with the used triple therapy , including the combination of zinc with low dose hydroxychloroquine , was associated with significantly fewer hospitalizations.
” The study also noted that there were no cardiac side effects noted from the treatment .
To read the complete study , Click Here Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

First Case Study Shows Zelenko Protocol Works
Written by CrownHeights.info
It took months of denials, an endorsement from President Trump, and many misrepresented studies, but a case study of Dr. Zelenko’s protocol has finally been published, and it shows he was right.
Published on ScienceDirect.com, the peer-reviewed study was the first to look at early, out of hospital treatment of COVID-19 with Zelenko’s protocol of Hydoxychloraquin, Zinc, and Azithromycin.
While other studies looked at the effects of Hydroxychloriquin alone, or treatment during the later stages of the COCID-19 infection, this is the first to look at Zelenko’s entire Protocol, including dosages and timetables.
The case study of 141 patients treated within four days of the onset of symptoms was done, using independent public reference data from 377 other confirmed COVID-19 patients of the same community who remained untreated as a “control” or reference.
Of the 141 treated patients, only four were hospitalized vs. 58 of the 377 who went untreated.
Of those treated, only one person died, while thirteen died in the untreated group.
The study concluded that “Risk stratification-based treatment of COVID-19 outpatients as early as possible after symptom onset with the used triple therapy, including the combination of zinc with low dose hydroxychloroquine, was associated with significantly fewer hospitalizations.”
The study also noted that there were no cardiac side effects noted from the treatment. To read the complete study, Click Here
More at crownheights.info
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-27--Denmark rushes through emergency coronavirus law

“ It is time to put aside party politics and be together to do what it takes to bring Denmark safely through this situation.
” Jens Elo Rytter , law professor at Copenhagen University , said the measures were unlike anything passed in the last 75 years “ It is certainly the most extreme since the Second World War , ” he told the Jyllands-Posten newspaper .
“ There have been some powerful encroachments in various terror packages .
But this goes further.
” Trine Maria Ilsøe , DR ’ s court correspondent , said that Danish citizens could face @ @ @ @ @ @ @ refused to comply with health authorities ’ demands .
“ It means that you could be sentenced to a punishment if you , for example , refuse to allow yourself to be tested for coronavirus , ” she said .
The Ministry of Health will now work with the Ministry of Justice on the details of how the police will work with health officials to enforce their demands .
As well as enforcing quarantine measures , the law also allows the authorities to force people to be vaccinated , even though there is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It also empowers them to prohibit access to public institutions , supermarkets and shops , public and private nursing homes and hospitals , and also to impose restrictions on access to public transport .
Initially , the government wanted to the law to give the police the right to enter private homes without a court order if there is a suspicion of coronavirus infection .
But this was dropped after opposition from parties in the parliament .
The parliamentary session was itself affected by the pandemic , with only 95 out of 179 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ made to ensure that MPs kept a safe distance from one another , and MPs voting by standing up .

“It is time to put aside party politics and be together to do what it takes to bring Denmark safely through this situation.”
Jens Elo Rytter, law professor at Copenhagen University, said the measures were unlike anything passed in the last 75 years “It is certainly the most extreme since the Second World War,” he told the Jyllands-Posten newspaper. “There have been some powerful encroachments in various terror packages. But this goes further.”
Trine Maria Ilsøe, DR’s court correspondent, said that Danish citizens could face prosecution under the new law if they refused to comply with health authorities’ demands. “It means that you could be sentenced to a punishment if you, for example, refuse to allow yourself to be tested for coronavirus,” she said.
The Ministry of Health will now work with the Ministry of Justice on the details of how the police will work with health officials to enforce their demands.
As well as enforcing quarantine measures, the law also allows the authorities to force people to be vaccinated, even though there is currently no vaccination for the virus.
It also empowers them to prohibit access to public institutions, supermarkets and shops, public and private nursing homes and hospitals, and also to impose restrictions on access to public transport.
Initially, the government wanted to the law to give the police the right to enter private homes without a court order if there is a suspicion of coronavirus infection. But this was dropped after opposition from parties in the parliament.
The parliamentary session was itself affected by the pandemic, with only 95 out of 179 MPs present for the vote, efforts made to ensure that MPs kept a safe distance from one another, and MPs voting by standing up.
Read more at www.thelocal.dk
***