principiascientificinternational--2020-04-15--COVID19 Whistleblower: ‘We Are Treating the Wrong Disease’

Another whistleblower , a doctor treating Coronavirus patients himself has come out with a startling disclosure saying COVID-19 patients need Oxygen therapy not Ventilator and that we may be treating the wrong disease .
He says the patients symptoms resemble High Altitude Sickness and not Pneumonia .
Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell is a doctor treating COVID-19 patients in New York City ’ s Maimonides Medical Center .
Nine days ago Dr. Cameron opened an Intensive Care Unit to care for COVID-19 patients in New York City .
Here is what he learned in his own words : “ I am a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bedside of COVID+ patients in NYC .
I believe we are treating the wrong disease and that we must change what we are doing if we want to save as many lives as possible.
” “ In February , South Korean physicians reported that critical Covid-19 patients responded well to oxygen therapy without a ventilator .
Patients are getting multiple organ damage from hypoxia .
It ’ s not the pneumonia that ’ s the killer , it ’ s the cellular oxygen deprivation .
And we are hurting these patients with ventilators.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ have seen a huge revelation : COVID-19 causes prolonged and progressive hypoxia ( starving your body of oxygen ) by binding to the heme groups in hemoglobin in your red blood cells .
People are simply desaturating ( losing o2 in their blood ) , and that ’ s what eventually leads to organ failures that kill them , not any form of ARDS or pneumonia .
All the damage to the lungs you see in CT scans are from the release of oxidative iron from the hemes , this overwhelms the natural @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that nice , always-bilateral ground glass opacity in the lungs .
Patients returning for re-hospitalization days or weeks after recovery suffering from apparent delayed post-hypoxic leukoencephalopathy strengthen the notion COVID-19 patients are suffering from hypoxia despite no signs of respiratory ‘ tire out ’ or fatigue .
– READ MORE Listen to the insightful Thomas Paine Podcast Below —

COVID19 Whistleblower: ‘We Are Treating the Wrong Disease’
Written by greatgameindia.com
Another whistleblower, a doctor treating Coronavirus patients himself has come out with a startling disclosure saying COVID-19 patients need Oxygen therapy not Ventilator and that we may be treating the wrong disease. He says the patients symptoms resemble High Altitude Sickness and not Pneumonia.
Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell is a doctor treating COVID-19 patients in New York City’s Maimonides Medical Center. Nine days ago Dr. Cameron opened an Intensive Care Unit to care for COVID-19 patients in New York City. Here is what he learned in his own words:
“I am a physician who has been working at the bedside of COVID+ patients in NYC. I believe we are treating the wrong disease and that we must change what we are doing if we want to save as many lives as possible.” “In February, South Korean physicians reported that critical Covid-19 patients responded well to oxygen therapy without a ventilator. Patients are getting multiple organ damage from hypoxia. It’s not the pneumonia that’s the killer, it’s the cellular oxygen deprivation. And we are hurting these patients with ventilators.”
The past 48 hours or so have seen a huge revelation: COVID-19 causes prolonged and progressive hypoxia (starving your body of oxygen) by binding to the heme groups in hemoglobin in your red blood cells. People are simply desaturating (losing o2 in their blood), and that’s what eventually leads to organ failures that kill them, not any form of ARDS or pneumonia. All the damage to the lungs you see in CT scans are from the release of oxidative iron from the hemes, this overwhelms the natural defenses against pulmonary oxidative stress and causes that nice, always-bilateral ground glass opacity in the lungs.
Patients returning for re-hospitalization days or weeks after recovery suffering from apparent delayed post-hypoxic leukoencephalopathy strengthen the notion COVID-19 patients are suffering from hypoxia despite no signs of respiratory ‘tire out’ or fatigue. – READ MORE
Listen to the insightful Thomas Paine Podcast Below —
**** PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-04-15--New Study: COVID19 is Widespread Thus Not Very Life-threatening

New Study : COVID19 is Widespread Thus Not Very Life-threatening If millions of people were infected weeks ago without dying , the virus must be less deadly than official data suggests , according to evidence from Johns Hopkins University .
One of the few things known for sure about covid-19 is that it has spread faster than official data imply .
Most countries have tested sparingly , focusing on the sick .
Just 0.1 % of Americans and 0.2 % of Italians have been tested and come up positive .
In contrast , a study of the entire population of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rate of 3 % .
The lack of testing has set off a hunt for proxies for covid-19 infection , from smart-thermometer readings to Google searches for “ I can ’ t smell ” .
A new paper by Justin Silverman and Alex Washburne uses data on influenza-like illness ( ) to show that – o -2 is now widespread in America .
Every week , 2,600 American clinicians report the share of their patients who have —a fever of at least 37.8°C ( 100°F ) and a cough or sore throat , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , is often caused by flu .
But many other ailments also produce , such as common colds , strep throat and , now , covid-19 .
The authors assume that the share of these providers ’ patients with who do have the flu matches the rate of flu tests that are positive in the same state and week .
This lets them estimate how many people have seriously enough to call a doctor , but do not have the flu—and how many more people have had non-flu in 2020 than in prior @ @ @ @ @ @ @ surged .
Its rise has the same geographic pattern as covid-19 cases : modest in states with few positive tests , like Kentucky , and steep in ones with big outbreaks , such as New Jersey .
In total , estimated non-flu from March 8th to 28th exceeded a historical baseline by 23m cases—200 times the number of positive covid-19 tests in that period .
This may overstate the spread of covid-19 , since non-flu has other causes .
It could also be too low , because people with asymptomatic or mild covid-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ alarming , but should be reassuring .
Covid-19 takes 20-25 days to kill victims .
The paper reckons that 7m Americans were infected from March 8th to 14th , and official data show 7,000 deaths three weeks later .
The resulting fatality rate is 0.1 % , similar to that of flu .
That is amazingly low , just a tenth of some other estimates .
Perhaps it is just wrong , possibly because the death toll has been under-reported .
Perhaps , though , New York ’ s hospitals are overflowing because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has crammed the equivalent of a year ’ s worth of flu cases into one week .
■ PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

New Study: COVID19 is Widespread Thus Not Very Life-threatening
Written by The Economist
If millions of people were infected weeks ago without dying, the virus must be less deadly than official data suggests, according to evidence from Johns Hopkins University.
One of the few things known for sure about covid-19 is that it has spread faster than official data imply. Most countries have tested sparingly, focusing on the sick. Just 0.1{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of Americans and 0.2{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of Italians have been tested and come up positive. In contrast, a study of the entire population of the Italian town of Vò found a rate of 3{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}.
The lack of testing has set off a hunt for proxies for covid-19 infection, from smart-thermometer readings to Google searches for “I can’t smell”. A new paper by Justin Silverman and Alex Washburne uses data on influenza-like illness ( ili ) to show that sars – c o v -2 is now widespread in America.
Every week, 2,600 American clinicians report the share of their patients who have ili —a fever of at least 37.8°C (100°F) and a cough or sore throat, without a known non-flu reason. Unsurprisingly, ili is often caused by flu. But many other ailments also produce ili , such as common colds, strep throat and, now, covid-19. The authors assume that the share of these providers’ patients with ili who do have the flu matches the rate of flu tests that are positive in the same state and week. This lets them estimate how many people have ili seriously enough to call a doctor, but do not have the flu—and how many more people have had non-flu ili in 2020 than in prior years.
They find that non-flu ili has surged. Its rise has the same geographic pattern as covid-19 cases: modest in states with few positive tests, like Kentucky, and steep in ones with big outbreaks, such as New Jersey. In total, estimated non-flu ili from March 8th to 28th exceeded a historical baseline by 23m cases—200 times the number of positive covid-19 tests in that period. This may overstate the spread of covid-19, since non-flu ili has other causes. It could also be too low, because people with asymptomatic or mild covid-19 would not report non-flu ili .
This sounds alarming, but should be reassuring. Covid-19 takes 20-25 days to kill victims. The paper reckons that 7m Americans were infected from March 8th to 14th, and official data show 7,000 deaths three weeks later. The resulting fatality rate is 0.1{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}, similar to that of flu. That is amazingly low, just a tenth of some other estimates. Perhaps it is just wrong, possibly because the death toll has been under-reported. Perhaps, though, New York’s hospitals are overflowing because the virus is so contagious that it has crammed the equivalent of a year’s worth of flu cases into one week. ■
Sources: “Using ILI surveillance to estimate state-specific case detection rates”, by J. Silverman & A. Washburne; Johns Hopkins CSSE
Read more at www.economist.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-04-15--What Will Come After this Pandemic is Over?

What Will Come After this Pandemic is Over ?
I have already written about the currency reset and other features of a technocratic future waiting in the wings .
—New levels of visible surveillance , social credit scores , universal guaranteed income , Internet of Things , energy-use quotas , smart cities .
Events can move in several directions , going forward .
In this article , I explore one of those directions .
The occasion is this fake pandemic ; the big hammer is the vaccine against the phony COVID .
As Fauci mentioned a couple of months ago @ @ @ @ @ @ @ technology—which means it is really gene therapy .
Synthesized genes are injected into the body .
They purportedly set up immunity .
Actually , they PERMANENTLY alter the genetic makeup of the recipient .
As you can imagine , this creates the opportunity to put many different genes into humans .
To try to invent “ new humans.
” The so-called immunity certificates Fauci is now talking about ?
They would be issued to people who test positive on the new antibody tests for COVID-19—which is an interesting turnaround , because , since @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been taken to mean “ infected.
” Why the shift ?
Because there is a need for these immunity certificates—as an INTRO to condition the population to an IDEA .
If and when the COVID vaccine arrives , the certificates would be used to signify immunity for all those who take the shot .
It would function as a license .
Your passport into the Brave New World .
You ’ re “ immune , ” so you ’ re allowed to move out of fear mode .
And circulate and travel and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reference is the New York Times , 3/15/15 , “ Protection Without a Vaccine.
” It describes the frontier of research .
Here are key quotes that illustrate the use of synthetic genes to “ protect against disease , ” while changing the genetic makeup of humans .
This is not science fiction : “ ’ The sky ’ s the limit , ’ said Michael Farzan , an immunologist at Scripps and lead author of the new study.
” Here is the punchline : Read that again : “ the synthetic gene @ @ @ @ @ @ @ own DNA.
” The Times article taps Dr. David Baltimore for an opinion : Yes , some people might be leery .
If they have two or three working brain cells .
This is genetic roulette with a loaded gun .
And the further implications are clear .
Vaccines can be used as a cover for the injections of any and all genes , whose actual purpose is unannounced .
The vaccine masters have a problem .
They know their genetic technology is far from perfect .
Plans to re-engineer the human race @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
For example , consider the latest and greatest genetic tool , called CRISPR .
It ’ s called CRISPR , a much faster , more precise , and cheaper technique for editing genes .
Researchers are in love with it .
You can find hundreds of articles and studies fawning over the innovation .
At phys.org , however , we have this , ahem , warning note ( 5/29/17 ) : “ In the new study , the researchers sequenced the entire genome of mice that had undergone CRISPR gene editing in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ looked for all mutations , including those that only altered a single nucleotide.
” “ The researchers determined that CRISPR had successfully corrected a gene that causes blindness , but Kellie Schaefer , a PhD student in the lab of Vinit Mahajan , MD , PhD , associate professor of ophthalmology at Stanford University , and co-author of the study , found that the genomes of two independent gene therapy recipients [ mice ] HAD SUSTAINED MORE THAN 1500 SINGLE-NUCLEOTIDE MUTATIONS AND MORE THAN 100 LARGER [ GENE ] DELETIONS AND INSERTIONS .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ by computer algorithms that are widely used by researchers to look for off-target effects.
” ( Emphasis is mine . )
“ ’ Researchers who aren ’ t using whole genome sequencing to find off-target effects may be missing potentially important mutations , ’ Dr. Tsang says .
‘ Even a single nucleotide change can have a huge impact ’ .
” Genetic roulette is alive and well .
Spin the wheel , see what numbers come up .
Good effects , bad effects , who knows ?
Step right up and take @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who admit these tremendous problems remain optimistic .
They look forward to “ refining the method.
” That ’ s a cover for : “ we really don ’ t know what we ’ re doing right now.
” Unfortunately , much science operates in this fashion .
Launch a new technology , and turn a blind eye to the consequences .
For example , place mercury , a devastating neurotoxin , in vaccines .
What harm could result—aside from the destruction of children ’ s brains .
The train has left the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ think only the most careful and competent leading lights of the genetic research community would be permitted to get within a mile of CRISPR , here is more from technologynetworks.com : That ’ s good to know .
“ Anyone with lab space and an idea ” can jump on board and have at it .
Do your own cross breeding of the pregnant phrases , “ What could possibly go wrong , ” and “ Nothing to see here , move along , ” and you ’ ve summarized the situation .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but now I turn green and purple and I keep falling down.
” If all this isn ’ t enough to make you see the dangers of CRISPR , consider this statement about engineering human immune cells ( T-cells ) in a “ safer ” way .
From statnews.com ( June 23 , 2013 ) : Not very comforting .
Once set in motion , even under the most protected and limited conditions , CRISPR can keep on working , scrambling genes in unknown ways .
So…when it comes to DNA vaccines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to precisely re-engineer humans could quite easily descend into uncontrolled chaos .
And the controllers and elite funders of the vaccine know that .
What to do ?
With the global population as their guinea pigs , perhaps they would start small .
Introduce the slightest possible gene-alteration , stand back and see what happens .
Try out a gene that would ordinarily—hopefully—achieve next to nothing .
Try to measure the results .
Viewed from one angle , the whole fake epidemic is a set-up for the vaccine , and for mandatory vaccines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exemption from liability recently issued by the US Dept .
of Health and Human Services .
Basically , anyone associated with pharmaceutical strategies undertaken “ against the coronavirus ” can not be sued , regardless of “ adverse effects ” of medicines or vaccines .
Taking a stand against mandatory vaccines—any and all vaccines—is more important than ever .
About the author : Jon Rappoport has written three explosive collections , THE MATRIX REVEALED , EXIT FROM THE MATRIX , and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX , Jon was a candidate for a US @ @ @ @ @ @ @ California .
He maintains a consulting practice for private clients , the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power .
Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize , he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years , writing articles on politics , medicine , and health for CBS Healthwatch , LA Weekly , Spin Magazine , Stern , and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

What Will Come After this Pandemic is Over?
Written by Jon Rappoport
I have already written about the currency reset and other features of a technocratic future waiting in the wings. —New levels of visible surveillance, social credit scores, universal guaranteed income, Internet of Things, energy-use quotas, smart cities.
Events can move in several directions, going forward. In this article, I explore one of those directions.
The occasion is this fake pandemic; the big hammer is the vaccine against the phony COVID.
As Fauci mentioned a couple of months ago, it could be a DNA vaccine—new technology—which means it is really gene therapy. Synthesized genes are injected into the body. They purportedly set up immunity. Actually, they PERMANENTLY alter the genetic makeup of the recipient.
As you can imagine, this creates the opportunity to put many different genes into humans. To try to invent “new humans.”
The so-called immunity certificates Fauci is now talking about? They would be issued to people who test positive on the new antibody tests for COVID-19—which is an interesting turnaround, because, since 1984, positive tests results have generally been taken to mean “infected.” Why the shift?
Because there is a need for these immunity certificates—as an INTRO to condition the population to an IDEA.
If and when the COVID vaccine arrives, the certificates would be used to signify immunity for all those who take the shot.
It would function as a license. Your passport into the Brave New World. You’re “immune,” so you’re allowed to move out of fear mode. And circulate and travel and enter schools…
For DNA vaccines, the reference is the New York Times, 3/15/15, “Protection Without a Vaccine.” It describes the frontier of research. Here are key quotes that illustrate the use of synthetic genes to “protect against disease,” while changing the genetic makeup of humans. This is not science fiction:
“By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the [experimental] monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease.”
“’The sky’s the limit,’ said Michael Farzan, an immunologist at Scripps and lead author of the new study.”
“The first human trial based on this strategy — called immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer, or I.G.T. — is underway, and several new ones are planned.” [That was five years ago.] “I.G.T. is altogether different from traditional vaccination. It is instead a form of gene therapy. Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes are placed into viruses and injected into human tissue, usually muscle.”
Here is the punchline:
“The viruses invade human cells with their DNA payloads, and the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA. If all goes well, the new genes instruct the cells to begin manufacturing powerful antibodies.”
Read that again: “the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA.”
Alteration of the human genetic makeup.
Not just a “visit.” Permanent residence.
The Times article taps Dr. David Baltimore for an opinion:
“Still, Dr. Baltimore says that he envisions that some people might be leery of a vaccination strategy that means altering their own DNA, even if it prevents a potentially fatal disease.”
Yes, some people might be leery. If they have two or three working brain cells.
This is genetic roulette with a loaded gun.
And the further implications are clear. Vaccines can be used as a cover for the injections of any and all genes, whose actual purpose is unannounced.
The vaccine masters have a problem. They know their genetic technology is far from perfect. Plans to re-engineer the human race are not a simple one two three.
For example, consider the latest and greatest genetic tool, called CRISPR.
Here is a backgrounder I wrote a year ago.
New CRISPR gene-editing: the extreme dangers
Technologynetworks.com (6/26/17):
“CRISPR gene editing is taking biomedical research by storm. Providing the ultimate toolbox for genetic manipulation, many new applications for this technology are now being investigated and established. CRISPR systems are already delivering superior genetic models for fundamental disease research, drug screening and therapy development, rapid diagnostics, in vivo editing and correction of heritable conditions and now the first human CRISPR clinical trials.”
All hail.
It’s called CRISPR, a much faster, more precise, and cheaper technique for editing genes. Researchers are in love with it. You can find hundreds of articles and studies fawning over the innovation.
At phys.org, however, we have this, ahem, warning note (5/29/17):
“…a new study published in Nature Methods has found that the gene-editing technology can introduce hundreds of unintended mutations into the genome.”
Oops.
“In the new study, the researchers sequenced the entire genome of mice that had undergone CRISPR gene editing in the team’s previous study and looked for all mutations, including those that only altered a single nucleotide.” “The researchers determined that CRISPR had successfully corrected a gene that causes blindness, but Kellie Schaefer, a PhD student in the lab of Vinit Mahajan, MD, PhD, associate professor of ophthalmology at Stanford University, and co-author of the study, found that the genomes of two independent gene therapy recipients [mice] HAD SUSTAINED MORE THAN 1500 SINGLE-NUCLEOTIDE MUTATIONS AND MORE THAN 100 LARGER [GENE] DELETIONS AND INSERTIONS. None of these DNA mutations were predicted by computer algorithms that are widely used by researchers to look for off-target effects.” (Emphasis is mine.) “’Researchers who aren’t using whole genome sequencing to find off-target effects may be missing potentially important mutations,’ Dr. Tsang says. ‘Even a single nucleotide change can have a huge impact’.”
Genetic roulette is alive and well.
Spin the wheel, see what numbers come up. Good effects, bad effects, who knows? Step right up and take your chances.
Of course, researchers who admit these tremendous problems remain optimistic. They look forward to “refining the method.” That’s a cover for: “we really don’t know what we’re doing right now.”
Unfortunately, much science operates in this fashion. Launch a new technology, and turn a blind eye to the consequences. For example, place mercury, a devastating neurotoxin, in vaccines. What harm could result—aside from the destruction of children’s brains.
Here is more gushing PR, otherwise known as throwing stuff at the wall and seeing what sticks: “There are weekly press releases and updates on new advances [in CRISPR] and discoveries made possible with this technology; the first evidence is now emerging that CRISPR-Cas9 could provide cures for major diseases including cancers and devastating human viruses such as HIV-1.” (technologynetworks.com)
The train has left the station.
And just in case you think only the most careful and competent leading lights of the genetic research community would be permitted to get within a mile of CRISPR, here is more from technologynetworks.com:
“CRISPR-Cas9 systems, tools and basic methodology are very accessible as ready to go toolkits that anyone with lab space and an idea can pick up and start working with…In response to a growing need, companies such as Desktop Genetics have developed open access software to accelerate CRISPR experimentation and analysis.”
That’s good to know. “Anyone with lab space and an idea” can jump on board and have at it.
Do your own cross breeding of the pregnant phrases, “What could possibly go wrong,” and “Nothing to see here, move along,” and you’ve summarized the situation.
“They say they cured my anemia, but now I turn green and purple and I keep falling down.”
If all this isn’t enough to make you see the dangers of CRISPR, consider this statement about engineering human immune cells (T-cells) in a “safer” way. From statnews.com (June 23, 2013):
“The experiment would alter the immune system’s T cells only after they’re removed from a patient. That gives scientists the chance to screen the CRISPR’d cells to make sure only the three intended genes, all involved in making T cells find and destroy tumor cells, are altered. But after those T cells are infused back into a patient to fight melanoma, sarcoma, or myeloma, the CRISPR system can keep editing DNA, and tracking such edits becomes like following a polar bear in a snowstorm.”
Not very comforting. Once set in motion, even under the most protected and limited conditions, CRISPR can keep on working, scrambling genes in unknown ways.
So…when it comes to DNA vaccines, aka gene therapy, a plan to precisely re-engineer humans could quite easily descend into uncontrolled chaos.
And the controllers and elite funders of the vaccine know that.
What to do?
With the global population as their guinea pigs, perhaps they would start small. Introduce the slightest possible gene-alteration, stand back and see what happens. Try out a gene that would ordinarily—hopefully—achieve next to nothing. Try to measure the results.
Viewed from one angle, the whole fake epidemic is a set-up for the vaccine, and for mandatory vaccines.
I have written about the special exemption from liability recently issued by the US Dept. of Health and Human Services. Basically, anyone associated with pharmaceutical strategies undertaken “against the coronavirus” cannot be sued, regardless of “adverse effects” of medicines or vaccines.
Taking a stand against mandatory vaccines—any and all vaccines—is more important than ever.
About the author: Jon Rappoport has written three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe.
Read more at blog.nomorefakenews.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-04-15--WHO Official Claims Link Between Pandemic & Climate Change

WHO Official Claims Link Between Pandemic & Climate Change World Health Organization ( WHO ) officials are diverting attention away from the real causes of global pandemics and the Chinese government ’ s culpability in the spread of the Wuhan COVID-19 coronavirus by launching propaganda falsely linking pandemics to global warming .
In the latest example , WHO researcher Arthur Wyns authored an article in Scientific American falsely claiming climate change may “ make the effects of a current or future pandemic worse.
” Overwhelming scientific evidence , however , shows a warmer climate reduces the likelihood and severity of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , “ Climate Change and Infectious Diseases , ” dismisses without scientific support the likelihood that warmer temperatures inhibit the spread of coronavirus , just as scientists know warm weather inhibits the spread of influenza .
Transmissible diseases like the flu and the coronavirus are far more prevalent during the late-fall , winter , and early spring , when the weather is cold and damp , rather than in the summer months when it is warm and dry .
Everyone knows the “ flu season ” runs from fall through early spring .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , are less common in the summer as well .
In fact , cold temperatures kill many more people globally than warm or hot temperatures .
In an article published in the Southern Medical Journal in 2004 , W. R. Keatinge and G. C. Donaldson noted : “ Cold-related deaths are far more numerous than heat-related deaths in the United States , Europe , and almost all countries outside the tropics , and almost all of them are due to common illnesses that are increased by cold.
” More recently in a study @ @ @ @ @ @ @ researchers examined health data from 384 locations in 13 countries , accounting for more than 74 million deaths , and found cold weather , directly or indirectly , killed 1,700 % more people than warm or hot weather .
Wyn also tells tall tales when he writes , “ climate change is causing widespread drought and desertification in much of the world , threatening the availability of water for consumption , food production , personal hygiene , and medical care , including for infectious disease.
” Yet the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supposed ‘ gold standard ’ of scientific consensus , finds no such link .
As reported in Climate at a Glance : Drought , “ The U.N. IPCC reports with ‘ high confidence ’ that precipitation has increased over mid-latitude land areas of the Northern Hemisphere ( including the United States ) during the past 70 years , while IPCC has “ low confidence ” about any negative trends globally .
( See here , p .
191 . )
” As reported by Climate Realism , this isn ’ t the first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coronavirus to promote climate change extremism and socialism .
In an address for the radical activist group Extinction Rebellion about coronavirus and climate change , Michael Marmot , a commission chairman at the WHO , praised massive government programs that will “ socialize the economy.
” Blaming pandemics on climate change may take attention away from the Chinese government ’ s culpability in the spread of coronavirus and the WHO ’ s incompetent response to coronavirus , but it advances shameful misinformation that is costing people their lives .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

WHO Official Claims Link Between Pandemic & Climate Change
Written by H Sterling Burnett
World Health Organization (WHO) officials are diverting attention away from the real causes of global pandemics and the Chinese government’s culpability in the spread of the Wuhan COVID-19 coronavirus by launching propaganda falsely linking pandemics to global warming.
In the latest example, WHO researcher Arthur Wyns authored an article in Scientific American falsely claiming climate change may “make the effects of a current or future pandemic worse.”
Overwhelming scientific evidence, however, shows a warmer climate reduces the likelihood and severity of epidemics and pandemics.
Wyns’ article, “Climate Change and Infectious Diseases,” dismisses without scientific support the likelihood that warmer temperatures inhibit the spread of coronavirus, just as scientists know warm weather inhibits the spread of influenza.
Transmissible diseases like the flu and the coronavirus are far more prevalent during the late-fall, winter, and early spring, when the weather is cold and damp, rather than in the summer months when it is warm and dry.
Everyone knows the “flu season” runs from fall through early spring. And colds, while not unheard of, are less common in the summer as well.
In fact, cold temperatures kill many more people globally than warm or hot temperatures.
In an article published in the Southern Medical Journal in 2004, W. R. Keatinge and G. C. Donaldson noted: “Cold-related deaths are far more numerous than heat-related deaths in the United States, Europe, and almost all countries outside the tropics, and almost all of them are due to common illnesses that are increased by cold.”
More recently in a study published in the Lancet in 2015, researchers examined health data from 384 locations in 13 countries, accounting for more than 74 million deaths, and found cold weather, directly or indirectly, killed 1,700{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} more people than warm or hot weather.
Wyn also tells tall tales when he writes, “climate change is causing widespread drought and desertification in much of the world, threatening the availability of water for consumption, food production, personal hygiene, and medical care, including for infectious disease.”
Yet the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the supposed ‘gold standard’ of scientific consensus, finds no such link.
As reported in Climate at a Glance: Drought, “The U.N. IPCC reports with ‘high confidence’ that precipitation has increased over mid-latitude land areas of the Northern Hemisphere (including the United States) during the past 70 years, while IPCC has “low confidence” about any negative trends globally. (See here, p. 191.)”
As reported by Climate Realism, this isn’t the first time that a WHO official exploited the coronavirus to promote climate change extremism and socialism.
In an address for the radical activist group Extinction Rebellion about coronavirus and climate change, Michael Marmot, a commission chairman at the WHO, praised massive government programs that will “socialize the economy.”
Blaming pandemics on climate change may take attention away from the Chinese government’s culpability in the spread of coronavirus and the WHO’s incompetent response to coronavirus, but it advances shameful misinformation that is costing people their lives.
Read more at Climate Realism
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-04-15--Shock! Israeli Study Reveals COVID19 Lockdown Was Pointless

Professor Yitzhak Ben Israel of Tel Aviv University , who also serves on the research and development advisory board for Teva Pharmaceutical Industries , plotted the rates of new coronavirus infections of the U.S. , U.K. , Sweden , Italy , Israel , Switzerland , France , Germany , and Spain .
The numbers told a shocking story : irrespective of whether the country quarantined like Israel , or went about business as usual like Sweden , coronavirus peaked and subsided in the exact same way .
In the exact , same , way .
His graphs show that all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , with the number of infected peaking in the sixth week and rapidly subsiding by the eighth week .
The Wuhan Virus follows its own pattern , he told Mako , an Israeli news agency .
It is a fixed pattern that is not dependent on freedom or quarantine .
“ There is a decline in the number of infections even [ in countries ] without closures , and it is similar to the countries with closures , ” he wrote in his paper .
“ Is the coronavirus expansion exponential ?
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no .
Expansion begins exponentially but fades quickly after about eight weeks , ” Professor Yitzhak Ben Israel concluded .
The reason why coronavirus follows a fixed pattern is yet unknown .
“ I have no explanation , ” he told Mako , “ There are is kinds of speculation : maybe it ’ s climate-related , maybe the virus has its own life cycle.
” But what about Italy and their staggering 12 % mortality rate ?
“ The health system in Italy has its own problems .
It has nothing to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also collapsed because of the flu , ” Professor Yitzhak Ben Israel told the news agency .
Indeed , Italy ’ s exceptionally high coronavirus mortality rate is eerily reminiscent of their unusually high flu mortality rates .
Supportive of this theory , Germany , has low flu infection and mortality rates and similarly low coronavirus rates .
Professor Yitzhak Ben Israel concludes in his analysis summary paper that the data from the past 50 days indicates that the closure policies of the quarantine countries can be replaced by more moderate social distancing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ support quarantine or economic closure .
On the reasonableness of Israel ’ s unprecedented quarantine and closure , he commented to the news agency , “ I think it ’ s mass hysteria .
I have no other way to describe it .
4,500 people die each year from the flu in Israel because of complications , so close the country because of that ?
No .
I don ’ t see a reason to do it because of a lower-risk epidemic.
” While the American policies remain less restrictive than those of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the origins of our own “ mass hysteria ” response .
President Trump urged a strong coronavirus response after consulting with Dr. Fauci and his team , who relied on a British model predicting 2.2 million deaths in the United States and 500,000 deaths in the U.K .
But that model was developed by Professor Neil Ferguson , who had a history of wildly overestimating death rates through his prediction models .
Professor Ferguson was not known for his reliability , and his 2001 disease model was criticized as “ not fit for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to 150,000 people could die in the U.K. from mad cow disease ( 177 deaths to date ) .
Ferguson ’ s U.K. coronavirus deaths prediction is now down to 20,000 people , 4 % of the original prediction .
Professor Yitzhak Ben Israel has mathematically shown us that coronavirus closures were a mistake .
It ’ s a tough reality .
Americans lost their jobs and businesses went under because the United States , along with most first world nations , acted on the chilling predictions of a severely flawed model , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tarot cards .
Hindsight is 20/20 , so we have to be realistic with our criticism .
President Trump did not want 2.2 million Americans to die and did what he thought was necessary to save our lives , relying on a model his advisors told him was trustworthy .
It ’ s done .
It happened .
But it doesn ’ t mean that he should continue the course .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Shock! Israeli Study Reveals COVID19 Lockdown Was Pointless
Written by Marina Medvin
Professor Yitzhak Ben Israel of Tel Aviv University, who also serves on the research and development advisory board for Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, plotted the rates of new coronavirus infections of the U.S., U.K., Sweden, Italy, Israel, Switzerland, France, Germany, and Spain.
The numbers told a shocking story: irrespective of whether the country quarantined like Israel, or went about business as usual like Sweden, coronavirus peaked and subsided in the exact same way. In the exact, same, way. His graphs show that all countries experienced seemingly identical coronavirus infection patterns, with the number of infected peaking in the sixth week and rapidly subsiding by the eighth week.
The Wuhan Virus follows its own pattern, he told Mako, an Israeli news agency. It is a fixed pattern that is not dependent on freedom or quarantine. “There is a decline in the number of infections even [in countries] without closures, and it is similar to the countries with closures,” he wrote in his paper.
“Is the coronavirus expansion exponential? The answer by the numbers is simple: no. Expansion begins exponentially but fades quickly after about eight weeks,” Professor Yitzhak Ben Israel concluded.
The reason why coronavirus follows a fixed pattern is yet unknown. “I have no explanation,” he told Mako, “There are is kinds of speculation: maybe it’s climate-related, maybe the virus has its own life cycle.”
But what about Italy and their staggering 12{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} mortality rate? “The health system in Italy has its own problems. It has nothing to do with coronavirus. In 2017 it also collapsed because of the flu,” Professor Yitzhak Ben Israel told the news agency.
Indeed, Italy’s exceptionally high coronavirus mortality rate is eerily reminiscent of their unusually high flu mortality rates. Supportive of this theory, Germany, has low flu infection and mortality rates and similarly low coronavirus rates.
Professor Yitzhak Ben Israel concludes in his analysis summary paper that the data from the past 50 days indicates that the closure policies of the quarantine countries can be replaced by more moderate social distancing policies. The numbers simply do not support quarantine or economic closure.
On the reasonableness of Israel’s unprecedented quarantine and closure, he commented to the news agency, “I think it’s mass hysteria. I have no other way to describe it. 4,500 people die each year from the flu in Israel because of complications, so close the country because of that? No. I don’t see a reason to do it because of a lower-risk epidemic.”
While the American policies remain less restrictive than those of Israel, it is important to understand the origins of our own “mass hysteria” response. President Trump urged a strong coronavirus response after consulting with Dr. Fauci and his team, who relied on a British model predicting 2.2 million deaths in the United States and 500,000 deaths in the U.K.
But that model was developed by Professor Neil Ferguson, who had a history of wildly overestimating death rates through his prediction models. Professor Ferguson was not known for his reliability, and his 2001 disease model was criticized as “not fit for purpose” after it predicted that up to 150,000 people could die in the U.K. from mad cow disease (177 deaths to date).
Ferguson’s U.K. coronavirus deaths prediction is now down to 20,000 people, 4{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of the original prediction.
Professor Yitzhak Ben Israel has mathematically shown us that coronavirus closures were a mistake. It’s a tough reality. Americans lost their jobs and businesses went under because the United States, along with most first world nations, acted on the chilling predictions of a severely flawed model, a reading of Professor Ferguson’s tarot cards. Hindsight is 20/20, so we have to be realistic with our criticism.
President Trump did not want 2.2 million Americans to die and did what he thought was necessary to save our lives, relying on a model his advisors told him was trustworthy. It’s done. It happened. But it doesn’t mean that he should continue the course.
Read more at townhall.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-04-15--Wireless Industry Confesses: ‘No Studies Show 5G Is Safe’

Last week , U.S .
Senator Richard Blumenthal grilled wireless industry representatives , who admitted the industry has done ZERO health & safety studies on 5G technology .
Meanwhile , dozens of independent studies indicates that 5G is a risk to all biological life .
During today ’ s Senate Commerce , Science , and Transportation Committee hearing on the future of 5G wireless technology and their impact on the American people and economy , U.S .
Senator Richard Blumenthal ( D-CT ) raised concerns with the lack of any scientific research and data on the technology ’ s potential @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Communications Commission ( FCC ) and the Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) — government agencies jointly-responsible for ensuring that cellphone technologies are safe to use — for failing to conduct any research into the safety of 5G technology , and instead , engaging in bureaucratic finger-pointing and deferring to industry .
In December 2018 , Blumenthal and U.S. Representative Anna G. Eshoo ( CA-18 ) sent a letter to FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr seeking answers regarding potential health risks posed by new 5G wireless technology .
At today ’ s hearing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ provide answers , and instead , just echoing , “ the general statements of the FDA , which shares regulatory responsibility for cell phones with the FCC.
” Blumenthal also decried the FDA ’ s statements as “ pretty unsatisfactory.
” A PDF of Carr ’ s complete response is available here .
During an exchange with wireless industry representatives , Blumenthal asked them whether they have supported research on the safety of 5G technology and potential links between radiofrequency and cancer , and the industry representatives conceded they have not .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , there basically is a cursory and superficial citation to existing scientific data saying ‘ The FDA has urged the cell phone industry to take a number of steps , including support additional research on possible biological effects of radio frequency fields for the type of signals emitted by cell phones.
’ “ I believe that Americans deserve to know what the health effects are , not to pre-judge what scientific studies may show , and they also deserve a commitment to do the research on outstanding questions.
” “ So my question @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the industry committed to supporting additional independent research — I stress independent — research ?
Is that independent research ongoing ?
Has any been completed ?
Where can consumers look for it ?
And we ’ re talking about research on the biological effects of this new technology.
” At the end of the exchange , Blumenthal concluded , “ So there really is no research ongoing .
We ’ re kind of flying blind here , as far as health and safety is concerned.
” In November 2018 , the National Toxicology @ @ @ @ @ @ @ longest and most expensive study to date on cellphones and cancer .
Those studies found “ some evidence ” of a link to cancer , at least in male rats .
However , the study only focused on the risks associated with 2G and 3G cell phones .
The latest 5G wireless technology relies on the deployment of many more new antennas and transmitters that are clustered lower to the ground and closer to homes and schools .
There has been even more limited research with respect to the health ramifications of 5G @ @ @ @ @ @ @ far failed to adequately explain how they have determined 5G is safe .
Senator Blumenthal is speaking to industry witnesses in the Senate hearing video : Letter from Blumenthal and Eshoo to FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr asking about the Safety of 5G Response from FCC Commissioner Carr to Blumenthal on 5G • Comments by : B. Blake Levitt , Communications Director , The BerkshireLitchfield Environmental Council , Invited Guest by U.S .
Senator Richard Blumenthal • News WTNH 8 “ Senator Blumenthal pushes to investigate link between 5G wireless tech and cancer ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Need To Know About 5G Wireless And “ Small ” Cells • Resources to Take Action on 5G • Dr. Martin Pall ’ s free e-book : “ 5G : Compelling Evidence for Eight Distinct Types of Great Harm Caused by Electromagnetic Field ( EMF ) Exposures and the Mechanism that Causes Them ” ( PDF , 90 pages ) • SaferEMR : Summary 400 new EMF scientific studies , Aug 2016 to present ( EMF in general ) Note : Several of the organizations listed below are still promoting actions limited to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ help .
With that being said , there is a resounding increase in awareness that a firmer response is now required .
• 5G Space Appeal : An International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and In Space ( sign it ) PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Wireless Industry Confesses: ‘No Studies Show 5G Is Safe’
Written by humansarefree.com
Last week, U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal grilled wireless industry representatives, who admitted the industry has done ZERO health & safety studies on 5G technology. Meanwhile, dozens of independent studies indicates that 5G is a risk to all biological life.
During today’s Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee hearing on the future of 5G wireless technology and their impact on the American people and economy, U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) raised concerns with the lack of any scientific research and data on the technology’s potential health risks.
Blumenthal blasted the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) — government agencies jointly-responsible for ensuring that cellphone technologies are safe to use — for failing to conduct any research into the safety of 5G technology, and instead, engaging in bureaucratic finger-pointing and deferring to industry.
In December 2018, Blumenthal and U.S. Representative Anna G. Eshoo (CA-18) sent a letter to FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr seeking answers regarding potential health risks posed by new 5G wireless technology.
At today’s hearing, Blumenthal criticized Carr for failing to provide answers, and instead, just echoing, “the general statements of the FDA, which shares regulatory responsibility for cell phones with the FCC.” Blumenthal also decried the FDA’s statements as “pretty unsatisfactory.” A PDF of Carr’s complete response is available here.
During an exchange with wireless industry representatives, Blumenthal asked them whether they have supported research on the safety of 5G technology and potential links between radiofrequency and cancer, and the industry representatives conceded they have not.
Blumenthal stated: “If you go to the FDA website, there basically is a cursory and superficial citation to existing scientific data saying ‘The FDA has urged the cell phone industry to take a number of steps, including support additional research on possible biological effects of radio frequency fields for the type of signals emitted by cell phones.’ “I believe that Americans deserve to know what the health effects are, not to pre-judge what scientific studies may show, and they also deserve a commitment to do the research on outstanding questions.” “So my question for you: How much money has the industry committed to supporting additional independent research — I stress independent — research? Is that independent research ongoing? Has any been completed? Where can consumers look for it? And we’re talking about research on the biological effects of this new technology.” At the end of the exchange, Blumenthal concluded, “So there really is no research ongoing. We’re kind of flying blind here, as far as health and safety is concerned.”
In November 2018, the National Toxicology Program released the final results of the longest and most expensive study to date on cellphones and cancer. Those studies found “some evidence” of a link to cancer, at least in male rats. However, the study only focused on the risks associated with 2G and 3G cell phones.
The latest 5G wireless technology relies on the deployment of many more new antennas and transmitters that are clustered lower to the ground and closer to homes and schools. There has been even more limited research with respect to the health ramifications of 5G technology, and the FCC has thus far failed to adequately explain how they have determined 5G is safe.
Additional Notes
Senator Blumenthal is speaking to industry witnesses in the Senate hearing video:
Mr. Brad Gillen, Vice President, CTIA
Mr. Steve Berry, President and CEO, Competitive Carriers Association
Mr. Shailen Bhatt, President and CEO, Intelligent Transportation Society of America
Mr. Michael Wessel, Commissioner, U.S.-China Economic & Security Review Commission
Ms. Kim Zentz, Chief Executive Officer, Urbanova
Letter from Blumenthal and Eshoo to FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr asking about the Safety of 5G
Response from FCC Commissioner Carr to Blumenthal on 5G
Resources From December Blumenthal Press Conference
Resources On 5G And Health:
Scientific Evidence
Grassroots Communities & Organizations
Note: Several of the organizations listed below are still promoting actions limited to contacting your elected representatives and pleading for help. With that being said, there is a resounding increase in awareness that a firmer response is now required.
Read more at humansarefree.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-04-15--What Terrible Coronavirus Models Tell Us About Global Warming Models

What Terrible Coronavirus Models Tell Us About Global Warming Models Let ’ s face it , the coronavirus models are terrible .
Not just off , but way , way , way off in their predictions of a doomsday scenario that never arrived .
What would America do without her precious experts ?
That ’ s not to say that over 20,000 dead Americans is not a heartbreaking reality .
That ’ s not even to say that parts of the country should not have been shut down .
But come on… We shut the entire country down using the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ IHME ) models , and in doing so put 17 million ( and counting ) Americans out of work , shattered 17 million ( and counting ) lives , and… Well , take a look for yourself below .
For the CNNLOL-impaired… That gigantic hump is the IHME ’ s April 1 prediction of coronavirus hospitalizations .
The smaller humps way , way , waaaay below that are the IMHE ’ s predictions of coronavirus hospitalizations after they were revised just a few days later on April 5 , 7 , and 9 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ number of hospitalizations , starting with the whole U.S. , and into the states .
Here ’ s the source of those figures .
So why does this matter ?
And why are we looking at hospitalizations ?
Well , remember , the whole reason for shutting down the economy was to ensure our healthcare system was not overloaded .
And it should be noted that these expert models are based on full mitigation , based on what did indeed happen , which was basically a full shutdown of the economy by way @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are still horribly , terribly wrong .
This , however , is not an argument about whether we should or should not have shut the country down , or only part of the country down .
I have plenty of thoughts on that particular subject , but we ’ ll leave that for another time .
What I want to focus is what is not arguable , and what is not arguable is that we shut the country down based on wildly flawed models .
If you want to argue we still should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ country based on what actually happened , that ’ s fine… And we might even agree more than disagree , but that ’ s not the point .
What is indisputable is that the models we used to shut down our economy are wildly wrong .
Even if you believe the correct decision was made , that does not change how wildly wrong the coronavirus models were , are , and will almost certainly continue to be .
That does not change the fact we shut down our entire economy based on incredibly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the models for global cooling global warming climate change or whatever the hell these proven frauds are calling it today .
Now I realize that the people who did the terribly flawed coronavirus models are not the same people who do the modeling for global cooling global warming climate change or whatever the hell these proven frauds are calling it today .
But hear me out… We ’ re still talking about “ experts ” our media and government grovel down to without question .
We ’ re still talking about models with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ life , our prosperity , our standard of living , and our individual freedoms to live our lives in whatever way we choose We ’ re still talking about models with the goal of handing a tremendously scary amount of authority and power to a centralized government .
But here ’ s the thing… The modeling for global cooling global warming climate change or whatever the hell these proven frauds are calling it today should be met with a helluva lot more skepticism than the coronavirus modeling .
The coronavirus modeling was based @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the time .
The experts doing the coronavirus models had all kinds of data on which to make their assumptions .
Not just reams and reams of scientific data based on previous pandemics , viruses , and human behavior ; but also real-time data on the coronavirus itself from China , Italy , and other countries… And they still blew it .
They still got it horribly wrong .
The models being used to predict global cooling global warming climate change or whatever the hell these proven frauds are calling it today @ @ @ @ @ @ @ week or next month , they are attempting to predict what will happen years from now , decades from now , and they are attempting to predict this based on , well , what exactly… ?
The earth is billions of years old .
The temperature cycles of the earth could take place over millions of years .
We already know the planet warmed all on its own three million years ago , that CO2 levels jumped three million years ago , which is about three million years before the internal combustion engine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ So when these proven frauds try to destroy your standard of living and centralize their political power using their global cooling global warming climate change or whatever the hell these proven frauds are calling it today , models , remember how terrible the “ expert ” coronavirus models are , and remember that the coronavirus “ experts ” had a whole lot more information to work with for their models than the modelers predicting global cooling global warming climate change or whatever the hell these proven frauds are calling it today .
PRINCIPIA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

What Terrible Coronavirus Models Tell Us About Global Warming Models
Written by John Nolte
Let’s face it, the coronavirus models are terrible. Not just off, but way, way, way off in their predictions of a doomsday scenario that never arrived.
Experts, experts, experts, y’all…
What would America do without her precious experts?
That’s not to say that over 20,000 dead Americans is not a heartbreaking reality. That’s not even to say that parts of the country should not have been shut down. But come on…
We shut the entire country down using the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) models, and in doing so put 17 million (and counting) Americans out of work, shattered 17 million (and counting) lives, and… Well, take a look for yourself below.
For the CNNLOL-impaired… That gigantic hump is the IHME’s April 1 prediction of coronavirus hospitalizations. The smaller humps way, way, waaaay below that are the IMHE’s predictions of coronavirus hospitalizations after they were revised just a few days later on April 5, 7, and 9.
The green line is the true number of hospitalizations, starting with the whole U.S., and into the states.
Here’s the source of those figures.
So why does this matter? And why are we looking at hospitalizations?
Well, remember, the whole reason for shutting down the economy was to ensure our healthcare system was not overloaded. And it should be noted that these expert models are based on full mitigation, based on what did indeed happen, which was basically a full shutdown of the economy by way of a lockdown. And these models are still horribly, terribly wrong.
This, however, is not an argument about whether we should or should not have shut the country down, or only part of the country down. I have plenty of thoughts on that particular subject, but we’ll leave that for another time. What I want to focus is what is not arguable, and what is not arguable is that we shut the country down based on wildly flawed models.
If you want to argue we still should have shut all or part of the country based on what actually happened, that’s fine… And we might even agree more than disagree, but that’s not the point. What is indisputable is that the models we used to shut down our economy are wildly wrong.
Even if you believe the correct decision was made, that does not change how wildly wrong the coronavirus models were, are, and will almost certainly continue to be. That does not change the fact we shut down our entire economy based on incredibly flawed models.
Which brings me to the models for global cooling global warming climate change or whatever the hell these proven frauds are calling it today.
Now I realize that the people who did the terribly flawed coronavirus models are not the same people who do the modeling for global cooling global warming climate change or whatever the hell these proven frauds are calling it today. But hear me out…
We’re still talking about “experts” our media and government grovel down to without question.
We’re still talking about models with the goal of destroying our way of life, our prosperity, our standard of living, and our individual freedoms to live our lives in whatever way we choose
We’re still talking about models with the goal of handing a tremendously scary amount of authority and power to a centralized government.
But here’s the thing… The modeling for global cooling global warming climate change or whatever the hell these proven frauds are calling it today should be met with a helluva lot more skepticism than the coronavirus modeling.
The coronavirus modeling was based on something real, on something happening at the time. The experts doing the coronavirus models had all kinds of data on which to make their assumptions. Not just reams and reams of scientific data based on previous pandemics, viruses, and human behavior; but also real-time data on the coronavirus itself from China, Italy, and other countries… And they still blew it. They still got it horribly wrong.
The models being used to predict global cooling global warming climate change or whatever the hell these proven frauds are calling it today, aren’t looking at next week or next month, they are attempting to predict what will happen years from now, decades from now, and they are attempting to predict this based on, well, what exactly…?
The earth is billions of years old. The temperature cycles of the earth could take place over millions of years. We already know the planet warmed all on its own three million years ago, that CO2 levels jumped three million years ago, which is about three million years before the internal combustion engine and plastic bottles and air conditioning.
So when these proven frauds try to destroy your standard of living and centralize their political power using their global cooling global warming climate change or whatever the hell these proven frauds are calling it today, models, remember how terrible the “expert” coronavirus models are, and remember that the coronavirus “experts” had a whole lot more information to work with for their models than the modelers predicting global cooling global warming climate change or whatever the hell these proven frauds are calling it today.
Read more at www.breitbart.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-04-14--Robert F Kennedy Jr’s Scathing Report on the Bill Gates Vaccine Plan

Vaccines , for Bill Gates , are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses ( including Microsoft ’ s ambition to control a global vaccination ID enterprise ) and give him dictatorial control of global health policy .
Gates ’ obsession with vaccines seems to be fueled by a conviction to save the world with technology .
Promising his share of $ 450 million of $ 1.2 billion to eradicate Polio , Gates took control of India ’ s National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization ( NTAGI ) which mandated up to 50 doses ( Table 1 ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to children before the age of five .
Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating non-polio acute flaccid paralysis ( NPAFP ) epidemic that paralyzed 490,000 children beyond expected rates between 2000 and 2017 .
In 2017 , the Indian government dialed back Gates ’ vaccine regimen and asked Gates and his vaccine policies to leave India .
NPAFP rates dropped precipitously .
In 2017 , the World Health Organization ( WHO ) reluctantly admitted that the global explosion in polio is predominantly vaccine strain .
The most frightening epidemics in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , are all linked to vaccines .
In fact , by 2018 , 70 % of global polio cases were vaccine strain .
During Gates ’ 2002 MenAfriVac campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa , Gates ’ operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis .
Approximately 50 of the 500 children vaccinated developed paralysis .
South African newspapers complained , “ We are guinea pigs for the drug makers.
” Nelson Mandela ’ s former Senior Economist , Professor Patrick Bond , describes Gates ’ philanthropic practices as “ ruthless and immoral.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Thomas Paine Podcast Below —

Robert F Kennedy Jr’s Scathing Report on the Bill Gates Vaccine Plan
Written by Robert F Kennedy Jr
Vaccines, for Bill Gates, are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses (including Microsoft’s ambition to control a global vaccination ID enterprise) and give him dictatorial control of global health policy.
Gates’ obsession with vaccines seems to be fueled by a conviction to save the world with technology.
Promising his share of $450 million of $1.2 billion to eradicate Polio, Gates took control of India’s National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization (NTAGI) which mandated up to 50 doses (Table 1) of polio vaccines through overlapping immunization programs to children before the age of five.
Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) epidemic that paralyzed 490,000 children beyond expected rates between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and asked Gates and his vaccine policies to leave India. NPAFP rates dropped precipitously.
In 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) reluctantly admitted that the global explosion in polio is predominantly vaccine strain. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, Afghanistan, and the Philippines, are all linked to vaccines. In fact, by 2018, 70{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of global polio cases were vaccine strain.
During Gates’ 2002 MenAfriVac campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates’ operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Approximately 50 of the 500 children vaccinated developed paralysis.
South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for the drug makers.” Nelson Mandela’s former Senior Economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates’ philanthropic practices as “ruthless and immoral.” – READ MORE
Listen to the insightful Thomas Paine Podcast Below —
Read more at truepundit.com
****
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-04-14--Bill Gates Admits His COVID19 Vaccine Will Kill or Ruin 700,000 Lives

Bill Gates Admits His COVID19 Vaccine Will Kill or Ruin 700,000 Lives WATCH Bill Gates SMILE As he Reveals How @ @ @ @ @ Kill Worldwide .
Former Microsoft owner and billionaire globalist , Bill Gates admits vaccines are @ @ @ @ @ and the planned international roll out of his COVID19 vaccine will likely kill or maim @ @ @ @ @ said with that indifferent smile of his .
Watch the video below – the key @ @ @ @ @ PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable @ @ @ @ @ 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our @ @ @ @ @ Scientific Method .

Bill Gates Admits His COVID19 Vaccine Will Kill or Ruin 700,000 Lives
Written by Next News Network
WATCH Bill Gates SMILE As he Reveals How Many People His Vaccine Will Kill Worldwide.
Former Microsoft owner and billionaire globalist, Bill Gates admits vaccines are less effective for older people and the planned international roll out of his COVID19 vaccine will likely kill or maim about 700.000 people. All said with that indifferent smile of his.
Watch the video below – the key admission occurs from 2:35/4:08:
More at www.bitchute.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-04-14--Key COVID19 Questions Ignored by Mainstream Media

Below are glaring questions about COVID19 that are not being addressed by the mainstream media .
It is incumbent on a responsible free press to look at and report on these concerns without further delay .
Answer – Imperial College .
But why is Boris taking advice from Neil Ferguson from Imperial College ?
A man who has continually produced falsely inflated and alarmist predictions about viruses in the past which have been totally debunked ?
Ferguson was the man behind alarmist research that sparked an unnecessary mass culling of farm animals during the 2001 epidemic of foot and mouth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pounds .
Ferguson will not open up the model for scrutiny , but our government is using the same model to justify the lockdown !
!
!
First of all he predicted 500,000 deaths .
Then he suddenly changed his figures DRASTICALLY , and said that the UK should have enough ICU beds and that the coronavirus will probably kill under 20,000 people in the U.K. – more than 1/2 of whom would have died by the end of the year in any case because they were so old and sick .
So @ @ @ @ @ @ @ expecting 10,000 deaths from covid-19 .
Boris is saying that 20,000 deaths would be a ‘ good ’ result , but this is misleading , because he is including the 10,000 who would be expected to die anyway .
https : //thefederalist.com/…/the-scientist-whose-doomsday-p…/ We are being told about covid-19 deaths , but not the number of deaths which would be expected to occur under normal circumstances .
Are covid deaths over and above what would normally be expected ?
Are they over and above the expected number of deaths from flu or pneumonia ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ statistically significant : https : //assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/…/Weekly_all_cause… When the number of deaths from covid is announced , there is the implication that they died as a direct result of covid .
However this is not the case .
A ‘ corona death ’ is where a corona infection was proven .
But also all those with underlying health problems infected by Covid-19 but for whom it ’ s not possible to say what killed them .
Finally , those not tested before death but suspected of Covid-19 are tested post-death , and if covid @ @ @ @ @ @ @ distinction between dying ‘ with ’ Covid-19 and dying ‘ due to ’ Covid-19 is not just splitting hairs .
Take these examples to illustrate the point – an 87-year-old woman with dementia in a nursing home ; a 79-year-old man with metastatic bladder cancer ; a 29-year-old man with leukaemia treated with chemotherapy ; a 46-year-old woman with motor neurone disease for 2 years .
All develop chest infections and die .
All test positive for Covid-19 .
Yet all were vulnerable to death by chest infection from any infective cause ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have been the final straw , but it has not caused their deaths .
Yet they will all be included in the ‘ covid deaths ’ .
So a lockdown of the population is justified on the basis of couitnting every death as a covid death , even if the patients were going to die anyway .
Unless we tighten the criteria for recording death due only to the virus ( as opposed to it being present in those who died from other conditions ) , the official figures may show a lot @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than is actually the case https : //www.spectator.co.uk/…/how-to-understand-and-report-… Two articles with opinions from experts , drowned out or disregarded by the mainstream narrative , offering their take on the coronavirus outbreak : https : //off-guardian.org/…/12-experts-questioning-the-coro…/ https : //off-guardian.org/…/10-more-experts-criticising-the…/ The media reporting is another issue .
Everyone knows that the media is bought and paid for , and that they lie , deceive and manipulate the public .
But for some reason , everyone seems to believe every they are reporting the exact truth when it comes to a ‘ pandemic ’ .
Why @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic ?
There is an agenda now to push the story that young people can die who have no underlying conditions .
The Guardian MADE UP a story about a 21 year old woman , and had to retract the story , explaining that she had actually died of a heart attack and that it had nothing to do with covid .
They have now pulled it completely .
An 18 year old boy was also falsely reported of dying with the virus .
But even after retracting these stories , the damage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the public .
The ‘ fear porn ’ has worked .
We hear reports on the news of hospitals being overrun and under pressure , and of course this is no doubt the case .
But reports are coming in about many hospitals that are empty , and staff are wondering where the cases are .
This video shows a reporter in Germany going to hospitals which were claimed to be inundated with cases , but finds there are none .
And in one of them , staff have been told that they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media .
Since when was the government bothered about your health and well-being ?
They have allowed thousands of people to die while waiting for benefits .
For years they have deliberately covered up serious health risks to the public – asbestos , tobacco , glyphosate…..why would they suddenly care now ?
Since when was the government bothered about protecting the NHS ?
It ’ s been completely decimated for years .
So for what other reasons would a pandemic be declared ?
Money , corruption , power and control .
To bring @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decades .
Collapse the global economy = poverty for all .
Get people policing their neighbours – already started .
A Universal Basic Income where everyone is dependent on the state ( when millions lose their homes and businesses , this can be rolled out ) .
A police state – has anyone noticed yet that we are now no longer living in a democracy ?
Mandatory vaccinations which can only be acceptable if the public are petrified of ‘ killer viruses ’ .
Next we will see the introduction of tracking of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of anyone who does not go along with the official narrative .
.And microchipping is not far down the line either .
This shutdown of the world is also being used by Telecomms companies to install 5G in schools where they know that they would get opposition .
This is actually going on right now in various parts of the UK .
A ‘ pandemic ’ can be declared for many reasons , but none of them are to do with the health and well-being of any of us .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Key COVID19 Questions Ignored by Mainstream Media
Written by Jill Kirkwood
Below are glaring questions about COVID19 that are not being addressed by the mainstream media. It is incumbent on a responsible free press to look at and report on these concerns without further delay.
𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 ‘𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘁 𝗮𝗱𝘃𝗶𝗰𝗲’ 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗮𝘀 𝗮 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻?
Answer – Imperial College. But why is Boris taking advice from Neil Ferguson from Imperial College? A man who has continually produced falsely inflated and alarmist predictions about viruses in the past which have been totally debunked?
Ferguson was the man behind alarmist research that sparked an unnecessary mass culling of farm animals during the 2001 epidemic of foot and mouth disease – which cost Britain billions of pounds.
Ferguson will not open up the model for scrutiny, but our government is using the same model to justify the lockdown!!! First of all he predicted 500,000 deaths. Then he suddenly changed his figures DRASTICALLY, and said that the UK should have enough ICU beds and that the coronavirus will probably kill under 20,000 people in the U.K. – more than 1/2 of whom would have died by the end of the year in any case because they were so old and sick.
So he is saying that we should be expecting 10,000 deaths from covid-19. Boris is saying that 20,000 deaths would be a ‘good’ result, but this is misleading, because he is including the 10,000 who would be expected to die anyway.
https://thefederalist.com/…/the-scientist-whose-doomsday-p…/
𝗡𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗳 𝗱𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗵𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻𝘁, 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗣𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰 𝗛𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗵 𝗘𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗱
We are being told about covid-19 deaths, but not the number of deaths which would be expected to occur under normal circumstances. Are covid deaths over and above what would normally be expected? Are they over and above the expected number of deaths from flu or pneumonia? PHE says that the number is not statistically significant:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/…/Weekly_all_cause…
𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗮 ‘𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗿𝘂𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗵’ 𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝘁?
When the number of deaths from covid is announced, there is the implication that they died as a direct result of covid. However this is not the case. A ‘corona death’ is where a corona infection was proven. But also all those with underlying health problems infected by Covid-19 but for whom it’s not possible to say what killed them. Finally, those not tested before death but suspected of Covid-19 are tested post-death, and if covid is found = corona death.
The distinction between dying ‘with’ Covid-19 and dying ‘due to’ Covid-19 is not just splitting hairs. Take these examples to illustrate the point – an 87-year-old woman with dementia in a nursing home; a 79-year-old man with metastatic bladder cancer; a 29-year-old man with leukaemia treated with chemotherapy; a 46-year-old woman with motor neurone disease for 2 years. All develop chest infections and die.
All test positive for Covid-19. Yet all were vulnerable to death by chest infection from any infective cause (including the flu). Covid-19 might have been the final straw, but it has not caused their deaths. Yet they will all be included in the ‘covid deaths’.
So a lockdown of the population is justified on the basis of couitnting every death as a covid death,even if the patients were going to die anyway. Unless we tighten the criteria for recording death due only to the virus (as opposed to it being present in those who died from other conditions), the official figures may show a lot more deaths apparently caused by the virus than is actually the case
https://www.spectator.co.uk/…/how-to-understand-and-report-…
𝗠𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗿𝗮𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗴𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗺𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗲:
Two articles with opinions from experts, drowned out or disregarded by the mainstream narrative, offering their take on the coronavirus outbreak:
https://off-guardian.org/…/12-experts-questioning-the-coro…/
https://off-guardian.org/…/10-more-experts-criticising-the…/
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮 – 𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗺, 𝘀𝗽𝗶𝗻, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘀
The media reporting is another issue. Everyone knows that the media is bought and paid for, and that they lie, deceive and manipulate the public. But for some reason, everyone seems to believe every they are reporting the exact truth when it comes to a ‘pandemic’. Why would it be any different with a pandemic?
There is an agenda now to push the story that young people can die who have no underlying conditions. The Guardian MADE UP a story about a 21 year old woman, and had to retract the story, explaining that she had actually died of a heart attack and that it had nothing to do with covid.
They have now pulled it completely.
An 18 year old boy was also falsely reported of dying with the virus. But even after retracting these stories, the damage has been done in the eyes of the public. The ‘fear porn’ has worked.
𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗱-𝟭𝟵 𝗰𝗮𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗵𝗼𝘀𝗽𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹𝘀 𝗲𝗺𝗽𝘁𝘆?
We hear reports on the news of hospitals being overrun and under pressure, and of course this is no doubt the case. But reports are coming in about many hospitals that are empty, and staff are wondering where the cases are. This video shows a reporter in Germany going to hospitals which were claimed to be inundated with cases, but finds there are none. And in one of them, staff have been told that they are not allowed to talk to the media.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/…/video-saying-there-is…/
𝗣𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗶𝗰𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗻𝘀
Since when was the government bothered about your health and well-being? They have allowed thousands of people to die while waiting for benefits. For years they have deliberately covered up serious health risks to the public – asbestos, tobacco, glyphosate…..why would they suddenly care now? Since when was the government bothered about protecting the NHS? It’s been completely decimated for years.
So for what other reasons would a pandemic be declared? Money, corruption, power and control. To bring forward agendas which have been planned for decades. Collapse the global economy = poverty for all. Get people policing their neighbours – already started.
The cashless society.
A Universal Basic Income where everyone is dependent on the state (when millions lose their homes and businesses, this can be rolled out). A police state – has anyone noticed yet that we are now no longer living in a democracy? Mandatory vaccinations which can only be acceptable if the public are petrified of ‘killer viruses’.
Next we will see the introduction of tracking of everyone via mandatory phone apps, censorship of anyone who does not go along with the official narrative. .And microchipping is not far down the line either. This shutdown of the world is also being used by Telecomms companies to install 5G in schools where they know that they would get opposition. This is actually going on right now in various parts of the UK. A ‘pandemic’ can be declared for many reasons, but none of them are to do with the health and well-being of any of us.
Read more at www.vigiliae.org
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-04-14--That Other Travesty of Science: The Ozone ‘Hole’

That Other Travesty of Science : The Ozone ‘ Hole ’ I am a former DuPont Chemical Engineer who worked predominately in heavy industrial chemicals ( now Chemours ) .
I receive particular satisfaction in debunking the travesties of science which have afflicted society .
It is all but impossible to obtain peer review , ( aka the Buddy System ) , to be published in any major technical journal .
My latest effort has addressed the bogus claims of man-made “ ozone depletion ” .
The ozone “ hole ” is really just a thinning .
Ozone is produced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ O2 to O3 .
Ozone is therefore not produced during the polar winters and is at its lowest level in the polar springtime .
It recovers during the sunlit summers .
In 1958 , Eugene Parker developed a theory showing how the Sun ’ s hot corona — by then known to be millions of degrees Fahrenheit — is so hot that it overcomes the Sun ’ s gravity and generates the solar wind , a stream of free protons and electrons ( plasma ) moving at speeds up to 1.8 million miles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Soviet spacecraft Luna 1 detected solar wind particles in space , and in 1962 the observations were confirmed by NASA ’ s Mariner 2 spacecraft .
The solar wind is deflected by the Earth ’ s magnetic field but such protection does not extend over the polar regions .
Ozone production varies from summer to winter but ozone is ripped off continuously .
Due to the vigorous circumpolar winds ( Antarctica ’ s polar vortex ) , the atmosphere above Antarctica is largely confined .
Any ozone produced in mid-latitude regions does @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Therefore , the thinning of the ozone is most pronounced at the South Pole .
The polar vortex of the Arctic wanders due to the different geography and topography , so mid-latitude ozone does bleed into the Arctic .
In the winter of 2019-2020 the northern polar vortex remained very stable and provided the same isolating conditions as the Antarctic .
The Arctic was particularly cold , setting record low temperatures in northern Greenland .
In 1957 , the British Antarctic Survey conducted balloon sampling of Antarctica ’ s atmosphere with a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ first clues that there was a seasonal thinning of the ozone layer .
This was the basis for laboratory work by Molina & Rowland and their 1974 paper about the destruction of ozone by chlorine or bromine .
It was just assumed that the chlorine and bromine in the Antarctic atmosphere came from chlorofluorocarbons ( CFCs ) , yet it is known that a great number of chlorine and bromine compounds are emitted from volcanoes — such as Antarctica ’ s Mt .
Erebus as published by Science Direct ’ s , Elsevier @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Antarctica ’ s ozone layer began in earnest in 1985 ( J.C. Farman , et al ) and continues today .
The seasonal waxing and waning are well documented .
The 1974 paper by Molina and Rowland was conducted in a laboratory and no solar wind blew thru their lab hood nor did they have volcanoes nor the downdrafts of a heavy rain storm in their lab hood observations .
Molina and Rowland developed the premise of a “ one dimensional diffusion model ” based upon Brownian motion .
That is , Molina @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which are 1.4 to 3.7x heavier than air , just go straight up .
In fact , any CFCs released at the surface just stay down here .
Moreover , Molina and Rowland stated that the CFCs are not soluble in water so rainwater would not scrub them out of the air .
Big deal .
Rains bring downdrafts .
CFC and several organics also adsorb on dust particles as well as aerosols .
Molina and Rowland were awarded the Nobel Prize for their pronouncement about CFCs and ozone destruction .
The cash @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
$ 900,000 .
The Nobel Prize can also serve as an excellent door stop or shim for a wobbly table .
Furthermore , Dr. Gordon Gribble of Dartmouth has catalogued thousands of naturally occurring chlorinated and brominated compounds , including CFCs emitted by volcanoes — even though it was claimed that CFCs are strictly man-made .
[ 2 ] It is known that Mt .
Erebus delivers chlorinated and brominated compounds in trace amounts over Antarctica .
Likewise , the volcanoes of Iceland deliver these halogenated compounds into the Arctic .
These @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there is always a trace equilibrium presence .
The Montreal Protocol to replace CFCs was established in 1987 .
All nations self-report and nobody can audit anybody .
All of the original Freons @ R are still produced in China and sold around the world .
The specific location is known from downwind sampling over the Pacific Ocean .
You can also buy any of these original refrigerants on eBay or Amazon .
[ 3.4 ] But Whoo-Hoo !
!
We have won the war on Chlorine and Bromine !
!
Now onto @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you declare war on elements of the Periodic Table , you gon na lose .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

That Other Travesty of Science: The Ozone ‘Hole’
Written by Richard F. Cronin BChE, MBA, Prof. Engr.
image source: earthhow.com
I am a former DuPont Chemical Engineer who worked predominately in heavy industrial chemicals (now Chemours). I receive particular satisfaction in debunking the travesties of science which have afflicted society.
It is all but impossible to obtain peer review, (aka the Buddy System), to be published in any major technical journal.
My latest effort has addressed the bogus claims of man-made “ozone depletion”.
The ozone “hole” is really just a thinning. Ozone is produced by solar radiation at stratospheric elevations converting O2 to O3. Ozone is therefore not produced during the polar winters and is at its lowest level in the polar springtime. It recovers during the sunlit summers.
In 1958, Eugene Parker developed a theory showing how the Sun’s hot corona — by then known to be millions of degrees Fahrenheit — is so hot that it overcomes the Sun’s gravity and generates the solar wind, a stream of free protons and electrons (plasma) moving at speeds up to 1.8 million miles per hour.
A year later, the Soviet spacecraft Luna 1 detected solar wind particles in space, and in 1962 the observations were confirmed by NASA’s Mariner 2 spacecraft.
The solar wind is deflected by the Earth’s magnetic field but such protection does not extend over the polar regions. Ozone production varies from summer to winter but ozone is ripped off continuously.
Due to the vigorous circumpolar winds (Antarctica’s polar vortex), the atmosphere above Antarctica is largely confined. Any ozone produced in mid-latitude regions does not bleed into the stratosphere over Antarctica. Therefore, the thinning of the ozone is most pronounced at the South Pole. The polar vortex of the Arctic wanders due to the different geography and topography, so mid-latitude ozone does bleed into the Arctic.
In the winter of 2019-2020 the northern polar vortex remained very stable and provided the same isolating conditions as the Antarctic. The Arctic was particularly cold, setting record low temperatures in northern Greenland.
In 1957, the British Antarctic Survey conducted balloon sampling of Antarctica’s atmosphere with a Dobson Spectrophotometer. These measurements gave the first clues that there was a seasonal thinning of the ozone layer. This was the basis for laboratory work by Molina & Rowland and their 1974 paper about the destruction of ozone by chlorine or bromine. It was just assumed that the chlorine and bromine in the Antarctic atmosphere came from chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), yet it is known that a great number of chlorine and bromine compounds are emitted from volcanoes — such as Antarctica’s Mt. Erebus as published by Science Direct’s, Elsevier. [1]
Routine monitoring of Antarctica’s ozone layer began in earnest in 1985 (J.C. Farman, et al) and continues today. The seasonal waxing and waning are well documented.
The 1974 paper by Molina and Rowland was conducted in a laboratory and no solar wind blew thru their lab hood nor did they have volcanoes nor the downdrafts of a heavy rain storm in their lab hood observations. Molina and Rowland developed the premise of a “one dimensional diffusion model” based upon Brownian motion.
That is, Molina and Rowland stated that the CFCs, which are 1.4 to 3.7x heavier than air, just go straight up.
In fact, any CFCs released at the surface just stay down here. Moreover, Molina and Rowland stated that the CFCs are not soluble in water so rainwater would not scrub them out of the air. Big deal. Rains bring downdrafts. CFC and several organics also adsorb on dust particles as well as aerosols.
Molina and Rowland were awarded the Nobel Prize for their pronouncement about CFCs and ozone destruction. The cash award for the Nobel Prize is approx. $900,000. The Nobel Prize can also serve as an excellent door stop or shim for a wobbly table.
Furthermore, Dr. Gordon Gribble of Dartmouth has catalogued thousands of naturally occurring chlorinated and brominated compounds, including CFCs emitted by volcanoes — even though it was claimed that CFCs are strictly man-made. [2]
It is known that Mt. Erebus delivers chlorinated and brominated compounds in trace amounts over Antarctica. Likewise, the volcanoes of Iceland deliver these halogenated compounds into the Arctic. These heavy compounds just drift back down although there is always a trace equilibrium presence.
The Montreal Protocol to replace CFCs was established in 1987. All nations self-report and nobody can audit anybody. All of the original Freons@R are still produced in China and sold around the world. The specific location is known from downwind sampling over the Pacific Ocean.
You can also buy any of these original refrigerants on eBay or Amazon. [3.4]
But Whoo-Hoo !! We have won the war on Chlorine and Bromine !! Now onto the war on Carbon !!
If you declare war on elements of the Periodic Table, you gonna lose.
[1] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231015304246
[2] https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783211993224
[3] https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02109-2
[4] https://www.ebay.com/p/1232730084
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related