principiascientificinternational--2020-08-07--Edward Hendrie, Vaccines Cause Autism and Allergies

Vinu Arumugham , in an article written for the Journal of Developing Drugs , reveals a fact that has been hidden from the general public , and it seems also to be hidden from medical practitioners .
“ Nobel Laureate Charles Richet demonstrated over a hundred years ago that injecting a protein into animals or humans causes immune system sensitization to that protein.
” What does that mean for the person receiving the vaccine ?
Arumugham explains that “ [ s ] ubsequent exposure to the protein can result in allergic reactions or anaphylaxis.
” Thus , food proteins injected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have the effect of causing a subsequent allergic reaction by that person who subsequently eats food that contains the food proteins in the vaccine .
That means that vaccines can cause food allergies .
Shockingly , that fact regarding vaccine-induced allergies has been known by the scientific community for more than one hundred years , but the pharmaceutical companies , who largely fund the medical schools , keep physicians , most notably pediatricians , in the dark about it .
Indeed , medical doctors are only given a few hours of instruction on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ill-equipped by their medical training to assess the safety of vaccines .
That ignorance is by design .
Arumugham reveals that this scientific fact of vaccine-induced allergies “ has since been demonstrated over and over again in humans and animal models.
” Vaccines are the source of the explosion in food allergies in the United States .
Indeed , there are more than 15 million Americans who suffer from life-threatening food allergies .
Arumugham reveals how this happens .
Vaccines contain adjuvants such as pertussis toxins and aluminum compounds that also bias towards @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of injected food proteins .
This combination of atopic children and food protein injection along with adjuvants contributes to millions developing life-threatening food allergies .
Vaccines contain food proteins derived from chicken eggs , casein , gelatin , soy , agar , etc .
Those ingredients sound innocent enough .
And if they were eaten they would not be harmful , and indeed would be nutritious .
But when those same ingredients are injected into a human body , in a significant number of cases , they will cause a person to develop @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that food protein .
Polysorbate 80 is also used in vaccines as a surfactant that allows the antigen to evenly dissolve in the excipient vaccine ingredients .
Polysorbate 80 is manufacture from food sources such as coconut , palm , sunflower , tapioca , wheat , corn , etc .
That sounds safe enough , but Arumugham explains that it is impossible to guarantee that these products from which the polysorbate 80 is derived do not contain residual allergen proteins .
Most of what is contained in vaccines fall into the category of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ called excipient ingredients .
The excipient ingredients are the carrier for the active ingredient , which is called the antigen .
The antigen is a killed or weakened virus or bacteria that is supposed to induce the immune response from the body after the vaccine is injected .
The U.S. Center for Disease Control ( CDC ) in a February 2020 publication titled Vaccine Exipient Summary , listed excipient ingredients according to their function into six categories .
The CDC stated : Some excipients are added to a vaccine for a specific purpose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prevent contamination .
For example , thimerosal .
Adjuvants , to help stimulate a stronger immune response .
For example , aluminum salts .
Stabilizers , to keep the vaccine potent during transportation and storage .
For example , sugars or gelatin .
Others are residual trace amounts of materials that were used during the manufacturing process and removed .
These can include : Cell culture materials , used to grow the vaccine antigens .
For example , egg protein , various culture media .
Inactivating ingredients , used to kill viruses or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Antibiotics , used to prevent contamination by bacteria .
For example , neomycin .
Please understand that the CDC does not actually test the vaccines to determine what ingredients are contained in the vaccines .
The CDC simply takes the vaccine manufacturers at their word and republishes the ingredients found in the vaccine package insert .
Notice that thimerosal is listed as a preservative .
Thimerosal ( which contains mercury ) has been identified as an ingredient in childhood vaccines that causes autism in children .
The thimerosal-autism connection has been the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have alleged that thimerosal does not cause autism .
On or about 1999 , the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) determined that mercury in vaccines , in the form of thimerosal , exceeded FDA guidelines for mercury exposure .
The mercury safety standards were determined by measuring methylmercury .
But the mercury in thimerosal metabolizes in the body as ethylmercury .
The FDA had no safety guidelines for ethylmercury .
The FDA did not know what to do so , they correctly required vaccine companies to reduce or eliminate the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the way , the CDC identifies thimerosal as a preservative that is still being used in vaccines .
While thimerosal has been removed from childhood vaccines , according to the CDC , it remains an ingredient in influenza and tetanus and diptheria vaccines .
But since the thimerosal ( and its appended mercury ) has been removed from childhood vaccines , the acceleration in autism has continued .
It seems that the acceleration in autism is correlated to the bombardment of young children with more than 23 CDC recommended vaccinations before the child @ @ @ @ @ @ @ study involving 666 children that compared 405 vaccinated children with 261 unvaccinated children revealed that vaccinated children had 4.7 times greater diagnoses of autism .
That study raised a furor among the powerful pharmaceutical companies and allied interests .
They took immediate action to force the Frontiers in Public Health Journal to retract publication of the study .
It was republished in the Journal of Translational Science but similar pressure was brought on that journal and it subsequently also retracted publication of the study .
It is interesting to note that those who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the study .
They limit their discussion to general allegations of bias , with no specifics .
Indeed , they can not allow the information in the study to be generally known .
The study can be downloaded from the link provided below .
See also the study by Dr. Andrew Wakefield that linked vaccines to autism that was retracted by the Lancet .
You will never hear of a study that alleges that there is no connection between vaccination and autism suddenly withdrawn from publication .
Indeed , when you look @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their study to only the MMR vaccine .
Often they are comparing groups where the unvaccinated group has actually received other vaccines , it is just that they did not receive the MMR vaccine .
And so the results are announced that the study shows that the MMR vaccine does not cause autism because the rates of autism are the same as for the non-MMR group .
For example , in the largest study of its kind , researchers in Denmark compared a group of 625,842 vaccinated children with 31,619 unvaccinated children .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ not received the MMR vaccination .
Whereas the vaccinated children had received the MMR vaccination .
They concluded that the MMR vaccine did not cause any appreciable difference in the rate of autism between the groups .
That is how it was portrayed to the public .
But let us look at that study a little closer .
The problem is that the unvaccinated group was not truly unvaccinated .
26,890 of the 31,619 children in the “ unvaccinated ” group received other vaccinations .
Thus , more than 85 % of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ received vaccinations .
They all received the diptheria , acellular pertussis , tetanus , inactivated poliovirus , and Haemophilus influenza type b vaccines .
Any one of those vaccines could cause an increase in autism in the mislabelled “ unvaccinated ” group .
And certainly , the cumulative effect of those seriatim vaccinations on a young child could be devastating to a young child ’ s undeveloped immune system .
The only vaccine missed by the unvaccinated group was the MMR vaccine .
That fact was not revealed to the general public in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the study and uncover the obscure table buried in it that reveals the truth that the study was a sham .
The study strongly supports that MMR vaccination does not increase the risk for autism , does not trigger autism in susceptible children , and is not associated with clustering of autism cases after vaccination .
That conclusion in the Denmark study can be likened to a study of the intoxicating properties of rum .
In the rum study , we will have a person consume a shot of vodka , a shot @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a shot of tequila , and a shot of rum and another person consume all of those shots but not the shot of rum .
Both persons end up drunk and so we can then announce that because both persons got drunk , rum is not an intoxicating liquor .
Those are the kinds of shenanigans being pulled by “ scientists ” portraying dangerous vaccines as safe to the public .
And so the non-MMR group , being not truly an unvaccinated group , is presenting a higher autism number than would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ group .
When looking at a study that truly compares a vaccinated group vs. an unvaccinated group the results are significant .
The recent study cited above that compared truly unvaccinated children with vaccinated children revealed that vaccinated children had 4.7 times greater diagnoses of autism .
There are synergistic effects of the vaccine ingredients .
Vaccines contain adjuvants that are designed to stimulate the immune response to the antigen in the vaccine .
A common adjuvant is aluminum .
Indeed , the CDC lists aluminum , aluminum hydroxide , aluminum phosphate , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as ingredients in 27 vaccines , including some childhood vaccines .
Aluminum is a dangerous neurotoxin and carcinogen .
Research has established that “ [ t ] he adverse neurologic , hematopoietic , skeletal , respiratory , immunologic , and other effects associated with excessive aluminum ( Al ) exposures are well known.
” Research has proven that the neurological effects of aluminum include “ impairment on neurobehavioral tests for psychomotor and cognitive performance and an increased incidence of subjective neurological symptoms.
” Indeed , “ studies clearly identify the nervous system as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” In studies involving “ intramuscular administration of aluminum hydroxide or aluminum phosphate vaccine adjuvants in rabbits , increased levels of aluminum were found in the kidney , spleen , liver , heart , lymph nodes , and brain ( in decreasing order of aluminum concentration ) .
” The aluminum is put in the vaccine to act as an adjuvant , which stimulates the immune response from the body .
When the aluminum is injected along with the food proteins , it not only increases the immunogenicity ( immune response ) to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the immune response to the food proteins in the vaccine .
A vaccine is designed only to have the body ’ s immune system respond to the antigen and not the other ingredients that make up the excipient in the vaccine .
But that is not what happens .
Instead , there is a concomitant immune response to the food protein in the excipient .
The food protein is supposed to be an inactive ingredient , but it suddenly becomes an active ingredient when the adjuvant stimulates that immune response in the body @ @ @ @ @ @ @ protein as an invader that invites a response from the immune system .
This is manifested in an allergic response when the food protein is later eaten by the vaccinated person .
Not all allergies rise to the level of anaphylaxis .
Most allergic reactions fall into the category of sensitization .
But the bottom line is that the epidemic of food and other allergies , whether anaphylaxis or sensitization , is being caused by vaccines .
It is not simply conjecture that vaccines cause allergies .
In one study comparing vaccinated children @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that vaccinated children were significantly more likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with allergies .
Arumugham discovered that “ there are no specifications limiting allergen content in vaccines approved for use in the United States.
” What does that mean for vaccine patients ?
It means that no safe level has been established for any allergens contained in vaccines .
Those who make vaccine excipients such as sorbitol and Polysorbate 80 are not limited in any way by government regulations as to the residual allergens contained in their injectable grade products @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ [ s ] ince there are no limits , suppliers do not test for allergens in production .
Further , residual allergens that may be present in the excipients are not even listed in the vaccine package inserts.
” Thus , there is no way for a doctor to know all of the excipient ingredients that are in the vaccine that is being injected into his patient .
The doctor ( and the patient ) are literally flying blind .
Each new vaccine injection poses a risk of the patient developing food @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the dangers of vaccines visit : PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Edward Hendrie, Vaccines Cause Autism and Allergies
Written by Edward Hendrie
Vinu Arumugham, in an article written for the Journal of Developing Drugs, reveals a fact that has been hidden from the general public, and it seems also to be hidden from medical practitioners. “Nobel Laureate Charles Richet demonstrated over a hundred years ago that injecting a protein into animals or humans causes immune system sensitization to that protein.”
What does that mean for the person receiving the vaccine? Arumugham explains that “[s]ubsequent exposure to the protein can result in allergic reactions or anaphylaxis.” Thus, food proteins injected into a person through a vaccine can have the effect of causing a subsequent allergic reaction by that person who subsequently eats food that contains the food proteins in the vaccine. That means that vaccines can cause food allergies.
Shockingly, that fact regarding vaccine-induced allergies has been known by the scientific community for more than one hundred years, but the pharmaceutical companies, who largely fund the medical schools, keep physicians, most notably pediatricians, in the dark about it. Indeed, medical doctors are only given a few hours of instruction on vaccines during medical school. Physicians are ill-equipped by their medical training to assess the safety of vaccines. That ignorance is by design.
Arumugham reveals that this scientific fact of vaccine-induced allergies “has since been demonstrated over and over again in humans and animal models.”
Vaccines are the source of the explosion in food allergies in the United States. Indeed, there are more than 15 million Americans who suffer from life-threatening food allergies. Arumugham reveals how this happens.
Vaccines contain adjuvants such as pertussis toxins and aluminum compounds that also bias towards allergy. Adjuvants also increase the immunogenicity of injected food proteins. This combination of atopic children and food protein injection along with adjuvants contributes to millions developing life-threatening food allergies.
Vaccines contain food proteins derived from chicken eggs, casein, gelatin, soy, agar, etc. Those ingredients sound innocent enough. And if they were eaten they would not be harmful, and indeed would be nutritious. But when those same ingredients are injected into a human body, in a significant number of cases, they will cause a person to develop an allergic reaction or even anaphylaxis to that food protein.
Polysorbate 80 is also used in vaccines as a surfactant that allows the antigen to evenly dissolve in the excipient vaccine ingredients. Polysorbate 80 is manufacture from food sources such as coconut, palm, sunflower, tapioca, wheat, corn, etc. That sounds safe enough, but Arumugham explains that it is impossible to guarantee that these products from which the polysorbate 80 is derived do not contain residual allergen proteins.
Most of what is contained in vaccines fall into the category of inactive ingredients. These inactive ingredients are called excipient ingredients. The excipient ingredients are the carrier for the active ingredient, which is called the antigen. The antigen is a killed or weakened virus or bacteria that is supposed to induce the immune response from the body after the vaccine is injected. The U.S. Center for Disease Control (CDC) in a February 2020 publication titled Vaccine Exipient Summary, listed excipient ingredients according to their function into six categories. The CDC stated:
Some excipients are added to a vaccine for a specific purpose. These include:
Preservatives, to prevent contamination. For example, thimerosal.
Adjuvants, to help stimulate a stronger immune response. For example, aluminum salts.
Stabilizers, to keep the vaccine potent during transportation and storage. For example, sugars or gelatin.
Others are residual trace amounts of materials that were used during the manufacturing process and removed. These can include:
Cell culture materials, used to grow the vaccine antigens. For example, egg protein, various culture media.
Inactivating ingredients, used to kill viruses or inactivate toxins. For example, formaldehyde.
Antibiotics, used to prevent contamination by bacteria. For example, neomycin.
Please understand that the CDC does not actually test the vaccines to determine what ingredients are contained in the vaccines. The CDC simply takes the vaccine manufacturers at their word and republishes the ingredients found in the vaccine package insert.
Notice that thimerosal is listed as a preservative. Thimerosal (which contains mercury) has been identified as an ingredient in childhood vaccines that causes autism in children. The thimerosal-autism connection has been the focus of controversy. Some scientific studies have alleged that thimerosal does not cause autism.
On or about 1999, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) determined that mercury in vaccines, in the form of thimerosal, exceeded FDA guidelines for mercury exposure. The mercury safety standards were determined by measuring methylmercury. But the mercury in thimerosal metabolizes in the body as ethylmercury. The FDA had no safety guidelines for ethylmercury. The FDA did not know what to do so, they correctly required vaccine companies to reduce or eliminate the use of thimerosal in vaccines.
By the way, the CDC identifies thimerosal as a preservative that is still being used in vaccines. While thimerosal has been removed from childhood vaccines, according to the CDC, it remains an ingredient in influenza and tetanus and diptheria vaccines.
But since the thimerosal (and its appended mercury) has been removed from childhood vaccines, the acceleration in autism has continued. It seems that the acceleration in autism is correlated to the bombardment of young children with more than 23 CDC recommended vaccinations before the child reaches 15 months old.
A recent study involving 666 children that compared 405 vaccinated children with 261 unvaccinated children revealed that vaccinated children had 4.7 times greater diagnoses of autism.
That study raised a furor among the powerful pharmaceutical companies and allied interests. They took immediate action to force the Frontiers in Public Health Journal to retract publication of the study. It was republished in the Journal of Translational Science but similar pressure was brought on that journal and it subsequently also retracted publication of the study. It is interesting to note that those who denigrate that study never discuss the details of the study. They limit their discussion to general allegations of bias, with no specifics. Indeed, they cannot allow the information in the study to be generally known. The study can be downloaded from the link provided below. See also the study by Dr. Andrew Wakefield that linked vaccines to autism that was retracted by the Lancet.
You will never hear of a study that alleges that there is no connection between vaccination and autism suddenly withdrawn from publication. Indeed, when you look at the studies closely they studiously limit their study to only the MMR vaccine. Often they are comparing groups where the unvaccinated group has actually received other vaccines, it is just that they did not receive the MMR vaccine. And so the results are announced that the study shows that the MMR vaccine does not cause autism because the rates of autism are the same as for the non-MMR group.
For example, in the largest study of its kind, researchers in Denmark compared a group of 625,842 vaccinated children with 31,619 unvaccinated children. The unvaccinated children were those that had not received the MMR vaccination. Whereas the vaccinated children had received the MMR vaccination. They concluded that the MMR vaccine did not cause any appreciable difference in the rate of autism between the groups. That is how it was portrayed to the public. But let us look at that study a little closer.
The problem is that the unvaccinated group was not truly unvaccinated. 26,890 of the 31,619 children in the “unvaccinated” group received other vaccinations. Thus, more than 85% of the children that were labeled as unvaccinated actually received vaccinations. They all received the diptheria, acellular pertussis, tetanus, inactivated poliovirus, and Haemophilus influenza type b vaccines. Any one of those vaccines could cause an increase in autism in the mislabelled “unvaccinated” group. And certainly, the cumulative effect of those seriatim vaccinations on a young child could be devastating to a young child’s undeveloped immune system. The only vaccine missed by the unvaccinated group was the MMR vaccine. That fact was not revealed to the general public in the press releases. One must read the study and uncover the obscure table buried in it that reveals the truth that the study was a sham.
Table of Population Characteristics in the Denmark MMR Vaccine Study
The Denmark study authors concluded:
The study strongly supports that MMR vaccination does not increase the risk for autism, does not trigger autism in susceptible children, and is not associated with clustering of autism cases after vaccination.
That conclusion in the Denmark study can be likened to a study of the intoxicating properties of rum. In the rum study, we will have a person consume a shot of vodka, a shot of whiskey, a shot of gin, a shot of tequila, and a shot of rum and another person consume all of those shots but not the shot of rum. Both persons end up drunk and so we can then announce that because both persons got drunk, rum is not an intoxicating liquor. Those are the kinds of shenanigans being pulled by “scientists” portraying dangerous vaccines as safe to the public.
And so the non-MMR group, being not truly an unvaccinated group, is presenting a higher autism number than would be the case for a truly unvaccinated group. When looking at a study that truly compares a vaccinated group vs. an unvaccinated group the results are significant. The recent study cited above that compared truly unvaccinated children with vaccinated children revealed that vaccinated children had 4.7 times greater diagnoses of autism.
There are synergistic effects of the vaccine ingredients. Vaccines contain adjuvants that are designed to stimulate the immune response to the antigen in the vaccine. A common adjuvant is aluminum.
Indeed, the CDC lists aluminum, aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, aluminum sulfate, or aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate as ingredients in 27 vaccines, including some childhood vaccines.
Aluminum is a dangerous neurotoxin and carcinogen. Research has established that “[t]he adverse neurologic, hematopoietic, skeletal, respiratory, immunologic, and other effects associated with excessive aluminum (Al) exposures are well known.”
Research has proven that the neurological effects of aluminum include “impairment on neurobehavioral tests for psychomotor and cognitive performance and an increased incidence of subjective neurological symptoms.”
Indeed, “studies clearly identify the nervous system as the most sensitive target of aluminum toxicity.”
In studies involving “intramuscular administration of aluminum hydroxide or aluminum phosphate vaccine adjuvants in rabbits, increased levels of aluminum were found in the kidney, spleen, liver, heart, lymph nodes, and brain (in decreasing order of aluminum concentration).”
The aluminum is put in the vaccine to act as an adjuvant, which stimulates the immune response from the body. When the aluminum is injected along with the food proteins, it not only increases the immunogenicity (immune response) to the antigen, but it also increases the immune response to the food proteins in the vaccine.
A vaccine is designed only to have the body’s immune system respond to the antigen and not the other ingredients that make up the excipient in the vaccine. But that is not what happens. Instead, there is a concomitant immune response to the food protein in the excipient. The food protein is supposed to be an inactive ingredient, but it suddenly becomes an active ingredient when the adjuvant stimulates that immune response in the body. The body then treats the food protein as an invader that invites a response from the immune system. This is manifested in an allergic response when the food protein is later eaten by the vaccinated person. Not all allergies rise to the level of anaphylaxis. Most allergic reactions fall into the category of sensitization. But the bottom line is that the epidemic of food and other allergies, whether anaphylaxis or sensitization, is being caused by vaccines.
It is not simply conjecture that vaccines cause allergies. In one study comparing vaccinated children with unvaccinated children, it was found that vaccinated children were significantly more likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with allergies.
Arumugham discovered that “there are no specifications limiting allergen content in vaccines approved for use in the United States.” What does that mean for vaccine patients? It means that no safe level has been established for any allergens contained in vaccines. Those who make vaccine excipients such as sorbitol and Polysorbate 80 are not limited in any way by government regulations as to the residual allergens contained in their injectable grade products. Arumugham made the disturbing discovery that “[s]ince there are no limits, suppliers do not test for allergens in production. Further, residual allergens that may be present in the excipients are not even listed in the vaccine package inserts.” Thus, there is no way for a doctor to know all of the excipient ingredients that are in the vaccine that is being injected into his patient. The doctor (and the patient) are literally flying blind. Each new vaccine injection poses a risk of the patient developing food or other allergies.
For more information on the dangers of vaccines visit:
Children’s Medical Safety Research Institute
Age of Autism
Children’s Health Defense
Read more at jamesfetzer.org
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-07--ALMA captures stirred-up planet factory

ALMA captures stirred-up planet factory

Planet-forming environments can be much more complex and chaotic than previously expected .
This is evidenced by a new image of the star RU Lup , made with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array ( ALMA ) .
All planets , including the ones in our Solar System , are born in disks of gas and dust around stars , so-called protoplanetary disks .
Thanks to ALMA we have stunning high-resolution images of many of these planet factories , showing dusty disks with multiple rings and gaps that hint at the presence of emerging planets .
The most famous examples of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But disks are not necessarily as neatly arranged as these initial dust observations suggest .
A new ALMA image of RU Lup , a young variable star in the Lupus constellation , revealed a giant set of spiral arms made of gas , extending far beyond its more well-known dust disk .
This spiral structure—resembling a ‘ mini-galaxy ’ – extends to nearly 1000 astronomical units ( au ) from the star , much farther away than the compact dust disk that extends to about 60 au .
Previous observations of RU @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Disk Substructures at High Angular Resolution Project ( DSHARP ) , already revealed signs of ongoing planet formation , hinted by the dust gaps in its protoplanetary disk .
“ But we also noticed some faint carbon monoxide ( CO ) gas structures that extended beyond the disk .
That ’ s why we decided to observe the disk around the star again , this time focusing on the gas instead of the dust , ” said Jane Huang of the Center for Astrophysics , Harvard & Smithsonian ( CfA ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ today in the Astrophysical Journal .
Protoplanetary disks contain much more gas than dust .
While dust is needed to accumulate the cores of planets , gas creates their atmospheres .
In recent years , high resolution observations of dust structures have revolutionized our understanding of planet formation .
However , this new image of the gas indicates that the current view of planet formation is still too simplistic and that it might be much more chaotic than previously inferred from the well-known images of neatly concentric ringed disks “ The fact that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gas after a longer observation suggests that we have likely not seen the full diversity and complexity of planet-forming environments .
We may have missed much of the gas structures in other disks , ” added Huang .
Huang and her team suggest several scenarios that could possibly explain why the spiral arms appeared around RU Lup .
Maybe the disk is collapsing under its own gravity , because it is so massive .
Or maybe RU Lup is interacting with another star .
Another possibility is that the disk is interacting with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the spiral arms .
“ None of these scenarios completely explain what we have observed , ” said team-member Sean Andrews of CfA .
“ There might be unknown processes happening during planet formation that we have not yet accounted for in our models .
We will only learn what they are if we find other disks out there that look like RU Lup .
”

ALMA captures stirred-up planet factory
Written by National Radio Astronomy Observatory
Planet-forming environments can be much more complex and chaotic than previously expected. This is evidenced by a new image of the star RU Lup, made with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA).
All planets, including the ones in our Solar System, are born in disks of gas and dust around stars, so-called protoplanetary disks.
Thanks to ALMA we have stunning high-resolution images of many of these planet factories, showing dusty disks with multiple rings and gaps that hint at the presence of emerging planets. The most famous examples of these are HL Tau and TW Hydrae.
But disks are not necessarily as neatly arranged as these initial dust observations suggest. A new ALMA image of RU Lup, a young variable star in the Lupus constellation, revealed a giant set of spiral arms made of gas, extending far beyond its more well-known dust disk. This spiral structure—resembling a ‘mini-galaxy’ – extends to nearly 1000 astronomical units (au) from the star, much farther away than the compact dust disk that extends to about 60 au.
Previous observations of RU Lup with ALMA, which were part of the Disk Substructures at High Angular Resolution Project (DSHARP), already revealed signs of ongoing planet formation, hinted by the dust gaps in its protoplanetary disk. “But we also noticed some faint carbon monoxide (CO) gas structures that extended beyond the disk. That’s why we decided to observe the disk around the star again, this time focusing on the gas instead of the dust,” said Jane Huang of the Center for Astrophysics, Harvard & Smithsonian (CfA) and lead author on a paper published today in the Astrophysical Journal.
ALMA image of the planet-forming disk around the young star RU Lup. The inset image (lower left, red disk) shows a previous (DSHARP) observation of the dust disk with rings and gaps that hint at the presence of forming planets. The new observation shows a large spiral structure (in blue), made out of gas, that spans far beyond the compact dust disk. Credit: ALMA (ESO/NAOJ/NRAO), J. Huang and S. Andrews; NRAO/AUI/NSF, S. Dagnello
Protoplanetary disks contain much more gas than dust. While dust is needed to accumulate the cores of planets, gas creates their atmospheres.
In recent years, high resolution observations of dust structures have revolutionized our understanding of planet formation. However, this new image of the gas indicates that the current view of planet formation is still too simplistic and that it might be much more chaotic than previously inferred from the well-known images of neatly concentric ringed disks
“The fact that we observed this spiral structure in the gas after a longer observation suggests that we have likely not seen the full diversity and complexity of planet-forming environments. We may have missed much of the gas structures in other disks,” added Huang.
Huang and her team suggest several scenarios that could possibly explain why the spiral arms appeared around RU Lup. Maybe the disk is collapsing under its own gravity, because it is so massive. Or maybe RU Lup is interacting with another star. Another possibility is that the disk is interacting with its environment, accreting interstellar material along the spiral arms.
“None of these scenarios completely explain what we have observed,” said team-member Sean Andrews of CfA. “There might be unknown processes happening during planet formation that we have not yet accounted for in our models. We will only learn what they are if we find other disks out there that look like RU Lup.”
Explore further ALMA pinpoints the formation site of planet around nearest young star
More information: Jane Huang et al, Large-scale CO Spiral Arms and Complex Kinematics Associated with the T Tauri Star RU Lup, The Astrophysical Journal (2020). Journal information: Astrophysical Journal **** PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method. Jane Huang et al, Large-scale CO Spiral Arms and Complex Kinematics Associated with the T Tauri Star RU Lup,(2020). DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba1e1
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-07--Ancient Mars may have been covered in ice sheets

Ancient Mars may have been covered in ice sheets Early may not have been quite the warm , wet paradise scientists have hoped for — not if the valleys scarring its surface work the same way as their counterparts here on Earth do .
That ’ s the conclusion of new research that tried to suss out what the Red Planet really looked like during its first billion years by analyzing more than 10,000 segments of .
In particular , the scientists were inspired by the look of Devon Island in the Canadian Arctic , which is dry and frigid @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some Martian valleys may have been formed by a similar process to those lurking below Devon Island ’ s ice .
“ If you look at Earth from a satellite , you see a lot of valleys : some of them made by rivers , some made by glaciers , some made by other processes , and each type has a distinctive shape , ” Anna Grau Galofre , lead author of the new research and a geophysicist at Arizona State University , released by the University of British Columbia , where she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ similar , in that valleys look very different from each other , suggesting that many processes were at play to carve them.
” And one of those processes , the researchers say , could be meltwater flowing between an and the ground below it .
That sort of erosion produces a different valley pattern than one generated by a free-flowing river , according to the scientists , and many of the Martian valleys they studied seem to be a better match for that ice sheet formation model .
Grau Galofre and her colleagues @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter , which flew on NASA ’ s spacecraft and studied the Red Planet between 1997 and 2001 .
The scientists developed a program that incorporated six different characteristics about each of more than 10,000 valley segments , then compared each cluster with attributes based on four different formation scenarios .
According to that analysis , 22 of the 66 networks evaluated best match the patterns formed by meltwater running under a glacier , the researchers concluded .
Another nine best match patterns formed by glaciers themselves , whereas 14 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Most of the rest weren ’ t distinct enough matches for a specific formation scenario .
The researchers also found that the valleys that looked like they were formed by meltwater running beneath glaciers were spread across Mars , while those that looked to have been formed by rivers were concentrated around Arabia Terra , a particularly old region of Mars , .
Rivers and the melted water slipping below a glacier imply one key difference about their surroundings : temperature .
The scientists argue that their new research matches well with recent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other hypotheses have suggested .
“ For the last 40 years , since Mars ’ s valleys were first discovered , the assumption was that rivers once flowed on Mars , eroding and originating all of these valleys , ” Grau Galofre said .
“ We tried to put everything together and bring up a hypothesis that hadn ’ t really been considered.
” The research is described in published Monday ( Aug. 3 ) in the journal Nature Geoscience .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Ancient Mars may have been covered in ice sheets
Written by Meghan Bartels
Early Mars may not have been quite the warm, wet paradise scientists have hoped for — not if the valleys scarring its surface work the same way as their counterparts here on Earth do.
That’s the conclusion of new research that tried to suss out what the Red Planet really looked like during its first billion years by analyzing more than 10,000 segments of valleys on Mars .
In particular, the scientists were inspired by the look of Devon Island in the Canadian Arctic, which is dry and frigid. According to the new analysis, some Martian valleys may have been formed by a similar process to those lurking below Devon Island’s ice.
“If you look at Earth from a satellite, you see a lot of valleys: some of them made by rivers, some made by glaciers, some made by other processes, and each type has a distinctive shape,” Anna Grau Galofre, lead author of the new research and a geophysicist at Arizona State University, said in a statement released by the University of British Columbia, where she did the research. “Mars is similar, in that valleys look very different from each other, suggesting that many processes were at play to carve them.”
And one of those processes, the researchers say, could be meltwater flowing between an ice sheet and the ground below it. That sort of erosion produces a different valley pattern than one generated by a free-flowing river, according to the scientists, and many of the Martian valleys they studied seem to be a better match for that ice sheet formation model.
Grau Galofre and her colleagues started with detailed maps produced by the Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter, which flew on NASA’s Mars Global Surveyor spacecraft and studied the Red Planet between 1997 and 2001. The scientists developed a program that incorporated six different characteristics about each of more than 10,000 valley segments, then compared each cluster with attributes based on four different formation scenarios.
Here, Mars’ Maumee valleys (top half) are superimposed with channels on Devon Island in the Canadian Arctic (bottom half). The shape of the channels and the overall network are almost identical. (Image credit: Anna Grau Galofre)
According to that analysis, 22 of the 66 networks evaluated best match the patterns formed by meltwater running under a glacier, the researchers concluded. Another nine best match patterns formed by glaciers themselves, whereas 14 best match patterns formed by rivers. Most of the rest weren’t distinct enough matches for a specific formation scenario.
The researchers also found that the valleys that looked like they were formed by meltwater running beneath glaciers were spread across Mars, while those that looked to have been formed by rivers were concentrated around Arabia Terra, a particularly old region of Mars, according to NASA .
Rivers and the melted water slipping below a glacier imply one key difference about their surroundings: temperature. The scientists argue that their new research matches well with recent theories that Mars may have been cooler in its distant past than other hypotheses have suggested.
“For the last 40 years, since Mars’s valleys were first discovered, the assumption was that rivers once flowed on Mars, eroding and originating all of these valleys,” Grau Galofre said. “We tried to put everything together and bring up a hypothesis that hadn’t really been considered.”
The research is described in an article published Monday (Aug. 3) in the journal Nature Geoscience.
Read more at www.livescience.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-07--The High Costs And Low Benefits Of Electric Cars

The High Costs And Low Benefits Of Electric Cars The rush to decarbonize every nation in the world in one or maybe two decades reflects the “ I want it all NOW !
” philosophy imbued through modern education systems .
Current and recent former students – and their teachers – demand a perfect world ( since they can envision one ) and exhibit zero patience ( hence the nationwide riots in the U.S. ) .
Hopefully , the mad stampede to destroy the West ’ s ability to use fossil fuels at all will be sidelined by harsh realities @ @ @ @ @ @ @ availability ( including a hoped-for reticence to rely on child slave labor to satisfy their blood lust ) .
Yet the United Kingdom , formerly a bastion of sanity , has mandated , as part of its drive toward an all-electric society , the installation of electric vehicle charging stations in every home by 2030 and that all new cars and vans be hydrogen or electric vehicles ( and not hybrids ) .
Let ’ s start with the use of child labor in the intensive effort just to obtain raw materials for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ As international energy economist Tilak Doshi reports , the most important component in the EV , the lithium-ion rechargeable battery , relies on critical mineral commodities such as cobalt , graphite , lithium , and manganese .
According to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development , two-thirds of the global output of cobalt comes from the Democratic Republic of Congo , a quarter of which from dangerous small-scale ( artisanal ) mines that employ child labor .
Moreover , a recent Global Warming Policy Foundation report by Michael Kelly found that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fleet of petrol-powered vehicles with electric vehicles ( as has been mandated ) will require nearly twice the annual global production of cobalt , three-quarters of the world ’ s production of lithium carbonate , nearly the entire world ’ s production of neodymium , and more than half the world ’ s production of copper .
Replacing every internal combustion engine in the U.S. would take likely five or six times as much of these costly ores .
Add in the rest of Europe ( including Russia ) and the Americas – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ India , and the rest of Asia , you begin to realize that the world can not find , much less permit and extract , enough of these minerals to build a worldwide EV fleet by 2040 ( let alone sooner ) .
It takes almost that much time these days just to get a permit to start up a new mining operation – if you can get past the environmental and NIMBY objections .
And , as Kelly concludes , The environmental and social impacts of vastly expanded mining for these materials @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when mined , transported , and processed – in countries afflicted by corruption and poor human rights records can only be imagined .
Okay , so maybe you are fine with accelerated permitting ( no environmental impact statements or public comment periods ) to dig up or even import ore from Mars or the Moon .
Whether children or AI robots do the work , in either case by slaves .
The next hurdle is overcoming the shock of learning that you are not doing that much for the environment by imposing electric @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that about half the lifetime CO2 emissions from an electric vehicle come from the energy used to produce the car – largely the mining and processing of raw materials needed for the battery .
Only about 17 percent of lifetime CO2 emissions from gasoline-powered vehicles are attributed to their manufacture .
Moreover , manufacturing an EV expends about 30,000 pounds of CO2 , while manufacturing a gasoline vehicle expends only about 14,000 pounds of CO2 .
Doshi explains that the on-road CO2 emissions of EVs depend on the power generation fuel used to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coal power plant , it amounts to about 15 ounces of CO2 for every mile driven – 3 ounces MORE than from a similar gasoline-powered car .
If an EV is only driven about 50,000 miles over its lifetime , it will put more CO2 into the atmosphere than a comparable gasoline vehicle .
Yet over 90,000 miles with the battery charged by cleaner natural-gas power plants , the EV will generate just 24 percent less CO2 than its gasoline-powered twin .
A 2012 peer-reviewed Yale University study had found that electric vehicles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decrease in “ global warming potential , ” yet they also exhibit the potential for significant increases in human toxicity , freshwater eco-toxicity , freshwater eutrophication , and metal depletion impacts .
The study concluded that with a vehicle lifetime of 100,000 kilometers ( about 62,000 miles ) , the global warming potential of EVs is no more than 14 percent with respect to gasoline vehicles and indistinguishable in impacts compared to diesel vehicles .
And you thought “ zero-emissions vehicle ” ACTUALLY meant zero emissions .
But in the UK , at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The wise owls of London are just as eager to phase out natural gas to operate home appliances ( including heating systems ) .
Yet , retired engineer Mike Travers argues that decarbonizing the UK economy will likely require homeowners ( and landlords ) to install electric heat pumps , EV charging points , and electric stoves and showers .
This extra demand will require the installation of larger breaker boxes , along with new circuit breakers and distribution boards – plus rewiring between the breaker box and the distribution network .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ cabling is underground , trenches will have to be dug between the home and the feeder circuits in the street .
All of this will vastly increase electricity costs .
The same goes for Californians , whose governor just signed a law mandating 100 percent renewable energy by 2045 .
Travers notes that many EV advocates envision “ vehicle to grid ” charging , in which vehicle owners feed electricity back into the grid from their vehicle ’ s battery when demand is high .
Duh !
One problem : The EV battery @ @ @ @ @ @ @ requires alternating current .
To feed the grid , the homeowner would have to spend a grand on a DC-AC converter , and why would anyone do that – or drain his own vehicle ’ s battery during unstable times ?
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

The High Costs And Low Benefits Of Electric Cars
Written by Duggan Flanakin
The rush to decarbonize every nation in the world in one or maybe two decades reflects the “I want it all NOW!” philosophy imbued through modern education systems.
Current and recent former students – and their teachers – demand a perfect world (since they can envision one) and exhibit zero patience (hence the nationwide riots in the U.S.).
Hopefully, the mad stampede to destroy the West’s ability to use fossil fuels at all will be sidelined by harsh realities of economics, logistics, and resource availability (including a hoped-for reticence to rely on child slave labor to satisfy their blood lust).
Yet the United Kingdom, formerly a bastion of sanity, has mandated, as part of its drive toward an all-electric society, the installation of electric vehicle charging stations in every home by 2030 and that all new cars and vans be hydrogen or electric vehicles (and not hybrids).
Let’s start with the use of child labor in the intensive effort just to obtain raw materials for electric vehicle (EV) batteries.
As international energy economist Tilak Doshi reports, the most important component in the EV, the lithium-ion rechargeable battery, relies on critical mineral commodities such as cobalt, graphite, lithium, and manganese.
According to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, two-thirds of the global output of cobalt comes from the Democratic Republic of Congo, a quarter of which from dangerous small-scale (artisanal) mines that employ child labor.
Moreover, a recent Global Warming Policy Foundation report by Michael Kelly found that replacing just the United Kingdom’s fleet of petrol-powered vehicles with electric vehicles (as has been mandated) will require nearly twice the annual global production of cobalt, three-quarters of the world’s production of lithium carbonate, nearly the entire world’s production of neodymium, and more than half the world’s production of copper.
Replacing every internal combustion engine in the U.S. would take likely five or six times as much of these costly ores.
Add in the rest of Europe (including Russia) and the Americas – and even ignoring Africa, China, India, and the rest of Asia, you begin to realize that the world cannot find, much less permit and extract, enough of these minerals to build a worldwide EV fleet by 2040 (let alone sooner).
It takes almost that much time these days just to get a permit to start up a new mining operation – if you can get past the environmental and NIMBY objections. And, as Kelly concludes,
The environmental and social impacts of vastly expanded mining for these materials — some of which are highly toxic when mined, transported, and processed – in countries afflicted by corruption and poor human rights records can only be imagined.
Okay, so maybe you are fine with accelerated permitting (no environmental impact statements or public comment periods) to dig up or even import ore from Mars or the Moon. Whether children or AI robots do the work, in either case by slaves.
The next hurdle is overcoming the shock of learning that you are not doing that much for the environment by imposing electric vehicles on entire populations.
Doshi reports that about half the lifetime CO2 emissions from an electric vehicle come from the energy used to produce the car – largely the mining and processing of raw materials needed for the battery.
Only about 17 percent of lifetime CO2 emissions from gasoline-powered vehicles are attributed to their manufacture.
Moreover, manufacturing an EV expends about 30,000 pounds of CO2, while manufacturing a gasoline vehicle expends only about 14,000 pounds of CO2.
Doshi explains that the on-road CO2 emissions of EVs depend on the power generation fuel used to recharge its battery.
If from a coal power plant, it amounts to about 15 ounces of CO2 for every mile driven – 3 ounces MORE than from a similar gasoline-powered car.
If an EV is only driven about 50,000 miles over its lifetime, it will put more CO2 into the atmosphere than a comparable gasoline vehicle.
Yet over 90,000 miles with the battery charged by cleaner natural-gas power plants, the EV will generate just 24 percent less CO2 than its gasoline-powered twin.
A 2012 peer-reviewed Yale University study had found that electric vehicles offer only a 10 to 24 percent decrease in “global warming potential,” yet they also exhibit the potential for significant increases in human toxicity, freshwater eco-toxicity, freshwater eutrophication, and metal depletion impacts.
The study concluded that with a vehicle lifetime of 100,000 kilometers (about 62,000 miles), the global warming potential of EVs is no more than 14 percent with respect to gasoline vehicles and indistinguishable in impacts compared to diesel vehicles.
And you thought “zero-emissions vehicle” ACTUALLY meant zero emissions. But in the UK, at least, there is an added problem. The wise owls of London are just as eager to phase out natural gas to operate home appliances (including heating systems).
Yet, retired engineer Mike Travers argues that decarbonizing the UK economy will likely require homeowners (and landlords) to install electric heat pumps, EV charging points, and electric stoves and showers.
This extra demand will require the installation of larger breaker boxes, along with new circuit breakers and distribution boards – plus rewiring between the breaker box and the distribution network.
In urban areas, where most electric cabling is underground, trenches will have to be dug between the home and the feeder circuits in the street.
All of this will vastly increase electricity costs. The same goes for Californians, whose governor just signed a law mandating 100 percent renewable energy by 2045.
But wait! There’s MORE!
Travers notes that many EV advocates envision “vehicle to grid” charging, in which vehicle owners feed electricity back into the grid from their vehicle’s battery when demand is high.
Duh! One problem: The EV battery is direct current, while the grid requires alternating current.
To feed the grid, the homeowner would have to spend a grand on a DC-AC converter, and why would anyone do that – or drain his own vehicle’s battery during unstable times?
Read more at CFACT
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-07--Bill Gates: Climate Change Deaths Will Match COVID In 40 Years

Billionaire Bill Gates wants the United States to treat climate change with the “ same sense of urgency ” with which it has responded to COVID-19 , arguing that the impacts of the former will be much worse without corrective action .
“ If you want to understand the kind of damage that climate change will inflict , look at COVID-19 and spread the pain out over a much longer period of time , ” the Microsoft co-founder wrote on his blog Tuesday .
“ The loss of life and economic misery caused by this pandemic are [ sic ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if we do not eliminate the world ’ s carbon emissions.
” Gates estimated that the death toll from climate change would match that of the pandemic by 2060 , and exceed it fivefold by 2100 .
The economic impact of climate change over the next two decades , he added , could be “ as bad as having a COVID-sized pandemic every ten years.
” Early in the pandemic , some drew comparisons between the virus and climate change , and credited economic shutdowns with reducing carbon emissions .
Gates acknowledged this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t nearly enough to address rising emissions .
“ What ’ s remarkable is not how much emissions will go down because of the pandemic , but how little , ” he said , pointing to a July report estimating the cost of emissions reductions .
“ Has closing off major parts of the economy avoided emissions at anything close to $ 100 per ton ?
” Gates asked .
“ No .
In the United States , according to data from the Rhodium Group , it comes to between $ 3,200 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the European Union , it ’ s roughly the same amount .
In other words , the shutdown is reducing emissions at a cost between 32 and 54 times the $ 100 per ton that economists consider a reasonable price.
” At the end of his blog post , Gates called for drastic change and noted that flying or driving less wasn ’ t going to cut it .
“ So just as we need new tests , treatments , and vaccines for the novel coronavirus , we need new tools for fighting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ electricity , make things , grow food , keep our buildings cool and warm , and move people and goods around the world , ” he said .
“ And we need new seeds and other innovations to help the world ’ s poorest people — many of whom are smallholder farmers — adapt to a less predictable climate.
” Meanwhile , a Duke University professor told lawmakers Wednesday that the U.S. could prevent 4.5 million premature deaths if it worked towards to keep temperature increases below two degrees Celsius .
Conservatives have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , citing apocalyptic predictions from prior decades .
The cost of implementing large-scale reform , they claim , would be unsustainable and inflict massive losses on the U.S. economy .
The Green New Deal ( GND ) , which Gates did not mention , has become the latest touchstone of the environmental movement in the U.S. and been championed by leading Democrats .
The right-leaning Competitive Enterprise Institute , which is funded by companies in the energy , automotive and technology sectors , recently found that even a portion of the GND ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ $ 75,000 per year .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Bill Gates: Climate Change Deaths Will Match COVID In 40 Years
Written by Sam Dorman
Billionaire Bill Gates wants the United States to treat climate change with the “same sense of urgency” with which it has responded to COVID-19, arguing that the impacts of the former will be much worse without corrective action.
“If you want to understand the kind of damage that climate change will inflict, look at COVID-19 and spread the pain out over a much longer period of time,” the Microsoft co-founder wrote on his blog Tuesday.
“The loss of life and economic misery caused by this pandemic are [sic] on par with what will happen regularly if we do not eliminate the world’s carbon emissions.”
Gates estimated that the death toll from climate change would match that of the pandemic by 2060, and exceed it fivefold by 2100.
The economic impact of climate change over the next two decades, he added, could be “as bad as having a COVID-sized pandemic every ten years.”
Early in the pandemic, some drew comparisons between the virus and climate change, and credited economic shutdowns with reducing carbon emissions.
Gates acknowledged this effect but said such temporary restrictions aren’t nearly enough to address rising emissions.
“What’s remarkable is not how much emissions will go down because of the pandemic, but how little,” he said, pointing to a July report estimating the cost of emissions reductions.
“Has closing off major parts of the economy avoided emissions at anything close to $100 per ton?” Gates asked.
“No. In the United States, according to data from the Rhodium Group, it comes to between $3,200 and $5,400 per ton. In the European Union, it’s roughly the same amount. In other words, the shutdown is reducing emissions at a cost between 32 and 54 times the $100 per ton that economists consider a reasonable price.”
At the end of his blog post, Gates called for drastic change and noted that flying or driving less wasn’t going to cut it.
“So just as we need new tests, treatments, and vaccines for the novel coronavirus, we need new tools for fighting climate change: zero-carbon ways to produce electricity, make things, grow food, keep our buildings cool and warm, and move people and goods around the world,” he said.
“And we need new seeds and other innovations to help the world’s poorest people — many of whom are smallholder farmers — adapt to a less predictable climate.”
Meanwhile, a Duke University professor told lawmakers Wednesday that the U.S. could prevent 4.5 million premature deaths if it worked towards to keep temperature increases below two degrees Celsius.
Conservatives have generally argued that climate fears are overblown, citing apocalyptic predictions from prior decades.
The cost of implementing large-scale reform, they claim, would be unsustainable and inflict massive losses on the U.S. economy.
The Green New Deal (GND), which Gates did not mention, has become the latest touchstone of the environmental movement in the U.S. and been championed by leading Democrats.
The right-leaning Competitive Enterprise Institute, which is funded by companies in the energy, automotive and technology sectors, recently found that even a portion of the GND’s mandates would cost swing-state households around $75,000 per year.
Read more at Fox News
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-08--World’s Top Epidemiologists – Masks Don’t Work!

Denmark boasts one of the lowest COVID-19 death rates in the world .
As of August 4 , the Danes have suffered 616 COVID-19 deaths , according to figures from Johns Hopkins University .
That ’ s less than one-third of the number of Danes who die from pneumonia or influenza in a given year .
Despite this success , Danish leaders recently found themselves on the defensive .
The reason is that Danes aren ’ t wearing face masks , and local authorities for the most part aren ’ t even recommending them .
This prompted Berlingske , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ complain that Danes had positioned themselves “ to the right of Trump.
” This apparently did not sit well with Danish health officials .
They responded by noting there is little conclusive evidence that face masks are an effective way to limit the spread of respiratory viruses .
Denmark is not alone .
Despite a global stampede of mask-wearing , data show that 80-90 percent of people in Finland and Holland say they “ never ” wear masks when they go out , a sharp contrast to the 80-90 percent of people in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ always ” wear masks when they go out .
Others , echoing statements similar to the US Surgeon General from early March , said masks could make individuals sicker and exacerbate the spread of the virus .
In Sweden , where COVID-19 deaths have slowed to a crawl , public health officials say they see “ no point ” in requiring individuals to wear masks .
What ’ s Going on With Masks ?
The top immunologists and epidemiologists in the world can ’ t decide if masks are helpful in reducing the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ ve seen organizations like the World Health Organization… …and the CDC go back and forth in their recommendations… For the average person , it ’ s confusing and frustrating .
It ’ s also a bit frightening , considering that we ’ ve seen people denounced in public for not wearing a mask while picking up a bag of groceries .
The truth is masks have become the new wedge issue , the latest phase of the culture war .
Mask opponents tend to see mask wearers as “ fraidy cats ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ignore basic science .
Mask supporters , on the other hand , often see people who refuse to wear masks as selfish Trumpkins … who willfully ignore basic science .
There ’ s not a lot of middle ground to be found and there ’ s no easy way to sit this one out .
We all have to go outside , so at some we all are required to don the mask or not .
It ’ s clear from the data that despite the impression of Americans as selfish rebel cowboys @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to protect others , Americans are wearing masks far more than many people in European countries .
Polls show Americans are wearing masks at record levels , though a political divide remains : 98 percent of Democrats report wearing masks in public compared to 66 percent of Republicans and 85 percent of Independents .
( These numbers , no doubt , are to some extent the product of mask requirements in cities and states . )
Whether one is pro-mask or anti-mask , the fact of the matter is that face coverings have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which stands to only further pollute the science .
Last month , for example , researchers at Minnesota ’ s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy responded to demands they remove an article that found mask requirements were “ not based on sound data.
” The school , to its credit , did not remove the article , but instead opted to address the objections critics of their research had raised .
First , Do No Harm The ethics of medicine go back millennia .
The Hippocratic Oath famously calls on medical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ harm.
” ( Those words didn ’ t actually appear in the original oath ; they developed as a form of shorthand . )
There is a similar principle in the realm of public health : the Principle of Effectiveness .
Public health officials say the idea makes it clear that public health organizations have a responsibility to not harm the people they are assigned to protect .
The problem with mask mandates is that public health officials are not merely recommending a precaution that may or may not be effective .
They @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to a state order that could ultimately make individuals or entire populations sicker , according to world-leading public health officials .
That is not just a violation of the Effectiveness Principle .
It ’ s a violation of a basic personal freedom .
Mask advocates might mean well , but they overlook a basic reality : humans spontaneously alter behavior during pandemics .
Scientific evidence shows that American workplaces and consumers changed the patterns of their travel before lockdown orders were issued .
As I ’ ve previously noted , this should come @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , instinctive , and self-preserving mammals who generally seek to avoid high-risk behavior .
The natural law of spontaneous order shows that people naturally take actions of self-protection by constantly analyzing risk .
Instead of ordering people to “ mask-up ” under penalty of fines or jail time , scientists and public health officials should get back to playing their most important role : developing sound research on which people can freely make informed decisions .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

World’s Top Epidemiologists – Masks Don’t Work!
Written by John Miltimore
Denmark boasts one of the lowest COVID-19 death rates in the world. As of August 4, the Danes have suffered 616 COVID-19 deaths, according to figures from Johns Hopkins University.
That’s less than one-third of the number of Danes who die from pneumonia or influenza in a given year.
Despite this success, Danish leaders recently found themselves on the defensive. The reason is that Danes aren’t wearing face masks, and local authorities for the most part aren’t even recommending them.
This prompted Berlingske, the country’s oldest newspaper, to complain that Danes had positioned themselves “to the right of Trump.”
“The whole world is wearing face masks, even Donald Trump,” Berlingske pointed out.
This apparently did not sit well with Danish health officials.
They responded by noting there is little conclusive evidence that face masks are an effective way to limit the spread of respiratory viruses.
“All these countries recommending face masks haven’t made their decisions based on new studies,” said Henning Bundgaard, chief physician at Denmark’s Rigshospitale, according to Bloomberg News.
Denmark is not alone.
Despite a global stampede of mask-wearing, data show that 80-90 percent of people in Finland and Holland say they “never” wear masks when they go out, a sharp contrast to the 80-90 percent of people in Spain and Italy who say they “always” wear masks when they go out.
Dutch public health officials recently explained why they’re not recommending masks.
“From a medical point of view, there is no evidence of a medical effect of wearing face masks, so we decided not to impose a national obligation,” said Medical Care Minister Tamara van Ark.
Others, echoing statements similar to the US Surgeon General from early March, said masks could make individuals sicker and exacerbate the spread of the virus.
“Face masks in public places are not necessary, based on all the current evidence,” said Coen Berends, spokesman for the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. “There is no benefit and there may even be negative impact.”
In Sweden, where COVID-19 deaths have slowed to a crawl, public health officials say they see “no point” in requiring individuals to wear masks.
“With numbers diminishing very quickly in Sweden, we see no point in wearing a face mask in Sweden, not even on public transport,” said Anders Tegnell, Sweden’s top infectious disease expert.
What’s Going on With Masks?
The top immunologists and epidemiologists in the world can’t decide if masks are helpful in reducing the spread of COVID-19. Indeed, we’ve seen organizations like the World Health Organization…
…and the CDC go back and forth in their recommendations…
For the average person, it’s confusing and frustrating. It’s also a bit frightening, considering that we’ve seen people denounced in public for not wearing a mask while picking up a bag of groceries.
The truth is masks have become the new wedge issue, the latest phase of the culture war. Mask opponents tend to see mask wearers as “fraidy cats” or virtue-signalling “sheeple” who willfully ignore basic science. Mask supporters, on the other hand, often see people who refuse to wear masks as selfish Trumpkins … who willfully ignore basic science.
There’s not a lot of middle ground to be found and there’s no easy way to sit this one out. We all have to go outside, so at some we all are required to don the mask or not.
It’s clear from the data that despite the impression of Americans as selfish rebel cowboys who won’t wear a mask to protect others, Americans are wearing masks far more than many people in European countries.
Polls show Americans are wearing masks at record levels, though a political divide remains: 98 percent of Democrats report wearing masks in public compared to 66 percent of Republicans and 85 percent of Independents. (These numbers, no doubt, are to some extent the product of mask requirements in cities and states.)
Whether one is pro-mask or anti-mask, the fact of the matter is that face coverings have become politicized to an unhealthy degree, which stands to only further pollute the science.
Last month, for example, researchers at Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy responded to demands they remove an article that found mask requirements were “not based on sound data.”
The school, to its credit, did not remove the article, but instead opted to address the objections critics of their research had raised.
First, Do No Harm
The ethics of medicine go back millennia.
The Hippocratic Oath famously calls on medical practitioners to “first, do no harm.” (Those words didn’t actually appear in the original oath; they developed as a form of shorthand.) There is a similar principle in the realm of public health: the Principle of Effectiveness.
Public health officials say the idea makes it clear that public health organizations have a responsibility to not harm the people they are assigned to protect.
“If a community is at risk, the government may have a duty to recommend interventions, as long as those interventions will cause no harm, or are the least harmful option,” wrote Claire J. Horwell Professor of Geohealth at Durham University and Fiona McDonald, Co-Director of the Australian Centre for Health Law Research at Queensland University of Technology. “If an agency follows the principle of effectiveness, it will only recommend an intervention that they know to be effective.”
The problem with mask mandates is that public health officials are not merely recommending a precaution that may or may not be effective.
They are using force to make people submit to a state order that could ultimately make individuals or entire populations sicker, according to world-leading public health officials.
That is not just a violation of the Effectiveness Principle. It’s a violation of a basic personal freedom.
Mask advocates might mean well, but they overlook a basic reality: humans spontaneously alter behavior during pandemics. Scientific evidence shows that American workplaces and consumers changed the patterns of their travel before lockdown orders were issued.
As I’ve previously noted, this should come as no surprise: Humans are intelligent, instinctive, and self-preserving mammals who generally seek to avoid high-risk behavior. The natural law of spontaneous order shows that people naturally take actions of self-protection by constantly analyzing risk.
Instead of ordering people to “mask-up” under penalty of fines or jail time, scientists and public health officials should get back to playing their most important role: developing sound research on which people can freely make informed decisions.
Read more at fee.org
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-08--Exposing Dr. Fauci’s Double Standards on Hydroxychloroquine

I don ’ t know if hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) is effective against COVID .
It ’ s disturbing that I , like many other Americans , feel that we won ’ t learn the truth from Dr. Fauci .
A 2005 Virology Journal article by MJ Vincent and CDC ’ s Eric Bergeron et al , surfaced last week .
This conclusion implies that chloroquine functions both as a preventative “ vaccine ” and as a cure for strains of coronavirus .
If these results persist in human models in COVID 19 , as last month ’ s Michigan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doctors and other nations suggest—HCQ might compete with Dr. Fauci ’ s vaccines including the Moderna vaccine for which his agency co-owns the patent and Dr. Fauci has invested $ 500 million in taxpayer dollars .
Worse yet—for vaccine makers—HCQ ’ s patents are long expired ; pills cost 30 cents .
Dr. Fauci insists he will not approve HCQ for COVID until its efficacy is proven in “ randomized , double-blind placebo studies.
” To date , Dr. Fauci has never advocated such studies for any of the 72 vaccine doses added @ @ @ @ @ @ @ took over NIAID in 1984 .
Nor is he requiring them for the COVID vaccines currently racing for approval .
Why should hydroxychloroquine be the only remedy required to cross this high hurdle ?
HCQ is less in need of randomized placebo studies than any of these vaccines since its safety is well established after 60 years of use and decades on WHO ’ s list of “ essential medicines.
” Bill Gates , the World Health Organization and Pharma have fueled public suspicions by funding multiple studies of HCQ using protocols transparently @ @ @ @ @ @ @ condemned HCQ for COVID based on two studies in NEJM and Lancet even after the journals retracted them for fraud .
Dr. Fauci ’ s peculiar hostility towards HCQ is consistent with his half-century bias favoring vaccines and patent medicines .
Dr. Fauci ’ s double standards create confusion , mistrust and polarization .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend @ @ @ @

Exposing Dr. Fauci’s Double Standards on Hydroxychloroquine
Written by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
I don’t know if hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is effective against COVID. It’s disturbing that I, like many other Americans, feel that we won’t learn the truth from Dr. Fauci. A 2005 Virology Journal article by MJ Vincent and CDC’s Eric Bergeron et al, surfaced last week.
The study concludes:
“We report…that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-Coronavirus infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.”
This conclusion implies that chloroquine functions both as a preventative “vaccine” and as a cure for strains of coronavirus.
If these results persist in human models in COVID 19, as last month’s Michigan hospital study and abundant evidence from US doctors and other nations suggest—HCQ might compete with Dr. Fauci’s vaccines including the Moderna vaccine for which his agency co-owns the patent and Dr. Fauci has invested $500 million in taxpayer dollars.
Worse yet—for vaccine makers—HCQ’s patents are long expired; pills cost 30 cents. Dr. Fauci insists he will not approve HCQ for COVID until its efficacy is proven in “randomized, double-blind placebo studies.”
To date, Dr. Fauci has never advocated such studies for any of the 72 vaccine doses added to the mandatory childhood schedule since he took over NIAID in 1984. Nor is he requiring them for the COVID vaccines currently racing for approval.
Why should hydroxychloroquine be the only remedy required to cross this high hurdle? HCQ is less in need of randomized placebo studies than any of these vaccines since its safety is well established after 60 years of use and decades on WHO’s list of “essential medicines.”
Bill Gates, the World Health Organization and Pharma have fueled public suspicions by funding multiple studies of HCQ using protocols transparently calculated to discredit the drug. FDA condemned HCQ for COVID based on two studies in NEJM and Lancet even after the journals retracted them for fraud. Dr. Fauci’s peculiar hostility towards HCQ is consistent with his half-century bias favoring vaccines and patent medicines. Dr. Fauci’s double standards create confusion, mistrust and polarization.
Read more at childrenshealthdefense.org
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-08--Any Studies Claiming HCQ is Ineffective for COVID-19 Are Fake

Any Studies Claiming HCQ is Ineffective for COVID-19 Are Fake If hydroxychloroquine has successfully treated so many coronavirus patients , why do some studies still claim it doesn ’ t work ?
According to Dr. Stella Immanuel of the Rehoboth Medical Center in Houston , Texas , the answer is simple : Those studies are fake science .
Speaking at the White Coat Summit in Washington , D.C. , Immanuel said : The event where she made the remarks was led by America ’ s Frontline Doctors , a group of medical doctors who were addressing a “ massive disinformation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people from getting the treatment and prevention they need .
Dr. Immanuel cured 350 patients with a success rate of 100 percent using a combination of hydroxychloroquine , which has a proven long-term record of safety and effectiveness ; the mineral zinc ; and the broad-spectrum antibiotic Azithromycin .
She said that politicians need to let doctors be doctors and that doctors need to stop being afraid .
In fact , she had strong words for the doctors who are rejecting hydroxychloroquine because they are afraid that the medical establishment will pursue them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ You ’ re like the ‘ good ’ Nazis , the ‘ good ’ Germans , who watched Jews get killed and didn ’ t speak up.
” Dr. Immanuel , who is originally from Nigeria and studied medicine there , is a primary care physician .
She recounted the many successes that she has seen by giving this combination treatment to her patients , including one 92-year-old who recovered from the virus , along with patients with high-risk conditions such as asthma , diabetes and high blood pressure .
She said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coronavirus because we already have a cure .
She also said that she , her staff , and many of her acquaintances who are doctors are also taking hydroxychloroquine for prevention because it also works as a preventative prophylaxis .
None of those she knows who are taking it have gotten sick despite being in direct contact with infected patients on a regular basis .
Of course , Big Tech is doing its best to suppress this information and keep the Big Pharma profit machine going .
The original video of Dr. Immanuel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ taken down by YouTube , Twitter and Facebook .
When Dr. Immanuel calls some studies “ fake science , ” she is not just throwing terms around .
One of the biggest studies that was cited early in the crisis as a reason not to use hydroxychloroquine has since been quietly pulled from The Lancet and three of its authors have apologized , saying they had reservations about the quality and veracity of the study ’ s data .
The data came from a company called Surgisphere , who refused to share of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an independent review could be carried out .
The study , which was an observational one that supposedly looked at 96,000 patients hospitalized with the disease , concluded that those who were given the drug had a higher risk of heart problems and death than those who were not given the drug .
However , a closer investigation of Surgisphere revealed that the company is highly questionable and that the hospitals in Australia that needed to have supplied the Australian patient numbers cited in the study had never even heard of the company @ @ @ @ @ @ @ database .
How many people will have to suffer and die unnecessarily so that the media can continue to make President Trump look bad for supporting the drug and Big Pharma can protect its more profitable ( but far less effective ) drugs and vaccines for coronavirus ?
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Any Studies Claiming HCQ is Ineffective for COVID-19 Are Fake
Written by www.naturalnews.com
If hydroxychloroquine has successfully treated so many coronavirus patients, why do some studies still claim it doesn’t work? According to Dr. Stella Immanuel of the Rehoboth Medical Center in Houston, Texas, the answer is simple: Those studies are fake science.
Speaking at the White Coat Summit in Washington, D.C., Immanuel said:
“Any study that says hydroxychloroquine doesn’t work is fake science. And I want them to show me how it doesn’t work. How is it going to work for 350 patients for me, and they are all alive, and then somebody says it doesn’t work? Guys, all them studies: fake science.”
The event where she made the remarks was led by America’s Frontline Doctors, a group of medical doctors who were addressing a “massive disinformation campaign” about coronavirus that is stopping people from getting the treatment and prevention they need.
Dr. Immanuel cured 350 patients with a success rate of 100 percent using a combination of hydroxychloroquine, which has a proven long-term record of safety and effectiveness; the mineral zinc; and the broad-spectrum antibiotic Azithromycin.
She said that politicians need to let doctors be doctors and that doctors need to stop being afraid. In fact, she had strong words for the doctors who are rejecting hydroxychloroquine because they are afraid that the medical establishment will pursue them for using the treatment, saying: “You’re like the ‘good’ Nazis, the ‘good’ Germans, who watched Jews get killed and didn’t speak up.”
Dr. Immanuel, who is originally from Nigeria and studied medicine there, is a primary care physician. She recounted the many successes that she has seen by giving this combination treatment to her patients, including one 92-year-old who recovered from the virus, along with patients with high-risk conditions such as asthma, diabetes and high blood pressure. She said that no one needs to die from coronavirus because we already have a cure.
She also said that she, her staff, and many of her acquaintances who are doctors are also taking hydroxychloroquine for prevention because it also works as a preventative prophylaxis. None of those she knows who are taking it have gotten sick despite being in direct contact with infected patients on a regular basis.
Of course, Big Tech is doing its best to suppress this information and keep the Big Pharma profit machine going. The original video of Dr. Immanuel’s passionate speech has already been taken down by YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.
Major study claiming HCQ dangers pulled from The Lancet
When Dr. Immanuel calls some studies “fake science,” she is not just throwing terms around. One of the biggest studies that was cited early in the crisis as a reason not to use hydroxychloroquine has since been quietly pulled from The Lancet and three of its authors have apologized, saying they had reservations about the quality and veracity of the study’s data.
The data came from a company called Surgisphere, who refused to share of the data set that they used so an independent review could be carried out. The study, which was an observational one that supposedly looked at 96,000 patients hospitalized with the disease, concluded that those who were given the drug had a higher risk of heart problems and death than those who were not given the drug. However, a closer investigation of Surgisphere revealed that the company is highly questionable and that the hospitals in Australia that needed to have supplied the Australian patient numbers cited in the study had never even heard of the company and didn’t participate in the database.
How many people will have to suffer and die unnecessarily so that the media can continue to make President Trump look bad for supporting the drug and Big Pharma can protect its more profitable (but far less effective) drugs and vaccines for coronavirus?
Read more at www.naturalnews.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print


principiascientificinternational--2020-08-08--WHO Now Admits COVID19 Vaccine May Never Happen

WHO Now Admits COVID19 Vaccine May Never Happen ( Natural News ) For all of the hype surrounding future vaccines for the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) , the World Health Organization ’ s ( WHO ) take on the situation is not at all promising .
During his organization ’ s latest briefing in Geneva , WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom admitted publicly that Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) vaccines will not work , and that a “ cure ” may never be found because there is supposedly “ no silver bullet ” for the plandemic .
Even though @ @ @ @ @ @ @ already in development , Tedros says that none of them are likely to work and that the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) will continue to be a problem pretty much forever .
“ A number of vaccines are now in phase three clinical trials and we all hope to have a number of effective vaccines that can help prevent people from infection , ” Tedros is quoted as saying .
“ However , there ’ s no silver bullet at the moment and there might never be.
” In other words , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enriching pharmaceutical CEOs and other top Big Pharma executives with taxpayer cash , which is precisely what President Donald Trump ’ s “ Operation Warp Speed ” program is all about .
Tedros ’ advice is simply to “ do it all , ” meaning get vaccinated , stay home , wear your mask all day long every day , and avoid coming into contact with other people .
This , he says , is the permanent solution to the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) .
“ The message to people and governments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Tedros stated , throwing out buzzwords like testing , isolation , contact tracing , quarantining , distancing , washing hands repeatedly , etcetera .
If we let them , the globalists will drag the plandemic on and on FOREVER Tedros went on to explain that governments everywhere need to “ keep strengthening the health system , ” though he made absolutely no mention about people strengthening their own immune systems , which is never , ever part of the official conversation concerning health during any crisis , including this one .
Tedros @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people , more contact tracing of people , and eventually full tracking and jabbing of all people with chip-laced vaccines that will help the globalists monitor and control the human “ herd ” at all times .
“ Keep safeguards and monitoring in place , because lifting restrictions too quickly can lead to a resurgence , ” Tedros added .
“ We have seen around the world that it ’ s never too late to turn this pandemic around .
If we act together today , we can save lives , we can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ together.
” This is not the first time , by the way , that the WHO has admitted that future vaccines for the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) will not work .
The question that remains , however , is : Are people actually paying attention ?
Tedros and the WHO have repeatedly stated that these jabs will not work , and yet in the same breath they are pushing for everyone to get them because it will “ save lives ” if we all “ do it together.
” Does that make @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not to this writer .
Meanwhile , countries like the United States and Australia are continuing to tighten the noose around their citizens concerning lockdowns , mask-wearing , social distancing , and other aspects of the new abnormal , even as most of Europe is long done with this insanity .
“ Sweden has achieved herd immunity and is not waiting around for a vaccine that will fail , ” wrote one Zero Hedge commenter about the situation .
“ No masks , no lockdowns , schools open , daily deaths in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Do you feel stupid now , muppets ?
” The latest news about the globalist effort to vaccinate the entire world for the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) , even though everybody knows that these vaccines will all be useless and harmful , is available at Pandemic.news .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

WHO Now Admits COVID19 Vaccine May Never Happen
Written by Ethan Huff
(Natural News) For all of the hype surrounding future vaccines for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), the World Health Organization’s (WHO) take on the situation is not at all promising.
During his organization’s latest briefing in Geneva, WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom admitted publicly that Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines will not work, and that a “cure” may never be found because there is supposedly “no silver bullet” for the plandemic.
Even though more than 100 potential vaccine candidates are already in development, Tedros says that none of them are likely to work and that the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) will continue to be a problem pretty much forever.
“A number of vaccines are now in phase three clinical trials and we all hope to have a number of effective vaccines that can help prevent people from infection,” Tedros is quoted as saying. “However, there’s no silver bullet at the moment and there might never be.”
In other words, it is all for naught, other than enriching pharmaceutical CEOs and other top Big Pharma executives with taxpayer cash, which is precisely what President Donald Trump’s “Operation Warp Speed” program is all about.
Tedros’ advice is simply to “do it all,” meaning get vaccinated, stay home, wear your mask all day long every day, and avoid coming into contact with other people. This, he says, is the permanent solution to the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19).
“The message to people and governments is clear: do it all,” Tedros stated, throwing out buzzwords like testing, isolation, contact tracing, quarantining, distancing, washing hands repeatedly, etcetera.
If we let them, the globalists will drag the plandemic on and on FOREVER
Tedros went on to explain that governments everywhere need to “keep strengthening the health system,” though he made absolutely no mention about people strengthening their own immune systems, which is never, ever part of the official conversation concerning health during any crisis, including this one.
Tedros wants to see more government surveillance of people, more contact tracing of people, and eventually full tracking and jabbing of all people with chip-laced vaccines that will help the globalists monitor and control the human “herd” at all times.
“Keep safeguards and monitoring in place, because lifting restrictions too quickly can lead to a resurgence,” Tedros added. “We have seen around the world that it’s never too late to turn this pandemic around. If we act together today, we can save lives, we can save livelihoods if we do it all together.”
This is not the first time, by the way, that the WHO has admitted that future vaccines for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) will not work. The question that remains, however, is: Are people actually paying attention?
Tedros and the WHO have repeatedly stated that these jabs will not work, and yet in the same breath they are pushing for everyone to get them because it will “save lives” if we all “do it together.” Does that make sense to you? It certainly does not to this writer.
Meanwhile, countries like the United States and Australia are continuing to tighten the noose around their citizens concerning lockdowns, mask-wearing, social distancing, and other aspects of the new abnormal, even as most of Europe is long done with this insanity.
“Sweden has achieved herd immunity and is not waiting around for a vaccine that will fail,” wrote one Zero Hedge commenter about the situation.
“No masks, no lockdowns, schools open, daily deaths in the single digits, and no second wave. Do you feel stupid now, muppets?”
The latest news about the globalist effort to vaccinate the entire world for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), even though everybody knows that these vaccines will all be useless and harmful, is available at Pandemic.news.
Read more at www.naturalnews.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related