principiascientificinternational--2020-07-29--Why You Are Safer to Avoid Taking Vaccines

Why You Are Safer to Avoid Taking Vaccines Cowpox vaccine was believed able to immunize people against smallpox .
At the time this vaccine was introduced , there was already a decline in the number of cases of smallpox .
Japan introduced compulsory vaccination in 1872 .
In 1892 there were 165,774 cases of smallpox with 29,979 deaths despite the vaccination program .
A stringent compulsory smallpox vaccine program , which prosecuted those refusing the vaccine , was instituted in England in 1867 .
Within 4 years 97.5 % of persons between 2 and 50 had been vaccinated .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ epidemic [ 1 ] in its history with 44,840 deaths .
Between 1871 and 1880 the incidence of smallpox escalated from 28 to 46 per 100,000 .
The smallpox vaccine does not work .
Much of the success attributed to vaccination programs may actually have been due to improvement in public health related to water quality and sanitation , less crowded living conditions , better nutrition , and higher standards of living .
Typically the incidence of a disease was clearly declining before the vaccine for that disease was introduced .
In England @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 82 % before the polio vaccine was introduced in 1956 .
In the early 1900s an astute Indiana physician , Dr. W.B .
Clarke , stated “ Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with cowpox vaccine began to be introduced .
I have had to deal with two hundred cases of cancer , and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated [ 2 ] person.
” There is a widely held belief that vaccines should not be criticized because the public might refuse to take them .
This is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ known risks of the vaccines .
This important question does not appear to have ever been adequately studied .
Vaccines are enormously profitable for drug companies and recent legislation in the U.S. has exempted lawsuits against pharmaceutical firms in the event of adverse reactions to vaccines which are very common .
In 1975 Germany stopped requiring pertussis ( whooping cough ) vaccination .
Today less than 10 % of German children are vaccinated against pertussis .
The number of cases of pertussis has steadily decreased [ 3 ] even though far fewer children @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have occurred in schools with vaccination rates over 98 % in all parts of the U.S. including areas that had reported no cases of measles for years .
As measles immunization rates rise to high levels measles becomes a disease seen only in vaccinated persons .
An outbreak of measles occurred in a school where 100 % of the children had been vaccinated .
Measles mortality rates had declined by 97 % in England before measles vaccination was instituted .
In 1986 there were 1300 cases of pertussis in Kansas and 90 % @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had been adequately vaccinated .
Similar vaccine failures have been reported from Nova Scotia where pertussis continues to be occurring despite universal vaccination .
Pertussis remains endemic [ 4 ] in the Netherlands where for more than 20 years 96 % of children have received 3 pertussis shots by age 12 months .
After institution of diptheria vaccination in England and Wales in 1894 the number of deaths from diptheria rose by 20 % in the subsequent 15 years .
Germany had compulsory vaccination in 1939 .
The rate of diptheria spiraled to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which did not have compulsory vaccination , had only 50 cases of diptheria the same year .
The continued presence of these infectious diseases in children who have received vaccines proves that life long immunity which follows natural infection does not occur in persons receiving vaccines .
The injection process places the viral particles into the blood without providing any clear way to eliminate these foreign substances .
Why Do Vaccines Fail To Protect Against Diseases ?
Walene James , author of Immunization : the Reality Behind The Myth , states that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ necessary to create real immunity .
Prior to the introduction of measles and mumps vaccines children got measles and mumps and in the great majority of cases these diseases were benign .
Vaccines “ trick ” the body so it does not mount a complete inflammatory response to the injected virus .
The incidence of Sudden Infant Death syndrome SIDS has grown from .55 per 1000 live births in 1953 to 12.8 per 1000 in 1992 in Olmstead County , Minnesota .
The peak incidence for SIDS is age 2 to 4 months @ @ @ @ @ @ @ given to children .
85 % of cases of SIDS occur in the first 6 months of infancy .
The increase in SIDS as a percentage of total infant deaths has risen from 2.5 per 1000 in 1953 to 17.9 per 1000 in 1992 .
This rise in SIDS deaths has occurred during a period when nearly every childhood disease was declining due to improved sanitation and medical progress except SIDS .
These deaths from SIDS did increase during a period when the number of vaccines given a child was steadily rising to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was able to document 12 deaths in infants which appeared within 3½ and 19 hours of a DPT immunization .
He later reported 11 new cases of SIDS death and one near miss which had occurred within 24 hours of a DPT injection .
When he studied 70 cases of SIDS two thirds of these victims [ 6 ] had been vaccinated from one half day to 3 weeks prior to their deaths .
None of these deaths was attributed to vaccines .
Vaccines are a sacred cow and nothing against them appears @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so profitable to pharmaceutical firms .
There is valid reason to think that not only are vaccines worthless in preventing disease they are counterproductive because they injure the immune system permitting cancer , auto-immune diseases and SIDS to cause much disability and death .
Dr. Robert Strecker claimed that the department of defense DOD was given $ 10,000,000 in 1969 to create the AIDS virus to be used as a population-reducing [ 7 ] weapon against blacks .
By use of the Freedom of Information Act Dr. Strecker was able to learn that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ perform studies on immune destroying agents for germ warfare .
Once produced , the vaccine was given in two locations .
Smallpox vaccine containing HIV was given to 100,000,000 Africans in 1977 .
Over 2000 young white homosexual males in New York City were given Hepatitis B vaccine that contained HIV virus in 1978 .
This vaccine was given at New York City Blood Center .
The Hepatitis B vaccine containing the HIV virus was also administered to homosexual males in San Francisco , Los Angeles , St.Louis , Houston and Chicago in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ epidemiology studies have disclosed that these same 6 cities had the highest incidence of AIDS , Aids related Complex ( ARC ) and deaths rates from HIV , when compared to other U.S. cities .
When a new virus is introduced into a community .
It takes 20 years for the number of cases to double .
If the fabricated story that green monkey bites of pygmies led to the HIV epidemic , the alleged monkey bites in the 1940s should have produced a peak in the incidence of HIV in the 1960s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Africa .
The World Health Organization ( WHO ) began a African smallpox vaccination campaign in 1977 that targeted urban population centers and avoided pygmies .
If the green monkey bites of pygmies truly caused the HIV epidemic the incidence of HIV in pygmies should have been higher than in urban citizens .
However , the opposite was true .
In 1954 Dr. Bernice Eddy ( bacteriologist ) discovered live monkey viruses in supposedly sterile inactivated polio vaccine [ 8 ] developed by Dr. Jonas Salk .
This discovery was not well @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was demoted .
Later Dr. Eddy , working with Sarah Stewart , discovered SE polyoma virus .
This virus was quite important because it caused cancer in every animal receiving it .
Yellow fever vaccine had previously been found to contain avian ( bird ) leukemia virus .
Later Dr. Hilleman isolated SV 40 virus from both the Salk and Sabin polio vaccines .
There were 40 different viruses [ 9 ] in these polio vaccines they were trying to eradicate .
They were never able to get rid of these viruses ontaminating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ virus causes malignancies .
It has now been identified in 43 % of cases of non-Hodgekin lymphoma [ 10 ] , 36 % of brain tumors [ 11 ] , 18 % of healthy blood samples , and 22 % of healthy semen samples , mesothiolomas and other malignancies .
By the time of this discovery SV 40 had already been injected into 10,000,000 people in Salk vaccine .
Gastric digestion inactivtes some of SV 40 in Sabin vaccine .
However , the isolation of strains of Sabin polio vaccine from all 38 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ] GBS in Brazil suggests that significant numbers of persons are able to be infected from this vaccine .
All 38 of these patients had received Sabin polio vaccine months to years before the onset of GBS .
The incidence of non-Hodgekin lymphoma has ” mysteriouly ” doubled since the 1970s .
Dr. John Martin , Professor of Pathology at the Univ .
of Southern California , was employed by the Viral Oncology Branch of the Bureau of Biologics ( FDA ) from 1976 to 1980 .
While employed there he identified foreign @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Lederle that suggested serious vaccine contamination .
He warned his supervisors about this problem and was told to discontinue his work as it was outside the scope of testing required for polio vaccine .
Later Dr. Martin learned that all eleven of the African green monkeys used to grow the Lederle polio virus Orimune had grown simian cytomegalovirus from kidney cell cultures .
Lederle was aware of this viral contamination as their Cytomegaloviral Contamination Plan [ 13 ] clearly showed in 1972 .
The Bureau of Biologics decided not to pursue the matter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In 1955 Dr. Martin identified unique cell destroying viruses termed stealth viruses in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome .
These viruses lacked genes that would enable the immune system to recognize them .
Thus they were protected by the body ’ s failure to develop antiviral antibodies .
In March of 1995 , Dr. Martin learned that some of these stealth viruses had originated from African green monkey simian cytomegalovirus of a type known to infect man .
The Lederle vaccine experience suggests that the higher-ups are not concerned about sloppy and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ infection is a huge unsolved current problem for all vaccine manufacturing .
If this vaccine production sounds like an unbelievable mess to you , you are right .
The influential Club of Rome has a position paper in which they state that the world population is too large and needs to be reduced by 90 % .
This means that 6 billion people must be reduced to 500 to 600 million .
Obviously , creating famines and genocidal wars such as wrecked havoc in Africa , and loosing new laboratory-created diseases ( HIV @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and probably West Nile virus and SARS ) can help reduce the population .
Other elitist groups ( Trilaterals , Bildenbergers ) have expressed similar concerns about excess people on planet Earth .
The company that was projected to produce the new smallpox vaccine in the U.S. was in serious trouble in England because of unsatisfactory quality of operations before setting up their facility in the U.S. Why would their performance here be any better than it was in England ?
If there are important powerful groups of people that are determined @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could be a more diabolically clever way to eliminate people than to inject them with a cancer-causing vaccine ?
The person receiving the injection would never suspect that the vaccine taken 10 to 15 years earlier had caused the cancer to appear .
In the March 4 , 1977 issue of Science Jonas and Darrell Salk warn , “ Live virus vaccines against influenza or poliomyelitis may in each instance produce the disease it intended to prevent .
The live virus against measles and mumps may produce such side effects as encephalitis ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine was administered to the American public even though there had never been a case of swine flu identified in a human .
Farmers refused to use the vaccine because it killed too many animals .
Within a few months of use in humans this vaccine caused many cases of serious nerve injury ( Guillan Barre syndrome ) .
An article in the Washington Post on Jan. 26 , 1988 mentioned that all cases of polio since 1979 had been caused by the polio vaccine with no known cases of polio from a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have created a perfect situation to discontinue the vaccine , but the vaccine is still given .
Vaccines are a wonderful source of profits with no risks to the drug companies since vaccine injuries are now recompensed by the government .
The steady escalation in the number of vaccines administered has been followed by an identical rise in the incidence of auto-immune diseases ( rheumatoid arthritis , subacute lupus erythematosus , psoriasis , multiple sclerosis , asthma ) seen in children .
While there is a genetic transmission of some of these diseases @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from foreign protein particles , mercury , aluminum , formaldehyde and other toxic agents injected in vaccines .
In 1999 , the rotavirus vaccine was recommended by the Center for Disease Control for all infants .
When this vaccine program was instituted several infants died and many had life endangering bowel obstructions .
Prelicensure trials [ 15 ] of the rotavirus vaccine had demonstrated an increased incidence of intussusception 30 times greater than normal but the vaccine was released anyway without special warnings to practitioners to be on the lookout for bowel problems @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not studied for toxicity possibly because such study might eliminate them from being used .
A large study from Australia showed that the risk of developing encephalitis from the pertussis vaccine was 5 times greater than the risk of developing encephalitis by contacting pertussis by natural methods .
Naturally acquired immunity by illness evolves by spread of a virus from the respiratory tract to the liver , thymus , spleen , and bone marrow .
When symptoms begin , the entire immune response has been mobilized to repel the invading virus .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ confer life long immunity against that invading virus and prepares the child to respond promptly to an infection by the same virus in the future .
Vaccination , in contrast , results in the persisting of live virus or other foreign antigens within the cells of the body , a situation that may provoke auto-immune reactions as the body attempts to destroy its own infected cells .
There is no surprise that the incidence of auto-immune diseases ( rheumatoid arthritis , subacute lupus erythematosus , multiple sclerosis , asthma , psoriasis ) has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine immunization .
Dr. John Classen has published 29 articles on vaccine-induced [ 16 ] diabetes .
At least 8 of 10 children with Type 1 ( insulin needing ) diabetes have this disease as a result of vaccination .
These children may have avoided measles , mumps , and whooping cough but they have received something far worse : an illness that shortens life expectancy by 10 to 15 years and results in a life requiring constant medical care .
Dr. Classen has shown in Finland , the introduction of hemophilus type @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cases of type 1 diabetes as the number of deaths and brain damage from hemophilus influenza type b it might have prevented .
In New Zealand , the incidence of Type 1 diabetes in children rose by 61 % after an aggressive vaccine program against hepatitis B..
This same program has been started in the U.S.A. so we can now look forward to many cases of Type 1 diabetes in children .
Similar rises in Type 1 diabetes have been seen in England , Italy , Sweden , and Denmark after immunization programs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ toxic substances that are needed to prevent the vaccines from becoming infected or to improve the performance of the vaccine .
Among these substances are mercury , formaldehyde and aluminum .
[ 17 ] In the past 10 years , the number of autistic children has risen from between 200 and 500 percent in every state in the U.S .
This sharp rise in autism followed the introduction of measles , mumps and rubella vaccine in 1975 .
Representative Dan Burton ’ s healthy grandson was given injections for 9 diseases in one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by autism .
These injections contain a preservative of mercury called thimerosal .
The boy received 41 times the amount of mercury which is capable of harm to the body .
Mercury is a neurotoxin that can injure the brain and nervous system .
And tragically , it did .
In the United States the number of compulsory vaccine injections has increased from 10 to 36 in the last 25 years .
During this period , there has been a simultaneous increase in the number of children suffering learning disabilities and attention deficit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are related to intrauterine cerebral damage from maternal cocaine use , but probably vaccines cause many of the others .
Many vaccines contain aluminum .
A new disease called macrophagic myofasciitis causes pain in muscles , bones and joints .
All persons with this disease have received aluminum containing vaccines .
Deposits of aluminum are able to remain as an irritant in tissues and disturb the immune and nervous system for a lifetime .
Nearly all vaccines contain aluminum and mercury .
These metals appear to play an important role in the etiology @ @ @ @ @ @ @ expert at the 1997 International Vaccine Conference related that a person who takes 5 or more annual flu vaccine shots has increased the likelihood of developing Alzheimer ’ s Disease by a factor of 10 over the person who has had 2 or fewer flu shots .
When we take vaccines we are playing a modern version of Russian Roulette .
We not only get exposed to aluminum , mercury , formaldehyde and foreign cell proteins but we may get simian virus 40 and other dangerous viruses which can cause cancer , leukemia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine pool is contaminated due to careless animal isolation techniques .
Congress has protected the manufacturers from lawsuits , so dangerous vaccines simply increase profits at no risk to the drug companies .
U.S. children aged 2 months began receiving hepatitis B vaccine in December 2000.No peer-reviewed studies of the safety of hepatitis B in this age bracket had been done .
Over 36,000 adverse reactions with 440 deaths were soon reported but the true incidence is much higher as reporting is voluntary so only approximately 10 % of adverse reactions get reported @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are dying annually from the hepatitis B vaccine .
The CDC ’ s Chief of Epidemiology admits that the frequency of serious reactions to hepatitis B vaccine is 10 times higher than other vaccines .
Hepatitis B is transmitted sexually and by contaminated blood , so the incidence of this disease must be near zero in this age bracket .
A vaccine expert , Dr. Philip Incao , states that “ the conclusion is obvious that the risks [ 18 ] of hepatitis B vaccination far outweigh the benefits .
Once a vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ longer liable for adverse reactions .
Dr. W.B .
Clarke ’ s important observation that cancer was not found in unvaccinated individuals demands an explanation and one now appears forthcoming .
All vaccines given over a short period of time to an immature immune system deplete the thymus gland ( the primary gland involved in immune reactions ) of irreplaceable immature immune cells .
Each of these cells could have multiplied and developed into an army of valuable cells to combat infection and growth of abnormal cells .
When these immune cells have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not appear .
The Arthur Research Foundation in Tucson , Arizona estimates that up to 60 % of our immune system may be exhausted [ 19 ] by multiple mass vaccines ( 36 are now required for children ) .
Only 10 % of immune cells are permanently lost when a child is permitted to develop natural immunity from disease .
There needs to be grave concern about these immune system injuring vaccinations !
Could the persons who approve these mass vaccinations know that they are impairing the health of these children , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ requiring much medical care in the future ?
Compelling evidence is available that the development of the immune system after contracting the usual childhood diseases matures and renders it capable to fight infection and malignant cells in the future .
The use of multiple vaccines , which prevents natural immunity , promotes the development of allergies and asthma .
A New Zealand study disclosed that 23 % of vaccinated children develop asthma , as compared to zero in unvaccinated children .
Cancer was a very rare illness in the 1890 ’ s .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccinating affords a plausible explanation for Dr. Clarke ’ s finding that only vaccinated individuals got cancer .
Some radical adverse change in health occurred in the early 1900s to permit cancer to explode and vaccinating appears to be the reason .
Vaccines are an unnatural phenomena .
My guess is that if enough persons said no to immunizations there would be a striking improvement in general health with nature back in the immunizing business instead of man .
Having a child vaccinated should be a choice not a requirement .
Medical and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
When governmental policies require vaccinations before children enter schools coercion has overruled the lack of evidence of vaccine efficacy and safety .
There is no proof that vaccines work and they are never studied for safety before release .
My opinion is that there is overwhelming evidence that vaccines are dangerous and the only reason for their existence is to increase profits of pharmaceutical firms .
If you are forced to immunize your children so they can enter school , obtain a notarized statement from the director of the facility that they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adverse reaction from the vaccine .
Since there is at least a 2 percent risk of a serious adverse reaction they may be smart enough to permit your child to escape a dangerous procedure .
Recent legislation passed by Congress gives the government the power to imprison persons refusing to take vaccines ( smallpox , anthrax , etc ) .
This would be troublesome to enforce if large numbers of citizens declined to be vaccinated at the same time .
1 Null Gary Vaccination : An Analysis of the Health Risks- Part Townsend @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pg 78 2 Mullins Eustace Murder by Injection pg 132 The National Council for Medical Research , P. O .
Box 1105 , Staunton , Virginia 24401 3 Gary Null Interview with Dr. Dean Black April 7 , 1995 4 de Melker HE , et al Pertussis in the Netherlands : an outbreak despite high levels of immunization with whole-cell vaccine Emerging Infectious Diseases 1997 ; 3 ( 2 ) : 175-8 Centers for Disease Control 5 Gary Null Interview with Walene James , April 6 , 1995 6 Torch WS Diptheria-pertussis-tetanus ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the sudden infant death syndrome ( SIDS ) Neurology 1982 ; 32-4 A169 abstract .
7 Collin Jonathan The Townsend Letter for Doctors & Patients 1988 abstracted in Horowitz L. Emerging Viruses Aids & Ebola pg 1-5 8 Harris RJ et al Contaminant viruses in two live vaccines produced in chick cells.J Hyg ( London ) 1966 Mar:64 ( 1 ) : 1-7 9 Horowitz Leonard G. Emerging Viruses AIDS & Ebola pg 484 10 Vilchez RA et al Association between simian virus 40 and non-Hodgekin lymphoma Lancet 2002 Mar 9 ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ X A study of simian virus 40 infection and its origin in human brain tumors Zhonghu Liu Xing Bing Xue Zhi 2000 Feb ; 21 ( 1 ) :19-21 12 Friedrich F. et al temporal association between the isolation of Sabin-related poliovirus vaccine strains and the Guillan-Barre syndrome Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 1996 Jan-Feb ; 38 ( 1 ) :55-8 13 Horowitz Leonard Emerging Viruses : Aids and Ebola pg 492 14 Horowitz Leonard G Emerging Viruses : Aids & Ebola pg 378-88 Tetrahedron Inc. Suite 147 , 206 North 4th @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tetrahedron.org 15 Null , Gary Vaccination : An Anatysis of the health risks-Part 3 Townsend letter for doctors & patients Dec. 2003 pg 78 16 Classen , JB et al .
Association between type 1 diabetes and Hib vaccine BMJ 1999 ; 319:1133 17 Brain 9/01 18 Incao , philip M.D .
Letter to representative Dale Van Vyven , Ohio House of Representatives March 1 , 1999 provided to www.garynull.com by The Natural Immunity Information Network 19 Rowen Robert Your first consultation with Dr. Rowen pg 20 About the author : Dr. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ specialist in internal medicine who spent 34 years caring for office and hospital patients .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Why You Are Safer to Avoid Taking Vaccines
Written by Dr. James Howenstine, MD
Cowpox vaccine was believed able to immunize people against smallpox. At the time this vaccine was introduced, there was already a decline in the number of cases of smallpox. Japan introduced compulsory vaccination in 1872. In 1892 there were 165,774 cases of smallpox with 29,979 deaths despite the vaccination program.
A stringent compulsory smallpox vaccine program, which prosecuted those refusing the vaccine, was instituted in England in 1867. Within 4 years 97.5 % of persons between 2 and 50 had been vaccinated. The following year England experienced the worst smallpox epidemic[1] in its history with 44,840 deaths. Between 1871 and 1880 the incidence of smallpox escalated from 28 to 46 per 100,000. The smallpox vaccine does not work.
Much of the success attributed to vaccination programs may actually have been due to improvement in public health related to water quality and sanitation, less crowded living conditions, better nutrition, and higher standards of living. Typically the incidence of a disease was clearly declining before the vaccine for that disease was introduced. In England the incidence of polio had decreased by 82 % before the polio vaccine was introduced in 1956.
In the early 1900s an astute Indiana physician, Dr. W.B. Clarke, stated “Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with cowpox vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with two hundred cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated[2] person.”
There is a widely held belief that vaccines should not be criticized because the public might refuse to take them. This is valid only if the benefits exceed the known risks of the vaccines.
Do Vaccines Actually Prevent Disease?
This important question does not appear to have ever been adequately studied. Vaccines are enormously profitable for drug companies and recent legislation in the U.S. has exempted lawsuits against pharmaceutical firms in the event of adverse reactions to vaccines which are very common. In 1975 Germany stopped requiring pertussis (whooping cough) vaccination. Today less than 10 % of German children are vaccinated against pertussis. The number of cases of pertussis has steadily decreased[3] even though far fewer children are receiving pertussis vaccine.
Measles outbreaks have occurred in schools with vaccination rates over 98 % in all parts of the U.S. including areas that had reported no cases of measles for years. As measles immunization rates rise to high levels measles becomes a disease seen only in vaccinated persons. An outbreak of measles occurred in a school where 100 % of the children had been vaccinated. Measles mortality rates had declined by 97 % in England before measles vaccination was instituted.
In 1986 there were 1300 cases of pertussis in Kansas and 90 % of these cases occurred in children who had been adequately vaccinated. Similar vaccine failures have been reported from Nova Scotia where pertussis continues to be occurring despite universal vaccination. Pertussis remains endemic[4] in the Netherlands where for more than 20 years 96 % of children have received 3 pertussis shots by age 12 months.
After institution of diptheria vaccination in England and Wales in 1894 the number of deaths from diptheria rose by 20 % in the subsequent 15 years. Germany had compulsory vaccination in 1939. The rate of diptheria spiraled to 150,000 cases that year whereas, Norway which did not have compulsory vaccination, had only 50 cases of diptheria the same year.
The continued presence of these infectious diseases in children who have received vaccines proves that life long immunity which follows natural infection does not occur in persons receiving vaccines. The injection process places the viral particles into the blood without providing any clear way to eliminate these foreign substances.
Why Do Vaccines Fail To Protect Against Diseases?
Walene James, author of Immunization: the Reality Behind The Myth, states that the full[5] inflammatory response is necessary to create real immunity. Prior to the introduction of measles and mumps vaccines children got measles and mumps and in the great majority of cases these diseases were benign. Vaccines “trick” the body so it does not mount a complete inflammatory response to the injected virus.
Vaccines and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome SIDS
The incidence of Sudden Infant Death syndrome SIDS has grown from .55 per 1000 live births in 1953 to 12.8 per 1000 in 1992 in Olmstead County, Minnesota. The peak incidence for SIDS is age 2 to 4 months the exact time most vaccines are being given to children. 85 % of cases of SIDS occur in the first 6 months of infancy. The increase in SIDS as a percentage of total infant deaths has risen from 2.5 per 1000 in 1953 to 17.9 per 1000 in 1992. This rise in SIDS deaths has occurred during a period when nearly every childhood disease was declining due to improved sanitation and medical progress except SIDS. These deaths from SIDS did increase during a period when the number of vaccines given a child was steadily rising to 36 per child.
Dr. W. Torch was able to document 12 deaths in infants which appeared within 3½ and 19 hours of a DPT immunization. He later reported 11 new cases of SIDS death and one near miss which had occurred within 24 hours of a DPT injection. When he studied 70 cases of SIDS two thirds of these victims[6] had been vaccinated from one half day to 3 weeks prior to their deaths. None of these deaths was attributed to vaccines. Vaccines are a sacred cow and nothing against them appears in the mass media because they are so profitable to pharmaceutical firms.
There is valid reason to think that not only are vaccines worthless in preventing disease they are counterproductive because they injure the immune system permitting cancer, auto-immune diseases and SIDS to cause much disability and death.
Are Vaccines Sterile?
Dr. Robert Strecker claimed that the department of defense DOD was given $10,000,000 in 1969 to create the AIDS virus to be used as a population-reducing[7] weapon against blacks. By use of the Freedom of Information Act Dr. Strecker was able to learn that the DOD secured funds from Congress to perform studies on immune destroying agents for germ warfare.
Once produced, the vaccine was given in two locations. Smallpox vaccine containing HIV was given to 100,000,000 Africans in 1977. Over 2000 young white homosexual males in New York City were given Hepatitis B vaccine that contained HIV virus in 1978. This vaccine was given at New York City Blood Center. The Hepatitis B vaccine containing the HIV virus was also administered to homosexual males in San Francisco, Los Angeles, St.Louis, Houston and Chicago in 1978 and 1979. U.S. Public Health epidemiology studies have disclosed that these same 6 cities had the highest incidence of AIDS, Aids related Complex (ARC) and deaths rates from HIV, when compared to other U.S. cities.
When a new virus is introduced into a community. It takes 20 years for the number of cases to double. If the fabricated story that green monkey bites of pygmies led to the HIV epidemic, the alleged monkey bites in the 1940s should have produced a peak in the incidence of HIV in the 1960s at which time HIV was non existent in Africa. The World Health Organization (WHO) began a African smallpox vaccination campaign in 1977 that targeted urban population centers and avoided pygmies. If the green monkey bites of pygmies truly caused the HIV epidemic the incidence of HIV in pygmies should have been higher than in urban citizens. However, the opposite was true.
In 1954 Dr. Bernice Eddy (bacteriologist) discovered live monkey viruses in supposedly sterile inactivated polio vaccine[8] developed by Dr. Jonas Salk. This discovery was not well received at the NIH and Dr. Eddy was demoted. Later Dr. Eddy, working with Sarah Stewart, discovered SE polyoma virus. This virus was quite important because it caused cancer in every animal receiving it.
Yellow fever vaccine had previously been found to contain avian (bird) leukemia virus. Later Dr. Hilleman isolated SV 40 virus from both the Salk and Sabin polio vaccines. There were 40 different viruses[9] in these polio vaccines they were trying to eradicate. They were never able to get rid of these viruses ontaminating the polio vaccines. The SV 40 virus causes malignancies. It has now been identified in 43 % of cases of non-Hodgekin lymphoma[10] , 36 % of brain tumors[11] , 18 % of healthy blood samples, and 22 % of healthy semen samples, mesothiolomas and other malignancies.
By the time of this discovery SV 40 had already been injected into 10,000,000 people in Salk vaccine. Gastric digestion inactivtes some of SV 40 in Sabin vaccine. However, the isolation of strains of Sabin polio vaccine from all 38 cases of Guillan Barre Syndrome[12] GBS in Brazil suggests that significant numbers of persons are able to be infected from this vaccine. All 38 of these patients had received Sabin polio vaccine months to years before the onset of GBS. The incidence of non-Hodgekin lymphoma has”mysteriouly” doubled since the 1970s.
Dr. John Martin, Professor of Pathology at the Univ. of Southern California, was employed by the Viral Oncology Branch of the Bureau of Biologics (FDA) from 1976 to 1980. While employed there he identified foreign DNA in the live polio vaccine Orimune Lederle that suggested serious vaccine contamination. He warned his supervisors about this problem and was told to discontinue his work as it was outside the scope of testing required for polio vaccine.
Later Dr. Martin learned that all eleven of the African green monkeys used to grow the Lederle polio virus Orimune had grown simian cytomegalovirus from kidney cell cultures. Lederle was aware of this viral contamination as their Cytomegaloviral Contamination Plan[13] clearly showed in 1972. The Bureau of Biologics decided not to pursue the matter so production of infected polio vaccine continued.
In 1955 Dr. Martin identified unique cell destroying viruses termed stealth viruses in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. These viruses lacked genes that would enable the immune system to recognize them. Thus they were protected by the body’s failure to develop antiviral antibodies. In March of 1995, Dr. Martin learned that some of these stealth viruses had originated from African green monkey simian cytomegalovirus of a type known to infect man.
The Lederle vaccine experience suggests that the higher-ups are not concerned about sloppy and dangerous preparation of vaccines. Animal cross infection is a huge unsolved current problem for all vaccine manufacturing. If this vaccine production sounds like an unbelievable mess to you, you are right.
The influential Club of Rome has a position paper in which they state that the world population is too large and needs to be reduced by 90 %. This means that 6 billion people must be reduced to 500 to 600 million. Obviously, creating famines and genocidal wars such as wrecked havoc in Africa, and loosing new laboratory-created diseases (HIV, Ebola, Marburg[14] , and probably West Nile virus and SARS) can help reduce the population. Other elitist groups (Trilaterals, Bildenbergers) have expressed similar concerns about excess people on planet Earth.
The company that was projected to produce the new smallpox vaccine in the U.S. was in serious trouble in England because of unsatisfactory quality of operations before setting up their facility in the U.S. Why would their performance here be any better than it was in England?
If there are important powerful groups of people that are determined to reduce the world population, what could be a more diabolically clever way to eliminate people than to inject them with a cancer-causing vaccine? The person receiving the injection would never suspect that the vaccine taken 10 to 15 years earlier had caused the cancer to appear.
Other Dangers From Vaccines
In the March 4, 1977 issue of Science Jonas and Darrell Salk warn, “Live virus vaccines against influenza or poliomyelitis may in each instance produce the disease it intended to prevent. The live virus against measles and mumps may produce such side effects as encephalitis (brain damage).
The swine flu vaccine was administered to the American public even though there had never been a case of swine flu identified in a human. Farmers refused to use the vaccine because it killed too many animals. Within a few months of use in humans this vaccine caused many cases of serious nerve injury (Guillan Barre syndrome).
An article in the Washington Post on Jan. 26, 1988 mentioned that all cases of polio since 1979 had been caused by the polio vaccine with no known cases of polio from a wild strain since 1979. This might have created a perfect situation to discontinue the vaccine, but the vaccine is still given. Vaccines are a wonderful source of profits with no risks to the drug companies since vaccine injuries are now recompensed by the government.
The steady escalation in the number of vaccines administered has been followed by an identical rise in the incidence of auto-immune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, subacute lupus erythematosus, psoriasis, multiple sclerosis, asthma) seen in children. While there is a genetic transmission of some of these diseases many are probably due to the injury from foreign protein particles, mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde and other toxic agents injected in vaccines.
In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine was recommended by the Center for Disease Control for all infants. When this vaccine program was instituted several infants died and many had life endangering bowel obstructions. Prelicensure trials[15] of the rotavirus vaccine had demonstrated an increased incidence of intussusception 30 times greater than normal but the vaccine was released anyway without special warnings to practitioners to be on the lookout for bowel problems. Children’s vaccines are often not studied for toxicity possibly because such study might eliminate them from being used.
A large study from Australia showed that the risk of developing encephalitis from the pertussis vaccine was 5 times greater than the risk of developing encephalitis by contacting pertussis by natural methods.
Naturally acquired immunity by illness evolves by spread of a virus from the respiratory tract to the liver, thymus, spleen, and bone marrow. When symptoms begin, the entire immune response has been mobilized to repel the invading virus. This complex immune system response creates antibodies that confer life long immunity against that invading virus and prepares the child to respond promptly to an infection by the same virus in the future.
Vaccination, in contrast, results in the persisting of live virus or other foreign antigens within the cells of the body, a situation that may provoke auto-immune reactions as the body attempts to destroy its own infected cells. There is no surprise that the incidence of auto-immune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, subacute lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, asthma, psoriasis) has risen sharply in this era of multiple vaccine immunization.
Vaccine Induced Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Dr. John Classen has published 29 articles on vaccine-induced[16] diabetes. At least 8 of 10 children with Type 1 (insulin needing) diabetes have this disease as a result of vaccination. These children may have avoided measles, mumps, and whooping cough but they have received something far worse: an illness that shortens life expectancy by 10 to 15 years and results in a life requiring constant medical care.
Dr. Classen has shown in Finland, the introduction of hemophilus type b vaccine caused three times as many cases of type 1 diabetes as the number of deaths and brain damage from hemophilus influenza type b it might have prevented.
In New Zealand, the incidence of Type 1 diabetes in children rose by 61 % after an aggressive vaccine program against hepatitis B.. This same program has been started in the U.S.A. so we can now look forward to many cases of Type 1 diabetes in children. Similar rises in Type 1 diabetes have been seen in England, Italy, Sweden, and Denmark after immunization programs against Hepatitis B.
Toxic Substances Are Needed To Make Vaccines.
Vaccines contain many toxic substances that are needed to prevent the vaccines from becoming infected or to improve the performance of the vaccine. Among these substances are mercury, formaldehyde and aluminum.[17]
In the past 10 years, the number of autistic children has risen from between 200 and 500 percent in every state in the U.S. This sharp rise in autism followed the introduction of measles, mumps and rubella vaccine in 1975.
Representative Dan Burton’s healthy grandson was given injections for 9 diseases in one day. These injections were instantly followed by autism. These injections contain a preservative of mercury called thimerosal. The boy received 41 times the amount of mercury which is capable of harm to the body. Mercury is a neurotoxin that can injure the brain and nervous system. And tragically, it did.
In the United States the number of compulsory vaccine injections has increased from 10 to 36 in the last 25 years. During this period, there has been a simultaneous increase in the number of children suffering learning disabilities and attention deficit disorder. Some of these childhood disabilities are related to intrauterine cerebral damage from maternal cocaine use, but probably vaccines cause many of the others.
Many vaccines contain aluminum. A new disease called macrophagic myofasciitis causes pain in muscles, bones and joints. All persons with this disease have received aluminum containing vaccines. Deposits of aluminum are able to remain as an irritant in tissues and disturb the immune and nervous system for a lifetime.
Nearly all vaccines contain aluminum and mercury. These metals appear to play an important role in the etiology of Alzheimer’s Disease. An expert at the 1997 International Vaccine Conference related that a person who takes 5 or more annual flu vaccine shots has increased the likelihood of developing Alzheimer’s Disease by a factor of 10 over the person who has had 2 or fewer flu shots.
When we take vaccines we are playing a modern version of Russian Roulette. We not only get exposed to aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde and foreign cell proteins but we may get simian virus 40 and other dangerous viruses which can cause cancer, leukemia and other severe health problems because the vaccine pool is contaminated due to careless animal isolation techniques. Congress has protected the manufacturers from lawsuits, so dangerous vaccines simply increase profits at no risk to the drug companies.
U.S. children aged 2 months began receiving hepatitis B vaccine in December 2000.No peer-reviewed studies of the safety of hepatitis B in this age bracket had been done. Over 36,000 adverse reactions with 440 deaths were soon reported but the true incidence is much higher as reporting is voluntary so only approximately 10 % of adverse reactions get reported.
This means that about 5000 infants are dying annually from the hepatitis B vaccine. The CDC’s Chief of Epidemiology admits that the frequency of serious reactions to hepatitis B vaccine is 10 times higher than other vaccines. Hepatitis B is transmitted sexually and by contaminated blood, so the incidence of this disease must be near zero in this age bracket.
A vaccine expert, Dr. Philip Incao, states that “the conclusion is obvious that the risks[18] of hepatitis B vaccination far outweigh the benefits. Once a vaccine is mandated the vaccine manufacturer is no longer liable for adverse reactions.
Dr. W.B. Clarke’s important observation that cancer was not found in unvaccinated individuals demands an explanation and one now appears forthcoming. All vaccines given over a short period of time to an immature immune system deplete the thymus gland (the primary gland involved in immune reactions) of irreplaceable immature immune cells. Each of these cells could have multiplied and developed into an army of valuable cells to combat infection and growth of abnormal cells.
When these immune cells have been used up, permanent immunity may not appear. The Arthur Research Foundation in Tucson, Arizona estimates that up to 60 % of our immune system may be exhausted[19] by multiple mass vaccines (36 are now required for children). Only 10 % of immune cells are permanently lost when a child is permitted to develop natural immunity from disease.
There needs to be grave concern about these immune system injuring vaccinations! Could the persons who approve these mass vaccinations know that they are impairing the health of these children, many of whom are being doomed to requiring much medical care in the future?
Compelling evidence is available that the development of the immune system after contracting the usual childhood diseases matures and renders it capable to fight infection and malignant cells in the future.
The use of multiple vaccines, which prevents natural immunity, promotes the development of allergies and asthma. A New Zealand study disclosed that 23 % of vaccinated children develop asthma , as compared to zero in unvaccinated children.
Cancer was a very rare illness in the 1890’s. This evidence about immune system injury from vaccinating affords a plausible explanation for Dr. Clarke’s finding that only vaccinated individuals got cancer. Some radical adverse change in health occurred in the early 1900s to permit cancer to explode and vaccinating appears to be the reason.
Vaccines are an unnatural phenomena. My guess is that if enough persons said no to immunizations there would be a striking improvement in general health with nature back in the immunizing business instead of man. Having a child vaccinated should be a choice not a requirement. Medical and religious exemptions are permitted by most states.
When governmental policies require vaccinations before children enter schools coercion has overruled the lack of evidence of vaccine efficacy and safety. There is no proof that vaccines work and they are never studied for safety before release. My opinion is that there is overwhelming evidence that vaccines are dangerous and the only reason for their existence is to increase profits of pharmaceutical firms.
If you are forced to immunize your children so they can enter school, obtain a notarized statement from the director of the facility that they will accept full financial responsibility for any adverse reaction from the vaccine. Since there is at least a 2 percent risk of a serious adverse reaction they may be smart enough to permit your child to escape a dangerous procedure.
Recent legislation passed by Congress gives the government the power to imprison persons refusing to take vaccines (smallpox, anthrax, etc). This would be troublesome to enforce if large numbers of citizens declined to be vaccinated at the same time.
Footnotes:
1 Null Gary Vaccination: An Analysis of the Health Risks- Part Townsend Letter for Doctors & Patients Dec. 2003 pg 78
2 Mullins Eustace Murder by Injection pg 132 The National Council for Medical Research, P. O. Box 1105, Staunton, Virginia 24401
3 Gary Null Interview with Dr. Dean Black April 7, 1995
4 de Melker HE, et al Pertussis in the Netherlands: an outbreak despite high levels of immunization with whole-cell vaccine Emerging Infectious Diseases 1997; 3(2): 175-8 Centers for Disease Control
5 Gary Null Interview with Walene James, April 6, 1995
6 Torch WS Diptheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) immunizations: a potential cause of the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) Neurology 1982; 32-4 A169 abstract.
7 Collin Jonathan The Townsend Letter for Doctors & Patients 1988 abstracted in Horowitz L. Emerging Viruses Aids & Ebola pg 1-5
8 Harris RJ et al Contaminant viruses in two live vaccines produced in chick cells.J Hyg (London) 1966 Mar:64(1) : 1-7
9 Horowitz Leonard G. Emerging Viruses AIDS & Ebola pg 484
10 Vilchez RA et al Association between simian virus 40 and non-Hodgekin lymphoma Lancet 2002 Mar 9;359(9309):817-823
11 Bu X A study of simian virus 40 infection and its origin in human brain tumors Zhonghu Liu Xing Bing Xue Zhi 2000 Feb;21 (1):19-21
12 Friedrich F. et al temporal association between the isolation of Sabin-related poliovirus vaccine strains and the Guillan-Barre syndrome Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 1996 Jan-Feb; 38(1):55-8
13 Horowitz Leonard Emerging Viruses: Aids and Ebola pg 492
14 Horowitz Leonard G Emerging Viruses: Aids & Ebola pg 378-88 Tetrahedron Inc. Suite 147, 206 North 4th Ave. Sandpoint, Idaho 83864 1-888-508-4787 [email protected]
15 Null, Gary Vaccination: An Anatysis of the health risks-Part 3 Townsend letter for doctors & patients Dec. 2003 pg 78
16 Classen, JB et al. Association between type 1 diabetes and Hib vaccine BMJ 1999; 319:1133
17 Brain 9/01
18 Incao, philip M.D. Letter to representative Dale Van Vyven, Ohio House of Representatives March 1, 1999 provided to www.garynull.com by The Natural Immunity Information Network
19 Rowen Robert Your first consultation with Dr. Rowen pg 20
Read more at newswithviews.com
About the author: Dr. James A. Howenstine is a board certified specialist in internal medicine who spent 34 years caring for office and hospital patients.
***
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-07-30--Deputy Chief Medical Officer for England: “Masks Not a Good Idea”

On wearing a face mask against COVID-19 : “ For the average member of the public walking down a street , it is not a good idea , ” says Jenny Harries OBE , Deputy Chief Medical Officer for England .
Members of the public could be putting themselves more at risk from contracting coronavirus by wearing face masks , one of England ’ s most senior doctors has warned .
Jenny Harries , deputy chief medical officer , said the masks could “ actually trap the virus ” and cause the person wearing it to breathe it in .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ public walking down a street , it is not a good idea ” to wear a face mask in the hope of preventing infection , she added .
This is because people wear the same mask over and over and over again , lay it down on unsanitary surfaces , and fiddle with it while wearing it .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

Deputy Chief Medical Officer for England: “Masks Not a Good Idea”
Written by The Independent
On wearing a face mask against COVID-19: “For the average member of the public walking down a street, it is not a good idea,” says Jenny Harries OBE, Deputy Chief Medical Officer for England.
Members of the public could be putting themselves more at risk from contracting coronavirus by wearing face masks, one of England’s most senior doctors has warned.
Jenny Harries, deputy chief medical officer, said the masks could “actually trap the virus” and cause the person wearing it to breathe it in.
“For the average member of the public walking down a street, it is not a good idea” to wear a face mask in the hope of preventing infection, she added.
This is because people wear the same mask over and over and over again, lay it down on unsanitary surfaces, and fiddle with it while wearing it.
Read more at www.independent.co.uk
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-07-30--A ‘wrongful conviction’ in the climate change case?

A large part of the population believes that science on climate change is settled , and that serious climate scientists are all in agreement : A weak-sense consensus climate change view is probably supported by 97-98 % of scientists ( as well as this author ) : • One manifestation of such change was a global mean surface temperature ( GMST ) increase over the last 50 years • The atmospheric proportion of many important greenhouse gasses – such as CO – have increased over the same period • An increase in atmospheric ‘ greenhouse gasses ’ will cause at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of energy retained by the Earth .
These bullets are scientifically supportable , as each of the above statements is falsifiable : any scientists contending that GMST has not increased can enter into a – likely fruitless – debate with NASA , whose high-quality data set has been extensively peer-reviewed .
The weak-sense view is distinctly different from the strong-sense climate change view supported by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( IPCC ) , as well as many climate scientists , politicians and news outlets .
A typical IPCC summary of this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century ” A possible ambiguity between which version is supported by 97-98 % of the scientists is clarified by the Wikipedia reference to a 2010 article claiming it is the strong-sense , IPCC view that is the consensus view .
So apparently the case is closed , and the guilty party – CO – tried and convicted , and the vast majority of climate scientists are nodding in agreement .
This despite numerous senior scientists : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of greenhouse gasses in climate change has been greatly over-stated ( just check the Publications tab at www.principia-scientific.org ) .
The Wikipedia page unfortunately remains unmodified , and continues to suggest that this consensus supports the idea that anthropogenic climate change has been proven to the accepted doctrine status achieved by such theories as Evolution , Continental Drift or Heliocentrism .
The “ consensus ” has in turn been seized upon by the news outlets and politicians , and has led to a huge dedication of resources to reduce or limit atmospheric CO @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of dollars without the full backing of the scientific community .
A worrying by-product of the adoption of the strong-sense view by the non-scientific community has been a growing cancel culture in the climate sciences : authors not on-board the consensus train will not be published by many of the leading scientific journals in order to prolong the consensus myth .
This pressure to conform in turn leads to further strong-sense consensus , as non-conformist articles never reach the publication review stage , and non-conformist scientists often incur severe negative social and professional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ progress in Science comes from challenging traditional wisdom , and that such challenge should be welcomed not shunned : it ’ s why conference presentations are followed by a Q & A session , and why articles suffer extensive peer-review .
If a well-posed question or a new data analysis can upset a scientific apple-cart then the apple-cart probably wasn ’ t very stable .
Knowledge progress is evolutionary , with many theories such as Evolution , Continental Drift , K-T Meteorite Impact , etc .
initially being openly mocked by “ consensus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scientific doctrine after a long , arduous , peer-reviewed suite of ever-progressing evidence and analysis .
The null hypothesis and the concept of falsification has been central to this scientific progress ( https : //principia-scientific.com/psi-mission-statement/ ) .
For example , a falsifiable null hypothesis in the Evolution sciences might state “ The Human genome does not resemble the Chimpanzee genome ” .
Inferential statistics can be used to test whether this null hypothesis should be rejected , for example if the evaluated probability of the hypothesis being true is lower than a selected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or 0.01 ) .
If such a test fails to reject the hypothesis ( p > 0.05 ) , then such a test does not confirm the null hypothesis – a null hypothesis is never accepted – but implies that insufficient evidence supports the rejection of the hypothesis .
In law terms : one can be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt , but one ’ s innocence can never be fully proven , as one can not prove a negative .
The most recent , authoritative and comprehensive set of reports on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( https : //www.ipcc.ch/reports/ ) , who support a strong-sense anthropogenic climate change view .
The IPCC recognize 4 main climate “ forcings ” , physical processes that potentially cause climate change : 2 Anthropogenic ( Radiative Forcing due to GreenHouse Gasses ( RFGHG ) and Other Anthropogenic ( OA ) ) , and 2 Natural ( Solar Irradiation Forcing and Volcanic Forcing ) .
The relative climate change contributions of the Natural and Anthropogenic forcings are determined using the Optimal Fingerprint methodology , whereby each forcing ’ s simulated contribution – its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – are compared to observed trends .
Climate models initially simulate the response to each forcing separately , after which the modeled responses are individually scaled , and then linearly combined – using new scaling factors – to calculate the overall model response .
Note that the IPCC climate model outputs require scaling factors , as they – as a rule – do not generate physically accurate temperature or energy responses to the forcings .
As the IPCC notes : “ Attribution does not require , and nor does it imply , that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ causal factor in question is simulated correctly ” 2 .
Instead , the IPCC look for the “ fingerprints ” of the forcings in the trends of the data , e.g .
an increasing trend in GMST since 1980 concurs with an increasing trend in CO over the same period .
The climate model output is scaled using whatever factor is necessary to mimic the observations .
Which means the IPCC comment “ GHG attribution is based on the consistency of observed and modeled changes across the climate system ” 2 is somewhat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been conditioned by scaling factors that were selected to ensure this match : models do not simulate the magnitude of Anthropogenic Forcing in a physically correct manner unless the Anthropogenic scaling factor is close to 1 .
In practice ( Bindoff at al .
2 , Fig .
10.4 ; note scaling factors limited to the -2 and 2 interval ) the Anthropogenic and Natural scaling factors show a worrying range of [ -2,2 ] or larger : • A scaling factor of 2 implies the climate model only predicts half the magnitude @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scaling factor of 0 implies that the climate model simulates a change in the variable that is not observed • A scaling factor of -2 implies that the climate model is off in both magnitude and direction , e.g .
a small increase was forecast , but a big decrease observed .
The IPCC attribution studies extensively ( although implicitly ) evaluate two competing null hypotheses : • A Natural null hypothesis , N : there is no relationship between observed data and the Natural Forcing • An Anthropogenic null hypothesis , A @ @ @ @ @ @ @ data and the Anthropogenic Forcing A lengthy and comprehensive IPCC evaluation of N leads to the conclusion2 that it can not be rejected , i.e .
numerous attribution studies fail to detect the Natural Forcing trends in the observed data trends .
This leads to such main conclusions as : “ overall , we conclude that it is extremely unlikely that the contribution from solar forcing to the warming since 1950 was larger than that from GHGs.
” Simply put : since 1950 , the Natural Forcing has remained relatively constant , GMST @ @ @ @ @ @ @ RFGHG , the only forcing whose trends match the significant GMST increase in the time frame .
Note that the A null hypothesis is rejected by default , i.e .
by comparing the relative contributions of the Natural and Anthropogenic forcings , and concluding that if climate change is not due to Natural Forcing then it must be due to Anthropogenic Forcing .
This forms the most important distinction between the IPCC attribution method and the traditional scientific method : the central ( A ) null hypothesis is not rejected based on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an extensive evaluation of a competing null hypothesis , i.e .
by in essence accepting the N null hypothesis .
In law terms : there are two possible suspects , IPCC extensively demonstrate that the evidence clears once of the suspects , therefore it must be the other suspect ; IPCC have demonstrated the innocence of the Natural Forcing , and therefore want a guilty verdict for Anthropogenic Forcing .
Many of the recent articles disputing the role of greenhouse gasses in climate change focus on the “ innocence ” of CO in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a significant body of evidence that the role of CO in the IPCC climate models is overstated , they essentially fall into the same trap of trying to “ prove ” innocence , i.e .
the acceptance the A null hypothesis .
Anyone who follows the trials and tribulations of the Innocence Project knows that the road to innocence – once a suspect is publicly convicted – is long and arduous .
Police work can suffer from similar problems : detectives occasionally narrow their list of suspects too quickly , leading to an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that – while not a good fit – can be presented in a convincing manner to a jury .
Legal defense teams can opt for proving a null hypothesis – “ There is no relationship between our client and the crime ” – but as stated above it is very hard to prove a negative .
Defense teams therefore often opt for a different approach , the SODDI defense : some other dude did it .
A SODDI defense focuses on rejecting a null hypothesis stating “ There is no relationship between some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suggesting the evidence better fits the other dude .
Returning to the climate change debate , the IPCC climate models often can not reproduce observed data trends , i.e .
the simulated Anthropogenic Forcing output often poorly fits the observations .
The IPCC generally acknowledge these mismatches : for example , they state that Such mismatches between simulated and observed GMST and Global Upper Ocean Heat Content ( GUOHC ) trends provide clues to unrecognized – and therefore unmodeled – climate change forcings , i.e .
the “ fingerprints ” of the true @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) : the late 1950 ’ s GUOHC increase , the 1965-1968 GUOHC decrease , the 1969-1974 GUOHC increase , the 1900-1945 increase of GMST & GUOHC , the 1945-1970 decrease of GMST & GUOHC FP2 ) An acceleration of ocean heating around 1980 .
& a sharp increase in GMST & GUOHC since the late 1990 ’ s .
FP3 ) : IPCC climate models over-predict atmospheric heating , and therefore the role of RFGHG in heating the oceans .
FP4 ) : The Southern hemisphere is heating less than the Northern @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Northern ) Atlantic Ocean is heating more than the Pacific during the 1900-1945 and the 1970-2020 periods of global warming .
A full detailing of these and other fingerprints can be found in the the companion PROM paper here .
• The 6 fingerprints are caused by the same process .
The IPCC have thoroughly investigated a number of alternative processes that might cause these mismatches but have come up empty .
While it remains possible that all 6 were caused by separate , unrecognized-by-IPCC physical processes , such is extremely unlikely .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ all of the fingerprints should clearly be a favorite .
• The energy from this process is Earth-internal .
The amount of external , solar energy that reaches the earth has been extensively measured and documented .
Solar forcing has been ruled out by the IPCC attribution work : the N null hypothesis can not be rejected .
• The alternative process is not Anthropogenic .
A large GUOHC decrease occurred3 between 1958-1968 – mainly between 1965-1968 – when globally the upper 700 m layer of the oceans apparently lost almost 42 ZJ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Given that the global world energy consumption is estimated to be 0.567 ZJ ( https : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption ) , it is unlikely that humankind is directly responsible for these energy fluctuations .
• The alternative process is relatively omnipresent , constant and unremarkable .
If an alternative candidate had been obvious then one of the numerous climate scientists would have hit upon it by now .
In this regard the alternative process is to climate change what butlers are to mystery writers : butlers are ideal suspects as they go everywhere , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when the carry out their mundane work .
There is significant evidence that the alternative process ( https : //principia-scientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/vogel-prom-paper.pdf ) is the induction heating of the world ’ s oceans by the Earth ’ s varying geomagnetic field ; sceptics are encouraged to read the full PROM article .
Some parting considerations : • The Earth ’ s magnetic field is its butler .
It is omnipresent but carries out significant tasks – such as protecting the Earth from the solar wind ( en.wikipedia.org ) – without most people being aware of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ • The IPCC estimate3 that the 1971-2010 heat gain translates to roughly 0.55 W/m2 across the global ocean surface area ( 3.60 × 1014 m2 ) .
The PROM article demonstrates that this value is roughly equivalent to an average induced electromotive force requirement on the order of 2.3 mV , a surprisingly small induction heating requirement far below the detection limit of most home voltmeters .
• The Earth ’ s magnetic field ( en.wikipedia.org ) is constantly changing , e.g .
its axial dipole strength has been decreasing since the mid-17th @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can not be lost to space , so the most logical conclusion is that geomagnetic energy is being converted to heat/electricity via induction .
And even then , the Earth is composed of fairly unconducive materials , such as most naturally occurring solids and gasses , which therefore can not effectively convert magnetic energy to heat .
The salty sea water in the oceans forms a main exception .
Lastly , it would be remiss not to revisit the scientific method and the null hypothesis .
The PROM article proposes rejection of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ relationship between climate change and the geomagnetic field variability ” .
The article demonstrates a strong , statistically-significant relationship exists between the “ Yearly Distance Travelled by the North Pole ” – a proxy for geomagnetic field variability – and the Global Upper Ocean Heat Content .
The G null hypothesis can be firmly rejected ( p < 0.001 ) , signifying that any explanation of climate change needs to take a geomagnetic forcing into account , and that the A rejection-by-default can no longer hold .
And that – to the strong-sense @ @ @ @ @ @ @ really inconvenient scientific truth .
[ 1 ] IPCC , 2013 : Summary for Policymakers .
In : Climate Change 2013 : The Physical Science Basis .
Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [ Stocker , T.F.
, D. Qin , G.-K. Plattner , M. Tignor , S.K .
Allen , J. Boschung , A. Nauels , Y. Xia , V. Bex and P.M. Midgley ( eds. )
] .
[ 2 ] Bindoff , N.L.
, P.A .
Stott , K.M @ @ @ @ @ @ @ N. Gillett , D. Gutzler , K. Hansingo , G. Hegerl , Y. Hu , S. Jain , I.I .
Mokhov , J. Overland , J. Perlwitz , R. Sebbari and X. Zhang , 2013 : Detection and Attribution of Climate Change : from Global to Regional .
In : Climate Change 2013 : The Physical Science Basis .
Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [ Stocker , T.F.
, D. Qin , G.-K. Plattner , M. Tignor , S.K .
Allen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Y. Xia , V. Bex and P.M. Midgley ( eds. )
] .
Cambridge University Press , Cambridge , United Kingdom and New York , NY , USA .
[ 3 ] Rhein , M. , S.R .
Rintoul , S. Aoki , E. Campos , D. Chambers , R.A. Feely , S. Gulev , G.C .
Johnson , S.A. Josey , A. Kostianoy , C. Mauritzen , D. Roemmich , L.D .
Talley and F. Wang , 2013 : Observations : Ocean .
In : Climate Change 2013 : The Physical Science @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [ Stocker , T.F.
, D. Qin , G.-K. Plattner , M. Tignor , S.K .
Allen , J. Boschung , A. Nauels , Y. Xia , V. Bex and P.M. Midgley ( eds. )
] .
Cambridge University Press , Cambridge , United Kingdom and New York , NY , USA About the author : Koen Vogel PhD received his PhD in Geology from The Pennsylvania State University , worked in the Petroleum Industry for 25 years in a variety @ @ @ @ @ @ @ since his retirement has been engaged in pursuing his intellectual interests .
Such interests include reviewing the IPCC reports , authoring a book on Geostatistics ( currently in review ) , and editing technical proposals for start-ups .
His latest paper , ‘ The Role of Geomagnetic Induction Heating in Climate Change ’ is available for open peer review on Principia Scientific International ( please submit comments below on Koen Vogel ’ s new paper ) .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

A ‘wrongful conviction’ in the climate change case?
Written by Koen Vogel PhD
A large part of the population believes that science on climate change is settled, and that serious climate scientists are all in agreement:
“Nearly all actively publishing climate scientists (97–98%) support the consensus on anthropogenic climate change, and the remaining 3% of contrarian studies either cannot be replicated or contain errors.” [en.wikipedia.org]
A weak-sense consensus climate change view is probably supported by 97-98% of scientists (as well as this author):
The Earth’s climate is (continually) changing
One manifestation of such change was a global mean surface temperature (GMST) increase over the last 50 years
The atmospheric proportion of many important greenhouse gasses – such as CO 2 – have increased over the same period
– have increased over the same period An increase in atmospheric ‘greenhouse gasses’ will cause at least a small increase in the amount of energy retained by the Earth.
These bullets are scientifically supportable, as each of the above statements is falsifiable: any scientists contending that GMST has not increased can enter into a – likely fruitless – debate with NASA, whose high-quality data set has been extensively peer-reviewed.
The weak-sense view is distinctly different from the strong-sense climate change view supported by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), as well as many climate scientists, politicians and news outlets. A typical IPCC summary of this strong-sense view1:
“it is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century”
A possible ambiguity between which version is supported by 97-98% of the scientists is clarified by the Wikipedia reference to a 2010 article claiming it is the strong-sense, IPCC view that is the consensus view. So apparently the case is closed, and the guilty party – CO 2 – tried and convicted, and the vast majority of climate scientists are nodding in agreement. This despite numerous senior scientists:
debunking this claim ((see: principia-scientific.com)
signing open letters, e.g. to the UN (www.aei.org )
writing peer-reviewed articles claiming the role of greenhouse gasses in climate change has been greatly over-stated (just check the Publications tab at www.principia-scientific.org).
The Wikipedia page unfortunately remains unmodified, and continues to suggest that this consensus supports the idea that anthropogenic climate change has been proven to the accepted doctrine status achieved by such theories as Evolution, Continental Drift or Heliocentrism.
The “consensus” has in turn been seized upon by the news outlets and politicians, and has led to a huge dedication of resources to reduce or limit atmospheric CO 2 : one cannot justify spending billions of dollars without the full backing of the scientific community.
A worrying by-product of the adoption of the strong-sense view by the non-scientific community has been a growing cancel culture in the climate sciences: authors not on-board the consensus train will not be published by many of the leading scientific journals in order to prolong the consensus myth.
This pressure to conform in turn leads to further strong-sense consensus, as non-conformist articles never reach the publication review stage, and non-conformist scientists often incur severe negative social and professional consequences.
It bears repeating that most progress in Science comes from challenging traditional wisdom, and that such challenge should be welcomed not shunned: it’s why conference presentations are followed by a Q&A session, and why articles suffer extensive peer-review.
If a well-posed question or a new data analysis can upset a scientific apple-cart then the apple-cart probably wasn’t very stable. Knowledge progress is evolutionary, with many theories such as Evolution, Continental Drift, K-T Meteorite Impact, etc. initially being openly mocked by “consensus” detractors, and only established as scientific doctrine after a long, arduous, peer-reviewed suite of ever-progressing evidence and analysis.
The null hypothesis and the concept of falsification has been central to this scientific progress (https://principia-scientific.com/psi-mission-statement/). For example, a falsifiable null hypothesis in the Evolution sciences might state “The Human genome does not resemble the Chimpanzee genome”.
Inferential statistics can be used to test whether this null hypothesis should be rejected, for example if the evaluated probability of the hypothesis being true is lower than a selected threshold (e.g. p<0.05 or 0.01).
If such a test fails to reject the hypothesis (p>0.05), then such a test does not confirm the null hypothesis – a null hypothesis is never accepted – but implies that insufficient evidence supports the rejection of the hypothesis. In law terms: one can be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, but one’s innocence can never be fully proven, as one cannot prove a negative.
The most recent, authoritative and comprehensive set of reports on climate change was published by the IPCC (https://www.ipcc.ch/reports/), who support a strong-sense anthropogenic climate change view. The IPCC recognize 4 main climate “forcings”, physical processes that potentially cause climate change: 2 Anthropogenic (Radiative Forcing due to GreenHouse Gasses (RFGHG) and Other Anthropogenic (OA)), and 2 Natural (Solar Irradiation Forcing and Volcanic Forcing).
The relative climate change contributions of the Natural and Anthropogenic forcings are determined using the Optimal Fingerprint methodology, whereby each forcing’s simulated contribution – its estimated trends according to the climate models – are compared to observed trends.
Climate models initially simulate the response to each forcing separately, after which the modeled responses are individually scaled, and then linearly combined – using new scaling factors – to calculate the overall model response. Note that the IPCC climate model outputs require scaling factors, as they – as a rule – do not generate physically accurate temperature or energy responses to the forcings.
As the IPCC notes: “Attribution does not require, and nor does it imply, that every aspect of the response to the causal factor in question is simulated correctly”2.
Instead, the IPCC look for the “fingerprints” of the forcings in the trends of the data, e.g. an increasing trend in GMST since 1980 concurs with an increasing trend in CO 2 over the same period. The climate model output is scaled using whatever factor is necessary to mimic the observations.
Which means the IPCC comment “GHG attribution is based on the consistency of observed and modeled changes across the climate system”2 is somewhat disingenuous, as the model output has been conditioned by scaling factors that were selected to ensure this match: models do not simulate the magnitude of Anthropogenic Forcing in a physically correct manner unless the Anthropogenic scaling factor is close to 1. In practice (Bindoff at al. 2, Fig. 10.4; note scaling factors limited to the -2 and 2 interval) the Anthropogenic and Natural scaling factors show a worrying range of [-2,2] or larger:
A scaling factor of 2 implies the climate model only predicts half the magnitude of the observed change.
A scaling factor of 0 implies that the climate model simulates a change in the variable that is not observed
A scaling factor of -2 implies that the climate model is off in both magnitude and direction, e.g. a small increase was forecast, but a big decrease observed.
The IPCC attribution studies extensively (although implicitly) evaluate two competing null hypotheses:
A Natural null hypothesis, N 0 : there is no relationship between observed data and the Natural Forcing
: there is no relationship between observed data and the Natural Forcing An Anthropogenic null hypothesis, A 0 : there is no relationship between observed data and the Anthropogenic Forcing
A lengthy and comprehensive IPCC evaluation of N 0 leads to the conclusion2 that it cannot be rejected, i.e. numerous attribution studies fail to detect the Natural Forcing trends in the observed data trends.
This leads to such main conclusions as: “overall, we conclude that it is extremely unlikely that the contribution from solar forcing to the warming since 1950 was larger than that from GHGs.”
Simply put: since 1950, the Natural Forcing has remained relatively constant, GMST is increasing, therefore it must be RFGHG, the only forcing whose trends match the significant GMST increase in the time frame. Note that the A 0 null hypothesis is rejected by default, i.e. by comparing the relative contributions of the Natural and Anthropogenic forcings, and concluding that if climate change is not due to Natural Forcing then it must be due to Anthropogenic Forcing.
This forms the most important distinction between the IPCC attribution method and the traditional scientific method: the central (A 0 ) null hypothesis is not rejected based on the evidence, but largely rejected based on an extensive evaluation of a competing null hypothesis, i.e. by in essence accepting the N 0 null hypothesis.
In law terms: there are two possible suspects, IPCC extensively demonstrate that the evidence clears once of the suspects, therefore it must be the other suspect; IPCC have demonstrated the innocence of the Natural Forcing, and therefore want a guilty verdict for Anthropogenic Forcing.
Many of the recent articles disputing the role of greenhouse gasses in climate change focus on the “innocence” of CO 2 in effecting climate change: while building up a significant body of evidence that the role of CO 2 in the IPCC climate models is overstated, they essentially fall into the same trap of trying to “prove” innocence, i.e. the acceptance the A 0 null hypothesis.
Anyone who follows the trials and tribulations of the Innocence Project knows that the road to innocence – once a suspect is publicly convicted – is long and arduous. Police work can suffer from similar problems: detectives occasionally narrow their list of suspects too quickly, leading to an innocent suspect being convicted by circumstantial evidence that – while not a good fit – can be presented in a convincing manner to a jury.
Legal defense teams can opt for proving a null hypothesis – “There is no relationship between our client and the crime” – but as stated above it is very hard to prove a negative. Defense teams therefore often opt for a different approach, the SODDI defense: some other dude did it. A SODDI defense focuses on rejecting a null hypothesis stating
“There is no relationship between some other dude and the crime” by suggesting the evidence better fits the other dude. Returning to the climate change debate, the IPCC climate models often cannot reproduce observed data trends, i.e. the simulated Anthropogenic Forcing output often poorly fits the observations.
The IPCC generally acknowledge these mismatches: for example, they state that
“it is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century”1, but warn that their climate models show “differences between simulated and observed trends over periods as short as 10 to 15 years”1.
Such mismatches between simulated and observed GMST and Global Upper Ocean Heat Content (GUOHC) trends provide clues to unrecognized – and therefore unmodeled – climate change forcings, i.e. the “fingerprints” of the true guilty perpetrator(s):
FP1): the late 1950’s GUOHC increase, the 1965-1968 GUOHC decrease, the 1969-1974 GUOHC increase, the 1900-1945 increase of GMST & GUOHC, the 1945-1970 decrease of GMST & GUOHC
FP2) An acceleration of ocean heating around 1980. & a sharp increase in GMST & GUOHC since the late 1990’s.
FP3): IPCC climate models over-predict atmospheric heating, and therefore the role of RFGHG in heating the oceans.
FP4): The Southern hemisphere is heating less than the Northern hemisphere.
FP5): The (Northern) Atlantic Ocean is heating more than the Pacific during the 1900-1945 and the 1970-2020 periods of global warming.
FP6): Regional GUOHC anomalies spatially coincide with major ocean currents
A full detailing of these and other fingerprints can be found in the the companion PROM paper here.
A series of inferences limits possible alternative forcing suspects
The 6 fingerprints are caused by the same process. The IPCC have thoroughly investigated a number of alternative processes that might cause these mismatches but have come up empty. While it remains possible that all 6 were caused by separate, unrecognized-by-IPCC physical processes, such is extremely unlikely. An alternative process that causes most or all of the fingerprints should clearly be a favorite. The energy from this process is Earth-internal. The amount of external, solar energy that reaches the earth has been extensively measured and documented. Solar forcing has been ruled out by the IPCC attribution work: the N 0 null hypothesis cannot be rejected. The alternative process is not Anthropogenic. A large GUOHC decrease occurred3 between 1958-1968 – mainly between 1965-1968 – when globally the upper 700 m layer of the oceans apparently lost almost 42 ZJ; 57 ZJ was regained between 1968-1977. Given that the global world energy consumption is estimated to be 0.567 ZJ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption), it is unlikely that humankind is directly responsible for these energy fluctuations. The alternative process is relatively omnipresent, constant and unremarkable. If an alternative candidate had been obvious then one of the numerous climate scientists would have hit upon it by now. In this regard the alternative process is to climate change what butlers are to mystery writers: butlers are ideal suspects as they go everywhere, but are never noticed by the protagonists when the carry out their mundane work.
There is significant evidence that the alternative process (https://principia-scientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/vogel-prom-paper.pdf) is the induction heating of the world’s oceans by the Earth’s varying geomagnetic field; sceptics are encouraged to read the full PROM article. Some parting considerations:
The Earth’s magnetic field is its butler. It is omnipresent but carries out significant tasks – such as protecting the Earth from the solar wind (en.wikipedia.org) – without most people being aware of or directly impacted by its workings. The IPCC estimate3 that the 1971-2010 heat gain translates to roughly 0.55 W/m2 across the global ocean surface area (3.60 × 1014 m2). The PROM article demonstrates that this value is roughly equivalent to an average induced electromotive force requirement on the order of 2.3 mV, a surprisingly small induction heating requirement far below the detection limit of most home voltmeters. The Earth’s magnetic field (en.wikipedia.org) is constantly changing, e.g. its axial dipole strength has been decreasing since the mid-17th Where is this energy going? It cannot be lost to space, so the most logical conclusion is that geomagnetic energy is being converted to heat/electricity via induction. And even then, the Earth is composed of fairly unconducive materials, such as most naturally occurring solids and gasses, which therefore cannot effectively convert magnetic energy to heat. The salty sea water in the oceans forms a main exception.
Lastly, it would be remiss not to revisit the scientific method and the null hypothesis. The PROM article proposes rejection of the G 0 null hypothesis “There is no relationship between climate change and the geomagnetic field variability”. The article demonstrates a strong, statistically-significant relationship exists between the “Yearly Distance Travelled by the North Pole” – a proxy for geomagnetic field variability – and the Global Upper Ocean Heat Content.
The G 0 null hypothesis can be firmly rejected (p<0.001), signifying that any explanation of climate change needs to take a geomagnetic forcing into account, and that the A 0 rejection-by-default can no longer hold. And that – to the strong-sense consensus climate change supporters – is a really inconvenient scientific truth.
References:
[1] IPCC, 2013: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker,T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)].
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
[2] Bindoff, N.L., P.A. Stott, K.M. AchutaRao, M.R. Allen, N. Gillett, D. Gutzler, K. Hansingo, G. Hegerl, Y. Hu, S. Jain, I.I. Mokhov, J. Overland, J. Perlwitz, R. Sebbari and X. Zhang, 2013: Detection and Attribution of Climate Change: from Global to Regional. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
[3] Rhein, M., S.R. Rintoul, S. Aoki, E. Campos, D. Chambers, R.A. Feely, S. Gulev, G.C. Johnson, S.A. Josey, A. Kostianoy, C. Mauritzen, D. Roemmich, L.D. Talley and F. Wang, 2013: Observations: Ocean. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA
About the author: Koen Vogel PhD received his PhD in Geology from The Pennsylvania State University, worked in the Petroleum Industry for 25 years in a variety of technical and managerial roles, and since his retirement has been engaged in pursuing his intellectual interests. Such interests include reviewing the IPCC reports, authoring a book on Geostatistics (currently in review), and editing technical proposals for start-ups. His latest paper, ‘The Role of Geomagnetic Induction Heating in Climate Change’ is available for open peer review on Principia Scientific International (please submit comments below on Koen Vogel’s new paper).
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related