thelibertybeacon--2020-07-10--A Threat To British Workers As Record Unemployment Looms

• An expanded route for workers from all over the world ( which the Home Office believes could lead to between 15,000 and 50,000 more non-EU workers – including dependants – per year ) .
[ The Home Office has pointed to significant limitations in these estimates and they should be treated with caution ] .
• A new graduate route for students to stay on and work for two years – with many if not most going into unskilled roles ( the Home Office says this could drive a net rise in student immigration numbers by 20,000-25,000 per year @ @ @ @ @ @ @ study and work and gain citizenship for up to three million people from Hong Kong .
• Possible expansion of the youth mobility scheme for those aged 18-30 from the EU to work in jobs at any skill level for up to two years ( dependent on negotiations ) .
See Telegraph , Feb. 2020 .
It is clear that the Covid-19 crisis will lead to a very high level of unemployment .
The number of Britons claiming unemployment benefits soared to the highest level since 1996 in April .
However , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the mass displacement of UK workers at a pivotal moment when they are already very vulnerable .
Ministers and MPs must also remember that , following the 2008 financial crisis , it took six years for the number of UK-born workers to regain its pre-crash level , while the number of workers born abroad increased by more than a million as employers sought out cheaper labour .
The government would be wise to amend their plan in order to : ( a ) have in readiness powers to impose a cap on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of being done at very short notice as the courts would rule that all applications in the pipeline should be decided under the previous rules .
( b ) postpone indefinitely the “ new entrant ” route that gives employers the simplest work-around to avoid meeting headline salary thresholds .
( c ) retain the long-standing requirement that jobs first be advertised in the UK .
This is a vital safeguard for jobseekers that will be especially important during a period of high unemployment .
Employers must do all they can to take @ @ @ @ @ @ @ d ) Maintain the general salary threshold for high-skill workers at the level of £30,000 and the qualification criterion at the present degree level .
The government states in their impact analysis that [ the changes ] ‘ will provide employers with greater scope to employ skilled migrants from overseas ‘ .
Why on earth would Ministers contemplate this during a massive economic crisis ?
Their own estimates suggest that certain types of immigration ( e.g .
non-EU students and workers ) would rise – something they have not previously acknowledged .
For @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with their dependants ) could go up , they say , by between 15,000-50,000 per year .
They also envisage that student numbers might go up ( net ) by 20,000-25,000 per year .
Of course this may be offset by their estimate that net EU work migration would fall by 50,000 to 100,000 per year over the first four years before gradually stabilising upwards ( although they note inflows are likely to fall even in the absence of these policies being enacted ) .
Whether any rise in non-EU numbers would be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in EU workers is another question .
It will partially depend on how the Covid-19 crisis plays out not just in the UK but also in the EU .
However , the greater incentive for millions in much poorer and much larger countries such as Pakistan , the Philippines and Nigeria to come here may mean numbers rising faster than the government anticipates .
It is also simply wrong that jobs should no longer have to be advertised in the UK before being opened up to recruits around the globe ( see p.55 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s February 2020 policy statement ) .
The government also wants to abolish a rule that requires employers to advertise jobs here in the UK prior to attempting to fill the vacancy from overseas .
The official expert committee on migration has said very clearly that this rule ‘ helps prevent any short-term displacement of the UK workforce .
It also helps ensure that UK workers have been given a chance to apply for vacancies ’ .
For this reason and many more , it is vital that this ‘ First Chance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now ( see our piece on this topic ) .
The government proposals were always risky but have now been completely overtaken by economic problems resulting from the lockdown .
This is absolutely not the time to be opening up six million jobs to new or increased global recruitment ( see our piece regarding this calculation ) .
NB See press coverage of Migration Watch UK : The Sun : ‘ MPs overwhelmingly back Boris Johnson ’ s post-Brexit points-based immigration system ’ Mail Online : ‘ New immigration system will see 50,000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the UK each year ’

ER Editor: The date of the article below is May 9, 2020, written well after covid lockdown began in late March.
Please also see Migrant Watch UK‘s piece from July 8, 2020 titled Estimate of arrivals by illegal Channel crossing. Of note:
These figures concern illegals who enter Britain via Channel crossings. It does NOT include UK government policy to admit into the UK each year overseas workers in certain categories , which directly threatens British workers’ jobs. And which seems to be increasing if anything. For that, see below.
3. If that trend continues to the end of 2020, this would mean that the total arriving during the year would be four times the total of nearly 1,900 who arrived in 2019, or nearly 7,600.
2. The number of crossings in the year so far – 2,400 – is four times the 600 or so that came during the first six months of 2019 (visit our regularly-updated Channel Tracking Station ).
1. The number of people arriving in the UK via illegal Channel crossing is on course to reach at least 7,500 in 2020 should they continue at the rate seen since January.
(ER: given the scale of immigration into the UK over many years, this figure seems improbably low.)
An expanded route for workers from all over the world (which the Home Office believes could lead to between 15,000 and 50,000 more non-EU workers – including dependants – per year ). [The Home Office has pointed to significant limitations in these estimates and they should be treated with caution].
(which the Home Office believes could lead to between more non-EU workers – including dependants – ). [The Home Office has pointed to significant limitations in these estimates and they should be treated with caution]. A new graduate route for students to stay on and work for two years – with many if not most going into unskilled roles (the Home Office says this could drive a net rise in student immigration numbers by 20,000-25,000 per year).
– with many if not most going into (the Home Office says this could drive a net rise in student immigration numbers by per year). A new route to study and work and gain citizenship for up to three million people from Hong Kong.
people from Hong Kong. Possible expansion of the youth mobility scheme for those aged 18-30 from the EU to work in jobs at any skill level for up to two years (dependent on negotiations). See Telegraph, Feb. 2020.
It is clear that the Covid-19 crisis will lead to a very high level of unemployment. The number of Britons claiming unemployment benefits soared to the highest level since 1996 in April.
However, the new immigration plan astonishingly raises the risk of the mass displacement of UK workers at a pivotal moment when they are already very vulnerable.
Ministers and MPs must also remember that, following the 2008 financial crisis, it took six years for the number of UK-born workers to regain its pre-crash level, while the number of workers born abroad increased by more than a million as employers sought out cheaper labour.
The government would be wise to amend their plan in order to:
(a) have in readiness powers to impose a cap on work permits. This must be capable of being done at very short notice as the courts would rule that all applications in the pipeline should be decided under the previous rules.
(b) postpone indefinitely the “new entrant” route that gives employers the simplest work-around to avoid meeting headline salary thresholds.
(c) retain the long-standing requirement that jobs first be advertised in the UK. This is a vital safeguard for jobseekers that will be especially important during a period of high unemployment. Employers must do all they can to take on workers already in the UK.
d) Maintain the general salary threshold for high-skill workers at the level of £30,000 and the qualification criterion at the present degree level.
The government states in their impact analysis that [the changes] ‘will provide employers with greater scope to employ skilled migrants from overseas‘.
Why on earth would Ministers contemplate this during a massive economic crisis?
Their own estimates suggest that certain types of immigration (e.g. non-EU students and workers) would rise – something they have not previously acknowledged. For example, non-EU worker numbers (along with their dependants) could go up, they say, by between 15,000-50,000 per year.
They also envisage that student numbers might go up (net) by 20,000-25,000 per year.
Of course this may be offset by their estimate that net EU work migration would fall by 50,000 to 100,000 per year over the first four years before gradually stabilising upwards (although they note inflows are likely to fall even in the absence of these policies being enacted).
Whether any rise in non-EU numbers would be completely or partially offset by a fall in EU workers is another question.
It will partially depend on how the Covid-19 crisis plays out not just in the UK but also in the EU.
However, the greater incentive for millions in much poorer and much larger countries such as Pakistan, the Philippines and Nigeria to come here may mean numbers rising faster than the government anticipates.
It is also simply wrong that jobs should no longer have to be advertised in the UK before being opened up to recruits around the globe (see p.55 of the Impact Assessment and the government’s February 2020 policy statement).
The government also wants to abolish a rule that requires employers to advertise jobs here in the UK prior to attempting to fill the vacancy from overseas.
The official expert committee on migration has said very clearly that this rule ‘helps prevent any short-term displacement of the UK workforce. It also helps ensure that UK workers have been given a chance to apply for vacancies’.
For this reason and many more, it is vital that this ‘First Chance Rule’ is not scrapped – especially now (see our piece on this topic).
The government proposals were always risky but have now been completely overtaken by economic problems resulting from the lockdown.
This is absolutely not the time to be opening up six million jobs to new or increased global recruitment (see our piece regarding this calculation).
NB See press coverage of Migration Watch UK:
The Sun: ‘MPs overwhelmingly back Boris Johnson’s post-Brexit points-based immigration system’
Mail Online: ‘New immigration system will see 50,000 extra non-EU workers and families let into the UK each year’


thelibertybeacon--2020-07-10--The Bioethicist Pandemic – The Mere Utility Value of Human Life

Here is the terrifying problem .
The most influential of our would-be health-care overlords hold immoral and amoral values not shared by most of those who would be impacted by their policy prescriptions .
For example , most mainstream practitioners reject the belief that human beings have unique value and — unless they have a modifier such as “ Catholic ” or “ pro-life ” in front of their identifier — embrace a utilitarian “ quality of life ” approach to medical decision-making , according to which some of us are judged to have greater worth than others based on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state of health , and age .
This ideology leads the field ’ s most prominent leaders into very dark places .
In 1997 , bioethics professor John Hardwig argued in favor of what is known in the field as the “ duty to die.
” Hardwig ’ s advocacy was not published in an obscure corner of the internet of little consequence .
Rather , it was presented with all due respect in the Hastings Center Report , the world ’ s most prestigious bioethics journal .
That fact alone means that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ long been deemed respectable in the field .
Hardwig argues that to “ have reached the age of say , seventy-five or eighty without being ready to die is itself a moral failing , the sign of a life out of touch with life ’ s basic realities.
” Why ?
— Back in 1997 , Hardwig ’ s denigration of people he deemed “ burdens ” was a minority view in bioethics .
But over the years , as the field gained increasing influence , its premier practitioners grew more pronouncedly ideological @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and repeatedly for reducing the moral status of the most vulnerable among us , in some cases even going so far as to redefine helpless human beings as mere natural resources ripe for the harvest .
Here are just a few examples : • Paying women to gestate and abort : Bioethicist Jacob Appel argued in the Huffington Post that pregnant women who want to abort should be paid to gestate longer before terminating so that fetal organs could be harvested and used in transplant medicine .
That would increase the number of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said a market in fetal organs could “ bring solace to women who have already decided upon abortion , but desire that some additional social good come from the procedure.
” • Forcing caregivers to starve dementia patients : Prominent bioethicist Thaddeus Mason Pope ( and others ) want dementia patients to be allowed to instruct future caregivers to deny them spoon-feeding when they become incompetent .
In such cases , they want caregivers to be legally bound to starve their patients to death .
This would apply even if the patient willingly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as the new “ death with dignity.
” • Experimenting on cognitively disabled “ non-persons ” : Writing in the Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal , bioethics bigwig Thomas Beauchamp opined that some cognitively disabled human beings should not be viewed as “ persons , ” meaning that could “ be treated in the same way we treat relevantly similar nonhumans .
For example , they might be aggressively used as human research subjects and sources of organs.
” • Transplanting organs of unconscious humans into animals : Several authors argued in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Oxford University , so it is not a tinfoil-hat internet site — that unconscious patients should be able to be used in xenotransplantation experiments — e.g .
removing the human ’ s organs and replacing them with those of animals ( usually pigs ) .
They write sickeningly , “ As the autonomic and vegetative functions of PVS [ permanent vegetative status ] bodies can often be maintained for years , their use would allow the opportunity to fully test the long-term consequences of a solid organ xenotransplantation.
” • Harvesting hearts as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ article published in the Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation argued that patients who wish to be euthanized be killed by having their hearts removed for transplantation .
The authors write that “ ‘ living donation ’ is the correct term to use , even though this is normally used for people who donate their kidney , and do not die as a result of donation.
” Yes , indeed : Stripping a beating heart out of a patient ’ s body will be 100 percent fatal .
One would think that in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bioethicists would place their dehumanizing advocacy efforts at least on temporary hold .
No such luck .
The Journal of Medical Ethics just published a piece explicitly aimed at COVID-19 patients by the internationally prominent bioethicists and Oxford professors Julian Savulescu and Dominic Wilkinson .
First , the authors want a license to permit seriously ill COVID-19 patients to be consensually experimented upon — even if the research is dangerous .
From “ Extreme Altruism in a Pandemic ” : That might seem reasonable — assuming the tests would be aimed at saving @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to include potentially lethal experimentation in the license that would not benefit the patient : The authors then boldly plunge even deeper into the utilitarian swamp to urge “ organ donation euthanasia ” of COVID-19 patients in places where hastening death by doctors is legal : Savulescu and Wilkinson also want to allow experimentation on nursing home patients — even if they are not sick : To prevent unwanted burdening of medical resources if the patient becomes ill , the authors would restrict the experimentation to patients who had “ completed a living @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for invasive medical treatments in the event of becoming seriously unwell , ” meaning nursing home patients could be intentionally infected with coronavirus and then , if they became seriously ill , simply allowed to die .
Meanwhile , back at the Hastings Center Report , bioethicist Larry R. Churchill — who is himself age 75 — advocates a type of duty to die upon the aged .
From “ On Being an Elder in a Pandemic ” : Award-winning author Wesley J. Smith is a chair of the Discovery Institute ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the Patients Rights Council .

Here is the terrifying problem. The most influential of our would-be health-care overlords hold immoral and amoral values not shared by most of those who would be impacted by their policy prescriptions. For example, most mainstream practitioners reject the belief that human beings have unique value and — unless they have a modifier such as “Catholic” or “pro-life” in front of their identifier — embrace a utilitarian “quality of life” approach to medical decision-making, according to which some of us are judged to have greater worth than others based on discriminatory criteria such as cognitive capacity, state of health, and age.
This ideology leads the field’s most prominent leaders into very dark places. In 1997, bioethics professor John Hardwig argued in favor of what is known in the field as the “duty to die.” Hardwig’s advocacy was not published in an obscure corner of the internet of little consequence. Rather, it was presented with all due respect in the Hastings Center Report, the world’s most prestigious bioethics journal. That fact alone means that the “duty to die” has long been deemed respectable in the field.
Hardwig argues that to “have reached the age of say, seventy-five or eighty without being ready to die is itself a moral failing, the sign of a life out of touch with life’s basic realities.” Why? —
“A duty to die is more likely when continuing to live will impose significant burdens — emotional burdens, extensive caregiving, destruction of life plans, and yes, financial hardship — on your family and loved ones. This is the fundamental insight underlying a duty to die.”
Back in 1997, Hardwig’s denigration of people he deemed “burdens” was a minority view in bioethics. But over the years, as the field gained increasing influence, its premier practitioners grew more pronouncedly ideological in the Hardwig manner — arguing often and repeatedly for reducing the moral status of the most vulnerable among us, in some cases even going so far as to redefine helpless human beings as mere natural resources ripe for the harvest. Here are just a few examples:
Paying women to gestate and abort: Bioethicist Jacob Appel argued in the Huffington Post that pregnant women who want to abort should be paid to gestate longer before terminating so that fetal organs could be harvested and used in transplant medicine. That would increase the number of abortions, he admitted, but he said a market in fetal organs could “bring solace to women who have already decided upon abortion, but desire that some additional social good come from the procedure.”
Bioethicist argued in the Huffington Post that pregnant women who want to abort should be paid to gestate longer before terminating so that fetal organs could be harvested and used in transplant medicine. That would increase the number of abortions, he admitted, but he said a could “bring solace to women who have already decided upon abortion, but desire that some additional social good come from the procedure.” Forcing caregivers to starve dementia patients: Prominent bioethicist Thaddeus Mason Pope (and others) want dementia patients to be allowed to instruct future caregivers to deny them spoon-feeding when they become incompetent. In such cases, they want caregivers to be legally bound to starve their patients to death . This would apply even if the patient willingly eats. In other words, starvation as the new “death with dignity.”
Prominent bioethicist Thaddeus Mason Pope (and others) want dementia patients to be allowed to instruct future caregivers to deny them spoon-feeding when they become incompetent. In such cases, they want caregivers to be . This would apply even if the patient willingly eats. In other words, starvation as the new “death with dignity.” Experimenting on cognitively disabled “non-persons”: Writing in the Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, bioethics bigwig Thomas Beauchamp opined that some cognitively disabled human beings should not be viewed as “persons, ” meaning that could “be treated in the same way we treat relevantly similar nonhumans. For example, they might be aggressively used as human research subjects and sources of organ s.”
Writing in the Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, bioethics bigwig Thomas Beauchamp opined that some ” meaning that could “be treated in the same way we treat relevantly similar nonhumans. For example, they might be aggressively used as s.” Transplanting organs of unconscious humans into animals: Several authors argued in the Journal of Medical Ethics — based at Oxford University, so it is not a tinfoil-hat internet site — that unconscious patients should be able to be used in xenotransplantation experiments — e.g. removing the human’s organs and replacing them with those of animals (usually pigs) . They write sickeningly, “As the autonomic and vegetative functions of PVS [permanent vegetative status] bodies can often be maintained for years, their use would allow the opportunity to fully test the long-term consequences of a solid organ xenotransplantation .”
Several authors argued in the Journal of Medical Ethics — based at Oxford University, so it is not a tinfoil-hat internet site — that unconscious patients should be able to be used in xenotransplantation experiments — e.g. . They write sickeningly, “As the autonomic and vegetative functions of PVS [permanent vegetative status] bodies can often be maintained for years, their use would allow the .” Harvesting hearts as a form of euthanasia: An advocacy article published in the Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation argued that patients who wish to be euthanized be killed by having their hearts removed for transplantation. The authors write that “ ‘living donation’ is the correct term to use, even though this is normally used for people who donate their kidney, and do not die as a result of donation.” Yes, indeed: Stripping a beating heart out of a patient’s body will be 100 percent fatal.
One would think that in the midst of an unprecedented pandemic, bioethicists would place their dehumanizing advocacy efforts at least on temporary hold. No such luck. The Journal of Medical Ethics just published a piece explicitly aimed at COVID-19 patients by the internationally prominent bioethicists and Oxford professors Julian Savulescu and Dominic Wilkinson. First, the authors want a license to permit seriously ill COVID-19 patients to be consensually experimented upon — even if the research is dangerous. From “Extreme Altruism in a Pandemic”:
Competent people now, or in the early phase of their illness when they retain competence, should be able to make advance directives for extreme altruism. This might take the form of consenting now to trials of dangerous drugs. They could also consent in advance to other interventional studies of significant risk, if they would imminently die.
That might seem reasonable — assuming the tests would be aimed at saving their lives. But the bioethicists want to include potentially lethal experimentation in the license that would not benefit the patient:
When a patient will certainly die [Smith: a sometimes mistaken diagnosis] they should be able to consent while competent to experimentation being performed on them for others, even if the experimentation may itself likely or possibly end their life sooner…. even if it would not benefit the patient and may even hasten their death.
The authors then boldly plunge even deeper into the utilitarian swamp to urge “organ donation euthanasia” of COVID-19 patients in places where hastening death by doctors is legal:
Organ donation euthanasia could possibly apply to some cases of COVID-19 where life prolonging medical treatment is either withdrawn or withheld. In those jurisdictions where euthanasia is legal (Netherlands, Belgium, etc), euthanasia could occur by surgical removal of vital organs under deep anaesthesia.
Savulescu and Wilkinson also want to allow experimentation on nursing home patients — even if they are not sick:
Some residents in nursing homes and care facilities are competent. Some of these may choose to take on significant risks in the war on COVID-19…. They could also be allowed to consent, with full disclosure of risks and no pressure, to take part in risky research which would accelerate the discovery of vaccines or treatments.
To prevent unwanted burdening of medical resources if the patient becomes ill, the authors would restrict the experimentation to patients who had “completed a living will indicating that they would not wish for invasive medical treatments in the event of becoming seriously unwell,” meaning nursing home patients could be intentionally infected with coronavirus and then, if they became seriously ill, simply allowed to die.
Meanwhile, back at the Hastings Center Report, bioethicist Larry R. Churchill — who is himself age 75 — advocates a type of duty to die upon the aged. From “On Being an Elder in a Pandemic”:
Does being elderly incur duties others do not have? I believe the answer is, yes, and foremost among these is an obligation for parsimonious use of newly scarce and expensive health care resources.
Here’s Churchill’s awful idea …
Award-winning author Wesley J. Smith is a chair of the Discovery Institute’s Center on Human Exceptionalism and a consultant to the Patients Rights Council.


thelibertybeacon--2020-07-10--Noshi Do: the art of alimentary self defence – the Vitamindee Kata

Here is the latest wisdom from the Noshi dojo , which teaches the noble art of Kung Food .
Very often an attacker such as a government or pharmaceutical crime syndicate will try to hit you with a low blow known as “ the pandemic ” followed by a flurry of jabs in order to subdue you and take liberties .
But there is an ancient easy-to-learn and easy-to-execute defence technique that you should know about as it provides a way of neatly side-stepping such an attack and blocking your opponent ’ s carefully aimed jabs .
It is known @ @ @ @ @ @ @ parlance you ’ ll hear it referred to as “ getting lots of vitamin D ” .
This is very ancient knowledge .
It was known for centuries by sensible people the world over and then almost lost when the planet descended into barbarism .
Barbarian hordes from the West have long sought to suppress all wisdom so as to make the population of the planet permanently slightly unwell so that they can be easily plundered , taken into slavery , forced to pay tributes to Bill Gates , Glaxo Smithkline and other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of what is often known as The Dazzling Wisdom of the Blindingly Obvious have kept the ancient knowledge safe and , known as the Noshi Do ( The Way of Food ) , it is now making a comeback in the hands of Warrior Nutritionists and other masters of alimentary self defence .
Here by way of illustration here are some recent articles that show the effectiveness of the Vitamindee for flowing chi into your immune system and neutralising such an attack .
Students of the Noshi Do should first study such wise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Are High in Vitamin D and 12 Ways to Get Your Daily Vitamin D – Health .
Noshi-Do : alimentary self defence .
How to Defend your Brain The above feature is from UKReloaded The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Flowing chi into your immune system
by Steve Cook
Konnichiwa!
Here is the latest wisdom from the Noshi dojo, which teaches the noble art of Kung Food.
Very often an attacker such as a government or pharmaceutical crime syndicate will try to hit you with a low blow known as “the pandemic” followed by a flurry of jabs in order to subdue you and take liberties.
But there is an ancient easy-to-learn and easy-to-execute defence technique that you should know about as it provides a way of neatly side-stepping such an attack and blocking your opponent’s carefully aimed jabs.
It is known as the Vitmandee Kata – in common parlance you’ll hear it referred to as “getting lots of vitamin D”.
This is very ancient knowledge. It was known for centuries by sensible people the world over and then almost lost when the planet descended into barbarism. Barbarian hordes from the West have long sought to suppress all wisdom so as to make the population of the planet permanently slightly unwell so that they can be easily plundered, taken into slavery, forced to pay tributes to Bill Gates, Glaxo Smithkline and other rapacious warlords etc.
However, repositories of what is often known as The Dazzling Wisdom of the Blindingly Obvious have kept the ancient knowledge safe and, known as the Noshi Do (The Way of Food), it is now making a comeback in the hands of Warrior Nutritionists and other masters of alimentary self defence.
Here by way of illustration here are some recent articles that show the effectiveness of the Vitamindee for flowing chi into your immune system and neutralising such an attack.
Students of the Noshi Do should first study such wise texts as, 9 Healthy Foods That Are High in Vitamin D and 12 Ways to Get Your Daily Vitamin D – Health.
Related article:
Noshi-Do: alimentary self defence. How to Defend your Brain
The above feature is from UKReloaded
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-07-10--Trump Threatens Tax-Exempt Status Of Leftist-Biased Colleges

In a series of tweets this morning , President Trump escalated his attacks on US universities by threatening the tax-exempt status of colleges that are too focused on “ Radical Left Indoctrination ” … ( Tyler Durden/ZH ) We look forward to the avalanche of “ this is hate ” tweet-ban demands , and the stampeded of college deans who will decry Trump ’ s clear “ white supremacist ” perspective ( when they themselves are kowtowing to a ‘ black supremacy ’ demanding mob ) .
Trump is right in the increasing level of liberal bias and indoctrination in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ earlier in the year , a recent Pew Research Center survey finds that only half of American adults think colleges and universities are having a positive effect on our nation .
The leftward political bias , held by faculty members affiliated with the Democratic Party , at most institutions of higher education explains a lot of that disappointment .
Professors Mitchell Langbert and Sean Stevens document this bias in “ Partisan Registration and Contributions of Faculty in Flagship Colleges.
” Langbert and Stevens conducted a new study of the political affiliation of 12,372 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two leading public colleges in 31 states .
• For party registration , they found a Democratic to Republican ( D : R ) ratio of 8.5:1 , which varied by rank of institution and region .
• For donations to political candidates ( using the Federal Election Commission database ) , they found a D : R ratio of 95:1 , with only 22 Republican donors , compared with 2,081 Democratic donors .
Several consistent findings have emerged from Langbert and Stevens ’ study .
The ratio of faculty who identify as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ almost always favors the Democratic Party .
Democratic professors outnumber their Republican counterparts most in the humanities and social sciences , compared with the natural sciences and engineering .
The ratio is 42:1 in anthropology , 27:1 in sociology and 27:1 in English .
In the social sciences , Democratic registered faculty outnumber their Republican counterparts the least in economics 3:1 .
The partisan political slant is most extreme at the most highly rated institutions .
The leftist bias at our colleges and universities has many harmful effects .
Let ’ s look @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of California , Davis , last month , a mathematics professor faced considerable backlash over her opposition to the requirement for faculty “ diversity statements.
” • University of California , San Diego , requires job applicants to admit to the “ barriers ” preventing women and minorities from full participation in campus life .
• At American University , a history professor recently wrote a book in which he advocates repealing the Second Amendment .
• A Rutgers University professor said , “ Watching the Iowa Caucus is a sickening display of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of California , Berkeley , professor and former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich chimed in to say : “ Think about this : Iowa is 90.7 % white .
Iowa is now the only state with a lifetime voting ban for people with a felony conviction .
Black people make up 4 % of Iowa ’ s population but 26 % of the prison population .
How is this representative of our electorate ?
” • A Williams College professor said he would advocate for social justice to be included in math textbooks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no longer have to take a single math course to graduate ; however , they may soon be required to take a diversity course .
Then there ’ s a question about loyalty to our nation .
Charles Lieber , former chairman of the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Harvard , was arrested earlier this year on accusations that he made a materially false , fictitious and fraudulent statement about work he did for a program run by the Chinese government that seeks to lure American talent to China .
He @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up to $ 158,000 in living expenses for his work , which involved cultivating young teachers and students , according to court documents .
According to the Department of Justice , Lieber helped China “ cultivate high-level scientific talent in furtherance of China ’ s scientific development , economic prosperity and national security.
” • Newly found court records reveal that Emory University neuroscientist Li Xiao-Jiang was fired in late 2019 after being charged with lying about his own ties to China .
Li was part of the same Chinese program as Lieber @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of California , Los Angeles , professor guilty of exporting stolen U.S. military technology to China .
Newsweek reported that he was convicted June 26 on 18 federal charges .
• Meanwhile , NBC reported that federal prosecutors say that University of Texas professor Bo Mao attempted to steal U.S. technology by using his position as a professor to obtain access to protected circuitry and then handing it over to the Chinese telecommunications giant , Huawei .
( TLB ) published this article as compiled , commented on and published by Tyler Durden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Liberty Beacon : University of Virginia to Blame for Racial Intolerance Lisa Page To Teach College Course at Harvard University

Trump Threatens Tax-Exempt Status Of Leftist-Biased Colleges
“Our Children Should Be Educated, Not Indoctrinated”
In a series of tweets this morning, President Trump escalated his attacks on US universities by threatening the tax-exempt status of colleges that are too focused on “Radical Left Indoctrination”…
… and/or Funding, which will be taken away if this Propaganda or Act Against Public Policy continues. Our children must be Educated, not Indoctrinated! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 10, 2020
(Tyler Durden/ZH) We look forward to the avalanche of “this is hate” tweet-ban demands, and the stampeded of college deans who will decry Trump’s clear “white supremacist” perspective (when they themselves are kowtowing to a ‘black supremacy’ demanding mob).
Trump is right in the increasing level of liberal bias and indoctrination in American Colleges.
As Walter Williams wrote earlier in the year, a recent Pew Research Center survey finds that only half of American adults think colleges and universities are having a positive effect on our nation. The leftward political bias, held by faculty members affiliated with the Democratic Party, at most institutions of higher education explains a lot of that disappointment. Professors Mitchell Langbert and Sean Stevens document this bias in “Partisan Registration and Contributions of Faculty in Flagship Colleges.”
Langbert and Stevens conducted a new study of the political affiliation of 12,372 professors in the two leading private and two leading public colleges in 31 states.
For party registration, they found a Democratic to Republican (D:R) ratio of 8.5:1 , which varied by rank of institution and region.
, which varied by rank of institution and region. For donations to political candidates (using the Federal Election Commission database), they found a D:R ratio of 95:1, with only 22 Republican donors, compared with 2,081 Democratic donors.
Several consistent findings have emerged from Langbert and Stevens’ study. The ratio of faculty who identify as or are registered as Democratic versus Republican almost always favors the Democratic Party. Democratic professors outnumber their Republican counterparts most in the humanities and social sciences, compared with the natural sciences and engineering.
The ratio is 42:1 in anthropology, 27:1 in sociology and 27:1 in English. In the social sciences, Democratic registered faculty outnumber their Republican counterparts the least in economics 3:1. The partisan political slant is most extreme at the most highly rated institutions.
The leftist bias at our colleges and universities has many harmful effects. Let’s look at a few.
At University of California, Davis, last month, a mathematics professor faced considerable backlash over her opposition to the requirement for faculty “diversity statements.”
University of California, San Diego, requires job applicants to admit to the “barriers” preventing women and minorities from full participation in campus life.
At American University, a history professor recently wrote a book in which he advocates repealing the Second Amendment.
A Rutgers University professor said, “Watching the Iowa Caucus is a sickening display of the over-representation of whiteness.”
University of California, Berkeley, professor and former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich chimed in to say: “Think about this: Iowa is 90.7% white. Iowa is now the only state with a lifetime voting ban for people with a felony conviction. Black people make up 4% of Iowa’s population but 26% of the prison population. How is this representative of our electorate?”
A Williams College professor said he would advocate for social justice to be included in math textbooks .
. Students at Wayne State University no longer have to take a single math course to graduate; however, they may soon be required to take a diversity course.
Then there’s a question about loyalty to our nation.
Charles Lieber, former chairman of the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Harvard, was arrested earlier this year on accusations that he made a materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statement about work he did for a program run by the Chinese government that seeks to lure American talent to China.
He was paid $50,000 a month and up to $158,000 in living expenses for his work, which involved cultivating young teachers and students, according to court documents. According to the Department of Justice, Lieber helped China “cultivate high-level scientific talent in furtherance of China’s scientific development, economic prosperity and national security.”
It’s not just Harvard professors.
Newly found court records reveal that Emory University neuroscientist Li Xiao-Jiang was fired in late 2019 after being charged with lying about his own ties to China. Li was part of the same Chinese program as Lieber.
A jury found a University of California, Los Angeles, professor guilty of exporting stolen U.S. military technology to China. Newsweek reported that he was convicted June 26 on 18 federal charges.
Meanwhile, NBC reported that federal prosecutors say that University of Texas professor Bo Mao attempted to steal U.S. technology by using his position as a professor to obtain access to protected circuitry and then handing it over to the Chinese telecommunications giant, Huawei.
The true tragedy is that so many Americans are blind to the fact that today’s colleges and universities pose a threat on several fronts to the well-being of our nation.
**********
(TLB) published this article as compiled, commented on and published by Tyler Durden at ZeroHedge.com
More about Universities from The Liberty Beacon:
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …


thelibertybeacon--2020-07-10--NYC mayor bans ‘large events’ through end of September – except BLM protests

NYC mayor bans ‘ large events ’ through end of September – except BLM protests FILE PHOTO : New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio speaks at a public memorial in Brooklyn , June 4 , 2020 ( RT-USA News ) New York Mayor Bill de Blasio has banned all large public events for the next three months , citing the Covid-19 pandemic – only to make a belated exception for Black Lives Matter rallies , incensing Americans far outside the city .
Mayor Bill de Blasio , third from left , participates in painting Black Lives Matter on Fifth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Thursday , July 9 , 2020 , in New York .
The mayor ’ s wife , Chirlane McCray , is fourth from left and Rev .
Al Sharpton is second from left .
Fresh from painting a giant “ Black Lives Matter ” mural on Fifth Avenue in front of Trump Tower , the mayor took to CNN to expand on his office ’ s order to cancel all large gatherings through September 30 on Thursday .
But when host Wolf Blitzer asked him about “ protests , ” de Blasio couldn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s pandering even further .
“ We understand , at this moment in history , people are talking about the need for historic changes… this is a historic moment of change , ” de Blasio said redundantly , even while consigning outdoor concerts and parades to the distant future .
No public gatherings larger than a city block will be granted a permit , the mayor announced in a statement published to his administration ’ s website earlier on Thursday .
However , he appeared to draw a clear distinction between “ the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to , the parades , the fairs , ” which “ we just can ’ t have that while we ’ re focusing on health right now ” – and “ recognizing the power and the meaning of the message Black Lives Matter , which we did in front of Trump Tower today.
” Perhaps unsurprisingly , the egregious double standard raised hackles far outside New York .
Conservative gadfly Mike Cernovich suggested the mayor ’ s declaration might be fodder for a lucrative First Amendment lawsuit .
“ Siri , give me @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a first amendment lawsuit brought against New York City.
” Get a load of this jack ass : You CAN ’ T have a parade to honor veteran ’ s who gave their lives for your right to protest , just yet– but you can have a Black Lives Matter protest out of sensitivity to honor this part of our history .
The Daily Caller tweeted CNN ’ s video – here ’ s how Twitter responded to de Blasio telling Blitzer that the city will ban all large gatherings except for Black @ @ @ @ @ @ @ skeptical that some of the summer ’ s largest gatherings – including Brooklyn ’ s notorious West Indian Day Parade , which features extravagant costumes and frenetic music and is often accompanied by violence – would go quietly into the night just because de Blasio said so .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

NYC mayor bans ‘large events’ through end of September – except BLM protests
FILE PHOTO: New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio speaks at a public memorial in Brooklyn, June 4, 2020 © Reuters / Andrew Kelly
(RT-USA News) New York Mayor Bill de Blasio has banned all large public events for the next three months, citing the Covid-19 pandemic – only to make a belated exception for Black Lives Matter rallies, incensing Americans far outside the city.
.
Mayor Bill de Blasio, third from left, participates in painting Black Lives Matter on Fifth Avenue in front of Trump Tower, Thursday, July 9, 2020, in New York. The mayor’s wife, Chirlane McCray, is fourth from left and Rev. Al Sharpton is second from left. MARK LENNIHAN / AP
Fresh from painting a giant “Black Lives Matter” mural on Fifth Avenue in front of Trump Tower, the mayor took to CNN to expand on his office’s order to cancel all large gatherings through September 30 on Thursday. But when host Wolf Blitzer asked him about “protests,” de Blasio couldn’t resist taking the day’s pandering even further.
“We understand, at this moment in history, people are talking about the need for historic changes… this is a historic moment of change,” de Blasio said redundantly, even while consigning outdoor concerts and parades to the distant future. No public gatherings larger than a city block will be granted a permit, the mayor announced in a statement published to his administration’s website earlier on Thursday. However, he appeared to draw a clear distinction between “the kind of gatherings we’re used to, the parades, the fairs,” which “we just can’t have that while we’re focusing on health right now” – and “recognizing the power and the meaning of the message Black Lives Matter, which we did in front of Trump Tower today.” Perhaps unsurprisingly, the egregious double standard raised hackles far outside New York. Conservative gadfly Mike Cernovich suggested the mayor’s declaration might be fodder for a lucrative First Amendment lawsuit. “Siri, give me a smoking gun exhibit to include in a first amendment lawsuit brought against New York City.” Siri: I have your answer. https://t.co/rylTaGA5Ke — Cernovich (@Cernovich) July 9, 2020 #BeBESTorDieTrying @chesleydohl Get a load of this jack ass: You CAN’T have a parade to honor veteran’s who gave their lives for your right to protest, just yet– but you can have a Black Lives Matter protest out of sensitivity to honor this part of our history.
Deblasio’s dead serious. Disgusting.
The Daily Caller tweeted CNN’s video – here’s how Twitter responded to de Blasio telling Blitzer that the city will ban all large gatherings except for Black Lives Matter protests:
A few were skeptical that some of the summer’s largest gatherings – including Brooklyn’s notorious West Indian Day Parade, which features extravagant costumes and frenetic music and is often accompanied by violence – would go quietly into the night just because de Blasio said so.
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-07-10--Corporations Hyping BLM Fail Us in Every Other Way

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright @ @ @ @ @ @ @ opinions shared are for informational purposes only including , but not limited to , text , graphics , images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction .
Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice , diagnosis or treatment .

••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-07-10--Virus Unrest: Serbs Protest Being Lied To [Video]

Virus Unrest Turns Violent As Serbs Protest Being “ Lied To For Political Ends ” Social unrest has rocked Belgrade and other cities in Serbia this week in response to President Aleksandar Vucic ’ s reintroduction of government curfews over surging coronavirus cases .
Serbian police fired tear gas and were dressed head to toe in riot gear , as demonstrators , mostly young people , assaulted police on Tuesday and Wednesday .
The New York Times said the unrest was some of the first in Europe since the pandemic began – also indicating the severity of the unrest was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the 1990s .
Young Serbs quickly took the streets on Tuesday after Vucic announced Belgrade would be placed under a new order restricting movement in the region for three days to mitigate the spread of the second coronavirus wave .
Many were infuriated by the re-implementation of the lockdown after coming out of some of the strictest ones in Europe to allow the general election last week .
“ We don ’ t mind staying home for another three days — that wasn ’ t the problem , ” said Dragana Grncarski @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this week .
“ Citizens have been constantly deceived and lied to for political ends , ” said Tena Prelec , a political expert on Southeast Europe at the University of Oxford .
Jelena Vasiljevic , an expert on Balkan unrest at the University of Belgrade , said the expiration of the lockdowns for election purposes – then re-implementation of the lockdowns took the population “ from one extreme to another.
” Vasiljevic said the “ excessive use of force ” by the government to combat rioters hasn ’ t been seen since @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or 1997.
” Milosevic led Serbia through the Balkan Wars and was later charged for war crimes .
Serbian Defense Minister Aleksandar Vulin was convinced the demonstration against the re-implementation of the lockdowns in Belgrade and other cities were “ carefully planned ” – and aimed at igniting a civil war .
“ We have terrible violence on the streets , we have an attempt at a coup , we have an attempt to seize power by force and an attempt to provoke a civil war in Serbia .
It can not be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no reason , there is no reason to set fire to the Assembly , to set fire to the City Hall in Novi Sad , to attack the police , to beat people on the streets , to endanger life and to endanger the property of Serbian citizens , ” said Vulin , a guest on the show Novo jutro on TV Pink , was asked to comment on the events in the previous two evenings .
Russian Times caught some of the unrest on video earlier this week .
Young Serbs can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ front of government buildings .
“ There were indications of foreign involvement , and some criminal faces were there , too , ” Vucic said on Wednesday afternoon .
He added that virus cases will likely flare-up because of the mass unrest .
Vucic has also backtracked on the curfew after several days of unrest – instead , the government is expected to impose restrictions on public spaces and possibly limit business hours .
There ’ s also talk of fining people for not wearing masks .
When it comes to outside forces @ @ @ @ @ @ @ came out on Thursday , denying it had any involvement .
( TLB ) published this article from ZeroHedge as compiled by Tyler Durden The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues @ @ @ @ @ @ @ distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Virus Unrest Turns Violent As Serbs Protest Being “Lied To For Political Ends”
Social unrest has rocked Belgrade and other cities in Serbia this week in response to President Aleksandar Vucic’s reintroduction of government curfews over surging coronavirus cases.
(ZeroHedge)
Serbian police fired tear gas and were dressed head to toe in riot gear, as demonstrators, mostly young people, assaulted police on Tuesday and Wednesday. The New York Times said the unrest was some of the first in Europe since the pandemic began – also indicating the severity of the unrest was worst since the rule of Slobodan Milosevic in the 1990s.
The Capitals. [EPA-EFE/KOCA SULEJMANOVIC]
Young Serbs quickly took the streets on Tuesday after Vucic announced Belgrade would be placed under a new order restricting movement in the region for three days to mitigate the spread of the second coronavirus wave. Many were infuriated by the re-implementation of the lockdown after coming out of some of the strictest ones in Europe to allow the general election last week.
“We don’t mind staying home for another three days — that wasn’t the problem,” said Dragana Grncarski, 45, who has been protesting this week.
“However, they’re playing with our minds and with the truth,” Grncarski added. “When it suits them to do elections, there is no corona. They organized football matches and tennis matches, and because of that we have a situation where the hospitals are full.”
“Citizens have been constantly deceived and lied to for political ends,” said Tena Prelec, a political expert on Southeast Europe at the University of Oxford.
BREAKING – All hell breaking loose in Serbia’s Belgrade amid protests over the government’s handling of #COVID19 for the second day.pic.twitter.com/3JnxJG3BiJ — Disclose.tv 🚨 (@disclosetv) July 8, 2020
Jelena Vasiljevic, an expert on Balkan unrest at the University of Belgrade, said the expiration of the lockdowns for election purposes – then re-implementation of the lockdowns took the population “from one extreme to another.”
Vasiljevic said the “excessive use of force” by the government to combat rioters hasn’t been seen since the days of “Milosevic in 1996 or 1997.” Milosevic led Serbia through the Balkan Wars and was later charged for war crimes.
Demonstrators stormed the Serbian parliament building in Belgrade after President Aleksandar Vucic announced stricter measures, including the lockdown of the capital, over the weekend to halt the spread of the coronavirus https://t.co/dFlIVgyOkG pic.twitter.com/3E24L77ftv — Reuters (@Reuters) July 8, 2020
Serbian Defense Minister Aleksandar Vulin was convinced the demonstration against the re-implementation of the lockdowns in Belgrade and other cities were “carefully planned” – and aimed at igniting a civil war.
“We have terrible violence on the streets, we have an attempt at a coup, we have an attempt to seize power by force and an attempt to provoke a civil war in Serbia. It cannot be described and explained differently. There is no reason, there is no reason to set fire to the Assembly, to set fire to the City Hall in Novi Sad, to attack the police, to beat people on the streets, to endanger life and to endanger the property of Serbian citizens ,” said Vulin, a guest on the show Novo jutro on TV Pink, was asked to comment on the events in the previous two evenings.
Russian Times caught some of the unrest on video earlier this week. Young Serbs can be seen clashing with riot police in front of government buildings.
“There were indications of foreign involvement, and some criminal faces were there, too,” Vucic said on Wednesday afternoon. He added that virus cases will likely flare-up because of the mass unrest.
“I wonder who will be responsible for the fact that hundreds and thousands of people became infected yesterday and the day before yesterday,” he said
Vucic has also backtracked on the curfew after several days of unrest – instead, the government is expected to impose restrictions on public spaces and possibly limit business hours. There’s also talk of fining people for not wearing masks.
When it comes to outside forces meddling in Serb domestic affairs, Russia came out on Thursday, denying it had any involvement.
*********
(TLB) published this article from ZeroHedge as compiled by Tyler Durden
Pictorial content placement edited and added by (TLB) editors
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-07-10--KEN’S CORNER: John Adams Encouragement Rings In the Heart Of America

KEN ’ S CORNER : John Adams Encouragement Rings In the Heart of America As America sits on the rim of the most important election in our lifetime , perhaps we can find solace by looking at what one of our founding fathers tried to tell us .
Perhaps he can rekindle an idea that seemed most important , as they also sat on the rim , with everything , even their own life hanging in the balance .
Our founders knew all too well the power of dictatorship , of an oligarchy , repression , subjugation , and worst @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
What these men are telling us , from the very grave , is indeed applicable to what we are experiencing today .
Some of us who perceive the dangers ahead of us , where civil liberties and our Constitution are being shredded from certain segments of unaccountable government , are just a few of many challenges we face from every side .
I tell you this with the most profound and sincere voice I can muster : We have enemies at the gates , and traitors who want to open them .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a national debt that has gone from 6 trillion to well over 20 trillion in just over ten years ?
How can this be allowed ?
We have leaders who are bought and paid for by international or corporate ( Big Pharma ) interests looking to make profit , and we have no ability to challenge this by clearly defined Constitutional Law .
We have so called leadership who conspire , and divert attention from their hidden agendas , by creating false-flags , the spreading of lies and media propaganda , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bigotry , hatred and prejudice , all horrors we have tried so hard to overcome as a nation .
And as these issues are reintroduced by our leadership , we fight each other instead of holding them accountable for their treachery .
It is called divide and conquer , and it is very profitable .
To survive this , we must ask introspective , powerful and rational questions , and try to come together as one nation .
Primarily , a singular question seems to rise to the surface : Who are we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be slaves begging for crumbs from the master ’ s table ?
Are we cowards who let men steal our national resources , so hidden from view they are above the law ?
Are we blind to the destruction of our civil liberties , that our forefathers died to give us ?
Are we to allow men with duel-citizenship to choose our president , rig our elections , and destroy our Constitutional Republic based on law ?
Our country , our America , so dear to our hearts , has been slipping from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for a hundred years… and hindsight is the only measure we have to determine both worth and hope .
There , in the folds of time , we can see what we were hoped to be , and so visualize what we have become .
We can have no future as a Democratic Republic , without this understanding .
We must seek truth .
Men of indomitable will and sound principle explained to us something so profound , it seems that it can only be whispered in America today : Civil Liberty , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the heavens !
Liberty is not granted by government , it comes to us from God !
It is our God-given right .
By their insight , they gave us A Declaration of Independence , a Constitution and a Bill of Rights , with trembling hands .
At the Constitutional Convention , an obscure woman asked Benjamin Franklin whether the Constitution established a republic or monarchy .
He said to her : “ A republic , madam , if you can keep it.
” Below are John Adam ’ s words .
They @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they lit the minds of men who knew oppression , first hand .
They were meant to encourage his fellow assemblymen to sign the Declaration of Independence , though there were others emphatically opposed to it .
These words were taken from John McCullough ’ s biography on John Adams , and they should split the hearts of every single American with both pride and hope .
We are Americans !
The greatest social experiment the world has ever witnessed , and the blood and honor of those brave men still course through @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Not give up hope !
The truth of what they stood for is ultimate , and can not be denied .
It is mirrored in the truth we hold in our hearts , and is self-evident .
Liberty , is our manifest destiny .
“ Objects of the most stupendous magnitude .
Mirrors which will affect the lives of millions , born and unborn are now before us .
We must expect a great expense of blood and pain , but we must always remember that a free constitution of civil government can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rate as there is nothing on this side of Jerusalem of greater importance to mankind .
My worthy colleague from Pennsylvania has spoken with great ingenuity and eloquence .
He has given you a grim prognostication of our national future , but where he foresees apocalypse , I see hope .
I see a new nation ready to take its place in the world , not an empire , but a republic and a republic of laws , not men .
Gentlemen , we are in the very midst of revolution , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the history of the world .
How few of the human race have ever had an opportunity for choosing a system of government for themselves and for their children ?
I am not without apprehensions gentlemen , but the end we have in sight is more than worth all the means .
My belief says that the hour has come , my judgment approves this measure and my whole heart is in it .
All that I have , all that I am and all that I that I hope in this life @ @ @ @ @ @ @ upon it .
While I live , let me have a country .
A free country !
” John Adams — 1776 From the Author , Ken LaRive – We in the Liberty movement have been fighting to take back this country for less than a decade , peacefully and with the love of God and country in our hearts .
Our banner has been trampled on and displaced by a multitude of distractions , further eroding our nation and the cause for Liberty .
And so , as we are pulled by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ entities with unlimited resources stolen from our future , unaccountable trillions printed out of thin air and put on our backs as debt , we must formulate the most pitiful of all questions any patriot might ask in the final hour : Are we going to fight for our master ’ s tyranny , or are we going to demand the return of our civil liberties and Constitution ?
Are we going to choose The Banner of Liberty , or the shackles of voluntary servitude ?
Will it be a war for corporate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our ability to self govern , as the blood and toil of our forefathers presented to us , their children , as a gift ?
I fear that decision is emanate .
I fear that any decision will be a hard one , but my greatest fear of all is that the decision has already been made for us .

KEN’S CORNER: John Adams Encouragement Rings In the Heart of America
By TLB Contributing Writer: Ken LaRive
As we sit together as a nation on the rim of a slippery abyss, we pause for a moment to look behind us, for solace. Some of us who perceive the dangers ahead are asking both powerful and rational questions, and are beginning to realize full well the profound and painful answer: Who were we, and what have we become?
Our country, so dear to our hearts, is slipping from our grasp, and hindsight is the only measure we have to determine both worth and hope.
Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson…
Men of indomitable will and sound principle explained to us something so profound, it seems that it can only be whispered in America today: Liberty, is God given. Scream it to the heavens! Liberty is not granted by government, it comes to us from God!
By candle light, they gave us A Decoration of Independence, a Constitution, and a Bill of Rights, with trembling hands.
At the Constitutional Convention an obscure woman approached Benjamin Franklin and asked whether the Constitution established a republic or monarchy. He said to her: “A republic, madam, if you can keep it.”
Below this commentary are John Adam’s final words there, meant to encourage his fellow assemblymen to sign of the Declaration of Independence, though there were others emphatically opposed to it. These words were taken from John McCullough’s biography on John Adams, and they should split the hearts of every single American with both pride and hope.
We are Americans! The greatest social experiment the world has ever witnessed, and the blood and honor of those brave men still course through our veins!
Do not, do Not give up hope! The truth of what they stood for is ultimate, and cannot be denied. It is mirrored in the truth of Ron Paul, the Thomas Jefferson of our age. He opened our minds, and freed our American spirit. He displaced apathy with hope, and just as our founding fathers knew emphatically… once understood, there is no turning back.
This is why a person who finally reaches Ron Paul, realizes that there is no higher place to go. All others of this time will be mere footnotes in history, but Ron Paul’s words will ring true in America forever. He holds before us a mirror, a mirror of truth.
••••
As Jefferson finished his speech, John Adams stood up… “Objects of the most stupendous magnitude. Mirrors which will affect the lives of millions, born and unborn are now before us. We must expect a great expense of blood and pain, but we must always remember that a free constitution of civil government cannot be purchased at too dear a rate as there is nothing on this side of Jerusalem of greater importance to mankind. My worthy colleague from Pennsylvania has spoken with great ingenuity and eloquence. He has given you a grim prognostication of our national future, but where he foresees apocalypse, I see hope. I see a new nation ready to take its place in the world, not an empire, but a republic and a republic of laws, not men. Gentlemen, we are in the very midst of revolution, the most complete, unexpected and remarkable in the history of the world. How few of the human race have ever had an opportunity for choosing a system of government for themselves and for their children? I am not without apprehensions gentlemen, but the end we have in sight is more than worth all the means. My belief says that the hour has come, my judgment approves this measure and my whole heart is in it. All that I have, all that I am and all that I that I hope in this life, I am now ready to stake upon it. While I live, let me have a country. A free country!” John Adams — 1776
••••
God Bless America!
••••
•••• More great articles by Ken LaRive ••••
From the Author, Ken LaRive – We in the Liberty movement have been fighting to take back this country for less than a decade, peacefully and with the love of God and country in our hearts. Our banner has been trampled on and displaced by a multitude of distractions, further eroding our nation and the cause for Liberty. And so, as we are pulled by forces we cannot fathom, powerful entities with unlimited resources stolen from our future, unaccountable trillions printed out of thin air and put on our backs as debt, we must formulate the most pitiful of all questions any patriot might ask in the final hour: Are we going to fight for our master’s tyranny, or are we going to demand the return of our civil liberties and Constitution? Are we going to choose The Banner of Liberty, or the shackles of voluntary servitude? Will it be a war for corporate profit, or a war to regain our ability to self govern, as the blood and toil of our forefathers presented to us, their children, as a gift? I fear that decision is emanate. I fear that any decision will be a hard one, but my greatest fear of all is that the decision has already been made for us. More information about Ken LaRive.
••••
Click on the image below to visit site:
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.