principiascientificinternational--2020-08-12--Top State Official Caught Using Faked Data to Push Mask Mandate

Top State Official Caught Using Faked Data to Push Mask Mandate A top Kansas official is facing criticism after he was caught using a “ doctored ” chart to justify face mask mandates .
Kansas Department of Health and Environment Secretary Lee Norman presented a coronavirus case chart to the media last week to contrast Kansas counties abiding by Democratic Gov .
Laura Kelly ’ s mask mandate and those that have not , The Sentinel reported .
Norman claimed that counties abiding by the mandate are “ winning the battle , ” suggesting that counties that have not followed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the improvement in the case development comes from those counties wearing masks , ” Norman said , The Sentinel reported .
However , Norman ’ s claim only appeared true because he manipulated his chart to create the illusion that counties following the mask mandate are successfully warding off coronavirus .
Norman used an axis with a range of 15 to 25 to describe the number of new cases in masked counties and used a range of 4 to 14 to describe the number of new cases in counties without a mask @ @ @ @ @ @ @ counties without a mask mandate had more cases .
When the two sets of data are placed on a chart with the same axis , counties without a mask mandate have fewer new cases per day than counties with a mask mandate .
As of last week , the vast majority of Kansas counties — 90 of the state ’ s 105 — rejected the governor ’ s face covering mandate because so few people in the state have contracted the virus .
Overall , fewer than 1 % of Kansans have tested @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now speaking out about the lack of transparency from the governor ’ s administration .
“ Governor Kelly and her administration have failed Kansans time and again , but manipulating data to intentionally deceive the entire state is a new low , ” Kansas House Majority Leader Dan Hawkins , a Republican , said , The Sentinel reported .
“ Tens-of-thousands of Kansans have lost their jobs and businesses as a direct result of Governor Kelly ’ s politics-first response to the COVID pandemic , and these individuals struggling to make ends meet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is reprehensible for a public servant like Dr. Norman that we trusted to protect our health and safety in a nonpartisan way to intentionally spread misinformation , ” he continued .
“ The Kelly administration has lost all credibility.
” PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Top State Official Caught Using Faked Data to Push Mask Mandate
Written by Chris Enloe
A top Kansas official is facing criticism after he was caught using a “doctored” chart to justify face mask mandates.
Kansas Department of Health and Environment Secretary Lee Norman presented a coronavirus case chart to the media last week to contrast Kansas counties abiding by Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly’s mask mandate and those that have not, The Sentinel reported.
Norman claimed that counties abiding by the mandate are “winning the battle,” suggesting that counties that have not followed the mandate are losing.
“All of the improvement in the case development comes from those counties wearing masks,” Norman said, The Sentinel reported.
However, Norman’s claim only appeared true because he manipulated his chart to create the illusion that counties following the mask mandate are successfully warding off coronavirus.
From the Washington Examiner:
Norman used an axis with a range of 15 to 25 to describe the number of new cases in masked counties and used a range of 4 to 14 to describe the number of new cases in counties without a mask mandate, making it appear as though counties without a mask mandate had more cases. When the two sets of data are placed on a chart with the same axis, counties without a mask mandate have fewer new cases per day than counties with a mask mandate.
As of last week, the vast majority of Kansas counties — 90 of the state’s 105 — rejected the governor’s face covering mandate because so few people in the state have contracted the virus.
Overall, fewer than 1% of Kansans have tested positive for COVID-19.
Kansas Republicans are now speaking out about the lack of transparency from the governor’s administration.
“Governor Kelly and her administration have failed Kansans time and again, but manipulating data to intentionally deceive the entire state is a new low,” Kansas House Majority Leader Dan Hawkins, a Republican, said, The Sentinel reported. “Tens-of-thousands of Kansans have lost their jobs and businesses as a direct result of Governor Kelly’s politics-first response to the COVID pandemic, and these individuals struggling to make ends meet deserve to know the truth. It is reprehensible for a public servant like Dr. Norman that we trusted to protect our health and safety in a nonpartisan way to intentionally spread misinformation,” he continued. “The Kelly administration has lost all credibility.”
Read more at www.theblaze.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-12--A super fast acid cloud detected on Venus

Lurking just below the atmosphere of is a wall of acid clouds that whip around the planet at speeds close to that of a commercial air jet on Earth .
The newly discovered atmospheric “ feature ” looms about 31 miles ( 50 kilometers ) below the thick cloud tops of Venus and is extensive , sometimes stretching as far as 4,660 miles ( 7,500 km ) across the equator and mid-latitudes of Venus .
And it ’ s been there for at least three decades .
It may seem odd that such a huge feature went undiscovered for so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and high-resolution telescopes have been gazing at the planet for years before that .
And the first hint that something strange was happening came from the that has been orbiting Venus since 2015 .
It took a new survey of archival footage , however , to determine the cloud wall has been there since at least 1983 .
“ We needed access to a large , growing and scattered collection of images of Venus gathered in recent decades with different telescopes , ” study co-author Pedro Machado , a researcher with Portugal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sciences , .
The archival footage came from observatories including the Galileo National Telescope in the Canary Islands and the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility in Hawaii .
Enormous cloud patterns in the upper atmosphere are already well-known at Venus , including a bizarre “ Y ” shape that may arise from centrifugal forces , and a bow wave that could arise from air flow over static ground features like mountains .
The newly discovered cloud wall , however , is at a lower altitude and in a region of Venus ’ atmosphere where @ @ @ @ @ @ @ keeping the surface at lead-melting temperatures of 870 degrees Fahrenheit ( 465 degrees Celsius ) .
Researchers suggest the cloud wall could be linked to the .
The newly found feature could potentially dump enough momentum and energy to fuel the fast winds further up , lead author Javier Peralta , an astrophysicist at the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency ( JAXA , which runs the Akatsuki mission ) , said in the same statement .
That ’ s because the cloud wall zooms above the surface at jet-like speeds of 203 miles ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ causes the cloud wall is still unknown and will require further research , the team said .
However , the researchers added , the feature could be an atmospheric “ Kelvin ” wave , a class of atmospheric gravity waves that has already been observed at Venus .
Gravity waves in a planet ’ s atmosphere ( not to be confused with gravitational waves ) happen when winds move at high speed over static geological features like a crater wall or a mountain ; the updraft rises and sinks in a layer of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ A study based on the research was published on May 27 in the journal .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

A super fast acid cloud detected on Venus
Written by Elizabeth Howell
Lurking just below the atmosphere of Venus is a wall of acid clouds that whip around the planet at speeds close to that of a commercial air jet on Earth.
The newly discovered atmospheric “feature” looms about 31 miles (50 kilometers) below the thick cloud tops of Venus and is extensive, sometimes stretching as far as 4,660 miles (7,500 km) across the equator and mid-latitudes of Venus. And it’s been there for at least three decades.
It may seem odd that such a huge feature went undiscovered for so long, given that spacecraft have visited Venus sporadically since 1962, and high-resolution telescopes have been gazing at the planet for years before that. And the first hint that something strange was happening came from the Japanese Akatsuki spacecraft that has been orbiting Venus since 2015.
It took a new survey of archival footage, however, to determine the cloud wall has been there since at least 1983. “We needed access to a large, growing and scattered collection of images of Venus gathered in recent decades with different telescopes,” study co-author Pedro Machado, a researcher with Portugal’s Institute of Astrophysics and Space Sciences, said in a statement .
The archival footage came from observatories including the Galileo National Telescope in the Canary Islands and the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility in Hawaii.
Enormous cloud patterns in the upper atmosphere are already well-known at Venus, including a bizarre “Y” shape that may arise from centrifugal forces , and a bow wave that could arise from air flow over static ground features like mountains . The newly discovered cloud wall, however, is at a lower altitude and in a region of Venus’ atmosphere where the greenhouse effect is quite pronounced, keeping the surface at lead-melting temperatures of 870 degrees Fahrenheit (465 degrees Celsius).
Researchers suggest the cloud wall could be linked to the mysterious and long-observed fast rotation in Venus’ upper atmosphere . The newly found feature could potentially dump enough momentum and energy to fuel the fast winds further up, lead author Javier Peralta, an astrophysicist at the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA, which runs the Akatsuki mission), said in the same statement. That’s because the cloud wall zooms above the surface at jet-like speeds of 203 miles (328 km) an hour.
What causes the cloud wall is still unknown and will require further research, the team said. However, the researchers added, the feature could be an atmospheric “Kelvin” wave, a class of atmospheric gravity waves that has already been observed at Venus . Gravity waves in a planet’s atmosphere (not to be confused with gravitational waves) happen when winds move at high speed over static geological features like a crater wall or a mountain; the updraft rises and sinks in a layer of stable air just above the feature.
A study based on the research was published on May 27 in the journal Geophysical Research Letters .
Read more at www.space.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-12--Are Underground Oceans Making Ceres So Salty?

Data from NASA ’ s now-defunct Dawn spacecraft orbiting Ceres has shown that the largest object in the Solar System ’ s asteroid belt has sub-surface oceans and recent volcanic activity , according to a group of papers published in Nature journals .
In the first study led by NASA JPL ’ s Carol Raymond , the geological scientists based their findings on data collected by the Dawn space probe , which orbited Ceres from 2015 to 2018 before it ran out of fuel .
Though Ceres is huge in asteroid terms , it has 1.3 per cent of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a radius of just 296 miles ( 476km ) .
Four years ago , NASA revealed an icy volcanic dome on the surface of the body , evidence of cryovolcanic activity .
Now the agency ’ s Raymond and colleagues have revealed the fruit of their labours studying the Occator crater , a 20-million-year-old feature that exhibits bright deposits , in the paper “ Impact-driven mobilization of deep crustal brines on dwarf planet Ceres ” .
In the last phase of the Dawn mission between June and October 2018 , the probe descended @ @ @ @ @ @ @ imaging , infrared spectroscopy , elemental spectroscopy and gravity science .
The study focused on the bright salt deposits on the planet ’ s surface , which puzzled scientists .
Were they a result of the eruption of brine from deep under the surface and remnants of an ancient ocean , or from a shallow impact melt chamber ?
The planetary scientists looked at high-resolution images of the Dawn Framing Camera that suggested a recent period of cryovolcanic activity , which began around nine million years ago and lasted for several million years @ @ @ @ @ @ @ liquid was reaching the surface millions of years after the crater formed .
“ These findings are indicative of a deep-seated brine source , ” the authors said .
Salty water still seems to be coming to the surface .
In a separate paper , “ Fresh emplacement of hydrated sodium chloride on Ceres from ascending salty fluids ” , also in Nature Astronomy , Maria Cristina De Sanctis , of Rome ’ s Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica and colleagues reported the presence of hydrated chloride salts at the centre of Cerealia Facula @ @ @ @ @ @ @ middle of the crater .
As these salts lose water quickly , the authors suggest they are evidence that brine still exists in the interior of the Ceres .
The discovery of subsurface water on Ceres adds to recent Dawn-related discoveries .
In 2018 , a research letter published in Geophysical Research Letters showed there is a higher concentration of carbon-based compounds on its surface than previously estimated .
While fellow dwarf planet Pluto is 14 times bigger and millions of kilometres away , the latest work looking at Ceres suggests they have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pluto , too , may have supported subsurface oceans early in its development .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Are Underground Oceans Making Ceres So Salty?
Written by Lindsay Clark
Data from NASA’s now-defunct Dawn spacecraft orbiting Ceres has shown that the largest object in the Solar System’s asteroid belt has sub-surface oceans and recent volcanic activity, according to a group of papers published in Nature journals.
In the first study led by NASA JPL’s Carol Raymond, the geological scientists based their findings on data collected by the Dawn space probe, which orbited Ceres from 2015 to 2018 before it ran out of fuel.
Though Ceres is huge in asteroid terms, it has 1.3 per cent of the mass of Earth’s moon and a radius of just 296 miles (476km).
Four years ago, NASA revealed an icy volcanic dome on the surface of the body, evidence of cryovolcanic activity.
Now the agency’s Raymond and colleagues have revealed the fruit of their labours studying the Occator crater, a 20-million-year-old feature that exhibits bright deposits, in the paper “Impact-driven mobilization of deep crustal brines on dwarf planet Ceres”.
In the last phase of the Dawn mission between June and October 2018, the probe descended to 35km above the surface and performed imaging, infrared spectroscopy, elemental spectroscopy and gravity science.
The study focused on the bright salt deposits on the planet’s surface, which puzzled scientists. Were they a result of the eruption of brine from deep under the surface and remnants of an ancient ocean, or from a shallow impact melt chamber?
The planetary scientists looked at high-resolution images of the Dawn Framing Camera that suggested a recent period of cryovolcanic activity, which began around nine million years ago and lasted for several million years. They also discovered several events suggesting liquid was reaching the surface millions of years after the crater formed.
“These findings are indicative of a deep-seated brine source,” the authors said.
Salty water still seems to be coming to the surface. In a separate paper, “Fresh emplacement of hydrated sodium chloride on Ceres from ascending salty fluids”, also in Nature Astronomy, Maria Cristina De Sanctis, of Rome’s Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica and colleagues reported the presence of hydrated chloride salts at the centre of Cerealia Facula, the largest bright spot in the middle of the crater.
As these salts lose water quickly, the authors suggest they are evidence that brine still exists in the interior of the Ceres.
The discovery of subsurface water on Ceres adds to recent Dawn-related discoveries. In 2018, a research letter published in Geophysical Research Letters showed there is a higher concentration of carbon-based compounds on its surface than previously estimated.
While fellow dwarf planet Pluto is 14 times bigger and millions of kilometres away, the latest work looking at Ceres suggests they have more in common than once thought. Pluto, too, may have supported subsurface oceans early in its development.
Read more at www.theregister.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-12--The COVID cart is in front of the horse

The COVID cart is in front of the horse

The COVID cart is in front of the horse Before investing reputations , company , investment capital and time developing diagnostic tests and vaccines , not to mention re-structuring societies and the world economy , one would think that business people and scientists would want to know the CAUSE of this pandemic .
So far , the standard methods of virology ( which have been used for many decades to prove the CAUSE of an infectious disease ) have not been fulfilled for SARS CoV-2 ( aka COVID-19 aka the China or Wuhan virus . )
At least my literature @ @ @ @ @ @ @ One standard protocol has 4 steps , the second has 6 steps .
Most of those steps have not been fulfilled .
So far , SARS CoV-2 is associated /correlated with this disease and pandemic .
CoV-2 could easily be a follow-on infection after the immune system is wrecked by pneumonia , cancer , chemotherapy , and many other chronic diseases .
About the author : Bud Bromley is a retired life sciences executive .
Bud ’ s entrepreneurial leadership exceeded three decades .
He was the senior business development , marketing and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ each company a supplier of analytical and life sciences instrumentation , software , consumables and service .
Prior to those positions , his 19 year career in Hewlett-Packard Company ’ s Analytical Products Group included worldwide sales and marketing responsibility for Bioscience Products , Global Accounts and the International Olympic Committee .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific @ @

The COVID cart is in front of the horse
Written by Bud Bromley
Before investing reputations, company, investment capital and time developing diagnostic tests and vaccines, not to mention re-structuring societies and the world economy, one would think that business people and scientists would want to know the CAUSE of this pandemic.
So far, the standard methods of virology (which have been used for many decades to prove the CAUSE of an infectious disease) have not been fulfilled for SARS CoV-2 (aka COVID-19 aka the China or Wuhan virus.) At least my literature search has not found that report. One standard protocol has 4 steps, the second has 6 steps. Most of those steps have not been fulfilled.
So far, SARS CoV-2 is associated /correlated with this disease and pandemic. CoV-2 could easily be a follow-on infection after the immune system is wrecked by pneumonia, cancer, chemotherapy, and many other chronic diseases.
More here: https://budbromley.blog/2020/08/05/is-cov-2-confirmed-as-the-cause-of-this-pandemic/
#sarscov2#pandemic#coranavirus#covid #business #investment #healthcare #economy #research
Read more at budbromley.blog
About the author: Bud Bromley is a retired life sciences executive. Bud’s entrepreneurial leadership exceeded three decades. He was the senior business development, marketing and sales executive at four public corporations, each company a supplier of analytical and life sciences instrumentation, software, consumables and service. Prior to those positions, his 19 year career in Hewlett-Packard Company’s Analytical Products Group included worldwide sales and marketing responsibility for Bioscience Products, Global Accounts and the International Olympic Committee.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-12--Water & Incredible Heat Revealed In World’s Deepest Borehole

Deep in western Russia , if you know where to look , you ’ ll find a small collection of ragged scrap metal and crumbled concrete .
Which isn ’ t that exciting .
But if you rifle through the rubble , you will find a large metal disc bolted to the ground .
This isn ’ t just any old disc – it ’ s the welded-shut cap of a borehole that plummets more than 12 kilometres ( 7.5 miles ) into the Earth .
How deep is 12 kilometres , comparatively ?
Deeper than the deepest point of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In fact , this is the deepest hole we ’ ve ever dug into our planet .
It ’ s called the Kola Superdeep Borehole , and for once , it has nothing to do with extracting fossil fuels .
The borehole exists purely for the wonderful science of it all .
When Soviet scientists started drilling down into Earth ’ s surface during the 1970s , they did it to find out more about the contents of the planet ’ s crust .
“ Because the truth is , we know less @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than what ’ s on the other side of the Solar System , ” explains Hank Green in this 2014 episode of SciShow .
Over the next 24 years , these scientists kept at it on and off ; while they didn ’ t get down as far as they were hoping , by 1994 they ’ d made it just over 12 kilometres .
Which is certainly nothing to sniff at , because it happens to be a record-breaking dig that still stands today .
The drill technology they had to develop @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But what did we actually learn from all this hard work ?
As Green explains in his video , we learnt a whole lot !
Firstly , the fact that there ’ s water at 12 kilometres into Earth ’ s crust , which scientists wouldn ’ t have even thought possible had they not seen it with their own eyes .
And almost 7 kilometres down ( 4.4 miles ) , they found microscopic fossils of 24 species of long-dead single-celled organisms .
They also gained access to rocks 2.7 billion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but these rocks became the challenge that the scientists just could not overcome .
Why ?
Because their temperature was around 180 degrees Celsius ( 356 degrees Fahrenheit ) , about 80 hotter than what the scientists predicted , and they couldn ’ t get past this heat .
Will we ever figure out how to get down further than this ?
Well , 1994 was a long time ago , so never say never .
A version of this article was first published in March 2015 .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Water & Incredible Heat Revealed In World’s Deepest Borehole
Written by www.sciencealert.com
Deep in western Russia, if you know where to look, you’ll find a small collection of ragged scrap metal and crumbled concrete. Which isn’t that exciting.
But if you rifle through the rubble, you will find a large metal disc bolted to the ground. This isn’t just any old disc – it’s the welded-shut cap of a borehole that plummets more than 12 kilometres (7.5 miles) into the Earth.
How deep is 12 kilometres, comparatively? Deeper than the deepest point of the ocean – the Mariana Trench. In fact, this is the deepest hole we’ve ever dug into our planet.
It’s called the Kola Superdeep Borehole, and for once, it has nothing to do with extracting fossil fuels. The borehole exists purely for the wonderful science of it all.
When Soviet scientists started drilling down into Earth’s surface during the 1970s, they did it to find out more about the contents of the planet’s crust.
“Because the truth is, we know less about what’s under our feet than what’s on the other side of the Solar System,” explains Hank Green in this 2014 episode of SciShow.
Over the next 24 years, these scientists kept at it on and off; while they didn’t get down as far as they were hoping, by 1994 they’d made it just over 12 kilometres.
Which is certainly nothing to sniff at, because it happens to be a record-breaking dig that still stands today. The drill technology they had to develop to get down there is pretty remarkable.
But what did we actually learn from all this hard work? As Green explains in his video, we learnt a whole lot!
Firstly, the fact that there’s water at 12 kilometres into Earth’s crust, which scientists wouldn’t have even thought possible had they not seen it with their own eyes.
And almost 7 kilometres down (4.4 miles), they found microscopic fossils of 24 species of long-dead single-celled organisms.
They also gained access to rocks 2.7 billion years old, which is awesome – but these rocks became the challenge that the scientists just could not overcome.
Why? Because their temperature was around 180 degrees Celsius (356 degrees Fahrenheit), about 80 hotter than what the scientists predicted, and they couldn’t get past this heat.
Will we ever figure out how to get down further than this? Well, 1994 was a long time ago, so never say never.
A version of this article was first published in March 2015.
Read more at www.sciencealert.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-12--Despite Record Crops, Fake Media Claims Ethiopia in ‘Climate Crisis’

Among the top Google News search results today for “ climate change , ” an article at Insider.com claims “ food insecurity from climate change ” is “ pushing millions of people into cities.
” In reality , Ethiopian crop yields are enjoying consistent , impressive gains , and are setting new records virtually every year .
Also , Ethiopia ’ s rural population is growing , not shrinking , as higher crop yields support more farmers and more food production .
The Insider.com article being promoted by Google is a perfect example of the dishonest claims made by proponents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ article , titled , “ Climate change is pushing millions of people into cities like Addis Ababa .
Here ’ s what rapid urbanization looks like in the Ethiopian capital , ” asserts that World Health Organization predictions of a growing Ethiopian urban population prove that climate change is devastating crop production and driving people into cities .
But that is faulty logic that defies objective reality .
In reality , Ethiopia is benefiting from increasing food production and rapid economic growth in its cities .
This economic growth is not forcing people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enticing many Ethiopians into cities with better-paying jobs and the cultural and social attractions of urban life .
Data from the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization ( FAO ) , charted below , show remarkable growth in Ethiopian crop yields as the Earth continues its modest warming .
Crop yields per acre are currently 80 percent higher than just a decade ago , and double what they were in the year 2000 .
Moreover , the FAO reports that fully half the Ethiopian population was undernourished in the year 2000 , while @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is undernourished today .
It is amazing that a “ news ” article at Insider.com can paint this spectacular crop growth and beneficial improvement in nutrition as “ food insecurity from climate change.
” About the only thing that is true in the Insider.com article is that Ethiopia is experiencing dramatic urban population growth .
However , it is a lie that urban growth is being caused by climate change destabilizing food production , and forcing people into cities .
According to the FAO , Ethiopia ’ s urban areas have added 13 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ However , Ethiopia ’ s rural areas have added 28 million people since the year 2000 .
Ethiopia ’ s urban and rural areas are gaining population – with rural areas experiencing the largest growth – as increasing crop yields sustain more population and bring more wealth to the nation ’ s people .
World Bank economic data illustrate this .
Per the World Bank : “ Ethiopia ’ s economy experienced strong , broad-based growth averaging 9.9 percent a year from 2007/08 to 2017/18 , compared to a regional average of 5.4 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and services accounted for most of the growth .
… Higher economic growth brought with it positive trends in poverty reduction in both urban and rural areas .
The share of the population living below the national poverty line decreased from 30 % in 2011 to 24 % in 2016.
” In summary , Ethiopia is enjoying spectacular gains in crop yields that are supporting a rapidly growing population and dramatic growth in both urban and rural populations .
The growth in Ethiopia ’ s urban population is clearly and inarguably a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and a wealthier population rather than mythical food insecurity .
But the easily discernible and reassuring truth doesn ’ t promote climate alarmism .
Therefore , the media lie and invent a false narrative .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Despite Record Crops, Fake Media Claims Ethiopia in ‘Climate Crisis’
Written by H Sterling Burnett
Among the top Google News search results today for “climate change,” an article at Insider.com claims “food insecurity from climate change” is “pushing millions of people into cities.”
In reality, Ethiopian crop yields are enjoying consistent, impressive gains, and are setting new records virtually every year.
Also, Ethiopia’s rural population is growing, not shrinking, as higher crop yields support more farmers and more food production.
The Insider.com article being promoted by Google is a perfect example of the dishonest claims made by proponents of the Climate Delusion.
The Insider.com article, titled, “Climate change is pushing millions of people into cities like Addis Ababa. Here’s what rapid urbanization looks like in the Ethiopian capital,” asserts that World Health Organization predictions of a growing Ethiopian urban population prove that climate change is devastating crop production and driving people into cities.
But that is faulty logic that defies objective reality. In reality, Ethiopia is benefiting from increasing food production and rapid economic growth in its cities.
This economic growth is not forcing people away from the farms, but rather enticing many Ethiopians into cities with better-paying jobs and the cultural and social attractions of urban life.
Data from the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization(FAO), charted below, show remarkable growth in Ethiopian crop yields as the Earth continues its modest warming.
Crop yields per acre are currently 80 percent higher than just a decade ago, and double what they were in the year 2000.
Moreover, the FAO reports that fully half the Ethiopian population was undernourished in the year 2000, while less than 20 percent of the population is undernourished today.
It is amazing that a “news” article at Insider.com can paint this spectacular crop growth and beneficial improvement in nutrition as “food insecurity from climate change.”
About the only thing that is true in the Insider.com article is that Ethiopia is experiencing dramatic urban population growth.
However, it is a lie that urban growth is being caused by climate change destabilizing food production, and forcing people into cities.
According to the FAO, Ethiopia’s urban areas have added 13 million people since the year 2000. However, Ethiopia’s rural areas have added 28 million people since the year 2000.
Ethiopia’s urban and rural areas are gaining population – with rural areas experiencing the largest growth – as increasing crop yields sustain more population and bring more wealth to the nation’s people.
World Bank economic data illustrate this. Per the World Bank:
“Ethiopia’s economy experienced strong, broad-based growth averaging 9.9 percent a year from 2007/08 to 2017/18, compared to a regional average of 5.4%. … Industry, mainly construction, and services accounted for most of the growth. … Higher economic growth brought with it positive trends in poverty reduction in both urban and rural areas. The share of the population living below the national poverty line decreased from 30% in 2011 to 24% in 2016.”
In summary, Ethiopia is enjoying spectacular gains in crop yields that are supporting a rapidly growing population and dramatic growth in both urban and rural populations.
The growth in Ethiopia’s urban population is clearly and inarguably a result of spectacular increases in food production and a wealthier population rather than mythical food insecurity.
But the easily discernible and reassuring truth doesn’t promote climate alarmism. Therefore, the media lie and invent a false narrative.
Read more at Climate Realism
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-12--Aussie Professor: Ivermectin ‘Amazingly Successful’ Against Coronavirus

“ Because I ’ m involved in developing these in the U.S. where all the patients are , there are a number of studies that are amazingly successful .
We ’ re talking close to 100 % .
“ In fact , we haven ’ t seen a result yet under 100 % .
It looks like corona is very simple to kill , ” Professor Thomas Borody , medical director of Australia ’ s Center for Digestive Disease .
“ It ’ s available as a prescription medication .
You wouldn ’ t use it alone … but you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as doxycycline and zinc.
” Ivermectin is already approved by the FDA and is on the World Health Organization ’ s list of model list of essential medicines .
“ We had a 14-hospital trial in Bangladesh .
We got [ cured ] 100 out of 100 .
In China , they tried to reproduce it .
They got 60 out of 60 cured … “ So I am behind the Ivermectin , doxycycline , zinc treatment because it has very few side effects and is a real killer of coronavirus , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tablet could cost as little as $ 2 , which is likely why drugmakers haven ’ t promoted the drug ’ s usage .
He also suggested that have a cure for the disease easily would do away with the need for people to be hospitalized , which would make doctors less money .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend @ @ @ @

“Because I’m involved in developing these in the U.S. where all the patients are, there are a number of studies that are amazingly successful. We’re talking close to 100%. “In fact, we haven’t seen a result yet under 100%. It looks like corona is very simple to kill,” Professor Thomas Borody, medical director of Australia’s Center for Digestive Disease. “It’s available as a prescription medication. You wouldn’t use it alone … but you add two other things to it such as doxycycline and zinc.”
Ivermectin is already approved by the FDA and is on the World Health Organization’s list of model list of essential medicines.
“We had a 14-hospital trial in Bangladesh. We got [cured] 100 out of 100. In China, they tried to reproduce it. They got 60 out of 60 cured … “So I am behind the Ivermectin, doxycycline, zinc treatment because it has very few side effects and is a real killer of coronavirus,” Borody said.
Borody said the Ivermectin tablet could cost as little as $2, which is likely why drugmakers haven’t promoted the drug’s usage.
He also suggested that have a cure for the disease easily would do away with the need for people to be hospitalized, which would make doctors less money.
“There’s no huge pharmaceutical company behind it to spend millions of dollars and put people in places to treat,” Borody said.
Read more at humansarefree.com ****
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-12--Bulgarian Pathology Association: COVID Tests ‘Scientifically Meaningless’

Lockdowns and hygienic measures around the world are based on numbers of cases and mortality rates created by the so-called SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests used to identify “ positive ” patients , whereby “ positive ” is usually equated with “ infected.
” But looking closely at the facts , the conclusion is that these PCR tests are meaningless as a diagnostic tool to determine an alleged infection by a supposedly new virus called SARS-CoV-2 .
At the media briefing on COVID-19 on March 16 , 2020 , the WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said : The message was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for instance by Reuters and the BBC .
Still on the 3 of May , the moderator of the heute journal — one of the most important news magazines on German television— was passing the mantra of the corona dogma on to his audience with the admonishing words : This indicates that the belief in the validity of the PCR tests is so strong that it equals a religion that tolerates virtually no contradiction .
But it is well known that religions are about faith and not about scientific facts .
And as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ winner and perhaps the most influential journalist of the 20th century said : “ Where all think alike , no one thinks very much.
” So to start , it is very remarkable that Kary Mullis himself , the inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction ( PCR ) technology , did not think alike .
His invention got him the Nobel prize in chemistry in 1993 .
Unfortunately , Mullis passed away last year at the age of 74 , but there is no doubt that the biochemist regarded the PCR as inappropriate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reason is that the intended use of the PCR was , and still is , to apply it as a manufacturing technique , being able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times , and not as a diagnostic tool to detect viruses .
How declaring virus pandemics based on PCR tests can end in disaster was described by Gina Kolata in her 2007 New York Times article Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn ’ t .
Moreover , it is worth mentioning that the PCR tests used to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what is called SARS-CoV-2 do not have a valid gold standard to compare them with .
This is a fundamental point .
Tests need to be evaluated to determine their preciseness — strictly speaking their “ sensitivity ” [ 1 ] and “ specificity ” — by comparison with a “ gold standard , ” meaning the most accurate method available .
As an example , for a pregnancy test the gold standard would be the pregnancy itself .
But as Australian infectious diseases specialist Sanjaya Senanayake , for example , stated in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the question “ How accurate is the [ COVID-19 ] testing ?
” : Jessica C. Watson from Bristol University confirms this .
In her paper “ Interpreting a COVID-19 test result ” , published recently in The British Medical Journal , she writes that there is a “ lack of such a clear-cut ‘ gold-standard ’ for COVID-19 testing.
” But instead of classifying the tests as unsuitable for SARS-CoV-2 detection and COVID-19 diagnosis , or instead of pointing out that only a virus , proven through isolation and purification , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Watson claims in all seriousness that , “ pragmatically ” COVID-19 diagnosis itself , remarkably including PCR testing itself , “ may be the best available ‘ gold standard ’ .
” But this is not scientifically sound .
Apart from the fact that it is downright absurd to take the PCR test itself as part of the gold standard to evaluate the PCR test , there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19 , as even people such as Thomas Löscher , former head of the Department of Infection and Tropical Medicine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Federal Association of German Internists , conceded to us [ 2 ] .
And if there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19 , COVID-19 diagnosis — contrary to Watson ’ s statement — can not be suitable for serving as a valid gold standard .
In addition , “ experts ” such as Watson overlook the fact that only virus isolation , i.e .
an unequivocal virus proof , can be the gold standard .
That is why I asked Watson how COVID-19 diagnosis “ may be the best available @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19 , and also whether the virus itself , that is virus isolation , wouldn ’ t be the best available/possible gold standard .
But she hasn ’ t answered these questions yet – despite multiple requests .
And she has not yet responded to our rapid response post on her article in which we address exactly the same points , either , though she wrote us on June 2nd : “ I will try to post a reply later this week when I have a chance.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ VIRAL ORIGIN Now the question is : What is required first for virus isolation/proof ?
We need to know where the RNA for which the PCR tests are calibrated comes from .
As textbooks ( e.g.
, White/Fenner .
Medical Virology , 1986 , p. 9 ) as well as leading virus researchers such as Luc Montagnier or Dominic Dwyer state , particle purification — i.e .
the separation of an object from everything else that is not that object , as for instance Nobel laureate Marie Curie purified 100 mg of radium @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tons of pitchblende — is an essential pre-requisite for proving the existence of a virus , and thus to prove that the RNA from the particle in question comes from a new virus .
The reason for this is that PCR is extremely sensitive , which means it can detect even the smallest pieces of DNA or RNA — but it can not determine where these particles came from .
That has to be determined beforehand .
And because the PCR tests are calibrated for gene sequences ( in this case RNA sequences @ @ @ @ @ @ @ RNA virus ) , we have to know that these gene snippets are part of the looked-for virus .
And to know that , correct isolation and purification of the presumed virus has to be executed .
Hence , we have asked the science teams of the relevant papers which are referred to in the context of SARS-CoV-2 for proof whether the electron-microscopic shots depicted in their in vitro experiments show purified viruses .
But not a single team could answer that question with “ yes ” — and NB.
, nobody said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ We only got answers like “ No , we did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification ” ( see below ) .
Study 1 : Leo L. M. Poon ; Malik Peiris .
“ Emergence of a novel human coronavirus threatening human health ” Nature Medicine , March 2020 Replying Author : Malik Peiris Date : May 12 , 2020 Answer : “ The image is the virus budding from an infected cell .
It is not purified virus.
” Study 2 : Myung-Guk Han et al .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Korea with COVID-19 ” , Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives , February 2020 Replying Author : Myung-Guk Han Date : May 6 , 2020 Answer : “ We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells.
” Study 3 : Wan Beom Park et al .
“ Virus Isolation from the First Patient with SARS-CoV-2 in Korea ” , Journal of Korean Medical Science , February 24 , 2020 Replying Author : Wan Beom Park Date : March 19 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.
” Study 4 : Na Zhu et al.
, “ A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China ” , 2019 , New England Journal of Medicine , February 20 , 2020 Replying Author : Wenjie Tan Date : March 18 , 2020 Answer : “ [ We show ] an image of sedimented virus particles , not purified ones.
” For more read here : bpa-pathology.com PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Written by Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter
The Bulgarian Pathology Association publishes denouncement of mass testing for COVID-19. Though the whole world relies on RT-PCR to “diagnose” Sars-Cov-2 infection, the science is clear: they are not fit for purpose.
Lockdowns and hygienic measures around the world are based on numbers of cases and mortality rates created by the so-called SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests used to identify “positive” patients, whereby “positive” is usually equated with “infected.”
But looking closely at the facts, the conclusion is that these PCR tests are meaningless as a diagnostic tool to determine an alleged infection by a supposedly new virus called SARS-CoV-2.
UNFOUNDED “TEST, TEST, TEST,…” MANTRA
At the media briefing on COVID-19 on March 16, 2020, the WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said:
We have a simple message for all countries: test, test, test.”
The message was spread through headlines around the world, for instance by Reuters and the BBC.
Still on the 3 of May, the moderator of the heute journal — one of the most important news magazines on German television— was passing the mantra of the corona dogma on to his audience with the admonishing words:
Test, test, test—that is the credo at the moment, and it is the only way to really understand how much the coronavirus is spreading.”
This indicates that the belief in the validity of the PCR tests is so strong that it equals a religion that tolerates virtually no contradiction.
But it is well known that religions are about faith and not about scientific facts. And as Walter Lippmann, the two-time Pulitzer Prize winner and perhaps the most influential journalist of the 20th century said: “Where all think alike, no one thinks very much.”
So to start, it is very remarkable that Kary Mullis himself, the inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology, did not think alike. His invention got him the Nobel prize in chemistry in 1993.
Unfortunately, Mullis passed away last year at the age of 74, but there is no doubt that the biochemist regarded the PCR as inappropriate to detect a viral infection.
The reason is that the intended use of the PCR was, and still is, to apply it as a manufacturing technique, being able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times, and not as a diagnostic tool to detect viruses.
How declaring virus pandemics based on PCR tests can end in disaster was described by Gina Kolata in her 2007 New York Times article Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.
LACK OF A VALID GOLD STANDARD
Moreover, it is worth mentioning that the PCR tests used to identify so-called COVID-19 patients presumably infected by what is called SARS-CoV-2 do not have a valid gold standard to compare them with.
This is a fundamental point. Tests need to be evaluated to determine their preciseness — strictly speaking their “sensitivity”[1] and “specificity” — by comparison with a “gold standard,” meaning the most accurate method available.
As an example, for a pregnancy test the gold standard would be the pregnancy itself. But as Australian infectious diseases specialist Sanjaya Senanayake, for example, stated in an ABC TV interview in an answer to the question “How accurate is the [COVID-19] testing?”:
If we had a new test for picking up [the bacterium] golden staph in blood, we’ve already got blood cultures, that’s our gold standard we’ve been using for decades, and we could match this new test against that. But for COVID-19 we don’t have a gold standard test.”
Jessica C. Watson from Bristol University confirms this. In her paper “Interpreting a COVID-19 test result”, published recently in The British Medical Journal, she writes that there is a “lack of such a clear-cut ‘gold-standard’ for COVID-19 testing.”
But instead of classifying the tests as unsuitable for SARS-CoV-2 detection and COVID-19 diagnosis, or instead of pointing out that only a virus, proven through isolation and purification, can be a solid gold standard, Watson claims in all seriousness that, “pragmatically” COVID-19 diagnosis itself, remarkably including PCR testing itself, “may be the best available ‘gold standard’.” But this is not scientifically sound.
Apart from the fact that it is downright absurd to take the PCR test itself as part of the gold standard to evaluate the PCR test, there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19, as even people such as Thomas Löscher, former head of the Department of Infection and Tropical Medicine at the University of Munich and member of the Federal Association of German Internists, conceded to us[2].
And if there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19, COVID-19 diagnosis — contrary to Watson’s statement — cannot be suitable for serving as a valid gold standard.
In addition, “experts” such as Watson overlook the fact that only virus isolation, i.e. an unequivocal virus proof, can be the gold standard.
That is why I asked Watson how COVID-19 diagnosis “may be the best available gold standard,” if there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19, and also whether the virus itself, that is virus isolation, wouldn’t be the best available/possible gold standard. But she hasn’t answered these questions yet – despite multiple requests. And she has not yet responded to our rapid response post on her article in which we address exactly the same points, either, though she wrote us on June 2nd: “I will try to post a reply later this week when I have a chance.”
NO PROOF FOR THE RNA BEING OF VIRAL ORIGIN
Now the question is: What is required first for virus isolation/proof? We need to know where the RNA for which the PCR tests are calibrated comes from.
As textbooks (e.g., White/Fenner. Medical Virology, 1986, p. 9) as well as leading virus researchers such as Luc Montagnier or Dominic Dwyer state, particle purification — i.e. the separation of an object from everything else that is not that object, as for instance Nobel laureate Marie Curie purified 100 mg of radium chloride in 1898 by extracting it from tons of pitchblende — is an essential pre-requisite for proving the existence of a virus, and thus to prove that the RNA from the particle in question comes from a new virus.
The reason for this is that PCR is extremely sensitive, which means it can detect even the smallest pieces of DNA or RNA — but it cannot determine where these particles came from. That has to be determined beforehand.
And because the PCR tests are calibrated for gene sequences (in this case RNA sequences because SARS-CoV-2 is believed to be a RNA virus), we have to know that these gene snippets are part of the looked-for virus. And to know that, correct isolation and purification of the presumed virus has to be executed.
Hence, we have asked the science teams of the relevant papers which are referred to in the context of SARS-CoV-2 for proof whether the electron-microscopic shots depicted in their in vitro experiments show purified viruses.
But not a single team could answer that question with “yes” — and NB., nobody said purification was not a necessary step. We only got answers like “No, we did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification” (see below).
Study 1: Leo L. M. Poon; Malik Peiris. “Emergence of a novel human coronavirus threatening human health” Nature Medicine, March 2020
Replying Author: Malik Peiris
Date: May 12, 2020
Answer: “The image is the virus budding from an infected cell. It is not purified virus.”
Study 2: Myung-Guk Han et al. “Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with COVID-19”, Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives, February 2020
Replying Author: Myung-Guk Han
Date: May 6, 2020
Answer: “We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells.”
Study 3: Wan Beom Park et al. “Virus Isolation from the First Patient with SARS-CoV-2 in Korea”, Journal of Korean Medical Science, February 24, 2020
Replying Author: Wan Beom Park
Date: March 19, 2020
Answer: “We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.”
Study 4: Na Zhu et al., “A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China”, 2019, New England Journal of Medicine, February 20, 2020
Replying Author: Wenjie Tan
Date: March 18, 2020
Answer: “[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones.”
For more read here: bpa-pathology.com
****
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-13--Hydroxychloroquine ‘SAFER than Tylenol’

Hydroxychloroquine ‘SAFER than Tylenol’

On a recent episode of “ Slightly Offens*ve , ” BlazeTV ’ s Elijah Schaffer headed to Washington , D.C. @ @ @ @ @ members of “ America ’ s Frontline Doctors , ” the group of medical professionals @ @ @ @ @ of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 was removed by Twitter , Facebook , YouTube , and @ @ @ @ @ false information.
” NOTE : After first banning this video for “ inappropriate content , @ @ @ @ @ re-air this episode with the following disclaimer : Some medical opinions in this show do @ @ @ @ @ , and local health official recommendations for treating COVID-19 .
Any and all statements should @ @ @ @ @ Viewer discretion is advised .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as @ @ @ @ @ purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please @ @ @ @ @ Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Hydroxychloroquine ‘SAFER than Tylenol’
Written by Elijah Schaffer
On a recent episode of “Slightly Offens*ve,” BlazeTV’s Elijah Schaffer headed to Washington, D.C., to meet with several members of “America’s Frontline Doctors,” the group of medical professionals whose video about the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 was removed by Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and other sites for “sharing false information.”
NOTE: After first banning this video for “inappropriate content,” YouTube has agreed to re-air this episode with the following disclaimer: Some medical opinions in this show do not follow WHO, CDC, and local health official recommendations for treating COVID-19. Any and all statements should be taken with precaution. Viewer discretion is advised.
Watch the video below:
Read more at www.theblaze.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-13--Top WHO Diseases Expert: No More National Lockdowns

Top WHO Diseases Expert : No More National Lockdowns Dr Maria Van Kerkhove , who helps lead the WHO ’ s pandemic response , said that ‘ localised ’ measures should instead be used to stem Covid-19 .
The World Health Organisation has urged countries not to reimpose national lockdowns in an attempt to stem the spread of Covid-19 due to the health , social and economic repercussions .
In an exclusive interview with The Telegraph Dr Maria Van Kerkhove , who helps lead the WHO ’ s pandemic response team as the head of the emerging diseases unit , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ strategies .
By the end of March , as the coronavirus outbreak spiralled out of control across the globe , well over 100 countries had imposed a full or partial lockdown – affecting billions of people .
Dr Van Kerkhove described these measures as a “ blunt , sheer force instrument ” that bought countries time to build the public health infrastructure needed to tackle Covid-19 .
But reflecting on events since the WHO declared a global health emergency six months ago – when fewer than 8,000 cases and 170 deaths had been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , health and social costs of lockdown have been “ massive ” .
“ Lockdowns are not something that WHO recommended , but they needed to be used in a number of countries because the outbreaks were growing so quickly , ” Dr Van Kerkhove said .
“ But we ’ re hopeful that countries will not need to implement national lockdowns again.
” PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Top WHO Diseases Expert: No More National Lockdowns
Written by Sarah Newey
Dr Maria Van Kerkhove, who helps lead the WHO’s pandemic response, said that ‘localised’ measures should instead be used to stem Covid-19.
The World Health Organisation has urged countries not to reimpose national lockdowns in an attempt to stem the spread of Covid-19 due to the health, social and economic repercussions.
In an exclusive interview with The Telegraph Dr Maria Van Kerkhove, who helps lead the WHO’s pandemic response team as the head of the emerging diseases unit, said that countries should instead adopt localised strategies.
By the end of March, as the coronavirus outbreak spiralled out of control across the globe, well over 100 countries had imposed a full or partial lockdown – affecting billions of people.
Dr Van Kerkhove described these measures as a “blunt, sheer force instrument” that bought countries time to build the public health infrastructure needed to tackle Covid-19.
But reflecting on events since the WHO declared a global health emergency six months ago – when fewer than 8,000 cases and 170 deaths had been reported – she added that the economic, health and social costs of lockdown have been “massive”.
“Lockdowns are not something that WHO recommended, but they needed to be used in a number of countries because the outbreaks were growing so quickly,” Dr Van Kerkhove said. “But we’re hopeful that countries will not need to implement national lockdowns again.”
Read the full story at www.telegraph.co.uk
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-13--Entangled Attractions: A Story of Negatrons, Gravitons & Strings

This article is an abridged version of the detailed paper published at www.bosmin.com .
This paper follows on from the PROM review of Black Hole Radiation – Entangled Gravity , and concentrates on the part Negatrons , Gravitons , Gravity Strings and Entangled particles might play in establishing gravity throughout the universe .
The paper provides an explanation of how the Graviton particle might form near a black hole ( BH ) event horizon .
Electrons are generally considered to be fundamental particles , but there appears to be evidence that a BH environment includes both Positron and Negatron particles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Negatrons appear to form Gravitons which are associated with forming gravity , and are fundamental for associating General Relativity gravity with Quantum gravity .
This resulted in redrafting the • The gravity impact on time dilation is discussed .
Electrons can form into Positroniums , which include a Positron e+ and an Electron e- .
There is a level of confusion used in this terminology showing the word Electron appearing twice , and apparently referring to two different particle conditions .
This confusion extends to the entangled particles consideration where the Positron is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ [ 5 ] but inside the BH .
The naming anomaly was referred to in 1930 : [ 6 ] Dirac developed in 1930 a model of the vacuum as an infinite sea of particles with negative energy , later dubbed the Dirac sea .
This led him to predict the existence of a positron , the antimatter counterpart of the electron .
This particle was discovered in 1932 by Carl Anderson , ( Carl David Anderson ( September 3 , 1905 – January 11 , 1991 ) was an American physicist .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the positron in 1932 , an achievement for which he received the 1936 Nobel Prize in Physics , and of the muon in 1936 ) who proposed calling standard electrons negatons ( Negatrons ) and using electron as a generic term to describe both the positively and negatively charged variants .
If we pursue this line of thought along with entangled particles at a BH , it makes sense to formalise this distinction as shown as Figure 2 .
Figure 2 , is a diagrammatic representation of the Standard Model of Elementary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ See www.bosmin.com/PSL/AppendixA.pdf ) which is now adjusted to include the Negatron , Positron , and Graviton .
The Negatron and Positron is a combination of matter and anti-matter , and forms a Positronium inherent to an Electron which has one negative charge .
However , the Positron has one positive charge , so the Negatron needs two potential negatives to balance the charges .
Positrons have recently been discovered in space in significant numbers : [ 7 ] An excess of positrons has been detected by the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer ( AMS ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ perch on the International Space Station .
This raises the question , where are the anti-particle electrons matching these Positrons ?
Another way to describe this situation is for an Electron without a Positron to be regarded as similar to a Neutron without a stabilizing Proton , making the Neutron an unstable ‘ free ’ Neutron .
Similarly , the Electron without its Positron can be regarded as a ‘ free ’ Electron , but herein referred to as a Negatron .
A Negatron and Positron combine to form a Positronium .
Outside @ @ @ @ @ @ @ charge showing positive during the 50 % of orbit time , and negative during the other 50 % .
However , a Negatron attaching to a Positron , but sited inside a BH , can not show a positive charge for 50 % of time , because the Positron component is permanently attached to a free Neutron inside the BH .
Details shown at reference [ 2 ] .
This Positronium orbit only shows continuous negative charges .
A Positronium forming into an Electron normally appears to alter charge + – + – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with a BH has a charge appearance of – – – – – – now shown as e- & - ( e minus and minus ) in Figures 2 and 4 .
Figure 4 is derived from a study of the Kruskal Szekeres diagram , [ 8 ] and illustrates a hyperbolic geometry interpretation of a BH .
A key indicator shows mass entering a BH is separated into atomic components due to the high gravity force which is in excess of the electrostatic attraction between the atomic particles .
This results in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Neutrons .
The Protons escape the BH as Cosmic Rays travelling at close to the speed of light .
[ 9 ] Electrons include both Positrons and Negatrons , but with the Positrons attaching to the free Neutrons when inside the BH .
This stabilizes the free Neutrons , and prevents atomic decay .
The e- & - energy charge associated with the Negatron , transfers into a two-spin motion .
This allows the uncharged Negatron to escape through the event horizon .
However , a Negatron must also be massless to escape @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the inherent mass of the Positronium lies exclusively with the Positron remaining inside the BH , and the Negatron has zero mass .
This particle emerging from the event horizon has a spin of 2 , is massless , and without charge , now described as a Graviton , and capable of exiting a BH environment .
It is interesting to note that the life of a BH depends on a fairly continuous supply of raw material .
If incoming mass stops , the BH becomes unstable through the dissipation of Positron particles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which would return to being free Neutrons .
The Standard Model of Elementary Particles is included in Appendix-A .
However , [ 10 ] “ the Standard Model is inconsistent with that of general relativity , to the point where one or both theories break down under certain conditions .
Theories that lie beyond the Standard Model include various extensions of the standard model through supersymmetry , such as the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model ( MSSM ) and Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model ( NMSSM ) .
” The Model of Elementary Particles is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , with Positron , Negatron , and Graviton shown in Figure 5 .
Figure 5 shows the Negatron added under the Scalar Bosons grouping and the Graviton sited in the Tensor Boson column .
In this location more than one boson ( Higgs and Graviton ) can associate with atomic particles to deliver both atomic mass and gravity .
Gauge ( Vector ) Boson definition : “ The weak gauge bosons were discovered due to momentum change in electrons from neutrino-Z exchange .
The massless photon mediates the electromagnetic interaction .
These four @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elementary particles.
” Scalar Boson definition : “ A scalar boson is a boson whose spin equals zero .
Boson means that it has an integer-valued spin ; the scalar fixes this value to 0 .
The name scalar boson arises from quantum field theory .
It refers to the particular transformation properties under Lorentz transformation.
” Tensor Boson has a spin of 2 and is associated with the anticipated Graviton particle .
“ They are described by a Tensor of 2nd rank .
A scalar is a Tensor of 0th rank and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spin-0-particle , a vector is Tensor of 1st rank and if a particle is a vector boson , it is a spin-1-particle.
” This position fits with our general understanding of Fermions and Bosons shown in Appendix-B Fermions and Bosons , [ 11 ] Exhibit 2 and indicates that Gravitons could associate with atoms containing an even number of neutrons and protons .
The Higgs boson is responsible for featuring the mass property of an atom , and the Graviton has long been thought to provide the gravity property associated with mass .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ String theory which is proposed to bridge the knowledge gap between Quantum gravity and Einstein ’ s theory of gravity .
The Positronium combination discussed previously resulted in an entangled association between the Negatron outside the event horizon and the Positron within the BH .
Under these circumstances the Negatron e- & - charge transforms into a Graviton with spin of 2 , which is suited for incorporation within the String Theory .
[ 13 ] Also from Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik , Albert-Einstein-Institut , Mühlenberg 1 , D-14476 Potsdam , Germany , August @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is different .
It is mediated by particles ( gravitons ) of spin 2 , unlike the other known forces in nature ( electromagnetism and the strong and weak interactions ) , which are carried by particles of spin 1 .
This explains why like gravitational charges ( that is , masses ) attract , whereas in electrostatics , like charges repel , thereby accounting for the fact that gravity dominates physics at large distances , despite its incredible weakness in comparison with the other fundamental forces ( think of a little magnet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the gravitational pull of the whole planet Earth ) .
Modern understanding of gravity rests on Einstein ’ s theory of general relativity .
This theory is based on the principle of general covariance ( according to which , the laws of physics should not depend on which coordinate system is used to formulate them ) and the principle of equivalence , enabling Einstein to write down “ in one stroke ” his gravitational field equations and thereby to revolutionize our understanding of gravity , replacing Newtonian gravity by a theory based on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ another key aspect in which gravity differs .
Matter is governed by the laws of quantum mechanics , but so far , Einstein ’ s theory has resisted all attempts to reconcile it with quantum mechanics .
If it exists , the graviton is expected to be massless because the gravitational force is very long range and appears to propagate at the speed of light .
The graviton must be a spin-2 boson because the source of gravitation is the stress–energy tensor , a second-order tensor ( compared with electromagnetism ’ s spin-1 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the four-current , a first-order tensor ) .
Additionally , it can be shown that any massless spin-2 field would give rise to a force indistinguishable from gravitation , because a massless spin-2 field would couple to the stress–energy tensor in the same way that gravitational interactions do .
This result suggests that , if a massless spin-2 particle is discovered , it must be the graviton .
So far , the Graviton has not been found in nature , but Negatrons and/or Gravitons appear to be entangled with Positrons inside a BH @ @ @ @ @ @ @ string tie between the mass molecules and the BH , to form a gravity bond .
Figure 7 shows a BH Electromagnetic Gravity String ( EGS ) Tie between the Graviton and a Chalcocite ( Cu S ) molecule .
The bond is preferably established with the sulphur atom , as a two-meson bond , discussed under Appendix B ( www.bosmin.com/PSL/AppendixB.pdf ) An EGS tie forms a double bond with the sulphur atom , involving both the proton and neutron , because elements with even atomic numbers on the Graviton Table of Elements @ @ @ @ @ @ @ twin spin Graviton boson .
This mechanism appears to provide the gravitational force holding mass together .
GPS satellites commonly require standardising to ensure their accuracy .
The problem arises because clocks run slower in strong gravitation fields , than they do in weaker fields .
Figure 8 , presented in my paper Natural Gravity [ 19 ] illustrates how electromagnetic gravity strings ( EGS ) appear to reach Earth .
Weaker gravity strings ( egs ) appear to retransmit from massive objects .
The net effect of both EGS and egs fields @ @ @ @ @ @ @ near to the mass object .
This slows object times through the mechanism of stronger gravity attraction between electrons and nuclei , which causes slower atomic activity .
These effects reach a critical level at BHs where gravity increases and time dilation slow to the point where molecules separate into their constituent components .
Newtonian Gravity G increases from 6.693×10-11 m3kg-1s-2 to G =6.693×1028 m3kg-1s-2 an increase of 1039 times , between the Solar system and V616 .
[ 19 ] Time dilation reduces by the reciprocal of this quantity until at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the molecular components separate into their constituent atomic particles .
• Positrons are unexpectedly plentiful in space , showing that an electron should not be regarded as a fundamental particle .
• A Positron can be captured by a free neutron in a BH environment resulting in the Negatron displaying an e- & - charge .
• The Kruskal Szekeres diagram illustrates the hyperbolic geometry present at a BH .
• The e- & - energy charge associated with the Negatron , transfers into a two-spin motion .
This particle emerging from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of 2 , is massless , and without charge , and described as a Graviton .
• The Positron combined with the free neutron inside the BH takes all the mass from the Positronium .
The massless Negatron is capable of leaving the BH as a Graviton .
• Gravitons provide the gravitational force which is very long range and appears to propagate at the speed of light .
Once the gravitational link is established , it remains entangled with its BH host , and provides instantaneous recognition to mass influences .
• @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Standard Model of Elementary Particles as Scalar and Tensor Bosons , respectively .
In these locations more than one boson can associate with atomic particles to deliver both atomic stability and gravity .
• Electrons are generally considered to be fundamental particles , but there is evidence that both Positron and Negatron particles derived from Electrons .
• If incoming mass stops , the BH could become unstable through dissipation of Positron particles , and gradually cease to exist .
• Identifying a possible source for the Graviton is a significant finding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ BH provides a step towards understanding the importance of BHs in the universe .
• The Graviton has not been found in nature , but may be a particle only found in an identifiable form near to a BH boundary .
• Negatrons entangled with their Positrons inside a BH may transit over the event horizon and radiate throughout space as Gravitons associated with the EGS gravity string effect .
In this mode particles form into a three-dimensional space-time structure .
• Time dilation occurs where gravity strings are more concentrated .
• @ @ @ @ @ @ @ overcome molecular electromagnetic attraction forces , at which point mass time ceases to exist .
About the author : Robert A. Beatty BE ( Minerals ) FAusIMM is an Honorary Research Consultant at The University of Queensland in recognition of his work on terrestrial evolution , planet orogeny and climate influences .
He has over thirty years ’ of broad experience in mine operations and planning for open cut and underground , coal and metalliferous mines .
Since 1980 he has operated as Principal of R.A. Beatty and Associates Pty Limited mine consulting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mark .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Entangled Attractions: A Story of Negatrons, Gravitons & Strings
Written by Robert A. Beatty BE (Minerals) FAusIMM
This article is an abridged version of the detailed paper published at www.bosmin.com.
SUMMARY
This paper follows on from the PROM review of Black Hole Radiation – Entangled Gravity, and concentrates on the part Negatrons, Gravitons, Gravity Strings and Entangled particles might play in establishing gravity throughout the universe.
The paper provides an explanation of how the Graviton particle might form near a black hole (BH) event horizon. Electrons are generally considered to be fundamental particles, but there appears to be evidence that a BH environment includes both Positron and Negatron particles derived from Electrons. Positrons entangled with Negatrons appear to form Gravitons which are associated with forming gravity, and are fundamental for associating General Relativity gravity with Quantum gravity. This resulted in redrafting the
Standard Model of Elementary Particles tabulation.
Positrons at a BH stabilise free Neutrons sited inside the BH.
The gravity impact on time dilation is discussed.
INTRODUCTION
Electrons can form into Positroniums, which include a Positron e+ and an Electron e-. There is a level of confusion used in this terminology showing the word Electron appearing twice, and apparently referring to two different particle conditions.
This confusion extends to the entangled particles consideration where the Positron is permanently captured by the Free Neutron,[5] but inside the BH.
NEGATRONS
The naming anomaly was referred to in 1930:[6]
Dirac developed in 1930 a model of the vacuum as an infinite sea of particles with negative energy, later dubbed the Dirac sea. This led him to predict the existence of a positron, the antimatter counterpart of the electron. This particle was discovered in 1932 by Carl Anderson, (Carl David Anderson (September 3, 1905 – January 11, 1991) was an American physicist. He is best known for his discovery of the positron in 1932, an achievement for which he received the 1936 Nobel Prize in Physics, and of the muon in 1936) who proposed calling standard electrons negatons (Negatrons) and using electron as a generic term to describe both the positively and negatively charged variants.
If we pursue this line of thought along with entangled particles at a BH, it makes sense to formalise this distinction as shown as Figure 2.
Figure 2
Figure 2, is a diagrammatic representation of the Standard Model of Elementary Particles information, filed in Appendix-A (See www.bosmin.com/PSL/AppendixA.pdf) which is now adjusted to include the Negatron, Positron, and Graviton.
The Negatron and Positron is a combination of matter and anti-matter, and forms a Positronium inherent to an Electron which has one negative charge. However, the Positron has one positive charge, so the Negatron needs two potential negatives to balance the charges.
POSITRONS
Positrons have recently been discovered in space in significant numbers:[7]
An excess of positrons has been detected by the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS), which collects cosmic rays from its perch on the International Space Station. This raises the question, where are the anti-particle electrons matching these Positrons?
Another way to describe this situation is for an Electron without a Positron to be regarded as similar to a Neutron without a stabilizing Proton, making the Neutron an unstable ‘free’ Neutron.
Similarly, the Electron without its Positron can be regarded as a ‘free’ Electron, but herein referred to as a Negatron.
A Negatron and Positron combine to form a Positronium. Outside a BH environment, it has a charge showing positive during the 50% of orbit time, and negative during the other 50%.
However, a Negatron attaching to a Positron, but sited inside a BH, cannot show a positive charge for 50% of time, because the Positron component is permanently attached to a free Neutron inside the BH. Details shown at reference[2]. This Positronium orbit only shows continuous negative charges.
A Positronium forming into an Electron normally appears to alter charge + – + – + -, but a Positronium associated with a BH has a charge appearance of – – – – – – now shown as e-&- (e minus and minus) in Figures 2 and 4.
GRAVITONS
Figure 4 is derived from a study of the Kruskal Szekeres diagram,[8] and illustrates a hyperbolic geometry interpretation of a BH.
A key indicator shows mass entering a BH is separated into atomic components due to the high gravity force which is in excess of the electrostatic attraction between the atomic particles. This results in Protons separating from Neutrons which become free Neutrons. The Protons escape the BH as Cosmic Rays travelling at close to the speed of light.[9] Electrons include both Positrons and Negatrons, but with the Positrons attaching to the free Neutrons when inside the BH. This stabilizes the free Neutrons, and prevents atomic decay.
The e-&- energy charge associated with the Negatron, transfers into a two-spin motion. This allows the uncharged Negatron to escape through the event horizon. However, a Negatron must also be massless to escape from the BH gravity well, so the inherent mass of the Positronium lies exclusively with the Positron remaining inside the BH, and the Negatron has zero mass. This particle emerging from the event horizon has a spin of 2, is massless, and without charge, now described as a Graviton, and capable of exiting a BH environment.
It is interesting to note that the life of a BH depends on a fairly continuous supply of raw material. If incoming mass stops, the BH becomes unstable through the dissipation of Positron particles leading to instability in the Neutron mass which would return to being free Neutrons.
REVISED STANDARD MODEL OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES
The Standard Model of Elementary Particles is included in Appendix-A.
However,[10] “the Standard Model is inconsistent with that of general relativity, to the point where one or both theories break down under certain conditions. Theories that lie beyond the Standard Model include various extensions of the standard model through supersymmetry, such as the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) and Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (NMSSM).”
The Model of Elementary Particles is redrawn to include the Tensor Boson column, with Positron, Negatron, and Graviton shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5 shows the Negatron added under the Scalar Bosons grouping and the Graviton sited in the Tensor Boson column. In this location more than one boson (Higgs and Graviton) can associate with atomic particles to deliver both atomic mass and gravity.
Gauge (Vector) Boson definition: “The weak gauge bosons were discovered due to momentum change in electrons from neutrino-Z exchange. The massless photon mediates the electromagnetic interaction. These four gauge bosons form the electroweak interaction among elementary particles.”
Scalar Boson definition: “A scalar boson is a boson whose spin equals zero. Boson means that it has an integer-valued spin; the scalar fixes this value to 0. The name scalar boson arises from quantum field theory. It refers to the particular transformation properties under Lorentz transformation.”
Tensor Boson has a spin of 2 and is associated with the anticipated Graviton particle. “They are described by a Tensor of 2nd rank. A scalar is a Tensor of 0th rank and therefore a scalar field particle is a spin-0-particle, a vector is Tensor of 1st rank and if a particle is a vector boson, it is a spin-1-particle.”
This position fits with our general understanding of Fermions and Bosons shown in Appendix-B Fermions and Bosons,[11] Exhibit 2 and indicates that Gravitons could associate with atoms containing an even number of neutrons and protons.
The Higgs boson is responsible for featuring the mass property of an atom, and the Graviton has long been thought to provide the gravity property associated with mass. The Graviton is an essential requirement in String theory which is proposed to bridge the knowledge gap between Quantum gravity and Einstein’s theory of gravity.
GRAVITON ASSOCIATION WITH STRINGS
The Positronium combination discussed previously resulted in an entangled association between the Negatron outside the event horizon and the Positron within the BH. Under these circumstances the Negatron e-&- charge transforms into a Graviton with spin of 2, which is suited for incorporation within the String Theory.[13] Also from Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik, Albert-Einstein-Institut, Mühlenberg 1, D-14476 Potsdam, Germany, August 17, 2009[15]
Gravity is different. It is mediated by particles (gravitons) of spin 2, unlike the other known forces in nature (electromagnetism and the strong and weak interactions), which are carried by particles of spin 1. This explains why like gravitational charges (that is, masses) attract, whereas in electrostatics, like charges repel, thereby accounting for the fact that gravity dominates physics at large distances, despite its incredible weakness in comparison with the other fundamental forces (think of a little magnet whose force on a safety pin beats the gravitational pull of the whole planet Earth). Modern understanding of gravity rests on Einstein’s theory of general relativity. This theory is based on the principle of general covariance (according to which, the laws of physics should not depend on which coordinate system is used to formulate them) and the principle of equivalence, enabling Einstein to write down “in one stroke” his gravitational field equations and thereby to revolutionize our understanding of gravity, replacing Newtonian gravity by a theory based on spacetime geometry and curvature.
There is another key aspect in which gravity differs. Matter is governed by the laws of quantum mechanics, but so far, Einstein’s theory has resisted all attempts to reconcile it with quantum mechanics.
And:[16]
If it exists, the graviton is expected to be massless because the gravitational force is very long range and appears to propagate at the speed of light. The graviton must be a spin-2 boson because the source of gravitation is the stress–energy tensor, a second-order tensor (compared with electromagnetism’s spin-1 photon, the source of which is the four-current, a first-order tensor). Additionally, it can be shown that any massless spin-2 field would give rise to a force indistinguishable from gravitation, because a massless spin-2 field would couple to the stress–energy tensor in the same way that gravitational interactions do. This result suggests that, if a massless spin-2 particle is discovered, it must be the graviton.
So far, the Graviton has not been found in nature, but Negatrons and/or Gravitons appear to be entangled with Positrons inside a BH.
GRAVITON ASSOCIATION WITH MOLECULES
This feature may distribute an entangled string tie between the mass molecules and the BH, to form a gravity bond.
Figure 7 shows a BH Electromagnetic Gravity String (EGS) Tie between the Graviton and a Chalcocite (Cu 2 S) molecule. The bond is preferably established with the sulphur atom, as a two-meson bond, discussed under Appendix B (www.bosmin.com/PSL/AppendixB.pdf)
An EGS tie forms a double bond with the sulphur atom, involving both the proton and neutron, because elements with even atomic numbers on the Graviton Table of Elements Figure 6, associate exclusively with the twin spin Graviton boson. This mechanism appears to provide the gravitational force holding mass together.
GRAVITY TIME DILATION [18]
GPS satellites commonly require standardising to ensure their accuracy. The problem arises because clocks run slower in strong gravitation fields, than they do in weaker fields. Figure 8, presented in my paper Natural Gravity[19] illustrates how electromagnetic gravity strings (EGS) appear to reach Earth. Weaker gravity strings (egs) appear to retransmit from massive objects.
Figure 8
The net effect of both EGS and egs fields are a more concentrated population of strings near to the mass object. This slows object times through the mechanism of stronger gravity attraction between electrons and nuclei, which causes slower atomic activity. These effects reach a critical level at BHs where gravity increases and time dilation slow to the point where molecules separate into their constituent components.
Newtonian Gravity G increases from 6.693×10-11 m3kg-1s-2 to G =6.693×1028 m3kg-1s-2 an increase of 1039 times, between the Solar system and V616.[19] Time dilation reduces by the reciprocal of this quantity until at the BH, time stops completely, because the molecular components separate into their constituent atomic particles.
CONCLUSIONS
Positrons are unexpectedly plentiful in space, showing that an electron should not be regarded as a fundamental particle. Negatrons are anti particles to Positrons. A Positron can be captured by a free neutron in a BH environment resulting in the Negatron displaying an e-&- charge. The Kruskal Szekeres diagram illustrates the hyperbolic geometry present at a BH. The e-&- energy charge associated with the Negatron, transfers into a two-spin motion. This particle emerging from the event horizon, transforms into a spin of 2, is massless, and without charge, and described as a Graviton. The Positron combined with the free neutron inside the BH takes all the mass from the Positronium. The massless Negatron is capable of leaving the BH as a Graviton. Gravitons provide the gravitational force which is very long range and appears to propagate at the speed of light. Once the gravitational link is established, it remains entangled with its BH host, and provides instantaneous recognition to mass influences. The Negatron and Graviton are shown in the Standard Model of Elementary Particles as Scalar and Tensor Bosons, respectively. In these locations more than one boson can associate with atomic particles to deliver both atomic stability and gravity. Electrons are generally considered to be fundamental particles, but there is evidence that both Positron and Negatron particles derived from Electrons. If incoming mass stops, the BH could become unstable through dissipation of Positron particles, and gradually cease to exist. Identifying a possible source for the Graviton is a significant finding. The proposed operation of a BH provides a step towards understanding the importance of BHs in the universe. The Graviton has not been found in nature, but may be a particle only found in an identifiable form near to a BH boundary. Negatrons entangled with their Positrons inside a BH may transit over the event horizon and radiate throughout space as Gravitons associated with the EGS gravity string effect. In this mode particles form into a three-dimensional space-time structure. Time dilation occurs where gravity strings are more concentrated. BH gravity levels are high enough to overcome molecular electromagnetic attraction forces, at which point mass time ceases to exist.
REFERENCES
[1] http://www.bosmin.com/PSL/NEGATRONS.pdf
[2] https://principia-scientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/blackholeradiationprom.pdf
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron#Free_neutron_decay
[4] https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_does_a_neutron_interact_with_atomic_electrons
[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron#Free_neutron_decay
[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron
[7] https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/PT.5.028274/full/
[8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kruskal%E2%80%93Szekeres_coordinates
[9] http://www.bosmin.com/PSL/M87Galaxy.pdf
[10] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics_beyond_the_Standard_Model
[11] https://particleadventure.org/fermibos.html
[12] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_table
[13] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory
[14] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-theory
[15] https://physics.aps.org/articles/v2/70
[16] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton
[17] https://www.quantamagazine.org/tensor-networks-and-entanglement-20150428/
[18] https://wtamu.edu/~cbaird/sq/mobile/2013/06/24/does-time-go-faster-at-the-top-of-a-building-compared-to-the-bottom/
[19] http://www.bosmin.com/PSL/InterstellarGravity.pdf
[20] http://www.bosmin.com/PSL/GRAVISPHERES.pdf
[21] https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_particle
[22] https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1_HrQVhgbeo
[23] https://www.quora.com/q/the-physics-space?ni=0&nsrc=4&snid3=9932125408&tiids=9326955
[24] https://www.quora.com/q/the-physics-space?ni=0&nsrc=4&pmsg=+SHVMN2FUcngyUm9LLUprRVhsblQ6YS5hcHAudmlldy 5wbXNnLkxvZ2dlZEluRnJvbUxpbms6W1s5ODUzNzE0NDhdLCB7fV0*&snid3=10070635475&tiids=9111475
About the author: Robert A. Beatty BE (Minerals) FAusIMM is an Honorary Research Consultant at The University of Queensland in recognition of his work on terrestrial evolution, planet orogeny and climate influences. He has over thirty years’ of broad experience in mine operations and planning for open cut and underground, coal and metalliferous mines. Since 1980 he has operated as Principal of R.A. Beatty and Associates Pty Limited mine consulting engineers offering services under the BOSMIN® trade mark.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print