thelibertybeacon--2020-04-26--Virus Strikes Media Dumb

Virus Strikes Media Dumb

There ’ s a lot of important news this week which is getting insufficient coverage .
By way of example , we have these developments : • None There are increasingly plausible reports that North Korea ’ s leader Kim Jong-un may be dead , dying , or comatose .
• None General Michael Flynn , in support of his motion that he be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea , filed a new pleading this week .
In it he notes that exculpatory material that he just now tardily received had been deliberately withheld from him , against the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ material supports his motion that he was framed and his son threatened by prosecutors if he did not plead guilty .
He also asserts that his prior counsel urged him to give up dirt on the President.to the prosecutors .
• None Congressman Adam Schiff , an avatar for deceit , continues to withhold the transcripts of 43 interviews of “ Russia collusion ” witnesses his committee had in secret and is blocking declassification of another 10 .
Hiding the evidence allows him to continue to lie about what the witnesses revealed with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 10 for which he ’ s blocking declassification are those of Obama ’ s National Security Adviser Susan Rice and former Ambassador Samantha Powers , two figures deeply involved in unmasking Trump campaign figures who had been unlawfully surveilled under FISA after the DOJ submitted false information to the FISC to open the surveillance .
• None The governors of New York , New Jersey , and California imperiled the most vulnerable to the virus — the elderly in nursing homes ( and their caretakers ) — by ordering virus stricken patients be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hospitals .
In none of these governors ’ many pressers , to my knowledge , were they asked about this policy and why the hell they instituted it .
Surely , there are empty motels which would have better served this purpose .
After all , our latest reports indicate 20 % of the virus fatalities occurred in nursing homes .
Add this to other policy mishaps in these states — cutting the number of scheduled subway runs in New York , for example , assuring that essential workers will be more greatly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to permit stricken nursing home residents from being transferred to the hospital ship in New York .
Instead , we are back to story number one : How to refashion news on the Wuhan virus to attack the President .
As been the case from the beginning , the press is using every foul means to demean him and make this the Trump Virus , ignoring his measured approach and successes .
This week they glommed onto his remarks in a presser that revealed the contagion curve is flattening and diminishing to suggest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ possible remediation — bleach injection – that he had not .
In some cases , they flat-out lied about what he said .
In others they edited the presser video to achieve the same distortion .
Regular readers of this site know a great deal about press information manipulation and lies .
I write this in the hope that you will share it with those others who still don ’ t get it .
Here is the relevant discussion from that presser , transcribed by the Daily Caller : Bill Bryan , Under @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , talked about the half-life of the coronavirus on surfaces like door handles and stainless steel surfaces , saying that when they “ inject ” UV rays into the mix along with high temperatures and increased humidity that the virus dies quickly .
Bryan continued by noting that DHS also tested if certain types of disinfectant could kill the coronavirus .
“ We ’ ve tested bleach , we ’ ve tested isopropyl alcohol on the virus , specifically in saliva or in respiratory fluids , and I can tell you that bleach @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” Bryan said .
“ Isopropyl alcohol will kill the virus in 30 seconds , and that ’ s with no manipulation , no rubbing .
Just bring it on and leaving it go .
You rub it and it goes away even faster.
” … Immediately following these remarks is where Trump states , “ So , I ’ m going to ask Bill a question that probably some of you are thinking of if you ’ re totally into that world , which I find to be very interesting .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ body with a tremendous , whether it ’ s ultraviolet or just very powerful light , and I think you said that hasn ’ t been checked , but you ’ re going to test it .
And then I said supposing you brought the light inside the body , which you can do either through the skin or in some other way .
And I think you said you ’ re going to test that too .
Sounds interesting .
And then I see the disinfectant , where it knocks it out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And is there a way we can do something like that by injection inside or almost a cleaning ?
Because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs , so it ’ d be interesting to check that , so that you ’ re going to have to use medical doctors with , but it sounds interesting to me .
So , we ’ ll see , but the whole concept of the light , the way it kills it in one minute .
That @ @ @ @ @ @ @ moments later , ABC News reporter Jon Karl asked Bryan , “ The president mentioned the idea of a cleaner , bleach and isopropyl alcohol emerging .
There ’ s no scenario where that could be injected into a person , is there ?
” “ No , I ’ m here to talk about the finds that we had in the study , ” Bryan responded .
“ We don ’ t do that within that lab at our labs.
” Trump then clarified his remarks : “ It wouldn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ talking about almost a cleaning and sterilization of an area .
Maybe it works , maybe it doesn ’ t work , but it certainly has a big effect if it ’ s on a stationary object.
” Trump later raised the possibility of whether UV rays could kill the coronavirus if it was on a person ’ s skin , in particular if it were on their hands .
“ If they ’ re outside , right , and their hands are exposed to the sun , will that kill it as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or something else ?
” Trump asked .
“ I don ’ t want to say it will at the same rate because it ’ s a non-porous surface , but what we do know is that we looked at the worst case scenario and the virus lives longer on non-porous surfaces , ” Bryan responded .
“ So porous surfaces , it doesn ’ t live quite as long , so in theory what you said is correct.
” From this exchange , the media reported the president was advising people inject @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Adams , nailed the nonsensical interpretation of these remarks : There ’ s a massive IQ test on the Internet today .
If you think the president was asking Dr. Birx about injecting bleach or isopropyl alcohol into coronavirus patients — because it sounded that way to you — you failed the test .
CNN ran an ad promoting this disingenuous poppycock : and Nancy Pelosi lied claiming that the President had said people should kill the virus by injecting Lysol .
In fact , the president ’ s reference was to Ultraviolet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the news and Dr Birx was unfamiliar with it .
Here ’ s how it works .
As for other means of disinfecting Virus patients besides the ultraviolet healight others are exploring such things as controlled ethanol vapor inhalation .
Respirators do not seem to work well , and other technologies are being utilized and explored .
Instead of realizing that the president ( who seems to work 24 hours a day trying to keep abreast of such things ) knew more about these developments than Dr. Brix ( or they ) did @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Media operations are failing in droves and deserve this fate .
The above article ( Virus Strikes Media Dumb ) was created and published by American Thinker and is republished here under “ Fair Use ” ( see disclaimer below ) with attribution to the articles author Clarice Feldman and americanthinker.com .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

Virus Strikes Media Dumb
By: Clarice Feldman
There’s a lot of important news this week which is getting insufficient coverage. By way of example, we have these developments:
There are increasingly plausible reports that North Korea’s leader Kim Jong-un may be dead, dying, or comatose.
General Michael Flynn, in support of his motion that he be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea, filed a new pleading this week. In it he notes that exculpatory material that he just now tardily received had been deliberately withheld from him, against the mandate of the Brady case. This material supports his motion that he was framed and his son threatened by prosecutors if he did not plead guilty. He also asserts that his prior counsel urged him to give up dirt on the President.to the prosecutors.
Congressman Adam Schiff, an avatar for deceit, continues to withhold the transcripts of 43 interviews of “Russia collusion” witnesses his committee had in secret and is blocking declassification of another 10. Hiding the evidence allows him to continue to lie about what the witnesses revealed with no possibility of contradiction. Among the 10 for which he’s blocking declassification are those of Obama’s National Security Adviser Susan Rice and former Ambassador Samantha Powers, two figures deeply involved in unmasking Trump campaign figures who had been unlawfully surveilled under FISA after the DOJ submitted false information to the FISC to open the surveillance.
The governors of New York, New Jersey, and California imperiled the most vulnerable to the virus — the elderly in nursing homes (and their caretakers) — by ordering virus stricken patients be housed in nursing homes after transport from hospitals. In none of these governors’ many pressers, to my knowledge, were they asked about this policy and why the hell they instituted it. Surely, there are empty motels which would have better served this purpose. After all, our latest reports indicate 20% of the virus fatalities occurred in nursing homes. Add this to other policy mishaps in these states — cutting the number of scheduled subway runs in New York, for example, assuring that essential workers will be more greatly endangered in packed cars, and refusing to permit stricken nursing home residents from being transferred to the hospital ship in New York.
Instead, we are back to story number one: How to refashion news on the Wuhan virus to attack the President. As been the case from the beginning, the press is using every foul means to demean him and make this the Trump Virus, ignoring his measured approach and successes.
This week they glommed onto his remarks in a presser that revealed the contagion curve is flattening and diminishing to suggest that Trump had called for something as possible remediation — bleach injection – that he had not. In some cases, they flat-out lied about what he said. In others they edited the presser video to achieve the same distortion.
Regular readers of this site know a great deal about press information manipulation and lies. I write this in the hope that you will share it with those others who still don’t get it.
Here is the relevant discussion from that presser, transcribed by the Daily Caller:
Bill Bryan, Under Secretary for Science and Technology at DHS, talked about the half-life of the coronavirus on surfaces like door handles and stainless steel surfaces, saying that when they “inject” UV rays into the mix along with high temperatures and increased humidity that the virus dies quickly. Bryan continued by noting that DHS also tested if certain types of disinfectant could kill the coronavirus. “We’ve tested bleach, we’ve tested isopropyl alcohol on the virus, specifically in saliva or in respiratory fluids, and I can tell you that bleach will kill the virus in five minutes,” Bryan said. “Isopropyl alcohol will kill the virus in 30 seconds, and that’s with no manipulation, no rubbing. Just bring it on and leaving it go. You rub it and it goes away even faster.”… Immediately following these remarks is where Trump states, “So, I’m going to ask Bill a question that probably some of you are thinking of if you’re totally into that world, which I find to be very interesting. So, supposing when we hit the body with a tremendous, whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light, and I think you said that hasn’t been checked, but you’re going to test it. And then I said supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way. And I think you said you’re going to test that too. Sounds interesting. And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute, one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that by injection inside or almost a cleaning? Because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs, so it’d be interesting to check that, so that you’re going to have to use medical doctors with, but it sounds interesting to me. So, we’ll see, but the whole concept of the light, the way it kills it in one minute. That’s pretty powerful.” A few moments later, ABC News reporter Jon Karl asked Bryan, “The president mentioned the idea of a cleaner, bleach and isopropyl alcohol emerging. There’s no scenario where that could be injected into a person, is there?” “No, I’m here to talk about the finds that we had in the study,” Bryan responded. “We don’t do that within that lab at our labs.” Trump then clarified his remarks: “It wouldn’t be through injections, you’re talking about almost a cleaning and sterilization of an area. Maybe it works, maybe it doesn’t work, but it certainly has a big effect if it’s on a stationary object.” Trump later raised the possibility of whether UV rays could kill the coronavirus if it was on a person’s skin, in particular if it were on their hands. “If they’re outside, right, and their hands are exposed to the sun, will that kill it as though it were a piece of metal or something else?” Trump asked. “I don’t want to say it will at the same rate because it’s a non-porous surface, but what we do know is that we looked at the worst case scenario and the virus lives longer on non-porous surfaces,” Bryan responded. “So porous surfaces, it doesn’t live quite as long, so in theory what you said is correct.”
From this exchange, the media reported the president was advising people inject bleach to kill the virus.
Scott Adams, nailed the nonsensical interpretation of these remarks: 1@ScottAdamsSays There’s a massive IQ test on the Internet today. If you think the president was asking Dr. Birx about injecting bleach or isopropyl alcohol into coronavirus patients — because it sounded that way to you — you failed the test. CNN ran an ad promoting this disingenuous poppycock: and Nancy Pelosi lied claiming that the President had said people should kill the virus by injecting Lysol. In fact, the president’s reference was to Ultraviolet catheter technology. It was recently in the news and Dr Birx was unfamiliar with it. Here’s how it works. As for other means of disinfecting Virus patients besides the ultraviolet healight others are exploring such things as controlled ethanol vapor inhalation. Respirators do not seem to work well, and other technologies are being utilized and explored. Instead of realizing that the president (who seems to work 24 hours a day trying to keep abreast of such things) knew more about these developments than Dr. Brix (or they) did, they distorted and mocked his work. Media operations are failing in droves and deserve this fate. •••• The above article (Virus Strikes Media Dumb) was created and published by American Thinker and is republished here under “Fair Use” (see disclaimer below) with attribution to the articles author Clarice Feldman and americanthinker.com. •••• •••• Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-04-26--Creation of a Pandemic & COVID-19 Anti-Trust Argument

In the following video David breaks down his methods of research to equip inquiry ; linguistic genomic , intent based communication analysis ; language as code ; the brain fills in meaning , language is boundaries and pointers ; intelligence gathering ; innovation literacy ; We then go into the background of this anomalous era since 1944 , and the 730 people at Bretton Woods , who brokered the multi-lateral structure of the global order ; dependency on the $ US ; the eugenic movement and its scientific focus on genetics ; the myth of “ novel ” SARS/coronavirus-2 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what/where did corona virus come ?
CDC filed patents in 2003 on human transmission of the “ novel coronavirus ” ; rendered into the human unconscious ; the CDC patent is about to expire ; University of North Carolina Chapel Hill in 2016 chimeric modification of corona virus ; $ 100 millions in grants deployed to research derivative genetic products via CDC and its associate institutions ; how ubiquitous digital media is being used to “ pump ” information to control behaviors and responses ; David states , in his opinion that , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the very revaluation of our values—whether we will allow a significant reduction of our quality of life ?
The CDC , Johns Hopkins , Imperial College in the UK , UNCCH , et al.have colluded to create a story about COVID-19 that this total quarantine of over 3 billion people is justified .
This is a cover-up for a massive social engineering adventure and the financial fraud ongoing since 2008 forward .
David summarizes with showing how the trade war with China reflects the weakness of the US economic system , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ post-multi-lateral economy .
Some of this information was submitted to the Office of the Inspector General for the United States Department of Health and Human Services on April 22 , 2020 Citizens of the United States of America United States Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Governors of All States Issuing Executive Orders abridging the 1st Amendment of the Constitution On April 25 , 2003 , the United States Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( hereinafter , “ CDC ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ States ( Application Number US46592703P , subsequently issued as U.S. Patent 7,776,521 ) entitled “ Coronavirus isolated from humans ” .
Claim 3 –A method of detecting a severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus ( SARS-CoV ) in a sample… ; and , Claim 4 – A kit for detecting a severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus ( SARS-CoV ) in a sample… , provided the CDC with a statutory market exclusion right the detection of and sampling for severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus ( SARS-CoV ) .
Securing this right afforded the CDC exclusive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or block others from conducting activities involving SARS-CoV .
On September 24 , 2018 , the CDC failed to pay the required maintenance fees on this patent and their rights expired .
From April 2003 until September 2018 , the CDC owned SARS-CoV , its ability to be detected and the ability to manufacture kits for its assessment .
During this 15-year period , the effect of the grant of this right – ruled unconstitutional in 2013 by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Association for Molecular Pathology et al @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the commercial exploitation of any research or commercial activity in the United States involving SARS-CoV would constitute an infringement of CDC ’ s illegal patent .
It appears that , during the period of patent enforcement and after the Supreme Court ruling confirming that patents on genetic material was illegal , the CDC and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases led by Anthony Fauci ( hereinafter “ NIAID ” and “ Dr Fauci ” , respectively ) entered into trade among States ( including , but not limited to working with Ecohealth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( specifically , the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Chinese Academy of Sciences ) through the 2014 et seq National Institutes of Health Grant R01AI110964 to exploit their patent rights .
It further appears that , during the period of patent enforcement and after the Supreme Court ruling confirming that patents on genetic material were illegal , the CDC and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ( hereinafter “ NIAID ” ) entered into trade among States ( including , but not limited to working with University of North Carolina , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( specifically , the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Chinese Academy of Sciences represented by Zheng-Li Shi ) through U19AI109761 ( Ralph S. Baric ) , U19AI107810 ( Ralph S. Baric ) , and National Natural Science Foundation of China Award 81290341 ( Zheng-Li Shi ) et al .
It further appears that , during the period of patent enforcement and after the Supreme Court ruling confirming that patents on genetic material was illegal , the CDC and NIAID entered into trade among States ( including , but not limited to working @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hill ) and with foreign nations to conduct chimeric construction of novel coronavirus material with specific virulence properties prior to , during , and following the determination made by the National Institutes for Health in October 17 , 2014 that this work was not sufficiently understood for its biosecurity and safety standards .
In this inquiry , it is presumed that the CDC and its associates were : a ) fully aware of the work being performed using their patented technology ; b ) entered into explicit or implicit agreements including licensing , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) willfully engaged one or more foreign interests to carry forward the exploitation of their proprietary technology when the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that such patents were illegal and when the National Institutes of Health issued a moratorium on such research .
The aforementioned items appear to constitute , “ contract , combination in the form of trust or otherwise , or conspiracy , ” as defined under 15 US Code § 1 .
Under 15 U.S. Code § 1 ( the Sherman Antitrust Act ) “ Every contract , combination in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conspiracy , in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States , or with foreign nations , is declared to be illegal .
Every person who shall make any contract or engage in any combination or conspiracy hereby declared to be illegal shall be deemed guilty of a felony , and , on conviction thereof , shall be punished by fine not exceeding $ 100,000,000 if a corporation , or , if any other person , $ 1,000,000 , or by imprisonment not exceeding 10 years , or by both said punishments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Reportedly , in January 2018 , the U.S. Embassy in China sent investigators to Wuhan Institute of Virology and found that , “ During interactions with scientists at the WIV laboratory , they noted the new lab has a serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate this high-containment laboratory.
” The Washington Post reported that this information was contained in a cable dated 19 January 2018 .
Over a year later , in June 2019 , the CDC conducted an inspection of Fort Detrick ’ s U.S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( hereinafter “ USAMRIID ” ) and ordered it closed after alleging that their inspection found biosafety hazards .
A report in the journal Nature in 2003 ( 423 ( 6936 ) : 103 ) reported cooperation between CDC and USAMRIID on coronavirus research followed by considerable subsequent collaboration .
The CDC , for what appear to be the same type of concern identified in Wuhan , elected to continue work with the Chinese government while closing the U.S. Army facility .
Reportedly , on December 31 , 2019 , the Chinese government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) that a number of cases of suspected coronavirus-associated SARS cases were being treated in the area of Wuhan .
The CDC reported the first case of SARS-CoV like illness in the United States in January 2020 with the CDC ’ s Epidemic Intelligence Service reporting 650 clinical cases and 210 tests .
Given that the suspected pathogen was first implicated in official reports on December 31 , 2019 , one can only conclude that CDC : a ) had the mechanism and wherewithal to conduct tests to confirm the existence of a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ b ) did not have said mechanism and falsely reported the information in January .
It tests credulity to suggest that the WHO or the CDC could manufacture and distribute tests for a “ novel ” pathogen when their own subsequent record on development and deployment of tests has been shown to be without reliability .
Notwithstanding , the CDC and WHO elected to commit to a narrative of a novel coronavirus – exhibiting properties that were anticipated in the U.S. Patent 7,618,802 issued to the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the absence of testing protocols , elected to insist that SARS-CoV-2 was the pathogen responsible for conditions that were consistent with moderate to severe acute respiratory syndrome .
On March 4 , 2020 , California Governor Gavin Newsome appears to have violated the law of the State of California by issuing Executive Order N-33-20 based on the “ threat of COVID-19 ” with no evidence that such threat existed as confirmed by serology or confirmed immunologic evidence .
The Government Code sections cited in the Order ( Government Code sections 8567 , 8627 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be met which do not include the “ threat ” of any condition but evidence of said condition .
At that time , neither the CDC nor the WHO had sufficient testing in place to : a ) confirm and isolate “ a novel coronavirus ” from other coronaviruses ; b ) California did not have pathology data to suggest that an epidemic was imminent ; and , c ) the rest of the United States was equally incapable of making any such assessment as a result of the aforementioned conspiring parties actions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , followed by numerous other similar orders , all are based on the threat of a thing that may or may not exist .
Around March 12 , 2020 , in an effort to enrich their own economic interests by way of securing additional funding from both Federal and Foundation actors , the CDC and NIAID ’ s Dr Fauci elected to suspend testing and classify COVID-19 by capricious symptom presentation alone.Not surprisingly , this was necessitated by the apparent fall in cases that constituted Dr. Fauci ’ s and others ’ criteria @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rights .
At present , the standard according to the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Interim-20-ID-01 for COVID-19 classification is : In outpatient or telehealth settings at least two of the following symptoms : fever ( measured or subjective ) , chills , rigors , myalgia , headache , sore throat , new olfactory and taste disorder ( s ) at least one of the following symptoms : cough , shortness of breath , or difficulty breathing OR Severe respiratory illness with at least one of the following : • None Clinical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ AND No alternative more likely diagnosis • None Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a clinical specimen using a molecular amplification detection test .
• None Detection of specific antibody in serum , plasma , or whole blood indicative of a new or recent infection .
* *serologic methods for diagnosis are currently being defined After inflicting grave harm to the citizens of the United States of America in economic hardships resulting from their allegation of an “ epidemic ” or “ pandemic ” , the CDC and the NIAID set forth , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ various Governors in the respective States promulgated , standards for lifting conditions in violation of the 1st Amendment to the Constitution that serve exclusively to enrich them .
Both the presence of a vaccine or treatment and , or , the development of testing – both that solely benefit the possible conspiring parties and their co-conspirators – are set as a condition for re-opening the country .
This appears to be an unambiguous violation of the Sherman Act and , if so , should be prosecuted immediately to the full extent of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ request .

OffPlanet Media Video: Creation of a Pandemic / Guest – David Martin
(This info/video is republished here by contribution from OffPlanet Media)
In the following video David breaks down his methods of research to equip inquiry; linguistic genomic, intent based communication analysis; language as code; the brain fills in meaning, language is boundaries and pointers; intelligence gathering; innovation literacy; We then go into the background of this anomalous era since 1944, and the 730 people at Bretton Woods, who brokered the multi-lateral structure of the global order; dependency on the $US; the eugenic movement and its scientific focus on genetics; the myth of “novel” SARS/coronavirus-2, branded as COVID-19; “from” what/where did corona virus come?
CDC filed patents in 2003 on human transmission of the “novel coronavirus”; rendered into the human unconscious; the CDC patent is about to expire; University of North Carolina Chapel Hill in 2016 chimeric modification of corona virus; $100 millions in grants deployed to research derivative genetic products via CDC and its associate institutions; how ubiquitous digital media is being used to “pump” information to control behaviors and responses; David states, in his opinion that, we are being forced into a test on the very revaluation of our values—whether we will allow a significant reduction of our quality of life?
The CDC, Johns Hopkins, Imperial College in the UK, UNCCH, et al.have colluded to create a story about COVID-19 that this total quarantine of over 3 billion people is justified. This is a cover-up for a massive social engineering adventure and the financial fraud ongoing since 2008 forward. David summarizes with showing how the trade war with China reflects the weakness of the US economic system, and how China itself is re-positioning in a post-multi-lateral economy.

Related Links:
https://www.davidmartin.world/
http://www.invertedalchemy.com/
https://www.youtube.com/user/walesy6161
The film, Future Dreaming with Dr. David E. Martin:
https://youtu.be/0Wmtjnp-7wg
••••
Related Article:
COVID-19 Anti-Trust Argument
Some of this information was submitted to the Office of the Inspector General for the United States Department of Health and Human Services on April 22, 2020
Request for Investigation – Possible Sherman Act Violation
Citizens of the United States of America
v.
United States Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Robert R Redfield, et al.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Anthony Stephen Fauci, et al.
Governors of All States Issuing Executive Orders abridging the 1st Amendment of the Constitution
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Professor Ralph Baric, et al.
And unknown Parties
On April 25, 2003, the United States Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (hereinafter, “CDC”) filed an application for a United States (Application Number US46592703P, subsequently issued as U.S. Patent 7,776,521) entitled “Coronavirus isolated from humans”. Claim 3 –A method of detecting a severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in a sample…; and, Claim 4 – A kit for detecting a severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in a sample…, provided the CDC with a statutory market exclusion right the detection of and sampling for severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV). Securing this right afforded the CDC exclusive right to research, commercially exploit, or block others from conducting activities involving SARS-CoV. On September 24, 2018, the CDC failed to pay the required maintenance fees on this patent and their rights expired.
From April 2003 until September 2018, the CDC owned SARS-CoV, its ability to be detected and the ability to manufacture kits for its assessment. During this 15-year period, the effect of the grant of this right – ruled unconstitutional in 2013 by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Association for Molecular Pathology et al. v. Myriad Genetics – meant that the commercial exploitation of any research or commercial activity in the United States involving SARS-CoV would constitute an infringement of CDC’s illegal patent.
It appears that, during the period of patent enforcement and after the Supreme Court ruling confirming that patents on genetic material was illegal, the CDC and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases led by Anthony Fauci (hereinafter “NIAID” and “Dr Fauci”, respectively) entered into trade among States (including, but not limited to working with Ecohealth Alliance Inc.) and with foreign nations (specifically, the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Chinese Academy of Sciences) through the 2014 et seq National Institutes of Health Grant R01AI110964 to exploit their patent rights.
It further appears that, during the period of patent enforcement and after the Supreme Court ruling confirming that patents on genetic material were illegal, the CDC and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (hereinafter “NIAID”) entered into trade among States (including, but not limited to working with University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill) and with foreign nations (specifically, the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Chinese Academy of Sciences represented by Zheng-Li Shi) through U19AI109761 (Ralph S. Baric), U19AI107810 (Ralph S. Baric), and National Natural Science Foundation of China Award 81290341 (Zheng-Li Shi) et al.
It further appears that, during the period of patent enforcement and after the Supreme Court ruling confirming that patents on genetic material was illegal, the CDC and NIAID entered into trade among States (including, but not limited to working with University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill) and with foreign nations to conduct chimeric construction of novel coronavirus material with specific virulence properties prior to, during, and following the determination made by the National Institutes for Health in October 17, 2014 that this work was not sufficiently understood for its biosecurity and safety standards.
In this inquiry, it is presumed that the CDC and its associates were: a) fully aware of the work being performed using their patented technology; b) entered into explicit or implicit agreements including licensing, or other consideration; and, c) willfully engaged one or more foreign interests to carry forward the exploitation of their proprietary technology when the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that such patents were illegal and when the National Institutes of Health issued a moratorium on such research.
The aforementioned items appear to constitute, “contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy,” as defined under 15 US Code § 1.
Under 15 U.S. Code § 1 (the Sherman Antitrust Act) “Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal. Every person who shall make any contract or engage in any combination or conspiracy hereby declared to be illegal shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding $100,000,000 if a corporation, or, if any other person, $1,000,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding 10 years, or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the court.”
Reportedly, in January 2018, the U.S. Embassy in China sent investigators to Wuhan Institute of Virology and found that, “During interactions with scientists at the WIV laboratory, they noted the new lab has a serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate this high-containment laboratory.” The Washington Post reported that this information was contained in a cable dated 19 January 2018. Over a year later, in June 2019, the CDC conducted an inspection of Fort Detrick’s U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (hereinafter “USAMRIID”) and ordered it closed after alleging that their inspection found biosafety hazards. A report in the journal Nature in 2003 (423(6936): 103) reported cooperation between CDC and USAMRIID on coronavirus research followed by considerable subsequent collaboration. The CDC, for what appear to be the same type of concern identified in Wuhan, elected to continue work with the Chinese government while closing the U.S. Army facility.
Reportedly, on December 31, 2019, the Chinese government informed the World Health Organization (WHO) that a number of cases of suspected coronavirus-associated SARS cases were being treated in the area of Wuhan. The CDC reported the first case of SARS-CoV like illness in the United States in January 2020 with the CDC’s Epidemic Intelligence Service reporting 650 clinical cases and 210 tests. Given that the suspected pathogen was first implicated in official reports on December 31, 2019, one can only conclude that CDC: a) had the mechanism and wherewithal to conduct tests to confirm the existence of a “novel coronavirus”; or, b) did not have said mechanism and falsely reported the information in January. It tests credulity to suggest that the WHO or the CDC could manufacture and distribute tests for a “novel” pathogen when their own subsequent record on development and deployment of tests has been shown to be without reliability.
Notwithstanding, the CDC and WHO elected to commit to a narrative of a novel coronavirus – exhibiting properties that were anticipated in the U.S. Patent 7,618,802 issued to the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill’s Ralph Baric – and, in the absence of testing protocols, elected to insist that SARS-CoV-2 was the pathogen responsible for conditions that were consistent with moderate to severe acute respiratory syndrome.
On March 4, 2020, California Governor Gavin Newsome appears to have violated the law of the State of California by issuing Executive Order N-33-20 based on the “threat of COVID-19” with no evidence that such threat existed as confirmed by serology or confirmed immunologic evidence. The Government Code sections cited in the Order (Government Code sections 8567, 8627, and 8665) require that criteria be met which do not include the “threat” of any condition but evidence of said condition. At that time, neither the CDC nor the WHO had sufficient testing in place to: a) confirm and isolate “a novel coronavirus” from other coronaviruses; b) California did not have pathology data to suggest that an epidemic was imminent; and, c) the rest of the United States was equally incapable of making any such assessment as a result of the aforementioned conspiring parties actions. Governor Newsome’s Executive Order, followed by numerous other similar orders, all are based on the threat of a thing that may or may not exist.
Around March 12, 2020, in an effort to enrich their own economic interests by way of securing additional funding from both Federal and Foundation actors, the CDC and NIAID’s Dr Fauci elected to suspend testing and classify COVID-19 by capricious symptom presentation alone.Not surprisingly, this was necessitated by the apparent fall in cases that constituted Dr. Fauci’s and others’ criteria for depriving citizens of their 1st Amendment rights. At present, the standard according to the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Interim-20-ID-01 for COVID-19 classification is:
In outpatient or telehealth settings at least two of the following symptoms: fever (measured or subjective), chills, rigors, myalgia, headache, sore throat, new olfactory and taste disorder(s)
OR
at least one of the following symptoms: cough, shortness of breath, or difficulty breathing OR Severe respiratory illness with at least one of the following:
Clinical or radiographic evidence of pneumonia, or
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
AND No alternative more likely diagnosis
Laboratory Criteria for Reporting
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a clinical specimen using a molecular amplification detection test.
Detection of specific antigen in a clinical specimen.
Detection of specific antibody in serum, plasma, or whole blood indicative of a new or recent infection.* *serologic methods for diagnosis are currently being defined
After inflicting grave harm to the citizens of the United States of America in economic hardships resulting from their allegation of an “epidemic” or “pandemic”, the CDC and the NIAID set forth, and the President of the United States and various Governors in the respective States promulgated, standards for lifting conditions in violation of the 1st Amendment to the Constitution that serve exclusively to enrich them. Both the presence of a vaccine or treatment and, or, the development of testing – both that solely benefit the possible conspiring parties and their co-conspirators – are set as a condition for re-opening the country. This appears to be an unambiguous violation of the Sherman Act and, if so, should be prosecuted immediately to the full extent of the law.
Additional information is available upon request.
Submitted this 22nd of April, 2020
Dr. David E. Martin – all Whistleblower Rights and Protections Reserved
••••
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-04-26--Gates & Company’s COVID-19 Vaccine Boosterism Ignores Significant SARS Coronavirus Vaccine Risks Kno

Gates & Company’s COVID-19 Vaccine Boosterism Ignores Significant SARS Coronavirus Vaccine Risks Known for Over a Decade

Written & contributed to TLB by : The Children ’ s Health Defense Team Just as COVID-19 ( reportedly caused by the new coronavirus , SARS-CoV-2 ) has dominated the news cycle in 2020 , so , too , the focus on an eventual coronavirus vaccine has crowded out needed attention to a wider range of prevention and treatment strategies .
Self-appointed pandemic guru Bill Gates—through a complex tangle of direct and indirect funding mechanisms that includes being the World Health Organization ’ s ( WHO ’ s ) second largest donor—is gleefully leading the contingent promoting planet-wide coronavirus vaccination @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is the only thing that will allow us to return to normal.
” Gates has the effrontery to make such claims despite financial conflicts of interest blatant enough to be noticed even by the credulous , and a lengthy trail of vaccine-related destruction left in the wake of Gates-funded vaccine programs around the world .
Globally , roughly 70 COVID-19 vaccines are in various stages of development—a veritable gold rush that will be all the more lucrative since Gates has made sure that the vaccines will be indemnified against lawsuits .
Gates funding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Foundation and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations ( CEPI ) , is helping to spur the accelerated development of some of the leading contenders , including two of the three experimental vaccines rushed into Phase I trials in humans without any preliminary testing in animal models .
( A third experimental vaccine will soon proceed to Phase II trials in China . )
The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ( NIAID ) is running the trial of one of these vaccines ( mRNA-1273 ) , co-developed under CEPI sponsorship with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pennsylvania-based Inovio Pharmaceuticals is conducting a Phase I trial of INO-4800 , a vaccine being developed with massive infusions of funding from both the Gates Foundation and CEPI .
In early April , Dr. Jerome H. Kim ( Director General of the United-Nations-affiliated International Vaccine Institute ) called attention to the “ unprecedented speed ” with which the Phase I trials launched , stating that it will be difficult to know whether a vaccine developed in a scant four , 12 or even 18 months “ is really safe ” and noting that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from five to ten years .
Although striving for enthusiasm about the “ remarkable ” speed-up , Kim warned that even when vaccine makers appropriately begin the process with animal studies , “ vaccine development is characterized by a high failure rate of ‘ often 93 % .
’ ” Dr. Kim ’ s words of warning are far from theoretical .
In the mid-to-late 2000s , scientists engaged in an ultimately futile effort to develop a vaccine to address the first SARS-related coronavirus ( SARS-CoV ) .
Researchers of the day developed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ animal models and two ( described in 2007 and 2008 ) that proceeded to Phase I trials in humans .
The less-than-reassuring results of the animal studies , in particular , prompted one set of researchers to conclude that “ Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated ” [ emphasis added ] .
In 2012 , Texas researchers with combined expertise in molecular virology , microbiology , immunology , biodefense and emerging diseases reported in the journal PLoS ONE on their evaluation—in mice—of four candidate vaccines designed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had run into trouble in earlier experimental studies , which showed that the vaccines had a tendency to induce pathologic lung reactions in the unfortunate recipients—whether mice , ferrets or nonhuman primates .
The Texas scientists reevaluated the safety , immunogenicity and efficacy of two whole-virus vaccines prepared in Vero tissue or Vero cell cultures ( from African green monkey kidney ) ; one recombinant ( genetically engineered ) DNA spike protein vaccine produced in insect cells ; and their own virus-like particle ( VLP ) vaccine containing SARS-CoV proteins as well as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ versions of the vaccines containing an aluminum adjuvant with adjuvant-free formulations .
The research team injected the experimental groups of mice with vaccine on days zero and 28 , exposed them to live SARS-CoV on day 56 and sacrificed them two days later ( day 58 ) to examine the lungs for virus and histopathology , comparing the experimental mice to control groups .
All four vaccines appeared to induce antibodies against SARS-CoV two days after exposure to live virus .
However , the second set of results—the findings that persuaded the researchers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to human testing—showed that all of the vaccinated mice , irrespective of the type of vaccine or the presence or absence of aluminum adjuvant , displayed unique lung damage not seen in the control mice , and the pathology occurred in the absence of any detectable SARS coronavirus in the lungs .
The researchers described this “ Th2-type immunopathology ” —indicated in part by abnormal levels of white blood cells called eosinophils—as suggestive of vaccine-induced “ hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components.
” To explain their findings , the Texas researchers pointed to studies showing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , in the 1960s , received vaccines for respiratory syncytial virus ( RSV ) .
That body of research found that the RSV vaccine “ stimulated an unbalanced immune response ” that “ potentiated ” disease in the vaccine recipients upon subsequent exposure to RSV , often leading to hospitalization and sometimes leading to death .
Given that the very basis for developing a SARS vaccine was to protect vaccine recipients from infectious SARS-CoV , the Texas researchers concluded that a vaccine that instead elicited an immunopathologic reaction ( as had occurred in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was cause for concern .
More recently , in 2016 , scientists expressed similar worries when children in the Philippines developed serious complications or died after receiving a vaccine to protect against dengue disease .
Far from protecting the children , the vaccine dramatically worsened risks of severe complications in children exposed to dengue after vaccination .
The deaths of roughly 600 children are now under criminal investigation .
Two other worries highlighted by the Texas researchers in 2012 are worth mentioning in light of today ’ s COVID-19 context .
First , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ human coronaviruses , the researchers suggested that their results raised important questions about the “ safety of vaccinated persons exposed to other coronaviruses.
” Second , they noted that although the two Phase I clinical trials of SARS-CoV vaccines in humans had reported the vaccines to “ induce antibody responses and to be ‘ safe , ’ .
.
.
the evidence for safety [ was ] for a short period of observation.
” Today , knowing that even the WHO ’ s top experts are questioning how vaccine safety gets evaluated , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trials will be able to address SARS-CoV safety concerns to any meaningful degree .
Bill Gates and his foundation have longstanding ties with the good-cop/bad-cop duo that has been headlining the official COVID-19 narrative : Dr. Anthony Fauci , long-time NIAID director , and physician and retired Army colonel Dr. Deborah Birx , U.S .
Global AIDS Coordinator and Special Representative for Global Health Diplomacy .
It is noteworthy that the two government doctors are long-time allies , having cut their professional teeth working “ side by side ” on the AIDS epidemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ paths ever since .
With HIV vaccine patents to both their names , neither Birx nor Fauci is a stranger to the lure and potential profits involved in vaccine development—regardless of whether the vaccine ever pans out .
In the early 2000s , Birx was one of the lead investigators of an HIV vaccine clinical trial in Thailand .
Although the trial ’ s methodology and results drew severe criticism , Birx and others—including Fauci—spun the study as a success .
As her reward , Birx then spent the next ten years directing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ HIV/AIDS .
In 2016 , Fauci and NIAID dished out more taxpayer money to test the same HIV vaccine all over again in South Africa , but NIAID had to call a halt to the study in February 2020 , when an interim review found that the vaccine was worthless .
Around the same time as the Thai vaccine trial , Fauci was active as one of the “ principal architects ” of the 2003 President ’ s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief ( PEPFAR ) , a still-ongoing program that has since @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it coordinates ( across seven different U.S. departments and agencies ) promotion of HIV drugs and other measures .
Since 2014 , PEPFAR has been led by none other than Birx , who has been only too happy to accept generous Gates Foundation support .
The foundation is the top source of philanthropic funding for all international HIV efforts , and development of an HIV vaccine remains one of its core “ areas of focus.
” In the face of recent Trump administration threats to slash PEPFAR ’ s budget , Birx has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other sources of funding wherever she can find them.
” The National Institutes of Health ( NIH ) , of which NIAID is a part , have been joined at the hip with the Gates Foundation for many years , together funding 57 % of “ global-health research and development on diseases that disproportionately affect populations in low- and middle-income countries.
” The close partnership has involved working to develop new vaccines ( such as a malaria vaccine and a universal influenza vaccine ) as well as mobilizing Gates funding streams to roll @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In 2013 , Gates declared himself “ thrilled ” with NIH for “ pushing [ vaccine research ] forward ” and stated , “ We are just at the beginning of what we can do together.
” Despite writing on March 26 in The New England Journal of Medicine that the COVID-19 case fatality rate is likely to be no worse than the rate observed for a severe seasonal flu , Dr. Fauci continues to pledge allegiance to extreme measures , parroting Mr. Gates ’ statements that more prolonged lockdowns are necessary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of obsessive-compulsive hand-washers who never share a handshake again .
On these topics , Birx has been evasive and non-committal .
Recently , Dr. Zeke Emanuel—coronavirus advisor to both Joe Biden and the WHO , and one of the former ringleaders behind Obamacare—joined the fray , urging the banning of conferences , concerts , sporting events , religious services and restaurant meals for another 18 months , or “ until we have a vaccine that protects everyone.
” The Guardianobligingly echoed this vaccine-centric propaganda on April 8 when , reporting on a Chinese @ @ @ @ @ @ @ British rag stated that “ Lockdowns can ’ t end until Covid-19 vaccine found.
” Listening to these individuals ’ carefully crafted public briefings on COVID-19 exit strategies , one could easily get the impression that a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is , indeed , the only way out .
For a population amped up on hysteria and fear , it may be challenging to accept other solutions—including the historically documented benefits of natural herd immunity—but the studies on unsafe vaccines for SARS-CoV , RSV and dengue suggest that Americans would be wise to ask @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” and push back against the billionaires and scientists looking to limit choices , control populations and make a financial killing .
TLB Editors Note : This is World Mercury Project on steroids !
TLB highly recommends you click on the image below , visit this great website , and do whatever you can to help see this vital forum succeed … for the sake of our children !
!
!
Please take the time to Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. and the Children ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ help to support us in our efforts .

Written & contributed to TLB by: The Children’s Health Defense Team
Just as COVID-19 (reportedly caused by the new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2) has dominated the news cycle in 2020, so, too, the focus on an eventual coronavirus vaccine has crowded out needed attention to a wider range of prevention and treatment strategies. Self-appointed pandemic guru Bill Gates—through a complex tangle of direct and indirect funding mechanisms that includes being the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) second largest donor—is gleefully leading the contingent promoting planet-wide coronavirus vaccination, unashamedly asserting that a vaccine “is the only thing that will allow us to return to normal.” Gates has the effrontery to make such claims despite financial conflicts of interest blatant enough to be noticed even by the credulous, and a lengthy trail of vaccine-related destruction left in the wake of Gates-funded vaccine programs around the world.
Globally, roughly 70 COVID-19 vaccines are in various stages of development—a veritable gold rush that will be all the more lucrative since Gates has made sure that the vaccines will be indemnified against lawsuits. Gates funding, through the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), is helping to spur the accelerated development of some of the leading contenders, including two of the three experimental vaccines rushed into Phase I trials in humans without any preliminary testing in animal models. (A third experimental vaccine will soon proceed to Phase II trials in China.) The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) is running the trial of one of these vaccines (mRNA-1273), co-developed under CEPI sponsorship with Cambridge-based biotech firm Moderna. Meanwhile, Pennsylvania-based Inovio Pharmaceuticals is conducting a Phase I trial of INO-4800, a vaccine being developed with massive infusions of funding from both the Gates Foundation and CEPI.
… Kim warned that even when vaccine makers appropriately begin the process with animal studies, “vaccine development is characterized by a high failure rate of often 93%. … Kim warned that even when vaccine makers appropriately begin the process with animal studies, “vaccine development is characterized by a high failure rate of often 93%.
In early April, Dr. Jerome H. Kim (Director General of the United-Nations-affiliated International Vaccine Institute) called attention to the “unprecedented speed” with which the Phase I trials launched, stating that it will be difficult to know whether a vaccine developed in a scant four, 12 or even 18 months “is really safe” and noting that the vaccine development process ordinarily takes anywhere from five to ten years. Although striving for enthusiasm about the “remarkable” speed-up, Kim warned that even when vaccine makers appropriately begin the process with animal studies, “vaccine development is characterized by a high failure rate of ‘often 93%.’”
Dr. Kim’s words of warning are far from theoretical. In the mid-to-late 2000s, scientists engaged in an ultimately futile effort to develop a vaccine to address the first SARS-related coronavirus (SARS-CoV). Researchers of the day developed four SARS-CoV vaccines that underwent testing in animal models and two (described in 2007 and 2008) that proceeded to Phase I trials in humans. The less-than-reassuring results of the animal studies, in particular, prompted one set of researchers to conclude that “Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated” [emphasis added].
…all of the vaccinated mice, irrespective of the type of vaccine or the presence or absence of aluminum adjuvant, displayed unique lung damage not seen in the control mice … …all of the vaccinated mice, irrespective of the type of vaccine or the presence or absence of aluminum adjuvant, displayed unique lung damage not seen in the control mice …
Troubling results in animals
In 2012, Texas researchers with combined expertise in molecular virology, microbiology, immunology, biodefense and emerging diseases reported in the journal PLoS ONE on their evaluation—in mice—of four candidate vaccines designed to prevent SARS-CoV. All four vaccines had run into trouble in earlier experimental studies, which showed that the vaccines had a tendency to induce pathologic lung reactions in the unfortunate recipients—whether mice, ferrets or nonhuman primates.
The Texas scientists reevaluated the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of two whole-virus vaccines prepared in Vero tissue or Vero cell cultures (from African green monkey kidney); one recombinant (genetically engineered) DNA spike protein vaccine produced in insect cells; and their own virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine containing SARS-CoV proteins as well as mouse hepatitis coronavirus. They also compared versions of the vaccines containing an aluminum adjuvant with adjuvant-free formulations. The research team injected the experimental groups of mice with vaccine on days zero and 28, exposed them to live SARS-CoV on day 56 and sacrificed them two days later (day 58) to examine the lungs for virus and histopathology, comparing the experimental mice to control groups.
All four vaccines appeared to induce antibodies against SARS-CoV two days after exposure to live virus. However, the second set of results—the findings that persuaded the researchers to urge the utmost caution in proceeding to human testing—showed that all of the vaccinated mice, irrespective of the type of vaccine or the presence or absence of aluminum adjuvant, displayed unique lung damage not seen in the control mice, and the pathology occurred in the absence of any detectable SARS coronavirus in the lungs. The researchers described this “Th2-type immunopathology”—indicated in part by abnormal levels of white blood cells called eosinophils—as suggestive of vaccine-induced “hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components.”
… the RSV vaccine stimulated an unbalanced immune response that potentiated disease in the vaccine recipients upon subsequent exposure to RSV, often leading to hospitalization and sometimes leading to death. … the RSV vaccine stimulated an unbalanced immune response that potentiated disease in the vaccine recipients upon subsequent exposure to RSV, often leading to hospitalization and sometimes leading to death.
Troubling results in humans
To explain their findings, the Texas researchers pointed to studies showing similar immunopathologic reactions in human infants who, in the 1960s, received vaccines for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). That body of research found that the RSV vaccine “stimulated an unbalanced immune response” that “potentiated” disease in the vaccine recipients upon subsequent exposure to RSV, often leading to hospitalization and sometimes leading to death. Given that the very basis for developing a SARS vaccine was to protect vaccine recipients from infectious SARS-CoV, the Texas researchers concluded that a vaccine that instead elicited an immunopathologic reaction (as had occurred in the 1960s with the RSV vaccine) was cause for concern.
More recently, in 2016, scientists expressed similar worries when children in the Philippines developed serious complications or died after receiving a vaccine to protect against dengue disease. Far from protecting the children, the vaccine dramatically worsened risks of severe complications in children exposed to dengue after vaccination. The deaths of roughly 600 children are now under criminal investigation.
Two other worries highlighted by the Texas researchers in 2012 are worth mentioning in light of today’s COVID-19 context. First, given that there are a number of human coronaviruses, the researchers suggested that their results raised important questions about the “safety of vaccinated persons exposed to other coronaviruses.” Second, they noted that although the two Phase I clinical trials of SARS-CoV vaccines in humans had reported the vaccines to “induce antibody responses and to be ‘safe,’ . . . the evidence for safety [was] for a short period of observation.” Today, knowing that even the WHO’s top experts are questioning how vaccine safety gets evaluated, one wonders how the rushed COVID-19 vaccine trials will be able to address SARS-CoV safety concerns to any meaningful degree.
Gates declared himself thrilled with NIH for pushing [vaccine research] forward.
Cheech and Chong…and Gates
Bill Gates and his foundation have longstanding ties with the good-cop/bad-cop duo that has been headlining the official COVID-19 narrative: Dr. Anthony Fauci, long-time NIAID director, and physician and retired Army colonel Dr. Deborah Birx, U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator and Special Representative for Global Health Diplomacy. It is noteworthy that the two government doctors are long-time allies, having cut their professional teeth working “side by side” on the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s and sharing overlapping career paths ever since. With HIV vaccine patents to both their names, neither Birx nor Fauci is a stranger to the lure and potential profits involved in vaccine development—regardless of whether the vaccine ever pans out.
In the early 2000s, Birx was one of the lead investigators of an HIV vaccine clinical trial in Thailand. Although the trial’s methodology and results drew severe criticism, Birx and others—including Fauci—spun the study as a success. As her reward, Birx then spent the next ten years directing the CDC’s Division of Global HIV/AIDS. In 2016, Fauci and NIAID dished out more taxpayer money to test the same HIV vaccine all over again in South Africa, but NIAID had to call a halt to the study in February 2020, when an interim review found that the vaccine was worthless.
Around the same time as the Thai vaccine trial, Fauci was active as one of the “principal architects” of the 2003 President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), a still-ongoing program that has since ballooned into over 50 countries, where it coordinates (across seven different U.S. departments and agencies) promotion of HIV drugs and other measures. Since 2014, PEPFAR has been led by none other than Birx, who has been only too happy to accept generous Gates Foundation support. The foundation is the top source of philanthropic funding for all international HIV efforts, and development of an HIV vaccine remains one of its core “areas of focus.” In the face of recent Trump administration threats to slash PEPFAR’s budget, Birx has declared her willingness to seek out “other sources of funding wherever she can find them.”
The National Institutes of Health (NIH), of which NIAID is a part, have been joined at the hip with the Gates Foundation for many years, together funding 57% of “global-health research and development on diseases that disproportionately affect populations in low- and middle-income countries.” The close partnership has involved working to develop new vaccines (such as a malaria vaccine and a universal influenza vaccine) as well as mobilizing Gates funding streams to roll out NIH-developed vaccines across the developing world. In 2013, Gates declared himself “thrilled” with NIH for “pushing [vaccine research] forward” and stated, “We are just at the beginning of what we can do together.”
…the studies on unsafe vaccines for SARS-CoV, RSV and dengue suggest that Americans would be wise to ask the age-old question of ‘who benefits’ and push back against the billionaires and scientists looking to limit choices, control populations and make a financial killing. …the studies on unsafe vaccines for SARS-CoV, RSV and dengue suggest that Americans would be wise to ask the age-old question of ‘who benefits’ and push back against the billionaires and scientists looking to limit choices, control populations and make a financial killing.
Singing the same discordant tune
Despite writing on March 26 in The New England Journal of Medicine that the COVID-19 case fatality rate is likely to be no worse than the rate observed for a severe seasonal flu, Dr. Fauci continues to pledge allegiance to extreme measures, parroting Mr. Gates’ statements that more prolonged lockdowns are necessary and advising Americans to become a nation of obsessive-compulsive hand-washers who never share a handshake again. On these topics, Birx has been evasive and non-committal.
Recently, Dr. Zeke Emanuel—coronavirus advisor to both Joe Biden and the WHO, and one of the former ringleaders behind Obamacare—joined the fray, urging the banning of conferences, concerts, sporting events, religious services and restaurant meals for another 18 months, or “until we have a vaccine that protects everyone.”The Guardianobligingly echoed this vaccine-centric propaganda on April 8 when, reporting on a Chinese studyjust published in The Lancet, the British rag stated that “Lockdowns can’t end until Covid-19 vaccine found.”
Listening to these individuals’ carefully crafted public briefings on COVID-19 exit strategies, one could easily get the impression that a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is, indeed, the only way out. For a population amped up on hysteria and fear, it may be challenging to accept other solutions—including the historically documented benefits of natural herd immunity—but the studies on unsafe vaccines for SARS-CoV, RSV and dengue suggest that Americans would be wise to ask the age-old question of “who benefits” and push back against the billionaires and scientists looking to limit choices, control populations and make a financial killing.
••••
TLB Editors Note: This is World Mercury Project on steroids! TLB highly recommends you click on the image below, visit this great website, and do whatever you can to help see this vital forum succeed … for the sake of our children !!!
Please take the time to Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.
••••
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …


thelibertybeacon--2020-04-27--Protests nationwide scheduled for May 1 [Jon Rappoport report]

A growing number of groups in US states are preparing protests against the lockdowns on May 1 .
I ’ ve found two sites that are publishing information on the protests .
Check out your state and see what ’ s upcoming .
As far as I can tell , this is not a top-down single-leader movement .
It ’ s a state by state proposition .
That would be a good thing .
Groups in each state should run their own operations .
Here is a quote from American Revolution 2.0 : “ Governor Executive Orders violate the United @ @ @ @ @ @ @ individual citizens for their ‘ Life , Liberty , and Pursuit of Happiness ’ .
The precedent set by removing these Constitutional Rights is staggering and to date unheard of.
” Of course , agencies like the CDC and the World Health Organization appoint themselves the “ new global governance.
” Their job is painting as bleak a picture as possible , making it seem that , without their top-down control , the population of Earth would be decimated .
This is always the way of tyrants .
How else can they justify @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of enemies is a strategy as old as the hills .
Peace and prosperity are stakes through the hearts of vampires .
To accomplish this victory , they enlist the help of public and private meddlers and gossipers and snitches and censors , whose only thrill in life is finding “ rule-breakers.
” Therefore , the more rules the better .
The culture of society is becoming more infantile every day—wash your hands , wash them again , don ’ t touch your face , stay indoors , wear a mask , wear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wait in line , don ’ t breathe on your neighbor , be polite , watch TV for marching orders—but those people who still understand what freedom means are under no obligation to cater to that “ culture.
” Lowest common denominator is not a principle contained in the Constitution .
In fact , wherever the principle is found , it ’ s a cover for dictatorship .
For example , the ubiquitous “ we ’ re all in this together ” is a massage for the brainless .
Translation : “ You @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and we , the World Health Organization , with Bill Gates money , are pressing the two pieces of toast together and making the sandwich.
” State by state , the protests against unconstitutional insanity are scheduled for May 1 .
OPEN THE STATES .
GO BACK TO WORK .
TURN ON THE ECONOMY .
Coronavirus , Phase Two : arbitrarily expand the definition of the disease ( TLB ) published this original article from the blog of Jon Rappoport with our appreciation for his contribution to raise health and freedom awareness @ @ @ @ @ @ @ three explosive collections , THE MATRIX REVEALED , EXIT FROM THE MATRIX , and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX , Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California .
He maintains a consulting practice for private clients , the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power .
Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize , he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years , writing articles on politics , medicine , and health for CBS Healthwatch , LA Weekly , Spin Magazine , Stern @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the US and Europe .
Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics , health , logic , and creative power to audiences around the world .
You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Protests nationwide scheduled for May 1
JON RAPPOPORT
A growing number of groups in US states are preparing protests against the lockdowns on May 1.
I’ve found two sites that are publishing information on the protests.
Check out your state and see what’s upcoming.
As far as I can tell, this is not a top-down single-leader movement. It’s a state by state proposition. That would be a good thing. Groups in each state should run their own operations.
Here is a quote from American Revolution 2.0:
“Governor Executive Orders violate the United States Constitution and negate the responsibility of individual citizens for their ‘Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness’. The precedent set by removing these Constitutional Rights is staggering and to date unheard of.”
Of course, agencies like the CDC and the World Health Organization appoint themselves the “new global governance.” Their job is painting as bleak a picture as possible, making it seem that, without their top-down control, the population of Earth would be decimated.
This is always the way of tyrants. How else can they justify their criminal actions?
The endless invention of enemies is a strategy as old as the hills.
Peace and prosperity are stakes through the hearts of vampires.
For the CDC and WHO and Bill Gates, the idea that someone somewhere might be living free and healthy on his own accord…THAT to them is the virus which must be conquered.
To accomplish this victory, they enlist the help of public and private meddlers and gossipers and snitches and censors, whose only thrill in life is finding “rule-breakers.” Therefore, the more rules the better.
The culture of society is becoming more infantile every day—wash your hands, wash them again, don’t touch your face, stay indoors, wear a mask, wear gloves, stand six feet apart, wait in line, don’t breathe on your neighbor, be polite, watch TV for marching orders—but those people who still understand what freedom means are under no obligation to cater to that “culture.”
Lowest common denominator is not a principle contained in the Constitution. In fact, wherever the principle is found, it’s a cover for dictatorship. For example, the ubiquitous “we’re all in this together” is a massage for the brainless.
Translation: “You’re all one giant cheese glob, and we, the World Health Organization, with Bill Gates money, are pressing the two pieces of toast together and making the sandwich.”
State by state, the protests against unconstitutional insanity are scheduled for May 1.
OPEN THE STATES. GO BACK TO WORK. TURN ON THE ECONOMY.
_________
More from Jon Rappoport
*********
(TLB) published this original article from the blog of Jon Rappoport with our appreciation for his contribution to raise health and freedom awareness.
Jon Rappoport is the author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-04-27--Pelosi Changes Position On Trump Travel Ban [Video]

“ Shut The Door ” : Pelosi Changes Position On Trump Travel Ban Once Called Racist This weekend , CNN ’ s Jake Tapper did an excellent interview with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi where he drilled down on one of the most glaring contradictions in the Democratic narrative against President Donald Trump .
Pelosi and other Democrats excoriated Trump for his order to block travel from China on January 30th .
Pelosi was also in late February calling for people to mass in Chinatown in San Francisco to protest Trump ’ s comments and actions on China .
Now , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was that the travel ban did not go far enough ?
The Democrats have been struggling to negate the fact that Trump ’ s action in January counteracts the criticism that he did nothing , particularly when even that action was opposed by Democrats .
Interviews on Sunday were damaging in a number of ways for that effort .
In a different interview on Face the Nation , Mayor London Breed also tried to downplay the value of the travel ban by suggesting that she and other were already acting in December and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ then added that it is good that Chinatown “ basically was a ghost town ” in January.
” While she referenced the “ zenophobia ” cited by Pelosi , she appeared to say that it was fortunate that no one was gathering in Chinatown .
However in late February , Pelosi was encouraging people to mass in Chinatown .
Tapper ’ s interview pressed the point .
When the order was imposed , Pelosi was publicly and vehemently opposed to even the notion of a ban : ‘ ‘ The Trump Administration ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ travel ban threatens our security , our values and the rule of law.
” Now however the order was not racist , but too little too late : “ Tens of thousands of people were still allowed in from China .
It wasn ’ t as it is described as this great moment .
… If you ’ re going to shut the door because you have an evaluation of an epidemic , then shut the door ” Tapper is one of the few to press the contraction in the position of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mentioned Pelosi ’ s bizarre pivot on the question .
A s with “ conspiracy theories , ” it seems like contradictions are not viewed as a plausible point of coverage for Democrats .
That brings us back to Breed ’ s interview .
There is an obvious disconnect in saying that San Francisco was aware in December and taking emergency actions in January .
However , they did little to impose social distancing as evidenced by Pelosi ’ s call to rally in Chinatown .
Likewise , in Michigan , I covered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ others were continuing such events .
The fact is that , in January and February , there were highly conflicting reports coming the WHO , China , and even the CDC .
I do not blame officials like Breed in not ordering more significant measures even though she admits that they were alarmed in December and closely following the developments .
This proved far more contagious than anticipated and China cost the world critical weeks by suppressing information as the virus became to spread globally .
It is inevitable that both parties will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ role of the media is more important than ever in supplying balanced and fair coverage of this issue .
Instead , much of the coverage seems to be transparently one-sided and willfully blind to the full record .
If the issue is not just malfeasance but nonfeasance , the media should ( as Tapper did ) look at the record of both parties .
After all public health in our federalism system remains primarily a state and local issue ( a point recently rediscovered by many Democratic leaders and the media ) .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ off-the-hook .
States rely on groups like the CDC for its expertise and data .
However , as Breed admitted , the danger was already apparent to her and her colleagues in December .
The point is not to cast blame but to question the lack of balance in the coverage on how the Administration responded in February and March .
If the media is confused about why Trump ’ s core still support him , it likely has something to do with the overtly distorted and biased coverage on such issues .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ slamming President Trump when he has contradicted himself or the record .
My only complaint is how contractions from the other side are routinely ignored or buried in the coverage .
This long-standing pattern erodes trust in the media and denies citizens any reliable source for news .
Professor Jonathan Turley is a nationally recognized legal scholar who has written extensively in areas ranging from constitutional law to legal theory to tort law .
He has written over three dozen academic articles that have appeared in a variety of leading law journals at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Northwestern , University of Chicago , and other schools .
After a stint at Tulane Law School , Professor Turley joined the George Washington faculty in 1990 and , in 1998 , was given the prestigious Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law , the youngest chaired professor in the school ’ s history .
In addition to his extensive publications , Professor Turley has served as counsel in some of the most notable cases in the last two decades including the representation of whistleblowers , military personnel , judges , members of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other clients .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

“Shut The Door”: Pelosi Changes Position On Trump Travel Ban Once Called Racist
JONATHAN TURLEY
This weekend, CNN’s Jake Tapper did an excellent interview with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi where he drilled down on one of the most glaring contradictions in the Democratic narrative against President Donald Trump. Pelosi and other Democrats excoriated Trump for his order to block travel from China on January 30th. Pelosi was also in late February calling for people to mass in Chinatown in San Francisco to protest Trump’s comments and actions on China. Now, however, Pelosi is saying the problem was that the travel ban did not go far enough?
The Democrats have been struggling to negate the fact that Trump’s action in January counteracts the criticism that he did nothing, particularly when even that action was opposed by Democrats. Interviews on Sunday were damaging in a number of ways for that effort. In a different interview on Face the Nation, Mayor London Breed also tried to downplay the value of the travel ban by suggesting that she and other were already acting in December and declared an emergency in February. She then added that it is good that Chinatown “basically was a ghost town” in January.” While she referenced the “zenophobia” cited by Pelosi, she appeared to say that it was fortunate that no one was gathering in Chinatown. However in late February, Pelosi was encouraging people to mass in Chinatown.
Tapper’s interview pressed the point. When the order was imposed, Pelosi was publicly and vehemently opposed to even the notion of a ban: ‘‘The Trump Administration’s expansion of its outrageous, un-American travel ban threatens our security, our values and the rule of law.”
Now however the order was not racist, but too little too late: “Tens of thousands of people were still allowed in from China. It wasn’t as it is described as this great moment. … If you’re going to shut the door because you have an evaluation of an epidemic, then shut the door”
Speaker Pelosi on Trump’s China travel restriction: “Tens of thousands of people were still allowed in from China. It wasn’t as it is described as this great moment. … If you’re going to shut the door because you have an evaluation of an epidemic, then shut the door” #CNNSOTU pic.twitter.com/jpKFxYVCu6 — CNN Politics (@CNNPolitics) April 26, 2020
Tapper is one of the few to press the contraction in the position of the Democrats and notably few media outlets even mentioned Pelosi’s bizarre pivot on the question. A s with “conspiracy theories,” it seems like contradictions are not viewed as a plausible point of coverage for Democrats. . That brings us back to Breed’s interview. There is an obvious disconnect in saying that San Francisco was aware in December and taking emergency actions in January. However, they did little to impose social distancing as evidenced by Pelosi’s call to rally in Chinatown. Likewise, in Michigan, I covered the huge Sanders rally as Biden and others were continuing such events. . The fact is that, in January and February, there were highly conflicting reports coming the WHO, China, and even the CDC. I do not blame officials like Breed in not ordering more significant measures even though she admits that they were alarmed in December and closely following the developments. This proved far more contagious than anticipated and China cost the world critical weeks by suppressing information as the virus became to spread globally. It is inevitable that both parties will engage in the blame game but the role of the media is more important than ever in supplying balanced and fair coverage of this issue. Instead, much of the coverage seems to be transparently one-sided and willfully blind to the full record. If the issue is not just malfeasance but nonfeasance, the media should (as Tapper did) look at the record of both parties. After all public health in our federalism system remains primarily a state and local issue (a point recently rediscovered by many Democratic leaders and the media). That does not get the federal government off-the-hook. States rely on groups like the CDC for its expertise and data. However, as Breed admitted, the danger was already apparent to her and her colleagues in December. .
The point is not to cast blame but to question the lack of balance in the coverage on how the Administration responded in February and March. If the media is confused about why Trump’s core still support him, it likely has something to do with the overtly distorted and biased coverage on such issues. I have joined the mainstream media in slamming President Trump when he has contradicted himself or the record. My only complaint is how contractions from the other side are routinely ignored or buried in the coverage. This long-standing pattern erodes trust in the media and denies citizens any reliable source for news. _________
Chinatown video added by (TLB)
********* (TLB) published this article from J Bio Professor Jonathan Turley is a nationally recognized legal scholar who has written extensively in areas ranging from constitutional law to legal theory to tort law. He has written over three dozen academic articles that have appeared in a variety of leading law journals at Cornell, Duke, Georgetown, Harvard, Northwestern, University of Chicago, and other schools. After a stint at Tulane Law School, Professor Turley joined the George Washington faculty in 1990 and, in 1998, was given the prestigious Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law, the youngest chaired professor in the school’s history. In addition to his extensive publications, Professor Turley has served as counsel in some of the most notable cases in the last two decades including the representation of whistleblowers, military personnel, judges, members of Congress, and a wide range of other clients. Continue reading Bio… •••• •••• Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.