politicalite--2020-12-19--STORM BREWING: Could Trump Invoke An Executive Order To Quash Election Result?

This is a brief follow up to a previous article in which I reported upon the use of the Dominion Counting System in the 2020 Presidential Election and President Trump ’ s 2018 Executive Order : - “ Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election – Issued : September 12 , 2018 ” Section 1 .
( a ) Not later than 45 days after the conclusion of a United States election , the Director of National Intelligence , in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate executive departments and agencies , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ indicating that a foreign government , or any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government , has acted with the intent or purpose of interfering in that election .
The 45 day deadline for the Intelligence Reports to be placed before the President expires on Friday 18th December 2020 .
Much has happened following my previous article , so many twists and turns , thousands of sworn affidavits have been provided by witnesses citing evidence of alleged electoral manipulation and voter fraud .
Allied Security Operations Group @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Voting Systems in a small Michigan County they released their report on Monday stating : - “ We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results “ .
“ The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors.
” Consequently , they advised that President Trump should invoke his 2018 Executive Order to ensure national security in the event of foreign interference in an election .
The report was published on the website of attorney Matthew DePerno @ @ @ @ @ @ @ represented a voter in the case .
The County was in the news after the election when it was discovered that 6,000 votes had been flipped from President Trump to Joe Biden .
The Michigan Secretary of State and the Antrim County Clerk both blamed “ human error.
” But Allied Security insists it ’ s a “ machine ” or “ software ” error , calling it a “ national security issue.
” Dominion machines are used in 28 states , serving some 40 % of the population .
The report states @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for 6 December found 68.05 % – 10,667 of 15,676 individual events — were “ recorded errors.
” “ These errors resulted in overall tabulation errors or ballots being sent to adjudication , ” the report says .
The high error rate “ proves the Dominion Voting System is flawed and does not meet state or federal election laws.
” The audit also noted vulnerabilities related to the ability of Dominion machines to be connected to the internet .
Sidney Powell , who is not part of the Trump campaign legal team , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ executive order calling on the director of national intelligence to assess evidence of foreign interference in an election .
If John Ratcliffe , the DNI , were to conduct such an assessment , she said , it would “ blow the mind of every citizen in the country who ’ s willing to look at the truth and the facts.
” “ Because we ’ ve never witnessed anything like this in the history of this country , and it ’ s got to be stopped right now or there will never be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ None Why was the vote count halted in key swing states on election night in a seemingly co-ordinated manner ?
• None What are the problems and potential fraud associated with mail-in ballots ?
• None Is the Dominion Voting System secure or not ?
The results of the 2020 US election will not only decide the future of the United States , but also determine the future of the world .
The whole world is watching and waiting – buckle up there could be a storm coming !

This is a brief follow up to a previous article in which I reported upon the use of the Dominion Counting System in the 2020 Presidential Election and President Trump’s 2018 Executive Order:-
“Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election – Issued: September 12, 2018”
Accordingly, I hereby order:
Section 1. (a) Not later than 45 days after the conclusion of a United States election, the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate executive departments and agencies, shall conduct an assessment of any information indicating that a foreign government, or any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, has acted with the intent or purpose of interfering in that election.
The 45 day deadline for the Intelligence Reports to be placed before the President expires on Friday 18th December 2020.
Much has happened following my previous article, so many twists and turns, thousands of sworn affidavits have been provided by witnesses citing evidence of alleged electoral manipulation and voter fraud.
Audit
Allied Security Operations Group conducted an independent audit of 22 Dominion Voting Systems in a small Michigan County they released their report on Monday stating:-
“We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results“. “The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors.”
Consequently, they advised that President Trump should invoke his 2018 Executive Order to ensure national security in the event of foreign interference in an election.
The report was published on the website of attorney Matthew DePerno, a lawyer in Anterim County who represented a voter in the case.
The County was in the news after the election when it was discovered that 6,000 votes had been flipped from President Trump to Joe Biden. The Michigan Secretary of State and the Antrim County Clerk both blamed “human error.”
But Allied Security insists it’s a “machine” or “software” error, calling it a “national security issue.”
Dominion machines are used in 28 states, serving some 40% of the population.
The report states the forensic examination of the tabulation log for 6 December found 68.05% – 10,667 of 15,676 individual events — were “recorded errors.”
“These errors resulted in overall tabulation errors or ballots being sent to adjudication,” the report says.
The high error rate “proves the Dominion Voting System is flawed and does not meet state or federal election laws.”
The audit also noted vulnerabilities related to the ability of Dominion machines to be connected to the internet.
Sidney Powell, who is not part of the Trump campaign legal team, also suggested Trump could invoke his 2018 executive order calling on the director of national intelligence to assess evidence of foreign interference in an election.
If John Ratcliffe, the DNI, were to conduct such an assessment, she said, it would “blow the mind of every citizen in the country who’s willing to look at the truth and the facts.”
“Because we’ve never witnessed anything like this in the history of this country, and it’s got to be stopped right now or there will never be another free and fair election.”
Analysis
Why was the vote count halted in key swing states on election night in a seemingly co-ordinated manner?
What are the problems and potential fraud associated with mail-in ballots?
Is the Dominion Voting System secure or not?
Will a Military Tribunal/Insurrection Act be invoked?
The results of the 2020 US election will not only decide the future of the United States, but also determine the future of the world.
The whole world is watching and waiting – buckle up there could be a storm coming!


politicalite--2020-12-21--TORY FURY: Vice-Chair of the 1922 Blasts Boris’ After Attempt to CANCEL Christmas

A TOP Tory MP has blasted bumbling Prime Minister Boris Johnson and claimed that he deliberately waited to announce Tier 4 until after MPs went home for Christmas .
Charles Walker , who is the Vice Chair of the powerful 1922 Committee of Tory backbenchers that has the power to dispose of failed Tory Prime Minister ’ s said Boris “ knew ” he was about to cancel Christmas Bubble plans and introduce tougher restrictions on Wednesday , but delayed deliberately .
Number Ten denied the claims last night but Walker told the BBC : “ I suspect the Government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on Wednesday and Thursday when they were still telling the House of Commons they planned to press ahead.
” “ I think many colleagues find that extremely egregious .
The Christmas period was passed into law by the House of Commons in a vote after a debate.
” Walker , who blasted Police for arresting an Anti-Lockdown protester outside Parliament earlier this month added : “ The view of most colleagues was that to be changed , another vote would be required in the House of Commons .
So I suspect a decision @ @ @ @ @ @ @ back to our constituencies.
” “ Surely at some stage a senior Government minster has to say ‘ I have offered my resignation to the Prime Minister ’ and the Prime Minister has to say ‘ Sadly I have had to accept it ’ ?
” ” Health Secretary Matt Hancock is also under fire and many in the Tory party want him gone from Health in the New Year .
Mr Hancock gloated over the weekend and said he and the Government “ acted very quickly and decisively ” but backbench Tories @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all out war in the New year .
Labour leader Keir Starmer also blasted Boris and said : “ Millions will be heartbroken by this news , having their Christmas plans ripped up with less than a week ’ s notice.
” “ At this time of national crisis , the British people want clear , decisive leadership .
All we get from Boris Johnson is confusion and indecision.
” GREAT Britain… once the roaring lion of the Western world has been reduced to a cowering kitten in the Covid rain and instead @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the change in weather , our weak Prime Minister is hiding in a cardboard box waiting for the rain to pass .
Britain needs a leader that knows what they are doing .
A leader who will make a decision and stick to it .
Politicalite can no longer support this Prime Minister and we are calling for an Election after Christmas and New Year or a change in leadership… unless Boris Johnson gets Britain moving again .

A TOP Tory MP has blasted bumbling Prime Minister Boris Johnson and claimed that he deliberately waited to announce Tier 4 until after MPs went home for Christmas.
Charles Walker, who is the Vice Chair of the powerful 1922 Committee of Tory backbenchers that has the power to dispose of failed Tory Prime Minister’s said Boris “knew” he was about to cancel Christmas Bubble plans and introduce tougher restrictions on Wednesday, but delayed deliberately.
Number Ten denied the claims last night but Walker told the BBC: “I suspect the Government knew they were going to cancel Christmas on Wednesday and Thursday when they were still telling the House of Commons they planned to press ahead.”
“I think many colleagues find that extremely egregious. The Christmas period was passed into law by the House of Commons in a vote after a debate.”
Walker, who blasted Police for arresting an Anti-Lockdown protester outside Parliament earlier this month added: “The view of most colleagues was that to be changed, another vote would be required in the House of Commons. So I suspect a decision was delayed until we were safely away back to our constituencies.”
“Surely at some stage a senior Government minster has to say ‘I have offered my resignation to the Prime Minister’ and the Prime Minister has to say ‘Sadly I have had to accept it’?””
Health Secretary Matt Hancock is also under fire and many in the Tory party want him gone from Health in the New Year.
Mr Hancock gloated over the weekend and said he and the Government “acted very quickly and decisively” but backbench Tories are said to be fuming and plan all out war in the New year.
Labour leader Keir Starmer also blasted Boris and said: “Millions will be heartbroken by this news, having their Christmas plans ripped up with less than a week’s notice.”
“At this time of national crisis, the British people want clear, decisive leadership. All we get from Boris Johnson is confusion and indecision.”
GREAT Britain… once the roaring lion of the Western world has been reduced to a cowering kitten in the Covid rain and instead of popping up an umbrella and adapting to the change in weather, our weak Prime Minister is hiding in a cardboard box waiting for the rain to pass.
Britain needs a leader that knows what they are doing. A leader who will make a decision and stick to it. Politicalite can no longer support this Prime Minister and we are calling for an Election after Christmas and New Year or a change in leadership… unless Boris Johnson gets Britain moving again.
Last march… READ MORE


politicalite--2020-12-20--CHRISTMAS WEATHER: Frost But No Snow Predicated

Frosty conditions will bring a “ seasonal feel ” to the UK during the festive period , but those dreaming of a truly white Christmas will be disappointed , the Met Office has said .
Temperatures across most of the country will stay in mid-single figures on Christmas Eve and Christmas Day , but no snow is expected to settle .
The Met Office said that despite a wet start to the week , temperatures would start to drop , and hats , coats and scarves would be needed for any household winter walks .
Tom Morgan , meteorologist at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could drop to minus 3C in parts of England and Wales on Christmas Eve morning .
Temperatures are expected to reach a high of 6C in London and the south of England on December 24 and a high of 5C on Christmas Day .
Parts of the north including Manchester face similarly low temperatures of 4C and 5C on Christmas Eve and Christmas Day respectively .
“ It ’ s going to be dry for the vast majority of the UK , and it will be a cold and frosty start to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” said Mr Morgan .
“ So there will be a seasonal feel in terms of white frost on the ground , but in terms of snow , we ’ re not anticipating any on the ground for the vast majority of the country , unfortunately .
“ It ’ s going to be a frosty Christmas rather than a white Christmas .
“ It ’ s a mild and wet start to the week in the south but turning much colder and sunnier for the Christmas period and I think everyone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it ’ s not going to be a white Christmas , people will still need their big coats and scarves and hats etcetera for any walks they may be going on over the Christmas period.
” Mr Morgan said there may be a light covering of snow in some eastern parts of Scotland on Christmas Eve , but none is currently expected on Christmas Day .
He added that temperatures at the start of the week would be “ milder than average ” ( around 13-14C ) for the time of year , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The Met Office said that flood watches were in place for southern parts of England and Wales following recent bouts of wet weather , and rainfall warnings may be necessary for the beginning of the week .
It comes as the Eden Project botanical gardens in Cornwall was closed on Sunday due to “ significant flooding ” on the site overnight .
A spokesman for the Eden Project said high volumes of rainwater caused several landslips on the site but there had been no injuries to staff .
“ Managers closed the site @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the damage , ” they said , adding that the site would be closed to visitors again on Monday when a further assessment would be carried out .

Frosty conditions will bring a “seasonal feel” to the UK during the festive period, but those dreaming of a truly white Christmas will be disappointed, the Met Office has said.
Temperatures across most of the country will stay in mid-single figures on Christmas Eve and Christmas Day, but no snow is expected to settle.
The Met Office said that despite a wet start to the week, temperatures would start to drop, and hats, coats and scarves would be needed for any household winter walks.
Tom Morgan, meteorologist at the Met Office, said the mercury could drop to minus 3C in parts of England and Wales on Christmas Eve morning.
Temperatures are expected to reach a high of 6C in London and the south of England on December 24 and a high of 5C on Christmas Day.
Parts of the north including Manchester face similarly low temperatures of 4C and 5C on Christmas Eve and Christmas Day respectively.
“It’s going to be dry for the vast majority of the UK, and it will be a cold and frosty start to the day, particularly for England and Wales,” said Mr Morgan.
“So there will be a seasonal feel in terms of white frost on the ground, but in terms of snow, we’re not anticipating any on the ground for the vast majority of the country, unfortunately.
“It’s going to be a frosty Christmas rather than a white Christmas.
“It’s a mild and wet start to the week in the south but turning much colder and sunnier for the Christmas period and I think everyone will notice that.
“Even though it’s not going to be a white Christmas, people will still need their big coats and scarves and hats etcetera for any walks they may be going on over the Christmas period.”
Mr Morgan said there may be a light covering of snow in some eastern parts of Scotland on Christmas Eve, but none is currently expected on Christmas Day.
He added that temperatures at the start of the week would be “milder than average” (around 13-14C) for the time of year, which is usually 8C or 9C.
The Met Office said that flood watches were in place for southern parts of England and Wales following recent bouts of wet weather, and rainfall warnings may be necessary for the beginning of the week.
It comes as the Eden Project botanical gardens in Cornwall was closed on Sunday due to “significant flooding” on the site overnight.
A spokesman for the Eden Project said high volumes of rainwater caused several landslips on the site but there had been no injuries to staff.
“Managers closed the site as a safety precaution and are assessing the damage,” they said, adding that the site would be closed to visitors again on Monday when a further assessment would be carried out.


politicalite--2020-12-19--TINA BROOKER: Full Report On Debate On Petition Against Compulsory Vaccination

ON 14th December 2020 , a Petition was placed before Parliament for debate .
The petition entitled “ Prevent any restrictions on those who refuse a Covid-19 Vaccination ” garnered 324,261 signatures .
The outcome of this debate could have the most profound consequences for those who choose not to partake in the Government ’ s experimental Covid-19 vaccination rollout .
Will the ability to participate fully within society be curtailed upon refusal ?
Time to take a closer look .
Prevent any restrictions on those who refuse a Covid-19 vaccination I want the Government to prevent any restrictions being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any potential Covid-19 vaccine .
This includes restrictions on travel , social events , such as concerts or sports .
No restrictions whatsoever .
You can not force someone to have a vaccination and should not be able to coerce them into it by way of restrictions .
We have to the right to assess the risk ourselves as we have done in the past .
There are currently no plans to place restrictions on those who refuse to have any potential Covid-19 vaccine…..
It was a lengthy debate I will try and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ link at the end of article .
The standard for testing and monitoring vaccines is higher than for most other medicines , because they are unusual in the medical world in that they are put into the bodies of healthy people , especially healthy children .
That means that the acceptable level of risk of harm is much lower than in cancer treatment , for example , for which we accept a certain level of risk , given the illness that we are battling .
If people need any proof that the anti-vax @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for public safety , they need look no further than Brian Deer ’ s excellent book , “ The Doctor Who Fooled the World : Andrew Wakefield ’ s War on Vaccines ” , which I had the pleasure of reading before today ’ s debate .
He expertly demonstrates the lies , the bad science , the personal ambition and everything in between that drives this well-funded and well-organised movement , which has ulterior motives to the ones it claims publicly .
Because of the anti-vax movement , children are now dying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been prevented from contracting , such as measles , mumps and rubella , which is an absolute disgrace .
Vaccinations should be strongly encouraged , and I encourage people to take up their flu jab , the MMR vaccination and others , and to take this Covid-19 vaccine when it comes .
However , it must be a matter of personal choice , and I in no way support punishing those who do not choose to take this vaccine , ever mindful that I want them to take it .
I wish that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we can convince them The debate centres around the fact that there must be an element of choice , and while the Government have said that vaccination will not be mandated at present , responses such as “ the Government will carefully consider all options to improve vaccination rates , should that be necessary ” may pose a question in the minds of some people about whether they will be made to take it .
I do not think that they will be , but I will listen to the arguments .
Many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dispelled , and I believe this debate is the time to ensure that one option is not enforced vaccination , or a penalty for not being vaccinated , or even a curtailment of activity .
Again , it is a point of persuasion .
While I am aware that other nations that may consider immunity passports alongside vaccination , it is my fervent belief that we must not penalise people who remain unconvinced .
I also express my concern over some of those on the internet and social media who promote the opinion—I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the vaccine could be harmful and would be detrimental to health and wellbeing .
I gently suggest that we need to listen to the scientists who have the evidence and the knowledge and who can deliver the convincing evidence necessary for people to understand that there should not be a fear .
I caution the internet and social media users against the drive that there seems to be to do that .
I understand that there must be a decent uptake for this vaccine to be effective , but I also understand that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and all the necessary evidence must be made public , so that everyone can weigh up the risks and benefits for themselves .
That freedom must be the cornerstone of any discussion of the vaccine .
I thank the 589 Wycombe constituents who signed the petition .
First , vaccines are a good thing .
I wish to add something said by the deputy chief medical officer , Professor Van-Tam : “ If we can get through phase one ” of the priority list— “ and it is a highly effective vaccine and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take , then we could in theory take out 99 % of hospitalisations and deaths related to Covid 19.
” ?
? )
That is his estimate ( ?
? )
That is a tremendous thing .
I will certainly have a safe and effective vaccine when it is my turn , and I encourage others to do so .
However , I will not gainsay those people who wish to refuse a medicine .
That brings me to my 2nd point .
Whatever we may think of other people ’ s opinions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we compel people to take a medicine .
It is clear from what my right hon .
Friend the Prime Minister has said that there is no question of the Government compelling people to take a vaccine for this disease , and quite right , too .
It is worth remembering that although the infection fatality rate for this disease is considerably worse than flu—I understand it is between 0.5 % and 1 % .
We are not talking about a 10 % infection fatality rate .
I dare say , if we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fatality rate , we would all support authoritarian measures without too much of a second thought , because such a serious disease would threaten our civilisation .
This disease , dreadful as it is , has an infection fatality rate of about 1 % overall , so there can be no question of coercing people directly to take the vaccine .
That brings me to the text of the petition , which states : “ I want the Government to prevent any restrictions being placed on those who refuse to have any potential @ @ @ @ @ @ @ further .
That is not about stopping the Government from compelling people to take it ; it is about ensuring that those people who , for whatever reason , do not wish to take the vaccine , do not lose their liberties as a consequence .
I understand from people better versed in medical ethics that this is known as implicit coercion .
One can imagine a circumstance in which , for example , an airline chose to say to people , “ You may not fly until you have had a vaccine.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ You can not come in until you have had the vaccine.
” On and on it would go , until reaching a point where unless people have had the vaccine , they can not live what most of us would consider a normal life , going to restaurants , shops or whatever it may be .
To me , that would be totally unacceptable .
Before moving on to why that would be unacceptable , I have to say that it would also be ineffective .
There is a difference between a vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being killed by it and a vaccine that stops someone shedding the disease on to others .
The harm principle in the philosophy of freedom is about constraining people ’ s liberties so that they do not harm others .
At the moment , a number of businesses that are looking at restricting their customers to those who have been vaccinated have not understood that , actually , we do not yet know whether the vaccine will stop people shedding the disease .
I turn to something that the Secretary of State for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the Pfizer vaccine .
When asked how many people will need to be vaccinated before life can return to normal , he said : “ The answer to that is we just do not know .
So the trials can tell you if a vaccine is clinically safe and if it ’ s effective at protecting an individual from the disease .
What we can ’ know , until we ’ ve vaccinated a significant proportion of the population , is how much it stops the transmission of the disease.
” I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t start seeking to restrict your customers ’ ability to come and do business with you because they haven ’ t had the vaccine.
” I can see that Ministers might face a temptation to say , “ Let ’ s allow the acceleration of the roll-out of the vaccine by turning a blind eye to property owners insisting on people being vaccinated before staying in their bed and breakfast , or whatever it might be.
” I understand the argument , but I have to say to the Minister , who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that we cross a Rubicon if we say that it is possible to discriminate against people on the basis of their health status .
That would be an ethical mistake , which we could regret for a very long time .
For those two reasons—because it is not an effective thing to do , and because it is morally wrong to discriminate against people on the basis of their choice not to take a vaccine—I will stand with the petitioners in asking the Government to prevent any restrictions being placed on people who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
I will not give the least succour to the anti-vaxxers , but I say to the Minister that people have all sorts of strange beliefs in this world .
If people do not want to take a vaccine , please let us not turn a blind eye to any kind of discrimination against them .
We can all agree that it is simply not the case that either the UK Government or the Scottish Government have any plans to mandate the covid vaccine and make it compulsory .
Indeed , the Scottish @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Government—have explicitly said that they will not utilise coercive measures to ensure compliance and increase vaccination rates .
We are in a very fortunate position to be able to discuss and debate the roll-out of a vaccine .
What a marvel .
I read that 70 % of the population needs to be vaccinated with the covid vaccine before we can return to normality , I hope that take-up will be higher than 70 % by the time the roll-out is complete .
Qantas airlines has said that it will not carry passengers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been vaccinated .
We do not know yet if that is a knee-jerk reaction , if Qantas will be a lone voice , or if individual businesses will seek to impose conditions on the public to access their services while the vaccine is rolled out .
I honestly doubt that that will happen .
It seems unlikely that businesses will be able to legally insist that those whom they employ must be vaccinated .
Nobody denies that people have the right to refuse the vaccine , but insurance companies will surely levy higher @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those who do not take up the vaccine , because they operate on the basis of risk .
What I have heard from constituents and what I have read is that the overwhelming majority of people want to stop having to worry about this virus .
They want an end to the restrictions that we face as soon as that is safely possible .
Many have contacted me—I am sure that I am not alone in the Chamber in saying this—to ask whether , in the roll-out of the vaccine , we could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who are living with a terminal condition , which makes their vulnerability to the virus very concerning .
I share the view that those who are living with a terminal condition ought to be prioritised for receiving the vaccine .
The hon .
Lady has outlined a concern on behalf of those who have terminal illnesses .
The families want to enjoy that bit of time with their loved one as well .
We can never ignore their feelings and input into this , either .
Yes .
I would expect and hope @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would be prioritised in the roll-out .
That is important , because those people have to be able to enjoy whatever time they have .
There is a minority—I believe it is a minority—of people who are concerned about the vaccine ’ s safety and/or efficacy .
As we have heard , there is a job to do in convincing them that the vaccine is safe .
However , that may not always be easy , with disinformation and conspiracy theories thriving on the internet .
I had no idea there were so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scientific expertise expounding their view that the vaccine is not safe , but that is not surprising , given that they are probably the same people who , throughout this entire pandemic , have been perpetuating the myth that the covid-19 virus is some fictional , mythical dark conspiracy .
We know that those who expound these bizarre theories are in the minority , but they manage to reach and even convince some people , and they frighten people .
GPs have raised concerns with us about the new rules being brought in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccinations will take twice as long , as patients need to be observed for 15 minutes .
Again , that might be on very good public health grounds , but I am keen to know from the Minister what they are .
We know that general practice per designated site has to deliver at least 975 vaccinations over a 7 day period .
Turning to the substance of what these 300,000 people have asked us to discuss , at the root it is about vaccine hesitancy .
It is very easy to talk @ @ @ @ @ @ @ glad that colleagues have not majored on that , because to an extent that is a straw man .
Multiple hon .
Members made contributions about just how thin the basis for those conspiracy theories or anti-vax sentiments are .
We could spend all day deconstructing them and never lose the argument , but that concerns only a very small proportion of the British people .
We know from polling , and from our constituency mailbags , that those people are a very small group indeed .
There is a much more significant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a majority—who are vaccine-hesitant , and entirely reasonably .
There is a pretty broad political consensus against compulsion , coercion or inconveniencing people into submission .
I know what our position is as the Opposition , but no one studies what the Government say more closely than we do , and I have never detected a desire for mandatory vaccination in what they are saying .
I hope that business will take the same view .
People ’ s unwillingness to take the covid-19 vaccine has a knock-on effect on vaccine hesitancy more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was in the World Health Organisation ’ s top 10 threats to global health—it was up there with a future pandemic .
It is something that we have to address , whether it is related to covid-19 or not .
In Denmark in 2013 , false claims in a documentary about the human papillomavirus vaccine led to a decline in uptake of around 90 % among some cohorts .
Similarly , between 2014 and 2017 in Ireland , vocal attacks on the HPV vaccine from the anti-vaccine lobby led to a drop in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
These things matter .
What we see through those developments , and through our experiences in this country , is that the best method of countering those views is through proactive , positive health-promoting campaigns .
I know that is something the Government are doing , and it is very welcome .
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business , Energy and Industrial Strategy – ( Nadhim Zahawi ) I will hopefully address the excellent—as always—speech by my hon .
Friend the Member for Wycombe ( Mr Baker ) .
I am @ @ @ @ @ @ @ North Ayrshire and Arran ( Patricia Gibson ) both for her excellent speech and for her clear confirmation that neither the Scottish Government nor the United Kingdom Government will mandate vaccination at all .
At each point in the pandemic , every decision we have taken has been with the utmost consideration for its impact on our personal freedoms .
The petition that we are debating is a matter of great legal and ethical complexity .
Before I address some of those complexities , I will set out the facts .
First , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ restrictions on those who refuse to have a covid vaccination .
As my hon .
Friend the Member for Carshalton and Wallington reminded us , we have no plans to introduce so-called vaccine passporting .
Mandating vaccinations is discriminatory and completely wrong , and I urge businesses listening to this debate to not even think about that .
I will explain in further detail why that is the wrong thing to do .
I put on record my thanks to Professor Karol Sikora , who has many hundreds of thousands of followers , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dealt with the issue .
We have absolutely no plans for vaccine passporting .
Secondly , cards that were issued after people got their first covid-19 vaccination have been mentioned on social media .
Among other details , they contain the date of their second vaccination .
That record does not constitute a so-called vaccine passport .
Even if people are vaccinated , they must continue to follow the rules where they are , and keep taking the common-sense steps that are now so familiar to us—washing our hands , covering our face @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have raised many questions about the World Health Organisation and the required international response .
The United Kingdom Government have led the way .
We could do even more .
Next year , the UK will take up the presidency of the G7 , as the hon .
Member for Nottingham North mentioned ; we will need to deal with anti-vaxxers nationally and internationally .
We look forward to working with many nations on that challenge .
None of this reassures me , despite ministers repeatedly stating they have no plans for restrictions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ frequent “ warnings ” sent to businesses appear to me to be the MPs get out of jail free card – passing the buck to private corporate entities to implement via their terms and conditions of business .
The constant slurs towards so called “ anti vaxxers ” evidenced clearly their feelings with an especially low blow being aimed at Dr Andrew Wakefield whose only “ crime ” was to give the many parents of vaccine damaged children a voice .
The most chilling part of all has to be the two references @ @ @ @ @ @ @ • Last year , vaccine hesitancy was in the World Health Organisation ’ s top 10 “ threats to global health ” —it was up there with a future pandemic .
It is something that we have to address , whether it is related to covid-19 or not .
• Next year , the UK will take up the presidency of the G7 ; we will need to deal with anti-vaxxers nationally & internationally .
Despite the reassuring words from MPs that there will be no of loss of liberty and they are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I fear in those two paragraphs alone we have our answer don ’ t you ?

ON 14th December 2020, a Petition was placed before Parliament for debate. The petition entitled “Prevent any restrictions on those who refuse a Covid-19 Vaccination” garnered 324,261 signatures.
The outcome of this debate could have the most profound consequences for those who choose not to partake in the Government’s experimental Covid-19 vaccination rollout. Will the ability to participate fully within society be curtailed upon refusal?
Time to take a closer look.
The Petition read:-
Prevent any restrictions on those who refuse a Covid-19 vaccination
I want the Government to prevent any restrictions being placed on those who refuse to have any potential Covid-19 vaccine. This includes restrictions on travel, social events, such as concerts or sports. No restrictions whatsoever.
You cannot force someone to have a vaccination and should not be able to coerce them into it by way of restrictions. We have to the right to assess the risk ourselves as we have done in the past.
The Government response – 11 September 2020:-
There are currently no plans to place restrictions on those who refuse to have any potential Covid-19 vaccine…..
The Debate
It was a lengthy debate I will try and summarise the important information by attaching full link at the end of article.
Elliot Colburn MP (Carshalton and Wallington) (Con)
The standard for testing and monitoring vaccines is higher than for most other medicines, because they are unusual in the medical world in that they are put into the bodies of healthy people, especially healthy children. That means that the acceptable level of risk of harm is much lower than in cancer treatment, for example, for which we accept a certain level of risk, given the illness that we are battling.
If people need any proof that the anti-vax movement is driven by anything but concern for public safety, they need look no further than Brian Deer’s excellent book, “The Doctor Who Fooled the World: Andrew Wakefield’s War on Vaccines”, which I had the pleasure of reading before today’s debate. He expertly demonstrates the lies, the bad science, the personal ambition and everything in between that drives this well-funded and well-organised movement, which has ulterior motives to the ones it claims publicly. Because of the anti-vax movement, children are now dying from illnesses that they could easily have been prevented from contracting, such as measles, mumps and rubella, which is an absolute disgrace.
Jim Shannon MP (Strangford) (DUP)
Vaccinations should be strongly encouraged, and I encourage people to take up their flu jab, the MMR vaccination and others, and to take this Covid-19 vaccine when it comes.
However, it must be a matter of personal choice, and I in no way support punishing those who do not choose to take this vaccine, ever mindful that I want them to take it. I wish that they would, and I hope that we can convince them
The debate centres around the fact that there must be an element of choice, and while the Government have said that vaccination will not be mandated at present, responses such as
“the Government will carefully consider all options to improve vaccination rates, should that be necessary” may pose a question in the minds of some people about whether they will be made to take it. I do not think that they will be, but I will listen to the arguments.
Many people need their concerns addressed and fears dispelled, and I believe this debate is the time to ensure that one option is not enforced vaccination, or a penalty for not being vaccinated, or even a curtailment of activity. Again, it is a point of persuasion.
While I am aware that other nations that may consider immunity passports alongside vaccination, it is my fervent belief that we must not penalise people who remain unconvinced.
I also express my concern over some of those on the internet and social media who promote the opinion—I will be careful how I put this—that the vaccine could be harmful and would be detrimental to health and wellbeing. I gently suggest that we need to listen to the scientists who have the evidence and the knowledge and who can deliver the convincing evidence necessary for people to understand that there should not be a fear. I caution the internet and social media users against the drive that there seems to be to do that.
I understand that there must be a decent uptake for this vaccine to be effective, but I also understand that those who have questions. Reliable information and all the necessary evidence must be made public, so that everyone can weigh up the risks and benefits for themselves. That freedom must be the cornerstone of any discussion of the vaccine.
Steve Baker (Wycombe) (Con)
I thank the 589 Wycombe constituents who signed the petition.
I want to make 3 points.
First, vaccines are a good thing. I wish to add something said by the deputy chief medical officer, Professor Van-Tam:
“If we can get through phase one” of the priority list—
“and it is a highly effective vaccine and there is very, very high up take, then we could in theory take out 99% of hospitalisations and deaths related to Covid 19.” (theory ??)
That is his estimate ( estimate ??) That is a tremendous thing. I will certainly have a safe and effective vaccine when it is my turn, and I encourage others to do so. However, I will not gainsay those people who wish to refuse a medicine.
That brings me to my 2nd point.
Whatever we may think of other people’s opinions, we cross an ethical boundary if we compel people to take a medicine. It is clear from what my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister has said that there is no question of the Government compelling people to take a vaccine for this disease, and quite right, too.
It is worth remembering that although the infection fatality rate for this disease is considerably worse than flu—I understand it is between 0.5% and 1%.
We are not talking about a 10% infection fatality rate. I dare say, if we were up at an 80% infection fatality rate, we would all support authoritarian measures without too much of a second thought, because such a serious disease would threaten our civilisation. This disease, dreadful as it is, has an infection fatality rate of about 1% overall, so there can be no question of coercing people directly to take the vaccine.
That brings me to the text of the petition, which states:
“I want the Government to prevent any restrictions being placed on those who refuse to have any potential Covid-19 vaccine.”
That goes a little further. That is not about stopping the Government from compelling people to take it; it is about ensuring that those people who, for whatever reason, do not wish to take the vaccine, do not lose their liberties as a consequence. I understand from people better versed in medical ethics that this is known as implicit coercion.
One can imagine a circumstance in which, for example, an airline chose to say to people, “You may not fly until you have had a vaccine.” A restaurant might say, “You cannot come in until you have had the vaccine.” On and on it would go, until reaching a point where unless people have had the vaccine, they cannot live what most of us would consider a normal life, going to restaurants, shops or whatever it may be. To me, that would be totally unacceptable.
Before moving on to why that would be unacceptable, I have to say that it would also be ineffective. There is a difference between a vaccine stopping someone from getting a disease and being killed by it and a vaccine that stops someone shedding the disease on to others. The harm principle in the philosophy of freedom is about constraining people’s liberties so that they do not harm others.
At the moment, a number of businesses that are looking at restricting their customers to those who have been vaccinated have not understood that, actually, we do not yet know whether the vaccine will stop people shedding the disease.
I turn to something that the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care said in relation to the Pfizer vaccine. When asked how many people will need to be vaccinated before life can return to normal, he said:
“The answer to that is we just do not know. So the trials can tell you if a vaccine is clinically safe and if it’s effective at protecting an individual from the disease. What we can’ know, until we’ve vaccinated a significant proportion of the population, is how much it stops the transmission of the disease.”
I would say to businesses “Please don’t start seeking to restrict your customers’ ability to come and do business with you because they haven’t had the vaccine.”
I can see that Ministers might face a temptation to say, “Let’s allow the acceleration of the roll-out of the vaccine by turning a blind eye to property owners insisting on people being vaccinated before staying in their bed and breakfast, or whatever it might be.” I understand the argument, but I have to say to the Minister, who I am sure understands the argument, that we cross a Rubicon if we say that it is possible to discriminate against people on the basis of their health status. That would be an ethical mistake, which we could regret for a very long time.
For those two reasons—because it is not an effective thing to do, and because it is morally wrong to discriminate against people on the basis of their choice not to take a vaccine—I will stand with the petitioners in asking the Government to prevent any restrictions being placed on people who refuse to have any potential covid-19 vaccine.
I will not give the least succour to the anti-vaxxers, but I say to the Minister that people have all sorts of strange beliefs in this world. If people do not want to take a vaccine, please let us not turn a blind eye to any kind of discrimination against them.
Patricia Gibson (North Ayrshire and Arran) (SNP)
We can all agree that it is simply not the case that either the UK Government or the Scottish Government have any plans to mandate the covid vaccine and make it compulsory.
Indeed, the Scottish Government—and, I believe, the UK Government—have explicitly said that they will not utilise coercive measures to ensure compliance and increase vaccination rates. We are in a very fortunate position to be able to discuss and debate the roll-out of a vaccine. What a marvel.
I read that 70% of the population needs to be vaccinated with the covid vaccine before we can return to normality, I hope that take-up will be higher than 70% by the time the roll-out is complete.
Qantas airlines has said that it will not carry passengers who cannot prove that they have been vaccinated. We do not know yet if that is a knee-jerk reaction, if Qantas will be a lone voice, or if individual businesses will seek to impose conditions on the public to access their services while the vaccine is rolled out. I honestly doubt that that will happen. It seems unlikely that businesses will be able to legally insist that those whom they employ must be vaccinated.
Nobody denies that people have the right to refuse the vaccine, but insurance companies will surely levy higher premiums for life and travel insurance for those who do not take up the vaccine, because they operate on the basis of risk.
What I have heard from constituents and what I have read is that the overwhelming majority of people want to stop having to worry about this virus. They want an end to the restrictions that we face as soon as that is safely possible.
Many have contacted me—I am sure that I am not alone in the Chamber in saying this—to ask whether, in the roll-out of the vaccine, we could include, as a priority, those who are living with a terminal condition, which makes their vulnerability to the virus very concerning. I share the view that those who are living with a terminal condition ought to be prioritised for receiving the vaccine.
Jim Shannon
The hon. Lady has outlined a concern on behalf of those who have terminal illnesses. The families want to enjoy that bit of time with their loved one as well. We can never ignore their feelings and input into this, either.
Patricia Gibson
Yes. I would expect and hope that anybody whose immune system was compromised would be prioritised in the roll-out. That is important, because those people have to be able to enjoy whatever time they have.
There is a minority—I believe it is a minority—of people who are concerned about the vaccine’s safety and/or efficacy. As we have heard, there is a job to do in convincing them that the vaccine is safe.
However, that may not always be easy, with disinformation and conspiracy theories thriving on the internet. I had no idea there were so many self-styled experts without any medical or scientific expertise expounding their view that the vaccine is not safe, but that is not surprising, given that they are probably the same people who, throughout this entire pandemic, have been perpetuating the myth that the covid-19 virus is some fictional, mythical dark conspiracy. We know that those who expound these bizarre theories are in the minority, but they manage to reach and even convince some people, and they frighten people.
Alex Norris (Nottingham North) (Lab/Co-op)
GPs have raised concerns with us about the new rules being brought in late in the day, so that vaccinations will take twice as long, as patients need to be observed for 15 minutes.
Again, that might be on very good public health grounds, but I am keen to know from the Minister what they are. We know that general practice per designated site has to deliver at least 975 vaccinations over a 7 day period.
Turning to the substance of what these 300,000 people have asked us to discuss, at the root it is about vaccine hesitancy. It is very easy to talk about the anti-vax elements. I am glad that colleagues have not majored on that, because to an extent that is a straw man. Multiple hon. Members made contributions about just how thin the basis for those conspiracy theories or anti-vax sentiments are. We could spend all day deconstructing them and never lose the argument, but that concerns only a very small proportion of the British people.
We know from polling, and from our constituency mailbags, that those people are a very small group indeed. There is a much more significant and noticeable chunk of people—though far from a majority—who are vaccine-hesitant, and entirely reasonably.
There is a pretty broad political consensus against compulsion, coercion or inconveniencing people into submission. I know what our position is as the Opposition, but no one studies what the Government say more closely than we do, and I have never detected a desire for mandatory vaccination in what they are saying.
I hope that business will take the same view.
People’s unwillingness to take the covid-19 vaccine has a knock-on effect on vaccine hesitancy more generally.
Last year, vaccine hesitancy was in the World Health Organisation’s top 10 threats to global health—it was up there with a future pandemic. It is something that we have to address, whether it is related to covid-19 or not.
In Denmark in 2013, false claims in a documentary about the human papillomavirus vaccine led to a decline in uptake of around 90% among some cohorts. Similarly, between 2014 and 2017 in Ireland, vocal attacks on the HPV vaccine from the anti-vaccine lobby led to a drop in uptake from 70% to 50%. These things matter.
What we see through those developments, and through our experiences in this country, is that the best method of countering those views is through proactive, positive health-promoting campaigns. I know that is something the Government are doing, and it is very welcome.
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy – (Nadhim Zahawi)
I will hopefully address the excellent—as always—speech by my hon. Friend the Member for Wycombe (Mr Baker). I am grateful to the hon. Member for North Ayrshire and Arran (Patricia Gibson) both for her excellent speech and for her clear confirmation that neither the Scottish Government nor the United Kingdom Government will mandate vaccination at all.
At each point in the pandemic, every decision we have taken has been with the utmost consideration for its impact on our personal freedoms. The petition that we are debating is a matter of great legal and ethical complexity.
Before I address some of those complexities, I will set out the facts.
First, there are currently no plans to place restrictions on those who refuse to have a covid vaccination. As my hon. Friend the Member for Carshalton and Wallington reminded us, we have no plans to introduce so-called vaccine passporting.
Mandating vaccinations is discriminatory and completely wrong, and I urge businesses listening to this debate to not even think about that. I will explain in further detail why that is the wrong thing to do. I put on record my thanks to Professor Karol Sikora, who has many hundreds of thousands of followers, who quoted me and said I eloquently dealt with the issue. We have absolutely no plans for vaccine passporting.
Secondly, cards that were issued after people got their first covid-19 vaccination have been mentioned on social media. Among other details, they contain the date of their second vaccination. That record does not constitute a so-called vaccine passport.
Even if people are vaccinated, they must continue to follow the rules where they are, and keep taking the common-sense steps that are now so familiar to us—washing our hands, covering our face and making space.
Hon. Members have raised many questions about the World Health Organisation and the required international response. The United Kingdom Government have led the way. We could do even more.
Next year, the UK will take up the presidency of the G7, as the hon. Member for Nottingham North mentioned; we will need to deal with anti-vaxxers nationally and internationally. We look forward to working with many nations on that challenge.
Analysis
None of this reassures me, despite ministers repeatedly stating they have no plans for restrictions upon liberties or vaccine passporting – the frequent “warnings” sent to businesses appear to me to be the MPs get out of jail free card – passing the buck to private corporate entities to implement via their terms and conditions of business.
The constant slurs towards so called “anti vaxxers” evidenced clearly their feelings with an especially low blow being aimed at Dr Andrew Wakefield whose only “crime” was to give the many parents of vaccine damaged children a voice.
The most chilling part of all has to be the two references to the World Health Organisation:-
Last year, vaccine hesitancy was in the World Health Organisation’s top 10 “threats to global health”—it was up there with a future pandemic. It is something that we have to address, whether it is related to covid-19 or not.
Next year, the UK will take up the presidency of the G7; we will need to deal with anti-vaxxers nationally & internationally .
Despite the reassuring words from MPs that there will be no of loss of liberty and they are very much pro freedom of choice – I fear in those two paragraphs alone we have our answer don’t you?
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/323442


politicalite--2020-12-22--MACRON & LE BODYGUARD: French Prez ‘Denied Affair with His Bodyguard’

FRENCH Prez Emmanuel Macron denied MORE rumours he was having an extra-marital affair with one of his male bodyguards , sparking even more claims about his personal life .
In 2018 , the French leader sacked his head of security , Alexandre Benalla after a video of him beating protesters went public .
In an astonishing turn of events Mr Macron was also forced to clarify that the bodyguard did not have access to France ’ s nuclear codes .
He denied the claims assuring the French people : “ Alexandre Benalla has never had the nuclear codes … Alexandre @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Daily Mail reported : “ Macron ’ s extraordinary comment , in response to internet rumours , was reported yesterday as he tried , but failed , to bluster through a growing crisis over his remarkably close relationship with the mysterious 26-year-old.
” This was the second time the President had to deny that he was gay after similar un-founded claims about an affair with the boss of French radio Mathieu Gallet .
French paparazzi also allegedly snapped salacious pictures of Macron with Gallet in a forest .
Macron later had Gallet sacked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was a cover to dispel talk of a gay affair between the two .
The rumours suggested that the French leader is hiding his sexuality with a political ‘ showmance ’ with Brigitte Macron .
Mr Macron hit back at the gossip by telling supporters : “ I am who I am , I have never had anything to hide.
” “ I hear people saying that I have a secret life or something .
It ’ s not nice for Brigitte ( his wife ) and because I share all my days @ @ @ @ @ @ @ me how do I manage it , ” Macron said .
He continued : “ If over dinners in the city , if on forwarded emails , you ’ re told that I have a double life with Mathieu Gallet or anyone else – then it ’ s my hologram that suddenly escaped , but it can ’ t be me !
” .
A French MP was also quoted as saying “ Concerning his private life , it is becoming known.
” “ He has a rich gay lobby , which supports @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The Local .
The French President was also pictured half-naked in a French gay magazine during the 2017 Election .
The cover had the headline : “ Coming out : a necessary fight.
” The magazine ’ s editor Christophe Sorettold told French media in 2017 : “ Many talk about having revived the controversy about the possible homosexuality of the candidate [ Macron ] , ” “ The latter clearly explained himself by indicating that he loved his wife and had no connection with a man .
We do not revive this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” READ MORE ON MACRON AND THE OTHER MAN

239 SHARES Share Tweet
FRENCH Prez Emmanuel Macron denied MORE rumours he was having an extra-marital affair with one of his male bodyguards, sparking even more claims about his personal life.
In 2018, the French leader sacked his head of security, Alexandre Benalla after a video of him beating protesters went public.
In an astonishing turn of events Mr Macron was also forced to clarify that the bodyguard did not have access to France’s nuclear codes.
He denied the claims assuring the French people: “Alexandre Benalla has never had the nuclear codes … Alexandre Benalla is not my lover.”
The Daily Mail reported: “Macron’s extraordinary comment, in response to internet rumours, was reported yesterday as he tried, but failed, to bluster through a growing crisis over his remarkably close relationship with the mysterious 26-year-old.”
This was the second time the President had to deny that he was gay after similar un-founded claims about an affair with the boss of French radio Mathieu Gallet.
French paparazzi also allegedly snapped salacious pictures of Macron with Gallet in a forest.
Macron later had Gallet sacked from Radio France and some say this was a cover to dispel talk of a gay affair between the two.
The rumours suggested that the French leader is hiding his sexuality with a political ‘showmance’ with Brigitte Macron.
Mr Macron hit back at the gossip by telling supporters: “I am who I am, I have never had anything to hide.”
“I hear people saying that I have a secret life or something. It’s not nice for Brigitte (his wife) and because I share all my days and nights with her, she asks me how do I manage it,” Macron said.
He continued: “If over dinners in the city, if on forwarded emails, you’re told that I have a double life with Mathieu Gallet or anyone else – then it’s my hologram that suddenly escaped, but it can’t be me!” .
A French MP was also quoted as saying “Concerning his private life, it is becoming known.”
“He has a rich gay lobby, which supports him.” according to French news outlet The Local.
The French President was also pictured half-naked in a French gay magazine during the 2017 Election.
OHH LA LA!
The Garçon magazine, a bi-monthly magazine printed Emmanuel Macron posing topless.
The cover had the headline: “Coming out: a necessary fight.”
The magazine’s editor Christophe Sorettold told French media in 2017: “Many talk about having revived the controversy about the possible homosexuality of the candidate [Macron],”
“The latter clearly explained himself by indicating that he loved his wife and had no connection with a man. We do not revive this false story; we fight it!”


politicalite--2020-12-21--FEEDING OUR FORCES: Royals Mix Puddings To Donate To Royal British Legion

Christmas puddings mixed by four generations of the royal family have been distributed to armed forces communities at home and abroad as part of a Royal British Legion ( RBL ) project to bring festive cheer .
The Queen , Prince of Wales , Duke of Cambridge and Prince George each wielded a wooden spoon in aid of the RBL ’ s Together At Christmas initiative a few days before December 25 last year .
Now the festive treats have been given to serving military , volunteers and people supported by the RBL who took part in virtual gatherings to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ issues like loneliness and money concerns come to the fore .
At Buckingham Palace last December , the royals stirred four large puddings bowls , which traditionally brings good luck , and added four commemorative sixpences to be found by lucky recipients .
RBL director-general Charles Byrne said : “ Christmas can be a time when people ’ s financial worries or feelings of loneliness , isolation or anxiety are heightened , this year more than ever as people continue to adapt to life during the Covid-19 pandemic .
“ We want all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ feeling the pressures of the season to know that there is extra support available and the Legion is here for them .
“ Bringing people together , combating loneliness and helping individuals and families feel connected is an important part of our work all year round.
” The Legion ’ s first Together At Christmas events were due to be hosted at high street locations , care homes and Legion branches but the pandemic meant the gatherings had to be moved online .
The RBL has sent 99 puddings to families in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and to service personnel deployed in Bahrain this Christmas .
Veteran Poppy Appeal volunteer Vera Parnaby , 81 , from Consett , County Durham , who has raised more than £1 million , received a special Christmas pudding .
Julian Groves , 59 , who served with the Royal Army Medical Corps for 11 years , joined one of the get-togethers and discovered a sixpence in his pudding .
During the pandemic he has been receiving regular calls from the Legion ’ s Telephone Buddy service to help with his social isolation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s incredibly special to be part of Together At Christmas and I was amazed to discover the sixpence .
“ I ’ ve never done anything like this before but the sense of comradeship it created made it feel like being back in the forces .
“ No matter how tough things are , the Legion always rallies round , making sure everyone is looked after .
”

Christmas puddings mixed by four generations of the royal family have been distributed to armed forces communities at home and abroad as part of a Royal British Legion (RBL) project to bring festive cheer.
The Queen, Prince of Wales, Duke of Cambridge and Prince George each wielded a wooden spoon in aid of the RBL’s Together At Christmas initiative a few days before December 25 last year.
Now the festive treats have been given to serving military, volunteers and people supported by the RBL who took part in virtual gatherings to bring people together at a time when issues like loneliness and money concerns come to the fore.
At Buckingham Palace last December, the royals stirred four large puddings bowls, which traditionally brings good luck, and added four commemorative sixpences to be found by lucky recipients.
RBL director-general Charles Byrne said: “Christmas can be a time when people’s financial worries or feelings of loneliness, isolation or anxiety are heightened, this year more than ever as people continue to adapt to life during the Covid-19 pandemic.
“We want all those within our community who may be feeling the pressures of the season to know that there is extra support available and the Legion is here for them.
“Bringing people together, combating loneliness and helping individuals and families feel connected is an important part of our work all year round.”
The Legion’s first Together At Christmas events were due to be hosted at high street locations, care homes and Legion branches but the pandemic meant the gatherings had to be moved online.
The RBL has sent 99 puddings to families in the UK, others in Spain and Fiji, and to service personnel deployed in Bahrain this Christmas.
Veteran Poppy Appeal volunteer Vera Parnaby, 81, from Consett, County Durham, who has raised more than £1 million, received a special Christmas pudding.
Julian Groves, 59, who served with the Royal Army Medical Corps for 11 years, joined one of the get-togethers and discovered a sixpence in his pudding.
During the pandemic he has been receiving regular calls from the Legion’s Telephone Buddy service to help with his social isolation.
He said: “It’s incredibly special to be part of Together At Christmas and I was amazed to discover the sixpence.
“I’ve never done anything like this before but the sense of comradeship it created made it feel like being back in the forces.
“No matter how tough things are, the Legion always rallies round, making sure everyone is looked after.”
Additional Reporting By The Press Association


politicalite--2020-12-21--BACK OUR FARMERS! Make Britain Great, Buy British!

THE REMAINERS wring their hands in anguish over a future out of Europe and issue ‘ I told you so ’ statements over the apparent chaos at UK freight ports .
This is mainly because our politicians have failed to arrive at an agreement with the European Union after over four years of negotiation .
The situation is now compounded by the discovery that the coronavirus had mutated , and a total travel ban was imposed by France .
France has promised to help ease the congestion , but British goods continue to perish in container lorries and people are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ There is one measure that could be enacted by the people of Britain to lessen our dependence on exporting goods to the European Union in the long-term and ease the current situation and that is , simply , to buy British .
This is a prime time for our politicians to be backing a buy British campaign .
For the Brussels regime , it is anathema to favour one country ’ s products over another ’ s , but we can do that now .
In any case , many of them were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the time to capitalise on our impending freedom .
Buying British will have multiple benefits including generally propping up our economy post-Brexit , reducing our dependence on exporting to Europe , and reducing our need to import from Europe .
But the main and immediate benefit will be , post COVID-19 , to get money moving again within British commerce and industry allowing firms to survive and jobs and lives to be saved .
I am unaware of any campaign within the bounds of Westminster .
Our leaders are mainly preoccupied with ruining @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our lives .
The Chancellor ’ s ‘ eat out to help out ’ campaign was short-lived and now partly blamed for our current locked-down situation .
But there should be a parallel ‘ buy British to save jobs ’ campaign and any politician in need of resources to support such a campaign need not look too far .
Several movements such as Make it British promote British goods and provide relevant information on how likely people are to buy British .
Facebook groups exist to promote British goods and share news about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that already 90 % of people questioned think buying British is a good idea and that 40 % already buy British regardless of cost .
A majority believe that they can make a difference to the British economy by buying British and 48 % believe that British products are better than imported equivalents .
One area of confusion , especially over cars , was which ones were British ; a clear pointer to politicians about where to start helping us .
Turning to Facebook , the following forums exist : Buy British ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Buy British ( 3.1k members ) ; and Make Britain Great – Buy British ( 1.7k members ) .
Assuming that politicians will be slow to act , the public already have resources available to help them change their purchasing habits and increase their contribution to the British economy .

THE REMAINERS wring their hands in anguish over a future out of Europe and issue ‘I told you so’ statements over the apparent chaos at UK freight ports. This is mainly because our politicians have failed to arrive at an agreement with the European Union after over four years of negotiation.
The situation is now compounded by the discovery that the coronavirus had mutated, and a total travel ban was imposed by France. France has promised to help ease the congestion, but British goods continue to perish in container lorries and people are losing their livelihoods as a result. There is one measure that could be enacted by the people of Britain to lessen our dependence on exporting goods to the European Union in the long-term and ease the current situation and that is, simply, to buy British.
This is a prime time for our politicians to be backing a buy British campaign. For the Brussels regime, it is anathema to favour one country’s products over another’s, but we can do that now. In any case, many of them were economic basket cases, surely this is the time to capitalise on our impending freedom. Buying British will have multiple benefits including generally propping up our economy post-Brexit, reducing our dependence on exporting to Europe, and reducing our need to import from Europe. But the main and immediate benefit will be, post COVID-19, to get money moving again within British commerce and industry allowing firms to survive and jobs and lives to be saved.
I am unaware of any campaign within the bounds of Westminster. Our leaders are mainly preoccupied with ruining the economy and imposing ever-stricter controls on our lives. The Chancellor’s ‘eat out to help out’ campaign was short-lived and now partly blamed for our current locked-down situation. But there should be a parallel ‘buy British to save jobs’ campaign and any politician in need of resources to support such a campaign need not look too far. Several movements such as Make it British promote British goods and provide relevant information on how likely people are to buy British. Facebook groups exist to promote British goods and share news about British products. Made in Britain indicate that already 90% of people questioned think buying British is a good idea and that 40% already buy British regardless of cost. A majority believe that they can make a difference to the British economy by buying British and 48% believe that British products are better than imported equivalents. One area of confusion, especially over cars, was which ones were British; a clear pointer to politicians about where to start helping us. Turning to Facebook, the following forums exist: Buy British (5.8k members); Let’s Buy British (3.1k members); and Make Britain Great – Buy British (1.7k members).
Assuming that politicians will be slow to act, the public already have resources available to help them change their purchasing habits and increase their contribution to the British economy.


politicalite--2020-12-21--SPEED SQUAD: Priti Trials Royal Navy Speed Boat Defender to Catch Migrants

HOME Secretary Priti Patel is trialling a state-of-the-art squad of speed boat surveillance technology that would fit right in a James Bond movie , in an effort to halt the swarm of migrants from France .
The 41-foot unmanned super speed boats with inteligent radar and HD cameras are capable of speeds of more than 40 knots and have been tested in the straits of Dover .
The boats will attempt be detect migrant boats and catch smugglers and dispatch agent on Jet Ski ’ s to send migrants back to France .
The Telegraph reports that the programme , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from a master Royal Navy vessel , and will deploy Border Force agents on jet skis .
The UK ’ s clandestine channel threat commander , Dan O ’ Mahoney told The Telegraph : “ We are working day and night to secure our borders and to stop small boats crossing the channel.
” “ This new technology could help in our mission to make these crossing unviable by gathering evidence for prosecutions , preventing uncontrolled landings and supporting operations to save lives at sea.
” Parts of this article courtesy of The @ @

HOME Secretary Priti Patel is trialling a state-of-the-art squad of speed boat surveillance technology that would fit right in a James Bond movie, in an effort to halt the swarm of migrants from France.
The 41-foot unmanned super speed boats with inteligent radar and HD cameras are capable of speeds of more than 40 knots and have been tested in the straits of Dover.
The boats will attempt be detect migrant boats and catch smugglers and dispatch agent on Jet Ski’s to send migrants back to France.
The Telegraph reports that the programme, known as ‘MADFOX’ is controlled from a master Royal Navy vessel, and will deploy Border Force agents on jet skis.
The UK’s clandestine channel threat commander, Dan O’Mahoney told The Telegraph: “We are working day and night to secure our borders and to stop small boats crossing the channel.”
“This new technology could help in our mission to make these crossing unviable by gathering evidence for prosecutions, preventing uncontrolled landings and supporting operations to save lives at sea.”
Parts of this article courtesy of The Daily Telegraph


politicalite--2020-12-21--HIDING THE BAGUETTE: President Macron Was Forced to Deny ‘Gay Affair’ with Radio Boss

PRESIDENT Macron was forced to deny rumours of an alleged romantic affair with a male media boss , sparking claims the French leader was hiding his sexuality with a political ‘ showmance ’ with Brigitte Macron .
The un-founded allegations were reported amid the French election in back 2017 , and Mr Macron shocked supporters by publicly dismissing the claims .
The rumour alleges that Macron had an male affair with the president of France Radio boss , Mathieu Gallet , pictured below .
Mr Macron hit back at the claims by telling supporters : “ I am who I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to hide.
” “ I hear people saying that I have a secret life or something .
It ’ s not nice for Brigitte ( his wife ) and because I share all my days and nights with her , she asks me how do I manage it , ” Macron said .
He continued : “ If over dinners in the city , if on forwarded emails , you ’ re told that I have a double life with Mathieu Gallet or anyone else – then it ’ s my hologram that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t be me !
” .
A French MP was also quoted as saying “ Concerning his private life , it is becoming known.
” “ He has a rich gay lobby , which supports him.
” according to French news outlet The Local .
The French President was also pictured half-naked in a French gay magazine during the 2017 Election .
The cover had the headline : “ Coming out : a necessary fight.
” The magazine ’ s editor Christophe Sorettold told French media in 2017 : “ Many talk about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ homosexuality of the candidate [ Macron ] , ” “ The latter clearly explained himself by indicating that he loved his wife and had no connection with a man .
We do not revive this false story ; we fight it !
”

292 SHARES Share Tweet
PRESIDENT Macron was forced to deny rumours of an alleged romantic affair with a male media boss, sparking claims the French leader was hiding his sexuality with a political ‘showmance’ with Brigitte Macron.
The un-founded allegations were reported amid the French election in back 2017, and Mr Macron shocked supporters by publicly dismissing the claims.
The rumour alleges that Macron had an male affair with the president of France Radio boss, Mathieu Gallet, pictured below.
Mr Macron hit back at the claims by telling supporters: “I am who I am, I have never had anything to hide.”
“I hear people saying that I have a secret life or something. It’s not nice for Brigitte (his wife) and because I share all my days and nights with her, she asks me how do I manage it,” Macron said.
He continued: “If over dinners in the city, if on forwarded emails, you’re told that I have a double life with Mathieu Gallet or anyone else – then it’s my hologram that suddenly escaped, but it can’t be me!” .
A French MP was also quoted as saying “Concerning his private life, it is becoming known.”
“He has a rich gay lobby, which supports him.” according to French news outlet The Local.
OHH LA LA!
The French President was also pictured half-naked in a French gay magazine during the 2017 Election.
The Garçon magazine, a bi-monthly magazine printed Emmanuel Macron posing topless.
The cover had the headline: “Coming out: a necessary fight.”
The magazine’s editor Christophe Sorettold told French media in 2017: “Many talk about having revived the controversy about the possible homosexuality of the candidate [Macron],”
“The latter clearly explained himself by indicating that he loved his wife and had no connection with a man. We do not revive this false story; we fight it!”


politicalite--2020-12-21--BORDER BEATER: Buy BRITISH to bypass the French Border War

HITLER tried to use imports into Britain as a negotiating tactic during World War Two as the French failed to close their border to Nazi Germany , decades after freeing France from the chains of Facism , they repay us by closing their Border to make Brexit less beneficial , the thing is , Brits kept calm and carried on under rationing for years , import blockades failed then , and it will fail for the French too .
The best way to get around this assault on free trade is to buy British !
Our supermarkets are filled with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ helping out hard working British farmers too , when life gives us EU lemons… make British vodka out of Potatoes !
The EU is harming itself more than it will harm the UK by blocking imports… Britain imports more from the EU than we send to them , they are hurting their own farmers and businesses more than they are hurting the British .
We can adapt and find better products , the EU can ’ t , this is no skin of Britain ’ s nose .
They can keep their snails @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stick it when ’ re the Sun doesn ’ t shine !

HITLER tried to use imports into Britain as a negotiating tactic during World War Two as the French failed to close their border to Nazi Germany, decades after freeing France from the chains of Facism, they repay us by closing their Border to make Brexit less beneficial, the thing is, Brits kept calm and carried on under rationing for years, import blockades failed then, and it will fail for the French too.
The best way to get around this assault on free trade is to buy British! Our supermarkets are filled with British goods and you’ll be helping out hard working British farmers too, when life gives us EU lemons… make British vodka out of Potatoes!
The EU is harming itself more than it will harm the UK by blocking imports… Britain imports more from the EU than we send to them, they are hurting their own farmers and businesses more than they are hurting the British. We can adapt and find better products, the EU can’t, this is no skin of Britain’s nose.
They can keep their snails, their cat urine tasting Champagne and stick it when’re the Sun doesn’t shine!
#BackBritain


politicalite--2020-12-21--MONEY MATTERS: What will Brexit Mean for Britain’s Day Traders?

SINCE January 31st Britain has gone solo after departing from the EU .
Over the past few years , this decision has caused widespread controversy throughout Britain due to the after-effects it was suspected to entail .
One of the areas of concern for businesses and investors was – what would this move mean for day traders ?
Regardless of how big or small your business may be , there ’ s no doubt that Brexit will take effect at some stage , so it ’ s important to know where you stand .
Another major concern was whether this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ British pound as a result of a ‘ Hard Brexit ’ .
This term refers to the fact that if there was no withdrawal agreement in place by the deadline , the UK would leave the EU with little or no trade deals and could , therefore , have a significant impact on the financial security and opportunities for businesses .
According to a report carried out by the BBC , 79 % of food within our supermarkets is imported from overseas , consequently , if there was no other option but to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it would mean that the assortment of goods and mass of produce could be affected .
In July , it was confirmed that Boris Johnson secured a trade deal with Japan , which was a positive move that Britain would survive after Brexit .
The good news is that the withdrawal agreement was signed off on January 31st 2020 , meaning that trade deals had been saved and the future of businesses and investments had been stabilised for the current time .
However , Northern Ireland protocol will leave the EU in January @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to EU regulations .
As a result , goods and produce arriving into the country will need to be assessed under EU standards before being sold .
Although it ’ s impossible to predict the future and the after-effects of Brexit in the coming months and years , it ’ s important to plan ahead to ensure your investments are protected in the event of the drop in the pound .
While there is the opportunity to make significant profits , there is also a possibility that you could make a substantial loss @ @ @ @ @ @ @ economic climate at any given time .
With this in mind , you could consider spread betting in UK as a safe and sensible investment option after Brexit .
This type of investment gives you the chance to buy and sell in over 8000 markets globally and spread your risk over various stocks .
Simply choose your stake size and how many pounds per point to stake .
Some of the other benefits of this type of investment include earning tax-free profits and having access to thousands of trading opportunities on a 24-hour @ @ @ @ @ @ @ earn you the best return per pound invested .
Backers of Brexit have agreed that leaving the EU will benefit the UK trade economy by having the freedom to set its own trade policy .
However , it is still very early days and the impacts of the situation are sure to be revealed in the coming months and years .

SINCE January 31st Britain has gone solo after departing from the EU.
Over the past few years, this decision has caused widespread controversy throughout Britain due to the after-effects it was suspected to entail. One of the areas of concern for businesses and investors was – what would this move mean for day traders? Regardless of how big or small your business may be, there’s no doubt that Brexit will take effect at some stage, so it’s important to know where you stand.
Another major concern was whether this move would reduce the value of the British pound as a result of a ‘Hard Brexit’. This term refers to the fact that if there was no withdrawal agreement in place by the deadline, the UK would leave the EU with little or no trade deals and could, therefore, have a significant impact on the financial security and opportunities for businesses. According to a report carried out by the BBC, 79% of food within our supermarkets is imported from overseas, consequently, if there was no other option but to accept a ‘Hard Brexit’, it would mean that the assortment of goods and mass of produce could be affected. In July, it was confirmed that Boris Johnson secured a trade deal with Japan, which was a positive move that Britain would survive after Brexit.
The good news is that the withdrawal agreement was signed off on January 31st 2020, meaning that trade deals had been saved and the future of businesses and investments had been stabilised for the current time. However, Northern Ireland protocol will leave the EU in January 2021 and until then, will adhere to EU regulations.
As a result, goods and produce arriving into the country will need to be assessed under EU standards before being sold.
Although it’s impossible to predict the future and the after-effects of Brexit in the coming months and years, it’s important to plan ahead to ensure your investments are protected in the event of the drop in the pound. While there is the opportunity to make significant profits, there is also a possibility that you could make a substantial loss, depending on the state of the economic climate at any given time.
With this in mind, you could consider spread betting in UK as a safe and sensible investment option after Brexit. This type of investment gives you the chance to buy and sell in over 8000 markets globally and spread your risk over various stocks.
Simply choose your stake size and how many pounds per point to stake. Some of the other benefits of this type of investment include earning tax-free profits and having access to thousands of trading opportunities on a 24-hour basis, that both interest you and earn you the best return per pound invested.
Backers of Brexit have agreed that leaving the EU will benefit the UK trade economy by having the freedom to set its own trade policy. However, it is still very early days and the impacts of the situation are sure to be revealed in the coming months and years.


politicalite--2020-12-22--YOU DECIDE: Vote For Your Favourite Politicalite Story of  2020

DESPITE Coronavirus dominating the headlines in 2020 , Politicalite ’ s biggest stories were not Corona related and we had @ @ @ @ @ and had website views of more than 17 million in the past year .
We @ @ @ @ @ Daytime telly star Phillip Schofield came out after his gay affair with a This Morning @ @ @ @ @ Serbian political abuse , exposed the British Government censoring a migrant murderer in Bolton , @ @ @ @ @ attacking working-class Brits , stood up to BLM marxists , covered race riots in the @ @ @ @ @ Lives Matter where to go , revealed plans for a new populist news channel and @ @ @ @ @ ’ s Black Lives stunt , Politicalite had it all… now YOU get to decide @ @ @ @ @ .
BGT : SO SO SO SCANDALOUS !
VOTE FOR YOUR FAVOURITE POLITICALITE STORY OF @

DESPITE Coronavirus dominating the headlines in 2020, Politicalite’s biggest stories were not Corona related and we had some massive stories and exclusives and had website views of more than 17 million in the past year.
We exposed the real reason why Daytime telly star Phillip Schofield came out after his gay affair with a This Morning runner, we reported on Serbian political abuse, exposed the British Government censoring a migrant murderer in Bolton, hit back at rapper Dave attacking working-class Brits, stood up to BLM marxists, covered race riots in the capital as Brits told Black Lives Matter where to go, revealed plans for a new populist news channel and called out ITV after BGT’s Black Lives stunt, Politicalite had it all… now YOU get to decide your favourite story of 2020.
THE BIGGEST STORIES
253.3k SHARES
57K SHARES
33.4k SHARES
30.9k SHARES
29.2K SHARES
28.1k SHARES
24.4K SHARES
4.7K SHARES
1.5k SHARES
2.7k SHARES
112 SHARES
382 SHARES
1.2K SHARES
702 SHARES
5,8K SHARES
4.1K SHARES
206 SHARES
17K SHARES
14.9K SHARES
VOTE FOR YOUR FAVOURITE POLITICALITE STORY OF 2020
[yop_poll id=”2″]


politicalite--2020-12-22--TIME TO LEVEL UP: Boris Johnson is FAILING Britain’s Poorest Amid Corona

FOOD poverty has been a controversial subject across Britain this year , and in the worlds fifth-largest economy , this a scandal that should shame us all , only it ’ s the poorest helping the poor , as always in Tory Britain .
Many attacked Marcus Rashford after he embarrassed Boris Johnson earlier this year by exposing food poverty , so Politicalite decided to do something to give back instead of waiting for the pampered ponces in the House of Commons .
Thanks to our readers , Tesco and Homeless Aid UK our # FeedThem campaign was able to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ meals and Christmas Dinners and spread some much needed Christmas joy to the poorest after a horrible year .
Prime Minister Boris Johnson has refused to help some of the UK ’ s most impoverished families .
These are white working-class families , people like many of our readers .
These are British people who need help .
I was deeply saddened to see the people we were helping today .
We delivered meals across council estates in Bolton – areas that never get the coverage they deserve in the media .
There @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for help , but there shouldn ’ t be .
It is a national disgrace that it has been left to Footballers , Unicef , Charities and Newspapers to feed the poorest in our society .
I ’ m a proud Capitalist .
I believe that hard-work should reward people and in the shark tank of Britain today , you need to be money-minded to take care of the ones you love , but as I ’ ve grown up and matured , I have realised that not everyone has the ability to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with asking for help and feeding our people .
It is clear that the Government ’ s Universal Credit system is not fulfilling the needs of the poorest .
Critics say that Benefit claimants spend money on Booze , Sky and Cigarettes .
That ’ s simply not true .
The Lockdown and Tier System forced upon us by Westminster as a ‘ cure ’ is worse than the virus , and it ’ s making struggling Brits struggle even more .
The Tories are no longer the party of the people ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Outside the Southern Westminster bubble , Northerners are angry , poorer and they are struggling like never before .
Up here in the North , life is tough .
A decade of cuts and Tory Austerity has left people skint and the poorest destitute .
These folk live payday to payday and this crisis is making poverty even worse .
Great Britain , the country that won TWO World Wars for our freedom from Nazi Germany is being cowed by a virus , and a leader that hasn ’ t got the faintest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ don ’ t have the financial luxury cushion to deal with Boris ’ flip-flopping Corona regulations that are sending the country into a state of psychosis .
Tier 3 and Tier 4 Lockdowns won ’ t solve anything , it is just putting off the inevitable .
Our brave heroes did not die in vain only to see a tyrannical Prime Minister turn into a wannabe Adolf without the Hugo Boss .
The Working-Class can ’ t continue under this gruesome economy smashing ‘ lockdown in all but name ’ without real financial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ offering of Universal Credit for those forced on the dole by Boris ’ Corona Crisis .
Publicans can ’ t pay underpaid hospitality staff with no trade .
Gig economy workers and Uber Drivers can ’ t drive around their kitchens and struggling self-employed builders and joiners can ’ t build houses in their back Garden .
The Working-Class politicians rebelling against the Lockdown Clown ’ s latest attempt to ‘ Control the Virus ’ know this , but the rest of the greedy pampered ponces in the Palace of Westminster have never @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t see the struggle of single working mothers unable to pay the leccy , and they don ’ t know the reality of living paycheck to paycheck .
They don ’ t have to choose to feed themselves or feed their kids whilst Tory MPs attack charities for helping some of the countries poorest kids .
They don ’ t have to live on the streets with no PPE , Sanitiser or Gloves .
They don ’ t know the reality of young enterprising money-minded fathers forced into a life of Organised @ @ @ @ @ @ @ living .
Gangs don ’ t do Furlough .
It ’ s get up and grind or Die .
Middle-Class Tories have some misconceived conception that the Working-Class are scrounging Benefit claimants .
They ’ re not .
They want to work , but the Government is taking away their jobs .
The Tier 2 Lockdown imposed on London in October will reportedly cost over 200,000 hospitality jobs .
The economic recovery for Boris ’ mishandling of the pandemic for the next few years , it ’ s going to be very , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t cover monthly expenses .
Most would rather risk their lives to put food on their families table .
Most would instead grind and survive than live in lockdown perpetuity on our knees .
Outside of the Westminster bubble , Northerners have had enough .
There are more Homeless on the street than ever before , Nurses and Careworkers are on reduced pay .
Careworkers who provide lifesaving support for Adults with Autism are forced to get by on £8.21 an hour whilst MPs in the House of Commons give themselves a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than 30 Taxpayer-funded Bars as Canteens .
What Canteen has a yearly bill of more than £6.2m ?
It ’ s time our Prime Minister did something about the biggest scandal in Britain today… Poverty .

FOOD poverty has been a controversial subject across Britain this year, and in the worlds fifth-largest economy, this a scandal that should shame us all, only it’s the poorest helping the poor, as always in Tory Britain.
Many attacked Marcus Rashford after he embarrassed Boris Johnson earlier this year by exposing food poverty, so Politicalite decided to do something to give back instead of waiting for the pampered ponces in the House of Commons.
Thanks to our readers, Tesco and Homeless Aid UK our #FeedThem campaign was able to help the Homeless and needy and provide meals and Christmas Dinners and spread some much needed Christmas joy to the poorest after a horrible year.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson has refused to help some of the UK’s most impoverished families. These are white working-class families, people like many of our readers. These are British people who need help.
I was deeply saddened to see the people we were helping today. We delivered meals across council estates in Bolton – areas that never get the coverage they deserve in the media.
There is still a stigma attached to asking for help, but there shouldn’t be. It is a national disgrace that it has been left to Footballers, Unicef, Charities and Newspapers to feed the poorest in our society.
I’m a proud Capitalist. I believe that hard-work should reward people and in the shark tank of Britain today, you need to be money-minded to take care of the ones you love, but as I’ve grown up and matured, I have realised that not everyone has the ability to help themselves. There is nothing wrong with asking for help and feeding our people.
It is clear that the Government’s Universal Credit system is not fulfilling the needs of the poorest. Critics say that Benefit claimants spend money on Booze, Sky and Cigarettes. That’s simply not true.
The Lockdown and Tier System forced upon us by Westminster as a ‘cure’ is worse than the virus, and it’s making struggling Brits struggle even more. The Tories are no longer the party of the people; they are treating them with contempt.
IT’S TOUGH UP NORTH
Outside the Southern Westminster bubble, Northerners are angry, poorer and they are struggling like never before.
Up here in the North, life is tough. A decade of cuts and Tory Austerity has left people skint and the poorest destitute. These folk live payday to payday and this crisis is making poverty even worse.
Great Britain, the country that won TWO World Wars for our freedom from Nazi Germany is being cowed by a virus, and a leader that hasn’t got the faintest idea what to do.
Working-Class Northerners don’t have the financial luxury cushion to deal with Boris’ flip-flopping Corona regulations that are sending the country into a state of psychosis.
Tier 3 and Tier 4 Lockdowns won’t solve anything, it is just putting off the inevitable.
Our brave heroes did not die in vain only to see a tyrannical Prime Minister turn into a wannabe Adolf without the Hugo Boss.
The Working-Class can’t continue under this gruesome economy smashing ‘lockdown in all but name’ without real financial support and an increase in the measly offering of Universal Credit for those forced on the dole by Boris’ Corona Crisis.
Publicans can’t pay underpaid hospitality staff with no trade. Gig economy workers and Uber Drivers can’t drive around their kitchens and struggling self-employed builders and joiners can’t build houses in their back Garden.
The Working-Class politicians rebelling against the Lockdown Clown’s latest attempt to ‘Control the Virus’ know this, but the rest of the greedy pampered ponces in the Palace of Westminster have never had a proper job. They don’t see the struggle of single working mothers unable to pay the leccy, and they don’t know the reality of living paycheck to paycheck.
They don’t have to choose to feed themselves or feed their kids whilst Tory MPs attack charities for helping some of the countries poorest kids.
They don’t have to live on the streets with no PPE, Sanitiser or Gloves. They don’t know the reality of young enterprising money-minded fathers forced into a life of Organised Crime and Drug Dealing to earn a living. Gangs don’t do Furlough. It’s get up and grind or Die.
Middle-Class Tories have some misconceived conception that the Working-Class are scrounging Benefit claimants. They’re not. They want to work, but the Government is taking away their jobs.
The Tier 2 Lockdown imposed on London in October will reportedly cost over 200,000 hospitality jobs. The economic recovery for Boris’ mishandling of the pandemic for the next few years, it’s going to be very, very, grim.
Universal Credit doesn’t cover monthly expenses. Most would rather risk their lives to put food on their families table. Most would instead grind and survive than live in lockdown perpetuity on our knees.
Outside of the Westminster bubble, Northerners have had enough. There are more Homeless on the street than ever before, Nurses and Careworkers are on reduced pay.
Careworkers who provide lifesaving support for Adults with Autism are forced to get by on £8.21 an hour whilst MPs in the House of Commons give themselves a £3,000 payrise and attempt re-classify their more than 30 Taxpayer-funded Bars as Canteens. What Canteen has a yearly bill of more than £6.2m?
It’s time our Prime Minister did something about the biggest scandal in Britain today… Poverty.