thelibertybeacon--2020-04-30--Unsealed FBI Handwritten Notes, Agents Plotted Trap on Flynn [Video]

: Are we finally going to see some consequences for a deep state lackey ?
Shortly after the post below was completed , US Congresswoman Elise Stefanik tweeted the following : Here is the clip : U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan unsealed four pages of stunning FBI emails and handwritten notes Wednesday , regarding former Trump National Security Advisor Michael Flynn , which allegedly reveal the retired three star general was targeted by senior FBI officials for prosecution , stated Flynn ’ s defense attorney Sidney Powell .
Those notes and emails revealed that the retired three-star general @ @ @ @ @ @ @ perjury trap by the senior members of the bureau and agents charged with investigating the now-debunked allegations that President Donald Trump ’ s campaign colluded with Russia , said Sidney Powell , the defense lawyer representing Flynn .
Moreover , the Department of Justice released 11 more pages of documents Wednesday afternoon , according to Powell .
While we await Judge Sullivan ’ s order to unseal the exhibits from Friday , the government has just provided 11 more pages even more appalling that the Friday production .
We have requested the redaction @ @ @ @ @ @ @ BarbaraRedgate pic.twitter.com/YPEjZWbdvo “ What is especially terrifying is that without the integrity of Attorney General Bill Barr and U.S. Attorney Jensen , we still would not have this clear exculpatory information as Mr. Van Grack and the prosecutors have opposed every request we have made , ” said Powell .
It appears , based on the notes and emails that the Department of Justice was determined at the time to prosecute Flynn , regardless of what they found , Powell said .
“ The FBI pre-planned a deliberate attack on Gen. Flynn and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1001 in the interview despite full knowledge of that practice , ” Powell said in a statement .
“ The FBI planned it as a perjury trap at best and in so doing put it in writing stating ‘ what is our goal ?
Truth/ Admission or to get him to lie so we can prosecute him or get him fired.
” The documents , reviewed and obtained by SaraACarter.com , reveal that senior FBI officials discussed strategies for targeting and setting up Flynn , prior to interviewing him at the White House @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was that interview at the White House with former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and FBI Special Agent Joe Pientka that led Flynn , now 61 , to plead guilty after months of pressure by prosecutors , financial strain and threats to prosecute his son .
Powell filed a motion earlier this year to withdraw Flynn ’ s guilty plea and to dismiss his case for egregious government misconduct .
Flynn pleaded guilty in December 2017 , under duress by government prosecutors , to lying to investigators about his conversations with Russian diplomat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This January , however , he withdrew his guilty plea in the U.S. District Court in Washington , D.C .
He stated that he was “ innocent of this crime ” and was coerced by the FBI and prosecutors under threats that would charge his son with a crime .
He filed to withdraw his guilty plea after DOJ prosecutors went back on their word and asked the judge to sentence Flynn to up to six months in prison , accusing him of not cooperating in another case against his former partner .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ be fine but by then Powell , his attorney , had already filed to withdraw his guilty plea .
The documents reveal that prior to the interview with Flynn in January , 2017 the FBI had already come to the conclusion that Flynn was guilty and beyond that the officials were working together to see how best to corner the 33-year military veteran and former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency .
The bureau deliberately chose not to show him the evidence of his phone conversation to help him in his recollection of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Even stranger , the agents that interviewed Flynn later admitted that they didn ’ t believe he lied during the interview with them .
Powell told this reporter last week that the documents produced by the government are “ stunning Brady evidence ’ proving Flynn was deliberately set up and framed by corrupt agents at the top of the FBI to target President Trump .
She noted earlier this week in her motion that the evidence “ also defeats any argument that the interview of Mr. Flynn on January 24 was material to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deliberately suppressed this evidence from the inception of this prosecution—knowing there was no crime by Mr. Flynn.
” Powell told this reporter Wednesday that the order by Sullivan to unseal the documents in Exhibit 3 in the supplement to Flynn ’ s motion to dismiss for egregious government conduct is exposing the truth to the public .
She said it ’ s “ easy to see that he was set up and that Mr. Flynn was the insurance policy for the FBI.
” Powell ’ s reference to the ‘ insurance policy , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thousands of texts exchanged by former FBI lawyer Lisa Page and her then-lover former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok .
In an Aug. 15 , 2016 , text from Strzok to Page he states , “ I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy ’ s ( former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe ) office — that there ’ s no way he gets elected — but I ’ m afraid we can ’ t take that risk .
It ’ s like an insurance policy in the unlikely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ new documents were turned over to Powell , by U.S. Attorney Timothy Shea .
They were discovered after an extensive review by the attorneys appointed by U.S. Attorney General William Barr to review Flynn ’ s case , which includes U.S. Attorney of St. Louis , Jeff Jensen .
In one of the emails dated Jan. 23 , 2017 , FBI lawyer Lisa Page , who at the time was having an affair with Strzok and who worked closely with him on the case discussed the charges the bureau would bring on Flynn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ House took place .
Those email exchanges were prepared for former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe , who was fired by the DOJ for lying multiple times to investigators with DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz ’ s office .
Former FBI Director James Comey , who was fired by President Trump for his conduct , revealed during an interview with Nicolle Wallace last year that he sent the FBI agents to interview Flynn at the White House under circumstances he would have never done to another administration .
“ I probably wouldn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with in a more organized investigation , a more organized administration , ” Comey said .
“ In the George W. Bush administration … or the Obama administration , two men that all of us , perhaps , have increased appreciation for over the last two years.
” In the Jan 23 , email Page asks Strzok the day before he interviews Flynn at the White House : “ I have a question for you .
Could the admonition re 1001 be given at the beginning at the interview ?
Or does it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agents believe to be false ?
Does the policy speak to that ?
( I feel bad that I don ’ t know this but I don ’ t remember ever having to do this !
Plus I ’ ve only charged it once in the context of lying to a federal probation officer ) .
It seems to be if the former , then it would be an easy way to just casually slip that in .
“ Of course as you know sir , federal law makes it a crime to… @ @ @ @ @ @ @ haven ’ t read the policy lately , but if I recall correctly , you can say it at any time .
I ’ m 90 percent sure about that , but I can check in the am .
In the motion filed earlier this week , Powell stated “ since August 2016 at the latest , partisan FBI and DOJ leaders conspired to destroy Mr. Flynn .
These documents show in their own handwriting and emails that they intended either to create an offense they could prosecute or at least get him @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Mr. Van Grack ’ s and the SCO ’ s prosecution despite their knowledge there was no crime by Mr. Flynn.
” Attached to the email is handwritten notes regarding Flynn that are stunning on their face .
It is lists of how the agents will guide him in an effort to get him to trip up on his answers during their questioning and what charges they could bring against him .
“ If we get him to admit to breaking the Logan Act , give facts to DOJ & have them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Or if he initially lies , then we present him ( not legible ) & he admits it , document for DOJ , & let them decide how to address it.
” The next two points reveal that the agents were concerned about how their interview with Flynn would be perceived saying “ if we ’ re seen as playing games , WH ( White House ) will be furious.
” “ Protect our institution by not playing games , ” the last point on the first half of the hand @ @ @ @ @ @ @ yesterday that we shouldn ’ t show Flynn ( redacted ) if he didn ’ t admit • I thought @ it last night , I believe we should rethink this • What is ( not legible ) ?
Truth/admission or to get him to lie , so we can prosecute him or get him fired ?
• we regularly show subjects evidence , with the goal of getting them to admit their wrongdoing • I don ’ t see how getting someone to admit their wrongdoing is going easy on him • @ @ @ @ @ @ @ breaking the Logan Act , give facts to DOJ & have them decide • Or if he initially lies , then we present him ( not legible ) & he admits it , document for DOJ , & let them decide how to address it • If we ’ re seen as playing games , WH will be furious • Protect our institution by not playing games • we have case on Flynn & Russians • Our goal is to ( not legible ) • Our goal is to determine if Mike Flynn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if he lies @ relationship w/ Russians It appears evident from an email from former FBI agent Strzok , who interviewed Flynn at the White House to then FBI General Counsel James Baker , who is no longer with the FBI and was himself under investigation for leaking alleged national security information to the media .
The email was a series of questions to prepare McCabe for his phone conversation with Flynn on the day the agents went to interview him at the White House .
These questions would be questions that Flynn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over to interview him .
I ’ m sure he ’ s thought through these , but for DD ’ s ( referencing Deputy Director Andrew McCabe ) consideration about how to answer in advance of his call with Flynn : Am I the subject of an investigation ?
Is it an espionage investigation ?
Do I need an attorney ?
Do I need to tell Priebus ?
The President ?
Will you tell Priebus ?
The President ?
Will you tell the WH what I tell you ?
What happens to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you ?
Will you need to interview other people ?
Will our interview be released publically ?
Will the substance of our interview be released ?
How long will this take ( depends on his cooperation – I ’ d plan 45 minutes ) ?
Can we do this over the phone ?
I can explain all this right now , I did this , this , this [ do you shut him down ?
Hear him out ?
Conduct the interview if he starts talking ?
Do you want another agent/witness standing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ? ]
Imagine having your life and reputation ruined by rogue US govt .
officials .
Then years later when the plot finally comes to light the first thing you do is post an American flag .
This is the guy they wanted you to believe was a Russian asset .
🙄 https : //t.co/TI768Vijn2 Added ZeroHedge content and other editing by ( TLB ) Related from Judicial Watch : Emails Show Extensive Communications Between Senior Defense Official and Columnist Who Published Leaked Info on Flynn Calls with Russian Ambassador The Liberty Beacon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( TLB ) Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Unsealed FBI Handwritten Notes And Emails Reveal Agents Plotted Perjury Trap On Flynn
(TLB) Editor: Before we get into Sara’s article, we call your attention to this short up-date from ZeroHedge.
***
Update (2030ET) : Are we finally going to see some consequences for a deep state lackey?
Shortly after the post below was completed, US Congresswoman Elise Stefanik tweeted the following:
Devastating flashback clip of Comey just aired on @marthamaccallum show. When asked who went around the protocol of going through the WH Counsel’s office and instead decided to send the FBI agents into White House for the Flynn perjury trap… …Comey smugly responds “I sent them.”
Here is the clip:
@comey is preparing for prison and hoping to avoid the death penalty. Will Obama be brought down too? pic.twitter.com/Vai2s5xXwn — 🇺🇸 Beyond Reproach 🇺🇸 (@BeyondReproach5) April 30, 2020
By Sara Carter
U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan unsealed four pages of stunning FBI emails and handwritten notes Wednesday, regarding former Trump National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, which allegedly reveal the retired three star general was targeted by senior FBI officials for prosecution, stated Flynn’s defense attorney Sidney Powell. Those notes and emails revealed that the retired three-star general appeared to be set up for a perjury trap by the senior members of the bureau and agents charged with investigating the now-debunked allegations that President Donald Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia, said Sidney Powell, the defense lawyer representing Flynn. Moreover, the Department of Justice released 11 more pages of documents Wednesday afternoon, according to Powell. While we await Judge Sullivan’s order to unseal the exhibits from Friday, the government has just provided 11 more pages even more appalling that the Friday production. We have requested the redaction process begin immediately.@GenFlynn @BarbaraRedgate pic.twitter.com/YPEjZWbdvo — Sidney Powell 🇺🇸⭐⭐⭐ (@SidneyPowell1) April 29, 2020 “What is especially terrifying is that without the integrity of Attorney General Bill Barr and U.S. Attorney Jensen, we still would not have this clear exculpatory information as Mr. Van Grack and the prosecutors have opposed every request we have made,” said Powell. It appears, based on the notes and emails that the Department of Justice was determined at the time to prosecute Flynn, regardless of what they found, Powell said. “The FBI pre-planned a deliberate attack on Gen. Flynn and willfully chose to ignore mention of Section 1001 in the interview despite full knowledge of that practice,” Powell said in a statement. “The FBI planned it as a perjury trap at best and in so doing put it in writing stating ‘what is our goal? Truth/ Admission or to get him to lie so we can prosecute him or get him fired.” The documents, reviewed and obtained by SaraACarter.com, reveal that senior FBI officials discussed strategies for targeting and setting up Flynn, prior to interviewing him at the White House on Jan. 24, 2017. It was that interview at the White House with former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and FBI Special Agent Joe Pientka that led Flynn, now 61, to plead guilty after months of pressure by prosecutors, financial strain and threats to prosecute his son. Powell filed a motion earlier this year to withdraw Flynn’s guilty plea and to dismiss his case for egregious government misconduct. Flynn pleaded guilty in December 2017, under duress by government prosecutors, to lying to investigators about his conversations with Russian diplomat Sergey Kislyak about sanctions on Russia. This January, however, he withdrew his guilty plea in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. He stated that he was “innocent of this crime” and was coerced by the FBI and prosecutors under threats that would charge his son with a crime. He filed to withdraw his guilty plea after DOJ prosecutors went back on their word and asked the judge to sentence Flynn to up to six months in prison, accusing him of not cooperating in another case against his former partner. Then prosecutors backtracked and said probation would be fine but by then Powell, his attorney, had already filed to withdraw his guilty plea. The documents reveal that prior to the interview with Flynn in January, 2017 the FBI had already come to the conclusion that Flynn was guilty and beyond that the officials were working together to see how best to corner the 33-year military veteran and former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency. The bureau deliberately chose not to show him the evidence of his phone conversation to help him in his recollection of events, which is standard procedure. Even stranger, the agents that interviewed Flynn later admitted that they didn’t believe he lied during the interview with them. Powell told this reporter last week that the documents produced by the government are “stunning Brady evidence’ proving Flynn was deliberately set up and framed by corrupt agents at the top of the FBI to target President Trump. She noted earlier this week in her motion that the evidence “also defeats any argument that the interview of Mr. Flynn on January 24 was material to any ‘investigation.’ The government has deliberately suppressed this evidence from the inception of this prosecution—knowing there was no crime by Mr. Flynn.”
Powell told this reporter Wednesday that the order by Sullivan to unseal the documents in Exhibit 3 in the supplement to Flynn’s motion to dismiss for egregious government conduct is exposing the truth to the public. She said it’s “easy to see that he was set up and that Mr. Flynn was the insurance policy for the FBI.” Powell’s reference to the ‘insurance policy,’ is based on one of the thousands of texts exchanged by former FBI lawyer Lisa Page and her then-lover former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok. In an Aug. 15, 2016, text from Strzok to Page he states, “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s (former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe) office — that there’s no way he gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before 40.” The new documents were turned over to Powell, by U.S. Attorney Timothy Shea. They were discovered after an extensive review by the attorneys appointed by U.S. Attorney General William Barr to review Flynn’s case, which includes U.S. Attorney of St. Louis, Jeff Jensen. In one of the emails dated Jan. 23, 2017, FBI lawyer Lisa Page, who at the time was having an affair with Strzok and who worked closely with him on the case discussed the charges the bureau would bring on Flynn before the actual interview at the White House took place. Those email exchanges were prepared for former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who was fired by the DOJ for lying multiple times to investigators with DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s office. Former FBI Director James Comey, who was fired by President Trump for his conduct, revealed during an interview with Nicolle Wallace last year that he sent the FBI agents to interview Flynn at the White House under circumstances he would have never done to another administration. “I probably wouldn’t have done or maybe gotten away with in a more organized investigation, a more organized administration,” Comey said. “In the George W. Bush administration … or the Obama administration, two men that all of us, perhaps, have increased appreciation for over the last two years.” In the Jan 23, email Page asks Strzok the day before he interviews Flynn at the White House: “I have a question for you. Could the admonition re 1001 be given at the beginning at the interview? Or does it have to come following a statement which agents believe to be false? Does the policy speak to that? (I feel bad that I don’t know this but I don’t remember ever having to do this! Plus I’ve only charged it once in the context of lying to a federal probation officer). It seems to be if the former, then it would be an easy way to just casually slip that in. “Of course as you know sir, federal law makes it a crime to…” Strzok’s response: I haven’t read the policy lately, but if I recall correctly, you can say it at any time. I’m 90 percent sure about that, but I can check in the am. In the motion filed earlier this week, Powell stated “since August 2016 at the latest, partisan FBI and DOJ leaders conspired to destroy Mr. Flynn. These documents show in their own handwriting and emails that they intended either to create an offense they could prosecute or at least get him fired. Then came the incredible malfeasance of Mr. Van Grack’s and the SCO’s prosecution despite their knowledge there was no crime by Mr. Flynn.” Attached to the email is handwritten notes regarding Flynn that are stunning on their face. It is lists of how the agents will guide him in an effort to get him to trip up on his answers during their questioning and what charges they could bring against him. “If we get him to admit to breaking the Logan Act, give facts to DOJ & have them decide,” state the handwritten notes. “Or if he initially lies, then we present him (not legible) & he admits it, document for DOJ, & let them decide how to address it.” The next two points reveal that the agents were concerned about how their interview with Flynn would be perceived saying “if we’re seen as playing games, WH (White House) will be furious.” “Protect our institution by not playing games,” the last point on the first half of the hand written notes state. From the handwritten note: Afterwards: interview
I agreed yesterday that we shouldn’t show Flynn (redacted) if he didn’t admit
I thought @ it last night, I believe we should rethink this
What is (not legible) ? Truth/admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?
we regularly show subjects evidence, with the goal of getting them to admit their wrongdoing
I don’t see how getting someone to admit their wrongdoing is going easy on him
If we get him to admit to breaking the Logan Act, give facts to DOJ & have them decide
Or if he initially lies, then we present him (not legible) & he admits it, document for DOJ, & let them decide how to address it
If we’re seen as playing games, WH will be furious
Protect our institution by not playing games (Left column) we have case on Flynn & Russians
Our goal is to (not legible)
Our goal is to determine if Mike Flynn is going to tell the truth or if he lies @ relationship w/ Russians
can quote (redacted)
Shouldn’t (redacted Review (not legible) stand alone It appears evident from an email from former FBI agent Strzok, who interviewed Flynn at the White House to then FBI General Counsel James Baker, who is no longer with the FBI and was himself under investigation for leaking alleged national security information to the media. The email was a series of questions to prepare McCabe for his phone conversation with Flynn on the day the agents went to interview him at the White House. These questions would be questions that Flynn may ask McCabe before sending the agents over to interview him. Email from Peter Strzok, cc’d to FBI General Counsel James Baker: (January 24, 2017) I’m sure he’s thought through these, but for DD’s (referencing Deputy Director Andrew McCabe) consideration about how to answer in advance of his call with Flynn: Am I in trouble? Am I the subject of an investigation? Is it a criminal investigation? Is it an espionage investigation? Do I need an attorney? Do I need to tell Priebus? The President? Will you tell Priebus? The President? Will you tell the WH what I tell you? What happens to the information/who will you tell what I tell you? Will you need to interview other people? Will our interview be released publically? Will the substance of our interview be released? How long will this take (depends on his cooperation – I’d plan 45 minutes)? Can we do this over the phone? I can explain all this right now, I did this, this, this [do you shut him down? Hear him out? Conduct the interview if he starts talking? Do you want another agent/witness standing by in case he starts doing this?] Thanks,
Pete ********* (TLB) adds this closing thought… Imagine having your life and reputation ruined by rogue US govt. officials. Then years later when the plot finally comes to light the first thing you do is post an American flag. This is the guy they wanted you to believe was a Russian asset. 🙄 https://t.co/TI768Vijn2 — Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) April 30, 2020 ********* (TLB) published this article from Sara Carter.com Added ZeroHedge content and other editing by (TLB) Related from Judicial Watch: Emails Show Extensive Communications Between Senior Defense Official and Columnist Who Published Leaked Info on Flynn Calls with Russian Ambassador •••• •••• Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-04-30--Chief Public Health Officer of Canada Advocates ‘Tracking Bracelets’ [Video]

Canada ’ s current Chief Public Health Officer appeared in a recently resurfaced 2010 documentary in which she advocated using mandatory “ tracking bracelets ” for people who refuse to take a vaccine after a virus outbreak .
Theresa Tam ( Pictured here ) has become one of the faces of Canada ’ s response to coronavirus , appearing in public service announcements encouraging social distancing .
On 23 April , she was was appointed by Justin Trudeau to be a member of the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force , despite having previously asserted that there was “ no reason to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in January .
As late as January 29 , she told Canadians , “ It ’ s going to be rare , but we are expecting cases.
” Now a 10-year-old clip of Theresa Tam is recirculating during which she comments on how the government could respond to people who refuse to take a mandatory vaccine after a virus outbreak .
The clip is taken from a 2010 National Film Board of Canada documentary entitled ‘ Outbreak : Anatomy of a Plague ’ .
“ I think the public has to know , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scenarios in case of an infectious disease outbreak , ” says Tam .
“ If there are people who are non-compliant , there are definitely laws and public health powers that can quarantine people in mandatory settings , ” she adds .
The narrator of the documentary then added some context as to what might happen next .
Around 80 different groups around the world are currently working on a vaccine for coronavirus , but experts have said there ’ s no guarantee it will even be succsessful .
( TLB ) published @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and written by Paul Joseph Watson with our appreciation for the coverage .
A message from Paul Joseph Watson : My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever .
It is CRUCIAL that you support me .
Please sign up for the free newsletter here .
Donate to me on SubscribeStar here .
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown .

Paul Joseph Watson
Canada’s current Chief Public Health Officer appeared in a recently resurfaced 2010 documentary in which she advocated using mandatory “tracking bracelets” for people who refuse to take a vaccine after a virus outbreak.
Theresa Tam (Pictured here) has become one of the faces of Canada’s response to coronavirus, appearing in public service announcements encouraging social distancing.
On 23 April, she was was appointed by Justin Trudeau to be a member of the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force, despite having previously asserted that there was “no reason to be overly concerned” about coronavirus back in January.
As late as January 29, she told Canadians, “It’s going to be rare, but we are expecting cases.”
Now a 10-year-old clip of Theresa Tam is recirculating during which she comments on how the government could respond to people who refuse to take a mandatory vaccine after a virus outbreak.
The clip is taken from a 2010 National Film Board of Canada documentary entitled ‘Outbreak: Anatomy of a Plague’.
Clip of Theresa Tam from a 2010 documentary: “You could track people, put bracelets on their arms.” “Police checkpoints are set up.. Everyone leaving the city is required to show proof of vaccination. Those who refuse to cooperate ARE TAKEN AWAY TO TEMPORARY DETENTION CENTRES.” pic.twitter.com/tSVOoJSkQe — ☨ Resurrection Europa 🍁 (@WolfishHead) April 27, 2020
“I think the public has to know, this is one of the worst case scenarios in case of an infectious disease outbreak,” says Tam.
“If there are people who are non-compliant, there are definitely laws and public health powers that can quarantine people in mandatory settings,” she adds.
“It’s potential you could track people, put bracelets on their arms, have police and other set ups to ensure quarantine is undertaken,” says Tam, adding that it was worth “taking the heat” of “people thinking you might be overreactionary.”
The narrator of the documentary then added some context as to what might happen next.
“Police checkpoints are set up on all the bridges. Everyone leaving the city is required to show proof of vaccination. Those who refuse to cooperate are taken away to temporary detention centers.”
Around 80 different groups around the world are currently working on a vaccine for coronavirus, but experts have said there’s no guarantee it will even be succsessful.
_________
Video added by (TLB)
View the complete documentary ‘Outbreak: Anatomy of a Plague’ here…
*********
(TLB) published this article from Summit News as compiled and written by Paul Joseph Watson with our appreciation for the coverage.
Pictorial content edited by (TLB)
A message from Paul Joseph Watson: My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me. Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here. Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-01--Assoc of Amer Physicians Says ‘Trump-Touted’ Drug Has 90% Chance Of Helping [Video]

( TLB ) Editor : President Trump Touted Hydroxychloroquine and the MSM , Gates & Co. , CDC and Big Rx said… no , no , no… We need a Vaccine .
Truth Talk and Money Talk , are two different languages .
Hydroxychloroquine Has about 90 Percent Chance of Helping COVID-19 Patients The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons In a letter to Gov .
Doug Ducey of Arizona , the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons ( AAPS ) presents a frequently updated table of studies that report results of treating COVID-19 with the anti-malaria drugs chloroquine ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Plaquenil® ) .
To date , the total number of reported patients treated with HCQ , with or without zinc and the widely used antibiotic azithromycin , is 2,333 , writes AAPS , in observational data from China , France , South Korea , Algeria , and the U.S. Of these , 2,137 or 91.6 percent improved clinically .
There were 63 deaths , all but 11 in a single retrospective report from the Veterans Administration where the patients were severely ill .
The antiviral properties of these drugs have been studied since @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , they hinder viral entry into cells and inhibit replication .
They may also prevent overreaction by the immune system , which causes the cytokine storm responsible for much of the damage in severe cases , explains AAPS .
HCQ is often very helpful in treating autoimmune diseases such as lupus and rheumatoid arthritis .
Additional benefits shown in some studies , AAPS states , is to decrease the number of days when a patient is contagious , reduce the need for ventilators , and shorten the time to clinical recovery .
Peer-reviewed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , 2020 , provide clear and convincing evidence that HCQ may be beneficial in COVID-19 , especially when used early , states AAPS .
Unfortunately , although it is perfectly legal to prescribe drugs for new indications not on the label , the Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) has recommended that CQ and HCQ should be used for COVID-19 only in hospitalized patients in the setting of a clinical study if available .
Most states are making it difficult for physicians to prescribe or pharmacists to dispense these medications .
As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , “ Many nations , including Turkey and India , are protecting medical workers and contacts of infected persons prophylactically .
According to worldometers.info , deaths per million persons from COVID-19 as of Apr 27 are 167 in the U.S. , 33 in Turkey , and 0.6 in India.
” After Morocco and Algeria began using HCQ , a trend break and sharp reduction in their COVID-19 case fatality rate occurred .
Vaccines and results of randomized double-blind controlled trials of new drugs are at best months away .
But patients are dying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would be available except for government restrictions , AAPS states .
Watch… The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons ( AAPS ) has represented physicians of all specialties in all states since 1943 .
The AAPS motto is omnia pro aegroto , meaning everything for the patient .
( TLB ) published this article by The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons , with our sincere gratitude for sharing this perspective .
COVID-19 : When We Can No Longer Trust … Those We Are Conditioned To Trust !
The Liberty Beacon Project is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ must request permission from the copyright owner .

(TLB) Editor: President Trump Touted Hydroxychloroquine and the MSM, Gates & Co.,CDC and Big Rx said… no, no, no… We need a Vaccine. Truth Talk and Money Talk, are two different languages.
Hydroxychloroquine Has about 90 Percent Chance of Helping COVID-19 Patients
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons
In a letter to Gov. Doug Ducey of Arizona, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) presents a frequently updated table of studies that report results of treating COVID-19 with the anti-malaria drugs chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ, Plaquenil®).
To date, the total number of reported patients treated with HCQ, with or without zinc and the widely used antibiotic azithromycin, is 2,333, writes AAPS, in observational data from China, France, South Korea, Algeria, and the U.S. Of these, 2,137 or 91.6 percent improved clinically. There were 63 deaths, all but 11 in a single retrospective report from the Veterans Administration where the patients were severely ill.
The antiviral properties of these drugs have been studied since 2003. Particularly when combined with zinc, they hinder viral entry into cells and inhibit replication. They may also prevent overreaction by the immune system, which causes the cytokine storm responsible for much of the damage in severe cases, explains AAPS. HCQ is often very helpful in treating autoimmune diseases such as lupus and rheumatoid arthritis.
Additional benefits shown in some studies, AAPS states, is to decrease the number of days when a patient is contagious, reduce the need for ventilators, and shorten the time to clinical recovery.
Peer-reviewed studies published from January through April 20, 2020, provide clear and convincing evidence that HCQ may be beneficial in COVID-19, especially when used early, states AAPS. Unfortunately, although it is perfectly legal to prescribe drugs for new indications not on the label, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recommended that CQ and HCQ should be used for COVID-19 only in hospitalized patients in the setting of a clinical study if available. Most states are making it difficult for physicians to prescribe or pharmacists to dispense these medications.
As the letter to Gov. Ducey notes, “Many nations, including Turkey and India, are protecting medical workers and contacts of infected persons prophylactically. According to worldometers.info, deaths per million persons from COVID-19 as of Apr 27 are 167 in the U.S., 33 in Turkey, and 0.6 in India.”
After Morocco and Algeria began using HCQ, a trend break and sharp reduction in their COVID-19 case fatality rate occurred.
Vaccines and results of randomized double-blind controlled trials of new drugs are at best months away. But patients are dying now, while affordable, long-used drugs would be available except for government restrictions, AAPS states. Watch…
And More…
_________
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) has represented physicians of all specialties in all states since 1943. The AAPS motto is omnia pro aegroto, meaning everything for the patient.
*********
(TLB) published this article by The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, with our sincere gratitude for sharing this perspective.
Related from The Liberty Beacon:
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-01--Why Are More Younger Adults Developing Alzheimer’s & Dementia?

Why Are More Younger Adults Developing Alzheimer ’ s & Dementia ?
Written & Contributed to TLB by : The Children ’ s Health Defense Team In late February , Blue Cross Blue Shield ( BCBS ) released a disturbing report describing the growing number of younger American adults diagnosed with early-onset dementia and Alzheimer ’ s disease ( AD ) .
Analyzing the four-year period from 2013-2017 , BCBS reported a 200 % increase in diagnosed dementia and AD among commercially insured adults from ages 30 to 64 .
As of 2017 , approximately 15 % of the insured @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two diagnoses were in their thirties or early to mid-forties .
The BCBS results reinforce findings from previous studies .
In 2014 , UK researchers reported that the number of under-65 individuals developing dementia was “ double what was previously thought.
” The next year , researchers looking at twenty-year dementia trends in the U.S. and other Western nations reported that dementias were starting “ a decade earlier than they used to.
” The downward creep of various types of dementia into younger age groups gives new meaning to the decades-old slogan popularized @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ a mind is a terrible thing to waste.
” With initial symptoms that may include “ depression , behavioural change , neurological disorders , systemic disorders and mild cognitive impairment , ” early-onset dementia can force individuals into early retirement and financial hardship—or worse .
An Irish study published in 2019 found that people with young-onset dementia “ most commonly die from complications of dementia ” versus other illnesses , even though nearly nine in ten also have at least one comorbid disease .
BCBS puts it this way : Younger adults @ @ @ @ @ @ @ living at just 63 % of optimal health—leading to about 11 years of healthy life lost.
” Not normal and ( mostly ) not genetic The Mayo Clinic notes that while age is a risk factor , dementia is not “ a normal part of aging.
” This observation is all the more pertinent when considering the individuals who develop dementia in their prime working-age years .
As with many other chronic conditions , researchers have tried to pin the blame for rising rates of dementia on genetics—largely without success .
Estimates suggest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ AD cases ( and perhaps 1 % of Alzheimer ’ s cases overall ) do have a genetic mutation that runs in families , the bulk of younger Alzheimer ’ s cases do not have a genetic explanation .
Moreover , AD is only a small piece of the broader dementia puzzle in those afflicted at younger ages .
Whereas the majority—well over half—of older adults ( 65 years ) with dementia have AD , Alzheimer ’ s accounts for only a third of younger dementia cases .
( Looked at a different @ @ @ @ @ @ @ % of all Americans with AD are under age 65 . )
More frequent forms of dementia in those under 65 include frontotemporal dementia—a nasty condition that produces loss of empathy , disinhibition , apathy , overeating and memory loss—and vascular dementia , which is linked to rampant chronic conditions such as obesity , diabetes and high blood pressure .
Interestingly , a growing body of research actually conceptualizes AD as type 3 diabetes or “ brain diabetes ” because of “ molecular and biochemical features that overlap ” with diabetes types 1 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ then what ?
A study published in late 2019 assessed nongenetic risk factors for two types of young-onset dementia , considering a range of risks related to demographics , lifestyle and medical history .
The researchers found that nongenetic factorsin combination conferred more risk than any single factor , with each additional exposure increasing the risk of midlife dementia by 28 % .
The authors concluded that some individuals with young-onset dementia “ experience a lifetime of risk exposure starting from early in life.
” Still pushing the genetics theme , some researchers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be genetic—such as mitochondrial disorders , enzyme-related disorders and abnormalities of the myelin sheath—sometimes crop up in delayed fashion and manifest as young-onset dementia in adulthood .
Of note , other studies have linked abnormal myelin development to “ psychopathology ” in adolescents and young adults .
For some researchers , the strong link between neurodegenerative diseases and dementia points to environmental exposures rather than genetics as likely culprits .
In a twenty-year study ( 1989-2010 ) of dementia trends in 55-74 year-old adults across 21 developed countries , the U.S. experienced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in total neurological deaths—defined as “ Alzheimer and other dementias ” plus “ nervous disease ” deaths .
The U.S. went from a ranking of 17th in 1989 to having the second highest rate of 55-74 year-old dementia by 2010 .
To explain their dramatic results in both the U.S. and other countries , the lead author pointed a finger at environmental factors : Some investigators cite traumatic brain injuries ( TBIs ) —increasingly common in children and adolescents—as another important contributor to early-onset dementia .
In a 2014 paper , Dr. Stephanie @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Morley coined the term “ diminished brain resilience syndrome ” to describe “ a modern day neurological pathway of increased susceptibility to mild brain trauma , concussion , and downstream neurodegeneration.
” The two placed the blame for the heightened vulnerability of young brains on multiple environmental and lifestyle factors , including exposure to glyphosate .
In a 2008 JAMA Neurology study of dementia occurring in individuals under age 45—whose average age of onset was 34.7 years—the researchers linked 21 % of cases to autoimmune or inflammatory causes , including lupus , autoimmune @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Cognitive symptoms , including dementia , are some of the oldest recognized signs of MS—a condition that involves demyelination—with full dementia present in roughly one in five MS patients .
In the just-mentioned 2008 study in JAMA Neurology , 19 % of dementia cases in younger patients were of “ unknown etiology , despite exhaustive evaluation ” that sometimes included brain biopsy .
The researchers made no mention of the known neurotoxin aluminum as a potential contributor—a surprising omission given the 2001 publication of the book Aluminium and Alzheimer ’ s Disease @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , edited by UK Professor Christopher Exley , one of the world ’ s foremost aluminum experts .
For decades , Exley and colleagues have tried to shine a spotlight on the role of aluminum in Alzheimer ’ s disease in the face of massive industry pushback and denials .
The latest effort by Professor Exley and his group presents findings that are “ unequivocal in their confirmation of a role for aluminium in some if not all Alzheimer ’ s disease.
” The study found unprecedentedly high levels of aluminum in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the type of AD associated with genetic mutations ( familial AD ) .
Exley speculates that these genetic predispositions may also predispose individuals to accumulate high levels of brain aluminum “ at a much younger age.
” In other work , Exley has suggested that aluminum may also act as a “ catalyst ” for earlier-onset AD in people “ without concomitant predispositions , genetic or otherwise , ” and he proposes viewing AD “ as an acute response to chronic intoxication by aluminum.
” Professor Exley has also reported on the extraordinarily @ @ @ @ @ @ @ brain tissue .
Many of the conditions and exposures correlated with early-onset dementia—diabetes , obesity , autoimmune illness , traumatic brain injury , glyphosate poisoning and aluminum intoxication via vaccines—are occurring at epidemic levels in our children .
Electromagnetic fields ( EMFs ) are also a growing concern .
The scientific literature already links occupational EMF exposure to early-onset dementia .
EMF safety advocates have been raising questions for years about the link between cell phones and dementia at younger ages , particularly because of cell phones ’ effects on blood-brain barrier permeability @ @ @ @ @ @ @ significance for the developing brains of our cell-phone-enamored and wireless-saturated children .
Alzheimer ’ s disease alone is already America ’ s most expensive disease , costing more than either heart disease or cancer .
If we do not turn the chronic disease epidemics around and diminish or eliminate children ’ s toxic exposures , chances are that the next study of early-onset dementia will present even more troubling results—and there will be fewer adults with the brain power to understand them .

Why Are More Younger Adults Developing Alzheimer’s & Dementia?
Written & Contributed to TLB by: The Children’s Health Defense Team
In late February, Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) released a disturbing report describing the growing number of younger American adults diagnosed with early-onset dementia and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Analyzing the four-year period from 2013-2017, BCBS reported a 200% increase in diagnosed dementia and AD among commercially insured adults from ages 30 to 64. As of 2017, approximately 15% of the insured younger Americans who received one of the two diagnoses were in their thirties or early to mid-forties.
The BCBS results reinforce findings from previous studies. In 2014, UK researchers reported that the number of under-65 individuals developing dementia was “double what was previously thought.” The next year, researchers looking at twenty-year dementia trends in the U.S. and other Western nations reported that dementias were starting “a decade earlier than they used to.”
The downward creep of various types of dementia into younger age groups gives new meaning to the decades-old slogan popularized by the United Negro College Fund that “a mind is a terrible thing to waste.” With initial symptoms that may include “depression, behavioural change, neurological disorders, systemic disorders and mild cognitive impairment,” early-onset dementia can force individuals into early retirement and financial hardship—or worse. An Irish study published in 2019 found that people with young-onset dementia “most commonly die from complications of dementia” versus other illnesses, even though nearly nine in ten also have at least one comorbid disease. BCBS puts it this way: Younger adults living with dementia or AD “are living at just 63% of optimal health—leading to about 11 years of healthy life lost.”
Estimates suggest that while around 11% of young-onset AD cases (and perhaps 1% of Alzheimer’s cases overall) do have a genetic mutation that runs in families, the bulk of younger Alzheimer’s cases do not have a genetic explanation. Estimates suggest that while around 11% of young-onset AD cases (and perhaps 1% of Alzheimer’s cases overall) do have a genetic mutation that runs in families, the bulk of younger Alzheimer’s cases do not have a genetic explanation.
Not normal and (mostly) not genetic
The Mayo Clinic notes that while age is a risk factor, dementia is not “a normal part of aging.” This observation is all the more pertinent when considering the individuals who develop dementia in their prime working-age years. As with many other chronic conditions, researchers have tried to pin the blame for rising rates of dementia on genetics—largely without success. Estimates suggest that while around 11% of young-onset AD cases (and perhaps 1% of Alzheimer’s cases overall) do have a genetic mutation that runs in families, the bulk of younger Alzheimer’s cases do not have a genetic explanation.
Moreover, AD is only a small piece of the broader dementia puzzle in those afflicted at younger ages. Whereas the majority—well over half—of older adults ( > 65 years) with dementia have AD, Alzheimer’s accounts for only a third of younger dementia cases. (Looked at a different way, just 5% to 6% of all Americans with AD are under age 65.) More frequent forms of dementia in those under 65 include frontotemporal dementia—a nasty condition that produces loss of empathy, disinhibition, apathy, overeating and memory loss—and vascular dementia, which is linked to rampant chronic conditions such as obesity, diabetes and high blood pressure. Interestingly, a growing body of research actually conceptualizes AD as type 3 diabetes or “brain diabetes” because of “molecular and biochemical features that overlap” with diabetes types 1 and 2.
For some researchers, the strong link between neurodegenerative diseases and dementia points to environmental exposures rather than genetics as likely culprits. For some researchers, the strong link between neurodegenerative diseases and dementia points to environmental exposures rather than genetics as likely culprits.
If not genetics, then what?
A study published in late 2019 assessed nongenetic risk factors for two types of young-onset dementia, considering a range of risks related to demographics, lifestyle and medical history. The researchers found that nongenetic factorsin combination conferred more risk than any single factor, with each additional exposure increasing the risk of midlife dementia by 28%. The authors concluded that some individuals with young-onset dementia “experience a lifetime of risk exposure starting from early in life.”
Still pushing the genetics theme, some researchers have suggested that childhood neurodegenerative conditions presumed to be genetic—such as mitochondrial disorders, enzyme-related disorders and abnormalities of the myelin sheath—sometimes crop up in delayed fashion and manifest as young-onset dementia in adulthood. Of note, other studies have linked abnormal myelin development to “psychopathology” in adolescents and young adults.
For some researchers, the strong link between neurodegenerative diseases and dementia points to environmental exposures rather than genetics as likely culprits. In a twenty-year study (1989-2010) of dementia trends in 55-74 year-old adults across 21 developed countries, the U.S. experienced the biggest increase (82%) in total neurological deaths—defined as “Alzheimer and other dementias” plus “nervous disease” deaths. The U.S. went from a ranking of 17th in 1989 to having the second highest rate of 55-74 year-old dementia by 2010. To explain their dramatic results in both the U.S. and other countries, the lead author pointed a finger at environmental factors:
The rate of increase in such a short time suggests a silent or even a “hidden” epidemic, in which environmental factors must play a major part, not just aging. . . . [T]he changes in human morbidity, including neurological disease is [sic] remarkable and points to environmental influences. [. . .] The environmental changes in the last 20 years have seen increases in the human environment of petro-chemicals—air transport, quadrupling of motor vehicles, insecticides and rises in background electro-magnetic-field, and so on.
Some investigators cite traumatic brain injuries (TBIs)—increasingly common in children and adolescents—as another important contributor to early-onset dementia. In a 2014 paper, Dr. Stephanie Seneff of MIT and lead author Wendy Morley coined the term “diminished brain resilience syndrome” to describe “a modern day neurological pathway of increased susceptibility to mild brain trauma, concussion, and downstream neurodegeneration.” The two placed the blame for the heightened vulnerability of young brains on multiple environmental and lifestyle factors, including exposure to glyphosate.
In a 2008 JAMA Neurology study of dementia occurring in individuals under age 45—whose average age of onset was 34.7 years—the researchers linked 21% of cases to autoimmune or inflammatory causes, including lupus, autoimmune encephalopathy and multiple sclerosis (MS). Cognitive symptoms, including dementia, are some of the oldest recognized signs of MS—a condition that involves demyelination—with full dementia present in roughly one in five MS patients.
… presents findings that are unequivocal in their confirmation of a role for aluminium in some if not all Alzheimer’s disease. … presents findings that are unequivocal in their confirmation of a role for aluminium in some if not all Alzheimer’s disease.
Let’s not forget aluminum
In the just-mentioned 2008 study in JAMA Neurology, 19% of dementia cases in younger patients were of “unknown etiology, despite exhaustive evaluation” that sometimes included brain biopsy. The researchers made no mention of the known neurotoxin aluminum as a potential contributor—a surprising omission given the 2001 publication of the book Aluminium and Alzheimer’s Disease: The Science that Describes the Link, edited by UK Professor Christopher Exley, one of the world’s foremost aluminum experts. For decades, Exley and colleagues have tried to shine a spotlight on the role of aluminum in Alzheimer’s disease in the face of massive industry pushback and denials.
The latest effort by Professor Exley and his group presents findings that are “unequivocal in their confirmation of a role for aluminium in some if not all Alzheimer’s disease.” The study found unprecedentedly high levels of aluminum in the brain tissue of persons who died with the type of AD associated with genetic mutations (familial AD). Exley speculates that these genetic predispositions may also predispose individuals to accumulate high levels of brain aluminum “at a much younger age.” In other work, Exley has suggested that aluminum may also act as a “catalyst” for earlier-onset AD in people “without concomitant predispositions, genetic or otherwise,” and he proposes viewing AD “as an acute response to chronic intoxication by aluminum.” Professor Exley has also reported on the extraordinarily high levels of aluminum found in autism brain tissue.
Electromagnetic field (EMF) safety advocates have been raising questions for years about the link between cell phones and dementia at younger ages … Electromagnetic field (EMF) safety advocates have been raising questions for years about the link between cell phones and dementia at younger ages …
Protecting children’s bodies—and minds
Many of the conditions and exposures correlated with early-onset dementia—diabetes, obesity, autoimmune illness, traumatic brain injury, glyphosate poisoning and aluminum intoxication via vaccines—are occurring at epidemic levels in our children. Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) are also a growing concern. The scientific literature already links occupational EMF exposure to early-onset dementia. EMF safety advocates have been raising questions for years about the link between cell phones and dementia at younger ages, particularly because of cell phones’ effects on blood-brain barrier permeability. Clearly, these questions have great significance for the developing brains of our cell-phone-enamored and wireless-saturated children.
Alzheimer’s disease alone is already America’s most expensive disease, costing more than either heart disease or cancer. If we do not turn the chronic disease epidemics around and diminish or eliminate children’s toxic exposures, chances are that the next study of early-onset dementia will present even more troubling results—and there will be fewer adults with the brain power to understand them.
••••
TLB Editors Note: This is World Mercury Project on steroids! TLB highly recommends you click on the image below, visit this great website, and do whatever you can to help see this vital forum succeed … for the sake of our children !!! Please take the time to Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.
••••
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-01--Residents up in arms after Michigan governor extends emergency powers [Video]

Lawmakers and residents have lashed out at Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer ’ s decision to prolong a state of emergency over the coronavirus pandemic , ignoring a vote in the legislature to let the draconian measure expire .
Whitmer signed three new executive orders on Thursday , decrees which she said were necessary in order to “ continue fighting Covid-19 and save lives.
” The move came after both the state house and the state senate voted against extending the governor ’ s previous state of emergency order , which was set to expire at midnight .
The new executive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , including the ability to impose curfews , as the state battles to contain coronavirus .
The powers are set to expire on May 28 , at which point the governor will evaluate “ the continuing need ” for the order .
Whitmer has used executive orders as a legal means to enforce the state ’ s stay-at-home policy , which was recently extended until mid-May .
Rep. Lee Chatfield , speaker of the Michigan House , expressed his disappointment with Whitmer ’ s unilateral action , arguing that the legislature believed in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a notion which he alleged the governor had rejected .
Whitmer ’ s new orders sparked fury among many residents .
A popular Facebook group , Michiganders Against Excessive Quarantine , was flooded by posts from outraged citizens .
Whitmer has maintained that the Republican-controlled legislature is not taking the health crisis seriously , stressing that the executive orders are necessary because the state is “ not out of the woods yet.
” The controversial lockdown measures , as well as the executive orders , have polarized Michigan .
Protesters , some carrying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ descended on the state capitol in Lansing on Thursday to express their opposition to the policies .
Democrats slammed the rally as a dangerous stunt pulled by white nationalists .
( TLB ) published this article from RT-USA News with our appreciation for the coverage and availability .

Lawmakers and residents have lashed out at Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s decision to prolong a state of emergency over the coronavirus pandemic, ignoring a vote in the legislature to let the draconian measure expire.
Whitmer signed three new executive orders on Thursday, decrees which she said were necessary in order to “continue fighting Covid-19 and save lives.”
The move came after both the state house and the state senate voted against extending the governor’s previous state of emergency order, which was set to expire at midnight.
The new executive orders give Whitmer broad and far-reaching powers, including the ability to impose curfews, as the state battles to contain coronavirus. The powers are set to expire on May 28, at which point the governor will evaluate “the continuing need” for the order. Whitmer has used executive orders as a legal means to enforce the state’s stay-at-home policy, which was recently extended until mid-May.
Rep. Lee Chatfield, speaker of the Michigan House, expressed his disappointment with Whitmer’s unilateral action, arguing that the legislature believed in “upholding the democratic process” – a notion which he alleged the governor had rejected.
Today, we offered our hand of partnership to the governor. No politics. We’re all in this together and we should all work together. We believe upholding the democratic process is best for MI people. She just said no. Very disappointing. #InThisTogether https://t.co/thExZnZSsg — Lee Chatfield (@LeeChatfield) May 1, 2020
Another Michigan lawmaker, Rep. Michele Hoitenga, argued that “no person should have the level of unbridled power to dictate the movement of individuals,” adding that the state of emergency threatens rights which are “preeminent to us as Americans and as people.”
Whitmer’s new orders sparked fury among many residents. A popular Facebook group, Michiganders Against Excessive Quarantine, was flooded by posts from outraged citizens.
“So it appears we have a straight up unilateral dictator on our hands in Michigan,”read one comment.
Whitmer has maintained that the Republican-controlled legislature is not taking the health crisis seriously, stressing that the executive orders are necessary because the state is “not out of the woods yet.”
The controversial lockdown measures, as well as the executive orders, have polarized Michigan. Protesters, some carrying weapons [Legal in Michigan], descended on the state capitol in Lansing on Thursday to express their opposition to the policies. Democrats slammed the rally as a dangerous stunt pulled by white nationalists.
*********
(TLB) published this article from RT-USA News with our appreciation for the coverage and availability.
Emphasis added by (TLB)
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-01--Rutgers Prof Blames White Conservatives For Using Virus To Kill Black People

“ A Gross Necropolitical Calculation ” : Rutgers Prof Blames White Conservatives For Using Virus To Kill Black People Brittney Cooper , an associate professor in the Department of Women ’ s , Gender and Sexuality Studies at Rutgers University , is doubling down on her prior public comments denouncing Trump supporters and alleging a conspiracy to kill black people .
She notably has invoked her tenure status with the latest tweet attacks : “ I have tenure .
Rutgers won ’ t be firing me for tweets.
” As many of you know , I have long taken the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of faculty on social media and public comments .
However , schools have been less than consistent in punishing or investigating faculty based on the content of their views .
Cooper declaring “ F— each and every Trump supporter ” obviously would include many students in the university .
She blames “ white depravity ” and claims “ when whiteness has a death wish , we are all in for a serious problem.
” As previously discussed , it is doubtful that these same attacks directed against African-Americans or other groups would be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ week , Cooper tweeted “ F— each and every Trump supporter .
You absolutely did this .
You are to blame ” for the pandemic .
She brushed off past criticism and declared “ I said what I meant .
And I curse cuz I ’ m grown .
I have tenure .
Rutgers won ’ t be firing me for tweets.
” In another post , Cooper claimed Trump supporters ’ loyalty to the president impaired their judgment about the outbreak : “ They are literally willing to die from this clusterf—ed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other than him [ Trump ] would have been a better president .
And when whiteness has a death wish , we are all in for a serious problem.
” She has previously denounced “ white depravity.
” As we have previously discussed ( including a story involving an Oregon professor ) , there remains an uncertain line in what language is protected for teachers in their private lives .
The incident also raises what some faculty have complained is a double or at least uncertain standard .
We have previously discussed controversies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ University , where there have been criticism of such a double standard , even in the face of criminal conduct .
There were also such an incident at the University of London involving Bahar Mustafa as well as one involving a University of Pennsylvania professor .
Some intolerant statements against students are deemed free speech while others are deemed hate speech or the basis for university action .
There is a lack of consistency or uniformity in these actions which turn on the specific groups left aggrieved by out-of-school comments .
There is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tearing down fliers and stopping the speech of conservatives .
Indeed , even faculty who assaulted pro-life advocates was supported by faculty and lionized for her activism .
Again , I believe Cooper ’ s speech should be protected but the recognition of such free speech values seems to often exclude faculty and students from opposing political or social perspectives .
The protection of such speech continues to depend on its content in determining if actions will be taken by the university .
Professor Jonathan Turley is a nationally recognized legal scholar who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ constitutional law to legal theory to tort law .
He has written over three dozen academic articles that have appeared in a variety of leading law journals at Cornell , Duke , Georgetown , Harvard , Northwestern , University of Chicago , and other schools .
After a stint at Tulane Law School , Professor Turley joined the George Washington faculty in 1990 and , in 1998 , was given the prestigious Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law , the youngest chaired professor in the school ’ s history .
In addition to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ served as counsel in some of the most notable cases in the last two decades including the representation of whistleblowers , military personnel , judges , members of Congress , and a wide range of other clients .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

“A Gross Necropolitical Calculation”: Rutgers Prof Blames White Conservatives For Using Virus To Kill Black People
JONATHAN TURLEY
Brittney Cooper, an associate professor in the Department of Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Studies at Rutgers University, is doubling down on her prior public comments denouncing Trump supporters and alleging a conspiracy to kill black people. She notably has invoked her tenure status with the latest tweet attacks: “I have tenure. Rutgers won’t be firing me for tweets.” As many of you know, I have long taken the same position on the free speech rights of faculty on social media and public comments. However, schools have been less than consistent in punishing or investigating faculty based on the content of their views. Cooper declaring “F— each and every Trump supporter” obviously would include many students in the university. She blames “white depravity” and claims “when whiteness has a death wish, we are all in for a serious problem.” As previously discussed, it is doubtful that these same attacks directed against African-Americans or other groups would be treated in the same fashion.
This week, Cooper tweeted “F— each and every Trump supporter. You absolutely did this. You are to blame” for the pandemic. She brushed off past criticism and declared “I said what I meant. And I curse cuz I’m grown. I have tenure. Rutgers won’t be firing me for tweets.”
In another post, Cooper claimed Trump supporters’ loyalty to the president impaired their judgment about the outbreak: “They are literally willing to die from this clusterf—ed COVID response rather than admit absolutely anybody other than him [Trump] would have been a better president. And when whiteness has a death wish, we are all in for a serious problem.” She has previously denounced “white depravity.”
As we have previously discussed (including a story involving an Oregon professor), there remains an uncertain line in what language is protected for teachers in their private lives. The incident also raises what some faculty have complained is a double or at least uncertain standard. We have previously discussed controversies at the University of California and Boston University, where there have been criticism of such a double standard, even in the face of criminal conduct. There were also such an incident at the University of London involving Bahar Mustafa as well as one involving a University of Pennsylvania professor. Some intolerant statements against students are deemed free speech while others are deemed hate speech or the basis for university action. There is a lack of consistency or uniformity in these actions which turn on the specific groups left aggrieved by out-of-school comments. There is also a tolerance of faculty and students tearing down fliers and stopping the speech of conservatives. Indeed, even faculty who assaulted pro-life advocates was supported by faculty and lionized for her activism.
Again, I believe Cooper’s speech should be protected but the recognition of such free speech values seems to often exclude faculty and students from opposing political or social perspectives. The protection of such speech continues to depend on its content in determining if actions will be taken by the university.
*********
(TLB) published this article from J
Bio
Professor Jonathan Turley is a nationally recognized legal scholar who has written extensively in areas ranging from constitutional law to legal theory to tort law. He has written over three dozen academic articles that have appeared in a variety of leading law journals at Cornell, Duke, Georgetown, Harvard, Northwestern, University of Chicago, and other schools.
After a stint at Tulane Law School, Professor Turley joined the George Washington faculty in 1990 and, in 1998, was given the prestigious Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law, the youngest chaired professor in the school’s history. In addition to his extensive publications, Professor Turley has served as counsel in some of the most notable cases in the last two decades including the representation of whistleblowers, military personnel, judges, members of Congress, and a wide range of other clients.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.