principiascientificinternational--2020-10-19--Twitter Silences Top Trump COVID Task Force Expert

Social media companies and mainstream media outlets are on a crusade , censoring anyone who challenges the “ official ” science and narrative behind the COVID-19 virus .
It was only last week when Twitter removed New York Post ’ s bombshell stories about Hunter Biden .
Then later in the week , Amazon purged political writer James Perloff ’ s latest book , “ Covid-19 and the Agendas to Come : Red-Pilled , ” from its platform for “ violating content guidelines.
” [ PSI editor : James Perloff ’ s book is still available here : jamesperloff.com ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state – Twitter has yet again banned another tweet , this time on Saturday , from Stanford professor and now White House advisor Scott Atlas .
Atlas tweeted Saturday morning that masks do not work to prevent the spread of the virus : As per a CNN report , Atlas ’ tweet violated Twitter ’ s policy that “ prohibits sharing false or misleading content related to Covid-19 that could lead to harm.
” The Federalist points out , in an emailed response via Atlas , an array of scientific data to back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tweet , I cited the following evidence against general population masks : 1 ) Cases exploded even with mandates : Los Angeles County , Miami-Dade County , Hawaii , Alabama , the Philippines , Japan , the United Kingdom , Spain , France , Israel .
2 ) Dr. Carl Heneghan , University of Oxford , director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and editor in chief of British Medical Journal Evidence-Based Medicine : ‘ It would appear that despite two decades of pandemic preparedness , there is considerable uncertainty as to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The WHO : ‘ The widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence and there are potential benefits and harms to consider ’ ( http : //bitly.ws/afUm ) 4 ) The CDC : ‘ Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.
’ ( https : //wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article ) .
I also cited an article giving a detailed explanation of the reasons why masks might not prevent spread : https : //t.co/1hRFHsxe59 The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as US COVID-19 cases in the US surged above 70,000 on Friday , the highest daily reading since July 24 .
Atlas ’ tweet was also linked to an article in the American Institute for Economic Research that argues masks are not effective against the virus .
By trade , Atlas is a distinguished neuroradiologist , though he is not an expert in infectious diseases .
He ’ s gained a lot of attention on Fox News for his aggressive reopening strategies .
He ’ s also in favor of the herd immunity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ populations need to be protected .
In contrast , he says , younger segments of the population are allowed to keep working and consuming .
Atlas ’ former Stanford colleagues recently attacked him in a letter .
Here ’ s what they said : “ To prevent harm to the public ’ s health , we also have both a moral and ethical responsibility to call attention to the falsehoods and misrepresentations of science recently fostered by Dr. Scott Atlas , a former Stanford Medical School colleague and current senior fellow at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of his opinions and statements run counter to established science and , by doing so , undermine public-health authorities and the credible science that guides effective public health policy.
” Atlas has seen his fair share of bans ; not too long ago , the Hoover Institution released Atlas ’ s interview on YouTube , where the social media platform took down the video .
Alex Berenson , a former New York Times reporter who has been skeptical about the dangers surrounding the virus pandemic – recently tweeted : Berenson appears to back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of alternative views , or maybe , even ones backed by science , if it goes against the official narrative , the leftist thought police will be out in force to censor .
This is a genuinely Orwellian culture .
And if social media and mainstream media can silence a top government expert – they can silence anyone… Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Twitter Silences Top Trump COVID Task Force Expert
Written by Tyler Durden
Social media companies and mainstream media outlets are on a crusade, censoring anyone who challenges the “official” science and narrative behind the COVID-19 virus. It was only last week when Twitter removed New York Post’s bombshell stories about Hunter Biden.
Then later in the week, Amazon purged political writer James Perloff’s latest book, “Covid-19 and the Agendas to Come: Red-Pilled,” from its platform for “violating content guidelines.”
[PSI editor: James Perloff’s book is still available here: jamesperloff.com ]
With America descending deeper into an Orwellian state – Twitter has yet again banned another tweet, this time on Saturday, from Stanford professor and now White House advisor Scott Atlas.
Atlas tweeted Saturday morning that masks do not work to prevent the spread of the virus:
“Masks work? NO: LA, Miami, Hawaii, Alabama, France, Philippines, UK, Spain, Israel. WHO: “widespread use not supported” + many harms; Heneghan/Oxf CEBM: “despite decades, considerable uncertainty revalue”; CDC rvw May: “no sig red’n in inflnz transm’n”; learn why.”
Hours later, in a follow-up tweet, Atlas wrote:
“That means the right policy is @realDonaldTrump guideline: use masks for their intended purpose — when close to others, especially hi risk. Otherwise, social distance. No widespread mandates.”
As per a CNN report, Atlas’ tweet violated Twitter’s policy that “prohibits sharing false or misleading content related to Covid-19 that could lead to harm.”
The Federalist points out, in an emailed response via Atlas, an array of scientific data to back up his claim:
In the deleted tweet, I cited the following evidence against general population masks: 1) Cases exploded even with mandates: Los Angeles County, Miami-Dade County, Hawaii, Alabama, the Philippines, Japan, the United Kingdom, Spain, France, Israel. 2) Dr. Carl Heneghan, University of Oxford, director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and editor in chief of British Medical Journal Evidence-Based Medicine: ‘It would appear that despite two decades of pandemic preparedness, there is considerable uncertainty as to the value of wearing masks.’ (https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/masking-lack-of-evidence-with-politics/) 3) The WHO: ‘The widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence and there are potential benefits and harms to consider’ (http://bitly.ws/afUm) 4) The CDC: ‘Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.’ (https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article). I also cited an article giving a detailed explanation of the reasons why masks might not prevent spread: https://t.co/1hRFHsxe59 The tweet and surrounding removal from Twitter come as US COVID-19 cases in the US surged above 70,000 on Friday, the highest daily reading since July 24. Atlas’ tweet was also linked to an article in the American Institute for Economic Research that argues masks are not effective against the virus.
By trade, Atlas is a distinguished neuroradiologist, though he is not an expert in infectious diseases. He’s gained a lot of attention on Fox News for his aggressive reopening strategies. He’s also in favor of the herd immunity strategy, in which elderly and vulnerable populations need to be protected. In contrast, he says, younger segments of the population are allowed to keep working and consuming.
Atlas’ former Stanford colleagues recently attacked him in a letter. Here’s what they said:
“To prevent harm to the public’s health, we also have both a moral and ethical responsibility to call attention to the falsehoods and misrepresentations of science recently fostered by Dr. Scott Atlas, a former Stanford Medical School colleague and current senior fellow at the Hoover Institute at Stanford University. Many of his opinions and statements run counter to established science and, by doing so, undermine public-health authorities and the credible science that guides effective public health policy.”
Atlas has seen his fair share of bans; not too long ago, the Hoover Institution released Atlas’s interview on YouTube, where the social media platform took down the video.
Alex Berenson, a former New York Times reporter who has been skeptical about the dangers surrounding the virus pandemic – recently tweeted:
“My (non-N95) mask protects me… 1 percent of the time.”
Berenson appears to back up the tweet with CDC data…
Banning of alternative views, or maybe, even ones backed by science, if it goes against the official narrative, the leftist thought police will be out in force to censor.
This is a genuinely Orwellian culture. And if social media and mainstream media can silence a top government expert – they can silence anyone…
Read more at www.zerohedge.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-19--57 Argentine Sailors test positive for Covid-19 – After Month At Sea!

57 Argentine Sailors test positive for Covid-19 – After Month At Sea !
An Argentine fishing boat that had been at sea for 35 days returned to land when some of its 61 crew showed symptoms of the new coronavirus , Tierra del Fuego Province ’ s Health Ministry reported on Monday .
Reports later that evening from local outlets said that 57 of the crew members had tested positive for Covid-19 .
The Ushuaia 24 news portal said that all of them remain isolated on the ship , the Etchizen Maru , and that they would not be allowed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be allowed to board , it added .
The incident has attracted attention since prior to setting sail the 60 crew members had completed 14 days of mandatory quarantine in a hotel in Ushuaia , and before that they had been swabbed with a negative result , according to a statement from the Tierra del Fuego health portfolio , in the southern tip .
“ It is difficult to establish how the contagion of this crew was , since in these 35 days they have not had contact with land and the supply @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Ushuaia , ” said Alejandra Alfaro , the director of the province ’ s Atención Temprana de Salud centre .
He explained that they are studying “ what the chronology of symptoms has been like within the crew to establish the contagion timeline.
” Leandro Ballatore , chief of infectology at the Ushuaia Regional Hospital , warned that “ it is a case that escapes all the description that appears in the publications , because such a long incubation period is not described anywhere.
” The Etchizen Maru returned to the port @ @ @ @ @ @ @ showing symptoms of Covid-19 onboard , so the emergency protocol was activated and the crew was placed in mandatory isolation on board the vessel .
“ We can not yet explain how the symptoms appear .
It is somewhat striking , but we are handling five hypotheses that we have to finish evaluating to establish what happened , ” said Ballatore , a member of the province ’ s Emergency Operations Committee .
The Argentine Naval Prefecture maintains a security cordon around the boat to prevent “ nobody getting on or off without @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Etchizen Maru belongs to a firm called Pesantar , a part of the New San group , one of the main manufacturers of electronic products in the province .
Argentina exceeded 100,000 coronavirus cases on Sunday , with fatalities totalling 1,859 to date .
Around 95 percent of infections have occured in the Buenos Aires Metropolitan Area , with a population of 14 million out of 44 million Argentines .
Domestic tourism re-opened in Tierra del Fuego in late June , after more than a month of no new cases .
Since the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been only 141 cases and one death in the province .
Of those infected , only five still have the virus , as of Friday .
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

57 Argentine Sailors test positive for Covid-19 – After Month At Sea!
Written by Buenos Aires Times
An Argentine fishing boat that had been at sea for 35 days returned to land when some of its 61 crew showed symptoms of the new coronavirus, Tierra del Fuego Province’s Health Ministry reported on Monday.
Reports later that evening from local outlets said that 57 of the crew members had tested positive for Covid-19.
The Ushuaia 24 news portal said that all of them remain isolated on the ship, the Etchizen Maru, and that they would not be allowed to disembark. Only medical personnel would be allowed to board, it added.
The incident has attracted attention since prior to setting sail the 60 crew members had completed 14 days of mandatory quarantine in a hotel in Ushuaia, and before that they had been swabbed with a negative result, according to a statement from the Tierra del Fuego health portfolio, in the southern tip.
“It is difficult to establish how the contagion of this crew was, since in these 35 days they have not had contact with land and the supply is made only when leaving the port of Ushuaia,” said Alejandra Alfaro, the director of the province’s Atención Temprana de Salud centre.
He explained that they are studying “what the chronology of symptoms has been like within the crew to establish the contagion timeline.”
Leandro Ballatore, chief of infectology at the Ushuaia Regional Hospital, warned that “it is a case that escapes all the description that appears in the publications, because such a long incubation period is not described anywhere.”
The Etchizen Maru returned to the port of Ushuaia when the first crew-members began showing symptoms of Covid-19 onboard, so the emergency protocol was activated and the crew was placed in mandatory isolation on board the vessel.
“We cannot yet explain how the symptoms appear. It is somewhat striking, but we are handling five hypotheses that we have to finish evaluating to establish what happened,” said Ballatore, a member of the province’s Emergency Operations Committee.
The Argentine Naval Prefecture maintains a security cordon around the boat to prevent “nobody getting on or off without permission,” said Alfaro.
The Etchizen Maru belongs to a firm called Pesantar, a part of the New San group, one of the main manufacturers of electronic products in the province.
Argentina exceeded 100,000 coronavirus cases on Sunday, with fatalities totalling 1,859 to date. Around 95 percent of infections have occured in the Buenos Aires Metropolitan Area, with a population of 14 million out of 44 million Argentines.
Domestic tourism re-opened in Tierra del Fuego in late June, after more than a month of no new cases. Since the start of the pandemic, there have been only 141 cases and one death in the province. Of those infected, only five still have the virus, as of Friday.
Read more at www.batimes.com.ar
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-19--Another Vaccine Volunteer Comes Down With Myelitis

Another Vaccine Volunteer Comes Down With Myelitis This story was spotted by S.S. who passed it along , and it has me intrigued , because a second volunteer for Astrazeneca ’ s covid-19 virus vaccine has come down with the rare neurological condition known as myelitis , according to this article in RT : Second AstraZeneca volunteer reportedly suffers rare neurological condition , but UK company says it ’ s not related to vaccine As the article points out , Astrazeneca is denying the second case is due to the vaccine , and that the first was the result of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s this : The first participant of the British trials – which are being conducted in conjunction with Oxford University – fell ill after receiving one dose of the experimental vaccine in July .
The female volunteer was later diagnosed with transverse myelitis , a rare inflammatory disease that affects the spinal cord , causing weakness , sensory alterations , and autonomic nervous-system dysfunction .
The company ’ s spokeswoman later told the media the volunteer had undiagnosed multiple sclerosis , and the trials resumed .
The second female recipient of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in September .
AstraZeneca didn ’ t confirm her diagnosis , but a source told the New York Times it was also transverse myelitis .
On September 6 , trials of the drug were paused again , after the second woman felt ill , but they resumed in Britain , Brazil , India , and South Africa less than a week later .
The US hasn ’ t yet green-lighted the continuation of the test , however .
AstraZeneca , which has administered its vaccine to some 18,000 people worldwide , said in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the illness were “ unlikely to be associated with the vaccine , or there was insufficient evidence to say for certain that the illnesses were or were not related to the vaccine.
” Now I have to wonder… what are the odds that two volunteers for the vaccine trials both contracted the same thing , and that both were women ?
Granted , two is not a wide sample , and with only one factor involved , one can expect that a random coin toss , let us say , might produce the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tails , on two tosses .
As more tosses are made , the more the results will approach the expected 50-50 result .
But this involved the same specific disorder , and the same sex , in both cases .
I don ’ t know about you , but that raises my suspicion meter into the red zone .
But then there ’ s this at the end of the article : Notably absent is the report of any similar neurological disorders being associated with the Russian vaccine tests .
And it ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s high octane speculation and question .
Suppose , just for speculation ’ s sake , that the Russian vaccine turns out to be the only one that ( 1 ) isn ’ t loaded with a bunch of other stuff like nanotechnology , heavy metals , mercury , and Baal Gates ’ “ tracking ” system , and ( 2 ) is the only one that works , and ( 3 ) the Russian scientists involved in its creation explain why it works , and why it ’ s not such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those other things into vaccines .
I don ’ t know about you , but I have this fantasy picture in my mind of Mr. Globaloney giving interviews on television with a rather sheepish expression on his face , sitting in front of a plate of sauteed crow , explaining why we ’ re suddenly friends with Russia and those sanctions were simply a misunderstanding .
Or conversely , explaining why the Russian science is “ bad ” science because it ’ s Russian , and why the West ’ s poisonous vaccines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is real , ” just like the tests of the vaccine that the CDC recently admitted it doesn ’ t even have , and just like the statistics are completely reliable .
See you on the flip side… Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific @ @

Another Vaccine Volunteer Comes Down With Myelitis
Written by Joseph P Farrell
This story was spotted by S.S. who passed it along, and it has me intrigued, because a second volunteer for Astrazeneca’s covid-19 virus vaccine has come down with the rare neurological condition known as myelitis, according to this article in RT:
Second AstraZeneca volunteer reportedly suffers rare neurological condition, but UK company says it’s not related to vaccine
As the article points out, Astrazeneca is denying the second case is due to the vaccine, and that the first was the result of undiagnosed multiple sclerosis. But then there’s this:
The first participant of the British trials – which are being conducted in conjunction with Oxford University – fell ill after receiving one dose of the experimental vaccine in July. The female volunteer was later diagnosed with transverse myelitis, a rare inflammatory disease that affects the spinal cord, causing weakness, sensory alterations, and autonomic nervous-system dysfunction. The company’s spokeswoman later told the media the volunteer had undiagnosed multiple sclerosis, and the trials resumed. The second female recipient of the vaccine suffered complications after the follow-up dose in September. AstraZeneca didn’t confirm her diagnosis, but a source told the New York Times it was also transverse myelitis. On September 6, trials of the drug were paused again, after the second woman felt ill, but they resumed in Britain, Brazil, India, and South Africa less than a week later. The US hasn’t yet green-lighted the continuation of the test, however. AstraZeneca, which has administered its vaccine to some 18,000 people worldwide, said in internal documents that the two cases of the illness were “unlikely to be associated with the vaccine, or there was insufficient evidence to say for certain that the illnesses were or were not related to the vaccine.”
Now I have to wonder… what are the odds that two volunteers for the vaccine trials both contracted the same thing, and that both were women? Granted, two is not a wide sample, and with only one factor involved, one can expect that a random coin toss, let us say, might produce the results of two heads, or two tails, on two tosses. As more tosses are made, the more the results will approach the expected 50-50 result. But this involved the same specific disorder, and the same sex, in both cases.
I don’t know about you, but that raises my suspicion meter into the red zone.
But then there’s this at the end of the article:
Unlike AstraZeneca’s jab, Russia’s Sputnik V, the world’s first registered vaccine, uses human adenoviruses as a vector – an extensively studied approach. Earlier this month, respected British medical journal The Lancet published the Russian Ministry of Health’s Sputnik V study, showing the vaccine to be 100 percent effective, producing antibodies in all 76 participants of early-stage trials.
Notably absent is the report of any similar neurological disorders being associated with the Russian vaccine tests.
And it’s that which brings me to today’s high octane speculation and question. Suppose, just for speculation’s sake, that the Russian vaccine turns out to be the only one that (1) isn’t loaded with a bunch of other agendas stuff like nanotechnology, heavy metals, mercury, and Baal Gates’ “tracking” system, and (2) is the only one that works, and (3) the Russian scientists involved in its creation explain why it works, and why it’s not such a good idea to be putting all those other agendas things into vaccines.
I don’t know about you, but I have this fantasy picture in my mind of Mr. Globaloney giving interviews on television with a rather sheepish expression on his face, sitting in front of a plate of sauteed crow, explaining why we’re suddenly friends with Russia and those sanctions were simply a misunderstanding. Or conversely, explaining why the Russian science is “bad” science because it’s Russian, and why the West’s poisonous vaccines are really good because the “science is real,” just like the tests of the vaccine that the CDC recently admitted it doesn’t even have, and just like the statistics are completely reliable.
See you on the flip side…
Read more at gizadeathstar.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-19--UN Contradicts Its Own Data To Promote Weather Disaster Porn

UN Contradicts Its Own Data To Promote Weather Disaster Porn A new report issued by the United Nations World Meteorological Agency ( WMA ) , “ titled The Human Cost of Disasters , ” says climate change is causing more frequent and severe weather disasters each year .
PBS and other mainstream media outlets uncritically reported on the WMA report .
The U.N. ’ s own data , however , show the claims in the report are false .
According to PBS ’ s story , “ UN report : Climate change means more weather disasters every year , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attributed to weather are taking place each year.
” In particular , WMA says drought , floods , hurricanes , and wildfires have increased in number and severity in recent decades as “ global warming , ” has made the weather more extreme .
Figure 5 of the WMA ’ s own report ( reprinted below ) refutes the assertion that weather disasters are increasing .
WMA ’ s data show the number of weather-related disasters has declined by 15 percent since 2000 , as the earth has modestly warmed .
Indeed , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Drought , the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( IPCC ) reports with “ high confidence ” that precipitation has increased over mid-latitude land areas of the Northern Hemisphere ( including the United States ) during the past 70 years .
IPCC also has “ low confidence ” about any negative precipitation trends occurring globally .
Moreover , the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reports America is currently is undergoing its longest period in recorded history with less than 40 percent of the country experiencing “ very dry ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in 2017 – and then again in 2019 – registered its smallest percentage of land area experiencing drought .
Because drought is a primary climate component that would affect wildfires , it is not surprising to find real-world data show the number of wildfires and acres burned has fallen in recent decades , as well .
As reported in Climate at a Glance : Wildfires , long-term data from the U.S. National Interagency Fire Center ( NIFC ) show wildfires have dramatically declined in number and severity in recent decades .
Reporting data @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as 1926 , NIFC documents that the number of acres annually burned recently is only1/4th to 1/5th of the annual acres burned in the 1930s .
Globally , the data on wildfires are just as clear .
In his book False Alarm , Bjorn Lomborg observes : “ There is plenty of evidence for a reduction in the level of devastation caused by fire , with satellites showing a 25 percent reduction globally in burned areas just over the past 18 years … In total , the global amount of area burned as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , from 1.9 million square miles in the early part of last century to 1.4 million square miles today.
” It is easy for the U.N. ’ s WMA and mainstream media outlets like PBS to make false , alarmist climate-change claims .
We at Climate Realism , however , will continue to document and report the truth .
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

UN Contradicts Its Own Data To Promote Weather Disaster Porn
Written by H Sterling Burnett
A new report issued by the United Nations World Meteorological Agency (WMA), “titled The Human Cost of Disasters,” says climate change is causing more frequent and severe weather disasters each year.
PBS and other mainstream media outlets uncritically reported on the WMA report. The U.N.’s own data, however, show the claims in the report are false.
According to PBS’s story, “UN report: Climate change means more weather disasters every year,” the WMA claims, “more disasters attributed to weather are taking place each year.”
In particular, WMA says drought, floods, hurricanes, and wildfires have increased in number and severity in recent decades as “global warming,” has made the weather more extreme.
Figure 5 of the WMA’s own report (reprinted below) refutes the assertion that weather disasters are increasing.
WMA’s data show the number of weather-related disasters has declined by 15 percent since 2000, as the earth has modestly warmed.
Indeed, as reported in Climate at a Glance: Drought, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports with “high confidence” that precipitation has increased over mid-latitude land areas of the Northern Hemisphere (including the United States) during the past 70 years.
IPCC also has “low confidence” about any negative precipitation trends occurring globally.
Moreover, the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reports America is currently is undergoing its longest period in recorded history with less than 40 percent of the country experiencing “very dry” conditions.
Also, the United States in 2017 – and then again in 2019 – registered its smallest percentage of land area experiencing drought.
Because drought is a primary climate component that would affect wildfires, it is not surprising to find real-world data show the number of wildfires and acres burned has fallen in recent decades, as well.
As reported in Climate at a Glance: Wildfires, long-term data from the U.S. National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) show wildfires have dramatically declined in number and severity in recent decades.
Reporting data on U.S. wildfires from as far back as 1926, NIFC documents that the number of acres annually burned recently is only1/4th to 1/5th of the annual acres burned in the 1930s.
Globally, the data on wildfires are just as clear. In his book False Alarm, Bjorn Lomborg observes:
“There is plenty of evidence for a reduction in the level of devastation caused by fire, with satellites showing a 25 percent reduction globally in burned areas just over the past 18 years … In total, the global amount of area burned as declined by more than 540,000 square miles, from 1.9 million square miles in the early part of last century to 1.4 million square miles today.”
It is easy for the U.N.’s WMA and mainstream media outlets like PBS to make false, alarmist climate-change claims. We at Climate Realism, however, will continue to document and report the truth.
Read more at Climate Realism
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-19--Claims Of Dramatic Great Barrier Reef Loss Are False

Claims that Australia ’ s Great Barrier Reef has lost half of its coral cover between 1995 and 2017 have received global media coverage .
The stories were based on a new paper co-authored by controversial Australian researcher , Professor Terry Hughes of James Cook University .
But according to Professor Peter Ridd , a leading authority on the Great Barrier Reef , these claims are false .
According to Professor Ridd , the best data on the coral cover is taken by the Australian Institute of Marine Science ( AIMS ) , who have been measuring over 100 reefs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ data shows that coral cover fluctuates dramatically with time but there is roughly the same amount of coral today as in 1995 .
There was a huge reduction in coral cover in 2011 which was caused by two major cyclones that halved coral cover .
Cyclones have always been the major cause of temporary coral loss on the Reef.
” This is not the first time that Professor Hughes has made such claims about coral loss .
His previous study was strongly criticized by the AIMS scientists responsible for collecting and publishing the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has refused to make public the raw data upon which he made this claim , despite repeated requests .
“ This latest work by Prof Hughes needs a thorough quality-audit to test its veracity ” , says Ridd .
“ Prima facie , there are excellent grounds to treat it with great skepticism.
” Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Claims Of Dramatic Great Barrier Reef Loss Are False
Written by Dr Benny Peiser
Claims that Australia’s Great Barrier Reef has lost half of its coral cover between 1995 and 2017 have received global media coverage. The stories were based on a new paper co-authored by controversial Australian researcher, Professor Terry Hughes of James Cook University.
But according to Professor Peter Ridd, a leading authority on the Great Barrier Reef, these claims are false.
According to Professor Ridd, the best data on the coral cover is taken by the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS), who have been measuring over 100 reefs every year since 1986:
“AIMS data shows that coral cover fluctuates dramatically with time but there is roughly the same amount of coral today as in 1995. There was a huge reduction in coral cover in 2011 which was caused by two major cyclones that halved coral cover. Cyclones have always been the major cause of temporary coral loss on the Reef.”
This is not the first time that Professor Hughes has made such claims about coral loss. His previous study was strongly criticized by the AIMS scientists responsible for collecting and publishing the coral data.
Moreover, Professor Hughes has refused to make public the raw data upon which he made this claim, despite repeated requests.
“This latest work by Prof Hughes needs a thorough quality-audit to test its veracity”, says Ridd. “Prima facie, there are excellent grounds to treat it with great skepticism.”
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-20--Proof the Rothschilds Patented Covid-19 Biometric Tests in 2015 & 2017

As we ’ ve shown in previous exposes , the whole Covidiocracy is a masquerade and a simulation long prepared by The World Bank / IMF / The Rothschilds / World Economic Forum ( basically the world ’ s “ elite ” , the 0.1 % ) and their lemmings , with Rockefeller partnership .
A method is provided for acquiring and transmitting biometric data ( e.g.
, vital signs ) of a user , where the data is analyzed to determine whether the user is suffering from a viral infection , such as COVID-19 .
The method includes using @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pulse and blood oxygen saturation percentage , which is transmitted wirelessly to a smartphone .
To ensure that the data is accurate , an accelerometer within the smartphone is used to measure movement of the smartphone and/or the user .
Once accurate data is acquired , it is uploaded to the cloud ( or host ) , where the data is used ( alone or together with other vital signs ) to determine whether the user is suffering from ( or likely to suffer from ) a viral infection , such as COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the data , changes thereto , and/or the determination can be used to alert medical staff and take corresponding actions .
ONE KEY DETAIL STRUCK ME ON THESE REGISTRATIONS : Both were filed and updated years ago , but they were SCHEDULED to be made public in September 2020 .
This is sufficient evidence that they knew in 2015 what ’ s going to happen in September 2020 !
So how did Mr. Richard A. Rothschild know to create a system and method for testing for a disease that didn ’ t exist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will be called , including the year in which the disease will be discovered ?
Another Bombshell Fact : Millions Of COVID-19 Test Kits Have Been Sold In 2017 And 2018 Data from the World Integrated Trade Solution , however , shows something astonishing : “ in 2017 and 2018 – two years before COVID-19 – hundreds of millions of test kits for COVID-19 were distributed worldwide.
” Two years before the outbreak of COVID-19 the USA , the EU , China and nations around the world started exporting millions of diagnostic test @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supposedly didn ’ t even exist back then .
None of the above makes sense , unless this is not actually a pandemic , but a PLANdemic .
And I think the following article proves just that : Ultimate Proof : Covid-19 Was Planned to Usher in the New World Order .
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Proof the Rothschilds Patented Covid-19 Biometric Tests in 2015 & 2017
Written by Silviu Costinescu
As we’ve shown in previous exposes, the whole Covidiocracy is a masquerade and a simulation long prepared by The World Bank / IMF / The Rothschilds / World Economic Forum (basically the world’s “elite”, the 0.1%) and their lemmings, with Rockefeller partnership.
First Registration: Netherlands, 2015
A method is provided for acquiring and transmitting biometric data (e.g., vital signs) of a user, where the data is analyzed to determine whether the user is suffering from a viral infection, such as COVID-19.
The method includes using a pulse oximeter to acquire at least pulse and blood oxygen saturation percentage, which is transmitted wirelessly to a smartphone.
To ensure that the data is accurate, an accelerometer within the smartphone is used to measure movement of the smartphone and/or the user.
Once accurate data is acquired, it is uploaded to the cloud (or host), where the data is used (alone or together with other vital signs) to determine whether the user is suffering from (or likely to suffer from) a viral infection, such as COVID-19.
Depending on the specific requirements, the data, changes thereto, and/or the determination can be used to alert medical staff and take corresponding actions.
Second Registration: USA, 2017
Detailed info below. ONE KEY DETAIL STRUCK ME ON THESE REGISTRATIONS: Both were filed and updated years ago, but they were SCHEDULED to be made public in September 2020. This is sufficient evidence that they knew in 2015 what’s going to happen in September 2020! So how did Mr. Richard A. Rothschild know to create a system and method for testing for a disease that didn’t exist, and know exactly how the disease will be called, including the year in which the disease will be discovered? Another Bombshell Fact: Millions Of COVID-19 Test Kits Have Been Sold In 2017 And 2018 Data from the World Integrated Trade Solution, however, shows something astonishing: “in 2017 and 2018 – two years before COVID-19 – hundreds of millions of test kits for COVID-19 were distributed worldwide.” Two years before the outbreak of COVID-19 the USA, the EU, China and nations around the world started exporting millions of diagnostic test instruments for… COVID-19, a disease that supposedly didn’t even exist back then. None of the above makes sense, unless this is not actually a pandemic, but a PLANdemic. And I think the following article proves just that: Ultimate Proof: Covid-19 Was Planned to Usher in the New World Order. Read more at: HumansAreFree.com Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-20--Elon Musk: Mars trip possible in 4 years

SpaceX is almost ready to start building a permanent human settlement on Mars with its massive Starship rocket .
The private spaceflight company is on track to launch its first uncrewed mission to Mars in as little as four years from now , SpaceX ’ s founder and CEO Elon Musk said Friday ( Oct. 16 ) at the International Mars Society Convention .
“ I think we have a fighting chance of making that second Mars transfer window , ” Musk said in a discussion with Mars Society founder Robert Zubrin .
You can watch a replay of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to is a launch opportunity that arises every 26 months for mission to Mars .
NASA , China and the United Arab Emirates all launched missions to mars in July of this year .
The next window opens in 2022 with Musk referring to the 2024 Mars launch opportunity .
The mission will launch to the Red Planet on a SpaceX Starship vehicle , a reusable rocket-and-spacecraft combo that is currently under development at the company ’ s South Texas facility .
SpaceX is also planning to use Starship for missions to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as point-to-point trips around the Earth .
Musk has long said that humans need to establish a permanent and self-sustaining presence on Mars to ensure “ the continuance of consciousness as we know it ” — just in case planet Earth is left uninhabitable by a something like a nuclear war or an asteroid strike .
But SpaceX doesn ’ t have any plans to actually build a Mars base .
As a transportation company , its only goal is to ferry cargo ( and humans ) to and from the Red Planet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s Mars base .
“ SpaceX is taking on the biggest single challenge , which is the transportation system .
There ’ s all sorts of other systems that are going to be needed , ” Mars Society founder Robert Zubrin said during the convention .
“ My personal hope is that we ’ re gon na see Starship in the stratosphere before this year ’ s out , and if Elon is right , reach orbit next year or the year after , ” Zubrin added .
“ This will change @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is possible .
And then , you know , we ’ ll have NASA seeking to fund the remaining pieces of the puzzle or entrepreneurs stepping forward to develop remaining pieces of the puzzle.
” If Musk ’ s projections are correct — he is known for offering overly ambitious timelines — SpaceX ’ s first Mars mission would launch in the same year that NASA astronauts return to the moon under the Artemis program .
SpaceX is also planning to fly space tourists on a Starship mission around the moon in 2023 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one of three commercial teams to develop moon landers for the Artemis program .
Musk said Friday that if it weren ’ t for the orbital mechanics that call for Mars launches every 26 months , SpaceX “ would maybe have a shot of sending or trying send something to Mars in three years , ” Musk said , adding that Earth and Mars won ’ t be in the best position .
“ But the window is four years away , because of them being in different parts of the solar system.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ s Starship plans in 2016 .
The project aims to launch a 165-foot ( 50 meters ) spacecraft atop a massive booster for deep-space missions to the moon , Mars and elsewhere .
Both the Starship and its Super Heavy booster will be reusable .
This year , SpaceX launched two test flights of Starship prototypes , called SN5 and SN6 , from its Boca Chica test site in Texas .
Those flights reached an altitude of 500 feet ( 150 meters ) .
SpaceX is currently preparing another Starship prototype , called @ @ @ @ @ @ @ kilometers ) test flight in the near future .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Elon Musk: Mars trip possible in 4 years
Written by Hanneke Weitering
SpaceX is almost ready to start building a permanent human settlement on Mars with its massive Starship rocket.
The private spaceflight company is on track to launch its first uncrewed mission to Mars in as little as four years from now, SpaceX’s founder and CEO Elon Musk said Friday (Oct. 16) at the International Mars Society Convention.
“I think we have a fighting chance of making that second Mars transfer window,” Musk said in a discussion with Mars Society founder Robert Zubrin. You can watch a replay of the talk here.
That window Musk referred to is a launch opportunity that arises every 26 months for mission to Mars. NASA, China and the United Arab Emirates all launched missions to mars in July of this year. The next window opens in 2022 with Musk referring to the 2024 Mars launch opportunity.
The mission will launch to the Red Planet on a SpaceX Starship vehicle, a reusable rocket-and-spacecraft combo that is currently under development at the company’s South Texas facility. SpaceX is also planning to use Starship for missions to the moon starting in 2022, as well as point-to-point trips around the Earth.
Musk has long said that humans need to establish a permanent and self-sustaining presence on Mars to ensure “the continuance of consciousness as we know it” — just in case planet Earth is left uninhabitable by a something like a nuclear war or an asteroid strike.
But SpaceX doesn’t have any plans to actually build a Mars base. As a transportation company, its only goal is to ferry cargo (and humans) to and from the Red Planet, facilitating the development of someone else’s Mars base.
“SpaceX is taking on the biggest single challenge, which is the transportation system. There’s all sorts of other systems that are going to be needed,” Mars Society founder Robert Zubrin said during the convention.
“My personal hope is that we’re gonna see Starship in the stratosphere before this year’s out, and if Elon is right, reach orbit next year or the year after,” Zubrin added. “This will change people’s minds as to what is possible. And then, you know, we’ll have NASA seeking to fund the remaining pieces of the puzzle or entrepreneurs stepping forward to develop remaining pieces of the puzzle.”
This SpaceX infographic shows how the company aims to use its Starship interstellar spacecraft to transport humans and cargo to and from the Red Planet. (Image credit: SpaceX)
If Musk’s projections are correct — he is known for offering overly ambitious timelines — SpaceX’s first Mars mission would launch in the same year that NASA astronauts return to the moon under the Artemis program. SpaceX is also planning to fly space tourists on a Starship mission around the moon in 2023. NASA has also picked SpaceX as one of three commercial teams to develop moon landers for the Artemis program.
Musk said Friday that if it weren’t for the orbital mechanics that call for Mars launches every 26 months, SpaceX “would maybe have a shot of sending or trying send something to Mars in three years,” Musk said, adding that Earth and Mars won’t be in the best position. “But the window is four years away, because of them being in different parts of the solar system.”
Musk unveiled plans for SpaceX’s Starship plans in 2016. The project aims to launch a 165-foot (50 meters) spacecraft atop a massive booster for deep-space missions to the moon, Mars and elsewhere. Both the Starship and its Super Heavy booster will be reusable.
This year, SpaceX launched two test flights of Starship prototypes, called SN5 and SN6, from its Boca Chica test site in Texas. Those flights reached an altitude of 500 feet (150 meters).
SpaceX is currently preparing another Starship prototype, called SN8, for a 12-mile-high (20 kilometers) test flight in the near future.
Read more at www.space.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-20--Fact Sheet on Vaccines: The Truth

Fact Sheet on Vaccines: The Truth

I have been demonised as an ` anti-vaxxer ’ simple because I have published criticisms showing how and when vaccines can be dangerous and ineffective .
I believe it is important to study the risk/value ratio for any medicine .
If you ’ re giving a drug to a patient who is dying then risks and side effects are less significant than if you ’ re giving a drug for a relatively minor illness .
Vaccines are usually given to healthy patients , and so it is important that the risks are very small , and side effects preferably transient @ @ @ @ @ @ @ modern vaccines are neither safe nor effective .
Pro-vaxxers steadfastly and obsessively believe that all vaccinations are safe and effective all the time .
This is patently not true .
The World Health Organisation has admitted that the vaccines pushed by the WHO and Bill Gates have caused a polio outbreak in Sudan with several children now paralysed as a result .
Here are some more facts about vaccines which your government ( and pro-vaxx journalists ) may have forgotten to tell you… • Some vaccines ( such as those administered nasally ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
These viruses may sometimes become live and can mutate .
In 2016 , the Center for Disease Control in the USA , withdrew the nasal flu vaccine because it was not effective .
Nasal vaccines can cause serious neurological and behavioural side effects .
• Making a vaccine in a few months instead of many years massively increases the dangers .
Some serious side effects do not appear for years after vaccination .
Giving a relatively untested vaccine to seven billion people ( as is planned with the covid-19 vaccine ) may @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being made seriously ill. • The H1N1 flu vaccine resulted in lawsuits all over the world .
The British Medical Journal has reported that months before serious side effects were reported , both the manufacturer and public health officials knew about the danger .
• GlaxoSmithKline ( one of the drug companies making a covid-19 vaccine ) has been fined many times .
For example , after pleading guilty to federal criminal offences GSK agreed to pay a fine of $ 3 billion .
The largest health care fraud in US history .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ for bribery in China .
There is a list of some of the fines paid by GSK on www.vernoncoleman .
com • The British Government paid out £60 million to patients who had been damaged by GSK ’ s Pandemrix vaccine .
( GSK had demanded that the Government indemnify it against claims for damages ) .
The British Government has to pay out so much money to the parents of children damaged by some vaccines that there is a fixed fee of £120,000 per severely damaged child .
In the United States @ @ @ @ @ @ @ $ 4 billion for vaccine injuries .
That money has been paid to 18,000 individuals .
That ’ s a lot of money for governments to pay out for treatments that are supposed to be perfectly safe .
In the 2019 fiscal year , $ 131,485,775 was paid out to vaccine damaged individuals in compensation .
• The UK ’ s Chief Scientific Officer , Sir Patrick Vallance , worked for GSK between 2006 and 2018 .
By the time he left , he was a member of the board .
Vallance is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
• Other vaccine manufacturers also have a terrible safety record .
Astra Zeneca is also preparing a vaccine for covid-19 .
There is a list of fines paid by Astra Zeneca on www.vernoncoleman.com .
I suggest you read the details before accepting a vaccine made by the company .
• No long-term , independent research has been done to compare the health of children who have had a full set of vaccinations against the health of children who have had no vaccinations .
Surely , if the vaccinators had faith in their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they would do ?
Pro-vaxx supporters refuse to debate the value of vaccination .
• No long-term , independent research has been done to measure the inter-reaction between vaccines and prescription drugs .
• Does repeated vaccination weaken the immune system ?
No long-term , independent research has been done to measure the effect of vaccination on the immune system .
• No research has been done to check whether giving so many vaccines to small children causes health problems .
• Patients who suffer from serious side effects after a covid-19 vaccination @ @ @ @ @ @ @ action for damages .
Drug companies , governments and doctors are all protected from litigation – even if patients are paralysed for life.Dr Vernon Coleman , a former GP , is the author of many international bestselling books including Anyone Who Tells You Vaccines Are Safe and Effective is Lying ( Here ’ s the Proof ) which is available on Amazon as an eBook and a paperback .
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 About the author : Andy Rowlands is a British Principia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who co-edited the new climate science book , ‘ The Sky Dragon Slayers : Victory Lap ‘ PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Fact Sheet on Vaccines: The Truth
Written by Dr Vernon Coleman MB ChB DSc FRSA
I have been demonised as an `anti-vaxxer’ simple because I have published criticisms showing how and when vaccines can be dangerous and ineffective. I believe it is important to study the risk/value ratio for any medicine.
If you’re giving a drug to a patient who is dying then risks and side effects are less significant than if you’re giving a drug for a relatively minor illness. Vaccines are usually given to healthy patients, and so it is important that the risks are very small, and side effects preferably transient and insignificant.
Sadly, many modern vaccines are neither safe nor effective. Pro-vaxxers steadfastly and obsessively believe that all vaccinations are safe and effective all the time. This is patently not true. The World Health Organisation has admitted that the vaccines pushed by the WHO and Bill Gates have caused a polio outbreak in Sudan with several children now paralysed as a result. Here are some more facts about vaccines which your government (and pro-vaxx journalists) may have forgotten to tell you… Some vaccines (such as those administered nasally) contain millions of live but attenuated viruses. These viruses may sometimes become live and can mutate. In 2016, the Center for Disease Control in the USA, withdrew the nasal flu vaccine because it was not effective. Nasal vaccines can cause serious neurological and behavioural side effects. Making a vaccine in a few months instead of many years massively increases the dangers. Some serious side effects do not appear for years after vaccination. Giving a relatively untested vaccine to seven billion people (as is planned with the covid-19 vaccine) may result in hundreds of thousands dying or being made seriously ill. The H1N1 flu vaccine resulted in lawsuits all over the world. The British Medical Journal has reported that months before serious side effects were reported, both the manufacturer and public health officials knew about the danger. GlaxoSmithKline (one of the drug companies making a covid-19 vaccine) has been fined many times. For example, after pleading guilty to federal criminal offences GSK agreed to pay a fine of $3 billion. The largest health care fraud in US history. The company was fined $490 million for bribery in China. There is a list of some of the fines paid by GSK on www.vernoncoleman. com The British Government paid out £60 million to patients who had been damaged by GSK’s Pandemrix vaccine. (GSK had demanded that the Government indemnify it against claims for damages). The British Government has to pay out so much money to the parents of children damaged by some vaccines that there is a fixed fee of £120,000 per severely damaged child. In the United States, the Government has paid out over $4 billion for vaccine injuries. That money has been paid to 18,000 individuals. That’s a lot of money for governments to pay out for treatments that are supposed to be perfectly safe. In the 2019 fiscal year, $131,485,775 was paid out to vaccine damaged individuals in compensation. The UK’s Chief Scientific Officer, Sir Patrick Vallance, worked for GSK between 2006 and 2018. By the time he left, he was a member of the board. Vallance is enthusiastic about a new vaccine for covid-19. Other vaccine manufacturers also have a terrible safety record. Astra Zeneca is also preparing a vaccine for covid-19. There is a list of fines paid by Astra Zeneca on www.vernoncoleman.com. I suggest you read the details before accepting a vaccine made by the company. No long-term, independent research has been done to compare the health of children who have had a full set of vaccinations against the health of children who have had no vaccinations. Surely, if the vaccinators had faith in their product that would be the first research they would do? Pro-vaxx supporters refuse to debate the value of vaccination. No long-term, independent research has been done to measure the inter-reaction between vaccines and prescription drugs. Does repeated vaccination weaken the immune system? No long-term, independent research has been done to measure the effect of vaccination on the immune system. No research has been done to check whether giving so many vaccines to small children causes health problems. Patients who suffer from serious side effects after a covid-19 vaccination will not be able to take legal action for damages. Drug companies, governments and doctors are all protected from litigation – even if patients are paralysed for life.Dr Vernon Coleman, a former GP, is the author of many international bestselling books including Anyone Who Tells You Vaccines Are Safe and Effective is Lying (Here’s the Proof) which is available on Amazon as an eBook and a paperback.
Read more at www.vernoncoleman.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
About the author: Andy Rowlands is a British Principia Scientific International researcher, writer and editor who co-edited the new climate science book, ‘The Sky Dragon Slayers: Victory Lap‘
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-20--Study: Green-Energy Sources Not The ‘Panacea’ Climate Alarmists Claim

A study done by Irish and U.S.-based researchers is calling into question the efficacy of renewable energy sources such as wind and solar in dealing with the so-called climate crisis .
In fact , the study found that such energy sources are extremely costly and may be causing as much climate change as they purport to mitigate .
Entitled Energy and Climate Policy — An Evaluation of Global Climate Change Expenditure 2011-2018 , the study raises grave questions about the feasibility and cost of switching to an energy grid powered mainly by wind and solar farms .
The study also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wind and solar energy , including the negative impacts on local environments they present .
Despite spending jaw-dropping amounts of money on wind and solar power globally since 2011 , the study shows that climate alarmists and the nations that defer to them have definitely not gotten their money ’ s worth .
“ Since 2010 , the Climate Policy Initiative ( CPI ) has been publishing the annual Global Landscape of Climate Finance reports .
According to these reports , US $ 3660 billion has been spent on global climate change projects @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of this expenditure has gone to wind and solar energy .
According to world energy reports , the contribution of wind and solar to world energy consumption has increased from 0.5 % to 3 % over this period .
Meanwhile coal , oil , and gas continue to supply 85 % of the world ’ s energy consumption with hydroelectricity and nuclear providing most of the remainder.
” The study ’ s lead author Coilin OhAiseadha points out : “ It cost the world $ 2 trillion to increase the share of energy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a percent to three percent , and it took eight years to do it .
What would it cost to increase that to 100 percent ?
And how long would it take ?
” At the same time , the world was spending these ghastly amounts of money on green projects that have proven to be about as useful as a scuba diving suit in the desert , only five percent of global climate spending was used for adapting to extreme weather events and other alleged results of anthropogenic climate change .
Moreover @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and solar farms and other green energy schemes are contributing to the problem they were meant to solve or otherwise damaging the environment .
“ Ironically , given that these policies are being framed as environmentally desirable , many of the criticisms are with their environmental impacts .
Many researchers are concerned about the negative impacts that ‘ green energies ’ have on biodiversity , ” the study states .
Wind farms , for example , increase the temperature of the soil beneath them , which causes soil microbes to release more carbon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ may have some small effect on the reduction of “ human-caused ” CO2 being released into the atmosphere , their very existence might be increasing the release of CO2 from natural sources .
Solar and wind farms also require up to 100 times the land area that fossil-fuel generated electricity plants do .
Such land use can be devastating to the pristine areas of nature that environmentalists claim to care so much about .
It ’ s not just wind and solar farms that are potential sources of environmental problems .
Politicians such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and California ’ s Gavin Newsom have expressed a desire to rid the world of fossil fuel-powered automobiles and trucks .
Such a switch to electric vehicles would require a massive increase in the number of batteries used to power such vehicles .
With increased dependence on batteries as sources of power , a vast increase in the production of certain rare minerals will be needed .
The need for cobalt , neodymium , and lithium would necessarily skyrocket , which means that the environmental impacts of such mining will fall disproportionately on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we currently understand them are simply not up to the task of powering the planet — they ’ re nowhere close .
“ The average household expects their fridges and freezers to run continuously and to be able to turn on and off the lights on-demand , ” said a co-author of the study Dr. Ronan Connally .
“ Wind and solar promoters need to start admitting that they are not capable of providing this type of continuous and on-demand electricity supply on a national scale that modern societies are used to.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ solar has produced very little in return thus far .
Moreover , these so-called clean energies are not without environmental impacts , as this report clearly points out .
“ There was worldwide coverage of the conflict between the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and Dakota Access Pipeline , ” OhAiseadha said .
“ But what about the impacts of cobalt mining on indigenous peoples in the Democratic Republic of the Congo , and what about the impacts of lithium extraction on the peoples of the Atacama Desert ?
Remember the slogan they chanted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Water is life !
Well , that applies whether you ’ re Standing Rock Sioux worried about an oil spill polluting the river , or you ’ re in the Atacama Desert worried about lithium mining polluting your groundwater.
” Some new form of energy that is clean , easily available , and carbon-free may be found sometime in the future .
But until that happens , it makes no sense to keep throwing money at “ solutions ” such as wind and solar that are not practical — at least in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an existential threat — which is extremely questionable — it ’ s better to spend that money learning how to adapt to it instead of wasting it on technologies that do little to mitigate CO2 emissions and cause adverse environmental impacts of their own .
Read more at New American

Study: Green-Energy Sources Not The ‘Panacea’ Climate Alarmists Claim
Written by James Murphy
A study done by Irish and U.S.-based researchers is calling into question the efficacy of renewable energy sources such as wind and solar in dealing with the so-called climate crisis.
In fact, the study found that such energy sources are extremely costly and may be causing as much climate change as they purport to mitigate.
Entitled Energy and Climate Policy — An Evaluation of Global Climate Change Expenditure 2011-2018, the study raises grave questions about the feasibility and cost of switching to an energy grid powered mainly by wind and solar farms.
The study also points out several of the flaws of wind and solar energy, including the negative impacts on local environments they present.
Despite spending jaw-dropping amounts of money on wind and solar power globally since 2011, the study shows that climate alarmists and the nations that defer to them have definitely not gotten their money’s worth.
“Since 2010, the Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) has been publishing the annual Global Landscape of Climate Finance reports.
According to these reports, US$3660 billion has been spent on global climate change projects over the period 2011-2018.
Fifty-five percent of this expenditure has gone to wind and solar energy. According to world energy reports, the contribution of wind and solar to world energy consumption has increased from 0.5% to 3% over this period.
Meanwhile coal, oil, and gas continue to supply 85% of the world’s energy consumption with hydroelectricity and nuclear providing most of the remainder.”
The study’s lead author Coilin OhAiseadha points out: “It cost the world $2 trillion to increase the share of energy generated by solar and wind from half a percent to three percent, and it took eight years to do it. What would it cost to increase that to 100 percent? And how long would it take?”
At the same time, the world was spending these ghastly amounts of money on green projects that have proven to be about as useful as a scuba diving suit in the desert, only five percent of global climate spending was used for adapting to extreme weather events and other alleged results of anthropogenic climate change.
Moreover, the study also found that wind and solar farms and other green energy schemes are contributing to the problem they were meant to solve or otherwise damaging the environment.
“Ironically, given that these policies are being framed as environmentally desirable, many of the criticisms are with their environmental impacts. Many researchers are concerned about the negative impacts that ‘green energies’ have on biodiversity,” the study states.
Wind farms, for example, increase the temperature of the soil beneath them, which causes soil microbes to release more carbon dioxide.
So, while wind farms may have some small effect on the reduction of “human-caused” CO2 being released into the atmosphere, their very existence might be increasing the release of CO2 from natural sources.
Solar and wind farms also require up to 100 times the land area that fossil-fuel generated electricity plants do. Such land use can be devastating to the pristine areas of nature that environmentalists claim to care so much about.
It’s not just wind and solar farms that are potential sources of environmental problems. Politicians such as the U.K.’s Boris Johnson and California’s Gavin Newsom have expressed a desire to rid the world of fossil fuel-powered automobiles and trucks.
Such a switch to electric vehicles would require a massive increase in the number of batteries used to power such vehicles.
With increased dependence on batteries as sources of power, a vast increase in the production of certain rare minerals will be needed.
The need for cobalt, neodymium, and lithium would necessarily skyrocket, which means that the environmental impacts of such mining will fall disproportionately on some impoverished countries.
Renewable energies as we currently understand them are simply not up to the task of powering the planet — they’re nowhere close.
“The average household expects their fridges and freezers to run continuously and to be able to turn on and off the lights on-demand,” said a co-author of the study Dr. Ronan Connally.
“Wind and solar promoters need to start admitting that they are not capable of providing this type of continuous and on-demand electricity supply on a national scale that modern societies are used to.”
The massive worldwide investment in wind and solar has produced very little in return thus far. Moreover, these so-called clean energies are not without environmental impacts, as this report clearly points out.
“There was worldwide coverage of the conflict between the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and Dakota Access Pipeline,” OhAiseadha said.
“But what about the impacts of cobalt mining on indigenous peoples in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and what about the impacts of lithium extraction on the peoples of the Atacama Desert? Remember the slogan they chanted at Standing Rock? Mni Wiconi! Water is life! Well, that applies whether you’re Standing Rock Sioux worried about an oil spill polluting the river, or you’re in the Atacama Desert worried about lithium mining polluting your groundwater.”
Some new form of energy that is clean, easily available, and carbon-free may be found sometime in the future.
But until that happens, it makes no sense to keep throwing money at “solutions” such as wind and solar that are not practical — at least in the short term.
If climate change is an existential threat — which is extremely questionable — it’s better to spend that money learning how to adapt to it instead of wasting it on technologies that do little to mitigate CO2 emissions and cause adverse environmental impacts of their own.
Read more at New American
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-20--New Study: E. Antarctica Was Up To 6°C Warmer 1,000 To 2,000 Years Ago

New Study : E. Antarctica Was Up To 6°C Warmer 1,000 To 2,000 Years Ago As recently as 2,000 to 1,000 years ago , spanning the Roman to Medieval Warm Periods , East Antarctica was 5-6°C warmer than it is today .
The consequent ice melt resulted in > 60 meters higher water levels in East Antarctica ’ s lakes .
East Antarctica has been rapidly cooling in recent decades , with magnitudes reaching -0.7°C to -2.0°C per decade since the mid-1980s ( Obryk et al.
, 2020 ) .
A new study ( Myers et al.
, 2020 ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and throughout the Last Glacial Maximum , East Antarctica was 4-9°C colder than it is today .
Antarctica then abruptly warmed 15°C within centuries .
From 12,000 to 6,000 years before the present , East Antarctica was about 5°C warmer than it is today .
And then as recently as 2,000 to 1,000 years ago , East Antarctica was so warm ( ~6°C warmer than present ) that its lakes were filled with 60 to 80 meters more meltwater than exists in lake basins today .
“ Resistivity data suggests that active permafrost @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of lake drainage , and that as recently as 1,000 – 1,500 yr BP , lake levels were over 60 m higher than present .
This coincides with a warmer than modern paleoclimate throughout the Holocene inferred by the nearby Taylor Dome ice core record .
… Stable isotope records from Taylor Dome ( located roughly 100 km west of the MDVs ) indicate mean annual air temperatures ca .
4-9 °C lower than modern during the LGM ( Steig et al.
, 2000 ) .
” “ Between 12,000–6,000 yr BP , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ regional temperatures were up to 5 °C warmer than modern conditions ( Fig .
2 ) ( Steig et al.
, 2000 ) .
” “ Permafrost age calculations indicate late Holocene lake level high-stands ( up to ~81 masl , 63 m higher than modern Lake Fryxell ) roughly 1.5 to 1 ka BP that would have filled both Lake Fryxell and Lake Hoare basins ( Fig .
3b ) .
… Taylor Dome ice core records show a highly variable Holocene , with short lived peaks up to + 6 °C @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( Steig et al.
, 2000 ) .
” “ Lake levels were higher potentially during and after the LGM when an ice dam blocked the mouth of TV , allowing for lake levels to increase by over 280 m compared to modern level .
Taylor Dome ice core records indicate an abrupt warming of > 15 °C from 15 – 12 ka BP , ( Steig et al.
, 2000 ) , which may have coincided with the maximum lake level of GLW.
” “ Short lived changes in temperature such as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Holocene could have resulted in anywhere between 60 to 80 m of lake level rise and subsequent drawdown.
” This substantial regional warmth can also be verified by the 1,000-year-old elephant seal remains that document a time when Antarctica was sea-ice-free 2,400 kilometers south of where sea-ice-free conditions occur today ( Koch et al.
, 2019 ) .
Elephant seals require sea-ice-free conditions to breed , and the same locations where they used to breed during the Medieval Warm Period are today buried in sea ice .
Read more at No Tricks Zone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

New Study: E. Antarctica Was Up To 6°C Warmer 1,000 To 2,000 Years Ago
Written by Kenneth Richard
As recently as 2,000 to 1,000 years ago, spanning the Roman to Medieval Warm Periods, East Antarctica was 5-6°C warmer than it is today. The consequent ice melt resulted in >60 meters higher water levels in East Antarctica’s lakes.
East Antarctica has been rapidly cooling in recent decades, with magnitudes reaching -0.7°C to -2.0°C per decade since the mid-1980s (Obryk et al., 2020).
A new study (Myers et al., 2020) reports that until about 15,000 years ago and throughout the Last Glacial Maximum, East Antarctica was 4-9°C colder than it is today.
Antarctica then abruptly warmed 15°C within centuries. From 12,000 to 6,000 years before the present, East Antarctica was about 5°C warmer than it is today.
And then as recently as 2,000 to 1,000 years ago, East Antarctica was so warm (~6°C warmer than present) that its lakes were filled with 60 to 80 meters more meltwater than exists in lake basins today.
“Resistivity data suggests that active permafrost formation has been ongoing since the onset of lake drainage, and that as recently as 1,000 – 1,500 yr BP, lake levels were over 60 m higher than present. This coincides with a warmer than modern paleoclimate throughout the Holocene inferred by the nearby Taylor Dome ice core record. … Stable isotope records from Taylor Dome (located roughly 100 km west of the MDVs) indicate mean annual air temperatures ca. 4-9 °C lower than modern during the LGM (Steig et al., 2000).” “Between 12,000–6,000 yr BP, Taylor Dome ice core record indicates that regional temperatures were up to 5 °C warmer than modern conditions (Fig. 2) (Steig et al., 2000).” “Permafrost age calculations indicate late Holocene lake level high-stands (up to ~81 masl, 63 m higher than modern Lake Fryxell) roughly 1.5 to 1 ka BP that would have filled both Lake Fryxell and Lake Hoare basins (Fig. 3b). … Taylor Dome ice core records show a highly variable Holocene, with short lived peaks up to + 6 °C above modern temperatures between 1-2 ka BP (Steig et al., 2000).” “Lake levels were higher potentially during and after the LGM when an ice dam blocked the mouth of TV, allowing for lake levels to increase by over 280 m compared to modern level. Taylor Dome ice core records indicate an abrupt warming of >15 °C from 15 – 12 ka BP, (Steig et al., 2000), which may have coincided with the maximum lake level of GLW.” “Short lived changes in temperature such as a 6 °C increase in the late Holocene could have resulted in anywhere between 60 to 80 m of lake level rise and subsequent drawdown.”
This substantial regional warmth can also be verified by the 1,000-year-old elephant seal remains that document a time when Antarctica was sea-ice-free 2,400 kilometers south of where sea-ice-free conditions occur today (Koch et al., 2019).
Elephant seals require sea-ice-free conditions to breed, and the same locations where they used to breed during the Medieval Warm Period are today buried in sea ice.
Read more at No Tricks Zone
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-20--RIP Niklas Mörner: 1938-2020

RIP Niklas Mörner: 1938-2020

It was a privilege and honor to have as my friend and colleague , Niklas Mörner .
It is with regret to share the sad news of his passing .
Over the past 10 years Niklas was prominent in the movement to expose the man-made global warming fraud , but especially the lies told by corrupt academics and ‘ science ’ institutions about ‘ dangerous ’ sea level rise .
He was known as a principled scientist and inspiration to many who were fortunate to work with Niklas .
In particular , I fondly recall he was always supportive of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Principia Scientific International and everyone here who worked with him only had praise for his dedication , thoroughness and professionalism .
“ Nils-Axel Mörner was the former head of the paleogeophysics and geodynamics department at Stockholm University .
He retired in 2005 .
He was president of the International Union for Quaternary Research Commission on Neotectonics .
He headed the INTAS Project on geomagnetism and climate .
He was a critic of the IPCC and the notion that the global sea level is rising.
” No one did more to expose the shocking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ due to man-made global warming .
Of much significance was his 2007 20-page booklet The Greatest Lie Ever Told .
Our friend and PSI colleague , Professor Cliff Ollier wrote an excellent review of the booklet here .
“ Mörner asserts that climate changes between 1850 and 1970 were predominantly a function of solar variability…..This little booklet shows how a bandwagon works , and offers a few things that might help to put the brakes on this particular , rising sea level bandwagon .
It is also a sad commentary on how science @ @ @ @ @ @ @ writes a tribute to Niklas many of us heartily share : “ We must raise our game and work to honour the memory of this bright , brave and brilliant man .
The energy and clarity of purpose he brought to science is an inspiration to us all .
The humour and kind hearted cameraderie he exuded bound all the events we organised together .
His enthusiasm was infectious , his expertise unparalleled in his field .
His ability to engage audiences and communicate complex topics in a way that left participants with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the sword of truth with grace.
” “ The day you close your ears you are gone ” **** PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

RIP Niklas Mörner: 1938-2020
Written by John O'Sullivan
It was a privilege and honor to have as my friend and colleague, Niklas Mörner. It is with regret to share the sad news of his passing.
Over the past 10 years Niklas was prominent in the movement to expose the man-made global warming fraud, but especially the lies told by corrupt academics and ‘science’ institutions about ‘dangerous’ sea level rise.
He was known as a principled scientist and inspiration to many who were fortunate to work with Niklas. In particular, I fondly recall he was always supportive of our mission to set up and grow Principia Scientific International and everyone here who worked with him only had praise for his dedication, thoroughness and professionalism.
As Wikipedia’s entry reports:
“Nils-Axel Mörner was the former head of the paleogeophysics and geodynamics department at Stockholm University. He retired in 2005. He was president of the International Union for Quaternary Research Commission on Neotectonics. He headed the INTAS Project on geomagnetism and climate. He was a critic of the IPCC and the notion that the global sea level is rising.”
No one did more to expose the shocking fraud about claims of sea level rise due to man-made global warming. Of much significance was his 2007 20-page booklet The Greatest Lie Ever Told.
Our friend and PSI colleague, Professor Cliff Ollier wrote an excellent review of the booklet here.
Professor Ollier writes:
“Mörner asserts that climate changes between 1850 and 1970 were predominantly a function of solar variability…..This little booklet shows how a bandwagon works, and offers a few things that might help to put the brakes on this particular, rising sea level bandwagon. It is also a sad commentary on how science is manipulated these days.”
Tallbloke here writes a tribute to Niklas many of us heartily share:
“We must raise our game and work to honour the memory of this bright, brave and brilliant man. The energy and clarity of purpose he brought to science is an inspiration to us all. The humour and kind hearted cameraderie he exuded bound all the events we organised together. His enthusiasm was infectious, his expertise unparalleled in his field. His ability to engage audiences and communicate complex topics in a way that left participants with new insight is legendary. He swung the sword of truth with grace.”
“The day you close your ears you are gone”
****
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related