principiascientificinternational--2020-07-14--The Hottest Day Ever in Australia Confirmed: Jan. 1909

The Hottest Day Ever in Australia Confirmed : Jan. 1909 The Australian Bureau of Meteorology deleted what was long regarded as the hottest day ever recorded in Australia , Bourke ’ s 125°F ( 51.7°C ) on Sunday , January 3 , 1909 .
This record* was deleted , falsely claiming that this was likely some sort of ‘ observational error ’ , as no other official weather stations recorded high temperatures on that day .
However , the Liberal Member for Hughes , Craig Kelly , has visited the Australian National Archive at Chester Hill in western Sydney to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It has taken Kelly some months to track down this historical evidence .
Through access to the archived book for the weather station at Brewarrina , which is the nearest official weather station to Bourke , it can now be confirmed that a temperature of 123°F ( 50.6°C ) was recorded at Brewarrina for January 3 , 1909 .
This contradicts claims from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology that only Bourke recorded an extraordinarily hot temperature on that day .
Just today , Friday 10th July 2020 , Mr. Kelly MP obtained access @ @ @ @ @ @ @ closest official weather station to the official weather station at Bourke .
He has photographed the relevant page from the book of the observation , and it shows 123°F was recorded at 9.00 am on the morning of Monday , January 4 , 1909 – published here for the first time .
This was the highest temperature in the previous 24 hours and corroborates what must now be recognized as the hottest day ever recorded in Australia of 125°F ( 51.7°C ) degrees at Bourke on the afternoon of Sunday , January 4 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Meteorology denies these record hot days is a travesty .
Is it because these records contradict their belief in catastrophic human-caused global warming ?
The temperature of 50.6°C ( 123°F ) recorded back in 1909 which is more than 100 years ago , photographed by Kelly last week at the National Archives in Chester Hill , is almost equivalent to the current official hottest day ever for Australia of 50.7 degrees Celsius at Oodnadatta on 2nd January 1960 .
These are in fact only the fourth and third hottest days recorded in Australia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tracked-down the book of meteorological observations for Brewarrina , but over the last week , he has also uncovered that 51.1°C ( 124°F ) was recorded at White Cliffs for Wednesday , January 11 , 1939 .
This is the second hottest ever !
The evidence , a photograph from the relevant page of the White Cliff ’ s meteorological observations book , is published here for the first time .
Until Kelly ’ s efforts , this second hottest-ever record was hidden in undigitised archives .
It is only through his persistence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stations in the vicinity of Bourke that this and other hot days have been discovered .
If we ’ re to be honest to our history , then the record hot day at Bourke of 51.7°C ( 125°F ) must be re-instated and , further , the very hot 50.6°C ( 123°F ) recorded for Brewarrina on the same day must be entered into the official databases .
Also , the temperature of 51.1°C ( 124°F ) recorded at White Cliffs on January 12 , 1939 , must be recognized as the second @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be denied by the Bureau because they occurred in the past , before catastrophic human-caused global warming is thought to have come into effect , is absurd .
At a time in world history when Australians are raising concerns about the Chinese communist party removing books from Libraries in Hong Kong , we should be equally concerned with the Australian Bureau of Meteorology removing temperature records from our history .
If global warming is indeed the greatest moral issue of our time , then every Australian regardless of their politics and their opinion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be honest to history and these truths .
• This temperature ( 125°F/51.7°C on the 3rd January 1909 ) was recorded at an official Bureau weather station and using a mercury thermometer in a Stevenson screen .
Hotter temperatures were recorded in 1896 but the mercury thermometers were not in Stevenson screens , which is considered the standard for housing recording equipment .
Dr. Jennifer Marohasy is a senior fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

The Hottest Day Ever in Australia Confirmed: Jan. 1909
Written by Jennifer Marohasy
The Australian Bureau of Meteorology deleted what was long regarded as the hottest day ever recorded in Australia, Bourke’s 125°F (51.7°C) on Sunday, January 3, 1909.
This record* was deleted, falsely claiming that this was likely some sort of ‘observational error’, as no other official weather stations recorded high temperatures on that day.
However, the Liberal Member for Hughes, Craig Kelly, has visited the Australian National Archive at Chester Hill in western Sydney to view very old meteorological observation books.
It has taken Kelly some months to track down this historical evidence. Through access to the archived book for the weather station at Brewarrina, which is the nearest official weather station to Bourke, it can now be confirmed that a temperature of 123°F (50.6°C) was recorded at Brewarrina for January 3, 1909.
This contradicts claims from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology that only Bourke recorded an extraordinarily hot temperature on that day.
Just today, Friday 10th July 2020, Mr. Kelly MP obtained access to this record for Brewarrina, the closest official weather station to the official weather station at Bourke.
He has photographed the relevant page from the book of the observation, and it shows 123°F was recorded at 9.00 am on the morning of Monday, January 4, 1909 – published here for the first time.
This was the highest temperature in the previous 24 hours and corroborates what must now be recognized as the hottest day ever recorded in Australia of 125°F (51.7°C) degrees at Bourke on the afternoon of Sunday, January 4, 1909.
That the Bureau of Meteorology denies these record hot days is a travesty. Is it because these records contradict their belief in catastrophic human-caused global warming?
The temperature of 50.6°C (123°F) recorded back in 1909 which is more than 100 years ago, photographed by Kelly last week at the National Archives in Chester Hill, is almost equivalent to the current official hottest day ever for Australia of 50.7 degrees Celsius at Oodnadatta on 2nd January 1960.
These are in fact only the fourth and third hottest days recorded in Australia, respectively.
Not only has Kelly tracked-down the book of meteorological observations for Brewarrina, but over the last week, he has also uncovered that 51.1°C (124°F) was recorded at White Cliffs for Wednesday, January 11, 1939. This is the second hottest ever!
The evidence, a photograph from the relevant page of the White Cliff’s meteorological observations book, is published here for the first time.
Until Kelly’s efforts, this second hottest-ever record was hidden in undigitised archives.
It is only through his persistence the temperatures at all the official weather stations in the vicinity of Bourke that this and other hot days have been discovered.
If we’re to be honest to our history, then the record hot day at Bourke of 51.7°C (125°F) must be re-instated and, further, the very hot 50.6°C (123°F) recorded for Brewarrina on the same day must be entered into the official databases.
Also, the temperature of 51.1°C (124°F) recorded at White Cliffs on January 12, 1939, must be recognized as the second hottest ever.
For these temperatures to be denied by the Bureau because they occurred in the past, before catastrophic human-caused global warming is thought to have come into effect, is absurd.
At a time in world history when Australians are raising concerns about the Chinese communist party removing books from Libraries in Hong Kong, we should be equally concerned with the Australian Bureau of Meteorology removing temperature records from our history.
If global warming is indeed the greatest moral issue of our time, then every Australian regardless of their politics and their opinion on greenhouse gases and renewable energy must be honest to history and these truths.
This temperature (125°F/51.7°C on the 3rd January 1909) was recorded at an official Bureau weather station and using a mercury thermometer in a Stevenson screen. Hotter temperatures were recorded in 1896 but the mercury thermometers were not in Stevenson screens, which is considered the standard for housing recording equipment.
Read more at Jennifer Marohasy
Dr. Jennifer Marohasy is a senior fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-07-14--More Evidence Pandemic is a UN ‘Live Exercise’ – World Leaders Complicit

Major documentary confirmation of something many of us have come to know for certain in recent times : the entire COVID-19 world-shutdown is part of a live training and simulation exercise run by the unscrupulous WHO and United Nations .
The evidence is documented in their Global Preparedness Monitoring Board ’ s annual 2019 report and their International Health Regulations treaty of 2005—which 194/or 196 countries signed off on—which pretty much establishes a Global Government ( of the WHO & United Nations , & the high-level international GMPB ) along with their sponsors , the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unnamed donors .
Please share this video widely .
People in office have failed their oaths to protect the people , and We the People need to wake up and do something definitive about it .
Every government has been complicit in the destruction of their own country ’ s economy , the vast suffering of their people brought on by these massive shutdowns and house-arrest assaults-on-the-psyche as people lost jobs , livelihood , purpose in life , social life , and were held back from any normalcy in going outdoors , even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wear masks in public instead and submit to police tyranny .
Meanwhile , small and large businesses have crashed , families have been prevented from seeing their elderly relatives in hospice , many have died alone .
Hospitals are cooking up numbers for COVID deaths , MSM plays out strings of new cases and new deaths .
DOCS HERE : A World at Risk , 2019 , Annual Report GPMB : https : //apps.who.int/gpmb/assets/annu… International Health Regulations ( 2005 ) https : //www.who.int/ihr/publications/… Some of the links/pages I referenced during this talk : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : //www.gatesfoundation.org/How-W… https : //www.aspeninstitute.org/ https : //www.gatesfoundation.org/searc… *** SUBSCRIBE TO STAY INFORMED : PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

More Evidence Pandemic is a UN ‘Live Exercise’ – World Leaders Complicit
Written by Ramola D Reports
Major documentary confirmation of something many of us have come to know for certain in recent times: the entire COVID-19 world-shutdown is part of a live training and simulation exercise run by the unscrupulous WHO and United Nations.
The evidence is documented in their Global Preparedness Monitoring Board’s annual 2019 report and their International Health Regulations treaty of 2005—which 194/or 196 countries signed off on—which pretty much establishes a Global Government (of the WHO & United Nations, & the high-level international GMPB) along with their sponsors, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, & other unnamed donors.
Please share this video widely. People in office have failed their oaths to protect the people, and We the People need to wake up and do something definitive about it.
Every government has been complicit in the destruction of their own country’s economy, the vast suffering of their people brought on by these massive shutdowns and house-arrest assaults-on-the-psyche as people lost jobs, livelihood, purpose in life, social life, and were held back from any normalcy in going outdoors, even to sanctuaries in Nature but forced to wear masks in public instead and submit to police tyranny.
Meanwhile, small and large businesses have crashed, families have been prevented from seeing their elderly relatives in hospice, many have died alone. Hospitals are cooking up numbers for COVID deaths, MSM plays out strings of new cases and new deaths. DOCS HERE: A World at Risk, 2019, Annual Report GPMB: https://apps.who.int/gpmb/assets/annu… International Health Regulations (2005) https://www.who.int/ihr/publications/… Some of the links/pages I referenced during this talk: https://www.who.int/ihr/about/en/ https://www.who.int/gho/ihr/en/ https://www.gatesfoundation.org/How-W… https://www.aspeninstitute.org/ https://www.gatesfoundation.org/searc… *** SUBSCRIBE TO STAY INFORMED:
****
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-07-15--NBC Guest Doctor Exposed Lying to Viewers about his COVID-19 Sickness

NBC Guest Doctor Exposed Lying to Viewers about his COVID-19 Sickness Dr. Joseph Fair appeared on NBC and the Today Show nearly a dozen times in May during the height of the coronavirus pandemic in the United States .
Dr. Fair appeared in a hospital bed fighting off the disease with oxygen tubes in his nose when he appeared on NBC .
In one segment Dr. Joseph Fair told the Today hosts , “ If it can take me down , it can take anybody.
” But it was all a lie .
Dr. Joseph Fair did not have coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ An NBC medical expert who was brought on air nearly a dozen times to detail his struggle with COVID-19 never had the virus , he revealed this week .
After believing he had the coronavirus in spite of getting negative tests , virologist and NBC News science contributor Dr. Joseph Fair tweeted Tuesday that he had tested negative for the antibodies and that the illness that hospitalized him in May “ remains an undiagnosed mystery.
” Steve Krakauer reported on the developments for his Fourth Watch newsletter .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

NBC Guest Doctor Exposed Lying to Viewers about his COVID-19 Sickness
Written by Jim Hoft
Dr. Joseph Fair appeared on NBC and the Today Show nearly a dozen times in May during the height of the coronavirus pandemic in the United States.
Dr. Fair appeared in a hospital bed fighting off the disease with oxygen tubes in his nose when he appeared on NBC. In one segment Dr. Joseph Fair told the Today hosts, “If it can take me down, it can take anybody.”
But it was all a lie. Dr. Joseph Fair did not have coronavirus. He admitted it this week.
Wow. Should NBC Issue An Apology?
The Free Beacon reported:
An NBC medical expert who was brought on air nearly a dozen times to detail his struggle with COVID-19 never had the virus, he revealed this week. After believing he had the coronavirus in spite of getting negative tests, virologist and NBC News science contributor Dr. Joseph Fair tweeted Tuesday that he had tested negative for the antibodies and that the illness that hospitalized him in May “remains an undiagnosed mystery.” Steve Krakauer reported on the developments for his Fourth Watch newsletter.
Read the rest here.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print


principiascientificinternational--2020-07-15--12 Scientific Reasons to Reject Vaccination

New England Journal of Medicine : Chief Editor Marcia Angell MD.
, “ It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published , or to rely on the judgement of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines.
” Lancet Chief Editor Richard Horton , “ …much of the scientific literature , perhaps half , may simply be untrue … flagrant conflicts of interest … science has taken a turn towards darkness.
” • Manufacturers warn vax cause polio , cot death [ SIDS ] , encephalitis , bleeding , paralysis , cancer , neuritis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ [ MS ] etc .
Claiming vax protects us from disease is contradicted as authorities report that vaxed patients can catch disease from , and infect , people both vaxed or unvaxed .
Impossible if vax work .
• Vax have never been scientifically tested ( double blind & inert placebo ) to show : a ) if vax work , b ) safety , and c ) which group is healthier long-term .
The US Health Dept was exposed in a major 2018 court loss after falsely claiming for 32 years that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the vital yearly safety studies Congress ordered them to do .
• Vax ignores 18 critical , life-saving , medical , ethical , legal and common sense requirements .
Before any vax injection , the patient ’ s medical history , age , allergies , sex , weight , medications , race and illnesses should be examined .
Doctors must disclose ingredients , harmful effects & get informed consent .
Prescriptions are essential and must be in writing for a specific patient ( never groups ) , disease , vax , dose and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in 10,000 to 1 in 25 ( 2020 ) since MMR [ Measles/Mumps/Rubella ] vax began in the US in 1974 .
Drug Co. Sanofi Pasteur warned : “ Adverse events include autism.
” Dr H. Wang , Director Special Needs Children , reported in 2005 : “ The autism rate for Amish [ who don ’ t vax ] in Ohio was 1 in 15,000.
” In 2004 , CDC [ Centres for Disease Control ] researchers found a huge rise in autism in African Ameri-can boys under age 3 after MMR @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his CDC team falsified and tried to erase this proof that vax causes autism .
• Medicine and vax are based on a refuted theory about germs by Louis Pasteur who plagiarised [ stole from ] and misinterpreted brilliant scientist Dr. Antoine Bechamp who demonstrated dis-ease is caused by toxaemia [ a build up of metabolic waste/toxins ] .
Professor ( Sir ) Alexander Ross MD.
, Fellow of the Royal Society of England , “ I do not question the existence of infinitesimal micro-organisms [ germs ] but they are the result @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
They are the scavengers ; their legitimate work is to clean out the sewers of our bodies .
Wherever there is decay , pus or decomposing matters , these little lifesavers are doing their work of neutralisation , sanitation and purification… ” .
Three crucial questions medicine has never reasonably answered ; 1 .
How can we have germs and not the disease they allegedly cause ?
2 .
How can we have a disease but not the germs claimed to cause it ?
3 .
How can germs change ?
e.g @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
Our bodies create germs to heal .
Germs do not attack healthy tissue .
Without germs we would die .
• A US Health Dept study by Harvard Medical School found less than 1 % of vax caused injuries/deaths are reported .
Whistle blowing Drs who expose vax harm are vilified , defund-ed & persecuted despite 200 years of medical disasters : mercury , asbestos , DDT , thalidomide , Vioxx , lead , Prozac , childbed fever carnage ( doctors refusing to wash ) , dioxin , DES , etc .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , to be safe & effective ; despite proof of injury and death to millions of people & multi-billions in public costs .
In Australia , authorities reveal at least 18,000 deaths & 320,000 injuries are caused each year by doctors , drugs and in hospitals .
Only we can decide if we or our children take drugs : confirmed by the Commonwealth Constitution S. 51xxiiiA .
• Dis-ease has one cause : toxaemia/ blood poisoning from ingesting drugs and chemical-ised , denatured , processed , lifeless , artificial/imitation food & drink .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ remedy to dis-ease is rest , sunlight , pure water/air , exercise , fresh organic food , sleep , fasting and a positive outlook : none offered by the trillion dollar medico/pharma deception .
These traditional laws of health and disease contrast medical training based on supp-ressing & removing symptoms with perilous , costly chemotherapy , surgery , radiation and drugs , not on understanding , preventing and correcting poisoned bodies .
Your decisions choose either vibrant health or sickness .
• Worldwide government statistics show infectious diseases [ chickenpox , smallpox , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , etc . ]
were in major decline decades before widespread vax , due to improvements in hygiene : Medical historians record dis-ease causes asrats , slums , fouled water ( animal/human waste ) , diseased milk , poverty , child labour , putrid air and despair .
Rectified with new building/ labor laws , sanitation , isolation , clean-ing , electricity , nutrition etc .
Not vax .
Vaxers usually hide this with graphs showing statistics after vax not before .
• In declaring vax “ unavoidably unsafe ” , the US @ @ @ @ @ @ @ guaranteed vax benefits , all vaccines are experimental .
Vaccines destroy the life-long natural immunity gained by exposure to the usual mild childhood diseases .
After vax , such diseases in adults can be life-threatening .
Australia ’ s 2020 Vaccine Schedule is : 50 by age six ; 73 by age 18 and 150 vaccines by age 65 .
• Every vax injects/ infects you with disease .
The result is that disease epidemics occur almost exclusively in vaxed regions .
Independent studies show herd immunity claims that epidemics can not occur @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , remain untrue : England , 1871-72 : with 98 % of ages two to 50 vaxed with smallpox , 45,000 died of smallpox : Germany had 96 % vaxed and 125,000 smallpox deaths .
In 1940 , Germany made Diphtheria vax compulsory .
By 1945 diphtheria cases had soared from 40,000 to 250,000 .
• Aust .
Federal Treasury ( under FOI law ) revealed the Australian government is a US Company .
Like Coles , no company has law-ful power to compel anything .
Protect families from force/ penalties/ injury/ death @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ‘ Affidavits ’ ; ‘ Notices ’ ; ‘ Private Administrative Processes ’ & ‘ Commercial Liens ’ [ each with ] + ‘ strawman ’ .
These true laws hold vaxers/ all company agents , personally liable financially & under penalty of perjury , who quickly become un-willing to support unlawful forced vax .
Download the free interactive eBook ‘ 1200 Studies ’ .
2 .
Network : build teams .
3 .
Run a ‘ Save Lives ’ education campaign .
4 .
Tell every-one : letterbox , notice boards @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , full-page newspaper ad , shop windows .
5 .
Buy the NZ Journal of Natural Medicine .
6 .
View the brilliant series ‘ Every vax causes harm ’ by Dr. Andrew Moulden .
7 .
Ask friends , “ Is there any point you disagree with ?
” 8 .
Support pro freedom-of-choice Drs/MP ’ s .
9 .
Get healthy .
10 .
Call a vax Royal Commission or ‘ People ’ s Court ’ .
11 .
Introduce a Binding Citizens Initiated Referendum law [ BCIR ] as the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ • This page is for education .
It does not give medical , legal or psychiatric advice .
©2020 Blog : 12 reasons ( to come PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

12 Scientific Reasons to Reject Vaccination
Written by Dennis Stevenson
New England Journal of Medicine: Chief Editor Marcia Angell MD., “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgement of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines.” Lancet Chief Editor Richard Horton, “…much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue … flagrant conflicts of interest … science has taken a turn towards darkness.”
Manufacturers list vax ingredients as mercury, aborted baby DNA, aluminium, cancer tumours, anti-freeze, cow fetus, hydrochloric acid, Simian (SV40) virus, insect cells, formaldehyde, MSG, latex, detergent. Vax contaminants include lead, cyanide, tin, arsenic, urea (urine waste). Manufacturers warn vax cause polio, cot death [SIDS], encephalitis, bleeding, paralysis, cancer, neuritis, convulsions, death, multiple sclerosis [MS] etc. Claiming vax protects us from disease is contradicted as authorities report that vaxed patients can catch disease from, and infect, people both vaxed or unvaxed. Impossible if vax work. Vax have never been scientifically tested (double blind & inert placebo) to show: a) if vax work, b) safety, and c) which group is healthier long-term. The US Health Dept was exposed in a major 2018 court loss after falsely claiming for 32 years that vax were safe without ever once doing the vital yearly safety studies Congress ordered them to do. Vax ignores 18 critical, life-saving, medical, ethical, legal and common sense requirements. Before any vax injection, the patient’s medical history, age, allergies, sex, weight, medications, race and illnesses should be examined. Doctors must disclose ingredients, harmful effects & get informed consent. Prescriptions are essential and must be in writing for a specific patient (never groups), disease, vax, dose and duration. Autism exploded from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 25 (2020) since MMR [Measles/Mumps/Rubella] vax began in the US in 1974. Drug Co. Sanofi Pasteur warned: “Adverse events include autism.” Dr H. Wang, Director Special Needs Children, reported in 2005: “The autism rate for Amish [who don’t vax] in Ohio was 1 in 15,000.” In 2004, CDC [Centres for Disease Control] researchers found a huge rise in autism in African Ameri-can boys under age 3 after MMR vax. Sen/Scientist Dr W. Thompson revealed his CDC team falsified and tried to erase this proof that vax causes autism. Medicine and vax are based on a refuted theory about germs by Louis Pasteur who plagiarised [stole from] and misinterpreted brilliant scientist Dr. Antoine Bechamp who demonstrated dis-ease is caused by toxaemia [a build up of metabolic waste/toxins]. Professor (Sir) Alexander Ross MD., Fellow of the Royal Society of England, “I do not question the existence of infinitesimal micro-organisms [germs] but they are the result, not the cause, of disease. They are the scavengers; their legitimate work is to clean out the sewers of our bodies. Wherever there is decay, pus or decomposing matters, these little lifesavers are doing their work of neutralisation, sanitation and purification…”. Three crucial questions medicine has never reasonably answered; 1. How can we have germs and not the disease they allegedly cause? 2. How can we have a disease but not the germs claimed to cause it? 3. How can germs change? e.g. polio to smallpox? The answer? Our bodies create germs to heal. Germs do not attack healthy tissue. Without germs we would die. A US Health Dept study by Harvard Medical School found less than 1{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of vax caused injuries/deaths are reported. Whistle blowing Drs who expose vax harm are vilified, defund-ed & persecuted despite 200 years of medical disasters: mercury, asbestos, DDT, thalidomide, Vioxx, lead, Prozac, childbed fever carnage (doctors refusing to wash), dioxin, DES, etc. All were alleged, as are vax, to be safe & effective; despite proof of injury and death to millions of people & multi-billions in public costs. In Australia, authorities reveal at least 18,000 deaths & 320,000 injuries are caused each year by doctors, drugs and in hospitals. Only we can decide if we or our children take drugs: confirmed by the Commonwealth Constitution S. 51xxiiiA. Dis-ease has one cause: toxaemia/ blood poisoning from ingesting drugs and chemical-ised, denatured, processed, lifeless, artificial/imitation food & drink. As our bodies are self healing the remedy to dis-ease is rest, sunlight, pure water/air, exercise, fresh organic food, sleep, fasting and a positive outlook: none offered by the trillion dollar medico/pharma deception. These traditional laws of health and disease contrast medical training based on supp-ressing & removing symptoms with perilous, costly chemotherapy, surgery, radiation and drugs, not on understanding, preventing and correcting poisoned bodies. Your decisions choose either vibrant health or sickness. Worldwide government statistics show infectious diseases [chickenpox, smallpox, Flu, polio, TB, measles, etc.] were in major decline decades before widespread vax, due to improvements in hygiene: Medical historians record dis-ease causes asrats, slums, fouled water (animal/human waste), diseased milk, poverty, child labour, putrid air and despair. Rectified with new building/ labor laws, sanitation, isolation, clean-ing, electricity, nutrition etc. Not vax. Vaxers usually hide this with graphs showing statistics after vax not before. In declaring vax “unavoidably unsafe”, the US Congress established that as there are no guaranteed vax benefits, all vaccines are experimental. Vaccines destroy the life-long natural immunity gained by exposure to the usual mild childhood diseases. After vax, such diseases in adults can be life-threatening. Australia’s 2020 Vaccine Schedule is: 50 by age six; 73 by age 18 and 150 vaccines by age 65. Every vax injects/ infects you with disease. The result is that disease epidemics occur almost exclusively in vaxed regions. Independent studies show herd immunity claims that epidemics cannot occur if 95{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of people are vaxed, remain untrue: England, 1871-72: with 98{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of ages two to 50 vaxed with smallpox, 45,000 died of smallpox: Germany had 96{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} vaxed and 125,000 smallpox deaths. In 1940, Germany made Diphtheria vax compulsory. By 1945 diphtheria cases had soared from 40,000 to 250,000. Aust. Federal Treasury (under FOI law) revealed the Australian government is a US Company. Like Coles, no company has law-ful power to compel anything. Protect families from force/ penalties/ injury/ death. Search ‘10 Commercial Maxims’, ‘Affidavits’; ‘Notices’; ‘Private Administrative Processes’ & ‘Commercial Liens’ [each with] +‘strawman’. These true laws hold vaxers/ all company agents, personally liable financially & under penalty of perjury, who quickly become un-willing to support unlawful forced vax.
Download the free interactive eBook ‘1200 Studies’. 2. Network: build teams. 3. Run a ‘Save Lives’ education campaign. 4. Tell every-one: letterbox, notice boards, street tables, hand-outs, fundraise, full-page newspaper ad, shop windows. 5. Buy the NZ Journal of Natural Medicine. 6. View the brilliant series ‘Every vax causes harm’ by Dr. Andrew Moulden. 7. Ask friends, “Is there any point you disagree with?” 8. Support pro freedom-of-choice Drs/MP’s. 9. Get healthy. 10. Call a vax Royal Commission or ‘People’s Court’. 11. Introduce a Binding Citizens Initiated Referendum law [BCIR] as the Swiss successfully did 150 years ago.
Investigative researcher/ author: dennis: stevenson’s life: Intelligence Instructor, Parliamentarian, lecturer, Co. Director, Police Officer, Health Centre operator, Educator, labourer, Community/Business coach.
This page is for education. It does not give medical, legal or psychiatric advice. ©2020 Blog: 12 reasons (to come
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-07-15--Study: ‘No Warming’ For Past 30 Years Over Most of Our Planet

Study : ‘ No Warming ’ For Past 30 Years Over Most of Our Planet A new study documents the dominance of internal variability in decadal-scale global temperature changes and suggests we may experience a global cooling trend during the next 15 or even 30 years despite rising greenhouse gases .
Maher et al .
( 2020 ) acknowledge that internal variability in global surface temperature variations is “ a difficult concept to communicate ” because we have very few observations of its impact and so we must rely on assumptions about how the climate system might work .
Those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ affects global surface temperature often use the “ Butterfly Effect ” paradigm ; they assume that small changes now can lead to larger changes decades from now .
Because global temperature trends are “ largely determined by internal variability ” , global cooling or another warming hiatus could very well be observed over the next decade .
Actually , as Maher and colleagues explain , “ even out to thirty years large parts of the globe ( or most of the globe in MPI-GE and CMIP5 ) could still experience no-warming due to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tricks Zone PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Study: ‘No Warming’ For Past 30 Years Over Most of Our Planet
Written by Kenneth Richard
A new study documents the dominance of internal variability in decadal-scale global temperature changes and suggests we may experience a global cooling trend during the next 15 or even 30 years despite rising greenhouse gases.
Maher et al. (2020) acknowledge that internal variability in global surface temperature variations is “a difficult concept to communicate” because we have very few observations of its impact and so we must rely on assumptions about how the climate system might work.
Those who try to explain how internal variability affects global surface temperature often use the “Butterfly Effect” paradigm; they assume that small changes now can lead to larger changes decades from now.
Because global temperature trends are “largely determined by internal variability”, global cooling or another warming hiatus could very well be observed over the next decade.
Actually, as Maher and colleagues explain, “even out to thirty years large parts of the globe (or most of the globe in MPI-GE and CMIP5) could still experience no-warming due to internal variability.”
Read more at No Tricks Zone
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-07-15--Exposed: NASA/NOAA Erased The Arctic’s 1940’s ‘Warming Blip’

Tony Heller ’ s website realclimatescience.com is a one-stop-shop for exposing government agency data-fudging .
For decades , NASA/NOAA has been cooling the past so as to create a fake warming trend — all in a desperate attempt to sustain their failing AGW theory .
Furthermore , and not to get too personal here , but why are the scientists at the heart of the fraud such slimy , thin-skinned wusses–desperate to evade scrutiny at all costs ?
What do they have to hide ?
Case in point , watch this embarrassing interview with NASA ’ s Gavin Schmidt .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ wasn ’ t a debate.
” And while I urge you watch the entire video , particularly the parts with the excellent Dr. Roy Spencer ( a real climate scientist btw ) , skip to 2:00 and then to 6:30 if you ’ re interested in Schmidt ’ s “ la la la , I ’ m not listening to you ” evading tactics .
So NASA refuses to debate an issue which supposedly negatively impacts every living organism on the planet — and 2013 should be considered the good old days @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worked a position where so-called skeptics have no platform at all .
Today , even this kind of non-debate would never be agreed to .
But looking at the ever-mounting case against NASA/NOAA , re their temperature graphs , they probably have good reason to evade scrutiny .
Serving as just one example , government agencies have been erasing the 1940s warmth in the Eastern Arctic for decades , writes Tony Heller .
This is what the raw data for Iceland ’ s capital Reykjavík looks like : And this is what the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adjustments : Note the tactic — cool the past in order to fabricate a warming trend where there was none before : Removing the warmth of the 1940s ( without any justification ) was discussed by the world ’ s leading climate experts in this Climategate email : Those at the Icelandic Met Office ( IMO ) couldn ’ t understand the adjustments .
Trausti Jónsson , a senior meteorologist at the IMO , wrote in 2012 that his office was never advised as to the reason for them .
Furthermore , Jónsson @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in error in the case of Reykjavík… ” And when asked if the IMO intended to modify its data to match that of NASA ’ s/NOAA ’ s , Jónsson replied : “ no ” .
Years later , Jónsson suspiciously flipped his story , going from “ the corrections are grossly in error ” to “ the adjustments are quite sound ” — and no explanation for this change of heart was given .
And just as suspiciously , after the heat that followed NASA ’ s Icelandic temperature tampering debacle , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quietly stopped adjusting Reykjavík ’ s data , without comment — thus confirming the removal of the 1940 ’ s warmth was without justification .
Temperature adjustments aren ’ t just confined to the Eastern Arctic , of course .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Exposed: NASA/NOAA Erased The Arctic’s 1940’s ‘Warming Blip’
Written by Cap Allon
Tony Heller’s website realclimatescience.com is a one-stop-shop for exposing government agency data-fudging. For decades, NASA/NOAA has been cooling the past so as to create a fake warming trend — all in a desperate attempt to sustain their failing AGW theory.
Furthermore, and not to get too personal here, but why are the scientists at the heart of the fraud such slimy, thin-skinned wusses–desperate to evade scrutiny at all costs? What do they have to hide?
Case in point, watch this embarrassing interview with NASA’s Gavin Schmidt. Schmidt only agreed to speak if it “wasn’t a debate.”
And while I urge you watch the entire video, particularly the parts with the excellent Dr. Roy Spencer (a real climate scientist btw), skip to 2:00 and then to 6:30 if you’re interested in Schmidt’s “la la la, I’m not listening to you” evading tactics.
So NASA refuses to debate an issue which supposedly negatively impacts every living organism on the planet — and 2013 should be considered the good old days.
Now, the climate fraudsters have worked a position where so-called skeptics have no platform at all. Today, even this kind of non-debate would never be agreed to.
But looking at the ever-mounting case against NASA/NOAA, re their temperature graphs, they probably have good reason to evade scrutiny.
Serving as just one example, government agencies have been erasing the 1940s warmth in the Eastern Arctic for decades, writes Tony Heller.
This is what the raw data for Iceland’s capital Reykjavík looks like:
And this is what the data looks like after NASA made its adjustments:
Note the tactic — cool the past in order to fabricate a warming trend where there was none before:
Removing the warmth of the 1940s (without any justification) was discussed by the world’s leading climate experts in this Climategate email:
Those at the Icelandic Met Office (IMO) couldn’t understand the adjustments.
Trausti Jónsson, a senior meteorologist at the IMO, wrote in 2012 that his office was never advised as to the reason for them.
Furthermore, Jónsson said the temperature corrections “are grossly in error in the case of Reykjavík…” And when asked if the IMO intended to modify its data to match that of NASA’s/NOAA’s, Jónsson replied: “no”.
Years later, Jónsson suspiciously flipped his story, going from “the corrections are grossly in error” to “the adjustments are quite sound” — and no explanation for this change of heart was given.
And just as suspiciously, after the heat that followed NASA’s Icelandic temperature tampering debacle, Schmidt and his band of merry frauds quietly stopped adjusting Reykjavík’s data, without comment — thus confirming the removal of the 1940’s warmth was without justification.
Temperature adjustments aren’t just confined to the Eastern Arctic, of course.
Government book-cooking encompasses the entire globe.
Read rest at ElectroVerse
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-07-15--Massive COVID-19 Data Fraud Uncovered in Florida

Local media showing the old-school value of the Fourth Estate .
Unlike national media who have abandoned all pretense of journalism , there are still a few regional outlets who do the deep digging to discover the truth and reveal the lies .
Fox35 Orlando started digging-in to COVID testing data , and what they found was massive , and seemingly purposeful , fraud behind the numbers .
“ The report showed that Orlando Health had a 98 percent positivity rate .
However , when FOX 35 News contacted the hospital , they confirmed errors in the report .
Orlando @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 9.4 percent , not 98 percent as in the report ; ” and that ’ s just one example .
WATCH : ORLANDO – FOX35 [ … ] News investigated these astronomical numbers , contacting every local location mentioned in the report .
The report showed that Orlando Health had a 98 percent positivity rate .
However , when FOX 35 News contacted the hospital , they confirmed errors in the report .
Orlando Health ’ s positivity rate is only 9.4 percent , not 98 percent as in the report .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s Medical Center had a positivity rate of 76 percent .
A spokesperson for the VA told FOX 35 News on Tuesday that this does not reflect their numbers and that the positivity rate for the center is actually 6 percent .
FOX 35 News went on to speak with the Florida Department of Health on Tuesday .
They confirmed that although private and public laboratories are required to report positive and negative results to the state immediately , some have not .
Specifically , they said that some smaller , private @ @ @ @ @ @ @ data to the state .
“ The Department immediately began working with those labs to ensure that all results were being reported in order to provide comprehensive and transparent data , ” a spokesperson for the Florida Department of Health said .
“ As the state continues to receive results from various labs , the Department will continue educating these labs on proper protocol for reporting COVID-19 test results.
” ( READ MORE ) PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office @ @ @ @ @ @ @ WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Massive COVID-19 Data Fraud Uncovered in Florida
Written by theconservativetreehouse.com
Local media showing the old-school value of the Fourth Estate. Unlike national media who have abandoned all pretense of journalism, there are still a few regional outlets who do the deep digging to discover the truth and reveal the lies.
Fox35 Orlando started digging-in to COVID testing data, and what they found was massive, and seemingly purposeful, fraud behind the numbers. “The report showed that Orlando Health had a 98 percent positivity rate. However, when FOX 35 News contacted the hospital, they confirmed errors in the report. Orlando Health’s positivity rate is only 9.4 percent, not 98 percent as in the report;” and that’s just one example. WATCH:
ORLANDO – FOX35 […] News investigated these astronomical numbers, contacting every local location mentioned in the report. The report showed that Orlando Health had a 98 percent positivity rate. However, when FOX 35 News contacted the hospital, they confirmed errors in the report. Orlando Health’s positivity rate is only 9.4 percent, not 98 percent as in the report.
The report also showed that the Orlando Veteran’s Medical Center had a positivity rate of 76 percent. A spokesperson for the VA told FOX 35 News on Tuesday that this does not reflect their numbers and that the positivity rate for the center is actually 6 percent. FOX 35 News went on to speak with the Florida Department of Health on Tuesday. They confirmed that although private and public laboratories are required to report positive and negative results to the state immediately, some have not. Specifically, they said that some smaller, private labs were not reporting negative test result data to the state. “The Department immediately began working with those labs to ensure that all results were being reported in order to provide comprehensive and transparent data,” a spokesperson for the Florida Department of Health said. “As the state continues to receive results from various labs, the Department will continue educating these labs on proper protocol for reporting COVID-19 test results.” (READ MORE) *** PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-07-16--The COVID-19 Dead Cat Strategy

The COVID-19 Dead Cat Strategy

Lynton Crosby is famously credited with the invention of the ‘ dead cat ’ strategy .
The dead cat is , of course , metaphorical .
It represents a political tool used to manipulate discourse and public attention away from matters and issues which could and probably would cause light to be shone on government policy failures and mistakes .
Mr. Crosby has made a successful career of manipulating public opinion in Australia , the UK , Sri Lanka and New Zealand to name but a few governments .
Boris Johnson , a man of little substance but substantial cunning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the 2008 and 2012 London Mayoral elections and opined on Crosby ’ s advice : “ The key point , says my Australian friend , is that everyone will shout , ‘ Jeez , mate , there ’ s a dead cat on the table !
’ In other words , they will be talking about the dead cat – the thing you want them to talk about – and they will not be talking about the issue that has been causing you so much grief.
” COVID19 has now slipped silently @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the community in half-empty hospitals and poorly staffed care homes to ‘ cases ’ , ‘ virus spread ’ , ‘ second waves ’ and ‘ face masks ’ amongst other nonsense .
The ‘ dead cat ’ is lying prostate on the table of public awareness distracting us from the true crimes against humanity the ‘ lockdown ’ policy created .
In Scotland there have been 4,173 deaths registered where COVID-19 was ‘ mentioned ’ on the deaths certificate .
This amounts to 0.076 % of a total population of ~5.5 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ best disingenuous and at worst , an outright fabrication .
The figure is obtained from the National Records of Scotland ( NRS ) .
They include deaths where “ Death certificate states presumed or suspected corona virus 2019 was relevant to cause of death.
” Health Protection Scotland ( HPS ) only counts deaths from COVID-19 where there has been a positive test .
Their figure is 2,488 .
From the governments own published figures using the NRS source : 43 % of deaths were in the over 85 years age group .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the over 65 years age group .
COVID-19 deaths in hospital were reported as 1,744 .
Hospitals were working at a vastly reduced rate .
In week ending 19th April Hospital Admissions were 8,256 compared to an historic average of 15,450 .
In the same week , A & E attendances were 12,892 compared to an historic average of 28,161 .
Nearly 2,000 people were left to die at home with no hospital treatment available despite the NHS working at half capacity .
Now we know why there is a ‘ dead cat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ table .
It distracts from the extraordinary failure of government policies by locking down 99.9 % of people who were not going to be affected by a rather benign virus .
Look at the age groups of those who died .
Look at the numbers .
Then explain to me why ‘ lockdown ’ was not responsible for these deaths .
It is in Care Homes that government policies have been shown to be most incompetent .
I do not generalise from the particular failures in Scotland to universal failures as this report @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this fiasco .
This is where our ire should be directed .
Everything else is distraction and misdirection .
Governments and the mass media have quietly skulked out of the ICU and into the supermarkets and the shopping malls .
As the dust settles , expect to see the words ‘ in hindsight ’ spouted from their lying treacherous mouths .
As for the First Minister of Scotland and her entourage ?
Well Burns had a term for them .
“ Such a parcel of rogues in this Nation ” .
A few @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Scotland .
I ’ m afraid they are only basic graphs from a python data frame created in pandas .
Interactive graphs for Scotland showing the wider effect of lockdown can be found here .
If you really want a laugh read this report from Imperial College on COVID-19 testing .
About the author : Graeme McMillan graduated with Honours from Edinburgh University ( Politics , Philosophy and Economics ) then gained further qualifications in Business Analysis , Project management , Statistics and Programming .
He has had a long career in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , geological modelling and computer systems management and programming .
He then moved to the metals and minerals sector developing simulation modelling of materials handling ( scrap , slag , semi-finished and finished products ) as well as financial modelling of large mining and steel plant projects .
Latterly , he ran his company ’ s Middle East and North African division .
Graeme is now retired .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

The COVID-19 Dead Cat Strategy
Written by Graeme McMillan
Lynton Crosby is famously credited with the invention of the ‘dead cat’ strategy. The dead cat is, of course, metaphorical. It represents a political tool used to manipulate discourse and public attention away from matters and issues which could and probably would cause light to be shone on government policy failures and mistakes.
Mr. Crosby has made a successful career of manipulating public opinion in Australia, the UK, Sri Lanka and New Zealand to name but a few governments.
Boris Johnson, a man of little substance but substantial cunning, employed Crosby as a political advisor for the 2008 and 2012 London Mayoral elections and opined on Crosby’s advice:
“The key point, says my Australian friend, is that everyone will shout, ‘Jeez, mate, there’s a dead cat on the table!’ In other words, they will be talking about the dead cat – the thing you want them to talk about – and they will not be talking about the issue that has been causing you so much grief.”
COVID19 has now slipped silently from the deaths of very old members of the community in half-empty hospitals and poorly staffed care homes to ‘cases’, ‘virus spread’, ‘second waves’ and ‘face masks’ amongst other nonsense.
The ‘dead cat’ is lying prostate on the table of public awareness distracting us from the true crimes against humanity the ‘lockdown’ policy created.
In Scotland there have been 4,173 deaths registered where COVID-19 was ‘mentioned’ on the deaths certificate.
This amounts to 0.076% of a total population of ~5.5 million.
Even this figure is at best disingenuous and at worst, an outright fabrication. The figure is obtained from the National Records of Scotland (NRS). They include deaths where “Death certificate states presumed or suspected corona virus 2019 was relevant to cause of death.”
Health Protection Scotland (HPS) only counts deaths from COVID-19 where there has been a positive test. Their figure is 2,488.
From the governments own published figures using the NRS source:
“There were 2,412excess deaths in care homes (62%above averagefor the time of year), 2,527excess deaths at home or in non-institutional settings (55% above average) whilst after an early peak, hospital deaths fell below average levels in week 19 (4–10May) and are now 72 (<1%) below average levels for the period covering weeks 12-27.”
43% of deaths were in the over 85 years age group.
92% of all deaths were in the over 65 years age group.
Scottish hospitals saw a decrease in deaths involving:
Cancer -575
Dementia -135
Circulatory -480
Respiratory -481
Other -196
A total of -1,919
COVID-19 deaths in hospital were reported as 1,744.
Hospitals were working at a vastly reduced rate. In week ending 19th April Hospital Admissions were 8,256 compared to an historic average of 15,450.
In the same week, A&E attendances were 12,892 compared to an historic average of 28,161.
Nearly 2,000 people were left to die at home with no hospital treatment available despite the NHS working at half capacity.
Now we know why there is a ‘dead cat’ wearing a gas mask on the table.
It distracts from the extraordinary failure of government policies by locking down 99.9% of people who were not going to be affected by a rather benign virus. Look at the age groups of those who died. Look at the numbers. Then explain to me why ‘lockdown’ was not responsible for these deaths. It is in Care Homes that government policies have been shown to be most incompetent.
I do not generalise from the particular failures in Scotland to universal failures as this report from Canada is a common thread throughout this fiasco.
This is where our ire should be directed. Everything else is distraction and misdirection.
Governments and the mass media have quietly skulked out of the ICU and into the supermarkets and the shopping malls.
As the dust settles, expect to see the words ‘in hindsight’ spouted from their lying treacherous mouths.
As for the First Minister of Scotland and her entourage? Well Burns had a term for them. “Such a parcel of rogues in this Nation”.
Notes
A few graphs are presented below which relate only to Scotland. I’m afraid they are only basic graphs from a python data frame created in pandas. Interactive graphs for Scotland showing the wider effect of lockdown can be found here. If you really want a laugh read this report from Imperial College on COVID-19 testing.
About the author: Graeme McMillan graduated with Honours from Edinburgh University (Politics, Philosophy and Economics) then gained further qualifications in Business Analysis, Project management, Statistics and Programming. He has had a long career in the UK mining industry in mine planning, geological modelling and computer systems management and programming. He then moved to the metals and minerals sector developing simulation modelling of materials handling (scrap, slag, semi-finished and finished products) as well as financial modelling of large mining and steel plant projects. Latterly, he ran his company’s Middle East and North African division. Graeme is now retired.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-07-16--The COVID-19 Panic Shows Us Why Science Needs Skeptics

The COVID-19 Panic Shows Us Why Science Needs Skeptics The dumpster fire of COVID predictions has shown exactly why it ’ s important to sustain and nurture skeptics , lest we blunder into scientific monoculture and groupthink .
And yet the explosion of “ cancel culture ” intolerance of any opinion that doesn ’ t fit a shrinking “ 3 x 5 card ” of right-think risks destroying the very tolerance and science that sustains our civilization .
Since World War II , America has suffered two respiratory pandemics comparable to COVID-19 : the 1958 “ Asian flu , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” In neither case did we shut down the economy—people were simply more careful .
Not all that careful , of course—Jimi Hendrix was playing at Woodstock in the middle of the 1969 pandemic , and social distancing wasn ’ t really a thing in the “ Summer of Love.
” And yet COVID-19 was very different thanks to a single “ buggy mess ” of a computer prediction from one Neil Ferguson , a British epidemiologist given to hysterical overestimates of deaths , from mad cow to bird flu to H1N1 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ deaths in America unless we basically shut down the economy .
Panicked policymakers took his prediction as gospel , dressed as it was in the cloak of science .
Now , long after governments plunged half the world into a Great Depression , those panicked revisions are being quietly revised down by an order of magnitude , now suggesting a final tally comparable to 1958 and 1969 .
COVID-19 would have been a deadly pandemic with or without Ferguson ’ s fantasies , but had we known the true scale and parameters of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tailored means to both safeguard the elderly and at-risk , while sustaining the wider economy .
After all , economists have long known that mass unemployment and widespread bankruptcies carry enormous health consequences that are very real to the victims suffering drained life savings , ruined businesses , broken families , widespread mental and physical health deterioration , even suicide .
COVID-19 has illustrated the importance of free and robust inquiry .
After all , panicked politicians facing media accusations of “ killing grandma ” aren ’ t in a very good position @ @ @ @ @ @ @ need intellectual ammunition .
Not only to show them which path is best , but to bolster them when a left-wing media establishment attacks .
Moreover , voters need this ammunition so they can actually tell the politicians what to do .
This means two things : debate that is transparent , and debate that is tolerant of skeptics .
Transparency means data and computer code open to public scrutiny as the minimum requirement for any study that is used to justify policy , from lockdowns to carbon taxes to whatever comes next @ @ @ @ @ @ @ verifiable facts , code that does what it says it does , and the ensuing decision-making process must be transparent and open to the public .
One former Indian bureaucrat put it well : Even more important than transparency , debate must be tolerant of alternative opinions .
This means ideas that are wrong , offensive , even dangerous , have to be tolerated , even celebrated .
By all means , refute them—most alternative hypotheses are completely wrong , so it shouldn ’ t be hard to simply refute them without censorship @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the essence of science—to generate hypotheses testable by anybody , not just licensed “ experts.
” Whether we are faced with a new crisis , a new policy innovation , or simply designing a better mousetrap , groupthink and censorship are recipes for disaster and stagnation , while transparency and tolerance of new ideas are the very essence of progress .
Indeed , it is largely this scientific tolerance that allowed us to rise up from the long , brutal darkness of poverty .
As Francis Bacon observed three hundred years ago , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from prestigious “ learned ” insiders , rather progress comes from the questioner , the tinkerer , the skeptic .
Indeed , every major scientific advance challenged the “ settled science ” of its day , and was often denounced as pernicious and false , even dangerous .
The modern blood transfusion , for example , was developed in the late 1600s , then banned for nearly a century by a hostile medical establishment , “ canceling ” tens of millions of lives at the altar of groupthink and hostility to skeptics .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ our problems are old ones , and also encouraging that our solution is both time-tested and simple : transparency and tolerance .
After all , the very reason our culture elevates science is because it is built on a millennia-long evolutionary “ battle of ideas ” in which theories are constantly tested and retested in a delightfully endless search for ever better understanding .
This implies there is no such thing as “ settled science ” —the phrase itself is contrary to the scientific method .
In reality , science is not some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it ’ s a gnarled mutant sewer rat that takes all comers because it ’ s been burned , cut , run over , crushed , run through the wood chipper , and survived .
That ugly beast is our salvation , not the gleaming palace where we bow down to whichever random guy has the biggest degree in the room .
Only with free inquiry for the most unpopular , offensive , dangerous , and , yes , wrong ideas imaginable does that power sustain .
And if we break that , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ catastrophes that , like failed golden ages of the past , return us to the nasty , brutish , and very short lives that have been humanity ’ s norm .
Whether pandemic , climate change , “ institutional racism , ” or whatever new crisis they conjure next , we have a fundamental right to tenaciously defend the transparency and tolerance that constitutes science itself so that it remains among humanity ’ s crowning achievements , and so that we preserve this golden age that would astound our ancestors .
About the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ senior economist at the Montreal Economic Institute .
He blogs at Profits of Chaos .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

The COVID-19 Panic Shows Us Why Science Needs Skeptics
Written by Peter St.Onge
The dumpster fire of COVID predictions has shown exactly why it’s important to sustain and nurture skeptics, lest we blunder into scientific monoculture and groupthink. And yet the explosion of “cancel culture” intolerance of any opinion that doesn’t fit a shrinking “3 x 5 card” of right-think risks destroying the very tolerance and science that sustains our civilization.
Since World War II, America has suffered two respiratory pandemics comparable to COVID-19: the 1958 “Asian flu,” then the 1969 “Hong Kong flu.” In neither case did we shut down the economy—people were simply more careful. Not all that careful, of course—Jimi Hendrix was playing at Woodstock in the middle of the 1969 pandemic, and social distancing wasn’t really a thing in the “Summer of Love.”
And yet COVID-19 was very different thanks to a single “buggy mess” of a computer prediction from one Neil Ferguson, a British epidemiologist given to hysterical overestimates of deaths, from mad cow to bird flu to H1N1.
For COVID-19, Ferguson predicted 3 million deaths in America unless we basically shut down the economy. Panicked policymakers took his prediction as gospel, dressed as it was in the cloak of science.
Now, long after governments plunged half the world into a Great Depression, those panicked revisions are being quietly revised down by an order of magnitude, now suggesting a final tally comparable to 1958 and 1969.
COVID-19 would have been a deadly pandemic with or without Ferguson’s fantasies, but had we known the true scale and parameters of the threat we might have chosen better tailored means to both safeguard the elderly and at-risk, while sustaining the wider economy. After all, economists have long known that mass unemployment and widespread bankruptcies carry enormous health consequences that are very real to the victims suffering drained life savings, ruined businesses, broken families, widespread mental and physical health deterioration, even suicide.
Decisions involve tradeoffs.
COVID-19 has illustrated the importance of free and robust inquiry. After all, panicked politicians facing media accusations of “killing grandma” aren’t in a very good position to evaluate these tradeoffs, and they need intellectual ammunition. Not only to show them which path is best, but to bolster them when a left-wing media establishment attacks.
Moreover, voters need this ammunition so they can actually tell the politicians what to do. This means two things: debate that is transparent, and debate that is tolerant of skeptics.
Transparency means data and computer code open to public scrutiny as the minimum requirement for any study that is used to justify policy, from lockdowns to carbon taxes to whatever comes next. These studies must be based on verifiable facts, code that does what it says it does, and the ensuing decision-making process must be transparent and open to the public.
One former Indian bureaucrat put it well:
“Emergency situations like this pandemic should require a far higher—and not lower—level of scrutiny,” since policy choices have such tremendous impact. “This suggests a need for democracies to strengthen their critical thinking capacity by creating an independent ‘Black Hat’ institution whose purpose would be to question any technical foundations of government decisions.”
Even more important than transparency, debate must be tolerant of alternative opinions. This means ideas that are wrong, offensive, even dangerous, have to be tolerated, even celebrated. By all means, refute them—most alternative hypotheses are completely wrong, so it shouldn’t be hard to simply refute them without censorship. This, after all, is the essence of science—to generate hypotheses testable by anybody, not just licensed “experts.”
Whether we are faced with a new crisis, a new policy innovation, or simply designing a better mousetrap, groupthink and censorship are recipes for disaster and stagnation, while transparency and tolerance of new ideas are the very essence of progress. Indeed, it is largely this scientific tolerance that allowed us to rise up from the long, brutal darkness of poverty.
As Francis Bacon observed three hundred years ago, innovation and new knowledge do not come from prestigious “learned” insiders, rather progress comes from the questioner, the tinkerer, the skeptic.
“The industry of artificers maketh some small improvement of things invented; and chance sometimes in experimenting maketh us to stumble upon somewhat which is new; but all the disputation of the learned never brought to light one effect of nature before unknown.” (In Praise of Knowledge, vol. 1, [1740] 1850)
Indeed, every major scientific advance challenged the “settled science” of its day, and was often denounced as pernicious and false, even dangerous. The modern blood transfusion, for example, was developed in the late 1600s, then banned for nearly a century by a hostile medical establishment, “canceling” tens of millions of lives at the altar of groupthink and hostility to skeptics.
It’s comforting to know that our problems are old ones, and also encouraging that our solution is both time-tested and simple: transparency and tolerance. After all, the very reason our culture elevates science is because it is built on a millennia-long evolutionary “battle of ideas” in which theories are constantly tested and retested in a delightfully endless search for ever better understanding.
This implies there is no such thing as “settled science”—the phrase itself is contrary to the scientific method. In reality, science is not some billion-dollar gleaming palace in Bethesda, rather it’s a gnarled mutant sewer rat that takes all comers because it’s been burned, cut, run over, crushed, run through the wood chipper, and survived. That ugly beast is our salvation, not the gleaming palace where we bow down to whichever random guy has the biggest degree in the room.
Only with free inquiry for the most unpopular, offensive, dangerous, and, yes, wrong ideas imaginable does that power sustain. And if we break that, we can expect a series of rapid catastrophes that, like failed golden ages of the past, return us to the nasty, brutish, and very short lives that have been humanity’s norm.
Whether pandemic, climate change, “institutional racism,” or whatever new crisis they conjure next, we have a fundamental right to tenaciously defend the transparency and tolerance that constitutes science itself so that it remains among humanity’s crowning achievements, and so that we preserve this golden age that would astound our ancestors.
About the author: Peter St. Onge is the senior economist at the Montreal Economic Institute. He blogs at Profits of Chaos.
Read more at mises.org
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-07-16--Our moon is 85 million years younger than we thought

Our moon is 85 million years younger than we thought It turns out is a little younger than scientists previously thought — about 85 million years younger , to be precise .
In a new study , researchers at the German Aerospace Center found out that , not only did the moon once have a , but our rocky satellite also formed later than scientists previously expected .
Billions of years ago , a Mars-size protoplanet smashed into the young Earth and , amid the debris and cosmic rubble , a new rocky body formed — our moon .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the timeline of the moon ’ s formation .
While scientists have previously thought that this moon-forming collision happened 4.51 billion years ago , the new work pegged the moon ’ s birth at only 4.425 billion years ago .
“ By comparing the measured composition of the moon ’ s rocks with the predicted composition of the magma ocean from our model , we were able to trace the evolution of the ocean back to its starting point , the time at which the moon was formed , ” study co-author Sabrina @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Aerospace Center , .
These findings , which show that the moon formed 4.425 billion years ago ( give or take 25 million years ) , agree with previous research that aligned the moon ’ s formation with the formation of Earth ’ s metallic core , according to the statement .
“ This is the first time that the age of the moon can be directly linked to an event that occurred at the very end of the Earth ’ s formation , namely the formation of the core , ” Thorsten @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Planetology at the University of Münster in Germany , said in the same statement .
These findings were described in a new study published on July 10 in the journal Science Advances .
Email Chelsea Gohd at cgohd @ space.com or follow her on Twitter @ chelsea_gohd .
Follow us on Twitter Spacedotcom and on Facebook .
Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions , night sky and more !
And if you have a news tip , correction or comment , let us know at : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Our moon is 85 million years younger than we thought
Written by Chelsea Gohd
It turns out the moon is a little younger than scientists previously thought — about 85 million years younger, to be precise. In a new study, researchers at the German Aerospace Center found out that, not only did the moon once have a massive, fiery magma ocean , but our rocky satellite also formed later than scientists previously expected.
Billions of years ago, a Mars-size protoplanet smashed into the young Earth and, amid the debris and cosmic rubble, a new rocky body formed — our moon. In this new work, the researchers reconstructed the timeline of the moon’s formation. While scientists have previously thought that this moon-forming collision happened 4.51 billion years ago, the new work pegged the moon’s birth at only 4.425 billion years ago.
To determine this 85-million-year error in the moon’s age, the team used mathematical models to calculate the composition of the moon over time. Based on the idea that the moon was host to a massive magma ocean, the researchers calculated how the minerals that formed as the magma cooled solidified changed over time. By following the timeline of the magma ocean, the scientists were able to trace their way back to the moon’s formation.
“By comparing the measured composition of the moon’s rocks with the predicted composition of the magma ocean from our model, we were able to trace the evolution of the ocean back to its starting point, the time at which the moon was formed,” study co-author Sabrina Schwinger, a researcher at the German Aerospace Center, said in a statement .
These findings, which show that the moon formed 4.425 billion years ago (give or take 25 million years), agree with previous research that aligned the moon’s formation with the formation of Earth’s metallic core, according to the statement.
“This is the first time that the age of the moon can be directly linked to an event that occurred at the very end of the Earth’s formation, namely the formation of the core,” Thorsten Kleine, a professor at the Institute of Planetology at the University of Münster in Germany, said in the same statement.
These findings were described in a new study published on July 10 in the journal Science Advances.
Email Chelsea Gohd at cgohd@space.com or follow her on Twitter @chelsea_gohd. Follow us on Twitter @ Spacedotcom and on Facebook.
Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com. Read more at www.space.com **** PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-07-16--Healthcare in Sweden: A Model of Elderly Care

Healthcare in Sweden has several things going for it that would make it a model of elder care .
Since 1980 , for example , the health care requirements of the elder generation in Sweden have gone down and have miraculously stayed down , something that very few nations can say .
Yet Swedish elders are also living longer than their counterparts in most of the world .
While many nations , especially the United States , are left biting their nails in the face of a rapidly aging society and higher healthcare costs , Sweden just had theirs manicured @ @ @ @ @ @ @ care of the elderly is worth looking into .
Sweden has roughly 9.8 million citizens .
Just shy of 2 million are over the age of 65 .
That is 20 % of their current population .
By the year 2040 , 1 in every 4 Swedes will be over the age of 65 , yet they aren ’ t breaking a sweat .
Well , actually they are .
It is just the real kind of sweat .
When looking at healthcare in Sweden and why Sweden has such healthy and robust @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a high priority in the following areas : • Priority is given to aging in place • Accessibility to home health and practical help services • Timely treatment ; doctor ’ s appointments within 7 days and no more than 90 days to see a specialist or have an operation .
Healthcare in Sweden is a decentralized national healthcare system with a national center for research and development , a robust national pension agency , and many other associations to help the elderly transition with grace and dignity into their final years .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the population demographic swing , but by and large they are just buffing a little here and reshaping a little there .
Let ’ s take a closer look at the way Sweden has prioritized aging in their society because it has more to do with the way they view their elders than it does with policy .
Sweden implemented the Adel reform in 1992 .
This major reform shifted responsibility for elderly care to local municipalities , with county councils overseeing the responsibility to provide home health services rather than a centralized @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ greater good.
” As a whole , Sweden allocates 3.6 % of their total GDP to municipal long-term elderly care .
These funds are then dispersed to raise the competency of municipality “ care managers ” and workers and to provide financial incentives to hospitals to reduce the number of unnecessary hospitalizations and re-hospitalizations .
They also deliver pre-cooked meals to homes as part of an aging in place incentive .
The emphasis is placed on community involvement , citizen empowerment , and public accountability .
As a result , Sweden has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of their elderly population aging in place .
This has been a major factor in the success of the healthcare in Sweden for the elderly .
Sweden is taking a few extra steps to prepare for a growing elderly demographic .
They are working on increasing the pension claiming age from 61 to 62 and possibly to 63 ; a shift not seen as adverse by many Swedish seniors who naturally lead less sedentary lives than Americans .
Part of this may be due to the doctor prescribed physical activity .
A person @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s office with a prescription for Crestor and for a specific type of daily exercise with follow-up care and testing .
Sweden is also looking at community housing policies for elderly who find it appealing .
But all of Sweden ’ s elderly care policy is shifting towards local decision-making , with emphasis placed on quality of life for the elderly and their families .
The public housing option would maintain a high quality of standards while keeping the priority on aging in place .
As other nations , including America , drift @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are struggling underneath one , it appears that the key to making single-payer healthcare successful is decentralization .
When citizens have a greater voice in health care decision making , greater access to home help services and needed procedures , freedom to choose which municipality and providers they see and have an entire community that values the contribution to families and society that the elderly still provide , aging takes on a new meaning-or rather a renewed one .
Read more : Dementia Villages in the Netherlands Sweden .
( 2016 ) .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ https : //sweden.se/society/elderly-care-in-sweden/ .
Last Visited March 3 , 2016 .
Global Health Aging .
( August 3 , 2014 ) .
Sweden : A Role Model for Elderly Care .
Available at http : //globalhealthaging.org/2014/08/03/sweden-a-role-model-for-elderly-care/ .
Last Visited March 3 , 2016 .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Healthcare in Sweden: A Model of Elderly Care
Written by Joy Intriago
Healthcare in Sweden has several things going for it that would make it a model of elder care. Since 1980, for example, the health care requirements of the elder generation in Sweden have gone down and have miraculously stayed down, something that very few nations can say.
Yet Swedish elders are also living longer than their counterparts in most of the world. While many nations, especially the United States, are left biting their nails in the face of a rapidly aging society and higher healthcare costs, Sweden just had theirs manicured. Therefore, the way Sweden takes care of the elderly is worth looking into.
Swedish Statistics
Sweden has roughly 9.8 million citizens. Just shy of 2 million are over the age of 65. That is 20{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of their current population. By the year 2040, 1 in every 4 Swedes will be over the age of 65, yet they aren’t breaking a sweat. Well, actually they are. It is just the real kind of sweat. When looking at healthcare in Sweden and why Sweden has such healthy and robust older people you find they have placed a high priority in the following areas:
Preventive care
Priority is given to aging in place
Accessibility to home health and practical help services
Physician prescribed physical activity
Timely treatment; doctor’s appointments within 7 days and no more than 90 days to see a specialist or have an operation.
Healthcare in Sweden is a decentralized national healthcare system with a national center for research and development, a robust national pension agency, and many other associations to help the elderly transition with grace and dignity into their final years. They are also facing upcoming challenges to the population demographic swing, but by and large they are just buffing a little here and reshaping a little there.
Let’s take a closer look at the way Sweden has prioritized aging in their society because it has more to do with the way they view their elders than it does with policy.
Devolution to Grass Roots, Local Participation
Sweden implemented the Adel reform in 1992. This major reform shifted responsibility for elderly care to local municipalities, with county councils overseeing the responsibility to provide home health services rather than a centralized system making general policy decisions for the “greater good.” As a whole, Sweden allocates 3.6{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of their total GDP to municipal long-term elderly care. These funds are then dispersed to raise the competency of municipality “care managers” and workers and to provide financial incentives to hospitals to reduce the number of unnecessary hospitalizations and re-hospitalizations. They also deliver pre-cooked meals to homes as part of an aging in place incentive. The emphasis is placed on community involvement, citizen empowerment, and public accountability.
As a result, Sweden has been able to keep over 90{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of their elderly population aging in place. This has been a major factor in the success of the healthcare in Sweden for the elderly.
Growing Forward
Sweden is taking a few extra steps to prepare for a growing elderly demographic. They are working on increasing the pension claiming age from 61 to 62 and possibly to 63; a shift not seen as adverse by many Swedish seniors who naturally lead less sedentary lives than Americans. Part of this may be due to the doctor prescribed physical activity. A person could walk out of the doctor’s office with a prescription for Crestor and for a specific type of daily exercise with follow-up care and testing.
…emphasis placed on quality of life for the elderly and their families.
Sweden is also looking at community housing policies for elderly who find it appealing. But all of Sweden’s elderly care policy is shifting towards local decision-making, with emphasis placed on quality of life for the elderly and their families. The public housing option would maintain a high quality of standards while keeping the priority on aging in place.
As other nations, including America, drift towards a nationalized healthcare system, or are struggling underneath one, it appears that the key to making single-payer healthcare successful is decentralization. When citizens have a greater voice in health care decision making, greater access to home help services and needed procedures, freedom to choose which municipality and providers they see and have an entire community that values the contribution to families and society that the elderly still provide, aging takes on a new meaning-or rather a renewed one.
Read more: Dementia Villages in the Netherlands
Sources
Sweden. (2016). Elderly Care in Sweden. Available at https://sweden.se/society/elderly-care-in-sweden/. Last Visited March 3, 2016.
Global Health Aging. (August 3, 2014). Sweden: A Role Model for Elderly Care. Available at http://globalhealthaging.org/2014/08/03/sweden-a-role-model-for-elderly-care/. Last Visited March 3, 2016.
***
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-07-15--Manufacturer: Our Face Masks Mandated by UK Govt Useless for CV19

Manufacturer : Our Face Masks Mandated by UK Govt Useless for CV19 The same type of face masks that the UK government is mandating people wear in shops from July 24 onwards to protect against the spread of coronavirus specifically state on their packaging that they don ’ t protect against coronavirus .
Earlier this week , the government confirmed that anyone caught not wearing a mask when entering a shop or supermarket will be subject to a police fine of £100 , prompting the Chair of the London Metropolitan Police Foundation to complain that this would be totally unenforcable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cloth masks , scarves or other textile items that don ’ t require the use of hands to hold them in place are acceptable forms of protection against COVID-19 .
One problem with that , the packaging on these kind of cloth masks specifically states that they don ’ t protect against COVID-19 .
“ This product is an ear loop mask .
This product is not a respirator and will not provide any protection against COVID-19 ( coronavirus ) or any other viruses or contaminants , ” states the packaging on a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sold .
Skeptics have also pointed out that people continually touching potentially infected masks and then touching surfaces could even exacerbate the spread of coronavirus .
“ Apart from everything else , the only coverings the Government is insisting on are cloth ones , which every man and his dog knows are COMPLETELY USELESS , ” writes Toby Young .
“ As Allison Pearson says in her excellent comment piece in today ’ s Telegraph , “ anything other than tight-fitting , surgical-grade masks are utterly pointless – like trying to stop a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I mean , the evidence that the gold-standard N95 masks are effective in non-healthcare settings is threadbare at best – and they have to be disposed of after a single use.
” “ There is literally no evidence that re-usable cloth masks are effective in community settings .
None .
It ’ s like wearing a tin foil hat in case you get struck by lightening – an ineffective way to protect yourself from an almost non-existent risk .
What has become of us ?
” Health Secretary Matt Hancock said mandating the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more confidence to shop safely and enhance protections for those who work in shops , ” however many have reacted to the law by asserting that they will simply avoid shops altogether .
This will lead to yet more economic devastation , more high street job losses and in the longer term , more poverty and death .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

Manufacturer: Our Face Masks Mandated by UK Govt Useless for CV19
Written by Paul Joseph Watson
The same type of face masks that the UK government is mandating people wear in shops from July 24 onwards to protect against the spread of coronavirus specifically state on their packaging that they don’t protect against coronavirus.
Genius.
Earlier this week, the government confirmed that anyone caught not wearing a mask when entering a shop or supermarket will be subject to a police fine of £100, prompting the Chair of the London Metropolitan Police Foundation to complain that this would be totally unenforceable.
However, the law states that cloth masks, scarves, or other textile items that don’t require the use of hands to hold them in place are acceptable forms of protection against COVID-19.
One problem with that, the packaging on these kinds of cloth masks specifically states that they don’t protect against COVID-19.
“This product is an ear loop mask. This product is not a respirator and will not provide any protection against COVID-19 (coronavirus) or any other viruses or contaminants,” states the packaging on a standard set of cloth masks currently being sold.
Only ‘scientists’ for hire. The rest say they are useless, as do the manufacturers of the masks… pic.twitter.com/1Wb3F2lSHC — Cornubian (@Cornubian2) July 15, 2020
Skeptics have also pointed out that people continually touching potentially infected masks and then touching surfaces could even exacerbate the spread of coronavirus.
“Apart from everything else, the only coverings the Government is insisting on are cloth ones, which every man and his dog knows are COMPLETELY USELESS,” writes Toby Young.
“As Allison Pearson says in her excellent comment piece in today’s Telegraph, “anything other than tight-fitting, surgical-grade masks are utterly pointless – like trying to stop a bullet with a chain-link fence”. I mean, the evidence that the gold-standard N95 masks are effective in non-healthcare settings is threadbare at best – and they have to be disposed of after a single use.”
“There is literally no evidence that re-usable cloth masks are effective in community settings. None. It’s like wearing a tinfoil hat in case you get struck by lightning – an ineffective way to protect yourself from an almost non-existent risk. What has become of us?”
Health Secretary Matt Hancock said mandating the wearing of masks would “give people more confidence to shop safely and enhance protections for those who work in shops,” however many have reacted to the law by asserting that they will simply avoid shops altogether.
This will lead to yet more economic devastation, more high street job losses, and in the longer term, more poverty and death.
Again, genius.
Read more here.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related