thelibertybeacon--2020-10-06--The Ministry of Terror

The Ministry of Terror

It is important we understand exactly how the government is fiddling the “ new cases ” stats so as to create statistics that make it look like we have an epidemic on our hands .
There is a very good detailed explanation of how it is being done here , provided by Dr Mike Yeadon , who is the former CSO and VP , Allergy and Respiratory Research Head with Pfizer Global R & D and co-Founder of Ziarco Pharma Ltd .
The article is very thorough but it takes quite a bit of getting your head around , so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , in-a-nutshell explanation for those with busy lives who do not necessarily have the time to spend on it .
• First off , the misrepresentation requires steering the public ’ s attention away from four important facts .
• The first is that , per the mortality stats and so forth , this bug is comparable to seasonal flu .
• Secondly , the outbreak ran its course , as these outbreaks do , quite some time ago .
In so doing , it followed the pattern of similar outbreaks that have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ • Thirdly it is necessary to ignore the fact that the PCR test in wide use is inaccurate and returns false positives and just pretend that all positives are “ cases ” even when they have no symptoms .
• Fourthly , ignore the fact that the ONS has already established -through more accurate but painstaking methodology than the mass-use PCR testing – that the COVID19 bug is actually present in roughly 1 in 1000 people .
In other words , take any random group of 10000 people and you ’ ll find @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bug .
That doesn ’ t necessarily mean they have a serious case of it because how serious it is depends on age and background health and so forth .
But roughly 10 will have it and for one or two of them it is going to be serious .
The main weapon in the arsenal for “ detecting ” the spread of the virus is the PCR test .
The PCR test isn ’ t very accurate .
How inaccurate ?
Opinions vary .
Experts such as Dr Yeadon contend it is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at all .
The Health Secretary says that it returns false positives in about 1 % of people tested .
This doesn ’ t sound a lot but therein lies the deceit .
It is very likely the Health Secretary is understating the level of inaccuracy ( indeed the Foreign Secretary recently let slip that the unreliability of the test is MUCH MUCH higher than what the Hancock tells us ) but for the sake of argument let us be kind to Hancock and assume that the test gives a false positive in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That means that in any random group of 10000 people tested roughly 100 people will show “ positive ” when they do not actually have the virus .
At the same time , about 10 people who actually do have the virus will , correctly , test positive .
So one day , 10 000 tests are done and 110 people test positive ( 10 who actually do have it and 100 who don ’ t have it ) .
So the government , knowing full well the level of inaccuracy it is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ new cases were found today !
” While we are at it , let ’ s point out too that it is inconceivable that the Prime Minister does not know this , the government ’ s experts do not know this and that every MP in the Parliament does not know this .
To believe that they do not know this is to believe they are capable of a level of incompetence utterly unacceptable – and indeed dangerous – in people who are entrusted by the rest of us with running the ruddy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , returning to our stats , the true number of cases is ten but the number reported by the government is 110 : the stats make a flu-like bug appear roughly eleven times more infectious than it actually is .
That is a 91 % inaccuracy rate !
There is another destructive ramification of all this dedicated lying and misrepresentation that is worth mentioning .
Imagine you have been to a restaurant and given your details per the so-called track-and-trace system .
One of the restaurant customers is later tested and tests positive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and told to self isolate for 2 weeks .
But the chances are greater than 10 to one that the person who tested positive doesn ’ t actually have the bug .
So you wind up being self isolated with all the loss of income and production that involves because you ate in the same restaurant as someone who was in fact perfectly healthy !
But remember , all this is based on a generous false positive rate of just 1 % .
The Foreign Secretary has suggested the test may be about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is going to lie to us , they should at least get their story straight .
Well , let ’ s be generous again and imagine a false positive rate of 10 % .
In that case : 10000 people tested , 10 people who actually have the bug and around 1000 people who test positive but don ’ t actually have it .
10 accurate out of 1010 inaccurate , makes it a less than 1 % accuracy rate .
The government luridly announces 1,010 “ new cases found ” , of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and a thousand false – and an epidemic that exists only in government stats and not in the real world .
We are being conned on a massive scale by criminals who think it is perfectly all right to lie through their teeth to and cynically terrorise the British people .
We must demand that the perpetrators and their accomplices , proxies and collaborators are brought to trial .
Nobody should be allowed to get away with bringing that amount of terror and outright harm to the nation .
Kieron McFadden writes exclusively @ @ @ @ @ @ @ project .
He does not think highly of Matt Hancock This article was first featured on UK Reloaded The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

by Kieron McFadden
It is important we understand exactly how the government is fiddling the “new cases” stats so as to create statistics that make it look like we have an epidemic on our hands.
There is a very good detailed explanation of how it is being done here, provided by Dr Mike Yeadon, who is the former CSO and VP, Allergy and Respiratory Research Head with Pfizer Global R&D and co-Founder of Ziarco Pharma Ltd.
The article is very thorough but it takes quite a bit of getting your head around, so let me try to provide a brief, in-a-nutshell explanation for those with busy lives who do not necessarily have the time to spend on it.
First off, the misrepresentation requires steering the public’s attention away from four important facts.
The first is that, per the mortality stats and so forth, this bug is comparable to seasonal flu.
Secondly, the outbreak ran its course, as these outbreaks do, quite some time ago. In so doing, it followed the pattern of similar outbreaks that have come and gone over the years.
Thirdly it is necessary to ignore the fact that the PCR test in wide use is inaccurate and returns false positives and just pretend that all positives are “cases” even when they have no symptoms.
Fourthly, ignore the fact that the ONS has already established -through more accurate but painstaking methodology than the mass-use PCR testing – that the COVID19 bug is actually present in roughly 1 in 1000 people. In other words, take any random group of 10000 people and you’ll find that about 10 of them have the bug. That doesn’t necessarily mean they have a serious case of it because how serious it is depends on age and background health and so forth. But roughly 10 will have it and for one or two of them it is going to be serious.
The main weapon in the arsenal for “detecting” the spread of the virus is the PCR test.
The PCR test isn’t very accurate. How inaccurate? Opinions vary. Experts such as Dr Yeadon contend it is so inaccurate it should not be used at all.
The Health Secretary says that it returns false positives in about 1% of people tested. This doesn’t sound a lot but therein lies the deceit.
It is very likely the Health Secretary is understating the level of inaccuracy (indeed the Foreign Secretary recently let slip that the unreliability of the test is MUCH MUCH higher than what the Hancock tells us) but for the sake of argument let us be kind to Hancock and assume that the test gives a false positive in one in a hundred people tested.
That means that in any random group of 10000 people tested roughly 100 people will show “positive” when they do not actually have the virus .
At the same time, about 10 people who actually do have the virus will, correctly, test positive.
So one day, 10 000 tests are done and 110 people test positive (10 who actually do have it and 100 who don’t have it).
So the government, knowing full well the level of inaccuracy it is ignoring, luridly proclaims that “110 new cases were found today!”
While we are at it, let’s point out too that it is inconceivable that the Prime Minister does not know this, the government’s experts do not know this and that every MP in the Parliament does not know this. To believe that they do not know this is to believe they are capable of a level of incompetence utterly unacceptable – and indeed dangerous – in people who are entrusted by the rest of us with running the ruddy country!
Be that as it may, returning to our stats, the true number of cases is ten but the number reported by the government is 110: the stats make a flu-like bug appear roughly eleven times more infectious than it actually is. That is a 91% inaccuracy rate!
There is another destructive ramification of all this dedicated lying and misrepresentation that is worth mentioning.
Imagine you have been to a restaurant and given your details per the so-called track-and-trace system. One of the restaurant customers is later tested and tests positive for COVID19. So you are contacted and told to self isolate for 2 weeks.
But the chances are greater than 10 to one that the person who tested positive doesn’t actually have the bug.
So you wind up being self isolated with all the loss of income and production that involves because you ate in the same restaurant as someone who was in fact perfectly healthy!
But remember, all this is based on a generous false positive rate of just 1%. The Foreign Secretary has suggested the test may be about 93% inaccurate. If the government is going to lie to us, they should at least get their story straight.
Well, let’s be generous again and imagine a false positive rate of 10%. In that case: 10000 people tested, 10 people who actually have the bug and around 1000 people who test positive but don’t actually have it. 10 accurate out of 1010 inaccurate, makes it a less than 1% accuracy rate.
The government luridly announces 1,010 “new cases found”, of which there are only 10 true cases and a thousand false – and an epidemic that exists only in government stats and not in the real world.
We are being conned on a massive scale by criminals who think it is perfectly all right to lie through their teeth to and cynically terrorise the British people.
We must demand that the perpetrators and their accomplices, proxies and collaborators are brought to trial.
Nobody should be allowed to get away with bringing that amount of terror and outright harm to the nation.
Kieron McFadden writes exclusively for UK Reloaded and the Liberty Beacon project.
He does not think highly of Matt Hancock
This article was first featured on UK Reloaded
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-10-07--Asking The Question That Nobody Dares To Ask Publicly

Asking The Question That Nobody Dares To Ask Publicly “ I always trust my gut , ” begins AmericanThinker.com ’ s Sally Zelikovsky , “ litigators and trial attorneys tend to do that.
” When things don ’ t make sense or add up but you don ’ t have a smoking gun , you start nosing around with questioning and investigating to see if your hunch pans out .
Zelikovsky notes that , obviously , she doesn ’ t have any proof that the recent COVID-19 infections of POTUS and FLOTUS , several Republican senators , and people working @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , are truly random events or something planned , but it doesn ’ t pass the “ random cluster of infections ” smell test .
Come on , admit it .
You are all thinking it , too .
I ’ m sure like me , you spent the weekend texting friends about your suspicions .
The virus appears to have targeted Republicans only and left Democrats unscathed .
Democrats are trying to characterize this as a Rose Garden or debate super spreader — even though plenty of Democrats and Biden supporters were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Republicans after the Amy Coney Barrett ceremony .
They argue that , as avid wearers of the mask , they are shielded from Republicans bearing COVID .
But if masks were ironclad , we ’ d all be immune .
People can still contract the disease in spite of masks , handwashing , and social distancing — which are only preventive measures that minimize risk .
It is odd that in a town as small as Washington , D.C. , only Republicans took the hit .
The timing is a second factor .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ announcement , the debate , and Comey ’ s flaccid testimony , and now we are full-blown into October — the final leg of the campaign .
We have Radcliffe ’ s damning evidence that Obama , Comey and Brennan were aware of Hillary Clinton ’ s intent to frame Trump of colluding with Russia and , suddenly , Andy McCabe can not do a Zoom appearance in the Senate under the pretext of fearing for his family ’ s safety from contracting COVID .
Schumer , on cue , demands the cancellation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ part of which can be done remotely to prevent COVID spread .
Moreover , Hidin ’ Biden comes out of seclusion and hops on more planes in the last few days flying to Michigan and Florida than he has flown for most of September when he made a only few local appearances in Delaware and Pennsylvania , flew to Cleveland for the debate , called lids on half the days in September , and did a post-debate lame train tour where he interacted with few supporters .
Yet Donald Trump who , up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ back-to-back rallies in battleground states with overwhelming support from adoring audiences in the thousands , is suddenly relegated to Biden-style videos , seclusion , and waving from cars .
This is like being in a cage for someone who is as gregarious and loves interacting with Americans as Trump .
One would think that Biden , at his age and with his vulnerabilities , would be even more cautious and reluctant to travel and interact with voters in the last weeks of the campaign — especially after a potentially close encounter with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it did to the President .
And yet , as soon as Trump is sidelined , Biden is hopping on planes without a care in the world .
Finally , there is the fact that the most protected man in the universe , who has insisted on serving and interacting with the people despite the pandemic , refused to hover in an isolated bunker and managed to escape infection for seven months , suddenly gets a direct hit… again , in the final weeks of his campaign .
Interrupting the one thing the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ succession of popular rallies .
We know the transmission could have resulted from a lapse in procedure , after all , those who protect and interact with the President are only human .
But in an administration where enemies are constantly undermining the President , it doesn ’ t strain an iota of credulity to wonder if those same nefarious forces didn ’ t weaponize the virus and directly expose the president to it or use someone like Hope Hicks as a COVID bullet .
They ’ ve tried to impeach and remove @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discredit him , undermine his accomplishments , embarrass and ridicule him ; they ’ ve wished him dead umpteen times ; they ’ ve relentlessly threatened his life ; and they ’ ve been clear they don ’ t care about his family or his health .
Why not use the virus further to their advantage ?
While his security detail is adept at thwarting plots involving cars , guns , planes , bombs , and other visible weapons , there are myriad ways a virus can find its way to our president @ @ @ @ @ @ @ after seven months , it did .
A month before the election as he was ramping up his very successful airport hangar rallies .
It ’ s too perfect to be mere happenstance .
With a little contact tracing and sleuthing , I wouldn ’ t be surprised if we find out this was an arrow in someone ’ s quiver and a doozy of an October surprise .
( TLB ) published this article from ZeroHedge as compiled and commented on by Tyler Durden .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and @ @ @ @ @ @

Asking The Question That Nobody Dares To Ask Publicly
…who targeted the president?
“I always trust my gut,” begins AmericanThinker.com’s Sally Zelikovsky, “litigators and trial attorneys tend to do that.”
When things don’t make sense or add up but you don’t have a smoking gun, you start nosing around with questioning and investigating to see if your hunch pans out.
President Trump at Walter Reed. Credit…Doug Mills/The New York Times
by Tyler Durden
Zelikovsky notes that, obviously, she doesn’t have any proof that the recent COVID-19 infections of POTUS and FLOTUS, several Republican senators, and people working on his campaign and in his administration, are truly random events or something planned, but it doesn’t pass the “random cluster of infections” smell test. Come on, admit it. You are all thinking it, too. I’m sure like me, you spent the weekend texting friends about your suspicions.
The virus appears to have targeted Republicans only and left Democrats unscathed.
Democrats are trying to characterize this as a Rose Garden or debate super spreader — even though plenty of Democrats and Biden supporters were at the debate and likely interacted with Republicans after the Amy Coney Barrett ceremony. They argue that, as avid wearers of the mask, they are shielded from Republicans bearing COVID. But if masks were ironclad, we’d all be immune. People can still contract the disease in spite of masks, handwashing, and social distancing — which are only preventive measures that minimize risk. It is odd that in a town as small as Washington, D.C., only Republicans took the hit.
The timing is a second factor.
Key Republicans fell ill after the Barrett announcement, the debate, and Comey’s flaccid testimony, and now we are full-blown into October — the final leg of the campaign. We have Radcliffe’s damning evidence that Obama, Comey and Brennan were aware of Hillary Clinton’s intent to frame Trump of colluding with Russia and, suddenly, Andy McCabe cannot do a Zoom appearance in the Senate under the pretext of fearing for his family’s safety from contracting COVID. Schumer, on cue, demands the cancellation of the Barrett hearings — all or part of which can be done remotely to prevent COVID spread. Moreover, Hidin’ Biden comes out of seclusion and hops on more planes in the last few days flying to Michigan and Florida than he has flown for most of September when he made a only few local appearances in Delaware and Pennsylvania, flew to Cleveland for the debate, called lids on half the days in September, and did a post-debate lame train tour where he interacted with few supporters.
Yet Donald Trump who, up until contracting the WuFlu, was doing back-to-back rallies in battleground states with overwhelming support from adoring audiences in the thousands, is suddenly relegated to Biden-style videos, seclusion, and waving from cars. This is like being in a cage for someone who is as gregarious and loves interacting with Americans as Trump. One would think that Biden, at his age and with his vulnerabilities, would be even more cautious and reluctant to travel and interact with voters in the last weeks of the campaign — especially after a potentially close encounter with the virus during the debates and seeing what it did to the President. And yet, as soon as Trump is sidelined, Biden is hopping on planes without a care in the world.
Finally, there is the fact that the most protected man in the universe, who has insisted on serving and interacting with the people despite the pandemic, refused to hover in an isolated bunker and managed to escape infection for seven months, suddenly gets a direct hit… again, in the final weeks of his campaign. Interrupting the one thing the Biden campaign cannot generate: a succession of popular rallies. We know the transmission could have resulted from a lapse in procedure, after all, those who protect and interact with the President are only human. But in an administration where enemies are constantly undermining the President, it doesn’t strain an iota of credulity to wonder if those same nefarious forces didn’t weaponize the virus and directly expose the president to it or use someone like Hope Hicks as a COVID bullet.
They’ve tried to impeach and remove him, force him to resign, discredit him, undermine his accomplishments, embarrass and ridicule him; they’ve wished him dead umpteen times; they’ve relentlessly threatened his life; and they’ve been clear they don’t care about his family or his health. Why not use the virus further to their advantage? While his security detail is adept at thwarting plots involving cars, guns, planes, bombs, and other visible weapons, there are myriad ways a virus can find its way to our president and other administration officials. And, after seven months, it did. A month before the election as he was ramping up his very successful airport hangar rallies. It’s too perfect to be mere happenstance.
With a little contact tracing and sleuthing, I wouldn’t be surprised if we find out this was an arrow in someone’s quiver and a doozy of an October surprise.
*********
(TLB) published this article from ZeroHedge as compiled and commented on by Tyler Durden.
Header featured image credit/Market Watch screen shot
(TLB) ed: We could have well published this article directly from American Thinker, but then it would not have had “the Tyler Touch” of a great intro and additional pictorial content of the seating arrangement. (TLB) Editors added the picture of the POTUS coming out of Walter Reed…. well because… the original quite frankly Sucked!
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-10-07--Is the UK Giving Up on Training Its Own Butchers, Bakers and IT Technicians?

ER Editor : We also recommend this piece from Migration Watch UK titled 150 more trades being opened to global recruitment as unemployment rises .
The Tory government will announce a new immigration plan on January 1 , 2021 , which is likely to decimate local employment in the trades , or at least drive wages down .
Of note : 1 .
The government have announced that the qualifications required for foreign workers to come to the UK will be reduced from degree level to “ A ” level when their new immigration system is introduced on 1 January @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will be no limit on the numbers that employers can recruit from overseas and the present requirement that job opportunities should first be advertised in the UK will be abolished .
3 .
This paper sets out the list of 150 trades and professions that are now to be exposed to global recruitment by the changes ( Annex D , p.8 ) , in addition to nearly 100 occupations that will face greater competition from overseas due to the annual cap on numbers being abandoned ( Annex C below , p.5 ) .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Party silent on this ?
Is the UK giving up on training our own butchers , bakers and IT technicians ?
• • Unlimited inflows of foreign skills will compete with British workers and undercut their training prospects • The changes add to risks of UK employees being displaced or undercut during a downturn The government ’ s immigration policy will open up the jobs of three million UK-born workers – including butchers , bakers , IT technicians , tailors and welders – to unlimited global recruitment at a time of deep concern @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Migration Watch UK is releasing a summary of three million full-time jobs held by UK-born workers in 150 occupational bands that are being exposed .
This comes just after the Migration Advisory Committee ( MAC ) recommended a major increase – from 2.5 million to 4 million – in the number of jobs into which non-UK workers may be recruited at lower salary levels as a result of being on a Shortage Occupation List .
Tellingly , the MAC noted of employers : “ Whilst respondents reported using a range of techniques to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ both the most commonly-stated solution to overcoming vacancies.
” It is shocking that the government is ploughing ahead with a plan that was first conceived before the Covid virus struck , even as UK unemployment shoots up , as companies collapse and as lay-offs continue to be announced .
Their plan flies directly in the face of public opinion – over 70 % of UK people want there to be a cap on work permits , while nearly 80 % say that they want the focus to be on getting UK people back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( Deltapoll , late 2019 and mid-2020 ) .
By about two to one , the public say that lowering skills and salary requirements for work permits is a bad move ( Deltapoll , August 2020 ) .
About seven million full-time jobs held by UK-born workers in a total of 250 occupational bands , which are set to be exposed to either new or greater global competition , including around four million UK-born workers in 100 highly-skilled occupations , are set to face greater pressure due to the cap being removed .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ British employers to invest in the training of British workers have fallen on deaf ears .
For instance , doctors and nurses were removed from the work permit cap in 2018 even as tens of thousands of UK applicants for the courses were being rejected ( UCAS ) .
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

ER Editor: We also recommend this piece from Migration Watch UK titled 150 more trades being opened to global recruitment as unemployment rises. The Tory government will announce a new immigration plan on January 1, 2021, which is likely to decimate local employment in the trades, or at least drive wages down. Of note:
1. The government have announced that the qualifications required for foreign workers to come to the UK will be reduced from degree level to “A” level when their new immigration system is introduced on 1 January 2021. 2. Furthermore, there will be no limit on the numbers that employers can recruit from overseas and the present requirement that job opportunities should first be advertised in the UK will be abolished. 3. This paper sets out the list of 150 trades and professions that are now to be exposed to global recruitment by the changes (Annex D, p.8), in addition to nearly 100 occupations that will face greater competition from overseas due to the annual cap on numbers being abandoned (Annex C below, p.5).
Why is Keir Starmer’s Labour Party silent on this?
********
Is the UK giving up on training our own butchers, bakers and IT technicians?
MIGRATION WATCH UK
October 01, 2020
Unlimited inflows of foreign skills will compete with British workers and undercut their training prospects The changes add to risks of UK employees being displaced or undercut during a downturn
The government’s immigration policy will open up the jobs of three million UK-born workers – including butchers, bakers, IT technicians, tailors and welders – to unlimited global recruitment at a time of deep concern about the prospect of higher unemployment.
Migration Watch UK is releasing a summary of three million full-time jobs held by UK-born workers in 150 occupational bands that are being exposed.
This comes just after the Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) recommended a major increase – from 2.5 million to 4 million – in the number of jobs into which non-UK workers may be recruited at lower salary levels as a result of being on a Shortage Occupation List.
Tellingly, the MAC noted of employers: “Whilst respondents reported using a range of techniques to fill vacancies, recruiting non-UK nationals was both the most commonly-stated solution to overcoming vacancies.”
It is shocking that the government is ploughing ahead with a plan that was first conceived before the Covid virus struck, even as UK unemployment shoots up, as companies collapse and as lay-offs continue to be announced.
Their plan flies directly in the face of public opinion – over 70% of UK people want there to be a cap on work permits, while nearly 80% say that they want the focus to be on getting UK people back to work – not on overseas hiring (Deltapoll, late 2019 and mid-2020).
By about two to one, the public say that lowering skills and salary requirements for work permits is a bad move (Deltapoll, August 2020).
About seven million full-time jobs held by UK-born workers in a total of 250 occupational bands, which are set to be exposed to either new or greater global competition, including around four million UK-born workers in 100 highly-skilled occupations, are set to face greater pressure due to the cap being removed.
Previous MAC warnings about the failure of British employers to invest in the training of British workers have fallen on deaf ears.
For instance, doctors and nurses were removed from the work permit cap in 2018 even as tens of thousands of UK applicants for the courses were being rejected (UCAS).
Alp Mehmet, Chairman of Migration Watch UK, said:
The exposure of millions of UK jobs to global recruitment in present circumstances risks seriously hurting British workers. As companies collapse, giving British workers a fair chance to apply for jobs in the UK must be the urgent need of the hour.
************
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-10-07--NHS Debacle: 1 Million Breast Cancer Screenings Missed, Treatment Made Conditional on Covid

We rarely use the word ‘ evil ’ , but deliberately conflating covid ‘ cases ’ ( false positives or real positives for what may be trace amounts of a coronavirus ) with genuinely very sick people – real cases , then denying cancer screening and treatment on the basis of all that word-play nonsense warrants the word ‘ evil ’ .
Below , we ’ re running a Daily Mail piece along with a recent report from Patrick Henningsen ’ s 21Century Wire .
The Daily Mail piece , as much as it criticizes the govt for making cancer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ predictably runs off at a panic tangent over the virus , feeding the government ’ s very own line on the ‘ seriousness ’ of the virus .
Mixed messaging .
Cancer vs .
Flu Morality ( because we don ’ t trust covid stats ) According to CancerResearchUK , there are approximately 165,000 cancer deaths every year in the UK , or 450 every day ( for 2015-2017 ) .
We found this BMJ article by editor John Stone from June 2018 ( covid wasn ’ t in sight then ) in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are ramping up flu death statistics by up to 150 times ( see Government exaggerates flu mortality again : why can not the public be trusted with the truth ? )
: Yes , that is England and Wales , which excludes Scotland and Northern Ireland ( England has by far and away the biggest population numbers in the UK anyway ) , but still , 335-340 flu deaths per year plus some extra for Scotland and N.Ireland means that flu deaths overall would still be in the low hundreds compared to cancer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sucharit Bhakdi in their excellent little volume that has just come out ( Corona , False Alarm ?
: Facts and Figures ) specify that , based on current statistical calculations , covid-19 deaths are approximately equal to those of a ‘ normal ’ flu season ( i.e .
a moderate flu season , not one that is exceptionally bad nor exceptionally mild .
Flu seasons can vary in mortality , with occasional ones having exceptionally high mortality ) .
On the flu season in Germany , they say : One flu death @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or 450 cancer deaths per day during a single year ?
The Daily Mail article refers to 2.5 million people missing cancer screening ; the 21Wire article refers to a million WOMEN missing out on early detection breast cancer screening .
We ’ re not sure how these two numbers intersect .
Could the Daily Mail ’ s 2.5 million figure be low-balling overall ?
10 million is the estimated number of Britons who will be calling on the NHS by Christmas for some kind of hospital treatment , including those who were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ began .
Matt Hancock warns cancer patients will only be guaranteed treatment if Covid-19 stays ‘ under control ’ – as he is savaged for ‘ having no idea how many infected people are walking around ’ after testing shambles saw 16,000 cases MISSED Matt Hancock has said that cancer treatments may be affected if the virus gets out of control as cases spiral by 12,000 yesterday and the Government reveals it missed 16,000 positive results due to an Excel Spreadsheet error Cancer patients may only be guaranteed treatment if Covid-19 stays @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claimed today as he faced a roasting from MPs over an Excel spreadsheet blunder that has potentially led to tens of thousands of Britons being unaware they are infected with the virus .
The Health Secretary claimed that it was ‘ critical for everybody to understand the best way to keep cancer services running is to suppress the disease ’ , suggesting that hundreds of thousands of patients may face delays to planned surgery and chemotherapy , if the outbreak continues to spiral .
Vital operations were cancelled and patients missed out on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tackling Covid-19 became the sole focus of the health service , instead of cancer and other cruel diseases .
Almost 2.5 million people missed out on cancer screening , referrals or treatment at the height of lockdown , even though the NHS was never overwhelmed — despite fears it would be crippled by the pandemic .
Experts now fear the number of people dying as a result of delays triggered by the treatment of coronavirus patients could even end up being responsible for as many deaths as the pandemic itself .
Surgeons have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ ring-fenced ’ for planned operations during the pandemic , to avoid the upheaval of spring where patients faced a ‘ tsunami of cancellations ’ as the health service focused on battling coronavirus .
But in a bruising appearance in the House of Commons today , Mr Hancock warned Covid-19 could once again disrupt cancer treatment and told MPs that controlling the virus would allow the NHS to ‘ recover the treatment that we need to for cancer and other killer diseases ’ .
He said : ‘ It ’ s critical for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to keep cancer services running is to suppress the disease ( ER : this is logic-defying when cancer services are NOT running ) , and the more the disease is under control the more we can both recover and continue with cancer treatments .
Labour also viciously tore into Mr Hancock ’ s latest blunder , which saw officials miss 16,000 positive test results because of a cataclysmic Excel error .
Around 50,000 of their contacts are estimated to have gone un-traced .
Firing on all cylinders after the his counterpart failed to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been traced , Shadow Health Secretary Jonathan Ashworth said : ‘ So , essentially there are thousands of people who have been exposed to the virus who are probably wandering around not knowing they ’ ve been exposed and could be infecting people , and he can not even tell us if they ’ ve been traced.
’ Recent reports from UK medical officials estimate that at least 8,600 women are now living with undetected breast cancer in the UK – a direct result of the government ’ s order to restrict NHS @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic.
’ But this is only the tip of a much larger iceberg .
Back in March , government and health officials claimed that the NHS had to be converted into a de facto ‘ COVID only ’ service , supposedly to deal with an alleged ‘ surge ’ predicted in the government ’ s own computer models .
But that overwhelming influx of COVID patients into UK hospitals never happened , as special COVID wards across the country were left largely empty .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use @ @ @ @ @ @ @ authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Pam Barker | Director of TLB Europe Reloaded Project
We rarely use the word ‘evil’, but deliberately conflating covid ‘cases’ (false positives or real positives for what may be trace amounts of a coronavirus) with genuinely very sick people – real cases, then denying cancer screening and treatment on the basis of all that word-play nonsense warrants the word ‘evil’.
Below, we’re running a Daily Mail piece along with a recent report from Patrick Henningsen’s 21Century Wire. The Daily Mail piece, as much as it criticizes the govt for making cancer care conditional on keeping covid-19 numbers down predictably runs off at a panic tangent over the virus, feeding the government’s very own line on the ‘seriousness’ of the virus. Mixed messaging.
Cancer vs. Flu Morality (because we don’t trust covid stats)
According to CancerResearchUK, there are approximately 165,000 cancer deaths every year in the UK, or 450 every day (for 2015-2017). We found this BMJ article by editor John Stone from June 2018 (covid wasn’t in sight then) in which he complains about how the media are ramping up flu death statistics by up to 150 times (see Government exaggerates flu mortality again: why cannot the public be trusted with the truth?):
On this basis, the number of deaths in England and Wales in an admittedly exceptionally bad year would have been only in the region of 335-340 deaths, and the ONS seem to have exaggerated the risk to the public by in the region of 150 times.
Yes, that is England and Wales, which excludes Scotland and Northern Ireland (England has by far and away the biggest population numbers in the UK anyway), but still, 335-340 flu deaths per year plus some extra for Scotland and N.Ireland means that flu deaths overall would still be in the low hundreds compared to cancer deaths. German doctors Karina Weiss and Sucharit Bhakdi in their excellent little volume that has just come out (Corona, False Alarm?: Facts and Figures) specify that, based on current statistical calculations, covid-19 deaths are approximately equal to those of a ‘normal’ flu season (i.e. a moderate flu season, not one that is exceptionally bad nor exceptionally mild. Flu seasons can vary in mortality, with occasional ones having exceptionally high mortality). On the flu season in Germany, they say:
Influenza viruses pass wave-like through the population. The waves can be small in one year and high in another. Case fatality rates are 0.1% to 0.2% during a normal flu season in Germany, which translates to several hundreds of deaths. (p.28)
One flu death per day during a single year, or 450 cancer deaths per day during a single year?
The Daily Mail article refers to 2.5 million people missing cancer screening; the 21Wire article refers to a million WOMEN missing out on early detection breast cancer screening. We’re not sure how these two numbers intersect. Could the Daily Mail’s 2.5 million figure be low-balling overall? 10 million is the estimated number of Britons who will be calling on the NHS by Christmas for some kind of hospital treatment, including those who were waiting for treatment before the ‘pandemic’ began.
********
Matt Hancock warns cancer patients will only be guaranteed treatment if Covid-19 stays ‘under control’ – as he is savaged for ‘having no idea how many infected people are walking around’ after testing shambles saw 16,000 cases MISSED
Matt Hancock has said that cancer treatments may be affected if the virus gets out of control as cases spiral by 12,000 yesterday and the Government reveals it missed 16,000 positive results due to an Excel Spreadsheet error Cancer patients may only be guaranteed treatment if Covid-19 stays ‘under control’, Matt Hancock claimed today as he faced a roasting from MPs over an Excel spreadsheet blunder that has potentially led to tens of thousands of Britons being unaware they are infected with the virus. The Health Secretary claimed that it was ‘critical for everybody to understand the best way to keep cancer services running is to suppress the disease’, suggesting that hundreds of thousands of patients may face delays to planned surgery and chemotherapy, if the outbreak continues to spiral. Vital operations were cancelled and patients missed out on potentially life-saving therapy in the spring because tackling Covid-19 became the sole focus of the health service, instead of cancer and other cruel diseases. Almost 2.5 million people missed out on cancer screening, referrals or treatment at the height of lockdown, even though the NHS was never overwhelmed — despite fears it would be crippled by the pandemic. Experts now fear the number of people dying as a result of delays triggered by the treatment of coronavirus patients could even end up being responsible for as many deaths as the pandemic itself. Surgeons have worriedly called for hospital beds to be ‘ring-fenced’ for planned operations during the pandemic, to avoid the upheaval of spring where patients faced a ‘tsunami of cancellations’ as the health service focused on battling coronavirus. But in a bruising appearance in the House of Commons today, Mr Hancock warned Covid-19 could once again disrupt cancer treatment and told MPs that controlling the virus would allow the NHS to ‘recover the treatment that we need to for cancer and other killer diseases’. He said: ‘It’s critical for everybody to understand that the best way to keep cancer services running is to suppress the disease (ER: this is logic-defying when cancer services are NOT running), and the more the disease is under control the more we can both recover and continue with cancer treatments. Labour also viciously tore into Mr Hancock’s latest blunder, which saw officials miss 16,000 positive test results because of a cataclysmic Excel error. Around 50,000 of their contacts are estimated to have gone un-traced. Firing on all cylinders after the his counterpart failed to answer exactly many of them have now been traced, Shadow Health Secretary Jonathan Ashworth said: ‘So, essentially there are thousands of people who have been exposed to the virus who are probably wandering around not knowing they’ve been exposed and could be infecting people, and he cannot even tell us if they’ve been traced.’ CONTINUE READING HERE ********
NHS Debacle: 1 Million Breast Cancer Screenings Missed Due to COVID Panic Policies
21Wire
Recent reports from UK medical officials estimate that at least 8,600 women are now living with undetected breast cancer in the UK – a direct result of the government’s order to restrict NHS care in the wake the coronavirus ‘pandemic.’ But this is only the tip of a much larger iceberg.
Back in March, government and health officials claimed that the NHS had to be converted into a de facto ‘COVID only’ service, supposedly to deal with an alleged ‘surge’ predicted in the government’s own computer models. But that overwhelming influx of COVID patients into UK hospitals never happened, as special COVID wards across the country were left largely empty.
To this day, the government and NHS official refuse to revert back to normal NHS care services, still claiming that ‘triaging’ (care by phone) of care and waiting lists must be maintained in order to prepare for an alleged “Second Wave” of COVID hospitalisations. But nowhere in the UK, or even in Europe, has this much-hyped second wave actually happened. GRAPH: UK hospitalisations and deaths due to COVID have virtually flat-lined over the last 6 months. One sizable at-risk group which has fallen victim to this collateral damage are those in dire need of early stage cancer detection screening. It is now estimated that at least one million breast screening appointments have been missed in the UK due to the country’s COVID-19 panic. To date, the Tory government led by Boris Johnson have never explained the rationale behind this open-ended, protracted ’emergency’ health policy which has denied health care to millions of Britons. SKY News reports on the scale and scope of this disturbing situation… Breast Cancer Now have estimated that around 986,000 women have missed mammograms in the UK after screening services were paused because of coronavirus. This includes 838,000 women in England, 78,000 in Scotland, 48,000 in Wales and 23,000 in Northern Ireland. The charity have also estimated that around 8,600 women could be living with undetected breast cancer. Breast screening services were temporarily paused to free up emergency NHS resources as well as trying to help reduce the spread of coronavirus. Breast Cancer Now have said it “is a grave concern” that nearly one million women will be caught in the backlog which will lead to further delays in diagnosis, adding that services have resumed at different speeds around the country. The charity has called on the NHS and government to set out how they plan to tackle an anticipated rise in demand for imaging and diagnostics. Baroness Delyth Morgan, chief executive at Breast Cancer Now, said: “Mammograms are a key tool in the early detection of breast cancer, which is critical to stopping women dying from the disease. “We understand that the breast screening programme was paused out of necessity due to the global COVID-19 pandemic, but we must now press play to ensure that all women can access breast screening, and we cannot afford for the programme to be paused again”…. Continue this story at SKY News In addition to the breast cancer scandal, there is still the overall issue of waiting lists caused by NHS care rationing, lockdowns and over-the-top fear of COVID promoted by government and mainstream media. The waiting lists for hospital treatment could reach as high as 10 million by Christmas, as health officials simply cannot deal with the huge backlog caused by the mass-panic and reactionary government policies. According to a report filed by UK health officials: “The total number of people waiting to undergo a procedure in a hospital in England such as a hernia repair, cataract removal or hip or knee replacement stood at 4.4 million before the pandemic. It then fell to 4.2 million because in March GPs referred fewer patients for care to help hospitals tackle the pandemic and also because some patients were reluctant to risk getting infected by going into hospital.” As the cost in lives and public services continues to mount, concerned members of the public are now asking: how long will the government stay trained on the current policy death spiral? ************ Original article Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-10-07--How to keep your country free even when it is, allegedly, not very well

Someone got the hump with me yesterday when I was on Boris ’ Johnson ’ s FB page having some fun leaving a few scathing comments .
They used the line , “ Well what would YOU do smart arse ?
” kind of thing .
Actually , it was a valid question in so far as if we are going to quite rightly criticise the Gang of Loons for their downright sinister approach to the business of national governance , we should at least be able to state what government policy SHOULD be that someone with the requisite people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ put into practice .
So you have got two basic things : • A workable policy that enables you to get the right result and • Managers with the necessary skill set who can then put the policy into practice .
“ Putting it into practice ” also includes continually assessing the results one is getting with it and amending the policy if something is not quite getting those results .
Funnily enough , making the second point work also requires the presence of a basic operating quality : honesty .
I think @ @ @ @ @ @ @ work : “ government will fail to serve the people to the degree that it is dishonest.
” But that of course depends on whether , if you are the government , you are TRYING to serve the people .
Many aren ’ t .
Many are trying to serve their pals or their blackmailers or some such thing .
So when we talk about “ getting results ” and “ workable policies ” and so forth , these depend for their meaning on what one is trying to do .
The incumbent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ workable policies and IS getting results – if the goal is the crushing of the nation and its subjugation to rule by a global oligarchy with the government and parliament a sort of management echelon steering the herd on the oligarchy ’ s behalf .
In that sense , Boris and his crew are doing a fine job of murdering Britannia in her sleep .
The reason they appear so smug about it is that they consider that is their job : their true allegiances are to some sort of globalist cult thingy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not the plebs , riffraff and hoi poloi like thee and me .
Be that conjecture as it may , I rattled off a reply as to what I would do if I found myself in government – or what I would want someone with the right skills to do .
I ’ ve since edited it a bit and the results are as follows .
In no particular order and off the top of my head : I ’ d stop talking up and propagandising this bug so as to make it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an apocalypse movie everyone has in the back of their mind .
In other words , I ’ d stop scaring the crap out of the citizenry .
This runs counter to the deeply insightful advice Boris is receiving from psychological warfare experts or psychiatrists or some such nutters on using Fear to steer the herd .
I would want a calm , confident citizenry able to think for themselves as these tend to be healthier and happier , more rational , less reactive – and less upset with one another or their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the exercise of Reason among the citizenry to the greatest possible degree as opposed to using fear to suppress it .
I would work hard at getting this message and others allied to it thoroughly out there , fully utilisimg my daily TV and press briefings and social media outlets .
My goal would be to firmly establish in the minds of the populace that their capabilities and potentials are far greater than anyone ( especially any government ) has allowed them to believe , that they ARE responsible for themselves and their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ responsibility .
My goal would be to avoid micro-managing the people , which is exhausting and does not work .
I would avoid the crass stupidity of having the over-worked police running around arresting people for not wearing masks and other stupidities as this ultimately cheeses off and alienates everyone , including the police .
I ’ d make sure people understood fully ( many do not at present appear to do so ) that the majority of them are at a very low statistical risk from this bug and knock off all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so forth that create a contrary impression .
This would better ensure that if at a later date some truly hideous pandemic comes along that I really do need to warn people about , I will actually be believed and not regarded as the dimwit who cried “ wolf !
” I would make sure people understood that the bug is comparable to a flu outbreak but less deadly to people who are not already very frail .
Thus I ’ d reduce the climate of fear that is making many people vulnerable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
I ’ d put a team together of proper epidemiologists and so forth and they would be able to show how the outbreak peaked BEFORE the lockdown and has gone through a natural cycle – much the same natural cycle other countries have gone through with or without lockdown .
I would not have had people released back into nursing homes from hospitals early so as to make bed space for the expected COVID rush as this brought infection INTO the nursing homes where the frail and scared elderly were vulnerable and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Death stats ) .
Very importantly , I would not have taken any advice from Ferguson as he was KNOWN to be incompetent , with a track record of wildly erroneous but alarming predictions .
The only reason one would trot out that man as one ’ s “ expert ” would be if one WANTED to create a scare .
There are plenty of real experts around , whose predictions turned out to be , as expected , much more accurate and less alarming .
I certainly would not have gone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were all going to lose loved ones “ before their time ” as Johnson did , which was a highly irresponsible thing to do .
Again , you only go on TV and make statements like that if you are TRYING to instill fear .
And you only try to instill fear if you ’ ve gotten the idea from somewhere that using fear is “ how you control people ” .
I ’ d make sure people understood the difference between “ Coronavirus ” , which refers to a family of viruses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one of that family .
And I ’ d stop the Health Secretary mixing up the terms so as to confuse people .
For instance , “ Five hundred people tested positive for Coronavirus ” does not mean the same thing as “ 500 people tested positive for COVID19 ” .
I ’ d identify which demographic groups are at serious risk – mainly the very old and/or very ill – and pull out all the stops to shield THEM .
I would not have on my team ANY “ advisors ” with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pharmaceutical industry and so forth .
There are plenty of highly qualified , high-integrity epidemiologists , virologists and so on who would be willing to help by the impartial contribution of their expertise .
To treat the nation with respect and foster trust I would hold all meetings of my advisors on camera and make the recordings of these meeting freely available so that everyone can know what was said by whom and to whom .
I would not have long private phone calls with Bill Gates or any other vested interest .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ their input but would make all such input a matter of public record so that everyone can know exactly what was said by who to whom .
Such private , hidden communication/influence lines undermine democracy and the integrity of the government .
I would encourage a search for a vaccine as ONE of the options we could pursue .
However I would not under any circumstances condone sloppy or incomplete research or the notion that vaccine manufacturers who kill or harm the citizenry because of such carelessness or recklessness are somehow not responsible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is not the place of the government to encourage , condone or facilitate the poisoning of its citizens .
I would not make vaccine compulsory but safeguard the right of the citizen to make his or her own choices on the matter of their health .
To assist in that I would make sure any side effects and so forth of the vaccines are fully known and understood and that the exact risks of the virus they are intended to handle are known and understood so that every citizen can weigh up the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the virus and decide thereon which is the optimum solution .
I would knock off endlessly bleating on about “ be safe ” – which subtly implants the fear of how dangerous the environment is and push instead the message “ be strong ” or “ be confident ” .
I ’ d want a nation of TIGERS not a herd of ruddy cheep .
Sure it ’ s a tough universe but the tigers stand a better chance than sheep .
I ’ d make sure that when death stats were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ actually at risk so as to avoid a generalised fear for people who are at little or no risk ( which is the vast majority of the population and almost everybody under 45 ) .
I would keep the schools open but again make sure that any vulnerable children are schooled at home ( the bug is unlike the flu in that it does not , overall , tend to target kids , thank God ) .
To help with this , I would utilise some of the three quarters of a million @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ d give people in nursing homes a CHOICE on whether they prefer to be isolated or take their chances and see their families in their last months of life .
Being imprisoned in their rooms and denied the companionship of their loved ones at the very closing weeks or months of their long lives , condemning them to lonely deaths , is about as cruel a thing – bordering on freakin ’ sadism – as you could do to a senior citizen and no doubt hastened the death of many .
I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nation ’ s survival and standard of living – not to mention its morale ( low morale also has an effect on overall health ) – depends on production and the survival of the NHS depends on a healthy economy to sustain it .
I ’ d keep people sick or dying with other serious illnesses serviced by the NHS and not sacrifice their lives .
I ’ d stop using the PCR test as it is extremely inaccurate and not designed for the purpose of diagnosing disease and only useful if you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I ’ d make sure people understood that this particular bug is not airborne as it seems that many people do not yet understand this .
I would embark on a broad , flat-out program to educate people on the benefits of hand washing , not coughing in people ’ s faces and the usual , sensible hygiene measures one should use in any outbreak .
I ’ d make sure they understood how good soap is for breaking down the layer of fat that protects the virus .
I ’ d make @ @ @ @ @ @ @ distancing and masks – the latter do have a limited workability ( possibly outweighed by the harm from long-term wearing ) .
I ’ d keep up an educational program to instil these ideas and get people to use them of their own free will and from their natural sense of kinship and desire to help one another .
I would NOT make any of these common-sense measure compulsory or accompanied by implied threats .
People will for instance willingly wear masks in crowded spaces if they believe they are truly helping others @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get them upset by the idea and resistant to it , is to make it compulsory .
One sure-fire way to get people really resistant to wearing masks and demonstrating about it all over the place is to have a not particularly impressive politician with a bad haircut go on TV and start chucking his weight about with YOU MUSTS and threats and so forth .
I would have pulled out all the stops to get known remedies such as hydroxychloroquine in use pronto for anyone who wants it .
I would get @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out about the vaccine that was developed in Russia and endorsed by Mr Putin personally and which the media went strangely silent about ( probably because an effective and safe vaccine developed in Russia and made available relatively cheaply would undermine any lingering hopes the pharmaceutical industry still has of making vast sums of money out of the existing scamdemic ) .
If the Russian vaccine panned out I would do a deal with Russia to get it supplied to us at low cost to the tax payer and made available to anyone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
I would embark on a program to thoroughly educate kids and adults on how to strengthen their immune systems and general resistance to disease through diet , ( not eating crap , overusing drugs , medications and alcohol , all of which also make one vulnerable to the bug ) .
This would include making sure people were educated on how to look after their own immune systems with vitamins D and C and Zinc etc ) .
This vital education that would put the citizenry much more in the driving seat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ still strangely missing and its provision would be a great service to the people .
I would treat the British people with some respect and do them the honour of regarding them as intelligent adults .
I would , if needed , use some of the army of 75000 public-spirited people who when this thing started volunteered to help , to do things such as getting supplies to people who are quarantined or self isolated .
I would keep parliamentary democracy fully functioning , knock off threatening talk about “ bringing in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ similar nuttiness .
Should there yet turn out to be any need to assist people with government money ( unlikely as the economy has not been shut down ) I would NOT borrow the money .
Currently when the government borrows money from the banking cartels and so forth , in a nutshell what happens is the banks CREATE ( “ print ” ) the money in order to lend it , then charge the government interest and the interest is paid back by extracting it from the citizenry via taxes .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who make a lot of easy money off , ultimately , the industry of the people but it is also quite daft .
So instead of having the banks create it , then lend it to the government at interest so the government can give it to the citizenry from whom it later extracts the interest , I would cut out the extraneous complexities and simply have the government create it debt- and interest-free and give it to the citizenry .
Of course this creation of money not tied to increased production might @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would be important to KEEP PRODUCTION GOING or even increase it so as to prevent a loss of purchasing power of the means of exchange .
But that it another story .
All this is in the context of WHAT WE ARE ACTUALLY FACING .
A more deadly and more broadly homicidal virus might require more draconian measures swiftly implemented but that is not the reality of what we are dealing with right now , although there are some who are doing their level best to convince us otherwise .
Indeed , I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ knowledge of humanity on medicine , hygiene , sanitation , quarantine , mass hysteria , the immune system , , the roles of vitamins such as C and D and zinc , the benefits of good nutrition and so on and so forth and knowledge of how viruses actually behave , the “ doomsday ” scenario may only be “ real ” in movies and the “ threat ” thereof amplified in the public mind by criminals as a control technique .
But that too is another story .

by Steve Cook
Someone got the hump with me yesterday when I was on Boris’ Johnson’s FB page having some fun leaving a few scathing comments. They used the line, “Well what would YOU do smart arse?” kind of thing.
Actually, it was a valid question in so far as if we are going to quite rightly criticise the Gang of Loons for their downright sinister approach to the business of national governance, we should at least be able to state what government policy SHOULD be that someone with the requisite people, management and leadership skills could then put into practice.
So you have got two basic things:
A workable policy that enables you to get the right result and
Managers with the necessary skill set who can then put the policy into practice. “Putting it into practice” also includes continually assessing the results one is getting with it and amending the policy if something is not quite getting those results.
Funnily enough, making the second point work also requires the presence of a basic operating quality: honesty. I think there is probably a natural law at work: “government will fail to serve the people to the degree that it is dishonest.”
But that of course depends on whether, if you are the government, you are TRYING to serve the people. Many aren’t. Many are trying to serve their pals or their blackmailers or some such thing.
So when we talk about “getting results” and “workable policies” and so forth, these depend for their meaning on what one is trying to do. The incumbent government, for instance, DOES have workable policies and IS getting results – if the goal is the crushing of the nation and its subjugation to rule by a global oligarchy with the government and parliament a sort of management echelon steering the herd on the oligarchy’s behalf. In that sense, Boris and his crew are doing a fine job of murdering Britannia in her sleep. The reason they appear so smug about it is that they consider that is their job: their true allegiances are to some sort of globalist cult thingy and not the British people – certainly not the plebs, riffraff and hoi poloi like thee and me.
Be that conjecture as it may, I rattled off a reply as to what I would do if I found myself in government – or what I would want someone with the right skills to do.
I’ve since edited it a bit and the results are as follows.
In no particular order and off the top of my head:
I’d stop falsifying the stats for a start.
I’d stop talking up and propagandising this bug so as to make it look like the genocidal pandemic scenario from an apocalypse movie everyone has in the back of their mind. In other words, I’d stop scaring the crap out of the citizenry. This runs counter to the deeply insightful advice Boris is receiving from psychological warfare experts or psychiatrists or some such nutters on using Fear to steer the herd.
I would want a calm, confident citizenry able to think for themselves as these tend to be healthier and happier, more rational, less reactive – and less upset with one another or their government. I would go for encouraging the exercise of Reason among the citizenry to the greatest possible degree as opposed to using fear to suppress it.
I would work hard at getting this message and others allied to it thoroughly out there, fully utilisimg my daily TV and press briefings and social media outlets. My goal would be to firmly establish in the minds of the populace that their capabilities and potentials are far greater than anyone (especially any government) has allowed them to believe, that they ARE responsible for themselves and their fellows and perfectly capable of exercising that responsibility. My goal would be to avoid micro-managing the people, which is exhausting and does not work. I would avoid the crass stupidity of having the over-worked police running around arresting people for not wearing masks and other stupidities as this ultimately cheeses off and alienates everyone, including the police.
I’d make sure people understood fully (many do not at present appear to do so) that the majority of them are at a very low statistical risk from this bug and knock off all utterances, propaganda, mind games and so forth that create a contrary impression.
This would better ensure that if at a later date some truly hideous pandemic comes along that I really do need to warn people about, I will actually be believed and not regarded as the dimwit who cried “wolf!”
I would make sure people understood that the bug is comparable to a flu outbreak but less deadly to people who are not already very frail.
Thus I’d reduce the climate of fear that is making many people vulnerable (mood affects the immune system).
I’d put a team together of proper epidemiologists and so forth and they would be able to show how the outbreak peaked BEFORE the lockdown and has gone through a natural cycle – much the same natural cycle other countries have gone through with or without lockdown.
I would not have had people released back into nursing homes from hospitals early so as to make bed space for the expected COVID rush as this brought infection INTO the nursing homes where the frail and scared elderly were vulnerable and died in large numbers (pushing up the Death stats).
Very importantly, I would not have taken any advice from Ferguson as he was KNOWN to be incompetent, with a track record of wildly erroneous but alarming predictions. The only reason one would trot out that man as one’s “expert” would be if one WANTED to create a scare. There are plenty of real experts around, whose predictions turned out to be, as expected, much more accurate and less alarming.
I certainly would not have gone on TV and told the nation they were all going to lose loved ones “before their time” as Johnson did, which was a highly irresponsible thing to do. Again, you only go on TV and make statements like that if you are TRYING to instill fear. And you only try to instill fear if you’ve gotten the idea from somewhere that using fear is “how you control people”.
I’d make sure people understood the difference between “Coronavirus”, which refers to a family of viruses and the COVID bug that is just one of that family. And I’d stop the Health Secretary mixing up the terms so as to confuse people. For instance, “Five hundred people tested positive for Coronavirus” does not mean the same thing as “500 people tested positive for COVID19”.
I’d identify which demographic groups are at serious risk – mainly the very old and/or very ill – and pull out all the stops to shield THEM.
I would not have on my team ANY “advisors” with ANY vested interests in vaccines or the pharmaceutical industry and so forth. There are plenty of highly qualified, high-integrity epidemiologists, virologists and so on who would be willing to help by the impartial contribution of their expertise.
To treat the nation with respect and foster trust I would hold all meetings of my advisors on camera and make the recordings of these meeting freely available so that everyone can know what was said by whom and to whom.
I would not have long private phone calls with Bill Gates or any other vested interest. I would not prevent such people contributing their input but would make all such input a matter of public record so that everyone can know exactly what was said by who to whom. Such private, hidden communication/influence lines undermine democracy and the integrity of the government.
I would encourage a search for a vaccine as ONE of the options we could pursue. However I would not under any circumstances condone sloppy or incomplete research or the notion that vaccine manufacturers who kill or harm the citizenry because of such carelessness or recklessness are somehow not responsible for the harm they do. It is not the place of the government to encourage, condone or facilitate the poisoning of its citizens. I would not make vaccine compulsory but safeguard the right of the citizen to make his or her own choices on the matter of their health. To assist in that I would make sure any side effects and so forth of the vaccines are fully known and understood and that the exact risks of the virus they are intended to handle are known and understood so that every citizen can weigh up the risks of the vaccines against the risks of the virus and decide thereon which is the optimum solution.
I would knock off endlessly bleating on about “be safe” – which subtly implants the fear of how dangerous the environment is and push instead the message “be strong” or “be confident”. I’d want a nation of TIGERS not a herd of ruddy cheep. Sure it’s a tough universe but the tigers stand a better chance than sheep.
I’d make sure that when death stats were published people understood which demographic groups were actually at risk so as to avoid a generalised fear for people who are at little or no risk (which is the vast majority of the population and almost everybody under 45).
I would keep the schools open but again make sure that any vulnerable children are schooled at home (the bug is unlike the flu in that it does not, overall, tend to target kids, thank God). To help with this, I would utilise some of the three quarters of a million people who volunteered to help.
I’d give people in nursing homes a CHOICE on whether they prefer to be isolated or take their chances and see their families in their last months of life. Being imprisoned in their rooms and denied the companionship of their loved ones at the very closing weeks or months of their long lives, condemning them to lonely deaths, is about as cruel a thing – bordering on freakin’ sadism – as you could do to a senior citizen and no doubt hastened the death of many.
I’d keep production going because the nation’s survival and standard of living – not to mention its morale (low morale also has an effect on overall health) – depends on production and the survival of the NHS depends on a healthy economy to sustain it.
I’d keep people sick or dying with other serious illnesses serviced by the NHS and not sacrifice their lives.
I’d stop using the PCR test as it is extremely inaccurate and not designed for the purpose of diagnosing disease and only useful if you are trying to propagandise an epidemic.
I’d make sure people understood that this particular bug is not airborne as it seems that many people do not yet understand this.
I would embark on a broad, flat-out program to educate people on the benefits of hand washing, not coughing in people’s faces and the usual, sensible hygiene measures one should use in any outbreak. I’d make sure they understood how good soap is for breaking down the layer of fat that protects the virus. I’d make sure they understood the reasoned use of distancing and masks – the latter do have a limited workability (possibly outweighed by the harm from long-term wearing).
I’d keep up an educational program to instil these ideas and get people to use them of their own free will and from their natural sense of kinship and desire to help one another. I would NOT make any of these common-sense measure compulsory or accompanied by implied threats. People will for instance willingly wear masks in crowded spaces if they believe they are truly helping others by so doing. One way to get them upset by the idea and resistant to it, is to make it compulsory.
One sure-fire way to get people really resistant to wearing masks and demonstrating about it all over the place is to have a not particularly impressive politician with a bad haircut go on TV and start chucking his weight about with YOU MUSTS and threats and so forth.
I would have pulled out all the stops to get known remedies such as hydroxychloroquine in use pronto for anyone who wants it.
I would get in touch with Vladimir Putin and find out about the vaccine that was developed in Russia and endorsed by Mr Putin personally and which the media went strangely silent about (probably because an effective and safe vaccine developed in Russia and made available relatively cheaply would undermine any lingering hopes the pharmaceutical industry still has of making vast sums of money out of the existing scamdemic). If the Russian vaccine panned out I would do a deal with Russia to get it supplied to us at low cost to the tax payer and made available to anyone who wants it (see above).
I would embark on a program to thoroughly educate kids and adults on how to strengthen their immune systems and general resistance to disease through diet, (not eating crap, overusing drugs, medications and alcohol, all of which also make one vulnerable to the bug). This would include making sure people were educated on how to look after their own immune systems with vitamins D and C and Zinc etc). This vital education that would put the citizenry much more in the driving seat of his or her own health is still strangely missing and its provision would be a great service to the people.
I would treat the British people with some respect and do them the honour of regarding them as intelligent adults.
I would, if needed, use some of the army of 75000 public-spirited people who when this thing started volunteered to help, to do things such as getting supplies to people who are quarantined or self isolated.
I would keep parliamentary democracy fully functioning, knock off threatening talk about “bringing in the army” or “marshals” and similar nuttiness.
Should there yet turn out to be any need to assist people with government money (unlikely as the economy has not been shut down) I would NOT borrow the money. Currently when the government borrows money from the banking cartels and so forth, in a nutshell what happens is the banks CREATE (“print”) the money in order to lend it, then charge the government interest and the interest is paid back by extracting it from the citizenry via taxes. This is just lovely for the banking cartels who make a lot of easy money off, ultimately, the industry of the people but it is also quite daft. So instead of having the banks create it, then lend it to the government at interest so the government can give it to the citizenry from whom it later extracts the interest, I would cut out the extraneous complexities and simply have the government create it debt- and interest-free and give it to the citizenry.
Of course this creation of money not tied to increased production might (MIGHT) prove inflationary so it would be important to KEEP PRODUCTION GOING or even increase it so as to prevent a loss of purchasing power of the means of exchange. But that it another story.
All this is in the context of WHAT WE ARE ACTUALLY FACING. A more deadly and more broadly homicidal virus might require more draconian measures swiftly implemented but that is not the reality of what we are dealing with right now, although there are some who are doing their level best to convince us otherwise.
Indeed, I would argue that given the state of knowledge of humanity on medicine, hygiene, sanitation, quarantine, mass hysteria, the immune system,, the roles of vitamins such as C and D and zinc, the benefits of good nutrition and so on and so forth and knowledge of how viruses actually behave, the “doomsday” scenario may only be “real” in movies and the “threat” thereof amplified in the public mind by criminals as a control technique.
But that too is another story.
First featured on UK Reloaded
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.