thelibertybeacon--2020-05-23--Dear Greta, whatever you do, don’t mention 5G

ER ’ s neglect of the 5G environmental issue : stupidity , laxity or duplicity ?
Why does Greta Thunberg and her Extinction Rebellion environmentalist group steadfastly never mention 5G ?
It is a very odd omission and contradiction for a group purportedly so concerned about the environment and the survival of future generations to NEVER TALK about 5G .
After all , 5G masts are going to go up near schools and homes , a pretty good way of stealing the future of the youngsters Thunberg purports to represent if those warning of 5G dangers are even partially correct @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about 5G ?
There are millions of people after all who are conceernd about its impact upon the environment .
If Thunberg or the possee of confidantes who advise her honestly think that 5G presents no environmental or health threat , then they could at least come clean and say so , citing the scientific evidence for their view .
To help you better understand this , here are some articles and videos for your consideration .
• The likely devastating impact of 5G radiation upon the environment here • The likely devastating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ here and here • Extinction Rebellion links to globalism in general and Bill Gates in particular ( who has heavily invested in 5G as well as vaccines ) here • Incredibly , NO STUDIES TO PROVE THE SAFETY of 5G RADIATION HAVE BEEN DONE .
Given that 5G is being rolled out across the freakin ’ planet , you ’ d think that the industry would have thoroughly studied its safety and health implications first wouldn ’ t you ?
Or that governments with some shred of a sense of responsibility towards their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or commissioned an impartial investigation themselves .
But no , apparently not .
When United States senator Blumenthal asked the question at a 5G Senate Commerce Committee Hearing in February as to how many studies have actually been done into the safety of 5G , the answer was NONE Here is a video of the hearing so you can see and hear for yourself .
So when you ask , “ is 5G safe ?
” and the companies that have invested billions in its roll out tell you , “ Oh yes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ well they would say that wouldn ’ t they ?
The honest answer would be that they don ’ t really know for sure because they ’ ve never properly studied it !
Now , it might turn out that 5G is safe .
I personally doubt it , but it might .
But we can ’ t know for sure until the issue has been properly independently and scientificially studied .
A request for a full , impartial scientific investigation into the full health and environmental impact of 5G before it is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conspiracy theory , it is plain pro-survival common sense !
You would not , after all , bring into worldwide service a new passenger aircraft without first thoroughly testing it and ensuring it is airworthy and not going to kill its passengers .
Imagine a scenario in which a new cheap , tasty sausage is put on the market , to be bought and eaten by millions .
When people enquire quite reasonably , “ is it safe to eat and not going to poison me ?
” you would not accept the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , we ’ ve never tested that but we assure you it ’ s safe.
” Nor would you accept being told you are “ an anti-sausage conspiracy theorist ” simply because you insist on the manufacturer proving the sausage is safe before you or your kids eat it .
Of course , if you have doubts about an aircraft or a new sausage , you can always avoid them .
With 5G , however , you won ’ t be able to .
And if it turns out that 5G has the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ plants and insects that many experts contend that it will have , the effect upon human survival may be pretty horrible .
Worse , the full consequences may not become evident until many years have gone by so by the time it becomes clear we ’ ve made a horrible mistake , it ’ ll be too late .
So why in God ’ s name are we playing Russian Roulette with this thing ?
The level of irresponsibility and sheer recklessness on the part of the industry and many governments beggars belief @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Thunberg and Extinction Rebellion in deflecting attention away from this crucial environmental issue has been negligent or unintelligent at best , or simply downright duplicitous .
The above feature is from UK Reloaded The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

ER’s neglect of the 5G environmental issue: stupidity, laxity or duplicity?
by Steve Cook
Why does Greta Thunberg and her Extinction Rebellion environmentalist group steadfastly never mention 5G?
It is a very odd omission and contradiction for a group purportedly so concerned about the environment and the survival of future generations to NEVER TALK about 5G. After all, 5G masts are going to go up near schools and homes, a pretty good way of stealing the future of the youngsters Thunberg purports to represent if those warning of 5G dangers are even partially correct.
Why don’t they talk about 5G? There are millions of people after all who are conceernd about its impact upon the environment. If Thunberg or the possee of confidantes who advise her honestly think that 5G presents no environmental or health threat, then they could at least come clean and say so, citing the scientific evidence for their view.
To help you better understand this, here are some articles and videos for your consideration.
The likely devastating impact of 5G radiation upon the environment here
The likely devastating impact of 5G upon the human organism here and here
Extinction Rebellion links to globalism in general and Bill Gates in particular (who has heavily invested in 5G as well as vaccines) here
Incredibly, NO STUDIES TO PROVE THE SAFETY of 5G RADIATION HAVE BEEN DONE. Given that 5G is being rolled out across the freakin’ planet, you’d think that the industry would have thoroughly studied its safety and health implications first wouldn’t you? Or that governments with some shred of a sense of responsibility towards their citizens might have insisted they do it or commissioned an impartial investigation themselves. But no, apparently not. When United States senator Blumenthal asked the question at a 5G Senate Commerce Committee Hearing in February as to how many studies have actually been done into the safety of 5G, the answer was NONE Here is a video of the hearing so you can see and hear for yourself.
So when you ask, “is 5G safe?” and the companies that have invested billions in its roll out tell you, “Oh yes, it is perfectly safe”, well they would say that wouldn’t they? The honest answer would be that they don’t really know for sure because they’ve never properly studied it!
Now, it might turn out that 5G is safe. I personally doubt it, but it might. But we can’t know for sure until the issue has been properly independently and scientificially studied.
A request for a full, impartial scientific investigation into the full health and environmental impact of 5G before it is rolled out isn’t a ruddy conspiracy theory, it is plain pro-survival common sense!
You would not, after all, bring into worldwide service a new passenger aircraft without first thoroughly testing it and ensuring it is airworthy and not going to kill its passengers.
Imagine a scenario in which a new cheap, tasty sausage is put on the market, to be bought and eaten by millions. When people enquire quite reasonably, “is it safe to eat and not going to poison me?” you would not accept the sausage manufacturer telling you, “Well, we’ve never tested that but we assure you it’s safe.” Nor would you accept being told you are “an anti-sausage conspiracy theorist” simply because you insist on the manufacturer proving the sausage is safe before you or your kids eat it.
Of course, if you have doubts about an aircraft or a new sausage, you can always avoid them.
With 5G, however, you won’t be able to.
And if it turns out that 5G has the devastating effects on humans, animals, plants and insects that many experts contend that it will have, the effect upon human survival may be pretty horrible. Worse, the full consequences may not become evident until many years have gone by so by the time it becomes clear we’ve made a horrible mistake, it’ll be too late. So why in God’s name are we playing Russian Roulette with this thing?
The level of irresponsibility and sheer recklessness on the part of the industry and many governments beggars belief.
And the role played by Greta Thunberg and Extinction Rebellion in deflecting attention away from this crucial environmental issue has been negligent or unintelligent at best, or simply downright duplicitous.
The above feature is from UK Reloaded
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-23--More than 1,300 Veterans Given Hydroxychloroquine for COV-19

More than 1,300 Veterans Given Hydroxychloroquine for COV-19 Roughly 1,300 patients at Department of Veterans Affairs medical facilities have received hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 since late March , according to VA Secretary Robert Wilkie .
In a letter to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer , D-New York , this week , Wilkie said that , between Feb. 1 and April 23 , the VA purchased more than 6.3 million tablets of the antimalarial drug , which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in late March on an emergency use basis to treat the novel coronavirus .
Hydroxychloroquine is normally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and the VA dispenses roughly 1 million pills of it a month for those conditions , according to Wilkie .
Sen. Chuck Schumer , D-N.Y. , attends a ceremony on Capitol Hill , on Nov. 19 , 2019 , in Washington .
( AP Photo/Michael A. McCoy ) Schumer said he and several veterans groups have concerns about the use of the medication on VA patients , many of whom are older and have underlying health conditions that make them more susceptible to the drug ’ s most severe side effect , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Redfield & Birx … Can They Be Trusted With COVID ?
The Global Political Project Imposed on the Occasion of Covid-19 As Moderna ’ s COVID-19 Vaccine Takes the Lead , its Chief Medical Officer ’ s Recent Promotion of “ Gene-Editing Vaccines ” Comes to Light The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .
Disclaimer : The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including , but not limited to , text , graphics , images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction .
Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute @ @ @ @ @ @ @ treatment .

More than 1,300 Veterans Given Hydroxychloroquine for COV-19
Hydroxychloroquine has been widely praised as a treatment by President Trump, who has admitted that he has taken it as a prophylaxis to prevent infection. ~(TLB) ed.
Military.com
Roughly 1,300 patients at Department of Veterans Affairs medical facilities have received hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 since late March, according to VA Secretary Robert Wilkie.
In a letter to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-New York, this week, Wilkie said that, between Feb. 1 and April 23, the VA purchased more than 6.3 million tablets of the antimalarial drug, which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in late March on an emergency use basis to treat the novel coronavirus.
***
Hydroxychloroquine is normally used to treat lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, and the VA dispenses roughly 1 million pills of it a month for those conditions, according to Wilkie.
***
Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., attends a ceremony on Capitol Hill, on Nov. 19, 2019, in Washington. (AP Photo/Michael A. McCoy)
***
Schumer said he and several veterans groups have concerns about the use of the medication on VA patients, many of whom are older and have underlying health conditions that make them more susceptible to the drug’s most severe side effect, a disruption of regular heart rhythms.
Related articles from The Liberty Beacon:
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-23--Professor Sunetra Gupta: ‘COVID Epidemic on Its Way Out’ [Video]

Sunetra Gupta : Covid-19 is on the way out It ’ s the biggest question in the world right now : is Covid-19 a deadly disease that only a small fraction of our populations have so far been exposed to ?
Or is it a much milder pandemic that a large percentage of people have already encountered and is already on its way out ?
If Professor Neil Ferguson of Imperial College is the figurehead for the first opinion , then Sunetra Gupta , Professor of Theoretical Epidemiology at the University of Oxford , is the representative of the second @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rival model to Ferguson ’ s back in March which speculated that as much as 50 % of the population may already have been infected and the true Infection Fatality Rate may be as low as 0.1 % .
Since then , we have seen various antibody studies around the world indicating a disappointingly small percentage of seroprevalence — the percentage of the population has the anti-Covid-19 antibody .
It was starting to seem like Ferguson ’ s view was the one closer to the truth .
But , in her first major @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in March , Professor Gupta is only more convinced that her original opinion was correct .
As she sees it , the antibody studies , although useful , do not indicate the true level of exposure or level of immunity .
First , many of the antibody tests are “ extremely unreliable ” and rely on hard-to-achieve representative groups .
But more important , many people who have been exposed to the virus will have other kinds of immunity that don ’ t show up on antibody tests — either for genetic reasons @ @ @ @ @ @ @ related coronaviruses such as the common cold .
The implications of this are profound – it means that when we hear results from antibody tests ( such as a forthcoming official UK Government study ) the percentage who test positive for antibodies is not necessarily equal to the percentage who have immunity or resistance to the virus .
The true number could be much higher .
Observing the very similar patterns of the epidemic across countries around the world has convinced Professor Gupta that it is this hidden immunity , more than lockdowns @ @ @ @ @ @ @ best explanation of the Covid-19 progression : “ In almost every context we ’ ve seen the epidemic grow , turn around and die away — almost like clockwork .
Different countries have had different lockdown policies , and yet what we ’ ve observed is almost a uniform pattern of behaviour which is highly consistent with the SIR model .
To me that suggests that much of the driving force here was due to the build-up of immunity .
I think that ’ s a more parsimonious explanation than one which requires @ @ @ @ @ @ @ various degrees of lockdown , including no lockdown ) to have had the same effect.
” Asked what her updated estimate for the Infection Fatality Rate is , Professor Gupta says , “ I think that the epidemic has largely come and is on its way out in this country so I think it would be definitely less than 1 in 1000 and probably closer to 1 in 10,000.
” That would be somewhere between 0.1 % and 0.01 % .
Professor Gupta also remains openly critical of the Government lockdown policy : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that this [ the Imperial College model ] was a plausible worst case scenario .
I agree it was a plausible — or at least a possible — worst case scenario .
The question is , should we act on a possible worst case scenario , given the costs of lockdown ?
It seems to me that given that the costs of lockdown are mounting , that case is becoming more and more fragile.
” She recommends “ a more rapid exit from lockdown based more on certain heuristics , like who is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ death rates ” .
She does not believe that the R rate is a useful tool in making decisions about government policies , as an R rate is “ principally dependent on how many people are immune ” and we don ’ t have that information .
She believes that deaths are the only reliable measure , and that the number of cases should not even be presented as it is so reliant on the amount of testing being done .
She explains the flare-ups in places like New York , where the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 0.1 % , through a combination of circumstances leading to unusually bad outbreaks , including the infection load and the layout of the population : “ When you have pockets of vulnerable people it might rip through those pockets in a way that it wouldn ’ t if the vulnerable people were more scattered within the general population.
” She believes that longer-term lockdown-style social distancing makes us more vulnerable , not less vulnerable , to infectious diseases , because it keeps people unprotected from pathogens : “ Remaining in a state of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of view of the vulnerability of the entire population to new pathogens .
Effectively we used to live in a state approximating lockdown 100 years ago , and that was what created the conditions for the Spanish Flu to come in and kill 50m people.
” Commenting on the Government response to the virus , she suggests it erred on the side of over-reaction not under-reaction : “ I think there ’ s a chance we might have done better by doing nothing at all , or at least by doing something different @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attention to protecting the vulnerable , to have thought about protecting the vulnerable 30 or 40 years ago when we started cutting hospital beds .
The roots of this go a long , long way back.
” And she believes it is a “ strong possibility ” that if we return to full normal tomorrow — pubs , nightclubs , festivals — we would be fine , but accepts that is hard to prove with the current evidence : “ So what do we do ?
I think we weigh that strong possibility @ @ @ @ @ @ @ think it is very dangerous to talk about lockdown without recognising the enormous costs that it has on other vulnerable sectors in the population.
” On the politics of the question , Professor Gupta is clear that she believes that lockdowns are an affront to progressive values : “ So I know there is a sort of libertarian argument for the release of lockdown , and I think it is unfortunate that those of us who feel we should think differently about lockdown have had our voices added to that libertarian harangue .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ a luxury , and it ’ s a luxury that the middle classes are enjoying and higher income countries are enjoying at the expense of the poor , the vulnerable and less developed countries .
It ’ s a very serious crisis.
” “ Trust Is Being Undermined ” – Harvard Med School Prof Questions Fauci ’ s “ Shading ” of Trial Results

Sunetra Gupta: Covid-19 is on the way out
The author of the Oxford model defends her view that the virus has passed through the UK’s population
BY FREDDIE SAYERS
It’s the biggest question in the world right now: is Covid-19 a deadly disease that only a small fraction of our populations have so far been exposed to? Or is it a much milder pandemic that a large percentage of people have already encountered and is already on its way out?
If Professor Neil Ferguson of Imperial College is the figurehead for the first opinion, then Sunetra Gupta, Professor of Theoretical Epidemiology at the University of Oxford, is the representative of the second. Her group at Oxford produced a rival model to Ferguson’s back in March which speculated that as much as 50% of the population may already have been infected and the true Infection Fatality Rate may be as low as 0.1%.
Since then, we have seen various antibody studies around the world indicating a disappointingly small percentage of seroprevalence — the percentage of the population has the anti-Covid-19 antibody. It was starting to seem like Ferguson’s view was the one closer to the truth.
But, in her first major interview since the Oxford study was published in March, Professor Gupta is only more convinced that her original opinion was correct.
As she sees it, the antibody studies, although useful, do not indicate the true level of exposure or level of immunity. First, many of the antibody tests are “extremely unreliable” and rely on hard-to-achieve representative groups. But more important, many people who have been exposed to the virus will have other kinds of immunity that don’t show up on antibody tests — either for genetic reasons or the result of pre-existing immunities to related coronaviruses such as the common cold.
The implications of this are profound – it means that when we hear results from antibody tests (such as a forthcoming official UK Government study) the percentage who test positive for antibodies is not necessarily equal to the percentage who have immunity or resistance to the virus. The true number could be much higher.
Observing the very similar patterns of the epidemic across countries around the world has convinced Professor Gupta that it is this hidden immunity, more than lockdowns or government interventions, that offers the best explanation of the Covid-19 progression:
“In almost every context we’ve seen the epidemic grow, turn around and die away — almost like clockwork. Different countries have had different lockdown policies, and yet what we’ve observed is almost a uniform pattern of behaviour which is highly consistent with the SIR model. To me that suggests that much of the driving force here was due to the build-up of immunity. I think that’s a more parsimonious explanation than one which requires in every country for lockdown (or various degrees of lockdown, including no lockdown) to have had the same effect.”
Asked what her updated estimate for the Infection Fatality Rate is, Professor Gupta says, “I think that the epidemic has largely come and is on its way out in this country so I think it would be definitely less than 1 in 1000 and probably closer to 1 in 10,000.” That would be somewhere between 0.1% and 0.01%.
Professor Gupta also remains openly critical of the Government lockdown policy:
“The Government’s defence is that this [the Imperial College model] was a plausible worst case scenario. I agree it was a plausible — or at least a possible — worst case scenario. The question is, should we act on a possible worst case scenario, given the costs of lockdown? It seems to me that given that the costs of lockdown are mounting, that case is becoming more and more fragile.”
She recommends “a more rapid exit from lockdown based more on certain heuristics, like who is dying and what is happening to the death rates”. She does not believe that the R rate is a useful tool in making decisions about government policies, as an R rate is “principally dependent on how many people are immune” and we don’t have that information.
She believes that deaths are the only reliable measure, and that the number of cases should not even be presented as it is so reliant on the amount of testing being done.
She explains the flare-ups in places like New York, where the IFR seems to have been higher than 0.1%, through a combination of circumstances leading to unusually bad outbreaks, including the infection load and the layout of the population:
“When you have pockets of vulnerable people it might rip through those pockets in a way that it wouldn’t if the vulnerable people were more scattered within the general population.”
She believes that longer-term lockdown-style social distancing makes us more vulnerable, not less vulnerable, to infectious diseases, because it keeps people unprotected from pathogens:
“Remaining in a state of lockdown is extremely dangerous from the point of view of the vulnerability of the entire population to new pathogens. Effectively we used to live in a state approximating lockdown 100 years ago, and that was what created the conditions for the Spanish Flu to come in and kill 50m people.”
Commenting on the Government response to the virus, she suggests it erred on the side of over-reaction not under-reaction:
“I think there’s a chance we might have done better by doing nothing at all, or at least by doing something different, which would have been to pay attention to protecting the vulnerable, to have thought about protecting the vulnerable 30 or 40 years ago when we started cutting hospital beds. The roots of this go a long, long way back.”
And she believes it is a “strong possibility” that if we return to full normal tomorrow — pubs, nightclubs, festivals — we would be fine, but accepts that is hard to prove with the current evidence:
“So what do we do? I think we weigh that strong possibility against the costs of lockdown. I think it is very dangerous to talk about lockdown without recognising the enormous costs that it has on other vulnerable sectors in the population.”
On the politics of the question, Professor Gupta is clear that she believes that lockdowns are an affront to progressive values:
“So I know there is a sort of libertarian argument for the release of lockdown, and I think it is unfortunate that those of us who feel we should think differently about lockdown have had our voices added to that libertarian harangue. But the truth is that lockdown is a luxury, and it’s a luxury that the middle classes are enjoying and higher income countries are enjoying at the expense of the poor, the vulnerable and less developed countries. It’s a very serious crisis.”
*********
(TLB) published this article/video report from UnHerd.com
Freddie Sayers is the Executive Editor of UnHerd. He was previously Editor-in-Chief of YouGov, and founder of PoliticsHome. .
Related article from The Liberty Beacon:
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-23--KEN’S CORNER: Creating a Formidable & Unforgiving Enemy

There are two separate aspects of Christian thought when considering forgiveness , and it has caused much consternation throughout history .
The first is what is emphatically written in the Bible , and the second is the reality of a human mind .
And then the unforgivable sin… .
Now , I ’ m not here to define or interpret these ideas , just to point them out .
These thoughts are indeed Christian , and not of the Talmud , the Koran , or the Old Testament , and yet I struggle to understand them in my own mind @ @ @ @ @ @ @ speaks of Love in a selfless way , and yet we have a powerful threat from God .
After years of reading and studying a good sampling of these works can one conclude that there is a difference between revenge and justice , wrath and vengeance as opposed to forgiveness , and the difference is as profound as war and peace… A God of wrath and vengeance , and a God of Love , do not seem compatible or in any way like-minded .
A Christian , for instance , who exclaims their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and fear in another , seems very confused indeed .
Slavery of spirit , are what is termed volunteer servitude , is in direct opposition to free will , and Liberty from tyranny .
Of all of the different forms of slavery , surely slavery of the spirit is the most horrific of all .
Be careful of any person or intuition who will quote the wrath and revenge of the Old Testament to justify their intentions , insinuating it was spoken by Jesus .
Trust no person , religion or institution who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of another , to make their point .
Truth can never be gained by the use of a lie .
It can ’ t be denied that war has been a constant companion to every one of these religions , and amazingly , few will question why .
Let us consider three question in the quest to understand… • None If we all pray to the same God , why is there such a difference in perception ?
• None Why is there so much hate , and so little Love , with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ • None If religion teaches self-responsibility .
free-will , and accountability , why do we go to war without knowing why ?
Creating a monster , and then destroying him , is very lucrative… How can you create an unforgiving enemy in the mind of men ?
Seems , according to the teachings of Christ , that anything we do to each other can be forgiven .
Love one another , forgive one another , is at the very heart of Christianity , but is that possible in every situation ?
Are some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the very heart of God , in Mark ?
When we compare the atrocities of a far-away war , with mayhem close to home , is seems the latter will take precedence .
If something has the potential to affect your family personally , you will take much more of a notice .
So easy to judge others without empathy , when you are safe and sound in your home .
So easy to have an opinion , and to promote it as truth , as you sit comfortably and without consequence , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , there is one unforgivable sin in the mind of man , and it is so horrendous , so profound , that we would actually rearrange both our mind and life , with a reality undeniably and forever altered .
It could never be forgotten , nor could it be forgiven : It is the intentional death of a child by the hand of another .
I ’ m not talking about an accident , but a planned , premeditated , calculated murder .
Revenge killing , without a thought for innocence , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agenda , or to promote and instill shock , awe , and fear , and justifying the act as a casualty of war… for profit .
Yes , all wars are banker wars… Of everything we could face on this beautiful earth , no matter what religion , race , or country of origin , if someone kills your child out of hate and malice , forgiveness is impossible .
So profound is the thought of this , the mere suggestion is unthinkable , even the consideration of a veiled threat is virtually @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to bend even eternity to prevent it .
And yet , at this very moment in time , whole nations , whole religions , whole races think that everything they are is coming to an end .
What is the greatest motivation in the face of fear ?
Protect our children .
Heaven forbid the reality of it , but in the dark of night , while you thought safe in your beds , your home is bombed and your children are killed… What then ?
Well , your book of life would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and from that moment on your existence would have a new direction , a singular purpose , to bring those who did this deed to task .
Is a Christian beyond the scope of this scenario ?
No , because he too is only human , and he too can be reborn a monster .
What happens if , in your anguish and grief , in the very epicenter of that horror , you can not find the person who did such a thing ?
Who pulled the lever , pushed the button @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if you could not find the person who made the decision to bomb you ?
The trigger of the mind… What toggle triggered you to scream in horror , trying to get them to breathe again ?
What element of sanity can save you , and your future , as you run and stumble sobbing without direction , holding their bloody and lifeless bodies in your arms ?
What solace could you ever find , what justification could you ever exact as you looked into that black void of sky with blinding tears @ @ @ @ @ @ @ happens to your soul , you mind , your character , as their blood coagulates down your night-clothes , and their bodies grow cold and stiff ?
What happens to your spirit as your wife finds you there , unable to let go ?
What happens when you look into your child ’ s face together ?
What do you do , what do you think , as the dirt is piled over their graves , and you walk home to the rubble of your home , and your dreams ?
You would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who supported it , the race , the religion , or even a philosophy , and hatred would be your guiding force , tit for tat forever .
This tit for tat is found in every religion , even with the Love and tolerance of Christianity… You would become , for all intent and purpose , totally insane , and you could never be put whole again .
You no longer , and could never again consider or define what is right and wrong , good and bad , and would relive that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , like an endless loop .
And this is why Christians , Muslims , and Jews have persecuted each other for thousands of years .
Sam Keen , the author of Fire in the Belly and Faces of the Enemy , is what I consider the most important philosopher of our time .
Only in a poem could such a profound idea be expressed , as we are again dehumanizing enemies for the power elite , war for the sake of a war machine that must be fed .
Truth is so very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ screaming in fear .
How to Create an Enemy by Sam Keen : From the Author , Ken La Rive – We in the Liberty movement have been fighting to take back this country for less than a decade , peacefully and with the love of God and country in our hearts .
Our banner has been trampled on and displaced by a multitude of distractions , further eroding our nation and the cause for Liberty .
And so , as we are pulled by forces we can not fathom , powerful entities @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , unaccountable trillions printed out of thin air and put on our backs as debt , we must formulate the most pitiful of all questions any patriot might ask in the final hour : Are we going to fight for our master ’ s tyranny , or are we going to demand the return of our civil liberties and Constitution ?
Are we going to choose The Banner of Liberty , or the shackles of voluntary servitude ?
Will it be a war for corporate profit , or a war to regain our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ blood and toil of our forefathers presented to us , their children , as a gift ?
I fear that decision is emanate .
I fear that any decision will be a hard one , but my greatest fear of all is that the decision has already been made for us .

KEN’S CORNER: Creating a Formidable & Unforgiving Enemy
••••
“Sin has many tools, but a lie is the handle which fits them all.” -Edmond Maria E Burke
“Be careful of the institution who promotes itself truthful… but caught in a lie.” –Ken LaRive
••••
Commentary by TLB Contributing Writer: Ken LaRive
A consideration of forgiveness…
There are two separate aspects of Christian thought when considering forgiveness, and it has caused much consternation throughout history. The first is what is emphatically written in the Bible, and the second is the reality of a human mind.
First in Matthew 5:44, – “But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;”
And then the unforgivable sin….
“I promise you that any of the sinful things you say or do can be forgiven, no matter how terrible those things are. But if you speak against the Holy Spirit, you can never be forgiven. That sin will be held against you forever.” — Mark 3:28-29 (CEV)
Beyond forgiveness forever, and ever…
Now, I’m not here to define or interpret these ideas, just to point them out. These thoughts are indeed Christian, and not of the Talmud, the Koran, or the Old Testament, and yet I struggle to understand them in my own mind and heart. Only the New Testament speaks of Love in a selfless way, and yet we have a powerful threat from God.
A consideration truth, Love, and slavery…
After years of reading and studying a good sampling of these works can one conclude that there is a difference between revenge and justice, wrath and vengeance as opposed to forgiveness, and the difference is as profound as war and peace… A God of wrath and vengeance, and a God of Love, do not seem compatible or in any way like-minded. A Christian, for instance, who exclaims their Love of God in one breath, and fear in another, seems very confused indeed. Slavery of spirit, are what is termed volunteer servitude, is in direct opposition to free will, and Liberty from tyranny. Of all of the different forms of slavery, surely slavery of the spirit is the most horrific of all. Be careful of any person or intuition who will quote the wrath and revenge of the Old Testament to justify their intentions, insinuating it was spoken by Jesus. Trust no person, religion or institution who puts words or ideas in the mouths of another, to make their point. Truth can never be gained by the use of a lie.
It can’t be denied that war has been a constant companion to every one of these religions, and amazingly, few will question why.
Let us consider three question in the quest to understand…
If we all pray to the same God, why is there such a difference in perception? Why is there so much hate, and so little Love, with tolerance for the differences in ideology? If religion teaches self-responsibility. free-will, and accountability, why do we go to war without knowing why?
Creating a monster, and then destroying him, is very lucrative…
How can you create an unforgiving enemy in the mind of men? Seems, according to the teachings of Christ, that anything we do to each other can be forgiven. Love one another, forgive one another, is at the very heart of Christianity, but is that possible in every situation? Are some things beyond forgiveness, as found in the very heart of God, in Mark?
When we compare the atrocities of a far-away war, with mayhem close to home, is seems the latter will take precedence. If something has the potential to affect your family personally, you will take much more of a notice. So easy to judge others without empathy, when you are safe and sound in your home. So easy to have an opinion, and to promote it as truth, as you sit comfortably and without consequence, behind your computer screen.
The monsters we create…
And yes, there is one unforgivable sin in the mind of man, and it is so horrendous, so profound, that we would actually rearrange both our mind and life, with a reality undeniably and forever altered. It could never be forgotten, nor could it be forgiven: It is the intentional death of a child by the hand of another. I’m not talking about an accident, but a planned, premeditated, calculated murder. Revenge killing, without a thought for innocence, killing for effect, to achieve an agenda, or to promote and instill shock, awe, and fear, and justifying the act as a casualty of war… for profit. Yes, all wars are banker wars…
Of everything we could face on this beautiful earth, no matter what religion, race, or country of origin, if someone kills your child out of hate and malice, forgiveness is impossible. So profound is the thought of this, the mere suggestion is unthinkable, even the consideration of a veiled threat is virtually intolerable, and a parent will attempt to bend even eternity to prevent it. And yet, at this very moment in time, whole nations, whole religions, whole races think that everything they are is coming to an end. What is the greatest motivation in the face of fear? Protect our children.
Heaven forbid the reality of it, but in the dark of night, while you thought safe in your beds, your home is bombed and your children are killed… What then? Well, your book of life would close, and another would open, and from that moment on your existence would have a new direction, a singular purpose, to bring those who did this deed to task. Is a Christian beyond the scope of this scenario? No, because he too is only human, and he too can be reborn a monster.
What happens if, in your anguish and grief, in the very epicenter of that horror, you cannot find the person who did such a thing? Who pulled the lever, pushed the button, or squeezed the trigger? What if you could not find the person who made the decision to bomb you?
The trigger of the mind…
What toggle triggered you to scream in horror, trying to get them to breathe again? What element of sanity can save you, and your future, as you run and stumble sobbing without direction, holding their bloody and lifeless bodies in your arms? What solace could you ever find, what justification could you ever exact as you looked into that black void of sky with blinding tears, and a broken heart? What happens to your soul, you mind, your character, as their blood coagulates down your night-clothes, and their bodies grow cold and stiff? What happens to your spirit as your wife finds you there, unable to let go? What happens when you look into your child’s face together? What do you do, what do you think, as the dirt is piled over their graves, and you walk home to the rubble of your home, and your dreams?
You would look to exact revenge on the group who supported it, the race, the religion, or even a philosophy, and hatred would be your guiding force, tit for tat forever. This tit for tat is found in every religion, even with the Love and tolerance of Christianity…
You would become, for all intent and purpose, totally insane, and you could never be put whole again. You no longer, and could never again consider or define what is right and wrong, good and bad, and would relive that moment for the rest of your life, like an endless loop. And this is why Christians, Muslims, and Jews have persecuted each other for thousands of years.
Sam Keen, the author of Fire in the Belly and Faces of the Enemy, is what I consider the most important philosopher of our time. Only in a poem could such a profound idea be expressed, as we are again dehumanizing enemies for the power elite, war for the sake of a war machine that must be fed. Truth is so very hard to swallow, in a world screaming in fear.
How to Create an Enemy by Sam Keen:
Sketch in broad outline the forms of men, women, and children. Dip into the unconsciousness well of your own disowned darkness with a wide brush and strain the strangers with the sinister hue of the shadow. Trace onto the face of the enemy the greed, hatred, carelessness you dare not claim as your own. Obscure the sweet individuality of each face. Erase all hints of the myriad loves, hopes, fears that play through the kaleidoscope of every infinite heart. Twist the smile until it forms the downward arc of cruelty. Strip flesh from bone until only the abstract skeleton of death remains. Exaggerate each feature until man is metamorphasized into beast, vermin, insect. Fill in the background with malignant figures from ancient nightmares – devils, demons, myrmidons of evil. When your icon of the enemy is complete you will be able to kill without guilt, slaughter without shame. The thing you destroy will have become merely an enemy of God, an impediment to the sacred dialectic of history.
••••
“Forgive your enemies, but never forget their names.” – Joseph Robert Kennedy
“When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants and murderers, and for a time, they can seem invincible, but in the end, they always fall. Think of it–always.” – Mahatma Gandhi
••••
Read more great articles from KEN’S CORNER
••••
From the Author, Ken La Rive – We in the Liberty movement have been fighting to take back this country for less than a decade, peacefully and with the love of God and country in our hearts. Our banner has been trampled on and displaced by a multitude of distractions, further eroding our nation and the cause for Liberty. And so, as we are pulled by forces we cannot fathom, powerful entities with unlimited resources stolen from our future, unaccountable trillions printed out of thin air and put on our backs as debt, we must formulate the most pitiful of all questions any patriot might ask in the final hour: Are we going to fight for our master’s tyranny, or are we going to demand the return of our civil liberties and Constitution? Are we going to choose The Banner of Liberty, or the shackles of voluntary servitude? Will it be a war for corporate profit, or a war to regain our ability to self govern, as the blood and toil of our forefathers presented to us, their children, as a gift? I fear that decision is emanate. I fear that any decision will be a hard one, but my greatest fear of all is that the decision has already been made for us.
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-23--Vaccine Trial Catastrophe: Moderna Vaccine has 20% ‘Serious’ Injury Rate in High Dose Group

Despite Moderna ’ s cheery press release this week , the clinical trial results for its groundbreaking COVID vaccine could not be much worse .
The vaccine , developed and championed by Anthony Fauci and financed by Bill Gates , used an experimental mRNA technology that the two men hoped would allow rapid deployment to meet President Trump ’ s ambitious “ warp speed ” time line .
Dr. Fauci was so confident of his shot ’ s safety that he waived ferret and primate studies ( Moderna suspiciously reported no specific health data from its mouse studies ) .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Three of the 15 human guinea pigs in the high dose cohort ( 250 mcg ) suffered a “ serious adverse event ” within 43 days of receiving Moderna ’ s jab .
Moderna did not release its clinical trial study or raw data , but its press release , which was freighted with inconsistencies , acknowledged that three volunteers developed Grade 3 systemic events defined by the FDA as “ Preventing daily activity and requiring medical intervention.
” Moderna allowed only exceptionally healthy volunteers to participate in the study .
A @ @ @ @ @ @ @ grave injuries in 1.5 billion humans if administered to “ every person on earth ” .
That is the threshold that Gates has established for ending the global lockdown .
Moderna did not explain why it reported positive antibody tests for only eight participants .
These outcomes are particularly disappointing because the most hazardous hurdle for the inoculation is still ahead : challenging participants with wild COVID infection .
Past attempts at developing COVID vaccines have always faltered at this stage as both humans and animals achieved robust antibody response then sickened and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Moderna ’ s press announcement heralded “ Positive Interim Phase 1 findings ” .
I have forwarded that claim to my colleagues in securities law ; FTC rules restrict the amount of lipstick public companies may slather on bad donkeys .
About Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. – His reputation as a resolute defender of the environment stems from a litany of successful legal actions .
Mr. Kennedy was named one of Time magazine ’ s “ Heroes for the Planet ” for his success helping Riverkeeper lead the fight to restore @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s achievement helped spawn 300 Waterkeeper organizations across the globe .
Mr. Kennedy serves as Senior Attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council , Chief Prosecuting Attorney for the Hudson Riverkeeper and President of Waterkeeper Alliance .
He is also a Clinical Professor and Supervising Attorney at Pace University School of Law ’ s Environmental Litigation Clinic and is of counsel to Morgan & Morgan , a nationwide personal injury practice .
He is co-host of Ring of Fire on Air America Radio .
Earlier in his career he served as Assistant District @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has worked on environmental issues across the Americas and has assisted several indigenous tribes in Latin America and Canada in successfully negotiating treaties protecting traditional homelands .
He is credited with leading the fight to protect New York City ’ s water supply .
The New York City watershed agreement , which he negotiated on behalf of environmentalists and New York City watershed consumers , is regarded as an international model in stakeholder consensus negotiations and sustainable development .
Mr. Kennedy is also a devout proponent for vaccine rights , the right to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ publication and public awareness of information needed by parents to make informed decisions for their much more vulnerable children .
A large portion of his related works can be found on the Children ’ s Health Defense website Read more Children ’ s Health Defense articles by RFK , JR. here TLB Editors Note : This is World Mercury Project on steroids !
TLB highly recommends you click on the image below , visit this great website , and do whatever you can to help see this vital forum succeed … for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. and the Children ’ s Health Defense .
CHD is planning many strategies , including legal , in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured .
Your support is essential to CHD ’ s successful mission .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Vaccine Trial Catastrophe: Moderna Vaccine has 20% ‘Serious’ Injury Rate in High Dose Group
By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Chairman, Children’s Health Defense
Despite Moderna’s cheery press release this week, the clinical trial results for its groundbreaking COVID vaccine could not be much worse.
The vaccine, developed and championed by Anthony Fauci and financed by Bill Gates, used an experimental mRNA technology that the two men hoped would allow rapid deployment to meet President Trump’s ambitious “warp speed” time line. Dr. Fauci was so confident of his shot’s safety that he waived ferret and primate studies (Moderna suspiciously reported no specific health data from its mouse studies). That appears to have been a mistake.
… volunteers developed Grade 3 systemic events defined by the FDA as “Preventing daily activity and requiring medical intervention.”
Three of the 15 human guinea pigs in the high dose cohort (250 mcg) suffered a “serious adverse event” within 43 days of receiving Moderna’s jab. Moderna did not release its clinical trial study or raw data, but its press release, which was freighted with inconsistencies, acknowledged that three volunteers developed Grade 3 systemic events defined by the FDA as “Preventing daily activity and requiring medical intervention.”
Moderna allowed only exceptionally healthy volunteers to participate in the study. A vaccine with those reaction rates could cause grave injuries in 1.5 billion humans if administered to “every person on earth”. That is the threshold that Gates has established for ending the global lockdown.
Moderna’s press announcement heralded ‘Positive Interim Phase 1 findings’. I have forwarded that claim to my colleagues in securities law… Moderna’s press announcement heralded ‘Positive Interim Phase 1 findings’. I have forwarded that claim to my colleagues in securities law…
Moderna did not explain why it reported positive antibody tests for only eight participants. These outcomes are particularly disappointing because the most hazardous hurdle for the inoculation is still ahead: challenging participants with wild COVID infection. Past attempts at developing COVID vaccines have always faltered at this stage as both humans and animals achieved robust antibody response then sickened and died when exposed to the wild virus.
Moderna’s press announcement heralded “Positive Interim Phase 1 findings”. I have forwarded that claim to my colleagues in securities law; FTC rules restrict the amount of lipstick public companies may slather on bad donkeys.
••••
About Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. – His reputation as a resolute defender of the environment stems from a litany of successful legal actions. Mr. Kennedy was named one of Time magazine’s “Heroes for the Planet” for his success helping Riverkeeper lead the fight to restore the Hudson River. The group’s achievement helped spawn 300 Waterkeeper organizations across the globe. Mr. Kennedy serves as Senior Attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council, Chief Prosecuting Attorney for the Hudson Riverkeeper and President of Waterkeeper Alliance. He is also a Clinical Professor and Supervising Attorney at Pace University School of Law’s Environmental Litigation Clinic and is of counsel to Morgan & Morgan, a nationwide personal injury practice. He is co-host of Ring of Fire on Air America Radio. Earlier in his career he served as Assistant District Attorney in New York City. He has worked on environmental issues across the Americas and has assisted several indigenous tribes in Latin America and Canada in successfully negotiating treaties protecting traditional homelands. He is credited with leading the fight to protect New York City’s water supply. The New York City watershed agreement, which he negotiated on behalf of environmentalists and New York City watershed consumers, is regarded as an international model in stakeholder consensus negotiations and sustainable development. Mr. Kennedy is also a devout proponent for vaccine rights, the right to chose, informed consent, and the publication and public awareness of information needed by parents to make informed decisions for their much more vulnerable children. A large portion of his related works can be found on the Children’s Health Defense website
••••
Read more Children’s Health Defense articles by RFK, JR. here
••••
••••
TLB Editors Note: This is World Mercury Project on steroids! TLB highly recommends you click on the image below, visit this great website, and do whatever you can to help see this vital forum succeed … for the sake of our children !!! Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-24--The Economic “Reopening” Is A Fake Out

The Economic “Reopening” Is A Fake Out

How does one define an economic “ reopening ” ?
I think most people would say that a reopening means that everything goes back to the way it was before the crisis ; or at least as close as possible .
Most people would also say that a reopening is something that will last .
Simply declaring “ America has reopened ” while keeping many restrictions in place in certain parts of the country is a bit of a farce .
And , reopening with the intention of implementing lockdowns again in a matter of weeks without explaining the situation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the highest order .
For example , states like New York , California , Illinois and New Jersey have extended their lockdowns ; with LA ’ s extension remaining ambiguous after they initially declared restrictions for another 3 months .
New York ’ s lockdown is extended to the end of May ( so far ) .
This is the case in many US states and cities , while rural areas are mostly open .
This is being called a “ partial reopening ” , but is there a purpose behind the uneven @ @ @ @ @ @ @ article ‘ Pandemic And Economic Collapse : The Next 60 Days ’ , the restrictions will continue in major US population centers while rural areas have mostly opened with much fanfare .
The end result of this will be a flood of city dwellers into rural towns looking for relief from more strict lockdown conditions .
In about a month , we should expect new viral clusters in places where there was limited transmission .
I suggest that before the 4th of July holiday , state governments and the Federal government will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ predictable infection spike as an excuse .
This is happening in Northeast China right now – another resurgence has occurred and 100 million people are now subject to quarantine restrictions .
China ’ s reopening is barely two weeks old , and concerns of infection “ flare ups ” were widespread when the announcement was made .
Now the mainstream media seems to be confused ; is China open , or locked down ?
Of course , we may never know how bad the problem is and was in China as their numbers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and suppressed from the beginning , but the point is that the phrase “ reopening ” is meaningless there , just as it will be meaningless here in the US .
This is part of the plan .
The farce of reopenings does indeed have a purpose .
I discuss this in great detail in my article ‘ Waves Of Mutilation : Medical Tyranny And The Cashless Society ’ published in April .
The globalists are clearly the only beneficiaries of this event ; with a world-wide surveillance state now openly on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ digital currency systems , the globalists are either taking advantage of this crisis to push their agenda , or they ENGINEERED the virus and caused the crisis to push their agenda .
In white papers published by globalists at the Imperial College of London as well as MIT , the plan is openly admitted .
They suggest using “ waves ” of economic openings and then lockdowns to control the spread of the virus .
The timelines seem to vary , but in general the models call for a one month open , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is to deliberately increase infections every couple of months in specific regions of a country , then declare economic shutdown and quarantine measures once the spread reaches a certain level ; this is meant to continue until a vaccine is developed , which could take years .
When the globalists at MIT say “ We are not going back to normal , ” this is what they mean .
Right now , the general public ( at least in some parts of the country ) is cheering the reopenings , but what they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reopenings are an illusion .
Restrictions are going to remain in place in many states and cities , while they will be lifted and then re-instituted in others .
In fact , the situation is going to become much worse over time , by design .
The next lockdown , whenever it is announced , will be absolutely devastating to the US economy , which is already in a downward spiral .
The mitigating factors will be how effective central bank stimulus is at stalling the freefall ( not very effective so far @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of small businesses that survive the first lockdown and how many jobs those businesses can bring back to the economy .
The first lockdown may be survivable for a large percentage of Americans and businesses ; the second lockdown will financially destroy all but the most prepared .
And make no mistake , there WILL be many more lockdowns over the next couple of years .
In the meantime , international banks like Wells Fargo and JP Morgan have seen to it that small businesses are hit hard by the crisis by funneling @ @ @ @ @ @ @ larger clients over the smaller businesses that the money was intended to go to .
Of the 300,000 clients of JP Morgan that applied for an emergency loan through the government bailout program , only 18,000 actually received one , and many of these clients were NOT small businesses .
If the cycle of lockdowns continues , small businesses will be wiped off the map .
The elites have rigged the economic game ; they control where every dollar of the bailout money goes , and many of their corporations are the only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ onslaught .
Some of these companies will go down , but in the long run the goal , in my view , is total centralization of production and distribution .
This is exactly what happened during the Great Depression when JP Morgan and other major banks devoured thousands of small local banks across the country and removed them as competitors from the system .
After the depression , banking was completely centralized into the hands of a select few mega-companies .
Today , they are attempting to erase all localized small business competition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ business infrastructure of entire nations and removing all independent competition is only one incentive for the lockdowns to continue .
There is also the process of acclimating the public to the idea that lockdowns are the “ new normal ” .
While I do see resistance in certain parts of the world , including the US , many countries in Asia and Europe have witnessed a rather sheepish response to the idea of medical tyranny .
I also see an immense wildfire of unconstitutional legislation and illegal state measures being rolled out in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by financial circumstances and the virus threat .
Certainly , it appears that most Americans hate the lockdowns .
But will they be fooled by the “ reopening ” into complacency for the next several weeks while the government gets ready to hit them with the next round of restrictions ?
Will they be so caught off guard they won ’ t know how to react ?
Imagine the economic devastation of just one more nationwide lockdown event ?
It will be carnage , and a lot of hope within the population will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two possible paths : Submission or rebellion .
Either the majority of the American people will accept the lockdowns as a new fact of everyday life , or they will become so enraged by the destruction of their economy that they will revolt .
If the intent is to keep the cycle going until a vaccine is introduced , as elitist publications assert , then we have a LONG way to go and this first lockdown was child ’ s play compared to what comes next .
The excuse for the wave model @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and slow the spread of infection over time to avoid overwhelming our medical infrastructure .
But this makes very little sense to me at this stage .
Perhaps within the first month or two of the pandemic this was somewhat logical , so that we could gauge the threat of the virus .
What we know right now is that the virus is at least three times more deadly that the average annual flu ; which is something to be concerned about , but not something we should be destroying our economy over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ buying into Smith ’ s ‘ three times more deadly ’ hypothesis – epidemiologists and infectious disease specialists that we have published have not been saying this , on the contrary . )
Frankly , there ’ s no logic to the wave model unless the agenda is to destroy the economy .
If the goal is to continue infecting the population until everyone has developed an immunity or a vaccine is offered , then why not simply remove all the lockdowns permanently and get it over with now ?
This would result @ @ @ @ @ @ @ run compared to economic collapse .
If the goal is so-called “ herd immunity ” , then we can achieve that much faster through viral transmission than waiting years for a vaccine that may or may not work .
But the elites don ’ t care about “ herd immunity ” ; what they care about is is control .
The vaccine narrative itself is a form of control .
You have to wait for the establishment to save you .
You have to wait for them to allow the economy to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of time , so that you can then be allowed to work or run your business .
You have to wait for permission to live your normal life .
And , if the elites get their way , you won ’ t be given permission until you accept immunity passports , tracking apps and a vaccine .
I will be covering the vaccine issue in a future article , but the underlying message that the public is hearing daily is that you no longer have the power to make decisions for yourself , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the coronavirus is something that should be taken seriously ( to a point ) , the wave model is not an acceptable solution to the problem .
And while many conservatives are looking to Trump to obstruct lockdowns in the future , I would recommend they not hold their breath .
Trump has flip-flopped many times on these issues , including his position on whether or not lockdowns should be left to the states .
With a cabinet overflowing with globalists and banking elites , I would not put much hope in intervention @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be fooled by the reopening .
It is not real because it is not meant to last .
It is a steam valve to calm public outrage and to condition us to periodic tyranny .
The elites believe that we will eventually acclimate to lockdowns as long as we have a reopening to look forward to a couple months down the road .
They believe that our tendency to rebel will be suppressed by false hopes that the next reopening will be a permanent reopening .
They believe that after 18 months or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will be so desperate for normalcy that we will do anything to get it , including willingly giving up every last ounce of freedom we have left .
This is the true purpose of the pandemic .
If you would like to support the work that Alt-Market does while also receiving content on advanced tactics for defeating the globalist agenda , subscribe to our exclusive newsletter The Wild Bunch Dispatch .
Learn more about it HERE .
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com

How does one define an economic “reopening”?
I think most people would say that a reopening means that everything goes back to the way it was before the crisis; or at least as close as possible. Most people would also say that a reopening is something that will last. Simply declaring “America has reopened” while keeping many restrictions in place in certain parts of the country is a bit of a farce. And, reopening with the intention of implementing lockdowns again in a matter of weeks without explaining the situation to the public is a scam of the highest order.
For example, states like New York, California, Illinois and New Jersey have extended their lockdowns; with LA’s extension remaining ambiguous after they initially declared restrictions for another 3 months. New York’s lockdown is extended to the end of May (so far). This is the case in many US states and cities, while rural areas are mostly open. This is being called a “partial reopening”, but is there a purpose behind the uneven approach?
As I predicted in my article ‘Pandemic And Economic Collapse: The Next 60 Days’, the restrictions will continue in major US population centers while rural areas have mostly opened with much fanfare. The end result of this will be a flood of city dwellers into rural towns looking for relief from more strict lockdown conditions. In about a month, we should expect new viral clusters in places where there was limited transmission. I suggest that before the 4th of July holiday, state governments and the Federal government will be talking about new lockdowns, using the predictable infection spike as an excuse.
This is happening in Northeast China right now – another resurgence has occurred and 100 million people are now subject to quarantine restrictions. China’s reopening is barely two weeks old, and concerns of infection “flare ups” were widespread when the announcement was made. Now the mainstream media seems to be confused; is China open, or locked down? Of course, we may never know how bad the problem is and was in China as their numbers have been shown to be utterly rigged and suppressed from the beginning, but the point is that the phrase “reopening” is meaningless there, just as it will be meaningless here in the US.
This is part of the plan. The farce of reopenings does indeed have a purpose. I discuss this in great detail in my article ‘Waves Of Mutilation: Medical Tyranny And The Cashless Society’ published in April. The globalists are clearly the only beneficiaries of this event; with a world-wide surveillance state now openly on the table along with an accelerated shift into digital currency systems, the globalists are either taking advantage of this crisis to push their agenda, or they ENGINEERED the virus and caused the crisis to push their agenda.
In white papers published by globalists at the Imperial College of London as well as MIT, the plan is openly admitted. They suggest using “waves” of economic openings and then lockdowns to control the spread of the virus. The timelines seem to vary, but in general the models call for a one month open, two months closed cycle. The goal is to deliberately increase infections every couple of months in specific regions of a country, then declare economic shutdown and quarantine measures once the spread reaches a certain level; this is meant to continue until a vaccine is developed, which could take years.
When the globalists at MIT say “We are not going back to normal,” this is what they mean. Right now, the general public (at least in some parts of the country) is cheering the reopenings, but what they don’t realize is that the reopenings are an illusion. Restrictions are going to remain in place in many states and cities, while they will be lifted and then re-instituted in others. In fact, the situation is going to become much worse over time, by design.
The next lockdown, whenever it is announced, will be absolutely devastating to the US economy, which is already in a downward spiral. The mitigating factors will be how effective central bank stimulus is at stalling the freefall (not very effective so far). Other factors include the percentage of small businesses that survive the first lockdown and how many jobs those businesses can bring back to the economy. The first lockdown may be survivable for a large percentage of Americans and businesses; the second lockdown will financially destroy all but the most prepared. And make no mistake, there WILL be many more lockdowns over the next couple of years.
In the meantime, international banks like Wells Fargo and JP Morgan have seen to it that small businesses are hit hard by the crisis by funneling bailout money and paycheck loans to their larger clients over the smaller businesses that the money was intended to go to. Of the 300,000 clients of JP Morgan that applied for an emergency loan through the government bailout program, only 18,000 actually received one, and many of these clients were NOT small businesses.
If the cycle of lockdowns continues, small businesses will be wiped off the map. The elites have rigged the economic game; they control where every dollar of the bailout money goes, and many of their corporations are the only institutions that are equipped to survive the onslaught. Some of these companies will go down, but in the long run the goal, in my view, is total centralization of production and distribution.
This is exactly what happened during the Great Depression when JP Morgan and other major banks devoured thousands of small local banks across the country and removed them as competitors from the system. After the depression, banking was completely centralized into the hands of a select few mega-companies. Today, they are attempting to erase all localized small business competition to international corporations.
Taking over the business infrastructure of entire nations and removing all independent competition is only one incentive for the lockdowns to continue. There is also the process of acclimating the public to the idea that lockdowns are the “new normal”. While I do see resistance in certain parts of the world, including the US, many countries in Asia and Europe have witnessed a rather sheepish response to the idea of medical tyranny. I also see an immense wildfire of unconstitutional legislation and illegal state measures being rolled out in the US while the public is distracted by financial circumstances and the virus threat.
Certainly, it appears that most Americans hate the lockdowns. But will they be fooled by the “reopening” into complacency for the next several weeks while the government gets ready to hit them with the next round of restrictions? Will they be so caught off guard they won’t know how to react? Imagine the economic devastation of just one more nationwide lockdown event? It will be carnage, and a lot of hope within the population will be lost.
This will lead to two possible paths: Submission or rebellion. Either the majority of the American people will accept the lockdowns as a new fact of everyday life, or they will become so enraged by the destruction of their economy that they will revolt.
If the intent is to keep the cycle going until a vaccine is introduced, as elitist publications assert, then we have a LONG way to go and this first lockdown was child’s play compared to what comes next.
The excuse for the wave model will be that they need to control and slow the spread of infection over time to avoid overwhelming our medical infrastructure. But this makes very little sense to me at this stage. Perhaps within the first month or two of the pandemic this was somewhat logical, so that we could gauge the threat of the virus. What we know right now is that the virus is at least three times more deadly that the average annual flu; which is something to be concerned about, but not something we should be destroying our economy over. (ER: we are not buying into Smith’s ‘three times more deadly’ hypothesis – epidemiologists and infectious disease specialists that we have published have not been saying this, on the contrary.)
Frankly, there’s no logic to the wave model unless the agenda is to destroy the economy.
If the goal is to continue infecting the population until everyone has developed an immunity or a vaccine is offered, then why not simply remove all the lockdowns permanently and get it over with now? This would result in far less deaths in the long run compared to economic collapse. If the goal is so-called “herd immunity”, then we can achieve that much faster through viral transmission than waiting years for a vaccine that may or may not work.
But the elites don’t care about “herd immunity”; what they care about is is control. The vaccine narrative itself is a form of control. You have to wait for the establishment to save you. You have to wait for them to allow the economy to be opened, even for a short period of time, so that you can then be allowed to work or run your business. You have to wait for permission to live your normal life. And, if the elites get their way, you won’t be given permission until you accept immunity passports, tracking apps and a vaccine.
I will be covering the vaccine issue in a future article, but the underlying message that the public is hearing daily is that you no longer have the power to make decisions for yourself, you must wait for instructions. While the coronavirus is something that should be taken seriously (to a point), the wave model is not an acceptable solution to the problem.
And while many conservatives are looking to Trump to obstruct lockdowns in the future, I would recommend they not hold their breath. Trump has flip-flopped many times on these issues, including his position on whether or not lockdowns should be left to the states. With a cabinet overflowing with globalists and banking elites, I would not put much hope in intervention from the White House.
Do not be fooled by the reopening. It is not real because it is not meant to last. It is a steam valve to calm public outrage and to condition us to periodic tyranny. The elites believe that we will eventually acclimate to lockdowns as long as we have a reopening to look forward to a couple months down the road. They believe that our tendency to rebel will be suppressed by false hopes that the next reopening will be a permanent reopening. They believe that after 18 months or more of the wave model, we will be so desperate for normalcy that we will do anything to get it, including willingly giving up every last ounce of freedom we have left.
This is the true purpose of the pandemic.
* * * * * * * * *
If you would like to support the work that Alt-Market does while also receiving content on advanced tactics for defeating the globalist agenda, subscribe to our exclusive newsletter The Wild Bunch Dispatch. Learn more about it HERE.
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-24--President Trump’s Latest Web Site: YouAintBlack.com

( TLB ) editor : We don ’ t know about you , but it is still hard to believe that Sleepy Joe Biden actually decided to run for POTUS .
And even more surprising is he is still running .
And to top that off , he thinks he can win !
Someone took the “ Little Engine That Could ” to heart… .
I think I can , I think I can .
Joe Biden brings back memories of The Great Ballantine each and every time he makes a political Gaff… This follows his last hit : TheTruthOverFacts.com @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Truth Over Facts ” Exposed The press And Tricked Them Into Mocking Biden ( TLB ) published this report from IWB with our appreciation to their staff for compiling this most informative presentation .
Our thanks to Danny Hustle for The Great Ballantine clip .
~ ( TLB ) More about Biden from The Liberty Beacon : Joe Biden emerges from 6 DAYS in hiding with stumbling video stream Nine Reasons Why You Should Support Joe Biden For President The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .
Disclaimer : The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , text , graphics , images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction .
Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice , diagnosis or treatment .

(TLB) editor: We don’t know about you, but it is still hard to believe that Sleepy Joe Biden actually decided to run for POTUS. And even more surprising is he is still running. And to top that off, he thinks he can win!
Someone took the “Little Engine That Could” to heart…. I think I can, I think I can.
Joe Biden brings back memories of The Great Ballantine each and every time he makes a political appearance Gaff…
*********
President Trump’s Latest Web Site: YouAintBlack.com
by IWB
President Trump’s Latest Web Site: YouAintBlack.com
This follows his last hit: TheTruthOverFacts.com
Trump’s MOST EPIC Troll Ever “Truth Over Facts” Exposed The
press And Tricked Them Into Mocking Biden
*********
(TLB) published this report from IWB with our appreciation to their staff for compiling this most informative presentation.
Our thanks to Danny Hustle for The Great Ballantine clip. ~(TLB)
More about Biden from The Liberty Beacon:
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.