principiascientificinternational--2020-08-14--COVID-19 Vaccine Objectors May Lose Jobs, Face Jail Time, Says ‘Expert’

A bioethics “ expert ” is stating that it is perfectly legal and constitutional for states to fine , imprison , or deny employment to individuals who refuse to take the COVID-19 vaccine .
“ States can compel vaccinations in more or less intrusive ways , ” says Dov Fox , a Soros fellow who serves as the director of the Center for Health Law Policy and Bioethics at the University of San Diego .
“ They can limit access to schools or services or jobs if people don ’ t get vaccinated .
They could force them to pay @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in jail.
” Fox cites the case of Jacobson v. Massachusetts ( 1905 ) , in which the robed lawyers on the bench decided that Massachusetts could fine individuals who refused smallpox inoculations .
This has been exploited by bureaucrats to force children who are not vaccinated out of public schools .
“ Courts have found that when medical necessity requires it , the public health outweighs the individual rights and liberties at stake , ” Fox says .
Fox notes that enacting vaccine mandates at the state level could have significant blowback @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against restrictive quarantine policies .
Just because these measures are legal does not mean they should necessarily be enacted , Fox argues .
He also makes the point that religious exemptions would not be necessary for vaccine mandates , as religious liberty is essentially no more .
“ Religious exemptions are not constitutionally required by the First Amendment ’ s Free Exercise clause , provided that the vaccine mandates don ’ t single out religion ; they ’ re not motivated by a desire to interfere with it , ” Fox says .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to enact the vaccine mandates for them to be legally binding , as a federal mandate would likely be ruled unconstitutional .
The 2012 decision on the Affordable Care Act by SCOTUS made it clear that the feds can not lawfully compel the states into adopting such a scheme against their will , even if it were perpetrated under the guise of public safety .
Big League Politics has reported on the frenzied push for mass vaccinations while the public is still in the grips of COVID-19 mass hysteria , which has resulted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” pharmaceutical power-grab : President Donald Trump has launched “ Operation Warp Speed ” to funnel resources toward Big Pharma for the purposes of creating a vaccine shot that will be ready for mass distribution throughout the country by the end of the year .
The White House is calling this a Manhattan Project-style project that aims to get vaccines into as many people as quickly as possible , in a move that must have technocratic oligarch Bill Gates grinning ear-to-ear .
“ Operation Warp Speed is clearly another extension of President Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accept ‘ business as usual ’ approaches to addressing the COVID-19 crisis , ” said Michael Caputo , who works as assistant secretary for public affairs at the Department of Health and Human Services .
The project is expected to cost the U.S. taxpayer billions of dollars , with much of that money going into the coffers of Big Pharma , and they hope to have 100 million doses ready by the end of the year .
It is unclear if these vaccines would even improve the public health , as the government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ influenza vaccines are only effective 40 percent of the time .
The Trump administration is working along with disgraced globalist organizations like the World Health Organization ( WHO ) in using the coronavirus pandemic for a vaccine push .
“ We are scientists , physicians , funders and manufacturers who have come together as part of an international collaboration , coordinated by the World Health Organization ( WHO ) , to help speed the availability of a vaccine against COVID-19 , ” dozens of so-called experts declared in a WHO press release .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ takes time to develop , a vaccine may ultimately be instrumental in controlling this worldwide pandemic… We will continue efforts to strengthen the unprecedented worldwide collaboration , cooperation and sharing of data already underway .
We believe these efforts will help reduce inefficiencies and duplication of effort , and we will work tenaciously to increase the likelihood that one or more safe and effective vaccines will soon be made available to all , ” they added .
Vaccine skeptics are seeing their worst nightmare come to fruition , as the right crisis has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ destroy the freedom to choose .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

COVID-19 Vaccine Objectors May Lose Jobs, Face Jail Time, Says ‘Expert’
Written by Shane Trejo
A bioethics “expert” is stating that it is perfectly legal and constitutional for states to fine, imprison, or deny employment to individuals who refuse to take the COVID-19 vaccine.
“States can compel vaccinations in more or less intrusive ways,” says Dov Fox, a Soros fellow who serves as the director of the Center for Health Law Policy and Bioethics at the University of San Diego. “They can limit access to schools or services or jobs if people don’t get vaccinated. They could force them to pay a fine or even lock them up in jail.”
Fox cites the case of Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905), in which the robed lawyers on the bench decided that Massachusetts could fine individuals who refused smallpox inoculations. This has been exploited by bureaucrats to force children who are not vaccinated out of public schools.
“Courts have found that when medical necessity requires it, the public health outweighs the individual rights and liberties at stake,” Fox says.
Fox notes that enacting vaccine mandates at the state level could have significant blowback, with large protests already being waged against restrictive quarantine policies. Just because these measures are legal does not mean they should necessarily be enacted, Fox argues.
He also makes the point that religious exemptions would not be necessary for vaccine mandates, as religious liberty is essentially no more.
“Religious exemptions are not constitutionally required by the First Amendment’s Free Exercise clause, provided that the vaccine mandates don’t single out religion; they’re not motivated by a desire to interfere with it,” Fox says.
Fox believes that the states would need to enact the vaccine mandates for them to be legally binding, as a federal mandate would likely be ruled unconstitutional. The 2012 decision on the Affordable Care Act by SCOTUS made it clear that the feds cannot lawfully compel the states into adopting such a scheme against their will, even if it were perpetrated under the guise of public safety.
Big League Politics has reported on the frenzied push for mass vaccinations while the public is still in the grips of COVID-19 mass hysteria, which has resulted in the federal “Operation Warp Speed” pharmaceutical power-grab:
President Donald Trump has launched “Operation Warp Speed” to funnel resources toward Big Pharma for the purposes of creating a vaccine shot that will be ready for mass distribution throughout the country by the end of the year. The White House is calling this a Manhattan Project-style project that aims to get vaccines into as many people as quickly as possible, in a move that must have technocratic oligarch Bill Gates grinning ear-to-ear. “Operation Warp Speed is clearly another extension of President Trump’s bold leadership and unwillingness to accept ‘business as usual’ approaches to addressing the COVID-19 crisis,” said Michael Caputo, who works as assistant secretary for public affairs at the Department of Health and Human Services. The project is expected to cost the U.S. taxpayer billions of dollars, with much of that money going into the coffers of Big Pharma, and they hope to have 100 million doses ready by the end of the year. It is unclear if these vaccines would even improve the public health, as the government’s own data shows that regular influenza vaccines are only effective 40 percent of the time. The Trump administration is working along with disgraced globalist organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) in using the coronavirus pandemic for a vaccine push. “We are scientists, physicians, funders and manufacturers who have come together as part of an international collaboration, coordinated by the World Health Organization (WHO), to help speed the availability of a vaccine against COVID-19,” dozens of so-called experts declared in a WHO press release. “While a vaccine for general use takes time to develop, a vaccine may ultimately be instrumental in controlling this worldwide pandemic… We will continue efforts to strengthen the unprecedented worldwide collaboration, cooperation and sharing of data already underway. We believe these efforts will help reduce inefficiencies and duplication of effort, and we will work tenaciously to increase the likelihood that one or more safe and effective vaccines will soon be made available to all,” they added.
Vaccine skeptics are seeing their worst nightmare come to fruition, as the right crisis has arrived to usher in coercive mandates and destroy the freedom to choose.
Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-17--Study: ‘No Change’ In Global Temperatures for 100 Years

In the early 1900s , the globally-averaged distribution of calculated surface temperature estimates ranged between 14°C ( 57.2F ) and @ @ @ @ @ For 1991-2018 , HadCRUT , Berkeley , and NASA GISS also estimate today ’ s @ @ @ @ @ ( 58.1°F ) .
Scientists estimating Earth ’ s surface temperature has been an ongoing @ @ @ @ @ century .
A new study ( Kramm et al.
, 2020 ) suggests the generally @ @ @ @ @ to 1913 from dozens of calculated results was about 14.4°C ( 57.9°F ) .
Problematically @ @ @ @ @ and NASA GISS also indicate 1991-2018 had a global surface temperature of about 14.5°C ( @ @ @ @ @ suggest there has been “ no change in the globally averaged near-surface temperature over the @ @ @ @ @

Study: ‘No Change’ In Global Temperatures for 100 Years
Written by Kenneth Richard
In the early 1900s, the globally-averaged distribution of calculated surface temperature estimates ranged between 14°C (57.2F) and 15°C (59F). For 1991-2018, HadCRUT, Berkeley, and NASA GISS also estimate today’s global temperature is about 14.5°C (58.1°F).
Scientists estimating Earth’s surface temperature has been an ongoing pursuit since the early 19th century.
A new study (Kramm et al., 2020) suggests the generally agreed-upon global temperature from 1877 to 1913 from dozens of calculated results was about 14.4°C (57.9°F).
Problematically, HadCRUT, Berkley, and NASA GISS also indicate 1991-2018 had a global surface temperature of about 14.5°C (58.1°F).
This would suggest there has been “no change in the globally averaged near-surface temperature over the past 100 years.”
Read more at No Tricks Zone **** PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-17--Dr. Max Gerson: A cancer cure that cost his life

A question I often ask myself is “ could it be possible that a natural cure for cancer would be suppressed because it offered no financial gain for several big pharma and private medical entities ?
” “ Could greed be more powerful than respect for human life ?
” I think history has taught us that , in fact , greed and power can combat all moral obligations and result in mass genocide , war , starvation and more .
Could the same be true for the medical industries in the U.S. ?
Are real cures and natural treatments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t be patented and profitable ?
I know I ’ m not the only one that has wondered about this as more and more light is shed upon the powerful healing properties of organic fruits , vegetables , and superfoods .
Especially when the western medical community still refuses to even entertain the idea that diseases like cancer can be completely cured with diet instead of treated with dangerous drugs and surgery .
Instead of a war against cancer there seems to be a war against the un-patentable cure for cancer & @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of view seems nothing less than incriminating towards an industry that has many positive attributes , however there seems to be a elephant in the room that this same industry wants to ignore .
Instead of a war against cancer there seems to be a war against the un-patentable cure for cancer & chronic diseases .
That elephant is a plant based approach to cure cancer & other chronic diseases WITHOUT the need to keep individuals on daily medications for the rest of their lives .
Medications that in the U.S. & reported @ @ @ @ @ @ @ per year .
That ’ s the number based on proven properly prescribed and taken medications .
That ’ s not including overdoses , abuse , medication errors etc .
Considering the 3 leading causes of death/year in the U.S. are : I think we can assume that more can be done for these very treatable conditions .
Why not implement extreme dietary reconstruction within hospitals to treat people naturally and teach them how to heal themselves long term ?
To stop treating the isolated symptoms and start treating the systemic cause .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ start treating the systemic cause.
” It seems like common sense considering the immense scientific literature and research , like The China Study , that has shed so much positive light on the healing properties of a whole food plant based organic diet .
To this day medical students receive an average of only 23.9 contact hours of nutritional study .
So why haven ’ t we made this major change/shift in the way that we approach healing in hospitals and medical school ?
To put so little emphasis on diet ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Especially when the immense scientific evidence has existed for no less than 70 years .
To this day medical students receive an average of only 23.9 contact hours of nutritional study .
I think the answer lays in the past when one of , if not , the greatest hopes of a cure for cancer and diseases emerged in 1946 by the genius of Dr. Max Gerson .
“ …I see in him one of the most eminent geniuses in the history of medicine .
Many of his basic ideas have been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them .
Yet , he has achieved more than seemed possible under adverse conditions .
He leaves a legacy which commands attention and which will assure him his due place .
Those whom he has cured will now attest to the truth of his ideas.
” – Albert Schweitzer M.D .
( Nobel Prize Winner ) Max was born in Eastern Germany on Oct 18th , 1881 .
As a young boy he began to take a deep interest in the soil and how it affected food and the organisms dwelling there .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the negative effects they had .
He realized that the soil was connected to our health and that it must be properly taken care of and not poisoned .
His interest in health and the body led him to become a doctor .
He received his license as a M.D .
in May of 1907 at the University of Freiburg , Berlin .
He realized that the soil was connected to our health and that it must be properly taken care of and not poisoned .
As a student in medical school Max @ @ @ @ @ @ @ condition became so debilitating that he sought advice for treatment from his professors and other medical doctors .
Unable to obtain any relief , he began to experiment on himself and form his own treatment .
After 2 years of an elimination diet he finally was able to completely halt his migraines through a specialized diet of fruits and vegetables with no fat , salt , alcohol or spices .
In 1918 his “ migraine diet ” became somewhat well known and widely used by his patients and others .
Then , as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ returned to Dr. Gerson and reported an observation that not only did the “ migraine diet ” cure his migraines , but his skin tuberculosis was also cured .
This was a miraculous report considering tuberculosis was incurable at the time .
The news of this miracle spread quickly throughout the medical community .
In 1924 Dr. Max Gerson was invited by the famous lung specialist Dr. Ferdinand Sauerbruch to do a clinical trial on 450 incurable skin tuberculosis patients using the Gerson diet as treatment .
Dr. Sauerbruch told Dr. Gerson that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would believe every word of Gerson ’ s treatment .
446 of the 450 patients completely recovered resulting in over a 99 % recovery rate .
Dr. Sauerbruch and Dr. Gerson simultaneously published articles in a dozen of the world ’ s leading medical journals , establishing the Gerson diet as the first cure for skin tuberculosis .
446 of the 450 patients completely recovered resulting in over a 99 % recovery rate At this time , Dr. Gerson attracted the friendship of Nobel Prize winner Albert Schweitzer , M.D.
, by curing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ after all conventional treatments had failed .
Gerson and Schweitzer remained friends for life , and maintained regular correspondence .
Dr. Schweitzer followed Gerson ’ s progress as the dietary therapy was successfully applied to heart disease , kidney failure , and finally – cancer .
Schweitzer ’ s own type II diabetes was cured by treatment with Gerson ’ s therapy .
When Nazi Germany threatened the Jewish population , Max was the only one of his 7 siblings to escape alive .
He left Germany in 1933 and ended up in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his medical practice in New York where he remained & cured many patients of cancer and other diseases until his mysterious death by arsenic poisoning induced pneumonia in 1959 .
The Gerson dietary regimen consists of a low salt , low fat , and high carbohydrate diet plus oral administration of minerals and vitamins to supplement those vitamins missing in the diet .
The diet is chiefly made of large amounts of organic fresh fruit and vegetable juices and does not allow any meat , milk , alcohol , canned or bottled foods @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The diet burns down to an alkaline ash and in general is a combination of many well known and approved dietary nutritional discoveries by many other workers .
The therapy also includes a liver detoxification procedure via coffee enemas .
Max assumed that the closer one ’ s diet is to nature and the soil with fresh fruit from the trees and fresh vegetables directly from the garden , the ‘ nearer one is to normal health .
This new approach to the cancer problem is of fundamental importance because it is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a systemic disease , that is , a disease of abnormal chemistry of the whole body .
Heretofore , all efforts to treat cancer have been based upon the theory that eradication of the cancer growth must be performed by surgery , X-ray , or radium without regard for abnormal body chemistry which permits the growth to occur .
The reason that surgery , X-ray , and radium have not been a real success in the treatment of cancer is that cancer is primarily a disease of abnormal body chemistry , chemistry @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the site of the cancer .
The Gerson dietary regimen is an encouraging attempt to return such abnormal body chemistry to normal .
In 1946 ALL current and past government issued research dollars had only been spent on three avenues of cancer treatment in the United States : Radium , Surgery , and X-ray .
In 1946 , Gerson demonstrated recovered patients before the Pepper-Neely Congressional Subcommittee , during hearings on a bill to fund research into cancer treatment .
Although only a few peer-reviewed journals were receptive to Gerson ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could affect health , he continued to publish articles on his therapy and case histories of healed patients .
During this hearing Gerson was able to demonstrate a remarkable case history of cancer patients that had complete tumor regression/cure using his therapy after traditional western treatments had failed .
Many of the patients had been sent home “ to die ” after their doctors told them that nothing more could be done .
Many , if not most , of Gerson ’ s patients were “ hopeless cases ” after failed conventional western @ @ @ @ @ @ @ last ditch effort to hold onto their lives .
These are Gerson ’ s own words from his statement given to the Pepper-Neely Congressional Subcommittee : “ The dietetic treatment which has been known as the “ Gerson diet , ” was developed first to relieve my own severe migraine condition .
Then it was successfully applied to patients with allergic conditions such as asthma as well as diseases of the intestinal tract and the liver pancreas apparatus .
By chance , a patient with lupus vulgaris ( skin tuberculosis ) was cured @ @ @ @ @ @ @ After this success the dietetic treatment was used in all other kinds of tuberculosis-bones , kidneys , eyes , lungs- and so forth .
It , too , was highly favorable in many other chronic diseases such as arthritis , heart diseases , chronic sinusitis , chronic ulcers , including colitis , high blood pressure , psoriasis , sclerosis multiplex , and so forth .
The most striking results were seen in the restoration of various kinds of liver and gall bladder diseases which could not be influenced by other methods up to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chronic diseases which responded to the dietetic treatment showed clearly that the human body lost part of its resistance and healing power , as he left the way of natural nutrition for generations .
The fundamental damage starts with the use of artificial fertilizer for vegetables and fruits as well as for fodder .
Thus the chemically transformed vegetarian and meat nourishment , increasing through generations , transforms the organs and functions of the human body in the wrong direction .
Another basic defect lies in the waste of excrement ’ s of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ natural manure to the fruit-bearing soil , it is led into the rivers , killing underwater life .
The natural cycle is interrupted and mankind has to suffer dearly for the violation .
Life in forest and wilderness should teach us this lesson .
But we can regain the lost defense and healing power if we return as close as possible to the laws of nature as they are created .
Highly concentrated for speedy reaction , they are laid down in this dietetic treatment.
” The cases that Dr. Gerson presented at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ABC news broadcaster Raymond Gram Swing , present at the testimony , went on his national radio broadcast that night and announced to the entire nation that a cure for cancer had been discovered .
The public response to this broadcast was staggering as people called into ABC to ask about this hopeful treatment .
Two weeks later Raymond was fired after more than 30 years of employment with ABC .
Unfortunately the dark forces of medicine were also listening and from that point on Dr. Gerson became a marked and censured man @ @ @ @ @ @ @ # 8947 of the United States archives ) was defeated by four senators who were medical doctors .
Over the next 13 years , Dr. Gerson would lose his membership privileges to the New York State Medical Society , be prohibited from publishing his work in peer-reviewed medical journals and , ultimately , murdered by a likely medical and pharmaceutical industry more interested in preserving vast pharmaceutical profits then curing a dying and suffering humanity .
He was tested positive for arsenic poisoning right before his death in 1959 .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Dr. Max Gerson: A cancer cure that cost his life
Written by Lisa Hunt
A question I often ask myself is “could it be possible that a natural cure for cancer would be suppressed because it offered no financial gain for several big pharma and private medical entities?” “Could greed be more powerful than respect for human life?”
I think history has taught us that, in fact, greed and power can combat all moral obligations and result in mass genocide, war, starvation and more. Could the same be true for the medical industries in the U.S.? Are real cures and natural treatments for cancer being suppressed because they can’t be patented and profitable?
I know I’m not the only one that has wondered about this as more and more light is shed upon the powerful healing properties of organic fruits, vegetables, and superfoods. Especially when the western medical community still refuses to even entertain the idea that diseases like cancer can be completely cured with diet instead of treated with dangerous drugs and surgery.
Instead of a war against cancer there seems to be a war against the un-patentable cure for cancer & chronic diseases. I know my point of view seems nothing less than incriminating towards an industry that has many positive attributes, however there seems to be a elephant in the room that this same industry wants to ignore.
Instead of a war against cancer there seems to be a war against the un-patentable cure for cancer & chronic diseases.
That elephant is a plant based approach to cure cancer & other chronic diseases WITHOUT the need to keep individuals on daily medications for the rest of their lives. Medications that in the U.S. & reported by JAMA result in 106,000 verified deaths per year. That’s the number based on proven properly prescribed and taken medications. That’s not including overdoses, abuse, medication errors etc.
Considering the 3 leading causes of death/year in the U.S. are:
1. heart disease (710K)
2. cancer (553k)
3. medical care (225k)
I think we can assume that more can be done for these very treatable conditions. Why not implement extreme dietary reconstruction within hospitals to treat people naturally and teach them how to heal themselves long term? To stop treating the isolated symptoms and start treating the systemic cause.
“stop treating the isolated symptoms and start treating the systemic cause.”
It seems like common sense considering the immense scientific literature and research, like The China Study, that has shed so much positive light on the healing properties of a whole food plant based organic diet.
To this day medical students receive an average of only 23.9 contact hours of nutritional study. So why haven’t we made this major change/shift in the way that we approach healing in hospitals and medical school? To put so little emphasis on diet’s correlation with disease is impossible to understand. Especially when the immense scientific evidence has existed for no less than 70 years.
To this day medical students receive an average of only 23.9 contact hours of nutritional study.
I think the answer lays in the past when one of, if not, the greatest hopes of a cure for cancer and diseases emerged in 1946 by the genius of Dr. Max Gerson.
Who was Max Gerson?
“…I see in him one of the most eminent geniuses in the history of medicine. Many of his basic ideas have been adopted without having his name connected with them. Yet, he has achieved more than seemed possible under adverse conditions. He leaves a legacy which commands attention and which will assure him his due place. Those whom he has cured will now attest to the truth of his ideas.” – Albert Schweitzer M.D. (Nobel Prize Winner)
Max was born in Eastern Germany on Oct 18th, 1881. As a young boy he began to take a deep interest in the soil and how it affected food and the organisms dwelling there. Especially when chemical fertilizers were added and the negative effects they had.
He realized that the soil was connected to our health and that it must be properly taken care of and not poisoned. His interest in health and the body led him to become a doctor. He received his license as a M.D. in May of 1907 at the University of Freiburg, Berlin.
He realized that the soil was connected to our health and that it must be properly taken care of and not poisoned.
As a student in medical school Max struggled with persistent chronic migraines. His condition became so debilitating that he sought advice for treatment from his professors and other medical doctors. Unable to obtain any relief, he began to experiment on himself and form his own treatment. After 2 years of an elimination diet he finally was able to completely halt his migraines through a specialized diet of fruits and vegetables with no fat, salt, alcohol or spices.
In 1918 his “migraine diet” became somewhat well known and widely used by his patients and others. Then, as fate would have it, a patient returned to Dr. Gerson and reported an observation that not only did the “migraine diet” cure his migraines, but his skin tuberculosis was also cured. This was a miraculous report considering tuberculosis was incurable at the time. The news of this miracle spread quickly throughout the medical community.
In 1924 Dr. Max Gerson was invited by the famous lung specialist Dr. Ferdinand Sauerbruch to do a clinical trial on 450 incurable skin tuberculosis patients using the Gerson diet as treatment. Dr. Sauerbruch told Dr. Gerson that even if one patient showed improvement he would believe every word of Gerson’s treatment. 446 of the 450 patients completely recovered resulting in over a 99% recovery rate. Dr. Sauerbruch and Dr. Gerson simultaneously published articles in a dozen of the world’s leading medical journals, establishing the Gerson diet as the first cure for skin tuberculosis.
446 of the 450 patients completely recovered resulting in over a 99% recovery rate
At this time, Dr. Gerson attracted the friendship of Nobel Prize winner Albert Schweitzer, M.D., by curing Schweitzer’s wife of lung tuberculosis after all conventional treatments had failed. Gerson and Schweitzer remained friends for life, and maintained regular correspondence. Dr. Schweitzer followed Gerson’s progress as the dietary therapy was successfully applied to heart disease, kidney failure, and finally – cancer. Schweitzer’s own type II diabetes was cured by treatment with Gerson’s therapy.
When Nazi Germany threatened the Jewish population, Max was the only one of his 7 siblings to escape alive. He left Germany in 1933 and ended up in the United States in 1936 to start his medical practice in New York where he remained & cured many patients of cancer and other diseases until his mysterious death by arsenic poisoning induced pneumonia in 1959.
The Gerson Diet.
The Gerson dietary regimen consists of a low salt, low fat, and high carbohydrate diet plus oral administration of minerals and vitamins to supplement those vitamins missing in the diet. The diet is chiefly made of large amounts of organic fresh fruit and vegetable juices and does not allow any meat, milk, alcohol, canned or bottled foods. Tobacco in any form is prohibited.
The diet burns down to an alkaline ash and in general is a combination of many well known and approved dietary nutritional discoveries by many other workers. The therapy also includes a liver detoxification procedure via coffee enemas.
Max assumed that the closer one’s diet is to nature and the soil with fresh fruit from the trees and fresh vegetables directly from the garden, the ‘nearer one is to normal health.
This new approach to the cancer problem is of fundamental importance because it is the first promising method which treats cancer as a systemic disease, that is, a disease of abnormal chemistry of the whole body.
Heretofore, all efforts to treat cancer have been based upon the theory that eradication of the cancer growth must be performed by surgery, X-ray, or radium without regard for abnormal body chemistry which permits the growth to occur. The reason that surgery, X-ray, and radium have not been a real success in the treatment of cancer is that cancer is primarily a disease of abnormal body chemistry, chemistry which is controlled by organs far distant from the site of the cancer.
The Gerson dietary regimen is an encouraging attempt to return such abnormal body chemistry to normal.
Max Gerson vs Big Pharma.
In 1946 ALL current and past government issued research dollars had only been spent on three avenues of cancer treatment in the United States: Radium, Surgery, and X-ray.
In 1946, Gerson demonstrated recovered patients before the Pepper-Neely Congressional Subcommittee, during hearings on a bill to fund research into cancer treatment. Although only a few peer-reviewed journals were receptive to Gerson’s then “radical” idea that diet could affect health, he continued to publish articles on his therapy and case histories of healed patients.
During this hearing Gerson was able to demonstrate a remarkable case history of cancer patients that had complete tumor regression/cure using his therapy after traditional western treatments had failed. Many of the patients had been sent home “to die” after their doctors told them that nothing more could be done. Many, if not most, of Gerson’s patients were “hopeless cases” after failed conventional western treatment and came to him as a last ditch effort to hold onto their lives.
These are Gerson’s own words from his statement given to the Pepper-Neely Congressional Subcommittee:
“The dietetic treatment which has been known as the “Gerson diet,” was developed first to relieve my own severe migraine condition. Then it was successfully applied to patients with allergic conditions such as asthma as well as diseases of the intestinal tract and the liver pancreas apparatus.
By chance, a patient with lupus vulgaris (skin tuberculosis) was cured following the use of the diet. After this success the dietetic treatment was used in all other kinds of tuberculosis-bones, kidneys, eyes, lungs- and so forth.
It, too, was highly favorable in many other chronic diseases such as arthritis, heart diseases, chronic sinusitis, chronic ulcers, including colitis, high blood pressure, psoriasis, sclerosis multiplex, and so forth.
The most striking results were seen in the restoration of various kinds of liver and gall bladder diseases which could not be influenced by other methods up to the present.
The great number of chronic diseases which responded to the dietetic treatment showed clearly that the human body lost part of its resistance and healing power, as he left the way of natural nutrition for generations.
The fundamental damage starts with the use of artificial fertilizer for vegetables and fruits as well as for fodder. Thus the chemically transformed vegetarian and meat nourishment, increasing through generations, transforms the organs and functions of the human body in the wrong direction.
Another basic defect lies in the waste of excrement’s of the cities. Instead of returning the natural manure to the fruit-bearing soil, it is led into the rivers, killing underwater life. The natural cycle is interrupted and mankind has to suffer dearly for the violation.
Life in forest and wilderness should teach us this lesson. But we can regain the lost defense and healing power if we return as close as possible to the laws of nature as they are created.
Highly concentrated for speedy reaction, they are laid down in this dietetic treatment.”
The cases that Dr. Gerson presented at the hearing were so compelling that renowned ABC news broadcaster Raymond Gram Swing, present at the testimony, went on his national radio broadcast that night and announced to the entire nation that a cure for cancer had been discovered. The public response to this broadcast was staggering as people called into ABC to ask about this hopeful treatment. Two weeks later Raymond was fired after more than 30 years of employment with ABC.
Unfortunately the dark forces of medicine were also listening and from that point on Dr. Gerson became a marked and censured man and the Pepper-Neely Anticancer Bill (document # 8947 of the United States archives) was defeated by four senators who were medical doctors.
Over the next 13 years, Dr. Gerson would lose his membership privileges to the New York State Medical Society, be prohibited from publishing his work in peer-reviewed medical journals and, ultimately, murdered by a likely medical and pharmaceutical industry more interested in preserving vast pharmaceutical profits then curing a dying and suffering humanity.
He was tested positive for arsenic poisoning right before his death in 1959.
Read more at powerootz.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-17--Watch Livestream: ‘PLANDEMIC – INDOCTORNATION’ 18th August

On August 18 2020 at 5pm UK time/12 noon EST , the Digital Freedom Platform by London Real is proud to be exclusively livestreaming what might be the most important documentary you will ever see : PLANDEMIC – INDOCTORNATION .
Created by the team behind the game-changing Plandemic video segment from Mikki Willis featuring Dr. Judy Mikovits that went viral and was banned on every major social media platform for exposing the truth about Covid-19 , this new FEATURE LENGTH PIECE promises to be the most revelatory film on what is driving the vaccine agenda , the various roles of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Adhanom , Anthony Fauci and more .
Going deep into what is really happening with mainstream media , Silicon Valley tech giants , big pharma and our health protection agencies , Mikki ’ s new film finally connects the dots… … And we are excited to be able to share this with you… We believe that this film will fundamentally shift the discourse around Coronavirus , the lockdown and the vested interests involved ; register now for updates and to watch the movie on Tuesday .
Sign up/visit the link to the broadcast @ @ @ @ @ @ @ legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Watch Livestream: ‘PLANDEMIC – INDOCTORNATION’ 18th August
Written by London Real
On August 18 2020 at 5pm UK time/12 noon EST, the Digital Freedom Platform by London Real is proud to be exclusively livestreaming what might be the most important documentary you will ever see: PLANDEMIC – INDOCTORNATION.
Created by the team behind the game-changing Plandemic video segment from Mikki Willis featuring Dr. Judy Mikovits that went viral and was banned on every major social media platform for exposing the truth about Covid-19, this new FEATURE LENGTH PIECE promises to be the most revelatory film on what is driving the vaccine agenda, the various roles of the WHO, Bill Gates, Tedros Adhanom, Anthony Fauci and more.
Going deep into what is really happening with mainstream media, Silicon Valley tech giants, big pharma and our health protection agencies, Mikki’s new film finally connects the dots…
… And we are excited to be able to share this with you…
We believe that this film will fundamentally shift the discourse around Coronavirus, the lockdown and the vested interests involved; register now for updates and to watch the movie on Tuesday.
Sign up/visit the link to the broadcast site at freedomplatform.tv
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-17--Scientists: COVID-19 Immunity Seen In Even the Mildly Infected

In discussions about immune responses to the coronavirus , much of the conversation has focused on antibodies — Y-shaped proteins @ @ @ @ @ surfaces of pathogens and block them from infecting cells .
But antibodies represent just one @ @ @ @ @ coordinated squadron of immune soldiers , each with its own unique modes of attack .
@ @ @ @ @ cells , for instance , are cloaked from antibodies , but are still vulnerable to @ @ @ @ @ force infected cells to self-destruct .
Another set of T cells , nicknamed “ helpers @ @ @ @ @ cells to mature into antibody-making machines .

In discussions about immune responses to the coronavirus, much of the conversation has focused on antibodies — Y-shaped proteins that can latch onto the surfaces of pathogens and block them from infecting cells. But antibodies represent just one wing of a complex and coordinated squadron of immune soldiers, each with its own unique modes of attack.
Viruses that have already invaded cells, for instance, are cloaked from antibodies, but are still vulnerable to killer T cells, which force infected cells to self-destruct. Another set of T cells, nicknamed “helpers,” can coax B cells to mature into antibody-making machines.


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-17--An Arctic Warming Anomaly? revisited

An Arctic Warming Anomaly? revisited

A recent PSI news post by Andy Rowlands highlighted some curious anomalies in the Danish Meteorological Institute ’ s ( DMI ) Arctic temperature data .
Andy ’ s article focused mainly on the summer temperatures , which do not show any significant warming trends over the 1958-2010 period .
Curiously , the winter temperatures do reflect global trends : the colder mid-60 ’ s , the heating to the mid-70 ’ s , a heating trend from 2000 onwards .
These two distinct graphs must reflect the fact that different heating processes dominate the Arctic energy balance during the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unique in that it is far removed from the confounding influence of the open oceans ( and their energy ) that dominate most weather systems : the processes that are at play are mostly local , and not “ imported ” e.g .
from a relatively warm ocean body that can transfer energy to the Arctic .
The IPCC identify1 two heating processes that are active during all seasons : “ natural forcing ” due to solar irradiation and volcanics and “ anthropogenic forcing ” due to greenhouse gasses and aerosols .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fluctuating around an anomaly value of 0 , so does not show the “ fingerprints ” of an ever-increasing anthropogenic forcing .
The flat line is consistent with the IPCC claim1 that solar irradiation does not vary significantly over the 1958-2020 period .
In a nutshell : the graph is consistent with a summer season that is dominated by a relatively unvarying solar irradiation forcing combined with little to no anthropogenic forcing .
The winter period is a different matter : it clearly shows a warming trend since 2000 .
Solar irradiation forcing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ during winter .
Anthropogenic forcing was shown to be absent during the summer , so it is unlikely that it makes a comeback during winter .
Therefore the heating process must be one that is unrecognized by the IPCC : it is likely geomagnetic induction heating of the ocean ’ s currents ( https : //principia-scientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/vogel-prom-paper.pdf ) .
The Magnetic North Pole shifted from just west of Ellesmere Island in 2000 to a location quite proximal to the geographic North Pole in 2020 ( https : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Magnetic_Pole ) .
An area of relatively @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and causes geomagnetic induction heating of the Arctic currents , e.g .
the Transpolar Current .
This heating energy is dwarfed by solar irradiation during the summers , but clearly has a relatively large impact during the periods when solar irradiation energy is absent or low , i.e .
winter .
Note that temperatures are not additive , and that the increasing trend of the temperature anomalies during the winter months should be seen as an increase of energy supplied to the Arctic .
Geomagnetic induction heating of the ocean ’ s currents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supply this energy during the winter months .
PS My apologies to Andy for usurping his subject , but the above seemed a bit long to add to the comments of his article .
[ 1 ] Bindoff , N.L.
, P.A .
Stott , K.M .
AchutaRao , M.R .
Allen , N. Gillett , D. Gutzler , K. Hansingo , G. Hegerl , Y. Hu , S. Jain , I.I .
Mokhov , J. Overland , J. Perlwitz , R. Sebbari and X. Zhang , 2013 : Detection and Attribution of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In : Climate Change 2013 : The Physical Science Basis .
Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [ Stocker , T.F.
, D. Qin , G.-K. Plattner , M. Tignor , S.K .
Allen , J. Boschung , A. Nauels , Y. Xia , V. Bex and P.M. Midgley ( eds. )
] .
Cambridge University Press , Cambridge , United Kingdom and New York , NY , USA .
About the author : Koen Vogel PhD received his PhD in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worked in the Petroleum Industry for 25 years in a variety of technical and managerial roles , and since his retirement has been engaged in pursuing his intellectual interests .
Such interests include reviewing the IPCC reports , authoring a book on Geostatistics ( currently in review ) , and editing technical proposals for start-ups .
His latest paper , ‘ The Role of Geomagnetic Induction Heating in Climate Change ’ is available for open peer review on Principia Scientific International ( please submit comments below on Koen Vogel ’ s new paper @ @ @ @ @ @ @ registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

An Arctic Warming Anomaly? revisited
Written by Koen Vogel PhD
A recent PSI news post by Andy Rowlands highlighted some curious anomalies in the Danish Meteorological Institute’s (DMI) Arctic temperature data. Andy’s article focused mainly on the summer temperatures, which do not show any significant warming trends over the 1958-2010 period.
(Source: http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/meant80n_anomaly.uk.php)
Curiously, the winter temperatures do reflect global trends: the colder mid-60’s, the heating to the mid-70’s, a heating trend from 2000 onwards. These two distinct graphs must reflect the fact that different heating processes dominate the Arctic energy balance during the different seasons.
The Arctic is relatively unique in that it is far removed from the confounding influence of the open oceans (and their energy) that dominate most weather systems: the processes that are at play are mostly local, and not “imported” e.g. from a relatively warm ocean body that can transfer energy to the Arctic.
The IPCC identify1 two heating processes that are active during all seasons: “natural forcing” due to solar irradiation and volcanics and “anthropogenic forcing” due to greenhouse gasses and aerosols. The summer temperature is basically a flat line fluctuating around an anomaly value of 0, so does not show the “fingerprints” of an ever-increasing anthropogenic forcing.
The flat line is consistent with the IPCC claim1 that solar irradiation does not vary significantly over the 1958-2020 period. In a nutshell: the graph is consistent with a summer season that is dominated by a relatively unvarying solar irradiation forcing combined with little to no anthropogenic forcing.
The winter period is a different matter: it clearly shows a warming trend since 2000. Solar irradiation forcing has gone: the Arctic is dark during winter. Anthropogenic forcing was shown to be absent during the summer, so it is unlikely that it makes a comeback during winter. Therefore the heating process must be one that is unrecognized by the IPCC: it is likely geomagnetic induction heating of the ocean’s currents (https://principia-scientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/vogel-prom-paper.pdf).
The Magnetic North Pole shifted from just west of Ellesmere Island in 2000 to a location quite proximal to the geographic North Pole in 2020 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Magnetic_Pole). An area of relatively intense geomagnetic variability accompanied this migration, and causes geomagnetic induction heating of the Arctic currents, e.g. the Transpolar Current.
This heating energy is dwarfed by solar irradiation during the summers, but clearly has a relatively large impact during the periods when solar irradiation energy is absent or low, i.e. winter. Note that temperatures are not additive, and that the increasing trend of the temperature anomalies during the winter months should be seen as an increase of energy supplied to the Arctic. Geomagnetic induction heating of the ocean’s currents is the only plausible mechanism that can supply this energy during the winter months.
PS My apologies to Andy for usurping his subject, but the above seemed a bit long to add to the comments of his article.
[1] Bindoff, N.L., P.A. Stott, K.M. AchutaRao, M.R. Allen, N. Gillett, D. Gutzler, K. Hansingo, G. Hegerl, Y. Hu, S. Jain, I.I. Mokhov, J. Overland, J. Perlwitz, R. Sebbari and X. Zhang, 2013: Detection and Attribution of Climate Change: from Global to Regional. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
About the author: Koen Vogel PhD received his PhD in Geology from The Pennsylvania State University, worked in the Petroleum Industry for 25 years in a variety of technical and managerial roles, and since his retirement has been engaged in pursuing his intellectual interests. Such interests include reviewing the IPCC reports, authoring a book on Geostatistics (currently in review), and editing technical proposals for start-ups. His latest paper, ‘The Role of Geomagnetic Induction Heating in Climate Change’ is available for open peer review on Principia Scientific International (please submit comments below on Koen Vogel’s new paper).
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-17--The five biggest coronavirus myths BUSTED!

The coronavirus misinformation that scientists , politicians and media have fed to the public has been shocking .
Take a tour through the bizarre , contradictory and downright ludicrous myths that have done more damage than Covid .
Or rather , do read it , but don ’ t expect to like it .
There is no place for assumptions here—only logical thought from first principles .
The only aim is to debunk the biggest myths that the media and political establishment have propagated .
And if you can hear me out then I salute you ; there are few @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Myth 1 : Slowing the spread of the virus is a good idea This is the fundamental premise of the world ’ s ‘ response ’ to Covid , from which all else springs .
But it has never been established that we should be trying to slow the virus down , not even from the blinkered point of view of just saving lives in the short term .
Slowing the spread of the virus was initially sold to us as a way of protecting health services : if everyone gets sick @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to bursting point and people will die on gurneys in car parks outside .
Remember ‘ flatten the curve ’ ?
Since Covid infections are inevitable , spreading them out through time will indirectly save lives by ensuring that everyone who can be saved by medical interventions – oxygen masks and ventilators – will be .
A noble idea , but as it happened , a misguided one .
Most hospitals spent the months of the outbreak as good as empty .
All other medical treatments were postponed in order to prepare for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lungs up—an onslaught that never arrived .
Even intensive care units rarely reached full capacity , and it quickly became apparent that for the people most at risk from Covid , ventilator and intensive care treatment is unsuitable .
Only a tiny minority of those who have died actually died in intensive care—old people with many co-morbidities are best kept in ordinary wards .
So ‘ flatten the curve ’ was a dead duck , but doesn ’ t it make sense to slow the spread of the virus anyway ?
Well , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would die of Covid if they caught it can evade the virus until a vaccine is developed .
If vulnerable people who believe that they have not caught the virus ( they may be asymptomatic ) want to wait for a putative vaccine , then they should be more upfront about their intentions .
Because if they can ’ t , then there is no point to any of this .
In addition , there is at least one theory why you could be doing someone a favour by giving them the virus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a respiratory virus spreads , it loses potency .
A successful virus is a mild one , which does not kill its host before they can spread it .
This is how herd immunity really works in this context : it ’ s about the changes to the virus itself .
In contrast , when we locked down , the virus had nowhere to go .
Instead of getting milder , all of the most dangerous strains came together in the only places where sick people gathered : nursing homes and hospitals .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the virus was becoming more contagious with jubilation—it is better that the virus spread freely , at least among the healthy .
But let ’ s pretend for a while that it isn ’ t better .
Because without the fundamental assumption that spreading = bad , the rest of the discussion is flipped on its head .
‘ Spikes ’ become cause for relief , not concern .
Masks , if they work , would become counter-productive .
I am not claiming this as truth—only that it is at least as likely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you can suspend your disbelief for long enough to imagine that hindering the spread of the virus is worthwhile , then you might be forgiven for assuming that lockdowns are the way to do it .
There is , however , no suggestion , let alone evidence , that lockdowns would pose a problem for a wily virus .
If lockdowns played any part at all , we would expect to see a correlation between the different forms of lockdowns enforced by various regions or countries , and the shape of the death @ @ @ @ @ @ @ correlation is zero .
Belgium , the UK , New York : strict lockdowns ; lots of deaths .
Sweden , Japan , Uruguay : light or no lockdowns ; few deaths .
You can point to opposite examples , but that ’ s just the point—there is no consistency .
And before you try to explain away individual countries with hand waving about ‘ different cultures ’ or ‘ better testing ’ , there is no correlation with any of those things either .
Simply put , there is nothing that can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any measure taken by any government in the world to block the virus has worked .
Lockdowns may be the biggest tools in the shed , but they are still faulty .
Early in the outbreak , there seemed to be a connection between those countries with impressive track and trace capabilities , like Germany and South Korea , and their ability to cope .
Of course , the tracking and tracing itself could not have been ‘ curing ’ the population of Covid .
No one knew why there seemed to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Months later , still no one knows .
But that has not stopped western governments from pathetic attempts to emulate the conformist East Asian societies with contact tracing apps and programmes .
Despite a not inconsiderable propaganda campaign , they have all failed miserably .
This is largely because not enough people even have any symptoms anymore , months after the virus peaked .
Trying to ramp up contact tracing in August goes beyond locking the barn door after the horse has bolted .
This horse bolted so long ago that now herds @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Meanwhile , the farmer ruins his homestead in order to pour his resources into increasingly elaborate and expensive door locking contraptions .
Myth 4 : BAME people are more at risk For BAME , insert whatever ethnic or other minority you have read is worst affected by the virus outbreak .
Of course , the virus is racist—everything else is .
Factoids like this come from dividing the sick or the dead into their Woke groupings and then comparing the proportions to the population as a whole .
And no doubt , BAME @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such statistics .
But the risk is at the population level , and is almost entirely explained by mediating factors like obesity , diabetes and other co-morbidities , more prevalent in some populations than in others .
If you are in your eighties , overweight and sickly , then you should be worried about catching the virus regardless of your race .
Similarly , if you are fit and under 60 you are more likely to be struck by lightning than killed by the virus , regardless of your race .
There has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suggestion , that lower Vitamin D levels in black people could play a part , but that is not behind the disparities .
This basic statistical point makes ridiculous the notion that some professional athletes were worried about returning to their sport .
I actually feel sorry for the likes of Troy Deeney ( not just because he ’ s been relegated with Watford ) but because he has been understandably frightened by poor scientific communication .
As a healthy young BAME man , there is no reason to suspect that he himself @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he has been persuaded that he is by a regime that distils power from fear .
Myth 5 : For schools to open , pubs must close What utter rot this is .
The individual who came up with this false trade-off would have a bright career in board game design , if they were not earning so much as a public servant .
This is simply a fabrication , and as such somewhat difficult to disprove , rather like the existence of invisible fairies .
You could just , you know , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the schools too ?
But I suppose then there would be a ‘ second wave ’ in deaths two weeks later .
You know , like the second wave that was warned of in May .
And then June .
And then July .
Only in the past two weeks did the WHO finally give up the dream and change its story to ‘ One Big Wave ’ , which doesn ’ t have the same ring to it .
But the second wave fiction has not yet been memory holed—it can be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any further assaults on our remaining freedoms .
All I can do is predict that a second wave in deaths will never materialise , and every day since April I have been proven right .
The establishment , in contrast , makes wrong predictions again and again , and are never held to account .
They just change the prediction , and hope everyone forgets about what they said a week ago .
Don ’ t wear masks .
Don ’ t go to work .
Go to work , but don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you do , wear a mask .
Do not be fooled into thinking that the confusion is incidental .
It is part of the plan—confused people are easier to control .
It may have been Joseph Goebbels who said : ‘ ’ If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it , people will eventually come to believe it.
’ ’ It seems this is an evergreen statement ; not only is there no limit to the size of the lie , there seems to be no limit on the number @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and if they are consistently proven right , eventually they become theory .
Einstein is heralded because he made predictions about black holes that are only being proven true almost a century later .
Many fine minds have put their necks out to make predictions about the nature of this outbreak , despite slime and slander from the cheerleaders of the elite .
But when they are vindicated , the cheerleaders just drown them out .
In contrast , Neil Ferguson is rolled out again and the second wavers just keep saying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ When will this end ?
Never .
Not until we have a complete rethink .
Logic and reason have not worked .
It ’ s time for a new approach .
About the author : Peter Andrews is an Irish science journalist and writer based in London .
He has a background in the life sciences , and graduated from the University of Glasgow with a degree in genetics .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester @ @ @ @ @ @ @ DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

The five biggest coronavirus myths BUSTED!
Written by Peter Andrews
The coronavirus misinformation that scientists, politicians and media have fed to the public has been shocking. Take a tour through the bizarre, contradictory and downright ludicrous myths that have done more damage than Covid.
TRIGGER WARNING! Do not read this if you are a loyal member of the Branch Covidians, cravenly awaiting the pleasure-pain prick of the Covid vaccine before you will appear in your own garden without a face nappy.
Or rather, do read it, but don’t expect to like it. There is no place for assumptions here—only logical thought from first principles. The only aim is to debunk the biggest myths that the media and political establishment have propagated.
And if you can hear me out then I salute you; there are few of us left who hold open minds.
Myth 1: Slowing the spread of the virus is a good idea
This is the fundamental premise of the world’s ‘response’ to Covid, from which all else springs. But it has never been established that we should be trying to slow the virus down, not even from the blinkered point of view of just saving lives in the short term.
Slowing the spread of the virus was initially sold to us as a way of protecting health services: if everyone gets sick at once, the hospitals will fill to bursting point and people will die on gurneys in car parks outside. Remember ‘flatten the curve’? Since Covid infections are inevitable, spreading them out through time will indirectly save lives by ensuring that everyone who can be saved by medical interventions – oxygen masks and ventilators – will be.
A noble idea, but as it happened, a misguided one. Most hospitals spent the months of the outbreak as good as empty. All other medical treatments were postponed in order to prepare for the onslaught of Covid patients coughing their lungs up—an onslaught that never arrived.
Even intensive care units rarely reached full capacity, and it quickly became apparent that for the people most at risk from Covid, ventilator and intensive care treatment is unsuitable. Only a tiny minority of those who have died actually died in intensive care—old people with many co-morbidities are best kept in ordinary wards.
So ‘flatten the curve’ was a dead duck, but doesn’t it make sense to slow the spread of the virus anyway? Well, only if you think that those who would die of Covid if they caught it can evade the virus until a vaccine is developed.
If vulnerable people who believe that they have not caught the virus (they may be asymptomatic) want to wait for a putative vaccine, then they should be more upfront about their intentions. Because if they can’t, then there is no point to any of this.
In addition, there is at least one theory why you could be doing someone a favour by giving them the virus. Evolutionary theory tells us that as a respiratory virus spreads, it loses potency. A successful virus is a mild one, which does not kill its host before they can spread it.
This is how herd immunity really works in this context: it’s about the changes to the virus itself. In contrast, when we locked down, the virus had nowhere to go. Instead of getting milder, all of the most dangerous strains came together in the only places where sick people gathered: nursing homes and hospitals.
This is why I greeted news that the virus was becoming more contagious with jubilation—it is better that the virus spread freely, at least among the healthy.
Myth 2: Lockdowns slow the spread
But let’s pretend for a while that it isn’t better. Because without the fundamental assumption that spreading = bad, the rest of the discussion is flipped on its head. ‘Spikes’ become cause for relief, not concern. Masks, if they work, would become counter-productive. I am not claiming this as truth—only that it is at least as likely as the classical model.
But if you can suspend your disbelief for long enough to imagine that hindering the spread of the virus is worthwhile, then you might be forgiven for assuming that lockdowns are the way to do it. There is, however, no suggestion, let alone evidence, that lockdowns would pose a problem for a wily virus.
If lockdowns played any part at all, we would expect to see a correlation between the different forms of lockdowns enforced by various regions or countries, and the shape of the death curves there. But we do not—the correlation is zero. Belgium, the UK, New York: strict lockdowns; lots of deaths. Sweden, Japan, Uruguay: light or no lockdowns; few deaths.
You can point to opposite examples, but that’s just the point—there is no consistency. And before you try to explain away individual countries with hand waving about ‘different cultures’ or ‘better testing’, there is no correlation with any of those things either.
Simply put, there is nothing that can be easily pointed at to suggest that any measure taken by any government in the world to block the virus has worked. Lockdowns may be the biggest tools in the shed, but they are still faulty.
Myth 3: Contact tracing is the answer
Early in the outbreak, there seemed to be a connection between those countries with impressive track and trace capabilities, like Germany and South Korea, and their ability to cope. Of course, the tracking and tracing itself could not have been ‘curing’ the population of Covid. No one knew why there seemed to be a positive effect from comprehensive testing. Months later, still no one knows.
But that has not stopped western governments from pathetic attempts to emulate the conformist East Asian societies with contact tracing apps and programmes. Despite a not inconsiderable propaganda campaign, they have all failed miserably. This is largely because not enough people even have any symptoms anymore, months after the virus peaked.
Trying to ramp up contact tracing in August goes beyond locking the barn door after the horse has bolted. This horse bolted so long ago that now herds of its descendants roam the countryside. Meanwhile, the farmer ruins his homestead in order to pour his resources into increasingly elaborate and expensive door locking contraptions.
Myth 4: BAME people are more at risk
For BAME, insert whatever ethnic or other minority you have read is worst affected by the virus outbreak. Of course, the virus is racist—everything else is. Factoids like this come from dividing the sick or the dead into their Woke groupings and then comparing the proportions to the population as a whole. And no doubt, BAME people are ‘over represented’ in such statistics.
But the risk is at the population level, and is almost entirely explained by mediating factors like obesity, diabetes and other co-morbidities, more prevalent in some populations than in others. If you are in your eighties, overweight and sickly, then you should be worried about catching the virus regardless of your race.
Similarly, if you are fit and under 60 you are more likely to be struck by lightning than killed by the virus, regardless of your race. There has been a suggestion, but only a suggestion, that lower Vitamin D levels in black people could play a part, but that is not behind the disparities.
This basic statistical point makes ridiculous the notion that some professional athletes were worried about returning to their sport. I actually feel sorry for the likes of Troy Deeney (not just because he’s been relegated with Watford) but because he has been understandably frightened by poor scientific communication.
As a healthy young BAME man, there is no reason to suspect that he himself is at an increased risk. But he has been persuaded that he is by a regime that distils power from fear.
Myth 5: For schools to open, pubs must close
What utter rot this is. The individual who came up with this false trade-off would have a bright career in board game design, if they were not earning so much as a public servant. This is simply a fabrication, and as such somewhat difficult to disprove, rather like the existence of invisible fairies.
You could just, you know, leave the pubs open and then open the schools too? But I suppose then there would be a ‘second wave’ in deaths two weeks later. You know, like the second wave that was warned of in May. And then June. And then July.
Only in the past two weeks did the WHO finally give up the dream and change its story to ‘One Big Wave’, which doesn’t have the same ring to it. But the second wave fiction has not yet been memory holed—it can be trotted out on demand to force through any further assaults on our remaining freedoms.
All I can do is predict that a second wave in deaths will never materialise, and every day since April I have been proven right. The establishment, in contrast, makes wrong predictions again and again, and are never held to account.
They just change the prediction, and hope everyone forgets about what they said a week ago. Don’t wear masks. Don’t go to work. Go to work, but don’t take public transport. But if you do, wear a mask. Do not be fooled into thinking that the confusion is incidental. It is part of the plan—confused people are easier to control.
The bigger the lie
It may have been Joseph Goebbels who said: ‘’If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.’’ It seems this is an evergreen statement; not only is there no limit to the size of the lie, there seems to be no limit on the number of lies either.
Hypotheses make predictions, and if they are consistently proven right, eventually they become theory. Einstein is heralded because he made predictions about black holes that are only being proven true almost a century later. Many fine minds have put their necks out to make predictions about the nature of this outbreak, despite slime and slander from the cheerleaders of the elite. But when they are vindicated, the cheerleaders just drown them out.
In contrast, Neil Ferguson is rolled out again and the second wavers just keep saying ‘wait another two weeks’. When will this end? Never. Not until we have a complete rethink. Logic and reason have not worked. It’s time for a new approach.
About the author: Peter Andrews is an Irish science journalist and writer based in London. He has a background in the life sciences, and graduated from the University of Glasgow with a degree in genetics.
Read more here.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-17--New Global Data: HCQ Could Have Cut COVID Deaths 80 Percent

New Global Data : HCQ Could Have Cut COVID Deaths 80 Percent Stunning evidence proves effectiveness of HCQ in treating coronavirus .
Data should land Dr. Fauci in prison.The mainstream media can ’ t hide this truth from the public forever .
The latest international testing of hydroxychloroquine treatment of coronavirus shows countries that had early use of the drug had a 79 % lower mortality rate than countries that banned the use of the safe malaria drug .
This means that Dr. Fauci , Dr. Birx , the CDC , the liberal fake news media and the tech giants @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had deadly consequences !
America has lost ( reportedly ) over 150,000 lives .
That could have been lowered by possibly 80 % if HCQ use would have been promoted in the US !
We are talking over 100,000 American lives could have been saved !
Here is the website that has compiled all of this international data .
Even developing nations Ukraine , Greece , Cuba , Morocco , Indonesia and Algeria fared better than the US under Dr. Fauci !
To this day Dr. Fauci , Dr. Birx , the CDC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ use of HCQ in the early treatment of hydroxychloroquine .
The American Thinker reported that the US has up to 30 times more deaths per population than countries that promoted its early use !
The above global map from CNN shows coronavirus deaths per 100,000 in population Notice the countries with the most deaths per 100,000 in population : * United States * United Kingdom * Spain * Italy * Sweden * Belgium * Brazil * Peru * Chile * Iran * Canada * Mexico Now notice the countries listed below from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) in treating coronavirus .
Notice again the country with the highest rate of death and limited use of HCQ : * Mexico * US * United Kingdom * Sweden * France * Ireland * Netherlands * Canada This confirms the effectiveness of HCQ in treating coronavirus .
And yet Dr. Fauci , the CDC and FDA continue to downplay its effectiveness .
At some point these killers should be called in to testify on this deadly mistake .
They are responsible for tens of thousands of US deaths .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ !
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

New Global Data: HCQ Could Have Cut COVID Deaths 80 Percent
Written by Jim Hoft
Stunning evidence proves effectiveness of HCQ in treating coronavirus. Data should land Dr. Fauci in prison.The mainstream media can’t hide this truth from the public forever.
The latest international testing of hydroxychloroquine treatment of coronavirus shows countries that had early use of the drug had a 79% lower mortality rate than countries that banned the use of the safe malaria drug.
This means that Dr. Fauci, Dr. Birx, the CDC, the liberal fake news media and the tech giants have been pushing a lie that has had deadly consequences!
America has lost (reportedly) over 150,000 lives. That could have been lowered by possibly 80% if HCQ use would have been promoted in the US! We are talking over 100,000 American lives could have been saved!
Here is the website that has compiled all of this international data. Even developing nations Ukraine, Greece, Cuba, Morocco, Indonesia and Algeria fared better than the US under Dr. Fauci! To this day Dr. Fauci, Dr. Birx, the CDC and the FDA refuse to promote the use of HCQ in the early treatment of hydroxychloroquine. The American Thinker reported that the US has up to 30 times more deaths per population than countries that promoted its early use!
The above global map from CNN shows coronavirus deaths per 100,000 in population Notice the countries with the most deaths per 100,000 in population:
* United States
* United Kingdom
* Spain
* Italy
* Sweden
* Belgium
* Brazil
* Peru
* Chile
* Iran
* Canada
* Mexico Now notice the countries listed below from the HCQTrial website that limited early use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in treating coronavirus. Notice again the country with the highest rate of death and limited use of HCQ:
* Mexico
* US
* United Kingdom
* Sweden
* France
* Ireland
* Netherlands
* Canada This confirms the effectiveness of HCQ in treating coronavirus. And yet Dr. Fauci, the CDC and FDA continue to downplay its effectiveness. At some point these killers should be called in to testify on this deadly mistake. They are responsible for tens of thousands of US deaths. They need to be held to account! Read more at www.thegatewaypundit.com **** PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related