principiascientificinternational--2020-09-09--Lockdown’s Hidden Mental Health Time Bomb

A University College London study which monitored 90,000 people at the height of the UK ’ s COVID19 lockdown paints a damning picture of increased widespread anxiety , stress and monotonous boredom .
This growing mental health crisis repeats itself worldwide and must be addressed .
Sadly , societal mental health impacts have been seemingly overlooked while governments and media speak incessantly about coronavirus ‘ cases.
’ As a result , more of us are turning to online counseling services for support .
The insidiousness of the ticking time bomb of pent up mental issues must be weighed alongside where @ @ @ @ @ @ @ frightening rise in suicides , domestic violence and street violence ( so-called peaceful protests ) which may scar families and communities over the longer term .
The UK ’ s Health Foundation has spoken out on serious concerns about victims of domestic abuse being locked down with perpetrators .
A report by MPs found 16 people – 14 women and 2 children – were killed in the first 3 weeks of lockdown , and calls to the national helpline Refuge were 49 % higher than usual .
This is one of the unintended @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to use lockdown as a pandemic remedy .
The psychological repercussions from the pandemic are creating a crisis that urgently needs further study and prompt remedial action to safeguard those at risk .
Worse yet , there appears no end in sight to this long-running nightmare .
In the United States as well as the UK and other nations , we are seeing a rise in new local lockdowns whereby a new surge in reported ‘ cases ’ for a local area is resulting in towns and cities having to close again ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of restricted movements , heightened worry and feeling there is no end to this nonsense .
Not helping the situation is the apparent flip-flopping of politicians who , for example , at the outset of the pandemic decried compulsory mask wearing only to make them mandatory ( with punitive fines for refusal ) after the ‘ curve ’ had already been flattened .
To many , the official advice often appears contradictory and lacking in basic common sense .
Some sections of society are worse hit .
The lonely and isolated , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vulnerable , While shop workers , front line essential service providers , the police , bus drivers , etc are too often at the sharp end of the rise in civil disobedience .
Counting the cost are bodies such as the UK Health Foundation which tells us : “ The Royal College of Psychiatrists reports almost half of psychiatrists have seen increases in urgent and emergency cases during lockdown , but also that a similar proportion have seen falls in routine appointments .
There are fears people are staying away until they reach @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a flood of exacerbated and untreated mental illness after the pandemic , and mental health providers are already reporting significant increases in demand and severity of new referrals .
The charity Mind has found that almost a quarter of people who tried to access mental health services during a fortnight in April failed to get any help.
” [ 1 ] So overwhelmed are these essential mental health workers that those in desperate need of counseling feel abandoned and locked out during lockdown .
Anne Marie Collins , President of the Australian Association @ @ @ @ @ @ @ where she works with patients who are battling personal trauma identifies what experts see as the five emotional states being evidenced from prolongation of the ‘ lockdown.
’ Speaking to the Daily Mail ( Australia ) Collins details the five stages many people go through as they feel overwhelming emotions as the impact of losing any real agency over our lives and our futures takes hold .
“ Coronavirus has triggered a sudden loss of structure and a loss of social contact for people all over the world , who are now trying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ working from home , or perhaps not working at all .
You can ’ t really put a time frame on it .
You have to allow people to move through the stages at different paces – it ’ s a very organic process that ’ s totally individual to us all .
Just know that whatever you are feeling is absolutely justified , ” she said .
Anyone suffering undue mental health issues should not be cowed into believing there is nothing that can be done .
Despite downsizing and integration of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for those who need it .
Even if physically traveling to see a counselor during lockdown is a problem there are online solutions such as BetterHelp which offers professional support from licensed therapists and counselors online .
The loss of personal agency , the ability to have control and a sense of direction and purpose in life is being undermined , if not permanently scarred by policymakers and so-called ‘ experts ’ who are being increasingly exposed as lacking foresight about the long term societal implications of their handling of this world-first mass @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if your mental health is impacted .
If you are unable or reluctant to reach out to friends , family and colleague do consider contacting online mental health support professionals who are now gearing up to meet this growing need .
About the author : John O ’ Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder ( with Dr Tim Ball ) of Principia Scientific International ( PSI ) .
John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert , Michael ‘ hockey stick ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the century ‘ .
O ’ Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘ Slayers ’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world ’ s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

BetterHelp: Lockdown’s Hidden Mental Health Time Bomb
Written by John O'Sullivan
A University College London study that monitored 90,000 people at the height of the UK’s COVID19 lockdown paints a damning picture of increased widespread anxiety, stress, and monotonous boredom. This growing mental health crisis repeats itself worldwide and must be addressed.
Sadly, societal mental health impacts have been seemingly overlooked while governments and media speak incessantly about coronavirus ‘cases.’ As a result, more of us are turning to online counseling services for support.
The insidiousness of the ticking time bomb of pent up mental issues must be weighed alongside where it may lead; very real and frightening rise in suicides, domestic violence, and street violence (so-called peaceful protests) which may scar families and communities over the longer term.
The UK’s Health Foundation has spoken out on serious concerns about victims of domestic abuse being locked down with perpetrators. A report by MPs found 16 people – 14 women and 2 children – were killed in the first 3 weeks of lockdown, and calls to the national helpline Refuge were 49% higher than usual. This is one of the unintended consequences of the public policy of governments to use lockdown as a pandemic remedy.
The psychological repercussions from the pandemic are creating a crisis that urgently needs further study and prompt remedial action to safeguard those at risk.
Worse yet, there appears no end in sight to this long-running nightmare. In the United States as well as the UK and other nations, we are seeing a rise in new local lockdowns whereby a new surge in reported ‘cases’ for a local area is resulting in towns and cities having to close again; reverting back to the full-on nightmare of restricted movements, heightened worry and feeling there is no end to this nonsense.
Not helping the situation is the apparent flip-flopping of politicians who, for example, at the outset of the pandemic decried compulsory mask-wearing only to make them mandatory (with punitive fines for refusal) after the ‘curve’ had already been flattened. To many, the official advice often appears contradictory and lacking in basic common sense.
Some sections of society are worse hit. The lonely and isolated, the unemployed, small business owners are especially vulnerable, While shop workers, front line essential service providers, the police, bus drivers, etc are too often at the sharp end of the rise in civil disobedience.
Counting the cost are bodies such as the UK Health Foundation which tells us:
“The Royal College of Psychiatrists reports almost half of psychiatrists have seen increases in urgent and emergency cases during lockdown, but also that a similar proportion have seen falls in routine appointments. There are fears people are staying away until they reach crisis point, which will result in a flood of exacerbated and untreated mental illness after the pandemic, and mental health providers are already reporting significant increases in demand and severity of new referrals. The charity Mind has found that almost a quarter of people who tried to access mental health services during a fortnight in April failed to get any help.” [1]
So overwhelmed are these essential mental health workers that those in desperate need of counseling feel abandoned and locked out during lockdown.
Anne Marie Collins, President of the Australian Association of Psychologists in Melbourne, Victoria, where she works with patients who are battling personal trauma identifies what experts see as the five emotional states being evidenced from the prolongation of the ‘lockdown.’
Speaking to the Daily Mail (Australia) Collins details the five stages many people go through as they feel overwhelming emotions as the impact of losing any real agency over our lives and our futures takes hold.
“Coronavirus has triggered a sudden loss of structure and a loss of social contact for people all over the world, who are now trying to create a new routine for themselves working from home, or perhaps not working at all. You can’t really put a time frame on it. You have to allow people to move through the stages at different paces – it’s a very organic process that’s totally individual to us all. Just know that whatever you are feeling is absolutely justified,” she said.
Collins emphasized that:
“Long-term effects like PTSD come from being stuck in enormous stress and not being able to do anything to change it.”
Anyone suffering from undue mental health issues should not be cowed into believing there is nothing that can be done. Despite downsizing and integration of local health services help is still available for those who need it.
Even if physically traveling to see a counselor during lockdown is a problem there are online solutions such as BetterHelp, which offers professional support from licensed therapists and counselors online.
Also, check out: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.betterhelp&hl=en_US
The loss of personal agency, the ability to have control and a sense of direction and purpose in life is being undermined, if not permanently scarred by policymakers and so-called ‘experts’ who are being increasingly exposed as lacking foresight about the long term societal implications of their handling of this world-first mass shutdown.
Do not give up hope if your mental health is impacted. If you are unable or reluctant to reach out to friends, family and colleagues do consider contacting online mental health support professionals who are now gearing up to meet this growing need.
[1] https://www.health.org.uk/news-and-comment/blogs/emerging-evidence-on-covid-19s-impact-on-mental-health-and-health
About the author: John O’Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI). John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr. Ball in defeating world-leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-09--When will people be normal again?

When will people be normal again?

When will people be normal again ?
You ’ ve probably heard about the new paper purporting to show that the Sturgis motorcycle rally in South Dakota is responsible for 266,000 new COVID “ cases.
” Oh , and the health cost will be $ 12.2 billion .
Now if this all seems ridiculous and over the top to you , and conforms just a little too neatly to the narrative — dumb Trumpers who refuse to listen to “ the science ” are going and getting people killed — that ’ s probably because it is .
I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ within the next few days .
But the general thrust is this : no joy in your lives , citizens !
For there is a virus !
So Los Angeles , for example , has just banned trick-or-treating this Halloween .
You know , because they ’ re super sciency in Los Angeles .
Trick-or-treating will go on in most places , and nothing will come of it .
“ What is the endpoint for people who still won ’ t resume their pre-COVID lives ?
Are they waiting for Fauci or a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ ?
What will it take ?
” That ’ s the question I ’ ve been stumbling toward but haven ’ t quite asked so bluntly .
Doomers get upset when you mention the flu , but it ’ s relevant : we learned to live with it .
We didn ’ t discontinue life-giving pleasures for young people ( and indeed for all people ) even though living normal lives will result in deaths .
If we get to a point where COVID claims 100 people per month , will this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if it saves even one life ” logic ( such as it is ) is correct , how can it be ?
Will these people still be cowering in their homes even then ?
That ’ s because we realize that truly human lives involve the very things that the world ’ s Faucis are now demonizing , and warning us we may never get back .
Even if continuing restrictions are obviously causing other deaths , that would have been avoidable otherwise ?
How do these people ever climb out of this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ governments step back .
I mean : how does someone who ’ s convinced himself that he can not leave his house go back to being a normal person ?
We may have two parallel societies for some time .
Unfortunately , the folks in the other society , the panic society , want to exercise power over you and how you make your living — you know , in the name of “ science.
” If you ’ re starting to think it might be a bad idea to let people like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or whether — you can work , you might think about starting something the loons can ’ t shut down .
Tonight one of my podcast guests ( one of whose businesses is the Rocket Language foreign-language instruction company ) is showing how he ’ s been doing it for nearly two decades , so be sure to join us tonight ( but sign up right now ) : http : //www.tomwoods.com/ unshutdownable PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

When will people be normal again?
Written by Tom Woods
You’ve probably heard about the new paper purporting to show that the Sturgis motorcycle rally in South Dakota is responsible for 266,000 new COVID “cases.”
Oh, and the health cost will be $12.2 billion.
Now if this all seems ridiculous and over the top to you, and conforms just a little too neatly to the narrative — dumb Trumpers who refuse to listen to “the science” are going and getting people killed — that’s probably because it is.
I’ll dig into that paper with you within the next few days.
But the general thrust is this: no joy in your lives, citizens! For there is a virus!
So Los Angeles, for example, has just banned trick-or-treating this Halloween. You know, because they’re super sciency in Los Angeles.
Trick-or-treating will go on in most places, and nothing will come of it.
On Twitter today someone asked:
“What is the endpoint for people who still won’t resume their pre-COVID lives? Are they waiting for Fauci or a wise governor to signal the ‘all-clear’? What will it take?”
That’s the question I’ve been stumbling toward but haven’t quite asked so bluntly.
Doomers get upset when you mention the flu, but it’s relevant: we learned to live with it. We didn’t discontinue life-giving pleasures for young people (and indeed for all people) even though living normal lives will result in deaths.
If we get to a point where COVID claims 100 people per month, will this be sufficient? But if the “if it saves even one life” logic (such as it is) is correct, how can it be? Will these people still be cowering in their homes even then?
That’s because we realize that truly human lives involve the very things that the world’s Faucis are now demonizing, and warning us we may never get back.
Even if continuing restrictions are obviously causing other deaths, that would have been avoidable otherwise?
How do these people ever climb out of this?
I don’t mean how governments step back. I mean: how does someone who’s convinced himself that he cannot leave his house go back to being a normal person?
I honestly don’t know.
We may have two parallel societies for some time.
Unfortunately, the folks in the other society, the panic society, want to exercise power over you and how you make your living — you know, in the name of “science.”
If you’re starting to think it might be a bad idea to let people like this have a say over how — or whether — you can work, you might think about starting something the loons can’t shut down. Tonight one of my podcast guests (one of whose businesses is the Rocket Language foreign-language instruction company) is showing how he’s been doing it for nearly two decades, so be sure to join us tonight (but sign up right now): http://www.tomwoods.com/ unshutdownable
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-09--Secretive 5G ‘Small Cell’ Planning Takes a Legal Hit in U.S. Court

In an important win for those who are concerned about 5G and small cell wireless proliferation , on August 26 , 2020 the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts dismissed a lawsuit by “ neutral host ” provider ExteNet Systems , Inc. against the City of Cambridge , MA .
The case could have far-reaching impacts when “ neutral host providers ” like American Tower , Crown Castle and ExteNet try to secure approval to occupy municipal rights-of-way .
Neutral host providers build wireless infrastructure and then lease space to the wireless companies ( like AT & T @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the wireless service .
ExteNet filed several applications in Cambridge to replace utility light poles with new ones that housed equipment to be leased to AT & T .
AT & T , not ExteNet , would supply the fiber connections and electric power .
Cambridge ’ s Pole and Conduit Siting Policy requires applicants working on a proposed project with other companies to designate a lead company for the application .
In practical terms this means the local authority can identify deficiencies at any time and/or deny the application because of a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lead company has responsibility for coordinating the applications , permitting , constructions , wiring , and operation and acts as the point of contact .
As such , the lead company must obtain all the necessary information and provide it to the planning commission as part of the application .
In this case , ExteNet did not obtain or provide any information about how the facilities would obtain power or fiber connections , even though the policy expressly required that information .
Nor was ExteNet able to provide sufficient information to demonstrate actual @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be supported by the facility , which was another substantive Cambridge requirement .
The City denied ExteNet ’ s permit applications because of the missing information .
ExteNet contended the City ’ s procedure was unlawful because it unreasonably waited until the end of the allowed period for the review of the application ( shot clock ) before it advised ExteNet of the deficiencies .
ExteNet also challenged the substantive requirement that ExteNet provide information that only its customer ( AT & T ) could provide .
First , the court ruled that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rules do not require a local permitting authority to provide notice of any deficiencies to the applicant within 10 days .
It interpreted the rules to say that notice of deficiency within 10 days is only required if the local authority wants to stop or reset the shot clock .
In practical terms this means the local authority can identify deficiencies at any time and/or deny the application because of a deficiency at the very end .
.
.
.
Will require that the wireless companies who will be leasing from the neutral @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the necessary information , whereas until now they have been able to avoid the need to do so while also keeping important information away from cities and concerned citizens .
The district court approved Cambridge ’ s substantive requirement for all relevant information .
The Cambridge policy required that the “ applications include evidence that the proposed installation is needed to prevent a material inhibition of wireless services.
” ExteNet did not ( and claimed it could not ) make this showing since AT & T was the customer and the one with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were needed to fill a significant gap in coverage , would in fact be used to fill any gap that did exist , and there were no viable alternative locations .
The court held , however , that ExteNet had a burden of proof and failed to meet it .
“ Where ExteNet ’ s complaint and its original applications fail to show the existence of a coverage gap , it is impossible to infer that the denial of ExteNet ’ s applications has the effect of prohibiting the provision of wireless services @ @ @ @ @ @ @ did not allege sufficient facts to show that Cambridge ’ s application information requirements did or could materially inhibit the provision of service .
The court readily accepted Cambridge ’ s argument that the information it required was relevant to and necessary for any intelligent and reasonable assessment of the application ’ s merits .
The court stated : “ Because a wireless facility could not function without power and data , requiring information concerning that power and data is not an effective prohibition of the provision of wireless services .
… Further @ @ @ @ @ @ @ joint applications would , in all circumstances , “ materially inhibit or limit the ability of any competitor .
.
.
to compete in a fair and balanced legal and regulatory environment.
” This decision has major implications for applications by neutral host providers .
The now-affirmed information requirements will – as a practical matter – require that the wireless companies who will be leasing from the neutral host provider be named participants and provide the necessary information , whereas until now they have been able to avoid the need to do so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cities and concerned citizens .
It may also , in the long term , eliminate some of the business case justifications for the neutral host business .
This is important since a very large portion of the small cell deployments are planned , permitted and constructed by the neutral host providers .
Cities can now justifiably demand to know who will be using the wireless infrastructure and in position to obtain more information and commitments from them .
Finally , it will allow cities to better determine whether and where wireless facilities are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will support .
• MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO TAKE NOTICE OF MATERIALS CITED IN COMPLAINT , AND REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT • DEFENDANTS ’ MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT • CITY OF CAMBRIDGE POLE AND CONDUIT COMMISSION ’ S POLICY REGARDING SMALL CELL WIRELESS • CITY OF CAMBRIDGE POLE AND CONDUIT SITING POLICY RELATING TO GRANTS OF LOCATION FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES NETWORKS .
• AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND EXPEDITED REVIEW PURSUANT TO 47 U.S.C .
§ 332 ( c ) ( 7 ) ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS ’ MOTION TO DISMISS PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Secretive 5G ‘Small Cell’ Planning Takes a Legal Hit in U.S. Court
Written by Scott McCollough Attorney at Law
In an important win for those who are concerned about 5G and small cell wireless proliferation, on August 26, 2020 the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts dismissed a lawsuit by “neutral host” provider ExteNet Systems, Inc. against the City of Cambridge, MA.
The case could have far-reaching impacts when “neutral host providers” like American Tower, Crown Castle and ExteNet try to secure approval to occupy municipal rights-of-way. Neutral host providers build wireless infrastructure and then lease space to the wireless companies (like AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon) that provide the wireless service.
ExteNet filed several applications in Cambridge to replace utility light poles with new ones that housed equipment to be leased to AT&T. AT&T, not ExteNet, would supply the fiber connections and electric power. Cambridge’s Pole and Conduit Siting Policy requires applicants working on a proposed project with other companies to designate a lead company for the application.
In practical terms this means the local authority can identify deficiencies at any time and/or deny the application because of a deficiency at the very end.
The lead company has responsibility for coordinating the applications, permitting, constructions, wiring, and operation and acts as the point of contact. As such, the lead company must obtain all the necessary information and provide it to the planning commission as part of the application. In this case, ExteNet did not obtain or provide any information about how the facilities would obtain power or fiber connections, even though the policy expressly required that information. Nor was ExteNet able to provide sufficient information to demonstrate actual need for the wireless coverage that would be supported by the facility, which was another substantive Cambridge requirement.
The City denied ExteNet’s permit applications because of the missing information. ExteNet contended the City’s procedure was unlawful because it unreasonably waited until the end of the allowed period for the review of the application (shot clock) before it advised ExteNet of the deficiencies. ExteNet also challenged the substantive requirement that ExteNet provide information that only its customer (AT&T) could provide.
The district court rejected ExteNet’s procedural and substantive claims.
First, the court ruled that the FCC’s procedural shot clock rules do not require a local permitting authority to provide notice of any deficiencies to the applicant within 10 days. It interpreted the rules to say that notice of deficiency within 10 days is only required if the local authority wants to stop or reset the shot clock. In practical terms this means the local authority can identify deficiencies at any time and/or deny the application because of a deficiency at the very end.
. . . Will require that the wireless companies who will be leasing from the neutral host provider be named participants and provide the necessary information, whereas until now they have been able to avoid the need to do so while also keeping important information away from cities and concerned citizens.
The district court approved Cambridge’s substantive requirement for all relevant information. The Cambridge policy required that the “applications include evidence that the proposed installation is needed to prevent a material inhibition of wireless services.” ExteNet did not (and claimed it could not) make this showing since AT&T was the customer and the one with the information necessary to prove the facilities were needed to fill a significant gap in coverage, would in fact be used to fill any gap that did exist, and there were no viable alternative locations. The court held, however, that ExteNet had a burden of proof and failed to meet it. “Where ExteNet’s complaint and its original applications fail to show the existence of a coverage gap, it is impossible to infer that the denial of ExteNet’s applications has the effect of prohibiting the provision of wireless services”. The court ruled that ExteNet did not allege sufficient facts to show that Cambridge’s application information requirements did or could materially inhibit the provision of service.
The court readily accepted Cambridge’s argument that the information it required was relevant to and necessary for any intelligent and reasonable assessment of the application’s merits. The court stated: “Because a wireless facility could not function without power and data, requiring information concerning that power and data is not an effective prohibition of the provision of wireless services. … Further, ExteNet has not alleged that forcing joint applications would, in all circumstances, “materially inhibit or limit the ability of any competitor . . . to compete in a fair and balanced legal and regulatory environment.”
This decision has major implications for applications by neutral host providers. The now-affirmed information requirements will – as a practical matter – require that the wireless companies who will be leasing from the neutral host provider be named participants and provide the necessary information, whereas until now they have been able to avoid the need to do so while also keeping important information away from cities and concerned citizens. It may also, in the long term, eliminate some of the business case justifications for the neutral host business. This is important since a very large portion of the small cell deployments are planned, permitted and constructed by the neutral host providers. Cities can now justifiably demand to know who will be using the wireless infrastructure and in position to obtain more information and commitments from them. Finally, it will allow cities to better determine whether and where wireless facilities are actually needed, and the services they will support.
Documentation:
Read more at childrenshealthdefense.org
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print


What If?

Following on from my ‘ Hot and Cold ’ light essay here is perhaps a more thought-provoking essay about light .
The comments to the hot and cold essay raised points about reflected and remitted light .
My questions were about hot and cold sources , the comments skirted those questions .
To explain a little more let me look very carefully at the Moon .
Reflected light or remitted light or some of both ?
The light we see , I am very careful NOT to say the photons ; have a very hot light source , our star @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the sun ’ s surface some 6k degrees kelvin .
Lots is from the Sun ’ s atmosphere – one million degrees Kelvin .
That disparate mix reaches the moon , just how quickly depends upon conjecture , theory and accepted science , you know my stance on accepted science !
From observations here on Earth we know that there is a Solar Wind .
Real honest to God particles that have significant energy that took around Eight minutes to reach our upper atmosphere , aka Norther/Southern Lights .
This implies that they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ !
What if they were slower , much slower ?
Observe a sunset or sunrise , what do you see ; remember ‘ look ’ and ‘ see ’ have two very different meanings to me !
That twilight time varies according to latitude and season .
Some of the Sun ’ s energy is colliding with upper atmosphere ’ s particles and causing reflected/re-emitted light to reach our eyes .
It wakes up birds .
IT CAUSES SUNFLOWER BLOSSOMS TO RE-ORIENT TOWARDS THE DAWN !
This is no accident !
Our star @ @ @ @ @ @ @ STUFF every pico-second and has been doing that for a few billion years .
We and the entire solar system are bathed in all that energy and particle matter .
SO !
Where am I going with this ?
A photon or energy parcel contains a measurable amount of energy .
HOW much energy does an atom or electron coming from the sun have ?
More or Less ?
Can the scientists casually equate the incoming energy as the same sort of energy ?
Do those scientists even know that there are different @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Earth from the Sun ?
Probably even more importantly , can their calculations which have such huge discrepancies be trusted as Scientifically proven data ?
I leave you with these questions and add a sting it the tail .
What If the LOCAL speed of light is dependent upon the LOCAL Gravity ?
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The @ @ @

What If?
Written by Michael Clarke (Logician)
Following on from my ‘Hot and Cold’ light essay here is perhaps a more thought-provoking essay about light. The comments to the hot and cold essay raised points about reflected and remitted light. My questions were about hot and cold sources, the comments skirted those questions.
To explain a little more let me look very carefully at the Moon. Reflected light or remitted light or some of both? The light we see, I am very careful NOT to say the photons; have a very hot light source, our star! Some of that light is from the sun’s surface some 6k degrees kelvin. Lots is from the Sun’s atmosphere – one million degrees Kelvin.
That disparate mix reaches the moon, just how quickly depends upon conjecture, theory and accepted science, you know my stance on accepted science!
From observations here on Earth we know that there is a Solar Wind. Real honest to God particles that have significant energy that took around Eight minutes to reach our upper atmosphere, aka Norther/Southern Lights. This implies that they were travelling at the speed of light!
What if they were slower, much slower?
Observe a sunset or sunrise, what do you see; remember ‘look’ and ‘see’ have two very different meanings to me! That twilight time varies according to latitude and season. Some of the Sun’s energy is colliding with upper atmosphere’s particles and causing reflected/re-emitted light to reach our eyes. It wakes up birds. IT CAUSES SUNFLOWER BLOSSOMS TO RE-ORIENT TOWARDS THE DAWN!
This is no accident!
Our star is launching into space huge amounts of STUFF every pico-second and has been doing that for a few billion years. We and the entire solar system are bathed in all that energy and particle matter.
SO! Where am I going with this?
A photon or energy parcel contains a measurable amount of energy. HOW much energy does an atom or electron coming from the sun have? More or Less?
Can the scientists casually equate the incoming energy as the same sort of energy?
Do those scientists even know that there are different sources of energy arriving here at planet Earth from the Sun? Probably even more importantly, can their calculations which have such huge discrepancies be trusted as Scientifically proven data?
I leave you with these questions and add a sting it the tail. What If the LOCAL speed of light is dependent upon the LOCAL Gravity?
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-09--BetterHelp: Lockdown’s Hidden Mental Health Time Bomb


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-10--The COVID Winter is Coming!

The COVID Winter is Coming!

We all know the testing is useless .
Not fit for purpose and full of false positives .
A SARS-COV-2 Lockdown Warning .
– Article 7 of 7 ( links at the bottom of this article ) .
So faulty that even AHS , NHS and the CDC ( and many others ) have publicly stated this .
Yet these tests are encouraged ( sometimes demanded ) and used as an excuse to shut down people ’ s lives , care homes , businesses and now schools .
This testing has exploded by government decree in recent weeks .
As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the fear mongering , but false , statements of rising infections and ‘ hot spots ’ , ‘ outbreaks ’ and more .
Each one associated with false asymptomatic voluntary testing .
In addition to this use of testing to get people used to more lockdowns , we see any symptom also being used as an excuse to ‘ Stay Safe ’ when they really mean ‘ Stay Scared ’ .
No longer is a cough a symptom of a chest infection .
No longer is a runny nose a side effect of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cold .
All roads lead only to COVID .
Whereas all the other causes of these symptoms have treatments and remedies to prevent them from becoming worse or even deadly , the treatment for COVID is forced isolation and removal of medical care .
You either get better or become too sick to be treated .
At worst ( if you don ’ t die isolated at home or in a care centre ) your fate will be intubated ventilation , only to die in over 90 % of ‘ Cases ’ .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ now .
COVID is dying out , isn ’ t it ?
Maybe we won ’ t get a second wave… Think again about the first paragraphs above .
We are entering flu season .
COVID has a symptomatic rate of less than 15 % meaning less than 15 % of people who apparently contract COVID have any symptoms at all .
Flu , on the other hand , has a symptomatic rate ( from mild to moderate ) of over 90 % .
In an average year , in the US alone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one of the many flu ’ s that circulate .
90 % will exhibit symptoms that will be diagnosed as a second wave of COVID .
This is around 45 million people being misdiagnosed with COVID in the next six months .
Up to 900,000,000 ( 900 million ) people worldwide will be misdiagnosed with COVID if nothing changes .
If that number being flashed on the screen everyday doesn ’ t scare half the population to death , I don ’ t know what would .
Up to 1 Billion people worldwide @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they have is a cold or the flu ) .
None getting early or appropriate treatment .
Add to that the large number of people who will develop COVID symptoms after the vaccine .
100 % of people in all vaccine trials have exhibited mild to moderate symptoms .
Will they also be misdiagnosed as COVID forcing isolation and lack of even basic care allowing a mild reaction to potentially become deadly ?
Add into this the number of potential bacterial respiratory infections from poor mask hygiene and improper mask use .
Not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ load uptake caused by rebreathing shedding virus .
All this with an immune system devastated by the previous 8 months of fear , lack of care and lack of sunlight .
Will anyone not exhibit some symptom of COVID in the Winter of 2020 ?
Consider millions or billions of people suddenly being diagnosed with COVID and being locked down martial law style .
Arrested if you leave the house or hauled away from your house , work or school for ‘ isolation ’ .
Have you seen the ‘ free ’ society @ @ @ @ @ @ @ less ‘ Cases ’ than most provinces in Canada !
Be prepared !
We were softened up over the summer for a cull in the winter .
This is the culling of society by design .
We can no longer put these measures down to ignorance or the perception of caring .
Health professionals and governments know what they are doing .
Whether our governments or health officials are just afraid to admit it or are too power ‘ mad ’ to let go is no longer relevant .
Barron Munchausen , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all your proxies !
https : //www.uofmhealth.org/health-library/hw180537 Countries , States and Provinces are using a ‘ Cases ’ per 100,000 measure to enact stricter lockdowns .
These start at around 20 per 100,000 and go up to 100 per 100,000 .
In Alberta , an average flu year recently has ranged from 179 to 215 cases per 100,000 .
That is just lab confirmed hospitalized rates .
Now take all the testing strategies being normalized and apply that to a flu season .
We will see manufactured ‘ Case ’ rates in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If we continue to test and report as we are , it really will feel like the apocalypse , when all we will have is a regular flu season .
However , the protocols this time will be far more deadly .
Last time , the government response rolled out in March – AFTER flu season .
These ‘ safety ’ protocols were delayed and only triggered in March despite governments and health professionals knowing the virus was widely infecting many people around the world as early as October/November .
As I wrote @ @ @ @ @ @ @ impossible to stop a virus 3-5 months AFTER it had circulated the world .
Why wait to inform the world ?
In reality , the health care system was warned in December of this novel disease .
However , if governments had triggered the overreaching and crippling response at the height of Flu season , it would have been obvious that most of the ‘ Cases ’ were really Flu .
The ‘ best laid plan ’ would have died there and then .
Governments were adequately prepared in March though for a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ matter the demographic , political bent or rate of infection , the same plan was triggered worldwide .
I talk about this plan in some detail in my initial research ; Now take a quick look at the UK preparations and read the almost 400 pages of legislation the government dropped two days after they locked down the whole of the UK .
This act came in to force TWO DAYS after lockdown !
However , only FOUR DAYS BEFORE , the UK locked down , it declassified COVID 19 as a High @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID was known to not be deadly enough to justify this definition During the last 6 months though , we have been ‘ conditioned ’ not to compare this deadly pathogen called COVID to little old seasonal flu .
In fact , we have been ‘ conditioned ’ to accept an awful lot that has never been presented before in a pandemic response on a healthy asymptomatic population .
Social Distancing and Isolation from family , friends and co-workers .
Forced use of any old ‘ face coverings ’ or Masks .
Lockdowns @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of an opinion other than that of the Government .
None of these measures have ever been shown to be effective in an ILI pandemic and most ( such as masks from cloth to surgical to N95 ) have proven extremely hazardous to a person ’ s health .
Since when have we ever trusted any government without question ?
All of this ‘ programming ’ helped by our trustworthy , unbiased Main Stream Media ( MSM ) and our Social Engineering wizards determined to know us better than we do ourselves .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ though… they do .
The reality is , as can be seen from the current government , CDC and WHO admissions , COVID on its own was not that deadly .
Over 94 % of people had life threatening co-morbidities ( known all along by the government ) .
Those who made it to a ventilator were given an almost certain death sentence with around 90 % of those dying on that ventilator .
More on that here ( and in my full research paper ) https : //www.linkedin.com/pulse/personal-story-postscript-dave-dickson- There is evidence that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the time the lockdowns started .
Regardless of that though , it is clear that it was the lockdowns themselves that killed in the ‘ off ’ flu season .
For the ‘ faux ’ Second Wave , we won ’ t even need a ‘ novel ’ virus .
The protocols alone will wipe us all out .
Do you want to know what it looks like to run the current protocols our CMO ’ s have mandated worldwide through a flu season ?
Remember Lombardy , Italy ?
They locked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ season in an area that has average flu deaths 600 % greater than the US , every single year .
( https : //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18603552 ) .
Hospitals were rapidly overwhelmed , not by the deaths but by the protocols , which then led to more deaths .
Even Doctors died ( almost all were elderly and had come out of retirement , a fact that was quickly hidden ) .
http : //web.archive.org/web/20200331081803/https : //portale.fnomceo.it/elenco-dei-medici-caduti-nel-corso-dellepidemia-di-covid-19/ ) .
The same pattern happened in New York .
Now take that thought and apply it to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a system already crippled by the last 8 months of insanity .
Now imagine those same lockdown protocols kicking in when 1 billion people start to exhibit symptoms !
Soon you won ’ t have to imagine .
THIS HAS TO STOP NOW .
We have to go back to normal .
No masks , no social distancing , no lockdowns , no vaccine .
One positive to come out of this is the resurgence of research that shows Hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) does not only stop COVID in its tracks , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adenovirus and all coronavirus .
That is in addition to its common use for Rheumatoid Arthritis and Lupus .
This could possibly be the end of not just the COVID vaccines but also flu vaccines and more .
Now can you see why this drug is being vilified .
How the humble Gin & Tonic may save the world from COVID 19 .
Hydroxychloroquine is not just a malaria prophylaxis ; it is an autoimmune therapy also .
However , its use goes beyond both , over its long history and lineage .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ why it works .
• HCQ lowers blood sugar .
This decreases the probability of the infection triggering a cytokine storm , leading to multiple organ failure .
This cytokine storm is a primary killer in most Influenza Like Illnesses ( ILI ) .
• HCQ prevents viral uptake by cells thus making it a highly effective prophylaxis .
• HCQ increases the rate of viral shedding thus reducing the length of time and severity of any viral infection .
• HCQ is effectively used to safely treat autoimmune diseases such as Lupus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ immune suppressant that prevents any ILI virus from triggering a cytokine storm .
Note that other treatments being touted are ineffective and sometimes dangerous .
Take steroids for example , which have been used to treat bacterial pneumonia .
Bacterial pneumonia is common in the ‘ off-flu season ’ .
Were the positive results of steroids really just misdiagnosis of bacterial pneumonia , possibly from mask wearing ?
In influenza caused pneumonia , steroids increase mortality by over 30 % .
Ask yourself why steroids have only just been presented as a cure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We need the right treatment that has always been available .
A treatment that has been stockpiled by governments worldwide in numbers of over 250 million doses donated for free by the manufacturers in March and April specifically to treat COVID .
In Canada alone , that was over 4 million doses .
Where is this critical medication now ?
Why is it being withheld from people ?
Maybe because it is a cheap , off patent drug made by dozens of manufacturers that has very little return on investment as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would remove the need for a COVID vaccine and maybe many other vaccines also ?
It ’ s Time to Right the Crime https : //youtu.be/7j9U4k2LBgs .
Treat the sick , and let ’ s get back to a healthy state of body and mind .
People need to get out and back to work to live , to laugh and to love , before it is too late .
As the media and government fiddles , we are watching Rome burn .
• COVID 19 – Is the lock down working ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tonic may save the world from COVID 19 .
Now back to your regularly scheduled ‘ programming ’ update .
Welcome to Stepford , 1984 style .
How to program a population to accept the ‘ new normal ’ .
Remember to eat your Soylent Greens .
David Dickson is a Consulting C.E.O./C.I.O and owner at DKS DATA About the author : David Dickson is a Consulting C.E.O./C.I.O and owner at DKS DATA .
International Privacy Advocate and Cybersecurity Consultant ( Available for immediate consulting engagements ) PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

The COVID Winter is Coming!
Written by Dave Dickson
We all know the testing is useless. Not fit for purpose and full of false positives. A SARS-COV-2 Lockdown Warning. – Article 7 of 7 (links at the bottom of this article).
So faulty that even AHS, NHS and the CDC (and many others) have publicly stated this. Yet these tests are encouraged (sometimes demanded) and used as an excuse to shut down people’s lives, care homes, businesses and now schools.
This testing has exploded by government decree in recent weeks. As a result, we have all seen the fear mongering, but false, statements of rising infections and ‘hot spots’, ‘outbreaks’ and more. Each one associated with false asymptomatic voluntary testing.
In addition to this use of testing to get people used to more lockdowns, we see any symptom also being used as an excuse to ‘Stay Safe’ when they really mean ‘Stay Scared’. No longer is a cough a symptom of a chest infection. No longer is a runny nose a side effect of air conditioning, seasonal allergy or a cold. All roads lead only to COVID.
Whereas all the other causes of these symptoms have treatments and remedies to prevent them from becoming worse or even deadly, the treatment for COVID is forced isolation and removal of medical care. You either get better or become too sick to be treated. At worst (if you don’t die isolated at home or in a care centre) your fate will be intubated ventilation, only to die in over 90% of ‘Cases’.
But not many people are dying right now. COVID is dying out, isn’t it? Maybe we won’t get a second wave…
Think again about the first paragraphs above.
We are entering flu season. COVID has a symptomatic rate of less than 15% meaning less than 15% of people who apparently contract COVID have any symptoms at all. Flu, on the other hand, has a symptomatic rate (from mild to moderate) of over 90%. In an average year, in the US alone, more than 50 Million people catch one of the many flu’s that circulate. 90% will exhibit symptoms that will be diagnosed as a second wave of COVID.
This is around 45 million people being misdiagnosed with COVID in the next six months. Up to 900,000,000 (900 million) people worldwide will be misdiagnosed with COVID if nothing changes. If that number being flashed on the screen everyday doesn’t scare half the population to death, I don’t know what would.
“Besides future pandemics, the seasonal flu currently infects 1 billion people every year, including 3-5 million severe cases, and causes 290 000 to 650 000 respiratory deaths.”
http://www.emro.who.int/pandemic-epidemic-diseases/news/the-next-flu-pandemic-a-matter-of-when-not-if.html
Up to 1 Billion people worldwide exhibiting symptoms of COVID (when all they have is a cold or the flu). None getting early or appropriate treatment. Add to that the large number of people who will develop COVID symptoms after the vaccine. 100% of people in all vaccine trials have exhibited mild to moderate symptoms. Will they also be misdiagnosed as COVID forcing isolation and lack of even basic care allowing a mild reaction to potentially become deadly?
Add into this the number of potential bacterial respiratory infections from poor mask hygiene and improper mask use. Not to mention the increased impact of viral load uptake caused by rebreathing shedding virus. All this with an immune system devastated by the previous 8 months of fear, lack of care and lack of sunlight.
Will anyone not exhibit some symptom of COVID in the Winter of 2020?
Consider millions or billions of people suddenly being diagnosed with COVID and being locked down martial law style. Arrested if you leave the house or hauled away from your house, work or school for ‘isolation’. Have you seen the ‘free’ society of Australia right now? They have less ‘Cases’ than most provinces in Canada!
Be prepared! We were softened up over the summer for a cull in the winter. This is the culling of society by design. We can no longer put these measures down to ignorance or the perception of caring. Health professionals and governments know what they are doing. Whether our governments or health officials are just afraid to admit it or are too power ‘mad’ to let go is no longer relevant. Barron Munchausen, it is time to leave the building with all your proxies! https://www.uofmhealth.org/health-library/hw180537
Munchausen syndrome by proxy (MSBP) is a mental health problem in which a caregiver makes up or causes an illness or injury in a person under his or her care, such as a child, an elderly adult, or a person who has a disability.
Countries, States and Provinces are using a ‘Cases’ per 100,000 measure to enact stricter lockdowns. These start at around 20 per 100,000 and go up to 100 per 100,000.
In Alberta, an average flu year recently has ranged from 179 to 215 cases per 100,000. That is just lab confirmed hospitalized rates. Now take all the testing strategies being normalized and apply that to a flu season.
“This season there were 7,698 laboratory confirmed influenza cases (179 cases per 100,000 population) reported in Alberta . Last season, there were 9,115 laboratory confirmed influenza cases (215 cases per 100,000 population) reported.”
open.alberta.ca
We will see manufactured ‘Case’ rates in the tens to hundreds of millions worldwide. If we continue to test and report as we are, it really will feel like the apocalypse, when all we will have is a regular flu season.
However, the protocols this time will be far more deadly. Last time, the government response rolled out in March – AFTER flu season. These ‘safety’ protocols were delayed and only triggered in March despite governments and health professionals knowing the virus was widely infecting many people around the world as early as October/November. As I wrote in my original research, it was impossible to stop a virus 3-5 months AFTER it had circulated the world.
Why wait to inform the world? In reality, the health care system was warned in December of this novel disease. However, if governments had triggered the overreaching and crippling response at the height of Flu season, it would have been obvious that most of the ‘Cases’ were really Flu. The ‘best laid plan’ would have died there and then. Governments were adequately prepared in March though for a global shutdown in lock step. No matter the demographic, political bent or rate of infection, the same plan was triggered worldwide. I talk about this plan in some detail in my initial research;
www.researchgate.net
Now take a quick look at the UK preparations and read the almost 400 pages of legislation the government dropped two days after they locked down the whole of the UK.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2020/7/pdfs/ukpga_20200007_en.pdf
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2020/7/notes/division/1/index.htm
This act came in to force TWO DAYS after lockdown! However, only FOUR DAYS BEFORE, the UK locked down, it declassified COVID 19 as a High Consequence Infectious Disease (HCID) because COVID was known to not be deadly enough to justify this definition [link] ;
“…more information is available about mortality rates (low overall) …”
During the last 6 months though, we have been ‘conditioned’ not to compare this deadly pathogen called COVID to little old seasonal flu. In fact, we have been ‘conditioned’ to accept an awful lot that has never been presented before in a pandemic response on a healthy asymptomatic population. Social Distancing and Isolation from family, friends and co-workers. Forced use of any old ‘face coverings’ or Masks. Lockdowns of the healthy and the complete eradication of an opinion other than that of the Government. None of these measures have ever been shown to be effective in an ILI pandemic and most (such as masks from cloth to surgical to N95) have proven extremely hazardous to a person’s health.
Since when have we ever trusted any government without question? All of this ‘programming’ helped by our trustworthy, unbiased Main Stream Media (MSM) and our Social Engineering wizards determined to know us better than we do ourselves. I will let you into a secret though… they do.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341694309_Are_we_the_new_Digital_Soylent_Green
The reality is, as can be seen from the current government, CDC and WHO admissions, COVID on its own was not that deadly. Over 94% of people had life threatening co-morbidities (known all along by the government). Those who made it to a ventilator were given an almost certain death sentence with around 90% of those dying on that ventilator. More on that here (and in my full research paper) https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/personal-story-postscript-dave-dickson- There is evidence that COVID was already on its way out by the time the lockdowns started. Regardless of that though, it is clear that it was the lockdowns themselves that killed in the ‘off’ flu season. For the ‘faux’ Second Wave, we won’t even need a ‘novel’ virus. The protocols alone will wipe us all out.
Do you want to know what it looks like to run the current protocols our CMO’s have mandated worldwide through a flu season? Remember Lombardy, Italy? They locked down during the end of their flu season in an area that has average flu deaths 600% greater than the US, every single year. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18603552). Hospitals were rapidly overwhelmed, not by the deaths but by the protocols, which then led to more deaths. Even Doctors died (almost all were elderly and had come out of retirement, a fact that was quickly hidden). http://web.archive.org/web/20200331081803/https://portale.fnomceo.it/elenco-dei-medici-caduti-nel-corso-dellepidemia-di-covid-19/).
The same pattern happened in New York. Now take that thought and apply it to the beginning of flu season worldwide in a system already crippled by the last 8 months of insanity.
Now imagine those same lockdown protocols kicking in when 1 billion people start to exhibit symptoms! Soon you won’t have to imagine. THIS HAS TO STOP NOW. We have to go back to normal. No masks, no social distancing, no lockdowns, no vaccine.
One positive to come out of this is the resurgence of research that shows Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) does not only stop COVID in its tracks, but it also helps diabetes, influenza, adenovirus and all coronavirus. That is in addition to its common use for Rheumatoid Arthritis and Lupus. This could possibly be the end of not just the COVID vaccines but also flu vaccines and more. Now can you see why this drug is being vilified.
How the humble Gin & Tonic may save the world from COVID 19.
Hydroxychloroquine is not just a malaria prophylaxis; it is an autoimmune therapy also. However, its use goes beyond both, over its long history and lineage. This is just a simple overview of why it works.
HCQ lowers blood sugar. This decreases the probability of the infection triggering a cytokine storm, leading to multiple organ failure. This cytokine storm is a primary killer in most Influenza Like Illnesses (ILI). HCQ prevents viral uptake by cells thus making it a highly effective prophylaxis. HCQ increases the rate of viral shedding thus reducing the length of time and severity of any viral infection. HCQ is effectively used to safely treat autoimmune diseases such as Lupus and Rheumatoid Arthritis. It is an immune suppressant that prevents any ILI virus from triggering a cytokine storm.
Note that other treatments being touted are ineffective and sometimes dangerous. Take steroids for example, which have been used to treat bacterial pneumonia. Bacterial pneumonia is common in the ‘off-flu season’. Were the positive results of steroids really just misdiagnosis of bacterial pneumonia, possibly from mask wearing? In influenza caused pneumonia, steroids increase mortality by over 30%. Ask yourself why steroids have only just been presented as a cure for COVID, right before flu season.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30628-0/fulltext
“As during previous pandemics (severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome), corticosteroids are not routinely recommended and might exacerbate COVID-19-associated lung injury. ”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30917856/
“In patients with influenza pneumonia, corticosteroid use is associated with higher mortality.”
We need the right treatment that has always been available. A treatment that has been stockpiled by governments worldwide in numbers of over 250 million doses donated for free by the manufacturers in March and April specifically to treat COVID. In Canada alone, that was over 4 million doses. Where is this critical medication now? Why is it being withheld from people? Maybe because it is a cheap, off patent drug made by dozens of manufacturers that has very little return on investment as a result. Maybe because its common use would remove the need for a COVID vaccine and maybe many other vaccines also?
It’s Time to Right the Crime https://youtu.be/7j9U4k2LBgs.
Treat the sick, and let’s get back to a healthy state of body and mind.
People need to get out and back to work to live, to laugh and to love, before it is too late.
As the media and government fiddles, we are watching Rome burn.
Complete initial research here:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341713221_The_Best_Laid_Plans_COVID-19_A_SARS-COV-2_Story_A_SARS-CoV-2_Story_P_a_g_e_2_106
Now back to your regularly scheduled ‘programming’ update. Welcome to Stepford, 1984 style. How to program a population to accept the ‘new normal’. Remember to eat your Soylent Greens.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341694309_Are_we_the_new_Digital_Soylent_Green
David Dickson is a Consulting C.E.O./C.I.O and owner at DKS DATA
RT-PCR testing
https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/assets/info/ppih/if-ppih-covid-19-sag-asymptomatic-transmission-rapid-review.pdf
https://bpa-pathology.com/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/
https://youtu.be/kcONxyAJ8S4
https://twitter.com/DrEliDavid/status/1302207447923388416?s=04
Hydroxychloroquine.
A 100% reduction in mortality for a $20 treatment.
https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/early-treatment-of-1061-covid-19-patients-with-hydroxychloroquine-and-azithromycin-marseille-france/
https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/azithroquine_manuscript-soumis.pdf
https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/early-treatment-of-1061-covid-19-patients-with-hydroxychloroquine-and-azithromycin-marseille-france/
https://theconversation.com/blood-sugar-levels-may-influence-vulnerability-to-coronavirus-and-controlling-them-through-conventional-means-might-be-protective-136592
http://www.advbiores.net/article.asp?issn=2277-9175;year=2016;volume=5;issue=1;spage=145;epage=145;aulast=Sheikhbahaie
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-blood-sugar-can-trigger-a-deadly-immune-response-in-the-flu-and-possibly-covid-191/
VA “Study” response. https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Response-to-Magagnoli.pdf
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04332991
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857920300881
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3567830/
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(06)70361-9/fulltext
https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-422X-3-39
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.24.20042366v1.full.pdf
https://crofsblogs.typepad.com/h5n1/2020/01/three-drugs-fairly-effective-on-novel-coronavirus-at-cellular-level.html
http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-01/30/c_138742650.htm
Donated Doses for COVID Treatments
Novartis (130 Million doses), Mylan (50 million doses), Teva (16 million doses), Amneal (20 million doses), Bayer (3 million doses)
https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/new-commitments-mylan-and-teva-move-to-supply-tens-millions-hydroxychloroquine-tablets-to
130 million doses from Novartis
https://www.novartis.com/news/media-releases/novartis-commits-donate-130-million-doses-hydroxychloroquine-support-global-covid-19-pandemic-response
100 Million Doses from Sanofi
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-healt-coronavirus-sanofi-hydroxychlor/sanofi-will-donate-100-million-doses-of-hydroxychloroquine-to-50-countries-idUSKCN21S0JK
HHS Accepts 30 Million DONATED doses for COVID patients.
https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2020/03/29/hhs-accepts-donations-of-medicine-to-strategic-national-stockpile-as-possible-treatments-for-covid-19-patients.html
Jamp Pharma Donating one million of doses
https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/canadian-jamp-pharma-group-gets-involved-donating-one-million-doses-of-hydroxychloroquine-to-hospitals-to-help-combat-covid-19-897524025.html
Apotex donating two million doses
https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/canada-s-apotex-donates-two-million-dosages-of-hydroxychloroquine-to-the-public-health-agency-of-canada-843392095.html
Apotex donating doses for trials
https://everythinggp.com/2020/04/13/hydroxychloroquine-will-be-studied-in-alberta-as-a-possible-covid-19-treatment/
Amneal Pharmaceuticals donates 4.3 million doses
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/international-business/indian-americans-us-pharma-firm-donates-3-4-million-hydroxychloroquine-sulphate-tablets/articleshow/75039058.cms
About the author: David Dickson is a Consulting C.E.O./C.I.O and owner at DKS DATA. International Privacy Advocate and Cybersecurity Consultant (Available for immediate consulting engagements)
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-10--Robert Kennedy Jr: CDC Is A Privately Owned Vaccine Company!

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. claims the CDC owns patents on at least 57 different vaccines , and profits $ 4.1 billion per year in vaccination sales .
According to RFK Jr. , the CDC is not an independent government agency but is actually a subsidiary of Big Pharma .
Greenmedinfo.com reports : Mr. Kennedy told EcoWatch , “ The CDC is a subsidiary of the pharmaceutical industry .
The agency owns more than 20 vaccine patents and purchases and sells $ 4.1 billion in vaccines annually.
” Again , no source .
I have been around long enough to know @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and rechecked .
And since this is a very old claim , one that I would like to be able to state ( if it is true ) , I decided to review it .
I am fortunate to have , as one of my partners in advocacy , fellow autism parent Mark Blaxill , an Intellectual Property expert who has been employed by billion dollar corporations to manage their patents .
Blaxill was the man who found out that HHS , through NIH , owns patents on all HPV vaccines , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ each dose of Gardasil and Cervarix administered anywhere in the world .
He published the stunning revelation in a detailed three part expose entitled , “ A License to Kill ?
Part 1 : How A Public-Private Partnership Made the Government Merck ’ s Gardasil Partner.
” When I contacted Blaxill to ask how to run a patent search , he was kind enough to do it for me .
He found 57 granted US patents with the CDC listed as an assignee .
You can see the search results here .
Upon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ found that one did not seem applicable to vaccination , but merely referenced an article on vaccination .
That leaves us with 56 CDC patents to scrutinize .
Here is what I found .
There are CDC patents applicable to vaccines for Flu , Rotavirus , Hepatitis A , HIV , Anthrax , Rabies , Dengue fever , West Nile virus , Group A Strep , Pneumococcal disease , Meningococcal disease , RSV , Gastroenteritis , Japanese encephalitis , SARS , Rift Valley Fever , and chlamydophila pneumoniae .
There is a CDC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prevention of flavivirus infection , ” which has applications in vaccines for Zika , West Nile virus , Dengue fever , tick-borne encephalitis virus , yellow fever , Palm Creek virus , and Parramatta River virus .
CDC also has several patents for administering various ” shots ” via aerosol delivery systems for vaccines .
There ’ s a CDC patent on a process for vaccine quality control by “ quantifying proteins in a complex preparation of uni- or multivalent commercial or research vaccine preparations.
” There ’ s a CDC patent on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for evaluating the antiretroviral effects of drugs and vaccines.
” CDC has a patent for companies who want to test their respiratory system applicable vaccine on an artificial lung system .
If a vaccine maker is concerned that their vaccine might contain a human rhinovirus , CDC has a patent on a process for determining if such contamination exists .
CDC has a patent on an assay to assist vaccine makers in finding antigen-specific antibodies in a biological sample .
CDC holds a patent that provides vaccine makers with a method of “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by deoptimizing codons.
” Asserting that , “ pathogens with deoptimized codons can be used to increase the phenotypic stability of attenuated vaccines.
” The agency also holds a patent on adjuvants for a vaccine used on premature infants and young babies .
There is a CDC patent to cover a vaccine for an infection induced by a tape worm found in pork .
They even have patents that cover vaccines for animal illnesses including Canarypox virus , Fowlpox virus , Sealpox virus , dog flu and monkey cancer .
Does this seem @ @ @ @ @ @ @ independent ” vaccine recommendations , or a private company with an impressive portfolio to which one might look for investment opportunities ?
The CDC is reputed to be an independent government agency making vaccine recommendations to the public , only for the public good .
They are the agency charged with vaccine safety oversight , via their Immunization Safety Office .
Here is how the office describes its charge : Sound immunization policies affecting children and adults in the U.S. depend on continuous monitoring of the safety and effectiveness of vaccines .
CDC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , to identify health problems possibly related to vaccines , and to conduct studies that help determine whether a health problem is caused by a specific vaccine .
CDC also works with other federal government agencies and other stakeholders to determine the appropriate public health response to vaccine safety concerns and to communicate the benefits and risks of vaccines .
The Immunization Safety Office regularly reports on vaccine safety monitoring findings and any concerns to CDC ’ s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices ( ACIP ) .
This advisory group develops the recommended @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the U.S. ACIP considers the safety and effectiveness of vaccines before making recommendations to the vaccine schedule or changing recommendations for vaccine use.
” Note that they proudly state that they report to the ACIP – the same committee on which Paul Offit infamously served , as if this reporting somehow adds legitimacy to their vaccine safety work .
The same committee that Congress has excoriated for their long history of conflicts of interests .
Nowhere on the CDC ’ s web site can I find the disclosure that the agency is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whom it is supposed to be providing safety oversight .
Mr. Kennedy is in very safe territory by reporting that the CDC has over 20 patents that create vast , undisclosed conflicts of interests in vaccine safety .
He is understating the problem by more than half .
This brief look at current patents held by the CDC deserves an in-depth review to determine exactly what current financial relationships with vaccine makers now exist and what the current impact those revenue streams are likely having on vaccine safety positions .
Furthermore , one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ between the CDC and vaccine makers it is currently courting , to include the potential exploitation of new patents for financial gain .
These are merely a few lines of inquiry , among hundreds , needing to be examined and why the potential RFK commission on vaccine safety must be impaneled .
No wonder the vaccine industry ( and let ’ s not kid ourselves , CDC IS the vaccine industry ) and their media outlets are fighting with such a fury to prevent the # RFKcommission from being formed .
Fortunately , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fight this corruption against our children until his last breath , and we seem to have a new president who doesn ’ t care what Pharma and the mainstream media throw at him .
There is more than 20 years ’ worth of documented abuse and corruption in the vaccine program that , if properly examined , would at the very least force reforms that would drastically reduce the profits of the industry .
The vaccine business is currently a $ 30 billion per year industry in which organizations like the World Health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that it will become a $ 100 billion per year industry by 2025 .
Thus , it is evident that the CDC and their business partners need the public to not only be okay with the 69 doses of recommended childhood vaccines , but to begin to adhere to the additional 100 plus doses of vaccines recommended by the new adult schedule , and to be ready to inject their families with the additional 271 vaccines in the development pipeline .
That profit boom can ’ t happen if the corruption in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ damage that it has done to the health of children ( and now adults ) is laid open for all to finally see .
The $ 30 billion per year industry will become a sub $ 10 billion per year industry , with a cap on how much it can make .
Because there is a cap on how much the human body can process .
We must continue to press the Trump administration for comprehensive vaccine safety review and reform , including the universal right to forgo any and all vaccines without @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ignore CDC ’ s abuses and run interference with the American public , the corrupt vaccine industry may be turning into a paper tiger , and its media simply a powerless crowd of bullies with a megaphone , broadcasting “ sound and fury signifying nothing.
” PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Robert Kennedy Jr: CDC Is A Privately Owned Vaccine Company!
Written by Nwo Report
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. claims the CDC owns patents on at least 57 different vaccines, and profits $4.1 billion per year in vaccination sales.
According to RFK Jr., the CDC is not an independent government agency but is actually a subsidiary of Big Pharma.
Greenmedinfo.com reports: Mr. Kennedy told EcoWatch, “The CDC is a subsidiary of the pharmaceutical industry. The agency owns more than 20 vaccine patents and purchases and sells $4.1 billion in vaccines annually.” Again, no source.
I have been around long enough to know that vaccine claims have to be checked and rechecked. And since this is a very old claim, one that I would like to be able to state (if it is true), I decided to review it.
I am fortunate to have, as one of my partners in advocacy, fellow autism parent Mark Blaxill, an Intellectual Property expert who has been employed by billion dollar corporations to manage their patents. Blaxill was the man who found out that HHS, through NIH, owns patents on all HPV vaccines, and receives a percentage of the profits for each dose of Gardasil and Cervarix administered anywhere in the world.
He published the stunning revelation in a detailed three part expose entitled, “A License to Kill? Part 1: How A Public-Private Partnership Made the Government Merck’s Gardasil Partner.”
When I contacted Blaxill to ask how to run a patent search, he was kind enough to do it for me. He found 57 granted US patents with the CDC listed as an assignee. You can see the search results here.
Upon cursory review of the patents, I found that one did not seem applicable to vaccination, but merely referenced an article on vaccination. That leaves us with 56 CDC patents to scrutinize.
Here is what I found.
There are CDC patents applicable to vaccines for Flu, Rotavirus, Hepatitis A, HIV, Anthrax, Rabies, Dengue fever, West Nile virus, Group A Strep, Pneumococcal disease, Meningococcal disease, RSV, Gastroenteritis, Japanese encephalitis, SARS, Rift Valley Fever, and chlamydophila pneumoniae.
There is a CDC patent for “Nucleic acid vaccines for prevention of flavivirus infection,” which has applications in vaccines for Zika, West Nile virus, Dengue fever, tick-borne encephalitis virus, yellow fever, Palm Creek virus, and Parramatta River virus.
CDC also has several patents for administering various ”shots” via aerosol delivery systems for vaccines.
There’s a CDC patent on a process for vaccine quality control by “quantifying proteins in a complex preparation of uni- or multivalent commercial or research vaccine preparations.”
There’s a CDC patent on a method “for producing a model for evaluating the antiretroviral effects of drugs and vaccines.”
CDC has a patent for companies who want to test their respiratory system applicable vaccine on an artificial lung system.
If a vaccine maker is concerned that their vaccine might contain a human rhinovirus, CDC has a patent on a process for determining if such contamination exists.
CDC has a patent on an assay to assist vaccine makers in finding antigen-specific antibodies in a biological sample.
CDC holds a patent that provides vaccine makers with a method of “reducing the replicative fitness of a pathogen by deoptimizing codons.” Asserting that, “pathogens with deoptimized codons can be used to increase the phenotypic stability of attenuated vaccines.”
The agency also holds a patent on adjuvants for a vaccine used on premature infants and young babies.
There is a CDC patent to cover a vaccine for an infection induced by a tape worm found in pork.
They even have patents that cover vaccines for animal illnesses including Canarypox virus, Fowlpox virus, Sealpox virus, dog flu and monkey cancer.
Does this seem like a public health agency making “independent” vaccine recommendations, or a private company with an impressive portfolio to which one might look for investment opportunities?
The CDC is reputed to be an independent government agency making vaccine recommendations to the public, only for the public good. They are the agency charged with vaccine safety oversight, via their Immunization Safety Office.
Here is how the office describes its charge:
“CDC’s Immunization Safety Office plays a vital role in ensuring our nation’s vaccine safety. Sound immunization policies affecting children and adults in the U.S. depend on continuous monitoring of the safety and effectiveness of vaccines. CDC uses many strategies to assess vaccine safety, to identify health problems possibly related to vaccines, and to conduct studies that help determine whether a health problem is caused by a specific vaccine. CDC also works with other federal government agencies and other stakeholders to determine the appropriate public health response to vaccine safety concerns and to communicate the benefits and risks of vaccines. The Immunization Safety Office regularly reports on vaccine safety monitoring findings and any concerns to CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). This advisory group develops the recommended vaccine schedule for children and adults in the U.S. ACIP considers the safety and effectiveness of vaccines before making recommendations to the vaccine schedule or changing recommendations for vaccine use.”
Note that they proudly state that they report to the ACIP – the same committee on which Paul Offit infamously served, as if this reporting somehow adds legitimacy to their vaccine safety work. The same committee that Congress has excoriated for their long history of conflicts of interests.
Nowhere on the CDC’s web site can I find the disclosure that the agency is a profit partner with the vaccine makers for whom it is supposed to be providing safety oversight.
Mr. Kennedy is in very safe territory by reporting that the CDC has over 20 patents that create vast, undisclosed conflicts of interests in vaccine safety. He is understating the problem by more than half.
This brief look at current patents held by the CDC deserves an in-depth review to determine exactly what current financial relationships with vaccine makers now exist and what the current impact those revenue streams are likely having on vaccine safety positions. Furthermore, one must closely look at the financial relationships between the CDC and vaccine makers it is currently courting, to include the potential exploitation of new patents for financial gain. These are merely a few lines of inquiry, among hundreds, needing to be examined and why the potential RFK commission on vaccine safety must be impaneled.
No wonder the vaccine industry (and let’s not kid ourselves, CDC IS the vaccine industry) and their media outlets are fighting with such a fury to prevent the #RFKcommission from being formed.
Fortunately, Mr. Kennedy has already said he will fight this corruption against our children until his last breath, and we seem to have a new president who doesn’t care what Pharma and the mainstream media throw at him. There is more than 20 years’ worth of documented abuse and corruption in the vaccine program that, if properly examined, would at the very least force reforms that would drastically reduce the profits of the industry.
The vaccine business is currently a $30 billion per year industry in which organizations like the World Health Organization have urged increased investment, projecting that it will become a $100 billion per year industry by 2025. Thus, it is evident that the CDC and their business partners need the public to not only be okay with the 69 doses of recommended childhood vaccines, but to begin to adhere to the additional 100 plus doses of vaccines recommended by the new adult schedule, and to be ready to inject their families with the additional 271 vaccines in the development pipeline.
That profit boom can’t happen if the corruption in the industry, and the vast, unassessed damage that it has done to the health of children (and now adults) is laid open for all to finally see. The $30 billion per year industry will become a sub $10 billion per year industry, with a cap on how much it can make. Because there is a cap on how much the human body can process.
We must continue to press the Trump administration for comprehensive vaccine safety review and reform, including the universal right to forgo any and all vaccines without coercion.
Without a White House to ignore CDC’s abuses and run interference with the American public, the corrupt vaccine industry may be turning into a paper tiger, and its media simply a powerless crowd of bullies with a megaphone, broadcasting “sound and fury signifying nothing.”
Read more at nworeport.me
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-10--‘Green Energy’ Not Very Green After All!

‘ Green Energy ’ Not Very Green After All !
Solar energy is very dilute , so solar collectors usually cover huge areas of flat arable land , stealing farmland , starving wild herbs and grasses of sunlight and creating “ Solar Deserts ” .
Wind turbines steal energy from winds which often bring moisture from the ocean .
These walls of turbines then create rain shadows , producing more rain near the turbines and more droughts down-wind .
Turbines work best along ridge lines where eagles also seek thermals , so birds and bats get chopped up by these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with noise and increase bushfire risk .
They even spread their wall of wind towers offshore , so that less wind and rain even reaches the shore .
Not green at all .
Now green dreamers want to use our precious water to manufacture hydrogen in a round-robin electrolytic process that consumes far more energy than it can ever produce .
Electrolysis consumes nine tonnes of water plus heaps of electricity to make one tonne of hydrogen .
This processed water is not recovered until the hydrogen is burned ( unlike water in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and some escapes to the atmosphere via cooling towers . )
“ In the beginning there was nothing , which exploded.
” Terry Pratchett Hydrogen is a low-energy explosive gas .
Collecting , storing and exporting it will be a hazardous business and producing it will consume scads of Australian water and electricity to generate trendy “ green ” fuel for Asia .
Burning this fuel will release pure Australian water into polluted Asian skies .
But the Australian Government is funding hydrogen speculation with $ 70 million .
Green Energy isn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cost in rare metals ; it creates toxic waste problems ; solar panels create solar deserts ; turbines chop birds and steal wind and rain from inland areas ; and now they want to steal fresh water and energy to export low-energy explosive hydrogen .
In contrast , coal is fossil sunshine .
Burning it releases new energy for industry and its combustion products bring great benefits for the green world – water vapour , carbon dioxide plant food , and valuable plant micro-nutrients .
Why export our sunshine , wind and fresh @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fossil sunshine locked underground as “ politically stranded assets ” ?
All that is not green – it ’ s green stupidity .
Wind farms bring the Egyptian vulture to near-extinction in Andalusia : ttp : //savetheeaglesinternational.org/new/an-extinction-in-progress.html The Australian Renewable Energy Agency ( ARENA ) is set to gift $ 70 million to hydrogen speculators : PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission @ @ @ @ @ @

‘Green Energy’ Not Very Green After All!
Written by Viv Forbes
Solar energy is very dilute, so solar collectors usually cover huge areas of flat arable land, stealing farmland, starving wild herbs and grasses of sunlight and creating “Solar Deserts”.
Wind turbines steal energy from winds which often bring moisture from the ocean. These walls of turbines then create rain shadows, producing more rain near the turbines and more droughts down-wind. Turbines work best along ridge lines where eagles also seek thermals, so birds and bats get chopped up by these whirling scythes. They also annoy neighbours with noise and increase bushfire risk.
They even spread their wall of wind towers offshore, so that less wind and rain even reaches the shore. Not green at all.
Now green dreamers want to use our precious water to manufacture hydrogen in a round-robin electrolytic process that consumes far more energy than it can ever produce.
Electrolysis consumes nine tonnes of water plus heaps of electricity to make one tonne of hydrogen. This processed water is not recovered until the hydrogen is burned (unlike water in steam turbines where most water is reused and some escapes to the atmosphere via cooling towers.)
“In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.”
Terry Pratchett
Hydrogen is a low-energy explosive gas. Collecting, storing and exporting it will be a hazardous business and producing it will consume scads of Australian water and electricity to generate trendy “green” fuel for Asia. Burning this fuel will release pure Australian water into polluted Asian skies. But the Australian Government is funding hydrogen speculation with $70 million.
Green Energy isn’t green. It has a huge cost in rare metals; it creates toxic waste problems; solar panels create solar deserts; turbines chop birds and steal wind and rain from inland areas; and now they want to steal fresh water and energy to export low-energy explosive hydrogen.
In contrast, coal is fossil sunshine. Burning it releases new energy for industry and its combustion products bring great benefits for the green world – water vapour, carbon dioxide plant food, and valuable plant micro-nutrients.
Why export our sunshine, wind and fresh water via hydrogen while leaving our abundant fossil sunshine locked underground as “politically stranded assets”?
All that is not green – it’s green stupidity.
Further Reading
Monumental, Unsustainable Environmental Impacts of Green Energy:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/07/05/monumental-unsustainable-environmental-impacts/
Hydrogen Strategy to nowhere:
https://www.europeanscientist.com/en/energy/hydrogen-strategy-to-nowhere%E2%80%A8/?utm_source=Energy+geopolitics&utm_campaign=fcbaa25021
Wind farms bring the Egyptian vulture to near-extinction in Andalusia:
ttp://savetheeaglesinternational.org/new/an-extinction-in-progress.html
Why Wind Won’t work:
http://carbon-sense.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/why-wind-wont-work.pdf
The Environmental Cost of “Renewable” Energy:
https://carbon-sense.com/2”019/03/25/environmental-cost-of-renewable-energy/
The Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA) is set to gift $70 million to hydrogen speculators:
https://arena.gov.au/news/seven-shortlisted-for-70-million-hydrogen-funding-round/
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-10--The jury is in: Hydroxychloroquine ‘saves lives’ from COVID19

The jury is in : Hydroxychloroquine ‘ saves lives ’ from COVID19 Sky News host Rowan Dean says the jury is in and says categorically “ Hydroxychloroquine saves lives ” and Australians must be given access to the drug .
Mr Dean said Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly , along with his deputy Nick Coatsworth and Labor frontbencher Chris Bowen “ stand condemned ” for their continuous rejections of the drug .
Hydroxychloroquine has been touted by many as a potential treatment to COVID-19 , however Dr Kelly declared to the Australian people it was not effective .
Mr Dean @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clearly , if you look at all the studies … Hydroxychloroquine is consistently effective against COVID-19 when used early and in the right combination with other drugs ” .
“ Paul Kelly stand up tomorrow next to the prime minister and say you are sorry because people are being denied this drug which potentially could save many lives , ” he said .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please @ @ @ @ @ @ @ To Defend The Scientific Method .

The jury is in: Hydroxychloroquine ‘saves lives’ from COVID19
Written by Sky News Australia
Sky News host Rowan Dean says the jury is in and says categorically “Hydroxychloroquine saves lives” and Australians must be given access to the drug. Mr Dean said Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly, along with his deputy Nick Coatsworth and Labor frontbencher Chris Bowen “stand condemned” for their continuous rejections of the drug.
Hydroxychloroquine has been touted by many as a potential treatment to COVID-19, however Dr Kelly declared to the Australian people it was not effective. Mr Dean said:
“the jury says very clearly, if you look at all the studies … Hydroxychloroquine is consistently effective against COVID-19 when used early and in the right combination with other drugs”.
“Paul Kelly stand up tomorrow next to the prime minister and say you are sorry because people are being denied this drug which potentially could save many lives,” he said.
Video at www.youtube.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-10--Globalist Body Fakes Drought Crisis, Refutes UN Climate Science

The World Economic Forum ( WEF ) – a globalist organization comprised of the world ’ s leading political figures , billionaires , and international corporations – published an article today claiming a global drought crisis that is explicitly refuted by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( IPCC ) .
If Twitter , Facebook , and other tech media giants apply their cancel culture rules with any consistency , the tech media giants would quickly erase any mentions of the WEF ’ s fake claims on their platforms .
Today ’ s WEF article is titled , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ resources are set to rise amid climate change.
” The very first sentence of the article reads , “ From erratic rainfall to severe droughts , global warming is increasing competition for water around the world.
” The WEF , however , provides no scientific sources for its claim .
So , let ’ s check what the United Nations IPCC reports regarding rainfall and severe droughts .
As reported in Climate at a Glance : Drought , the U.N. IPCC reports with “ high confidence ” that precipitation has increased over mid-latitude @ @ @ @ @ @ @ including the United States ) during the past 70 years .
Also , the IPCC reports “ low confidence ” about any negative trends globally .
There you have it , in black and white .
The IPCC , the asserted “ gold standard ” for climate science , states explicitly : The rest of the WEF article claims all sorts of worldwide water sob stories , all dependent on the false assertion of less global rainfall and more severe global drought .
The WEF is ramping up the telling of climate lies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they intend to devise a “ Great Reset of global capitalism.
” The plan is to promote global wealth equality by a massive redistribution of wealth from Western democracies to the rest of the world , where a stifling of economic freedom has brought poverty and misery .
The WEF plans to implement this by transforming the world ’ s economies to a socialist New World Order , centered on climate justice .
Telling false climate tales appears to be WEF ’ s main strategy for making this happen .
Regardless of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Reset plans , its claim that climate change is causing less rainfall and more drought is explicitly refuted by the UN IPCC .
Spread the word and the truth… PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Globalist Body Fakes Drought Crisis, Refutes UN Climate Science
Written by James Taylor
The World Economic Forum (WEF) – a globalist organization comprised of the world’s leading political figures, billionaires, and international corporations – published an article today claiming a global drought crisis that is explicitly refuted by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
If Twitter, Facebook, and other tech media giants apply their cancel culture rules with any consistency, the tech media giants would quickly erase any mentions of the WEF’s fake claims on their platforms.
Today’s WEF article is titled, “Water wars: How conflicts over resources are set to rise amid climate change.”
The very first sentence of the article reads, “From erratic rainfall to severe droughts, global warming is increasing competition for water around the world.” The WEF, however, provides no scientific sources for its claim.
So, let’s check what the United Nations IPCC reports regarding rainfall and severe droughts.
As reported in Climate at a Glance: Drought, the U.N. IPCC reports with “high confidence” that precipitation has increased over mid-latitude land areas of the Northern Hemisphere (including the United States) during the past 70 years. Also, the IPCC reports “low confidence” about any negative trends globally.
There you have it, in black and white. The IPCC, the asserted “gold standard” for climate science, states explicitly:
“There is high confidence that mean precipitation over the mid-latitude land areas of the Northern Hemisphere has increased since 1951 (Hartmann et al., 2013). For other latitudinal zones, area-averaged long-term positive or negative trends have low confidence ….”
The rest of the WEF article claims all sorts of worldwide water sob stories, all dependent on the false assertion of less global rainfall and more severe global drought.
The WEF is ramping up the telling of climate lies to justify a January meeting in which they intend to devise a “Great Reset of global capitalism.”
The plan is to promote global wealth equality by a massive redistribution of wealth from Western democracies to the rest of the world, where a stifling of economic freedom has brought poverty and misery.
The WEF plans to implement this by transforming the world’s economies to a socialist New World Order, centered on climate justice. Telling false climate tales appears to be WEF’s main strategy for making this happen.
Regardless of the World Economic Forum’s nefarious Great Reset plans, its claim that climate change is causing less rainfall and more drought is explicitly refuted by the UN IPCC.
Spread the word and the truth…
Read more at Climate Realism
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related