principiascientificinternational--2020-06-16--British Columbia Breaks Cold And Snow Records

Record cold and late-spring snow helped drive-home the Grand Solar Minimum message across the BC Interior over the weekend .
According to KelownaNow Meteorologist Wesla English , the Interior –one of the three main regions of the Canadian province of British Columbia– broke a slew of cold records on Saturday .
Kelowna , Kamloops , Clearwater , Penticton , Salmon Arm , and Vernon were among the areas to set new all-time record low-max temperatures for June 13 .
“ A cool upper low over Southern BC produced chilly temperatures on Saturday , breaking record low daytime highs in several @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a breakdown of the records ( data courtesy of Environment and Climate Change Canada , and originally reported by kelownanow.com ) : • Kelowna set a new daily record min-high of 12.8C on Saturday , a reading comfortably topping the previous record of 13.3C set in 1981 .
• Kamloops saw its all-time record low smashed , from 1923 ’ s 15C to this weekend ’ s 13.4C .
• But it was Salmon Arm that actually saw the biggest change — Saturday ’ s low-max of 12.4C crushed the old record @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 13.9C set at Penticton pipped the previous record — 1981 ’ s 14C .
In addition to the cold , this weekend delivered rare late-spring snow to BC , adding to Ontario ’ s record June snowfall last weekend that brought power outages to parts of the province .
Wet snow accumulated near the summit of the Okanagan Connector between Merritt and Kelowna on Sunday , causing Environment and Climate Change Canada to issue a special weather statement for Nicola and Okanagan Valley .
All this cold and snow is negatively impacting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ last year when planting was the most-delayed on record .
A recent report from agricensus.com warns that “ cold weather is slowing emerging Canada crops ” .
The COLD TIMES are returning in line with historically low solar activity , cloud-nucleating Cosmic Rays , and a meridional jetstream flow .
Even NASA agrees , in part at least , with their forecast for this upcoming solar cycle ( 25 ) seeing it as “ the weakest of the past 200 years , ” with the agency correlating previous solar shutdowns to prolonged periods @ @ @ @ @ @ @ INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

British Columbia Breaks Cold And Snow Records
Written by Cap Allon
Record cold and late-spring snow helped drive-home the Grand Solar Minimum message across the BC Interior over the weekend.
According to KelownaNow Meteorologist Wesla English, the Interior –one of the three main regions of the Canadian province of British Columbia– broke a slew of cold records on Saturday.
Kelowna, Kamloops, Clearwater, Penticton, Salmon Arm, and Vernon were among the areas to set new all-time record low-max temperatures for June 13.
“A cool upper low over Southern BC produced chilly temperatures on Saturday, breaking record low daytime highs in several areas,” wrote English.
Below is a breakdown of the records (data courtesy of Environment and Climate Change Canada, and originally reported by kelownanow.com):
Kelowna set a new daily record min-high of 12.8C on Saturday, a reading comfortably topping the previous record of 13.3C set in 1981.
set a new daily record min-high of on Saturday, a reading comfortably topping the previous record of 13.3C set in 1981. Kamloops saw its all-time record low smashed, from 1923’s 15C to this weekend’s 13.4C .
saw its all-time record low smashed, from 1923’s 15C to this weekend’s . But it was Salmon Arm that actually saw the biggest change — Saturday’s low-max of 12.4C crushed the old record of 14.4C from 1971.
that actually saw the biggest change — Saturday’s low-max of crushed the old record of 14.4C from 1971. Clearwater’s 12.8C busted the 13.3C from 1966.
busted the 13.3C from 1966. While the 13.9C set at Penticton pipped the previous record — 1981’s 14C.
In addition to the cold, this weekend delivered rare late-spring snow to BC, adding to Ontario’s record June snowfall last weekend that brought power outages to parts of the province.
Wet snow accumulated near the summit of the Okanagan Connector between Merritt and Kelowna on Sunday, causing Environment and Climate Change Canada to issue a special weather statement for Nicola and Okanagan Valley.
“June-uary continues!” reads a tweet issued by @ECCCWeatherBC:
All this cold and snow is negatively impacting Canadian farmers, just as it did last year when planting was the most-delayed on record. A recent report from agricensus.com warns that “cold weather is slowing emerging Canada crops”.
The COLD TIMES are returning in line with historically low solar activity, cloud-nucleating Cosmic Rays, and a meridional jetstream flow.
Even NASA agrees, in part at least, with their forecast for this upcoming solar cycle (25) seeing it as “the weakest of the past 200 years,” with the agency correlating previous solar shutdowns to prolonged periods of global cooling here.
Read more at ElectroVerse
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-06-16--Unexpected widespread structures discovered near Earth’s core

University of Maryland geophysicists analyzed thousands of recordings of seismic waves , sound waves traveling through the Earth , to identify echoes from the boundary between Earth ’ s molten core and the solid mantle layer above it .
The echoes revealed more widespread , heterogenous structures—areas of unusually dense , hot rock—at the core-mantle boundary than previously known .
Scientists are unsure of the composition of these structures , and previous studies have provided only a limited view of them .
Better understanding their shape and extent can help reveal the geologic processes happening deep inside Earth .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of plate tectonics and the evolution of our planet .
The new research provides the first comprehensive view of the core-mantle boundary over a wide area with such detailed resolution .
The study was published in the June 12 , 2020 , issue of the journal Science .
The researchers focused on echoes of seismic waves traveling beneath the Pacific Ocean basin .
Their analysis revealed a previously unknown structure beneath the volcanic Marquesas Islands in the South Pacific and showed that the structure beneath the Hawaiian Islands is much larger than previously @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of core-mantle boundary echoes at once , instead of focusing on a few at a time , as is usually done , we have gotten a totally new perspective , ” said Doyeon Kim , a postdoctoral fellow in the UMD Department of Geology and the lead author of the paper .
“ This is showing us that the core-mantle boundary region has lots of structures that can produce these echoes , and that was something we didn ’ t realize before because we only had a narrow view.
” Earthquakes generate seismic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ travel thousands of miles .
When the waves encounter changes in rock density , temperature or composition , they change speed , bend or scatter , producing echoes that can be detected .
Echoes from nearby structures arrive more quickly , while those from larger structures are louder .
By measuring the travel time and amplitude of these echoes as they arrive at seismometers in different locations , scientists can develop models of the physical properties of rock hidden below the surface .
This process is similar to the way bats echolocate to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Kim and his colleagues looked for echoes generated by a specific type of wave , called a shear wave , as it travels along the core-mantle boundary .
In a recording from a single earthquake , known as a seismogram , echoes from diffracted shear waves can be hard to distinguish from random noise .
But looking at many seismograms from many earthquakes at once can reveal similarities and patterns that identify the echoes hidden in the data .
Using a machine learning algorithm called Sequencer , the researchers analyzed 7,000 seismograms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and greater occurring around the Pacific Ocean basin from 1990 to 2018 .
Sequencer was developed by the new study ’ s co-authors from Johns Hopkins University and Tel Aviv University to find patterns in radiation from distant stars and galaxies .
When applied to seismograms from earthquakes , the algorithm discovered a large number of shear wave echoes .
“ Machine learning in earth science is growing rapidly and a method like Sequencer allows us to be able to systematically detect seismic echoes and get new insights into the structures at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ remained largely enigmatic , ” Kim said .
The study revealed a few surprises in the structure of the core-mantle boundary .
“ We found echoes on about 40 % of all seismic wave paths , ” said Vedran Lekic , an associate professor of geology at UMD and a co-author of the study .
“ That was surprising because we were expecting them to be more rare , and what that means is the anomalous structures at the core-mantle boundary are much more widespread than previously thought.
” The scientists found that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hot material at the core-mantle boundary beneath Hawaii produced uniquely loud echoes , indicating that it is even larger than previous estimates .
Known as ultralow-velocity zones ( ULVZs ) , such patches are found at the roots of volcanic plumes , where hot rock rises from the core-mantle boundary region to produce volcanic islands .
The ULVZ beneath Hawaii is the largest known .
This study also found a previously unknown ULVZ beneath the Marquesas Islands .
“ We were surprised to find such a big feature beneath the Marquesas Islands that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ before , ” Lekic said .
“ This is really exciting , because it shows how the Sequencer algorithm can help us to contextualize seismogram data across the globe in a way we couldn ’ t before .
”

Unexpected widespread structures discovered near Earth’s core
Written by University of Maryland
University of Maryland geophysicists analyzed thousands of recordings of seismic waves, sound waves traveling through the Earth, to identify echoes from the boundary between Earth’s molten core and the solid mantle layer above it.
The echoes revealed more widespread, heterogenous structures—areas of unusually dense, hot rock—at the core-mantle boundary than previously known.
Scientists are unsure of the composition of these structures, and previous studies have provided only a limited view of them. Better understanding their shape and extent can help reveal the geologic processes happening deep inside Earth. This knowledge may provide clues to the workings of plate tectonics and the evolution of our planet.
The new research provides the first comprehensive view of the core-mantle boundary over a wide area with such detailed resolution. The study was published in the June 12, 2020, issue of the journal Science.
The researchers focused on echoes of seismic waves traveling beneath the Pacific Ocean basin. Their analysis revealed a previously unknown structure beneath the volcanic Marquesas Islands in the South Pacific and showed that the structure beneath the Hawaiian Islands is much larger than previously known.
“By looking at thousands of core-mantle boundary echoes at once, instead of focusing on a few at a time, as is usually done, we have gotten a totally new perspective,” said Doyeon Kim, a postdoctoral fellow in the UMD Department of Geology and the lead author of the paper. “This is showing us that the core-mantle boundary region has lots of structures that can produce these echoes, and that was something we didn’t realize before because we only had a narrow view.”
The above image shows how areas of hot, dense rock called ultralow-velocity zones deep inside the earth bend and diffract sound waves produced by earthquakes. In a new analysis of the diffracted waves recorded by seismograms, UMD geologists reveal a new ULVZ under Marquesas and a bigger ULVZ beneath Hawaii than previously known. Credit: Doyeon Kim/University of Maryland
Earthquakes generate seismic waves below Earth’s surface that travel thousands of miles. When the waves encounter changes in rock density, temperature or composition, they change speed, bend or scatter, producing echoes that can be detected. Echoes from nearby structures arrive more quickly, while those from larger structures are louder. By measuring the travel time and amplitude of these echoes as they arrive at seismometers in different locations, scientists can develop models of the physical properties of rock hidden below the surface. This process is similar to the way bats echolocate to map their environment.
For this study, Kim and his colleagues looked for echoes generated by a specific type of wave, called a shear wave, as it travels along the core-mantle boundary. In a recording from a single earthquake, known as a seismogram, echoes from diffracted shear waves can be hard to distinguish from random noise. But looking at many seismograms from many earthquakes at once can reveal similarities and patterns that identify the echoes hidden in the data.
Using a machine learning algorithm called Sequencer, the researchers analyzed 7,000 seismograms from hundreds of earthquakes of 6.5 magnitude and greater occurring around the Pacific Ocean basin from 1990 to 2018. Sequencer was developed by the new study’s co-authors from Johns Hopkins University and Tel Aviv University to find patterns in radiation from distant stars and galaxies. When applied to seismograms from earthquakes, the algorithm discovered a large number of shear wave echoes.
“Machine learning in earth science is growing rapidly and a method like Sequencer allows us to be able to systematically detect seismic echoes and get new insights into the structures at the base of the mantle, which have remained largely enigmatic,” Kim said.
The study revealed a few surprises in the structure of the core-mantle boundary.
Earthquakes, seen as yellow stars here, send sound waves through the Earth. Seismograms, seen as blue triangles here, record the echoes as those waves travel along the core-mantle boundary, diffracting and bending around dense rock structures. New research from University of Maryland provides the first broad view of these structures, revealing them to be much more widespread than previously known. Credit: Doyeon Kim/University of Maryland
“We found echoes on about 40{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of all seismic wave paths,” said Vedran Lekic, an associate professor of geology at UMD and a co-author of the study. “That was surprising because we were expecting them to be more rare, and what that means is the anomalous structures at the core-mantle boundary are much more widespread than previously thought.”
The scientists found that the large patch of very dense, hot material at the core-mantle boundary beneath Hawaii produced uniquely loud echoes, indicating that it is even larger than previous estimates. Known as ultralow-velocity zones (ULVZs), such patches are found at the roots of volcanic plumes, where hot rock rises from the core-mantle boundary region to produce volcanic islands. The ULVZ beneath Hawaii is the largest known.
This study also found a previously unknown ULVZ beneath the Marquesas Islands.
“We were surprised to find such a big feature beneath the Marquesas Islands that we didn’t even know existed before,” Lekic said. “This is really exciting, because it shows how the Sequencer algorithm can help us to contextualize seismogram data across the globe in a way we couldn’t before.”
More information: “Sequencing seismograms: A panoptic view of scattering in the core-mantle boundary region” Science (2020). Journal information: Science **** PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method. “Sequencing seismograms: A panoptic view of scattering in the core-mantle boundary region”(2020). science.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi … 1126/science.aba8972
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-06-16--COVID-19 IgM/IgG Rapid Test vs. RT-PCR: A Comparison Between Two Methods

COVID-19 IgM/IgG Rapid Test vs. RT-PCR : A Comparison Between Two Methods As the number of confirmed COVID-19 infections worldwide reached 5.6 million , with 2,430,603 recoveries and 352,225 deaths as of May 27 , the World Health Organization continues to ask for immediate action in testing all individuals suspected with COVID-19 .
WHO notes that the foundation of an effective pandemic response is the capacity to conduct mass-scale testing .
The Director-General of the World Health Organization , Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus , said that all countries should prioritize testing for the virus .
He also pointed out the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ efforts and isolation of infected individuals .
There are two primary types of testing methods currently in use today .
The first test is called the IgM/IgG Rapid Test , while the second one is called the polymerase chain reaction test ( RT-PCR ) .
Below are several characteristics that set the two tests apart .
The IgM/IgG Rapid Test Kit produces fast results .
However , rather than identifying the genetic materials making up the novel coronavirus , the IgM/IgG Rapid Test detects the presence of antibodies in a person ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ test used ?
First , licensed medical professionals must extract blood from a probable COVID-19 patient .
Then , they load the sample to the test kit , along with three drops of sample diluent .
After fifteen minutes , the kit will generate a result , and the licensed professional can interpret it .
Generally , the test kit reads for two different types of antibodies : the immunoglobulin G ( IgG ) , which is the delayed immune response , and the immunoglobulin M ( IgM ) , or the early @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in individuals who are SARS-COV-2 positive , while the IgG antibody is seen in patients who recovered from the infection .
For instance , you might show no symptoms of the COVID-19 disease yet still test positive for IgG antibodies in your system .
This might mean that you have been previously infected and generating immunity from the virus .
In this case , you need to self-isolate .
However , if you are positive for both antibodies despite showing no symptoms , you must self-isolate for fourteen days before taking another IgM/IgG @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for IgG and positive for IgM without any symptoms , it means that you are infected .
When this happens , it is best to take an RT-PCR test to confirm .
Moreover , if you test negative for both antibodies while showing no symptoms , your probability of infection is unlikely .
To be safe and sure , consider taking another antibody test after seven days .
Although IgM/IgG rapid testing kits produce quick results , the test ’ s preciseness still depends on the sensitivity of the testing kit itself .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of errors in the results .
False negatives and false positives are common with this type of testing kit .
Antibodies only progress a few weeks after the infection .
For this reason , rapid coronavirus test kits may miss it in the earliest phases of the disease .
A confirmatory RT-PCR test is needed to be performed on those who got a positive result in the rapid test .
The Polymerase Chain Reaction ( PCR ) is a common technique that has been used for about thirty years in medicine and research @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and improved version of the PCR is the reverse-transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction ( RT-PCR ) .
The RT-PCR test was first used to detect ribonucleic acid ( RNA ) strands .
Today , however , it is used to identify SARS-CoV-2 , the virus causing the COVID-19 disease .
Since RT-PCR directly tests for the presence of the virus , it became the leading test to detect infection .
RT-PCR tests are reliable and sensitive and can produce accurate results within three to four hours .
However , it will take more hours @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sent to an external laboratory .
You might be asking , ‘ how does this type of testing method work ?
’ Well , first , licensed medical workers will collect samples from a suspected COVID-19 patient .
Chemicals will be used to get rid of fats , proteins , and other molecules , thus , leaving RNA strands behind .
The strands will be a combination of a person ’ s genetic material and the viral RNA that may be present in the system .
The RT-PCR copies the RNA to DNA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ viruses through a PCR machine .
Moreover , fluorescent markers are usually used to secure the amplified DNA and supply light .
If the light ’ s intensity within the sample hits a certain threshold , then it means the sample tested positive .
Otherwise , the result is deemed negative .
It ’ s important to remember that RT-PCR testing won ’ t be able to identify if an individual had contracted the virus and recovered from it .
It only detects an active infection present in a person ’ s system @ @ @ @ @ @ @ alike , with each having its own set of advantages and disadvantages .
Despite the different methods each one uses , these kits are still necessary to fight the spread of the virus .
However , there ’ s currently a shortage of test kits available .
Hence , a hierarchy must be heeded when it comes to the priority of testing and which method to use .
About the author : Cassie Wilson is a freelance journalist and author with a 30-year background in health and medical reporting .
Her site is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in public relations and corporate communications at The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions as assistant director of public affairs .
Concurrently , she served as director of Health NewsFeed , a daily radio feature heard on more than 400 stations in the U.S. and Canada .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

COVID-19 IgM/IgG Rapid Test vs. RT-PCR: A Comparison Between Two Methods
Written by Cassie Wilson
Image Source
As the number of confirmed COVID-19 infections worldwide reached 5.6 million, with 2,430,603 recoveries and 352,225 deaths as of May 27, the World Health Organization continues to ask for immediate action in testing all individuals suspected with COVID-19.
WHO notes that the foundation of an effective pandemic response is the capacity to conduct mass-scale testing. The Director-General of the World Health Organization, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, said that all countries should prioritize testing for the virus. He also pointed out the pressing need to ramp up contact tracing efforts and isolation of infected individuals.
There are two primary types of testing methods currently in use today. The first test is called the IgM/IgG Rapid Test, while the second one is called the polymerase chain reaction test (RT-PCR). Below are several characteristics that set the two tests apart.
IgM/IgG Rapid Test Kits
The IgM/IgG Rapid Test Kit produces fast results. However, rather than identifying the genetic materials making up the novel coronavirus, the IgM/IgG Rapid Test detects the presence of antibodies in a person’s system.
So how exactly is this test used? First, licensed medical professionals must extract blood from a probable COVID-19 patient. Then, they load the sample to the test kit, along with three drops of sample diluent. After fifteen minutes, the kit will generate a result, and the licensed professional can interpret it.
Generally, the test kit reads for two different types of antibodies: the immunoglobulin G(IgG), which is the delayed immune response, and the immunoglobulin M (IgM), or the early immune response.
IgM antibodies are found in individuals who are SARS-COV-2 positive, while the IgG antibody is seen in patients who recovered from the infection. For instance, you might show no symptoms of the COVID-19 disease yet still test positive for IgG antibodies in your system. This might mean that you have been previously infected and generating immunity from the virus. In this case, you need to self-isolate.
However, if you are positive for both antibodies despite showing no symptoms, you must self-isolate for fourteen days before taking another IgM/IgG rapid test. If you test negative for IgG and positive for IgM without any symptoms, it means that you are infected. When this happens, it is best to take an RT-PCR test to confirm.
Moreover, if you test negative for both antibodies while showing no symptoms, your probability of infection is unlikely. To be safe and sure, consider taking another antibody test after seven days.
Although IgM/IgG rapid testing kits produce quick results, the test’s preciseness still depends on the sensitivity of the testing kit itself. Therefore, there is a high chance of errors in the results. False negatives and false positives are common with this type of testing kit.
Antibodies only progress a few weeks after the infection. For this reason, rapid coronavirus test kits may miss it in the earliest phases of the disease. A confirmatory RT-PCR test is needed to be performed on those who got a positive result in the rapid test.
RT-PCR Testing
The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) is a common technique that has been used for about thirty years in medicine and research to identify genetic information. A special and improved version of the PCR is the reverse-transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR).
The RT-PCR test was first used to detect ribonucleic acid (RNA) strands. Today, however, it is used to identify SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing the COVID-19 disease. Since RT-PCR directly tests for the presence of the virus, it became the leading test to detect infection.
RT-PCR tests are reliable and sensitive and can produce accurate results within three to four hours. However, it will take more hours if the samples are needed to be sent to an external laboratory.
You might be asking, ‘how does this type of testing method work?’ Well, first, licensed medical workers will collect samples from a suspected COVID-19 patient. Chemicals will be used to get rid of fats, proteins, and other molecules, thus, leaving RNA strands behind.
The strands will be a combination of a person’s genetic material and the viral RNA that may be present in the system. The RT-PCR copies the RNA to DNA and is increased in size to detect viruses through a PCR machine.
Moreover, fluorescent markers are usually used to secure the amplified DNA and supply light. If the light’s intensity within the sample hits a certain threshold, then it means the sample tested positive. Otherwise, the result is deemed negative.
It’s important to remember that RT-PCR testing won’t be able to identify if an individual had contracted the virus and recovered from it. It only detects an active infection present in a person’s system.
Takeaway
Not all COVID-19 test kits are alike, with each having its own set of advantages and disadvantages. Despite the different methods each one uses, these kits are still necessary to fight the spread of the virus. However, there’s currently a shortage of test kits available. Hence, a hierarchy must be heeded when it comes to the priority of testing and which method to use.
About the author: Cassie Wilson is a freelance journalist and author with a 30-year background in health and medical reporting. Her site is at www.cassieworks.com. Previously, Cassie worked in public relations and corporate communications at The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions as assistant director of public affairs. Concurrently, she served as director of Health NewsFeed, a daily radio feature heard on more than 400 stations in the U.S. and Canada.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-06-16--Another Renowned Scientist Questions The Safety of HPV Vaccines

Another Renowned Scientist Questions The Safety of HPV Vaccines A number of prominent doctors and scientists have shared their criticisms in peer-reviewed publications for quite some time .
These opinions are obviously not promoted at all , and anybody who makes such criticisms of the “ medical establishment ” is usually vilified .
In the past , it took a lot of bravery to say what you really felt if it was a perspective that ‘ went against the grain.
’ Today , it seems to be easier for health professionals to do so given the fact that so many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more are continuing to do it .
I ’ ve written about this before , using multiple examples .
Dr. Marcia Angell , physician and longtime Editor-in-Chief of the New England Medical Journal ( NEMJ ) , said that Arnold Seymour Relman ( 1923-2014 ) , a Harvard professor of medicine and also a former Editor-in-Chief of NEMJ , was frustrated that The list of papers that dive into the corruption and what seems to be the modern day politicization of science is long .
“ Even the pharmaceutical companies have been able @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the largest lobbying entity in Washington D.C..
They have more lobbyists in Washington D.C. than there are congressman and senators combined .
They give twice to congress what the next largest lobbying entity is , which is oil and gas… Imagine the power they exercise over both republicans and democrats .
They ’ ve captured them ( our regulatory agencies ) and turned them into sock puppets .
They ’ ve compromised the press… and they destroy the publications that publish real science.
” – Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ( source ) The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ same thing was published in 2016 by Dr. Mahin Khatami , who is a former program director at the National Cancer Institute ( NCI ) and National Institutes of Health ( NIH ) .
This particular paper of hers , titled “ Safety concerns and hidden agenda behind HPV vaccines : another generation of drug-dependent society , ” was published in Clinical and Translational Medicine .
( PMC5138175 ) In it , she makes many bold statements like : She states quite clearly in her introduction that the purpose of modern day healthcare @ @ @ @ @ @ @ follows : Is there any truth to what she is saying , or any corroborating research other than the sources she uses in her paper ?
Let ’ s take a look at her statement that “ too any vaccines with little/no ethical or safety considerations ” are being pushed on the population .
When it comes to the HPV vaccine , “ sixty-nine cancer centers urged HPV vaccination and thus-far , 80 million doses of HPV vaccines ( $ 200–260/ dose ) consumed by healthy public ” in the United States .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ math .
( source ) A new study published in The Royal Society of Medicine is one of multiple studies over the years that has emerged , questioning the efficacy of the HPV vaccine .
The researchers conducted an appraisal of published phase 2 and 3 efficacy trials in relation to the prevention of cervical cancer and their analysis showed “ the trials themselves generated significant uncertainties undermining claims of efficacy ” in the data they used .
The researchers point out that the trials used to test the vaccine may have “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
A study published in 2013 in Current Pharmaceutical Design carried out a review of HPV vaccine pre- and post-licensure trials to assess the evidence of their effectiveness and safety .
They found that , HPV vaccine clinical trials design , and data interpretation of both efficacy and safety outcomes , were largely inadequate .
Additionally , we note evidence of selective reporting of results from clinical trials ( i.e.
, exclusion of vaccine efficacy figures related to study subgroups in which efficacy might be lower or even negative from peer-reviewed publications ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ regarding HPV vaccines long-term benefits appears to rest on a number of unproven assumptions ( or such which are at odds with factual evidence ) and significant misinterpretation of available data .
For example , the claim that HPV vaccination will result in approximately 70 % reduction of cervical cancers is made despite the fact that the clinical trials data have not demonstrated to date that the vaccines have actually prevented a single case of cervical cancer ( let alone cervical cancer death ) , nor that the current overly optimistic surrogate marker-based @ @ @ @ @ @ @ notion that HPV vaccines have an impressive safety profile is only supported by highly flawed design of safety trials and is contrary to accumulating evidence from vaccine safety surveillance databases and case reports which continue to link HPV vaccination to serious adverse outcomes ( including death and permanent disabilities ) .
A Study published in Clinical Rheumatology entitled “ Serious adverse events after HPV vaccination : a critical review of randomized and post-marketing case series ” also brings up concerns : The list is quite long when it comes to the HPV vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her opinion .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Another Renowned Scientist Questions The Safety of HPV Vaccines
Written by Arjun Walia
A number of prominent doctors and scientists have shared their criticisms in peer-reviewed publications for quite some time. These opinions are obviously not promoted at all, and anybody who makes such criticisms of the “medical establishment” is usually vilified.
In the past, it took a lot of bravery to say what you really felt if it was a perspective that ‘went against the grain.’ Today, it seems to be easier for health professionals to do so given the fact that so many have done it in the past and more are continuing to do it.
I’ve written about this before, using multiple examples. Dr. Marcia Angell, physician and longtime Editor-in-Chief of the New England Medical Journal (NEMJ), said that
“it is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” (source)
Arnold Seymour Relman (1923-2014), a Harvard professor of medicine and also a former Editor-in-Chief of NEMJ, was frustrated that
“the medical profession is being bought by the pharmaceutical industry, not only in terms of the practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research. The academic institutions of this country are allowing themselves to be the paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I think it’s disgraceful.” (source)
The list of papers that dive into the corruption and what seems to be the modern day politicization of science is long.
“Even the pharmaceutical companies have been able to purchase congress. They’re the largest lobbying entity in Washington D.C.. They have more lobbyists in Washington D.C. than there are congressman and senators combined. They give twice to congress what the next largest lobbying entity is, which is oil and gas… Imagine the power they exercise over both republicans and democrats. They’ve captured them (our regulatory agencies) and turned them into sock puppets. They’ve compromised the press… and they destroy the publications that publish real science.” – Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (source)
The latest paper I came across expressing the same thing was published in 2016 by Dr. Mahin Khatami, who is a former program director at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and National Institutes of Health (NIH). This particular paper of hers, titled “Safety concerns and hidden agenda behind HPV vaccines: another generation of drug-dependent society,” was published in Clinical and Translational Medicine. (PMC5138175)
In it, she makes many bold statements like:
“The establishment is entitled to glamorize and publicize too many drugs or vaccines with little/no ethical or safety considerations for short, or long-term health hazards of such projects… Majority of vaccines that were designed to prevent diseases caused more death and diseases than public exposures to infective agents. Policy makers and the public should take a closer look at the long-lasting ‘medical/scientific ponzi schemes’ that the cancer establishment created to control a drug-dependent sick society.”
She states quite clearly in her introduction that the purpose of modern day healthcare, according to her, is as follows:
“Formation of a highly ordered and sophisticated medical hierarchy (establishment) in the nineteenth/twentieth century within higher education institutions (e.g., medical schools, organizations) was supported by businessmen and philanthropists with motives to profit from the sale of drugs.”
Is there any truth to what she is saying, or any corroborating research other than the sources she uses in her paper? Let’s take a look at her statement that “too any vaccines with little/no ethical or safety considerations” are being pushed on the population.
When it comes to the HPV vaccine, “sixty-nine cancer centers urged HPV vaccination and thus-far, 80 million doses of HPV vaccines ($200–260/ dose) consumed by healthy public” in the United States. I’ll let you do the math. (source)
A new study published in The Royal Society of Medicine is one of multiple studies over the years that has emerged, questioning the efficacy of the HPV vaccine. The researchers conducted an appraisal of published phase 2 and 3 efficacy trials in relation to the prevention of cervical cancer and their analysis showed “the trials themselves generated significant uncertainties undermining claims of efficacy” in the data they used.
The researchers emphasized that
“it is still uncertain whether human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination prevents cervical cancer as trials were not designed to detect this outcome, which takes decades to develop.”
The researchers point out that the trials used to test the vaccine may have “overestimated” the efficacy of the vaccine.
A study published in 2013 in Current Pharmaceutical Design carried out a review of HPV vaccine pre- and post-licensure trials to assess the evidence of their effectiveness and safety. They found that,
HPV vaccine clinical trials design, and data interpretation of both efficacy and safety outcomes, were largely inadequate. Additionally, we note evidence of selective reporting of results from clinical trials (i.e., exclusion of vaccine efficacy figures related to study subgroups in which efficacy might be lower or even negative from peer-reviewed publications). Given this, the widespread optimism regarding HPV vaccines long-term benefits appears to rest on a number of unproven assumptions (or such which are at odds with factual evidence) and significant misinterpretation of available data. For example, the claim that HPV vaccination will result in approximately 70{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} reduction of cervical cancers is made despite the fact that the clinical trials data have not demonstrated to date that the vaccines have actually prevented a single case of cervical cancer (let alone cervical cancer death), nor that the current overly optimistic surrogate marker-based extrapolations are justified. Likewise, the notion that HPV vaccines have an impressive safety profile is only supported by highly flawed design of safety trials and is contrary to accumulating evidence from vaccine safety surveillance databases and case reports which continue to link HPV vaccination to serious adverse outcomes (including death and permanent disabilities).
A Study published in Clinical Rheumatology entitled “Serious adverse events after HPV vaccination: a critical review of randomized and post-marketing case series” also brings up concerns:
HPV vaccine randomized trials were identified in PubMed. Safety data were extracted. Post-marketing case series describing HPV immunization adverse events were reviewed. Most HPV vaccine randomized trials did not use inert placebo in the control group. Two of the largest randomized trials found significantly more severe adverse events in the tested HPV vaccine arm of the study.Is The Aluminum In HPV Vaccines The Issue?
The list is quite long when it comes to the HPV vaccine, so Khatami is not incorrect in her opinion.
Read the full article at www.collective-evolution.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-06-16--Colorado Seeks ‘Re-Education’ For Parents Refusing COVID Vaccine

Are you ready for re-education camps in the United States ?
Colorado has introduced a bill that would “ re-educate ” parents who refuse to vaccinate their child with the coronavirus vaccine .
The bill forces all doctors and medical staff to give vaccinations with no exemptions , even if they are in a situation where they believe it would not be in that child ’ s best interest .
The bill ’ s current version , however , does not list any sanctions or punishments for medical staff that refuse , according to Life News .
The bill just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 20-14 ) to reduce available exemptions on vaccinations for school-age children ( making vaccines mandatory ) .
This bill offers “ online education modules ” for parents who want a different vaccination schedule than what the state demands .
Submitting a “ certificate of completion ” from the re-education classes is one way to receive the state-sanctioned vaccine exemption .
This plandemic was never about health , it was about forcing everyone to get a vaccine : an injection of whatever the hell the ruling class decided to put in the vaccine .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ health of anyone unless it ’ s for the health of Big Pharma and the ruling class .
What happens if the “ re-education ” fails to convince a person to get the vaccines ?
It ’ s hard to say , but these types of concentration camps ( and be honest with yourself , you know that ’ s what they are ) should be condemned by anyone who wishes to be free .
This is utterly insane .
The limits the governments are now going to in order to force people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , we knew this was coming .
We knew that the coronavirus was a scam to force everyone to take the COVID ( certification of vaccine ID ) under Agenda 2020 .
Beware , this could very well be what more religious people are calling “ the mark of the Beast ” , and people commenting on this Colorado bill have already made it clear that “ people won ’ t be able to go to work or school ” unless they get the vaccine .
This is the new normal they are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ why they need martial law .
Your chains are about to get much shorter unless you wake up and start to extract yourself from their system .
There isn ’ t much time left .
The government is not going to help you out , after all , they are the ones writing the laws while they have the police and military enforce them at gunpoint .
Wake up , or be enslaved .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office @ @ @ @ @ @ @ WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Colorado Seeks ‘Re-Education’ For Parents Refusing COVID Vaccine
Written by Mac Slavo
Are you ready for re-education camps in the United States? Colorado has introduced a bill that would “re-educate” parents who refuse to vaccinate their child with the coronavirus vaccine.
The bill forces all doctors and medical staff to give vaccinations with no exemptions, even if they are in a situation where they believe it would not be in that child’s best interest.
The bill’s current version, however, does not list any sanctions or punishments for medical staff that refuse, according to Life News.
The bill just passed through a committee in Colorado (20-14) to reduce available exemptions on vaccinations for school-age children (making vaccines mandatory). This bill offers “online education modules” for parents who want a different vaccination schedule than what the state demands. Submitting a “certificate of completion” from the re-education classes is one way to receive the state-sanctioned vaccine exemption.
This plandemic was never about health, it was about forcing everyone to get a vaccine: an injection of whatever the hell the ruling class decided to put in the vaccine. Vaccines are not being required for the health of anyone unless it’s for the health of Big Pharma and the ruling class.
What happens if the “re-education” fails to convince a person to get the vaccines? It’s hard to say, but these types of concentration camps (and be honest with yourself, you know that’s what they are) should be condemned by anyone who wishes to be free. This is utterly insane. The limits the governments are now going to in order to force people to get vaccinated is unbelievable.
But, we knew this was coming. We knew that the coronavirus was a scam to force everyone to take the COVID (certification of vaccine ID) under Agenda 2020. Beware, this could very well be what more religious people are calling “the mark of the Beast”, and people commenting on this Colorado bill have already made it clear that “people won’t be able to go to work or school” unless they get the vaccine.
This is the new normal they are conditioning us to accept. This is why they need martial law. Your chains are about to get much shorter unless you wake up and start to extract yourself from their system. There isn’t much time left. The government is not going to help you out, after all, they are the ones writing the laws while they have the police and military enforce them at gunpoint. Wake up, or be enslaved.
Read more at www.shtfplan.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-06-16--COVID: Britain Claims Dexamethasone as ‘first life-saving drug’

A cheap and widely available drug can help save the lives of patients seriously ill with coronavirus .
The low-dose steroid treatment dexamethasone is a major breakthrough in the fight against the deadly virus , UK experts say .
The drug is part of the world ’ s biggest trial testing existing treatments to see if they also work for coronavirus .
It cut the risk of death by a third for patients on ventilators .
For those on oxygen , it cut deaths by a fifth .
Had the drug had been used to treat patients in the UK @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up to 5,000 lives could have been saved , researchers say .
And it could be of huge benefit in poorer countries with high numbers of Covid-19 patients .
The UK government has 200,000 courses of the drug in its stockpile and says the NHS will make dexamethasone available to patients .
Prime Minister Boris Johnson there was a genuine case to celebrate “ a remarkable British scientific achievement ” , adding : “ We have taken steps to ensure we have enough supplies , even in the event of a second peak.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ with coronavirus recover without being admitted to hospital .
Of those who are admitted , most also recover but some may need oxygen or mechanical ventilation .
And these are the high-risk patients dexamethasone appears to help .
The drug is already used to reduce inflammation in a range of other conditions .
And it appears to help stop some of the damage that can happen when the body ’ s immune system goes into overdrive as it tries to fight off coronavirus .
This over-reaction , a cytokine storm , can be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by a team from Oxford University , about 2,000 hospital patients were given dexamethasone and compared with more than 4,000 who were not .
For patients on ventilators , it cut the risk of death from 40 % to 28 % .
For patients needing oxygen , it cut the risk of death from 25 % to 20 % .
Chief investigator Prof Peter Horby said : “ This is the only drug so far that has been shown to reduce mortality – and it reduces it significantly .
It ’ s a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Landray said the findings suggested one life could be saved for : • every eight patients on a ventilator “ There is a clear , clear benefit , ” he said .
“ The treatment is up to 10 days of dexamethasone and it costs about £5 per patient .
“ This is a drug that is globally available.
” When appropriate , hospital patients should now be given it without delay , Prof Landray said .
But people should not go out and buy it to take at home .
Dexamethasone does @ @ @ @ @ @ @ symptoms of coronavirus who do not need help with their breathing .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

COVID: Britain Claims Dexamethasone as ‘first life-saving drug’
Written by Michelle Roberts
A cheap and widely available drug can help save the lives of patients seriously ill with coronavirus.
The low-dose steroid treatment dexamethasone is a major breakthrough in the fight against the deadly virus, UK experts say. The drug is part of the world’s biggest trial testing existing treatments to see if they also work for coronavirus.
It cut the risk of death by a third for patients on ventilators. For those on oxygen, it cut deaths by a fifth.
Had the drug had been used to treat patients in the UK from the start of the pandemic, up to 5,000 lives could have been saved, researchers say.
And it could be of huge benefit in poorer countries with high numbers of Covid-19 patients.
The UK government has 200,000 courses of the drug in its stockpile and says the NHS will make dexamethasone available to patients.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson there was a genuine case to celebrate “a remarkable British scientific achievement”, adding: “We have taken steps to ensure we have enough supplies, even in the event of a second peak.”
About 19 out of 20 patients with coronavirus recover without being admitted to hospital.
Of those who are admitted, most also recover but some may need oxygen or mechanical ventilation.
And these are the high-risk patients dexamethasone appears to help.
The drug is already used to reduce inflammation in a range of other conditions.
And it appears to help stop some of the damage that can happen when the body’s immune system goes into overdrive as it tries to fight off coronavirus.
This over-reaction, a cytokine storm, can be deadly.
In the trial, led by a team from Oxford University, about 2,000 hospital patients were given dexamethasone and compared with more than 4,000 who were not.
For patients on ventilators, it cut the risk of death from 40{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} to 28{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}.
For patients needing oxygen, it cut the risk of death from 25{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} to 20{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}.
Chief investigator Prof Peter Horby said: “This is the only drug so far that has been shown to reduce mortality – and it reduces it significantly. It’s a major breakthrough.”
Lead researcher Prof Martin Landray said the findings suggested one life could be saved for:
every eight patients on a ventilator
every 20-25 treated with oxygen
“There is a clear, clear benefit,” he said.
“The treatment is up to 10 days of dexamethasone and it costs about £5 per patient.
“So essentially it costs £35 to save a life.
“This is a drug that is globally available.”
When appropriate, hospital patients should now be given it without delay, Prof Landray said. But people should not go out and buy it to take at home. Dexamethasone does not appear to help people with milder symptoms of coronavirus who do not need help with their breathing.
Read more at www.bbc.co.uk
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-06-16--FDA & AAPS in War Over Proven, Safe CV-19 Treatment

This weeks marks the beginning of an all-out legal war between the FDA and medical doctors over a successful treatment for COVID-19 .
A new FDA ’ s statement doubles down in opposing the Hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) treatment praised by President Trump .
While the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons ( AAPS ) , files a lawsuit against the FDA claiming bias and misinformation .
[ 1 ] A screenshot below of the AAPS lawsuit now filed in the federal court , Michigan : Since President Donald Trump rightly praised the safety and efficacy of a cheap and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Z-pac ) the FDA and media cronies have been all out to decry the remedy .
Among the dirty tricks is a deliberate failure to report and explain that Hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) ON ITS OWN is not the treatment widely endorsed by doctors and practitioners .
Indeed , the correct protocol is a combination of HCQ , zinc + Z-pac treatment .
As correctly reported in the Washington Post ( April 02 , 2o2o ) : Successes worldwide have seen hundreds of thousands , if not millions , successfully treated .
Indonesia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ populous nation , told doctors to use the drugs to treat all COVID-19 patients with symptoms from mild to severe .
The country has ramped up production of HCQ since March , granting two dozen licenses to local manufacturers , who have churned out millions of doses .
[ 3 ] While Veterans ’ Today ( March 31 , 2020 ) reported the correct protocol combinations as follows : But fighting back against this great news is the FDA .
It has now issued a statement intended to discredit further HCQ .
As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Use of Hydroxychloroquine : ‘ Unlikely to Be Effective ’ Against Coronavirus ’ ( June 15 , 2020 ) [ 5 ] : As with the climate fraud , this FDA claim relies on secret , unproven ‘ science ’ to smear independent scientists ( and doctors ) .
“ In its lawsuit ( http : //aapsonline.org/hcqsuit ) , filed in June in federal court in the Western District of Michigan , AAPS asks the court to enjoin the enforcement of the restrictions in the Mar 28 EUA ; to make available and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the public , HCQ from the SNS ; and to enjoin FDA , the Biomedical Advance Research & Development Authority ( BARDA ) , and HHS from impeding the distribution , sale , or purchase of HCQ by members of the public during the COVID-19 pandemic .
Through a biased , improper process , FDA officials from prior administrations acted contrary to the wishes of President Donald Trump by arbitrarily limiting use of HCQ .
Rick Bright , Ph.D. , former head of BARDA , who is an outspoken critic of President Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ widely available , distorted the agency process to unjustifiably limit access.
” It doesn ’ t just stop with the bias of Rick Bright , it goes far wider and deeper .
Readers are encourage to check out for themselves just how many members of the FDA board also have connections to Gilead .
See here : https : //defyccc.com/covid-1… [ 8 ] Why is this important ?
Because Gilead is the company pushing the ( now failing ) rival drug , Remdesivir .
Remdesivir would expensive – a huge money-maker for Big @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has also recommended that use of chloroquine ( CQ ) and HCQ for COVID-19 be suspended , and is also suspending their use in a global clinical trial called Solidarity .
[ 9 ] The goals of WHO and FDA members ( in cahoots with Big Pharma ) are the same : ( i ) to enrich themselves ; ( ii ) reduce the global population and ( iii ) to enslave us economically and intellectually .
Yet again , corrupted government agencies go public citing unpublished data from unpublished studies to hoodwink @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In response , the AAPS are learning from how climate skeptics defeated government secret science in the courts .
As with the Big Green rich corporations , elite billionaires , corrupt politicians and activists have all come together to share in common cause – to do down humanity .
Just like the man-made global warming scam , these crooks rely on a biased ( sold out ) media to hoodwink the scientifically-illiterate .
The average citizen gets duped by trickery , misrepresentation and strawman argumentation .
But my colleagues and I would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ science impacts larger society , we must retain our natural right to see all the evidence .
It is imperative that the FDA publishes the studies they rely on to dismiss the HCQ , zinc + Z-pac treatment .
It must be open to public scrutiny .
But , just as with the climate fraud , we know such ‘ studies ’ either don ’ t exist or , if they do , they are garbage , as we saw last week with the discredited Lancet study .
By contrast , the HCQ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ medicine used for 65 years already and on the World Health Organization ’ s list of the world ’ s safest medicines is very cheap my comparison .
We urge readers to open their eyes , look behind the glib media facades and understand that the leaders of major academic institutions , including medical schools , are a key element of the fraud .
As with university climatology departments , medical schools hike up overhead charges on every NIH or NSF research grant to fund their large staffs and build new campus buildings @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tenure to science and medical academics depends chiefly on how much money they bring in .
As with climate scientists , medical researchers are prone to human failings , too .
The real pandemic is the corruption within the science/ medical industrial complex .
Until we face up to it on a societal level we are all doomed .
[ 5 ] ‘ FDA Cancels Emergency Use of Hydroxychloroquine : ‘ Unlikely to Be Effective ’ Against Coronavirus ’ ( June 15 , 2020 ) About the author : John O ’ Sullivan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dr Tim Ball ) of Principia Scientific International ( PSI ) .
John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert , Michael ‘ hockey stick ’ Mann in the ‘ science trial of the century ‘ .
O ’ Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘ Slayers ’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world ’ s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

FDA & AAPS in War Over Proven, Safe CV-19 Treatment
Written by John O'Sullivan
This weeks marks the beginning of an all-out legal war between the FDA and medical doctors over a successful treatment for COVID-19.
A new FDA’s statement doubles down in opposing the Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) treatment praised by President Trump. While the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), files a lawsuit against the FDA claiming bias and misinformation. [1]
A screenshot below of the AAPS lawsuit now filed in the federal court, Michigan:
Since President Donald Trump rightly praised the safety and efficacy of a cheap and readily-available protocol (Hydroxychloroquine with zinc and Z-pac) the FDA and media cronies have been all out to decry the remedy.
As correctly reported in the Washington Post (April 02, 2o2o):
“An international poll of more than 6,000 doctors released Thursday found that the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine was the most highly rated treatment for the novel coronavirus. The survey conducted by Sermo, a global health care polling company, of 6,227 physicians in 30 countries found that 37{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of those treating COVID-19 patients rated hydroxychloroquine as the “most effective therapy” from a list of 15 options.” [2]
Worldwide there have been hundreds of thousands, if not millions, successfully treated. Indonesia, the world’s fourth most populous nation, told doctors to use the drugs to treat all COVID-19 patients with symptoms from mild to severe. The country has ramped up production of HCQ since March, granting two dozen licenses to local manufacturers, who have churned out millions of doses. [3]
Among the dirty tricks is a deliberate failure to report and explain that Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) ON ITS OWN is not the treatment widely endorsed by doctors and practitioners. Indeed, the correct protocol is a combination of HCQ, zinc + Z-pac treatment.
Veterans’ Today (March 31, 2020) reported the correct combination as follows:
“Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, a board-certified family practitioner in New York successfully treated 350 coronavirus patients with 100 percent success using a cocktail of drugs: hydroxychloroquine, in combination with azithromycin (Z-Pak), an antibiotic to treat secondary infections, and zinc sulfate.” [4]
But fighting back against this great news is the FDA. It has now issued a statement intended to discredit further HCQ. As Breitbart reports in ‘FDA Cancels Emergency Use of Hydroxychloroquine: ‘Unlikely to Be Effective’ Against Coronavirus’ (June 15, 2020) [5]:
“In a statement issued Monday, the FDA, a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), announced the anti-malaria drugs “are unlikely to be effective in treating COVID-19 for the authorized uses in the EUA,” [6] adding: Additionally, in light of ongoing serious cardiac adverse events and other potential serious side effects, the known and potential benefits of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine no longer outweigh the known and potential risks for the authorized use.”
As with the climate fraud, this FDA claim relies on secret, unproven ‘science’ to smear independent scientists (and doctors).
The AAPS states [7]:
“In its lawsuit (http://aapsonline.org/hcqsuit), filed in June in federal court in the Western District of Michigan, AAPS asks the court to enjoin the enforcement of the restrictions in the Mar 28 EUA; to make available and distribute promptly, for the benefit of the public, HCQ from the SNS; and to enjoin FDA, the Biomedical Advance Research & Development Authority (BARDA), and HHS from impeding the distribution, sale, or purchase of HCQ by members of the public during the COVID-19 pandemic. Through a biased, improper process, FDA officials from prior administrations acted contrary to the wishes of President Donald Trump by arbitrarily limiting use of HCQ. Rick Bright, Ph.D., former head of BARDA, who is an outspoken critic of President Trump and is personally opposed to making HCQ widely available, distorted the agency process to unjustifiably limit access.”
It doesn’t just stop with the bias of Rick Bright, it goes far wider and deeper. Readers may check for themselves just how many members of the FDA board also have connections to Gilead by viewing here: https://defyccc.com/covid-1… [8]
Why is this important? Because Gilead is the company pushing the (now failing) rival drug, Remdesivir. Remdesivir would expensive – a huge money-maker for Big Pharma.
Meanwhile, the UN WHO has also recommended that use of chloroquine (CQ) and HCQ for COVID-19 be suspended, and is also suspending their use in a global clinical trial called Solidarity. [9]
The goals of WHO and FDA members (in cahoots with Big Pharma) are the same: (i) to enrich themselves;(ii) reduce the global population and (iii) to enslave us economically and intellectually.
Yet again, corrupted government agencies go public citing secret data from unpublished studies to hoodwink the public and hide the scientific truths.
In response, the AAPS are learning from how climate skeptics defeated government secret science in the courts (by using common law rules of evidence to compel disclosure of all data). As with the Big Green rich corporations, elite billionaires, corrupt politicians and activists have all come together to share in common cause – to do down humanity.
The AAPS lawsuit continues:
“Harvey A. Risch, professor of epidemiology at the Yale School of Public Health and Yale School of Medicine, stated: “Hydroxychloroquine+azithromycin has been used as standard-of-care in more than 300,000 older adults with multicomorbidities, with estimated proportion diagnosed with cardiac arrhythmias attributable to the medications 47/100,000 users, of which estimated mortality is <20{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}, 9/100,000 users.” He noted that 10,000 Americans are dying each week from COVID-19. Five studies, he writes, including two controlled clinical trials, have demonstrated significant major outpatient treatment efficacy. He concluded that “these medications need to be widely available and promoted immediately for physicians” (Am J Epidemiol, May 27, 2020, https://tinyurl.com/y9yfb2h9).”
Just like the man-made global warming scam, these crooks rely on a biased (sold out) media to hoodwink the scientifically-illiterate. The average citizen gets duped by trickery, misrepresentation and strawman argumentation.
But my colleagues and I would argue, whenever government or big corporation science impacts larger society, we must retain our natural right to see all the evidence.
It is imperative that the FDA publishes the studies they rely on to dismiss the HCQ, zinc + Z-pac treatment. It must be open to public scrutiny.
But we fear, just as with the climate fraud, such ‘studies’ either don’t exist or, if they do, are the usual junk science garbage, as was witnesses last week with the discredited (now retracted) Lancet study. [10]
By contrast, the HCQ protocol relies on a long-standing, generic medicine used for 65 years already and on the World Health Organization’s list of the world’s safest medicines is very low cost by comparison.
We urge readers to open their eyes, look behind the glib media facades and understand that major academic institutions, including medical schools, are a key element of the fraud.
As with university climatology departments, medical schools hike up overhead charges on every NIH or NSF research grant to fund their large staffs and build new campus buildings. In modern academia it is common knowledge the granting of tenure to science and medical academics depends chiefly on how much money they bring in.
As with climate scientists, medical researchers are prone to human failings, too. The real pandemic is the corruption within the science/medical industrial complex. Until we face up to it on a societal level we are doomed to endure a medical and scientific dystopia.
[1] https://aapsonline.org/judicial/aaps-v-fda-hcq-6-2-2020.pdf
[2] https://public-cdn.sermo.com/covid19/c8/be4e/4edbd4/dbd4ba4ac5a3b3d9a479f99cc5/wave-i-sermo-covid-19-global-analysis-final.pdf
[3] https://tinyurl.com/yaq5edq2
[4] Veterans’ Today (March 31, 2020) https://www.veteranstoday.com/2020/03/31/dr-vladimir-zelinko-has-699-cv19-cures-with-hq-z-pak-zinc/
[5] ‘FDA Cancels Emergency Use of Hydroxychloroquine: ‘Unlikely to Be Effective’ Against Coronavirus’ (June 15, 2020)
[6] https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-revokes-emergency-use-authorization-chloroquine-and
[7] http://aapsonline.org/hcqsuit
[8] https://defyccc.com/covid-19-panel-gilead-ties/
[9] tinyurl.com/y935al4c
[10] https://principia-scientific.com/evidence-exposes-fraudulent-lancet-hcq-covid-19-study/
About the author: John O’Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI). John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-06-17--Another Hyped-up Hydroxychloroquine Study Exposed as Junk

Last week , The Lancet had to retract the most highly-touted hydroxychloroquine study to date , which was used as evidence for entire countries to change their stance on the drug .
The study , which was obviously flawed on its face , turned out to be produced by a shell company , with unverified data gathered by non-scientists .
But when that study flopped , another study was immediately latched onto .
It ’ s called the RECOVERY trials and was done in the UK .
Supposedly , this study was the counter to the fake study published by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ well yeah , that other study was bad , but this one got the same results.
” Well , not so much .
Edmund Fordham wrote a piece on what is an emerging controversy , in which it appears the lead of the RECOVERY trial took hydroxychloroquine for another drug , resulting in a high death rate .
Internet sleuths also got to work on the very heavy doses of the drug that were given – 2400 mg in the first 24 hours , as one critic had it .
Quizzed about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ twice , as being usual for other diseases such as amoebic dysentery .
Say again ?
Hydroxychloroquine is used for lupus and arthritis as well as malaria , but dysentery ?
As a footnote in medical history , the older chloroquine was used half a century ago in attempts to control dysentery , but Professor Christian Perronne , head of infectious diseases at Garches , France , told France Soir that it had been abandoned before 1976 .
Was Landray confusing hydroxychloroquine with the hydroxyquinolines , which are used for dysentery ?
1,132 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with general death rates nearly 10 % higher than other country ’ s hospitals ( the trial was randomized through Britain ’ s NHS ) .
Whether giving people 3x the usual dosage of most other studies played a part is now a very real question .
Landray defended himself twice , but is now claiming he ’ s being misquoted .
The French newspaper who quoted him denies that .
Landray explained there was no approved dosing for Covid because it was a new disease .
Well , yes , but the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the illness .
Asked whether the UK had a maximum dose for hydroxychloroquine , Landray wasn ’ t sure , but opined it would be much larger , say six to ten times the trial ’ s dose .
That makes 24 whole grams .
NICE says about 490 mg per day for a 75kg adult .
In France 1800 mg in a day mandates hospitalization as a poisoning .
Twenty-four grams at one go would be almost certainly lethal , possibly even to a gorilla .
So Landray has had notice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which will no doubt be explained in the full report , not yet released .
In the end , though , this study is just another in a long list which completely miss the mark and it ’ s good that it was canceled .
The effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine to fight coronavirus has always been in the early stages because of how the virus works .
Doing trials on extremely sick , hospitalized patients is scientifically counterproductive because the viral infection itself is no longer the issue at that point .
As the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ data , giving hydroxychloroquine without adjacent drugs ( anti-biotic and zinc ) is pointless and using that data in “ studies ” to claim the drug doesn ’ t work at all is incredibly misleading .
Why is that even being studied and included in any determination of its effectiveness ?
Countries and doctors that report success with hydroxychloroquine already know not to give it to late-stage patients and that it ’ s ineffective when used alone .
What they also know is that it does appear to have benefits for early-stage , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with other drugs .
Why is it so difficult for some to separate those things and focus on helping people ?
The whole thing feels politicized at this point .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Another Hyped-up Hydroxychloroquine Study Exposed as Junk
Written by 'Bonchie' via RedState.com
Last week, The Lancet had to retract the most highly-touted hydroxychloroquine study to date, which was used as evidence for entire countries to change their stance on the drug.
The study, which was obviously flawed on its face, turned out to be produced by a shell company, with unverified data gathered by non-scientists.
But when that study flopped, another study was immediately latched onto. It’s called the RECOVERY trials and was done in the UK. Supposedly, this study was the counter to the fake study published by Lancet.
It was the proof that “well yeah, that other study was bad, but this one got the same results.”
Well, not so much.
Edmund Fordham wrote a piece on what is an emerging controversy, in which it appears the lead of the RECOVERY trial took hydroxychloroquine for another drug, resulting in a high death rate.
Internet sleuths also got to work on the very heavy doses of the drug that were given – 2400 mg in the first 24 hours, a ‘dose fit for a gorilla’ as one critic had it. Quizzed about this, Landray defended the dosage, twice, as being usual for other diseases such as amoebic dysentery. Say again? Hydroxychloroquine is used for lupus and arthritis as well as malaria, but dysentery? As a footnote in medical history, the older chloroquine was used half a century ago in attempts to control dysentery, but Professor Christian Perronne, head of infectious diseases at Garches, France, told France Soir that it had been abandoned before 1976. Was Landray confusing hydroxychloroquine with the hydroxyquinolines, which are used for dysentery?
1,132 patients died in the RECOVERY trial, with general death rates nearly 10{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} higher than other country’s hospitals (the trial was randomized through Britain’s NHS). Whether giving people 3x the usual dosage of most other studies played a part is now a very real question.
Landray defended himself twice, but is now claiming he’s being misquoted. The French newspaper who quoted him denies that.
Landray explained there was no approved dosing for Covid because it was a new disease. Well, yes, but the toxic dose won’t change depending on the illness. Asked whether the UK had a maximum dose for hydroxychloroquine, Landray wasn’t sure, but opined it would be much larger, say six to ten times the trial’s dose. That makes 24 whole grams. NICE says about 490 mg per day for a 75kg adult. In France 1800 mg in a day mandates hospitalization as a poisoning. Twenty-four grams at one go would be almost certainly lethal, possibly even to a gorilla. So Landray has had notice of some hard questions on dose, which will no doubt be explained in the full report, not yet released.
In the end, though, this study is just another in a long list which completely miss the mark and it’s good that it was canceled. The effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine to fight coronavirus has always been in the early stages because of how the virus works. Doing trials on extremely sick, hospitalized patients is scientifically counterproductive because the viral infection itself is no longer the issue at that point.
As the now-debunked Lancet published study counted in their data, giving hydroxychloroquine without adjacent drugs (anti-biotic and zinc) is pointless and using that data in “studies” to claim the drug doesn’t work at all is incredibly misleading. Why is that even being studied and included in any determination of its effectiveness?
Countries and doctors that report success with hydroxychloroquine already know not to give it to late-stage patients and that it’s ineffective when used alone. What they also know is that it does appear to have benefits for early-stage, non-hospitalized subjects when prescribed properly in conjunction with other drugs. Why is it so difficult for some to separate those things and focus on helping people?
The whole thing feels politicized at this point.
Read more at www.redstate.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-06-17--What Michael Crichton Taught Us About Science Fraud

What Michael Crichton Taught Us About Science Fraud Michael Crichton ’ s books earned global plaudits .
He invented the genre we now call the techno thriller whereby it is hard to discern whether it is fact or fiction you were reading .
The reason for that was because he wove his plots around well researched facts .
One of the best examples is State of Fear .
If you are a student of the climate change furor it is a must read chock full of intelligent insight into the twisted pseudo science driving the environmental movement .
Below is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deftly summarizes the reality of nature and man through the character , Kenner .
( emphasis added ) Let ’ s remember where we live , Kenner was saying .
We live on the third planet from a medium sized sun .
Our planet is five billion years old , and it has been changing constantly all during that time .
The Earth is now on its third atmosphere .
The first atmosphere was helium and hydrogen .
It dissipated early on because the planet was so hot .
Then as the planet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ atmosphere of steam and carbon dioxide .
Later the water vapor condensed , forming the oceans that cover most of the planet .
Then , around three billion years ago , some bacteria evolved to consume carbon dioxide and excrete a highly toxic gas , oxygen .
Other bacteria released nitrogen , The atmospheric concentration of these gases slowly increased .
Organisms that could not adapt died out .
Meanwhile , the planet ’ s land masses , floating on huge tectonic plates , eventually came together in a configuration that interfered with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ began to get cold for the first time .
The first ice appeared two billion years ago .
And for the last seven hundred thousand years the planet has been in a geological ice age , characterized by advancing and retreating glacial ice .
No one is entirely sure why , but ice now covers the planet every hundred thousand years , with smaller advances every twenty thousand or so .
The last advance was twenty thousand years ago , so we ’ re due for the next one .
And even today @ @ @ @ @ @ @ planet remains amazingly active .
We have five hundred volcanoes , and an eruption every two weeks .
Earthquakes are continuous : a million and a half a year , a moderate Richter 5 quake every six hours , a big earthquake every ten days .
Tsunamis race across the Pacific Ocean every three months .
Our atmosphere is as violent as the land beneath it .
At any moment there are one thousand five hundred electrical storms across the planet .
Eleven lighting bolts strike the earth every second .
A tornado @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
And every four days a giant cyclonic storm , hundreds of miles in diameter , spins over the ocean and wreaks havoc on the land .
The nasty little apes that call themselves human beings can do nothing except run and hide .
For these same apes to imagine they can stabilize this atmosphere is arrogant beyond belief .
They can ’ t control the climate .
The reality is , they run from the storms .
What may we interpret from this ?
The world is not going to end and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cold , not heat , is to be feared .
Life has survived both extremes of climates .
What are termed as extreme weather events have always existed .
The graph above demonstrates we are getting better every day in understanding our environment , working with it and adapting to its harsher realities .
State of Fear is still in print and is an important guide for future decisions in life .
Another gem from this insightful writer I found apropos to the above .
It ought to make us all think about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ lockdown.
’ From Crichton ’ s 2006 novel , ‘ Next.
‘ The Price We Pay for Scientific Fraud Fraud in science is not rare and not limited to fringe players .
The most respected researchers and institutions have been caught with faked data .
So , keep in mind this brilliant author ’ s warning : “ The ultimate lesson is that science isn ’ t special—at least not anymore .
Maybe back when Einstein talked to Niels Bohr , and there were only a few dozen important workers in every @ @ @ @ @ @ @ million researchers in America .
It ’ s no longer a calling , It ’ s a career .
Science is as corruptible a human activity as any other .
Its practitioners aren ’ t saints , they ’ re human beings , and they do what human beings do—lie , cheat , steal from one another , sue , hide date , fake data , overstate their own importance , and denigrate opposing views unfairly .
That ’ s human nature .
It isn ’ t going to change.
” PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

What Michael Crichton Taught Us About Science Fraud
Written by Alan Stewart
Michael Crichton’s books earned global plaudits. He invented the genre we now call the techno thriller whereby it is hard to discern whether it is fact or fiction you were reading. The reason for that was because he wove his plots around well researched facts.
One of the best examples is State of Fear. If you are a student of the climate change furor it is a must read chock full of intelligent insight into the twisted pseudo science driving the environmental movement.
Below is a key short extract in which Crichton deftly summarizes the reality of nature and man through the character, Kenner. (emphasis added)
Let’s remember where we live, Kenner was saying. We live on the third planet from a medium sized sun. Our planet is five billion years old, and it has been changing constantly all during that time. The Earth is now on its third atmosphere. The first atmosphere was helium and hydrogen. It dissipated early on because the planet was so hot. Then as the planet cooled, volcanic eruptions produced a second atmosphere of steam and carbon dioxide. Later the water vapor condensed, forming the oceans that cover most of the planet. Then, around three billion years ago, some bacteria evolved to consume carbon dioxide and excrete a highly toxic gas, oxygen. Other bacteria released nitrogen, The atmospheric concentration of these gases slowly increased. Organisms that could not adapt died out. Meanwhile, the planet’s land masses, floating on huge tectonic plates, eventually came together in a configuration that interfered with the circulation of ocean currents. It began to get cold for the first time. The first ice appeared two billion years ago. And for the last seven hundred thousand years the planet has been in a geological ice age, characterized by advancing and retreating glacial ice. No one is entirely sure why, but ice now covers the planet every hundred thousand years, with smaller advances every twenty thousand or so. The last advance was twenty thousand years ago, so we’re due for the next one. And even today, after five billion years, our planet remains amazingly active. We have five hundred volcanoes, and an eruption every two weeks. Earthquakes are continuous: a million and a half a year, a moderate Richter 5 quake every six hours, a big earthquake every ten days. Tsunamis race across the Pacific Ocean every three months. Our atmosphere is as violent as the land beneath it. At any moment there are one thousand five hundred electrical storms across the planet. Eleven lighting bolts strike the earth every second. A tornado tears across the surface every six hours. And every four days a giant cyclonic storm, hundreds of miles in diameter, spins over the ocean and wreaks havoc on the land. The nasty little apes that call themselves human beings can do nothing except run and hide. For these same apes to imagine they can stabilize this atmosphere is arrogant beyond belief. They can’t control the climate. The reality is, they run from the storms.
What may we interpret from this?
The world is not going to end and neither is civilization going to end. Cold, not heat, is to be feared. Life has survived both extremes of climates. What are termed as extreme weather events have always existed.
The graph above demonstrates we are getting better every day in understanding our environment, working with it and adapting to its harsher realities.
State of Fear is still in print and is an important guide for future decisions in life.
A Postscript
Another gem from this insightful writer I found apropos to the above. It ought to make us all think about the debacle that has been the pandemic ‘lockdown.’ From Crichton’s 2006 novel, ‘Next.‘
The Price We Pay for Scientific Fraud
“The cost of such fraud is enormous,” McKeown said, “estimated at thirty billion dollars annually, probably three times that.”
Fraud in science is not rare and not limited to fringe players. The most respected researchers and institutions have been caught with faked data. So, keep in mind this brilliant author’s warning:
“The ultimate lesson is that science isn’t special—at least not anymore. Maybe back when Einstein talked to Niels Bohr, and there were only a few dozen important workers in every field. But there are now three million researchers in America. It’s no longer a calling, It’s a career. Science is as corruptible a human activity as any other. Its practitioners aren’t saints, they’re human beings, and they do what human beings do—lie, cheat, steal from one another, sue, hide date, fake data, overstate their own importance, and denigrate opposing views unfairly. That’s human nature. It isn’t going to change.” *****
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-06-19--The International Energy Agency Now Joins Sick Climate Conspiracy

The International Energy Agency has joined the conspiracy outlining a $ 3 trillion plan to restart the global economy while cutting greenhouse gas emissions , saying that governments have a “ once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ” to create jobs while decarbonizing infrastructure .
Their highly questionable economist Fatih Birol ( photo , above ) has suddenly come out and proclaimed that the world has six months to avert a climate crisis .
He has warned of the need to prevent post-lockdown surge in emissions .
This is complete nonsense for this elitist consortium has already shut down the world economy to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not produced and electricity by coal in two months .
He spouts out statements with NO SUPPORTING scientific evidence and is pretending the world will end in 6 months if we allow people to use energy again .
You can Google Faith Birol and he is an economist with no background in climate .
For decades his forecasts have been all about the rise and fall of energy – not climate change .
It is made up of 30 member countries , 8 association countries , and 2 accession countries all of which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ You will find that the IEA accepts also private donations and Birol is also now linked to Gates .
The IEA is an autonomous intergovernmental organization within the OECD framework , headed by its Executive Director .
The strange part is that its Governing Board is the main decision-making body and it is composed of energy ministers or their senior representatives from each member country .
For the IEA ’ s chief economist to come out of the blue with climate change forecasts are against the self-interests of member states that produce energy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the OECD .
Countries and other energy stakeholders make “ voluntary contributions ” to support IEA programs .
About a third of the IEA ’ s spending is financed by “ voluntary contributions ” , most of which are from government sources .
Besides health , Gates has been also involved in buying into energy companies .
He has put together a consortium of investors into Breakthrough Energy .
While this operation has been funding thermal energy development in Japan , they are pushing for the elimination of fossil fuels in Europe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many other secretive energy operations all of which will benefit by shutting down fossil fuels .
He and his consortium have major stakes in alternative energy and stand to financially gain massively by keeping the world economy closed and the people locked in their houses .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

The International Energy Agency Now Joins Sick Climate Conspiracy
Written by Martin Armstrong
The International Energy Agency has joined the conspiracy outlining a $3 trillion plan to restart the global economy while cutting greenhouse gas emissions, saying that governments have a “once-in-a-lifetime opportunity” to create jobs while decarbonizing infrastructure.
Their highly questionable economist Fatih Birol (photo, above) has suddenly come out and proclaimed that the world has six months to avert a climate crisis. He has warned of the need to prevent post-lockdown surge in emissions.
This is complete nonsense for this elitist consortium has already shut down the world economy to the point that in Britain, they have not produced and electricity by coal in two months. He spouts out statements with NO SUPPORTING scientific evidence and is pretending the world will end in 6 months if we allow people to use energy again.
You can Google Faith Birol and he is an economist with no background in climate. For decades his forecasts have been all about the rise and fall of energy – not climate change. It is made up of 30 member countries, 8 association countries, and 2 accession countries all of which must be a member of OECD. You will find that the IEA accepts also private donations and Birol is also now linked to Gates.
The IEA is an autonomous intergovernmental organization within the OECD framework, headed by its Executive Director. The strange part is that its Governing Board is the main decision-making body and it is composed of energy ministers or their senior representatives from each member country. For the IEA’s chief economist to come out of the blue with climate change forecasts are against the self-interests of member states that produce energy
The IEA operates under the financial framework of the OECD. Countries and other energy stakeholders make “voluntary contributions” to support IEA programs. About a third of the IEA’s spending is financed by “voluntary contributions”, most of which are from government sources.
Besides health, Gates has been also involved in buying into energy companies. He has put together a consortium of investors into Breakthrough Energy. While this operation has been funding thermal energy development in Japan, they are pushing for the elimination of fossil fuels in Europe as well.
He has been funding many other secretive energy operations all of which will benefit by shutting down fossil fuels. He and his consortium have major stakes in alternative energy and stand to financially gain massively by keeping the world economy closed and the people locked in their houses.
Read more at www.armstrongeconomics.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related