principiascientificinternational--2020-09-29--Johnson & Johnson launches huge human trial of COVID-19 vaccine

Pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson started a massive human trial of its coronavirus vaccine Wednesday , lining up another option as federal officials told Congress they will resist political pressure ahead of an unprecedented push to inoculate the country .
The Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of J & J said it plans to enroll up to 60,000 adults at nearly 215 clinical research sites in the U.S. and abroad .
The company said its vaccine candidate offers twin advantages over some of its competitors — it can be delivered in a single dose and doesn ’ t require unusually cold storage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Operation Warp Speed , ” is supporting private drugmakers as it tries to lock down a successful vaccine before the end of the year .
Three companies — AstraZeneca , Pfizer and Moderna — began their phase 3 trials weeks ago and expect to receive data on whether their candidates are effective as soon as late October .
President Trump said he ’ s encouraged by the record pace of development .
Mr. Trump also said he ’ s distributed $ 200 million in CARES Act so that states can distribute an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to do that the instant it is approved , ” Mr. Trump said .
Many view a vaccine as the most critical tool in getting life back to normal .
The coronavirus pandemic that began in Wuhan , China , in December , has devastated economies and killed nearly 1 million worldwide , including more than 200,000 in the U.S .
Critics of the Trump administration fear the president will force the Food and Drug Administration to approve a vaccine for emergency use before Election Day , before it is fully vetted .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ not authorize or approve a vaccine that we would not feel comfortable giving to our families , ” he told the Senate Health , Education , Labor and Pensions Committee .
He said science will guide the agency ’ s decisions and the “ FDA will not permit any pressure from anyone to change that.
” Later Wednesday , the president chafed at reports the FDA might beef up its standard for approving a vaccine for emergency authorization use , or EUA , to make sure the public has confidence in its review @ @ @ @ @ @ @ move , ” Mr. Trump said .
“ I ’ m saying why would they have to be adding great length to the process ?
” The president said he trusts companies to do rigorous testing in conjunction with government support .
“ I don ’ t see any reason why it should be delayed further , ” Mr. Trump said .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Defend The Scientific Method .

Johnson & Johnson launches huge human trial of COVID-19 vaccine
Written by Tom Howell Jr.
Pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson started a massive human trial of its coronavirus vaccine Wednesday, lining up another option as federal officials told Congress they will resist political pressure ahead of an unprecedented push to inoculate the country.
The Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of J&J said it plans to enroll up to 60,000 adults at nearly 215 clinical research sites in the U.S. and abroad. The company said its vaccine candidate offers twin advantages over some of its competitors — it can be delivered in a single dose and doesn’t require unusually cold storage temperatures.
The Trump administration, through “Operation Warp Speed,” is supporting private drugmakers as it tries to lock down a successful vaccine before the end of the year.
Three companies — AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Moderna — began their phase 3 trials weeks ago and expect to receive data on whether their candidates are effective as soon as late October.
President Trump said he’s encouraged by the record pace of development.
“We encourage Americans to enroll in the vaccine trial,” Mr. Trump said of J&J. “It is not only interesting, it will be a terrific thing for our country.”
Mr. Trump also said he’s distributed $200 million in CARES Act so that states can distribute an eventual vaccine immediately.
“We want to do that the instant it is approved,” Mr. Trump said.
Many view a vaccine as the most critical tool in getting life back to normal. The coronavirus pandemic that began in Wuhan, China, in December, has devastated economies and killed nearly 1 million worldwide, including more than 200,000 in the U.S.
Critics of the Trump administration fear the president will force the Food and Drug Administration to approve a vaccine for emergency use before Election Day, before it is fully vetted.
FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn rejected those claims in Senate testimony Wednesday.
“In the end, FDA will not authorize or approve a vaccine that we would not feel comfortable giving to our families,” he told the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee.
He said science will guide the agency’s decisions and the “FDA will not permit any pressure from anyone to change that.”
Later Wednesday, the president chafed at reports the FDA might beef up its standard for approving a vaccine for emergency authorization use, or EUA, to make sure the public has confidence in its review.
“That sounds like a political move,” Mr. Trump said. “I’m saying why would they have to be adding great length to the process?”
The president said he trusts companies to do rigorous testing in conjunction with government support.
“I don’t see any reason why it should be delayed further,” Mr. Trump said.
Read more at www.washingtontimes.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-29--NY Times exposes why major COVID19 clinical trials will fail

Peter Doshi , associate editor of the medical journal BMJ , and Eric Topol , Scripps Research professor of molecular medicine , have written a devastating NY Times opinion piece about the ongoing COVID vaccine clinical trials .
They expose the fatal flaw in the large Pfizer , AstraZeneca , and Moderna trials .
September 22 , the Times : “ These Coronavirus Trials Don ’ t Answer the One Question We Need to Know ” : “ If you were to approve a coronavirus vaccine , would you approve one that you only knew protected people only from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one that would prevent its serious complications ?
” “ The answer is obvious .
You would want to protect against the worst cases.
” “ But that ’ s not how the companies testing three of the leading coronavirus vaccine candidates , Moderna , Pfizer and AstraZeneca , whose U.S. trial is on hold , are approaching the problem.
” “ According to the protocols for their studies , which they released late last week , a vaccine could meet the companies ’ benchmark for success if it lowered the risk of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to reduce moderate or severe forms of the disease , or the risk of hospitalization , admissions to the intensive care unit or death.
” “ To say a vaccine works should mean that most people no longer run the risk of getting seriously sick .
That ’ s not what these trials will determine.
” This means these clinical trials are dead in the water .
The trials are designed to show effectiveness in preventing mild cases of COVID , which nobody should care about , because mild cases naturally run their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ IS NO NEED FOR A VACCINE THAT PREVENTS MILD CASES .
Now let ’ s go deeper .
Read the next section from the Times piece , and then I ’ ll make comments .
“ The Moderna and AstraZeneca studies will involve about 30,000 participants each ; Pfizer ’ s will have 44,000 .
Half the participants will receive two doses of vaccines separated by three or four weeks , and the other half will receive saltwater placebo shots .
The final determination of efficacy will occur after 150 to 160 participants @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it works .
The vaccine companies are looking for a total of 150 ( mild ) COVID cases to occur , combined , in the two groups ; those receiving the placebo and those receiving the vaccine .
How would that happen ?
The researchers believe ‘ the coronavirus is spreading everywhere and it will pounce on some of the volunteers in the clinical trial.
’ Let ’ s say that , during the trial , 100 people receiving the placebo develop mild COVID-19 , and only 50 people receiving the vaccine develop @ @ @ @ @ @ @ say , ‘ We just proved the vaccine is 50 % effective in preventing COVID , and that ’ s all we need to do , in order to win authorization from the FDA .
Release the vaccine .
Inject the world.
’ The irrelevant outcomes for 150 people equal ‘ let ’ s shoot up seven billion people.
’ That ’ s staggering .
But it gets even worse .
The magic number of 150 COVID cases ?
How is a COVID case defined ?
The authors of the Times piece have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Pfizer trials , even a mild case of Covid-19 — for instance , a cough plus a positive lab test — would qualify and muddy the results .
AstraZeneca is slightly more stringent but would still count mild symptoms like a cough plus fever as a case.
” But wait .
The NY Times itself recently published an article stating that up to 90 % of US COVID cases could very well be false positives—in other words , not cases at all .
Why ?
Because the diagnostic PCR test , as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is too sensitive .
It registers ‘ positive for COVID ’ when it shouldn ’ t .
So , in these vaccine clinical trials , the whole process of determining that ‘ 150 people developed COVID-19 ’ is completely unreliable , useless , absurd , and nonsensical .
Other than that , the clinical trials are perfect .
Yes , perfectly ridiculous .
There is much more in the Times opinion piece , but I ’ ll leave it there .
“ So the magic number is 150 ?
That ’ s the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the planet ?
” “ And these 150 people , who you say develop COVID-19…you really can ’ t confirm that because the definition of a COVID case is so vague and the PCR test is so unreliable.
” “ And come to think of it , the people receiving the vaccine in the clinical trials could develop symptoms indistinguishable from COVID-19 , as a result of the effects of the vaccine.
” “ But you ’ re very confident in the success of the vaccine.
” “ I have to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as incompetent frauds , our bottom line will take a huge hit.
” “ Thank you , sir .
And that ’ s tonight ’ s news .
Make sure you take the vaccine , everyone .
It ’ s vital .
This is Fred J Clown , for CBS-NBC-ABC-CNN-FOX-PBS-AP-Reuters and all official news sources East , West , North , and South .
The News , brought to you by Venom-X-2 , a medicine that has only 463 adverse effects .
Ask your doctor if Venom is right for you.
” Now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the vital information again , but this time I ’ m going to show you how… The vaccine companies can use the fatal flaw in their protocol design to… Actually win approval of their COVID vaccine .
Stick with me .
This is big .
Only 150 people are needed to make the major clinical trials of a COVID vaccine look like a success .
Out of 30,000 volunteers in a trial , researchers are waiting for 150 people to “ come down with COVID-19.
” MILD cases .
They assume this will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ everywhere , and it ’ ll infect their volunteers .
Of course , their definition of a mild case of COVID-19 is meaningless .
Cough plus fever , and a positive PCR test .
The test spits out false positives like a rigged slot machine , and the visible symptoms could result from flu , polluted air , or too many candy bars .
Nevertheless , the researchers are waiting for a total of 150 people to “ catch a mild case of COVID.
” When that number is reached , everything stops @ @ @ @ @ @ @ How many of those 150 COVID cases occurred in the group that received the vaccine , and how many in the group that received the placebo shot of salt water ?
Let ’ s say only 50 COVID cases occurred in the vaccine group , and 100 in the placebo group .
The researchers pop champagne corks .
They say , “ Look , the vaccine is 50 % effective at preventing COVID , and that ’ s all we need to win authorization from the FDA.
” BUT suppose 70 cases occurred @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the placebo group ?
No good .
No good at all .
No way to call the vaccine effective .
Now comes the “ reshaping of the data.
” HERE WE GO .
The researchers say , “ Wait .
Thirty of the COVID cases in the vaccine group were REALLY just adverse reactions to the vaccine .
They weren ’ t cases of COVID .
You see , the vaccine can cause symptoms that are indistinguishable from mild COVID .
Cough , fever , chills .
ACTUALLY , there were only 40 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Half as many as in the placebo group .
The vaccine IS 50 % effective .
We don ’ t really need to wait until we have a total of 150 COVID cases .
We ’ re good .
We ’ re golden .
We can get authorization from the FDA right now to shoot up everybody in America !
” Vaccine manufacturers HAVE KNOWN ALL ALONG that they could pull this trick .
Why risk a few hundred billion dollars of profit on a random distribution of mild COVID cases among @ @ @ @ @ @ @ There is yet a further devious twist .
The New York Times article I just analyzed torpedoed the vaccine manufacturers for designing their trial protocols to prevent MILD cases of COVID .
Why ?
Because no one needs a vaccine that can do that .
Mild cases are not a problem or a threat .
They cure themselves quickly .
No vaccine is necessary in the first place .
BUT the definition of a mild COVID case is EXACTLY what the vaccine manufacturers needed .
It enabled them to hatch a plan , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fail .
They could pawn off a MILD case of COVID on a vaccine reaction .
They could fake that without causing ripples .
The FDA would say , “ The vaccine reactions aren ’ t serious .
All right , no problem .
We ’ ll approve this vaccine for emergency use.
” However…If the manufacturers designed their clinical trial protocol to prevent serious cases of COVID , they would be waiting to see 150 cases of really sick people to occur .
That might never happen .
If it did happen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their devious switcheroo trick and blame the vaccine for some of these SERIOUS cases… They would have to tell the FDA that their vaccine was causing life-threatening pneumonia ; and the FDA , under a lot of scrutiny these days , would find it very difficult to overlook that .
FDA : “ We can ’ t approve this vaccine .
It could cause a few million cases of dire pneumonia… ” The vaccine companies didn ’ t make a titanic stupid mistake in their protocol design .
In gearing the protocol to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what they did on purpose .
It allows them to “ reshape their data ” and win FDA approval for their vaccine .
These companies have no intention of failing , starting over , and spending a year recruiting 30,000 new volunteers .
They want success and money now .
They want to win the race .
And they could win , if the truth isn ’ t known and shared widely .
About the author : Jon Rappoport has penned three explosive collections , THE MATRIX REVEALED , EXIT FROM THE MATRIX @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California .
He maintains a consulting practice for private clients , the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power .
Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize , he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years , writing articles on politics , medicine , and health for CBS Healthwatch , LA Weekly , Spin Magazine , Stern , and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

NY Times exposes why major COVID19 clinical trials will fail
Written by Jon Rappoport
Peter Doshi, associate editor of the medical journal BMJ, and Eric Topol, Scripps Research professor of molecular medicine, have written a devastating NY Times opinion piece about the ongoing COVID vaccine clinical trials.
They expose the fatal flaw in the large Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna trials.
PART ONE:THE FAILURE
September 22, the Times: “These Coronavirus Trials Don’t Answer the One Question We Need to Know”:
“If you were to approve a coronavirus vaccine, would you approve one that you only knew protected people only from the most mild form of Covid-19, or one that would prevent its serious complications?”
“The answer is obvious. You would want to protect against the worst cases.”
“But that’s not how the companies testing three of the leading coronavirus vaccine candidates, Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, whose U.S. trial is on hold, are approaching the problem.”
“According to the protocols for their studies, which they released late last week, a vaccine could meet the companies’ benchmark for success if it lowered the risk of mild Covid-19, but was never shown to reduce moderate or severe forms of the disease, or the risk of hospitalization, admissions to the intensive care unit or death.”
“To say a vaccine works should mean that most people no longer run the risk of getting seriously sick. That’s not what these trials will determine.”
This means these clinical trials are dead in the water.
The trials are designed to show effectiveness in preventing mild cases of COVID, which nobody should care about, because mild cases naturally run their course and cause no harm. THERE IS NO NEED FOR A VACCINE THAT PREVENTS MILD CASES.
Now let’s go deeper. Read the next section from the Times piece, and then I’ll make comments.
“The Moderna and AstraZeneca studies will involve about 30,000 participants each; Pfizer’s will have 44,000. Half the participants will receive two doses of vaccines separated by three or four weeks, and the other half will receive saltwater placebo shots. The final determination of efficacy will occur after 150 to 160 participants develop Covid-19…”
Here’s how it works. The vaccine companies are looking for a total of 150 (mild) COVID cases to occur, combined, in the two groups; those receiving the placebo and those receiving the vaccine. How would that happen? The researchers believe ‘the coronavirus is spreading everywhere and it will pounce on some of the volunteers in the clinical trial.’
Let’s say that, during the trial, 100 people receiving the placebo develop mild COVID-19, and only 50 people receiving the vaccine develop mild COVID.
The vaccine companies would say, ‘We just proved the vaccine is 50% effective in preventing COVID, and that’s all we need to do, in order to win authorization from the FDA. Release the vaccine. Inject the world.’
The irrelevant outcomes for 150 people equal ‘let’s shoot up seven billion people.’ That’s staggering.
But it gets even worse. The magic number of 150 COVID cases? How is a COVID case defined? The authors of the Times piece have the answer:
“In the Moderna and Pfizer trials, even a mild case of Covid-19 — for instance, a cough plus a positive lab test — would qualify and muddy the results. AstraZeneca is slightly more stringent but would still count mild symptoms like a cough plus fever as a case.”
But wait. The NY Times itself recently published an article stating that up to 90% of US COVID cases could very well be false positives—in other words, not cases at all. Why? Because the diagnostic PCR test, as it is performed by many labs, is too sensitive. It registers ‘positive for COVID’ when it shouldn’t.
So, in these vaccine clinical trials, the whole process of determining that ‘150 people developed COVID-19’ is completely unreliable, useless, absurd, and nonsensical.
Other than that, the clinical trials are perfect. Yes, perfectly ridiculous.
There is much more in the Times opinion piece, but I’ll leave it there.
“So the magic number is 150? That’s the number that will decide the immediate fate of the planet?”
“Of course.”
“And these 150 people, who you say develop COVID-19…you really can’t confirm that because the definition of a COVID case is so vague and the PCR test is so unreliable.”
“Correct.”
“And come to think of it, the people receiving the vaccine in the clinical trials could develop symptoms indistinguishable from COVID-19, as a result of the effects of the vaccine.”
“Yes, that’s right.”
“But you’re very confident in the success of the vaccine.”
“Indeed.”
“Why?”
“I have to be confident. If we’re exposed as incompetent frauds, our bottom line will take a huge hit.”
“Thank you, sir. And that’s tonight’s news. Make sure you take the vaccine, everyone. It’s vital. This is Fred J Clown, for CBS-NBC-ABC-CNN-FOX-PBS-AP-Reuters and all official news sources East, West, North, and South. The News, brought to you by Venom-X-2, a medicine that has only 463 adverse effects. Ask your doctor if Venom is right for you.”
PART TWO: THE DEVIOUS TRICK
Now I’m going to go over the vital information again, but this time I’m going to show you how…
The vaccine companies can use the fatal flaw in their protocol design to…
Actually win approval of their COVID vaccine.
Stick with me. This is big.
Only 150 people are needed to make the major clinical trials of a COVID vaccine look like a success.
Out of 30,000 volunteers in a trial, researchers are waiting for 150 people to “come down with COVID-19.” MILD cases. They assume this will happen because they believe the coronavirus is everywhere, and it’ll infect their volunteers.
Of course, their definition of a mild case of COVID-19 is meaningless. Cough plus fever, and a positive PCR test. The test spits out false positives like a rigged slot machine, and the visible symptoms could result from flu, polluted air, or too many candy bars.
Nevertheless, the researchers are waiting for a total of 150 people to “catch a mild case of COVID.” When that number is reached, everything stops.
Now comes the big moment. How many of those 150 COVID cases occurred in the group that received the vaccine, and how many in the group that received the placebo shot of salt water?
Let’s say only 50 COVID cases occurred in the vaccine group, and 100 in the placebo group. The researchers pop champagne corks. They say, “Look, the vaccine is 50% effective at preventing COVID, and that’s all we need to win authorization from the FDA.”
BUT suppose 70 cases occurred in the vaccine group and 80 in the placebo group? No good. No good at all. No way to call the vaccine effective.
Now comes the “reshaping of the data.”
HERE WE GO.
The researchers say, “Wait. Thirty of the COVID cases in the vaccine group were REALLY just adverse reactions to the vaccine. They weren’t cases of COVID. You see, the vaccine can cause symptoms that are indistinguishable from mild COVID. Cough, fever, chills. ACTUALLY, there were only 40 cases of COVID in the vaccine group. Half as many as in the placebo group. The vaccine IS 50% effective. We don’t really need to wait until we have a total of 150 COVID cases. We’re good. We’re golden. We can get authorization from the FDA right now to shoot up everybody in America!”
Vaccine manufacturers HAVE KNOWN ALL ALONG that they could pull this trick.
Why leave things to chance?
Why risk a few hundred billion dollars of profit on a random distribution of mild COVID cases among the volunteers in their clinical trials?
There is yet a further devious twist. The New York Times article I just analyzed torpedoed the vaccine manufacturers for designing their trial protocols to prevent MILD cases of COVID. Why?
Because no one needs a vaccine that can do that. Mild cases are not a problem or a threat. They cure themselves quickly. No vaccine is necessary in the first place.
BUT the definition of a mild COVID case is EXACTLY what the vaccine manufacturers needed. It enabled them to hatch a plan, to make sure they didn’t fail.
They could pawn off a MILD case of COVID on a vaccine reaction. They could fake that without causing ripples. The FDA would say, “The vaccine reactions aren’t serious. All right, no problem. We’ll approve this vaccine for emergency use.”
However…If the manufacturers designed their clinical trial protocol to prevent serious cases of COVID, they would be waiting to see 150 cases of really sick people to occur. That might never happen.
If it did happen, and the manufacturers had to pull their devious switcheroo trick and blame the vaccine for some of these SERIOUS cases…
They would have to tell the FDA that their vaccine was causing life-threatening pneumonia; and the FDA, under a lot of scrutiny these days, would find it very difficult to overlook that.
FDA: “We can’t approve this vaccine. It could cause a few million cases of dire pneumonia…”
The vaccine companies didn’t make a titanic stupid mistake in their protocol design. In gearing the protocol to prevent MILD COVID cases, they did what they did on purpose. It allows them to “reshape their data” and win FDA approval for their vaccine.
These companies have no intention of failing, starting over, and spending a year recruiting 30,000 new volunteers. They want success and money now. They want to win the race.
And they could win, if the truth isn’t known and shared widely.
About the author: Jon Rappoport has penned three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-29--COVID: DARPA’s Bio Chip Implants Due Out 2021?

The most significant scientific discovery since gravity has been hiding in plain sight for nearly a decade and its destructive potential to humanity is so enormous that the biggest war machine on the planet immediately deployed its vast resources to possess and control it , financing its research and development through agencies like the National Institutes of Health ( NIH ) , the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency ( DARPA ) and HHS ’ BARDA .
The revolutionary breakthrough came to a Canadian scientist named Derek Rossi in 2010 purely by accident .
The now-retired Harvard professor claimed in an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ found a way to “ reprogram ” the molecules that carry the genetic instructions for cell development in the human body , not to mention all biological lifeforms .
These molecules are called ‘ messenger ribonucleic acid ’ or mRNA and the newfound ability to rewrite those instructions to produce any kind of cell within a biological organism has radically changed the course of Western medicine and science , even if no one has really noticed yet .
As Rossi , himself , puts it : It was so big that by 2014 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the company he co-founded with Flagship Pioneering private equity firm to exploit his innovation , – Moderna Inc. , attracted almost a half billion dollars in federal award monies to begin developing vaccines using the technology .
No longer affiliated with Moderna beyond his stock holdings , Rossi is just “ watching for what happens next ” and if he ’ s anything like the doting “ hockey dad ” he is portrayed to be , he must be horrified .
As early as 2006 , DARPA was already researching how to identify @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Predicting Health and Disease ( PHD ) program , which led to the creation of the agency ’ s Biological Technologies Office ( BTO ) , as reported by Whitney Webb in a May article for The Last American Vagabond .
In 2014 , DARPA ’ s BTO launched its “ In Vivo Nanoplatforms ” ( IVN ) program , which researches implantable nanotechnologies , leading to the development of ‘ hydrogel ’ .
Hydrogel is a nanotechnology whose inventor early on boasted that “ If [ it ] pans out , with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get the sensors implanted in their core to measure their levels of glucose , oxygen , and lactate.
” This contact lens-like material requires a special injector to be introduced under the skin where it can transmit light-based digital signals through a wireless network like 5G .
Once firmly implanted inside the body , human cells are at the mercy of any mRNA program delivered via this substrate , unleashing a nightmare of possibilities .
It is , perhaps , the first true step towards full-on transhumanism ; a “ philosophy ” that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ influential people , such as Google ’ s Ray Kurzweil and Eric Schmidt and whose proponents see the fusion of technology and biology as an inevitable consequence of human progress .
The private company created to market this technology , that allows for biological processes to be controlled remotely and opens the door to the potential manipulation of our biological responses and , ultimately , our entire existence , is called Profusa Inc and its operations are funded with millions from NIH and DARPA .
In March , the company was quietly inserted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2020 , when it announced an injectable biochip for the detection of viral respiratory diseases , including COVID-19 .
In July , a preliminary report funded by Fauci ’ s NIAID and the NIH on an mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 was published in The New England Journal of Medicine , concluding that mRNA-1273 vaccine .
provided by Moderna for the study , “ induced anti–SARS-CoV-2 immune responses in all participants , and no trial-limiting safety concerns were identified , ” and supported “ further development of this vaccine.
” A month earlier , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Moderna ’ s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine , citing a contract signed in December , 2019 , stipulating that the “ mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates [ are ] developed and jointly owned ” by both parties .
Moderna disputes the federal government ’ s position , stating that the company “ has a broad owned and licensed IP estate ” and is “ not aware of any IP that would prevent us from commercializing our product candidates , including mRNA-1273.
” The only obstacle is a delivery system , which though Moderna claims @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to get FDA approval before the federal government ’ s own DARPA-developed hydrogel technology , in tandem with Profusa ’ s DARPA-funded light sensor technology , which is expected to receive fast track authorization from the Food and Drug Administration by early 2021 and , more than likely , used to deploy a coronavirus vaccine with the capacity to literally change our DNA .
In addition , the Department of Health and Human Services ( HHS ) , is currently investigating Moderna ’ s patent filings , claiming it failed to disclose “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine candidate patent applications , as required by law .
The technicality could result in the federal government owning a 100 percent stake in mRNA-1273 .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

COVID: DARPA’s Bio Chip Implants Due Out 2021?
Written by Raul Diego
The most significant scientific discovery since gravity has been hiding in plain sight for nearly a decade and its destructive potential to humanity is so enormous that the biggest war machine on the planet immediately deployed its vast resources to possess and control it, financing its research and development through agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and HHS’ BARDA.
The revolutionary breakthrough came to a Canadian scientist named Derek Rossi in 2010 purely by accident. The now-retired Harvard professor claimed in an interview with the National Post that he found a way to “reprogram” the molecules that carry the genetic instructions for cell development in the human body, not to mention all biological lifeforms.
These molecules are called ‘messenger ribonucleic acid’ or mRNA and the newfound ability to rewrite those instructions to produce any kind of cell within a biological organism has radically changed the course of Western medicine and science, even if no one has really noticed yet. As Rossi, himself, puts it:
“The real important discovery here was you could now use mRNA, and if you got it into the cells, then you could get the mRNA to express any protein in the cells, and this was the big thing.”
It was so big that by 2014, Rossi was able to retire after the company he co-founded with Flagship Pioneering private equity firm to exploit his innovation, – Moderna Inc., attracted almost a half billion dollars in federal award monies to begin developing vaccines using the technology.
No longer affiliated with Moderna beyond his stock holdings, Rossi is just “watching for what happens next” and if he’s anything like the doting “hockey dad” he is portrayed to be, he must be horrified.
Remote control biology
As early as 2006, DARPA was already researching how to identify viral, upper respiratory pathogens through its Predicting Health and Disease (PHD) program, which led to the creation of the agency’s Biological Technologies Office (BTO), as reported by Whitney Webb in a May article for The Last American Vagabond. In 2014, DARPA’s BTO launched its “In Vivo Nanoplatforms” (IVN) program, which researches implantable nanotechnologies, leading to the development of ‘hydrogel’.
Hydrogel is a nanotechnology whose inventor early on boasted that “If [it] pans out, with approval from FDA, then consumers could get the sensors implanted in their core to measure their levels of glucose, oxygen, and lactate.” This contact lens-like material requires a special injector to be introduced under the skin where it can transmit light-based digital signals through a wireless network like 5G.
Once firmly implanted inside the body, human cells are at the mercy of any mRNA program delivered via this substrate, unleashing a nightmare of possibilities. It is, perhaps, the first true step towards full-on transhumanism; a “philosophy” that is in vogue with many powerful and influential people, such as Google’s Ray Kurzweil and Eric Schmidt and whose proponents see the fusion of technology and biology as an inevitable consequence of human progress.
The private company created to market this technology, that allows for biological processes to be controlled remotely and opens the door to the potential manipulation of our biological responses and, ultimately, our entire existence, is called Profusa Inc and its operations are funded with millions from NIH and DARPA. In March, the company was quietly inserted into the crowded COVID-19 bazaar in March 2020, when it announced an injectable biochip for the detection of viral respiratory diseases, including COVID-19.
A wholly-owned subsidiary
In July, a preliminary report funded by Fauci’s NIAID and the NIH on an mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 was published in The New England Journal of Medicine, concluding that mRNA-1273 vaccine. provided by Moderna for the study, “induced anti–SARS-CoV-2 immune responses in all participants, and no trial-limiting safety concerns were identified,” and supported “further development of this vaccine.”
A month earlier, the NIH had claimed a joint stake in Moderna’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, citing a contract signed in December, 2019, stipulating that the “mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates [are] developed and jointly owned” by both parties. Moderna disputes the federal government’s position, stating that the company “has a broad owned and licensed IP estate” and is “not aware of any IP that would prevent us from commercializing our product candidates, including mRNA-1273.”
The only obstacle is a delivery system, which though Moderna claims to be developing separately, is unlikely to get FDA approval before the federal government’s own DARPA-developed hydrogel technology, in tandem with Profusa’s DARPA-funded light sensor technology, which is expected to receive fast track authorization from the Food and Drug Administration by early 2021 and, more than likely, used to deploy a coronavirus vaccine with the capacity to literally change our DNA.
In addition, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), is currently investigating Moderna’s patent filings, claiming it failed to disclose “federal government support” in its COVID vaccine candidate patent applications, as required by law. The technicality could result in the federal government owning a 100 percent stake in mRNA-1273.
Raul Diego is a MintPress News Staff Writer, independent photojournalist, researcher, writer and documentary filmmaker.
Read more at www.mintpressnews.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-29--Wind Turbines Generate Mountains Of Waste, Not Energy

Environmentalists and wind energy opportunists ( entrepreneurs who take advantage of overly generous tax credits and multiple other subsidies ) want you to believe wind energy is as pure “ green ” as newly driven snow is white , and as cheap as Taco Bell .
They never tell you about the costs – or the environmental destruction – that they have hidden from you for decades .
But neither do most governments , news media , or social media .
Ars Technica science editor John Timmer says wind hardware prices are dropping , even as new turbine designs are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ turbine .
Timmer did admit that “ wind is even cheaper at the moment because of a tax credit given to renewable energy generation ” [ emphasis added ] .
He cautioned that phasing out the many existing incentives could surely create uncertainties regarding wind ’ s future cost and dominance .
But that ’ s about it .
The U.S. Department of Energy ’ s 2018 Wind Technologies Market Report glowingly stated : “ With the support of federal tax incentives , both wind and solar power purchase agreement ( PPA ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of burning natural gas in existing gas-fired combined-cycle units.
” This is despite the fact that the DOE ’ s own data show wind ’ s “ capacity factor ” ( percent of time actually generating electricity at full capability ) is only 35 % , compared to 57 % for natural gas plants and 92 % for nuclear .
In many locations , huge industrial wind facilities actually generate power well below 30 % of the year .
On the hottest and coldest days , it ’ s often close to zero @ @ @ @ @ @ @ plants actually produced 20 % of U.S. electricity in 2019 , despite having only 9 % of the nation ’ s generation capacity .
In addition to being weather-dependent , intermittent , and unreliable , wind turbines cover vast areas of land ; affect scenic views and local wind flow , temperature , and moisture ; kill bats and birds of prey , with no penalties under migratory bird or endangered species laws ; have relatively short life spans and require massive amounts of raw materials , especially for ocean turbines , compared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nuclear plants ; involve enormous air and water pollution in faraway countries where a lot of the mining , processing , and manufacturing are done , before turbine parts are shipped to America ; and more .
All this is just ignored .
Similarly , you might also be surprised to learn that not a single page of that massive DOE report mentions the term “ wind turbine waste.
” Nor does the DOE ’ s Fact Sheet , “ Advancing the Growth of the U.S. Wind Industry : Federal Incentives , Funding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as if wind turbines never die and never leave anything behind .
Typically , when turbines reach end-of-life , the project owner replaces the old turbines and blades with newer models ; only a few companies have chosen total decommissioning and removal .
Some states ( most recently Texas and North Carolina ) and localities have their own standards .
But the only federal standards ( overseen by the Bureau of Land Management ) are for facilities on federal lands .
The DOE fact sheet provides information on four tax credit programs , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sources for R & D grants and cooperative agreements , and five sources for technology deployment grants – plus a number of partnership opportunities with DOE national laboratories .
But it is silent on wind turbine waste , including huge concrete and rebar foundations , and blades that are up to 107 meters ( 351 feet ) long .
So are most politicians , wind advocates , and wind energy publications .
In fact , turbine foundations and blades are generally not recyclable , economically , or otherwise .
The volume of wind @ @ @ @ @ @ @ years to come , with mining and manufacturing waste , service waste , and end-of-life waste the major sources .
It is estimated there will be 43 million metric tons just of blade waste worldwide by 2050 .
China is projected to be responsible for generating 40 % of the waste , followed by Europe ( 25 % ) and the USA ( 19 % ) .
London-based Principia Scientific International calls turbine blades “ a toxic amalgam of unique composites , fiberglass , epoxy , polyvinyl chloride foam , polyethylene terephthalate foam @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Basically , there is just too much plastic-composite-epoxy crapola that isn ’ t worth recycling.
” Until better methods are found , landfills are one of the few options .
In the European Union , used blades are cut up and burned in kilns or power plants .
But not in the USA .
A separate tractor-trailer is needed to haul each blade to a landfill , and cutting them up requires powerful specialized equipment .
With some 8,000 blades a year already being removed from service just in the United States @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the next four years ; in a few years , the numbers will be five times higher .
Some wind energy companies cut the huge blades into short sections before sending them to landfills because most landfills lack cutting tools .
Today ’ s turbine blades are 20 % longer and their towers up to 200 feet taller than most of those currently being landfilled .
Turbine disposal costs are upwards of $ 400,000 apiece .
That means $ 24 billion to dispose of the 60,000 turbines currently in use in the U.S @ @ @ @ @ @ @ existing landfills will rise as more , longer , heavier blades reach their end of life .
Over the next 20 years , the U.S. alone could have to dispose of 720,000 tons of waste blade material .
Yet , a 2018 report predicted a 15 % drop in U.S. landfill capacity by 2021 , with only some 15 years ’ capacity remaining .
We will have to permit entirely new landfills simply to handle wind turbine waste – on top of mountains of solar and battery waste .
But that is just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Locke Foundation cites the University of Kansas studies confirming that wind farms create unsafe flying conditions .
The rotational force of wind turbines can create extreme turbulence that makes flying dangerous and landing close by nearly impossible .
Indeed , a Michigan county bars air ambulances from rescuing citizens living near wind farms , due to safety concerns .
Moreover , generating just today ’ s U.S. electricity output with wind power could warm continental USA surface temperatures by 0.24°C ( 0.43°F ) , with the warming effect strongest at night .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ generated by solar photovoltaic systems , but not insignificant – and the larger the wind farm , the greater the localized warming .
Back in 2013 , when turbines were smaller than today , Lafarge North America said it took about 750 cubic yards ( 2,500,000 pounds ) of concrete ( plus rebar ) to anchor just one wind turbine ; Nextera wind admitted to using over 800 metric tons of concrete per smaller turbine .
( These figures do not include the significant concrete and asphalt needed to upgrade rural roads to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , manufacturing concrete is already the third-largest emitter of ( shudder ! )
carbon dioxide – after burning coal , oil , and natural gas .
It also requires nearly a tenth of the world ’ s industrial water use .
To sum up , wind farms require a lot of carbon dioxide-emitting concrete , steel , aluminum , plastics , rare earth , and other materials .
They disturb natural airflows .
They decimate bird and bat populations and cause infrasound and light-flicker that impair human health while generating relatively little electricity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dead turbine blades overwhelm landfills .
Yet , advocates would have you believe wind is cheap , clean , green , renewable , and sustainable .
The Green New Deal joke would be funny if it weren ’ t so economically and ecologically expensive .
Duggan Flanakin is the director of policy research for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow ( www.CFACT.org ) PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please @ @ @ @ @ @ @ To Defend The Scientific Method .

Wind Turbines Generate Mountains Of Waste, Not Energy
Written by Duggan Flanakin
Environmentalists and wind energy opportunists (entrepreneurs who take advantage of overly generous tax credits and multiple other subsidies) want you to believe wind energy is as pure “green” as newly driven snow is white, and as cheap as Taco Bell.
They never tell you about the costs – or the environmental destruction – that they have hidden from you for decades. But neither do most governments, news media, or social media.
Ars Technica science editor John Timmer says wind hardware prices are dropping, even as new turbine designs are increasing the typical power generated by each turbine.
Timmer did admit that “wind is even cheaper at the moment because of a tax credit given to renewable energy generation” [emphasis added].
He cautioned that phasing out the many existing incentives could surely create uncertainties regarding wind’s future cost and dominance. But that’s about it.
The U.S. Department of Energy’s 2018 Wind Technologies Market Report glowingly stated: “With the support of federal tax incentives, both wind and solar power purchase agreement (PPA) prices are now below the projected cost of burning natural gas in existing gas-fired combined-cycle units.”
This is despite the fact that the DOE’s own data show wind’s “capacity factor” (percent of time actually generating electricity at full capability) is only 35%, compared to 57% for natural gas plants and 92% for nuclear.
In many locations, huge industrial wind facilities actually generate power well below 30% of the year. On the hottest and coldest days, it’s often close to zero.
That’s why nuclear power plants actually produced 20% of U.S. electricity in 2019, despite having only 9% of the nation’s generation capacity.
In addition to being weather-dependent, intermittent, and unreliable, wind turbines cover vast areas of land; affect scenic views and local wind flow, temperature, and moisture; kill bats and birds of prey, with no penalties under migratory bird or endangered species laws; have relatively short life spans and require massive amounts of raw materials, especially for ocean turbines, compared to coal, gas, hydroelectric or nuclear plants; involve enormous air and water pollution in faraway countries where a lot of the mining, processing, and manufacturing are done, before turbine parts are shipped to America; and more.
All this is just ignored. Similarly, you might also be surprised to learn that not a single page of that massive DOE report mentions the term “wind turbine waste.”
Nor does the DOE’s Fact Sheet, “Advancing the Growth of the U.S. Wind Industry: Federal Incentives, Funding and Partnership Opportunities.” It’s as if wind turbines never die and never leave anything behind.
Typically, when turbines reach end-of-life, the project owner replaces the old turbines and blades with newer models; only a few companies have chosen total decommissioning and removal.
Some states (most recently Texas and North Carolina) and localities have their own standards. But the only federal standards (overseen by the Bureau of Land Management) are for facilities on federal lands.
The DOE fact sheet provides information on four tax credit programs, three loan and grant programs, four sources for R&D grants and cooperative agreements, and five sources for technology deployment grants – plus a number of partnership opportunities with DOE national laboratories.
But it is silent on wind turbine waste, including huge concrete and rebar foundations, and blades that are up to 107 meters (351 feet) long. So are most politicians, wind advocates, and wind energy publications.
In fact, turbine foundations and blades are generally not recyclable, economically, or otherwise.
The volume of wind turbine waste is projected to soar in years to come, with mining and manufacturing waste, service waste, and end-of-life waste the major sources.
It is estimated there will be 43 million metric tons just of blade waste worldwide by 2050. China is projected to be responsible for generating 40% of the waste, followed by Europe (25%) and the USA (19%).
London-based Principia Scientific International calls turbine blades “a toxic amalgam of unique composites, fiberglass, epoxy, polyvinyl chloride foam, polyethylene terephthalate foam, balsa wood, and polyurethane coatings. Basically, there is just too much plastic-composite-epoxy crapola that isn’t worth recycling.”
Until better methods are found, landfills are one of the few options.
In the European Union, used blades are cut up and burned in kilns or power plants. But not in the USA.
A separate tractor-trailer is needed to haul each blade to a landfill, and cutting them up requires powerful specialized equipment.
With some 8,000 blades a year already being removed from service just in the United States, that’s 32,000 truckloads over the next four years; in a few years, the numbers will be five times higher.
Some wind energy companies cut the huge blades into short sections before sending them to landfills because most landfills lack cutting tools. Today’s turbine blades are 20% longer and their towers up to 200 feet taller than most of those currently being landfilled.
Turbine disposal costs are upwards of $400,000 apiece. That means $24 billion to dispose of the 60,000 turbines currently in use in the U.S. The cost and the toll on existing landfills will rise as more, longer, heavier blades reach their end of life.
Over the next 20 years, the U.S. alone could have to dispose of 720,000 tons of waste blade material. Yet, a 2018 report predicted a 15% drop in U.S. landfill capacity by 2021, with only some 15 years’ capacity remaining.
We will have to permit entirely new landfills simply to handle wind turbine waste – on top of mountains of solar and battery waste.
But that is just the tip of the iceberg. The Locke Foundation cites the University of Kansas studies confirming that wind farms create unsafe flying conditions.
The rotational force of wind turbines can create extreme turbulence that makes flying dangerous and landing close by nearly impossible. Indeed, a Michigan county bars air ambulances from rescuing citizens living near wind farms, due to safety concerns.
Moreover, generating just today’s U.S. electricity output with wind power could warm continental USA surface temperatures by 0.24°C (0.43°F), with the warming effect strongest at night.
This is only a tenth of the warming generated by solar photovoltaic systems, but not insignificant – and the larger the wind farm, the greater the localized warming.
Back in 2013, when turbines were smaller than today, Lafarge North America said it took about 750 cubic yards (2,500,000 pounds) of concrete (plus rebar) to anchor just one wind turbine; Nextera wind admitted to using over 800 metric tons of concrete per smaller turbine. (These figures do not include the significant concrete and asphalt needed to upgrade rural roads to handle heavy turbine components.)
Furthermore, manufacturing concrete is already the third-largest emitter of (shudder!) carbon dioxide – after burning coal, oil, and natural gas. It also requires nearly a tenth of the world’s industrial water use.
To sum up, wind farms require a lot of carbon dioxide-emitting concrete, steel, aluminum, plastics, rare earth, and other materials. They disturb natural airflows.
They decimate bird and bat populations and cause infrasound and light-flicker that impair human health while generating relatively little electricity at low capacity and high cost. Dead turbine blades overwhelm landfills.
Yet, advocates would have you believe wind is cheap, clean, green, renewable, and sustainable. The Green New Deal joke would be funny if it weren’t so economically and ecologically expensive.
Duggan Flanakin is the director of policy research for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org)
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-29--WW1 climate anomaly may have worsened 1918 pandemic

More and his colleagues suspect that the climate anomaly disrupted wind patterns enough to interfere with migrating birds .
Mallard @ @ @ @ @ back and forth between western Europe and Russia , are important reservoirs of avian flu @ @ @ @ @ primarily passed from animals to people through water sources contaminated with infected birds ’ droppings @ @ @ @ @ that the ducks can alter their typical migratory journeys in responses to changes in the @ @ @ @ @ may have kept the birds on the western front through the autumn in 1917 and @ @ @ @ @ military and civilian populations , providing an excellent opportunity for the virus to cross between @ @ @ @

More and his colleagues suspect that the climate anomaly disrupted wind patterns enough to interfere with migrating birds. Mallard ducks, which normally travel back and forth between western Europe and Russia, are important reservoirs of avian flu viruses. These viruses are primarily passed from animals to people through water sources contaminated with infected birds’ droppings.
Other studies have shown that the ducks can alter their typical migratory journeys in responses to changes in the environment. The inclement weather may have kept the birds on the western front through the autumn in 1917 and 1918, close to both military and civilian populations, providing an excellent opportunity for the virus to cross between species and mutate.


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-29--Jobs That Will Outlast COVID-19

Jobs That Will Outlast COVID-19

COVID-19 has lasted longer than most people anticipated .
This pandemic has cost millions of people their jobs and forced many small businesses to shut their doors for good .
Your favorite local eatery might not make it through COVID-19 , but jobs in tech are poised to beat the virus .
COVID-19 has driven everyday life online , increasing the demand for people who can create online infrastructure .
Instead of having a drink at the corner bar , we must interact virtually through Zoom or watch movies distantly through Netflix Party .
These two experiences are only possible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Attending one of the top coding bootcamps could put you in a position to get a job helping the world unite on the Internet .
Before deciding on a bootcamp , it ’ s a good idea to research some of the possible careers a coding bootcamp could get you .
The people who create apps are called mobile app developers .
A simple title , but to become a mobile app developer , you must know the ins and outs of an app platform , Android or iOS .
A developer will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ apps depending on their platform .
Mobile apps are becoming increasingly common .
Even small businesses require apps .
Apps are super accessible to users because they can be carried around in their pocket and very quickly accessed .
Each app you have on your phone was the work of a team of mobile app developers .
This position isn ’ t only about coding .
There are some soft skills a mobile developer must have to be successful .
Mobile developers must be agile problem solvers .
Phone software is updated frequently @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their code to keep their apps functioning correctly .
They should also be adept team players .
Creating apps isn ’ t a one-person show ; it requires multiple people to get the job done .
Team players are bound to succeed as mobile developers .
A coding bootcamp is an excellent way to learn how to become a mobile developer .
The Internet will likely outlast our current crisis as well .
Companies are looking for creative minds to build websites as web designers .
Web designers have fulfilling careers constructing web @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media outlets .
Their goal is to make a site that keeps users engaged , but doesn ’ t overwhelm them .
There is a lot of aesthetics that go into creating a well functioning website besides the coding .
User experience is also the focus of a web designer .
They ask the question : “ Is the user able to accomplish their goal when they visit this site ?
” If a visitor wishes to make a purchase but doesn ’ t know how to place the item in their cart @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up .
A web designer must be able to get inside the customer ’ s head to fill needs .
A soft skill that a web designer must have is empathy .
A web designer who understands their customer is capable of reducing barriers for potential customers .
Reducing barriers creates a more efficient process , likely resulting in repeat visitors or customers .
One of these top web design bootcamps will surely equip you with the skills needed to land a web design job .
Tech jobs aren ’ t limited to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and world , there is a need for persons with coding abilities .
One perk to tech jobs is they are available for remote work .
Even in cities where sports , culture , or nature overshadows tech industries , there are bootcamps and jobs available .
Los Angeles , known for Hollywood , smog , and celebrities , is still an excellent spot for tech jobs .
Movie production is increasingly reliant on new technology .
Attending a Los Angeles bootcamp , a tech bootcamp , not fitness bootcamp , might @ @ @ @ @ @ @ job at a movie production company .
Quarantine has forced us to stay home , and we can only watch The Office reruns before we go stir crazy .
Take advantage of the extra time we have and learn a skill that could result in an industry that is continuing to grow despite the current state of the world .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Scientific Method .

Donate Today!
Currently, joining PSI is free. When you make a donation of the suggested amount of $25 (any amount will help, though!) you will help to sponsor sound, alarmist-free scientific work.


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-30--How many millions do the lockdowners plan to kill?

How many millions do the lockdowners plan to kill ?
The crazies who think “ public health ” should mean “ a monomaniacal fixation on one virus ” should have to answer more for the non-virus wreckage they ’ re leaving everywhere .
Last week I told you about Gret Glyer , the creator of the amazing DonorSee philanthropy app .
Donors help specific people and small projects .
And they mean the world to recipients .
True to the name , donors really can see the results : hence DonorSee .
For example , you donate to help a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on your phone you receive a video of the person seeing for the first time .
My listeners raised money to build a house for a widow in Malawi — and then we got a video tour of the house , and a message of thanks from her and her family .
Well , I just had Gret on the Tom Woods Show again , and he talked to us about how the lockdown regimes are decimating the developing world .
He himself lives in Malawi for three years , so he is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ These people are living hand to mouth , he tells us in the episode .
That means that each day they earn enough money to eat for that day , and that ’ s it .
Now imagine ordering them to stay at home for weeks or even months at a time .
Oh , the state will help them ?
These societies have no welfare state worth speaking of .
This is pure devastation .
Even The Atlantic had to admit , “ When you ask them to stay home , in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to starve.
” And in the UK , The Telegraph says , “ The absurd demand that developing countries adopt economically disastrous lockdowns is driving untold misery.
” Why are the perpetrators of this fiasco never required to answer for this ?
Gret walks us through the numbers and the reality : tomwoods.com About the author : Thomas Ernest Woods Jr. is an American author , historian and libertarian who is currently a senior fellow at the Mises Institute .
Woods is a New York Times Best-Selling author and has published twelve books @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

How many millions do the lockdowners plan to kill?
Written by Tom Woods
The crazies who think “public health” should mean “a monomaniacal fixation on one virus” should have to answer more for the non-virus wreckage they’re leaving everywhere.
For instance:
Last week I told you about Gret Glyer, the creator of the amazing DonorSee philanthropy app. Donors help specific people and small projects. And they mean the world to recipients. True to the name, donors really can see the results: hence DonorSee.
For example, you donate to help a blind person see again, and then on your phone you receive a video of the person seeing for the first time. My listeners raised money to build a house for a widow in Malawi — and then we got a video tour of the house, and a message of thanks from her and her family.
It’s a miracle, truly.
Well, I just had Gret on the Tom Woods Show again, and he talked to us about how the lockdown regimes are decimating the developing world. He himself lives in Malawi for three years, so he is intimately acquainted with their particular vulnerabilities.
These people are living hand to mouth, he tells us in the episode. That means that each day they earn enough money to eat for that day, and that’s it.
Now imagine ordering them to stay at home for weeks or even months at a time. Oh, the state will help them? These societies have no welfare state worth speaking of. This is pure devastation.
Even The Atlantic had to admit, “When you ask them to stay home, in many cases you’re asking them to starve.”
And in the UK, The Telegraph says, “The absurd demand that developing countries adopt economically disastrous lockdowns is driving untold misery.”
Why are the perpetrators of this fiasco never required to answer for this?
Gret walks us through the numbers and the reality: tomwoods.com
About the author: Thomas Ernest Woods Jr. is an American author, historian and libertarian who is currently a senior fellow at the Mises Institute. Woods is a New York Times Best-Selling author and has published twelve books.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-30--Proof that the pandemic was planned & with purpose

Proof that the pandemic was planned & with purpose This large group of medical experts publishes a medical newspaper on 500,000 copies every week , to inform the public about the massive misinformation in the mainstream media .
They also organize mass protests in Europe , like the one on August 29 , 2020 where 12 million people signed up and several millions actually showed up .
Hundreds of Spanish medical doctors say the pandemic is planned ‘ Covid-19 is a false pandemic created for political purposes .
This is a world dictatorship with a sanitary excuse .
We urge @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to stop this criminal operation , by spreading the truth.
’ ( 2 ) Germany and Spain are just two examples .
Similar large groups of hundreds of medical experts exist in countries across the world .
In the USA a documentary called PLANDEMIC , which exposes COVID-19 as a criminal operation , is supported by over 27,000 medical doctors !
Why are these thousands of medical professionals worldwide saying the pandemic is a crime ?
What information do they have access to , that we are not getting from the mainstream media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the following facts with an open mind and then come to your own conclusions… The COVID-19 ‘ project ’ is planned until 2025 Fauci guaranteed a pandemic within the next two years A few months before the outbreak , Bill Gates – the world ’ s nr 1 vaccine dealer – organized an event in New York City .
Guess what the event was all about ?
It was a ‘ coronavirus pandemic exercise ’ .
Yes , you read that right : Bill Gates organized a coronavirus pandemic exercise , right before @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the auditorium , you see the text printed : ‘ We need to prepare for the event that becomes a pandemic.
’ This pandemic exercise was called Event201 and took place in October 2019 , literally right before the outbreak .
Their conclusion was that all of humanity must be vaccinated… Excitement about selling vaccines in the next year In 2018 The Institute for Disease Modeling made a video in which they show a flu virus originating in China , from the area of Wuhan , and spreading all over the world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ A Simulation For A Global Flu Pandemic.
’ That is exactly what happened , two years later .
Why did they say it would come from China ?
Why not Africa , where far more diseases are present ?
Or why not South America ?
Or India ?
How could they know there would be a flu virus coming from China and even show Wuhan as the originating area , that would infect the whole world ?
20 years of research say : the vaccine will change our DNA Doctor Carrie Madej @ @ @ @ @ @ @ before she went to the Dominican Republic to do humanitarian work .
She studied DNA and vaccines for the past twenty years and made an urgent video in which she warns that there is a plan to inject humanity with very dangerous vaccines for Covid-19 .
The purpose of these new vaccines will be twofold : 1 ) reprogram our DNA and make us hybrids that are easier to control .
2 ) connect us to artificial intelligence through a digital vaccine ID , which will also open a whole new realm of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has observed multiple times how diseases were spread over populations by air craft .
Because of satefy reasons she is not able to share more details about this in public .
Depopulate the earth by means of organized epidemics

Proof that the pandemic was planned & with purpose
Written by Dr James Fetzer
A group of over 500 medical doctors in Germany called ‘Doctors for Information’ made a shocking statement during a national press conference: (1) ‘The Corona panic is a play. It’s a scam. A swindle. It’s high time we understood that we’re in the midst of a global crime.’
This large group of medical experts publishes a medical newspaper on 500,000 copies every week, to inform the public about the massive misinformation in the mainstream media. They also organize mass protests in Europe, like the one on August 29, 2020 where 12 million people signed up and several millions actually showed up.
Why do these 500+ medical doctors say the pandemic is a global crime? What do they know, that we don’t?
Hundreds of Spanish medical doctors say the pandemic is planned
In Spain a group of 600 medical doctors called ‘Doctors for Truth’, made a similar statement during a press conference.
‘Covid-19 is a false pandemic created for political purposes. This is a world dictatorship with a sanitary excuse. We urge doctors, the media and political authorities to stop this criminal operation, by spreading the truth.’ (2) Germany and Spain are just two examples. Similar large groups of hundreds of medical experts exist in countries across the world. In the USA a documentary called PLANDEMIC, which exposes COVID-19 as a criminal operation, is supported by over 27,000 medical doctors! Why are these thousands of medical professionals worldwide saying the pandemic is a crime? What information do they have access to, that we are not getting from the mainstream media? I invite you to look at the following facts with an open mind and then come to your own conclusions…
In 2015 a testing method was patented for… COVID-19 In 2015 a ‘System and Method for Testing for COVID-19’ was patented by Richard Rothschild, with a Dutch government organisation. Did you catch that? In 2015 – four years before the disease even existed – a testing method for COVID-19 was developed. (2B) Take a deep breath and let that sink in for a while…
Millions of COVID-19 test kits
sold in 2017 and 2018 As we know the new COVID-19 disease appeared in China towards the end of 2019. Therefore it was named COVID-19 which is an acronym for Corona Virus Disease 2019. Data from the World Integrated Trade Solution, however, shows something astonishing:
in 2017 and 2018 – two years before COVID-19 – hundreds of millions of test kits for COVID-19 were distributed worldwide. ‘Quick! Hide it!!’ This baffling data was discovered by someone on September 5, 2020, who posted it on social media. The next day it went viral all over the world. On September 6 the WITS suddenly changed the original designation ‘COVID-19’ into the vague ‘Medical Test Kits’. This is not allowed in trade, because you always have to be specific. There are many types of test kits for different diseases. The fact that they removed the specification ‘COVID-19’, after this data became known worldwide, proves that they don’t want anyone to know about it. They however forgot to delete one detail: the product code for these ‘Medical Test Kits’ is 300215 which means: ‘COVID-19 Test Kits’
Their cover up came too late: this critical information was uncovered and is being revealed by millions worldwide. You can download a PDF that shows the original data of this website.
The COVID-19 ‘project’
is planned until 2025
The World Bank shows that COVID-19 is a project that is planned to continue until… end of March 2025! So the intention is to continue it for another FIVE YEARS. (2C)
Fauci guaranteed a pandemic within the next two years
In 2017 Anthony Fauci made a very strange prediction, with an even stranger certainty. With complete confidence Fauci announced that during the first term of President Trump a surprise outbreak of an infectious disease would surely happen. Here’s what he said: (3) There is NO QUESTION there is going to be a challenge for the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases. There will be a SURPRISE OUTBREAK.
There’s NO DOUBT in anyones mind about this. How could Fauci guarantee a surprise outbreak to happen during the first term of the Trump administration? What did he know, that we don’t?
Bill and Melinda Gates guaranteed an imminent global pandemic
In 2018 Bill Gates publicly announced that a global pandemic was on it’s way that could wipe out 30 million people. He said this would probably happen during the next decade. (4) Melinda Gates added that an engineered virus is humanities greatest threat and also assured this would hit humanity in the coming years. (5) Let their choice of words resound into your mind for a moment…
They claim that the dense population of the world guarantees this imminent global pandemic. But let’s be honest: most of the earth is uninhabited. Just fly over America in an airplane and look out the window. You see empty space most of the time, with a few cities here and there. Most of the United States is still wide open and empty. The same goes for the rest of the world. Australia, Russia, India, China, America, Africa… it’s wilderness for the most part. Our planet isn’t nearly as populated as Bill Gates wants us to believe. This world map shows it clearly…
Most of the earth is totally void of any human presence. So the idea that the world is vastly overpopulated and is therefor bound to give rise to an imminent global pandemic is a lie. The Gates also claimed that air travel was sure to create a global pandemic. But countless people have been traveling in airplanes the past century. Did that give rise to constant outbreaks of global pandemics? Of course not! Their arguments why they guaranteed a global pandemic in the next few years are lies. So what is their real basis to make such guaranteed predictions?
Practicing for a pandemic
A few months before the outbreak, Bill Gates – the world’s nr 1 vaccine dealer – organized an event in New York City. Guess what the event was all about? It was a ‘coronavirus pandemic exercise’. Yes, you read that right: Bill Gates organized a coronavirus pandemic exercise, right before it happened! On the large display in the auditorium, you see the text printed: ‘We need to prepare for the event that becomes a pandemic.’ This pandemic exercise was called Event201 and took place in October 2019, literally right before the outbreak. Their conclusion was that all of humanity must be vaccinated…
Excitement about selling vaccines in the next year
Shortly after this ‘exercise for a coronavirus pandemic’ Bill Gates tweeted: I’m particularly excited about what the next year could mean for one of the best buys in global health: vaccines.
Think about this: the world’s nr 1 vaccine dealer guarantees a global pandemic to occur in the next few years, and his wife said we should all fear an engineered virus that is ‘on its way’. Then they organize an exercise for an imminent global pandemic and say vaccines will be the only solution. Next Bill Gates tweets how excited he is about selling vaccines in the next year. Immediately after that, the announced pandemic breaks out. Indeed, right away Bill Gates proclaims that the only solution for humanity is to buy his vaccines…
2020 coronavirus pandemic
predicted in 2013
Back in 2013 a musician wrote a song called PANDEMIC. In his lyrics he described a global pandemic that kills millions, shuts down economies and gives rise to riots. His song literally described in great detail what we are seeing in our world today, seven years later. He even mentioned the exact year of the pandemic: 2020, and the specific type of virus: a coronavirus. (6) This is a line in his lyrics from 2013: ‘2020 combined with CoronaVirus, bodies stacking.’
This song also predicted the riots that are now raging throughout America: ‘The State is rioting, using the street outside. It’s coming to your windows.’
How could this musician have known in 2013 that a coronavirus pandemic would break out in 2020, and that during this pandemic riots would erupt? He explains:
‘Get ready for a global coronavirus pandemic’
In September 2019 – also right before the outbreak – the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board released a report titled ‘A World At Risk’. It stressed the need to be prepared for… a coronavirus outbreak! On the cover of the report is the picture of a coronavirus and people wearing face masks.
In the report we read the following interesting paragraph: ‘The United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two system-wide training and simulation exercises, including one for covering the deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.’ Did you catch that? They have been practicing for a deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.
Outbreak from China announced
In 2018 The Institute for Disease Modeling made a video in which they show a flu virus originating in China, from the area of Wuhan, and spreading all over the world, killing millions. They called it ‘A Simulation For A Global Flu Pandemic.’ That is exactly what happened, two years later. Why did they say it would come from China? Why not Africa, where far more diseases are present? Or why not South America? Or India? How could they know there would be a flu virus coming from China and even show Wuhan as the originating area, that would infect the whole world?
Was this coronavirus engineered?
Where did the virus come from? One of the world’s leading experts in bioweapons is Dr. Francis Boyle. He is convinced it originated from a bioweapon lab in Wuhan, the Bio Safety Lab Level 4. This facility is specialized in the development of… coronaviruses! They take existing viruses and ‘weaponize’ them, meaning they make them far more dangerous, to be used as a biological weapon. In the following two minute video clip you see a spokesperson for the Trump administration, bioweapon expert Dr. Francis Boyle and president Trump talk about how this virus came from the lab in Wuhan.
Now comes the interesting part: in 2015 Anthony Fauci gave this very lab 3,7 million dollars. Figure this: the same man who guaranteed a surprise outbreak of a virus in the next two years, gave almost 4 million dollars to a lab that develops coronaviruses. In the short clip below you can see a journalist ask president Trump about this grant given by Fauci to the Wuhan lab.
There are however more options in Wuhan where this virus could have originated from. Some believe it came from the Wuhan Virology Institute, where they also work on weaponizing coronaviruses.
Movies predicted the coronavirus pandemic
Predictive programming is the process of informing the population about events that are soon to occur. The past years several movies and television series were produced, about… a global coronavirus pandemic! The film ‘Dead Plague’ depicts a global pandemic with a coronavirus and even mentions hydroxychloroquine as the cure. Another film called ’Contagion’ shows how a coronavirus spreads globally with social distancing, face masks, lock-downs, washing of hands etc. as a result. Literally everything we see now, is predicted in detail in these movies.
Pandemic depicted during Olympics summergames in 2012
Talking about predictive programming: during the opening show of the Summer Olympics in 2012, a coronavirus pandemic was played out for the eyes of the whole world. Dozens of hospital beds, large numbers of nurses becoming puppets of a controlling system, death lurking about, a demonic giant rising up over the world, and the whole theatre was lit up in such a way that seen from the sky it looked like a coronavirus. Why did the Olympic Games show a coronavirus pandemic, in their opening show?
Worldwide lockdown predicted in 2008
The author and investigator Robin de Ruiter predicted in 2008 that there would come a global lockdown. He said the purpose of this would be to create a new world of authoritarian control. Because much of what he wrote back in 2008 is now happening right in front of our eyes, this book has been republished.
Journalists predicted
planned pandemic
In 2014 the investigative journalist Harry Vox predicted a planned global pandemic and said why the ‘ruling class’ would do such thing: ‘They will stop at nothing to complete their toolkit of control. One of the things that had been missing from their toolkit is quarantines and curfews. The plan is to get hundreds of thousands of people infected with it and create the next phase of control.’ (7)
‘Scenario for the Future’
This renown researcher refers to a famous document by the Rockefeller Foundation in which everything we see happening now is literally predicted in great detail: the global pandemic, the lock-downs, the collapse of the economy and the imposing of authoritarian control. It’s all described with terrifying accuracy… ten years before it happened!
The document is titled ‘Scenario for the Future of Technology and International Development’. (9) That says it all: a scenario for the future. It has a chapter called ‘LockStep’ in which a global pandemic is reported as if it happened in the past, but which is clearly intended as a rehearsal for the future.
The ‘Scenario for the Future’ continues with comparing two different responses to their predicted pandemic: the USA only ‘strongly discouraged’ people from flying, while China enforced mandatory quarantine for all citizens. The first response is accused of spreading the virus even more, while the imposing of a suffocating lock-down is praised. Then it goes on to describe the implementation of totalitarian control: During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets.
Clearly the flexing of authority is the desired response. But it gets worse, according to this ‘Scenario of the Future’: ‘Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified.’ ‘In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests.’
Handbook for global control
Now that the announced pandemic is indeed here, the same Rockefeller Foundation came forward with step two: a handbook on how to implement new control systems during this pandemic. Only when all the required control networks are in place, can the world open up again.
When you combine the two Rockefeller documents, you see the plan: 1) First they announce a global pandemic with a coronavirus and say what it should lead to: a whole new level of authoritarian control. 2) Secondly they give practical steps on how to apply this control system. These are illustrations and quotes from their guide:
‘Digital apps and privacy-protected tracking software should be widely used to enable more complete contact tracking.’ ‘In order to fully control the Covid-19 epidemic, we need to test the majority of the population on a weekly basis.’
According to their ‘Scenario of the future’ the entire world population should get a digital ID that indicates who has received all the vaccines. Without sufficient vaccinations, access to schools, concerts, churches, public transport etc. will be denied. Now in 2020 that is exactly what Bill Gates and many governments are calling for.
Everyone’s contacts must be checked
In a leaked government video (10) we see a conversation between former American president Bill Clinton and Andrew Cuomo, the governor of the state of New York. They discuss how to set up a large control system to test the entire population and check all their contacts. They discuss how to build an army to carry out this control system.
The plan: inject mankind with DNA altering vaccine
The famous investigative journalist Anthony Patch did years of research concerning the plans to control the world, by means of created pandemics and mandatory vaccines. During an interview in 2014 this researcher predicted the following: ‘They will release a man-made coronavirus. As a result the people will demand a vaccine to protect them. This vaccine will add a third strain of DNA to a persons body, essentially making them a hybrid. Once a person is injected, almost immediately their DNA undergoes a transformation. This genetic change will cause people to loose the ability to think for themselves, without them even being aware this happened. Thus they can be controlled easier, to become slaves for the elite.’
Of course that sounds insane and it is insane indeed. Yet we have to be aware that this professional investigator is no fool. He has done years of research and this is what he discovered over the years.
20 years of research say:
the vaccine will change our DNA
Doctor Carrie Madej directed two large clinics in Georgia, before she went to the Dominican Republic to do humanitarian work. She studied DNA and vaccines for the past twenty years and made an urgent video in which she warns that there is a plan to inject humanity with very dangerous vaccines for Covid-19. The purpose of these new vaccines will be twofold: 1) reprogram our DNA and make us hybrids that are easier to control.
2) connect us to artificial intelligence through a digital vaccine ID, which will also open a whole new realm of control. This medical expert says she has observed multiple times how diseases were spread over populations by air craft. Because of satefy reasons she is not able to share more details about this in public.
Depopulate the earth by means of organized epidemics
Dr. John Coleman is a famous Intelligence Officer from the CIA who wrote a book titled ‘The Committee of 300’. In it he explains how secret societies manipulate governments, health care, food industries, the media and so on. This book can be found on the website of the CIA. (15) One of the primary goals of the many secret societies, that control governments and the media, is to depopulate the earth. Dr. Coleman says the following about their strategy:
Maintain humanity under 500,000,000
In 1980 a granite monument was erected in Georgia, called the Guidestones. A set of 10 guidelines is inscribed on the structure in eight modern languages and a shorter message is inscribed at the top of the structure in four ancient language scripts. The first guideline goes as follows: 1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. The CIA officer Dr. Coleman revealed that one of their methods to ‘maintain humanity’ is to cause ‘organized epidemics of fatal rapid acting diseases’.
Using vaccines to reduce humanity
During a TED talk Bill Gates echoed this goal, when he literally said that new vaccines can be used to reduce the world’s population with 10 – 15%! (16)
Covid19 vaccine
for population control?
Mike Adams is a published food scientist, author of the popular science book Food Forensics and founder of ISO-accredited CWC Labs. Years ago he said the following: An engineered bioweapon will be released in population centers. There will be calls for massive government funding for the vaccine industry to come up with a vaccine. Miraculously they will have a vaccine developed in record time. Everyone will be required to line up and take this vaccine shot.
There is indeed a release of an engineered bioweapon, followed by a vaccine mandate, massive government funding for the vaccine industry and a vaccine that is being developed in record time. The rest of his message is that this vaccine will slowly begin to kill millions – if not billions – of people over the course of a few years. It will be a kill-switch vaccine, designed to reduce the world’s population.
Read more at jamesfetzer.org
****
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-30--UK Parliament Discussing Military Imposing Mandatory COVID Vaccine

A Conservative MP has called for mandatory coronavirus vaccination certificates distributed by the Army that will determine whether people will be allowed to travel internationally .
During a debate in the British Parliament last night , MP Tobias Ellwood urged the Prime Minister to have the British Armed Forces oversee that COVID-19 vaccination roll out process .
Noting that a coronavirus vaccine was potentially six months away , Ellwood said , “ Mass vaccine roll out is an enormous responsibility and we need to get it right.
” Ellwood said he had written to Boris Johnson urging him to give @ @ @ @ @ @ @ task force to ship the vaccines across the country and set up regional distribution hubs as well as developing a “ national database to track progress and issue the vaccination certificates.
” The MP said the vaccination certificates “ will probably have to be internationally recognized in order to allow travel , international travel.
” Ellwood went on to make it clear that people who take the vaccine will see their lives return to normality while those who don ’ t will still be “ subject to social distancing rules.
” The prospect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ travel to people who refuse to take a vaccine for personal , religious or medical reasons is shaping up to be a human rights minefield .
A poll conducted by King ’ s College London ( KCL ) and Ipsos Mori last month found that only 53 % of Brits would be “ certain ” or “ likely ” to get vaccinated for COVID-19 .
One in six said they would definitely not get a vaccine or that it would be very unlikely .
When extrapolated out to the population , this equates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ellwood ’ s advice is taken , will be denied travel and treated like second class citizens .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

UK Parliament Discussing Military Imposing Mandatory COVID Vaccine
Written by PJ Watson
A Conservative MP has called for mandatory coronavirus vaccination certificates distributed by the Army that will determine whether people will be allowed to travel internationally.
During a debate in the British Parliament last night, MP Tobias Ellwood urged the Prime Minister to have the British Armed Forces oversee that COVID-19 vaccination roll out process.
Noting that a coronavirus vaccine was potentially six months away, Ellwood said, “Mass vaccine roll out is an enormous responsibility and we need to get it right.”
Ellwood said he had written to Boris Johnson urging him to give the power to a Ministry of Defence task force to ship the vaccines across the country and set up regional distribution hubs as well as developing a “national database to track progress and issue the vaccination certificates.”
The MP said the vaccination certificates “will probably have to be internationally recognized in order to allow travel, international travel.”
Ellwood went on to make it clear that people who take the vaccine will see their lives return to normality while those who don’t will still be “subject to social distancing rules.”
The prospect of denying basic rights of mobility and travel to people who refuse to take a vaccine for personal, religious or medical reasons is shaping up to be a human rights minefield.
A poll conducted by King’s College London (KCL) and Ipsos Mori last month found that only 53% of Brits would be “certain” or “likely” to get vaccinated for COVID-19.
One in six said they would definitely not get a vaccine or that it would be very unlikely. When extrapolated out to the population, this equates to 11 million people who, if Ellwood’s advice is taken, will be denied travel and treated like second class citizens.
Read more here.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-30--Are Electric Cars As Green As Activists Claim?

Are Electric Cars As Green As Activists Claim ?
How green are electric cars ?
Are they really greener and more environmentally friendly than the cleanest conventional cars ?
That ’ s a question that is dividing opinion , even among green campaigners .
Environmental activist George Monbiot has warned that electric cars won ’ t solve the problems of car pollution and may even “ create another environmental disaster.
” Recently Auke Hoekstra and Professor Maarten Steinbuch published a study that claims electric vehicles already emit less than half the CO2 of combustion engine vehicles .
Professor Gautam Kalghatgi @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , claiming that the advantages of electric vehicles were smaller .
We approached Mr. Hoekstra with a request to react to this criticism .
Professor Kalghatgi in turn reacted to that and we gave Mr. Hoekstra the final word .
Professor Gautam Kalghatgi says that since much of the world ’ s electricity comes from fossil fuels , carbon dioxide emissions are simply being moved from driving electric cars to charging their batteries .
And once the impact of obtaining the resources required to build electric cars is taken into account , he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the environment .
But opinions among researchers are divided .
A leading proponent of electric cars , Auke Hoekstra of the Technical University of Eindhoven , maintains that the environmental disadvantages of fossil-fuelled cars outweigh their advantages .
The different views of Kalghatgi and Hoekstra are set out in a new Open Debate paper , published by the Global Warming Policy Foundation .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please @ @ @ @ @ @ @ To Defend The Scientific Method .

Are Electric Cars As Green As Activists Claim?
Written by Dr Benny Peiser
How green are electric cars? Are they really greener and more environmentally friendly than the cleanest conventional cars? That’s a question that is dividing opinion, even among green campaigners.
Environmental activist George Monbiot has warned that electric cars won’t solve the problems of car pollution and may even “create another environmental disaster.”
Recently Auke Hoekstra and Professor Maarten Steinbuch published a study that claims electric vehicles already emit less than half the CO2 of combustion engine vehicles.
Professor Gautam Kalghatgi wrote a critique of this new study, claiming that the advantages of electric vehicles were smaller.
We approached Mr. Hoekstra with a request to react to this criticism. Professor Kalghatgi in turn reacted to that and we gave Mr. Hoekstra the final word.
Professor Gautam Kalghatgi says that since much of the world’s electricity comes from fossil fuels, carbon dioxide emissions are simply being moved from driving electric cars to charging their batteries.
And once the impact of obtaining the resources required to build electric cars is taken into account, he thinks they may even be worse for the environment.
But opinions among researchers are divided. A leading proponent of electric cars, Auke Hoekstra of the Technical University of Eindhoven, maintains that the environmental disadvantages of fossil-fuelled cars outweigh their advantages.
The different views of Kalghatgi and Hoekstra are set out in a new Open Debate paper, published by the Global Warming Policy Foundation.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related