principiascientificinternational--2020-05-23--Official CDC Report Puts COVID-19 Death Rate at Just 0.26%

Official CDC Report Puts COVID-19 Death Rate at Just 0.26 % It ’ s official .
Most people are more likely to wind up six feet under because of almost anything else under the sun other than COVID-19 .
The CDC just came out with a report that should be earth-shattering to the narrative of the political class , yet it will go into the thick pile of vital data and information about the virus that is not getting out to the public .
[ 1 ] For the first time , the CDC has attempted to offer a real @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 , and under its most likely scenario , the number is 0.26 % .
Officials estimate a 0.4 % fatality rate among those who are symptomatic and project a 35 % rate of asymptomatic cases among those infected , which drops the overall infection fatality rate ( IFR ) to just 0.26 % — almost exactly where Stanford researchers pegged it a month ago .
Until now , we have been ridiculed for thinking the death rate was that low , as opposed to the 3.4 % estimate of the World Health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the lockdowns .
Now the CDC is agreeing to the lower rate in plain ink .
Plus , ultimately we might find out that the IFR is even lower because numerous studies and hard counts of confined populations have shown a much higher percentage of asymptomatic cases .
Simply adjusting for a 50 % asymptomatic rate would drop their fatality rate to 0.2 % – exactly the rate of fatality Dr. John Ionnidis of Stanford University projected .
More importantly , as I mentioned before , the overall death rate is meaningless @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Given that at least half of the deaths were in nursing homes , a back-of-the-envelope estimate would show that the infection fatality rate for non-nursing home residents would only be 0.1 % or 1 in 1,000 .
And that includes people of all ages and all health statuses outside of nursing homes .
Since nearly all of the deaths are those with comorbidities .
The CDC estimates the death rate from COVID-19 for those under 50 is 1 in 5,000 for those with symptoms , which would be 1 in 6,725 overall , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ die have specific comorbidities or underlying conditions .
Those without them are more likely to die in a car accident .
And schoolchildren , whose lives , mental health , and education we are destroying , are more likely to get struck by lightning .
To put this in perspective , one Twitter commentator juxtaposed the age-separated infection fatality rates in Spain to the average yearly probability of dying of anything for the same age groups , based on data from the Social Security Administration .
He used Spain because we don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ estimate for each age group from any survey in the U.S .
However , we know that Spain fared worse than almost every other country .
This data is actually working with a top-line IFR of 1 % , roughly four times what the CDC estimates for the U.S. , so if anything , the corresponding numbers for the U.S. will be lower .
As you can see , even in Spain , the death rates from COVID-19 for younger people are very low and are well below the annual death rate for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
For children , despite their young age , they are 10-30 times more likely to die from other causes in any given year .
While obviously yearly death rates factor in myriad of causes of death and COVID-19 is just one virus , it still provides much-needed perspective to a public policy response that is completely divorced from the risk for all but the oldest and sickest people in the country .
Also , keep in mind , these numbers represent your chance of dying once you have already contracted the virus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Once you couple the chance of contracting the virus in the first place together with the chance of dying from it , many younger people have a higher chance of dying from a lightning strike .
Four infectious disease doctors in Canada estimate that the individual rate of death from COVID-19 for people under 65 years of age is six per million people , or 0.0006 per cent – 1 in 166,666 , which is “ roughly equivalent to the risk of dying from a motor vehicle accident during the same time period.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ which did have fewer deaths per capita than the U.S. ; however , if you take New York City and its surrounding counties out of the equation , the two countries are pretty much the same .
Also , remember , so much of the death is associated with the suicidal political decisions of certain states and countries to place COVID-19 patients in nursing homes .
An astounding 62 percent of all COVID-19 deaths were in the six states confirmed to have done this , even though they only compose 18 percent of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ entire country and suspended democracy all for a lie , and these people perpetrated the unscientific degree of panic .
Will they ever admit the grave consequences of their error ?
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Official CDC Report Puts COVID-19 Death Rate at Just 0.26%
Written by Daniel Horowitz
It’s official. Most people are more likely to wind up six feet under because of almost anything else under the sun other than COVID-19.
The CDC just came out with a report that should be earth-shattering to the narrative of the political class, yet it will go into the thick pile of vital data and information about the virus that is not getting out to the public. [1]
For the first time, the CDC has attempted to offer a real estimate of the overall death rate for COVID-19, and under its most likely scenario, the number is 0.26{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}. Officials estimate a 0.4{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} fatality rate among those who are symptomatic and project a 35{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} rate of asymptomatic cases among those infected, which drops the overall infection fatality rate (IFR) to just 0.26{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} — almost exactly where Stanford researchers pegged it a month ago.
Until now, we have been ridiculed for thinking the death rate was that low, as opposed to the 3.4{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} estimate of the World Health Organization, which helped drive the panic and the lockdowns. Now the CDC is agreeing to the lower rate in plain ink.
Plus, ultimately we might find out that the IFR is even lower because numerous studies and hard counts of confined populations have shown a much higher percentage of asymptomatic cases. Simply adjusting for a 50{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} asymptomatic rate would drop their fatality rate to 0.2{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} – exactly the rate of fatality Dr. John Ionnidis of Stanford University projected.
More importantly, as I mentioned before, the overall death rate is meaningless because the numbers are so lopsided. Given that at least half of the deaths were in nursing homes, a back-of-the-envelope estimate would show that the infection fatality rate for non-nursing home residents would only be 0.1{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} or 1 in 1,000. And that includes people of all ages and all health statuses outside of nursing homes. Since nearly all of the deaths are those with comorbidities.
The CDC estimates the death rate from COVID-19 for those under 50 is 1 in 5,000 for those with symptoms, which would be 1 in 6,725 overall, but again, almost all those who die have specific comorbidities or underlying conditions. Those without them are more likely to die in a car accident. And schoolchildren, whose lives, mental health, and education we are destroying, are more likely to get struck by lightning.
To put this in perspective, one Twitter commentator juxtaposed the age-separated infection fatality rates in Spain to the average yearly probability of dying of anything for the same age groups, based on data from the Social Security Administration. He used Spain because we don’t have a detailed infection fatality rate estimate for each age group from any survey in the U.S. However, we know that Spain fared worse than almost every other country. This data is actually working with a top-line IFR of 1{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}, roughly four times what the CDC estimates for the U.S., so if anything, the corresponding numbers for the U.S. will be lower.
Gummi Bear @gummibear737 Being alive means there is a risk that you will die in every year of your life. Normally we don’t think about this because the probability is very small. It turns out that even if you are infected with COVID, your increased risk to die vs normal is not very large at all. 169 Twitter Ads info and privacy 96 people are talking about this
As you can see, even in Spain, the death rates from COVID-19 for younger people are very low and are well below the annual death rate for any age group in a given year. For children, despite their young age, they are 10-30 times more likely to die from other causes in any given year.
While obviously yearly death rates factor in myriad of causes of death and COVID-19 is just one virus, it still provides much-needed perspective to a public policy response that is completely divorced from the risk for all but the oldest and sickest people in the country.
Also, keep in mind, these numbers represent your chance of dying once you have already contracted the virus, aka the infection fatality rate. Once you couple the chance of contracting the virus in the first place together with the chance of dying from it, many younger people have a higher chance of dying from a lightning strike.
Four infectious disease doctors in Canada estimate that the individual rate of death from COVID-19 for people under 65 years of age is six per million people, or 0.0006 per cent – 1 in 166,666, which is “roughly equivalent to the risk of dying from a motor vehicle accident during the same time period.”
These numbers are for Canada, which did have fewer deaths per capita than the U.S.; however, if you take New York City and its surrounding counties out of the equation, the two countries are pretty much the same. Also, remember, so much of the death is associated with the suicidal political decisions of certain states and countries to place COVID-19 patients in nursing homes. An astounding 62 percent of all COVID-19 deaths were in the six states confirmed to have done this, even though they only compose 18 percent of the national population.
We destroyed our entire country and suspended democracy all for a lie, and these people perpetrated the unscientific degree of panic. Will they ever admit the grave consequences of their error?
[1] https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html
Read more at www.conservativereview.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-23--BBC historian rejoices over ‘rich white men’ dying from COVID-19

A BBC contributor has lit a powder keg of social media rage after reveling in the fact that wealthy , middle-aged white men died in higher numbers during an epidemic that hit Britain in the 16th century .
Louise Raw , who describes herself as “ resident historian on BBC Radio London , ” announced on Twitter that she had uncovered “ virulent class prejudice still rife in Britain ” while researching the Sweating Sickness of 1528 .
The mysterious disease affected both the very rich and very poor , but Raw took issue with a commentator who described the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Responding to her historical analysis , one person mused how wonderful it would be if pestilence could “ be a bit more selective this time and leave us idle fellows alone ” – a proposition which Raw apparently found quite appetizing .
If only it could be a bit more selective this time and leave us idle fellows alone .
It actually killed very rich , white middle aged men in greater number than anyone else !
Which is obviously terrible 675 people are talking about this “ It actually killed very rich @ @ @ @ @ @ @ number than anyone else !
Which is obviously terrible , ” she replied sarcastically , including a winking smiley face emoji .
Her bold remarks about the ills of “ class prejudice ” provoked a virtual call-to-arms on Twitter .
One comment marveled at how the BBC associates itself with someone who openly applauds death among certain segments of society .
Mmm and if anyone had put a knowing happy emoji in front of the suggestion that any other group had died as a result of pestilence , disease , famine or war @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our embarrassing Orwellian state broadcaster .
But I guess you ’ ll keep your cushy job !
17 people are talking about this Others lashed out at Raw for spreading “ hate ” and purportedly showing the true face of the BBC .
And we know how it ends , every time they gain power .
Their wishes of “ killing ” come true , beyond our wildest nightmares .
With the rise of “ cancel culture , ” comments deemed politically incorrect or offensive have damaged or sometimes even ended the careers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the public spotlight .
However , it appears that Raw has been able to simply ignore her critics without any negative repercussions .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

BBC historian rejoices over ‘rich white men’ dying from COVID-19
Written by rt.com
A BBC contributor has lit a powder keg of social media rage after reveling in the fact that wealthy, middle-aged white men died in higher numbers during an epidemic that hit Britain in the 16th century.
Louise Raw, who describes herself as “resident historian on BBC Radio London,” announced on Twitter that she had uncovered “virulent class prejudice still rife in Britain” while researching the Sweating Sickness of 1528.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-23--Climate Alarmists Fear COVID-19 Autumn Rebound Will Discredit Their Narrative

In a desperate attempt to deny that global warming can bring any significant benefit , climate alarmists have brushed aside assertions that warm temperatures may slow the spread or severity of COVID-19 .
After all , an earlier onset of warm summer temperatures , a later onset of cool autumn temperatures , and warmer temperatures in regions where summers can still remain cool would prove to be global warming benefits if warm temperatures stifle the virus .
But this goes against everything climate alarmists have been peddling about global warming being a one-way street of catastrophic news .
Warmer temperatures @ @ @ @ @ @ @ alarmists but good news for everybody else on the planet .
Let ’ s hope the flattened and receding curve of coronavirus cases here in the United States will continue through the fall and throughout the year .
Nevertheless , advocates of perpetual government restrictions on our personal freedoms warn it is risky to ease government restrictions now because currently , warm temperatures may be masking an inevitable second wave of the virus when temperatures cool in the fall .
Ironically , these advocates tend to be the same people who recently denied @ @ @ @ @ @ @ terrible impacts of the virus .
First , they tell us warm temperatures will do us no good fighting coronavirus .
Then , they tell us to expect a fall rebound when temperatures cool .
Well , which is it ?
Do warmer temperatures inhibit the virus , which reveals another benefit of our modest global warming , or is there no reason to fear an autumn coronavirus rebound ?
Climate alarmists can ’ t have it both ways .
Indeed , the New York Times , Washington Post , CNN , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have repeatedly and condescendingly lectured us that warmer temperatures this summer will not significantly inhibit COVID-19 .
Now , however , as the coronavirus curve has flattened and states begin to reopen , these same media outlets warn us that a potential fall coronavirus rebound makes restoring people ’ s freedoms too reckless and too risky .
From the climate alarmist perspective , the recent decline in coronavirus cases has had nothing to do with the onset of summer .
If that is the case , the worst appears to be behind us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , however , climate alarmists owe the rest of us an apology and an acknowledgment that global warming is benefiting humans in the battle against this global pandemic .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Climate Alarmists Fear COVID-19 Autumn Rebound Will Discredit Their Narrative
Written by James Taylor
In a desperate attempt to deny that global warming can bring any significant benefit, climate alarmists have brushed aside assertions that warm temperatures may slow the spread or severity of COVID-19.
After all, an earlier onset of warm summer temperatures, a later onset of cool autumn temperatures, and warmer temperatures in regions where summers can still remain cool would prove to be global warming benefits if warm temperatures stifle the virus.
But this goes against everything climate alarmists have been peddling about global warming being a one-way street of catastrophic news.
Warmer temperatures stifling COVID-19 is bad news for climate alarmists but good news for everybody else on the planet.
Let’s hope the flattened and receding curve of coronavirus cases here in the United States will continue through the fall and throughout the year.
Nevertheless, advocates of perpetual government restrictions on our personal freedoms warn it is risky to ease government restrictions now because currently, warm temperatures may be masking an inevitable second wave of the virus when temperatures cool in the fall.
Ironically, these advocates tend to be the same people who recently denied that global warming may be lessening the terrible impacts of the virus.
First, they tell us warm temperatures will do us no good fighting coronavirus. Then, they tell us to expect a fall rebound when temperatures cool.
Well, which is it? Do warmer temperatures inhibit the virus, which reveals another benefit of our modest global warming, or is there no reason to fear an autumn coronavirus rebound?
Climate alarmists can’t have it both ways.
Indeed, the New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, and many other reliably leftist/climate alarmist media outlets have repeatedly and condescendingly lectured us that warmer temperatures this summer will not significantly inhibit COVID-19.
Now, however, as the coronavirus curve has flattened and states begin to reopen, these same media outlets warn us that a potential fall coronavirus rebound makes restoring people’s freedoms too reckless and too risky.
From the climate alarmist perspective, the recent decline in coronavirus cases has had nothing to do with the onset of summer.
If that is the case, the worst appears to be behind us. If coronavirus rebounds in the fall, however, climate alarmists owe the rest of us an apology and an acknowledgment that global warming is benefiting humans in the battle against this global pandemic.
Read more at Climate Realism
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-23--Michael Mann Loves Lockdown Because CO2 Emissions Dropped

Last Wednesday afternoon , MSNBC anchor Katy Tur touted the “ drop in pollution ” as a “ positive consequence of the pandemic ” that has killed hundreds of thousands of people around the world and left tens of millions unemployed .
Talking to Penn State University professor and climate activist Michael Mann , she hoped Americans would seize on this “ unique ” “ opportunity ” to “ change our habits.
” [ PSI Editor ’ s note : This fraudster still hasn ’ t paid the $ 1 million he was ordered to pay Dr Tim Ball from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ climate lawsuit in the BC Supreme Court ] Late in the 2:00 p.m .
ET hour , Tur proclaimed : SEE ALSO : No , The Coronavirus Lockdown Hasn ’ t Made The Air Cleaner However , she then warned : “ My next guest argues that that is , though , a drop in the bucket when it comes to what is needed to address climate change.
” After introducing Mann , she marveled : “ I ’ m sure everybody online saw those images of a smog-free Los Angeles almost looking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clear .
And wow , oh , my God , if we all stopped getting on the road , then this is what the air could look like… ” Mann hailed the development : “ When you slow the economy , you reduce transportation…you decrease carbon emissions .
Because right now we have a global economy that is driven by the burning of fossil fuels .
And as long as that ’ s true when you reduce economic output , you ’ re going to reduce carbon emissions.
” NewsBusters has documented the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cheered the supposed environmental “ silver lining ” of the devastating global health crisis .
Despite joining Tur in her enthusiasm , Mann cautioned that far more must be done to stop humans from ruining the Earth with economic activity : Now , here ’ s the bad news , in the end , that ’ s only going to give us maybe a 4 to 7 % decrease in carbon emissions for the year .
And what we actually need is a 10 % decrease in carbon emissions every year for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ avert crossing the threshold of dangerous influence with our climate .
So we need to cut carbon emissions far more than that .
And we ’ d like to do that without slowing down the economy .
The way to do that is to decarbonize our economy , to remake our economy so that we don ’ t have to burn fossil fuels to generate economic activity , goods , services , and transport .
Tur lamented : “ So what we ’ re seeing here was even in the months of this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the number – the percentage that we need to really cut down on climate change and it ’ s going to climb right back up once everybody is let out.
” She then implored : “ It seems like , Michael , we are in a really unique position right to effect that change , to change our habits since we ’ re all locked down.
” Mann agreed : “ Yeah , and that ’ s the good news , right ?
What this shows us is that we can have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The climate crusader then repeated his demand that “ We need to literally decarbonize our economy.
” After prompting by Tur to explain his declaration , Mann argued : “ …it literally means moving away from the burning of fossil fuels for transport and power generation and everything else , to renewable energy.
” He quickly made the transition to the 2020 election : “ We need politicians who support those policies , we ’ ve got an election coming up in a matter of months where we can choose to vote on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Tur wondered : “ Michael , just quickly , if there was one single thing that we could change tomorrow , what would it be ?
” Mann reiterated : “ It would be the leadership that we have in Washington , D.C. ” Tur appreciated his “ blunt answer.
” Wrapping up the segment , Tur turned to co-anchor Chuck Todd and concluded : “ And if we go back to our normal ways , the opportunity that we have in front of us to cut down on carbon , to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , will have gone to waste.
” Todd seized on Mann ’ s recommendation that the government force people and businesses to reduce their carbon emissions : “ He ’ s making the argument that if you ’ re going to get the innovation that you need , you almost have to force the innovation .
That ’ s why you see some governments raise mileage standards….that you have to make structural change.
” [ … ] Early in the pandemic , on March 31 , Tur dreamed of the crisis bringing “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ universal health care ” and a “ greener economy.
” She and many of her liberal media colleagues have been pushing the socialist agenda relentlessly throughout the shutdown .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Michael Mann Loves Lockdown Because CO2 Emissions Dropped
Written by Kyle Drennan
Last Wednesday afternoon, MSNBC anchor Katy Tur touted the “drop in pollution” as a “positive consequence of the pandemic” that has killed hundreds of thousands of people around the world and left tens of millions unemployed.
Talking to Penn State University professor and climate activist Michael Mann, she hoped Americans would seize on this “unique” “opportunity” to “change our habits.”
[PSI Editor’s note: This fraudster still hasn’t paid the $1 million he was ordered to pay Dr Tim Ball from last year when Ball beat his phony climate lawsuit in the BC Supreme Court]
Late in the 2:00 p.m. ET hour, Tur proclaimed:
“An unexpected yet positive consequence of the pandemic has been a drop in pollution, specifically carbon pollution, which fell 17{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} worldwide at the peak of the global stay-at-home orders. “That’s mostly the result of fewer vehicles on the road, but also fewer planes in the sky and factories being closed as well.”
SEE ALSO: No, The Coronavirus Lockdown Hasn’t Made The Air Cleaner
However, she then warned: “My next guest argues that that is, though, a drop in the bucket when it comes to what is needed to address climate change.”
watch the video here:
https://www.mrctv.org/videos/msnbcs-tur-touts-climate-positive-consequence-pandemic
After introducing Mann, she marveled: “I’m sure everybody online saw those images of a smog-free Los Angeles almost looking like a painting, it was so clear. And wow, oh, my God, if we all stopped getting on the road, then this is what the air could look like…”
Mann hailed the development: “When you slow the economy, you reduce transportation…you decrease carbon emissions. Because right now we have a global economy that is driven by the burning of fossil fuels. And as long as that’s true when you reduce economic output, you’re going to reduce carbon emissions.”
NewsBusters has documented the lengthy list of journalists that have similarly cheered the supposed environmental “silver lining” of the devastating global health crisis.
Despite joining Tur in her enthusiasm, Mann cautioned that far more must be done to stop humans from ruining the Earth with economic activity:
Now, here’s the bad news, in the end, that’s only going to give us maybe a 4 to 7{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} decrease in carbon emissions for the year. And what we actually need is a 10{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} decrease in carbon emissions every year for the next ten years if we are to avert crossing the threshold of dangerous influence with our climate. So we need to cut carbon emissions far more than that. And we’d like to do that without slowing down the economy. The way to do that is to decarbonize our economy, to remake our economy so that we don’t have to burn fossil fuels to generate economic activity, goods, services, and transport.
Tur lamented: “So what we’re seeing here was even in the months of this lockdown, we’re not getting to the number – the percentage that we need to really cut down on climate change and it’s going to climb right back up once everybody is let out.”
She then implored: “It seems like, Michael, we are in a really unique position right to effect that change, to change our habits since we’re all locked down.”
Mann agreed: “Yeah, and that’s the good news, right? What this shows us is that we can have a positive impact on our environment.”
The climate crusader then repeated his demand that “We need to literally decarbonize our economy.”
After prompting by Tur to explain his declaration, Mann argued: “…it literally means moving away from the burning of fossil fuels for transport and power generation and everything else, to renewable energy.”
He quickly made the transition to the 2020 election: “We need politicians who support those policies, we’ve got an election coming up in a matter of months where we can choose to vote on this issue and make the right decisions.”
Tur wondered: “Michael, just quickly, if there was one single thing that we could change tomorrow, what would it be?”
Mann reiterated: “It would be the leadership that we have in Washington, D.C.” Tur appreciated his “blunt answer.”
Wrapping up the segment, Tur turned to co-anchor Chuck Todd and concluded: “And if we go back to our normal ways, the opportunity that we have in front of us to cut down on carbon, to really make an impact on climate change, will have gone to waste.”
Todd seized on Mann’s recommendation that the government force people and businesses to reduce their carbon emissions: “He’s making the argument that if you’re going to get the innovation that you need, you almost have to force the innovation. That’s why you see some governments raise mileage standards….that you have to make structural change.” […]
Early in the pandemic, on March 31, Tur dreamed of the crisis bringing “permanent change” to American society with “universal health care” and a “greener economy.”
She and many of her liberal media colleagues have been pushing the socialist agenda relentlessly throughout the shutdown.
Read rest at NewsBusters
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-23--Washington State Is Classifying Shootings as COVID-19 Deaths

Washington epidemiologists have admitted that multiple victims of gunshot wounds who had also been diagnosed with coronavirus have been counted @ @ @ @ @ they say deaths from the virus are still likely being undercounted in the state .
@ @ @ @ @ Department of Health said that the “ number of nuances ” in coronavirus data makes @ @ @ @ @ quick assessment in the cause of death .
The state is currently counting anyone that @ @ @ @ @ death toll .
“ We currently do have some deaths that are being reported that @ @ @ @ @ .
We have about 5 deaths less than 5 deaths that we know of that @ @ @ @ @ causes .
In this case , they are from gunshot wounds , ” said Dr. @ @ @ @ @ Manager for the Washington State Department of Health .
The state is currently reviewing between @ @ @ @ @ to understand what role — if any — coronavirus played in the deaths , Hutchison @ @ @ @ @ will take between six and 12 months .

DISRN reported:
Washington epidemiologists have admitted that multiple victims of gunshot wounds who had also been diagnosed with coronavirus have been counted as COVID-19 deaths, although they say deaths from the virus are still likely being undercounted in the state.
Epidemiologists with the Washington State Department of Health said that the “number of nuances” in coronavirus data makes it difficult to render a quick assessment in the cause of death. The state is currently counting anyone that dies with COVID-19 in its death toll.
“We currently do have some deaths that are being reported that are clearly from other causes. We have about 5 deaths less than 5 deaths that we know of that are related to obvious other causes. In this case, they are from gunshot wounds,” said Dr. Katie Hutchison, Health Statistics Manager for the Washington State Department of Health.
The state is currently reviewing between 20 and 30 similar cases to understand what role — if any — coronavirus played in the deaths, Hutchison said, adding the process will take between six and 12 months.


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-24--Latest CDC Data is the Best Reason to End COVID-19 Lockdown

Latest CDC Data is the Best Reason to End COVID-19 Lockdown The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) nows estimates that 35 percent of coronavirus infections are asymptomatic .
But that ’ s not even the most important part of their latest estimates .
It ’ s the CDC ’ s new “ best estimate ” for the case fatality rate amongst symptomatic patients .
But , before I got to that , I should note that back in March , the World Health Organization ( WHO ) estimated a 3.4 percent fatality rate and Dr. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the coronavirus was about 2 percent .
President Trump was skeptical of both those numbers , particularly the WHO ’ s estimate : “ Well , I think the 3.4 percent is really a false number , ” Trump told Sean Hannity .
“ Now , and this is just my hunch , and — but based on a lot of conversations with a lot of people that do this .
Because a lot of people will have this and it ’ s very mild .
They ’ ll get better very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ see a doctor .
They don ’ t even call a doctor .
I think that that number is very high .
I think the number , personally , I would say the number is way under 1 percent.
” Several studies have suggested that Trump was right .
But , now here ’ s what the CDC is saying about the fatality rate the coronavirus : According to the CDC ’ s current best estimate , the case fatality rate of the coronavirus is .4 percent .
And that ’ s just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CDC estimates , is 65 percent of all cases .
This means the CDC estimates that the fatality rate for all infections across all age groups , symptomatic as well as asymptomatic , is approximately .26 percent .
The CDC does caution that the numbers are likely to change with new data , but considering we ’ ve gone from 3.4 percent to 2.0 percent to now 0.26 percent .
The more data we get , the lower the numbers get .
So , I ’ m thinking it might get even lower @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this is that the early doomsday predictions about the coronavirus were all wrong .
Everything that justified the lockdowns and the shutting down of our economy was wrong .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Latest CDC Data is the Best Reason to End COVID-19 Lockdown
Written by Matt Margolis
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) nows estimates that 35 percent of coronavirus infections are asymptomatic.
But that’s not even the most important part of their latest estimates. It’s the CDC’s new “best estimate” for the case fatality rate amongst symptomatic patients.
But, before I got to that, I should note that back in March, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated a 3.4 percent fatality rate and Dr. Anthony Fauci estimated that the fatality rate of the coronavirus was about 2 percent.
President Trump was skeptical of both those numbers, particularly the WHO’s estimate: “Well, I think the 3.4 percent is really a false number,” Trump told Sean Hannity. “Now, and this is just my hunch, and — but based on a lot of conversations with a lot of people that do this. Because a lot of people will have this and it’s very mild. They’ll get better very rapidly. They don’t even see a doctor. They don’t even call a doctor. I think that that number is very high. I think the number, personally, I would say the number is way under 1 percent.”
Several studies have suggested that Trump was right. But, now here’s what the CDC is saying about the fatality rate the coronavirus:
0-49 years old: .05{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}
50-64 years old: .2{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}
65+ years old: 1.3{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}
Overall ages: .4{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}
According to the CDC’s current best estimate, the case fatality rate of the coronavirus is .4 percent. And that’s just amongst symptomatic cases, which, the CDC estimates, is 65 percent of all cases. This means the CDC estimates that the fatality rate for all infections across all age groups, symptomatic as well as asymptomatic, is approximately .26 percent.
Justin Hart @justin_hart Quick video showing how to calculate the IFR from the CFR which the CDC gave us using actuals AND the 35{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} asymptomatic rate. I think I have this right now. 111 Twitter Ads info and privacy 57 people are talking about this
The CDC does caution that the numbers are likely to change with new data, but considering we’ve gone from 3.4 percent to 2.0 percent to now 0.26 percent. The more data we get, the lower the numbers get. So, I’m thinking it might get even lower.
But, the bigger takeaway from this is that the early doomsday predictions about the coronavirus were all wrong. Everything that justified the lockdowns and the shutting down of our economy was wrong.
Read more at pjmedia.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-24--CV-19 Autopsies Show Blood Clots: A ‘Bacterial, Not Viral Disease’

Doctors in Italy , Germany and India who autopsied patients found many COVID-19 cases are actually BACTERIAL rather than a virus .
Many cases point to thrombosis as cause of death .
Recommended treatments should include blood thinners such as simple aspirin .
In Italy doctors who broke with the World Health Organisation ( WHO ) protocols were able to effectively treat COVID-19 once they recognised many cases were nothing other than “ Disseminated intravascular coagulation ” ( Thrombosis ) .
Having discovered this diagnosis , the Italian Ministry of Health immediately changed the coronavirus treatment protocols and began to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 100mg and Apronax .
These patients began to recover and as a result of this new method , the Ministry of Health released and sent home more than 14,000 patients in a single day .
Italian doctors report success in combating COVID-19 with “ antibiotics , anti-inflammatories and anticoagulants ” .
Indeed , nothing more than ASPIRIN , is shown as very effective , indicating that this disease had been poorly treated .
Italian doctors affirmed this treatment after autopsies on deceased patients showed blood clotting as cause of death .
According to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the intensive care unit were never needed.
” Meanwhile , doctors in India affirm CV-19 is most likely a bacterial disease – it does not appear to be a virus – which explains why the WHO protocols for treating the pandemic as a virus have been ineffective .
Dr Jaideep Dogra , MD and in-charge of CGHS in Jaipur and Dr Luvdeep Dogra , DM-F Nephrology at Osmania University is reporting that in India they are having most success when treating the disease as a normal bacterial pneumonia infection .
‘ The Tribune @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) in ‘ Co-existence of coronavirus with bacterial pathogen a major cause of fatalities ’ tells us that : “ Researching ‘ Chlamydia pneumonia ’ for over two years on heart patients in Rajasthan , Dr Jaideep also published a paper in the International Journal of General Medicine .
“ Eighty-five per cent of Covid-19 patients having normal Influenza-Like Illness ( ILI ) symptoms get treated , while 10-15 per cent of patients develops sudden breathlessness and land in an emergency .
In such patients , C.penumoniae probably gets activated when COVID-19 breaks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This bacterial pathogen has a tendency , it gets activated , causes arterial thrombo ( coagulopathy ) ” , they said.
” Quoting a postmortem study on COVID-19 victims done by Italy , they found : “ Autopsy studies on 38 subjects from two hospitals in Italy who died of COVID-19 were systematically analysed .
A relevant finding of the presence of platelet-fibrin-thrombosis in small pulmonary arteries , which fits into the clinical context of a ‘ Coagulopathy ’ was present in a majority of these patients ( 86.8 % , 33 out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was the turning point in the management of COVID 19 ” .
“ Similarly , ‘ Happy hypoxia ’ of COVID-19 disease in which young patients succumb suddenly as their hypoxia goes unnoticed can be explained by the autopsy reports from young soldiers of Korean War and Vietnam War reporting an incidence of 45-77 % of Coronary atherosclerosis in the mean age group of 26 years .
This indirectly co-relates with the known observation that chlamydia pneumonia is present in young populations too ” , they hypothesized .
“ However , why only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and land in the emergency room is still an unsolved puzzle .
Moreover , while on positive pressure ventilation the condition of these patients paradoxically worsened .
While those who got simple non-invasive oxygen delivery did show recovery .
We may argue that the ventilated patients were inherently sicker but then is there something beyond that too ?
” they explained .
“ Evidence has been accumulating on the role of Chlamydia pneumoniae-a species of Gram-negative obligate intracellular pathogen ( the link between virus and bacteria ) which causes a spectrum of lower @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and has been implicated in etiology/ pathogenesis of artery blockage ” , the duo said .
A widely used anti-bacterial drug Azithromycin for COVID-19 patients is giving positive results .
Doctors assume it is controlling the virus , but this may be a wrong notion , Dogras said , adding , Azithromycin has long been used for ‘ Chlamydia pneumonia.
’ Hence , the action of this anti-bacterial drug may lie in not curing a deadly virus ( SARS CoV 2 ) but killing Chlamydia and preventing the mortality associated with the disease @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Internal Medicine ’ ( 6 May 2020 ) in ‘ Autopsy Findings and Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With COVID-19 ’ reported on autopsies performed at a single academic medical center , as mandated by the German federal state of Hamburg .
They affirmed the prevalence of thrombosis in deceased COVID-19 patients .
[ 2 ] As has been the case worldwide , the mortality rate is highest among the elderly with multiple comorbidities .
The report stated all patients autopsied had : The German study strongly recommended autopsy as a means of increasing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : [ 1 ] ‘ The Tribune India ’ ( May 24 , 2020 ) in ‘ Co-existence of coronavirus with bacterial pathogen a major cause of fatalities ’ https : //www.tribuneindia.com/news/nation/co-existence-of-coronavirus-with-bacterial-pathogen-a-major-cause-of-fatalities-88867 [ 2 ] See : ‘ Autopsy Findings and Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With COVID-19 ’ https : //doi.org/10.7326/M20-2003 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

CV-19 Autopsies Show Blood Clots: A ‘Bacterial, Not Viral Disease’
Written by John O'Sullivan
Doctors in Italy, Germany and India who autopsied patients found many COVID-19 cases are actually BACTERIAL rather than a virus. Many cases point to thrombosis as cause of death. Recommended treatments should include blood thinners such as simple aspirin.
In Italy doctors who broke with the World Health Organisation (WHO) protocols were able to effectively treat COVID-19 once they recognised many cases were nothing other than “Disseminated intravascular coagulation” (Thrombosis).
Having discovered this diagnosis, the Italian Ministry of Health immediately changed the coronavirus treatment protocols and began to administer to their CV-19 positive patients Aspirin 100mg and Apronax. These patients began to recover and as a result of this new method, the Ministry of Health released and sent home more than 14,000 patients in a single day.
Italian doctors report success in combating COVID-19 with “antibiotics, anti-inflammatories and anticoagulants”. Indeed, nothing more than ASPIRIN, is shown as very effective, indicating that this disease had been poorly treated.
Italian doctors affirmed this treatment after autopsies on deceased patients showed blood clotting as cause of death. According to Italian pathologists, “The ventilators and the intensive care unit were never needed.”
Meanwhile, doctors in India affirm CV-19 is most likely a bacterial disease – it does not appear to be a virus – which explains why the WHO protocols for treating the pandemic as a virus have been ineffective.
Dr Jaideep Dogra, MD and in-charge of CGHS in Jaipur and Dr Luvdeep Dogra, DM-F Nephrology at Osmania University is reporting that in India they are having most success when treating the disease as a normal bacterial pneumonia infection.
‘The Tribune India’ (May 24, 2020) in ‘Co-existence of coronavirus with bacterial pathogen a major cause of fatalities’ tells us that:
“This ‘Chlamydia pneumonia’ is present in several heart patients, and around 10 per cent of the general population in the dormant stage. When COVID-19 attacks a person— breaking the immunity quotient—a process of blood coagulation initiates in pulmonary arteries leading to a cardiac arrest or Hypoxia in which the patient succumbs to the dual diseases.” [1]
‘The Tribune India’ continues:
“Researching ‘Chlamydia pneumonia’ for over two years on heart patients in Rajasthan, Dr Jaideep also published a paper in the International Journal of General Medicine. “Eighty-five per cent of Covid-19 patients having normal Influenza-Like Illness (ILI) symptoms get treated, while 10-15 per cent of patients develops sudden breathlessness and land in an emergency. In such patients, C.penumoniae probably gets activated when COVID-19 breaks down the patient’s immunity. This bacterial pathogen has a tendency, it gets activated, causes arterial thrombo (coagulopathy)”, they said.”
Quoting a postmortem study on COVID-19 victims done by Italy, they found:
“Autopsy studies on 38 subjects from two hospitals in Italy who died of COVID-19 were systematically analysed. A relevant finding of the presence of platelet-fibrin-thrombosis in small pulmonary arteries, which fits into the clinical context of a ‘Coagulopathy’ was present in a majority of these patients (86.8{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}, 33 out of 38). And, this was the turning point in the management of COVID 19”. “Similarly, ‘Happy hypoxia’ of COVID-19 disease in which young patients succumb suddenly as their hypoxia goes unnoticed can be explained by the autopsy reports from young soldiers of Korean War and Vietnam War reporting an incidence of 45-77{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of Coronary atherosclerosis in the mean age group of 26 years. This indirectly co-relates with the known observation that chlamydia pneumonia is present in young populations too”, they hypothesized. “However, why only 10-15{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of patients develop sudden breathlessness and land in the emergency room is still an unsolved puzzle. Moreover, while on positive pressure ventilation the condition of these patients paradoxically worsened. While those who got simple non-invasive oxygen delivery did show recovery. We may argue that the ventilated patients were inherently sicker but then is there something beyond that too?” they explained. “Evidence has been accumulating on the role of Chlamydia pneumoniae-a species of Gram-negative obligate intracellular pathogen (the link between virus and bacteria) which causes a spectrum of lower and upper respiratory tract infection in humans and has been implicated in etiology/ pathogenesis of artery blockage”, the duo said.
A widely used anti-bacterial drug Azithromycin for COVID-19 patients is giving positive results. Doctors assume it is controlling the virus, but this may be a wrong notion, Dogras said, adding, Azithromycin has long been used for ‘Chlamydia pneumonia.’
Hence, the action of this anti-bacterial drug may lie in not curing a deadly virus (SARS CoV 2) but killing Chlamydia and preventing the mortality associated with the disease, they opined.
“If Azithromycin is administered in early stages of Corona infection in the optimum doses, the mortality risks of this dreaded disease may be minimised“, they further stressed.
‘Annals of Internal Medicine’ (6 May 2020) in ‘Autopsy Findings and Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With COVID-19’ reported on autopsies performed at a single academic medical center, as mandated by the German federal state of Hamburg. They affirmed the prevalence of thrombosis in deceased COVID-19 patients. [2]
As has been the case worldwide, the mortality rate is highest among the elderly with multiple comorbidities. The report stated all patients autopsied had:
“preexisting chronic medical conditions, such as obesity, coronary heart disease, asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral artery disease, diabetes mellitus type 2, and neurodegenerative diseases.”
They concluded:
“The high incidence of thromboembolic events suggests an important role of COVID-19–induced coagulopathy.”
The German study strongly recommended autopsy as a means of increasing understanding of the disease. They wrote:
“Despite modern diagnostic tests, autopsy is still of great importance and may be a key to understanding the biological characteristics of SARS–CoV-2 and the pathogenesis of the disease.”
[1] ‘The Tribune India’ (May 24, 2020) in ‘Co-existence of coronavirus with bacterial pathogen a major cause of fatalities’ https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/nation/co-existence-of-coronavirus-with-bacterial-pathogen-a-major-cause-of-fatalities-88867
[2]See: ‘Autopsy Findings and Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With COVID-19’ https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-2003
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-24--Watch: US Military Destroys Aircraft in-flight with New DEW Laser Weapon

Watch : US Military Destroys Aircraft in-flight with New DEW Laser Weapon Images and videos provided by the Navy show @ @ @ @ @ USS Portland executing “ the first system-level implementation of a high-energy class solid-state laser ” @ @ @ @ @ aircraft , the statement said .
The images show the laser emanating from the deck @ @ @ @ @ video clips show what appears to be the drone burning .
The Navy did not @ @ @ @ @ the laser weapons system demonstrator ( LWSD ) test , saying only that it occurred @ @ @ @ @ 16 .
The power of the weapon was not disclosed , but a 2018 report @ @ @ @ @ Strategic Studies said it was expected to be a 150-kilowatt laser .

Watch: US Military Destroys Aircraft in-flight with New DEW Laser Weapon
Written by Brad Lendon
A US Navy warship has successfully tested a new high-energy laser weapon that can destroy aircraft mid-flight, the Navy’s Pacific Fleet said in a statement Friday.
Images and videos provided by the Navy show the amphibious transport dock ship USS Portland executing “the first system-level implementation of a high-energy class solid-state laser” to disable an aerial drone aircraft, the statement said.
The images show the laser emanating from the deck of the warship. Short video clips show what appears to be the drone burning.
The Navy did not give a specific location of the laser weapons system demonstrator (LWSD) test, saying only that it occurred in the Pacific on May 16.
The power of the weapon was not disclosed, but a 2018 report from the International Institute for Strategic Studies said it was expected to be a 150-kilowatt laser.
“By conducting advanced at sea tests against UAVs and small crafts, we will gain valuable information on the capabilities of the Solid State Laser Weapons System Demonstrator against potential threats,” Capt. Karrey Sanders, commanding officer of Portland, said in the statement. “With this new advanced capability, we are redefining war at sea for the Navy.” The Navy says lasers, which it calls directed energy weapons (DEW), can be effective defenses against drones or armed small boats. “The Navy’s development of DEWs like the LWSD provide immediate warfighter benefits and provide the commander increased decision space and response options,” the statement said. In 2017, CNN witnessed a live-fire exercise of a 30-kilowatt laser weapon aboard the amphibious transport ship USS Ponce in the Persian Gulf. At the time, Lt. Cale Hughes, a laser weapons system officer, described how they work. “It is throwing massive amounts of photons at an incoming object,” Hughes said. “We don’t worry about wind, we don’t worry about range, we don’t worry about anything else. We’re able to engage the targets at the speed of light.” The Ponce was retired from service later that year. Read more at edition.cnn.com **** PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. Please DONATE TODAY Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-24--Dr. Fauci Lied About ‘Mysterious Inflammatory Condition’ in Children

It should be clear at this point that NIAID Director Dr. Tony Fauci has been completely inaccurate with his predictions and extremely dangerous .
Fauci ’ s most recent panic porn involves a rare inflammatory condition in children that is associated with respiratory infections .
This uncommon condition is not unfamiliar to doctors who treat children with respiratory infections .
But it does make good headlines for the fake news media during a pandemic .
Dr. Fauci made several mistakes during this pandemic the greatest being his lockdown plan and destruction of the US economy .
Dr. Fauci was promoting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ predicted over 2 million US deaths — a completely nonsensical number based on the realities at the time .
The Kawasaki condition he referred to is something that is a “ common ” pediatric presentation .
It shows up in 13 in a 100,000 kids in [ Canada ] in any given year .
It has been around prior to the existence of C-19 .
Dr. Fauci is using the flawed argument to keep schools closed in America .
Several European countries started sending children back to school this past month .
Dr. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he worked in the private sector he would have been fired a long time ago .
Dr. Andrew Bostom reported on this rare inflammatory condition in children earlier this month .
Senator Paul ’ s limited time for discussion precluded mention of data repeatedly demonstrating–from Australia , The Netherlands , Switzerland , and France—that children , certainly those below 10-years old , are less likely to contract covid-19 , and dramatically less prone to transmit the disease to others .
Indeed , the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases ( 4/11/20 ) described a covid-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as part of a cluster of cases in the French Alps , who did not transmit the virus to 112 contacts at schools , or a ski class .
“ However ” as the report noted , “ the high proportion of picornavirus and influenza infections among his contacts at the schools indicated transmission of those viruses within those settings.
” Although Dr. Fauci ’ s response to Sen. Paul closed with a grudging and passing concession to “ the numbers ” in children , his initial comments riveted upon what has been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ography ) .
Right now children [ are ] presenting with covid-16 ( sic ) , covid-19 , who actually have a very strange inflammatory syndrome very similar to Kawasaki ’ s Syndrome [ Disease ] .
I think we better be careful that we are not cavalier in thinking that children are completely immune to the deleterious effects .
So again , I think you ’ re right in the numbers that children , in general , do much , much better than adults and the elderly…That ’ s why I am @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Thus , even after Sen. Paul resoundingly debunked Fauci ’ s opening presentation alarmism , the NIAID Director had the temerity to raise the specter of “ Kawasaki Syndrome ” in children with covid-19 , completely de-contextualizing this uncommon , and generally transient inflammatory condition ’ s well-established association to all manner of respiratory infections —including otherwise rather benign human that cause 15-30 % of common colds !
For example , a 2016 study published in one of the pre-eminent childhood illness journals , Pediatrics , found that 42 % of 192 children @ @ @ @ @ @ @ respiratory infection , 7/192 , or 3.6 % , testing positive for one of three cold-causing human coronaviruses .
Finally , a refreshingly sober 5/9/20 perspective on the ginned up covid19-Kawasaki Disease hysteria Dr. Fauci was content to fan , based upon review of 100 purported “ cases , ” concluded the syndrome was “ rare , “ children seem to improve rapidly , ” “ and children are probably still spared from most morbidities and mortality linked to COVID-19 infection.
” Contra the prevailing hard left-dominated “ mainstream ” media caricature , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 5/14/20 interview with Maria Bartiromo ) thoughtfully , if firmly , on the matter of school re-opening , and rejected Dr. Fauci ’ s opinion : [ ~2:37-3:01 ] Young people are very little affected by this ( covid-19 ) .
We have to get the schools open…I totally disagree with him ( Fauci ) on schools .
Acknowledging the lethal havoc covid-19 had wrought upon the vulnerable elderly , “ the elderly have been decimated , ” the President added this reasonable caveat : [ ~14 ; 35-15:05 ] Open the schools @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or older , especially if they have diabetes , if they have a bad heart , if they have a ( medical ) problem , we say relax for a longer period of time .
But if you look , there ’ s been very little damage done to people that are healthy and young , and frankly medium age people .
Poisoned with their own deranged hatred of POTUS Trump , which renders them impenetrable by fact , “ mainstream ” media sneered its collective disapproval of his remarks ( examples here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dr. Fauci ’ s factually-challenged covid-19 pediatric panic stoking , reflexively amplified by the media chorus of apocalyptic covid-19 brayers , school re-openings are burgeoning across Europe ( including Denmark ; France ; The Netherlands ; Switzerland ; Greece ; Croatia ; Serbia ; and Slovenia ) , Australia—and Montana , here in the U.S… …Americans , instead , must disregard Fauci ’ s covid-19 pediatric panic porn , and demand that U.S. schools be re-opened selectively , now , and full re-opened by late summer .
Dr. Fauci is once again creating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This should be enough to get this man fired .
It it totally irresponsible .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Dr. Fauci Lied About ‘Mysterious Inflammatory Condition’ in Children
Written by Jim Hoft
It should be clear at this point that NIAID Director Dr. Tony Fauci has been completely inaccurate with his predictions and extremely dangerous.
Fauci’s most recent panic porn involves a rare inflammatory condition in children that is associated with respiratory infections.
This uncommon condition is not unfamiliar to doctors who treat children with respiratory infections. But it does make good headlines for the fake news media during a pandemic.
Dr. Fauci made several mistakes during this pandemic the greatest being his lockdown plan and destruction of the US economy. Dr. Fauci was promoting a garbage “scientific” model that predicted over 2 million US deaths — a completely nonsensical number based on the realities at the time.
The Kawasaki condition he referred to is something that is a “common” pediatric presentation. It shows up in 13 in a 100,000 kids in [Canada] in any given year. It has been around prior to the existence of C-19.
Dr. Fauci is using the flawed argument to keep schools closed in America. Several European countries started sending children back to school this past month.
Dr. Fauci has done enough damage. If he worked in the private sector he would have been fired a long time ago.
Dr. Andrew Bostom reported on this rare inflammatory condition in children earlier this month.
Via AndrewBostom.com
Senator Paul’s limited time for discussion precluded mention of data repeatedly demonstrating–from Australia, The Netherlands, Switzerland, and France—that children, certainly those below 10-years old, are less likely to contract covid-19, and dramatically less prone to transmit the disease to others. Indeed, the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases (4/11/20) described a covid-19 infected 9-year old child, contact traced as part of a cluster of cases in the French Alps, who did not transmit the virus to 112 contacts at schools, or a ski class. “However” as the report noted, “the high proportion of picornavirus and influenza infections among his contacts at the schools indicated transmission of those viruses within those settings.” Although Dr. Fauci’s response to Sen. Paul closed with a grudging and passing concession to “the numbers” in children, his initial comments riveted upon what has been aptly characterized as pediatric panic porn(ography). Right now children [are] presenting with covid-16 (sic), covid-19, who actually have a very strange inflammatory syndrome very similar to Kawasaki’s Syndrome [Disease]. I think we better be careful that we are not cavalier in thinking that children are completely immune to the deleterious effects. So again, I think you’re right in the numbers that children, in general, do much, much better than adults and the elderly…That’s why I am very reserved in making broad predictions. Thus, even after Sen. Paul resoundingly debunked Fauci’s opening presentation alarmism, the NIAID Director had the temerity to raise the specter of “Kawasaki Syndrome” in children with covid-19, completely de-contextualizing this uncommon, and generally transient inflammatory condition’s well-established association to all manner of respiratory infections each year —including otherwise rather benign human coronaviruses that cause 15-30{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of common colds! For example, a 2016 study published in one of the pre-eminent childhood illness journals, Pediatrics, found that 42{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of 192 children admitted with Kawasaki Syndrome had a detectable respiratory infection, 7/192, or 3.6{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}, testing positive for one of three cold-causing human coronaviruses. Finally, a refreshingly sober 5/9/20 perspective on the ginned up covid19-Kawasaki Disease hysteria Dr. Fauci was content to fan, based upon review of 100 purported “cases,” concluded the syndrome was “rare, “children seem to improve rapidly,” “and children are probably still spared from most morbidities and mortality linked to COVID-19 infection.” Contra the prevailing hard left-dominated “mainstream” media caricature, President Trump weighed in (during a 5/14/20 interview with Maria Bartiromo) thoughtfully, if firmly, on the matter of school re-opening, and rejected Dr. Fauci’s opinion: [~2:37-3:01] Young people are very little affected by this (covid-19). We have to get the schools open…I totally disagree with him (Fauci) on schools. Acknowledging the lethal havoc covid-19 had wrought upon the vulnerable elderly, “the elderly have been decimated,” the President added this reasonable caveat: [~14;35-15:05] Open the schools. But if a teacher is 65 or older, especially if they have diabetes, if they have a bad heart, if they have a (medical) problem, we say relax for a longer period of time. But if you look, there’s been very little damage done to people that are healthy and young, and frankly medium age people. Poisoned with their own deranged hatred of POTUS Trump, which renders them impenetrable by fact, “mainstream” media sneered its collective disapproval of his remarks (examples here; here: here). Notwithstanding Dr. Fauci’s factually-challenged covid-19 pediatric panic stoking, reflexively amplified by the media chorus of apocalyptic covid-19 brayers, school re-openings are burgeoning across Europe (including Denmark; France; The Netherlands; Switzerland; Greece; Croatia; Serbia; and Slovenia), Australia—and Montana, here in the U.S… …Americans, instead, must disregard Fauci’s covid-19 pediatric panic porn, and demand that U.S. schools be re-opened selectively, now, and full re-opened by late summer.
Read the entire report here. [1]
Dr. Fauci is once again creating panic porn to scare American parents. This should be enough to get this man fired. It it totally irresponsible.
[1] https://www.andrewbostom.org/2020/05/americans-must-disregard-faucis-covid-19-pediatric-panic-porn/
Read more at www.thegatewaypundit.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related