principiascientificinternational--2020-05-17--Germans Stage Huge Anti-Lockdown Protests

The German Press is starting to wake up at last after a period of just saying Yes mam !
They have run the story that if we acted rationally , we could quickly overcome the consequences of the corona crisis .
But politics is deliberately spreading panic among the population and stirring up fear – and in this way causes a severe economic crisis .
For today , the initiative “ lateral thinking 711 ” announced a rally with 500,000 participants in Stuttgart have registered .
But there are protests rising in Munich and Berlin .
The number of people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is trying with the aid of most press to label these people as right-wing racists because they can not address their actions on false forecasts .
Meanwhile , unknown persons have set up a replica tombstone in front of Chancellor Angela Merkel ’ s ( CDU ) constituency office in Stralsund symbolizing her reign some call of Terror between the refugees and now the virus over-reaction has destroy their livelihoods and their future .
On top of that , the rising resentment against the Eurozone control from Brussels has many wanting to kill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
I have warned that the cultural divides are far too great and this virus is being used for a total environmental reconstruction of the economy by sheer force .
The lack of a transition or any planning whatsoever has cast the livelihoods and future of the world population is tremendous jeopardy and has drastically increased the outcome of our forecasts for not just the collapse of the Euro , but the rise in civil unrest and international war .
Trump has been advised that there is a tremendous risk rising of war @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government is reportedly working to replace all industrial supply chains from China .
This is a strategic move in light of rising tensions .
But this has already been implemented by the global ban on travel and movement of commerce thanks to the Coronavirus scare worldwide .
What Trump will be looking at is replacing those supply chains as they are closed at this moment .
This lockdown over the virus has destroyed the supply chains in so many areas because Gates and crew thought they could just destroy ‘ fossil fuels ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people make transitions for employment .
During the Great Depression , it was the Dust Bowl that destroyed agricultural jobs and created the Hobo Movement because people had no income .
This time it is Gates and he never considered what he was doing to society – only his Climate Change dream .
Even in the United States , we are witnessing rising civil unrest against UNCONSTITUTIONAL lockdowns .
This is going to rise as we head into November and the Democratic states , like California , think if they oppress the people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Germans Stage Huge Anti-Lockdown Protests
Written by Martin Armstrong
The German Press is starting to wake up at last after a period of just saying Yes mam! They have run the story that if we acted rationally, we could quickly overcome the consequences of the corona crisis. But politics is deliberately spreading panic among the population and stirring up fear – and in this way causes a severe economic crisis.
For today, the initiative “lateral thinking 711” announced a rally with 500,000 participants in Stuttgart have registered. But there are protests rising in Munich and Berlin. The number of people may reach 1 million.
The government is trying with the aid of most press to label these people as right-wing racists because they cannot address their actions on false forecasts. Meanwhile, unknown persons have set up a replica tombstone in front of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s (CDU) constituency office in Stralsund symbolizing her reign some call of Terror between the refugees and now the virus over-reaction has destroy their livelihoods and their future.
On top of that, the rising resentment against the Eurozone control from Brussels has many wanting to kill the Euro and return to national currencies. I have warned that the cultural divides are far too great and this virus is being used for a total environmental reconstruction of the economy by sheer force. The lack of a transition or any planning whatsoever has cast the livelihoods and future of the world population is tremendous jeopardy and has drastically increased the outcome of our forecasts for not just the collapse of the Euro, but the rise in civil unrest and international war.
Trump has been advised that there is a tremendous risk rising of war. According to sources, the U.S. government is reportedly working to replace all industrial supply chains from China. This is a strategic move in light of rising tensions. But this has already been implemented by the global ban on travel and movement of commerce thanks to the Coronavirus scare worldwide. What Trump will be looking at is replacing those supply chains as they are closed at this moment.
This lockdown over the virus has destroyed the supply chains in so many areas because Gates and crew thought they could just destroy ‘fossil fuels’ and rebuild without any consideration of how people make transitions for employment. During the Great Depression, it was the Dust Bowl that destroyed agricultural jobs and created the Hobo Movement because people had no income. This time it is Gates and he never considered what he was doing to society – only his Climate Change dream.
Even in the United States, we are witnessing rising civil unrest against UNCONSTITUTIONAL lockdowns. This is going to rise as we head into November and the Democratic states, like California, think if they oppress the people hard enough, they will blame Trump.
Read more at www.armstrongeconomics.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-19--More Doctors Speak Out AGAINST Face Masks

Ironically , as coronavirus deaths continue to decline in the US and as more states are “ opening up , @ @ @ @ @ an increase in mask wearing .
Are the face masks going to prevent the spread @ @ @ @ @ they protect people from the virus ?
Or may they actually cause harm to some @ @

Ironically, as coronavirus deaths continue to decline in the US and as more states are “opening up,” there appears to be an increase in mask wearing.
Are the face masks going to prevent the spread of the virus? Will they protect people from the virus? Or may they actually cause harm to some people?


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-19--COVID-19: Doctors Fear For Their Freedom Of Expression

COVID-19 : Doctors Fear For Their Freedom Of Expression The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed how scientific dissent is not only being suppressed and marginalized in Germany when it comes to climate science but with virology and public health .
The online German national daily Die Welt here writes , “ Virologists and physicians fear for their freedom of expression in the Corona crisis.
” Climate scientists are getting some company !
Citing the results of a recent survey , to Die Welt reports “ many experts believe that freedom of expression in science is under threat ” and “ virologists @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the measures taken by the German government.
” As the economy reels from the stringent restrictions enacted by authorities across Europe , the discussion about how to respond to the spread of the virus has become bitter .
Public health experts opposing the restrictions and lockdowns have found themselves marginalized and attacked by the media , other virologists , and most politicians .
Using a survey , “ Researchers at the University Hospital Eppendorf in Hamburg ( UKE ) , the Society for Virology ( GfV ) and the University of Tübingen have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” Die Welt reports .
“ 178 experts from the fields of virology , immunology , hygiene , internal medicine , and intensive care medicine ” were surveyed anonymously .
The results show that “ more than more than 70 percent of the participants support the distance rule of two meters and the prohibition of major events ” but that the other restrictions were “ far more controversial ” .
What ’ s surprising : “ One third even see freedom of expression in science as being threatened ” and today 63 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to restore public and economic life.
” Also : “ social distancing ” is apparently losing support , according to the survey .
Overall , the findings show that the pandemic skeptics are finally beginning to assert their views to the public .
Unfortunately , this is not even close to happening in climate science , wherein Germany the ultra-alarmists continue to control the message .
That freedom to express science is under threat , “ is probably what many climate scientists secretly think , ” Die kalte Sonne site here commented .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ change quickly once restrictions start eroding freedom and prosperity .
Read more at No Tricks Zone PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

COVID-19: Doctors Fear For Their Freedom Of Expression
Written by NoTricksZone
The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed how scientific dissent is not only being suppressed and marginalized in Germany when it comes to climate science but with virology and public health.
The online German national daily Die Welt here writes, “Virologists and physicians fear for their freedom of expression in the Corona crisis.” Climate scientists are getting some company!
Scientific freedom “under threat”
Citing the results of a recent survey, to Die Welt reports “many experts believe that freedom of expression in science is under threat” and “virologists have begun to change their attitude towards the measures taken by the German government.”
As the economy reels from the stringent restrictions enacted by authorities across Europe, the discussion about how to respond to the spread of the virus has become bitter.
Public health experts opposing the restrictions and lockdowns have found themselves marginalized and attacked by the media, other virologists, and most politicians.
Shift: COVID-19 alarmism waning, frustration growing
Using a survey, “Researchers at the University Hospital Eppendorf in Hamburg (UKE), the Society for Virology (GfV) and the University of Tübingen have tried to determine the mood among experts,” Die Welt reports.
“178 experts from the fields of virology, immunology, hygiene, internal medicine, and intensive care medicine” were surveyed anonymously.
The results show that “more than more than 70 percent of the participants support the distance rule of two meters and the prohibition of major events” but that the other restrictions were “far more controversial”.
One-third feel freedom in science is “being threatened”
What’s surprising: “One third even see freedom of expression in science as being threatened” and today 63 percent think “it would be sensible to restore public and economic life.”
Also: “social distancing” is apparently losing support, according to the survey.
Overall, the findings show that the pandemic skeptics are finally beginning to assert their views to the public.
Unfortunately, this is not even close to happening in climate science, wherein Germany the ultra-alarmists continue to control the message.
That freedom to express science is under threat, “is probably what many climate scientists secretly think,” Die kalte Sonne site here commented.
Perhaps COVID-19 tells us how moods can change quickly once restrictions start eroding freedom and prosperity.
h/t Rúnar O.
Read more at No Tricks Zone
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-19--FOIA Requests Expose ABC’s Climate Activism Down Under

As reported by Chris Kenny in The Australian today , over 300 pages of Freedom of Information documents obtained by free-market think tank the Institute of Public Affairs have exposed the motives behind the ABC ( Australian Broadcasting Corporation ) staff initiated ‘ Climate Crisis Advisory Group ’ , which put the ABC completely at odds with mainstream Australians .
Upon hearing about the initiative by ABC staff member Barbara Heggen , who sent an email to all staff proposing the initiative , many staff responded with glee at the flawed idea of “ solutions-based journalism ” for climate change @ @ @ @ @ @ @ demonstrate that the ABC is run by a staff collective .
After some of the emails were leaked to The Australian , ABC chairwomen Ita Buttrole ruled out the group .
She even said , “ The ABC leadership team and managing director ( David Anderson ) have thought otherwise.
” These FOI documents suggest the group is well and truly going , with meetings planned for as recently as January .
ABC News Director Craig McMurtrie suggests that there was a legitimate debate between staff that the ABC would follow The Guardian @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ABC admit “ tends towards more advocacy journalism ” .
The fact that the ABC would even consider following an activist form of journalism would not only be a breach of their charter but proves how completely out of touch ABC staff are .
The responses from ABC staff and endorsement of a biased form of reporting prove that they are completely at odds with mainstream Australians .
Some of the replies are rather amusing .
One staff member says , “ Sometimes when I ’ m on the late shift in Brisbane @ @ @ @ @ @ @ remotes to turn the TVs off .
They ’ re everywhere and no one is watching them , often during the day… Best to avoid hypocrisy where possible.
” Imagine being colleagues with the killjoy that goes around turning TVs off at the Brisbane studios .
Surely it ’ s the main job of staff at a news station to monitor what ’ s on their channel .
Many bemoan the lack of solar panels in the Melbourne Southbank studios .
One staff member states : “ There are so many other things @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t in this building… We should be encouraging the café on-site to charge much more for coffees in takeaway containers and a bigger discount for keep cups.
” “ A friend asked if it was possible to have a ‘ climate ’ tab on our news web site .
I would say the issue is as fundamental as politics and deserves its own tab .
I email [ blanked out ] but haven ’ t back .
I would also go so far as trying to lobby management to work internally at doing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Making our facilities as environmentally sustainable as possible .
In Hobart we have a large surface area of roofing , perfect for solar panels and water catchment , along with our car park area , collecting this water and storing it to irrigate the ridiculous amount of grass around the building… ” The FOI also reveals that ABC Director of News Gaven Morris was not pleased with the reply-all email chain full of replies to the entire organization which cheered on partisan news coverage .
He responded to a staff member who asks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the love of God… thank you.
” Many staff clearly do not seem pleased with Barbara Heggan ’ s climate activism , one replies with “ please stop hitting “ reply all ” and littering ppl ’ s inboxes with the stuff that is irrelevant to work .
Thanks.
” How can we expect the ABC to cover very serious policy discussions like the cost of climate policies impartially when so many staff hold an activist position on the topic ?
These FOI documents highlight that it is well and truly time for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ privatizing the ABC .
If ABC staff want to run a biased broadcaster , then Australian taxpayers shouldn ’ t be forced to fund it .
A poll released by the IPA recently found that only 32 percent of Australians believe the ABC represents the views of ordinary Australians , yet 100 percent of Australians are forced to fund it .
Despite the direction of the ABC ’ s chairwoman and managing director , the ABC appears to be completely run by a staff collective .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

FOIA Requests Expose ABC’s Climate Activism Down Under
Written by Evan Mulholland
As reported by Chris Kenny in The Australian today, over 300 pages of Freedom of Information documents obtained by free-market think tank the Institute of Public Affairs have exposed the motives behind the ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) staff initiated ‘Climate Crisis Advisory Group’, which put the ABC completely at odds with mainstream Australians.
Upon hearing about the initiative by ABC staff member Barbara Heggen, who sent an email to all staff proposing the initiative, many staff responded with glee at the flawed idea of “solutions-based journalism” for climate change reporting.
The responses well and truly demonstrate that the ABC is run by a staff collective.
After some of the emails were leaked to The Australian, ABC chairwomen Ita Buttrole ruled out the group. She even said, “The ABC leadership team and managing director (David Anderson) have thought otherwise.”
These FOI documents suggest the group is well and truly going, with meetings planned for as recently as January.
ABC News Director Craig McMurtrie suggests that there was a legitimate debate between staff that the ABC would follow The Guardian model of journalism, which even the ABC admit “tends towards more advocacy journalism”.
The fact that the ABC would even consider following an activist form of journalism would not only be a breach of their charter but proves how completely out of touch ABC staff are.
The responses from ABC staff and endorsement of a biased form of reporting prove that they are completely at odds with mainstream Australians.
Some of the replies are rather amusing. One staff member says, “Sometimes when I’m on the late shift in Brisbane I go around and try to find remotes to turn the TVs off. They’re everywhere and no one is watching them, often during the day… Best to avoid hypocrisy where possible.”
Imagine being colleagues with the killjoy that goes around turning TVs off at the Brisbane studios. Surely it’s the main job of staff at a news station to monitor what’s on their channel.
Many bemoan the lack of solar panels in the Melbourne Southbank studios.
One staff member states: “There are so many other things that should be happening but aren’t in this building… We should be encouraging the café on-site to charge much more for coffees in takeaway containers and a bigger discount for keep cups.”
One staff member replies with:
“A friend asked if it was possible to have a ‘climate’ tab on our news web site. I would say the issue is as fundamental as politics and deserves its own tab. I email [blanked out] but haven’t back. I would also go so far as trying to lobby management to work internally at doing our own bit even further!! Making our facilities as environmentally sustainable as possible. In Hobart we have a large surface area of roofing, perfect for solar panels and water catchment, along with our car park area, collecting this water and storing it to irrigate the ridiculous amount of grass around the building…”
The FOI also reveals that ABC Director of News Gaven Morris was not pleased with the reply-all email chain full of replies to the entire organization which cheered on partisan news coverage.
He responded to a staff member who asks staff not to reply-all with “For the love of God… thank you.”
Many staff clearly do not seem pleased with Barbara Heggan’s climate activism, one replies with “please stop hitting “reply all” and littering ppl’s inboxes with the stuff that is irrelevant to work. Thanks.”
How can we expect the ABC to cover very serious policy discussions like the cost of climate policies impartially when so many staff hold an activist position on the topic?
These FOI documents highlight that it is well and truly time for a serious and sober debate post-coronavirus on privatizing the ABC. If ABC staff want to run a biased broadcaster, then Australian taxpayers shouldn’t be forced to fund it.
A poll released by the IPA recently found that only 32 percent of Australians believe the ABC represents the views of ordinary Australians, yet 100 percent of Australians are forced to fund it.
Despite the direction of the ABC’s chairwoman and managing director, the ABC appears to be completely run by a staff collective.
Download the full FOI documents here.
Read more at Spectator
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-18--Donald Trump Admits Taking Hydroxychloroquine Treatment

President Donald Trump on Monday confirmed at the White House that he was taking hydroxychloroquine and zinc as preventatives against the coronavirus .
“ I happen to be taking it .
I ’ m taking it .
Hydroxychloroquine .
Right now , yeah , ” he said .
Trump said that he had been taking the medicine for about a week and a half .
“ I ’ m taking the two , the zinc and the hydroxy , and all I can tell you is , so far I seem to be ok , ” Trump said .
He @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had sent him positive letters about the effectiveness of the drug .
“ I ’ ve heard a lot of good stories and if it is not good , I will tell you right , ” he said .
“ I ’ m not going to get hurt by it.
” The president spoke to reporters about the drug on Monday afternoon at a White House roundtable with restaurant owners .
“ I ’ m still here , ” he said , saying that he had “ zero symptoms ” from the drug @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that he consulted with the White House doctor before taking it , who said it would be all right to take it if he wanted .
He said that he would not profit from any use of the drug , but wanted the country to know that it was fine to take .
“ I want the people of this nation to feel good , I don ’ t want them being sick and there ’ s a very good chance that this has an impact , especially early on , ” Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

Donald Trump Admits Taking Hydroxychloroquine Treatment
Written by Charlie Spiering
President Donald Trump on Monday confirmed at the White House that he was taking hydroxychloroquine and zinc as preventatives against the coronavirus.
“I happen to be taking it. I’m taking it. Hydroxychloroquine. Right now, yeah,” he said. Trump said that he had been taking the medicine for about a week and a half.
“I’m taking the two, the zinc and the hydroxy, and all I can tell you is, so far I seem to be ok,” Trump said.
He said that a doctor and many others had sent him positive letters about the effectiveness of the drug.
“I’ve heard a lot of good stories and if it is not good, I will tell you right,” he said. “I’m not going to get hurt by it.”
The president spoke to reporters about the drug on Monday afternoon at a White House roundtable with restaurant owners.
“I’m still here,” he said, saying that he had “zero symptoms” from the drug or the virus.
The president said that he consulted with the White House doctor before taking it, who said it would be all right to take it if he wanted.
He said that he would not profit from any use of the drug, but wanted the country to know that it was fine to take.
“I want the people of this nation to feel good, I don’t want them being sick and there’s a very good chance that this has an impact, especially early on,” Trump said.
Read the full story at: www.breitbart.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print


principiascientificinternational--2020-05-18--The Truth About the 1918 ‘Viral Influenza’ Pandemic

The Truth About the 1918 ‘ Viral Influenza ’ Pandemic It Started with the Rockefeller Institute ’ s Crude Bacterial Meningitis Vaccination Experiment on US Troops .
The 1918-19 bacterial vaccine experiment may have killed 50-100 million people .
“ During the war years 1918-19 , the US Army ballooned to 6,000,000 men , with 2,000,000 men being sent overseas .
The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research took advantage of this new pool of human guinea pigs to conduct vaccine experiments.
” “ During WW1 , the Rockefeller Institute also sent its experimental anti-meningococcal serum to England , France , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ helping spread the epidemic worldwide.
” “ The Rockefeller Institute and its experimental bacterial meningococcal vaccine , contrary to the accepted mythology may have killed 50-100 million people in 1918-1919.
” “ The crude anti-bacterial vaccine used in the Fort Riley experiment on soldiers was made in horses.
” “ According to a 2008 National Institute of Health paper , bacterial pneumonia was the killer in a minimum of 92.7 % of the 1918-19 Pandemic autopsies reviewed.
” “ Clean water , sanitation , flushing toilets , refrigerated foods and healthy diets have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ protect humanity from infectious diseases than any vaccine program.
” “ In 1918 , the vaccine industry experimented on soldiers…with disastrous results—but in 2018 , the vaccine industry experiments on infants every day .
The vaccine schedule has never been tested as it is given .
The results of the experiment are in : 1 in 7 of America ’ s fully vaccinated children is in some form of special education and over 50 % have some form of chronic illness.
” The “ Spanish Flu ” killed an estimated 50-100 million people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the story we have been told about this pandemic isn ’ t true ?
What if , instead , the killer infection was neither the flu nor Spanish in origin ?
Newly analyzed documents reveal that the “ Spanish Flu ” may have been a military vaccine experiment gone awry .
Summary The reason modern technology has not been able to pinpoint the killer influenza strain from this pandemic is because influenza was not the killer .
More soldiers died during WWI from disease than from bullets .
The pandemic was not flu @ @ @ @ @ @ @ higher ) of the deaths were caused by bacterial pneumonia , not an influenza virus .
The pandemic was not Spanish .
The first cases of bacterial pneumonia in 1918 trace back to military bases , the first one in Fort Riley , Kansas .
From January 21 – June 4 , 1918 , an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine cultured in horses by the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in New York was injected into soldiers at Fort Riley .
During the remainder of 1918 as those soldiers – often living and traveling @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Europe to fight , they spread bacteria at every stop between Kansas and the frontline trenches in France .
One study describes soldiers “ with active infections ( who ) were aerosolizing the bacteria that colonized their noses and throats , while others—often , in the same “ breathing spaces ” —were profoundly susceptible to invasion of and rapid spread through their lungs by their own or others ’ colonizing bacteria.
” ( 1 ) The “ Spanish Flu ” attacked healthy people in their prime .
Bacterial pneumonia attacks people in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , old and immunocompromised .
When WW1 ended on November 11 , 1918 , soldiers returned to their home countries and colonial outposts , spreading the killer bacterial pneumonia worldwide .
During WW1 , the Rockefeller Institute also sent its experimental anti-meningococcal serum to England , France , Belgium , Italy and other countries , helping spread the epidemic worldwide .
During the pandemic of 1918-19 , the so-called “ Spanish Flu ” killed 50-100 million people , including many soldiers .
Many people do not realize that disease killed far more soldiers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mustard gas or anything else typically associated with WWI .
I have a personal connection to the Spanish Flu .
Among those killed by disease in 1918-19 are members of both of my parents ’ families .
On my father ’ s side , his grandmother Sadie Hoyt died from pneumonia in 1918 .
Sadie was a Chief Yeoman in the Navy .
Her death left my grandmother Rosemary and her sister Anita to be raised by their aunt .
Sadie ’ s sister Marian also joined the Navy .
She died from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ On my mother ’ s side , two of her father ’ s sisters died in childhood .
All of the family members who died lived in New York City .
I suspect many American families , and many families worldwide , were impacted in similar ways by the mysterious Spanish Flu .
In 1918 , “ influenza ” or flu was a catchall term for disease of unknown origin .
It didn ’ t carry the specific meaning it does today .
It meant some mystery disease which dropped out of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the Medieval Latin “ influential ” in an astrological sense , meaning a visitation under the influence of the stars .
Why is What Happened 100 Years Ago Important Now ?
Between 1900-1920 , there were enormous efforts underway in the industrialized world to build a better society .
I will use New York as an example to discuss three major changes to society which occurred in NY during that time and their impact on mortality from infectious diseases .
1 .
Clean Water and Sanitation In the late 19th century through @ @ @ @ @ @ @ built an extraordinary system to bring clean water to the city from the Catskills , a system still in use today .
New York City also built over 6000 miles of sewer to take away and treat waste , which protects the drinking water .
The World Health Organization acknowledges the importance of clean water and sanitation in combating infectious diseases .
( 2 ) 2 .
Electricity In the late 19th century through the early 20th century , New York built a power grid and wired the city so power was available @ @ @ @ @ @ @ refrigeration .
Refrigeration is an unsung hero as a public health benefit .
When food is refrigerated from farm to table , the public is protected from potential infectious diseases .
Cheap renewable energy is important for many reasons , including combating infectious diseases .
3 .
Rockefeller ’ s Pharmaceutical Industry In the late 19th century through the early 20th century , New York became the home of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research ( now Rockefeller University ) .
The Institute is where the modern pharmaceutical industry was born .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pharmaceutical industry uses today , including the preparation of vaccine serums , for better or worse .
The vaccine used in the Fort Riley experiment on soldiers was made in horses .
US Mortality Rates data from the turn of the 20th century to 1965 clearly indicates that clean water , flushing toilets , effective sewer systems and refrigerated foods all combined to effectively reduce mortality from infectious diseases BEFORE vaccines for those diseases became available .
Have doctors and the pharmaceutical manufacturers taken credit for reducing mortality from infectious disease which rightfully @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and engineers ?
If hubris at the Rockefeller Institute in 1918 led to a pandemic disease which killed millions of people , what lessons can we learn and apply to 2018 ?
The Disease Was Not Spanish While watching an episode of American Experience on PBS a few months ago , I was surprised to hear that the first cases of “ Spanish Flu ” occurred at Fort Riley , Kansas in 1918 .
I thought , how is it possible this historically important event could be so badly misnamed 100 years ago @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” ?
Spain was one of a few countries not involved in World War I .
Most of the countries involved in the war censored their press .
Free from censorship concerns , the earliest press reports of people dying from disease in large numbers came from Spain .
The warring countries did not want to additionally frighten the troops , so they were content to scapegoat Spain .
Soldiers on all sides would be asked to cross no man ’ s land into machine gun fire , which was frightening enough without @ @ @ @ @ @ @ breeding ground .
One hundred years later , it ’ s long past time to drop “ Spanish ” from all discussion of this pandemic .
If the flu started at a United States military base in Kansas , then the disease could and should be more aptly named .
In order to prevent future disasters , the US ( and the rest of the world ) must take a hard look at what really caused the pandemic .
It is possible that one of the reasons the Spanish Flu has never been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ origin of the pandemic .
If the origin of the pandemic involved a vaccine experiment on US soldiers , then the US may prefer calling it Spanish Flu instead of The Fort Riley Bacteria of 1918 , or something similar .
The Spanish Flu started at the location this experimental bacterial vaccine was given making it the prime suspect as the source of the bacterial infections which killed so many .
It would be much more difficult to maintain the marketing mantra of “ vaccines save lives ” if a vaccine experiment originating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of primitive manufacturing caused the deaths of 50-100 million people .
“ The American Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research and its experimental bacterial meningococcal vaccine may have killed 50-100 million people in 1918-19 ” is a far less effective sales slogan than the overly simplistic ‘ vaccines save lives ’ .
” – Kevin Barry The Disease Which Killed so Many was not Flu nor was it a Virus .
It was Bacterial During the mid-2000 ’ s there was much talk about “ pandemic preparedness.
” Influenza vaccine manufacturers in the United @ @ @ @ @ @ @ develop vaccines to make sure that we don ’ t have another lethal pandemic “ flu , ” like the one in 1918-19 .
Capitalizing on the “ flu ” part of Spanish flu helped vaccine manufacturers procure billion-dollar checks from governments , even though scientists knew at the time that bacterial pneumonia was the real killer .
It is not my opinion that bacterial pneumonia was the real killer – thousands of autopsies confirm this fact .
According to a 2008 National Institute of Health paper , bacterial pneumonia was the killer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 1918-19 autopsies reviewed .
It is likely higher than 92.7 % .
The researchers looked at more than 9000 autopsies , and “ there were no negative ( bacterial ) lung culture results.
” “ … In the 68 higher-quality autopsy series , in which the possibility of unreported negative cultures could be excluded , 92.7 % of autopsy lung cultures were positive for ≥1 bacterium .
… in one study of approximately 9000 subjects who were followed from clinical presentation with influenza to resolution or autopsy , researchers obtained , with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or streptococci from 164 of 167 lung tissue samples .
“ There were 89 pure cultures of pneumococci ; 19 cultures from which only streptococci were recovered ; 34 that yielded mixtures of pneumococci and/or streptococci ; 22 that yielded a mixture of pneumococci , streptococci , and other organisms ( prominently pneumococci and nonhemolytic streptococci ) ; and 3 that yielded nonhemolytic streptococci alone .
There were no negative lung culture results.
” ( 3 ) Pneumococci or streptococci were found in “ 164 of ( the ) 167 lung tissue samples @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Bacteria was the killer .
Where Did the Spanish Flu Bacterial Pneumonia of 1918-19 Originate ?
When the United States declared war in April 1917 , the fledgling Pharmaceutical industry had something they had never had before – a large supply of human test subjects in the form of the US military ’ s first draft .
Pre-war in 1917 , the US Army was 286,000 men .
Post-war in 1920 , the US army disbanded , and had 296,000 men .
During the war years 1918-19 , the US Army ballooned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being sent overseas .
The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research took advantage of this new pool of human guinea pigs to conduct vaccine experiments .
A Report on Anti-meningitis Vaccination and Observations on Agglutinins in the Blood of Chronic Meningococcus Carriers as Recorded by Frederick L. Gates , MD in 1918 From the Base Hospital , Fort Riley , Kansas and The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research , New York .
Received July 20 , 1918 Between January 21st and June 4th of 1918 , Dr. Gates reports on an experiment where soldiers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ meningitis vaccine .
Those conducting the experiment on the soldiers were just spit-balling dosages of a vaccine serum made in horses .
The vaccination regime was designed to be 3 doses .
4,792 men received the first dose , but only 4,257 got the 2nd dose ( down 11 % ) , and only 3702 received all three doses ( down 22.7 % ) .
A total of 1,090 men were not there for the 3rd dose .
What happened to these soldiers ?
Were they shipped East by train from Kansas to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they in the Fort Riley hospital ?
Dr. Gates ’ report doesn ’ t tell us .
An article accompanying the American Experience broadcast I watched sheds some light on where these 1,090 men might be .
Gates began his experiments in January 1918 .
By March of that year , “ 100 men a day ” were entering the infirmary at Fort Riley .
Are some of these the men missing from Dr. Gates ’ report – the ones who did not get the 2nd or 3rd dose ?
“ … Shortly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the first domino would fall signaling the commencement of the first wave of the 1918 influenza .
“ Company cook Albert Gitchell reported to the camp infirmary with complaints of a “ bad cold.
” “ Right behind him came Corporal Lee W. Drake voicing similar complaints .
“ By noon , camp surgeon Edward R. Schreiner had over 100 sick men on his hands , all apparently suffering from the same malady… ” ( 5 ) Gates does report that several of the men in the experiment had flu-like symptoms : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the vaccine .
These symptoms are a disaster for men living in barracks , travelling on trains to the Atlantic coast , sailing to Europe , and living and fighting in trenches .
The unsanitary conditions at each step of the journey are an ideal environment for a contagious disease like bacterial pneumonia to spread .
From Dr. Gates ’ report : “ Several cases of looseness of the bowels or transient diarrhea were noted .
This symptom had not been encountered before .
Careful inquiry in individual cases often elicited the information @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of vaccination were suffering from mild coryza , bronchitis , etc.
, at the time of injection .
“ Sometimes the reaction was initiated by a chill or chilly sensation , and a number of men complained of fever or feverish sensations during the following night .
“ Next in frequency came nausea ( occasionally vomiting ) , dizziness , and general “ aches and pains ” in the joints and muscles , which in a few instances were especially localized in the neck or lumbar region , causing stiff neck or stiff @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by diarrhea .
“ The reactions , therefore , occasionally simulated the onset of epidemic meningitis and several vaccinated men were sent as suspects to the Base Hospital for diagnosis.
” ( 4 ) According to Gates , they injected random dosages of an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine into soldiers .
Afterwards , some of the soldiers had symptoms which “ simulated ” meningitis , but Dr. Gates advances the fantastical claim that it wasn ’ t actual meningitis .
The soldiers developed flu-like symptoms .
Bacterial meningitis , then and now , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( 6 ) Perhaps the similarity of early symptoms of bacterial meningitis and bacterial pneumonia to symptoms of flu is why the vaccine experiments at Fort Riley have been able to escape scrutiny as a potential cause of the Spanish Flu for 100 years and counting .
How did the “ Spanish Flu ” Spread so Widely and so Quickly ?
There is an element of a perfect storm in how the Gates bacteria spread .
WWI ended only 10 months after the first injections .
Unfortunately for the 50-100 million who died @ @ @ @ @ @ @ moved quickly during those 10 months .
An article from 2008 on the CDC ’ s website describes how sick WWI soldiers could pass along the bacteria to others by becoming “ cloud adults.
” “ Finally , for brief periods and to varying degrees , affected hosts became “ cloud adults ” who increased the aerosolization of colonizing strains of bacteria , particularly pneumococci , hemolytic streptococci , H. influenzae , and S. aureus .
“ For several days during local epidemics—particularly in crowded settings such as hospital wards , military camps @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and trenches ) —some persons were immunologically susceptible to , infected with , or recovering from infections with influenza virus .
“ Persons with active infections were aerosolizing the bacteria that colonized their noses and throats , while others—often , in the same “ breathing spaces ” —were profoundly susceptible to invasion of and rapid spread through their lungs by their own or others ’ colonizing bacteria.
” ( 1 ) Three times in his report on the Fort Riley vaccine experiment , Dr. Gates states that some soldiers had a “ severe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ susceptibility to the vaccine ” .
While the vaccine made many sick , it only killed those who were susceptible to it .
Those who became sick and survived became “ cloud adults ” who spread the bacteria to others , which created more cloud adults , spreading to others where it killed the susceptible , repeating the cycle until there were no longer wartime unsanitary conditions , and there were no longer millions of soldiers to experiment on .
The toll on US troops was enormous and it is well documented .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ influenza ” traveled like wildfire through the US military .
( substitute “ bacteria ” for Dr. Byerly ’ s “ influenza ” or “ virus ” ) : “ … Fourteen of the largest training camps had reported influenza outbreaks in March , April , or May , and some of the infected troops carried the virus with them aboard ships to France … “ As soldiers in the trenches became sick , the military evacuated them from the front lines and replaced them with healthy men .
“ This process continuously @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hosts—young , healthy soldiers in which it could adapt , reproduce , and become extremely virulent without danger of burning out .
“ … Before any travel ban could be imposed , a contingent of replacement troops departed Camp Devens ( outside of Boston ) for Camp Upton , Long Island , the Army ’ s debarkation point for France , and took influenza with them .
“ Medical officers at Upton said it arrived “ abruptly ” on September 13 , 1918 , with 38 hospital admissions , followed by 86 the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Hospital admissions peaked on October 4 with 483 , and within 40 days , Camp Upton sent 6,131 men to the hospital for influenza .
Some developed pneumonia so quickly that physicians diagnosed it simply by observing the patient rather than listening to the lungs… ” ( 7 ) “ The United States was not the only country in possession of the Rockefeller Institute ’ s experimental bacterial vaccine .
“ A 1919 report from the Institute states : “ Reference should be made that before the United States entered the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Institute had resumed the preparation of anti-meningococcic serum , in order to meet the requests of England , France , Belgium Italy and other countries.
” “ The same report states : “ In order to meet the suddenly increased demand for the curative serums worked out at the Institute , a special stable for horses was quickly erected … ” ( 8 ) An experimental anti-meningoccic serum made in horses and injected into soldiers who would be entering the cramped and unsanitary living conditions of war … what could possibly go wrong @ @ @ @ @ @ @ horses at the Rockefeller Institute which was injected into US soldiers and distributed to numerous other countries responsible for the 50-100 million people killed by bacterial lung infections in 1918-19 ?
The Institute says it distributed the bacterial serum to England , France , Belgium , Italy and other countries during WWI .
Not enough is known about how these countries experimented on their soldiers .
I hope independent researchers will take an honest look at these questions .
The Road to Hell is Paved with Good Intentions I do not believe that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trying to harm anyone .
Some will see the name Rockefeller and yell .
“ Illuminati !
” or “ culling the herd !
” I do not believe that ’ s what happened .
I believe standard medical hubris is responsible – doctors “ playing God ” , thinking they can tame nature without creating unanticipated problems .
With medical hubris , I do not think the situation has changed materially over the past 100 years .
What Now ?
The vaccine industry is always looking for human test subjects .
They @ @ @ @ @ @ @ able to find populations who not in a position to refuse .
Soldiers ( 9 ) , infants , the disabled , prisoners , those in developing nations – anyone not in a position to refuse .
Vaccine experimentation on vulnerable populations is not an issue of the past .
Watch this video clip of Dr. Stanley Plotkin where he describes using experimental vaccines on orphans , the mentally retarded , prisoners , and those under colonial rule .
The deposition was in January 2018 .
The hubris of the medical community is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was 100 years ago .
Watch as Dr. Plotkin admits to writing : “ The question is whether we are to have experiments performed on fully functioning adults and on children who are potentially contributors to society or to perform initial studies in children and adults who are human in form but not in social potential.
” Please watch the horrifying video clip of Dr. Stanley Plotkin testifying under oath about the experiments that the pharmaceutical industry has done on unaware , uninformed patients .
https : //youtu.be/yevV_slu7Dw ( 10 ) In part @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of medical hubris and well aware of the poor record of medical ethics , the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights developed international standards regarding the right to informed consent to preventative medical procedures like vaccination .
The international community is well aware that the pharmaceutical industry makes mistakes and is always on the lookout for human test subjects .
The Declaration states that individuals have the human right to consent to any preventative medical intervention like vaccination .
1 .
Human dignity , human rights and fundamental freedoms are to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and welfare of the individual should have priority over the sole interest of science or society .
Article 6 – Consent 1 .
Any preventive , diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior , free and informed consent of the person concerned , based on adequate information .
The consent should , where appropriate , be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice .
( 11 ) Clean water , sanitation , flushing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have done and still do far more to protect humanity from infectious diseases than any vaccine program .
Doctor and the vaccine industry have usurped credit which rightfully belongs to plumbers , electricians , sandhogs , engineers and city planners .
For these reasons , policy makers at all levels of government should protect the human rights and individual liberties of individuals to opt out of vaccine programs via exemptions .
The hubris of the medical community will never go away .
Policy makers need to know that vaccines like all medical interventions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ magic .
We all have different susceptibility to disease .
Human beings are not one size fits all .
In 1918-19 , the vaccine industry experimented on soldiers , likely with disastrous results .
In 2018 , the vaccine industry experiments on infants every day .
The vaccine schedule has never been tested as it is given .
The results of the experiment are in : 1 in 7 of America ’ s fully vaccinated children is in some form of special education and over 50 % have some form of chronic illness @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there was no safety follow up after vaccines were delivered .
In 2018 , there is virtually no safety follow up after a vaccine is delivered .
Who exactly gave you that flu shot at Rite Aid ?
Do you have their cell number of the store employee if something goes wrong ?
In 1918-19 , there was no liability to the manufacturer for injuries or death caused by vaccines .
In 2018 , there is no liability for vaccine manufacturers for injuries or death caused by vaccines , which was formalized in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , there was no independent investigative follow up challenging the official story that “ Spanish Flu ” was some mystery illness which dropped from the sky .
I suspect that many of those at the Rockefeller Institute knew what happened , and that many of the doctors who administered the vaccines to the troops knew what happened , but those people are long dead .
In 2018 , the Pharmaceutical industry is the largest campaign donor to politicians and the largest advertiser in all forms of media , so not much has changed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ likely be ignored by mainstream media because their salaries are paid by pharmaceutical advertising .
The next time you hear someone say “ vaccines save lives ” please remember that the true story of the cost/benefit of vaccines is much more complicated than their three-word slogan .
Also remember that vaccines may have killed 50-100 million people in 1918-19 .
If true , those costs greatly outweighed any benefit , especially considering that plumbers , electricians , sandhogs and engineers did , and continue to do , the real work which reduces mortality @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Human rights and bioethics are critically important .
Policy makers should understand the history of medical hubris and protect individual and parental human rights as described in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights .
—— Kevin Barry is the President of First Freedoms , Inc. a 501.c.3 .
He is a former federal attorney , a rep at the UN HQ in New York and the author of Vaccine Whistleblower : Exposing Autism Research Fraud at the CDC .
Please support our work at www.firstfreedoms.org References 1 .
Deaths from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ F. Brundage* and G. Dennis Shanks† Author affiliations : *Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center , Silver Spring , Maryland , USA ; †Australian Army Malaria Institute , Enoggera , Queensland , Australia https : //wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/arti cle/14/8/07-1313_article 2 .
World Health Organization : Unsafe drinking water , sanitation and waste management http : //www.who.int/sustainable -development/cities/health- risks/water-sanitation/en/ 3 .
J Infect Dis .
2008 Oct 1 ; 198 ( 7 ) : 962–970 .
Predominant Role of Bacterial Pneumonia as a Cause of Death in Pandemic Influenza : Implications for Pandemic Influenza Preparedness David M. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Anthony S. Fauci https : //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p mc/articles/PMC2599911/ 4 .
PDF of Fort Riley Study ( 1918 ) https : //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p mc/articles/PMC2126288/pdf/449 .pdf 5 .
American Experience , “ The First Wave ” , PBS https : //www.pbs.org/wgbh/ameri canexperience/features/influen za-first-wave/ 6 .
Mayo Clinic : Meningitis www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-co nditions/meningitis/symptoms- causes/syc-20350508 7 .
Public Health Rep. 2010 ; 125 ( Suppl 3 ) : 82–91 .
The U.S. Military and the Influenza Pandemic of 1918–1919 Carol R. Byerly , PhD https : //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p mc/articles/PMC2862337/ 8 .
Rockefeller Institute pamphlet PDF ( 1919 ) https : //digitalcommons.rockefe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 9 .
Is Military Research Hazardous to Veterans ’ Health ?
Lessons Spanning Half a Century , A Staff Report Prepared for the Committee on Veterans ’ Affairs , United States Senate , December 1994 https : //www.hsdl.org/ ?
abstract & did=438835 10 .
Dr. Stanley Plotkin : vaccine experiments on orphans , the mentally retarded , and others ( January 2018 ) https : //youtu.be/yevV_slu7Dw 11 .
Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights ( 19 October 2005 ) http : //portal.unesco.org/en/ev .php-URL_ID=31058 & URL_DO=DO_TO PIC & URL_SECTION=201.html 12 .
CDC Offers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ //www.disabilityscoop.co m/2016/03/14/cdc-disability-pr evalence/22034/ 13 .
1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act https : //worldmercuryproject.or g/news/childhood-vaccine-injur y-act-protect/ About the author : Dr. Gary G. Kohls is a medical doctor working for most of his career as a rural , full-service family practice physician .
In 1984 he was awarded a Bush Foundation Medical Fellowship .
In the early 1990s Dr. Kohls worked at a Regional Treatment Center as a physician for psychiatric inpatients and later worked at a psychological services clinic .
Now retired , he continues to present lectures and seminars to healthcare professionals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as editing the popular e-newsletter Preventive Psychiatry E-Newsletter ( PPEN ) .
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL , legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes .
Head Office : 27 Old Gloucester Street , London WC1N 3AX .
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method .

The Truth About the 1918 ‘Viral Influenza’ Pandemic
Written by Gary G. Kohls, MD
It Started with the Rockefeller Institute’s Crude Bacterial Meningitis Vaccination Experiment on US Troops. The 1918-19 bacterial vaccine experiment may have killed 50-100 million people.
“During the war years 1918-19, the US Army ballooned to 6,000,000 men, with 2,000,000 men being sent overseas. The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research took advantage of this new pool of human guinea pigs to conduct vaccine experiments.” “During WW1, the Rockefeller Institute also sent its experimental anti-meningococcal serum to England, France, Belgium, Italy and other countries, helping spread the epidemic worldwide.” “The Rockefeller Institute and its experimental bacterial meningococcal vaccine, contrary to the accepted mythology may have killed 50-100 million people in 1918-1919.” “The crude anti-bacterial vaccine used in the Fort Riley experiment on soldiers was made in horses.” “According to a 2008 National Institute of Health paper, bacterial pneumonia was the killer in a minimum of 92.7{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of the 1918-19 Pandemic autopsies reviewed.” “Clean water, sanitation, flushing toilets, refrigerated foods and healthy diets have done and still do far more to protect humanity from infectious diseases than any vaccine program.” “In 1918, the vaccine industry experimented on soldiers…with disastrous results—but in 2018, the vaccine industry experiments on infants every day. The vaccine schedule has never been tested as it is given. The results of the experiment are in: 1 in 7 of America’s fully vaccinated children is in some form of special education and over 50{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} have some form of chronic illness.”The “Spanish Flu” killed an estimated 50-100 million people during a pandemic 1918-19.”
What if the story we have been told about this pandemic isn’t true? What if, instead, the killer infection was neither the flu nor Spanish in origin?
Newly analyzed documents reveal that the “Spanish Flu” may have been a military vaccine experiment gone awry.
Summary
The reason modern technology has not been able to pinpoint the killer influenza strain from this pandemic is because influenza was not the killer.
More soldiers died during WWI from disease than from bullets.
The pandemic was not flu. An estimated 95{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} (or higher) of the deaths were caused by bacterial pneumonia, not an influenza virus.
The pandemic was not Spanish. The first cases of bacterial pneumonia in 1918 trace back to military bases, the first one in Fort Riley, Kansas.
From January 21 – June 4, 1918, an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine cultured in horses by the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in New York was injected into soldiers at Fort Riley.
During the remainder of 1918 as those soldiers – often living and traveling under poor sanitary conditions – were sent to Europe to fight, they spread bacteria at every stop between Kansas and the frontline trenches in France.
One study describes soldiers “with active infections (who) were aerosolizing the bacteria that colonized their noses and throats, while others—often, in the same “breathing spaces”—were profoundly susceptible to invasion of and rapid spread through their lungs by their own or others’ colonizing bacteria.” (1)
The “Spanish Flu” attacked healthy people in their prime. Bacterial pneumonia attacks people in their prime. Flu attacks the young, old and immunocompromised.
When WW1 ended on November 11, 1918, soldiers returned to their home countries and colonial outposts, spreading the killer bacterial pneumonia worldwide.
During WW1, the Rockefeller Institute also sent its experimental anti-meningococcal serum to England, France, Belgium, Italy and other countries, helping spread the epidemic worldwide.
During the pandemic of 1918-19, the so-called “Spanish Flu” killed 50-100 million people, including many soldiers.
Many people do not realize that disease killed far more soldiers on all sides than machine guns or mustard gas or anything else typically associated with WWI.
I have a personal connection to the Spanish Flu. Among those killed by disease in 1918-19 are members of both of my parents’ families.
On my father’s side, his grandmother Sadie Hoyt died from pneumonia in 1918. Sadie was a Chief Yeoman in the Navy. Her death left my grandmother Rosemary and her sister Anita to be raised by their aunt. Sadie’s sister Marian also joined the Navy. She died from “the influenza” in 1919.
On my mother’s side, two of her father’s sisters died in childhood. All of the family members who died lived in New York City.
I suspect many American families, and many families worldwide, were impacted in similar ways by the mysterious Spanish Flu.
In 1918, “influenza” or flu was a catchall term for disease of unknown origin. It didn’t carry the specific meaning it does today.
It meant some mystery disease which dropped out of the sky. In fact, influenza is from the Medieval Latin “influential” in an astrological sense, meaning a visitation under the influence of the stars.
Why is What Happened 100 Years Ago Important Now?
Between 1900-1920, there were enormous efforts underway in the industrialized world to build a better society. I will use New York as an example to discuss three major changes to society which occurred in NY during that time and their impact on mortality from infectious diseases.
1. Clean Water and Sanitation
In the late 19th century through the early 20th century, New York built an extraordinary system to bring clean water to the city from the Catskills, a system still in use today. New York City also built over 6000 miles of sewer to take away and treat waste, which protects the drinking water. The World Health Organization acknowledges the importance of clean water and sanitation in combating infectious diseases. (2)
2. Electricity
In the late 19th century through the early 20th century, New York built a power grid and wired the city so power was available in every home. Electricity allows for refrigeration. Refrigeration is an unsung hero as a public health benefit. When food is refrigerated from farm to table, the public is protected from potential infectious diseases. Cheap renewable energy is important for many reasons, including combating infectious diseases.
3. Rockefeller’s Pharmaceutical Industry
In the late 19th century through the early 20th century, New York became the home of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research (now Rockefeller University). The Institute is where the modern pharmaceutical industry was born. The Institute pioneered many of the approaches the pharmaceutical industry uses today, including the preparation of vaccine serums, for better or worse. The vaccine used in the Fort Riley experiment on soldiers was made in horses.
US Mortality Rates data from the turn of the 20th century to 1965 clearly indicates that clean water, flushing toilets, effective sewer systems and refrigerated foods all combined to effectively reduce mortality from infectious diseases BEFORE vaccines for those diseases became available.
Have doctors and the pharmaceutical manufacturers taken credit for reducing mortality from infectious disease which rightfully belongs to sandhogs, plumbers, electricians and engineers?
If hubris at the Rockefeller Institute in 1918 led to a pandemic disease which killed millions of people, what lessons can we learn and apply to 2018?
The Disease Was Not Spanish
While watching an episode of American Experience on PBS a few months ago, I was surprised to hear that the first cases of “Spanish Flu” occurred at Fort Riley, Kansas in 1918. I thought, how is it possible this historically important event could be so badly misnamed 100 years ago and never corrected?
Why “Spanish”?
Spain was one of a few countries not involved in World War I. Most of the countries involved in the war censored their press.
Free from censorship concerns, the earliest press reports of people dying from disease in large numbers came from Spain. The warring countries did not want to additionally frighten the troops, so they were content to scapegoat Spain. Soldiers on all sides would be asked to cross no man’s land into machine gun fire, which was frightening enough without knowing that the trenches were a disease breeding ground.
One hundred years later, it’s long past time to drop “Spanish” from all discussion of this pandemic. If the flu started at a United States military base in Kansas, then the disease could and should be more aptly named.
In order to prevent future disasters, the US (and the rest of the world) must take a hard look at what really caused the pandemic.
It is possible that one of the reasons the Spanish Flu has never been corrected is that it helps disguise the origin of the pandemic.
If the origin of the pandemic involved a vaccine experiment on US soldiers, then the US may prefer calling it Spanish Flu instead of The Fort Riley Bacteria of 1918, or something similar. The Spanish Flu started at the location this experimental bacterial vaccine was given making it the prime suspect as the source of the bacterial infections which killed so many.
It would be much more difficult to maintain the marketing mantra of “vaccines save lives” if a vaccine experiment originating in the United States during the years of primitive manufacturing caused the deaths of 50-100 million people.
“The American Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research and its experimental bacterial meningococcal vaccine may have killed 50-100 million people in 1918-19” is a far less effective sales slogan than the overly simplistic ‘vaccines save lives’.” – Kevin Barry
The Disease Which Killed so Many was not Flu nor was it a Virus. It was Bacterial
During the mid-2000’s there was much talk about “pandemic preparedness.” Influenza vaccine manufacturers in the United States received billions of taxpayer dollars to develop vaccines to make sure that we don’t have another lethal pandemic “flu,” like the one in 1918-19.
Capitalizing on the “flu” part of Spanish flu helped vaccine manufacturers procure billion-dollar checks from governments, even though scientists knew at the time that bacterial pneumonia was the real killer.
It is not my opinion that bacterial pneumonia was the real killer – thousands of autopsies confirm this fact.
According to a 2008 National Institute of Health paper, bacterial pneumonia was the killer in a minimum of 92.7{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of the 1918-19 autopsies reviewed. It is likely higher than 92.7{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}.
The researchers looked at more than 9000 autopsies, and “there were no negative (bacterial) lung culture results.”
“… In the 68 higher-quality autopsy series, in which the possibility of unreported negative cultures could be excluded, 92.7{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of autopsy lung cultures were positive for ≥1 bacterium. … in one study of approximately 9000 subjects who were followed from clinical presentation with influenza to resolution or autopsy, researchers obtained, with sterile technique, cultures of either pneumococci or streptococci from 164 of 167 lung tissue samples.
“There were 89 pure cultures of pneumococci; 19 cultures from which only streptococci were recovered; 34 that yielded mixtures of pneumococci and/or streptococci; 22 that yielded a mixture of pneumococci, streptococci, and other organisms (prominently pneumococci and nonhemolytic streptococci); and 3 that yielded nonhemolytic streptococci alone. There were no negative lung culture results.” (3)
Pneumococci or streptococci were found in “164 of (the) 167 lung tissue samples” autopsied. That is 98.2{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}. Bacteria was the killer.
Where Did the Spanish Flu Bacterial Pneumonia of 1918-19 Originate?
When the United States declared war in April 1917, the fledgling Pharmaceutical industry had something they had never had before – a large supply of human test subjects in the form of the US military’s first draft.
Pre-war in 1917, the US Army was 286,000 men. Post-war in 1920, the US army disbanded, and had 296,000 men.
During the war years 1918-19, the US Army ballooned to 6,000,000 men, with 2,000,000 men being sent overseas. The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research took advantage of this new pool of human guinea pigs to conduct vaccine experiments.
A Report on Anti-meningitis Vaccination and Observations on Agglutinins in the Blood of Chronic Meningococcus Carriers as Recorded by Frederick L. Gates, MD in 1918
From the Base Hospital, Fort Riley, Kansas and The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, New York. Received July 20, 1918
(Author note: Please read the Fort Riley paper in its entirety so you can appreciate the carelessness of the experiments conducted on these troops.)
Between January 21st and June 4th of 1918, Dr. Gates reports on an experiment where soldiers were given 3 doses of a bacterial meningitis vaccine. Those conducting the experiment on the soldiers were just spit-balling dosages of a vaccine serum made in horses.
The vaccination regime was designed to be 3 doses.
4,792 men received the first dose, but only 4,257 got the 2nd dose (down 11{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}), and only 3702 received all three doses (down 22.7{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}).
A total of 1,090 men were not there for the 3rd dose. What happened to these soldiers? Were they shipped East by train from Kansas to board a ship to Europe? Were they in the Fort Riley hospital? Dr. Gates’ report doesn’t tell us.
An article accompanying the American Experience broadcast I watched sheds some light on where these 1,090 men might be. Gates began his experiments in January 1918.
By March of that year, “100 men a day” were entering the infirmary at Fort Riley.
Are some of these the men missing from Dr. Gates’ report – the ones who did not get the 2nd or 3rd dose?
“… Shortly before breakfast on Monday, March 11, the first domino would fall signaling the commencement of the first wave of the 1918 influenza.
“Company cook Albert Gitchell reported to the camp infirmary with complaints of a “bad cold.”
“Right behind him came Corporal Lee W. Drake voicing similar complaints.
“By noon, camp surgeon Edward R. Schreiner had over 100 sick men on his hands, all apparently suffering from the same malady…” (5)
Gates does report that several of the men in the experiment had flu-like symptoms: coughs, vomiting and diarrhea after receiving the vaccine.
These symptoms are a disaster for men living in barracks, travelling on trains to the Atlantic coast, sailing to Europe, and living and fighting in trenches.
The unsanitary conditions at each step of the journey are an ideal environment for a contagious disease like bacterial pneumonia to spread.
From Dr. Gates’ report:
“Several cases of looseness of the bowels or transient diarrhea were noted. This symptom had not been encountered before. Careful inquiry in individual cases often elicited the information that men who complained of the effects of vaccination were suffering from mild coryza, bronchitis, etc., at the time of injection.
“Sometimes the reaction was initiated by a chill or chilly sensation, and a number of men complained of fever or feverish sensations during the following night.
“Next in frequency came nausea (occasionally vomiting), dizziness, and general “aches and pains” in the joints and muscles, which in a few instances were especially localized in the neck or lumbar region, causing stiff neck or stiff back. A few injections were followed by diarrhea.
“The reactions, therefore, occasionally simulated the onset of epidemic meningitis and several vaccinated men were sent as suspects to the Base Hospital for diagnosis.” (4)
According to Gates, they injected random dosages of an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine into soldiers. Afterwards, some of the soldiers had symptoms which “simulated” meningitis, but Dr. Gates advances the fantastical claim that it wasn’t actual meningitis.
The soldiers developed flu-like symptoms. Bacterial meningitis, then and now, is known to mimic flu-like symptoms. (6)
Perhaps the similarity of early symptoms of bacterial meningitis and bacterial pneumonia to symptoms of flu is why the vaccine experiments at Fort Riley have been able to escape scrutiny as a potential cause of the Spanish Flu for 100 years and counting.
How did the “Spanish Flu” Spread so Widely and so Quickly?
There is an element of a perfect storm in how the Gates bacteria spread. WWI ended only 10 months after the first injections. Unfortunately for the 50-100 million who died, those soldiers injected with horse-infused bacteria moved quickly during those 10 months.
An article from 2008 on the CDC’s website describes how sick WWI soldiers could pass along the bacteria to others by becoming “cloud adults.”
“Finally, for brief periods and to varying degrees, affected hosts became “cloud adults” who increased the aerosolization of colonizing strains of bacteria, particularly pneumococci, hemolytic streptococci, H. influenzae, and S. aureus.
“For several days during local epidemics—particularly in crowded settings such as hospital wards, military camps, troop ships, and mines (and trenches)—some persons were immunologically susceptible to, infected with, or recovering from infections with influenza virus.
“Persons with active infections were aerosolizing the bacteria that colonized their noses and throats, while others—often, in the same “breathing spaces”—were profoundly susceptible to invasion of and rapid spread through their lungs by their own or others’ colonizing bacteria.” (1)
Three times in his report on the Fort Riley vaccine experiment, Dr. Gates states that some soldiers had a “severe reaction” indicating “an unusual individual susceptibility to the vaccine”.
While the vaccine made many sick, it only killed those who were susceptible to it. Those who became sick and survived became “cloud adults” who spread the bacteria to others, which created more cloud adults, spreading to others where it killed the susceptible, repeating the cycle until there were no longer wartime unsanitary conditions, and there were no longer millions of soldiers to experiment on.
The toll on US troops was enormous and it is well documented. Dr. Carol Byerly describes how the “influenza” traveled like wildfire through the US military. (substitute “bacteria” for Dr. Byerly’s “influenza” or “virus”):
“… Fourteen of the largest training camps had reported influenza outbreaks in March, April, or May, and some of the infected troops carried the virus with them aboard ships to France …
“As soldiers in the trenches became sick, the military evacuated them from the front lines and replaced them with healthy men.
“This process continuously brought the virus into contact with new hosts—young, healthy soldiers in which it could adapt, reproduce, and become extremely virulent without danger of burning out.
“… Before any travel ban could be imposed, a contingent of replacement troops departed Camp Devens (outside of Boston) for Camp Upton, Long Island, the Army’s debarkation point for France, and took influenza with them.
“Medical officers at Upton said it arrived “abruptly” on September 13, 1918, with 38 hospital admissions, followed by 86 the next day, and 193 the next.
“Hospital admissions peaked on October 4 with 483, and within 40 days, Camp Upton sent 6,131 men to the hospital for influenza. Some developed pneumonia so quickly that physicians diagnosed it simply by observing the patient rather than listening to the lungs…” (7)
“The United States was not the only country in possession of the Rockefeller Institute’s experimental bacterial vaccine.
“A 1919 report from the Institute states: “Reference should be made that before the United States entered the war (in April 1917) the Institute had resumed the preparation of anti-meningococcic serum, in order to meet the requests of England, France, Belgium Italy and other countries.”
“The same report states: “In order to meet the suddenly increased demand for the curative serums worked out at the Institute, a special stable for horses was quickly erected …” (8)
An experimental anti-meningoccic serum made in horses and injected into soldiers who would be entering the cramped and unsanitary living conditions of war … what could possibly go wrong?
Is the bacterial serum made in horses at the Rockefeller Institute which was injected into US soldiers and distributed to numerous other countries responsible for the 50-100 million people killed by bacterial lung infections in 1918-19?
The Institute says it distributed the bacterial serum to England, France, Belgium, Italy and other countries during WWI. Not enough is known about how these countries experimented on their soldiers.
I hope independent researchers will take an honest look at these questions.
The Road to Hell is Paved with Good Intentions
I do not believe that anyone involved in these vaccine experiments was trying to harm anyone.
Some will see the name Rockefeller and yell. “Illuminati!” or “culling the herd!”
I do not believe that’s what happened.
I believe standard medical hubris is responsible – doctors “playing God”, thinking they can tame nature without creating unanticipated problems.
With medical hubris, I do not think the situation has changed materially over the past 100 years.
What Now?
The vaccine industry is always looking for human test subjects. They have the most success when they are able to find populations who not in a position to refuse.
Soldiers (9), infants, the disabled, prisoners, those in developing nations – anyone not in a position to refuse.
Vaccine experimentation on vulnerable populations is not an issue of the past. Watch this video clip of Dr. Stanley Plotkin where he describes using experimental vaccines on orphans, the mentally retarded, prisoners, and those under colonial rule.
The deposition was in January 2018. The hubris of the medical community is the same or worse now than it was 100 years ago.
Watch as Dr. Plotkin admits to writing:
“The question is whether we are to have experiments performed on fully functioning adults and on children who are potentially contributors to society or to perform initial studies in children and adults who are human in form but not in social potential.”
Please watch the horrifying video clip of Dr. Stanley Plotkin testifying under oath about the experiments that the pharmaceutical industry has done on unaware, uninformed patients. https://youtu.be/yevV_slu7Dw (10)
In part because the global community is well aware of medical hubris and well aware of the poor record of medical ethics, the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights developed international standards regarding the right to informed consent to preventative medical procedures like vaccination.
The international community is well aware that the pharmaceutical industry makes mistakes and is always on the lookout for human test subjects. The Declaration states that individuals have the human right to consent to any preventative medical intervention like vaccination.
Article 3 – Human Dignity and Human Rights
1. Human dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms are to be fully respected.
2. The interests and welfare of the individual should have priority over the sole interest of science or society.
Article 6 – Consent
1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice. (11)
Clean water, sanitation, flushing toilets, refrigerated foods and healthy diets have done and still do far more to protect humanity from infectious diseases than any vaccine program.
Doctor and the vaccine industry have usurped credit which rightfully belongs to plumbers, electricians, sandhogs, engineers and city planners.
For these reasons, policy makers at all levels of government should protect the human rights and individual liberties of individuals to opt out of vaccine programs via exemptions.
The hubris of the medical community will never go away. Policy makers need to know that vaccines like all medical interventions are not infallible.
Vaccines are not magic. We all have different susceptibility to disease. Human beings are not one size fits all.
In 1918-19, the vaccine industry experimented on soldiers, likely with disastrous results.
In 2018, the vaccine industry experiments on infants every day. The vaccine schedule has never been tested as it is given. The results of the experiment are in: 1 in 7 of America’s fully vaccinated children is in some form of special education and over 50{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} have some form of chronic illness. (12)
In 1918-19, there was no safety follow up after vaccines were delivered.
In 2018, there is virtually no safety follow up after a vaccine is delivered.
Who exactly gave you that flu shot at Rite Aid? Do you have their cell number of the store employee if something goes wrong?
In 1918-19, there was no liability to the manufacturer for injuries or death caused by vaccines.
In 2018, there is no liability for vaccine manufacturers for injuries or death caused by vaccines, which was formalized in 1986. (13)
In 1918-19, there was no independent investigative follow up challenging the official story that “Spanish Flu” was some mystery illness which dropped from the sky. I suspect that many of those at the Rockefeller Institute knew what happened, and that many of the doctors who administered the vaccines to the troops knew what happened, but those people are long dead.
In 2018, the Pharmaceutical industry is the largest campaign donor to politicians and the largest advertiser in all forms of media, so not much has changed over 100 years.
This story will likely be ignored by mainstream media because their salaries are paid by pharmaceutical advertising.
The next time you hear someone say “vaccines save lives” please remember that the true story of the cost/benefit of vaccines is much more complicated than their three-word slogan. Also remember that vaccines may have killed 50-100 million people in 1918-19. If true, those costs greatly outweighed any benefit, especially considering that plumbers, electricians, sandhogs and engineers did, and continue to do, the real work which reduces mortality from disease.
Vaccines are not magic. Human rights and bioethics are critically important. Policy makers should understand the history of medical hubris and protect individual and parental human rights as described in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.
——
Kevin Barry is the President of First Freedoms, Inc. a 501.c.3. He is a former federal attorney, a rep at the UN HQ in New York and the author of Vaccine Whistleblower: Exposing Autism Research Fraud at the CDC. Please support our work at www.firstfreedoms.org
Originally published at FirstFreedoms.org. Reprinted with permission.
References
1. Deaths from Bacterial Pneumonia during 1918–19 Influenza Pandemic
John F. Brundage* and G. Dennis Shanks†
Author affiliations: *Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA; †Australian Army Malaria Institute, Enoggera, Queensland, Australia
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/arti cle/14/8/07-1313_article
2. World Health Organization: Unsafe drinking water, sanitation and waste management
http://www.who.int/sustainable -development/cities/health- risks/water-sanitation/en/
3. J Infect Dis. 2008 Oct 1; 198(7): 962–970.
Predominant Role of Bacterial Pneumonia as a Cause of Death in Pandemic Influenza: Implications for Pandemic Influenza Preparedness
David M. Morens, Jeffery K. Taubenberger, and Anthony S. Fauci
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p mc/articles/PMC2599911/
4. PDF of Fort Riley Study (1918)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p mc/articles/PMC2126288/pdf/449 .pdf
5. American Experience, “The First Wave”, PBS
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/ameri canexperience/features/influen za-first-wave/
6. Mayo Clinic: Meningitis
www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-co nditions/meningitis/symptoms- causes/syc-20350508
7. Public Health Rep. 2010; 125(Suppl 3): 82–91.
The U.S. Military and the Influenza Pandemic of 1918–1919
Carol R. Byerly, PhD
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p mc/articles/PMC2862337/
8. Rockefeller Institute pamphlet PDF (1919)
https://digitalcommons.rockefe ller.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? article=1005&context= rockefeller-institute-descript ive-pamphlet
9. Is Military Research Hazardous to Veterans’ Health? Lessons Spanning Half a Century, A Staff Report Prepared for the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, United States Senate, December 1994
https://www.hsdl.org/?abstract &did=438835
10. Dr. Stanley Plotkin: vaccine experiments on orphans, the mentally retarded, and others (January 2018)
https://youtu.be/yevV_slu7Dw
11. Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (19 October 2005)
http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev .php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TO PIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
12. CDC Offers New Stats On Disability Prevalence
https://www.disabilityscoop.co m/2016/03/14/cdc-disability-pr evalence/22034/
13. 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act
https://worldmercuryproject.or g/news/childhood-vaccine-injur y-act-protect/
About the author: Dr. Gary G. Kohls is a medical doctor working for most of his career as a rural, full-service family practice physician. In 1984 he was awarded a Bush Foundation Medical Fellowship. In the early 1990s Dr. Kohls worked at a Regional Treatment Center as a physician for psychiatric inpatients and later worked at a psychological services clinic. Now retired, he continues to present lectures and seminars to healthcare professionals and the general public, as well as editing the popular e-newsletter Preventive Psychiatry E-Newsletter (PPEN).
Read more at mindbodymedicineduluth.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Share this: Twitter
Facebook
Telegram
Gab
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
More
Pinterest
Pocket
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Print
Related