thelibertybeacon--2020-05-09--The Social Re-Engineering of America  Part III of III

The Social Re-Engineering of America ( Part III of III ) Although Marx advocated the use of any means , especially including violent revolution , to bring about socialist dictatorship , he suggested ten political goals for developed countries such as the United States .
How far has the United States — traditionally the bastion of freedom , free markets , and private property — gone down the Marxist road to fulfill these socialist aims ?
You be the judge .
The following are Marx ’ s ten planks from his Communist Manifesto .
1 .
Abolition of private property @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of land to public purpose .
3 .
Abolition of all rights of inheritance .
4 .
Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels .
5 .
Centralization of credit in the hands of the state , by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly .
6 .
Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the state .
7 .
Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state ; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accordance with a common plan .
8 .
Equal obligation of all to work .
Establishment of Industrial armies , especially for agriculture .
9 .
Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries ; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country .
10 .
Free education for all children in government schools .
Abolition of children ’ s factory labor in its present form .
Combination of education with industrial production , etc .
etc .
“ So , is the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
Hardly !
Not compared to what it once was .
Yet , very few Americans today challenge these Marxist institutions , and there are virtually no politicians calling for their repeal or even gradual phase-out .
While the United States of America may still have more freedoms than most other countries , we have nonetheless lost many crucial liberties and have accepted the major socialist attacks on freedom and private property as normal parts of our way of life .
The nation , whose founders included such individualists as Thomas Jefferson , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Adams and Patrick Henry , has gradually turned away from the principles of individual rights , limited constitutional government , private property , and free markets and instead we increasingly have embraced the failed ideas and nostrums of socialism and fascism .
We should hang our heads in shame for having allowed this to happen.
” The Ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto Social engineering is an insidious and incremental process .
You take a once vibrant people with vigor , values , defiance in their Hearts , a love of Freedom , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those traits and produce a lazy , arrogant , fat , drugged up and “ government loving ” society .
That is how to socially re-engineer a society .
You give them “ circus and bread ” , like the Roman Empire did to its citizen/slaves .
That is how the love of Freedom is killed off , gently and softly .
Historically , all great empires have destroyed themselves from within .
Ironically , in America , we do not take in information thru facts anymore , as we take in information @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have to be spun by someone .
In ancient times there were traveling bards who told stories based on real events , but were enhanced to be better , funnier , more courageous , for instance , the Adventures of Don Quixote by Cervantes .
Our modern “ bards ” no longer travel along dusty country roads , but rather sit in ivory towers and spin their tales , like fauci and bill gaytes .
Modern main stream media is the greatest modern bard of all .
Advertising agencies are modern spinners .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , break industries as well as make industries , elevate world leaders and topple them as well .
However , are these modern bards simply enhancing tales or is there a more sinister agenda behind everything they do ?
Is there any Truth left in America ?
Reminds me of when I was in college .
I took one year of statistics , and what I figured out was that we could set up an experiment to prove virtually anything we wanted .
A set of statistics can be filtered again and again @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ There are lies , damned lies and statistics.
” My eternal question , Cui bono ?
Who benefits ?
“ Meanwhile , Schwartz and Woloshin estimate that in 1997 , pharmaceutical companies spent $ 1.3 billion on drug ads that targeted consumers .
By 2016 , that figure was roughly $ 6 billion .
The majority of these ads were television commercials and magazine ads .
In 1997 , drug companies spent roughly $ 17.1 billion on marketing for prescription drugs and any health conditions that may be associated with them .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ 26.9 billion .
Simultaneously , total US spending on prescription drugs skyrocketed from $ 116.4 billion to $ 329 billion.
” That seems like an incredible rate of return .
What is the fable being spun by Pig Pharma for the American consumer ?
A little white pill for every ill .
Welcome to the Pig Pharma Big Tent .
“ Come one , come all , our “ vaccinations ” will cure all your ills.
” These TV ads are so blatantly simple and appealing to the lowest common denominator , that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as described by the pharmaceutical ads .
“ Do you breath when you go to sleep at night ?
” “ Have you ever gotten up to urinate at night ?
” “ Do you sometimes feel like someone is watching you ?
” Well , our Billy and Hillary Clitory Snake Oil Elixir is guaranteed to sooth your ailments .
Two bottles of my special brandy elixir and you will be humping your wife like a rabbit .
“ Previous studies have found that drug sales may —particularly when that marketing targets @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been that Americans are getting better medical treatment as a result of targeted drug advertisements.
” That story is called “ cognitive dissonance.
” Big Pharma also spins stories for their best clients , doctors .
“ In 1997 , the total spending on marketing to physicians was $ 15.6 billion .
By 2016 , it was $ 20.3 billon .
Marketing to physicians includes sending paid representatives to doctors ’ offices to talk about a drug , free samples of it , or compensating physicians for speaking engagements about the drug.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ schemes that compensate doctors for prescribing drugs .
“ Illegal pharmaceutical kickbacks are designed to influence doctors ’ behavior ( and , as a result , boost sales ) by offering something of value in return .
Essentially , pharmaceutical companies bribe doctors to prescribe their products to more patients , sometimes for longer periods of time or in higher dosages .
” And guess who is the biggest beneficiary of the Pig Pharma spending ?
Main stream Media .
I would say that is a tad hypocritical on the part of these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ finding a doctor without deceit and ulterior motives , may be as difficult as finding a “ unicorn ” roaming the streets of New York City .
Follow me into the Rabbit hole for a little tour that will leave you speechless .
That ’ s the total revenue of the global pharmaceutical market .
To put that number in perspective , it ’ s roughly one-quarter of what the U.S. federal government will spend in 2016 .
Of the $ 1.05 trillion revenue for the global pharmaceutical market , nearly half of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comes from the U.S. and Canada .
However , the two countries make up only around 7 % of the total world population .
[ Which means that Canadians and Americans are the most drugged up and f @ # cked up societies in the world .
And we thought we were healthy .
Every single drug prescribed has more side effects than a dog has fleas . ]
This is the 2015 profit margin that Forbes estimated for the healthcare technology industry , making it by far the most profitable industry of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ companies leading the way .
The company really setting the pace is Gilead Sciences ( ) , which has a profit margin of nearly 53 % over the last 12 months .
The average stock return over the last 10 years for the 10 biggest pharmaceutical companies based on 2015 sales is 88 % .
However , this statistic is skewed by the huge returns of over 480 % during the period for Gilead .
Excluding the big biotech , stock returns for the other big 10 biopharmaceutical companies averaged 44 % — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the S & P 500 index .
Members of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America ( PhRMA ) invested a combined $ 58.8 billion in research and development during 2015 , up from $ 53.3 billion the previous year .
According to the National Science Foundation , the biopharmaceutical industry accounted for 21 % of all U.S. business research and development spending in 2011 .
The second-highest industry , software , accounted for 11 % of R & D spending .
Where does all that R & D spending go ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ around the world .
That number includes 1,813 cancer drugs and 1,329 neurological disorder drugs .
Around 70 % of the overall total of drugs in development are potential first-in-class medicines .
This number of drugs approved by the FDA last year might not seem like a big deal at first glance .
However , it ’ s the second-highest total in at least 35 years .
The only year where more drugs were approved by the FDA in recent history was 1996 , with 53 approvals .
Nearly half of the drugs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Developing a new drug costs pharmaceutical companies around $ 2.6 billion on average .
That figure includes the costs associated with drug failures .
By comparison , the average cost to develop a drug in the 1980s was around $ 413 million .
Less than 12 % of drugs that make it to clinical trials ultimately win regulatory approval .
For some indications , the odds are even lower .
Between 1998 and 2014 , pharmaceutical companies attempted to develop 123 Alzheimer ’ s disease drugs .
Only four won approval .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ spent on prescription drug advertising in 2015 .
The largest chunk of that amount was for television advertising .
Two drugs in particular were promoted on TV the most .
AbbVie ( ) spent $ 357 million last year in TV ads for Humira .
Pfizer ( ) wasn ’ t far behind , shelling out $ 328 million on commercials promoting Lyrica .
The biopharmaceutical industry directly employs 854,000 people in the U.S .
When you count indirect jobs for suppliers and vendors to the industry plus induced jobs from additional economic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 4.4 million jobs .
Talk about the patent cliff has subsided , but the reality is that Big Pharma still faces a patent cliff .
From 2016 through 2018 , drugs with pre-expiry value totaling a combined $ 64.2 billion will face generic competition .
Among them are top-selling drugs like and Pfizer ’ s Lyrica .
12 Big Pharma Stats That Will Blow You Away Every drug ad is a spin story geared to one thing , “ Ask you doctor about this new and improved drug.
” In fact , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spin story ” concocted by white , anglo-philes , racist , slave owners .
Ironically , no one seems to care about the human cost at the end of the line .
In the United States , it ’ s about the Money .
Steven Yates describes the six stages of Empire , “ According to Glubb , empires go through fairly specific ( often overlapping ) stages : Once any nation enters stage 6 , there is no turning back .
Such a nation or country will suffer the indignities of all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ re-balance , not matter what the human cost .
Mother Nature is indifferent to humans .
Mother Nature is neutral and seeks only balance .
America entered Stage 6 post WWII and has been on a downward path since then .
In between Stage 1 and Stage 6 , societies are socially re-engineered by the Ruling Cabals to benefit only themselves .
Eventually , even Slaves get to embrace , and actually , Love their own Slavery .
After awhile you could get used to anything .
“ So long as men worship @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Napoleons will duly arise and make them miserable.
” “ In lockdown countries , the bad blood between the public and government will not evaporate after the ‘ crisis ’ is over , which is a real problem which lockdown governments will continue facing in the future.
” Patrick Henningson , TLB In “ incarceration nation ” aka , United States , perhaps this is the very desired result .
The goal being to incarcerate more and more men and women for minor offenses against the state born out of sheer frustration .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to create a docile , sheeple population standing in bread lines miles long , with their hat in their hand , asking for some sort of handout to simply feed their families .
Sheeple in a bread line can not afford to be defiant , independent and belligerant , they will simply not get any benefits , other than the “ benefit ” of being tossed in jail for being impatient .
A nation of Commercial Refugees , please read my chapter titled , “ Commercial Refugees of the United States ” , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to control than a population , working , socially interacting , and earning a good living thru their own effort .
That is how to socially re-engineer a society .
Baaa !
Baaa !
!
!
My Voice is the Cry from the Wilderness , Travel Well my Brothers and Sisters .
Read Parts I & II by clicking on the images below :

The Social Re-Engineering of America (Part III of III)
(See link for Parts I & II below article)
By TLB Contributing Author: Rico S. Giron
Although Marx advocated the use of any means, especially including violent revolution, to bring about socialist dictatorship, he suggested ten political goals for developed countries such as the United States. How far has the United States — traditionally the bastion of freedom, free markets, and private property — gone down the Marxist road to fulfill these socialist aims? You be the judge. The following are Marx’s ten planks from his Communist Manifesto.
1. Abolition of private property in land and application of all rents of land to public purpose.
The courts have interpreted the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868) to give the government far more “eminent domain” power than was originally intended, Under the rubric of “eminent domain” and various zoning regulations, land use regulations by the Bureau of Land Management property taxes, and “environmental” excuses, private property rights have become very diluted and private property in landis, vehicles, and other forms are seized almost every day in this country under the “forfeiture” provisions of the RICO statutes and the so-called War on Drugs..
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
The 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913 (which some scholars maintain was never properly ratified), and various State income taxes, established this major Marxist coup in the United States many decades ago. These taxes continue to drain the lifeblood out of the American economy and greatly reduce the accumulation of desperately needed capital for future growth, business starts, job creation, and salary increases.
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
Another Marxian attack on private property rights is in the form of Federal & State estate taxes and other inheritance taxes, which have abolished or at least greatly diluted the right of private property owners to determine the disposition and distribution of their estates upon their death. Instead, government bureaucrats get their greedy hands involved . Otherwise known as “grave robbing.”
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
We call it private property rights “forfeiture” Public “law” 99-570 (1986); Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; the imprisonment of “terrorists” and those who speak out or write against the “government” (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill); or the IRS confiscation of property without due process. Oh shit, I’m in trouble.
5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.
The Federal Reserve System, created by the Federal Reserve Act of Congress in 1913, is indeed such a “national bank” and it politically manipulates interest rates and holds a monopoly on legal counterfeiting in the United States. This is exactly what Marx had in mind and completely fulfills this plank, another major socialist objective. Yet, most Americans naively believe the U.S. of A. is far from a Marxist or socialist nation.
6. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the state.
In the U.S., communication and transportation are controlled and regulated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) established by the Communications Act of 1934 and the Department of Transportation and the Interstate Commerce Commission (established by Congress in 1887), and the Federal Aviation Administration as well as Executive orders 11490, 10999 — not to mention various state bureaucracies and regulations. There is also the federal postal monopoly, AMTRAK and CONRAIL — outright socialist (government-owned) enterprises. Instead of free-market private enteprrise in these important industries, these fields in America are semi-cartelized through the government’s regulatory-industiral complex. In 2020, they are fully cartelized, like the Medellin Cartel from Columbia.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
While the U.S. does not have vast “collective farms” (which failed so miserably in the Soviet Union), we nevertheless do have a significant degree of government involvement in agriculture in the form of price support subsidies and acreage alotments and land-use controls. The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture. As well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Evironmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations.
8. Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of Industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
We call it the Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor. The National debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two “income” family. Woman in the workplace since the 1920’s, the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions, affirmative action, the Federal Public Works Program and of course Executive order 11000. And I almost forgot…The Equal Rights Amendment means that women should do all work that men do including the military and since passage it would make women subject to the draft.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.
We call it the Planning Reorganization Act of 1949 , zoning (Title 17 1910-1990) and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public “law” 89-136.
10. Free education for all children in government schools. Abolition of children’s factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc. etc.
People are being taxed to support what we call ‘public’ schools, which train the young to work for the communal debt system. We also call it the Department of Education, the NEA and Outcome Based “Education” . [I simply call it, “indoctrination”, why lie?]
“So, is the U.S. a “free country” today? Hardly! Not compared to what it once was. Yet, very few Americans today challenge these Marxist institutions, and there are virtually no politicians calling for their repeal or even gradual phase-out. While the United States of America may still have more freedoms than most other countries, we have nonetheless lost many crucial liberties and have accepted the major socialist attacks on freedom and private property as normal parts of our way of life. The nation, whose founders included such individualists as Thomas Jefferson, George Mason, James Madison, John Adams and Patrick Henry, has gradually turned away from the principles of individual rights, limited constitutional government, private property, and free markets and instead we increasingly have embraced the failed ideas and nostrums of socialism and fascism. We should hang our heads in shame for having allowed this to happen.” The Ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto
Social engineering is an insidious and incremental process. You take a once vibrant people with vigor, values, defiance in their Hearts, a love of Freedom, and slowly, imperceptibly erode all of those traits and produce a lazy, arrogant, fat, drugged up and “government loving” society. That is how to socially re-engineer a society. You give them “circus and bread”, like the Roman Empire did to its citizen/slaves. That is how the love of Freedom is killed off, gently and softly. Historically, all great empires have destroyed themselves from within.
Ironically, in America, we do not take in information thru facts anymore, as we take in information thru stories and government narratives. Stories have to be spun by someone. In ancient times there were traveling bards who told stories based on real events, but were enhanced to be better, funnier, more courageous, for instance, the Adventures of Don Quixote by Cervantes. Our modern “bards” no longer travel along dusty country roads, but rather sit in ivory towers and spin their tales, like fauci and bill gaytes. Modern main stream media is the greatest modern bard of all. Advertising agencies are modern spinners. They can swing markets, initiate trends, break industries as well as make industries, elevate world leaders and topple them as well. However, are these modern bards simply enhancing tales or is there a more sinister agenda behind everything they do? Is there any Truth left in America? Reminds me of when I was in college. I took one year of statistics, and what I figured out was that we could set up an experiment to prove virtually anything we wanted. A set of statistics can be filtered again and again to get the desired end result. “There are lies, damned lies and statistics.” My eternal question, Cui bono? Who benefits? “Meanwhile, Schwartz and Woloshin estimate that in 1997, pharmaceutical companies spent $1.3 billion on drug ads that targeted consumers. By 2016, that figure was roughly $6 billion. The majority of these ads were television commercials and magazine ads. In 1997, drug companies spent roughly $17.1 billion on marketing for prescription drugs and any health conditions that may be associated with them. By 2016, that figure was $26.9 billion. Simultaneously, total US spending on prescription drugs skyrocketed from $116.4 billion to $329 billion.” That seems like an incredible rate of return. What is the fable being spun by Pig Pharma for the American consumer? A little white pill for every ill. Welcome to the Pig Pharma Big Tent. “Come one, come all, our “vaccinations” will cure all your ills.”
These TV ads are so blatantly simple and appealing to the lowest common denominator, that virtually everyone has one or more symptoms as described by the pharmaceutical ads. “Do you breath when you go to sleep at night?” “Have you ever gotten up to urinate at night?” “Do you sometimes feel like someone is watching you?” Well, our Billy and Hillary Clitory Snake Oil Elixir is guaranteed to sooth your ailments. Two bottles of my special brandy elixir and you will be humping your wife like a rabbit. “Previous studies have found that drug sales may increase as a result of advertising —particularly when that marketing targets a lay audience. But there has been no evidence that Americans are getting better medical treatment as a result of targeted drug advertisements.” That story is called “cognitive dissonance.” Big Pharma also spins stories for their best clients, doctors. “In 1997, the total spending on marketing to physicians was $15.6 billion. By 2016, it was $20.3 billon. Marketing to physicians includes sending paid representatives to doctors’ offices to talk about a drug, free samples of it, or compensating physicians for speaking engagements about the drug.” Not to mention the massive kick back schemes that compensate doctors for prescribing drugs. “Illegal pharmaceutical kickbacks are designed to influence doctors’ behavior (and, as a result, boost sales) by offering something of value in return. Essentially, pharmaceutical companies bribe doctors to prescribe their products to more patients, sometimes for longer periods of time or in higher dosages .”
Pharmaceutical Fraud: What are Kickback Schemes?
And guess who is the biggest beneficiary of the Pig Pharma spending? Main stream Media. I would say that is a tad hypocritical on the part of these so-called, “doctors.” Indeed, finding a doctor without deceit and ulterior motives, may be as difficult as finding a “unicorn” roaming the streets of New York City.
Follow me into the Rabbit hole for a little tour that will leave you speechless.
1. $1.05 trillion
That’s the total revenue of the global pharmaceutical market. To put that number in perspective, it’s roughly one-quarter of what the U.S. federal government will spend in 2016.
2. $515 billion
Of the $1.05 trillion revenue for the global pharmaceutical market, nearly half of it — roughly $515 billion — comes from the U.S. and Canada. However, the two countries make up only around 7% of the total world population. [Which means that Canadians and Americans are the most drugged up and f@#cked up societies in the world. And we thought we were healthy. Every single drug prescribed has more side effects than a dog has fleas.]
3. 21%
This is the 2015 profit margin that Forbes estimated for the healthcare technology industry, making it by far the most profitable industry of all, with major and generic pharmaceutical companies leading the way. The company really setting the pace is Gilead Sciences ( NASDAQ:GILD ), which has a profit margin of nearly 53% over the last 12 months.
4. 88%
The average stock return over the last 10 years for the 10 biggest pharmaceutical companies based on 2015 sales is 88%. However, this statistic is skewed by the huge returns of over 480% during the period for Gilead. Excluding the big biotech, stock returns for the other big 10 biopharmaceutical companies averaged 44% — well below the 73% returns achieved by the S&P 500 index.
5. $58.8 billion
Members of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) invested a combined $58.8 billion in research and development during 2015, up from $53.3 billion the previous year. According to the National Science Foundation, the biopharmaceutical industry accounted for 21% of all U.S. business research and development spending in 2011. The second-highest industry, software, accounted for 11% of R&D spending.
6. 7,000+
Where does all that R&D spending go? Over 7,000 drugs are currently in development around the world. That number includes 1,813 cancer drugs and 1,329 neurological disorder drugs. Around 70% of the overall total of drugs in development are potential first-in-class medicines.
7. 45
This number of drugs approved by the FDA last year might not seem like a big deal at first glance. However, it’s the second-highest total in at least 35 years. The only year where more drugs were approved by the FDA in recent history was 1996, with 53 approvals. Nearly half of the drugs approved in 2015 were for rare diseases.
8. $2.6 billion
Developing a new drug costs pharmaceutical companies around $2.6 billion on average. That figure includes the costs associated with drug failures. By comparison, the average cost to develop a drug in the 1980s was around $413 million.
9. 12%
Less than 12% of drugs that make it to clinical trials ultimately win regulatory approval. For some indications, the odds are even lower. Between 1998 and 2014, pharmaceutical companies attempted to develop 123 Alzheimer’s disease drugs. Only four won approval.
10. $5.2 billion
Nielson estimated that $5.2 billion was spent on prescription drug advertising in 2015. The largest chunk of that amount was for television advertising. Two drugs in particular were promoted on TV the most. AbbVie ( NYSE:ABBV ) spent $357 million last year in TV ads for Humira. Pfizer ( NYSE:PFE ) wasn’t far behind, shelling out $328 million on commercials promoting Lyrica.
11. 854,000
The biopharmaceutical industry directly employs 854,000 people in the U.S. When you count indirect jobs for suppliers and vendors to the industry plus induced jobs from additional economic activity, the industry supports an estimated 4.4 million jobs.
12. 64.2 billion
Talk about the patent cliff has subsided, but the reality is that Big Pharma still faces a patent cliff. From 2016 through 2018, drugs with pre-expiry value totaling a combined $64.2 billion will face generic competition. Among them are top-selling drugs like AbbVie’s Humira and Pfizer’s Lyrica.
12 Big Pharma Stats That Will Blow You Away
Every drug ad is a spin story geared to one thing, “Ask you doctor about this new and improved drug.” In fact, the founding of this country was a “spin story” concocted by white, anglo-philes, racist, slave owners. Ironically, no one seems to care about the human cost at the end of the line. In the United States, it’s about the Money.
Steven Yates describes the six stages of Empire, “According to Glubb, empires go through fairly specific (often overlapping) stages:
(1) An Age of Pioneers.
(2) An Age of Conquest.
(3) An Age of Commerce.
(4) An Age of Affluence
(5) An Age of Intellect.
(6) An Age of Decadence.
Once any nation enters stage 6, there is no turning back. Such a nation or country will suffer the indignities of all its past sins and Mother Nature will re-balance, not matter what the human cost. Mother Nature is indifferent to humans. Mother Nature is neutral and seeks only balance. America entered Stage 6 post WWII and has been on a downward path since then. In between Stage 1 and Stage 6, societies are socially re-engineered by the Ruling Cabals to benefit only themselves. Eventually, even Slaves get to embrace, and actually, Love their own Slavery. After awhile you could get used to anything. “So long as men worship the Caesars and Napoleons, Caesars and Napoleons will duly arise and make them miserable.” Aldous Huxley
“In lockdown countries, the bad blood between the public and government will not evaporate after the ‘crisis’ is over, which is a real problem which lockdown governments will continue facing in the future.” Patrick Henningson, TLB In “incarceration nation” aka, United States, perhaps this is the very desired result. The goal being to incarcerate more and more men and women for minor offenses against the state born out of sheer frustration. More than anything the United States wants to create a docile, sheeple population standing in bread lines miles long, with their hat in their hand, asking for some sort of handout to simply feed their families. Sheeple in a bread line cannot afford to be defiant, independent and belligerant, they will simply not get any benefits, other than the “benefit” of being tossed in jail for being impatient. A nation of Commercial Refugees, please read my chapter titled, “Commercial Refugees of the United States”, broken in spirit, are much easier to control than a population, working, socially interacting, and earning a good living thru their own effort. That is how to socially re-engineer a society. Baaa! Baaa!!!
So throw away your baggage and go forward.
There are quicksands all about you, sucking at your feet,
trying to suck you down into fear and self-pity and despair.
That’s why you must walk so lightly.
Lightly my darling,
on tiptoes and no luggage,
not even a sponge bag,
completely unencumbered.”
― Aldous Huxley , Island
My Voice is the Cry from the Wilderness,
Travel Well my Brothers and Sisters.
••••
Read Parts I & II by clicking on the images below:
••••
••••
Notice from the Author Any and all copyright restrictions are hereby lifted by the original author. This article (all 3 parts) may be copied, cited, and reproduced in part or in whole with no restrictions on copyright. Rico S. Giron
••••
About the Author, Rico S. Giron: I have been writing and journaling non-professionally for 43 years. My adventures into personal literature began when I was 18 years old. My life has been an exploration and adventure in consciousness and philosophical meanderings … To find out more please visit: Journey Into Insanity: Adventures In Consciousness and Synchronicity Or Visit Rico on facebook •••• Read more great articles by Rico •••• •••• Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-09--COVID-19: Spearpoint for Rolling Out a “New Era” of High-Risk, Genetically Engineered Vaccines

Written & Contributed to TLB by : The Children ’ s Health Defense Team For weeks , talking heads have been promoting the liability-free vaccine ( s ) that will save the world—so Bill Gates and Tony Fauci proclaim—from what Gates has now dubbed “ Pandemic I.
” As Microsoft News peddles self-congratulatory stories about the Gates Foundation ’ s reorientation of its priorities to devote “ ‘ total attention ’ to the pandemic , ” Fauci—making the rounds of talk shows—pledges that a vaccine will make its debut in January 2021 .
Not to be outdone , the White @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Speed ” —a joint pharmaceutical-government-military effort aimed at “ substantially shrinking the development time for a vaccine ” —and President Trump promises one by the end of the year .
Planet-wide COVID-19 vaccination—the overt objective that has all of these players salivating in anticipation—ignores a number of irrefutable obstacles .
For one , the RNA virus being targeted , SARS-CoV-2 , already “ has mutated into at least 30 different genetic variants.
” The variants include 19 never seen before as well as “ rare changes that scientists had never imagined could happen.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ useful to clinicians wanting to better tailor their COVID-19 treatments , but the proliferation of mutations makes the chances of developing an effective vaccine immensely more uncertain .
Not to worry , say the entities funded by Gates ( and also the Pentagon ) .
Scientists working in the burgeoning field of synthetic biology are confident that they can “ outdo ” and outsmart nature using next-generation vaccine technologies such as gene transfer and self-assembling nanoparticles—along with invasive new vaccine delivery and record-keeping mechanisms such as smartphone-readable quantum dot tattoos .
Does it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ experimenting with these approaches have never been able to overcome “ nasty side effects ” ?
Apparently not .
Aided and abetted by the generous Gates and military funding , high-fanfare COVID-19 vaccine planning is proceeding apace .
From a manufacturing standpoint , vaccine makers—and particularly those making viral vaccines—have long chafed at the limitations of traditional vaccine technologies , which rely on processes that necessarily entail “ a considerable lag time between antigen production and vaccine delivery.
” Researchers reiterated this point again in 2018 , writing in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the main obstacle is not the effectiveness of conventional approaches but the need for more rapid development and large-scale deployment.
” In the 1980s , vaccine manufacturers were elated when scientists developed new genetic engineering techniques ( recombinant DNA technology ) that—through the use of “ expression systems ” ( bacteria , yeast , insect cells , mammalian cells or plants such as tobacco ) —made it possible to jumpstart vaccine production and produce so-called “ subunit vaccines.
” The hepatitis B vaccine was the first to employ this “ entirely new @ @ @ @ @ @ @ number of the COVID-19 vaccines currently in the works are deploying these techniques .
However , a complicating factor of subunit vaccines is that they must be bundled with “ immunopotentiating ” adjuvants that tend to trigger an imbalanced immune response .
Desirous of streamlining vaccine technology still further and enabling vaccine stockpiles in an even shorter time frame , researchers began tinkering in the mid-1990s with nucleic acid vaccines , which include DNA vaccines and messenger RNA ( mRNA ) vaccines .
As a form of gene therapy , both represent a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the latter introduce a vaccine antigen to produce an immune response , nucleic acid vaccines instead send the body instructions to produce the antigen itself .
As one researcher explains , the nucleic acids “ cause the cells to make pieces of the virus , ” with the goal being that the immune system then “ mounts a response to those pieces of the virus.
” Researchers quickly learned that both the DNA and mRNA vaccine options have serious downsides , and as a result , vaccines of this type have never been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 20/83 ) of the vaccines listed by the World Health Organization as COVID-19 “ candidate vaccines ” as of April 23—including two of the leading contenders—are DNA ( Inovio ) or mRNA ( Moderna ) vaccines ( see table ) .
DNA vaccines are intended to penetrate all the way into a cell ’ s nucleus .
According to one biotech scientist , “ This is an incredibly difficult task given that our nuclei have evolved to prevent any foreign DNA from entering ( Think viruses ! )
.
” Not surprisingly , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it into clinical trials in the late 2000s , they were plagued by “ suboptimal potency.
” Scientists then came up with the idea of solving this problem by augmenting vaccine delivery with “ electroporation ” —electric shocks applied to the vaccine site ( using a “ smart device ” ) to make cell membranes more permeable and force the DNA into the cells .
The improvements in vaccine efficacy were significant enough that electroporation remains a key design feature of some COVID-19 vaccine candidates today , including the Moderna vaccine that is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
A second aspect of DNA vaccines—their gene-altering properties—is even more troubling and remains unresolved .
DNA vaccines , by definition , come with the risk of “ integration of exogenous DNA into the host genome , which may cause severe mutagenesis and induced new diseases.
” Framed in more understandable terms , “ disruption from DNA is like inserting a foreign ingredient in an existing recipe , which can change the resulting dish.
” The permanent incorporation of synthetic genes into the recipient ’ s DNA essentially produces a genetically modified human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Speaking of DNA gene therapy , one researcher has stated , “ Genetic integrations using viral gene therapies .
.
.
can have a devastating effect if the integration was placed in the wrong spot in [ the ] genome.
” Discussing DNA vaccines specifically , the Harvard College Global Health Review elaborates : Because mRNA vaccines are “ particularly suited to speedy development , ” it is perhaps unsurprising that they are attracting attention as the “ coronavirus frontrunners.
” mRNA vaccines can reportedly generate savings of “ months or years to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mass production.
” Making lemonade out of lemons , insiders casually state that “ while no mRNA vaccine has ever been licensed , the threat of a pandemic is a great incentive to accelerate their progress.
” Companies are enamored of the mRNA approach despite observations that the large mRNA molecules are “ intrinsically unstable , ” “ prone to degradation ” and may overactivate the immune system .
On the plus side , from vaccine scientists ’ standpoint , mRNA vaccines need only reach the cell cytoplasm rather than the nucleus—an apparently @ @ @ @ @ @ @ approach still demands “ delivery technologies that can ensure stabilization of mRNA under physiological conditions.
” Formulations such as Moderna ’ s mRNA-1273 vaccine tackle these challenges by using “ chemical modifications to stabilize the mRNA ” and liquid nanoparticles to “ package it into an injectable form.
” mRNA approaches seem to attract researchers with a highly mechanistic view of human beings .
One such individual praises mRNA for its “ inherent ‘ programmability , ” stating “ Much like [ a ] computer [ operating system ] , mRNA therapy can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to produce its own therapies ” [ emphasis in original ] .
The CEO of Moderna describes mRNA approaches—which use “ custom-built ” strands of mRNA to “ turn the body ’ s cells into ad hoc drug factories ” —as being “ like software : You can just turn the crank and get a lot of products going into development.
” Likewise , the journal Nature ( commenting on mRNA technology from “ a biotech and industrial perspective ” ) enthuses that the approach “ allows rapid refinement with almost limitless combinations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ both DNA and mRNA vaccines like to play up mRNA vaccine safety , citing the fact that the vaccines do not have to penetrate the cell nucleus .
However , with years of mRNA vaccine experimentation behind them , none of these researchers has yet achieved licensure .
Why ?
One answer may be that in preclinical studies , mRNA vaccines have displayed an “ intrinsic ” inflammatory component that makes it difficult to establish an “ acceptable risk/benefit profile.
” mRNA enthusiasts admit that there is , as yet , an inadequate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that may result .
This raises many questions about what will happen if regulators grant the manufacturers of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines their wish for “ a fast-track process to get mRNA vaccines to people sooner.
” The hijacking of nearly all economic , social , artistic and religious activity by SARS-CoV-2 is disturbing on many levels , not least because of what it reveals about the public ’ s uncritical acceptance of official spin and its yearning for medical silver bullets .
As a vaccine researcher at Sweden ’ s Karolinska Institute has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 vaccines is also accelerating the conjoined-twins fusion of pharma and biotech .
The lucrative biopharma sector is now the fastest-growing segment of the global drug industry , currently representing 20 % of the worldwide market and displaying an annual growth rate that is more than double that of conventional pharma .
And COVID-19 vaccines are helping rescue some biopharma companies ’ shaky bottom lines .
In 2017 , for example , Moderna was struggling to “ keep afloat its brash promise to reinvent medicine ” after an experimental therapy that it was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in humans .
Fast forward to 2020 , when “ bad news about the coronavirus is good news for Moderna stock.
” Other biopharma companies formerly on the skids are likewise poised to make record profits from COVID-19 .
As biopharma pursues its unfettered , medical-ethics-be-damned race toward a COVID-19 pot of gold , the public needs to take a critical look at the industry ’ s disincentives for safety and also take a firm stand against the horrifying prospect of coronavirus vaccine mandates .
Otherwise , genetically engineered COVID-19 vaccines are likely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ autoimmunity and serving as the catalyst for other vaccine injuries or deaths , and—unhampered by any legal liability—none of the commercial or government actors responsible will likely care .

Written & Contributed to TLB by: The Children’s Health Defense Team
Note: This article represents Part I of a two-part series examining COVID-19 vaccine technologies and their implications.
For weeks, talking heads have been promoting the liability-free vaccine(s) that will save the world—so Bill Gates and Tony Fauci proclaim—from what Gates has now dubbed “Pandemic I.” As Microsoft News peddles self-congratulatory stories about the Gates Foundation’s reorientation of its priorities to devote “‘total attention’ to the pandemic,” Fauci—making the rounds of talk shows—pledges that a vaccine will make its debut in January 2021. Not to be outdone, the White House has now unveiled “Operation Warp Speed”—a joint pharmaceutical-government-military effort aimed at “substantially shrinking the development time for a vaccine”—and President Trump promises one by the end of the year.
Planet-wide COVID-19 vaccination—the overt objective that has all of these players salivating in anticipation—ignores a number of irrefutable obstacles. For one, the RNA virus being targeted, SARS-CoV-2, already “has mutated into at least 30 different genetic variants.” The variants include 19 never seen before as well as “rare changes that scientists had never imagined could happen.” Knowledge about these mutations may prove useful to clinicians wanting to better tailor their COVID-19 treatments, but the proliferation of mutations makes the chances of developing an effective vaccine immensely more uncertain.
Not to worry, say the entities funded by Gates (and also the Pentagon). Scientists working in the burgeoning field of synthetic biology are confident that they can “outdo” and outsmart nature using next-generation vaccine technologies such as gene transfer and self-assembling nanoparticles—along with invasive new vaccine delivery and record-keeping mechanisms such as smartphone-readable quantum dot tattoos. Does it matter that the researchers who have been experimenting with these approaches have never been able to overcome “nasty side effects”? Apparently not. Aided and abetted by the generous Gates and military funding, high-fanfare COVID-19 vaccine planning is proceeding apace.
Researchers reiterated this point … that for most emerging virus vaccines, the main obstacle is not the effectiveness of conventional approaches but the need for more rapid development and large-scale deployment. Researchers reiterated this point … that for most emerging virus vaccines, the main obstacle is not the effectiveness of conventional approaches but the need for more rapid development and large-scale deployment.
Speed, not safety
From a manufacturing standpoint, vaccine makers—and particularly those making viral vaccines—have long chafed at the limitations of traditional vaccine technologies, which rely on processes that necessarily entail “a considerable lag time between antigen production and vaccine delivery.” Researchers reiterated this point again in 2018, writing in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery that “for most emerging virus vaccines, the main obstacle is not the effectiveness of conventional approaches but the need for more rapid development and large-scale deployment.”
In the 1980s, vaccine manufacturers were elated when scientists developed new genetic engineering techniques (recombinant DNA technology) that—through the use of “expression systems” (bacteria, yeast, insect cells, mammalian cells or plants such as tobacco)—made it possible to jumpstart vaccine production and produce so-called “subunit vaccines.” The hepatitis B vaccine was the first to employ this “entirely new” vaccine production approach, and a number of the COVID-19 vaccines currently in the works are deploying these techniques. However, a complicating factor of subunit vaccines is that they must be bundled with “immunopotentiating” adjuvants that tend to trigger an imbalanced immune response.
Desirous of streamlining vaccine technology still further and enabling vaccine stockpiles in an even shorter time frame, researchers began tinkering in the mid-1990s with nucleic acid vaccines, which include DNA vaccines and messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines. As a form of gene therapy, both represent a significant departure from classical vaccines. Whereas the latter introduce a vaccine antigen to produce an immune response, nucleic acid vaccines instead send the body instructions to produce the antigen itself. As one researcher explains, the nucleic acids “cause the cells to make pieces of the virus,” with the goal being that the immune system then “mounts a response to those pieces of the virus.”
Researchers quickly learned that both the DNA and mRNA vaccine options have serious downsides, and as a result, vaccines of this type have never been licensed. Nonetheless, almost one-fourth (20/83) of the vaccines listed by the World Health Organization as COVID-19 “candidate vaccines” as of April 23—including two of the leading contenders—are DNA (Inovio) or mRNA (Moderna) vaccines (see table).
DNA vaccines, by definition, come with the risk of integration of exogenous DNA into the host genome, which may cause severe mutagenesis and induced new diseases. DNA vaccines, by definition, come with the risk of integration of exogenous DNA into the host genome, which may cause severe mutagenesis and induced new diseases.
DNA vaccines
DNA vaccines are intended to penetrate all the way into a cell’s nucleus. According to one biotech scientist, “This is an incredibly difficult task given that our nuclei have evolved to prevent any foreign DNA from entering (Think viruses!).” Not surprisingly, then, when some DNA vaccines made it into clinical trials in the late 2000s, they were plagued by “suboptimal potency.” Scientists then came up with the idea of solving this problem by augmenting vaccine delivery with “electroporation”—electric shocks applied to the vaccine site (using a “smart device”) to make cell membranes more permeable and force the DNA into the cells. The improvements in vaccine efficacy were significant enough that electroporation remains a key design feature of some COVID-19 vaccine candidates today, including the Moderna vaccine that is now speeding toward Phase 2 clinical trials.
A second aspect of DNA vaccines—their gene-altering properties—is even more troubling and remains unresolved. DNA vaccines, by definition, come with the risk of “integration of exogenous DNA into the host genome, which may cause severe mutagenesis and induced new diseases.” Framed in more understandable terms, “disruption from DNA is like inserting a foreign ingredient in an existing recipe, which can change the resulting dish.” The permanent incorporation of synthetic genes into the recipient’s DNA essentially produces a genetically modified human being, with unknown long-term effects. Speaking of DNA gene therapy, one researcher has stated, “Genetic integrations using viral gene therapies . . . can have a devastating effect if the integration was placed in the wrong spot in [the] genome.” Discussing DNA vaccines specifically, the Harvard College Global Health Review elaborates:
Potential side effects could include chronic inflammation, because the vaccine continuously stimulates the immune system to produce antibodies. Other concerns include the possible integration of plasmid DNA into the body’s host genome, resulting in mutations, problems with DNA replication, triggering of autoimmune responses, and activation of cancer-causing genes.
mRNA vaccines
Because mRNA vaccines are “particularly suited to speedy development,” it is perhaps unsurprising that they are attracting attention as the “coronavirus frontrunners.” mRNA vaccines can reportedly generate savings of “months or years to standardize and ramp up . . . mass production.” Making lemonade out of lemons, insiders casually state that “while no mRNA vaccine has ever been licensed, the threat of a pandemic is a great incentive to accelerate their progress.”
Companies are enamored of the mRNA approach despite observations that the large mRNA molecules are “intrinsically unstable,” “prone to degradation” and may overactivate the immune system. On the plus side, from vaccine scientists’ standpoint, mRNA vaccines need only reach the cell cytoplasm rather than the nucleus—an apparently “simpler technical challenge”—although the approach still demands “delivery technologies that can ensure stabilization of mRNA under physiological conditions.” Formulations such as Moderna’s mRNA-1273 vaccine tackle these challenges by using “chemical modifications to stabilize the mRNA” and liquid nanoparticles to “package it into an injectable form.”
mRNA approaches seem to attract researchers with a highly mechanistic view of human beings. One such individual praises mRNA for its “inherent ‘programmability,” stating “Much like [a] computer [operating system], mRNA therapy can reprogram [one’s] body to produce its own therapies” [emphasis in original]. The CEO of Moderna describes mRNA approaches—which use “custom-built” strands of mRNA to “turn the body’s cells into ad hoc drug factories”—as being “like software: You can just turn the crank and get a lot of products going into development.” Likewise, the journal Nature (commenting on mRNA technology from “a biotech and industrial perspective”) enthuses that the approach “allows rapid refinement with almost limitless combinations of derivatives.”
Vaccine researchers familiar with both DNA and mRNA vaccines like to play up mRNA vaccine safety, citing the fact that the vaccines do not have to penetrate the cell nucleus. However, with years of mRNA vaccine experimentation behind them, none of these researchers has yet achieved licensure. Why? One answer may be that in preclinical studies, mRNA vaccines have displayed an “intrinsic” inflammatory component that makes it difficult to establish an “acceptable risk/benefit profile.” mRNA enthusiasts admit that there is, as yet, an inadequate understanding of the inflammation and autoimmune reactions that may result. This raises many questions about what will happen if regulators grant the manufacturers of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines their wish for “a fast-track process to get mRNA vaccines to people sooner.”
Racing toward profits
The hijacking of nearly all economic, social, artistic and religious activity by SARS-CoV-2 is disturbing on many levels, not least because of what it reveals about the public’s uncritical acceptance of official spin and its yearning for medical silver bullets. As a vaccine researcher at Sweden’s Karolinska Institute has stated:
When China quarantined an entire megacity in January, People said “only China can do that.” Then we saw similarly drastic measures in several democratic countries. I think it says something about our trust in medical solutions. Today, we expect to be able to develop medicines and vaccines against different diseases in a way we didn’t in the past.
The rush to develop gene-tampering COVID-19 vaccines is also accelerating the conjoined-twins fusion of pharma and biotech. The lucrative biopharma sector is now the fastest-growing segment of the global drug industry, currently representing 20% of the worldwide market and displaying an annual growth rate that is more than double that of conventional pharma. And COVID-19 vaccines are helping rescue some biopharma companies’ shaky bottom lines. In 2017, for example, Moderna was struggling to “keep afloat its brash promise to reinvent medicine” after an experimental therapy that it was counting on proved too unsafe to test in humans. Fast forward to 2020, when “bad news about the coronavirus is good news for Moderna stock.” Other biopharma companies formerly on the skids are likewise poised to make record profits from COVID-19.
As biopharma pursues its unfettered, medical-ethics-be-damned race toward a COVID-19 pot of gold, the public needs to take a critical look at the industry’s disincentives for safety and also take a firm stand against the horrifying prospect of coronavirus vaccine mandates. Otherwise, genetically engineered COVID-19 vaccines are likely to start permanently altering genes, triggering autoimmunity and serving as the catalyst for other vaccine injuries or deaths, and—unhampered by any legal liability—none of the commercial or government actors responsible will likely care.


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-10--French Doctors Speak Out Against New Contact Tracing As Attack on Right to Medical Privacy

French Doctors Speak Out Against New Contact Tracing A somewhat emotional video from a young practicing physician on Youtube , republished below , alerted us to this topic of medical snooping by the French government in order to allegedly stop / control / monitor the chain of infection ( and us ) .
Overall , this practice may become the next reason why we shouldn ’ t be visiting our family doctor or the local hospital starting from tomorrow , May 11 , when our two-month ( ! )
lockdown officially ends .
An MSM report of the French situation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are two actual doctors giving their feedback , one on video and one anonymously in writing .
Readers may also be interested in this US article by Daisy Luther via Zerohedge on the rollout of contact tracing titled “ Contact Tracer ” And “ Disease Investigator ” Jobs Spring Up Across The Country .
So from tomorrow , the French family doctor ( and the hospital doctor ) will be the initiating person to identify a patient supposedly with covid , ask for the names and contact numbers of those people the patient @ @ @ @ @ @ @ within and without the immediate family ) , enter the information given into a centralized database , and do ( unreliable ) testing on the patient .
At which point the non-medical staff of the French health insurance system will take over and send teams of people to test those contacts , hoping to find patient zero along the way .
The initiating doctors themselves will get 55 euros instead of the regular fee of around 25 euros , plus 2 ( or 4 ) extra euros for each contact name with a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been in France since at least October/November ; confirmed cases were predicted to be going down around the time lockdowns were enforced in France ( March 16 ) and the UK ( March 23 ) ; Public Health England downgraded the severity of the disease on March 19 .
So is this all a case of a system and government justifying themselves to the public when , originally , they did absolutely nothing , telling us via the media that it was a Chinese problem ?
Likely the infection has been doing the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ remains to be seen what kind of spike in cases will happen post-lockdown .
Some government heads are expected to roll following the resumption of ‘ normal ’ life , so they must be anxious to be seen to be doing something .
As well as finding a reason to implement Big Data surveillance systems on us .
The anonymous doctor below raises concerns about doctors being motivated to participate with a fee incentive ; the reliability of the diagnostic tests ( presumably the PCR test ) ; confidentiality of a patient ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
non-medical , staff ; use and security of patient data entered in the system once it ’ s all finished ; retaliation by people named as contacts who may be subject to confinement .
And overall , the ethical problem of doctors turning in their patients to a bigger , data-driven system outside the normal bounds of doctor-patient relationship , as well as turning in names of people to the government who are not even their patients .
The doctor in the very short video below raises some additional points : • @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these cases in and of itself isn ’ t a problem .
• Yet a government bill is in the pipeline to create a new system of health data in the context of this crisis , without our input .
Patient health information can not be kept for more than a year , but it is likely to become a permanent system .
• The national platform of patient data will be kept on Microsoft servers ; the data will be drawn from hospitals , pharmacies , and patient files .
• Will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up for people ?
Will banks refuse loans to people ?
Will employers not re-hire people because their health data is accessible ?
The young guy ’ s overall point below is – I ’ m a doctor , not a cop .
Message from a Doctor Who Wishes to Remain Anonymous ATTENTION !
… TO BE WIDELY DISTRIBUTED !
NEW DRAMATIC DIRECTION IN THE ONGOING MADNESS !
… The total compromise of the SS in this so-called state of emergency , totally falsified and allowing all the most Orwellian excesses !
What @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a communication from the CGT Union of social security funds following a meeting with the national director of the fund , Mr. Nicola Revel , dated May 5 , 2020 .
It concerns the plan to mobilize the fund ’ s administrative employees ( and not the fund ’ s medical personnel , who are supposed to be trained and protect the notion of medical secrecy ! )
to supposedly limit the spread of the post-lockdown virus .
It consists of the creation of a “ brigade ” ( sic ! )
in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 6,500 people at the national level , which they cynically call the “ Guardian Angel Brigade ” BAD ( … Really , what a sense of humour ! )
supposed to carry out large-scale epidemic detection of the famous “ contact cases , ” identified by family doctors on the declaration of their Covid patients .
In order not to get rid of the increasingly invasive anglicisms , it is called “ contact tracing ” !
These agents will be employed 7 days a week , this by freezing their collective agreement , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ eligible for the scheme in question from 8am to 7pm .
I remind us all once again ( we can never hammer it home enough ) that the covid tests have no validity , with a positive predictive value between 30 and 50 % , which means that one can be a carrier of the virus and negative on the test , just as one can be declared positive even without having contracted the virus !
!
It is , however , on this basis that the policing will be carried out with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in high places , it causes no remorse !
The “ contact tracing , ” in fact , is old-fashioned : the family doctor diagnoses an infected patient .
He tests him with a virological test , takes care of him and organizes his confinement as well as that of his close entourage .
3,000 to 5,000 cases will be expected per day starting May 11th according to Santé Publique France .
The doctor registers his patient in Ameli Pro , with his consent within 24 hours .
( ER : Ameli.fr is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in France . )
He receives 55 € , plus 2 € per individual name ( 4 € with a phone number ) entered in Ameli Pro , with whom the patient has been in contact , outside the rules of physical distance and protection .
Mr Revel considers that the professional secrecy to which the employees of the Sécu are bound is sufficient to guarantee data protection .
No details are given on what will happen to the data collected on Ameli Pro after the crisis is over .
On the other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ twin , the SITEP tool ( operated by DGS/AP-HP/Santé Publique France ) will ( together with the results of serological tests carried out in laboratories ) make it possible to carry out epidemiological studies under cover of anonymity .
As the CNIL has not given its opinion on the nature of the files created , it will arrive after the battle .
So much the worse , when it comes to health data , as well as labour law – it is a matter of urgency !
Behind Ameli Pro , the agents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contact the “ contact cases ” by telephone .
Their mission will be to convince everyone to get masks from the pharmacy , do a laboratory test and go into isolation while waiting for the results , with a work stoppage as backup .
In addition to the research and the relationship with the “ contact cases ” , the colleagues will also issue work stoppages .
Patients ( “ patient zero ” ) who are the source of the trace will have the right to have their identity withheld from individuals who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only if they ask their doctor not to check the “ does not wish to be identified ” box in Ameli Pro .
There is a risk there .
If claiming to be a known person ( ER : an ‘ infected ’ person ? )
can make it easier to quarantine a third party , it could lead to retaliatory measures .
There are environments where “ snitching ” is a serious thing .
You have to be aware of this reality when you ’ re doing population tracing .
I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ edifying enough for anyone who still has their common sense .
Not to mention that if medical ethics still had any meaning that was not misused , all doctors would have to resist and oppose the implementation of such a nightmare .
But hey , most of them have seen their incomes drastically reduced during this epidemic !
Yes , they have !
It ’ s strictly attested to !
And so… A big increase in income after a famine , it can be tempting !
!
…

French Doctors Speak Out Against New Contact Tracing
Pam Barker | Director of TLB Europe Reloaded Project
A somewhat emotional video from a young practicing physician on Youtube, republished below, alerted us to this topic of medical snooping by the French government in order to allegedly stop / control / monitor the chain of infection (and us). Overall, this practice may become the next reason why we shouldn’t be visiting our family doctor or the local hospital starting from tomorrow, May 11, when our two-month(!) lockdown officially ends.
An MSM report of the French situation may be found here, but below are two actual doctors giving their feedback, one on video and one anonymously in writing. Readers may also be interested in this US article by Daisy Luther via Zerohedge on the rollout of contact tracing titled “Contact Tracer” And “Disease Investigator” Jobs Spring Up Across The Country.
So from tomorrow, the French family doctor (and the hospital doctor) will be the initiating person to identify a patient supposedly with covid, ask for the names and contact numbers of those people the patient has been in contact with (both within and without the immediate family), enter the information given into a centralized database, and do (unreliable) testing on the patient. At which point the non-medical staff of the French health insurance system will take over and send teams of people to test those contacts, hoping to find patient zero along the way. The initiating doctors themselves will get 55 euros instead of the regular fee of around 25 euros, plus 2 (or 4) extra euros for each contact name with a phone number.
The infection has likely been in France since at least October/November; confirmed cases were predicted to be going down around the time lockdowns were enforced in France (March 16) and the UK (March 23); Public Health England downgraded the severity of the disease on March 19. So is this all a case of a system and government justifying themselves to the public when, originally, they did absolutely nothing, telling us via the media that it was a Chinese problem? Likely the infection has been doing the rounds here for a while although it remains to be seen what kind of spike in cases will happen post-lockdown. Some government heads are expected to roll following the resumption of ‘normal’ life, so they must be anxious to be seen to be doing something. As well as finding a reason to implement Big Data surveillance systems on us.
The anonymous doctor below raises concerns about doctors being motivated to participate with a fee incentive; the reliability of the diagnostic tests (presumably the PCR test); confidentiality of a patient’s medical data by administrative, i.e. non-medical, staff; use and security of patient data entered in the system once it’s all finished; retaliation by people named as contacts who may be subject to confinement. And overall, the ethical problem of doctors turning in their patients to a bigger, data-driven system outside the normal bounds of doctor-patient relationship, as well as turning in names of people to the government who are not even their patients.
The doctor in the very short video below raises some additional points:
Covid is a notifiable disease so reporting these cases in and of itself isn’t a problem. (ER: It is in the UK, too, but should it be? Should covid, with a death rate comparable to ‘flu and mild or no symptoms in the majority of the population, be put in the class of diseases like cholera and TB?) Yet a government bill is in the pipeline to create a new system of health data in the context of this crisis, without our input. Patient health information cannot be kept for more than a year, but it is likely to become a permanent system. The national platform of patient data will be kept on Microsoft servers; the data will be drawn from hospitals, pharmacies, and patient files. Will this result in health insurance costs going up for people? Will banks refuse loans to people? Will employers not re-hire people because their health data is accessible?
The young guy’s overall point below is – I’m a doctor, not a cop.
******
********
Philippe Jandrok’s Blog, 7 May 2020
Message from a Doctor Who Wishes to Remain Anonymous
ATTENTION! … TO BE WIDELY DISTRIBUTED! NEW DRAMATIC DIRECTION IN THE ONGOING MADNESS!…
The total compromise of the SS in this so-called state of emergency, totally falsified and allowing all the most Orwellian excesses!
What I am reporting here is taken from a communication from the CGT Union of social security funds following a meeting with the national director of the fund, Mr. Nicola Revel, dated May 5, 2020.
It concerns the plan to mobilize the fund’s administrative employees (and not the fund’s medical personnel, who are supposed to be trained and protect the notion of medical secrecy!) to supposedly limit the spread of the post-lockdown virus.
It consists of the creation of a “brigade” (sic!) in the form of a telephone platform of 6,500 people at the national level, which they cynically call the “Guardian Angel Brigade” BAD (… Really, what a sense of humour!) supposed to carry out large-scale epidemic detection of the famous “contact cases,” identified by family doctors on the declaration of their Covid patients.
In order not to get rid of the increasingly invasive anglicisms, it is called “contact tracing”!
These agents will be employed 7 days a week, this by freezing their collective agreement, and with compulsory overtime, but not eligible for the scheme in question from 8am to 7pm .
I remind us all once again (we can never hammer it home enough) that the covid tests have no validity, with a positive predictive value between 30 and 50%, which means that one can be a carrier of the virus and negative on the test, just as one can be declared positive even without having contracted the virus!! It is, however, on this basis that the policing will be carried out with an insane stigmatization of anyone!
But in high places, it causes no remorse!
The “contact tracing,” in fact, is old-fashioned: the family doctor diagnoses an infected patient. He tests him with a virological test, takes care of him and organizes his confinement as well as that of his close entourage. 3,000 to 5,000 cases will be expected per day starting May 11th according to Santé Publique France.
The doctor registers his patient in Ameli Pro, with his consent within 24 hours. (ER: Ameli.fr is the website portal for all health insurers in France.)
He receives 55 €, plus 2 € per individual name (4 € with a phone number) entered in Ameli Pro, with whom the patient has been in contact, outside the rules of physical distance and protection.
(ER: From another report, the 55 euros includes the normal 25 euro family doctor consultation fee.)
Mr Revel considers that the professional secrecy to which the employees of the Sécu are bound is sufficient to guarantee data protection. No details are given on what will happen to the data collected on Ameli Pro after the crisis is over.
On the other hand, it is confirmed that its twin, the SITEP tool (operated by DGS/AP-HP/Santé Publique France) will (together with the results of serological tests carried out in laboratories) make it possible to carry out epidemiological studies under cover of anonymity. As the CNIL has not given its opinion on the nature of the files created, it will arrive after the battle. So much the worse, when it comes to health data, as well as labour law – it is a matter of urgency!
Behind Ameli Pro, the agents will take over from the doctor to contact the “contact cases” by telephone. Their mission will be to convince everyone to get masks from the pharmacy, do a laboratory test and go into isolation while waiting for the results, with a work stoppage as backup.
In addition to the research and the relationship with the “contact cases”, the colleagues will also issue work stoppages.
Unanticipated risks to patients zero :
Patients (“patient zero”) who are the source of the trace will have the right to have their identity withheld from individuals who will be identified and quarantined. But only if they ask their doctor not to check the “does not wish to be identified” box in Ameli Pro. There is a risk there.
If claiming to be a known person (ER: an ‘infected’ person?) can make it easier to quarantine a third party, it could lead to retaliatory measures. There are environments where “snitching” is a serious thing. You have to be aware of this reality when you’re doing population tracing.
I’ll stop here. It’s edifying enough for anyone who still has their common sense. Not to mention that if medical ethics still had any meaning that was not misused, all doctors would have to resist and oppose the implementation of such a nightmare. But hey, most of them have seen their incomes drastically reduced during this epidemic! Yes, they have! It’s strictly attested to! And so… A big increase in income after a famine, it can be tempting!!…
********
A quoi vont servir les “brigades sanitaires” anti-coronavirus ?
SUD-OUEST.FR avec AFP


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-10--America’s Super-Rich See Their Wealth Rise by $282 Billion in 3 Weeks of Pandemic

A new report from the Institute for Policy Studies found that , while tens of millions of Americans have lost their jobs during the coronavirus pandemic , America ’ s ultra-wealthy elite have seen their net worth surge by $ 282 billion in just 23 days .
This is despite the fact that the economy is expected to contract by 40 percent this quarter .
The report also noted that between 1980 and 2020 the tax obligations of America ’ s billionaires , measured as a percentage of their wealth , decreased by 79 percent .
In the last 30 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over 1100 percent while median household wealth increased by barely five percent .
In 1990 , the total wealth held by America ’ s billionaire class was $ 240 billion ; today that number stands at $ 2.95 trillion .
Thus , America ’ s billionaires accrued more wealth in just the past three weeks than they made in total prior to 1980 .
As a result , just three people – Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos , Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates and Berkshire Hathaway ’ s Warren Buffet – own as much wealth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ households combined .
The Institute for Policy Studies ’ report paints a picture of a modern day oligarchy , where the super-rich have captured legislative and executive power , controlling what laws are passed .
The report discusses what it labels a new “ wealth defense industry ” – where “ billionaires are paying millions to dodge billions in taxes , ” with teams of accountants , lawyers , lobbyists and asset managers helping them conceal their vast fortunes in tax havens and so-called charitable trusts .
The result has been crippled social @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and even a sustained drop in life expectancy – something rarely seen in history outside of major wars or famines .
Few Americans believe their children will be better off than they were .
Statistics suggest they are right .
Billionaires very theatrically donate a fraction of what they used to give back in taxes , making sure to generate maximum publicity for their actions .
And they secure positive coverage of themselves by stepping in to keep influential news organizations afloat .
A December investigation by MintPress found that Gates had donated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , over $ 3 million to NBC Universal , over $ 4.5 million to NPR , $ 1 million to Al-Jazeera , and a staggering $ 49 million to the BBC ’ s Media Action program .
Some , like Bezos , prefer to simply outright purchase news organizations themselves , changing the editorial stance to unquestioning loyalty to their new owners .
The spike in billionaire wealth comes amid an unprecedented economic crash ; 26.5 million Americans have filed for unemployment over the last five weeks , and that number is expected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the super-rich are holed up in their mansions and yachts , the 49-62 million Americans designated as “ essential workers ” must continue to risk their lives to keep society functioning , even as many of them do not even earn as much as the $ 600 weekly increase in unemployment benefits the CARES act stipulates .
Many low paid workers , such as grocery store employees , have already fallen sick and died .
The mother of one 27-year-old Maryland worker who contracted COVID-19 and died received her daughter ’ s last @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Amazon staff , directly employed by Bezos , also risk their lives for measly pay .
One third of all Amazon workers in Arizona , for example , are enrolled in the food stamps program , their wages so low that they can not afford to pay for food .
The vast contrast in the effect that COVID-19 has had on the super wealthy versus the rest of us has many concluding that billionaires ’ wealth and the poverty of the rest of the world are two sides of the same coin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ still can not afford a house or even to eat is the same reason people like Bezos control more wealth than many countries .
Bezos ’ solution to his employees ’ hunger has been to set up a charity and ask for public donations to help his desperate workers .
The majority of millennials , most of them shut out from attaining the American dream , already prefer socialism to capitalism , taking a dim view of the latter .
The latest news that the billionaire class is laughing all the way to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ economic suffering is unlikely to improve their disposition .

A new report from the Institute for Policy Studies found that, while tens of millions of Americans have lost their jobs during the coronavirus pandemic, America’s ultra-wealthy elite have seen their net worth surge by $282 billion in just 23 days. This is despite the fact that the economy is expected to contract by 40 percent this quarter. The report also noted that between 1980 and 2020 the tax obligations of America’s billionaires, measured as a percentage of their wealth, decreased by 79 percent. In the last 30 years, U.S. billionaire wealth soared by over 1100 percent while median household wealth increased by barely five percent. In 1990, the total wealth held by America’s billionaire class was $240 billion; today that number stands at $2.95 trillion. Thus, America’s billionaires accrued more wealth in just the past three weeks than they made in total prior to 1980. As a result, just three people – Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates and Berkshire Hathaway’s Warren Buffet – own as much wealth as the bottom half of all U.S. households combined.
The Institute for Policy Studies’ report paints a picture of a modern day oligarchy, where the super-rich have captured legislative and executive power, controlling what laws are passed. The report discusses what it labels a new “wealth defense industry” – where “billionaires are paying millions to dodge billions in taxes,” with teams of accountants, lawyers, lobbyists and asset managers helping them conceal their vast fortunes in tax havens and so-called charitable trusts. The result has been crippled social programs and a decrease in living standards and even a sustained drop in life expectancy – something rarely seen in history outside of major wars or famines. Few Americans believe their children will be better off than they were. Statistics suggest they are right.
Faux Generosity: How Bill Gates Bought His Power and Influence Bill Gates is often presented as one of the “good billionaires.” But where do Bill’s billions go? To secure considerable power and influence for starters.
Billionaires very theatrically donate a fraction of what they used to give back in taxes, making sure to generate maximum publicity for their actions. And they secure positive coverage of themselves by stepping in to keep influential news organizations afloat. A December investigation by MintPress found that Gates had donated over $9 million to The Guardian, over $3 million to NBC Universal, over $4.5 million to NPR, $1 million to Al-Jazeera, and a staggering $49 million to the BBC’s Media Action program. Some, like Bezos, prefer to simply outright purchase news organizations themselves, changing the editorial stance to unquestioning loyalty to their new owners.
The spike in billionaire wealth comes amid an unprecedented economic crash; 26.5 million Americans have filed for unemployment over the last five weeks, and that number is expected to continue to rise dramatically. While the super-rich are holed up in their mansions and yachts, the 49-62 million Americans designated as “essential workers” must continue to risk their lives to keep society functioning, even as many of them do not even earn as much as the $600 weekly increase in unemployment benefits the CARES act stipulates. Many low paid workers, such as grocery store employees, have already fallen sick and died. The mother of one 27-year-old Maryland worker who contracted COVID-19 and died received her daughter’s last paycheck. It amounted to $20.64.
Amazon staff, directly employed by Bezos, also risk their lives for measly pay. One third of all Amazon workers in Arizona, for example, are enrolled in the food stamps program, their wages so low that they cannot afford to pay for food. The vast contrast in the effect that COVID-19 has had on the super wealthy versus the rest of us has many concluding that billionaires’ wealth and the poverty of the rest of the world are two sides of the same coin: that the reason people working full-time still cannot afford a house or even to eat is the same reason people like Bezos control more wealth than many countries. Bezos’ solution to his employees’ hunger has been to set up a charity and ask for public donations to help his desperate workers.
Jeff Bezos, World’s Richest Man, Wants Your Donations To Help Amazon Employees Jeff Bezos, the world’s richest man, is asking the public for donations to help Amazon employees weather the COVID-19 (coronavirus) outbreak.
The majority of millennials, most of them shut out from attaining the American dream, already prefer socialism to capitalism, taking a dim view of the latter. The latest news that the billionaire class is laughing all the way to the bank during a period of intense economic suffering is unlikely to improve their disposition.
••••
About the Author: Alan MacLeod is a Staff Writer for MintPress News. After completing his PhD in 2017 he published two books: Bad News From Venezuela: Twenty Years of Fake News and Misreporting and Propaganda in the Information Age: Still Manufacturing Consent. He has also contributed to Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, The Guardian, Salon, The Grayzone, Jacobin Magazine, Common Dreams the American Herald Tribune and The Canary.
••••
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-10--The Continuing Internment of We The People … You Get What You Allow

The Continuing Internment of We The People … You Get What You Allow I am angry … I am VERY ANGRY … to see the absolute internment for so many of We The People for reasons that can not even hold water , yet it is heeded and tolerated !
Anyone who still thinks this is about a virus … a Coronavirus … COVID-19 , is either brain dead , or buried under so much Programmed Ignorance as to appear brain dead to all but themselves ( and others who are also brain dead ) .
So how about a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thinker ( brain ) : • None When the flu season hit last year it killed over 100,000 people in America ( Even the CDC claims over 80,000 deaths ) , why didn ’ t we shut the country down ?
• None Why didn ’ t we start the process of destroying millions of lives then ?
• None Why did the powers that be wait until this year and utilize a virus that is simply weak as hell compared even to last years global flu pandemic ?
• None Why do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ count ( easily proven fact ) … is it to make this pandemic look literally ten times as bad as it actually is ?
• None Why are many doctors and researchers stating that the reported deaths from COVID-19 may be as much as 80-90 % over stated ( so 10,000 to maybe as high as 20,000 actual deaths from COVID-19 ) ?
?
?
• None Why are hospitals getting over three times the reimbursement dollars ( fact ) if a death is blamed on COVID-19 … incentivising false cause of death @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our unalienable rights and constitutional freedoms being negated by tin pot state and local dictators with no regards for the Constitution or the Bill of Rights ?
• None And my most ardent question … Why are We The People not putting a stop to this before all our lives are changed for the worse ( much worse ) … and freedom becomes a word consigned to the scrapheap of obsolete terms … forever ?
?
?
I really want you to watch this ( just over 2 minute ) video , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a serious chill running up your spine … please enjoy your new life … it will NEVER get back to normal … If all we do is sit back and watch , allowing this un-excusable tyranny to continue to happen in so many “ other ” places … unchallenged … then we will never recover and America ’ s enslavement will be all but complete … Then May God have Mercy on Our Unworthy Souls !
!
!
spent about three decades of his adult life either in , or working for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ directly for the Military Industrial Complex facilitating DOD contracts .
His awakening to Political , Economic , and Health realities was less than ten short years ago .
Since that time he has founded The Liberty Beacon Project ( TLB ) consisting of a half dozen proprietary global websites , media projects such as TLBTV , and partner websites across the planet .
He contributes regularly to multiple forums both in and outside of TLB Project .
Most of his work can be found on the TLB Flagship website TheLibertyBeacon.com The Liberty Beacon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

The Continuing Internment of We The People … You Get What You Allow
A Short Rant by: Roger Landry (TLB)
I am angry … I am VERY ANGRY … to see the absolute internment for so many of We The People for reasons that cannot even hold water, yet it is heeded and tolerated! Anyone who still thinks this is about a virus … a Coronavirus … COVID-19, is either brain dead, or buried under so much Programmed Ignorance as to appear brain dead to all but themselves (and others who are also brain dead).
So how about a few questions to help kick-start the old thinker (brain):
When the flu season hit last year it killed over 100,000 people in America (Even the CDC claims over 80,000 deaths), why didn’t we shut the country down ?
Why didn’t we start the process of destroying millions of lives then?
Why did the powers that be wait until this year and utilize a virus that is simply weak as hell compared even to last year’s global flu pandemic ?
Why do they have to pad the COVID-19 death count (easily proven fact) … is it to make this pandemic look literally ten times as bad as it actually is?
Why are many doctors and researchers stating that the reported deaths from COVID-19 may be as much as 80-90% over stated (so 10,000 to maybe as high as 20,000 actual deaths from COVID-19) ???
Why are hospitals getting over three times the reimbursement dollars (fact) if a death is blamed on COVID-19 … incentivising false cause of death reports enormously?
Why are our unalienable rights and constitutional freedoms being negated by tin pot state and local dictators with no regards for the Constitution or the Bill of Rights?
And my most ardent question … Why are We The People not putting a stop to this before all our lives are changed for the worse (much worse) … and freedom becomes a word consigned to the scrapheap of obsolete terms … forever ???
I really want you to watch this (just over 2 minute) video, and if you come away from it without a serious chill running up your spine … please enjoy your new life … it will NEVER get back to normal …
••••
Watch this short but vital video …
If all we do is sit back and watch, allowing this un-excusable tyranny to continue to happen in so many “other” places … unchallenged … then we will never recover and America’s enslavement will be all but complete …
Then May God have Mercy on Our Unworthy Souls !!!
••••
Parting shot …
••••
About the Author: Roger Landry (TLB) spent about three decades of his adult life either in, or working for the military, with about two decades working directly for the Military Industrial Complex facilitating DOD contracts. His awakening to Political, Economic, and Health realities was less than ten short years ago. Since that time he has founded The Liberty Beacon Project (TLB) consisting of a half dozen proprietary global websites, media projects such as TLBTV, and partner websites across the planet. He contributes regularly to multiple forums both in and outside of TLB Project. Most of his work can be found on the TLB Flagship website TheLibertyBeacon.com
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.