principiascientificinternational--2020-09-07--All EMF’d Up: My Journey Through Wireless Radiation Poisoning

All EMF ’ d Up : My Journey Through Wireless Radiation Poisoning What is the diagnosis , doctor ?
The onset of strange symptoms , in a strange country , in the middle of the night led the author to more than a diagnosis of microwave illness .
After suffering months of unexplained nausea , insomnia , ringing in the ears , fatigue and body aches she consulted with a German doctor to help her figure out what was happening .
In her journey to find her own health she learned about the secrecy of government agencies and how evidence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ diary reads like Anne Frank .
Chilling and a warning to us all .
The last part of the book is devoted to valuable DYI measures to protect your home and family .
In the age of wireless this book is a necessary read .
Her story is reminiscent of other peoples journey ’ s into microwave illness and chronic electrohypersensitivity .
All EMFd Up ( Electromagnetic Fields ) : My Journey Through Wireless Radiation Poisoning and How You Can Protect Yourself .
( 2019 ) by Anne Mills is a good read @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2019 .
You can see his post and click to hear the podcast .
Note there is a fee .
EVENT : Thursday , 12th September at 12 noon EST ( 9 AM PST or 5 PM GMT ) Lloyd Burrell interviewing author Anne Mills .
“ Anne ’ s husband had been given a 4-year work assignment in Germany , she was healthy and looking forward to the experience of living abroad .
Her stay in Germany went well for several months , then she started experiencing health issues.She was losing her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and she was feeling achy in the morning .
She also began to experience terrible night sweats and shakes.It would come on right on the hour , like eleven o ’ clock at night.
“ And then it ramped up some kind of energy .
” At first , it was just a ringing in the ears .
She ’ d walk around the house trying to listen .
“ It drove me nuts.
” She ’ d be in bed at eleven o ’ clock and she ’ d almost sit up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is that ?
” He said ‘ No , that ’ s 700,000 .
You should not be here… this is illegal and dangerous .
You need to get out .
This is so high , it ’ s going to have to go to the German court system.
” Anne took Peter ’ s advice , she packed her bags and went with her husband to spend the night at a local pub .
Peter then recommended that Anne contacted Dr. Horst Eger , a physician known for his research papers on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for 2 hours with the doctor to explain her symptoms and she explained how she could see the radiation—like grids .
“ I see almost like a graph paper in front of my face .
It ’ s a repeating pattern , all the same .
Dr. Horst began to treat Anne for ‘ wireless poisoning ’ and gradually her symptoms began to improve .
Today Anne admits to being careful around EMFs , “ if I ’ m not around radiation , I ’ m fine .
You would never know it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was wrong .
I feel fine ” .… Remaining post and link to interview at https : //www.electricsense.com/all-emfd-wireless-poisoning/ Dr. Scott Eberle describes how a physician learned about his own electrosensitivity published originally in 2014 in the Sonoma Medicine and later reprinted in the Santa Clara County/Monterey County Medical Association Bulletin .
You can read Dr. Scott Eberle ’ s What ’ s the Diagnosis , Doctor ?
He has also written “ An Underworld Journey : Learning to Cope with Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity.
” Dr. Scott Eberle .
Ecopyschology.9 ( 2 ) :106-111 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ documented her experience in developing electrosensitivity and her frustration at being more isolated from other people and wireless technology she would like to use .
Electro-Sensitivity : When the Modern World Hurts The New York Times , CBS and more recently CNN reported unexplained symptoms in diplomats living in China and Cuba in 2017 and 2018 .
The source was found to be microwave radiation .
See Cuban Diplomats Likely Hit by Microwave Weapons .
A new study by Verma et al ( July 2019 ) , published in the Journal of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 40 military personnel who experienced unusual symptoms in Havana , Cuba .
Advanced neuroimaging of these personnel , compared to 48 matched healthy controls , showed significant abnormalities in “ whole brain white matter volume , regional gray and white matter volume , cerebellar tissue microstructural integrity , and functional connectivity in the auditory and visuospatial subnetworks but not in the executive control subnetwork.
” • Neuroimaging Findings in US Government Personnel With Possible Exposure to Directional Phenomena in Havana , Cuba .
( 2019 ) Verma R et al .
• Microwave @ @ @ @ @ @ @ U.S. Embassy Workers .
Doctors and scientists say microwave strikes may have caused sonic delusions and very real brain damage among embassy staff and family members .
Sept 1 , 2018 .
William J .
Broad .
https : //www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/science/sonic-attack-cuba-microwave.html ?
action=click & module=Well & pgtype=Homepage§ion=Health • Diplomats in China report similar brain injuries as Americans in Cuba in 2016 and 2017 , 25 Americans in the U.S. embassy in Cuba suffered serious , unexplained brain injuries .
Now , at least 15 American officials in China are reporting similar symptoms .
60 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ https : //www.cbsnews.com/news/diplomats-in-china-report-similar-brain-injuries-as-americans-in-cuba-60-minutes/ • Researcher links diplomats ’ mystery illness to radiofrequency/microwave radiation .
Eureka alert .
August 29 , 2018 .
American Academy for the Advancement of Science .
https : //www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2018-08/uoc–rld082918.php PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

All EMF’d Up: My Journey Through Wireless Radiation Poisoning
Written by Cindy Lee Russell
What is the diagnosis, doctor? The onset of strange symptoms, in a strange country, in the middle of the night led the author to more than a diagnosis of microwave illness.
After suffering months of unexplained nausea, insomnia, ringing in the ears, fatigue and body aches she consulted with a German doctor to help her figure out what was happening.
In her journey to find her own health she learned about the secrecy of government agencies and how evidence of health effects are suppressed. Her diary reads like Anne Frank. Chilling and a warning to us all. The last part of the book is devoted to valuable DYI measures to protect your home and family. In the age of wireless this book is a necessary read.
Her story is reminiscent of other peoples journey’s into microwave illness and chronic electrohypersensitivity. All EMFd Up (Electromagnetic Fields): My Journey Through Wireless Radiation Poisoning and How You Can Protect Yourself. (2019) by Anne Mills is a good read.
Interview of Anne Mills
Lloyd Burrell interviewed Anne Mills in 2019. You can see his post and click to hear the podcast. Note there is a fee. EVENT: Thursday, 12th September at 12 noon EST (9 AM PST or 5 PM GMT) Lloyd Burrell interviewing author Anne Mills.
“Anne’s husband had been given a 4-year work assignment in Germany, she was healthy and looking forward to the experience of living abroad. Her stay in Germany went well for several months, then she started experiencing health issues.She was losing her hair, her menstrual cycle had stopped and she was feeling achy in the morning. She also began to experience terrible night sweats and shakes.It would come on right on the hour, like eleven o’clock at night.“ And then it ramped up some kind of energy. ”At first, it was just a ringing in the ears. She’d walk around the house trying to listen. “It drove me nuts.” She’d be in bed at eleven o’clock and she’d almost sit up in bed, going, “What is that?”He said ‘No, that’s 700,000. You should not be here… this is illegal and dangerous. You need to get out. This is so high, it’s going to have to go to the German court system.” Anne took Peter’s advice, she packed her bags and went with her husband to spend the night at a local pub. Peter then recommended that Anne contacted Dr. Horst Eger, a physician known for his research papers on cell tower radiation. She sat down for 2 hours with the doctor to explain her symptoms and she explained how she could see the radiation—like grids. “I see almost like a graph paper in front of my face. It’s a repeating pattern, all the same. Dr. Horst began to treat Anne for ‘wireless poisoning’ and gradually her symptoms began to improve. Today Anne admits to being careful around EMFs, “if I’m not around radiation, I’m fine. You would never know it. You would never know that anything was wrong. I feel fine”.… Remaining post and link to interview at https://www.electricsense.com/all-emfd-wireless-poisoning/
Personal Stories About Electrosensitivity
Dr. Scott Eberle describes how a physician learned about his own electrosensitivity published originally in 2014 in the Sonoma Medicine and later reprinted in the Santa Clara County/Monterey County Medical Association Bulletin. You can read Dr. Scott Eberle’s What’s the Diagnosis, Doctor? He has also written “An Underworld Journey: Learning to Cope with Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity.” Dr. Scott Eberle. Ecopyschology.9(2):106-111, June 2017. www.researchgate.net
Writer Alison Main has documented her experience in developing electrosensitivity and her frustration at being more isolated from other people and wireless technology she would like to use. Electro-Sensitivity: When the Modern World Hurts
Unexplained Health Symptoms in Diplomats Living Abroad
The New York Times, CBS and more recently CNN reported unexplained symptoms in diplomats living in China and Cuba in 2017 and 2018. The source was found to be microwave radiation. See Cuban Diplomats Likely Hit by Microwave Weapons. A new study by Verma et al (July 2019), published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) examined 40 military personnel who experienced unusual symptoms in Havana, Cuba.
Advanced neuroimaging of these personnel, compared to 48 matched healthy controls, showed significant abnormalities in “whole brain white matter volume, regional gray and white matter volume, cerebellar tissue microstructural integrity, and functional connectivity in the auditory and visuospatial subnetworks but not in the executive control subnetwork.”
Cuba ‘sonic attacks’ changed people’s brains, study suggests. CNN July 23, 2019. Michael Nedelman and Arman Azad. https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/23/health/cuba-sonic-attacks-brain-mri-study/index.html
CNN July 23, 2019. Michael Nedelman and Arman Azad. https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/23/health/cuba-sonic-attacks-brain-mri-study/index.html Neuroimaging Findings in US Government Personnel With Possible Exposure to Directional Phenomena in Havana, Cuba. (2019) Verma R et al. JAMA. 2019;322(4):336-347. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2738552?guestAccessKey=47486c47-c01c-47fa-8b6e-41fc69f29cf4&utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_content=tfl&utm_term=072319
Verma R et al. Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of U.S. Embassy Workers. Doctors and scientists say microwave strikes may have caused sonic delusions and very real brain damage among embassy staff and family members. Sept 1, 2018. William J. Broad. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/science/sonic-attack-cuba-microwave.html?action=click&module=Well&pgtype=Homepage§ion=Health
William J. Broad. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/science/sonic-attack-cuba-microwave.html?action=click&module=Well&pgtype=Homepage§ion=Health Diplomats in China report similar brain injuries as Americans in Cuba in 2016 and 2017, 25 Americans in the U.S. embassy in Cuba suffered serious, unexplained brain injuries. Now, at least 15 American officials in China are reporting similar symptoms. 60 Minutes reports. March 15, 2019. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/diplomats-in-china-report-similar-brain-injuries-as-americans-in-cuba-60-minutes/
25 Americans in the U.S. embassy in Cuba suffered serious, unexplained brain injuries. Now, at least 15 American officials in China are reporting similar symptoms. 60 Minutes reports. March 15, 2019. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/diplomats-in-china-report-similar-brain-injuries-as-americans-in-cuba-60-minutes/ Researcher links diplomats’ mystery illness to radiofrequency/microwave radiation. Eureka alert. August 29, 2018. American Academy for the Advancement of Science. https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2018-08/uoc–rld082918.php
See Also
Read more at mdsafetech.org
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-07--Study: Microdoses of LSD give ‘remarkable’ Pain Relief

An incredible , first-of-its-kind trial testing the pain-killing properties of LSD microdoses has delivered the compelling suggestion that tiny , non-psychedelic doses of this infamous drug could serve as an effective analgesic .
Back in the 1960s , during the original heyday of psychedelic science , one of the more fascinating research areas for LSD was its unexpected efficacy as an analgesic .
Researcher Eric Kast was one of the pioneer investigators on the topic , publishing over a dozen key papers exploring the ways pain perception is influenced by LSD .
Kast ’ s work was primarily with active @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consistently found the drug produced effective , and protracted , analgesic effects .
Unfortunately , Kast ’ s work with LSD ended , as most psychedelic research did , when access to the drug was restricted in the late 1960s .
Decades later , as the freeze on psychedelic research begins to thaw , the idea of LSD as a pain-reliever still sits on the fringes of psychedelic science .
No modern clinical researcher has returned to Kast ’ s ideas , however , anecdotal cases have begun to emerge highlighting some people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pain .
This new study , led by researchers from Maastricht University with assistance from the Beckley Foundation , is the first clinical trial to revisit this topic in more than 50 years .
Unlike Kast ’ s prior work , this new research focused on microdoses of LSD rather than larger , actively psychedelic doses .
“ From a medical point of view , controlled research on the efficacy of LSD in pain management should focus on non-hallucinogenic , low doses of LSD , which are more manageable and thus preferable over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ produce full-blown psychedelic effects , ” the researchers explain in their paper .
The double-blind , placebo-controlled trial recruited 24 healthy subjects , each of whom took part in four separate experimental sessions , separated by at least five days .
Three different LSD microdoses were tested ( five , 10 , and 20 micrograms ) alongside a placebo .
During each experimental session , the subjects completed a Cold Pressor Test ( CBT ) at two time points following dosing : 90 minutes after and five hours after .
The test basically @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a tank of water at 3 °C ( 37.4 °F ) .
Pain tolerance is measured by combining the amount of time one can hold their hand in the cold water , with a series of subjective ratings regarding painfulness .
The researchers described the results of the study as “ remarkable ” , with the 20-µg-dose group revealing prolonged improvements to pain tolerance compared to both lower doses and placebo .
The results were sustained across both time points suggesting the analgesic effect is just as prominent five hours later as it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ The current data consistently indicated that LSD 20 µg significantly reduced pain perception as compared with placebo , whereas lower doses of LSD did not , ” the researchers write .
“ LSD 20 µg significantly increased pain tolerance ( i.e .
immersion time ) by about 20 % , while decreasing the subjective levels of experienced painfulness and unpleasantness.
” So what exactly is going on here ?
Is LSD just distracting people from the acute pain , or is it actually inhibiting pain signaling through a more direct pharmacological mechanism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ analgesic effects were the result of LSD reorienting attention away from pain sensations to a more encompassing psychedelic experience .
While that hypothesis certainly is reasonable when high LSD doses are administered , it doesn ’ t really explain the results seen in this new microdose trial .
The researchers do note a small correlation between increasing levels of psychedelic disassociation and greater pain relief in their results , but the association was weak .
They estimate it accounting for no more than six percent of the variance in analgesic results .
A @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the new study , from pharmacologically influencing specific brain receptors known to mediate pain sensation , to triggering a condition called hypertension-associated hypoalgesia whereby blood pressure rises can lead to a diminished perception of pain .
“ … an extended dose-finding study is needed to determine the dose at which analgesic effects of LSD are optimal , i.e .
when efficacy is maximal and mental interference is minimal , ” propose the researchers .
“ Such a study could potentially explore the trade-off between increments in treatment efficacy and psychedelic symptoms in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ i.e .
20–50 µg LSD ) .
” Perhaps the most intriguing finding in the study is the observation that the analgesic effect seen in the 20-µg LSD group is comparable to what prior studies have seen with in the same cold water pain test for opioids such as oxycodone and morphine .
Needless to say , a great deal more research is needed before these results can be extrapolated into any real-world clinical treatment .
Will these LSD microdose results translate into pain relief for chronic pain sufferers ?
Or is this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of acute pain ?
What are the safety issues surrounding long-term use ?
Does a tolerance eventually build to low-dose LSD ?
At the very least these promising results suggest further clinical trials are necessary as modern researchers slowly catch up with where the science was half a century ago .
The new study was published in the Journal of Psychopharmacology .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Defend The Scientific Method .

Study: Microdoses of LSD give ‘remarkable’ Pain Relief
Written by Rich Haridy
An incredible, first-of-its-kind trial testing the pain-killing properties of LSD microdoses has delivered the compelling suggestion that tiny, non-psychedelic doses of this infamous drug could serve as an effective analgesic.
Back in the 1960s, during the original heyday of psychedelic science, one of the more fascinating research areas for LSD was its unexpected efficacy as an analgesic. Researcher Eric Kast was one of the pioneer investigators on the topic, publishing over a dozen key papers exploring the ways pain perception is influenced by LSD.
Kast’s work was primarily with active psychedelic doses of LSD, and he consistently found the drug produced effective, and protracted, analgesic effects. Unfortunately, Kast’s work with LSD ended, as most psychedelic research did, when access to the drug was restricted in the late 1960s.
Decades later, as the freeze on psychedelic research begins to thaw, the idea of LSD as a pain-reliever still sits on the fringes of psychedelic science. No modern clinical researcher has returned to Kast’s ideas, however, anecdotal cases have begun to emerge highlighting some people self-medicating with LSD microdoses to treat chronic pain.
This new study, led by researchers from Maastricht University with assistance from the Beckley Foundation, is the first clinical trial to revisit this topic in more than 50 years. Unlike Kast’s prior work, this new research focused on microdoses of LSD rather than larger, actively psychedelic doses.
“From a medical point of view, controlled research on the efficacy of LSD in pain management should focus on non-hallucinogenic, low doses of LSD, which are more manageable and thus preferable over treatment with high doses of LSD that produce full-blown psychedelic effects,” the researchers explain in their paper.
The double-blind, placebo-controlled trial recruited 24 healthy subjects, each of whom took part in four separate experimental sessions, separated by at least five days. Three different LSD microdoses were tested (five, 10, and 20 micrograms) alongside a placebo.
During each experimental session, the subjects completed a Cold Pressor Test (CBT) at two time points following dosing: 90 minutes after and five hours after. The test basically involves plunging one’s hand into a tank of water at 3 °C (37.4 °F). Pain tolerance is measured by combining the amount of time one can hold their hand in the cold water, with a series of subjective ratings regarding painfulness.
The researchers described the results of the study as “remarkable”, with the 20-µg-dose group revealing prolonged improvements to pain tolerance compared to both lower doses and placebo. The results were sustained across both time points suggesting the analgesic effect is just as prominent five hours later as it is within the first 90 minutes.
“The current data consistently indicated that LSD 20 µg significantly reduced pain perception as compared with placebo, whereas lower doses of LSD did not,” the researchers write. “LSD 20 µg significantly increased pain tolerance (i.e. immersion time) by about 20%, while decreasing the subjective levels of experienced painfulness and unpleasantness.”
So what exactly is going on here? Is LSD just distracting people from the acute pain, or is it actually inhibiting pain signaling through a more direct pharmacological mechanism?
Kast hypothesized 50 year ago these analgesic effects were the result of LSD reorienting attention away from pain sensations to a more encompassing psychedelic experience. While that hypothesis certainly is reasonable when high LSD doses are administered, it doesn’t really explain the results seen in this new microdose trial.
The researchers do note a small correlation between increasing levels of psychedelic disassociation and greater pain relief in their results, but the association was weak. They estimate it accounting for no more than six percent of the variance in analgesic results.
A variety of possible alternate hypotheses are presented in the new study, from pharmacologically influencing specific brain receptors known to mediate pain sensation, to triggering a condition called hypertension-associated hypoalgesia whereby blood pressure rises can lead to a diminished perception of pain.
“… an extended dose-finding study is needed to determine the dose at which analgesic effects of LSD are optimal, i.e. when efficacy is maximal and mental interference is minimal,” propose the researchers. “Such a study could potentially explore the trade-off between increments in treatment efficacy and psychedelic symptoms in a low to medium dose range (i.e. 20–50 µg LSD).”
Perhaps the most intriguing finding in the study is the observation that the analgesic effect seen in the 20-µg LSD group is comparable to what prior studies have seen with in the same cold water pain test for opioids such as oxycodone and morphine.
Needless to say, a great deal more research is needed before these results can be extrapolated into any real-world clinical treatment. Will these LSD microdose results translate into pain relief for chronic pain sufferers? Or is this kind of analgesic best for certain types of acute pain? What are the safety issues surrounding long-term use? Does a tolerance eventually build to low-dose LSD?
At the very least these promising results suggest further clinical trials are necessary as modern researchers slowly catch up with where the science was half a century ago.
The new study was published in the Journal of Psychopharmacology.
Read more at newatlas.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-06--CDC Vindicates Dr. Bukacek, Indicts Itself

At the height of the government ’ s coronavirus lies and lockdowns , 30-year veteran physician , Dr. Ann Bukacek , stood at the podium of Liberty Fellowship and exposed the gross exaggeration of corona death certificates that were being encouraged by the CDC as a way of manipulating public perception regarding the nature and extent of the virus .
She used the CDC ’ s own statements to prove her assertions .
For daring to tell the truth about the coronavirus and the CDC ’ s hype and fearmongering over the virus , a tsunami of hate , vitriol @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at this respected physician ( she has been voted Best Family Physician in the county two years running and three times overall ) at a level most of us can not imagine .
Even many of her peers in the medical profession attacked her mercilessly—some even threatened to get her license revoked .
She didn ’ t flinch .
She has more courage than most men you will ever meet .
Well , hold onto your seats .
A recent report published by the CDC itself totally vindicates Dr. Bukacek and , at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ For the most part , of course , the mainstream media is ignoring the report .
Dr. Annie Bukacek of Kalispell did her best to try warning Montanans that the death rate of COVID-19 was being stretched and contorted by misleading death certificates .
In the article , Montana Doctor Blows the Whistle on the CDC ’ s Manipulated Coronavirus Figures , the Gazette reported Bukacek ’ s presentation which explained that COVID-19 was being placed on death certificates as the cause of death merely because the deceased had tested positive for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it actually caused them to die .
Bukaceks ’ assertions were picked up by the national press and joined a loud chorus of medical professionals around the nation who were insisting that the CDC ’ s figures were skewed .
Largely , Bukacek was slandered in the press in outlets like The Daily Beast , Buzzfeed , and even Rolling Stone for being an ‘ anti-vaxxer ’ and ‘ conspiracy theorist ’ who was ‘ undermining COVID-19 response in Montana.
’ Buzzfeed wrote of Dr. Bukacek , “ In a widely circulated video @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doubt over official COVID-19 death tolls , saying medical professionals were pressured to attribute non-COVID deaths to the virus.
” For this , Montana liberals who were prone to believe whatever was told to them by Governor Bullock and state health officials and castigate any opposing view as a “ conspiracy theory ” launched a petition to oust Dr. Bukacek from the Flathead County Health Board .
The petition to remove her , which has roughly half the signatures than the petition to keep her , reads , “ Dr Annie Bukacek has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and religious views ahead of science in regards to the Covid-19 outbreak.
” It turns out , Dr. Bukacek was right all along , and her understanding of science and medicine has been vindicated in the latest report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention .
According to the CDC , only 6 % of deaths originally reported as caused by Coronavirus were deaths exclusively caused by Coronavirus .
As Dr. Bukacek warned Montanans from the beginning , the rest of the deaths attributed to COVID-19 were in cases in which patients @ @ @ @ @ @ @ underlying health conditions that actually caused their death .
While news outlets all across the country are pointing out that the CDC has provided this data , showing that COVID-19 is the exclusive or primary cause of death in only 6 % of the cases ( and has been inflated a whopping 1,567 % ) , it should be noted that it doesn ’ t mean per se that COVID-19 didn ’ t have a role to play in the other 94 % of deaths .
What it does mean is that patients @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are far more serious .
Essentially , what the CDC has admitted is that those who have died from heart attacks or the flu were claimed to have died from COVID-19 on death certificates and in CDC reporting , whether or not that was the primary cause of their death ( or necessarily a cause at all ) .
If Montana COVID-19 rates are largely similar to those across the United States , this means that approximately six Montanans have died exclusively from COVID-19 .
Meanwhile , Governor Bullock and many local health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ latest scientific findings .
Did you get that ?
The primary cause of death attributed to the coronavirus has been inflated by a whopping 1,567 % .
And did you hear this ?
“ Essentially , what the CDC has admitted is that those who have died from heart attacks or the flu were claimed to have died from COVID-19 on death certificates and in CDC reporting , whether or not that was the primary cause of their death ( or necessarily a cause at all ) .
” That ’ s EXACTLY @ @ @ @ @ @ @ April .
This local NBC news report states that the CDC is now admitting that only 9,683 people in the U.S. have died exclusively from the coronavirus—NOT the reputed 160,000 plus .
The rest of the deaths had other serious underlying diseases that took their lives .
Please let that sink in .
The CDC ’ s own report says less than 10,000 people have died exclusively from the coronavirus .
That fact is a blatant admission that the entire CDC/WHO/medical establishment/White House/congressional/news media corona narrative has indeed been grossly exaggerated and manipulated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Montana Daily Gazette , which was quoted above , gave an excellent summary of “ The Great Coronavirus Panic Of 2020.
” * The government response to COVID-19 has done far more damage than the virus itself .
* Far fewer have died exclusively from COVID-19 than is regularly reported .
* Far more have had COVID-19 than we were led to believe .
* The so-called “ experts ” who insist we listen to them have been wrong on almost everything from the beginning .
* We self-sabotaged our economy and stripped @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a paper tiger .
* The government now has a far better idea exactly how far they can push citizens before we push back ( and it ’ s further than any of us previously thought ) .
This isn ’ t merely a strategy ; it is a test .
* There is clearly a coordinated effort to keep us afraid of this virus and afraid of each other in a way that far surpasses common-sense communicable virus mitigation .
The media , technocrats , and at least half of our politicians @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should I say , terrorized ) .
* Masks are clearly far less effective at preventing the spread of COVID-19 than social distancing ( especially if you are sick ) , but almost all the PSAs from our Nanny State focus on masks exclusively .
I ’ d suggest this is because without masks there would be no visible reminder in your daily life that you ’ re supposed to be terrified of something .
* In fact , if it weren ’ t for media propaganda and the hysteria propagated by politicians @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not know there was a ‘ pandemic ’ at all .
That ’ s right ; without their fear mongering , we might have noticed nothing but a nasty respiratory bug going around , but it would not have struck us as a particularly deadly pandemic .
This means it ’ s time for the American people to call the bluff and throw away those worthless masks , forget those stupid social distancing mandates and demand that their State and local authorities give the People their country back .
The CDC has lost @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doubt : The CDC is nothing but a criminal cabal of white-coated pimps working for Big Pharma .
Anthony Fauci should go to prison .
Bill Gates should go to prison .
The medical “ experts ” who regurgitated and went along with this fraud should find other work , and the politicians and government bureaucrats who helped shut this country down , who helped destroy millions of jobs , who helped ruin the careers of millions of people and who helped take the homes and livelihoods of millions of Americans should be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ slow boat to China .
And let ’ s not forget a president and Congress that stole over 6 trillion dollars from the American taxpayers—two thirds of which went to their big banker buddies at the Federal Reserve .
Not only has the CDC lost credibility , so has the U.S. medical establishment .
Doctors HAD to have known that the narrative was false , but they sacrificed their integrity and honesty and played along—they played along for BIG MONEY .
HCA Healthcare is one of the world ’ s wealthiest hospital chains @ @ @ @ @ @ @ billion in profits over the past two years .
It is worth $ 36 billion .
It paid its chief executive $ 26 million in 2019 .
But as the coronavirus swept the country , employees at HCA repeatedly complained that the company was not providing adequate protective gear to nurses , medical technicians and cleaning staff .
Last month , HCA executives warned that they would lay off thousands of nurses if they didn ’ t agree to wage freezes and other concessions .
A few weeks earlier , HCA had received @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the federal government , part of an effort to stabilize hospitals during the pandemic .
HCA is among a long list of deep-pocketed health care companies that have received billions of dollars in taxpayer funds but are laying off or cutting the pay of tens of thousands of doctors , nurses and lower-paid workers .
Many have continued to pay their top executives millions , although some executives have taken modest pay cuts .
The New York Times analyzed tax and securities filings by 60 of the country ’ s largest hospital @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of more than $ 15 billion in emergency funds through the economic stimulus package in the federal CARES Act .
The hospitals — including publicly traded juggernauts like HCA and Tenet Healthcare , elite nonprofits like the Mayo Clinic , and regional chains with thousands of beds and billions in cash — are collectively sitting on tens of billions of dollars of cash reserves that are supposed to help them weather an unanticipated storm .
And together , they awarded the five highest-paid officials at each chain about $ 874 million in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disclosed their finances .
At least 36 of those hospital chains have laid off , furloughed or reduced the pay of employees as they try to save money during the pandemic .
Seven chains that together received more than $ 1.5 billion in bailout funds — Trinity Health , Beaumont Health and the Henry Ford Health System in Michigan ; SSM Health and Mercy in St. Louis ; Fairview Health in Minneapolis ; and Prisma Health in South Carolina — have furloughed or laid off more than 30,000 workers , according to company @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bailout money , which hospitals received from the Health and Human Services Department without having to apply for it , came with few strings attached .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

CDC Vindicates Dr. Bukacek, Indicts Itself
Written by Chuck Baldwin
At the height of the government’s coronavirus lies and lockdowns, 30-year veteran physician, Dr. Ann Bukacek, stood at the podium of Liberty Fellowship and exposed the gross exaggeration of corona death certificates that were being encouraged by the CDC as a way of manipulating public perception regarding the nature and extent of the virus. She used the CDC’s own statements to prove her assertions.
For daring to tell the truth about the coronavirus and the CDC’s hype and fearmongering over the virus, a tsunami of hate, vitriol and personal and media attacks were hurled at this respected physician (she has been voted Best Family Physician in the county two years running and three times overall) at a level most of us cannot imagine. Even many of her peers in the medical profession attacked her mercilessly—some even threatened to get her license revoked. She didn’t flinch. She has more courage than most men you will ever meet.
Well, hold onto your seats. A recent report published by the CDC itself totally vindicates Dr. Bukacek and, at the same time, indicts itself. For the most part, of course, the mainstream media is ignoring the report.
Dr. Annie Bukacek of Kalispell did her best to try warning Montanans that the death rate of COVID-19 was being stretched and contorted by misleading death certificates. In the article, Montana Doctor Blows the Whistle on the CDC’s Manipulated Coronavirus Figures, the Gazette reported Bukacek’s presentation which explained that COVID-19 was being placed on death certificates as the cause of death merely because the deceased had tested positive for the virus and regardless of whether or not it actually caused them to die. Bukaceks’ assertions were picked up by the national press and joined a loud chorus of medical professionals around the nation who were insisting that the CDC’s figures were skewed.
Largely, Bukacek was slandered in the press in outlets like The Daily Beast, Buzzfeed, and even Rolling Stone for being an ‘anti-vaxxer’ and ‘conspiracy theorist’ who was ‘undermining COVID-19 response in Montana.’ Buzzfeed wrote of Dr. Bukacek, “In a widely circulated video posted on social media, Bukacek cast doubt over official COVID-19 death tolls, saying medical professionals were pressured to attribute non-COVID deaths to the virus.”
For this, Montana liberals who were prone to believe whatever was told to them by Governor Bullock and state health officials and castigate any opposing view as a “conspiracy theory” launched a petition to oust Dr. Bukacek from the Flathead County Health Board.
The petition to remove her, which has roughly half the signatures than the petition to keep her, reads, “Dr Annie Bukacek has violated public trust by putting her political and religious views ahead of science in regards to the Covid-19 outbreak.”
It turns out, Dr. Bukacek was right all along, and her understanding of science and medicine has been vindicated in the latest report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
According to the CDC, only 6% of deaths originally reported as caused by Coronavirus were deaths exclusively caused by Coronavirus. As Dr. Bukacek warned Montanans from the beginning, the rest of the deaths attributed to COVID-19 were in cases in which patients tested positive, but who had other underlying health conditions that actually caused their death.
While news outlets all across the country are pointing out that the CDC has provided this data, showing that COVID-19 is the exclusive or primary cause of death in only 6% of the cases (and has been inflated a whopping 1,567%), it should be noted that it doesn’t mean per se that COVID-19 didn’t have a role to play in the other 94% of deaths. What it does mean is that patients died with or from other ailments that are far more serious.
Essentially, what the CDC has admitted is that those who have died from heart attacks or the flu were claimed to have died from COVID-19 on death certificates and in CDC reporting, whether or not that was the primary cause of their death (or necessarily a cause at all).
If Montana COVID-19 rates are largely similar to those across the United States, this means that approximately six Montanans have died exclusively from COVID-19. Meanwhile, Governor Bullock and many local health boards seem to be unmoved by the latest scientific findings.
(Source)
Did you get that? The primary cause of death attributed to the coronavirus has been inflated by a whopping 1,567%.
And did you hear this? “Essentially, what the CDC has admitted is that those who have died from heart attacks or the flu were claimed to have died from COVID-19 on death certificates and in CDC reporting, whether or not that was the primary cause of their death (or necessarily a cause at all).” That’s EXACTLY what Dr. Bukacek told us back in April.
This local NBC news report states that the CDC is now admitting that only 9,683 people in the U.S. have died exclusively from the coronavirus—NOT the reputed 160,000 plus. The rest of the deaths had other serious underlying diseases that took their lives.
Please let that sink in. The CDC’s own report says less than 10,000 people have died exclusively from the coronavirus.
That fact is a blatant admission that the entire CDC/WHO/medical establishment/White House/congressional/news media corona narrative has indeed been grossly exaggerated and manipulated.
Jordan Hall, Publisher of the Montana Daily Gazette, which was quoted above, gave an excellent summary of “The Great Coronavirus Panic Of 2020.”
* The government response to COVID-19 has done far more damage than the virus itself.
* Far fewer have died exclusively from COVID-19 than is regularly reported.
* Far more have had COVID-19 than we were led to believe.
* The so-called “experts” who insist we listen to them have been wrong on almost everything from the beginning.
* We self-sabotaged our economy and stripped ourselves of liberty for what amounts to a paper tiger.
* The government now has a far better idea exactly how far they can push citizens before we push back (and it’s further than any of us previously thought). This isn’t merely a strategy; it is a test.
* There is clearly a coordinated effort to keep us afraid of this virus and afraid of each other in a way that far surpasses common-sense communicable virus mitigation. The media, technocrats, and at least half of our politicians want you to remain terrified (or should I say, terrorized).
* Masks are clearly far less effective at preventing the spread of COVID-19 than social distancing (especially if you are sick), but almost all the PSAs from our Nanny State focus on masks exclusively. I’d suggest this is because without masks there would be no visible reminder in your daily life that you’re supposed to be terrified of something.
* In fact, if it weren’t for media propaganda and the hysteria propagated by politicians, I submit to you we would not know there was a ‘pandemic’ at all. That’s right; without their fear mongering, we might have noticed nothing but a nasty respiratory bug going around, but it would not have struck us as a particularly deadly pandemic.
Amen, Jordan!
This means it’s time for the American people to call the bluff and throw away those worthless masks, forget those stupid social distancing mandates and demand that their State and local authorities give the People their country back.
The CDC has lost all credibility. There is now no doubt: The CDC is nothing but a criminal cabal of white-coated pimps working for Big Pharma. Anthony Fauci should go to prison. Bill Gates should go to prison. The medical “experts” who regurgitated and went along with this fraud should find other work, and the politicians and government bureaucrats who helped shut this country down, who helped destroy millions of jobs, who helped ruin the careers of millions of people and who helped take the homes and livelihoods of millions of Americans should be tarred and feathered and put on a slow boat to China. And let’s not forget a president and Congress that stole over 6 trillion dollars from the American taxpayers—two thirds of which went to their big banker buddies at the Federal Reserve.
Not only has the CDC lost credibility, so has the U.S. medical establishment. Doctors HAD to have known that the narrative was false, but they sacrificed their integrity and honesty and played along—they played along for BIG MONEY.
HCA Healthcare is one of the world’s wealthiest hospital chains. It earned more than $7 billion in profits over the past two years. It is worth $36 billion. It paid its chief executive $26 million in 2019.
But as the coronavirus swept the country, employees at HCA repeatedly complained that the company was not providing adequate protective gear to nurses, medical technicians and cleaning staff. Last month, HCA executives warned that they would lay off thousands of nurses if they didn’t agree to wage freezes and other concessions.
A few weeks earlier, HCA had received about $1 billion in bailout funds from the federal government, part of an effort to stabilize hospitals during the pandemic.
HCA is among a long list of deep-pocketed health care companies that have received billions of dollars in taxpayer funds but are laying off or cutting the pay of tens of thousands of doctors, nurses and lower-paid workers. Many have continued to pay their top executives millions, although some executives have taken modest pay cuts.
The New York Times analyzed tax and securities filings by 60 of the country’s largest hospital chains, which have received a total of more than $15 billion in emergency funds through the economic stimulus package in the federal CARES Act.
The hospitals — including publicly traded juggernauts like HCA and Tenet Healthcare, elite nonprofits like the Mayo Clinic, and regional chains with thousands of beds and billions in cash — are collectively sitting on tens of billions of dollars of cash reserves that are supposed to help them weather an unanticipated storm. And together, they awarded the five highest-paid officials at each chain about $874 million in the most recent year for which they have disclosed their finances.
At least 36 of those hospital chains have laid off, furloughed or reduced the pay of employees as they try to save money during the pandemic.
Seven chains that together received more than $1.5 billion in bailout funds — Trinity Health, Beaumont Health and the Henry Ford Health System in Michigan; SSM Health and Mercy in St. Louis; Fairview Health in Minneapolis; and Prisma Health in South Carolina — have furloughed or laid off more than 30,000 workers, according to company officials and local news reports.
The bailout money, which hospitals received from the Health and Human Services Department without having to apply for it, came with few strings attached.
Read the rest at chuckbaldwinlive.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-06--UCLA Study: Chance of 50-64 Year Old Dying From COVID19 is 1 in 19 Million

A new study from medical researchers at UCLA and Stanford University found the chances of contracting or dying from coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ thought .
One America ’ s Pearson Sharp has the details .
‘ We get @ @ @ @ @ deaths , and very large counts of cases , and they all seem to be @ @ @ @ @ that matter to me is not really answered by those questions.
’ ‘ Even at @ @ @ @ @ ] peak , except for very few places , the severe events were pretty rare @ @ @ @ @ given all of the data and the images and the emergencies , the war metaphors @ @ @ @ @ lack of control , these were all factors that I think elevated the perception of @ @ @ @ @

Written by One America News Network
A new study from medical researchers at UCLA and Stanford University found the chances of contracting or dying from coronavirus are much lower than previously thought. One America’s Pearson Sharp has the details.
Excerpts:
‘We get these really large counts of deaths, and very large counts of cases, and they all seem to be growing, but what does that matter to me is not really answered by those questions.’
‘Even at [the pandemic’s] peak, except for very few places, the severe events were pretty rare events.
‘The perception given all of the data and the images and the emergencies, the war metaphors, the uncertainty, the lack of control, these were all factors that I think elevated the perception of risk. Dr Rajiv Bhatia


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-07--Belarusian President: IMF & World Bank Tried to Bribe Me for ‘Lockdown’

Belarusian President : IMF & World Bank Tried to Bribe Me for ‘ Lockdown ’ Belarusian President Aleksandr Lukashenko said last month via Belarusian Telegraph Agency , BelTA.
, that World Bank and IMF offered him a bribe of $ 940 million USD in the form of “ Covid Relief Aid.
” In exchange for $ 940 million USD , the World Bank and IMF demanded that the President of Belarus : • imposed “ extreme lockdown on his people ” • force them to wear face masks • impose very strict curfews • impose a police state • crash @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the offer and stated that he could not accept such an offer and would put his people above the needs of the IMF and World Bank .
This is NOT a conspiracy .
You may research this yourself .
He actually said this !
Now IMF and World Bank are bailing out failing airlines with billions of dollars , and in exchange , they are FORCING airline CEOs to implement VERY STRICT POLICIES such as FORCED face masks covers on EVERYONE , including SMALL CHILDREN , whose health will suffer as a result @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is true for Belarus , then it is true for the rest of the world !
The IMF and World Bank want to crash every major economy with the intent of buying over every nation ’ s infrastructure at cents on the dollar !
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Belarusian President: IMF & World Bank Tried to Bribe Me for ‘Lockdown’
Written by Martin Armstrong
Belarusian President Aleksandr Lukashenko said last month via Belarusian Telegraph Agency, BelTA., that World Bank and IMF offered him a bribe of $940 million USD in the form of “Covid Relief Aid.” In exchange for $940 million USD, the World Bank and IMF demanded that the President of Belarus:
• imposed “extreme lockdown on his people”
• force them to wear face masks
• impose very strict curfews
• impose a police state
• crash the economy
Belarus President Aleksandr Lukashenko REFUSED the offer and stated that he could not accept such an offer and would put his people above the needs of the IMF and World Bank. This is NOT a conspiracy. You may research this yourself. He actually said this!
Now IMF and World Bank are bailing out failing airlines with billions of dollars, and in exchange, they are FORCING airline CEOs to implement VERY STRICT POLICIES such as FORCED face masks covers on EVERYONE, including SMALL CHILDREN, whose health will suffer as a result of these policies.
And if it is true for Belarus, then it is true for the rest of the world! The IMF and World Bank want to crash every major economy with the intent of buying over every nation’s infrastructure at cents on the dollar!
Read more at www.armstrongeconomics.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-07--The Never-Ending Lies Of Climate Activists

Photos and videos are extremely useful tools in storytelling and even in conveying news to the masses .
Be they simple photographs of people or videos of people marching through a street , they help us relate to the actual events and stories .
In the past decade , climate-change enthusiasts and activists have utilized this aspect to the utmost to highlight natural disasters and propagate the idea that climate change has aggravated them .
But often this grim and devastating image of natural calamities does not reveal the complete picture .
In fact , climate activists exaggerate weather events @ @ @ @ @ @ @ events ( long-term and global to regional ) and misrepresent regular incidents as unprecedented ones .
Last month , I came across a retweet by Greta Thunberg , a globally recognized climate activist .
She retweeted a tweet showing recent flooding in India .
The tweet was preceded and followed by a series of tweets that highlighted allegedly climate-driven natural disasters in an attempt to drive home the need for climate action .
It was surprising for me to learn that Greta and others portrayed the regular summer rainfall downpour in India as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ arsenal to promote their climate doomsday narrative .
India is in the midst of its summer rainfall season .
Also known as the monsoon , these rains are the lifeline for India ’ s 1.3 billion people .
They are a boon , not a disaster as Greta and other activists claim .
The excess rainfall has brought much joy to the majority of the Indian people , who depend on rain for agriculture .
Farmers have already begun sowing , and a historic food crop output is expected in 2021 , topping @ @ @ @ @ @ @ flooding Greta retweeted , the flooding in the state of Bihar is unrelated to long-term climate change .
With the increasing population , more people have been prone to be impacted by floodwaters than before .
Flooding in that region has been a regular event , and not something new and unprecedented .
The rainfall data since 1871 reveal that the annual precipitation levels have always been erratic , with no significant trend .
There have been no significant changes in the rainfall pattern , according to scientists at the Indian Meteorological Department @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the real climate in the region .
This methodology – of portraying natural disasters as a consequence of climate change and claiming it as unprecedented – has become a common practice among climate activists .
Even the ongoing California fires and the subsequent blackout in the state of California were blamed on climate change .
Activists circulated images of fires in California , adding their own doomsday opinions as captions .
But a look at the data reveals a completely different reality about fires in the United States .
The data from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decrease in the number of fires in the U.S. between 1926 and 2017 .
The numbers of fires and of acres burnt were both less in every year of 1990–2017 than in every year from 1926–1950 , well before allegedly man-made global warming became significant .
In addition , 2019 had only half the burnt area of 2018 .
The notion that climate change is causing more and larger wildfires is false .
And the recent blackouts in California were due to the failure of renewable technology , as even Gov .
Gavin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ videos of natural calamities on your phones and TVs may seem to convince you about a supposed climate disaster , but they do not tell you the whole story .
Climate activists lie – and they do so many times .
Left unchecked , they mislead millions into falsehoods and needless fears .
It is time they were held accountable for their lies .
It is time we as a society became more data-conscious and more discerning with the popular voices in the media .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

The Never-Ending Lies Of Climate Activists
Written by Vijay Jayaraj
Photos and videos are extremely useful tools in storytelling and even in conveying news to the masses. Be they simple photographs of people or videos of people marching through a street, they help us relate to the actual events and stories.
In the past decade, climate-change enthusiasts and activists have utilized this aspect to the utmost to highlight natural disasters and propagate the idea that climate change has aggravated them.
But often this grim and devastating image of natural calamities does not reveal the complete picture. In fact, climate activists exaggerate weather events (short-term and local) as climate events (long-term and global to regional) and misrepresent regular incidents as unprecedented ones.
Last month, I came across a retweet by Greta Thunberg, a globally recognized climate activist. She retweeted a tweet showing recent flooding in India.
The tweet was preceded and followed by a series of tweets that highlighted allegedly climate-driven natural disasters in an attempt to drive home the need for climate action.
It was surprising for me to learn that Greta and others portrayed the regular summer rainfall downpour in India as something unprecedented and use it as an arsenal to promote their climate doomsday narrative.
India is in the midst of its summer rainfall season. Also known as the monsoon, these rains are the lifeline for India’s 1.3 billion people. They are a boon, not a disaster as Greta and other activists claim.
The excess rainfall has brought much joy to the majority of the Indian people, who depend on rain for agriculture. Farmers have already begun sowing, and a historic food crop output is expected in 2021, topping already record-high levels.
As for the flooding Greta retweeted, the flooding in the state of Bihar is unrelated to long-term climate change. With the increasing population, more people have been prone to be impacted by floodwaters than before.
Flooding in that region has been a regular event, and not something new and unprecedented. The rainfall data since 1871 reveal that the annual precipitation levels have always been erratic, with no significant trend.
There have been no significant changes in the rainfall pattern, according to scientists at the Indian Meteorological Department. To claim otherwise reveals ignorance of the real climate in the region.
This methodology – of portraying natural disasters as a consequence of climate change and claiming it as unprecedented – has become a common practice among climate activists.
Even the ongoing California fires and the subsequent blackout in the state of California were blamed on climate change. Activists circulated images of fires in California, adding their own doomsday opinions as captions.
But a look at the data reveals a completely different reality about fires in the United States.
The data from the National Interagency Fire Center show an actual decrease in the number of fires in the U.S. between 1926 and 2017.
The numbers of fires and of acres burnt were both less in every year of 1990–2017 than in every year from 1926–1950, well before allegedly man-made global warming became significant. In addition, 2019 had only half the burnt area of 2018.
The notion that climate change is causing more and larger wildfires is false.
And the recent blackouts in California were due to the failure of renewable technology, as even Gov. Gavin Newsom admitted.
The devastating photos and videos of natural calamities on your phones and TVs may seem to convince you about a supposed climate disaster, but they do not tell you the whole story.
Climate activists lie – and they do so many times. Left unchecked, they mislead millions into falsehoods and needless fears.
It is time they were held accountable for their lies. It is time we as a society became more data-conscious and more discerning with the popular voices in the media.
Read more at WND
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-07--Isolated Pacific Island Hachijojima Shows No Warming In 80 Years

Hachijojima is a volcanic Japanese island some 287 kilometers south of Tokyo , to which it belongs .
7,522 people live on its 63 km2 of area .
What makes Hachijojima interesting climatically is its rural , non-urban features – in the middle of the ocean – making station siting there less prone to factors that could corrupt the data , such as airports , asphalt , concrete , steel , and other heat-sink-acting infrastructure .
Today we look at data from the Japan Meteorological Agency ( JMA ) going back almost 80 years .
Hearing all the claims about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , many readers would think that there must be warming happening there as well .
The data have a surprise in store .
Now that summer has ended , we plot the latest data to see if summers have indeed been warming at this island .
As the above data show , there has been virtually no trend at all over the past 80 years .
Warming ?
Still no sign of it at all .
Next , we look at the mean winter temperatures at this location since 1947 : Like summer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trend one way or the other .
Where ’ s the bad climate change news here ?
To round out the analysis and to summarize , we plot the annual mean temperature data recorded for Hachjojima : Interestingly , the annual temperature behavior appears to follow a cyclic behavior that very much resembles some ocean-surface temperature cycles we see from around the globe , like the PDO or AMO .
Climate indeed changes , but what we see above it can not be due to anything anthropogenic .
Read more at No Tricks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Isolated Pacific Island Hachijojima Shows No Warming In 80 Years
Written by Pierre Gosselin
Hachijojima is a volcanic Japanese island some 287 kilometers south of Tokyo, to which it belongs. 7,522 people live on its 63 km2 of area.
What makes Hachijojima interesting climatically is its rural, non-urban features – in the middle of the ocean – making station siting there less prone to factors that could corrupt the data, such as airports, asphalt, concrete, steel, and other heat-sink-acting infrastructure.
Today we look at data from the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) going back almost 80 years.
Hearing all the claims about a rapidly warming world from the media, many readers would think that there must be warming happening there as well. The data have a surprise in store.
Summer
Now that summer has ended, we plot the latest data to see if summers have indeed been warming at this island.
As the above data show, there has been virtually no trend at all over the past 80 years. Warming? Still no sign of it at all.
Winter
Next, we look at the mean winter temperatures at this location since 1947:
Like summer, also winter has shown no long-term trend one way or the other. Where’s the bad climate change news here?
Annual
To round out the analysis and to summarize, we plot the annual mean temperature data recorded for Hachjojima:
Interestingly, the annual temperature behavior appears to follow a cyclic behavior that very much resembles some ocean-surface temperature cycles we see from around the globe, like the PDO or AMO.
Climate indeed changes, but what we see above it cannot be due to anything anthropogenic.
Read more at No Tricks Zone
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-09-07--Photosynthesis: The Unaccounted Climate Factor

Let us recall Al Gore ’ s famous graph showing the correlation between CO2 & global temperature ( shown above ) .
See : National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration , Temperature Change vs Carbon Dioxide , depicting 800,000 years ago until 2006 .
The graph was prominent in Gore ’ s film “ An Inconvenient Truth ” .
1 .
Problem in Correlation from 1960+ CO2 Spike : Temperature Change vs Carbon Dioxide extended , same graph now carried to 2020 .
The recent CO2 spike from 280ppm to 410ppm is not reflected in the temperature rise yet .
Hence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ House Gas ) theory appears to have a possible data disconnect .
2.Problems in Correlation from 1955+ Climate4you.com Global temperatures and CO2 , from 1955 to April , 2020 .
The first graph below shows a negative correlation from 1955 to 1975 , but a positive correlation from 1975 to 2006 , with a weaker correlation from 2006 to present day .
The second graph uses many different temperature sources and also shows a weaker correlation since 2006 .
Misleading Scales The relative scales ( ppm / oC ) for the prior 800k @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of 10.2 for the below 60 yr graph to show the desired correlation between CO2 and oC .
Changing relative scales to fit time periods misleads the relationship between CO2 and temperature .
3.Problem with Lagging CO2 on falling temperature and CO2 ppm – Skeptical Science , CO2 lags temperature by 600 – 1000 years as shown in graph below .
Another pro CO2 cause Real Climate.org , states : CO2 lag could be as low as 200 years or as high as 1000 years .
The lag is only on falling temperature @ @ @ @ @ @ @ below , not on rising temperature or CO2 ppm .
Prevailing CO2 Theory – tells us CO2 , as a Green House Gas , causes global warming .
If that were the case , then CO2 should lead temperature , not lag it , especially not by 200 – 1000 years – if the theory is correct .
The prevailing hypothesis that CO2 leads upon rising temperature and lags upon falling temperatures is too “ convenient ” and not supported by any CO2 GHG models .
Maybe CO2 should not be their claimed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( Orbital ) Cycles primarily drive Earth ’ s Climate on 100,000 year cycles , not man ’ s actions .
Per chart above for past 400k years ( and first 2 charts for 800k years ) , 3-4 periods have been warmer than present .
The geologic consensus is that Earth should be moving to a cooling cycle , which may be partially offset by anthropogenic ( man made ) warming .
The Greenhouse Effect comparison varies widely depending on sources .
However , consensus is that water vapor has 3-5 times @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wikipedia , Greenhouse Gas– Neutral Source- Water Vapor accounts for 36 – 72 % , CO2 only 9 – 26 % , per table below .
Also , “ Water vapor accounts for 66 – 85 % of the greenhouse effect when including clouds.
” • Digging in the Clay– Water Vapor accounts for 95 % , CO2 only 3.6 % , per first chart below .
• Yale , Climate Connections– CO2 proponent- “ Water vapor and clouds account for 66 – 85 % of the greenhouse effect.
” • ClimateData.Info- CO2 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , CO2 26 % , per last chart below .
Prevailing Explanation Is Questionable ?
– Water vapor condenses whereas CO2 requires much longer to be removed from the atmosphere .
True , however , water vapor is constantly being added also .
The reductions and additions are accounted in the “ GHG Effect ” calculations using the global average water vapor concentration .
The 85 – 95 % magnitude of water vapor vs CO2 appears to discount the prevailing theory that CO2 GHG alone causes global warming .
Maybe a different “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ concentration ?
A 200ppm CO2 increase likely did not completely cause the temperature spike .
The vast majority of earth ’ s heat absorption eventually results in vaporizing water .
As an example , we have all observed how much more temperature varies between night and day in a dry desert vs a humid ocean beach .
We should instead investigate the causes of higher Water Vapor content in the atmosphere .
Prevailing explanation – Anthropogenic emissions of CO2 , methane , and other gases are warming the Earth .
Rising average temperature @ @ @ @ @ @ @ water vapor concentrations , which results in additional warming .
Offsetting- more water vapor produces more clouds which reflect more sun energy which decreases temperatures .
The net effect is not quantified in models because the earth ’ s climate system is too complex to model .
5.Problem- Climate Models Overestimate Temperature Rise– Model validity is only demonstrated by accurate projections .
Per Real Climate.org graph below , of the > 102 climate models , almost all have predicted more rise than observed over the last 15 years .
The earth ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ completely due to the complexity of interacting parameters .
Possibly other factors exist beyond “ simplistic ” CO2 GHG alone ?
This means that the reactants , six carbon dioxide molecules and six water molecules , are converted by light energy captured by chlorophyll ( implied by the arrow ) into a sugar molecule and six oxygen molecules , the products .
Effectively , man and animals generate CO2 emissions by consuming O2 for energy release .
Alternatively , plant life generates O2 by consuming CO2 and water and absorbing light energy .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ estimate Phytoplankton contribute 50 – 85 % of O2 in the atmosphere and consequently contribute 50– 85 % of CO2 reduction .
Other plants and trees contribute the remaining 15 – 50 % CO2 reduction .
The below 2010 graphs from Nature publication shows a > 60 % decline in global phytoplankton since 1960 ( commensurate with the global temperature increase ) .
The X-scale is at bottom right , years 1900 – 2010 .
The global temperature rise is partially caused by a decrease in ocean phytoplankton over the last 60 years @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , less forests , and industrial fishing and farming ) .
No earlier or longer period graphs exist of Earth phytoplankton because data is difficult to obtain for global oceans and waters .
However , data difficulty does not make the photosynthesis theory less valid…probably more valid , should be researched more .
Decrease in phytoplankton Generalized Additive Model estimates of yearly average Chlorophyll as discrete points or smooth function lines is presented for each region .
For the initial year of each graph , the arithmetic average is presented , rather than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tick-marks on the x axis .
Carbon Balance Validates & Quantifies Photosynthesis Theory Below chart is from Oak Ridge National Laboratories ( units in gigatons of carbon annually , 1980 estimates , admittedly needs updating ) .
Prior to man ’ s fossil fuel consumption , photosynthesis maintained the atmospheric CO2 balance for millions of years through the chemical reaction above .
Per chart below : • Only 4.8 % Photosynthesis reduction is equivalent to all CO2 emissions , per chart ( 5.3 /110 = 4.8 % ) .
Botanist consensus is that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ almost definite .
CO2 emissions have increased since 1980 , but so has photosynthesis reduction .
Theory remains valid .
• 110 tons from photosynthesis * ( 50 % +85 % / 2 ) photosynthesis from phytoplankton * 60 % phytoplankton reduction = 6 gigatons carbon reduction loss from 60 % phytoplankton reduction….7.6 times larger than the 5.9 gigatons from fossil fuel emissions per chart .
Conclusion- Photosynthesis reduction yields more atmospheric CO2 than anthropogenic CO2 emissions .
• Geologic History Fit The temperature graph on page 1 showed the planet has been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ years .
Man ’ s CO2 emissions do not explain these 4 temperature spikes .
Probable explanation- Natural photosynthesis reduction contributed to the 4 spikes as shown in the higher CO2 which consequently means less plant life / photosynthesis .
Conclusion- Natural photosynthesis reduction definitely contributed to geologic warming periods more than anthropogenic CO2 emissions .
• Time Lag Fit The photosynthesis theory better fits the lagging CO2 data since the loss of plants eventually yields a lagging increase in atmospheric CO2 per the CO2 balance above .
The oceans contain 85 % @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a 1990 scientific paper , University of Miami .
Dead phytoplankton sink to ocean bottoms sequestering carbon for hundreds of years , creating the atmospheric CO2 time lag in the huge ocean reservoir .
Secondly , the lack of lag on increasing temperature and CO2 ppm fits only with photosynthesis reduction .
This no time lag during increasing temperatures followed by time lag during decreasing temperatures is specific to the photosynthesis theory only .
No other AGW theory fits this geologic data .
• Water vapor ( primary GHG , not CO2 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s rays ( less water vaporization ) and consuming water , photosynthesis reduction has a bigger GHG effect .
This proposed photosynthesis theory rectifies the five problems detailed above with the prevailing CO2 GHG theory and fits historical records and available data .
Consequently , photosynthesis reduction theory is worthy of serious consideration .
CO2 is a Net Benefit CO2 works with photosynthesis to green and cool the planet per calculations from Dr Pierre R Latour , 2014 .
Higher CO2 yields global greening ( plant fertilization ) per a 2017 Nature journal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ greenness over global dry lands is probably caused by this higher CO2 effect on plant water savings , yielding soil water increases per a 2016 Nature journal article .
A United Nations ( UN ) climate scientist , Dr Indur Goklany , in a 2014 article , agrees that the rising CO2 is currently net beneficial for both humanity and the biosphere by fertilizing plants and increasing crop yields by 10 – 15 % .
Rising CO2 emissions prevent the worst parts of global warming per researchers from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
US Navy submarines limit CO2 < 8000 ppm because it displaces O2 .
Breathing into a paper bag yields even higher ppms , not harmful .
Conclusion- CO2 is a harmless green plant food , not a pollutant to be regulated .
Proposed Solution General agreement is that we need a “ Greener ” planet .
More phytoplankton and other plants are needed to consume CO2 , absorb the sun ’ s rays and reduce water vapor .
Photosynthesis will increase and may reduce global temperatures and consume CO2 emissions .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of dollars on ‘ climate change ’ for the purpose of Greening the Earth , not reducing CO2 emissions .
Multiple Causes Require Multiple Solutions The supposed climate problem is complex with many variables , many contributory factors and not all the data is available .
While a lot of data is contradictory there is no compelling case for merely eliminating CO2 emissions from fossil fuels .
This proposed “ anthropogenic photosynthesis theory ” is a novel concept not identified by this author elsewhere .
The only loosely related claim is that higher @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ocean and surface water pollution to increase photosynthesis , particularly overseas • Research options such as iron fertilization of oceans to increase phytoplankton : 1 .
Live Science 2012 .
2 .
Science 2008 .
Potential negative side effects : 1 .
Stimulates toxic algae blooms ( red tides ) .
2 .
Causes the production of nitrogen oxides , a more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide .
3 .
Sucks oxygen out of the water as the algae decompose creating dead zones .
• Research photosynthesis acceleration for higher yields .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ November 2019 ) in the journal Nature reveals the structure of cytochrome b6f – the protein complex that significantly influences plant growth via photosynthesis .
This protein could be modified for higher crop and phytoplankton yields .
Summary The above is a simple outline of an alternative theory while the prevailing CO2 GHG theory is being increasingly disputed and abandoned .
Alternative theories must now be considered and money spent on failed greenhouse gas models would be better spent testing alternative models ( including the above photosynthesis theory ) notwithstanding consensus obsession with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the author : David Motes PE is an Oil & Gas Process / Facilities Engineer from Houston , Texas now retired after a career at Exxon Mobil .
He also holds an MBA from the University of New Orleans .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Photosynthesis: The Unaccounted Climate Factor
Written by David Motes
Let us recall Al Gore’s famous graph showing the correlation between CO2 & global temperature (shown above). See: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Temperature Change vs Carbon Dioxide, depicting 800,000 years ago until 2006. The graph was prominent in Gore’s film “An Inconvenient Truth”.
1. Problem in Correlation from 1960+ CO2 Spike: Temperature Change vs Carbon Dioxide extended, same graph now carried to 2020. The recent CO2 spike from 280ppm to 410ppm is not reflected in the temperature rise yet. Hence, the prevailing CO2 GHG (Green House Gas) theory appears to have a possible data disconnect.
2.Problems in Correlation from 1955+ Climate4you.com Global temperatures and CO2, from 1955 to April, 2020. The first graph below shows a negative correlation from 1955 to 1975, but a positive correlation from 1975 to 2006, with a weaker correlation from 2006 to present day. The second graph uses many different temperature sources and also shows a weaker correlation since 2006.
Misleading Scales The relative scales (ppm / oC) for the prior 800k yr graph were increased by a factor of 10.2 for the below 60 yr graph to show the desired correlation between CO2 and oC. Changing relative scales to fit time periods misleads the relationship between CO2 and temperature.
3.Problem with Lagging CO2 on falling temperature and CO2 ppm – Skeptical Science, CO2 lags temperature by 600 – 1000 years as shown in graph below. Another pro CO2 cause Real Climate.org, states: CO2 lag could be as low as 200 years or as high as 1000 years. The lag is only on falling temperature and CO2 ppm as shown in graph below, not on rising temperature or CO2 ppm.
Prevailing CO2 Theory – tells us CO2, as a Green House Gas, causes global warming. If that were the case, then CO2 should lead temperature, not lag it, especially not by 200 – 1000 years – if the theory is correct. The prevailing hypothesis that CO2 leads upon rising temperature and lags upon falling temperatures is too “convenient” and not supported by any CO2 GHG models. Maybe CO2 should not be their claimed only cause of global warming?
Milankovitch (Orbital) Cycles primarily drive Earth’s Climate on 100,000 year cycles, not man’s actions. Per chart above for past 400k years (and first 2 charts for 800k years), 3-4 periods have been warmer than present. The geologic consensus is that Earth should be moving to a cooling cycle, which may be partially offset by anthropogenic (man made) warming.
4.Problem- Water Vapor Is a 3-5 Times Stronger GHG Than CO2
The Greenhouse Effect comparison varies widely depending on sources. However, consensus is that water vapor has 3-5 times stronger GHG effect than CO2:
Wikipedia, Greenhouse Gas– Neutral Source- Water Vapor accounts for 36 – 72%, CO2 only 9 – 26%, per table below. Also, “Water vapor accounts for 66 – 85% of the greenhouse effect when including clouds.” Digging in the Clay– Water Vapor accounts for 95%, CO2 only 3.6%, per first chart below. GeoCraft.com, “Water Vapor accounts for 95%, CO2 only 0.12%.” Yale, Climate Connections– CO2 proponent- “Water vapor and clouds account for 66 – 85% of the greenhouse effect.” ClimateData.Info- CO2 proponent- Water Vapor accounts for 60%, CO2 26%, per last chart below.
Prevailing Explanation Is Questionable? – Water vapor condenses whereas CO2 requires much longer to be removed from the atmosphere. True, however, water vapor is constantly being added also. The reductions and additions are accounted in the “GHG Effect” calculations using the global average water vapor concentration. The 85 – 95% magnitude of water vapor vs CO2 appears to discount the prevailing theory that CO2 GHG alone causes global warming. Maybe a different “anthropogenic cause” is increasing water vapor concentration?
A 200ppm CO2 increase likely did not completely cause the temperature spike. The vast majority of earth’s heat absorption eventually results in vaporizing water. As an example, we have all observed how much more temperature varies between night and day in a dry desert vs a humid ocean beach. We should instead investigate the causes of higher Water Vapor content in the atmosphere.
Prevailing explanation – Anthropogenic emissions of CO2, methane, and other gases are warming the Earth. Rising average temperature increases water evaporation rates, which increases water vapor concentrations, which results in additional warming. Offsetting- more water vapor produces more clouds which reflect more sun energy which decreases temperatures. The net effect is not quantified in models because the earth’s climate system is too complex to model.
5.Problem- Climate Models Overestimate Temperature Rise– Model validity is only demonstrated by accurate projections. Per Real Climate.org graph below, of the >102 climate models, almost all have predicted more rise than observed over the last 15 years. The earth’s climate system is almost impossible to model completely due to the complexity of interacting parameters. Possibly other factors exist beyond “simplistic” CO2 GHG alone?
Alternative Theory
Anthropogenic photosynthesis reduction is also causing global warming?
Photosynthesis Defined – Photosynthesis chemical reaction is commonly written as:
6CO2 + 6H2O + light energy → C6H12O6 + 6O2.
This means that the reactants, six carbon dioxide molecules and six water molecules, are converted by light energy captured by chlorophyll (implied by the arrow) into a sugar molecule and six oxygen molecules, the products.
Effectively, man and animals generate CO2 emissions by consuming O2 for energy release. Alternatively, plant life generates O2 by consuming CO2 and water and absorbing light energy.
Photosynthesis reduces warming in 3 ways:
Absorbing light energy, also creates less water vaporization Sequestering CO2 Reducing water vapor (the primary GHG) by absorbing sun’s rays.
Phytoplankton is the Primary Photosynthesis Driver- Scientists estimate Phytoplankton contribute 50 – 85% of O2 in the atmosphere and consequently contribute 50– 85% of CO2 reduction. Other plants and trees contribute the remaining 15 – 50% CO2 reduction. The below 2010 graphs from Nature publication shows a >60% decline in global phytoplankton since 1960 (commensurate with the global temperature increase). The X-scale is at bottom right, years 1900 – 2010.
The global temperature rise is partially caused by a decrease in ocean phytoplankton over the last 60 years (modern era with less vibrant oceans, less forests, and industrial fishing and farming). No earlier or longer period graphs exist of Earth phytoplankton because data is difficult to obtain for global oceans and waters. However, data difficulty does not make the photosynthesis theory less valid…probably more valid, should be researched more.
Decrease in phytoplankton Generalized Additive Model estimates of yearly average Chlorophyll as discrete points or smooth function lines is presented for each region. For the initial year of each graph, the arithmetic average is presented, rather than mean. Data availability is displayed as tick-marks on the x axis.
Carbon Balance Validates & Quantifies Photosynthesis Theory Below chart is from Oak Ridge National Laboratories (units in gigatons of carbon annually, 1980 estimates, admittedly needs updating). Prior to man’s fossil fuel consumption, photosynthesis maintained the atmospheric CO2 balance for millions of years through the chemical reaction above. Per chart below:
Only 4.8% Photosynthesis reduction is equivalent to all CO2 emissions, per chart (5.3 /110 = 4.8%). Botanist consensus is that >4.8% reduction since 1980 is almost definite. CO2 emissions have increased since 1980, but so has photosynthesis reduction. Theory remains valid. 110 tons from photosynthesis * (50%+85% / 2) photosynthesis from phytoplankton * 60% phytoplankton reduction = 6 gigatons carbon reduction loss from 60% phytoplankton reduction….7.6 times larger than the 5.9 gigatons from fossil fuel emissions per chart. Conclusion- Photosynthesis reduction yields more atmospheric CO2 than anthropogenic CO2 emissions.
Photosynthesis Theory Fits Historical Data Unlike the CO2 GHG Theory
Geologic History Fit The temperature graph on page 1 showed the planet has been warmer 4 times over the past 800,000 years. Man’s CO2 emissions do not explain these 4 temperature spikes. Probable explanation- Natural photosynthesis reduction contributed to the 4 spikes as shown in the higher CO2 which consequently means less plant life / photosynthesis. Conclusion- Natural photosynthesis reduction definitely contributed to geologic warming periods more than anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Time Lag Fit The photosynthesis theory better fits the lagging CO2 data since the loss of plants eventually yields a lagging increase in atmospheric CO2 per the CO2 balance above. The oceans contain 85% of planetary surface carbon per Figure 6 of a 1990 scientific paper, University of Miami. Dead phytoplankton sink to ocean bottoms sequestering carbon for hundreds of years, creating the atmospheric CO2 time lag in the huge ocean reservoir. Secondly, the lack of lag on increasing temperature and CO2 ppm fits only with photosynthesis reduction. This no time lag during increasing temperatures followed by time lag during decreasing temperatures is specific to the photosynthesis theory only. No other AGW theory fits this geologic data. Water vapor (primary GHG, not CO2) Fit By absorbing the sun’s rays (less water vaporization) and consuming water, photosynthesis reduction has a bigger GHG effect.
Conclusion
This proposed photosynthesis theory rectifies the five problems detailed above with the prevailing CO2 GHG theory and fits historical records and available data. Consequently, photosynthesis reduction theory is worthy of serious consideration.
CO2 is a Net Benefit CO2 works with photosynthesis to green and cool the planet per calculations from Dr Pierre R Latour, 2014. Higher CO2 yields global greening (plant fertilization) per a 2017 Nature journal article. A positive trend in vegetation greenness over global dry lands is probably caused by this higher CO2 effect on plant water savings, yielding soil water increases per a 2016 Nature journal article.
A United Nations (UN) climate scientist, Dr Indur Goklany, in a 2014 article, agrees that the rising CO2 is currently net beneficial for both humanity and the biosphere by fertilizing plants and increasing crop yields by 10 – 15%. Rising CO2 emissions prevent the worst parts of global warming per researchers from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the University of California, Irvine. US Navy submarines limit CO2 < 8000 ppm because it displaces O2. Breathing into a paper bag yields even higher ppms, not harmful. Conclusion- CO2 is a harmless green plant food, not a pollutant to be regulated.
Proposed Solution General agreement is that we need a “Greener” planet. More phytoplankton and other plants are needed to consume CO2, absorb the sun’s rays and reduce water vapor. Photosynthesis will increase and may reduce global temperatures and consume CO2 emissions. We would be smarter to spend the trillions of dollars on ‘climate change’ for the purpose of Greening the Earth, not reducing CO2 emissions.
Multiple Causes Require Multiple Solutions The supposed climate problem is complex with many variables, many contributory factors and not all the data is available. While a lot of data is contradictory there is no compelling case for merely eliminating CO2 emissions from fossil fuels. This proposed “anthropogenic photosynthesis theory”is a novel concept not identified by this author elsewhere. The only loosely related claim is that higher temperatures may reduce photosynthesis.
Proposal Globally, we should:
Concentrate on a “Greener Planet”, not blindly reducing CO2 emissions Reduce ocean and surface water pollution to increase photosynthesis, particularly overseas Research options such as iron fertilization of oceans to increase phytoplankton: 1. Live Science 2012. 2. Science 2008. Potential negative side effects: 1. Stimulates toxic algae blooms (red tides). 2. Causes the production of nitrogen oxides, a more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. 3. Sucks oxygen out of the water as the algae decompose creating dead zones. Research photosynthesis acceleration for higher yields. Example A University of Sheffield study (November 2019) in the journal Nature reveals the structure of cytochrome b6f – the protein complex that significantly influences plant growth via photosynthesis. This protein could be modified for higher crop and phytoplankton yields. Increase green power sources (windmills, solar, nuclear, etc).
Summary The above is a simple outline of an alternative theory while the prevailing CO2 GHG theory is being increasingly disputed and abandoned. Alternative theories must now be considered and money spent on failed greenhouse gas models would be better spent testing alternative models (including the above photosynthesis theory) notwithstanding consensus obsession with focusing on CO2 emissions reduction.
Acknowledgments Tom Crosier, Dwayne Stewart, Shep Barnum, Steve Fantazia, Rick Garnett, Rudy Dismuke, and David Watts. Online profile: David Motes LinkedIn
About the author: David Motes PE is an Oil & Gas Process / Facilities Engineer from Houston, Texas now retired after a career at Exxon Mobil. He also holds an MBA from the University of New Orleans.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related