wnd--2020-11-10--If you believe Biden won, you've suspended reality

Anyone who factually believes Joe Biden won this election is a moron , a fool or both .
Common sense dictates no other options .
Not even Democrats and/or people in the Biden campaign believe he actually won .
The Biden camp enjoined with the Democrats and media are cheering that for the moment it appears the cheating has worked .
The socialist ideologues and anarchists are beside themselves with glee , but what happens if the truth prevails , i.e.
, there was massive voter fraud and corrupt counting practices on a level that 's beyond quantifying based upon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will the cheaters feel if they 're exposed and justice finally prevails ?
What if at long last those responsible for the political fraud that stripped honest Americans of their right to participate in non-rigged elections end up in handcuffs , ankle chains and federal prison jumpsuits , in prison vans going into federal courts ?
Biden is a stumbling bumbling reprobate liar who has spent his entire 47 years in political office attempting to make gain at the expense of taxpayers .
Despite his longevity in office , it was n't until @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the entire Biden family became flush with cash .
Hunter may be a crack-pipe junkie and a sexual molester of 14-year-old family members ( if we 're to believe what we 're being told was discovered on his computer hard drive ) , but he knew how to made money using daddy-Joe 's position .
Biden would be the first person elected to the office he covets chiefly by running television ads .
Practically every time Biden appeared in public he said something so profoundly absurd that even the dead people voting for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was the essence of Biden 's campaign .
Conversely , President Trump was making multiple campaign stops in multiple states right up to the morning of the election .
That would speak about the immeasurable gullibility of voters who believe Biden actually won the election .
TRENDING : Trump releases defiant statement as Biden and media declare victory , vows to fight To believe Biden legitimately won the election , one would need to suspend every connection to reality .
The truth is , President Trump must be removed from office by any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a scale that makes what John Kennedy did to Richard Nixon in 1960 pale in comparison .
Heretofore Kennedy 's winning the presidency with the aid of massive numbers of dead people voting was the gold standard of election cheating .
But , to the benefit of Biden , technology has advanced light years since 1960 .
President Trump had to be removed because the political elite and their wraith-like handlers , who operate from the shadows , were at eminent risk of having their corrupt political system destroyed .
If President Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ things he could accomplish would crush the arteries of globalist elites who are the constabulary of the titans who determine the ascendants to positions of power .
Donald J. Trump was/is a threat to everything to which past administrations were unwaveringly committed .
George Bush 41 , George Bush 43 and Barack Obama were proponents of globalism on a scale that surpasses anything Bill Clinton was open to .
Clinton was/is a pig ; but the Bush father and son , like Obama , were rabid in their pursuit to establish a one-world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not only interrupted the globalist agenda , he paved the way for more outsiders who were n't beholding to the moneychangers in the temple of politics .
Men and women like President Trump are n't dependent upon the secretive good ol ' boys in the shadows that until now decided both the winners and participants .
A person who is n't for sale is a threat to world the late Prescott Bush , Bill Gates et al .
envision .
President Trump said no to the World Health Organization , the Paris Agreement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of benefit to Americans .
He also has his eye upon the Federal Reserve to reign in the illegitimate power it wields .
He understands putting America and her people first , in a free society with the rights of the people protected by the people , was the primary reasoning of our Founding Fathers .
Ask yourself : Why would a person like George Soros invest more than $ 32 billion of his own money to force global open borders , and why would Bill Gates invest more than a quarter trillion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ health care charade , unless they expected an even greater return on their investments ?
President Trump presents a threat globalists can not abide .
Ergo , the determination was made that a stuttering , barely coherent corrupt politician becomes the Trojan Horse .
Anyone dumb enough to believe that globalist power-brokers , who believe it their divine right to craft the world in their image , are going to share their power or come under the control of the likes of the Halloween sisters ( Ayanna Pressley , Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez , Ilhan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of their kind is as clueless as anyone who believes Biden actually won the election .
If the true power-brokers are successful in removing President Trump , they certainly have a plan in place to dispatch the low-IQ half-a-commie wannabes boasting of their plans .
The globalist , one-world-order controllers can not afford four more years of President Trump .
We the people can not afford the next four years without President Trump .
This said and being true , the one thing I know that both groups fail to calculate in their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ throne , and if God wants Donald J. Trump to have four more years as president , there 's nothing anyone can do to prevent it .
Order Mychal Massie 's new book , `` I Feel the Presence of the Lord , '' a collection of devotions intended to encourage the reader to seek and see the Lord in every aspect of life .

Anyone who factually believes Joe Biden won this election is a moron, a fool or both. Common sense dictates no other options. Not even Democrats and/or people in the Biden campaign believe he actually won. The Biden camp enjoined with the Democrats and media are cheering that for the moment it appears the cheating has worked.
The socialist ideologues and anarchists are beside themselves with glee, but what happens if the truth prevails, i.e., there was massive voter fraud and corrupt counting practices on a level that's beyond quantifying based upon the scale of the cheating? How will the cheaters feel if they're exposed and justice finally prevails? What if at long last those responsible for the political fraud that stripped honest Americans of their right to participate in non-rigged elections end up in handcuffs, ankle chains and federal prison jumpsuits, in prison vans going into federal courts?
Biden is a stumbling bumbling reprobate liar who has spent his entire 47 years in political office attempting to make gain at the expense of taxpayers. Despite his longevity in office, it wasn't until his crack junkie son got involved that the entire Biden family became flush with cash. Hunter may be a crack-pipe junkie and a sexual molester of 14-year-old family members (if we're to believe what we're being told was discovered on his computer hard drive), but he knew how to made money using daddy-Joe's position.
Biden would be the first person elected to the office he covets chiefly by running television ads. Practically every time Biden appeared in public he said something so profoundly absurd that even the dead people voting for him grimaced. Voiceovers and slick editing was the essence of Biden's campaign.
Conversely, President Trump was making multiple campaign stops in multiple states right up to the morning of the election. That would speak about the immeasurable gullibility of voters who believe Biden actually won the election.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
To believe Biden legitimately won the election, one would need to suspend every connection to reality.
The truth is, President Trump must be removed from office by any means necessary, including election fraud on a scale that makes what John Kennedy did to Richard Nixon in 1960 pale in comparison. Heretofore Kennedy's winning the presidency with the aid of massive numbers of dead people voting was the gold standard of election cheating. But, to the benefit of Biden, technology has advanced light years since 1960.
President Trump had to be removed because the political elite and their wraith-like handlers, who operate from the shadows, were at eminent risk of having their corrupt political system destroyed. If President Trump were to receive another term, the things he could accomplish would crush the arteries of globalist elites who are the constabulary of the titans who determine the ascendants to positions of power.
Donald J. Trump was/is a threat to everything to which past administrations were unwaveringly committed. George Bush 41, George Bush 43 and Barack Obama were proponents of globalism on a scale that surpasses anything Bill Clinton was open to.
Clinton was/is a pig; but the Bush father and son, like Obama, were rabid in their pursuit to establish a one-world global government and economy. President Trump not only interrupted the globalist agenda, he paved the way for more outsiders who weren't beholding to the moneychangers in the temple of politics. Men and women like President Trump aren't dependent upon the secretive good ol' boys in the shadows that until now decided both the winners and participants. A person who isn't for sale is a threat to world the late Prescott Bush, Bill Gates et al. envision.
President Trump said no to the World Health Organization, the Paris Agreement and numerous other involvements that weren't of benefit to Americans. He also has his eye upon the Federal Reserve to reign in the illegitimate power it wields. He understands putting America and her people first, in a free society with the rights of the people protected by the people, was the primary reasoning of our Founding Fathers.
Ask yourself: Why would a person like George Soros invest more than $32 billion of his own money to force global open borders, and why would Bill Gates invest more than a quarter trillion dollars of his money in the global health care charade, unless they expected an even greater return on their investments?
President Trump presents a threat globalists cannot abide. Ergo, the determination was made that a stuttering, barely coherent corrupt politician becomes the Trojan Horse.
Anyone dumb enough to believe that globalist power-brokers, who believe it their divine right to craft the world in their image, are going to share their power or come under the control of the likes of the Halloween sisters (Ayanna Pressley, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib) and others of their kind is as clueless as anyone who believes Biden actually won the election.
If the true power-brokers are successful in removing President Trump, they certainly have a plan in place to dispatch the low-IQ half-a-commie wannabes boasting of their plans.
The globalist, one-world-order controllers cannot afford four more years of President Trump. We the people cannot afford the next four years without President Trump.
This said and being true, the one thing I know that both groups fail to calculate in their formulas is that God is on His throne, and if God wants Donald J. Trump to have four more years as president, there's nothing anyone can do to prevent it.
Order Mychal Massie's new book, "I Feel the Presence of the Lord," a collection of devotions intended to encourage the reader to seek and see the Lord in every aspect of life.


wnd--2020-11-10--Why SCOTUS will vindicate Trump's victory

The United States is a constitutional republic with limited democratic components , but is not a democracy .
While both forms of government are systems of citizen self-rule , pure democracy means majority rules in all things .
Sounds great until you find yourself shipwrecked on Cannibal Island just in time for the vote on whom to eat for dinner , or ( similarly ) you 're a certain presidential candidate illegally locked out of the vote counting process in heavily Democrat-majority cities with proven histories of election fraud .
In contrast , our constitutional republic vests its authority in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Bible , which had been elucidated and codified in British Common Law over centuries and were expressly adopted by our founders in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution .
The Electoral College , the allocation of representation in Congress , laws protecting election integrity and our right to petition the government with our grievances about these matters are all rooted in those legal principles .
It is this body of principles that define the Rule of Law and distinguishes it from the Rule of Man .
It is essentially the difference @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Will of Man : a truth reflected in John Adam 's famous assertion , `` Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people .
It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other . ''
The Rule of Man , however , follows only one principle – that `` Might Makes Right , '' and it defines `` right '' by whatever the ruling power wants it to be .
Thus , in America , the Rule of Law is NOT about `` following statutes '' that have been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ statutes merely codify the will of the powerful and do not necessarily comport with the legal principles of the Constitution .
TRENDING : Trump releases defiant statement as Biden and media declare victory , vows to fight This brings me to the matter of Democrat-controlled states `` legalizing '' universal ballot mail-outs , and post-Election Day acceptance of ballots .
I am firmly convinced that the main purpose of this change was to increase the number of `` unclaimed '' ballots available to be `` harvested '' by the Democratic voter fraud machines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this is a `` conspiracy theory '' in the truest sense of the word , but that does n't mean it is n't true .
I ( along with millions of my fellow constitutionalists ) am in fact alleging conspiracy .
Now , in response to this well-founded theory , and the ever growing body of evidence in support of it , much has been made by critics of the president that the evidence is not sufficient to prove that election fraud was committed .
As an attorney , I believe that it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of argument , let 's say they 're right .
My answer is `` So what ? ''
This is n't ( at this stage ) a criminal trial where we must prove our case `` beyond a reasonable doubt '' or even establish `` clear and convincing evidence . ''
We need only establish sufficient evidence to justify an official investigation .
Everyone should be familiar with this very low standard because it was used to justify the appointment of a special counsel to investigate President Trump in the Russian Collusion Hoax @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of criminal conspiracy ( in fact zero proof ) than we have now against the Democrats .
Frankly , investigations for criminal conspiracy usually must proceed on limited evidence because of the secretive nature of this type of crime .
In Philadelphia , Pittsburgh , Detroit , Milwaukee and other voter fraud crime scenes , the left clearly believe they can get away with their ballot stuffing by ensuring no one can get close enough to witness what they 're actually doing in the counting rooms .
And they may or may not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a case by case basis , because of the standards of proof in the courtroom .
But what we want at this point ( at the very least ) is not a conviction of individuals but the electoral equivalent of a mistrial – the legal requirement for that being merely `` serious procedural error or misconduct '' generally .
That standard is met on its face in their refusal to allow meaningful access by pro-Trump observers , in at least one case directly defying a court order .
Additionally , there is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in civil tort law that has a corollary in deciding logically whether a conspiracy theory merits investigation .
The old legal term for this is the Latin phrase res ipsa loquitur , `` the thing speaks for itself . ''
Or to translate this into the common vernacular , `` it does n't pass the smell test . ''
However , as confident as I am that President Trump would win a re-do of the election in these key states , if such were ordered , that would not be the best outcome @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the election process itself will be permanently undermined if the bad policies at issue are not struck down .
Least helpful would be recounts , which can not stop this particular type of fraud because the mail-in ballots have been separated from the envelopes they arrived , envelopes that bear the only identifying information about the voters .
( Yes , you can show the envelope is `` from '' a dead person , but that does n't help in adjusting the vote tally either way . )
The best outcome ( which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the simple invalidation of all ballots received after the close of the polls on election night .
I hope but do n't expect the court to set a clear uniform standard for future elections that minimizes the potential for fraud .
Both of these are clearly within the power of the court and consistent with constitutional originalism .
Returning to the problem of the Rule of Man ; the most destructive form of it is communism – purporting to be pure democracy ( which is bad enough ) , but always forced upon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or ethical restraint and ultimately vesting power in a tiny elite of dictatorial tyrants .
( Sound familiar ? )
Reportedly , the Democrats are `` chastened '' by their election losses in Congress attributed to their open advocacy of communist policies .
This notion they 've `` learned their lesson and will govern as moderates '' is a GOP establishment head-fake to minimize the significance of a Trump loss .
Without SCOTUS intervention for Trump , Harris , Biden and Pelosi would continue in the same direction set by Obama and Clinton @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one in the GOP but Trump has the backbone to stop them .

The United States is a constitutional republic with limited democratic components, but is not a democracy. While both forms of government are systems of citizen self-rule, pure democracy means majority rules in all things. Sounds great until you find yourself shipwrecked on Cannibal Island just in time for the vote on whom to eat for dinner, or (similarly) you're a certain presidential candidate illegally locked out of the vote counting process in heavily Democrat-majority cities with proven histories of election fraud.
In contrast, our constitutional republic vests its authority in the legal principles established by God in the Bible, which had been elucidated and codified in British Common Law over centuries and were expressly adopted by our founders in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. The Electoral College, the allocation of representation in Congress, laws protecting election integrity and our right to petition the government with our grievances about these matters are all rooted in those legal principles.
It is this body of principles that define the Rule of Law and distinguishes it from the Rule of Man. It is essentially the difference between the Will of God and the Will of Man: a truth reflected in John Adam's famous assertion, "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."
The Rule of Man, however, follows only one principle – that "Might Makes Right," and it defines "right" by whatever the ruling power wants it to be.
Thus, in America, the Rule of Law is NOT about "following statutes" that have been established by the governing authorities, since statutes merely codify the will of the powerful and do not necessarily comport with the legal principles of the Constitution.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
This brings me to the matter of Democrat-controlled states "legalizing" universal ballot mail-outs, and post-Election Day acceptance of ballots. I am firmly convinced that the main purpose of this change was to increase the number of "unclaimed" ballots available to be "harvested" by the Democratic voter fraud machines in the swing states.
Obviously, this is a "conspiracy theory" in the truest sense of the word, but that doesn't mean it isn't true. I (along with millions of my fellow constitutionalists) am in fact alleging conspiracy.
Now, in response to this well-founded theory, and the ever growing body of evidence in support of it, much has been made by critics of the president that the evidence is not sufficient to prove that election fraud was committed.
As an attorney, I believe that it is, but purely for the sake of argument, let's say they're right. My answer is "So what?" This isn't (at this stage) a criminal trial where we must prove our case "beyond a reasonable doubt" or even establish "clear and convincing evidence." We need only establish sufficient evidence to justify an official investigation. Everyone should be familiar with this very low standard because it was used to justify the appointment of a special counsel to investigate President Trump in the Russian Collusion Hoax. His enemies had far less proof of criminal conspiracy (in fact zero proof) than we have now against the Democrats.
Frankly, investigations for criminal conspiracy usually must proceed on limited evidence because of the secretive nature of this type of crime.
In Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Detroit, Milwaukee and other voter fraud crime scenes, the left clearly believe they can get away with their ballot stuffing by ensuring no one can get close enough to witness what they're actually doing in the counting rooms. And they may or may not be correct as to individual culpability on a case by case basis, because of the standards of proof in the courtroom.
But what we want at this point (at the very least) is not a conviction of individuals but the electoral equivalent of a mistrial – the legal requirement for that being merely "serious procedural error or misconduct" generally. That standard is met on its face in their refusal to allow meaningful access by pro-Trump observers, in at least one case directly defying a court order.
Additionally, there is a common law legal principle still heavily used in civil tort law that has a corollary in deciding logically whether a conspiracy theory merits investigation. The old legal term for this is the Latin phrase res ipsa loquitur, "the thing speaks for itself." Or to translate this into the common vernacular, "it doesn't pass the smell test."
However, as confident as I am that President Trump would win a re-do of the election in these key states, if such were ordered, that would not be the best outcome in this situation because the integrity of the election process itself will be permanently undermined if the bad policies at issue are not struck down. Least helpful would be recounts, which cannot stop this particular type of fraud because the mail-in ballots have been separated from the envelopes they arrived, envelopes that bear the only identifying information about the voters. (Yes, you can show the envelope is "from" a dead person, but that doesn't help in adjusting the vote tally either way.)
The best outcome (which I expect to occur) would be the simple invalidation of all ballots received after the close of the polls on election night. I hope but don't expect the court to set a clear uniform standard for future elections that minimizes the potential for fraud. Both of these are clearly within the power of the court and consistent with constitutional originalism.
Returning to the problem of the Rule of Man; the most destructive form of it is communism – purporting to be pure democracy (which is bad enough), but always forced upon nations by violent mobs with no moral or ethical restraint and ultimately vesting power in a tiny elite of dictatorial tyrants. (Sound familiar?) Reportedly, the Democrats are "chastened" by their election losses in Congress attributed to their open advocacy of communist policies. This notion they've "learned their lesson and will govern as moderates" is a GOP establishment head-fake to minimize the significance of a Trump loss. Without SCOTUS intervention for Trump, Harris, Biden and Pelosi would continue in the same direction set by Obama and Clinton as fast as possible – and no one in the GOP but Trump has the backbone to stop them.


wnd--2020-11-10--Mathematical evidence the election was stolen

Seizing dictatorial powers in Iraq in 1979 and declaring himself president , Saddam Hussein held two referendums , in 1995 and 2002 , to show the world he had his people 's `` popular support . ''
Voters were simply asked to respond `` yes '' or `` no '' to the question , `` Do you approve of President Saddam Hussein being the President of the Republic ? ''
Of 8.4 million votes cast in 1995 , Saddam won 99.96 % .
In 2002 , he did better , hitting 100 % – not a single `` no '' @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been impressed with such sham results , but the world community was not .
Whether 0.04 % of the 1995 electorate courageously voted `` no '' or Saddam just felt obligated to tally a few negative votes to make the results more palatable is unknown .
If the former , brave souls will express disapproval even in a brutal dictatorship .
An incident occurring during our own presidential election suggests a similar heavy-handedness .
In Wisconsin , late into the night of Nov. 3/early morning hours of Nov. 4 , President Donald Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to report in with results by 1 a.m. on the 4th ; 2 a.m. and 3 a.m. passed without the results .
Finally , at 3:30 a.m. , the vote tally arrived .
All incoming votes went to Democrat Joe Biden ; none to Trump .
In 1995 , not even Saddam proved that brazen .
Something highly unusual happened that morning at several voting centers , not only in Wisconsin , but in Michigan and Pennsylvania as well .
In Wisconsin , 140,000 mail-in ballots were found ; in Michigan another 200,000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all for Biden .
TRENDING : Trump releases defiant statement as Biden and media declare victory , vows to fight Supposedly the party of science , Democrats have lambasted Republicans for failing to heed it .
Perhaps , then , the science of math provides the best explanation to understand what happened in these three states .
A statistical analysis , laying out the chances of such one-sided Biden ballot dumps occurring , leads to but one conclusion : undeniable mathematical evidence the election was stolen .
Analysts say statistically it is impossible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden the way they did .
It is a virtual statistical impossibility – the odds being 0.00000189 % or 1 in almost 53 million .
In a national election demonstrating a close split in popular vote between two presidential candidates , how could so many last minute pro-Biden votes materialize wiping out Trump 's lead ?
Also registering as a questionable actor in Pennsylvania 's shenanigans was Democratic Attorney General Josh Shapiro .
The day before the election he tweeted Trump would lose his state if `` all the votes are added up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ law enforcement official , Shapiro irresponsibly suggested a Trump win to be illegitimate , only occurring by voter suppression of Democrats .
Despite Shapiro 's call , Trump established a substantial lead in Pennsylvania when suddenly the surge of Biden votes arrived .
Apparently , these were among `` all the votes '' Shapiro needed to be `` added up . ''
Numerous reports , about illegal votes counted or legal ones not , continue pouring in .
It may take a village to raise a child , but it also takes a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the jaws of defeat .
It appears many such villagers worked , most notably in Pennsylvania , to do so on Biden 's behalf .
These incidents represent just the tip of the voting fraud iceberg : • In Texas , social worker Kelly Brunner was charged with 134 felony criminal counts for submitting voter registration applications for mentally disabled residents at a government-run facility without authorization to do so .
• In a Michigan county , a software glitch switched 6,000 Republican votes to Democrat , necessitating a hand count .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ counties across the state .
A similar glitch was discovered in Georgia .
A total of 28 states use the software .
• Several arrests of postal workers were made for failing to deliver ballots with which they were entrusted , one caught while fleeing to Canada .
• A Pennsylvania postal worker signed an affidavit alleging ballots received after Election Day were backdated , supported by video evidence .
• In Philadelphia , Democrats threatened to stop counting if Republicans were allowed to observe , even after a judge authorized it .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ was `` troubling . ''
If an election is being conducted fairly , why should there be any objection to observers having access ?
• An observer in Pennsylvania noted the number of votes cast was greater than the number of people entering the voting station .
• A Philadelphia poll watcher ( registered Democrat ) reported `` there is corruption at the highest levels , '' adding , `` I ca n't believe what I 'm seeing – this is a coup . ''
• Overseeing the Pennsylvania vote count was its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a known Trump-hater .
At one point , with 86 % of the vote counted and Trump leading by 400,000 , Boockvar issued confusing guidance .
Meanwhile , Deputy Elections Secretary Jonathan Marks violated the state ethics code by providing information on rejected mail ballots to Democratic Party operatives .
• In Pennsylvania , at least 21,000 ballots were cast by deceased voters .
Any hope of Trump retaining the Oval Office rests on irrefutable proof of voting fraud .
Keeping in mind we live in an era where first impression news stories @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are saying evidence of massive voter fraud is being assembled , arrests of several players in the voting scam will follow and the proof will be damning .
Allegedly , this evidence involves fraudulent use of ballots identified as part of a sting operation .
The Trump administration supposedly had all legal ballots secretly imprinted with invisible watermarks in unbreakable code .
A scan so far of 14 million ballots in five states reflect an 80 % failure rate – all Biden votes .
The 16th century English playwright William Shakespeare coined the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the state of Denmark , '' connoting massive political corruption in that kingdom .
Who would have thought more than four centuries later the stench of corruption would plague America as well ?

Seizing dictatorial powers in Iraq in 1979 and declaring himself president, Saddam Hussein held two referendums, in 1995 and 2002, to show the world he had his people's "popular support." Voters were simply asked to respond "yes" or "no" to the question, "Do you approve of President Saddam Hussein being the President of the Republic?" Of 8.4 million votes cast in 1995, Saddam won 99.96%. In 2002, he did better, hitting 100% – not a single "no" vote was registered. Saddam may have been impressed with such sham results, but the world community was not.
Whether 0.04% of the 1995 electorate courageously voted "no" or Saddam just felt obligated to tally a few negative votes to make the results more palatable is unknown. If the former, brave souls will express disapproval even in a brutal dictatorship.
An incident occurring during our own presidential election suggests a similar heavy-handedness.
In Wisconsin, late into the night of Nov. 3/early morning hours of Nov. 4, President Donald Trump enjoyed a comfortable lead. Milwaukee was to report in with results by 1 a.m. on the 4th; 2 a.m. and 3 a.m. passed without the results. Finally, at 3:30 a.m., the vote tally arrived. All incoming votes went to Democrat Joe Biden; none to Trump. In 1995, not even Saddam proved that brazen.
Something highly unusual happened that morning at several voting centers, not only in Wisconsin, but in Michigan and Pennsylvania as well. In Wisconsin, 140,000 mail-in ballots were found ; in Michigan another 200,000; and in Pennsylvania, 1,000,000 – all for Biden.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
Supposedly the party of science, Democrats have lambasted Republicans for failing to heed it. Perhaps, then, the science of math provides the best explanation to understand what happened in these three states. A statistical analysis, laying out the chances of such one-sided Biden ballot dumps occurring, leads to but one conclusion: undeniable mathematical evidence the election was stolen. Analysts say statistically it is impossible for those states to have flipped to Biden the way they did. It is a virtual statistical impossibility – the odds being 0.00000189% or 1 in almost 53 million.
In a national election demonstrating a close split in popular vote between two presidential candidates, how could so many last minute pro-Biden votes materialize wiping out Trump's lead?
Also registering as a questionable actor in Pennsylvania's shenanigans was Democratic Attorney General Josh Shapiro. The day before the election he tweeted Trump would lose his state if "all the votes are added up. …" As Pennsylvania's highest-ranking law enforcement official, Shapiro irresponsibly suggested a Trump win to be illegitimate, only occurring by voter suppression of Democrats.
Despite Shapiro's call, Trump established a substantial lead in Pennsylvania when suddenly the surge of Biden votes arrived. Apparently, these were among "all the votes" Shapiro needed to be "added up."
Numerous reports, about illegal votes counted or legal ones not, continue pouring in. It may take a village to raise a child, but it also takes a village to snatch a presidential election victory from the jaws of defeat. It appears many such villagers worked, most notably in Pennsylvania, to do so on Biden's behalf. These incidents represent just the tip of the voting fraud iceberg:
In Texas, social worker Kelly Brunner was charged with 134 felony criminal counts for submitting voter registration applications for mentally disabled residents at a government-run facility without authorization to do so.
In a Michigan county, a software glitch switched 6,000 Republican votes to Democrat, necessitating a hand count. The software was used in 47 other counties across the state. A similar glitch was discovered in Georgia. A total of 28 states use the software.
Several arrests of postal workers were made for failing to deliver ballots with which they were entrusted, one caught while fleeing to Canada.
A Pennsylvania postal worker signed an affidavit alleging ballots received after Election Day were backdated, supported by video evidence.
In Philadelphia, Democrats threatened to stop counting if Republicans were allowed to observe, even after a judge authorized it. A former Clinton senior adviser admitted this was "troubling." If an election is being conducted fairly, why should there be any objection to observers having access?
An observer in Pennsylvania noted the number of votes cast was greater than the number of people entering the voting station.
A Philadelphia poll watcher (registered Democrat) reported "there is corruption at the highest levels," adding, "I can't believe what I'm seeing – this is a coup."
Overseeing the Pennsylvania vote count was its secretary of state, Kathy Boockvar, a known Trump-hater. At one point, with 86% of the vote counted and Trump leading by 400,000, Boockvar issued confusing guidance. Meanwhile, Deputy Elections Secretary Jonathan Marks violated the state ethics code by providing information on rejected mail ballots to Democratic Party operatives.
In Pennsylvania, at least 21,000 ballots were cast by deceased voters.
Any hope of Trump retaining the Oval Office rests on irrefutable proof of voting fraud. Keeping in mind we live in an era where first impression news stories have proven inaccurate, some Trump confidants are saying evidence of massive voter fraud is being assembled, arrests of several players in the voting scam will follow and the proof will be damning. Allegedly, this evidence involves fraudulent use of ballots identified as part of a sting operation. The Trump administration supposedly had all legal ballots secretly imprinted with invisible watermarks in unbreakable code. A scan so far of 14 million ballots in five states reflect an 80% failure rate – all Biden votes.
The 16th century English playwright William Shakespeare coined the phrase, "Something is rotten in the state of Denmark," connoting massive political corruption in that kingdom. Who would have thought more than four centuries later the stench of corruption would plague America as well?


wnd--2020-11-10--Islamists behead more than 50 people in Mozambique

( YAHOO ) -- More than 50 people have been beheaded in northern Mozambique by militant Islamists , state media @ @ @ @ @ a football pitch in a village into an `` execution ground '' , where they @ @ @ @ @ other reports said .
Several people were also beheaded in another village , state media @ @

(YAHOO) -- More than 50 people have been beheaded in northern Mozambique by militant Islamists, state media report.
The militants turned a football pitch in a village into an "execution ground", where they decapitated and chopped bodies, other reports said.
Several people were also beheaded in another village, state media reported.
Read the full story ›


wnd--2020-11-10--Lindsey Graham accuses Pennsylvania of balloting harvesting in nursing homes

( WASHINGTON EXAMINER ) -- Sen. Lindsey Graham said on Monday he has learned about potential ballot harvesting in Pennsylvania @ @ @ @ @ of the Senate Judiciary Committee revealed that there were up to 25,000 cases that are @ @ @ @ @ remains a state President Trump 's team hopes to turn its way after major media @ @ @ @ @ Democratic opponent , Joe Biden , giving him enough electoral votes to secure the presidency @ @ @ @ @ got more information .
We 're now finding potentially that 25,000 nursing home residents in @ @ @ @ @ ballots at the exact same time , '' the South Carolina Republican said on Fox @ @

(WASHINGTON EXAMINER) -- Sen. Lindsey Graham said on Monday he has learned about potential ballot harvesting in Pennsylvania nursing homes.
The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee revealed that there were up to 25,000 cases that are being looked at as Pennsylvania remains a state President Trump's team hopes to turn its way after major media outlets called it for his Democratic opponent, Joe Biden, giving him enough electoral votes to secure the presidency.
"I’ve got more information. We're now finding potentially that 25,000 nursing home residents in different nursing homes requested mail-in ballots at the exact same time," the South Carolina Republican said on Fox News.
Read the full story ›


wnd--2020-11-10--Quarter million voted in Wisconsin while ignoring ID requirement

( WASHINGTON EXAMINER ) -- MADISON , Wisconsin — Republicans in Wisconsin are raising questions about the large number of @ @ @ @ @ , who avoided having to show a photo ID to vote by listing themselves as @ @ @ @ @ requesting an absentee ballot , Wisconsin law allows voters to self-certify if they are “ @ @ @ @ @ residence because of age , physical illness , or are disabled for an indefinite period @ @ @ @ @ allows them to submit an absentee ballot without having to show any form of photo @ @ @ @ @ have a ballot witness sign off .
This year , the number of indefinitely confined @ @ @ @ @ pandemic , leaving Republicans saying they are concerned about potential fraud .
In 2019 , @ @ @ @ @ were indefinitely confined .
That number reportedly ballooned to 243,000 this year .

(WASHINGTON EXAMINER) -- MADISON, Wisconsin — Republicans in Wisconsin are raising questions about the large number of people, particularly new voters, who avoided having to show a photo ID to vote by listing themselves as “indefinitely confined.”
When requesting an absentee ballot, Wisconsin law allows voters to self-certify if they are “indefinitely confined” to their residence because of age, physical illness, or are disabled for an indefinite period of time. Doing so allows them to submit an absentee ballot without having to show any form of photo ID, although they must have a ballot witness sign off.
This year, the number of indefinitely confined voters soared amid the coronavirus pandemic, leaving Republicans saying they are concerned about potential fraud. In 2019, about 72,000 voters said they were indefinitely confined. That number reportedly ballooned to 243,000 this year.
Read the full story ›


wnd--2020-11-10--11 observations in a dark time

11 observations in a dark time

As there is too much to say in the space of one column , I will simply offer some thoughts on the state of the country a week after the 2020 elections .
No .
1 : While I am not certain the reported election results are dishonest , I suspect they are .
Worse , about half this country believes this , too .
This is unprecedented in American history .
One might counter that this is not unprecedented , that this was precisely what half the American electorate felt in 2000 , when many Democrats rejected the 2000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ counting .
But that was entirely different .
No one alleged widespread Republican fraud in the election of George W. Bush .
The issue in that extremely close election involved a faulty voting system that resulted in hand recounts using differing ballot-counting standards from one jurisdiction to the next .
Liberal justices joined the 7-2 vote in ruling for Bush that the recounts could not constitutionally go forward .
Therefore , the fact that nearly half the country is far from certain that Joe Biden was honestly elected is unprecedented .
TRENDING : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ' implementation of National Defense Strategy Half this country believes , with good reason , that if Democratic Party officials believe they can get away with cheating , they will do so .
Aside from the Democrats having a history of ballot-manipulation , there is an even more compelling reason to believe Democrats would cheat .
For four years , they have been telling the nation and telling one another that President Donald Trump is a dictator , a fascist and a white supremacist .
Therefore , if a leftist considers himself a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ results , and he can help prevent the reelection of a white supremacist fascist dictator , would n't he do so ?
Would n't he be morally obligated to do so ?
No .
2 : For four years , the mainstream print and electronic media waged daily , indeed hourly , vicious attacks on Trump as a human being .
Rarely did they attack his policies , since they were so beneficial to America ( some of the greatest economic figures in memory and the lowest black unemployment rate ever recorded ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ weakening of Iran and a major strengthening of Israel and Israel-Arab peace ) .
Worse , the media and the Democratic Party immersed the country in a three-year lie about Trump campaign collusion with Russia .
Yet , 70 million Americans still voted for Trump .
The Democrats lost seats in the House and will probably not gain control of the Senate , despite the larger number of Republican incumbents who were up for reelection .
Americans watched Democratic governors and mayors do nothing as left-wing thugs burned their cities .
And then @ @ @ @ @ @ @ defund their police departments .
That is one reason Democrats fared so badly .
No .
3 : The mainstream media are now perceived as fraudulent by half of America .
This has never been the case .
But from The New York Times ' mendacious claim that America 's true founding was in 1619 and was founded in order to preserve slavery – for which the equally dishonest Pulitzer Prize committee awarded the paper a Pulitzer Prize – to the entire mainstream press 's ignoring of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media .
No .
4 : That is one reason the tech companies shut down conservative voices .
The more people hear nonleft ideas , the more they gravitate away from the left .
As a result , for the first time in American history , free speech is seriously threatened – not by government , but by private companies .
Free speech is the most important freedom of all .
If we lose it , it is the end of our country .
What may happen then is the division of America @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two nations , each with its own media and its own schools .
No .
5 : Despite four years of being accused of racism and xenophobia , Trump increased both his black and Latino vote .
If Trump lost honestly , it was due to his loss of the white male vote – from +31 in 2016 to +23 in 2020 .
No .
6 : The Democratic Party was once liberal .
It is now leftist .
And the left , everywhere in the world , suppresses dissent wherever it takes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ American university to Twitter and the rest of Big Tech .
No .
7 : Liberals loved America .
The left loathes it .
Therefore , since the left governs American education , America-hatred dominates the education system from kindergarten to graduate school .
You are risking the poisoning of your children 's minds , souls and consciences by sending them to most American schools and nearly all American colleges .
Do n't .
Home-school , or find a school that teaches rather than indoctrinates .
No .
8 : Hydroxychloroquine , one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to man , when given with zinc to almost anyone as soon as the individual develops symptoms or tests positive with COVID-19 , prevents death and even hospitalization in the overwhelming majority of cases .
History will likely note that the politicians and scientists who opposed hydroxychloroquine have a lot of blood on their hands .
No .
9 : Those who can work from home are far more likely to support lockdowns than those who can not work from home .
As a rule , the former are more likely to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than the latter .
No .
10 : All over the country , stores in big cities were boarded up solely to protect themselves from left-wing rioters should Trump have won .
When Biden was declared the winner , the boards came down .
Because everyone knows that conservatives do n't riot .
No .
11 : If Biden wins , more and more nonleft Americans will lose their reputations , their businesses and their freedom to speak .
All of which plausibly renders the Georgia runoffs for U.S. senator the most important @ @ @ @ @

As there is too much to say in the space of one column, I will simply offer some thoughts on the state of the country a week after the 2020 elections.
No. 1: While I am not certain the reported election results are dishonest, I suspect they are. Worse, about half this country believes this, too.
This is unprecedented in American history.
One might counter that this is not unprecedented, that this was precisely what half the American electorate felt in 2000, when many Democrats rejected the 2000 Supreme Court decision regarding Florida's ballot counting. But that was entirely different. No one alleged widespread Republican fraud in the election of George W. Bush. The issue in that extremely close election involved a faulty voting system that resulted in hand recounts using differing ballot-counting standards from one jurisdiction to the next. Liberal justices joined the 7-2 vote in ruling for Bush that the recounts could not constitutionally go forward.
Therefore, the fact that nearly half the country is far from certain that Joe Biden was honestly elected is unprecedented.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
Half this country believes, with good reason, that if Democratic Party officials believe they can get away with cheating, they will do so. Aside from the Democrats having a history of ballot-manipulation, there is an even more compelling reason to believe Democrats would cheat. For four years, they have been telling the nation and telling one another that President Donald Trump is a dictator, a fascist and a white supremacist. Therefore, if a leftist considers himself a moral individual and works in tabulating election results, and he can help prevent the reelection of a white supremacist fascist dictator, wouldn't he do so? Wouldn't he be morally obligated to do so?
No. 2: For four years, the mainstream print and electronic media waged daily, indeed hourly, vicious attacks on Trump as a human being. Rarely did they attack his policies, since they were so beneficial to America (some of the greatest economic figures in memory and the lowest black unemployment rate ever recorded) and to the world (a major weakening of Iran and a major strengthening of Israel and Israel-Arab peace). Worse, the media and the Democratic Party immersed the country in a three-year lie about Trump campaign collusion with Russia.
Yet, 70 million Americans still voted for Trump. The Democrats lost seats in the House and will probably not gain control of the Senate, despite the larger number of Republican incumbents who were up for reelection.
Americans watched Democratic governors and mayors do nothing as left-wing thugs burned their cities. And then they watched Democratic mayors and city councils defund their police departments. That is one reason Democrats fared so badly.
No. 3: The mainstream media are now perceived as fraudulent by half of America. This has never been the case. But from The New York Times' mendacious claim that America's true founding was in 1619 and was founded in order to preserve slavery – for which the equally dishonest Pulitzer Prize committee awarded the paper a Pulitzer Prize – to the entire mainstream press's ignoring of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal, only left-wing Americans now believe the mainstream media.
No. 4: That is one reason the tech companies shut down conservative voices. The more people hear nonleft ideas, the more they gravitate away from the left. As a result, for the first time in American history, free speech is seriously threatened – not by government, but by private companies. Free speech is the most important freedom of all. If we lose it, it is the end of our country. What may happen then is the division of America, either formally or informally, into two nations, each with its own media and its own schools.
No. 5: Despite four years of being accused of racism and xenophobia, Trump increased both his black and Latino vote. If Trump lost honestly, it was due to his loss of the white male vote – from +31 in 2016 to +23 in 2020.
No. 6: The Democratic Party was once liberal. It is now leftist. And the left, everywhere in the world, suppresses dissent wherever it takes over – from Lenin to the modern American university to Twitter and the rest of Big Tech.
No. 7: Liberals loved America. The left loathes it. Therefore, since the left governs American education, America-hatred dominates the education system from kindergarten to graduate school. You are risking the poisoning of your children's minds, souls and consciences by sending them to most American schools and nearly all American colleges. Don't. Home-school, or find a school that teaches rather than indoctrinates.
No. 8: Hydroxychloroquine, one of the safest and oldest medications known to man, when given with zinc to almost anyone as soon as the individual develops symptoms or tests positive with COVID-19, prevents death and even hospitalization in the overwhelming majority of cases. History will likely note that the politicians and scientists who opposed hydroxychloroquine have a lot of blood on their hands.
No. 9: Those who can work from home are far more likely to support lockdowns than those who cannot work from home. As a rule, the former are more likely to be Democrats and more likely to be wealthier than the latter.
No. 10: All over the country, stores in big cities were boarded up solely to protect themselves from left-wing rioters should Trump have won. When Biden was declared the winner, the boards came down. Because everyone knows that conservatives don't riot.
No. 11: If Biden wins, more and more nonleft Americans will lose their reputations, their businesses and their freedom to speak.
All of which plausibly renders the Georgia runoffs for U.S. senator the most important elections in American history.


wnd--2020-11-11--Decision Desk HQ calls North Carolina for Trump

One week after America went to the polls , a new projection has said President Donald Trump will win the battleground state of North Carolina .
`` Decision Desk HQ Projects Trump ( R ) Has Won The State Of NC And Its 15 Electoral Votes Race Called At 11-10 1:41 PM , '' Decision Desk HQ tweeted Tuesday .
The Associated Press has not yet called the race .
TRENDING : Giuliani : Trump campaign has the evidence to change Pennsylvania election results Current results from across the nation give presumptive potential president-elect Joe Biden the edge , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by several media organizations .
Trump has challenged results in a post-election legal battle that remains unresolved .
North Carolina has 15 electoral votes , votes that Trump could need if his challenges in Michigan , Pennsylvania and other states succeed .
Trump currently leads Biden by 73,300 votes in North Carolina , according to the Fayetteville Observer .
“ If I were the Biden folks , I would right North Carolina off , and I think they have , ” said Susan Roberts , a political scientist at Davidson College .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ estimated that 144,000 potential ballots still to be counted .
That includes 93,000 mail-in ballots that have not yet been returned , and might never arrive .
Another 36,000 ail-in ballots have arrived but have yet to be counted .
Further , there are 41,000 provisional ballots that are cast when there are problems at the polls .
The projection of a Trump victory came on the same day that Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Cal Cunningham conceded his race to unseat Republican Sen. Thom Tillis in another North Carolina contest that had been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voters have spoken and I respect their decision , ” Cunningham said .
“ While the results of this election suggest there remain deep political divisions in our state and nation , the more complete story of our country lies in what unites us : our faith and sense of confidence in our democracy , our civic values and common humanity , our shared aspiration to care for one another , and our belief that we live in a country that does exceptional things , '' he said .
Tillis said he has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ my job is fighting for the jobs of the hardworking people of our state , which is why my first post-election priority will be defeating COVID-19 and getting the economy back on track .
North Carolinians have a solid record of weathering storms and coming back stronger than ever , ” he said .
The election gives Republicans , who currently hold a 53-47 majority in the Senate , a 49-48 lead in the new Senate that will convene in January .
The GOP appears likely to take an Alaska race that has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the outcome of two January special elections in Georgia will determine control of the Senate .
On Monday , Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien told his staff that the White House is not yet in Joe Biden 's hands , according to Fox News .
“ He still is in this fight , ” Stepien said , according what Fox called `` multiple people who were in the room . ''
“ There is a process , ” he added .
`` Have patience . ''
Trump 2020 Campaign Communications Director Tim Murtaugh @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Pennsylvania will “ prevail , ” according to Fox News .
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal .

One week after America went to the polls, a new projection has said President Donald Trump will win the battleground state of North Carolina.
"Decision Desk HQ Projects Trump (R) Has Won The State Of NC And Its 15 Electoral Votes Race Called At 11-10 1:41 PM," Decision Desk HQ tweeted Tuesday.
Decision Desk HQ Projects Trump (R) Has Won The State Of NC And Its 15 Electoral Votes Race Called At 11-10 1:41 PM All Results: https://t.co/mMSMwaoZxw — Decision Desk HQ (@DecisionDeskHQ) November 10, 2020
The Associated Press has not yet called the race.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
Current results from across the nation give presumptive potential president-elect Joe Biden the edge, and he was declared the winner on Saturday by several media organizations.
Trump has challenged results in a post-election legal battle that remains unresolved. North Carolina has 15 electoral votes, votes that Trump could need if his challenges in Michigan, Pennsylvania and other states succeed.
Trump currently leads Biden by 73,300 votes in North Carolina, according to the Fayetteville Observer.
“If I were the Biden folks, I would write North Carolina off, and I think they have,” said Susan Roberts, a political scientist at Davidson College.
The News and Observer did the math and estimated that 144,000 potential ballots still to be counted. That includes 93,000 mail-in ballots that have not yet been returned, and might never arrive. Another 36,000 mail-in ballots have arrived but have yet to be counted. Further, there are 41,000 provisional ballots that are cast when there are problems at the polls.
The projection of a Trump victory came on the same day that Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Cal Cunningham conceded his race to unseat Republican Sen. Thom Tillis in another North Carolina contest that had been too close to call.
“The voters have spoken and I respect their decision,” Cunningham said.
My statement on the results of this race: pic.twitter.com/dWo5gipxw8 — Cal Cunningham (@CalforNC) November 10, 2020
“While the results of this election suggest there remain deep political divisions in our state and nation, the more complete story of our country lies in what unites us: our faith and sense of confidence in our democracy, our civic values and common humanity, our shared aspiration to care for one another, and our belief that we live in a country that does exceptional things," he said.
Tillis said he has two goals.
“I know that my job is fighting for the jobs of the hardworking people of our state, which is why my first post-election priority will be defeating COVID-19 and getting the economy back on track. North Carolinians have a solid record of weathering storms and coming back stronger than ever,” he said.
North Carolinians have a solid record of weathering storms and coming back stronger than ever. I am confident that we all can come together and meet this moment and am ready to get to work. — Thom Tillis (@ThomTillis) November 10, 2020
The election gives Republicans, who currently hold a 53-47 majority in the Senate, a 49-48 lead in the new Senate that will convene in January. The GOP appears likely to take an Alaska race that has not yet been called. However, the outcome of two January special elections in Georgia will determine control of the Senate.
On Monday, Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien told his staff that the White House is not yet in Joe Biden's hands, according to Fox News.
“He still is in this fight,” Stepien said, according what Fox called "multiple people who were in the room."
“There is a process,” he added. "Have patience."
Trump 2020 Campaign Communications Director Tim Murtaugh on Tuesday said that the campaign lawsuits in Pennsylvania will “prevail,” according to Fox News.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.


wnd--2020-11-11--Polls undermine claim of Biden 'mandate'

Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi claimed when news networks declared Joe Biden the winner of the 2020 presidential race that he now has a `` mandate for action . ''
However , aside from the fact that President Trump is challenging the results , alleging vote fraud , the claim of a Biden `` mandate '' is questionable , a new poll indicates .
Only 56 % of Biden 's voters said they were voting for him , while 29 % said they voted against Trump and another 15 % were `` unsure '' why they voted for the Democrat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by Paul Bedard in his `` Washington Secrets '' column for the Washington Examiner .
`` Looking back at the presidential election , Trump voters overwhelmingly say they voted for the president , while a sizable number of Biden supporters admit they were voting against Trump rather than for the former vice president , '' Bedard said .
TRENDING : Giuliani : Trump campaign has the evidence to change Pennsylvania election results Among Trump voters , 90 % say they voted for the president , while just 8 % say they were voting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump-hate '' was part of a `` lingering hangover from Trump 's surprise 2016 victory . ''
The buyer 's remorse among Biden voters already has become evident .
Noted feminist Naomi Wolf wrote on Twitter : `` If I 'd known Biden was open to 'lockdowns ' as he now states , which is something historically unprecedented in any pandemic , and a terrifying practice , one that wo n't ever end because elites love it , I would never have voted for him . ''
Further remorse was documented in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that revealed more than a third of voters who chose Joe Biden were not aware of evidence linking him to corrupt financial dealings with China , through his son Hunter .
Had they known , the survey found , President Trump would have won at least 289 Electoral College votes .
After the new evidence in the Hunter Biden scandal was reported , a Google search trended for `` Can I change my vote ? ''
Some states do allow vote changes .
Talk-radio host Rush Limbaugh lamented the fact that so many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in an election often do n't occur until late in the campaign .
He said some assume the millions who voted early just could n't wait to express their hatred of President Trump .
`` I ’ ve been asking myself , why is that the conventional wisdom ?
Why couldn ’ t it just as easily be that there are gazillions of Trump people who are fed up and have been fed up for four years over the abject attempt to assassinate him ?
They ran a coup operation which is part @ @ @ @ @ @ @ assassination they have attempted against Donald Trump for the past four years and even five , if you want to include 2016 , the campaign year .
It has been a veritable political assassination attempt , '' Limbaugh said .
`` Why couldn ’ t it just as easily be a bunch of Trump supporters who are livid at that and who don ’ t want to wait ’ til Election Day , want to get out there to vote to affirm their support for the guy ? ''

Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi claimed when news networks declared Joe Biden the winner of the 2020 presidential race that he now has a "mandate for action."
However, aside from the fact that President Trump is challenging the results, alleging vote fraud, the claim of a Biden "mandate" is questionable, a new poll indicates.
Only 56% of Biden's voters said they were voting for him, while 29% said they voted against Trump and another 15% were "unsure" why they voted for the Democrat, according to a Rasmussen poll reported by Paul Bedard in his "Washington Secrets" column for the Washington Examiner.
"Looking back at the presidential election, Trump voters overwhelmingly say they voted for the president, while a sizable number of Biden supporters admit they were voting against Trump rather than for the former vice president," Bedard said.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
Among Trump voters, 90% say they voted for the president, while just 8% say they were voting against Biden.
Bedard said the "Trump-hate" was part of a "lingering hangover from Trump's surprise 2016 victory."
The buyer's remorse among Biden voters already has become evident.
Noted feminist Naomi Wolf wrote on Twitter: "If I'd known Biden was open to 'lockdowns' as he now states, which is something historically unprecedented in any pandemic, and a terrifying practice, one that won't ever end because elites love it, I would never have voted for him."
If I’d known Biden was open to ‘lockdowns’ as he now states, which is something historically unprecedented in any pandemic, and a terrifying practice, one that won’t ever end because elites love it, I would never have voted for him. — Dr Naomi Wolf (@naomirwolf) November 9, 2020
Further remorse was documented in a survey commissioned by the Media Research Center that revealed more than a third of voters who chose Joe Biden were not aware of evidence linking him to corrupt financial dealings with China, through his son Hunter.
Had they known, the survey found, President Trump would have won at least 289 Electoral College votes.
BREAKING: Proof the media stole the election. An MRC study finds that 4.6% of Joe Biden voters would NOT have voted for him had they known about the Biden family's corrupt business dealings. https://t.co/X8NCCHVKui — MediaResearchCenter (@theMRC) November 9, 2020
The media and Big Tech STOLE the election by covering up the Biden family corruption scandal! Now we know this information could have changed the election outcome. We must hold them accountable! https://t.co/j5F3jKm7mL — Brent Bozell (@BrentBozell) November 9, 2020
After the new evidence in the Hunter Biden scandal was reported, a Google search trended for "Can I change my vote?"
Strongly Trending (Google) since immediately after the second debate is CAN I CHANGE MY VOTE? This refers changing it to me. The answer in most states is YES. Go do it. Most important Election of your life! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 27, 2020
Some states do allow vote changes.
Talk-radio host Rush Limbaugh lamented the fact that so many already had voted, noting influential developments in an election often don't occur until late in the campaign.
He said some assume the millions who voted early just couldn't wait to express their hatred of President Trump.
"I’ve been asking myself, why is that the conventional wisdom? Why couldn’t it just as easily be that there are gazillions of Trump people who are fed up and have been fed up for four years over the abject attempt to assassinate him? They ran a coup operation which is part of a smaller subset the overall political assassination they have attempted against Donald Trump for the past four years and even five, if you want to include 2016, the campaign year. It has been a veritable political assassination attempt," Limbaugh said.
"Why couldn’t it just as easily be a bunch of Trump supporters who are livid at that and who don’t want to wait ’til Election Day, want to get out there to vote to affirm their support for the guy?"


wnd--2020-11-11--RealClearPolitics: Biden has not been elected

Media outlets and polling organizations on Saturday declared Joe Biden the winner of the 2020 presidential race after announcing that Pennsylvania had gone for Biden .
But RealClearPolitics -- known for its oft-cited aggregate of major polls -- still has not called the crucial battleground state .
On Twitter , RealClearPolitics co-founder Tom Bevan corrected New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani 's claim that the site had called the race for Biden then retracted .
`` We never called Pennsylvania , and nothing has changed , '' Bevan wrote , reported The Hill .
TRENDING : Giuliani : Trump campaign has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Amid court challenges and a Supreme Court order to set aside ballots received after Election Day , RealClearPolitics has Biden at only 259 Electoral College votes , short of the needed 270 .
Establishment media also has called Arizona for Biden , but RealClear Politics has not called that state and its 11 electoral votes as well .
A Trump campaign court challenge in Pennsylvania argues the results can not be certified because in-person voters were differently from those who mailed their ballots .
In Michigan , the Great Lakes Justice Center is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ including election workers coaching voters to choose Biden .
Political analyst Andy Puzder wrote at RealClearPolitics on Tuesday that the media should not have called the race so early .
`` Joe Biden has made it clear that he will do his best to 'unify ' the country following an election in which more than 71 million Americans – nearly half the electorate – voted for Donald Trump .
It is an admirable goal , '' he wrote .
`` But any chance of that happening depends on the American people having confidence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fair and honest process .
Though never perfect , our electoral system has generally instilled confidence for the past 231 years , which is why it has worked so well . ''
He said that under `` the contentious circumstances of this election , the traditional media ’ s decision to declare a victor before the official process had run its course has diminished the confidence of Trump voters in the announced result . ''
`` Even if the declaration of a Biden victory is found to be accurate , the call was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ effort to unify our nation far more difficult , '' he said .
`` President Trump is contesting the reported results in those states where the race is close , and the conduct of election officials and the processes used appear suspicious .
He is clearly within his rights to contest the results ; his supporters generally want him to do so .
Allowing the legal process to run its course is the only way to foster the unity Biden seeks . ''
He argued that unity is much less likely when the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is resolved .
`` In 2012 , many Republicans felt disappointed when Mitt Romney lost to President Obama .
Very few felt cheated , '' he noted .
`` That will not be the case in 2020 if the current president ’ s supporters believe that the media preempted the official process so as to disparage or prevent a full investigation of the president ’ s claims . ''
He pointed out the New York Times had even claimed that `` the role of declaring the winner of a presidential election in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ '' Nope , he said , that responsibility falls on Congress .
`` But that tweet told the president ’ s supporters all they needed to know about the media ’ s intent , '' he wrote .
`` For months , traditional news outlets have been telling us that he would lose his bid for reelection in a landslide and that a 'blue wave ' would sweep the nation , turning control of Capitol Hill completely over to the Democrats , '' he noted .
`` Reporters – not just pundits , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – treated Biden ’ s decisive victory as a foregone conclusion , actively discouraging their readers and viewers from even considering the possibility of a second Trump term . ''
When the election results did n't support that , he said , the media still demanded voters `` trust them as they declare that their favored candidate won the election . ''
`` The media ’ s rush to judgment has done a grave disservice to the goal of unifying our nation . ''
Besides Pennsylvania and Arizona , RealClearPolitics still has not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

Media outlets and polling organizations on Saturday declared Joe Biden the winner of the 2020 presidential race after announcing that Pennsylvania had gone for Biden.
But RealClearPolitics -- known for its oft-cited aggregate of major polls -- still has not called the crucial battleground state.
On Twitter, RealClearPolitics co-founder Tom Bevan corrected New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani's claim that the site had called the race for Biden then retracted.
"We never called Pennsylvania, and nothing has changed," Bevan wrote, reported The Hill.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
This is false. We never called Pennsylvania, and nothing has changed. https://t.co/YXZ1PjI7Ud — Tom Bevan (@TomBevanRCP) November 10, 2020
Amid court challenges and a Supreme Court order to set aside ballots received after Election Day, RealClearPolitics has Biden at only 259 Electoral College votes, short of the needed 270.
Establishment media also has called Arizona for Biden, but RealClear Politics has not called that state and its 11 electoral votes as well.
Will Joe Biden eventually be sworn in as president as a result of the 2020 election? Yes No Completing this poll entitles you to WND news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use You're logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out. 7% (53 Votes) 93% (727 Votes)
A Trump campaign court challenge in Pennsylvania argues the results cannot be certified because in-person voters were differently from those who mailed their ballots.
In Michigan, the Great Lakes Justice Center is suing over alleged election law violations, including election workers coaching voters to choose Biden.
Political analyst Andy Puzder wrote at RealClearPolitics on Tuesday that the media should not have called the race so early.
"Joe Biden has made it clear that he will do his best to 'unify' the country following an election in which more than 71 million Americans – nearly half the electorate – voted for Donald Trump. It is an admirable goal," he wrote. "But any chance of that happening depends on the American people having confidence that the election outcome resulted from a fair and honest process. Though never perfect, our electoral system has generally instilled confidence for the past 231 years, which is why it has worked so well."
He said that under "the contentious circumstances of this election, the traditional media’s decision to declare a victor before the official process had run its course has diminished the confidence of Trump voters in the announced result."
"Even if the declaration of a Biden victory is found to be accurate, the call was premature, and it will make the effort to unify our nation far more difficult," he said.
"President Trump is contesting the reported results in those states where the race is close, and the conduct of election officials and the processes used appear suspicious. He is clearly within his rights to contest the results; his supporters generally want him to do so. Allowing the legal process to run its course is the only way to foster the unity Biden seeks."
He argued that unity is much less likely when the media declares a winner before the matter is resolved.
"In 2012, many Republicans felt disappointed when Mitt Romney lost to President Obama. Very few felt cheated," he noted. "That will not be the case in 2020 if the current president’s supporters believe that the media preempted the official process so as to disparage or prevent a full investigation of the president’s claims."
He pointed out the New York Times had even claimed that "the role of declaring the winner of a presidential election in the U.S. falls to the news media."
Nope, he said, that responsibility falls on Congress.
"But that tweet told the president’s supporters all they needed to know about the media’s intent," he wrote.
"For months, traditional news outlets have been telling us that he would lose his bid for reelection in a landslide and that a 'blue wave' would sweep the nation, turning control of Capitol Hill completely over to the Democrats," he noted. "Reporters – not just pundits, but ostensibly fair-minded 'straight news' professionals – treated Biden’s decisive victory as a foregone conclusion, actively discouraging their readers and viewers from even considering the possibility of a second Trump term."
When the election results didn't support that, he said, the media still demanded voters "trust them as they declare that their favored candidate won the election."
"The media’s rush to judgment has done a grave disservice to the goal of unifying our nation."
Besides Pennsylvania and Arizona, RealClearPolitics still has not called North Carolina, Alaska and Georgia.


wnd--2020-11-11--Michigan AG threatens journalist exposing vote fraud

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel sent a `` cease and desist '' letter to a website that published evidence prior to the election that Detroit poll workers were trained to engage in and cover up vote fraud .
Nessel is contesting Big League Politics reporter Shen Trejo 's reporting that poll workers bragged they were committing voter fraud in a variety of different ways , the Gateway Pundit reported .
Trejo , who says he witnessed vote fraud in Detroit , considers the AG 's letter to be `` witness intimidation '' and fears it will be used as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ later date Oct. 28 and received Nov. 9 , Nessel cites two or three factual errors in Trejo 's extensive reporting and demands that every article related to his # DetroitLeaks series be removed from the internet , the Gateway Pundit said .
TRENDING : Giuliani : Trump campaign has the evidence to change Pennsylvania election results Trejo reported Detroit poll workers were trained how to lie , how to handle ballot challenges from Trump supporters , told to call 911 on any challengers and to use COVID as an excuse to deny @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as they were being counted and tabulated .
Even challenged ballots were to be processed as regular ballots .
Incoming State Rep. Steve Carra and Michigan activist Bob Cushman filed a successful lawsuit against Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson over the allegations that poll workers were being trained how to commit vote fraud .
The Gateway Pundit reported it has been approached by independent witnesses who confirm that the predictions by # DetroitLeaks before the election were accurate .
Poll workers for Wayne County/Detroit at the TCF Center in Detroit indeed refused @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as an excuse to deny access to review the process and tabulated challenged illegal ballots .
The AG 's letter coincides with another round of social media purges in Michigan of Facebook groups documenting the allegations of voter fraud , the Gateway Pundit said .

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel sent a "cease and desist" letter to a website that published evidence prior to the election that Detroit poll workers were trained to engage in and cover up vote fraud.
Nessel is contesting Big League Politics reporter Shen Trejo's reporting that poll workers bragged they were committing voter fraud in a variety of different ways, the Gateway Pundit reported.
Trejo, who says he witnessed vote fraud in Detroit, considers the AG's letter to be "witness intimidation" and fears it will be used as a pretext for criminal action.
In a later date Oct. 28 and received Nov. 9, Nessel cites two or three factual errors in Trejo's extensive reporting and demands that every article related to his #DetroitLeaks series be removed from the internet, the Gateway Pundit said.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
Trejo reported Detroit poll workers were trained how to lie, how to handle ballot challenges from Trump supporters, told to call 911 on any challengers and to use COVID as an excuse to deny poll challengers access to viewing the ballots as they were being counted and tabulated. Even challenged ballots were to be processed as regular ballots.
Incoming State Rep. Steve Carra and Michigan activist Bob Cushman filed a successful lawsuit against Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson over the allegations that poll workers were being trained how to commit vote fraud.
The Gateway Pundit reported it has been approached by independent witnesses who confirm that the predictions by #DetroitLeaks before the election were accurate.
Poll workers for Wayne County/Detroit at the TCF Center in Detroit indeed refused challenges from poll challengers, used COVID as an excuse to deny access to review the process and tabulated challenged illegal ballots.
Are high-ranking government officials complicit in stealing the 2020 presidential race? Yes No Completing this poll entitles you to WND news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use You're logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out. 99% (1140 Votes) 1% (8 Votes)
The AG's letter coincides with another round of social media purges in Michigan of Facebook groups documenting the allegations of voter fraud, the Gateway Pundit said.


wnd--2020-11-11--USPS vote-fraud whistleblower: I did not recant testimony

Countering a House Democrat claim that a U.S .
Postal Service whistleblower has recanted testimony that a supervisor ordered the backdating of mail ballots in Pennyslvania , Project Veritas has released an audio recording of federal agents coercing the whistleblower , who stands by his testimony .
The whistleblower , Richard Hopkins , told Project Veritas last Thursday that Postmaster Rob Weisenbach in Erie , Pennsylvania , ordered the backdating of ballots to Nov. 3 so that late ballots would be accepted .
In a recording released Tuesday night , Russell Strasser , an agent of the USPS Office of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` I am trying to twist you a little bit . ''
`` We have senators involved .
We have the Department of Justice involved , '' Strasser says .
TRENDING : Giuliani : Trump campaign has the evidence to change Pennsylvania election results Hopkins interjects that he also has been in contact with President Trump 's lawyers .
`` I am not — I am actually , '' Strasser continues , `` I am trying to twist you a little bit because in that , believe it or not , your mind @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to control our mind , '' says Strasser .
`` And when we do that , we can convince ourselves of a memory .
But when you ’ re under a little bit of stress , which is what I ’ m doing to you purposely , your mind can be a little bit clearer .
And we ’ re going to do a different exercise too , to make your mind a little bit clearer .
So , this is all on purpose . ''
Project Veritas says it will soon release @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intimidate and coerce Hopkins into recanting .
`` The recordings are explosive evidence of retaliation , 'scaring ' him , '' O'Keefe wrote on Twitter .
`` Whistleblower has received a letter putting him on suspension without pay . ''
Project Veritas also released a video Tuesday in which Hopkins declares he did not recant .
Hopkins says he tried to contact Washington Post reporters to inform them that a story they wrote claiming he recanted was false .
Earlier Tuesday , O'Keefe called a series of tweets by the House Oversight Committee @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The committee said on Twitter that the whistleblower has `` completely RECANTED his allegations of a supervisor tampering with mail-in ballots after being questioned by investigators , according to '' the USPS inspector general .
The committee said IG investigators informed committee staff Tuesday `` that they interviewed Hopkins on Friday , but that Hopkins RECANTED HIS ALLEGATIONS yesterday and did not explain why he signed a false affidavit . ''
Hopkins revealed his identity on Friday after his USPS superiors saw his Thursday interview with Project Veritas .
Hopkins told Project Veritas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ordering carriers to backdate ballots that were received after Election Day .
Hopkins made it clear he did not see his supervisor backdating ballots but heard him and his colleagues talking about doing it .
Hopkins said that after his superiors saw his interview with Project Veritas they brought up other issues they had with him in the past .
`` They said that I was , because of certain factors , I was kind of implicated as the one who had come out , so they wanted to get my side of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an investigation into this , '' he explained .
`` I think this comes from above them , and that 's what I told the postal inspectors .
I just think they were just doing what they were told . ''
Hopkins said that about 20 minutes after Project Veritas broke the story , his supervisor called him and told him he would not be needed at his scheduled time Saturday morning .
Unsure of keeping his job , Hopkins established a GoFundMe account to raise $ 50,000 .
It soon surpassed $ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ platform : My name is Richard Hopkins and I currently work for the United States Postal Service in Erie , Pennsylvania and I am willing to testify under oath that 2020 Presidential Election ballots are being backdated to November 3rd by my supervisors .
I made the difficult decision to risk everything in my life to come forward with this information of extreme wrongdoing by the Post Office .
I am uncertain of what the future holds for me but I felt the public had a right to know what is really going @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been threatening my employment .
I am scared for myself , my family , and those closest to me .
Thank you James O ’ Keefe and Project Veritas for letting me tell my story when others wouldn ’ t .
Please support me as I go forward with this battle .
Hopkins told Project Veritas that other employees `` feel the same way I do , but they do not want to say anything . ''
`` They contacted me , and actually were like : 'That was badass and what-not .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ did what I did — because they know things are — some odd stuff , '' he said .
Hopkins told O'Keefe he told the USPS inspectors exactly what he told Project Veritas .
`` I was casing my route and I saw the postmaster pull one of our supervisors to the side , '' he said .
`` He was pulling the supervisor , it was , and it was really close to where my case was — so , I was able to hear , listen in and I heard him @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up yesterday . ''
The whistleblower said he was curious about what was messed up .
`` He told the supervisor they had postmarked one of the ballots for the fourth , instead of the third , because they were supposed to put them for the third , '' Hopkins said .

Countering a House Democrat claim that a U.S. Postal Service whistleblower has recanted testimony that a supervisor ordered the backdating of mail ballots in Pennyslvania, Project Veritas has released an audio recording of federal agents coercing the whistleblower, who stands by his testimony.
The whistleblower, Richard Hopkins, told Project Veritas last Thursday that Postmaster Rob Weisenbach in Erie, Pennsylvania, ordered the backdating of ballots to Nov. 3 so that late ballots would be accepted.
In a recording released Tuesday night, Russell Strasser, an agent of the USPS Office of Inspector General, says to Hopkins, "I am trying to twist you a little bit."
"We have senators involved. We have the Department of Justice involved," Strasser says.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
Hopkins interjects that he also has been in contact with President Trump's lawyers.
"I am not — I am actually," Strasser continues, "I am trying to twist you a little bit because in that, believe it or not, your mind will kick in.
"We like to control our mind," says Strasser. "And when we do that, we can convince ourselves of a memory. But when you’re under a little bit of stress, which is what I’m doing to you purposely, your mind can be a little bit clearer. And we’re going to do a different exercise too, to make your mind a little bit clearer. So, this is all on purpose."
Project Veritas says it will soon release other recordings of federal agents attempting to intimidate and coerce Hopkins into recanting.
Is the U.S. Postal Service involved in vote fraud in the 2020 election? Yes No Completing this poll entitles you to WND news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use You're logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out. 99% (813 Votes) 1% (7 Votes)
"The recordings are explosive evidence of retaliation, 'scaring' him," O'Keefe wrote on Twitter. "Whistleblower has received a letter putting him on suspension without pay."
Project Veritas also released a video Tuesday in which Hopkins declares he did not recant.
USPS Whistleblower Richard Hopkins: “I DID NOT RECANT”@washingtonpost ‘s @shawnboburg and @jacobbogage have been played by the same federal agents that are on the audio coercing the whistleblower to recant. AUDIO TAPES OF COERCION TO BE RELEASED IMMINENTLY... pic.twitter.com/vjlWj6elkB — James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) November 11, 2020
Hopkins says he tried to contact Washington Post reporters to inform them that a story they wrote claiming he recanted was false.
'Soviet style'
Earlier Tuesday, O'Keefe called a series of tweets by the House Oversight Committee "soviet style truth suppression."
The committee said on Twitter that the whistleblower has "completely RECANTED his allegations of a supervisor tampering with mail-in ballots after being questioned by investigators, according to" the USPS inspector general.
The committee said IG investigators informed committee staff Tuesday "that they interviewed Hopkins on Friday, but that Hopkins RECANTED HIS ALLEGATIONS yesterday and did not explain why he signed a false affidavit."
UPDATE: @Project_Veritas has obtained recordings of fed agents interrogating PA USPS whistleblower re: backdating ballots. The recordings are explosive evidence of retaliation, “scaring” him. Whistleblower has received a letter putting him on suspension without pay. More soon. pic.twitter.com/8I5L8jqUsu — James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) November 10, 2020
Hopkins revealed his identity on Friday after his USPS superiors saw his Thursday interview with Project Veritas.
Hopkins told Project Veritas his supervisors and others above him were ordering carriers to backdate ballots that were received after Election Day.
Hopkins made it clear he did not see his supervisor backdating ballots but heard him and his colleagues talking about doing it.
Hopkins said that after his superiors saw his interview with Project Veritas they brought up other issues they had with him in the past.
"They said that I was, because of certain factors, I was kind of implicated as the one who had come out, so they wanted to get my side of the story because they wanted to start an investigation into this," he explained. "I think this comes from above them, and that's what I told the postal inspectors. I just think they were just doing what they were told."
We have recordings of the federal agents, who COERCED this man through a 4 hour interrogation Without representation, who stands by his original affidavit re: backdating ballots. Standby for recordings doubling down on backdating ballots. This is soviet style truth suppression https://t.co/toK6r8zb2m — James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) November 10, 2020
Hopkins said that about 20 minutes after Project Veritas broke the story, his supervisor called him and told him he would not be needed at his scheduled time Saturday morning.
Unsure of keeping his job, Hopkins established a GoFundMe account to raise $50,000. It soon surpassed $53,000.
He wrote on the fundraising platform:
My name is Richard Hopkins and I currently work for the United States Postal Service in Erie, Pennsylvania and I am willing to testify under oath that 2020 Presidential Election ballots are being backdated to November 3rd by my supervisors. I made the difficult decision to risk everything in my life to come forward with this information of extreme wrongdoing by the Post Office. I am uncertain of what the future holds for me but I felt the public had a right to know what is really going on. The Post Office has already been threatening my employment. I am scared for myself, my family, and those closest to me. Thank you James O’Keefe and Project Veritas for letting me tell my story when others wouldn’t. Please support me as I go forward with this battle.
Hopkins told Project Veritas that other employees "feel the same way I do, but they do not want to say anything."
"They contacted me, and actually were like: 'That was badass and what-not. They were kind of glad that I did what I did — because they know things are — some odd stuff," he said.
Hopkins told O'Keefe he told the USPS inspectors exactly what he told Project Veritas.
"I was casing my route and I saw the postmaster pull one of our supervisors to the side," he said. "He was pulling the supervisor, it was, and it was really close to where my case was — so, I was able to hear, listen in and I heard him say to the supervisor that they messed up yesterday."
The whistleblower said he was curious about what was messed up.
"He told the supervisor they had postmarked one of the ballots for the fourth, instead of the third, because they were supposed to put them for the third," Hopkins said.