bonginoreport--2020-05-19--Federal Reserve to Start “Main Street Lending Program” by End of Month

The Federal Reserve ’ s program to lend to companies and state and local governments will start by the end of May , two top Fed officials said Tuesday .
Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren , whose regional bank is running the program for the central bank , said in a speech Tuesday that the program will kick off by the end of the month .
Earlier , Fed Chairman Jerome Powell said he expected the program would be ready to start at the first week of June at the latest .
The program is aimed at midsize to those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Paycheck Protection program but too small to access the credit markets .
Rosengren said these companies make up a major share of the U.S. workforce .
The loans are aimed at institutions that were on sound financial footing at the end of last year and only damaged by the pandemic .
The programs are 4-year loans aimed at getting firms through the pandemic caused by the novel strain of coronavirus .
Payments are deferred for one year .
Banks have to underwrite the loan and are required to take a stake in it—up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Some economists think firms will shy away from the lending program .
Some are pressing the Fed to lower the $ 500,000 loan minimum .
Powell said the Fed would be flexible and adjust the program if there was a lack of demand .
The central bank is already looking at how to expand the program to nonprofits .
Stocks were mixed on Tuesday with the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA , headed lower .

The Federal Reserve’s program to lend to companies and state and local governments will start by the end of May, two top Fed officials said Tuesday.
Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren, whose regional bank is running the program for the central bank, said in a speech Tuesday that the program will kick off by the end of the month.
Earlier, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell said he expected the program would be ready to start at the first week of June at the latest.
The program is aimed at midsize to those entities that are too big for the Paycheck Protection program but too small to access the credit markets.
Rosengren said these companies make up a major share of the U.S. workforce. The loans are aimed at institutions that were on sound financial footing at the end of last year and only damaged by the pandemic.
The programs are 4-year loans aimed at getting firms through the pandemic caused by the novel strain of coronavirus. Payments are deferred for one year.
Banks have to underwrite the loan and are required to take a stake in it—up to 15% for risky borrowers.
Some economists think firms will shy away from the lending program. Some are pressing the Fed to lower the $500,000 loan minimum.
Powell said the Fed would be flexible and adjust the program if there was a lack of demand. The central bank is already looking at how to expand the program to nonprofits.


bonginoreport--2020-05-19--Trump to Sign Executive Order Waiving Many Regulations to Bolster Economic Recovery

President Donald Trump will sign an executive order Tuesday aimed at fast-tracking economic recovery by rescinding or waving regulations he says are inhibiting rapid job growth .
Senior Trump administration officials told the Daily Caller that the Regulatory Relief to Support Economic Recovery Executive Order “ is the first time in living memory that a president has responded to a national crisis by deregulating instead of grabbing more power.
” The order would mimic action the administration took during the early days of the pandemic to expand health care services , specifically telehealth options , and hopes to provide economic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lost jobs due to state stay-at-home orders .
The latest unemployment figures from the Department of Labor show that that more than 36 million Americans have filed jobless claims since the coronavirus pandemic began .
Predictions from Goldman Sachs suggest that total U.S. unemployment could peak at 25 % in 2020 without serious government intervention .
Furthermore , the National Bureau of Economic Research recently warned that 42 % of all coronavirus-related job loss could be permanent .
( RELATED : Coronavirus Jobless Claims Top 36 Million After Department Of Labor Reports 2.98 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) White House officials say this new order will direct government agencies to identify any regulations that can be temporarily waived to “ promote job creation and growth.
” A secondary action directs agencies to determine which of the 600 regulations currently halted under the national emergency should be permanently rescinded .
“ The ability to eliminate these regulations on a temporary basis suggests that many may not have been needed in the first place , ” an official explained .
Finally , the order outlines a 10-point “ Regulatory Bill of Rights @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in expanding their workforce .
Both Acting Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought and Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs administrator Paul Ray praised the move in statements to the Daily Caller .
“ Typically when our country has faced a crisis , Washington responds by grabbing more power , ” Vought explained .
“ President Trump understands that to get the economy moving , the power needs to be given back to the people and entrepreneurs.
” “ If a bureaucratic rule needs to be suspended during a time of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we should ask ourselves if it makes sense to keep at all.
” Ray added that “ this new Executive Order makes clear just how unique this Administration ’ s perspective on the administrative state is.
” “ From antiquity to the present day , emergencies have been used by those in authority to expand their power , too often at the expense of the liberty of the people , ” he continued .
“ But this President thinks about things differently .
He has often attributed the unprecedented prosperity of the first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ energy and ingenuity of everyday Americans , unleashed by deregulation and tax cuts.
” “ He knows that what will jumpstart the economy is not Big Government , but the American people .
”

President Donald Trump will sign an executive order Tuesday aimed at fast-tracking economic recovery by rescinding or waving regulations he says are inhibiting rapid job growth.
Senior Trump administration officials told the Daily Caller that the Regulatory Relief to Support Economic Recovery Executive Order “is the first time in living memory that a president has responded to a national crisis by deregulating instead of grabbing more power.”
The order would mimic action the administration took during the early days of the pandemic to expand health care services, specifically telehealth options, and hopes to provide economic relief to the millions of Americans who lost jobs due to state stay-at-home orders.
The latest unemployment figures from the Department of Labor show that that more than 36 million Americans have filed jobless claims since the coronavirus pandemic began. Predictions from Goldman Sachs suggest that total U.S. unemployment could peak at 25% in 2020 without serious government intervention. Furthermore, the National Bureau of Economic Research recently warned that 42% of all coronavirus-related job loss could be permanent. (RELATED:Coronavirus Jobless Claims Top 36 Million After Department Of Labor Reports 2.98 Million New Claims Filed Over Past Week)
White House officials say this new order will direct government agencies to identify any regulations that can be temporarily waived to “promote job creation and growth.” A secondary action directs agencies to determine which of the 600 regulations currently halted under the national emergency should be permanently rescinded.
“The ability to eliminate these regulations on a temporary basis suggests that many may not have been needed in the first place,” an official explained.
Finally, the order outlines a 10-point “Regulatory Bill of Rights” designed to give small businesses security in expanding their workforce.
Both Acting Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought and Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs administrator Paul Ray praised the move in statements to the Daily Caller.
“Typically when our country has faced a crisis, Washington responds by grabbing more power,” Vought explained. “President Trump understands that to get the economy moving, the power needs to be given back to the people and entrepreneurs.”
“If a bureaucratic rule needs to be suspended during a time of crisis to help the American people, we should ask ourselves if it makes sense to keep at all.”
Ray added that “this new Executive Order makes clear just how unique this Administration’s perspective on the administrative state is.”
“From antiquity to the present day, emergencies have been used by those in authority to expand their power, too often at the expense of the liberty of the people,” he continued. “But this President thinks about things differently. He has often attributed the unprecedented prosperity of the first three years of his Administration to the energy and ingenuity of everyday Americans, unleashed by deregulation and tax cuts.”
“He knows that what will jumpstart the economy is not Big Government, but the American people.”


bonginoreport--2020-05-19--Susan Rice Email Reveals Comey Suggested “Sensitive” Info on Russia Not Be Shared With Flynn

Newly declassified portions of a key Susan Rice email confirm that Michael Flynn was personally targeted during a January 5 Oval Office meeting with Obama .
Michael Flynn was personally targeted during a crucial Jan. 5 , 2017 Oval Office meeting arranged by then-President Barack Obama , a newly declassified document shows .
On Jan. 20 , 2017 , as President Donald Trump was being inaugurated , former White House National Security Adviser Susan Rice sent herself a bizarre email detailing the Jan. 5 meeting between her , Obama , then-Vice President Joe Biden , then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Investigations Director James Comey .
In the email , portions of which were not declassified until recently , Rice recorded that Flynn , who at the time was the incoming national security adviser for Trump , was personally discussed and targeted during the meeting with Obama .
Declassified Susan Rice E-M… by The Federalist on Scribd “ From a national security perspective , President Obama said he wants to be sure that , as we engage with the incoming team , we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason we can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Russia.
” At the time , the Obama administration was actively spying on members of the Trump team as part of its Crossfire Hurricane investigation against Trump .
“ Comey said he does have some concerns that incoming NSA Flynn is speaking frequently with Russian Ambassador Kislyak , ” Rice wrote in a portion of the email that was only recently declassified .
“ Comey said that could be an issue as it relates to sharing sensitive information.
” “ President Obama asked if Comey was saying the NSC should not pass @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” Rice continued .
“ Comey replied ‘ potentially . '
” “ [ Comey ] added that he has no indication thus far that Flynn has passed classified information to Kislyak , but he noted that ‘ the level of communication is unusual . '
” The email did not explain how it would be “ unusual ” for an incoming national security adviser to converse with foreign leaders ahead of a new president ’ s inauguration .
Many observers believe the calls between Flynn and Kislyak were little more than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s spy campaign against Trump from the newly elected president ’ s team and to justify a continued inquisition against Flynn .
The newly declassified portions of the Jan. 5 Rice email confirm that the targeting of Flynn was coordinated within the inner sanctum of the White House and that both Obama and Biden were deeply involved in the campaign to take down Flynn .
Documents previously released and declassified showed that the FBI never possessed any evidence that Flynn was a secret Russian agent or that he had broken any laws .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s counterintelligence investigation against him , which was dated Jan. 4 , made clear that “ no derogatory information ” about Flynn had been obtained during the months-long investigation of Flynn .
The Department of Justice ( DOJ ) recently determined that an ambush FBI interview of Flynn , which later formed the foundation of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller ’ s single charge against Flynn , had no legal basis .
Contemporaneous handwritten notes from the FBI ’ s top counterintelligence official at the time show that the FBI ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was to “ prosecute him or get him fired.
” DOJ is currently in the process of dismissing all charges against Flynn , citing rank corruption and abuse of power in the FBI ’ s campaign against Flynn .
You can read the full email , including the newly declassified portions , here .

Michael Flynn was personally targeted during a crucial Jan. 5, 2017 Oval Office meeting arranged by then-President Barack Obama, a newly declassified document shows.
On Jan. 20, 2017, as President Donald Trump was being inaugurated, former White House National Security Adviser Susan Rice sent herself a bizarre email detailing the Jan. 5 meeting between her, Obama, then-Vice President Joe Biden, then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, and fired former Federal Bureau of Investigations Director James Comey. In the email, portions of which were not declassified until recently, Rice recorded that Flynn, who at the time was the incoming national security adviser for Trump, was personally discussed and targeted during the meeting with Obama.
Declassified Susan Rice E-M… by The Federalist on Scribd
“From a national security perspective, President Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia.” At the time, the Obama administration was actively spying on members of the Trump team as part of its Crossfire Hurricane investigation against Trump.
“Comey said he does have some concerns that incoming NSA Flynn is speaking frequently with Russian Ambassador Kislyak,” Rice wrote in a portion of the email that was only recently declassified. “Comey said that could be an issue as it relates to sharing sensitive information.”
“President Obama asked if Comey was saying the NSC should not pass sensitive information related to Russia to Flynn,” Rice continued. “Comey replied ‘potentially.'”
“[Comey] added that he has no indication thus far that Flynn has passed classified information to Kislyak, but he noted that ‘the level of communication is unusual.'” The email did not explain how it would be “unusual” for an incoming national security adviser to converse with foreign leaders ahead of a new president’s inauguration. Many observers believe the calls between Flynn and Kislyak were little more than pretext to hide the Obama administration’s spy campaign against Trump from the newly elected president’s team and to justify a continued inquisition against Flynn.
The newly declassified portions of the Jan. 5 Rice email confirm that the targeting of Flynn was coordinated within the inner sanctum of the White House and that both Obama and Biden were deeply involved in the campaign to take down Flynn.
Documents previously released and declassified showed that the FBI never possessed any evidence that Flynn was a secret Russian agent or that he had broken any laws. An FBI electronic communication closing the agency’s counterintelligence investigation against him, which was dated Jan. 4, made clear that “no derogatory information” about Flynn had been obtained during the months-long investigation of Flynn.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently determined that an ambush FBI interview of Flynn, which later formed the foundation of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s single charge against Flynn, had no legal basis. Contemporaneous handwritten notes from the FBI’s top counterintelligence official at the time show that the FBI’s goal in targeting Flynn in early 2017 was to “prosecute him or get him fired.” DOJ is currently in the process of dismissing all charges against Flynn, citing rank corruption and abuse of power in the FBI’s campaign against Flynn.
You can read the full email, including the newly declassified portions, here.


bonginoreport--2020-05-19--Jane Roe Said Conversion to Pro-Life Cause Was All an Act in Newly Released Footage

When Norma McCorvey , the anonymous plaintiff in the landmark Roe vs. Wade case , came out against abortion in 1995 , it stunned the world and represented a huge symbolic victory for abortion opponents : “ Jane Roe ” had gone to the other side .
For the remainder of her life , McCorvey worked to overturn the law that bore her name .
But it was all a lie , McCorvey says in a documentary filmed in the months before her death in 2017 , claiming she only did it because she was paid by antiabortion groups including @ @ @ @ @ @ @ big fish .
I think it was a mutual thing .
I took their money and they ’ d put me out in front of the cameras and tell me what to say .
That ’ s what I ’ d say , ” she says in “ AKA Jane Roe , ” which premieres Friday on FX .
“ It was all an act .
I did it well too .
I am a good actress.
” In what she describes as a “ deathbed confession , ” a visibly ailing McCorvey @ @ @ @ @ @ @ colorful terms : “ If a young woman wants to have an abortion , that ’ s no skin off my ass .
That ’ s why they call it choice.
” Arriving in an election year as the Supreme Court is considering a high-profile abortion case with the potential to undermine Roe vs. Wade and several states across the country have imposed so-called “ heartbeat laws ” effectively banning the procedure , “ AKA Jane Roe ” is likely to provoke strong emotions on both sides of this perennial front in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his goal was not necessarily to stir controversy , but to create a fully realized portrait of a flawed , fascinating woman who changed the course of American history but felt she was used as a pawn by both sides in the debate .
“ The focus of the film is Norma .
That ’ s what I really want people to take away from the film — who is this enigmatic person at the center of this very divisive issue , ” he says .
“ With an issue like this there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to reduce ‘ Jane Roe ’ to en emblem or a trophy , and behind that is a real person with a real story .
Norma was incredibly complex.
” Sweeney started making the film in April 2016 , frequently visiting McCorvey in Katy , Texas .
At first , he says , she was reticent , “ but when she realized I was not involved in the abortion debate she was very happy to open up.
” Over the course of the time they spent together , McCorvey recounted details of her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ neglect and a stint in reform school — turbulent personal life , including a short-lived teenage marriage , and a decades-long relationship with girlfriend Connie Gonzalez .
“ I thought she was extremely interesting and enigmatic .
I liked that her life was full of these fascinating contradictions , ” says Sweeney , who also interviewed figures on either side of the abortion issue who were close to McCorvey , including attorney Gloria Allred and Rob Schenck , an evangelical minister and former leader of Operation Rescue .
McCorvey comes across as funny @ @ @ @ @ @ @ broad performative streak .
She rattles off lines from “ Macbeth ” and jokes , “ I ’ m a very glamorous person — I can ’ t help it , it ’ s a gift.
” The documentary includes scenes of McCorvey on election night 2016 — a few months before she died of heart failure at age 69 — expressing her support for Hillary Clinton .
“ I wish I knew how many abortions Donald Trump was responsible for , ” McCorvey muses .
“ I ’ m sure he ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ count that high.
” “ She had a kind of sly wit , ” says Sweeney , recalling the many hours he spent with her in Katy , going on doughnut runs or sitting in a park , where she ’ d make him pick magnolia flowers .
But there is also great sadness , particularly surrounding her relationship with Gonzalez , which she renounced after her conversion in 1995 .
The film explores one of the great ironies of McCorvey ’ s life story : Although she helped make abortion legal , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ She was pregnant with her third child when , in 1970 , she signed an affidavit challenging laws in Texas which prohibited abortions except to save a mother ’ s life .
As an impoverished , uneducated woman lacking the means to travel out of state or obtain an illegal procedure , she was an ideal plaintiff for the lawyers who tried the case , Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee .
“ I know how I felt when I found out that I was pregnant and I wasn ’ t going to let @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , dirty and no good , ” McCorvey says in the film .
“ Women make mistakes , and they make mistakes with men , and things happen .
It ’ s just Mother Nature at work .
You can ’ t stop it .
You can ’ t explain it .
It ’ s just something that happens.
” But it would take three years before the Supreme Court would render a verdict , by which time McCorvey had long since given birth to a girl who was placed for adoption .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ placed for adoption ; her first child was raised by her mother . )
McCorvey remembers learning of the decision in the newspaper and receiving a phone call from Weddington saying they ’ d won .
“ Why would I be excited ?
I had a baby , but I gave her away .
It ’ s for all the women who come after me.
” “ AKA Jane Roe ” also shows how McCorvey was held at arm ’ s length by abortion rights proponents .
After a decade of anonymity , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ began granting interviews , and was depicted in the Emmy-winning TV movie , “ Roe vs. Wade , ” starring Holly Hunter .
But to the leaders of the abortion rights movement , the inconsistencies in her story — for a time McCorvey claimed she had gotten pregnant as the result of a rape , then said she had been lying — and lack of polish made her a less-than-ideal poster girl for the cause .
In 1995 , she was working at a Dallas abortion clinic that was targeted for demonstrations by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for extreme tactics such as blockading clinics ( the group is now known as Operation Save America ) .
She struck up an unlikely friendship with Flip Benham , an evangelical minister , who baptized her in a backyard pool , and for the next two decades of her life was a fixture at antiabortion protests and in documentaries .
In 1998 , she published a second memoir , “ Won by Love , ” detailing her change of heart on abortion .
As Benham recalls with evident pride in “ AKA Jane @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in demonstrations where he burned the LGBT flag and the Quran .
Despite her visible role in the fight against abortion , McCorvey says she was a mercenary , not a true believer .
And Schenck , who has also distanced himself from the antiabortion movement , at least partially corroborates the allegations , saying that she was paid out of concern “ that she would go back to the other side , ” he says in the film .
“ There were times I wondered : Is she playing us ?
And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ guts to say was , because I know damn well we were playing her.
” Schenck expresses regret at targeting McCorvey , someone whose vulnerabilities could be easily exploited , he says .
“ What we did with Norma was highly unethical .
The jig is up.
” Where : FX When : 9 p.m. Friday Rating : TV-MA ( may be unsuitable for children under the age of 17 )

When Norma McCorvey, the anonymous plaintiff in the landmark Roe vs. Wade case, came out against abortion in 1995, it stunned the world and represented a huge symbolic victory for abortion opponents: “Jane Roe” had gone to the other side. For the remainder of her life, McCorvey worked to overturn the law that bore her name.
But it was all a lie, McCorvey says in a documentary filmed in the months before her death in 2017, claiming she only did it because she was paid by antiabortion groups including Operation Rescue.
“I was the big fish. I think it was a mutual thing. I took their money and they’d put me out in front of the cameras and tell me what to say. That’s what I’d say,” she says in “AKA Jane Roe,” which premieres Friday on FX. “It was all an act. I did it well too. I am a good actress.”
In what she describes as a “deathbed confession,” a visibly ailing McCorvey restates her support for reproductive rights in colorful terms: “If a young woman wants to have an abortion, that’s no skin off my ass. That’s why they call it choice.”
Obituaries Norma McCorvey, once-anonymous plaintiff in landmark Roe vs. Wade abortion case, dies at 69 When Norma McCorvey revealed on Dallas television station in 1984 that she was the “Roe” in the landmark case that led the Supreme Court to legalize abortion, she called it “my law.”
Advertisement
Norma McCorvey in a scene from the FX documentary “AKA Jane Roe.” (FX)
Arriving in an election year as the Supreme Court is considering a high-profile abortion case with the potential to undermine Roe vs. Wade and several states across the country have imposed so-called “heartbeat laws” effectively banning the procedure, “AKA Jane Roe” is likely to provoke strong emotions on both sides of this perennial front in the culture wars.
Director Nick Sweeney says his goal was not necessarily to stir controversy, but to create a fully realized portrait of a flawed, fascinating woman who changed the course of American history but felt she was used as a pawn by both sides in the debate.
“The focus of the film is Norma. That’s what I really want people to take away from the film — who is this enigmatic person at the center of this very divisive issue,” he says. “With an issue like this there can be a temptation for different players to reduce ‘Jane Roe’ to en emblem or a trophy, and behind that is a real person with a real story. Norma was incredibly complex.”
Sweeney started making the film in April 2016, frequently visiting McCorvey in Katy, Texas. At first, he says, she was reticent, “but when she realized I was not involved in the abortion debate she was very happy to open up.” Over the course of the time they spent together, McCorvey recounted details of her difficult upbringing — marked by abuse, neglect and a stint in reform school — turbulent personal life, including a short-lived teenage marriage, and a decades-long relationship with girlfriend Connie Gonzalez.
“I thought she was extremely interesting and enigmatic. I liked that her life was full of these fascinating contradictions,” says Sweeney, who also interviewed figures on either side of the abortion issue who were close to McCorvey, including attorney Gloria Allred and Rob Schenck, an evangelical minister and former leader of Operation Rescue.
McCorvey comes across as funny, sharp and unfiltered, with a broad performative streak. She rattles off lines from “Macbeth” and jokes, “I’m a very glamorous person — I can’t help it, it’s a gift.”
Advertisement
The documentary includes scenes of McCorvey on election night 2016 — a few months before she died of heart failure at age 69 — expressing her support for Hillary Clinton. “I wish I knew how many abortions Donald Trump was responsible for,” McCorvey muses. “I’m sure he’s lost count, if he can count that high.”
“She had a kind of sly wit,” says Sweeney, recalling the many hours he spent with her in Katy, going on doughnut runs or sitting in a park, where she’d make him pick magnolia flowers.
But there is also great sadness, particularly surrounding her relationship with Gonzalez, which she renounced after her conversion in 1995.
Television Hillary Clinton knows sexism sways voters: ‘I got much more scrutiny’ than the men Hillary Clinton is more unvarnished than ever in “Hillary,” a new docuseries from director Nanette Burstein premiering March 6 on Hulu.
Norma McCorvey on a summer afternoon in Smithville, Texas. (Robert Daemmrich Photography Inc / Corbis)
The film explores one of the great ironies of McCorvey’s life story: Although she helped make abortion legal, McCorvey herself never had an abortion. She was pregnant with her third child when, in 1970, she signed an affidavit challenging laws in Texas which prohibited abortions except to save a mother’s life. As an impoverished, uneducated woman lacking the means to travel out of state or obtain an illegal procedure, she was an ideal plaintiff for the lawyers who tried the case, Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee.
“I know how I felt when I found out that I was pregnant and I wasn’t going to let another woman feel that way — cheap, dirty and no good,” McCorvey says in the film. “Women make mistakes, and they make mistakes with men, and things happen. It’s just Mother Nature at work. You can’t stop it. You can’t explain it. It’s just something that happens.”
But it would take three years before the Supreme Court would render a verdict, by which time McCorvey had long since given birth to a girl who was placed for adoption. (Her second child had also been placed for adoption; her first child was raised by her mother.) McCorvey remembers learning of the decision in the newspaper and receiving a phone call from Weddington saying they’d won. “Why would I be excited? I had a baby, but I gave her away. It’s for all the women who come after me.”
“AKA Jane Roe” also shows how McCorvey was held at arm’s length by abortion rights proponents. After a decade of anonymity, McCorvey went public in the 1980s and began granting interviews, and was depicted in the Emmy-winning TV movie, “Roe vs. Wade,” starring Holly Hunter. But to the leaders of the abortion rights movement, the inconsistencies in her story — for a time McCorvey claimed she had gotten pregnant as the result of a rape, then said she had been lying — and lack of polish made her a less-than-ideal poster girl for the cause.
In 1995, she was working at a Dallas abortion clinic that was targeted for demonstrations by Operation Rescue, a militant organization known for extreme tactics such as blockading clinics (the group is now known as Operation Save America). She struck up an unlikely friendship with Flip Benham, an evangelical minister, who baptized her in a backyard pool, and for the next two decades of her life was a fixture at antiabortion protests and in documentaries. In 1998, she published a second memoir, “Won by Love,” detailing her change of heart on abortion. As Benham recalls with evident pride in “AKA Jane Roe,” McCorvey also took part in demonstrations where he burned the LGBT flag and the Quran.
Despite her visible role in the fight against abortion, McCorvey says she was a mercenary, not a true believer. And Schenck, who has also distanced himself from the antiabortion movement, at least partially corroborates the allegations, saying that she was paid out of concern “that she would go back to the other side,” he says in the film. “There were times I wondered: Is she playing us? And what I didn’t have the guts to say was, because I know damn well we were playing her.”
Schenck expresses regret at targeting McCorvey, someone whose vulnerabilities could be easily exploited, he says. “What we did with Norma was highly unethical. The jig is up.”
‘AKA Jane Roe’
Where: FX
When: 9 p.m. Friday
Rating: TV-MA (may be unsuitable for children under the age of 17)


bonginoreport--2020-05-19--Biden’s “Quid Pro Quo” Call With Former Ukraine President Released

Never forget that it was President Donald Trump ’ s interest in alleged wrongdoing of Joe Biden and Hunter Biden in Ukraine that sparked the entire impeachment witch hunt Democrats were looking for an excuse to execute .
Democrats didn ’ t care about any potential wrongdoing on the part of the Bidens – they cared that Trump inquired about it .
Their case rested on an alleged “ quid pro quo ” between Trump and Ukraine ’ s President , which Ukraine ’ s President himself denied on multiple occasions .
That quid pro quo remains unproven , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ isn ’ t just speculation .
Ukrainian parliament member Andrii Derkach has released audio recordings purportedly revealing private conversations between former Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko and former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden .
In the audio posted to YouTube , the two discuss then-prosecutor Viktor Shokin ’ s resignation in exchange for $ 1 Billion in U.S. loan guarantees , as previously admitted by Joe Biden in a public interview ( below ) .
At the time , Shokin was probing Burisma , a Ukrainian energy company that employed Hunter Biden , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sit on its board .
In the audio , Poroshenko admits there was no evidence of wrongdoing by Prosecutor Shokin—but Biden insisted he be fired .
“ And I ’ m a man of my word , ” Biden says .
“ And now that the new Prosecutor General is in place , we ’ re ready to move forward to signing that one billion dollar loan guarantee.
” Listen to the full conversation below .
Note that as of writing , Breaking911 has not confirmed the audio ’ s authenticity .

Never forget that it was President Donald Trump’s interest in alleged wrongdoing of Joe Biden and Hunter Biden in Ukraine that sparked the entire impeachment witch hunt Democrats were looking for an excuse to execute. Democrats didn’t care about any potential wrongdoing on the part of the Bidens – they cared that Trump inquired about it.
Their case rested on an alleged “quid pro quo” between Trump and Ukraine’s President, which Ukraine’s President himself denied on multiple occasions.
That quid pro quo remains unproven, but a certain “quid pro Joe” isn’t just speculation.
As reported by Breaking911:
Ukrainian parliament member Andrii Derkach has released audio recordings purportedly revealing private conversations between former Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko and former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden. In the audio posted to YouTube, the two discuss then-prosecutor Viktor Shokin’s resignation in exchange for $1 Billion in U.S. loan guarantees, as previously admitted by Joe Biden in a public interview (below).
At the time, Shokin was probing Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company that employed Hunter Biden, the Vice President’s son, to sit on its board. In the audio, Poroshenko admits there was no evidence of wrongdoing by Prosecutor Shokin—but Biden insisted he be fired. “And I’m a man of my word,” Biden says. “And now that the new Prosecutor General is in place, we’re ready to move forward to signing that one billion dollar loan guarantee.”
Listen to the full conversation below. Note that as of writing, Breaking911 has not confirmed the audio’s authenticity.


bonginoreport--2020-05-19--Libs Turn on Harry Potter Author for Her Alleged “Extreme Anti-Transgender Rhetoric”

Although the “ Harry Potter ” series was once considered holy text by the anti-Donald Trump “ resistance , ” its author , J.K. Rowling , has been under fire by progressives for her “ trans-exclusive ” language and for her sins against modern gender theory .
Back in December , Rowling was “ canceled ” online for daring to note that biological sex “ is real ” and coming to the defense of university professor Maya Forstater , who was stripped of her job after “ tweeting that a person can not change their biological sex , ” The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Now , Rowling is in trouble again after she “ liked ” a tweet about a Welsh trans woman whom a writer referred to as “ an adult human male who claims to be a lesbian.
” LGBTQ Nation reports that Rowling liked a tweet by “ anti-transgender activist Fred Sargeant , ” a writer who objects to the idea that anyone can somehow change their biological sex , and believes that male-to-female transgender individuals can not be “ oppressed ” because they are born biologically male and made a choice to exit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ transgender activist named Alex Drummond and described Drummond ’ s lack of biological transition in great detail , adding that Drummond , who considers themselves a woman attracted to other women ( so , technically , a lesbian ) , “ believes that real lesbians who aren ’ t into penises are transphobic and should be excluded from the lesbian community.
” Sargeant later crowed that the tweet had received a “ like ” from Rowling , setting off the progressive social media chorus .
Rowling , many progressives and gender activists believe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ trans-exclusionary radical feminist ” — a brand of activist that has cropped up more in Europe than in the United States , but which fights back against the idea that gender is fluid or non-existent , a theory they believe to be a threat to the crusade for women ’ s rights .
If gender is merely a “ social construct , ” then the goals of feminism are and were imaginary and feminists ’ achievements were in vain .
Back in December , in support of Maya Forstater , Rowling tweeted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Call yourself whatever you like .
Sleep with any consenting adult who ’ ll have you .
Live your best life in peace and security .
But force women out of their jobs for stating that sex is real ?
# IStandWithMaya # ThisIsNotADrill ” Rowling was quickly derided as a bigot , and legions of Harry Potter fans took to Twitter to excoriate Rowling for her personal beliefs ( though it ’ s not entirely clear what Rowling ’ s personal beliefs actually are , given that she ’ s never called @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out directly on the subject of gender ) .
Some even called for a boycott of the Harry Potter books .
Celebrities who made the mistake of “ liking ” Rowling ’ s offending tweet were even , themselves , made to apologize .
Rowling has not issued a statement on the subject .
In the past , her publicist has said that Rowling “ likes ” things on Twitter by mistake .
The Daily Wire , headed by bestselling author and popular podcast host Ben Shapiro , is a leading provider of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media ’ s rhetoric to provide readers the most important , relevant , and engaging stories of the day .
Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a member .

Although the “Harry Potter” series was once considered holy text by the anti-Donald Trump “resistance,” its author, J.K. Rowling, has been under fire by progressives for her “trans-exclusive” language and for her sins against modern gender theory.
Back in December, Rowling was “canceled” online for daring to note that biological sex “is real” and coming to the defense of university professor Maya Forstater, who was stripped of her job after “tweeting that a person cannot change their biological sex,” The Daily Wire reported at the time.
Now, Rowling is in trouble again after she “liked” a tweet about a Welsh trans woman whom a writer referred to as “an adult human male who claims to be a lesbian.”
LGBTQ Nation reports that Rowling liked a tweet by “anti-transgender activist Fred Sargeant,” a writer who objects to the idea that anyone can somehow change their biological sex, and believes that male-to-female transgender individuals cannot be “oppressed” because they are born biologically male and made a choice to exit the Patriarchy.
Sargeant tweeted about a transgender activist named Alex Drummond and described Drummond’s lack of biological transition in great detail, adding that Drummond, who considers themselves a woman attracted to other women (so, technically, a lesbian), “believes that real lesbians who aren’t into penises are transphobic and should be excluded from the lesbian community.”
Sargeant later crowed that the tweet had received a “like” from Rowling, setting off the progressive social media chorus.
Rowling, many progressives and gender activists believe, is a “TERF” or “trans-exclusionary radical feminist” — a brand of activist that has cropped up more in Europe than in the United States, but which fights back against the idea that gender is fluid or non-existent, a theory they believe to be a threat to the crusade for women’s rights. If gender is merely a “social construct,” then the goals of feminism are and were imaginary and feminists’ achievements were in vain.
Back in December, in support of Maya Forstater, Rowling tweeted, “Dress however you please. Call yourself whatever you like. Sleep with any consenting adult who’ll have you. Live your best life in peace and security. But force women out of their jobs for stating that sex is real? #IStandWithMaya #ThisIsNotADrill”
Rowling was quickly derided as a bigot, and legions of Harry Potter fans took to Twitter to excoriate Rowling for her personal beliefs (though it’s not entirely clear what Rowling’s personal beliefs actually are, given that she’s never called herself a “TERF” or spoken out directly on the subject of gender). Some even called for a boycott of the Harry Potter books. Celebrities who made the mistake of “liking” Rowling’s offending tweet were even, themselves, made to apologize.
Rowling has not issued a statement on the subject. In the past, her publicist has said that Rowling “likes” things on Twitter by mistake.
The Daily Wire, headed by bestselling author and popular podcast host Ben Shapiro, is a leading provider of conservative news, cutting through the mainstream media’s rhetoric to provide readers the most important, relevant, and engaging stories of the day. Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a member.


bonginoreport--2020-05-19--New Jersey Gym Warned by Governor Opens for Second Day

BELLMAWR , NJ — A South Jersey gym that made national headlines when it reopened in violation of the governor 's executive order Monday reopened again Tuesday morning .
And for the second straight day , the owners were issued a citation for reopening , according to the Bellmawr Police Department .
A gym member was also arrested as he left Atilis Gym in Bellmawr , and other members were warned they could be ticketed if they did n't peacefully disperse .
The owners were charged with a violation of Gov .
Phil Murphy 's executive order , Bellmawr Police @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The police department had no further comment on the gathering .
Calls to the gym by Patch on Tuesday morning were met with a busy signal .
News 12 posted footage on Twitter of the gym member 's arrest as he was leaving the gym Tuesday afternoon .
New Jersey Coronavirus Updates : Do n't miss local and statewide announcements about novel coronavirus precautions .
Sign up for Patch alerts and daily newsletters .
That gym member returned to the parking lot a short time later , saying he was handcuffed after he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
He told reporters he was issued citations for violating the executive order and obstruction .
The owners have warned members they could be arrested if they do n't identify themselves to police as they leave the gym , according to The Philadelphia Inquirer .
Owner Frank Trumbetti had previously told members to `` prepare to be arrested , '' according to Fox 29 .
The Law Offices of Jef Henniger has offered to represent for free gym members at Atilis Gym who get arrested in connection with violating the governor 's executive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one arrest was made today at Atilis Gym , '' the law office said in a statement .
`` We continue to stand by to assist gym employees or members that get arrested today .
If any protesters get arrested or cited , we can discuss the case with them as well .
There is no need for a GoFundMe page because if we take the case , it will be pro bono .
We will not take any money from anyone that was arrested today .
We will either accept the case @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hope to be able to accept as many people as possible if there are multiple arrests . ''
Speaking during a Tuesday afternoon news conference , Col. Patrick J. Callahan , superintendent of the New Jersey State Police , said the Bellmawr Police Department and the Camden County Prosecutor 's Office are looking into additional charges against patrons .
`` Prosecutors offices and local law enforcement are the first lines of attack , '' Murphy said during the news conference , adding that the state was not `` there yet '' on reopening @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it 's close , physical activity .
We 're concerned about it . ''
Callahan said the state has been fairly even-handed across the board when it comes to businesses violating the executive order .
Barbershops , massage parlors and other businesses have all been cited multiple times before eventually being shut down .
The owners could be fined up to $ 2,000 , but owners Ian Smith and Trumbetti told 6ABC they plan to take the matter to court .
An online fundraiser was also launched to help the gym raise money @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It had raised over $ 24,000 as of Tuesday afternoon .
According to NBC 10 , police also told the crowd they were in violation of the governor 's order and were told to get in their cars .
Smith and Trumbetti urged the crowd to listen to police , saying they are not the enemy .
The scene and the aftermath were captured by NBC 10 .
After being issued the citation , Trumbetti told the news station , `` I will not close my doors again unless I am behind bars @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I guarantee you this door will be open every single day . ''
Here is how the scene was portrayed by various media outlets : On Tuesday , the owners were issued a disorderly persons summons for violating the portion of Murphy 's stay-at-home order that states all recreation and entertainment businesses must remain closed as long as the order is in effect , police said .
The order was issued in March in an attempt to stem the spread of the coronavirus .
Members were given warnings , but Murphy said they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ returned on Tuesday .
It was not immediately clear what the governor meant .
Read more here : Gov .
Murphy Warns Gym After It Reopens , Defying NJ Orders After being issued the summons , Trumbetti told nj.com , `` I 'm not worried about jail . ''
He said the owners made a conscious decision to fight for the cause for everybody .
Camden County Freeholder Louis Cappelli Jr. has weighed in on the reopening of the gym , located in his county .
`` Arbitrarily opening a nonessential business is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
`` Having rallies with congregations of people close together without masks is putting people at risk to spread the virus .
These capricious actions undermine the work we have all done and the progress we have made over the last two months . ''
He acknowledged the incident has raised some good points as it relates to reopening businesses .
`` There have been insightful ideas about progress with social distancing and protections that could be put in place for individual business owners to assimilate into the new normal we live in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to advocate these ideas , '' Cappelli said .
The gym 's mission first became known last week when Smith told Tucker Carlson on Fox News that he would defy the governor 's orders .
If the state shut his gym down , he said , he would just reopen .
Read more here : South Jersey Gym To Reopen In Defiance Of Coronavirus Orders The owners announced the gym would reopen and follow social distancing guidelines and safety precautions , including taking the temperatures of members who wished to enter and denying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 100.4 or higher .
Capacity would also be limited to 44 people at a time .
Monday 's reopening drew a large crowd that broke out into chants throughout the gathering .
Protesters wore shirts calling Murphy a `` tyrant , '' while a sign that appeared to be set up by the owners outside the gym read , `` Let 's work together Mr. Murphy .
Together we can do this . ''
Read more : South Jersey Gym Reopens In Defiance Of Gov , Murphy 's Orders Later , a Bellmawr @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crowd that gathered to support the gym .
He did n't mention any summons that had been issued when he spoke just before 11 a.m. '' We are , and we 're only here for everybody 's safety today , '' the officer said .
`` We planned for the worst , hoped for the best , and it seems like that 's what we have out here today .
Formally , you are all in violation of the executive order .
`` On that note , have a good day , everybody @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Bellmawr police have not publicly addressed the incident .
Bellmawr Mayor Charles J. Sauter III told the Philadelphia Inquirer he was `` proud of the manner in which the Bellmawr Police Department conducted themselves this morning , as well as the respect shown toward our police officers by the general public . ''
Patch will update this breaking news story as more information becomes available .
Read more : NJ Coronavirus Updates : Here 's What You Need To Know

Business NJ Gym Warned By Gov. Murphy Reopens For 2nd Day; 1 Arrested Member arrested: Atilis Gym reopened for a second straight day after it received a summons for violating the governor's executive order. Replies (135)
A police officer issues Atilis Gym co-owners Ian Smith (left) and Frank Trumbetti a summons Tuesday outside outside their gym in Bellmawr, N.J. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke) Atilis Gym owners Ian Smith and Frank Trumbetti were cited for a second day in a row for opening in violation of the governor's orders. (Image via Mark Doyle, used with permission) Atili's Gym in Bellmawr reopened again Tuesday morning after being issued a summons for reopening Monday morning. (Image via Mark Doyle, used with permission) Atilis Gym in Bellmawr reopened again Tuesday morning after being issued a summons for reopening Monday morning. (Image via Mark Doyle, used with permission) Atilis Gym in Bellmawr reopened again Tuesday morning after being issued a summons for reopening Monday morning. (Image via Mark Doyle, used with permission) Atilis Gym in Bellmawr reopened again Tuesday morning after being issued a summons for reopening Monday morning. (Image via Mark Doyle, used with permission)
UPDATE: Atilis Gym reopened for a third straight day at 8 a.m. Wednesday. The crowd is reportedly smaller than it was on Tuesday. Read more here: NJ Gym Reportedly Opens For Third Straight Day Despite Murphy Warnings
BELLMAWR, NJ — A South Jersey gym that made national headlines when it reopened in violation of the governor's executive order Monday reopened again Tuesday morning. And for the second straight day, the owners were issued a citation for reopening, according to the Bellmawr Police Department. A gym member was also arrested as he left Atilis Gym in Bellmawr, and other members were warned they could be ticketed if they didn't peacefully disperse.
The owners were charged with a violation of Gov. Phil Murphy's executive order, Bellmawr Police Chief William Walsh said Tuesday morning. The police department had no further comment on the gathering. Calls to the gym by Patch on Tuesday morning were met with a busy signal. News 12 posted footage on Twitter of the gym member's arrest as he was leaving the gym Tuesday afternoon.
BREAKING: One member arrested, 3 others stopped as they left @TheAtilisGym. We're told by the owners the man who was taken by police refused to give his name. Owners say they're warning their members before they enter every day that this is a possibility.@News12NJ pic.twitter.com/R1w3BnKogH
— Erika Shych (@erikashych) May 19, 2020 New Jersey Coronavirus Updates: Don't miss local and statewide announcements about novel coronavirus precautions. Sign up for Patch alerts and daily newsletters.
That gym member returned to the parking lot a short time later, saying he was handcuffed after he refused to give his name to police. He told reporters he was issued citations for violating the executive order and obstruction.
The owners have warned members they could be arrested if they don't identify themselves to police as they leave the gym, according to The Philadelphia Inquirer. Owner Frank Trumbetti had previously told members to "prepare to be arrested," according to Fox 29.
UPDATE: man who was arrested was released & has returned to the parking lot. Said he was taken to the police station and given two citations for breaking the gov’s orders and obstruction. “I asked them why they needed my name and the next thing I knew they were handcuffing me.” pic.twitter.com/91TOIvzzOG
— Ellie Rushing (@EllieRushing) May 19, 2020 The Law Offices of Jef Henniger has offered to represent for free gym members at Atilis Gym who get arrested in connection with violating the governor's executive order. "Unfortunately, at least one arrest was made today at Atilis Gym," the law office said in a statement. "We continue to stand by to assist gym employees or members that get arrested today. If any protesters get arrested or cited, we can discuss the case with them as well. There is no need for a GoFundMe page because if we take the case, it will be pro bono. We will not take any money from anyone that was arrested today. We will either accept the case or we won't, although we hope to be able to accept as many people as possible if there are multiple arrests." Speaking during a Tuesday afternoon news conference, Col. Patrick J. Callahan, superintendent of the New Jersey State Police, said the Bellmawr Police Department and the Camden County Prosecutor's Office are looking into additional charges against patrons. "Prosecutors offices and local law enforcement are the first lines of attack," Murphy said during the news conference, adding that the state was not "there yet" on reopening gyms. "It's indoors, it's close, physical activity. We're concerned about it."
Callahan said the state has been fairly even-handed across the board when it comes to businesses violating the executive order. Barbershops, massage parlors and other businesses have all been cited multiple times before eventually being shut down.
The owners could be fined up to $2,000, but owners Ian Smith and Trumbetti told 6ABC they plan to take the matter to court. An online fundraiser was also launched to help the gym raise money to pay for its court costs. It had raised over $24,000 as of Tuesday afternoon. According to NBC 10, police also told the crowd they were in violation of the governor's order and were told to get in their cars. Smith and Trumbetti urged the crowd to listen to police, saying they are not the enemy. The scene and the aftermath were captured by NBC 10. Police issued @TheAtilisGym another citation today for breaking governors orders and opening. Officers were met by yelling from the crowd of supporters outsideCa the gym. @NBCPhiladelphia pic.twitter.com/DztLJMHToT
— Miguel Martinez-Valle (@MiguelMValle) May 19, 2020 Police warned crowd they cant gather and have to return to their car. Gym owner just asked supporters to listen to police. “They are not our enemy” @NBCPhiladelphia pic.twitter.com/8sEHa8rXbh
— Miguel Martinez-Valle (@MiguelMValle) May 19, 2020 After being issued the citation, Trumbetti told the news station, "I will not close my doors again unless I am behind bars and unable to unlock the door. I guarantee you this door will be open every single day." Here is how the scene was portrayed by various media outlets:
He acknowledged the incident has raised some good points as it relates to reopening businesses. "There have been insightful ideas about progress with social distancing and protections that could be put in place for individual business owners to assimilate into the new normal we live in, but ultimately this is no way to advocate these ideas," Cappelli said. The gym's mission first became known last week when Smith told Tucker Carlson on Fox News that he would defy the governor's orders. If the state shut his gym down, he said, he would just reopen. Read more here: South Jersey Gym To Reopen In Defiance Of Coronavirus Orders
The owners announced the gym would reopen and follow social distancing guidelines and safety precautions, including taking the temperatures of members who wished to enter and denying access to anyone with a fever of 100.4 or higher. Capacity would also be limited to 44 people at a time. Monday's reopening drew a large crowd that broke out into chants throughout the gathering. Protesters wore shirts calling Murphy a "tyrant," while a sign that appeared to be set up by the owners outside the gym read, "Let's work together Mr. Murphy. Together we can do this."
Read more: South Jersey Gym Reopens In Defiance Of Gov, Murphy's Orders
Later, a Bellmawr police officer drew cheers from the large crowd that gathered to support the gym. He didn't mention any summons that had been issued when he spoke just before 11 a.m. "We are, and we're only here for everybody's safety today," the officer said. "We planned for the worst, hoped for the best, and it seems like that's what we have out here today. Formally, you are all in violation of the executive order.
"On that note, have a good day, everybody be safe," the officer said. Bellmawr police have not publicly addressed the incident. Bellmawr Mayor Charles J. Sauter III told the Philadelphia Inquirer he was "proud of the manner in which the Bellmawr Police Department conducted themselves this morning, as well as the respect shown toward our police officers by the general public."


bonginoreport--2020-05-19--Kayleigh McEnany Mocks Media Hysteria After Trump Says He’s Taking Hydroxychloroquine

White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany ripped cable news outlets for their coverage of hydroxychloroquine after the president revealed he 's been taking the medication .
President Trump has repeatedly touted the anti-malarial medication despite it having no proven or substantial evidence of preventing or treating the coronavirus .
While some of the medical experts working with the White House have pushed back on the president 's promotion of the drug , Trump announced Monday that he has been taking it .
Following the president 's revelation , many cable news outlets , Fox News included , ran segments cautioning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ drug .
McEnany ridiculed the ensuing covering and provided additional information on Trump 's announcement during a Tuesday interview on Fox & Friends .
`` The president just wanted to be transparent about his personal health decision that he made in consultation with his doctor , and one of the things that I really want to get out there this morning , that unfortunately there ’ s a lot of misinformation about is , you know , first : Let me emphasize strongly that any use of hydroxychloroquine has to be in consultation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
`` Some of the misreporting on other networks , these apoplectic analyses of hydroxychloroquine , ignore the fact that tens of millions of people around the world have used this drug for other purposes , including some people in my communications office who used it for malaria prophylaxis before traveling to other parts of the world , '' McEnany said .
The press secretary declined to comment on whether the president started taking the drug because two White House aides tested positive for the coronavirus .
The White House physician said he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from treatment outweighed the relative risks '' and acknowledged the COVID-19 outbreak in the administration .

White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany ripped cable news outlets for their coverage of hydroxychloroquine after the president revealed he's been taking the medication.
President Trump has repeatedly touted the anti-malarial medication despite it having no proven or substantial evidence of preventing or treating the coronavirus. While some of the medical experts working with the White House have pushed back on the president's promotion of the drug, Trump announced Monday that he has been taking it.
Following the president's revelation, many cable news outlets, Fox News included, ran segments cautioning viewers about the potential dangers of the drug. McEnany ridiculed the ensuing coverage and provided additional information on Trump's announcement during a Tuesday interview on Fox & Friends.
"The president just wanted to be transparent about his personal health decision that he made in consultation with his doctor, and one of the things that I really want to get out there this morning, that unfortunately there’s a lot of misinformation about is, you know, first: Let me emphasize strongly that any use of hydroxychloroquine has to be in consultation with your doctor," she began.
"Some of the misreporting on other networks, these apoplectic analyses of hydroxychloroquine, ignore the fact that tens of millions of people around the world have used this drug for other purposes, including some people in my communications office who used it for malaria prophylaxis before traveling to other parts of the world," McEnany said.
The press secretary declined to comment on whether the president started taking the drug because two White House aides tested positive for the coronavirus. The White House physician said he and Trump decided the "potential benefit from treatment outweighed the relative risks" and acknowledged the COVID-19 outbreak in the administration.


bonginoreport--2020-05-19--Inside the Left’s Agenda to Destroy America’s Middle Class

Many claim that the Democrats want open borders to import millions of new voters who will likely vote for Democrats .
Undeniably this is an accurate statement but only partially addresses the strategy behind the Democrats ’ push for open borders and an end to immigration law enforcement as optimized by the creation of “ Sanctuary Cities ” and Sanctuary States and immigration mayhem that ensues .
Today ’ s Democrats bear no resemblance to the Democrats of the past .
Today ’ s Radical Democrats are hell-bent on seizing permanent political power at the expense of America and Americans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ addressed their concerns while Republicans backed up business owners ’ goals of fewer regulations and greater profits .
This balance made sense and helped Americans and America to prosper .
My dad used to say that the easiest way to turn capitalists into communists is to take away their money .
Flooding America with millions of Third World workers who bring Third World expectations of Third World wages and working conditions results in the loss of jobs by millions of American and lawful immigrant workers and the suppression of wages for all workers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of housing increases as more foreigners come to the United States and seek housing .
The increased demand for apartments drives up the price of housing even as jobs are lost and wages fail to keep up with increased costs of housing .
As more Americans lose their jobs and the ability to support themselves and their families- even if they don ’ t lose their jobs , they will be drawn to the Democratic Party candidates who offer to provide Americans and aliens alike with economic assistance that they desperately need to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2020 news report published by PJ Media , Democrats ' $ 3 Trillion Bill Would Include a Massive Gift ... to Communist China .
There are many elements of the proposed emergency funding bill concocted by Nancy “ Let them eat ice cream ” Pelosi and her fellow travelers of the Radical Democratic Party that have absolutely nothing to do with assisting struggling Americans and small businesses that were ordered shuttered because of the Coronavirus Pandemic that has sickened millions and has killed an estimated 80,000 Americans , thus far .
One of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has been ignored by the media that is addressed by PJ Media .
Here is the relevant excerpt : Consider that the afore-noted Buy American Act was enacted by a traditional Democrat , President FDR who acted to protect American jobs and manufacturing the year after the Stock Market cratered on July 8 , 1932 and stocks hit their lowest point .
Roosevelt also ramped up immigration law enforcement to protect jobs for American workers .
The Buy American Act requires that the federal government must prioritize the purchase of supplies from American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are available .
This is commonsense and helps America and Americans .
Yet during the current crisis the Democrats want to eliminate this requirement that protects American jobs that has been on the books for nearly 90 years .
They are exploiting the pandemic crisis as a means for pressuring the Republicans and the President into ending this important long-standing law .
I doubt that any so-called journalists will even report on this major betrayal , let alone ask Pelosi or any other Democrat about why they included this provision in their proposed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seek to destroy more jobs Americans desperately need , especially in this post coronavirus era where tens of millions of Americans fear that they will have lost their jobs permanently when the U.S. economy slowly reopens .
Their proposed legislation would also provide amnesty to illegal aliens declaring aliens working illegally in the United States as “ Essential Workers ” even as many Americans have been kept from working because purportedly their jobs are un-essential !
If the Democrats were truly concerned about the plight of American and lawful immigrant workers and their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ law enforcement and suggest that for the meanwhile Americans should be able to take “ essential jobs ” to help them get through this unparalleled crisis .
Remember the Democrats ’ mantra , “ Never let a crisis go to waste.
” This crisis has emboldened Radical Democrat ’ s to push an agenda that destroys the American middle class to propel more Americans into homelessness and dependency on the Democrats .
Indeed , the Democrats continue to push for passage of “ Comprehensive Immigration Reform ” a legislative disaster I have come @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Act .
On Sunday May 17 , 2020 New York ’ s Mayor Bill de Blasio was interviewed on Fox News by Maria Bartiromo .
Fox posted the video under the title , Mayor de Blasio : New York City will likely see more revenue losses without a stimulus .
During the interview de Blasio referred to the supposed “ 12 million undocumented folks ” to describe the population of illegal aliens which has been estimated to be nearly double that number .
That number , however , is only the tip of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ everyone of those millions of illegal aliens would have the absolute and immediate right to bring in each and everyone of their minor children and their spouses as lawful immigrants .
Third World countries have many , many children .
It is not uncommon for such families to have more than six children each .
Additionally aliens could claim to have fathered children with women who are not their spouses .
It is entirely possible that each legalized alien could , on average , petition for more than three children each , considering @ @ @ @ @ @ @ children , don ’ t want them here or already brought them to the United States .
If , for the sake of argument , 25 million illegal aliens were given lawful status- and that number could be much , much larger , we could wind up with more than 75 million minor children being brought legally to the United States by this ill-conceived program , along with their other parent .
In other words , Comprehensive Immigration Reform could enable more than 100 million new immigrants to legally come to the United @ @ @ @ @ @ @ impact that tens of millions of children this would have on our schools , hospitals , mass transit , the power grid and other elements of critical infrastructure .
The cost of housing would climb still higher leading to more poverty , more homelessness and more crime .
When those tens of millions of immigrant children become adults they will flood the over-flowing labor pool .
Finally , if our political leaders would be sufficiently corrupt and stupid to provide an unknown number of illegal aliens with lawful status , there would be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ illegal aliens who either entered the United States without inspection and/or violated multiple immigration laws after entering the United States .
There would be no way to conduct field investigations to verify the claims made in their application and to identify fraud .
Immigration fraud was identified by the 9/11 Commission , to which I provided testimony , as the key method of entry and embedding for terrorists .
This is why I have also come to refer to Comprehensive Immigration Reform by another name , the “ Terrorist Assistance and Facilitation Act @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I wrote for the Washington Times Immigration bill a 'No Go ' and that was quoted by then-Senator Jeff Sessions when he persuaded members of the U.S. Senate to vote down that terrible bill in 2007 .
I also used that descriptive title in my responses to written questions from Senator Chuck Grassley when I testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing on March 20 2013 on the topic Building An Immigration System Worthy Of American Values .
Decent Americans are horrified by the growing number of homeless Americans .
The immoral Radical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their strategy to force Americans to trade their freedoms for food , shelter and other necessities is working .
For Radical Democrats , winning isn ’ t everything- it is the only thing !

Many claim that the Democrats want open borders to import millions of new voters who will likely vote for Democrats.
Undeniably this is an accurate statement but only partially addresses the strategy behind the Democrats’ push for open borders and an end to immigration law enforcement as optimized by the creation of “Sanctuary Cities” and Sanctuary States and immigration mayhem that ensues.
Today’s Democrats bear no resemblance to the Democrats of the past. Today’s Radical Democrats are hell-bent on seizing permanent political power at the expense of America and Americans.
Traditional Democrats supported American workers and addressed their concerns while Republicans backed up business owners’ goals of fewer regulations and greater profits. This balance made sense and helped Americans and America to prosper.
My dad used to say that the easiest way to turn capitalists into communists is to take away their money. Flooding America with millions of Third World workers who bring Third World expectations of Third World wages and working conditions results in the loss of jobs by millions of American and lawful immigrant workers and the suppression of wages for all workers.
Homeless rates soar as the cost of housing increases as more foreigners come to the United States and seek housing. The increased demand for apartments drives up the price of housing even as jobs are lost and wages fail to keep up with increased costs of housing.
As more Americans lose their jobs and the ability to support themselves and their families- even if they don’t lose their jobs, they will be drawn to the Democratic Party candidates who offer to provide Americans and aliens alike with economic assistance that they desperately need to survive.
Consider the May 12, 2020 news report published by PJ Media, Democrats’ $3 Trillion Bill Would Include a Massive Gift…to Communist China.
There are many elements of the proposed emergency funding bill concocted by Nancy “Let them eat ice cream” Pelosi and her fellow travelers of the Radical Democratic Party that have absolutely nothing to do with assisting struggling Americans and small businesses that were ordered shuttered because of the Coronavirus Pandemic that has sickened millions and has killed an estimated 80,000 Americans, thus far. One of the most egregious components of this bill has been ignored by the media that is addressed by PJ Media.
Here is the relevant excerpt:
They’ve also prioritized China’s economy in this one. The bill includes a provision that waives Chapter 83 of title 41, United States Code. What’s that? Chapter 83 of title 41, United States Code, shall not apply with respect to purchases made in response to the emergency declared by the President on March 13, 2020, under section 501 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5191) and under any subsequent major disaster declaration under section 401 of such Act that supersedes such emergency declaration. Chapter 83 of Title 41, United States Code is none other than the Buy American Act. That 1933 law prioritizes American manufacturers over others when the government makes purchases. The Trump administration strengthened the Buy American act last year. The Democrats’ bill would waive it permanently, allowing the government to purchase more goods from overseas, unrestricted.
Consider that the afore-noted Buy American Act was enacted by a traditional Democrat, President FDR who acted to protect American jobs and manufacturing the year after the Stock Market cratered on July 8, 1932 and stocks hit their lowest point. Roosevelt also ramped up immigration law enforcement to protect jobs for American workers.
The Buy American Act requires that the federal government must prioritize the purchase of supplies from American companies when such made in America supplies are available.
This is commonsense and helps America and Americans.
Yet during the current crisis the Democrats want to eliminate this requirement that protects American jobs that has been on the books for nearly 90 years. They are exploiting the pandemic crisis as a means for pressuring the Republicans and the President into ending this important long-standing law.
I doubt that any so-called journalists will even report on this major betrayal, let alone ask Pelosi or any other Democrat about why they included this provision in their proposed legislation.
It is clear that they seek to destroy more jobs Americans desperately need, especially in this post coronavirus era where tens of millions of Americans fear that they will have lost their jobs permanently when the U.S. economy slowly reopens.
Their proposed legislation would also provide amnesty to illegal aliens declaring aliens working illegally in the United States as “Essential Workers” even as many Americans have been kept from working because purportedly their jobs are un-essential!
If the Democrats were truly concerned about the plight of American and lawful immigrant workers and their struggling families, they should favor immigration law enforcement and suggest that for the meanwhile Americans should be able to take “essential jobs” to help them get through this unparalleled crisis.
Remember the Democrats’ mantra, “Never let a crisis go to waste.”
This crisis has emboldened Radical Democrat’s to push an agenda that destroys the American middle class to propel more Americans into homelessness and dependency on the Democrats.
Indeed, the Democrats continue to push for passage of “Comprehensive Immigration Reform” a legislative disaster I have come to refer to as the Overwhelm America Act.
On Sunday May 17, 2020 New York’s Mayor Bill de Blasio was interviewed on Fox News by Maria Bartiromo. Fox posted the video under the title, Mayor de Blasio: New York City will likely see more revenue losses without a stimulus.
During the interview de Blasio referred to the supposed “12 million undocumented folks” to describe the population of illegal aliens which has been estimated to be nearly double that number. That number, however, is only the tip of the proverbial iceberg.
If legalized, everyone of those millions of illegal aliens would have the absolute and immediate right to bring in each and everyone of their minor children and their spouses as lawful immigrants. Third World countries have many, many children.
It is not uncommon for such families to have more than six children each. Additionally aliens could claim to have fathered children with women who are not their spouses. It is entirely possible that each legalized alien could, on average, petition for more than three children each, considering that some aliens might not have minor children, don’t want them here or already brought them to the United States.
If, for the sake of argument, 25 million illegal aliens were given lawful status- and that number could be much, much larger, we could wind up with more than 75 million minor children being brought legally to the United States by this ill-conceived program, along with their other parent.
In other words, Comprehensive Immigration Reform could enable more than 100 million new immigrants to legally come to the United States, literally overnight!
Imagine the impact that tens of millions of children this would have on our schools, hospitals, mass transit, the power grid and other elements of critical infrastructure. The cost of housing would climb still higher leading to more poverty, more homelessness and more crime.
When those tens of millions of immigrant children become adults they will flood the over-flowing labor pool.
Finally, if our political leaders would be sufficiently corrupt and stupid to provide an unknown number of illegal aliens with lawful status, there would be no way to interview these millions of illegal aliens who either entered the United States without inspection and/or violated multiple immigration laws after entering the United States. There would be no way to conduct field investigations to verify the claims made in their application and to identify fraud.
Immigration fraud was identified by the 9/11 Commission, to which I provided testimony, as the key method of entry and embedding for terrorists.
This is why I have also come to refer to Comprehensive Immigration Reform by another name, the “Terrorist Assistance and Facilitation Act” as I noted in an Op-Ed I wrote for the Washington Times Immigration bill a ‘No Go’ and that was quoted by then-Senator Jeff Sessions when he persuaded members of the U.S. Senate to vote down that terrible bill in 2007.
I also used that descriptive title in my responses to written questions from Senator Chuck Grassley when I testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing on March 20 2013 on the topic Building An Immigration System Worthy Of American Values.
Decent Americans are horrified by the growing number of homeless Americans. The immoral Radical Democrats, however, are encouraged that their strategy to force Americans to trade their freedoms for food, shelter and other necessities is working.
For Radical Democrats, winning isn’t everything- it is the only thing!


bonginoreport--2020-05-19--Trump Taking “Historic” Action to Bring Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Back to the U.S. From China

In an “ historic turning point , ” the Trump administration has taken bold action to bring America ’ s pharmaceutical manufacturing back to the U.S. from China and India .
“ Seeking to secure the nation ’ s supply of critical medications , the Trump administration has signed a $ 354 million contract that would create the nation ’ s first strategic stockpile of key ingredients needed to make medicines , ” NBC News reported .
“ The agreement was signed Monday with Phlow Corp. , a generic drug maker based in Virginia.
” White House Trade Adviser Peter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is the mastermind behind President Donald Trump ’ s trade war with the communist nation , said that the move “ will not only help bring our essential medicines home but actually do so in a way that is cost competitive with the sweatshops and pollution havens of the world.
” Navarro added , “ This is an historic turning point in America ’ s efforts to onshore its pharmaceutical production and supply chains.
” The New York Times reported that the company could see the contract “ extended for a total of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ making it one of the largest awards in ” the history of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority ( BARDA ) .
Dr. Eric Edwards , the chief executive and president of Phlow , said in an interview with The New York Times , “ There are not a lot of people wanting to bring back generic medicine manufacturing to the United States that has been lost to India and China over decades .
You need someone like the federal government saying this is too important for us not to focus on.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ bills itself as an America First company .
“ The United States ’ drug supply chain is broken , becoming dangerously dependent upon Foreign Suppliers for our most essential generic medicines , ” the website reads .
“ Phlow was formed to manufacture low-cost , high quality , essential generic drugs for the United States.
” HHS Secretary Alex Azar said that the move was “ a significant step to rebuild our domestic ability to protect ourselves from health threats.
” “ Phlow plans to make drugs via a technique called ‘ continuous @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but still novel for pharmaceutical companies , ” Forbes reported .
“ Continuous manufacturing involves nonstop production within the same facility , which can save time and more quickly respond to drug shortages , though this can increase upfront costs.
” The move comes as the U.S. and other countries around the world have realized in recent months that they can not depend on China to be a reliable manufacturer of products that are critical to the U.S. supply chain , including medicines , due to China ’ s lies and cover-up that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wuhan , China .
Trump announced late on Monday evening that the U.S. would make its suspension of funding the World Health Organization permanent , and would even consider leaving , if “ major ” immediate changes were not made .
The Daily Wire , headed by bestselling author and popular podcast host Ben Shapiro , is a leading provider of conservative news , cutting through the mainstream media ’ s rhetoric to provide readers the most important , relevant , and engaging stories of the day .
Get inside access to The @ @ @ @ @ @ @

In an “historic turning point,” the Trump administration has taken bold action to bring America’s pharmaceutical manufacturing back to the U.S. from China and India.
“Seeking to secure the nation’s supply of critical medications, the Trump administration has signed a $354 million contract that would create the nation’s first strategic stockpile of key ingredients needed to make medicines,” NBC News reported. “The agreement was signed Monday with Phlow Corp., a generic drug maker based in Virginia.”
White House Trade Adviser Peter Navarro, a staunch China hawk who is the mastermind behind President Donald Trump’s trade war with the communist nation, said that the move “will not only help bring our essential medicines home but actually do so in a way that is cost competitive with the sweatshops and pollution havens of the world.”
Navarro added, “This is an historic turning point in America’s efforts to onshore its pharmaceutical production and supply chains.”
The New York Times reported that the company could see the contract “extended for a total of $812 million over 10 years, making it one of the largest awards in” the history of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA).
Dr. Eric Edwards, the chief executive and president of Phlow, said in an interview with The New York Times, “There are not a lot of people wanting to bring back generic medicine manufacturing to the United States that has been lost to India and China over decades. You need someone like the federal government saying this is too important for us not to focus on.”
On its website, Phlow Corp bills itself as an America First company. “The United States’ drug supply chain is broken, becoming dangerously dependent upon Foreign Suppliers for our most essential generic medicines,” the website reads. “Phlow was formed to manufacture low-cost, high quality, essential generic drugs for the United States.”
HHS Secretary Alex Azar said that the move was “a significant step to rebuild our domestic ability to protect ourselves from health threats.”
“Phlow plans to make drugs via a technique called ‘continuous manufacturing,’ widespread in other industries but still novel for pharmaceutical companies,” Forbes reported. “Continuous manufacturing involves nonstop production within the same facility, which can save time and more quickly respond to drug shortages, though this can increase upfront costs.”
The move comes as the U.S. and other countries around the world have realized in recent months that they cannot depend on China to be a reliable manufacturer of products that are critical to the U.S. supply chain, including medicines, due to China’s lies and cover-up that of the coronavirus pandemic that originated in Wuhan, China.
Trump announced late on Monday evening that the U.S. would make its suspension of funding the World Health Organization permanent, and would even consider leaving, if “major” immediate changes were not made.
The Daily Wire, headed by bestselling author and popular podcast host Ben Shapiro, is a leading provider of conservative news, cutting through the mainstream media’s rhetoric to provide readers the most important, relevant, and engaging stories of the day. Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a member.


bonginoreport--2020-05-20--House GOP Leader McCarthy Opposes Federal Mandate to Send Mail Ballots to All Voters

House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy said Tuesday that he opposes a federal mandate to require all states to automatically mail out ballots to every registered voter for the November election .
“ I would not support a federal mandate of taking over elections , '' the California Republican told Just the News during a press conference .
`` States have the power to run elections and they should .
They know best within their own state of how to run it .
We have supplied resources to make sure they 're secure in their elections as well , but states @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elections.
” McCarthy appeared at the news conference alongside Reps-elect Mike Garcia of California and Tom Tiffany of Wisconsin .
`` We just went through a special election in California where everybody was mailed a ballot , '' McCarthy said , referring to Garcia 's race .
`` They then opened up actual in-person voting , selecting based – I think it would be a little different then the way they selected it .
But we had a very fair , honest election that had an outcome that we had not seen in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tiffany 's victories are an early sign of what could happen for the GOP in November .
“ Just as we 've watched special elections before give us an early indicator of what will happen in November , I believe these two people standing behind me give us the best indication that come November , there will be a change in this House , and America will be in a much stronger position , ” he said .
The $ 3 trillion HEROES Act that the House passed includes a mandate for states @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voters .
In most states , individual voters have to submit a request for an absentee ballot .
Critics of the automatic mailing of ballots have raised fraud concerns .
According to Federal Election Assistance Commission data , 28.3 million mail-in ballots are still unaccounted for 2012 to 2018 .

House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy says he opposes a federal mandate requiring all states to automatically mail out ballots to every registered voter for the November election.
“I would not support a federal mandate of taking over elections," the California Republican told Just the News during a press conference Tuesday. "States have the power to run elections and they should. They know best within their own state of how to run it. We have supplied resources to make sure they're secure in their elections as well, but states can determine how they would run their elections.”
McCarthy appeared at the news conference alongside Reps-elect Mike Garcia of California and Tom Tiffany of Wisconsin.
"We just went through a special election in California where everybody was mailed a ballot," McCarthy said, referring to Garcia's race. "They then opened up actual in-person voting, selecting based – I think it would be a little different then the way they selected it. But we had a very fair, honest election that had an outcome that we had not seen in 22 years.”
McCarthy said Garcia and Tiffany's victories are an early sign of what could happen for the GOP in November.
“Just as we've watched special elections before give us an early indicator of what will happen in November, I believe these two people standing behind me give us the best indication that come November, there will be a change in this House, and America will be in a much stronger position,” he said.
The $3 trillion HEROES Act that the House passed includes a mandate for states to automatically mail ballots to all registered voters. In most states, individual voters have to submit a request for an absentee ballot.
Critics of the automatic mailing of ballots have raised fraud concerns. According to Federal Election Assistance Commission data, 28.3 million mail-in ballots from 2012 to 2018 remain unaccounted for as of April.


bonginoreport--2020-05-20--Ukraine Judge Orders Biden Be Listed as Alleged Perpetrator of Crime in Prosecutor’s Firing

The infamous story of Joe Biden ’ s effort to force the firing of Ukraine ’ s chief prosecutor in 2016 has taken a new legal twist in Kiev , just as the former vice president is sewing up the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination in America .
In Kiev late last month , District Court Judge S. V. Vovk ordered the country ’ s law enforcement services to formally list the fired prosecutor , Victor Shokin , as the victim of an alleged crime by the former U.S. vice president , according to an official English translation of the ruling @ @ @ @ @ @ @ court had previously ordered the Prosecutor General ’ s Office and the State Bureau of Investigations in February to investigate Shokin ’ s claim that he was fired in spring 2016 under pressure from Biden because he was investigating Burisma Holdings , the natural gas company where Biden ’ s son Hunter worked .
The court ruled then that there was adequate evidence to investigate Shokin ’ s claim that Biden ’ s pressure on then-President Petro Poroshenko , including a threat to withhold $ 1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees , amounted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ work as Ukraine ’ s chief prosecutor .
But when law enforcement agencies opened the probe they refused to name Biden as the alleged perpetrator of the crime , instead listing the potential defendant as an unnamed American .
Vovk ruled that anonymous listing was improper and ordered the law enforcement agencies to formally name Biden as the accused perpetrator .
The ruling orders “ a competent person of the Office of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine who conducts procedural management in criminal proceedings No .
62020000000000236 dated February 24 , 2020 to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pre-trial investigations … a summary of facts that may indicate the commission of a criminal offense under Paragraph 2 of Article 343 of the Criminal procedure code of Ukraine on criminal proceedings No .
62020000000000236 dated February 24 , 2020 , namely : information on interference in the activities of the former Prosecutor General of Ukraine Shokin , Viktor Mykolaiovych performed by citizen of the United States of America Joseph Biden , former U.S. Vice President.
” The judge added , “ the order of the court may not be appealed.
” Shokin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , confirmed the ruling to Just the News but said Ukraine officials have not yet complied .
“ Viktor Shokin publicly appealed to the president of Ukraine with a request to properly respond to illegal inaction in the investigation of criminal cases that are open against Joseph Biden , ” Teleshetskyi said .
“ Let me remind you that they were discovered precisely as a result of the statement of Viktor Shokin.
” The Biden-Shokin saga has dominated headlines for more than a year , and played a central role in the Democrat-led @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with President Trump ’ s acquittal in the Senate .
Biden has admitted on videotape he forced then-Ukraine President Poroshenko to fire Shokin in March 2016 by threatening to withhold $ 1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees .
But Biden has steadfastly denied Shokin ’ s firing was due to the Burisma case .
Instead , Biden said , he and other Western leaders believed Shokin was ineffective as a corruption fighter .
Shokin , however , has alleged in a court affidavit he was told he was fired because he refused to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by Burisma and after he planned to call Hunter Biden as a witness to question him about millions of dollars in payments his American firm received from the Ukraine gas company .
Shokin has also disputed Democrats ' claims he was fired because he was incompetent or corrupt , producing among other pieces of evidence a letter from the U.S. State Department in summer 2015 that praised his anti-corruption plan as Ukraine ’ s chief prosecutor .
While the Biden-Shokin factual dispute remains unresolved , the impeachment trial last year generated testimony from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hunter Biden ’ s role at Burisma while his father oversaw U.S.-Ukraine policy created an uncomfortable appearance of a conflict of interest .
Both Bidens have denied wrongdoing but acknowledged they wished they had handled the matter differently .
Shokin ’ s continued pursuit of a case in the Ukraine courts could prompt new disclosures this summer as Biden readies for the fall election against Trump .
On Tuesday , a Ukraine parliamentary member released what he said were excerpts of phone calls between Poroshenko and Biden discussing Shokin ’ s firing , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ yet .
In an interview , Shokin told Just the News he is confident he can unearth evidence during the proceedings that Ukraine officials were satisfied with his performance and simply acceded to firing him to avoid losing the badly needed U.S. loan guarantees .

The infamous story of Joe Biden’s effort to force the firing of Ukraine’s chief prosecutor in 2016 has taken a new legal twist in Kiev, just as the former vice president is sewing up the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination in America.
In Kiev late last month, District Court Judge S. V. Vovk ordered the country’s law enforcement services to formally list the fired prosecutor, Victor Shokin, as the victim of an alleged crime by the former U.S. vice president, according to an official English translation of the ruling obtained by Just the News.
The court had previously ordered the Prosecutor General’s Office and the State Bureau of Investigations in February to investigate Shokin’s claim that he was fired in spring 2016 under pressure from Biden because he was investigating Burisma Holdings, the natural gas company where Biden’s son Hunter worked.
The court ruled then that there was adequate evidence to investigate Shokin’s claim that Biden’s pressure on then-President Petro Poroshenko, including a threat to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees, amounted to unlawful interference in Shokin’s work as Ukraine’s chief prosecutor.
But when law enforcement agencies opened the probe they refused to name Biden as the alleged perpetrator of the crime, instead listing the potential defendant as an unnamed American.
Vovk ruled that anonymous listing was improper and ordered the law enforcement agencies to formally name Biden as the accused perpetrator.
The ruling orders “a competent person of the Office of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine who conducts procedural management in criminal proceedings No. 62020000000000236 dated February 24, 2020 to enter information into the Unified register of pre-trial investigations … a summary of facts that may indicate the commission of a criminal offense under Paragraph 2 of Article 343 of the Criminal procedure code of Ukraine on criminal proceedings No. 62020000000000236 dated February 24, 2020, namely: information on interference in the activities of the former Prosecutor General of Ukraine Shokin, Viktor Mykolaiovych performed by citizen of the United States of America Joseph Biden, former U.S. Vice President.”
The judge added, “the order of the court may not be appealed.”
Shokin’s attorney, Oleksandr Ivanovych Teleshetskyi, confirmed the ruling to Just the News but said Ukraine officials have not yet complied.
“Viktor Shokin publicly appealed to the president of Ukraine with a request to properly respond to illegal inaction in the investigation of criminal cases that are open against Joseph Biden,” Teleshetskyi said. “Let me remind you that they were discovered precisely as a result of the statement of Viktor Shokin.”
The Biden-Shokin saga has dominated headlines for more than a year, and played a central role in the Democrat-led impeachment proceedings that ended earlier this year with President Trump’s acquittal in the Senate.
Biden has admitted on videotape he forced then-Ukraine President Poroshenko to fire Shokin in March 2016 by threatening to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees. But Biden has steadfastly denied Shokin’s firing was due to the Burisma case. Instead, Biden said, he and other Western leaders believed Shokin was ineffective as a corruption fighter.
Shokin, however, has alleged in a court affidavit he was told he was fired because he refused to stand down his investigation of alleged corruption by Burisma and after he planned to call Hunter Biden as a witness to question him about millions of dollars in payments his American firm received from the Ukraine gas company.
Shokin has also disputed Democrats' claims he was fired because he was incompetent or corrupt, producing among other pieces of evidence a letter from the U.S. State Department in summer 2015 that praised his anti-corruption plan as Ukraine’s chief prosecutor.
While the Biden-Shokin factual dispute remains unresolved, the impeachment trial last year generated testimony from State Department witnesses who said they believed Hunter Biden’s role at Burisma while his father oversaw U.S.-Ukraine policy created an uncomfortable appearance of a conflict of interest.
Both Bidens have denied wrongdoing but acknowledged they wished they had handled the matter differently.
Shokin’s continued pursuit of a case in the Ukraine courts could prompt new disclosures this summer as Biden readies for the fall election against Trump.
On Tuesday, a Ukraine parliamentary member released what he said were excerpts of phone calls between Poroshenko and Biden discussing Shokin’s firing, but neither man has confirmed their authenticity yet.
In an interview, Shokin told Just the News he is confident he can unearth evidence during the proceedings that Ukraine officials were satisfied with his performance and simply acceded to firing him to avoid losing the badly needed U.S. loan guarantees.