politicalite--2020-11-16--NIALL McCRAE: Can We Challenge The Official Covid Vaccination Narrative?

SHOULD you take the Covid-19 vaccine ?
The answer would be ‘ yes ’ if you trust the guidance of the government , medical establishment and the World Health Organisation , but people should not roll up their sleeves in a hurry .
For such a rushed medical product they should err on the side of caution , striving first to learn more about the vaccine and the disease that it is supposed to ameliorate .
My field of expertise is mental health , not immunology , but I write from an ethical perspective , having sat on a NHS @ @ @ @ @ @ @ believe that much of the existing vaccination programme for children ( e.g .
polio , measles ) is justifiable , and that informed consent from parents should always be sought rather than compulsion .
Indeed , the Nuremberg Code , following the horrific experiments by the Nazis , prevents forced medical intervention .
Every year , tens of thousands of older people succumb to influenza or pneumonia .
Since the 1930s drug companies have been developing flu vaccines , but effectiveness is often lower than 30 % due to the unpredictability of multiple @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also die from the common cold , another type of coronavirus .
No successful vaccine has ever been made for coronaviruses , at least until now .
Hasty production of a Covid-19 jab is a response to a pandemic that has caused over a million deaths , while lockdowns have destroyed livelihoods .
But the virus is not as deadly as initially feared .
The average age of Covid fatalities in the UK is 82 – a year over life expectancy .
Younger adults are rarely debilitated ; most are asymptomatic .
Children @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a stroke of lightning .
Arguably , the ‘ second wave ’ is a false epidemic based on flawed PCR testing , with the apparently high death toll due to the normal increase in upper respiratory tract infections in the cold , damp weather of late autumn .
Yet all eggs have been placed in one basket .
Tony Blair suggested that due diligence should be relaxed in the race for a Covid-19 vaccine .
Health secretary Matt Hancock ordered a massive consignment from Pfizer before the results were in .
Seemingly , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as proper safety testing ( normally taking two years ) will not be conducted before mass administration .
When the authorities state that the vaccine is safe , they simply do not know this .
My hesitation is shared by possibly half of the population .
Although a University College London survey of 70 thousand found that merely a fifth would refuse the jab , resistance appears to be growing on social media .
London Assembly member David Kurten found strong opposition in his Twitter poll ( although the sample was unlikely to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the University of Hull , who generally regards vaccination as an evidence-based benefit , told me : ‘ I ’ m not convinced the vaccine is bad per se but I ’ m convinced it ’ s being rushed into use and the technique of RNA vaccines is entirely new – experimental even ’ .
The government , however , is avoiding any debate or critique .
Mainstream media , under instruction by Ofcom , have pushed the official narrative on Covid-19 .
When it became apparent that the viral outbreak would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to accept that life could not return to normal until a vaccine arrived .
The media have played their part in softening the populace for the prospect of mandatory vaccination .
On 14th October , the Times published two letters on vaccine sceptics .
Dr John Orchard asserted : – ‘ Access to public spaces , events and transport , etc should be made conditional on proof of vaccination .
Anyone without such proof should be refused admission .
Vaccine deniers will then be free to vent their misguided opinions in glorious perpetual @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Anthony Berry , emeritus professor of management , who opined that ‘ people who refuse to be vaccinated could have to pay an additional element of income tax as an insurance premium against their needs for further treatment ’ .
Selection of these letters , without an opposing view , indicated that the ‘ paper of record ’ supported their stance .
Last week Tory MP Tom Tugendhat argued that vaccine-dodgers should be barred from jobs , bars , restaurants and other public settings .
Tugendhat is a staunch critic of China ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have British citizens injected against their will .
A concerted campaign to denounce ‘ anti-vaxxers ’ has progressed from propaganda and social media bans to the threat of criminal prosecution .
A survey reported in the Mail of Sunday suggested that four-fifths of Britons support the legislative proposal of the British Academy and Royal Society to arrest and imprison anyone who spreads false information about vaccines .
Anyone who criticises the Covid vaccine is smeared as an ‘ anti-vaxxer ’ ( this is absurd : I don ’ t like cheese , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The medical establishment characterises opponents as ‘ conspiracy theorists ’ .
There is certainly much of this on social media .
Covid-19 is regarded by cynics as a Trojan horse for a totalitarian New World Order , with health surveillance extending to all aspects of behaviour .
Bill Gates is their bête noire .
In its mission to reduce global population , the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation moved from promoting contraception into vaccines , with the rationale that healthier people produce fewer offspring .
A major funder of the World Health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ biometric identity for every child .
Allegedly , vaccination will be the means of inserting a microchip implant , which will eventually be used for sterilisation purposes .
Meanwhile microbiologist Judy Mikowits warns that mass administration of the Covid-19 vaccine will cause 50 million deaths in the USA alone .
Most Covid sceptics would regard such ideas as far-fetched .
But there are serious scientific and ethical questions to ask before whole populations become guinea pigs for an untested and vaccine that is likely to cause side-effects and unlikely to eradicate an endemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many of whom may have antibodies from natural exposure , to a disease of negligible risk to them ?

190 SHARES Share Tweet
SHOULD you take the Covid-19 vaccine? The answer would be ‘yes’ if you trust the guidance of the government, medical establishment and the World Health Organisation, but people should not roll up their sleeves in a hurry. For such a rushed medical product they should err on the side of caution, striving first to learn more about the vaccine and the disease that it is supposed to ameliorate.
My field of expertise is mental health, not immunology, but I write from an ethical perspective, having sat on a NHS ethics committee for 11 years. I believe that much of the existing vaccination programme for children (e.g. polio, measles) is justifiable, and that informed consent from parents should always be sought rather than compulsion. Indeed, the Nuremberg Code, following the horrific experiments by the Nazis, prevents forced medical intervention.
Every year, tens of thousands of older people succumb to influenza or pneumonia. Since the 1930s drug companies have been developing flu vaccines, but effectiveness is often lower than 30% due to the unpredictability of multiple strains and mutations. The frail elderly also die from the common cold, another type of coronavirus. No successful vaccine has ever been made for coronaviruses, at least until now.
Hasty production of a Covid-19 jab is a response to a pandemic that has caused over a million deaths, while lockdowns have destroyed livelihoods. But the virus is not as deadly as initially feared. The average age of Covid fatalities in the UK is 82 – a year over life expectancy. Younger adults are rarely debilitated; most are asymptomatic. Children have statistically more chance of dying from a stroke of lightning. Arguably, the ‘second wave’ is a false epidemic based on flawed PCR testing, with the apparently high death toll due to the normal increase in upper respiratory tract infections in the cold, damp weather of late autumn.
Yet all eggs have been placed in one basket. Tony Blair suggested that due diligence should be relaxed in the race for a Covid-19 vaccine. Health secretary Matt Hancock ordered a massive consignment from Pfizer before the results were in. Seemingly, adverse reactions are acceptable collateral damage, as proper safety testing (normally taking two years) will not be conducted before mass administration. When the authorities state that the vaccine is safe, they simply do not know this.
My hesitation is shared by possibly half of the population. Although a University College London survey of 70 thousand found that merely a fifth would refuse the jab, resistance appears to be growing on social media. London Assembly member David Kurten found strong opposition in his Twitter poll (although the sample was unlikely to be representative).
Professor Roger Watson of the University of Hull, who generally regards vaccination as an evidence-based benefit, told me: ‘I’m not convinced the vaccine is bad per se but I’m convinced it’s being rushed into use and the technique of RNA vaccines is entirely new – experimental even’.
The government, however, is avoiding any debate or critique. Mainstream media, under instruction by Ofcom, have pushed the official narrative on Covid-19. When it became apparent that the viral outbreak would prolong into the winter, people began to accept that life could not return to normal until a vaccine arrived.
The media have played their part in softening the populace for the prospect of mandatory vaccination. On 14th October, the Times published two letters on vaccine sceptics. Dr John Orchard asserted: –
‘Access to public spaces, events and transport, etc should be made conditional on proof of vaccination. Anyone without such proof should be refused admission. Vaccine deniers will then be free to vent their misguided opinions in glorious perpetual isolation.’
The second letter was by Anthony Berry, emeritus professor of management, who opined that ‘people who refuse to be vaccinated could have to pay an additional element of income tax as an insurance premium against their needs for further treatment’. Selection of these letters, without an opposing view, indicated that the ‘paper of record’ supported their stance.
Last week Tory MP Tom Tugendhat argued that vaccine-dodgers should be barred from jobs, bars, restaurants and other public settings. Tugendhat is a staunch critic of China’ human rights abuses, yet he would have British citizens injected against their will.
A concerted campaign to denounce ‘anti-vaxxers’ has progressed from propaganda and social media bans to the threat of criminal prosecution. A survey reported in the Mail of Sunday suggested that four-fifths of Britons support the legislative proposal of the British Academy and Royal Society to arrest and imprison anyone who spreads false information about vaccines. Anyone who criticises the Covid vaccine is smeared as an ‘anti-vaxxer’ (this is absurd: I don’t like cheese, but I’m not anti-food). .
The medical establishment characterises opponents as ‘conspiracy theorists’. There is certainly much of this on social media. Covid-19 is regarded by cynics as a Trojan horse for a totalitarian New World Order, with health surveillance extending to all aspects of behaviour. Bill Gates is their bête noire. In its mission to reduce global population, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation moved from promoting contraception into vaccines, with the rationale that healthier people produce fewer offspring. A major funder of the World Health Organisation, Gates is striving for a biometric identity for every child. Allegedly, vaccination will be the means of inserting a microchip implant, which will eventually be used for sterilisation purposes.
Meanwhile microbiologist Judy Mikowits warns that mass administration of the Covid-19 vaccine will cause 50 million deaths in the USA alone. Most Covid sceptics would regard such ideas as far-fetched. But there are serious scientific and ethical questions to ask before whole populations become guinea pigs for an untested and vaccine that is likely to cause side-effects and unlikely to eradicate an endemic virus. Why inoculate healthy people, many of whom may have antibodies from natural exposure, to a disease of negligible risk to them?


politicalite--2020-11-16--EXCLUSIVE: US Congress ‘Officially Tells Biden Campaign He’s NOT President-Elect’

CONGRESS has officially informed Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden that he is not yet President-Elect , despite the Democratic Party and mainstream media claims , Politicalite can exclusively reveal .
A letter leaked to Politicalite , the administrator of the General Services Administration Emily W. Murphy , who is responsible for recognizing a President-Elect for a potential transfer of power to begin told Biden ’ s team he was not President Elect .
Murphy claimed : “ There are enough state contests in question , such that there is not yet an apparent President or Vice President- Elect.
” “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Members sent you a letter that misrepresented the facts surrounding your responsibilities under the Presidential Transition Act of 1963 ( Act ) .
I write to correct the record.
” the letter read .
“ Under the Act , you , as administrator of the General Services Administration ( GSA ) , have the authority to provide government-funded transition assistance to the President-Elect and the Vice President-Elect .
However , this assistance can only occur after there are “ apparent successful candidates or the office of the President and Vice President , respectively @ @ @ @ @ @ @ You ] .
” “ There are enough state contests in question , such that there is not yet an apparent President or Vice President- Elect.
” “ The drafters of the Act anticipated three electoral situations where there would be an un-apparent President-Elect m : ( 1 ) a tie , ( 2 ) a plurality winner , or ( 3 ) the presence of extensive voter fraud or intimidation .
The third being applicable to the 2020 since the Trump campaign has raised questions and filed legal challenges in several states.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ if there is any doubt in the Administrator ’ s mind ” the Administrator does not have to release transition assistance .
Since States have not yet been certified an electoral winner and some states are still tabulating legal ballots , there remains doubt as to the winner.
” “ The precedent set by the Clinton Administration in the contested 2000 elections is that to ascertain an apparent President-Elect there would need to be a concession—which has not yet occurred in 2020—or no more legitimate continuing legal challenges—which has not yet occurred in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and past precedent set by President Clinton , as of today , there is no apparent President-Elect.
” “ A GSA spokesman recently stated that “ the GSA Administrator ascertains the apparent successful candidate once a winner is clear based on the process laid out in the Constitution ” I strongly encourage you to do just that : follow the Constitution and past precedent , not the media , when making your determination of the President-Elect .
This democracy relies on a rule of law and the law must be followed.
” The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump who told his more than 84 million followers on Twitter that the media should not “ assume ” Mr Biden will ascend to the Presidency .

Benjamin Jenkins, Sam Monaco and Rikki Doolan

23.4k SHARES Share Tweet
CONGRESS has officially informed Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden that he is not yet President-Elect, despite the Democratic Party and mainstream media claims, Politicalite can exclusively reveal.
A letter leaked to Politicalite, the administrator of the General Services Administration Emily W. Murphy, who is responsible for recognizing a President-Elect for a potential transfer of power to begin told Biden’s team he was not President Elect.
Murphy claimed: “There are enough state contests in question, such that there is not yet an apparent President or Vice President- Elect.”
“On November 9th 2020, Democratic House Members sent you a letter that misrepresented the facts surrounding your responsibilities under the Presidential Transition Act of 1963 (Act). I write to correct the record.” the letter read.
“Under the Act, you, as administrator of the General Services Administration (GSA), have the authority to provide government-funded transition assistance to the President-Elect and the Vice President-Elect. However, this assistance can only occur after there are “apparent successful candidates or the office of the President and Vice President, respectively, as ascertained by the Administrator [You].”
“There are enough state contests in question, such that there is not yet an apparent President or Vice President- Elect.”
“The drafters of the Act anticipated three electoral situations where there would be an un-apparent President-Elect m: (1) a tie, (2) a plurality winner, or (3) the presence of extensive voter fraud or intimidation. The third being applicable to the 2020 since the Trump campaign has raised questions and filed legal challenges in several states.”
“The drafters concluded that “if there is any doubt in the Administrator’s mind” the Administrator does not have to release transition assistance. Since States have not yet been certified an electoral winner and some states are still tabulating legal ballots, there remains doubt as to the winner.”
“The precedent set by the Clinton Administration in the contested 2000 elections is that to ascertain an apparent President-Elect there would need to be a concession—which has not yet occurred in 2020—or no more legitimate continuing legal challenges—which has not yet occurred in 2020.”
“According to Congressional intent and past precedent set by President Clinton, as of today, there is no apparent President-Elect.”
“A GSA spokesman recently stated that “the GSA Administrator ascertains the apparent successful candidate once a winner is clear based on the process laid out in the Constitution” I strongly encourage you to do just that: follow the Constitution and past precedent, not the media, when making your determination of the President-Elect. This democracy relies on a rule of law and the law must be followed.”
The letter followed a tweet by President Donald Trump who told his more than 84 million followers on Twitter that the media should not “assume” Mr Biden will ascend to the Presidency.
More follows.


politicalite--2020-11-16--FEDERAL PROSECUTOR: We have the evidence to charge the Biden campaign with Voter Fraud in multiple s

FEDERAL PROSECUTOR: We have the evidence to charge the Biden campaign with Voter Fraud in multiple states

FEDERAL prosecutor and Trump 2020 campaign lawyer Sydney Powell has announced that the president ’ s legal team is receiving a deluge of evidence concerning voter fraud and irregularities .
With the current Presidential election hotly contested , this latest bombshell is a massive blow to both the Democrat Party generally and the Biden Presidential Campaign specifically .
“ We ’ re getting ready to overturn election results in multiple states , ” Powell said on Fox News ’ Sunday Morning Futures , adding that she has enough evidence of election fraud to launch a widespread criminal investigation .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ having the evidence to back it up.
” Powell said that “ elections software switched millions of votes from President Donald Trump to Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.
” Powell , who is also counsel National Security Advisor Michael Flynn , has engineered a stunning comeback with the Department of Justice moving to drop charges against the war veteran .
Now she ’ s leading the cavalry charge to save both President Trump ’ s re election , as well as American election integrity .
Powell said “ a whistleblower has come forward @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to rig elections.
” “ He saw it happen in other countries , ” she said , apparently referring to election hardware and software by Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic , or perhaps other software and machines .
“ We have so much evidence , I feel like it ’ s coming in through a fire hose , ” Powell said .
She declined to elaborate when prompted by Fox News host Maria Bartiromo .
“ They can stick a thumb drive in the [ voting ] machine , they can upload software @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from Germany or Venezuela even , ” Powell said , adding that operations “ can watch votes in real-time ” and “ can shift votes in real-time , ” or alleged bad actors can “ remote access anything.
” “ We ’ ve identified mathematically the exact algorithm they ’ ve used—and planned to use from the beginning ” that allegedly switched votes to Biden , Powell said .
Powell also referred to a 2019 investigation by Sens .
Amy Klobuchar ( D-Minn. ) , Elizabeth Warren ( D-Mass . )
, Ron @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as other Democratic lawmakers into Dominion Voting Systems , Election Systems & Software , and Hart InterCivic .
The senators had expressed concerns about the security of the voting systems .
“ ( W ) e have concerns about the spread and effect of private equity investment in many sectors of the economy , including the election technology industry—an integral part of our nation ’ s democratic process , ” wrote the lawmakers in their letters to the firms about a year ago .
“ These problems threaten the integrity of our elections @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that are strong , durable , and not to attack.
” Later in the Sunday Morning Futures interview on Fox News , Powell said that her team has “ detected voting irregularities that are inexplicable ” in states where officials believe they have valid systems .

17k SHARES Share Tweet
FEDERAL prosecutor and Trump 2020 campaign lawyer Sidney Powell has announced that the president’s legal team is receiving a deluge of evidence concerning voter fraud and irregularities.
With the current Presidential election hotly contested, this latest bombshell is a massive blow to both the Democrat Party generally and the Biden Presidential Campaign specifically.
“We’re getting ready to overturn election results in multiple states,” Powell said on Fox News’ Sunday Morning Futures, adding that she has enough evidence of election fraud to launch a widespread criminal investigation. “I don’t make comments without having the evidence to back it up.”
Powell said that “elections software switched millions of votes from President Donald Trump to Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.”
Powell, who is also counsel National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, has engineered a stunning comeback with the Department of Justice moving to drop charges against the war veteran.
Now she’s leading the cavalry charge to save both President Trump’s re election, as well as American election integrity.
Powell said “a whistleblower has come forward alleging that the voting software was designed to rig elections.”
“He saw it happen in other countries,” she said, apparently referring to election hardware and software by Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic, or perhaps other software and machines.
“We have so much evidence, I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose,” Powell said. She declined to elaborate when prompted by Fox News host Maria Bartiromo.
“They can stick a thumb drive in the [voting] machine, they can upload software to it even from the Internet … from Germany or Venezuela even,” Powell said, adding that operations “can watch votes in real-time” and “can shift votes in real-time,” or alleged bad actors can “remote access anything.”
“We’ve identified mathematically the exact algorithm they’ve used—and planned to use from the beginning” that allegedly switched votes to Biden, Powell said.
Powell also referred to a 2019 investigation by Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), as well as other Democratic lawmakers into Dominion Voting Systems, Election Systems & Software, and Hart InterCivic. The senators had expressed concerns about the security of the voting systems.
“(W)e have concerns about the spread and effect of private equity investment in many sectors of the economy, including the election technology industry—an integral part of our nation’s democratic process,” wrote the lawmakers in their letters to the firms about a year ago. “These problems threaten the integrity of our elections and demonstrate the importance of election systems that are strong, durable, and not to attack.”
Later in the Sunday Morning Futures interview on Fox News, Powell said that her team has “detected voting irregularities that are inexplicable” in states where officials believe they have valid systems.
More follows.


politicalite--2020-11-16--HE’S OFF… AGAIN: Boris Johnson Self-Isolates Following Cummings Firing

BORIS Johnson will be taking a break , yet again…for 14 days after being forced to self-isolate due to coming @ @ @ @ @ has tested positive for COVID-19 .
The Prime Minister hit Twitter and said : “ @ @ @ @ @ ve been instructed by our NHS Test & Trace scheme to self-isolate for two weeks @ @ @ @ @ with someone with Covid-19.
” “ I ’ m in good health and have no @ @ @ @ @ to lead on our response to the virus & our plans to # BuildBackBetter ” @ @ @ @ @ was diagnosed with Covid in early 2019 , being forced to go to St Thomas @ @ @ @ @ where he stayed for a few days .

BORIS Johnson will be taking a break, yet again…for 14 days after being forced to self-isolate due to coming into contact with someone who has tested positive for COVID-19.
The Prime Minister hit Twitter and said: “Hi folks, I’ve been instructed by our NHS Test & Trace scheme to self-isolate for two weeks, after being in contact with someone with Covid-19.”
Hi folks, I’ve been instructed by our NHS Test & Trace scheme to self-isolate for two weeks, after being in contact with someone with Covid-19. I’m in good health and have no symptoms, and will continue to lead on our response to the virus & our plans to #BuildBackBetter pic.twitter.com/yNgIme8lOz — Boris Johnson (@BorisJohnson) November 16, 2020
“I’m in good health and have no symptoms, and will continue to lead on our response to the virus & our plans to #BuildBackBetter”
This comes after the PM was diagnosed with Covid in early 2019, being forced to go to St Thomas’ Hospital in Central London where he stayed for a few days.
More follows.


politicalite--2020-11-16--TINA BROOKER: The Virus Does Not Care About Politics

FRANCIS Hoar , a Barrister who is working alongside Simon Dolan on a Court case against the Government regarding their lockdown policy has just tweeted out what I believe to be one of the most significant studies into the efficacy ( or not ) of the lockdown policy .
This military study to my mind serves to prove that locking down a population plays no part in the trajectory of a virus .
If this was possible , you can make an argument that at least lockdowns , despite their astronomical social and economic costs , achieve something .
If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ embarked on a catastrophic experiment that has destroyed billions of lives , and all expectation of human rights and liberties , with no payoff at all .
Every epidemic model being flung around in March built in the assumption that lockdowns would control the virus .
In the early days , it was about preserving hospital capacity .
Later it became a general principle : slow the spread .
The methods were the same in nearly every country .
Ban large gatherings .
Close schools .
Shutter businesses .
Enforce stay-home orders .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ restrictions .
Nothing like this has been tried in the whole history of humanity , certainly not on this scale This study goes to the heart of the issue of lockdowns .
The question has always been whether and to what extent a lockdown , however extreme , is capable of suppressing the virus .
AIER has long highlighted studies that show no gain in virus management from lockdowns .
Even as early as April , a major data scientist said that this virus becomes endemic in 70 days after the first round @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The largest global study of lockdowns compared with deaths as published in The Lancet found no association between coercive stringencies and deaths per million .
To test further might seem superfluous but , for whatever reason , governments all over the world are still are under the impression that they can affect viral transmissions through a range of “ nonpharmaceutical interventions ” ( NPIs ) like mandatory masks , forced human separation , stay-at-home orders , bans of gatherings , business and school closures , and extreme travel restrictions .
Nothing like this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the whole of human history , so one might suppose that policy makers have some basis for their confidence that these measures accomplish something , but have they ?
The Virus Doesn ’ t Care about Your Policies Based on the data , there seems to be no relationship between lockdowns and lives saved .
A study conducted by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in cooperation with the Naval Medical Research Centre sought to test the whole idea of lockdowns .
In May 2020 – 3,143 new recruits to the Marines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a study of extreme quarantine ( along with extreme antivirus measures ) or not .
The study was called CHARM , which stands for COVID-19 Health Action Response for Marines .
Of the recruits asked , a total of 1,848 young people agreed to be guinea pigs in this experiment .
The remaining ones went about their normal basic training in regular ways .
What did the CHARM recruits have to do ?
The study explains , and , as you will see , they faced an even more strict regime that has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
All recruits wore double-layered cloth masks at all times indoors and outdoors , except when sleeping or eating ; practiced social distancing of at least 6 feet ; were not allowed to leave campus ; did not have access to personal electronics and other items that might contribute to surface transmission ; and routinely washed their hands .
They slept in double-occupancy rooms with sinks , ate in shared dining facilities , and used shared bathrooms .
All recruits cleaned their rooms daily , sanitized bathrooms after each use with bleach wipes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dining hall that was cleaned with bleach after each platoon had eaten .
Most instruction and exercises were conducted outdoors .
All movement of recruits was supervised , and unidirectional flow was implemented , with designated building entry and exit points to minimize contact among persons .
All recruits , regardless of participation in the study , underwent daily temperature and symptom screening .
6 instructors who were assigned to each platoon worked in 8-hour shifts and enforced the quarantine measures .
If recruits reported any signs or symptoms consistent with Covid-19 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rapid qPCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 , and were placed in isolation pending the results of testing .
Instructors were also restricted to campus , were required to wear masks , were provided with pre-plated meals , and underwent daily temperature checks and symptom screening .
Instructors who were assigned to a platoon in which a positive case was diagnosed underwent rapid qPCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 , and , if the result was positive , the instructor was removed from duty .
Recruits and instructors were prohibited from interacting with campus support staff , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ After each class completed quarantine , a deep bleach cleaning of surfaces was performed in the bathrooms , showers , bedrooms , and hallways in the dormitories , and the dormitory remained unoccupied for at least 72 hours before re-occupancy .
This is an environment where those in charge do not mess around .
There was surely close to 100 % compliance , as compared with , for example , a typical college campus .
What were the results ?
Incredibly , 2 % of the CHARM recruits still contracted the virus , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Our study showed that in a group of predominantly young male military recruits , approximately 2 % became positive for SARS-CoV-2 , as determined by qPCR assay , during a 2-week , strictly enforced quarantine.
” And how does this compare to the control group that was not subjected to the strict regime ?
The non-participants actually contracted the virus at a slightly lower rate than those who were under an extreme regime .
Conversely , extreme enforcement of NPIs was associated with a greater degree of infection .
No national @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – the most important finding of all has been omitted and that is that extreme quarantine among military recruits did absolutely nothing to stop the virus compared with a non-quarantine group .
Here are four actual media headlines about the study that miss this point entirely : • US Navy : “ Navy/Marine Corps COVID-19 Study Findings Published in New England Journal of Medicine ” This study is important because of the social structure of control here .
It ’ s one thing to observe no effects from national lockdowns .
But with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ near homogeneous group based on age , health , and densities of living .
And even here , you see confirmed what so many other studies have shown : lockdowns are pointlessly destructive .
They do not manage the disease .
They crush human liberty and produce astonishing costs , such as 5.53 million years of lost life from the closing of schools alone .
The lockdowners keep telling us to pay attention to science .
Well let ’ s start doing that , shall we ?
When the results contradict their pro-compulsion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do not exist and barrel ahead with their scary plans to disable all social functioning in the presence of a virus .
Lockdowns are not science .
They never have been .
They are an experiment in social/political top-down management and control that is without precedent in cost to life and liberty .
As with everything surrounding the “ Covid-19 ” narrative coming from what I term the “ political scientists ” and politicians does not add up it never has for me and for so many others who choose to seek more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the programming emanating from our TV screens and radios .
From masks to lockdown to vaccines I have investigated them all and that research has led me to take my own path and make my own choices for myself and my family .
I have always been of the firm belief that healthcare decisions should ultimately lie in our own hands and not that of the state and from the conclusion of this study there is clear validation for the path I have chosen .
The million dollar question that MUST now be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and when ?

12 SHARES Share Tweet
FRANCIS Hoar, a Barrister who is working alongside Simon Dolan on a Court case against the Government regarding their lockdown policy has just tweeted out what I believe to be one of the most significant studies into the efficacy (or not) of the lockdown policy.
This military study to my mind serves to prove that locking down a population plays no part in the trajectory of a virus.
If this was possible, you can make an argument that at least lockdowns, despite their astronomical social and economic costs, achieve something. If not, nations the world over have embarked on a catastrophic experiment that has destroyed billions of lives, and all expectation of human rights and liberties, with no payoff at all.
Every epidemic model being flung around in March built in the assumption that lockdowns would control the virus. In the early days, it was about preserving hospital capacity. Later it became a general principle: slow the spread. The methods were the same in nearly every country. Ban large gatherings. Close schools. Shutter businesses. Enforce stay-home orders. Mandate human separation. Masks. Travel restrictions.
Nothing like this has been tried in the whole history of humanity, certainly not on this scale
New England Journal of Medicine Publish Military Study
This study goes to the heart of the issue of lockdowns. The question has always been whether and to what extent a lockdown, however extreme, is capable of suppressing the virus.
AIER has long highlighted studies that show no gain in virus management from lockdowns. Even as early as April, a major data scientist said that this virus becomes endemic in 70 days after the first round of infection, regardless of policies.
The largest global study of lockdowns compared with deaths as published in The Lancet found no association between coercive stringencies and deaths per million.
To test further might seem superfluous but, for whatever reason, governments all over the world are still are under the impression that they can affect viral transmissions through a range of “nonpharmaceutical interventions” (NPIs) like mandatory masks, forced human separation, stay-at-home orders, bans of gatherings, business and school closures, and extreme travel restrictions.
Nothing like this has been tried on this scale in the whole of human history, so one might suppose that policy makers have some basis for their confidence that these measures accomplish something, but have they?
The Virus Doesn’t Care about Your Policies
Based on the data, there seems to be no relationship between lockdowns and lives saved.
A study conducted by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in cooperation with the Naval Medical Research Centre sought to test the whole idea of lockdowns.
In May 2020 – 3,143 new recruits to the Marines were given the option to participate in a study of extreme quarantine (along with extreme antivirus measures) or not. The study was called CHARM, which stands for COVID-19 Health Action Response for Marines.
Of the recruits asked, a total of 1,848 young people agreed to be guinea pigs in this experiment. The remaining ones went about their normal basic training in regular ways.
What did the CHARM recruits have to do? The study explains, and, as you will see, they faced an even more strict regime that has existed in civilian life in most places.
All recruits wore double-layered cloth masks at all times indoors and outdoors, except when sleeping or eating; practiced social distancing of at least 6 feet; were not allowed to leave campus; did not have access to personal electronics and other items that might contribute to surface transmission; and routinely washed their hands. They slept in double-occupancy rooms with sinks, ate in shared dining facilities, and used shared bathrooms. All recruits cleaned their rooms daily, sanitized bathrooms after each use with bleach wipes, and ate pre-plated meals in a dining hall that was cleaned with bleach after each platoon had eaten.
Most instruction and exercises were conducted outdoors. All movement of recruits was supervised, and unidirectional flow was implemented, with designated building entry and exit points to minimize contact among persons. All recruits, regardless of participation in the study, underwent daily temperature and symptom screening. 6 instructors who were assigned to each platoon worked in 8-hour shifts and enforced the quarantine measures.
If recruits reported any signs or symptoms consistent with Covid-19, they reported to sick call, underwent rapid qPCR testing for SARS-CoV-2, and were placed in isolation pending the results of testing.
Instructors were also restricted to campus, were required to wear masks, were provided with pre-plated meals, and underwent daily temperature checks and symptom screening.
Instructors who were assigned to a platoon in which a positive case was diagnosed underwent rapid qPCR testing for SARS-CoV-2, and, if the result was positive, the instructor was removed from duty.
Recruits and instructors were prohibited from interacting with campus support staff, such as janitorial and food-service personnel. After each class completed quarantine, a deep bleach cleaning of surfaces was performed in the bathrooms, showers, bedrooms, and hallways in the dormitories, and the dormitory remained unoccupied for at least 72 hours before re-occupancy.
This is an environment where those in charge do not mess around. There was surely close to 100% compliance, as compared with, for example, a typical college campus.
What were the results? Incredibly, 2% of the CHARM recruits still contracted the virus, even if all but one remained asymptomatic.
“Our study showed that in a group of predominantly young male military recruits, approximately 2% became positive for SARS-CoV-2, as determined by qPCR assay, during a 2-week, strictly enforced quarantine.”
And how does this compare to the control group that was not subjected to the strict regime?
The non-participants actually contracted the virus at a slightly lower rate than those who were under an extreme regime. Conversely, extreme enforcement of NPIs was associated with a greater degree of infection.
No national media outlet has covered this story correctly – the most important finding of all has been omitted and that is that extreme quarantine among military recruits did absolutely nothing to stop the virus compared with a non-quarantine group.
Here are four actual media headlines about the study that miss this point entirely:
CNN: “Many military Covid-19 cases are asymptomatic, studies show”
SciTech Daily: “Asymptomatic COVID-19 Transmission Revealed Through Study of 2,000 Marine Recruits”
ABC: “Broad study of Marine recruits shows limits of COVID-19 symptom screening”
US Navy: “Navy/Marine Corps COVID-19 Study Findings Published in New England Journal of Medicine”
This study is important because of the social structure of control here. It’s one thing to observe no effects from national lockdowns. But with this Marine study, you have a near homogeneous group based on age, health, and densities of living. And even here, you see confirmed what so many other studies have shown: lockdowns are pointlessly destructive. They do not manage the disease. They crush human liberty and produce astonishing costs, such as 5.53 million years of lost life from the closing of schools alone.
The lockdowners keep telling us to pay attention to science. Well let’s start doing that, shall we?
When the results contradict their pro-compulsion narrative, they pretend that the studies do not exist and barrel ahead with their scary plans to disable all social functioning in the presence of a virus.
Lockdowns are not science. They never have been. They are an experiment in social/political top-down management and control that is without precedent in cost to life and liberty.
Analysis
As with everything surrounding the “Covid-19” narrative coming from what I term the “political scientists” and politicians does not add up it never has for me and for so many others who choose to seek more information and choose not to blindly follow the programming emanating from our TV screens and radios.
From masks to lockdown to vaccines I have investigated them all and that research has led me to take my own path and make my own choices for myself and my family. I have always been of the firm belief that healthcare decisions should ultimately lie in our own hands and not that of the state and from the conclusion of this study there is clear validation for the path I have chosen.
The million dollar question that MUST now be asked is who will stop this madness and when?


politicalite--2020-11-17--CORB COME BACK: Jeremy Corbyn BACK in Labour Following Anti-Semitism Row

FORMER Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn was back in Labour tonight after being re-instated following a row over anti-Semitism .
The loony leftie will be readmitted to Labour just weeks after he was suspended for saying the scale of anti-Semitism in the party was “ dramatically overstated ” , Politicalite has learnt .
A source close to the former opposition leader said Mr Corbyn would be readmitted though has not yet been formally told , following a meeting of the disputes panel of the party ’ s ruling National Executive Committee .
Mr Corbyn had the whip withdrawn and was suspended @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a damning Equality and Human Rights Commission which found that the party had broken the law in its handling of anti-Semitism complaints .
He had claimed that while “ one anti-Semite is one too many ” the “ scale of the problem was also dramatically overstated for political reasons by our opponents inside and outside the party , as well as by much of the media ” .
His suspension came after his successor as Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer said that people who believed it was “ exaggerated , or a factional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ problem ” and “ should be nowhere near the Labour Party either ” .
But Mr Corbyn acknowledged ahead of a meeting of the disputes committee on Tuesday that concerns around anti-Semitism in Labour were not “ exaggerated ” .
He revealed he had given a statement to the party in an attempt to “ clear up any confusion ” over his initial response and a broadcast interview given in the wake of the report .
In a statement aimed at clarifying his comments , Mr Corbyn had said : “ We must @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it .
And that was not my intention in anything I said this week .
“ I regret the pain this issue has caused the Jewish community and would wish to do nothing that would exacerbate or prolong it .
“ To be clear , concerns about anti-Semitism are neither ‘ exaggerated ’ nor ‘ overstated ’ .
“ The point I wished to make was that the vast majority of Labour Party members were and remain committed anti-racists deeply opposed to anti-Semitism .
”

FORMER Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn was back in Labour tonight after being re-instated following a row over anti-Semitism.
The loony leftie will be readmitted to Labour just weeks after he was suspended for saying the scale of anti-Semitism in the party was “dramatically overstated”, Politicalite has learnt.
A source close to the former opposition leader said Mr Corbyn would be readmitted though has not yet been formally told, following a meeting of the disputes panel of the party’s ruling National Executive Committee.
Mr Corbyn had the whip withdrawn and was suspended from the party over his response to a damning Equality and Human Rights Commission which found that the party had broken the law in its handling of anti-Semitism complaints.
He had claimed that while “one anti-Semite is one too many” the “scale of the problem was also dramatically overstated for political reasons by our opponents inside and outside the party, as well as by much of the media”.
His suspension came after his successor as Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer said that people who believed it was “exaggerated, or a factional attack” were “part of the problem” and “should be nowhere near the Labour Party either”.
But Mr Corbyn acknowledged ahead of a meeting of the disputes committee on Tuesday that concerns around anti-Semitism in Labour were not “exaggerated”.
He revealed he had given a statement to the party in an attempt to “clear up any confusion” over his initial response and a broadcast interview given in the wake of the report.
In a statement aimed at clarifying his comments, Mr Corbyn had said: “We must never tolerate anti-Semitism or belittle concerns about it. And that was not my intention in anything I said this week.
“I regret the pain this issue has caused the Jewish community and would wish to do nothing that would exacerbate or prolong it.
“To be clear, concerns about anti-Semitism are neither ‘exaggerated’ nor ‘overstated’.
“The point I wished to make was that the vast majority of Labour Party members were and remain committed anti-racists deeply opposed to anti-Semitism.”
More follows.


politicalite--2020-11-19--CASTLE CALLING: The Queen May Watch I’m A Celeb! says Ruthie Henshall as NEW Campers Head Into Celeb

CASTLE CALLING: The Queen May Watch I’m A Celeb! says Ruthie Henshall as NEW Campers Head Into Celeb Castle

TWO New Campmates have entered the I ’ m A Celebrity Castle to battle it out in TV ’ s toughest entertainment challenge and The Queen may be watching says new contestant Ruthie Henshall .
This year the show is being filmed at the historic Gwrych Castle , Abergele in North Wales .
Ant & Dec are hosting an adapted version of I ’ m A Celebrity…Get Me Out Of Here !
live every night from the castle .
As on the regular series , viewers will see the celebrities undertake gruelling trials and fun-filled challenges to win food and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of them being crowned , for the first time ever , King or Queen of the Castle .
Last year ’ s highlights included Caitlyn Jenner giving Ant & Dec the silent treatment after a messy Bushtucker Trial , Roman Kemp ’ s celebrity impressions , Andy Whyment and Cliff Parisi ’ s hilarious entrance into the Jungle via Ol ’ Dingo Town and Jacqueline Jossa being crowned Queen of the Jungle .
The ten celebrities in the Castle for the new series are : TV Presenter – Vernon Kay Broadcaster & Journalist– @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – Shane Richie Paralympic Gold Medallist – Hollie Arnold MBE Radio 1 DJ – Jordan North Corrie Icon – Beverley Callard Ballroom Dancer – AJ Pritchard Author & Podcaster – Giovanna Fletcher Olympic Legend – Sir Mo Farah CBE .
Russell may suffer from many fears but English classical singer Russell Watson is feeling excited to be entering the Welsh castle as a late entry after spending almost the entire year not being able to perform on stage .
Like many musicians across the country , he has had to put all his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chance to take part on this year ’ s I ’ m A Celebrity came at the perfect time .
And whilst he is in camp , the singer hopes to dispel a big misconception that tenors are snooty .
“ I think people often view classical singers as being a bit snooty , posh and unapproachable , ” explains Russell .
“ And I think I will 100 per cent dispel that myth very quickly !
“ I am excited about going on this show especially as I have spent most of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would do !
If I am being honest , I thought it would be really difficult .
I wasn ’ t sure how I would be not being on the stage for such a long period of time , but I have actually enjoyed some of the aspects of it – riding my bike , playing the guitar and seeing my family more .
Now I am looking forward to making some new friends on I ’ m a Celebrity.
” Asked what he will do to jazz the camp up as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I am just going to go in and be myself .
I don ’ t know yet whether they will have forged friendships or whether I will walk in there and they will be desperate to hear someone else ’ s stories !
” “ I definitely think I will be the clown in the camp .
And I will sing too as I have to keep my voice operating and working.
” He also promises he will cry .
Says the singer : “ Without question , I am an emotional wreck @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I watched the film , Marley and Me with my kids recently , I still haven ’ t got over it !
There is no question of me not crying and it won ’ t be acting – it is real.
” Yet whilst Russell has been lucky enough to perform in front of a lot of beautiful historical places around the world over the years , it will be the first time he has lived in a castle .
“ I have performed at a few castles but I have never lived @ @ @ @ @ @ @ laughing as he does .
“ And I am definitely one for my creature comforts too .
“ I do like a coffee in the morning !
’ Aside from his creature comforts , he will also miss his family terribly even though he didn ’ t tell his two children he was going on the programme beforehand .
“ It has been hard keeping it a secret from my kids , ” he admits .
“ What will they say when they find out ?
‘ You b***ard !
Why didn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ My wife was very sceptical at first and I think she is still a little bit nervous .
I will miss them lots.
” As for whether he would like to win and it is a resounding yes .
“ Doing this is as far away from my comfort zone as you can possibly get , ” he explains .
“ And if I were to describe myself , I would say I am quite driven .
I will give everything my best Preparing to go into I ’ m A Celebrity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Ruthie Henshall reveals she won ’ t be scared if there are any spooky trials because she has had a prank played on her before by the Royal family .
Laughing , Ruthie – famous for playing the lead roles in hit West End musicals including Chicago – says they played the joke on her when she was staying with them by a loch in Scotland .
Ruthie dated Prince Edward on and off for five years when she was younger and remains good friends with him , even attending his wedding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ She explains : “ I got jumped out on by Charles and Edward when I was having a cook out with them !
They told me there were ghosts in this particular place and when I went to the toilet with a candle – as there was no electricity – they waited for me to come out and then jumped out on me !
I screamed the place down !
I may well have woken Victoria !
They were hilarious.
” Adding she has visited some of the Royal ’ s palaces in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I visited a couple of their castles but this will be a very different kind of castle !
” Does she think the Queen and Prince Edward will be watching her ?
“ I have no idea whether they watch or not , ” she replies .
“ But I am sure they enjoy reality TV as much as the rest of us !
“ I am really looking forward to going in .
I have been doing the same thing , which I adore , for 35 years and now I want @ @ @ @ @ @ @ !
“ I have also got two teenagers and I can ’ t wait to get away from them !
What ’ s worse – living with two teenagers or going in a castle – thank you very much , I will take the castle !
” Explaining her friend and former I ’ m A Celebrity star , John Barrowman , persuaded her to do the programme , the 53-year-old reveals “ John was the one who told me I should go in , ” she adds .
“ And so he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or bad !
” And whilst she can ’ t wait to meet the other contestants , she admits it ’ s going to feel strange being herself rather than a character .
Says Ruthie : “ It is one thing to be yourself with people who know and love you but who are you with people you don ’ t know ?
It ’ s going to be odd as I am so used to being a character.
” The stage actress says she ’ d love to win and as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reveals she won ’ t rule romance out either .
“ It would be lovely to win as then you would feel you had got through it all and risen to every challenge , ” she explains .
“ And whilst it ( romance ) is the last thing I am thinking about , if there was somebody rather lovely and delicious to look at around my age who was single as well , then that would make it all the more lovely !
” As for what her fellow stage stars will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ m A Celebrity and Ruthie admits they will roar with laughter .
“ I think they will fall off their chairs !
” she adds .
“ I don ’ t think it is expected from me .
It will be a huge surprise !
”

16 SHARES Share Tweet
TWO New Campmates have entered the I’m A Celebrity Castle to battle it out in TV’s toughest entertainment challenge and The Queen may be watching says new contestant Ruthie Henshall.
This year the show is being filmed at the historic Gwrych Castle, Abergele in North Wales. Ant & Dec are hosting an adapted version of I’m A Celebrity…Get Me Out Of Here! live every night from the castle.
As on the regular series, viewers will see the celebrities undertake gruelling trials and fun-filled challenges to win food and treats in the lead up to one of them being crowned, for the first time ever, King or Queen of the Castle. Last year’s highlights included Caitlyn Jenner giving Ant & Dec the silent treatment after a messy Bushtucker Trial, Roman Kemp’s celebrity impressions, Andy Whyment and Cliff Parisi’s hilarious entrance into the Jungle via Ol’ Dingo Town and Jacqueline Jossa being crowned Queen of the Jungle.
The ten celebrities in the Castle for the new series are: TV Presenter – Vernon Kay Broadcaster & Journalist– Victoria Derbyshire Star of Stage & Screen – Shane Richie Paralympic Gold Medallist – Hollie Arnold MBE Radio 1 DJ – Jordan North Corrie Icon – Beverley Callard Ballroom Dancer – AJ Pritchard Author & Podcaster – Giovanna Fletcher Olympic Legend – Sir Mo Farah CBE.
RUSSELL WATSON
Russell may suffer from many fears but English classical singer Russell Watson is feeling excited to be entering the Welsh castle as a late entry after spending almost the entire year not being able to perform on stage. Like many musicians across the country, he has had to put all his touring plans on hold and so the chance to take part on this year’s I’m A Celebrity came at the perfect time.
And whilst he is in camp, the singer hopes to dispel a big misconception that tenors are snooty. “I think people often view classical singers as being a bit snooty, posh and unapproachable,” explains Russell. “And I think I will 100 per cent dispel that myth very quickly! “I am excited about going on this show especially as I have spent most of the year not doing what I normally would do! If I am being honest, I thought it would be really difficult. I wasn’t sure how I would be not being on the stage for such a long period of time, but I have actually enjoyed some of the aspects of it – riding my bike, playing the guitar and seeing my family more. Now I am looking forward to making some new friends on I’m a Celebrity.”
Asked what he will do to jazz the camp up as a late arrival and Russell replies: “I am just going to go in and be myself. I don’t know yet whether they will have forged friendships or whether I will walk in there and they will be desperate to hear someone else’s stories!”
“I definitely think I will be the clown in the camp. And I will sing too as I have to keep my voice operating and working.” He also promises he will cry. Says the singer: “Without question, I am an emotional wreck at the best of the times. I watched the film, Marley and Me with my kids recently, I still haven’t got over it! There is no question of me not crying and it won’t be acting – it is real.” Yet whilst Russell has been lucky enough to perform in front of a lot of beautiful historical places around the world over the years, it will be the first time he has lived in a castle.
“I have performed at a few castles but I have never lived in one,” he says, laughing as he does. “And I am definitely one for my creature comforts too.
“I do like a coffee in the morning!’ Aside from his creature comforts, he will also miss his family terribly even though he didn’t tell his two children he was going on the programme beforehand. “It has been hard keeping it a secret from my kids,” he admits. “What will they say when they find out? ‘You b***ard! Why didn’t you tell us!’” “My wife was very sceptical at first and I think she is still a little bit nervous. I will miss them lots.” As for whether he would like to win and it is a resounding yes. “Doing this is as far away from my comfort zone as you can possibly get,” he explains. “And if I were to describe myself, I would say I am quite driven. I will give everything my best
RUTHIE HENSHALL
Preparing to go into I’m A Celebrity’s Castle, Olivier award winning, Ruthie Henshall reveals she won’t be scared if there are any spooky trials because she has had a prank played on her before by the Royal family.
Laughing, Ruthie – famous for playing the lead roles in hit West End musicals including Chicago – says they played the joke on her when she was staying with them by a loch in Scotland. Ruthie dated Prince Edward on and off for five years when she was younger and remains good friends with him, even attending his wedding to Sophie, Countess of Wessex.
She explains: “I got jumped out on by Charles and Edward when I was having a cook out with them! They told me there were ghosts in this particular place and when I went to the toilet with a candle – as there was no electricity – they waited for me to come out and then jumped out on me! I screamed the place down! I may well have woken Victoria! They were hilarious.” Adding she has visited some of the Royal’s palaces in the past, she says: “I visited a couple of their castles but this will be a very different kind of castle!”
Does she think the Queen and Prince Edward will be watching her? “I have no idea whether they watch or not,” she replies. “But I am sure they enjoy reality TV as much as the rest of us! “I am really looking forward to going in.
I have been doing the same thing, which I adore, for 35 years and now I want to shake my life up a bit! “I have also got two teenagers and I can’t wait to get away from them! What’s worse – living with two teenagers or going in a castle – thank you very much, I will take the castle!” Explaining her friend and former I’m A Celebrity star, John Barrowman, persuaded her to do the programme, the 53-year-old reveals “John was the one who told me I should go in,” she adds. “And so he is to blame whether it is good or bad!” And whilst she can’t wait to meet the other contestants, she admits it’s going to feel strange being herself rather than a character. Says Ruthie: “It is one thing to be yourself with people who know and love you but who are you with people you don’t know?
It’s going to be odd as I am so used to being a character.” The stage actress says she’d love to win and as a single mum, she laughs as she reveals she won’t rule romance out either. “It would be lovely to win as then you would feel you had got through it all and risen to every challenge,” she explains. “And whilst it (romance) is the last thing I am thinking about, if there was somebody rather lovely and delicious to look at around my age who was single as well, then that would make it all the more lovely!”
As for what her fellow stage stars will think when she goes on I’m A Celebrity and Ruthie admits they will roar with laughter. “I think they will fall off their chairs!” she adds. “I don’t think it is expected from me. It will be a huge surprise!”
I’m A Celeb airs Nightly on ITV at 9pm


politicalite--2020-11-19--OUT-FOXED: Newsmax Smashes Records As Pro-Trumpers Abandon Fox News

FOX News is losing thousands viewers to US Network Newsmax following Murdoch ’ s drop off support for Trump .
One Newsmax television personality Grant Stinchfield is puffing out his chest.
” They don ’ t know what to do with all of us , ” Stinchfield said on the air Monday night .
“ We ’ re killing it here on Newsmax with a tactic they ’ ve never tried .
It ’ s called the truth , the stone-cold truth , and once you get a taste of it , you will never tolerate being lied to again.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ it lasts , has been astonishingly swift and could foreshadow significant competition to Fox News Channel´s dominance with conservative viewers in two decades .
“ We´ve really cornered Fox from the right , ” said Chris Ruddy , Newsmax founder and friend of Trump .
“ They´ve never had that.
” From the beginning of July to the week before Election Day , Newsmax averaged 58,000 viewers from 7 to 10 p.m. on weekdays .
That jumped to 568,000 the week after the election , the Nielsen company said .
In the same @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to 450,000 .
For the same dates , Fox News averaged 3.6 million viewers in the evening , Nielsen said .
Fox´s prime-time viewership during the two weeks after the election was up 50 percent over last year .
“ We love competition .
We have always thrived on competition , ” Fox Corp. CEO Lachlan Murdoch said on an Election Day earnings call .
Ruddy traced much of Newsmax´s increase to Trump supporters angered by Fox´s election night call that Democrat Joe Biden had won Arizona – ahead of any other news @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , for the president´s backers it was an ill-timed sign of insufficient loyalty from their favorite network .
Trump , who criticized Fox throughout the campaign , has driven the point home with repeated tweets suggesting his followers check out Newsmax or a smaller rival that also presses a conservative viewpoint , One America News Network .
“ There´s a large part of the country that wants to have a voice , the same people who gave birth to what turned into a very robust Fox News , ” said Michael Clemente , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ former Fox News executive .
“ Now , more than ever , they want to be heard , and have influence equal to their peers on the coasts .
Their loyalty is to that voice and not to any place or another.
” Newsmax says it has an editorial staff of 70 , including those attached to its website , which at midday Wednesday led with stories about Trump´s press secretary calling restrictions on Thanksgiving gatherings “ Orwellian , ” and the president´s latest false tweet claiming an election victory .
The television @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conservative viewers not to be “ out-foxed , ” but it was telling on Monday that both Newsmax and OANN spent considerable time discussing an interview that was conducted on Fox , where a Trump lawyer predicted her client would win by millions of votes .
Programming generally consists of news talk shows , and it´s not difficult to see where the loyalty lies .
“ Donald Trump is the most powerful person in the world , ” said Greg Kelly , a former personality at Fox´s New York affiliate who is Newsmax´s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he´s president , but because he´s loved by so many people.
” When Newsmax´s Chris Salcedo asked a question about Biden during an interview Monday with Trump aide Peter Navarro , he was quickly brushed off .
“ As far as I´m concerned , President Trump is going to have a second term , ” Navarro said .
Newsmax hasn´t declared Biden the president-elect , unlike other news organizations , including Fox and The Associated Press .
They say they are waiting for final certification of the vote before doing so .
Even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump has an extremely narrow chance of overturning the results , he said it´s up to the states , not media organizations , to declare a winner .
When that process is done , Newsmax will accept the winner , he said .
But if Trump ’ s chances of overturning the results are so small , why should a discussion about them dominate Newsmax´s airtime ?
“ I think that people that are not pro-Trump or don´t like him think we should get past it or they are tired of it , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are quite anxious to hear about developments.
” He said he differs from Trump in believing the administration should be cooperating in a transition , even if the president holds out hope that the results could somehow be overturned .
“ I would tell him if I speak to him that I think they should engage in a transition , ” he said .
The spotlight on smaller rivals comes at an extraordinarily tumultuous time at Fox .
There´s always been a tension between the news and opinion sides of the network , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ultimate “ unspinnable ” story of election results , said Nicole Hemmer , a Columbia University professor and author of “ Messengers of the Right : Conservative Media and the Transformation of American Politics.
” In some respects , the surge in Newsmax´s viewership represents a temper tantrum by some Fox viewers , she said .
For Newsmax , a big question is whether its programming is compelling enough to hold viewers who are clearly sampling .
Besides Kelly , former Trump press secretary Sean Spicer is Newsmax´s best-known personality .
Both their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ruddy said a new prime-time show will start next month and another is in the works .
“ It´s going to be a challenge for ( Newsmax ) to grow their numbers in the way that Fox did because of the lack of a news operation , ” Hemmer said .
FOX News did not respond to requests for comment .

FOX News is losing thousands viewers to US Network Newsmax following Murdoch’s drop off support for Trump.
One Newsmax television personality Grant Stinchfield is puffing out his chest.”They don’t know what to do with all of us,” Stinchfield said on the air Monday night.
“We’re killing it here on Newsmax with a tactic they’ve never tried. It’s called the truth, the stone-cold truth, and once you get a taste of it, you will never tolerate being lied to again.”
Newsmax´s burst, whether or not it lasts, has been astonishingly swift and could foreshadow significant competition to Fox News Channel´s dominance with conservative viewers in two decades.
“We´ve really cornered Fox from the right,” said Chris Ruddy, Newsmax founder and friend of Trump. “They´ve never had that.”
From the beginning of July to the week before Election Day, Newsmax averaged 58,000 viewers from 7 to 10 p.m. on weekdays. That jumped to 568,000 the week after the election, the Nielsen company said. In the same period, daytime viewership increased from 46,000 to 450,000.
For the same dates, Fox News averaged 3.6 million viewers in the evening, Nielsen said. Fox´s prime-time viewership during the two weeks after the election was up 50 percent over last year.
“We love competition. We have always thrived on competition,” Fox Corp. CEO Lachlan Murdoch said on an Election Day earnings call.
Ruddy traced much of Newsmax´s increase to Trump supporters angered by Fox´s election night call that Democrat Joe Biden had won Arizona – ahead of any other news organization. While that call proved correct, for the president´s backers it was an ill-timed sign of insufficient loyalty from their favorite network.
Trump, who criticized Fox throughout the campaign, has driven the point home with repeated tweets suggesting his followers check out Newsmax or a smaller rival that also presses a conservative viewpoint, One America News Network.
“There´s a large part of the country that wants to have a voice, the same people who gave birth to what turned into a very robust Fox News,” said Michael Clemente, Newsmax´s CEO until last April and a former Fox News executive. “Now, more than ever, they want to be heard, and have influence equal to their peers on the coasts. Their loyalty is to that voice and not to any place or another.”
Newsmax says it has an editorial staff of 70, including those attached to its website, which at midday Wednesday led with stories about Trump´s press secretary calling restrictions on Thanksgiving gatherings “Orwellian,” and the president´s latest false tweet claiming an election victory.
The television network is running a clever ad telling conservative viewers not to be “out-foxed,” but it was telling on Monday that both Newsmax and OANN spent considerable time discussing an interview that was conducted on Fox, where a Trump lawyer predicted her client would win by millions of votes.
Programming generally consists of news talk shows, and it´s not difficult to see where the loyalty lies.
“Donald Trump is the most powerful person in the world,” said Greg Kelly, a former personality at Fox´s New York affiliate who is Newsmax´s most polished broadcaster. “Not because he´s president, but because he´s loved by so many people.”
When Newsmax´s Chris Salcedo asked a question about Biden during an interview Monday with Trump aide Peter Navarro, he was quickly brushed off.
“As far as I´m concerned, President Trump is going to have a second term,” Navarro said.
Newsmax hasn´t declared Biden the president-elect, unlike other news organizations, including Fox and The Associated Press. They say they are waiting for final certification of the vote before doing so.
Even though Ruddy conceded in an interview that Trump has an extremely narrow chance of overturning the results, he said it´s up to the states, not media organizations, to declare a winner. When that process is done, Newsmax will accept the winner, he said.
But if Trump’s chances of overturning the results are so small, why should a discussion about them dominate Newsmax´s airtime?
“I think that people that are not pro-Trump or don´t like him think we should get past it or they are tired of it,” he said. “But conservatives are quite anxious to hear about developments.”
He said he differs from Trump in believing the administration should be cooperating in a transition, even if the president holds out hope that the results could somehow be overturned.
“I would tell him if I speak to him that I think they should engage in a transition,” he said.
The spotlight on smaller rivals comes at an extraordinarily tumultuous time at Fox. There´s always been a tension between the news and opinion sides of the network, but this time it´s reflected in the ultimate “unspinnable” story of election results, said Nicole Hemmer, a Columbia University professor and author of “Messengers of the Right: Conservative Media and the Transformation of American Politics.”
In some respects, the surge in Newsmax´s viewership represents a temper tantrum by some Fox viewers, she said.
For Newsmax, a big question is whether its programming is compelling enough to hold viewers who are clearly sampling. Besides Kelly, former Trump press secretary Sean Spicer is Newsmax´s best-known personality. Both their shows are aired twice a night; Ruddy said a new prime-time show will start next month and another is in the works.
“It´s going to be a challenge for (Newsmax) to grow their numbers in the way that Fox did because of the lack of a news operation,” Hemmer said.
FOX News did not respond to requests for comment.
Additional Reporting by Associated Press


politicalite--2020-11-20--HE FELT LIKE CHICKEN THAT NIGHT: Accrington Man Who Had SEX with CHICKENS Jailed

A MAN who felt like Chicken one night has been jailed for 30 months after repeatedly molesting farmyard animals .
The father-of-two from Accrington would “ creep into a poultry farm at night to have sex with chickens used to apologise to the animals afterwards.
” the Bolton News reported .
Shane Waters , who has previously been convicted of having sex with a horse and a donkey , admitted in his police interview that he could not control his ‘ urges ’ when it came to sexual intercourse with animals .
Burnley Crown Court also heard that the 40-year-old @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dog , a Great Dane , despite the fact she would bite him while he was doing so .
Prosecuting the case , Barbara Webster said that the defendant had made admissions of his guilt during his police interview and had pleaded guilty at a lower court to having sexual intercourse with a chicken , a dog and burglary .
Webster said : “ After he had reviewed the CCTV he went back in and found 11 dead chickens .
He formed the view that something sexual had happened to them.
” He @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , where he made full and frank admissions from the outset , stating ‘ I need help , I know what you ’ re on about I just get these urges.
’ ” After his arrests for the offences against the chickens , an examination was carried out upon Waters ’ dog , where traces of semen were found .
Ms Webster said : “ In his interview , the defendant admitted going onto the farm intending having sex with the chickens .
“ He admitted he had been on the farm on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would say sorry to the chickens when he was finished .
“ He also admitted to having sexual intercourse with his Great Dane at his address .
He admitted that when he had sex with her .
He said he knew she didn ’ t like it and would growl and bite him.
” Defending his client , Anna Chesnut said Waters , of Elizabeth Street , Accrington , was deeply ashamed of his actions .
She said : “ There is nothing that I can offer on his behalf by way of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ apologetic .
He appreciates the full force of his suffering that he has caused to animals .
“ Before he was remanded into custody there was an order in place that would allow him to see his children every Sunday .
He misses them desperately as a result of being in prison and wants to be a good father to them and continue to see them .
“ You will be aware that he does not have diagnosed mental health issues , but he feels there may be some undiagnosed traumatic events that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wants to explore with his GP what sort of support may be available to him in the community.
” He was this morning sentenced to 30 months in prison for his crime .

123 SHARES Share Tweet
A MAN who felt like Chicken one night has been jailed for 30 months after repeatedly molesting farmyard animals.
The father-of-two from Accrington would “creep into a poultry farm at night to have sex with chickens used to apologise to the animals afterwards.” the Bolton News reported.
Shane Waters, who has previously been convicted of having sex with a horse and a donkey, admitted in his police interview that he could not control his ‘urges’ when it came to sexual intercourse with animals.
Burnley Crown Court also heard that the 40-year-old admitted to having sex with his own dog, a Great Dane, despite the fact she would bite him while he was doing so.
Prosecuting the case, Barbara Webster said that the defendant had made admissions of his guilt during his police interview and had pleaded guilty at a lower court to having sexual intercourse with a chicken, a dog and burglary.
Webster said: “After he had reviewed the CCTV he went back in and found 11 dead chickens. He formed the view that something sexual had happened to them.”
He was later identified and visited by police, where he made full and frank admissions from the outset, stating ‘I need help, I know what you’re on about I just get these urges.’”
After his arrests for the offences against the chickens, an examination was carried out upon Waters’ dog, where traces of semen were found.
Ms Webster said: “In his interview, the defendant admitted going onto the farm intending having sex with the chickens.
“He admitted he had been on the farm on nine previous occasions and told officers he would say sorry to the chickens when he was finished.
“He also admitted to having sexual intercourse with his Great Dane at his address. He admitted that when he had sex with her. He said he knew she didn’t like it and would growl and bite him.”
Defending his client, Anna Chesnut said Waters, of Elizabeth Street, Accrington, was deeply ashamed of his actions.
She said: “There is nothing that I can offer on his behalf by way of excuse, he is genuinely ashamed and apologetic. He appreciates the full force of his suffering that he has caused to animals.
“Before he was remanded into custody there was an order in place that would allow him to see his children every Sunday. He misses them desperately as a result of being in prison and wants to be a good father to them and continue to see them.
“You will be aware that he does not have diagnosed mental health issues, but he feels there may be some undiagnosed traumatic events that he needs to explore.”
“He wants to explore with his GP what sort of support may be available to him in the community.”
He was this morning sentenced to 30 months in prison for his crime.
Additional Reporting by The Bolton News


politicalite--2020-11-20--DIANA AWARD: William Praises Ambassadors For Work Combating Cyber Bulling

THE DUKE of Cambridge has praised the efforts of young people battling online bullying with a charity promoting the legacy of his mother Diana , Princess of Wales .
William said it was “ heartbreaking ” to hear how abuse over the internet had affected the lives of the teenage ambassadors from The Diana Award , when he spoke to the group to mark Anti-Bullying Week .
The Diana Award , set up in memory of the princess and her belief that young people have the power to change the world , has trained more than 35,000 young people as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ schools and communities .
The duke surprised the young ambassadors by making an unannounced appearance on a video call to show his admiration for their work .
William said : “ It ’ s just horrible and it ’ s very moving to hear you guys talk about how you want to help others and make sure that doesn ’ t happen to anyone else .
“ That is the most important thing , that you realise this isn ’ t going to beat you and you want to make sure that others @ @ @ @ @ @ @ same torment that you guys have gone through .
“ But I ’ m just so sorry that you ’ ve experienced these circumstances and these bullies .
It ’ s heartbreaking to hear how much of an impact it ’ s had on your schooling , your life , and things like that .
“ Clearly you guys have all taken this on and beaten it , which is fantastic .
Because it can – and , sadly it does – get on top of too many people and some of them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Despite schools being closed for a large part of this year due to Covid-19 , the charity ’ s anti-bullying ambassadors said abuse had just increasingly transferred online .
Rose Agnew , 14 , from Warwick , Jude Bedford , 16 , from Cambridge , Paige Keen , 14 , from Norwich , and Isabel Broderick , 15 , from the West Midlands , shared their experiences with the duke .
They were invited to join a video conversation on Thursday but had no idea it would be with the future king .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Rose screamed in delight .
Laughing , William responded : “ Well at least one of you recognised me .
The other three are not quite sure… ” Isabel told him she had suffered social anxiety after being targeted by an anonymous online account that threatened to reveal fabricated personal and sensitive information about her at the end of Year 8 .
She never found out who was responsible and it took her two years to even tell her mother .
William said : “ That ’ s a lot for you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that anxiety , that pressure .
That ’ s horrible for you to have to live with that for so long.
” Paige was targeted by a group of boys who edited her online photos and called her “ fat ” or “ ugly ” , while Jude told of becoming fed up at being picked on .
Rose , who has been targeted by racism and other types of bullying and saw her school work badly affected , told William why she had become an ambassador .
“ I joined the Diana @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it ’ s like to be bullied and that ’ s a feeling that I want to try and prevent as many people from having as possible , ” she said .
“ When people hate you for a factor that you can ’ t control and that you can ’ t change , it just makes you feel so powerless.
” She told the duke there should be anti-bullying ambassadors in every school and having a peer-to-peer mentor when she was being targeted would have had a profound impact on her life @ @ @ @ @ @ @ got worse due to lockdown and with everyone spending so much more time on video calls and social media before schools returned in September , Rose suggested it was worse when people were no longer face-to-face .
“ What was being said generally when people were being bullied was a lot worse , as it had moved online , since our whole life had moved online and bullying went with it , ” she said .

THE DUKE of Cambridge has praised the efforts of young people battling online bullying with a charity promoting the legacy of his mother Diana, Princess of Wales.
William said it was “heartbreaking” to hear how abuse over the internet had affected the lives of the teenage ambassadors from The Diana Award, when he spoke to the group to mark Anti-Bullying Week.
The Diana Award, set up in memory of the princess and her belief that young people have the power to change the world, has trained more than 35,000 young people as anti-bullying ambassadors working to help victims in schools and communities.
The duke surprised the young ambassadors by making an unannounced appearance on a video call to show his admiration for their work.
William said: “It’s just horrible and it’s very moving to hear you guys talk about how you want to help others and make sure that doesn’t happen to anyone else.
“That is the most important thing, that you realise this isn’t going to beat you and you want to make sure that others are not going to go through the same torment that you guys have gone through.
“But I’m just so sorry that you’ve experienced these circumstances and these bullies. It’s heartbreaking to hear how much of an impact it’s had on your schooling, your life, and things like that.
“Clearly you guys have all taken this on and beaten it, which is fantastic. Because it can – and, sadly it does – get on top of too many people and some of them can’t come through it.”
Despite schools being closed for a large part of this year due to Covid-19, the charity’s anti-bullying ambassadors said abuse had just increasingly transferred online.
Rose Agnew, 14, from Warwick, Jude Bedford, 16, from Cambridge, Paige Keen, 14, from Norwich, and Isabel Broderick, 15, from the West Midlands, shared their experiences with the duke.
They were invited to join a video conversation on Thursday but had no idea it would be with the future king. “No way, no way,” Rose screamed in delight.
Laughing, William responded: “Well at least one of you recognised me. The other three are not quite sure…”
Isabel told him she had suffered social anxiety after being targeted by an anonymous online account that threatened to reveal fabricated personal and sensitive information about her at the end of Year 8.
She never found out who was responsible and it took her two years to even tell her mother.
William said: “That’s a lot for you to live with, that stress, that anxiety, that pressure. That’s horrible for you to have to live with that for so long.”
Paige was targeted by a group of boys who edited her online photos and called her “fat” or “ugly”, while Jude told of becoming fed up at being picked on.
Rose, who has been targeted by racism and other types of bullying and saw her school work badly affected, told William why she had become an ambassador.
“I joined the Diana Award and applied because I know what it’s like to be bullied and that’s a feeling that I want to try and prevent as many people from having as possible,” she said.
“When people hate you for a factor that you can’t control and that you can’t change, it just makes you feel so powerless.”
She told the duke there should be anti-bullying ambassadors in every school and having a peer-to-peer mentor when she was being targeted would have had a profound impact on her life.
When William asked if bullying had got worse due to lockdown and with everyone spending so much more time on video calls and social media before schools returned in September, Rose suggested it was worse when people were no longer face-to-face.
“What was being said generally when people were being bullied was a lot worse, as it had moved online, since our whole life had moved online and bullying went with it,” she said.
Additional Reporting by PA Media


politicalite--2020-11-20--PERVY PONTIFF: Pope Francis ‘Liked’ Insta Post Of ‘Scantily Clad’ Model

THE VATICAN is investigating how Pope Francis ’ s official Instagram account ‘ liked ’ a photo of a scantily-clad @ @ @ @ @ official said that the ‘ like ’ didn ’ t originate from the Holy See @ @ @ @ @ the Vatican was working “ in close connection ” with Instagram to get to the @ @ @ @ @ photo .
Francis ’ s official Instagram account @ franciscus has 7.4 million followers but @ @ @ @ @ .
Earlier this month , it was shown as having ‘ liked ’ a photo @ @ @ @ @ Brazilian model whose Instagram account features dozens of photos of her in thong bikinis and @ @ @ @ @ photo liked by his account , she is dressed as an apparent schoolgirl , wearing @ @ @ @ @ white garter stockings leaning up against a school locker .
Francis has a robust social @ @ @ @ @ Twitter account @ Pontifex tweeting out daily prayers in a variety of languages .

THE VATICAN is investigating how Pope Francis’s official Instagram account ‘liked’ a photo of a scantily-clad Brazilian model.
A Vatican official said that the ‘like’ didn’t originate from the Holy See and, as such, the Vatican was working “in close connection” with Instagram to get to the bottom of who liked the photo.
Francis’s official Instagram account @franciscus has 7.4 million followers but doesn’t follow anyone.
Earlier this month, it was shown as having ‘liked’ a photo of Natalia Garibotto, a Brazilian model whose Instagram account features dozens of photos of her in thong bikinis and provocative poses.
In the photo liked by his account, she is dressed as an apparent schoolgirl, wearing a short tartan miniskirt and white garter stockings leaning up against a school locker.
Francis has a robust social media presence, with his Twitter account @Pontifex tweeting out daily prayers in a variety of languages.
Additional Reporting By PA Media


politicalite--2020-11-20--DIANA AWARD: William Praises Ambassadors For Work Combating Cyber Bullying


politicalite--2020-11-21--BENNY JAMES: “This years I’m A Celeb is the ONE to Watch” – The Sunday Lowdown

SO we are coming up to the first week in the I ’ m A Celebrity castle and a lot has happened already , we ’ ve already seen Radio 1 DJ Jordan become a national treasure , Olympic Gold medal-winning Sir Mo Farah getting knockdown by fish guts in a Paul Burrell-esque bush tucker trail , Ruthie sharing all the Royal top shagger gossip that we just want to hear so much more , Then we have seen Vernon Kay ’ s iconic moment taking a shower in the castle looking like buddy the elf it ’ s that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seen a new fans favourite , Kiosk Cledwyn male a appearance who replaces his Australian cousin , Kiosk Kevin , but will he be just as a legend ?
Lot of people was doubting the show before it started as we are used to seeing the celebs taking on challenges in the beautiful sunshine and being made to eat some very exotic stuff while Down Under , but given the change of location , it ’ s expected that there ’ ll be lots of changes to the series .
The producers are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ feel as normal as possible .
Cowles said : “ We are all really excited about a UK version of I ’ m A Celebrity.
” While it will certainly be different producing the show from the UK , the same tone and feel will remain .
” There ’ s one thing that hasn ’ t changed this year and that ’ s Ant and Dec making the show 100 % times better with there iconic banter and laughing at celebs taking part in the bush tucker trails , imagine a world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ each other the country wouldn ’ t be the same haha .
We have some amazing women that have entered the castle trying to take the queen of the jungle crown of last years winner Jacquiline Jossa .
So Here ’ s my top 3 hottest women on the show this year .
No3 so starting us off is Hollie Arnold Paralympic gold medal winner , Hollie has a hugely impressive Paralympic pedigree ans keeping her body in shape – but how shall we cope with the challenges in Wales ?
No2 has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for a old dear aged 53 she ’ s still got it all going for her , let ’ s hope she keeps spilling the gossip about what went down in the palace .
I ’ m A Celebrity 2020 contestant and former EastEnders and girl band star.. Jessica Plummer , who recently departed from Walford Square following her character Chantelle Atkins ’ death.. we wonder if she will provide us with that iconic shower scene that have seen Katie Price , Myleene Klass , Gemma Atkinson all become previously being fan favourites @

57 SHARES Share Tweet
SO we are coming up to the first week in the I’m A Celebrity castle and a lot has happened already, we’ve already seen Radio 1 DJ Jordan become a national treasure, Olympic Gold medal-winning Sir Mo Farah getting knockdown by fish guts in a Paul Burrell-esque bush tucker trail, Ruthie sharing all the Royal top shagger gossip that we just want to hear so much more, Then we have seen Vernon Kay’s iconic moment taking a shower in the castle looking like buddy the elf it’s that small for him.
We have also seen a new fans favourite, Kiosk Cledwyn male a appearance who replaces his Australian cousin, Kiosk Kevin, but will he be just as a legend? Lot of people was doubting the show before it started as we are used to seeing the celebs taking on challenges in the beautiful sunshine and being made to eat some very exotic stuff while Down Under, but given the change of location, it’s expected that there’ll be lots of changes to the series.
The producers are, however, keen to keep the feel as normal as possible. Cowles said: “We are all really excited about a UK version of I’m A Celebrity.”
While it will certainly be different producing the show from the UK, the same tone and feel will remain. ”
There’s one thing that hasn’t changed this year and that’s Ant and Dec making the show 100% times better with there iconic banter and laughing at celebs taking part in the bush tucker trails, imagine a world if Ant and Dec stopped speaking to each other the country wouldn’t be the same haha. We have some amazing women that have entered the castle trying to take the queen of the jungle crown of last years winner Jacquiline Jossa.
BENNY’S HOT THREE
So Here’s my top 3 hottest women on the show this year. No3 so starting us off is Hollie Arnold Paralympic gold medal winner, Hollie has a hugely impressive Paralympic pedigree ans keeping her body in shape – but how shall we cope with the challenges in Wales?
No2 has gotta be Actress Ruthie Henshall, for a old dear aged 53 she’s still got it all going for her, let’s hope she keeps spilling the gossip about what went down in the palace.
No1.. Jessica Plummer.
I’m A Celebrity 2020 contestant and former EastEnders and girl band star.. Jessica Plummer, who recently departed from Walford Square following her character Chantelle Atkins’ death.. we wonder if she will provide us with that iconic shower scene that have seen Katie Price, Myleene Klass, Gemma Atkinson all become previously being fan favourites.