principiascientificinternational--2020-05-21--Study: CV-19 Virus WAS ‘Pre-Adapted to Human Transmission’

A new study has challenged China ’ s claim that the coronavirus pandemic came from a wet market in the city of Wuhan last December .
The study found that the novel coronavirus was likely taken into the market by someone already carrying the disease .
[ 1 ] Biologists Alina Chan , Shing Zhan and Benjamin Deverman compared the “ evolutionary dynamics ” between SARS-CoV-2 , the scientific name for the novel coronavirus , and SARS-CoV , the scientific name for the coronavirus identified in 2003 .
The researchers said they were “ surprised ” to find that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 2003 coronavirus after it had already developed “ several advantageous adaptations for human transmission.
” “ Our observations suggest that by the time SARS-CoV-2 was first detected in late 2019 , it was already pre-adapted to human transmission to an extent similar to late epidemic SARS-CoV , ” the study said .
The researchers said that because the novel coronavirus was already adapted to be passed between humans , people must consider the possibility that it came from a human source rather than an animal .
“ The publicly available genetic data @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the virus at the market , ” Chan and Zhan said , according to the Daily Mail .
The researchers also compared samples from the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan and found that they were identical to the samples from humans .
“ The market samples are genetically identical to human SARS-CoV-2 isolates and were therefore most likely from human sources , ” the study read .
Chan and Deverman are scientists at the Broad Institute , a research unit affiliated with Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology , and Zhan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Their study , which was published early this month and has not been peer-reviewed , comes as the world tries to figure out the origin of the virus .
University of California , Berkeley research scientist Xiao Qiang told The Washington Post in April that the Chinese government needs to be transparent in order for scientists around the world to understand the virus .
“ I don ’ t think it ’ s a conspiracy theory , ” Xiao said of the idea that the virus could have come from a Wuhan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s a legitimate question that needs to be investigated and answered .
To understand exactly how this originated is critical knowledge for preventing this from happening in the future.
” By late January , NPR and other outlets reported the novel coronavirus most likely originated in a massive , well-traveled wet market in the city of Wuhan .
Medical experts on the ground indicated at the time that the Huanan Seafood Market had been the only major common denominator among those individuals admitted to Wuhan hospitals with the first known cases of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not made it easy for researchers to identify the source of the virus .
A Chinese official admitted on May 15 that the communist government ordered the destruction of samples of the coronavirus , citing safety and bureaucracy as the reasons .
Liu Dengfeng of the Chinese National Health Commission ’ s science and education department said samples of the virus were destroyed at unauthorized labs to “ prevent the risk to laboratory biological safety and prevent secondary disasters caused by unidentified pathogens.
” Liu said “ national-level professional institutes ” were seeking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when it first impacted residents of Wuhan .
“ Based on comprehensive research and expert opinion , we decided to temporarily manage the pathogen causing the pneumonia as Class II — highly pathogenic — and imposed biosafety requirements on sample collection , transport and experimental activities , as well as destroying the samples , ” he said .
But Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has said China ’ s actions are part of its effort to hide the truth .
“ It covered up how dangerous the disease is .
It didn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ month until it was in every province inside of China , ” he said on April 22 .
“ It censored those who tried to warn the world , it ordered a halt to testing of new samples , and it destroyed existing samples.
” This article appeared originally on The Western Journal .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Study: CV-19 Virus WAS ‘Pre-Adapted to Human Transmission’
Written by Erin Coates
A new study has challenged China’s claim that the coronavirus pandemic came from a wet market in the city of Wuhan last December.
The study found that the novel coronavirus was likely taken into the market by someone already carrying the disease. [1]
Biologists Alina Chan, Shing Zhan and Benjamin Deverman compared the “evolutionary dynamics” between SARS-CoV-2, the scientific name for the novel coronavirus, and SARS-CoV, the scientific name for the coronavirus identified in 2003.
The researchers said they were “surprised” to find that the novel coronavirus detected in December closely resembled the 2003 coronavirus after it had already developed “several advantageous adaptations for human transmission.”
“Our observations suggest that by the time SARS-CoV-2 was first detected in late 2019, it was already pre-adapted to human transmission to an extent similar to late epidemic SARS-CoV,” the study said.
The researchers said that because the novel coronavirus was already adapted to be passed between humans, people must consider the possibility that it came from a human source rather than an animal.
“The publicly available genetic data does not point to cross-species transmission of the virus at the market,” Chan and Zhan said, according to the Daily Mail.
The researchers also compared samples from the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan and found that they were identical to the samples from humans.
“The market samples are genetically identical to human SARS-CoV-2 isolates and were therefore most likely from human sources,” the study read.
Chan and Deverman are scientists at the Broad Institute, a research unit affiliated with Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Zhan is with the University of British Columbia.
Their study, which was published early this month and has not been peer-reviewed, comes as the world tries to figure out the origin of the virus.
University of California, Berkeley research scientist Xiao Qiang told The Washington Post in April that the Chinese government needs to be transparent in order for scientists around the world to understand the virus.
“I don’t think it’s a conspiracy theory,” Xiao said of the idea that the virus could have come from a Wuhan lab. “I think it’s a legitimate question that needs to be investigated and answered. To understand exactly how this originated is critical knowledge for preventing this from happening in the future.”
By late January, NPR and other outlets reported the novel coronavirus most likely originated in a massive, well-traveled wet market in the city of Wuhan.
Medical experts on the ground indicated at the time that the Huanan Seafood Market had been the only major common denominator among those individuals admitted to Wuhan hospitals with the first known cases of the virus.
But the Chinese government has not made it easy for researchers to identify the source of the virus.
A Chinese official admitted on May 15 that the communist government ordered the destruction of samples of the coronavirus, citing safety and bureaucracy as the reasons.
Liu Dengfeng of the Chinese National Health Commission’s science and education department said samples of the virus were destroyed at unauthorized labs to “prevent the risk to laboratory biological safety and prevent secondary disasters caused by unidentified pathogens.”
Liu said “national-level professional institutes” were seeking to identify the virus causing the disease when it first impacted residents of Wuhan.
“Based on comprehensive research and expert opinion, we decided to temporarily manage the pathogen causing the pneumonia as Class II — highly pathogenic — and imposed biosafety requirements on sample collection, transport and experimental activities, as well as destroying the samples,” he said.
But Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has said China’s actions are part of its effort to hide the truth.
“It covered up how dangerous the disease is. It didn’t report sustained human-to-human transmission for a month until it was in every province inside of China,” he said on April 22. “It censored those who tried to warn the world, it ordered a halt to testing of new samples, and it destroyed existing samples.”
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
[1] https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.01.073262v1.full
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-21--Earth’s Strangely Weakening Magnetic Field Disrupts Satellites

In an area stretching from Africa to South America , Earth ’ s magnetic field is gradually weakening .
This strange behaviour has geophysicists puzzled and is causing technical disturbances in satellites orbiting Earth .
Scientists are using data from ESA ’ s Swarm constellation to improve our understanding of this area known as the ‘ South Atlantic Anomaly.
’ Earth ’ s magnetic field is vital to life on our planet .
It is a complex and dynamic force that protects us from cosmic radiation and charged particles from the Sun .
The magnetic field is largely generated by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ iron that makes up the outer core around 3000 km beneath our feet .
Acting as a spinning conductor in a bicycle dynamo , it creates electrical currents , which in turn , generate our continuously changing electromagnetic field .
This field is far from static and varies both in strength and direction .
For example , recent studies have shown that the position of the north magnetic pole is changing rapidly .
Over the last 200 years , the magnetic field has lost around 9 % of its strength on a global @ @ @ @ @ @ @ magnetic intensity has developed between Africa and South America and is known as the South Atlantic Anomaly .
From 1970 to 2020 , the minimum field strength in this area has dropped from around 24 000 nanoteslas to 22 000 , while at the same time the area of the anomaly has grown and moved westward at a pace of around 20 km per year .
Over the past five years , a second centre of minimum intensity has emerged southwest of Africa—indicating that the South Atlantic Anomaly could split up into two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ refers to an area where our protective shield is weak .
This animation shows the magnetic field strength at Earth ’ s surface from 2014-2020 based on data collected by the Swarm satellite constellation .
Credit : Division of Geomagnetism , DTU Space Earth ’ s magnetic field is often visualised as a powerful dipolar bar magnet at the centre of the planet , tilted at around 11° to the axis of rotation .
However , the growth of the South Atlantic Anomaly indicates that the processes involved in generating the field are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are unable to account for the recent development of the second minimum .
Scientists from the Swarm Data , Innovation and Science Cluster ( DISC ) are using data from ESA ’ s Swarm satellite constellation to better understand this anomaly .
Swarm satellites are designed to identify and precisely measure the different magnetic signals that make up Earth ’ s magnetic field .
Jürgen Matzka , from the German Research Centre for Geosciences , says , It has been speculated whether the current weakening of the field is a sign that Earth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which the north and south magnetic poles switch places .
Such events have occurred many times throughout the planet ’ s history and even though we are long overdue by the average rate at which these reversals take place ( roughly every 250 000 years ) , the intensity dip in the South Atlantic occurring now is well within what is considered normal levels of fluctuations .
At surface level , the South Atlantic Anomaly presents no cause for alarm .
However , satellites and other spacecraft flying through the area are more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ magnetic field is weaker in this region , so charged particles can penetrate the altitudes of low-Earth orbit satellites .
The mystery of the origin of the South Atlantic Anomaly has yet to be solved .
However , one thing is certain : magnetic field observations from Swarm are providing exciting new insights into the scarcely understood processes of Earth ’ s interior .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Scientific Method .

Earth’s Strangely Weakening Magnetic Field Disrupts Satellites
Written by European Space Agency
In an area stretching from Africa to South America, Earth’s magnetic field is gradually weakening. This strange behaviour has geophysicists puzzled and is causing technical disturbances in satellites orbiting Earth.
Scientists are using data from ESA’s Swarm constellation to improve our understanding of this area known as the ‘South Atlantic Anomaly.’
Earth’s magnetic field is vital to life on our planet. It is a complex and dynamic force that protects us from cosmic radiation and charged particles from the Sun. The magnetic field is largely generated by an ocean of superheated, swirling liquid iron that makes up the outer core around 3000 km beneath our feet. Acting as a spinning conductor in a bicycle dynamo, it creates electrical currents, which in turn, generate our continuously changing electromagnetic field.
This field is far from static and varies both in strength and direction. For example, recent studies have shown that the position of the north magnetic pole is changing rapidly.
Over the last 200 years, the magnetic field has lost around 9{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of its strength on a global average. A large region of reduced magnetic intensity has developed between Africa and South America and is known as the South Atlantic Anomaly.
From 1970 to 2020, the minimum field strength in this area has dropped from around 24 000 nanoteslas to 22 000, while at the same time the area of the anomaly has grown and moved westward at a pace of around 20 km per year. Over the past five years, a second centre of minimum intensity has emerged southwest of Africa—indicating that the South Atlantic Anomaly could split up into two separate cells.
The South Atlantic Anomaly refers to an area where our protective shield is weak. This animation shows the magnetic field strength at Earth’s surface from 2014-2020 based on data collected by the Swarm satellite constellation. Credit: Division of Geomagnetism, DTU Space
Earth’s magnetic field is often visualised as a powerful dipolar bar magnet at the centre of the planet, tilted at around 11° to the axis of rotation. However, the growth of the South Atlantic Anomaly indicates that the processes involved in generating the field are far more complex. Simple dipolar models are unable to account for the recent development of the second minimum.
Scientists from the Swarm Data, Innovation and Science Cluster (DISC) are using data from ESA’s Swarm satellite constellation to better understand this anomaly. Swarm satellites are designed to identify and precisely measure the different magnetic signals that make up Earth’s magnetic field.
Jürgen Matzka, from the German Research Centre for Geosciences, says,
“The new, eastern minimum of the South Atlantic Anomaly has appeared over the last decade and in recent years is developing vigorously. We are very lucky to have the Swarm satellites in orbit to investigate the development of the South Atlantic Anomaly. The challenge now is to understand the processes in Earth’s core driving these changes.”
It has been speculated whether the current weakening of the field is a sign that Earth is heading for an eminent pole reversal—in which the north and south magnetic poles switch places. Such events have occurred many times throughout the planet’s history and even though we are long overdue by the average rate at which these reversals take place (roughly every 250 000 years), the intensity dip in the South Atlantic occurring now is well within what is considered normal levels of fluctuations.
At surface level, the South Atlantic Anomaly presents no cause for alarm. However, satellites and other spacecraft flying through the area are more likely to experience technical malfunctions as the magnetic field is weaker in this region, so charged particles can penetrate the altitudes of low-Earth orbit satellites.
The mystery of the origin of the South Atlantic Anomaly has yet to be solved. However, one thing is certain: magnetic field observations from Swarm are providing exciting new insights into the scarcely understood processes of Earth’s interior.
See:Video: Magnetic field update Provided by European Space Agency
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-21--COVID-19 Autopsies Show Lung Damage, Blood Clots

Twelve detailed autopsies on coronavirus patients show that death was due to lung problems related to inflammation with ARDS and/or blood clots .
Antiphospholipid syndrome might be a commonality among patients with thrombosis in COVID-19 patients .
In all 12 cases , the cause of death was found within the lungs or the pulmonary vascular system .
For the ones who did not die of large pulmonary emboli , they died of the extensive inflammation within the lungs , meaning pneumonia with ARDS .
In these cases , the lungs were wet and heavy , much like a sponge that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the lung often had a distinct patchy pattern , with pale areas alternating with slightly protruding and firm , deep reddish-blue hypercapillarized areas .
This is indicative of areas of intense inflammation , with endothelial dysfunction that can be seen at the microscopic level .
When they look at slices of the lungs under the microscope , they found diffuse alveolar damage in 8 cases .
Specifically , they saw hyaline membrane formation , and tiny clots in the capillaries , and capillaries that were engorged with red blood cells , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ represent ARDS .
They also found lymphocytes , a type of white blood cell , infiltrated these areas of infiltration .
This fits the picture of viral pathogenesis .
They also looked at the pharynx of these patients , meaning in their throat .
The lining of the throat , or mucosa , was hyperemic , meaning very red and irritated , and at the microscopic level , they saw lymphocytes invading there , which is consistent with a viral infection .
In one case , a patient had lymphocytes invade his heart @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what we call viral myocarditis .
More than half of the patients in this study had large blood clots .
One-third of the patients had pulmonary embolism as the direct cause of death .
All the others died of intense inflammation in their lungs related to pneumonia with ARDS ( Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ) .
Recently there ’ s been studies showing that about 1/3rd of patients with severe COVID have blood clots .
Another study of 191 patients with coronavirus aka COVID-19 , half of those who died had clots , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And levels of D-dimer that were greater than 1000 µg/L were associated with a fatal outcome .
So it ’ s pretty clear now that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is causing a lot of clots to form in moderate to severe COVID disease .
How is this happening ?
It ’ s likely a combination of reasons , that has to do with downregulation of the ACE2 receptor in the lung alveoli , with a subsequent shift towards having more angiotensin II in the lungs , and less angiotensin 1-7 and 1-9 in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this leads to more cytokine storm with more inflammation , more constriction of pulmonary arteries , and more clots that develop .
That , in turn , leads to more endothelial dysfunction in the capillaries that surround the alveoli .
Also , there is evidence that the virus attaches to the ACE2 receptors of those endothelial cells that line those capillaries , which further propagates inflammation and clotting .
And in the cytokine storm that develops there , RANTES , a chemokine , binds to the CCR5 receptor of CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ infiltrate those areas of inflammation , and in doing so , further contributes towards the inflammatory reaction .
This is why we are seeing low levels of CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes in severe COVID .
Endothelial damage can also lead to the development of antiphospholipid antibodies , and these antibodies are bad because they trigger the formation of blood clots .
That ’ s why patients who have clots with the diagnosis of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome need to be on blood thinners .
Also , 11 out of the 12 patients in this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ obese .
These are known risk factors not just for cardiovascular disease , but also known risk factors for endothelial dysfunction , and are known risk factors for COVID .
So the big takeaways from the findings in this study are that most people who die of COVID , it ’ s primarily a lung problem .
Either related to inflammation with ARDS and/or blood clots .
Antiphospholipid syndrome might be a commonality among patients with thrombosis in COVID-19 patients .
This is the link to the main study in this video : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dr. Mike Hansen is an MD Internal Medicine | Pulmonary Disease | Critical Care Medicine Website : https : //doctormikehansen.com/ Instagram Account : http : //instagram.com/doctor.hansen/ PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

COVID-19 Autopsies Show Lung Damage, Blood Clots
Written by Mike Hansen MD
Twelve detailed autopsies on coronavirus patients show that death was due to lung problems related to inflammation with ARDS and/or blood clots. Antiphospholipid syndrome might be a commonality among patients with thrombosis in COVID-19 patients.
In all 12 cases, the cause of death was found within the lungs or the pulmonary vascular system. For the ones who did not die of large pulmonary emboli, they died of the extensive inflammation within the lungs, meaning pneumonia with ARDS.
In these cases, the lungs were wet and heavy, much like a sponge that is saturated with water. The surfaces of the lung often had a distinct patchy pattern, with pale areas alternating with slightly protruding and firm, deep reddish-blue hypercapillarized areas.
Watch the video here:
This is indicative of areas of intense inflammation, with endothelial dysfunction that can be seen at the microscopic level. When they look at slices of the lungs under the microscope, they found diffuse alveolar damage in 8 cases.
Specifically, they saw hyaline membrane formation, and tiny clots in the capillaries, and capillaries that were engorged with red blood cells, and other inflammatory findings. All these findings represent ARDS. They also found lymphocytes, a type of white blood cell, infiltrated these areas of infiltration.
This fits the picture of viral pathogenesis. They also looked at the pharynx of these patients, meaning in their throat. The lining of the throat, or mucosa, was hyperemic, meaning very red and irritated, and at the microscopic level, they saw lymphocytes invading there, which is consistent with a viral infection.
In one case, a patient had lymphocytes invade his heart muscle, findings that are consistent with what we call viral myocarditis. More than half of the patients in this study had large blood clots. One-third of the patients had pulmonary embolism as the direct cause of death.
All the others died of intense inflammation in their lungs related to pneumonia with ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome). Recently there’s been studies showing that about 1/3rd of patients with severe COVID have blood clots. Another study of 191 patients with coronavirus aka COVID-19, half of those who died had clots, compared with 7{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of survivors.
And levels of D-dimer that were greater than 1000 µg/L were associated with a fatal outcome. So it’s pretty clear now that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is causing a lot of clots to form in moderate to severe COVID disease. How is this happening?
It’s likely a combination of reasons, that has to do with downregulation of the ACE2 receptor in the lung alveoli, with a subsequent shift towards having more angiotensin II in the lungs, and less angiotensin 1-7 and 1-9 in the lungs, and when this happens, this leads to more cytokine storm with more inflammation, more constriction of pulmonary arteries, and more clots that develop.
That, in turn, leads to more endothelial dysfunction in the capillaries that surround the alveoli. Also, there is evidence that the virus attaches to the ACE2 receptors of those endothelial cells that line those capillaries, which further propagates inflammation and clotting. And in the cytokine storm that develops there, RANTES, a chemokine, binds to the CCR5 receptor of CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes, and that causes those lymphocytes to infiltrate those areas of inflammation, and in doing so, further contributes towards the inflammatory reaction.
This is why we are seeing low levels of CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes in severe COVID. Endothelial damage can also lead to the development of antiphospholipid antibodies, and these antibodies are bad because they trigger the formation of blood clots.
That’s why patients who have clots with the diagnosis of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome need to be on blood thinners. Also, 11 out of the 12 patients in this study had underlying heart disease and were obese. These are known risk factors not just for cardiovascular disease, but also known risk factors for endothelial dysfunction, and are known risk factors for COVID.
So the big takeaways from the findings in this study are that most people who die of COVID, it’s primarily a lung problem. Either related to inflammation with ARDS and/or blood clots. Antiphospholipid syndrome might be a commonality among patients with thrombosis in COVID-19 patients.
This is the link to the main study in this video: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.73…
About the author: Dr. Mike Hansen is an MD Internal Medicine | Pulmonary Disease | Critical Care Medicine Website: https://doctormikehansen.com/ Instagram Account: http://instagram.com/doctor.hansen/
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-21--NASA Discovers Parallel Universe Where Time Runs Backward

In a scenario straight out of “ The Twilight Zone , ” a group of NASA scientists working on an experiment in Antarctica have detected evidence of a parallel universe — where the rules of physics are the opposite of our own , according to a report .
The concept of a parallel universe has been around since the early 1960s , mostly in the minds of fans of sci-fi TV shows and comics , but now a cosmic ray detection experiment has found particles that could be from a parallel realm that also was born in the Big Bang @ @ @ @ @ @ @ experts used a giant balloon to carry NASA ’ s Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna , or ANITA , high above Antarctica , where the frigid , dry air provided the perfect environment with little to no radio noise to distort its findings .
A constant “ wind ” of high-energy particles constantly arrives on Earth from outer space .
Low-energy , subatomic neutrinos with a mass close to zero can pass completely through Earth , but higher-energy objects are stopped by the solid matter of our planet , according to the report .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ be detected coming “ down ” from space , but the team ’ s ANITA detected heavier particles , so-called tau neutrinos , which come “ up ” out of the Earth .
The finding implies that these particles are actually traveling backward in time , suggesting evidence of a parallel universe , according to the Daily Star .
Principal ANITA investigator Peter Gorham , an experimental particle physicist at the University of Hawaii , suggested that the only way the tau neutrino could behave that way is if it changed into a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Earth and then back again .
Gorham , lead author on a Cornell University paper describing the odd phenomenon , noted that he and his fellow researchers had seen several of these “ impossible events , ” which some were skeptical about .
“ Not everyone was comfortable with the hypothesis , ” he told New Scientist .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To @ @ @ @ @

NASA Discovers Parallel Universe Where Time Runs Backward
Written by Yaron Steinbuch
In a scenario straight out of “The Twilight Zone,” a group of NASA scientists working on an experiment in Antarctica have detected evidence of a parallel universe — where the rules of physics are the opposite of our own, according to a report.
The concept of a parallel universe has been around since the early 1960s, mostly in the minds of fans of sci-fi TV shows and comics, but now a cosmic ray detection experiment has found particles that could be from a parallel realm that also was born in the Big Bang, the Daily Star reported.
The experts used a giant balloon to carry NASA’s Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna, or ANITA, high above Antarctica, where the frigid, dry air provided the perfect environment with little to no radio noise to distort its findings.
A constant “wind” of high-energy particles constantly arrives on Earth from outer space.
Low-energy, subatomic neutrinos with a mass close to zero can pass completely through Earth, but higher-energy objects are stopped by the solid matter of our planet, according to the report.
That means the high-energy particles can only be detected coming “down” from space, but the team’s ANITA detected heavier particles, so-called tau neutrinos, which come “up” out of the Earth.
The finding implies that these particles are actually traveling backward in time, suggesting evidence of a parallel universe, according to the Daily Star.
Principal ANITA investigator Peter Gorham, an experimental particle physicist at the University of Hawaii, suggested that the only way the tau neutrino could behave that way is if it changed into a different type of particle before passing through the Earth and then back again.
Gorham, lead author on a Cornell University paper describing the odd phenomenon, noted that he and his fellow researchers had seen several of these “impossible events,” which some were skeptical about.
“Not everyone was comfortable with the hypothesis,” he told New Scientist.
Read more at nypost.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-21--Understanding Viruses: A Personal Journey

The COVID-19 pandemic and the seeming failure of ‘ experts ’ to understand and control the disease has awakened interest in the alternate theory of viruses proposed by Antoine Bechamp , a contemporary of Louis Pasteur .
Mainstream medicine follows Pasteur ’ s Germ Theory and tells us that virtually all illness is caused by germs or genetic hereditary weakness , as well as deformities and trauma injuries .
Bechamp ’ s theory ( supported by Jeff G ) suggests most illness is due to cellular malfunction caused by cellular toxicities and cellular malnutrition .
I began researching health around @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now 31 .
I did so because I wanted to find the truth about health and how to get myself healthy , as I was an unhealthy person at the time .
As a child , I had an irrational fear of germs , washing my hands until they bled .
As I got older , I realized that this was not natural and that society misled me , but I did not know the answers to how or why .
I feared my body and those around me .
Luckily , I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doctors .
Although I was vaccinated 2 to 3 times as a child , I have not been vaccinated in 25 years , and I have not visited a doctor since I was 17 years old .
I reversed my bad health by adopting a 70 % raw diet ( Primal Diet ) , with raw milk , raw meat , and raw eggs that have increased my ability to think and my health greatly .
I ’ ve lost at least 3 family members due to medical maltreatment , which also fueled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ health and nutrition was supplemented with my study on Freemasonry , and the nefarious nature that it permeates through government .
I learned that the medical profession is , in fact , part of this fraternal organization , and part and parcel to the manipulation of mind and body for nefarious purposes of control .
I set out to try to determine what is the truth .
I began writing what would become my book ‘ The Age of Deception ’ around 3 1/2 years ago after I felt confident in my years @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attempt to bring attention to proper nutrition , and the veiled history of viruses and their relationship with the body .
The intent : to shed light on the immense dangers we face with regard to governmental control of body and mind for nefarious purposes , through the fraudulent sciences of viruses , bacteria , and vaccines , amongst others .
At the time , there was no pandemic occurring or even thought about .
I , however , had a clue as to what those in power were intending and where it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the years and by closely following their build-up of the so-called measles ‘ epidemic ’ last year , which was also a fraud .
I was intently observing how unconstitutional laws were being passed in California and other states with regard to vaccines .
Anti-vaccination proponents , like myself , were heavily vocal on public forums at the time , attempting to wake the people to what was occurring and was in return viciously attacked .
I knew that because of those passionately speaking out about vaccines , those in power must begin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the perceived image of vaccines , as more and more around the world turned away from them .
What better way than to manufacture a fraudulent pandemic to increase vaccination rates and bring about the justification for governmental control therein .
As predicted in my previous writings , this came to pass after the measles ‘ epidemic ’ failed , and we are now facing a great threat of government tyranny .
If the people do not seek the truth and take action , they will become enslaved through body and mind by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and mandated vaccination becoming reality .
The topics I cover in the book include : 4 sections/100 pages , that cover in detail the causes of autism and the mechanisms by which it arises in the body .
The dangers of vaccines and how they function biologically .
How viruses arise in the body , their purpose , and function .
How metallic toxicity causes neural and cellular degeneration .
Coronavirus , and how environmental pollution causes eventual viral detoxifications .
And other topics of nutrition and how to combat environmental toxicity and @ @ @ @ @

Written by Jeff G
The COVID-19 pandemic and the seeming failure of ‘experts’ to understand and control the disease has awakened interest in the alternate theory of viruses proposed by Antoine Bechamp, a contemporary of Louis Pasteur.
Mainstream medicine follows Pasteur’s Germ Theory and tells us that virtually all illness is caused by germs or genetic hereditary weakness, as well as deformities and trauma injuries. Bechamp’s theory (supported by Jeff G) suggests most illness is due to cellular malfunction caused by cellular toxicities and cellular malnutrition.
Jeff explains his personal journey towards accepting Bechamp’s position:
I began researching health around the age of 17, and am now 31. I did so because I wanted to find the truth about health and how to get myself healthy, as I was an unhealthy person at the time. As a child, I had an irrational fear of germs, washing my hands until they bled. As I got older, I realized that this was not natural and that society misled me, but I did not know the answers to how or why. I feared my body and those around me. Luckily, I did not vaccinate myself because I feared doctors.
Although I was vaccinated 2 to 3 times as a child, I have not been vaccinated in 25 years, and I have not visited a doctor since I was 17 years old. I reversed my bad health by adopting a 70{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} raw diet (Primal Diet), with raw milk, raw meat, and raw eggs that have increased my ability to think and my health greatly. I’ve lost at least 3 family members due to medical maltreatment, which also fueled my study. The natural progression of health and nutrition was supplemented with my study on Freemasonry, and the nefarious nature that it permeates through government. I learned that the medical profession is, in fact, part of this fraternal organization, and part and parcel to the manipulation of mind and body for nefarious purposes of control. I set out to try to determine what is the truth.
I began writing what would become my book ‘The Age of Deception’ around 3 1/2 years ago after I felt confident in my years of research and learning, in an attempt to bring attention to proper nutrition, and the veiled history of viruses and their relationship with the body. The intent: to shed light on the immense dangers we face with regard to governmental control of body and mind for nefarious purposes, through the fraudulent sciences of viruses, bacteria, and vaccines, amongst others. At the time, there was no pandemic occurring or even thought about. I, however, had a clue as to what those in power were intending and where it was headed based upon my researches over the years and by closely following their build-up of the so-called measles ‘epidemic’ last year, which was also a fraud. I was intently observing how unconstitutional laws were being passed in California and other states with regard to vaccines.
Anti-vaccination proponents, like myself, were heavily vocal on public forums at the time, attempting to wake the people to what was occurring and was in return viciously attacked. I knew that because of those passionately speaking out about vaccines, those in power must begin to try to reverse this damage to the perceived image of vaccines, as more and more around the world turned away from them. What better way than to manufacture a fraudulent pandemic to increase vaccination rates and bring about the justification for governmental control therein. As predicted in my previous writings, this came to pass after the measles ‘epidemic’ failed, and we are now facing a great threat of government tyranny. If the people do not seek the truth and take action, they will become enslaved through body and mind by a totalitarian world government, with forced and mandated vaccination becoming reality.
The topics I cover in the book include:
4 sections/100 pages, that cover in detail the causes of autism and the mechanisms by which it arises in the body. The dangers of vaccines and how they function biologically. How viruses arise in the body, their purpose, and function. How metallic toxicity causes neural and cellular degeneration. Coronavirus, and how environmental pollution causes eventual viral detoxifications. And other topics of nutrition and how to combat environmental toxicity and reverse and prevent disease.


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-22--10,000 UK Health Workers Start COVID-19 Trial of Trump’s HCQ Meds

Britain ’ s National Health Service ( NHS ) has revealed that it is following U.S. President Donald Trump ’ s lead on experimenting with hydroxychloroquine as a coronavirus preventative .
The state-run , socialised healthcare provider will be giving hydroxychloroquine to as many as 10,000 health workers at at least 20 hospitals as part of a clinical trial led by the Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit ( Moru ) , to confirm anecdotal evidence that it can prevent people from catching the Chinese virus .
The announcement may give satisfaction to President Trump , who was slammed by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that he was taking hydroxychloroquine as a possible preventative .
The American leader told reporters on Monday that they would “ be surprised at how many people are taking [ hydroxychloroquine ] , especially the frontline workers , before you catch it , ” before revealing that he is taking the drug himself .
Chuck Schumer , who leads the Democrats in the U.S. Senate , branded the President “ reckless ” and claimed that “ All the experts say at best it doesn ’ t help ” following the revelation .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ something that has not been approved by the scientists , especially in his age group , ” added Nancy Pelosi , Schumer ’ s 80-year-old counterpart in the House of Representatives — before going on to suggest the President should be extra cautious because he is “ morbidly obese ” .
“ Based on the known pharmacology of hydroxychloroquine , coupled with the emerging knowledge surrounding SARS-CoV-2 viral replication and Covid-19 pathophysiology , we were very keen to test the effectiveness of this molecule in a preventative rather than late-stage treatment setting , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Europe , a British pharmaceuticals manufacturer which has donated more than two million tablets for the NHS study .
“ If drugs as well tolerated as chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine could reduce the chances of catching Covid-19 , this would be incredibly valuable , ” explained Professor Martin Llewelyn , the study ’ s British lead .
“ If these drugs offer even a degree of protection , it would be a very big deal .
We know from previous studies that these drugs have anti-viral activity , but as a treatment it seems @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said .
“ It seems the best chance of these drugs having a role could be in prevention , ” he concluded — exactly the reason President Trump has been using the drug .

10,000 UK Health Workers Start COVID-19 Trial of Trump’s HCQ Meds
Written by Jack Montgomery
Britain’s National Health Service (NHS) has revealed that it is following U.S. President Donald Trump’s lead on experimenting with hydroxychloroquine as a coronavirus preventative.
The state-run, socialised healthcare provider will be giving hydroxychloroquine to as many as 10,000 health workers at at least 20 hospitals as part of a clinical trial led by the Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (Moru), to confirm anecdotal evidence that it can prevent people from catching the Chinese virus.
The announcement may give satisfaction to President Trump, who was slammed by left-liberal politicians and commentators when he revealed that he was taking hydroxychloroquine as a possible preventative.
The American leader told reporters on Monday that they would “be surprised at how many people are taking [hydroxychloroquine], especially the frontline workers, before you catch it,” before revealing that he is taking the drug himself.
Chuck Schumer, who leads the Democrats in the U.S. Senate, branded the President “reckless” and claimed that “All the experts say at best it doesn’t help” following the revelation.
“I would rather he not be taking something that has not been approved by the scientists, especially in his age group,” added Nancy Pelosi, Schumer’s 80-year-old counterpart in the House of Representatives — before going on to suggest the President should be extra cautious because he is “morbidly obese”.
Breitbart News ✔@BreitbartNews President Donald Trump on Monday confirmed at the White House that he was taking hydroxychloroquine and zinc as preventatives against the coronavirus. https://trib.al/EFcAzOb 2,273 Twitter Ads info and privacy 845 people are talking about this
“Based on the known pharmacology of hydroxychloroquine, coupled with the emerging knowledge surrounding SARS-CoV-2 viral replication and Covid-19 pathophysiology, we were very keen to test the effectiveness of this molecule in a preventative rather than late-stage treatment setting,” said Dr Anthony Grosso of Accord Europe, a British pharmaceuticals manufacturer which has donated more than two million tablets for the NHS study. “If drugs as well tolerated as chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine could reduce the chances of catching Covid-19, this would be incredibly valuable,” explained Professor Martin Llewelyn, the study’s British lead.
“If these drugs offer even a degree of protection, it would be a very big deal. We know from previous studies that these drugs have anti-viral activity, but as a treatment it seems to be relatively modest,” he said .
“It seems the best chance of these drugs having a role could be in prevention,” he concluded — exactly the reason President Trump has been using the drug.
Breitbart News ✔@BreitbartNews Why is the Establishment Media so determined to attack hydroxychloroquine? “As soon as [Trump] said something positive about it, the media has been on a jihad to discredit the drug. It’s quite strange.” https://trib.al/qptinQQ 10.1K Twitter Ads info and privacy 4,938 people are talking about this Read more at www.breitbart.com ***** PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. Please DONATE TODAY Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-22--The ‘Pandemic’ As A Social Engineering Experiment

When something is repeated over and over , it often has the capacity to put us to sleep .
But occasionally , it has the opposite effect .
Sometimes in the wake of redundant messaging our senses are aroused to a bitter taste or a stale odor that tells us something is just not right .
I had such an experience in tuning in to Ontario ’ s daily COVID-19 briefing today which I had done , optimistically , to see if there was any advance on when schools would be opening for my 6-year old .
( no such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ beginning of health minister Christine Elliot ’ s segment : Elliot was literally gushing as she extolled the virtues of our health care workers .
It was almost as though she had convinced herself that her plaudits were sincere .
The surface political motive for many of our leaders to heap praise on health care workers , and encourage the public to do the same , is fairly straightforward .
In thanking others , one gets to bask in the reflected glory of their accomplishments .
But upon deeper reflection , one can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ employed in the case of this pandemic because it simultaneously touches on all the bases that our authority want conveyed during their public proclamations .
In fact , there are few social programming techniques that I can think of that are more powerful or effective .
Let ’ s touch on a few of the bases ourselves : Amplifying the Severity of the Pandemic .
Through the clever sleight-of-hand of the praise of others , which the listening audience tends to take in readily with their guard down and their discernment filters on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fully convince us of the danger we are facing , by commending health care workers for being willing to confront this danger .
The more heroic we are made to think they are , the more danger that is implied .
While the praise towards our fellow human beings ( who are not part of the authority ) makes us feel good to a certain extent , what is really being heightened in us is that low-level fear that this virus is lurking , ready to pounce on us at any misstep .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of fear is much easier to control and manipulate .
Legitimizing Western medicine .
Listen to her terminology .
‘ our partners on the front lines…the brave heroes working on the front lines.
’ Why ‘ Front lines ’ ?
Why is health care a ‘ fight , ’ always some kind of ‘ war ’ ?
Because this has been the pre-eminent strategy of Western medicine all along–to make us feel that there has been an enemy invasion ( a virus ) .
To make us feel that our body does not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ medicine virtually ignores our immune system ) .
To make us feel that we are under attack , need protection , and the army of doctors and researchers spawned from Western medical school is our only hope ( of course this is why traditional medicine , which works in concert with the immune system , has for so long been labelled quackery and pseudoscience ) .
Reinforcing government authority .
In praising the health care workers and the system they operate within , our authority is actually reinforcing its own praiseworthiness without saying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is seen as the benevolent manager of the whole process , ‘ partnering ’ with those laudable heroes in the health care system .
So when the government brags that they ’ ve ‘ made historic investments to dramatically expand hospital capacity , ’ should we be standing up and applauding ?
Or should we be asking , if this whole government-medical system partnership is working so well , shouldn ’ t we be seeing a reduction in hospital beds instead of a constant increase ?
Shouldn ’ t the citizens as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ getting sicker and more in need of drugs and treatments , as all the evidence and statistics tell us ?
Now before anybody starts saying I ’ m knocking our health care workers , stop .
Actually , if you ’ ve gotten this far in the article , I probably don ’ t have to worry about you .
It is those who just read the headlines and then feel justified in making their outrage known on Facebook about seeing ‘ another ridiculous conspiracy theory.
’ The fact is , a bit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ admit that at some level we all know that our authority is trying to pull something on us every time they speak .
Just for the record , I believe health care is a very noble profession , with a majority of those working within the system being truly dedicated to the health and well-being of the patients they come into contact with .
However , this pandemic has not turned everybody working in health care into Florence Nightengales , as our leaders and mainstream media would have us believe .
Those who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2019 are competent and caring in 2020 during this pandemic .
Those who were incompetent and apathetic to their patients in the past have for the most part probably remained that way under the circumstances we currently face .
Like in any occupation , there are good workers and bad workers .
When a patient says ‘ thank-you ’ to a nurse or doctor for their service and care , it is spontaneous and authentic .
It is meaningful .
On the other hand , calling on the entire public to say ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ workers , in speeches and promotional ads everywhere , 24/7 , is likely staged and grounded in a very different agenda .
The sooner we see through the motives behind these attempts to tell us what to think and how to feel , the sooner we will have a society founded on truth and authenticity .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific @ @

The ‘Pandemic’ As A Social Engineering Experiment
Written by Richard Enos
When something is repeated over and over, it often has the capacity to put us to sleep. But occasionally, it has the opposite effect. Sometimes in the wake of redundant messaging our senses are aroused to a bitter taste or a stale odor that tells us something is just not right.
I had such an experience in tuning in to Ontario’s daily COVID-19 briefing today which I had done, optimistically, to see if there was any advance on when schools would be opening for my 6-year old. (no such luck). It came at the beginning of health minister Christine Elliot’s segment:
Before I begin, I would like to acknowledge and celebrate our amazing nurses, on this first day of National Nurses Week. Day and night our heroic nurses work tirelessly to care for the people of Ontario. From the bottom of my heart, thank you. Over the past few months, Ontario’s health care system has demonstrated remarkable responsiveness to the COVID-19 outbreak. That is in large part to our partners on the front lines, including our nurses, doctors, homecare, hospital and long-term care staff, personal support workers, and first-responders among many others. As we’ve confronted COVID-19, we’ve made historic investments to dramatically expand hospital capacity, and support the brave heroes working on the front lines of our healthcare system.
Elliot was literally gushing as she extolled the virtues of our health care workers. It was almost as though she had convinced herself that her plaudits were sincere.
What’s The Motive?
The surface political motive for many of our leaders to heap praise on health care workers, and encourage the public to do the same, is fairly straightforward. In thanking others, one gets to bask in the reflected glory of their accomplishments.
But upon deeper reflection, one can see that this strategy is so widely employed in the case of this pandemic because it simultaneously touches on all the bases that our authority want conveyed during their public proclamations. In fact, there are few social programming techniques that I can think of that are more powerful or effective. Let’s touch on a few of the bases ourselves:
Amplifying the Severity of the Pandemic. Through the clever sleight-of-hand of the praise of others, which the listening audience tends to take in readily with their guard down and their discernment filters on pause, the speaker is able to fully convince us of the danger we are facing, by commending health care workers for being willing to confront this danger. The more heroic we are made to think they are, the more danger that is implied. While the praise towards our fellow human beings (who are not part of the authority) makes us feel good to a certain extent, what is really being heightened in us is that low-level fear that this virus is lurking, ready to pounce on us at any misstep. A public that is in this state of fear is much easier to control and manipulate.
Legitimizing Western medicine. Listen to her terminology. ‘our partners on the front lines…the brave heroes working on the front lines.’ Why ‘Front lines’? Why is health care a ‘fight,’ always some kind of ‘war’? Because this has been the pre-eminent strategy of Western medicine all along–to make us feel that there has been an enemy invasion (a virus). To make us feel that our body does not have the necessary defense mechanisms (Western medicine virtually ignores our immune system). To make us feel that we are under attack, need protection, and the army of doctors and researchers spawned from Western medical school is our only hope (of course this is why traditional medicine, which works in concert with the immune system, has for so long been labelled quackery and pseudoscience).
Reinforcing government authority. In praising the health care workers and the system they operate within, our authority is actually reinforcing its own praiseworthiness without saying it directly. Instead, the government is seen as the benevolent manager of the whole process, ‘partnering’ with those laudable heroes in the health care system. So when the government brags that they’ve ‘made historic investments to dramatically expand hospital capacity,’ should we be standing up and applauding? Or should we be asking, if this whole government-medical system partnership is working so well, shouldn’t we be seeing a reduction in hospital beds instead of a constant increase? Shouldn’t the citizens as a whole be getting healthier, rather than getting sicker and more in need of drugs and treatments, as all the evidence and statistics tell us?
Nobody’s Knocking Our Health Care Workers
Now before anybody starts saying I’m knocking our health care workers, stop. Actually, if you’ve gotten this far in the article, I probably don’t have to worry about you. It is those who just read the headlines and then feel justified in making their outrage known on Facebook about seeing ‘another ridiculous conspiracy theory.’ The fact is, a bit of honest reflection will force us to admit that at some level we all know that our authority is trying to pull something on us every time they speak.
Just for the record, I believe health care is a very noble profession, with a majority of those working within the system being truly dedicated to the health and well-being of the patients they come into contact with.
However, this pandemic has not turned everybody working in health care into Florence Nightengales, as our leaders and mainstream media would have us believe. Those who were competent and caring in 2018 and 2019 are competent and caring in 2020 during this pandemic. Those who were incompetent and apathetic to their patients in the past have for the most part probably remained that way under the circumstances we currently face. Like in any occupation, there are good workers and bad workers. When a patient says ‘thank-you’ to a nurse or doctor for their service and care, it is spontaneous and authentic. It is meaningful. On the other hand, calling on the entire public to say ‘thank you’ to all health care workers, in speeches and promotional ads everywhere, 24/7, is likely staged and grounded in a very different agenda.
The Takeaway
The sooner we see through the motives behind these attempts to tell us what to think and how to feel, the sooner we will have a society founded on truth and authenticity.
Read more at www.collective-evolution.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-22--Calls to add ‘climate change’ to death certificates

Professors in academia are touting a new study that is being used to call for “ climate change ” to be added as a cause of death on death certificates .
“ Climate change is a killer , but we don ’ t acknowledge it on death certificates , ” co-author Dr. Arnagretta Hunter , from The Australian National University ( ANU ) Medical School , said .
The study was published May 20 , 2020 in The Lancet Planetary Health .
Given the focus on COVID-19 infection rates and death tolls , it appears the climate activists in academia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ emotional death toll counts in order to draw attention back to their climate cause .
“ There is second component on a death certificate which allows for pre-existing conditions and other factors .
“ If you have an asthma attack and die during heavy smoke exposure from bushfires , the death certificate should include that information.
” “ We can make a diagnosis of disease like coronavirus , but we are less literate in environmental determinants like hot weather or bushfire smoke.
” … “ Climate change is the single greatest health threat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recover from coronavirus , ” Dr. Hunter said .
“ Death certification needs to be modernized , indirect causes should be reported , with all death certification prompting for external factors contributing to death , and these death data must be coupled with large-scale environmental datasets so that impact assessments can be done.
” But the climate skeptic blog Tallbloke was not receptive to claims that “ climate change ” should be added to death certificates .
“ Climate alarmists yet again strain credulity to the limit , no doubt hoping to stir @ @ @ @ @ @ @ use , ” the blog noted .
A comment on the Tallbloke blog also ridiculed the study ’ s claims , noting : “ Australia must have a lot of health threats if the ‘ single greatest ’ one accounts for 2 % of the mortality rate.
” If “ climate change ” becomes a cause of death listed on birth certificates , it could result in some interesting reading .
Many climate activists have claimed that “ global warming ” will lead to cannibalism .
See : Warnings of climate cannibalism are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ warned that AGW survivors ‘ will be cannibals ’ & Paul Ehrlich warned in 2014 that ‘ climate change ’ will force humans to ‘ eat bodies of dead ’ Recent scientific research has countered the claims of a climate change and health threat .
Heat-related deaths have been “ substantially underreported ” on Australia ’ s national records , according to experts from The Australian National University ( ANU ) .
Researchers say the amount of deaths attributed to excessive natural heat is at least 50 times more than recorded on death @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Health , figures show over the past 11 years 340 deaths in Australia were recorded as being due to excessive heat but statistical analysis found 36,765 deaths could have been attributed to heat .
“ Climate change is a killer , but we don ’ t acknowledge it on death certificates , ” co-author Dr Arnagretta Hunter , from the ANU Medical School , said .
“ There is second component on a death certificate which allows for pre-existing conditions and other factors .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Calls to add ‘climate change’ to death certificates
Written by Marc Morano
Professors in academia are touting a new study that is being used to call for “climate change” to be added as a cause of death on death certificates. “Climate change is a killer, but we don’t acknowledge it on death certificates,” co-author Dr. Arnagretta Hunter, from The Australian National University (ANU) Medical School, said. The study was published May 20, 2020 in The Lancet Planetary Health.
Given the focus on COVID-19 infection rates and death tolls, it appears the climate activists in academia may want in on the scary and emotional death toll counts in order to draw attention back to their climate cause.
Hunter explained:
“There is second component on a death certificate which allows for pre-existing conditions and other factors. “If you have an asthma attack and die during heavy smoke exposure from bushfires, the death certificate should include that information.” “We can make a diagnosis of disease like coronavirus, but we are less literate in environmental determinants like hot weather or bushfire smoke.” … “Climate change is the single greatest health threat that we face globally even after we recover from coronavirus,” Dr. Hunter said.
The study claims:
“Death certification needs to be modernized, indirect causes should be reported, with all death certification prompting for external factors contributing to death, and these death data must be coupled with large-scale environmental datasets so that impact assessments can be done.”
Statistician Dr. Matt Briggs reacted this way:
“They discovered a way to boost fear and keep control!” Briggs added, “Daily body counts blasted from the evil media, ‘Over 100 people died from climate change today, raising questions about … blah blah…’”
Staff Sergeant Briggs @FamedCelebrity They discovered a way to boost fear and keep control! Simple, too. Just add “climate change” to death certificates. https://www.climatedepot.com Daily body counts blasted from the evil media, “Over 100 people died from climate change today, raising questions about … blah blah…” 21 Twitter Ads info and privacy 20 people are talking about this
But the climate skeptic blog Tallbloke was not receptive to claims that “climate change” should be added to death certificates. “Climate alarmists yet again strain credulity to the limit, no doubt hoping to stir up guilt in the populace about energy use,” the blog noted.
A comment on the Tallbloke blog also ridiculed the study’s claims, noting: “Australia must have a lot of health threats if the ‘single greatest’ one accounts for 2{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of the mortality rate.”
Climate fueled Cannibalism?
If “climate change” becomes a cause of death listed on birth certificates, it could result in some interesting reading. Many climate activists have claimed that “global warming” will lead to cannibalism. See:Warnings of climate cannibalism are nothing new: Ted Turner in 2008 warned that AGW survivors ‘will be cannibals’ & Paul Ehrlich warned in 2014 that ‘climate change’ will force humans to ‘eat bodies of dead’
Recent scientific research has countered the claims of a climate change and health threat.
Full ANU University press release below:
https://www.anu.edu.au/news/all-news/calls-to-add-{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}E2{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}80{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}98climate-change{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}E2{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}80{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}99-to-death-certificates
Heat-related deaths have been “substantially underreported” on Australia’s national records, according to experts from The Australian National University (ANU). Researchers say the amount of deaths attributed to excessive natural heat is at least 50 times more than recorded on death certificates. Published in The Lancet Planetary Health, figures show over the past 11 years 340 deaths in Australia were recorded as being due to excessive heat but statistical analysis found 36,765 deaths could have been attributed to heat. “Climate change is a killer, but we don’t acknowledge it on death certificates,” co-author Dr Arnagretta Hunter, from the ANU Medical School, said. “There is second component on a death certificate which allows for pre-existing conditions and other factors.
Read more at www.climatedepot.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-22--Media-Touted Hurricane ‘Study’ Is Junk Science

The media are breathlessly touting a cheap new “ study ” falsely asserting climate change is causing an increase in strong hurricanes .
In reality , the study relies on deception , unethical data manipulation , and aggressive misrepresentation of quite normal short-term trends to support its false claim .
The study , published by government-employed and government-funded researchers whose jobs and income depend on the perpetuation of the alarmist Climate Delusion , has been reported – without any critical examination – by the New York Times , Washington Post , The Weather Channel , and others .
The Environmental @ @ @ @ @ @ @ study to raise money for itself .
The headline for the Washington Post article tells us what the alarmists are peddling in this new study : “ The strongest , most dangerous hurricanes are now far more likely because of climate change , study shows.
” The truth , as shown by objective scientific facts , is quite different .
The study ’ s authors report that an examination of tropical storms that formed between 1979 and 2017 indicates that after the first half of the 39-year time period , the chance of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a major hurricane ( category 3 or higher ) rose by 8 percent in each of the latter two decades .
As an initial matter , the authors are dubiously claiming that merely 20 years of a minor variation in hurricane numbers is sufficient to prove a substantial long-term trend and a definitive link to climate change as the causal factor .
This is a preposterous claim to make for such a short time period .
For example , objective data – as shown in the graph below – show that over a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the frequency of hurricanes declined significantly and the frequency of major hurricanes did not increase at all .
This was also during a period of global warming .
Why is that 25-year period irrelevant when it is so similar in time and length to the authors ’ cherry-picked 29-year period ?
The fact is , there will always be natural and largely random variation in the frequency of hurricanes , tornadoes , floods , droughts , etc.
, within periods of just a few decades .
Second , the data show essentially no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ since the early 1990s .
Any claim of more frequent recent hurricanes requires cherry-picking the abnormally quiet 1980s as the baseline for comparison rather than the past 30 years , during which there has been no trend .
The fact that the 1980s were quieter than the 1990s is largely relevant to the assertion that global warming is currently causing an increase in strong hurricanes .
On the contrary , the lack of any increase during the past 30 years is much more relevant .
Third , and perhaps most importantly , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact that the authors are reporting on the percentage of tropical storms that become major hurricanes rather than the raw number of major hurricanes .
Objective data – as shown in the chart below – show that the number of tropical storms has been declining throughout the time period of the authors ’ study .
So , the authors and the media can technically claim that the percentage of tropical storms that become major hurricanes is growing , even while there is no increase in the overall number of major hurricanes .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hurricanes is largely irrelevant if the overall number of major hurricanes stays the same .
If anything , the new study simply illustrates that fewer tropical storms are forming , which would largely be seen as a beneficial climate development .
Fourth and finally , media outlets like the Washington Post even misrepresent the misleading and cherry-picked conclusions of the authors ’ study .
As noted , the authors note a very minor increase in the percentage of tropical storms that become hurricanes , even while the overall frequency of major hurricanes has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Compare that to the Washington Post ’ s headline assertion that “ The strongest , most dangerous hurricanes are now far more likely.
” Strong hurricanes are not more likely at all , let alone “ far ” more likely .
The new study , and its accompanying media coverage , represent a perfect example of the horse-dung sensationalism that climate alarmists tell us is “ settled science.
” The only settled science is that alarmists will go to incredible lengths to manipulate and misrepresent objective scientific facts for the cause of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Media-Touted Hurricane ‘Study’ Is Junk Science
Written by James Taylor
The media are breathlessly touting a cheap new “study” falsely asserting climate change is causing an increase in strong hurricanes.
In reality, the study relies on deception, unethical data manipulation, and aggressive misrepresentation of quite normal short-term trends to support its false claim.
The study, published by government-employed and government-funded researchers whose jobs and income depend on the perpetuation of the alarmist Climate Delusion, has been reported – without any critical examination – by the New York Times, Washington Post, The Weather Channel, and others.
The Environmental Defense Fund is even using the new study to raise money for itself.
The headline for the Washington Post article tells us what the alarmists are peddling in this new study: “The strongest, most dangerous hurricanes are now far more likely because of climate change, study shows.”
The truth, as shown by objective scientific facts, is quite different.
The study’s authors report that an examination of tropical storms that formed between 1979 and 2017 indicates that after the first half of the 39-year time period, the chance of a given tropical storm growing to become a major hurricane (category 3 or higher) rose by 8 percent in each of the latter two decades.
As an initial matter, the authors are dubiously claiming that merely 20 years of a minor variation in hurricane numbers is sufficient to prove a substantial long-term trend and a definitive link to climate change as the causal factor.
This is a preposterous claim to make for such a short time period.
For example, objective data – as shown in the graph below – show that over a 25-year period from 1992 through 2014, the frequency of hurricanes declined significantly and the frequency of major hurricanes did not increase at all.
This was also during a period of global warming. Why is that 25-year period irrelevant when it is so similar in time and length to the authors’ cherry-picked 29-year period?
The fact is, there will always be natural and largely random variation in the frequency of hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, droughts, etc., within periods of just a few decades.
Second, the data show essentially no change in the frequency of major hurricanes since the early 1990s.
Any claim of more frequent recent hurricanes requires cherry-picking the abnormally quiet 1980s as the baseline for comparison rather than the past 30 years, during which there has been no trend.
The fact that the 1980s were quieter than the 1990s is largely relevant to the assertion that global warming is currently causing an increase in strong hurricanes.
On the contrary, the lack of any increase during the past 30 years is much more relevant.
Third, and perhaps most importantly, the authors and their media sock-puppets bury the fact that the authors are reporting on the percentage of tropical storms that become major hurricanes rather than the raw number of major hurricanes.
Objective data – as shown in the chart below – show that the number of tropical storms has been declining throughout the time period of the authors’ study.
So, the authors and the media can technically claim that the percentage of tropical storms that become major hurricanes is growing, even while there is no increase in the overall number of major hurricanes.
The percentage of tropical storms that become major hurricanes is largely irrelevant if the overall number of major hurricanes stays the same.
If anything, the new study simply illustrates that fewer tropical storms are forming, which would largely be seen as a beneficial climate development.
Fourth and finally, media outlets like the Washington Post even misrepresent the misleading and cherry-picked conclusions of the authors’ study.
As noted, the authors note a very minor increase in the percentage of tropical storms that become hurricanes, even while the overall frequency of major hurricanes has not increased during the past 30 years.
Compare that to the Washington Post’s headline assertion that “The strongest, most dangerous hurricanes are now far more likely.”
Strong hurricanes are not more likely at all, let alone “far” more likely.
The new study, and its accompanying media coverage, represent a perfect example of the horse-dung sensationalism that climate alarmists tell us is “settled science.”
The only settled science is that alarmists will go to incredible lengths to manipulate and misrepresent objective scientific facts for the cause of promoting their alarmist Climate Delusion.
Read more at Climate Realism
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-22--The Science that Shows Why Masks FAIL Against COVID-19

The Science that Shows Why Masks FAIL Against COVID-19 When digging into the scientific literature you will discover that masks are neither safe nor effective .
So , as schools prepare to create policies for children returning to school in the fall , we must keep these things in mind .
The following scientific evidence shows why masks are ineffective and risky , so stop calling us selfish for declining to wear them .
In Epidemics 2017 , a meta-analysis concluded that masks had a non-significant protective effect .
In the Annuals of Internal Medicine , April 2020 , “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ SARS-CoV-2 during coughs by affected people.
” According to a University of New South Wales , the widespread use of masks by healthcare workers may put them at increased risk of respiratory illness and viral infections , and their global use should be discouraged .
In the British Medical Journal 2015 , “ Over three times , the risk of contracting influenza-like illness if a cloth mask is used versus no mask at all.
” Contaminated masks and masks holding moisture and pathogen retention can increase the risk of infection .
A 2016 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ & Environmental Epidemiology found 97 % of particles penetrated cloth masks , and 44 % of particles penetrated medical masks .
They reported that cloth masks are only marginally beneficial in protecting individuals from particles less than 2.5 micrometers .
As referenced in the New England Journal of Medicine , the size of Coronavirus particles varied between 0.06 micrometers and 0.14 micrometers .
Cloth and surgical masks do not have a fit test .
When worn , gaps around the edges allow small particles to enter the respiratory system .
Also , according @ @ @ @ @ @ @ One , lack of eye protection was a primary risk factor of SARS-CoV transmission .
Wearing a mask for seven hours straight may not be safe .
Carbon dioxide ( CO2 ) rebreathing has been recognized as a concern in the Ergonomics Journal .
The CDC has also admitted that the CO2 slowly builds up in the mask over time .
This build-up can cause a condition called Hypercapnia .
Essentially , CO2 poisoning – can cause mild symptoms of drowsiness or a headache .
More severe symptoms can cause shortness of breath @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , 2020 , the New York Post reported the death of two boys dying within a week of each other while wearing a face mask during gym class .
In February , the CDC said they don ’ t recommend people use face masks .
The World Health Organization also advised people to wear a mask only if they are displaying symptoms of Coronavirus or “ taking care of a person with a suspected 2019-nCoV infection.
” There is zero scientific evidence that wearing a mask , especially for more extended periods , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ found significant problems with wearing one .
Side-effects range from headaches to increased airway resistance , carbon dioxide accumulation , hypoxia , to more severe complications .
In the Head and Neck Pain Journal , most healthcare workers develop de novo PPE‐associated headaches or exacerbation of their pre‐existing headache disorders .
When a person is infected with a respiratory virus , they will expel some of the virus with each breath .
Wearing a mask creates a situation in which the individual continually breathes back in their viruses—breathing viruses back in raises the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and nasal passages .
It has been studied that those with a higher number of viral particles can develop a more severe illness .
A recent study out of China published in the Lancet Journal reported a strong association between Covid19 disease severity and the amount of virus present in the nose .
The Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control Journal demonstrated , “ Breathing through N95 mask materials have been shown to impede gaseous exchange and impose an additional workload on the metabolic system of pregnant healthcare workers .
The benefits of using @ @ @ @ @ @ @ infectious diseases should be weighed against potential respiratory consequences associated with extended N95 respirator usage .
Wearing a mask could put you at a greater risk of getting Covid19 .
Regular cloth or surgical masks , irritate the user , causing the user to touch their face with dirty hands more often .
Also , the Coronavirus spreads in droplets , which most masks do not block .
These masks can actually trap droplets inside , increasing risk instead of reducing it .
Masks also hamper oxygen intake ; the body and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to feed cells and fight off illness , including Covid19 .
When studied , surgeons who wore surgical masks had a decrease in blood O2 saturation and an increase in pulse rates of the surgeons after the operations due to surgical mask usage .
According to the Journal of Biomedicines , our oxygen concentration is closely associated with cell survival and immune functioning , making one more susceptible to illness .
Masks can cause difficulty and labored breathing – even in a healthy individual .
Blocking air even partially puts excess stress on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a person to feel out of breath .
Wearing a mask can also make a person feel anxiety and panic .
Claustrophobia and a feeling of suffocation must be acknowledged , especially among individuals who have Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and other mental health issues .
So , in summary , mask-wearing can be dangerous and is shown over and over again to be ineffective .
It appears masks are more effective in helping to spread illness , by providing a surface for viruses to collect on , like carrying a petri dish in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Americans with Disabilities Act , if wearing a mask poses a mental or physical risk , there are exemptions .
So please don ’ t mandate them to attend school , and please don ’ t teach the masses to hate and shame those that do not comply .
This conditioning leads people to be more willing to follow irrational orders and do things without questioning authority , or logic , in the future .
When there is a risk , there should always be a choice .
About the author : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Therapist , and Author of Healing Without Hurting bringing my findings on how to treat ADHD , autism , apraxia and more without medication to you and your family .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

The Science that Shows Why Masks FAIL Against COVID-19
Written by Jennifer Giustra-Kozek, LPC, NBCC
When digging into the scientific literature you will discover that masks are neither safe nor effective. So, as schools prepare to create policies for children returning to school in the fall, we must keep these things in mind.
The following scientific evidence shows why masks are ineffective and risky, so stop calling us selfish for declining to wear them.
In Epidemics 2017, a meta-analysis concluded that masks had a non-significant protective effect. In the Annuals of Internal Medicine, April 2020, “neither surgical nor cotton masks effectively filtered SARS-CoV-2 during coughs by affected people.”
According to a University of New South Wales, the widespread use of masks by healthcare workers may put them at increased risk of respiratory illness and viral infections, and their global use should be discouraged.
In the British Medical Journal 2015, “Over three times, the risk of contracting influenza-like illness if a cloth mask is used versus no mask at all.” Contaminated masks and masks holding moisture and pathogen retention can increase the risk of infection.
A 2016 study in the Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology found 97{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of particles penetrated cloth masks, and 44{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of particles penetrated medical masks. They reported that cloth masks are only marginally beneficial in protecting individuals from particles less than 2.5 micrometers. As referenced in the New England Journal of Medicine, the size of Coronavirus particles varied between 0.06 micrometers and 0.14 micrometers.
Cloth and surgical masks do not have a fit test. When worn, gaps around the edges allow small particles to enter the respiratory system. Also, according to the May 2010 edition of PLoS One, lack of eye protection was a primary risk factor of SARS-CoV transmission.
Wearing a mask for seven hours straight may not be safe. Carbon dioxide (CO2) rebreathing has been recognized as a concern in the Ergonomics Journal. The CDC has also admitted that the CO2 slowly builds up in the mask over time. This build-up can cause a condition called Hypercapnia. Essentially, CO2 poisoning – can cause mild symptoms of drowsiness or a headache. More severe symptoms can cause shortness of breath and even death. On May 6th, 2020, the New York Post reported the death of two boys dying within a week of each other while wearing a face mask during gym class.
In February, the CDC said they don’t recommend people use face masks. The World Health Organization also advised people to wear a mask only if they are displaying symptoms of Coronavirus or “taking care of a person with a suspected 2019-nCoV infection.”
There is zero scientific evidence that wearing a mask, especially for more extended periods, protects us. However, several studies found significant problems with wearing one. Side-effects range from headaches to increased airway resistance, carbon dioxide accumulation, hypoxia, to more severe complications.
In the Head and Neck Pain Journal, most healthcare workers develop de novo PPE‐associated headaches or exacerbation of their pre‐existing headache disorders.
When a person is infected with a respiratory virus, they will expel some of the virus with each breath. Wearing a mask creates a situation in which the individual continually breathes back in their viruses—breathing viruses back in raises the concentration of the virus in the lungs and nasal passages. It has been studied that those with a higher number of viral particles can develop a more severe illness. A recent study out of China published in the Lancet Journal reported a strong association between Covid19 disease severity and the amount of virus present in the nose.
The Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control Journal demonstrated, “Breathing through N95 mask materials have been shown to impede gaseous exchange and impose an additional workload on the metabolic system of pregnant healthcare workers. The benefits of using an N95 mask to prevent serious emerging infectious diseases should be weighed against potential respiratory consequences associated with extended N95 respirator usage.
Wearing a mask could put you at a greater risk of getting Covid19. Regular cloth or surgical masks, irritate the user, causing the user to touch their face with dirty hands more often. Also, the Coronavirus spreads in droplets, which most masks do not block. These masks can actually trap droplets inside, increasing risk instead of reducing it.
Masks also hamper oxygen intake; the body and the immune system require optimal levels of oxygen to feed cells and fight off illness, including Covid19. When studied, surgeons who wore surgical masks had a decrease in blood O2 saturation and an increase in pulse rates of the surgeons after the operations due to surgical mask usage.
According to the Journal of Biomedicines, our oxygen concentration is closely associated with cell survival and immune functioning, making one more susceptible to illness.
Masks can cause difficulty and labored breathing – even in a healthy individual. Blocking air even partially puts excess stress on thoracic muscles and the diaphragm, causing a person to feel out of breath. Wearing a mask can also make a person feel anxiety and panic. Claustrophobia and a feeling of suffocation must be acknowledged, especially among individuals who have Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and other mental health issues.
So, in summary, mask-wearing can be dangerous and is shown over and over again to be ineffective. It appears masks are more effective in helping to spread illness, by providing a surface for viruses to collect on, like carrying a petri dish in front of your face.
According to the Americans with Disabilities Act, if wearing a mask poses a mental or physical risk, there are exemptions. So please don’t mandate them to attend school, and please don’t teach the masses to hate and shame those that do not comply.
This conditioning leads people to be more willing to follow irrational orders and do things without questioning authority, or logic, in the future. When there is a risk, there should always be a choice.
About the author: Jennifer Giustra-Kozek, LPC, NBCC Mother, Therapist, and Author of Healing Without Hurting bringing my findings on how to treat ADHD, autism, apraxia and more without medication to you and your family.
Read more at www.collective-evolution.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related