thelibertybeacon--2020-08-12--Indictments Likely by Sep. 4th Against Former Obama Administration Officials

Indictments Likely by Sep. 4th Against Former Obama Administration Officials Here is why federal criminal indictments of former Obama Administration officials are likely before September 4th : Here will be the currently existing public record of the relevant facts regarding how high up this operation actually went : At the top level , Obama , Biden , and Rice , were the core team , and Obama was himself the leader ; but Obama — as is usual in such instances — left nothing in writing to implicate himself : unrecorded private conversations would have been all .
And Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with subordinates in order to have any chance to nail any of those three : the mastermind ( Obama ) , and his two top aides in the scheme .
To investigate the president , it was a practical necessity to sideline his chosen national-security adviser .
Michael Flynn was not the objective .
He was the obstacle .
Once you grasp that fundamental fact , it becomes easier to understand the latest disclosures the Justice Department made in the Flynn case on Thursday .
They are the most important revelations to date @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , code-named Crossfire Hurricane .
The new disclosures , in conjunction with all we have learned in the last week , answer the all-important why question : Why was Flynn set up ?
… The FBI set a perjury trap for Flynn , hoping to lure him into misstatements that the bureau could portray as lies .
In the frenzied political climate of the time , that would have been enough to get him removed from his new position as national security adviser ( NSA ) , perhaps even to prosecute him .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , startling as they are to read , just elucidate what was already obvious .
But why did they do it ?
That has been the baffling question .
… The objective of the Obama administration and its FBI hierarchy was to continue the Trump–Russia investigation , even after President Trump took office , and even though President Trump was the quarry .
The investigation … would allow the FBI to keep digging until it finally came up with a crime or impeachable offense that they were then confident they would find .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ was telling the FISA court that Trump ’ s campaign was suspected of collaborating in Russia ’ s election interference .
FBI brass had also pushed for the intelligence community to include the Steele dossier — the bogus compendium of Trump–Russia collusion allegations — in its report assessing Russia ’ s meddling in the campaign .
But how could the FBI sustain an investigation targeting the president when the president would have the power to shut the investigation down ?
The only way the bureau could pull that off would be to conceal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Russia investigation — in particular , the fact that Trump was the target .
That is why Flynn had to go .
… There is a war-to-the-death among crocodiles at the top , the political executors for ( actually employees of ) America ’ s aristocracy — both the Democratic Party ’ s billionaires and the Republican Party ’ s billionaires — in order to determine which of these two groups of billionaires will control the U.S. Government .
For example , when two kings fight to conquer each other , it ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ killing and dying , and the pawns below them just fall : they die or else become crippled trying to destroy the other king ’ s troops and population .
Right now , it ’ s between the Trump forces versus the Obama forces , but the same aristocracy controls them both .
These crocodiles have billionaires backing them , and therefore are protected at beck-and-call by vast teams of lawyers , propagandists , and other paid agents , to protect them .
They ’ re well-protected .
In other words : if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ then he will be heavily in debt to the world ’ s biggest weapons-maker , a corporation whose profits are totally dependent upon selling to the U.S. Government and to its allied governments such as Saudi Arabia , UAE , and Israel .
For unstated reasons , Republican billionaires have thus far targeted only Comey , not Clapper or Brennan — only the FBI .
If Barr will likewise protect Clapper and Brennan , his “ investigation ” will fail .
The billionaires want to have a monopoly on conspiracies , and therefore @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conspiracies exist , but there is no credible way that an individual atop an organization can run a crime except by secretly instructing his subordinates , who secretly instruct their subordinates , and on down .
And most conspiracies are not at all criminal , but are instead private corporations ’ private business plans ; so , there ’ s nothing unusual about conspiracies .
Keeping the public thinking that conspiracies either don ’ t exist , or exist amongst unorganized masses of people instead of headed by a “ mastermind , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , are just ways of deceiving the public in order to keep the public under control by keeping them ignorant and confused — it ’ s part of the worst type of conspiracy that exists , which is conspiracies against the public .
Unfortunately , conspiracies like that exist always .
Johnson ( who writes badly ) failed to identify his source on that “ summer of 2015 , ” much less the precise date and incident .
He routinely quotes sources without citing them .
However , if what Johnson said there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was authorized to do that must be determined .
Was it Obama ?
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

Indictments Likely by Sep. 4th Against Former Obama Administration Officials
ERIC ZUESSE
Here is why federal criminal indictments of former Obama Administration officials are likely before September 4th:
went — possibly up to Barack Obama and Joe Biden, but that’s the big question. As I have previously documented, the case is overwhelming that extremely serious crimes were, in fact, committed and covered-up, and the only real question now is how high up in the Administration theywent — possibly up to Barack Obama and Joe Biden, but that’s the big question.
.
(I need to state here, for the record, that I voted for Barack Obama both times, though recognized in 2012 that he was the lesser of two evils — I am not, and never have been, a Republican.)
.
The George W. Bush Administration established the precedent that there is a “60-day rule” that any indictment of a person who is associated with a U.S. Presidential election that is to occur within the following 60 days is to be avoided. the current U.S. Attorney General, Bill Barr, has reiterated it. Consequently, if there will be any indictments, then Barr would need to be an idiot to bring them after that time. It’s not a law, but it is — and ever since Bush’s Presidency has been — the custom; andConsequently, if there will be any indictments, then Barr would need to be an idiot to bring them after that time.
.
Any reader here who wants to know, in a general sense, what the crimes were, can find that at my previous presentation
.
the public should view the indictments only as being political retribution for Democrats having impeached and tried to remove Trump. (See There is considerable speculation in Republican circles regarding how high up those crimes went. (See this and this .) For over a year now , there has also been considerable propaganda from participants in the cover-ups — mainly Democrats — aimed at preparing the public for such indictments (if they happen) by prejudicing the public to believe that (even if the 60-day rule will be adhered to)(See this , for a recent example of that Democratic Party propaganda.)
.
Here will be the currently existing public record of the relevant facts regarding how high up this operation actually went:
.
National Review magazine, 5 and 6 January 2017, right before Trump became President: On 15 February 2018, Andrew C. McCarthy headlined at the Republican Party’smagazine, “What Did Comey Tell President Trump about the Steele Dossier?” and he wrote about what had happened on, right before Trump became President:
.
January 5 was the day President Obama was presented with the ballyhooed report he had ordered to be rushed to completion by multiple intelligence agencies before his administration ended, [This report, from the Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, was to serve as the basis for impeaching Trump and removing Trump from the Presidency, thus making the more reliably neoconservative V.P., Mike Pence, the U.S. President, which many billionaires wanted. All of America’s 700 or so billionaires are neoconservatives, in both Parties, no exceptions — none has more than token-donated to any anti-neoconservative national candidate. Pence is regarded as more-reliably neoconservative than Trump is.] The briefing that day was conducted by four intelligence-community leaders: James Comey, Michael Rogers, John Brennan, and James Clapper, directors respectively of the FBI, NSA, CIA and the Office of the National Intelligence Director. “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections.” [This report, from the Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, was to serve as the basis for impeaching Trump and removing Trump fromthe Presidency, thus making the more reliably neoconservative V.P.,, the U.S. President, which many billionaires wanted. All of America’s 700 or so billionaires are neoconservatives, in both Parties, no exceptions — none has more than token-donated to any anti-neoconservative national candidate. Pence is regarded as more-reliably neoconservative than Trump is.] Just as significant: January 5 was the day before these same intelligence-community leaders would brief President-elect Trump on the same report. [McCarthy had earlier said that “January 5 was the day President Obama was presented with” this report, so he contradicts himself there. January 5 not “the day before.”] [McCarthy had earlier said that “January 5 was the day President Obama was presented with” this report, so he contradicts himself there. January 5 actually was the day of, and“the day before.”] Also on hand at the January 5 White House briefing were Vice President Joe Biden and acting Attorney General Sally Yates. According to Rice, immediately after the briefing, President Obama had his two top law-enforcement officials, Yates and Comey, linger for “a brief follow-on conversation” with the administration’s political leadership: Obama, Biden, and Rice.
.
At the top level, Obama, Biden, and Rice, were the core team, and Obama was himself the leader; but Obama — as is usual in such instances — left nothing in writing to implicate himself: unrecorded private conversations would have been all. And Trump’s team will need to plea-bargain with subordinates in order to have any chance to nail any of those three: the mastermind (Obama), and his two top aides in the scheme.
.
without disclosing its source. He referred to the political document simply as ‘the derogatory files’. … Comey also withheld the facts that the dossier was financed by the Hillary Clinton campaign. … The omissions led Trump to believe the contents of the dossier came from U.S. intelligence.” (NOTE: Trump, who pretends to be intelligent, skeptical, analytical, and knowledgeable, is anything but those; so, he foolishly trusted Obama’s team, and didn’t ask the probing questions he should have asked of Comey.) As the Republican Paul Sperry, an investigative journalist for Real Clear Politics, noted on 22 July 2019, under the headline “Justice Dept. Watchdog Has Evidence Comey Probed Trump, on the Sly” , “Following a report on alleged Russian election interference, Comey cleared the conference room to privately brief Trump on the Clinton campaign-funded Steele dossier itself —He referred to the political document simply as ‘the derogatory files’. … Comey… The omissions led Trump to believe the contents of the dossier came from U.S. intelligence.” (NOTE: Trump, who pretends to be intelligent, skeptical, analytical, and knowledgeable, is anything but those; so, he foolishly trusted Obama’s team, and didn’t ask the probing questions he should have asked of Comey.)
.
Wall Street Journal on 25 July 2019, The most notable aspect of the Mueller report was always what it omitted: the origins of this mess. … Nine times during Wednesday’s hearing, Robert Mueller answered that something was not in his ‘purview’ to investigate. And each time, it was ‘in response to questions about the origin story of the FBI counterintelligence operation against the Trump campaign,’ The Wall Street Journal editorial board writes. ‘Americans need to know how and why a U.S. intelligence and law-enforcement agency came to spy on a presidential campaign.’” Columnist Kimberly Strassel headlined in the Republican Party’son 25 July 2019, “What Mueller Was Trying to Hide” , and excerpts from it were published by the White House , including: “… Nine times during Wednesday’s hearing, Robert Mueller answered that something was not in his ‘purview’ to investigate. And each time, it was ‘in response to questions about the origin story of the FBI counterintelligence operation against the Trump campaign,’ Theeditorial board writes. ‘Americans need to know how and why a U.S. intelligence and law-enforcement agency came to spy on a presidential campaign.’”
.
To investigate the president, it was a practical necessity to sideline his chosen national-security adviser. Michael Flynn was not the objective. He was the obstacle. Once you grasp that fundamental fact, it becomes easier to understand the latest disclosures the Justice Department made in the Flynn case on Thursday. They are the most important revelations to date about the FBI’s Trump–Russia investigation, code-named Crossfire Hurricane. The new disclosures, in conjunction with all we have learned in the last week, answer the all-important why question: Why was Flynn set up? … The FBI set a perjury trap for Flynn, hoping to lure him into misstatements that the bureau could portray as lies. In the frenzied political climate of the time, that would have been enough to get him removed from his new position as national security adviser (NSA), perhaps even to prosecute him. On that score, the new disclosures, startling as they are to read, just elucidate what was already obvious. But why did they do it? That has been the baffling question. … The objective of the Obama administration and its FBI hierarchy was to continue the Trump–Russia investigation, even after President Trump took office, and even though President Trump was the quarry. The investigation … would allow the FBI to keep digging until it finally came up with a crime or impeachable offense that they were then confident they would find. Remember, even then, the bureau was telling the FISA court that Trump’s campaign was suspected of collaborating in Russia’s election interference. FBI brass had also pushed for the intelligence community to include the Steele dossier — the bogus compendium of Trump–Russia collusion allegations — in its report assessing Russia’s meddling in the campaign. But how could the FBI sustain an investigation targeting the president when the president would have the power to shut the investigation down? The only way the bureau could pull that off would be to conceal from the president the fullness of the Russia investigation — in particular, the fact that Trump was the target. That is why Flynn had to go. …
.
Daily Mail bannered Biden actually proposed that the (archaic and unused) Logan Act be used as the legal basis to do so — which was the basis that the FBI did subsequently cite (this being the first-ever usage of that 1799 law). So, both the idea of getting rid of Flynn, and the legal means to do it, were supplied by Biden, and Comey followed through to get rid of Flynn. In other words: it was Biden’s staff that had researched to find a legal way to do this. “That became an admitted pretext to investigate General Flynn.” Biden was a principal in this operation; he was a founder of the FBI’s operation “Crossfire Hurricane.” On 24 June 2020, Britain’sbannered “Unsealed documents suggest Joe Biden ‘personally raised the idea’ of investigating Michael Flynn over his ties to Russia” and reported that not only did the available written evidence indicate that Biden had been the first person to propose this to FBI Director Comey on 4 January 2017, but that— which was the basis that the FBI did subsequently cite (this being the first-ever usage of that 1799 law). So,, and Comey followed through to get rid of Flynn. In other words: it was Biden’s staff that had researched to find a legal way to do this. “That became an admitted pretext to investigate General Flynn.”
.
There is a war-to-the-death among crocodiles at the top, the political executors for (actually employees of) America’s aristocracy — both the Democratic Party’s billionaires and the Republican Party’s billionaires — in order to determine which of these two groups of billionaires will control the U.S. Government. For example, when two kings fight to conquer each other, it’s their subordinates who head the actual killing and dying, and the pawns below them just fall: they die or else become crippled trying to destroy the other king’s troops and population. Right now, it’s between the Trump forces versus the Obama forces, but the same aristocracy controls them both.
.
These crocodiles have billionaires backing them, and therefore are protected at beck-and-call by vast teams of lawyers, propagandists, and other paid agents, to protect them. They’re well-protected.
.
James Clapper is now an employee of the Northrup Grumman and other funders of the American Military-Industrial Complex, all of them neoconservative (i.e., pro-imperialism) foundations and war-related corporations, such as the Smith-Richardson Foundation, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Open Society Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund, James Murdoch, and Raytheon. CNAS was co-founded by is now an employee of the Center for a New American Security , which is funded byand other funders of the American Military-Industrial Complex, all of them neoconservative (i.e., pro-imperialism) foundations and war-related corporations, such as the. CNAS was co-founded by Michèle Flournoy , who would likely have become a President Hillary Clinton’s Secretary of State or Secretary of Defense . Flournoy is now an employee of Harvard’s rabidly pro-invasion Belfer Center. All of these people represent the same thing: America’s billionaires — no one else.
.
John Brennan in retirement “serves as a Distinguished Fellow at the Center on National Security at Fordham Law School, a Distinguished Scholar at the University of Texas at Austin, a Senior Advisor at Kissinger Associates Inc, and a consultant to a variety of [unnamed] private sector companies.”
.
.
In other words: if Biden does become the U.S. President, then he will be heavily in debt to the world’s biggest weapons-maker, a corporation whose profits are totally dependent upon selling to the U.S. Government and to its allied governments such as Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Israel.
.
.
For unstated reasons, Republican billionaires have thus far targeted only Comey, not Clapper or Brennan — only the FBI. If Barr will likewise protect Clapper and Brennan, his “investigation” will fail.
.
The billionaires want to have a monopoly on conspiracies, and therefore they pretend that only kooks think that conspiracies exist, but there is no credible way that an individual atop an organization can run a crime except by secretly instructing his subordinates, who secretly instruct their subordinates, and on down. And most conspiracies are not at all criminal, but are instead private corporations’ private business plans; so, there’s nothing unusual about conspiracies. Keeping the public thinking that conspiracies either don’t exist, or exist amongst unorganized masses of people instead of headed by a “mastermind,” or else that they all are illegal, are just ways of deceiving the public in order to keep the public under control by keeping them ignorant and confused — it’s part of the worst type of conspiracy that exists, which is conspiracies against the public. Unfortunately, conspiracies like that exist always.
.
There inevitably are pressures upon all investigators for each side, deterring them from publicly disclosing, or helping to disclose, anything that would endanger any of the actual principals, who are billionaires. The principals in this specific operation (which the FBI called “Crossfire Hurricane” but was actually initiated in the CIA by no later than August 2016) will go down before any of his financial sponsors will. So, the question now is: how high is this investigation actually reaching? The principals in this specific operation (which the FBI called “Crossfire Hurricane” but was actually initiated in the CIA by no later than August 2016 , if not by the DNI Clapper, if not by the President himself — and certainly Obama was aware of it byAugust 2016) will go down before any of his financial sponsors will. So, the question now is: how high is this investigation actually reaching?
.
The CIA, with the knowledge of the Director of National Intelligence [James Clapper], worked with British counterparts [in MI6] starting in the summer of 2015 to collect intelligence on Republican and at least one Democrat candidate. [CIA Director] John Brennan was probably hoping that his proactive steps to help the Hillary Clinton campaign would ensure him taking over as DNI in the new Clinton Administration. Regardless of motives, the CIA enlisted the British intelligence community to start gathering intelligence on most major Republican candidates and on Bernie Sanders.
.
Johnson (who writes badly) failed to identify his source on that “summer of 2015,” much less the precise date and incident. He routinely quotes sources without citing them. However, if what Johnson said there is true, then certainly whether Brennan was authorized to do that must be determined. Was it Obama?
,
whether or not he had the President’s authorization to be spying domestically against Republican candidates and against Bernie Sanders. Furthermore, the CIA’s usage of MI6 to carry out the CIA’s spying against American citizens that the CIA is targeting in the U.S., should be outlawed, because it’s yet further proof that America is a police-state. (MI6 does the same: uses the CIA to spy against UK citizens in UK. Barr’s team would have to be incompetent not to be taking a deposition, under oath, from Brennan, as toagainst Republican candidates and against Bernie Sanders. Furthermore, the CIA’s usage of MI6 to carry out the CIA’s spying against American citizens that the CIA is targeting in the U.S., should be outlawed, because it’s yet further proof that America is a police-state. (MI6 does the same: uses the CIA to spy against UK citizens in UK. Both countries are police-states.
.
************
.
.
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-08-12--Putin and Russia Are Facing a Very Serious Crisis in Belarus

Now the events in Belarus force me to address this very unpleasant topic : Belarus is facing a complex and dangerous situation which might well result in a major crisis inside Belarus and even a loss of sovereignty .
But first , before we look into what just happened , let me begin with a quick “ mini-primer ” about Belarus .
Here is what I think everybody ought to know about this country : • Belarus is a completely artificial creation , even more artificial than the Ukraine .
At least in the Ukraine there were “ westerners ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Russians at all ( you can think of them as the “ real Ukrainians ” if you want ) and whose hatred for everything Russian was every bit as rabid as the one of the Interahamwe of Rwanda .
There is no meaningful equivalent to the Banderites in Belarus .
• Lukashenko was no more pro-Russian than Ianukovich ( Ukraine ) .
This is crucial .
Lukashenko was always pro-Lukashenko , not pro-Russia .
Both the West and Lukashenko like to say that Belarus is the only real Russian ally .
This is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are supranational union states .
However , it is true that Lukashenko tried to use the historical identity between the Russian and Belarusian people to demand that Russia help him out over and over and over again .
And until recently , Russia did .
• As a country , Belarus is a quasi perfect police state with an extremely competent and feared KGB ( yes , in Belarus they kept the name ) which controls everything and everybody .
This is also crucial for reasons I will explain below .
• As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to foster a reunification with Belarus but this process was never fully completed due to regular problems , and even crises , between Moscow and Minsk .
Russia poured in immense sums of money to keep the Belarusian society from crashing .
• Finally , Belarus is really a poor country with very limited resources .
For Russia , however , Belarus is a crucial military ally , one which plays a central role in Russian defense plans .
If the US and NATO were successful in taking control of the country , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the Russian security .
These are just a few pointers to compare and contrast Belarus with the Ukraine .
Now let me summarize what just happened .
The Belarusian authorities have declared that “ hundreds ” of men ( supposedly Russians ) have been sent to Belarus with nefarious intentions .
Lukashenko has since officially confirmed that he got this info from the Ukrainian SBU .
The men themselves were described as terrorists , insurgents , members of the “ Wagner ” PMC , subversives , etc .
and their goals were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ new “ maidan ” in Belarus , create chaos , etc .
Frankly , the Belarusian authorities never got their story straight and , frankly again , this really makes no difference at all .
Here are two things which I consider as indisputable : • Russia would never even consider using force or illegal covert operations against Lukashenko and/or Belarus • The Belarusian KGB knows everything of any importance taking place in Belarus I would even argue that argument # 2 very much supports argument # 1 .
Whatever may be the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Russian security guards had been recruited by a Belarusian firm to provide security in various countries ( Sudan and Venezuela is often named ) .
They traveled to Belarus and planned to fly out of Minsk for their final destinations .
They were delayed , apparently deliberately , then they missed their flight and were told to go and rest at a hotel which happened to be located not far from the residence of Lukashenko .
In the middle of the night , a Belarusian KGB swat team moved in with flash-bang @ @ @ @ @ @ @ everybody in spite of the fact that none of the sleepy Russians offered any kind of resistance .
No weapons of any kind were found , no evidence of any covert plans either , but the authorities declared that since these men were not drinking or harassing waitresses and since they kept to themselves , this was a clear proof that they were on a secret mission ( I am not joking ! )
.
All of the above is absolute and utter nonsense and we should not get distracted by the minutia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is what really happened .
It now appears that the Ukrainian secret service SBU ( which does nothing without Uncle Sam ’ s approval ) mounted a complex covert operation to try to get Belarus and Russia into a confrontation .
The entire operation , including recruitment , purchase of airline tickets , etc was , in fact , run from the Ukraine .
This was also the biggest mistake the Ukies did : they did not hide their actions well enough and it took the Russians special services less than 24 hours @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leak it to the media ( in Russian ) .
The fine details are still being ascertained , but the bottom line is this : the Ukrainians pretended to be a security firm looking for men with proven combat experience , especially those who fought in the Donbass against the Ukronazi forces .
Once recruited for some pretty typical guard duties , these men were to be flown to Minsk where they would miss their plane and be left waiting for the next opportunity to leave Belarus .
At this point , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ KGB and “ warned ” them about Russian “ mercenaries ” sent by Russia to kill Lukashenko or , at least , overthrow him .
It is also obvious now that the SBU specially wanted Russians with combat experience in the Donbass to then ask Belarus to hand them over to Kiev .
Such a demand was made almost immediately for most of the men in this group .
So far so “ good ” ( not really , but you know what I mean ) , but here is when the Belarusians @ @ @ @ @ @ @ strangely .
The first logical step for the Belarusian authorities should have been Lukashenko calling Putin and asking for an explanation .
Alternatively , the head of the Belarusian KGB could have called the head of the FSB and ask him for clarifications .
But , instead of doing that , the Belarusian KGB organized this ridiculous “ seizure ” of the Russian “ mercenaries ” while the latter were asleep in their hotel and had no idea whatsoever what was going on .
Next , instead of working with the Russians , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one of the most talented and most morally repugnant Ukie journalists , Dmitrii Gordon ( who proudly proclaims that he is an SBU agent ) .
But then it only got worse .
Lukashenko pounced on the opportunity to , yet again , engage in his typically long-winded rants against Russia .
He even went as far as to suggest that Belarus might extradite some of these Russian men to the Ukraine ( which , as we now know , had provided a list of wanted men to the Belarusian KGB ) .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the Russians that Lukashenko was playing some kind of dirty game in the last days before the Presidential election which took place on Sunday .
So what could explain the outright bizarre behavior of the Belarusians ?
Reason one : Simply put – Lukashenko ’ s popularity is declining as fast as the disposable income of the Belarusians .
Reason two : The US is clearly engaged in a major strategic PSYOP to seize control of Belarus .
Reason three : The Belarusian state in its current condition is simply not viable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take these one by one .
While nobody doubts the outcome of any election in Belarus , it is also pretty uncontroversial that most Belarusians do support Lukashenko .
The point is not whether Lukashenko would win , but only by how much he would win ?
The elections yesterday yielded the lowest possible and acceptable result for Lukashenko : 80 % .
This figure is really meaningless , all it shows is how good the Lukashenko regime is at winning elections .
This time , however , there appear to be more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unlike what happened in the past , the protests are not limited to Minsk and they have now spread to other cities .
So while Lukashenko was never at risk of officially losing the election , a Maidan-like protest remains a clear concern for him .
But there is much more to this story .
Following a meeting between Lukashenko and Pompeo , the US will now open a ( very big ) embassy in Minsk .
For years the West has been calling Lukashenko all sorts of names , and now it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Is that really a coincidence ?
I very much doubt it .
But it even gets much worse than that : the US is sending one of its most capable and dangerous officials to subvert Belarus : I am referring to Jeffrey Giauque , a State Department intelligence official with a long track of successive destabilization missions .
Listen to him introduce himself to the Belarusian people : In fact , it is now pretty obvious that the entire provocation with the Russian “ terrorists ” was carefully crafted and implemented by a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ SBU not been so sloppy with how they organized it all ( it took the FSB less than 24 hours to get a full and accurate picture of what had happened ) , this plan might have succeeded .
In fact , it still might .
But blaming it all on the US , the SBU and Lukashenko really does not tell the full story .
The truth is that Belarus is a completely artificial state , much more artificial even than the Ukraine , and it is a state which simply can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it hope to survive forever on Russian aid .
And while looking at the roots of Ukrainian nationalism is important and interesting , such an exercise is useless in the case of Belarus since Belarusian nationalism is something truly a-historical and artificial and which really has no foundation outside western ideological dogmas .
While the Soviet Union ’ s Marxist and generally Russophobic ideology regime always fostered the emergence of local nationalisms ( and even created previously non-existing “ nationalities ” ) , Belarusian nationalism was something which never got much traction , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ between a Russian and a Belarusian is much smaller than the differences amongst Russians who now live in a very diverse and truly multi-ethnic society .
Still , from the point of view of the Party Nomenklatura and their western curators , not splitting away Belarus from Russia while such countries as the Ukraine or Kazakhstan declared their independence was unthinkable , thus a kind of weird compromise was reached which was supposed to reassure both the people of Russia and those of Belarus .
Some agreements were made , others were endlessly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ! )
and what eventually resulted from all this is this weird and artificial statelet of only 10 million people .
As for its leader , he declared that Belarus will follow a “ multi-vector ” foreign policy which I would summarize as follows : pump as much money out of Russia as possible , while at the same time seeking support from the AngloZionist Empire .
There is another very worrisome development taking place now : in this entire business the Belarusian KGB was either hopelessly incompetent ( which it ain ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agents .
I find the second explanation much more likely .
If we now assume that the Belarusian KGB has been penetrated and compromised , then this is very bad news for Lukashenko , who might find himself in the same situation as , say , Nicolae Ceaușescu , who was betrayed by his own secret services ( we can also remember how many US/Israeli agents were in high positions around Bashar Assad until the war in Syria forced them to pick a side ) .
Frankly , while the CIA and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at some things , they are truly world-class masters in the art of corrupting officials and this might have already happened in Belarus .
Right now , there are riots in Minsk and in other cities and while in the capital the riot police have things mostly under control , there have already been cases of riot cops running for their lives to avoid being lynched by the mob .
As of the time of writing this ( Monday 21:50 UTC ) the Belarusian KGB has declared that they are hunting down the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how easy it has been for the Ukrainian SBU to trick ( or , worse , infiltrate ) the Belarusian KGB , I am not feeling very reassured by this verbiage : special services are here to take care of dangerous problems , not to make big statements .
Right now , the latest we hear from the Belarusian KGB is that they prevented the assassination of the main opposition figure Svetlana Tikhanovskaya .
Heck , this might even be true , considering that the ( clueless ) Tikhanovskaya would make a perfect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ terrible politician , should she ever be elected ) .
But this also looks like some interests inside the Belarusian KGB are courting Tikhanovskaya .
Both versions are equally bad , I think .
How serious is all this ?
There are already ( false ) rumors spread by Polish media about Lukashenko having fled Belarus in his aircraft .
This rumor is clearly designed to create the ( wrong ) impression that Lukashenko is the next Ianukovich : while I equally dislike both of these men , Lukashenko is a much tougher @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the kind of media-campaign waged now by the western , Polish and Ukie media is unprecedented in its magnitude and it will be very hard for the regime to regain control of the country .
As for Lukashenko , he now seems to have reversed his tune somehow : after accusing Russia of treating Belarus not as a brother , but as a partner , now he says that he spoke to Putin and got a 5 page document explaining it all , and now he says that Russia and Belarus will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ convincing , to say the least .
Quite logically , Lukashenko ’ s popularity in Russia , which was never that high to begin with , is now rapidly degrading , and many analysts who , in the past , praised Lukashenko for his ( supposedly ) “ firm ” policy towards the West are now openly voicing their disgust .
An increasing number of Russians are now openly wondering with this entire “ supranational union state ” concept .
As for Lukashenko ’ s much vaunted “ multi-vector policies , ” they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to sit between two chairs .
It now appears pretty obvious that the leaders of the ( ER : western ) Empire stopped hating Lukashenko only long enough to give a short lived and semi-credible appearance of benevolence ; now they are already talking about reintroducing sanctions on Belarus and on Lukashenko personally .
This is all extremely dangerous for Russia for the following reasons : • Lukashenko is an absolutely terrible “ our son of a bitch ” ( they always are ! )
to back , and his latest antics have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ much part of the problem , not of the solution .
• If Lukashenko remains in power , it will be only thanks to his ( mostly very effective ) repressive apparatus which might be enough to silence the opposition , but not enough to make Lukashenko truly popular .
• Lukashenko himself is clearly both dishonest and unprincipled .
He does not care one bit about Russia ( or Belarus for that matter ) , he cares only about himself .
In other words , as long as he remains in power @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Russia .
• If Lukashenko is overthrown , be it by a KGB plot or a Maidan-like violent insurrection , we can be pretty darn sure that whoever comes to power will be 1 ) vetted by the USA and 2 ) rabidly anti-Russian .
• Belarus does not have much of an economic significance for Russia , but for security and , even more so , military reasons Belarus is absolutely vital to the Russian security This last point needs to be further clarified .
Not only is Belarus located in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ armed forces are very well trained and equipped ( no comparison to the Ukie forces ) and they represent a major military asset for the Kremlin .
There are also Russian forces deployed in Belarus .
Finally , the contacts between the Belarusian and Russian military are very friendly and very deep .
To have NATO take over Belarus would truly be a major problem for Russia ( one that she can deal with , but it would require a major re-thinking of the threat from the West ) .
So where do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to me that if Putin does “ more of the same , ” Russia risks seriously losing Belarus which , at a time when the Ukrainian Banderastan is falling apart , would really be a crying shame .
Right now , Russia needs to contain the “ Ukrainian infection ” while , at the same time , preparing an after-Lukashenko ( before it is too late ) .
Obviously , Lukashenko will not gracefully resign , so Russia needs to find a tool in her toolkit to force him to do so .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ fully reincorporating Belarus into Russia would not only solve the “ Belarusian problem ” but that it would also solve the “ Lukashenko problem ” .
I am confident that Russia has more than enough influence and resources in Belarus to force a change .
Yes , that would be both difficult and dangerous , but not doing so could result in a much worse outcome .
Russia needs to act .
Quickly and resolutely .

Now the events in Belarus force me to address this very unpleasant topic: Belarus is facing a complex and dangerous situation which might well result in a major crisis inside Belarus and even a loss of sovereignty. But first, before we look into what just happened, let me begin with a quick “mini-primer” about Belarus. Here is what I think everybody ought to know about this country:
Belarus is a completely artificial creation, even more artificial than the Ukraine. At least in the Ukraine there were “westerners” (Galicians) who truly were not Russians at all (you can think of them as the “real Ukrainians” if you want) and whose hatred for everything Russian was every bit as rabid as the one of the Interahamwe of Rwanda. There is no meaningful equivalent to the Banderites in Belarus.
At least in the Ukraine there were “westerners” (Galicians) who truly were not Russians at all (you can think of them as the “real Ukrainians” if you want) and whose hatred for everything Russian was every bit as rabid as the one of the Interahamwe of Rwanda. There is no meaningful equivalent to the Banderites in Belarus. Lukashenko was no more pro-Russian than Ianukovich (Ukraine) . This is crucial. Lukashenko was always pro-Lukashenko, not pro-Russia. Both the West and Lukashenko like to say that Belarus is the only real Russian ally. This is false. Technically, Russia and Belarus are supranational union states. However, it is true that Lukashenko tried to use the historical identity between the Russian and Belarusian people to demand that Russia help him out over and over and over again. And until recently, Russia did.
. This is crucial. Lukashenko was always pro-Lukashenko, not pro-Russia. Both the West and Lukashenko like to say that Belarus is the only real Russian ally. This is false. Technically, Russia and Belarus are supranational union states. However, it is true that Lukashenko tried to use the historical identity between the Russian and Belarusian people to demand that Russia help him out over and over and over again. And until recently, Russia did. As a country, Belarus is a quasi perfect police state with an extremely competent and feared KGB (yes, in Belarus they kept the name) which controls everything and everybody. This is also crucial for reasons I will explain below.
with an extremely competent and feared KGB (yes, in Belarus they kept the name) which controls everything and everybody. This is also crucial for reasons I will explain below. As for the Kremlin, it always wanted to foster a reunification with Belarus but this process was never fully completed due to regular problems, and even crises, between Moscow and Minsk. Russia poured in immense sums of money to keep the Belarusian society from crashing.
but this process was never fully completed due to regular problems, and even crises, between Moscow and Minsk. Russia poured in immense sums of money to keep the Belarusian society from crashing. Finally, Belarus is really a poor country with very limited resources. For Russia, however, Belarus is a crucial military ally, one which plays a central role in Russian defense plans. If the US and NATO were successful in taking control of the country, this will be a major strategic threat for the Russian security.
These are just a few pointers to compare and contrast Belarus with the Ukraine.
Now let me summarize what just happened.
The Belarusian authorities have declared that “hundreds” of men (supposedly Russians) have been sent to Belarus with nefarious intentions. Lukashenko has since officially confirmed that he got this info from the Ukrainian SBU. The men themselves were described as terrorists, insurgents, members of the “Wagner” PMC, subversives, etc. and their goals were described as killing Lukashenko, triggering a new “maidan” in Belarus, create chaos, etc.
Frankly, the Belarusian authorities never got their story straight and, frankly again, this really makes no difference at all. Here are two things which I consider as indisputable:
Russia would never even consider using force or illegal covert operations against Lukashenko and/or Belarus The Belarusian KGB knows everything of any importance taking place in Belarus
I would even argue that argument #2 very much supports argument #1.
Whatever may be the case, it appeared that a group of Russian security guards had been recruited by a Belarusian firm to provide security in various countries (Sudan and Venezuela is often named). They traveled to Belarus and planned to fly out of Minsk for their final destinations. They were delayed, apparently deliberately, then they missed their flight and were told to go and rest at a hotel which happened to be located not far from the residence of Lukashenko. In the middle of the night, a Belarusian KGB swat team moved in with flash-bang grenades and guns drawn and brutally arrested everybody in spite of the fact that none of the sleepy Russians offered any kind of resistance. No weapons of any kind were found, no evidence of any covert plans either, but the authorities declared that since these men were not drinking or harassing waitresses and since they kept to themselves, this was a clear proof that they were on a secret mission (I am not joking!).
All of the above is absolute and utter nonsense and we should not get distracted by the minutia of this clearly fabricated pretext.
Here is what really happened.
It now appears that the Ukrainian secret service SBU (which does nothing without Uncle Sam’s approval) mounted a complex covert operation to try to get Belarus and Russia into a confrontation. The entire operation, including recruitment, purchase of airline tickets, etc was, in fact, run from the Ukraine. This was also the biggest mistake the Ukies did: they did not hide their actions well enough and it took the Russians special services less than 24 hours to figure out the entire plan and leak it to the media (in Russian). The fine details are still being ascertained, but the bottom line is this: the Ukrainians pretended to be a security firm looking for men with proven combat experience, especially those who fought in the Donbass against the Ukronazi forces. Once recruited for some pretty typical guard duties, these men were to be flown to Minsk where they would miss their plane and be left waiting for the next opportunity to leave Belarus. At this point, the SBU seems to have contacted the Belarusian KGB and “warned” them about Russian “mercenaries” sent by Russia to kill Lukashenko or, at least, overthrow him.
It is also obvious now that the SBU specially wanted Russians with combat experience in the Donbass to then ask Belarus to hand them over to Kiev. Such a demand was made almost immediately for most of the men in this group.
So far so “good” (not really, but you know what I mean), but here is when the Belarusians and Lukashenko himself started to act really strangely.
The first logical step for the Belarusian authorities should have been Lukashenko calling Putin and asking for an explanation. Alternatively, the head of the Belarusian KGB could have called the head of the FSB and ask him for clarifications. But, instead of doing that, the Belarusian KGB organized this ridiculous “seizure” of the Russian “mercenaries” while the latter were asleep in their hotel and had no idea whatsoever what was going on.
Next, instead of working with the Russians, Lukashenko just gave a long interview to one of the most talented and most morally repugnant Ukie journalists, Dmitrii Gordon (who proudly proclaims that he is an SBU agent).
But then it only got worse.
Lukashenko pounced on the opportunity to, yet again, engage in his typically long-winded rants against Russia. He even went as far as to suggest that Belarus might extradite some of these Russian men to the Ukraine (which, as we now know, had provided a list of wanted men to the Belarusian KGB). From these actions it became immediately clear to the Russians that Lukashenko was playing some kind of dirty game in the last days before the Presidential election which took place on Sunday.
So what could explain the outright bizarre behavior of the Belarusians?
Reason one: Simply put – Lukashenko’s popularity is declining as fast as the disposable income of the Belarusians.
Reason two: The US is clearly engaged in a major strategic PSYOP to seize control of Belarus.
Reason three: The Belarusian state in its current condition is simply not viable and never was.
Let’s take these one by one.
While nobody doubts the outcome of any election in Belarus, it is also pretty uncontroversial that most Belarusians do support Lukashenko. The point is not whether Lukashenko would win, but only by how much he would win? The elections yesterday yielded the lowest possible and acceptable result for Lukashenko: 80%. This figure is really meaningless, all it shows is how good the Lukashenko regime is at winning elections. This time, however, there appear to be more protests than in the past and, unlike what happened in the past, the protests are not limited to Minsk and they have now spread to other cities. So while Lukashenko was never at risk of officially losing the election, a Maidan-like protest remains a clear concern for him.
But there is much more to this story.
Following a meeting between Lukashenko and Pompeo, the US will now open a (very big) embassy in Minsk. For years the West has been calling Lukashenko all sorts of names, and now it is suddenly “all smiles”.
Is that really a coincidence?
I very much doubt it.
But it even gets much worse than that: the US is sending one of its most capable and dangerous officials to subvert Belarus: I am referring to Jeffrey Giauque, a State Department intelligence official with a long track of successive destabilization missions.
Listen to him introduce himself to the Belarusian people:
In fact, it is now pretty obvious that the entire provocation with the Russian “terrorists” was carefully crafted and implemented by a joint US-Ukrainian effort. Had the Ukie SBU not been so sloppy with how they organized it all (it took the FSB less than 24 hours to get a full and accurate picture of what had happened), this plan might have succeeded. In fact, it still might.
But blaming it all on the US, the SBU and Lukashenko really does not tell the full story.
The truth is that Belarus is a completely artificial state, much more artificial even than the Ukraine, and it is a state which simply cannot survive by itself. Neither can it hope to survive forever on Russian aid. And while looking at the roots of Ukrainian nationalism is important and interesting, such an exercise is useless in the case of Belarus since Belarusian nationalism is something truly a-historical and artificial and which really has no foundation outside western ideological dogmas.
While the Soviet Union’s Marxist and generally Russophobic ideology regime always fostered the emergence of local nationalisms (and even created previously non-existing “nationalities”), Belarusian nationalism was something which never got much traction, which is hardly surprising since any distinction between a Russian and a Belarusian is much smaller than the differences amongst Russians who now live in a very diverse and truly multi-ethnic society. Still, from the point of view of the Party Nomenklatura and their western curators, not splitting away Belarus from Russia while such countries as the Ukraine or Kazakhstan declared their independence was unthinkable, thus a kind of weird compromise was reached which was supposed to reassure both the people of Russia and those of Belarus. Some agreements were made, others were endlessly negotiated about (especially any energy deals!) and what eventually resulted from all this is this weird and artificial statelet of only 10 million people. As for its leader, he declared that Belarus will follow a “multi-vector” foreign policy which I would summarize as follows: pump as much money out of Russia as possible, while at the same time seeking support from the AngloZionist Empire.
Yes, I know, Lukashenko is called the “last dictator of Europe” and he is not popular in the West. My point is that his lack of popularity is to be credited to the West, and not to him. Over and over again, Lukashenko tried to get support (meaning “money”) from the West, and now Pompeo & Co. have apparently decided to make “their” son of a bitch “our” son of a bitch. What I mean by that Lukashenko was the textbook case of the “our son of a bitch” phenomenon, but not for the West – for Russia. I furthermore believe that like all “sons of bitches” (including “theirs” and “ours”) – Lukashenko has now turned into a liability for Russia.
There is another very worrisome development taking place now: in this entire business the Belarusian KGB was either hopelessly incompetent (which it ain’t!) or penetrated by western agents. I find the second explanation much more likely.
If we now assume that the Belarusian KGB has been penetrated and compromised, then this is very bad news for Lukashenko, who might find himself in the same situation as, say, Nicolae Ceaușescu, who was betrayed by his own secret services (we can also remember how many US/Israeli agents were in high positions around Bashar Assad until the war in Syria forced them to pick a side).
Frankly, while the CIA and the rest of them are not very good at some things, they are truly world-class masters in the art of corrupting officials and this might have already happened in Belarus.
Right now, there are riots in Minsk and in other cities and while in the capital the riot police have things mostly under control, there have already been cases of riot cops running for their lives to avoid being lynched by the mob. As of the time of writing this (Monday 21:50 UTC) the Belarusian KGB has declared that they are hunting down the worst agitators and rioters, but considering how easy it has been for the Ukrainian SBU to trick (or, worse, infiltrate) the Belarusian KGB, I am not feeling very reassured by this verbiage: special services are here to take care of dangerous problems, not to make big statements.
Right now, the latest we hear from the Belarusian KGB is that they prevented the assassination of the main opposition figure Svetlana Tikhanovskaya. Heck, this might even be true, considering that the (clueless) Tikhanovskaya would make a perfect “sacrificial lamb” (and a terrible politician, should she ever be elected). But this also looks like some interests inside the Belarusian KGB are courting Tikhanovskaya. Both versions are equally bad, I think.
How serious is all this?
Very!
There are already (false) rumors spread by Polish media about Lukashenko having fled Belarus in his aircraft. This rumor is clearly designed to create the (wrong) impression that Lukashenko is the next Ianukovich: while I equally dislike both of these men, Lukashenko is a much tougher man than Ianukovich ever was.
Furthermore, the kind of media-campaign waged now by the western, Polish and Ukie media is unprecedented in its magnitude and it will be very hard for the regime to regain control of the country.
As for Lukashenko, he now seems to have reversed his tune somehow: after accusing Russia of treating Belarus not as a brother, but as a partner, now he says that he spoke to Putin and got a 5 page document explaining it all, and now he says that Russia and Belarus will be brothers after all.
Not very convincing, to say the least.
Quite logically, Lukashenko’s popularity in Russia, which was never that high to begin with, is now rapidly degrading, and many analysts who, in the past, praised Lukashenko for his (supposedly) “firm” policy towards the West are now openly voicing their disgust. An increasing number of Russians are now openly wondering with this entire “supranational union state” concept. As for Lukashenko’s much vaunted “multi-vector policies,” they look like a banal case of trying to sit between two chairs.
It now appears pretty obvious that the leaders of the (ER: western) Empire stopped hating Lukashenko only long enough to give a short lived and semi-credible appearance of benevolence; now they are already talking about reintroducing sanctions on Belarus and on Lukashenko personally.
This is all extremely dangerous for Russia for the following reasons:
Lukashenko is an absolutely terrible “our son of a bitch” (they always are!) to back, and his latest antics have shown the Kremlin that Lukashenko is very much part of the problem, not of the solution. If Lukashenko remains in power, it will be only thanks to his (mostly very effective) repressive apparatus which might be enough to silence the opposition, but not enough to make Lukashenko truly popular. Lukashenko himself is clearly both dishonest and unprincipled. He does not care one bit about Russia (or Belarus for that matter), he cares only about himself. In other words, as long as he remains in power, Belarus will be a major concern for Russia. If Lukashenko is overthrown, be it by a KGB plot or a Maidan-like violent insurrection, we can be pretty darn sure that whoever comes to power will be 1) vetted by the USA and 2) rabidly anti-Russian. Belarus does not have much of an economic significance for Russia, but for security and, even more so, military reasons Belarus is absolutely vital to the Russian security
This last point needs to be further clarified. Not only is Belarus located in a strategically crucial location, the Belarusian armed forces are very well trained and equipped (no comparison to the Ukie forces) and they represent a major military asset for the Kremlin. There are also Russian forces deployed in Belarus. Finally, the contacts between the Belarusian and Russian military are very friendly and very deep. To have NATO take over Belarus would truly be a major problem for Russia (one that she can deal with, but it would require a major re-thinking of the threat from the West).
So where do we go from here?
It seems to me that if Putin does “more of the same,” Russia risks seriously losing Belarus which, at a time when the Ukrainian Banderastan is falling apart, would really be a crying shame. Right now, Russia needs to contain the “Ukrainian infection” while, at the same time, preparing an after-Lukashenko (before it is too late). Obviously, Lukashenko will not gracefully resign, so Russia needs to find a tool in her toolkit to force him to do so.
Personally, I have always believed that fully reincorporating Belarus into Russia would not only solve the “Belarusian problem” but that it would also solve the “Lukashenko problem”. I am confident that Russia has more than enough influence and resources in Belarus to force a change. Yes, that would be both difficult and dangerous, but not doing so could result in a much worse outcome.
Russia needs to act. Quickly and resolutely.
************


thelibertybeacon--2020-08-12--Who will be thrown to the wolves?

Who will be thrown to the wolves?

A few months back when this whole COVID19 psychological warfare attack on us started , it seemed to me that it would be orchestrated so that it could be strung out , come what may , for as long as possible so as to cause the maximum amount of inconvenience and damage to the point where everybody would so heartily sick of it all that they ’ d agree to almost anything to have it over and done with , including surrendering liberties to mad governments and letting lunatics inject us with booby trapped vaccines .
At least that is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there is no guarantee it will go the way they want .
They might just end up cheesing enough people off that they and their stooges will find themselves strung up from proverbial lamp posts .
The operators of this caper , I think , did not anticipate the degree to which resistance and awareness has exploded .
They made at least two grievous mistakes .
One was underestimating people .
They think we are cattle and can be treated as such and that is a pretty basic error because we ain ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ham-fisted job of falsifying/manipulating the statistics .
If you are going to massage the death stats , use faulty tests and so forth so as to try to fool millions of intelligent people then you need to do it more cleverly and less transparently .
It is not enough if you want to demoralise and cow an entire society to simply fool the more dimwitted .
You also need to also fool the brighter people , of whom there are millions .
It has now become so obvious that the government and media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more dangerous and deadly than it actually is that everybody except the comatose can now see it .
It has become equally obvious that this virus is similar to a seasonal flu in terms of its fatality rate , infectiousness and so forth .
See here for a reasonably apt comparison between COVID19 and influenza .
One could go on an on and on stating the ruddy obvious about the deliberately falsified death stats , the misrepresentations , exaggerations , the flawed tests and the fact that this epidemic , such as it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ purposes over , having followed pretty much the natural cycle for viruses irrespective of lockdowns or no lockdowns .
All this has been dealt with very ably elsewhere by countless observers .
A good summary of the situation , should you want to read one is here .
So the government now has a problem .
It has been caught out talking up and propagandising a pandemic so supposedly serious and terrifying that it justified tremendous damage to the country in order to “ deal ” with it .
The current virus is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the vulnerable the way influenza and other bugs are but nowhere near serious enough to justify the destruction of the economy .
The government has long since passed the point where it could have owned up and admitted it made a “ mistake ” .
It just kept right on lying and lying and lying and keeping the whole smoke-and-mirrors charade going .
It can not now do anything else because it would have to admit it essentially created a catastrophe to handle a fabricated threat .
It would have to admit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ save lives ” it actually cost us an as yet untold number of lives through insane restrictions on the ability of the NHS to do its job AND its failure to implement the known cure , hydrocychlororoquine .
It is trapped in its own lies .
I imagine there are some politicians , civil servants and “ advisors ” who are starting to sweat right now as they watch their deception dissolve under the light of public scrutiny .
This government was only elected last ruddy December !
I don ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the country in so short a space of time and we Brits have had to put up with some mind-numbingly bad or treasonous governments over the years .
Somewhere up ahead lies a reckoning .
The true economic cost of the destruction is going to be felt and it will be felt at more or less at the very point where the entire population with the exception of the comatose will know we have been played .
By that time , the media will have deserted the sinking ship and turned on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accusing fingers at its “ experts ” ( the very people it CHOSE to listen to ) and at the media .
A lot of people will be wanting to know WHY all this happened , WHO were the puppet masters pulling Johnson and Hancock ’ s strings .
If an enemy power had visited upon on our nation the level of sabotage we have just been subjected to , we would have regarded it as an act of war .
It is indeed an act of war , with key political figures @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is just that we have not as yet been able to precisely identify that enemy .
They are not , this time , a country .
In fact , the various countries of the planet have them as a common enemy , as I think Putin and Trump and possibly Xi have realised .
For sure , it will be a group of some kind and the members of that group will have names and will have to answer for their crimes .
In the meantime , that enemy , those hidden puppet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ maybe a rook in order – they hope – to save themselves .
Personally , when the-you-know-what hits the fan , I expect them to toss Boris Johnson to the wolves .
The above article was originally featured on UKReloaded

by Jon Davy
Damascus, 10/8/20
A few months back when this whole COVID19 psychological warfare attack on us started, it seemed to me that it would be orchestrated so that it could be strung out, come what may, for as long as possible so as to cause the maximum amount of inconvenience and damage to the point where everybody would so heartily sick of it all that they’d agree to almost anything to have it over and done with, including surrendering liberties to mad governments and letting lunatics inject us with booby trapped vaccines.
At least that is what they are hoping will happen but there is no guarantee it will go the way they want. They might just end up cheesing enough people off that they and their stooges will find themselves strung up from proverbial lamp posts.
The operators of this caper, I think, did not anticipate the degree to which resistance and awareness has exploded.
They made at least two grievous mistakes. One was underestimating people. They think we are cattle and can be treated as such and that is a pretty basic error because we ain’t.
The other was making a ham-fisted job of falsifying/manipulating the statistics. If you are going to massage the death stats, use faulty tests and so forth so as to try to fool millions of intelligent people then you need to do it more cleverly and less transparently. It is not enough if you want to demoralise and cow an entire society to simply fool the more dimwitted. You also need to also fool the brighter people, of whom there are millions.
It has now become so obvious that the government and media have colluded to make this virus appear more dangerous and deadly than it actually is that everybody except the comatose can now see it.
It has become equally obvious that this virus is similar to a seasonal flu in terms of its fatality rate, infectiousness and so forth. See here for a reasonably apt comparison between COVID19 and influenza.
One could go on an on and on stating the ruddy obvious about the deliberately falsified death stats, the misrepresentations, exaggerations, the flawed tests and the fact that this epidemic, such as it was, is for all intents and purposes over, having followed pretty much the natural cycle for viruses irrespective of lockdowns or no lockdowns. All this has been dealt with very ably elsewhere by countless observers. A good summary of the situation, should you want to read one is here.
So the government now has a problem.
It has been caught out talking up and propagandising a pandemic so supposedly serious and terrifying that it justified tremendous damage to the country in order to “deal” with it.
The current virus is, by the way, serious enough for the vulnerable the way influenza and other bugs are but nowhere near serious enough to justify the destruction of the economy.
The government has long since passed the point where it could have owned up and admitted it made a “mistake”. It just kept right on lying and lying and lying and keeping the whole smoke-and-mirrors charade going.
It cannot now do anything else because it would have to admit it essentially created a catastrophe to handle a fabricated threat. It would have to admit, too, that in order to “save lives” it actually cost us an as yet untold number of lives through insane restrictions on the ability of the NHS to do its job AND its failure to implement the known cure, hydrocychlororoquine.
It is trapped in its own lies. I imagine there are some politicians, civil servants and “advisors” who are starting to sweat right now as they watch their deception dissolve under the light of public scrutiny.
This government was only elected last ruddy December! I don’t recall any government overseeing so much damage to the country in so short a space of time and we Brits have had to put up with some mind-numbingly bad or treasonous governments over the years.
Somewhere up ahead lies a reckoning. The true economic cost of the destruction is going to be felt and it will be felt at more or less at the very point where the entire population with the exception of the comatose will know we have been played.
By that time, the media will have deserted the sinking ship and turned on the government. The government will point accusing fingers at its “experts” (the very people it CHOSE to listen to) and at the media. A lot of people will be wanting to know WHY all this happened, WHO were the puppet masters pulling Johnson and Hancock’s strings.
If an enemy power had visited upon on our nation the level of sabotage we have just been subjected to, we would have regarded it as an act of war.
It is indeed an act of war, with key political figures in collaboration with the enemy.
It is just that we have not as yet been able to precisely identify that enemy.
They are not, this time, a country. In fact, the various countries of the planet have them as a common enemy, as I think Putin and Trump and possibly Xi have realised.
For sure, it will be a group of some kind and the members of that group will have names and will have to answer for their crimes.
In the meantime, that enemy, those hidden puppet masters, will sacrifice some pawns or maybe a rook in order – they hope – to save themselves.
Personally, when the-you-know-what hits the fan, I expect them to toss Boris Johnson to the wolves.
The above article was originally featured on UKReloaded
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-08-12--China lockdown: war against the population & containing the virus

The China lockdown : origin of the war against the population of Earth , pretense of containing the virus Yes , once again , dear reader , we buckle up and venture into the mad , mad world where no one proved a new and unique coronavirus exists , but where all leaders assume it does .
Brief background : once a person accepts the notion that a new virus is exploding in epic fashion across the world , he is committed to a few inescapable propositions that flow from this assumption .
The most important one : nothing will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ natural immunity by the population .
And how would this natural immunity be gained ?
Through mass exposure to the germ .
In other words , living life is the answer .
Not containment .
Not lockdowns .
The genie does not go back in the bottle .
During lockdowns , millions of people would , sitting in their homes , percolate the virus—and once let out of prison , the spread would escalate unchecked .
Everywhere .
If you don ’ t think that is a correct picture ( of their “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public health and press accounts detailing how quickly this supposed germ advanced across the planet .
A lightning strike here , a lightning strike there , a strike everywhere .
For example , medicalxpress.com , July 30 , 2020 , reports on a CDC study published in The Lancet : “ During the first 11 weeks of the COVID-19 outbreak , 32,459 COVID-19 cases were identified from 99 countries and locations outside mainland China.
” Try putting that back in the bottle .
Again—the only method for victory would be mass exposure , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This is the implication of accepting the notion of a new virus rushing out from a source .
So the Chinese regime achieved nothing by locking down 50 million people .
Less than nothing .
Of course , the mass lockdown model was soon copied by every nation on Earth .
Amidst bursts of ecstasy , the World Health Organization and the CDC had their decades-long dream realized : CONTROL .
Medical dictatorship pressing down on billions of people .
There is more to say about the Chinese lockdown .
Even falsely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how did Chinese authorities diagnose the early cases ?
They had a limited number of PCR test kits .
Those they did have would register many false positives , based on cross-reactions with harmless coronaviruses—because that is what the PCR does .
On top of that , Chinese researchers and doctors were claiming pneumonia was the cardinal symptom of the new epidemic .
But studies indicate roughly 300,000 people in China die every year of pneumonia—going back long before the supposed emergence of the new virus .
Early in 2020 , China health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ different diagnostic test : CT scans of the lungs .
Really ?
To detect the presence of a new virus ?
What test could be more irrelevant ?
It would be on the order of walking around Beijing with a blindfold on searching for a needle in a haystack in Detroit .
Still more : If Chinese virologists working in their Wuhan labs trying to characterize “ the new coronavirus ” had merely looked out the window , they would have seen the cause of the pneumonia in the city : rank deadly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2019 , risking arrest and disappearance , residents of several large Chinese cities , including Wuhan , had gone out into the streets protesting the air quality , which contains an unprecedented toxic mix of early industrial and modern industrial compounds .
But this fact was ignored .
Instead , 50 million Chinese were imprisoned—ending those street protests , as well as the Hong Kong rebellion .
Non-discovery of a new virus ; lockdown of 50 million people , the wrong action for producing immunity against a virus ; the emulation of that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we are .
I decided to go back and comb through statements of mainstream epidemiologists who are supposed to be on “ the good side of the argument.
” Of course , they all believe in the existence of the virus .
I was not impressed by their remarks .
At some point they appear to gargle and choke and recommend half-measures .
We should open up this but lock down that .
We could have put in place more stringent measures early on .
They dance around the fact that , once @ @ @ @ @ @ @ virus launching out into the world , there is only one cure : the acquisition of mass immunity .
And you get that by living .
Exposing yourself to the germ .
You can ’ t dance your way out of it .
I ’ ve never accepted the existence of a new virus .
I ’ ve written close to two hundred articles painting an entirely different picture of what is going on , and I ’ ve presented a great deal of evidence for my view .
I continue to do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t forgotten about the vaccination addicts who actually believe injecting seven billion people is both doable and effective .
Stepping into their world of fantasy and pseudoscience , even their own experts are now claiming COVID immunity—which they measure by antibody response—wanes quickly .
A vaccine would need to be injected in annual boosters , just as the seasonal flu vaccine is .
So how are they doing with that flu vaccine ?
They report millions of flu cases and hundreds of thousands of deaths EVERY YEAR .
If that ’ s mass @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ship .
They ’ re going to shoot up seven billion people every year and still not attain immunity ?
A twisted pipe dream , even if you accept conventional vaccine theory—and I don ’ t .
We ’ re not even getting into devastating vaccine “ adverse effects , ” a subject I ’ ve been writing about and exposing for 30 years .
Suffice to say , Vaccine King Bill Gates is not only a raging sociopath , he ’ s wrong about his own “ science.
” Judging by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ logic of his position would drive him to the conclusion that a severe and permanent and forever lockdown of the global population is necessary .
Unless and until the population could be reduced to an exceedingly minor fraction of its present total .
Now , if a vaccination could accomplish THAT… ( TLB ) published this original article from the blog of Jon Rappoport with our appreciation for his contribution to raise health and freedom awareness .
Jon Rappoport is the author of three explosive collections , THE MATRIX REVEALED , EXIT FROM @ @ @ @ @ @ @ MATRIX , Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California .
He maintains a consulting practice for private clients , the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power .
Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize , he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years , writing articles on politics , medicine , and health for CBS Healthwatch , LA Weekly , Spin Magazine , Stern , and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe .
Jon has delivered lectures and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ logic , and creative power to audiences around the world .
You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here .

The China lockdown: origin of the war against the population of Earth, pretense of containing the virus
Jon Rappoport
Yes, once again, dear reader, we buckle up and venture into the mad, mad world where no one proved a new and unique coronavirus exists, but where all leaders assume it does.
Brief background: once a person accepts the notion that a new virus is exploding in epic fashion across the world, he is committed to a few inescapable propositions that flow from this assumption. The most important one: nothing will stop the virus except the acquisition of natural immunity by the population.
And how would this natural immunity be gained? Through mass exposure to the germ. In other words, living life is the answer.
Not containment. Not lockdowns. The genie does not go back in the bottle.
During lockdowns, millions of people would, sitting in their homes, percolate the virus—and once let out of prison, the spread would escalate unchecked. Everywhere.
If you don’t think that is a correct picture (of their “virus world”), read numerous public health and press accounts detailing how quickly this supposed germ advanced across the planet. A lightning strike here, a lightning strike there, a strike everywhere.
For example, medicalxpress.com, July 30, 2020, reports on a CDC study published in The Lancet: “During the first 11 weeks of the COVID-19 outbreak, 32,459 COVID-19 cases were identified from 99 countries and locations outside mainland China.” Try putting that back in the bottle.
Again—the only method for victory would be mass exposure, through living, leading to mass immunity.
This is the implication of accepting the notion of a new virus rushing out from a source.
So the Chinese regime achieved nothing by locking down 50 million people. Less than nothing.
Of course, the mass lockdown model was soon copied by every nation on Earth. Amidst bursts of ecstasy, the World Health Organization and the CDC had their decades-long dream realized: CONTROL. Medical dictatorship pressing down on billions of people.
There is more to say about the Chinese lockdown. Even falsely assuming a new virus was discovered, how did Chinese authorities diagnose the early cases? They had a limited number of PCR test kits. Those they did have would register many false positives, based on cross-reactions with harmless coronaviruses—because that is what the PCR does.
On top of that, Chinese researchers and doctors were claiming pneumonia was the cardinal symptom of the new epidemic. But studies indicate roughly 300,000 people in China die every year of pneumonia—going back long before the supposed emergence of the new virus.
Early in 2020, China health authorities announced they were resorting to a different diagnostic test: CT scans of the lungs. Really? To detect the presence of a new virus? What test could be more irrelevant? It would be on the order of walking around Beijing with a blindfold on searching for a needle in a haystack in Detroit.
But nothing deterred the WHO/CDC or Bill Gates or Anthony Fauci or Donald Trump or the motley collection of political leaders around the globe. Lockdowns were laid on.
Still more: If Chinese virologists working in their Wuhan labs trying to characterize “the new coronavirus” had merely looked out the window, they would have seen the cause of the pneumonia in the city: rank deadly air pollution.
In the summer of 2019, risking arrest and disappearance, residents of several large Chinese cities, including Wuhan, had gone out into the streets protesting the air quality, which contains an unprecedented toxic mix of early industrial and modern industrial compounds.
But this fact was ignored. Instead, 50 million Chinese were imprisoned—ending those street protests, as well as the Hong Kong rebellion.
Non-discovery of a new virus; lockdown of 50 million people, the wrong action for producing immunity against a virus; the emulation of that action across the world; and here we are.
I decided to go back and comb through statements of mainstream epidemiologists who are supposed to be on “the good side of the argument.” Of course, they all believe in the existence of the virus.
I was not impressed by their remarks. At some point they appear to gargle and choke and recommend half-measures. We should open up this but lock down that. We could have put in place more stringent measures early on. They dance around the fact that, once you accept the existence of a new virus launching out into the world, there is only one cure: the acquisition of mass immunity. And you get that by living. Exposing yourself to the germ.
You can’t dance your way out of it.
I’ve never accepted the existence of a new virus. I’ve written close to two hundred articles painting an entirely different picture of what is going on, and I’ve presented a great deal of evidence for my view. I continue to do that.
Postscript: I haven’t forgotten about the vaccination addicts who actually believe injecting seven billion people is both doable and effective. Stepping into their world of fantasy and pseudoscience, even their own experts are now claiming COVID immunity—which they measure by antibody response—wanes quickly.
A vaccine would need to be injected in annual boosters, just as the seasonal flu vaccine is. So how are they doing with that flu vaccine? They report millions of flu cases and hundreds of thousands of deaths EVERY YEAR. If that’s mass immunity, a chicken is a rocket ship.
They’re going to shoot up seven billion people every year and still not attain immunity? A twisted pipe dream, even if you accept conventional vaccine theory—and I don’t.
We’re not even getting into devastating vaccine “adverse effects,” a subject I’ve been writing about and exposing for 30 years.
Suffice to say, Vaccine King Bill Gates is not only a raging sociopath, he’s wrong about his own “science.”
Judging by the failure of the flu vaccine, the logic of his position would drive him to the conclusion that a severe and permanent and forever lockdown of the global population is necessary. Unless and until the population could be reduced to an exceedingly minor fraction of its present total.
Now, if a vaccination could accomplish THAT…
SOURCE:
medicalxpress.com/news/2020-07-reveals-cases-covid-china-based.html
*********
Pictorial content and emphasis added by (TLB) editors
(TLB) published this original article from the blog of Jon Rappoport with our appreciation for his contribution to raise health and freedom awareness.
Jon Rappoport is the author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-08-12--Congressman demands Fauci, Birx exit stage Left

The chairman of the conservative House Freedom Caucus is urging Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Birx to step aside from the White House coronavirus response team , arguing their prescriptions for the pandemic have done more harm than good .
“ Their policies and solutions do not value and protect ALL lives .
Our future depends on these two exiting the stage immediately , ” Rep. Andy Biggs , R-Ariz. , wrote in a column for Townhall over the weekend .
In a tweet , he added : “ Dr .
Fauci and Dr. Birx have ca ( u @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with their COVID-19 prescriptions than can ever be restored.
” Fauci and Birx have repeatedly defended their work , saying the ebb and rise of coronavirus has been the result of states failing to stay locked down long enough and not an outcome of their recommendations .
“ The sell-by date of Dr. Anthony Fauci ’ s usefulness has expired .
He should exit the public stage that he so obviously enjoys .
His long tenure as a healthcare bureaucrat should come to an end .
He has proven more adept as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the lawmaker wrote .
( TLB ) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News Some emphasis and pictorial content added by ( TLB ) Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

GOP House member demands Fauci, Birx exit stage over pandemic handling
‘Their policies and solutions do not value and protect ALL lives,’ ~Rep. Andy Biggs
By John Solomon
The chairman of the conservative House Freedom Caucus is urging Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Birx to step aside from the White House coronavirus response team, arguing their prescriptions for the pandemic have done more harm than good.
“Their policies and solutions do not value and protect ALL lives. Our future depends on these two exiting the stage immediately,” Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., wrote in a column for Townhall over the weekend.
In a tweet, he added: “Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx have ca(u)sed more damage to this nation with their COVID-19 prescriptions than can ever be restored.”
Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx have cased more damage to this nation with their COVID-19 prescriptions than can ever be restored. Their policies and solutions do not value and protect ALL lives. Our future depends on these two exiting the stage immediately. https://t.co/1hbozdHtHh — Rep Andy Biggs (@RepAndyBiggsAZ) August 7, 2020
Fauci and Birx have repeatedly defended their work, saying the ebb and rise of coronavirus has been the result of states failing to stay locked down long enough and not an outcome of their recommendations.
Biggs sharply rejected those arguments in his article, suggesting Fauci has been leading the nation’s infectious disease agency for too long and seemed more interested in publicity like magazine covers and baseball game appearances than research.
“The sell-by date of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s usefulness has expired. He should exit the public stage that he so obviously enjoys. His long tenure as a healthcare bureaucrat should come to an end. He has proven more adept as a showman than as a doctor,” the lawmaker wrote.
_________
THE FACTS INSIDE OUR REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK
Links
Other Media
*********
(TLB) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News
Some emphasis and pictorial content added by (TLB)
Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.