principiascientificinternational--2020-10-27--Book Review: ‘Corona, False Alarm? Facts and Figures’

Regular contributor , Dr Roger Higgs has a review of an important new book to share with Principia Scientific International readers .
Corona , False Alarm ?
: Facts and Figures is currently the # 1 best seller on Amazon ’ s Biostatistics section and already has 144 five star ratings and offers astonishing facts and figures behind the fake pandemic that everyone needs to see .
As Dr Higgs writes in his review of the book for Amazon : “ This magnificent inexpensive little book ( just 136 pages ) has taken Germany by storm and will astonish you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and a biochemist/biologist , who happen to be married .
The book is scientifically rigorous , with 246 references ( ! )
, but easily understood by non-specialists .
You will be appalled and , hopefully , livid at the way governments and the media have misinformed you .
In my own field ( geology ) , the same degree of wicked deception applies to ‘ man-made ’ global warming .
In reality , the ongoing slight warming ( soon to revert to cooling ) is perfectly natural , Sun-driven , highly beneficial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do with CO2 .
In both cases there ’ s very clearly a population-control agenda in play , perpetrated by the same people , the controllers of the UN ( including ‘ deadly covid ’ WHO and ‘ climate crisis ’ IPCC ) , WEF , EU , MSM , Facebook , etc .
Dr Roger Higgs , DPhil ( geology , Oxford , 1982-86 ) , Consultant Geologist .
In a congratulatory email to the book ’ s authors , Dr Higgs continues : “ Cut to the facts about coronavirus in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ runaway German bestseller .
In June 2020 , Corona , False Alarm ?
exploded into the German market , selling 200,000 copies and 75,000 e-books in six weeks .
No other topic dominates our attention as much as coronavirus and COVID-19 , the infectious disease it triggers .
There ’ s been a global deluge of contradictory opinions , fake news , and politically controlled information .
Differing views on the dangers posed by the pandemic have led to deep division and confusion , within governments , society , and even among friends @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Alarm ?
, award-winning researchers Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi and Dr. Karina Reiss give clarity to these confusing and stressful times .
They offer analysis of whether radical protective measures-including lockdown , social distancing , and mandatory masking-have been justified , and what the ramifications have been for society , the economy , and public health .
Dr. Bhakdi and Dr. Reiss provide dates , facts , and background information , including : How Covid-19 compares with previous coronaviruses and the flu virus What infection numbers and the death rate really tell us The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ measures justified ?
Mandatory mask-wearing : Does the science support it ?
Does the race for vaccine development make sense ?
What are the chances of success ?
Will the vaccine be safe ?
Will people accept it ?
Corona , False Alarm ?
provides you with sound information and substantiated facts-and encourages you to form your own opinion on the corona crisis.
” Corona , False Alarm ?
: Facts and Figures is available to buy now on Amazon .
About Dr Roger Higgs : Roger holds a Doctor of Philosophy ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ heads Geoclastica Ltd .
He has spent the last 5 years researching on ALL scientific aspects of Earth ’ s endless climate change , including geology ( his own field ) , astrophysics , oceanography & palaeoclimatology and is an avowed denier of the man-made global warming narrative .
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please @ @ @ @ @ @ @ To Defend The Scientific Method .

Book Review: ‘Corona, False Alarm? Facts and Figures’
Written by Dr Roger HIGGS DPhil geology, Oxford
Regular contributor, Dr Roger Higgs has a review of an important new book to share with Principia Scientific International readers. Corona, False Alarm?: Facts and Figures is currently the #1 best seller on Amazon’s Biostatistics section and already has 144 five star ratings and offers astonishing facts and figures behind the fake pandemic that everyone needs to see.
As Dr Higgs writes in his review of the book for Amazon:
“This magnificent inexpensive little book (just 136 pages) has taken Germany by storm and will astonish you. The authors are an eminent epidemiologist and a biochemist/biologist, who happen to be married. The book is scientifically rigorous, with 246 references(!), but easily understood by non-specialists. You will be appalled and, hopefully, livid at the way governments and the media have misinformed you. In my own field (geology), the same degree of wicked deception applies to ‘man-made’ global warming. In reality, the ongoing slight warming (soon to revert to cooling) is perfectly natural, Sun-driven, highly beneficial to society, and nothing whatsoever to do with CO2. In both cases there’s very clearly a population-control agenda in play, perpetrated by the same people, the controllers of the UN (including ‘deadly covid’ WHO and ‘climate crisis’ IPCC), WEF, EU, MSM, Facebook, etc. Dr Roger Higgs, DPhil (geology, Oxford, 1982-86), Consultant Geologist.
In a congratulatory email to the book’s authors, Dr Higgs continues:
The same degree of deception that you have exposed in the case of covid applies equally to ‘anthropogenic’ global warming (AGW), which the vast majority of geologists knows, or at least feels, is untrue. It is no coincidence that the perpetrators, the IPCC, are another agency of the United Nations, like the WHO. Sadly, most geologists, and doubtless most virologists, are too afraid for their careers to speak out; but there comes a time to put principles above career. For your interest, here are two very brief (3 minutes each) items denouncing AGW which I posted online a few months ago: It is no coincidence that the perpetrators, the IPCC, are another agency of the United Nations, like the WHO. Sadly, most geologists, and doubtless most virologists, are too afraid for their careers to speak out; but there comes a time to put principles above career. For your interest, here are two very brief (3 minutes each) items denouncing AGW which I posted online a few months ago: here and here .”
Amazon describes the book thus:
“Cut to the facts about coronavirus in Corona, False Alarm?, the runaway German bestseller. In June 2020, Corona, False Alarm? exploded into the German market, selling 200,000 copies and 75,000 e-books in six weeks. No other topic dominates our attention as much as coronavirus and COVID-19, the infectious disease it triggers. There’s been a global deluge of contradictory opinions, fake news, and politically controlled information. Differing views on the dangers posed by the pandemic have led to deep division and confusion, within governments, society, and even among friends and family. In Corona, False Alarm?, award-winning researchers Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi and Dr. Karina Reiss give clarity to these confusing and stressful times. They offer analysis of whether radical protective measures-including lockdown, social distancing, and mandatory masking-have been justified, and what the ramifications have been for society, the economy, and public health. Dr. Bhakdi and Dr. Reiss provide dates, facts, and background information, including: How Covid-19 compares with previous coronaviruses and the flu virus What infection numbers and the death rate really tell us The challenges around lockdown: Were the protective measures justified? Mandatory mask-wearing: Does the science support it? Does the race for vaccine development make sense? What are the chances of success? Will the vaccine be safe? Will people accept it? Corona, False Alarm? provides you with sound information and substantiated facts-and encourages you to form your own opinion on the corona crisis.”
Corona, False Alarm?: Facts and Figures is available to buy now on Amazon.
About Dr Roger Higgs: Roger holds a Doctor of Philosophy (geology, Oxford, 1982-86) and heads Geoclastica Ltd. He has spent the last 5 years researching on ALL scientific aspects of Earth’s endless climate change, including geology (his own field), astrophysics, oceanography & palaeoclimatology and is an avowed denier of the man-made global warming narrative.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-28--Covid Case Study: How Wales Is Being Screwed by Corrupt Government

Covid Case Study : How Wales Is Being Screwed by Corrupt Government There are lies , damn lies and statistics .
We know the old saying .
But , thanks to the pandemic , never have we seen so many lies told by corrupt politicians to cause so much needless suffering .
Below we run a case study of the tiny UK nation of Wales .
A country that has experienced two total ‘ lockdowns ’ already imposed by uncaring and out of touch policymakers .
As we can see from today ’ s headline from the BBC , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ propaganda war to lie and cheat the public on the truth .
As the BBC story tells us : Wales will have been shut down needlessly for 17 days and we can reveal that the reported ‘ extra ’ death of 37 people , above , is a damned lying statistic .
The shocking truth is that Wales is currently experiencing the lowest death rate since official death toll records were first collected among 24 European nations .
as recorded and shown for public inspection , at www.euromomo.eu Using only the official data @ @ @ @ @ @ @ criticize , readers can see for themselves how there is no basis for the imposition of the wholesale closure of what are euphemistically termed ‘ non essential businesses , ’ those shops , gyms , restaurants , pubs , clubs , even religious centers .
According to official data provided , we can see that despite politicians and the media bleating about the ‘ deadly ’ virus , the actual number of people currently dying is the LOWEST EVER RECORDED !
See red arrow in graph below : Two more key statistics further @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wales .
They are as follows : • The latest data from the Office for National Statistics ( ONS ) show that the current population of Wales is 3,152,900 ( see : https : //www.visitnorthwest.com/essential/population-wales/ ) • The total number of deaths in Wales attributed to COVID19 by Public Health Wales ( PHW ) since the start of the pandemic is 1,827 .
( see : https : //public.tableau.com/profile/public.health.wales.health.protection # !
/vizhome/RapidCOVID-19virology-Public/Headlinesummary ) Anyone can calculate from these numbers the overall death rate due to this ‘ deadly ’ new virus , we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ = 0.0579 percent .
As such , the vast majority of people living in Wales may not know anyone who has officially died from COVID19 .
Not much comfort when you ’ ve already lost your job , social life and are suffering from endless cabin fever , increased risk of obesity , lack of vitamin D and all the other ailments any policy of tyrannical house arrest brings with it .
According to the latest CIA estimates , the crude death rate globally will normally be 7.7 deaths per 1,000 persons in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CIA Staff ( 2020 ) .
“ People and Society ” .
CIA World Factbook .
Retrieved October 28,2020 . )
Thus , we may expect to see in Wales , over the course of any normal year , that 24.278 people will have died of all causes .
This is not to minimize the loss of those 1,827 .
According to the number from the U.S. Centers for Disease and Control and Prevention ( CDC ) the survival rate from COVID19 is between 99.5 percent and 99.997 percent for anyone 69 and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , it is 94.6 percent .
But we also know that 96 percent of deaths were among those over 80 and that is more of less actual average life expectancy ( The current life expectancy for U.K. in 2020 is 81.40 years , a 0.15 % increase from 2019 ) The way 2020 is headed for Wales , it is a reasonable bet that the country will end the year with one of the lowest total death rates in modern times .
But what will 2021 bring ?
As the headline from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there is a hidden health crisis brewing just beneath the surface BECAUSE of these stupid lockdowns and is being criminally ignored by politicians who are only interested in COVID ‘ cases ’ .
The current political class are united , whether on the left or the right in this insanity .
They ignore all attempts by concerned doctors and scientists to urgently review an obsession with a pandemic that is proving , in Wales at least , to now be having NO MEASURABLE impact on overall mortality whatsoever .
Along with our friends @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our growing army of scientists and science , medical professionals , are backing legal action against the corrupt governments and are making regular representations to elected officials .
We will not cease in our efforts to end this madness and we thank all readers for donating to help our mission .
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 About the author : John O ’ Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder ( with Dr Tim Ball ) of Principia Scientific International ( PSI ) .
John @ @ @ @ @ @ @ analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert , Michael ‘ hockey stick ’ Mann in the ‘ science trial of the century ‘ .
O ’ Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘ Slayers ’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world ’ s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Covid Case Study: How Wales Is Being Screwed by Corrupt Government
Written by John O'Sullivan
There are lies, damn lies and statistics. We know the old saying. But, thanks to the pandemic, never have we seen so many lies told by corrupt politicians to cause so much needless suffering. Below we run a case study of the tiny UK nation of Wales. A country that has experienced two total ‘lockdowns’ already imposed by uncaring and out of touch policymakers.
As we can see from today’s headline from the BBC, the mainstream media is all in on the propaganda war to lie and cheat the public on the truth. As the BBC story tells us:
“A further 37 people have died with coronavirus, a Welsh Government briefing has been told. Announcing Public Health Wales (PHW) daily figures, Counsel General Jeremy Miles said the sharp increase was down to a “time lag” and showed Wales’ current 17-day firebreak lockdown was “absolutely essential”. It means a total of 1,827 have died in Wales since the start of the pandemic. A further 1,414 people have tested positive, PHW’s data has shown. Mr Miles confirmed the current Wales-wide lockdown will end on 9 November and businesses will be allowed to reopen.”
Wales will have been shut down needlessly for 17 days and we can reveal that the reported ‘extra’ death of 37 people, above, is a damned lying statistic.
The shocking truth is that Wales is currently experiencing the lowest death rate since official death toll records were first collected among 24 European nations. as recorded and shown for public inspection, at www.euromomo.eu
Using only the official data provided by the very same governments we criticize, readers can see for themselves how there is no basis for the imposition of the wholesale closure of what are euphemistically termed ‘non essential businesses,’ those shops, gyms, restaurants, pubs, clubs, even religious centers.
According to official data provided, we can see that despite politicians and the media bleating about the ‘deadly’ virus, the actual number of people currently dying is the LOWEST EVER RECORDED! See red arrow in graph below:
Two more key statistics further undermine the credibility of the lockdown in Wales. They are as follows:
The latest data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show that the current population of Wales is 3,152,900 (see: https://www.visitnorthwest.com/essential/population-wales/ )
The total number of deaths in Wales attributed to COVID19 by Public Health Wales (PHW) since the start of the pandemic is 1,827. (see: https://public.tableau.com/profile/public.health.wales.health.protection#!/vizhome/RapidCOVID-19virology-Public/Headlinesummary )
Anyone can calculate from these numbers the overall death rate due to this ‘deadly’ new virus, we see 1,827 as a percentage of 3,152,900 = 0.0579 percent.
As such, the vast majority of people living in Wales may not know anyone who has officially died from COVID19. Not much comfort when you’ve already lost your job, social life and are suffering from endless cabin fever, increased risk of obesity, lack of vitamin D and all the other ailments any policy of tyrannical house arrest brings with it.
According to the latest CIA estimates, the crude death rate globally will normally be 7.7 deaths per 1,000 persons in a population per year (see: CIA Staff (2020). “People and Society”. CIA World Factbook. Retrieved October 28,2020.)
Thus, we may expect to see in Wales, over the course of any normal year, that 24.278 people will have died of all causes. This is not to minimize the loss of those 1,827.
According to the number from the U.S. Centers for Disease and Control and Prevention (CDC) the survival rate from COVID19 is between 99.5 percent and 99.997 percent for anyone 69 and under, while for 70 or older, it is 94.6 percent.
But we also know that 96 percent of deaths were among those over 80 and that is more of less actual average life expectancy (The current life expectancy for U.K. in 2020 is 81.40 years, a 0.15% increase from 2019)
The way 2020 is headed for Wales, it is a reasonable bet that the country will end the year with one of the lowest total death rates in modern times.
But what will 2021 bring?
As the headline from the Daily Telegraph (above) reveals, there is a hidden health crisis brewing just beneath the surface BECAUSE of these stupid lockdowns and is being criminally ignored by politicians who are only interested in COVID ‘cases’ .
The current political class are united, whether on the left or the right in this insanity. They ignore all attempts by concerned doctors and scientists to urgently review an obsession with a pandemic that is proving, in Wales at least, to now be having NO MEASURABLE impact on overall mortality whatsoever.
Along with our friends and supporters, Principia Scientific International and our growing army of scientists and science, medical professionals, are backing legal action against the corrupt governments and are making regular representations to elected officials. We will not cease in our efforts to end this madness and we thank all readers for donating to help our mission.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
About the author: John O’Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI). John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-28--WA Citizens Speak up against Unscientific COVID19 Measures

Australia ’ s response to a new coronavirus in 2020 was clearly unscientific because it was not based on REAL data .
( Remember the virus was not in the country when Mr. Morrison applied for emergency pandemic powers on 21 January 2020 ) .
You can not determine how a virus will respond in any country until you observe that specific virus in that country – under the specific environmental and host conditions of that country .
The virulence of the virus will vary from country to country and this is why you can not predict a pandemic based @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this has never been done before in history .
Therefore , the claim by the Australian Prime Minister , Scott Morrison , that he was locking down the country as a “ precautionary measure ’ was fraudulent and unscientific .
Further , fraudulently collected and manipulated statistics were used to justify this claim .
Never in history have we locked down healthy people to control an infectious disease and this is the real reason why the Australian government has gone to such lengths to censor my research and why the mainstream media is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Dr. Judy Wilyman ’ s Speech from the Protest Rally at WA Parliament House on 5 September 2020 .
This speech was given to ~2000+ people but there was no coverage of this speech in the mainstream media even though ( as you can see ) channel 7 is present .
Here are the videos of the speeches given by concerned WA citizens outside Parliament House regarding the government ’ s extreme response to a new mutated Coronavirus 2019 .
Judy Wilyman PhD describes the corruption of research science and the political @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Australian borders need to be opened immediately .
Stephen Wells describes the false health information being used to control the public .
Mark Imisides PhD describes the false COVID19 statistics that the Australian government is using to bring in a new vaccine with coercive measures that remove human rights .
About the author : Dr Judy Wilyman is a Senior Fellow at Principia Scientific International and specialist on vaccine science and has worked professionally as a science teacher for 20 years .
She obtained her PhD from the University of Wollongong ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Master of Science degree ( Population Health ) in the Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences in 2007 .
The book based on her PhD research titled “ Australia ’ s Loss of Health Freedom ” is now available to buy .
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission @ @ @ @ @ @

WA Citizens Speak up against Unscientific COVID19 Measures
Written by Dr Judy Wilyman PhD
Australia’s response to a new coronavirus in 2020 was clearly unscientific because it was not based on REAL data. (Remember the virus was not in the country when Mr. Morrison applied for emergency pandemic powers on 21 January 2020).
You cannot determine how a virus will respond in any country until you observe that specific virus in that country – under the specific environmental and host conditions of that country. The virulence of the virus will vary from country to country and this is why you cannot predict a pandemic based on a generic mathematical formula – and this has never been done before in history.
Therefore, the claim by the Australian Prime Minister, Scott Morrison, that he was locking down the country as a “precautionary measure’ was fraudulent and unscientific.
Further, fraudulently collected and manipulated statistics were used to justify this claim.
Never in history have we locked down healthy people to control an infectious disease and this is the real reason why the Australian government has gone to such lengths to censor my research and why the mainstream media is only providing you with big pharma science.
Dr. Judy Wilyman’s Speech from the Protest Rally at WA Parliament House on 5 September 2020. This speech was given to ~2000+ people but there was no coverage of this speech in the mainstream media even though (as you can see) channel 7 is present.
Speeches at WA Parliament House on Saturday October 24th
Here are the videos of the speeches given by concerned WA citizens outside Parliament House regarding the government’s extreme response to a new mutated Coronavirus 2019.
Michael Darby speaks to the WA Police Force
Judy Wilyman PhD describes the corruption of research science and the political processes. It also describes why all the Australian borders need to be opened immediately.
Stephen Wells describes the false health information being used to control the public.
Mark Imisides PhD describes the false COVID19 statistics that the Australian government is using to bring in a new vaccine with coercive measures that remove human rights.
Read more at www.vaccinationdecisions.net
About the author: Dr Judy Wilyman is a Senior Fellow at Principia Scientific International and specialist on vaccine science and has worked professionally as a science teacher for 20 years. She obtained her PhD from the University of Wollongong (UOW) where she also completed a Master of Science degree (Population Health) in the Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences in 2007. The book based on her PhD research titled “Australia’s Loss of Health Freedom” is now available to buy.
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-28--The Much Misunderstood Climate Issue of CO2 Infrared Absorption

The Much Misunderstood Climate Issue of CO2 Infrared Absorption Professor W.J.Witteman [ Ref .
1 ] provides a detailed account of the absorption of thermal emission from the Earth surface by atmospheric CO .
He found that at atmospheric temperatures only a few low-lying vibrational bands of CO are relevant .
Further , it stated that “ Especially the absorbed radiation power by the ground state bending mode at about 15 microns is dominant.
” The Conclusion states “ The absorption of thermal emission from the earth by CO occurs at wavelengths around 15 , 5 and 4.3 microns.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CO was calculated using the HITRAN web site facility [ Ref.2 ] for the parameters of temperature of 12̊C and pressure 0.945 atmospheres being the estimated average conditions at about 500 metres above sea level .
The result is shown in Figure 1 .
The section between wavenumbers 400 to 2600 cm-1 is that referred to in Witteman [ Ref.1 ] as the region of absorption of the thermal emission from the earth .
The calculated HITRAN spectrum listing gave the major peaks as : From inspection of the HITRAN listing , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thousandth of the peak line intensity as their outer limits .
This gave the absorption band limits to be : Applying these values to the Planck function for an average Earth temperature of 15̊C ( 288̊K ) gave the following energy values for the respective absorption bands : for a total photon density of 6.929 x 10+13 photons per cu .
m. of which the 15 micron band dominates with 99.83 % of the total .
Thus the only absorption and re-emission by atmospheric CO of any consequence must be the photons in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ temperatures that radiate at the CO absorption peaks are : Since 99.83 % of the photons that may be absorbed by the atmospheric CO molecules will be from the 15 micron absorption band and these represent radiation from a source at 193.5̊K , they will not heat the Earth at its average surface temperature of 288̊K .
Only radiation of a wavelength less that 10.06 microns , the peak of radiation from a source at 288̊K , will cause heating of the Earth – Second Law of Thermodynamics .
The probability of an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the three shorter wavelength , ‘ hot ’ , bands is insignificant .
Temperatures of less than 193.5̊K , ie .
-79.5̊C , occur occasionally in Antarctica and the surface there is too cold to produce any significant radiation in the three shorter wavelength absorption bands .
Applying the same absorption bands to the Planck function for the Sun ’ s radiation at 5772̊K adjusted by a divisor of 46,238.8 to provide for the decrease in intensity by the square of the distance apart , gave the following energy values for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s average distance from the Sun : a. energy density 3.0256 x 10-9 Joules per cubic metre , being 1.661 x 10-4 of the total emission and a photon density of 2.2812 x 10+11 photons per cubic metre , b. energy density 1.789 x 10-8 J/cu.m.
, being 9.8506 x 10-4 of the total emission and a photon density of 3.8137 x 10+11 photons per cu .
m. , c. energy density 7.5175 x 10-8 J/cu.m.
, being 4.139 x 10-3 of the total emission and a photon density of 1.0154 x 10+12 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ energy density 5.53 x 10-8 J/cu.m.
, being 3.046 x 10-3 of the total emission and a photon density of 5.5789 x 10+11 photons per cu .
m. All three of the shorter wavelength , ‘ hot ’ , absorption bands have greater energy density emanating from the Sun than that from the Earth .
The greenhouse effect would apply equally well to this incoming radiation and should have caused the Earth to cool as the concentration of atmospheric CO increased due to an increase in the amount of radiation back into space @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In the abstract , Witteman [ Ref.1 ] , it states : Further on in the text , it states : The total photon density from the four emission bands is shown above to be of 6.929 x 10+7 photons per cm3 , that is , one photon for every 158,750,000 CO molecules .
The effect of the absorption and re-emission of the Earth ’ s radiation at this rate of photons must be completely insignificant as is the current rate of increase in CO of 3.4 ppm per annum .
The Executive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ UN IPCC report “ Climate Change – The IPCC Scientific Assessment ” 1990 , stated : • some gases are potentially more effective than others at changing climate , and their relative effectiveness can be estimated Carbon dioxide has been responsible for over half the enhanced greenhouse effect in the past , and is likely to remain so in the future.
” Then in the Policymaker ’ s Summary , page xiii , it stated : Later reports have continued on this theme with an emphasis on the dire consequences that will arise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ change .
This analysis has shown that the greenhouse effect arising from the dominant long wavelength CO absorption band emanating from the Earth ’ s surface at 288̊K can not cause warming of the atmosphere or the surface , but perhaps cooling .
Radiation back into space from the shorter wavelength CO absorption bands , emitted from the Sun , should have caused the Earth ’ s temperature to decrease as the CO concentration increased .
Within the limits of measurement , neither of these events have taken place thereby negating the UN @ @ @ @ @ @ @ warming or climate change .
The factor of the order of 108 between the CO molecular density in the atmosphere relative to the photon emission from the Earth ’ s surface shows why there is no measurable effect .
This supports the findings from the analysis of climate data from stations across the globe that have shown that the atmospheric temperature is independent of the CO concentration but correlates with the annual rate of change of CO concentration due to climate change driving the change in CO .
On 22 October 2020 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Loa Observatory was 412.05 ppm .
That equates to a density of 1.145 x 10+16 molecules of CO per cubic centimetre .
The four main absorption bands for CO emit 6.929 x 10+7 photons per cm3 , that is , one photon for every 165,300,000 CO molecules from Planck ’ s law for a source temperature of 15̊C .
Consequently all of the radiation from the four bands emitted from the Earth ’ s surface for an average temperature of 15̊C would have been absorbed within a few hundred metres of the surface @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CO molecules in their vibrational ground state .
Increasing or decreasing the atmospheric CO concentration by a few hundred ppm would make no difference to this outcome other than decreasing or increasing the altitude at which complete absorption takes place .
This supports earlier results from the analysis of data at a number of CO stations across the globe that satellite lower troposphere temperature was independent of the CO concentration .
It also negates the current reason to stop the use of fossil fuel and shows that the CO climate sensitivity metric used @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which is one reason why the model predictions are always wrong .
Furthermore the main absorption peak for CO is at a wavelength of 14.97 microns , the peak for radiation from a source at -79.5̊C .
That would likely cause cooling of the atmosphere , not warming except for the fact that the amount of energy involved is infinitesimal when spread through the Earth ’ s troposphere .
The UN IPCC , the Greens and the Socialist Left have caused unnecessary pain , anguish and expense with their unjustified claim that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the increase in the Earth ’ s atmospheric temperature over the past century as the Earth recovered from the Little Ice Age .
• W.J.Witteman , The absorption of thermal emitted infrared radiation by CO .
About the author : Bevan Dockery , B.Sc .
( Hons ) , Grad .
Dip .
Computing , retired geophysicist , formerly : Fellow of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists , Member of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists , Member of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists , Member of the European Association of Exploration @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Mining and Metallurgy .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

The Much Misunderstood Climate Issue of CO2 Infrared Absorption
Written by Bevan Dockery
Professor W.J.Witteman [Ref. 1] provides a detailed account of the absorption of thermal emission from the Earth surface by atmospheric CO 2 . He found that at atmospheric temperatures only a few low-lying vibrational bands of CO 2 are relevant. Further, it stated that “Especially the absorbed radiation power by the ground state bending mode at about 15 microns is dominant.”
The Conclusion states “The absorption of thermal emission from the earth by CO 2 occurs at wavelengths around 15, 5 and 4.3 microns.”
HITRAN CO 2 absorption spectrum
For this study, a spectrum for CO 2 was calculated using the HITRAN web site facility [Ref.2] for the parameters of temperature of 12̊C and pressure 0.945 atmospheres being the estimated average conditions at about 500 metres above sea level. The result is shown in Figure 1. The section between wavenumbers 400 to 2600 cm-1 is that referred to in Witteman [Ref.1] as the region of absorption of the thermal emission from the earth.
Figure 1.
The calculated HITRAN spectrum listing gave the major peaks as:
a. wavenumber 667.661 cm-1 , that is, wavelength 14.9777 microns, frequency 20.016 Tera Hz, amplitude 3.061 x 10-19 cm/mol, b. wavenumber 2361.47 cm-1 ,that is, wavelength 4.2347 microns, frequency 70.795 Tera Hz, amplitude 3.642 x 10-18 cm/mol, c. wavenumber 3727.08 cm-1 ,that is, wavelength 2.6831 microns, frequency 111.74 Tera Hz, amplitude 6.092 x 10-20 cm/mol, d. wavenumber 4989.97 cm-1 ,that is, wavelength 2.0040 microns, frequency 149.6 Tera Hz, amplitude 1.356 x 10-21 cm/mol.
From inspection of the HITRAN listing, the absorption bands were chosen by taking one thousandth of the peak line intensity as their outer limits. This gave the absorption band limits to be:
a. 13.26 to 17.07 microns, b. 4.189 to 4.377 microns, c. 2.663 to 2.823 microns, and d. 1.995 to 2.036 microns.
Earth’s thermal radiation
Applying these values to the Planck function for an average Earth temperature of 15̊C (288̊K) gave the following energy values for the respective absorption bands:
a. energy density 9.174 x 10-7 Joules per cubic metre, being 0.176 of the total emission and a photon density of 6.917 x 10+13 photons per cubic metre, b. energy density 5.618 x 10-9 J/cu.m., being 0.00108 of the total emission and a photon density of 1.198 x 10+11 photons per cu. m., c. energy density 6.447 x 10-11 J/cu.m., being 1.24 x 10-5 of the total emission and a photon density of 8.708 x 10+8 photons per cu. m., d. energy density 1.081 x 10-13 J/cu.m., being 2.077 x 10-8 of the total emission and a photon density of 1.091 x 10+6 photons per cu. m.,
for a total photon density of 6.929 x 10+13 photons per cu. m. of which the 15 micron band dominates with 99.83% of the total.
Thus the only absorption and re-emission by atmospheric CO 2 of any consequence must be the photons in the 15 micron band.
The source temperatures that radiate at the CO 2 absorption peaks are:
a. 193.5̊K, ie. -79.5̊C, b. 685̊K, ie. 412̊C, c. 1080̊K, ie. 807̊C, and d. 1446̊K, ie. 1173̊C.
Since 99.83% of the photons that may be absorbed by the atmospheric CO 2 molecules will be from the 15 micron absorption band and these represent radiation from a source at 193.5̊K, they will not heat the Earth at its average surface temperature of 288̊K. Only radiation of a wavelength less that 10.06 microns, the peak of radiation from a source at 288̊K, will cause heating of the Earth – Second Law of Thermodynamics. The probability of an atmospheric CO 2 molecule absorbing radiation in one of the three shorter wavelength, ‘hot’, bands is insignificant.
Temperatures of less than 193.5̊K, ie. -79.5̊C, occur occasionally in Antarctica and the surface there is too cold to produce any significant radiation in the three shorter wavelength absorption bands.
Sun’s radiation
Applying the same absorption bands to the Planck function for the Sun’s radiation at 5772̊K adjusted by a divisor of 46,238.8 to provide for the decrease in intensity by the square of the distance apart, gave the following energy values for the respective absorption bands at the Earth’s average distance from the Sun:
a. energy density 3.0256 x 10-9 Joules per cubic metre, being 1.661 x 10-4 of the total emission and a photon density of 2.2812 x 10+11 photons per cubic metre, b. energy density 1.789 x 10-8 J/cu.m., being 9.8506 x 10-4 of the total emission and a photon density of 3.8137 x 10+11 photons per cu. m., c. energy density 7.5175 x 10-8 J/cu.m., being 4.139 x 10-3 of the total emission and a photon density of 1.0154 x 10+12 photons per cu. m., d. energy density 5.53 x 10-8 J/cu.m., being 3.046 x 10-3 of the total emission and a photon density of 5.5789 x 10+11 photons per cu. m.
All three of the shorter wavelength, ‘hot’, absorption bands have greater energy density emanating from the Sun than that from the Earth. The greenhouse effect would apply equally well to this incoming radiation and should have caused the Earth to cool as the concentration of atmospheric CO 2 increased due to an increase in the amount of radiation back into space before it could warm the Earth.
Molecular density:
In the abstract, Witteman [Ref.1], it states:
“Roughly, only 10% of its spectrum is active and the thermal radiation that falls within these regions is fully absorbed. This is not only the case for 400 ppm of CO 2 in the atmosphere but also for much smaller concentration values.”
Further on in the text, it states:
“The air density is about 2.78 x 1019 molecules per cm3. The present content of CO 2 is 400 ppm or 0.04% so that N CO2 = 1.1 x 1016 cm3. At atmospheric temperatures practically all molecules are in the vibrational ground state.”
The total photon density from the four emission bands is shown above to be of 6.929 x 10+7 photons per cm3, that is, one photon for every 158,750,000 CO 2 molecules. The effect of the absorption and re-emission of the Earth’s radiation at this rate of photons must be completely insignificant as is the current rate of increase in CO 2 of 3.4 ppm per annum.
Conclusion:
The Executive Summary, page xi, of the UN IPCC report “Climate Change – The IPCC Scientific Assessment” 1990, stated:
“We calculate with confidence that:
some gases are potentially more effective than others at changing climate, and their relative effectiveness can be estimated Carbon dioxide has been responsible for over half the enhanced greenhouse effect in the past, and is likely to remain so in the future.”
Then in the Policymaker’s Summary, page xiii, it stated:
“ What natural factors are important? …….. One of the most important factors is the greenhouse effect, a simplified explanation of which is as follows – Short-wave solar radiation can pass through the clear atmosphere relatively unimpeded. But long-wave terrestrial radiation emitted by the warm surface of the Earth is partially absorbed and then re-emitted by a number of trace gases in the cooler atmosphere above. Since, on average, the outgoing long wave radiation balances the incoming solar radiation both the atmosphere and the surface will be warmer than they would be without the greenhouse gases”
Later reports have continued on this theme with an emphasis on the dire consequences that will arise from global warming and the associated climate change.
This analysis has shown that the greenhouse effect arising from the dominant long wavelength CO 2 absorption band emanating from the Earth’s surface at 288̊K cannot cause warming of the atmosphere or the surface, but perhaps cooling.
Radiation back into space from the shorter wavelength CO 2 absorption bands, emitted from the Sun, should have caused the Earth’s temperature to decrease as the CO 2 concentration increased.
Within the limits of measurement, neither of these events have taken place thereby negating the UN IPCC proposition that CO 2 has caused global warming or climate change. The factor of the order of 108 between the CO 2 molecular density in the atmosphere relative to the photon emission from the Earth’s surface shows why there is no measurable effect. This supports the findings from the analysis of climate data from stations across the globe that have shown that the atmospheric temperature is independent of the CO 2 concentration but correlates with the annual rate of change of CO 2 concentration due to climate change driving the change in CO 2 .
Update:
On 22 October 2020, the atmospheric CO 2 concentration at the Mauna Loa Observatory was 412.05 ppm. That equates to a density of 1.145 x 10+16 molecules of CO 2 per cubic centimetre. The four main absorption bands for CO 2 emit 6.929 x 10+7 photons per cm3, that is, one photon for every 165,300,000 CO 2 molecules from Planck’s law for a source temperature of 15̊C. Consequently all of the radiation from the four bands emitted from the Earth’s surface for an average temperature of 15̊C would have been absorbed within a few hundred metres of the surface, leaving the vast majority of the CO 2 molecules in their vibrational ground state.
Increasing or decreasing the atmospheric CO 2 concentration by a few hundred ppm would make no difference to this outcome other than decreasing or increasing the altitude at which complete absorption takes place. This supports earlier results from the analysis of data at a number of CO 2 stations across the globe that satellite lower troposphere temperature was independent of the CO 2 concentration. It also negates the current reason to stop the use of fossil fuel and shows that the CO 2 climate sensitivity metric used in climate simulation computer models is unwarranted, which is one reason why the model predictions are always wrong.
Furthermore the main absorption peak for CO 2 is at a wavelength of 14.97 microns, the peak for radiation from a source at -79.5̊C. That would likely cause cooling of the atmosphere, not warming except for the fact that the amount of energy involved is infinitesimal when spread through the Earth’s troposphere.
The UN IPCC, the Greens and the Socialist Left have caused unnecessary pain, anguish and expense with their unjustified claim that increasing CO 2 concentration has been the cause of the increase in the Earth’s atmospheric temperature over the past century as the Earth recovered from the Little Ice Age.
References:
W.J.Witteman, The absorption of thermal emitted infrared radiation by CO 2 .
https://principia-scientific.org/the-absorption-of-thermal-emitted-infrared-radiation-by-co2/
HITRAN website, http://www.hitran.ioa.ru , a collaboration between
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CFA), Cambridge, MA, USA,
V.E. Zuev Insitute of Atmosperic Optics (IAO), Tomsk, Russia
National Research Tomsk State University (TSU), Tomsk, Russia
About the author: Bevan Dockery, B.Sc.(Hons), Grad. Dip. Computing, retired geophysicist, formerly: Fellow of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists, Member of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Member of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Member of the European Association of Exploration Geophysicists, Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-28--Video: Informative Scientific Debate on Pros and Cons of Lockdown

Video : Informative Scientific Debate on Pros and Cons of Lockdown A very welcome television debate among science professionals on @ @ @ @ @ the policy around lockdown and the unintended consequences .
In the discussion is Professor John @ @ @ @ @ against lockdown and is opposed by lockdown defender , Assistant Professor Tomas Ryan .
Watch @ @ @ @ @ To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , @ @ @ @ @ as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street @ @ @ @ @ Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Video: Informative Scientific Debate on Pros and Cons of Lockdown
Written by Ivor Cummins BE(Chem) CEng MIEI PMP
A very welcome television debate among science professionals on the merits and demerits on the policy around lockdown and the unintended consequences.
In the discussion is Professor John Lee who makes the case against lockdown and is opposed by lockdown defender, Assistant Professor Tomas Ryan. Watch below:
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-28--Maine: Media Promote Shellfish Scare – As Harvest Set Records

Google News is promoting claims that global warming is killing off Maine ’ s shellfish .
However , objective data show that Maine is producing a record aquaculture harvest and Maine ’ s lobster catch is also setting records .
At the top of search results today for “ climate change , ” Google News is promoting a Sci-Tech Daily article titled , “ Iconic Food Web Threatened by Climate Change.
” The article cites a dubious new study asserting a decline in Maine shellfish during the past 20 years .
“ A dataset collected over two decades , including @ @ @ @ @ @ @ barnacles , and snails , shows that all have been experiencing declines , ” claims the article .
As the title of the article makes clear , the article blames the decline on climate change .
Nevertheless , the authors speculate many factors may be causing the asserted decline , including invasive crabs that feed on shellfish , pollution , and overharvesting .
Data from the Maine Department of Marine Resources ( DMR ) throws cold water on the assertion that global warming is killing off Maine ’ s shellfish .
The Maine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aquaculture harvest value set a new record last year .
The same is true for blue mussels , which were featured in the Sci-Tech Daily article .
The same is true for Maine oysters .
Some people may argue that aquaculture harvests are not necessarily an apples-to-apples comparison with the number of wild marine animals .
However , if global warming were imposing stress on wild marine-life populations , that same temperature stress should show up in marine aquaculture production .
Instead , Maine aquaculture production is setting records .
Indeed , Maine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was just a decade ago .
Maine oyster production is quadruple what it was a decade ago .
That is not what one would expect in increasingly temperature-stressed conditions .
Also , while the study promoted by Google News and Sci-Tech Daily relies on a speculative assessment of shellfish numbers , Maine ’ s wild lobster catch is also setting records .
The Maine DMR reports that each of the 10 highest annual lobster catches occurred during the past 10 years .
Lobster catches in Maine are presently double what they were just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is decimating Maine ’ s shellfish and other marine life , Mother Nature sure has a strange way of showing it .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Maine: Media Promote Shellfish Scare – As Harvest Set Records
Written by James Taylor
Google News is promoting claims that global warming is killing off Maine’s shellfish. However, objective data show that Maine is producing a record aquaculture harvest and Maine’s lobster catch is also setting records.
At the top of search results today for “climate change,” Google News is promoting a Sci-Tech Daily article titled, “Iconic Food Web Threatened by Climate Change.” The article cites a dubious new study asserting a decline in Maine shellfish during the past 20 years.
“A dataset collected over two decades, including numbers of five species of mussels, barnacles, and snails, shows that all have been experiencing declines,” claims the article.
As the title of the article makes clear, the article blames the decline on climate change. Nevertheless, the authors speculate many factors may be causing the asserted decline, including invasive crabs that feed on shellfish, pollution, and overharvesting.
Data from the Maine Department of Marine Resources (DMR) throws cold water on the assertion that global warming is killing off Maine’s shellfish.
The Maine DMR reports that Maine’s total aquaculture harvest value set a new record last year. The same is true for blue mussels, which were featured in the Sci-Tech Daily article. The same is true for Maine oysters.
Some people may argue that aquaculture harvests are not necessarily an apples-to-apples comparison with the number of wild marine animals.
However, if global warming were imposing stress on wild marine-life populations, that same temperature stress should show up in marine aquaculture production. Instead, Maine aquaculture production is setting records.
Indeed, Maine mussel production is currently double what it was just a decade ago. Maine oyster production is quadruple what it was a decade ago. That is not what one would expect in increasingly temperature-stressed conditions.
Also, while the study promoted by Google News and Sci-Tech Daily relies on a speculative assessment of shellfish numbers, Maine’s wild lobster catch is also setting records.
The Maine DMR reports that each of the 10 highest annual lobster catches occurred during the past 10 years. Lobster catches in Maine are presently double what they were just 20 years ago.
If global warming is decimating Maine’s shellfish and other marine life, Mother Nature sure has a strange way of showing it.
Read more at Climate Realism
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-28--The U.N. And Its Staggering Rise In Dishonesty

The U.N. And Its Staggering Rise In Dishonesty The UN did as only the UN can do , putting out a supposedly authoritative scientific report on “ staggering ” rise in climate disasters over the last 20 years that was seized upon with enthusiasm by the usual suspects .
Regrettably , the report itself turned out to be a climate disaster when it was pointed out that according to the data in the report disasters have been declining globally over the past 20 years .
Calls for the report ’ s retraction went unheeded , naturally , the fact that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the evidence being considered insufficient grounds for the UN to admit error .
If you ’ re wondering how they could be so stupid , it ’ s tempting to say lots and lots of practice .
And to point to the undoubted fact that climate alarmists have become so accustomed to running the table in the media and politically by dismissing their opponents as moral and mental defectives that they ’ ve become lazy .
But the technical answer is that they compared 2000-2019 with an earlier period , 1980-1999 , in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ far less rigorously carefully , so the number of disasters in the earlier period was understated .
As Paul Homewood observed , after citing readily available and widely known details of the process , “ Put simply , many more disasters are recorded nowadays because of better reporting systems .
But this does not mean more are actually occurring.
” If you think the UN was cherry-picking , you ’ re right .
If you think it was shamelessly cherry-picking , you ’ re completely right .
As Homewood shows , the improved @ @ @ @ @ @ @ collection system kicked in right at the end of… well , you saw it coming , right ?
The 1990s .
Indeed , “ there is a sharp jump in 1999/2000.
” Exactly the break between the two datasets the UN compared .
It ’ s not a subtle error ; indeed it is hard to convince oneself it is innocent though as so often , people very sure of what they ’ re going to find often manage to find it in a process of unconscious self-deception rather than the deliberate deceit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is underlined by one category in which we do seem to have fairly reliable data , namely deaths from natural disasters or , as the UN prefers to call them , “ climate-related disasters.
” Deaths are more likely to be noticed and recorded than other less serious results even of very serious events .
And , he says , “ Note that despite the claimed increase in disasters , the death toll has nearly halved , ” from 995,300 deaths due to “ 3,656 climate-related events ” in the earlier period to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 6,681 climate-related disasters ” in the latter .
It ’ s revealing that the report itself refers to “ events ” in the earlier period and “ disasters ” in the latter .
Because it ’ s not science , it ’ s propaganda in the worst sense of that word .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific @ @

The U.N. And Its Staggering Rise In Dishonesty
Written by Climate Discussion Nexus
The UN did as only the UN can do, putting out a supposedly authoritative scientific report on “staggering” rise in climate disasters over the last 20 years that was seized upon with enthusiasm by the usual suspects.
Regrettably, the report itself turned out to be a climate disaster when it was pointed out that according to the data in the report disasters have been declining globally over the past 20 years.
Calls for the report’s retraction went unheeded, naturally, the fact that the conclusions were the exact opposite of the evidence being considered insufficient grounds for the UN to admit error.
If you’re wondering how they could be so stupid, it’s tempting to say lots and lots of practice.
And to point to the undoubted fact that climate alarmists have become so accustomed to running the table in the media and politically by dismissing their opponents as moral and mental defectives that they’ve become lazy.
But the technical answer is that they compared 2000-2019 with an earlier period, 1980-1999, in which data was known to be collected far less rigorously carefully, so the number of disasters in the earlier period was understated.
As Paul Homewood observed, after citing readily available and widely known details of the process, “Put simply, many more disasters are recorded nowadays because of better reporting systems. But this does not mean more are actually occurring.”
If you think the UN was cherry-picking, you’re right. If you think it was shamelessly cherry-picking, you’re completely right.
As Homewood shows, the improved (and better-funded by USAID) data collection system kicked in right at the end of… well, you saw it coming, right? The 1990s.
Indeed, “there is a sharp jump in 1999/2000.” Exactly the break between the two datasets the UN compared.
It’s not a subtle error; indeed it is hard to convince oneself it is innocent though as so often, people very sure of what they’re going to find often manage to find it in a process of unconscious self-deception rather than the deliberate deceit of others.
Homewood’s point is underlined by one category in which we do seem to have fairly reliable data, namely deaths from natural disasters or, as the UN prefers to call them, “climate-related disasters.”
Deaths are more likely to be noticed and recorded than other less serious results even of very serious events.
And, he says, “Note that despite the claimed increase in disasters, the death toll has nearly halved,” from 995,300 deaths due to “3,656 climate-related events” in the earlier period to 510,837 deaths due to a reported “6,681 climate-related disasters” in the latter.
It’s revealing that the report itself refers to “events” in the earlier period and “disasters” in the latter. Because it’s not science, it’s propaganda in the worst sense of that word.
Read more at CDN
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-11-11--COVID Fraud: Lawyers File Action Against Corrupt Australian Government

Principia Scientific International has received information from the Concerned Lawyer ’ s Network .
This is the first part of their legal action explained .
We will do a follow-up article on their actions and evidence .
TO : Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews , Victorian Chief Health Officer Brett Sutton , Prime Minister Scott Morrison , Federal Chief Health Officer Paul Kelly AND to others named in the schedule attached .
Signed on behalf of Concerned Lawyers Network : Maria Rigoli B.A .
LLB .
( Melbourne University ) Acc.Spec ( Fam ) Jeff Tran B Science LLB ( Melbourne @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Practice ( UK ) ( LLB ) ( HONS ) Shemarrah Davis LLB ( Monash University ) Tony Nikolic LLB Criminology ( Uni .
Western Sydney ) LLM ( College of law ) Liesl Tziolis B.A , LLB , ( Hons , Uni of Qld ) , MBA Concerned Lawyers Network All “ exhibits ” referred to are found on : www.concernedlawyersnetwork.net We , the undersigned on behalf of the Concerned Lawyers Network ( on behalf of pending clients , victims , and those with legal standing and this lawyer network ) write @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and wind back of measures taken by Victorian and Australian governments which were based on the premise of a Covid19 pandemic existing and/or continuing , leading to declared states of emergency , states of disaster and other related legal measures .
We respectfully give you notice of potential liabilities , should there be continued reliance on this premise and subsequent overreach of powers , whilst there is overwhelming evidence against such a premise .
1 .
Covid19 ( if it can be isolated ) may simply be another coronavirus such as the flu @ @ @ @ @ @ @ medical testing kits , however , were manufactured and sold many years ago to many countries including Australia .
• The WHO has falsely declared a pandemic in relation to Covid19 .
• Covid19 death statistics in Australia as well as in other nations have been manipulated .
• Covid19 tests are unreliable to test any specific disease .
• There are global agendas behind the declaration of Covid19 pandemic , to benefit certain foreign individuals and companies financially and to gain control of populations including in Australia .
• There is no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ most a seasonal flu type epidemic , nothing justifying declaring states of emergency or disaster .
Covid19 has been found to be a type of flu ( coronavirus ) with an estimated 99.9 % survival rate across all age groups with the highest risk groups of over 65 estimated at 99.6 % .
• Confined steps can be taken to take care of elderly or immune-compromised people more likely to suffer from Covid19 as has been the case in the past with influenza , without restricting the freedoms of masses of healthy people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interest between some representatives of government , appointed health officials and taskforces , and pharmaceutical corporations and global interests that prioritise their own profits and control , instead of the health interests of Australians .
• Australians have been exploited through fear , misinformation and obstruction of freedoms as a result of the continuation of the false statement that there is a Covid19 pandemic and the insistence that they must obey disproportional laws , rules and directions that curtail them physically , mentally and financially causing them much harm including in some cases @ @ @ @ @ @ @ governments and the public service have enormous conflicts of interests relating to vaccine com panies and other medical manufacturers and suppliers , influencing their decisions .
They are also being influenced by global players and global policy instead of the Australian people who elected them .
Covid19 has been used as a cover to bring about police states and financially benefit vaccine companies as well as those who with vested interests in vaccine companies and controlling populations .
• All ministers and other persons to whom this letter is addressed are PUT ON @ @ @ @ @ @ @ potentially arising against them for any current or future intentional or reckless continuation of misrepresentation of information and misuse of power of of fice , causing direct loss and damage to Australians .
• All other officeholders to which this letter is copied to , are also put on notice of the evidence and potential civil and criminal liability arising out of future claims that may also possibly affect them arising out of their decision making or carrying out of decisions of their superiors should such actions violate citizens ’ human rights .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ victims and other interested Victorians and Australians , and the lawyers network , we request an immediate wind back of lockdowns and other disproportionate measures made , and a full open up of the economy and society to the way it was prior those measures being put in place and enforced ( pre-January 2020 ) .
• In addition to potential claims based on future personal liability , we reserve our clients ’ rights to take legal action against you with respect to past damage and losses incurred up to this point in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ response to specific questions in this letter addressed to you .
As experienced lawyers , we are evidence based .
From expert and other evidence that is publicly available in Australia and worldwide , there appears to be strong evidence that there can no longer be a reliance on the premise that the Covid19 pandemic exists .
Further , it appears evident that the state and federal governments have : • failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians of sufficient relevant and independent evidence of a pandemic to justify the declarations of state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and • failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians , ( or take into account in their decision making relevant and independent evidence ) , of Covid19 being confirmed as an isolated virus or how effective the testing for it actually is ; and • failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians of , or take into account in their decision making , the evidence of effective treatment for Covid19 such as Invermectin and Hydroxychloroquine and any good reasons why such medications were banned all of a sudden .
This is especially contradictory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decades safely all around the world both as an oral vaccine and treatment to many diseases including Lupus and Malaria and doctors and evidence worldwide reveals reports of up to 100 % cure rate for Covid19 when treated early ; and • failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians of , or take into account in their decision making relevant and independent evidence of the serious side effects of vaccines in general including death , and the need for years of successful research before releasing medications in general ; and • failed to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or take into account in their decision making , financial or vested interests ( of ministers , health officials and public services and subordinate bodies appointed by them ) , in vaccine production , and the legal protection granted to the vaccine companies in the event of injury or death from citizens taking vaccines ; and • failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians through health policy , on how we are best to increase our health and immune systems to resist infections ; and • failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians @ @ @ @ @ @ @ numbers and specific not random , and include comorbidity deaths .
Focus has been instead shifted to fear of the deadliness of the disease , and away from the facts that most mortality affected the elderly or immune-compromised who are already susceptible due to preexisting conditions or comorbidity ; and • failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians of , or take into account in their decision making , the available relevant and independent medicine and science about viruses , exomes and the body ’ s natural defence systems and instead relied on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ themselves have vested financial or other interests in foreign , global and transnational companies which are of or related to foreign pharmaceutical and vaccine corporations ; and • failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians of , or take into account in their decision making , the true nature of the covid19 tests being used , that they are not reliable , focusing instead on numbers of “ positive cases ” including false positives and undiagnosed positives when the tests are deemed by the governments own TGA standards not reliable and there has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Covid19 in any case ; and • failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians of , or take into account in their decision making , the fact that the covid19 tests being used were manufactured and distributed to countries around the world ( with Australian purchasing great quantities ) since at least 2017 over 3 years before the surprise outbreak of Covid19 in late 2019 , and that patents specifically for the Covid19 test kits were already applied for in 2015 some 5 years ago which gives rise to suspicions of a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ properly inform Victorians and Australians about , or take into account in their decision making , the ramifications of providing financial incentive to clinicians and hospitals whenever they register a death under Covid19 ; and • failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians about , or take into account in their decision making , the ramifications of financial incentives and loans the Federal Government receives from the IMF and WHO and other foreign bodies or corporations , in exchange for following the directions on declaring a pandemic and how to manage it and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ freedom of movement from these global bodies .
Further , most of the mainstream media on television and print , appears to have been influenced by state and federal governments in so far as such media has avoided challenging the government narrative about Covid19 , and has therefore also failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians who are entitled to see all relevant unbiased evidence without censorship .
In addition , much of the mainstream media has been disparaging of any person questioning the government narrative and science and legalities relied on , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doctors and lawyers .
Many of us wonder if the government has itself withheld relevant information and facts from the media , or whether the media are in fact complicit with the government in recklessly or intentionally failing to report relevant facts to the public , in an unbiased true journalistic basis .
Regardless of whether one believes the Covid19 virus exists , does not exist , exists organically or exists man made/manufactured or otherwise , the questions to answer in light of available relevant and independent evidence are : • What is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an “ epidemic ” ?
Was there or is there still a “ pandemic ” in the true sense of the word ?
; • Were the measures that were and some still are taken in response to the alleged pandemic by the Australian and state governments restricting its citizens – justified and proportionate and compatible with international law , human rights laws and the Australian Constitution ?
• If there is no pandemic or the alleged pandemic has abated , or there was instead a seasonal epidemic or something less , can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ still be justified and if so up to what point in time ?
• If there is no such justification and in light of available independent and relevant evidence , what are the legal liabilities and exposures of Australian decision makers in the chain of command ?
( taking into account , inter alia , the directly related losses and damages including inter alia suicides , increase in crime and domestic violence , mass mental health deterioration , curtailed freedoms to travel , unlawful arrests , unlawful detainment , unlawful testing , unlawful @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , not for profit and other organisations and individuals , closed and bankrupted businesses , interference with landlord and tenant rights , interference with doctor and patient relationships , infringement on property use , mortgage foreclosures , failure to account for basis of decision making , misleading the people and a crashed economy ) .
These are not just scientific and medical questions , but questions of law .
DEFINITION OF “ PANDEMIC ” According to the World Health Organisation ( WHO ) : “ A pandemic is defined as “ an epidemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wide area , crossing international boundaries and usually affecting a large number of people ” .
The classical definition includes nothing about population immunity , virology or disease severity .
By this definition , pandemics can be said to occur annually in each of the temperate southern and northern hemispheres , given that seasonal epidemics cross international boundaries and affect a large number of people .
However , seasonal epidemics are not considered pandemics.
” The definition was changed by the WHO in 2020 and now appears to describe what is a regular @ @ @ @ @ @ @ We do not believe this definition can legally or morally or ethically stand to influence health policy and modelling for nations around the world including Australia .
A case study of the 2009 Swine Flu Pandemic reveals a European Parliamentary Inquiry determined that WHO manipulated information to fraudulently declare a pandemic , activating lucrative ‘ sleeping contracts ’ with pharmaceutical companies .
It is also revealed that the Australian Department of Health misrepresented statistical data to alarm the public about swine flu , although this was alarm was unjustified .
The government ordered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that swine flu was more serious than other strains of flu ( in the end , it wasn ’ t . )
see page 120 and 154-159 HARRISON REPORT .
In the past the WHO has been found to have falsely declared a “ pandemic ” for example the Swine Flu .
https : //www.abc.net.au/news/2010-06-11/34926 see EXHIBIT RESEARCH REPORTS PANDEMIC Modelling has been based on the WHO ’ s shifting goal posts of what a “ pandemic ” really means .
The modelling used for international policy response is based on unpublished , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Some ) Australian modellers have appear to have deep financial ties to pharmaceutical companies and conflicted global power structures such as the Gates Foundation and Gavi ( Vaccine Alliance ) .
For the full document and the evidence please LINK HERE .
We will add further sections of their research and case against the government in future articles .
Please DONATE to HELP support our ongoing battle to expose the COVID-19 FRAUD !
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method

COVID Fraud: Lawyers File Action Against Corrupt Australian Government
Written by John O'Sullivan
Principia Scientific International has received information from the Concerned Lawyer’s Network. This is the first part of their legal action explained. We will do a follow-up article on their actions and evidence.
TO: Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews,
Victorian Chief Health Officer Brett Sutton,
Prime Minister Scott Morrison,
Federal Chief Health Officer Paul Kelly
AND to others named in the schedule attached.
Signed on behalf of Concerned Lawyers Network:
Maria Rigoli B.A. LLB. (Melbourne University) Acc.Spec (Fam)
Jeff Tran B Science LLB (Melbourne)
Russell Sumner LLM GDipDisRes Post GradDLegal Practice (UK)(LLB) (HONS)
Shemarrah Davis LLB (Monash University)
Tony Nikolic LLB Criminology (Uni. Western Sydney) LLM (College of law)
Liesl Tziolis B.A, LLB, (Hons, Uni of Qld), MBA
Concerned Lawyers Network All “exhibits” referred to are found on: www.concernedlawyersnetwork.net
Re: Notice of Liability & Potential Claims
We, the undersigned on behalf of the Concerned Lawyers Network (on behalf of pending clients, victims, and those with legal standing and this lawyer network) write this open letter to request a review and wind back of measures taken by Victorian and Australian governments which were based on the premise of a Covid19 pandemic existing and/or continuing, leading to declared states of emergency, states of disaster and other related legal measures. We respectfully give you notice of potential liabilities, should there be continued reliance on this premise and subsequent overreach of powers, whilst there is overwhelming evidence against such a premise.
SUMMARY POINTS
1. Covid19 (if it can be isolated) may simply be another coronavirus such as the flu or common cold. Patents for Covid19 medical testing kits, however, were manufactured and sold many years ago to many countries including Australia.
The WHO has falsely declared a pandemic in relation to Covid19. Covid19 death statistics in Australia as well as in other nations have been manipulated. Covid19 tests are unreliable to test any specific disease. There are global agendas behind the declaration of Covid19 pandemic, to benefit certain foreign individuals and companies financially and to gain control of populations including in Australia. There is no pandemic in Australia according to medical evidence-at most a seasonal flu type epidemic, nothing justifying declaring states of emergency or disaster. Covid19 has been found to be a type of flu (coronavirus) with an
estimated 99.9% survival rate across all age groups with the highest risk groups of over 65 estimated at 99.6%. Confined steps can be taken to take care of elderly or immune-compromised people more likely to suffer from Covid19 as has been the case in the past with influenza, without restricting the freedoms of masses of healthy people. There are serious conflicts of interest between some representatives of government, appointed health officials and taskforces, and pharmaceutical corporations and global interests that prioritise their own profits and control,
instead of the health interests of Australians. Australians have been exploited through fear, misinformation and obstruction of freedoms as a result of the continuation of the false statement that there is a Covid19 pandemic and the insistence that they must obey disproportional laws, rules and directions that curtail them physically, mentally and financially causing them much harm including in some cases death. Key decision-makers in Australian governments and the public service have enormous conflicts of interests relating to vaccine com panies and other medical manufacturers and suppliers, influencing their decisions. They are also being influenced by global players and global policy instead of the Australian people who elected them. Covid19 has been used as a cover to bring about police states and financially benefit vaccine companies as well as those who with vested interests in vaccine companies and controlling populations. All ministers and other persons to whom this letter is addressed are PUT ON NOTICE of Personal Civil And Criminal Liability potentially arising against them for any current or future intentional or reckless continuation of misrepresentation of information and misuse of power of of fice, causing direct loss and damage to Australians. All other officeholders to which this letter is copied to, are also put on notice of the evidence and potential civil and criminal liability arising out of future claims that may also possibly affect them arising out of their decision making or carrying out of decisions of their superiors should such actions violate citizens’ human rights. On behalf of our clients, victims and other interested Victorians and Australians, and the lawyers network, we request an immediate wind back of lockdowns and other disproportionate measures made, and a full open up of the economy and society to the way it was prior those measures being put in place and enforced (pre-January 2020). In addition to potential claims based on future personal liability, we reserve our clients’ rights to take legal action against you with respect to past damage and losses incurred up to this point in time. We also request your response to specific questions in this letter addressed to you.
OPENING STATEMENT
As experienced lawyers, we are evidence based.
From expert and other evidence that is publicly available in Australia and worldwide, there appears to be strong evidence that there can no longer be a reliance on the premise that the Covid19 pandemic exists. Further, it appears evident that the state and federal governments have:
failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians of sufficient relevant and independent evidence of a pandemic to justify the declarations of state of emergency and state of disaster; and failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians, (or take into account in their decision making relevant and independent evidence), of Covid19 being confirmed as an isolated virus or how effective the testing for it actually is; and failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians of, or take into account in their decision making, the evidence of effective treatment for Covid19 such as Invermectin and Hydroxychloroquine and any good reasons why such medications were banned all of a sudden. This is especially contradictory, since Hydroxychloroquine has been used for decades safely all around the world both as an oral vaccine and treatment to many diseases including Lupus and Malaria and doctors and evidence worldwide reveals reports of up to 100% cure rate for Covid19 when treated early; and failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians of, or take into account in their decision making relevant and independent evidence of the serious side effects of vaccines in general including death, and the need for years of successful research before releasing medications in general; and failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians of, or take into account in their decision making, financial or vested interests (of ministers, health officials and public services and subordinate bodies appointed by them), in vaccine production, and the legal protection granted to the vaccine companies in the event of injury or death from citizens taking vaccines; and failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians through health policy, on how we are best to increase our health and immune systems to resist infections; and failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians that Covid19 deaths reported are inaccurate in numbers and specific not random, and include comorbidity deaths. Focus has been instead shifted to fear of the deadliness of the disease, and away from the facts that most mortality affected the elderly or immune-compromised who are already susceptible due to preexisting conditions or comorbidity; and failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians of, or take into account in their decision making, the available relevant and independent medicine and science about viruses, exomes and the body’s natural defence systems and instead relied on a select few researchers many of which themselves have vested financial or other interests in foreign, global and transnational companies which are of or related to foreign pharmaceutical and vaccine corporations; and failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians of, or take into account in their decision making, the true nature of the covid19 tests being used, that they are not reliable, focusing instead on numbers of “positive cases” including false positives and undiagnosed positives when the tests are deemed by the governments own TGA standards not reliable and there has to date not been any credible isolation of Covid19 in any case; and failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians of, or take into account in their decision making, the fact that the covid19 tests being used were manufactured and distributed to countries around the world (with Australian purchasing great quantities) since at least 2017 over 3 years before the surprise outbreak of Covid19 in late 2019, and that patents specifically for the Covid19 test kits were already applied for in 2015 some 5 years ago which gives rise to suspicions of a planned pandemic; and failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians about, or take into account in their decision making, the ramifications of providing financial incentive to clinicians and hospitals whenever they register a death under Covid19; and failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians about, or take into account in their decision making, the ramifications of financial incentives and loans the Federal Government receives from the IMF and WHO and other foreign bodies or corporations, in exchange for following the directions on declaring a pandemic and how to manage it and what restrictions to place on business and freedom of movement
from these global bodies.
Further, most of the mainstream media on television and print, appears to have been influenced by state and federal governments in so far as such media has avoided challenging the government narrative about Covid19, and has therefore also failed to properly inform Victorians and Australians who are entitled to see all relevant unbiased evidence without censorship. In addition, much of the mainstream media has been disparaging of any person questioning the government narrative and science and legalities relied on, even when they are questioned by experienced doctors and lawyers. Many of us wonder if the government has itself
withheld relevant information and facts from the media, or whether the media are in fact complicit with the government in recklessly or intentionally failing to report relevant facts to the public, in an unbiased true journalistic basis.
LEGAL QUESTIONS
Regardless of whether one believes the Covid19 virus exists, does not exist, exists organically or exists man made/manufactured or otherwise, the questions to answer in light of available relevant and independent evidence are:
What is a “pandemic” as opposed to an “epidemic”? Was there or is there still a “pandemic” in the true sense of the word?; Were the measures that were and some still are taken in response to the alleged pandemic by the Australian and state governments restricting its citizens – justified and proportionate and compatible with international law, human rights laws and the Australian Constitution? If there is no pandemic or the alleged pandemic has abated, or there was instead a seasonal epidemic or something less, can any of the measures taken by governments still be justified and if so up to what point in time? If there is no such justification and in light of available independent and relevant evidence, what are the legal liabilities and exposures of Australian decision makers in the chain of command? (taking into account, inter alia, the directly related losses and damages including inter alia suicides, increase in crime and domestic violence, mass mental health deterioration, curtailed freedoms to travel, unlawful arrests, unlawful detainment, unlawful testing, unlawful mass financial losses to businesses, employees, not for profit and other organisations and individuals, closed and bankrupted businesses, interference with landlord and tenant rights, interference with doctor and patient relationships, infringement on property use, mortgage foreclosures, failure to account for basis of decision making, misleading the people and a crashed economy).
These are not just scientific and medical questions, but questions of law.
FACTS & EVIDENCE
DEFINITION OF “PANDEMIC”
According to the World Health Organisation (WHO):
“A pandemic is defined as “an epidemic occurring worldwide, or over a very wide area, crossing international boundaries and usually affecting a large number of people”. The classical definition includes nothing about population immunity, virology or disease severity. By this definition, pandemics can be said to occur annually in each of the temperate southern and northern hemispheres, given that seasonal epidemics cross international boundaries and affect a large number of people. However, seasonal epidemics are not considered pandemics.”
The definition was changed by the WHO in 2020 and now appears to describe what is a regular seasonal epidemic of colds and flu. We do not believe this definition can legally or morally or ethically stand to influence health policy and modelling for nations around the world including Australia.
FALSE PANDEMICS OF THE PAST
A case study of the 2009 Swine Flu Pandemic reveals a European Parliamentary Inquiry determined that WHO manipulated information to fraudulently declare a pandemic, activating lucrative ‘sleeping contracts’ with pharmaceutical companies. It is also revealed that the Australian Department of Health misrepresented statistical data to alarm the public about swine flu, although this was alarm was unjustified. The government ordered vaccines prepared before there was any evidence that swine flu was more serious than other strains of flu (in the end, it wasn’t.) see page 120 and 154-159 HARRISON REPORT.
In the past the WHO has been found to have falsely declared a “pandemic” for example the Swine Flu. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2010-06-11/34926 see EXHIBIT RESEARCH REPORTS PANDEMIC
Modelling has been based on the WHO’s shifting goal posts of what a “pandemic” really means. The modelling used for international policy response is based on unpublished, unverified 13 year old code. (Some) Australian modellers have appear to have deep financial ties to pharmaceutical companies and conflicted global power structures such as the Gates Foundation and Gavi (Vaccine Alliance).
For the full document and the evidence please LINK HERE. We will add further sections of their research and case against the government in future articles.
Please DONATE to HELP support our ongoing battle to expose the COVID-19 FRAUD!
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related