thelibertybeacon--2020-11-05--WW3 is not quite what we expected but we are in it nevertheless

I think much of the problem we are having with government boils down to the fact that we have not yet reached a strong agreement or clear vision as to what it is for and what it is supposed to do .
For instance , there appear to be two disparate basic principles of government in play .
One is that the people should serve the government .
This as far as I can make out is an ancient concept that goes back as far as the pharaohs and beyond .
It has been the prevailing concept for millennia .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ any lie or crime committed against the people is justified .
The other is that the government should serve the people .
This is relatively new .
It is currently at war with the above , older concept .
The first idea , is adhered to by most of our political elite , the globalists and their proxies in government .
It is part of the historical roots from which their current incarnations have evolved .
The second is a complete pain in the ass for those who still think the first is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the second concept has gained much support as an idea among the people , the elite have had to become less overt and more devious about their furtherance of the first idea .
Often they will further the first idea whilst pretending to further the second and we see this deceit in operation right now in the actions of our government and parliament .
Their PR and the outer veneer of democracy speak of the second concept , yet their ACTIONs attest to the prevalence in their thinking of the second .
Thus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ finding another foisted on them , become bewildered by the unresolved contradictions .
They find themselves ruled by diktat and edict and “ YOU MUSTs ” , lied to and deceived without conscience and all “ for their own good ” .
They discover that the parliament they thought was there to represent them manned by people who readily endorse the actions that subjugate them .
There is a war on and we are in it .
The present and future lives of the inhabitants of this planet depends on which concept prevails @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been until now a prison planet .
But the inmates have rustled up a prison break and the jailers and trustees are stepping in hurriedly to quell it .
Look at it another way : these two disparate philosophies are at war as the adherents of the first mobilise to try to eliminate the second now before it is too late – because if and when the second prevails , they ’ ve had it .
A victory for the second idea will usher in a Golden Age for Man , for we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for a great civilisation , instead of one that leaves our efforts to reach the stars hobbled , hamstrung and incapacitated .
Step back a moment and look it over : this IS World War Three .
It started when the enemy launched a surprise attack , COVID19 was our Pearl Harbour , so to speak .
But the thing about surprise attacks is that the surprise wears off , the initial stolen momentum runs out of steam , the intended target mobilises and fights back and the aggressor more often than not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it .
The sides and the battlefield are not quite what we expected but we have awoken to find ourselves fighting WW3 nevertheless .
And we , the people , have not even BEGUN to mobilise .
When we do , we ’ ll win .
The above article is from UK Reloaded The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

by Fabian Ubiquitus
I think much of the problem we are having with government boils down to the fact that we have not yet reached a strong agreement or clear vision as to what it is for and what it is supposed to do.
For instance, there appear to be two disparate basic principles of government in play.
One is that the people should serve the government. This as far as I can make out is an ancient concept that goes back as far as the pharaohs and beyond. It has been the prevailing concept for millennia. For those who adhere to it, any lie or crime committed against the people is justified.
The other is that the government should serve the people. This is relatively new. It is currently at war with the above, older concept.
The first idea, is adhered to by most of our political elite, the globalists and their proxies in government. It is part of the historical roots from which their current incarnations have evolved.
The second is a complete pain in the ass for those who still think the first is the way to go.
But as the second concept has gained much support as an idea among the people, the elite have had to become less overt and more devious about their furtherance of the first idea. Often they will further the first idea whilst pretending to further the second and we see this deceit in operation right now in the actions of our government and parliament. Their PR and the outer veneer of democracy speak of the second concept, yet their ACTIONs attest to the prevalence in their thinking of the second. Thus the People, expecting one thing but finding another foisted on them, become bewildered by the unresolved contradictions.
They find themselves ruled by diktat and edict and “YOU MUSTs”, lied to and deceived without conscience and all “for their own good”. They discover that the parliament they thought was there to represent them manned by people who readily endorse the actions that subjugate them.
There is a war on and we are in it. The present and future lives of the inhabitants of this planet depends on which concept prevails.
One could say that this has been until now a prison planet. But the inmates have rustled up a prison break and the jailers and trustees are stepping in hurriedly to quell it.
Look at it another way: these two disparate philosophies are at war as the adherents of the first mobilise to try to eliminate the second now before it is too late – because if and when the second prevails, they’ve had it.
A victory for the second idea will usher in a Golden Age for Man, for we now need to create a government fit for a great civilisation, instead of one that leaves our efforts to reach the stars hobbled, hamstrung and incapacitated.
Step back a moment and look it over: this IS World War Three.
It started when the enemy launched a surprise attack, COVID19 was our Pearl Harbour, so to speak.
But the thing about surprise attacks is that the surprise wears off, the initial stolen momentum runs out of steam, the intended target mobilises and fights back and the aggressor more often than not winds up wishing he had never started it.
The sides and the battlefield are not quite what we expected but we have awoken to find ourselves fighting WW3 nevertheless.
And we, the people, have not even BEGUN to mobilise.
When we do, we’ll win.
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-04--Trump: ‘Surprise Ballot Dumps’ Behind Lead Changes [PROOF/Video]

President Trump took to Twitter on Wednesday claiming that ‘ surprise ballot dumps ’ are to blame for his lead ‘ magically disappearing ’ overnight .
“ Last night I was leading , often solidly , in many key States , in almost all instances Democrat run & controlled , ” wrote Trump , adding : “ Then , one by one , they started to magically disappear as surprise ballot dumps were counted.
” Trump ’ s comments come after several key states mysteriously stopped counting ballots on election night for the first time in perhaps ever , after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all , or mostly all for Biden – tipped the race towards the former Vice President in Michigan and Wisconsin .
There were more votes counted in Wisconsin than the number of people registered to vote : BREAKING : Wisconsin has more votes than people who are registered to vote .
Total number of registered voters : 3,129,000 Total number of votes cast : 3,239,920 This is direct evidence of fraud .
Sean Davis of The Federalist pointed out the ‘ magical ballots ’ issue , and was promptly censored for it .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ edification … And one about the Media for good measure… Continue reading this article from ZeroHedge as compiled by Tyler Durden and staff .
There ’ s A Solution To Big Tech Censorship … But No Politician Will Touch It The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .
Disclaimer : The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including , but not limited to , text , graphics , images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction .
Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice , diagnosis or @ @

Trump: ‘Surprise Ballot Dumps’ Behind Lead Changes
ZH | (TLB)
President Trump took to Twitter on Wednesday claiming that ‘surprise ballot dumps’ are to blame for his lead ‘magically disappearing’ overnight.
“Last night I was leading, often solidly, in many key States, in almost all instances Democrat run & controlled,” wrote Trump, adding: “Then, one by one, they started to magically disappear as surprise ballot dumps were counted.”
Last night I was leading, often solidly, in many key States, in almost all instances Democrat run & controlled. Then, one by one, they started to magically disappear as surprise ballot dumps were counted. VERY STRANGE, and the “pollsters” got it completely & historically wrong! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 4, 2020
How come every time they count Mail-In ballot dumps they are so devastating in their percentage and power of destruction? — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 4, 2020
***
Trump’s comments come after several key states mysteriously stopped counting ballots on election night for the first time in perhaps ever, after which large batches of votes – seemingly all, or mostly all for Biden – tipped the race towards the former Vice President in Michigan and Wisconsin.
***
(TLB) Editor: At this point we are going to insert damming evidence, as in cutting to the chase, and then provide you a link to read the rest of the story.
***
There were more votes counted in Wisconsin than the number of people registered to vote:
Mike Coudrey @MichaelCoudrey
BREAKING: Wisconsin has more votes than people who are registered to vote. Total number of registered voters: 3,129,000 Total number of votes cast: 3,239,920 This is direct evidence of fraud.
Sean Davis of The Federalist pointed out the ‘magical ballots’ issue, and was promptly censored for it.
***
We will add this video for your edification …
***
And one about the Media for good measure…
Tucker Carlson calling out the entire news industry during Fox News’ 2020 election coverage is a bold move. But somebody had to do it. pic.twitter.com/2XbZegFawl — Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) November 4, 2020
***
Related from The Liberty Beacon:
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-04--There’s A Solution To Big Tech Censorship … But No Politician Will Touch It

There Is A Solution To Big Tech Censorship – But No Politician Will Touch It Big tech social media conglomerates argue that their websites are like any other private business and that they are protected from overt government interference by the US constitution .
In other words , they have a right to platform or deplatform anyone they choose .
Of course , this is the exact OPPOSITE of what most leftist groups have argued in the past when it comes to private businesses refusing to cooperate with people they disagree with on basic principle , such as LGBT activists @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hypocrisy aside for now .
Social media companies have decided that the people they want to deplatform most are conservatives , along anyone else who disagrees with hard left ideologies such as social justice or the handling of the pandemic situation .
Statements or content that run contrary to leftist philosophies are simply labeled “ hate speech ” or “ conspiracy theory ” and are erased .
Conservatives argue that big tech is a monopoly with far too much power , that social media should be treated more like a public resource or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ companies are violating the free speech rights of conservatives by specifically targeting them for censorship .
Many conservatives are also demanding that Donald Trump and the government step in to regulate or punish such companies for these actions .
The truth is that both sides are right , and both sides are wrong .
The real solution to the problem requires a radical change in how we view the institution of corporations and how they interact with government , and it ’ s a solution I doubt ANY political official will consider , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and big tech do in fact represent a monopoly , but not in terms most people are familiar with .
Instead of acting only as an economic monopoly controlling market share , big tech is also a political monopoly controlling the majority of communication platforms .
If only one political and social ideological group dominates every major social media and digital information outlet , this in my view represents a completely unbalanced power dynamic that does indeed threaten the free speech rights of the populace .
Rabid censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by facts and evidence that big tech has chosen to bury because it ’ s inconvenient to them rather than a violation of their community guidelines , is just one more example of the incredible danger that social media monopolies present .
Obviously , there is the issue of private property rights to consider .
I fully support and defend private property rights and I do believe that a business has the freedom to refuse service to anyone for any reason .
Just because you open your doors to the public does not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
You should have the right to refuse labor whenever you wish .
If a business refuses a customer based merely on personal bias , then word is going to get around quickly and that business may lose a large number of potential buyers in the future ( this is happening right now with multiple alternative social media companies on the rise ) .
The free market should determine the fate of that business , not state or federal governments .
Government itself is an untrustworthy entity that craves a monopoly of power @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to micromanage the policies and internal practices of web companies we might be trading the big tech monster for an even more dangerous governmental monster .
Who is to say that the government will stop with sites like Facebook or Twitter or Google ?
Maybe they will exploit their newfound powers to go after smaller websites as well .
Maybe they will attempt to micromanage the entire internet .
Maybe they will start dominating and restricting conservative websites instead of the leftist conglomerates we intended , and then we will be doubly screwed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bill of Rights , then this debate leaves us at an impasse .
Both sides ( perhaps conveniently ) lead to a totalitarian outcome .
The thing is , the publicly presented argument is a contrived one , a manipulated discussion that only presents two sides when there are more options to consider .
The narrative is fixed , it is a farce .
The public has been led to believe that government and corporations are separate tools that can be used to keep each side in check .
This is a lie @ @ @ @ @ @ @ always worked together while pretending to be disconnected , and this needs to stop if we are to ever defuse the political time bomb we now face .
To solve the social media censorship debacle we need to examine the very roots of corporations as entities .
First , corporations as we know them today are a relatively new phenomenon .
Adam Smith described the concept of a corporation as a “ joint stock company ” in his treatise ‘ The Wealth Of Nations ’ , and stood against them as a threat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outlined their history of monopoly and failure , and criticized their habit of avoiding responsibility for mistakes and crimes .
Joint stock companies were chartered by governments and given special protections from risk , as well as protection from civil litigation ( lawsuits ) .
But , they were supposed to be temporary business entities , not perpetual business entities .
The point was to allow for the creation of a joint stock company to finish a particular job , such as building a railroad , and once the job was finished the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were no longer needed .
Smith knew that if corporations were ever allowed to become permanent fixtures in an economy , they would result in disaster .
This is exactly what happened in 1886 when the Supreme Court allowed companies like Southern Pacific Railroad to use the 14th Amendment , which was supposed to protect the constitutional rights of newly freed slaves , as a loophole to declare corporations as “ legal persons ” with all the protections of an individual citizen .
Not only that , but with limited liability , corporations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ normal individuals .
Corporations became the preeminent force in the world and it was their relationship with governments that made this possible .
This fact completely debunks today ’ s notion of what constitutes free markets .
Corporations ARE NOT free market structures .
They are , in fact , government chartered and government protected monopolies .
They are SOCIALIST creations , not free market creations , and therefore they should not exist in a free market society at all .
The alternative option to corporations was for businesses to form “ partnerships @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from government , limited liability or the ability to form monopolies .
When the owners of a partnership committed a crime , they could be personally held liable for that crime .
When a corporation commits a crime , only the company as a vaporous faceless entity can be punished .
This is why it is very rare to see company CEOs face prosecution no matter how egregious and catastrophic their actions .
Today , certain corporations continue to enjoy government protections while also enjoying government welfare .
Meaning , these companies get @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the advantage of tax incentives and taxpayer dollars .
For example , Google ( Alphabet and YouTube ) has long received huge tax breaks and is rarely if ever forced to pay in full for the massive bandwidth the company uses .
In fact , YouTube was facing bandwidth affordability issues until it was purchased by Alphabet and Google , then it no longer had to worry about it – Google gets over 21 times more bandwidth than it actually pays for because of government intervention .
The same rules apply to companies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Apple , etc .
All of them enjoy extensive tax breaks as well as cheap bandwidth that makes it impossible for small and medium sized businesses to compete , even if they operate on a superior model or have superior ideas .
Many times the corporations pay no taxes whatsoever while smaller businesses are crippled by overt payments .
A true free market requires competition as a rule , but the current system deliberately crushes competition .
Again , we live in a socialist framework , not a free market framework .
Now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tech and what these companies actually are ( creations of government ) , the debate on social media censorship changes .
How ?
Take for example the fact that public universities in the US are not legally allowed to interfere with free speech rights because many of them survive by consuming taxpayer dollars .
They are PUBLIC institutions , not private .
Why then are we treating major corporations that survive on endless taxpayer infusions and incentives as if they are private businesses ?
They are not – They are publicly funded structures @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should be subject to the same rules on free speech that universities are required to follow .
Said corporations will surely argue against this and will attempt to use legal chicanery to maintain their monopolies .
Trying to dismantle them could take decades , and there are no guarantees that government officials will even make the attempt ?
Why would they ?
The relationship between government and corporations has been an advantageous one for establishment elites for decades .
Instead of challenging the corporate model in the Supreme Court , an easier option @ @ @ @ @ @ @ welfare and tax incentives for any big tech companies that refuse to allow free speech on their platforms .
If Google had to pay normal price for the bandwidth it uses , the corporation would either implode or it would be forced to break apart into multiple smaller companies that would then compete with each other .
More competition means lower prices for consumers along with better products .
The threat of losing tax incentives would mean more large companies would refrain from censorship .
Donald Trump as president could conceivably make this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and neither will any other political official .
The partnership between government and corporations will continue , I believe , because there are other agendas at play here .
The establishment WANTS the public to argue in favor of tech totalitarianism on one side and in favor of government totalitarianism on the other side .
They aren ’ t going to allow any other solutions to enter the discussion .
The only available strategy left for fighting back against big tech is to continue leaving their platforms and building our own .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The point is , there is a more permanent option , but it requires a complete deconstruction of the socialist government/corporate framework now in place .
To confront the power dynamic between governments and major conglomerates is to confront one of the fundamental sources of corruption within our society , which is why it won ’ t be allowed .
And when the system refuses to police itself , public upheaval becomes inevitable .

There Is A Solution To Big Tech Censorship – But No Politician Will Touch It
By: Brandon Smith
The issue of censorship by major tech companies is a precarious one, and I’m becoming increasingly suspicious of the nature of the debate. There are some complexities, but it can all be boiled down to this:
Big tech social media conglomerates argue that their websites are like any other private business and that they are protected from overt government interference by the US constitution. In other words, they have a right to platform or deplatform anyone they choose. Of course, this is the exact OPPOSITE of what most leftist groups have argued in the past when it comes to private businesses refusing to cooperate with people they disagree with on basic principle, such as LGBT activists, but let’s set that hypocrisy aside for now.
Social media companies have decided that the people they want to deplatform most are conservatives, along anyone else who disagrees with hard left ideologies such as social justice or the handling of the pandemic situation. Statements or content that run contrary to leftist philosophies are simply labeled “hate speech” or “conspiracy theory” and are erased.
Conservatives argue that big tech is a monopoly with far too much power, that social media should be treated more like a public resource or “town square” and that these companies are violating the free speech rights of conservatives by specifically targeting them for censorship. Many conservatives are also demanding that Donald Trump and the government step in to regulate or punish such companies for these actions.
The truth is that both sides are right, and both sides are wrong. The real solution to the problem requires a radical change in how we view the institution of corporations and how they interact with government, and it’s a solution I doubt ANY political official will consider, and that includes Trump.
Let me explain…
Social media and big tech do in fact represent a monopoly, but not in terms most people are familiar with. Instead of acting only as an economic monopoly controlling market share, big tech is also a political monopoly controlling the majority of communication platforms. If only one political and social ideological group dominates every major social media and digital information outlet, this in my view represents a completely unbalanced power dynamic that does indeed threaten the free speech rights of the populace.
Rabid censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal, a scandal that is supported by facts and evidence that big tech has chosen to bury because it’s inconvenient to them rather than a violation of their community guidelines, is just one more example of the incredible danger that social media monopolies present.
Obviously, there is the issue of private property rights to consider. I fully support and defend private property rights and I do believe that a business has the freedom to refuse service to anyone for any reason. Just because you open your doors to the public does not mean the public now owns your labor. You should have the right to refuse labor whenever you wish.
If a business refuses a customer based merely on personal bias, then word is going to get around quickly and that business may lose a large number of potential buyers in the future (this is happening right now with multiple alternative social media companies on the rise). The free market should determine the fate of that business, not state or federal governments.
Government itself is an untrustworthy entity that craves a monopoly of power, and by handing government the authority to micromanage the policies and internal practices of web companies we might be trading the big tech monster for an even more dangerous governmental monster.
Who is to say that the government will stop with sites like Facebook or Twitter or Google? Maybe they will exploit their newfound powers to go after smaller websites as well. Maybe they will attempt to micromanage the entire internet. Maybe they will start dominating and restricting conservative websites instead of the leftist conglomerates we intended, and then we will be doubly screwed.
If you value freedom and the Bill of Rights, then this debate leaves us at an impasse. Both sides (perhaps conveniently) lead to a totalitarian outcome. The thing is, the publicly presented argument is a contrived one, a manipulated discussion that only presents two sides when there are more options to consider. The narrative is fixed, it is a farce.
The public has been led to believe that government and corporations are separate tools that can be used to keep each side in check. This is a lie. Big government and big corporations have always worked together while pretending to be disconnected, and this needs to stop if we are to ever defuse the political time bomb we now face.
To solve the social media censorship debacle we need to examine the very roots of corporations as entities. First, corporations as we know them today are a relatively new phenomenon. Adam Smith described the concept of a corporation as a “joint stock company” in his treatise ‘The Wealth Of Nations’, and stood against them as a threat to free market economics. He specifically outlined their history of monopoly and failure, and criticized their habit of avoiding responsibility for mistakes and crimes.
Joint stock companies were chartered by governments and given special protections from risk, as well as protection from civil litigation (lawsuits). But, they were supposed to be temporary business entities, not perpetual business entities. The point was to allow for the creation of a joint stock company to finish a particular job, such as building a railroad, and once the job was finished the company was dissolved and the government protections were no longer needed. Smith knew that if corporations were ever allowed to become permanent fixtures in an economy, they would result in disaster.
This is exactly what happened in 1886 when the Supreme Court allowed companies like Southern Pacific Railroad to use the 14th Amendment, which was supposed to protect the constitutional rights of newly freed slaves, as a loophole to declare corporations as “legal persons” with all the protections of an individual citizen. Not only that, but with limited liability, corporations actually became super-citizens with protections far beyond normal individuals. Corporations became the preeminent force in the world and it was their relationship with governments that made this possible.
This fact completely debunks today’s notion of what constitutes free markets. Corporations ARE NOT free market structures. They are, in fact, government chartered and government protected monopolies. They are SOCIALIST creations, not free market creations, and therefore they should not exist in a free market society at all.
The alternative option to corporations was for businesses to form “partnerships”, which did not enjoy protection from government, limited liability or the ability to form monopolies. When the owners of a partnership committed a crime, they could be personally held liable for that crime. When a corporation commits a crime, only the company as a vaporous faceless entity can be punished. This is why it is very rare to see company CEOs face prosecution no matter how egregious and catastrophic their actions.
Today, certain corporations continue to enjoy government protections while also enjoying government welfare. Meaning, these companies get a legal shield while also basking in the advantage of tax incentives and taxpayer dollars.
For example, Google (Alphabet and YouTube) has long received huge tax breaks and is rarely if ever forced to pay in full for the massive bandwidth the company uses. In fact, YouTube was facing bandwidth affordability issues until it was purchased by Alphabet and Google, then it no longer had to worry about it – Google gets over 21 times more bandwidth than it actually pays for because of government intervention.
The same rules apply to companies like Twitter, Facebook, Netflix, Apple, etc. All of them enjoy extensive tax breaks as well as cheap bandwidth that makes it impossible for small and medium sized businesses to compete, even if they operate on a superior model or have superior ideas. Many times the corporations pay no taxes whatsoever while smaller businesses are crippled by overt payments.
A true free market requires competition as a rule, but the current system deliberately crushes competition. Again, we live in a socialist framework, not a free market framework.
Now that we understand the nature of big tech and what these companies actually are (creations of government), the debate on social media censorship changes.
How? Take for example the fact that public universities in the US are not legally allowed to interfere with free speech rights because many of them survive by consuming taxpayer dollars. They are PUBLIC institutions, not private. Why then are we treating major corporations that survive on endless taxpayer infusions and incentives as if they are private businesses? They are not – They are publicly funded structures chartered by the government and therefore they should be subject to the same rules on free speech that universities are required to follow.
Said corporations will surely argue against this and will attempt to use legal chicanery to maintain their monopolies. Trying to dismantle them could take decades, and there are no guarantees that government officials will even make the attempt? Why would they? The relationship between government and corporations has been an advantageous one for establishment elites for decades.
Instead of challenging the corporate model in the Supreme Court, an easier option would be to simply take away all welfare and tax incentives for any big tech companies that refuse to allow free speech on their platforms. If Google had to pay normal price for the bandwidth it uses, the corporation would either implode or it would be forced to break apart into multiple smaller companies that would then compete with each other. More competition means lower prices for consumers along with better products. The threat of losing tax incentives would mean more large companies would refrain from censorship.
Donald Trump as president could conceivably make this happen, but he will not, and neither will any other political official. The partnership between government and corporations will continue, I believe, because there are other agendas at play here. The establishment WANTS the public to argue in favor of tech totalitarianism on one side and in favor of government totalitarianism on the other side. They aren’t going to allow any other solutions to enter the discussion.
The only available strategy left for fighting back against big tech is to continue leaving their platforms and building our own. This will take many years to accomplish. The point is, there is a more permanent option, but it requires a complete deconstruction of the socialist government/corporate framework now in place. To confront the power dynamic between governments and major conglomerates is to confront one of the fundamental sources of corruption within our society, which is why it won’t be allowed. And when the system refuses to police itself, public upheaval becomes inevitable.
••••
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-04--Twitter Double Downs On Speech Control – Trump Tweets

Twitter Double Downs On Censorship With Renewed Warnings On Trump Tweets We have been discussing the rising private censorship on the Internet demanded by Democratic leaders and meted out by companies like Twitter and Facebook .
The original purpose of the Internet as a free and robust space for political and social expression is under attack as politicians demand greater levels of control to combat “ disinformation.
” Indeed , Biden adviser Pete Buttigieg on Election Day demanded more penalties for companies not stopping “ inciting material , ” a subjective term left intentionally undefined .
This drumbeat for censorship @ @ @ @ @ @ @ again hit tweets from President Donald Trump with warnings of disinformation .
The tweets were pure political speech and Twitter again showed that it is now fully committed to biased regulation of speech between users of its service .
I have criticized President Trump ’ s rhetoric in the election about “ stealing ” the election .
However , that is hyperbolic political speech .
Biden supporters , including leaders like House Whip James Clyburn , have been saying that Trump was stealing the election through voter suppression .
They have not been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump was immediately hit when he sent a post that Democrats were trying to “ steal ” the election : “ We are up BIG , but they are trying to STEAL the Election .
We will never let them do it .
Votes can not be cast after the Polls are closed !
” I have previously objected to such regulation of speech .
What is most disturbing is how liberals have embraced censorship and even declared that “ China was right ” on Internet controls .
Many Democrats have fallen back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Amendment does not regulate private companies so this is not an attack on free speech .
Free speech is a human right that is not solely based or exclusively defined by the First Amendment .
Censorship by Internet companies is a “ Little Brother ” threat long discussed by free speech advocates .
Some may willingly embrace corporate speech controls but it is still a denial of free speech .
This is why I recently described myself as an Internet Originalist : The alternative is “ internet originalism ” — no censorship .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ original roles , there would be no slippery slope of political bias or opportunism ; they would assume the same status as telephone companies .
We do not need companies to protect us from harmful or “ misleading ” thoughts .
The solution to bad speech is more speech , not approved speech .
If Pelosi demanded that Verizon or Sprint interrupt calls to stop people saying false or misleading things , the public would be outraged .
Twitter serves the same communicative function between consenting parties ; it simply allows thousands of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Those people do not sign up to exchange thoughts only to have Dorsey or some other internet overlord monitor their conversations and “ protect ” them from errant or harmful thoughts .
The actions by Twitter and Facebook on Election Day were reprehensible and wrong .
What is so disturbing is that so many Democrats have become enablers of such corporate speech controls by the giant tech companies .
Professor Jonathan Turley is a nationally recognized legal scholar who has written extensively in areas ranging from constitutional law to legal theory to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ three dozen academic articles that have appeared in a variety of leading law journals at Cornell , Duke , Georgetown , Harvard , Northwestern , University of Chicago , and other schools .
After a stint at Tulane Law School , Professor Turley joined the George Washington faculty in 1990 and , in 1998 , was given the prestigious Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law , the youngest chaired professor in the school ’ s history .
In addition to his extensive publications , Professor Turley has served as counsel in some of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two decades including the representation of whistleblowers , military personnel , judges , members of Congress , and a wide range of other clients .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior @ @ @ @ @ @ @ educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Twitter Double Downs On Censorship With Renewed Warnings On Trump Tweets
Jonathan Turley
We have been discussing the rising private censorship on the Internet demanded by Democratic leaders and meted out by companies like Twitter and Facebook.
The original purpose of the Internet as a free and robust space for political and social expression is under attack as politicians demand greater levels of control to combat “disinformation.”
Indeed, Biden adviser Pete Buttigieg on Election Day demanded more penalties for companies not stopping “inciting material,” a subjective term left intentionally undefined. This drumbeat for censorship was amplified on Election Day when Twitter again hit tweets from President Donald Trump with warnings of disinformation. The tweets were pure political speech and Twitter again showed that it is now fully committed to biased regulation of speech between users of its service.
I have criticized President Trump’s rhetoric in the election about “stealing” the election. However, that is hyperbolic political speech. Biden supporters, including leaders like House Whip James Clyburn, have been saying that Trump was stealing the election through voter suppression. They have not been hit with Twitter warnings. Yet, Trump was immediately hit when he sent a post that Democrats were trying to “steal” the election: “We are up BIG, but they are trying to STEAL the Election. We will never let them do it. Votes cannot be cast after the Polls are closed!”
I have previously objected to such regulation of speech. What is most disturbing is how liberals have embraced censorship and even declared that “China was right” on Internet controls. Many Democrats have fallen back on the false narrative that the First Amendment does not regulate private companies so this is not an attack on free speech. Free speech is a human right that is not solely based or exclusively defined by the First Amendment. Censorship by Internet companies is a “Little Brother” threat long discussed by free speech advocates. Some may willingly embrace corporate speech controls but it is still a denial of free speech.
This is why I recently described myself as an Internet Originalist:
The alternative is “internet originalism” — no censorship. If social media companies returned to their original roles, there would be no slippery slope of political bias or opportunism; they would assume the same status as telephone companies. We do not need companies to protect us from harmful or “misleading” thoughts. The solution to bad speech is more speech, not approved speech. If Pelosi demanded that Verizon or Sprint interrupt calls to stop people saying false or misleading things, the public would be outraged. Twitter serves the same communicative function between consenting parties; it simply allows thousands of people to participate in such digital exchanges. Those people do not sign up to exchange thoughts only to have Dorsey or some other internet overlord monitor their conversations and “protect” them from errant or harmful thoughts.
The actions by Twitter and Facebook on Election Day were reprehensible and wrong. What is so disturbing is that so many Democrats have become enablers of such corporate speech controls by the giant tech companies.
*********
(TLB) published this article from J
Bio
Professor Jonathan Turley is a nationally recognized legal scholar who has written extensively in areas ranging from constitutional law to legal theory to tort law. He has written over three dozen academic articles that have appeared in a variety of leading law journals at Cornell, Duke, Georgetown, Harvard, Northwestern, University of Chicago, and other schools.
After a stint at Tulane Law School, Professor Turley joined the George Washington faculty in 1990 and, in 1998, was given the prestigious Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law, the youngest chaired professor in the school’s history. In addition to his extensive publications, Professor Turley has served as counsel in some of the most notable cases in the last two decades including the representation of whistleblowers, military personnel, judges, members of Congress, and a wide range of other clients.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-05--KEN’S CORNER: The Reality Of Our American Nightmare

I woke up tossing and turning .
My mind is blown .
I just can ’ t conceive of America without Donald Trump .
He is the very best President I have seen in my life , and was an answer to a prayer .
I woke up 11 years ago late one night too , listening to a man stumbling through an amazing speech… his name was Ron Paul .
At the time I was publishing my writings about my travels in local newspapers , and when I saw the truth he was telling , and for thirty years @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I listened to every one of his speeches , and it changed me .
I started studying , and my relationship with the newspapers changed .
Mr Moody , the owner , commented on every one of my essays , a very conservative and responsible man , but when he retired , a left swing took place .
Trump has to win .
Without him at the helm , this balance of power will insure little or nothing will get done .
The deep state oligarchy will still own me , my , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It isn ’ t all bad , I ’ m heavily invested in the oil patch , especially LNG , which is poised to kick ass again , after this fake Pandemic .
But I will remain a slave .
Yesterday I saw a rare sight , an airliner circling for a landing , and I know that the powers who own us would rather burn us to the ground than relinquish control .
I hate them with every fiber of my being .
I see now there is no way to win @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , just like my mentor , Thomas Jefferson , told me in his letters .
If President Trump loses , We the people , will have lost our last chance at Liberty from tyranny .
It ’ s going to be hard to stand down .
I was prepared to give my life for the cause .
I just can ’ t believe how redistricting , and outright cheating kept the shadow government alive and in power .
It ’ s a hard thing to swallow , when I see such evil in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ precious , so trusting , so fragile , so easy to dominate , as we stare at each other behind a black mask… .
I want my country back .
I want my Constitutional Republic and civil liberties returned to me and truth restored as our most valuable possession , because without it we can never find common ground… our future will not belong to us .
Was it close ?
Was liberty within grasp ?
I don ’ t think so .
It was one slap on the face after another , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Zionist Bolshevik Communists have won again , and they are telling me , while spitting in my face , that I am obsolete .
From the Author , Ken La Rive – We in the Liberty movement have been fighting to take back this country for less than a decade , peacefully and with the love of God and country in our hearts .
Our banner has been trampled on and displaced by a multitude of distractions , further eroding our nation and the cause for Liberty .
And so , as we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fathom , powerful entities with unlimited resources stolen from our future , unaccountable trillions printed out of thin air and put on our backs as debt , we must formulate the most pitiful of all questions any patriot might ask in the final hour : Are we going to fight for our master ’ s tyranny , or are we going to demand the return of our civil liberties and Constitution ?
Are we going to choose The Banner of Liberty , or the shackles of voluntary servitude ?
Will it be a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ war to regain our ability to self govern , as the blood and toil of our forefathers presented to us , their children , as a gift ?
I fear that decision is emanate .
I fear that any decision will be a hard one , but my greatest fear of all is that the decision has already been made for us .

I woke up tossing and turning. My mind is blown. I just can’t conceive of America without Donald Trump. He is the very best President I have seen in my life, and was an answer to a prayer. I woke up 11 years ago late one night too, listening to a man stumbling through an amazing speech… his name was Ron Paul.
At the time I was publishing my writings about my travels in local newspapers, and when I saw the truth he was telling, and for thirty years, I started writing about it. I listened to every one of his speeches, and it changed me. I started studying, and my relationship with the newspapers changed. Mr Moody, the owner, commented on every one of my essays, a very conservative and responsible man, but when he retired, a left swing took place.
Trump has to win. Without him at the helm, this balance of power will insure little or nothing will get done. The deep state oligarchy will still own me, my, and my children’s future. It isn’t all bad, I’m heavily invested in the oil patch, especially LNG, which is poised to kick ass again, after this fake Pandemic. But I will remain a slave.
Yesterday I saw a rare sight, an airliner circling for a landing, and I know that the powers who own us would rather burn us to the ground than relinquish control. I hate them with every fiber of my being. I see now there is no way to win without the blood of tyrants and patriots, just like my mentor, Thomas Jefferson, told me in his letters.
If President Trump loses, We the people, will have lost our last chance at Liberty from tyranny. It’s going to be hard to stand down. I was prepared to give my life for the cause. I just can’t believe how redistricting, and outright cheating kept the shadow government alive and in power.
It’s a hard thing to swallow, when I see such evil in control of the American dream, so precious, so trusting, so fragile, so easy to dominate, as we stare at each other behind a black mask…. I want my country back. I want my Constitutional Republic and civil liberties returned to me and truth restored as our most valuable possession, because without it we can never find common ground… our future will not belong to us.
Was it close? Was liberty within grasp? I don’t think so. It was one slap on the face after another, and they are winning… Marxist Progressive Neocon Zionist Bolshevik Communists have won again, and they are telling me, while spitting in my face, that I am obsolete.
Parting Shot …
••••
Read more great articles from KEN’S CORNER
••••
From the Author, Ken La Rive – We in the Liberty movement have been fighting to take back this country for less than a decade, peacefully and with the love of God and country in our hearts. Our banner has been trampled on and displaced by a multitude of distractions, further eroding our nation and the cause for Liberty. And so, as we are pulled by forces we cannot fathom, powerful entities with unlimited resources stolen from our future, unaccountable trillions printed out of thin air and put on our backs as debt, we must formulate the most pitiful of all questions any patriot might ask in the final hour: Are we going to fight for our master’s tyranny, or are we going to demand the return of our civil liberties and Constitution? Are we going to choose The Banner of Liberty, or the shackles of voluntary servitude? Will it be a war for corporate profit, or a war to regain our ability to self govern, as the blood and toil of our forefathers presented to us, their children, as a gift? I fear that decision is emanate. I fear that any decision will be a hard one, but my greatest fear of all is that the decision has already been made for us.
••••
••••


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-05--Another American Suicide Attempt …

Another American Suicide Attempt …

It is an interesting question to contemplate whether a major section of the republic is attempting to expire through an imposed Chinese-Soviet style , God-hating lockdown , or a Nazi-style , narcissist crack-fantasy .
Their support for an asinine , motheaten , criminal huckster and his double-dealing , fraudulent , man-eating medusa suggests both are in play .
However , neither will endure .
The Soviet Union lasted sixty-nine years .
The Nazi ’ s malevolent chimera lasted twelve years , and even Mao ’ s brobdingnagian leap backwards was over in a decade , after which the Communist party @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ responsible for the most severe setback and the heaviest losses suffered by the Party , the country , and the people since the founding of the People ’ s Republic.
” Of course , now the Chinese are dealing with another iteration of Mao , in the vile Xi Jinping , puppet master of the Democrat Party .
During the “ Cultural Revolution , ” China was infected by a mass cult hysteria , with angry mobs ( antecedents of Antifa , BLM and COVID-maskers ) shaking Mao ’ s Little Red @ @ @ @ @ @ @ looked remotely educated , middle class , intelligent , or prosperous .
Today , it will be A Promised Land , ghoul-written on behalf of the worst president in American history , and soon to flood Amazon ’ s massive distribution network .
In keeping with the upside-down , inside-out comprehension of reality enjoyed by the left , A Promised Land promises to “ provide an honest accounting of my presidency , the forces we grapple with as a nation , and how we can heal our divisions and make democracy work for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ option — death by laughter .
Suicide is an irrational act .
Those of us who voted for Trump voted for sanity , life , reason , truth , and goodness .
Therefore , the victory is ours — and the left knows it .
That is why they are out to destroy us .
But you can not destroy the truth .
It is they who have shot themselves in the foot , poked their eyes out , poured cement into their ears and boarded up their minds .
They have turned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ house their own insanity .
To succeed , they need to demand we all become psychotic inmates .
Zyklon B was pumped into Nazi gas chambers to exterminate the sane .
Xi Jinping is perpetrating genocide in China through his death camps .
However , nothing so messy for the Democrats .
They plan to track our every footprint , care of Big Tech , and anaesthetize us , care of Big Pharma .
Instead of being branded as the Jews were , we will be implanted with chips and infected with rogue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from COVID lockdown .
After COVID , there will be another manufactured plague , until we are lost in absurdity , like Biden in his basement dotage .
Drug dealers are the left ’ s high priests of Thanatos , ( who carries the dead to the underworld ) , and they are worshiped by the human trafficking , illegal drug , and organ-harvesting industries , so beloved of the global monopolists , their Democrat partners and their hedge-fund money launderers .
Our children dying in the streets from narcotic overdoses are merely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the warpath against this evil .
Small wonder the traffickers of evil will murder their grandmothers to get rid of him .
So , there is nothing for it !
We must continue Trump ’ s battle against those who wish to ravage our sanity , as they have raped our cities , spat on our Constitution , vomited across the information platform , and turned government into a racket and Ponzi scheme .
Last year I picked up an interesting book , Not I – Memoirs of a German Childhood by Joachim @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dietrich Bonhoeffer , who tirelessly opposed Hitler and was martyred for his opposition , there were few Germans who defied the Nazis .
On the contrary , they voted for Hitler in their millions , having been brainwashed by their media ( like the Biden voters ) and they never bothered to read Mein Kampf .
Hitler ’ s victory infected almost the entire population with Nazi dementia .
Joachim Fest ’ s father was one of the few who remained sane , and the book relates how the family clung onto their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The Fest family is our model .
A light kept alive in the darkness .
Whether the left ’ s eclipse of reason is madness by pretense or madness by self-delusion is a moot point .
Those who swallow lies become liars .
Therefore , both must disguise their madness from themselves .
No wonder it is Democrats who insist on masks .
What the left fears most is to be unmasked , just as those who suffer from eisoptrophobia , fear the sight of their true reflection .
Let ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ faces .
We ’ ll scatter them in the hallucination of their grotesque wits , once and for all , and restore the Republic to sanity .
They can ’ t destroy us all .
Let us help them destroy themselves .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

Another American Suicide Attempt
By: Diana Mary Sitek
It is an interesting question to contemplate whether a major section of the republic is attempting to expire through an imposed Chinese-Soviet style, God-hating lockdown, or a Nazi-style, narcissist crack-fantasy. Their support for an asinine, motheaten, criminal huckster and his double-dealing, fraudulent, man-eating medusa suggests both are in play.
However, neither will endure. The Soviet Union lasted sixty-nine years. The Nazi’s malevolent chimera lasted twelve years, and even Mao’s brobdingnagian leap backwards was over in a decade, after which the Communist party itself opined that the Cultural Revolution was “responsible for the most severe setback and the heaviest losses suffered by the Party, the country, and the people since the founding of the People’s Republic.” Of course, now the Chinese are dealing with another iteration of Mao, in the vile Xi Jinping, puppet master of the Democrat Party.
During the “Cultural Revolution,” China was infected by a mass cult hysteria, with angry mobs (antecedents of Antifa, BLM and COVID-maskers) shaking Mao’s Little Red Book into the faces of anyone who looked remotely educated, middle class, intelligent, or prosperous. Today, it will be A Promised Land, ghoul-written on behalf of the worst president in American history, and soon to flood Amazon’s massive distribution network.
In keeping with the upside-down, inside-out comprehension of reality enjoyed by the left, A Promised Land promises to “provide an honest accounting of my presidency, the forces we grapple with as a nation, and how we can heal our divisions and make democracy work for everybody.” This leads to the third option — death by laughter.
Suicide is an irrational act. Those of us who voted for Trump voted for sanity, life, reason, truth, and goodness. Therefore, the victory is ours — and the left knows it. That is why they are out to destroy us. But you cannot destroy the truth. It is they who have shot themselves in the foot, poked their eyes out, poured cement into their ears and boarded up their minds. They have turned the nation into a padded cell to house their own insanity. To succeed, they need to demand we all become psychotic inmates.
Zyklon B was pumped into Nazi gas chambers to exterminate the sane. Xi Jinping is perpetrating genocide in China through his death camps. However, nothing so messy for the Democrats. They plan to track our every footprint, care of Big Tech, and anaesthetize us, care of Big Pharma. Instead of being branded as the Jews were, we will be implanted with chips and infected with rogue vaccines as the only permitted escape route from COVID lockdown. After COVID, there will be another manufactured plague, until we are lost in absurdity, like Biden in his basement dotage.
Drug dealers are the left’s high priests of Thanatos, (who carries the dead to the underworld), and they are worshiped by the human trafficking, illegal drug, and organ-harvesting industries, so beloved of the global monopolists, their Democrat partners and their hedge-fund money launderers. Our children dying in the streets from narcotic overdoses are merely collateral damage. President Trump went on the warpath against this evil. Small wonder the traffickers of evil will murder their grandmothers to get rid of him.
So, there is nothing for it! We must continue Trump’s battle against those who wish to ravage our sanity, as they have raped our cities, spat on our Constitution, vomited across the information platform, and turned government into a racket and Ponzi scheme.
Last year I picked up an interesting book, Not I – Memoirs of a German Childhood by Joachim Fest. Apart from the great Christian Dietrich Bonhoeffer, who tirelessly opposed Hitler and was martyred for his opposition, there were few Germans who defied the Nazis. On the contrary, they voted for Hitler in their millions, having been brainwashed by their media (like the Biden voters) and they never bothered to read Mein Kampf. Hitler’s victory infected almost the entire population with Nazi dementia. Joachim Fest’s father was one of the few who remained sane, and the book relates how the family clung onto their moral convictions during the brutalizing Hitler years. The Fest family is our model. A light kept alive in the darkness.
Whether the left’s eclipse of reason is madness by pretense or madness by self-delusion is a moot point. Those who swallow lies become liars. Therefore, both must disguise their madness from themselves. No wonder it is Democrats who insist on masks. What the left fears most is to be unmasked, just as those who suffer from eisoptrophobia, fear the sight of their true reflection.
Let’s hold a mirror close to their lying faces. We’ll scatter them in the hallucination of their grotesque wits, once and for all, and restore the Republic to sanity.
They can’t destroy us all. Let us help them destroy themselves.
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-05--Hydroxy: following Sanofi’s refusal, Prof. Raoult asks Gov to Open up the Market

ER Editor : The French medicines agency ( ANSM ) has refused a temporary authorization to dispense hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of Covid-19 .
In turn , Professor Didier Raoult has launched criminal proceedings against it , while appealing to the Conseil d ’ Etat ( council of state ) .
Sanofi Laboratory , meanwhile , has told the health minister , Olivier Veran ( a very politicized doctor who dislikes Raoult ) , that it can not supply enough HCQ , so Raoult is requesting Veran open up the market to other HCQ manufacturers to make up the shortfall @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the works based on the charge of failing to provide HCQ which endangers the lives of patients .
Which leaves Veran open to this charge , too .
Hydroxychloroquine , following Sanofi ’ s refusal , Didier Raoult asked the Minister for the possibility of opening the market Last week , Professor Raoult decided to attack the director of the National Agency of Health and Medicines in criminal proceedings for non-assistance to a person in danger and is appealing to the Council of State following the refusal of the ANSM to give @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a treatment in the context of Covid-19 .
( ER : ANSM is the French medicines agency ) Yesterday , Sanofi wrote to the Minister of Health putting the supply decision in the hands of Minister Olivier Véran .
The President of Sanofi France states : “ Thus , apart from any official recommendation that could , if necessary , emanate from your Ministry regarding the off-label use of our specialty Plaquenil® as part of the treatment of Covid-19 , I would like to inform you that it is impossible for us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in quantities that are always significant , in order to preserve the interest and safety of patients but also to protect our laboratory.
” “ In a debate that does not fall within our sphere of decision as a company operating in this specialty , I wish today to defer to the wisdom of the Government and more specifically to that of your Ministry , the only legitimate one to decide this delicate issue.
” Today , it was the IHU ( ER : Prof. Raoult ’ s hospital department in Marseille ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Minister on this subject , asking him to open up the hydroxychloroquine market to international competition , highlighting the harm to the treatment of patients .
Following the ANSM ’ s refusal to grant our request for RTU ( ER : temporary authorization of use ) , the President of Sanofi France , in his letter dated October 30 , asked you to take a position on the off-label use of its PLAQUENIL® specialty in the context of the treatment of COVID-19 .
Since then , the laboratory has refused to follow up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and our patients no longer have access to treatment .
This refusal of sale by the Sanofi laboratory is detrimental to our patients and we are asking you for authorization to open the hydroxychloroquine market to international competition ( Novartis , Sandoz , Mylan… ) .
We are waiting for your answer to start the necessary regulatory steps to import this specialty .
Yours sincerely “ .
The decision is thus only on the refusal of the RTU which was brought by the IHU and its lawyer di Vizio before the Council @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now have to decide whether he accepts the opening of the hydroxychloroquine market to the international market .
Accepting would allow the IHU to continue treating patients as it has done since the beginning .
A refusal would surely be an additional piece of evidence in the context of the referral file to the Council of State .
In any case , having been the subject of a search , the Minister should cautiously refer the matter to the various health authorities and the Scientific Committee , in the context of this issue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because the lives of patients could be endangered .
A pre-publication published today on the MedRixv website , by medical researchers from the University of Sao Paolo in Brazil and Brown University in the United States , could be useful : For every 1,000 Covid-19 positive cases , early detection and early pharmacological approaches resulted in a minimum of 140 patients not being hospitalized ( p < 0.0001 ) , 50 not being mechanically ventilated , and five ( 5 ) deaths avoided , taking into consideration age , gender and co-morbidities with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time of diagnosis .
The authors conclude that the apparent benefits of combining early detection and early pharmacological approaches for COVID-19 have been shown to have a favourable effect compared to different control groups of untreated patients .
The potential benefits could allow a large number of patients prevented from being hospitalized , dying and having persistent symptoms after remission of COVID-19 .
The potential impact on the disease course of COVID-19 and the number of negative results and well-established safety profile of the drugs proposed by the pre-AndroCoV trial have led to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials ( RCTs ) for the first Covid-19 .
Initial pharmacological approaches , including azithromycin in combination with one of the options of nitazoxanide , ivermectin or possibly hydroxychloroquine , should be considered for those who have been diagnosed with Covid-19 with less than seven days of symptoms .
Of the three drugs , we have chosen nitazoxanide because of a broader demonstration of antiviral activity in vitro and in vivo , proven efficacy against other viruses in humans , and a more stable safety profile .
This prepublication would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and also avoids death ( at higher rates than the “ 2 Scientific Councils ” which give 3 % going to hospital , 0.3 % in emergency and 0.01 % mortality ) .
In other words , a dual therapy ( azithromycin + hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin or nitazoxanide ) avoids even more severe cases of going to resuscitation .
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

ER Editor: The French medicines agency (ANSM) has refused a temporary authorization to dispense hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of Covid-19. In turn, Professor Didier Raoult has launched criminal proceedings against it, while appealing to the Conseil d’Etat (council of state).
Sanofi Laboratory, meanwhile, has told the health minister, Olivier Veran (a very politicized doctor who dislikes Raoult), that it cannot supply enough HCQ, so Raoult is requesting Veran open up the market to other HCQ manufacturers to make up the shortfall. This, with the criminal proceedings in the works based on the charge of failing to provide HCQ which endangers the lives of patients. Which leaves Veran open to this charge, too.
********
Hydroxychloroquine, following Sanofi’s refusal, Didier Raoult asked the Minister for the possibility of opening the market
FRANCE SOIR
Last week, Professor Raoult decided to attack the director of the National Agency of Health and Medicines in criminal proceedings for non-assistance to a person in danger and is appealing to the Council of State following the refusal of the ANSM to give a temporary authorization of use for hydroxychloroquine as a treatment in the context of Covid-19. (ER: ANSM is the French medicines agency)
Yesterday, Sanofi wrote to the Minister of Health putting the supply decision in the hands of Minister Olivier Véran. The President of Sanofi France states:
“Thus, apart from any official recommendation that could, if necessary, emanate from your Ministry regarding the off-label use of our specialty Plaquenil® as part of the treatment of Covid-19, I would like to inform you that it is impossible for us to follow up on orders for AP-HM in quantities that are always significant, in order to preserve the interest and safety of patients but also to protect our laboratory.”
“In a debate that does not fall within our sphere of decision as a company operating in this specialty, I wish today to defer to the wisdom of the Government and more specifically to that of your Ministry, the only legitimate one to decide this delicate issue.”
Today, it was the IHU (ER: Prof. Raoult’s hospital department in Marseille) and Professor Raoult who wrote to the Minister on this subject, asking him to open up the hydroxychloroquine market to international competition, highlighting the harm to the treatment of patients.
“Mr. Minister, Following the ANSM’s refusal to grant our request for RTU (ER: temporary authorization of use), the President of Sanofi France, in his letter dated October 30, asked you to take a position on the off-label use of its PLAQUENIL® specialty in the context of the treatment of COVID-19. Since then, the laboratory has refused to follow up on orders placed by our central pharmacy, and our patients no longer have access to treatment. This refusal of sale by the Sanofi laboratory is detrimental to our patients and we are asking you for authorization to open the hydroxychloroquine market to international competition (Novartis, Sandoz, Mylan…). We are waiting for your answer to start the necessary regulatory steps to import this specialty. Yours sincerely “.
The decision is thus only on the refusal of the RTU which was brought by the IHU and its lawyer di Vizio before the Council of State, but the Minister will now have to decide whether he accepts the opening of the hydroxychloroquine market to the international market.
Accepting would allow the IHU to continue treating patients as it has done since the beginning. A refusal would surely be an additional piece of evidence in the context of the referral file to the Council of State. In any case, having been the subject of a search, the Minister should cautiously refer the matter to the various health authorities and the Scientific Committee, in the context of this issue which requires an important and urgent decision because the lives of patients could be endangered.
A pre-publication published today on the MedRixv website, by medical researchers from the University of Sao Paolo in Brazil and Brown University in the United States, could be useful:
For every 1,000 Covid-19 positive cases, early detection and early pharmacological approaches resulted in a minimum of 140 patients not being hospitalized (p < 0.0001), 50 not being mechanically ventilated, and five (5) deaths avoided, taking into consideration age, gender and co-morbidities with patients of similar disease severity at the time of diagnosis. The authors conclude that the apparent benefits of combining early detection and early pharmacological approaches for COVID-19 have been shown to have a favourable effect compared to different control groups of untreated patients. The potential benefits could allow a large number of patients prevented from being hospitalized, dying and having persistent symptoms after remission of COVID-19. The potential impact on the disease course of COVID-19 and the number of negative results and well-established safety profile of the drugs proposed by the pre-AndroCoV trial have led to ethical questions regarding the conduct of other randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) for the first Covid-19. Initial pharmacological approaches, including azithromycin in combination with one of the options of nitazoxanide, ivermectin or possibly hydroxychloroquine, should be considered for those who have been diagnosed with Covid-19 with less than seven days of symptoms. Of the three drugs, we have chosen nitazoxanide because of a broader demonstration of antiviral activity in vitro and in vivo, proven efficacy against other viruses in humans, and a more stable safety profile.
This prepublication would show that it avoids saturating emergency departments and also avoids death (at higher rates than the “2 Scientific Councils” which give 3% going to hospital, 0.3% in emergency and 0.01% mortality). In other words, a dual therapy (azithromycin + hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin or nitazoxanide) avoids even more severe cases of going to resuscitation.
************
Source
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-05--NHS Whistleblower Resigns: ‘No Work for 3 weeks’, Flu/Covid Classed the Same

ER Editor : Shelley Tasker , a very articulate person , gives a 5-minute public speech announcing her resignation .
It ’ s well worth our time .
Here is the Facebook link .
She basically confirms everything we ’ ve published on thus far .
We also recommend this piece we published a few days ago : Flu Cases Are Way Down – Beware of the ‘ Obvious ’ Explanations [ VIDEO ] .
A whistleblower NHS worker has publicly resigned and claimed she had ‘ no work for three weeks ’ at the height of the pandemic .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ – believed to be a healthcare assistant at Treliske hospital , which is part of the Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust – telling members of the public what is ‘ really going on ’ behind closed doors in NHS hospitals .
In the clip filmed outside a church with a crowd gathering , Shelley , from Camborne , Cornwall , takes to a microphone and says : ‘ As much as I ’ ve always loved our NHS , it ’ s no longer our NHS .
It ’ s run by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ company .
‘ We no longer have health care , we can ’ t see dentists .
I can tell you now when I was working at the height of the pandemic I had no work for three weeks because there were no patients .
We have a particular Covid ward .
None of the wards were overflowing with Covid patients and they ’ re not now.
’ She went on to claim that the flu and Covid cases are now recorded as ‘ the same thing ’ on death certificates .
Shelley @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Today I am publicly resigning OK ?
I am wearing this uniform sadly for the last time .
I absolutely loved my job , those of you who have been following what ’ s going on , we ’ ve done tasks , we ’ ve organised protests , I ’ ve had a lot of flack .
‘ We ’ re at the point now it ’ s all coming back to me .
I ’ ve had an email from work last night asking me what ’ s going on , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can ’ t lie any more .
‘ I did something really bad .
I took a screenshot on Friday which shows the figures of how many people are in Treliske hospital with Covid and I shared it , because this should be public information.
’ In response to cheers from the crowd , she continues : ‘ I can tell you on Friday in Treliske there were three people in with Covid .
No extra deaths , three – and that covers Treliske , West Cornwall and Hayle hospital .
‘ The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seven months , is 76 people – that ’ s about ten people a month over the last seven months , and we have locked down .
‘ Lots of people have to start speaking out , there ’ s lot of doctors and nurses who have come forward .
They ’ re all on restrictive duties , they ’ re all seeing solicitors etc.
’ Shelley says that on Friday in Treliske there were three people in with Covid – which covers Treliske , West Cornwall and Hayle hospital ‘ I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , I have gone against the rules of the NHS and have shared confidential information that people need to see .
‘ Shelley goes on to allege that anyone who thinks lockdown is going to make a difference are ‘ completely wrong.
’ ‘ Our economy is going to crash , small businesses , people are going to starve , ’ she says .
‘ You think it ’ s going to be a month ?
We were flattening the curve back in April – and this was when the disease was supposedly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ then.
’ ‘ Why are our children allowed to go to school but we have to carry on ?
Because at the moment , they want us to work .
But that ’ s not going to happen because the schools will be closed soon .
‘ So the cases in the hospital , there ’ s three people in Treliske hospital with Covid – that was on Friday .
She went on to claim that the flu and Covid cases are now recorded as the same thing .
‘ If you died @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on your death certificate , ’ she explains .
‘ You may not realise as well that the flu numbers have gone right down .
Where have they gone ?
’ ‘ The PCR tests were not designed for diagnosing this disease – 94 per cent of them are false positives .
We say no , to no more lockdowns .
’

ER Editor: Shelley Tasker, a very articulate person, gives a 5-minute public speech announcing her resignation. It’s well worth our time. Here is the Facebook link. She basically confirms everything we’ve published on thus far.
We also recommend this piece we published a few days ago: Flu Cases Are Way Down – Beware of the ‘Obvious’ Explanations [VIDEO].
********
A whistleblower NHS worker has publicly resigned and claimed she had ‘no work for three weeks’ at the height of the pandemic.
A viral Facebook video shows Shelley Tasker – believed to be a healthcare assistant at Treliske hospital, which is part of the Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust – telling members of the public what is ‘really going on’ behind closed doors in NHS hospitals.
In the clip filmed outside a church with a crowd gathering, Shelley, from Camborne, Cornwall, takes to a microphone and says:
‘As much as I’ve always loved our NHS, it’s no longer our NHS. It’s run by the corrupt government and the people running this company.
‘We no longer have health care, we can’t see dentists. I can tell you now when I was working at the height of the pandemic I had no work for three weeks because there were no patients. We have a particular Covid ward. None of the wards were overflowing with Covid patients and they’re not now.’
She went on to claim that the flu and Covid cases are now recorded as ‘the same thing’ on death certificates.
Charlie Rainbow took to Facebook to share a video of Cornwall Freedom Rally speech from Shelley Tasker (pictured) as she publicly resigned
NHS worker Shelley (pictured) claimed that when she was working at the height of the pandemic she had no work for three weeks because there were no patients
The Facebook page was quickly flooded with comments, including one person who wrote: ‘Fantastic. Well done for speaking the truth’ (pictured)
Shelley starts her speech by saying:
‘Today I am publicly resigning OK? I am wearing this uniform sadly for the last time. I absolutely loved my job, those of you who have been following what’s going on, we’ve done tasks, we’ve organised protests, I’ve had a lot of flack. ‘We’re at the point now it’s all coming back to me. I’ve had an email from work last night asking me what’s going on, people are reporting me and unfortunately I can’t lie any more. ‘I did something really bad. I took a screenshot on Friday which shows the figures of how many people are in Treliske hospital with Covid and I shared it, because this should be public information.’
In response to cheers from the crowd, she continues: ‘I can tell you on Friday in Treliske there were three people in with Covid. No extra deaths, three – and that covers Treliske, West Cornwall and Hayle hospital.
‘The total deaths from these three hospitals in seven months, is 76 people – that’s about ten people a month over the last seven months, and we have locked down.
‘Lots of people have to start speaking out, there’s lot of doctors and nurses who have come forward. They’re all on restrictive duties, they’re all seeing solicitors etc.’
Even during the peak of the first wave of coronavirus in the UK, Covid-19 patients never accounted for more than 30 per cent of all hospital patients and tens of thousands of vacated beds went unused during the spring
A leaked NHS report suggests there are still fewer than average numbers of beds in use in NHS hospital, despite normal hospital care resuming and a surge in the number of people who are being treated for Covid-19
Shelley says that on Friday in Treliske there were three people in with Covid – which covers Treliske, West Cornwall and Hayle hospital
‘I’ve decided there’s no point, I have gone against the rules of the NHS and have shared confidential information that people need to see. ‘
Shelley goes on to allege that anyone who thinks lockdown is going to make a difference are ‘completely wrong.’
‘Our economy is going to crash, small businesses, people are going to starve,’ she says. ‘You think it’s going to be a month? We were flattening the curve back in April – and this was when the disease was supposedly dying out. The lockdown came in then.’
‘Why are our children allowed to go to school but we have to carry on? Because at the moment, they want us to work. But that’s not going to happen because the schools will be closed soon.
‘So the cases in the hospital, there’s three people in Treliske hospital with Covid – that was on Friday.
She went on to claim that the flu and Covid cases are now recorded as the same thing.
During the speech, Shelley (pictured) went on to claim that the flu and Covid cases are now combined as the same thing
Many people took to the comments section to praise Shelley for speaking out (pictured)
‘If you died with Covid within 28 days that goes on your death certificate,’ she explains. ‘You may not realise as well that the flu numbers have gone right down. Where have they gone?’
‘The PCR tests were not designed for diagnosing this disease – 94 per cent of them are false positives. We say no, to no more lockdowns.’