wnd--2020-09-13--Atlantic writer calls for ending Nobel Peace Prize after Trump nomination

First , an acknowledgement : The Nobel Peace Prize is a thoroughgoing joke that just gets more ridiculous .
It 's honored a pretty impressive roster of people , true , but we did n't need an award to recognize that Martin Luther King Jr. , Nelson Mandela , Elie Wiesel or Albert Schweitzer were awe-inspiring human beings .
On the other hand , the committee gave the imprimatur of the peace prize to war criminals like Yasser Arafat and Le Duc Tho , lumbering supranational bodies like the European Union and the United Nations , and other individuals of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Woodrow Wilson .
The committee 's recent use of the award to remark on American politics is a particular irritant .
In 2007 , Al Gore won the award because , for all intents and purposes , he made a movie about climate change .
That beats 2009 's winner , Barack Obama , who received the award for winning an election .
Jimmy Carter won it in 2002 `` for his decades of untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts , to advance democracy and human rights , and to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which was convenient timing given the United States and its allies were wrestling with a truculent regime in Baghdad at the time .
The peace prize has degraded to the point that Greta Thunberg was considered the favorite for last year 's award for skipping school and scolding adults ; the committee exercised a bit of sense at the last moment and gave it to the relatively more deserving Abiy Ahmed , the prime minister of Ethiopia .
Still , when oddsmakers are surprised a Nordic teenager with a good nose for publicity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should be a sign things are amiss in Oslo .
Now that President Donald Trump has been nominated for the peace prize because of his role brokering a peace deal between Israel and the United Arab Emirates , Graeme Wood has suddenly come to the convenient conclusion that it 's time to abolish the award .
If you 're unfamiliar , Wood is usually one of the more tolerable writers in The Atlantic 's stable .
I 'm not a fan of his politics , but stylistically , he 's excellent .
He @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , `` The Way of the Strangers : Encounters with the Islamic State . ''
His denunciation of far-left author Vicky Osterweil 's recent book `` In Defense of Looting '' is one of the best treatments of that dismal subject and deserves a read .
Wood had a conniption when Norwegian parliamentarian Christian Tybring-Gjedde nominated Trump for the award .
The conservative lawmaker said he was n't `` a big Trump supporter '' but that `` [ t ] he committee should look at the facts and judge him on the facts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sometimes .
The people who have received the Peace Prize in recent years have done much less than Donald Trump .
For example , Barack Obama did nothing . ''
Wood did n't take kindly to this , as shown by the simple title of his Friday piece : `` End the Nobel Peace Prize . ''
`` Trolls are a Scandinavian invention , straight from the frigid sagas of Norse mythology , '' Wood began his article , `` but Christian Tybring-Gjedde , a Norwegian parliamentarian , swears that he is not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ week could be forgiven for thinking otherwise . ''
He went on to note that the committee had , on occasion , not given out any prize .
( The most recent occasion for this was in 1972 . )
He thinks that ought to happen again because the Orange Man was nominated .
`` Giving the peace prize to no one at all is a tradition the Nobel Committee should revive , perhaps on a permanent basis .
The record of achievement of the peace laureates is so spotty , and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the committee should take a long break to consider whether peace is a category coherent enough to be worth recognizing , '' Wood wrote .
`` Peace had its chance , and blew it .
The Trump nomination -- one of hundreds , including this second from a Swede -- helps show why . ''
The second one , I assume , is Trump 's second nomination for the prize , this time from Swedish parliamentarian Magnus Jacobsson in recognition of the president 's separate role brokering a deal between Serbia and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who argued that Trump 's troop withdrawals from Iraq and Afghanistan met the prize 's criteria for “ the abolition or reduction of standing armies '' even as he built up the U.S. military .
`` He admitted that Trump won ’ t win the prize , if only because of the man ’ s vulgarity and crude behavior , '' Wood wrote , before quoting Tybring-Gjedde : “ I know a couple of [ the five members of the committee ] , ” the parliamentarian told Wood .
“ And they are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ certain way .
It ’ s not like chemistry -- if they find out you have four divorces and are bad personally , they will never not give you the chemistry prize for that.
” So , naturally , Wood thinks it 's time to abolish the prize .
`` By now the contradictions of the peace prize should be apparent .
Is it given for peace , or for rumors of peace ?
Do you deserve a prize for maintaining despots , as long as the despots are part of a stable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wrecking a great military -- or only if the destruction is intentional ? ''
Wood wrote .
`` What if you do all the right things , but you are a boor , or an alleged rapist ?
To these questions one might add a counsel of humility : If you have given the prize to enablers of genocide , kleptocrats , serial fabricators , and AIDS conspiracists , maybe you should sit out the next few rounds . ''
Wood was likely referring to four other problematic winners : Burmese democracy campaigner @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been criticized for her relative silence in the face of the country 's campaign of genocide ; Yasser Arafat , whose rule of Palestine was marred by his arrant kleptocracy ; Rigoberta Menchu , the Guatemalan indigenous campaigner who won the award in 1992 and eventually had her backstory dismantled ; and Wangari Maathai , the Kenyan ecologist who won the award in 2004 and believes AIDS is a biological agent .
Wood wrote that the prize `` has always been subjective '' but that `` its incoherence has become too great .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ incentivize peace , if one year you give it to [ Henry ] Kissinger ( starter of many conflicts , ender of one ) , and another you give it to Mother Teresa ( who never started a war , but who -- as Christopher Hitchens liked to point out -- used her Nobel lecture to inform the world that the 'greatest destroyer of world peace ' was abortion ) , '' he wrote .
`` Tybring-Gjedde suggests that brief conversations with hideous men are a reason to award the prize , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right .
Then again , Barack Obama won the prize in 2009 , while refusing to meet with Kim Jong-il and , by the way , expanding America ’ s drone program .
( He won for his promotion of , notably not his success in achieving , 'cooperation between peoples . '
) '' All of this has been well-known for a while , mind you ; noted Mother Teresa- and Henry Kissinger-hater Christopher Hitchens , who Wood name-checked , has been dead for almost a decade and spent the better part @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Menchu was exposed over 20 years ago and Maathai began getting Infowars-y on HIV/AIDS over 15 years ago .
Yasser Arafat was always sick joke of a man , no matter how many people refused to see it .
So , why now ?
Wood makes it clear he thinks the award is getting too political , but it 's interesting to see him come to this conclusion so recently .
For him , the Nobel committee is left with two choices : Either it can give the award to one of those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the prize locked away for a while , and reevaluate its reasoning for a modern era .
`` I suspect that that reevaluation will end , if the committee is honest , with the admission that peace can be recognized only by its fruits , which take decades to mature , and not by its seeds .
To keep giving awards for the seeds is to court embarrassment , and to make yourself hostage to wacky attention-seeking nominations like Trump ’ s .
Better to shut it down , before the trolls do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Barack Obama , again , had done nothing but spend four years in the Senate and win a national election when he was awarded his 2009 Nobel Peace Prize .
Wood has come up with nothing new about the fatuousness of the prize , merely that he 's just been awakened ( dare I say `` woked ? ''
) to the senselessness of it all because someone nominated President Trump for the award .
At least Trump did something before he was nominated -- and he still wo n't win .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wood 's hackles , however .
I 'm sure there 's a lesson here about the politicization of the Nobel Peace Prize process , but darned if I can find it .
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal .

First, an acknowledgement: The Nobel Peace Prize is a thoroughgoing joke that just gets more ridiculous.
It's honored a pretty impressive roster of people, true, but we didn't need an award to recognize that Martin Luther King Jr., Nelson Mandela, Elie Wiesel or Albert Schweitzer were awe-inspiring human beings.
On the other hand, the committee gave the imprimatur of the peace prize to war criminals like Yasser Arafat and Le Duc Tho, lumbering supranational bodies like the European Union and the United Nations, and other individuals of questionable deservedness, like Mikhail Gorbachev and Woodrow Wilson.
The committee's recent use of the award to remark on American politics is a particular irritant.
In 2007, Al Gore won the award because, for all intents and purposes, he made a movie about climate change. That beats 2009's winner, Barack Obama, who received the award for winning an election.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
Jimmy Carter won it in 2002 "for his decades of untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts, to advance democracy and human rights, and to promote economic and social development," which was convenient timing given the United States and its allies were wrestling with a truculent regime in Baghdad at the time.
The peace prize has degraded to the point that Greta Thunberg was considered the favorite for last year's award for skipping school and scolding adults; the committee exercised a bit of sense at the last moment and gave it to the relatively more deserving Abiy Ahmed, the prime minister of Ethiopia.
Still, when oddsmakers are surprised a Nordic teenager with a good nose for publicity didn't win the award, that should be a sign things are amiss in Oslo.
Now that President Donald Trump has been nominated for the peace prize because of his role brokering a peace deal between Israel and the United Arab Emirates, Graeme Wood has suddenly come to the convenient conclusion that it's time to abolish the award.
If you're unfamiliar, Wood is usually one of the more tolerable writers in The Atlantic's stable. I'm not a fan of his politics, but stylistically, he's excellent. He's the author of an admirable tome, "The Way of the Strangers: Encounters with the Islamic State." His denunciation of far-left author Vicky Osterweil's recent book "In Defense of Looting" is one of the best treatments of that dismal subject and deserves a read.
Wood had a conniption when Norwegian parliamentarian Christian Tybring-Gjedde nominated Trump for the award. The conservative lawmaker said he wasn't "a big Trump supporter" but that "[t]he committee should look at the facts and judge him on the facts -- not on the way he behaves sometimes. The people who have received the Peace Prize in recent years have done much less than Donald Trump. For example, Barack Obama did nothing."
Wood didn't take kindly to this, as shown by the simple title of his Friday piece: "End the Nobel Peace Prize."
"Trolls are a Scandinavian invention, straight from the frigid sagas of Norse mythology," Wood began his article, "but Christian Tybring-Gjedde, a Norwegian parliamentarian, swears that he is not one. Observers of his antics this week could be forgiven for thinking otherwise."
He went on to note that the committee had, on occasion, not given out any prize. (The most recent occasion for this was in 1972.) He thinks that ought to happen again because the Orange Man was nominated.
"Giving the peace prize to no one at all is a tradition the Nobel Committee should revive, perhaps on a permanent basis. The record of achievement of the peace laureates is so spotty, and the rationales for their awards so eclectic, that the committee should take a long break to consider whether peace is a category coherent enough to be worth recognizing," Wood wrote.
"Peace had its chance, and blew it. The Trump nomination -- one of hundreds, including this second from a Swede -- helps show why."
The second one, I assume, is Trump's second nomination for the prize, this time from Swedish parliamentarian Magnus Jacobsson in recognition of the president's separate role brokering a deal between Serbia and Kosovo.
I have nominated the US Gov. and the governments of Kosovo and Serbia for the Nobel Peace Prize for their joint work for peace and economic development, through the cooperation agreement signed in the White House. Trade and communications are important building blocks for peace. pic.twitter.com/XuhkLbHZAV — Magnus Jacobsson (@magnusjacobsson) September 11, 2020
Wood talked with Tybring-Gjedde, who argued that Trump's troop withdrawals from Iraq and Afghanistan met the prize's criteria for “the abolition or reduction of standing armies" even as he built up the U.S. military.
"He admitted that Trump won’t win the prize, if only because of the man’s vulgarity and crude behavior," Wood wrote, before quoting Tybring-Gjedde: “I know a couple of [the five members of the committee],” the parliamentarian told Wood.
“And they are looking for people who should behave a certain way. It’s not like chemistry -- if they find out you have four divorces and are bad personally, they will never not give you the chemistry prize for that.”
So, naturally, Wood thinks it's time to abolish the prize.
"By now the contradictions of the peace prize should be apparent. Is it given for peace, or for rumors of peace? Do you deserve a prize for maintaining despots, as long as the despots are part of a stable network? Is it given for accidentally wrecking a great military -- or only if the destruction is intentional?" Wood wrote.
"What if you do all the right things, but you are a boor, or an alleged rapist? To these questions one might add a counsel of humility: If you have given the prize to enablers of genocide, kleptocrats, serial fabricators, and AIDS conspiracists, maybe you should sit out the next few rounds."
Wood was likely referring to four other problematic winners: Burmese democracy campaigner Aung San Suu Kyi, who has been criticized for her relative silence in the face of the country's campaign of genocide; Yasser Arafat, whose rule of Palestine was marred by his arrant kleptocracy; Rigoberta Menchu, the Guatemalan indigenous campaigner who won the award in 1992 and eventually had her backstory dismantled; and Wangari Maathai, the Kenyan ecologist who won the award in 2004 and believes AIDS is a biological agent.
Should President Trump win the Nobel Peace Prize? Yes No Completing this poll entitles you to WND news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use You're logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out. 100% (40 Votes) 0% (0 Votes)
Wood wrote that the prize "has always been subjective" but that "its incoherence has become too great."
"The honor doesn’t incentivize peace, if one year you give it to [Henry] Kissinger (starter of many conflicts, ender of one), and another you give it to Mother Teresa (who never started a war, but who -- as Christopher Hitchens liked to point out -- used her Nobel lecture to inform the world that the 'greatest destroyer of world peace' was abortion)," he wrote.
"Tybring-Gjedde suggests that brief conversations with hideous men are a reason to award the prize, and its history suggests that he might be right. Then again, Barack Obama won the prize in 2009, while refusing to meet with Kim Jong-il and, by the way, expanding America’s drone program. (He won for his promotion of, notably not his success in achieving, 'cooperation between peoples.')"
All of this has been well-known for a while, mind you; noted Mother Teresa- and Henry Kissinger-hater Christopher Hitchens, who Wood name-checked, has been dead for almost a decade and spent the better part of his career railing against them. Menchu was exposed over 20 years ago and Maathai began getting Infowars-y on HIV/AIDS over 15 years ago. Yasser Arafat was always sick joke of a man, no matter how many people refused to see it.
So, why now? Wood makes it clear he thinks the award is getting too political, but it's interesting to see him come to this conclusion so recently.
For him, the Nobel committee is left with two choices: Either it can give the award to one of those supranational organizations "or it can keep the prize locked away for a while, and reevaluate its reasoning for a modern era.
"I suspect that that reevaluation will end, if the committee is honest, with the admission that peace can be recognized only by its fruits, which take decades to mature, and not by its seeds. To keep giving awards for the seeds is to court embarrassment, and to make yourself hostage to wacky attention-seeking nominations like Trump’s. Better to shut it down, before the trolls do first."
Too late for that.
Barack Obama, again, had done nothing but spend four years in the Senate and win a national election when he was awarded his 2009 Nobel Peace Prize.
Wood has come up with nothing new about the fatuousness of the prize, merely that he's just been awakened (dare I say "woked?") to the senselessness of it all because someone nominated President Trump for the award.
At least Trump did something before he was nominated -- and he still won't win.
The mere nomination is enough to raise Wood's hackles, however. I'm sure there's a lesson here about the politicization of the Nobel Peace Prize process, but darned if I can find it.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.


wnd--2020-09-14--Poll: More voters call 'Black Lives Matter' events riots than protests

( WASHINGTON EXAMINER ) -- More voters consider Black Lives Matter demonstrations in three cities to be riots instead of @ @ @ @ @ Fox News poll released Sunday .
The poll found that 48 % of likely voters @ @ @ @ @ York , Portland , and Kenosha , Wisconsin , as riots , while 40 % @ @ @ @ @ .
The poll also broke down views based on political affiliation , with 68 % @ @ @ @ @ riots .
Only 30 % of Democrats said the same .

(WASHINGTON EXAMINER) -- More voters consider Black Lives Matter demonstrations in three cities to be riots instead of protests, according to a Fox News poll released Sunday.
The poll found that 48% of likely voters viewed the demonstrations in New York, Portland, and Kenosha, Wisconsin, as riots, while 40% viewed the demonstrations as protests.
The poll also broke down views based on political affiliation, with 68% of Republicans calling the demonstrations riots. Only 30% of Democrats said the same.
Read the full story ›


wnd--2020-09-14--Pastor promises local officials he's keeping church open despite regulations

( WASHINGTON EXAMINER ) -- As churches and governments battle over pandemic restrictions on services , both sides are digging @ @ @ @ @ decisive victory .
This week , a pastor at North Valley Baptist Church in Santa @ @ @ @ @ that the county had saddled him with more than $ 100,000 in fines for holding @ @ @ @ @ which are forbidden by Gov .
Gavin Newsom ’ s July coronavirus guidelines .
The @ @ @ @ @ demanded that the county remove the fines , saying that church funds are “ God @ @ @ @ @ We are not closing down this church .
I hope you get this message , @ @ @ @ @ Tuesday video directed at Santa Clara officials .

(WASHINGTON EXAMINER) -- As churches and governments battle over pandemic restrictions on services, both sides are digging in their heels for a decisive victory.
This week, a pastor at North Valley Baptist Church in Santa Clara, California, announced that the county had saddled him with more than $100,000 in fines for holding indoor services with singing, which are forbidden by Gov. Gavin Newsom’s July coronavirus guidelines. The pastor, Jack Trieber, demanded that the county remove the fines, saying that church funds are “God’s money.”
“We are not closing down this church. I hope you get this message,” Trieber said in a Tuesday video directed at Santa Clara officials.
Read the full story ›


wnd--2020-09-15--Pastor and wife flee for lives after 15-year sentence for celebrating Christmas

( ACLJ ) -- A Christian pastor and his wife are running for their lives after being arrested and SENTENCED @ @ @ @ @ , among other Christian traditions .
Iranian-Assyrian Christian Pastor Victor Bet-Tamraz , 66 , was @ @ @ @ @ prison , and his wife Shamiram Issavi , 65 , was sentenced to 5 years @ @ @ @ @ . )
Bet-Tamraz and other Christians were arrested on Dec. 26 , 2014 .
What @ @ @ @ @ earned them a stay in Iran ’ s infamous Evin Prison – the Iranian penitentiary @ @ @ @ @ ” ?
Holding a gathering to celebrate the Christmas holiday .
The arresting officers reportedly @ @ @ @ @ arrested for participating in an “ unlawful and unauthorized gathering ” :

(ACLJ) -- A Christian pastor and his wife are running for their lives after being arrested and SENTENCED TO PRISON FOR CELEBRATING CHRISTMAS, among other Christian traditions.
Iranian-Assyrian Christian Pastor Victor Bet-Tamraz, 66, was sentenced to 10 years in prison, and his wife Shamiram Issavi, 65, was sentenced to 5 years (image source: Article18.) Bet-Tamraz and other Christians were arrested on Dec. 26, 2014. What was the heinous crime that earned them a stay in Iran’s infamous Evin Prison – the Iranian penitentiary labeled “a torture factory”? Holding a gathering to celebrate the Christmas holiday.
The arresting officers reportedly told them they were being arrested for participating in an “unlawful and unauthorized gathering”:
Read the full story ›


wnd--2020-09-15--Nation's rulers removing Islam as 'official state religion'

Sudan 's transitional government has agreed to eliminate Islamic law , or Shariah , separating religion from government .
Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok reached the accord with the leader of the Sudan People 's Liberation Movement-North , Abdelaziz Al-Hilu .
The deal was brokered by the executive director of the World Food Program , David Beasley .
The agreement , to be signed later this week in the Ethiopian capital , Addis Ababa , ends 30 years of Shariah as the governing law in Sudan .
TRENDING : Cops say man paid $ 500 to BUY girl as sex slave @ @ @ @ @ @ @ official religion , '' the agreement specifies .
`` No citizen shall be discriminated against based on their religion . ''
`` For Sudan to become a democratic country where the rights of all citizens are enshrined , the constitution should be based on the principle of 'separation of religion and state , ' in the absence of which the right to self-determination must be respected . ''
The global Christian charity Barnabas Fund explained the deal came less than two weeks after the government signed a peace accord with an alliance of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of conflict in Darfur and the border states of Blue Nile and South Kordofan , which left hundreds of thousands dead and millions more displaced .
Shariah had been established under dictator Omar al-Bashir , who was removed from office by the military in April 2019 .
In April 2020 , the nation 's apostasy law , which carried the death penalty for leaving Islam , was abolished .
Middle East Eye reported the plan to eliminate Shariah has caused conflict among civilian and military members of the transitional Sovereignty Council of Sudan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the participation of several rebel groups in the committees established after al-Bashir fell .
One of the issues is the recognition and accommodation of different racial , ethnic , religious and cultural groups .
The agreement states , `` Freedom of belief and worship and religious practice shall be granted in full to all Sudanese citizens . ''
Significantly , the parties agreed to stop hostilities until security arrangements are in place .
The Middle East Monitor said noted that under the new leadership , Sudan is emerging from international isolation .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ list of state sponsors of terrorism since 1993 .
The report said the U.S. has conditioned Sudan 's removal from the list on its normalization of diplomatic ties with Israel .
Israel 's Mossad chief is believed to have met with a top Sudanese official in the UAE .
Islamic leaders in Sudan have openly opposed the changes , insisting that the government continue to ban other religions .

Sudan's transitional government has agreed to eliminate Islamic law, or Shariah, separating religion from government.
Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok reached the accord with the leader of the Sudan People's Liberation Movement-North, Abdelaziz Al-Hilu. The deal was brokered by the executive director of the World Food Program, David Beasley.
The agreement, to be signed later this week in the Ethiopian capital, Addis Ababa, ends 30 years of Shariah as the governing law in Sudan.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
"The state shall not establish an official religion," the agreement specifies. "No citizen shall be discriminated against based on their religion."
"For Sudan to become a democratic country where the rights of all citizens are enshrined, the constitution should be based on the principle of 'separation of religion and state,' in the absence of which the right to self-determination must be respected."
The global Christian charity Barnabas Fund explained the deal came less than two weeks after the government signed a peace accord with an alliance of rebel groups.
The accord ended decades of conflict in Darfur and the border states of Blue Nile and South Kordofan, which left hundreds of thousands dead and millions more displaced.
Shariah had been established under dictator Omar al-Bashir, who was removed from office by the military in April 2019.
In April 2020, the nation's apostasy law, which carried the death penalty for leaving Islam, was abolished.
Middle East Eye reported the plan to eliminate Shariah has caused conflict among civilian and military members of the transitional Sovereignty Council of Sudan.
One of the arguments is over the participation of several rebel groups in the committees established after al-Bashir fell.
One of the issues is the recognition and accommodation of different racial, ethnic, religious and cultural groups.
The agreement states, "Freedom of belief and worship and religious practice shall be granted in full to all Sudanese citizens."
Significantly, the parties agreed to stop hostilities until security arrangements are in place.
The Middle East Monitor said noted that under the new leadership, Sudan is emerging from international isolation. The African nation has been on the U.S. list of state sponsors of terrorism since 1993.
The report said the U.S. has conditioned Sudan's removal from the list on its normalization of diplomatic ties with Israel. Israel's Mossad chief is believed to have met with a top Sudanese official in the UAE.
The UAE recently established diplomatic relations with Israel.
Islamic leaders in Sudan have openly opposed the changes, insisting that the government continue to ban other religions.


wnd--2020-09-15--Atlantic writer: Trump win would trigger violence by Dems unwilling to accept defeat

Several warnings already have been issued that more violence is coming to America if President Trump is reelected .
Now , a contributing writer for The Atlantic is doubling down , writing on Twitter that `` even strictly law-and-order Republicans have an interest in Biden winning . ''
Why would Republicans want to elect a Democrat ?
Mass unrest would ensue with a Trump victory , because the left will have `` difficulty accepting the results , '' wrote Shadi Hamid in a tweet he later removed .
TRENDING : Cops say man paid $ 500 to BUY girl as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the blog Twitchy , which also posted a later tweet from Hamid promoting his article in The Atlantic .
`` Try imagining how millions of Democrats will process a Trump victory , '' Hamid wrote .
`` A loss for Biden , after having been the clear favorite all summer , would provoke mass disillusion with electoral politics as a means of change .
No one should want that . ''
`` If Democrats ca n't beat a candidate as unpopular as Trump during a devastating pandemic and a massive economic contraction @ @ @ @ @ @ @ winning presidential elections anymore ? ''
The Twitchy blogger noted `` the left has gotten it into their heads that threatening Americans with more violence if they don ’ t vote the way they want them to seems like a winning strategy . ''
One Twitter user wrote : `` So , vote for Biden or his brown-shirts will burn the country down ?
I would recommend you rethink that threat . ''
Hamid wrote in his article that he 's `` truly worried '' about the possibility of Trump winning and that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will be unwilling , even unable , to accept the result . ''
He pointed out that Democrats `` had enough trouble accepting the results of the 2016 election . ''
`` They never really came to terms . ''
He explained the left 's thinking : `` How could so many of their fellow Americans side with a racist and a fabulist , someone so callous and seemingly without empathy ?
It was easier to think that those Americans had been lackeys , manipulated and deceived , or that they simply hadn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them .
Moreover , the Russians had interfered , and tipped the balance in an extremely close election through propaganda , fake news , and collusion with the Trump campaign .
Perhaps , as former Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid suggested , the Russians had even tampered with the vote itself . ''
But he said 2020 `` would be worse . ''
Biden 's poll numbers mostly have been higher than Hillary Clinton 's were in 2016 , but recently , he and other analysts have started panicking .
`` Democrats have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he said .
A Trump re-election `` has implications for mass unrest and political violence across American cities . ''
Similar statements were made in a guest op-ed by Georgetown Univeristy professor Rosa Brooks published by the Washington Post .
Talk-radio host Rush Limbaugh said not only is the Post trying to `` frighten '' voters into opposing the president , `` they 're threatening you . ''
Brooks is the convener of the Transition Integrity Project , which describes itself as a bipartisan group of more than 100 current and former senior @ @ @ @ @ @ @ journalists , polling experts and former federal and state government officials formed out of concern about potential disruptions to 2020 United States presidential election and transition by the RNC .
Limbaugh explained that Brooks built a series of `` war games , '' gathered contributors and then imagined what would happen in a range of election scenarios .
`` A landslide for Joe Biden resulted in a relatively orderly transfer of power , '' Limbaugh said of the results .
`` Every other scenario that she war-gamed involved street-level violence and political crisis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that peace will come after months of unrest only if Biden wins in a landslide .
`` And what they want you to believe is that you ’ ll just help get rid of Trump and all this other stuff will go away , that they ’ ll open up the restaurants in New York and they ’ ll open up California and they ’ ll stop whatever they ’ re doing in Washington and Oregon , and everything will go back to normal if you elect Biden , '' he said .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ you ’ re supposed to infer , is that if Trump wins reelection , this stuff ’ s only gon na get worse .
It ’ s up to you , it ’ s up to you , America .
Do you want your country constantly in chaos ?
Do you want the radical left taking over ?
If you do , then you just keep supporting Donald Trump .
`` They ’ re just coming right out and telling you now that if Biden does not win , and in a landslide @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it better be no question about it , if Biden doesn ’ t win in a landslide , then your country is going to be violent , violent , violent 24/7 .
And they published this at the Washington Post , which means they stand behind it . ''
Limbaugh said the message is : `` Biden has to win and in a landslide .
Otherwise there is peace for nobody . ''
Also , a coalition of progressive groups supporting the Democratic Party are planning to `` threaten their way to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Beacon 's editorial board .
The SEIU , AFT , Color of Change , Indivisible , MoveOn , Demos and others are organizing for `` mass public unrest , '' according to the Daily Beast .
`` Occupy s -- - , hold space , and shut things down , not just on Election Day but for weeks , '' the groups instruct .
The Free Beacon observed that only `` a fool would think that this 'nonviolent civil disobedience ' will stay nonviolent after a summer that 's seen over 500 riots @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2000 we had the Brooks Brothers riot ; in 2020 , Democrats are promising the real deal . ''
The plan revealed to `` a sympathetic outlet '' is the `` latest example of the left 's campaign of extortion : If you want the protesting , rioting , and murder wave to end , all you have to do is hand Joe Biden a landslide , '' the editors wrote .
`` The organizations claim to be preparing for an election 'without a clear outcome , ' or the possibility that President @ @ @ @ @ @ @ course , they have also worked to assure an ambiguous election night by pressing for a massive , disorganized switch to mail-in voting , even as public health experts say in-person voting is as safe as grocery shopping , '' the editorial said .
`` Both the promised unrest and the scaremongering over the possibility Trump will not concede are part of the same drumbeat that Democrats have marched to over the past four years : Trump , and indeed the entire GOP , are not just bad but illegitimate . ''
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Joe Biden not to concede , no matter what .
But the Democrats want to convince voters of a looming coup d'etat , and the danger is an `` act of treason '' by Democrats , the Free Beacon editors contended .
Democrats are ginning up a variety of unsettling and unlikely scenarios `` because their electoral strategy is to use these as an excuse to threaten more rioting in the streets – whatever they need to do to retake power . ''
It 's really `` a campaign by insurgent ideological groups @ @ @ @ @ @ @ victory '' and `` nothing less than electoral terrorism . ''

Several warnings already have been issued that more violence is coming to America if President Trump is reelected.
Now, a contributing writer for The Atlantic is doubling down, writing on Twitter that "even strictly law-and-order Republicans have an interest in Biden winning."
Why would Republicans want to elect a Democrat?
Mass unrest would ensue with a Trump victory, because the left will have "difficulty accepting the results," wrote Shadi Hamid in a tweet he later removed.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
The deleted tweet was captured by the blog Twitchy, which also posted a later tweet from Hamid promoting his article in The Atlantic.
"Try imagining how millions of Democrats will process a Trump victory," Hamid wrote. "A loss for Biden, after having been the clear favorite all summer, would provoke mass disillusion with electoral politics as a means of change. No one should want that."
Try imagining how millions of Democrats will process a Trump victory. A loss for Biden, after having been the clear favorite all summer, would provoke mass disillusion with electoral politics as a means of change. No one should want thathttps://t.co/i6YrArSlhI pic.twitter.com/CF6Ul7tTRw — Shadi Hamid (@shadihamid) September 13, 2020
Will leftists continue their violence if Trump wins reelection? Yes No Completing this poll entitles you to WND news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use You're logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out. 98% (57 Votes) 2% (1 Votes)
"If Democrats can't beat a candidate as unpopular as Trump during a devastating pandemic and a massive economic contraction, then are they even capable of winning presidential elections anymore?"
The Twitchy blogger noted "the left has gotten it into their heads that threatening Americans with more violence if they don’t vote the way they want them to seems like a winning strategy."
One Twitter user wrote: "So, vote for Biden or his brown-shirts will burn the country down? I would recommend you rethink that threat."
Hamid wrote in his article that he's "truly worried" about the possibility of Trump winning and that "Democrats and others on the left will be unwilling, even unable, to accept the result."
He pointed out that Democrats "had enough trouble accepting the results of the 2016 election."
"They never really came to terms."
He explained the left's thinking: "How could so many of their fellow Americans side with a racist and a fabulist, someone so callous and seemingly without empathy? It was easier to think that those Americans had been lackeys, manipulated and deceived, or that they simply hadn’t understood what was best for them. Moreover, the Russians had interfered, and tipped the balance in an extremely close election through propaganda, fake news, and collusion with the Trump campaign. Perhaps, as former Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid suggested, the Russians had even tampered with the vote itself."
But he said 2020 "would be worse."
Biden's poll numbers mostly have been higher than Hillary Clinton's were in 2016, but recently, he and other analysts have started panicking.
"Democrats have every right to be nervous," he said.
A Trump re-election "has implications for mass unrest and political violence across American cities."
Similar statements were made in a guest op-ed by Georgetown Univeristy professor Rosa Brooks published by the Washington Post.
Talk-radio host Rush Limbaugh said not only is the Post trying to "frighten" voters into opposing the president, "they're threatening you."
Brooks is the convener of the Transition Integrity Project, which describes itself as a bipartisan group of more than 100 current and former senior government and campaign leaders, academics, journalists, polling experts and former federal and state government officials formed out of concern about potential disruptions to 2020 United States presidential election and transition by the RNC.
Limbaugh explained that Brooks built a series of "war games," gathered contributors and then imagined what would happen in a range of election scenarios.
"A landslide for Joe Biden resulted in a relatively orderly transfer of power," Limbaugh said of the results. "Every other scenario that she war-gamed involved street-level violence and political crisis."
He said the implication is that peace will come after months of unrest only if Biden wins in a landslide.
"And what they want you to believe is that you’ll just help get rid of Trump and all this other stuff will go away, that they’ll open up the restaurants in New York and they’ll open up California and they’ll stop whatever they’re doing in Washington and Oregon, and everything will go back to normal if you elect Biden," he said. "Also implied in this, what you’re supposed to infer, is that if Trump wins reelection, this stuff’s only gonna get worse. It’s up to you, it’s up to you, America. Do you want your country constantly in chaos? Do you want the radical left taking over? If you do, then you just keep supporting Donald Trump.
"They’re just coming right out and telling you now that if Biden does not win, and in a landslide, meaning it better be doubtless, it better be no question about it, if Biden doesn’t win in a landslide, then your country is going to be violent, violent, violent 24/7. And they published this at the Washington Post, which means they stand behind it."
Limbaugh said the message is: "Biden has to win and in a landslide. Otherwise there is peace for nobody."
Also, a coalition of progressive groups supporting the Democratic Party are planning to "threaten their way to the White House, warned the Washington Free Beacon's editorial board.
The SEIU, AFT, Color of Change, Indivisible, MoveOn, Demos and others are organizing for "mass public unrest," according to the Daily Beast.
"Occupy s---, hold space, and shut things down, not just on Election Day but for weeks," the groups instruct.
The Free Beacon observed that only "a fool would think that this 'nonviolent civil disobedience' will stay nonviolent after a summer that's seen over 500 riots across the nation."
"In 2000 we had the Brooks Brothers riot; in 2020, Democrats are promising the real deal."
The plan revealed to "a sympathetic outlet" is the "latest example of the left's campaign of extortion: If you want the protesting, rioting, and murder wave to end, all you have to do is hand Joe Biden a landslide," the editors wrote.
"The organizations claim to be preparing for an election 'without a clear outcome,' or the possibility that President Donald Trump refuses to concede. Of course, they have also worked to assure an ambiguous election night by pressing for a massive, disorganized switch to mail-in voting, even as public health experts say in-person voting is as safe as grocery shopping," the editorial said.
"Both the promised unrest and the scaremongering over the possibility Trump will not concede are part of the same drumbeat that Democrats have marched to over the past four years: Trump, and indeed the entire GOP, are not just bad but illegitimate."
It's why Hillary Clinton already has told Joe Biden not to concede, no matter what.
But the Democrats want to convince voters of a looming coup d'etat, and the danger is an "act of treason" by Democrats, the Free Beacon editors contended.
Democrats are ginning up a variety of unsettling and unlikely scenarios "because their electoral strategy is to use these as an excuse to threaten more rioting in the streets – whatever they need to do to retake power."
It's really "a campaign by insurgent ideological groups to threaten and intimidate their way to victory" and "nothing less than electoral terrorism."


wnd--2020-09-15--Black Lives Matter protesters chant 'F*** your Jesus'

A black street preacher in Charlotte , North Carolina , declaring `` Jesus saves '' was attacked by a mob @ @ @ @ @ '' The confrontation took placing during Republican National Convention events in the city in August @ @ @ @ @ and spotlighted Monday by the Gateway Pundit .
See the video of marchers : TRENDING @ @ @ @ @ $ 500 to BUY girl as sex slave See the attack on the preacher :

A black street preacher in Charlotte, North Carolina, declaring "Jesus saves" was attacked by a mob shouting "F*** Jesus."
The confrontation took placing during Republican National Convention events in the city in August but was ignored by media and spotlighted Monday by the Gateway Pundit.
See the video of marchers:
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
See the attack on the preacher:


wnd--2020-09-15--CDC plans 'critical race theory' training despite Trump ban

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is moving ahead with a `` critical race theory '' training program in violation of President Trump 's recent executive order .
Christopher Rufo , the director of the Discovery Institute 's Center on Wealth and Poverty in Seattle , said he 's obtained leaked documents that outline the CDC 's plan to `` examine the mechanisms of systemic racism '' and address `` White supremacist ideology . ''
`` The final session teaches CDC employees how to become activists , '' he said in a thread on Twitter .
The employees will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Collaborative with eight Collective Action Teams '' focused on `` communications , '' making scientific publications `` anti-racist '' and influencing `` policy and legislation . ''
TRENDING : Cops say man paid $ 500 to BUY girl as sex slave In general terms , critical race theory is a post-modern theoretical framework rooted in Marxist principles that views individuals through the lens of oppressed or oppressor based largely on their skin color .
Rufo said the unnamed whistleblower who provided him with the documents is outraged .
`` I thought maybe they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ '' the whistleblower said .
`` The pressure to participate is palpable , and if you do n't you will have to explain why you are n't a racist , '' the whistleblower said .
The White House announced Sept. 4 the Trump administration is halting critical race theory training in federal agencies , calling it `` anti-American propaganda . ''
`` This is a sickness that can not be allowed to continue , ” President Trump tweeted .
“ Please report any sightings so we can quickly extinguish !
” Russ Vought @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Budget , wrote a memo informing agencies of Trump 's instruction to stop using controversial forms of training and to stop trainining on `` critical race theory , '' `` white privilege '' and `` any other training or propaganda effort that teaches or suggests either ... that the United States is an inherently racist or evil country or ... that any race or ethnicity is inherently racist or evil . ''
`` We are in the midst of a pandemic and the CDC is prioritizing a critical race theory training program @ @ @ @ @ @ @ presidential order . ''
He called on CDC Director Robert Redfield to `` immediately terminate this program — and focus on COVID-19 , where CDC has been disastrous . ''
Rufo issued `` a warning to every federal department in the United States : if you violate the president 's order on critical race theory , I will find you , expose you , and shut you down . ''
The 13-week series is called `` Naming , Measuring , and Addressing the Impacts of Racism on the Health and Well-Being of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said in a post on his website .
The first three training sessions are focused on `` racism , sexism , and other systems of structured inequality . ''
The CDC teachers must then `` address institutionalized racism '' to `` really set things right in the garden '' of a racist nation .
In sessions 6 through 9 , the CDC claims `` racism is a public health crisis '' and that `` systemic racism '' leads to `` police killings of unarmed Black and Brown men and women '' and leads @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on communities of color . ''
In sessions 10 and 11 , the trainers are to teach CDC employees that they must `` target '' and destroy the values of `` focus on the individual , '' the `` myth of meritocracy , '' the `` myth of American exceptionalism '' and `` White supremacist ideology . ''
Rufo commented that the material is `` textbook critical race theory . ''
The final session teaches CDC employees how to become activists .
They will be encouraged to join an “ Anti-Racism Collaborative with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` communications , '' making scientific publications `` anti-racist '' and influencing `` policy and legislation , '' Rufo said .
See the prospectus for the course :

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is moving ahead with a "critical race theory" training program in violation of President Trump's recent executive order.
Christopher Rufo, the director of the Discovery Institute's Center on Wealth and Poverty in Seattle, said he's obtained leaked documents that outline the CDC's plan to "examine the mechanisms of systemic racism" and address "White supremacist ideology."
"The final session teaches CDC employees how to become activists," he said in a thread on Twitter.
The employees will be encouraged to join an "Anti-Racism Collaborative with eight Collective Action Teams" focused on "communications," making scientific publications "anti-racist" and influencing "policy and legislation."
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
In general terms, critical race theory is a post-modern theoretical framework rooted in Marxist principles that views individuals through the lens of oppressed or oppressor based largely on their skin color.
Rufo said the unnamed whistleblower who provided him with the documents is outraged.
"I thought maybe they would wisely cancel this training series," the whistleblower said.
Instead, CDC employees received a message confirming the plan.
"The pressure to participate is palpable, and if you don't you will have to explain why you aren't a racist," the whistleblower said.
The White House announced Sept. 4 the Trump administration is halting critical race theory training in federal agencies, calling it "anti-American propaganda."
"This is a sickness that cannot be allowed to continue,” President Trump tweeted. “Please report any sightings so we can quickly extinguish!”
Russ Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, wrote a memo informing agencies of Trump's instruction to stop using controversial forms of training and to stop trainining on "critical race theory," "white privilege" and "any other training or propaganda effort that teaches or suggests either ... that the United States is an inherently racist or evil country or ... that any race or ethnicity is inherently racist or evil."
Rufo noted the CDC's priorities.
"We are in the midst of a pandemic and the CDC is prioritizing a critical race theory training program that is in direct violation of a presidential order."
He called on CDC Director Robert Redfield to "immediately terminate this program — and focus on COVID-19, where CDC has been disastrous."
Rufo issued "a warning to every federal department in the United States: if you violate the president's order on critical race theory, I will find you, expose you, and shut you down."
Textbook critical race theory
The 13-week series is called "Naming, Measuring, and Addressing the Impacts of Racism on the Health and Well-Being of the Nation and the World," Rufo said in a post on his website.
The first three training sessions are focused on "racism, sexism, and other systems of structured inequality."
The CDC teachers must then "address institutionalized racism" to "really set things right in the garden" of a racist nation.
In sessions 6 through 9, the CDC claims "racism is a public health crisis" and that "systemic racism" leads to "police killings of unarmed Black and Brown men and women" and leads to "the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on communities of color."
In sessions 10 and 11, the trainers are to teach CDC employees that they must "target" and destroy the values of "focus on the individual," the "myth of meritocracy," the "myth of American exceptionalism" and "White supremacist ideology."
Rufo commented that the material is "textbook critical race theory."
The final session teaches CDC employees how to become activists.
They will be encouraged to join an “Anti-Racism Collaborative with eight Collective Action Teams" focused on "communications," making scientific publications "anti-racist" and influencing "policy and legislation," Rufo said.
See the prospectus for the course:


wnd--2020-09-15--YouTube censors White House coronavirus adviser Dr. Scott Atlas

YouTube has censored a video of an interview by Stanford 's Hoover Institution with Dr. Scott W. Atlas , who is now a White House coronavirus task force adviser .
The Google-owned video platform said the content `` contradicts the World Health Organization or local health authorities ' medical information about COVID-19 . ''
Atlas , a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution , argued in the June 23 interview for an end to the lockdowns and closings .
The interview can still be viewed on the Hoover Institution website along with a transcript .
TRENDING : Cops say man @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sex slave Atlas was a professor and the chief of neuroradiology at Stanford University Medical Center .
Jonathan S. Tobin , writing for the Federalist , said it 's indefensible to censor `` a video from a widely respected think tank in which Atlas discussed a data-driven analysis of the catastrophic impact of the lockdowns . ''
`` Atlas did n't deny the seriousness of the disease or the need to act to prevent its spread — he merely questioned the efficacy of broad lockdowns , '' Tobin wrote .
`` Atlas pointed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ distress as well as other unintended consequences that compromised public health such as the decrease in doctor visits or treatments for other potentially fatal conditions as well as the effects of school closings on childhood development as well as upticks of abuse . ''
Tobin said the `` idea that any discussion of these issues can be shut down with a single click makes the question of regulating the untrammeled censoring power of a global tech monopoly like Google all the more important . ''

YouTube has censored a video of an interview by Stanford's Hoover Institution with Dr. Scott W. Atlas, who is now a White House coronavirus task force adviser.
The Google-owned video platform said the content "contradicts the World Health Organization or local health authorities' medical information about COVID-19."
Atlas, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, argued in the June 23 interview for an end to the lockdowns and closings.
The interview can still be viewed on the Hoover Institution website along with a transcript.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
Atlas was a professor and the chief of neuroradiology at Stanford University Medical Center.
Jonathan S. Tobin, writing for the Federalist, said it's indefensible to censor "a video from a widely respected think tank in which Atlas discussed a data-driven analysis of the catastrophic impact of the lockdowns."
"Atlas didn't deny the seriousness of the disease or the need to act to prevent its spread — he merely questioned the efficacy of broad lockdowns," Tobin wrote. "Atlas pointed out the resulting creation of acute economic distress as well as other unintended consequences that compromised public health such as the decrease in doctor visits or treatments for other potentially fatal conditions as well as the effects of school closings on childhood development as well as upticks of abuse."
Tobin said the "idea that any discussion of these issues can be shut down with a single click makes the question of regulating the untrammeled censoring power of a global tech monopoly like Google all the more important."


wnd--2020-09-14--The communists' targeting of blacks

The communists' targeting of blacks

There 's not much in the way of praise I 'm prepared to acknowledge when it comes to the late FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover .
That said , I am today more convinced than at any time before that Hoover was correct to be concerned about the communist influence upon blacks when he learned Vladimir Lenin had said blacks `` were a revolutionary class people '' – albeit , I am convinced for reasons separate from those of Hoover .
Lenin was saying that blacks were ripe for exploitation by being converted into a revolutionary class – through intellectual @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – an effort that was and is intended to lead dark-skinned Americans specifically ( and brown-skinned peoples in general ) further from the truth of opportunity that exists in America .
Communists prey upon dysfunction and anger , and where none exists , it 's created and/or fomented .
Leninism is built upon egalitarianism , class conflict and dialectical materialism , embroidered in a cheap synthetic fabric of social progress .
And no group has been led further astray and suffered more because of Marxism , i.e.
, communism , than blacks .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ first-generation free blacks , because cunning predators such as Lenin and W.E.B .
Du Bois deceived those easily blinded by resentment , ignorance and fear .
Communism took root amongst the black illuminati in the early 1900s , and there has been no more influential black revolutionary-minded orator of communist dogma than W.E.B .
Du Bois .
He may not have officially joined the Communist Party until he was 93 years of age , but he was a hardcore dedicated communist his entire life .
It was Du Bois who attended the National @ @ @ @ @ @ @ led to the creation of the National Negro Committee .
The NAACP was born out of the second meeting of this Committee .
Du Bois , true to his communist views , insisted upon the use of the label `` colored '' rather than `` black , '' because `` colored '' could be used to include dark-skinned persons everywhere – which was of significant importance if socialism was to reach the greatest number of those intended .
Understanding it was the communist Du Bois , a black man , who was responsible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ '' and that Negro and Negress mean black in many different languages – Twitter , Facebook , the fake news media and other sundry fools and illiterates look stupid as they rush to censor me whenever I use those assignations .
They 're either stupid , liars , historically illiterate or purposefully dishonest as a means to maintain rancor , antipathy and anger .
TRENDING : Cops say man paid $ 500 to BUY girl as sex slave While black and white so-called civil rights supporters worked together to found the movement , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who were the executive officers ( i.e.
, white socialists pulling the strings ) .
The genius of the Communist Party was to adapt itself specific to every environment and region where there were concentrations of blacks by morphing into the Socialist Party of America .
In the South they used civil rights , and I 'm prepared to argue that they used Dr. King also .
I 'm not subscribing to the damnable lie that Dr. King was a Communist – he was not .
Black Communists like Bayard Rustin used stealth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ corrupt Dr. King 's movement after his assassination .
In the early 1940s , Rustin , an avowed black Communist , channeled Lenin saying , `` Blacks are ripe for Communists . ''
Rustin was instrumental in the formation of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference ( SCLC ) , and out of that group has emerged the likes of the late Joseph Lowery and others who invent complaints designed to stir the caldron of anger , victimology and rabid hatred for anyone who dares attempt to share a message of truth , life @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the signing of the Civil Rights Act , Rustin turned the attention of the black illuminati ( i.e.
, the Talented Tenth ) from `` protest '' to the era of `` politics . ''
Rustin became the honorary chairman of the Socialist Party of America in 1972 and the national chairman when the group changed its name to Social Democrats , USA ( SDUSA ) a short time later .
Their targets were specifically black women and ministers .
We see the success of this plan from the 1960s to the present @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Angela Davis to Ayanna Pressley , D-Mass.
, to Staci Abrams , D-Ga. , to the collection of black communist women on Fox News and other fake news networks .
It 's a carefully orchestrated plan to plant belligerent communist women in areas across the nation where they have the best chance of being elected .
It 's neither coincidence nor accident that we see these people in Florida , Georgia , Massachusetts , Chicago , etc .
It 's also part of the carefully crafted plan for these women to take positions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ There , those such as Angela Davis indoctrinate and convert those black women who are weak-minded , malleable and filled with hatred .
Constraints of space prevent me from sharing the full extent communism is rooted into the lives and minds of blacks , but suffice it to say that it 's stunning even to me .
In my research , I 've found that the leadership of many black churches has either intentionally or unwittingly been converted to the socialist , i.e.
, communist mindset , as has the leadership of a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ civic groups .
This is n't ipse dixit .
It 's glaringly obvious to anyone willing to listen to the complaints and demands of said organizations and groups .
There 's a palpable resentment and rage infused into every predominantly black city .
Anger is a constant companion – it permeates the air like cheap perfume .
This anger is important when it comes to the socialist corruption of a people .
It 's the cup from which black intellectuals , both past and present , drank/drink and use to promote socialism among @ @ @ @ @ @ @ social progress .
And socialism is foundational to communism .
Michelle Obama 's college complaints and thesis are representative of this .
Listen to the verbiage that is employed by her , Obama and other of the so-called black illuminati – or , as W.E.B .
Du Bois referenced them , the `` Talented Tenth . ''
Their verbiage is communism disguised as social justice , and intended to stir the caldron of perceived social immiseration until it either boils over into the streets and/or they are successful in bringing down our form @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Massie 's new book , `` I Feel the Presence of the Lord , '' a collection of devotions intended to encourage the reader to seek and see the Lord in every aspect of life .

There's not much in the way of praise I'm prepared to acknowledge when it comes to the late FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover. That said, I am today more convinced than at any time before that Hoover was correct to be concerned about the communist influence upon blacks when he learned Vladimir Lenin had said blacks "were a revolutionary class people" – albeit, I am convinced for reasons separate from those of Hoover.
Lenin was saying that blacks were ripe for exploitation by being converted into a revolutionary class – through intellectual corruption and a generational inculcation of victimology – an effort that was and is intended to lead dark-skinned Americans specifically (and brown-skinned peoples in general) further from the truth of opportunity that exists in America.
Communists prey upon dysfunction and anger, and where none exists, it's created and/or fomented. Leninism is built upon egalitarianism, class conflict and dialectical materialism, embroidered in a cheap synthetic fabric of social progress. And no group has been led further astray and suffered more because of Marxism, i.e., communism, than blacks. Communism was the perfect elixir to exploit first-generation free blacks, because cunning predators such as Lenin and W.E.B. Du Bois deceived those easily blinded by resentment, ignorance and fear.
Communism took root amongst the black illuminati in the early 1900s, and there has been no more influential black revolutionary-minded orator of communist dogma than W.E.B. Du Bois. He may not have officially joined the Communist Party until he was 93 years of age, but he was a hardcore dedicated communist his entire life. It was Du Bois who attended the National Negro Conference in New York, which led to the creation of the National Negro Committee. The NAACP was born out of the second meeting of this Committee. Du Bois, true to his communist views, insisted upon the use of the label "colored" rather than "black," because "colored" could be used to include dark-skinned persons everywhere – which was of significant importance if socialism was to reach the greatest number of those intended.
Understanding it was the communist Du Bois, a black man, who was responsible for the assignation "colored people," and that Negro and Negress mean black in many different languages – Twitter, Facebook, the fake news media and other sundry fools and illiterates look stupid as they rush to censor me whenever I use those assignations. They're either stupid, liars, historically illiterate or purposefully dishonest as a means to maintain rancor, antipathy and anger.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
While black and white so-called civil rights supporters worked together to found the movement, it was the liberal, white Marxist-inspired who were the executive officers (i.e., white socialists pulling the strings). The genius of the Communist Party was to adapt itself specific to every environment and region where there were concentrations of blacks by morphing into the Socialist Party of America. In the South they used civil rights, and I'm prepared to argue that they used Dr. King also. I'm not subscribing to the damnable lie that Dr. King was a Communist – he was not. Black Communists like Bayard Rustin used stealth to lay the groundwork that would ultimately corrupt Dr. King's movement after his assassination.
In the early 1940s, Rustin, an avowed black Communist, channeled Lenin saying, "Blacks are ripe for Communists." Rustin was instrumental in the formation of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), and out of that group has emerged the likes of the late Joseph Lowery and others who invent complaints designed to stir the caldron of anger, victimology and rabid hatred for anyone who dares attempt to share a message of truth, life and modernity.
In 1965, after the signing of the Civil Rights Act, Rustin turned the attention of the black illuminati (i.e., the Talented Tenth) from "protest" to the era of "politics." Rustin became the honorary chairman of the Socialist Party of America in 1972 and the national chairman when the group changed its name to Social Democrats, USA (SDUSA) a short time later.
Their targets were specifically black women and ministers. We see the success of this plan from the 1960s to the present in the form of rabidly militant Communist Angela Davis to Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., to Staci Abrams, D-Ga., to the collection of black communist women on Fox News and other fake news networks.
It's a carefully orchestrated plan to plant belligerent communist women in areas across the nation where they have the best chance of being elected. It's neither coincidence nor accident that we see these people in Florida, Georgia, Massachusetts, Chicago, etc.
It's also part of the carefully crafted plan for these women to take positions on college and university campuses nationwide. There, those such as Angela Davis indoctrinate and convert those black women who are weak-minded, malleable and filled with hatred.
Constraints of space prevent me from sharing the full extent communism is rooted into the lives and minds of blacks, but suffice it to say that it's stunning even to me. In my research, I've found that the leadership of many black churches has either intentionally or unwittingly been converted to the socialist, i.e., communist mindset, as has the leadership of a majority of black organizations, schools and civic groups. This isn't ipse dixit. It's glaringly obvious to anyone willing to listen to the complaints and demands of said organizations and groups.
There's a palpable resentment and rage infused into every predominantly black city. Anger is a constant companion – it permeates the air like cheap perfume. This anger is important when it comes to the socialist corruption of a people. It's the cup from which black intellectuals, both past and present, drank/drink and use to promote socialism among the people, under the banner of social progress. And socialism is foundational to communism.
Michelle Obama's college complaints and thesis are representative of this. Listen to the verbiage that is employed by her, Obama and other of the so-called black illuminati – or, as W.E.B. Du Bois referenced them, the "Talented Tenth." Their verbiage is communism disguised as social justice, and intended to stir the caldron of perceived social immiseration until it either boils over into the streets and/or they are successful in bringing down our form of government from within.
Order Mychal Massie's new book, "I Feel the Presence of the Lord," a collection of devotions intended to encourage the reader to seek and see the Lord in every aspect of life.


wnd--2020-09-14--Video of Biden touching girls removed by Twitter as 'child sexual exploitation'

C-SPAN footage showing Joe Biden touching young girls was flagged and removed by Twitter for violating its `` Child Sexual @ @ @ @ @ News reported the issue arose after Texan progressive activist Johnny Graz asserted Biden should be @ @ @ @ @ Twitter user Jake Koenig , seeking to support Graz 's argument , posted C-SPAN footage @ @ @ @ @ girls at their parents ' congressional swear-in ceremonies in 2015 .
Critics have pointed out @ @ @ @ @ in sensitive areas and sometimes whispered into their ears .
TRENDING : Cops say man @ @ @ @ @ girl as sex slave When Koenig posted the footage on Twitter , Summit News reported @ @ @ @ @ until he agreed to delete it .
`` I tried to respond with a video @ @ @ @ @ interacts with women and little girls but Twitter flagged me for trying to post images @ @ @ @ @ Guess twitter agrees with @ jvgraz , '' he tweeted .
Twitter flagged it as @ @ @ @ @ violates [ its ] Child Sexual Exploitation Policy . ''

C-SPAN footage showing Joe Biden touching young girls was flagged and removed by Twitter for violating its "Child Sexual Exploitation Policy."
Summit News reported the issue arose after Texan progressive activist Johnny Graz asserted Biden should be investigated for sexual assault.
Twitter user Jake Koenig, seeking to support Graz's argument, posted C-SPAN footage of Biden interacting with young girls at their parents' congressional swear-in ceremonies in 2015.
Critics have pointed out Biden touched the young girls in sensitive areas and sometimes whispered into their ears.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
When Koenig posted the footage on Twitter, Summit News reported, his account was locked until he agreed to delete it.
"I tried to respond with a video of evidence on how Biden interacts with women and little girls but Twitter flagged me for trying to post images of child molestation hahahahahahhaha. Guess twitter agrees with @jvgraz," he tweeted.
Twitter flagged it as "prohibited content that "violates [its] Child Sexual Exploitation Policy."
I tried to respond with a video of evidence on how Biden interacts with women and little girls but Twitter flagged me for trying to post images of child molestation hahahahahahhaha. Guess twitter agrees with @jvgraz pic.twitter.com/tOIUMrcyAs — Joe Bidens Televised Shart (@koenigjake) September 12, 2020


wnd--2020-09-14--Surviving COVID: Why poorer nations have lower death rates

Note : Dr. Vliet is a member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons , AAPS .
The COVID death rate in the United States is one of the highest in the world , even with our advanced medical care delivery and resources .
Many less affluent countries have death rates 20 times lower than the U.S. , even with fewer hospitals , doctors , nurses and high-tech equipment .
What is the common factor that accounts for the marked difference in death rates ?
It is quite simply this : Other countries use early outpatient treatment with widely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ first signs of symptoms , usually without waiting extra days for test results to confirm the physician 's clinical diagnosis .
The late-stage treatment model promoted by Dr. Fauci and FDA 's Dr. Hahn has been for U.S. patients to be sent home to self-quarantine until symptoms worsened , and then go into the hospital when seriously ill with respiratory distress and heart damage .
Only then do patients get offered medication , oxygen support , steroids , anti-coagulants and others that typically do n't work as well at this critical illness stage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ $ 500 to BUY girl as sex slave But home therapy could prevent thousands of hospitalizations and deaths , according to a just-published article from the respected American Journal of Medicine .
The U.S. urgently needs to implement this early successful model .
Lead author Peter McCullough , M.D.
, a cardiologist at Baylor , one of the most widely published physicians in America , is not just theorizing .
He is actually treating COVID patients at home .
Dr. McCullough 's recommendation would clearly save lives using cheap , safe , FDA-approved @ @ @ @ @ @ @ azithromycin or doxycycline , possibly ivermectin or colchicine , inhaled budesomide or oral steroids , home oxygen concentrators , plus supplemental zinc , vitamin C and vitamin D. The supply of HCQ has been ramped up to handle its use in early treatment of COVID , but we have millions of doses in the Strategic National Stockpile deteriorating in government warehouses – vital medicine that is not being distributed because , for political reasons , doctors are still not prescribing it for COVID-19 outpatients .
Why do n't Americans have the freedom to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The FDA 's false narrative about HCQ causing harm to outpatients has led to more deaths with unprecedented restrictions on physicians ' off-label prescribing rights imposed by state governors , medical boards and pharmacy boards .
Thirty-seven states still restrict HCQ .
There are other major forces pushing against home-based treatment that have resulted in our high death rate .
These coordinated efforts are amplified by the mainstream media megaphone perpetuating the constant drumbeat of fear to keep the public afraid of returning to normal activities .
• The hospital lobby is preventing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The issues raised in Avik Roy 's classic 2013 column have been made worse during the COVID-19 pandemic because hospitals receive significantly higher payments for COVID patients , especially those who go on a ventilator .
• Big Pharma pushes for new high-cost medicines still on patent – for example , Gilead 's major push to discredit HCQ and favor remdesivir , its costly experimental drug .
• Enormous financial conflicts exist within the NIH , CDC and FDA – all of whom get payments from pharmaceutical companies and vaccine manufacturers , as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine adjuvants and processes .
Dr. McCullough 's editorial , `` The Great Gamble of Covid-19 Vaccine Development , '' explained this multibillion-dollar financial incentive to preserve vaccine windfall profits in wealthy countries .
• Big Medicine , as shown clearly by the AMA 's actions to falsely malign HCQ , no longer advocates for physicians and patients , but works to protect its revenue from government contracts .
• Academic medical centers all have research programs dependent on NIH grants .
Many academic physicians have been `` muzzled '' by their institutions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of funding .
In contrast , the forces pushing for early , home-based treatment are few in number , smaller and do not have financial clout or a media megaphone .
• One medical organization , the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons ( AAPS ) , has stood against the juggernaut preventing access to HCQ with many efforts , including a lawsuit against FDA .
• Front-line doctors , primarily independent physicians not employed by hospitals or contracted with insurance companies that dictate treatment protocols doctors are allowed to use .
• @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Party Patriots , Open Texas , America 's Black Robe Regiment and a few others .
• A few national political leaders willing to advocate publicly for early and widespread access to HCQ : President Trump , trade adviser Peter Navarro , Sen. Ron Johnson , Reps. Andy Biggs , R-Ariz. , and Louie Gohmert , R-Texas .
So what do patients need to do NOW to advocate for early home treatment if they get sick ?
Here are 10 ACTION STEPS to take : • PRINT Dr. McCullough 's article and read @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
• COPY Dr. McCullough 's article and give to your doctors and family members .
• ASK your doctor now : `` If I get sick with COVID , will you treat me at home with medicines already available for off-label use ? ''
• CHECK with your pharmacist : `` Will you dispense HCQ if I get sick with COVID and my doctor prescribes it ? ''
• If your doctor and pharmacist will not prescribe or dispense HCQ , start now to explore other options – next four steps .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ what is available for early intervention and treatment at home .
• IDENTIFY the telemedicine services that fit your needs and budget , and keep a list handy in case you get sick .
• SEARCH for direct pay primary care medical practices who are more likely to tailor treatment to your individual needs .
You need a trusted physician who shares your views .
• LOCATE independent pharmacies who will dispense the medicines you need and ship to you – they may be in another state .
• ACT to stay healthy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ NOT wearing a mask , prayer and meditation ( immune boosters ! )
, eat healthy diet avoiding excess sugars and processed foods , take vitamins such as zinc , vitamin C , vitamin D , and immune boosting anti-viral supplements such as quercetin , elderberry , NAC and others .
The bottom line : `` If you get COVID-19 , you do n't want to be admitted to hospital .
The death rate for patients sick enough to be admitted is quite high .
And you will probably be a prisoner with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or the doctor of your choice .
Patients need a trusted physician who shares their views , '' said Dr. Jane Orient , executive director of AAPS .

Note: Dr. Vliet is a member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, AAPS.
The COVID death rate in the United States is one of the highest in the world, even with our advanced medical care delivery and resources. Many less affluent countries have death rates 20 times lower than the U.S., even with fewer hospitals, doctors, nurses and high-tech equipment.
What is the common factor that accounts for the marked difference in death rates?
It is quite simply this: Other countries use early outpatient treatment with widely available antiviral medicines, begun at the first signs of symptoms, usually without waiting extra days for test results to confirm the physician's clinical diagnosis.
The late-stage treatment model promoted by Dr. Fauci and FDA's Dr. Hahn has been for U.S. patients to be sent home to self-quarantine until symptoms worsened, and then go into the hospital when seriously ill with respiratory distress and heart damage. Only then do patients get offered medication, oxygen support, steroids, anti-coagulants and others that typically don't work as well at this critical illness stage.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
But home therapy could prevent thousands of hospitalizations and deaths, according to a just-published article from the respected American Journal of Medicine. The U.S. urgently needs to implement this early successful model. Lead author Peter McCullough, M.D., a cardiologist at Baylor, one of the most widely published physicians in America, is not just theorizing. He is actually treating COVID patients at home.
Dr. McCullough's recommendation would clearly save lives using cheap, safe, FDA-approved medicines – hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) with azithromycin or doxycycline, possibly ivermectin or colchicine, inhaled budesomide or oral steroids, home oxygen concentrators, plus supplemental zinc, vitamin C and vitamin D.
The supply of HCQ has been ramped up to handle its use in early treatment of COVID, but we have millions of doses in the Strategic National Stockpile deteriorating in government warehouses – vital medicine that is not being distributed because, for political reasons, doctors are still not prescribing it for COVID-19 outpatients.
Why don't Americans have the freedom to use HCQ as in other countries? The FDA's false narrative about HCQ causing harm to outpatients has led to more deaths with unprecedented restrictions on physicians' off-label prescribing rights imposed by state governors, medical boards and pharmacy boards. Thirty-seven states still restrict HCQ.
There are other major forces pushing against home-based treatment that have resulted in our high death rate. These coordinated efforts are amplified by the mainstream media megaphone perpetuating the constant drumbeat of fear to keep the public afraid of returning to normal activities.
The hospital lobby is preventing outpatient treatment to maintain hospital income. The issues raised in Avik Roy's classic 2013 column have been made worse during the COVID-19 pandemic because hospitals receive significantly higher payments for COVID patients, especially those who go on a ventilator.
Big Pharma pushes for new high-cost medicines still on patent – for example, Gilead's major push to discredit HCQ and favor remdesivir, its costly experimental drug.
Enormous financial conflicts exist within the NIH, CDC and FDA – all of whom get payments from pharmaceutical companies and vaccine manufacturers, as well as income from patents on new vaccine adjuvants and processes. Dr. McCullough's editorial, "The Great Gamble of Covid-19 Vaccine Development," explained this multibillion-dollar financial incentive to preserve vaccine windfall profits in wealthy countries.
Big Medicine, as shown clearly by the AMA's actions to falsely malign HCQ, no longer advocates for physicians and patients, but works to protect its revenue from government contracts.
Academic medical centers all have research programs dependent on NIH grants. Many academic physicians have been "muzzled" by their institutions from speaking out because of threatened loss of funding.
In contrast, the forces pushing for early, home-based treatment are few in number, smaller and do not have financial clout or a media megaphone.
One medical organization, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), has stood against the juggernaut preventing access to HCQ with many efforts, including a lawsuit against FDA.
Front-line doctors, primarily independent physicians not employed by hospitals or contracted with insurance companies that dictate treatment protocols doctors are allowed to use.
Grassroots citizens groups such as the Tea Party Patriots, Open Texas, America's Black Robe Regiment and a few others.
A few national political leaders willing to advocate publicly for early and widespread access to HCQ: President Trump, trade adviser Peter Navarro, Sen. Ron Johnson, Reps. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., and Louie Gohmert, R-Texas.
So what do patients need to do NOW to advocate for early home treatment if they get sick? Here are 10 ACTION STEPS to take:
PRINT Dr. McCullough's article and read about your options before you get sick. COPY Dr. McCullough's article and give to your doctors and family members. ASK your doctor now: "If I get sick with COVID, will you treat me at home with medicines already available for off-label use?" CHECK with your pharmacist: "Will you dispense HCQ if I get sick with COVID and my doctor prescribes it?" If your doctor and pharmacist will not prescribe or dispense HCQ, start now to explore other options – next four steps. READ about telemedicine options to see what is available for early intervention and treatment at home. IDENTIFY the telemedicine services that fit your needs and budget, and keep a list handy in case you get sick. SEARCH for direct pay primary care medical practices who are more likely to tailor treatment to your individual needs. You need a trusted physician who shares your views. LOCATE independent pharmacies who will dispense the medicines you need and ship to you – they may be in another state. ACT to stay healthy! Adequate sleep, exercise preferably outdoors NOT wearing a mask, prayer and meditation (immune boosters!), eat healthy diet avoiding excess sugars and processed foods, take vitamins such as zinc, vitamin C, vitamin D, and immune boosting anti-viral supplements such as quercetin, elderberry, NAC and others.
The bottom line: "If you get COVID-19, you don't want to be admitted to hospital. The death rate for patients sick enough to be admitted is quite high. And you will probably be a prisoner with no visits from family, clergy, or the doctor of your choice. Patients need a trusted physician who shares their views," said Dr. Jane Orient, executive director of AAPS.


wnd--2020-09-14--Biden would make Obama look tame in comparison

Even Democrats admit that voting for Joe Biden is a vote against President Trump , not a vote for Biden 's policies .
Biden has gone back and forth on issues – recently in fact , not just looking back at his more than 40 years in office – and has n't come out strongly for much of anything .
Ask most Democrats which policy position of Biden 's they like , and they wo n't be able to name one .
If they 're an experienced Democrat , they 'll merely fall back on one of the traditional differences @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or the Second Amendment .
But voting for Biden is n't going to improve things .
He may be waffling now , since he 's trying to run to the middle in order to win over the moderates and swing voters , but he 's shown that he can be pulled to the far left .
Earlier in the campaign , he said he would end fracking .
Now that he realizes it could cause him to lose Pennsylvania and the Rust Belt , he now supports fracking .
Likely Democrats Biden would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crew who ran against him for president .
The senators in the group all cosponsored a bill that would spend an estimated $ 50 trillion to $ 90 trillion on climate change .
This would destroy the energy industry and cause more rolling blackouts in California .
It 's impossible to tell whether Biden would pursue a carbon tax .
Biden has said he will cut taxes for the middle class , and those making $ 400,000 a year wo n't see any tax increase .
But this is a false promise ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a Republican in favor of tax cuts , was unable to keep his promise of not raising taxes .
With all the spending the Democrats are proposing , combined with all the spending on COVID-19 relief , there is no way Biden will be able to stick to this .
Richard Reeves of the Brookings Institute , a left-leaning think tank fairly representative of Democrats , explained in 2017 why taxes must be raised on the middle class .
He says in order to afford all of the spending , we need to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state income taxes and local property taxes .
This will significantly raise taxes on the middle class .
Muzaffar Chishti , a senior fellow and director of the MPI office at the New York University School of Law , said Biden 's positions on immigration have evolved `` quite a bit '' – even from the beginning of his own campaign .
The Obama administration deported more illegal immigrants than the Trump administration , resulting in the nickname `` deporter-in-chief '' for Obama .
Biden 's website says he would resume similar policies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ n't called for abolishing ICE .
But Biden has admitted that the Obama approach to illegal immigration was wrong , and vows to change that .
So which is it ?
Does he want to continue Obama 's policies there or not ?
He will be under tremendous pressure to distinguish his administration , and with race issues dominating the country currently he will be pushed to the left .
TRENDING : Cops say man paid $ 500 to BUY girl as sex slave For months , since the rioting broke out in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Biden stayed quiet about it .
Now that the polls are showing the vast majority of the public does n't approve of the rioting , he has finally started criticizing the violence – though he even flubbed that , first blaming it on far right wingers instead of Antifa and Black Lives Matter .
But that will change .
His vice presidential running mate , Kamala Harris , who has been ranked the most liberal member of the Senate , promoted and fundraised for a group bailing out the rioters .
Since @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it is very likely Biden would continue his policies in dealing with issues of race .
Obama did nothing to stop rioting ; in fact he made it worse by encouraging the rioters .
After George Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin , Obama reacted by saying , `` If I had a son , he would look like Trayvon . ''
If you think the rioting is bad now , wait until Biden assumes the presidency .
He will let it go on and on .
And the rioters have shown they wo n't @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The rioting is occurring in the big blue cities run by Democrats , targeting the homes of Democratic politicians .
It 's worse than it was under Obama , so if allowed to continue under a Biden administration , we 're going to see even more killings and destruction .
Biden will make Obama look tame .
If people think they are getting another Obama , they are mistaken .
All the signs – if you look beneath Biden 's dishonest waffling – point to a much more radical presidency .
Biden already @ @ @ @ @ @ @ platform after Sanders dropped out of the race .
If Biden wins the presidency , expect to see him adopt much of the rest , including the unaffordable Medicare for All , tuition-free public college and the Green New Deal .
Biden has kept fairly quiet on some issues , such as religious freedom , abortion and guns , in order to have it both ways , but these issues are usually where Democrats predictably lurch to the left when in power .
We saw what happened under Obama as the left made @ @ @ @ @ @ @ difficult for many of us .
That was just the tip of the iceberg .
The Democratic Party has become so radicalized in recent years , as evidenced by Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez becoming its leaders , that it is terrifying to think what they are going to do next with Biden in power .
I was always skeptical of warnings about how bad the country could become if a Democrat is elected , thinking a lot of it was fear-mongering , but when I saw the drastic changes under the Obama @ @ @ @ @ @ @ predictions will come true under a Biden administration .
There are certain things you are no longer allowed to say or do , and that list is going to become longer under Biden .
You think the cancel culture is bad now , it 's going to spread even further to moderate Democrats , apolitical people , conservative minorities , conservative LGBT and the self-employed ( by targeting their customers ) ; threatening them too if they do n't promote far-left views .
Trump is the main person preventing this from expanding .

Even Democrats admit that voting for Joe Biden is a vote against President Trump, not a vote for Biden's policies. Biden has gone back and forth on issues – recently in fact, not just looking back at his more than 40 years in office – and hasn't come out strongly for much of anything. Ask most Democrats which policy position of Biden's they like, and they won't be able to name one. If they're an experienced Democrat, they'll merely fall back on one of the traditional differences between Democrats and Republicans, like abortion or the Second Amendment.
But voting for Biden isn't going to improve things. He may be waffling now, since he's trying to run to the middle in order to win over the moderates and swing voters, but he's shown that he can be pulled to the far left.
Earlier in the campaign, he said he would end fracking. Now that he realizes it could cause him to lose Pennsylvania and the Rust Belt, he now supports fracking. Likely Democrats Biden would pick for his Cabinet include the far-left crew who ran against him for president. The senators in the group all cosponsored a bill that would spend an estimated $50 trillion to $90 trillion on climate change. This would destroy the energy industry and cause more rolling blackouts in California. It's impossible to tell whether Biden would pursue a carbon tax.
Biden has said he will cut taxes for the middle class, and those making $400,000 a year won't see any tax increase. But this is a false promise; even President George H.W. Bush, a Republican in favor of tax cuts, was unable to keep his promise of not raising taxes. With all the spending the Democrats are proposing, combined with all the spending on COVID-19 relief, there is no way Biden will be able to stick to this. Richard Reeves of the Brookings Institute, a left-leaning think tank fairly representative of Democrats, explained in 2017 why taxes must be raised on the middle class. He says in order to afford all of the spending, we need to remove tax deductions on mortgage interest, state income taxes and local property taxes. This will significantly raise taxes on the middle class.
Muzaffar Chishti, a senior fellow and director of the MPI office at the New York University School of Law, said Biden's positions on immigration have evolved "quite a bit" – even from the beginning of his own campaign. The Obama administration deported more illegal immigrants than the Trump administration, resulting in the nickname "deporter-in-chief" for Obama. Biden's website says he would resume similar policies to the Obama administration. He hasn't called for abolishing ICE. But Biden has admitted that the Obama approach to illegal immigration was wrong, and vows to change that. So which is it? Does he want to continue Obama's policies there or not? He will be under tremendous pressure to distinguish his administration, and with race issues dominating the country currently he will be pushed to the left.
TRENDING: Is this the 'Final Battle'?
For months, since the rioting broke out in May after the death of George Floyd, Biden stayed quiet about it. Now that the polls are showing the vast majority of the public doesn't approve of the rioting, he has finally started criticizing the violence – though he even flubbed that, first blaming it on far right wingers instead of Antifa and Black Lives Matter.
But that will change. His vice presidential running mate, Kamala Harris, who has been ranked the most liberal member of the Senate, promoted and fundraised for a group bailing out the rioters. Since Obama was a black Democratic president, it is very likely Biden would continue his policies in dealing with issues of race. Obama did nothing to stop rioting; in fact he made it worse by encouraging the rioters. After George Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin, Obama reacted by saying, "If I had a son, he would look like Trayvon."
If you think the rioting is bad now, wait until Biden assumes the presidency. He will let it go on and on. And the rioters have shown they won't relent if Democrats are in power. The rioting is occurring in the big blue cities run by Democrats, targeting the homes of Democratic politicians. It's worse than it was under Obama, so if allowed to continue under a Biden administration, we're going to see even more killings and destruction.
Biden will make Obama look tame. If people think they are getting another Obama, they are mistaken. All the signs – if you look beneath Biden's dishonest waffling – point to a much more radical presidency. Biden already adopted significant portions of Bernie Sanders' platform after Sanders dropped out of the race. If Biden wins the presidency, expect to see him adopt much of the rest, including the unaffordable Medicare for All, tuition-free public college and the Green New Deal.
If Joe Biden is elected, will he be beholden to the left wing of his party? Yes No Completing this poll entitles you to WND news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use You're logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out. 94% (16 Votes) 6% (1 Votes)
Biden has kept fairly quiet on some issues, such as religious freedom, abortion and guns, in order to have it both ways, but these issues are usually where Democrats predictably lurch to the left when in power. We saw what happened under Obama as the left made inroads in these areas, making life difficult for many of us. That was just the tip of the iceberg. The Democratic Party has become so radicalized in recent years, as evidenced by Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez becoming its leaders, that it is terrifying to think what they are going to do next with Biden in power.
I was always skeptical of warnings about how bad the country could become if a Democrat is elected, thinking a lot of it was fear-mongering, but when I saw the drastic changes under the Obama administration, I realized some of the predictions will come true under a Biden administration. There are certain things you are no longer allowed to say or do, and that list is going to become longer under Biden. You think the cancel culture is bad now, it's going to spread even further to moderate Democrats, apolitical people, conservative minorities, conservative LGBT and the self-employed (by targeting their customers); threatening them too if they don't promote far-left views. Trump is the main person preventing this from expanding.


wnd--2020-09-15--'Historic flooding' feared from Hurricane Sally

( FOX NEWS ) -- A slow-moving Hurricane Sally is edging closer to the northern Gulf Coast Tuesday as forecasters @ @ @ @ @ flooding to the region .
The U.S. National Hurricane Center ( NHC ) in Miami @ @ @ @ @ , Hurricane Sally is a Category 1 storm , packing maximum sustained winds of 85 @ @ @ @ @ about 105 miles south-southeast of Biloxi , Miss.
, moving west-northwest at 2 mph .
@ @ @ @ @ from Sally with extreme life-threatening flash flooding likely through Wednesday along portions of the northern @ @ @ @ @ NHC said .

(FOX NEWS) -- A slow-moving Hurricane Sally is edging closer to the northern Gulf Coast Tuesday as forecasters are warning of potentially historic flooding to the region.
The U.S. National Hurricane Center (NHC) in Miami said as of early Tuesday, Hurricane Sally is a Category 1 storm, packing maximum sustained winds of 85 mph, and is located about 105 miles south-southeast of Biloxi, Miss., moving west-northwest at 2 mph.
"Historic flooding is possible from Sally with extreme life-threatening flash flooding likely through Wednesday along portions of the northern Gulf Coast," the NHC said.
Read the full story ›


wnd--2020-09-15--Trump warns of response if plot to assassinate ambassador is pursued

( FOX NEWS ) -- President Trump took to Twitter late Monday to issue a stern warning to Iran that @ @ @ @ @ against the U.S. in retaliation for the airstrike that killed Gen. Qassem Soleimani earlier this @ @ @ @ @ a counterattack that “ will be 1,000 times greater in magnitude.
” Speaking hours later @ @ @ @ @ Fox & Friends '' on Tuesday morning , Trump repeated the warning : `` We @ @ @ @ @ he said .
`` They 'll be hit a thousand times harder . ''
Trump @ @ @ @ @ Tehran is considering an assassination attempt on Lana Marks , the United States ’ ambassador @ @ @ @ @ officials have been aware of threats against the ambassador since the spring , but intelligence @ @ @ @ @ more specific in recent weeks .

(FOX NEWS) -- President Trump took to Twitter late Monday to issue a stern warning to Iran that an assassination attempt or attack against the U.S. in retaliation for the airstrike that killed Gen. Qassem Soleimani earlier this year would be met with a counterattack that “will be 1,000 times greater in magnitude.”
Speaking hours later in an interview with "Fox & Friends" on Tuesday morning, Trump repeated the warning: "We're all set," he said. "They'll be hit a thousand times harder."
Trump cited recent reports that claim Tehran is considering an assassination attempt on Lana Marks, the United States’ ambassador to South Africa. U.S. officials have been aware of threats against the ambassador since the spring, but intelligence suggests those threats have become more specific in recent weeks.
Read the full story ›