principiascientificinternational--2020-09-26--COVID19: ‘test, test, test’ is ‘wrong, wrong wrong’

As reported in the New York Times last week ( September 17 , 2020 ) a dose of sanity appeared at the CDC when it finally decided it was probably better policy to not test people who have no symptoms of Covid-19 .
Obviously , the announcement triggered dissent from all the profiteers of the scamdemic .
This includes the NY Times itself , which then went on to lament this step towards common sense by then quoting a string of medical professionals ( with skin in the game ) who refuse to see the bigger picture of the damage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lockdown ’ policies , i.e .
the hidden non-COVID deaths due to deferred operations , undiagnosed cancers , suicides , depression , business bankruptcies , domestic abuse , etc .
The New York Times , biased medicos , big corporations , our politicians and all fellow pandemic profiteers want to test everyone for COVID19 because the more we test , the more these flawed tests will throw out ‘ asymptomatic ’ ( not sick ) positives .
This then creates the huge rise in ‘ cases ’ reported daily in the media to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
As we reported before , the key to the insanity is the PCR test relied on for ‘ diagnosing ’ COVID19 – a test which was never designed or certified to be used as a virus diagnostic tool and is known to be incorrect 90 percent of the time .
It is unscientific and immoral – and possibly criminal – for government ( s ) to portray it as such .
Indeed , do you remember the time before this snowflake , precautionary principle mindset froze society ?
A time when old @ @ @ @ @ @ @ never test anyone who presents no symptoms and only test a patient who actually presents themselves as feeling ill from what appears to be a respiratory disease .
In the UK our dullard Prime Minister , Boris Johnson , made it policy to test at least 100,000 every day !
Any epidemiologist worthy of that title could tell that the more you search for a disease the more likely you will find it .
And as time has gone on , more researchers are showing COVID-19 may not be infectious at all .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ deceptive on this issue because it quietly downgraded the status of the disease as a ‘ High consequence infectious diseases ( HCID ) ’ on March 19 , 2020 , the week before it implemented the national ‘ lockdown.
’ Deception , fear-mongering and fake science were the tools used to brow beat the public into compliance ready for the World Economic Forum ’ s ‘ Great Reset ’ – which is more about imposing global un-elected socialist government than public health .
As with man-made global warming , the underpinning of this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Disease , not climate change , was the new Great Danger .
Fear of infection and death from this novel coronavirus worked for a while .
But six months into this incessant panic porn and – as we saw with global warming hype – the science begins to unravel .
All those labelled as carriers are not infecting others .
Large outbreaks of the ‘ infection ’ are occurring mostly where testing is happening most frequently .
Can you see the problem here ?
At some point even the average low information voter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that this pandemic now is all about ‘ CASES ’ as opposed to deaths ( see graph below ) As we exposed in earlier articles , the mainstream narrative is based on increased PCR testing showing more positive results .
The so-called journalists who are paid six-figure salaries to analyze and discern truth from fiction are exposed as mere shills to their corporate puppet masters and do not ( can not ) report the deception going on here .
Our political masters have been deliberately misconstruing covid ‘ cases ’ as ‘ infections @ @ @ @ @ @ @ passed in May .
Talking heads on television news have been all in on fooling the masses with ideas of ‘ asymptomatic ’ spread .
But there is no scientific evidence to back that claim .
But what is provable scientifically is that the tests commonly relied on – the polymerase chain reaction ( PCR ) tests – are known to give False Positives in as many as 9 out of 10 instances , ( see Study Finds Immunity to Coronavirus Linked to the Common Cold ) .
As we explained in other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ PCR ) method is simply a clever manufacturing technique for quickly making millions , even billions , of copies of a specific DNA sample .
The sole purpose of the test , according to inventor , Kary Mullins , was to help scientists work from a very small sample of DNA and multiply ( or ‘ amplify ’ ) it to more clinically usable amounts for lab study .
And let ’ s keep in mind that 20 percent of common colds are due to coronavirus .
[ 1 ] Over time , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ colleagues , friends and family who have themselves , or known via someone else , instances where someone has tested positive for COVID19 but they report they feel perfectly fine .
As the joke goes : it is the only deadly disease you need to be tested for to know if you have it .
The tests themselves are wholly unreliable for medical diagnosis because they can not offer a binary – yes or no – answer to any question .
They may show the presence of a very , very small part @ @ @ @ @ @ @ particular set of nucleotide ) that may , or may not be from the COVID virus .
But as to proving someone is actually ill – not possible !
The PCR test is a manufacturing process of multiplying cycles to grow RNA – a slick technique for biological replication in a lab .
Technically , the output from them may be deemed ‘ scientifically meaningless.
’ Meaningless because the more each PCR test cycle is repeated in the lab the more any error in the sampling gets magnified .
The common protocol for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ PCR ’ s is to run 30 to 40 reproduction ( amplification ) cycles .
As stated above , the outcome is not a binary positive or negative outcome as you would find , for example , with a pregnancy test .
Instead , the samples are grown repeatedly until an arbitrary point is reached ( because there is no standard protocol ) when someone decides to call a halt in the amplification cycling process and a subjective determination of ‘ positive ’ or ‘ negative ’ gets made .
Is this good @ @ @ @ @ @ @ effect , that is 30 to 40 times a magnification of the original error in sampling .
In Britain the NHS is typically repeating the reproduction cycle 45 times and disingenuously creating a massive ‘ spread ’ of false positives .
Also see https : //jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2766097 We must hold our leaders and their appointed experts in the health bureaucracy to account .
The longer this travesty of ‘ test , test , test ’ continues the more they get away with the Big Lie of asymptomatic COVID19 and the more needless harm is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ word to anyone who still hasn ’ t got the message : these so-called PCR positive ‘ Cases ’ are NOT proof of an infection .
Better yet , tell them that the CDC even now admits almost NO ONE dies from COVID19 .
[ 2 ] The scientific and medical experts have failed the public consistently during this COVID-19 scamdemic .
The cause may go further than mere incompetence , with a corrupt elite likely exploiting the crisis to push their preferred technocratic political agenda of totalitarian globalism .
If the fools @ @ @ @ @ @ @ PCR test as a diagnostic tool – despite a relentless stream of hard evidence – then they must be brought to justice for abuse of public office .
Because it is clear that the key beneficiaries of this pandemic farce are the big corporations , online businesses , pharmaceutical companies and academics who profit from the crony capitalist misery inflicted on us all .
About the author : John O ’ Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder ( with Dr Tim Ball ) of Principia Scientific International ( PSI ) .
John is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert , Michael ‘ hockey stick ’ Mann in the ‘ science trial of the century ‘ .
O ’ Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘ Slayers ’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world ’ s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester @ @ @ @ @ @ @ DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

COVID19: ‘test, test, test’ is ‘wrong, wrong wrong’
Written by John O'Sullivan
As reported in the New York Times last week (September 17, 2020) a dose of sanity appeared at the CDC when it finally decided it was probably better policy to not test people who have no symptoms of Covid-19.
As the NY Times reported:
“The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention quietly modified its coronavirus testing guidelines this week to exclude people who do not have symptoms of Covid-19 — even if they have been recently exposed to the virus.”
Obviously, the announcement triggered dissent from all the profiteers of the scamdemic. This includes the NY Times itself, which then went on to lament this step towards common sense by then quoting a string of medical professionals (with skin in the game) who refuse to see the bigger picture of the damage inflicted on society because of the ‘lockdown’ policies, i.e. the hidden non-COVID deaths due to deferred operations, undiagnosed cancers, suicides, depression, business bankruptcies, domestic abuse, etc.
The New York Times, biased medicos, big corporations, our politicians and all fellow pandemic profiteers want to test everyone for COVID19 because the more we test, the more these flawed tests will throw out ‘asymptomatic’ (not sick) positives. This then creates the huge rise in ‘cases’ reported daily in the media to justify more draconian ‘lockdown’ measures.
As we reported before, the key to the insanity is the PCR test relied on for ‘diagnosing’ COVID19 – a test which was never designed or certified to be used as a virus diagnostic tool and is known to be incorrect 90 percent of the time. It is unscientific and immoral – and possibly criminal – for government(s) to portray it as such.
Indeed, do you remember the time before this snowflake, precautionary principle mindset froze society? A time when old school medicine taught us that you generally never test anyone who presents no symptoms and only test a patient who actually presents themselves as feeling ill from what appears to be a respiratory disease.
In the UK our dullard Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, made it policy to test at least 100,000 every day! Any epidemiologist worthy of that title could tell that the more you search for a disease the more likely you will find it.
And as time has gone on, more researchers are showing COVID-19 may not be infectious at all. We know that the UK government was deceptive on this issue because it quietly downgraded the status of the disease as a ‘High consequence infectious diseases (HCID)’ on March 19, 2020, the week before it implemented the national ‘lockdown.’
Deception, fear-mongering and fake science were the tools used to brow beat the public into compliance ready for the World Economic Forum’s ‘Great Reset’ – which is more about imposing global un-elected socialist government than public health.
As with man-made global warming, the underpinning of this planned societal shift was junk science. Disease, not climate change, was the new Great Danger. Fear of infection and death from this novel coronavirus worked for a while.
But six months into this incessant panic porn and – as we saw with global warming hype – the science begins to unravel. All those labelled as carriers are not infecting others. Large outbreaks of the ‘infection’ are occurring mostly where testing is happening most frequently. Can you see the problem here?
At some point even the average low information voter wakes up to the screamingly obvious fact that this pandemic now is all about ‘CASES’ as opposed to deaths (see graph below)
As we exposed in earlier articles, the mainstream narrative is based on increased PCR testing showing more positive results. The so-called journalists who are paid six-figure salaries to analyze and discern truth from fiction are exposed as mere shills to their corporate puppet masters and do not (cannot) report the deception going on here.
Our political masters have been deliberately misconstruing covid ‘cases’ as ‘infections’ since the peak of the pandemic passed in May. Talking heads on television news have been all in on fooling the masses with ideas of ‘asymptomatic’ spread.
But there is no scientific evidence to back that claim. But what is provable scientifically is that the tests commonly relied on – the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests – are known to give False Positives in as many as 9 out of 10 instances, (see Study Finds Immunity to Coronavirus Linked to the Common Cold ).
As we explained in other articles, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method is simply a clever manufacturing technique for quickly making millions, even billions, of copies of a specific DNA sample. The sole purpose of the test, according to inventor, Kary Mullins, was to help scientists work from a very small sample of DNA and multiply (or ‘amplify’) it to more clinically usable amounts for lab study.
And let’s keep in mind that 20 percent of common colds are due to coronavirus. [1]
Over time, many of us have become aware of colleagues, friends and family who have themselves, or known via someone else, instances where someone has tested positive for COVID19 but they report they feel perfectly fine. As the joke goes: it is the only deadly disease you need to be tested for to know if you have it.
The tests themselves are wholly unreliable for medical diagnosis because they cannot offer a binary – yes or no – answer to any question. They may show the presence of a very, very small part of a piece of matter (a particular set of nucleotide) that may, or may not be from the COVID virus. But as to proving someone is actually ill – not possible!
The PCR test is a manufacturing process of multiplying cycles to grow RNA – a slick technique for biological replication in a lab. Technically, the output from them may be deemed ‘scientifically meaningless.’
Meaningless because the more each PCR test cycle is repeated in the lab the more any error in the sampling gets magnified.
The common protocol for most labs performing COVID testing with these PCR’s is to run 30 to 40 reproduction (amplification) cycles. As stated above, the outcome is not a binary positive or negative outcome as you would find, for example, with a pregnancy test.
Instead, the samples are grown repeatedly until an arbitrary point is reached (because there is no standard protocol) when someone decides to call a halt in the amplification cycling process and a subjective determination of ‘positive’ or ‘negative’ gets made. Is this good science? Not at all.
In effect, that is 30 to 40 times a magnification of the original error in sampling. In Britain the NHS is typically repeating the reproduction cycle 45 times and disingenuously creating a massive ‘spread’ of false positives.
Also see https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2766097
We must hold our leaders and their appointed experts in the health bureaucracy to account. The longer this travesty of ‘test, test, test’ continues the more they get away with the Big Lie of asymptomatic COVID19 and the more needless harm is inflicted on society.
Please spread the word to anyone who still hasn’t got the message: these so-called PCR positive ‘Cases’ are NOT proof of an infection. Better yet, tell them that the CDC even now admits almost NO ONE dies from COVID19. [2]
The scientific and medical experts have failed the public consistently during this COVID-19 scamdemic. The cause may go further than mere incompetence, with a corrupt elite likely exploiting the crisis to push their preferred technocratic political agenda of totalitarian globalism.
If the fools in government do not soon disavow the PCR test as a diagnostic tool – despite a relentless stream of hard evidence – then they must be brought to justice for abuse of public office. Because it is clear that the key beneficiaries of this pandemic farce are the big corporations, online businesses, pharmaceutical companies and academics who profit from the crony capitalist misery inflicted on us all.
[1] https://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/cold-guide/common_cold_causes
[2] https://principia-scientific.com/cdc-latest-confession-almost-no-one-infected-died-from-covid19/
About the author: John O’Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI). John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-27--Israel’s ‘Before & After’ Proves HCQ Beats COVID19

The Times of Israel reveals an astonishing fact that concerns us all in the battle against the current coronavirus pandemic .
The respected newspaper points to that nation ’ s mortality data before and after a change in public policy on the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat the symptoms associated with COVID19 .
That data may be a bitter pill to swallow for fanatical vaccine manufacturers and promoters .
Times of Israel reporter , Barry Shaw , set the stage thus : Shaw then poses the question : what did Israel do differently that could cause this remarkable 400 percent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ important middle east country ?
And then Shaw concedes the answer : The banned drug ?
Hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) , used successfully to save tens of thousands of lives wherever doctors are free to prescribe it to patients .
Independent researcher , Elsa Schieder , PhD , who has followed these developments intently told Principia Scientific International : Schieder , like many independent analysts , has been monitoring closely how governments worldwide have been managing their response to the twists and turns of the emerging empirical data and the overall picture shows @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than a holding pattern of lockdowns , social distancing and other restrictive practices until such time as a COVID vaccine is approved and distributed .
The insanity of this approach is exposed by the increasing number of medical professionals who have seen excellent results with hydroxychloroquine , listed by WHO as one of the safest medicines widely available .
But whenever doctors attempt to share their promising findings they are attacked and de-platformed .
It would be logical to immediately try a drug like this on Covid-19 , as there are similar symptoms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ viral “ storm ” which causes severe lung inflammation leading to lung damage .
Schieder points to the exceptional work of such doctors who , in the face of demonization and threats from ‘ the powers that be ’ continue to use HCQ , especially right away , at the first onset of respiratory symptoms when the evidence shows greatest efficacy .
But HCQ is not the only drug showing very good results .
Another safe , long-standing medication is budesonide – an anti-inflammatory used for pneumonia and asthma .
It would be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , proven drug like this on Covid-19 to stem the viral “ storm ” which causes severe lung inflammation leading to lung damage .
Detailed information about this comes from Dr Richard Bartlett , the West Texas doctor who has heralded the effectiveness of budesonide .
In his experience , this drug stops the inflammation from happening .
He sees this treatment as a silver bullet for Covid-19 .
He claims that many patients feel hugely better after even one treatment .
Though Bartlett has suggested his protocol to at least one local @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tried .
Why not ?
The reason given was that there was no proof it would work on hospitalized patients .
Of course , had Dr Bartlett waited for proof , he never would have tried the medication on non-hospitalized people .
In fact , Bartlett has never seen the medicine work so well for anything else : Yet this treatment option – like HCQ – has not been widely tested .
Worse , anything other than a promised ( and expensive ) Big Pharma vaccine is unjustly suppressed or ridiculed .
After @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more frontline doctors are speaking out against the repressive and unscientific approach of policymakers and bureaucrats who , it seems , are hell-bent on only one outcome : a mass mandatory vaccination program rolled out by their friends in Big Pharma .
What could possibly go wrong ?
A comprehensive answer to that question is found in ‘ Murder By Injection ' ( 1988 ) : The Eustace Mullins Warning For Today.
’ About the authors : Elsa Schieder , PhD obtained her PhD in Psychology , Sociology , Cultural Theory from Concordia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Concordia and CEGEP John Abbott College , Montreal .
Now Elsa is Keynote Speaker and Co-Organizer at Essentials of Freedom Convention .
John O ’ SullivanJohn is CEO and co-founder ( with Dr Tim Ball ) of Principia Scientific International ( PSI ) .
John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert , Michael ‘ hockey stick ’ Mann in the ‘ science trial of the century ‘ .
O ’ Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who then collaborated in creating the world ’ s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Israel’s ‘Before & After’ Proves HCQ Beats COVID19
Written by Elsa Schieder PhD & John O'Sullivan
The Times of Israel reveals an astonishing fact that concerns us all in the battle against the current coronavirus pandemic. The respected newspaper points to that nation’s mortality data before and after a change in public policy on the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat the symptoms associated with COVID19. That data may be a bitter pill to swallow for fanatical vaccine manufacturers and promoters.
Times of Israel reporter, Barry Shaw, set the stage thus:
“Israel congratulated itself on coming through the Wuhan virus pandemic with flying colors. By the end of June, with only 300 plus deaths, we were king of the world. We were allowed to go about our normal daily lives. And then we were hit again. Big time. The death rate rocketed to over 1200.”
Shaw then poses the question: what did Israel do differently that could cause this remarkable 400 percent uptick in deaths in this tiny but important middle east country?
And then Shaw concedes the answer:
“Local doctors and clinics are being prevented from prescribing a drug that worked before, but is banned now. The drug that dare not speak its name is hydroxychloroquine. Medical experts are forbidden on social media to mention its name. Some have been fired from their professional for daring to suggest that this drug, in combination with others, has saved countless lives.”
The banned drug? Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), used successfully to save tens of thousands of lives wherever doctors are free to prescribe it to patients. Independent researcher, Elsa Schieder, PhD, who has followed these developments intently told Principia Scientific International:
“The shock and horror isn’t just at the number. It’s at the likely cause. In the first wave, HCQ was readily available. Now it’s banned for early use. Why is Israel, like many other countries, doing this? There is huge evidence for the efficacy of HCQ (plus zinc plus antibiotic) when administered early.”
Schieder, like many independent analysts, has been monitoring closely how governments worldwide have been managing their response to the twists and turns of the emerging empirical data and the overall picture shows a stubborn resistance against implementing anything other than a holding pattern of lockdowns, social distancing and other restrictive practices until such time as a COVID vaccine is approved and distributed.
The insanity of this approach is exposed by the increasing number of medical professionals who have seen excellent results with hydroxychloroquine, listed by WHO as one of the safest medicines widely available. But whenever doctors attempt to share their promising findings they are attacked and de-platformed.
As Schieder adds:
“We saw that about a month ago with the FrontLine Doctors protest when about 600 American doctors, spoke out on this. Their video got 20 million views in two days. Then it was pulled by Youtube and Facebook. The main spokesperson was fired from her two emergency room positions. All for promoting a medication all the doctors found effective.”
It would be logical to immediately try a drug like this on Covid-19, as there are similar symptoms to treat, notably Covid’s viral “storm” which causes severe lung inflammation leading to lung damage.
Schieder points to the exceptional work of such doctors who, in the face of demonization and threats from ‘the powers that be’ continue to use HCQ, especially right away, at the first onset of respiratory symptoms when the evidence shows greatest efficacy. But HCQ is not the only drug showing very good results. Another safe, long-standing medication is budesonide – an anti-inflammatory used for pneumonia and asthma.
It would be logical to immediately try such a safe, proven drug like this on Covid-19 to stem the viral “storm” which causes severe lung inflammation leading to lung damage. Detailed information about this comes from Dr Richard Bartlett, the West Texas doctor who has heralded the effectiveness of budesonide. In his experience, this drug stops the inflammation from happening.
He sees this treatment as a silver bullet for Covid-19. He claims that many patients feel hugely better after even one treatment.
“It’s an inhaled steroid that doesn’t have the side effects of total body steroids but it has the benefits,” he said in an interview. “It’s like putting out a fire at the base of the fire. I’m having patients recover so quickly,” says Bartlett, who has claimed 100 percent success.
Though Bartlett has suggested his protocol to at least one local hospital, the treatment was not even tried. Why not? The reason given was that there was no proof it would work on hospitalized patients. Of course, had Dr Bartlett waited for proof, he never would have tried the medication on non-hospitalized people.
In fact, Bartlett has never seen the medicine work so well for anything else:
“It’s like this medicine was made for this pandemic.”
Yet this treatment option – like HCQ – has not been widely tested. Worse, anything other than a promised (and expensive) Big Pharma vaccine is unjustly suppressed or ridiculed.
After six months of evidence gathering more and more frontline doctors are speaking out against the repressive and unscientific approach of policymakers and bureaucrats who, it seems, are hell-bent on only one outcome: a mass mandatory vaccination program rolled out by their friends in Big Pharma. What could possibly go wrong?
A comprehensive answer to that question is found in ‘Murder By Injection'(1988):The Eustace Mullins Warning For Today.’
About the authors: Elsa Schieder, PhD obtained her PhD in Psychology, Sociology, Cultural Theory from Concordia University and was a full-time professor at Concordia and CEGEP John Abbott College, Montreal. Now Elsa is Keynote Speaker and Co-Organizer at Essentials of Freedom Convention.
John O’SullivanJohn is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI). John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-27--Crony Capitalists Make a Killing on UK Govt COVID Contracts

If you ’ re wondering why your government is keeping the fake pandemic rolling along nicely look no further than those sweet Covid contracts made out to corporate cronies .
Fear , shame , embarrassment : these brakes no longer apply .
The government has discovered that it can bluster through any scandal .
No minister need resign .
No one need apologise .
No one need explain .
As public outrage grows over the billions of pounds of coronavirus contracts issued by the government without competition , it seems determined only to award more of them .
Never mind @ @ @ @ @ @ @ personnel circulate in and out of government , has been strongly criticised for the disastrous system it devised to supply protective equipment to the NHS .
It has now been granted a massive new contract to test the population for Covid-19 .
Never mind that some of these contracts have reportedly cost taxpayers £800 for every protective overall delivered .
Never mind that at least two multi-million pound contracts appear to have been issued to dormant companies .
Awarding contracts to unusual companies , without advertising , transparency or competition now appears to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Several of the firms that have benefited from this largesse are closely linked to senior figures in the government .
Any pretence of fiscal rectitude or democratic accountability has been abandoned .
With four more years and the support of the billionaire press , who cares ?
The way the UK government handles public money looks to me like an open invitation to corruption .
While it is hard to show that any individual deal is corrupt , the framework under which this money is dispensed invites the perception .
When you connect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , people tend to respond with shock and anger .
Corruption , we believe , is something that happens abroad .
Indeed , if you check the rankings published by Transparency International or the Basel Institute , the UK looks like one of the world ’ s cleanest countries .
But this is an artefact of the narrow criteria they use .
As Jason Hickel points out in his book The Divide , theft by officials in poorer nations amounts to between $ 20bn and $ 40bn a year .
It ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ harms wellbeing and democracy in those countries .
But this figure is dwarfed by the illicit flows of money from poor and middling nations that are organised by multinational companies and banks .
The US research group Global Financial Integrity estimates that $ 1.1tn a year flows illegally out of poorer nations , stolen from them through tax evasion and the transfer of money within corporations .
This practice costs sub-Saharan Africa around 6 % of its GDP .
The looters rely on secrecy regimes to process and hide their stolen money .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Tax Justice Network shows that the three countries that have done most to facilitate this theft are the British Virgin Islands , Bermuda and the Cayman Islands .
All of them are British territories .
Jersey , a British dependency , comes seventh on the list .
These places are effectively satellites of the City of London .
But because they are overseas , the City can benefit from “ nefarious activities … while allowing the British government to maintain distance when scandals arise ” , says the network .
The City @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the UK ’ s freedom of information laws creates an extra ring of secrecy .
The UK also appears to be the money-laundering capital of the world .
In a devastating article , Oliver Bullough revealed how easy it has become to hide your stolen loot and fraudulent schemes here , using a giant loophole in company law : no one checks the ownership details you enter when creating your company .
You can , literally , call yourself Mickey Mouse , with a registered address on Mars , and get away with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Companies House site called “ Xxx Stalin ” and “ Mr Mmmmmm Xxxxxxxxxxx ” , whose address was given as “ Mmmmmmm , Mmmmmm , Mmm , MMM ” .
One investigation found that 4,000 company owners , according to their submitted details , were under the age of two .
By giving false identities , company owners in the UK can engage in the industrial processing of dirty money with no fear of getting caught .
Even when the UK ’ s company registration system was revealed as instrumental to the world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Danske Bank scandal , the government turned a blind eye .
A new and terrifying book by the Financial Times journalist Tom Burgis , Kleptopia , follows a global current of dirty money , and the murders and kidnappings required to sustain it .
Again and again , he found , this money , though it might originate in Russia , Africa or the Middle East , travels through London .
The murders and kidnappings don ’ t happen here , of course : our bankers have clean cuffs and manicured nails @ @ @ @ @ @ @ money laundering costs the UK £100bn a year .
But it makes much more .
With the money come people fleeing the consequences of their crimes , welcomed into this country through the government ’ s “ golden visa ” scheme : a red carpet laid out for the very rich .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific @ @

Crony Capitalists Make a Killing on UK Govt COVID Contracts
Written by George Monbiot
If you’re wondering why your government is keeping the fake pandemic rolling along nicely look no further than those sweet Covid contracts made out to corporate cronies.
Fear, shame, embarrassment: these brakes no longer apply. The government has discovered that it can bluster through any scandal. No minister need resign. No one need apologise. No one need explain. As public outrage grows over the billions of pounds of coronavirus contracts issued by the government without competition, it seems determined only to award more of them.
Never mind that the consulting company Deloitte, whose personnel circulate in and out of government, has been strongly criticised for the disastrous system it devised to supply protective equipment to the NHS. It has now been granted a massive new contract to test the population for Covid-19.
Never mind that some of these contracts have reportedly cost taxpayers £800 for every protective overall delivered. Never mind that at least two multi-million pound contracts appear to have been issued to dormant companies. Awarding contracts to unusual companies, without advertising, transparency or competition now appears to have been adopted as the norm. Several of the firms that have benefited from this largesse are closely linked to senior figures in the government.
Any pretence of fiscal rectitude or democratic accountability has been abandoned. With four more years and the support of the billionaire press, who cares?
The way the UK government handles public money looks to me like an open invitation to corruption. While it is hard to show that any individual deal is corrupt, the framework under which this money is dispensed invites the perception.
When you connect the words corruption and the United Kingdom, people tend to respond with shock and anger. Corruption, we believe, is something that happens abroad. Indeed, if you check the rankings published by Transparency International or the Basel Institute, the UK looks like one of the world’s cleanest countries. But this is an artefact of the narrow criteria they use.
As Jason Hickel points out in his book The Divide, theft by officials in poorer nations amounts to between $20bn and $40bn a year. It’s a lot of money, and it harms wellbeing and democracy in those countries. But this figure is dwarfed by the illicit flows of money from poor and middling nations that are organised by multinational companies and banks. The US research group Global Financial Integrity estimates that $1.1tn a year flows illegally out of poorer nations, stolen from them through tax evasion and the transfer of money within corporations. This practice costs sub-Saharan Africa around 6% of its GDP.
The looters rely on secrecy regimes to process and hide their stolen money. The corporate tax haven index published by the Tax Justice Network shows that the three countries that have done most to facilitate this theft are the British Virgin Islands, Bermuda and the Cayman Islands. All of them are British territories. Jersey, a British dependency, comes seventh on the list. These places are effectively satellites of the City of London. But because they are overseas, the City can benefit from “nefarious activities … while allowing the British government to maintain distance when scandals arise”, says the network. The City of London’s astonishing exemption from the UK’s freedom of information laws creates an extra ring of secrecy.
The UK also appears to be the money-laundering capital of the world. In a devastating article, Oliver Bullough revealed how easy it has become to hide your stolen loot and fraudulent schemes here, using a giant loophole in company law: no one checks the ownership details you enter when creating your company. You can, literally, call yourself Mickey Mouse, with a registered address on Mars, and get away with it. Bullough discovered owners on the Companies House site called “Xxx Stalin” and “Mr Mmmmmm Xxxxxxxxxxx”, whose address was given as “Mmmmmmm, Mmmmmm, Mmm, MMM”. One investigation found that 4,000 company owners, according to their submitted details, were under the age of two.
By giving false identities, company owners in the UK can engage in the industrial processing of dirty money with no fear of getting caught. Even when the UK’s company registration system was revealed as instrumental to the world’s biggest known money-laundering scheme, the Danske Bank scandal, the government turned a blind eye.
A new and terrifying book by the Financial Times journalist Tom Burgis, Kleptopia, follows a global current of dirty money, and the murders and kidnappings required to sustain it. Again and again, he found, this money, though it might originate in Russia, Africa or the Middle East, travels through London. The murders and kidnappings don’t happen here, of course: our bankers have clean cuffs and manicured nails. The National Crime Agency estimates that money laundering costs the UK £100bn a year. But it makes much more. With the money come people fleeing the consequences of their crimes, welcomed into this country through the government’s “golden visa” scheme: a red carpet laid out for the very rich.
Read the full article at www.theguardian.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-27--Top UK Industry Scientist Slams Government’s COVID19 Test Scam

In a damning talkRADIO interview the former scientific advisor at Pfizer , Dr Mike Yeadon , has reissued his challenge to the UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock ( photo , above ) regarding official coronavirus testing policy .
Speaking with Julia Hartley-Brewer , Dr Yeadon said the Government are “ using a test with an undeclared false positive rate.
” “ That ’ s dreadful .
If you don ’ t know what it is – shame on you , ” he added .
Dr Mike Yeadon wants those who have tested positive for coronavirus to be tested again to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a false positive .
But lockdown zealots in government , like the UK Health Secretary , refuse to reveal the official rate of false positives because if it were to become widely known there would be outrage .
But when the truth is finally revealed , anyone could discern we have long passed the point for any need of more emergency measures .
Such draconian lockdown policies implemented in major nations worldwide have inflicted a yet untold mountain of damage , all due to the widespread over-reaction of world leaders to the fake @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , more eminent scientists and doctors speak out against the appalling lockdown measures which profit the very rich and do irreparable harm to the less fortunate .
Dr Yeadon affirms what many articles posted at Principia Scientific International have shown ( e.g.here , here , here ) , that this political obsession with testing is driving up the high numbers of ‘ false positives ’ and creating a sham scenario of a surge in people supposedly infected .
The message needs sharing to widest possible audience : the PCR tests relied on by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the COVID19 virus are not fit for purpose .
This test was invented by Nobel Prize winner Dr Kary Mullis who emphatically stated they WERE NOT to be used for medical diagnostic testing .
The PCR test DOES NOT detect viruses , it simply picks up fragments of DNA and RNA which may well be remnants of a common cold someone had weeks or months earlier .
That politicians persist in using these ridiculous tests , despite the evidence presented by eminent experts such as Dr Yeadon , adds further weight to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and should be swiftly removed from office to face criminal prosecution .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Top UK Industry Scientist Slams Government’s COVID19 Test Scam
Written by John O'Sullivan
In a damning talkRADIO interview the former scientific advisor at Pfizer, Dr Mike Yeadon, has reissued his challenge to the UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock (photo, above) regarding official coronavirus testing policy. Speaking with Julia Hartley-Brewer, Dr Yeadon said the Government are “using a test with an undeclared false positive rate.”
“That’s dreadful. If you don’t know what it is – shame on you,” he added.
Dr Mike Yeadon wants those who have tested positive for coronavirus to be tested again to eliminate the possibility of the test being a false positive.
But lockdown zealots in government, like the UK Health Secretary, refuse to reveal the official rate of false positives because if it were to become widely known there would be outrage.
But when the truth is finally revealed, anyone could discern we have long passed the point for any need of more emergency measures. Such draconian lockdown policies implemented in major nations worldwide have inflicted a yet untold mountain of damage, all due to the widespread over-reaction of world leaders to the fake COVID19 pandemic.
As each week passes, more eminent scientists and doctors speak out against the appalling lockdown measures which profit the very rich and do irreparable harm to the less fortunate.
Dr Yeadon affirms what many articles posted at Principia Scientific International have shown (e.g.here, here, here), that this political obsession with testing is driving up the high numbers of ‘false positives’ and creating a sham scenario of a surge in people supposedly infected.
Watch the video here:
The message needs sharing to widest possible audience: the PCR tests relied on by governments all round the world for detecting the COVID19 virus are not fit for purpose. This test was invented by Nobel Prize winner Dr Kary Mullis who emphatically stated they WERE NOT to be used for medical diagnostic testing.
The PCR test DOES NOT detect viruses, it simply picks up fragments of DNA and RNA which may well be remnants of a common cold someone had weeks or months earlier. That politicians persist in using these ridiculous tests, despite the evidence presented by eminent experts such as Dr Yeadon, adds further weight to the growing argument that our leaders are corrupt and should be swiftly removed from office to face criminal prosecution.
Follow talkRADIO on youtube
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-28--The ‘New Normal’ is a Rehash of Last Century’s Totalitarianism

The ‘ New Normal ’ is a Rehash of Last Century ’ s Totalitarianism The Economist just ran a story that summarized the change in work that “ people particularly fond of their pyjamas [ sic ] have for decades been arguing that a lot of work done in large shared offices could better be done at home .
With covid-19 their ideas were put to the test in a huge if not randomized trial .
The preliminary results are now in : yes , a lot of work can be done at home ; and what is more , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there.
” The collapse in security in major cities such as New York have led to only 54 % of companies expecting to return to New York City .
In fact , only 8 % of employees have returned to the office as of mid-August .
Based upon a very RELIABLE source , the violence in the cities has been encouraged by Democrats for more than just trying to overthrow Trump .
This has also been part of the agenda to end commuting by car to reduce CO2 .
They have deliberately sought @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The problem has been that these Democratic mayors are ignorant of the real objective and think they are helping to just overthrow Trump .
What they have failed to see is the bigger picture .
People are fleeing the big cities and moving out to the suburbs .
Real estate in the suburbs has risen in price while city properties are collapsing with no-bid .
The editor of the London Financial Times sent out this letter : “ It has been just over six months since London went into lockdown and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , crowded office to a dispersed , digital workplace .
The Covid-19 pandemic has been an unparalleled test for organisations and governments around the world — and to all of us as parents , colleagues and friends .
I hope the FT has passed this test by delivering the news , insight , analysis and intellectual stimulation you need to navigate this fast-changing world .
Looking ahead to the coming months , the FT aims to be your trusted guide to the new normal .
We have passed through the first wave of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ face the new reality of living with the virus .
Local and national outbreaks will continue to disrupt the fragile economic recovery .
Crucial policy decisions on travel , employment support and stimulus occur with dizzying speed.
” Indeed , the New Norm is intended to bring in the Great Reset whereby offices vanish , commuting comes to an end , and travel will be forever restricted .
However , vital to pulling this off is continued social distancing and masks .
Why ?
This is being employed to combat civil unrest .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ mindless sheep who obey whatever the government , says which complies with Stanley Milgram ’ s studies on Obedience to Authority .
The Germans put on trial after World War II said that they were just following orders .
This inspired Milgram to investigate because many argued that the Germans were just different and could kill the Jews without remorse .
At the Nuremberg Trials , those Germans simply said they were just following orders .
Stanley was perhaps the most important psychologists of all time as far as I am concerned .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Stanley actually investigates and arrived at a conclusion nobody suspected was even possible .
He hired actors to pretend to be shocked by a person whenever they lied .
Stanley took random people off the street in the United States and elsewhere to see if the Germans were really a different species .
He discovered that people would shock others in a torture setting as long as they were told that was what they had to do .
Stanley concluded his studies which shocked the world .
They were published in his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I bring this up now BECAUSE this is precisely what is being carried out today .
We have people wearing masks when there is no serious pandemic and yelling at others who do not .
Some are violently attacking people who do not have a mask .
What is being carried out is a well-defined psychological tactic because they instill fear in the mass herd of human sheep and then they count on the obedience of authority to control society .
I have stated before , a friend of mine grew up behind @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fell , his father went an got his Stasi file .
He was shocked to discover everyone he thought was a friend was telling the government everything he had to say against the government .
When he came home , my friend thought his father went mad .
He began punching holes in the walls and ripping out microphones .
Until his death , he refused to ever speak to anyone outside his immediate family .
This is the reasoning being the social distancing and wearing masks .
This ( 1 ) provides @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gather together to resist , and ( 2 ) as in France , they can put you in prison for 6 months for not wearing a mask or in Melbourne , Australia , attacking even women on the street who do not have a mask on .
This is raw tyranny and how they are deliberately seeking to breakdown society to make the population controllable as was the case under communism .
“ Why , of course , the people don ’ t want war .
Why would some poor slob on a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece .
Naturally , the common people don ’ t want war ; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America , nor for that matter in Germany .
That is understood .
But , after all , it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along , whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
With respect to a Democracy they argued , the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives , and in the United States , only Congress can declare wars .
Göring replied : “ Oh , that is all well and good , but , voice or no voice , the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders .
That is easy .
All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the same way in any country.
” Welcome to the New Norm .
These things are well defined .
Once you understand what can be accomplished , then you can see their strategic plan .
Since 1992 , countries have signed on to Agenda 21 with the United States to inventory everything in the world along with the population .
You MUST understand that there is this idea of a one-world government that would prevent wars .
Here you have the former French Prime Minister bolding explaining this very idea was behind creating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do this globally and they have made their move here in 2020 .
This is not a conspiracy theory .
I disagree that they will ever be able to pull it off .
That does not mean those in power will not try .
Gates has been feeding into this agenda and seeks to push for digital currency so the tech companies will get a piece of every transaction in the world .
He then is involved in food production and vaccines under the pretence of helping people when he is afraid of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ freedom if any remains .
It will be more likely that you will need a permit to have a child , as was the case with the one-child rule in China that failed .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

The ‘New Normal’ is a Rehash of Last Century’s Totalitarianism
Written by Martin Armstrong
The Economist just ran a story that summarized the change in work that “people particularly fond of their pyjamas [sic] have for decades been arguing that a lot of work done in large shared offices could better be done at home. With covid-19 their ideas were put to the test in a huge if not randomized trial.
The preliminary results are now in: yes, a lot of work can be done at home; and what is more, many people seem to prefer doing it there.”
The collapse in security in major cities such as New York have led to only 54% of companies expecting to return to New York City. In fact, only 8% of employees have returned to the office as of mid-August. Based upon a very RELIABLE source, the violence in the cities has been encouraged by Democrats for more than just trying to overthrow Trump. This has also been part of the agenda to end commuting by car to reduce CO2.
They have deliberately sought to end commuting to save the planet. The problem has been that these Democratic mayors are ignorant of the real objective and think they are helping to just overthrow Trump. What they have failed to see is the bigger picture. People are fleeing the big cities and moving out to the suburbs. Real estate in the suburbs has risen in price while city properties are collapsing with no-bid.
According to the FT, Covid19 has given the world 3 years more oil supply
The editor of the London Financial Times sent out this letter:
“It has been just over six months since London went into lockdown and the FT newsroom changed overnight from a bustling, crowded office to a dispersed, digital workplace. The Covid-19 pandemic has been an unparalleled test for organisations and governments around the world — and to all of us as parents, colleagues and friends. I hope the FT has passed this test by delivering the news, insight, analysis and intellectual stimulation you need to navigate this fast-changing world.
…
Looking ahead to the coming months, the FT aims to be your trusted guide to the new normal. We have passed through the first wave of the global crisis. Now, we face the new reality of living with the virus. Local and national outbreaks will continue to disrupt the fragile economic recovery. Crucial policy decisions on travel, employment support and stimulus occur with dizzying speed.”
Indeed, the New Norm is intended to bring in the Great Reset whereby offices vanish, commuting comes to an end, and travel will be forever restricted. However, vital to pulling this off is continued social distancing and masks. Why? This is being employed to combat civil unrest. It is also intended to separate the mindless sheep who obey whatever the government, says which complies with Stanley Milgram’s studies on Obedience to Authority.
The Germans put on trial after World War II said that they were just following orders. This inspired Milgram to investigate because many argued that the Germans were just different and could kill the Jews without remorse. At the Nuremberg Trials, those Germans simply said they were just following orders.
Stanley was perhaps the most important psychologists of all time as far as I am concerned. Instead of coming up with a theory, Stanley actually investigates and arrived at a conclusion nobody suspected was even possible. He hired actors to pretend to be shocked by a person whenever they lied. Stanley took random people off the street in the United States and elsewhere to see if the Germans were really a different species. He discovered that people would shock others in a torture setting as long as they were told that was what they had to do.
Stanley concluded his studies which shocked the world. They were published in his book – “Obedience to Authority.” I bring this up now BECAUSE this is precisely what is being carried out today. We have people wearing masks when there is no serious pandemic and yelling at others who do not. Some are violently attacking people who do not have a mask.
What is being carried out is a well-defined psychological tactic because they instill fear in the mass herd of human sheep and then they count on the obedience of authority to control society. I have stated before, a friend of mine grew up behind the Berlin Wall. When the wall fell, his father went an got his Stasi file. He was shocked to discover everyone he thought was a friend was telling the government everything he had to say against the government. When he came home, my friend thought his father went mad. He began punching holes in the walls and ripping out microphones. Until his death, he refused to ever speak to anyone outside his immediate family.
This is the reasoning being the social distancing and wearing masks. This (1) provides justification to arrest people who try to gather together to resist, and (2) as in France, they can put you in prison for 6 months for not wearing a mask or in Melbourne, Australia, attacking even women on the street who do not have a mask on. This is raw tyranny and how they are deliberately seeking to breakdown society to make the population controllable as was the case under communism.
Field Marshall Hermann Wilhelm Göring (1893–1946)
“Why, of course, the people don’t want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood.
But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.
With respect to a Democracy they argued, the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States, only Congress can declare wars.
Göring replied: “Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”
Welcome to the New Norm. These things are well defined. Once you understand what can be accomplished, then you can see their strategic plan. Since 1992, countries have signed on to Agenda 21 with the United States to inventory everything in the world along with the population.
You MUST understand that there is this idea of a one-world government that would prevent wars. Here you have the former French Prime Minister bolding explaining this very idea was behind creating the Eurozone. They are seeking to do this globally and they have made their move here in 2020.
This is not a conspiracy theory. I disagree that they will ever be able to pull it off. That does not mean those in power will not try.
Gates has been feeding into this agenda and seeks to push for digital currency so the tech companies will get a piece of every transaction in the world. He then is involved in food production and vaccines under the pretence of helping people when he is afraid of over-population.
The NEW NORM is less freedom if any remains. It will be more likely that you will need a permit to have a child, as was the case with the one-child rule in China that failed.
Read more at www.armstrongeconomics.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-28--COVID1984: Thousands Attend London’s ‘We Do Not Consent’ Rally

Six months after parliament passed the Coronavirus Act 2020 , which gives the government powers to impose lockdowns and other restrictive social distancing measures ( measures that have been accompanied by stiff fines ) , thousands of Britons packed London ’ s Trafalgar Square bearing signs reading “ We Do Not Consent ” and “ Think Before It ’ s Illegal ” during a rally that was billed as a “ We Do Not Consent ” anti-lockdown demonstration .
The event was organized by a coalition of political groups , and supporters have been galvanized by the talk of another @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as well as PM Boris Johnson ’ s assurances that a lockdown would be imposed if the government felt all other measures had failed .
Protests are exempt from the rule of six , a rule that threatens fines for groups of more than six people , which has created much aggravation in the UK .
Organizers of the rally had to submit a “ risk assessment ” and agree to comply with social distancing rules .
While police told the press that the organizers had completed these requirements , the metropolitan police @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wearing masks and violating other rules .
They added that enforcement “ remains a last resort but will be undertaken if required.
” Demonstrators waved signs and British flags and cheered as speakers – including several notable “ conspiracy theories ” , according to the Guardian – addressed the crowd .
Crowds chanted “ freedom ” as people whistled and clapped .
At points , police fulfilled their promise to break up crowds .
Before they began , the protests received a warning from the Metropolitan Police , which said it would intervene @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by social distancing guidelines .
Toby Young , General Secretary of the Free Speech Union , expressed hope that law enforcement would allow the group to protest “ as they did with [ Extinction Rebellion ] and BLM.
” Attending the protest , Kerry Dunn , 41 , from Bath , claimed her son , Beau , suffered adverse affects after being vaccinated .
Another event , billed as a “ People ’ s network and family picnic ” , is also being organised by the same activists for Sunday in Hyde Park @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

COVID1984: Thousands Attend London’s ‘We Do Not Consent’ Rally
Written by Tyler Durden
Six months after parliament passed the Coronavirus Act 2020, which gives the government powers to impose lockdowns and other restrictive social distancing measures (measures that have been accompanied by stiff fines), thousands of Britons packed London’s Trafalgar Square bearing signs reading “We Do Not Consent” and “Think Before It’s Illegal” during a rally that was billed as a “We Do Not Consent” anti-lockdown demonstration.
The event was organized by a coalition of political groups, and supporters have been galvanized by the talk of another London lockdown by mayor Sadiq Khan, as well as PM Boris Johnson’s assurances that a lockdown would be imposed if the government felt all other measures had failed.
Protests are exempt from the rule of six, a rule that threatens fines for groups of more than six people, which has created much aggravation in the UK. Organizers of the rally had to submit a “risk assessment” and agree to comply with social distancing rules. While police told the press that the organizers had completed these requirements, the metropolitan police promised to crack down on those not wearing masks and violating other rules.
They added that enforcement “remains a last resort but will be undertaken if required.”
Demonstrators waved signs and British flags and cheered as speakers – including several notable “conspiracy theories”, according to the Guardian – addressed the crowd. Crowds chanted “freedom” as people whistled and clapped.
At points, police fulfilled their promise to break up crowds. Before they began, the protests received a warning from the Metropolitan Police, which said it would intervene if the protesters don’t abide by social distancing guidelines.
Toby Young, General Secretary of the Free Speech Union, expressed hope that law enforcement would allow the group to protest “as they did with [Extinction Rebellion] and BLM.”
Attending the protest, Kerry Dunn, 41, from Bath, claimed her son, Beau, suffered adverse affects after being vaccinated.
“I’ve been shouting that mandatory vaccines are coming, no one believed me,” she said. “Now we can see it’s just around the corner, we’ve never been closer.”
Another event, billed as a “People’s network and family picnic”, is also being organised by the same activists for Sunday in Hyde Park.
Read more at www.zerohedge.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-28--Massive Diesel Engines Prop Up Australia’s Green Energy Fiasco

How does Australia deal with the terrible and chaotic wind and solar power intermittency problem in its electric grid ?
How about with massive diesel engines used to power large ships ?
?
Sound crazy ?
Not in Australia .
If a country is going to ramp up power generation with insanely erratic wind and solar power , then we shouldn ’ t be surprised to see these enormous diesel ship engines used to try and fix the problem .
Thus , if we have stupid solutions then we must use stupid bandaids .
Again , the insanity continues .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ brief article goes to StopTheseThings.com , which focuses on the problems associated with wind and solar power generation .
The article , Ships Ahoy !
Giant Diesel-Fuelled Ship Engines ‘ Solution ’ For Australia ’ s Renewable Energy Crisis , provided me a few good laughs and the desire to share it on the SRSroccoReport.com .
Notice the two workers next to the engine ?
That should give you an idea of the size of this beast .
According to the article linked above , AGL Energy Limited has installed 12 of these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Torres Island , Australia .
The total output from these dozen ship engines is rated at 210 MW ( MegaWatts ) .
Here ’ s another picture of Wartsila ’ s 50DF Diesel Ship Engine at the factory plant .
These Wartsila engines can run on diesel , natural gas , and bunker oil .
Can you imagine how much fuel a dozen of these engines consume to balance the power lost from wind and solar generation ?
?
If you read the article linked above , which I highly recommend , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ see drops of 3,000 MWs !
!
What is the purpose of these new dozen Wartsila 50DF Diesel Engines ?
The following article from the Financial Review , AGL flicks switch on SA gas power in time for summer , quoted below : The addition of the 210-megawatt generator is expected to beef up security of electricity supply in the fragile South Australian market , which is largely reliant on weather-dependent renewables and imports from other states to meet demand .
The addition of the 210-megawatt generator is expected to BEEF UP security @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Australian market ?
?
The South Australian energy market wasn ’ t fragile until wind , and solar power generation was ramped up .
Now , I am not blaming the problem on the Wartsila Diesel Engine .
It is an excellent engine if you want to power a large ship , but it ’ s not a wise long-term solution for balancing wind and solar power Furthermore , with the ramping up the supposedly renewable wind and solar power , Southern Australia has one of the highest electricity prices in the world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gold Member article .
Lastly , it is simply amazing how intelligent people are making extremely stupid decisions regarding future energy supply .
If we continue to increase wind and solar power generation globally , it will only make the coming ENERGY CLIFF impact much worse than if we remained on fossil fuels alone .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To @ @ @ @ @

Massive Diesel Engines Prop Up Australia’s Green Energy Fiasco
Written by srsroccoreport.com
How does Australia deal with the terrible and chaotic wind and solar power intermittency problem in its electric grid? How about with massive diesel engines used to power large ships?? Sound crazy? Not in Australia.
If a country is going to ramp up power generation with insanely erratic wind and solar power, then we shouldn’t be surprised to see these enormous diesel ship engines used to try and fix the problem.
Thus, if we have stupid solutions then we must use stupid bandaids. Again, the insanity continues.
The credit for the information in this brief article goes to StopTheseThings.com, which focuses on the problems associated with wind and solar power generation. The article, Ships Ahoy! Giant Diesel-Fuelled Ship Engines ‘Solution’ For Australia’s Renewable Energy Crisis, provided me a few good laughs and the desire to share it on the SRSroccoReport.com.
Notice the two workers next to the engine? That should give you an idea of the size of this beast. According to the article linked above, AGL Energy Limited has installed 12 of these engines at the Barker Inlet Power Station in Torres Island, Australia. The total output from these dozen ship engines is rated at 210 MW (MegaWatts).
Here’s another picture of Wartsila’s 50DF Diesel Ship Engine at the factory plant.
These Wartsila engines can run on diesel, natural gas, and bunker oil. Can you imagine how much fuel a dozen of these engines consume to balance the power lost from wind and solar generation?? If you read the article linked above, which I highly recommend, wind power generated in Southern Australia can see drops of 3,000 MWs!!
What is the purpose of these new dozen Wartsila 50DF Diesel Engines? The following article from the Financial Review, AGL flicks switch on SA gas power in time for summer, quoted below:
The addition of the 210-megawatt generator is expected to beef up security of electricity supply in the fragile South Australian market, which is largely reliant on weather-dependent renewables and imports from other states to meet demand.
The addition of the 210-megawatt generator is expected to BEEF UP security of electricity supply in the fragile South Australian market?? The South Australian energy market wasn’t fragile until wind, and solar power generation was ramped up. Now, I am not blaming the problem on the Wartsila Diesel Engine. It is an excellent engine if you want to power a large ship, but it’s not a wise long-term solution for balancing wind and solar power
Furthermore, with the ramping up the supposedly renewable wind and solar power, Southern Australia has one of the highest electricity prices in the world. More on this in detailed upcoming Gold Member article.
Lastly, it is simply amazing how intelligent people are making extremely stupid decisions regarding future energy supply. If we continue to increase wind and solar power generation globally, it will only make the coming ENERGY CLIFF impact much worse than if we remained on fossil fuels alone.
Read more at srsroccoreport.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-28--New Study Finds Global Warming Hiatus Was Real

A new analysis of global air temperature by researchers from Tongji University in Shanghai has cast light on the much-debated recent hiatus in global temperature .
Writing in the Journal of Earth Science , the Chinese scientists say there was a rapid rise in global mean surface air temperature after the late 1970s but that this stalled , and there were a relative stagnation and even slight cooling that lasted for about 15 years ( 1998–2012 ) .
They add that even though the slowdown was acknowledged by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report ( IPCC AR5 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ IPCC , 2013 ) , there was a debate in the scientific community about whether there was a hiatus in global warming or not .
The researchers believe that the debate about the global-warming hiatus poses a substantial challenge to our understanding of the global climate response to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and natural variability .
They say that the disagreements about the recent global-warming hiatus mainly arise from different sources , among which differences across observational SAT datasets may be a key contributor to the contradictory conclusions .
So they use an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the ratio of two oxygen isotopes in precipitation , oxygen 16 and 18 , which is a proxy for the temperature of precipitation and surface temperature .
They are particularly interested in what they term a “ robust correlation ” between precipitation oxygen ratios and surface temperature over mid- and high-latitude regions .
Twelve stations were selected of which ten are located in Europe , and the remaining two in Antarctica and North America , respectively .
Using the data they constructed a composite isotope index spanning 1970–2016 by combining twelve precipitation oxygen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ continents .
With it , they evaluate the recent global-warming hiatus .
They found a cooling trend over the period 1998–2012 which was significantly different from that of the interval 1970–1997 which is characterized by significant warming .
They conclude that , PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

New Study Finds Global Warming Hiatus Was Real
Written by Dr David Whitehouse
A new analysis of global air temperature by researchers from Tongji University in Shanghai has cast light on the much-debated recent hiatus in global temperature.
Writing in the Journal of Earth Science, the Chinese scientists say there was a rapid rise in global mean surface air temperature after the late 1970s but that this stalled, and there were a relative stagnation and even slight cooling that lasted for about 15 years (1998–2012).
They add that even though the slowdown was acknowledged by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report (IPCC AR5) and termed as a hiatus (IPCC, 2013), there was a debate in the scientific community about whether there was a hiatus in global warming or not.
The researchers believe that the debate about the global-warming hiatus poses a substantial challenge to our understanding of the global climate response to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and natural variability.
They say that the disagreements about the recent global-warming hiatus mainly arise from different sources, among which differences across observational SAT datasets may be a key contributor to the contradictory conclusions. So they use an alternative set of data.
They use the ratio of two oxygen isotopes in precipitation, oxygen 16 and 18, which is a proxy for the temperature of precipitation and surface temperature.
They are particularly interested in what they term a “robust correlation” between precipitation oxygen ratios and surface temperature over mid- and high-latitude regions.
Twelve stations were selected of which ten are located in Europe, and the remaining two in Antarctica and North America, respectively.
Using the data they constructed a composite isotope index spanning 1970–2016 by combining twelve precipitation oxygen isotope records collected over mid and high-latitude continents. With it, they evaluate the recent global-warming hiatus.
They found a cooling trend over the period 1998–2012 which was significantly different from that of the interval 1970–1997 which is characterized by significant warming. They conclude that,
…our results provide new evidence for recent global warming hiatus and highlight the potential of utilising precipitation isotopes for tracking climate changes.”
Read more at GWPF
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-28--New Study: Honeybee Shows Venom ‘Rapidly Destroys’ Cancer Cells

Honeybees have long provided humans with vital tools for our survival like the pollination of fruits and vegetables as well as honey which has medicinal and antibiotic properties .
A new study published this month in the journal npj Precision Oncology reveals that the role of honeybees in helping humans may have just taken a massive live-saving step forward .
The results of the study , titled Honeybee venom and melittin suppress growth factor receptor activation in HER2-enriched and triple-negative breast cancer , showed that honeybee venom rapidly destroyed triple-negative breast cancer and HER2-enriched breast cancer cells .
Lead researcher @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Perkins Institute of Medical Research and The University of Western Australia , tested the effect of the honeybee venom on the clinical subtypes of breast cancer and their results were promising , to say the least .
In an interview with Science Daily , Duffy said the aim of the research was to investigate the anti-cancer properties of honeybee venom , and a component compound , melittin , on different types of breast cancer cells .
“ No-one had previously compared the effects of honeybee venom or melittin across all of the different @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ We tested honeybee venom on normal breast cells , and cells from the clinical subtypes of breast cancer : hormone receptor positive , HER2-enriched , and triple-negative breast cancer .
“ We tested a very small , positively charged peptide in honeybee venom called melittin , which we could reproduce synthetically , and found that the synthetic product mirrored the majority of the anti-cancer effects of honeybee venom , ” Dr Duffy said .
Incredibly , the specific concentration of honeybee venom can induce 100 % cancer cell death , all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Researchers demonstrated that the melittin works in two ways : Within an hour of administration , it effectively punches holes in the cell membrane , killing the cell .
In addition however , within 20 minutes of administration , it rapidly disrupts the cancer signaling pathways , shutting down the chemical messages needed for cancer cell growth and reproduction .
Researchers found that honeybee venom was particularly effective in combination therapy , such as chemotherapy .
Though the researchers urge more study is warranted , they note that this study shows major @ @ @ @ @ @ @ invasive cancers using the naturally derived venom of a honeybee .
The researchers noted that honeybee venom is available globally and , if preliminary results are confirmed , may offer cost-effective and accessible treatment options for lower socioeconomic populations in remote areas of the world .
They concluded that their results “ could be leveraged to aid the development of new therapeutic modalities for many cancer types associated with frequent drug resistance and poor prognosis.
” PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

New Study: Honeybee Shows Venom ‘Rapidly Destroys’ Cancer Cells
Written by Matt Agorist
Honeybees have long provided humans with vital tools for our survival like the pollination of fruits and vegetables as well as honey which has medicinal and antibiotic properties. A new study published this month in the journal npj Precision Oncology reveals that the role of honeybees in helping humans may have just taken a massive live-saving step forward.
The results of the study, titled Honeybee venom and melittin suppress growth factor receptor activation in HER2-enriched and triple-negative breast cancer, showed that honeybee venom rapidly destroyed triple-negative breast cancer and HER2-enriched breast cancer cells.
Lead researcher, Dr Ciara Duffy from the Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research and The University of Western Australia, tested the effect of the honeybee venom on the clinical subtypes of breast cancer and their results were promising, to say the least.
In an interview with Science Daily, Duffy said the aim of the research was to investigate the anti-cancer properties of honeybee venom, and a component compound, melittin, on different types of breast cancer cells.
“No-one had previously compared the effects of honeybee venom or melittin across all of the different subtypes of breast cancer and normal cells. “We tested honeybee venom on normal breast cells, and cells from the clinical subtypes of breast cancer: hormone receptor positive, HER2-enriched, and triple-negative breast cancer. “We tested a very small, positively charged peptide in honeybee venom called melittin, which we could reproduce synthetically, and found that the synthetic product mirrored the majority of the anti-cancer effects of honeybee venom,” Dr Duffy said.
“We found both honeybee venom and melittin significantly, selectively and rapidly reduced the viability of triple-negative breast cancer and HER2-enriched breast cancer cells. “The venom was extremely potent,” Dr Duffy said.
Incredibly, the specific concentration of honeybee venom can induce 100% cancer cell death, all the while leaving regular cells mostly unharmed.
Researchers demonstrated that the melittin works in two ways: Within an hour of administration, it effectively punches holes in the cell membrane, killing the cell. In addition however, within 20 minutes of administration, it rapidly disrupts the cancer signaling pathways, shutting down the chemical messages needed for cancer cell growth and reproduction.
“We found that melittin can completely destroy cancer cell membranes within 60 minutes,” the study notes.
According to Dr. Duffy,
“We looked at how honeybee venom and melittin affect the cancer signaling pathways, the chemical messages that are fundamental for cancer cell growth and reproduction, and we found that very quickly these signaling pathways were shut down.”
Researchers found that honeybee venom was particularly effective in combination therapy, such as chemotherapy. Though the researchers urge more study is warranted, they note that this study shows major promise for the treatment of common and invasive cancers using the naturally derived venom of a honeybee.
“We found that melittin can be used with small molecules or chemotherapies, such as docetaxel, to treat highly-aggressive types of breast cancer. The combination of melittin and docetaxel was extremely efficient in reducing tumour growth in mice,” Duffy said.
The researchers noted that honeybee venom is available globally and, if preliminary results are confirmed, may offer cost-effective and accessible treatment options for lower socioeconomic populations in remote areas of the world. They concluded that their results “could be leveraged to aid the development of new therapeutic modalities for many cancer types associated with frequent drug resistance and poor prognosis.”
Great news indeed.
Read more at thefreethoughtproject.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-29--New Study: Bad News, Lunar Surface Radiation Higher Than Hoped

As the US prepares to return humans to the Moon this decade , one of the biggest dangers future astronauts will face is space radiation that can cause lasting health effects , from cataracts to cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. Though the Apollo missions of the 1960s and 1970s proved it was safe for people to spend a few days on the lunar surface , NASA did not take daily radiation measurements that would help scientists quantify just how long crews could stay .
This question was resolved Friday after a Chinese-German team published in the journal Science Advances the results @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s Chang ’ E 4 lander in 2019 .
“ The radiation of the Moon is between two and three times higher than what you have on the ISS ( International Space Station ) , ” co-author Robert Wimmer-Schweingruber , an astrophysicist at the University of Kiel told AFP .
“ So that limits your stay to approximately two months on the surface of the Moon , ” he added , once the radiation exposure from the roughly week-long journey there , and week back , is taken into account. There are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cosmic rays , sporadic solar particle events ( for example from solar flares ) , and neutrons and gamma rays from interactions between space radiation and the lunar soil .
Radiation is measured using the unit sievert , which quantifies the amount absorbed by human tissues .
The team found that the radiation exposure on the Moon is 1,369 microsieverts per day – about 2.6 times higher than the International Space Station crew ’ s daily dose .
The reason for this is that the ISS is still partly shielded by the Earth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the magnetosphere , which deflects most radiation from space .
Earth ’ s atmosphere provides additional protection for humans on the surface , but we are more exposed the higher up we go. “ The radiation levels we measured on the Moon are about 200 times higher than on the surface of the Earth and five to 10 times higher than on a flight from New York to Frankfurt , ” added Wimmer-Schweingruber. NASA is planning to bring humans to the Moon by 2024 under the Artemis mission and has said it has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would include astronauts working and living on the surface .
For Wimmer-Schweingruber there is one work-around if we want humans to spend more than two or three months : build habitats that are shielded from radiation by coating them with 80 centimeters ( 30 inches ) of lunar soil .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

New Study: Bad News, Lunar Surface Radiation Higher Than Hoped
Written by www.sciencealert.com
As the US prepares to return humans to the Moon this decade, one of the biggest dangers future astronauts will face is space radiation that can cause lasting health effects, from cataracts to cancer and neurodegenerative diseases.
Though the Apollo missions of the 1960s and 1970s proved it was safe for people to spend a few days on the lunar surface, NASA did not take daily radiation measurements that would help scientists quantify just how long crews could stay.
This question was resolved Friday after a Chinese-German team published in the journal Science Advances the results of an experiment carried out by China’s Chang’E 4 lander in 2019.
“The radiation of the Moon is between two and three times higher than what you have on the ISS (International Space Station),” co-author Robert Wimmer-Schweingruber, an astrophysicist at the University of Kiel told AFP.
“So that limits your stay to approximately two months on the surface of the Moon,” he added, once the radiation exposure from the roughly week-long journey there, and week back, is taken into account.
There are several sources of radiation exposure: galactic cosmic rays, sporadic solar particle events (for example from solar flares), and neutrons and gamma rays from interactions between space radiation and the lunar soil.
Radiation is measured using the unit sievert, which quantifies the amount absorbed by human tissues.
The team found that the radiation exposure on the Moon is 1,369 microsieverts per day – about 2.6 times higher than the International Space Station crew’s daily dose.
The reason for this is that the ISS is still partly shielded by the Earth’s protective magnetic bubble, called the magnetosphere, which deflects most radiation from space.
Earth’s atmosphere provides additional protection for humans on the surface, but we are more exposed the higher up we go.
“The radiation levels we measured on the Moon are about 200 times higher than on the surface of the Earth and five to 10 times higher than on a flight from New York to Frankfurt,” added Wimmer-Schweingruber.
NASA is planning to bring humans to the Moon by 2024 under the Artemis mission and has said it has plans for a long term presence that would include astronauts working and living on the surface.
For Wimmer-Schweingruber there is one work-around if we want humans to spend more than two or three months: build habitats that are shielded from radiation by coating them with 80 centimeters (30 inches) of lunar soil.
Read more at www.sciencealert.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-29--Thousands Protest at Key Cancer Research Agency over Wireless Radiation Dangers

Research has already determined that exposure to wireless radiation – Bluetooth , cell phone radiation , WiFi , and 5G – is biologically harmful AND at least increases cancer risk ( see 1 , 2 ) .
Many doctors and scientists also insist there is enough scientific evidence to re-classify it as a carcinogen .
Protesters in France feel the same way .
Stop5G European Alliance : Thousands demonstrate in front of the International Agency for Research on Cancer Headquarters in Lyon , France calling for the ” urgent reclassification ” of wireless radiation as a carcinogen .
“ Great @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Lyon ( France ) with the European Stop 5G Alliance : thousands of citizens from different countries gathered this morning in front of the headquarters of IARC , the International Agency for Research on Cancer belonging to the WHO World Health Organization .
It is the agency responsible for the reclassification of the carcinogenesis of electrosmog , radio frequency non-ionizing waves .
From all , the same request : “ no conflicts of interest in scientific research , the reclassification of cancer from electrosmog is urgently needed ” .
Sources of wireless radiation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , laptops , Wi-Fi routers , cell towers , and antennas .
Popular wearables ( ear buds , activity trackers , etc . )
, medical devices , and other “ Smart ” technology like utility “ Smart ” Meters emit radiation too .
Exposure is cumulative and some will undoubtedly tolerate it better than others .
The same thing can be said about other toxins as well – chloroform , engine exhaust , lead , tobacco products , etc .
The European Stop 5G Alliance , born last year in Switzerland , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the European Parliament in Brussels .
The information and videos on this page is from Oasisana .

Thousands Protest at Key Cancer Research Agency over Wireless Radiation Dangers
Written by B.N. Frank
Research has already determined that exposure to wireless radiation – Bluetooth, cell phone radiation, WiFi, and 5G – is biologically harmful AND at least increases cancer risk (see 1, 2). Many doctors and scientists also insist there is enough scientific evidence to re-classify it as a carcinogen. Protesters in France feel the same way.
From Environmental Health Trust:
Stop5G European Alliance: Thousands demonstrate in front of the International Agency for Research on Cancer Headquarters in Lyon, France calling for the”urgent reclassification” of wireless radiation as a carcinogen.
Activist Post reports regularly about unsafe technology. For more information visit our archives and the following websites:
Read more at www.activistpost.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related