principiascientificinternational--2020-07-07--Coronavirus: A perspective from Britain Part 7

In part 6 I showed a graph of the number of new cases appearing by day in Birmingham and Solihull , and after collecting another month of data , I present below the latest graph , to June 30th .
As of June 19th , there had been 1155 deaths in Birmingham , and 257 in Solihull .
This is the most recent data available .
On six days during June , there were no new cases in Birmingham , and 19 days with no new cases in Solihull .
As of the time of writing , there had been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Solihull .
Speaking at the government ’ s briefing on June 10th , Chief Scientific Advisor Patrick Vallance said “ The epidemic is shrinking , but not fast ” suggesting this means moving ‘ very carefully ’ out of lockdown .
Here is the chart showing the number of new cases in the UK as a whole as of June 30th .
Looking at the chart above , I ’ d say the decline was fairly fast .
It should not be forgotten that the more tests that are done , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ June 18th , the Office of National Statistics altered their estimate that there could be 6000 new cases per day , down to 4,500 cases per day , a drop of about 30 % .
Below are the numbers of deaths attributed to the virus per day in the UK as of June 30th .
It should be remembered the deaths figure is anyone whose death certificate mentions the virus , whether that was the cause of death or not .
The BBC virus webpage says as of 30th June , the number @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the virus had fallen from 15,100 to in early May , to 4769 , and the same day , Worldometer said there are just 279 people in critical condition in the UK .
The chart for deaths in care homes was removed from the webpage on June 11th , and has not been reinstated .
Regarding the number of tests done in the UK , the BBC webpage has this graphic : - The webpage also says : The BBC webpage can be seen here : - www.bbc.co.uk Worldometer is still showing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is showing 1370 .
I found out that this recovery rate is only for those who were ill enough to be classed as serious and in hospital , not for everyone found positive .
That had not been made clear before .
However , this does not explain why Covidly is still only showing just a 3 % recovery rate for hospital cases .
The large disparity I mentioned in Part 6 is still there between Worldometer and Covidly on the figures for Spain .
Worldometer now shows Spain in 6th place with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in 8th place with 249,000 cases .
At the end of May the difference was 23,000 cases , the difference now is 47,000 .
The ONS showed a rise of 856,000 new UK unemployment claims to 2.1 million in April , the biggest monthly rise since modern records began in 1971 .
Another 600,000 registered unemployed during June .
The outlook would be even bleaker were it not for the government ’ s furlough scheme .
Without the wage subsidies covering eight million jobs , the UK would be on course for an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Of the estimated 27 million UK jobs , 20 % equates to approximately five million potentially unemployed by the Autumn .
Crunch time for the labour market will come between the start of August , when the government wants employers to start paying a portion of wage subsidies , and the end of October , when the furlough scheme is due to end completely .
Remember June 1st , when new legislation was enacted which made it illegal to go into a house you do not live in , unless you are a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That was abruptly reversed just nine days later .
The PM said… On June 7th , the Technocracy website revealed a new report from the CDC in Atlanta said : The article can be seen here : technocracy.news On June 8th , the Washington Examiner carried an article about the latest revelation from the World Health Organisation , in which they appeared to say people showing no symptoms can not transmit the virus to anyone else .
The article is quite short , so I quote it in full : In a new @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that asymptomatic carriers of the coronavirus “ rarely ” spread the virus to others .
If this is true , we just shut down the nation and drove our economy into a recession for nothing .
( Emphasis added ) Like many others , I supported the initial shutdowns because I was worried that we knew too little about the coronavirus and who was spreading it , and we needed to prevent our healthcare system from being overrun .
Our health experts warned us that COVID-19 spread quickly and often unnoticeably , through @ @ @ @ @ @ @ weeks , or perhaps never at all .
Add this to a total lack of mass testing , and a temporary nationwide quarantine made sense .
But now , the entire premise of the shutdown is being questioned .
“ From the data we have , it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual , ” Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove , head of the WHO ’ s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit , said , according to CNBC .
“ It ’ s very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ put into words how infuriating this discovery is .
If asymptomatic carriers aren ’ t the problem , we could easily have localized our response to the coronavirus by asking only those with symptoms to stay home and quarantining hot-spot areas where the spread was out of control .
Instead , we adopted a one-size-fits-all approach because we were acting under the presumption that any person at any time could be spreading it to just about anyone .
( Emphasis added ) Granted , the WHO hasn ’ t exactly proven itself as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ past few months , so I ’ d like to see other researchers confirm this finding .
And , it ’ s unclear whether Kerkhove includes presymptomatic carriers within her definition of “ asymptomatic.
” But if this conclusion is indeed fact , I ’ ll be the first to admit that I was wrong for relying on the word of experts who clearly had no idea what they were talking about .
And it ’ s the experts who should be held accountable .
Because , if true , this wasn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was a grievous error that cost this country hundreds of thousands of jobs and kept people from the things they need most : family , church , and community .
We ’ ll be wrestling with the consequences of this shutdown for a long time to come , and now , we must do so knowing that it might have been for nothing .
( Emphasis added ) The article can be seen here : www.washingtonexaminer.com The following day , the Off-Guardian website carried an article exposing the actual numbers of deaths in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The figures it used were correct as of June 3rd .
It says : Those big green bars are all the people who died “ with ” Covid19 AND some other serious disease .
The little yellow bars are the people who died with Covid19 and nothing else .
( Emphasis added ) This effectively means most of those people would have died anyway from the health issues they already had , so we shut down the country for less than 2000 deaths .
The article can be seen here : off-guardian.org @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said the West Midlands will be hit by second wave of Covid cases .
The article states : The article does however note : The Office for National Statistics reported on Friday that the number of people testing positive for coronavirus in England is continuing to fall .
That rather contradicts the claims made by the health officials .
It also contradicts the cases graph above .
You also have to wonder how they know there will be a second wave .
Are we going to be told there is a second wave @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even longer ?
The article can be seen here : www.bbc.co.uk The same day , the Daily Mail reported that the two-metre ‘ rule ’ isn ’ t actually a rule at all , but just a recommendation .
The article states in part : The article can be seen here : www.dailymail.co.uk Sir Patrick Vallance , the UK ’ s chief scientific adviser , said at a daily Downing Street press briefing in early June that the two-metre advice was “ not a rule ” .
He said : “ It is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rule that says it is two metres or nothing – that is not what the advice has been and it is not what the advice is now.
” ( Emphasis added ) Also on the 12th , the BBC revealed how shops will be operating once they re-open on June 15th .
According to the article , as well as markings on the floors to indicate the direction people should move in shops , there will be : The article went on to say if clothing or shoes have been handled but not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quarantine for up to 72 hours , and people should expect queues to get into shops and extended delays at checkouts .
The article can be seen here : www.bbc.co.uk On the 15th , a tweet attributed to Mayor of London Sadiq Khan appeared saying : The following day , the UK ’ s coronavirus alert level was downgraded from four to three , after the country ’ s chief medical officers said there had been a steady decrease in cases across the UK as a whole .
Level three means the virus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could be a “ gradual relaxation of restrictions “ .
On the 18th , the BBC revealed only one of the 17 field hospitals set up in Wales has treated any patients , despite costing £166m .
The article said : The article can be see here : -www.bbc.co.uk On the 19th , the Daily Mirror ramped up the fear-factor by carrying an article saying research at University College London was indicating domestic pets could catch , carry and transmit the virus to humans , and this could cause a second wave of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CDC in Atlanta has ‘ …updated its advice telling people not to let their pets interact with other animals or people outside the house.
’ This would require millions of animals to be tested .
The article can be seen here : - www.mirror.co.uk One of my social media friends has suggested this ‘ animal infection ’ may be used to justify killing millions of farm animals as part of the other agenda to remove meat from our diets to ‘ save the planet ’ .
On the 20th , Culture Secretary Oliver @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into the two-metre social distancing rule in England will conclude “ within the coming days “ , and on the 23rd , the PM announced that churches , libraries , pubs , restaurants , cafes , cinemas , hairdressers , theme parks , social clubs , zoos etc can all re-open , subject to ‘ social distancing ’ and restricted numbers .
You can mix with two other households as long as you have no physical contact and stay six feet apart .
People are advised to remain six feet apart wherever they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If you do have to be closer than six feet from another person , face away from them and wear a mask .
In other words , do not expect anything to change in shop or supermarket queues .
If you do decide to go to a pub or restaurant , you will have to wear a mask ( how are you going to drink and eat wearing a mask ? )
, you will have to order drinks on your mobile phone as you won ’ t be allowed to go to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ perspex screens on tables so you ’ ll have to shout at each other .
Hairdressers will have to wear full face shields and limit the number of customers .
You will have to pre-book then queue to get in a cinema , and then follow one-way systems and sit separately .
I can ’ t really see much has changed .
In Leicester , almost 30 % of the city ’ s total number of virus cases were reported in the two weeks to June 23rd .
As a result , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ council to enforce a ‘ local lockdown ’ , which would mean pubs and restaurants in the city staying closed for another two weeks beyond July 4th .
Leicester has seen a big increase in the amount of testing , which has found more cases .
Who would have thought that !
The Mayor of Leicester ; Sir Peter Soulsby , was interviewed by a tv news crew on the 29th said he remains unconvinced an extension to the lockdown is necessary , then the following day said he was absolutely convinced .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ for National Statistics said the number of deaths from all causes registered in a single week has fallen below the five-year average for the first time since mid-March .
This chart shows the levels of alert in the UK .
Notice level 1 is ‘ Covid-19 no longer present in UK ’ .
I can not realistically see that ever being reached , so I think we will be stuck at level 2 indefinitely , which will mean some form of what is now being termed antisocial distancing will be in force possibly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was shown proof of how the death figures in the UK are being artificially inflated .
The Office For National Statistics , and HM Government , are allowing the virus to be put as a cause of death if a person had exhibited similar symptoms , even if no test result has been received when the death certificate was filled in .
Section 4 ‘ How to complete the cause of death section ’ of the ‘ Guidance for doctors completing Medical Certificates of Cause of Death in England and Wales ’ states @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had symptoms typical of COVID19 infection , but the test result has not been received , it would be satisfactory to give ‘ COVID-19 ’ as the cause of death ‘ .
Many people have been saying this , but this was the first time I had seen actual proof .
The document can be seen here : - In conclusion , it seems this virus is intelligent .
It will not get you if you go to the supermarket or attend mass ‘ protests ’ about a Police incident in America , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sport or a concert , go to a swimming pool , leisure centre or gym , or a protest about the loss of your civil rights , it will kill you .
As I and many others have already said , humans need to be exposed to viruses , bacteria and plain old dirt , to maintain a healthy immune system .
A few friends and acquaintances of mine have told me they felt ill in December last year , with many of the same symptoms now ascribed to the virus , so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suggests this current outbreak is the much-feared ‘ second wave ’ .
I ’ m surprised no-one in the media seems to have mentioned it , unless of course it is one of Baldrick ’ s cunning plans to keep people in a constant state of fear of each other .
About the author : Andy Rowlands is a regular contributor to Principia Scientific International ; a British independent researcher and writer and assistant editor of the game-changing new climate science book , The Sky Dragon Slayers : Victory Lap .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Coronavirus: A perspective from Britain Part 7
Written by Andy Rowlands
In part 6 I showed a graph of the number of new cases appearing by day in Birmingham and Solihull, and after collecting another month of data, I present below the latest graph, to June 30th.
As of June 19th, there had been 1155 deaths in Birmingham, and 257 in Solihull. This is the most recent data available. On six days during June, there were no new cases in Birmingham, and 19 days with no new cases in Solihull. As of the time of writing, there had been six consecutive days with no new cases in Solihull.
Speaking at the government’s briefing on June 10th, Chief Scientific Advisor Patrick Vallance said “The epidemic is shrinking, but not fast” suggesting this means moving ‘very carefully’ out of lockdown.
Here is the chart showing the number of new cases in the UK as a whole as of June 30th.
Looking at the chart above, I’d say the decline was fairly fast. It should not be forgotten that the more tests that are done, the more cases will be found.
On June 18th, the Office of National Statistics altered their estimate that there could be 6000 new cases per day, down to 4,500 cases per day, a drop of about 30{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}.
Below are the numbers of deaths attributed to the virus per day in the UK as of June 30th.
It should be remembered the deaths figure is anyone whose death certificate mentions the virus, whether that was the cause of death or not.
The BBC virus webpage says as of 30th June, the number of people in hospital in the UK with the virus had fallen from 15,100 to in early May, to 4769, and the same day, Worldometer said there are just 279 people in critical condition in the UK.
The chart for deaths in care homes was removed from the webpage on June 11th, and has not been reinstated.
Regarding the number of tests done in the UK, the BBC webpage has this graphic:-
The webpage also says:
The most deprived parts of England and Wales have been hit twice as hard by coronavirus as wealthier areas, according to the Office for National Statistics. Urban areas were worse-affected than rural areas and London had significantly more deaths from coronavirus per 100,000 people than any other region. Mortality rates are usually higher in deprived areas, but the virus has increased that effect.
The BBC webpage can be seen here:- www.bbc.co.uk
Worldometer is still showing N/A on UK recoveries, while Covidly is showing 1370. I found out that this recovery rate is only for those who were ill enough to be classed as serious and in hospital, not for everyone found positive. That had not been made clear before. However, this does not explain why Covidly is still only showing just a 3{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} recovery rate for hospital cases.
The large disparity I mentioned in Part 6 is still there between Worldometer and Covidly on the figures for Spain. Worldometer now shows Spain in 6th place with 296,000 cases, while Covidly shows Spain in 8th place with 249,000 cases. At the end of May the difference was 23,000 cases, the difference now is 47,000.
The ONS showed a rise of 856,000 new UK unemployment claims to 2.1 million in April, the biggest monthly rise since modern records began in 1971. Another 600,000 registered unemployed during June. The outlook would be even bleaker were it not for the government’s furlough scheme. Without the wage subsidies covering eight million jobs, the UK would be on course for an unemployment rate of about 20{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}. Of the estimated 27 million UK jobs, 20{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} equates to approximately five million potentially unemployed by the Autumn.
Crunch time for the labour market will come between the start of August, when the government wants employers to start paying a portion of wage subsidies, and the end of October, when the furlough scheme is due to end completely.
Remember June 1st, when new legislation was enacted which made it illegal to go into a house you do not live in, unless you are a workman or to give medical assistance? That was abruptly reversed just nine days later. The PM said…
“From this weekend we will allow single adult households to form a ‘support bubble’ with one other household. All those in a support bubble will be able to act as if they live in the same household, meaning they can spend time together inside each other’s homes and do not need to stay 2m apart. The support bubble must be exclusive, and cannot be switched between multiple households.”
So choose your bubble wisely!
On June 7th, the Technocracy website revealed a new report from the CDC in Atlanta said:
For the first time, the CDC has attempted to offer a real estimate of the overall death rate for COVID-19, and under its most likely scenario, the number is 0.26{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}, almost exactly where Stanford researchers pegged it a month ago. (Emphasis added)
The article can be seen here: technocracy.news
On June 8th, the Washington Examiner carried an article about the latest revelation from the World Health Organisation, in which they appeared to say people showing no symptoms cannot transmit the virus to anyone else.
The article is quite short, so I quote it in full:
In a new report, the World Health Organization announced that asymptomatic carriers of the coronavirus “rarely” spread the virus to others. If this is true, we just shut down the nation and drove our economy into a recession for nothing. (Emphasis added)
Like many others, I supported the initial shutdowns because I was worried that we knew too little about the coronavirus and who was spreading it, and we needed to prevent our healthcare system from being overrun. Our health experts warned us that COVID-19 spread quickly and often unnoticeably, through carriers who might not show symptoms for weeks, or perhaps never at all. Add this to a total lack of mass testing, and a temporary nationwide quarantine made sense. But now, the entire premise of the shutdown is being questioned. “From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual,” Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the WHO’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, said, according to CNBC. “It’s very rare.” It’s difficult to put into words how infuriating this discovery is. If asymptomatic carriers aren’t the problem, we could easily have localized our response to the coronavirus by asking only those with symptoms to stay home and quarantining hot-spot areas where the spread was out of control. Instead, we adopted a one-size-fits-all approach because we were acting under the presumption that any person at any time could be spreading it to just about anyone. (Emphasis added) Granted, the WHO hasn’t exactly proven itself as a reputable source of information over the past few months, so I’d like to see other researchers confirm this finding. And, it’s unclear whether Kerkhove includes presymptomatic carriers within her definition of “asymptomatic.” But if this conclusion is indeed fact, I’ll be the first to admit that I was wrong for relying on the word of experts who clearly had no idea what they were talking about. And it’s the experts who should be held accountable. Because, if true, this wasn’t just a mild mistake. It was a grievous error that cost this country hundreds of thousands of jobs and kept people from the things they need most: family, church, and community. We’ll be wrestling with the consequences of this shutdown for a long time to come, and now, we must do so knowing that it might have been for nothing. (Emphasis added)
The article can be seen here: www.washingtonexaminer.com
The following day, the Off-Guardian website carried an article exposing the actual numbers of deaths in the UK caused directly by the virus. The figures it used were correct as of June 3rd. It says:
Over 95{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of “COVID Deaths” recorded in England and Wales had potentially serious comorbidities, according to statistics released by NHS England. The latest figures make for pretty stark reading. Or, rather, they would make for stark reading…if they didn’t follow the exact same pattern already shown in other nations around the world. We’re going to focus on the comorbidity stats. Here are the number of deaths where Covid19 was listed as the only cause, split by age: Ages 0-19: 3
Ages 20-39: 32
Ages 40-59: 255
Ages 60-79: 551
Ages 80+: 477 These are across all of England and Wales since the beginning of the “pandemic”. Simply put: Of the 27045 deaths with Covid19 in English hospitals (up to June 3rd), only 1318 had no pre-existing conditions. That’s less than 5{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}. (Emphasis added) This mirrors almost exactly, the statistics reported in Italy back in March. Christopher Bowyer has made some great graphs for the figures at Hector Drummond Magazine, none more impactful than this this:
Those big green bars are all the people who died “with” Covid19 AND some other serious disease. The little yellow bars are the people who died with Covid19 and nothing else. (Emphasis added)
In fact, the 25,727 other cases were listed as having over 42,000 comorbidities. That’s almost 2 each (the report itself points out that many patients had multiple conditions). This, again, aligns completely with the Italian figures which said over 80{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of fatalities had at least 2 comorbidities. (Emphasis in original) What are these comorbidities? We don’t know. Not entirely specifically. The report lists ischemic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, asthma and dementia among others. But it also lists nearly 19,000 “other” conditions, presumably including liver failure, emphysema, AIDS, ALL forms of cancers and literally potentially thousands of other diseases. Implicit in this is the possibility that these diseases were the actual cause of death, and that Covid19 played no direct role at all. (Emphasis added) Further, the PCR test for coronavirus can return false positives in up to 80{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of cases, so it’s entirely possible the majority of these deaths never even had the virus. (Emphasis added)
This effectively means most of those people would have died anyway from the health issues they already had, so we shut down the country for less than 2000 deaths.
The article can be seen here: off-guardian.org
On June 12th, the BBC website said the West Midlands will be hit by second wave of Covid cases. The article states:
There is no question that the West Midlands will be affected by a second wave of Covid-19 cases in the UK, a top health official has warned. (Emphasis added) Dr Lisa McNally, director of public health for Sandwell Council, said the local infection rate is no longer falling and expressed concerns about the relaxing of lockdown restrictions. Speaking at Sandwell Health and Wellbeing Board on Thursday, she said: “There is little point in speculating about whether there will or won’t be a second wave of cases.” (Emphasis added) Ms McNally said there was general acknowledgment among scientists and modellers that the UK will be hit by a second round of cases.
The article does however note: The Office for National Statistics reported on Friday that the number of people testing positive for coronavirus in England is continuing to fall.
That rather contradicts the claims made by the health officials. It also contradicts the cases graph above. You also have to wonder how they know there will be a second wave. Are we going to be told there is a second wave to keep us confined in our homes even longer?
The article can be seen here: www.bbc.co.uk
The same day, the Daily Mail reported that the two-metre ‘rule’ isn’t actually a rule at all, but just a recommendation. The article states in part:
Back in March, when the UK Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) committee was drawing up the country’s response to the crisis, it asked scientists from a sub-committee – the New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group (Nervtag) – to draw up a paper on social distancing. That paper, by Oxford University’s Professor Peter Horby, University College London’s Ben Killingsley, and Lisa Ritchie, head of infection prevention and control at NHS England, could find only four good sources of evidence for social distancing – and each suggested the risk was minimal beyond a metre or 1.5 metres. The Nervtag scientists concluded: ‘In terms of risk of transmission via close contact in the community, one metre is a minimum, two metres is precautionary.’
The article can be seen here: www.dailymail.co.uk
Sir Patrick Vallance, the UK’s chief scientific adviser, said at a daily Downing Street press briefing in early June that the two-metre advice was “not a rule”. He said: “It is wrong to portray this as a scientific rule that says it is two metres or nothing – that is not what the advice has been and it is not what the advice is now.” (Emphasis added)
Also on the 12th, the BBC revealed how shops will be operating once they re-open on June 15th. According to the article, as well as markings on the floors to indicate the direction people should move in shops, there will be:
People will also be asked to keep a set distance between each other on escalators, and only one person at a time will be allowed to use a lift unless they are from the same household. There will be hand sanitising stations throughout shops and people will be encouraged to use hand gel when they enter a shop. Government guidelines recommend people should shop alone where possible so hopes of hitting the stores with friends will have to wait. The British Retail Consortium’s guidance is that customers should be discouraged from handling products that they’re not going to buy.
The article went on to say if clothing or shoes have been handled but not purchased, they should be placed in quarantine for up to 72 hours, and people should expect queues to get into shops and extended delays at checkouts.
It continues:
We are basically living in a constant state of fear and anxiety – don’t leave the house, don’t touch anyone, don’t do exactly what you were doing before – this is not a normal way of human behaviour (Emphasis added) That means people will be going back to shops after more than three months “with a pre-existing huge ball of negativity in our head, whether we want it or not“. (Emphasis added)
The article can be seen here: www.bbc.co.uk
On the 15th, a tweet attributed to Mayor of London Sadiq Khan appeared saying:
‘For the next year or so, wearing face coverings will be the norm rather than the exception’
The following day, the UK’s coronavirus alert level was downgraded from four to three, after the country’s chief medical officers said there had been a steady decrease in cases across the UK as a whole. Level three means the virus is still in general circulation but there could be a “gradual relaxation of restrictions“.
On the 18th, the BBC revealed only one of the 17 field hospitals set up in Wales has treated any patients, despite costing £166m. The article said:
Buildings, including sports stadiums and theatres, were rapidly turned into hospitals at the peak of the crisis. But only the Dragon’s Heart Hospital in Cardiff has received any patients. Health Minister Vaughan Gething defended the decision saying in hindsight he would have “made different choices at the time”. A review is due later this month to decide how many field hospitals will be retained or repurposed. A health economist from Swansea University said that, in hindsight, spending £166m on 46 patients was “not a good use of limited resources”. (Emphasis added) The health board has said the Dragon’s Heart Hospital site would be “retained until the autumn and will be available to admit coronavirus patients should a surge in capacity be required”.
The article can be see here:-www.bbc.co.uk
On the 19th, the Daily Mirror ramped up the fear-factor by carrying an article saying research at University College London was indicating domestic pets could catch, carry and transmit the virus to humans, and this could cause a second wave of cases.
“There’s an urgent need for widespread surveillance, by testing samples, preferably non-invasively, from large numbers of animals, particularly pets, livestock and wildlife that are in close proximity to human populations.” ‘If an animal tests positive for coronavirus they will need to be quarantined or culled.’ (Emphasis added)
The article also claims the CDC in Atlanta has ‘…updated its advice telling people not to let their pets interact with other animals or people outside the house.’
This would require millions of animals to be tested.
The article can be seen here:- www.mirror.co.uk
One of my social media friends has suggested this ‘animal infection’ may be used to justify killing millions of farm animals as part of the other agenda to remove meat from our diets to ‘save the planet’.
On the 20th, Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden told the BBC that a review into the two-metre social distancing rule in England will conclude “within the coming days“, and on the 23rd, the PM announced that churches, libraries, pubs, restaurants, cafes, cinemas, hairdressers, theme parks, social clubs, zoos etc can all re-open, subject to ‘social distancing’ and restricted numbers.
You can mix with two other households as long as you have no physical contact and stay six feet apart.
People are advised to remain six feet apart wherever they are unless there is no alternative. If you do have to be closer than six feet from another person, face away from them and wear a mask. In other words, do not expect anything to change in shop or supermarket queues.
If you do decide to go to a pub or restaurant, you will have to wear a mask (how are you going to drink and eat wearing a mask?), you will have to order drinks on your mobile phone as you won’t be allowed to go to the bar, and there will be perspex screens on tables so you’ll have to shout at each other.
Hairdressers will have to wear full face shields and limit the number of customers. You will have to pre-book then queue to get in a cinema, and then follow one-way systems and sit separately.
I can’t really see much has changed.
In Leicester, almost 30{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of the city’s total number of virus cases were reported in the two weeks to June 23rd. As a result, the government has suggested it may advise the council to enforce a ‘local lockdown’, which would mean pubs and restaurants in the city staying closed for another two weeks beyond July 4th.
Leicester has seen a big increase in the amount of testing, which has found more cases. Who would have thought that! The Mayor of Leicester; Sir Peter Soulsby, was interviewed by a tv news crew on the 29th said he remains unconvinced an extension to the lockdown is necessary, then the following day said he was absolutely convinced.
Also on the 30th, the Office for National Statistics said the number of deaths from all causes registered in a single week has fallen below the five-year average for the first time since mid-March.
This chart shows the levels of alert in the UK. Notice level 1 is ‘Covid-19 no longer present in UK’. I cannot realistically see that ever being reached, so I think we will be stuck at level 2 indefinitely, which will mean some form of what is now being termed antisocial distancing will be in force possibly for years.
On July 2nd I was shown proof of how the death figures in the UK are being artificially inflated. The Office For National Statistics, and HM Government, are allowing the virus to be put as a cause of death if a person had exhibited similar symptoms, even if no test result has been received when the death certificate was filled in.
Section 4 ‘How to complete the cause of death section’ of the ‘Guidance for doctors completing Medical Certificates of Cause of Death in England and Wales’ states: ‘if before death the patient had symptoms typical of COVID19 infection, but the test result has not been received, it would be satisfactory to give ‘COVID-19’ as the cause of death‘.
Many people have been saying this, but this was the first time I had seen actual proof.
The document can be seen here:-
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
and here:-
www.gov.uk/government
In conclusion, it seems this virus is intelligent. It will not get you if you go to the supermarket or attend mass ‘protests’ about a Police incident in America, but if you go to watch a sport or a concert, go to a swimming pool, leisure centre or gym, or a protest about the loss of your civil rights, it will kill you.
As I and many others have already said, humans need to be exposed to viruses, bacteria and plain old dirt, to maintain a healthy immune system.
A few friends and acquaintances of mine have told me they felt ill in December last year, with many of the same symptoms now ascribed to the virus, so if that is the case, it suggests this current outbreak is the much-feared ‘second wave’. I’m surprised no-one in the media seems to have mentioned it, unless of course it is one of Baldrick’s cunning plans to keep people in a constant state of fear of each other.
About the author: Andy Rowlands is a regular contributor to Principia Scientific International; a British independent researcher and writer and assistant editor of the game-changing new climate science book, The Sky Dragon Slayers: Victory Lap.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-07-09--Exposed: NIH Owns Patent for Controversial COVID-19 Vaccine

New documents obtained by Axios and Public Citizen suggest that the National Institute of Health ( NIH ) owns half the key patent for Moderna ’ s controversial COVID vaccine and could collect half the royalties .
In addition , four NIH scientists have filed their own provisional patent application as co-inventors .
Little known NIH regulations let agency scientists collect up to $ 150,000.00 annually in royalties from vaccines upon which they worked .
These rules are recipes for regulatory corruption .
NIH ’ s stake in the jab may explain why Anthony Fauci moved Moderna ’ s vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to let Moderna skip animal trials despite the experimental technology and the inherent dangers of Coronavirus vaccines .
Every prior coronavirus vaccine has proven problematic and can be lethal to animals due to COVID ’ s unique penchant for “ pathogenic priming.
” Death occurs only after a vaccinated animal encounters the wild virus .
Public health advocates and scientists criticized Fauci ’ s decision to skip animal trials as reckless .
It may also explain why Anthony Fauci arranged a $ 483 million grant to Moderna from a sister NIH agency , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has never brought a product to market or gotten approval .
Fauci ’ s infusion made Moderna CEO Steve Bancel a billionaire and further enriched Fauci ’ s mentor and co-investor Bill Gates .
It may also explain why Fauci publicly announced he was “ encouraged ” by Moderna ’ s catastrophic Phase 1 clinical trials despite the fact that 20 % of the high dose and 6 % of the low dose groups of super healthy volunteers had Grade 3 “ severe or medically significant ” reactions following vaccination .
Those results @ @ @ @ @ @ @ medical product .
After getting the abysmal news , Bancel and four other Moderna executives immediately dumped more than $ 89 million in stock and Fauci was forced to make his optimistic public assessment to save Moderna ’ s plummeting shares from death spiral .
Fauci painted lipstick on that lame donkey and now he ’ s trying to convince everyone it ’ s a thoroughbred .
Moderna and NIH began manufacturing the first of 1 billion doses of the deadly vaccine this month .
Fauci knows from experience that no matter how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is convincing people to take it .
Pharma , after all , controls the media .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Exposed: NIH Owns Patent for Controversial COVID-19 Vaccine
Written by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
New documents obtained by Axios and Public Citizen suggest that the National Institute of Health (NIH) owns half the key patent for Moderna’s controversial COVID vaccine and could collect half the royalties.
In addition, four NIH scientists have filed their own provisional patent application as co-inventors. Little known NIH regulations let agency scientists collect up to $150,000.00 annually in royalties from vaccines upon which they worked. These rules are recipes for regulatory corruption.
NIH’s stake in the jab may explain why Anthony Fauci moved Moderna’s vaccine to the front of the line and to let Moderna skip animal trials despite the experimental technology and the inherent dangers of Coronavirus vaccines. Every prior coronavirus vaccine has proven problematic and can be lethal to animals due to COVID’s unique penchant for “pathogenic priming.” Death occurs only after a vaccinated animal encounters the wild virus.
Public health advocates and scientists criticized Fauci’s decision to skip animal trials as reckless. It may also explain why Anthony Fauci arranged a $483 million grant to Moderna from a sister NIH agency, BARDA, despite the fact that Moderna has never brought a product to market or gotten approval.
Fauci’s infusion made Moderna CEO Steve Bancel a billionaire and further enriched Fauci’s mentor and co-investor Bill Gates. It may also explain why Fauci publicly announced he was “encouraged” by Moderna’s catastrophic Phase 1 clinical trials despite the fact that 20{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of the high dose and 6{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of the low dose groups of super healthy volunteers had Grade 3 “severe or medically significant” reactions following vaccination. Those results would have spelled DOA for any other medical product. After getting the abysmal news, Bancel and four other Moderna executives immediately dumped more than $89 million in stock and Fauci was forced to make his optimistic public assessment to save Moderna’s plummeting shares from death spiral.
Fauci painted lipstick on that lame donkey and now he’s trying to convince everyone it’s a thoroughbred. Moderna and NIH began manufacturing the first of 1 billion doses of the deadly vaccine this month. Fauci knows from experience that no matter how dangerous a vaccine, the easy part is convincing people to take it. Pharma, after all, controls the media.
Read more at childrenshealthdefense.org
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-07-09--ICAN Now Sues NIH to Come Clean on the COVID Vaccine Cover Up

ICAN Now Sues NIH to Come Clean on the COVID Vaccine Cover Up Legal pressure mounts on NIH to come clean on the extent of cronyism and suspicious secret science underpinning the fiasco of the COVID-19 ‘ pandemic.
’ The Informed Consent Action Network ( ICAN ) has filed a lawsuit against the National Institutes of Health because NIH has not provided records responding to ICAN ’ s Freedom of Information Act ( FOIA ) requests related to the coronavirus pandemic .
The legal action comes on the back of ICAN ’ s successful legal victory in March 2020 when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ NO studies to back their claims that vaccines given in the first six months of life do not cause autism .
Download the PDF of that court ruling here : https : //www.icandecide.org/lawsuits The HighWire with Del Bigtree lays out the rationale for their new lawsuit in this short video : One of many irregularities being exposed is the obvious conflicts of interest whereby Dr Fauci ’ s wife , Christine Grady , is the NIH Chief of Bioethics and Human Subjects Research .
In her position Mrs Fauci is responsible for determining @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the normal drug and vaccine testing .
Claims have been made that several key figures , alongside the Fauci ’ s have conspired with billionaire , Bill Gates in a scam to implement a pre-determined vaccination plan to greatly enrich an elite core of private investors .
Now more than ever , it is imperative that regulatory agencies overseeing the healthcare industry are fully transparent with the public to ensure the true safety and efficacy of all products .
Follow and subscribe to HighWire at : www.youtube.com PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

ICAN Now Sues NIH to Come Clean on the COVID Vaccine Cover Up
Written by John O'Sullivan
Legal pressure mounts on NIH to come clean on the extent of cronyism and suspicious secret science underpinning the fiasco of the COVID-19 ‘pandemic.’
The Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) has filed a lawsuit against the National Institutes of Health because NIH has not provided records responding to ICAN’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests related to the coronavirus pandemic.
The legal action comes on the back of ICAN’s successful legal victory in March 2020 when it was ruled that the CDC has NO studies to back their claims that vaccines given in the first six months of life do not cause autism. Download the PDF of that court ruling here: https://www.icandecide.org/lawsuits
The HighWire with Del Bigtree lays out the rationale for their new lawsuit in this short video:
One of many irregularities being exposed is the obvious conflicts of interest whereby Dr Fauci’s wife, Christine Grady, is the NIH Chief of Bioethics and Human Subjects Research. In her position Mrs Fauci is responsible for determining what drugs get rubber stamp exceptions to the normal drug and vaccine testing.
Claims have been made that several key figures, alongside the Fauci’s have conspired with billionaire, Bill Gates in a scam to implement a pre-determined vaccination plan to greatly enrich an elite core of private investors.
Now more than ever, it is imperative that regulatory agencies overseeing the healthcare industry are fully transparent with the public to ensure the true safety and efficacy of all products.
Follow and subscribe to HighWire at: www.youtube.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-07-09--CDC May Officially Downgrade COVID from an ‘Epidemic’

CDC May Officially Downgrade COVID from an ‘ Epidemic ’ The coronavirus mortality rate in the United States has dropped so low that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may soon stop calling the virus an “ epidemic.
” The agency explained last Friday that the COVID-19 mortality rate has dropped so low that “ the percentage is currently at the epidemic threshold.
” According to the CDC , an “ epidemic ” is “ an increase , often sudden , in the number of cases of a disease above what is normally expected in that population in that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an epidemic happening on a global scale .
The media has been stoking panic for weeks over an increase in cases across the Sun Belt , which has been partly driven by record levels of testing .
However , national data show , as the CDC explained , that the mortality rate for COVID-19 has steadily decreased nationwide after peaking in late April .
That metric , in conjunction with antibody tests that consistently show scores more people have likely contracted COVID-19 than testing data reflects , means that the mortality rate for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ testing calculations would suggest .
In fact , Dr. Scott Atlas explained on Fox News Monday that current testing data is deceptive .
Dr. Atlas said the real story is not “ how many cases ” but “ who gets the cases.
” And as the median age for COVID-positive patients craters , that means the American population is growing in so-called “ herd immunity , ” according to Dr. Atlas .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

CDC May Officially Downgrade COVID from an ‘Epidemic’
Written by Chris Enloe
The coronavirus mortality rate in the United States has dropped so low that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may soon stop calling the virus an “epidemic.” The agency explained last Friday that the COVID-19 mortality rate has dropped so low that “the percentage is currently at the epidemic threshold.”
“Based on death certificate data, the percentage of deaths attributed to pneumonia, influenza or COVID-19 (PIC) decreased from 9.0{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} during week 25 to 5.9{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} during week 26, representing the tenth week of a declining percentage of deaths due to PIC,” the agency wrote on its website.
According to the CDC, an “epidemic” is “an increase, often sudden, in the number of cases of a disease above what is normally expected in that population in that area.” A “pandemic” is an epidemic happening on a global scale.
The CDC’s update is good news.
The media has been stoking panic for weeks over an increase in cases across the Sun Belt, which has been partly driven by record levels of testing.
However, national data show, as the CDC explained, that the mortality rate for COVID-19 has steadily decreased nationwide after peaking in late April.
That metric, in conjunction with antibody tests that consistently show scores more people have likely contracted COVID-19 than testing data reflects, means that the mortality rate for COVID-19 is likely much lower than current testing calculations would suggest.
In fact, Dr. Scott Atlas explained on Fox News Monday that current testing data is deceptive.
Dr. Atlas said the real story is not “how many cases” but “who gets the cases.” And as the median age for COVID-positive patients craters, that means the American population is growing in so-called “herd immunity,” according to Dr. Atlas.
Read more at www.theblaze.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-07-08--BLACK HOLE RADIATION: New paper for Open Review

Regular contributor , Robert Beatty has submitted his latest paper on BLACK HOLE RADIATION for open peer review by our loyal readers .
Please feel free to provide feedback in the ‘ comments ’ section below to assist in our ongoing review of this new PROM paper ( read here for more information about our PROM review process ) .
This paper completes a review of the Gravispheres concept wherein black hole V616 is regarded as the centre of the gravisphere in which the Solar System resides .
V616 also represents the location where the strongest local gravity field exists @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) from that point .
Detail of how EGS form includes a consideration of positronium , Feynman Diagrams , Hawking radiation , quantum entanglement , and quantum energy teleportation .
The energy gains of a black hole show that 12.05 % of the incoming energy is retained at the black hole .
The full PDF is free to view and download here : BLACK HOLE RADIATION : ENTANGLED GRAVITY The BIG BANG OR STEADY STATE [ 2 ] paper shows the illustration in Figure 1 .
It concludes that Black Hole ( BH @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) is the centre of our gravitational zone of influence , and that the Solar System gravity forms at V616 .
The gravity so formed follows the inverse-square law to become weaker with increasing distance from the BH .
Included , is a distance calculation that compares the gravity attraction to the electromagnetic attraction of an electron towards a proton , which is 10^39 greater .
This treatise implies that the “ Gravitational Constant ” [ 4 ] value G varies throughout the universe , and also suggests material digested into BHs results @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being formed at the BH .
This figure shows the BH structure with incoming mass moving along the first Event Horizon where electrons , protons and neutrons are progressively stripped off .
These components form into EGS , cosmic rays and enhanced BH mass , respectively .
Neutrons become ‘ free ’ neutrons which normally would suffer a half life decay of 10 to 15 minutes .
This is a particular conundrum facing research into neutron stars and BHs as further discussed .
[ 6 ] The Natural Gravity paper [ 7 ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is centered on BH V616 , where the most energetic rays at 3.10E+008 joules per photon attach preferably to the largest solar system mass , being the Sun .
The GRAVIMASS [ 8 ] report highlights the difference between fixed and elastic links concluding that the nature of gravity is elastic and can transmit energy to objects operating within its gravitational field .
It further concludes that transfer of energy to the Earth during its orbit around the Sun , results in energy being converted to mass at the calculated rate of 212,245 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ expanding earth .
The average density of the Earth is quoted as 5.51 g/cm3 ( 5,500 kg/m3 ) .
This is close to the density of the mineral Chalcocite ( Cu S ) which will be regarded as the average representation of the Earth ’ s components .
Using this information , we can calculate the rate of energy transfer from V616 to Earth shown in Table 1 .
Hawking radiation , Radiation theoretically emitted from just outside the event horizon of a black hole .
Stephen W. Hawking proposed in 1974 that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and some massive particles ) arising naturally near the event horizon may result in one particle ’ s escaping the vicinity of the black hole while the other particle , of negative energy , disappears into it .
The flow of particles of negative energy into the black hole reduces its mass until it disappears completely in a final burst of radiation .
As new mass enfolds into a BH , there must be an equivalent mass or energy retained , or emitted so that the overall state of ‘ entropy ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ entangled particles generated at a BH also transmit energy .
Some of the energy is in the form of entangled particles delivering gravity , while another energy form emerges as cosmic radiation .
The retained mass fraction stays in the BH which increases in size over time , provided material continues to enter the BH .
BH radiation appears to be a variable emission based on the quantity of material entering the region .
This is similar to feeding a fire with fuel .
Smoke and flames appear as new fuel is added @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consumed .
“ Quantum entanglement is a physical phenomenon that occurs when pairs or groups of particles are generated or interact in ways such that the quantum state of each particle can not be described independently of the others , even when the particles are separated by a large distance—instead , a quantum state must be described for the system as a whole.
” This definition allows for “ groups of particles ” to be entangled which is assumed to be the case at V616 .
In this model there is one end @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , while the other ends radiate in a spherical pattern forming the V616 Gravisphere .
We have seen that vacuum fluctuations produce particle pairs near the horizon .
One member of the pair is inside , and one outside .
Suppose for concreteness that particles making up the pair are an electron and a positron .
Is the electron inside the horizon , or is the positron inside the horizon ?
From what we have seen about entangled states , we can guess that the state we will get is an entangled state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inside if the positron is outside , and the positron is inside if the electron is outside .
However , positrons associated with a BH appear to form a vital function , because the positive charge inherent to the positron , stabilise the neutrons within the BH .
Under these circumstances , the entangled electron-positron pair will always have the positron residing in the BH .
The electron is free to radiate from the BH in a fashion predicted by Hawking Radiation .
[ 19 ] Under these circumstances , the entangled particles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 20 ] Protocols of quantum energy teleportation ( QET ) , while retaining causality and local energy conservation , enable the transportation of energy from a subsystem of a many-body quantum system to a distant subsystem by local operations and classical communication through ground-state entanglement .
We prove two energy-entanglement inequalities for a minimal QET model .
These relations help us to gain a profound understanding of entanglement itself as a physical resource by relating entanglement to energy as an evident physical resource .
A conduit field appears to operate as an elastic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the V616 Gravisphere .
As a conduit link it is possible to regard the entire conduit as a single entity .
Activity anywhere along the EGS link provides simultaneous reaction throughout the entangled group , and is not dependant on the speed of light Feynman Diagrams are pictorial representations of the interactions of subatomic particles .
The big advantage of Feynman Diagrams is that it not only tells you what goes into the interaction and what comes out , but also what goes on during the interaction itself .
In this discussion the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ follows : [ 24 ] This raises the question : “ Can the down quark associate with a positron , stabilise a free neutron by preventing ‘ one of the neutron ’ s down quarks becoming an up quark ” ?
Free neutrons are defined as neutrons operating without a proton associate .
Under those circumstances the neutron becomes unstable and is known to have a short half-life and rapidly deteriorates into a proton , electron and an antineutrino .
[ 27 ] It appears that the positive charge associated with the proton @ @ @ @ @ @ @ must be a form of stabilisation for a free neutron to explain how these particles can exist in a stable state at megnetars , neutron stars , BHs , and elsewhere in the universe .
[ 28 ] Of interest in the current BH discussion is ; can the positive proton charge be replaced by the positive charge of a positron , if so how ?
The details of the Quark Diagram Figure 5 suggest how this might occur .
The Feynman Diagram at the bottom of the Neutrons column shows a free @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The positronium diagram includes an e+ charge , and shows the situation presumed to occur as an electron enters a BH at a similar time that a free neutron forms .
Before the neutron can decay , a positron attaches to the neutron , providing the required stabilising positive charge .
However , the positron is still entangled with its electron which radiates from the BH , as an entangled particle .
This entangled association at a BH is expected to cause the strong gravity field inherent to a BH .
The current @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appears as Figure 6 : Figure 6 shows the positronium combination entering the BH together with neutrons and protons .
The protons become separated and eject as Cosmic Rays close to the speed of light , due to the high positive charge within the BH .
[ 29 ] Free neutrons associate with positrons staying within the BH while also being entangled with their electron pair , as it radiates from the BH forming a strong gravity field .
If a planet like the Earth entered a BH , there would be a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the following logic .
The average Earth density is reported to be approximately 5.5 g/cc , close to the density of Chalcocite Cu S. A molecule of Chalcocite includes 2 atoms of Cu , combined with one atom of S as shown in Figure 10 .
[ 30 ] A Chalcocite molecule consists of 74 protons , 74 electrons , and 86 neutrons .
Now assume one molecule is consumed at a BH .
The energy released going into the BH includes , the strong nuclear hadron force between Cu and S as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attaching to the electrons .
The rest energy of this combination amounts to a total of 2.41E-008 joules , shown in Table 2 , under BH Reconciliation .
The energy released from the BH includes both rest and kinetic energy as protons in cosmic rays , and electrons associated with the gravity field radiation .
This amounts to 2.12E-008 joules .
The energy gain at the BH of 2.90E-008 joules includes both neutrons and positrons , and shows that 12.05 % of the incoming energy is retained at the BH .
• Energy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sun , and is consistent with a submarine hum recorded in the Indian Ocean .
• The retained mass fraction stays in the BH which increases in size over time , provided material continues to enter the BH .
• BH radiation appears as a variable emission based on the quantity of entering material .
Positrons associated with a BH appear to form a vital function by stabilising neutrons within the BH .
• The entangled electron-positron pair at a BH will always have the positron residing inside the BH .
• The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ BH .
• Electrons stay entangled with their positrons inside a BH , to form EGS gravity fields .
• The positive proton charge of a neutron might be replaced by the positive charge from a positron .
• A positronium combination might lead to an entangled association with an electron which forms into a gravity field .
• The BH retains 12.05 % more energy than is released .
• A BH will grow in size as long as incoming material feeds into it .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

BLACK HOLE RADIATION: New paper for Open Review
Written by Robert A. Beatty BE (Minerals) FAusIMM(CP)
Regular contributor, Robert Beatty has submitted his latest paper on BLACK HOLE RADIATION for open peer review by our loyal readers. Please feel free to provide feedback in the ‘comments’ section below to assist in our ongoing review of this new PROM paper ( read here for more information about our PROM review process).
ABSTRACT
This paper completes a review of the Gravispheres concept wherein black hole V616 is regarded as the centre of the gravisphere in which the Solar System resides. V616 also represents the location where the strongest local gravity field exists with electromagnetic gravity strings radiating (EGS) from that point. Detail of how EGS form includes a consideration of positronium, Feynman Diagrams, Hawking radiation, quantum entanglement, and quantum energy teleportation. The energy gains of a black hole show that 12.05{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of the incoming energy is retained at the black hole.
The full PDF is free to view and download here: BLACK HOLE RADIATION:ENTANGLED GRAVITY
BACKGROUND
The BIG BANG OR STEADY STATE[2] paper shows the illustration in Figure 1. It concludes that Black Hole (BH) AO620/V616Mon[3] (V616) is the centre of our gravitational zone of influence, and that the Solar System gravity forms at V616.
The gravity so formed follows the inverse-square law to become weaker with increasing distance from the BH. Included, is a distance calculation that compares the gravity attraction to the electromagnetic attraction of an electron towards a proton, which is 10^39 greater.
Figure 1.
This treatise implies that the “Gravitational Constant”[4] value G varies throughout the universe, and also suggests material digested into BHs results in positrons with electrons (positroniums) being formed at the BH.
Positrons and electrons remain entangled to form Electromagnetic Gravity Strings (EGS). Figure 2 illustrates a summarised BH digestion process, including “pair production”[5].
Figure 2.
This figure shows the BH structure with incoming mass moving along the first Event Horizon where electrons, protons and neutrons are progressively stripped off. These components form into EGS, cosmic rays and enhanced BH mass, respectively.
Neutrons become ‘free’ neutrons which normally would suffer a half life decay of 10 to 15 minutes. This is a particular conundrum facing research into neutron stars and BHs as further discussed.[6]
The Natural Gravity paper[7] describes how gravity in the solar system is centered on BH V616, where the most energetic rays at 3.10E+008 joules per photon attach preferably to the largest solar system mass, being the Sun.
Figure 3.
The GRAVIMASS[8] report highlights the difference between fixed and elastic links concluding that the nature of gravity is elastic and can transmit energy to objects operating within its gravitational field. It further concludes that transfer of energy to the Earth during its orbit around the Sun, results in energy being converted to mass at the calculated rate of 212,245 tonnes per annum – resulting in an expanding earth.
MASS TRANSFER FROM BLACK HOLE V616
The average density of the Earth is quoted as 5.51 g/cm3 (5,500 kg/m3). This is close to the density of the mineral Chalcocite (Cu 2 S) which will be regarded as the average representation of the Earth’s components. Using this information, we can calculate the rate of energy transfer from V616 to Earth shown in Table 1.
HAWKING RADIATION [13]
Hawking radiation, Radiation theoretically emitted from just outside the event horizon of a black hole. Stephen W. Hawking proposed in 1974 that subatomic particle pairs (photons, neutrinos, and some massive particles) arising naturally near the event horizon may result in one particle’s escaping the vicinity of the black hole while the other particle, of negative energy, disappears into it. The flow of particles of negative energy into the black hole reduces its mass until it disappears completely in a final burst of radiation.
As new mass enfolds into a BH, there must be an equivalent mass or energy retained, or emitted so that the overall state of ‘entropy’ does not change. This implies that entangled particles generated at a BH also transmit energy. Some of the energy is in the form of entangled particles delivering gravity, while another energy form emerges as cosmic radiation. The retained mass fraction stays in the BH which increases in size over time, provided material continues to enter the BH.
BH radiation appears to be a variable emission based on the quantity of material entering the region. This is similar to feeding a fire with fuel. Smoke and flames appear as new fuel is added, but disappears once the fuel is consumed.
QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT [16]
“Quantum entanglement is a physical phenomenon that occurs when pairs or groups of particles are generated or interact in ways such that the quantum state of each particle cannot be described independently of the others, even when the particles are separated by a large distance—instead, a quantum state must be described for the system as a whole.”
This definition allows for “groups of particles” to be entangled which is assumed to be the case at V616. In this model there is one end set of entangled particles residing at V616, while the other ends radiate in a spherical pattern forming the V616 Gravisphere.
Importance for the black hole problem.[18]
We have seen that vacuum fluctuations produce particle pairs near the horizon. One member of the pair is inside, and one outside.
Suppose for concreteness that particles making up the pair are an electron and a positron. Is the electron inside the horizon, or is the positron inside the horizon?
From what we have seen about entangled states, we can guess that the state we will get is an entangled state of the form
Thus the electron is inside if the positron is outside, and the positron is inside if the electron is outside.
However, positrons associated with a BH appear to form a vital function, because the positive charge inherent to the positron, stabilise the neutrons within the BH. Under these circumstances, the entangled electron-positron pair will always have the positron residing in the BH. The electron is free to radiate from the BH in a fashion predicted by Hawking Radiation.[19] Under these circumstances, the entangled particles can transport energy as described:[20]
Energy-Entanglement Relation for Quantum Energy Teleportation
Masahiro Hotta
Protocols of quantum energy teleportation (QET), while retaining causality and local energy conservation, enable the transportation of energy from a subsystem of a many-body quantum system to a distant subsystem by local operations and classical communication through ground-state entanglement. We prove two energy-entanglement inequalities for a minimal QET model. These relations help us to gain a profound understanding of entanglement itself as a physical resource by relating entanglement to energy as an evident physical resource.
A conduit field appears to operate as an elastic link between V616 and other masses in the V616 Gravisphere. As a conduit link it is possible to regard the entire conduit as a single entity. Activity anywhere along the EGS link provides simultaneous reaction throughout the entangled group, and is not dependant on the speed of light
FEYNMAN DIAGRAMS [23]
Feynman Diagrams are pictorial representations of the interactions of subatomic particles. The big advantage of Feynman Diagrams is that it not only tells you what goes into the interaction and what comes out, but also what goes on during the interaction itself.
In this discussion the decay of a neutron is relevant as follows:[24]
This raises the question: “Can the down quark associate with a positron, stabilise a free neutron by preventing ‘one of the neutron’s down quarks becoming an up quark”?
FREE NEUTRON QUARK DEPICTION
Free neutrons are defined as neutrons operating without a proton associate. Under those circumstances the neutron becomes unstable and is known to have a short half-life and rapidly deteriorates into a proton, electron and an antineutrino.[27] It appears that the positive charge associated with the proton acts to stabilise the neutron. There must be a form of stabilisation for a free neutron to explain how these particles can exist in a stable state at megnetars, neutron stars, BHs, and elsewhere in the universe.[28]
Of interest in the current BH discussion is; can the positive proton charge be replaced by the positive charge of a positron, if so how? The details of the Quark Diagram Figure 5 suggest how this might occur.
Figure 5
The Feynman Diagram at the bottom of the Neutrons column shows a free neutron with a hanging e- charge. The positronium diagram includes an e+ charge, and shows the situation presumed to occur as an electron enters a BH at a similar time that a free neutron forms. Before the neutron can decay, a positron attaches to the neutron, providing the required stabilising positive charge. However, the positron is still entangled with its electron which radiates from the BH, as an entangled particle. This entangled association at a BH is expected to cause the strong gravity field inherent to a BH. The current revision alters Figure 2, which now appears as Figure 6:
Figure 6.
Figure 6 shows the positronium combination entering the BH together with neutrons and protons. The protons become separated and eject as Cosmic Rays close to the speed of light, due to the high positive charge within the BH.[29] Free neutrons associate with positrons staying within the BH while also being entangled with their electron pair, as it radiates from the BH forming a strong gravity field.
BLACK HOLE ENERGY BALANCE
If a planet like the Earth entered a BH, there would be a release of energy, estimated by adopting the following logic. The average Earth density is reported to be approximately 5.5 g/cc, close to the density of Chalcocite Cu 2 S. A molecule of Chalcocite includes 2 atoms of Cu, combined with one atom of S as shown in Figure 10.[30]
Figure 10.
A Chalcocite molecule consists of 74 protons, 74 electrons, and 86 neutrons. Now assume one molecule is consumed at a BH. The energy released going into the BH includes, the strong nuclear hadron force between Cu and S as well as the weak nuclear lepton force attaching to the electrons.
The rest energy of this combination amounts to a total of 2.41E-008 joules, shown in Table 2, under BH Reconciliation. The energy released from the BH includes both rest and kinetic energy as protons in cosmic rays, and electrons associated with the gravity field radiation. This amounts to 2.12E-008 joules.
The energy gain at the BH of 2.90E-008 joules includes both neutrons and positrons, and shows that 12.05{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of the incoming energy is retained at the BH.
Table 2.
CONCLUSIONS Energy transfer to Earth possibly comes via the Sun, and is consistent with a submarine hum recorded in the Indian Ocean. The retained mass fraction stays in the BH which increases in size over time, provided material continues to enter the BH. BH radiation appears as a variable emission based on the quantity of entering material. Positrons associated with a BH appear to form a vital function by stabilising neutrons within the BH. The entangled electron-positron pair at a BH will always have the positron residing inside the BH. The electron is free to radiate from the BH. Electrons stay entangled with their positrons inside a BH, to form EGS gravity fields. The positive proton charge of a neutron might be replaced by the positive charge from a positron. A positronium combination might lead to an entangled association with an electron which forms into a gravity field. The BH retains 12.05{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} more energy than is released. A BH will grow in size as long as incoming material feeds into it.
REFERENCES.
[1] http://www.bosmin.com/PSL/BlackHoleRadiation.pdf
[2] http://www.bosmin.com/PSL/BigBangOrSteadyState.pdf
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A0620-00
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_constant
[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_production
[6] https://phys.org/news/2018-08-neutron-stars-puzzle-earth.html
[7] http://www.bosmin.com/PSL/InterstellarGravity.pdf
[8] http://www.bosmin.com/PSL/GRAVIMASS.pdf
[13] https://www.britannica.com/science/Hawking-radiation
[16] quantum entanglement
[18] https://www.asc.ohio-state.edu/mathur.16/infopublic/info2.4.html
[19] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation
Read the full paper at: https://principia-scientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/blackholeradiationprom.pdf
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-07-09--International Pharmaceuticals Expert Exposes Pandemic Fakery!

In a scathing assessment of governmental responses to the COVID-19 pandemic a respected former pharmaceutical assessor for Health Canada condemns systemic “ lies ” about antibody testing which , he says , “ lacks scientific validity.
” Saeed Qureshi , Ph.D. is a top pharmaceuticals expert with over 30 years in the industry .
He conducted hands-on and multi-disciplinary laboratory research for regulatory assessment purposes while working with Health Canada .
Heaping particular criticism on the FDA approved under Emergency Use Authorization or EUA , Dr Qureshi condemns the testing kits widely used as ineffective and “ such tests should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about the infection and its spread .
It certainly is a false science.
” We cite sections of Dr Qureshi ’ s findings below : “ Considering the statements below , from a randomly selected fact sheet FDA approved under Emergency Use Authorization or EUA , the current antibody testing lacks scientific validity .
This is really sad that such tests [ kits ] are being promoted or used to establish COVID-19 [ 1 ] .
As noted below the test monitors protein levels commonly known as [ IgM , IgA and IgG @ @ @ @ @ @ @ obtained from such tests should be avoided in making predictions or projections about the infection and its spread .
It certainly is a false science .
• “ A positive result with VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total Reagent Pack test may not mean that an individual ’ s current symptoms are due to COVID-19 infection.
” 2 .
“ However , a negative result does not rule out COVID-19.
” 3 .
“ The absolute sensitivity of the VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total Reagent Pack test is unknown.
” 4 .
FDA statement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ test ’ s effectiveness for diagnosing COVID-19 and why it should not be used as the sole basis to diagnose COVID-19.
” In addition , if vaccines would be developed based on such antibody tests , which does not appear to be sufficiently validated as noted above , then how reliable and valid vaccines would be ?
Please be cautious with claims in this regard .
Do FDA and USP lie ?
Of course , all the time !
FDA claims that it establishes and monitors quality of pharmaceutical products such as tablet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ neither defines quality of the products nor its measurable parameter hence it does not , or can not , determine quality of the products .
FDA claims that it establishes safety and efficacy ( as well as quality ) of pharmaceutical products using valid clinical testing ( e.g .
bioequivalence assessment ) and in vitro ( drug dissolution ) testing using USP apparatuses .
A lie – these tests , along with associated testers , have never been validated for the intended purpose .
In fact , these tests have been shown to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intended purpose .
USP claims that it provides reference standards for establishing quality of the pharmaceutical products such as tablets and capsules .
A lie – USP never provides reference standards for any product .
It provides powder or liquid samples of pure chemical compounds , not the products which patients use , however falsely promotes as reference standards of medicines .
USP claims that it provides a valid analytical test for the assessment drug release characteristics of the products for establishing and monitoring quality of the products .
A lie – the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intended purpose .
The test can not determine drug dissolution/release characteristics of any product .
It has been shown experimentally that the test provides irrelevant and highly unpredictable results/data with no relevance to product quality .
For more examples please visit here .
Manufacturers and patients should be cautious in accepting such claims from FDA and USP as well as other national and international authorities which often follow FDA/USP claims and guidances .
Please consider accepting the Citizen Petition ( under review with FDA for more than a year and a half , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ concerning products development , manufacturing and their regulatory approval .
Can we say ?
• Flu came and gone !
• Why it was called a pandemic – not clear • Discredited the bench top science – as disease state monitored with charts and their shapes ( humpy or dumpy ) with protocol/testing developed on the fly • Discredited the medicines approval system with the approval of medicines without requiring established protocols • Treatments could be suggested and implemented without having knowledge or expertise in the area of medicine .
• Exposed the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , of “ science ” at the authorities !
• Hope we learnt something not to repeat in future The unfortunate situation created by this Coronavirus pandemic is providing a serious opportunity for reassessing the current regulatory approaches in pharmaceutical products development as well as their manufacturing so that in future such irrelevant discussion can be avoided and patients can have access to modern and multiple options to treat ailments .
Hopefully in the future patients will be treated with well-established products rather than products developed on the fly or with the use @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hands and/or staying home policy which certainly are not the treatments – patients expect and deserve something better from us as scientists , physicians and regulators .
Follow the link for complete article ( link ) ( 2 ) Authorities ( including FDA ) and pharmacopeias ( including USP ) never establish quality of products !
( 1 ) They do not define quality of the products , hence it can not be measured and/or established ( link ) .
( 2 ) Suggested methods and procedures lack scientifically relevancy and validity ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , including inspections , are about operation of manufacturing not per se reflection of products quality ( link ) .
( 3 ) Is Coronavirus really causing abnormally higher number of deaths ?
Mortality in the United States , 2018 ( as of January 2020 , link ) .
“ The age-adjusted death rate decreased by 1.1 % from 731.9 deaths per 100,000 standard population in 2017 to 723.6 in 2018.
” i.e .
death rate is about 0.7236 % For the USA , having population of 331 million ( link ) , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be 199,593 deaths/month .
Now compare this number with the reported number of deaths caused by Coronavirus pandemic , which are 21,435 in about a month ’ s time as of April 12 , 2020 ( link ) which is far less than normal/standard death ( attrition ) rate .
The death rate , therefore , does not appear to support the thesis that the pandemic is killing people with abnormally high numbers .

Written by John O'Sullivan
In a scathing assessment of governmental responses to the COVID-19 pandemic a respected former pharmaceutical assessor for Health Canada condemns systemic “lies” about antibody testing which, he says, “lacks scientific validity.”
Saeed Qureshi, Ph.D. is a top pharmaceuticals expert with over 30 years in the industry. He conducted hands-on and multi-disciplinary laboratory research for regulatory assessment purposes while working with Health Canada.
Heaping particular criticism on the FDA approved under Emergency Use Authorization or EUA, Dr Qureshi condemns the testing kits widely used as ineffective and “such tests should be avoided in making predictions or projections about the infection and its spread. It certainly is a false science.”
We cite sections of Dr Qureshi’s findings below:
“Considering the statements below, from a randomly selected fact sheet FDA approved under Emergency Use Authorization or EUA, the current antibody testing lacks scientific validity. This is really sad that such tests [kits] are being promoted or used to establish COVID-19 [1]. As noted below the test monitors protein levels commonly known as [IgM, IgA and IgG] not specifically COVID-19. Logically data obtained from such tests should be avoided in making predictions or projections about the infection and its spread. It certainly is a false science.
“A positive result with VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total Reagent Pack test may not mean that an individual’s current symptoms are due to COVID-19 infection.”
2. “However, a negative result does not rule out COVID-19.”
3. “The absolute sensitivity of the VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total Reagent Pack test is unknown.”
4. FDA statement [2] “This limits the test’s effectiveness for diagnosing COVID-19 and why it should not be used as the sole basis to diagnose COVID-19.”
In addition, if vaccines would be developed based on such antibody tests, which does not appear to be sufficiently validated as noted above, then how reliable and valid vaccines would be? Please be cautious with claims in this regard.
Do FDA and USP lie? Of course, all the time!
For example:
FDA claims that it establishes and monitors quality of pharmaceutical products such as tablet and capsule. A lie – FDA neither defines quality of the products nor its measurable parameter hence it does not, or cannot, determine quality of the products.
FDA claims that it establishes safety and efficacy (as well as quality) of pharmaceutical products using valid clinical testing (e.g. bioequivalence assessment) and in vitro (drug dissolution) testing using USP apparatuses. A lie – these tests, along with associated testers, have never been validated for the intended purpose. In fact, these tests have been shown to be scientifically invalid and irrelevant for their intended purpose.
USP claims that it provides reference standards for establishing quality of the pharmaceutical products such as tablets and capsules. A lie – USP never provides reference standards for any product. It provides powder or liquid samples of pure chemical compounds, not the products which patients use, however falsely promotes as reference standards of medicines.
USP claims that it provides a valid analytical test for the assessment drug release characteristics of the products for establishing and monitoring quality of the products. A lie – the test has never been validated for the intended purpose. The test cannot determine drug dissolution/release characteristics of any product. It has been shown experimentally that the test provides irrelevant and highly unpredictable results/data with no relevance to product quality.
For more examples please visit here. Manufacturers and patients should be cautious in accepting such claims from FDA and USP as well as other national and international authorities which often follow FDA/USP claims and guidances.
Please consider accepting the Citizen Petition (under review with FDA for more than a year and a half, link) for addressing the underlying lies concerning products development, manufacturing and their regulatory approval.
Can we say?
Flu came and gone! Why it was called a pandemic – not clear Discredited the bench top science – as disease state monitored with charts and their shapes (humpy or dumpy) with protocol/testing developed on the fly Discredited the medicines approval system with the approval of medicines without requiring established protocols Treatments could be suggested and implemented without having knowledge or expertise in the area of medicine. Exposed the great weakness, perhaps more accurately ignorance, of “science” at the authorities! Hope we learnt something not to repeat in future
(1) Coronavirus pandemic: Public/patients deserve better!
The unfortunate situation created by this Coronavirus pandemic is providing a serious opportunity for reassessing the current regulatory approaches in pharmaceutical products development as well as their manufacturing so that in future such irrelevant discussion can be avoided and patients can have access to modern and multiple options to treat ailments. Hopefully in the future patients will be treated with well-established products rather than products developed on the fly or with the use of disposable gowns, masks, washing hands and/or staying home policy which certainly are not the treatments – patients expect and deserve something better from us as scientists, physicians and regulators. Follow the link for complete article (link)
(2) Authorities (including FDA) and pharmacopeias (including USP) never establish quality of products!
Reasons:
(1) They do not define quality of the products, hence it cannot be measured and/or established (link).
(2) Suggested methods and procedures lack scientifically relevancy and validity (link)
(3) GMP practices, including inspections, are about operation of manufacturing not per se reflection of products quality (link).
(3) Is Coronavirus really causing abnormally higher number of deaths?
Mortality in the United States, 2018 (as of January 2020, link).
“The age-adjusted death rate decreased by 1.1{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} from 731.9 deaths per 100,000 standard population in 2017 to 723.6 in 2018.” i.e. death rate is about 0.7236{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}
For the USA, having population of 331 million (link), normal/standard death (attrition) rate should be 199,593 deaths/month. Now compare this number with the reported number of deaths caused by Coronavirus pandemic, which are 21,435 in about a month’s time as of April 12, 2020 (link) which is far less than normal/standard death (attrition) rate.
The death rate, therefore, does not appear to support the thesis that the pandemic is killing people with abnormally high numbers.


principiascientificinternational--2020-07-09--Brazilian President: ‘I Am Doing Well’ on Hydroxychloroquine

Brazilian President : ‘ I Am Doing Well ’ on Hydroxychloroquine On Tuesday Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro announced he had tested positive for coronavirus .
In early April Jair Bolsonaro urged residents to keep the economy going despite the ongoing coronavirus pandemic .
“ We have two problems that can not be dissociated : the virus and unemployment .
Both should be treated responsibly .
But if the remedy is too much the side effect will be much more disastrous.
” “ Confirming to reporters Tuesday that he had the virus , Bolsonaro stepped b ack away from the television @ @ @ @ @ @ @ effort to show that he is well .
He also compared the virus to a rain that will fall on most people , and that some , like the elderly , must take greater care , according to The AP .
“ You can ’ t just talk about the consequences of the virus that you have to worry about .
Life goes on .
Brazil needs to produce .
You need to get the economy in gear , ″ he said , President Bolsonaro also said he was taking hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ President Bolsonaro shared some excellent news and took a swipe at his critics by tweeting out that he is doing very well with the hydroxychloroquine treatment .
“ To those who cheer against Hydroxychloroquine , but do not have alternatives , I regret to inform you that I am very well with its use and , with the grace of God , I will live for a long time to come.
” This is good news for Brazil and the anti-corruption movement .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Brazilian President: ‘I Am Doing Well’ on Hydroxychloroquine
Written by Jim Hoft
On Tuesday Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro announced he had tested positive for coronavirus. In early April Jair Bolsonaro urged residents to keep the economy going despite the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.
Jair Bolsonaro:
“We have two problems that cannot be dissociated: the virus and unemployment. Both should be treated responsibly. But if the remedy is too much the side effect will be much more disastrous.”
NBC News reported:
“Confirming to reporters Tuesday that he had the virus, Bolsonaro stepped b ack away from the television crews and removed his mask in an effort to show that he is well. He also compared the virus to a rain that will fall on most people, and that some, like the elderly, must take greater care, according to The AP. “You can’t just talk about the consequences of the virus that you have to worry about. Life goes on. Brazil needs to produce. You need to get the economy in gear,″ he said,
President Bolsonaro also said he was taking hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin to combat the virus.
On Wednesday President Bolsonaro shared some excellent news and took a swipe at his critics by tweeting out that he is doing very well with the hydroxychloroquine treatment.
President Bolsonaro: “To those who cheer against Hydroxychloroquine, but do not have alternatives, I regret to inform you that I am very well with its use and, with the grace of God, I will live for a long time to come.”
This is good news for Brazil and the anti-corruption movement.
Read more at www.thegatewaypundit.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-07-09--Scientists Query Four ‘Mysterious Signals From Outer Space’

Go outside on a hot day and feel the Sun on your skin .
Now imagine how much energy our Sun emits in an entire human lifetime .
Compress all that energy into a single burst lasting a mere millisecond and you ’ ll understand why fast radio bursts ( FRBs ) are one of the hottest topics in astronomy .
First discovered in 2007 at Australia ’ s Parkes radio telescope , FRBs are very brief , very bright single radio pulses that can last for several milliseconds .
It ’ s estimated that several thousand per day are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ most famous one is FRB 121102 , unusual because it ’ s been detected a few hundred times since it first “ burst ” onto the scene in 2014 .
FRB 121102 is coming from a small dwarf galaxy about three billion light-years from Earth .
So what ’ s causing them ?
Colliding stars ?
Supermassive black holes ?
Radio broadcasts from a distant alien civilization ?
Well , it ’ s not black holes , according to Dr. Shivani Bhandari , an astronomer with CSIRO , Australia ’ s national science @ @ @ @ @ @ @ week in The Astrophysical Journal Letters reveals that four FRBs are coming not from the heart of galaxies , but from their edge .
“ These precisely localised fast radio bursts came from the outskirts of their home galaxies , removing the possibility that they have anything to do with supermassive black holes , ” said Dr. Bhandari .
Her team found the exact location of four new fast radio bursts—FRB 180924 , FRB 181112 , FRB 190102 and FRB 190608—by zooming-in on the radio sky using a detector on the Australian Square @ @ @ @ @ @ @ telescope in outback Western Australia .
Follow-up observations were made using some of the world ’ s largest optical telescopes , including Gemini South , the Very Large Telescope , Magellan Baade , Keck and the LCOGT-1m .
Although all of the four FRBs are coming from three or four billion light-years away , all were discovered to be coming from massive galaxies that are forming new stars at a modest rate , much like our own Milky Way .
“ Just like doing video calls with colleagues shows you their homes and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into their lives , looking into the host galaxies of fast radio bursts gives us insights to their origins , ” said Dr. Bhandari .
The findings brings astronomers a step closer to understanding the origins of these mysterious signals from outer space .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Scientists Query Four ‘Mysterious Signals From Outer Space’
Written by Forbes
Go outside on a hot day and feel the Sun on your skin. Now imagine how much energy our Sun emits in an entire human lifetime.
Compress all that energy into a single burst lasting a mere millisecond and you’ll understand why fast radio bursts (FRBs) are one of the hottest topics in astronomy.
First discovered in 2007 at Australia’s Parkes radio telescope, FRBs are very brief, very bright single radio pulses that can last for several milliseconds. It’s estimated that several thousand per day are occurring over the entire sky.
The most famous one is FRB 121102, unusual because it’s been detected a few hundred times since it first “burst” onto the scene in 2014. FRB 121102 is coming from a small dwarf galaxy about three billion light-years from Earth.
So what’s causing them? Colliding stars? Supermassive black holes? Radio broadcasts from a distant alien civilization?
Well, it’s not black holes, according to Dr. Shivani Bhandari, an astronomer with CSIRO, Australia’s national science agency, whose new research published this week in The Astrophysical Journal Letters reveals that four FRBs are coming not from the heart of galaxies, but from their edge.
“These precisely localised fast radio bursts came from the outskirts of their home galaxies, removing the possibility that they have anything to do with supermassive black holes,” said Dr. Bhandari. Her team found the exact location of four new fast radio bursts—FRB 180924, FRB 181112, FRB 190102 and FRB 190608—by zooming-in on the radio sky using a detector on the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) radio telescope in outback Western Australia.
Follow-up observations were made using some of the world’s largest optical telescopes, including Gemini South, the Very Large Telescope, Magellan Baade, Keck and the LCOGT-1m.
Although all of the four FRBs are coming from three or four billion light-years away, all were discovered to be coming from massive galaxies that are forming new stars at a modest rate, much like our own Milky Way.
“Just like doing video calls with colleagues shows you their homes and gives you a bit of an insight into their lives, looking into the host galaxies of fast radio bursts gives us insights to their origins,” said Dr. Bhandari.
The findings brings astronomers a step closer to understanding the origins of these mysterious signals from outer space.
Read more at www.forbes.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related