thelibertybeacon--2020-12-28--Our Obsession with Symptom Relief: ‘Death By Medicine’ with Dr. Gary Null

Our Obsession with Symptom Relief : ‘ Death By Medicine ’ – Dr. Gary Null Traditional medicine has become “ symptom relief ” as opposed to reversing disease and aging and patients have increasingly become profit centers for mainstream doctors .
The pathology of medicine is “ what do I do when I ’ m sick ?
” instead of “ what can I do to stay healthy ?
” In fact , one of the leading causes of death in the United States is iatrogenic medicine – which is illness caused by medical treatments , pharmaceutical drugs , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his guest Gary Null , PhD .
as they discuss his book “ Death by Medicine ” and numerous other topics including the overuse of prescription drugs and the neurotoxicity of vaccines .
Listen : For more information about Dr. Null visit www.prn.fm or www.garynull.com .
His books are also available on Amazon ( TLB ) published this report from 21WIRE with our sincere gratitude for this health perspective .
YOU CAN HELP SUPPORT 21WIRE ’ S WINTER FUNDRAISING DRIVE HERE The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB @ @ @ @ @ @ @ owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized @ @ @ @ @ @ @ making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Our Obsession with Symptom Relief: ‘Death By Medicine’ – Dr. Gary Null
Traditional medicine has become “symptom relief” as opposed to reversing disease and aging and patients have increasingly become profit centers for mainstream doctors.
The pathology of medicine is “what do I do when I’m sick?” instead of “what can I do to stay healthy?”
In fact, one of the leading causes of death in the United States is iatrogenic medicine – which is illness caused by medical treatments, pharmaceutical drugs, and even vaccines.
Join Dr. Hotze and his guest Gary Null, PhD. as they discuss his book “Death by Medicine” and numerous other topics including the overuse of prescription drugs and the neurotoxicity of vaccines. Listen:
For more information about Dr. Null visit www.prn.fm or www.garynull.com . His books are also available on Amazon
*********
(TLB) published this report from 21WIRE with our sincere gratitude for this health perspective.
Header featured image credit: https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health
READ MORE VACCINE NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Vaccine Files
YOU CAN HELP SUPPORT 21WIRE’S WINTER FUNDRAISING DRIVE HERE
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-28--Freeze Sperm Before COVID Vaccine To Protect Fertility – Says University of Miami Researchers

Researchers at the University of Miami have recommended men to have a fertility evaluation before receiving the COVID vaccine and to consider to freeze their sperm before vaccination in order to protect their fertility .
The University of Miami is investigating the possible effects of the coronavirus vaccine on male fertility .
Lead researcher Dr. Ranjith Ramasamy , a reproductive urologist with U Health , initiated an earlier study which found the virus was present in the testicles for up to six months following infection .
That spurred his team to question the virus ’ effect on sperm and reproduction @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the potential impact of the vaccine as well .
He said that study participants must have a fertility evaluation before receiving the vaccine .
To protect fertility , some men may want to consider freezing their sperm prior to vaccination .
“ We ’ re evaluating the sperm parameters and quality before the vaccine and after the vaccine .
From the biology of the COVID vaccine we believe it shouldn ’ t affect fertility but we want to do the study to make sure that men who want to have kids in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ safe to go ahead and get the vaccine , ” Ramasamy said .
Earlier , almost 3,150 people who were administered the COVID-19 vaccine were paralyzed and were “ unable to perform normal daily activities , unable to work and required care from doctor or health care professional .
”

ER Editor: We take this opportunity to remind readers that female infertility may also be a problem with the new gene-altering mRNA vaccine from Pfizer. See Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon Request a Stop of ALL Corona Vaccination Studies, Call to SIGN THE PETITION. Of note: The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women. In the report below, which links to Local10 news in the US, no particular vaccine is being singled out as a problem. The assumption must be that ALL covid vaccines are a potential problem for men. ******** Freeze Sperm Before COVID Vaccine To Protect Fertility – Says University of Miami Researchers
Researchers at the University of Miami have recommended men to have a fertility evaluation before receiving the COVID vaccine and to consider to freeze their sperm before vaccination in order to protect their fertility. The University of Miami is investigating the possible effects of the coronavirus vaccine on male fertility. Lead researcher Dr. Ranjith Ramasamy, a reproductive urologist with U Health, initiated an earlier study which found the virus was present in the testicles for up to six months following infection. That spurred his team to question the virus’ effect on sperm and reproduction. His team is now looking at the potential impact of the vaccine as well. He said that study participants must have a fertility evaluation before receiving the vaccine. To protect fertility, some men may want to consider freezing their sperm prior to vaccination. “We’re evaluating the sperm parameters and quality before the vaccine and after the vaccine. From the biology of the COVID vaccine we believe it shouldn’t affect fertility but we want to do the study to make sure that men who want to have kids in the future to assure them it’s safe to go ahead and get the vaccine,” Ramasamy said. SEE VIDEO HERE Earlier, almost 3,150 people who were administered the COVID-19 vaccine were paralyzed and were “unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work and required care from doctor or health care professional.”
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-28--78 Year Old Woman France’s First mRNA Vaccine Recipient and It’s a Shocker

ER Editor : As with the first UK vaccine , it was an elderly lady who was the first guinea pig in France yesterday .
Because that ’ s all she can be called .
Informed consent and human dignity just went out the window .
Twitter reaction was pretty prompt after one Mauricette got her vaccine live on camera .
Former presidential candidate of the UPR Party , Francois Asselineau said it best ( Twitter ) , a tweet which contains a short video that ’ s worth watching even if you can ’ t understand the French : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , 78 years old , the first French to get vaccinated with the mRNA Pfizer vaccine .
But they hide the fact that she didn ’ t know she was going to be the first !
We hear her in effect say at the 8 second mark , ‘ Ah ?
I need a vaccine ?
’ That ’ s called an abuse of the weak .
( ER : Which is a criminal act under French law … ) In passing , French broadsheet Le Figaro tweeted a poll question yesterday , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of French than before ( 60 % ) say they will NOT be getting the vaccine ( although this result is skewed according to the readership of Le Figaro ) : Translation : Your Opinion – Are you going to get vaccinated against Covid-19 ?
Robin Monotti tweeted out yesterday about Italian employees in care homes refusing the vaccine .
The article he cites is behind a paywall : Covid-19 : A 78-year-old woman received her first dose of Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine in France A 78-year-old woman was the first person in France to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hospital in Sevran ( Seine-Saint-Denis ) .
The government has set a goal of one million vaccinated older people by the end of February .
“ I am moved , ” said Mauricette on December 27 , 2020 .
This former household helper was the first to be vaccinated in France , at around 11 am in the long-term care unit of the René-Muret hospital in Sevran .
“ Things are heating up !
” , launched this former inhabitant of Le Bourget after receiving the injection of the vaccine developed by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ A 65-year-old cardiologist , Jean-Jacques Monsuez , was then vaccinated shortly before 11:20 am .
About twenty elderly people and caregivers are scheduled to receive the ‘ Comirnaty ’ vaccine at this symbolic launch of the French vaccination campaign , in Sevran and then at the geriatric center in Champmaillot , part of the Dijon University Hospital .
The government has set a target of one million of the oldest and most vulnerable , individuals and caregivers in the 7,000 EHPAD ( ER : old people ’ s homes ) and other related @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of February .
( ER : We have questioned official government statistics on this virus since the beginning across the board .
We have no confidence in the figures that follow , therefore , especially as nobody seems to be getting flu anymore . )
In total , the coronavirus epidemic has caused 62,427 deaths in France , including 159 in the last 24 hours , according to data provided by the authorities on December 25 .
In detail , 112 new patients were admitted to intensive care within 24 hours ( compared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2,616 Covid-19 patients are currently hospitalized in intensive care , according to data from Public Health France .
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

ER Editor: As with the first UK vaccine, it was an elderly lady who was the first guinea pig in France yesterday. Because that’s all she can be called. Informed consent and human dignity just went out the window. Twitter reaction was pretty prompt after one Mauricette got her vaccine live on camera.
Former presidential candidate of the UPR Party, Francois Asselineau said it best (Twitter), a tweet which contains a short video that’s worth watching even if you can’t understand the French:
Translation: The media are advertising Mauricette, 78 years old, the first French to get vaccinated with the mRNA Pfizer vaccine. But they hide the fact that she didn’t know she was going to be the first! We hear her in effect say at the 8 second mark, ‘Ah? I need a vaccine?’ That’s called an abuse of the weak. (ER: Which is a criminal act under French law …)
In passing, French broadsheet Le Figaro tweeted a poll question yesterday, too, and an even bigger number of French than before (60%) say they will NOT be getting the vaccine (although this result is skewed according to the readership of Le Figaro):
Translation: Your Opinion – Are you going to get vaccinated against Covid-19?
Robin Monotti tweeted out yesterday about Italian employees in care homes refusing the vaccine. The article he cites is behind a paywall:
********
Covid-19: A 78-year-old woman received her first dose of Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine in France
RT France
A 78-year-old woman was the first person in France to be vaccinated against Covid-19 at the René-Muret hospital in Sevran (Seine-Saint-Denis). The government has set a goal of one million vaccinated older people by the end of February.
“I am moved,” said Mauricette on December 27, 2020. This former household helper was the first to be vaccinated in France, at around 11 am in the long-term care unit of the René-Muret hospital in Sevran.
“Things are heating up!”, launched this former inhabitant of Le Bourget after receiving the injection of the vaccine developed by the American Pfizer and the German BioNTech. A 65-year-old cardiologist, Jean-Jacques Monsuez, was then vaccinated shortly before 11:20 am.
About twenty elderly people and caregivers are scheduled to receive the ‘Comirnaty’ vaccine at this symbolic launch of the French vaccination campaign, in Sevran and then at the geriatric center in Champmaillot, part of the Dijon University Hospital.
The government has set a target of one million of the oldest and most vulnerable, individuals and caregivers in the 7,000 EHPAD (ER: old people’s homes) and other related facilities to be vaccinated by the end of February.
(ER: We have questioned official government statistics on this virus since the beginning across the board. We have no confidence in the figures that follow, therefore, especially as nobody seems to be getting flu anymore.) In total, the coronavirus epidemic has caused 62,427 deaths in France, including 159 in the last 24 hours, according to data provided by the authorities on December 25. In detail, 112 new patients were admitted to intensive care within 24 hours (compared to 186 on December 24). 2,616 Covid-19 patients are currently hospitalized in intensive care, according to data from Public Health France.
************
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-28--Another Covid lie blown out of the water as “reasons to be fearful” evaporate

Much of the strategy of lockdowns and other attacks on our communities has depended upon the alleged pheneomenon of asymptomatic transmission – the contention that people who have tested positive for Covid19 but have no symptoms ( ie , are not actually ill ) – which comprises about 80 % – can still carry and transmit the disease to others .
In other words , you can have the bug and not know it and then unwittingly infect somebody else with it .
This then provides the pretext for shutting down schools , masks , distancing , the isolation , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ plus instilling in healthy people ( which includes vast numbers of children ) the idea that they could “ kill their grandmother ” without knowing it .
That pretext in turn is based on this scenatio : • they have no symptoms • yet “ because asymptomatic people can still infect others ” they have to be isolated and so on .
But , of course , most of the positives are themselves false .
The useleness of the widely used PCR test for reliably detecting the presence of the virus in anyone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government has simply ignored that and persisted with the flawed tests and the egregiously bogus stats based thereon tells you all you need to know about the honesty of the subversives stage-managing this fiasco .
Even where the “ positive ” is not false , it is still only detecting the presence of minute remnants of the DNA of past but long gone infections with coronaviruses such as flu and “ common cold ” viruses .
And now we discover , as the folowing article goes over , that research has proven that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also FALSE .
It is easy to understand however that much of the apparently docile compliance of some of the public with the measures derived from the Covid Terror narrative hinges on the implanted fear that they might unwittingly infect and thus harm others , that there is a hidden creeping menace out there that they can ’ t see and which is spreading even though they and hardly anyobody they know is actually ill !
As the article mentions , the tactic of the Covid Terror Faction infiltrated into our governments , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ narrative out of the water , is to simply ignore them and , with the help of collaborators in the media , to prevent that vital information reaching the public .
Indeed once can observe that a great deal of time and effort is expended by the Covid Terror Faction and its collaborators to control what information reaches the attention of the public .
When you take the layers of fasehoods that comprise this so-called pandemic and strip them away , there is virtually nothing left .
Except the suspicious obsession of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as many people to submit to a dodgy vaccine as quickly as possible – preferably before anybody has time to think or ask awkward questions , such as : • what is in it ?
• what are its short medium and long term adverse effects ?
• why are you really in such a tearing hurry to inject the populace with it ?
Asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 didn ’ t occur at all , study of 10 million finds Only 300 asymptomatic cases in the study of nearly 10 million were discovered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for COVID-19 .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Introduction
by Watchdog
Much of the strategy of lockdowns and other attacks on our communities has depended upon the alleged pheneomenon of asymptomatic transmission – the contention that people who have tested positive for Covid19 but have no symptoms (ie, are not actually ill) – which comprises about 80% – can still carry and transmit the disease to others.
In other words, you can have the bug and not know it and then unwittingly infect somebody else with it.
This then provides the pretext for shutting down schools, masks, distancing, the isolation, lockdown and so on of healthy people plus instilling in healthy people (which includes vast numbers of children) the idea that they could “kill their grandmother” without knowing it. That pretext in turn is based on this scenatio:
the person tests positive
they have no symptoms
yet “because asymptomatic people can still infect others” they have to be isolated and so on.
But, of course, most of the positives are themselves false.
The useleness of the widely used PCR test for reliably detecting the presence of the virus in anyone has been thoroughly exposed. That the government has simply ignored that and persisted with the flawed tests and the egregiously bogus stats based thereon tells you all you need to know about the honesty of the subversives stage-managing this fiasco.
Even where the “positive” is not false, it is still only detecting the presence of minute remnants of the DNA of past but long gone infections with coronaviruses such as flu and “common cold” viruses.
And now we discover, as the folowing article goes over, that research has proven that the “asymptomatic infection” contention is also FALSE.
It is easy to understand however that much of the apparently docile compliance of some of the public with the measures derived from the Covid Terror narrative hinges on the implanted fear that they might unwittingly infect and thus harm others, that there is a hidden creeping menace out there that they can’t see and which is spreading even though they and hardly anyobody they know is actually ill!
As the article mentions, the tactic of the Covid Terror Faction infiltrated into our governments, when faced with findings that blow their narrative out of the water, is to simply ignore them and, with the help of collaborators in the media, to prevent that vital information reaching the public. Indeed once can observe that a great deal of time and effort is expended by the Covid Terror Faction and its collaborators to control what information reaches the attention of the public.
When you take the layers of fasehoods that comprise this so-called pandemic and strip them away, there is virtually nothing left.
Except the suspicious obsession of the Vax Faction in our government with getting as many people to submit to a dodgy vaccine as quickly as possible – preferably before anybody has time to think or ask awkward questions, such as:
what is in it?
what are its short medium and long term adverse effects?
why are you really in such a tearing hurry to inject the populace with it?
Enjoy the article.
Asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 didn’t occur at all, study of 10 million finds
by Michael Haynes
Only 300 asymptomatic cases in the study of nearly 10 million were discovered, and none of those tested positive for COVID-19.
LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here. ANALYSIS WUHAN, China, December 23, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – A study of almost 10 million people in Wuhan, China, found that asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 did not occur at all, thus undermining the need for lockdowns, which are built on the premise of the virus being unwittingly spread by infectious, asymptomatic people. Published in November in the scientific journal Nature Communications, the paper was compiled by 19 scientists, mainly from the Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan, but also from scientific institutions across China as well as in the U.K. and Australia. It focused on the residents of Wuhan, ground zero for COVID-19, where 9,899,828 people took part in a screening program between May 14 and June 1, which provided clear results as to the possibility of any asymptomatic transmission of the virus. Asymptomatic transmission has been the underlying justification of lockdowns enforced all across the world. The most recent guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) still states that the virus “can be spread by people who do not have symptoms.” In fact, the CDC claimed that asymptomatic people “are estimated to account for more than 50 percent of transmissions.” U.K. Health Secretary Matt Hancock also promoted this message, explaining that the concept of asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 led to the U.K. advocating masks and referring to the “problem of asymptomatic transmission.” It stated that out of the nearly 10 million people in the study, “300 asymptomatic cases” were found. Contact tracing was then carried out and of those 300, no cases of COVID-19 were detected in any of them. “A total of 1,174 close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases were traced, and they all tested negative for the COVID-19.” Both the asymptomatic patients and their contacts were placed in isolation for two weeks, and after the fortnight, the results remained the same. “None of detected positive cases or their close contacts became symptomatic or newly confirmed with COVID-19 during the isolation period.” Further evidence showed that “virus cultures” in the positive and repositive asymptomatic cases were all negative, “indicating no ‘viable virus’ in positive cases detected in this study.” Ages of those found to be asymptomatic ranged between 10 and 89, with the asymptomatic positive rate being “lowest in children or adolescents aged 17 and below” and highest rate found among people older than 60. The study also made the realization that due to a weakening of the virus itself, “newly infected persons were more likely to be asymptomatic and with a lower viral load than earlier infected cases.” These results are not without precedent. In June, Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, shed doubt upon asymptomatic transmission. Speaking at a press conference, Van Kerkhove explained, “From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual.” She then repeated the words “It’s very rare,” but despite her word choice of “rare,” Van Kerkhove could not point to a single case of asymptomatic transmission, noting that numerous reports “were not finding secondary transmission onward.” Her comments went against the predominant narrative justifying lockdowns, and at the time the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) highlighted that “she undermined the last bit of rationale there could be for lockdowns, mandated masks, social distancing regulation, and the entire apparatus of compulsion and coercion under which we’ve lived for three months.” Swift to act, the WHO performed a U-turn, and the next day Van Kerkhove then declared that asymptomatic transmission was a “really complex question … We don’t actually have that answer yet.” “I think that that’s misunderstanding to state that asymptomatic transmission globally is very rare. I was referring to a small subset of studies,” she added. However, the new Wuhan study seems to present solid, scientific evidence that asymptomatic transmission is not just rare but nonexistent. Given that it found “no evidence that the identified asymptomatic positive cases were infectious,” the study raises important questions about lockdowns. Commenting on the study, The Conservative Tree House noted that “all of the current lockdown regulations, mask wearing requirements and social distancing rules/decrees are based on a complete fallacy of false assumptions.” The evidence presented in the study shows that “‘very rare’ actually means ‘never’ asymptomatic spread just doesn’t happen – EVER.” Such a large scientific study of 10 million people should not be overlooked, Jeffrey Tucker argued in the AIER, as it should be “huge news,” paving the way “to open up everything immediately.” Yet media reports have been virtually nonexistent and “ignored,” a fact that Tucker explained: “The lockdown lobby ignores whatever contradicts their narrative, preferring unverified anecdotes over an actual scientific study of 10 million residents in what was the world’s first major hotspot for the disease we are trying to manage.” The recent findings should enable society to reopen once more, according to the AIER. Without asymptomatic transmission, “the whole basis for post-curve-flattening lockdowns,” life should resume and “we could take comfort in our normal intuition that healthy people can get out and about with no risk to others. “We keep hearing about how we should follow the science,” Tucker added. “The claim is tired by now. We know what’s really happening.” He closed his commentary with the question: “With solid evidence that asymptomatic spread is nonsense, we have to ask: Who is making decisions and why?” The above article is from Lifesite News. Visit Lifesite News now for more great articles. Their excellent and extensive Covid19 resources page is here.
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-28--What Denying Election Fraud Accomplishes

There were voluminous reports , from eyewitnesses and experts , of widespread election fraud in the so-called battle states and beyond .
Specific allegations were made , and evidence of election rules violations and statistical anomalies were collected .
Yet the courts refused to listen to virtually all witnesses and experts , rejected most of the evidence , and refused to subpoena more evidence requested by the plaintiffs .
Many state government officials and some top representatives of companies supplying voting machines and software categorically denied any election fraud .
So , on the one hand , there is plenty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ observed election fraud took place during the 2020 presidential elections .
On the other hand , all we have are assurances of the election fraud–deniers that there was no election fraud , which were later changed to admissions that although election fraud did take place , it wasn ’ t large enough to sway the results .
No verifiable facts that would clearly invalidate the specific election fraud allegations were presented to the public as of time of this writing , while quite a lot of obstruction of investigations , like denials to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ examination by independent experts , took place .
Some of this obstruction had all appearances of a cover-up .
I must say that anyone who , knowing the above , claims that Joe Biden has received required majorities of legitimate votes to become a duly elected president is either stupid or willing to cover up the truth about the rigged elections that we have allowed to continue in America .
I am not going to analyze the stupid .
However , I would like to look into possible reasons why an intelligent observer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if it did take place .
There were many individuals and groups who for more than four years have been desperately trying to stop Mr. Trump from becoming the president in 2016 and then , after his inauguration , to remove him by any means available .
False charges of his collusion with Russia and other impeachable offenses were being thrown on him and investigated vigorously for most of his term as the president , to the tune of mass propaganda from the majority of the “ mainstream ” media portraying him as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ profiteer , a destroyer of the world order , and such .
Obviously , the anti-Trumpers are not going to allow anybody to question the validity of the election of Mr. Joe Biden .
Although any individual voter is free to vote for whomever he wants , when government officers let their personal political preferences override their official duty , then prerequisites for corruption are met .
For instance , if judges or election officials refuse to seriously consider election fraud because of their affiliation with or support of the Democrat Party , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the Democrat Party has a monopoly on this kind of wrongdoing , but it has gained notoriety as the party who cheats the most and the best .
Unfortunately , many of those in positions of power who could order serious and impartial investigations of the alleged election fraud and possible overturning of the results , if proven fraudulent or invalid , were concerned with a threat of violent riots of left ’ s militant organizations , like BLM and Antifa .
Some could have been trying to save our country a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ while others were afraid for their own safety .
As much as I disagreed with their decision to support the cover-up of election fraud , their position had a dose of rationality .
Imagine that you are a judge or a justice , and you have a family to feed and protect .
Wouldn ’ t you be concerned that your controversial judgment may irritate BLM or Antifa into bringing their “ protests ” to your neighborhood and trying to harm your spouse and your children or burn down your home ?
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Antifa earlier this year , the well orchestrated election fraud would not have stood a chance to be left uninvestigated .
If a thorough investigation proved that the results were invalid , Mr. Joe Biden would not stand a chance of being declared the winner .
The above realization implies that we are seeing a dawn of mobocracy in the U.S. as a replacement for our Constitutional Republic as a form of government .
That spells out bad news for virtually everyone , including even the mobsters .
We need brave leaders @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Americans in front of these leaders ’ personal safety and political interest .
By doing so , the election fraud–denier makes himself a perfect target for all kinds of predators , social parasites , and control freaks .
He does not realize that losing a battle does not require capitulation of the war , and that losing a war does not require surrendering the nation to the hostile power that waged it .
Some election fraud–deniers of this kind go even as far as to insist that if we can not ( or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them ( the election fraudsters and power-grabbers ) , then we may as well join them .
That may be a nice little trick that may work , to some extent , in low-stage games , but not when submission of once free people to the power of the government that is not accountable to them is at stake .
Such submission is almost always permanent , and the longer it lasts , the more difficult it is to abolish .
Clearly , if the president is determined not by the will of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Constitution , but by rigged elections under control of determined and ruthless cabal , then the president , and other elected officials , is accountable to the cabal and not to the voters .
Surely , many politicians who were not enthusiastic about how the elections 2020 were carried on , wanted to protect a ” higher good , ” a public trust that our elections are free , fair , and honest .
As much as such may seem on its surface a noble concern , it is based on a fallacy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elections integrity is far more important that the actual integrity of the elections , which it is not .
For why would We the People agree to be cheated of our right to elect the president of our choice just to maintain appearances that we were not cheated of that fundamental right ?
True , our Constitutional Republic has not been perfect , yet so many of us wholeheartedly support it .
But among other strengths , it has an exceptional ability to self-repair .
That is definitely not a feature of any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , it has a natural tendency to get worse and worse until it is overthrown by its victims — a costly and destructive option that is less than certain to deliver the desirable results .
Moreover , concerns that any serious investigation of election fraud might erode public trust in our elections are in many cases hypocritical , as they often come from the very groups and individuals who were not concerned with weakening of the presidency by endless investigations of false charges against him or who spread the mass anti-Trump propaganda that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the President of the U.S. Why would we , without serious and thorough investigation , accept categorical assurances by election fraud–deniers despite mounting evidence that organized election fraud took place in 2020 and was widespread , while President Trump ’ S categorical assurances that he did not collude with Russians were deemed not enough so that all the false allegations against him had to be seriously and thoroughly investigated ?
There is no good reason for us to accept these assurances .
The Constitutional laws and processes that make for this Republics @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of sweeping power by the transnational cabal that has long considered the U.S. as an obstacle in imposition of their rule over the world .
Never mind that American $ 20+ trillion a year economy for grabs by the said control freaks would have been a sufficient reason in its own right .
Now , it ’ s up to us , the American people , to resist the cabal and defend our freedom and the Constitution that stands for it .
As George Orwell wrote in 1984 , “ [ w ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ power with the intention of relinquishing it.
” So will our future rulers not relinquish the power they grabbed with 2020 election fraud , if we let them have their way .

What Denying Election Fraud Accomplishes
Commentary by: Mark Andrew Dwyer
There were voluminous reports, from eyewitnesses and experts, of widespread election fraud in the so-called battle states and beyond. Specific allegations were made, and evidence of election rules violations and statistical anomalies were collected. Yet the courts refused to listen to virtually all witnesses and experts, rejected most of the evidence, and refused to subpoena more evidence requested by the plaintiffs. Many state government officials and some top representatives of companies supplying voting machines and software categorically denied any election fraud.
So, on the one hand, there is plenty of evidence strongly suggesting that the widely observed election fraud took place during the 2020 presidential elections. On the other hand, all we have are assurances of the election fraud–deniers that there was no election fraud, which were later changed to admissions that although election fraud did take place, it wasn’t large enough to sway the results. No verifiable facts that would clearly invalidate the specific election fraud allegations were presented to the public as of time of this writing, while quite a lot of obstruction of investigations, like denials to subject the vote-counting software and hardware to examination by independent experts, took place. Some of this obstruction had all appearances of a cover-up.
I must say that anyone who, knowing the above, claims that Joe Biden has received required majorities of legitimate votes to become a duly elected president is either stupid or willing to cover up the truth about the rigged elections that we have allowed to continue in America.
I am not going to analyze the stupid. However, I would like to look into possible reasons why an intelligent observer would opt for cover-up of election fraud if it did take place.
Reason 1: The election fraud–denier wanted President Trump to be removed from the Oval Office.
There were many individuals and groups who for more than four years have been desperately trying to stop Mr. Trump from becoming the president in 2016 and then, after his inauguration, to remove him by any means available. False charges of his collusion with Russia and other impeachable offenses were being thrown on him and investigated vigorously for most of his term as the president, to the tune of mass propaganda from the majority of the “mainstream” media portraying him as a monster, a dictator, a profiteer, a destroyer of the world order, and such. Obviously, the anti-Trumpers are not going to allow anybody to question the validity of the election of Mr. Joe Biden.
Reason 2: The election fraud denier-wanted a Democrat to be elected as the president.
Although any individual voter is free to vote for whomever he wants, when government officers let their personal political preferences override their official duty, then prerequisites for corruption are met. For instance, if judges or election officials refuse to seriously consider election fraud because of their affiliation with or support of the Democrat Party, then corruption has taken place. Not that the Democrat Party has a monopoly on this kind of wrongdoing, but it has gained notoriety as the party who cheats the most and the best.
Reason 3: The election fraud–denier was afraid of violence that investigation of election fraud may lead to.
Unfortunately, many of those in positions of power who could order serious and impartial investigations of the alleged election fraud and possible overturning of the results, if proven fraudulent or invalid, were concerned with a threat of violent riots of left’s militant organizations, like BLM and Antifa. Some could have been trying to save our country a civil war or something equally horrible, while others were afraid for their own safety. As much as I disagreed with their decision to support the cover-up of election fraud, their position had a dose of rationality.
Imagine that you are a judge or a justice, and you have a family to feed and protect. Wouldn’t you be concerned that your controversial judgment may irritate BLM or Antifa into bringing their “protests” to your neighborhood and trying to harm your spouse and your children or burn down your home? It seems likely that without violence by BLM and Antifa earlier this year, the well orchestrated election fraud would not have stood a chance to be left uninvestigated. If a thorough investigation proved that the results were invalid, Mr. Joe Biden would not stand a chance of being declared the winner.
The above realization implies that we are seeing a dawn of mobocracy in the U.S. as a replacement for our Constitutional Republic as a form of government. That spells out bad news for virtually everyone, including even the mobsters. We need brave leaders who will put the safety of law-abiding Americans in front of these leaders’ personal safety and political interest.
Reason 4: The election fraud–denier wants to be “pragmatic” — that is, to accept whatever happened and go along with whatever comes out of it.
By doing so, the election fraud–denier makes himself a perfect target for all kinds of predators, social parasites, and control freaks. He does not realize that losing a battle does not require capitulation of the war, and that losing a war does not require surrendering the nation to the hostile power that waged it. Some election fraud–deniers of this kind go even as far as to insist that if we cannot (or don’t want to) fight them (the election fraudsters and power-grabbers), then we may as well join them. That may be a nice little trick that may work, to some extent, in low-stage games, but not when submission of once free people to the power of the government that is not accountable to them is at stake. Such submission is almost always permanent, and the longer it lasts, the more difficult it is to abolish. Clearly, if the president is determined not by the will of the people, as prescribed in the Constitution, but by rigged elections under control of determined and ruthless cabal, then the president, and other elected officials, is accountable to the cabal and not to the voters.
Reason 5: The election-fraud denier was concerned that any serious investigation of election fraud might erode public trust in our elections.
Surely, many politicians who were not enthusiastic about how the elections 2020 were carried on, wanted to protect a”higher good,” a public trust that our elections are free, fair, and honest. As much as such may seem on its surface a noble concern, it is based on a fallacy. It presupposes that public trust in elections integrity is far more important that the actual integrity of the elections, which it is not. For why would We the People agree to be cheated of our right to elect the president of our choice just to maintain appearances that we were not cheated of that fundamental right? True, our Constitutional Republic has not been perfect, yet so many of us wholeheartedly support it. But among other strengths, it has an exceptional ability to self-repair. That is definitely not a feature of any rigged election system; once in place, it has a natural tendency to get worse and worse until it is overthrown by its victims — a costly and destructive option that is less than certain to deliver the desirable results.
Moreover, concerns that any serious investigation of election fraud might erode public trust in our elections are in many cases hypocritical, as they often come from the very groups and individuals who were not concerned with weakening of the presidency by endless investigations of false charges against him or who spread the mass anti-Trump propaganda that grossly undermined public trust in the Office of the President of the U.S.
Why would we, without serious and thorough investigation, accept categorical assurances by election fraud–deniers despite mounting evidence that organized election fraud took place in 2020 and was widespread, while President Trump’S categorical assurances that he did not collude with Russians were deemed not enough so that all the false allegations against him had to be seriously and thoroughly investigated?
There is no good reason for us to accept these assurances. The Constitutional laws and processes that make for this Republics have been weaponized to facilitate a grab of sweeping power by the transnational cabal that has long considered the U.S. as an obstacle in imposition of their rule over the world. Never mind that American $20+ trillion a year economy for grabs by the said control freaks would have been a sufficient reason in its own right. Now, it’s up to us, the American people, to resist the cabal and defend our freedom and the Constitution that stands for it.
As George Orwell wrote in 1984, “[w]e know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it.” So will our future rulers not relinquish the power they grabbed with 2020 election fraud, if we let them have their way.
••••
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-28--Five Questions Fauci & FDA Need to Answer on Pfizer & Moderna COVID Vaccines

5 Questions Fauci and FDA Need to Answer on Pfizer and Moderna COVID Vaccines Another day , another story about a healthcare worker suffering a “ severe allergic reaction ” after receiving Pfizer ’ s COVID vaccine — this time , in New York .
The report follows the news Children ’ s Health Defense ( CHD ) has been covering about similar severe reactions , first in the UK , then in Alaska and Illinois .
In light of these events , and because CHD previously warned the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) officials and Dr. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases ( NIAID ) , about the potential for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines to cause anaphylactic reactions , we have some questions we ’ d like Fauci and the FDA to answer .
In January 2019 , the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services , FDA , Center for Drug Evaluation and Research , and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research issued a document , “ Immunogenicity Testing of Therapeutic Protein Products — Developing and Validating Assays for Anti-Drug Antibody ( ADA ) Detection : Guidance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as providing “ recommendations to facilitate industry ’ s development and validation of essays for the assessment of the immunogenicity of therapeutic protein products during clinical trials , ” clearly acknowledges the existence of anti-drug antibodies , such as polyethylene glycol ( PEG ) , in humans .
The document states : • Immune responses to therapeutic protein products have the potential to affect product pharmacokinetics , pharmacodynamics , safety and efficacy .
• The clinical effects of immune responses in subjects are highly variable , ranging from no measurable effect to extremely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ADA formation is a helpful tool in understanding potential immune responses .
• Information on immune responses observed during clinical trials , particularly the incidence of ADA induction or any implications of ADA responses affecting pharmacokinetics , pharmacodynamics , safet , or efficacy is crucial for any therapeutic protein product development program .
• Accordingly , such information , if applicable , should be included in the prescribing information as a subsection of the ADVERSE REACTIONS section entitled Immunogenicity .
However , despite the FDA ’ s own guidance recommending that information about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inserts , no such information is included on either the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccine inserts .
Page six of the FDA document cites research that specifically addresses the need to “ adequately understand the risk of anti-drug antibodies … in products with modifications such as pegylation.
” But without that information provided on package inserts , vaccine recipients can ’ t understand those risks .
The rapidly developed and currently distributed mRNA vaccines rely on a new nanoparticle-based “ carrier system ” that utilizes PEG .
The lipid nanoparticles ( LNPs ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccines to facilitate the delivery of the mRNA into the cell is pegylated — which means , coated with PEG .
Coating the lipid nanoparticle with PEG keeps it from degrading .
An article published this year in Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews reported : It is mystifying how a never-before-utilized vaccine technology that contained a synthetic , nondegradable and increasingly controversial polymer ( PEG ) — known to be associated with adverse immune responses and the development of anti-drug antibodies — was allowed to bypass the bedrock of pharmaceutical development , which is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ article , FDA ’ s Marks told reporters the FDA was not certain what caused the reactions but that PEG “ could be the culprit.
” He added that the reaction some people have experienced “ could be more common than once thought.
” A simple search of the U.S. National Library of Medicine PubMed database for anti-PEG antibodies resulted in 32,061 results .
This information is readily available to anyone who has scientific curiosity about the use of this man-made polyether compound , derived from petroleum , which has many applications , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this year , retired Lt. Col. Harold Gielow , a CHD member who suffers with life- threatening anaphylaxis from exposure to products that contain PEG , notified us about his concerns related to the use of PEG in Moderna ’ s COVID vaccine .
After we reviewed the extensive scientific literature on the subject , CHD notified the federal agencies responsible for oversight for COVID-19 vaccine development and clinical trials .
Through our research , we discovered that scientists who once assumed the polymer was largely “ inert ” are now questioning its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ PEGylated particles to promote tumor growth and trigger adverse immune responses that include “ probably underdiagnosed ” life-threatening anaphylaxis .
Researchers reported that these undesirable responses have , on occasion , halted clinical trials .
As a result , some argue that it is time to develop alternatives to replace PEG .
American and Dutch researchers declared in 2013 : “ …accumulating evidence documenting the detrimental effects of PEG on drug delivery make it imperative that scientists in this field break their dependence on PEGylation.
” Another article , “ The Importance of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Overcoming PEG Immunogenicity in Drug Delivery and Bioconjugation , ” published in February 2020 , reported that treating patients who have acquired anti-PEG antibodies with PEGylated drugs results in accelerated blood clearance , low drug efficacy , hypersensitivity and , in some cases , life-threatening side effects .
The authors of that article also acknowledged that anti-PEG antibodies are also found in patients who have never been treated with PEGylated drugs , but have consumed products containing PEG .
This would explain why the woman in Alaska , who had no prior history @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for at least two nights after going into anaphylactic shock upon receiving the Pfizer vaccine .
On Sept. 25 , Robert F. Kennedy Jr. , CHD chairman and chief legal counsel , sent a letter to FDA Director Steven Hahn and Peter Marks , director of the Center for Biological Evaluation and Research , with a copy to Dr. Anthony Fauci , director of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases .
In that letter , we voiced concerns about the use of PEG in the Moderna COVID vaccine trials , due @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also because in recent years PEG has come under increasing scrutiny .
In the our letter to the FDA , CHD recommended that additional steps must be taken to reduce the risk of exposing trial participants to a substance to which up to 72 % of the U.S. population may have pre-existing antibodies .
• Pre-screening trial participants for the presence and titers of anti-PEG antibodies .
• Using such data to characterize the potential association and impact of anti-PEG antibodies on adverse reactions in the trial .
• Identifying the level of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the vaccine in the absence of secondary measures to address the anti-PEG immune response .
• Measuring the impact of the anti-PEG immune response on vaccine efficacy .
Despite the fact that the letter sent to FDA requested a timely review of our critical concerns — as time is of the essence in protecting those individuals with PEG antibodies from unnecessary exposure and harm — the FDA did not respond until December 2 , more than 2 months later .
CHD has yet to receive a response from NAIAD ’ s Fauci @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the development of its COVID-19 vaccine and has been in an oversight role for the clinical trials — that alone raises questions about conflicts of interest .
In the response CHD received from the FDA , we were instructed to reach out directly to the pharmaceutical company regarding our concerns about PEG .
But we wonder if the FDA even read out letter ?
Here ’ s why .
In July , Gielow reached out to the COVID Prevention Network with concerns about the use of PEG in Moderna ’ s vaccines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Analytical Chemistry which reported detectable and sometimes high levels of anti-PEG antibodies ( including first-line-of-defense IgM antibodies and later stage IgG antibodies ) in approximately 72 % of contemporary human samples and about 56 % of historical specimens from the 1970s through the 1990s .
Of the 72 % with PEG IgG antibodies , 8 % had anti-PEG IgG antibodies greater than 500ng/ml.
, which is considered extremely elevated .
The authors of that study concluded that “ …sensitive detection and precise quantitation of anti-PEG Ab levels in a clinical setting will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ PEGylated drugs in all target patient populations going forward.
” In his letter to the COVID Prevention Network , Gielow cited the study ’ s conclusions regarding the need for anti-PEG antibody testing and asked the following question : “ As Moderna ’ s mRNA-1273 candidate vaccine uses a PEGylated LNP vector , what procedures are included in the trial to mitigate this risk ?
” While the Moderna scientists allege that PEG antibody development is purely hypothetical , the scientific literature clearly documents that the immune system can and does form antibodies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ both animals and humans .
The existence of anti-PEG antibodies threatens patient safety through possible anaphylaxis reactions , and re-exposure to PEG-containing drugs may greatly increase the chance for adverse effects due to B cell memory of anti-PEG Abs .
In addition , Moderna ’ s documents and publications indicate that the company was well aware of safety risks associated with PEG and other aspects of its mRNA technology .
In the corporate prospectus supporting Moderna ’ s stock market launch in late 2018 , the company was frank that its technical approach @ @ @ @ @ @ @ acknowledged the potential for its proprietary lipid nanoparticles and PEG to produce “ systemic side effects , ” given the scientific literature ’ s documentation of these types of side effects for other LNPs .
In comments not generally seen by the public , Moderna stated ( p. 33 ) : Instead of expressing concern over clinical trial participants ’ welfare , the prospectus concluded that any one of these problems “ could materially harm [ the company ’ s ] business , financial conditions , and prospects.
” Such concerns stem from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recipients suffer a potentially severe allergic reaction , PEG-specific immune responses can actually reduce the efficacy of vaccines and increase the occurrence of adverse events .
The 2016 finding of 72 % of individuals with anti-PEG antibodies is highly concerning when the data is extrapolated to the U.S. population of 330 million who may receive this vaccine .
Based on the numbers in that study , about 237.6 million people may experience reduced effectiveness of the vaccine .
Of those,16.6 million who may have high antibody levels could be at risk for anaphylaxis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would see more severe allergic reactions to Pfizer ’ s PEG-containing vaccine than we ’ ve seen so far .
That raises the question : Did the vaccine maker alter the PEG molecule to reduce the risk of an allergic reaction ?
If so , what process did they use , and was that process reviewed and approved ?
Based on the growing number of news reports regarding the occurrences of allergic and anaphylactic reactions in individuals who have received the first dose of the vaccine , our concerns are justified .
These @ @ @ @ @ @ @ become even more common when the second round of vaccines are administered .
The fact that our federal agencies , responsible for assuring the public that the products they receive are safe and effective , have dropped the ball in their rush to develop COVID-19 vaccines is truly tragic .
An important opportunity was missed .
According to Zhang , “ screening and monitoring the anti-PEG abs in blood before and during the treatment with PEG-containing drugs are of particular importance to provide safety and maintain therapeutic efficacy .
The generation of anti-PEG @ @ @ @ @ @ @ therapeutics , thus reducing therapeutic efficacy .
Moreover , the existence of anti-PEG abs threatened patient safety with anaphylaxis and other reactions .
Re-exposure to PEG-containing drugs may greatly increase the chance for adverse effects due to B cell memory of anti-PEG abs.
” Due to the use of PEG in thousands of consumer products , including e-cigarettes and medications , it ’ s reasonable to assume that a growing number of people will develop anti-PEG antibodies .
If high-titer anti-PEG abs are present in blood , even people without known allergies may @ @ @ @ @ @ @ containing therapeutics for the first time , studies show .
We urge federal agencies that such screening be recommended prior to administration of any vaccines that use PEG in their manufacturing process .
Ideally , since anyone could unknowingly have anti-PEG antibodies , everyone should be screened before getting the Pfizer of Moderna vaccines .
But at the very least , we recommend that anyone who has had an undiagnosed allergic reaction consult with their physicians and request testing for anti-PEG antibodies before taking any COVID vaccine .
The Author : Lyn Redwood @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Nurse Practitioner who became involved in autism research and advocacy when her son was diagnosed with autism .
In 1999 she calculated the level of mercury exposure received from multiple thimerosal ( mercury ) containing vaccines and found her son was exposed to levels 125 times EPA Federal Safety guidelines and suffered with mercury toxicity .
Since that time , Ms. Redwood has testified before the Government Reform Committee on “ Mercury in medicine : Are we taking unnecessary risks ?
” and before a subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness , “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mercury in medicine and autism health in 2004 .
Ms. Redwood co-authored Autism : A novel form of mercury toxicity , a landmark paper linking the symptoms of autism with excessive exposure to mercury in 2000 and is published in Neurotoxicology , Medical Hypothesis , Molecular Psychiatry , Mothering Magazine and Autism-Aspergers Digest .
She has appeared on “ Good Morning America ” with Diane Sawyer , the Montel Williams Show and numerous national news outlets .
Ms. Redwood has been interviewed by U.S. News and World Report , Wired Magazine , People @ @ @ @ @ @ @ winning book by David Kirby “ Evidence of Harm.
” Ms. Redwood is co-founder of the Coalition for SafeMinds and the National Autism Association .
• She served as a public member of the National Institute of Health , Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee from 2007-2014 and was an Integration Panel Member for the Department of Defense , Autism Spectrum Disorder Research Program from 2007-2009 .
• She was awarded “ Person of the year ” in 2010 by Spectrum Magazine and was the recipient of the National Autism Association “ Believe Award ” @ @ @

5 Questions Fauci and FDA Need to Answer on Pfizer and Moderna COVID Vaccines
As reports surfaced today of yet another healthcare worker who suffered a severe allergic reaction to Pfizer’s COVID vaccine, it’s time the FDA and Fauci explain what they plan to do about it.
By: Lyn Redwood, RN, MSN
Another day, another story about a healthcare worker suffering a “severe allergic reaction” after receiving Pfizer’s COVID vaccine — this time, in New York. The report follows the news Children’s Health Defense (CHD) has been covering about similar severe reactions, first in the UK, then in Alaska and Illinois.
In light of these events, and because CHD previously warned the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials and Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), about the potential for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines to cause anaphylactic reactions, we have some questions we’d like Fauci and the FDA to answer.
They are:
1. Why didn’t the FDA’s Center for Biological Evaluation and Research require Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech to conduct immunogenicity testing on their COVID-19 vaccines for anti-drug antibodies as recommended in the agencies’ own guidelines for drug development during clinical trials?
In January 2019, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, FDA, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research issued a document, “Immunogenicity Testing of Therapeutic Protein Products — Developing and Validating Assays for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Detection: Guidance for Industry.”
The document, described as providing “recommendations to facilitate industry’s development and validation of essays for the assessment of the immunogenicity of therapeutic protein products during clinical trials,” clearly acknowledges the existence of anti-drug antibodies, such as polyethylene glycol (PEG), in humans. The document states:
Immune responses to therapeutic protein products have the potential to affect product pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and efficacy.
The clinical effects of immune responses in subjects are highly variable, ranging from no measurable effect to extremely harmful.
Detection and analysis of ADA formation is a helpful tool in understanding potential immune responses.
Information on immune responses observed during clinical trials, particularly the incidence of ADA induction or any implications of ADA responses affecting pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safet, or efficacy is crucial for any therapeutic protein product development program.
Accordingly, such information, if applicable, should be included in the prescribing information as a subsection of the ADVERSE REACTIONS section entitled Immunogenicity.
However, despite the FDA’s own guidance recommending that information about immunogenicity be included on the vaccine package inserts, no such information is included on either the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccine inserts.
Page six of the FDA document cites research that specifically addresses the need to “adequately understand the risk of anti-drug antibodies … in products with modifications such as pegylation.” But without that information provided on package inserts, vaccine recipients can’t understand those risks.
The rapidly developed and currently distributed mRNA vaccines rely on a new nanoparticle-based “carrier system” that utilizes PEG. The lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) carrier system used in the two COVID-19 vaccines to facilitate the delivery of the mRNA into the cell is pegylated — which means, coated with PEG. Coating the lipid nanoparticle with PEG keeps it from degrading.
An article published this year in Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews reported:
“Conjugation of polyethylene glycols (PEGs) to proteins or drug delivery nanosystems is a widely accepted method to increase the therapeutic index of complex nano-biopharmaceuticals. Nevertheless, these drugs and agents are often immunogenic, triggering the rise of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). Among these ADAs, anti-PEG IgG and IgM were shown to account for efficacy loss due to accelerated blood clearance of the drug (ABC phenomenon) and hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) entailing severe allergic symptoms with occasionally fatal anaphylaxis.”
It is mystifying how a never-before-utilized vaccine technology that contained a synthetic, nondegradable and increasingly controversial polymer (PEG) — known to be associated with adverse immune responses and the development of anti-drug antibodies — was allowed to bypass the bedrock of pharmaceutical development, which is immunological testing.
2. Why does the FDA seem surprised by the recent reports of life-threatening anaphylactic reactions after the agency approved emergency use of two mRNA COVID-19 vaccines that contain polyethylene glycol?
In a recent news article, FDA’s Marks told reporters the FDA was not certain what caused the reactions but that PEG “could be the culprit.” He added that the reaction some people have experienced “could be more common than once thought.”
A simple search of the U.S. National Library of Medicine PubMed database for anti-PEG antibodies resulted in 32,061 results. This information is readily available to anyone who has scientific curiosity about the use of this man-made polyether compound, derived from petroleum, which has many applications, from industrial manufacturing to medicine.
Earlier this year, retired Lt. Col. Harold Gielow, a CHD member who suffers with life- threatening anaphylaxis from exposure to products that contain PEG, notified us about his concerns related to the use of PEG in Moderna’s COVID vaccine.
After we reviewed the extensive scientific literature on the subject, CHD notified the federal agencies responsible for oversight for COVID-19 vaccine development and clinical trials.
Through our research, we discovered that scientists who once assumed the polymer was largely “inert” are now questioning its biocompatibility and warning about the potential of PEGylated particles to promote tumor growth and trigger adverse immune responses that include “probably underdiagnosed” life-threatening anaphylaxis. Researchers reported that these undesirable responses have, on occasion, halted clinical trials. As a result, some argue that it is time to develop alternatives to replace PEG.
American and Dutch researchers declared in 2013: “…accumulating evidence documenting the detrimental effects of PEG on drug delivery make it imperative that scientists in this field break their dependence on PEGylation.”
Another article, “The Importance of Poly(ethylene glycol) Alternatives for Overcoming PEG Immunogenicity in Drug Delivery and Bioconjugation,” published in February 2020, reported that treating patients who have acquired anti-PEG antibodies with PEGylated drugs results in accelerated blood clearance, low drug efficacy, hypersensitivity and, in some cases, life-threatening side effects.
The authors of that article also acknowledged that anti-PEG antibodies are also found in patients who have never been treated with PEGylated drugs, but have consumed products containing PEG. This would explain why the woman in Alaska, who had no prior history of allergies, had to be hospitalized for at least two nights after going into anaphylactic shock upon receiving the Pfizer vaccine.
On Sept. 25, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., CHD chairman and chief legal counsel, sent a letter to FDA Director Steven Hahn and Peter Marks, director of the Center for Biological Evaluation and Research, with a copy to Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases. In that letter, we voiced concerns about the use of PEG in the Moderna COVID vaccine trials, due to the development of anti-PEG antibodies and also because in recent years PEG has come under increasing scrutiny.
In the our letter to the FDA, CHD recommended that additional steps must be taken to reduce the risk of exposing trial participants to a substance to which up to 72% of the U.S. population may have pre-existing antibodies.
The recommended steps included:
Pre-screening trial participants for the presence and titers of anti-PEG antibodies.
Using such data to characterize the potential association and impact of anti-PEG antibodies on adverse reactions in the trial.
Identifying the level of anti-PEG antibody titers that precludes safe administration of the vaccine in the absence of secondary measures to address the anti-PEG immune response.
Measuring the impact of the anti-PEG immune response on vaccine efficacy.
3. Why did FDA officials not acknowledge the valid and scientifically supported concerns regarding the use of PEG in COVID-19 vaccines when CHD first notified them in September?
Despite the fact that the letter sent to FDA requested a timely review of our critical concerns — as time is of the essence in protecting those individuals with PEG antibodies from unnecessary exposure and harm — the FDA did not respond until December 2, more than 2 months later.
CHD has yet to receive a response from NAIAD’s Fauci. NIAID is a partner with Moderna on the development of its COVID-19 vaccine and has been in an oversight role for the clinical trials — that alone raises questions about conflicts of interest.
4. Why did the FDA abandon its regulatory authority to the pharmaceutical companies developing COVID-19 vaccines?
In the response CHD received from the FDA, we were instructed to reach out directly to the pharmaceutical company regarding our concerns about PEG. But we wonder if the FDA even read out letter? Here’s why.
In July, Gielow reached out to the COVID Prevention Network with concerns about the use of PEG in Moderna’s vaccines. He cited a 2016 study in Analytical Chemistry which reported detectable and sometimes high levels of anti-PEG antibodies (including first-line-of-defense IgM antibodies and later stage IgG antibodies) in approximately 72% of contemporary human samples and about 56% of historical specimens from the 1970s through the 1990s. Of the 72% with PEG IgG antibodies, 8% had anti-PEG IgG antibodies greater than 500ng/ml., which is considered extremely elevated.
The authors of that study concluded that “…sensitive detection and precise quantitation of anti-PEG Ab levels in a clinical setting will be essential to ensuring the safe use of PEGylated drugs in all target patient populations going forward.”
In his letter to the COVID Prevention Network, Gielow cited the study’s conclusions regarding the need for anti-PEG antibody testing and asked the following question: “As Moderna’s mRNA-1273 candidate vaccine uses a PEGylated LNP vector, what procedures are included in the trial to mitigate this risk?”
Here’s how the network responded:
“Thank you so much for this scientific question. I consulted with several of the physician scientists working on the Moderna study, and they have provided me with this response to send on to you: “Pre-existing antibody levels, along with various genetic polymorphisms, may impact the safety profile of a biomedical intervention in a variety of populations. If there are significant safety signals from the CoVPN clinical trials, all efforts will be made to understand the mechanisms that may have contributed to these signals. Pre-screening populations based on hypothesized biomarkers, such as anti-PEG antibodies, is not a strategy currently employed in our clinical trials.”
While the Moderna scientists allege that PEG antibody development is purely hypothetical, the scientific literature clearly documents that the immune system can and does form antibodies against PEG (anti-PEG Abs) in both animals and humans. The existence of anti-PEG antibodies threatens patient safety through possible anaphylaxis reactions, and re-exposure to PEG-containing drugs may greatly increase the chance for adverse effects due to B cell memory of anti-PEG Abs.
In addition, Moderna’s documents and publications indicate that the company was well aware of safety risks associated with PEG and other aspects of its mRNA technology. In the corporate prospectus supporting Moderna’s stock market launch in late 2018, the company was frank that its technical approach has numerous risks.
Specifically, Moderna acknowledged the potential for its proprietary lipid nanoparticles and PEG to produce “systemic side effects,” given the scientific literature’s documentation of these types of side effects for other LNPs. In comments not generally seen by the public, Moderna stated (p. 33):
“[T]here can be no assurance that our LNPs will not have undesired effects. Our LNPs could contribute, in whole or in part, to one or more of the following: immune reactions, infusion reactions, complement reactions, opsonation reactions, [links added] antibody reactions . . . or reactions to the PEG from some lipids or PEG otherwise associated with the LNP. Certain aspects of our investigational medicines may induce immune reactions from either the mRNA or the lipid as well as adverse reactions within liver pathways or degradation of the mRNA or the LNP, any of which could lead to significant adverse events in one or more of our clinical trials.”
Instead of expressing concern over clinical trial participants’ welfare, the prospectus concluded that any one of these problems “could materially harm [the company’s] business, financial conditions, and prospects.”
Such concerns stem from that fact that not only can vaccine recipients suffer a potentially severe allergic reaction, PEG-specific immune responses can actually reduce the efficacy of vaccines and increase the occurrence of adverse events.
The 2016 finding of 72% of individuals with anti-PEG antibodies is highly concerning when the data is extrapolated to the U.S. population of 330 million who may receive this vaccine.
Based on the numbers in that study, about 237.6 million people may experience reduced effectiveness of the vaccine. Of those,16.6 million who may have high antibody levels could be at risk for anaphylaxis. According to those numbers, we would see more severe allergic reactions to Pfizer’s PEG-containing vaccine than we’ve seen so far. That raises the question: Did the vaccine maker alter the PEG molecule to reduce the risk of an allergic reaction? If so, what process did they use, and was that process reviewed and approved?
Based on the growing number of news reports regarding the occurrences of allergic and anaphylactic reactions in individuals who have received the first dose of the vaccine, our concerns are justified. These serious and life-threatening reactions will continue and become even more common when the second round of vaccines are administered.
5. Will FDA and NIAID now require mRNA vaccine manufacturers to conduct assessments of the immunogenicity of the pegylated lipid nanoparticles used in their COVID-19 vaccines, and will they also consider pre-screening of all mRNA vaccine recipients for the presence and titers of anti-PEG antibodies?
The fact that our federal agencies, responsible for assuring the public that the products they receive are safe and effective, have dropped the ball in their rush to develop COVID-19 vaccines is truly tragic. An important opportunity was missed.
According to Zhang, “screening and monitoring the anti-PEG abs in blood before and during the treatment with PEG-containing drugs are of particular importance to provide safety and maintain therapeutic efficacy. The generation of anti-PEG abs can accelerate the clearance of PEGylated therapeutics, thus reducing therapeutic efficacy. Moreover, the existence of anti-PEG abs threatened patient safety with anaphylaxis and other reactions. Re-exposure to PEG-containing drugs may greatly increase the chance for adverse effects due to B cell memory of anti-PEG abs.”
Due to the use of PEG in thousands of consumer products, including e-cigarettes and medications, it’s reasonable to assume that a growing number of people will develop anti-PEG antibodies.
If high-titer anti-PEG abs are present in blood, even people without known allergies may have severe hypersensitive reactions when receiving PEG containing therapeutics for the first time, studies show.
We urge federal agencies that such screening be recommended prior to administration of any vaccines that use PEG in their manufacturing process. Ideally, since anyone could unknowingly have anti-PEG antibodies, everyone should be screened before getting the Pfizer of Moderna vaccines. But at the very least, we recommend that anyone who has had an undiagnosed allergic reaction consult with their physicians and request testing for anti-PEG antibodies before taking any COVID vaccine.
••••
The Author: Lyn Redwood, R.N., M.S.N., is a Nurse Practitioner who became involved in autism research and advocacy when her son was diagnosed with autism. In 1999 she calculated the level of mercury exposure received from multiple thimerosal (mercury) containing vaccines and found her son was exposed to levels 125 times EPA Federal Safety guidelines and suffered with mercury toxicity. Since that time, Ms. Redwood has testified before the Government Reform Committee on “Mercury in medicine: Are we taking unnecessary risks?” and before a subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness, “Truth revealed: New scientific discoveries regarding mercury in medicine and autism health in 2004. Ms. Redwood co-authored Autism: A novel form of mercury toxicity, a landmark paper linking the symptoms of autism with excessive exposure to mercury in 2000 and is published in Neurotoxicology, Medical Hypothesis, Molecular Psychiatry, Mothering Magazine and Autism-Aspergers Digest. She has appeared on “Good Morning America” with Diane Sawyer, the Montel Williams Show and numerous national news outlets. Ms. Redwood has been interviewed by U.S. News and World Report, Wired Magazine, People and is prominently featured in the award winning book by David Kirby “Evidence of Harm.” Ms. Redwood is co-founder of the Coalition for SafeMinds and the National Autism Association. • She served as a public member of the National Institute of Health, Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee from 2007-2014 and was an Integration Panel Member for the Department of Defense, Autism Spectrum Disorder Research Program from 2007-2009. • She was awarded “Person of the year” in 2010 by Spectrum Magazine and was the recipient of the National Autism Association “Believe Award” in 2013.
••••
••••
TLB Editors Note: TLB highly recommends you click on the image (the Defender) below, visit this great website, and do whatever you can to help see this vital forum succeed … for the sake of our children !!! Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.