bonginoreport--2020-10-17--Upcoming Debate Moderator Has Deep Ties to Democrat Party

Sign up for our special edition newsletter to get updates on the 2020 presidential election and more .
All eyes are turning to NBC News White House correspondent Kristen Welker as she prepares to host the third and final presidential debate Thursday .
President Trump and Joe Biden will square off at Belmont University in Nashville , Tenn. , in a 90-minute debate starting at 9 p.m. Welker , 44 , has been the White House correspondent at NBC News since 2011 , after working as a news reporter in Rhode Island .
But Trump supporters who took issue with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wallace and Savannah Guthrie may find themselves pining for those combative hosts after Welker is done with the president .
Welker comes from an established Democratic family — who have poured cash into party coffers , and to Trump opponents , for years .
Her mother , Julie Welker , a prominent real estate broker in Philadelphia , and father , Harvey Welker , a consulting engineer , have donated tens of thousands of dollars to Democratic candidates and close to $ 20,000 to Barack Obama alone .
There was also $ 3,300 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and $ 2,100 for Hillary Clinton ’ s doomed 2016 presidential effort against Trump .
Another $ 7,300 was contributed to the Democratic National Committee between 2004 and 2020 .
In 2012 , Welker and her family celebrated Christmas at the White House with the Obamas .
Though Kristen Welker ’ s party registration is not listed today , she was a registered Democrat in Washington , DC , in 2012 and in Rhode Island in 2004 .
Throughout Welker ’ s tenure as a White House correspondent , she has earned a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Mr .
President , yes or no .
… have you ever worked for Russia .
Yes or no ?
” she demanded during a confrontation in January 2019 .
The treatment stands in stark contrast to her handling of Democratic politicos .
In March 2016 Welker was busted on live television tipping off Hillary Clinton ’ s Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri about at least one question she planned to ask her during a post-debate interview in Michigan .
At the time Clinton was locked in a fierce fight for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ I ’ m going to ask you about Flint , ” Welker said of the Michigan city ’ s infamous water crisis .
Welker deleted her Twitter account last week , heading off a more complete look at her past statements and views .
It was later restored .
“ Anyone who ’ s ever dealt with Welker knows she ’ s an activist , not a reporter .
The White House press team views her the same way they would AOC or Pelosi if they walked in the office , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Post .

Sign up for our special edition newsletter to get updates on the 2020 presidential election and more.
All eyes are turning to NBC News White House correspondent Kristen Welker as she prepares to host the third and final presidential debate Thursday.
President Trump and Joe Biden will square off at Belmont University in Nashville, Tenn., in a 90-minute debate starting at 9 p.m.
Welker, 44, has been the White House correspondent at NBC News since 2011, after working as a news reporter in Rhode Island.
But Trump supporters who took issue with hard questioning by previous moderators like Chris Wallace and Savannah Guthrie may find themselves pining for those combative hosts after Welker is done with the president.
Welker comes from an established Democratic family — who have poured cash into party coffers, and to Trump opponents, for years.
Her mother, Julie Welker, a prominent real estate broker in Philadelphia, and father, Harvey Welker, a consulting engineer, have donated tens of thousands of dollars to Democratic candidates and close to $20,000 to Barack Obama alone.
There was also $3,300 for Joe Biden’s 2020 campaign and $2,100 for Hillary Clinton’s doomed 2016 presidential effort against Trump. Another $7,300 was contributed to the Democratic National Committee between 2004 and 2020.
In 2012, Welker and her family celebrated Christmas at the White House with the Obamas.
Previous 1 of 6 Next Advertisement Kirsten Welker pictured on Dec 13, 2012 with the Obamas in the White House. Facebook Welker with her mother and father. Facebook Advertisement Donald Trump dismisses a question from NBC News correspondent Kristen Welker in May, 2019. REUTERS President Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden participate in the first debate last month. Scott Olson/Getty Images Advertisement
Though Kristen Welker’s party registration is not listed today, she was a registered Democrat in Washington, DC, in 2012 and in Rhode Island in 2004.
Throughout Welker’s tenure as a White House correspondent, she has earned a reputation for a scathing style of questioning.
“Mr. President, yes or no. … have you ever worked for Russia. Yes or no?” she demanded during a confrontation in January 2019.
The treatment stands in stark contrast to her handling of Democratic politicos.
In March 2016 Welker was busted on live television tipping off Hillary Clinton’s Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri about at least one question she planned to ask her during a post-debate interview in Michigan. At the time Clinton was locked in a fierce fight for the Democratic nomination against Sen. Bernie Sanders.
“I’m going to ask you about Flint,” Welker said of the Michigan city’s infamous water crisis.
Welker deleted her Twitter account last week, heading off a more complete look at her past statements and views. It was later restored.
“Anyone who’s ever dealt with Welker knows she’s an activist, not a reporter. The White House press team views her the same way they would AOC or Pelosi if they walked in the office,” a senior White House official told The Post.


bonginoreport--2020-10-17--Why the Left Wants Everyone to Believe the U.S. Is Racist Forever

As leftists believe racism is constant throughout American history , they take the absence of racist sentiments to mean racism is hiding deep in our minds .
That America is a racist country is the great self-evident truth of the left and of the ruling class whose moral opinions are shaped by it .
This truth is self-evident in the sense of being readily apparent to them , as evidenced by the countless disparities in life outcomes between blacks and whites .
No explanation for these disparities is ever required .
Their mere existence is proof of racism .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Indians and whites , and between Nigerian immigrants and whites all go studiously ignored since these groups generally outperform whites in income and educational attainment .
Also ignored is the role that the pathologies of inner-city black culture — fatherlessness , crime , nihilistic alienation , and the exaltation of thuggery — play in producing and sustaining disparities .
America ’ s racist nature is also self-evident in the philosophical sense .
It is an axiomatic truth : the predicate ( racism ) is contained in the subject ( America ) .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , by definition , single , so is America , by definition , racist .
Formulated as such , the self-evident truth of American racism can not be refuted .
It is impervious to counterarguments , data , and historical developments .
Believers in American racism don ’ t care about your facts .
In 1991 , Derrick Bell , one of the founders of critical race theory , declared that blacks had made no progress in America since 1865 .
He made this claim with a straight face at Harvard University , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for two decades .
In 1865 , Harvard did not admit black students .
In 2020 , the claim that America is fundamentally racist is a lie .
But it is a lie tenaciously defended by those on the left who most benefit from it : the Democratic Party , its progressive allies in the academy , the intelligentsia and the media , and black political leadership .
As the ultimate arbiters of all racial controversies , the left have positioned themselves to occupy the moral high ground in America — the most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The accusation of racism is their most powerful political weapon .
Playing the race card allows them to detract attention from their own corruption and the radical ideas they espouse .
Whatever faults they have , at least they ’ re not racists like Donald Trump , the Republicans , and their base of deplorables .
The right is thus constrained to fight the enemy on the enemy ’ s own terms .
Republican claims that “ Democrats are the real racists ” inevitably fall flat .
The national obsession with racism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ work in the diversity and grievance industries .
It is perhaps most useful for corporate and financial elites , who use it to distract Americans and direct their ire away from urban oligarchs like themselves toward the nebulous forces of racism .
Corporate America is afraid of socialism , not of Black Lives Matter .
The anti-capitalists hate the rich and corporations .
The anti-racists do not ; they can readily be bought off with performative wokeness and a sprinkling of diversity hires in the C-Suite .
Well-intentioned Americans of all races must @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vested interest in keeping America “ racist ” forever .
No set of attainable conditions would ever lead them to admit that America is no longer racist .
No sooner would the reparations checks be issued than new demands would arise .
None of this is to deny that America was racist for centuries , that the legacy of racism is still with us , and that some racism endures to this day .
But the Constitution of the United States is colorblind , and America ’ s Declaration of Independence proclaims that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ There are no racist laws or regulations on the books anywhere in America — not at the federal level , not in any of the 50 states , and not in any of the 19,502 incorporated cities , towns , and villages .
Since 1964 , America has also had a Civil Rights Act that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race in both the public and private sectors .
In explicit violation of the legislative history and text of the law , the act has been interpreted by the highest court of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ action , ” i.e .
racial preferences to benefit blacks ( and to a lesser extent , Hispanics ) .
America thus finds itself in the paradoxical position of being a purportedly white supremacist nation that officially sanctions and practices discrimination against whites .
Well , a critic might say , the laws may not be racist , but don ’ t police enforce them in a racist way ?
The overpublicized deaths of George Floyd , Rayshard Brooks , James Blake , and others before them supposedly prove that a “ legalized @ @ @ @ @ @ @ place .
Yet none of the major studies of lethal shootings by police officers find evidence of racial bias .
In fact , controlling for the very high black crime rate — African-Americans make up 13 percent of the population but commit more than 50 percent of homicides and about 60 percent of robberies — and the higher rate at which black suspects resist arrest , the share of blacks killed by cops is lower than one would expect .
Somehow , America remains a racist country even as elected officials in both @ @ @ @ @ @ @ blacks in particular , while paying no attention to whites as a group .
The Republican Party studiously ignores whites , busy as it is courting the “ naturally conservative ” Hispanic vote , while the Democratic Party increasingly adopts the anti-white animus of Black Lives Matter and the rest of the woke left .
Because the demand for racism so completely outstrips the actual supply , we are left with unfalsifiable accusations of “ dog-whistling ” — non-racist statements that supposedly send covert racist messages .
Once every few years , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his foot in his mouth and speak indelicately about race .
Whenever this happens , the offender is universally condemned , with the loudest denunciations coming from the Republican Party and the conservative establishment , and the offender promptly apologizes .
Such is the odd nature of “ systemic ” American racism , that racists are immediately denounced and eager to repent .
African-Americans occupy a larger place in the country ’ s collective imagination than any other group .
They exert enormous cultural influence not just in America , but across the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is more honored for its accomplishments , real or fake ( no , a black man did not invent the lightbulb ) .
The closest thing America has to a secular saint is Martin Luther King , Jr .
Even the recent allegations that he may have been a serial philanderer who laughed as a woman was raped in front of him did not dent his reputation .
In the public square , at school , and at work , Americans are also increasingly compelled to profess devotion to the creed of Anti-Racism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ No one gets canceled for abandoning their children , betraying the country , or committing any number of immoral , indecent , or criminal acts .
There is only one unforgivable sin : to deviate from the accepted script when speaking of African-Americans — and to a lesser extent , any of the other protected identity groups .
Amid widespread sympathy for blacks , affirmative action policies , and the absence of racist laws , we are told that racism is nonetheless institutionalized — though there are no institutions of any significance in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to white supremacy .
The Southern Poverty Law Center , an alarmist fundraising machine for its now disgraced founder Morris Dees , keeps track of about 940 hate groups operating within our borders ( more than a quarter of which are black separatists ) .
By focusing on the number of groups , the SPLC can ignore their insignificant size , lack of funds , and complete marginalization in American life .
By the SPLC ’ s count , there are 47 Ku Klux Klan groups in America — but their total membership @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Anti-Defamation League puts the total at 3,000 ) .
At its peak in the mid-1920s , the Klan had 6 million members ( in a country with a third of our current population ) .
So much for the institutions of hate .
Meanwhile , corporate America , the media , Hollywood , professional sports , philanthropic foundations , nonprofits , churches , the academy , the arts , and the military all vociferously denounce racism .
All eagerly embrace the diversity agenda .
All are obsessed with hiring and promoting people of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Frontier And this brings us to perhaps the strangest feature of America ’ s purportedly racist society : the growing phenomenon of whites passing as nonwhites .
Elizabeth Warren claims to be Cherokee , BLM ’ s Shaun King claims to be biracial , and a Jewish professor of African history at George Washington University is the new Rachel Dolezal .
Needless to say , no Afrikaner ever pretended to be “ colored ” under apartheid .
Where , then , is racism to be found in America , if it is not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and its institutions ?
Polls make it hard to find , too .
Eighty-seven percent of Americans approve of black-white marriage , up from 4 percent in 1954 .
Gallup calls it “ one of the largest shifts of public opinion in Gallup history.
” When researchers asked teenagers to name the most famous Americans in history ( excluding presidents ) , their top three picks were MLK , Rosa Parks , and Harriet Tubman .
The last frontier is now the subconscious .
Because the quantity of racism is held to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ absence of racist sentiments in people can only mean that racism is hiding deep in the recesses of their minds .
With the help of Harvard University ’ s widely touted Implicit Association Test , everyone ’ s latent racism can now be brought to the fore .
The test , of course , reveals no such thing .
A peer-reviewed study found “ little evidence to support [ its ] more provocative claim : that people possess unconscious racist attitudes.
” Even Vox had to admit that “ it might not work @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all we are left with as the definitive proof of American racism today is “ systemic racism , ” the meaning of which boils down to : America is racist because , well , it just is .
Racism somehow suffuses the whole even though it is not visible in any of its major parts .
Whereas all other racist regimes in history openly proclaimed their racism , America has pulled off the amazing feat of purging its laws , institutions , and culture of racism — all in the interest , of @ @ @ @ @ @

That America is a racist country is the great self-evident truth of the left and of the ruling class whose moral opinions are shaped by it. This truth is self-evident in the sense of being readily apparent to them, as evidenced by the countless disparities in life outcomes between blacks and whites. No explanation for these disparities is ever required. Their mere existence is proof of racism.
The disparities between Asians and whites, between Indians and whites, and between Nigerian immigrants and whites all go studiously ignored since these groups generally outperform whites in income and educational attainment. Also ignored is the role that the pathologies of inner-city black culture — fatherlessness, crime, nihilistic alienation, and the exaltation of thuggery — play in producing and sustaining disparities.
America’s racist nature is also self-evident in the philosophical sense. It is an axiomatic truth: the predicate (racism) is contained in the subject (America). In the same way that all bachelors are, by definition, single, so is America, by definition, racist.
Formulated as such, the self-evident truth of American racism cannot be refuted. It is impervious to counterarguments, data, and historical developments. Believers in American racism don’t care about your facts. In 1991, Derrick Bell, one of the founders of critical race theory, declared that blacks had made no progress in America since 1865. He made this claim with a straight face at Harvard University, where he had been a tenured professor for two decades. In 1865, Harvard did not admit black students.
In 2020, the claim that America is fundamentally racist is a lie. But it is a lie tenaciously defended by those on the left who most benefit from it: the Democratic Party, its progressive allies in the academy, the intelligentsia and the media, and black political leadership. As the ultimate arbiters of all racial controversies, the left have positioned themselves to occupy the moral high ground in America — the most important strategic position in any political conflict.
Using Racism as a Smokescreen
The accusation of racism is their most powerful political weapon. Playing the race card allows them to detract attention from their own corruption and the radical ideas they espouse. Whatever faults they have, at least they’re not racists like Donald Trump, the Republicans, and their base of deplorables. The right is thus constrained to fight the enemy on the enemy’s own terms. Republican claims that “Democrats are the real racists” inevitably fall flat.
The national obsession with racism is also obviously beneficial to those who work in the diversity and grievance industries. It is perhaps most useful for corporate and financial elites, who use it to distract Americans and direct their ire away from urban oligarchs like themselves toward the nebulous forces of racism. Corporate America is afraid of socialism, not of Black Lives Matter. The anti-capitalists hate the rich and corporations. The anti-racists do not; they can readily be bought off with performative wokeness and a sprinkling of diversity hires in the C-Suite.
Well-intentioned Americans of all races must understand that these powerful constituencies have a vested interest in keeping America “racist” forever. No set of attainable conditions would ever lead them to admit that America is no longer racist. No sooner would the reparations checks be issued than new demands would arise.
None of this is to deny that America was racist for centuries, that the legacy of racism is still with us, and that some racism endures to this day. But the Constitution of the United States is colorblind, and America’s Declaration of Independence proclaims that “all men are created equal.” There are no racist laws or regulations on the books anywhere in America — not at the federal level, not in any of the 50 states, and not in any of the 19,502 incorporated cities, towns, and villages.
The Actual Reality of ‘Racist’ Police
Since 1964, America has also had a Civil Rights Act that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race in both the public and private sectors. In explicit violation of the legislative history and text of the law, the act has been interpreted by the highest court of the land to countenance so-called “affirmative action,” i.e. racial preferences to benefit blacks (and to a lesser extent, Hispanics). America thus finds itself in the paradoxical position of being a purportedly white supremacist nation that officially sanctions and practices discrimination against whites.
Well, a critic might say, the laws may not be racist, but don’t police enforce them in a racist way? The overpublicized deaths of George Floyd, Rayshard Brooks, James Blake, and others before them supposedly prove that a “legalized genocide of colored people” is taking place.
Yet none of the major studies of lethal shootings by police officers find evidence of racial bias. In fact, controlling for the very high black crime rate — African-Americans make up 13 percent of the population but commit more than 50 percent of homicides and about 60 percent of robberies — and the higher rate at which black suspects resist arrest, the share of blacks killed by cops is lower than one would expect.
Somehow, America remains a racist country even as elected officials in both parties openly pander to racial minorities, blacks in particular, while paying no attention to whites as a group. The Republican Party studiously ignores whites, busy as it is courting the “naturally conservative” Hispanic vote, while the Democratic Party increasingly adopts the anti-white animus of Black Lives Matter and the rest of the woke left. Because the demand for racism so completely outstrips the actual supply, we are left with unfalsifiable accusations of “dog-whistling” — non-racist statements that supposedly send covert racist messages.
Once every few years, it is true, a Republican will put his foot in his mouth and speak indelicately about race. Whenever this happens, the offender is universally condemned, with the loudest denunciations coming from the Republican Party and the conservative establishment, and the offender promptly apologizes. Such is the odd nature of “systemic” American racism, that racists are immediately denounced and eager to repent.
The New Unforgivable Sin
African-Americans occupy a larger place in the country’s collective imagination than any other group. They exert enormous cultural influence not just in America, but across the globe. At home, no group is more honored for its accomplishments, real or fake (no, a black man did not invent the lightbulb). The closest thing America has to a secular saint is Martin Luther King, Jr. Even the recent allegations that he may have been a serial philanderer who laughed as a woman was raped in front of him did not dent his reputation.
In the public square, at school, and at work, Americans are also increasingly compelled to profess devotion to the creed of Anti-Racism. The thought police are everywhere. No one gets canceled for abandoning their children, betraying the country, or committing any number of immoral, indecent, or criminal acts. There is only one unforgivable sin: to deviate from the accepted script when speaking of African-Americans — and to a lesser extent, any of the other protected identity groups.
Amid widespread sympathy for blacks, affirmative action policies, and the absence of racist laws, we are told that racism is nonetheless institutionalized — though there are no institutions of any significance in America committed to racism, let alone to white supremacy.
The Southern Poverty Law Center, an alarmist fundraising machine for its now disgraced founder Morris Dees, keeps track of about 940 hate groups operating within our borders (more than a quarter of which are black separatists). By focusing on the number of groups, the SPLC can ignore their insignificant size, lack of funds, and complete marginalization in American life.
By the SPLC’s count, there are 47 Ku Klux Klan groups in America — but their total membership is between 5,000 and 8,000 (the Anti-Defamation League puts the total at 3,000). At its peak in the mid-1920s, the Klan had 6 million members (in a country with a third of our current population).
So much for the institutions of hate. Meanwhile, corporate America, the media, Hollywood, professional sports, philanthropic foundations, nonprofits, churches, the academy, the arts, and the military all vociferously denounce racism. All eagerly embrace the diversity agenda. All are obsessed with hiring and promoting people of color.
The Mind is the Last Frontier
And this brings us to perhaps the strangest feature of America’s purportedly racist society: the growing phenomenon of whites passing as nonwhites. Elizabeth Warren claims to be Cherokee, BLM’s Shaun King claims to be biracial, and a Jewish professor of African history at George Washington University is the new Rachel Dolezal. Needless to say, no Afrikaner ever pretended to be “colored” under apartheid.
Where, then, is racism to be found in America, if it is not in its law, its public rhetoric, and its institutions? Polls make it hard to find, too. Eighty-seven percent of Americans approve of black-white marriage, up from 4 percent in 1954. Gallup calls it “one of the largest shifts of public opinion in Gallup history.” When researchers asked teenagers to name the most famous Americans in history (excluding presidents), their top three picks were MLK, Rosa Parks, and Harriet Tubman.
The last frontier is now the subconscious. Because the quantity of racism is held to be constant throughout American history, the absence of racist sentiments in people can only mean that racism is hiding deep in the recesses of their minds.
With the help of Harvard University’s widely touted Implicit Association Test, everyone’s latent racism can now be brought to the fore. The test, of course, reveals no such thing. A peer-reviewed study found “little evidence to support [its] more provocative claim: that people possess unconscious racist attitudes.” Even Vox had to admit that “it might not work at all.”
In the end, all we are left with as the definitive proof of American racism today is “systemic racism,” the meaning of which boils down to: America is racist because, well, it just is. Racism somehow suffuses the whole even though it is not visible in any of its major parts. Whereas all other racist regimes in history openly proclaimed their racism, America has pulled off the amazing feat of purging its laws, institutions, and culture of racism — all in the interest, of course, of perpetuating racism.
Republished from RealClearPublicAffairs, with permission.
David Azerrad is an Assistant Professor and Research Fellow at Hillsdale College’s Van Andel Graduate School of Government in Washington, D.C. He previously worked at The Heritage Foundation and as a foreign correspondent in Asia.


bonginoreport--2020-10-17--House Republicans Want to Know if the FBI Had Possession of Hunter Biden’s Hard Drive in 2019

House Republicans demand answers from FBI director about Hunter Biden 's hard drive after NY Post exposé They want to @ @ @ @ @ possession of the hard drive in 2019

Nineteen Republican lawmakers in the U.S. House of Representatives signed a letter demanding answers from FBI Director Christopher Wray about whether the bureau had possession of a hard drive that led to the controversial New York Post exposé.
Catherine Herridge of CBS News posted the letter to her social media account on Friday:
"Yesterday, the New York Post published an article entitled, 'Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad.' The article documents how a recently uncovered laptop and hard drive allegedly revealed e-mails to and from Hunter Biden that strongly indicated that former Vice President Joe Biden was, in fact, aware of his son's overseas dealings," the letter read.
The letter went on to address the allegation that the FBI was in possession of the hard drive in 2019.
"This action took place right at the end of the U.S. House of Representative's impeachment sham against President Donald J. Trump, and right before the U.S. Senate tried the case. A large portion of the President's legal defense case revolved around strong evidence that former Vice President Biden's son, Hunter, was peddling his influence to his father to land lucrative jobs overseas that he might not have otherwise been qualified for," the letter continued.
The letter went on to call it a "gross error of judgement" and a "severe violation of trust" if the FBI had been in possession of the hard drive and had not divulged the information that was so damaging to the Biden campaign.
They demanded the FBI answer if they had possession of the hard drive, whether they had informed the White House or the Department of Justice about the hard drive, and if they had authenticated the evidence.
The lawmakers asked for an answer to their letter from Wray by Thursday.
Also on Friday, Biden snapped at a reporter who asked him to respond to the New York Post story, and instead accused him of participating in a smear campaign against him.
Here's more about the NY Post Biden report:


bonginoreport--2020-10-17--Source Says Joe Biden Is in Fact the “Big Guy” Mentioned In Hunter’s Huge China Business Deal

We may need to give Hunter Biden a gift basket .
He dropped off his MacBook Pro for repairs in Delaware in April of 2019 but forgot to pick it up .
This led to the owner making a copy of the hard drive , giving it to Rudy Giuliani ’ s lawyer , but also the FBI .
Now , The New York Post has been sifting through all the sordid contents , especially scores of emails exposing what appears to be a lot of shady deals that enriched the Biden family .
Joe Biden claimed he didn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
That ’ s a lie .
Hunter was on the board of a Ukrainian energy company , Burisma , allegedly to sell access to top Obama officials for $ 50k/month .
Joe was introduced to those executives through Hunter .
And Burisma looks as if they were counting on Hunter to use his connections to keep the company out of legal trouble .
Joe Biden also came through there , firing the prosecutor looking into Burisma by threatening to withhold aid .
Yet , in a business pitch to a Chinese firm @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would be divided , with 10 percent of the equity in this arrangement doing to someone called “ the big guy ” ( via NY Post ) : Hunter Biden pursued lucrative deals involving China ’ s largest private energy company — including one that he said would be “ interesting for me and my family , ” emails obtained by The Post show .
One email sent to Biden on May 13 , 2017 , with the subject line “ Expectations , ” included details of “ remuneration packages ” for six @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Biden was identified as “ Chair / Vice Chair depending on agreement with CEFC , ” an apparent reference to the former Shanghai-based conglomerate CEFC China Energy Co. His pay was pegged at “ 850 ” and the email also noted that “ Hunter has some office expectations he will elaborate.
” In addition , the email outlined a “ provisional agreement ” under which 80 percent of the “ equity , ” or shares in the new company , would be split equally among four people whose initials correspond to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ H ” apparently referring to Biden .
The deal also listed “ 10 Jim ” and “ 10 held by H for the big guy ?
” Neither Jim nor the “ big guy ” was identified further .
Well , Fox News ’ source says that “ the big guy ” is former Vice President Joe Biden : One of the people on an explosive email thread allegedly involving Hunter Biden has corroborated the veracity of the messages , which appear to outline a payout for former Vice President Joe Biden as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ energy firm .
One email , dated May 13 , 2017 , and obtained by Fox News , includes a discussion of “ remuneration packages ” for six people in a business deal with a Chinese energy firm .
The email appeared to identify Hunter Biden as “ Chair / Vice Chair depending on agreement with CEFC , ” in an apparent reference to now-bankrupt CEFC China Energy Co .
The email includes a note that “ Hunter has some office expectations he will elaborate.
” A proposed equity split references “ 20 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 10 held by H for the big guy ?
” with no further details .
Fox News spoke to one of the people who was copied on the email , who confirmed its authenticity .
Sources told Fox News that `` the big guy '' is a reference to the former vice president .
The New York Post initially published the emails and other controversial messages that Fox News has also obtained .
Yeah , we can expect Joe to call a lid before 10 A.M and avoid the press like the plague @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is simply no denying these emails and there is zero evidence that this is any form of foreign interference .
Zero .
No matter how much the liberal media may think—it ’ s not true .
And there haven ’ t been any denials either .
Biden is just as crooked as Hillary .

We may need to give Hunter Biden a gift basket. He dropped off his MacBook Pro for repairs in Delaware in April of 2019 but forgot to pick it up. This led to the owner making a copy of the hard drive, giving it to Rudy Giuliani’s lawyer, but also the FBI. Now, The New York Post has been sifting through all the sordid contents, especially scores of emails exposing what appears to be a lot of shady deals that enriched the Biden family. Joe Biden claimed he didn’t know about Hunter’s deals. That’s a lie.
Hunter was on the board of a Ukrainian energy company, Burisma, allegedly to sell access to top Obama officials for $50k/month. Joe was introduced to those executives through Hunter. And Burisma looks as if they were counting on Hunter to use his connections to keep the company out of legal trouble. Joe Biden also came through there, firing the prosecutor looking into Burisma by threatening to withhold aid.
Yet, in a business pitch to a Chinese firm, Hunter outlined how this massive deal would be divided, with 10 percent of the equity in this arrangement doing to someone called “the big guy” (via NY Post):
Hunter Biden pursued lucrative deals involving China’s largest private energy company — including one that he said would be “interesting for me and my family,” emails obtained by The Post show. One email sent to Biden on May 13, 2017, with the subject line “Expectations,” included details of “remuneration packages” for six people involved in an unspecified business venture. Biden was identified as “Chair / Vice Chair depending on agreement with CEFC,” an apparent reference to the former Shanghai-based conglomerate CEFC China Energy Co. His pay was pegged at “850” and the email also noted that “Hunter has some office expectations he will elaborate.” In addition, the email outlined a “provisional agreement” under which 80 percent of the “equity,” or shares in the new company, would be split equally among four people whose initials correspond to the sender and three recipients, with “H” apparently referring to Biden. The deal also listed “10 Jim” and “10 held by H for the big guy?” Neither Jim nor the “big guy” was identified further.
Well, Fox News’ source says that “the big guy” is former Vice President Joe Biden:
WOW >> Sources tell Fox News that "the big guy" who was supposed to receive a 10% equity stake in Hunter's deal with the Chinese refers to former Vice President Joe Biden. https://t.co/HMDzHO2scY — Matt Wolking (Text TRUMP to 88022) (@MattWolking) October 17, 2020
Biden attacks a journalist.
Drip, drip, drip.
Erickson is the single brave journalist in DC so far. https://t.co/g6rCOPv3wV — Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) October 17, 2020
Hunter Biden secured millions of dollars for “The Big Man”.
It’s obvious the Big Man is @JoeBiden.
Corruption. — Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) October 17, 2020
One of the people on an explosive email thread allegedly involving Hunter Biden has corroborated the veracity of the messages, which appear to outline a payout for former Vice President Joe Biden as part of a deal with a Chinese energy firm. One email, dated May 13, 2017, and obtained by Fox News, includes a discussion of “remuneration packages” for six people in a business deal with a Chinese energy firm. The email appeared to identify Hunter Biden as “Chair / Vice Chair depending on agreement with CEFC,” in an apparent reference to now-bankrupt CEFC China Energy Co. The email includes a note that “Hunter has some office expectations he will elaborate.” A proposed equity split references “20” for “H” and “10 held by H for the big guy?” with no further details. Fox News spoke to one of the people who was copied on the email, who confirmed its authenticity. Sources told Fox News that "the big guy" is a reference to the former vice president. The New York Post initially published the emails and other controversial messages that Fox News has also obtained.
CBS’ @BoKnowsNews is the first reporter to ask @JoeBiden about the @nypost’s stories on his son.
Watch the former VP’s response.pic.twitter.com/hVYN4HNixC — Townhall.com (@townhallcom) October 17, 2020
Yeah, we can expect Joe to call a lid before 10 A.M and avoid the press like the plague until this election is over. There is simply no denying these emails and there is zero evidence that this is any form of foreign interference. Zero. No matter how much the liberal media may think—it’s not true. And there haven’t been any denials either. Biden is just as crooked as Hillary.
The Biden campaign is NOT saying it's not Hunter Biden's computer.
The Biden campaign is NOT saying these are not Hunter's photos.
The Biden campaign is NOT saying these are not Hunter's emails.
The Biden campaign is NOT saying the VP never met with Hunter's business partners. — Matt Wolking (Text TRUMP to 88022) (@MattWolking) October 16, 2020
There is zero evidence the reporting of Hunter Biden’s emails about his foreign business deals are a foreign disinformation campaign.
Zero evidence. — Matt Wolking (Text TRUMP to 88022) (@MattWolking) October 17, 2020


bonginoreport--2020-10-17--National Abortion Rights Action League Calls For Feinstein Removal After Barrett Hearings

Following the conclusion of the Senate Judiciary Committee 's confirmation hearing for Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett , NARAL Pro-Choice America President Ilyse Hogue denounced committee ranking member Dianne Feinstein .
Hogue wrote that Feinstein failed to acknowledge the opinions of majorities that `` have said unequivocally that they want to choose the next President '' to fill the absence created by the death of Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg in September .
`` This nomination is illegitimate and this process is a sham , '' Hogue wrote .
`` Tens of millions of Americans have already voted and majorities @ @ @ @ @ @ @ choose the next President who should fill this seat .
Amy Barrett and this power grab pose a grave threat to every freedom and right we hold dear and tears the very fabric of our democracy . ''
Following the hearings , Feinstein said , `` This has been one of the best Senate hearings that I 've participated in , and I want to thank you for your fairness and the opportunity of going back and forth . ''
She and Sen. Lindsey Graham , the committee chairman , even shared a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hang in the balance — deserve leadership that underscores how unprecedented , shameful and wrong this process is , '' Hogue concluded .
`` The Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee , Senator Dianne Feinstein , failed to make this clear and in fact offered an appearance of credibility to the proceedings that is wildly out of step with the American people . ''
Democrats argued that holding confirmation hearings less than a month away from an election , and after many had already cast their ballots by mail , set a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the Senate 's refusal to take up confirmation hearings after former President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland to replace Justice Antonin Scalia .
“ This process is a caricature of illegitimacy , ” said Sen. Patrick Leahy , a Vermont Democrat .
“ The fact that we had a nominee before Justice Ginsburg was even buried in order to jam this nomination through before the election .
That is a mark on the United States Senate , it will be a mark of a process of callous political power grab.
” NARAL @ @ @ @ @ @ @ progressive activism organization , in calling for Feinstein to step down from the Judiciary Committee .
“ It 's time for Sen. Feinstein to step down from her leadership position on the Senate Judiciary Committee .
If she wo n't , her colleagues need to intervene , '' said Brian Fallon , the executive director of Demand Justice .
Feinstein 's office did not immediately respond to the Washington Examiner 's request for comment .

Following the conclusion of the Senate Judiciary Committee's confirmation hearing for Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett, NARAL Pro-Choice America President Ilyse Hogue denounced committee ranking member Dianne Feinstein.
Hogue wrote that Feinstein failed to acknowledge the opinions of majorities that "have said unequivocally that they want to choose the next President" to fill the absence created by the death of Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg in September.
"This nomination is illegitimate and this process is a sham," Hogue wrote. "Tens of millions of Americans have already voted and majorities have said unequivocally that they want to choose the next President who should fill this seat. Amy Barrett and this power grab pose a grave threat to every freedom and right we hold dear and tears the very fabric of our democracy."
Following the hearings, Feinstein said, "This has been one of the best Senate hearings that I've participated in, and I want to thank you for your fairness and the opportunity of going back and forth."
She and Sen. Lindsey Graham, the committee chairman, even shared a hug.
"Americans — whose lives hang in the balance — deserve leadership that underscores how unprecedented, shameful and wrong this process is," Hogue concluded. "The Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator Dianne Feinstein, failed to make this clear and in fact offered an appearance of credibility to the proceedings that is wildly out of step with the American people."
Democrats argued that holding confirmation hearings less than a month away from an election, and after many had already cast their ballots by mail, set a dangerous precedent, and many drew comparisons to the Senate's refusal to take up confirmation hearings after former President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland to replace Justice Antonin Scalia.
“This process is a caricature of illegitimacy,” said Sen. Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat. “The fact that we had a nominee before Justice Ginsburg was even buried in order to jam this nomination through before the election. That is a mark on the United States Senate, it will be a mark of a process of callous political power grab.”
NARAL is joined by Demand Justice, a progressive activism organization, in calling for Feinstein to step down from the Judiciary Committee.
“It's time for Sen. Feinstein to step down from her leadership position on the Senate Judiciary Committee. If she won't, her colleagues need to intervene," said Brian Fallon, the executive director of Demand Justice.
Feinstein's office did not immediately respond to the Washington Examiner's request for comment.


bonginoreport--2020-10-18--President Trump Rallies in Nevada

President Trump Rallies in Nevada

President Trump delivered remarks at a campaign rally in Macon , Georgia , his second such event that day .
@ @

October 16, 2020
President Trump Campaign Rally in Macon, Georgia
President Trump delivered remarks at a campaign rally in Macon, Georgia, his second such event that day. This rally…


bonginoreport--2020-10-18--Twitter Removes Post About Masks From Top White House Coronavirus Adviser

Twitter removed a tweet from top White House coronavirus adviser Dr. Scott Atlas for questioning the effectiveness of masks in combatting COVID-19 .
Atlas ’ tweet read `` Masks work ?
NO '' and preceded several others that questioned the use of face coverings in preventing the spread of the coronavirus .
Atlas also used examples of areas where he had said 'cases exploded even with mandates ' including Los Angeles , Miami , Hawaii , Alabama , France , Philippines , United Kingdom , Spain and Israel .
In a statement to the Hill , Twitter said the doctor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of our COVID-19 Misleading Information Policy '' that “ prohibits sharing false or misleading content related to COVID-19 which could lead to harm.
” The White House coronavirus adviser added to his tweet , saying `` 'That means the right policy is @ realDonaldTrump guideline : use masks for their intended purpose - when close to others , especially hi risk .
Otherwise , social distance .
No widespread mandates .
# CommonSense , '' Atlas wrote .
DR ATLAS RESPONDS TO CNN ANCHOR AFTER TRUMP TAPS HIM NEW CORONAVIRUS ADVISER The removal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a series of actions the company has taken to either remove or flag posts by members of the Trump administration , including the president himself , that it says are misleading or false when it comes to issues ranging from the coronavirus pandemic to the upcoming presidential election .
The flagging or removal of tweets or other social media posts has taken on a heightened level of scrutiny from conservatives since both Twitter and Facebook last week took actions to halt a New York Post article centered around Hunter Biden – with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Senate decrying the move as censorship and calling on both companies to explain themselves before Congress .
Twitter ’ s removal of Atlas ’ tweet is also not the first time the medical professional has run afoul of big tech .
In September , a video of Atlas questioning the need for universal social distancing measures was removed from YouTube for violating community standards .
Atlas , who supports a full reopening of the economy , filmed an in-depth interview with the Hoover Institution where he discussed the possibility of allowing natural immunities @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out at the massive video platform during an interview with Fox News ’ Tucker Carlson – saying that YouTube was “ censoring science.
” CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP '' It ’ s a disaster , '' Atlas said .
`` We 've already seen the near obstruction of journalism .
When you start censoring science you are removing fact , removing the basic way that we decide what is truth in what is not .
This has been done I think historically in various countries and you know , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ edge of what is done in third world countries -- the countries we used to be proudly distinguished from , '' Atlas said .
Atlas has become one of the most controversial members of the White House coronavirus task force and has been frequently at odds with Dr. Anthony Fauci , another task force member and director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases , over a range of issues relating to the pandemic .

Twitter removed a tweet from top White House coronavirus adviser Dr. Scott Atlas for questioning the effectiveness of masks in combatting COVID-19.
Atlas’ tweet read "Masks work? NO" and preceded several others that questioned the use of face coverings in preventing the spread of the coronavirus. Atlas also used examples of areas where he had said 'cases exploded even with mandates' including Los Angeles, Miami, Hawaii, Alabama, France, Philippines, United Kingdom, Spain and Israel.
In a statement to the Hill, Twitter said the doctor’s tweet "was in violation of our COVID-19 Misleading Information Policy" that “prohibits sharing false or misleading content related to COVID-19 which could lead to harm.”
The White House coronavirus adviser added to his tweet, saying "'That means the right policy is @realDonaldTrump guideline: use masks for their intended purpose - when close to others, especially hi risk. Otherwise, social distance. No widespread mandates. #CommonSense," Atlas wrote.
DR ATLAS RESPONDS TO CNN ANCHOR AFTER TRUMP TAPS HIM NEW CORONAVIRUS ADVISER
The removal of Atlas’ tweet is the latest in a series of actions the company has taken to either remove or flag posts by members of the Trump administration, including the president himself, that it says are misleading or false when it comes to issues ranging from the coronavirus pandemic to the upcoming presidential election.
The flagging or removal of tweets or other social media posts has taken on a heightened level of scrutiny from conservatives since both Twitter and Facebook last week took actions to halt a New York Post article centered around Hunter Biden – with GOP lawmakers in both the House and Senate decrying the move as censorship and calling on both companies to explain themselves before Congress.
Twitter’s removal of Atlas’ tweet is also not the first time the medical professional has run afoul of big tech.
In September, a video of Atlas questioning the need for universal social distancing measures was removed from YouTube for violating community standards.
Atlas, who supports a full reopening of the economy, filmed an in-depth interview with the Hoover Institution where he discussed the possibility of allowing natural immunities to control the virus.
Atlas lashed out at the massive video platform during an interview with Fox News’ Tucker Carlson – saying that YouTube was “censoring science.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
"It’s a disaster," Atlas said. "We've already seen the near obstruction of journalism. When you start censoring science you are removing fact, removing the basic way that we decide what is truth in what is not. This has been done I think historically in various countries and you know, we are sort of teetering on the edge of what is done in third world countries -- the countries we used to be proudly distinguished from," Atlas said.
Atlas has become one of the most controversial members of the White House coronavirus task force and has been frequently at odds with Dr. Anthony Fauci, another task force member and director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, over a range of issues relating to the pandemic.


bonginoreport--2020-10-18--Biden Campaign’s Attempt to Spin Hunter’s Emails Goes Down in Flames

During a Sunday interview on Fox News , Biden campaign surrogate Jenna Arnold attempted to spin the New York Post 's stories about Hunter Biden selling the Ukrainians access to his father , then-Vice President Joe Biden .
According to Arnold , the emails are `` unconfirmed '' yet she failed to say whether or not they were actually Hunter 's .
She said she appreciated the Trump campaign being pressed on the issue `` that so much of this is unconfirmed . ''
`` Jenna , it 's real simple .
You 're saying it 's unconfirmed .
Tell @ @ @ @ @ @ @ '' Vittert hit back .
`` Hunter Biden knows what emails he has and has n't sent .
Are you saying , and the campaign saying , these emails are n't his ? ''
Instead of giving a firm `` yes '' or `` no '' to the question , Arnold attempted to spin .
`` It 's unclear to me – I would say what 's so important right now , from the American citizen and the media – yourself included , Leland – is to continue to ask clarifying questions about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , '' she said .
`` It 's imperative to know that the NSA told Trump that Giuliani was being played by these emails – '' she went on .
`` Again , Jenna , Jenna , Jenna .
The easiest thing in the world to do : stop with all the obfuscation .
The easiest thing in the world to do would be to say , 'These are n't Hunter Biden 's emails , ' '' the Fox News host explained .
`` Nobody , including Hunter Biden , and including the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The one time that Biden was asked about it , by a CBS reporter , the former vice president attacked him , saying this was part of his personal `` smear campaign . ''
`` The question is this : I thought demonizing the media was a threat to our democracy .
Every time President Trump attacks the media , Democrats – and yourself included – ca n't wait to yell about that .
Do n't the American people deserve something better than the former vice president attacking the person who asked a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Of course , Arnold made the claim that Biden `` did n't attack '' the CBS reporter .
Instead he called the question `` fake news . ''
`` 'It ’ s another smear campaign .
Right up your alley .
Those are the questions you always ask . '
That kind of sounds like an attack to me , '' the Fox News host said .
Arnold shook her head , saying she does n't consider it to be an attack .
Instead , she said the Trump campaign has launched attacks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Party to Nazi Germany .
Interestingly enough , she attempted to divert the conversation to the coronavirus of all things .
`` I 'm so confused , '' Vittert said , trying to follow Arnold 's logic .
`` I feel like you still have n't answered the fundamental question , which is : can anyone say that these emails are inauthentic ?
And so far I have n't heard anyone say that . ''
Arnold herself admitted that Vittert was right : nobody is saying they are inauthentic .

During a Sunday interview on Fox News, Biden campaign surrogate Jenna Arnold attempted to spin the New York Post's stories about Hunter Biden selling the Ukrainians access to his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden. According to Arnold, the emails are "unconfirmed" yet she failed to say whether or not they were actually Hunter's.
She said she appreciated the Trump campaign being pressed on the issue "that so much of this is unconfirmed."
"Jenna, it's real simple. You're saying it's unconfirmed. Tell us what parts are not true," Vittert hit back. "Hunter Biden knows what emails he has and hasn't sent. Are you saying, and the campaign saying, these emails aren't his?"
Instead of giving a firm "yes" or "no" to the question, Arnold attempted to spin.
"It's unclear to me – I would say what's so important right now, from the American citizen and the media – yourself included, Leland – is to continue to ask clarifying questions about this, why the FBI is investigating," she said.
"Whoa. Whoa. Whoa," Vittert interjected.
"It's imperative to know that the NSA told Trump that Giuliani was being played by these emails –" she went on.
"Again, Jenna, Jenna, Jenna. The easiest thing in the world to do: stop with all the obfuscation. The easiest thing in the world to do would be to say, 'These aren't Hunter Biden's emails,'" the Fox News host explained. "Nobody, including Hunter Biden, and including the campaign, has said it."
The one time that Biden was asked about it, by a CBS reporter, the former vice president attacked him, saying this was part of his personal "smear campaign."
"The question is this: I thought demonizing the media was a threat to our democracy. Every time President Trump attacks the media, Democrats – and yourself included – can't wait to yell about that. Don't the American people deserve something better than the former vice president attacking the person who asked a legitimate question?" Vittert asked.
Of course, Arnold made the claim that Biden "didn't attack" the CBS reporter. Instead he called the question "fake news."
Vittert reread Biden's statement.
"'It’s another smear campaign. Right up your alley. Those are the questions you always ask.' That kind of sounds like an attack to me," the Fox News host said.
Arnold shook her head, saying she doesn't consider it to be an attack. Instead, she said the Trump campaign has launched attacks on Biden by comparing the Chinese Communist Party to Nazi Germany.
Interestingly enough, she attempted to divert the conversation to the coronavirus of all things.
"I'm so confused," Vittert said, trying to follow Arnold's logic. "I feel like you still haven't answered the fundamental question, which is: can anyone say that these emails are inauthentic? And so far I haven't heard anyone say that."
Arnold herself admitted that Vittert was right: nobody is saying they are inauthentic.


bonginoreport--2020-10-18--Biden’s Granddaughter Says He’ll Implement a Far-Left Agenda

Naomi , the 26-year-old daughter of Hunter Biden , has been highly active in the Biden-Harris campaign , speaking at the Democratic National Convention and several campaign events along with frequently attacking President Trump on Twitter .
On July 12th , Naomi Biden responded to a tweet from Donald Trump Jr. which linked to an article entitled “ Pence : Only Thing Standing Between America and Agenda of Far Left Is 4 More Years of President Donald Trump.
” Naomi Biden appears to affirm the words of Vice President Pence , whose remarks in full insist that “ Joe Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ radical left ” : “ The only thing standing between the American people and the agenda of the far left is four more years of President Donald Trump in the White House .
I really believe that the American people know our President is a fighter and , as he said when he stood before Mount Rushmore , we ’ re going to fight for our military , we ’ re going to fight for a strong economy , we ’ re going to fight for all the liberties and values the American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re going to fight for America .
We ’ re going to fight for all of the values and ideals and traditions of this country , which , again , to hear Joe Biden talk is to—he speaks about transforming America .
President Donald Trump and I in our first three years – we were renewing America .
We were making America great again and building on the foundation of all that ’ s best about this country .
But Joe Biden is driven by the agenda of the radical left .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ America.
” Naomi Biden ’ s tweet confirms a frequent angle of attack from President Trump and his campaign : Joe Biden is a trojan horse for the radical left .
The candidate ’ s granddaughter also shared videos from the Chinese Communist Party-compromised TikTok app that implore voters to select Joe Biden for president .

Naomi Biden, the granddaughter of Democratic Presidential candidate Joe Biden, affirmed she “couldn’t agree more” with Vice President Mike Pence’s warning that, if elected, the former veep would implement the “agenda of the radical left.”
Naomi, the 26-year-old daughter of Hunter Biden, has been highly active in the Biden-Harris campaign, speaking at the Democratic National Convention and several campaign events along with frequently attacking President Trump on Twitter.
On July 12th, Naomi Biden responded to a tweet from Donald Trump Jr. which linked to an article entitled “Pence: Only Thing Standing Between America and Agenda of Far Left Is 4 More Years of President Donald Trump.”
Naomi Biden wrote “Again, I literally couldn’t agree more”:
Again, I literally couldn’t agree more. https://t.co/19bx6SxCXE — Naomi Biden (@NaomiBiden) July 12, 2020
Naomi Biden appears to affirm the words of Vice President Pence, whose remarks in full insist that “Joe Biden is driven by the agenda of the radical left”:
“The only thing standing between the American people and the agenda of the far left is four more years of President Donald Trump in the White House. I really believe that the American people know our President is a fighter and, as he said when he stood before Mount Rushmore, we’re going to fight for our military, we’re going to fight for a strong economy, we’re going to fight for all the liberties and values the American people cherish most. But also we’re going to fight for America. We’re going to fight for all of the values and ideals and traditions of this country, which, again, to hear Joe Biden talk is to—he speaks about transforming America. President Donald Trump and I in our first three years – we were renewing America. We were making America great again and building on the foundation of all that’s best about this country. But Joe Biden is driven by the agenda of the radical left. It’s an agenda to transform America.”
Naomi Biden’s tweet confirms a frequent angle of attack from President Trump and his campaign: Joe Biden is a trojan horse for the radical left.
The candidate’s granddaughter also shared videos from the Chinese Communist Party-compromised TikTok app that implore voters to select Joe Biden for president.


bonginoreport--2020-10-18--Crazy Nancy Sets 48-Hour Deadline for Coronavirus Relief Talks

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi established a 48-hour deadline to complete talks on a new round of federal coronavirus relief .
Pelosi told ABC 's George Stephanopoulos on Sunday that the deadline `` only relates if we want to get it done before the election , which we do . ''
The speaker said that her concerns focus on differences between the legal language in the House 's version of the bill and that of the White House negotiators .
`` We ’ re saying to them we have to freeze the design on some of these things , '' the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the language ?
... Shall is different from may .
The difference amounts to this : When you say ‘ may , ’ you ’ re giving the president a slush fund .
He may do this , he may grant , he may withhold . ''
The 48-hour deadline was first mentioned by Drew Hammill , the deputy chief of staff to Pelosi , in a trio of tweets Saturday night after the speaker spoke with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin by phone for an hour .
`` While there was some encouraging @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to do to ensure there is a comprehensive testing plan that includes contact tracing and additional measures to address the virus ’ disproportionate impact on communities of color , '' Hammill said .
`` There remains an array of additional differences as we go provision by provision that must be addressed in a comprehensive manner in the next 48 hours .
Decisions must be made by the White House .
[ sic ] in order to demonstrate that the Administration is serious about reaching a bipartisan agreement that provides for Americans with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pelosi said that despite the differences , she 's optimistic that a deal is in reach .
`` I ’ m optimistic , '' Pelosi said .
`` We ’ ve been back and forth on all this . ''
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell announced Saturday night that the Senate will try to pass a standalone stimulus bill next week to refund the Paycheck Protection Program .
`` Republicans do not agree that nothing is better than something for working families , '' the Kentucky Republican said in a statement referencing the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` The American people need Democrats to stop blocking bipartisan funding and let us replenish the PPP before more Americans lose their jobs needlessly . ''

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi established a 48-hour deadline to complete talks on a new round of federal coronavirus relief.
Pelosi told ABC's George Stephanopoulos on Sunday that the deadline "only relates if we want to get it done before the election, which we do."
The speaker said that her concerns focus on differences between the legal language in the House's version of the bill and that of the White House negotiators.
"We’re saying to them we have to freeze the design on some of these things," the California Democrat said. "What is the language? ... Shall is different from may. The difference amounts to this: When you say ‘may,’ you’re giving the president a slush fund. He may do this, he may grant, he may withhold."
The 48-hour deadline was first mentioned by Drew Hammill, the deputy chief of staff to Pelosi, in a trio of tweets Saturday night after the speaker spoke with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin by phone for an hour.
"While there was some encouraging news on testing, there remains work to do to ensure there is a comprehensive testing plan that includes contact tracing and additional measures to address the virus’ disproportionate impact on communities of color," Hammill said. "There remains an array of additional differences as we go provision by provision that must be addressed in a comprehensive manner in the next 48 hours. Decisions must be made by the White House . [sic] in order to demonstrate that the Administration is serious about reaching a bipartisan agreement that provides for Americans with the greatest needs during the pandemic."
Pelosi said that despite the differences, she's optimistic that a deal is in reach.
"I’m optimistic," Pelosi said. "We’ve been back and forth on all this."
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell announced Saturday night that the Senate will try to pass a standalone stimulus bill next week to refund the Paycheck Protection Program.
"Republicans do not agree that nothing is better than something for working families," the Kentucky Republican said in a statement referencing the small business loan Paycheck Protection Program. "The American people need Democrats to stop blocking bipartisan funding and let us replenish the PPP before more Americans lose their jobs needlessly."


bonginoreport--2020-10-18--5 Big Things Americans Can No Longer Take for Granted if Joe Biden Becomes President

When a different party takes over the Presidency , policy changes go with the territory .
However , the Democratic Party has gotten so extreme that you don ’ t have to just worry about higher taxes , weakness abroad , and new government programs .
There are some potentially radical norm shattering shifts that we could see if Joe Biden wins the presidency and his party is able to capture the Senate .
If Joe Biden becomes President , you can no longer take for granted that… 1 ) That we ’ ll have 9 members of the Supreme @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the Supreme Court since 1869 , but Democrats are so upset that Donald Trump got to pick 3 justices that they ’ re now seriously discussing packing the Supreme Court .
Both Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have rather famously refused to say whether they ’ ll support that , so it ’ s a real possibility .
Unfortunately , the moment the Democrats pack the court , the Constitution effectively ceases to exist , and the law becomes whatever the Democrats want it to be .
2 ) That the police @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trouble : What you ’ re seeing in many liberal cities is regular rioting supported by government officials .
The police aren ’ t allowed to use effective tactics to stop the riots and worse yet , in many cases , the district attorneys simply release the vast majority of the rioters without charges .
In those situations , the police inevitably pull back because there ’ s no point in arresting people that will be on the streets free and clear the next day with the blessing of the DA .
So @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mentality control the Department of Justice ?
Could you see the DOJ go after police departments for doing their jobs ?
Absolutely .
Could you see the DOJ under Biden accuse police departments of being racist for not letting protesters block traffic or harass people in residential neighborhoods ?
Absolutely .
There a lot of Democrats that want to turn every city in America into Minneapolis or Portland and under Joe Biden , they may increasingly get their way .
3 ) That you won ’ t be locked down again : The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Coronavirus and they did devastating damage to the economy .
Although there ’ s no chance Trump would lock the country down again , Joe Biden has said he is willing to do it .
As the Wall Street Journal noted : Which scientists would catch Joe Biden ’ s ear ?
Whichever ones say what the Left wants to hear .
Given that Democrats are absolutely terrified of the Coronavirus , it is well within the realm of possibility that Joe Biden would try to shut us down again .
4 ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government : One of the other changes near and dear to the hearts of Democrats is getting rid of the filibuster in the Senate .
If that were to happen and Democrats controlled the House , Senate , and Presidency , they could do anything they wanted .
The Green New Deal , banning guns , reparations , making Puerto Rico a state , you name it .
Of course , those moves would probably be unpopular , which could mean that the Republicans could take over , promptly reverse everything the Democrats @ @ @ @ @ @ @ changes .
Those types of wild shifts would be bad for the public , bad for the economy , and would lead to instability .
5 ) That we ’ ll have another fair election : Of course , there would be a simple solution to the problem posed in # 4 .
You change the rules so that the other side can never take power again .
If the Democrats packed the Supreme Court ( which they are considering ) and got rid of the filibuster for legislation ( which they are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ easy for them to change the rules of the game to lock Republicans out of power .
If the Democrats didn ’ t do it and Republicans got back into power , the GOP would be fools not to do it because eventually , the Democrats would .
It ’ s an ugly scenario that would lead to the end of the United States as we know it , but there are quite a few powerful Democrats that would consider that a price worth paying for getting their way .
Would Joe Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or three , Kamala Harris , do these things ?
We can ’ t know for sure , but every scenario addressed here is a realistic possibility .
Look at what the Democratic Party has become and ask yourself how sure you are that they can be counted on to put the good of the country ahead of the nation-killing policies their base will be howling for in 2021 if they win .
The only real hope we ’ d have on that front would be that a handful of Democratic holdouts would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Democrats tend to be when they really want something , it ’ s impossible to even count on that .
John Hawkins is the author of 101 Things All Young Adults Should Know .
You can find him on Parler here & Twitter here .

When a different party takes over the Presidency, policy changes go with the territory. However, the Democratic Party has gotten so extreme that you don’t have to just worry about higher taxes, weakness abroad, and new government programs. There are some potentially radical norm shattering shifts that we could see if Joe Biden wins the presidency and his party is able to capture the Senate. If Joe Biden becomes President, you can no longer take for granted that…
1) That we’ll have 9 members of the Supreme Court: There have been 9 justices on the Supreme Court since 1869, but Democrats are so upset that Donald Trump got to pick 3 justices that they’re now seriously discussing packing the Supreme Court. Both Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have rather famously refused to say whether they’ll support that, so it’s a real possibility. Unfortunately, the moment the Democrats pack the court, the Constitution effectively ceases to exist, and the law becomes whatever the Democrats want it to be.
2) That the police will be there if there’s trouble: What you’re seeing in many liberal cities is regular rioting supported by government officials. The police aren’t allowed to use effective tactics to stop the riots and worse yet, in many cases, the district attorneys simply release the vast majority of the rioters without charges. In those situations, the police inevitably pull back because there’s no point in arresting people that will be on the streets free and clear the next day with the blessing of the DA. So, what happens when people with that mentality control the Department of Justice? Could you see the DOJ go after police departments for doing their jobs? Absolutely. Could you see the DOJ under Biden accuse police departments of being racist for not letting protesters block traffic or harass people in residential neighborhoods? Absolutely. There a lot of Democrats that want to turn every city in America into Minneapolis or Portland and under Joe Biden, they may increasingly get their way.
3) That you won’t be locked down again: The lockdowns were completely ineffective at stopping the Coronavirus and they did devastating damage to the economy. Although there’s no chance Trump would lock the country down again, Joe Biden has said he is willing to do it. As the Wall Street Journal noted:
Asked in an ABC interview airing Sunday night whether he’d be willing to shut down the economy again to head off a new wave of coronavirus infection, he replied: “I would shut it down. I would listen to the scientists.” Ah, the resort to scientists. But which scientists? The truth is that the experts have been wrong numerous times in this pandemic, and they often disagree.
Which scientists would catch Joe Biden’s ear? Whichever ones say what the Left wants to hear. Given that Democrats are absolutely terrified of the Coronavirus, it is well within the realm of possibility that Joe Biden would try to shut us down again.
4) That we’ll have a stable government: One of the other changes near and dear to the hearts of Democrats is getting rid of the filibuster in the Senate. If that were to happen and Democrats controlled the House, Senate, and Presidency, they could do anything they wanted. The Green New Deal, banning guns, reparations, making Puerto Rico a state, you name it. Of course, those moves would probably be unpopular, which could mean that the Republicans could take over, promptly reverse everything the Democrats did, and make their own sweeping changes. Those types of wild shifts would be bad for the public, bad for the economy, and would lead to instability.
5) That we’ll have another fair election: Of course, there would be a simple solution to the problem posed in #4. You change the rules so that the other side can never take power again. If the Democrats packed the Supreme Court (which they are considering) and got rid of the filibuster for legislation (which they are considering), it would be very easy for them to change the rules of the game to lock Republicans out of power. If the Democrats didn’t do it and Republicans got back into power, the GOP would be fools not to do it because eventually, the Democrats would. It’s an ugly scenario that would lead to the end of the United States as we know it, but there are quite a few powerful Democrats that would consider that a price worth paying for getting their way.
Would Joe Biden or his likely replacement in a year or three, Kamala Harris, do these things? We can’t know for sure, but every scenario addressed here is a realistic possibility. Look at what the Democratic Party has become and ask yourself how sure you are that they can be counted on to put the good of the country ahead of the nation-killing policies their base will be howling for in 2021 if they win. The only real hope we’d have on that front would be that a handful of Democratic holdouts would spoil their plans and given how disciplined the Democrats tend to be when they really want something, it’s impossible to even count on that.
John Hawkins is the author of 101 Things All Young Adults Should Know. You can find him on Parler here & Twitter here.


bonginoreport--2020-10-18--How Pandemic May Make It Easier for Some to Get Into College

As if getting in to a top college was n't hard enough , Covid-19 adds a new challenge .
Amid the coronavirus pandemic , many would-be freshmen have decided to postpone college rather than start their education online .
As a result , colleges and universities are well below their enrollment numbers for the 2020-2021 academic year , a report shows .
Overall , undergraduate enrollment fell 4 % this year , according to data from National Student Clearinghouse Research Center , with incoming freshmen accounting for the biggest drop — sinking 16 % from last fall .
With a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and many international students unable to enter the U.S. , colleges and universities are even more concerned about hitting enrollment numbers going forward .
That could drive acceptance rates higher for the 2021-2022 academic year , according to Angel Perez , the CEO of the National Association for College Admission Counseling .
`` Most have seen a loss of students , '' Perez said .
`` What may happen next year is that institutions will be looking for more students to fill their classes . ''
More from Personal Finance : Here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ College students are worried about their financial future Pandemic sends young adults back to mom and dad But although admissions counselors have expressed concern about falling enrollment , that does n't mean college acceptance rates will rise across the board .
`` At the very top tier you are not going to see a lot of movement , but those institutions , as well , are very concerned about enrollment , '' Perez said .
Enrollment fell the most at community colleges , followed by public four-year schools , the National Student Clearinghouse @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for-profit colleges notched an enrollment gain in 2020 .

As if getting in to a top college wasn't hard enough, Covid-19 adds a new challenge.
Amid the coronavirus pandemic, many would-be freshmen have decided to postpone college rather than start their education online.
As a result, colleges and universities are well below their enrollment numbers for the 2020-2021 academic year, a report shows.
Overall, undergraduate enrollment fell 4% this year, according to data from National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, with incoming freshmen accounting for the biggest drop — sinking 16% from last fall.
With a number of undergraduates sitting this semester out, and many international students unable to enter the U.S., colleges and universities are even more concerned about hitting enrollment numbers going forward.
That could drive acceptance rates higher for the 2021-2022 academic year, according to Angel Perez, the CEO of the National Association for College Admission Counseling.
"Most have seen a loss of students," Perez said. "What may happen next year is that institutions will be looking for more students to fill their classes."
More from Personal Finance:
Here's how to get more financial aid
College students are worried about their financial future
Pandemic sends young adults back to mom and dad
But although admissions counselors have expressed concern about falling enrollment, that doesn't mean college acceptance rates will rise across the board.
"At the very top tier you are not going to see a lot of movement, but those institutions, as well, are very concerned about enrollment," Perez said.
Enrollment fell the most at community colleges, followed by public four-year schools, the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center found. Only private, for-profit colleges notched an enrollment gain in 2020.


bonginoreport--2020-10-18--This Week’s Leftist Violence and Intimidation

Violence and vandalism in Portland , Seattle , and elsewhere continued to fester this past week , but left-wing activists also attempted to disrupt political and legal processes in the name of social justice .
Here are some of the most egregious instances of politically motivated violence and intimidation from this week .
5 .
Democratic Lawmaker 's Stepson Arrested for Assaulting Officer , Planning Series of Attacks on Police The stepson of a former Democratic state representative in Washington was charged Friday with assaulting a police officer , attempted arson , and reckless burning .
Seattle police said the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` a high degree of sophistication '' and touted his work `` with pride . ''
His stepmother , former representative Laura Ruderman , has advocated releasing him into her custody , saying he 's `` basically a good kid , straight ‘ A ' student . ''
In an attempt to re-create the chaos that accompanied the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation battle , protesters forced Capitol Police to arrest them after they blocked the door to a Senate office building in opposition to Amy Coney Barrett ’ s confirmation to the Supreme Court @ @ @ @ @ @ @ evictions are an act of violence '' tried to chain shut the doors to Jackson County Courthouse Thursday .
The 16th Judicial Circuit stated that it would not shut down legal proceedings based on this attempted intimidation from activists , saying `` every citizen has a right to access the Courts . ''
2 .
Rioters Trash Oregon Historical Museum , Attempt to Set It on Fire Portland protesters smashed windows and doors and attempted to start a fire at the museum of the Oregon Historical Society , which states on its website @ @ @ @ @ @ @ treatment of all people and the elimination of discrimination in all forms . ''
A commemorative quilt sewn by African-American women to honor pivotal moments in black history was also damaged , and Mayor Ted Wheeler ( D. ) called the acts `` obscene . ''
1 .
Protesters in Portland Topple Statues of Lincoln and Roosevelt A protest in Portland called the `` Indigenous Peoples Day of Rage '' defaced and toppled statues of Abraham Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt .
Protesters screamed , `` F— all you colonizers '' as they tore @ @ @ @ @ @ @ base of the Lincoln statue had graffiti reading `` stolen land . ''

Violence and vandalism in Portland, Seattle, and elsewhere continued to fester this past week, but left-wing activists also attempted to disrupt political and legal processes in the name of social justice. Here are some of the most egregious instances of politically motivated violence and intimidation from this week.
5. Democratic Lawmaker's Stepson Arrested for Assaulting Officer, Planning Series of Attacks on Police
The stepson of a former Democratic state representative in Washington was charged Friday with assaulting a police officer, attempted arson, and reckless burning. Seattle police said the 19-year-old plotted assaults and fire bombings with "a high degree of sophistication" and touted his work "with pride." His stepmother, former representative Laura Ruderman, has advocated releasing him into her custody, saying he's "basically a good kid, straight 'A' student."
4. Protesters Arrested Trying to Disrupt Barrett Hearings
In an attempt to re-create the chaos that accompanied the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation battle, protesters forced Capitol Police to arrest them after they blocked the door to a Senate office building in opposition to Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation to the Supreme Court.
Conservative activists here to support Barrett are chanting 'law and order," a common Trump refrain, as anti-Barrett protesters are led away by police, their hands bound behind their backs. #SCOTUS #DCProtests pic.twitter.com/FLPuq6WHo6 — Marissa J. Lang (@Marissa_Jae) October 12, 2020
3. Kansas City Activists Lock Courthouse Doors to Stop Evictions
Kansas City activists claiming "all evictions are an act of violence" tried to chain shut the doors to Jackson County Courthouse Thursday. The 16th Judicial Circuit stated that it would not shut down legal proceedings based on this attempted intimidation from activists, saying "every citizen has a right to access the Courts."
BREAKING: KC Tenants has blockaded the court entrance. 6 people have chained the doors. The people have closed court for today. Every eviction is an act of violence. #endevictions pic.twitter.com/lkyn0vXosL — KC Tenants (@KCTenants) October 15, 2020
2. Rioters Trash Oregon Historical Museum, Attempt to Set It on Fire
Portland protesters smashed windows and doors and attempted to start a fire at the museum of the Oregon Historical Society, which states on its website it is "committed to the equitable treatment of all people and the elimination of discrimination in all forms." A commemorative quilt sewn by African-American women to honor pivotal moments in black history was also damaged, and Mayor Ted Wheeler (D.) called the acts "obscene."
1. Protesters in Portland Topple Statues of Lincoln and Roosevelt
A protest in Portland called the "Indigenous Peoples Day of Rage" defaced and toppled statues of Abraham Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt. Protesters screamed, "F— all you colonizers" as they tore Roosevelt's statue down, and the base of the Lincoln statue had graffiti reading "stolen land."
'F— all you colonizers!...Everyone of you that’s against Black Lives Matter can f— the f— off." Antifa rioters in the process of toppling the Portland statue of Roosevelt. They were soon successful in pulling it down. Video by rioter Tracy Lynn Molina. https://t.co/D5XgfX3slR — Andy Ngô (@MrAndyNgo) October 12, 2020
https://twitter.com/SVNewsAlerts/status/1315514533771964417


bonginoreport--2020-10-19--The 4th Quarter Has Historically Been the Best for Stocks

According to Bell , the S & P 500 typically sees an average gain of 3.9 % in the fourth quarter — making it the best three months of the year .
`` There 's a lot to worry about , '' she told CNBC 's `` Trading Nation `` on Friday .
`` But I am cautiously optimistic . ''
Despite stimulus gridlock , election uncertainty and the coronavirus ' path , the firm 's chief investment strategist believes it 's possible the S & P 500 will follow the positive historical trend .
`` We can still have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ past some of these uncertainties that are in the marketplace , '' she said .
`` So , while we may not get 3.9 % , I 'm going to try to remain cautiously optimistic here . ''
However , with just 12 trading days in the books in the fourth quarter , the S & P 500 is already up 3.6 % .
Bell points out the bulk of the gains usually come in November and December , not October .
`` Volatility is going to continue to be a key component @ @ @ @ @ @ @ '' she added .
`` It 's a little difficult to blindly trust historical trends in a year like this .
We 're up against a lot in the next couple of months . ''
One of the biggest risks she highlights is fallout from the coronavirus aid package delay .
`` The question mark is what is going to happen on the fiscal side as far as stimulus or fiscal aid goes for the consumer , '' said Bell , a CNBC contributor .
So far , there appears to be little @ @ @ @ @ @ @ September retail sales increased 1.9 % versus the 0.7 % Dow Jones consensus estimate .
`` Consumers have also put themselves in a better financial position that they were going into the crisis by paying down some debt , '' Bell noted .
`` So , I think that consumers are in a position to weather the storm for a couple more months .
But ultimately , fiscal aid is going to be needed . ''
Despite the risks , Bell does not think it 's a bad time to enter the market @ @ @ @ @ @ @ continue even if there are setbacks along the way .
`` We are in the later stages , at least I believe , of the coronavirus crisis , and we are still in positive stages of the reopening story , '' Bell said .
`` I 'm starting to begin to look at some of those value oriented sectors like the financials ...
These are the guys that are going to pop the most because they have underperformed most significantly . ''
She also likes small caps , which are also closely tied @ @ @ @ @ @ @ might be a little bit early while we 're still figuring out what that economic story is and how the economic trajectory plays out , '' Bell said .
`` But I 'd rather be in too early than too late . ''

According to Bell, the S&P 500 typically sees an average gain of 3.9% in the fourth quarter — making it the best three months of the year.
"There's a lot to worry about," she told CNBC's " Trading Nation " on Friday. "But I am cautiously optimistic."
Despite stimulus gridlock, election uncertainty and the coronavirus' path, the firm's chief investment strategist believes it's possible the S&P 500 will follow the positive historical trend.
"We can still have a good fourth quarter once we get past some of these uncertainties that are in the marketplace," she said. "So, while we may not get 3.9%, I'm going to try to remain cautiously optimistic here."
However, with just 12 trading days in the books in the fourth quarter, the S&P 500 is already up 3.6%. Bell points out the bulk of the gains usually come in November and December, not October.
"Volatility is going to continue to be a key component in through the next couple months," she added. "It's a little difficult to blindly trust historical trends in a year like this. We're up against a lot in the next couple of months."
One of the biggest risks she highlights is fallout from the coronavirus aid package delay.
"The question mark is what is going to happen on the fiscal side as far as stimulus or fiscal aid goes for the consumer," said Bell, a CNBC contributor.
So far, there appears to be little impact. The latest government data shows September retail sales increased 1.9% versus the 0.7% Dow Jones consensus estimate.
"Consumers have also put themselves in a better financial position that they were going into the crisis by paying down some debt," Bell noted. "So, I think that consumers are in a position to weather the storm for a couple more months. But ultimately, fiscal aid is going to be needed."
Despite the risks, Bell does not think it's a bad time to enter the market. She speculates the economic recovery will continue even if there are setbacks along the way.
"We are in the later stages, at least I believe, of the coronavirus crisis, and we are still in positive stages of the reopening story," Bell said. "I'm starting to begin to look at some of those value oriented sectors like the financials ... These are the guys that are going to pop the most because they have underperformed most significantly."
She also likes small caps , which are also closely tied to economic performance.
"These two might be a little bit early while we're still figuring out what that economic story is and how the economic trajectory plays out," Bell said. "But I'd rather be in too early than too late."
Disclaimer


bonginoreport--2020-10-19--Susan Stamper Brown: This Election There’s Only One Choice

As the last four years have made it clear : If you love America , there ’ s only one option on November 3 , 2020 .
This election is not about the left versus the right or Republicans versus Democrats .
The 2020 presidential race is between a man , President Trump , who unapologetically loves America and believes she is good -- and an empty shell of a man , Joe Biden , controlled by a movement that believes America is bad .
As Thomas Klingenstein , Chairman of the Claremont Institute alluded to in an excellent speech @ @ @ @ @ @ @ column , the Democratic Party exists today in name only ; the same group that controls Biden also controls the party at large .
Biden and Democrats succumbed to a neo-Marxist revolutionary movement whose goal is to destroy America , her culture and traditions , as soon as possible and by any means possible .
Joe Biden is a convenient means to their end .
The Democratic Party is now the Black Lives Matter/Antifa movement , and the Black Lives Matter/Antifa [ BLM ] movement is the Democratic Party .
There are no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And who are the BLM-Democrats today ?
BLM-Democrats divide and lump people into identity groups based on ethnicity , gender , race , sexual preference , and so on .
Rather than hard work and personal achievement , they redistribute power and wealth using physical and political force .
They silence opposition , seize guns and shutter churches .
They erase borders , foster sanctuary cities , implement socialism , pack courts and obliterate the rule of law .
Biden ’ s BLM-Democrats seek to destroy all institutions that foster traditional American values @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they demolished all statues , not just the Confederate ones -- to erase our past .
Be warned : They will destroy churches and synagogues next , along with the traditional family and the scientific ( and Biblical ) definition of male and female , and with them , our future .
Biden and his BLM-Democrats want to change the way we see ourselves , so they tell us we ’ re irredeemably bad , sinful , racist -- because we love America and long to make her great .
But those who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ -- it ’ s human nature to want who or what you love to prosper .
Those who love America are patriotic , with no apologies necessary .
This patriotism stems from a belief America is fundamentally good , not bad , or systematically racist , like BLM-Democrats claim .
We proudly state : “ I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands ; one nation under God , indivisible , with liberty and justice for all.
” We do not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do we bow before other humans in repentance for our skin color or sins we did not commit .
We are inclusive ; colorblindness is the rule , not the exception : “ We hold these truths to be self-evident : That all men are created equal ; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights : that among these are life , liberty and the pursuit of happiness… ” We are not many cultures ; we are one .
Therefore , we believe there are no black Americans or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ American-Americans sharing common ideals and surrounded by rights outlined in the U.S. Constitution .
We refuse to dwell on the past and look toward the future , believing the American way of life we embrace promises freedom for all .
Freedom of speech , freedom of thought , and freedom of , not from , religion .
We hold dear to this undeniable truth : Hard work and personal success lead to self-reliance and prosperity if you ’ re willing to work for it .
Joe Biden recently said he doesn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Not yet , but give him or his handlers six months , and this country will look radically different .
And then there is Trump .
A man of many faults , but someone equipped with exactly what we need to get us through these most uncertain and unprecedented times .
He ’ s courageous , has common sense , is colorblind , and is committed to America .
Trump unapologetically loves America and will fight to save us from radical BLM-Democrats .
The choice is clear : Either you are with us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Brown .
Susan is an award-winning columnist who lives in Alaska .
She feels safer around the grizzlies which roam her property than the leftists roaming worldwide .
She has written for scores of newspapers and media publications across the U.S. , including USA Today , Townhall , The Christian Post , GOPUSA , BizPac Review , and Jewish World Review .
Contact Susan at writestamper @ protonmail.com .

As the last four years have made it clear: If you love America, there’s only one option on November 3, 2020.
This election is not about the left versus the right or Republicans versus Democrats.
The 2020 presidential race is between a man, President Trump, who unapologetically loves America and believes she is good--and an empty shell of a man, Joe Biden, controlled by a movement that believes America is bad.
As Thomas Klingenstein, Chairman of the Claremont Institute alluded to in an excellent speech posted to YouTube, which inspired this column, the Democratic Party exists today in name only; the same group that controls Biden also controls the party at large. Biden and Democrats succumbed to a neo-Marxist revolutionary movement whose goal is to destroy America, her culture and traditions, as soon as possible and by any means possible.
Joe Biden is a convenient means to their end.
The Democratic Party is now the Black Lives Matter/Antifa movement, and the Black Lives Matter/Antifa [BLM] movement is the Democratic Party. There are no Democrats; there are only BLM-Democrats.
And who are the BLM-Democrats today? BLM-Democrats divide and lump people into identity groups based on ethnicity, gender, race, sexual preference, and so on. Rather than hard work and personal achievement, they redistribute power and wealth using physical and political force. They silence opposition, seize guns and shutter churches. They erase borders, foster sanctuary cities, implement socialism, pack courts and obliterate the rule of law.
Biden’s BLM-Democrats seek to destroy all institutions that foster traditional American values and principles. During the Biden-riots, they demolished all statues, not just the Confederate ones -- to erase our past. Be warned: They will destroy churches and synagogues next, along with the traditional family and the scientific (and Biblical) definition of male and female, and with them, our future.
Biden and his BLM-Democrats want to change the way we see ourselves, so they tell us we’re irredeemably bad, sinful, racist -- because we love America and long to make her great. But those who love America can’t help it -- it’s human nature to want who or what you love to prosper.
Those who love America are patriotic, with no apologies necessary. This patriotism stems from a belief America is fundamentally good, not bad, or systematically racist, like BLM-Democrats claim.
We proudly state: “I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands; one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”
We do not take a knee in protest. Nor do we bow before other humans in repentance for our skin color or sins we did not commit.
We are inclusive; colorblindness is the rule, not the exception: “We hold these truths to be self-evident: That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights: that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness…”
We are not many cultures; we are one. Therefore, we believe there are no black Americans or white Americans or hyphenated Americans, just American-Americans sharing common ideals and surrounded by rights outlined in the U.S. Constitution.
We refuse to dwell on the past and look toward the future, believing the American way of life we embrace promises freedom for all. Freedom of speech, freedom of thought, and freedom of, not from, religion. We hold dear to this undeniable truth: Hard work and personal success lead to self-reliance and prosperity if you’re willing to work for it.
Joe Biden recently said he doesn’t look or act like a radical. Not yet, but give him or his handlers six months, and this country will look radically different.
And then there is Trump. A man of many faults, but someone equipped with exactly what we need to get us through these most uncertain and unprecedented times. He’s courageous, has common sense, is colorblind, and is committed to America. Trump unapologetically loves America and will fight to save us from radical BLM-Democrats.
The choice is clear: Either you are with us or against America.
©2020 Susan Stamper Brown. Susan is an award-winning columnist who lives in Alaska. She feels safer around the grizzlies which roam her property than the leftists roaming worldwide. She has written for scores of newspapers and media publications across the U.S., including USA Today, Townhall, The Christian Post, GOPUSA, BizPac Review, and Jewish World Review. Contact Susan at writestamper@protonmail.com.