thetruthaboutcancer--2020-03-20--Coronavirus … Panic or Pandemic?

Coronavirus … Panic or Pandemic?

Does anyone remember the words of FDR : “ The only thing we have to fear is fear itself ” ?
I wonder what he ’ d say today in light of the current state of PANIC over the coronavirus… The coronavirus has absolutely dominated the news for the past couple of weeks .
Travel has come to a standstill , states are forcing businesses to close , and some parts of the country are already under quarantine .
Millions of people are out of work and panicked shoppers have left grocery store shelves bare .
Check out the photos @ @ @ @ @ @ @ store yesterday .
This was the bread aisle , but most of the other aisles were also barren .
If you ’ ve been to the grocery store lately , you ’ ve probably seen something similar .
The impact on our social lives and the global economy has been massive , especially in the first few weeks of March .
Major events have been postponed , thousands of businesses have been forced to close , and the stock markets have taken a major blow .
In an attempt to help slow the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have asked people to practice “ social distancing , ” where we avoid group events and contact with one another as best we can .
Several major sport leagues , including the NBA , MLB , NHL , and Champions League have postponed their seasons indefinitely .
The NCAA basketball tournament known as March Madness was originally going to play the games without fans in attendance but has decided to scrap the tournament altogether .
More recently , state and local governments have issued emergency orders banning bars , restaurants , gyms , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ open .
Many of these went into effect at midnight on March 17th , dealing a huge blow to the hospitality industry just before St. Patrick ’ s Day .
In the midst of all that ’ s happening in the world , there is one underlying disease : FEAR .
People are panicking … begging the government to protect and save them .
But here ’ s the question few people seem to be asking… “ Do we have enough data to support the panic ?
” In a recent article by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ medicine , of epidemiology and population health , of biomedical data science , and of statistics at Stanford University ) , he made some good points… Regardless of whether we have enough data or not , it seems like the mention of the “ V ” word is getting more and more frequent .
Make no mistake… a coronavirus VACCINE is coming !
Will it be “ mandatory ” ?
Will anyone who refuses the vaccine be ostracized from society or be prohibited from traveling ?
In a LA Times article from March @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Edward Jenner , crediting him with “ saving the most lives ever ” with the smallpox vaccine .
Then they claim that the anti-vaxxers have “ forgotten ” about how successful the smallpox vaccine was .
According to the article : Please allow me to retort to this wildly inaccurate article… Vaccinations became mandatory in England in 1853 , and by 1857 , fines and imprisonment awaited people who refused to be vaccinated against smallpox .
And as Dr. Humphries just mentioned , once smallpox vaccination became mandatory in England , massive epidemics @ @ @ @ @ @ @ figures of the Register General of England , between 1857 and 1859 , there were over 14,000 deaths from smallpox .
Then , between 1863 and 1865 , there were over 20,000 smallpox deaths .
A few years later , there were almost 45,000 smallpox deaths between 1870 and 1872 .
Let ’ s just say that based on those death statistics , the smallpox vaccine was far from “ overwhelmingly successful ” as the article claims .
I ’ d call that an abysmal failure !
According to Dr. Suzanne Humphries ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) an interesting phenomenon occurred in a city called Leicester in England , which saw a massive outbreak of smallpox in 1871 , despite an almost 100 % vaccination rate .
Over the next 15 years , the smallpox vaccine was mandatory and they continued to have outbreaks .
However , on March 23 , 1885 , what became known as the “ Great Demonstration ” against mandatory vaccination took place in Leicester .
The residents of Leicester were fed up and held a rally with over 80,000 people participating .
They protested @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of choice .
Over the next eight years , the vaccination rate went from approximately 95 % to only 5 % .
During that period , if someone had smallpox , everyone in the “ infected ” house was placed in strict quarantine and the house thoroughly disinfected .
And guess what happened !
The death rates drastically decreased and there were no more outbreaks !
So the lessons we can learn from Leicester and smallpox is that the vaccine did NOT work , but actually CAUSED further outbreaks .
Whereas quarantine and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of disease .
And while quarantine and isolation are good ideas , what about FORCED quarantine and isolation ?
Could that be considered “ Medical Martial Law ” ?
More on that in a moment… There are lots of promising , natural treatments available to help combat the virus , but nearly all global effort and funding has been dedicated to the development of a vaccine .
In 2015 , a patent was filed by The Pirbright Institute for the live , attenuated coronavirus .
The application claims that the new virus could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ treating or preventing respiratory viruses .
The patent was awarded in 2018 .
Now , The Pirbright Institute is funded by the UK Department for Environment , Food , and Rural Affairs , the WHO , and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation .
All of these entities have been loud supporters of mandatory vaccinations and more government control based on “ health concerns.
” And for several years , Bill Gates has been telling us that a pandemic is coming , and in November of 2019 , collaborating with the World Economic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Foundation hosted “ Event 201 ” where they ran a simulation of a coronavirus pandemic .
But the push for the vaccine has even the staunchest vaccine advocates and scientists worried .
“ I understand the importance of accelerating timelines for vaccines in general , but from everything I know , this is not the vaccine to be doing it with , ” Dr Peter Hotez , dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine , told Reuters .
Hotez worked on development of a vaccine for SARS @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the coronavirus behind a major 2003 outbreak , and found that some vaccinated animals developed more severe disease compared with unvaccinated animals when they were exposed to the virus .
“ There is a risk of immune enhancement , ” said Hotez .
“ The way you reduce that risk is first you show it does not occur in laboratory animals.
” The researchers at Pitt are even considering attaching the coronavirus to a genetically modified measles vaccine .
Ummm….yeah… .
that sounds like a “ great idea.
” ( sarcasm intended ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ available for at least a year , so in the meantime , we ’ re hearing some bizarre recommendations … like … .
We ’ re hearing the “ doctors ” on TV and major newspapers ( like the New York Times ) recommending that you should get a FLU vaccine to protect against Coronavirus .
But a 2017-2018 study published in the prestigious journal “ Vaccine ” ( a peer-reviewed medical journal ) revealed the following : In other words , the flu shot increases your risk of contracting coronavirus by 36 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ A recent article in Bloomberg ( titled “ 99 % of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness ” ) illustrates an overlooked variable in the “ corona-panic ” equation .
And that variable would be the status of the immune system in those who are exposed .
The study found the following : The Bloomberg article also pointed out that the primary threat is to the elderly ( the average age of someone who died was 79.5 ) and that the fatality rate may have been significantly overblown .
Rather than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , in fact , be closer to the global average of about 2 % .
This new report challenges much of the global reporting on the topic which presents a unilateral narrative that simply being exposed ( within six feet ) to someone who may have tested positive for the virus is life-threatening , independent of one ’ s health status and other precautions one might take , such as supporting one ’ s immune system .
Elderly people , already taking multiple prescription drugs for chronic diseases , are highly susceptible to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the adverse effects of pharmaceuticals , and subsequently weakened immune systems .
Below is a table indicating the COVID-19 fatality rate by age .
As is evident , those who are younger than 60 years old have less than 1 % chance of death if exposed .
What About the PCR Test ?
According to David Crowe ( a Canadian software and telecommunications engineer with a degree in biology who is an expert in global infections such as SARS , Ebola , and flu ) , the coronavirus panic is an irrational @ @ @ @ @ @ @ test called “ polymerase chain reaction ” ( PCR ) .
In his own words : In layman ’ s terms , Mr. Crowe suggests that since the PCR test looks for RNA , there is no proof that it detects a virus .
Furthermore , there is no proof that the virus causes disease .
He asserts that the data is being interpreted to benefit the viral theory , and there is zero concern for false positive results .
He concludes that medical papers are propaganda to increase panic .
Mr. Crowe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a shocking new Chinese scientific paper that calculated the false positive rate for asymptomatic patients as … ( wait for it ) … 80 % !
!
And here ’ s a scientific study published less than 2 weeks ago which shows just under 50 % false positives !
So , is this really a pandemic , or are people panicking based on a test which is producing anywhere from 50 % to 80 % false positives ?
In times of crisis , it ’ s not uncommon for citizens to willingly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of “ safety ” and “ the greater good.
” The coronavirus scare is no exception .
Around the world , tens of millions of people have been placed under quarantine .
Since the outbreak of the virus a few months ago , government officials have exercised unprecedented authority to monitor and detain citizens .
The effort to control media coverage has reached a fevered pitch , and there doesn ’ t seem to be any sign that the nanny state is going anywhere .
The efforts to quarantine those suspected of carrying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ effect on its global transmission .
Nevertheless , millions of people in China and around the world have been put on lock-down .
These people are confined to their homes , ships , or temporary “ quarantine zones ” with no due process .
And although you may expect this kind of authoritarian response in communist China , the west is facing similar detention efforts .
In New York City , thousands of people are currently under quarantine .
Although New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio claims that most of the quarantines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them aren ’ t .
We saw during the measles “ epidemic ” last year that Mayor de Blasio has no problem with violating the freedom of American citizens when he tried to force unvaccinated families to receive their shots .
Although New York Governor tried to assure reporters that there are no plans to quarantine New York City amid the coronavirus outbreak , Mayor de Blasio said in an interview on CNN that “ We ’ re absolutely considering that .
We ’ re going to look at all other options , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sure for the whole country.
” San Francisco has already implemented such a quarantine .
Officials in six San Francisco Bay Area counties issued a sweeping shelter-in-place mandate Monday affecting nearly 7 million people , ordering residents to avoid any unnecessary travel by any method and only leave their homes for food , medicine and exercise .
Today the “ coronavirus-panic ” gives government fuel and cover for its assaults on freedom and poses a question the government does not want to answer : If liberty can be taken away in times of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ; or is it just a license , via a temporary government permission slip , subject to the whims of politicians in power ?
The government has no authority to dictate how many people choose to congregate for any peaceful purpose .
Telling people to not attend church is a violation of the constitutional clause , “ prohibiting the free exercise thereof.
” Telling people they can not gather in groups of more than 20 or 30 ( or whatever arbitrary number ) is a clear violation of the constitutional clause , “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
.
the right of the people peaceably to assemble.
” The coronavirus or any other “ emergency ” does NOT cancel or negate the Constitution and Bill of Rights .
We have far more to fear from “ Big Government ” tyranny than we do from any virus .
Moreover , liberty is natural and personal .
You can sacrifice yours , but you can not sacrifice mine .
There are natural ways to fight off viral infections and keep your immune system healthy , one of which is vitamin C , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against COVID-19 coronavirus and has been officially recommended by the Shanghai government .
The coronavirus can be dramatically slowed , or stopped , with the immediate widespread use of high doses of vitamin C. Physicians have demonstrated the powerful antiviral action of vitamin C for decades .
There has been a lack of media coverage of this effective and successful approach against viruses in general , and coronavirus in particular .
Is vitamin C a “ cure ” for coronavirus ?
The reality is that there is no “ cure ” for coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) .
We are exposed to literally thousands of ‘ harmful ’ viruses each and every day , but with a functioning immune system and intake of natural antivirals , we shouldn ’ t have to worry about any of the viruses … including coronavirus !
That ’ s why we are taking PuraThrive Liposomal Vitamin C each and every day .
Why liposomal ?
Because it is the only route of administration that ’ s as “ bioavailable ” ( absorbable ) as IV injections , and it ’ s much cheaper @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vitamin C may be an answer ?
Anyone saying that vitamin therapy can stop coronavirus is already being labeled as “ promoting false information ” and promulgating “ fake news.
” Even the sharing of verifiable news , and direct quotes from credentialed medical professionals , is being restricted or blocked on social media .
Another supplement we take every day is iodine ( specifically Detoxadine , formulated by Dr. Edward Group ) .
Iodine exhibits activity against bacteria , molds , yeasts , protozoa , and many viruses .
Interestingly , of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ use on humans and animals and upon tissues , only iodine is capable of killing all classes of pathogens ( gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria , mycobacteria , fungi , yeasts , viruses and protozoa ) .
One of the main problems with coronavirus is that it creates a “ cytokine storm , ” which is induced by the activation of NLRP3 inflammasomes .
According to a recent article from Italy , melatonin inhibits the NLRP3 inflammasome , so it may be a truly unique molecule to fight against COVID-19 .
Simply stated , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of coronavirus and may also diminish the chances of developing acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung injury .
Also , silver has been utilized as a medicine since ancient times to treat scores of ailments , including the bubonic plague .
It works by interfering with the enzymes that allow a virus to utilize oxygen thus , in essence , suffocating it so it can not do damage in the body .
Silver nanoparticles have proven to exert antiviral activity against HIV-1 at non-cytotoxic concentrations , but the mechanism underlying their HIV-inhibitory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In this study , silver nanoparticles are evaluated to elucidate their mode of antiviral action against HIV-1 using a panel of different in vitro assays .
Interestingly , a little over 100 years ago , during the infamous Spanish flu epidemic of 1918-19 , it has been estimated that 50 million people died worldwide .
In the USA alone , 550,000 people died , which was approximately 10 % of the people afflicted with the flu .
Homeopathic physicians documented then more than 62,000 patients treated with homeopathy resulting in a mortality @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were sick enough to be hospitalized , conventional medicine had a mortality of 30 % while with 27,000 documented hospitalized cases , homeopathy was reporting a mortality of 1.05 % ( Journal of the American Institute of Homeopathy 1921 ; 13:1028-43 ) .
Remember … when it comes to the coronavirus ( or any other bacteria or virus for that matter ) … PLEASE SHARE THIS ARTICLE WITH YOUR FRIENDS AND FAMILY !
Coronavirus : Detention , the Demise of Freedom , the Perils of 5G & Personal Protection CORONAVIRUS : “ The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Answers !
” Man-Made Coronavirus Kills Hundreds ( Bill Gates has a Vaccine for That ) 20 Million Quarantined as “ Deadly ” Coronavirus Reaches the U.S .

Print this article
TTAC is experiencing heavy censorship on many social media channels since we’ve been targeted by the mainstream media sellouts, social media bullies, and political turncoats. Be sure to get the TRUTH by subscribing to our email list. It’s free.
Does anyone remember the words of FDR: “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself”?
I wonder what he’d say today in light of the current state of PANIC over the coronavirus…
The coronavirus has absolutely dominated the news for the past couple of weeks. Travel has come to a standstill, states are forcing businesses to close, and some parts of the country are already under quarantine. Millions of people are out of work and panicked shoppers have left grocery store shelves bare.
Check out the photos that I took in our local grocery store yesterday. This was the bread aisle, but most of the other aisles were also barren.
If you’ve been to the grocery store lately, you’ve probably seen something similar. The impact on our social lives and the global economy has been massive, especially in the first few weeks of March. Major events have been postponed, thousands of businesses have been forced to close, and the stock markets have taken a major blow.
In an attempt to help slow the spread of the virus, health officials have asked people to practice “social distancing,” where we avoid group events and contact with one another as best we can. Several major sport leagues, including the NBA, MLB, NHL, and Champions League have postponed their seasons indefinitely. The NCAA basketball tournament known as March Madness was originally going to play the games without fans in attendance but has decided to scrap the tournament altogether.
More recently, state and local governments have issued emergency orders banning bars, restaurants, gyms, and other social gathering places from remaining open. Many of these went into effect at midnight on March 17th, dealing a huge blow to the hospitality industry just before St. Patrick’s Day.
In the midst of all that’s happening in the world, there is one underlying disease: FEAR.
People are panicking … begging the government to protect and save them.
But here’s the question few people seem to be asking…
“Do we have enough data to support the panic?”
In a recent article by John P.A. Ioannidis (professor of medicine, of epidemiology and population health, of biomedical data science, and of statistics at Stanford University), he made some good points…
The current coronavirus disease, Covid-19, has been called a once-in-a-century pandemic. But it may also be a once-in-a-century evidence fiasco. … The data collected so far on how many people are infected and how the epidemic is evolving are utterly unreliable. Given the limited testing to date, some deaths and probably the vast majority of infections due to SARS-CoV-2 are being missed. We don’t know if we are failing to capture infections by a factor of three or 300. Three months after the outbreak emerged, most countries, including the U.S., lack the ability to test a large number of people and no countries have reliable data on the prevalence of the virus in a representative random sample of the general population.”
He continued:
In the absence of data, prepare-for-the-worst reasoning leads to extreme measures of social distancing and lockdowns. … If we decide to jump off the cliff, we need some data to inform us about the rationale of such an action and the chances of landing somewhere safe.”
Regardless of whether we have enough data or not, it seems like the mention of the “V” word is getting more and more frequent. Make no mistake… a coronavirus VACCINE is coming! Will it be “mandatory”? Will anyone who refuses the vaccine be ostracized from society or be prohibited from traveling?
In a LA Times article from March 18th, they tell the story of Edward Jenner, crediting him with “saving the most lives ever” with the smallpox vaccine. Then they claim that the anti-vaxxers have “forgotten” about how successful the smallpox vaccine was.
According to the article:
This collective amnesia has allowed for the rise of the anti-vaccine movement, whose irresponsible adherents believe vaccines exist to line the pockets of Big Pharma. They ignore the fact that the smallpox vaccine was so overwhelmingly successful at eradicating the disease that it no longer is routinely given. Are anti-vaxxers ready to start believing in vaccines again?
Please allow me to retort to this wildly inaccurate article…
Vaccinations became mandatory in England in 1853, and by 1857, fines and imprisonment awaited people who refused to be vaccinated against smallpox. And as Dr. Humphries just mentioned, once smallpox vaccination became mandatory in England, massive epidemics began to occur. According to official figures of the Register General of England, between 1857 and 1859, there were over 14,000 deaths from smallpox. Then, between 1863 and 1865, there were over 20,000 smallpox deaths. A few years later, there were almost 45,000 smallpox deaths between 1870 and 1872.
Let’s just say that based on those death statistics, the smallpox vaccine was far from “overwhelmingly successful” as the article claims. I’d call that an abysmal failure!
According to Dr. Suzanne Humphries (in her book “Dissolving Illusions”) an interesting phenomenon occurred in a city called Leicester in England, which saw a massive outbreak of smallpox in 1871, despite an almost 100% vaccination rate. Over the next 15 years, the smallpox vaccine was mandatory and they continued to have outbreaks. However, on March 23, 1885, what became known as the “Great Demonstration” against mandatory vaccination took place in Leicester. The residents of Leicester were fed up and held a rally with over 80,000 people participating. They protested mandatory vaccines and actually won their freedom of choice. Over the next eight years, the vaccination rate went from approximately 95% to only 5%. During that period, if someone had smallpox, everyone in the “infected” house was placed in strict quarantine and the house thoroughly disinfected. And guess what happened! The death rates drastically decreased and there were no more outbreaks!
So the lessons we can learn from Leicester and smallpox is that the vaccine did NOT work, but actually CAUSED further outbreaks. Whereas quarantine and isolation were successful at mitigating the spread of disease.
And while quarantine and isolation are good ideas, what about FORCED quarantine and isolation?
Could that be considered “Medical Martial Law”?
More on that in a moment…
The Coming Coronavirus Vaccine
There are lots of promising, natural treatments available to help combat the virus, but nearly all global effort and funding has been dedicated to the development of a vaccine. In 2015, a patent was filed by The Pirbright Institute for the live, attenuated coronavirus. The application claims that the new virus could be used to create a vaccine for treating or preventing respiratory viruses. The patent was awarded in 2018.
Now, The Pirbright Institute is funded by the UK Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, the WHO, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. All of these entities have been loud supporters of mandatory vaccinations and more government control based on “health concerns.”
And for several years, Bill Gates has been telling us that a pandemic is coming, and in November of 2019, collaborating with the World Economic Forum, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation hosted “Event 201” where they ran a simulation of a coronavirus pandemic.
But the push for the vaccine has even the staunchest vaccine advocates and scientists worried.
“I understand the importance of accelerating timelines for vaccines in general, but from everything I know, this is not the vaccine to be doing it with,” Dr Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, told Reuters.
Hotez worked on development of a vaccine for SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome), the coronavirus behind a major 2003 outbreak, and found that some vaccinated animals developed more severe disease compared with unvaccinated animals when they were exposed to the virus.
“There is a risk of immune enhancement,” said Hotez. “The way you reduce that risk is first you show it does not occur in laboratory animals.”
The researchers at Pitt are even considering attaching the coronavirus to a genetically modified measles vaccine. Ummm….yeah…. that sounds like a “great idea.” (sarcasm intended)
But the vaccine won’t be available for at least a year, so in the meantime, we’re hearing some bizarre recommendations … like ….
“GET A FLU SHOT!”
We’re hearing the “doctors” on TV and major newspapers (like the New York Times) recommending that you should get a FLU vaccine to protect against Coronavirus.
But a 2017-2018 study published in the prestigious journal “Vaccine” (a peer-reviewed medical journal) revealed the following:
Examining non-influenza viruses specifically, the odds of both coronavirus and human metapneumovirus in vaccinated individuals were significantly higher when compared to unvaccinated individuals (OR = 1.36 and 1.51, respectively)”
In other words, the flu shot increases your risk of contracting coronavirus by 36%!
But What About Italy?
A recent article in Bloomberg (titled “99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness”) illustrates an overlooked variable in the “corona-panic” equation. And that variable would be the status of the immune system in those who are exposed.
The study found the following:
More than 99% of Italy’s coronavirus fatalities were people who suffered from previous medical conditions, according to a study by the country’s national health authority.”
Moreover:
The Rome-based institute has examined medical records of about 18% of the country’s coronavirus fatalities, finding that just three victims, or 0.8% of the total, had no previous pathology. Almost half of the victims suffered from at least three prior illnesses and about a fourth had either one or two previous conditions. More than 75% had high blood pressure, about 35% had diabetes and a third suffered from heart disease.”
The Bloomberg article also pointed out that the primary threat is to the elderly (the average age of someone who died was 79.5) and that the fatality rate may have been significantly overblown. Rather than 8%, the fatality rate may, in fact, be closer to the global average of about 2%.
This new report challenges much of the global reporting on the topic which presents a unilateral narrative that simply being exposed (within six feet) to someone who may have tested positive for the virus is life-threatening, independent of one’s health status and other precautions one might take, such as supporting one’s immune system. Elderly people, already taking multiple prescription drugs for chronic diseases, are highly susceptible to opportunistic infections due to their chronic conditions, the adverse effects of pharmaceuticals, and subsequently weakened immune systems.
Below is a table indicating the COVID-19 fatality rate by age.
As is evident, those who are younger than 60 years old have less than 1% chance of death if exposed.
What About the PCR Test?
According to David Crowe (a Canadian software and telecommunications engineer with a degree in biology who is an expert in global infections such as SARS, Ebola, and flu), the coronavirus panic is an irrational panic, based on an unproven RNA test called “polymerase chain reaction” (PCR).
In his own words:
The coronavirus test is based on PCR, a manufacturing technique. When used as a test it does not produce a positive/negative result, but simply the number of cycles required to detect genetic material. The division between positive and negative is an arbitrary number of cycles chosen by the testers. If positive means infected and negative means uninfected, then there are cases of people going from infected to uninfected and back to infected again in a couple of days.
In layman’s terms, Mr. Crowe suggests that since the PCR test looks for RNA, there is no proof that it detects a virus. Furthermore, there is no proof that the virus causes disease. He asserts that the data is being interpreted to benefit the viral theory, and there is zero concern for false positive results. He concludes that medical papers are propaganda to increase panic.
He continues:
The world is suffering from a massive delusion based on the belief that a test for RNA is a test for a deadly new virus, a virus that has emerged from wild bats in China, supported by the western assumption that Chinese people will eat anything that moves. If the virus exists, then it should be possible to purify viral particles. From these particles RNA can be extracted and should match the RNA used in this test. Until this is done it is possible that the RNA comes from another source, which could be the cells of the patient, bacteria, fungi etc. There might be an association with elevated levels of RNA and illness, but that is not proof that the RNA is from a virus. Without purification and characterization of virus particles, it cannot be accepted that an RNA test is proof that a virus is present.
Mr. Crowe mentions “false positives” and there is a shocking new Chinese scientific paper that calculated the false positive rate for asymptomatic patients as … (wait for it) … 80%!!
And here’s a scientific study published less than 2 weeks ago which shows just under 50% false positives!
So, is this really a pandemic, or are people panicking based on a test which is producing anywhere from 50% to 80% false positives?
Medical Martial Law?
In times of crisis, it’s not uncommon for citizens to willingly give up their rights in the name of “safety” and “the greater good.” The coronavirus scare is no exception. Around the world, tens of millions of people have been placed under quarantine.
Since the outbreak of the virus a few months ago, government officials have exercised unprecedented authority to monitor and detain citizens. The effort to control media coverage has reached a fevered pitch, and there doesn’t seem to be any sign that the nanny state is going anywhere.
The efforts to quarantine those suspected of carrying the coronavirus seem to have had little effect on its global transmission. Nevertheless, millions of people in China and around the world have been put on lock-down. These people are confined to their homes, ships, or temporary “quarantine zones” with no due process.
And although you may expect this kind of authoritarian response in communist China, the west is facing similar detention efforts.
In New York City, thousands of people are currently under quarantine. Although New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio claims that most of the quarantines are “voluntary,” many of them aren’t. We saw during the measles “epidemic” last year that Mayor de Blasio has no problem with violating the freedom of American citizens when he tried to force unvaccinated families to receive their shots.
Although New York Governor tried to assure reporters that there are no plans to quarantine New York City amid the coronavirus outbreak, Mayor de Blasio said in an interview on CNN that “We’re absolutely considering that. We’re going to look at all other options, but it could get to that for sure for the whole country.”
San Francisco has already implemented such a quarantine. Officials in six San Francisco Bay Area counties issued a sweeping shelter-in-place mandate Monday affecting nearly 7 million people, ordering residents to avoid any unnecessary travel by any method and only leave their homes for food, medicine and exercise.
“BUT IT’S AN EMERGENCY!”
The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times and under all circumstances.” – Ex parte Milligan, U.S. Supreme Court (1866)
Today the “coronavirus-panic” gives government fuel and cover for its assaults on freedom and poses a question the government does not want to answer: If liberty can be taken away in times of crisis, then is it really liberty; or is it just a license, via a temporary government permission slip, subject to the whims of politicians in power?
The government has no authority to dictate how many people choose to congregate for any peaceful purpose.
Our First Amendment states:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble.
Telling people to not attend church is a violation of the constitutional clause, “prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”
Telling people they cannot gather in groups of more than 20 or 30 (or whatever arbitrary number) is a clear violation of the constitutional clause, “no law . . . prohibiting . . . the right of the people peaceably to assemble.”
The coronavirus or any other “emergency” does NOT cancel or negate the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
We have far more to fear from “Big Government” tyranny than we do from any virus. Moreover, liberty is natural and personal. You can sacrifice yours, but you cannot sacrifice mine.
The Good News!
There are natural ways to fight off viral infections and keep your immune system healthy, one of which is vitamin C, which is currently being used in China against COVID-19 coronavirus and has been officially recommended by the Shanghai government.
The coronavirus can be dramatically slowed, or stopped, with the immediate widespread use of high doses of vitamin C. Physicians have demonstrated the powerful antiviral action of vitamin C for decades. There has been a lack of media coverage of this effective and successful approach against viruses in general, and coronavirus in particular.
Is vitamin C a “cure” for coronavirus? The reality is that there is no “cure” for coronavirus (or any virus for that matter). We are exposed to literally thousands of ‘harmful’ viruses each and every day, but with a functioning immune system and intake of natural antivirals, we shouldn’t have to worry about any of the viruses … including coronavirus!
Want proof that vitamin C may be an answer? Anyone saying that vitamin therapy can stop coronavirus is already being labeled as “promoting false information” and promulgating “fake news.” Even the sharing of verifiable news, and direct quotes from credentialed medical professionals, is being restricted or blocked on social media.
Another supplement we take every day is iodine (specifically Detoxadine, formulated by Dr. Edward Group). Iodine exhibits activity against bacteria, molds, yeasts, protozoa, and many viruses. Interestingly, of all the antiseptic preparations suitable for direct use on humans and animals and upon tissues, only iodine is capable of killing all classes of pathogens (gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, mycobacteria, fungi, yeasts, viruses and protozoa).
According to Dr. David Brownstein:
Iodine is essential to not only fighting off an infection it is necessary for proper immune system functioning. There is no bacteria, virus, parasite or fungus that is known to be resistant to iodine.”
One of the main problems with coronavirus is that it creates a “cytokine storm,” which is induced by the activation of NLRP3 inflammasomes. According to a recent article from Italy, melatonin inhibits the NLRP3 inflammasome, so it may be a truly unique molecule to fight against COVID-19. Simply stated, adequate melatonin levels may reduce the infectiousness of coronavirus and may also diminish the chances of developing acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung injury.
Also, silver has been utilized as a medicine since ancient times to treat scores of ailments, including the bubonic plague. It works by interfering with the enzymes that allow a virus to utilize oxygen thus, in essence, suffocating it so it cannot do damage in the body. Silver nanoparticles have proven to exert antiviral activity against HIV-1 at non-cytotoxic concentrations, but the mechanism underlying their HIV-inhibitory activity has not been not fully elucidated. In this study, silver nanoparticles are evaluated to elucidate their mode of antiviral action against HIV-1 using a panel of different in vitro assays.
Interestingly, a little over 100 years ago, during the infamous Spanish flu epidemic of 1918-19, it has been estimated that 50 million people died worldwide. In the USA alone, 550,000 people died, which was approximately 10% of the people afflicted with the flu. Homeopathic physicians documented then more than 62,000 patients treated with homeopathy resulting in a mortality of 0.7%. For people who were sick enough to be hospitalized, conventional medicine had a mortality of 30% while with 27,000 documented hospitalized cases, homeopathy was reporting a mortality of 1.05% (Journal of the American Institute of Homeopathy 1921; 13:1028-43).
Remember … when it comes to the coronavirus (or any other bacteria or virus for that matter) …
Don’t worry … BE HEALTHY!
PLEASE SHARE THIS ARTICLE WITH YOUR FRIENDS AND FAMILY!
Links to previous articles on coronavirus:
Coronavirus: Detention, the Demise of Freedom, the Perils of 5G & Personal Protection
CORONAVIRUS: “The Good, the Bad, and the Answers!”
Man-Made Coronavirus Kills Hundreds (Bill Gates has a Vaccine for That)
20 Million Quarantined as “Deadly” Coronavirus Reaches the U.S.
National Health Emergency Declared


thetruthaboutcancer--2020-03-19--Cancer Survivor Story: Robert Hyde

Cancer Survivor Story: Robert Hyde

Exactly how should you support a loved one that is a cancer patient ?
Robert Hyde will walk you through exactly how you can help your significant other , child , parent , or friend meet success in their cancer journey with your faithful help .
It isn ’ t about just “ being there ” for them .
It ’ s beyond that .
It ’ s about making them feel like their new , turned-inside-out lifestyle changes are easy and that they aren ’ t going through it alone .
Robert and his son committed to making these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ save his wife , but to improve the health of the family , together .
They went completely vegan together and bonded over caring for Susan .
Watch the full video to learn about all of the supportive steps he took and then come back next week to hear Susan ’ s perspective .
Have you survived a cancer diagnosis and learned to tell about it ?
We hear so many amazing stories from our readers about how they beat cancer using the very techniques they ’ ve learned from The Truth About @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hear YOUR story !
Sharing these stories brings hope to those who have been diagnosed with or are currently dealing with cancer .
So , if you have a personal story to share of your triumph over cancer , please click here and tell us all about it .

Print this article
TTAC is experiencing heavy censorship on many social media channels since we’ve been targeted by the mainstream media sellouts, social media bullies, and political turncoats. Be sure to get the TRUTH by subscribing to our email list. It’s free.
Exactly how should you support a loved one that is a cancer patient? Robert Hyde will walk you through exactly how you can help your significant other, child, parent, or friend meet success in their cancer journey with your faithful help.
It isn’t about just “being there” for them. It’s beyond that. It’s about making them feel like their new, turned-inside-out lifestyle changes are easy and that they aren’t going through it alone. Robert and his son committed to making these big, life-saving changes not just to save his wife, but to improve the health of the family, together. They went completely vegan together and bonded over caring for Susan.
Watch the full video to learn about all of the supportive steps he took and then come back next week to hear Susan’s perspective.
Have you survived a cancer diagnosis and learned to tell about it?
We hear so many amazing stories from our readers about how they beat cancer using the very techniques they’ve learned from The Truth About Cancer… and we’d love to hear YOUR story! Sharing these stories brings hope to those who have been diagnosed with or are currently dealing with cancer. So, if you have a personal story to share of your triumph over cancer, please click here and tell us all about it.


thetruthaboutcancer--2020-03-19--Cancer Survivor Story: Gina Ruffa

Cancer Survivor Story: Gina Ruffa

Gina Ruffa has an extraordinary cancer survivor story to tell you because it ’ s actually not her story , it ’ s her son Anthony ’ s story .
Gina ’ s son was diagnosed with stage 3 Rhabdomyosarcoma at only 2 years old .
Like any parent would naturally be , she was frightened .
So , she and her husband continued to do what any parent would do in their shoes , proceed with standard cancer treatment , which we all know is chemotherapy .
He did go into remission for a year , and unfortunately , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cancer came back and harder than ever .
This time it had escalated to stage four .
Gina and her husband had enough .
They already felt they had put their little son through so much trauma and it didn ’ t work , so they knew they had to try a different way .
The natural way .
They had exhausted every “ standard ” option , and now it was time to go to the end ’ s world with natural alternative cancer treatment options to save their son .
Watch @ @ @ @ @ @ @ full story of how Anthony is healthy and well today .
Have you survived a cancer diagnosis and learned to tell about it ?
We hear so many amazing stories from our readers about how they beat cancer using the very techniques they ’ ve learned from The Truth About Cancer… and we ’ d love to hear YOUR story !
Sharing these stories brings hope to those who have been diagnosed with or are currently dealing with cancer .
So , if you have a personal story to share of your triumph @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tell us all about it .

Print this article
TTAC is experiencing heavy censorship on many social media channels since we’ve been targeted by the mainstream media sellouts, social media bullies, and political turncoats. Be sure to get the TRUTH by subscribing to our email list. It’s free.
Gina Ruffa has an extraordinary cancer survivor story to tell you because it’s actually not her story, it’s her son Anthony’s story. Gina’s son was diagnosed with stage 3 Rhabdomyosarcoma at only 2 years old. Like any parent would naturally be, she was frightened. So, she and her husband continued to do what any parent would do in their shoes, proceed with standard cancer treatment, which we all know is chemotherapy. He did go into remission for a year, and unfortunately, just like most chemotherapy cases, his cancer came back and harder than ever. This time it had escalated to stage four.
Gina and her husband had enough. They already felt they had put their little son through so much trauma and it didn’t work, so they knew they had to try a different way. The natural way. They had exhausted every “standard” option, and now it was time to go to the end’s world with natural alternative cancer treatment options to save their son. Watch the full video to find out their full story of how Anthony is healthy and well today.
Have you survived a cancer diagnosis and learned to tell about it?
We hear so many amazing stories from our readers about how they beat cancer using the very techniques they’ve learned from The Truth About Cancer… and we’d love to hear YOUR story! Sharing these stories brings hope to those who have been diagnosed with or are currently dealing with cancer. So, if you have a personal story to share of your triumph over cancer, please click here and tell us all about it.


thetruthaboutcancer--2020-03-17--The Right to Try Act Is Saving Lives – Part 2...

Video Transcript – The Right to Try Act Is Saving Lives ( Part 2 ) If you missed part 1 , watch it here !
So , any way , what is the mechanism of success for cancer treatment ?
As I mentioned , there are from 40 to 650 abnormal mutated genes in the single cancer case , which are continuously changing and increasing the numbers .
Single genes may have multiple mutations .
The number of possible mutations in cancer is estimated at 30 million .
This is a mind boggling number .
Well , this genes which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ normal genes and form a network from the problem in the body , a software which is instructing the body how to make cancer .
Only in some cases , a simple medication can eradicate these genes and cure the disease because this is such a complex problem .
With antineoplastons , we are able to accomplish this in certain percentage of patients because antineoplastons are working on 100 most common mutated genes .
This is a formidable task , of course , to accomplish , but since our research on antineoplastons was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the other pharmaceutical companies developed a number of different medications , which work on the genes , usually on single genes , about over 130 different medications , which are now prescription medications .
Then , of course , using antineoplastons to discover 100 genes , perhaps adding some other gene-targeted medications , for the genes which are not covered by antineoplastons , can solve the problem .
And that ’ s what we do .
Well , so we have to compare now what is the basis of standard cancer treatment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ treatment of cancer was based on microscopic [ inaudible ] .
In 1845 , prominent doctor , who the future of was [ inaudible ] , introduced the principles of microscopic diagnosis of cancer .
Since then , certainly , there were various microscopic techniques which are much superior , but the bottom line is the same .
Look under microscopes from slides from tumors , determine the name of the cancer treatment , everybody the same , which obviously did not work because everybody ’ s different .
What is the basis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Well , what it means , we have to find out what is causing the problem if you like to solve the problem .
You would like to fix the car , you ’ re not going to call Washington to see and ask , “ Well , my car is not working .
What should I do ?
” They say , “ Well , the standard for fixing the car are these three points .
Try it , okay ?
” It ’ s not going to work , okay ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ causing the problem .
Not a new idea , it was introduced about 2,200 years ago by great philosopher Aristotle , whose father was a prominent doctor .
He was saying , “ Find what is causing the problem and treat the problem.
” Okay , this idea is supported now by some prominent minds in medicine .
One of them is Francis Collins , Dr. Francis Collins is the director of the National Institute of Health and what he was saying six years ago is that in the near future , our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ diagnosis will be good for nothing .
It ’ s not very important if this is breast , lung , or prostate cancer .
What is important is what is causing this , what genes are causing this ?
And then we should treat the genes .
Well , that ’ s what we are doing .
So , this is now called precision cancer treatment because the chances for response are more precisely determined than in the standard treatment .
And what this involvement is ?
Well , the identification of genes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The treatment with gene-targeted medications that selectively kill cancer cells , which contain abnormal genes , and it is only a certain way that treatment of infectious diseases .
When penicillin was introduced as the first antibiotics and then streptomycin , well , what doctors were treating infection of the lung , infection of the kidney , infection of the skin .
But , finally , they got the idea , “ Well , it doesn ’ t work this way .
Let ’ s find out what are the germs which are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right antibiotic.
” And then , they were able to save lives .
Before , people would die from pneumonia and now , it ’ s not so common .
People can live after pneumonia , these successful antibiotics .
The problem is that in the infection , you may have just three types of germs and you use combination of three antibiotics , and the problem is over .
In cancer , you are dealing with from 40 to 650 abnormal genes and this is just the tip of the iceberg because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ So , you really need to cover in your treatment large number of genes .
So , basically , this would not be possible without using antineoplastons .
They cover 100 common cancer genes .
It is possible to find out what are these mutated genes by the tests , which are covered by insurance , and for people in United States , they won ’ t need to pay for it .
And then we can select additional medications , if necessary , together with antineoplastons and lead the treatment to cancer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will work for awhile and the patient will die early to later than without a treatment of sometime sooner .
This is the curative treatment , which can get rid of cancer , and that ’ s what we like to do .
So , we have to realize that cancer is the disease in information processing .
Genetic information is segregated in approximately 23,000 genes .
Genes process information through signaling pathways .
In reality , this is much more complex system , but anyway , we don ’ t have time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like quantum computer , which now is quite popular because , well , the United States now in the competition with China .
Who will first get quantum computers , which will be a million times more proficient than carbon computers ?
But , in our body , we are dealing with quantum computer .
Abnormal genes form very complex signaling network and this is cancer genome , which exists parallel to our normal genome .
This cancer genome needs to be destroyed because , if it ’ s not destroyed , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have a problem in our body , how to make cancer cells .
Surgery , radiation , and chemotherapy are not able to do it .
This is the cyber wall , which needs completely different approach .
It can be conquered by using antineoplastons in combination with gene-targeted therapy and immunotherapy .

Print this article
TTAC is experiencing heavy censorship on many social media channels since we’ve been targeted by the mainstream media sellouts, social media bullies, and political turncoats. Be sure to get the TRUTH by subscribing to our email list. It’s free.
Video Transcript – The Right to Try Act Is Saving Lives (Part 2)
If you missed part 1, watch it here!
So, any way, what is the mechanism of success for cancer treatment? As I mentioned, there are from 40 to 650 abnormal mutated genes in the single cancer case, which are continuously changing and increasing the numbers. Single genes may have multiple mutations. The number of possible mutations in cancer is estimated at 30 million. This is a mind boggling number. Well, this genes which are mutated, they enslave thousands of normal genes and form a network from the problem in the body, a software which is instructing the body how to make cancer. Only in some cases, a simple medication can eradicate these genes and cure the disease because this is such a complex problem.
With antineoplastons, we are able to accomplish this in certain percentage of patients because antineoplastons are working on 100 most common mutated genes. This is a formidable task, of course, to accomplish, but since our research on antineoplastons was proved to be successful in clinical trials, the other pharmaceutical companies developed a number of different medications, which work on the genes, usually on single genes, about over 130 different medications, which are now prescription medications. Then, of course, using antineoplastons to discover 100 genes, perhaps adding some other gene-targeted medications, for the genes which are not covered by antineoplastons, can solve the problem. And that’s what we do.
Well, so we have to compare now what is the basis of standard cancer treatment. For over 170 years, the treatment of cancer was based on microscopic [inaudible]. In 1845, prominent doctor, who the future of was [inaudible], introduced the principles of microscopic diagnosis of cancer. Since then, certainly, there were various microscopic techniques which are much superior, but the bottom line is the same. Look under microscopes from slides from tumors, determine the name of the cancer treatment, everybody the same, which obviously did not work because everybody’s different.
What is the basis of revolutionary change in cancer treatment? Well, what it means, we have to find out what is causing the problem if you like to solve the problem. You would like to fix the car, you’re not going to call Washington to see and ask, “Well, my car is not working. What should I do?” They say, “Well, the standard for fixing the car are these three points. Try it, okay?” It’s not going to work, okay? You need to find out what is causing the problem. Not a new idea, it was introduced about 2,200 years ago by great philosopher Aristotle, whose father was a prominent doctor. He was saying, “Find what is causing the problem and treat the problem.” Okay, this idea is supported now by some prominent minds in medicine. One of them is Francis Collins, Dr. Francis Collins is the director of the National Institute of Health and what he was saying six years ago is that in the near future, our way to diagnose cancer based on pathology diagnosis will be good for nothing. It’s not very important if this is breast, lung, or prostate cancer. What is important is what is causing this, what genes are causing this? And then we should treat the genes.
Well, that’s what we are doing. So, this is now called precision cancer treatment because the chances for response are more precisely determined than in the standard treatment. And what this involvement is? Well, the identification of genes involved in cancer in individual patients. The treatment with gene-targeted medications that selectively kill cancer cells, which contain abnormal genes, and it is only a certain way that treatment of infectious diseases. When penicillin was introduced as the first antibiotics and then streptomycin, well, what doctors were treating infection of the lung, infection of the kidney, infection of the skin. But, finally, they got the idea, “Well, it doesn’t work this way. Let’s find out what are the germs which are causing the infection and then select the right antibiotic.” And then, they were able to save lives. Before, people would die from pneumonia and now, it’s not so common. People can live after pneumonia, these successful antibiotics.
The problem is that in the infection, you may have just three types of germs and you use combination of three antibiotics, and the problem is over. In cancer, you are dealing with from 40 to 650 abnormal genes and this is just the tip of the iceberg because this is even much more complicated. So, you really need to cover in your treatment large number of genes. So, basically, this would not be possible without using antineoplastons. They cover 100 common cancer genes. It is possible to find out what are these mutated genes by the tests, which are covered by insurance, and for people in United States, they won’t need to pay for it. And then we can select additional medications, if necessary, together with antineoplastons and lead the treatment to cancer cure. Not palliative treatment, which will work for awhile and the patient will die early to later than without a treatment of sometime sooner. This is the curative treatment, which can get rid of cancer, and that’s what we like to do.
So, we have to realize that cancer is the disease in information processing. Genetic information is segregated in approximately 23,000 genes. Genes process information through signaling pathways. In reality, this is much more complex system, but anyway, we don’t have time to elaborate this. This system operates like quantum computer, which now is quite popular because, well, the United States now in the competition with China. Who will first get quantum computers, which will be a million times more proficient than carbon computers? But, in our body, we are dealing with quantum computer. Abnormal genes form very complex signaling network and this is cancer genome, which exists parallel to our normal genome. This cancer genome needs to be destroyed because, if it’s not destroyed, the cancer will always come back because we have a problem in our body, how to make cancer cells. Surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy are not able to do it. This is the cyber wall, which needs completely different approach. It can be conquered by using antineoplastons in combination with gene-targeted therapy and immunotherapy.