principiascientificinternational--2020-03-28--Study:  Sunlight Levels Are Inversely Correlated with Virus Infections

Image ( Wikipedia ) A low-pressure mercury-vapor discharge tube floods the inside of a biosafety cabinet with shortwave UV light when not in use , sterilizing microbiological contaminants from irradiated surfaces .
Despite what mainstream media may tell you , it is scientifically proven that viruses hate sunlight .
Studies in the peer reviewed scientific literature attest to the fact that ultra-violet ( UV ) light can kill bacteria and viruses .
Indeed , hospitals and surgeries are increasingly employing UV lamps to disinfect and prevent flu-type viruses ( including COVID19 ) from spreading .
In this article we introduce @ @ @ @ @ @ @ process of using light as a disinfectant is not new at all .
Devices were first developed in the mid 20th Century and the process is widely termed Ultraviolet germicidal irradiation ( UVGI ) .
The process relies on short-wavelength ultraviolet ( UV-C ) light to kill or inactivate microorganisms and is used in a variety of applications , such as food , air , and water purification .
But despite being around 70 years or so , the system had little proven application for use against viruses – until 2017 .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the subject in the Journal of Infectious Diseases ( February 2020 ) and titled , ’ The Influence of Simulated Sunlight on the Inactivation of Influenza Virus in Aerosols.
’ [ 1 ] It reported as follows : Environmental parameters , including sunlight levels , are known to affect the survival of many microorganisms in aerosols .
However , the impact of sunlight on the survival of influenza virus in aerosols has not been previously quantified .
The present study examined the influence of simulated sunlight on the survival of influenza virus in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ % relative humidity using an environmentally controlled rotating drum aerosol chamber .
Measured decay rates were dependent on the level of simulated sunlight , but they were not significantly different between the 2 relative humidity levels tested .
In darkness , the average decay constant was 0.02 ± 0.06 min−1 , equivalent to a half-life of 31.6 minutes .
However , at full intensity simulated sunlight , the mean decay constant was 0.29 ± 0.09 min−1 , equivalent to a half-life of approximately 2.4 minutes .
These results are consistent with epidemiological findings @ @ @ @ @ @ @ influenza transmission , and they can be used to better understand the potential for the virus to spread under varied environmental conditions .
An excellent article showing developments in commercial devices using UV to kill viruses came in February 2018 with ‘ This UV Lamp Could Prevent the Flu Virus From Spreading in Public Places ’ ( Amanda MacMillan ) .
[ 2 ] “ Researchers have developed an ultraviolet ( UV ) lamp that kills the influenza virus but isn ’ t harmful to human skin or eyes , according to a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hope the technology can be commercialized and marketed to prevent the spread of seasonal flu in public places , such as schools , hospitals , and airports .
“ We ’ ve known for a century that UV light is extremely efficient at killing microbes , bacteria , and viruses , ” says study leader David Brenner , director of the Center for Radiological Research at Columbia University Irving Medical Center .
For that reason , UV devices are often used for sterilization — for medical equipment in hospitals , for example , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Brenner explained that the problem with conventional germicidal lamps was that prolonged exposure to humans could cause skin cancer and cataracts in the eyes .
Brenner says , “ You can sterilize a hospital room , but not when anyone ’ s inside.
” To get round this problem the Columbia team came up with a solution .
They used light on the far end of the UV-C spectrum , known as far-UVC , which has very short wavelengths .
What they found was that far-UVC can penetrate and destroy microscopic bacteria and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ through the protective outer layers of human skin or eyes .
Brenner and his colleagues proved that UVC light can effectively kill airborne influenza .
In their new study , aerosolized particles of the H1N1 seasonal flu virus were released into a test chamber and exposed to very low doses of far-UVC light .
Their ‘ softer ’ light treatment was shown to be as effective as conventional germicidal UV light .
As the COVID19 pandemic drives interest in a whole range of personal health safeguards from clinical masks , sanitizer gels , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are looking to invest in products which use safe UV to sterilize their homes and businesses .
shoplightsanitizer.com claim their product will “ sterilize everything within reach ” and that “ 20 seconds of light is all that is needed.
” “ In 1878 , Arthur Downes and Thomas P. Blunt published a paper describing the sterilization of bacteria exposed to short-wavelength light .
[ 3 ] UV has been a known mutagen at the cellular level for over 100 years .
UVGI can be used to disinfect air with prolonged exposure .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ and time .
For this reason , it is not as effective on moving air , or when the lamp is perpendicular to the flow , as exposure times are dramatically reduced .
ASHRAE covers UVGI and its applications in indoor air quality and building maintenance in “ Ultraviolet Lamp Systems ” , Chapter 16 of its 2008 Handbook , HVAC Systems and Equipment .
Its 2011 Handbook , HVAC Applications , covers “ Ultraviolet air and surface treatment ” in Chapter 60 .
UVGI is often used to disinfect equipment such as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and other devices .
Lab personnel also disinfect glassware and plasticware this way .
Microbiology laboratories use UVGI to disinfect surfaces inside biological safety cabinets ( “ hoods ” ) between uses.
” [ 1 ] see : https : //academic.oup.com/jid/article-abstract/221/3/372/5645407 ?
redirectedFrom=fulltext The Influence of Simulated Sunlight on the Inactivation of Influenza Virus in Aerosols , Michael Schuit , Sierra Gardner , Stewart Wood , Kristin Bower , Greg Williams , Denise Freeburger , Paul Dabisch , The Journal of Infectious Diseases , Volume 221 , Issue 3 , 1 February 2020 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ [ 2 ] see : https : //time.com/5142211/uv-light-kills-flu-virus/ , ’ This UV Lamp Could Prevent the Flu Virus From Spreading in Public Places ’ , Amanda MacMillan , Time Magazine , ( February 9 , 2018 ) PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Study: Sunlight Levels Are Inversely Correlated with Virus Infections
Written by John O'Sullivan
Image (Wikipedia) A low-pressure mercury-vapor discharge tube floods the inside of a biosafety cabinet with shortwave UV light when not in use, sterilizing microbiological contaminants from irradiated surfaces.
Despite what mainstream media may tell you, it is scientifically proven that viruses hate sunlight. Studies in the peer reviewed scientific literature attest to the fact that ultra-violet (UV) light can kill bacteria and viruses.
Indeed, hospitals and surgeries are increasingly employing UV lamps to disinfect and prevent flu-type viruses (including COVID19) from spreading. In this article we introduce some of the key evidence.
The process of using light as a disinfectant is not new at all. Devices were first developed in the mid 20th Century and the process is widely termed Ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI).
The process relies on short-wavelength ultraviolet (UV-C) light to kill or inactivate microorganisms and is used in a variety of applications, such as food, air, and water purification. But despite being around 70 years or so, the system had little proven application for use against viruses – until 2017.
The most up to date study appears on the subject in the Journal of Infectious Diseases (February 2020) and titled,’ The Influence of Simulated Sunlight on the Inactivation of Influenza Virus in Aerosols.’ [1]
It reported as follows:
Abstract
Background Environmental parameters, including sunlight levels, are known to affect the survival of many microorganisms in aerosols. However, the impact of sunlight on the survival of influenza virus in aerosols has not been previously quantified. Methods The present study examined the influence of simulated sunlight on the survival of influenza virus in aerosols at both 20{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} and 70{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} relative humidity using an environmentally controlled rotating drum aerosol chamber. Results Measured decay rates were dependent on the level of simulated sunlight, but they were not significantly different between the 2 relative humidity levels tested. In darkness, the average decay constant was 0.02 ± 0.06 min−1, equivalent to a half-life of 31.6 minutes. However, at full intensity simulated sunlight, the mean decay constant was 0.29 ± 0.09 min−1, equivalent to a half-life of approximately 2.4 minutes. Conclusions These results are consistent with epidemiological findings that sunlight levels are inversely correlated with influenza transmission, and they can be used to better understand the potential for the virus to spread under varied environmental conditions. An excellent article showing developments in commercial devices using UV to kill viruses came in February 2018 with ‘This UV Lamp Could Prevent the Flu Virus From Spreading in Public Places’ (Amanda MacMillan). [2] MacMillan wrote: “Researchers have developed an ultraviolet (UV) lamp that kills the influenza virus but isn’t harmful to human skin or eyes, according to a new study in Scientific Reports. They hope the technology can be commercialized and marketed to prevent the spread of seasonal flu in public places, such as schools, hospitals, and airports. “We’ve known for a century that UV light is extremely efficient at killing microbes, bacteria, and viruses,” says study leader David Brenner, director of the Center for Radiological Research at Columbia University Irving Medical Center. For that reason, UV devices are often used for sterilization — for medical equipment in hospitals, for example, or drinking water for backcountry campers.” Brenner explained that the problem with conventional germicidal lamps was that prolonged exposure to humans could cause skin cancer and cataracts in the eyes. Brenner says, “You can sterilize a hospital room, but not when anyone’s inside.” See video: To get round this problem the Columbia team came up with a solution. They used light on the far end of the UV-C spectrum, known as far-UVC, which has very short wavelengths. What they found was that far-UVC can penetrate and destroy microscopic bacteria and viruses, but can’t travel through the protective outer layers of human skin or eyes. Brenner and his colleagues proved that UVC light can effectively kill airborne influenza. In their new study, aerosolized particles of the H1N1 seasonal flu virus were released into a test chamber and exposed to very low doses of far-UVC light. Their ‘softer’ light treatment was shown to be as effective as conventional germicidal UV light. As the COVID19 pandemic drives interest in a whole range of personal health safeguards from clinical masks, sanitizer gels, more hand washing, etc. consumers are looking to invest in products which use safe UV to sterilize their homes and businesses. shoplightsanitizer.com claim their product will “sterilize everything within reach” and that “20 seconds of light is all that is needed.” According to Wikipedia: “In 1878, Arthur Downes and Thomas P. Blunt published a paper describing the sterilization of bacteria exposed to short-wavelength light.[3] UV has been a known mutagen at the cellular level for over 100 years. Air disinfection UVGI can be used to disinfect air with prolonged exposure. Disinfection is a function of UV intensity and time. For this reason, it is not as effective on moving air, or when the lamp is perpendicular to the flow, as exposure times are dramatically reduced. ASHRAE covers UVGI and its applications in indoor air quality and building maintenance in “Ultraviolet Lamp Systems”, Chapter 16 of its 2008 Handbook, HVAC Systems and Equipment. Its 2011 Handbook, HVAC Applications, covers “Ultraviolet air and surface treatment” in Chapter 60. Laboratory hygiene UVGI is often used to disinfect equipment such as safety goggles, instruments, pipettors, and other devices. Lab personnel also disinfect glassware and plasticware this way. Microbiology laboratories use UVGI to disinfect surfaces inside biological safety cabinets (“hoods”) between uses.”
[1] see: https://academic.oup.com/jid/article-abstract/221/3/372/5645407?redirectedFrom=fulltext The Influence of Simulated Sunlight on the Inactivation of Influenza Virus in Aerosols, Michael Schuit, Sierra Gardner, Stewart Wood, Kristin Bower, Greg Williams, Denise Freeburger, Paul Dabisch, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Volume 221, Issue 3, 1 February 2020, Pages 372–378, https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiz582
[2] see: https://time.com/5142211/uv-light-kills-flu-virus/,’This UV Lamp Could Prevent the Flu Virus From Spreading in Public Places’, Amanda MacMillan, Time Magazine, (February 9, 2018)
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-03-28--Turning Climate Change Upside Down

Turning Climate Change Upside Down

Take everything you think of climate change and turn it upside down .
The variations in heating , cooling , and CO2 concentration in the atmosphere come from below .
Of emphasis here is the very real , minuscule uptick in CO2 which does not come from radiation sources .
Of course , CO2 has nothing to do with global warming .
It only feeds the plants .
I argue such points about geothermal heat and my obsession about Herndon ’ s Georeactor as well as the uniform observation from ice cores and past epochs that the uptick in CO2 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : http : //nuclearplanet.com/ The latest work on Antarctic ice cores were taken by French glaciologists and , allowing for degassing from glacial compression , yields a lag period of 200 years — say , the duration from the end of the Little Ice Age to the current time .
The French glaciologists took their ice core observations in the deep interior of Antarctica in what is the largest , most arid region ( desert ) of the world .
With minimal snow , the ice sheets of Antarctica ’ s interior form @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from multiple subglacial volcanoes , trenches , canyons , and subglacial lakes .
Researchers from Washington University ( St. Louis ) describe the bottom of the Bentley Subglacial Trench as a “ magma blow torch ” .
Recall that the Warmists dismiss observations of the Medieval Warming Period , claiming that the warming was largely confined to the Northern Hemisphere .
The Dust Bowl of the 1930s was also an event peculiar to North America .
In a way , the Warmists are correct about the variations in warming confined to the Northern @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , like a blind squirrel , can find a nut every now and then .
Logically , the internal heat of the Earth transmits pretty uniformly thru the crust and continental land masses , notably in the land masses of the Northern Hemisphere .
The boreholes measurements of Davies & Davies ( 2010 , 2013 ) indicate a fairly uniform temperature profile — on land .
The work of Davies & Davies took no observations in the Arctic Ocean , Antarctica , Greenland , nor deep ocean waters .
Very few boreholes were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and continental shelves .
Any heat dissipated into the ocean waters is less observable , yet the temperature differential ( driving force ) is greatest for the heat transmitted from the crust into the oceans .
Moreover , the Earth is a globe .
The lithosphere ( crust ) is thickest around the Equator and thinnest around the landless North Pole — closest to the Earth ’ s heat engine .
Antarctica ’ s atmosphere and surrounding ocean water is largely isolated due to the powerful , relentless circumpolar winds , which also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ indeed , prior heating and cooling eras were driven by the Arctic regions and the mostly dramatic effects were observed in the Northern Hemisphere .
The Arctic has the Gakkel Ridge ( varying 3 to 5 km below sea level ) , multiple CO2-emitting submarine volcanoes , as well as the Laptev Rift in the Laptev Sea .
The result , during reduced activity in the GeoReactor ( a Soliton Breeder Reactor ) , were the great ice sheets which descended across North America , Europe , and Siberia during the Ice Ages @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Milankovitch cycles , and imaginary “ CO2 forcing ” are relatively uniform at any given point in time and should not be considered dominant .
Again , we have experienced a measurable uptick in CO2 concentration .
The inbound radiation heat sources are controlled by phase change in low level clouds .
Condensation of water vapor to rain and rain freezing to snow .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Turning Climate Change Upside Down
Written by Richard F Cronin
image source: filmblerg.com
Take everything you think of climate change and turn it upside down. The variations in heating, cooling, and CO2 concentration in the atmosphere come from below.
Of emphasis here is the very real, minuscule uptick in CO2 which does not come from radiation sources. Of course, CO2 has nothing to do with global warming. It only feeds the plants.
I argue such points about geothermal heat and my obsession about Herndon’s Georeactor as well as the uniform observation from ice cores and past epochs that the uptick in CO2 lags the uptick in heat. See: http://nuclearplanet.com/
The latest work on Antarctic ice cores were taken by French glaciologists and, allowing for degassing from glacial compression, yields a lag period of 200 years — say, the duration from the end of the Little Ice Age to the current time.
The French glaciologists took their ice core observations in the deep interior of Antarctica in what is the largest, most arid region (desert) of the world. With minimal snow, the ice sheets of Antarctica’s interior form from below due to the steam emitted from multiple subglacial volcanoes, trenches, canyons, and subglacial lakes. Researchers from Washington University (St. Louis) describe the bottom of the Bentley Subglacial Trench as a “magma blow torch”.
See: https://www.scientificamerican .com/article/ice-core-data- help-solve/
Recall that the Warmists dismiss observations of the Medieval Warming Period, claiming that the warming was largely confined to the Northern Hemisphere. The Dust Bowl of the 1930s was also an event peculiar to North America.
In a way, the Warmists are correct about the variations in warming confined to the Northern Hemisphere. Even the litigious Mickey Mann, like a blind squirrel, can find a nut every now and then.
See: https://www.meteo.psu.edu/holo cene/public_html/shared/articl es/medclimopt.pdf
Logically, the internal heat of the Earth transmits pretty uniformly thru the crust and continental land masses, notably in the land masses of the Northern Hemisphere. The boreholes measurements of Davies & Davies (2010, 2013) indicate a fairly uniform temperature profile — on land.
The work of Davies & Davies took no observations in the Arctic Ocean, Antarctica, Greenland, nor deep ocean waters. Very few boreholes were taken in northern Canada, Siberia, and continental shelves. Any heat dissipated into the ocean waters is less observable, yet the temperature differential ( driving force) is greatest for the heat transmitted from the crust into the oceans.
See: https://www.solid-earth.net/1/ 5/2010/se-1-5-2010.pdf
See: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ggg e.20271
Moreover, the Earth is a globe. The lithosphere (crust) is thickest around the Equator and thinnest around the landless North Pole — closest to the Earth’s heat engine. Antarctica’s atmosphere and surrounding ocean water is largely isolated due to the powerful, relentless circumpolar winds, which also drive the Antarctic current.
So, indeed, prior heating and cooling eras were driven by the Arctic regions and the mostly dramatic effects were observed in the Northern Hemisphere.
The Arctic has the Gakkel Ridge ( varying 3 to 5 km below sea level), multiple CO2-emitting submarine volcanoes, as well as the Laptev Rift in the Laptev Sea.
The result, during reduced activity in the GeoReactor (a Soliton Breeder Reactor), were the great ice sheets which descended across North America, Europe, and Siberia during the Ice Ages.
Any heating attributed to solar, Milankovitch cycles, and imaginary “CO2 forcing” are relatively uniform at any given point in time and should not be considered dominant. Again, we have experienced a measurable uptick in CO2 concentration. The inbound radiation heat sources are controlled by phase change in low level clouds. Condensation of water vapor to rain and rain freezing to snow.
See: https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.001 65
Emphasis:
“This is the reason why IPCC has to use a very large sensitivity to compensate a too small natural component. Further, they have to leave out the strong negative feedback due to the clouds in order to magnify the sensitivity. In addition, this paper proves that the changes in the low cloud cover fraction practically control the global temperature.” The heating/cooling variations emanating from the Arctic are the dominant, relevant phenomena. See: https://principia-scientific.o rg/climate-change-earths-inter nal-heat-flux-and-localized- hot-spots/ See: https://principia-scientific.o rg/naturally-occurring-fission -plate-climatology-and-the- georeactor/
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-03-31--NY hospitals treating coronavirus patients with vitamin C

Seriously sick coronavirus patients in New York state ’ s largest hospital system are being given massive doses of vitamin C — based on promising reports that it ’ s helped people in hard-hit China , The Post has learned .
Dr. Andrew G. Weber , a pulmonologist and critical-care specialist affiliated with two Northwell Health facilities on Long Island , said his intensive-care patients with the coronavirus immediately receive 1,500 milligrams of intravenous vitamin C. Identical amounts of the powerful antioxidant are then readministered three or four times a day , he said .
Each dose is more than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s daily recommended dietary allowance of vitamin C , which is just 90 milligrams for adult men and 75 milligrams for adult women .
The regimen is based on experimental treatments administered to people with the coronavirus in Shanghai , China , Weber said .
“ The patients who received vitamin C did significantly better than those who did not get vitamin C , ” he said .
“ It helps a tremendous amount , but it is not highlighted because it ’ s not a sexy drug.
” A spokesman for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ including Lenox Hill Hospital on Manhattan ’ s Upper East Side — said vitamin C was being “ widely used ” as a coronavirus treatment throughout the system , but noted that medication protocols varied from patient to patient .
About 700 patients are being treated for coronavirus across the hospital network , Molinet said , but it ’ s unclear how many are getting the vitamin C treatment .
The vitamin C is administered in addition to such medicines as the anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine , the antibiotic azithromycin , various biologics and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Tuesday , New York hospitals have federal permission to give a cocktail of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin to desperately ill patients on a “ compassionate care ” basis .
President Trump has tweeted that the unproven combination therapy has “ a real chance to be one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine.
” Weber , 34 , said vitamin C levels in coronavirus patients drop dramatically when they suffer sepsis , an inflammatory response that occurs when their bodies overreact to the infection .
“ It makes all the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ maintain this level of vitamin C , ” he said .
A clinical trial on the effectiveness of intravenous vitamin C on coronavirus patients began Feb. 14 at Zhongnan Hospital in Wuhan , China , the epicenter of the pandemic .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

NY hospitals treating coronavirus patients with vitamin C
Written by Lorena Mongelli and Bruce Golding
Seriously sick coronavirus patients in New York state’s largest hospital system are being given massive doses of vitamin C — based on promising reports that it’s helped people in hard-hit China, The Post has learned.
Dr. Andrew G. Weber, a pulmonologist and critical-care specialist affiliated with two Northwell Health facilities on Long Island, said his intensive-care patients with the coronavirus immediately receive 1,500 milligrams of intravenous vitamin C.
Identical amounts of the powerful antioxidant are then readministered three or four times a day, he said.
Each dose is more than 16 times the National Institutes of Health’s daily recommended dietary allowance of vitamin C, which is just 90 milligrams for adult men and 75 milligrams for adult women.
The regimen is based on experimental treatments administered to people with the coronavirus in Shanghai, China, Weber said.
“The patients who received vitamin C did significantly better than those who did not get vitamin C,” he said.
“It helps a tremendous amount, but it is not highlighted because it’s not a sexy drug.”
A spokesman for Northwell — which operates 23 hospitals, including Lenox Hill Hospital on Manhattan’s Upper East Side — said vitamin C was being “widely used” as a coronavirus treatment throughout the system, but noted that medication protocols varied from patient to patient.
“As the clinician decides,” spokesman Jason Molinet said.
About 700 patients are being treated for coronavirus across the hospital network, Molinet said, but it’s unclear how many are getting the vitamin C treatment.
The vitamin C is administered in addition to such medicines as the anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine, the antibiotic azithromycin, various biologics and blood thinners, Weber said.
As of Tuesday, New York hospitals have federal permission to give a cocktail of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin to desperately ill patients on a “compassionate care” basis.
President Trump has tweeted that the unproven combination therapy has “a real chance to be one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine.”
Weber, 34, said vitamin C levels in coronavirus patients drop dramatically when they suffer sepsis, an inflammatory response that occurs when their bodies overreact to the infection.
“It makes all the sense in the world to try and maintain this level of vitamin C,” he said.
A clinical trial on the effectiveness of intravenous vitamin C on coronavirus patients began Feb. 14 at Zhongnan Hospital in Wuhan, China, the epicenter of the pandemic.
Read more at nypost.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-03-31--We’ve been had, and Trump knows it

We’ve been had, and Trump knows it

We ’ ve been had , and Trump knows it While President Trump closed the U.S. border against entry from China at the end of January , his overall instinct was right .
The CCP virus was nasty , but no worse than a supercharged flu .
Health professionals overwhelmed Trump and his inner circle with doomsday scenarios , bullied by panic-obsessed virologists and epidemiologists — begging for attention and copying the alarmist playbook from the climate/global warming extremists , allied with the MSM Trump-haters .
And now the government has completely suffocated economic demand , creating a depression , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , livelihoods , families , and fortunes for a generation .
It is becoming apparent that the end-of-the-world predictions , computer models warning of an apocalyptic black plague worldwide , are all wrong .
Those paying attention were warned that the worse-case scenarios were hysterical , by the likes of Stanford epidemiologist John P.A .
Ioannidis .
In dramatic fashion , U.K. Imperial College scientist Neil Ferguson published a doomsday scenario on March 16 .
Now , just ten days later , he has reversed his outlook , essentially settling on a prediction @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Most telling , the two U.S. public health icons , Drs Fauci and Birx , are both saying the extreme models that provoked extreme measures bear little resemblance to the actual data on the ground .
From the New England Journal of Medicine March 26 co-authored by Fauci : This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza ( which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1 % ) or a pandemic influenza ( similar to those in 1957 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ similar to SARS or MERS , which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10 % and 36 % , respectively .
Birx , speaking at a White House press briefing , singled out a recent study on the United Kingdom that originally predicted 500,000 people would die from the virus and has since been revised down to predict 20,000 deaths in the U.K. She said the data the government has collected does not show that 20 percent of the U.S. population would be infected with COVID-19 , cautioning against predictions that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ talking about 20 percent of a population getting infected , it is very scary but we don ’ t have data that matches that based on the experience , ” Birx said .
“ There ’ s no … reality on the ground where we can see that 60 to 70 percent of Americans are going to get infected in the next eight to 12 weeks , ” Birx later continued .
Perhaps Trump had no other option than to go with the flow when this crisis unfolded .
But he is not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was elected because he is a contrarian .
His contrarian antennae have already sent signals that he must reset the economy , pronto .
Trump wants America to reopen by Easter .
Despite his ambition being ridiculed and criticized , he ’ s right to pivot from hysteria to rebound .
About the author : Geoffrey P. Hunt is a retired senior executive of a global industrial firm .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street @ @ @ @ @ @ @ TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

We’ve been had, and Trump knows it
Written by Geoffrey P. Hunt
While President Trump closed the U.S. border against entry from China at the end of January, his overall instinct was right. The CCP virus was nasty, but no worse than a supercharged flu.
Health professionals overwhelmed Trump and his inner circle with doomsday scenarios, bullied by panic-obsessed virologists and epidemiologists — begging for attention and copying the alarmist playbook from the climate/global warming extremists, allied with the MSM Trump-haters.
And now the government has completely suffocated economic demand, creating a depression, an unnecessary calamity that is destroying lives, livelihoods, families, and fortunes for a generation. It is becoming apparent that the end-of-the-world predictions, computer models warning of an apocalyptic black plague worldwide, are all wrong.
Those paying attention were warned that the worse-case scenarios were hysterical, by the likes of Stanford epidemiologist John P.A. Ioannidis.
In dramatic fashion, U.K. Imperial College scientist Neil Ferguson published a doomsday scenario on March 16. Now, just ten days later, he has reversed his outlook, essentially settling on a prediction no worse than a bad flu season.
Most telling, the two U.S. public health icons, Drs Fauci and Birx, are both saying the extreme models that provoked extreme measures bear little resemblance to the actual data on the ground. From the New England Journal of Medicine March 26 co-authored by Fauci:
This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} and 36{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}, respectively.
Re: Dr. Birx from The Hill:
Birx, speaking at a White House press briefing, singled out a recent study on the United Kingdom that originally predicted 500,000 people would die from the virus and has since been revised down to predict 20,000 deaths in the U.K. She said the data the government has collected does not show that 20 percent of the U.S. population would be infected with COVID-19, cautioning against predictions that say so. “When people start talking about 20 percent of a population getting infected, it is very scary but we don’t have data that matches that based on the experience,” Birx said. “There’s no … reality on the ground where we can see that 60 to 70 percent of Americans are going to get infected in the next eight to 12 weeks,” Birx later continued.
Perhaps Trump had no other option than to go with the flow when this crisis unfolded. But he is not usually a slave to consensus. He was elected because he is a contrarian. His contrarian antennae have already sent signals that he must reset the economy, pronto.
Trump wants America to reopen by Easter. Despite his ambition being ridiculed and criticized, he’s right to pivot from hysteria to rebound.
About the author: Geoffrey P. Hunt is a retired senior executive of a global industrial firm.
Read more at www.americanthinker.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-03-31--Pandemic Historian: Coronavirus ‘a Disease of Globalization’

The Chinese coronavirus “ is emphatically a disease of globalization , ” a pandemic historian at Yale University says .
In an interview published in the Wall Street Journal , Yale University ’ s Frank Snowden — a historian who most recently in 2006 published a book about Italy ’ s eradication of malaria — details how the coronavirus pandemic is threatening the globalist worldview of free movement of people and free trade .
The interview finds the Journal ‘ s Jason Willick seemingly admits the coronavirus is tainting globalism and pushing Americans and the peoples of Europe toward nationhood @ @ @ @ @ @ @ plague saw power move up from villages and city-states to national capitals , the coronavirus is encouraging a devolution of authority from supranational units to the nation-state .
This is most obvious in the European Union , where member states are setting their own responses .
Open borders within the EU have been closed , and some countries have restricted export of medical supplies .
The virus has heightened tensions between the U.S. and China , as Beijing tries to protect its image and Americans worry about access to medical supply chains .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Journal the coronavirus is a direct result of the globalization of the American economy after nearly four decades of free trade policy initiatives : The coronavirus is threatening “ the economic and political sinews of globalization , and causing them to unravel to a certain degree , ” Mr. Snowden says .
He notes that “ coronavirus is emphatically a disease of globalization.
” The virus is striking hardest in cities that are “ densely populated and linked by rapid air travel , by movements of tourists , of refugees , all kinds @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interlocking networks.
” [ Emphasis added ] Globalization , Snowden notes , has driven the coronavirus to majorly impact the wealthiest of Americans .
“ Respiratory viruses , Mr. Snowden says , tend to be socially indiscriminate in whom they infect .
Yet because of its origins in the vectors of globalization , the coronavirus appears to have affected the elite in a high-profile way , ” the Journal piece states .
“ From Tom Hanks to Boris Johnson , people who travel frequently or are in touch with travelers have been among @ @ @ @ @ @ @ infection of thousands of the nation ’ s rich and upper-middle-class has driven class warfare in regions like the Hamptons in New York where some of the wealthiest , most liberal celebrities own property .
A report by Maureen Callahan for the New York Post chronicles how the working class staff of the Hamptons ’ elite are turning on them as those infected disregard rules and Center for Disease Control ( CDC ) guidelines : “ There ’ s not a vegetable to be found in this town right now , ” says @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pocket of East Hampton .
“ It ’ s these elitist people who think they don ’ t have to follow the rules.
” [ Emphasis added ] It ’ s not just the drastic food shortage out here .
Every aspect of life , most crucially medical care , is under strain from the sudden influx of rich Manhattanites panic-fleeing … — and in some cases , knowingly bringing coronavirus .
[ Emphasis added ] “ We ’ re at the end of Long Island , the tip , and waves of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ says lifelong Montauker James Katsipis .
“ We should blow up the bridges .
Don ’ t let them in.
” [ Emphasis added ] While globalization has delivered soaring profits for corporate executives , working- and middle-class American communities have been left behind to grapple with fewer jobs , less industry , stagnant wages , and increase competition in the labor market due to decades-long mass legal immigration .
Since 2001 , free trade with China has cost millions of Americans their jobs .
For example , the Economic Policy Institute has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about 3.4 million U.S. jobs were lost due to the nation ’ s trade deficit with China .
Of the 3.4 million U.S. jobs lost in that time period , about 2.6 million were lost in the manufacturing industry , making up about three-fourths of the loss of jobs from the U.S.-Chinese trade deficit .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To @ @ @ @ @

Pandemic Historian: Coronavirus ‘a Disease of Globalization’
Written by John Binder
The Chinese coronavirus “is emphatically a disease of globalization,” a pandemic historian at Yale University says.
In an interview published in the Wall Street Journal, Yale University’s Frank Snowden — a historian who most recently in 2006 published a book about Italy’s eradication of malaria — details how the coronavirus pandemic is threatening the globalist worldview of free movement of people and free trade.
The interview finds the Journal‘s Jason Willick seemingly admits the coronavirus is tainting globalism and pushing Americans and the peoples of Europe toward nationhood:
Yet while the [bubonic] plague saw power move up from villages and city-states to national capitals, the coronavirus is encouraging a devolution of authority from supranational units to the nation-state. This is most obvious in the European Union, where member states are setting their own responses. Open borders within the EU have been closed, and some countries have restricted export of medical supplies. The virus has heightened tensions between the U.S. and China, as Beijing tries to protect its image and Americans worry about access to medical supply chains. [Emphasis added]
Snowden told the Journal the coronavirus is a direct result of the globalization of the American economy after nearly four decades of free trade policy initiatives:
The coronavirus is threatening “the economic and political sinews of globalization, and causing them to unravel to a certain degree,” Mr. Snowden says. He notes that “coronavirus is emphatically a disease of globalization.” The virus is striking hardest in cities that are “densely populated and linked by rapid air travel, by movements of tourists, of refugees, all kinds of business people, all kinds of interlocking networks.” [Emphasis added]
Globalization, Snowden notes, has driven the coronavirus to majorly impact the wealthiest of Americans.
“Respiratory viruses, Mr. Snowden says, tend to be socially indiscriminate in whom they infect. Yet because of its origins in the vectors of globalization, the coronavirus appears to have affected the elite in a high-profile way,” the Journal piece states. “From Tom Hanks to Boris Johnson, people who travel frequently or are in touch with travelers have been among the first to get infected.”
The infection of thousands of the nation’s rich and upper-middle-class has driven class warfare in regions like the Hamptons in New York where some of the wealthiest, most liberal celebrities own property.
A report by Maureen Callahan for the New York Post chronicles how the working class staff of the Hamptons’ elite are turning on them as those infected disregard rules and Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines:
“There’s not a vegetable to be found in this town right now,” says one resident of Springs, a working-class pocket of East Hampton. “It’s these elitist people who think they don’t have to follow the rules.” [Emphasis added] It’s not just the drastic food shortage out here. Every aspect of life, most crucially medical care, is under strain from the sudden influx of rich Manhattanites panic-fleeing … — and in some cases, knowingly bringing coronavirus. [Emphasis added] … “We’re at the end of Long Island, the tip, and waves of people are bringing this s–t,” says lifelong Montauker James Katsipis. “We should blow up the bridges. Don’t let them in.” [Emphasis added]
While globalization has delivered soaring profits for corporate executives, working- and middle-class American communities have been left behind to grapple with fewer jobs, less industry, stagnant wages, and increase competition in the labor market due to decades-long mass legal immigration.
Since 2001, free trade with China has cost millions of Americans their jobs. For example, the Economic Policy Institute has found that from 2001 to 2015, about 3.4 million U.S. jobs were lost due to the nation’s trade deficit with China.
Of the 3.4 million U.S. jobs lost in that time period, about 2.6 million were lost in the manufacturing industry, making up about three-fourths of the loss of jobs from the U.S.-Chinese trade deficit.
John Binder is a reporter at Breitbart News.
Read more at www.breitbart.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-03-31--Coronavirus: if they lied then, why wouldn’t they lie now?

Coronavirus : if they lied then , why wouldn ’ t they lie now ?
In a recent article , I accepted public health stats on ordinary flu and COV , and showed the insane contradictions in numbers and in government containment strategies .
In this article , I take another angle .
The CDC has been lying about ordinary flu for decades .
So why wouldn ’ t they continue their fine tradition of lying about COV ?
Why should you believe ANYTHING they say about COV ?
Why should you accept their case numbers , their ominous warnings @ @ @ @ @ @ @ economies ?
It ’ s simple .
If a boy shows up at a grocery store the first six days of the week and steals an apple every time , when he shows up on the seventh day , why wouldn ’ t he steal an apple ?
And if that boy were the de facto president of the United States—enabling him to impose draconian measures on the population—should you trust him ?
The first issue is : how many people in the US die every year from the flu ?
The CDC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ parrot an annual figure of 36,000 .
Recently , it claimed 12,000-61,000 deaths per year .
In December of 2005 , the British Medical Journal ( online ) published a shocking report by Peter Doshi , which created tremors through the halls of the CDC .
Here is a quote from Doshi ’ s report , “ Are US flu death figures more PR than science ?
” ( BMJ 2005 ; 331:1412 ) : You see , the CDC created one overall category that combines both flu and pneumonia deaths .
Why @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disingenuously assume the pneumonia deaths are complications stemming from the flu .
This is an absurd assumption .
Pneumonia has a number of causes .
But even worse , in all the flu and pneumonia deaths , only 18 revealed the presence of an influenza virus .
Therefore , the CDC could not say , with assurance , that more than 18 Americans died of influenza in 2001 .
Not 36,000 deaths .
18 deaths .
Doshi continued his assessment of published CDC flu-death statistics : “ Between 1979 and 2001 , [ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1348 [ flu ] deaths per year ( range 257 to 3006 ) .
” These figures refer to flu separated out from pneumonia .
This death toll is obviously far lower than the parroted 36,000 figure .
However , when you add the sensible condition that lab tests have to actually find the flu virus in patients , the numbers of flu deaths would plummet even further .
In other words , it ’ s promotion and hype .
[ Note : Prior to Doshi publishing the above piece about flu deaths @ @ @ @ @ @ @ emails with him about that issue , and independent researcher , Martin Maloney , made a major contribution to uncovering the CDC deception . ]
The second big issue is : how many people diagnosed with the flu really have the flu ?
Peter Doshi again , writing in the online BMJ ( British Medical Journal ) , reveals another monstrosity .
As Doshi states , every year , hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples are taken from flu patients in the US and tested in labs .
Here is the kicker : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ show the presence of a flu virus .
This means : most of the people in America who are diagnosed by doctors with the flu have no flu virus in their bodies .
So they don ’ t have the flu .
Therefore , even if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe , it couldn ’ t possibly prevent all those “ flu cases ” that aren ’ t flu cases .
The vaccine isn ’ t designed to prevent fake flu , unless pigs can fly .
Here ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s BMJ review , “ Influenza : marketing vaccines by marketing disease ” ( BMJ 2013 ; 346 : f3037 ) : Because most diagnosed cases of the flu aren ’ t the flu .
So even if you ’ re a true believer in mainstream vaccine theory , you ’ re on the short end here .
They ’ re conning your socks off .
Let me give you a gigantic example of this massive flu-case-counting deception .
It involved a flu “ epidemic ” you might remember called Swine Flu .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Swine Flu epidemic was hyped to the sky by the CDC .
The Agency was calling for all Americans to take the Swine Flu vaccine .
The problem was , the CDC was concealing a scandal .
At the time , star CBS investigative reporter , Sharyl Attkisson , was working on a Swine Flu story .
She discovered that the CDC had secretly stopped counting US cases of the illness—while , of course , continuing to warn Americans about its unchecked spread .
Understand that the CDC ’ s main job @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
What was the Agency up to ?
Here is an excerpt from my 2014 interview with Sharyl Attkisson : Rappoport : In 2009 , you spearheaded coverage of the so-called Swine Flu pandemic .
You discovered that , in the summer of 2009 , the Centers for Disease Control , ignoring their federal mandate , [ secretly ] stopped counting Swine Flu cases in America .
Yet they continued to stir up fear about the “ pandemic , ” without having any real measure of its impact .
Wasn ’ t that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ down ?
Wasn ’ t there more to find out ?
Attkisson : The implications of the story were even worse than that .
We discovered through our FOI efforts that before the CDC mysteriously stopped counting Swine Flu cases , they had learned that almost none of the cases they had counted as Swine Flu was , in fact , Swine Flu or any sort of flu at all !
The interest in the story from one [ CBS ] executive was very enthusiastic .
He said it was “ the most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the whole Swine Flu epidemic .
But others pushed to stop it [ after it was published on the CBS News website ] and , in the end , no [ CBS television news ] broadcast wanted to touch it .
We aired numerous stories pumping up the idea of an epidemic , but not the one that would shed original , new light on all the hype .
It [ Attkisson ’ s article ] was fair , accurate , legally approved and a heck of a story .
With the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ secret , it meant that many in the public took and gave their children an experimental vaccine that may not have been necessary .
It was routine for doctors all over America to send tissue samples from patients they ’ d diagnosed with Swine Flu , or the “ most likely ” Swine Flu patients , to labs for testing .
And overwhelmingly , those samples were coming back with the result : not Swine Flu , not any kind of flu .
That was the big secret .
That ’ s what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s why they stopped reporting Swine Flu case numbers .
That ’ s what Attkisson had discovered .
That ’ s why she was shut down .
But it gets even worse .
Because about three weeks after Attkisson ’ s findings were published on the CBS News website , the CDC , obviously in a panic , decided to double down .
If one lie is exposed , tell an even bigger one .
A much bigger one .
Here , from a November 12 , 2009 , WebMD article is the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , 14 million to 34 million U.S. residents — the CDC ’ s best guess is 22 million — came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct. 17 [ 2009 ] .
” ( “ 22 million cases of Swine Flu in US , ” by Daniel J. DeNoon ) .
Are your eyeballs popping ?
They should be .
In the summer of 2009 , the CDC secretly stops counting Swine Flu cases in America , because the overwhelming percentage of lab tests from likely Swine Flu patients shows no sign of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ flu .
There is no Swine Flu epidemic .
Then , the CDC estimates there are 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US .
So…the premise that the CDC would never lie about important matters like , oh , a vaccine causing autism…you can lay that one to rest .
The CDC will lie about anything it wants to .
It will boldly go where no person interested in real science will go .
It will completely ignore its mandate to care about human health , and it will get away @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to accept falsehoods instead of the truth , as long as people would rather cling to what authority figures tell them .
And now , with the CDC spearheading the operation called COVID-19—from confirmation of the discovery of a “ new virus , ” to guidelines for diagnostic testing in patients , to case number counts , to containment policies , lockdowns that wreck economies and lives—do you really want to believe what they say ?
They went to the grocery store and stole an apple every day .
Then they turned around @ @ @ @ @ @ @ admit ten people at a time .
Then they shut down the city around the grocery store .
They sit high above the city looking out the window while they eat the apples .
About the author : Jon Rappoport is the author of three explosive collections , THE MATRIX REVEALED , EXIT FROM THE MATRIX , and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX , Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California .
Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize , he has worked as an investigative reporter for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , medicine , and health for CBS Healthwatch , LA Weekly , Spin Magazine , Stern , and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Coronavirus: if they lied then, why wouldn’t they lie now?
Written by Jon Rappoport
In a recent article, I accepted public health stats on ordinary flu and COV, and showed the insane contradictions in numbers and in government containment strategies.
In this article, I take another angle. The CDC has been lying about ordinary flu for decades. So why wouldn’t they continue their fine tradition of lying about COV?
Why should you believe ANYTHING they say about COV? Why should you accept their case numbers, their ominous warnings, their insistence on lockdowns which wreck economies?
It’s simple. If a boy shows up at a grocery store the first six days of the week and steals an apple every time, when he shows up on the seventh day, why wouldn’t he steal an apple? And if that boy were the de facto president of the United States—enabling him to impose draconian measures on the population—should you trust him?
The first issue is: how many people in the US die every year from the flu?
The CDC reshuffles its estimates. It used to parrot an annual figure of 36,000. Recently, it claimed 12,000-61,000 deaths per year.
In December of 2005, the British Medical Journal (online) published a shocking report by Peter Doshi, which created tremors through the halls of the CDC.
Here is a quote from Doshi’s report, “Are US flu death figures more PR than science?” (BMJ 2005; 331:1412):
“[According to CDC statistics], ‘influenza and pneumonia’ took 62,034 lives in 2001—61,777 of which were attributable to pneumonia and 257 to flu, and in only 18 cases was the flu virus positively identified.”
Boom.
You see, the CDC created one overall category that combines both flu and pneumonia deaths. Why do they do this? Because they disingenuously assume the pneumonia deaths are complications stemming from the flu.
This is an absurd assumption. Pneumonia has a number of causes.
But even worse, in all the flu and pneumonia deaths, only 18 revealed the presence of an influenza virus.
Therefore, the CDC could not say, with assurance, that more than 18 Americans died of influenza in 2001. Not 36,000 deaths. 18 deaths.
Doshi continued his assessment of published CDC flu-death statistics: “Between 1979 and 2001, [CDC] data show an average of 1348 [flu] deaths per year (range 257 to 3006).” These figures refer to flu separated out from pneumonia.
This death toll is obviously far lower than the parroted 36,000 figure.
However, when you add the sensible condition that lab tests have to actually find the flu virus in patients, the numbers of flu deaths would plummet even further.
In other words, it’s promotion and hype.
“Well, uh, we’ve said that 36,000 people die from the flu every year in the US. But actually, it’s probably closer to 20. Who knows? However, we can’t admit that, because if we did, we’d be exposing our gigantic psyop. The whole campaign to scare people into getting a flu shot would have about the same effect as warning people to carry iron umbrellas, in case toasters fall out of upper-story windows…and, by the way, we’d be put in prison for fraud.”
[Note: Prior to Doshi publishing the above piece about flu deaths, I engaged in a series of emails with him about that issue, and independent researcher, Martin Maloney, made a major contribution to uncovering the CDC deception.]
The second big issue is: how many people diagnosed with the flu really have the flu?
Peter Doshi again, writing in the online BMJ (British Medical Journal), reveals another monstrosity.
As Doshi states, every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples are taken from flu patients in the US and tested in labs. Here is the kicker: only a small percentage of these samples show the presence of a flu virus.
This means: most of the people in America who are diagnosed by doctors with the flu have no flu virus in their bodies.
So they don’t have the flu.
Therefore, even if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe, it couldn’t possibly prevent all those “flu cases” that aren’t flu cases.
The vaccine couldn’t possibly work.
The vaccine isn’t designed to prevent fake flu, unless pigs can fly.
Here’s the exact quote from Doshi’s BMJ review, “Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease” (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):
“…even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the ‘flu’ problem because most ‘flu’ appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive.” “…It’s no wonder so many people feel that ‘flu shots’ don’t work: for most flus, they can’t.”
Because most diagnosed cases of the flu aren’t the flu.
So even if you’re a true believer in mainstream vaccine theory, you’re on the short end here. They’re conning your socks off.
Let me give you a gigantic example of this massive flu-case-counting deception. It involved a flu “epidemic” you might remember called Swine Flu.
In the late summer of 2009, the Swine Flu epidemic was hyped to the sky by the CDC. The Agency was calling for all Americans to take the Swine Flu vaccine.
The problem was, the CDC was concealing a scandal.
At the time, star CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, was working on a Swine Flu story. She discovered that the CDC had secretly stopped counting US cases of the illness—while, of course, continuing to warn Americans about its unchecked spread.
Understand that the CDC’s main job is counting cases and reporting the numbers.
What was the Agency up to?
Here is an excerpt from my 2014 interview with Sharyl Attkisson:
Rappoport: In 2009, you spearheaded coverage of the so-called Swine Flu pandemic. You discovered that, in the summer of 2009, the Centers for Disease Control, ignoring their federal mandate, [secretly] stopped counting Swine Flu cases in America. Yet they continued to stir up fear about the “pandemic,” without having any real measure of its impact. Wasn’t that another investigation of yours that was shut down? Wasn’t there more to find out?
Attkisson: The implications of the story were even worse than that. We discovered through our FOI efforts that before the CDC mysteriously stopped counting Swine Flu cases, they had learned that almost none of the cases they had counted as Swine Flu was, in fact, Swine Flu or any sort of flu at all! The interest in the story from one [CBS] executive was very enthusiastic. He said it was “the most original story” he’d seen on the whole Swine Flu epidemic. But others pushed to stop it [after it was published on the CBS News website] and, in the end, no [CBS television news] broadcast wanted to touch it. We aired numerous stories pumping up the idea of an epidemic, but not the one that would shed original, new light on all the hype. It [Attkisson’s article] was fair, accurate, legally approved and a heck of a story. With the CDC keeping the true Swine Flu stats secret, it meant that many in the public took and gave their children an experimental vaccine that may not have been necessary.
—end of interview excerpt—
It was routine for doctors all over America to send tissue samples from patients they’d diagnosed with Swine Flu, or the “most likely” Swine Flu patients, to labs for testing. And overwhelmingly, those samples were coming back with the result: not Swine Flu, not any kind of flu.
That was the big secret. That’s what the CDC was hiding. That’s why they stopped reporting Swine Flu case numbers. That’s what Attkisson had discovered. That’s why she was shut down.
But it gets even worse.
Because about three weeks after Attkisson’s findings were published on the CBS News website, the CDC, obviously in a panic, decided to double down. If one lie is exposed, tell an even bigger one. A much bigger one.
Here, from a November 12, 2009, WebMD article is the CDC’s response: “Shockingly, 14 million to 34 million U.S. residents — the CDC’s best guess is 22 million — came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct. 17 [2009].” (“22 million cases of Swine Flu in US,” by Daniel J. DeNoon).
Are your eyeballs popping? They should be.
In the summer of 2009, the CDC secretly stops counting Swine Flu cases in America, because the overwhelming percentage of lab tests from likely Swine Flu patients shows no sign of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu.
There is no Swine Flu epidemic.
Then, the CDC estimates there are 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US.
So…the premise that the CDC would never lie about important matters like, oh, a vaccine causing autism…you can lay that one to rest.
The CDC will lie about anything it wants to. It will boldly go where no person interested in real science will go.
It will completely ignore its mandate to care about human health, and it will get away with it—as long as people are willing to accept falsehoods instead of the truth, as long as people would rather cling to what authority figures tell them.
And now, with the CDC spearheading the operation called COVID-19—from confirmation of the discovery of a “new virus,” to guidelines for diagnostic testing in patients, to case number counts, to containment policies, lockdowns that wreck economies and lives—do you really want to believe what they say?
They went to the grocery store and stole an apple every day. Then they turned around and said the grocery store could only admit ten people at a time. Then they shut down the city around the grocery store.
They sit high above the city looking out the window while they eat the apples.
Read more at blog.nomorefakenews.com
About the author: Jon Rappoport is the author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-03-31--Sudden Ancient Global Warming Event Traced to Magma Flood

That opening salvo was followed 4 million years later by a second gigantic pulse of hot mantle rock , which once again rode up the Iceland plume .
It swelled under the seafloor and lifted a wide region of ocean floor between Greenland and Europe into the air , forming a temporary land bridge connecting Scotland and Greenland .
Under the surface , the mantle blob melted , turning from solid rock to fluid magma .
The magma then bled , bruise-like , through sediments .
As the magma spread , it formed thousands of horizontal sheets known as sills @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This cooking produced methane and carbon dioxide gas that burst through vents in the seafloor .
As sheet after sheet of magma bled into the expanding bruise for millennia , more and more gas bubbled from the ocean like a boiling pot .
Evidence indicates that suspiciously close in time to all that igneous activity , the planet warmed by 5 degrees Celsius ( 9 degrees Fahrenheit ) .
In this ancient warming event , known as the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum , or PETM , land suffered intense downpours , while ocean @ @ @ @ @ @ @ extinct .
Many land animals went extinct as well and were replaced by dwarf species .
The Arctic had alligators , giant tortoises , and vegetation typical of Florida today , and sea levels were around 300 feet higher than now .
The PETM has preoccupied climate scientists since its discovery in the early 1990s because of its parallels to today ’ s climate change , including a temperature jump , ocean acidification , a huge shift in the atmospheric carbon level , and a profound effect on life .
To produce those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — around 10 trillion tons by recent estimates — must have been pumped into the sky .
But what was that carbon store ?
How could it be released so fast , and could a similar carbon reservoir be poised to amplify our current warming today ?
“ If we can understand … the closest analogue that we ’ ve got in the past hundred million years , then we ’ re going to be in a better shape to think about what ’ s going to happen in our lifetimes , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom .
Because many of the North Atlantic ’ s volcanic features , which scientists collectively call the “ North Atlantic Igneous Province , ” formed concurrently with the PETM , they are a candidate for the cause of the warming .
But coincidence isn ’ t causation , and there have been good scientific reasons to doubt that the volcanic activity could have caused the climate change .
Recently , a paper by Jones and his collaborators in Birmingham removed the last major doubt and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ principal driver of the warming .

That opening salvo was followed 4 million years later by a second gigantic pulse of hot mantle rock, which once again rode up the Iceland plume. It swelled under the seafloor and lifted a wide region of ocean floor between Greenland and Europe into the air, forming a temporary land bridge connecting Scotland and Greenland.
Under the surface, the mantle blob melted, turning from solid rock to fluid magma. The magma then bled, bruise-like, through sediments. As the magma spread, it formed thousands of horizontal sheets known as sills that cooked organic matter in the sediments. This cooking produced methane and carbon dioxide gas that burst through vents in the seafloor. As sheet after sheet of magma bled into the expanding bruise for millennia, more and more gas bubbled from the ocean like a boiling pot.
Evidence indicates that suspiciously close in time to all that igneous activity, the planet warmed by 5 degrees Celsius (9 degrees Fahrenheit). In this ancient warming event, known as the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, or PETM, land suffered intense downpours, while ocean acidification and heat drove many marine species extinct. Many land animals went extinct as well and were replaced by dwarf species. The Arctic had alligators, giant tortoises, and vegetation typical of Florida today, and sea levels were around 300 feet higher than now.
The PETM has preoccupied climate scientists since its discovery in the early 1990s because of its parallels to today’s climate change, including a temperature jump, ocean acidification, a huge shift in the atmospheric carbon level, and a profound effect on life. To produce those effects, a massive reservoir of carbon — around 10 trillion tons by recent estimates — must have been pumped into the sky. But what was that carbon store? How could it be released so fast, and could a similar carbon reservoir be poised to amplify our current warming today?
“If we can understand … the closest analogue that we’ve got in the past hundred million years, then we’re going to be in a better shape to think about what’s going to happen in our lifetimes,” said Stephen Jones, a geologist at the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom.
Because many of the North Atlantic’s volcanic features, which scientists collectively call the “North Atlantic Igneous Province,” formed concurrently with the PETM, they are a candidate for the cause of the warming. But coincidence isn’t causation, and there have been good scientific reasons to doubt that the volcanic activity could have caused the climate change. Recently, a paper by Jones and his collaborators in Birmingham removed the last major doubt and showed that igneous activity was indeed the principal driver of the warming.