principiascientificinternational--2020-10-12--WuhanGates – Pandemic Planned for Decades?

The governments love pandemics .
They love pandemics for the same reason they love war .
It gives them the ability to impose controls on the population that the population would otherwise never accept—creating institutions and mechanisms for orchestrating and imposing obedience .
I will tell you something : it is a mystery to me , how all these big , important people like Bill Gates and Tony Fauci were planning and thinking about this pandemic for decades—planning it so that we would all be safe when the pandemic finally came .
And yet , now that it is here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ know what they are talking about » .
These words were spoken a few weeks ago in Berlin by Robert F. Kennedy jr , son of the late former United States Attorney General and nephew of the assassinated President John F. Kennedy , during a protest against the handling of the emergency from Covid- 19 in which more than 10 thousand people took part .
Let ’ s start from them to make a synthesis of 30 reportages called CoronaVirus Bio-Arma , the first ten , and then WuhanGates , the other 20 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that all the secrets of this pandemic widely prophesied by illustrious Democratic exponents ( Donor Bill Gates , former President Barack Obama , former CIA Deputy Director Avril Haines ) were to be sought in the perverse intertwining between the Wuhan Institute of Virology , prime suspect for its very dangerous experiments on Coronavirus of the SARS strain infected with HIV .
It was already funded by the European Commission chaired by the Italian democrat Romano Prodi in 2004 and then by the USAID projects , the American government agency used as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in its international operations , and supported by the Bill & Melinda Foundation during the Obama administration , since 2009 .
« They can not tell you what the case fatality rate for COVID is , that ’ s basic .
They can not give us a PCR test that actually works .
They don ’ t have—they have to change the definition of COVID on the death certificates , constantly , to make it look more and more dangerous .
The one thing they are good at is pumping up fear » @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , before recalling the famous speech delivered by JFK in the same city with the legendary phrase “ Ich bin ein Berliner ” ( I am a Berliner ) .
To his words were added those of Pope Francis I who , awakened from a long torpor , pointed the finger at the affairs of the Big Pharma , unscrupulous and shady as we have demonstrated in the many investigations that we will summarize below , without naming them .
« The crisis we are experiencing due to the pandemic affects everyone – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which was held on the morning of Wednesday 9 September in the Courtyard of San Damaso of the Vatican Apostolic Palace – We can come out better if we all seek good together common .
Unfortunately , we are witnessing the emergence of partisan interests .
For example , there are those who would like to appropriate possible solutions , as in the case of vaccines and then sell them to others .
Some take advantage of the situation to foment divisions : to seek economic or political advantages , generating or increasing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about the suffering of others , they pass over and go their own way » .
A “ trait d ’ union ” between the two speeches came from the White House the disruptive one of American President Donald Trump who , to get out of the media impasse caused by the ambiguous words spoken about the fallen soldiers , pointed the finger at the Department of State as he had already done a few months ago by correlating Dr. Fauci ( NIAID director and supervisor of all military bacteriological experiments from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ State in a joke during a press conference .
As reported in great detail by Politico webmedia , Trump said « leaders at the Pentagon probably weren ’ t “ in love with me ” because “ they want to do nothing but fight wars so that all of those wonderful companies that make the bombs and make the planes and make everything else stay happy ” » .
« “ Some people don ’ t like to come home , some people like to continue to spend money , ” Trump said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ another , that ’ s what it was.
” – added Politico about the statement – He asserted that while U.S. troops largely support him , he does not receive the same affinity from the top .
He made the comment as he advocated for the removal of American troops from “ endless wars ” and lambasted NATO allies who “ rip us off ” » .
Wars like pandemics , missiles like bacteriological weapons which the US Navy was proud of since 1952 with a Hollywood-style documentary , declassified a few years @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on its YouTube channel .
All for a question of money and power .
Kennedy has been portrayed as a conspiracy theorist by the mainstream media although he has repeatedly stated that he does not belong to the “ no vax ” but that he is fighting for safe pediatric vaccines in reference to the NCVIA ( National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act ) of 1986 .
As an activist attorney and representative of the Informed Consent Action Network ( ICAN ) , supported by 55 organizations representing more than 5 million people , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ delivering a letter to Don Wright , MD , MPH , secretary of the HHS at that time , stating that the HHS ( Health and Human Services ; Department of Health and Human Services ) had failed in its duty to conduct the scientific research necessary to prove the safety of vaccines as required by law and that he should have acted immediately to remedy this negligence .
Also because vaccines are currently the only pharmaceutical product on the US market that is immune to vaccine injury lawsuits , as a result @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( VICA ) approved by Congress and signed into law by then President Ronald Reagan .
The dispute between ICAN and HHS began in 2017 and ended on July 13 , 2018 when the Kennedy-sponsored association won this historic legal battle thanks to the ruling of the District Court of the Southern District of New York .
« ICAN was therefore forced to file a lawsuit to force HHS to either provide copies of its biennial vaccine safety reports to Congress or admit it never filed these reports .
The result of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and shockingly admit that it never , not even once , submitted a single biennial report to Congress detailing the improvements in vaccine safety .
This speaks volumes to the seriousness by which vaccine safety is treated at HHS and heightens the concern that HHS doesn ’ t have a clue as to the actual safety profile of the now 29 doses , and growing , of vaccines given by one year of age » wrote the association commenting on the sentence .
« In contrast , HHS takes the other portions of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine uptake , very seriously , spending billions annually and generating a steady stream of reports on how to improve vaccine uptake .
Regrettably , HHS has chosen to focus on its obligation to increase vaccine uptake and defend against any claim vaccines cause harm in the National Injury Vaccine Compensation Program ( aka , the Vaccine Court ) to such a degree that it has abandoned its vaccine safety responsibilities .
If HHS is not , as confirmed in Court this week , even fulfilling the simple task of filing a biennial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is little hope that HHS is actually tackling the much harder job of actually improving vaccine safety » it still noticed Kennedy ’ s Ican .
If this happens in the developed United States of America , what can happen in the poor countries of Asia and Africa used by USAID projects as guinea pigs ?
It may happen what happened in Georgia where in a laboratory financed by the Pentagon ’ s DTRA agency but managed by the contractor GILEAD , the big pharma that became rich with Remdesivir against Covid-19 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a few months enough to induce Russia to advance suspicions on the testing of bacteriological weapons , such as , according to now multiple authoritative sources , is the SARS-2 virus , believed to be a genetically modified organism in the laboratory by 15 scientists , a former director of British counter-intelligence , the former president of Iran and the metropolitan cardinal of Sri Lanka .
« We want health officials who don ’ t have financial entanglements with the pharmaceutical industry—who are working for us .
We want officials who care about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not about pharmaceutical profits or government control » further said in Berlin Bobby Kennedy Jr. that several times in other official speeches he accused Anthony Fauci of having specific interests in the deal .
Fauci in addition to being the consultant to the White House on the Covid-19 emergency and for many years director of the NIAID ( National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ) .
« Tony Fauci has many , many vaccine patents … and there ’ s a vaccine patent he has that is a way of packaging a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ protein sheet … and then deliver it through a vaccine … somehow he ended up owning that patent … Tony Fauci will be able to cash… .
So Fauci ’ s agency will collect half of the royalties for that vaccine [ related to the coronavirus ] » even declared also as reported by the website The Gateway Pundit which quotes a speech by Kennedy in which the financial connections between Fauci and Bill Gates ( financier of various experiments ) shared by NIAID ) .
« And the pandemic is a crisis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these policies .
It gives them the ability to obliterate the middle class , to destroy the institutions of democracy , to shift all of our wealth , from all of us , to a handful of billionaires to make themselves rich by impoverishing the rest of us .
And the only thing that ’ s between them and our children is this crowd who has come to Berlin .
We are going to show them !
We are going to demand our democracy back !
Thank you very much for fighting !
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ acclaimed by the cheers of the people .
Our way of fighting has been and is to demonstrate in detail the interconnections between transnational military projects and big pharma that this Covid-19 virus , in some genotypes highly lethal if not treated properly and in others not , was created in the laboratory and widespread to sow panic on the earth in order to enrich the shareholders of the big pharma , the same as the arms lobbies , and to impose that New World Order widely announced by scholars of Freemasonry before @ @ @ @ @ @ @ waste of time .
Here is a micro-synthesis of the summary reports of our investigations that confirm Kennedy ’ s theories in facts .
The American lawyer Francis Boyle , author of the Biological Weapons Convention ( BWC ) approved by the US Congress in 1989 , was the first to consider Covid-19 a virus who escaped from the laboratory of the Wuhan Institute of Virology .
But in the course of the reportages it was discovered that the first superviruses were actually built in North Carolina University during the Obama administration , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic and financed the suspicious exercises in October 2019 in which the former deputy director of the CIA , Avril Haines , swas the protagonist .
She later became Deputy National Security Advisor to the White House by virtue of her historic professional collaboration with Joe Biden .
It was she who prophesied in 2018 the need for “ a world order ” against the risks of new pandemics from respiratory diseases .
Prophecies that smell of conspiracy .
The global immunization plan wanted by Obama saw Italy become a “ pilot country @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Washington and Rome and paved the way for the lucrative business of London ’ s GlaxoSmithKline , controlled by shareholders of the Weapons Lobby and already convicted in various judicial investigations , administered by a director of Microsoft Corporation confirming the connection between big pharma and Bill Gates .
Among the financiers of the world vaccination plan is the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia which is in business with GSK itself thanks to the Arab branch enriched thanks to a capital increase of the English parent company .
A whirlwind of money as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of 2015 funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and by the USAID-EPT-PREDICT synergy supported by the EcoHealth Alliance ( EHA ) of New York , of which Johnson & Johnson is a sponsor recipient of a billion dollars for vaccine development after the outbreak of the pandemic .
REVELATIONS OF HER MAJESTY FORMER 007′ DIRECTOR After the American bacteriological weapons expert Francis Boyle , the former president of Iran and the metropolitan cardinal of Sri Lanka also the former director of British counterintelligence MI 6 Richard Dearlove , claims that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ does so on the basis of research carried out by two biologists , one English and the other Danish , whose publication has been delayed for fear of the Scandinavian to sign it and about which nothing will be known .
The news is reported by various newspapers in the United Kingdom but only very few in Italy and soon ends up in oblivion despite the authority of the person who made these very heavy statements .
His revelations actually confirm the study carried out by nine researchers from New Delhi in turn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Nobel Prize in Medicine for the discovery of HIV in 1983 .
His study , registered under the name of bio-mathematician Jean-Claude Perez , raises a flurry of controversy and the mainstream media attack the French scientist who knows China well having worked at Shanghai ’ s Jao Tong University after a life spent at Pasteur Institute of Paris which played a fundamental role in the first research on the SARS virus in 2004 in Wuhan .
In the WuhanGates 4 report we highlighted these discoveries by also explaining the concept of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or the enhancement of the bacteriological load similar to the concept of uranium enrichment for nuclear warheads .
THE CHINA-USA DEAL WITH CIA AND GATES Montagnier argues two things of unprecedented gravity : SARS-2 was created in the laboratory with the insert of HIV sequences as already demonstrated by the study of the Indians that was mysteriously withdrawn , but he also claims that it is a deal between China and States United .
( read more ) WUHAN-GATES – 9 .
THE PROOFS : HIV inserted in SARS chimeric virus in 2007 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Funds WUHAN-GATES – 11 .
HIV INSIDE SARS-2 : Dangerous Experiments , Scientists Dead & Spies ’ Ring in Canada , China and US Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio © COPYRIGHT GOSPA NEWS no reproduction without authorization – Versione originale in Italiano THE GATEWAY – KENNEDY CLAIMS FAUCI AND GATES WILL MAKE BILLIONS About the author : Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio , Director , Gospa News .
Fabio is Director and Editor of Gospa News ; a Christian Information Journal .
Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio , born on 24/2/1967 in Borgosesia , started working @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 19 years old in the alpine area of Valsesia , Piedmont , his birth region in Italy .
After studying literature and history at the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Milan , he became deputy director of a local newspaper and specialized in judicial reporting .
For about 15 years he is a correspondent from Northern Italy for the Italian newspapers Libero and Il Giornale , also writing important revelations on the Ustica massacre , a report on Freemasonry and organized crime .
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work @ @ @ @ @ @ @ SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

WuhanGates – Pandemic Planned for Decades?
Written by Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
The governments love pandemics. They love pandemics for the same reason they love war. It gives them the ability to impose controls on the population that the population would otherwise never accept—creating institutions and mechanisms for orchestrating and imposing obedience.
I will tell you something: it is a mystery to me, how all these big, important people like Bill Gates and Tony Fauci were planning and thinking about this pandemic for decades—planning it so that we would all be safe when the pandemic finally came. And yet, now that it is here, they don’t seem to know what they are talking about».
These words were spoken a few weeks ago in Berlin by Robert F. Kennedy jr, son of the late former United States Attorney General and nephew of the assassinated President John F. Kennedy, during a protest against the handling of the emergency from Covid- 19 in which more than 10 thousand people took part.
Let’s start from them to make a synthesis of 30 reportages called CoronaVirus Bio-Arma, the first ten, and then WuhanGates, the other 20, when it became clear to us that all the secrets of this pandemic widely prophesied by illustrious Democratic exponents (Donor Bill Gates, former President Barack Obama, former CIA Deputy Director Avril Haines) were to be sought in the perverse intertwining between the Wuhan Institute of Virology, prime suspect for its very dangerous experiments on Coronavirus of the SARS strain infected with HIV.
It was already funded by the European Commission chaired by the Italian democrat Romano Prodi in 2004 and then by the USAID projects, the American government agency used as a financial tool by the Central Intelligence Agency in its international operations, and supported by the Bill & Melinda Foundation during the Obama administration, since 2009.
«They cannot tell you what the case fatality rate for COVID is, that’s basic. They cannot give us a PCR test that actually works. They don’t have—they have to change the definition of COVID on the death certificates, constantly, to make it look more and more dangerous. The one thing they are good at is pumping up fear» Kennedy highlighted in front of the Berliners, before recalling the famous speech delivered by JFK in the same city with the legendary phrase “Ich bin ein Berliner” (I am a Berliner).
To his words were added those of Pope Francis I who, awakened from a long torpor, pointed the finger at the affairs of the Big Pharma, unscrupulous and shady as we have demonstrated in the many investigations that we will summarize below, without naming them.
«The crisis we are experiencing due to the pandemic affects everyone – Pope Francis said at the General Audience which was held on the morning of Wednesday 9 September in the Courtyard of San Damaso of the Vatican Apostolic Palace – We can come out better if we all seek good together common. Unfortunately, we are witnessing the emergence of partisan interests. For example, there are those who would like to appropriate possible solutions, as in the case of vaccines and then sell them to others. Some take advantage of the situation to foment divisions: to seek economic or political advantages, generating or increasing conflicts. Others simply do not care about the suffering of others, they pass over and go their own way».
A “trait d’union” between the two speeches came from the White House the disruptive one of American President Donald Trump who, to get out of the media impasse caused by the ambiguous words spoken about the fallen soldiers, pointed the finger at the Department of State as he had already done a few months ago by correlating Dr. Fauci (NIAID director and supervisor of all military bacteriological experiments from the Obama era onwards) with the Deep State in a joke during a press conference.
As reported in great detail by Politico webmedia, Trump said «leaders at the Pentagon probably weren’t “in love with me” because “they want to do nothing but fight wars so that all of those wonderful companies that make the bombs and make the planes and make everything else stay happy”».
«“Some people don’t like to come home, some people like to continue to spend money,” Trump said. “One cold-hearted globalist betrayal after another, that’s what it was.” – added Politico about the statement – He asserted that while U.S. troops largely support him, he does not receive the same affinity from the top. He made the comment as he advocated for the removal of American troops from “endless wars” and lambasted NATO allies who “rip us off”».
Wars like pandemics, missiles like bacteriological weapons which the US Navy was proud of since 1952 with a Hollywood-style documentary, declassified a few years ago and published exclusively by Gospa News on its YouTube channel. All for a question of money and power.
HISTORICAL SENTENCE ON VACCINES OBTAINED BY KENNEDY
Kennedy has been portrayed as a conspiracy theorist by the mainstream media although he has repeatedly stated that he does not belong to the “no vax” but that he is fighting for safe pediatric vaccines in reference to the NCVIA (National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act) of 1986.
As an activist attorney and representative of the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), supported by 55 organizations representing more than 5 million people, he had taken an unprecedented step in delivering a letter to Don Wright, MD, MPH, secretary of the HHS at that time, stating that the HHS (Health and Human Services; Department of Health and Human Services) had failed in its duty to conduct the scientific research necessary to prove the safety of vaccines as required by law and that he should have acted immediately to remedy this negligence.
Also because vaccines are currently the only pharmaceutical product on the US market that is immune to vaccine injury lawsuits, as a result of the 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act (VICA) approved by Congress and signed into law by then President Ronald Reagan.
The dispute between ICAN and HHS began in 2017 and ended on July 13, 2018 when the Kennedy-sponsored association won this historic legal battle thanks to the ruling of the District Court of the Southern District of New York.
«ICAN was therefore forced to file a lawsuit to force HHS to either provide copies of its biennial vaccine safety reports to Congress or admit it never filed these reports. The result of the lawsuit is that HHS had to finally and shockingly admit that it never, not even once, submitted a single biennial report to Congress detailing the improvements in vaccine safety. This speaks volumes to the seriousness by which vaccine safety is treated at HHS and heightens the concern that HHS doesn’t have a clue as to the actual safety profile of the now 29 doses, and growing, of vaccines given by one year of age» wrote the association commenting on the sentence.
«In contrast, HHS takes the other portions of the 1986 Act, which require promoting vaccine uptake, very seriously, spending billions annually and generating a steady stream of reports on how to improve vaccine uptake. Regrettably, HHS has chosen to focus on its obligation to increase vaccine uptake and defend against any claim vaccines cause harm in the National Injury Vaccine Compensation Program (aka, the Vaccine Court) to such a degree that it has abandoned its vaccine safety responsibilities. If HHS is not, as confirmed in Court this week, even fulfilling the simple task of filing a biennial report on vaccine safety improvements, there is little hope that HHS is actually tackling the much harder job of actually improving vaccine safety» it still noticed Kennedy’s Ican.
KENNEDY’S ACCUSATIONS TO FAUCI
If this happens in the developed United States of America, what can happen in the poor countries of Asia and Africa used by USAID projects as guinea pigs?
It may happen what happened in Georgia where in a laboratory financed by the Pentagon’s DTRA agency but managed by the contractor GILEAD, the big pharma that became rich with Remdesivir against Covid-19, where 72 human guinea pigs died in a few months enough to induce Russia to advance suspicions on the testing of bacteriological weapons, such as, according to now multiple authoritative sources, is the SARS-2 virus, believed to be a genetically modified organism in the laboratory by 15 scientists, a former director of British counter-intelligence, the former president of Iran and the metropolitan cardinal of Sri Lanka.
«We want health officials who don’t have financial entanglements with the pharmaceutical industry—who are working for us. We want officials who care about our children’s health, and not about pharmaceutical profits or government control» further said in Berlin Bobby Kennedy Jr. that several times in other official speeches he accused Anthony Fauci of having specific interests in the deal. Fauci in addition to being the consultant to the White House on the Covid-19 emergency and for many years director of the NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases).
«Tony Fauci has many, many vaccine patents … and there’s a vaccine patent he has that is a way of packaging a coronavirus with another vaccine … in a protein sheet … and then deliver it through a vaccine … somehow he ended up owning that patent … Tony Fauci will be able to cash…. So Fauci’s agency will collect half of the royalties for that vaccine [related to the coronavirus]» even declared also as reported by the website The Gateway Pundit which quotes a speech by Kennedy in which the financial connections between Fauci and Bill Gates (financier of various experiments) shared by NIAID).
«And the pandemic is a crisis of convenience—for the elites who are dictating these policies. It gives them the ability to obliterate the middle class, to destroy the institutions of democracy, to shift all of our wealth, from all of us, to a handful of billionaires to make themselves rich by impoverishing the rest of us. And the only thing that’s between them and our children is this crowd who has come to Berlin. We are going to show them! We are going to demand our democracy back! Thank you very much for fighting!”» concluded JFK’s grandson acclaimed by the cheers of the people.
Our way of fighting has been and is to demonstrate in detail the interconnections between transnational military projects and big pharma that this Covid-19 virus, in some genotypes highly lethal if not treated properly and in others not, was created in the laboratory and widespread to sow panic on the earth in order to enrich the shareholders of the big pharma, the same as the arms lobbies, and to impose that New World Order widely announced by scholars of Freemasonry before which every democratic election will be a waste of time.
Here is a micro-synthesis of the summary reports of our investigations that confirm Kennedy’s theories in facts.
CORONAVIRUS – 10: THE PLOT IN 100 LINES
The American lawyer Francis Boyle, author of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) approved by the US Congress in 1989, was the first to consider Covid-19 a virus who escaped from the laboratory of the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
But in the course of the reportages it was discovered that the first superviruses were actually built in North Carolina University during the Obama administration, funded by Bill Gates who predicted the pandemic and financed the suspicious exercises in October 2019 in which the former deputy director of the CIA, Avril Haines, swas the protagonist.
She later became Deputy National Security Advisor to the White House by virtue of her historic professional collaboration with Joe Biden. It was she who prophesied in 2018 the need for “a world order” against the risks of new pandemics from respiratory diseases. Prophecies that smell of conspiracy.
BIOWEAPON-VACCINES INTRIGUES AMONG CHINA, USA, CIA AND SAUDI
The global immunization plan wanted by Obama saw Italy become a “pilot country” in a synergy between the Dems of Washington and Rome and paved the way for the lucrative business of London’s GlaxoSmithKline, controlled by shareholders of the Weapons Lobby and already convicted in various judicial investigations, administered by a director of Microsoft Corporation confirming the connection between big pharma and Bill Gates.
Among the financiers of the world vaccination plan is the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia which is in business with GSK itself thanks to the Arab branch enriched thanks to a capital increase of the English parent company. A whirlwind of money as in the research projects on dangerous superviruses of 2015 funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and by the USAID-EPT-PREDICT synergy supported by the EcoHealth Alliance (EHA) of New York, of which Johnson & Johnson is a sponsor recipient of a billion dollars for vaccine development after the outbreak of the pandemic.
REVELATIONS OF HER MAJESTY FORMER 007′ DIRECTOR
After the American bacteriological weapons expert Francis Boyle, the former president of Iran and the metropolitan cardinal of Sri Lanka also the former director of British counterintelligence MI 6 Richard Dearlove, claims that SARS-Cov-2 is a genetically modified. It does so on the basis of research carried out by two biologists, one English and the other Danish, whose publication has been delayed for fear of the Scandinavian to sign it and about which nothing will be known.
The news is reported by various newspapers in the United Kingdom but only very few in Italy and soon ends up in oblivion despite the authority of the person who made these very heavy statements. His revelations actually confirm the study carried out by nine researchers from New Delhi in turn accredited by the French virologist Luc Montagnier, Nobel Prize in Medicine for the discovery of HIV in 1983.
His study, registered under the name of bio-mathematician Jean-Claude Perez, raises a flurry of controversy and the mainstream media attack the French scientist who knows China well having worked at Shanghai’s Jao Tong University after a life spent at Pasteur Institute of Paris which played a fundamental role in the first research on the SARS virus in 2004 in Wuhan.
In the WuhanGates 4 report we highlighted these discoveries by also explaining the concept of GOF, the gain of function, or the enhancement of the bacteriological load similar to the concept of uranium enrichment for nuclear warheads.
THE CHINA-USA DEAL WITH CIA AND GATES
Montagnier argues two things of unprecedented gravity: SARS-2 was created in the laboratory with the insert of HIV sequences as already demonstrated by the study of the Indians that was mysteriously withdrawn, but he also claims that it is a deal between China and States United. (read more)
WUHAN-GATES – 9. THE PROOFS: HIV inserted in SARS chimeric virus in 2007. Thanks to Australian & EU Commission Funds
WUHAN-GATES – 4. “Covid-19 manipulated, CHINA-US Hidden Affair”. Class-Action for Bio-Weapon in Texas
More Scientists Dead
WUHAN-GATES – 11. HIV INSIDE SARS-2: Dangerous Experiments, Scientists Dead & Spies’ Ring in Canada, China and US
POST CONTINUES HERE
Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
© COPYRIGHT GOSPA NEWS
no reproduction without authorization – Versione originale in Italiano
MAIN SOURCES
GOSPA NEWS – WUHAN.GATES REPORTS
GOSPA NEWS – CORONA VIRUS DOSSIER
GOSPA NEWS – WEAPONS’ LOBBY INVESTIGATIONS
ABSCONDO – ORIGINAL KENNEDY’S SPEECH IN BERLIN
POLITICO – TRUMP DISPARAGES PENTAGON CHIEFS
THE GATEWAY – KENNEDY CLAIMS FAUCI AND GATES WILL MAKE BILLIONS
About the author:Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio,Director , Gospa News. Fabio is Director and Editor of Gospa News; a Christian Information Journal. Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio, born on 24/2/1967 in Borgosesia, started working as a reporter since he was only 19 years old in the alpine area of Valsesia, Piedmont, his birth region in Italy. After studying literature and history at the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Milan, he became deputy director of a local newspaper and specialized in judicial reporting. For about 15 years he is a correspondent from Northern Italy for the Italian newspapers Libero and Il Giornale, also writing important revelations on the Ustica massacre, a report on Freemasonry and organized crime.
Read more here: www.veteranstoday.com
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-12--Ozone Hoax: Hole Now Twice the Size of the U.S.

Ozone Hoax : Hole Now Twice the Size of the U.S .
If you ’ ve been looking to cast yourself into a deep hole from which you can never return ( I have ! )
, the one in the ozone layeris a prime choice right now .
The hole in the atmosphere ’ s ozone layer just reached its maximum annual size , experts at European Union ’ s Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service ( ECMWF ) said on Tuesday .
The extent of the hole over Antarctica reached 8.8 million square miles ( 23 million square kilometers ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the largest and deepest ozone holes in recent history .
For context , that ’ s more than twice the size of the entire U.S .
Throw me in !
The ozone is the part of the planet ’ s atmosphere that absorbs most of the dangerous incoming ultraviolet radiation from the sun .
But humans ’ penchant for using ozone-depleting substances for refrigeration and air conditioning caused a hole in that layer to open up annually each year .
The alarming growth of the hole led world leaders to ban the ozone-depleting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ozone hole is still a huge problem that will take decades to totally heal .
The ozone hole forms when sunlight comes to the Antarctic region , and the light reacts with the ozone-depleting compounds that society has emitted over decades and have soared up into the freezing cold stratosphere .
When conditions up in the atmosphere are particularly icy , this chemical reaction thrives .
And this year , it got really , really cold due to a particularly strong polar vortex over the Antarctic .
It ’ s typical for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ events , but it generally becoming largest in October .
But just because it happens every year doesn ’ t mean it ’ s good .
2020 ’ s maximum extent was bigger and deeper than average.Vincent-Henri Peuch , director of Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service at ECMWF , said in a statement that it resembled the relatively big and deep hole seen in 2018 .
But weirdly , this year ’ s Big Hole followed last year ’ s small extent .
In fact , last year ’ s ozone hole was the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up relatively quickly .
“ There is much variability in how far ozone hole events develop each year , ” Peuch said .
Clearly !
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Ozone Hoax: Hole Now Twice the Size of the U.S.
Written by Dharna Noor
If you’ve been looking to cast yourself into a deep hole from which you can never return (I have!), the one in the ozone layeris a prime choice right now.
The hole in the atmosphere’s ozone layer just reached its maximum annual size, experts at European Union’s Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (ECMWF) said on Tuesday. The extent of the hole over Antarctica reached 8.8 million square miles (23 million square kilometers) this year, making it one of the largest and deepest ozone holes in recent history. For context, that’s more than twice the size of the entire U.S. Throw me in!
The ozone is the part of the planet’s atmosphere that absorbs most of the dangerous incoming ultraviolet radiation from the sun. But humans’ penchant for using ozone-depleting substances for refrigeration and air conditioning caused a hole in that layer to open up annually each year. The alarming growth of the hole led world leaders to ban the ozone-depleting chemicals in the 1980s, but the ozone hole is still a huge problem that will take decades to totally heal.
The ozone hole forms when sunlight comes to the Antarctic region, and the light reacts with the ozone-depleting compounds that society has emitted over decades and have soared up into the freezing cold stratosphere. When conditions up in the atmosphere are particularly icy, this chemical reaction thrives. And this year, it got really, really cold due to a particularly strong polar vortex over the Antarctic.
It’s typical for the hole to fluctuate in size with weather events, but it generally becoming largest in October. But just because it happens every year doesn’t mean it’s good. 2020’s maximum extent was bigger and deeper than average.Vincent-Henri Peuch, director of Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service at ECMWF, said in a statement that it resembled the relatively big and deep hole seen in 2018.
But weirdly, this year’s Big Hole followed last year’s small extent. In fact, last year’s ozone hole was the smallest minimum on record and it closed up relatively quickly.
“There is much variability in how far ozone hole events develop each year,” Peuch said. Clearly!
Read more at earther.gizmodo.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-12--COVID19 Hospital Beds Scam – update

COVID19 Hospital Beds Scam – update

Here is an update to my previous article , with additional quotes from our anonymous retired government scientist : “ I have alerted folk to the blurring of the distinction between admissions proper and inpatients showing up as positive cases if they happen to be tested during their stay .
What I am going to do in this simple slide is nail the point home by calculating the ratio of inpatient COVID-19 cases to COVID-19 admissions proper for the period March – September .
A ratio of 1.0 means admissions proper equal ‘ admissions ’ brought about by testing inpatients @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inpatient diagnoses than admitted cases , and a ratio less than 1.0 indicates less inpatient diagnoses than admitted cases .
The grey dashed line represents this critical threshold .
We now see that , in the early stages of the outbreak in late March , the number of inpatients being classified as COVID-19 cases outnumbered actual admissions for the disease by almost eight-to-one .
This is why I have stated COVID-19 is primarily an institutional disease .
The ratio falls steadily to its lowest point during late June and early July when it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1.0 .
Thus at no point did admissions proper outnumber inpatients who were discovered to be carrying SARS-COV-2 .
This result is quite something because the public have been convinced that COVID-19 has been characterised by cartloads of victims being rushed into hospital .
Nothing could be further from the truth .
It is important to realise that I ’ m not saying this as a mere mortal – it is the NHS England official hospital activity data saying this – all I am doing is delivering the hidden message therein !
I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will have spotted the rise in the ratio from late July onward , so inpatient COVID-19 appears to be on the rise again to give us our so-called ‘ second wave ’ .
I say ‘ appears ’ because these people were in hospital for other reasons than COVID-19 and just so happened to test positive .
This may or may not translate in symptomatic cases and may or may not translate into infectious cases since the RT-PCR test will detect remnants of an earlier infection for several weeks .
In the first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Rate ( PSR ) , being cases identified per 100 tests undertaken , is a spiky affair that does indeed show that detection rates are increasing across the UK .
It is worth noting that what the government are calling a ‘ case ’ is merely a detection ; a case only becomes a case if there is something medically amiss and that person comes under the care of a physician .
A person watching TV at home and eating Pot Noodles for 14 days after testing positive isn ’ t a ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ detected .
A positive test does not guarantee they will be symptomatic or , indeed , carrying any ‘ live ’ virus whatsoever – the PCR test continues to detect the remains of an infection for several weeks .
A positive test may also be triggered by other viruses from the same genetic family , and may also be a false positive .
Hence my preference for use of the word ‘ detection ’ and not ‘ case ’ , though I appreciate this will not sell government policies that well .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is happening but we can not be sure exactly what !
It could be the beginning of a genuine second wave , it could be detection of a different viral outbreak , it could be the result of pushing test amplification cycles beyond sensible limits and it could be the result of sampling former hotspots .
The second slide helps us to qualify what the first slide may mean .
Here we have a plot of the Bed Occupancy Rate ( BOR ) , being NHS beds occupied per case detected .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accumulated cases .
If that surge in the Positive Swab Rate ( PSR ) is the beginning of a second wave then we should see the Bed Occupancy Rate ( BOR ) rise .
Except we don ’ t .
Some people argue there will be a time delay and this is absolutely true .
The problem with such an argument is that this time delay will be of the order of 1 – 2 weeks from symptom to hospitalisation , yet the PSR started rising notably back on 30th August .
I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dashed line – ironically the BOR took a dive at this point !
This bendy blue line provides definitive evidence that the rise in the detection rate is not translating in bed occupancy , which has been decreasing steadily since mid-July .
This would suggest we are not looking a genuine second wave but an artefact of testing .
( Emphasis added ) The third slide also helps is to qualify what the first slide may mean .
Here we have a plot of the case fatality rate ( CFR ) , being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is simply accumulated deaths divided by accumulated cases .
Again we see nose-diving curves .
The 30th August PSR upturn watershed moment is marked by another red dashed line , with the 28-day deadline for deaths from these first few unfortunate new cases looming large .
I haven ’ t seen any headlines claiming a massive surge in deaths in the last three days so we ’ ll have to assume none of these ‘ second wave ’ detected folk died and that those red and blue curves will continue with their downward @ @ @ @ @ @ @ kicks-in .
The conclusion I draw from all this is that the PCR test ( 4th slide ) , along with WHO protocols for death certification and case reporting are somewhat cock-eyed .
I have yet to see convincing clinical evidence of a second wave .
( Emphasis added ) Somebody has got their knickers in a right twist on the websites with data now going missing and datafiles being incorrectly named .
Herewith details of errors spotted so far… • The ‘ Testing and capacity , by pillar ’ panel button for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ provides testing and capacity data for pillars 1 – 4 .
• The button marked ‘ pillar 3 ’ offers the same datafile as for the button marked ‘ pillars 1 2 ’ but with a bit missing .
• The button marked ‘ pillar 4 ’ offers the same datafile as for the radio button marked ‘ pillars 1 2 ’ but with a bit missing .
• They have removed the panels for pillar 1 testing by nation and pillar 2 testing by nation which has made it impossible to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is somewhat frustrating since England pillar 1 testing yields the longest running data series we have .
• The data for patients admitted to hospital now starts promptly on 23rd March – they have gone and erased the very early data from 1st – 22nd March .
With daily new case rates now EXCEEDING levels seen back in April , it would take a particularly dense citizen to realise the government ’ s claims , along with their data , are simply not adding up .
”

Written by Andy Rowlands
Here is an update to my previous article, with additional quotes from our anonymous retired government scientist:
“I have alerted folk to the blurring of the distinction between admissions proper and inpatients showing up as positive cases if they happen to be tested during their stay. What I am going to do in this simple slide is nail the point home by calculating the ratio of inpatient COVID-19 cases to COVID-19 admissions proper for the period March – September.
A ratio of 1.0 means admissions proper equal ‘admissions’ brought about by testing inpatients. Ratios greater than 1.0 indicate more inpatient diagnoses than admitted cases, and a ratio less than 1.0 indicates less inpatient diagnoses than admitted cases. The grey dashed line represents this critical threshold.
We now see that, in the early stages of the outbreak in late March, the number of inpatients being classified as COVID-19 cases outnumbered actual admissions for the disease by almost eight-to-one. This is why I have stated COVID-19 is primarily an institutional disease. The ratio falls steadily to its lowest point during late June and early July when it hovers just above that magic threshold of 1.0. Thus at no point did admissions proper outnumber inpatients who were discovered to be carrying SARS-COV-2.
This result is quite something because the public have been convinced that COVID-19 has been characterised by cartloads of victims being rushed into hospital. Nothing could be further from the truth. It is important to realise that I’m not saying this as a mere mortal – it is the NHS England official hospital activity data saying this – all I am doing is delivering the hidden message therein!
I’m pretty sure some of you will have spotted the rise in the ratio from late July onward, so inpatient COVID-19 appears to be on the rise again to give us our so-called ‘second wave’. I say ‘appears’ because these people were in hospital for other reasons than COVID-19 and just so happened to test positive. This may or may not translate in symptomatic cases and may or may not translate into infectious cases since the RT-PCR test will detect remnants of an earlier infection for several weeks.
An interesting story
In the first graph we see that the Positive Swab Rate (PSR), being cases identified per 100 tests undertaken, is a spiky affair that does indeed show that detection rates are increasing across the UK. It is worth noting that what the government are calling a ‘case’ is merely a detection; a case only becomes a case if there is something medically amiss and that person comes under the care of a physician. A person watching TV at home and eating Pot Noodles for 14 days after testing positive isn’t a ‘case’ despite the virus allegedly being detected. A positive test does not guarantee they will be symptomatic or, indeed, carrying any ‘live’ virus whatsoever – the PCR test continues to detect the remains of an infection for several weeks. A positive test may also be triggered by other viruses from the same genetic family, and may also be a false positive. Hence my preference for use of the word ‘detection’ and not ‘case’, though I appreciate this will not sell government policies that well. This slide, therefore, tells us something is happening but we cannot be sure exactly what! It could be the beginning of a genuine second wave, it could be detection of a different viral outbreak, it could be the result of pushing test amplification cycles beyond sensible limits and it could be the result of sampling former hotspots.
The second slide helps us to qualify what the first slide may mean. Here we have a plot of the Bed Occupancy Rate (BOR), being NHS beds occupied per case detected. This is simply accumulated bed days divided by accumulated cases. If that surge in the Positive Swab Rate (PSR) is the beginning of a second wave then we should see the Bed Occupancy Rate (BOR) rise. Except we don’t. Some people argue there will be a time delay and this is absolutely true. The problem with such an argument is that this time delay will be of the order of 1 – 2 weeks from symptom to hospitalisation, yet the PSR started rising notably back on 30th August. I have marked this date with a red dashed line – ironically the BOR took a dive at this point! This bendy blue line provides definitive evidence that the rise in the detection rate is not translating in bed occupancy, which has been decreasing steadily since mid-July. This would suggest we are not looking a genuine second wave but an artefact of testing. (Emphasis added)
The third slide also helps is to qualify what the first slide may mean. Here we have a plot of the case fatality rate (CFR), being deaths per 100 cases detected. This is simply accumulated deaths divided by accumulated cases. Again we see nose-diving curves. The 30th August PSR upturn watershed moment is marked by another red dashed line, with the 28-day deadline for deaths from these first few unfortunate new cases looming large. I haven’t seen any headlines claiming a massive surge in deaths in the last three days so we’ll have to assume none of these ‘second wave’ detected folk died and that those red and blue curves will continue with their downward journey until the seasonal winter death toll kicks-in.
The conclusion I draw from all this is that the PCR test (4th slide), along with WHO protocols for death certification and case reporting are somewhat cock-eyed. I have yet to see convincing clinical evidence of a second wave. (Emphasis added)
A new twist
Somebody has got their knickers in a right twist on the websites with data now going missing and datafiles being incorrectly named. Herewith details of errors spotted so far…
The ‘Testing and capacity, by pillar’ panel button for the data marked ‘pillars 1 2’ provides testing and capacity data for pillars 1 – 4. The button marked ‘pillar 3’ offers the same datafile as for the button marked ‘pillars 1 2’ but with a bit missing. The button marked ‘pillar 4’ offers the same datafile as for the radio button marked ‘pillars 1 2’ but with a bit missing. They have removed the panels for pillar 1 testing by nation and pillar 2 testing by nation which has made it impossible to analyse test data for England. This is somewhat frustrating since England pillar 1 testing yields the longest running data series we have. The data for patients admitted to hospital now starts promptly on 23rd March – they have gone and erased the very early data from 1st – 22nd March. Historic data changes slightly each time I update files!
With daily new case rates now EXCEEDING levels seen back in April, it would take a particularly dense citizen to realise the government’s claims, along with their data, are simply not adding up.”


principiascientificinternational--2020-10-12--A Dark Truth Behind the Green New Deal & COVID-19

A Dark Truth Behind the Green New Deal & COVID-19 In recent months an effort to unleash a green transformation of the global order has taken the form of the “ Green New Deal ” promoted by many of the same financial interests from London and Wall Street which did much to bring civilization to the brink of a new financial blowout which will make 1929 look like a cake walk .
Meanwhile , threats of a military coup in America offer a replay of the 1933-1934 Wall Street Putsch which nearly overthrew FDR before the first New Deal could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ campaign endorsed by pope Francis and led by Greta Thunberg has spread across Europe and America while COVID-19 has been cooked up as a cover to attempt to force through this systemic change outside of the influence of pesky “ democratic institutions ” like nation states .
In fact , many of the figures who have become high priests of COVID-19 global response coordination such as Bill Gates , and the WHO ’ s Tedros Adhanom have both said they see this pandemic as an opportunity to finally decarbonize the world system .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ genuine ?
Do these oligarchs , billionaires and technocrats presiding over the proposed COVID-19/COP-21 reforms really care so much that their support for a Green New Deal is as benevolent as the media portrays… or is something darker at play ?
To answer these questions , we will have to first quickly review what the Green New Deal IS , then where it came from and then finally what its architects have stated they wish to accomplish with its implementation .
What is it ?
As the name implies , the Green New @ @ @ @ @ @ @ takes its name from the original New Deal of 1932 enacted under the leadership of President Franklin Roosevelt .
The New Deal was originally a program for bank reform , and mass infrastructure building in order to heal America from the deep wounds caused by 4 years of Great Depression .
While the Green New Deal of 2019 proposes to dramatically overhaul the rules of finance and infrastructure planning , its similarities to the original end there .
Roosevelt ’ s New Deal was driven by projects which increased the productive powers of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by investments into hydroelectric projects , transportation corridors , the Tennessee Valley Authority , and thousands of other infrastructure projects .
The Green New Deal on the other hand seeks to lower American productive powers of labor and living standards by investments into zero growth green infrastructure .
Of course if that were explicitly stated , no one would drink the Kool-Aid .
As presidents Putin and Trump have both emphasized at various times not only has it never been proven that human-made CO2 drives climate variations , but it has also come @ @ @ @ @ @ @ warming trend dominant since 1977 has been on an strange “ pause ” .
While CO2 output steadly rose from 1938-1977 , it was accompanied by a total cooling causing scientists in 1977 to sound the alarm that we were on the verge of an ice age .
This fact reflects the embarrassing reality that CO2 tends to follow climate variations rather than precede them , indicating that this greenhouse gas is actually being effected by the warming of the earth most likely driven by space-based causes as Putin has referred repeatedly .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ published NASA studies have shown that the world ’ s biomass has increased by 10 % in recent years due in large measure to the industrial growth policies of China and India .
Plants have , after all , been observed to grow much better when fed by increased levels of carbon dioxide .
Where did it come from ?
So how could so many respectable scientists , journals and politicians have possibly assumed a fallacy to be so true that an overhaul of the entire global society is being proposed ?
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but the current pressure to transform our entire world to the undisputed “ reality ” of man-made global warming finds its true origins in the Malthusian revival of 1968-1972 .
In this short interval of time , a vacuum left by the overthrow of pro-development leaders such as John F. Kennedy , Enrico Mattei , Charles de Gaulle , Martin Luther King and Bobby Kennedy was filled by establishment hacks and cowards .
These tools ushered in a paradigm shift towards “ conservationism ” and rejected the industrial growth ethic that defined @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This Malthusian Revival answered the challenge put forth by Eugenics Society president and UNESCO founder Julian Huxley who wrote in 1946 : “ Political unification in some sort of world government will be required… Even though… any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible , it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care , and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ after the world had come to realize the horrors of Nazi eugenics , Huxley and his associates among the Anglo-American elite who financed Hitler had a big job to clean up the image of eugenics and re-package it under another name .
The Club of Rome and 1001 Nature Trust In 1968 , an organization was formed known as the Club of Rome led by two misanthropes named Aurelio Peccei and Sir Alexander King .
The organization quickly set up branches across the Anglo-Saxon world with members ranging from select ideologues from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who all agreed that society ’ s best form of governance was a scientific dictatorship .
In order to finance this paradigm shift , the 1001 Trust was founded in 1970 by Prince Bernhardt of the Netherlands .
Bernhardt ( card carrying Nazi and founder of the Bilderberger Group in 1954 ) had worked alongside his close misanthropic associates Prince Philip Mountbatten , and Sir Julian Huxley to create the World Wildlife Fund ( WWF ) just a few years earlier .
The plan was simple : each of the 1001 founding members @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which was then directed towards the green paradigm shift .
Other prominent 1001 Club members included international royalty , billionaires , and technocratic sociopaths who wanted nothing more than to manage this promised Brave New World as “ alphas ” .
Many of these figures were also members of the Club of Rome , including Canada ’ s Maurice Strong , who later became Vice President of the WWF under Prince Philip ’ s presidency .
Strong had replaced another WWF Vice President by the name of Louis Mortimer Bloomfield .
Bloomfield was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ District Attorney Jim Garrison discovered to be at the heart of the Montreal-based assassination of the anti-Malthusian President John F. Kennedy in 1963 .
The document which became the bible and blueprint of this new anti-humanist movement that birthed today ’ s Green New Deal agenda was titled Limits to Growth ( 1972 ) and today holds the record as the most widely read book on ecology , having sold 30 million copies published into 32 languages .
A recent article celebrating the book ’ s 40 year anniversary stated… The book itself @ @ @ @ @ @ @ study undertaken by a team of MIT statisticians under the nominal heading of Jay Forrester and Dennis Meadows .
Like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez today , these young MIT professors were merely cardboard cut-outs selected to deflect from the higher social engineers managing the show from the top .
The MIT study itself was not even begun in the USA , but rather in Montebellow Quebec in 1971 , when Club of Rome-backer Pierre Trudeau allocated tax payer money to begin the project .
A network of Rhodes Scholars and Privy Councillors centered around Alexander @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( founder of Environment Canada ) , Michael Pitfield ( Privy Council Clerk and founder of Canada ’ s CSIS ) and Governor General Roland Michener , among others , had presided over that meeting .
When the Canadian funds had served their role , the project continued to receive its funding from the Volkswagen Foundation , whose Nazi-supporting past should have made some of the MIT statisticians uncomfortable .
These Club of Rome/WWF/1001 Club members dubbed themselves “ neo Malthusians ” referring to the ideology popularized by the British Empire ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the Principle of Population pessimistically noticed that human population grows geometrically while food production grows arithmetically leading invariably to a crisis point of over-population .
This crisis point creates a mathematical foundation for the concept that later came to be dubbed “ carrying capacity ” by the authors of Limits to Growth .
Of course rather than permit those human cattle from developing their minds in order to make more discoveries and inventions which would offset this crisis point , Malthus ( and his heirs later ) knew that the British Empire @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that creative power unleashed .
Instead , Malthus coldly advocated the elimination of the “ unfit to make way for the more fit.
” Not adept at the subtleties of modern 21st century newspeak , Malthus went so far as to propose that even children perish : “ All children who are born beyond what would be required to keep up the population to a desired level must necessarily perish , unless room be made for them by the deaths of grown persons… therefore we should facilitate , instead of foolishly and vainly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nature in producing this mortality ” By re-packaging Malthus ’ assumptions into a more complex computing system , these neo-Malthusians wanted to create a shame based movement of willful self-annihilation among an entire generation of baby boomers .
Of course if you assume that technological progress has ended , then it will certainly appear that a closed system of fixed limited resources can only be managed by a technocratic elite choosing who gets diminishing returns as the world settles into some imaginary “ mathematical equilibrium ” of sustainability .
Fortunately for humanity , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of racists and imperialists .
A long time London trained asset and close collaborator of Canada ’ s Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau , Maurice Lamontagne was Club of Rome member , and former President of the Privy Council .
Of all Club of Rome members , Lamontagne was the most candid in identifying the Earth ’ s greatest enemy to be human creativity itself .
Writing in his Senate Committee Reports of 1968-1972 which reformed science policy funding and planning , Lamontagne wrote : “ Nature imposes definite constraints on technology itself @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the net effect of his action in the long run can be to reduce rather than to increase nature ’ s potential as a provider of resources and habitable space… But then , an obvious question arises : How can we stop man ’ s creativeness ?
” Correctly recognizing that the yearning to discover the unknown is built into the human condition , Lamontagne answers his own question , writing : “ How can we proclaim a moratorium on technology ?
It is impossible to destroy existing knowledge ; impossible to paralyze @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , to invent and to innovate… In the final analysis we find that technology is merely a tool created by man in pursuit of his infinite aspirations and is not the significant element invading the natural environment .
It is material growth itself that is the source of conflict between man and nature ” Thus creativity and its fruits of technological progress are acceptable only IF they reduce the assumed conflict between man and nature posited by Lamontagne !
“ Bad ” technology in Lamontagne ’ s formulation , has the effect of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ie : powers of productivity ) .
If , on the other hand , we promote technologies of a low energy flux density form , such as windmills , solar panels and biofuels , which lead to the reduction of man ’ s powers to exist , then technology can be defined as a “ good ” thing ” according to this twisted logic .
This concept was echoed by another Club of Rome member and collaborator with Lamontagne on his Senate Report named Omond Solandt .
Solandt made his career as the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Philip ’ s pedophiliac mentor ) during WWII and headed the Defense Research Board until 1957 , where he collaborated on MK Ultra alongside the infamous Ewan Cameron at McGill University .
Solandt sophistically said : What defines “ the welfare of mankind ” in the mind of an MK Ultra proponent should give one chills .
In preparation for the “ post-industrial order ” that was unleashed with the 1971 floating of the US dollar and the destruction of the Bretton Woods monetary system , that at least included a modicum of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prescribed that the “ new wisdom ” no longer aim at discoveries in atomic , medical and space sciences , in order to focus on more “ practical ” engineering endeavors .
He also proposed that funding to advanced science be diminished by widening the definition of “ science ” itself to embrace the humanities , monetary economics and social sciences .
Those programs then began absorbing the funding that had formerly been directed to research on pure science .
Lamontagne stated this in volume one of his Report : One leading Canadian @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Club of Rome-driven transformation .
Ronald Hayes , professor of environmental science at Dalhousie University and Canadian Civil Servant wrote his 1973 book “ The Chaining of Prometheus : The Evolution of a Power Structure for Canadian Science ” , where he identified Lamontagne as a minion of the god Zeus as portrayed in Aeschylus ’ famous drama Prometheus Bound .
The ancient Greek drama told the story of the demi-god Prometheus who was punished for 10 thousand years for the defiant act of teaching humanity how to use the Fire which Zeus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ call to deconstruct the entire 1938-1971 science funding structure and rebuild it under a new technocratic regime , Professor Hayes said that the main problem with the Lamontagne approach was called the Egyptian Syndrome : Hayes attacked the newly-formed powers of the Treasury Board which were now given exceptional control of science policy under a new scientific dictatorship when he said “ the most subtle exercise of power , which obviates the necessity of close control , There Are No Limits To Growth Ten years after the publication of the Limits to Growth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Fusion Energy Foundation Lyndon LaRouche ( 1922-2019 ) responded to the neo-Malthusian movement in more forceful terms than Dr. Hayes .
Writing his 1982 “ There are no Limits to Growth ” as an early publication of the Club of Life , LaRouche wrote : Describing the extraordinary influence which the Limits to Growth had on consolidating the neo-Malthusian revival as a dominant factor in western policy circles , LaRouche identified the core fallacies which are only now being properly challenged by the efforts of President Trump in America .
LaRouche stated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the neo-Malthusians had to deny the existence of technological progress ( and its origins in human creative reason ) as the means by which humanity ’ s carrying capacity is changed according to discoveries and inventions .
This fact of humanity ’ s relationship with the universe absolutely defines our existence as a species above all other creatures of the biosphere .
As the “ carrying capacities ” of other species are defined by the environment and genetic characteristics , humans uniquely can transcend those conditions willfully on the condition that we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and educational heritage of the past with the inspiration and curiosity to carry that heritage to ever higher limits without ever expecting to reach a “ mathematical equilibrium ” or “ entropic heat death ” as so many statisticians from the Limits to Growth school pessimistically presume .
In opposition to this school , LaRouche ’ s discoveries in the science of physical economy ( made during a period of 1952-1956 ) were premised on the opposing concept that mankind ’ s ability to leap from lower to higher forms of energy consumption @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coal to oil to nuclear fission to fusion etc . )
allows for the upward transformation of humanity ’ s physical economic potential without limits .
Creative leaps into the unknown drive new discoveries of principles which allow for humanity ’ s potential relative population density to increase with increased standards of living , life expectancies and cognitive potential in ways that no other animal ( which the Malthusians wish us to presume we are ) can achieve .
This fact of life is the essential proof that not only mankind but the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ constant self-perfectibility and thus ANTI-ENTROPIC in its essence .
The BRI and the REAL New Deal I hope that this report has demonstrated that the Green New Deal is nothing other than a new form of eugenics masquerading as a socially conscious reform of the system .
The fact is that not only is this Green New Deal NOT green ( as a world covered by solar panels would increase desertification of the earth through heating ) , but has no connection to the true New Deal .
The effects of a program @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to “ acceptable levels ” in accord with the will of today ’ s British Empire would bring nothing more than chaos , famine and depopulation to humanity .
Luckily , today ’ s world carries nearly 8 billion souls and ( barring a few stubborn oligarchs and technocrats ) - all of whom have minds that could be willfully perfected and deployed to make great discoveries in science and the arts .
The world in which these people live is increasingly being shaped by a REAL New Deal under the Chinese-led Belt @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than 160 countries on board and is the size of 20 Marshall Plans .
This initiative requires a return to an ethic founded upon a love of mankind and belief in scientific and technological progress .
This spirit was expressed beautifully by President Xi Jinping who said on May 15 at the Dialogue of Asian Civilizations : The fact that such figures as Presidents Xi Jinping and Putin have created an alliance based upon long term planning , great infrastructure projects to uplift the conditions of life of everyone and frontier technological progress @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” created in the wake of the assassinations of anti-Malthusian leaders in the 1960s is finally coming to an end .
America ’ s slow self-mutilation has finally a chance to heal with the first anti-Malthusian President elected since the days of the well-intentioned ( though often dim-witted ) Ronald Reagan over 35 years ago .
While Reagan did not have a Russia-China power alliance to cooperate with during the Cold War , President Trump does .
The offer for America to join the Belt and Road and new strategic operating system of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an answer .
How Trump will respond remains to be seen .
Matthew Ehret is the Editor-in-Chief of the Canadian Patriot Review , a BRI Expert on Tactical talk , and has authored 3 volumes of ‘ Untold History of Canada ’ book series .
In 2019 he co-founded the Montreal-based Rising Tide Foundation .
He can be reached at matt.ehret @ tutamail.com Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19 PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

A Dark Truth Behind the Green New Deal & COVID-19
Written by Matthew Ehret
In recent months an effort to unleash a green transformation of the global order has taken the form of the “Green New Deal” promoted by many of the same financial interests from London and Wall Street which did much to bring civilization to the brink of a new financial blowout which will make 1929 look like a cake walk.
Meanwhile, threats of a military coup in America offer a replay of the 1933-1934 Wall Street Putsch which nearly overthrew FDR before the first New Deal could be implemented.
A children’s campaign endorsed by pope Francis and led by Greta Thunberg has spread across Europe and America while COVID-19 has been cooked up as a cover to attempt to force through this systemic change outside of the influence of pesky “democratic institutions” like nation states. In fact, many of the figures who have become high priests of COVID-19 global response coordination such as Bill Gates, and the WHO’s Tedros Adhanom have both said they see this pandemic as an opportunity to finally decarbonize the world system.
Is this passion to save the planet genuine? Do these oligarchs, billionaires and technocrats presiding over the proposed COVID-19/COP-21 reforms really care so much that their support for a Green New Deal is as benevolent as the media portrays… or is something darker at play? To answer these questions, we will have to first quickly review what the Green New Deal IS, then where it came from and then finally what its architects have stated they wish to accomplish with its implementation.
What is it?
As the name implies, the Green New Deal is a sweeping policy agenda which takes its name from the original New Deal of 1932 enacted under the leadership of President Franklin Roosevelt. The New Deal was originally a program for bank reform, and mass infrastructure building in order to heal America from the deep wounds caused by 4 years of Great Depression. While the Green New Deal of 2019 proposes to dramatically overhaul the rules of finance and infrastructure planning, its similarities to the original end there.
Roosevelt’s New Deal was driven by projects which increased the productive powers of labor of the nation as a whole by investments into hydroelectric projects, transportation corridors, the Tennessee Valley Authority, and thousands of other infrastructure projects. The Green New Deal on the other hand seeks to lower American productive powers of labor and living standards by investments into zero growth green infrastructure. Of course if that were explicitly stated, no one would drink the Kool-Aid.
As presidents Putin and Trump have both emphasized at various times not only has it never been proven that human-made CO2 drives climate variations, but it has also come to light that since 1998, the warming trend dominant since 1977 has been on an strange “pause”. While CO2 output steadly rose from 1938-1977, it was accompanied by a total cooling causing scientists in 1977 to sound the alarm that we were on the verge of an ice age.
This fact reflects the embarrassing reality that CO2 tends to follow climate variations rather than precede them, indicating that this greenhouse gas is actually being effected by the warming of the earth most likely driven by space-based causes as Putin has referred repeatedly. Even more surprising to some, recently published NASA studies have shown that the world’s biomass has increased by 10% in recent years due in large measure to the industrial growth policies of China and India. Plants have, after all, been observed to grow much better when fed by increased levels of carbon dioxide.
Where did it come from?
So how could so many respectable scientists, journals and politicians have possibly assumed a fallacy to be so true that an overhaul of the entire global society is being proposed? This obviously didn’t arise over night, but the current pressure to transform our entire world to the undisputed “reality” of man-made global warming finds its true origins in the Malthusian revival of 1968-1972.
In this short interval of time, a vacuum left by the overthrow of pro-development leaders such as John F. Kennedy, Enrico Mattei, Charles de Gaulle, Martin Luther King and Bobby Kennedy was filled by establishment hacks and cowards. These tools ushered in a paradigm shift towards “conservationism” and rejected the industrial growth ethic that defined western civilization up until that point.
This Malthusian Revival answered the challenge put forth by Eugenics Society president and UNESCO founder Julian Huxley who wrote in 1946: “Political unification in some sort of world government will be required… Even though… any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.” Of course, just one year after the world had come to realize the horrors of Nazi eugenics, Huxley and his associates among the Anglo-American elite who financed Hitler had a big job to clean up the image of eugenics and re-package it under another name.
The Club of Rome and 1001 Nature Trust
In 1968, an organization was formed known as the Club of Rome led by two misanthropes named Aurelio Peccei and Sir Alexander King. The organization quickly set up branches across the Anglo-Saxon world with members ranging from select ideologues from the political, business, and scientific community who all agreed that society’s best form of governance was a scientific dictatorship.
Sir Alexander wrote:
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill….All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”
In order to finance this paradigm shift, the 1001 Trust was founded in 1970 by Prince Bernhardt of the Netherlands. Bernhardt (card carrying Nazi and founder of the Bilderberger Group in 1954) had worked alongside his close misanthropic associates Prince Philip Mountbatten, and Sir Julian Huxley to create the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) just a few years earlier.
The plan was simple: each of the 1001 founding members simply put $10,000 into the trust which was then directed towards the green paradigm shift. Other prominent 1001 Club members included international royalty, billionaires, and technocratic sociopaths who wanted nothing more than to manage this promised Brave New World as “alphas”.
Many of these figures were also members of the Club of Rome, including Canada’s Maurice Strong, who later became Vice President of the WWF under Prince Philip’s presidency. Strong had replaced another WWF Vice President by the name of Louis Mortimer Bloomfield. Bloomfield was another 1001 Club member whom New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison discovered to be at the heart of the Montreal-based assassination of the anti-Malthusian President John F. Kennedy in 1963.
The document which became the bible and blueprint of this new anti-humanist movement that birthed today’s Green New Deal agenda was titled Limits to Growth (1972) and today holds the record as the most widely read book on ecology, having sold 30 million copies published into 32 languages. A recent article celebrating the book’s 40 year anniversary stated…
“it helped launch modern environmental computer modeling and began our current globally focused environmental debate. After Limits [To Growth], environmentalists, scientists and policy-makers increasingly thought of ecological problems in planetary terms and as dynamically interconnected… It is worth revisiting Limits today because, more than any other book, it introduced the concept of anthropocentric climate change to a mass audience.”
The book itself was the culmination of a two year study undertaken by a team of MIT statisticians under the nominal heading of Jay Forrester and Dennis Meadows. Like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez today, these young MIT professors were merely cardboard cut-outs selected to deflect from the higher social engineers managing the show from the top.
The MIT study itself was not even begun in the USA, but rather in Montebellow Quebec in 1971, when Club of Rome-backer Pierre Trudeau allocated tax payer money to begin the project. A network of Rhodes Scholars and Privy Councillors centered around Alexander King, Maurice Strong, Maurice Lamontagne (founder of Environment Canada), Michael Pitfield (Privy Council Clerk and founder of Canada’s CSIS) and Governor General Roland Michener, among others, had presided over that meeting. When the Canadian funds had served their role, the project continued to receive its funding from the Volkswagen Foundation, whose Nazi-supporting past should have made some of the MIT statisticians uncomfortable.
Malthusianism in Brief
These Club of Rome/WWF/1001 Club members dubbed themselves “neo Malthusians” referring to the ideology popularized by the British Empire’s Thomas Malthus. Malthus’ 1799 Essay on the Principle of Population pessimistically noticed that human population grows geometrically while food production grows arithmetically leading invariably to a crisis point of over-population. This crisis point creates a mathematical foundation for the concept that later came to be dubbed “carrying capacity” by the authors of Limits to Growth.
Of course rather than permit those human cattle from developing their minds in order to make more discoveries and inventions which would offset this crisis point, Malthus (and his heirs later) knew that the British Empire which employed him could never exist were that creative power unleashed. Instead, Malthus coldly advocated the elimination of the “unfit to make way for the more fit.” Not adept at the subtleties of modern 21st century newspeak, Malthus went so far as to propose that even children perish:
“All children who are born beyond what would be required to keep up the population to a desired level must necessarily perish, unless room be made for them by the deaths of grown persons… therefore we should facilitate, instead of foolishly and vainly endeavoring to impede, the operations of nature in producing this mortality”
By re-packaging Malthus’ assumptions into a more complex computing system, these neo-Malthusians wanted to create a shame based movement of willful self-annihilation among an entire generation of baby boomers.
Of course if you assume that technological progress has ended, then it will certainly appear that a closed system of fixed limited resources can only be managed by a technocratic elite choosing who gets diminishing returns as the world settles into some imaginary “mathematical equilibrium” of sustainability. Fortunately for humanity, reality rarely conforms to the pessimistic ideals of racists and imperialists.
A long time London trained asset and close collaborator of Canada’s Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau, Maurice Lamontagne was Club of Rome member, and former President of the Privy Council. Of all Club of Rome members, Lamontagne was the most candid in identifying the Earth’s greatest enemy to be human creativity itself. Writing in his Senate Committee Reports of 1968-1972 which reformed science policy funding and planning, Lamontagne wrote:
“Nature imposes definite constraints on technology itself and if man persists in ignoring them the net effect of his action in the long run can be to reduce rather than to increase nature’s potential as a provider of resources and habitable space… But then, an obvious question arises: How can we stop man’s creativeness?”
Correctly recognizing that the yearning to discover the unknown is built into the human condition, Lamontagne answers his own question, writing:
“How can we proclaim a moratorium on technology? It is impossible to destroy existing knowledge; impossible to paralyze man’s inborn desire to learn, to invent and to innovate… In the final analysis we find that technology is merely a tool created by man in pursuit of his infinite aspirations and is not the significant element invading the natural environment. It is material growth itself that is the source of conflict between man and nature”
Thus creativity and its fruits of technological progress are acceptable only IF they reduce the assumed conflict between man and nature posited by Lamontagne! “Bad” technology in Lamontagne’s formulation, has the effect of increasing humanity’s material growth (ie: powers of productivity). If, on the other hand, we promote technologies of a low energy flux density form, such as windmills, solar panels and biofuels, which lead to the reduction of man’s powers to exist, then technology can be defined as a “good” thing” according to this twisted logic.
This concept was echoed by another Club of Rome member and collaborator with Lamontagne on his Senate Report named Omond Solandt. Solandt made his career as the science advisor to Lord Mountbatten (Prince Philip’s pedophiliac mentor) during WWII and headed the Defense Research Board until 1957, where he collaborated on MK Ultra alongside the infamous Ewan Cameron at McGill University. Solandt sophistically said:
“There is no longer any need to advance science. The need is rather to understand, guide and use science effectively for the welfare of mankind.”
What defines “the welfare of mankind” in the mind of an MK Ultra proponent should give one chills.
In preparation for the “post-industrial order” that was unleashed with the 1971 floating of the US dollar and the destruction of the Bretton Woods monetary system, that at least included a modicum of regulation of the monetarist speculators, Lamontagne prescribed that the “new wisdom” no longer aim at discoveries in atomic, medical and space sciences, in order to focus on more “practical” engineering endeavors. He also proposed that funding to advanced science be diminished by widening the definition of “science” itself to embrace the humanities, monetary economics and social sciences. Those programs then began absorbing the funding that had formerly been directed to research on pure science. Lamontagne stated this in volume one of his Report:
“The new wisdom prescribes that the additional R&D effort be devoted to the life sciences and social sciences rather than the physical sciences… to economic and social objectives rather than curiosity and discovery.”
In Defense of Prometheus
One leading Canadian scientist took an early stand against this Club of Rome-driven transformation. Ronald Hayes, professor of environmental science at Dalhousie University and Canadian Civil Servant wrote his 1973 book “The Chaining of Prometheus: The Evolution of a Power Structure for Canadian Science”, where he identified Lamontagne as a minion of the god Zeus as portrayed in Aeschylus’ famous drama Prometheus Bound. The ancient Greek drama told the story of the demi-god Prometheus who was punished for 10 thousand years for the defiant act of teaching humanity how to use the Fire which Zeus had monopolized for himself.
Attacking the call to deconstruct the entire 1938-1971 science funding structure and rebuild it under a new technocratic regime, Professor Hayes said that the main problem with the Lamontagne approach was called the Egyptian Syndrome:
“if only we could destroy all that the Israelis have built up and reduce Palestine to a desert everyone would be equal and we could start to build a better world for the Arabs. Thus Lamontagne wants to destroy the National Research Council, the body that has nurtured and launched much of the government research and got the graduate programs going in our universities. It is a fault of the Trudeau administration which Lamontagne echoes.”
Hayes attacked the newly-formed powers of the Treasury Board which were now given exceptional control of science policy under a new scientific dictatorship when he said “the most subtle exercise of power, which obviates the necessity of close control,
“is infiltration by reliable people- the creation of a ruling elite…These Englishmen became known the world over as the rulers of the British Empire… With somewhat similar aims, the Public Service Commission is grooming future Canadian government managers to follow the general policies and precepts of the Treasury Board.”
There Are No Limits To Growth
Ten years after the publication of the Limits to Growth, American presidential candidate and founder of the Fusion Energy Foundation Lyndon LaRouche (1922-2019) responded to the neo-Malthusian movement in more forceful terms than Dr. Hayes. Writing his 1982 “There are no Limits to Growth” as an early publication of the Club of Life, LaRouche wrote:
“It is not the growth of industry which destroys the world’s forests. In most cases, the cause is a lack of industrial output, a lack of good industrial management of the ecosphere. Over the past fifteen years, the greatest single cause for destruction of the world’s “ecology” has been the toleration of the policies demanded by the so called “ecologists,” the so-called “neo-Malthusians” of the Club of Rome, of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), of the World Wildlife Fund, the Aspen Institute, the Ford Foundation, the ‘Rockefeller Foundation, the U.S. Sierra Club, and so forth and so on. We are not putting enough industrially-produced energy, in the form of water management, chemicals, and so forth, into the farming of the Earth’s biosphere. At the same time, we are using biomass for fuel and other “traditional” uses, in cases we should be using nuclear-generated energy supplies, and using modern, industrially produced materials in place of timber for housing and so forth”
Describing the extraordinary influence which the Limits to Growth had on consolidating the neo-Malthusian revival as a dominant factor in western policy circles, LaRouche identified the core fallacies which are only now being properly challenged by the efforts of President Trump in America. LaRouche stated:
“The study itself [Limits to Growth] was most conspicuously fraudulent on two leading counts. First, in attempting to prove that industrial society was using up its remaining natural resources very rapidly, Meadows and Forrester greatly understated the known quantities of such resources. Second, more important, Meadows and Forrester projected the rate of consumption of natural resources by using systems of simultaneous linear equations. The very use of such linear equations for a computer “model” of that sort, builds into the computer projections the assumption that absolutely no technological progress is occurring in society. In fact, technological progress, including fundamental redefinitions of what “natural resources” means, has been the outstanding feature of European civilization for five hundred years. The Limits to Growth depended upon the assumption that such technological progress had come to a sudden, absolute stop.”
Entropic or Anti-Entropic
Just like Thomas Malthus centuries earlier, the neo-Malthusians had to deny the existence of technological progress (and its origins in human creative reason) as the means by which humanity’s carrying capacity is changed according to discoveries and inventions. This fact of humanity’s relationship with the universe absolutely defines our existence as a species above all other creatures of the biosphere.
As the “carrying capacities” of other species are defined by the environment and genetic characteristics, humans uniquely can transcend those conditions willfully on the condition that we are given access to the best cultural and educational heritage of the past with the inspiration and curiosity to carry that heritage to ever higher limits without ever expecting to reach a “mathematical equilibrium” or “entropic heat death” as so many statisticians from the Limits to Growth school pessimistically presume.
In opposition to this school, LaRouche’s discoveries in the science of physical economy (made during a period of 1952-1956) were premised on the opposing concept that mankind’s ability to leap from lower to higher forms of energy consumption (ie: wood burning, to coal to oil to nuclear fission to fusion etc.) allows for the upward transformation of humanity’s physical economic potential without limits.
Creative leaps into the unknown drive new discoveries of principles which allow for humanity’s potential relative population density to increase with increased standards of living, life expectancies and cognitive potential in ways that no other animal (which the Malthusians wish us to presume we are) can achieve. This fact of life is the essential proof that not only mankind but the universe is unbounded in its potential for constant self-perfectibility and thus ANTI-ENTROPIC in its essence.
The BRI and the REAL New Deal
I hope that this report has demonstrated that the Green New Deal is nothing other than a new form of eugenics masquerading as a socially conscious reform of the system. The fact is that not only is this Green New Deal NOT green (as a world covered by solar panels would increase desertification of the earth through heating), but has no connection to the true New Deal. The effects of a program that seeks to reduce global CO2 emissions to “acceptable levels” in accord with the will of today’s British Empire would bring nothing more than chaos, famine and depopulation to humanity.
Luckily, today’s world carries nearly 8 billion souls and (barring a few stubborn oligarchs and technocrats)- all of whom have minds that could be willfully perfected and deployed to make great discoveries in science and the arts. The world in which these people live is increasingly being shaped by a REAL New Deal under the Chinese-led Belt and Road Initiative which now has more than 160 countries on board and is the size of 20 Marshall Plans. This initiative requires a return to an ethic founded upon a love of mankind and belief in scientific and technological progress. This spirit was expressed beautifully by President Xi Jinping who said on May 15 at the Dialogue of Asian Civilizations:
“For a civilization to endure, efforts must be made to keep it alive and build on its heritage from one generation to the next. More importantly, a civilization needs to adapt itself to the changing times and break new ground. The history of world civilizations tells us that every civilization needs to advance with the times and take in the best of its age in order to develop itself. We need to come up with new ideas to add impetus and inspiration to the development of our civilizations. With these efforts, we will deliver achievements for our civilizations to transcend time and space and have a lasting appeal. To spur people’s innovation and creativity, the best way is to come into contact with different civilizations, see the strengths of others and draw upon them.”
The fact that such figures as Presidents Xi Jinping and Putin have created an alliance based upon long term planning, great infrastructure projects to uplift the conditions of life of everyone and frontier technological progress indicates that the “great green game” created in the wake of the assassinations of anti-Malthusian leaders in the 1960s is finally coming to an end. America’s slow self-mutilation has finally a chance to heal with the first anti-Malthusian President elected since the days of the well-intentioned (though often dim-witted) Ronald Reagan over 35 years ago.
While Reagan did not have a Russia-China power alliance to cooperate with during the Cold War, President Trump does. The offer for America to join the Belt and Road and new strategic operating system of cooperation is on the table and awaiting an answer. How Trump will respond remains to be seen.
Matthew Ehret is the Editor-in-Chief of the Canadian Patriot Review , a BRI Expert on Tactical talk, and has authored 3 volumes of ‘Untold History of Canada’ book series. In 2019 he co-founded the Montreal-based Rising Tide Foundation. He can be reached at [email protected]
Please Donate Below To Support Our Ongoing Work To Expose The Lies About COVID19
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related