wnd--2020-11-09--Giuliani: Trump campaign has the evidence to change Pennsylvania election results

The Trump campaign has lawsuits ready to go this week that could radically change the picture of the presidential election , attorney Rudy Giuliani said Sunday .
Giuliani appeared on the Fox News show `` Sunday Morning Futures '' with Maria Bartiromo and said that the campaign 's evidence could change which candidate won in Pennsylvania , which is currently in the column of Democratic Joe Biden .
`` In Philadelphia , where we are furthest ahead , we have about 60 or 70 witnesses in Pennsylvania , Philadelphia and in Pittsburgh .
In Pittsburgh , we have observers who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the room or kept away from the room where they were counting the mail-in ballots , which of course are the highly suspicious ballots , '' he said .
`` During that period of time , at least 135,000 ballots were counted , none of which were observed by any Republican observer as the law requires , '' he said .
Giuliani claimed that bundles of mail-in ballots were brought in late .
TRENDING : Trump releases defiant statement as Biden and media declare victory , vows to fight '' It looked very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up the 700,000 difference that they had from election night , '' he said .
Giuliani alleged another 300,000 ballots were counted while no GOP observers were allowed to watch .
`` Even though we went to court , and we were allowed to move 6 feet closer , the Democrat-machine people moved the counting place six feet further away .
This is documented on videotape , '' he said .
“ There are upwards of 50 witnesses , and this will be the subject of a lawsuit that we file tomorrow for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unfair election , for violating the law of the state , for treating Pittsburgh and Philadelphia different than the rest of the state , ” Giuliani said .
“ This is something that just has to be addressed , '' he said .
Giuliani said there is no way to determine the validity of thousands of ballots .
`` We 're at now 450,000 definite mail-in ballots that they separated from the envelope , threw the envelope away .
We can never tell if they 're valid or not , '' he said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whether ballots were cast in the name of people who are dead , and will look into back-dating ballots .
`` We have evidence now , from not only the Post Office but from others , that there was back-dating .
I can only tell you right now that that amounts to about 2,000 or 3,000 votes , '' Giuliani said .
`` Do you believe that you have enough to actually change the fate of the election ? ''
Bartiromo asked .
`` Well , I think we have enough to change @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disaster , '' Giuliani said .
He said that overall , he believes up to 900,000 ballots will be called into question by the evidence the campaign has amassed since Election Day .
Giuliani speculated that ballots were kept in reserve in case they were needed .
Later in the interview , Bartiromo asked whether President Donald Trump should concede , now that Biden has been named as the winner by multiple media organizations .
“ At this point , it would be wrong for him to concede , ” Giuliani said .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ was an election that in at least three or four states , and possibly 10 , it was stolen , ” Giuliani said .
“ In other words , it was based on false votes .
Now , you can ’ t let an election go into history without challenging that . ''
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal .

The Trump campaign has lawsuits ready to go this week that could radically change the picture of the presidential election, attorney Rudy Giuliani said Sunday.
Giuliani appeared on the Fox News show "Sunday Morning Futures" with Maria Bartiromo and said that the campaign's evidence could change which candidate won in Pennsylvania, which is currently in the column of Democratic Joe Biden.
"In Philadelphia, where we are furthest ahead, we have about 60 or 70 witnesses in Pennsylvania, Philadelphia and in Pittsburgh. In Pittsburgh, we have observers who for 24 hours were kept out of the room or kept away from the room where they were counting the mail-in ballots, which of course are the highly suspicious ballots," he said.
"During that period of time, at least 135,000 ballots were counted, none of which were observed by any Republican observer as the law requires," he said.
Giuliani claimed that bundles of mail-in ballots were brought in late.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
"It looked very much like they were trying to make up the 700,000 difference that they had from election night," he said.
Giuliani alleged another 300,000 ballots were counted while no GOP observers were allowed to watch.
"Even though we went to court, and we were allowed to move 6 feet closer, the Democrat-machine people moved the counting place six feet further away. This is documented on videotape," he said.
“There are upwards of 50 witnesses, and this will be the subject of a lawsuit that we file tomorrow for violating civil rights, for conducting an unfair election, for violating the law of the state, for treating Pittsburgh and Philadelphia different than the rest of the state,” Giuliani said.
Do you expect Trump to win his legal challenges in Pennsylvania? Yes No Completing this poll entitles you to WND news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use You're logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out. 92% (1181 Votes) 8% (109 Votes)
“This is something that just has to be addressed," he said.
Giuliani said there is no way to determine the validity of thousands of ballots.
"We're at now 450,000 definite mail-in ballots that they separated from the envelope, threw the envelope away. We can never tell if they're valid or not," he said.
Giuliani said the campaign will review whether ballots were cast in the name of people who are dead, and will look into back-dating ballots.
"We have evidence now, from not only the Post Office but from others, that there was back-dating. I can only tell you right now that that amounts to about 2,000 or 3,000 votes," Giuliani said.
"Do you believe that you have enough to actually change the fate of the election?" Bartiromo asked.
"Well, I think we have enough to change Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania election was a disaster," Giuliani said.
He said that overall, he believes up to 900,000 ballots will be called into question by the evidence the campaign has amassed since Election Day.
Giuliani speculated that ballots were kept in reserve in case they were needed.
Later in the interview, Bartiromo asked whether President Donald Trump should concede, now that Biden has been named as the winner by multiple media organizations.
“At this point, it would be wrong for him to concede,” Giuliani said.
“There is strong evidence that this was an election that in at least three or four states, and possibly 10, it was stolen,” Giuliani said.
“In other words, it was based on false votes. Now, you can’t let an election go into history without challenging that."
Did you know that The Western Journal now publishes some content in Spanish as well as English, for international audiences? Click here to read this article on The Western Journal en Español!
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.


wnd--2020-11-09--President Trump officially has received more votes than Barack Obama ever did

The messy , disputed 2020 presidential election will go into the record books for something more than the number of lawsuits engendered by the decision by many states to adopt mass mail-in ballots .
President Donald Trump became the first sitting president to top 70 million votes , with a total of 70,812,803 as of incomplete and unofficial returns posted on Fox News as of Sunday afternoon .
He also moves ahead of former President Barack Obama , who received 69,498,516 votes in the 2008 presidential election , according to the Federal Election Commission .
Obama 's mark had been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this election .
Trump noted his achievement on Twitter , and also shared his contention that it should have been enough to win .
TRENDING : Trump releases defiant statement as Biden and media declare victory , vows to fight Obama was unable to increase that when he ran in 2012 , totaling 62,615,406 when he defeated Republican candidate Mitt Romney , now a U.S .
Senator from Utah , according to NBC .
After all , Trump received 62,984,828 votes to win the 2016 election , according to the Federal Election Commission @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ahead of Obama , he also stands ahead of other Republicans in the popular vote .
Romney received about 59 million votes , according to NBC .
Former President Ronald Reagan , in his 1984 landslide victory , polled slightly less than 54.5 million votes , according to The New York Times .
Some noted that Trump 's turnout was an incredible achievement .
Trump 's record showing for a sitting president , however , trailed the popular vote total of Democrat Joe Biden , who has been projected to be the election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a popular vote margin of 4,401,183 over Trump .
But a closer look at the number shows that taking away only one state would give Trump a popular vote victory .
In California , Biden had a lead of 9,163,725 votes to Trump 's 4,741,191 , a margin of 4,422,534 .
Thus , taking away Biden 's margin in California , he would be trailing Trump in the popular vote total for the other 49 states .
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal .

The messy, disputed 2020 presidential election will go into the record books for something more than the number of lawsuits engendered by the decision by many states to adopt mass mail-in ballots.
President Donald Trump became the first sitting president to top 70 million votes, with a total of 70,812,803 as of incomplete and unofficial returns posted on Fox News as of Sunday afternoon.
He also moves ahead of former President Barack Obama, who received 69,498,516 votes in the 2008 presidential election, according to the Federal Election Commission.
Obama's mark had been the record for any presidential candidate until this election.
Trump noted his achievement on Twitter, and also shared his contention that it should have been enough to win.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
71,000,000 Legal Votes. The most EVER for a sitting President! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 7, 2020
THE OBSERVERS WERE NOT ALLOWED INTO THE COUNTING ROOMS. I WON THE ELECTION, GOT 71,000,000 LEGAL VOTES. BAD THINGS HAPPENED WHICH OUR OBSERVERS WERE NOT ALLOWED TO SEE. NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE. MILLIONS OF MAIL-IN BALLOTS WERE SENT TO PEOPLE WHO NEVER ASKED FOR THEM! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 7, 2020
Obama was unable to increase that when he ran in 2012, totaling 62,615,406 when he defeated Republican candidate Mitt Romney, now a U.S. Senator from Utah, according to NBC.
After all, Trump received 62,984,828 votes to win the 2016 election, according to the Federal Election Commission.
Not only does that put Trump ahead of Obama, he also stands ahead of other Republicans in the popular vote.
Romney received about 59 million votes, according to NBC.
Former President Ronald Reagan, in his 1984 landslide victory, polled slightly less than 54.5 million votes, according to The New York Times.
Some noted that Trump's turnout was an incredible achievement.
Trump focused on getting out the vote and he did in record numbers, 71 million strong. If we want our country to survive we must not give up and not give in... ever! And as @TheLastRefuge2 eloquently said we must expose the corruption 'by any means necessary' — NathanHale (@hale1755) November 8, 2020
Trump’s Popular Vote Tops Obama’s Record-Setting Performance in 2008 https://t.co/dVwCAGr5MT — Stephi Connolly (@ConnollyStephi) November 8, 2020
Trump's record showing for a sitting president, however, trailed the popular vote total of Democrat Joe Biden, who has been projected to be the election winner based on electoral totals.
Biden received 75,215,986 votes, as of Sunday afternoon.
That is a popular vote margin of 4,401,183 over Trump. But a closer look at the number shows that taking away only one state would give Trump a popular vote victory.
In California, Biden had a lead of 9,163,725 votes to Trump's 4,741,191, a margin of 4,422,534.
Thus, taking away Biden's margin in California, he would be trailing Trump in the popular vote total for the other 49 states.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.


wnd--2020-11-08--University shrink: Trump's 'loss' is beginning of 'perfection' of American Union

( THE COLLEGE FIX ) -- A Tufts University psychiatry professor says President Trump ’ s ( apparent ) defeat @ @ @ @ @ merely the beginning of the US ’ s “ perfection ” the Founding Fathers dreamed @ @ @ @ @ Today , Nassir Ghaemi points to anti-Trumpers ’ and Democrats ’ shock that the race @ @ @ @ @ it was .
After all , Ghaemi says , Trump ’ s “ complete failure @ @ @ @ @ almost 250,000 deaths !
What was it about the 48 percent of the American electorate @ @ @ @ @ It wasn ’ t tax cuts , Ghaemi says , nor China or Russia policy @ @ @ @ @ Court and immigration played only “ indirect ” roles .

(THE COLLEGE FIX) -- A Tufts University psychiatry professor says President Trump’s (apparent) defeat in the 2020 election is merely the beginning of the US’s “perfection” the Founding Fathers dreamed of.
Writing in Psychology Today, Nassir Ghaemi points to anti-Trumpers’ and Democrats’ shock that the race ended up as close as it was. After all, Ghaemi says, Trump’s “complete failure” with COVID resulted in almost 250,000 deaths!
What was it about the 48 percent of the American electorate who voted for Trump? It wasn’t tax cuts, Ghaemi says, nor China or Russia policy. And the US Supreme Court and immigration played only “indirect” roles.
Read the full story ›


wnd--2020-11-08--Public university separates whites and nonwhites in post-election 'dialogue'

( THE COLLEGE FIX ) -- President Trump improved his numbers with black and Hispanic voters this election compared to @ @ @ @ @ t tell the diversity bureaucrats at the University of Cincinnati .
The taxpayer-funded institution hosted @ @ @ @ @ Wednesday and Thursday for “ Students of Color , ” as well as a “ @ @ @ @ @ black students .
Rather than explicitly divide whites and nonwhites in the dialogue events , @ @ @ @ @ each other .
Each Webex meeting Wednesday and Thursday was scheduled for the same time @ @ @ @ @ color and the other for “ All Bearcats.
” ( Oddly , “ Wokeshop Wednesday @ @ @ @ @ link to participate in the event . )

(THE COLLEGE FIX) -- President Trump improved his numbers with black and Hispanic voters this election compared to 2016, but don’t tell the diversity bureaucrats at the University of Cincinnati.
The taxpayer-funded institution hosted post-election “dialogue” events Wednesday and Thursday for “Students of Color,” as well as a “Wokeshop Wednesday” event for black students.
Rather than explicitly divide whites and nonwhites in the dialogue events, the university scheduled them against each other. Each Webex meeting Wednesday and Thursday was scheduled for the same time, one for students of color and the other for “All Bearcats.” (Oddly, “Wokeshop Wednesday” did not include a link to participate in the event.)
Read the full story ›


wnd--2020-11-08--Prof blames whiteness and sexism for closeness of presidential race

( THE COLLEGE FIX ) -- Princeton African-American Studies Professor Eddie Glaude was back at it the morning after Election @ @ @ @ @ rhetorical weapons of racism , whiteness and patriarchy this time as the culprit for the @ @ @ @ @ reported by Newsbusters , when asked on “ MSNBC Live ” why Joe Biden/Donald Trump @ @ @ @ @ Glaude told host Craig Melvin it was because “ whiteness still animates the core of @ @ @ @ @ ” Glaude asked “ What are these people voting for when they vote for Donald @ @ @ @ @ voting for ?
There ’ s incompetence , 230,000 dead .
There ’ s mendacity @ @ @ @ @ There ’ s corruption , there ’ s hatred , there ’ s grievance , @ @ @ @ @ What are they voting for ?
”

(THE COLLEGE FIX) -- Princeton African-American Studies Professor Eddie Glaude was back at it the morning after Election Day, brandishing his usual rhetorical weapons of racism, whiteness and patriarchy this time as the culprit for the neck-and-neck presidential race.
As reported by Newsbusters, when asked on “MSNBC Live” why Joe Biden/Donald Trump race was so close, Glaude told host Craig Melvin it was because “whiteness still animates the core of this country along with selfishness.”
Glaude asked “What are these people voting for when they vote for Donald Trump? What are they voting for? There’s incompetence, 230,000 dead. There’s mendacity, lying every day. There’s corruption, there’s hatred, there’s grievance, there’s resentment. What are they voting for?”
Read the full story ›


wnd--2020-11-08--Cannabis can reduce symptoms of OCD, at least for a little while

( STUDY FINDS ) -- PULLMAN , Wash. — Obsessive-compulsive disorder ( OCD ) can be a constant disruptive force @ @ @ @ @ life .
Researchers at Washington State University say people dealing with these repetitive behaviors and @ @ @ @ @ a controversial source .
Their study reveals cannabis can significantly cut down on the symptoms @ @ @ @ @ for a short period of time .
Researchers find that within four hours of smoking @ @ @ @ @ experienced 60 percent fewer compulsions .
Their intrusive or unwanted thoughts also reduced by 49 @ @ @ @ @ 52 percent .
For patients taking higher doses of cannabis with higher concentrations of cannabidiol @ @ @ @ @ improvement was even greater .
The study examined data reported to the Strainprint app by @ @ @ @ @ treat their symptoms .

(STUDY FINDS) -- PULLMAN, Wash. — Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) can be a constant disruptive force in a patient’s life. Researchers at Washington State University say people dealing with these repetitive behaviors and distractions may find relief in a controversial source. Their study reveals cannabis can significantly cut down on the symptoms of OCD, at least for a short period of time.
Researchers find that within four hours of smoking cannabis, patients with OCD experienced 60 percent fewer compulsions. Their intrusive or unwanted thoughts also reduced by 49 percent and anxiety decreased by 52 percent. For patients taking higher doses of cannabis with higher concentrations of cannabidiol (CBD), the improvement was even greater.
The study examined data reported to the Strainprint app by 87 individuals using marijuana to treat their symptoms.
Read the full story ›


wnd--2020-11-08--AOC threatens to quit politics, slams 'hostile' Dems for not being progressive enough

( ZERO HEDGE ) -- Just hours after the mainstream media has anointed Joe Biden as President-Elect , Rep. Alexandria @ @ @ @ @ some type of meltdown .
With Trump on his way out of office , AOC @ @ @ @ @ a new cause : Democrats that are n't moving far enough to the left .
@ @ @ @ @ that the Presidential election seems to have swung in her favor since there was no @ @ @ @ @ AOC said this weekend that Democrats who lost House seats `` relied too heavily on @ @ @ @ @ tactics , '' according to Fox News .
She called those who lost seats `` @ @ @ @ @ the claim that some Democrats thought the ideas of defunding the police and the Green @ @ @ @ @ seats ; and made the Presidential race extremely close .

(ZERO HEDGE) -- Just hours after the mainstream media has anointed Joe Biden as President-Elect, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez seems to be having some type of meltdown. With Trump on his way out of office, AOC has turned her ire against a new cause: Democrats that aren't moving far enough to the left.
Perhaps indifferent about the fact that the Presidential election seems to have swung in her favor since there was no "blue wave", AOC said this weekend that Democrats who lost House seats "relied too heavily on outdated Democratic National Committee campaign tactics," according to Fox News.
She called those who lost seats "sitting ducks" and refuted the claim that some Democrats thought the ideas of defunding the police and the Green New Deal cost moderates their seats; and made the Presidential race extremely close.
Read the full story ›


wnd--2020-11-08--Trump's rallies were called 'super spreader' events, silence over Biden supporters flooding streets

When President Donald Trump held campaign rallies , condemnations flew that the rallies for potentially spreading COVID-19 and they were labeled `` super-spreader '' events .
However , on Saturday , then thousands of anti-Trump demonstrators took to the streets of major cities following the news media 's announcement that Democrat Joe Biden was the winner of the presidential election , the mainstream media withheld its disapproval .
In Washington , D.C. , Philadelphia , New York City and elsewhere , Biden supporters were crammed together in celebration .
Fox News took CNN to task for its reporting TRENDING : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media declare victory , vows to fight '' People have just gone out to the streets .
People are just so excited , so happy right now , '' CNN anchor Wolf Blitzer said .
`` They 're wearing masks .
They 're not [ doing ] much social distancing , but they are at least wearing masks . ''
Media members tweeted images of sardine-like crowds with no comments about masks .
It was a far cry from the coverage given to Trump events by liberal outlets like Politico and Vox , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deaths .
And the difference between calling a Trump event a `` super spreader '' event and a Biden event a celebration was noted by many .
Amid the jam-packed gathering , Britt Hume of Fox News wondered if this new normal would allow fans to return to stadiums .
`` How the media shifted so abruptly from 'anyone going to a spacious beach is a super-spreading monster killing Grandma ' to 'these mass , densely populated protests with people screaming on top of each other are so inspiring ' was one of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ '' journalist Glenn Greenwald tweeted .
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal .

When President Donald Trump held campaign rallies, condemnations flew that the rallies for potentially spreading COVID-19 and they were labeled "super-spreader" events.
However, on Saturday, then thousands of anti-Trump demonstrators took to the streets of major cities following the news media's announcement that Democrat Joe Biden was the winner of the presidential election, the mainstream media withheld its disapproval.
In Washington, D.C., Philadelphia, New York City and elsewhere, Biden supporters were crammed together in celebration.
Fox News took CNN to task for its reporting
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
"People have just gone out to the streets. People are just so excited, so happy right now," CNN anchor Wolf Blitzer said. "They're wearing masks. They're not [doing] much social distancing, but they are at least wearing masks."
Media members tweeted images of sardine-like crowds with no comments about masks.
The crowd outside the White House celebrating Joe Biden’s projected victory is blaring YMCA — the song President Trump closed out his latest rallies with. pic.twitter.com/UkrsBq8l5M — Kaitlan Collins (@kaitlancollins) November 7, 2020
it's ok guys. some people are wearing masks. pic.twitter.com/nP1ZHTOF4I — tsar becket adams (@BecketAdams) November 7, 2020
Brooklynites dancing and singing “Na na hey hey kiss him goodbye.” @NY1 pic.twitter.com/ijGC5odWLh — Lindsay Tuchman (@LindsayTuchman) November 7, 2020
It was a far cry from the coverage given to Trump events by liberal outlets like Politico and Vox, which linked Trump rallies to hundreds of deaths. And the difference between calling a Trump event a "super spreader" event and a Biden event a celebration was noted by many.
And suddenly people gathering in large crowds and not social distancing is no longer considered irresponsible by the media https://t.co/JisiiJJr78 — Marco Rubio (@marcorubio) November 7, 2020
Where is @JoeBiden calling on the massive Super Spreader events held in his name to end❓ ⬇ pic.twitter.com/8JaofpgMge — Kayleigh McEnany (@kayleighmcenany) November 7, 2020
This is all perfectly fine because, as we’ve learned, covid is a politically enlightened virus that spares those with the correct ideological leanings https://t.co/groESOv51h — Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) November 7, 2020
Amid the jam-packed gathering, Britt Hume of Fox News wondered if this new normal would allow fans to return to stadiums.
If this is ok because people are masked, why isn’t it ok to have fans in masks in stadiums this fall? https://t.co/sU09BNWSep — Brit Hume (@brithume) November 7, 2020
"How the media shifted so abruptly from 'anyone going to a spacious beach is a super-spreading monster killing Grandma' to 'these mass, densely populated protests with people screaming on top of each other are so inspiring' was one of 2020's most credibility-destroying media acts," journalist Glenn Greenwald tweeted.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.


wnd--2020-11-08--Iran threatens Arab nations making peace with Israel

Iran is in a fury over President Trump 's peace deals between three Islamic nations and the Middle East 's premiere democracy , Israel .
The mullah-led regime sees the normalization of relations between the United Arab Emirates , Bahrain , Sudan and the Jewish state as a direct threat , endangering its hegemony in the Persian Gulf , reports the Middle East Media Research Institute .
It 's also a `` severe blow to Iran 's narrative of Islamic unity and Islamic values , and to the ideological messages of the Islamic revolutionary regime in Iran that claims to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the pure and correct Islam , '' MEMRI said .
TRENDING : Trump releases defiant statement as Biden and media declare victory , vows to fight Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei wrote in Twitter that the Muslim nations `` will not tolerate any normalization with the Zionist regime . ''
`` The Americans are wrong if they think they can solve the problem of the region in this manner , '' he said .
`` Sadly , there are countries in the region whose citizens are observant and faithful Muslims , [ but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ religion , do not heed its directives and do not implement them , [ including ] with respect to the Palestinian people , who are their brothers and speak their language , '' he said .
`` They claim to be Arab .
… Where is your [ Arab ] identity ?
What has happened to it ?
[ The Israelis ] are committing more and more crimes in Palestine every day .
How can you reach out to Israel , which will later [ lead to ] giving it a base in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ [ of this agreement ] will be on your head .
You are the ones who are violating the rules and [ endangering ] the security of this region . ''
The Trump administration went against precedent , bypassing the Palestinian issue and approaching the Arab nations directly .
The White House has said that several more nations are on the brink of agreements with Israel .
Any nation that follows the path of the UAE , Bahrain and Sudan will be seen as aiding and abetting `` the enemy , '' Israel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Staff Mohammad Bagheri He said that `` if the Zionists have a foothold here , and if even the smallest harm were to be caused to our national security and defense , we will view these countries as providing bases for the enemy , and we will respond the way we would respond towards any enemy . ''
Ali Akbar Velayati , a Khamenei adviser , said the `` enemies of the pure Islam and the hypocrites have once again removed the mask from their faces and evilly and deceptively declared their shame @ @ @ @ @ @ @ '' `` The American strategists , who in the recent years have experienced numerous and ongoing defeats in the international arena , and especially in the Middle East , have no goal but to employ propaganda so as to achieve normalization between the region 's autocrats [ and Israel ] as a service to the Zionist lobby , in order to win [ the Zionists ' ] votes in America 's presidential elections and save the prime minister of the wretched Zionist regime , whose position in the occupied territories [ i.e.
, @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , '' he said .
He accused the Arab nations normalizing relations with Israel of building their foundations on `` the hollow promises of the Great Satan , the criminal America . ''
Iranian Defense Minister Amir Hatami said any `` threat '' will be met `` with a clear and direct response . ''
And Hossein Amir-Abdollahian , an adviser to the Majlis speaker , said : `` The UAE , Saudi Arabia , and Bahrain are giving the Zionist Israelis a foothold in the warm waters of the Persian Gulf .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ game , they are fanning the flames .
The response of the Islamic Republic of Iran to maximally preserve its national security , and regional security ...
If even the smallest harm is caused to the Islamic Republic or its allies in the region , its response will not only be aimed at the Zionists .
It will also be aimed at those who have given the Zionist regime a foothold in the region .
The political and security arrangements in the region will not allow the Zionists to breathe a sigh of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the maximal preservation of Iran 's national security… '' Iran 's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps said : `` The hangman-ruler of Bahrain should await the bitter revenge of the fighters of Jerusalem , the fighters of the devout Islamic nation , against his country .
The disgraceful act of [ Bahraini King Hamad bin Isa ] Aal Khalifa and of his regime , which is dependent [ on America ] the establishment of relations with the Zionist regime , against the will and aspirations of [ his ] country 's Muslim people is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ entirely illegitimate and will meet with appropriate responses . ''
The IRGC , warning of a domino effect , called Trump the `` hated and stupid American president . ''

Iran is in a fury over President Trump's peace deals between three Islamic nations and the Middle East's premiere democracy, Israel.
The mullah-led regime sees the normalization of relations between the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Sudan and the Jewish state as a direct threat, endangering its hegemony in the Persian Gulf, reports the Middle East Media Research Institute.
It's also a "severe blow to Iran's narrative of Islamic unity and Islamic values, and to the ideological messages of the Islamic revolutionary regime in Iran that claims to be the standard-bearer of the defense of the pure and correct Islam," MEMRI said.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei wrote in Twitter that the Muslim nations "will not tolerate any normalization with the Zionist regime."
"The Americans are wrong if they think they can solve the problem of the region in this manner," he said.
Iranian President Hassan Rohani, during a meeting, blasted the Arab Gulf states.
"Sadly, there are countries in the region whose citizens are observant and faithful Muslims, [but] whose rulers do not understand the religion, do not heed its directives and do not implement them, [including] with respect to the Palestinian people, who are their brothers and speak their language," he said. "They claim to be Arab. … Where is your [Arab] identity? What has happened to it? [The Israelis] are committing more and more crimes in Palestine every day. How can you reach out to Israel, which will later [lead to] giving it a base in this region? All the grave outcomes [of this agreement] will be on your head. You are the ones who are violating the rules and [endangering] the security of this region."
The Trump administration went against precedent, bypassing the Palestinian issue and approaching the Arab nations directly.
The White House has said that several more nations are on the brink of agreements with Israel.
Any nation that follows the path of the UAE, Bahrain and Sudan will be seen as aiding and abetting "the enemy," Israel, warned Iranian Armed Forces Chief of Staff Mohammad Bagheri
He said that "if the Zionists have a foothold here, and if even the smallest harm were to be caused to our national security and defense, we will view these countries as providing bases for the enemy, and we will respond the way we would respond towards any enemy."
Ali Akbar Velayati, a Khamenei adviser, said the "enemies of the pure Islam and the hypocrites have once again removed the mask from their faces and evilly and deceptively declared their shame and their treason throughout the world."
"The American strategists, who in the recent years have experienced numerous and ongoing defeats in the international arena, and especially in the Middle East, have no goal but to employ propaganda so as to achieve normalization between the region's autocrats [and Israel] as a service to the Zionist lobby, in order to win [the Zionists'] votes in America's presidential elections and save the prime minister of the wretched Zionist regime, whose position in the occupied territories [i.e., in Israel] is now very weak," he said.
He accused the Arab nations normalizing relations with Israel of building their foundations on "the hollow promises of the Great Satan, the criminal America."
Iranian Defense Minister Amir Hatami said any "threat" will be met "with a clear and direct response."
And Hossein Amir-Abdollahian, an adviser to the Majlis speaker, said: "The UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Bahrain are giving the Zionist Israelis a foothold in the warm waters of the Persian Gulf. They must know that in this dangerous game, they are fanning the flames. The response of the Islamic Republic of Iran to maximally preserve its national security, and regional security... If even the smallest harm is caused to the Islamic Republic or its allies in the region, its response will not only be aimed at the Zionists. It will also be aimed at those who have given the Zionist regime a foothold in the region. The political and security arrangements in the region will not allow the Zionists to breathe a sigh of relief. This is a necessity for the maximal preservation of Iran's national security…"
Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps said: "The hangman-ruler of Bahrain should await the bitter revenge of the fighters of Jerusalem, the fighters of the devout Islamic nation, against his country. The disgraceful act of [Bahraini King Hamad bin Isa] Aal Khalifa and of his regime, which is dependent [on America] the establishment of relations with the Zionist regime, against the will and aspirations of [his] country's Muslim people is an act of great stupidity that is entirely illegitimate and will meet with appropriate responses."
The IRGC, warning of a domino effect, called Trump the "hated and stupid American president."


wnd--2020-11-09--Trump campaign staff says statistics show fraud in Wisconsin

( WASHINGTON EXAMINER ) -- As the president 's path to 270 Electoral College votes narrows virtually every day , @ @ @ @ @ say statistical evidence of fraud in Wisconsin could give him a victory .
One member @ @ @ @ @ team who spoke with the Washington Examiner on the condition of anonymity said ballot data @ @ @ @ @ by Democrats in the city .
The distribution of those ballots in favor of presumptive @ @ @ @ @ individual alleged , violates Benford 's Law — an analytical framework used by statisticians when @ @ @ @ @ data points .
Benford 's Law is often used by election analysts , both in @ @ @ @ @ , to detect voter fraud or other sorts of improprieties in elections .
U.S. government @ @ @ @ @ Department of Agriculture , often apply Benford 's Law when auditing information from farmers who @ @ @ @ @

(WASHINGTON EXAMINER) -- As the president's path to 270 Electoral College votes narrows virtually every day, some members of his campaign say statistical evidence of fraud in Wisconsin could give him a victory.
One member of President Trump's reelection team who spoke with the Washington Examiner on the condition of anonymity said ballot data in Milwaukee indicates illegal activity by Democrats in the city. The distribution of those ballots in favor of presumptive President-elect Joe Biden, the individual alleged, violates Benford's Law — an analytical framework used by statisticians when observing a set of randomized data points.
Benford's Law is often used by election analysts, both in the United States and abroad, to detect voter fraud or other sorts of improprieties in elections. U.S. government agencies, like the U.S. Department of Agriculture, often apply Benford's Law when auditing information from farmers who rely on federal subsidies.
Read the full story ›


wnd--2020-11-09--In Nevada: Dead voters, vans full of Biden ballots

( WASHINGTON EXAMINER ) -- NORTH LAS VEGAS , Nevada — President Trump 's Nevada legal team beefed up its @ @ @ @ @ signature verification in the state with startling claims of voter and ballot fraud .
Among @ @ @ @ @ , votes from thousands who no longer live in Nevada , and a van marked @ @ @ @ @ opened mail-in ballots .
Former Nevada Attorney General Adam Laxalt , who is helping Trump @ @ @ @ @ state , detailed grievances that the campaign has with mail-in ballot signature verification in Clark @ @ @ @ @ accounts for the vast majority of voters in the state .

(WASHINGTON EXAMINER) -- NORTH LAS VEGAS, Nevada — President Trump's Nevada legal team beefed up its legal challenge to mail-in ballot signature verification in the state with startling claims of voter and ballot fraud.
Among the allegations: dead voters, votes from thousands who no longer live in Nevada, and a van marked "Biden-Harris" full of opened mail-in ballots.
Former Nevada Attorney General Adam Laxalt, who is helping Trump's legal effort in the state, detailed grievances that the campaign has with mail-in ballot signature verification in Clark County, Nevada, which accounts for the vast majority of voters in the state.
Read the full story ›


wnd--2020-11-09--'How old is the president?' Siri gives Kamala's age

With plenty of confusion and controversy over who won the presidential election – Joe Biden or Donald Trump – apparently the artificial intelligence of Apple 's Siri thinks someone else may be the winner .
On Sunday evening , when Siri was asked the simple question , `` How old is the president ?
, '' the electronic voice would answer , `` Kamala Harris was born 56 years ago . ''
It also displayed the birth date of the Democratic vice presidential candidate as Oct. 20 , 1964 .
TRENDING : Trump releases defiant statement as Biden and media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ replicated the same question and incorrect answer numerous times during the 10 p.m hour Sunday night , and by 10:48 p.m. Eastern , the problem had been corrected .
When asked the same question , Siri eventually responded with , `` Donald Trump is 74 years old . ''
WND was n't the only news outlet who experienced the strange issue .
Sharyl Attkisson , a former CBS News reporter who is now a nonpartisan independent journalist with Full Measure News , had the same problem .
`` Ok , I bit .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ asked Siri 'How old is the president ? '
and it gave me Kamala Harris and her birth date . ''
The incident is reminiscent of some `` mistaken '' reporting this summer in which the Politico reported Kamala Harris was Joe Biden 's choice for his running mate days before he made the actual announcement .
`` Joe Biden chose Kamala Harris to become his running mate for the 2020 election on Aug. 1 , two weeks before the Democratic National Convention , after keeping his choice close to the chest for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ report which has since been deleted .
Brad Dayspring , Politico 's vice president of marketing and communications , told the Hill , `` We regret the error and any confusion that it caused . ''
Some online reaction to Siri 's Sunday night confusion about the president 's age includes : • `` Siri is three sheets to the wind right now .
But Alexa is still giving the correct answer , so there 's that . ''
• `` Well ... she is 6 months off from being correct . ''
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ level than ever before with the Holy Spirit-filled books by Joe Kovacs

With plenty of confusion and controversy over who won the presidential election – Joe Biden or Donald Trump – apparently the artificial intelligence of Apple's Siri thinks someone else may be the winner.
On Sunday evening, when Siri was asked the simple question, "How old is the president?," the electronic voice would answer, "Kamala Harris was born 56 years ago."
It also displayed the birth date of the Democratic vice presidential candidate as Oct. 20, 1964.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
WND replicated the same question and incorrect answer numerous times during the 10 p.m hour Sunday night, and by 10:48 p.m. Eastern, the problem had been corrected.
When asked the same question, Siri eventually responded with, "Donald Trump is 74 years old."
WND wasn't the only news outlet who experienced the strange issue.
Are Democrats planning on making Kamala Harris president soon? Yes No Completing this poll entitles you to WND news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use You're logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out. 99% (433 Votes) 1% (4 Votes)
Sharyl Attkisson, a former CBS News reporter who is now a nonpartisan independent journalist with Full Measure News, had the same problem.
"Ok, I bit." Attkisson noted. "I just asked Siri 'How old is the president?' and it gave me Kamala Harris and her birth date."
Ok, I bit. I just asked Siri "How old is the president?" and it gave me Kamala Harris and her birth date. — Sharyl Attkisson🕵♂ (@SharylAttkisson) November 9, 2020
The incident is reminiscent of some "mistaken" reporting this summer in which the Politico reported Kamala Harris was Joe Biden's choice for his running mate days before he made the actual announcement.
"Joe Biden chose Kamala Harris to become his running mate for the 2020 election on Aug. 1, two weeks before the Democratic National Convention, after keeping his choice close to the chest for months," Politico wrote in the report which has since been deleted.
Brad Dayspring, Politico's vice president of marketing and communications, told the Hill, "We regret the error and any confusion that it caused."
Some online reaction to Siri's Sunday night confusion about the president's age includes:
"We’re living in Orwell's 1984."
"Siri is three sheets to the wind right now. But Alexa is still giving the correct answer, so there's that."
"Well ... she is 6 months off from being correct."
"They killed Biden already?"
Learn astonishing Bible truth on a higher level than ever before with the Holy Spirit-filled books by Joe Kovacs
Follow Joe on Twitter @JoeKovacsNews


wnd--2020-11-10--'Jeopardy!' honors Alex Trebek in Monday's episode

At the beginning of Monday night 's episode , the show 's executive producer Mike Richards took a moment to @ @ @ @ @ remembrance of Trebek .
`` Over the weekend we lost our beloved host Alex Trebek @ @ @ @ @ `` This is an enormous loss for our staff and crew , for his family @ @ @ @ @ fans .
He loved this show and everything it stood for .
In fact , @ @ @ @ @ less than two weeks ago . ''

(FOX NEWS) -- "Jeopardy!" is honoring the late television icon Alex Trebek.
At the beginning of Monday night's episode, the show's executive producer Mike Richards took a moment to say a few words in remembrance of Trebek.
"Over the weekend we lost our beloved host Alex Trebek," Richards said. "This is an enormous loss for our staff and crew, for his family and for his millions of fans. He loved this show and everything it stood for. In fact, he taped his final episodes less than two weeks ago."
Read the full story ›


wnd--2020-11-10--Barr authorizes probe into 'substantial allegations' of voting irregularities

( FOX NEWS ) -- Attorney General William Barr on Monday gave federal prosecutors the green light to pursue `` @ @ @ @ @ irregularities before the 2020 presidential election is certified next month , even though little evidence @ @ @ @ @ forth .
In a memo obtained by Fox News , Barr advised that allegations concerning @ @ @ @ @ handled with great care ” and that “ specious , speculative , fanciful or far-fetched @ @ @ @ @ basis for initiating federal inquiries.
” Barr ’ s actions give prosecutors the ability to @ @ @ @ @ normally would prohibit such overt actions before the election is formally certified .

(FOX NEWS) -- Attorney General William Barr on Monday gave federal prosecutors the green light to pursue "substantial allegations" of voting irregularities before the 2020 presidential election is certified next month, even though little evidence of fraud has been put forth.
In a memo obtained by Fox News, Barr advised that allegations concerning voter fraud “should be handled with great care” and that “specious, speculative, fanciful or far-fetched claims should not be a basis for initiating federal inquiries.”
Barr’s actions give prosecutors the ability to circumvent longstanding DOJ policy that normally would prohibit such overt actions before the election is formally certified.
Read the full story ›


wnd--2020-11-10--The 1st Amendment right school denies student

[ Editor 's note : This story originally was published by Real Clear Religion . ]
When my daughter returned to school wearing a mask that read “ Jesus Loves Me , ” my husband and I never guessed that such an unobjectionable message would cause any controversy .
And of course , we never expected that her First Amendment rights would later be violated .
Certainly not in our small town , seated on the Bible belt in Mississippi – and especially not with our 9-year-old daughter at her own school , where she is supposed to be learning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Constitution guarantees for her and all Americans .
Consistent with her school ’ s COVID-19 guidelines , our daughter Lydia has been wearing a mask for the last several months , including occasionally her “ Jesus Loves Me ” mask .
Many students throughout the district have worn messages on masks to express themselves – sports teams and university logos , television phrases , political candidates , and even the phrase “ Black Lives Matter.
” But after months of wearing her mask without incident , Lydia was pulled aside and told @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or messages on her mask .
TRENDING : Trump releases defiant statement as Biden and media declare victory , vows to fight I immediately researched and found no policy prohibiting messages on face masks .
I spoke with several other parents and later questioned the incident on a private social media post .
The next school day , after being notified of my post , the principal verified Lydia was wearing her “ Jesus Loves Me ” mask again and called to explain that masks can not have political or religious messages .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ replace her mask .
After speaking with multiple school officials and questioning this incident on social media , the school ’ s leadership changed its policies to prohibit any religious messages on masks in an attempt to justify their actions against Lydia and discredit our complaint .
My husband and I soon discovered the discrepancy and their attempt to cover up the incident .
But even the policy they put in after the fact violates my daughter ’ s First Amendment rights .
After seeing this policy and this gross attempt to hide @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suit with the help of our attorneys with Alliance Defending Freedom .
As a parent , I am the primary teacher of my children , and in addition to and consistent with our faith in Jesus Christ , we have instilled in them a love for our country and the freedoms it allows to worship , express , and live by our faith in God .
Being wronged on a personal level is only the beginning ; freedom extends far beyond ourselves .
Public schools are supposed to be the very places where @ @ @ @ @ @ @ taught and modeled .
Instead , our daughter ’ s religious freedom and freedom of speech were censored because her expression was considered offensive and unwelcome by the school ’ s leadership .
This behavior can not be tolerated .
So , as my daughter ’ s primary teacher , I have one more lesson for her : when your freedoms are violated , you stand up for them .
You fight for what is right .
Our daughter ’ s , or any child ’ s , constitutional rights do not disappear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This isn ’ t just about a mask ; it is about public-school leadership picking and choosing which viewpoints are welcome at school .
This is about doing what is right , not manipulating policy to cover faults .
My husband and I are suing the Simpson County School District not only for the trespasses our daughter has experienced , but for any child that has had their freedoms violated .
We are taking a stand to protect those freedoms in the future .
And we take comfort in knowing that “ for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ work together for good—for those who are called according to his purpose ” ( Romans 8:28 ) .
Jennifer Booth and her husband Matthew Booth are parents in the Simpson County School District .
[ Editor 's note : This story originally was published by Real Clear Religion . ]

[Editor's note: This story originally was published by Real Clear Religion.]
By Jennifer Booth
Real Clear Religion
When my daughter returned to school wearing a mask that read “Jesus Loves Me,” my husband and I never guessed that such an unobjectionable message would cause any controversy. And of course, we never expected that her First Amendment rights would later be violated. Certainly not in our small town, seated on the Bible belt in Mississippi – and especially not with our 9-year-old daughter at her own school, where she is supposed to be learning about this great country and the freedoms the Constitution guarantees for her and all Americans.
Consistent with her school’s COVID-19 guidelines, our daughter Lydia has been wearing a mask for the last several months, including occasionally her “Jesus Loves Me” mask. Many students throughout the district have worn messages on masks to express themselves – sports teams and university logos, television phrases, political candidates, and even the phrase “Black Lives Matter.” But after months of wearing her mask without incident, Lydia was pulled aside and told she could not wear “words” or messages on her mask.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
I immediately researched and found no policy prohibiting messages on face masks. I spoke with several other parents and later questioned the incident on a private social media post. The next school day, after being notified of my post, the principal verified Lydia was wearing her “Jesus Loves Me” mask again and called to explain that masks cannot have political or religious messages. Lydia was then forced to remove and replace her mask.
After speaking with multiple school officials and questioning this incident on social media, the school’s leadership changed its policies to prohibit any religious messages on masks in an attempt to justify their actions against Lydia and discredit our complaint. My husband and I soon discovered the discrepancy and their attempt to cover up the incident.
But even the policy they put in after the fact violates my daughter’s First Amendment rights. After seeing this policy and this gross attempt to hide their fault, we have now filed suit with the help of our attorneys with Alliance Defending Freedom.
As a parent, I am the primary teacher of my children, and in addition to and consistent with our faith in Jesus Christ, we have instilled in them a love for our country and the freedoms it allows to worship, express, and live by our faith in God. Being wronged on a personal level is only the beginning; freedom extends far beyond ourselves.
Public schools are supposed to be the very places where our nation’s fundamental freedoms are taught and modeled. Instead, our daughter’s religious freedom and freedom of speech were censored because her expression was considered offensive and unwelcome by the school’s leadership. This behavior cannot be tolerated.
So, as my daughter’s primary teacher, I have one more lesson for her: when your freedoms are violated, you stand up for them. You fight for what is right. Our daughter’s, or any child’s, constitutional rights do not disappear when she walks into her school.
This isn’t just about a mask; it is about public-school leadership picking and choosing which viewpoints are welcome at school. This is about doing what is right, not manipulating policy to cover faults. My husband and I are suing the Simpson County School District not only for the trespasses our daughter has experienced, but for any child that has had their freedoms violated. We are taking a stand to protect those freedoms in the future.
And we take comfort in knowing that “for those who love God, all things work together for good—for those who are called according to his purpose” (Romans 8:28).
Jennifer Booth and her husband Matthew Booth are parents in the Simpson County School District.
[Editor's note: This story originally was published by Real Clear Religion.]


wnd--2020-11-10--Biden told to second Trump's demand for ballot review

[ Editor 's note : This story originally was published by Real Clear Politics . ]
If Joe Biden wants to bring our country together , he should endorse President Trump ’ s demand not only for recounts but extensive ballot reviews in at least the four states where the Democrat now leads by a whisker : Arizona , Georgia , Pennsylvania and Wisconsin .
This statesman-like move would acknowledge that those who did not support him have legitimate concerns about ballot integrity in an election defined by the sudden and massive shift to mail-in voting .
It would demonstrate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and help remove a cloud that may hang over his likely presidency .
TRENDING : Trump releases defiant statement as Biden and media declare victory , vows to fight Biden , of course , overcame significant election night deficits to eke out bare margins in those four states .
On Saturday afternoon , he had a 20,500 vote lead in Arizona out of 3.25 million votes cast ; in Georgia he was beating Trump by 7,000 votes out of 4.9 million cast ; in Pennsylvania he enjoyed a 38,000 vote margin out of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by 20,500 out of 3.24 million votes .
Sometimes , you just get lucky .
But given that Biden ’ s margins largely came from mail-in ballots , further review is necessary before he is certified as the winner .
A lot can go wrong with mail-in votes .
The Washington Post reported in August that 534,000 mail-in ballots were rejected across the country in this year ’ s primary elections , which typically see much smaller turnouts than the record-setting general election .
This would suggest that far more ballots , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rejected this month – or perhaps should have been .
Color me skeptical since we haven ’ t heard Democrats complain about this in a very tight race .
We need to know how and why ballots were tabulated .
Before this election , Democrats and their media allies regularly attacked Republican support for voter ID laws by claiming that there was little proof of in-person fraud as opposed to absentee votes , which had traditionally favored the GOP .
They now insist that America ’ s elections are as pure as Caesar @ @ @ @ @ @ @ view , one must also assert that electoral politics – a field dominated by highly ambitious and often conniving figures competing in one of the few zero sum games in life ( the winner gets everything and the loser nothing ) – is perhaps the only human endeavor free from corruption .
The truth is we don ’ t know the true extent of voter fraud because we don ’ t look for it .
Consider the 2018 election in North Carolina ’ s 9th Congressional District .
In the Republican primary , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ while garnering 96 % of Bladen County ’ s mail-in vote .
That astonishing total was the reddest of flags .
Nevertheless , North Carolina ’ s Board of Elections did nothing .
This criminal behavior came to light when a Harris operative engaged in additional illegal ballot harvesting in the general election , prompting his Democratic opponent to lodge a complaint , which led to a new race .
Texas is one of the few states that has made some effort to investigate voter fraud : In 2018 alone , 33 people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ August , the city council race in Paterson , N.J. , was invalidated because of voter fraud .
Mail-in ballots raise a host of other concerns regarding the 2020 race .
Did ineligible voters – including noncitizens , barred felons , or the dead – participate ?
Did people registered in multiple states cast multiple ballots , or vote in the swing state they had moved from rather than the safe state they now reside in ?
How many people sent in their absentee ballot and also showed up at the polls to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden ’ s razor-thin margins , these questions must be asked and answered .
Apart from providing clarity about the 2020 result , a thorough ballot review will build confidence about future elections by determining whether fraud and error are merely political hiccups or a cancer on our body politic .
For many Republicans , Biden ’ s anointment by media outlets that have savaged Trump for four years seems less like a cold-eyed reckoning of the math than a partisan move to set the terms of debate going forward .
Imagine the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a comfortable lead on Election Day that evaporated as the counting occurred in Republican strongholds , eventually giving Trump margin-of-error wins in key states ?
Would the Associated Press and CNN and all the others now be declaring Trump the winner or reporting that a long battle looms to ensure that the count was fair and accurate ?
An honest accounting of the 2020 returns will not heal our nation .
But Biden ’ s support for such an effort would provide the kind of national leadership we desperately need .

[Editor's note: This story originally was published by Real Clear Politics.]
By J. Peder Zane
Real Clear Politics
If Joe Biden wants to bring our country together, he should endorse President Trump’s demand not only for recounts but extensive ballot reviews in at least the four states where the Democrat now leads by a whisker: Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
This statesman-like move would acknowledge that those who did not support him have legitimate concerns about ballot integrity in an election defined by the sudden and massive shift to mail-in voting. It would demonstrate Biden’s commitment to fair elections and help remove a cloud that may hang over his likely presidency.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
Biden, of course, overcame significant election night deficits to eke out bare margins in those four states. On Saturday afternoon, he had a 20,500 vote lead in Arizona out of 3.25 million votes cast; in Georgia he was beating Trump by 7,000 votes out of 4.9 million cast; in Pennsylvania he enjoyed a 38,000 vote margin out of 6.65 million; and led in Wisconsin by 20,500 out of 3.24 million votes.
Sometimes, you just get lucky. But given that Biden’s margins largely came from mail-in ballots, further review is necessary before he is certified as the winner. A lot can go wrong with mail-in votes. The Washington Post reported in August that 534,000 mail-in ballots were rejected across the country in this year’s primary elections, which typically see much smaller turnouts than the record-setting general election.
This would suggest that far more ballots, the majority of which favored Democrats, were rejected this month – or perhaps should have been. Color me skeptical since we haven’t heard Democrats complain about this in a very tight race. We need to know how and why ballots were tabulated.
Before this election, Democrats and their media allies regularly attacked Republican support for voter ID laws by claiming that there was little proof of in-person fraud as opposed to absentee votes, which had traditionally favored the GOP.
They now insist that America’s elections are as pure as Caesar’s wife. To embrace that view, one must also assert that electoral politics – a field dominated by highly ambitious and often conniving figures competing in one of the few zero sum games in life (the winner gets everything and the loser nothing) – is perhaps the only human endeavor free from corruption.
The truth is we don’t know the true extent of voter fraud because we don’t look for it. Consider the 2018 election in North Carolina’s 9th Congressional District. In the Republican primary, Mark Harris defeated incumbent Rep. Robert Pittenger while garnering 96% of Bladen County’s mail-in vote. That astonishing total was the reddest of flags. Nevertheless, North Carolina’s Board of Elections did nothing. This criminal behavior came to light when a Harris operative engaged in additional illegal ballot harvesting in the general election, prompting his Democratic opponent to lodge a complaint, which led to a new race.
Texas is one of the few states that has made some effort to investigate voter fraud: In 2018 alone, 33 people were convicted of the crime. This August, the city council race in Paterson, N.J., was invalidated because of voter fraud.
Mail-in ballots raise a host of other concerns regarding the 2020 race. Did ineligible voters – including noncitizens, barred felons, or the dead – participate? Did people registered in multiple states cast multiple ballots, or vote in the swing state they had moved from rather than the safe state they now reside in? How many people sent in their absentee ballot and also showed up at the polls to make sure their vote counted?
Given Biden’s razor-thin margins, these questions must be asked and answered. Apart from providing clarity about the 2020 result, a thorough ballot review will build confidence about future elections by determining whether fraud and error are merely political hiccups or a cancer on our body politic.
For many Republicans, Biden’s anointment by media outlets that have savaged Trump for four years seems less like a cold-eyed reckoning of the math than a partisan move to set the terms of debate going forward.
Imagine the reverse: What if Biden had had a comfortable lead on Election Day that evaporated as the counting occurred in Republican strongholds, eventually giving Trump margin-of-error wins in key states? Would the Associated Press and CNN and all the others now be declaring Trump the winner or reporting that a long battle looms to ensure that the count was fair and accurate?
An honest accounting of the 2020 returns will not heal our nation. But Biden’s support for such an effort would provide the kind of national leadership we desperately need.


wnd--2020-11-10--Report: Trump tells advisers he's interested in a 2024 run

A new report claims that if President Donald Trump does not prevail in his legal challenges regarding the 2020 election results , he will launch another bid for the White House in 2024 .
Axios reported on Monday that Trump is “ privately discussing ” a 2024 run , should the legal dominoes not fall his way .
Reporter Jonathan Swan claimed he had heard from “ two sources ” close to the campaign about that potential outcome .
TRENDING : Trump releases defiant statement as Biden and media declare victory , vows to fight “ President Trump has already @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for president again in 2024 , two sources familiar with the conversations tell Axios , ” the outlet reported .
The media ’ s four years of slanted coverage against Trump should give voters great cause to take Swan ’ s reporting with a grain of salt .
As voters saw in the run-up to the 2020 election , many stories published with alleged sources close to Trump have not been credible .
In the same article purporting to have access to Trump ’ s thoughts on not only this election , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unsubstantiated claim that Trump knows he has lost the election .
Swan reported , “ This is the clearest indication yet that Trump understands he has lost the 2020 election to Joe Biden -- even as the president continues to falsely insist that he is the true winner , that there has been election fraud and that his team will fight to the end in the courts.
” As of Monday , the campaign has given no signal that Trump intends to do anything other than use the court system to challenge alleged @ @ @ @ @ @ @ widespread ballot irregularities in a number of key states .
The Axios report is one of many out this week with alleged direct knowledge of the mood inside of Trump 's campaign .
A report published Monday by Fox News , which also cited unnamed sources , claimed Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien briefed campaign aides that Trump is “ not backing down , ” and will not concede the contested election .
Fox reported that at a Monday meeting at the campaign ’ s headquarters , Stepien said , “ [ Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Citing people in the room as sources , Fox reported Stepien added , “ There is a process , ” and further urged everyone to “ have patience.
” For now , the only credible information about the campaign ’ s approach to the contested election seems to be on fighting the results in court in Georgia , Pennsylvania , Michigan and other states .
The Trump campaign was hard at work on Monday in these states challenging the results and presenting evidence to prove alleged widespread discrepancies and irregularities with not only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some of these ballots arrived .
One noteworthy piece of information from the Axios report , though , does signal the establishment media is well aware of Trump 's influence among core GOP voters .
The report , though , ignores inroads Trump has made with women and minority voters .
Axios reported that should Trump come up short after exhausting his legal remedies , he would be a force to be reckoned with , should he indeed throw his hat into the 2024 GOP primary .
Swan reported , “ Aides advising @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2024 are dreading the prospect of a Trump run given the extraordinary sway he holds over millions of GOP voters.
” “ Even four years after leaving office , he could remain formidable in a Republican primary , '' added the Axios reporter .
`` That fact alone could freeze the ambitions , fundraising and staffing of individual candidates -- and of the Republican National Committee as it seeks to regroup and move beyond Trump.
” It is indeed difficult to imagine any scenario where Trump would not the undisputed leader of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ second term president or as a private citizen .
But the media 's apparent desire to continue to prematurely call the current race should be disregarded for now .
The process will end up in the courts before the election is officially called , despite the mainstream media ’ s collective decision Saturday to announce Biden as the country 's president-elect .
While that could end up being the case , Trump has given no indication that he intends to do anything other than fight to challenge the results of the disputed election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden 's purported margins of victory are slim .
The coming court battles should play out before any premature speculation about Trump 's reported thoughts on the 2024 primary , as he 's still technically alive in the current race .
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal .

A new report claims that if President Donald Trump does not prevail in his legal challenges regarding the 2020 election results, he will launch another bid for the White House in 2024.
Axios reported on Monday that Trump is “privately discussing” a 2024 run, should the legal dominoes not fall his way.
Reporter Jonathan Swan claimed he had heard from “two sources” close to the campaign about that potential outcome.
Scoop: President Trump had already told advisers he's thinking about running for president again in 2024. https://t.co/XmdzNfN8N5 — Jonathan Swan (@jonathanvswan) November 9, 2020
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
“President Trump has already told advisers he's thinking about running for president again in 2024, two sources familiar with the conversations tell Axios,” the outlet reported.
The media’s four years of slanted coverage against Trump should give voters great cause to take Swan’s reporting with a grain of salt.
As voters saw in the run-up to the 2020 election, many stories published with alleged sources close to Trump have not been credible.
In the same article purporting to have access to Trump’s thoughts on not only this election, but the next one, Swan made an unsubstantiated claim that Trump knows he has lost the election.
Should Trump run for president in 2024 if he fails to stay in office now? Yes No Completing this poll entitles you to WND news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use You're logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out. 94% (92 Votes) 6% (6 Votes)
Swan reported, “This is the clearest indication yet that Trump understands he has lost the 2020 election to Joe Biden -- even as the president continues to falsely insist that he is the true winner, that there has been election fraud and that his team will fight to the end in the courts.”
As of Monday, the campaign has given no signal that Trump intends to do anything other than use the court system to challenge alleged, and in some cases well-documented, widespread ballot irregularities in a number of key states.
The Axios report is one of many out this week with alleged direct knowledge of the mood inside of Trump's campaign.
A report published Monday by Fox News, which also cited unnamed sources, claimed Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien briefed campaign aides that Trump is “not backing down,” and will not concede the contested election.
Fox reported that at a Monday meeting at the campaign’s headquarters, Stepien said, “[Trump] still is in this fight.”
Citing people in the room as sources, Fox reported Stepien added, “There is a process,” and further urged everyone to “have patience.”
For now, the only credible information about the campaign’s approach to the contested election seems to be on fighting the results in court in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan and other states.
The Trump campaign was hard at work on Monday in these states challenging the results and presenting evidence to prove alleged widespread discrepancies and irregularities with not only some ballots, but also with when some of these ballots arrived.
One noteworthy piece of information from the Axios report, though, does signal the establishment media is well aware of Trump's influence among core GOP voters.
The report, though, ignores inroads Trump has made with women and minority voters.
Axios reported that should Trump come up short after exhausting his legal remedies, he would be a force to be reckoned with, should he indeed throw his hat into the 2024 GOP primary.
Swan reported, “Aides advising Republicans who are likely to run in 2024 are dreading the prospect of a Trump run given the extraordinary sway he holds over millions of GOP voters.”
“Even four years after leaving office, he could remain formidable in a Republican primary," added the Axios reporter.
"That fact alone could freeze the ambitions, fundraising and staffing of individual candidates -- and of the Republican National Committee as it seeks to regroup and move beyond Trump.”
It is indeed difficult to imagine any scenario where Trump would not the undisputed leader of the Republican party, whether as a 2020 second term president or as a private citizen.
But the media's apparent desire to continue to prematurely call the current race should be disregarded for now.
The process will end up in the courts before the election is officially called, despite the mainstream media’s collective decision Saturday to announce Biden as the country's president-elect.
While that could end up being the case, Trump has given no indication that he intends to do anything other than fight to challenge the results of the disputed election in a number of battleground states where Biden's purported margins of victory are slim.
The coming court battles should play out before any premature speculation about Trump's reported thoughts on the 2024 primary, as he's still technically alive in the current race.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.


wnd--2020-11-10--Minority leader says Pelosi's tenure as House speaker ending

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy says Nancy Pelosi will not be elected speaker again if the same number of Democrats vote against her as they did after the 2018 midterms .
McCarthy noted in an interview with `` Sunday Morning Futures '' that a candidate needs 218 votes to win the post , but when Pelosi stood for election two years ago , there were 15 Democrats who voted against her .
`` Ten of those Democrats will be coming back to Congress .
If those 10 vote against her again , she will not be speaker of the House @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , '' he explained .
`` We are close enough now that we can control the floor with a few Democrats joining with us . ''
So far , Republicans have won at least seven seats previously held by Democrats and another from Michigan held by a Libertarian .
TRENDING : Trump releases defiant statement as Biden and media declare victory , vows to fight In 2018 , Pelosi got 220 votes for speaker and McCarthy received 192 .
`` Our vision for the next two years must be built on the success @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Congress , '' Pelosi said in a statement announcing she will run again .
`` And to harness the extraordinary visions , values and vibrancy of our Caucus to secure the progress that the American people deserve .
In that spirit , I am writing to request your support to be re-elected as speaker . ''
Four progressive Pelosi critics – Reps. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota , Alexandria Ocasio Cortez of New York , Rashida Tlaib of Michigan and Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts – were re-elected and may push for a more progressive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Last week , Pelosi was the target of `` yelling and crying lawmakers '' during a conference call among Democrats after Republicans made significant gains .
DailyMail.com reported that at an hours-long conference call leaked to the Capitol Hill press corps , Rep. Abigail Spanberger , D-Va. , who narrowly won a second term Tuesday , accused party leaders of caving to the far-left `` Squad , '' led by democratic socialist Cortez of New York .
`` We need to be pretty clear , it was a failure .
It was not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Congress , '' Spanberger said .
She charged the party 's advocacy for the radical Black Lives Matter agenda cost it dearly .
`` No one should say 'defund the police ' ever again .
Nobody should be talking about socialism , '' she said .
If the current tactics continue into 2022 , she said , `` we will get f -- -- -- torn apart . ''
Democrats expected to pick up five or more seats but may end up losing 10 .
DailyMail.com said : `` The call was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ became a bitch fest between the liberal wing of the party and its more moderate members – all of whom were disappointed by the Democrats failure to win more seats .
The party expected to pick up five or more on election night . ''
Pelosi also may face a challenge to her speakership from centrist Democrats , The Hill reported .
Two unidentified Democrats told the publication they were reaching out for thoughts on backing Rep. Hakeem Jeffries , D-N.Y. , even though he has rejected the idea .
`` He 's @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the job , one lawmaker said .
`` He bridges moderates and progressives better than anyone .
And most importantly , he 's not Nancy Pelosi . ''
One of the two lawmakers who spoke to The Hill said a number of Democrats representing suburban and exurban districts had been talking about the need for a change .
They said they had already spoken with dozens of members of the Congressional Black Caucus , Progressive Caucus , New Democrat Coalition and bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus .

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy says Nancy Pelosi will not be elected speaker again if the same number of Democrats vote against her as they did after the 2018 midterms.
McCarthy noted in an interview with "Sunday Morning Futures" that a candidate needs 218 votes to win the post, but when Pelosi stood for election two years ago, there were 15 Democrats who voted against her.
"Ten of those Democrats will be coming back to Congress. If those 10 vote against her again, she will not be speaker of the House because of the gains of the Republicans," he explained. "We are close enough now that we can control the floor with a few Democrats joining with us."
So far, Republicans have won at least seven seats previously held by Democrats and another from Michigan held by a Libertarian.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
In 2018, Pelosi got 220 votes for speaker and McCarthy received 192.
"Our vision for the next two years must be built on the success of Democratic House Majority in the 116th Congress," Pelosi said in a statement announcing she will run again. "And to harness the extraordinary visions, values and vibrancy of our Caucus to secure the progress that the American people deserve. In that spirit, I am writing to request your support to be re-elected as speaker."
Four progressive Pelosi critics – Reps. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, Alexandria Ocasio Cortez of New York, Rashida Tlaib of Michigan and Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts – were re-elected and may push for a more progressive speaker, the London Sun reported.
Last week, Pelosi was the target of "yelling and crying lawmakers" during a conference call among Democrats after Republicans made significant gains.
Should Nancy Pelosi be removed from her position as speaker of the House?from her position as speaker of the House? Yes No Completing this poll entitles you to WND news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use You're logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out. 98% (686 Votes) 2% (16 Votes)
DailyMail.com reported that at an hours-long conference call leaked to the Capitol Hill press corps, Rep. Abigail Spanberger, D-Va., who narrowly won a second term Tuesday, accused party leaders of caving to the far-left "Squad," led by democratic socialist Cortez of New York.
"We need to be pretty clear, it was a failure. It was not a success. We lost incredible members of Congress," Spanberger said.
She charged the party's advocacy for the radical Black Lives Matter agenda cost it dearly.
"No one should say 'defund the police' ever again. Nobody should be talking about socialism," she said. If the current tactics continue into 2022, she said, "we will get f------ torn apart."
Democrats expected to pick up five or more seats but may end up losing 10.
DailyMail.com said: "The call was billed as a 'family session' but became a bitch fest between the liberal wing of the party and its more moderate members – all of whom were disappointed by the Democrats failure to win more seats. The party expected to pick up five or more on election night."
Pelosi also may face a challenge to her speakership from centrist Democrats, The Hill reported.
Two unidentified Democrats told the publication they were reaching out for thoughts on backing Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., even though he has rejected the idea.
"He's the only one prepared and positioned" for the job, one lawmaker said. "He bridges moderates and progressives better than anyone. And most importantly, he's not Nancy Pelosi."
One of the two lawmakers who spoke to The Hill said a number of Democrats representing suburban and exurban districts had been talking about the need for a change.
They said they had already spoken with dozens of members of the Congressional Black Caucus, Progressive Caucus, New Democrat Coalition and bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus.


wnd--2020-11-10--Google caught reminding liberals, but not conservatives, to vote

The bias of Google against President Trump has been well documented over his nearly four years in office .
Recently a Google whistleblower told Project Veritas that Google News results `` are intentionally biased against him , '' with more than 90 % of political contributions from workers at Google parent Alphabet going to Democrats .
Now , Sens .
Ted Cruz , R-Texas , Ron Johnson , R-Wis. , and Mike Lee , R-Utah , have written to Google CEO Sundar Pichai demanding to know why his company was sending reminders to liberals to vote and not to conservatives @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cite Pichai 's claim before Congress in August that Google `` wo n't do any work , you know , to politically tilt anything one way or another . ''
TRENDING : Trump releases defiant statement as Biden and media declare victory , vows to fight However , the claims do n't align with evidence compiled by psychologist Robert Epstein .
The Harvard-trained researcher assembled a team of hundreds of monitors of Google who found from Oct. 26 to 29 that Google sent vote reminders to liberal users but not to conservative users @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Arizona , Florida and North Carolina were able `` to preserve more than 400,000 ephemeral experiences that tech companies use to shift opinions and votes and that normally are lost forever . ''
`` One of our most disturbing findings so far is that between Monday , October 26th ( the day our system became fully operational ) and Thursday , October 29th , only our liberal field agents received vote reminders on Google ’ s home page .
Conservatives did not receive even a single vote reminder , '' Epstein said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` This kind of targeting , if present nationwide , could shift millions of votes , in part because Google ’ s home page is seen 500 million times a day in the U.S. '' PJMedia said the pattern disappeared on Oct. 29 .
Epstein sent materials about the project to the New York Post 's Ebony Bowden , who wrote a story on it .
Late that evening , the Post pulled Bowden 's article and Google ’ s apparent targeting ceased .
In an interview with WND in July , Epstein @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the tech titans ' bias , derived from more than seven years of research , internal documents , emails , videos and the testimony of whistleblowers .
The senators told Pichai , `` Based on Dr. Epstein ’ s response , it would appear your assertion that 'We won ’ t do any work , you know , to politically tilt anything one way or the other ' is not true . ''
The senators said : `` We will be asking Dr. Epstein to provide Congress with the evidence of Google ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ during this election cycle .
We are writing to provide you another opportunity to conduct a thorough review with your management team to determine the veracity of your previous responses to the congressional inquiry regarding this issue , and correct your answers if necessary . ''
Epstein had warned Fox News ' Tucker Carlson just before the election that Google has a `` very substantial '' liberal bias and that could be used to `` swing '' 15 million votes .
At the time , Epstein said , that based on the data @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seeing a shift of about 15 million votes `` without anyone ’ s awareness and except for what I ’ m doing , without leaving a paper trail for authorities to trace . ''
PJ Media noted Epstein , who voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016 , has long warned of Google ’ s power to manipulate elections .
In 2017 , he wrote a white paper arguing that Clinton ’ s popular vote margin was almost entirely attributable to pro-Clinton bias at Google .
`` Without the pro-Clinton bias in Google ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the popular vote would have been negligible , '' Epstein wrote at the time .
PJMedia said the idea of Big Tech bias is even more troubling after Facebook and Twitter suppressed a bombshell New York Post story presenting evidence that Joe Biden was actively involved in Hunter Biden ’ s corrupt overseas dealings , even before it could be fact-checked .
More evidence has come to light , but establishment media continues to ignore the story .
WND reported Monday an Media Research Center poll indicated the effort to suppress the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

The bias of Google against President Trump has been well documented over his nearly four years in office.
Recently a Google whistleblower told Project Veritas that Google News results "are intentionally biased against him," with more than 90% of political contributions from workers at Google parent Alphabet going to Democrats.
Now, Sens. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, Ron Johnson, R-Wis., and Mike Lee, R-Utah, have written to Google CEO Sundar Pichai demanding to know why his company was sending reminders to liberals to vote and not to conservatives, PJ Media reported.
The senators cite Pichai's claim before Congress in August that Google "won't do any work, you know, to politically tilt anything one way or another."
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
However, the claims don't align with evidence compiled by psychologist Robert Epstein.
The Harvard-trained researcher assembled a team of hundreds of monitors of Google who found from Oct. 26 to 29 that Google sent vote reminders to liberal users but not to conservative users.
Epstein said his 733 field agents in Arizona, Florida and North Carolina were able "to preserve more than 400,000 ephemeral experiences that tech companies use to shift opinions and votes and that normally are lost forever."
"One of our most disturbing findings so far is that between Monday, October 26th (the day our system became fully operational) and Thursday, October 29th, only our liberal field agents received vote reminders on Google’s home page. Conservatives did not receive even a single vote reminder," Epstein said in a report to the senators. "This kind of targeting, if present nationwide, could shift millions of votes, in part because Google’s home page is seen 500 million times a day in the U.S."
PJMedia said the pattern disappeared on Oct. 29. Epstein sent materials about the project to the New York Post's Ebony Bowden, who wrote a story on it. Late that evening, the Post pulled Bowden's article and Google’s apparent targeting ceased.
In an interview with WND in July, Epstein discussed the statistical evidence he has of the tech titans' bias, derived from more than seven years of research, internal documents, emails, videos and the testimony of whistleblowers.
The senators told Pichai, "Based on Dr. Epstein’s response, it would appear your assertion that 'We won’t do any work, you know, to politically tilt anything one way or the other' is not true."
The senators said: "We will be asking Dr. Epstein to provide Congress with the evidence of Google’s politically biased activities his monitoring collected during this election cycle. We are writing to provide you another opportunity to conduct a thorough review with your management team to determine the veracity of your previous responses to the congressional inquiry regarding this issue, and correct your answers if necessary."
Epstein had warned Fox News' Tucker Carlson just before the election that Google has a "very substantial" liberal bias and that could be used to "swing" 15 million votes.
At the time, Epstein said, that based on the data his researchers were collecting, they were seeing a shift of about 15 million votes "without anyone’s awareness and except for what I’m doing, without leaving a paper trail for authorities to trace."
PJ Media noted Epstein, who voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016, has long warned of Google’s power to manipulate elections.
In 2017, he wrote a white paper arguing that Clinton’s popular vote margin was almost entirely attributable to pro-Clinton bias at Google.
"Without the pro-Clinton bias in Google’s search results, her win margin in the popular vote would have been negligible," Epstein wrote at the time.
PJMedia said the idea of Big Tech bias is even more troubling after Facebook and Twitter suppressed a bombshell New York Post story presenting evidence that Joe Biden was actively involved in Hunter Biden’s corrupt overseas dealings, even before it could be fact-checked.
More evidence has come to light, but establishment media continues to ignore the story.
WND reported Monday an Media Research Center poll indicated the effort to suppress the story may have handed Biden the election.