principiascientificinternational--2020-08-26--US Senators: FDA Causing ‘Confusion, Inaction on HCQ Treatment’

US senators wrote that the FDA ’ s actions on HCQ have “ led to misinformation and confusion across the country .
Some states have restricted the ability of physicians to write and pharmacies to fill HCQ and CQ prescriptions.
” On August 18 , 2020 , Senator Ron Johnson ( R-Wis. ) , Sen. Ted Cruz ( R-Texas ) , and Sen. Mike Lee ( R-Utah ) submitted a letter to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) Commissioner Stephen Hahn , demanding information regarding their actions taken on the use of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has done a fine job of creating confusion , as Corey ’ s Digs has been documenting their actions on HCQ since the beginning of this “ pandemic.
” This also comes on the heels of the historical 24-hour censoring takedown of America ’ s Frontline Doctors , who have been fighting to get critical information out on the benefits of HCQ .
The senators point out that “ the licensed physicians we have heard from… have pointed to the low mortality rates in other countries—like India , Turkey , South Korea , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outpatient COVID-19 populations before the disease progresses to more lethal stages of the virus that require hospitalization.
” They have given the FDA a deadline of 5:00 p.m. on August 25 , 2020 to submit information on the following requests : • Please provide any studies and data that informed the FDA ’ s apparent determination that giving HCQ or CQ to COVID-19 infected outpatients within seven days from the onset of symptoms , under a doctor ’ s supervision , will have no clinical effect and may be harmful to the patient @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , medical papers and data involving COVID-19 outpatients that have started HCQ or CQ under a doctor ’ s supervision and begun in the ambulatory care outpatient setting .
This includes post-exposure outpatient treatment and/or pre-exposure prophylaxis .
This should not include late stage studies involving patients started on HCQ while in hospital .
• Please provide and public statements or records that FDA has issued to clarify that the FDA does not regulate the practice of medicine and that state governments may not regulate the sale or prohibit the sale of prescription @ @ @ @ @ @ @ treatments for COVID-19 that have been utilized internationally , whether those treatments are authorized or approved by the FDA , and what steps the FDA has taken to ensure that these treatments are available in the U.S .
The answers to these requests can already be found in Corey ’ s Digs reports on COVID-19 .
The fact of the matter is that they do not have any studies to prove that HCQ has no clinical effect or may be harmful to a patient when used in the early stages of onset of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those who were already hospitalized .
However , there have been studies to show HCQ does in fact work in early stages .
In addition to this , the coronavirus “ task force , ” the WHO , and all major media outlets persistently reported on studies that were later retracted as bogus studies .
Furthermore , the only time Stephen Hahn spoke out about doctors being able to prescribe HCQ , after May 29 , was in a very short statement he made on NBC ’ s “ Today ” show on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to a “ false/positive ” statement at best .
At no point has the FDA clarified this correctly on their website , twitter feed , to the CDC , in documents to medical boards , or by getting the information out on multiple news stations .
Nor has the FDA requested that twitter remove their malicious “ live news on coronavirus ” alerts as though it is new information , when in fact it dates back to June , creating far more confusion .
The very next day , on August 19 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ announced a “ rescission of guidances and other informal issuances concerning premarket review of laboratory developed tests.
” Essentially , this removes the FDA from regulating and potentially slowing down lab-developed tests , which some have argued that the FDA does not have this authority to begin with .
HHS stated that “ the Trump Administration is committed to combating COVID-19 , to ensuring that the American people are protected against future pandemics , and to keep duplicative regulations and unnecessary policies from interfering in these efforts.
” Whereas this is specific to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ FDA losing ground on several fronts .
On August 21 , the Texas Medical Board issued a press release on their ongoing COVID-19 response .
In it , they addressed misinformation regarding the Board ’ s previous statement on COVID-19 treatments .
“ The Texas Medical Board has never prohibited the use of hydroxychloroquine alone , or in conjunction with other drugs , for the treatment of COVID-19 .
In fact , the TMB does not prohibit any drug or treatment .
The off-label use of hydroxychloroquine as an alternative therapy for COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the case with any alternative therapy , physicians must ensure they comply with Board Rule 200 which requires physicians to provide full disclosure of treatment options , side effects , and obtain informed consent .
Licensees should not fear disciplinary action from the TMB simply for expressing their support of specific COVID-19 treatments like hydroxychloroquine .
What providers should keep in mind is because there is no definitive cure , claims of a cure may constitute false , misleading or deceptive advertising , which is prohibited by law and may prompt an inquiry @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , four days after the senators submitted this request to the FDA , President Trump tweeted that “ the deep state , or whoever , over at the FDA is making it very difficult for drug companies to get people in order to test the vaccines and therapeutics .
Obviously , they are hoping to delay the answer until after November 3rd .
Must focus on speed , and saving lives !
” He made it a point to tag FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn in this tweet .
While all of this was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reports emerged that the FDA is putting a hold on convalescent plasma to treat COVID-19 after NIAID Director Dr. Anthony Fauci and two other federal health officials argued that there is not enough data to show that it is working .
On Sunday afternoon , President Trump , HHS Secretary Alex Azar , and FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn announced in a press conference that the FDA is issuing an emergency use authorization ( EUA ) for blood plasma as a coronavirus treatment , stating that scientists have concluded that it is safe , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ increase in survival of COVID-19 patients , which they deem to be very successful .
They will continue to gather data moving forward , as they do with all EUA ’ s .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

US Senators: FDA Causing ‘Confusion, Inaction on HCQ Treatment’
Written by Corey Lynn
US senators wrote that the FDA’s actions on HCQ have “led to misinformation and confusion across the country. Some states have restricted the ability of physicians to write and pharmacies to fill HCQ and CQ prescriptions.”
On August 18, 2020, Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), and Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) submitted a letter to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Stephen Hahn, demanding information regarding their actions taken on the use of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19.
“Physicians are concerned that the FDA’s actions regarding hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) may be directly costing lives by limiting outpatient access to this potentially beneficial treatment,” the letter stated.
The senators are correct in that the FDA has done a fine job of creating confusion, as Corey’s Digs has been documenting their actions on HCQ since the beginning of this “pandemic.” This also comes on the heels of the historical 24-hour censoring takedown of America’s Frontline Doctors, who have been fighting to get critical information out on the benefits of HCQ.
The senators point out that “the licensed physicians we have heard from… have pointed to the low mortality rates in other countries—like India, Turkey, South Korea, and Morocco—that are using HCQ widely on outpatient COVID-19 populations before the disease progresses to more lethal stages of the virus that require hospitalization.”
They have given the FDA a deadline of 5:00 p.m. on August 25, 2020 to submit information on the following requests:
Please provide any studies and data that informed the FDA’s apparent determination that giving HCQ or CQ to COVID-19 infected outpatients within seven days from the onset of symptoms, under a doctor’s supervision, will have no clinical effect and may be harmful to the patient.
Please provide any scientific studies, medical papers and data involving COVID-19 outpatients that have started HCQ or CQ under a doctor’s supervision and begun in the ambulatory care outpatient setting. This includes post-exposure outpatient treatment and/or pre-exposure prophylaxis. This should not include late stage studies involving patients started on HCQ while in hospital.
Please provide and public statements or records that FDA has issued to clarify that the FDA does not regulate the practice of medicine and that state governments may not regulate the sale or prohibit the sale of prescription drugs.
Please provide any potential treatments for COVID-19 that have been utilized internationally, whether those treatments are authorized or approved by the FDA, and what steps the FDA has taken to ensure that these treatments are available in the U.S.
The answers to these requests can already be found in Corey’s Digs reports on COVID-19. The fact of the matter is that they do not have any studies to prove that HCQ has no clinical effect or may be harmful to a patient when used in the early stages of onset of symptoms because they only promoted studies on those who were already hospitalized. However, there have been studies to show HCQ does in fact work in early stages.
In addition to this, the coronavirus “task force,” the WHO, and all major media outlets persistently reported on studies that were later retracted as bogus studies. Furthermore, the only time Stephen Hahn spoke out about doctors being able to prescribe HCQ, after May 29, was in a very short statement he made on NBC’s “Today” show on July 30, which could be equated to a “false/positive” statement at best.
At no point has the FDA clarified this correctly on their website, twitter feed, to the CDC, in documents to medical boards, or by getting the information out on multiple news stations. Nor has the FDA requested that twitter remove their malicious “live news on coronavirus” alerts as though it is new information, when in fact it dates back to June, creating far more confusion.
The very next day, on August 19, Health and Human Services (HHS) announced a “rescission of guidances and other informal issuances concerning premarket review of laboratory developed tests.” Essentially, this removes the FDA from regulating and potentially slowing down lab-developed tests, which some have argued that the FDA does not have this authority to begin with. HHS stated that “the Trump Administration is committed to combating COVID-19, to ensuring that the American people are protected against future pandemics, and to keep duplicative regulations and unnecessary policies from interfering in these efforts.” Whereas this is specific to tests, it is indicative of the FDA losing ground on several fronts.
On August 21, the Texas Medical Board issued a press release on their ongoing COVID-19 response. In it, they addressed misinformation regarding the Board’s previous statement on COVID-19 treatments.
“The Texas Medical Board has never prohibited the use of hydroxychloroquine alone, or in conjunction with other drugs, for the treatment of COVID-19. In fact, the TMB does not prohibit any drug or treatment. The off-label use of hydroxychloroquine as an alternative therapy for COVID-19 patients is completely permissible.
As is the case with any alternative therapy, physicians must ensure they comply with Board Rule 200 which requires physicians to provide full disclosure of treatment options, side effects, and obtain informed consent. Licensees should not fear disciplinary action from the TMB simply for expressing their support of specific COVID-19 treatments like hydroxychloroquine.
What providers should keep in mind is because there is no definitive cure, claims of a cure may constitute false, misleading or deceptive advertising, which is prohibited by law and may prompt an inquiry from the TMB.”
On August 22, four days after the senators submitted this request to the FDA, President Trump tweeted that “the deep state, or whoever, over at the FDA is making it very difficult for drug companies to get people in order to test the vaccines and therapeutics. Obviously, they are hoping to delay the answer until after November 3rd. Must focus on speed, and saving lives!” He made it a point to tag FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn in this tweet.
While all of this was taking place over the past week, reports emerged that the FDA is putting a hold on convalescent plasma to treat COVID-19 after NIAID Director Dr. Anthony Fauci and two other federal health officials argued that there is not enough data to show that it is working.
On Sunday afternoon, President Trump, HHS Secretary Alex Azar, and FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn announced in a press conference that the FDA is issuing an emergency use authorization (EUA) for blood plasma as a coronavirus treatment, stating that scientists have concluded that it is safe, and there has been a 35% increase in survival of COVID-19 patients, which they deem to be very successful. They will continue to gather data moving forward, as they do with all EUA’s.
Read more at www.coreysdigs.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-26--Top Yale Epidemiologist: ‘Deaths of Hundreds of Thousands of Americans’ Preventable with HCQ

Dr. Harvey Risch , a noted Yale epidemiologist , went on with Mark Levin on Sunday night on Life , Liberty and Levin .
This was a must-see segment !
Dr. Risch is an outspoken proponent of hydroxychloroquine treatment for COVID-19 .
According to Dr. Steven Hatfill at Real Clear Politics , and as we have reported here at The Gateway Pundit numerous times , there are dozens of global studies that show hydroxychloroquine is an effective treatment for COVID-19 .
** 53 global studies that show positive results with HCQ on COVID-19 ** 14 global studies that show neutral @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ** 10 of those 14 negative studies were of patients in very late stages of the disease ** 2 of those 14 negative studies were by the same doctor in Minnesota ** 1 of the studies used by Dr. Fauci from a Brazilian outlet was debunked ** The last study be Lancet was later found fraudulent and retracted Dr. Risch did not hold back tonight .
According to Dr. Risch — Dr. Fauci is now responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths and must be stopped !
Dr .
Risch described how Dr. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to die by not certifying an effective drug for treatment back in the 1980s .
Dr. Risch now argues the Dr. Fauci is doing the same thing with the coronavirus !
Dr. Risch : This has gone on before .
Now we have Dr. Fauci denying that any evidence exists of benefit ( of HCQ ) .
And that ’ s pervaded the FDA .
The FDA has relied on Dr. Fauci and his NIH advisory groups to make the statements saying that there is no benefit in using hydroxychloroquine in outpatients .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the case .
The evidence is overwhelming… Dr. Fauci and the FDA are doing the same thing that was done in 1987 and that ’ s led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans that could have been saved by the usage of this drug !
And this is the same thing that the FDA has done .
It ’ s outrageous !
People need to be writing or calling their congressman or senators and complaining that this is not the way the country should work !

Written by Jim Hoft
Dr. Harvey Risch, a noted Yale epidemiologist, went on with Mark Levin on Sunday night on Life, Liberty and Levin. This was a must-see segment! Dr. Risch is an outspoken proponent of hydroxychloroquine treatment for COVID-19.
According to Dr. Steven Hatfill at Real Clear Politics, and as we have reported here at The Gateway Pundit numerous times, there are dozens of global studies that show hydroxychloroquine is an effective treatment for COVID-19.
** 53 global studies that show positive results with HCQ on COVID-19
** 14 global studies that show neutral or negative results with HCQ on COVID-19
** 10 of those 14 negative studies were of patients in very late stages of the disease
** 2 of those 14 negative studies were by the same doctor in Minnesota
** 1 of the studies used by Dr. Fauci from a Brazilian outlet was debunked
** The last study be Lancet was later found fraudulent and retracted
Dr. Risch did not hold back tonight. According to Dr. Risch — Dr. Fauci is now responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths and must be stopped!Dr. Risch described how Dr. Fauci allowed at least 17,000 AIDS victims to die by not certifying an effective drug for treatment back in the 1980s.
Dr. Risch now argues the Dr. Fauci is doing the same thing with the coronavirus!
Dr. Risch: This has gone on before. Now we have Dr. Fauci denying that any evidence exists of benefit (of HCQ). And that’s pervaded the FDA. The FDA has relied on Dr. Fauci and his NIH advisory groups to make the statements saying that there is no benefit in using hydroxychloroquine in outpatients. And this is counter to the facts of the case. The evidence is overwhelming… Dr. Fauci and the FDA are doing the same thing that was done in 1987 and that’s led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans that could have been saved by the usage of this drug! And this is the same thing that the FDA has done. It’s outrageous! People need to be writing or calling their congressman or senators and complaining that this is not the way the country should work!
Via Life Liberty and Levin:


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-26--Watch: Front Line COVID Doctor Humiliates Fake News TV Presenter

I don ’ t know what to say about this mainstream Spanish news item , I ’ m kinda speechless @ @ @ @ @ expert Spanish doctor reveals the reality around the truly massive media madness going on at @ @ @ @ @ the actual reality , and the interviewer is thrown into confusion… !
Then a studio @ @ @ @ @ sort him out – but our doc is solid as a rock – and leaves @ @ @ @ @ UNREAL .
( subtitled ) PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as @ @ @ @ @ purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please @ @ @ @ @ Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Watch: Front Line COVID Doctor Humiliates Fake News TV Presenter
Written by Ivor Cummins
I don’t know what to say about this mainstream Spanish news item, I’m kinda speechless. This front-line, clearly expert Spanish doctor reveals the reality around the truly massive media madness going on at the moment.
He explains the actual reality, and the interviewer is thrown into confusion…! Then a studio journalist is brought in to sort him out – but our doc is solid as a rock – and leaves the henchman for dead! UNREAL. (subtitled)
Watch this incredible live tv interview below:
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-26--Nearly 400 Adverse Reactions Listed in Vaccine Package Inserts

Package inserts are available online for all vaccines licensed in the U.S .
In addition to containing bits of practical information for the clinicians who administer the vaccines , theinserts provide members of the public with one of their only opportunities to learn about a vaccine ’ s contraindications , warnings , precautions and—perhaps most importantly—potential adverse reactions .
The inserts communicate the information about adverse reactions in two distinct sections : “ Clinical trials experience ” ( Section 6.1 ) and “ Data from postmarketing experience ” from the U.S. or other countries ( Section 6.2 ) .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Health Defense summarized the postmarketing data for over three dozen vaccines given routinely to American infants , children and adolescents .
That tally showed that vaccines touted for the prevention of 13 illnesses ( Table 1 ) have been linked to at least 217 adverse medical outcomes reported post-licensure , including serious infections , autoimmune conditions , life-threatening allergies and death .
As noted in April , the postmarketing list is far from exhaustive , because manufacturers have the latitude to decide which outcomes to list in the inserts—using loose criteria determined by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ strength of evidence for a causal relationship.
” In addition , vaccine adverse events are notoriously underreported , not least because medical schools do not teach doctors to recognize vaccine injuries .
But what would the picture look like if the adverse reactions observed during clinical trials were also added to the list ?
THIS COMBINATION OF CLINICAL TRIAL AND POSTMARKETING DATA PRESENTS A DRAMATIC PICTURE , WITH ALMOST DOUBLE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNDESIRABLE POST-VACCINATION OUTCOMES … Children ’ s Health Defense can now answer that question .
The revised chart ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reported in the clinical trial sections of 41 vaccine brands covering diphtheria , Haemophilus influenzae type b , hepatitis A , hepatitis B , human papillomavirus , influenza , meningococcal infection , pertussis , pneumococcal infection , polio , rotavirus , tetanus and varicella .
This combination of clinical trial and postmarketing data presents a dramatic picture , with almost double the total number of undesirable post-vaccination outcomes—397 different types of reactions reported pre- and post-licensure .
Although roughly 400 adverse events is a sobering number , again , it is probably an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trials follow participants for an absurdly short period of time—three days here , seven days there—and do not capture problems that arise beyond that brief window , even though clinicians recognize ( and the scientific literature confirms ) that vaccine reactions are not always immediate or acute .
Moreover , even for those few days of monitoring , the inserts are often short on details , citing only a smattering of adverse events collected from a predetermined list of “ solicited ” reactions and only sometimes accepting “ unsolicited ” feedback .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trials typically compare vaccine against vaccine rather than vaccine against inert placebo makes it easy to divert attention from specific adverse reactions by simply citing “ similar rates ” of adverse reactions in both groups .
… AND THAT VACCINES CAN CAUSE THE VERY ILLNESSES—OR ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF THOSE ILLNESSES—THAT THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO PREVENT .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission @ @ @ @ @ @

Nearly 400 Adverse Reactions Listed in Vaccine Package Inserts
Written by Children’s Health Defense Team
Package inserts are available online for all vaccines licensed in the U.S. In addition to containing bits of practical information for the clinicians who administer the vaccines, theinserts provide members of the public with one of their only opportunities to learn about a vaccine’s contraindications, warnings, precautions and—perhaps most importantly—potential adverse reactions.
The inserts communicate the information about adverse reactions in two distinct sections: “Clinical trials experience” (Section 6.1) and “Data from postmarketing experience” from the U.S. or other countries (Section 6.2). In April, 2020, Children’s Health Defense summarized the postmarketing data for over three dozen vaccines given routinely to American infants, children and adolescents. That tally showed that vaccines touted for the prevention of 13 illnesses (Table 1) have been linked to at least 217 adverse medical outcomes reported post-licensure, including serious infections, autoimmune conditions, life-threatening allergies and death.
As noted in April, the postmarketing list is far from exhaustive, because manufacturers have the latitude to decide which outcomes to list in the inserts—using loose criteria determined by severity, frequency of reporting and “strength of evidence for a causal relationship.” In addition, vaccine adverse events are notoriously underreported, not least because medical schools do not teach doctors to recognize vaccine injuries. But what would the picture look like if the adverse reactions observed during clinical trials were also added to the list?
THIS COMBINATION OF CLINICAL TRIAL AND POSTMARKETING DATA PRESENTS A DRAMATIC PICTURE, WITH ALMOST DOUBLE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNDESIRABLE POST-VACCINATION OUTCOMES …
DOUBLE TROUBLE
Children’s Health Defense can now answer that question. The revised chart (Table 2) includes the adverse reactions reported in the clinical trial sections of 41 vaccine brands covering diphtheria, Haemophilus influenzae type b, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, human papillomavirus, influenza, meningococcal infection, pertussis, pneumococcal infection, polio, rotavirus, tetanus and varicella. This combination of clinical trial and postmarketing data presents a dramatic picture, with almost double the total number of undesirable post-vaccination outcomes—397 different types of reactions reported pre- and post-licensure.
Although roughly 400 adverse events is a sobering number, again, it is probably an underestimate. This is because most clinical trials follow participants for an absurdly short period of time—three days here, seven days there—and do not capture problems that arise beyond that brief window, even though clinicians recognize (and the scientific literature confirms) that vaccine reactions are not always immediate or acute. Moreover, even for those few days of monitoring, the inserts are often short on details, citing only a smattering of adverse events collected from a predetermined list of “solicited” reactions and only sometimes accepting “unsolicited” feedback. In addition, the fact that vaccine clinical trials typically compare vaccine against vaccine rather than vaccine against inert placebo makes it easy to divert attention from specific adverse reactions by simply citing “similar rates” of adverse reactions in both groups.
… AND THAT VACCINES CAN CAUSE THE VERY ILLNESSES—OR ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF THOSE ILLNESSES—THAT THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO PREVENT.
Read more at madisonarealymesupportgroup.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-25--How Many Billion Could the Covid-19 Vaccine Kill or Damage?

How Many Billion Could the Covid-19 Vaccine Kill or Damage ?
Will we become genetically modified beings through the administering @ @ @ @ @ experimental vaccines ?
Even the World Health Organization ( WHO ) has admitted that no @ @ @ @ @ .
Many leading scientists want this mass experiment stopped , but time appears to be @ @ @ @ @ you sue if things go wrong when the Big Pharma drug companies have been given @ @ @ @ @ , Dr Vernon Coleman MB ChB DSc FRSA , explains how governments and vaccine companies @ @ @ @ @ all with Covid-19 vaccines which could change our genes .
For more unbiased information about @ @ @ @ @ visit : http : //www.vernoncoleman.com Vernon Coleman ’ s book on vaccination is available on @ @ @ @ @ ebook .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated @ @ @ @ @ Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To @ @ @ @ @ Defend The Scientific Method .

How Many Billion Could the Covid-19 Vaccine Kill or Damage?
Written by Dr Vernon Coleman
Will we become genetically modified beings through the administering of a new class of experimental vaccines? Even the World Health Organization (WHO) has admitted that no one knows what will happen. Many leading scientists want this mass experiment stopped, but time appears to be running out.
Who can you sue if things go wrong when the Big Pharma drug companies have been given immunity?
International best-selling author, Dr Vernon Coleman MB ChB DSc FRSA, explains how governments and vaccine companies are planning to inject us all with Covid-19 vaccines which could change our genes.
Watch:
For more unbiased information about other important issues, please visit: http://www.vernoncoleman.com
Vernon Coleman’s book on vaccination is available on Amazon as a paperback and ebook.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-25--Bite Sized NIBLETS – Article Number 2 – Greenplate Effect Fail

This is the second in a series of Bite Sized Niblet articles which will quickly and simply deal with a wide array of errors , or the “ TALL TALE TEACHERS TELL ” in preaching the fake science of a non-existent climate crisis .
In this article we see demonstrated that The Greenplate Effect is a lie .
This is the fake effect whereby , if you place one plate behind another in space , the temperature of the first plate is increased by the presence of the 2nd plate , due to the well known pretense called back radiance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ warming science are shown below .
In both instances the pretend maths shows 1367W total in and 1367W total out and it all looks as if it ’ s real and works .
It isn ’ t and it doesn ’ t .
In in the first niblet I described how the temperature of a flat plate in space perpendicular to the suns rays achieves a steady state temperature of 394K .
( which it does , as confirmed by NASA shown at www.grc.nasa.gov . )
You can re-read that article here .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ you really do need to stop telling us realists ( actual applied science devotees ) that you know what ’ s happening when what you claim in your ‘ theory ’ can not be backed up in reality .
The 30-years-old climate crisis premised on greenhouse gas conjecture about human emissions of carbon dioxide is false .
And for all uninformed trolls who attack our empirically validated skeptic science with hand-waving and unsubstantiated disagreement , please offer your own space simulator test to prove otherwise .
Navel gazing speculation and your mere thought @ @ @ @ @ @ @ simply exposes unscientific ignorance .
For those that don ’ t know what a space simulator is , a photo is below .
Watch and see in real time that when you place a second flat plate behind the first flat plate , the maximum steady state temperature of the first plate REMAINS UNCHANGED .
This is observable , repeatable , clear-cut experimental evidence .
My work using a professionally fabricated portable testing rig can be re-read here https : //principia-scientific.org/greenplate-effect-it-doesnt-happen/ and https : //principia-scientific.org/greenplate-effect-it-does-not-happen-proof-no-2/ .
Doubters are invited to weigh the evidence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those tests what was measured is the temperature of a flat black plate on its own and then with a 2nd plate directly behind it .
In the first set up they are set apart using physical spacers ( small amount of conduction flow between plate 1 and 2 ) and in the second set up they are set apart using Velcro brackets off the glass chamber ( no conduction flow between plate 1 and 2 ) .
In both instances the first plate did not attain higher temperatures when the 2nd plate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ plate warm more quickly with the presence of the 2nd plate than without in a vacuum .
Two Plates Spaced with Spacers above heat source .
Based upon the results of this test we can reasonably declare that in the real world the concept of heating from back radiance as a science is dead .
It is a fantasy fiction fairy tale with no happy ending for climate alarmists .
The doomsaying anti-CO2 scare story is nothing more than a fiction told to us for the sole purpose of scaring and defrauding the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ To be clear ; what is shown is that thermal flows occur only because of differentials in temperature from a source of higher temperature to a source of lower temperature .
For laypersons , this is much like weather systems whereby wind ( air ) moves from high pressure to low pressure areas , and akin to potential difference in electrical circuits inducing current flow .
This truth applies not only to specific lab tests but to the whole planet and the universe as a whole .
Therefore , every time some fake @ @ @ @ @ @ @ induced Climate Crisis , Global Warming or Radiation Greenhouse Effect , you know that real-world laboratory testing exposes their lies and pretend science .
All carbon emissions targets are rendered meaningless and can have no measurable effect on climate whatsoever .
With no verifiable , hard evidence to support the fictitious greenhouse gas theory reason thus dictates that all CO2 taxes must be consigned to the trash can of bad policy .
About the author : Geraint Hughes is an independent British climate researcher and experimental scientist who has written Black Dragon : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Lie of Climate Change Science .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Bite Sized NIBLETS – Article Number 2 – Greenplate Effect Fail
Written by Geraint Hughes
This is the second in a series of Bite Sized Niblet articles which will quickly and simply deal with a wide array of errors, or the “TALL TALE TEACHERS TELL” in preaching the fake science of a non-existent climate crisis. In this article we see demonstrated that The Greenplate Effect is a lie.
This is the fake effect whereby, if you place one plate behind another in space, the temperature of the first plate is increased by the presence of the 2nd plate, due to the well known pretense called back radiance.
The consensus diagrams of fake global warming science are shown below.
In both instances the pretend maths shows 1367W total in and 1367W total out and it all looks as if it’s real and works. It isn’t and it doesn’t.
In in the first niblet I described how the temperature of a flat plate in space perpendicular to the suns rays achieves a steady state temperature of 394K. (which it does, as confirmed by NASA shown at www.grc.nasa.gov.) You can re-read that article here.
To all greenhouse gas theory promoters: you really do need to stop telling us realists (actual applied science devotees) that you know what’s happening when what you claim in your ‘theory’ cannot be backed up in reality. The 30-years-old climate crisis premised on greenhouse gas conjecture about human emissions of carbon dioxide is false.
And for all uninformed trolls who attack our empirically validated skeptic science with hand-waving and unsubstantiated disagreement, please offer your own space simulator test to prove otherwise. Navel gazing speculation and your mere thought experiments won’t do – it simply exposes unscientific ignorance. For those that don’t know what a space simulator is, a photo is below.
Watch and see in real time that when you place a second flat plate behind the first flat plate, the maximum steady state temperature of the first plate REMAINS UNCHANGED.
This is observable, repeatable, clear-cut experimental evidence. My work using a professionally fabricated portable testing rig can be re-read here https://principia-scientific.org/greenplate-effect-it-doesnt-happen/ and https://principia-scientific.org/greenplate-effect-it-does-not-happen-proof-no-2/. Doubters are invited to weigh the evidence presented and see for themselves.
In those tests what was measured is the temperature of a flat black plate on its own and then with a 2nd plate directly behind it. In the first set up they are set apart using physical spacers (small amount of conduction flow between plate 1 and 2) and in the second set up they are set apart using Velcro brackets off the glass chamber (no conduction flow between plate 1 and 2).
In both instances the first plate did not attain higher temperatures when the 2nd plate was present, neither did the first plate warm more quickly with the presence of the 2nd plate than without in a vacuum.
Two Plates Spaced with Spacers above heat source.
Two Plates Spaced with Brackets
Based upon the results of this test we can reasonably declare that in the real world the concept of heating from back radiance as a science is dead. It is a fantasy fiction fairy tale with no happy ending for climate alarmists. The doomsaying anti-CO2 scare story is nothing more than a fiction told to us for the sole purpose of scaring and defrauding the uninformed populace on a gargantuan scale.
To be clear; what is shown is that thermal flows occur only because of differentials in temperature from a source of higher temperature to a source of lower temperature. For laypersons, this is much like weather systems whereby wind (air) moves from high pressure to low pressure areas, and akin to potential difference in electrical circuits inducing current flow.
This truth applies not only to specific lab tests but to the whole planet and the universe as a whole. Therefore, every time some fake media scam artist speaks of the CO2 induced Climate Crisis, Global Warming or Radiation Greenhouse Effect, you know that real-world laboratory testing exposes their lies and pretend science.
All carbon emissions targets are rendered meaningless and can have no measurable effect on climate whatsoever. With no verifiable, hard evidence to support the fictitious greenhouse gas theory reason thus dictates that all CO2 taxes must be consigned to the trash can of bad policy.
About the author: Geraint Hughes is an independent British climate researcher and experimental scientist who has written Black Dragon: Breaking the Frizzle Frazzle of the Big Lie of Climate Change Science .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-28--Science Is Not About Consensus

Science Is Not About Consensus

Science Is Not About Consensus I ’ m sick and tired of idiots beating me over the head with pseudoscience instead of sticking to the cold , hard facts .
• Show me the hard data that standing six feet from someone is necessary .
• Show me the hard data that wearing any old rag on my face is going to materially stop the spread of a virus .
• Show me the hard data that enjoying fresh air and sunshine outdoors could be an invitation to an early death .
Please , stick to the facts and don @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ consensus ” and here ’ s why .
Maybe you ’ ve heard of Ignaz Semmelweis , an Austrian-Hungarian obstetrician with a prickly personality .
If not , you will quickly recognize his contribution to the medical profession with the three words he made famous : This was way back in 1847 .
Dr. Semmelweis provided hard data clearly demonstrating that once he and his staff began washing their hands and disinfecting equipment between patients the number of infections and deaths dropped dramatically .
Unfortunately , the scientific “ consensus ” at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ benefit to these measures and his advice was almost completely ignored by the learned medical community .
In fact , many of his medical peers were incensed with his suggestion that they could be responsible for transmitting illness and disease !
At the time doctors took pride in their soiled gowns as a mark of their industrious work !
It was commonplace for doctors who had just completed an autopsy to go to the maternity ward and deliver babies without ever washing up !
After all it was the “ consensus ” and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could they be wrong ?
Dr. Semmelweis died in an insane asylum in 1865 knowing that untold numbers of patients had needlessly suffered and died because the medical community refused to accept his findings and instead chose to follow the “ consensus ” .
Ironically , the same year Dr. Semmelweis died Dr. Joseph Lister , a British surgeon , began building on the work of French microbiologist Louis Pasteur regarding germ theory .
Dr. Lister began experimenting with various means of disinfecting wounds .
He instructed surgeons under his responsibility to not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ percent solution of carbolic acid but also wear clean gloves .
His work validated Dr. Semmelweis discoveries regarding the value of hygiene and cleanliness in medicine .
Today we all benefit from Dr. Semmelweis groundbreaking work even though he was never recognized for his contribution during his lifetime .
The moral to this story is that scientific “ consensus ” is often wrong .
In no way can it justify the hysteria , lockdowns and wealth destruction that is being manufactured by the elites .
The COVID hysteria is emotion based , not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hard facts backing up the “ science ” we ’ re told to shut up and accept the “ consensus ” .
As Dr. Semmelweis discovered the consensus is often wrong .
Authored by Jeff Harris via The Ron Paul Institute for Peace & Prosperity PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Science Is Not About Consensus
Written by Jeff Harris
I’m sick and tired of idiots beating me over the head with pseudoscience instead of sticking to the cold, hard facts.
Show me the hard data that standing six feet from someone is necessary.
Show me the hard data that wearing any old rag on my face is going to materially stop the spread of a virus.
Show me the hard data that enjoying fresh air and sunshine outdoors could be an invitation to an early death.
Please, stick to the facts and don’t dare lecture me about the “consensus” and here’s why.
Maybe you’ve heard of Ignaz Semmelweis, an Austrian-Hungarian obstetrician with a prickly personality. If not, you will quickly recognize his contribution to the medical profession with the three words he made famous:
“Wash your hands.”
This was way back in 1847.
Dr. Semmelweis provided hard data clearly demonstrating that once he and his staff began washing their hands and disinfecting equipment between patients the number of infections and deaths dropped dramatically.
Unfortunately, the scientific “consensus” at the time held that there was no benefit to these measures and his advice was almost completely ignored by the learned medical community. In fact, many of his medical peers were incensed with his suggestion that they could be responsible for transmitting illness and disease!
At the time doctors took pride in their soiled gowns as a mark of their industrious work! It was commonplace for doctors who had just completed an autopsy to go to the maternity ward and deliver babies without ever washing up! After all it was the “consensus” and with so many doctors in agreement how could they be wrong?
Dr. Semmelweis died in an insane asylum in 1865 knowing that untold numbers of patients had needlessly suffered and died because the medical community refused to accept his findings and instead chose to follow the “consensus”.
Ironically, the same year Dr. Semmelweis died Dr. Joseph Lister, a British surgeon, began building on the work of French microbiologist Louis Pasteur regarding germ theory.
Dr. Lister began experimenting with various means of disinfecting wounds. He instructed surgeons under his responsibility to not only wash their hands with a 5 percent solution of carbolic acid but also wear clean gloves. His work validated Dr. Semmelweis discoveries regarding the value of hygiene and cleanliness in medicine.
Today we all benefit from Dr. Semmelweis groundbreaking work even though he was never recognized for his contribution during his lifetime. The moral to this story is that scientific “consensus” is often wrong. In no way can it justify the hysteria, lockdowns and wealth destruction that is being manufactured by the elites.
The COVID hysteria is emotion based, not fact based. Instead of cold, hard facts backing up the “science” we’re told to shut up and accept the “consensus”. As Dr. Semmelweis discovered the consensus is often wrong.
Authored by Jeff Harris via The Ron Paul Institute for Peace & Prosperity
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-29--WHO Redefined the Term ‘Pandemic’ to Profit Big Pharma

WHO Redefined the Term ‘ Pandemic ’ to Profit Big Pharma The World Health Organization ( WHO ) redefined the term ‘ pandemic ’ to make it easier to declare a global emergency and thus allow Big Pharma to more easily seize windfall profits through the triggering of dormant disaster relief contracts .
GlaxoSmithKline is a major Big Pharma donor to the WHO .
When the WHO declares a “ pandemic ” it will result in gold rushes for pharmaceutical companies who swoop in with vaccines to save the day .
But are they actually saving anyone ?
Or do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ real narcolepsy epidemic that we saw in the swine flu “ pandemic ” of 2009—which many researchers tie to GSK ’ s Pandemrix—counter any perceived benefits of these rushed vaccines ?
The video , The Jab breaks down what happened in 2009 and why it ’ s critical that we understand this today .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend @ @ @ @

WHO Redefined the Term ‘Pandemic’ to Profit Big Pharma
Written by Children's Health Defense
The World Health Organization (WHO) redefined the term ‘pandemic’ to make it easier to declare a global emergency and thus allow Big Pharma to more easily seize windfall profits through the triggering of dormant disaster relief contracts.
Video: THE JAB: Featuring GlaxoSmithKline
GlaxoSmithKline is a major Big Pharma donor to the WHO. When the WHO declares a “pandemic” it will result in gold rushes for pharmaceutical companies who swoop in with vaccines to save the day. But are they actually saving anyone?
Or do serious adverse events such as the very real narcolepsy epidemic that we saw in the swine flu “pandemic” of 2009—which many researchers tie to GSK’s Pandemrix—counter any perceived benefits of these rushed vaccines?
The video, The Jab breaks down what happened in 2009 and why it’s critical that we understand this today.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-29--The New World Order’s COVID-19 Scamdemic: Part 1

Among many similar globalist states , The UK State is a public-private partnership between government , financial institutions , multinational corporations , global think tanks , and well funded third sector organisations , such as so called non governmental organisations ( NGO ’ s ) and large international charities .
Through a labyrinthine structure of direct funding , grant making and philanthropy , the UK State is a cohesive globalist organisation that works with selected academics , scientific institutions and mainstream media ( MSM ) outlets to advance a tightly controlled , predetermined narrative .
This designed consensus serves the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tiny group of disproportionately wealthy people .
This group of parasites , often misleadingly referred to as the “ elite , ” exploit all humanity for their own gain and to consolidate and enhance their power .
They control the money supply and the global debt , which is a debt owed to them .
Human beings are forced to pay tax which , via government procurement , flows directly to the private corporations they own .
War , security , infrastructure projects , education and health care provide profits and are used @ @ @ @ @ @ @ society .
Globally , they fund all political parties , with any realistic chance of gaining power , they own the MSM and spend billions lobbying policy makers .
Through think tanks and the actions of “ independent ” political activists , such as the FPAction Network , they directly fund political campaigns in exchange for the politician ’ s loyalty to them , not to the electorate .
Through their tax exempt grant making foundations , such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ( BMGF ) , they control the scientific @ @ @ @ @ @ @ global network of oligarchs is moving towards the final stages of its long held plan to construct a single global system of governance .
Often referred to as the New World Order ( NWO ) , it is a collaboration between supranational political organisations , like the United Nations and the European Union , controlled scientific authorities , such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( IPCC ) and the World Health Organisation ( WHO ) , global financial institutions , including the World Bank , IMF , ECB and Bank for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ organisations like the World Economic Forum ( WEF ) , NGO ’ s like the World Wildlife Fund ( WWF ) and policy making thinks tanks such as the Council on Foreign Relations ( CFR ) , Club of Rome and the Trilateral Commission .
The UK State is one , prominent tentacle of the emerging global governance system .
It has capitalised on the COVID 19 crisis to create the conditions for a new global economic and political model .
While COVID 19 appears to be a nasty strain of the common @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discuss how the UK State has spun a fake narrative about the disease to further the interests of it ’ s globalist , oligarch masters .
Managing a response to a pandemic is merely the deceptive justification for the planned re-engineering of society .
In partnership with Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and the BMGF , the WEF were chief architects of Event 201 which plotted , in quite precise detail , the global lockdown and the world ’ s media response to a global coronavirus pandemic .
Event 201 was staged @ @ @ @ @ @ @ global coronavirus pandemic broke out .
Both the government lockdown and MSM response have proceeded exactly as they predicted .
To say this is all just a coincidence , and not worthy of further scrutiny , is beyond obtuse .
The WEF ’ s extensive and detailed COVID 19 Action Platform was up and running on March 12th 2020 .
The day after the WHO declared a global COVID 19 pandemic .
It is clear from the WEF ’ s own words , that they see COVID 19 as a fantastic opportunity .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ for global governance which supersedes national sovereignty .
It is as simple as that .
It is remarkable that there are still so many who accuse any who point to this long standing New World Order plan , extensively documented and spoken about by political leaders for generations , of being so called conspiracy theorists .
One wonders if these people can read .
Referencing the COVID 19 opportunities , one of the founders , and current executive chairman , of the WEF Klaus Schwab recently wrote : Capitalism requires a reset because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , operated by the global parasite class for centuries , has reached the limits of growth .
Therefore they need to create a new economic paradigm ( the Great Reset ) both to further centralise and consolidate their power and to fix their failing business model .
Following the 2008 banking collapse , while the people were forced to suffer austerity to bail out the banks with a form of highly selective crony socialism , the parasite class simply carried on piling up the debt .
In the Basel Capital Accords III , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ speculations of banks which caused the collapse , they effectively reduced the liquidity ( capital reserve ) requirements for banks , allowing them to lend even more .
This process of allowing banks to create FIAT currency out of nothing has inevitably led to a global debt of approximately $ 260 trillion , which is more than three times the size of the planets GDP .
However , this is small potatoes compared to the scale of the financial products derivatives market .
Estimated to be somewhere between $ 600 trillion to more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ say this is only the notional amount of the debt tied up in derivative contracts , the fact remains this is all debt .
Cumulatively , there isn ’ t enough productivity on Earth even to service the interest on these debts , let alone pay them .
Ultimately this is debt owed to the oligarchs who control the world ’ s system of central banks .
It is a Mickey Mouse system allowing monopolists to seize assets using their own funny money .
While the power to create all FIAT currency , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has afforded them immense economic and political control , 2008 demonstrated that their usury fraud can , and certainly will , collapse .
Hence the Great Reset .
Responding to a pandemic , or saving lives , has nothing to do with it .
The process of transition , laid out by the WEF as the Great Reset , builds upon the sustainable development goals of the U.N ’ s Agenda 2030 .
Founded upon the generational eugenicist ideology of the NWO oligarchs , the new global governance system will be a technocracy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appointed or elected for their particular expertise , may sound appealing to some , the model proposed relies upon the destruction of nations states to be replaced by a distant global technocratic order that serves only the interests of its founding oligarchs and financial benefactors .
This technocratic system was outlined in 1974 by former US ambassador Richard N. Gardner , member of the CFR and the Trilateral Commission , in his article The Hard Road To World Order : The institutions of limited jurisdiction , such as the IPCC and WHO , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ policy across the world .
In Britain , it is the role of the UK State to deliver the obligatory policy changes in order to erode national sovereignty and create the global governance technocracy .
All globalist states are essentially unconstitutional and treasonous .
The common interest , determined by the technocrat class at the behest of their corporate oligarch paymasters , is currently replacing individual liberties and freedoms .
The human being is becoming little more than a unit to be managed and directed and , where necessary , disposed of .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ in pursuit of the common interest .
The global COVID 19 crisis is a catalysing event which has been misused to bring about the Great Reset .
In order to convince the people to comply with their orders , the UK State has inculcated the population into a state of fear .
States around the world have practised social engineering using deception , by proselytising an unquestioning faith in an illusory form of science ( scientism ) , behaviour modification , unlawful regulation and propaganda .
They have used their obedient MSM to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID 19 is significantly greater than it actually is .
In Part 2 we will focus on the deception of the UK State .
However , the same can be said for all other globalist states that have similarly responded to the claimed pandemic .
COVID 19 has been exploited in order to replace our inalienable human rights with an enforced obligation to obey public health orders .
Public health has become biosecurity and there is no longer any such thing as a healthy human being .
All humans are now biohazards and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ society for the common good .
With the British people living in unwarranted fear , the UK State has been able to introduce draconian anti-democratic ( quite literally ) legislation .
In other circumstances this would have been impossible without significant revolt .
Terrorising the public was essential to convince them to believe that the State had to remove all their rights and freedoms in order to keep them safe .
Initially deceiving the public that the “ emergency measures ” would be temporary , further behaviour modification was then used to force @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of totalitarian regulations .
The objective was to move people towards passively accepting the dictatorship of a surveillance state re-branded as “ the new normal.
” Thus far , it appears most people have been sufficiently frightened to meekly accept their enslavement .
Throughout the Great Reset transition , the public face of the globalist project has been Bill Gates .
However , while Gates has used his wealth to seize control of global public health policy , he is just the current front man for World Order 2.0 .
It is the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Revolution which the architects of the world order are capitalising upon .
For example , while there is no evidence that COVID 19 can be spread by handling cash , the MSM have repeatedly floated the idea .
This is no surprise .
the BBC are among the many media organisations directly funded by the BMGF .
Pilot schemes , such as the BMGF backed West African Wellness Pass , are already underway .
By linking biometric identification , along the lines of the BMGF funded , Rockefeller and U.N backed ID 2020 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ transactions can be centrally controlled in the rapidly approaching cashless society .
When your biometric identity includes your vaccine immunity status , there will be no necessity to legislate to make vaccines “ compulsory.
” Thus avoiding any contentious public debate .
As long as you fully comply with your orders , you will be allowed controlled access to social and economic activity .
Systems like immunity passport and vaccine certificates will be used to control freedom of movement , the right to work and to access services and the community .
As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : While vaccines may not be compulsory you won ’ t realistically be able to participate in society , employment , run a business or receive benefits , without the appropriate vaccine or immunity status .
The BMGF have already invested more than $ 21 million in an MIT project to create a microneedle vaccine delivery system that will inject a reactive die under the recipients skin which can then be scanned by a reader .
This pattern will act like an indelible bar code tattoo , enabling the global authorities to monitor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The New Zealand State has already decided to remove people from their homes and place them in quarantine facilities ( detention centres controlled by the military ) .
With an estimated population of 5 million and just 22 alleged deaths from COVID 19 in the entire country ( a population mortality risk of 0.0004 % ) , and no deaths at all for nearly three months , clearly these measures are not a response to any genuine threat from COVID 19 .
Having complete control over the testing and attribution of disease status @ @ @ @ @ @ @ potentially remove and detain its political enemies and dissenters without trial .
Those ordered to enforce biosecurity , in the “ new normal , ” have exactly the same degree of authoritarian power that was invested in similar rights abusers such as the Gestapo and the Stasi .
Does history ever teach us anything ?
This quarantine policy in New Zealand is designed to maintain the level of fear and accustom the population to dictatorship .
It also appears to be a provocation that may encourage insurrection and revolt .
With a monopoly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , violent uprisings invariably benefit the authoritarian State .
It allows them to claim legitimacy for an even more oppressive “ crack down.
” Thus far , the global response to COVID 19 has deviated little from the Rockefeller ’ s suggested Lockstep scenario in their 2010 report Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development .
Like Event 201 , this is another example of the quite extraordinary prescience of the people who form global governance policy .
They can not only predict , in almost perfect detail , what the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also nature itself .
Removing the “ infected ” from their homes and incarcerating them in detention centres mirrors the policy suggestion of Dr Michael Ryan from the WHO .
While New Zealand is the first nominally democratic state to raid family homes and remove people by force , it certainly won ’ t be the last .
The UK State has already given itself the power to do so in the Health Protections ( Coronavirus ) Regulations 2020 .
World economic activity will be administered by biosecurity States and based upon sustainable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ planned , global economy will be restricted only to permitted businesses .
Prior to his departure as governor of the Bank of England , in lockstep with the Great Reset , Mark Carney warned that companies that don ’ t follow the correct sustainability policies , “ will go bankrupt without question.
” In other words , lines of credit , without which business can not hope to function , will be limited only to those who adopt the approved polices .
This new economy will have very limited employment .
Carney ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that it would be important not to keep people in “ unproductive jobs ” and that job losses , as a result of the COVID 19 crisis , were inevitable .
They would not have been inevitable had globalist State ’ s , like the UK , not responded to the crisis by shutting down the world ’ s productive economy .
The preposterous spin of the bankers and carefully chosen economists that the UK will simply bounce back from an unprecedented 20 % drop in GDP is absurd .
With official UK @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doubling in a single year , these numbers are merely the tip of a very large , looming iceberg .
There are currently an additional estimated 7.8 million British workers furloughed .
That scheme is due to end in a couple of months .
The management consultancy firm McKinsey & Company estimate that 7.6 million UK jobs are at risk .
This will , as ever , disproportionately impact the lowest paid , with analysis suggesting that more than 50 % of those at risk of unemployment are already in jobs paying less @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the unproductive jobs and livelihoods Bailey wants to get rid of .
Across Europe and the Americas staggering levels of unemployment are seemingly unavoidable .
It is not unreasonable to envisage at least 6 million long term unemployed in the UK .
With the same pattern common to many developed nations , the social , economic and health impacts of this are almost beyond comprehension .
Many have long been warning , that the toll taken by the Lockdown response to the supposed COVID 19 pandemic will be far worse than the disease @ @ @ @ @ @ @ increasingly apparent .
There is no reason to believe official UK COVID 19 statistics , something we ’ ll discuss in Part 2 .
However , even if we accept that more than 41,000 people have died as a direct result of COVID 19 , this sad loss is likely to be relatively inconsequential compared to the loss of life as a direct result of the UK State ’ s Lockdown policy .
It is important to recognise that the global lockdown response was a political choice made to create the economic condition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not unavoidable , and there is no evidence that lockdowns make any difference to COVID 19 mortality .
South Korea , Japan and Sweden did not impose full lockdowns and all have better COVID 19 outcomes that the UK .
Research by the UK Department of Health , the Office of National Statistics ( ONS ) , the government ’ s Actuary Department and the UK Home Office estimates that 200,000 people could die as a result of re-orientating the NHS , to treat COVID 19 and little else , and from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , this “ worst case ” scenario appears conservative .
An example of the derisory “ scientism ” used to terrorise the population , in April the University of Glasgow published a study estimating average years of life lost ( YLL ) for individuals who allegedly died from COVID 19 .
Saying these were alleged deaths does not imply that no one died from COVID 19 , only that we really have no idea how many .
Nonetheless , using quite bizarre methodology , the Glasgow researchers managed to calculate that the median @ @ @ @ @ @ @ years for men and 11 years for women .
This study was based upon analysis of the outbreak in Italy , but was cited by the UK MSM to scare the British .
More than 59 % of supposed COVID 19 decedents in Italy were over 80 years old .
Current median life expectancy in the UK is 80 years for males and 83 years for females .
Nearly 60 % of those who have died from COVID 19 in the UK were over 80 years old and 20 % were over 90 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Records of Scotland ( NRS ) shows that median age of death , supposedly from COVID 19 , was 81 for men and 85 for woman .
Statistically indistinguishable from quite normal mortality .
The University of Glasgow researchers are funded by the Wellcome Trust who are the tax exempt philanthropic foundation of the multinational pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline .
The University of Glasgow are also grant recipients of the COVID 19 Therapeutics Accelerator established by the Wellcome Trust , Mastercard and the BMGF .
The Wellcome Trust and the BMGF want the world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 19 vaccines .
Despite the fact that decades of trying have failed to produce a successful vaccine against SARS , or indeed for any coronavirus strain , and that usually vaccine development takes at least 10 years , GSK and the BMGF are among those who , for some apparently inexplicable reason , are confident they can produce a successful vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 in a matter of months .
Obviously there is a huge conflict of financial interest at the heart of the University of Glasgow ’ s spurious claims about YLL ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you a conspiracy theorist .
Though ignoring it requires either a considerable degree of gullibility or a wilful intent to deceive .
Between 2001 and 2016 economic and social deprivation in England consistently accounted for a genuinely alarming 9.3 year average reduced life expectancy ( YLL ’ s ) for males and , by 2016 , shortened women ’ s lives by 7.4 years .
The economic devastation that will be wrought by the entirely unnecessary Lockdown policy of the UK State , and others , measured in YLL ’ s , will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This is the price we will all pay for the parasite class ’ determination to bring about the Great Reset and change the world ’ s economy and society to one centrally planned and controlled absolutely by them .
They are currently spending billions globally on propaganda to convince us to accept their “ new normal.
” They require our consent if their plans are going to work .
This means , in order to scupper them , all we need to do is refuse to comply .
While peaceful protest is an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what we do every day that will make the difference .
There is a nasty , fascist authoritarianism building in the UK , and elsewhere .
Yet all we need to do in order to defeat it is refuse , en masse , to follow its orders .
Unfortunately , the UK State are among those throwing everything at convincing us to believe their frankly ridiculous , scientifically illiterate , COVID 19 propaganda narrative .
We only need wander to the local supermarket and witness the faceless , muzzled majority to know the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with an existential choice .
We can either give up any childish pretensions that we live in a free and open democratic society that values liberty and plurality of opinion , and accept the fascist dictatorial rule of a global technocratic parasite , or we can exercise conscious resistance and refuse to comply with the orders of the State .
In Part 2 , we will dissect the mechanism of the UK State ’ s scamdemic .
While Lockdown policies originate at a global level , by looking at how the UK State @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they have used to convince the public to accept them , the true nature of the scamdemic can be revealed .
Authored by Iain Davis via In This Together blog PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

The New World Order’s COVID-19 Scamdemic: Part 1
Written by Iain Davis
Among many similar globalist states, The UK State is a public-private partnership between government, financial institutions, multinational corporations, global think tanks, and well funded third sector organisations, such as so called non governmental organisations (NGO’s) and large international charities.
Through a labyrinthine structure of direct funding, grant making and philanthropy, the UK State is a cohesive globalist organisation that works with selected academics, scientific institutions and mainstream media (MSM) outlets to advance a tightly controlled, predetermined narrative.
This designed consensus serves the the interests and global ambitions of a tiny group of disproportionately wealthy people.
This group of parasites, often misleadingly referred to as the “elite,” exploit all humanity for their own gain and to consolidate and enhance their power. They control the money supply and the global debt, which is a debt owed to them.
Human beings are forced to pay tax which, via government procurement, flows directly to the private corporations they own. War, security, infrastructure projects, education and health care provide profits and are used by the parasite class to socially engineer society.
Globally, they fund all political parties, with any realistic chance of gaining power, they own the MSM and spend billions lobbying policy makers.
Through think tanks and the actions of “independent” political activists, such as the FPAction Network, they directly fund political campaigns in exchange for the politician’s loyalty to them, not to the electorate.
Through their tax exempt grant making foundations, such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), they control the scientific, medical and academic orthodoxy.
This global network of oligarchs is moving towards the final stages of its long held plan to construct a single global system of governance. Often referred to as the New World Order (NWO), it is a collaboration between supranational political organisations, like the United Nations and the European Union, controlled scientific authorities, such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the World Health Organisation (WHO), global financial institutions, including the World Bank, IMF, ECB and Bank for International Settlements (BIS), globalist organisations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), NGO’s like the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and policy making thinks tanks such as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Club of Rome and the Trilateral Commission.
The UK State is one, prominent tentacle of the emerging global governance system. It has capitalised on the COVID 19 crisis to create the conditions for a new global economic and political model. While COVID 19 appears to be a nasty strain of the common coronavirus, in Part 2 we will discuss how the UK State has spun a fake narrative about the disease to further the interests of it’s globalist, oligarch masters. Managing a response to a pandemic is merely the deceptive justification for the planned re-engineering of society.
In partnership with Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and the BMGF, the WEF were chief architects of Event 201 which plotted, in quite precise detail, the global lockdown and the world’s media response to a global coronavirus pandemic. Event 201 was staged merely a matter of months before a global coronavirus pandemic broke out. Both the government lockdown and MSM response have proceeded exactly as they predicted.
To say this is all just a coincidence, and not worthy of further scrutiny, is beyond obtuse. The WEF’s extensive and detailed COVID 19 Action Platform was up and running on March 12th 2020. The day after the WHO declared a global COVID 19 pandemic.
It is clear from the WEF’s own words, that they see COVID 19 as a fantastic opportunity. They state:
The Covid-19 crisis, and the political, economic and social disruptions it has caused, is fundamentally changing the traditional context for decision-making…….As we enter a unique window of opportunity to shape the recovery, this initiative will offer insights to help inform all those determining the future state of global relations, the direction of national economies, the priorities of societies, the nature of business models and the management of a global commons.”
This is a proposal for global governance which supersedes national sovereignty. It is as simple as that.
It is remarkable that there are still so many who accuse any who point to this long standing New World Order plan, extensively documented and spoken about by political leaders for generations, of being so called conspiracy theorists. One wonders if these people can read.
Referencing the COVID 19 opportunities, one of the founders, and current executive chairman, of the WEF Klaus Schwab recently wrote:
A sharp economic downturn has already begun, and we could be facing the worst depression since the 1930s. But, while this outcome is likely, it is not unavoidable. To achieve a better outcome, the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions. Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a “Great Reset” of capitalism.
Capitalism requires a reset because the model of closed shop crony capitalism, operated by the global parasite class for centuries, has reached the limits of growth. Therefore they need to create a new economic paradigm (the Great Reset) both to further centralise and consolidate their power and to fix their failing business model.
Following the 2008 banking collapse, while the people were forced to suffer austerity to bail out the banks with a form of highly selective crony socialism, the parasite class simply carried on piling up the debt.
In the Basel Capital Accords III, supposedly designed to stop the wild market speculations of banks which caused the collapse, they effectively reduced the liquidity (capital reserve) requirements for banks, allowing them to lend even more.
This process of allowing banks to create FIAT currency out of nothing has inevitably led to a global debt of approximately $260 trillion, which is more than three times the size of the planets GDP.
However, this is small potatoes compared to the scale of the financial products derivatives market. Estimated to be somewhere between $600 trillion to more than $1 quadrillion. While some say this is only the notional amount of the debt tied up in derivative contracts, the fact remains this is all debt.
Cumulatively, there isn’t enough productivity on Earth even to service the interest on these debts, let alone pay them. Ultimately this is debt owed to the oligarchs who control the world’s system of central banks. It is a Mickey Mouse system allowing monopolists to seize assets using their own funny money.
While the power to create all FIAT currency, out of nothing but debt creation, has afforded them immense economic and political control, 2008 demonstrated that their usury fraud can, and certainly will, collapse. Hence the Great Reset. Responding to a pandemic, or saving lives, has nothing to do with it.
The process of transition, laid out by the WEF as the Great Reset, builds upon the sustainable development goals of the U.N’s Agenda 2030. Founded upon the generational eugenicist ideology of the NWO oligarchs, the new global governance system will be a technocracy.
While Technocracy, rule by technocrats appointed or elected for their particular expertise, may sound appealing to some, the model proposed relies upon the destruction of nations states to be replaced by a distant global technocratic order that serves only the interests of its founding oligarchs and financial benefactors.
This technocratic system was outlined in 1974 by former US ambassador Richard N. Gardner, member of the CFR and the Trilateral Commission, in his article The Hard Road To World Order:
Never has there been such widespread recognition by the world’s intellectual leadership of the necessity for cooperation and planning on a truly global basis. Never has there been such an extraordinary growth in the constructive potential of transnational private organizations – not just multinational corporations but international associations of every kind in which like-minded persons around the world weave effective patterns of global action… … The hope for the foreseeable future lies, not in building up a few ambitious central institutions of universal membership and general jurisdiction… but rather in… inventing or adapting institutions of limited jurisdiction and selected membership to deal with specific problems on a case-by-case basis… providing methods for changing the law and enforcing it as it changes and developing the perception of common interests… In short, the “house of world order” will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down … …but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.
The institutions of limited jurisdiction, such as the IPCC and WHO, are already in place directing national government policy across the world. In Britain, it is the role of the UK State to deliver the obligatory policy changes in order to erode national sovereignty and create the global governance technocracy. All globalist states are essentially unconstitutional and treasonous.
The common interest, determined by the technocrat class at the behest of their corporate oligarch paymasters, is currently replacing individual liberties and freedoms. The human being is becoming little more than a unit to be managed and directed and, where necessary, disposed of.
Inalienable human rights are being ignored utterly in pursuit of the common interest.
The global COVID 19 crisis is a catalysing event which has been misused to bring about the Great Reset. In order to convince the people to comply with their orders, the UK State has inculcated the population into a state of fear.
States around the world have practised social engineering using deception, by proselytising an unquestioning faith in an illusory form of science (scientism), behaviour modification, unlawful regulation and propaganda. They have used their obedient MSM to convince their peoples that the threat of COVID 19 is significantly greater than it actually is.
In Part 2 we will focus on the deception of the UK State. However, the same can be said for all other globalist states that have similarly responded to the claimed pandemic.
COVID 19 has been exploited in order to replace our inalienable human rights with an enforced obligation to obey public health orders. Public health has become biosecurity and there is no longer any such thing as a healthy human being. All humans are now biohazards and biohazards must be controlled or removed from society for the common good.
With the British people living in unwarranted fear, the UK State has been able to introduce draconian anti-democratic (quite literally) legislation.
In other circumstances this would have been impossible without significant revolt. Terrorising the public was essential to convince them to believe that the State had to remove all their rights and freedoms in order to keep them safe.
Initially deceiving the public that the “emergency measures” would be temporary, further behaviour modification was then used to force people to comply with a lengthening list of totalitarian regulations. The objective was to move people towards passively accepting the dictatorship of a surveillance state re-branded as “the new normal.” Thus far, it appears most people have been sufficiently frightened to meekly accept their enslavement.
Throughout the Great Reset transition, the public face of the globalist project has been Bill Gates. However, while Gates has used his wealth to seize control of global public health policy, he is just the current front man for World Order 2.0. It is the technological possibilities presented by the 4th Industrial Revolution which the architects of the world order are capitalising upon.
For example, while there is no evidence that COVID 19 can be spread by handling cash, the MSM have repeatedly floated the idea. This is no surprise. the BBC are among the many media organisations directly funded by the BMGF.
Pilot schemes, such as the BMGF backed West African Wellness Pass, are already underway. By linking biometric identification, along the lines of the BMGF funded, Rockefeller and U.N backed ID 2020, with cashless payment systems, all transactions can be centrally controlled in the rapidly approaching cashless society.
When your biometric identity includes your vaccine immunity status, there will be no necessity to legislate to make vaccines “compulsory.” Thus avoiding any contentious public debate. As long as you fully comply with your orders, you will be allowed controlled access to social and economic activity.
Systems like immunity passport and vaccine certificates will be used to control freedom of movement, the right to work and to access services and the community. As described by world order spokesman Bill Gates:
Eventually we will have some digital certificates to show who has recovered or been tested recently or when we have a vaccine who has received it.”
While vaccines may not be compulsory you won’t realistically be able to participate in society, employment, run a business or receive benefits, without the appropriate vaccine or immunity status.
The BMGF have already invested more than $21 million in an MIT project to create a microneedle vaccine delivery system that will inject a reactive die under the recipients skin which can then be scanned by a reader. This pattern will act like an indelible bar code tattoo, enabling the global authorities to monitor and control your whereabouts and behaviour.
The New Zealand State has already decided to remove people from their homes and place them in quarantine facilities (detention centres controlled by the military).
With an estimated population of 5 million and just 22 alleged deaths from COVID 19 in the entire country (a population mortality risk of 0.0004%), and no deaths at all for nearly three months, clearly these measures are not a response to any genuine threat from COVID 19.
Having complete control over the testing and attribution of disease status affords the biosecurity State the power to potentially remove and detain its political enemies and dissenters without trial. Those ordered to enforce biosecurity, in the “new normal,” have exactly the same degree of authoritarian power that was invested in similar rights abusers such as the Gestapo and the Stasi. Does history ever teach us anything?
This quarantine policy in New Zealand is designed to maintain the level of fear and accustom the population to dictatorship. It also appears to be a provocation that may encourage insurrection and revolt. With a monopoly on violence and the use of force, violent uprisings invariably benefit the authoritarian State. It allows them to claim legitimacy for an even more oppressive “crack down.”
Thus far, the global response to COVID 19 has deviated little from the Rockefeller’s suggested Lockstep scenario in their 2010 report Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development.
Like Event 201, this is another example of the quite extraordinary prescience of the people who form global governance policy. They can not only predict, in almost perfect detail, what the media will discover and report, but also nature itself.
Removing the “infected” from their homes and incarcerating them in detention centres mirrors the policy suggestion of Dr Michael Ryan from the WHO. While New Zealand is the first nominally democratic state to raid family homes and remove people by force, it certainly won’t be the last. The UK State has already given itself the power to do so in the Health Protections (Coronavirus) Regulations 2020.
World economic activity will be administered by biosecurity States and based upon sustainable development goals. This new, centrally planned, global economy will be restricted only to permitted businesses.
Prior to his departure as governor of the Bank of England, in lockstep with the Great Reset, Mark Carney warned that companies that don’t follow the correct sustainability policies, “will go bankrupt without question.” In other words, lines of credit, without which business cannot hope to function, will be limited only to those who adopt the approved polices.
This new economy will have very limited employment. Carney’s successor Andrew Bailey has already stated that it would be important not to keep people in “unproductive jobs” and that job losses, as a result of the COVID 19 crisis, were inevitable.
They would not have been inevitable had globalist State’s, like the UK, not responded to the crisis by shutting down the world’s productive economy.
The preposterous spin of the bankers and carefully chosen economists that the UK will simply bounce back from an unprecedented 20% drop in GDP is absurd. With official UK unemployment of 2.7 million, more than doubling in a single year, these numbers are merely the tip of a very large, looming iceberg.
There are currently an additional estimated 7.8 million British workers furloughed. That scheme is due to end in a couple of months. The management consultancy firm McKinsey & Company estimate that 7.6 million UK jobs are at risk.
This will, as ever, disproportionately impact the lowest paid, with analysis suggesting that more than 50% of those at risk of unemployment are already in jobs paying less than £10 per hour.
These are the unproductive jobs and livelihoods Bailey wants to get rid of. Across Europe and the Americas staggering levels of unemployment are seemingly unavoidable. It is not unreasonable to envisage at least 6 million long term unemployed in the UK. With the same pattern common to many developed nations, the social, economic and health impacts of this are almost beyond comprehension.
Many have long been warning, that the toll taken by the Lockdown response to the supposed COVID 19 pandemic will be far worse than the disease itself. This awful prospect is becoming increasingly apparent.
There is no reason to believe official UK COVID 19 statistics, something we’ll discuss in Part 2. However, even if we accept that more than 41,000 people have died as a direct result of COVID 19, this sad loss is likely to be relatively inconsequential compared to the loss of life as a direct result of the UK State’s Lockdown policy.
It is important to recognise that the global lockdown response was a political choice made to create the economic condition for the Great Reset. It was not unavoidable, and there is no evidence that lockdowns make any difference to COVID 19 mortality. South Korea, Japan and Sweden did not impose full lockdowns and all have better COVID 19 outcomes that the UK.
Research by the UK Department of Health, the Office of National Statistics (ONS), the government’s Actuary Department and the UK Home Office estimates that 200,000 people could die as a result of re-orientating the NHS, to treat COVID 19 and little else, and from the economic effects of Lockdown polices. Unfortunately, this “worst case” scenario appears conservative.
An example of the derisory “scientism” used to terrorise the population, in April the University of Glasgow published a study estimating average years of life lost (YLL) for individuals who allegedly died from COVID 19. Saying these were alleged deaths does not imply that no one died from COVID 19, only that we really have no idea how many.
Nonetheless, using quite bizarre methodology, the Glasgow researchers managed to calculate that the median YYL due to COVID 19 was 13 years for men and 11 years for women. This study was based upon analysis of the outbreak in Italy, but was cited by the UK MSM to scare the British. More than 59% of supposed COVID 19 decedents in Italy were over 80 years old.
Current median life expectancy in the UK is 80 years for males and 83 years for females. Nearly 60% of those who have died from COVID 19 in the UK were over 80 years old and 20% were over 90 years old.
Analysis from the National Records of Scotland (NRS) shows that median age of death, supposedly from COVID 19, was 81 for men and 85 for woman. Statistically indistinguishable from quite normal mortality.
The University of Glasgow researchers are funded by the Wellcome Trust who are the tax exempt philanthropic foundation of the multinational pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline. The University of Glasgow are also grant recipients of the COVID 19 Therapeutics Accelerator established by the Wellcome Trust, Mastercard and the BMGF.
The Wellcome Trust and the BMGF want the world to be vaccinated with their experimental COVID 19 vaccines. Despite the fact that decades of trying have failed to produce a successful vaccine against SARS, or indeed for any coronavirus strain, and that usually vaccine development takes at least 10 years, GSK and the BMGF are among those who, for some apparently inexplicable reason, are confident they can produce a successful vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 in a matter of months.
Obviously there is a huge conflict of financial interest at the heart of the University of Glasgow’s spurious claims about YLL’s. Pointing out this fact makes you a conspiracy theorist. Though ignoring it requires either a considerable degree of gullibility or a wilful intent to deceive.
Between 2001 and 2016 economic and social deprivation in England consistently accounted for a genuinely alarming 9.3 year average reduced life expectancy (YLL’s) for males and, by 2016, shortened women’s lives by 7.4 years. The economic devastation that will be wrought by the entirely unnecessary Lockdown policy of the UK State, and others, measured in YLL’s, will dwarf those lost to COVID 19.
This is the price we will all pay for the parasite class’ determination to bring about the Great Reset and change the world’s economy and society to one centrally planned and controlled absolutely by them. They are currently spending billions globally on propaganda to convince us to accept their “new normal.”
They require our consent if their plans are going to work. This means, in order to scupper them, all we need to do is refuse to comply. While peaceful protest is an important unifying right, ultimately it is what we do every day that will make the difference. There is a nasty, fascist authoritarianism building in the UK, and elsewhere. Yet all we need to do in order to defeat it is refuse, en masse, to follow its orders.
Unfortunately, the UK State are among those throwing everything at convincing us to believe their frankly ridiculous, scientifically illiterate, COVID 19 propaganda narrative. We only need wander to the local supermarket and witness the faceless, muzzled majority to know the deception is working.
We are faced with an existential choice. We can either give up any childish pretensions that we live in a free and open democratic society that values liberty and plurality of opinion, and accept the fascist dictatorial rule of a global technocratic parasite, or we can exercise conscious resistance and refuse to comply with the orders of the State.
In Part 2, we will dissect the mechanism of the UK State’s scamdemic. While Lockdown policies originate at a global level, by looking at how the UK State has implemented them, and the deception they have used to convince the public to accept them, the true nature of the scamdemic can be revealed.
Authored by Iain Davis via In This Together blog
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related