principiascientificinternational--2020-05-19--Effective CV-19 Treatments Exist But Elderly Still Left to Die

Effective CV-19 Treatments Exist But Elderly Still Left to Die “ Our loved ones need not die so Fauci and Gates can have their moment in the sun with a vaccine next year.
” THE STUDIES OUT OF CHINA were clear : hydroxychloroquine improved health outcomes of patients with COVID-19 .
French study ?
The same .
In the hands of US scientists ?
Maybe , but they are not studying it on the full population like the Chinese scientists did , they moved the goalpost ( changed the health outcome during the trial ) , and they used smaller @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
Gilead announced early promising results , and so what does NIAID do ?
They shut down that trial .
How about plasma convalescent therapy , where survivors donate their antibodies for other people to recover more quickly , have lower rates of serious and critical illness , lower hospitalization rates , and lower deaths ?
Did you know FDA recommends it for people who can not have access to it in a clinical trial ?
You won ’ t hear about other efficacy studies from China , and you won ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ oxygen therapy .
You won ’ t hear about the multicenter guidance consensus statement published recommending use of antivirals in serious pediatric cases of COVID-19 .
And of course you won ’ t hear about the < 2 % hospitalization rate achieved by the preeminent Dr. David Btownstein with his high-dose vitamin regimen either , since FTC shut down his website in which he published direct interviews of patients under his care .
No deaths , and the FTC shut it down .
So , we ’ re launching a case series study @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to a study submitted to a clinical journal for peer review .
[ Go to ipaknowledge.org now to support – see How to Donate ) .
In smaller , less powered US government-related studies , hydroxychloroquine seems to lose its efficacy , and the US touts the results as more definitive than the larger , more powered studies that previously did report efficacy .
Now why would the US medico-government shut down studies and reports of treatment options that reduce the rate of serious and critical illness and death ?
Could it be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rate to warrant continued lock-down as a justification for their vaccine ?
Kinda makes you wonder , doesn ’ t it .
The US medico-government is willing to allow people nursing homes to die with zero – ZERO intervention – not even a glass of orange juice for the Vitamin C – no compassionate use of hydroxychloroquine + Zpak , no attempts at remdesivir , no attempts at plasma convalescent therapy , no universal open-label retrospective study like are applied to vaccines all the time , well , they are simply allowing nursing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an outright passive , but nonetheless willfull , massacre .
Most of the practicing and licensed physicians I know would never sit by idly and watch a patient deteriorate and do nothing , and follow up with ventilator that blows out their patients ’ lung tissues after the virus has weaked the alveoli to the periphery .
They would join me the condemnation of the ongoing willful massacre of our elderly in nursing homes around the country .
Wake up , America .
Here is the list of studies and web resources the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ don ’ t want you to know about .
On March 28 , the FDA issued an emergency use authorization allowing healthcare providers to make available chloroquine phosphate or hydroxychloroquine sulfate to “ patients for whom a clinical trial is not available , or participation is not feasible , ” adding “ FDA encourages the conduct and participation in randomized controlled clinical trials that may produce evidence concerning the effectiveness of these products in treating COVID-19.
” So where are the treatments for the elderly ?
My advice to people ?
Keep mom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hell away from nursing homes .
If they are already there , get a lawyer and demand they be tested , and if negative for active infection , get them out .
If they are already infected , send the lawyer this article and have them issue a letter of a threat of a lawsuit for wrongful death and malpractice for the attending physician .
And start clamoring for criminal negligence against the Board of Directors of the nursing home .
Our loved ones need not die so Fauci and Gates can have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine next year .
Do you have other studies that support the use of these or other treatments to add ?
Drop them in the comments , with a link .
[ 1 ] Thibodeax , K et al .
2020 .
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in preventing mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients : a retrospective case series .
J Wound Care 2020 May 1 ; 29 ( Sup5a ) : S4-S8 .
doi : 10.12968/jowc.2020.29.Sup5a.S4 .
https : //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32412891 Highlight : “ All the patients recovered without the need for mechanical ventilation .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ tachypnoea resolved and inflammatory markers fell.
” [ 2 ] Gilead Announces Results From Phase 3 Trial of Investigational Antiviral Remdesivir in Patients With Severe COVID-19 — Study Demonstrates Similar Efficacy with 5- and 10-Day Dosing Durations of Remdesivir — https : //www.gilead.com/news-and-press/press-room/press-releases/2020/4/gilead-announces-results-from-phase-3-trial-of-investigational-antiviral-remdesivir-in-patients-with-severe-covid-19 Highlight : “ The study demonstrated that patients receiving a 10-day treatment course of remdesivir achieved similar improvement in clinical status compared with those taking a 5-day treatment course ( Odds Ratio : 0.75 [ 95 % CI 0.51 – 1.12 ] on Day 14 ) .
No new safety @ @ @ @ @ @ @ treatment group.
” Patients : Severe manifestations of COVID-19 disease .
Inclusion criteria was pneumonia and reduced oxygen levels that did not require mechanical ventilation at the time of study .
Overall mortality rate 7 % .
[ 3 ] NIH Clinical Trial Shows Remdesivir Accelerates Recovery from Advanced COVID-19 | NIH : National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Highlight : “ Hospitalized patients with advanced COVID-19 and lung involvement who received remdesivir recovered faster than similar patients who received placebo.
” [ 4 ] Inside the NIH ’ s controversial decision @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : //www.statnews.com/2020/05/11/inside-the-nihs-controversial-decision-to-stop-its-big-remdesivir-study/ [ 5 ] Compassionate Use Example , Colorado , USA ( Remdesivir ) Firstenberg , 2020 .
Successful COVID-19 rescue therapy by extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation ( ECMO ) for respiratory failure : a case report Patient Saf Surg 2020 May 8 14:20 https : //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32395179 Triple-drug combo of anti-malaria pill hydroxychloroquine , azithromycin and ZINC improved coronavirus patients ’ chances of being discharged and cut death risk by almost 50 % , study finds Highlight : “ Results showed that patients receiving the triple-drug combination had a 1.5 times greater likelihood @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Highlight : “ …an increased frequency of being discharged home ( OR 1.53 , 95 % CI 1.12-2.09 ) reduction in mortality or transfer to hospice ( was ) significant ( OR 0.449 , 95 % CI 0.271-0.744 ) ” [ 6 ] Gautret et al.
, linical and microbiological effect of a combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin in 80 COVID-19 patients with at least a six-day follow up : A pilot observational study.Travel Med Infect Disease 2020 Mar-Apr 24 : 101663 : doi : 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101663 .
Epub 2020 Apr 11. https : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clinically except one 86 year-old patient who died , and one 74 year-old patient still in intensive care .
A rapid fall of nasopharyngeal viral load was noted , with 83 % negative at Day7 , and 93 % at Day8 .
Virus cultures from patient respiratory samples were negative in 97.5 % of patients at Day5 .
Consequently patients were able to be rapidly discharged from IDU with a mean length of stay of five days.
” [ 7 ] Chen et al.
, 2020 .
Efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trial MedRxiv https : //www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.22.20040758v3 [ 8 ] Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19 : results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial.. Intl J Antimicrobial Agents Online March 20 , 2020 , 105949 https : //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857920300996 [ 9 ] Joyner et al.
, 2020 .
Early Safety Indicators of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma in 5,000 Patients MedRxiv Preprint https : //www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.12.20099879v1.full.pdf [ 10 ] US FDA , May 1 , 2020 .
Recommendations for Investigational COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma https : //www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/investigational-new-drug-ind-or-device-exemption-ide-process-cber/recommendations-investigational-covid-19-convalescent-plasma [ 11 ] Chiotos et al.
, 2020 .
Multicenter initial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 .
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2020 Apr 22 : piaa045 .
Published online 2020 Apr 22. doi : 10.1093/jpids/piaa045 PMCID : PMC7188128 https : //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7188128/ Highlight : “ Supportive care may be appropriate for children who are severely ill with coronavirus disease 2019 .
Use of potentially active antivirals should be considered , preferably as part of a clinical trial if available ” [ 12 ] Shen , K. 2020 .
Diagnosis , treatment , and prevention of 2019 novel coronavirus infection in children : experts ’ consensus statement .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ 10.1007/s12519-020-00343-7 .
https : //link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12519-020-00343-7.pdf [ 13 ] Where ’ s the data ?
In a pandemic , now is no time to sit on Covid-19 trial results https : //www.statnews.com/2020/05/13/wheres-the-data-in-a-pandemic-now-is-no-time-to-sit-on-covid-19-trial-results/ PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Effective CV-19 Treatments Exist But Elderly Still Left to Die
Written by James Lyons-Weiler PhD
“Our loved ones need not die so Fauci and Gates can have their moment in the sun with a vaccine next year.”
THE STUDIES OUT OF CHINA were clear: hydroxychloroquine improved health outcomes of patients with COVID-19. French study? The same.
In the hands of US scientists? Maybe, but they are not studying it on the full population like the Chinese scientists did, they moved the goalpost (changed the health outcome during the trial), and they used smaller (less powerful) studies.
Remdesivir? Gilead announced early promising results, and so what does NIAID do? They shut down that trial.
How about plasma convalescent therapy, where survivors donate their antibodies for other people to recover more quickly, have lower rates of serious and critical illness, lower hospitalization rates, and lower deaths? Did you know FDA recommends it for people who cannot have access to it in a clinical trial?
You won’t hear about other efficacy studies from China, and you won’t hear about the efficacy studies of hyperbaric oxygen therapy.
You won’t hear about the multicenter guidance consensus statement published recommending use of antivirals in serious pediatric cases of COVID-19.
And of course you won’t hear about the <2{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} hospitalization rate achieved by the preeminent Dr. David Btownstein with his high-dose vitamin regimen either, since FTC shut down his website in which he published direct interviews of patients under his care. No deaths, and the FTC shut it down.
So, we’re launching a case series study of his treatment regimen that will lead to a study submitted to a clinical journal for peer review. [Go to ipaknowledge.org now to support – see How to Donate).
In smaller, less powered US government-related studies, hydroxychloroquine seems to lose its efficacy, and the US touts the results as more definitive than the larger, more powered studies that previously did report efficacy.
Now why would the US medico-government shut down studies and reports of treatment options that reduce the rate of serious and critical illness and death? Could it be that they want a sufficiently high mortality rate to warrant continued lock-down as a justification for their vaccine?
Kinda makes you wonder, doesn’t it. The US medico-government is willing to allow people nursing homes to die with zero – ZERO intervention – not even a glass of orange juice for the Vitamin C – no compassionate use of hydroxychloroquine + Zpak, no attempts at remdesivir, no attempts at plasma convalescent therapy, no universal open-label retrospective study like are applied to vaccines all the time, well, they are simply allowing nursing home staff members to join them in an outright passive, but nonetheless willfull, massacre.
Most of the practicing and licensed physicians I know would never sit by idly and watch a patient deteriorate and do nothing, and follow up with ventilator that blows out their patients’ lung tissues after the virus has weaked the alveoli to the periphery. They would join me the condemnation of the ongoing willful massacre of our elderly in nursing homes around the country.
Wake up, America. Here is the list of studies and web resources the medico-fascists hell bent on a COVID-19 vaccine don’t want you to know about.
On March 28, the FDA issued an emergency use authorization allowing healthcare providers to make available chloroquine phosphate or hydroxychloroquine sulfate to “patients for whom a clinical trial is not available, or participation is not feasible,” adding “FDA encourages the conduct and participation in randomized controlled clinical trials that may produce evidence concerning the effectiveness of these products in treating COVID-19.”
So where are the treatments for the elderly?
My advice to people? Keep mom and dad, grandma and grandpa the hell away from nursing homes. If they are already there, get a lawyer and demand they be tested, and if negative for active infection, get them out. If they are already infected, send the lawyer this article and have them issue a letter of a threat of a lawsuit for wrongful death and malpractice for the attending physician.
And start clamoring for criminal negligence against the Board of Directors of the nursing home. Our loved ones need not die so Fauci and Gates can have his moment in the sun with a vaccine next year.
Do you have other studies that support the use of these or other treatments to add? Drop them in the comments, with a link.
References
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy
[1] Thibodeax, K et al. 2020. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in preventing mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients: a retrospective case series. J Wound Care 2020 May 1;29(Sup5a):S4-S8. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2020.29.Sup5a.S4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32412891
Highlight: “All the patients recovered without the need for mechanical ventilation. Following HBOT, oxygen saturation increased, tachypnoea resolved and inflammatory markers fell.”
Remdesivir
[2] Gilead Announces Results From Phase 3 Trial of Investigational Antiviral Remdesivir in Patients With Severe COVID-19 — Study Demonstrates Similar Efficacy with 5- and 10-Day Dosing Durations of Remdesivir — https://www.gilead.com/news-and-press/press-room/press-releases/2020/4/gilead-announces-results-from-phase-3-trial-of-investigational-antiviral-remdesivir-in-patients-with-severe-covid-19
Highlight: “The study demonstrated that patients receiving a 10-day treatment course of remdesivir achieved similar improvement in clinical status compared with those taking a 5-day treatment course (Odds Ratio: 0.75 [95{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} CI 0.51 – 1.12] on Day 14). No new safety signals were identified with remdesivir across either treatment group.”
Patients: Severe manifestations of COVID-19 disease. Inclusion criteria was pneumonia and reduced oxygen levels that did not require mechanical ventilation at the time of study. Overall mortality rate 7{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}.
[3] NIH Clinical Trial Shows Remdesivir Accelerates Recovery from Advanced COVID-19 | NIH: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
http://www.niaid.nih.gov/news-events/nih-clinical-trial-shows-remdesivir-accelerates-recovery-advanced-covid-19
Highlight: “Hospitalized patients with advanced COVID-19 and lung involvement who received remdesivir recovered faster than similar patients who received placebo.”
[4] Inside the NIH’s controversial decision to stop its big remdesivir study https://www.statnews.com/2020/05/11/inside-the-nihs-controversial-decision-to-stop-its-big-remdesivir-study/
[5] Compassionate Use Example, Colorado, USA (Remdesivir)
Firstenberg, 2020. Successful COVID-19 rescue therapy by extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for respiratory failure: a case report Patient Saf Surg 2020 May 8 14:20 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32395179
Combined Treatment Effective
Triple-drug combo of anti-malaria pill hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and ZINC improved coronavirus patients’ chances of being discharged and cut death risk by almost 50{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}, study finds
Highlight: “Results showed that patients receiving the triple-drug combination had a 1.5 times greater likelihood of recovering enough to be discharged.”
Highlight: “…an increased frequency of being discharged home (OR 1.53, 95{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} CI 1.12-2.09) reduction in mortality or transfer to hospice (was) significant (OR 0.449, 95{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} CI 0.271-0.744)”
Study link: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.02.20080036v1
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-8309337/Zinc-hydroxychloroquine-effective-COVID-19-patients-study.html
Hydroxychloroquine Phosphate
[6] Gautret et al., linical and microbiological effect of a combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin in 80 COVID-19 patients with at least a six-day follow up: A pilot observational study.Travel Med Infect Disease 2020 Mar-Apr 24: 101663: doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101663. Epub 2020 Apr 11. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32289548
Highlight: “All patients improved clinically except one 86 year-old patient who died, and one 74 year-old patient still in intensive care. A rapid fall of nasopharyngeal viral load was noted, with 83{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} negative at Day7, and 93{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} at Day8. Virus cultures from patient respiratory samples were negative in 97.5{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of patients at Day5. Consequently patients were able to be rapidly discharged from IDU with a mean length of stay of five days.”
[7] Chen et al., 2020. Efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients with COVID-19: results of a randomized clinical trial MedRxiv https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.22.20040758v3
[8] Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial.. Intl J Antimicrobial Agents Online March 20, 2020, 105949 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857920300996
Plasma Convalascent Therapy
[9] Joyner et al., 2020. Early Safety Indicators of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma in 5,000 Patients MedRxiv Preprint https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.12.20099879v1.full.pdf
[10] US FDA, May 1, 2020. Recommendations for Investigational COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/investigational-new-drug-ind-or-device-exemption-ide-process-cber/recommendations-investigational-covid-19-convalescent-plasma
Consensus Statements
[11] Chiotos et al., 2020. Multicenter initial guidance on use of antivirals for children with COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2020 Apr 22 : piaa045. Published online 2020 Apr 22. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piaa045 PMCID: PMC7188128 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7188128/
Highlight: “Supportive care may be appropriate for children who are severely ill with coronavirus disease 2019. Use of potentially active antivirals should be considered, preferably as part of a clinical trial if available”
Boosting Immunity, Interferon
[12] Shen, K. 2020. Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of 2019 novel coronavirus infection in children: experts’ consensus statement. World J. Pediatric Feb 7 doi: 10.1007/s12519-020-00343-7. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12519-020-00343-7.pdf
Clinical Trials Reporting
[13] Where’s the data? In a pandemic, now is no time to sit on Covid-19 trial results https://www.statnews.com/2020/05/13/wheres-the-data-in-a-pandemic-now-is-no-time-to-sit-on-covid-19-trial-results/
Read more at jameslyonsweiler.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-19--Lethal CDC Vaccine Safety Fail: Massive Lawsuit Coming!

CDC fails to produce in court proceedings ANY studies which backed its claim that vaccines “ Do Not Cause Autism ” – therefore they intentionally and dishonestly mislead the public into taking unproven vaccines .
Hard-hitting follow up lawsuit is soon to come !
Robert F Kennedy ’ s recent court victory was so important insofar as it established the fact the CDC lied for years about something they claimed they had proven scientifically , when they had not .
The CDC were exposed for fraudulently claiming the science of vaccine safety was settled , when in reality there was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the story .
In March 2020 Robert F Kennedy ’ s successful motion was filed to force the CDC to provide the studies that prove the statement on their website “ Vaccines do not cause autism.
” They were exposed as not being entitled to make any such claim because they failed to show the court they had undertaken any safety tests .
They merely lied and deceived the public on the matter .
Cynically , the CDC had ignored Kennedy ’ s FOIAs for over a year as they did with swine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ link below show that all the CDC were finally able to provide was a mere 20 studies ( some weren ’ t even relevant ) merely to comply with the FOIA requests .
None of these documents contained any scientific evidence to back the CDC ’ s discredited safety claims .
Kennedy has made clear his team so far has been simply laying the groundwork for a much larger case to come , They have a legal strategy as yet undisclosed .
Some readers had not realized that this case was from two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but very few – beyond legal experts – recognised the huge importance of the final ruling ( see PDF link below ) .
A previous court win was the case which forced HHS to admit there had not been any safety studies submitted to Congress ( as mandated in the NCVIA 1983 ) for the past 30 years .
The mandate , which provided HHS assume legal liability from vaccine manufacturers , required a task force to be created with reports on improvements to vaccine safety every 2 years to Congress .
NEVER @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ safe and effective ” ?
?
They don ’ t have a freakin ’ clue !
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Lethal CDC Vaccine Safety Fail: Massive Lawsuit Coming!
Written by John O'Sullivan
CDC fails to produce in court proceedings ANY studies which backed its claim that vaccines “Do Not Cause Autism” – therefore they intentionally and dishonestly mislead the public into taking unproven vaccines. Hard-hitting follow up lawsuit is soon to come!
Robert F Kennedy’s recent court victory was so important insofar as it established the fact the CDC lied for years about something they claimed they had proven scientifically, when they had not.
The CDC were exposed for fraudulently claiming the science of vaccine safety was settled, when in reality there was no such science. THAT’s the story.
In March 2020 Robert F Kennedy’s successful motion was filed to force the CDC to provide the studies that prove the statement on their website “Vaccines do not cause autism.”
They were exposed as not being entitled to make any such claim because they failed to show the court they had undertaken any safety tests. They merely lied and deceived the public on the matter.
Cynically, the CDC had ignored Kennedy’s FOIAs for over a year as they did with swine flu.
The court documents in the link below show that all the CDC were finally able to provide was a mere 20 studies (some weren’t even relevant) merely to comply with the FOIA requests. None of these documents contained any scientific evidence to back the CDC’s discredited safety claims.
Kennedy has made clear his team so far has been simply laying the groundwork for a much larger case to come, They have a legal strategy as yet undisclosed.
Some readers had not realized that this case was from two months ago and had been reported on but very few – beyond legal experts – recognised the huge importance of the final ruling ( see PDF link below).
PDF (3 Pages): ICAN on CDC Failure 5 March 2020
A previous court win was the case which forced HHS to admit there had not been any safety studies submitted to Congress (as mandated in the NCVIA 1983) for the past 30 years. The mandate, which provided HHS assume legal liability from vaccine manufacturers, required a task force to be created with reports on improvements to vaccine safety every 2 years to Congress. NEVER HAPPENED! So how can vaccines be “safe and effective”?? They don’t have a freakin’ clue!
PDF (3 Pages): Stipulation-and-Order-Fully-Executed
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-20--Pandemic Modeling Fiasco Reveals Science Is Never Settled

There is a silver lining to the coronavirus fiasco , which is that the public can now see that there is no such thing as ‘ the science is settled ’ , as the man-made climate-change brigade parrot at every opportunity .
The computer model devised by Professor Neil Ferguson ’ s team at Imperial College London has been torn to shreds .
Other teams who ran it found that identical inputs resulted in different results and that running the code on different computers changed the results .
They warned the Ferguson team , who were not interested .
One @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the results of multiple runs to cover up the variation .
Imperial , we should remember , is ranked ninth-best in the world in the 2020 QS World University Rankings and tenth best in the 2020 Times Higher Education World University Rankings .
This was the crack team to which the bewildered government turned for advice , yet their ‘ science ’ appears to be have been a little better than you or I could have managed .
Why should it be any different for the ‘ science ’ of climate change ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of claims by the man-made climate change lobby that are provable rubbish .
Surely now there must be some skepticism ?
There are two problems .
First , there are none so deaf as those who do not want to hear .
For a lot of activists , the cause is their life .
Their social sphere consists solely of those with the same views .
Casting those views aside would mean turning their lives upside down .
My guess is that the social side is more important for many activists than the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are not willing to listen to any arguments which might destroy that .
The second problem is money .
Research scientists don ’ t work for free : they depend on grants either from industry or government .
Grants are not dispensed impartially : they are given to those who will try to come up with the desired result .
If a government is convinced that black is white , the available research funding will go to scientists submitting projects aligned with that idea .
If halfway through you have to admit that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that in fact , you tend to the view that black is black , you may as well forget about the second half of your grant .
In this case , as could be seen when senior politicians fawned over St Greta ( remind yourselves with this embarrassing picture ) the government has accepted that climate change , which has happened continuously over the Earth ’ s 4.5billion-year existence , can and should be reversed .
King Canute !
thou shouldst be living at this hour !
The cards have been stacked for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mob .
Maybe Neil Ferguson ’ s demonstration of the explosive effect on a reputation of spouting nonsense will give some pause for thought .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Pandemic Modeling Fiasco Reveals Science Is Never Settled
Written by Margaret Ashworth
There is a silver lining to the coronavirus fiasco, which is that the public can now see that there is no such thing as ‘the science is settled’, as the man-made climate-change brigade parrot at every opportunity.
The computer model devised by Professor Neil Ferguson’s team at Imperial College London has been torn to shreds.
Other teams who ran it found that identical inputs resulted in different results and that running the code on different computers changed the results.
They warned the Ferguson team, who were not interested.
One expert has speculated that they simply averaged the results of multiple runs to cover up the variation.
Imperial, we should remember, is ranked ninth-best in the world in the 2020 QS World University Rankings and tenth best in the 2020 Times Higher Education World University Rankings.
This was the crack team to which the bewildered government turned for advice, yet their ‘science’ appears to be have been a little better than you or I could have managed.
Why should it be any different for the ‘science’ of climate change? The Conservative Woman has carried many rebuttals of claims by the man-made climate change lobby that are provable rubbish. Surely now there must be some skepticism?
There are two problems. First, there are none so deaf as those who do not want to hear. For a lot of activists, the cause is their life.
Their social sphere consists solely of those with the same views. Casting those views aside would mean turning their lives upside down.
My guess is that the social side is more important for many activists than the facts of the case, and they are not willing to listen to any arguments which might destroy that.
The second problem is money. Research scientists don’t work for free: they depend on grants either from industry or government.
Grants are not dispensed impartially: they are given to those who will try to come up with the desired result.
If a government is convinced that black is white, the available research funding will go to scientists submitting projects aligned with that idea.
If halfway through you have to admit that you are not making much progress and that in fact, you tend to the view that black is black, you may as well forget about the second half of your grant.
In this case, as could be seen when senior politicians fawned over St Greta (remind yourselves with this embarrassing picture) the government has accepted that climate change, which has happened continuously over the Earth’s 4.5billion-year existence, can and should be reversed.
King Canute! thou shouldst be living at this hour!
The cards have been stacked for some time in favor of the green mob. Maybe Neil Ferguson’s demonstration of the explosive effect on a reputation of spouting nonsense will give some pause for thought.
Read more at Conservative Woman
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-20--This Super Rich ‘Fact Checker’ is Censoring Inconvenient CV-19 Facts

Globalist tech companies are moving at light speed to eliminate medical doctors who expose the truth about the COVID-19 pandemic .
A key actor in deleting all such content is a rich , politically-motivated China-linked woman , Flora Teoh ( photo , top ) .
The YouTube-Google CEO announced recently that only World Health Organisation ( WHO ) approved talking points are now permitted on their platform .
All other videos not approved by the China-dominated health organization are being removed .
See this video example : Two doctors in a video with millions of views who see patients daily @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in their California community .
This phenomena has also been reported in Boston , Miami , Santa Clara , Chicago and several European countries .
Their video was deleted .
Via an earlier post on TGP : Doctors Dan Erickson and Artin Massihi said their facilities have tested over 5,200 patients for the coronavirus throughout the county , making up for over half of all testing in Kern .
According to their data , the death rate of the coronavirus is similar in prevalence to the flu .
Dr. Erickson and Dr. Massihi @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to their specific Urgent Care facility , not the general population and thus may have overestimated infection numbers , though underestimating mortality rates , in California .
Ms. Flora Teoh is from an affluent family in Singapore .
Her family is Chinese and has mainland China ties .
It ’ s unknown if they were or are part of the Communist regime but Ms. Teoh ’ s lifestyle was excessive .
Miss Teoh traveled to Europe first class and stayed at luxurious hotels .
We discovered that Ms. Teoh obtained her PhD in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she held a post-doc at the Singapore Agency for Science , Technology , and Research ( A*STAR ) .
Ms. Flora Teoh was let go there after ten months because of ‘ poor professional fit.
’ In 7-2018 , Flora joined Asian Scientist Magazine as an intern but was let go after two months due to ‘ performance-related ’ issues .
In Singapore , Ms. Teoh used her connections to get into the Dragon Boat races there : Teoh is affiliated with multiple international organizations that are sponsored by Facebook , Google , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Foundation , Carnegie Foundation , the Open Society Foundations , and Omidyar Network .
In November of 2018 , she joined Science Feedback , a crypto Facebook affiliate as a science editor .
Her assignments for 2020 have been to : • Promote media that is aligned with ‘ progressive ’ science Flora Teoh is a contributor to several ‘ fact-checking ’ organizations such as Maldita.es , International Fact-Checking Network ( IFCN ) , and the International Data Verification Network , which aims to promote ‘ good ’ journalistic practices by fighting the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ IFCN is a project of the Poynter Institute for media studies that was created in 2015 .
Poynter gets its funding grants from entities such as : Google , MacArthur Foundation , Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation , Carnegie Foundation , the Open Society Foundations and Omidyar Network .
Teoh ’ s organizations are part of an international ‘ progressive ’ data verification network that is supported Open Society Foundations ( Soros ) and the Omidyar Network ( Pierre Omidyar ) .
Omidyar is also funding the ‘ Defeat Disinfo ’ AI Information @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s Covid-19 narrative .
Both Soros and Omidyar have also sponsored The Intercept , a publication that released documents stolen by Edward Snowden .
In 2018 , they also launched the Luminate platform that has distributed over $ 314 million to finance ‘ progressive ’ journalistic projects around the world .
Health Feedback is one of these projects .
Ms. Teoh is far left .
She bragged about reading corrupt former FBI Director Jim Comey ’ s book : Ms. Teoh ’ s writings as a “ Science Editor ” for entities like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ left wing bias : Ms. Teoh is the typical far left “ Factchecker ” used by entities like Google and Facebook .
She has a sketchy record and connections to China , George Soros and the Gates Foundation .
There was no way that two California doctors of immunology were going to get a fair assessment from Ms. Teoh , Facebook , George Soros or the Gates Foundation .
Facebook is now openly using far left operatives with links to China and Soros to silence US Doctors in the field !
This should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

This Super Rich ‘Fact Checker’ is Censoring Inconvenient CV-19 Facts
Written by Jim Hoft
Globalist tech companies are moving at light speed to eliminate medical doctors who expose the truth about the COVID-19 pandemic. A key actor in deleting all such content is a rich, politically-motivated China-linked woman, Flora Teoh (photo, top).
The YouTube-Google CEO announced recently that only World Health Organisation (WHO) approved talking points are now permitted on their platform. All other videos not approved by the China-dominated health organization are being removed. See this video example:
Two doctors in a video with millions of views who see patients daily also suggested the virus has spread widely in their California community. This phenomena has also been reported in Boston, Miami, Santa Clara, Chicago and several European countries. Their video was deleted.
Via an earlier post on TGP:
Doctors Dan Erickson and Artin Massihi said their facilities have tested over 5,200 patients for the coronavirus throughout the county, making up for over half of all testing in Kern. According to their data, the death rate of the coronavirus is similar in prevalence to the flu. Dr. Erickson and Dr. Massihi have extrapolated their numbers based on visits to their specific Urgent Care facility, not the general population and thus may have overestimated infection numbers, though underestimating mortality rates, in California.
Ms. Flora Teoh is from an affluent family in Singapore. Her family is Chinese and has mainland China ties. It’s unknown if they were or are part of the Communist regime but Ms. Teoh’s lifestyle was excessive.
Miss Teoh traveled to Europe first class and stayed at luxurious hotels.
We discovered that Ms. Teoh obtained her PhD in Singapore in 2017. In October 2017 she held a post-doc at the Singapore Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A*STAR).
Ms. Flora Teoh was let go there after ten months because of ‘poor professional fit.’
In 7-2018, Flora joined Asian Scientist Magazine as an intern but was let go after two months due to ‘performance-related’ issues.
In Singapore, Ms. Teoh used her connections to get into the Dragon Boat races there:
Teoh is affiliated with multiple international organizations that are sponsored by Facebook, Google, MacArthur Foundation, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Carnegie Foundation, the Open Society Foundations, and Omidyar Network.
In November of 2018, she joined Science Feedback, a crypto Facebook affiliate as a science editor.
Her assignments for 2020 have been to:
Monitor and control political discourse related to science
Gatekeep and censor ‘conservative’ scientific content
Promote media that is aligned with ‘progressive’ science
Flora Teoh is a contributor to several ‘fact-checking’ organizations such as Maldita.es, International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), and the International Data Verification Network, which aims to promote ‘good’ journalistic practices by fighting the dissemination of what they term fake-news. IFCN is a project of the Poynter Institute for media studies that was created in 2015. Poynter gets its funding grants from entities such as: Google, MacArthur Foundation, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Carnegie Foundation, the Open Society Foundations and Omidyar Network.
Teoh’s organizations are part of an international ‘progressive’ data verification network that is supported Open Society Foundations (Soros) and the Omidyar Network (Pierre Omidyar).
Omidyar is also funding the ‘Defeat Disinfo’ AI Information Warfare Platform to fight President Trump’s Covid-19 narrative. Both Soros and Omidyar have also sponsored The Intercept, a publication that released documents stolen by Edward Snowden. In 2018, they also launched the Luminate platform that has distributed over $314 million to finance ‘progressive’ journalistic projects around the world. Health Feedback is one of these projects.
Ms. Teoh is far left. She bragged about reading corrupt former FBI Director Jim Comey’s book:
Ms. Teoh’s writings as a “Science Editor” for entities like Facebook and Google are infected with her left wing bias:
Ms. Teoh is the typical far left “Factchecker” used by entities like Google and Facebook.
She has a sketchy record and connections to China, George Soros and the Gates Foundation.
There was no way that two California doctors of immunology were going to get a fair assessment from Ms. Teoh, Facebook, George Soros or the Gates Foundation.
Facebook is now openly using far left operatives with links to China and Soros to silence US Doctors in the field!
This should not be legal.
Read more at www.thegatewaypundit.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-20--Study: Evidence Shows COVID-19 Was Created in a Lab

A team of Australian scientists has produced new evidence that the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19 is optimized for penetration into human cells rather than animal cells , undermining the theory that the virus randomly evolved in an animal subject before passing into human beings , and suggesting instead that it was developed in a laboratory .
The study , which has not yet been peer reviewed , provides new but not yet conclusive evidence favoring the theory that the novel coronavirus originated not in a food market as has been claimed , but rather in a laboratory , presumably @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Virology in Wuhan , China , the city in which the first outbreak of COVID-19 occurred in December of 2019 .
The lead researcher on the team says that the results represent either “ a remarkable coincidence or a sign of human intervention ” in the creation of the virus .
The authors of the study , led by vaccine researcher Nikolai Petrovsky of Flinders University in Australia , used a version of the novel coronavirus collected in the earliest days of the outbreak and applied computer models to test its capacity to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ called “ ACE2 , ” that allow the virus to infect human and animal cells to varying degrees of efficacy .
They tested the propensity of the COVID-19 virus ’ s spike protein , which it uses to enter cells , to bind to the human type of ACE2 as well as to many different animal versions of ACE2 , and found that the novel coronavirus most powerfully binds with human ACE2 , and with variously lesser degrees of effectiveness with animal versions of the receptor .
According to the study ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that causes COVID-19 did not come from an animal intermediary , but became specialized for human cell penetration by living previously in human cells , quite possibly in a laboratory .
The authors write that “ this finding is particularly surprising as , typically , a virus would be expected to have highest affinity for the receptor in its original host species , e.g .
bat , with a lower initial binding affinity for the receptor of any new host , e.g .
humans .
However , in this case , the affinity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the putative original host species , bats , or for any potential intermediary host species.
” As a consequence , they add , a “ possibility which still can not be excluded is that SARSCoV-2 was created by a recombination event that occurred inadvertently or consciously in a laboratory handling coronaviruses , with the new virus then accidentally released into the local human population.
” In a separate public statement about the research made by Prof. Petrovsky on April 17 , the researcher notes that the results of his study are either @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of human intervention , ” and adds that it is “ entirely plausible that the virus was created in the biosecurity facility in Wuhan by selection on cells expressing human ACE2 , a laboratory that was known to be cultivating exotic bat coronaviruses at the time.
” “ If so the cultured virus could have escaped the facility either through accidental infection of a staff member who then visited the fish market several blocks away and there infected others , or by inappropriate disposal of waste from the facility that either infected humans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ susceptible vector such as a stray cat that then frequented the market and resulted in transmission there to humans , ” he added .
The researchers recognize that other possibilities exist , but regard them as improbable .
They found that the novel coronavirus has a strong , but lesser binding effect on the ACE2 receptor of Pangolins , which are mammals eaten in China as a delicacy which has often been proposed as the intermediary of the novel coronavirus between bats and humans .
However , they note that the Pangolin doesn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an intermediate species for human transmission , because “ given the higher affinity of [ the novel coronavirus ] SARS-CoV-2 for human ACE2 than for bat ACE2 , SARS-CoV-2 would have to have circulated in pangolins for a long period of time for this evolution and selection to occur and to date there is no evidence of a SARS-CoV-2 like virus circulating in pangolins.
” A preliminary form of the study , which is currently entitled , “ In silico comparison of spike protein-ACE2 binding affinities across species ; significance for the possible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has been published on a repository site maintained by Cornell University , which warns that studies published prior to peer review should not be considered “ established information ” unless multiple experts in a given field are first consulted .
According to his university webpage , in addition to his work as a university professor , Professor Petrovsky is currently Director of Endocrinology at Flinders Medical Centre of Flinders University , and Vice President and Secretary-General of the International Immunomics Society .
He is also the founder of Vaxine Pty Ltd. , which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Health and is currently working on a COVID-19 vaccine .
In addition to Professor Petrovsky , the research team that produced the study includes Prof. Sakshi Piplani , also of Flinders University , Puneet Kumar Singh , who works with Petrovsky and Piplani at Vaxine Pty Ltd. , and Prof. David A. Winkler , who teaches at the University of Nottingham in the U.K and Monash University in Australia .
Study contradicts scientists who claim “ zero evidence ” for lab origin of virus The results of the study tend to contradict @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coronavirus shows no signs of having been produced in a laboratory , some of whom have gone so far as to dismiss such theories as “ conspiracy theories.
” The “ conspiracy theory ” claim has been uncritically echoed in much , but not all , of the international media .
The staff of the Wuhan Institute of Virology have repeatedly denied the virus came from their lab .
Their position has been supported by a widely-referenced letter from several scientists published in Nature Medicine on March 17 , which argues against the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a human cell lab culture .
The argument made by the researchers in the letter is mostly based on the claim that no genetically-close progenitor to the novel coronavirus that could be a candidate for such a process has been described in any scientific study .
They also assert that “ repeated passage ” of coronaviruses in cell cultures have not been mentioned in scientific literature .
However , the letter ’ s authors do not address the possibility that the Wuhan Institute of Virology researchers simply did not report all of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ possibility that seems to have been reinforced in recent months by secrecy and cover-ups regarding COVID-19 research in China , and the repeated refusal of the Chinese government to participate in an international probe of the origins of the novel coronavirus .
Unless an animal version of virus is found , evidence points to “ human intervention ” Professor Petrovsky told LifeSite in an email interview that his study indicates that “ there are some highly unusual features , including optimal human adaptation , that in the absence of identification of a close @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from which COVID19 could have arisen , would point in the direction of human intervention at some point in the evolution of COVID19.
” He noted that , so far , researchers in China and elsewhere have not produced evidence of the presence in animals of a virus closely similar to the one that causes COVID-19 in humans , which would give credence to their theory of natural development in an intermediary between bats , which presumably originated the virus , and humans .
“ If an animal vector and virus could be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the matter completely , ” Petrovksy told LifeSite .
“ One would have thought that the Chinese would be intensively sampling all conceivable animals trying to find such a virus to exonerate their labs .
If no such intense search is going on ( which I don ’ t know one way or the other ) then the inference could be that they are not looking because they already know what they might find.
” Richard Ebright , a molecular biologist at Rutgers University who has been critical of laboratory studies that might @ @ @ @ @ @ @ told LifeSite that Petrovsky ’ s results “ are plausible , ” but cautioned that the results of the pre-print of the study “ are from computational modelling , not from experiments , and therefore must be considered as provisional at best.
” Ebright noted that an earlier study on ACE2 receptor binding found that a bat coronavirus similar to the COVID-19 virus had strong binding power with the ACE2 of tree shrews and ferrets , making them possible animal intermediary candidates .
However , the study did not compare the binding power @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ACE2 receptors with the binding power with humans , as does Petrovsky ’ s study .
Moreover , it did not use a gene sequence from an early version of the novel coronavirus itself , as does Petrovsky ’ s study , but rather used the gene sequence of a similar bat coronavirus reported by the Wuhan Institute of Virology , called RaTG13 .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Study: Evidence Shows COVID-19 Was Created in a Lab
Written by Matthew Cullinan Hoffman
A team of Australian scientists has produced new evidence that the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19 is optimized for penetration into human cells rather than animal cells, undermining the theory that the virus randomly evolved in an animal subject before passing into human beings, and suggesting instead that it was developed in a laboratory.
The study, which has not yet been peer reviewed, provides new but not yet conclusive evidence favoring the theory that the novel coronavirus originated not in a food market as has been claimed, but rather in a laboratory, presumably one operated by the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, the city in which the first outbreak of COVID-19 occurred in December of 2019.
The lead researcher on the team says that the results represent either “a remarkable coincidence or a sign of human intervention” in the creation of the virus.
The authors of the study, led by vaccine researcher Nikolai Petrovsky of Flinders University in Australia, used a version of the novel coronavirus collected in the earliest days of the outbreak and applied computer models to test its capacity to bind to certain cell receptor enzymes, called “ACE2,” that allow the virus to infect human and animal cells to varying degrees of efficacy.
They tested the propensity of the COVID-19 virus’s spike protein, which it uses to enter cells, to bind to the human type of ACE2 as well as to many different animal versions of ACE2, and found that the novel coronavirus most powerfully binds with human ACE2, and with variously lesser degrees of effectiveness with animal versions of the receptor.
According to the study’s authors, this implies that the virus that causes COVID-19 did not come from an animal intermediary, but became specialized for human cell penetration by living previously in human cells, quite possibly in a laboratory.
The authors write that “this finding is particularly surprising as, typically, a virus would be expected to have highest affinity for the receptor in its original host species, e.g. bat, with a lower initial binding affinity for the receptor of any new host, e.g. humans. However, in this case, the affinity of SARS-CoV-2 is higher for humans than for the putative original host species, bats, or for any potential intermediary host species.”
As a consequence, they add, a “possibility which still cannot be excluded is that SARSCoV-2 was created by a recombination event that occurred inadvertently or consciously in a laboratory handling coronaviruses, with the new virus then accidentally released into the local human population.”
In a separate public statement about the research made by Prof. Petrovsky on April 17, the researcher notes that the results of his study are either “a remarkable coincidence or a sign of human intervention,” and adds that it is “entirely plausible that the virus was created in the biosecurity facility in Wuhan by selection on cells expressing human ACE2, a laboratory that was known to be cultivating exotic bat coronaviruses at the time.”
“If so the cultured virus could have escaped the facility either through accidental infection of a staff member who then visited the fish market several blocks away and there infected others, or by inappropriate disposal of waste from the facility that either infected humans outside the facility directly or via a susceptible vector such as a stray cat that then frequented the market and resulted in transmission there to humans,” he added.
The researchers recognize that other possibilities exist, but regard them as improbable. They found that the novel coronavirus has a strong, but lesser binding effect on the ACE2 receptor of Pangolins, which are mammals eaten in China as a delicacy which has often been proposed as the intermediary of the novel coronavirus between bats and humans. However, they note that the Pangolin doesn’t offer a reasonable candidate for an intermediate species for human transmission, because “given the higher affinity of [the novel coronavirus] SARS-CoV-2 for human ACE2 than for bat ACE2, SARS-CoV-2 would have to have circulated in pangolins for a long period of time for this evolution and selection to occur and to date there is no evidence of a SARS-CoV-2 like virus circulating in pangolins.”
A preliminary form of the study, which is currently entitled, “In silico comparison of spike protein-ACE2 binding affinities across species; significance for the possible origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus,” has been published on a repository site maintained by Cornell University, which warns that studies published prior to peer review should not be considered “established information” unless multiple experts in a given field are first consulted.
According to his university webpage, in addition to his work as a university professor, Professor Petrovsky is currently Director of Endocrinology at Flinders Medical Centre of Flinders University, and Vice President and Secretary-General of the International Immunomics Society. He is also the founder of Vaxine Pty Ltd., which is funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health and is currently working on a COVID-19 vaccine.
In addition to Professor Petrovsky, the research team that produced the study includes Prof. Sakshi Piplani, also of Flinders University, Puneet Kumar Singh, who works with Petrovsky and Piplani at Vaxine Pty Ltd., and Prof. David A. Winkler, who teaches at the University of Nottingham in the U.K and Monash University in Australia.
Study contradicts scientists who claim “zero evidence” for lab origin of virus
The results of the study tend to contradict virologists who have claimed that the novel coronavirus shows no signs of having been produced in a laboratory, some of whom have gone so far as to dismiss such theories as “conspiracy theories.” The “conspiracy theory” claim has been uncritically echoed in much, but not all, of the international media. The staff of the Wuhan Institute of Virology have repeatedly denied the virus came from their lab.
Their position has been supported by a widely-referenced letter from several scientists published in Nature Medicine on March 17, which argues against the likelihood of a laboratory generating the virus in a human cell lab culture.
The argument made by the researchers in the letter is mostly based on the claim that no genetically-close progenitor to the novel coronavirus that could be a candidate for such a process has been described in any scientific study. They also assert that “repeated passage” of coronaviruses in cell cultures have not been mentioned in scientific literature.
However, the letter’s authors do not address the possibility that the Wuhan Institute of Virology researchers simply did not report all of their research to the public, a possibility that seems to have been reinforced in recent months by secrecy and cover-ups regarding COVID-19 research in China, and the repeated refusal of the Chinese government to participate in an international probe of the origins of the novel coronavirus.
Unless an animal version of virus is found, evidence points to “human intervention”
Professor Petrovsky told LifeSite in an email interview that his study indicates that “there are some highly unusual features, including optimal human adaptation, that in the absence of identification of a close to identical virus in an animal population from which COVID19 could have arisen, would point in the direction of human intervention at some point in the evolution of COVID19.”
He noted that, so far, researchers in China and elsewhere have not produced evidence of the presence in animals of a virus closely similar to the one that causes COVID-19 in humans, which would give credence to their theory of natural development in an intermediary between bats, which presumably originated the virus, and humans.
“If an animal vector and virus could be found then of course this would resolve the matter completely,” Petrovksy told LifeSite. “One would have thought that the Chinese would be intensively sampling all conceivable animals trying to find such a virus to exonerate their labs. If no such intense search is going on (which I don’t know one way or the other) then the inference could be that they are not looking because they already know what they might find.”
Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University who has been critical of laboratory studies that might produce new pathogens dangerous to humans, told LifeSite that Petrovsky’s results “are plausible,” but cautioned that the results of the pre-print of the study “are from computational modelling, not from experiments, and therefore must be considered as provisional at best.”
Ebright noted that an earlier study on ACE2 receptor binding found that a bat coronavirus similar to the COVID-19 virus had strong binding power with the ACE2 of tree shrews and ferrets, making them possible animal intermediary candidates. However, the study did not compare the binding power of the virus’ animal species’ ACE2 receptors with the binding power with humans, as does Petrovsky’s study. Moreover, it did not use a gene sequence from an early version of the novel coronavirus itself, as does Petrovsky’s study, but rather used the gene sequence of a similar bat coronavirus reported by the Wuhan Institute of Virology, called RaTG13.
Read the full article at www.lifesitenews.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-20--New Study: Hydroxychloroquine + Zinc Greatly Reduces COVID-19 Health Risk

While the main stream media yet again is pushing recycled headlines about a New York “ study ” of very ill patients who were NOT actually given the combination of hydroxychloroquine and zinc which concluded these near-death patients did no better or worse when given the drug , another study showing a very different result was largely ignored by these same media outlets .
Check out this headline coming out of New York as well which showed the combination of hydroxychloroquine and zinc slashed the risk of death from the coronavirus by nearly half .
NEW YORK – Researchers at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ found patients given the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine along with zinc sulphate and the antibiotic azithromycin were 44 percent less likely to die from the coronavirus .
“ Researchers at NYU ’ s Grossman School of Medicine found patients given the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine along with zinc sulphate and the antibiotic azithromycin were 44 percent less likely to die from the coronavirus .
“ Certainly we have very limited options as far as what we have seen work for this infection so anything that may work is very exciting , ” said Dr. Joseph @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Langone Health.
” The study looked at the records of 932 COVID-19 patients treated at local hospitals with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin .
More than 400 of them were also given 100 milligrams of zinc daily .
Researchers said the patients given zinc were one and a half times more likely to recover , decreasing their need for intensive care .
If one were to do an online news search right now for similar studies as above you will find story after story on the recycled New York study that showed no benefit from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from New York ) that indicates the hydroxychloroquine + zinc combination shows remarkable promise , is receiving almost zero media coverage .
This is the same combination that has been touted by physicians all across America and the world as proving highly effective and yet here in the U.S. there are forces both in government and the media who continue to push this success to the side while also pushing yet more fear and panic of the disease .
Did you know that in Italy , one of the nations hardest hit by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mass use of hydroxychloroquine and zinc , the death rate plummeted from a high of nearly a thousand a day to less than 200 ?
This drug combination protocol has been repeated in other nations like South Korea , France , Bahrain , Turkey , Brazil , etc.
, with similar rates of success there as well as outlined in this excerpt from an April 21st scientific journal release : “ On March 23 , 2020 a physician ( Vladimir Zelenko ) in Monroe , New York state , published online similar excellent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of breath and any patient in the high-risk category with HCQ , azithromycin and zinc sulfate for five days in order to prevent hospitalization .
On April 17 , 2020 doctors from a health care provider focused on mostly elderly and chronic patients in Brazil confirmed Raoul ’ s and Zelenko ’ s findings reporting that out of 636 symptomatic outpatients of the 224 who refused treatment ( control group ) , 12 were hospitalized ( 5.4 % ) , and of these 12 hospitalized , 5 patients died ( 41 % ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hand , of the 412 outpatients treated with HCQ and azithromycin , only 8 were hospitalized ( 1.94 % ) , and no deaths were observed .
In case of early treatment ( < 7 days of symptoms ) only 1.17 % of treated patients needed hospitalization , while the percentage raised to 3.2 % for late treatment ( > 7 days of symptoms ) .
These outcomes were even more remarkable considering that patients in the treatment groups had higher prevalence of comorbidities including diabetes , immunosuppression state and stroke [ 12 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there such push-back going on in the United States from the far-left media to dismiss what appears to be the undeniable effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine + zinc in combatting Covid-19 ?
Something very weird is going on here and people have been dying by the thousands because of it .
Good news , possibly life-saving news , is being pushed aside while bad news , not matter how flawed or biased , is put front and center in an effort to convince tens of millions that there is currently no real treatment options for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out there appears to say that is simply not so .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

New Study: Hydroxychloroquine + Zinc Greatly Reduces COVID-19 Health Risk
Written by dcwhispers.com
While the main stream media yet again is pushing recycled headlines about a New York “study” of very ill patients who were NOT actually given the combination of hydroxychloroquine and zinc which concluded these near-death patients did no better or worse when given the drug, another study showing a very different result was largely ignored by these same media outlets.
Imagine that.
Check out this headline coming out of New York as well which showed the combination of hydroxychloroquine and zinc slashed the risk of death from the coronavirus by nearly half.
NEW YORK – Researchers at NYU’s Grossman School of Medicine found patients given the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine along with zinc sulphate and the antibiotic azithromycin were 44 percent less likely to die from the coronavirus.
“Researchers at NYU’s Grossman School of Medicine found patients given the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine along with zinc sulphate and the antibiotic azithromycin were 44 percent less likely to die from the coronavirus. “Certainly we have very limited options as far as what we have seen work for this infection so anything that may work is very exciting,” said Dr. Joseph Rahimian, Infectious Disease Specialist at NYU Langone Health.”
The study looked at the records of 932 COVID-19 patients treated at local hospitals with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin.
More than 400 of them were also given 100 milligrams of zinc daily.
Researchers said the patients given zinc were one and a half times more likely to recover, decreasing their need for intensive care.
——————————
If one were to do an online news search right now for similar studies as above you will find story after story on the recycled New York study that showed no benefit from hydroxychloroquine while this other study (also from New York) that indicates the hydroxychloroquine + zinc combination shows remarkable promise, is receiving almost zero media coverage.
This is the same combination that has been touted by physicians all across America and the world as proving highly effective and yet here in the U.S. there are forces both in government and the media who continue to push this success to the side while also pushing yet more fear and panic of the disease.
Did you know that in Italy, one of the nations hardest hit by Covid 19, once doctors started initiating mass use of hydroxychloroquine and zinc, the death rate plummeted from a high of nearly a thousand a day to less than 200? This drug combination protocol has been repeated in other nations like South Korea, France, Bahrain, Turkey, Brazil, etc., with similar rates of success there as well as outlined in this excerpt from an April 21st scientific journal release:
“On March 23, 2020 a physician (Vladimir Zelenko) in Monroe, New York state, published online similar excellent outcomes on treating his patients with shortness of breath and any patient in the high-risk category with HCQ, azithromycin and zinc sulfate for five days in order to prevent hospitalization. On April 17, 2020 doctors from a health care provider focused on mostly elderly and chronic patients in Brazil confirmed Raoul’s and Zelenko’s findings reporting that out of 636 symptomatic outpatients of the 224 who refused treatment (control group), 12 were hospitalized (5.4{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}), and of these 12 hospitalized, 5 patients died (41{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}) [12]. On the other hand, of the 412 outpatients treated with HCQ and azithromycin, only 8 were hospitalized (1.94{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}), and no deaths were observed. In case of early treatment (<7 days of symptoms) only 1.17{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of treated patients needed hospitalization, while the percentage raised to 3.2{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} for late treatment (>7 days of symptoms). These outcomes were even more remarkable considering that patients in the treatment groups had higher prevalence of comorbidities including diabetes, immunosuppression state and stroke [12]. “
Again, why is there such push-back going on in the United States from the far-left media to dismiss what appears to be the undeniable effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine + zinc in combatting Covid-19?
Something very weird is going on here and people have been dying by the thousands because of it.
Good news, possibly life-saving news, is being pushed aside while bad news, not matter how flawed or biased, is put front and center in an effort to convince tens of millions that there is currently no real treatment options for the coronavirus even as so much data out there appears to say that is simply not so.
Read more at www.ny1.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-20--Facebook Ramps Up Censorship, Threats Against Climate Skeptics

On May 18th I was made aware of a notification a Facebook group admin had received from them about content shared in the group .
I am a fellow admin in the group , but did not receive any such notification .
The ‘ offending ’ post was apparently from April 27th , but Fb only informed the admin on May 18th .
The post was a tongue-in-cheek reference to Greta Thunberg being annoyed that a warming planet will help stifle the Covid-19 virus .
The notification said the post had been removed because it ‘ violates our Community Standards.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ continues the group may be ‘ disabled ’ .
In other words , shut down .
I have previously seen notifications from Fb that say if they disapprove of group content new posts may be pushed down the page so they are not readily visible , but this is the first instance I am aware of where Fb have made an overt threat to shut down a group because they disapprove of what is posted there , and in my view it sets a concerning and dangerous precedent .
In the image above @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the post is ‘ misinformation ’ that ‘ could cause physical harm.
’ Physical harm ?
To whom ?
Frankly , I fail to see how that is even possible .
The image above shows the options the group admin was offered to ‘ deal with ’ the offending post .
They include blocking , muting or removing the person from the group .
The admin chose to message the person to ask him not to add any more posts that feature Greta .
The upshot of all this is that Facebook is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or misinformation anything that is not left-wing , or in this case , speaks out against , or pokes fun at , the ‘ climate emergency ’ or Greta Thunberg , and threaten to shut down groups that allow such posts .
I think we can safely assume Facebook is now completely dominated and controlled by left-wing activists , and are actively seeking to stifle and censor what they do not like .
The so-called ‘ fact-checking ’ groups they employ are composed almost entirely of left-wing and extreme left-wing voices , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ efforts to push the left-wing agenda and censor people and prevent free-speech .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Facebook Ramps Up Censorship, Threats Against Climate Skeptics
Written by Andy Rowlands
On May 18th I was made aware of a notification a Facebook group admin had received from them about content shared in the group. I am a fellow admin in the group, but did not receive any such notification. The ‘offending’ post was apparently from April 27th, but Fb only informed the admin on May 18th.
The post was a tongue-in-cheek reference to Greta Thunberg being annoyed that a warming planet will help stifle the Covid-19 virus. The notification said the post had been removed because it ‘violates our Community Standards.’, and then said if this continues the group may be ‘disabled’. In other words, shut down.
I have previously seen notifications from Fb that say if they disapprove of group content new posts may be pushed down the page so they are not readily visible, but this is the first instance I am aware of where Fb have made an overt threat to shut down a group because they disapprove of what is posted there, and in my view it sets a concerning and dangerous precedent.
In the image above, you can see Fb also claims the post is ‘misinformation’ that ‘could cause physical harm.’ Physical harm? To whom? Frankly, I fail to see how that is even possible.
The image above shows the options the group admin was offered to ‘deal with’ the offending post. They include blocking, muting or removing the person from the group. The admin chose to message the person to ask him not to add any more posts that feature Greta.
The upshot of all this is that Facebook is now saying they will flag as spam or misinformation anything that is not left-wing, or in this case, speaks out against, or pokes fun at, the ‘climate emergency’ or Greta Thunberg, and threaten to shut down groups that allow such posts.
I think we can safely assume Facebook is now completely dominated and controlled by left-wing activists, and are actively seeking to stifle and censor what they do not like. The so-called ‘fact-checking’ groups they employ are composed almost entirely of left-wing and extreme left-wing voices, and they seem to be ramping up their efforts to push the left-wing agenda and censor people and prevent free-speech.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-20--Substance Abuse Causes Mental Disorders

Substance Abuse Causes Mental Disorders

Many individuals that are diagnosed with substance use disorders also have mental disorders .
Many people use drugs to medicate or alleviate the symptoms of different illnesses .
For instance , some people use euphoric drugs trying to ameliorate depressed feelings .
Others use alcohol to alleviate anxiety symptoms .
Although this is a common technique , it does not help .
Essentially , abusing drug can cause more harm than good .
Although substance abuse can mask an illness , it can lead to the development of mental disorders .
Thus , drug abuse can cause a mental disorder @ @ @ @ @ @ @ taken to bring .
Mental Problems that Substance Abuse can Cause Some people search for the phrase ‘ rehab near me ’ or ‘ one-stop drug rehab locator — find drug rehabs nearby ’ when they realize that substance abuse is causing mental problems .
Rehab is a treatment facility that provides counseling and therapy whose aim is to help a person recover from addiction .
Different rehab centers provide treatments for different addictions .
Their programs may also vary .
That ’ s why a person should be careful when choosing a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dual diagnosis and treatment .
That means they can treat substance abuse and mental disorders .
And , these are the best facilities for people struggling with mental illnesses caused by substance abuse .
Research has shown that substance abuse can cause many mental illnesses .
Anybody with any of these conditions should search for the phrase ‘ drug rehab near me ’ and seek immediate assistance .
That ’ s because most co-occurring conditions will not get better if not treatment is sought .
Instead , they will worsen and continue to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some cases .
Why Substance Abuse can Cause a Mental Disorder Mental disorders are different .
Similarly , they come in different ways .
However , several general reasons can lead to their development .
• The overall health of the drug user • The addictive substance that is taken by a person • The amount of drug taken by a person • The duration for which a person uses drugs These are some of the reasons why sweeping generalizations can ’ t be made when it comes to determining why substance abuse @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s more , mental illnesses can look different among sufferers .
For instance , research has shown that perceptual disorders and psychosis can develop in a marijuana user .
That ’ s because the active ingredient in cannabis , THC , can disrupt the brain ’ s chemical networks that connect different brain sides .
This disruption leads to loss or dropping of information .
Consequently , a marijuana user may exhibit symptoms that are similar to those of people with a psychotic or a hallucination disorder .
Similarly , amphetamine and cocaine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ However , their effects are felt when taken for a long period and in large amounts .
Additionally , depression has been associated with the drug amount that a person takes .
For instance , taking a large amount of heroin or other euphoric drugs can lead to depression .
Nevertheless , searching for the phrase ‘ drug rehabs near me ’ online and seeking help in one facility can mark the turning point in the life of an addict .
An integrated approach provides the best treatment for dual diagnosis or co-occurring @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mental disorders and substance abuse simultaneously .
Treatment for a mental health problem can involve group or individual counseling , medication , peer support , and lifestyle changes .
Treatment for substance abuse , on the other hand , can include withdrawal symptoms management , behavioral therapy , detoxification , and support groups that help a person maintain sobriety .
After searching for ‘ inpatient drug rehab near me ’ and choosing a facility , it ’ s important to keep in mind the fact that there is always hope for a better @ @ @ @ @ @ @ situation seems , anybody can recover from drug addiction to lead a sober , healthy , and happy life .
The most important thing is to get sober and follow through the treatment process .
Relapse can happen and this should not discourage a person .
Instead , they should get support and encouragement from peers and family .
Substance abuse can cause different mental disorders .
However , individuals can recover from both substance abuse and co-occurring mental disorders .
The most important thing is to search for ‘ drug rehab centers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right facility , and follow through the treatment process .
This may not be easy for a person that has been living in addiction for a long time .
However , anybody can recover from addiction and lead a healthy , sober life as long as they are ready to seek professional assistance and determined to overcome the problem .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Scientific Method .

Substance Abuse Causes Mental Disorders
Written by Sarah Williams
Many individuals that are diagnosed with substance use disorders also have mental disorders. Many people use drugs to medicate or alleviate the symptoms of different illnesses. For instance, some people use euphoric drugs trying to ameliorate depressed feelings.
Others use alcohol to alleviate anxiety symptoms. Although this is a common technique, it does not help.
Essentially, abusing drug can cause more harm than good. Although substance abuse can mask an illness, it can lead to the development of mental disorders. Thus, drug abuse can cause a mental disorder instead of bringing the relief they are taken to bring.
Mental Problems that Substance Abuse can Cause
Some people search for the phrase ‘rehab near me’ or ‘one-stop drug rehab locator — find drug rehabs nearby’ when they realize that substance abuse is causing mental problems. Rehab is a treatment facility that provides counseling and therapy whose aim is to help a person recover from addiction. Different rehab centers provide treatments for different addictions. Their programs may also vary. That’s why a person should be careful when choosing a rehab facility.
Some rehab centers provide dual diagnosis and treatment. That means they can treat substance abuse and mental disorders. And, these are the best facilities for people struggling with mental illnesses caused by substance abuse. Research has shown that substance abuse can cause many mental illnesses.
These include:
Deliriums
Persisting amnestic disorder
Psychotic disorder
Mood disorder
Anxiety disorder
Perceptual disorder
Sexual dysfunction
Sleep disorder
Anybody with any of these conditions should search for the phrase ‘drug rehab near me’ and seek immediate assistance. That’s because most co-occurring conditions will not get better if not treatment is sought. Instead, they will worsen and continue to cause more problems and even death in some cases.
Why Substance Abuse can Cause a Mental Disorder
Mental disorders are different. Similarly, they come in different ways. However, several general reasons can lead to their development.
These include:
The overall health of the drug user
The addictive substance that is taken by a person
The amount of drug taken by a person
The duration for which a person uses drugs
These are some of the reasons why sweeping generalizations can’t be made when it comes to determining why substance abuse leads to mental disorders. What’s more, mental illnesses can look different among sufferers.
For instance, research has shown that perceptual disorders and psychosis can develop in a marijuana user. That’s because the active ingredient in cannabis, THC, can disrupt the brain’s chemical networks that connect different brain sides. This disruption leads to loss or dropping of information. Consequently, a marijuana user may exhibit symptoms that are similar to those of people with a psychotic or a hallucination disorder.
Similarly, amphetamine and cocaine have been linked to psychotic disorders. However, their effects are felt when taken for a long period and in large amounts. Additionally, depression has been associated with the drug amount that a person takes. For instance, taking a large amount of heroin or other euphoric drugs can lead to depression. Nevertheless, searching for the phrase ‘drug rehabs near me’ online and seeking help in one facility can mark the turning point in the life of an addict.
Treatment for Mental Disorders Caused by Substance Abuse
An integrated approach provides the best treatment for dual diagnosis or co-occurring disorders. This involves the treatment of mental disorders and substance abuse simultaneously. Treatment for a mental health problem can involve group or individual counseling, medication, peer support, and lifestyle changes. Treatment for substance abuse, on the other hand, can include withdrawal symptoms management, behavioral therapy, detoxification, and support groups that help a person maintain sobriety.
After searching for ‘inpatient drug rehab near me’ and choosing a facility, it’s important to keep in mind the fact that there is always hope for a better future. No matter how bad the situation seems, anybody can recover from drug addiction to lead a sober, healthy, and happy life. The most important thing is to get sober and follow through the treatment process. Relapse can happen and this should not discourage a person. Instead, they should get support and encouragement from peers and family.
The Bottom Line
Substance abuse can cause different mental disorders. However, individuals can recover from both substance abuse and co-occurring mental disorders. The most important thing is to search for ‘drug rehab centers near me’ online, choose the right facility, and follow through the treatment process. This may not be easy for a person that has been living in addiction for a long time. However, anybody can recover from addiction and lead a healthy, sober life as long as they are ready to seek professional assistance and determined to overcome the problem.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related