principiascientificinternational--2020-05-04--Dr Judy Mikovits Exposes Dark Secret Behind COVID19 & Vaccines

Cellular and molecular biology expert Judy Mikovits , Ph.D. believes COVID-19 — the disease — is not caused by SARS-CoV-2 alone , but rather that it is the result of a combination of SARS-CoV-2 and XMRVs ( cancer-causing human gammaretroviruses ) .
As a former insider of Big Pharma , she reveals that chemical cocktails of pathogens may be intentionally developed as bio weapons to cull unwanted sections of the populations ( e.g .
the elderly , the sick and ‘ unproductive ’ ) .
Dr. Mikovits is a renowned expert in molecular biology and biochemistry with over 30 years @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on HIV , cancer , epigenetics and neuroimmune disease with a focus on the development of novel drug and diagnostic technologies .
Jailed for Blowing the Whistle on the Big Pharma Vaccine Scam In 2011 Dr. Mikovits made a horrifying discovery that there are contaminants in all vaccines .
When she presented her data to government officials she was threatened and told to destroy all her data .
When she refused , she was jailed and her career destroyed .
The COVID-19 pandemic is the horrific outcome she feared may have been planned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whistle on how vaccines are manipulated to impose population control by intentionally infecting humans with cumulative and debilitating pathogens that eventually overwhelm the immune system causing death .
The video interview below is her detailed explanation of a chronic misuse of science .
About the author : John O ’ Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder ( with Dr Tim Ball ) of Principia Scientific International ( PSI ) .
John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert , Michael ‘ hockey @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trial of the century ‘ .
O ’ Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘ Slayers ’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world ’ s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Dr Judy Mikovits Exposes Dark Secret Behind COVID19 & Vaccines
Written by John O'Sullivan
Cellular and molecular biology expert Judy Mikovits, Ph.D. believes COVID-19 — the disease — is not caused by SARS-CoV-2 alone, but rather that it is the result of a combination of SARS-CoV-2 and XMRVs (cancer-causing human gammaretroviruses).
As a former insider of Big Pharma, she reveals that chemical cocktails of pathogens may be intentionally developed as bio weapons to cull unwanted sections of the populations (e.g. the elderly, the sick and ‘unproductive’).
Dr. Mikovits is a renowned expert in molecular biology and biochemistry with over 30 years of experience. She has directed programs on HIV, cancer, epigenetics and neuroimmune disease with a focus on the development of novel drug and diagnostic technologies.
Jailed for Blowing the Whistle on the Big Pharma Vaccine Scam
In 2011 Dr. Mikovits made a horrifying discovery that there are contaminants in all vaccines. When she presented her data to government officials she was threatened and told to destroy all her data. When she refused, she was jailed and her career destroyed.
The COVID-19 pandemic is the horrific outcome she feared may have been planned all along. Mikovits has blown the whistle on how vaccines are manipulated to impose population control by intentionally infecting humans with cumulative and debilitating pathogens that eventually overwhelm the immune system causing death.
The video interview below is her detailed explanation of a chronic misuse of science.
Learn More at www.theKarlfeldtCenter.com
Watch also here:
About the author: John O’Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI). John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-05--UK’s ‘Lockdown Professor’ Resigns After Breaking Own Rules to Get Sex

UK ’ s ‘ Lockdown Professor ’ Resigns After Breaking Own Rules to Get Sex The UK scientist whose doomsday predictions triggered a massive lockdown on both sides of the Atlantic has resigned his government advisory position , amid claims he broke the strict lockdown rules he pushed to meet his married lover .
Professor Neil Ferguson , an epidemiologist of Imperial College , London resigned from his role as a senior scientific advisor to the British government Tuesday evening .
He became known as professor lockdown after his alarming data modelling predicted huge casualties for the populations of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they enacted severe curbs on individual freedoms to lock the nations down .
While the moves were criticised by senior legal figures as approaching a police state , Professor Ferguson ’ s advice was nevertheless heeded by the government in March .
While Professor Ferguson frequently appeared in the media to defend his work and to tell the public not to break the lockdown rules , he was himself spectacularly breaking them in secret , according to a report in Britain ’ s Daily Telegraph , which claims the hard-line scientist was meeting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Antonia Staats , a married mother , who was quarantined with her family at a separate address to the professor .
Breaching the terms of the lockdown — as enforced by police — she travelled to Ferguson ’ s own home on at least two occasions , the paper claims .
Staats , who is identified as a “ left-wing activist ” , was said to be in an “ open marriage ” , The Telegraph claimed .
Posts on Staat ’ s public Facebook page show strong left-wing themes , including paid @ @ @ @ @ @ @ group , encouraging tactical voting in the last general election to oppose the Conservative party , and hard green activism .
“ I accept I made an error of judgment and took the wrong course of action .
I have therefore stepped back from my involvement in Sage [ the government ’ s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies ] .
“ I acted in the belief that I was immune , having tested positive for coronavirus , and completely isolated myself for almost two weeks after developing symptoms .
“ I deeply regret @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the continued need for social distancing to control this devastating epidemic .
The Government guidance is unequivocal , and is there to protect all of us.
” The professor is not the first government scientific figure forced to resign after taking a do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do posture to the general public .
Breitbart London reported in April when the chief scientific advisor for Scotland resigned her position after ordering citizens to obey the lockdown measures while breaking them herself in public .
While Britons have been ordered to stay in their normal residences and not travel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enjoying a more comfortable and less cramped lockdown period , Dr Catherine Calderwood was photographed travelling to her country home .
She received a police warning after being exposed in a national newspaper and resigned shortly afterwards .
Monica Lennon , health spokesman for Scottish Labour , remarked that Calderwood ’ s actions were “ extremely disappointing and hypocritical ” , and asked : “ If the Chief Medical Officer can ’ t lead by example what chance do we have of convincing people to stay at home ?
” In New Zealand @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was demoted after ignoring his own advice .
Dr David Clark was photographed going for a country bike ride , and subsequently drove his family to the beach to go surfing .
Reflecting on his breaking the advice of his own department , Dr Clark noted : “ I ’ ve been an idiot ” .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission @ @ @ @ @ @

UK’s ‘Lockdown Professor’ Resigns After Breaking Own Rules to Get Sex
Written by Oliver JJ Lane
The UK scientist whose doomsday predictions triggered a massive lockdown on both sides of the Atlantic has resigned his government advisory position, amid claims he broke the strict lockdown rules he pushed to meet his married lover.
Professor Neil Ferguson, an epidemiologist of Imperial College, London resigned from his role as a senior scientific advisor to the British government Tuesday evening.
He became known as professor lockdown after his alarming data modelling predicted huge casualties for the populations of the United Kingdom and the United States unless they enacted severe curbs on individual freedoms to lock the nations down. While the moves were criticised by senior legal figures as approaching a police state, Professor Ferguson’s advice was nevertheless heeded by the government in March.
While Professor Ferguson frequently appeared in the media to defend his work and to tell the public not to break the lockdown rules, he was himself spectacularly breaking them in secret, according to a report in Britain’s Daily Telegraph, which claims the hard-line scientist was meeting his married lover.
The paper names Antonia Staats, a married mother, who was quarantined with her family at a separate address to the professor. Breaching the terms of the lockdown — as enforced by police — she travelled to Ferguson’s own home on at least two occasions, the paper claims.
Staats, who is identified as a “left-wing activist”, was said to be in an “open marriage”, The Telegraph claimed. Posts on Staat’s public Facebook page show strong left-wing themes, including paid activism as an employee of a campaign group, encouraging tactical voting in the last general election to oppose the Conservative party, and hard green activism.
Admitting his error, Professor Ferguson told the paper:
“I accept I made an error of judgment and took the wrong course of action. I have therefore stepped back from my involvement in Sage [the government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies]. “I acted in the belief that I was immune, having tested positive for coronavirus, and completely isolated myself for almost two weeks after developing symptoms. “I deeply regret any undermining of the clear messages around the continued need for social distancing to control this devastating epidemic. The Government guidance is unequivocal, and is there to protect all of us.”
The professor is not the first government scientific figure forced to resign after taking a do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do posture to the general public. Breitbart London reported in April when the chief scientific advisor for Scotland resigned her position after ordering citizens to obey the lockdown measures while breaking them herself in public.
While Britons have been ordered to stay in their normal residences and not travel to their country homes in hope of enjoying a more comfortable and less cramped lockdown period, Dr Catherine Calderwood was photographed travelling to her country home. She received a police warning after being exposed in a national newspaper and resigned shortly afterwards.
Monica Lennon, health spokesman for Scottish Labour, remarked that Calderwood’s actions were “extremely disappointing and hypocritical”, and asked: “If the Chief Medical Officer can’t lead by example what chance do we have of convincing people to stay at home?”
In New Zealand, the government’s health minister was demoted after ignoring his own advice. Dr David Clark was photographed going for a country bike ride, and subsequently drove his family to the beach to go surfing. Reflecting on his breaking the advice of his own department, Dr Clark noted: “I’ve been an idiot”.
Read more at www.breitbart.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-05--Italian Study Reveals COVID-19 Death Toll is Exaggerated

A new report published in Italy , compiled with help from doctors involved with treating COVID-19 cases , undermines government and mainstream media claims of high mortality due to the disease .
It is published ( April 29 , 2020 ) in Istituto Superiore di Sanità : Epidemiology for public health and titled : ‘ Characteristics of patients who died positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection in Italy.
’ [ 1 ] In summary , these medical professionals report that no more that 3.8 % of deaths in Italy could be verified as being from COVID-19 .
The most reasonable and accurate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 96 % of those patients in Italy had died WITH COVID-19 ( or with comparable symptoms of pneumonia ) .
Italian recorded deaths , in 60 % of cases were accompanied by three or more chronic co-morbidities .
This small group of doctors has been releasing their statistics for two months now , detailing a breakdown of the data concerning everyone who died .
They initially tried to convey their findings to the mainstream media and Italian national press but were ignored .
It appears authorities were not interested in investigating their warnings @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
All that has been presented on media broadcasts are simplistic and misleading accounts , such as there were “ 500 Italian Coronavirus deaths today ” etc .
The report identifies the majority of the reported COVID-19 dead ( 60 % ) had MORE than 3 existing illnesses : Joseph Sullivan ( no relation ) contacted the Italian state health department for more information .
He has been following these reports since they began in English six weeks ago .
But the key distinction that needs to be made here is that so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and not from the disease , which is still not being been conveyed by the press .
Joseph Sullivan explains : “ Obviously that nuance is super important – while caution at the start was understandable by other governments , it doesn ’ t excuse the fact that hard data from the only western government that was giving it , was consistently ignored .
Data that showed lockdown was the wrong option categorically .
You can bet politicians and media knew .
( I called a lot of them , all recorded ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Scientific International , there appears an emerging pattern in first world nations of presenting the data in such a manner to maximize the appearance that the coronavirus is more deadly than is actually the case .
About the author : John O ’ Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder ( with Dr Tim Ball ) of Principia Scientific International ( PSI ) .
John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert , Michael ‘ hockey stick ’ Mann in the ‘ science @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘ Slayers ’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world ’ s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Italian Study Reveals COVID-19 Death Toll is Exaggerated
Written by John O'Sullivan
A new report published in Italy, compiled with help from doctors involved with treating COVID-19 cases, undermines government and mainstream media claims of high mortality due to the disease.
It is published (April 29, 2020) in Istituto Superiore di Sanità: Epidemiology for public health and titled: ‘Characteristics of patients who died positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection in Italy.’ [1]
In summary, these medical professionals report that no more that 3.8{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of deaths in Italy could be verified as being from COVID-19.
The most reasonable and accurate claim that can be made is that 96{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of those patients in Italy had died WITH COVID-19 (or with comparable symptoms of pneumonia).
Italian recorded deaths, in 60{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of cases were accompanied by three or more chronic co-morbidities.
This small group of doctors has been releasing their statistics for two months now, detailing a breakdown of the data concerning everyone who died. They initially tried to convey their findings to the mainstream media and Italian national press but were ignored. It appears authorities were not interested in investigating their warnings of widespread mis-allocation of deaths to COVID-19.
All that has been presented on media broadcasts are simplistic and misleading accounts, such as there were “500 Italian Coronavirus deaths today ” etc.
https://www.epicentro.iss.it/coronavirus/sars-cov-2-decessi-italia
The report identifies the majority of the reported COVID-19 dead (60{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}) had MORE than 3 existing illnesses:
“This figure was obtained from 2351 deceased for whom it was possible to analyze the medical records. The average number of pathologies observed in this population is 3.3 (median 3, Standard Deviation 1.9). Overall, 90 patients (3.8{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of the sample) had 0 pathologies, 340 (14.5{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}) had 1 pathology, 504 (21.4{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}) had 2 pathologies and 1417 (60.3{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}) had 3 or more pathologies .”
Joseph Sullivan (no relation) contacted the Italian state health department for more information. He has been following these reports since they began in English six weeks ago. But the key distinction that needs to be made here is that so many of these reported deaths are with and not from the disease, which is still not being been conveyed by the press. Joseph Sullivan explains:
“Obviously that nuance is super important – while caution at the start was understandable by other governments, it doesn’t excuse the fact that hard data from the only western government that was giving it, was consistently ignored. Data that showed lockdown was the wrong option categorically. You can bet politicians and media knew. (I called a lot of them, all recorded).”
As already reported in Principia Scientific International, there appears an emerging pattern in first world nations of presenting the data in such a manner to maximize the appearance that the coronavirus is more deadly than is actually the case.
[1] https://www.epicentro.iss.it/coronavirus/sars-cov-2-decessi-italia
About the author: John O’Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI). John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-05--April in N. Hemisphere Had 2nd-biggest 2-Month Temp Drop

In April 2020 , the Northern Hemisphere experienced its second-largest two-month drop in temperature in the 497-month satellite record .
The Version 6.0 global average lower tropospheric temperature ( LT ) anomaly for April 2020 was +0.38 deg .
C , down from the March 2020 value of +0.48 deg .
C. The Northern Hemisphere temperature anomaly fell from +0.96 deg .
C to 0.43 deg .
C from February to April , a 0.53 deg .
C drop that is the second-largest two-month drop in the 497-month satellite record .
The largest two-month drop was -0.69 deg .
C @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The linear warming trend since January 1979 has now increased to +0.14 C/decade ( but remains statistically unchanged at +0.12 C/decade over the global-averaged oceans , and +0.18 C/decade over global-averaged land ) .
Various regional LT departures from the 30-year ( 1981-2010 ) average for the last 16 months are : The UAH LT global gridpoint anomaly image for April 2020 should be available within the next week here .
The global and regional monthly anomalies for the various atmospheric layers we monitor should be available in the next few days at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

April in N. Hemisphere Had 2nd-biggest 2-Month Temp Drop
Written by Roy W Spencer PhD
UPDATE: Changed emphasis from Northern Hemisphere extratropics to entire Northern Hemisphere (h/t John Christy)
In April 2020, the Northern Hemisphere experienced its second-largest two-month drop in temperature in the 497-month satellite record.
The Version 6.0 global average lower tropospheric temperature (LT) anomaly for April 2020 was +0.38 deg. C, down from the March 2020 value of +0.48 deg. C.
The Northern Hemisphere temperature anomaly fell from +0.96 deg. C to 0.43 deg. C from February to April, a 0.53 deg. C drop that is the second-largest two-month drop in the 497-month satellite record. The largest two-month drop was -0.69 deg. C from December 1987 to February 1988.
The linear warming trend since January 1979 has now increased to +0.14 C/decade (but remains statistically unchanged at +0.12 C/decade over the global-averaged oceans, and +0.18 C/decade over global-averaged land).
Various regional LT departures from the 30-year (1981-2010) average for the last 16 months are:
YEAR MO GLOBE NHEM. SHEM. TROPIC USA48 ARCTIC AUST 2019 01 +0.38 +0.35 +0.41 +0.36 +0.53 -0.15 +1.15 2019 02 +0.37 +0.47 +0.28 +0.43 -0.02 +1.04 +0.06 2019 03 +0.35 +0.44 +0.25 +0.41 -0.55 +0.97 +0.59 2019 04 +0.44 +0.38 +0.51 +0.54 +0.49 +0.92 +0.91 2019 05 +0.32 +0.29 +0.35 +0.40 -0.61 +0.98 +0.39 2019 06 +0.47 +0.42 +0.52 +0.64 -0.64 +0.91 +0.35 2019 07 +0.38 +0.33 +0.44 +0.45 +0.10 +0.33 +0.87 2019 08 +0.39 +0.38 +0.39 +0.42 +0.17 +0.44 +0.24 2019 09 +0.62 +0.64 +0.59 +0.60 +1.14 +0.75 +0.57 2019 10 +0.46 +0.64 +0.28 +0.31 -0.03 +0.99 +0.50 2019 11 +0.55 +0.56 +0.54 +0.55 +0.21 +0.56 +0.38 2019 12 +0.56 +0.61 +0.50 +0.58 +0.92 +0.66 +0.94 2020 01 +0.57 +0.60 +0.53 +0.62 +0.73 +0.12 +0.66 2020 02 +0.76 +0.96 +0.55 +0.76 +0.38 +0.02 +0.30 2020 03 +0.48 +0.61 +0.34 +0.63 +1.09 -0.72 +0.17 2020 04 +0.38 +0.43 +0.34 +0.45 -0.59 +1.03 +0.97
The UAH LT global gridpoint anomaly image for April 2020 should be available within the next week here.
The global and regional monthly anomalies for the various atmospheric layers we monitor should be available in the next few days at the following locations:
Lower Troposphere: http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/v6.0/tlt/uahncdc_lt_6.0.txt
Mid-Troposphere: http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/v6.0/tmt/uahncdc_mt_6.0.txt
Tropopause: http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/v6.0/ttp/uahncdc_tp_6.0.txt
Lower Stratosphere: http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/v6.0/tls/uahncdc_ls_6.0.txt
Read more at Dr. Roy’s Blog
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-05--Alarmist Fail: Data Shows More CO2 Boosts Crops, Yields

At the very top of Google News searches for “ climate change ” this week , an article in The Conversation falsely claims more atmospheric carbon dioxide will bring few if any benefits regarding plant life .
The article completely ignores many documented benefits of carbon dioxide for crops and plant life .
The article , “ Climate explained : why higher carbon dioxide levels aren ’ t good news , even if some plants grow faster , ” claims : “ At best , you might be mowing your lawn twice as often or harvesting your plantation forests faster.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ acknowledges in passing that increased carbon dioxide helps plants grow faster and larger , and even improves their use of water .
He attempts to dismiss this by putting the worst possible spin on it , suggesting that the primary result is people will have to more frequently engage in the unpleasant task of mowing our lawns .
Putting the worst possible spin on good climate news is a common tactic of climate activists .
Higher carbon dioxide levels and modest warming have resulted in crop yields setting records nearly every year .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ lawns more frequently , and an incredible benefit for human health and welfare .
Also , greater crop yields mean we can preserve more open spaces for the environment rather than farms .
Leuzinger also complains that more abundant , faster-growing plant life will not necessarily absorb more carbon from the atmosphere .
But we don ’ t want all or most of the atmosphere ’ s carbon dioxide to be locked away forever .
Rather we want plants to use it to grow more abundantly , providing food for plant and animal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
As documented in Climate Change Reconsidered : Biological Impacts ( CCRBI ) , carbon dioxide enriched plant growth has contributed to record crop yields , helping to bring about the largest decline in hunger , malnutrition , and starvation in human history .
So , regardless of what climate alarmists and their media sock puppets say , more abundant and faster-growing plant life is more than simply mowing our lawns more frequently .
More atmospheric carbon dioxide benefits crop production , plant life , and human health and welfare .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Alarmist Fail: Data Shows More CO2 Boosts Crops, Yields
Written by H Sterling Burnett
At the very top of Google News searches for “climate change” this week, an article in The Conversation falsely claims more atmospheric carbon dioxide will bring few if any benefits regarding plant life.
The article completely ignores many documented benefits of carbon dioxide for crops and plant life.
The article, “Climate explained: why higher carbon dioxide levels aren’t good news, even if some plants grow faster,” claims: “At best, you might be mowing your lawn twice as often or harvesting your plantation forests faster.”
The author, Sebastian Leuzinger, acknowledges in passing that increased carbon dioxide helps plants grow faster and larger, and even improves their use of water.
He attempts to dismiss this by putting the worst possible spin on it, suggesting that the primary result is people will have to more frequently engage in the unpleasant task of mowing our lawns.
Putting the worst possible spin on good climate news is a common tactic of climate activists.
Higher carbon dioxide levels and modest warming have resulted in crop yields setting records nearly every year. This is much more impactful than mowing lawns more frequently, and an incredible benefit for human health and welfare.
Also, greater crop yields mean we can preserve more open spaces for the environment rather than farms.
Leuzinger also complains that more abundant, faster-growing plant life will not necessarily absorb more carbon from the atmosphere.
But we don’t want all or most of the atmosphere’s carbon dioxide to be locked away forever. Rather we want plants to use it to grow more abundantly, providing food for plant and animal life on land and in the oceans.
As documented in Climate Change Reconsidered: Biological Impacts (CCRBI), carbon dioxide enriched plant growth has contributed to record crop yields, helping to bring about the largest decline in hunger, malnutrition, and starvation in human history.
So, regardless of what climate alarmists and their media sock puppets say, more abundant and faster-growing plant life is more than simply mowing our lawns more frequently.
More atmospheric carbon dioxide benefits crop production, plant life, and human health and welfare.
Read more at Climate Realism
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-05--Shock: CDC Slashes COVID-19 U.S. Death Rate – From 60,000 to 37,000

Shock : CDC Slashes COVID-19 U.S. Death Rate – From 60,000 to 37,000 The CDC just readjusted the COVID-19 death numbers .
They ’ ve dropped significantly , causing many people to wonder what the heck is going on .
The number of Coronavirus dead went DOWN from 60,000 U.S. deaths to 37,000 .
The more inflated number is being called a “ gaffe ” apparently , although there ’ s still some confusion as to what exactly this adjustment means .
Regardless , this confusion is sure to further erode public trust in the “ experts.
” The public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ million deaths were whittled down to 200k and then whittle down to 60k .
That ’ s not to say we ’ re not terribly sad to lose even one American life to this wretched virus .
It ’ s awful and sad and shouldn ’ t have happened this way .
Thanks , China .
But how did the experts get this entire thing so wrong ?
Will there be an investigation into this so we can understand why the numbers were so wildly off and our media touted them without even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was on the up and up ?
And those people suggesting that “ social distancing ” brought the numbers down are feeding you a line of BS .
Every single model – even the ones predicting 5.2 million Americans dead – factored in “ 100 % social distancing ” in the model and quarantine levels that we did not even come remotely close to in this country .
Some folks are speculating that perhaps pneumonia deaths were lumped in with the COVID deaths ?
Others , like conservative pundit and filmmaker Dinesh D @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the “ error ” was more about funding than anything else .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Shock: CDC Slashes COVID-19 U.S. Death Rate – From 60,000 to 37,000
Written by Missy Crane
The CDC just readjusted the COVID-19 death numbers. They’ve dropped significantly, causing many people to wonder what the heck is going on.
The number of Coronavirus dead went DOWN from 60,000 U.S. deaths to 37,000.
The more inflated number is being called a “gaffe” apparently, although there’s still some confusion as to what exactly this adjustment means.
Just like that, CDC reduces its #Coronavirus death count to 37,000. That’s nearly HALF the total they were peddling. Did 30,000 people spring back to life like Lazarus? No, this seems a “gaffe”—defined as a case of the CDC accidentally telling the truth https://t.co/fkrbxDbPem — Dinesh D’Souza (@DineshDSouza) May 2, 2020
Regardless, this confusion is sure to further erode public trust in the “experts.”
The public was already leery after the projected 5 million deaths were whittled down to 200k and then whittle down to 60k.
That’s not to say we’re not terribly sad to lose even one American life to this wretched virus. It’s awful and sad and shouldn’t have happened this way. Thanks, China.
But how did the experts get this entire thing so wrong? Will there be an investigation into this so we can understand why the numbers were so wildly off and our media touted them without even a second glance to make sure everything was on the up and up?
And those people suggesting that “social distancing” brought the numbers down are feeding you a line of BS. Every single model – even the ones predicting 5.2 million Americans dead – factored in “100{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} social distancing” in the model and quarantine levels that we did not even come remotely close to in this country.
Some folks are speculating that perhaps pneumonia deaths were lumped in with the COVID deaths?
.@CDCgov chart says that as of May 1, 2020, total #COVID19 deaths are 37,308 (delayed due to reporting issues). Why is @JohnsHopkinsSPH number 65,068 today? Truly, I don’t know. Note, too, that CDC says total deaths is 97{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of expected, i.e. less than expected. Death rate of 0.3{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}? pic.twitter.com/36G2j9J9jA — Martin Cowen (@mlcowen) May 2, 2020
Others, like conservative pundit and filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza, are suggesting that perhaps the “error” was more about funding than anything else.
CDC continues to peddle 60,000 plus deaths from #Coronavirus but this seems to be the padded number or “funding-oriented” statistic. Here’s the CDC’s real number, screen shot from its own site pic.twitter.com/wBWawQfLSL — Dinesh D’Souza (@DineshDSouza) May 2, 2020
Read more at www.waynedupree.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-05--Fauci knew about HCQ in 2005 – nobody needed to die

Fauci knew about HCQ in 2005 – nobody needed to die Dr. Anthony Fauci , whose “ expert ” advice to President Trump has resulted in the complete shutdown of the greatest economic engine in world history , has known since 2005 that chloroquine is an effective inhibitor of coronaviruses .
How did he know this ?
Because of research done by the National Institutes of Health , of which he is the director .
In connection with the SARS outbreak – caused by a coronavirus dubbed SARS- CoV – the NIH researched chloroquine and concluded that it was effective @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tracks .
The COVID-19 bug is likewise a coronavirus , labeled SARS-CoV-2 .
While not exactly the same virus as SARS-CoV-1 , it is genetically related to it , and shares 79 % of its genome , as the name SARS-CoV-2 implies .
They both use the same host cell receptor , which is what viruses use to gain entry to the cell and infect the victim .
The Virology Journal – the official publication of Dr. Fauci ’ s National Institutes of Health – published what is now a blockbuster article on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ heading – get ready for this – “ Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.
” ( Emphasis mine throughout . )
Write the researchers , “ We report…that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells .
These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus , suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.
” This means , of course , that Dr. Fauci ( pictured at right ) has known for 15 years @ @ @ @ @ @ @ milder derivative hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) will not only treat a current case of coronavirus ( “ therapeutic ” ) but prevent future cases ( “ prophylactic ” ) .
So HCQ functions as both a cure and a vaccine .
In other words , it ’ s a wonder drug for coronavirus .
Said Dr. Fauci ’ s NIH in 2005 , “ concentrations of 10 μM completely abolished SARS-CoV infection.
” Fauci ’ s researchers add , “ chloroquine can effectively reduce the establishment of infection and spread of SARS-CoV.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of France , had such spectacular success using HCQ to treat victims of SARS-CoV-2 that he said way back on February 25 that “ it ’ s game over ” for coronavirus .
He and a team of researchers reported that the use of HCQ administered with both azithromycin and zinc cured 79 of 80 patients with only “ rare and minor ” adverse events .
“ In conclusion , ” these researchers write , “ we confirm the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine associated with azithromycin in the treatment of COVID-19 and its potential @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” The highly-publicized VA study that purported to show HCQ was ineffective showed nothing of the sort .
HCQ wasn ’ t administered until the patients were virtually on their deathbeds when research indicates it should be prescribed as soon as symptoms are apparent .
Plus , HCQ was administered without azithromycin and zinc , which form the cocktail that makes it supremely effective .
At-risk individuals need to receive the HCQ cocktail at the first sign of symptoms .
But Governor Andrew Cuomo banned the use of HCQ in the entire state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Democrat governors of Nevada and Michigan soon followed suit , and by March 28 the whole country was under incarceration-in-place fatwas .
Nothing happened with regard to the use of HCQ in the U.S. until March 20 , when President Trump put his foot down and insisted that the FDA consider authorizing HCQ for off-label use to treat SARS-CoV-2 .
On March 23 , Dr. Vladimir Zelenko reported that he had treated around 500 coronavirus patients with HCQ and had seen an astonishing 100 % success rate .
That ’ s not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sneers at , but actual results with real patients in clinical settings .
“ Since last Thursday , my team has treated approximately 350 patients in Kiryas Joel and another 150 patients in other areas of New York with the above regimen .
Of this group and the information provided to me by affiliated medical teams , we have had ZERO deaths , ZERO hospitalizations , and ZERO intubations .
In addition , I have not heard of any negative side effects other than approximately 10 % of patients with temporary nausea and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nationally , the economy will rebound much quicker .
The country will open again .
And let me tell you a very important point .
This treatment costs about $ 20 .
That ’ s very important because you can scale that nationally .
If every treatment costs $ 20,000 , that ’ s not so good .
All I ’ m doing is repurposing old , available drugs which we know their safety profiles , and using them in a unique combination in an outpatient setting.
” The questions are disturbing to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has known since 2005 of the effectiveness of HCQ , why hasn ’ t it been administered immediately after people show symptoms , as Dr. Zelenko has done ?
Maybe then nobody would have died and nobody would have been incarcerated in place except the sick , which is who a quarantine is for in the first place .
To paraphrase Jesus , it ’ s not the symptom-free who need HCQ but the sick .
And they need it at the first sign of symptoms .
While the regressive health care establishment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ administered late in the course of the infection , from a medical standpoint , this is stupid .
Said one doctor , “ As a physician , this baffles me .
I can ’ t think of a single infectious condition — bacterial , fungal , or viral — where the best medical treatment is to delay the use of an anti-bacterial , anti-fungal , or anti-viral until the infection is far advanced.
” So why has Dr. Fauci minimized and dismissed HCQ at every turn instead of pushing this thing from jump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ launch clinical trials of HCQ until April 9 , by which time 33,000 people had died .
This may be why : “ Chloroquine , a relatively safe , effective and cheap drug used for treating many human diseases…is effective in inhibiting the infection and spread of SARS CoV.
” That ’ s the problem .
It is safe , inexpensive , and it works – in other words , there ’ s nothing sexy or avant-garde about HCQ .
It ’ s been around since 1934 .
Given human nature , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that those who are chasing the unicorn of a coronavirus vaccine are doing so for reasons other than human health .
I can ’ t see into anybody ’ s heart , and can ’ t presume to know their motives , but on the other hand , human nature recognizes that there ’ s no glory in pushing HCQ , and nobody is going to get anything named for him in the history books .
The polio vaccine was developed by Jonas Salk in 1954 , and it is still known as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be no “ Fauci vaccine ” if HCQ is the answer to the problem .
So while Dr. Fauci is tut-tutting and pooh-poohing HCQ , Dr. Raoult and Dr. Zelensky are out there saving lives at $ 20 a pop .
Maybe we should spend more time listening to them than the wizards-of-smart bureaucrats the Talking Snake Media fawns over .
Dr. Fauci is regarded by the Talking Snake Media as the Oracle at Delphi .
The entire nation hangs on his every word .
But if nobody is dying and nobody is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fame fades to zero .
Very few people are not going to be influenced by that prospect , especially when it ’ s easy to keep the attention of the public by continuing to feed the panic .
It should not be overlooked that there is no money in HCQ for Big Pharma since HCQ is a generic that can be manufactured so cheaply there is little profit margin in it .
On the other hand , the payday for a vaccine will literally be off-the-charts .
Who knows what kind of behind-the-scenes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ others in the health care establishment ?
There is a monstrous reputational risk for those who will be found to have dismissively waved off a treatment that could have been used from the very beginning , even back on February 15 when Dr. Fauci said that the risk from Coronavirus was “ minuscule.
” How many lives could have been saved if the heads of our multi-billion dollar health care bureaucracy had been advocating for HCQ treatment from day one ?
We ’ ll never know .
Instead , their advice has been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that word .
Someday – maybe even today – we will be able to identify the individuals who had the knowledge and expertise to make a global difference , but turned up their noses at the solution when it could have made all the difference in the world .

Fauci knew about HCQ in 2005 – nobody needed to die
Written by Bryan Fischer
Dr. Anthony Fauci, whose “expert” advice to President Trump has resulted in the complete shutdown of the greatest economic engine in world history, has known since 2005 that chloroquine is an effective inhibitor of coronaviruses.
How did he know this? Because of research done by the National Institutes of Health, of which he is the director. In connection with the SARS outbreak – caused by a coronavirus dubbed SARS- CoV – the NIH researched chloroquine and concluded that it was effective at stopping the SARS coronavirus in its tracks.
The COVID-19 bug is likewise a coronavirus, labeled SARS-CoV-2. While not exactly the same virus as SARS-CoV-1, it is genetically related to it, and shares 79{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of its genome, as the name SARS-CoV-2 implies. They both use the same host cell receptor, which is what viruses use to gain entry to the cell and infect the victim.
The Virology Journal – the official publication of Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Health – published what is now a blockbuster article on August 22, 2005, under the heading – get ready for this – “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” (Emphasis mine throughout.) Write the researchers, “We report…that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.”
This means, of course, that Dr. Fauci (pictured at right) has known for 15 years that chloroquine and it’s even milder derivative hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) will not only treat a current case of coronavirus (“therapeutic”) but prevent future cases (“prophylactic”). So HCQ functions as both a cure and a vaccine. In other words, it’s a wonder drug for coronavirus. Said Dr. Fauci’s NIH in 2005, “concentrations of 10 μM completely abolished SARS-CoV infection.” Fauci’s researchers add, “chloroquine can effectively reduce the establishment of infection and spread of SARS-CoV.”
Dr. Didier Raoult, the Anthony Fauci of France, had such spectacular success using HCQ to treat victims of SARS-CoV-2 that he said way back on February 25 that “it’s game over” for coronavirus.
He and a team of researchers reported that the use of HCQ administered with both azithromycin and zinc cured 79 of 80 patients with only “rare and minor” adverse events. “In conclusion,” these researchers write, “we confirm the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine associated with azithromycin in the treatment of COVID-19 and its potential effectiveness in the early impairment of contagiousness.”
The highly-publicized VA study that purported to show HCQ was ineffective showed nothing of the sort. HCQ wasn’t administered until the patients were virtually on their deathbeds when research indicates it should be prescribed as soon as symptoms are apparent. Plus, HCQ was administered without azithromycin and zinc, which form the cocktail that makes it supremely effective. At-risk individuals need to receive the HCQ cocktail at the first sign of symptoms.
But Governor Andrew Cuomo banned the use of HCQ in the entire state of New York on March 6, the Democrat governors of Nevada and Michigan soon followed suit, and by March 28 the whole country was under incarceration-in-place fatwas.
Nothing happened with regard to the use of HCQ in the U.S. until March 20, when President Trump put his foot down and insisted that the FDA consider authorizing HCQ for off-label use to treat SARS-CoV-2.
On March 23, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko reported that he had treated around 500 coronavirus patients with HCQ and had seen an astonishing 100{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} success rate. That’s not the “anecdotal” evidence Dr. Fauci sneers at, but actual results with real patients in clinical settings.
“Since last Thursday, my team has treated approximately 350 patients in Kiryas Joel and another 150 patients in other areas of New York with the above regimen. Of this group and the information provided to me by affiliated medical teams, we have had ZERO deaths, ZERO hospitalizations, and ZERO intubations. In addition, I have not heard of any negative side effects other than approximately 10{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of patients with temporary nausea and diarrhea.”
Said Dr. Zelenko:
“If you scale this nationally, the economy will rebound much quicker. The country will open again. And let me tell you a very important point. This treatment costs about $20. That’s very important because you can scale that nationally. If every treatment costs $20,000, that’s not so good.
All I’m doing is repurposing old, available drugs which we know their safety profiles, and using them in a unique combination in an outpatient setting.”
The questions are disturbing to a spectacular degree. If Dr. Fauci has known since 2005 of the effectiveness of HCQ, why hasn’t it been administered immediately after people show symptoms, as Dr. Zelenko has done? Maybe then nobody would have died and nobody would have been incarcerated in place except the sick, which is who a quarantine is for in the first place. To paraphrase Jesus, it’s not the symptom-free who need HCQ but the sick. And they need it at the first sign of symptoms.
While the regressive health care establishment wants the HCQ cocktail to only be administered late in the course of the infection, from a medical standpoint, this is stupid. Said one doctor, “As a physician, this baffles me. I can’t think of a single infectious condition — bacterial, fungal, or viral — where the best medical treatment is to delay the use of an anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, or anti-viral until the infection is far advanced.”
So why has Dr. Fauci minimized and dismissed HCQ at every turn instead of pushing this thing from jump street? He didn’t even launch clinical trials of HCQ until April 9, by which time 33,000 people had died.
This may be why: “Chloroquine, a relatively safe, effective and cheap drug used for treating many human diseases…is effective in inhibiting the infection and spread of SARS CoV.” That’s the problem. It is safe, inexpensive, and it works – in other words, there’s nothing sexy or avant-garde about HCQ. It’s been around since 1934.
Given human nature, it’s possible, even likely, that those who are chasing the unicorn of a coronavirus vaccine are doing so for reasons other than human health. I can’t see into anybody’s heart, and can’t presume to know their motives, but on the other hand, human nature recognizes that there’s no glory in pushing HCQ, and nobody is going to get anything named for him in the history books. The polio vaccine was developed by Jonas Salk in 1954, and it is still known as the “Salk vaccine.” There will be no “Fauci vaccine” if HCQ is the answer to the problem.
So while Dr. Fauci is tut-tutting and pooh-poohing HCQ, Dr. Raoult and Dr. Zelensky are out there saving lives at $20 a pop. Maybe we should spend more time listening to them than the wizards-of-smart bureaucrats the Talking Snake Media fawns over.
Dr. Fauci is regarded by the Talking Snake Media as the Oracle at Delphi. The entire nation hangs on his every word. But if nobody is dying and nobody is locked down, his 15 minutes of fame fades to zero. Very few people are not going to be influenced by that prospect, especially when it’s easy to keep the attention of the public by continuing to feed the panic.
It should not be overlooked that there is no money in HCQ for Big Pharma since HCQ is a generic that can be manufactured so cheaply there is little profit margin in it. On the other hand, the payday for a vaccine will literally be off-the-charts. Who knows what kind of behind-the-scenes pressure is being put on Fauci and others in the health care establishment?
There is a monstrous reputational risk for those who will be found to have dismissively waved off a treatment that could have been used from the very beginning, even back on February 15 when Dr. Fauci said that the risk from Coronavirus was “minuscule.” How many lives could have been saved if the heads of our multi-billion dollar health care bureaucracy had been advocating for HCQ treatment from day one? We’ll never know. Instead, their advice has been dangerous and deadly in every sense of that word.
Someday – maybe even today – we will be able to identify the individuals who had the knowledge and expertise to make a global difference, but turned up their noses at the solution when it could have made all the difference in the world.
Bryan Fischer hosts “Focal Point with Bryan Fischer” every weekday on AFR Talk (American Family Radio) from 1:00 – 2:00 p.m. (Central). He is author of The Boy to Man Book: Preparing Your Son for Manhood. This column first appeared on The Stand, the official blog site for American Family Association. ***** PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-06--New Sham Study Means Greek, Roman, Egyptian Empires Never Existed

Seemingly all of the major news media are breathlessly reporting today on a study claiming up to 3 billion people will live in “ nearly unlivable ” hot conditions by the year 2070 .
A look at the sham study , however , shows that if the study ’ s claims were correct , none of the Egyptian , Babylonian , Greek , or Roman empires could have existed .
Instead , publicity-seeking pseudo-scientists realize that the easiest path to fame , glory , and media adulation is to make outrageous climate claims that bear no semblance to real-world climate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ study ” , published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ( PNAS ) : If global warming continues unchecked , the heat that ’ s coming later this century in some parts of the world will bring “ nearly unlivable ” conditions for up to 3 billion people , a study released Monday said .
The authors predict that by 2070 , much of the world ’ s population is likely to live in climate conditions that are “ warmer than conditions deemed suitable for human life to flourish.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ gas emissions are curtailed , average annual temperatures will rise beyond the climate “ niche ” in which humans have thrived for 6,000 years .
That “ niche ” is equivalent to average yearly temperatures of roughly 52 to 59 Fahrenheit .
The researchers found that people , despite all forms of innovations and migrations , have mostly lived in these climate conditions for several thousand years .
Serious glaring errors are immediately apparent .
Scientists estimate the present average temperature of the Earth is 59 degrees Fahrenheit .
Scientists , including scientists @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Panel on Climate Change ( IPCC ) report , have long known that most of the past 6,000 years were warmer than today ( see the IPCC chart below , found at pg .
202 , here ) .
So , according to the new study , any city that currently experiences temperatures above 59 degrees would similarly be “ nearly unlivable ” during earlier times .
In fact , such cities would be even less livable in earlier times .
Rome , Italy , currently has an average temperature of 59.4 degrees @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it , therefore , must be “ nearly unlivable ” and “ warmer than conditions suitable for human life to flourish.
” Tell that to the people in Rome , and the people from all over the world who vacation there , in part due to its ideal climate .
If Rome has always been nearly unlivable and almost impossible for human life to flourish , how did the city of Rome form , grow , prosper , and support an entire empire ?
Athens , Greece , currently has an average temperature @ @ @ @ @ @ @ above the upper limit of temperatures the new study says is livable and suitable for human life to flourish .
If Athens has always been nearly unlivable and almost impossible for human life to flourish , how did the city of Athens form , grow , prosper , and flourish as the heart of an entire empire ?
Cairo , Egypt , currently has an average temperature of 71.2 degrees .
This is more than 12 degrees above the upper limit of temperatures the new study says is livable and suitable for human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ always been nearly unlivable and almost impossible for human life to flourish , how did Egypt form , grow , prosper , and support an entire empire ?
Baghdad , Iraq , near the ancient city of Babylon , currently has an average temperature of 73.2 degrees .
This is more than 14 degrees above the upper limit of temperatures the new study says is livable and suitable for human life to flourish .
If Baghdad/Babylon has always been nearly unlivable and almost impossible for human life to flourish , how did the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prosper , and flourish as the heart of an entire empire ?
Here are some American cities , and their present average temperatures , for comparison : All of the above cities are considered to have a highly desirable climate .
All but San Francisco have average temperatures well above 59 degrees .
Even notoriously cool San Francisco is very close to being an “ unlivable ” hot city , according to the study .
Obviously , most people would not consider San Francisco to be borderline too hot to live in .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ further .
Do the millions of people who choose to live in Phoenix , Arizona – many precisely because of its desirable climate – feel that its 75.1-degree average temperature is 16 degrees hotter than what is considered “ livable ” ?
How about Ft. Lauderdale , Florida , where millions of Americans dream of retiring ?
Is Ft. Lauderdale ’ s 76.5-degree average temperature unlivable ?
The temperatures of cities that forged ancient empires and the temperatures of cities that today are considered to have an ideal climate show that the new @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outlets that breathlessly and uncritically report on such a garbage study – including USA Today , the Washington Post , BBC News , and Yahoo News – are equally useless .
Ancient empires did exist , and their people flourished in temperatures much warmer than today .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

New Sham Study Means Greek, Roman, Egyptian Empires Never Existed
Written by James Taylor
Seemingly all of the major news media are breathlessly reporting today on a study claiming up to 3 billion people will live in “nearly unlivable” hot conditions by the year 2070.
A look at the sham study, however, shows that if the study’s claims were correct, none of the Egyptian, Babylonian, Greek, or Roman empires could have existed.
Instead, publicity-seeking pseudo-scientists realize that the easiest path to fame, glory, and media adulation is to make outrageous climate claims that bear no semblance to real-world climate or history.
USA Today summarizes the “study”, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS):
If global warming continues unchecked, the heat that’s coming later this century in some parts of the world will bring “nearly unlivable” conditions for up to 3 billion people, a study released Monday said. The authors predict that by 2070, much of the world’s population is likely to live in climate conditions that are “warmer than conditions deemed suitable for human life to flourish.” The study warned that unless greenhouse gas emissions are curtailed, average annual temperatures will rise beyond the climate “niche” in which humans have thrived for 6,000 years. That “niche” is equivalent to average yearly temperatures of roughly 52 to 59 Fahrenheit. The researchers found that people, despite all forms of innovations and migrations, have mostly lived in these climate conditions for several thousand years.
Serious glaring errors are immediately apparent. Scientists estimate the present average temperature of the Earth is 59 degrees Fahrenheit.
Scientists, including scientists who published the very first UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, have long known that most of the past 6,000 years were warmer than today (see the IPCC chart below, found at pg. 202, here).
So, according to the new study, any city that currently experiences temperatures above 59 degrees would similarly be “nearly unlivable” during earlier times. In fact, such cities would be even less livable in earlier times.
Rome, Italy, currently has an average temperature of 59.4 degrees. According to the new study, it, therefore, must be “nearly unlivable” and “warmer than conditions suitable for human life to flourish.”
Tell that to the people in Rome, and the people from all over the world who vacation there, in part due to its ideal climate.
If Rome has always been nearly unlivable and almost impossible for human life to flourish, how did the city of Rome form, grow, prosper, and support an entire empire?
Athens, Greece, currently has an average temperature of 63.7 degrees. This is well above the upper limit of temperatures the new study says is livable and suitable for human life to flourish.
If Athens has always been nearly unlivable and almost impossible for human life to flourish, how did the city of Athens form, grow, prosper, and flourish as the heart of an entire empire?
Cairo, Egypt, currently has an average temperature of 71.2 degrees. This is more than 12 degrees above the upper limit of temperatures the new study says is livable and suitable for human life to flourish.
If Cairo has always been nearly unlivable and almost impossible for human life to flourish, how did Egypt form, grow, prosper, and support an entire empire?
Baghdad, Iraq, near the ancient city of Babylon, currently has an average temperature of 73.2 degrees. This is more than 14 degrees above the upper limit of temperatures the new study says is livable and suitable for human life to flourish.
If Baghdad/Babylon has always been nearly unlivable and almost impossible for human life to flourish, how did the city of Babylon form, grow, prosper, and flourish as the heart of an entire empire?
Here are some American cities, and their present average temperatures, for comparison:
San Francisco, California: 57.3 degrees
Los Angeles, California: 65.4 degrees
San Diego, California: 65.5 degrees
Hilton Head Island, South Carolina: 66 degrees
All of the above cities are considered to have a highly desirable climate. All but San Francisco have average temperatures well above 59 degrees.
Even notoriously cool San Francisco is very close to being an “unlivable” hot city, according to the study. Obviously, most people would not consider San Francisco to be borderline too hot to live in.
Let’s take this a step further. Do the millions of people who choose to live in Phoenix, Arizona – many precisely because of its desirable climate – feel that its 75.1-degree average temperature is 16 degrees hotter than what is considered “livable”?
How about Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, where millions of Americans dream of retiring? Is Ft. Lauderdale’s 76.5-degree average temperature unlivable?
The temperatures of cities that forged ancient empires and the temperatures of cities that today are considered to have an ideal climate show that the new PNAS study is complete garbage.
Media outlets that breathlessly and uncritically report on such a garbage study – including USA Today, the Washington Post, BBC News, and Yahoo News – are equally useless.
Ancient empires did exist, and their people flourished in temperatures much warmer than today.
Read more at Climate Realism
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-06--Study: No Increased Heart Risks for CV-19 Patients on CHQ/HCQ & Z-Pak

Study : No Increased Heart Risks for CV-19 Patients on CHQ/HCQ & Z-Pak Important new study is published in the Journal of the American Heart Association ( AHA ) on the largest reported cohort of COVID-19 patients to date treated with chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine ( with or without ) azithromycin .
This is welcome study signals a turning point in the way doctors can deal with the coronavirus pandemic .
It is a game-changer because it emphatically reveals no instances of TdP or arrhythmogenic death and also shows no adverse effects .
As such , it assuredly removes this one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in declining to use the ‘ Trump cure ’ – a cheap and effective re-purposed long-standing treatment ( for malaria and lupus ) .
POTUS was widely ridiculed in the mainstream media for recommending the drug combination in an early March press conference and thereafter on Twitter : However , this new study means there is no longer reason to deny the treatment to anyone with symptoms of COVID-19 under the pretense it may cause damage to their heart .
The much-awaited report was published on April 29 , 2020 under the title @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin on the Corrected QT Interval in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection ‘ appears online at www.ahajournals.org [ 1 ] The new study should now alleviate concerns expressed by some health experts that : Background – The novel SARs-CoV-2 coronavirus is responsible for the global COVID-19 pandemic .
Small studies have shown a potential benefit of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine ± azithromycin for the treatment of COVID-19 .
Use of these medications alone , or in combination , can lead to a prolongation of the QT interval , possibly increasing the risk of Torsade de @ @ @ @ @ @ @ death .
Methods – Hospitalized patients treated with chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine ± azithromycin from March 1st through the 23rd at three hospitals within the Northwell Health system were included in this prospective , observational study .
Serial assessments of the QT interval were performed .
The primary outcome was QT prolongation resulting in TdP .
Secondary outcomes included QT prolongation , the need to prematurely discontinue any of the medications due to QT prolongation and arrhythmogenic death .
Results – Two hundred one patients were treated for COVID-19 with chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine .
Ten patients ( 5.0 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 95.0 % ) received hydroxychloroquine and 119 ( 59.2 % ) also received azithromycin .
The primary outcome of TdP was not observed in the entire population .
Baseline QTc intervals did not differ between patients treated with chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine ( monotherapy group ) vs. those treated with combination group ( chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin ) ( 440.6 ± 24.9 ms vs. 439.9 ± 24.7 ms , p =0.834 ) .
The maximum QTc during treatment was significantly longer in the combination group vs the monotherapy group ( 470.4 ± 45.0 ms vs. 453.3 ± @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Seven patients ( 3.5 % ) required discontinuation of these medications due to QTc prolongation .
No arrhythmogenic deaths were reported .
Conclusions – In the largest reported cohort of COVID-19 patients to date treated with chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine { plus minus } azithromycin , no instances of TdP or arrhythmogenic death were reported .
Although use of these medications resulted in QT prolongation , clinicians seldomly needed to discontinue therapy .
Further study of the need for QT interval monitoring is needed before final recommendations can be made .
[ 1 ] https @ @ @ @ @ @ @ James Gabriels et al.
, ’ The Effect of Chloroquine , Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin on the Corrected QT Interval in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection ’ PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Study: No Increased Heart Risks for CV-19 Patients on CHQ/HCQ & Z-Pak
Written by John O'Sullivan
Important new study is published in the Journal of the American Heart Association (AHA) on the largest reported cohort of COVID-19 patients to date treated with chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine (with or without) azithromycin.
This is welcome study signals a turning point in the way doctors can deal with the coronavirus pandemic. It is a game-changer because it emphatically reveals no instances of TdP or arrhythmogenic death and also shows no adverse effects.
As such, it assuredly removes this one area of doubt expressed by medical experts in declining to use the ‘Trump cure’ – a cheap and effective re-purposed long-standing treatment (for malaria and lupus).
POTUS was widely ridiculed in the mainstream media for recommending the drug combination in an early March press conference and thereafter on Twitter:
However, this new study means there is no longer reason to deny the treatment to anyone with symptoms of COVID-19 under the pretense it may cause damage to their heart.
The much-awaited report was published on April 29, 2020 under the title, ‘The Effect of Chloroquine, Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin on the Corrected QT Interval in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection‘ appears online at www.ahajournals.org[1]
The new study should now alleviate concerns expressed by some health experts that:
“Hydroxychloroquine causes prolonged QT intervals and cardiac arrhythmias, so this needs to be considered in patients being treated with this drug for COVID-19.” [2]
Abstract Background – The novel SARs-CoV-2 coronavirus is responsible for the global COVID-19 pandemic. Small studies have shown a potential benefit of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine ± azithromycin for the treatment of COVID-19. Use of these medications alone, or in combination, can lead to a prolongation of the QT interval, possibly increasing the risk of Torsade de pointes (TdP) and sudden cardiac death. Methods – Hospitalized patients treated with chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine ± azithromycin from March 1st through the 23rd at three hospitals within the Northwell Health system were included in this prospective, observational study. Serial assessments of the QT interval were performed. The primary outcome was QT prolongation resulting in TdP. Secondary outcomes included QT prolongation, the need to prematurely discontinue any of the medications due to QT prolongation and arrhythmogenic death. Results – Two hundred one patients were treated for COVID-19 with chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine. Ten patients (5.0{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}) received chloroquine, 191 (95.0{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}) received hydroxychloroquine and 119 (59.2{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}) also received azithromycin. The primary outcome of TdP was not observed in the entire population. Baseline QTc intervals did not differ between patients treated with chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine (monotherapy group) vs. those treated with combination group (chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin) (440.6 ± 24.9 ms vs. 439.9 ± 24.7 ms, p =0.834). The maximum QTc during treatment was significantly longer in the combination group vs the monotherapy group (470.4 ± 45.0 ms vs. 453.3 ± 37.0 ms, p = 0.004). Seven patients (3.5{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}) required discontinuation of these medications due to QTc prolongation. No arrhythmogenic deaths were reported. Conclusions – In the largest reported cohort of COVID-19 patients to date treated with chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine {plus minus} azithromycin, no instances of TdP or arrhythmogenic death were reported. Although use of these medications resulted in QT prolongation, clinicians seldomly needed to discontinue therapy. Further study of the need for QT interval monitoring is needed before final recommendations can be made.
Footnotes
[1] https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008662#.XrG-i8LBjDA.twitter Moussa Saleh, James Gabriels et al.,’The Effect of Chloroquine, Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin on the Corrected QT Interval in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection’
[2] See: https://www.dicardiology.com/article/covid-19-hydroxychloroquine-treatment-brings-prolonged-qt-arrhythmia-issues
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-06--Farce: Some Fruit and a Goat Now Test COVID-19 Positive

Farce : Some Fruit and a Goat Now Test COVID-19 Positive DAR ES SALAAM ( Reuters ) – Tanzania has suspended the head of its national health laboratory in charge of testing for the coronavirus and ordered an investigation , a day after President John Magufuli questioned the tests ’ accuracy .
Magufuli said on Sunday the imported test kits were faulty as they had returned positive results on a goat and a pawpaw — among several non-human samples submitted for testing , with technicians left deliberately unaware of their origins .
He did not say where the kits had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had been suspicious of the results .
Catherine Sungura , acting head of communications at the ministry of health , said in a statement on Monday the director of the laboratory and its quality assurance manager had been immediately suspended “ to pave way for the investigation ” .
Sungura said a 10-person committee had been formed to investigate the laboratory ’ s operations , including its process of collecting and testing samples .
On Sunday , Magufuli also fired the head of the government Medical Stores Department , which is in charge @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government hospitals , but gave no reason .
As of Monday , Tanzania had recorded 480 cases of COVID-19 and 18 deaths , according to a Reuters tally based on government and World Health Organization data .
Unlike most other African countries , Tanzania sometimes goes for days without offering updates , with the last bulletin on cases on Wednesday .
COVID-19 infections and fatalities reported across Africa have been relatively low compared with the United States , parts of Asia and Europe .
But Africa also has extremely low levels of testing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ per million people .
In neighbouring Kenya , a senate body sought an explanation from the Health Ministry over the circumstances leading to the demotion of the head of the rapid response and team director in charge of the centre for virus research at the state-run Kenya Medical Research Institute .
“ In relation to the above , the committee observes that the timing of the dismissal is wrong as it is likely to have a significant impact on the morale and motivation of the various staff that were working under him , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the COVID-19 situation in Kenya said in a report on April 28 .
[ PSI Editor ’ s note : We will endeavor to update readers as and when further reports are released on the medical status of the fruit and goat ‘ patients ’ ] PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Farce: Some Fruit and a Goat Now Test COVID-19 Positive
Written by George Obulutsa
DAR ES SALAAM (Reuters) – Tanzania has suspended the head of its national health laboratory in charge of testing for the coronavirus and ordered an investigation, a day after President John Magufuli questioned the tests’ accuracy.
Magufuli said on Sunday the imported test kits were faulty as they had returned positive results on a goat and a pawpaw — among several non-human samples submitted for testing, with technicians left deliberately unaware of their origins.
He did not say where the kits had been imported from or why the authorities had been suspicious of the results.
Catherine Sungura, acting head of communications at the ministry of health, said in a statement on Monday the director of the laboratory and its quality assurance manager had been immediately suspended “to pave way for the investigation”.
Sungura said a 10-person committee had been formed to investigate the laboratory’s operations, including its process of collecting and testing samples.
On Sunday, Magufuli also fired the head of the government Medical Stores Department, which is in charge of distributing medical supplies and equipment to government hospitals, but gave no reason.
As of Monday, Tanzania had recorded 480 cases of COVID-19 and 18 deaths, according to a Reuters tally based on government and World Health Organization data.
Unlike most other African countries, Tanzania sometimes goes for days without offering updates, with the last bulletin on cases on Wednesday.
COVID-19 infections and fatalities reported across Africa have been relatively low compared with the United States, parts of Asia and Europe. But Africa also has extremely low levels of testing, with rates of only around 500 per million people.
In neighbouring Kenya, a senate body sought an explanation from the Health Ministry over the circumstances leading to the demotion of the head of the rapid response and team director in charge of the centre for virus research at the state-run Kenya Medical Research Institute.
“In relation to the above, the committee observes that the timing of the dismissal is wrong as it is likely to have a significant impact on the morale and motivation of the various staff that were working under him,” the Senate Ad Hoc Committee on the COVID-19 situation in Kenya said in a report on April 28.
Read more at www.reuters.com
[PSI Editor’s note: We will endeavor to update readers as and when further reports are released on the medical status of the fruit and goat ‘patients’ ]
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-06--NHS FAIL? UK Has Highest CV-19 Death Toll in Europe, 2nd Globally

The United Kingdom now has the highest recorded coronavirus death toll in Europe , surpassing virus hotspot Italy , and second globally only to the United States of America .
Latest data collated by Johns Hopkins University puts the UK at 29,501 deaths , ahead of Italy ’ s 29,351 deaths , with the U.S. having the highest number of fatalities at 71,078 as of Wednesday , May 6th .
However , the UK ’ s official statistics body , the Office for National Statistics ( ONS ) , puts coronavirus deaths in England and Wales as of May 2nd @ @ @ @ @ @ @ figure on the cause of death listed as coronavirus on death certificates , even if there is no confirmatory test , but doctors determine that it was likely the Chinese virus .
Different parts of the nation collect statistics at different periods , with Northern Ireland registering 393 deaths to April 29th and Scotland counting 2,272 up to April 26th , a total of 32,375 across the UK as of Wednesday , according to The Times .
That is almost half of the United States ’ s official death toll , with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s population , and despite the UK ’ s strict lockdown measures .
During the Downing Street press conference on Tuesday night , First Secretary of State Dominic Raab said of the 693 new deaths on the previous day : The head of Britain ’ s Office for National Statistics has praised the work of his colleagues , clearly pointing to a potential differential between the British figures and others around the world down to the quality of research and counting efficiency , implying other nations numbers may lag behind for reasons of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Andrew Marr , the UK ’ s head statistician Sir Ian Diamond said it was impossible to calculate a reliable league table because different nations counted coronavirus deaths so differently , and refused to say the UK was at the top of deaths in Europe .
He said : Modelling by The Times of excess deaths , however , suggests that as many as 55,700 people may have died because of the Chinese pandemic .
Italy previously had the highest number of deaths in Europe , with Spain at one point having the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ continent .
While Italy has begun to loosen her lockdown measures , the end to the UK ’ s looks to be some distance off .
Even with Prime Minister Boris Johnson set to outline the UK ’ s exit strategy on Sunday , government and independent scientists have indicated that lockdowns could be intermittent for possibly another year until a vaccine for the novel Chinese COVID-19 is developed .
However , the scientific basis for the UK ’ s lockdown has been put under question after the resignation of Professor Neil Ferguson @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adviser and the architect of the enforced social distancing strategy , was caught breaking his own rules clandestinely meeting his married lover .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

NHS FAIL? UK Has Highest CV-19 Death Toll in Europe, 2nd Globally
Written by Victoria Friedman
The United Kingdom now has the highest recorded coronavirus death toll in Europe, surpassing virus hotspot Italy, and second globally only to the United States of America.
Latest data collated by Johns Hopkins University puts the UK at 29,501 deaths, ahead of Italy’s 29,351 deaths, with the U.S. having the highest number of fatalities at 71,078 as of Wednesday, May 6th.
However, the UK’s official statistics body, the Office for National Statistics (ONS), puts coronavirus deaths in England and Wales as of May 2nd at 29,710.
The ONS bases this figure on the cause of death listed as coronavirus on death certificates, even if there is no confirmatory test, but doctors determine that it was likely the Chinese virus.
Different parts of the nation collect statistics at different periods, with Northern Ireland registering 393 deaths to April 29th and Scotland counting 2,272 up to April 26th, a total of 32,375 across the UK as of Wednesday, according to The Times.
That is almost half of the United States’s official death toll, with the UK only having one-fifth of America’s population, and despite the UK’s strict lockdown measures.
During the Downing Street press conference on Tuesday night, First Secretary of State Dominic Raab said of the 693 new deaths on the previous day:
“I don’t think we’ll get a real verdict on how well countries have done until the pandemic is over, and in particular until we’ve got comprehensive international data on all cause mortality.”
The head of Britain’s Office for National Statistics has praised the work of his colleagues, clearly pointing to a potential differential between the British figures and others around the world down to the quality of research and counting efficiency, implying other nations numbers may lag behind for reasons of accounting.
Speaking to BBC political journalist Andrew Marr, the UK’s head statistician Sir Ian Diamond said it was impossible to calculate a reliable league table because different nations counted coronavirus deaths so differently, and refused to say the UK was at the top of deaths in Europe. He said:
“making international comparisons is an unbelievably difficult thing to do. We in this country, in my opinion — and I would say this, wouldn’t I — we have the best reporting, the most transparent reporting, and the most timely reporting.”
Modelling by The Times of excess deaths, however, suggests that as many as 55,700 people may have died because of the Chinese pandemic.
Italy previously had the highest number of deaths in Europe, with Spain at one point having the highest number of confirmed cases in the continent. While Italy has begun to loosen her lockdown measures, the end to the UK’s looks to be some distance off.
Even with Prime Minister Boris Johnson set to outline the UK’s exit strategy on Sunday, government and independent scientists have indicated that lockdowns could be intermittent for possibly another year until a vaccine for the novel Chinese COVID-19 is developed.
However, the scientific basis for the UK’s lockdown has been put under question after the resignation of Professor Neil Ferguson, the government’s senior scientific adviser and the architect of the enforced social distancing strategy, was caught breaking his own rules clandestinely meeting his married lover.
Read more at www.breitbart.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-06--COVER UP: Fauci Approved HCQ ‘Trump Cure’ 15 Years Ago for Coronaviruses

Dr. Anthony Fauci , whose “ expert ” advice to President Trump has resulted in the complete shutdown of the greatest economic engine in world history , has known since 2005 that chloroquine is an effective inhibitor of coronaviruses .
How did he know this ?
Because of research done by the National Institutes of Health , of which he is the director .
In connection with the SARS outbreak – caused by a coronavirus dubbed SARS- CoV – the NIH researched chloroquine and concluded that it was effective at stopping the SARS coronavirus in its tracks .
The COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ SARS-CoV-2 .
While not exactly the same virus as SARS-CoV-1 , it is genetically related to it , and shares 79 % of its genome , as the name SARS-CoV-2 implies .
They both use the same host cell receptor , which is what viruses use to gain entry to the cell and infect the victim .
The Virology Journal – the official publication of Dr. Fauci ’ s National Institutes of Health – published what is now a blockbuster article on August 22 , 2005 , under the heading – get ready @ @ @ @ @ @ @ course , that Dr. Fauci ( pictured top ) has known for 15 years that chloroquine and it ’ s even milder derivative hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) will not only treat a current case of coronavirus ( “ therapeutic ” ) but prevent future cases ( “ prophylactic ” ) .
So HCQ functions as both a cure and a vaccine .
In other words , it ’ s a wonder drug for coronavirus .
Said Dr. Fauci ’ s NIH in 2005 : Dr. Didier Raoult , the Anthony Fauci of France @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to treat victims of SARS-CoV-2 that he said way back on February 25 that “ it ’ s game over ” for coronavirus .
He and a team of researchers reported that the use of HCQ administered with both azithromycin and zinc cured 79 of 80 patients with only “ rare and minor ” adverse events .
The highly-publicized VA study that purported to show HCQ was ineffective showed nothing of the sort .
HCQ wasn ’ t administered until the patients were virtually on their deathbeds when research indicates it should be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Plus , HCQ was administered without azithromycin and zinc , which form the cocktail that makes it supremely effective .
At-risk individuals need to receive the HCQ cocktail at the first sign of symptoms .
But Governor Andrew Cuomo banned the use of HCQ in the entire state of New York on March 6 , the Democrat governors of Nevada and Michigan soon followed suit , and by March 28 the whole country was under incarceration-in-place fatwas .
Nothing happened with regard to the use of HCQ in the U.S. until March @ @ @ @ @ @ @ foot down and insisted that the FDA consider authorizing HCQ for off-label use to treat SARS-CoV-2 .
On March 23 , Dr. Vladimir Zelenko reported that he had treated around 500 coronavirus patients with HCQ and had seen an astonishing 100 % success rate .
That ’ s not the “ anecdotal ” evidence Dr. Fauci sneers at , but actual results with real patients in clinical settings .
“ Since last Thursday , my team has treated approximately 350 patients in Kiryas Joel and another 150 patients in other areas of New @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this group and the information provided to me by affiliated medical teams , we have had ZERO deaths , ZERO hospitalizations , and ZERO intubations .
In addition , I have not heard of any negative side effects other than approximately 10 % of patients with temporary nausea and diarrhea.
” “ If you scale this nationally , the economy will rebound much quicker .
The country will open again .
And let me tell you a very important point .
This treatment costs about $ 20 .
That ’ s very important @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If every treatment costs $ 20,000 , that ’ s not so good .
All I ’ m doing is repurposing old , available drugs which we know their safety profiles , and using them in a unique combination in an outpatient setting.
” The questions are disturbing to a spectacular degree .
If Dr. Fauci has known since 2005 of the effectiveness of HCQ , why hasn ’ t it been administered immediately after people show symptoms , as Dr. Zelenko has done ?
Maybe then nobody would have died and nobody @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the sick , which is who a quarantine is for in the first place .
To paraphrase Jesus , it ’ s not the symptom-free who need HCQ but the sick .
And they need it at the first sign of symptoms .
While the regressive health care establishment wants the HCQ cocktail to only be administered late in the course of the infection , from a medical standpoint , this is stupid .
So why has Dr. Fauci minimized and dismissed HCQ at every turn instead of pushing this thing from jump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ launch clinical trials of HCQ until April 9 , by which time 33,000 people had died .
READ MORE :

COVER UP: Fauci Approved HCQ ‘Trump Cure’ 15 Years Ago for Coronaviruses
Written by truepundit.com
Dr. Anthony Fauci, whose “expert” advice to President Trump has resulted in the complete shutdown of the greatest economic engine in world history, has known since 2005 that chloroquine is an effective inhibitor of coronaviruses.
How did he know this? Because of research done by the National Institutes of Health, of which he is the director. In connection with the SARS outbreak – caused by a coronavirus dubbed SARS- CoV – the NIH researched chloroquine and concluded that it was effective at stopping the SARS coronavirus in its tracks.
The COVID-19 bug is likewise a coronavirus, labeled SARS-CoV-2. While not exactly the same virus as SARS-CoV-1, it is genetically related to it, and shares 79{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of its genome, as the name SARS-CoV-2 implies. They both use the same host cell receptor, which is what viruses use to gain entry to the cell and infect the victim.
The Virology Journal – the official publication of Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Health – published what is now a blockbuster article on August 22, 2005, under the heading – get ready for this –
“Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” (Emphasis mine throughout.) Write the researchers, “We report…that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.”
—Dr. Anthony Fauci
This means, of course, that Dr. Fauci (pictured top) has known for 15 years that chloroquine and it’s even milder derivative hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) will not only treat a current case of coronavirus (“therapeutic”) but prevent future cases (“prophylactic”).
So HCQ functions as both a cure and a vaccine.
In other words, it’s a wonder drug for coronavirus. Said Dr. Fauci’s NIH in 2005:
“concentrations of 10 μM completely abolished SARS-CoV infection.” Fauci’s researchers add, “chloroquine can effectively reduce the establishment of infection and spread of SARS-CoV.”
Dr. Didier Raoult, the Anthony Fauci of France, had such spectacular success using HCQ to treat victims of SARS-CoV-2 that he said way back on February 25 that “it’s game over” for coronavirus.
He and a team of researchers reported that the use of HCQ administered with both azithromycin and zinc cured 79 of 80 patients with only “rare and minor” adverse events.
“In conclusion,” these researchers write, “we confirm the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine associated with azithromycin in the treatment of COVID-19 and its potential effectiveness in the early impairment of contagiousness.”
The highly-publicized VA study that purported to show HCQ was ineffective showed nothing of the sort. HCQ wasn’t administered until the patients were virtually on their deathbeds when research indicates it should be prescribed as soon as symptoms are apparent.
Plus, HCQ was administered without azithromycin and zinc, which form the cocktail that makes it supremely effective. At-risk individuals need to receive the HCQ cocktail at the first sign of symptoms.
But Governor Andrew Cuomo banned the use of HCQ in the entire state of New York on March 6, the Democrat governors of Nevada and Michigan soon followed suit, and by March 28 the whole country was under incarceration-in-place fatwas.
Nothing happened with regard to the use of HCQ in the U.S. until March 20, when President Trump put his foot down and insisted that the FDA consider authorizing HCQ for off-label use to treat SARS-CoV-2.
On March 23, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko reported that he had treated around 500 coronavirus patients with HCQ and had seen an astonishing 100{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} success rate. That’s not the “anecdotal” evidence Dr. Fauci sneers at, but actual results with real patients in clinical settings.
“Since last Thursday, my team has treated approximately 350 patients in Kiryas Joel and another 150 patients in other areas of New York with the above regimen. Of this group and the information provided to me by affiliated medical teams, we have had ZERO deaths, ZERO hospitalizations, and ZERO intubations. In addition, I have not heard of any negative side effects other than approximately 10{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of patients with temporary nausea and diarrhea.” “If you scale this nationally, the economy will rebound much quicker. The country will open again. And let me tell you a very important point. This treatment costs about $20. That’s very important because you can scale that nationally. If every treatment costs $20,000, that’s not so good. All I’m doing is repurposing old, available drugs which we know their safety profiles, and using them in a unique combination in an outpatient setting.” — Dr. Zelenko
The questions are disturbing to a spectacular degree. If Dr. Fauci has known since 2005 of the effectiveness of HCQ, why hasn’t it been administered immediately after people show symptoms, as Dr. Zelenko has done?
Maybe then nobody would have died and nobody would have been incarcerated in place except the sick, which is who a quarantine is for in the first place. To paraphrase Jesus, it’s not the symptom-free who need HCQ but the sick. And they need it at the first sign of symptoms.
While the regressive health care establishment wants the HCQ cocktail to only be administered late in the course of the infection, from a medical standpoint, this is stupid.
Said one doctor:
“As a physician, this baffles me. I can’t think of a single infectious condition — bacterial, fungal, or viral — where the best medical treatment is to delay the use of an anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, or anti-viral until the infection is far advanced.”
So why has Dr. Fauci minimized and dismissed HCQ at every turn instead of pushing this thing from jump street? He didn’t even launch clinical trials of HCQ until April 9, by which time 33,000 people had died. READ MORE:
Read more at truepundit.com
***** PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related