principiascientificinternational--2020-08-05--150,000 Dead Americans & Far More Globally Because Big Pharma Hates HCQ

150,000 Dead Americans & Far More Globally Because Big Pharma Hates HCQ Dr. Zev Zelenko was one of the first front line doctors in America to come out and share his success with using a hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) regimen to treat and cure the China coronavirus .
Back in March Dr. Zelenko treated 699 coronavirus patients with HCQ and Zinc with 100 % success .
Since that time Dr. Fauci , Dr. Birx , the FDA and CDC refused to promote the success of HCQ in treating the disease .
There have been 51 studies that show HCQ is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tuesday Dr. Zelenko joined Steve Bannon and his cohosts on The War Room Pandemic .
Dr. Zev Zelenko told The War Room , “ There are forces that confused the president , that vilified and fear-mongered hydroxychloroquine usage .
And the reason why is they have in the pipeline remdesivir and vaccines that they want to push through .
So , hydroxychloroquine stood in the way of trillions of dollars .
So there are 150,000 dead Americans and many more people around the world simply are dead , because the world listen to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t recommend by the way , are dead simply because of people like Dr. Fauci and the forces behind him… I think the president ’ s instincts are greater than all of his advisors combined and I beg the president to please just follow your instincts .
People are dying because conflicted doctors and fake news reporters are playing politics with HCQ .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please @ @ @ @ @ @ @ To Defend The Scientific Method .

150,000 Dead Americans & Far More Globally Because Big Pharma Hates HCQ
Written by Jim Hoft
Dr. Zev Zelenko was one of the first front line doctors in America to come out and share his success with using a hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) regimen to treat and cure the China coronavirus. Back in March Dr. Zelenko treated 699 coronavirus patients with HCQ and Zinc with 100% success.
Since that time Dr. Fauci, Dr. Birx, the FDA and CDC refused to promote the success of HCQ in treating the disease. There have been 51 studies that show HCQ is effective in treating the coronavirus. On Tuesday Dr. Zelenko joined Steve Bannon and his cohosts on The War Room Pandemic.
Dr. Zev Zelenko told The War Room, “There are forces that confused the president, that vilified and fear-mongered hydroxychloroquine usage. And the reason why is they have in the pipeline remdesivir and vaccines that they want to push through. So, hydroxychloroquine stood in the way of trillions of dollars. So there are 150,000 dead Americans and many more people around the world simply are dead, because the world listen to the FDA, which I don’t recommend by the way, are dead simply because of people like Dr. Fauci and the forces behind him… I think the president’s instincts are greater than all of his advisors combined and I beg the president to please just follow your instincts. Here is the video. People are dying because conflicted doctors and fake news reporters are playing politics with HCQ. Read more at www.thegatewaypundit.com **** PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-05--Discover Why ‘Liar’ Dr Fauci Opposes Hydroxychloroquine

It ’ s getting hotter and hotter in the kitchen and true doctors are fed up with the lies , propaganda , and censorship .
Please read the whole article below but in essence what you must know is that there can only be ONE Emergency Use Authorization ( EUA ) given to a drug or therapeutic .
The FDA revoked EUA for HCQ back in June citing a lack of evidence it worked and that the risks outweighed any potential benefits .
Our ‘ authorities ’ are completely bought out and in bed with Big Pharma so they ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lucrative drug Remdesivir or for their own vaccine rather than give it to HCQ .
DR. MERYL NASS DISCOVERS HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE EXPERIMENTS WERE DESIGNED TO KILL COVID PATIENTS – HOW MANY WERE MURDERED ?
Dr. Meryl Nass has uncovered a hornet ’ s nest of government sponsored Hydroxychloroquine experiments that were designed to kill severely ill , Covid-19 hospitalized patients .
On June 14th Dr. Nass first identified two Covid-19 experiments in which massive , high toxic doses – four times higher than safe of hydroxychloroquine were being given to severely ill hospitalized patients @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being conducted by the World Health Organization , on 3500 Covid-19 patients at 400 hospitals , across 35 countries .
The trial was suspended following the fraudulent Surgisphere report in The Lancet that claimed 35 % higher death rates in patients receiving Hydroxychloroquine .
But when The Lancet retracted the report , the WHO resumed the Solidarity trial .
More than 100 countries expressed interest in participating in the trial .
• experiment used very similar doses .
It was sponsored by the Wellcome Trust ( GlaxoSmithKline ) and the Bill and Melinda @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The experiment was conducted at Oxford University , on 1,542 patients of these 396 patients ( 25.7 % ) who were in the high dose Hydroxychloroquine arm , died .
They have done everything in their power to discredit this safe and inexpensive drug : madisonarealymesupportgroup.com It is well known that HCQ works best WITH zinc – which ‘ authorities ’ purposely leave out of the studies .
They also use dosages that could kill a horse .
Government employees paid with our tax dollars are allowed to have patents and financial conflicts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sore-spot in the Lyme world for decades as they purposely rigged testing for vaccine development – that they own patents on .
Then they malign any treatment that competes with their own : madisonarealymesupportgroup.com Regarding COVID-19 , these same people have done the same thing again .
They also have been in bed with Gilead Sciences for decades and Gilead manufacturers Remdesivir – a direct competitor to HCQ .
Remdesivir is extremely expensive and not backed by resultsmadisonarealymesupportgroup.com But that doesn ’ t stop Fauci , along with the media , from making @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supported .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Discover Why ‘Liar’ Dr Fauci Opposes Hydroxychloroquine
Written by Alicia Cashman
It’s getting hotter and hotter in the kitchen and true doctors are fed up with the lies, propaganda, and censorship.
Please read the whole article below but in essence what you must know is that there can only be ONE Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) given to a drug or therapeutic.
The FDA revoked EUA for HCQ back in June citing a lack of evidence it worked and that the risks outweighed any potential benefits. Our ‘authorities’ are completely bought out and in bed with Big Pharma so they’ve held out EUA for their own lucrative drug Remdesivir or for their own vaccine rather than give it to HCQ.
DR. MERYL NASS DISCOVERS HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE EXPERIMENTS WERE DESIGNED TO KILL COVID PATIENTS – HOW MANY WERE MURDERED?
Dr. Meryl Nass has uncovered a hornet’s nest of government sponsored Hydroxychloroquine experiments that were designed to kill severely ill, Covid-19 hospitalized patients. On June 14th Dr. Nass first identified two Covid-19 experiments in which massive, high toxic doses – four times higher than safe of hydroxychloroquine were being given to severely ill hospitalized patients in intensive care units.
Solidarity was being conducted by the World Health Organization, on 3500 Covid-19 patients at 400 hospitals, across 35 countries. The trial was suspended following the fraudulent Surgisphere report in The Lancet that claimed 35% higher death rates in patients receiving Hydroxychloroquine. But when The Lancet retracted the report, the WHO resumed the Solidarity trial. More than 100 countries expressed interest in participating in the trial.
was being conducted by the on 3500 Covid-19 patients at 400 hospitals, across 35 countries. The trial was suspended following the fraudulent Surgisphere report in The Lancet that claimed 35% higher death rates in patients receiving Hydroxychloroquine. But when The Lancet retracted the report, the WHO resumed the Solidarity trial. More than 100 countries expressed interest in participating in the trial. Recovery experiment used very similar doses. It was sponsored by the Wellcome Trust (GlaxoSmithKline) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the UK government. The experiment was conducted at Oxford University, on 1,542 patients of these 396 patients (25.7%) who were in the high dose Hydroxychloroquine arm, died.
They have done everything in their power to discredit this safe and inexpensive drug: madisonarealymesupportgroup.com
It is well known that HCQ works best WITH zinc – which ‘authorities’ purposely leave out of the studies. They also use dosages that could kill a horse.
Government employees paid with our tax dollars are allowed to have patents and financial conflicts of interest. This has been a sore-spot in the Lyme world for decades as they purposely rigged testing for vaccine development – that they own patents on. Then they malign any treatment that competes with their own: madisonarealymesupportgroup.com
Regarding COVID-19, these same people have done the same thing again. They also have been in bed with Gilead Sciences for decades and Gilead manufacturers Remdesivir – a direct competitor to HCQ. Remdesivir is extremely expensive and not backed by resultsmadisonarealymesupportgroup.com
see also;madisonarealymesupportgroup.com
But that doesn’t stop Fauci, along with the media, from making public statements that cannot be scientifically supported.
Read more at madisonarealymesupportgroup.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-05--Pharma Panic! MODERNA’s CEO & CMO Liquidate their Shares

As Moderna begins a late-stage trial of its coronavirus vaccine , chief medical officer Tal Zaks sold almost all his shares in the company , according to a report filed to the US Securities and Exchange Commission , raising concerns about his trust in the vaccine , according to Globes .
While Zaks and other Moderna officials have already been cashing out on shares for the past few months , they ’ ve increased the sales of shares since reports were published on a successful test of the vaccine earlier in July .
In general , when stakeholders believe in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in order to increase confidence in the market .
The move by Moderna officials to do the opposite raised concerns about the company , especially considering that Zaks , who sold almost all of his shares , is on the scientific side of the company , according to Globes .
Zaks still has tens of thousands of dollars worth of options in the company .
CEO Stéphane Bancel has also cashed out on shares in recent months .
Share sales by CEO Stéphane Bancel , his children ’ s ’ trust and companies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ million between January 1 and June 26 .
Seven executive-compensation experts told Reuters that share liquidations by Moderna executives show the incentives biotech executives have to highlight development milestones , even for drugs that often don ’ t get approved or sold .
Such optimistic statements could cause investors to overpay for company shares or create false hope concerning a possible coronavirus vaccine .
Uncertainty remains concerning how effective a vaccine will be in fighting the coronavirus , as it is still unclear how long one can remain immune to the virus .

Pharma Panic! MODERNA’s CEO & CMO Liquidate their Shares
Written by The Jerusalem Post
As Moderna begins a late-stage trial of its coronavirus vaccine, chief medical officer Tal Zaks sold almost all his shares in the company, according to a report filed to the US Securities and Exchange Commission, raising concerns about his trust in the vaccine, according to Globes.
While Zaks and other Moderna officials have already been cashing out on shares for the past few months, they’ve increased the sales of shares since reports were published on a successful test of the vaccine earlier in July.
In general, when stakeholders believe in their product, they increase their shares in order to increase confidence in the market. The move by Moderna officials to do the opposite raised concerns about the company, especially considering that Zaks, who sold almost all of his shares, is on the scientific side of the company, according to Globes.
Zaks still has tens of thousands of dollars worth of options in the company.
CEO Stéphane Bancel has also cashed out on shares in recent months.
Share sales by CEO Stéphane Bancel, his children’s’ trust and companies he owns amount to about $21 million between January 1 and June 26.
Seven executive-compensation experts told Reuters that share liquidations by Moderna executives show the incentives biotech executives have to highlight development milestones, even for drugs that often don’t get approved or sold. Such optimistic statements could cause investors to overpay for company shares or create false hope concerning a possible coronavirus vaccine.
“This may be their one shot at making a boatload of money if the vaccine doesn’t work out,” said Jesse Fried, a Harvard Law School professor who wrote a book about executive compensation, adding that Moderna’s chiefs have a powerful motivation to “keep the stock price up.”
Uncertainty remains concerning how effective a vaccine will be in fighting the coronavirus, as it is still unclear how long one can remain immune to the virus.
Read more at www.jpost.com
****
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-05--Study Used by Dr. Fauci to Condemn Hydroxychloroquine Debunked!

Study Used by Dr. Fauci to Condemn Hydroxychloroquine Debunked !
Dr. Fauci recently used another reported study to debunk the use of hydroxychloroquine as a viable treatment to save the lives of individuals sick with the China coronavirus .
But an expert ’ s review of the report shows that the study actually confirms that hydroxychloroquine saves lives not the opposite .
Dr. Fauci shared the following about the drug hydroxychloroquine last week in front of Congress : Fauci insists that the only research that he considers credible , that he sees as the gold standard for COVID-19 research , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is placebo controlled .
Dr. Fauci explains the absence of such proof causes him to dismiss numerous studies ( observational , or with a non randomized control group ) .
Fauci claims there is no such study using a placebo that proves the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine .
But like many statements by the NIAID Director , this is also false .
In fact on Friday night esteemed Dr. Ramin Oskoui blasted Dr. Fauci for lying by omission .
Fauci is neither consistent or honest in his reporting on the hydroxychloroquine studies .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ study that proves hydroxychloroquine does save lives if used in the early stage of someone getting sick with the coronavirus .
Despite over 1,000 clinical trials seeking a cure for COVID-19 , there has been little effort to test early hydroxychloroquine-based treatments for COVID-19 .
Many trials are in hospital settings , i.e .
beyond the approx .
5 day window for early treatment to be effective .
In addition , from an ethical viewpoint , best practices for clinical trials prevent from using placebos when a treatment is known to work .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ a key for randomized clinical trials , is incompatible with both the Hippocratic Oath and the internationally approved ethical principles for clinical trials , embedded in the Helsinki Declaration .
The study by McGill and the University of Minnesota was the first randomized controlled trial testing hydroxychloroquine in a non-hospital setting , and was therefore much awaited by the research community and decision makers from all over the world .
The McGill / Minnesota studies , which were focusing on non-hospitalized individuals , many of them healthcare workers , were published in academic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Medicine and the Annals of Internal Medicine .
Both studies concluded on the ineffectiveness of hydroxychloroquine .
The first study concluded : “ hydroxychloroquine did not prevent illness compatible with Covid-19 or confirmed infection , ” while the second stated : “ Hydroxychloroquine did not substantially reduce symptom severity in outpatients with early , mild COVID-19.
” Of course for some odd reason the mainstream media celebrated the initial results of the study for some sick reason and Dr. Fauci used it to condemn the use of HCQ as a viable medicine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ For the record , Dr. David Boulware , the first name mentioned in the study has links with the pharmaceutical giant Gilead , that he did not divulge in the study .
This has since been unveiled on Twitter .
A statistician in Brazil unwound the data in the study and found that the report actually proves the medicine hydroxychloroquine saves lives !
And then came Marcio Watanabe , PhD and his article “ Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine as Prophylaxis for Covid-19.
” found on Cornell University arXiv.org e-print ( non peer reviewed ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ July 18 and last revised on July 21 .
Marcio Watanabe is an adjunct professor of statistical sciences at the federal university of Fluminense in Brazil .
He undertook a detailed statistical analysis of the June 3 article by Boulware et al , using what he considers a better methodology , and came up with very different conclusions .
“ We conclude their randomized , double-blind , placebo-controlled trial presents statistical evidence , at 99 % confidence level , that the treatment of Covid-19 patients with hydroxychloroquine is effective in reducing the appearance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ after exposure to the virus.
” “ For 0 to 2 days after exposure to virus , the estimated relative reduction in symptomatic outcomes is 72 % after 0 days , 48.9 % after 1 day and 29.3 % after 2 days.
” “ We conclude that , when applied as a prophylaxis , it can significantly reduce the relative proportion of symptomatic patients if used from 0 to 2 days after exposure to the virus ( 71.98 % for 0 days , 48.86 % for 1 day and 29.33 % for 2 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our results show that the elapsed time between the exposure to the virus and the beginning of treatment is vital to the effectiveness of the antiviral use.
” “ We expect the treatment will be more effective when applied to patients in the viral replication period , before viral load reaches its peak which occurs around 5 days after symptom onset.
” The paper also discusses “ some inaccuracies in the statistical analysis of Boulware et al.
” These results were submitted on June 24th by Marcio Watanabe to the New England Journal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ later , the journal has not yet published the correction , which invalidates the key conclusion of Boulware et al that hydroxychloroquine does not work for early treatment .
The Gateway Pundit reached out to The New England Journal of Medicine to inquire why this very important analysis by Marcio Watanabe has not been addressed or published .
We will include any update if/when we hear back from the NEJM .
Fauci does not practice real medicine these days , yet he was talking daily with Chris Cuomo when the CNN anchor was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cuomo took Cinchona bark extracts , an analog of hydroxychloroquine , to cure himself from COVID-19 , as discussed in this other article : http : //covexit.com/cnn-chris-cuomo-takes-hydroxychloroquine-analog-for-covid-19/ .
Deep State doctors are doing all they can to distort the truth about hydroxychloroquine .
Does it have anything to do with money or power ?
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend @ @ @ @

Study Used by Dr. Fauci to Condemn Hydroxychloroquine Debunked!
Written by Joe Hoft
Dr. Fauci recently used another reported study to debunk the use of hydroxychloroquine as a viable treatment to save the lives of individuals sick with the China coronavirus.
But an expert’s review of the report shows that the study actually confirms that hydroxychloroquine saves lives not the opposite. Dr. Fauci shared the following about the drug hydroxychloroquine last week in front of Congress:
Fauci insists that the only research that he considers credible, that he sees as the gold standard for COVID-19 research, is research that uses randomized data and is placebo controlled. Dr. Fauci explains the absence of such proof causes him to dismiss numerous studies (observational, or with a non randomized control group).
Fauci claims there is no such study using a placebo that proves the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine. But like many statements by the NIAID Director, this is also false.
In fact on Friday night esteemed Dr. Ramin Oskoui blasted Dr. Fauci for lying by omission. Fauci is neither consistent or honest in his reporting on the hydroxychloroquine studies.
The Gateway Pundit reported recently on one particular study that proves hydroxychloroquine does save lives if used in the early stage of someone getting sick with the coronavirus.
The website Covexit.com reported:
Despite over 1,000 clinical trials seeking a cure for COVID-19, there has been little effort to test early hydroxychloroquine-based treatments for COVID-19. Many trials are in hospital settings, i.e. beyond the approx. 5 day window for early treatment to be effective. In addition, from an ethical viewpoint, best practices for clinical trials prevent from using placebos when a treatment is known to work. The use of placebos, which is a key for randomized clinical trials, is incompatible with both the Hippocratic Oath and the internationally approved ethical principles for clinical trials, embedded in the Helsinki Declaration. The study by McGill and the University of Minnesota was the first randomized controlled trial testing hydroxychloroquine in a non-hospital setting, and was therefore much awaited by the research community and decision makers from all over the world.
The studies were published:
The McGill / Minnesota studies, which were focusing on non-hospitalized individuals, many of them healthcare workers, were published in academic journals, respectively the New England Journal of Medicine and the Annals of Internal Medicine. Both studies concluded on the ineffectiveness of hydroxychloroquine. The first study concluded: “hydroxychloroquine did not prevent illness compatible with Covid-19 or confirmed infection,” while the second stated: “Hydroxychloroquine did not substantially reduce symptom severity in outpatients with early, mild COVID-19.” https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2016638 https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-4207 (The Universities of Alberta and Manitoba were also involved in the study.) https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT04308668?view=record
Of course for some odd reason the mainstream media celebrated the initial results of the study for some sick reason and Dr. Fauci used it to condemn the use of HCQ as a viable medicine to use on China coronavirus patients.
For the record, Dr. David Boulware, the first name mentioned in the study has links with the pharmaceutical giant Gilead, that he did not divulge in the study. This has since been unveiled on Twitter.
Then this happened.
A statistician in Brazil unwound the data in the study and found that the report actually proves the medicine hydroxychloroquine saves lives!
And then came Marcio Watanabe, PhD and his article “Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine as Prophylaxis for Covid-19.” found on Cornell University arXiv.org e-print (non peer reviewed) site. The article was published on July 18 and last revised on July 21. Marcio Watanabe is an adjunct professor of statistical sciences at the federal university of Fluminense in Brazil. He undertook a detailed statistical analysis of the June 3 article by Boulware et al, using what he considers a better methodology, and came up with very different conclusions.
A chart shows his results:
“We conclude their randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial presents statistical evidence, at 99% confidence level, that the treatment of Covid-19 patients with hydroxychloroquine is effective in reducing the appearance of symptoms if used before or right after exposure to the virus.” “For 0 to 2 days after exposure to virus, the estimated relative reduction in symptomatic outcomes is 72% after 0 days, 48.9% after 1 day and 29.3% after 2 days.” “We conclude that, when applied as a prophylaxis, it can significantly reduce the relative proportion of symptomatic patients if used from 0 to 2 days after exposure to the virus (71.98% for 0 days, 48.86% for 1 day and 29.33% for 2 days).” “Moreover, our results show that the elapsed time between the exposure to the virus and the beginning of treatment is vital to the effectiveness of the antiviral use.” “We expect the treatment will be more effective when applied to patients in the viral replication period, before viral load reaches its peak which occurs around 5 days after symptom onset.” The paper also discusses “some inaccuracies in the statistical analysis of Boulware et al.” https://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.09477.pdf
These results were submitted on June 24th by Marcio Watanabe to the New England Journal of Medicine, yet, five weeks later, the journal has not yet published the correction, which invalidates the key conclusion of Boulware et al that hydroxychloroquine does not work for early treatment.
The Gateway Pundit reached out to The New England Journal of Medicine to inquire why this very important analysis by Marcio Watanabe has not been addressed or published.
We will include any update if/when we hear back from the NEJM.
Fauci does not practice real medicine these days, yet he was talking daily with Chris Cuomo when the CNN anchor was struggling against the disease. Incidentally, Cuomo took Cinchona bark extracts, an analog of hydroxychloroquine, to cure himself from COVID-19, as discussed in this other article: http://covexit.com/cnn-chris-cuomo-takes-hydroxychloroquine-analog-for-covid-19/.
Deep State doctors are doing all they can to distort the truth about hydroxychloroquine. Does it have anything to do with money or power?
Read more at www.thegatewaypundit.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-05--FDA Grants Big Pharma 100% Immunity

FDA Grants Big Pharma 100% Immunity

A senior executive from AstraZeneca , Britain ’ s second-largest pharmaceutical manufacturer , told Reuters that his company was just @ @ @ @ @ action .
Key parts of the clinical trials are being skipped as big pharma will @ @ @ @ @ adverse side effects for administering the experimental COVID-19 drugs .
In America the US Food @ @ @ @ @ ) already has a law called the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness ( PREP ) @ @ @ @ @ to vaccine companies if something goes wrong .
Remember , they still haven ’ t @ @ @ @ @ be effective for the 2003 SARS virus after 17 years .
What makes you think @ @ @ @ @ vaccine that is both effective and safe for COVID-19 ?
People need to wake up @ @ @ @ @ and mass genocide .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a @ @ @ @ @ .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE @ @ @ @ @ Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

FDA Grants Big Pharma 100% Immunity
Written by Nancy Morgan Hart
A senior executive from AstraZeneca, Britain’s second-largest pharmaceutical manufacturer, told Reuters that his company was just granted protection from all legal action.
Key parts of the clinical trials are being skipped as big pharma will not be held accountable for adverse side effects for administering the experimental COVID-19 drugs.
In America the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) already has a law called the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, which provides immunity to vaccine companies if something goes wrong.
Remember, they still haven’t found a vaccine which could be effective for the 2003 SARS virus after 17 years. What makes you think they can rush through a vaccine that is both effective and safe for COVID-19? People need to wake up to this wanton criminal fraud and mass genocide.
Nancy Morgan Hart https://headlineswithavoice.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-06--Molecular forces: The surprising stretching behavior of DNA

When large forces , for example in bridge construction , act on a heavy beam , the beam will be slightly deformed .
Calculating the relationship between forces , internal stresses and deformations is one of the standard tasks in civil engineering .
But what happens when you apply these considerations to tiny objects — for example , to a single DNA double helix ?
Experiments with DNA molecules show that their mechanical properties are completely different from what those of macroscopic objects — and this has important consequences for biology and medicine .
Scientists at TU Wien ( Vienna @ @ @ @ @ @ @ properties in detail by combining ideas from civil engineering and physics .
At first glance , you might think of the DNA double helix as a tiny little spring that you can simply stretch and compress just like you would an ordinary spring .
But it is not quite that simple : “ If you stretch a piece of DNA , you would actually expect the number of turns to decrease .
But in certain cases the opposite is true : “ When the helix gets longer , it sometimes twists even more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the Institute of Mechanics of Materials and Structures at TU Wien .
“ Apart from that , DNA molecules are much more ductile than the materials we usually deal with in civil engineering : They can become 70 % longer under tensile stress.
” These strange mechanical properties of DNA are of great importance for biology and medicine : “ When the genetic information is read from the DNA molecule in a living cell , the details of the geometry can determine whether a reading error occurs , which in the worst @ @ @ @ @ @ @ says Johannes Kalliauer .
“ Until now , molecular biology has had to be satisfied with empirical methods to explain the relationship between forces and the geometry of DNA.
” In his dissertation , Johannes Kalliauer got to the bottom of this issue — and he did so in the form of a rather unusual combination of subjects : His work was supervised on the one hand by the civil engineer Prof. Christian Hellmich , and on the other hand by Prof. Gerhard Kahl from the Institute of Theoretical Physics .
“ We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ DNA molecule on an atomic scale on the computer , ” explains Kalliauer .
“ You determine how the DNA helices are compressed , stretched or twisted — and then you calculate the forces that occur and the final position of the atoms.
” Such calculations are very complex and only possible with the help of large supercomputers — Johannes Kalliauer used the Vienna Scientific Cluster ( VSC ) for this purpose .
That way , the strange experimental findings could be explaned — such as the counterintuitive result that in certain cases @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ It ’ s hard to imagine on a large scale , but at the atomic level it all makes sense , ” says Johannes Kalliauer .
Within the atomic models of theoretical physics , interatomic forces and distances can be determined .
Using certain rules developed by the team based on principles from civil engineering , the relevant force quantities required to describe the DNA strand as a whole can then be determined — similar to the way the statics of a beam in civil engineering can be described using some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ working in an interesting intermediate world here , between the microscopic and the macroscopic , ” says Johannes Kalliauer .
“ The special thing about this research project is that you really need both perspectives and you have to combine them.
” This combination of significantly different size scales plays a central role at the Institute for Mechanics of Materials and Structures time and again .
After all , the material properties that we feel every day on a large scale are always determined by behaviour at the micro level .
The current @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the “ Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids , ” is intended to show on the one hand how to combine the large and the small in a scientifically exact way , and on the other hand to help to better understand the behaviour of DNA — right down to the explanation of hereditary diseases .

Written by Vienna University of Technology
When large forces, for example in bridge construction, act on a heavy beam, the beam will be slightly deformed. Calculating the relationship between forces, internal stresses and deformations is one of the standard tasks in civil engineering. But what happens when you apply these considerations to tiny objects — for example, to a single DNA double helix?
Experiments with DNA molecules show that their mechanical properties are completely different from what those of macroscopic objects — and this has important consequences for biology and medicine. Scientists at TU Wien (Vienna) has now succeeded in explaining these properties in detail by combining ideas from civil engineering and physics.
Unexpected behaviour at the molecular level
At first glance, you might think of the DNA double helix as a tiny little spring that you can simply stretch and compress just like you would an ordinary spring. But it is not quite that simple: “If you stretch a piece of DNA, you would actually expect the number of turns to decrease. But in certain cases the opposite is true: “When the helix gets longer, it sometimes twists even more,” says civil engineer Johannes Kalliauer from the Institute of Mechanics of Materials and Structures at TU Wien. “Apart from that, DNA molecules are much more ductile than the materials we usually deal with in civil engineering: They can become 70% longer under tensile stress.”
These strange mechanical properties of DNA are of great importance for biology and medicine: “When the genetic information is read from the DNA molecule in a living cell, the details of the geometry can determine whether a reading error occurs, which in the worst case can even cause cancer,” says Johannes Kalliauer. “Until now, molecular biology has had to be satisfied with empirical methods to explain the relationship between forces and the geometry of DNA.”
In his dissertation, Johannes Kalliauer got to the bottom of this issue — and he did so in the form of a rather unusual combination of subjects: His work was supervised on the one hand by the civil engineer Prof. Christian Hellmich, and on the other hand by Prof. Gerhard Kahl from the Institute of Theoretical Physics.
“We used molecular dynamics methods to reproduce the DNA molecule on an atomic scale on the computer,” explains Kalliauer. “You determine how the DNA helices are compressed, stretched or twisted — and then you calculate the forces that occur and the final position of the atoms.” Such calculations are very complex and only possible with the help of large supercomputers — Johannes Kalliauer used the Vienna Scientific Cluster (VSC) for this purpose.
That way, the strange experimental findings could be explaned — such as the counterintuitive result that in certain cases the DNA twists even more when stretched. “It’s hard to imagine on a large scale, but at the atomic level it all makes sense,” says Johannes Kalliauer.
Strange intermediate world
Within the atomic models of theoretical physics, interatomic forces and distances can be determined. Using certain rules developed by the team based on principles from civil engineering, the relevant force quantities required to describe the DNA strand as a whole can then be determined — similar to the way the statics of a beam in civil engineering can be described using some important cross-sectional properties.
“We are working in an interesting intermediate world here, between the microscopic and the macroscopic,” says Johannes Kalliauer. “The special thing about this research project is that you really need both perspectives and you have to combine them.”
This combination of significantly different size scales plays a central role at the Institute for Mechanics of Materials and Structures time and again. After all, the material properties that we feel every day on a large scale are always determined by behaviour at the micro level. The current work, which has now been published in the “Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids,” is intended to show on the one hand how to combine the large and the small in a scientifically exact way, and on the other hand to help to better understand the behaviour of DNA — right down to the explanation of hereditary diseases.


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-06--What Global Warming? Snow Line In Alps Increases

It ’ s been a rather cool summer in much of Europe so far .
And just before some hot weather is about to sweep across Central Europe starting tomorrow , winter made a brief comeback – at the peak of summer – in the Alps !
“ At high altitudes of the Alps , the precipitation turned into snow overnight , ” reported Wetteronline.de here .
“ In some areas , the snowfall line dropped to an altitude of around 2,300 meters.
” Wetteronline.de also noted that on Germany ’ s highest mountain , Zugspitze , “ about 30 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ morning at minus 2 degrees.
” “ Employees of the Zugspitzbahn were in continuous operation to clear paths and the visitor platforms from the summer snow masses.
” Meanwhile , Germany ’ s DWD national weather service recently issued what I ’ d call a press release that is designed especially for stupid and lazy journalists who won ’ t bother fact-checking .
In its preliminary report on July weather in Germany , the DWD announced that the mid-summer month this year was “ rather warm.
” According to the DWD , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 17.7°C ( 64°F ) , which was “ 0.8°C ( 1.44°F ) above the value for the internationally valid reference period 1961 to 1990.
” But what the DWD fails to tell us is that the 1961-1990 period was a cold one .
And not only that , the World Meteorological Organization ( WMO ) no longer uses the 1961-1990 reference period .
Instead , it uses the 1981-2010 period to calculate the means .
The DWD does mention that July 2020 was 0.3°C ( 0.54°F ) too cold compared with the valid @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the DWD , 0.3°C below the valid mean is in their eyes “ rather warm.
” Read more at No Tricks Zone PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

What Global Warming? Snow Line In Alps Increases
Written by Pierre Gosselin
It’s been a rather cool summer in much of Europe so far. And just before some hot weather is about to sweep across Central Europe starting tomorrow, winter made a brief comeback – at the peak of summer – in the Alps!
Snow down to 2300 meters
“At high altitudes of the Alps, the precipitation turned into snow overnight,” reported Wetteronline.de here. “In some areas, the snowfall line dropped to an altitude of around 2,300 meters.”
A foot of snow
Wetteronline.de also noted that on Germany’s highest mountain, Zugspitze, “about 30 centimeters of fresh snow fell in the morning at minus 2 degrees.”
“Employees of the Zugspitzbahn were in continuous operation to clear paths and the visitor platforms from the summer snow masses.”
DWD national weather service labels a cooler than normal July “quite warm”
Meanwhile, Germany’s DWD national weather service recently issued what I’d call a press release that is designed especially for stupid and lazy journalists who won’t bother fact-checking.
In its preliminary report on July weather in Germany, the DWD announced that the mid-summer month this year was “rather warm.”
According to the DWD, the average temperature in July for Germany was 17.7°C (64°F), which was “0.8°C (1.44°F) above the value for the internationally valid reference period 1961 to 1990.”
But what the DWD fails to tell us is that the 1961-1990 period was a cold one. And not only that, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) no longer uses the 1961-1990 reference period. Instead, it uses the 1981-2010 period to calculate the means.
The DWD does mention that July 2020 was 0.3°C (0.54°F) too cold compared with the valid reference period 1981 to 2010. So at the DWD, 0.3°C below the valid mean is in their eyes “rather warm.”
Read more at No Tricks Zone
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-06--Mycotoxins: The Hidden Hormone Danger In Our Food Supply

Mycotoxins : The Hidden Hormone Danger In Our Food Supply Over 30 years ago , scientists observed mycotoxin contaminated animal @ @ @ @ @ with normal sexual development in young female pigs , resulting in estrogenic syndromes and precocious @ @ @ @ @ research in the U.S. is confirms that the contamination of our food supply with fungal @ @ @ @ @ sexual development of young girls .
Grains , once considered the foundation of the USDA @ @ @ @ @ ” ( and still a key component of its updated “ food plate ” ) @ @ @ @ @ scrutiny due to their purported evolutionary incompatibility ( e.g .
Paleo and/or ancestral diets ) @ @ @ @ @ and agricultural corporations ( e.g .
Monsanto/Bayer ’ s Franken-Corn ) , as well as @ @ @ @ @ to “ sugar ” within the body , to name but a few of a @ @ @ @ @

Mycotoxins: The Hidden Hormone Danger In Our Food Supply
Written by Sayer Ji
Over 30 years ago, scientists observed mycotoxin contaminated animal feed (grains) interfering with normal sexual development in young female pigs, resulting in estrogenic syndromes and precocious puberty. More recent human research in the U.S. is confirms that the contamination of our food supply with fungal toxins is adversely affecting the sexual development of young girls.
Grains, once considered the foundation of the USDA’s “food pyramid” (and still a key component of its updated “food plate”), have recently come under scrutiny due to their purported evolutionary incompatibility (e.g. Paleo and/or ancestral diets), their co-option by biotech and agricultural corporations (e.g. Monsanto/Bayer’s Franken-Corn), as well as the fact that they convert to “sugar” within the body, to name but a few of a growing list of concerns.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-06--Graphene Filtration: A revolution in Desalination technology!

Recently , a group of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology researchers made a major breakthrough in the graphene based @ @ @ @ @ able to remove 97 % of common salts in an energy efficient way .
The @ @ @ @ @ is energy intensive , and desalination plants ’ capital costs are high .
By the @ @ @ @ @ of the world ’ s population will experience water scarcity , which makes this discovery @ @ @ @ @ graphene-based filtration technology could come to your kitchen very soon .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , @ @ @ @ @ as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street @ @ @ @ @ Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Graphene Filtration: A revolution in Desalination technology!
Written by Learn Engineering
Recently, a group of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology researchers made a major breakthrough in the graphene based desalination process. They were able to remove 97% of common salts in an energy efficient way.
The current reverse osmosis desalination technology is energy intensive, and desalination plants’ capital costs are high.
By the year 2025, 14% of the world’s population will experience water scarcity, which makes this discovery very important. Moreover, graphene-based filtration technology could come to your kitchen very soon.
More at www.nature.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-06--Lethal Injection: The Story Of Vaccination

Part 1 The definitive look into the history of vaccination .
From cancer , to autism , to the purposeful @ @ @ @ @ the globe , find out why all of these things are perfectly legal according to @ @ @ @ @ government considers you no different than cattle in their own law .
This video is @ @ @ @ @ permission is needed to copy , reproduce , and give away this video and information @ @ @ @ @ SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes @ @ @ @ @ Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit @ @ @ @ @ Method .

Lethal Injection: The Story Of Vaccination
Written by Clint Richardson
Part 1 The definitive look into the history of vaccination. From cancer, to autism, to the purposeful sterilization of innocent people around the globe, find out why all of these things are perfectly legal according to U.S. CODE – why the government considers you no different than cattle in their own law.
This video is public domain, and no permission is needed to copy, reproduce, and give away this video and information. – Clint Richardson
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related