wnd--2020-09-24--Senators: Netflix partnering with 'Chinese genocide denier'

Congress members already have asked Attorney General Bill Barr to prosecute Netflix for `` child pornography '' for its movie `` Cuties . ''
Now lawmakers are concerned about the streaming site 's `` partnership '' with a foreigner described as a `` Chinese genocide denier . ''
The Washington Free Beacon reported Republican senators are demanding Netflix explain its decision to adapt a Chinese science fiction trilogy written by a Xinjiang genocide denier into an original series .
Sens .
Marsha Blackburn , R-Tenn. , and Rick Scott , R-Fla. , are among the senators spotlighting the effort to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Three-Body Problem '' trilogy into a live-action series .
Liu defended his government 's brutal oppression of Uyghurs , a Muslim minority group , in an interview with the New Yorker .
The Congress members said the Chinese Communist Party `` is committing atrocities '' in the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region .
`` Sadly , a number of U.S. companies continue to either actively or tacitly allow the normalization of … these crimes , '' they said .
`` The decision to produce an adaptation of Mr. Liu ’ s work can be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Beacon reported Netflix 's `` collaboration with Liu reflects Hollywood 's willingness to cater to the massive Chinese market , even if it means turning a blind eye to the country 's human rights abuses . ''
`` Disney 's recent live-action remake of Mulan even thanked Xinjiang authorities – some of them directly implicated in the Uighur crackdown – in its closing credit .
Hollywood studios also routinely avoid topics that might anger Chinese censors , going so far as to change movie villains ’ nationalities from Chinese to North Korean , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was in a 2019 interview that Liu defended his nation 's one-child forced-abortion practices , its authoritarian government , and its restrictions on Uyghurs .
The Uyghurs , he said , `` posed a terrorist threat . ''
And his government , he alleged , was `` trying to lift them out of poverty . ''
Netflix has listed Lui as a `` consulting producer '' for its proposed series .
`` The senators wrote that the partnership made Netflix complicit in the ongoing repression of the Uighurs and asked the company if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
They did not go as far as to call for the outright cancellation of the adaptation but asked whether the company will 'cast a critical eye ' on the project , '' the Beacon said .
The letter warned : `` While Congress seriously considers the systemic crimes carried out against the Uighurs , we have significant concerns with Netflix ’ s decision to do business with an individual who is parroting dangerous CCP propaganda , '' the letter read .
`` In the face of such atrocities ... there no longer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ complicity . ''
The plans for the series came about when Bela Bajaria , a Joe Biden campaign megadonor , was in charge of international content for Netflix .
The Free Beacon said Bajaria and her husband Doug Prochilo cohosted a Biden fundraiser seeking donations from the Hollywood elite headlined by vice-presidential candidate Kamala Harris , D. , Calif. , in September .
Prochilo , also a prolific Biden donor , deleted his Twitter account after the Free Beacon reported he tweeted denigrating comments about Republican women .
At one point he insulted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` Pipe down , you illegal immigrant criminal . ''
The `` Cuties '' movie by Netflix has been widely criticized for its blatant sexualization of young girls .
`` The First Amendment protects corporations and individuals from obscenity law if they can prove artistic expression , but this protection rightfully does not apply to child pornography , '' the letter by Reps. Doug Collins , R-Ga. , Jim Banks , R-Ind.
, and 32 of colleagues said .
`` 'Cuties ' is child pornography and its distributors should be prosecuted accordingly .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor , and that conduct does not need to specifically depict sexual activity to qualify . ''
The letter said the movie meets that definition in several scenes .
It includes a scene in which an 11-year-old girl dressed in a tank top and panties is splashed with water and begins twerking .
It also displays an 11-year-old child 's bare breast .

Congress members already have asked Attorney General Bill Barr to prosecute Netflix for "child pornography" for its movie "Cuties." Now lawmakers are concerned about the streaming site's "partnership" with a foreigner described as a "Chinese genocide denier."
The Washington Free Beacon reported Republican senators are demanding Netflix explain its decision to adapt a Chinese science fiction trilogy written by a Xinjiang genocide denier into an original series.
Sens. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., and Rick Scott, R-Fla., are among the senators spotlighting the effort to turn Chinese author Liu Cixin's "Three-Body Problem" trilogy into a live-action series.
Liu defended his government's brutal oppression of Uyghurs, a Muslim minority group, in an interview with the New Yorker.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
The Congress members said the Chinese Communist Party "is committing atrocities" in the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region.
"Sadly, a number of U.S. companies continue to either actively or tacitly allow the normalization of … these crimes," they said. "The decision to produce an adaptation of Mr. Liu’s work can be viewed as such normalization."
The Beacon reported Netflix's "collaboration with Liu reflects Hollywood's willingness to cater to the massive Chinese market, even if it means turning a blind eye to the country's human rights abuses."
"Disney's recent live-action remake of Mulan even thanked Xinjiang authorities – some of them directly implicated in the Uighur crackdown – in its closing credit. Hollywood studios also routinely avoid topics that might anger Chinese censors, going so far as to change movie villains’ nationalities from Chinese to North Korean," the Free Beacon said.
It was in a 2019 interview that Liu defended his nation's one-child forced-abortion practices, its authoritarian government, and its restrictions on Uyghurs.
The Uyghurs, he said, "posed a terrorist threat."
And his government, he alleged, was "trying to lift them out of poverty."
Netflix has listed Lui as a "consulting producer" for its proposed series.
"The senators wrote that the partnership made Netflix complicit in the ongoing repression of the Uighurs and asked the company if it knew of Liu's pro-China comments. They did not go as far as to call for the outright cancellation of the adaptation but asked whether the company will 'cast a critical eye' on the project," the Beacon said.
The letter warned: "While Congress seriously considers the systemic crimes carried out against the Uighurs, we have significant concerns with Netflix’s decision to do business with an individual who is parroting dangerous CCP propaganda," the letter read. "In the face of such atrocities ... there no longer exist corporate decisions of complacency, only complicity."
The plans for the series came about when Bela Bajaria, a Joe Biden campaign megadonor, was in charge of international content for Netflix.
The Free Beacon said Bajaria and her husband Doug Prochilo cohosted a Biden fundraiser seeking donations from the Hollywood elite headlined by vice-presidential candidate Kamala Harris, D., Calif., in September.
Prochilo, also a prolific Biden donor, deleted his Twitter account after the Free Beacon reported he tweeted denigrating comments about Republican women.
At one point he insulted first lady Melania Trump, saying, "Pipe down, you illegal immigrant criminal."
The "Cuties" movie by Netflix has been widely criticized for its blatant sexualization of young girls.
"The First Amendment protects corporations and individuals from obscenity law if they can prove artistic expression, but this protection rightfully does not apply to child pornography," the letter by Reps. Doug Collins, R-Ga., Jim Banks, R-Ind., and 32 of colleagues said.
"'Cuties' is child pornography and its distributors should be prosecuted accordingly."
Federal law defines child pornography as "any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor, and that conduct does not need to specifically depict sexual activity to qualify."
The letter said the movie meets that definition in several scenes.
It includes a scene in which an 11-year-old girl dressed in a tank top and panties is splashed with water and begins twerking. It also displays an 11-year-old child's bare breast.


wnd--2020-09-24--Excerpt: Book explains why globalists are determined to dump Trump

Note : Donald Trump may be the most demonized president in U.S. history , simply because his ultra-rich enemies own the media .
But who is it – really – that hates President Donald Trump so much , and why ?
With his `` America First '' slogan , he launched a massive attack on the globalist billionaires ' empire that for decades has benefited from the outsourcing of jobs and wealth to Communist China and the ultra-rich .
In her new book , `` Trump : The Battle for America , '' Hanne Herland cuts through the mainstream media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elite hegemony .
The following is an exclusive excerpt from Herland 's book .
For the past years , I have interviewed leading American intellectuals , former CIA and NSA directors , professors , bishops and bestselling authors , former news editors , psychologists and directors from Judicial Watch about the divisiveness in the United States .
The disturbing conclusion from these talks form the basis for this shocking analysis of the state of affairs in America , behind the media propaganda smoke screen .
If we follow the money , we notice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only a few corporations with widespread interest in the globalist , transnational capitalist system that profits from lack of national sovereignty .
This business model is dependent on weak nation states , that easily may be overrun by global corporations that crush the middle class and local businesses .
Since the 1980s , globalism has worked .
It has reinforced an economic model that departs from the nation-based capitalist system and benefits the ultra-rich in an unprecedented scale .
Hanne Herland 's latest book , `` Trump : The Battle for America , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ explains why the globalists are so intent to get rid of the president .
Globalism has produced a system in which few individuals now own over 50 % of world assets , only made possible by the transnational model that refuses to redistribute wealth when outsourcing jobs to China .
This system depends on open borders , no tax to specific nations and China 's manipulation of its currency to retain its cheap prices .
Naturally , President Trump , who wants to implement a more just system for the American working class @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seeks to reinstate the national sovereignty and rebuild America , yet faces the worst enemies among his own .
China and the Western billionaire oligarchs have joined forces and benefit massively from the globalist system .
To rephrase : The rise of China has fueled the rise of the Western oligarch super-rich elite , who bypass the Western worker and produce goods in cheap-labor countries without redistributing wealth back to the West .
Due to the implementation of open borders , most companies are registered in tax havens .
Socialism is important as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ New Left Tyranny .
The Authoritarian destruction of our Way of Life , '' a strict totalitarian social control and cohesion of the population , so that its socialist elite can do whatever they want , since the people are heavily subjected to propaganda .
We saw this partnership work very well between socialism and the capitalist industrial elite in National Socialist ( NAZI ) Germany under Hitler .
It may be argued that in a socialist system , freedom becomes the right to agree with the Marxist elite who have joined forces @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is defined as the post-war Marxist ideology that later was pushed by the New Left into Western societies , deconstructing traditional Western values .
During the student revolution in the 1960s , these neo-Marxists took power over the media , the publishing houses , the universities and public discourse .
It is from this pool of thought that Critical Race Theory was developed .
Communism , Marxism , National Socialism and neo-Marxism are all variations of the same socialist ideology .
From this neo-Marxist pool of thought grew the current millennial generation of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now cause anarchist havoc .
The current ultra-rich – most of whom are socialists and left-wing – partner with low-cost China and sadly produce the death of the middle class and the working class in the West .
There are obvious pros , too .
We are in the middle of an economic revolution in which great business minds , such as that of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos , makes books , clothes and items available to all without entering a shop .
It arrives straight from China and other producing nations to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ added to this process , as people are forced to remain at home , shopping on Amazon , adding remarkable speed to the end of the middle-class business owners .
As production is outsourced to China and the East , jobs are lost in the West .
This is Donald Trump 's point .
The inner-city ghettos are only growing worse .
There needs to be a free market for the smartest to operate , yet still , we need a population with sufficient purchasing power .
President Donald Trump is no saint @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to rebuild the nation , return jobs to Americans and work for a more just trade agreement with China .
Will he succeed ?

Note: Donald Trump may be the most demonized president in U.S. history, simply because his ultra-rich enemies own the media. But who is it – really – that hates President Donald Trump so much, and why? With his "America First" slogan, he launched a massive attack on the globalist billionaires' empire that for decades has benefited from the outsourcing of jobs and wealth to Communist China and the ultra-rich. In her new book, "Trump: The Battle for America," Hanne Herland cuts through the mainstream media rhetoric and explains why Trump challenges this elite hegemony. The following is an exclusive excerpt from Herland's book.
For the past years, I have interviewed leading American intellectuals, former CIA and NSA directors, professors, bishops and bestselling authors, former news editors, psychologists and directors from Judicial Watch about the divisiveness in the United States. The disturbing conclusion from these talks form the basis for this shocking analysis of the state of affairs in America, behind the media propaganda smoke screen.
If we follow the money, we notice that the U.S. media are owned by only a few corporations with widespread interest in the globalist, transnational capitalist system that profits from lack of national sovereignty. This business model is dependent on weak nation states, that easily may be overrun by global corporations that crush the middle class and local businesses. Since the 1980s, globalism has worked. It has reinforced an economic model that departs from the nation-based capitalist system and benefits the ultra-rich in an unprecedented scale.
Hanne Herland's latest book, "Trump: The Battle for America," cuts through the media fog and explains why the globalists are so intent to get rid of the president.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
Globalism has produced a system in which few individuals now own over 50% of world assets, only made possible by the transnational model that refuses to redistribute wealth when outsourcing jobs to China.
This system depends on open borders, no tax to specific nations and China's manipulation of its currency to retain its cheap prices. Naturally, President Trump, who wants to implement a more just system for the American working class, becomes a full-front enemy. Trump seeks to reinstate the national sovereignty and rebuild America, yet faces the worst enemies among his own.
China and the Western billionaire oligarchs have joined forces and benefit massively from the globalist system. To rephrase: The rise of China has fueled the rise of the Western oligarch super-rich elite, who bypass the Western worker and produce goods in cheap-labor countries without redistributing wealth back to the West. Due to the implementation of open borders, most companies are registered in tax havens.
Socialism is important as it provides, as described in "New Left Tyranny. The Authoritarian destruction of our Way of Life," a strict totalitarian social control and cohesion of the population, so that its socialist elite can do whatever they want, since the people are heavily subjected to propaganda. We saw this partnership work very well between socialism and the capitalist industrial elite in National Socialist (NAZI) Germany under Hitler. It may be argued that in a socialist system, freedom becomes the right to agree with the Marxist elite who have joined forces with the robbery capitalist owners.
Neo-Marxism is defined as the post-war Marxist ideology that later was pushed by the New Left into Western societies, deconstructing traditional Western values. During the student revolution in the 1960s, these neo-Marxists took power over the media, the publishing houses, the universities and public discourse. It is from this pool of thought that Critical Race Theory was developed. Communism, Marxism, National Socialism and neo-Marxism are all variations of the same socialist ideology. From this neo-Marxist pool of thought grew the current millennial generation of well-funded Antifa rebel, gullible brats that now cause anarchist havoc.
The current ultra-rich – most of whom are socialists and left-wing – partner with low-cost China and sadly produce the death of the middle class and the working class in the West. There are obvious pros, too. We are in the middle of an economic revolution in which great business minds, such as that of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, makes books, clothes and items available to all without entering a shop. It arrives straight from China and other producing nations to your doorstep. The COVID-19 crisis has added to this process, as people are forced to remain at home, shopping on Amazon, adding remarkable speed to the end of the middle-class business owners.
As production is outsourced to China and the East, jobs are lost in the West. This is Donald Trump's point. The inner-city ghettos are only growing worse. There needs to be a free market for the smartest to operate, yet still, we need a population with sufficient purchasing power.
President Donald Trump is no saint, but he has stated his wish to rebuild the nation, return jobs to Americans and work for a more just trade agreement with China. Will he succeed?
Order Hanne Herland's latest book, "Trump: The Battle for America."


wnd--2020-09-24--The canary in the constitutional mine is gasping

Note : Dr. Singleton is a member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons , AAPS .
Constitution Day passed us by without the celebration it richly deserved .
Limiting the powers of the federal government is at the core of our Constitution .
Ten years ago , the Affordable Care Act tested the limits of federal powers .
The barely noticed federal takeover of student loans , the mandated purchase of health insurance from a limited list of insurers with a limited list of doctors were only the start .
The federally defined `` essential '' medical services @ @ @ @ @ @ @ controls .
We are now living through the consequences of government deciding what activities are `` essential '' in the lives of normal , sentient human beings .
Some congresspersons and assorted social justice warriors are treating the Constitution like the COVID-susceptible residents of New York nursing homes : expendable .
Or like the 26,000 dementia patients whose death was hastened by the isolation resulting from unscientific lockdowns .
The First Amendment is irrelevant for those whom the leftist mob detests .
The mob and its social media enablers reserve freedom of speech @ @ @ @ @ @ @ libertarians need not apply .
COVID-19 provided a justification for abridging freedom of assembly and religious freedom .
Is openly professing one 's faith not essential to our well-being ?
Certainly , religious services where congregations can easily be instructed on safely participating in group worship presents less risk than sauntering through Walmart .
The Second Amendment erosion continues despite gutting police departments and the resultant rapidly increasing violent crime , including 710 more homicides than this time last year .
Within hours after a would-be assassin used a handgun to ambush two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for a ban on `` weapons of war . ''
Are we to fend for ourselves with kitchen knives and pointy-headed garden gnomes ?
The abandonment of the Fourth Amendment 's prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure is on the table as the rumblings about mandatory COVID-19 vaccines get louder .
We are seeing new methods to erode the Fifth Amendment 's prohibition of the government `` taking '' of private property by `` eminent domain '' that go far beyond the infamous 2005 Kelo decision .
In Kelo , the Supreme Court @ @ @ @ @ @ @ use '' to include a public `` purpose . ''
The Court concluded that the government could take property from one private owner and transfer it to another private party because the public would benefit from the economic development and increased tax revenue .
Sadly , the project for which the plaintiff lost her family home was never built .
As dissenting Justice Sandra Day O'Connor noted , `` Nothing is to prevent the State from replacing any Motel 6 with a Ritz-Carlton , any home with a shopping mall , or any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ short , a `` public purpose '' can be anything the government wants it to be .
We are taking baby steps toward Marx 's ideal society without private property .
California , as usual , is the canary in our free society 's coal mine .
New legislation will allow three homes on single family lots across the state .
The federal rules that Joe Biden wants to revive will facilitate cramming us into high-density suburban concrete jungles .
How did the `` stack and pack '' housing in New York City @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
The COVID-19 mandates and lockdowns all but ignore the Ninth Amendment that enshrines the principle that we have natural rights that need not be enumerated .
The Tenth Amendment – perhaps the most powerful amendment – has been lost in the COVID-19 shuffle .
Our leaders have ignored the law of the land that provides that when it comes to inalienable rights , the people are ultimately in charge .
The 12th Amendment confirms that electors , not the popular vote , shall elect the president despite Mrs. Clinton 's assertions to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ guarantee that all states , not just New York City and California , have a voice in presidential elections .
The 13th Amendment will no longer have meaning when we are all slaves to Uncle Sam 's whims .
Universal mail-in voting and the attendant fraud grossly weakens the 15th Amendment .
As Marx predicted , a socialist society would begin by the violent seizure of the government by the people .
To achieve their goals , communist revolutionaries killed at least 100 million people .
Appearing to follow in those footsteps , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is decorating the streets with communist symbols and burning down neighborhoods – much to the displeasure of the local black residents .
At least 26 deaths are attributable to the `` peaceful protests . ''
News anchors are calling for burning the f**** thing down or blowing the system up if their demands ( having nothing to do with racial justice ) are not met .
The leftists would like to `` reimagine '' the Constitution out of existence .
When the mobs usher in a government-run dystopia , the 14th Amendment 's @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we will all `` equally share in our misery . ''
Rescue the canary .
Fight for our constitutional republic and our freedoms .

Note: Dr. Singleton is a member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, AAPS.
Constitution Day passed us by without the celebration it richly deserved. Limiting the powers of the federal government is at the core of our Constitution. Ten years ago, the Affordable Care Act tested the limits of federal powers. The barely noticed federal takeover of student loans, the mandated purchase of health insurance from a limited list of insurers with a limited list of doctors were only the start. The federally defined "essential" medical services were a road map for future government controls. We are now living through the consequences of government deciding what activities are "essential" in the lives of normal, sentient human beings.
Some congresspersons and assorted social justice warriors are treating the Constitution like the COVID-susceptible residents of New York nursing homes: expendable. Or like the 26,000 dementia patients whose death was hastened by the isolation resulting from unscientific lockdowns.
The First Amendment is irrelevant for those whom the leftist mob detests. The mob and its social media enablers reserve freedom of speech for high-minded virtue signalers. Conservatives or libertarians need not apply. COVID-19 provided a justification for abridging freedom of assembly and religious freedom. Is openly professing one's faith not essential to our well-being? Certainly, religious services where congregations can easily be instructed on safely participating in group worship presents less risk than sauntering through Walmart.
The Second Amendment erosion continues despite gutting police departments and the resultant rapidly increasing violent crime, including 710 more homicides than this time last year. Within hours after a would-be assassin used a handgun to ambush two law enforcement officers, Joe Biden called for a ban on "weapons of war." Are we to fend for ourselves with kitchen knives and pointy-headed garden gnomes?
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
The abandonment of the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure is on the table as the rumblings about mandatory COVID-19 vaccines get louder.
We are seeing new methods to erode the Fifth Amendment's prohibition of the government "taking" of private property by "eminent domain" that go far beyond the infamous 2005 Kelo decision. In Kelo, the Supreme Court liberals expanded the Constitution's "public use" to include a public "purpose." The Court concluded that the government could take property from one private owner and transfer it to another private party because the public would benefit from the economic development and increased tax revenue. Sadly, the project for which the plaintiff lost her family home was never built. As dissenting Justice Sandra Day O'Connor noted, "Nothing is to prevent the State from replacing any Motel 6 with a Ritz-Carlton, any home with a shopping mall, or any farm with a factory." In short, a "public purpose" can be anything the government wants it to be.
We are taking baby steps toward Marx's ideal society without private property. California, as usual, is the canary in our free society's coal mine. New legislation will allow three homes on single family lots across the state. The federal rules that Joe Biden wants to revive will facilitate cramming us into high-density suburban concrete jungles. How did the "stack and pack" housing in New York City where COVID-19 spread like wildfire work out?
The COVID-19 mandates and lockdowns all but ignore the Ninth Amendment that enshrines the principle that we have natural rights that need not be enumerated.
The Tenth Amendment – perhaps the most powerful amendment – has been lost in the COVID-19 shuffle. Our leaders have ignored the law of the land that provides that when it comes to inalienable rights, the people are ultimately in charge.
The 12th Amendment confirms that electors, not the popular vote, shall elect the president despite Mrs. Clinton's assertions to the contrary. The United States must guarantee that all states, not just New York City and California, have a voice in presidential elections.
The 13th Amendment will no longer have meaning when we are all slaves to Uncle Sam's whims.
Universal mail-in voting and the attendant fraud grossly weakens the 15th Amendment.
As Marx predicted, a socialist society would begin by the violent seizure of the government by the people. To achieve their goals, communist revolutionaries killed at least 100 million people. Appearing to follow in those footsteps, the Marxist Black Lives Matter Foundation Inc. is decorating the streets with communist symbols and burning down neighborhoods – much to the displeasure of the local black residents. At least 26 deaths are attributable to the "peaceful protests." News anchors are calling for burning the f**** thing down or blowing the system up if their demands (having nothing to do with racial justice) are not met.
The leftists would like to "reimagine" the Constitution out of existence. When the mobs usher in a government-run dystopia, the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause will merely ensure that we will all "equally share in our misery."
Rescue the canary. Fight for our constitutional republic and our freedoms.


wnd--2020-09-25--Pence vows 'aggressive' effort to protect 'fair election'

( WASHINGTON EXAMINER ) -- Vice President Mike Pence said the Trump administration would work aggressively to protect the integrity @ @ @ @ @ as he promised the president would respect the will of the people .
In an @ @ @ @ @ Thursday as he traveled by bus from Wisconsin to Minnesota , Pence said he and @ @ @ @ @ result of a “ free and fair election.
” But he warned of the opportunity @ @ @ @ @ his familiar stance of presidential translator , adding context and caveats to President Trump ’ @ @ @ @ @ embrace a peaceful transition .

(WASHINGTON EXAMINER) -- Vice President Mike Pence said the Trump administration would work aggressively to protect the integrity of November’s election as he promised the president would respect the will of the people.
In an interview with the Washington Examiner Thursday as he traveled by bus from Wisconsin to Minnesota, Pence said he and the president would accept the result of a “free and fair election.”
But he warned of the opportunity for fraud as he adopted his familiar stance of presidential translator, adding context and caveats to President Trump’s Wednesday evening refusal to embrace a peaceful transition.
Read the full story ›


wnd--2020-09-25--Democrats reportedly preparing bill to put term limits on all new SCOTUS justices

The country has seen the worst from Democrats since President Donald Trump was elected in 2016 .
But the current Supreme Court battle to fill the seat vacated by late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has them desperate , and there is no end to their willingness to violate long-held mores regarding civility and governance .
That includes threatening to pack the high court , allot themselves four additional senators by giving statehood to Washington , D.C. , and Puerto Rico and upend the Supreme Court by limiting terms for justices .
On Thursday , Reuters reported that House Democrats plan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if passed , would limit the tenure of each justice to only 18 years .
Currently , high court justices , like all federal court judges , enjoy lifetime appointments .
TRENDING : Why we 're tragically ending relationships over politics According to the wire service , Democrats claim that reducing terms for justices will end partisan quarrels about vacancies and will preserve the legitimacy of the court .
Of course , we know that simply is n't true , as the issue of lifetime appointments for federal judges was never an issue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ barrel last Friday of a potential 6-3 conservative majority with the death of Ginsburg .
Reuters reported that under the House Democrats ’ plan , every president would nominate two justices per term , and all current justices would be grandfathered in to their lifetime appointments .
Rep. Joe Kennedy III of Massachusetts , who threatened on Twitter last week that his party would pack the courts of Republicans dared do their jobs by filling the seat vacated by Ginsburg , will introduce the proposal , along with Reps. Don Beyer of Virginia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appropriately named Supreme Court Term Limits and Regular Appointments Act will unify the country , according to Khanna .
“ It would save the country a lot of agony and help lower the temperature over fights for the court that go to the fault lines of cultural issues and is one of the primary things tearing at our social fabric , ” the California Democrat said .
Of course , this is just the latest desperate act from Democrats in a turbulent week that has seen them threaten everything from impeachment to packing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tone that seems to surrender to the fact that they are more or less powerless on the issue of the judiciary until January , and that ’ s assuming they take the Senate , the White House or both .
Current polling doesn ’ t seem to indicate those scenarios are anything to bank their hopes on .
Even if Democrats could limit justices to 18-year terms , they would have to amend the Constitution to do so .
Lifetime appointments for justices help them avoid becoming involved in petty partisan fights — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in — and allows them to make rulings without outside pressure .
As the Senate Judiciary Committee website notes , “ Like all Federal judges , Supreme Court Justices serve lifetime appointments on the Court , in accordance with Article III of the United States Constitution.
” With how Democrats have behaved in recent years , there is little chance two-thirds of both houses of Congress would agree to amend the Constitution .
It ’ s even less likely that the requisite 34 states would ratify such a radical and politically transparent proposal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from replacing Ginsburg with a justice who wouldn ’ t legislate from the bench , and they ’ re willing to violate any norm to do so — apparently without a second thought .
The measure is sure to go nowhere in the short term , but it does give Americans further insight into their rabid desperation .
As the party of Jim Crow and slavery , Democrats have always viewed the Constitution as something to circumvent .
Unfortunately for those in the House , they ’ d need a strong majority to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for years they abhor .
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal .

The country has seen the worst from Democrats since President Donald Trump was elected in 2016.
But the current Supreme Court battle to fill the seat vacated by late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has them desperate, and there is no end to their willingness to violate long-held mores regarding civility and governance.
That includes threatening to pack the high court, allot themselves four additional senators by giving statehood to Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico and upend the Supreme Court by limiting terms for justices.
On Thursday, Reuters reported that House Democrats plan to introduce legislation next week that, if passed, would limit the tenure of each justice to only 18 years.
Currently, high court justices, like all federal court judges, enjoy lifetime appointments.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
According to the wire service, Democrats claim that reducing terms for justices will end partisan quarrels about vacancies and will preserve the legitimacy of the court.
Of course, we know that simply isn't true, as the issue of lifetime appointments for federal judges was never an issue until Democrats found themselves staring down the barrel last Friday of a potential 6-3 conservative majority with the death of Ginsburg.
Reuters reported that under the House Democrats’ plan, every president would nominate two justices per term, and all current justices would be grandfathered in to their lifetime appointments.
Rep. Joe Kennedy III of Massachusetts, who threatened on Twitter last week that his party would pack the courts of Republicans dared do their jobs by filling the seat vacated by Ginsburg, will introduce the proposal, along with Reps. Don Beyer of Virginia and Ro Khanna of California.
If he holds a vote in 2020, we pack the court in 2021. It’s that simple. — Rep. Joe Kennedy III (@RepJoeKennedy) September 19, 2020
The appropriately named Supreme Court Term Limits and Regular Appointments Act will unify the country, according to Khanna.
“It would save the country a lot of agony and help lower the temperature over fights for the court that go to the fault lines of cultural issues and is one of the primary things tearing at our social fabric,” the California Democrat said.
Of course, this is just the latest desperate act from Democrats in a turbulent week that has seen them threaten everything from impeachment to packing the courts.
The proposal has a tone that seems to surrender to the fact that they are more or less powerless on the issue of the judiciary until January, and that’s assuming they take the Senate, the White House or both.
Current polling doesn’t seem to indicate those scenarios are anything to bank their hopes on.
Even if Democrats could limit justices to 18-year terms, they would have to amend the Constitution to do so.
Lifetime appointments for justices help them avoid becoming involved in petty partisan fights — like the ones Democrats are always engaged in — and allows them to make rulings without outside pressure.
As the Senate Judiciary Committee website notes, “Like all Federal judges, Supreme Court Justices serve lifetime appointments on the Court, in accordance with Article III of the United States Constitution.”
With how Democrats have behaved in recent years, there is little chance two-thirds of both houses of Congress would agree to amend the Constitution.
It’s even less likely that the requisite 34 states would ratify such a radical and politically transparent proposal.
Democrats are desperate to prevent Trump from replacing Ginsburg with a justice who wouldn’t legislate from the bench, and they’re willing to violate any norm to do so — apparently without a second thought.
The measure is sure to go nowhere in the short term, but it does give Americans further insight into their rabid desperation.
As the party of Jim Crow and slavery, Democrats have always viewed the Constitution as something to circumvent.
Unfortunately for those in the House, they’d need a strong majority to amend a document which they have proven for years they abhor.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.


wnd--2020-09-25--DOJ charges over 300 for alleged crimes under the guise' of peaceful protest

The Department of Justice announced Thursday that more than 300 people are now facing federal charges stemming from the violence that has occurred in cities across the country since May .
In a news release , the department said individuals in 29 states and the District of Columbia would face federal charges related to a wide range of crimes .
The crimes in question , according to the release , were `` committed adjacent to or under the guise of peaceful demonstrations . ''
The DOJ said more than 40 separate U.S. attorneys ' offices have filed charges over crimes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , to assaulting a law enforcement officer .
Other crimes being prosecuted include damaging federal property and inciting a riot .
TRENDING : Why we 're tragically ending relationships over politics Moreover , many charges are related to alleged crimes involving guns or explosives .
The crimes include `` burglary of a federally-licensed firearms dealer , '' as well as `` malicious destruction of property using fire or explosives , [ being a ] felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition , unlawful possession of a destructive device '' and `` felony @ @ @ @ @ @ @ DOJ .
“ Violent opportunists have exploited these demonstrations in various ways , ” the Justice Department said , adding that roughly 80 people `` have been charged with offenses relating to arson and explosives .
“ Approximately 15 individuals have been charged with damaging federal property .
In some instances , these individuals are alleged to have set fires to local businesses as well as city and federal property , which will regrettably incur millions of taxpayer dollars to repair damages , ” the DOJ statement added .
`` Corporate and local @ @ @ @ @ @ @ DOJ said .
`` Through these acts , these individuals have shown minimal regard to their communities and for the safety of others and themselves . ''
The release continued : “ Approximately 35 individuals have been charged with assaulting a law enforcement officer and related offenses .
One of these cases was charged in Massachusetts ; the rest of these individuals were charged in Oregon .
“ The assaults have targeted local and federal law enforcement officers , '' it added .
`` In Portland , a man is alleged to have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ behind and struck the deputy in the upper back , neck , and shoulder with a wooden baseball bat ; another man , allegedly assaulted a Deputy U.S .
Marshal with an explosive device .
In Boston , a man allegedly shot at least 11 times toward officers , including a deputized federal officer . ''
Another 30 people have been charged with civil disorder-related crimes .
`` In several instances , these individuals leveraged social media platforms to incite destruction and assaults against law enforcement officers , '' the DOJ said .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ are charged with driving to the city with the intent to participate in a riot and commit acts of violence .
`` In their possession , authorities found a black backpack containing a hammer , two containers of Sterno Firestarter Instant Flame Gel , a can of spray paint , a glass bottle of liquor with a bar-style pour top , a Glock semi-automatic firearm and two magazines loaded with ammunition . ''
The department went on to note : “ Several of these charges carry significant maximum prison sentences .
For example @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with a dangerous weapon is punishable by up to 20 years in prison.
” The DOJ also said in the release that “ Arson is punishable by up to 20 years in prison with a mandatory minimum sentence of five years in prison.
” The Justice Department announcement came following investigations conducted by a multitude of federal , state and local law enforcement agencies , including the FBI , the U.S .
Marshals Service , the Bureau of Alcohol , Tobacco , Firearms and Explosives , and dozens of U.S. attorneys ’ offices @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comes as prosecutors in some cities , such as Portland , Oregon , have refused to charge individuals arrested on charges relating to rioting .
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal .

The Department of Justice announced Thursday that more than 300 people are now facing federal charges stemming from the violence that has occurred in cities across the country since May.
In a news release, the department said individuals in 29 states and the District of Columbia would face federal charges related to a wide range of crimes.
The crimes in question, according to the release, were "committed adjacent to or under the guise of peaceful demonstrations."
The DOJ said more than 40 separate U.S. attorneys' offices have filed charges over crimes ranging from attempted murder, to arson, to assaulting a law enforcement officer.
Other crimes being prosecuted include damaging federal property and inciting a riot.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
Moreover, many charges are related to alleged crimes involving guns or explosives.
The crimes include "burglary of a federally-licensed firearms dealer," as well as "malicious destruction of property using fire or explosives, [being a] felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, unlawful possession of a destructive device" and "felony civil disorder," according to the DOJ.
“Violent opportunists have exploited these demonstrations in various ways,” the Justice Department said, adding that roughly 80 people "have been charged with offenses relating to arson and explosives.
“Approximately 15 individuals have been charged with damaging federal property. In some instances, these individuals are alleged to have set fires to local businesses as well as city and federal property, which will regrettably incur millions of taxpayer dollars to repair damages,” the DOJ statement added.
"Corporate and local businesses were also targeted," the DOJ said. "Through these acts, these individuals have shown minimal regard to their communities and for the safety of others and themselves."
The release continued: “Approximately 35 individuals have been charged with assaulting a law enforcement officer and related offenses. One of these cases was charged in Massachusetts; the rest of these individuals were charged in Oregon.
“The assaults have targeted local and federal law enforcement officers," it added.
"In Portland, a man is alleged to have approached a U.S. Marshals Deputy from behind and struck the deputy in the upper back, neck, and shoulder with a wooden baseball bat; another man, allegedly assaulted a Deputy U.S. Marshal with an explosive device. In Boston, a man allegedly shot at least 11 times toward officers, including a deputized federal officer."
Another 30 people have been charged with civil disorder-related crimes.
"In several instances, these individuals leveraged social media platforms to incite destruction and assaults against law enforcement officers," the DOJ said.
"In Cleveland, two Pennsylvania men are charged with driving to the city with the intent to participate in a riot and commit acts of violence.
"In their possession, authorities found a black backpack containing a hammer, two containers of Sterno Firestarter Instant Flame Gel, a can of spray paint, a glass bottle of liquor with a bar-style pour top, a Glock semi-automatic firearm and two magazines loaded with ammunition."
The department went on to note: “Several of these charges carry significant maximum prison sentences. For example, felony assault of a federal officer with a dangerous weapon is punishable by up to 20 years in prison.”
The DOJ also said in the release that “Arson is punishable by up to 20 years in prison with a mandatory minimum sentence of five years in prison.”
The Justice Department announcement came following investigations conducted by a multitude of federal, state and local law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, the U.S. Marshals Service, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and dozens of U.S. attorneys’ offices.
News of the federal charges also comes as prosecutors in some cities, such as Portland, Oregon, have refused to charge individuals arrested on charges relating to rioting.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.


wnd--2020-09-26--Sources: Trump to nominate Amy Coney Barrett to Supreme Court

( FOX NEWS ) President Trump plans to announce that Amy Coney Barrett will be his nominee to the Supreme @ @ @ @ @ vacated by the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg , multiple sources told Fox News @ @ @ @ @ is expected to make the announcement during a White House event on Saturday .
Barrett @ @ @ @ @ on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals .
Trump , who has a campaign rally @ @ @ @ @ Virginia , declined to say who he will announce when pressed by reporters at Joint @ @ @ @ @ ’ ll find out tomorrow , ” he said .

(FOX NEWS) President Trump plans to announce that Amy Coney Barrett will be his nominee to the Supreme Court to fill the seat vacated by the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, multiple sources told Fox News on Friday.
The president is expected to make the announcement during a White House event on Saturday. Barrett currently serves as a judge on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Trump, who has a campaign rally scheduled later Friday night in Virginia, declined to say who he will announce when pressed by reporters at Joint Base Andrews. "You’ll find out tomorrow,” he said.
Read the full story ›


wnd--2020-09-25--South African protesters storm racetrack, violently assault defenseless horses

It happened half a world away , but the violence from an angry mob against innocent creatures feels just as jarring and senseless as when it 's in our own backyard .
Fairview Racecourse in Port Elizabeth , South Africa , was the scene of a violent uprising that left at least one racehorse dead , another injured and several missing from their stables , according to The South African .
The group of former employees who police believe were responsible had been fired weeks before for stabbing a racehorse .
They were living in a makeshift encampment on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ They allegedly stormed the facility on Sept. 17 because of a dispute over their pay and unemployment benefits through South Africa 's Unemployment Insurance Fund .
The mob released 28 horses from their stables , hacking at least one to death with a machete-like instrument and injuring others , while also allegedly threatening a female trainer who tried to protect her equine charges .
“ I have dead horses , I have injured horses .
… They killed one in the bushes , '' one of the stable managers told the news outlet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
These people are barbaric , it ’ s absolute savagery.
” Eleven horses were missing as they fled into the surrounding brush , making it harder for authorities to retrieve them .
`` It is a very sad day in this country when innocent animals are slaughtered and abused due to greed and hate , '' International Racing Club spokesman Michael de Haast , whose own horses were caught up in the attack , told The South African .
`` As Gandhi said , 'The greatness of a nation and its moral @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its animals are treated , ' and I fear that our nation has lost its way unless we take a very big stand against this . ''
`` This is happening at Fairview Race Course in Nelson Mandela Bay , '' politician and YouTuber Renaldo `` Ngamla '' Gouws tweeted with footage apparently from the incident with people flooding onto grounds .
`` The protest is allegedly due to non UIF payments .
They have killed numerous horses with pangas . ''
Several of the roughly 100 protesters were arrested following the incident @ @ @ @ @ @ @ '' the racehorses , eNews Channel Africa reported .
In addition to the utter inhumanity of slaughtering these majestic creatures is the economic cost .
As of 2018 , Forbes reported that it cost the U.S. equivalent of $ 25,000 to purchase a thoroughbred racehorse and about $ 5,000 annually to care for it on a stud farm in South Africa .
Horseracing added $ 226 million to the country 's gross domestic product in that year and has been rising in popularity in the nation .
It is unclear what the mob @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as there was no monetary gain to be had by killing and maiming racehorses .
Much like the violent demonstrators in the U.S. , they apparently were simply bloodthirsty and bent on destruction as they gave in to their most base wrathful desires .
It 's a man-made tragedy that killed and injured those horses .
Property destruction is always awful and senseless , but more so when the perpetrators take the lives of defenseless animals .
This incident demonstrates that the propensity toward violence transcends borders and oceans and is a universal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the whole of humanity .
Whether it is dead horses or burned cities -- or worse -- individuals act despicably when encouraged by a mob mentality , and the only way to make them stop is with proper law and order .
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal .

It happened half a world away, but the violence from an angry mob against innocent creatures feels just as jarring and senseless as when it's in our own backyard.
Fairview Racecourse in Port Elizabeth, South Africa, was the scene of a violent uprising that left at least one racehorse dead, another injured and several missing from their stables, according to The South African.
The group of former employees who police believe were responsible had been fired weeks before for stabbing a racehorse. They were living in a makeshift encampment on the racetrack grounds despite a court-ordered prohibition.
They allegedly stormed the facility on Sept. 17 because of a dispute over their pay and unemployment benefits through South Africa's Unemployment Insurance Fund.
The mob released 28 horses from their stables, hacking at least one to death with a machete-like instrument and injuring others, while also allegedly threatening a female trainer who tried to protect her equine charges.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
“I have dead horses, I have injured horses. … They killed one in the bushes," one of the stable managers told the news outlet.
"This is an absolute nightmare. These people are barbaric, it’s absolute savagery.”
Eleven horses were missing as they fled into the surrounding brush, making it harder for authorities to retrieve them.
"It is a very sad day in this country when innocent animals are slaughtered and abused due to greed and hate," International Racing Club spokesman Michael de Haast, whose own horses were caught up in the attack, told The South African.
"As Gandhi said, 'The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated,' and I fear that our nation has lost its way unless we take a very big stand against this."
"This is happening at Fairview Race Course in Nelson Mandela Bay," politician and YouTuber Renaldo "Ngamla" Gouws tweeted with footage apparently from the incident with people flooding onto grounds.
"The protest is allegedly due to non UIF payments. They have killed numerous horses with pangas."
This is happening at Fairview Race Course in Nelson Mandela Bay. The protest is allegedly due to non UIF payments. They have killed numerous horses with pangas. pic.twitter.com/hSMeDNffXd — Renaldo "Ngamla" Gouws 🇿🇦 (@RenaldoGouws) September 17, 2020
Several of the roughly 100 protesters were arrested following the incident in which they "taunted and hurt" the racehorses, eNews Channel Africa reported.
In addition to the utter inhumanity of slaughtering these majestic creatures is the economic cost.
As of 2018, Forbes reported that it cost the U.S. equivalent of $25,000 to purchase a thoroughbred racehorse and about $5,000 annually to care for it on a stud farm in South Africa.
Horseracing added $226 million to the country's gross domestic product in that year and has been rising in popularity in the nation.
The owners of Dippin Blu Racing in Fairview, Port Elizabeth, are considering legal action against a group of its former grooms who stormed the stables in protest on Thursday, allegedly killing one horse and injuring more than 20 others https://t.co/5dVLsnmZ75 — Sunday Times (@SundayTimesZA) September 18, 2020
It is unclear what the mob wished to achieve except to exact revenge as there was no monetary gain to be had by killing and maiming racehorses.
Much like the violent demonstrators in the U.S., they apparently were simply bloodthirsty and bent on destruction as they gave in to their most base wrathful desires.
It's a man-made tragedy that killed and injured those horses.
Property destruction is always awful and senseless, but more so when the perpetrators take the lives of defenseless animals.
This incident demonstrates that the propensity toward violence transcends borders and oceans and is a universal result of a fallen nature shared by the whole of humanity.
Whether it is dead horses or burned cities -- or worse -- individuals act despicably when encouraged by a mob mentality, and the only way to make them stop is with proper law and order.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.


wnd--2020-09-25--Women's March leader: Kentucky AG Daniel Cameron is a 'sellout negro'

Surrounded by attorneys and the family of Breonna Taylor , Tamika Mallory , a co-organizer of the 2017 Women 's March , lit into Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron , who is black , calling him `` no different than the sellout negroes that sold our people into slavery . ''
Mallory , introduced by attorney Benjamin Crump at a news conference Friday , falsely claimed it was `` Daniel Cameron 's decision '' not to press charges against police officers in the death of Taylor on March 13 .
In fact , it was a citizen grand jury that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that conflicted with the Black Lives Matter narrative promoted over the past six months .
Mallory , 40 , said that as she heard Cameron saying he 's a black man , she thought of the slave ships `` with our people on them '' four centuries ago `` and how there were black men that were responsible for bringing our people over here . ''
`` Daniel Cameron is no different than the sellout negroes that sold our people into slavery and helped white man capture our people and to abuse them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were raped , while our men were raped by savages , '' she said to applause and shouts of `` Talk to him . ''
`` That is who you are , Daniel Cameron , you are a coward , you are a sellout and you were used by the system to harm your own mama , your own black mama , '' said Mallory .
`` We have no respect for you , no respect for your black skin , because all of our kinfolk are not our skinfolk , and you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all . ''
On Thursday , as WND reported , House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Taylor was `` murdered by police '' and that the U.S. has `` two systems of justice . ''
Mallory , after she was introduced by lawyer Benjamin Crump , read from the Fraternal Order of Police 's endorsement of Cameron , calling the FOP `` one of the most racist organizations that exists in America . ''
Mallory said it 's a `` lie '' that Cameron is `` here to protect citizens and to make the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It did n't matter to him one bit that those same officers could have ran into his mama 's , his black mama 's house , and shot her to death , '' she said .
`` He 's more committed to the white supremacy that he 's upholding , '' she said of the AG .
In 2018 , Mallory 's association with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan prompted calls for her resignation from the 2019 Women 's March .
She left the organization in September 2019 .
Crump has been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ law enforcement in the United States is plagued by `` systemic racism , '' beginning with his representation of the family of Trayvon Martin .
A jury found George Zimmerman acted in self-defense in the death of Martin , and compelling evidence emerged recently the prosecution used a fraudulent key witness .
That case , nevertheless , launched the Black Lives Matter movement , which picked up steam in the 2014 Ferguson , Missouri , case of Michael Brown , whose family hired Crump .
A jury and the Justice Department led by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ officer acted in self defense and the iconic `` Hands up do n't shoot '' did n't happen .
A third investigation , requested by the Brown family , came to the same conclusion this year .
This year Crump represented the families of George Floyd and Jacob Blake , and those cases , still underway , are n't as simple as they seemed to be at first .
In the case of Floyd , the former head of the Philadelphia DA 's team prosecuting accusations of police brutality , citing body cam @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , has concluded the officers did nothing wrong , adhering to their training .
Floyd had three times the lethal dose of fentanyl in his blood and , suffering from excited delirium , begged to be put on the ground while officers tried to get him into the squad car .
The autopsy showed the police department-certified neck restraint used on him was not the cause of death .
Videos released after the initial video showing Blake being shot in the back , showed him wrestling with officers and refusing their order to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ warrant out for arrest for sexually assaulting the woman who made the 911 call that led to the Aug. 23 confrontation in Kenosha , Wisconsin .
Cameron said Wednesday that according to Kentucky law , the use of force by Officers Jonathan Mattingly and Myles Cosgrove `` was justified to protect themselves . ''
The only charges were three counts of wanton endangerment against fired Officer Brett Hankison for shooting into a home next to Taylor 's with people inside .
Taylor 's boyfriend , Kenneth Walker , admits he fired first at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the door of the apartment and announced themselves before breaking in .
An independent witness confirmed that the police knocked and announced themselves .
Walker claims he heard the knocking but did n't hear police announce themselves and thought it might be Taylor 's former boyfriend .
Taylor was not asleep when she was shot , as was widely claimed , but was standing in the hallway of the dark apartment with Walker while he was firing at the officers .
Mattingly and Cosgrove returned fire after Mattingly was struck by a bullet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from Walker 's weapon .
It has also been claimed that the officers were at the wrong apartment and that Taylor was not suspected of any involvement in drug dealing .
The officers , in fact , had a `` no knock warrant '' to search Taylor 's apartment .
And they had evidence of her participation in a drug ring with the former boyfriend , Jamarcus Glover .
The Louisville Courier Journal reported in August that an internal police department report , corroborated by jail phone recordings and other documents the paper @ @ @ @ @ @ @ target in a drug probe that prompted police to request the search warrant for Taylor 's apartment .
Police had evidence packages were being delivered to Taylor 's apartment that Glover picked up .
And a recorded jail call made by Glover on the same day that Taylor was shot names her as the person who was `` handling '' his money .
No money was found at her residence during the police search , the paper said .
Other evidence of Taylor 's involvement included a call Glover made to her from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ asked her to contact one of his co-defendants to get bail money .
Taylor said the associate was `` already at the trap , '' a slang term for a house used for drug trafficking .
Glover told her to be on standby to pick him up if he made bail .
`` Love you , '' he said as he ended the call .
`` Love you , too , '' she replied .
The Courier Journal reported there were several instances in which Taylor posted bond for Glover and another man @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In the Jan. 3 call , Glover asked Taylor to contact a man named Adrian Walker — no relation to Kenneth Walker — to round up bail money .
After Taylor 's death on March 13 , according to the internal report , Glover spoke by phone with Adrian Walker , expressing his grief .
`` ...
I lose people that really be close to me .
That hurt , boy . ''
`` At the end of the day it was not my fault , '' Glover said.
`` … At @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I would have been at that house Bre would be alive , bruh .
… I do n't shoot at no police . ''

Surrounded by attorneys and the family of Breonna Taylor, Tamika Mallory, a co-organizer of the 2017 Women's March, lit into Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron, who is black, calling him "no different than the sellout negroes that sold our people into slavery."
Mallory, introduced by attorney Benjamin Crump at a news conference Friday, falsely claimed it was "Daniel Cameron's decision" not to press charges against police officers in the death of Taylor on March 13. In fact, it was a citizen grand jury that came to that determination after examining evidence that conflicted with the Black Lives Matter narrative promoted over the past six months.
Mallory, 40, said that as she heard Cameron saying he's a black man, she thought of the slave ships "with our people on them" four centuries ago "and how there were black men that were responsible for bringing our people over here."
"Daniel Cameron is no different than the sellout negroes that sold our people into slavery and helped white man capture our people and to abuse them and to traffic them while our women were raped, while our men were raped by savages," she said to applause and shouts of "Talk to him."
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
"That is who you are, Daniel Cameron, you are a coward, you are a sellout and you were used by the system to harm your own mama, your own black mama," said Mallory.
"We have no respect for you, no respect for your black skin, because all of our kinfolk are not our skinfolk, and you do not belong to black people at all."
On Thursday, as WND reported, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Taylor was "murdered by police" and that the U.S. has "two systems of justice."
Mallory, after she was introduced by lawyer Benjamin Crump, read from the Fraternal Order of Police's endorsement of Cameron, calling the FOP "one of the most racist organizations that exists in America."
Mallory said it's a "lie" that Cameron is "here to protect citizens and to make the state of Kentucky safer."
"It didn't matter to him one bit that those same officers could have ran into his mama's, his black mama's house, and shot her to death," she said.
"He's more committed to the white supremacy that he's upholding," she said of the AG.
In 2018, Mallory's association with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan prompted calls for her resignation from the 2019 Women's March. She left the organization in September 2019.
Crump has been at the forefront of the movement claiming law enforcement in the United States is plagued by "systemic racism," beginning with his representation of the family of Trayvon Martin. A jury found George Zimmerman acted in self-defense in the death of Martin, and compelling evidence emerged recently the prosecution used a fraudulent key witness.
That case, nevertheless, launched the Black Lives Matter movement, which picked up steam in the 2014 Ferguson, Missouri, case of Michael Brown, whose family hired Crump. A jury and the Justice Department led by Barack Obama and Eric Holder found the officer acted in self defense and the iconic "Hands up don't shoot" didn't happen. A third investigation, requested by the Brown family, came to the same conclusion this year.
This year Crump represented the families of George Floyd and Jacob Blake, and those cases, still underway, aren't as simple as they seemed to be at first.
In the case of Floyd, the former head of the Philadelphia DA's team prosecuting accusations of police brutality, citing body cam footage and the autopsy and toxicology reports, has concluded the officers did nothing wrong, adhering to their training. Floyd had three times the lethal dose of fentanyl in his blood and, suffering from excited delirium, begged to be put on the ground while officers tried to get him into the squad car. The autopsy showed the police department-certified neck restraint used on him was not the cause of death.
Videos released after the initial video showing Blake being shot in the back, showed him wrestling with officers and refusing their order to drop a knife. Blake had a warrant out for arrest for sexually assaulting the woman who made the 911 call that led to the Aug. 23 confrontation in Kenosha, Wisconsin.
See Tamika Mallory's remarks:
Cameron said Wednesday that according to Kentucky law, the use of force by Officers Jonathan Mattingly and Myles Cosgrove "was justified to protect themselves." The only charges were three counts of wanton endangerment against fired Officer Brett Hankison for shooting into a home next to Taylor's with people inside.
Taylor's boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, admits he fired first at police, who contend they knocked at the door of the apartment and announced themselves before breaking in. An independent witness confirmed that the police knocked and announced themselves. Walker claims he heard the knocking but didn't hear police announce themselves and thought it might be Taylor's former boyfriend. Taylor was not asleep when she was shot, as was widely claimed, but was standing in the hallway of the dark apartment with Walker while he was firing at the officers.
Mattingly and Cosgrove returned fire after Mattingly was struck by a bullet that, according to forensics, came from Walker's weapon.
It has also been claimed that the officers were at the wrong apartment and that Taylor was not suspected of any involvement in drug dealing. The officers, in fact, had a "no knock warrant" to search Taylor's apartment. And they had evidence of her participation in a drug ring with the former boyfriend, Jamarcus Glover.
The Louisville Courier Journal reported in August that an internal police department report, corroborated by jail phone recordings and other documents the paper obtained, show Glover was the main target in a drug probe that prompted police to request the search warrant for Taylor's apartment.
Police had evidence packages were being delivered to Taylor's apartment that Glover picked up. And a recorded jail call made by Glover on the same day that Taylor was shot names her as the person who was "handling" his money.
No money was found at her residence during the police search, the paper said.
Other evidence of Taylor's involvement included a call Glover made to her from jail on Jan. 3 in which he asked her to contact one of his co-defendants to get bail money.
Taylor said the associate was "already at the trap," a slang term for a house used for drug trafficking. Glover told her to be on standby to pick him up if he made bail.
"Love you," he said as he ended the call.
"Love you, too," she replied.
The Courier Journal reported there were several instances in which Taylor posted bond for Glover and another man involved in the case, Darreal Forest.
In the Jan. 3 call, Glover asked Taylor to contact a man named Adrian Walker — no relation to Kenneth Walker — to round up bail money.
After Taylor's death on March 13, according to the internal report, Glover spoke by phone with Adrian Walker, expressing his grief.
"I’m tore," he said. I'm tore.
"... I lose people that really be close to me. That hurt, boy."
Glover blamed Kenneth Walker for Taylor's death.
"At the end of the day it was not my fault," Glover said. " … At the end of the day, if I would have been at that house Bre would be alive, bruh. … I don't shoot at no police."


wnd--2020-09-25--Trump must use Insurrection Act on domestic terrorists!

If former President Ronald Reagan were now in office , does anyone who lived during his remarkable modern presidency believe that `` The Gipper '' would not have taken strong action to hold the Communist Chinese accountable for unleashing what was likely a bioweapon , causing death and destruction in our nation and globally ?
!
Does anyone also think that Reagan would have gone more than 24 hours in taking charge of local police and other law enforcement and put down what is a modern-day Bolshevik revolution to overthrow the vision and creation of our Founding Fathers on July @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the country 's birthplace of Philadelphia ?
!
The answer to both questions is a resounding no !
Over the last weeks in particular , I have engaged in discussions with some of my self-professed conservative friends who continue to maintain that what the president is doing , or should I say not doing , in particular with regard to the violence in the streets , is politically shrewd .
By putting the onus on local and state officials to quell the violence in major cities and then telling the American people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ federal forces in to lock up the `` Bolsheviks , '' they cynically argue , The Donald is shrewdly harming the political prospects of not just Joe Biden and Kamala Harris , but all Democrats this fall .
But cynical political ploys like this have not stopped the looting , burning , maiming and killings of not just the police , property and person , but ordinary citizens , including very young children !
Moreover , attacking the Chicoms with words and not deeds , and not instructing Attorney General Bill Barr , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ freeze all Chinese assets to eventually pay for the destruction of our health and our economy over COVID-19 , and then also not supporting Freedom Watch 's class action suits in Dallas , Texas , seeking redress of the huge damage to the American people , is not presidential , but simply a cop out , pun intended .
Let me be clear , I , Larry Klayman , in my personal capacity will vote for Donald Trump to be reelected .
Freedom Watch and I have been his de facto law firm @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he was forced to endure the Russian collusion witch hunt and a phony impeachment .
That aside , President Trump must exercise real leadership during this perilous time if he hopes to be reelected , much more truly represent the interests of We the People .
For instance , as pointed out recently by a real and highly distinguished conservative icon , Ambassador Alan Keyes , who not coincidentally penned the foreword to my new book , which can be pre-ordered on Amazon.com , `` It Takes a Revolution : Forget the Scandal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of 1807 , 10 U.S.C .
251-255 and 10 U.S.C .
331-335 ; amended 2006,2007 , which is still on the books and can be implemented , President Trump can take control of even local law enforcement , notwithstanding the military , to put down an insurrection when state and local public officials fail to act .
The Insurrection Act , was signed into law by President Thomas Jefferson , interestingly , since my book is dedicated to this greatest of Founding Fathers and third American president .
As explained recently by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gives U.S. presidents the authority to deploy active military ( and law enforcement ) to maintain or restore peace in times of crisis .
The Insurrection Act was invoked numerous times in the 20th century , most famously when Dwight D. Eisenhower sent the 101st Airborne Division to enforce the desegregation of public schools in Little Rock , Arkansas .
`` But the origins of the Insurrection Act date back more than 200 years to a bizarre chapter in American history – when Aaron Burr plotted to raise an army and establish his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ . ''
Yes , President Trump has done many good things – including most recently his peace initiative in the Middle East – but today we live in a country that is sinking faster than the Titanic , as the music plays on deck , entertaining the doomed ship 's passengers as cable news does today .
If our president does not act under these dire circumstances , and merely sends tweets and makes speeches threatening real action , the populace will lose any real faith in government that may be left after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ President Trump will lose support among his electoral base as well as independents , support he dearly needs to be reelected .
My criticism is `` tough love , '' not intended to put down the president , but to have him truly serve the interests of the American people .
If he does this , surely he will continue as president of the United States , sparing We the People from the clownish , brain-dead if not totally stupid , far-left patsy Joe Biden and his evil and hate-filled vice-presidential pick , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` It Takes a Revolution : Forget the Scandal Industry ! ''
at Amazon.com and all major booksellers online , and sign up for and support our class action against the Chicoms and other hard-hitting cases and citizens grand juries by going to www.freedomwatchusa.org .
And listen and take to heart my radio show this week , embedded below :

If former President Ronald Reagan were now in office, does anyone who lived during his remarkable modern presidency believe that "The Gipper" would not have taken strong action to hold the Communist Chinese accountable for unleashing what was likely a bioweapon, causing death and destruction in our nation and globally?! Does anyone also think that Reagan would have gone more than 24 hours in taking charge of local police and other law enforcement and put down what is a modern-day Bolshevik revolution to overthrow the vision and creation of our Founding Fathers on July 4, 1776, in my birthplace and the country's birthplace of Philadelphia?! The answer to both questions is a resounding no!
Over the last weeks in particular, I have engaged in discussions with some of my self-professed conservative friends who continue to maintain that what the president is doing, or should I say not doing, in particular with regard to the violence in the streets, is politically shrewd. By putting the onus on local and state officials to quell the violence in major cities and then telling the American people that he must be asked to send federal forces in to lock up the "Bolsheviks," they cynically argue, The Donald is shrewdly harming the political prospects of not just Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, but all Democrats this fall. But cynical political ploys like this have not stopped the looting, burning, maiming and killings of not just the police, property and person, but ordinary citizens, including very young children!
Moreover, attacking the Chicoms with words and not deeds, and not instructing Attorney General Bill Barr, aka "Blowhard Bill," to freeze all Chinese assets to eventually pay for the destruction of our health and our economy over COVID-19, and then also not supporting Freedom Watch's class action suits in Dallas, Texas, seeking redress of the huge damage to the American people, is not presidential, but simply a cop out, pun intended.
Let me be clear, I, Larry Klayman, in my personal capacity will vote for Donald Trump to be reelected. Freedom Watch and I have been his de facto law firm for the last four years, as he was forced to endure the Russian collusion witch hunt and a phony impeachment.
That aside, President Trump must exercise real leadership during this perilous time if he hopes to be reelected, much more truly represent the interests of We the People.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
For instance, as pointed out recently by a real and highly distinguished conservative icon, Ambassador Alan Keyes, who not coincidentally penned the foreword to my new book, which can be pre-ordered on Amazon.com, "It Takes a Revolution: Forget the Scandal Industry," under the Insurrection Act of 1807, 10 U.S.C. 251-255 and 10 U.S.C. 331-335 ; amended 2006,2007, which is still on the books and can be implemented, President Trump can take control of even local law enforcement, notwithstanding the military, to put down an insurrection when state and local public officials fail to act.
The Insurrection Act, was signed into law by President Thomas Jefferson, interestingly, since my book is dedicated to this greatest of Founding Fathers and third American president. As explained recently by the History Channel:
"The Insurrection Act gives U.S. presidents the authority to deploy active military (and law enforcement) to maintain or restore peace in times of crisis. The Insurrection Act was invoked numerous times in the 20th century, most famously when Dwight D. Eisenhower sent the 101st Airborne Division to enforce the desegregation of public schools in Little Rock, Arkansas.
"But the origins of the Insurrection Act date back more than 200 years to a bizarre chapter in American history – when Aaron Burr plotted to raise an army and establish his own dynasty in either Louisiana or Mexico."
Yes, President Trump has done many good things – including most recently his peace initiative in the Middle East – but today we live in a country that is sinking faster than the Titanic, as the music plays on deck, entertaining the doomed ship's passengers as cable news does today. If our president does not act under these dire circumstances, and merely sends tweets and makes speeches threatening real action, the populace will lose any real faith in government that may be left after decades of corrupt rot.
And, President Trump will lose support among his electoral base as well as independents, support he dearly needs to be reelected.
My criticism is "tough love," not intended to put down the president, but to have him truly serve the interests of the American people. If he does this, surely he will continue as president of the United States, sparing We the People from the clownish, brain-dead if not totally stupid, far-left patsy Joe Biden and his evil and hate-filled vice-presidential pick, Kamala Harris.
Pre-order my new book "It Takes a Revolution: Forget the Scandal Industry!" at Amazon.com and all major booksellers online, and sign up for and support our class action against the Chicoms and other hard-hitting cases and citizens grand juries by going to www.freedomwatchusa.org.
And listen and take to heart my radio show this week, embedded below:


wnd--2020-09-25--The ugliness and upside of Trump Derangement Syndrome

With the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg , I did n't think it was possible for politics to get any crazier , but it has .
The left , predictably , is having a collective meltdown over the passing of RBG – not because she 's dead , but because she was inconsiderate enough to die when it might sabotage the progressive agenda .
To see what I mean , take a gander at the video below ( warning : obscene language ) : Now remember , it 's not as though someone else caught this woman during a bad @ @ @ @ @ @ @ car and deliberately recorded herself having this ridiculous temper tantrum , then put the video online .
Honestly , I do n't know whether to be horrified or amused .
She 's insane with hatred .
This is the `` deranged '' part of Trump Derangement Syndrome .
How does this cupcake function ?
How does her frothing-at-the-mouth hatred affect her health , her relationships , her career ?
Would you want this woman teaching your children ?
Providing your health care ?
Preparing or serving your food ?
In many ways , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – way beyond – mere hatred for Trump .
This tips into mental illness .
My criteria dividing those who are liberal with those who are deranged is the `` dinner test . ''
A dear family member , for example , is a confirmed liberal .
But while we disagree on issues , we can sit down for dinner , have a perfectly cordial discussion about various political topics , and rise up again still friends .
Now apply the `` dinner test '' to the woman in the video above .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ and attempted to have a cordial conversation about politics ?
I have a vision of smashed dishes , upended furniture and another screaming temper tantrum .
Or how about the suburban soccer mom for whom the death of RBG spurred her to join the Satanic Temple , since the Satanists are most likely to support abortion rights ?
( Well , yeah .
Duh . )
Or how about this weeping harpy who wishes she had been aborted because she 's so upset that Trump gets another Supreme Court pick ?
Clearly these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of crazy Trump Derangement Syndrome sufferers across the country , many of whom have expressed their political displeasure through anarchy .
In the belief that violence is a convincing voter-persuasion strategy , the Democratic Party has hitched its wagons to these domestic terrorists .
Trump supporter are in the cross-hairs of the Democrat foot soldiers .
There are so many examples of this , I ca n't possibly begin to list them .
Anyone who is n't screaming in fury or lifting a fist in solidarity is hunted down , called Nazis , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to attract or keep supporters ?
The sheer irrationality of the left is turning millions of voters away from the Democrats .
`` Over and over again , Trump has made it clear that he 's about improving life for ordinary Americans and protecting the country for all of us , '' writes Bruce Bawer in FrontPageMag .
`` Meanwhile , the Democrats have shown that they 're willing to kowtow to radicals , however violent , in order to win power and to take almost any position , however absurd , as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump 's . ''
Haunted by memories of 2016 , progressives everywhere are losing their minds at the thought of Trump appointing another Supreme Court justice , let alone winning the election .
But consider , no sane ( emphasis on sane ) person wants to be associated with lunatics like the ones featured above .
What the left ca n't – or wo n't – admit is their actions over the last four years have driven millions of voters in the opposite direction – including many Black , Latino , Asian and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democrat .
Shocking development : Sane people of every ethnicity and sexual orientation decry violence and anarchy .
The decades of Marxist indoctrination taking place in public schools and universities is now bearing fruit ( I can almost guarantee the women featured above were n't homeschooled ) as young people emerge from their educational years so utterly ignorant that they believe a system that has raised more people out of poverty over the last 250 years is inferior to a system that has killed at least 100 million people in the 20th century @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coverage by the mainstream media and voilà : apoplectic fits or born-again Satanists .
It 's important for Trump supporters to realize that most Democrats are impervious to logic or reason .
No matter how many times they 're warned that violence , chaos , intimidation , arson , murder , and screaming tantrums do n't work – they wo n't listen .
Instead , they ’ re cocooned in an echo chamber , only listening to people who agree with them .
`` Surrounded only by others like them , they assume @ @ @ @ @ @ @ least by the rest of the voters who might consider voting Democrat , mirror their ideas , '' observes Kyle Sammin in the Federalist .
But the Democrats are driving people away in droves .
Every time the left lurches further left , they leave behind the moderates who hate what their party has become .
Every time some screeching banshee loses it on TikTok , the moderates are shaking their heads and siding with the man who favors law and order and capitalism , not anarchy and murder and Marxism .
Every @ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` Death to America ! ''
the moderates move right .
Trump supporters are not necessarily Republicans .
Trump supporters are essentially third-party voters who support the Constitution .
So many people are turning to Trump because they have no choice but to vote against the party of insanity the left has become .
The difference between the two sides is this : Conservatives think it would be nice if progressives changed their minds .
Progressives want conservatives dead .
It 's been said the far left is nothing more than a right-wing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ maybe we should be applauding the screeching banshees in the above videos .
They 're helping our cause .
Make no mistake , Trump Derangement Syndrome will help reelect Trump in 2020 .
When the two strategies – a sound America-first administration versus frothing-at-the-mouth violence and hysteria – the choice is clear for most SANE Americans .
Then again , we have a lot of insane Americans like the cupcakes in the videos .
And that 's the problem .

With the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, I didn't think it was possible for politics to get any crazier, but it has.
The left, predictably, is having a collective meltdown over the passing of RBG – not because she's dead, but because she was inconsiderate enough to die when it might sabotage the progressive agenda. To see what I mean, take a gander at the video below (warning: obscene language):
Now remember, it's not as though someone else caught this woman during a bad moment. She's alone in her car and deliberately recorded herself having this ridiculous temper tantrum, then put the video online. Honestly, I don't know whether to be horrified or amused. She's insane with hatred. This is the "deranged" part of Trump Derangement Syndrome. How does this cupcake function? How does her frothing-at-the-mouth hatred affect her health, her relationships, her career?
Would you want this woman teaching your children? Providing your health care? Preparing or serving your food? In many ways, I pity her. This goes beyond – way beyond – mere hatred for Trump. This tips into mental illness.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
My criteria dividing those who are liberal with those who are deranged is the "dinner test." A dear family member, for example, is a confirmed liberal. But while we disagree on issues, we can sit down for dinner, have a perfectly cordial discussion about various political topics, and rise up again still friends.
Now apply the "dinner test" to the woman in the video above. What would happen if we sat down and attempted to have a cordial conversation about politics? I have a vision of smashed dishes, upended furniture and another screaming temper tantrum.
Or how about the suburban soccer mom for whom the death of RBG spurred her to join the Satanic Temple, since the Satanists are most likely to support abortion rights? (Well, yeah. Duh.) Or how about this weeping harpy who wishes she had been aborted because she's so upset that Trump gets another Supreme Court pick?
Clearly these unstable lunatics are just some of thousands of crazy Trump Derangement Syndrome sufferers across the country, many of whom have expressed their political displeasure through anarchy. In the belief that violence is a convincing voter-persuasion strategy, the Democratic Party has hitched its wagons to these domestic terrorists.
Trump supporters are in the cross-hairs of the Democrat foot soldiers. There are so many examples of this, I can't possibly begin to list them. Anyone who isn't screaming in fury or lifting a fist in solidarity is hunted down, called Nazis, even murdered. Is this the way to attract or keep supporters?
The sheer irrationality of the left is turning millions of voters away from the Democrats. "Over and over again, Trump has made it clear that he's about improving life for ordinary Americans and protecting the country for all of us," writes Bruce Bawer in FrontPageMag. "Meanwhile, the Democrats have shown that they're willing to kowtow to radicals, however violent, in order to win power and to take almost any position, however absurd, as long as it's the opposite of Trump's."
Haunted by memories of 2016, progressives everywhere are losing their minds at the thought of Trump appointing another Supreme Court justice, let alone winning the election. But consider, no sane (emphasis on sane) person wants to be associated with lunatics like the ones featured above.
What the left can't – or won't – admit is their actions over the last four years have driven millions of voters in the opposite direction – including many Black, Latino, Asian and gay voters who might otherwise have voted Democrat. Shocking development: Sane people of every ethnicity and sexual orientation decry violence and anarchy.
The decades of Marxist indoctrination taking place in public schools and universities is now bearing fruit (I can almost guarantee the women featured above weren't homeschooled) as young people emerge from their educational years so utterly ignorant that they believe a system that has raised more people out of poverty over the last 250 years is inferior to a system that has killed at least 100 million people in the 20th century alone. Toss in the constant negative coverage by the mainstream media and voilà: apoplectic fits or born-again Satanists.
It's important for Trump supporters to realize that most Democrats are impervious to logic or reason. No matter how many times they're warned that violence, chaos, intimidation, arson, murder, and screaming tantrums don't work – they won't listen.
Instead, they’re cocooned in an echo chamber, only listening to people who agree with them. "Surrounded only by others like them, they assume the rest of America, or at least by the rest of the voters who might consider voting Democrat, mirror their ideas," observes Kyle Sammin in the Federalist.
But the Democrats are driving people away in droves. Every time the left lurches further left, they leave behind the moderates who hate what their party has become. Every time some screeching banshee loses it on TikTok, the moderates are shaking their heads and siding with the man who favors law and order and capitalism, not anarchy and murder and Marxism. Every time domestic terrorists start fires and scream "Death to America!" the moderates move right.
Trump supporters are not necessarily Republicans. Trump supporters are essentially third-party voters who support the Constitution. So many people are turning to Trump because they have no choice but to vote against the party of insanity the left has become. The difference between the two sides is this: Conservatives think it would be nice if progressives changed their minds. Progressives want conservatives dead.
It's been said the far left is nothing more than a right-wing recruiting machine. What the heck, maybe we should be applauding the screeching banshees in the above videos. They're helping our cause.
Make no mistake, Trump Derangement Syndrome will help reelect Trump in 2020. When the two strategies – a sound America-first administration versus frothing-at-the-mouth violence and hysteria – the choice is clear for most SANE Americans.
Then again, we have a lot of insane Americans like the cupcakes in the videos. And that's the problem.
Patrice Lewis is pleased to announce the availability of the complete collection of 52 Country Living Series ebooklets, representing over 17 years of homesteading experience. Subjects include preparedness, frugality, rural skills, food preservation, and more. Click this link for details.