thelibertybeacon--2020-07-28--The Ultimate Divide and Conquer Is Upon Us

Western civilization , led by the US government and media , has embarked upon a campaign of mass psychological terrorism designed to cover for the collapsing economy , set up a new pretext for Wall Street ’ s ongoing plunder expedition , radically escalate the police state , deeply traumatize people into submission to total social conformity , and radically aggravate the anti-social , anti-human atomization of the people .
The pretext for this abomination is an epidemic which objectively is comparable to the seasonal flu and is caused by the same kind of Coronavirus we ’ ve endured so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The global evidence is converging on the facts : This flu is somewhat more contagious than the norm and is especially dangerous for those who are aged and already in poor health from pre-existing maladies .
It is not especially dangerous for the rest of the population .
The whole concept of “ lockdowns ” is exactly upside down , exactly the wrong way any sane society would respond to this circumstance .
It ’ s the vulnerable who should be shielded while nature takes its course among the general population , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Dominionist-technocratic rigidity can ’ t prevent an epidemic from cycling through the population in spite of the delusions of that religion , especially since Western societies began their measures far too late anyway .
So it ’ s best to let herd immunity develop as fast as it naturally will , at which time the virus recedes from lack of hosts ( and is likely to mutate in a milder direction along the way ) .
This is the only way to bring a safer environment for all including the most vulnerable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rejected the sane , scientific route in favor of doomed-to-fail attempts at a forcible violent segregation and sterilization is proof that governments aren ’ t concerned with the public health ( as if we didn ’ t know that already from a thousand policies of poisoning the environment while gutting the health care system ) , but are very ardent to use this crisis they artificially generated in order to radically escalate their police state power toward totalitarian goals .
The whole concept of self-isolation and anti-social “ distancing ” is radically anti-human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be social creatures living in tight-knit groups .
Although modern societies ideologically and socioeconomically work to massify ( ER : to steer us toward mass activity such as mass production and consumption instead of activity based on individuality ) and atomize people , nevertheless almost all of us still seek close human companionship in our lives .
This terror campaign seeks to blast to pieces any remaining human closeness , which means any remaining humanity as such , the better to isolate individual atoms for subjection to total domination .
Arendt wrote @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , though even she didn ’ t envision a state-driven cult of the literal physical repulsion of every atom from every other atom .
So far , the people are submitting completely to a terror campaign dedicated to the total eradication of whatever community was left in the world , and especially whatever community was starting to be rebuilt .
Some dream of this terror campaign somehow bringing about a magical collective transformation .
They don ’ t explain how that is supposed to happen when everyone ’ s so terrorized they ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ own shadows , let alone physically come together with other people .
Any kind of political or social action , any kind of movement-building , requires close person-to-person contact .
It seems that for most erstwhile self-alleged dissidents , the fact that social media is no substitute for face-to-face organizing and group action , a fact hitherto universally acknowledged by these dissidents , is another truth suddenly to be jettisoned and replaced by its complete antithesis .
Thus the terror campaign is a virus causing those it infects to abdicate all activism and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for as long as they remain insane with the fever of this propaganda terror .
Far more profoundly and evoking despair , the terror campaign is a virus causing those it infects to fear and loathe all human contact , all companionship , all closeness , all things which ever made us human in the first place .
Prior totalitarian regimes sought this lack of contact and trust through networks of informers .
These networks are part of today ’ s terror campaign as well , encouraged from above and spontaneously arising from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of terror as well as the exercise of prior petty-evil intentions on the part of petty-evil individuals .
But today ’ s totalitarian potential is far worse than this .
Now the regimes aspiring to total domination have terrorized and brainwashed the vast majority of people into an automatic physical distrust of all other people .
One no longer fears that someone is an informer , but fears the very existence of another human being .
Any kind of human relations , from personal friendship and romance to friendly social gatherings and clubs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ under such circumstances .
This threatens to be the end of the very concept of shared humanity , to be replaced by an anthill of slave atoms with no consciousness beyond fear and the most animal concern for food and shelter , which already is allowed or denied in the same way experimenters do with lab rats .
And the more people fear and loathe the literal physical existence of all other people , the more the situation becomes ripe for every epidemic of murder , from the spiking rate of domestic violence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pogroms to Nazi-style extermination campaigns .
This is the system ’ s end goal .
It ’ s the logical end where every trend of today leads .
All of it is trumped up over an epidemic which objectively is a flu season somewhat rougher than average .
Why do the people want to surrender and throw away all reality and future prospect of shared humanity , happiness , freedom , well-being , over so little ?
Is this really a terminal totalitarian death cult , the globe as one massive Jonestown ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ what the majority wants .
If they don ’ t really want this consummation of universal death in spirit , emotion and body , they ’ d better snap out of their terror-induced mental delirium fast , before it ’ s too late .
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com

The Ultimate Divide and Conquer
RUSS BANGS
It has frequently been observed that terror can rule absolutely only over people who are isolated against each other and that therefore one of the primary concerns of tyrannical government is to bring this isolation about. Isolation may be the beginning of terror; it certainly is its most fertile ground; it always is its result. This isolation is, as it were, pre-totalitarian; its hallmark is impotence insofar as power always comes from people acting together, acting in concert; isolated people are powerless by definition.”
Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism
Western civilization, led by the US government and media, has embarked upon a campaign of mass psychological terrorism designed to cover for the collapsing economy, set up a new pretext for Wall Street’s ongoing plunder expedition, radically escalate the police state, deeply traumatize people into submission to total social conformity, and radically aggravate the anti-social, anti-human atomization of the people.
The pretext for this abomination is an epidemic which objectively is comparable to the seasonal flu and is caused by the same kind of Coronavirus we’ve endured so long without totalitarian rampages and mass insanity.
The global evidence is converging on the facts: This flu is somewhat more contagious than the norm and is especially dangerous for those who are aged and already in poor health from pre-existing maladies. It is not especially dangerous for the rest of the population.
The whole concept of “lockdowns” is exactly upside down, exactly the wrong way any sane society would respond to this circumstance.
It’s the vulnerable who should be shielded while nature takes its course among the general population, who should go about life as usual. Dominionist-technocratic rigidity can’t prevent an epidemic from cycling through the population in spite of the delusions of that religion, especially since Western societies began their measures far too late anyway.
So it’s best to let herd immunity develop as fast as it naturally will, at which time the virus recedes from lack of hosts (and is likely to mutate in a milder direction along the way). This is the only way to bring a safer environment for all including the most vulnerable.
The fact that most societies have rejected the sane, scientific route in favor of doomed-to-fail attempts at a forcible violent segregation and sterilization is proof that governments aren’t concerned with the public health (as if we didn’t know that already from a thousand policies of poisoning the environment while gutting the health care system), but are very ardent to use this crisis they artificially generated in order to radically escalate their police state power toward totalitarian goals.
The whole concept of self-isolation and anti-social “distancing” is radically anti-human. We evolved over millions of years to be social creatures living in tight-knit groups. Although modern societies ideologically and socioeconomically work to massify (ER: to steer us toward mass activity such as mass production and consumption instead of activity based on individuality) and atomize people, nevertheless almost all of us still seek close human companionship in our lives.
(I suspect most of the internet police-state-mongers are not only fascists at heart but are confirmed misanthropic loners who couldn’t care less about human closeness.)
This terror campaign seeks to blast to pieces any remaining human closeness, which means any remaining humanity as such, the better to isolate individual atoms for subjection to total domination. Arendt wrote profoundly on this goal of totalitarian governments, though even she didn’t envision a state-driven cult of the literal physical repulsion of every atom from every other atom.
So far, the people are submitting completely to a terror campaign dedicated to the total eradication of whatever community was left in the world, and especially whatever community was starting to be rebuilt.
Some dream of this terror campaign somehow bringing about a magical collective transformation. They don’t explain how that is supposed to happen when everyone’s so terrorized they’re desperate to detach physically from their own shadows, let alone physically come together with other people. Any kind of political or social action, any kind of movement-building, requires close person-to-person contact.
It seems that for most erstwhile self-alleged dissidents, the fact that social media is no substitute for face-to-face organizing and group action, a fact hitherto universally acknowledged by these dissidents, is another truth suddenly to be jettisoned and replaced by its complete antithesis.
Thus the terror campaign is a virus causing those it infects to abdicate all activism and all prospect for all future activism, for as long as they remain insane with the fever of this propaganda terror.
Far more profoundly and evoking despair, the terror campaign is a virus causing those it infects to fear and loathe all human contact, all companionship, all closeness, all things which ever made us human in the first place. Prior totalitarian regimes sought this lack of contact and trust through networks of informers.
These networks are part of today’s terror campaign as well, encouraged from above and spontaneously arising from below as a result of the feeling of terror as well as the exercise of prior petty-evil intentions on the part of petty-evil individuals.
But today’s totalitarian potential is far worse than this. Now the regimes aspiring to total domination have terrorized and brainwashed the vast majority of people into an automatic physical distrust of all other people. One no longer fears that someone is an informer, but fears the very existence of another human being.
Any kind of human relations, from personal friendship and romance to friendly social gatherings and clubs to social and cultural movements become impossible under such circumstances. This threatens to be the end of the very concept of shared humanity, to be replaced by an anthill of slave atoms with no consciousness beyond fear and the most animal concern for food and shelter, which already is allowed or denied in the same way experimenters do with lab rats.
And the more people fear and loathe the literal physical existence of all other people, the more the situation becomes ripe for every epidemic of murder, from the spiking rate of domestic violence and killings to incipient lynch mobs to pogroms to Nazi-style extermination campaigns.
This is the system’s end goal. It’s the logical end where every trend of today leads. All of it is trumped up over an epidemic which objectively is a flu season somewhat rougher than average.
Why do the people want to surrender and throw away all reality and future prospect of shared humanity, happiness, freedom, well-being, over so little? Is this really a terminal totalitarian death cult, the globe as one massive Jonestown?
So far, it seems this is what the majority wants. If they don’t really want this consummation of universal death in spirit, emotion and body, they’d better snap out of their terror-induced mental delirium fast, before it’s too late.
************
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com


thelibertybeacon--2020-07-28--Great propaganda Tricks of Today: the “Anti-Vaxxer” ridicule ploy

The British Prime Minister recently reduced the vaccine safety debate to the utterly puerile and managed to dis-respect millions of British citizens into the bargain .
You can see him make a prat of himself here , but his words quoted from the video are as follows : “ Cause there ’ re all these anti-vaxxers now isn ’ t it ?
They are nuts .
They are nuts ” Well , thank you Prime Minister for your cogent and well-reasoned response to the concerns of your citizens over the safety of vaccines .
I suggest that if you are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being nuts , it is best to not act like a demented Muppet yourself .
Accusing someone with ideas they find difficult to counter of being mad is the last resort of those who are right out of sensible ideas .
The “ ah , you ’ re nuts !
” response is what we expect of a schoolboy not a ruddy Prime Minister and I am beginning to wonder if we would not have been better off to elect an adult to the highest office in the land .
The PM ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us all a favour as it neatly illustrates a propaganda ploy oft-used by pharmaceutical vested interests .
It goes like this : • Lump millions of concerned citizens together under a single generalised and largely inapplicable label .
In this case , “ anti-vaxxer ” .
• Then accuse everybody who comes under this label of being “ nuts ” or “ anti-science ” or some other such meaningless drivel .
• Keep repeating it in the hope that it will shut up anyone who has reservations about vaccines for fear of being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sort of hippy or some such thing .
The fact that this ploy is being used in order to ridicule anyone who dares voice doubts or concerns about vaccines tells you right there that the proponents of vaccines are hiding something , so instead of addressing the questions they simply discourage people from asking them .
“ Anti-vax ” implies “ against vaccination ” .
The label suggests that anyone thus labelled is rabidly opposed to vaccination , period – and with no other motivation than sheer bloody mindedness or a desire to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ horrible diseases .
This is simply not true .
Even the makers of the famous “ Vaxxed ” video the vaccine industry tries so hard to discredit are not actually anti-vaccine .
Imagine the town ’ s drinking water supply comes from a well on a local farm .
The farmer supplies the town with water from his well at a reasonable price , there is nothing wrong with the water and nobody goes thirsty .
One day , for one reason or another , the well becomes slightly contaminated and people start @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and says , “ We need to check the water !
It is contaminated and not safe to drink !
” This gets around and soon a number of people are unwilling to buy the farmer ’ s water and want it checked for contaminants before they will drink it .
The farmer who owns the well and makes a profit from supplying the town with water does not want his well examined so accuses his accusers of being “ anti water ” .
So every time someone tries to raise the question @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , pressuring for safety checks and so forth , the charge of being “ anti water ” is leveled at them .
By now the farmer has mobilised his mates on the local council to really hammer the anti water thing home and has even hired a PR firm , or had a word with the editor of the local newspaper .
.
.
“ Now there ’ s all these anti water agitators … ” says the farmer ’ s pal who happens to be the mayor .
“ They just want @ @ @ @ @ @ @ think water is evil .
Don ’ t listed to them !
Keep drinking the water and keep the threat of thirst at bay !
” “ But why would anyone campaign against water ?
” asks the citizenry , “ Maybe we should find out what they are worried about.
” “ Oh no , don ’ t communicate with those guys because they are anti water nut jobs .
That ’ s all it is , they ’ re nuts !
And don ’ t get too close to them in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nuts too .
.
.
But they are not anti water .
They think water is just fine , provided it is not contaminated with toxins that make people sick .
They think the well should be checked and if found to be contaminated , cleaned up until it isn ’ t .
And then nobody will have to get sick trying not to be thirsty .
They contend that if the local authorities were more diligent in ensuring the safety of the water supply , the owner of the well would raise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ensure the well remains clean .
So let ’ s do a quick in-a-nutshell breakdown of the valid concerns disingenuously included under this specious anti-vax label .
Concern 1 : is vaccine technology scientifically sound ?
Are there any risks inherent in it ?
Any drawbacks ?
And if there are , are they outweighed by the benefits ?
For the sake of argument I am going to assume that the technology is sound in principle and the benefits in principle outweigh the risks .
Concern 2 : although the technology itself is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its own right ?
Each vaccine must be studied and thoroughly tested for safety and to discover whether it actually does the job its manufacturers say it does .
By way of an analogy , we can all agree that air travel is a great idea and generally safe but that does not obviate the need to ensure that each aircraft passes rigorous safety checks and that each new design is thoroughly airworthy .
The concern of many who are mislabeled anti-vax is simply that each vaccine that comes onto the market is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and safety as thoroughly verified as it should be .
Which brings us to concern 3 .
Concern 3 : The overall SAFETY of vaccines has never been properly examined , tested and verified under full scientific rigor by scientists without ties or obligations to the industry that profits from the sale of vaccines .
A case in point is this article , which details the trickery that is used to “ prove ” vaccines are safe Concern 4 : The industry is notorious for its history of deceit , false claims and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trusted .
Concern 5 : There are those who are concerned that NO STUDY HAS EVER BEEN DONE to compare the overall health and longevity of vaccinated people with un-vaccinated people .
Concern 6. we do not know because it has never been scientifically studied , tested and verified , whether there is any liability to the NUMBER of vaccines given to a person , especially a child .
How many vaccines are safe to inject into a human being ?
One ?
two ?
Five ?
Twenty ?
An unlimited number ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
We simply do not know and we NEED to know because the vaccine industry is pressuring to inject us with more and more and more vaccines .
Concern 7 : nowadays toxins such as mercury , aluminium , formaldehyde and so forth are added to vaccines .
Do they cause short- or long-term damage ?
What are safe amounts ( if any ) ?
Are the harmful effects compounded as we inject a person with more and more vaccines containing these toxins ?
Concern 8 : if one is going to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be able to evaluate the benefits thereof against any risks .
This would depend upon the seriousness of the disease the vaccine is supposed to protect one from , how thoroughly it protects one and what are the chances of serious side effects .
This becomes even more important when it is a matter of injecting one ’ s children with an entire battery of vaccines .
The concern of those who are reluctant to go the vaccine route is that in the effort to market and sell vaccines , the manufacturers are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the government does not do enough to MAKE them more honest .
There are those who consider more pressure must be put on the industry to guarantee health and safety .
That pressure will then force the industry to raise its game in terms of producing proven safe vaccines and enable us to make use of its vaccines in greater confidence that they are as safe as the manufacturers say they are .
These are genuine concerns and valid questions .
We actually need to have them answered thoroughly and beyond reasonable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this wrong could be catastrophic .
The reluctance of vaccine proponents ( mainly the vaccine manufacturers and their proxies ) to support a full , IMPARTIAL , SCIENTIFICALLY RIGOROUS investigation to answer them once and for all is another serious concern .
If vaccines are innocent , why the reluctance ?
Why the resort to disingenuous generalisations and puerile ridicule ?
Millions of people , apparently as many as half the ruddy population in some countries , are skeptical about the safety of vaccines or of possible harm weighed against possible benefits .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the very good reason that their concerns have not been addressed and their questions not fully answered .
It is not “ all these anti-xaxxers ” who are responsible for an erosion in confidence in vaccines , but the industry itself on account of its past record and of its ongoing reluctance to address the legitimate concerns of consumers as it seeks to push more and more vaccines on them and their children .
Instead of trotting out a tame Prime Minister to ridicule those who are concerned , it would be best @ @ @ @ @ @ @ science .
The above was originally featured on UK Reloaded

by Jon Davy
London 27/7/20
The British Prime Minister recently reduced the vaccine safety debate to the utterly puerile and managed to dis-respect millions of British citizens into the bargain. You can see him make a prat of himself here, but his words quoted from the video are as follows:
“Cause there’re all these anti-vaxxers now isn’t it? They are nuts. They are nuts”
Well, thank you Prime Minister for your cogent and well-reasoned response to the concerns of your citizens over the safety of vaccines. I suggest that if you are going to accuse millions of people of being nuts, it is best to not act like a demented Muppet yourself.
Accusing someone with ideas they find difficult to counter of being mad is the last resort of those who are right out of sensible ideas. The “ah, you’re nuts!” response is what we expect of a schoolboy not a ruddy Prime Minister and I am beginning to wonder if we would not have been better off to elect an adult to the highest office in the land.
The PM’s disgraceful outburst, however, does us all a favour as it neatly illustrates a propaganda ploy oft-used by pharmaceutical vested interests. It goes like this:
Lump millions of concerned citizens together under a single generalised and largely inapplicable label. In this case, “anti-vaxxer”.
Then accuse everybody who comes under this label of being “nuts” or “anti-science” or some other such meaningless drivel.
Keep repeating it in the hope that it will shut up anyone who has reservations about vaccines for fear of being seen as “nuts” or some sort of hippy or some such thing.
The fact that this ploy is being used in order to ridicule anyone who dares voice doubts or concerns about vaccines tells you right there that the proponents of vaccines are hiding something, so instead of addressing the questions they simply discourage people from asking them.
“Anti-vax” implies “against vaccination”. The label suggests that anyone thus labelled is rabidly opposed to vaccination, period – and with no other motivation than sheer bloody mindedness or a desire to see the human race wiped out by horrible diseases.
This is simply not true. Even the makers of the famous “Vaxxed” video the vaccine industry tries so hard to discredit are not actually anti-vaccine.
Here’s a crude analogy:
Imagine the town’s drinking water supply comes from a well on a local farm.
The farmer supplies the town with water from his well at a reasonable price, there is nothing wrong with the water and nobody goes thirsty.
One day, for one reason or another, the well becomes slightly contaminated and people start getting sick.
Someone makes the connection and says, “We need to check the water! It is contaminated and not safe to drink!”
This gets around and soon a number of people are unwilling to buy the farmer’s water and want it checked for contaminants before they will drink it.
The farmer who owns the well and makes a profit from supplying the town with water does not want his well examined so accuses his accusers of being “anti water”.
So every time someone tries to raise the question of the condition of the water supply, pressuring for safety checks and so forth, the charge of being “anti water” is leveled at them.
By now the farmer has mobilised his mates on the local council to really hammer the anti water thing home and has even hired a PR firm, or had a word with the editor of the local newspaper . . .
“Now there’s all these anti water agitators … ” says the farmer’s pal who happens to be the mayor. “They just want you all to be thirsty because they think water is evil. Don’t listed to them! Keep drinking the water and keep the threat of thirst at bay!”
“But why would anyone campaign against water?” asks the citizenry, “Maybe we should find out what they are worried about.”
“Oh no, don’t communicate with those guys because they are anti water nut jobs. That’s all it is, they’re nuts! And don’t get too close to them in case people start thinking YOU’RE nuts too . . .
But they are not anti water. They think water is just fine, provided it is not contaminated with toxins that make people sick. They think the well should be checked and if found to be contaminated, cleaned up until it isn’t. And then nobody will have to get sick trying not to be thirsty.
They contend that if the local authorities were more diligent in ensuring the safety of the water supply, the owner of the well would raise his game and make more effort to ensure the well remains clean.
So let’s do a quick in-a-nutshell breakdown of the valid concerns disingenuously included under this specious anti-vax label.
Concern 1: is vaccine technology scientifically sound? Are there any risks inherent in it? Any drawbacks? And if there are, are they outweighed by the benefits? For the sake of argument I am going to assume that the technology is sound in principle and the benefits in principle outweigh the risks.
Concern 2: although the technology itself is workable, is EACH VACCINE safe in its own right? Each vaccine must be studied and thoroughly tested for safety and to discover whether it actually does the job its manufacturers say it does.
By way of an analogy, we can all agree that air travel is a great idea and generally safe but that does not obviate the need to ensure that each aircraft passes rigorous safety checks and that each new design is thoroughly airworthy. The concern of many who are mislabeled anti-vax is simply that each vaccine that comes onto the market is not as thoroughly tested and its health and safety as thoroughly verified as it should be. Which brings us to concern 3.
Concern 3: The overall SAFETY of vaccines has never been properly examined, tested and verified under full scientific rigor by scientists without ties or obligations to the industry that profits from the sale of vaccines. A case in point is this article, which details the trickery that is used to “prove” vaccines are safe
Concern 4: The industry is notorious for its history of deceit, false claims and dodgy science and simply cannot be trusted.
Concern 5: There are those who are concerned that NO STUDY HAS EVER BEEN DONE to compare the overall health and longevity of vaccinated people with un-vaccinated people.
Concern 6. we do not know because it has never been scientifically studied, tested and verified, whether there is any liability to the NUMBER of vaccines given to a person, especially a child. How many vaccines are safe to inject into a human being? One? two? Five? Twenty? An unlimited number? How many are safe for a child? We simply do not know and we NEED to know because the vaccine industry is pressuring to inject us with more and more and more vaccines.
Concern 7: nowadays toxins such as mercury, aluminium, formaldehyde and so forth are added to vaccines. Do they cause short- or long-term damage? What are safe amounts (if any)? Are the harmful effects compounded as we inject a person with more and more vaccines containing these toxins?
Concern 8: if one is going to be injected with a vaccine one needs to be able to evaluate the benefits thereof against any risks. This would depend upon the seriousness of the disease the vaccine is supposed to protect one from, how thoroughly it protects one and what are the chances of serious side effects. This becomes even more important when it is a matter of injecting one’s children with an entire battery of vaccines.
The concern of those who are reluctant to go the vaccine route is that in the effort to market and sell vaccines, the manufacturers are not always truthful on the benefits/risk issue and the government does not do enough to MAKE them more honest.
There are those who consider more pressure must be put on the industry to guarantee health and safety. That pressure will then force the industry to raise its game in terms of producing proven safe vaccines and enable us to make use of its vaccines in greater confidence that they are as safe as the manufacturers say they are.
These are genuine concerns and valid questions. We actually need to have them answered thoroughly and beyond reasonable doubt because the possible consequences of getting this wrong could be catastrophic.
The reluctance of vaccine proponents (mainly the vaccine manufacturers and their proxies) to support a full, IMPARTIAL, SCIENTIFICALLY RIGOROUS investigation to answer them once and for all is another serious concern. If vaccines are innocent, why the reluctance? Why the resort to disingenuous generalisations and puerile ridicule?
Millions of people, apparently as many as half the ruddy population in some countries, are skeptical about the safety of vaccines or of possible harm weighed against possible benefits. Not AGAINST vaccines, but SKEPTICAL for the very good reason that their concerns have not been addressed and their questions not fully answered.
It is not “all these anti-xaxxers ” who are responsible for an erosion in confidence in vaccines, but the industry itself on account of its past record and of its ongoing reluctance to address the legitimate concerns of consumers as it seeks to push more and more vaccines on them and their children.
Instead of trotting out a tame Prime Minister to ridicule those who are concerned, it would be best to directly address those concerns with honest science.
The above was originally featured on UK Reloaded
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-07-28--Trump Jr. locked out of Twitter account for sharing video defending HCQ as Covid-19 cure [Video]

Trump Jr. locked out of Twitter account for sharing controversial video defending HCQ as Covid-19 cure Donald Trump Jr has been given a “ temporary lockout ” from his Twitter account after violating the social media company ’ s “ misinformation policy ” by sharing a video defending hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) as a Covid-19 “ cure.
” “ This is a must watch !
!
So different from the narrative everyone is running with !
” Trump Jr. , the president ’ s eldest son , originally wrote when sharing the video .
The clip has been removed repeatedly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to see uncensored Video President Donald Trump tweeted the very same video – he has spoken of the antimalarial ’ s benefits in the past , though studies have shown varying results – and the tweet was removed , but he appears to have not been suspended like his son was , as he has tweeted since then .
Trump Jr ’ s tweet has been removed from his page as well , and he will not be able to use his account in full for the next 12 hours .
He can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but can not retweet , like , or post his own new tweets .
Twitter said through a spokesperson that this is not a “ suspension , ” but instead a “ temporary lockout.
” To end the “ lockout , ” Trump Jr. must willingly delete the tweet himself .
It has been replaced on his page with a message that simply reads : “ this tweet is no longer available.
” The same message can be found on the president ’ s Twitter page in place of his own tweet that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was originally streamed by conservative news outlet Breitbart and featured doctors , proclaiming themselves to be ‘ America ’ s Frontline Doctors , ’ talking about the benefits of HCQ and claiming masks are not needed to stop the spread of coronavirus .
The credentials of some in the video have since come into question , and the video has been actively purged from social media pages for spreading “ misinformation ” about the current pandemic .
Trump Jr ’ s Twitter lockout has only added fuel to the fire for people already @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conservatives .
“ If you don ’ t think this is about CONTROL , YOU AREN ’ T PAYING ATTENTION , ” Blaze TV host Sara Gonzalez tweeted in reaction .
Last month , US Attorney General William Barr announced a broad antitrust investigation into big tech companies , including an examination of their online practices , with potential actions likely dropping before the summer is up .
Twitter YANKS doctor ’ s fierce defense of HCQ as Covid-19 ‘ cure ’ after Trump ’ s retweet , as skeptics question her credentials @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Republican tells DOJ ahead of major hearing on Big Tech Is Pharma Censoring Science at a Major University by Choking the Money Channel ?
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional mischief @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Trump Jr. locked out of Twitter account for sharing controversial video defending HCQ as Covid-19 cure
RT-USA News
Donald Trump Jr has been given a “temporary lockout” from his Twitter account after violating the social media company’s “misinformation policy” by sharing a video defending hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as a Covid-19 “cure.”
Donald Trump Jr. speaks at a press conference in Des Moines, Iowa © REUTERS/Carlo Allegri
“This is a must watch!! So different from the narrative everyone is running with!” Trump Jr., the president’s eldest son, originally wrote when sharing the video. The clip has been removed repeatedly from social media sites.
President Donald Trump tweeted the very same video – he has spoken of the antimalarial’s benefits in the past, though studies have shown varying results – and the tweet was removed, but he appears to have not been suspended like his son was, as he has tweeted since then.
BREAKING: @Twitter & @jack have suspended @DonaldJTrumpJr for posting a viral video of medical doctors talking about Hydroxychloroquine. Big Tech is the biggest threat to free expression in America today & they’re continuing to engage in open election interference – full stop. pic.twitter.com/7dJbauq43O — Andrew Surabian (@Surabees) July 28, 2020
Trump Jr’s tweet has been removed from his page as well, and he will not be able to use his account in full for the next 12 hours. He can still send direct messages to followers, but cannot retweet, like, or post his own new tweets.
Twitter said through a spokesperson that this is not a “suspension,” but instead a “temporary lockout.” To end the “lockout,” Trump Jr. must willingly delete the tweet himself. It has been replaced on his page with a message that simply reads: “this tweet is no longer available.” The same message can be found on the president’s Twitter page in place of his own tweet that shared the video.
The video itself was originally streamed by conservative news outlet Breitbart and featured doctors, proclaiming themselves to be ‘America’s Frontline Doctors,’ talking about the benefits of HCQ and claiming masks are not needed to stop the spread of coronavirus. The credentials of some in the video have since come into question, and the video has been actively purged from social media pages for spreading “misinformation” about the current pandemic.
Trump Jr’s Twitter lockout has only added fuel to the fire for people already accusing social media companies of bias against conservatives.
“If you don’t think this is about CONTROL, YOU AREN’T PAYING ATTENTION,” Blaze TV host Sara Gonzalez tweeted in reaction.
“Despicable,”wrote political pundit and strategist Bryan Dean Wright.
Andrew Surabian @Surabees
BREAKING: @Twitter @jack have suspended @DonaldJTrumpJr for posting a viral video of medical doctors talking about Hydroxychloroquine. Big Tech is the biggest threat to free expression in America today & they’re continuing to engage in open election interference – full stop.
Ben Shapiro @benshapiro The evidence on hydroxychloroquine obviously contradicts the statements in the video. Also, this policy is insanely overbroad. It could have barred pro-masking content in early March, when the medically accepted information was that masks were just for medical professionals.
.
Last month, US Attorney General William Barr announced a broad antitrust investigation into big tech companies, including an examination of their online practices, with potential actions likely dropping before the summer is up.
_________
More from RT
*********
(TLB) published this article from RT-USA News
Related from The Liberty Beacon:
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.