principiascientificinternational--2020-10-22--COVID Test Scam: Cycle Threshold Values Being Deliberately Omitted

Since the beginning of the CCP ( Chinese Communist Party ) virus pandemic , policymakers in the United States have relied heavily on the daily positive cases—confirmed by an RT-PCR test—in their policy decisions regarding when states can fully reopen .
With infection rate being such a major criterion in determining when these states can reopen , it is paramount for test centers to report not only the positive test result of a PCR test , but also the cycle threshold ( Ct ) value that measures the viral load .
The cycle threshold value is the number of amplifications @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the virus ’ s genetic material , providing valuable information on whether a person is infectious or at risk of severe symptoms from COVID-19 .
“ The lower the number of cycles , the more of the virus is present , ” Dr. William W. Li , an internationally renowned physician , scientist , and author of New York Times bestseller “ Eat to Beat Disease : The New Science of How Your Body Can Heal Itself , ” told The Epoch Times in an earlier interview .
“ The higher the number @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the virus , the less is present.
” Knowing the cycle threshold of a PCR test allows government and public health officials to better gauge if there is a serious spread of the virus occurring in an area and take appropriate action , instead of only resorting to lockdowns .
While proponents of lockdowns say that it plays a role in slowing the spread of COVID-19 , many others , including prominent experts , are warning against such extreme measures .
Dr. David Nabarro , the World Health Organization ’ s ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ urged world leaders to not use lockdowns “ as the primary means of control of this virus , ” in an interview with The Spectator earlier this month .
“ The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganize , regroup , rebalance your resources , protect your health workers who are exhausted , but by and large , we ’ d rather not do it , ” Nabarro said .
More than 40,000 medical practitioners and scientists from around the world who agree with Nabarro @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which states that “ current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health .
The results ( to name a few ) include lower childhood vaccination rates , worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes , fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health—leading to greater excess mortality in years to come , with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden.
” The declaration also garnered the support of over 500,000 citizens concerned with the numerous negative effects of the lockdowns .
Concerns of fake names signing the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the declaration .
They wrote on the website , “ The fake signatures are less than 1 percent of the total , and most have been removed from the count tracker.
” White House officials told reporters in a conference call on Oct. 12 that the president ’ s policy—centered around protecting the high-risk elderly and vulnerable , opening schools , and restoring society—aligned with what “ top epidemiologists and health policy experts have been saying—that is , lockdowns do not eliminate the virus ; lockdowns are extremely harmful.
” There is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the PCR tests being used throughout the country for a positive diagnosis , as the federal government does not make that decision .
A spokesperson for the CDC wrote in an email to The Epoch Times that , “ The Ct cutoffs for various PCR-based assays are defined as part of each test ’ s FDA emergency use agreements ( EUAS ) —they are specific to each test.
” “ In general , CDC does not develop Ct cutoff guidance as this is typically innate to the tests ( some of which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s guidance is around the original assay that our lab developed.
” The threshold value cutoff for the CDC ’ s PCR test is 40 cycles , a value that many medical experts believe returns false positives , as fragments of a killed virus may be picked up .
The cycle threshold cutoff for many of the manufacturers of PCR tests in the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics ‘ independent evaluation of various PCR tests is set at around 40 cycles for a positive sample .
In a document [ pdf ] from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the cycle threshold value cutoff for the PCR test used in the state was revealed to be 42 cycles .
When asked about the high cycle threshold cutoff value , Kristi Zears , director of communications at the Kansas Department of Health and Environment , told The Epoch Times in an email , “ The Ct value is determined by the manufacturer of each test to maximize the sensitivity of the respective test .
We have used and continue to have multiple systems being used that may have different cutoffs , but all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ absence of the virus.
” What the cycle threshold cutoff value should be varies in discussions among the scientific community , but generally ranges between 25 and 30 with agreement that patients can not be contagious above these numbers .
Two earlier studies that successfully cultured the CCP virus from positive samples , found a correlation between virus viability in cell culture and cycle threshold value of a PRC test .
One study of 90 positive COVID-19 samples , showed “ no positive viral cultures with a Ct greater than 24 or STT @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than 8 days .
The odds of a positive culture were decreased by 32 % for each unit increase in Ct. ” Another viral culture study of 183 positive samples from 155 patients from the Méditerranée Infection University Hospital Institute in Marseille , France , reported that patients with threshold values at 34 or above did not “ excrete infectious viral particles.
” The study also showed that infectiousness was greater with Ct values of 13-17 , while at a 33 Ct , the culture positivity rate was only 12 percent .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Infectious Diseases , researchers examined 3790 positive COVID-19 samples with known Ct values to find if any could be cultured in vitro .
They found that for samples with Ct values of 25 or below , around 70 percent could be cultured , meaning that a higher viral load is correlated with being more contagious .
PCR tests are known for their sensitivity to detect the smallest virus particle , regardless of whether it is a live or nonviable virus , and amplify it millions of times , which can then result in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ guidance for healthcare workers , the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) said that data shows “ that if the person who has recovered from COVID-19 is retested within 3 months of initial infection , they may continue to have a positive test result , even though they are not spreading COVID-19.
” Dr. Christy Risinger , an Internal Medicine physician in Texas , says in a video about COVID-19 testing , “ PCR , as I mentioned , looks for fragments of RNA , so it ’ s very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sensitive for COVID-19.
” “ We know that after about one week of infection from SARS-CoV-2 , people are no longer infectious to others , but they still will be positive with PCR testing because they ’ ll still have bits of the virus within their body.
” SARS-CoV-2 is another name for the CCP virus that causes COVID-19 .
According to a case report , a patient continued to test positive on a PCR test for 62 days after symptom onset , although the “ virus could not be isolated after the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ study , a registered nurse tested positive for COVID-19 for 29 days , while she had been asymptomatic for 23 days after symptom onset .
She was only able to return to work after she was determined noninfectious since her last PCR test had a CT value of 38 .
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

COVID Test Scam: Cycle Threshold Values Being Deliberately Omitted
Written by Meiling Lee
Since the beginning of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus pandemic, policymakers in the United States have relied heavily on the daily positive cases—confirmed by an RT-PCR test—in their policy decisions regarding when states can fully reopen.
With infection rate being such a major criterion in determining when these states can reopen, it is paramount for test centers to report not only the positive test result of a PCR test, but also the cycle threshold (Ct) value that measures the viral load.
The cycle threshold value is the number of amplifications it takes the test machine to detect the virus’s genetic material, providing valuable information on whether a person is infectious or at risk of severe symptoms from COVID-19.
“The lower the number of cycles, the more of the virus is present,” Dr. William W. Li, an internationally renowned physician, scientist, and author of New York Times bestseller “Eat to Beat Disease: The New Science of How Your Body Can Heal Itself,” told The Epoch Times in an earlier interview. “The higher the number of cycles needed to pick up signs of the virus, the less is present.”
Knowing the cycle threshold of a PCR test allows government and public health officials to better gauge if there is a serious spread of the virus occurring in an area and take appropriate action, instead of only resorting to lockdowns.
While proponents of lockdowns say that it plays a role in slowing the spread of COVID-19, many others, including prominent experts, are warning against such extreme measures.
Dr. David Nabarro, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Special Envoy on COVID-19, urged world leaders to not use lockdowns “as the primary means of control of this virus,” in an interview with The Spectator earlier this month.
“The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganize, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we’d rather not do it,” Nabarro said.
More than 40,000 medical practitioners and scientists from around the world who agree with Nabarro have signed the Great Barrington Declaration, which states that “current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health—leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden.”
The declaration also garnered the support of over 500,000 citizens concerned with the numerous negative effects of the lockdowns.
Concerns of fake names signing the declaration are being addressed by the authors of the declaration. They wrote on the website, “The fake signatures are less than 1 percent of the total, and most have been removed from the count tracker.”
White House officials told reporters in a conference call on Oct. 12 that the president’s policy—centered around protecting the high-risk elderly and vulnerable, opening schools, and restoring society—aligned with what “top epidemiologists and health policy experts have been saying—that is, lockdowns do not eliminate the virus; lockdowns are extremely harmful.”
No Standard Cycle Threshold Value
There is no universal standard cutoff cycle threshold value for the PCR tests being used throughout the country for a positive diagnosis, as the federal government does not make that decision.
A spokesperson for the CDC wrote in an email to The Epoch Times that, “The Ct cutoffs for various PCR-based assays are defined as part of each test’s FDA emergency use agreements (EUAS)—they are specific to each test.”
“In general, CDC does not develop Ct cutoff guidance as this is typically innate to the tests (some of which are likely proprietary). CDC’s guidance is around the original assay that our lab developed.”
The threshold value cutoff for the CDC’s PCR test is 40 cycles, a value that many medical experts believe returns false positives, as fragments of a killed virus may be picked up.
The cycle threshold cutoff for many of the manufacturers of PCR tests in the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics‘ independent evaluation of various PCR tests is set at around 40 cycles for a positive sample.
In a document [pdf] from the Kansas Health and Environment Laboratories, the cycle threshold value cutoff for the PCR test used in the state was revealed to be 42 cycles.
When asked about the high cycle threshold cutoff value, Kristi Zears, director of communications at the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, told The Epoch Times in an email, “The Ct value is determined by the manufacturer of each test to maximize the sensitivity of the respective test. We have used and continue to have multiple systems being used that may have different cutoffs, but all have been validated to determine presence or absence of the virus.”
What the cycle threshold cutoff value should be varies in discussions among the scientific community, but generally ranges between 25 and 30 with agreement that patients cannot be contagious above these numbers.
Two earlier studies that successfully cultured the CCP virus from positive samples, found a correlation between virus viability in cell culture and cycle threshold value of a PRC test.
One study of 90 positive COVID-19 samples, showed “no positive viral cultures with a Ct greater than 24 or STT [symptom onset to test] greater than 8 days. The odds of a positive culture were decreased by 32% for each unit increase in Ct.”
Another viral culture study of 183 positive samples from 155 patients from the Méditerranée Infection University Hospital Institute in Marseille, France, reported that patients with threshold values at 34 or above did not “excrete infectious viral particles.” The study also showed that infectiousness was greater with Ct values of 13-17, while at a 33 Ct, the culture positivity rate was only 12 percent.
In the most recent study published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, researchers examined 3790 positive COVID-19 samples with known Ct values to find if any could be cultured in vitro. They found that for samples with Ct values of 25 or below, around 70 percent could be cultured, meaning that a higher viral load is correlated with being more contagious.
PCR Test Sensitivity Leads to False Positives
PCR tests are known for their sensitivity to detect the smallest virus particle, regardless of whether it is a live or nonviable virus, and amplify it millions of times, which can then result in an overdiagnosis of COVID-19.
In updated guidance for healthcare workers, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said that data shows “that if the person who has recovered from COVID-19 is retested within 3 months of initial infection, they may continue to have a positive test result, even though they are not spreading COVID-19.”
Dr. Christy Risinger, an Internal Medicine physician in Texas, says in a video about COVID-19 testing, “PCR, as I mentioned, looks for fragments of RNA, so it’s very sensitive, but it may be overly sensitive for COVID-19.”
“We know that after about one week of infection from SARS-CoV-2, people are no longer infectious to others, but they still will be positive with PCR testing because they’ll still have bits of the virus within their body.”
SARS-CoV-2 is another name for the CCP virus that causes COVID-19.
According to a case report, a patient continued to test positive on a PCR test for 62 days after symptom onset, although the “virus could not be isolated after the 18th day.”
In a different case study, a registered nurse tested positive for COVID-19 for 29 days, while she had been asymptomatic for 23 days after symptom onset. She was only able to return to work after she was determined noninfectious since her last PCR test had a CT value of 38.
Emel Akan contributed to this report.
Read more at www.theepochtimes.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-22--Reflections on Radiated Force & Internal Force

Let ’ s begin be clarifying what is meant by force .
A force is a property of one object able to produce an action in another object without being in contact with that object .
The force exists in a field around an object that decreases with distance from the object .
The forces can either produce an attraction between the objects or repulsion between the objects , which is determined by the orientation of the forces of the objects .
When a magnet approaches the opposite pole of another magnet their forces combine to form a larger magnet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ field .
As similar poles of the magnets approach each other their radiated magnetic force and fields decrease as the repelling force between them increases .
The magnetic force is being converted from a radiated force to an internal force between the magnets .
In the case of the electrical forces and fields as opposite charges approach each other the radiated electric fields and forces decrease , which is the opposite reaction than that of the magnetic force .
When an electron and proton combine to form a neutron their positive and negative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ forces becomes an internal force between the opposite charges .
Their electric forces still exist but are not detected as a radiated force .
Their continued existence is shown when a neutron outside an atom ’ s nucleus decomposes back into an electron and proton , with their normal charges and fields , and a gamma ray .
This leads to questions on how a star , which is combining electrons and protons to form neutrons , could be radiating energy into space when that force has become an internal force with shrinking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
As the distance between similar charges decreases the radiated electric force and field increases , which is again an opposite action to that of the magnetic force .
It seems to be inaccurate to consider them as one electromagnetic force when they have opposite behavior .
The properties and structure of object in the universe are the result of the interaction of the two forces .
The size of an object is not the size of its matter but the size of the fields it radiates .
The forces radiated from an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ encounter a force field emitted by another object of equal strength .
The radiation from the object will not stop but it no longer produces a decrease in the force being emitted by the object .
The force field from one object stops and the force field of the other object begins .
The behavior of the radiated forces resembles reflection where an object strikes and then reverses direction , but in this case there is no reversal of direction just the continuation of a radiated force from another object .
An objects @ @ @ @ @ @ @ emitted by it neighbors and unlike its matter , continuously changes as it moves and its neighbor moves .
The distance from the Earth to the sun is not 140 X10^6 km but the distance where the Earth ’ s radiated attractive field equals the sun ’ s radiated attractive field .
The size of the Earth opposite the sun extends until the Earth ’ s radiated attractive field equals the sun ’ s radiated attractive field .
The size of the sun and its satellites extends until its fields encounter and equal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Absolute zero is where an object produces no radiated forces but there still exist the internal forces that hold the nucleus of atoms together , cause electrons to move , and bonds between atoms to exist .
Even at absolute zero objects contain energy that exists as internal forces that can potentially be converted into radiated energy .
The destruction of atoms releasing the internal forces forming the atom shows how internal forces can become radiated forces .
The atom is formed from the opposite action of the two forces .
The attractive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attracted to the positive electric force ( proton ) with greater power than the negative electric force ( electron ) allowing it to displace electrons .
This attractive force is radiated from the nucleus of the atom causing electrons to be located at distances from the nucleus where their attraction to the protons in the nucleus is equal to the decreasing attractive force .
The nucleus is held together both by the internal attractive force between electrons and protons it contains and the compression by the attractive force on its exterior , there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are not enough protons in the nucleus to form a shell around it , an electron can be exposed on its surface allowing the attractive force to dislodge it resulting in beta decay of the nucleus .
If there are too few internal electrons , the repelling force between protons will create gaps in the nucleus ’ s surface allowing the attractive force to split the nucleus into smaller elements including hydrogen ( neutron emission ) or helium ( alpha decay ) .
The alpha particle is stable because the internal electrons are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ while the neutron is unstable because the attractive force is able to dislodge the exposed electron , overcoming the internal electric force converting the neutron into a hydrogen atom .
Radioactive decay of atoms and the burning of the sun are the same process resulting from the attractive force dislodging electrons by overcoming the attractive internal electric force with hydrogen and helium being the ashes resulting from the destruction of the internal electric force converting it to a radiated force .
The radiated attractive force ( gravity and magnetism ( which is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nucleus cause objects to be pulled closer together , increasing the radiated attractive force and its fields while the internal attractive force between the objects decreases .
At the same time as the internal attraction decreases ( since the electrons are surrounding the nucleus ) the radiated repelling electric force between the similarly charged electrons of the atoms increases , keeping the objects from merging into a single unit .
A covalent chemical bond is formed when a gap in the surrounding electrons allows the attractive force to pull the separate atoms closer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the repelling radiated electric force equals the radiated attractive force a stable larger structure is formed with its own radiated attractive and electric forces and fields .
These fields from larger objects can then interact with other objects to form larger structures resulting in the creation of planets , solar systems and galaxies .
It is the fields of object ’ s forces that interact , not the object ’ s matter .
Once equilibrium between objects is established any change in one object ’ s fields will be transmitted to all the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ increase it the radiated attractive force of an object will cause the attractive field of adjacent objects to move towards it .
This , in turn , will cause an increase in the repelling electric force between the two objects and , as the change in attractive force decreases as it is transmitted to other objects fields , the repelling electric force will re-establish equilibrium .
This is the transmission of electromagnetic wave and the speed of these waves is determined by the strength of the attractive force , which in turn determines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ As the strength of the radiated attractive force between objects decreases the wavelength of the field disturbances increases .
The longer the wavelength of an electromagnetic wave the smaller the energy ( force ) it carries .
The balance of radiated forces and internal forces can be seen in water .
As energy is added to 0 C ice , it is converted into 0 C water as the internal force forming the crystal structure are broken , without additional radiated energy being transmitted to the thermometer .
As further energy is added @ @ @ @ @ @ @ absorbing some of the energy and not registering on the thermometer as radiated energy .
The formation of different structures causes the size of the calorie ( the energy needed to raise the temperature of 1 gram of water by 1 C ) changes depending on the existing temperature and structure of the water .
When the temperature of the water reaches 100 C instead of the energy being radiated as increasing temperature or forming new internal structures it begins to reverse the process breaking the internal bonds that were previously formed .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ all the internal bonds are broken and the water converts to 100 C steam .
Internal forces between bonds in a molecule can absorb energy independent of the whole molecule .
When ultraviolet light transfers energy to an oxygen molecule it causes a vibration across the bond .
Eventually it absorbs enough radiated energy ( 450,000 joules/mole ) to break the double bond and the energy is converted into kinetic energy of the individual oxygen atoms .
After the atoms radiate energy to the surrounding force fields ( in a different wavelength than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ convert radiated force into an internal force reforming the oxygen molecule .
When considering the conservation of energy the internal energy that can not be detected must be considered as well as the radiated energy .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Reflections on Radiated Force & Internal Force
Written by Herb Rose
Let’s begin be clarifying what is meant by force. A force is a property of one object able to produce an action in another object without being in contact with that object. The force exists in a field around an object that decreases with distance from the object.
The forces can either produce an attraction between the objects or repulsion between the objects, which is determined by the orientation of the forces of the objects.
When a magnet approaches the opposite pole of another magnet their forces combine to form a larger magnet which radiates a larger magnetic force and field. As similar poles of the magnets approach each other their radiated magnetic force and fields decrease as the repelling force between them increases. The magnetic force is being converted from a radiated force to an internal force between the magnets.
In the case of the electrical forces and fields as opposite charges approach each other the radiated electric fields and forces decrease, which is the opposite reaction than that of the magnetic force. When an electron and proton combine to form a neutron their positive and negative fields shrink and the radiation of electric forces becomes an internal force between the opposite charges.
Their electric forces still exist but are not detected as a radiated force. Their continued existence is shown when a neutron outside an atom’s nucleus decomposes back into an electron and proton, with their normal charges and fields, and a gamma ray. This leads to questions on how a star, which is combining electrons and protons to form neutrons, could be radiating energy into space when that force has become an internal force with shrinking electric fields rather than a radiated force.
As the distance between similar charges decreases the radiated electric force and field increases, which is again an opposite action to that of the magnetic force. It seems to be inaccurate to consider them as one electromagnetic force when they have opposite behavior. The properties and structure of object in the universe are the result of the interaction of the two forces.
The size of an object is not the size of its matter but the size of the fields it radiates. The forces radiated from an object will spread and decrease until they encounter a force field emitted by another object of equal strength. The radiation from the object will not stop but it no longer produces a decrease in the force being emitted by the object. The force field from one object stops and the force field of the other object begins. The behavior of the radiated forces resembles reflection where an object strikes and then reverses direction, but in this case there is no reversal of direction just the continuation of a radiated force from another object.
An objects size is determined by the force fields emitted by it neighbors and unlike its matter, continuously changes as it moves and its neighbor moves. The distance from the Earth to the sun is not 140 X10^6 km but the distance where the Earth’s radiated attractive field equals the sun’s radiated attractive field. The size of the Earth opposite the sun extends until the Earth’s radiated attractive field equals the sun’s radiated attractive field. The size of the sun and its satellites extends until its fields encounter and equal field from a neighboring solar system.
Absolute zero is where an object produces no radiated forces but there still exist the internal forces that hold the nucleus of atoms together, cause electrons to move, and bonds between atoms to exist. Even at absolute zero objects contain energy that exists as internal forces that can potentially be converted into radiated energy. The destruction of atoms releasing the internal forces forming the atom shows how internal forces can become radiated forces.
The atom is formed from the opposite action of the two forces. The attractive force (gravity and magnetic) is attracted to the positive electric force (proton) with greater power than the negative electric force (electron) allowing it to displace electrons. This attractive force is radiated from the nucleus of the atom causing electrons to be located at distances from the nucleus where their attraction to the protons in the nucleus is equal to the decreasing attractive force.
The nucleus is held together both by the internal attractive force between electrons and protons it contains and the compression by the attractive force on its exterior, there are no nuclear forces. If there are not enough protons in the nucleus to form a shell around it, an electron can be exposed on its surface allowing the attractive force to dislodge it resulting in beta decay of the nucleus.
If there are too few internal electrons, the repelling force between protons will create gaps in the nucleus’s surface allowing the attractive force to split the nucleus into smaller elements including hydrogen (neutron emission) or helium (alpha decay).
The alpha particle is stable because the internal electrons are shielded from the attractive force by protons while the neutron is unstable because the attractive force is able to dislodge the exposed electron, overcoming the internal electric force converting the neutron into a hydrogen atom.
Radioactive decay of atoms and the burning of the sun are the same process resulting from the attractive force dislodging electrons by overcoming the attractive internal electric force with hydrogen and helium being the ashes resulting from the destruction of the internal electric force converting it to a radiated force.
The radiated attractive force (gravity and magnetism (which is a directional attractive force)) surrounding the nucleus cause objects to be pulled closer together, increasing the radiated attractive force and its fields while the internal attractive force between the objects decreases.
At the same time as the internal attraction decreases (since the electrons are surrounding the nucleus) the radiated repelling electric force between the similarly charged electrons of the atoms increases, keeping the objects from merging into a single unit. A covalent chemical bond is formed when a gap in the surrounding electrons allows the attractive force to pull the separate atoms closer forming a larger molecule unit.
When the repelling radiated electric force equals the radiated attractive force a stable larger structure is formed with its own radiated attractive and electric forces and fields. These fields from larger objects can then interact with other objects to form larger structures resulting in the creation of planets, solar systems and galaxies. It is the fields of object’s forces that interact, not the object’s matter.
Once equilibrium between objects is established any change in one object’s fields will be transmitted to all the adjacent fields of other objects. An increase it the radiated attractive force of an object will cause the attractive field of adjacent objects to move towards it. This, in turn, will cause an increase in the repelling electric force between the two objects and, as the change in attractive force decreases as it is transmitted to other objects fields, the repelling electric force will re-establish equilibrium.
This is the transmission of electromagnetic wave and the speed of these waves is determined by the strength of the attractive force, which in turn determines the strength of the electric field. As the strength of the radiated attractive force between objects decreases the wavelength of the field disturbances increases. The longer the wavelength of an electromagnetic wave the smaller the energy (force) it carries.
The balance of radiated forces and internal forces can be seen in water. As energy is added to 0 C ice, it is converted into 0 C water as the internal force forming the crystal structure are broken, without additional radiated energy being transmitted to the thermometer. As further energy is added internal structures in the water are formed absorbing some of the energy and not registering on the thermometer as radiated energy.
The formation of different structures causes the size of the calorie (the energy needed to raise the temperature of 1 gram of water by 1 C) changes depending on the existing temperature and structure of the water. When the temperature of the water reaches 100 C instead of the energy being radiated as increasing temperature or forming new internal structures it begins to reverse the process breaking the internal bonds that were previously formed. After an additional 540 calories/gram is added all the internal bonds are broken and the water converts to 100 C steam.
Internal forces between bonds in a molecule can absorb energy independent of the whole molecule. When ultraviolet light transfers energy to an oxygen molecule it causes a vibration across the bond. Eventually it absorbs enough radiated energy (450,000 joules/mole) to break the double bond and the energy is converted into kinetic energy of the individual oxygen atoms. After the atoms radiate energy to the surrounding force fields (in a different wavelength than they absorbed) the atoms can again convert radiated force into an internal force reforming the oxygen molecule.
When considering the conservation of energy the internal energy that cannot be detected must be considered as well as the radiated energy.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-22--How The US Temperature Record Is Being Altered Part 3

How The US Temperature Record Is Being Altered Part 3 This is the last part of a series showing how @ @ @ @ @ being altered by government agencies to turn long term cooling into warming .
Tony Heller @ @ @ @ @ how government ‘ experts ’ have altered the temperature record of the United States to @ @ @ @ @ were one degree cooler in the past and one degree warmer today .
Not only @ @ @ @ @ exaggerated , past temperatures are falsely made to appear cooler than they really were so @ @ @ @ @ two degrees is the true meaning of ‘ man-made global warming.
’ PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL @ @ @ @ @ UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester @ @ @ @ @ .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

How The US Temperature Record Is Being Altered Part 3
Written by Tony Heller
This is the last part of a series showing how the US temperature record is being altered by government agencies to turn long term cooling into warming.
Tony Heller’s latest video shows how government ‘experts’ have altered the temperature record of the United States to make it appear that temperatures were one degree cooler in the past and one degree warmer today. Not only are current temperatures being falsely exaggerated, past temperatures are falsely made to appear cooler than they really were so a fake warming trend of two degrees is the true meaning of ‘man-made global warming.’
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-22--Appeal for Volunteers to Help Expose NHS COVID Test Fraud

Appeal for Volunteers to Help Expose NHS COVID Test Fraud Principia Scientific International is looking for volunteers in the UK to help expose the extent of the apparent NHS fraud over home COVID19 test kits .
We were asked to follow up the matter after receiving a tip about an eye-opening video posted online by Luke Pompey ( see below ) Luke has , like many of us , become increasingly skeptical about the surge in positive tests in recent weeks .
He smelt a rat so ordered an online home test kit from the NHS .
Once the kit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ smartphone the step-by-step sequence of instructions given with the kit .
Except there was one difference .
Instead of swabbing his mouth or nose he carefully placed the unused swab into the sterile plastic receptacle , sealed it and posted it back to the testing center .
In due course , Luke received his test results in the mail and , you guessed it , ‘ positive !
’ Regular readers will recall that earlier this month we reported that Mike Yeadon , a former Chief Science Officer for the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fake.
” Yeadon insisted that : Read more on the damning assessment from the pharmaceutical giant ’ s former top scientist here .
It is clear from the evidence that the government aren ’ t listening to these concerns and are pressing on regardless .
In short , government policy is based on junk science that is causing untold misery – economic , emotional and physical and the longer this travesty continues , the more culpable of criminality are our political masters .
Because we receive so many similar stories to Luke ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to organise a mass experiment and request that anyone in the UK who is willing to emulate Luke ’ s exemplary video also take the test .
Please order your own home COVID19 test kit at https : //www.gov.uk/get-coronavirus-test Below is a screenshot of the free home test page from the UK government website : If you wish to participate , live in the UK and can follow the step-by-step approach Luke used in his video , please order your kit , make a video and send us the results to : john @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 About the author : John O ’ Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder ( with Dr Tim Ball ) of Principia Scientific International ( PSI ) .
John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert , Michael ‘ hockey stick ’ Mann in the ‘ science trial of the century ‘ .
O ’ Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘ Slayers ’ group of scientists in 2010 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Appeal for Volunteers to Help Expose NHS COVID Test Fraud
Written by John O'Sullivan
Principia Scientific International is looking for volunteers in the UK to help expose the extent of the apparent NHS fraud over home COVID19 test kits. We were asked to follow up the matter after receiving a tip about an eye-opening video posted online by Luke Pompey (see below)
Luke has, like many of us, become increasingly skeptical about the surge in positive tests in recent weeks. He smelt a rat so ordered an online home test kit from the NHS.
Once the kit arrived, Luke methodically recorded on his smartphone the step-by-step sequence of instructions given with the kit. Except there was one difference. Instead of swabbing his mouth or nose he carefully placed the unused swab into the sterile plastic receptacle, sealed it and posted it back to the testing center.
In due course, Luke received his test results in the mail and, you guessed it, ‘positive!’
Regular readers will recall that earlier this month we reported that Mike Yeadon, a former Chief Science Officer for the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer called out these PCR tests as “fake.” Yeadon insisted that:
“more than half of the positives are likely to be false, potentially all of them.”
Read more on the damning assessment from the pharmaceutical giant’s former top scientist here.
It is clear from the evidence that the government aren’t listening to these concerns and are pressing on regardless. In short, government policy is based on junk science that is causing untold misery – economic, emotional and physical and the longer this travesty continues, the more culpable of criminality are our political masters.
Because we receive so many similar stories to Luke’s at Principia Scientific, we decided to organise a mass experiment and request that anyone in the UK who is willing to emulate Luke’s exemplary video also take the test.
Please order your own home COVID19 test kit at https://www.gov.uk/get-coronavirus-test
Below is a screenshot of the free home test page from the UK government website:
If you wish to participate, live in the UK and can follow the step-by-step approach Luke used in his video, please order your kit, make a video and send us the results to: [email protected].
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
About the author: John O’Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI). John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-23--‘Lost’ tectonic plate called Resurrection hidden under the Pacific

Scientists have reconstructed a long-lost that may have given rise to an arc of volcanoes in the Pacific Ocean 60 million years ago .
The plate , dubbed Resurrection , has long been controversial among geophysicists , as some believe it never existed .
But the new reconstruction puts the edge of the rocky plate along a line of known ancient , suggesting that it was once part of the crust ( Earth ’ s top layer ) in what is today northern Canada .
“ Volcanoes form at plate boundaries , and the more plates you have , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wu , a geologist at the University of Houston , .
“ Volcanoes also affect .
So , when you are trying to model the Earth and understand how climate has changed … you really want to know how many volcanoes there have been on .
” Wu and his co-author , University of Houston geology doctoral candidate Spencer Fuston , used a computer model of Earth ’ s crust to “ unfold ” the movement of tectonic plates since the early , the geological era that began 66 million years ago .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ plates in the Pacific at that time , the Kula plate and the Farallon plate .
Because lots of is present east of the former location of these plates in what is today Alaska and Washington , some geophysicists argued there was a missing piece in the puzzle — a theoretical plate they called Resurrection .
This magma would have been left behind by volcanic activity at the plate ’ s edge .
All of these plates have long since dived beneath Earth ’ s crust in a process called subduction .
Wu @ @ @ @ @ @ @ undo this subduction , virtually raising the plates back to the surface and rewinding their motion .
When they did , they found that Resurrection did indeed fit into the picture .
They reported their findings Oct. 19 in the journal .
“ When ‘ raised ’ back to the Earth ’ s surface and reconstructed , the boundaries of this ancient Resurrection tectonic plate match well with the ancient volcanic belts in Washington State and Alaska , providing a much sought-after link between the ancient Pacific Ocean and the North American geologic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

‘Lost’ tectonic plate called Resurrection hidden under the Pacific
Written by Stephanie Pappas
Scientists have reconstructed a long-lost tectonic plate that may have given rise to an arc of volcanoes in the Pacific Ocean 60 million years ago.
The plate, dubbed Resurrection, has long been controversial among geophysicists, as some believe it never existed. But the new reconstruction puts the edge of the rocky plate along a line of known ancient volcanoes , suggesting that it was once part of the crust (Earth’s top layer) in what is today northern Canada.
“Volcanoes form at plate boundaries, and the more plates you have, the more volcanoes you have,” Jonny Wu, a geologist at the University of Houston, said in a statement . “Volcanoes also affect climate change . So, when you are trying to model the Earth and understand how climate has changed … you really want to know how many volcanoes there have been on Earth .”
A 3D block diagram across North America showing a mantle tomography image reveals the Slab Unfolding method used to flatten the Farallon tectonic plate. By doing this, Fuston and Wu were able to locate the lost Resurrection plate. (Image credit: University of Houston) This image shows plate tectonic reconstruction of western North America 60 million years ago showing subduction of three key tectonic plates, Kula, Farallon and Resurrection. (Image credit: University of Houston)
Wu and his co-author, University of Houston geology doctoral candidate Spencer Fuston, used a computer model of Earth’s crust to “unfold” the movement of tectonic plates since the early Cenozoic , the geological era that began 66 million years ago. Geophysicists already knew that there were two plates in the Pacific at that time, the Kula plate and the Farallon plate.
Because lots of magma is present east of the former location of these plates in what is today Alaska and Washington, some geophysicists argued there was a missing piece in the puzzle — a theoretical plate they called Resurrection. This magma would have been left behind by volcanic activity at the plate’s edge.
All of these plates have long since dived beneath Earth’s crust in a process called subduction. Wu and Fuston used the computer reconstruction to undo this subduction, virtually raising the plates back to the surface and rewinding their motion . When they did, they found that Resurrection did indeed fit into the picture. They reported their findings Oct. 19 in the journal GSA Bulletin .
“When ‘raised’ back to the Earth’s surface and reconstructed, the boundaries of this ancient Resurrection tectonic plate match well with the ancient volcanic belts in Washington State and Alaska, providing a much sought-after link between the ancient Pacific Ocean and the North American geologic record,” Wu said.
Read more here
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-23--Climate Crisis? Record Harvests For Corn, Wheat & Soybeans!

The largest corn harvest in history is among the reasons the International Grains Council ( IGC ) is forecasting record total grains production in 2020-21 .
According to the IGC ’ s Grain Market Review , released Aug. 27 , total global grains production will reach 2.230 billion tonnes this marketing year , up 50 million tonnes from the July forecast and 9 % higher than the previous year ( 2.181 billion tonnes ) .
A record world wheat crop also is expected at 763 million tonnes , topping the previous mark of 762 million tonnes set last year .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ United States , global soybean production is projected to set a record in 2020-21 at 373 million tonnes , up 8 million tonnes from the July forecast and 9 % higher than last year ’ s total of 339 million tonnes .
Soybean exports are estimated to reach a peak during the recently completed marketing year .
“ Tied to continued heavy shipments from South America , chiefly Brazil , the Council ’ s forecast for global soybean trade in 2019-20 is lifted to a peak of 163 million tonnes , the 7 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dispatches to China , ” the IGC said .
Global rice production is projected to rebound by 2 % year-on-year to a record 505 million tonnes in 2020-21 , on bigger crops among leading exporters .
Total grains consumption is seen climbing by 41 million tonnes over the previous year to 2.222 billion tonnes , led by gains for feed ( 18 million tonnes ) and industrial uses ( 12 million tonnes ) .
“ Amid record supplies , corn demand is seen rising the most , up by 33 million tonnes year @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The forecast for global grains stocks at the end of 2020-21 was revised upward by 5 million tonnes — mainly due to wheat — from the July report to 630 million tonnes .
The IGC Grains and Oilseeds Index increased by 3 % month-on-month to its highest level in nearly two years .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend @ @ @ @

Climate Crisis? Record Harvests For Corn, Wheat & Soybeans!
Written by Arvin Donley
The largest corn harvest in history is among the reasons the International Grains Council (IGC) is forecasting record total grains production in 2020-21.
According to the IGC’s Grain Market Review, released Aug. 27, total global grains production will reach 2.230 billion tonnes this marketing year, up 50 million tonnes from the July forecast and 9% higher than the previous year (2.181 billion tonnes).
A record world wheat crop also is expected at 763 million tonnes, topping the previous mark of 762 million tonnes set last year.
Largely on an upgraded outlook for the United States, global soybean production is projected to set a record in 2020-21 at 373 million tonnes, up 8 million tonnes from the July forecast and 9% higher than last year’s total of 339 million tonnes.
Soybean exports are estimated to reach a peak during the recently completed marketing year.
“Tied to continued heavy shipments from South America, chiefly Brazil, the Council’s forecast for global soybean trade in 2019-20 is lifted to a peak of 163 million tonnes, the 7% year-on-year increase primarily stemming from bigger dispatches to China,” the IGC said.
Global rice production is projected to rebound by 2% year-on-year to a record 505 million tonnes in 2020-21, on bigger crops among leading exporters.
Total grains consumption is seen climbing by 41 million tonnes over the previous year to 2.222 billion tonnes, led by gains for feed (18 million tonnes) and industrial uses (12 million tonnes).
“Amid record supplies, corn demand is seen rising the most, up by 33 million tonnes year on year,” the IGC said.
The forecast for global grains stocks at the end of 2020-21 was revised upward by 5 million tonnes — mainly due to wheat — from the July report to 630 million tonnes.
The IGC Grains and Oilseeds Index increased by 3% month-on-month to its highest level in nearly two years.
Read more at World Grain
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-23--We have only two choices with the virus

We have only two choices with the virus

We have only two choices with the virus Remember when Dr. Fauci was telling us that we were too stupid to do lockdowns right , and that Italy did it the correct way ?
“ When we shut down as a nation , ” he said in July , “ in reality only about 50 % of the nation shut down … In many of the European countries , 90 , 95 % of all activities were shut down .
So that is one of the reasons why [ in Italy ] the cases came down…and then stayed.
” Now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the whole episode .
Oops !
The Daily Beast just wrote : “ What ’ s particularly troubling about the return of COVID in Italy is that the country has done everything experts like Dr. Anthony Fauci have been advising.
” Gee , what a surprise !
Who could have predicted that — except , I guess , everyone who ’ s been paying attention for the past seven months .
In the presidential debate last night , Joe Biden made clear he ’ d listen to Dr. Fauci , which he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Also , Biden warned about teachers dying , even though nowhere in the world have teachers been found to have higher COVID-19 morbidity than people in any other profession .
That was just a fact-free sop to the unions .
He also ridiculed the suggestion that ultimately we ’ d have to learn to live with the virus , as if this was some kind of bizarre , misanthropic proposal as opposed to a brute fact of reality that was clear to a lot of us from the beginning .
As a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ learn to live with the virus ” yielded the following radical right-wing results ( I apologize for having to point out that that term is meant to be satirical , but the 3 % of people on this list who won ’ t get it will write to me in anger ) : “ Covid : Is it time we learned to live with the virus ?
” — BBC News “ We ’ re going to have to learn to live with the virus , says EU health boss ” — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Learn to Live With the Virus ' ” — Bloomberg “ Europe Is Learning to Live With the Coronavirus ” — New York Times “ We can live with that reality and manage the consequences , mainly by making sure our hospitals are prepared ( they are ) .
“ Or we can destroy our society for a virus that most people won ’ t even know they have .
“ Those are our only choices.
” They are indeed .
I actually had a house party for the Tom Woods Show Elite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ drink , laughter , and camaraderie .
For five solid hours , people from around the United States got to live like human beings once again .
It ’ s a great group , and a haven from the anti-life lunatics we ’ re surrounded by every day .
Entry is this way : www .
SupportingListeners.com Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

We have only two choices with the virus
Written by Tom Woods
Remember when Dr. Fauci was telling us that we were too stupid to do lockdowns right, and that Italy did it the correct way?
“When we shut down as a nation,” he said in July, “in reality only about 50% of the nation shut down … In many of the European countries, 90, 95% of all activities were shut down. So that is one of the reasons why [in Italy] the cases came down…and then stayed.”
Now Italy is having its biggest case numbers of the whole episode. Oops!
The Daily Beast just wrote: “What’s particularly troubling about the return of COVID in Italy is that the country has done everything experts like Dr. Anthony Fauci have been advising.”
Gee, what a surprise! Who could have predicted that — except, I guess, everyone who’s been paying attention for the past seven months.
In the presidential debate last night, Joe Biden made clear he’d listen to Dr. Fauci, which he equates with “listening to the science.”
Also, Biden warned about teachers dying, even though nowhere in the world have teachers been found to have higher COVID-19 morbidity than people in any other profession. That was just a fact-free sop to the unions.
He also ridiculed the suggestion that ultimately we’d have to learn to live with the virus, as if this was some kind of bizarre, misanthropic proposal as opposed to a brute fact of reality that was clear to a lot of us from the beginning.
As a matter of fact, a search for “learn to live with the virus” yielded the following radical right-wing results (I apologize for having to point out that that term is meant to be satirical, but the 3% of people on this list who won’t get it will write to me in anger):
“Covid: Is it time we learned to live with the virus?” — BBC News
“We’re going to have to learn to live with the virus, says EU health boss” — euronews
“Covid-19: Virologist Urges ‘Learn to Live With the Virus'” — Bloomberg
“Europe Is Learning to Live With the Coronavirus” — New York Times
Alex Berenson correctly concludes:
“Virus gonna virus.
“We can live with that reality and manage the consequences, mainly by making sure our hospitals are prepared (they are).
“Or we can destroy our society for a virus that most people won’t even know they have.
“Those are our only choices.”
They are indeed.
I actually had a house party for the Tom Woods Show Elite last week. Plenty of food, drink, laughter, and camaraderie. For five solid hours, people from around the United States got to live like human beings once again. It’s a great group, and a haven from the anti-life lunatics we’re surrounded by every day.
Entry is this way: www. SupportingListeners.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-23--New studies show politics, not science, is driving lockdown policies

New studies show politics , not science , is driving lockdown policies According to the non-partisan education news website The 74 , the two factors most closely correlated with school re-openings are the share of the local vote that went to President Donald Trump in 2016 , and the degree to which teachers belong to unions .
Lower support for Trump tends to be correlated with longer school closures , and higher union concentration is also correlated with longer school closures — though correlation is not necessarily causation .
In an article titled “ Politics , Not Science , is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Really Dangerous ’ Degree , Research Suggests , ” The 74 reports : The latest evidence , released this month as a working paper through Brown University ’ s Annenberg Institute for School Reform , indicates that partisanship — as exhibited by the share of voters in a given county who supported Donald Trump in 2016 , as well as the strength of local teachers ’ unions — drove reopening plans “ far more ” than public health conditions .
That conclusion echoes the work of Jon Valant , a senior fellow at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on Education Policy , who shared his own findings in a much-discussed blog post this summer .
Tracking the reopening plans of over 250 districts , Valant detected “ no relationship ” between each locality ’ s decision and its per-capita COVID cases .
Hartney and Finger also highlighted a connection between reopening decisions and organized labor , according to two metrics : the size of a district ( prior research has shown that higher student enrollments are correlated with greater union strength ) and whether it permitted collective bargaining .
Schools planned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of districts where teachers could bargain collectively , the authors found , compared with just 15 percent of districts in which they could not .
Other research supports the idea that union concentration is associated with a greater likelihood of online instruction .
One recent study conducted by Corey DeAngelis , a prominent union critic and director of school choice at the libertarian Reason Foundation , found evidence that school reopening decisions were correlated with four different measures of union strength — but not with COVID risk .
In states with right-to-work laws @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 14 percentage points more likely to reopen in person relative to states without such laws .
Read the full article — with more studies — here .
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

New studies show politics, not science, is driving lockdown policies
Written by Joel B Pollak
According to the non-partisan education news website The 74, the two factors most closely correlated with school re-openings are the share of the local vote that went to President Donald Trump in 2016, and the degree to which teachers belong to unions.
Lower support for Trump tends to be correlated with longer school closures, and higher union concentration is also correlated with longer school closures — though correlation is not necessarily causation.
In an article titled “Politics, Not Science, is Driving School Reopening Decisions to a ‘Really Dangerous’ Degree, Research Suggests,” The 74 reports:
The latest evidence, released this month as a working paper through Brown University’s Annenberg Institute for School Reform, indicates that partisanship — as exhibited by the share of voters in a given county who supported Donald Trump in 2016, as well as the strength of local teachers’ unions — drove reopening plans “far more” than public health conditions. That conclusion echoes the work of Jon Valant, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution’s Brown Center on Education Policy, who shared his own findings in a much-discussed blog post this summer. Tracking the reopening plans of over 250 districts, Valant detected “no relationship” between each locality’s decision and its per-capita COVID cases. … Hartney and Finger also highlighted a connection between reopening decisions and organized labor, according to two metrics: the size of a district (prior research has shown that higher student enrollments are correlated with greater union strength) and whether it permitted collective bargaining. Schools planned for a remote opening in 40 percent of districts where teachers could bargain collectively, the authors found, compared with just 15 percent of districts in which they could not. … Other research supports the idea that union concentration is associated with a greater likelihood of online instruction. One recent study conducted by Corey DeAngelis, a prominent union critic and director of school choice at the libertarian Reason Foundation, found evidence that school reopening decisions were correlated with four different measures of union strength — but not with COVID risk. In states with right-to-work laws, the paper found, schools were 14 percentage points more likely to reopen in person relative to states without such laws.
Read the full article — with more studies — here.
More at www.breitbart.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-23--Censorship of Public Health Science

Censorship of Public Health Science

Since my PhD on the Control of Infectious Diseases in Australia was published in January 2016 my research has been ridiculed , denigrated and censored by the mainstream media .
The Australian government and medical-industry representatives have contributed to this denigration and there has been no public debate of this scientific information .
A democracy requires scientific debate of all the academic literature for public health policy yet in 2020 we are seeing thousands of doctors , scientists and researchers being censored and dismissed on the simple claim by the media or ‘ fact-checkers ’ that the science they are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a small sample of the strategies that have been used to censor my public health research on the control of infectious diseases in Australia .
Please ask yourselves why this science is not being publicly debated ?
I am an academic who has been teaching and researching the vaccination debate from 2004 – 2020 .
My PhD was published in January 2016 on the University of Wollongong website .
I was forced to set up my own website and global newsletter in 2012 to promote my own research because I have been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mainstream media with false and misleading information since 2010 .
In the 10 years that I have attempted to debate this topic in Australia journalists have never presented the scientific arguments that I presented in my PhD that describe how infectious diseases have been controlled for centuries .
Journalists always present my PhD research as “ a conspiracy theory ” and “ anti-vaccination ” and I have never been given a voice in the mainstream media to correct this information .
In this article titled ‘ The Medical Tyranny in Australia ’ I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Australian institutions that has resulted in the censorship of the academic debate on vaccination in Australia .
This has also prevented politicians viewing my research with credibility and consequently it is not used in policy decisions .
In 2004 I enrolled to do my PhD in the School of Public Health ( Faculty of Health ) but the University of Wollongong would not provide supervisors .
They moved my research to the Faculty of Arts ( Social Sciences ) and this was used by the media to remove credibility from my health research @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to politicians .
In the article attached I have described some of the strategies that have been used to suppress the academic debate on the control of infectious diseases in Australia .
For example : • A medical doctor , Dr. John Cunningham , a known leader of an industry-lobby group fabricated allegations of academic misconduct in November 2014 and these allegations were leaked anonymously to the mainstream media and I was defamed with these false allegations .
Whilst the university investigated these allegations in 2015 the Australian government tabled and approved the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ my academic submissions to this inquiry were ignored .
The allegations of misconduct were dismissed and found to be unwarranted in May 2015 and I received an apology from the University ( published on my website ) + financial compensation but the mainstream media would not put out a public statement to correct the public record on my vaccination research or to clear my name from the defamatory allegations .
When I complained to the medical regulatory board ( AHPRA ) about this doctor ’ s behaviour his conduct was supported by AHPRA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Australia in January 2016 and my PhD thesis was published on the University website in January 2016 with a whole week of derogatory articles about my research in the mainstream media with false and misleading information .
• In 2018 when I was involved in a court case on vaccination as an expert witness my affidavit was leaked to the mainstream media at the same time as Peter McIntyre , government vaccine advisor for 23 years , was brought into this case .
My reputation was defamed in this media article with false @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to court .
This is a federal crime and I was advised to report this to the Australian Federal Police ( AFP ) .
I did this in January 2019 but I did not receive a response from the AFP .
• The only official critique of my academic research that had been published in a peer-reviewed journal by January 2019 was authored by the directors of Australia ’ s vaccination program for 23 years – Margaret Burgess and Peter McIntyre .
They have a significant conflict of interest in denigrating my research @ @ @ @ @ @ @ my website that shows the false and misleading information they have used to critique my PhD thesis .
This has resulted in the complete defamation , ridicule and humiliation of myself over the last decade and it has allowed the government to promote lies about vaccines to the public unchallenged .
It also prevents the public from quoting my research as evidence .
Due to my own efforts in publishing my research through my newsletter from 2012 – 2020 my PhD thesis has been downloaded 29,200+ times globally .
On 8 October 2020 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now disabled my account for “ breaching their conditions ” – no explanation provided and now there is no access to any of the 270 newsletters on my website .
At the same time Principia Scientific International published my Newsletter 270 on their website and they have now provided me with a regular blog to publish my newsletters .
When I give talks in Australia on my academic research we have to keep the venue secret until the day of the event so that lobby groups do not target the owners with threats @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2017 , there is government legislation that allows the council ( or an authorised person ) to decide at their discretion “ whether to hire or refuse to hire a venue ” ( Local Government Act 1995 , City of Cockburn Local Laws 2000 , Consolidated Local Law 7.5 Discretion ) .
These experiences demonstrate that academic integrity , freedom of speech and freedom of the press are no longer values that exist in Australia – a country that promotes itself as protecting human rights .
About the author : Dr Judy Wilyman @ @ @ @ @ @ @ International and specialist on vaccine science and has worked professionally as a science teacher for 20 years .
She obtained her PhD from the University of Wollongong ( UOW ) where she also completed a Master of Science degree ( Population Health ) in the Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences in 2007 .
The book based on her PhD research titled “ Australia ’ s Loss of Health Freedom ” is now available to buy .
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Censorship of Public Health Science
Written by Judy Wilyman PhD
Since my PhD on the Control of Infectious Diseases in Australia was published in January 2016 my research has been ridiculed, denigrated and censored by the mainstream media. The Australian government and medical-industry representatives have contributed to this denigration and there has been no public debate of this scientific information.
A democracy requires scientific debate of all the academic literature for public health policy yet in 2020 we are seeing thousands of doctors, scientists and researchers being censored and dismissed on the simple claim by the media or ‘fact-checkers’ that the science they are presenting is ‘misinformation’.
Here is a small sample of the strategies that have been used to censor my public health research on the control of infectious diseases in Australia. Please ask yourselves why this science is not being publicly debated?
Censorship of my Public Health Research:
I am an academic who has been teaching and researching the vaccination debate from 2004 – 2020. My PhD was published in January 2016 on the University of Wollongong website. I was forced to set up my own website and global newsletter in 2012 to promote my own research because I have been defamed, ridiculed and humiliated in the mainstream media with false and misleading information since 2010.
In the 10 years that I have attempted to debate this topic in Australia journalists have never presented the scientific arguments that I presented in my PhD that describe how infectious diseases have been controlled for centuries. Journalists always present my PhD research as “a conspiracy theory” and “anti-vaccination” and I have never been given a voice in the mainstream media to correct this information.
In this article titled ‘The Medical Tyranny in Australia’ I have described some of the corruption in Australian institutions that has resulted in the censorship of the academic debate on vaccination in Australia. This has also prevented politicians viewing my research with credibility and consequently it is not used in policy decisions.
In 2004 I enrolled to do my PhD in the School of Public Health (Faculty of Health) but the University of Wollongong would not provide supervisors. They moved my research to the Faculty of Arts (Social Sciences) and this was used by the media to remove credibility from my health research when describing it to the public and to politicians.
In the article attached I have described some of the strategies that have been used to suppress the academic debate on the control of infectious diseases in Australia. For example:
A medical doctor, Dr. John Cunningham, a known leader of an industry-lobby group fabricated allegations of academic misconduct in November 2014 and these allegations were leaked anonymously to the mainstream media and I was defamed with these false allegations.
Whilst the university investigated these allegations in 2015 the Australian government tabled and approved the No Jab No Pay policy – hence my academic submissions to this inquiry were ignored. The allegations of misconduct were dismissed and found to be unwarranted in May 2015 and I received an apology from the University (published on my website) + financial compensation but the mainstream media would not put out a public statement to correct the public record on my vaccination research or to clear my name from the defamatory allegations.
When I complained to the medical regulatory board (AHPRA) about this doctor’s behaviour his conduct was supported by AHPRA.
Coercive vaccination was implemented in Australia in January 2016 and my PhD thesis was published on the University website in January 2016 with a whole week of derogatory articles about my research in the mainstream media with false and misleading information. In 2018 when I was involved in a court case on vaccination as an expert witness my affidavit was leaked to the mainstream media at the same time as Peter McIntyre, government vaccine advisor for 23 years, was brought into this case. My reputation was defamed in this media article with false information and the case did not go to court. This is a federal crime and I was advised to report this to the Australian Federal Police (AFP). I did this in January 2019 but I did not receive a response from the AFP. The only official critique of my academic research that had been published in a peer-reviewed journal by January 2019 was authored by the directors of Australia’s vaccination program for 23 years – Margaret Burgess and Peter McIntyre. They have a significant conflict of interest in denigrating my research and I have provided a response on my website that shows the false and misleading information they have used to critique my PhD thesis.
This has resulted in the complete defamation, ridicule and humiliation of myself over the last decade and it has allowed the government to promote lies about vaccines to the public unchallenged. It also prevents the public from quoting my research as evidence.
Due to my own efforts in publishing my research through my newsletter from 2012 – 2020 my PhD thesis has been downloaded 29,200+ times globally. On 8 October 2020 I sent Newsletter 270 and Mailchimp has now disabled my account for “breaching their conditions” – no explanation provided and now there is no access to any of the 270 newsletters on my website.
At the same time Principia Scientific International published my Newsletter 270 on their website and they have now provided me with a regular blog to publish my newsletters.
When I give talks in Australia on my academic research we have to keep the venue secret until the day of the event so that lobby groups do not target the owners with threats to their reputation and now, since 2017, there is government legislation that allows the council (or an authorised person) to decide at their discretion “whether to hire or refuse to hire a venue” (Local Government Act 1995, City of Cockburn Local Laws 2000, Consolidated Local Law 7.5 Discretion).
These experiences demonstrate that academic integrity, freedom of speech and freedom of the press are no longer values that exist in Australia – a country that promotes itself as protecting human rights.
Read more at www.vaccinationdecisions.net
About the author: Dr Judy Wilyman is a Senior Fellow at Principia Scientific International and specialist on vaccine science and has worked professionally as a science teacher for 20 years. She obtained her PhD from the University of Wollongong (UOW) where she also completed a Master of Science degree (Population Health) in the Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences in 2007. The book based on her PhD research titled “Australia’s Loss of Health Freedom” is now available to buy.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related