principiascientificinternational--2020-10-09--A Half-Million Sharks To Be Killed for COVID-19 Vaccine

A Half-Million Sharks To Be Killed for COVID-19 Vaccine According to conservationists and wildlife experts , the plan to vaccinate the global population against COVID-19 will have a devastating environmental impact , as one of the vaccine ingredients , squalene , is made from shark liver oil .
To satisfy a global supply of squalene-containing vaccines , an estimated half-million sharks would have to be slaughtered .
At present , five COVID-19 vaccine candidates are using squalene as an adjuvant to boost the immune response to the vaccine and elicit higher antibody titers.1,2,3 Added to the more than 3 million @ @ @ @ @ @ @ year , the added demand could push certain shark species , such as gulper and basking sharks that are particularly rich in squalene , to the brink of extinction.4 According to the New Zealand Herald:5 The conservationist group Shark Allies6 has launched a Change.org petition7 calling for a ban on shark-derived squalene in COVID-19 vaccines .
As noted in the petition , which is addressed to several regulatory agencies around the world , including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration , the British Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency , the European Medicines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in China , as well as all vaccine makers:8 Shark Allies points out that shark liver squalene has no “ magical ” properties that can not be replaced by other , more sustainable botanical sources such as yeast , algae , olive oil , palm oil , amaranth oil and wheat germ oil.9,10 At least one company has developed a synthetic version of the adjuvant,11,12 made from fermented sugar cane rather than shark liver , but while that would safeguard sharks , it opens yet other questions surrounding safety .
No synthetic squalene @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but the Silicon Valley company Amryis , which has been producing synthetic squalene for the cosmetics industry , is now trying to get the product approved by the FDA for use in vaccines , and it ’ s already in negotiations with three vaccine makers.13 Squalene , a hydrocarbon oil , is used as an adjuvant in some vaccines .
One commonly used squalene-based adjuvant , MF59 , is an emulsion formulated with squalene , polysorbate 80 , sorbitan trioleate , trisodium citrate dehydrate , citric acid monohydrate and water.14 As noted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ components of the MF59 adjuvant are not immunostimulatory , but the emulsion is.
” The purpose of a vaccine adjuvant is to enhance ( turbo charge ) your immune response to the vaccine .
Adjuvants cause your immune system to overreact to the introduction of the organism you ’ re being vaccinated against .
As noted in the 2014 paper , “ MF59 as a Vaccine Adjuvant : A Review of Safety and Immunogenicity ” :16 As reported in “ Coronavirus Vaccine Will Bypass Safety Testing , ” squalene-containing H1N1 vaccines distributed in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were found to cause narcolepsy , a very rare and disabling neurological disorder characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness .
About 70 % of narcolepsy cases also involve cataplexy17 — the sudden loss of voluntary muscle control — along with vivid hallucinations and total paralysis at the beginning or end of the narcoleptic attack .
One of the H1N1 vaccines causatively linked to narcolepsy was GlaxoSmithKline ’ s Pandemrix vaccine , which was licensed by European government regulators and sold in a number of European countries ( but not in the U.S. ) .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ somnolence , ” although not narcolepsy per se , was a known potential side effect of the vaccine .
Thanks to the public pushback instigated by the National Vaccine Information Center ( NVIC ) , which opposed the fast-tracked licensure of squalene adjuvants in swine flu vaccines under the Emergency Use Authorization Act , none of the H1N1 vaccines distributed in the U.S. contained squalene .
The danger with allowing questionable vaccine ingredients to be used in emergency vaccines is that once it ’ s been used in one vaccine , vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccines without having to go through the rigorous approval process that would normally be required .
A squalene-containing vaccine for the U.S. market ended up being approved19 in 2013 , though , during the H5N1 bird flu pandemic .
It was the first adjuvanted influenza vaccine approved for the U.S. market , and it used the same problematic squalene adjuvant that was widely used in other countries during the 2009 swine flu pandemic .
In 2002 , researchers found20 military personnel exhibiting symptoms of Gulf War Syndrome had antibodies to squalene , sparking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ caused by squalene-containing anthrax vaccine .
An investigation revealed the problem was indeed limited to a specific batch of anthrax vaccine , one that contained squalene adjuvant , but subsequent investigators downplayed the link , as low titers of antisqualene antibodies were also detected in the blood of healthy individuals , and the titer levels didn ’ t change after they were injected with a squalene-adjuvanted vaccine.21 Other studies raising questions about squalene-adjuvanted vaccines include a 2001 meta-analysis22,23 of 20 clinical trials , which found MF59-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine ( Fluad ) had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine .
Over the course of three years , 1 % to 8 % of seniors who received MF59-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine experienced systemic adverse events , compared to zero to 7 % in the nonadjuvanted flu vaccine group .
“ MF59 as a Vaccine Adjuvant : A Review of Safety and Immunogenicity ” also notes that:24 While evidence is scarce , some studies have highlighted the possibility of squalene causing autoimmune problems such as arthritis and lupus when injected .
As noted in one 2004 study:25 Similarly , a 2000 study26 published @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a single injection of squalene into rats triggered “ chronic , immune-mediated joint-specific inflammation , ” i.e .
rheumatoid arthritis .
The researchers concluded their findings raise questions about the role of adjuvants in chronic inflammatory diseases .
A more recent study,27 published in 2017 , also reported that hydrocarbon oils such as squalene induce and enhance arthritis in genetically susceptible rats .
Injecting hydrocarbon oil adjuvants also resulted in : • The activation , proliferation and elevated expression of Th1 and Th17 cytokines by T cells “ which correlate with the arthritogenicity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the authors : Your Genetic Profile May Predispose You to Squalene Damage The authors of that 2017 study28 also address the issue of squalene adjuvants in vaccines , specifically , noting the use of vaccine adjuvants has been “ associated with the elevated production of cytokines such as IFN-γ and IL-17.
” The challenge vaccine makers face is to maximize immunogenicity ( the ability to provoke an immune response ) while minimizing reactogenicity ( the unwanted property of creating adverse reactions , especially immunological responses ) “ and the risk of developing any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disorders , such as narcolepsy or Gulf War syndrome , ” the researchers note .
They also point out that : Returning to where we started , with the issue of half a million sharks being culled for their liver oil now that several COVID-19 vaccine candidates are using squalene adjuvant , let ’ s hope an alternative is made available to prevent this massacre .
However , let ’ s not confuse this with the notion that botanical squalene might be safer .
While it would be noble to safeguard our shark @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of squalene adjuvant is unlikely to result in a safer vaccine .
Despite the mainstream narrative that the vaccine will save us from devastation , nothing could be further from the truth .
The purpose of a vaccine is to catalyze your immune system to produce a protective response .
The problem with the Warp Speed produced vaccine , with virtually all the safety stops removed , is that the risks far outweigh any benefits .
This is particularly true in light of the many well researched ways to improve immune function by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like time-restricted eating and avoiding all industrially processed seed oils , both of which will decrease insulin resistance and upregulate your immune response .
Vitamin D is another powerful synergistic therapy that will reduce your risk for COVID-19 far greater than any unproven vaccine that is a ticking time bomb with its squalene adjuvant and accelerated production schedule that eliminates years of important safety testing .
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

A Half-Million Sharks To Be Killed for COVID-19 Vaccine
Written by Dr. Joseph Mercola
According to conservationists and wildlife experts, the plan to vaccinate the global population against COVID-19 will have a devastating environmental impact, as one of the vaccine ingredients, squalene, is made from shark liver oil.
To satisfy a global supply of squalene-containing vaccines, an estimated half-million sharks would have to be slaughtered. At present, five COVID-19 vaccine candidates are using squalene as an adjuvant to boost the immune response to the vaccine and elicit higher antibody titers.1,2,3
Added to the more than 3 million sharks already killed for their livers each year, the added demand could push certain shark species, such as gulper and basking sharks that are particularly rich in squalene, to the brink of extinction.4 According to the New Zealand Herald:5
“British pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline uses shark squalene in its adjuvant, which is used in flu vaccines. In May, GSK said it would manufacture a billion doses of the adjuvant for potential use in COVID-19 vaccines.
About 3,000 sharks are required to make 1 ton of squalene. Estimates from California-based group Shark Allies suggest that immunizing everyone in the world with one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine containing squalene would require about 250,000 sharks, depending on the quantities used. This doubles to half a million if two doses are required, as researchers say is likely.”
Conservationists Call for Ban on Shark-Derived Squalene
The conservationist group Shark Allies6 has launched a Change.org petition7 calling for a ban on shark-derived squalene in COVID-19 vaccines. As noted in the petition, which is addressed to several regulatory agencies around the world, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the British Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, the European Medicines Agency and the National Medical Products Administration in China, as well as all vaccine makers:8
“The supply chain has never been tested at the scale that a coronavirus vaccine would demand. There is also very little quality control and transparency in the shark squalene industry. In a nutshell, exploiting sharks for a key vaccine ingredient that can be derived from more sustainable and reliable non-animal alternatives is a detrimental and destructive approach.”
Shark Allies points out that shark liver squalene has no “magical” properties that cannot be replaced by other, more sustainable botanical sources such as yeast, algae, olive oil, palm oil, amaranth oil and wheat germ oil.9,10
At least one company has developed a synthetic version of the adjuvant,11,12 made from fermented sugar cane rather than shark liver, but while that would safeguard sharks, it opens yet other questions surrounding safety.
No synthetic squalene is currently approved for use in vaccines, but the Silicon Valley company Amryis, which has been producing synthetic squalene for the cosmetics industry, is now trying to get the product approved by the FDA for use in vaccines, and it’s already in negotiations with three vaccine makers.13
What Is Squalene?
Squalene, a hydrocarbon oil, is used as an adjuvant in some vaccines. One commonly used squalene-based adjuvant, MF59, is an emulsion formulated with squalene, polysorbate 80, sorbitan trioleate, trisodium citrate dehydrate, citric acid monohydrate and water.14 As noted in a 2014 paper,15 “The individual components of the MF59 adjuvant are not immunostimulatory, but the emulsion is.”
The purpose of a vaccine adjuvant is to enhance (turbo charge) your immune response to the vaccine. Adjuvants cause your immune system to overreact to the introduction of the organism you’re being vaccinated against. As noted in the 2014 paper, “MF59 as a Vaccine Adjuvant: A Review of Safety and Immunogenicity”:16
“Its mechanism of action is not fully understood, but enhancement of the interaction between the antigen and the dendritic cell seems to be involved. When used with seasonal influenza vaccines, an increase occurs in the hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers against some, but not all, seasonal vaccine influenza strains …
Data suggest that MF59 exerts it immunostimulatory effect by engaging the muscle fibers and mononuclear cells to produce a local environment that is conducive to the attraction of effector cells and differentiation of monocytes to DCs [dendritic cells].”
Squalene-Based Flu Vaccines Linked to Narcolepsy
As reported in “Coronavirus Vaccine Will Bypass Safety Testing,” squalene-containing H1N1 vaccines distributed in Europe during the 2009 swine flu pandemic were found to cause narcolepsy, a very rare and disabling neurological disorder characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness.
About 70% of narcolepsy cases also involve cataplexy17 — the sudden loss of voluntary muscle control — along with vivid hallucinations and total paralysis at the beginning or end of the narcoleptic attack.
One of the H1N1 vaccines causatively linked to narcolepsy was GlaxoSmithKline’s Pandemrix vaccine, which was licensed by European government regulators and sold in a number of European countries (but not in the U.S.). The Pandemrix package insert18 actually stated that “somnolence,” although not narcolepsy per se, was a known potential side effect of the vaccine.
Thanks to the public pushback instigated by the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), which opposed the fast-tracked licensure of squalene adjuvants in swine flu vaccines under the Emergency Use Authorization Act, none of the H1N1 vaccines distributed in the U.S. contained squalene.
The danger with allowing questionable vaccine ingredients to be used in emergency vaccines is that once it’s been used in one vaccine, vaccine makers can then use it in other vaccines without having to go through the rigorous approval process that would normally be required.
A squalene-containing vaccine for the U.S. market ended up being approved19 in 2013, though, during the H5N1 bird flu pandemic. It was the first adjuvanted influenza vaccine approved for the U.S. market, and it used the same problematic squalene adjuvant that was widely used in other countries during the 2009 swine flu pandemic.
Potential Safety Problems
In 2002, researchers found20 military personnel exhibiting symptoms of Gulf War Syndrome had antibodies to squalene, sparking concerns that the mysterious condition might be caused by squalene-containing anthrax vaccine.
An investigation revealed the problem was indeed limited to a specific batch of anthrax vaccine, one that contained squalene adjuvant, but subsequent investigators downplayed the link, as low titers of antisqualene antibodies were also detected in the blood of healthy individuals, and the titer levels didn’t change after they were injected with a squalene-adjuvanted vaccine.21
Other studies raising questions about squalene-adjuvanted vaccines include a 2001 meta-analysis22,23 of 20 clinical trials, which found MF59-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine (Fluad) had a riskier safety profile than nonadjuvanted flu vaccine.
Over the course of three years, 1% to 8% of seniors who received MF59-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine experienced systemic adverse events, compared to zero to 7% in the nonadjuvanted flu vaccine group. “MF59 as a Vaccine Adjuvant: A Review of Safety and Immunogenicity” also notes that:24
“In 2009, Pellegrini et al. published an analysis that encompassed the aforementioned 20 trials in addition to 44 other trials. These were heterogeneously designed trials in terms of age group (infant to elderly), study design (controlled and uncontrolled), duration of observation (3 weeks to >12 months) and the antigen used (pandemic or interpandemic influenza).
These trials included 20,749 subjects who received at least one dose of MF59-adjuvanted vaccine, and 7,526 subjects who received nonadjuvanted influenza vaccine.
Subjects who received MF59-adjuvanted vaccine were more likely to develop local reactions such as pain, erythema, induration and warmth (risk ratio [RR] of 1.71), and systemic reactions including myalgia, fatigue, headaches and malaise (RR: 1.33) in the first 3 days post-vaccination, when compared to those who received nonadjuvanted vaccines.”
Squalene Linked to Autoimmunity
While evidence is scarce, some studies have highlighted the possibility of squalene causing autoimmune problems such as arthritis and lupus when injected. As noted in one 2004 study:25
“Adjuvant oils such as … squalene (MF59) have been used in human and veterinary vaccines despite poor understanding of their mechanisms of action. Several reports suggest an association of vaccination and various autoimmune diseases, however, few were confirmed epidemiologically …
We have reported that a single intraperitoneal injection of the adjuvant … squalene induces lupus-related autoantibodies to nRNP/Sm and -Su in non-autoimmune BALB/c mice.
Induction of these autoantibodies appeared to be associated with the hydrocarbon’s ability to induce IL-12, IL-6, and TNF-α, suggesting a relationship with hydrocarbon’s adjuvanticity. Whether this is relevant in human vaccination is a difficult issue due to the complex effects of vaccines and the fact that immunotoxicological effects vary depending on species, route, dose, and duration of administration.
Nevertheless, the potential of adjuvant hydrocarbon oils to induce autoimmunity has implications in the use of oil adjuvants in human and veterinary vaccines as well as basic research.”
Squalene Linked to Rheumatoid Arthritis
Similarly, a 2000 study26 published in the American Journal of Pathology demonstrated a single injection of squalene into rats triggered “chronic, immune-mediated joint-specific inflammation,” i.e. rheumatoid arthritis. The researchers concluded their findings raise questions about the role of adjuvants in chronic inflammatory diseases.
The arthritogenicity of hydrocarbon oils is associated with their adjuvant properties with implications to not only arthritis research but also other diseases and medical applications such as vaccines in which oil adjuvants are involved. ~ Scientific Reports 2017
A more recent study,27 published in 2017, also reported that hydrocarbon oils such as squalene induce and enhance arthritis in genetically susceptible rats. Injecting hydrocarbon oil adjuvants also resulted in:
The activation, proliferation and elevated expression of Th1 and Th17 cytokines by T cells “which correlate with the arthritogenicity of the T cells”
Increased production of autoantibodies against cartilage joint specific, type II collagen epitopes
According to the authors:
“This study shows the arthritogenicity of hydrocarbon oils is associated with their adjuvant properties with implications to not only arthritis research but also other diseases and medical applications such as vaccines in which oil adjuvants are involved …
Within 1 hour after injection, the injected adjuvants spread rapidly and reached different organs with high selectivity for lymph nodes and rather few oil droplets were distributed to joints.
At the lymph nodes, oil adjuvants lead to both local and systemic reaction including hyperplasia and an increased level of acute phase protein such as α1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) in the blood … We showed that … T cells in vivo primed with … adjuvants such as hexadecane and squalene can also transfer arthritis.”
Your Genetic Profile May Predispose You to Squalene Damage
The authors of that 2017 study28 also address the issue of squalene adjuvants in vaccines, specifically, noting the use of vaccine adjuvants has been “associated with the elevated production of cytokines such as IFN-γ and IL-17.”
The challenge vaccine makers face is to maximize immunogenicity (the ability to provoke an immune response) while minimizing reactogenicity (the unwanted property of creating adverse reactions, especially immunological responses) “and the risk of developing any ‘adjuvant-induced’ autoimmune or chronic degenerative disorders, such as narcolepsy or Gulf War syndrome,” the researchers note. They also point out that:
“It is known that oil adjuvants induce tissue damage and cell death at the injection site leading to the production of damage-associated-molecular patterns (DAMPs) and inflammasome activation. Here we demonstrated that different adjuvants exert different extent of boosting effect on antigen-specific recall response and antibody production.
The fact that adjuvants induce arthritis only in genetically susceptible strains and autoimmune disorders occurring only in genetically susceptible individuals shows adjuvant induction of autoimmune diseases is partly determined by genetic factors.
In future, it will be beneficial to investigate if these genetic factors, some of which have been identified by animal studies in our group, also determine whether particular individuals with certain genetic profiles carry a higher risk of developing any adverse reactions upon adjuvant-based vaccination.”
Returning to where we started, with the issue of half a million sharks being culled for their liver oil now that several COVID-19 vaccine candidates are using squalene adjuvant, let’s hope an alternative is made available to prevent this massacre.
However, let’s not confuse this with the notion that botanical squalene might be safer. While it would be noble to safeguard our shark stocks, switching to a botanical source of squalene adjuvant is unlikely to result in a safer vaccine.
Bottom Line
Despite the mainstream narrative that the vaccine will save us from devastation, nothing could be further from the truth. The purpose of a vaccine is to catalyze your immune system to produce a protective response. The problem with the Warp Speed produced vaccine, with virtually all the safety stops removed, is that the risks far outweigh any benefits.
This is particularly true in light of the many well researched ways to improve immune function by improving your metabolic health using simple strategies like time-restricted eating and avoiding all industrially processed seed oils, both of which will decrease insulin resistance and upregulate your immune response.
Vitamin D is another powerful synergistic therapy that will reduce your risk for COVID-19 far greater than any unproven vaccine that is a ticking time bomb with its squalene adjuvant and accelerated production schedule that eliminates years of important safety testing.
Read more at articles.mercola.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-10--From October 8th UK Government Quietly Combines Flu & COVID Reports

If ever there was an opportune moment to claim that the alarmist official narrative was unraveling in Britain then you need look no further than the latest step by Public Health England .
The government body has officially begun combining the reporting of COVID19 with seasonal influenza as of October 08 , 2020 ( see screenshot , above ) .
What does this mean ?
On it ’ s face this step demonstrates the further downgrading of the claimed seriousness of the SARS-COV2 virus as a public health threat .
By lumping both sets of weekly data reports together we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ longer sufficient medical , scientific or data difference between these supposedly distinct pathogens .
Once the gravity of this step sinks in more widely , Principia Scientific International will be reporting on the expert opinions of epidemiologists , etc , as to where this leads us in terms of legal remedies – such as filing of a judicial review – to compel the government to rescind entirely any and all ’ emergency ’ measures restrictive on normal freedoms .
But at this stage it is suffice to say that this ‘ backdoor ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are witnessing government incompetence and/or duplicity of the worst kind .
This latest outrage mirrors precisely how the status of the disease was downgraded as a ‘ High consequence infectious diseases ( HCID ) ’ on March 19 , 2020 , the week BEFORE Britain went into a national ‘ lockdown ’ to fight what we are still being told is a deadly virus ( it wasn ’ t then in March , it is even less so now ) .
With input from our growing number of expert contributors , we were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ PCR Test Is Key To The Pandemic Fraud.
’ Moreover , readers may recall how astute independent statistical analysis last month exposed ‘ The UK Government ’ s Outright Lies To The People ‘ ( September 25 , 2020 ) .
We asked professional statistician Andrew Mather to show us just how the data was rigged by smug UK Chief Scientific Officer Sir Patrick Vallance ( photo , right ) .
We showed in detail with articles such as ‘ Coronavirus Cases Plummet When PCR Tests Are Adjusted ‘ just how the UK @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outright to the British people , yet again massively exaggerating the threat ( even disregarding that there are no matching deaths for cases ) and no one in the mainstream media notices and calls them on it .
Mortality from COVID19 is statistically proven to be within the margins usually associated with any normal seasonal influenza .
In fact , more researchers are showing COVID-19 may not be infectious at all ; and witness how the media assists in the conspiracy of lies , see : The Focus on ‘ Cases , ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Such revelations succeeded in inspiring mass public protests and a petitioning of Parliament last week , as we reported in UK Petition to Government Against Use of False Covid-19 Test Data .
Principia Scientific International ’ s long time friend and consultant , Piers Corbyn ( brother of former UK Labour Party Leader , Jeremy ) was arrested to become one of the very few people to face a £10,000 fine for daring to exercise his civil rights .
The evidence is growing and on our side .
Mather ’ s analysis and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ before a court in any civil or criminal proceedings against government ministers and their advisors .
Likewise , adding to Mather ’ s analyses , is that of our own anonymous contact , a former senior government scientist , who ‘ Exposes COVID19 Hospital Beds Scam ’ and is so angered by the fraudulent and criminal misuse of the numbers that he lamented : If anything , the pandemic appears to have served as a means for the rich to get even richer ( ‘ Billionaires See Fortunes Rise By 27 percent During @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in profits for Big Pharma ( and corrupt government ‘ experts ‘ and advisory agencies ) will accrue once the mandatory vaccine is forced upon us all ( but not the wealthy or politically connected ) .
Such longstanding conflicts of interests ably called out time and again by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Thankfully , the flood gates are opening and more front line medical professionals are demanding an end to the pandemic fraud which is causing many thousands more non-Covid deaths than the virus .
In less than a week since launch @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consciousness , as we reported in Over 7,000 Scientists & Doctors Call For End To The Lockdowns .
Our mission is to press harder than ever to persuade those elected officials with whom we have direct contact to urge they speak out and play a full part in helping put a stop to the biggest medical fraud of all time .
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 About the author : John O ’ Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder ( with Dr Tim Ball @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) .
John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert , Michael ‘ hockey stick ’ Mann in the ‘ science trial of the century ‘ .
O ’ Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘ Slayers ’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world ’ s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

From October 8th UK Government Quietly Combines Flu & COVID Reports
Written by John O'Sullivan
If ever there was an opportune moment to claim that the alarmist official narrative was unraveling in Britain then you need look no further than the latest step by Public Health England. The government body has officially begun combining the reporting of COVID19 with seasonal influenza as of October 08, 2020 (see here and screenshot, above).
What does this mean?
On it’s face this step demonstrates the further downgrading of the claimed seriousness of the SARS-COV2 virus as a public health threat. By lumping both sets of weekly data reports together we must reasonably conclude that there is no longer sufficient medical, scientific or data difference between these supposedly distinct pathogens.
View the above report at: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Once the gravity of this step sinks in more widely, Principia Scientific International will be reporting on the expert opinions of epidemiologists, etc, as to where this leads us in terms of legal remedies – such as filing of a judicial review – to compel the government to rescind entirely any and all ’emergency’ measures restrictive on normal freedoms.
But at this stage it is suffice to say that this ‘backdoor’ move reinforces our considered view that we are witnessing government incompetence and/or duplicity of the worst kind. This latest outrage mirrors precisely how the status of the disease was downgraded as a ‘High consequence infectious diseases (HCID)’ on March 19, 2020, the week BEFORE Britain went into a national ‘lockdown’ to fight what we are still being told is a deadly virus (it wasn’t then in March, it is even less so now).
With input from our growing number of expert contributors, we were able to deduce that ‘The COVID-19 PCR Test Is Key To The Pandemic Fraud.’
Moreover, readers may recall how astute independent statistical analysis last month exposed ‘The UK Government’s Outright Lies To The People‘ (September 25, 2020). We asked professional statistician Andrew Mather to show us just how the data was rigged by smug UK Chief Scientific Officer Sir Patrick Vallance (photo, right).
We showed in detail with articles such as ‘Coronavirus Cases Plummet When PCR Tests Are Adjusted‘ just how the UK Government’s Chief Scientific Officer lied outright to the British people, yet again massively exaggerating the threat (even disregarding that there are no matching deaths for cases) and no one in the mainstream media notices and calls them on it.
Mortality from COVID19 is statistically proven to be within the margins usually associated with any normal seasonal influenza. In fact, more researchers are showing COVID-19 may not be infectious at all; and witness how the media assists in the conspiracy of lies, see: The Focus on ‘Cases,’ Not COVID Deaths is a Trick.
Such revelations succeeded in inspiring mass public protests and a petitioning of Parliament last week, as we reported in UK Petition to Government Against Use of False Covid-19 Test Data. Principia Scientific International’s long time friend and consultant, Piers Corbyn (brother of former UK Labour Party Leader, Jeremy) was arrested to become one of the very few people to face a £10,000 fine for daring to exercise his civil rights.
The evidence is growing and on our side. Mather’s analysis and conclusion was damning and should be put before a court in any civil or criminal proceedings against government ministers and their advisors. Likewise, adding to Mather’s analyses, is that of our own anonymous contact, a former senior government scientist, who ‘Exposes COVID19 Hospital Beds Scam’and is so angered by the fraudulent and criminal misuse of the numbers that he lamented:
“The critical issue here is that we’ve abandoned traditional methods of diagnosis by an admitting physician (what we call differential diagnosis in the trade) and replaced this by an automated numbers generator with the controversial RT-PCR test in the driving seat – and all because the WHO say so. This is no longer clinical diagnosis as I used to know it.”
If anything, the pandemic appears to have served as a means for the rich to get even richer (‘Billionaires See Fortunes Rise By 27 percent During The Pandemic‘) and more billions in profits for Big Pharma (and corrupt government ‘experts‘ and advisory agencies) will accrue once the mandatory vaccine is forced upon us all (but not the wealthy or politically connected). Such longstanding conflicts of interests ably called out time and again by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Thankfully, the flood gates are opening and more front line medical professionals are demanding an end to the pandemic fraud which is causing many thousands more non-Covid deaths than the virus. In less than a week since launch a new petition has captured the public consciousness, as we reported in Over 7,000 Scientists & Doctors Call For End To The Lockdowns.
Our mission is to press harder than ever to persuade those elected officials with whom we have direct contact to urge they speak out and play a full part in helping put a stop to the biggest medical fraud of all time.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
About the author: John O’Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI). John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-10--California Doctor Treated over 1700 COVID Patients with ZERO Deaths

California Doctor Treated over 1700 COVID Patients with ZERO Deaths While the media continues pushing hype around the coronavirus , actual medical experts say we already have the tools we need to combat the virus .
One America ’ s Pearson Sharp spoke with Brian Tyson , a doctor in Southern California who has successfully treated over 1,700 patients with the drug hydroxychloroquine .
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 About the author : John O ’ Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder ( with Dr Tim Ball ) of Principia Scientific @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert , Michael ‘ hockey stick ’ Mann in the ‘ science trial of the century ‘ .
O ’ Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘ Slayers ’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world ’ s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

California Doctor Treated over 1700 COVID Patients with ZERO Deaths
Written by John O'Sullivan
While the media continues pushing hype around the coronavirus, actual medical experts say we already have the tools we need to combat the virus. One America’s Pearson Sharp spoke with Brian Tyson, a doctor in Southern California who has successfully treated over 1,700 patients with the drug hydroxychloroquine.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
About the author: John O’Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI). John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-11--Now Doctor Starts Covid19 Rebellion in Ireland

This second generation emigrant son of Ireland is proud to report that the rebels are stirring in the Emerald Isle .
An uprising is simmering after a medical doctor was removed from his public position for daring to criticize the government ’ s draconian lockdown measures in an impassioned speech to protesters in Dublin .
As reported in the limerickleader.ie Dr Patrick Morrissey , who operates a clinic in Adare , has become a public campaigner exposing the extreme and medically-unproven measures .
For those readers keeping count , today is Day 210 of “ 15 Days to Slow The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ expert medical opinion Dr Morrissey was swiftly removed as chairman and director of his local medical body .
Dr Patrick Morrissey , who operates a clinic in Adare , told the Limerick Leader that a meeting of the Shannondoc board on Monday night concluded that he was to be removed from the board as chairman and director .
In a lengthy speech that was widely circulated on social media , Dr Morrissey said that the National Public Health Emergency Team [ Nphet ] was “ completely out of touch ” and it “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ long list of claims at the rally , hosted by the so-called Yellow Vest movement , he said that Nphet “ believe your health is determined by a stupid swab result ” and that it is “ meaningless data being used to subdue the people ” .
“ We must take back our country and our freedoms from these megalomaniac bureaucrats , ” he told a cheering crowd .
He told the Leader that evidence has mounted up to show that “ we are practically at the level of herd immunity now ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic is “ by any reasonable definition no longer a health emergency ” as it kills people with an average age of 84 and that 90 % of deaths are in over-65s .
When asked about this view , Dr Morrissey said : “ People die every day .
I was at the bedside of a patient who died yesterday .
I see death all the time .
People are abstracted .
People don ’ t understand they ’ ve got a death phobia .
Death is part of life .
And the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s fear of death—irrational fear of death—as a hammer to beat them.
” Dr Morrissey said on Tuesday he has treated around 60 patients , both at his clinic and at a Covid hub during the pandemic .
He said “ in defiance of guidelines from the HSE ” , he has treated patients with hydroxychloroquine , zinc , Vitamin D and azithromycin .
During the rally , he hit out at Nphet , stating that their definition of health meant “ zero Covid ” .
“ I would argue that health is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ team from the stands .
Health is getting married in and celebrating with those you love .
Health is looking out on a sea of smiling maskless faces , ” he said .
Asked if he was anti-mask , the Limerick GP said : “ I am against mandatory masks in lower risk settings .
So in clinical settings , I have no problem with masks .
In places where there is unavoidable close contact over 15 minutes , I am okay with masks.
” “ We must stop the Government ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fought freedoms .
It suits them not to give them back .
We went along with the Government strategy in March when we saw the chaotic scenes in Spain and Italy .
“ Now we know so much more .
The curve has been well and truly flattened .
The current measures are way more damaging to health than the risk of Covid they pretend to be protecting us from.
” “ Every day I see the negative physical and psychological fallout of these continuing restrictions .
NPHET as it currently stands should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to treat high risk patients in the community .
This way we can keep more of them out of hospital .
The daily case numbers must stop being pushed by the media on a people suffering more from Covid fatigue than Covid.
” Asked if it was fair that he was removed from his position at Shannondoc , Dr Morrissey said : “ I think it ’ s a sad indictment of a country that we live in and the time we live in , that things are so polarised and there isn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and that I would be penalised because of that .
But I respect the board ’ s integrity and they have made a judgement.
” A spokesperson for Shannondoc said that Dr Morrissey “ is no longer its chairperson or a member of the board .
“ We wish to thank Dr Morrissey for his significant contribution to the development of the cooperative during his tenure .
We will embark on the process of appointing Dr Morrissey ’ s successor with immediate effect .
”

Written by John O'Sullivan
This second generation emigrant son of Ireland is proud to report that the rebels are stirring in the Emerald Isle. An uprising is simmering after a medical doctor was removed from his public position for daring to criticize the government’s draconian lockdown measures in an impassioned speech to protesters in Dublin.
As reported in the limerickleader.ie Dr Patrick Morrissey, who operates a clinic in Adare, has become a public campaigner exposing the extreme and medically-unproven measures. For those readers keeping count, today is Day 210 of “15 Days to Slow The Spread.”
For daring to express his expert medical opinion Dr Morrissey was swiftly removed as chairman and director of his local medical body.
The Limerick Leader reports:
Dr Patrick Morrissey, who operates a clinic in Adare, told the Limerick Leader that a meeting of the Shannondoc board on Monday night concluded that he was to be removed from the board as chairman and director.
In a lengthy speech that was widely circulated on social media, Dr Morrissey said that the National Public Health Emergency Team [Nphet] was “completely out of touch” and it “should be scrapped”.
In a long list of claims at the rally, hosted by the so-called Yellow Vest movement, he said that Nphet “believe your health is determined by a stupid swab result” and that it is “meaningless data being used to subdue the people”.
“We must take back our country and our freedoms from these megalomaniac bureaucrats,” he told a cheering crowd.
He told the Leader that evidence has mounted up to show that “we are practically at the level of herd immunity now”.
He told the rally that the pandemic is “by any reasonable definition no longer a health emergency” as it kills people with an average age of 84 and that 90% of deaths are in over-65s.
When asked about this view, Dr Morrissey said: “People die every day. I was at the bedside of a patient who died yesterday. I see death all the time. People are abstracted. People don’t understand they’ve got a death phobia. Death is part of life. And the Government and Nphet are using people’s fear of death—irrational fear of death—as a hammer to beat them.”
Dr Morrissey said on Tuesday he has treated around 60 patients, both at his clinic and at a Covid hub during the pandemic. He said “in defiance of guidelines from the HSE”, he has treated patients with hydroxychloroquine, zinc, Vitamin D and azithromycin.
During the rally, he hit out at Nphet, stating that their definition of health meant “zero Covid”.
“I would argue that health is playing a match or cheering on your team from the stands. Health is getting married in and celebrating with those you love. Health is looking out on a sea of smiling maskless faces,” he said.
Asked if he was anti-mask, the Limerick GP said: “I am against mandatory masks in lower risk settings. So in clinical settings, I have no problem with masks. In places where there is unavoidable close contact over 15 minutes, I am okay with masks.”
“We must stop the Government’s heavy handedness and suppression of our hard fought freedoms. It suits them not to give them back. We went along with the Government strategy in March when we saw the chaotic scenes in Spain and Italy.
“Now we know so much more. The curve has been well and truly flattened. The current measures are way more damaging to health than the risk of Covid they pretend to be protecting us from.”
“Every day I see the negative physical and psychological fallout of these continuing restrictions. NPHET as it currently stands should be scrapped. Doctors should be allowed to treat high risk patients in the community. This way we can keep more of them out of hospital. The daily case numbers must stop being pushed by the media on a people suffering more from Covid fatigue than Covid.”
Asked if it was fair that he was removed from his position at Shannondoc, Dr Morrissey said: “I think it’s a sad indictment of a country that we live in and the time we live in, that things are so polarised and there isn’t room for free speech, and that I would be penalised because of that. But I respect the board’s integrity and they have made a judgement.”
A spokesperson for Shannondoc said that Dr Morrissey “is no longer its chairperson or a member of the board.
“We wish to thank Dr Morrissey for his significant contribution to the development of the cooperative during his tenure. We will embark on the process of appointing Dr Morrissey’s successor with immediate effect.”


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-11--Medical Chief: Face masks can increase risk of infection

Members of the public could be putting themselves more at risk from contracting coronavirus by wearing face masks , one of England ’ s most senior doctors has warned .
Jenny Harries , deputy chief medical officer , said the masks could “ actually trap the virus ” and cause the person wearing it to breathe it in .
“ For the average member of the public walking down a street , it is not a good idea ” to wear a face mask in the hope of preventing infection , she added .
Sales of the masks have sky-rocketed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ retailers including Boots and Amazon selling out of the products before the virus had even taken hold in the UK .
Asked about their effectiveness , Dr Harries told BBC News : “ What tends to happen is people will have one mask .
They won ’ t wear it all the time , they will take it off when they get home , they will put it down on a surface they haven ’ t cleaned .
“ Or they will be out and they haven ’ t washed their hands , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ somewhere , they half hook it off , they wipe something over it .
“ In fact , you can actually trap the virus in the mask and start breathing it in.
” Asked if people are putting themselves more at risk by wearing masks , Dr Harries added : “ Because of these behavioural issues , people can adversely put themselves at more risk than less.
” very little evidence of a widespread benefit ” from wearing them .
But Jake Dunning , head of emerging infections and zoonoses [ infectious disease @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Public Health England , told The Independent there was “ from wearing them .
“ Face masks must be worn correctly , changed frequently , removed properly , disposed of safely and used in combination with good universal hygiene behaviour in order for them to be effective , ” he added .
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .
However , she said those who are advised to wear one by healthcare workers should follow their guidance .
Demand for face masks in China , where the coronavirus outbreak began , exceeded 200 million a day in January , prompting manufacturers to cancel staff leave and increase wages to ramp up production .

Medical Chief: Face masks can increase risk of infection
Written by Chris Baynes
Members of the public could be putting themselves more at risk from contracting coronavirus by wearing face masks , one of England’s most senior doctors has warned. Jenny Harries, deputy chief medical officer, said the masks could “actually trap the virus” and cause the person wearing it to breathe it in.
“For the average member of the public walking down a street, it is not a good idea” to wear a face mask in the hope of preventing infection, she added.
Sales of the masks have sky-rocketed since the Covid-19 outbreak began, with retailers including Boots and Amazon selling out of the products before the virus had even taken hold in the UK.
Asked about their effectiveness, Dr Harries told BBC News: “What tends to happen is people will have one mask. They won’t wear it all the time, they will take it off when they get home, they will put it down on a surface they haven’t cleaned.
“Or they will be out and they haven’t washed their hands, they will have a cup of coffee somewhere, they half hook it off, they wipe something over it. “In fact, you can actually trap the virus in the mask and start breathing it in.” Asked if people are putting themselves more at risk by wearing masks, Dr Harries added: “Because of these behavioural issues, people can adversely put themselves at more risk than less.” very little evidence of a widespread benefit” from wearing them. But Jake Dunning, head of emerging infections and zoonoses [infectious disease spread between humans and animals] at Public Health England, told The Independent there was “from wearing them. “Face masks must be worn correctly, changed frequently, removed properly, disposed of safely and used in combination with good universal hygiene behaviour in order for them to be effective,” he added. Read more at www.independent.co.uk **** Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method. However, she said those who are advised to wear one by healthcare workers should follow their guidance. Demand for face masks in China, where the coronavirus outbreak began, exceeded 200 million a day in January, prompting manufacturers to cancel staff leave and increase wages to ramp up production.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-11--World Health Organization Slams Lockdowns for ‘Doubling’ Global Poverty

The UK ’ s envoy to the World Health Organisation ( W.H.O . )
has condemned mass coronavirus lockdowns , slamming the “ ghastly global catastrophe ” caused by crashing the world economy .
Dr. David Nabarro from the W.H.O .
appealed to world leaders on Saturday , telling them to stop “ using lockdowns as your primary control method ” of the coronavirus .
He claimed that the only thing lockdowns achieved was poverty – with no mention of the potential lives saved .
This is in direct contrast to W.H.O .
chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus who as far @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to lockdowns , and even warned against lifting them too soon , as Breitbart News reported .
Then in August , Tedros praised several national governments including the UK , France , South Korea and Germany for “ using all the tools at their disposal to tackle any new spikes ” which included regional lockdowns .
Speaking to Andrew Neil of the Spectator magazine , Dr. Nabarro bemoaned the collapse of the international tourism industry and claimed there would be a “ doubling ” in the levels of world poverty and child malnutrition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ make “ poor people an awful lot poorer.
” “ I want to say it again : We in the World Health Organisation do not advocate lockdowns as a primary means of controlling this virus , ” Dr. Nabarro said .
Instead , Dr. Nabarro is advocating for a new approach to containing the virus .
“ And so , we really do appeal to all world leaders : stop using lockdown as your primary control method .
Develop better systems for doing it .
Work together and learn from each other.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hours of another W.H.O .
recommendation for countries to avoid lockdowns because of their inherent damage to a range of national factors .
The W.H.O.
’ s top emergencies expert said on Friday that authorities should try to avoid “ punishing ” lockdowns , echoing claims from the Chinese city of Wuhan , where the virus was first identified , that the cure was worse than the malady .
Mike Ryan was speaking at a briefing in Geneva , the day after the W.H.O .
reported a record one-day increase in global coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 338,779 in 24 hours led by a surge of infections in Europe , as Reuters reports .
“ What we want to try to avoid – and sometimes it ’ s unavoidable and we accept that – but what we want to try and avoid is these massive lockdowns that are so punishing to communities , to society and to everything else , ” he said .
The alternative is for everyone to get on with their lives while taking due personal precautions as those at much greater risk from coronavirus , such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , are shielded .
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

World Health Organization Slams Lockdowns for ‘Doubling’ Global Poverty
Written by Simon Kent
The UK’s envoy to the World Health Organisation (W.H.O.) has condemned mass coronavirus lockdowns, slamming the “ghastly global catastrophe” caused by crashing the world economy.
Dr. David Nabarro from the W.H.O. appealed to world leaders on Saturday, telling them to stop “using lockdowns as your primary control method” of the coronavirus.
He claimed that the only thing lockdowns achieved was poverty – with no mention of the potential lives saved.
This is in direct contrast to W.H.O. chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus who as far back as April gave his full support to lockdowns, and even warned against lifting them too soon, as Breitbart News reported.
Then in August, Tedros praised several national governments including the UK, France, South Korea and Germany for “using all the tools at their disposal to tackle any new spikes” which included regional lockdowns.
Speaking to Andrew Neil of the Spectator magazine, Dr. Nabarro bemoaned the collapse of the international tourism industry and claimed there would be a “doubling” in the levels of world poverty and child malnutrition by 2021 as he warned that lockdowns make “poor people an awful lot poorer.”
“I want to say it again: We in the World Health Organisation do not advocate lockdowns as a primary means of controlling this virus,” Dr. Nabarro said.
Instead, Dr. Nabarro is advocating for a new approach to containing the virus.
“And so, we really do appeal to all world leaders: stop using lockdown as your primary control method. Develop better systems for doing it. Work together and learn from each other.”
Dr. Nabarro’s interview came within hours of another W.H.O. recommendation for countries to avoid lockdowns because of their inherent damage to a range of national factors.
The W.H.O.’s top emergencies expert said on Friday that authorities should try to avoid “punishing” lockdowns, echoing claims from the Chinese city of Wuhan, where the virus was first identified, that the cure was worse than the malady.
Mike Ryan was speaking at a briefing in Geneva, the day after the W.H.O. reported a record one-day increase in global coronavirus cases, with the total rising by 338,779 in 24 hours led by a surge of infections in Europe, as Reuters reports.
“What we want to try to avoid – and sometimes it’s unavoidable and we accept that – but what we want to try and avoid is these massive lockdowns that are so punishing to communities, to society and to everything else,” he said.
The alternative is for everyone to get on with their lives while taking due personal precautions as those at much greater risk from coronavirus, such as the elderly and the long-term sick, are shielded.
Read more at www.breitbart.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-11--Even CDC Now Admits No ‘Gold Standard’ of COVID19 Virus Isolate

The key phrase there is : “ Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available… ” Every object that exists can be quantified , which is to say , measured .
The use of the term “ quantified ” in that phrase means : the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus , because it is unavailable .
THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS .
A further tip-off is the use of the word ‘ isolates.
” This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE .
Another way to put it : NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN @ @ @ @ @ @ @ HAS ISOLATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS .
THEREFORE , NO ONE HAS PROVED THAT IT EXISTS .
As if this were not enough of a revelation to shock the world , the CDC goes on to say they are presenting a diagnostic PCR test to detect the virus-that-hasn ’ t-been-isolated…and the test is looking for RNA which is PRESUMED to come from the virus that hasn ’ t been proved to exist .
And using this test , the CDC and every other public health agency in the world are counting COVID cases and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ devastation using those case and death numbers as justification .
If people believe “ you have the virus but it is not available , ” and you have the virus except it is buried within other material and hasn ’ t been extracted and purified and isolated , these people believe the moon is made of green cheese .
This is like saying .
“ We have the 20 trillion dollars , they are contained somewhere in our myriad accounts , we just don ’ t know where.
” If you don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t know you have the money .
“ The car keys are somewhere in the house .
We just don ’ t where.
” Really ?
If you don ’ t know where , you don ’ t know the keys are in the house .
“ The missing cruise missile is somewhere in the arsenal , we just don ’ t where.
” No .
If you don ’ t know where , you don ’ t know the missile is in the arsenal .
“ The COVID-19 virus is somewhere in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t removed it from that material .
But we know what it is and we ’ ve identified it and we know its structure.
” NO YOU DON ’ T .
YOU ASSUME THAT .
“ But…but…there is a study which says a few researchers in a lab isolated the virus… ” They say they did .
But in July , the CDC is saying no virus is available .
I guess that means trucks were not available to bring the virus from that lab to the CDC .
The trucks were out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The bridge was washed out .
The trucks were in the shop .
Joe , the driver , couldn ’ t find his mask , and he didn ’ t want to leave home without it… Science is not assumptions.The pandemic is a fraud , down to the root of the poisonous tree .
”

The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…”
Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means: the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.
A further tip-off is the use of the word ‘isolates.” This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE.
Another way to put it:
NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS.
NO ONE HAS ISOLATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS.
THEREFORE, NO ONE HAS PROVED THAT IT EXISTS.
As if this were not enough of a revelation to shock the world, the CDC goes on to say they are presenting a diagnostic PCR test to detect the virus-that-hasn’t-been-isolated…and the test is looking for RNA which is PRESUMED to come from the virus that hasn’t been proved to exist.
And using this test, the CDC and every other public health agency in the world are counting COVID cases and deaths…and governments have instituted lockdowns and economic devastation using those case and death numbers as justification.
If people believe “you have the virus but it is not available,” and you have the virus except it is buried within other material and hasn’t been extracted and purified and isolated, these people believe the moon is made of green cheese.
This is like saying. “We have the 20 trillion dollars, they are contained somewhere in our myriad accounts, we just don’t know where.” If you don’t know where, you don’t know you have the money.
“The car keys are somewhere in the house. We just don’t where.” Really? If you don’t know where, you don’t know the keys are in the house.
“The missing cruise missile is somewhere in the arsenal, we just don’t where.” No. If you don’t know where, you don’t know the missile is in the arsenal.
“The COVID-19 virus is somewhere in the material we have—we just haven’t removed it from that material. But we know what it is and we’ve identified it and we know its structure.” NO YOU DON’T. YOU ASSUME THAT.
Science is not assumptions.
“But…but…there is a study which says a few researchers in a lab isolated the virus…”
They say they did. But in July, the CDC is saying no virus is available. I guess that means trucks were not available to bring the virus from that lab to the CDC. The trucks were out of gas. It was raining. The bridge was washed out. The trucks were in the shop. Joe, the driver, couldn’t find his mask, and he didn’t want to leave home without it…
Science is not assumptions.The pandemic is a fraud, down to the root of the poisonous tree.”


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-11--Ignore COVID Fear Porn, the UK Death Rate was HIGHER in 1999!

Ignore COVID Fear Porn , the UK Death Rate was HIGHER in 1999 !
Publicly available official data from the Office of National Statistics ( ONS ) for the past 21 years proves continued emergency lockdown measures can not be justified on the grounds of death rate .
Dr Darko Butina ’ s new study proves NO excess weekly mortalities have been recorded in England and Wales since May 29th and September 25 , 2020 .
The ONS numbers have been collated and presented in the damning graph below .
The line in red shows how the 2020 coronavirus pandemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Week 1 ‘ in up to ‘ Week 39 ‘ ( September 25 , 2020 ) .
The light blue line is the plot for the year 1999 .
All the other overlaid colored data plots are of deaths for all other years since 1999 .
As you can see , the year 1999 started and finished with a high death rate and puts into context how the COVID19 virus is no longer the threat it once was .
Moreover , even during the peak of the 2020 pandemic ( during Weeks 16 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ still not outside the range of a bad flu season .
Figure 1 .
Plot of all weekly mortality rates for last 21 years ( 1999 – 2020 ) .
Highlighted years 2020 ( red ) , 1999/2000 ( light blue ) and 2019 ( yellow ) “ The above figure is a direct plot of all the weekly mortality rates for England and Wales , from the mid-1999 up to the last week of September 2020 , published by the Office for National Statistics ( www.ons.gov.uk ) .
The X-axis represents each @ @ @ @ @ @ @ w-1 to w-52 , when a death was registered , while the Y-axis represents respective weekly death count , or mortality rate .
The total number of weeks plotted in the graph above is 1075 .
Let us first describe the graph above , by simply looking at the weekly mortality rates in last 21 years without reference to some arbitrary terms like ‘ excess mortality ’ used by the statisticians at the Office of National statistics : • The current year , 2020 , in red , had the two highest weekly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1999/2000 , the weeks 16 and 17 had the mortality of 22,351 and 21,997 respectively ( highlighted at the top of Fig.1 ) • The 3rd highest weekly mortality was recorded 21 years ago , week 52 in 1999 ( light blue ) when 18,582 people died that week , top right corner • The weekly mortality rates of this year ( red ) since the week 22 ( May 29 ) up to latest week available at the time of writing , week 39 ( September 25 ) can not be separated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ last 21 years .
In other words , the annual weekly mortalities for the weeks 22 to 39 ( the months of June , July , August , and September ) of 2020 are following the identical patterns to those observed in EVERY single year since 1999 • Last year , 2019 ( in yellow ) was incredibly low on the ‘ flu front ’ and 2020 is almost perfectly aligned with 2019 with all indications that the same patterns are expected to continue towards the end of this year , as they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is the problem that all those statisticians and governmental scientific advisors must address , without insulating our intelligence : The lockdown was justified and based on the extremely high weekly mortality rates observed in April and May of this year and recorded by the Office for National Statistics .
The weekly mortality numbers recorded and published by the same Office for National Statistics ( and plotted in Fig.1 ) since the end of May 2020 CAN NOT be distinguished from the weekly mortalities for the same annual period ( w-22 to w-39 ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ years .
It is scientifically , statistically , and logically impossible to argue , that it is justifiable to impose the unprecedented lockdown of this country , using extremely high weekly mortality rates observed in April and May , while totally ignoring the fact the weekly mortality rates for the last the 4 months have returned back to normal and are undistinguishable from the same annual period observed in last 21 years .
Instead of totally removing distancing and face masks , the government is talking about starting another round of lockdowns .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ can not be weekly mortality rates .
When scientists pick and choose very selectively which datapoints to use to achieve a wanted outcome , while totally ignoring the majority of the datapoints not fitting the narrative , it is not merely statistical artistry , it is more properly termed scientific fraud .
“ About the author : Dr Darko Butina has spent his professional carrier of 40 years in Drug Discovery sector , 20 years as experimental chemist during which time he was integral part of the team that discovered the first effective @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 20 years , he moved in the field of the computational drug discovery where computers and statistics are used to optimise the potential drug-like molecules in terms of their activity and safety .
During that period , he developed new clustering algorithm that can classify/group molecules in terms of their chemical structure , activity , and drug-like properties .
His algorithm became a standard in pharmaceutical industry and academia .
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Ignore COVID Fear Porn, the UK Death Rate was HIGHER in 1999!
Written by Dr Darko Butina
Publicly available official data from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) for the past 21 years proves continued emergency lockdown measures cannot be justified on the grounds of death rate. Dr Darko Butina’s new study proves NO excess weekly mortalities have been recorded in England and Wales since May 29th and September 25, 2020.
The ONS numbers have been collated and presented in the damning graph below. The line in red shows how the 2020 coronavirus pandemic played out from January 2020, ‘Week 1‘ in up to ‘Week 39‘ (September 25, 2020). The light blue line is the plot for the year 1999. All the other overlaid colored data plots are of deaths for all other years since 1999.
As you can see, the year 1999 started and finished with a high death rate and puts into context how the COVID19 virus is no longer the threat it once was.
Moreover, even during the peak of the 2020 pandemic (during Weeks 16 & 17) the death rate was still not outside the range of a bad flu season.
Figure 1. Plot of all weekly mortality rates for last 21 years (1999 – 2020). Highlighted years 2020 (red), 1999/2000 (light blue) and 2019 (yellow)
As Dr Butina explains:
“The above figure is a direct plot of all the weekly mortality rates for England and Wales, from the mid-1999 up to the last week of September 2020, published by the Office for National Statistics (www.ons.gov.uk). The X-axis represents each week of a year, labelled as w-1 to w-52, when a death was registered, while the Y-axis represents respective weekly death count, or mortality rate. The total number of weeks plotted in the graph above is 1075. Let us first describe the graph above, by simply looking at the weekly mortality rates in last 21 years without reference to some arbitrary terms like ‘excess mortality’ used by the statisticians at the Office of National statistics: The current year, 2020, in red , had the two highest weekly mortality recorded since flu pandemic in winter 1999/2000, the weeks 16 and 17 had the mortality of 22,351 and 21,997 respectively (highlighted at the top of Fig.1)
, had the highest weekly mortality recorded since flu pandemic in winter 1999/2000, the had the mortality of respectively (highlighted at the top of Fig.1) The 3 rd highest weekly mortality was recorded 21 years ago, week 52 in 1999 ( light blue ) when 18,582 people died that week, top right corner
was recorded 21 years ago, ( ) when died that week, top right corner The weekly mortality rates of this year (red) since the week 22 (May 29) up to latest week available at the time of writing, week 39 (September 25) cannot be separated from the same weeks mortalities in the last 21 years. In other words, the annual weekly mortalities for the weeks 22 to 39 (the months of June, July, August, and September) of 2020 are following the identical patterns to those observed in EVERY single year since 1999
Last year, 2019 (in yellow) was incredibly low on the ‘flu front’ and 2020 is almost perfectly aligned with 2019 with all indications that the same patterns are expected to continue towards the end of this year, as they did in last 21 years So here is the problem that all those statisticians and governmental scientific advisors must address, without insulating our intelligence: Fact 1: The lockdown was justified and based on the extremely high weekly mortality rates observed in April and May of this year and recorded by the Office for National Statistics. Fact 2: The weekly mortality numbers recorded and published by the same Office for National Statistics (and plotted in Fig.1) since the end of May 2020 CAN NOT be distinguished from the weekly mortalities for the same annual period (w-22 to w-39) observed for EACH of the previous 21 years. Fact 3: It is scientifically, statistically, and logically impossible to argue, that it is justifiable to impose the unprecedented lockdown of this country, using extremely high weekly mortality rates observed in April and May, while totally ignoring the fact the weekly mortality rates for the last the 4 months have returned back to normal and are undistinguishable from the same annual period observed in last 21 years. Instead of totally removing distancing and face masks, the government is talking about starting another round of lockdowns. Why and on what evidence – it cannot be weekly mortality rates. In conclusion When scientists pick and choose very selectively which datapoints to use to achieve a wanted outcome, while totally ignoring the majority of the datapoints not fitting the narrative, it is not merely statistical artistry, it is more properly termed scientific fraud. “
About the author: Dr Darko Butina has spent his professional career of 40 years in the Drug Discovery sector, 20 years as an experimental chemist during which time he was an integral part of the team that discovered the first effective treatment for migraine. During his last 20 years, he moved in the field of the computational drug discovery where computers and statistics are used to optimise the potential drug-like molecules in terms of their activity and safety. During that period, he developed a new clustering algorithm that can classify/group molecules in terms of their chemical structure, activity, and drug-like properties. His algorithm became a standard in the global pharmaceutical industry and academia.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-12--What the Term ‘Medical Mafia’ Means

What the Term ‘Medical Mafia’ Means

In case your wondering why the term “ Medical Mafia ” is used occasionally to describe the unholy trinity of AMA ( American Medical Association ) , FDA ( Food and Drug Administration ) , and Big Pharma , here ’ s a brief historical summary .
But first , important to note that I ’ m not against allopathic medicine .
It ’ s very appropriate for physical trauma from injuries , emergency situations , and can be useful for various ailments .
I am against the tyrannical monopoly they enforce with mafia-like tactics of threats , lies , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who earnestly heal and prevent disease better and more safely .
Additionally , I ’ m against allopathic medicine ’ s shutting down access to other more efficacious , safe , and less expensive medical options – alternative healing .
The Financial Seeds of Medical Tyranny Prior to the early twentieth century , thriving empirical medical practices , herbal and homeopathic , were more popular than allopathic medicine , which at that time specialized in surgery .
This changed as influential individuals secured a spot on the financial empire .
The Carnegie , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the turn of the 20th Century was the impetus toward total power over the medical field .
Soon after their initial thrusts , it was the Rockefeller Institute that ensured the growth of this monopoly .
After all , it was John D. Rockefeller who was quoted as saying , “ Competition is a sin.
” Even the newly formed antitrust laws of the early 20th Century could not deter John D. from figuring out how to get around those restrictions with his oil business .
One could say Rockefeller was the Godfather @ @ @ @ @ @ @ games with his industries and retaining his monopoly .
The early centerpiece of his empire was oil .
But early on , JD Rockefeller was aware of expanding his financial empire through the burgeoning pharmaceutical industry .
His intention was to control the whole medical field , using the only remedies allowed , patented synthetic drugs .
So John D. started by donating to medical schools , beginning with the University of Chicago ’ s School of Medicine .
The stipulations were that only pharmaceutical based medicine would be taught .
Then he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of other traditions throughout the nation “ evaluating ” the treatments they taught .
From that came the 1906 Flexner Report , which was sufficient to persuade lawmakers into creating legislation that would license only physicians trained in patented chemical based pharmacology and surgery .
Meanwhile , John D. Rockefeller recruited JP Morgan and Dale Carnegie as partners for buying a controlling share of the German drug cartel I.G .
Farben .
The AMA had been in existence since 1847 as an allopathic physician ’ s union .
It came into prominence as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on , with exclusive power over granting and revoking medical licensing .
The AMA would ridicule other non-synthetic drug medical practices as “ quackery ” and ensure those practitioners were driven out of business .
After all , competition is a sin , J.D .
Rockefeller once quipped .
Ironically , it ’ s reported that during this time , the Rockefeller family used homeopathy for their medical needs .
Morris Fishbein ’ s tenure as head of the AMA and editor of JAMA ( Journal of the American Medical Association ) from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ terrorizing medical practitioners who strayed from accepted surgical and pharmaceutical dogma .
Occasionally , there were Sherman Anti-Trust Law suits against the AMA that succeeded .
But overall , the legacy of AMA tyranny , with support from the FDA , has grown to become the enforcer for what many deem the ‘ Medical Mafia ’ today .
The Medical Mafia even managed to get past Senator Benedict Fitzgerald ’ s scathing congressional committee report in 1953 .
That ’ s because the report was conveniently buried in congressional archives until recently retrieved @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That report was originally ordered by Congressman Charles Toby , whose son was cured of terminal cancer by an alternative practitioner .
Toby wanted to know why these cancer therapies were not easily accessible to the general public , so he tracked down every institute and publication involved with the cancer industry and carefully reviewed cases of suppressed alternative cancer treatments .
He saw the cancer industry ’ s big picture clearly .
The Rockefeller Foundation ’ s tentacles began wrapping around top publishers and media moguls several decades ago .
And Big @ @ @ @ @ @ @ As a Bob Dylan line from one of his early songs goes , “ Money doesn ’ t talk , it swears.
” Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

What the Term ‘Medical Mafia’ Means
Written by Paul Fassa
In case your wondering why the term “Medical Mafia” is used occasionally to describe the unholy trinity of AMA (American Medical Association), FDA (Food and Drug Administration), and Big Pharma, here’s a brief historical summary.
But first, important to note that I’m not against allopathic medicine. It’s very appropriate for physical trauma from injuries,emergency situations, and can be useful for various ailments. I am against the tyrannical monopoly they enforce with mafia-like tactics of threats, lies, distortions to ruin the lives of those who earnestly heal and prevent disease better and more safely.
Additionally, I’m against allopathic medicine’s shutting down access to other more efficacious, safe, and less expensive medical options – alternative healing.
The Financial Seeds of Medical Tyranny
Prior to the early twentieth century, thriving empirical medical practices, herbal and homeopathic, were more popular than allopathic medicine, which at that time specialized in surgery. This changed as influential individuals secured a spot on the financial empire.
The Carnegie, Morgan, and Rockefeller financial conglomeration at the turn of the 20th Century was the impetus toward total power over the medical field. Soon after their initial thrusts, it was the Rockefeller Institute that ensured the growth of this monopoly. After all, it was John D. Rockefeller who was quoted as saying, “Competition is a sin.”
Even the newly formed antitrust laws of the early 20th Century could not deter John D. from figuring out how to get around those restrictions with his oil business. One could say Rockefeller was the Godfather of antitrust law chicanery by playing shell games with his industries and retaining his monopoly.
The early centerpiece of his empire was oil. But early on, JD Rockefeller was aware of expanding his financial empire through the burgeoning pharmaceutical industry. His intention was to control the whole medical field, using the only remedies allowed, patented synthetic drugs.
Natural remedies can’t be patented, and patents bring big profits.
So John D. started by donating to medical schools, beginning with the University of Chicago’s School of Medicine. The stipulations were that only pharmaceutical based medicine would be taught. Then he hired Abraham Flexner to tour medical schools of other traditions throughout the nation “evaluating” the treatments they taught.
From that came the 1906 Flexner Report, which was sufficient to persuade lawmakers into creating legislation that would license only physicians trained in patented chemical based pharmacology and surgery.
Meanwhile, John D. Rockefeller recruited JP Morgan and Dale Carnegie as partners for buying a controlling share of the German drug cartel I.G. Farben. The AMA had been in existence since 1847 as an allopathic physician’s union. It came into prominence as a ruling medical non-government agency from 1920 on, with exclusive power over granting and revoking medical licensing.
The AMA would ridicule other non-synthetic drug medical practices as “quackery” and ensure those practitioners were driven out of business. After all, competition is a sin, J.D. Rockefeller once quipped. Ironically, it’s reported that during this time, the Rockefeller family used homeopathy for their medical needs.
The AMA/Cancer Industry Dodges a Congressional Bullet
Morris Fishbein’s tenure as head of the AMA and editor of JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) from 1924 to 1950 set the precedent for terrorizing medical practitioners who strayed from accepted surgical and pharmaceutical dogma.
Occasionally, there were Sherman Anti-Trust Law suits against the AMA that succeeded. But overall, the legacy of AMA tyranny, with support from the FDA, has grown to become the enforcer for what many deem the ‘Medical Mafia’ today.
The Medical Mafia even managed to get past Senator Benedict Fitzgerald’s scathing congressional committee report in 1953. That’s because the report was conveniently buried in congressional archives until recently retrieved by medical crusader Dr. Stanley Monteith.
That report was originally ordered by Congressman Charles Toby, whose son was cured of terminal cancer by an alternative practitioner. Toby wanted to know why these cancer therapies were not easily accessible to the general public, so he tracked down every institute and publication involved with the cancer industry and carefully reviewed cases of suppressed alternative cancer treatments. He saw the cancer industry’s big picture clearly.
A quote from that report: “Behind this is the weirdest conglomeration of corrupt motives, intrigues, jealousy, selfishness, obstruction, and conspiracy I have ever seen.”
The Rockefeller Foundation’s tentacles began wrapping around top publishers and media moguls several decades ago. And Big Pharma currently spends billions on advertising. As a Bob Dylan line from one of his early songs goes, “Money doesn’t talk, it swears.”
Additional Sources: NaturalNews/008845, NewMediaExplorer
Read more at naturalsociety.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related