principiascientificinternational--2020-08-25--2010: Rockefeller’s ‘Operation Lockstep’ Predicted 2020 ‘Lockdown’

In 2010 , in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis , the Rockefeller Foundation , one of Our major “ philanthropic ” organs , convened what is called a “ scenario planning exercise ” where future events that we may or may not be planning are “ gamed ” .
Ostensibly , future and scenario planning is simply prudent , especially as regards public health , so it was not seen as any threat by the masses at large .
Nevertheless , Our corollary organs did everything possible to keep this information from them , including high levels of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ health information is concerned .
The exercise was conducted in association with a group called the Global Business Network ( GBN ) , a now-defunct group of very sophisticated and connected Silicon Valley influence peddlers described by Wikipedia as a “ global strategy firm that specialized in helping organizations [ including businesses , NGOs and governments ] to adapt and grow in an increasingly uncertain and volatile world.
” These included “ futurist ” Peter Schwartz , Stewart Brand , both former members of Students for a Democratic Society , and Jay Ogilvy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who has no Wikipedia page but whose family name is the same as one of the biggest names in advertising .
( It is unclear if there is a connection . )
All are connected to SRI International , formerly Stanford Research International , and Royal Dutch/Shell .
Stanford University ’ s science departments are well known to be connected with DARPA and US intelligence , and are creators of so-called “ artificial intelligence ” .
The “ Lock Step ” scenario is the first of four narratives presented in the Rockefeller Foundation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the Future of Technology and International Development ” .
It deals with a zoonotic viral pandemic that wipes out millions across the globe .
It ’ s not that long of a read , so let ’ s just take a quick walk through it , because it is indeed very eye-opening .
The details are worth knowing .
“ A new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly .
Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ population and killing 8 million in just seven months , the majority of them healthy young adults .
The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies : international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt , debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains .
Even locally , normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months , devoid of both employees and customers .
The pandemic blanketed the planet — though disproportionate numbers died in Africa , Southeast Asia , and Central America , where the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of official containment protocols .
But even in developed countries , containment was a challenge .
The United States ’ s initial policy of “ strongly discouraging ” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency , accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders .
However , a few countries did fare better — China in particular .
The Chinese government ’ s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens , as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery .
China ’ s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure .
During the pandemic , national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions , from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets .
Even after the pandemic faded , this more authoritarian control and oversight @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even intensified .
In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power .
At first , the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval .
Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability .
Citizens were more tolerant , and even eager , for top-down direction and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit .
In developed countries , this heightened oversight took many forms : biometric IDs for all citizens , for example , and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests .
In many developed countries , enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and , importantly , economic growth .
Across the developing world , however , the story was different — and much more variable .
Top-down authority @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hinging largely on the capacity , caliber , and intentions of their leaders .
In countries with strong and thoughtful leaders , citizens ’ overall economic status and quality of life increased .
In India , for example , air quality drastically improved after 2016 , when the government outlawed high-emitting vehicles .
In Ghana , the introduction of ambitious government programs to improve basic infrastructure and ensure the availability of clean water for all her people led to a sharp decline in water-borne diseases .
But more authoritarian leadership worked less well @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in countries run by irresponsible elites who used their increased power to pursue their own interests at the expense of their citizens .
There were other downsides , as the rise of virulent nationalism created new hazards : spectators at the 2018 World Cup , for example , wore bulletproof vests that sported a patch of their national flag .
Strong technology regulations stifled innovation , kept costs high , and curbed adoption .
In the developing world , access to “ approved ” technologies increased but beyond that remained limited : the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the developed world , leaving many developing countries on the receiving end of technologies that others consider “ best ” for them .
Some governments found this patronizing and refused to distribute computers and other technologies that they scoffed at as “ second hand.
” Meanwhile , developing countries with more resources and better capacity began to innovate internally to fill these gaps on their own .
Meanwhile , in the developed world , the presence of so many top-down rules and norms greatly inhibited entrepreneurial activity .
Scientists and innovators were often @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pursue and were guided mostly toward projects that would make money ( e.g.
, market-driven product development ) or were “ sure bets ” ( e.g.
, fundamental research ) , leaving more risky or innovative research areas largely untapped .
Well-off countries and monopolistic companies with big research and development budgets still made significant advances , but the IP behind their breakthroughs remained locked behind strict national or corporate protection .
Russia and India imposed stringent domestic standards for supervising and certifying encryption-related products and their suppliers — a category that in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ U.S. and EU struck back with retaliatory national standards , throwing a wrench in the development and diffusion of technology globally .
Especially in the developing world , acting in one ’ s national self-interest often meant seeking practical alliances that fit with those interests — whether it was gaining access to needed resources or banding together in order to achieve economic growth .
In South America and Africa , regional and sub-regional alliances became more structured .
Kenya doubled its trade with southern and eastern Africa , as new partnerships grew within @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Africa expanded as the bargain of new jobs and infrastructure in exchange for access to key minerals or food exports proved agreeable to many governments .
Cross-border ties proliferated in the form of official security aid .
While the deployment of foreign security teams was welcomed in some of the most dire failed states , one-size-fits-all solutions yielded few positive results .
By 2025 , people seemed to be growing weary of so much top-down control and letting leaders and authorities make choices for them .
Wherever national interests clashed with individual @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pushback became increasingly organized and coordinated , as disaffected youth and people who had seen their status and opportunities slip away — largely in developing countries — incited civil unrest .
In 2026 , protestors in Nigeria brought down the government , fed up with the entrenched cronyism and corruption .
Even those who liked the greater stability and predictability of this world began to grow uncomfortable and constrained by so many tight rules and by the strictness of national boundaries .
The feeling lingered that sooner or later , something would inevitably @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s governments had worked so hard to establish.
” Here are our key take-aways from the “ Lock Step ” scenario , including a comparison to the coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) event : Did the Rockefeller Foundation and Silicon Valley agents really predict the current pandemic ?
Are antisocial behavior–sensing functional MRI scanners – which would likely be carcinogenic , mandatory health screenings ( DNA collection ? )
and home imprisonment in our future ?
And is the dream of a World Wide Web of communication and consciousness doomed ?
These questions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ real or not is important .
It is not immaterial that the virus itself may be immaterial .
There are a myriad of questions to be addressed with regard to how viruses have been scientifically assumed to exist and by whom .
There is no doubt that the killer virus , the killer microbe , has ruling class strategic efficacy .
Hollywood has been telegraphing this scenario for years in movies like 2011 ’ s Contagion .
( Check out the trailer if you have a moment .
It ’ s unbelievably star-studded @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Gwenyth Paltrow , has been seen wearing a mask to a farmer ’ s market .
It is further worth noting that Trump-in-law and close Bibi Netanyahu associate Jared Kushner stand to profit from COVID testing mania .
As reported by Mint Press News , Kushner ’ s brother is “ co-founder of Oscar Health , a huge medical company that this week launched a test center locator for COVID-19 , where users input their data and are directed to one of many locations where they can receive a test.
” Oscar @ @ @ @ @ @ @ $ 16,000 Obamacare deductibles .
And Bill Gates ’ s Microsoft will be putting machines in all schools to help with tele-schooling , according to his recent must-read Reddit AMA .
Appearing to follow the Rockefeller “ narrative ” or script , US corporate media , specifically MSNBC , has called for China-like “ mitigation ” measures for this alleged COVID-19 illness , which is mild and yet responsible for so many unverified deaths , because they were declared cases before testing was available .
MSNBC host Rachel Maddow acknowledges the “ testing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for , instead making a point of focus on “ mitigation.
” She suggests avoiding crowds , not flying ( you can ’ t anyway ) and “ self-quarantining , ” questioning whether there ‘ needs to be ’ “ clear federal standards ” on self-quarantining .
New York Times science and health writer Don McNiel ups the authoritarian ante , arguing for separation from families , which he claims was necessary in China due to 75 % to 80 % of infections being “ in families ” .
McNiel also calls for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he ’ s not just talking about going to a designated health clinic .
He ’ s talking about Chinese measures such as body temperature checks : Of course the real-life Chinese measures , particularly isolation , have resulted in a rise in post-traumatic stress disorder caused by enforced isolation , loss of livelihood and what We might call “ viru-noia ” .
And since , as veteran investigative journalist Jon Rappoport has reported at nomorefakenews.com , China is well known to have a pneumonia epidemic and a sickening level of air pollution @ @ @ @ @ @ @ protested despite bans on protest in China , one must be suspicious about the number of deaths and causes of deaths in China .
Is it not inconceivable those alleged corona isolations and deaths may have included undesirable types .
What we have is Our most prodigious and unheard-of conditioning of the herd yet , to a closed , controlled society , which in the name of public health protection exercises “ medical martial law ” and performs “ syndromic surveillance , ” a term you will hear much more of because it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ • World Economic Forum issues a white paper in conjunction with Harvard Global Heath , January 18 , 2019 , “ Outbreak Readiness and Business Impact : Protecting Lives and Livelihoods across the Global Economy “ , declaring epidemic outbreaks as great a business risk as “ climate change ” ; • China ’ s new vaccine law , passed June 29 , 2019 , which mandates vaccinations for all starting on December 1 , 2019 and modernizes vaccine production ; • President Trump ’ s September 19 , 2019 Executive Order on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ States to Promote National Security and Public Health ” , which very similarly asserts the essential need for a rapid rollout of vaccines in the event of a zoonotic viral pandemic ; and • Event 201 , the much-noticed planning event coordinated by the Gates Foundation , the World Economic Forum and the Michael Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University ’ s Center for Health Security , also gamed a global “ novel zoonotic coronavirus ” pandemic “ modeled on SARS ” killing 65 million people , issuing recommendations on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such a crisis .
Although the gamed Event 201 pandemic was to occur in South America , one of the players in this event was from the Chinese Centers for Disease Control with no South American representatives in attendance .
• Microsoft founder Bill Gates ’ statements and Gates Foundation activities throughout an extended period of time , including a 2013 Netflix documentary called “ The Next Pandemic ” .
Is it not uncoincidental that Gates just “ stepped down ” from leadership of Microsoft to focus on his vaccine-focused “ philanthropic initiatives @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from Amazon , launched the Seattle Corona Assessment Network ( SCAN ) , which is sending at-home corona tests to Seattle residents .
SCAN is “ an outgrowth of the Seattle Flu Study , which has been using genetic analysis to track the spread of infectious diseases for more than a year ” , according to GeekWire .
They are now “ offering ” nasal swabs to area residents , just as the Gates organization has taken human samples elsewhere in the world .
The origins of these developments in “ syndromic surveillance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the early post-911 days , which arguably ushered in Our ill-considered coup on Western democracy .
Notably , the Rockefeller Lock Step scenario does not mention the word “ vaccination ” .
It appears a strange omission , as anti-vaccine censorship and mandatory vaccine legislation also preceded this unprecedented alleged pandemic event .
In fact , Rep. Adam Schiff of Russiagate fame has been recently sued by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons for “ bullying tech companies into censoring information about vaccines.
” Specifically , their complaint “ points to letters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Amazon in February and March of 2019 urging those companies to discredit or deplatform any content that suggests vaccines may be harmful.
” Of course Amazon , Google and other Big Tech company have begun “ disrupting healthcare ” already .
Now the people are being told vaccines will shortly provide them with the immunity they apparently lack .
This is an even greater threat , as the Moderna vaccines that may be used , as reported by the great Mint Press News , now Unlimited Hangout reporter Whitney Webb , are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them GMO vaccines .
The ruling class attack is thus genetic and species-genocidal .
Despite this omission , the Rockefeller “ Lock Step ” scenario is nonetheless a ruling class dream come true ( but epically dire for the masses ) : the end of the sovereign individual in a cradle-to-grave system of behavioral , medical , digital surveillance and control .
One wonders if the world ’ s leaders , celebrities and politicians who disproportionately seem to be afflicted with “ novel corona ” will be lining up for their biometric IDs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attributed to encryption , which is blamed for the end of the global Internet and the free flow of information – and thus technological and economic innovation – among the world ’ s peoples .
Consider this in the context of the EARN IT Act that has been heavily pushed by Attorney General Bill Barr , which calls for government backdoors ostensibly to fight online child abuse .
These “ steps ” constitute an evisceration of constitutional democracy , the sovereignty of the individual and the advent of neofeudal conditions , where the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one ’ s person .
We call this “ Chinafication.
” Investigative journalist Harry Vox , who broke this document back in 2014 , calls it “ authoritarian capitalism ” .
Vox first warned the world about the Rockefeller pandemic “ Lock Down ” scenario on October 21 , 2014 from New York City .
His prescient and timely warning is highly suggested viewing .
The invasiveness that Harry Vox so incisively speaks about is a violation of our human persons , consciousnesses and beings .
This is what makes it so unpleasant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ As they say here , the “ dragnet ” , the “ ultimate stop n frisk ” .
The ultimate power-over .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

2010: Rockefeller’s ‘Operation Lockstep’ Predicted 2020 ‘Lockdown’
Written by James Fetzer
In 2010, in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, the Rockefeller Foundation, one of Our major “philanthropic” organs, convened what is called a “scenario planning exercise” where future events that we may or may not be planning are “gamed”.
Ostensibly, future and scenario planning is simply prudent, especially as regards public health, so it was not seen as any threat by the masses at large. Nevertheless, Our corollary organs did everything possible to keep this information from them, including high levels of increasing and creeping censorship, especially where health information is concerned.
The exercise was conducted in association with a group called the Global Business Network (GBN), a now-defunct group of very sophisticated and connected Silicon Valley influence peddlers described by Wikipedia as a “global strategy firm that specialized in helping organizations [including businesses, NGOs and governments] to adapt and grow in an increasingly uncertain and volatile world.”
These included “futurist” Peter Schwartz, Stewart Brand, both former members of Students for a Democratic Society, and Jay Ogilvy, an Esalen Institute–associated Statfor board member who has no Wikipedia page but whose family name is the same as one of the biggest names in advertising. (It is unclear if there is a connection.)
All are connected to SRI International, formerly Stanford Research International, and Royal Dutch/Shell. Stanford University’s science departments are well known to be connected with DARPA and US intelligence, and are creators of so-called “artificial intelligence”.
The Narrative: “Lock Step”
Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development
The “Lock Step” scenario is the first of four narratives presented in the Rockefeller Foundation’s summary document, “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”. It deals with a zoonotic viral pandemic that wipes out millions across the globe. It’s not that long of a read, so let’s just take a quick walk through it, because it is indeed very eye-opening. The details are worth knowing.
“A new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers. The pandemic blanketed the planet — though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’s initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery. China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power. At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth. Across the developing world, however, the story was different — and much more variable. Top-down authority took different forms in different countries, hinging largely on the capacity, caliber, and intentions of their leaders. In countries with strong and thoughtful leaders, citizens’ overall economic status and quality of life increased. In India, for example, air quality drastically improved after 2016, when the government outlawed high-emitting vehicles. In Ghana, the introduction of ambitious government programs to improve basic infrastructure and ensure the availability of clean water for all her people led to a sharp decline in water-borne diseases. But more authoritarian leadership worked less well — and in some cases tragically — in countries run by irresponsible elites who used their increased power to pursue their own interests at the expense of their citizens. There were other downsides, as the rise of virulent nationalism created new hazards: spectators at the 2018 World Cup, for example, wore bulletproof vests that sported a patch of their national flag. Strong technology regulations stifled innovation, kept costs high, and curbed adoption. In the developing world, access to “approved” technologies increased but beyond that remained limited: the locus of technology innovation was largely in the developed world, leaving many developing countries on the receiving end of technologies that others consider “best” for them. Some governments found this patronizing and refused to distribute computers and other technologies that they scoffed at as “second hand.” Meanwhile, developing countries with more resources and better capacity began to innovate internally to fill these gaps on their own. Meanwhile, in the developed world, the presence of so many top-down rules and norms greatly inhibited entrepreneurial activity. Scientists and innovators were often told by governments what research lines to pursue and were guided mostly toward projects that would make money (e.g., market-driven product development) or were “sure bets” (e.g., fundamental research), leaving more risky or innovative research areas largely untapped. Well-off countries and monopolistic companies with big research and development budgets still made significant advances, but the IP behind their breakthroughs remained locked behind strict national or corporate protection. Russia and India imposed stringent domestic standards for supervising and certifying encryption-related products and their suppliers — a category that in reality meant all IT innovations. The U.S. and EU struck back with retaliatory national standards, throwing a wrench in the development and diffusion of technology globally. Especially in the developing world, acting in one’s national self-interest often meant seeking practical alliances that fit with those interests — whether it was gaining access to needed resources or banding together in order to achieve economic growth. In South America and Africa, regional and sub-regional alliances became more structured. Kenya doubled its trade with southern and eastern Africa, as new partnerships grew within the continent. China’s investment in Africa expanded as the bargain of new jobs and infrastructure in exchange for access to key minerals or food exports proved agreeable to many governments. Cross-border ties proliferated in the form of official security aid. While the deployment of foreign security teams was welcomed in some of the most dire failed states, one-size-fits-all solutions yielded few positive results. By 2025, people seemed to be growing weary of so much top-down control and letting leaders and authorities make choices for them. Wherever national interests clashed with individual interests, there was conflict. Sporadic pushback became increasingly organized and coordinated, as disaffected youth and people who had seen their status and opportunities slip away — largely in developing countries — incited civil unrest. In 2026, protestors in Nigeria brought down the government, fed up with the entrenched cronyism and corruption. Even those who liked the greater stability and predictability of this world began to grow uncomfortable and constrained by so many tight rules and by the strictness of national boundaries. The feeling lingered that sooner or later, something would inevitably upset the neat order that the world’s governments had worked so hard to establish.”
Here are our key take-aways from the “Lock Step” scenario, including a comparison to the coronavirus (COVID-19) event:
Did the Rockefeller Foundation and Silicon Valley agents really predict the current pandemic? Are antisocial behavior–sensing functional MRI scanners – which would likely be carcinogenic, mandatory health screenings (DNA collection?) and home imprisonment in our future? And is the dream of a World Wide Web of communication and consciousness doomed?
These questions are why determining whether the virus is real or not is important. It is not immaterial that the virus itself may be immaterial. There are a myriad of questions to be addressed with regard to how viruses have been scientifically assumed to exist and by whom. There is no doubt that the killer virus, the killer microbe, has ruling class strategic efficacy. Hollywood has been telegraphing this scenario for years in movies like 2011’s Contagion. (Check out the trailer if you have a moment. It’s unbelievably star-studded.) The movie’s star, Gwenyth Paltrow, has been seen wearing a mask to a farmer’s market.
It is further worth noting that Trump-in-law and close Bibi Netanyahu associate Jared Kushner stand to profit from COVID testing mania. As reported by Mint Press News, Kushner’s brother is “co-founder of Oscar Health, a huge medical company that this week launched a test center locator for COVID-19, where users input their data and are directed to one of many locations where they can receive a test.” Oscar Health has been criticized for selling nearly $16,000 Obamacare deductibles. And Bill Gates’s Microsoft will be putting machines in all schools to help with tele-schooling, according to his recent must-read Reddit AMA.
Mainstream Media Follows The Script
Appearing to follow the Rockefeller “narrative” or script, US corporate media, specifically MSNBC, has called for China-like “mitigation” measures for this alleged COVID-19 illness, which is mild and yet responsible for so many unverified deaths, because they were declared cases before testing was available. MSNBC host Rachel Maddow acknowledges the “testing fiasco,” which she then apologizes for, instead making a point of focus on “mitigation.” She suggests avoiding crowds, not flying (you can’t anyway) and “self-quarantining,” questioning whether there ‘needs to be’ “clear federal standards” on self-quarantining.
New York Times science and health writer Don McNiel ups the authoritarian ante, arguing for separation from families, which he claims was necessary in China due to 75% to 80% of infections being “in families”. McNiel also calls for “testing testing testing testing.” But he’s not just talking about going to a designated health clinic. He’s talking about Chinese measures such as body temperature checks:
“If you go into any building, your temperature is taken. I came into this building. Nobody took my temperature. They asked me some silly questions I could have lied about. [McNiel appears to have a senior moment as he tries to remember his script.] Your, your fever taken. You get into a bus, your temperature is taken. You walk into the train station, your temperature is taken. You walk into a building, you walk back to your apartment building, your temperature is taken.” [Note the repetition.]
Of course the real-life Chinese measures, particularly isolation, have resulted in a rise in post-traumatic stress disorder caused by enforced isolation, loss of livelihood and what We might call “viru-noia”. And since, as veteran investigative journalist Jon Rappoport has reported at nomorefakenews.com, China is well known to have a pneumonia epidemic and a sickening level of air pollution, about which its Wuhan residents have protested despite bans on protest in China, one must be suspicious about the number of deaths and causes of deaths in China. Is it not inconceivable those alleged corona isolations and deaths may have included undesirable types.
What we have is Our most prodigious and unheard-of conditioning of the herd yet, to a closed, controlled society, which in the name of public health protection exercises “medical martial law” and performs “syndromic surveillance,” a term you will hear much more of because it is a nearly-20-year official CDC program.
Preparing for Pandemic
World Economic Forum issues a white paper in conjunction with Harvard Global Heath, January 18, 2019, “Outbreak Readiness and Business Impact: Protecting Lives and Livelihoods across the Global Economy“, declaring epidemic outbreaks as great a business risk as “climate change”;
China’s new vaccine law, passed June 29, 2019, which mandates vaccinations for all starting on December 1, 2019 and modernizes vaccine production;
President Trump’s September 19, 2019 Executive Order on “Modernizing Influenza Vaccines in the United States to Promote National Security and Public Health”, which very similarly asserts the essential need for a rapid rollout of vaccines in the event of a zoonotic viral pandemic; and
Event 201, the much-noticed planning event coordinated by the Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum and the Michael Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University’s Center for Health Security, also gamed a global “novel zoonotic coronavirus” pandemic “modeled on SARS” killing 65 million people, issuing recommendations on how corporations could “help” in such a crisis. Although the gamed Event 201 pandemic was to occur in South America, one of the players in this event was from the Chinese Centers for Disease Control with no South American representatives in attendance.
Microsoft founder Bill Gates’ statements and Gates Foundation activities throughout an extended period of time, including a 2013 Netflix documentary called “The Next Pandemic”. Is it not uncoincidental that Gates just “stepped down” from leadership of Microsoft to focus on his vaccine-focused “philanthropic initiatives”. Gates, together with help from Amazon, launched the Seattle Corona Assessment Network (SCAN), which is sending at-home corona tests to Seattle residents. SCAN is “an outgrowth of the Seattle Flu Study, which has been using genetic analysis to track the spread of infectious diseases for more than a year”, according to GeekWire. They are now “offering” nasal swabs to area residents, just as the Gates organization has taken human samples elsewhere in the world.
The origins of these developments in “syndromic surveillance” goes much further back, to the early post-911 days, which arguably ushered in Our ill-considered coup on Western democracy.
Notably, the Rockefeller Lock Step scenario does not mention the word “vaccination”. It appears a strange omission, as anti-vaccine censorship and mandatory vaccine legislation also preceded this unprecedented alleged pandemic event. In fact, Rep. Adam Schiff of Russiagate fame has been recently sued by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons for “bullying tech companies into censoring information about vaccines.” Specifically, their complaint “points to letters Schiff sent to Google, Facebook, and Amazon in February and March of 2019 urging those companies to discredit or deplatform any content that suggests vaccines may be harmful.” Of course Amazon, Google and other Big Tech company have begun “disrupting healthcare” already.
Now the people are being told vaccines will shortly provide them with the immunity they apparently lack. This is an even greater threat, as the Moderna vaccines that may be used, as reported by the great Mint Press News, now Unlimited Hangout reporter Whitney Webb, are DNA tamperers. We like to call them GMO vaccines. The ruling class attack is thus genetic and species-genocidal.
Despite this omission, the Rockefeller “Lock Step” scenario is nonetheless a ruling class dream come true (but epically dire for the masses): the end of the sovereign individual in a cradle-to-grave system of behavioral, medical, digital surveillance and control. One wonders if the world’s leaders, celebrities and politicians who disproportionately seem to be afflicted with “novel corona” will be lining up for their biometric IDs. Also notable is the threat level attributed to encryption, which is blamed for the end of the global Internet and the free flow of information – and thus technological and economic innovation – among the world’s peoples. Consider this in the context of the EARN IT Act that has been heavily pushed by Attorney General Bill Barr, which calls for government backdoors ostensibly to fight online child abuse.
These “steps” constitute an evisceration of constitutional democracy, the sovereignty of the individual and the advent of neofeudal conditions, where the corporate state is lord and master over one’s person. We call this “Chinafication.” Investigative journalist Harry Vox, who broke this document back in 2014, calls it “authoritarian capitalism”.
Vox first warned the world about the Rockefeller pandemic “Lock Down” scenario on October 21, 2014 from New York City. His prescient and timely warning is highly suggested viewing.
The invasiveness that Harry Vox so incisively speaks about is a violation of our human persons, consciousnesses and beings. This is what makes it so unpleasant: it is rapist in character. As they say here, the “dragnet”, the “ultimate stop n frisk”. The ultimate power-over.
Read more at jamesfetzer.org
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-27--‘The Great Reset’ – Purposing Climate Change & COVID19 Evils

The world has recently been swept up by waves of propaganda promoting the idea that a “ Great Reset ” of the world system is in order to prepare society for a new “ post-COVID ’ world order .
When one reviews the nature of those reforms on the World Economic Forum ’ s websites , or from the words of the former Governor of the Bank of Canada Mark Carney ( who has recently returned to Canada to run the post-COVID reset team alongside fellow technocrat Chrystia Freeland ) , it becomes crystal clear that this Great Reset is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ name .
Just as the Green New Deal has been the effect of decades of tireless propaganda designed to convince credulous people that it is a good idea to deconstruct industrial civilization by eliminating all activities which either increase carbon dioxide into the atmosphere or disrupt supposedly pristine states of nature ( which ivory tower mathematicians suppose exists in stasis ) , the Great Reset agenda is driven by very similar objectives and assumptions .
When compared with reality , the WHO/Gates-funded narrative justifying the total shutdown of global economies falls apart like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the Swiss Propaganda Research Institute ’ s Facts of COVID-19 .
Yet in spite of all of the evidence , it is worth asking : How have so many seemingly educated people become persuaded that COVID-19 or climate change are so existentially dangerous that we must shut down the world economy to somehow save ourselves from their apocalyptic effects ?
The answer is to be found in the sleight of hand which occurred gradually over the 20th century which replaced actual scientific thinking for something called “ predictive computer modelling ” .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Over Actual Thinking The age of “ predictive doomsday models ” in many ways grew out of the 1972 Limits to Growth study funded by the Club of Rome which popularized the technique of tying temperature increases to carbon dioxide and projecting economic variables like population , resource losses , and “ pollution growth ” into the future in order to scare the hell out of their incredulous victims and intimidate nations to drastically modify their collective behavior .
This use of skewed , under-defined statistics , projected into the future in order @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” became a hegemonic practice for the next 40 years and has been used by neo-Malthusians consistently to justify the increased rates of war , poverty and disease across the world .
Paul Ehrlich ’ s influential 1968 book the Population Bomb used similar models to cast trends of geometric population growth into the future which would result in a global crisis of unimaginable proportions as oil would dry up , arable lands dry away and resources disappear by the year 2000 .
In 1968 his book , Ehrlich stated his misanthropic view @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells ; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people… We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer .
The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions.
” Ehrlich ’ s protégé John Holdren , who led in the shutdown of NASA s science Czar went further when he wrote on p.942 in his 1977 book Ecoscience : Under this heartless logic , nation states simply had to be converted into tools for imposing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ end colonialism , poverty and war as foolish statesmen like John Kennedy , Bobby Kennedy , Enrico Mattei or Martin Luther King attempted .
Kissinger ’ s National Security Study Memorandum 200 ( 1974 ) outlined this new objective for America stating : “ Assistance for population moderation should give emphasis to the largest and fastest growing developing countries where there is a special US and strategic interest ” .
Among those developing nations targetted for population reduction , NSSM-200 listed birth control and the withholding of food as primary tools .
Kissinger @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prepared to accept food rationing to help people who can ’ t/won ’ t control their population growth ?
” Throughout the 1970s , the Trilateral Commission/Council on Foreign Relations cabal under the direction of Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski completely took over American foreign policy and launched a new economic program which Trilateral Commission member Paul Volcker called “ the controlled disintegration of the economy ” .
Upon attaining chairmanship of the Federal Reserve in 1979 , Volcker put this policy to work by raising interest rates to 20 % and kept them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s small and medium agro industries while leaving only a highly cartelized corporate behemoth capable of surviving such draconian rates .
Real growth plummeted , long term planning was forgotten and deregulation ushered in vast speculation which replaced the formerly dirigistic capitalism that made the west great .
All investments into scientific and technological progress were shut down .
Fusion energy research was systematically destroyed as fast as the space program .
Infrastructure investments dried up and America ’ s age of nuclear power construction was shut down .
In true Pygmalion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ scientifically justify ” their misanthropic view of global governance by first breaking humanity ’ s kneecaps and then arguing that we were never meant to run .
In today ’ s language , this practice of ‘ predictive modelling ’ is reflected in the central banking high priest Mark Carney ’ s calls for a new financial system to promote a decarbonized society by 2050 since ‘ predictive models ’ state that the world will heat 1.5 degrees according to a presumed connection to carbon dioxide emissions which can only be corrected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ profit on shutting down human industrial activity .
As it turns out , when compared to the real data , not only does one quickly find that the post 1977 warming trend ended in 1999 , but the actual temperature falls well below all computer projections produced by the IPCC ( which is to environmental policy what the WHO is to health policy ) .
This hysterical prediction is also seen in Prince Charles ’ recent warning that the world has 18 months to save itself before ‘ predictive modelling ’ says that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ burns in a dystopic inferno !
Charles is the son of the same Prince Philip who infamously gushed over his wish to be reincarnated as a deadly virus “ in order to solve overpopulation ” making it more than a bit ironic that Charles announced his contraction of COVID-19 on March 25 .
In a 1988 interview with Deutsche Press Agentur , Prince Philip said : “ The more people there are , the more resources they ’ ll consume , the more pollution they ’ ll create , the more fighting they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
If it isn ’ t controlled voluntarily , it will be controlled involuntarily by an increase in disease , starvation and war .
…In the event that I am reincarnated , I would like to return as a deadly virus , in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.
” One should not make the mistake of separating Philip ’ s misanthropic statements with his active role in co-founding the global ecology movement alongside Bilderberg group founder Prince Bernhardt of the Netherlands .
This includes their joint role as co-founders of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ founding of the 1001 Nature Trust in 1970 or their joint management and funding of global climate science throughout the 20th century .
As I outlined in my 2019 lecture , it was this organization that was caught red handed organizing the murder and coverup of John F. Kennedy .
Prince Bernhard and Philip ’ s powerful lackey Maurice Strong ( who served as WWF vice-president under Philip from 1976-78 ) , let the cat out of the bag in a 1990 interview saying : This is exactly what Carney and his fellow @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they speak of “ Green New Deals “ .
The Failure of the Collective Green Suicide Pact After five decades of tireless panic and propaganda , the oligarchy has had to conclude that this whole plan hasn ’ t really worked out too well .
Many nations were more than a little reticent to shut down the basis of their existence just because some Malthusian technocrats said their computer models required it to be so .
Many inquiring minds noticed that those same computer models never proved in the first place that carbon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ noticed that in longer waves of history , carbon dioxide actually follows temperature changes… implying that the true causes of climate change has less to do with CO2 and more to do with astrophysical effects like the sun and cosmic radiation ( which recent studies by Professor Svensmark have proved seeds clouds and plays a much more direct role in shaping climate change than statisticians wish to admit ) .
Others were bothered by the fact that linear computer projections fail to take into account such non-linear processes as human creative reason and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leap beyond our “ limits to growth ” through the discovery of new principles in the universe and the application of those discoveries to the economy in the form of constant leaps in scientific and technological progress .
Try as they might , linear models can not map non-linearity ( except in the form of logarithms that seek chaotic randomness in the form of a Jackson Pollack painting ) , but not real creative DIRECTED progress .
What made this “ Controlled disintegration agenda ” additionally frustrating was the rise of China ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what REAL nation states can accomplish when they want to get rid of pollution , raise their populations out of poverty and “ go green ” at the same time [ 1 ] .
In total opposition to the doomsday ‘ predictive models ’ , China has lifted 800 million people out of poverty by forcing the monetary system to obey human needs rather than conforming to the statistical models used by the World Bank or IMF .
China , Russia and other nations working within the BRI Framework have transformed the definition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by investing massively into carbon free energy like 3rd and 4th generation nuclear power , fusion research , hydroelectricity and greening deserts .
On this last point , NASA recently announced a surprising 10 % increase of global biomass due entirely to China and India ’ s development strategies which not only bring water into deserts , but also produce carbon dioxide which plants and trees actually treat as… FOOD !
Then Trump got elected and the Malthusian de-carbonization goals collapsed even further as an America long held under the control of a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so doing , revived both a lost sense of nationalism while also rejecting green suicide under a technocratic global dictatorship .
So something new had to happen .
Luckily , computer modelling doomsday scenarios are not hard to come by for British intelligence assets working through London ’ s Imperial College and Bank of England who settled on a new strategy… if only a virus could be blown into global pandemic proportions through a systemic skewing of data and centralized control of data management through the Michael Bloomberg School of Public Policy at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ perhaps nations will finally learn how to shut down their economies .
After COVID-19 was announced as a global pandemic by the World Health Organization , the COVID-19 Response Team at London ’ s Imperial College wasted no time in using the same predictive modelling techniques that failed so miserably on climate catastrophe projections to begin forecasting end times scenarios for the coronavirus outbreak .
March 17 models projected over 500 000 UK deaths and 2.2 million American deaths over the coming months .
These numbers were quickly taken up by the WHO @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the study ’ s “ remedy ” of a full “ shut down of major aspects of society for over a year.
” Despite the fact that these models were adjusted to predict only 20 000 UK deaths and 100 000 US deaths a week later , the calls to keep the world economy shut down for 12-18 months continued by Dr. Fauci , Gates , Soros and leading experts from the WHO , some of whom were caught on camera advocating breaking into homes to separate family members who have COVID .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ isn ’ t only a famous billionaire corporatist who paid $ 500 million to get his ass kicked on public television , but is also Mark Carney ’ s green bosom buddy who acted as United Nations Special Envoy for Climate Change from 2018-2019 until Carney took over the position .
Bloomberg also chairs Carney ’ s Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures which is a keystone piece of the new green cathedral of anti-growth economics which will punish all “ climate offending ” companies by cutting them from credit while rewarding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accelerate human population collapse .
Bloomberg ’ s School of Public Health just so happened to co-sponsor the October 19 , 2019 Global Pandemic Exercise Event 201 alongside the Bill Gates & Melinda Gates Foundation , and World Economic Forum which ran computer simulations under the theme of a novel coronavirus pandemic killing 60 million people .
Over the years while taking over economic , foreign policy and environmental policies of formerly industrial advanced nations of the western alliance , the neo-Malthusian movement also took over medical research through a gradual co-opting of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ private foundations which have increasingly replaced the role of nation over the past 4 decades .
Today the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has become the primary financier of the WTO ( taking the top spot with Trump ’ s recent announcement of America ’ s exit from it ’ s supporting role ) .
With their interests so intertwined with Big Pharma , and the Five Eyes intelligence agencies , medical practice and medical policy has been put firmly under the control of an elite cadre of “ scientific experts ” who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ivory towers “ untouched by politics ” beholden only to the cold hard numbers of ‘ predictive models ’ .
Both Gates and Bloomberg are among the top five world billionaires who run “ The Giving Pledge ” – which is a foundation made up of “ good ” plutocrats who pledged to donate half their wealth to charities .
What are billions after all , when you know the system you parasitically exploited is designed to collapse ?
As Carney stated last year , those “ that anticipate these developments will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adapt will cease to exist.
” Those industrial interests whom Carney threatened in his speech include those “ dirty ” ( see “ productive ” ) agro-industrial interests who are generally unhappy about the idea of being sacrificed on the alter of Gaia and would rather join China ’ s multi-trillion dollar Belt and Road Initiative , as the crisis continues to move closer to the inevitable collapse of the $ 1.2 quadrillion bubble economy .
As this future collapse point accelerates towards the present , the oligarchy knows that nations enmeshed in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gladly jump into the Multipolar Alliance as an alternative to their total destruction if for no other reason .
The Multi-Polar Alliance Re-asserts the Hegemony of the Human Mind over Computer Modelling The beauty of the new Multipolar Alliance guided by the associated Belt and Road Initiative Framework is this new system ’ s reliance upon the non-linearity of human creative thought .
By defining future states of humanity not as a crisis caused by human cancer cells killing Gaia , the new system approaches the future from the standpoint of creative change @ @ @ @ @ @ @ asteroid defense , lunar mining , fusion and fission development and large scale infrastructure the Multipolar Alliance is bringing mankind back into harmony with the demands for boundless scientific and technological progress within creation .
Speaking to the CPC central committee in 2016 , President Xi said : In an earlier speech , Xi developed this concept even further : In a 2019 speech calling for Russia ’ s prioritization of fusion power as a replacement to the fossil fuel economy , President Putin expressed similar insights saying : So when Putin or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ economic order to replace the currently collapsing one , this is the spirit of the system he is talking about .
They are talking about a system that rejects ‘ predictive modelling ’ using linear equations in favor of the REALITY of human creative mentation as a non-linear YET intelligible geological force of change bringing humanity into ever greater harmony with the laws of creation .
About the author : Matthew Ehret is the Editor-in-Chief of the Canadian Patriot Review , a BRI Expert on Tactical talk , and has authored 3 volumes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ book series .
In 2019 he co-founded the Montreal-based Rising Tide Foundation and can be reached at matt.ehret @ tutamail.com PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

‘The Great Reset’ – Purposing Climate Change & COVID19 Evils
Written by Matthew Ehret
The world has recently been swept up by waves of propaganda promoting the idea that a “Great Reset” of the world system is in order to prepare society for a new “post-COVID’ world order.
When one reviews the nature of those reforms on the World Economic Forum’s websites, or from the words of the former Governor of the Bank of Canada Mark Carney (who has recently returned to Canada to run the post-COVID reset team alongside fellow technocrat Chrystia Freeland), it becomes crystal clear that this Great Reset is just the Green New Deal under another name.
Just as the Green New Deal has been the effect of decades of tireless propaganda designed to convince credulous people that it is a good idea to deconstruct industrial civilization by eliminating all activities which either increase carbon dioxide into the atmosphere or disrupt supposedly pristine states of nature (which ivory tower mathematicians suppose exists in stasis), the Great Reset agenda is driven by very similar objectives and assumptions.
When compared with reality, the WHO/Gates-funded narrative justifying the total shutdown of global economies falls apart like a house of cards as outlined perfectly by the Swiss Propaganda Research Institute’s Facts of COVID-19.
Yet in spite of all of the evidence, it is worth asking: How have so many seemingly educated people become persuaded that COVID-19 or climate change are so existentially dangerous that we must shut down the world economy to somehow save ourselves from their apocalyptic effects?
The answer is to be found in the sleight of hand which occurred gradually over the 20th century which replaced actual scientific thinking for something called “predictive computer modelling”.
The Global Coup: Predictive Models Take Over Actual Thinking
The age of “predictive doomsday models” in many ways grew out of the 1972 Limits to Growth study funded by the Club of Rome which popularized the technique of tying temperature increases to carbon dioxide and projecting economic variables like population, resource losses, and “pollution growth” into the future in order to scare the hell out of their incredulous victims and intimidate nations to drastically modify their collective behavior.
This use of skewed, under-defined statistics, projected into the future in order to “act preventatively on future crises” became a hegemonic practice for the next 40 years and has been used by neo-Malthusians consistently to justify the increased rates of war, poverty and disease across the world.
Paul Ehrlich’s influential 1968 book the Population Bomb used similar models to cast trends of geometric population growth into the future which would result in a global crisis of unimaginable proportions as oil would dry up, arable lands dry away and resources disappear by the year 2000.
In 1968 his book, Ehrlich stated his misanthropic view in the following words:
“A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people… We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions.”
Obama and his science czar John Holdren (UNITED STATES SCI TECH SOCIETY) – RTXPEZ2
Ehrlich’s protégé John Holdren, who led in the shutdown of NASA s manned space systems and fusion program as Obama s science Czar went further when he wrote on p.942 in his 1977 book Ecoscience:
“Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime- sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market. The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”
Under this heartless logic, nation states simply had to be converted into tools for imposing depopulation programs rather than naively endeavoring to end colonialism, poverty and war as foolish statesmen like John Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy, Enrico Mattei or Martin Luther King attempted.
Kissinger’s National Security Study Memorandum 200 (1974) outlined this new objective for America stating: “Assistance for population moderation should give emphasis to the largest and fastest growing developing countries where there is a special US and strategic interest”. Among those developing nations targetted for population reduction, NSSM-200 listed birth control and the withholding of food as primary tools. Kissinger coldly wrote: “is the US prepared to accept food rationing to help people who can’t/won’t control their population growth?”
Throughout the 1970s, the Trilateral Commission/Council on Foreign Relations cabal under the direction of Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski completely took over American foreign policy and launched a new economic program which Trilateral Commission member Paul Volcker called “the controlled disintegration of the economy”.
Upon attaining chairmanship of the Federal Reserve in 1979, Volcker put this policy to work by raising interest rates to 20% and kept them there for another two years- destroying America’s small and medium agro industries while leaving only a highly cartelized corporate behemoth capable of surviving such draconian rates. Real growth plummeted, long term planning was forgotten and deregulation ushered in vast speculation which replaced the formerly dirigistic capitalism that made the west great.
All investments into scientific and technological progress were shut down. Fusion energy research was systematically destroyed as fast as the space program. Infrastructure investments dried up and America’s age of nuclear power construction was shut down.
In true Pygmalion fashion, the oligarchy was able to “scientifically justify” their misanthropic view of global governance by first breaking humanity’s kneecaps and then arguing that we were never meant to run.
In today’s language, this practice of ‘predictive modelling’ is reflected in the central banking high priest Mark Carney’s calls for a new financial system to promote a decarbonized society by 2050 since ‘predictive models’ state that the world will heat 1.5 degrees according to a presumed connection to carbon dioxide emissions which can only be corrected if we monetize carbon and put a profit on shutting down human industrial activity.
As it turns out, when compared to the real data, not only does one quickly find that the post 1977 warming trend ended in 1999, but the actual temperature falls well below all computer projections produced by the IPCC (which is to environmental policy what the WHO is to health policy).
This hysterical prediction is also seen in Prince Charles’ recent warning that the world has 18 months to save itself before ‘predictive modelling’ says that global warming becomes unstoppable and the earth burns in a dystopic inferno!
Charles is the son of the same Prince Philip who infamously gushed over his wish to be reincarnated as a deadly virus “in order to solve overpopulation” making it more than a bit ironic that Charles announced his contraction of COVID-19 on March 25. In a 1988 interview with Deutsche Press Agentur, Prince Philip said:
“The more people there are, the more resources they’ll consume, the more pollution they’ll create, the more fighting they will do. We have no option. If it isn’t controlled voluntarily, it will be controlled involuntarily by an increase in disease, starvation and war. …In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.”
One should not make the mistake of separating Philip’s misanthropic statements with his active role in co-founding the global ecology movement alongside Bilderberg group founder Prince Bernhardt of the Netherlands. This includes their joint role as co-founders of the World Wildlife Club in 1961, their founding of the 1001 Nature Trust in 1970 or their joint management and funding of global climate science throughout the 20th century.
As I outlined in my 2019 lecture, it was this organization that was caught red handed organizing the murder and coverup of John F. Kennedy.
Prince Bernhard and Philip’s powerful lackey Maurice Strong (who served as WWF vice-president under Philip from 1976-78), let the cat out of the bag in a 1990 interview saying:
“What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? The group’s conclusion is ‘no’. The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” [1]
This is exactly what Carney and his fellow central banking ideologues are talking about when they speak of “Green New Deals“.
The Failure of the Collective Green Suicide Pact
After five decades of tireless panic and propaganda, the oligarchy has had to conclude that this whole plan hasn’t really worked out too well. Many nations were more than a little reticent to shut down the basis of their existence just because some Malthusian technocrats said their computer models required it to be so.
Many inquiring minds noticed that those same computer models never proved in the first place that carbon dioxide actually causes temperature changes and others noticed that in longer waves of history, carbon dioxide actually follows temperature changes… implying that the true causes of climate change has less to do with CO2 and more to do with astrophysical effects like the sun and cosmic radiation (which recent studies by Professor Svensmark have proved seeds clouds and plays a much more direct role in shaping climate change than statisticians wish to admit).
Others were bothered by the fact that linear computer projections fail to take into account such non-linear processes as human creative reason and morality which allows mankind the freedom to leap beyond our “limits to growth” through the discovery of new principles in the universe and the application of those discoveries to the economy in the form of constant leaps in scientific and technological progress.
Try as they might, linear models cannot map non-linearity (except in the form of logarithms that seek chaotic randomness in the form of a Jackson Pollack painting), but not real creative DIRECTED progress.
What made this “Controlled disintegration agenda” additionally frustrating was the rise of China’s Belt and Road Initiative which demonstrated what REAL nation states can accomplish when they want to get rid of pollution, raise their populations out of poverty and “go green” at the same time [1].
In total opposition to the doomsday ‘predictive models’, China has lifted 800 million people out of poverty by forcing the monetary system to obey human needs rather than conforming to the statistical models used by the World Bank or IMF. China, Russia and other nations working within the BRI Framework have transformed the definition of “green” in recent years by investing massively into carbon free energy like 3rd and 4th generation nuclear power, fusion research, hydroelectricity and greening deserts.
On this last point, NASA recently announced a surprising 10% increase of global biomass due entirely to China and India’s development strategies which not only bring water into deserts, but also produce carbon dioxide which plants and trees actually treat as… FOOD!
Then Trump got elected and the Malthusian de-carbonization goals collapsed even further as an America long held under the control of a deep state changed its character and in so doing, revived both a lost sense of nationalism while also rejecting green suicide under a technocratic global dictatorship.
So something new had to happen.
New Lipstick. Same Pig.
Luckily, computer modelling doomsday scenarios are not hard to come by for British intelligence assets working through London’s Imperial College and Bank of England who settled on a new strategy… if only a virus could be blown into global pandemic proportions through a systemic skewing of data and centralized control of data management through the Michael Bloomberg School of Public Policy at Johns Hopkin and World Health Organization… then perhaps nations will finally learn how to shut down their economies.
After COVID-19 was announced as a global pandemic by the World Health Organization, the COVID-19 Response Team at London’s Imperial College wasted no time in using the same predictive modelling techniques that failed so miserably on climate catastrophe projections to begin forecasting end times scenarios for the coronavirus outbreak.
March 17 models projected over 500 000 UK deaths and 2.2 million American deaths over the coming months. These numbers were quickly taken up by the WHO and spread across international media to justify the study’s “remedy” of a full “shut down of major aspects of society for over a year.”
Despite the fact that these models were adjusted to predict only 20 000 UK deaths and 100 000 US deaths a week later, the calls to keep the world economy shut down for 12-18 months continued by Dr. Fauci, Gates, Soros and leading experts from the WHO, some of whom were caught on camera advocating breaking into homes to separate family members who have COVID.
For those paying attention, Michael Bloomberg isn’t only a famous billionaire corporatist who paid $500 million to get his ass kicked on public television, but is also Mark Carney’s green bosom buddy who acted as United Nations Special Envoy for Climate Change from 2018-2019 until Carney took over the position.
Bloomberg also chairs Carney’s Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures which is a keystone piece of the new green cathedral of anti-growth economics which will punish all “climate offending” companies by cutting them from credit while rewarding “green zero carbon” companies which accelerate human population collapse.
Bloomberg’s School of Public Health just so happened to co-sponsor the October 19, 2019 Global Pandemic Exercise Event 201 alongside the Bill Gates & Melinda Gates Foundation, and World Economic Forum which ran computer simulations under the theme of a novel coronavirus pandemic killing 60 million people.
Over the years while taking over economic, foreign policy and environmental policies of formerly industrial advanced nations of the western alliance, the neo-Malthusian movement also took over medical research through a gradual co-opting of funding of the World Health Organization by private foundations which have increasingly replaced the role of nation over the past 4 decades.
Today the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has become the primary financier of the WTO (taking the top spot with Trump’s recent announcement of America’s exit from it’s supporting role). With their interests so intertwined with Big Pharma, and the Five Eyes intelligence agencies, medical practice and medical policy has been put firmly under the control of an elite cadre of “scientific experts” who play god with the human race in ivory towers “untouched by politics” beholden only to the cold hard numbers of ‘predictive models’.
Both Gates and Bloomberg are among the top five world billionaires who run “The Giving Pledge”– which is a foundation made up of “good” plutocrats who pledged to donate half their wealth to charities. What are billions after all, when you know the system you parasitically exploited is designed to collapse? As Carney stated last year, those “that anticipate these developments will be rewarded handsomely; those that fail to adapt will cease to exist.”
Those industrial interests whom Carney threatened in his speech include those “dirty” (see “productive”) agro-industrial interests who are generally unhappy about the idea of being sacrificed on the alter of Gaia and would rather join China’s multi-trillion dollar Belt and Road Initiative, as the crisis continues to move closer to the inevitable collapse of the $1.2 quadrillion bubble economy.
As this future collapse point accelerates towards the present, the oligarchy knows that nations enmeshed in the west’s monetarist net will gladly jump into the Multipolar Alliance as an alternative to their total destruction if for no other reason.
The Multi-Polar Alliance Re-asserts the Hegemony of the Human Mind over Computer Modelling
The beauty of the new Multipolar Alliance guided by the associated Belt and Road Initiative Framework is this new system’s reliance upon the non-linearity of human creative thought. By defining future states of humanity not as a crisis caused by human cancer cells killing Gaia, the new system approaches the future from the standpoint of creative change.
By investing in space exploration, asteroid defense, lunar mining, fusion and fission development and large scale infrastructure the Multipolar Alliance is bringing mankind back into harmony with the demands for boundless scientific and technological progress within creation.
Speaking to the CPC central committee in 2016, President Xi said:
“Coordinated development is the unity of balanced development and imbalanced development. The process from balance to imbalance and then to rebalance is the basic law of development. Balance is relative while imbalance is absolute. Emphasizing coordinated development is not pursuing equalitarianism, but giving more importance to equal opportunities and balanced resource allocation.”
In an earlier speech, Xi developed this concept even further:
“We must consider innovation as the primary driving force of growth and the core in this whole undertaking, and human resources as the primary source to support development. We should promote innovation in theory, systems, science and technology, and culture, and make innovation the dominant theme in the work of the Party, and government, and everyday activity in society… In the 16th century, human society entered an unprecedented period of active innovation. Achievements in scientific innovation over the past five centuries have exceeded the sum total of several previous millennia. . . . Each and every scientific and industrial revolution has profoundly changed the outlook and pattern of world development. . . . Since the second Industrial Revolution, the U.S. has maintained global hegemony because it has always been the leader and the largest beneficiary of scientific and industrial progress.”
In a 2019 speech calling for Russia’s prioritization of fusion power as a replacement to the fossil fuel economy, President Putin expressed similar insights saying:
“It may seem strange at first, but fusion energy, which in fact is similar to how heat and light are produced in our star, in the Sun, is an example of such nature-like technologies. “Potentially we can harness a colossal, inexhaustible and safe source of energy. However, we will only succeed in fusion energy and in solving other fundamental tasks if we establish broad international cooperation and interaction between government and business, and join the efforts of researchers representing different scientific schools and areas. If technological development becomes truly global, it will not be split up or reined in by attempts to monopolize progress, limit access to education and put up new obstacles to the free exchange of knowledge and ideas.. With their help, scientists will be able to literally see nature’s creation processes.”
So when Putin or Xi come out calling for a new economic order to replace the currently collapsing one, this is the spirit of the system he is talking about. They are talking about a system that rejects ‘predictive modelling’ using linear equations in favor of the REALITY of human creative mentation as a non-linear YET intelligible geological force of change bringing humanity into ever greater harmony with the laws of creation.
About the author: Matthew Ehret is the Editor-in-Chief of the Canadian Patriot Review , a BRI Expert on Tactical talk, and has authored 3 volumes of ‘Untold History of Canada’ book series. In 2019 he co-founded the Montreal-based Rising Tide Foundation and can be reached at [email protected]
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-27--The Racism Of Climate Change Alarmists

The Racism Of Climate Change Alarmists

Climate alarmists now proclaim that climate change is racist .
What hypocrisy .
By this theory , the sun , our galaxy , and their creator are racist , since they have driven climate change throughout history .
Racism has certainly been a factor in many decisions about land use , zoning , education , and many other aspects of our lives .
But this began long before Europeans “ discovered ” America .
Tribalism , the most fundamental form of racism historically , has been around at least since the dawn of the Iron Age .
The new racism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and a direct outgrowth of centuries of patronizing colonialism .
Many still believe today ’ s poor and indigenous people must be “ guided ” into a “ green ” tomorrow and not allowed to use the tools that Western and other countries employed to grow , create wealth , improve living standards , and remain free .
Many even seem OK that their “ solutions ” to “ climate change ” yield highly negative results for billions of people worldwide whose lifestyles are far removed from the privileges of eco-elites – who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of electricity , 24/7/365 or even at all .
Instead of recognizing their own role in sustaining energy poverty ( and its resultant misery , disease , and death ) , the alarmists berate the West for escaping generational poverty through technology .
Penn State meteorologist Gregory Jenkins ( who works for Dr. Michael Mann , co-creator of dangerous Mann-made climate change ) has linked racism to climate change “ because it dictates who benefits from activities that produce planet-warming gases and who suffer most from the consequences.
” But their “ solutions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ families access to fossil fuel “ activities ” – and blessings – while burdening their own societies with heavy taxes and mandates that would curtail affordable energy and living standards for billions .
Fifteen years ago , Cameroonian journalist Jean-Claude Shanda Tomme said environmentalists “ still believe us to be like children that they must save as if we don ’ t realize ourselves what the source of our problems is.
” Incredibly , this remains a prevailing attitude .
Nearly two decades ago , in his seminal book Eco-Imperialism : Green Power @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the eco-colonialism ( and racism ) of European and American nongovernmental organizations , banking institutions , and governments .
In its introduction , Congress Of Racial Equality national spokesman Niger Innis said the green elites ’ policies “ prevent needy nations from using the very technologies that developed countries employed to become rich , comfortable and free of disease .
And they send millions of infants , children , men , and women to early graves every year.
” They insist that Africans not be allowed to combat malaria with DDT , which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Nor may Africans rely on their abundant oil , coal , natural gas , nuclear or hydroelectric resources , the same technologies , and resources that built Western and Eastern societies .
Multiple voices have demanded that the West stop smothering Africans with money that fuels massive corruption .
A decade ago , in reviewing Dambisa Moyo ’ s brilliant 2009 book , Dead Aid , I recalled her litany of “ sins of aid with strings.
” It fuels corruption , encourages inflation , increases debt loads , kills exports , causes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disenfranchises citizens .
In effect , foreign aid is also racist .
My colleagues and I pointed out that $ 500 billion in foreign aid had done little to improve the lives of ordinary Africans , who still had few highways , no real electric grid , little sanitation or clean water , few hospitals , and millions dying annually from diseases almost entirely wiped out elsewhere in the world .
At that time , OPEC Secretary-General Mohammed Barkindo pleaded with Western leaders that “ energy is fundamental for economic development and social @ @ @ @ @ @ @ forms of energy is welcome , it is clear that fossil fuels will continue to satisfy the lion ’ s share of the world ’ s growing energy needs for decades to come.
” But Africans are still routinely denied financing to develop those resources for their own citizens .
This is racism at its worst .
I also reviewed a World Bank Development Research Group proposal for building a 100,000-kilometer African highway system to connect all major African capitals and large cities .
It would cost just $ 30 billion , plus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but could generate $ 750 billion a year in overland trade among African nations .
But it quickly hit the environmentalist/development bank dustbin .
Pure racism .
The racism even extended to higher education , as European and American universities recruited Africa ’ s brightest and best African students and faculty , leaving their own fledgling institutions of higher learning in shambles .
Lydia Polgreen said this academic flight “ depriv [ ed ] dozens of nations of the homegrown expertise that could lift millions out of poverty.
” More racism .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Chamber Executive Chairman N.J. Ayuk recently criticized the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development ( OECD ) and International Energy Agency ( IEA ) for describing low oil prices caused by the COVID-19 pandemic as a “ golden opportunity ” for governments to phase out fossil fuels support– and thus better living standards .
He put it bluntly : “ The OECD and IEA don ’ t necessarily know what ’ s best for the people who live on this planet .
Pressuring governments to stop supporting fossil fuels certainly would not be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ companies or entrepreneurs striving to build a better future .
And it could be downright harmful to communities looking at gas-to-power initiatives to bring them reliable electricity.
” “ Too often , ” Ayuk added , “ the discussion about climate change – and the call to leave fossil fuels in the ground – is largely a Western narrative .
It does not factor in the needs of low-income Africans who could reap the many benefits of a strategic approach to oil and gas operations in Africa : Reduced energy poverty , job @ @ @ @ @ @ @ name a few.
” On the global stage , he concluded , the OECD and the IEA are “ dismissing the voices of many Africans who want and need the continent ’ s oil and gas industry to thrive.
” African energy entrepreneurs and Africans who care about energy poverty are struggling .
But their voices are ignored by these power brokers and the world .
Journalist Geoff Hill highlighted how many Africans still rely on increasingly scarce firewood to cook and heat their homes on cold nights , despite the environmental damage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Of the world ’ s 50 countries with the least access to electricity , 41 are in Africa – despite abundant rivers , sunlight , and oil , gas , coal , and uranium reserves .
The chief reason , Hill explained , is corruption – traced back to the foreign aid Dambisa Moyo criticized .
Climate alarmists naturally say it ’ s someone else ’ s fault .
Thankfully , finally , says Hill , some Africans are admitting their own role in allowing corrupt cultures to rule them .
Nigerian @ @ @ @ @ @ @ book Rescue Thyself details the failure of African governments to serve their people .
He is saddened that , despite over a trillion dollars in aid to Africa from the U.S. alone , so much has been blown on palaces , private jets , and outright theft .
But who empowered these greedy leaders , who sought to do what donors wanted ?
Will the West finally recognize that it was their paternalistic racism that empowered this corruption ?
Will it change its ways ?
Or will it just continue the eugenic practices @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to reproduce ?
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

The Racism Of Climate Change Alarmists
Written by Duggan Flanakin
Climate alarmists now proclaim that climate change is racist. What hypocrisy. By this theory, the sun, our galaxy, and their creator are racist, since they have driven climate change throughout history.
Racism has certainly been a factor in many decisions about land use, zoning, education, and many other aspects of our lives.
But this began long before Europeans “discovered” America. Tribalism, the most fundamental form of racism historically, has been around at least since the dawn of the Iron Age.
The new racism is a prime domain of environmental alarmists and a direct outgrowth of centuries of patronizing colonialism.
Many still believe today’s poor and indigenous people must be “guided” into a “green” tomorrow and not allowed to use the tools that Western and other countries employed to grow, create wealth, improve living standards, and remain free.
Many even seem OK that their “solutions” to “climate change” yield highly negative results for billions of people worldwide whose lifestyles are far removed from the privileges of eco-elites – who don’t even enjoy the blessings of electricity, 24/7/365 or even at all.
Instead of recognizing their own role in sustaining energy poverty (and its resultant misery, disease, and death), the alarmists berate the West for escaping generational poverty through technology.
Penn State meteorologist Gregory Jenkins (who works for Dr. Michael Mann, co-creator of dangerous Mann-made climate change) has linked racism to climate change “because it dictates who benefits from activities that produce planet-warming gases and who suffer most from the consequences.”
But their “solutions” always deny African and other poor families access to fossil fuel “activities” – and blessings – while burdening their own societies with heavy taxes and mandates that would curtail affordable energy and living standards for billions.
Fifteen years ago, Cameroonian journalist Jean-Claude Shanda Tomme said environmentalists “still believe us to be like children that they must save as if we don’t realize ourselves what the source of our problems is.” Incredibly, this remains a prevailing attitude.
Nearly two decades ago, in his seminal book Eco-Imperialism: Green Power, Black Death, Paul Driessen exposed the eco-colonialism (and racism) of European and American nongovernmental organizations, banking institutions, and governments.
In its introduction, Congress Of Racial Equality national spokesman Niger Innis said the green elites’ policies “prevent needy nations from using the very technologies that developed countries employed to become rich, comfortable and free of disease. And they send millions of infants, children, men, and women to early graves every year.”
They insist that Africans not be allowed to combat malaria with DDT, which eradicated malaria throughout the developed world. Nor may Africans rely on their abundant oil, coal, natural gas, nuclear or hydroelectric resources, the same technologies, and resources that built Western and Eastern societies.
Multiple voices have demanded that the West stop smothering Africans with money that fuels massive corruption. A decade ago, in reviewing Dambisa Moyo’s brilliant 2009 book, Dead Aid, I recalled her litany of “sins of aid with strings.”
It fuels corruption, encourages inflation, increases debt loads, kills exports, causes civil unrest, frustrates entrepreneurship, and disenfranchises citizens. In effect, foreign aid is also racist.
My colleagues and I pointed out that $500 billion in foreign aid had done little to improve the lives of ordinary Africans, who still had few highways, no real electric grid, little sanitation or clean water, few hospitals, and millions dying annually from diseases almost entirely wiped out elsewhere in the world.
At that time, OPEC Secretary-General Mohammed Barkindo pleaded with Western leaders that “energy is fundamental for economic development and social progress.
While the use of all forms of energy is welcome, it is clear that fossil fuels will continue to satisfy the lion’s share of the world’s growing energy needs for decades to come.” But Africans are still routinely denied financing to develop those resources for their own citizens. This is racism at its worst.
I also reviewed a World Bank Development Research Group proposal for building a 100,000-kilometer African highway system to connect all major African capitals and large cities.
It would cost just $30 billion, plus $2 billion a year in maintenance, but could generate $750 billion a year in overland trade among African nations. But it quickly hit the environmentalist/development bank dustbin. Pure racism.
The racism even extended to higher education, as European and American universities recruited Africa’s brightest and best African students and faculty, leaving their own fledgling institutions of higher learning in shambles.
Lydia Polgreen said this academic flight “depriv[ed] dozens of nations of the homegrown expertise that could lift millions out of poverty.” More racism.
And so it continues. African Energy Chamber Executive Chairman N.J. Ayuk recently criticized the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and International Energy Agency (IEA) for describing low oil prices caused by the COVID-19 pandemic as a “golden opportunity” for governments to phase out fossil fuels support– and thus better living standards.
He put it bluntly: “The OECD and IEA don’t necessarily know what’s best for the people who live on this planet. Pressuring governments to stop supporting fossil fuels certainly would not be good for the African oil and gas companies or entrepreneurs striving to build a better future. And it could be downright harmful to communities looking at gas-to-power initiatives to bring them reliable electricity.”
“Too often,” Ayuk added, “the discussion about climate change – and the call to leave fossil fuels in the ground – is largely a Western narrative. It does not factor in the needs of low-income Africans who could reap the many benefits of a strategic approach to oil and gas operations in Africa: Reduced energy poverty, job creation, and entrepreneurship opportunities, to name a few.”
On the global stage, he concluded, the OECD and the IEA are “dismissing the voices of many Africans who want and need the continent’s oil and gas industry to thrive.”
African energy entrepreneurs and Africans who care about energy poverty are struggling. But their voices are ignored by these power brokers and the world.
Journalist Geoff Hill highlighted how many Africans still rely on increasingly scarce firewood to cook and heat their homes on cold nights, despite the environmental damage caused by stripping forest habitats to oblivion.
Of the world’s 50 countries with the least access to electricity, 41 are in Africa – despite abundant rivers, sunlight, and oil, gas, coal, and uranium reserves.
The chief reason, Hill explained, is corruption – traced back to the foreign aid Dambisa Moyo criticized. Climate alarmists naturally say it’s someone else’s fault. Thankfully, finally, says Hill, some Africans are admitting their own role in allowing corrupt cultures to rule them.
Nigerian neurosurgeon Dr. Sylvanus Ayeni’s 2017 book Rescue Thyself details the failure of African governments to serve their people.
He is saddened that, despite over a trillion dollars in aid to Africa from the U.S. alone, so much has been blown on palaces, private jets, and outright theft.
But who empowered these greedy leaders, who sought to do what donors wanted? Will the West finally recognize that it was their paternalistic racism that empowered this corruption? Will it change its ways? Or will it just continue the eugenic practices that dehumanized Africans as “unfit” to reproduce?
Read more at Townhall
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related