principiascientificinternational--2020-04-14--AMS Official: Our Sun Does NOT Create Earth’s Weather

AMS Official : Our Sun Does NOT Create Earth ’ s Weather The official position of the American Meteorological Society is that the Sun does not create Earth ’ s weather or climate .
I present to you direct quotes and statements gathered during peer-review with the AMS and from the Bulletins of the AMS editorial board that their position is that the Sun does not create our climate on Earth !
Follow up : I did receive a reply from the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society ’ s journal editor , about my request for reconsideration .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reading your manuscript and the reviewers ’ comments , I do not see reason to change the decision.
” Thus , the confirmed official editorial position of the AMS is that the Sun does not create our climate or Earth ’ s weather .
I have written the editor back just now with the release of this video : “ Thank you for the reply # # # # # .
Thus , I will take it as the official position of the AMS and its Bulletin ’ s journal that the Sun @ @ @ @ @ @ @ phenomena on Earth , given that this was the clearly-stated position of one of the reviewers .
You may be interested in watching this YouTube video where I discuss the BAMS peer-review process and what the AMS states as it official position of the Sun not being responsible for the creation of Earth ’ s weather and climate : [ Y/T link ] ” Sorry for the long video , but I have to fill you entirely in on why I ’ ve been gone for so long , and what project has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ ve been hard at work , and you will be amazed at what I present to you in this long video .
Blog : https : //climateofsophistry.com/2020/0… “ From The Skeptic Journal : Joseph E. Postma is a climate change denier .
He uses his master ’ s in astrophysics to try to convince others to trust his authority .
However , Postma has never been able to pass peer review in any legitimate scientific journal regarding anything he has written about climate change .
The only place he has been able @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Scientific , which is a website created by Tim Ball , a climate change denier .
I also read another negative article on you in Skeptical Science – “ This work makes extraordinary claims and yet no effort was made to put it in a real climate science journal since it was never intended to educate climate scientists or improve the field ; it is a sham , intended only to confuse casual readers and provide a citation on blogs .
The author should be ashamed.
” Firstly , I have never told @ @ @ @ @ @ @ authority ” just because I have a degree in astrophysics .
I barely ever mention it .
What I do , however , is try to explain things so that anyone can understand what is going on .
On the other hand , we can see the classical case of psychological projection here : THEY are the ones who berate everybody and everyone with their “ consensus of experts ” , their “ degrees in meteorology ” , etc.
, and that we should only listen to them because they ’ re the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ALL critics .
The alarmists are the ones who berate everyone into trusting their authority !
Secondly , we have now all witnessed what happens when an “ outsider ” to the field of climate science attempts to publish something in climate science as innocuous as pointing out the simple fact that the Sun heats the Earth , and creates Earth ’ s weather .
The climate/meteorology journal , the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , had to take the position , such as to reject the paper , that the Sun @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Earth ’ s weather !
They had to take this insane position in order to protect their political interpretation of the weather , to protect their fake greenhouse effect from being exposed as being based in flat-Earth pseudoscience .
I , Joe , should be ashamed ?
Get bent .
The climate science scam is itself utterly shameless…now exposed as being utter quack-science with a fake and ridiculous “ peer-review ” journal process .
Replies directed to Joe Postma should be made at Joe ’ s Youtube channel .
Read more at climateofsophistry.com @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

AMS Official: Our Sun Does NOT Create Earth’s Weather
Written by Joseph E Postma
The official position of the American Meteorological Society is that the Sun does not create Earth’s weather or climate.
I present to you direct quotes and statements gathered during peer-review with the AMS and from the Bulletins of the AMS editorial board that their position is that the Sun does not create our climate on Earth! Follow up:
I did receive a reply from the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society’s journal editor, about my request for reconsideration. This is his reply:
“After again reading your manuscript and the reviewers’ comments, I do not see reason to change the decision.”
Thus, the confirmed official editorial position of the AMS is that the Sun does not create our climate or Earth’s weather. I have written the editor back just now with the release of this video: “Thank you for the reply #####.
Thus, I will take it as the official position of the AMS and its Bulletin’s journal that the Sun does not create the climate and meteorological phenomena on Earth, given that this was the clearly-stated position of one of the reviewers.
You may be interested in watching this YouTube video where I discuss the BAMS peer-review process and what the AMS states as it official position of the Sun not being responsible for the creation of Earth’s weather and climate: [Y/T link]
” Sorry for the long video, but I have to fill you entirely in on why I’ve been gone for so long, and what project has been developing behind the scenes. I’ve been hard at work, and you will be amazed at what I present to you in this long video. Blog: https://climateofsophistry.com/2020/0…
A YouTube comment, and my reply: MH:
“From The Skeptic Journal: Joseph E. Postma is a climate change denier. He uses his master’s in astrophysics to try to convince others to trust his authority. However, Postma has never been able to pass peer review in any legitimate scientific journal regarding anything he has written about climate change. The only place he has been able to post his ideas are to Principia Scientific, which is a website created by Tim Ball, a climate change denier. I also read another negative article on you in Skeptical Science – “This work makes extraordinary claims and yet no effort was made to put it in a real climate science journal since it was never intended to educate climate scientists or improve the field; it is a sham, intended only to confuse casual readers and provide a citation on blogs. The author should be ashamed.”
Firstly, I have never told others that they must “trust my authority” just because I have a degree in astrophysics. I barely ever mention it. What I do, however, is try to explain things so that anyone can understand what is going on.
On the other hand, we can see the classical case of psychological projection here: THEY are the ones who berate everybody and everyone with their “consensus of experts”, their “degrees in meteorology”, etc., and that we should only listen to them because they’re the experts and we should dismiss ANY and ALL critics.
The alarmists are the ones who berate everyone into trusting their authority!
Secondly, we have now all witnessed what happens when an “outsider” to the field of climate science attempts to publish something in climate science as innocuous as pointing out the simple fact that the Sun heats the Earth, and creates Earth’s weather.
The climate/meteorology journal, the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, had to take the position, such as to reject the paper, that the Sun does not heat the Earth or create Earth’s weather!
They had to take this insane position in order to protect their political interpretation of the weather, to protect their fake greenhouse effect from being exposed as being based in flat-Earth pseudoscience. I, Joe, should be ashamed? Get bent. The climate science scam is itself utterly shameless…now exposed as being utter quack-science with a fake and ridiculous “peer-review” journal process.
Replies directed to Joe Postma should be made at Joe’s Youtube channel. Read more at climateofsophistry.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-04-14--Coronavirus: A Perspective from Britain Part 4

Evidence of possible statistical malfeasance in official reporting of the COVID19 numbers is beginning to emerge .
Andy Rowlands offers his latest report on the shenanigans in Britain , below .
This article has some more information I have become aware of in the last two weeks , and some disturbing developments in the ‘ official ’ figures for the spread of the Covid19 virus .
I check Worldometer each day , and found at the start of this week , the only country with the mild / severe cases showing is China , where cases are falling .
Every @ @ @ @ @ @ @ charts removed , so now we can not see how many cases are mild and how many are serious / critical in each country .
I also now find the UK numbers for critical cases shot up from 163 on April 4th , to 1559 on the 5th , while recoveries remained unchanged for over two weeks at 135 until April 11th , when it was finally changed to 344 .
If these UK figures are accurate , this suggests a 90 % mortality rate in Britain whether you have a mild case @ @ @ @ @ @ @ credible ?
You can check it out yourself here : - It seems to me this is a deliberate attempt to mislead the public how ‘ serious ’ this virus is .
I can not think of any other reason why those charts would be removed , other than to frighten and / or mislead the public .
I was made aware of this website a few days ago .
The Office for National Statistics [ 1 ] It has some interesting information and I have lifted the following quotes from it – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ registered in England and Wales between 28 December 2019 and 20 March 2020 ( year to date ) , and of these , 108 involved COVID-19 ( 0.1 % ) ; including deaths that occurred up to 20 March but were registered up to 25 March , the number involving COVID-19 was 210.
’ ( Emphasis added ) ‘ Because of the coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) pandemic , our regular weekly deaths release now provides a separate breakdown of the numbers of deaths involving COVID-19 .
That is , where COVID-19 or suspected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ certificate , including in combination with other health conditions .
If a death mentions COVID-19 , it will not always be the main cause of death , it will sometimes be a contributary factor.
’ ( Emphasis added ) ‘ These figures are different from the daily surveillance figures on COVID-19 deaths published by Department of Health and Social Care ( DHSC ) on the GOV.UK website , for the UK as a whole .
Figures in this report are derived from the formal process of death registration and may include cases where @ @ @ @ @ @ @ possible cases of COVID-19 , for example , where this was based on relevant symptoms but no test for the virus was conducted .
Our figures also include any deaths that occur outside hospital .
In contrast to the GOV.UK figures , we include only deaths registered in England and Wales , which is the Office for National Statistics ’ legal remit.
’ ( Emphasis added ) ‘ A death can be registered with both Covid-19 and Influenza or Pneumonia mentioned on the death certificate , therefore a death may be counted in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This means deaths are probably being counted multiple times , giving rise to misleading numbers , and some deaths attributed to the virus are assumptions .
The video below confirms much of what I wrote above .
In it , Montana physician Dr. Annie Bukacek discusses how COVID 19 death certificates are being altered to change the cause of death to Covid-related deaths , thus making the virus appear much more virulent than it is .
I was also shown this chart a few days ago , produced by the US National Center @ @ @ @ @ @ @ number of deaths in the US from pneumonia and influenza from 2013 to the present .
As you can see , the number of pneumonia & flu deaths have dropped dramatically this year in the US .
This doesn ’ t mean there have suddenly been far fewer cases , it means deaths formerly attributed to pneumonia and flu are now being attributed to the Covid virus .
For some reason , last week the other , perhaps more accurate website ; covidly.com , reduced the number of recoveries in the UK from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the day , put it up to 209 .
As of the time of writing ; April 11th , covidly is showing 588 UK recoveries .
I am still of the opinion the UK recovery figure is being kept artificially low so that the general public , who probably don ’ t know how to read the charts properly , will be frightened into staying indoors .
If you click on the graph icons on the right-hand side of the covidly site , you can see graphs for each country , but there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of mild vs serious cases .
Covidly can be seen here : - An Off-Guardian post on April 5th revealed some concerning information .
I include some quotes from the article : ‘ Bizarre guidelines from health authorities around the world are potentially including thousands of deceased patients who were never even tested .
Essentially , Italy ’ s death registration process does not differentiate between those who simply have the virus in their body , and those who are actually killed by it .
Given the amount of fear and panic Italy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the world , you would think other nations would be eager to avoid these same mistakes .
( Emphasis added ) Surely all the other countries of the world are employing rigorous standards for delineating who has , and has not , fallen victim to the pandemic , right ?
Wrong .
In fact , rather than learning from Italy ’ s example , other countries are not only repeating these mistakes but going even further .
In Germany , for example , though overall deaths and case-fatality ratio are far lower than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agency is still engaging in similar practice .
On March 20th the President of Germany ’ s Robert Koch Institute confirmed that Germany counts any deceased person who was infected with coronavirus as a Covid19 death , whether or not it actually caused death .
( Emphasis added ) In the United States , a briefing note from the CDC ’ s National Vital Statistics Service read as follows : It is important to emphasise that Coronavirus Disease 19 , or Covid-19 , should be reported for all decedents where the disease caused @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contributed to death.
’ ( Emphasis added ) ‘ Are careful records being kept to separate “ Covid-19 ” from “ presumed Covid-19 ” ?
Are the media making sure they respect the distinction in their reporting ?
Absolutely not .
Government agencies all across the UK are doing the same thing .
Northern Ireland ’ s HSC Public Health Agency is releasing weekly surveillance bulletins on the pandemic , in those reports they define a ‘ Covid19 death ’ as : individuals who have died within 28 days of first positive result @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cause of death .
( Emphasis added ) NHS England ’ s Office of National Statistics… are now including “ provisional figures ” which will be “ included in the dataset in subsequent weeks ” .
This leaves them wide open to – either accidentally or deliberately – reporting the same deaths twice… ( Emphasis added ) The official NHS guidance for doctors filling out death certificates is just as vague : “ If before death the patient had symptoms typical of COVID19 infection , but the test result has not been received @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ COVID-19 ’ as the cause of death , and then share the test result when it becomes available… ” The government is telling doctors it is OK to list “ Covid-19 ” as a cause of death when there is literally no evidence the deceased was infected .
That means there are potentially huge numbers of “ Covid19 deaths ” that were never even tested for the disease .
( Emphasis added ) By enacting this legislation the UK government has not only made false reporting of Covid19 deaths more likely , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ correct it .
Recording accurate fatality numbers in this situation is borderline impossible .
This is , at best , totally irresponsible and at worst incredibly sinister .
( Emphasis added ) At a time when good , reliable information is key to saving lives and preventing mass-panic , global governments are pursuing policies which make it near-impossible to collect that data , whilst stoking public fear .
Due to these policies , the simple fact is we have no reliable way of knowing how many people have died from this coronavirus .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
And governments and international organisations are going out of their way to keep it that way .
It ’ s time we started asking why.
’ ( Emphasis added ) The article can be seen here : - In 1972 , shortly before his death , Saul Alinsky published his book Rules for Radicals : A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals .
In it is the page shown below , detailing eight ways of how best to subjugate and control a population , highlighted in yellow – Does any of this ring @ @ @ @ @ @ @ On April 7th , The Independent newspaper reported increasing numbers of mental health incidents are being reported to police during the lockdown , and Sergeant Simon Kempton of the Police Federation , said “ …there are very early indications of an increase in suicide attempts and suicides… ” The article reported Chief Superintendent Paul Griffiths , president of the Police Superintendents ’ Association , saying “ If we continue the isolation strategies in place there is a risk that mental health issues will increase over the next weeks and months.
” The article @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the Financial Times reported there are already three million people in the UK going hungry because of the lockdown , and that is after just three weeks .
The article can be seen here : - It seems to me this whole thing is a deliberate misinformation campaign in the UK , designed to frighten the public , and make them afraid to leave their homes for any reason , as the ‘ official ’ figures suggest virtually everyone who catches it in the UK is dying , yet across the entire @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the time of writing , just 103,000 have died .
It should be remembered that all the ‘ official ’ figures are only for people admitted to hospital and who were tested to see if they have the virus .
But then again , maybe the whole idea is to try and restrict the public ’ s movements & contact with others , and shut down industry and economies in the West , and weaken the population .
Extinction Rebellion are advocating keeping the current restrictions in place permanently .
In a couple @ @ @ @ @ @ @ achieved exactly what the globalists and eco-fascists had failed to do with their climate scam in 20 years .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Coronavirus: A Perspective from Britain Part 4
Written by Andy Rowlands
Evidence of possible statistical malfeasance in official reporting of the COVID19 numbers is beginning to emerge. Andy Rowlands offers his latest report on the shenanigans in Britain, below.
This article has some more information I have become aware of in the last two weeks, and some disturbing developments in the ‘official’ figures for the spread of the Covid19 virus.
I check Worldometer each day, and found at the start of this week, the only country with the mild / severe cases showing is China, where cases are falling.
Every country with rising numbers has had those charts removed, so now we cannot see how many cases are mild and how many are serious / critical in each country.
I also now find the UK numbers for critical cases shot up from 163 on April 4th, to 1559 on the 5th, while recoveries remained unchanged for over two weeks at 135 until April 11th, when it was finally changed to 344. If these UK figures are accurate, this suggests a 90{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} mortality rate in Britain whether you have a mild case or not. Do readers find this credible?
You can check it out yourself here:-
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries
It seems to me this is a deliberate attempt to mislead the public how ‘serious’ this virus is. I cannot think of any other reason why those charts would be removed, other than to frighten and / or mislead the public.
I was made aware of this website a few days ago. The Office for National Statistics [1]
It has some interesting information and I have lifted the following quotes from it –
‘A total of 138,913 deaths were registered in England and Wales between 28 December 2019 and 20 March 2020 (year to date), and of these, 108 involved COVID-19 (0.1{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}); including deaths that occurred up to 20 March but were registered up to 25 March, the number involving COVID-19 was 210.’ (Emphasis added) ‘Because of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, our regular weekly deaths release now provides a separate breakdown of the numbers of deaths involving COVID-19. That is, where COVID-19 or suspected COVID-19 was mentioned anywhere on the death certificate, including in combination with other health conditions. If a death mentions COVID-19, it will not always be the main cause of death, it will sometimes be a contributary factor.’ (Emphasis added) ‘These figures are different from the daily surveillance figures on COVID-19 deaths published by Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) on the GOV.UK website, for the UK as a whole. Figures in this report are derived from the formal process of death registration and may include cases where the doctor completing the death certificate diagnosed possible cases of COVID-19, for example, where this was based on relevant symptoms but no test for the virus was conducted. Our figures also include any deaths that occur outside hospital. In contrast to the GOV.UK figures, we include only deaths registered in England and Wales, which is the Office for National Statistics’ legal remit.’ (Emphasis added) ‘A death can be registered with both Covid-19 and Influenza or Pneumonia mentioned on the death certificate, therefore a death may be counted in both categories.’ (Emphasis added)
This means deaths are probably being counted multiple times, giving rise to misleading numbers, and some deaths attributed to the virus are assumptions.
The video below confirms much of what I wrote above. In it, Montana physician Dr. Annie Bukacek discusses how COVID 19 death certificates are being altered to change the cause of death to Covid-related deaths, thus making the virus appear much more virulent than it is.
I was also shown this chart a few days ago, produced by the US National Center for Health Statistics. It shows the number of deaths in the US from pneumonia and influenza from 2013 to the present.
As you can see, the number of pneumonia & flu deaths have dropped dramatically this year in the US. This doesn’t mean there have suddenly been far fewer cases, it means deaths formerly attributed to pneumonia and flu are now being attributed to the Covid virus.
For some reason, last week the other, perhaps more accurate website; covidly.com, reduced the number of recoveries in the UK from 205 to 192, then later in the day, put it up to 209. As of the time of writing; April 11th, covidly is showing 588 UK recoveries. I am still of the opinion the UK recovery figure is being kept artificially low so that the general public, who probably don’t know how to read the charts properly, will be frightened into staying indoors.
If you click on the graph icons on the right-hand side of the covidly site, you can see graphs for each country, but there is still nothing to show the number of mild vs serious cases. Covidly can be seen here:-
https://covidly.com/?fbclid=IwAR0Iw_WLniK5SGyCZbTBQXHxb1VDnlMEA4K5w3AWADkPdLRwhSaPw52gF3o
An Off-Guardian post on April 5th revealed some concerning information. I include some quotes from the article:
‘Bizarre guidelines from health authorities around the world are potentially including thousands of deceased patients who were never even tested. Essentially, Italy’s death registration process does not differentiate between those who simply have the virus in their body, and those who are actually killed by it. Given the amount of fear and panic Italy’s comparatively alarming numbers caused around the world, you would think other nations would be eager to avoid these same mistakes. (Emphasis added) Surely all the other countries of the world are employing rigorous standards for delineating who has, and has not, fallen victim to the pandemic, right? Wrong. In fact, rather than learning from Italy’s example, other countries are not only repeating these mistakes but going even further. In Germany, for example, though overall deaths and case-fatality ratio are far lower than Italy’s, their public health agency is still engaging in similar practice. On March 20th the President of Germany’s Robert Koch Institute confirmed that Germany counts any deceased person who was infected with coronavirus as a Covid19 death, whether or not it actually caused death. (Emphasis added) In the United States, a briefing note from the CDC’s National Vital Statistics Service read as follows: It is important to emphasise that Coronavirus Disease 19, or Covid-19, should be reported for all decedents where the disease caused or is presumed to have caused or contributed to death.’ (Emphasis added)
Presumed?
‘Are careful records being kept to separate “Covid-19” from “presumed Covid-19”? Are the media making sure they respect the distinction in their reporting? Absolutely not. Government agencies all across the UK are doing the same thing. Northern Ireland’s HSC Public Health Agency is releasing weekly surveillance bulletins on the pandemic, in those reports they define a ‘Covid19 death’ as: individuals who have died within 28 days of first positive result, whether or not COVID-19 was the cause of death. (Emphasis added) NHS England’s Office of National Statistics… are now including “provisional figures” which will be “included in the dataset in subsequent weeks”. This leaves them wide open to – either accidentally or deliberately – reporting the same deaths twice… (Emphasis added) The official NHS guidance for doctors filling out death certificates is just as vague: “If before death the patient had symptoms typical of COVID19 infection, but the test result has not been received, it would be satisfactory to give ‘COVID-19’ as the cause of death, and then share the test result when it becomes available…” The government is telling doctors it is OK to list “Covid-19” as a cause of death when there is literally no evidence the deceased was infected. That means there are potentially huge numbers of “Covid19 deaths” that were never even tested for the disease. (Emphasis added) By enacting this legislation the UK government has not only made false reporting of Covid19 deaths more likely, they actively removed the safeguards designed to correct it. Recording accurate fatality numbers in this situation is borderline impossible. This is, at best, totally irresponsible and at worst incredibly sinister. (Emphasis added) At a time when good, reliable information is key to saving lives and preventing mass-panic, global governments are pursuing policies which make it near-impossible to collect that data, whilst stoking public fear. Due to these policies, the simple fact is we have no reliable way of knowing how many people have died from this coronavirus. We have no hard data at all. And governments and international organisations are going out of their way to keep it that way. It’s time we started asking why.’ (Emphasis added)
The article can be seen here:-
https://off-guardian.org/2020/04/05/covid19-death-figures-a-substantial-over-estimate/?fbclid=IwAR2QPFUCpZxYZconWk2XoKEy6llpxvJyZk-MJZkCa361SY-fC9Zq6jHTPPw
In 1972, shortly before his death, Saul Alinsky published his book Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals. In it is the page shown below, detailing eight ways of how best to subjugate and control a population, highlighted in yellow –
Does any of this ring a bell in the current situation?
On April 7th, The Independent newspaper reported increasing numbers of mental health incidents are being reported to police during the lockdown, and Sergeant Simon Kempton of the Police Federation, said “…there are very early indications of an increase in suicide attempts and suicides…”
The article reported Chief Superintendent Paul Griffiths, president of the Police Superintendents’ Association, saying “If we continue the isolation strategies in place there is a risk that mental health issues will increase over the next weeks and months.”
The article can be seen here:-
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-suicide-rates-uk-mental-health-support-a9451086.html
Yesterday, the Financial Times reported there are already three million people in the UK going hungry because of the lockdown, and that is after just three weeks. The article can be seen here:-
https://www.ft.com/content/e5061be6-2978-4c0b-aa68-f372a2526826?accessToken=–sanitized–&sharetype=gift{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}3Ftoken{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}3D–sanitized–&fbclid=IwAR1UtZRCycuBji0iZ4BSiyZhDwbi6JQdLX_4LDa-8Kv_lwWtJLKpepAbu9E
It seems to me this whole thing is a deliberate misinformation campaign in the UK, designed to frighten the public, and make them afraid to leave their homes for any reason, as the ‘official’ figures suggest virtually everyone who catches it in the UK is dying, yet across the entire rest of the world, as of the time of writing, just 103,000 have died.
It should be remembered that all the ‘official’ figures are only for people admitted to hospital and who were tested to see if they have the virus.
But then again, maybe the whole idea is to try and restrict the public’s movements & contact with others, and shut down industry and economies in the West, and weaken the population. Extinction Rebellion are advocating keeping the current restrictions in place permanently. In a couple of months, those behind this have achieved exactly what the globalists and eco-fascists had failed to do with their climate scam in 20 years.
[1] https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-04-13--The WHO Lied – COVID19 Death Rate Is 0.4% Not 3.4% — Same as Flu

The WHO Lied – COVID19 Death Rate Is 0.4 % Not 3.4 % — Same as Flu A study released in Germany last week found the mortality rate of the coronavirus , factoring in the asymptomatic cases , is much lower than is being reported .
The German study found that around 15 % of the population in the Gangelt had the coronavirus antibodies and were infected at some point without knowing it .
Using this data the researchers concluded that the coronavirus mortality rate was 0.37 % .
A second study in Iceland found that half of those tested @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 7 in 1600 known COVID-19 cases ended in death .
This is good news .
It shows the coronavirus is only slightly more deadly than a seasonal flu .
WHO leader , Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus , stoked fear across the planet when he claimed the COVID-19 had a 3.4 % mortality rate and then compared that to the annual estimated flu mortality rate of 0.1 % .
It ’ s not clear if he yet understands his mistake .
Regardless , it sent the global community into a collective economic meltdown .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ economic damage will be but we know it will be huge .
And we are still nowhere near the total flu deaths we see each year .
And now we know Tedros was off by a factor of 10 !
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

The WHO Lied – COVID19 Death Rate Is 0.4% Not 3.4% — Same as Flu
Written by Jim Hoft
A study released in Germany last week found the mortality rate of the coronavirus, factoring in the asymptomatic cases, is much lower than is being reported.
The German study found that around 15{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of the population in the Gangelt had the coronavirus antibodies and were infected at some point without knowing it. Using this data the researchers concluded that the coronavirus mortality rate was 0.37{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}.
Good news from a population screening study!https://t.co/SaV6Rn3Aib
— reason (@reason) April 10, 2020
A second study in Iceland found that half of those tested had had the coronavirus and that only 7 in 1600 known COVID-19 cases ended in death.
This is good news. It shows the coronavirus is only slightly more deadly than a seasonal flu.
WHO leader, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, stoked fear across the planet when he claimed the COVID-19 had a 3.4{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} mortality rate and then compared that to the annual estimated flu mortality rate of 0.1{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}.
It’s not clear if he yet understands his mistake.
Regardless, it sent the global community into a collective economic meltdown.
We don’t know how horrible the economic damage will be but we know it will be huge.
And we are still nowhere near the total flu deaths we see each year.
And now we know Tedros was off by a factor of 10!
Read more at www.thegatewaypundit.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-04-13--Most Sea Ice Since 1988 at Svalbard, Norway

Most Sea Ice Since 1988 at Svalbard , Norway From 3-7 April this year , sea ice around Svalbard , Norway , has been the highest since 1988 , but only 6th or 7th highest since records began in the 1970s .
Pack ice is year surrounds Bear Island ( Bjørnøya ) at the southern end of the archipelago for the first time since 2009 at this date , and continues the pattern of high extent and thickness of ice in the Barents Sea since last summer .
On the 3rd of April 2020 , it looked like the highest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ according to the NIS graph above .
But because the graph only goes back to 1981 ( see the ‘ Min/Max ’ dotted line ) , that ’ s not the case : it was only the sixth-highest compared to records that go back to at least 1969 ( and 81,483 sq km above the 1981-2010 average ) .
However , the difference between extents on 3 April 1988 ( 511,048 sq km ) must be almost statistically indistinguishable from 3 April 2020 ( 507,194 sq km ) because it ’ s certainly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the one presented to the public above .
Although their archived ice charts available online only go back to 1998 for April , the NIS noted on 3 April 2020 via Twitter [ my bold ] : On the 7th of April , NIS noted the ice was similarly 7th highest on record ( 79,124 sq km above the 1981-2010 average at 502,563 sq km ) , compared to records going back to at least 1969 .
The ice that surrounded Bjørnøya at the southern end of the archipelago last year in early @ @ @ @ @ @ @ island for the first time since 2011 , was gone by 21 March or so .
Although 2004 had the highest Svalbard extent at the end of February ( making 2020 the second-highest at that date ) , there was no ice anywhere near Bjørnøya in early April 2004 .
While there was ice that far south in 2000 at 3 April , as well as in 2001 and 2006 and 2009 at that date , the presence of ice surrounding Bjørnøya in 2020 was still a rare occurrence in early April : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even included on the Svalbard ice map for 2009 , below : We likely won ’ t hear about March and April visitors to Bjørnøya until later in the year .
Below is the global ice extent on 7 April 2020 .
Note that while ice is gone from the Gulf of St. Lawrence , polar bears seldom venture that far south , as is also true for the southern Bering Sea in the western Arctic , where the ice will likely retreat north quickly : Graph below shows how global ice extent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ compares to the long term average ( back to 1979 ) : March extent average for 2020 came in higher than the last five years ( or , as the NSIDC prefer to put it , the ’ 11th lowest ’ since 1979 ) : Dr. Susan Crockford is a zoologist ( former adjunct professor , University of Victoria ) specializing in Holocene mammals , including polar bears and walruses .
Her new book is called The Polar Bear Catastrophe That Never Happened ( Amazon ) .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Most Sea Ice Since 1988 at Svalbard, Norway
Written by Susan J Crockford PhD
image source: wildlifearchives.com
From 3-7 April this year, sea ice around Svalbard, Norway, has been the highest since 1988, but only 6th or 7th highest since records began in the 1970s.
Pack ice is year surrounds Bear Island (Bjørnøya) at the southern end of the archipelago for the first time since 2009 at this date, and continues the pattern of high extent and thickness of ice in the Barents Sea since last summer.
On the 3rd of April 2020, it looked like the highest extent on record had been reached, according to the NIS graph above.
But because the graph only goes back to 1981 (see the ‘Min/Max’ dotted line), that’s not the case: it was only the sixth-highest compared to records that go back to at least 1969 (and 81,483 sq km above the 1981-2010 average).
However, the difference between extents on 3 April 1988 (511,048 sq km) must be almost statistically indistinguishable from 3 April 2020 (507,194 sq km) because it’s certainly indistinguishable on a graph as crude as the one presented to the public above.
Although their archived ice charts available online only go back to 1998 for April, the NIS noted on 3 April 2020 via Twitter [my bold]:
“The last time there was this much #seaice around #Svalbard on this day of the year was 1988, with 511,048 sq km. This year’s extent has only been exceeded by, in ascending order, 1988, 1971, 1977, 1969 and 1978.“
On the 7th of April, NIS noted the ice was similarly 7th highest on record (79,124 sq km above the 1981-2010 average at 502,563 sq km), compared to records going back to at least 1969.
The ice that surrounded Bjørnøya at the southern end of the archipelago last year in early March, which brought bears to the island for the first time since 2011, was gone by 21 March or so.
Although 2004 had the highest Svalbard extent at the end of February (making 2020 the second-highest at that date), there was no ice anywhere near Bjørnøya in early April 2004.
While there was ice that far south in 2000 at 3 April, as well as in 2001 and 2006 and 2009 at that date, the presence of ice surrounding Bjørnøya in 2020 was still a rare occurrence in early April: note that Bear Island isn’t even included on the Svalbard ice map for 2009, below:
We likely won’t hear about March and April visitors to Bjørnøya until later in the year.
Below is the global ice extent on 7 April 2020. Note that while ice is gone from the Gulf of St. Lawrence, polar bears seldom venture that far south, as is also true for the southern Bering Sea in the western Arctic, where the ice will likely retreat north quickly:
Graph below shows how global ice extent in 2020 and 2006 at 7 April compares to the long term average (back to 1979):
March extent average for 2020 came in higher than the last five years (or, as the NSIDC prefer to put it, the ’11th lowest’ since 1979):
Dr. Susan Crockford is a zoologist (former adjunct professor, University of Victoria) specializing in Holocene mammals, including polar bears and walruses. Her new book is called The Polar Bear Catastrophe That Never Happened (Amazon).
Read more at Polar Bear Science
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-03-13--Why a Medical Doctor is Not Worried About Coronavirus

Why a Medical Doctor is Not Worried About Coronavirus You can ’ t turn on a computer screen , a TV , or look at a phone without dozens of new stories about how the deadly Coronavirus is lurking like a silent killer waiting to end millions of lives .
You hear terms like “ pandemic ” , ICU ” , and “ Emergency Funding ” .
The shelves at COSTCO are bare .
Any sane person would be scared and freaked out at this point .
However , I ’ m neither .
Why ?
Because if you look @ @ @ @ @ @ @ through the media hype machine designed to whip up a frenzy , what you see is VERY different than a deadly pandemic killing spree , you see something much less lethal and more like a nasty flu bug .
Let ’ s dig in .
To quickly review , the Coronavirus disease is much like the flu .
Its scientific name is COVID-19 .
‘ CO ’ stands for ‘ corona , ’ ‘ ‘ VI ’ for ‘ virus , ’ and ‘ D ’ for disease .
The “ -19 ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2019 .
The common name often used for this disease , called “ Coronavirus ” is really medical slang as that ’ s just a common virus type .
The virus that causes the disease has been named SARS-CoV-2 ( Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 ) .
Now let ’ s dig into why is everyone so freaked out .
If you ’ re a virologist or epidemiologist , the “ big one ” happened just after World War I .
This was called the 1918 Spanish Flu Pandemic .
This influenza @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and killed an estimated 30 million people worldwide ( 1.7 % of the world ’ s population ) .
That number is hard to compare to today because this was before modern medicine and intensive care techniques that began in the Korean War and Vietnam .
Now we have ventilators , anti-viral , drugs , and modern life support .
In 1918 we didn ’ t even have simple things that can save lives like the widespread use of oxygen .
How Lethal Is the Regular Flu ?
The average seasonal flu kills @ @ @ @ @ @ @ year ( 1 ) .
Before I dive into the Coronavirus you need to think about that for a second .
Half a million people die from the average flu bug each winter .
The CDC recently announced that the seasonal flu has killed 20,000 people in the United States this year with 350,000 hospitalizations ( 5 ) .
To date , worldwide , less than 4,000 people have died of Coronavirus .
That ’ s less than 1 % of the number of people who die from the seasonal flu .
Why @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over the death rate per 100 patients reported out of Wuhan China , where the Coronavirus began .
At one point , we heard very high numbers like 3-4 % of everyone who contracted the disease or even twenty percent or more of the elderly .
The average seasonal flu has much lower death rates .
So just how lethal is this Coronavirus disease ( COVID-19 ) versus the average flu ?
After all , if it ’ s a real killer of healthy young and middle-aged people you should be freaked out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like a bad flu bug , you should just go about your business , wash your hands frequently , and not be concerned .
Hence , this is the multi-billion dollar question .
How Lethal Is the Average Seasonal Flu ?
This is a really interesting one .
From the paper above , mortality rates as low as 0.05 % to as high as 3.5 % have been reported .
The fact that the high number is from southeast Asia is important ( see below ) .
The new death rate for seasonal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recent models , is 0.03 % for people under 65 years of age and about 3 % for the elderly over 75 .
You also need to keep in mind that most of the young who die from the seasonal flu have problems like a significant respiratory disease .
The most accurate data on case fatalities is from the only natural experiment that exists , the Diamond Princess cruise .
Why a cruise ship ?
Because this is a closed environment where we can accurately measure every person who gets sick and know @ @ @ @ @ @ @ based on that exposure .
The cruise ship data shows a fatality rate of 0.85 % .
All of the people that perished were over 70 , which is much more like the seasonal flu .
In addition , the ability of the virus to spread was again , not that impressive as only about 20 % got the virus .
So while this bug is nasty , it ’ s NOT the middle-aged killer that the media has been making it out to be .
[ 3/11/20 update ] Here ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ published : • The outside of Wuhan Chinese death rate reported by their CDC is 0.4 % ( 6 ) • The South Korean death rate being reported is 0.65 % ( 7 ) Why the Huge Difference in Death Rates ?
First , the death rates in the first part of any outbreak are always wildly inflated .
Why ?
They are based on only the number of people who are sick and are tested for the virus while ignoring the greater number of people who contract the virus , get a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and never get tested .
When you add in all of those healthy people who shrugged the virus off , the death rates almost always plummet .
Here are a few science-focused articles on this topic : • SLATE-COVID-19 Isn ’ t As Deadly As We Think • NPR-Why The Death Rate From Coronavirus Is Plunging In China Second , there are other factors that could explain the differences .
For example , 2/3rds of Chinese men smoke ( compared to 15 % of US men ) ( 4 ) .
China also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ US : China is also significantly denser ( 4-5X the US ) , which facilitates viral transmission .
In addition , China has many “ Wet Markets ” where live animals are kept in tight conditions and then slaughtered on the spot to be sold as food .
You honestly couldn ’ t create a more perfect animal to human viral transmission model .
In fact , it ’ s believed the coronavirus began in an animal sold in these markets called a pangolin .
What Should You Do ?
If you ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 70 without any known respiratory problems or other serious health conditions , then the list below applies to you .
If you ’ re elderly and/or have respiratory or other serious health problems like heart disease , then you ’ re in a higher risk category , more on that below .
• Panic and go clear out your local grocery store shelves !
• Buy masks unless you ’ re the one that has a cough • Wash your hands frequently with soap for 20 seconds !
• Use hand sanitizer when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( must be > 60 % alcohol ) • Ask for a local COVID-19 test if you think you have the flu ( the symptoms of this one are a fever and a dry cough ) We ’ ve seen major conventions canceling their events and the airlines are all battening the hatches for a bad spring .
Am I canceling any of the travel I have planned for March or April ?
Nope !
But I will enjoy the empty seats !
Why ?
The elderly death rates for the coronavirus are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
While those patients that are severely impacted will need aggressive medical care , the number of people in that category is very small .
In addition , check out the CDC graph below that shows that viral flu transmission goes way down after March ( 3 ) .
While the coronavirus isn ’ t the seasonal flu , transmitting it seems to obey the same rules as viral influenza .
Again , if you ’ re in a high-risk category , you may want to be more careful .
For now , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have a respiratory problem that ’ s being actively treated ( like COPD ) , you might want to consider limiting travel and contacts .
However , even then , you have to put this in context .
You need to ask yourself if you would cancel trips and stay indoors if you knew that it was a bad flu season with a bad bug or would you just go about your business and wash your hands frequently ?
That ’ s a choice only you can make .
Finally , authorities will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the evolving data being collected here and elsewhere , so pay attention to those public health advisories .
For example , in the US this may take the form of limiting nursing home visits .
As another example , in Italy , they have recently closed down tourism to the Lombardy region .
The upshot ?
At the end of the day , the media is doing what they always do , not letting a good tragedy go to waste when there are eyeballs to sell to advertisers .
However , after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we have , I am NOT concerned about the Coronavirus .
I am , however , looking forward to some empty planes and airports !
• Click here for Coronavirus Episode 3-Keep Calm and Carry On… [ We usually allow comments on this blog , but the comments on this post have not generally been constructive , so they will be suspended. ]
.
( 1 ) Iuliano AD , Roguski KM , Chang HH , et al .
Estimates of global seasonal influenza-associated respiratory mortality : a modelling study [ published correction @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ; : ] .
Lancet .
2018 ; 391 ( 10127 ) :1285–1300 .
doi : 10.1016/S0140-6736 ( 17 ) 33293-2 ( 2 ) Faust J. COVID-19 Isn ’ t As Deadly As We Think .
Slate .
https : //slate.com/technology/2020/03/coronavirus-mortality-rate-lower-than-we-think.html Accessed 3/6/20 .
( 4 ) Chen Z , Peto R , Zhou M , et al .
Contrasting male and female trends in tobacco-attributed mortality in China : evidence from successive nationwide prospective cohort studies .
Lancet .
2015 ; 386 ( 10002 ) :1447–1456 .
doi : 10.1016/S0140-6736 ( 15 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Disease Control and Prevention CCDC Weekly .
The Epidemiological Characteristics of an Outbreak of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Diseases ( COVID-19 ) — China , 2020 .
Vol .
2 .
No .
8. http : //weekly.chinacdc.cn/fileCCDCW/journal/article/ccdcw/2020/8/PDF/COVID-19.pdf ( 7 ) Kolate G. Coronavirus Is Very Different From the Spanish Flu of 1918 .
Here ’ s How .
The New York Times .
https : //www.nytimes.com/2020/03/09/science/coronavirus-is-very-different-from-the-spanish-flu-of-1918-heres-how.html Accessed 3/10/20 About the author : Chris Centeno , MD is a specialist in regenerative medicine and the new field of Interventional Orthopedics .
Centeno pioneered orthopedic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ responsible for a large amount of the published research on stem cell use for orthopedic applications .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Why a Medical Doctor is Not Worried About Coronavirus
Written by Chris Centeno, MD
You can’t turn on a computer screen, a TV, or look at a phone without dozens of new stories about how the deadly Coronavirus is lurking like a silent killer waiting to end millions of lives. You hear terms like “pandemic”, ICU”, and “Emergency Funding”.
The shelves at COSTCO are bare. Any sane person would be scared and freaked out at this point. However, I’m neither. Why? Because if you look at the actual science emerging and read through the media hype machine designed to whip up a frenzy, what you see is VERY different than a deadly pandemic killing spree, you see something much less lethal and more like a nasty flu bug. Let’s dig in.
Coronavirus
To quickly review, the Coronavirus disease is much like the flu. Its scientific name is COVID-19. ‘CO’ stands for ‘corona,’ ‘‘VI’ for ‘virus,’ and ‘D’ for disease. The “-19” indicates that it was first detected in 2019. The common name often used for this disease, called “Coronavirus” is really medical slang as that’s just a common virus type. The virus that causes the disease has been named SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2). Now let’s dig into why is everyone so freaked out.
The 1918 Pandemic
If you’re a virologist or epidemiologist, the “big one” happened just after World War I. This was called the 1918 Spanish Flu Pandemic. This influenza virus had a 2-3% mortality rate and killed an estimated 30 million people worldwide (1.7% of the world’s population). That number is hard to compare to today because this was before modern medicine and intensive care techniques that began in the Korean War and Vietnam. Now we have ventilators, anti-viral, drugs, and modern life support. In 1918 we didn’t even have simple things that can save lives like the widespread use of oxygen.
How Lethal Is the Regular Flu?
The average seasonal flu kills between 291,000 to 646,000 people worldwide each year (1). Before I dive into the Coronavirus you need to think about that for a second. Half a million people die from the average flu bug each winter. The CDC recently announced that the seasonal flu has killed 20,000 people in the United States this year with 350,000 hospitalizations (5). To date, worldwide, less than 4,000 people have died of Coronavirus. That’s less than 1% of the number of people who die from the seasonal flu.
Why Then the Panic?
The panic is over the death rate per 100 patients reported out of Wuhan China, where the Coronavirus began. At one point, we heard very high numbers like 3-4% of everyone who contracted the disease or even twenty percent or more of the elderly. The average seasonal flu has much lower death rates.
How Lethal Is Coronavirus?
So just how lethal is this Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) versus the average flu? After all, if it’s a real killer of healthy young and middle-aged people you should be freaked out. If it’s really just like a bad flu bug, you should just go about your business, wash your hands frequently, and not be concerned. Hence, this is the multi-billion dollar question.
How Lethal Is the Average Seasonal Flu?
This is a really interesting one. From the paper above, mortality rates as low as 0.05% to as high as 3.5% have been reported. The fact that the high number is from southeast Asia is important (see below). The new death rate for seasonal flu worldwide, based on the most recent models, is 0.03% for people under 65 years of age and about 3% for the elderly over 75. You also need to keep in mind that most of the young who die from the seasonal flu have problems like a significant respiratory disease.
How Lethal Is COVID-19?
The most accurate data on case fatalities is from the only natural experiment that exists, the Diamond Princess cruise. Why a cruise ship? Because this is a closed environment where we can accurately measure every person who gets sick and know the real number of people who perish based on that exposure.
The cruise ship data shows a fatality rate of 0.85%. All of the people that perished were over 70, which is much more like the seasonal flu. In addition, the ability of the virus to spread was again, not that impressive as only about 20% got the virus. So while this bug is nasty, it’s NOT the middle-aged killer that the media has been making it out to be.
[3/11/20 update] Here’s some new data since this post first published:
The outside of Wuhan Chinese death rate reported by their CDC is 0.4% (6)
The South Korean death rate being reported is 0.65% (7)
Why the Huge Difference in Death Rates?
First, the death rates in the first part of any outbreak are always wildly inflated. Why? They are based on only the number of people who are sick and are tested for the virus while ignoring the greater number of people who contract the virus, get a little sick for a few days, and never get tested. When you add in all of those healthy people who shrugged the virus off, the death rates almost always plummet. Here are a few science-focused articles on this topic:
Second, there are other factors that could explain the differences. For example, 2/3rds of Chinese men smoke (compared to 15% of US men) (4). China also has severe air pollution compared to the US:
China is also significantly denser (4-5X the US), which facilitates viral transmission. In addition, China has many “Wet Markets” where live animals are kept in tight conditions and then slaughtered on the spot to be sold as food. You honestly couldn’t create a more perfect animal to human viral transmission model. In fact, it’s believed the coronavirus began in an animal sold in these markets called a pangolin.
What Should You Do?
If you’re healthy and under the age of 70 without any known respiratory problems or other serious health conditions, then the list below applies to you. If you’re elderly and/or have respiratory or other serious health problems like heart disease, then you’re in a higher risk category, more on that below.
Don’t:
Panic and go clear out your local grocery store shelves!
Buy masks unless you’re the one that has a cough
Cancel trips
Do:
Wash your hands frequently with soap for 20 seconds!
Use hand sanitizer when you can’t wash your hands (must be >60% alcohol)
Stay home if you’re sick
Ask for a local COVID-19 test if you think you have the flu (the symptoms of this one are a fever and a dry cough)
Observe strict quarantine rules if you test positive
Why Canceling Trips Is a Bad Idea
We’ve seen major conventions canceling their events and the airlines are all battening the hatches for a bad spring. Am I canceling any of the travel I have planned for March or April? Nope! But I will enjoy the empty seats!
Why? The elderly death rates for the coronavirus are strikingly similar to a bad flu bug. While those patients that are severely impacted will need aggressive medical care, the number of people in that category is very small.
In addition, check out the CDC graph below that shows that viral flu transmission goes way down after March (3). While the coronavirus isn’t the seasonal flu, transmitting it seems to obey the same rules as viral influenza.
High-Risk Individuals
Again, if you’re in a high-risk category, you may want to be more careful. For now, if you’re over 70 or have a respiratory problem that’s being actively treated (like COPD), you might want to consider limiting travel and contacts. However, even then, you have to put this in context. You need to ask yourself if you would cancel trips and stay indoors if you knew that it was a bad flu season with a bad bug or would you just go about your business and wash your hands frequently? That’s a choice only you can make.
Finally, authorities will make local recommendations for high-risk individuals based on the evolving data being collected here and elsewhere, so pay attention to those public health advisories. For example, in the US this may take the form of limiting nursing home visits. As another example, in Italy, they have recently closed down tourism to the Lombardy region.
The upshot? At the end of the day, the media is doing what they always do, not letting a good tragedy go to waste when there are eyeballs to sell to advertisers. However, after a deep dive into the best data we have, I am NOT concerned about the Coronavirus. I am, however, looking forward to some empty planes and airports!
[ We usually allow comments on this blog, but the comments on this post have not generally been constructive, so they will be suspended.].
(1) Iuliano AD, Roguski KM, Chang HH, et al. Estimates of global seasonal influenza-associated respiratory mortality: a modelling study [published correction appears in Lancet. 2018 Jan 19;:]. Lancet. 2018;391(10127):1285–1300. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33293-2
(2) Faust J. COVID-19 Isn’t As Deadly As We Think. Slate. https://slate.com/technology/2020/03/coronavirus-mortality-rate-lower-than-we-think.html Accessed 3/6/20.
(3) Centers for Disease Control. The Flu Season. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/season/flu-season.htm Accessed 3/8/20
(4) Chen Z, Peto R, Zhou M, et al. Contrasting male and female trends in tobacco-attributed mortality in China: evidence from successive nationwide prospective cohort studies. Lancet. 2015;386(10002):1447–1456. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00340-2
(5) Centers for Disease Control. Weekly U.S. Influenza Surveillance Report https://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/index.htm Accessed 3/8/20
(6) Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention CCDC Weekly. The Epidemiological Characteristics of an Outbreak of 2019 Novel
Coronavirus Diseases (COVID-19) — China, 2020. Vol. 2. No. 8. http://weekly.chinacdc.cn/fileCCDCW/journal/article/ccdcw/2020/8/PDF/COVID-19.pdf
(7) Kolate G. Coronavirus Is Very Different From the Spanish Flu of 1918. Here’s How. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/09/science/coronavirus-is-very-different-from-the-spanish-flu-of-1918-heres-how.html Accessed 3/10/20
About the author: Chris Centeno, MD is a specialist in regenerative medicine and the new field of Interventional Orthopedics. Centeno pioneered orthopedic stem cell procedures in 2005 and is responsible for a large amount of the published research on stem cell use for orthopedic applications.
Read more at regenexx.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-03-13--Visual Clue as to Why Greenhouse Gas Effect is Bogus

Visual Clue as to Why Greenhouse Gas Effect is Bogus Above is a photo taken from the Microsoft Picture library of a scene in the San Juan National Forest in Colorado , USA .
What do you see ?
An early Spring scene with patches of snow covering hollow parts of the mountain in shade from the Sun .
We can discern the Sun is behind the mountains at a low angle to the ground surface and thus at lower intensity than say at noon , when it would reach its highest in the sky .
As a consequence of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ snow remains in the distant hollows .
This is because the Sun ’ s rays can not reach into the hollows to melt the snow .
However , there is clear sky above the scene so any Greenhouse Effect radiating down from the sky should have melted the snow ( and do so evenly ) according to the standard definition of the greenhouse gas theory which states that ‘ heat trapping/back radiation/delayed cooling ’ by the atmosphere should make the earth ’ s surface warmer than can be achieved by solar radiation alone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ IPCC diagram of the Greenhouse Effect from their 5th Assessment Report ‘ Summary for Policy Makers , Figure 2.11 ( above ) , it show that the atmosphere is claimed to possess twice the energy as that of the incoming Sun ’ s rays and thus more able to melt snow than the sun alone .
But the fact that there is snow in the hollows in the mountains demonstrates that there is no Greenhouse Effect .
The above is verifiable , observable evidence from Nature that ought to be persuasive even to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ heat or delaying cooling .
Direct sunlight has the power , all by itself , to melt the snow .
This simple proof should be sufficiently convincing to bring the majority of the public onside and stop the stupid waste of time , effort and money supposed to combat anthropogenic climate change .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The @ @ @

Visual Clue as to Why Greenhouse Gas Effect is Bogus
Written by Bevan Dockery & John O'Sullivan
Above is a photo taken from the Microsoft Picture library of a scene in the San Juan National Forest in Colorado, USA. What do you see?
An early Spring scene with patches of snow covering hollow parts of the mountain in shade from the Sun. We can discern the Sun is behind the mountains at a low angle to the ground surface and thus at lower intensity than say at noon, when it would reach its highest in the sky.
As a consequence of weak sunlight being partially blocked we see snow remains in the distant hollows. This is because the Sun’s rays cannot reach into the hollows to melt the snow.
However, there is clear sky above the scene so any Greenhouse Effect radiating down from the sky should have melted the snow (and do so evenly) according to the standard definition of the greenhouse gas theory which states that ‘heat trapping/back radiation/delayed cooling’ by the atmosphere should make the earth’s surface warmer than can be achieved by solar radiation alone.
If we look at the UN IPCC diagram of the Greenhouse Effect from their 5th Assessment Report ‘Summary for Policy Makers, Figure 2.11 (above), it show that the atmosphere is claimed to possess twice the energy as that of the incoming Sun’s rays and thus more able to melt snow than the sun alone.
But the fact that there is snow in the hollows in the mountains demonstrates that there is no Greenhouse Effect.
The above is verifiable, observable evidence from Nature that ought to be persuasive even to non-scientists that carbon dioxide is not trapping heat or delaying cooling.
Direct sunlight has the power, all by itself, to melt the snow.
This simple proof should be sufficiently convincing to bring the majority of the public onside and stop the stupid waste of time, effort and money supposed to combat anthropogenic climate change.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-03-13--Meteorologist: The Coronavirus Is Not A Climate Event

Meteorologist : The Coronavirus Is Not A Climate Event As predictable as the morning sunrise , we are hearing that the spread of the Coronavirus is enhanced by “ climate change.
” No proof of that for one , and secondly , it runs counter to the fact that life THRIVED in warmer times .
You have seen this chart many times so here it is again : They are called optimums because life thrives more when it ’ s warmer .
One may argue that a virus is a living organism , but the point is that in previous @ @ @ @ @ @ @ warmer , plant and animal life , which includes humans , thrived more .
Over the years , after studying all this , I have made no secret that I believe the climate change agenda is a smokescreen for other agendas .
One of them is driven by the idea that there are too many people on the planet , using too much of the resources of the planet .
This apparently flies in the face of the “ be fruitful and multiply , ” which of course does not say be stupid @ @ @ @ @ @ @ again does not imply that there is a set limit on what man can do with free will and a head turned toward a higher calling , something beyond the state .
But when I look at some of the statements by prominent people that are on the climate change bandwagon , I realize there is a link to population control .
And there is that word , control , the idea that one person knows better than another person what is good for the society as a whole .
Like it or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about equality for all but is a top-down form of government control where the vast majority of the people do not have a chance to rise into the upper echelon unless pledging loyalty to that doctrine .
In essence , the destruction of free will , which if you believe in God the way I do , runs counter to God ’ s gift of free will .
Basically it comes down to you can make the choice , vs someone else will make the choice for you But where is the evidence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ choice quotes will make my point How about this from none other than Ted Turner .
Quote by Ted Turner : “ A total population of 250-300 million people , a 95 % decline from present levels , would be ideal.
” Now here are some really nice ones : Quote by Paul Ehrlich , ( former ) professor , Stanford University : “ A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells ; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people .
We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cancer.
” Quote by John Holdren , President Obama ’ s science czar : “ There exists ample authority under which population growth could be regulated…It has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws , even including laws requiring compulsory abortion , could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.
” Quote by Christopher Manes , a writer for Earth First !
journal : “ The extinction of the human species may not only be inevitable but a good thing.
” How about these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Earth First !
: “ My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide , destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness , with its full complement of species , returning throughout the world.
” Quote by David Brower , a founder of the Sierra Club : “ Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society unless the parents hold a government license .
All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals , the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.
” Quote @ @ @ @ @ @ @ resultant ideal sustainable population is hence more than 500 million people but less than one billion.
” Quote by Susan Blakemore , a UK Guardian science journalist : “ For the planet ’ s sake , I hope we have bird flu or some other thing that will reduce the population because otherwise we ’ re doomed.
” A wish for the flu to reduce the population .
These are but a few choice ditties to make you aware that there is more than the increase of 1°C in the temperature of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ meets the eye .
An exhaustive list of quotes that will scare the daylights out of any rational ( keyword rational ) human being can be found here .
I will end with the challenge I always do for people who have open minds and hearts .
Don ’ t believe me , if it is important to go look for yourself .
Don ’ t believe what you are told .
If it is important to you , you must do the research and come to your conclusion .
That is what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ me , given the nature of what we are seeing today , there may come a time when what you can look at will be out of your control “ The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed — and hence clamorous to be led to safety — by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins , all of them imaginary .
… The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false face for the urge to rule it.
” Meteorologist Joe Bastardi is a pioneer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He is the author of “ The Climate Chronicles : Inconvenient Revelations You Won ’ t Hear From Al Gore ” ( Amazon ) .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Meteorologist: The Coronavirus Is Not A Climate Event
Written by Joe Bastardi
image source: shutterstock.com
As predictable as the morning sunrise, we are hearing that the spread of the Coronavirus is enhanced by “climate change.”
No proof of that for one, and secondly, it runs counter to the fact that life THRIVED in warmer times. You have seen this chart many times so here it is again:
They are called optimums because life thrives more when it’s warmer. One may argue that a virus is a living organism, but the point is that in previous times if viruses thrived when it was warmer, plant and animal life, which includes humans, thrived more.
Over the years, after studying all this, I have made no secret that I believe the climate change agenda is a smokescreen for other agendas.
One of them is driven by the idea that there are too many people on the planet, using too much of the resources of the planet.
This apparently flies in the face of the “be fruitful and multiply,” which of course does not say be stupid and trash the planet, but then again does not imply that there is a set limit on what man can do with free will and a head turned toward a higher calling, something beyond the state.
But when I look at some of the statements by prominent people that are on the climate change bandwagon, I realize there is a link to population control.
And there is that word, control, the idea that one person knows better than another person what is good for the society as a whole.
Like it or not, Socialism/Marxism is not at all about equality for all but is a top-down form of government control where the vast majority of the people do not have a chance to rise into the upper echelon unless pledging loyalty to that doctrine.
In essence, the destruction of free will, which if you believe in God the way I do, runs counter to God’s gift of free will.
Basically it comes down to you can make the choice, vs someone else will make the choice for you
But where is the evidence for this, I think a few choice quotes will make my point
How about this from none other than Ted Turner.
Quote by Ted Turner: “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”
Now here are some really nice ones:
Quote by Paul Ehrlich, (former) professor, Stanford University: “A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people. We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer.”
Quote by John Holdren, President Obama’s science czar: “There exists ample authority under which population growth could be regulated…It has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”
Quote by Christopher Manes, a writer for Earth First! journal: “The extinction of the human species may not only be inevitable but a good thing.”
How about these:
Quote by David Foreman, co-founder of Earth First!: “My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with its full complement of species, returning throughout the world.”
Quote by David Brower, a founder of the Sierra Club: “Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”
Quote by Club of Rome: “…the resultant ideal sustainable population is hence more than 500 million people but less than one billion.”
Quote by Susan Blakemore, a UK Guardian science journalist: “For the planet’s sake, I hope we have bird flu or some other thing that will reduce the population because otherwise we’re doomed.”
A wish for the flu to reduce the population.
These are but a few choice ditties to make you aware that there is more than the increase of 1°C in the temperature of the planet, for whatever reason, than meets the eye.
An exhaustive list of quotes that will scare the daylights out of any rational ( keyword rational) human being can be found here.
I will end with the challenge I always do for people who have open minds and hearts. Don’t believe me, if it is important to go look for yourself.
Don’t believe what you are told. If it is important to you, you must do the research and come to your conclusion.
That is what freedom is all about. And believe me, given the nature of what we are seeing today, there may come a time when what you can look at will be out of your control
Remember the words of HL Mencken:
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed — and hence clamorous to be led to safety — by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary. … The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false face for the urge to rule it.”
Meteorologist Joe Bastardi is a pioneer in extreme weather and long-range forecasting. He is the author of “The Climate Chronicles: Inconvenient Revelations You Won’t Hear From Al Gore” (Amazon).
Read more at CFACT
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-03-13--Pandemic Pandemonium Panic Poker

Pandemic Pandemonium Panic Poker

The sky is falling , Chicken Little said so .
And Foxy Loxy is licking his lips in anticipation .
COVID-19 virus is nearly everywhere , “ City Killer ” asteroids are whizzing by earth , apparently at increasing frequency and a few million miles closer day by day , the oceans are said to be rising by leaps and bounds , and the atmosphere supposedly is getting warmer every summer .
Surely , we are all going to drown ( in the oceans ) , or fry ( in hell ) , being “ blazared ” by a gigantic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ head by a big rock from outer space .
It probably does not matter which comes first , “ Hell or High Water.
” But there is even more mayhem in the world right now ; I call it : As you may have read , to make matters worse , the Big Boy ( BB ) , down there on that mid-eastern peninsula put the squeeze on oil prices .
Just to teach everyone a lesson .
He ’ s about to give away all his possessions to the energy-starved world populace @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bit of blowback coming from his harem and the thousands of others that depend on the rich income from selling their resource .
The former like to go shopping for expensive accoutrements from the courtiers on the Champs Elysee in Paris and the latter need to have their penchant for super-duper new cars , or new racing- dromedaries ( picture nearby ) , regularly satisfied .
I suspect , BB ’ s dream of having the world by the b… .
isn ’ t quite going to work out as planned .
There @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his ideas , from various sides .
So , IMHO , it will end as a failed bluff .
A “ Good Try , ” but destined to failure , nonetheless .
I ’ ll take my clues from nature .
Yes , even out there in the wilderness ( not far from “ civilization ” ) one can find similar bluffs .
One of the most interesting ones , in this neck of the woods , is the Actually , its correct name is “ Puff Adder ” ( not “ Bluff @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( d ) snake .
It is quite rare and hardly ever seen .
Over the last 50 years , I ’ ve come across one only four times , never for long .
I think “ Bluff … ” would be a better name for it than “ Puff… ” .
The picture below may show you why .
Surely , that ’ s a vicious-looking beast , ready to attack with its large head and eyes .
And , if you aren ’ t frightened enough yet , it will puff @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ ve ever heard before – better take flight in a hurry !
In reality , this snake , rarely reaching 3 ft. in length , is one of this continent ’ s best bluff artists .
Just look at the photo again : What , at first glance , seems to be the snout , in fact is the entire head .
The poor critter , shown in the pic , I spotted on the ground of a small pine tree grove while on a leisurely fall hike with friends .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I ever saw were close to some brush and disappeared out of sight in the blink of an eye .
Not so this one – it had no place to quickly escape to .
Of course , I couldn ’ t let this opportunity slip by without having some fun .
Using my walking stick , I punched it into the ground a foot in front of it .
Without an obvious way to escape this danger , it slowly went into “ attack mode ” by splaying its upper body into this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like a pig.
” Admittedly , I began to wonder who was more surprised and afraid of the other .
But it was all bluff – from each of us — and without further ado , we all went happily on our way to more adventures .
So , what ’ s the gist of the story ?
Don ’ t panic or get suckered !
– There ’ s rarely more than one winner in a game of poker !

Pandemic Pandemonium Panic Poker
Written by Dr Klaus L E Kaiser
The sky is falling, Chicken Little said so. And Foxy Loxy is licking his lips in anticipation.
COVID-19 virus is nearly everywhere, “City Killer” asteroids are whizzing by earth, apparently at increasing frequency and a few million miles closer day by day, the oceans are said to be rising by leaps and bounds, and the atmosphere supposedly is getting warmer every summer.
Surely, we are all going to drown (in the oceans), or fry (in hell), being “blazared” by a gigantic black hole, or hit on the head by a big rock from outer space.
It probably does not matter which comes first, “Hell or High Water.” But there is even more mayhem in the world right now; I call it:
The Big Boy Syndrome
As you may have read, to make matters worse, the Big Boy (BB), down there on that mid-eastern peninsula put the squeeze on oil prices. Just to teach everyone a lesson. He’s about to give away all his possessions to the energy-starved world populace. Well, he may get a bit of blowback coming from his harem and the thousands of others that depend on the rich income from selling their resource.
The former like to go shopping for expensive accoutrements from the courtiers on the Champs Elysee in Paris and the latter need to have their penchant for super-duper new cars, or new racing- dromedaries ( picture nearby), regularly satisfied.
I suspect, BB’s dream of having the world by the b…. isn’t quite going to work out as planned. There are many forces that take umbrage against his ideas, from various sides. So, IMHO, it will end as a failed bluff. A “Good Try,” but destined to failure, nonetheless.
I’ll take my clues from nature. Yes, even out there in the wilderness (not far from “civilization”) one can find similar bluffs. One of the most interesting ones, in this neck of the woods, is the
Bluff Adder
Actually, its correct name is “Puff Adder” (not “Bluff”), also known as hognose(d) snake. It is quite rare and hardly ever seen. Over the last 50 years, I’ve come across one only four times, never for long. I think “Bluff …” would be a better name for it than “Puff…”. The picture below may show you why.
Surely, that’s a vicious-looking beast, ready to attack with its large head and eyes. And, if you aren’t frightened enough yet, it will puff, burp and groan like nothing you’ve ever heard before – better take flight in a hurry!
It’s all a Bluff
In reality, this snake, rarely reaching 3 ft. in length, is one of this continent’s best bluff artists. Just look at the photo again: What, at first glance, seems to be the snout, in fact is the entire head.
The poor critter, shown in the pic, I spotted on the ground of a small pine tree grove while on a leisurely fall hike with friends. The other few specimens of the kind that I ever saw were close to some brush and disappeared out of sight in the blink of an eye. Not so this one – it had no place to quickly escape to.
Of course, I couldn’t let this opportunity slip by without having some fun. Using my walking stick, I punched it into the ground a foot in front of it. Without an obvious way to escape this danger, it slowly went into “attack mode” by splaying its upper body into this cobra-like display and starting to “groan like a pig.” Admittedly, I began to wonder who was more surprised and afraid of the other.
But it was all bluff – from each of us — and without further ado, we all went happily on our way to more adventures.
So, what’s the gist of the story?
Don’t panic or get suckered! – There’s rarely more than one winner in a game of poker!
Dr. Klaus L.E. Kaiser is author of CONVENIENT MYTHS, the green revolution – perceptions, politics, and facts Convenient Myths
****
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print