thelibertybeacon--2020-07-27--The war on Reason – the true battle for Earth

Between the media , the government , the social media , information , disinformation , half truths and the informed or misinformed opinions of millions of human beings , each seeing the world from the unique viewpoint of their own education , experience and desires and each desperately trying to find certainties , the world can start to appear like a dreadful mess of confusion .
But underlying all that there are some simplicities , some basic principles that one can observe and state dispassionately .
I am going to try to state some here .
It may seem like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , indeed , I am because I am merely reminding you of what you already know but that knowing can become buried or lost sight of beneath the chatter , noise , kerfuffle and hysteria .
So here we go : On this planet there live around 7 billion human beings The vast majority of these are perfectly honest and decent and if you don ’ t mess them about or upset them , they will get along just fine .
A tiny minority of human beings are , to one degree or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in fact criminal .
For my purpose here , I define a criminal as a person who willingly and knowingly harms others for personal gratification or advantage .
Personal advantage includes money , wealth , sex , property , power and the enslavement of other human beings .
Laws and moral codes exist primarily to eliminate from the environment the harmful , contra-survival actions of criminals .
The sane , non-criminal majority recognise that for their own safety and happiness , the inhibition or elimination from the environment of criminal actions is vital @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conduct can be defined as a law or precept that assists the efforts of the honest , decent person to survive , flourish and prosper by inhibiting or eliminating from his or her environment the actions of criminals that inhibit or thwart their effort so to do .
An unjust law or precept is any law or precept that assists the effort of the criminal person to inhibit or thwart the survival efforts of the honest person .
Those of criminal ( insane ) disposition do not like just laws and will seek @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inhibit or nullify their enforcement .
The source of all efforts to nullify just laws is always one or more criminals .
Those of criminal intent will favour , propose , enact and enforce unjust laws , The source of all efforts to introduce or enforce unjust laws is always one or more criminal persons .
Some criminals are cleverer than others .
Governments and similar organisations , by virtue of the power they hold over large numbers of human beings , attract criminals who see in them extensive opportunities for the aforementioned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than any other type of human organisation , therefore attract criminals .
Thus a government is either ( a ) set up by criminals in the first place so as to empower and facilitate their criminal ambitions or ( b ) if set up by honest people , will become over time infiltrated or infested by criminals .
When sufficiently infested by criminals or criminal groups , cartels or networks , the policy-making and executive apparatus of a group can fall into criminal hands .
When that happens , the group itself enacts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a criminal group even while many – or even the majority – of its individual members are not criminals .
This happens with governments .
They attract criminals because of the opportunities they present .
This is not a new phenomenon and has been with us for as long as there have been governments and a minority of people of criminal intent .
When sufficiently infested with criminals , governments become criminal and operate against the interests of honest men .
The mechanics of the decay of governments are no more mysterious @ @ @ @ @ @ @ however in the interests of the criminal to make things appear otherwise because it is behind that smokescreen of complexity and confusion that he has installed in the hearts and minds of his fellows that he operates .
Honest people do not always perceive this because of that very smokescreen of confusion and also because , being decent , they often assume the motivations of others are as inherently decent and sincere and their actions as well meant as theirs whilst this is not always the case .
Thus , honest people can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their own decency , in essence , used against them – and they can wake up one fine day to find themselves the minions of some criminal empire .
Honest people tend to run things honestly , resolve their differences and get along .
Indeed , sane human beings will get along UNLESS actively prevented from doing so by criminal elements in their midst .
If people are not getting along , if things are sinking into deeper turmoil , disarray , conflict and upset , if the environment is becoming less sane @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so because they are bring MADE to do so contrary to the best efforts of honest people to achieve the opposite .
These symptoms are the sure sign that criminals are hard at work .
The cloak of respectability provided by the now-infiltrated great institutions of the land makes the person wearing the cloak no less a criminal if what he DOES from his position and with his power is criminal and results in the inhibition of the survival efforts of honest people .
By their deeds shall ye know them .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ NOT other honest people .
The natural enemy ( survival suppressor ) of an honest person in London is NOT the honest person in Moscow , Baghdad or New York .
It is the criminal , whoever he happens to be and from wheresoever he happens to be operating .
Criminals will naturally , for their own protection and to avoid censure for or inhibition of their criminal actions , seek to persuade or dupe honest people into wrong-targeting other honest people for their ire , retribution or imagined justice .
Thus we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of civilisations and we see right there a fundamental error that must be corrected if we wish a just and decent civilisation to exist and to endure for the benefit and support of all honest people .
The above was originally featured on UK Reloaded

by Fabian Ubiquitus
Between the media, the government, the social media, information, disinformation, half truths and the informed or misinformed opinions of millions of human beings, each seeing the world from the unique viewpoint of their own education, experience and desires and each desperately trying to find certainties, the world can start to appear like a dreadful mess of confusion.
But underlying all that there are some simplicities, some basic principles that one can observe and state dispassionately.
I am going to try to state some here. It may seem like I am stating the blindingly obvious and, indeed, I am because I am merely reminding you of what you already know but that knowing can become buried or lost sight of beneath the chatter, noise, kerfuffle and hysteria.
So here we go:
On this planet there live around 7 billion human beings
The vast majority of these are perfectly honest and decent and if you don’t mess them about or upset them, they will get along just fine.
A tiny minority of human beings are, to one degree or another, not so decent and are in fact criminal. For my purpose here, I define a criminal as a person who willingly and knowingly harms others for personal gratification or advantage. Personal advantage includes money, wealth, sex, property, power and the enslavement of other human beings.
Laws and moral codes exist primarily to eliminate from the environment the harmful, contra-survival actions of criminals. The sane, non-criminal majority recognise that for their own safety and happiness, the inhibition or elimination from the environment of criminal actions is vital.
A just law or code of conduct can be defined as a law or precept that assists the efforts of the honest, decent person to survive, flourish and prosper by inhibiting or eliminating from his or her environment the actions of criminals that inhibit or thwart their effort so to do.
An unjust law or precept is any law or precept that assists the effort of the criminal person to inhibit or thwart the survival efforts of the honest person.
Those of criminal (insane) disposition do not like just laws and will seek to eliminate them, avoid them or inhibit or nullify their enforcement. The source of all efforts to nullify just laws is always one or more criminals.
Those of criminal intent will favour, propose, enact and enforce unjust laws, The source of all efforts to introduce or enforce unjust laws is always one or more criminal persons.
Some criminals are cleverer than others.
Governments and similar organisations, by virtue of the power they hold over large numbers of human beings, attract criminals who see in them extensive opportunities for the aforementioned personal gratification.
Governments, perhaps more than any other type of human organisation, therefore attract criminals.
Thus a government is either (a) set up by criminals in the first place so as to empower and facilitate their criminal ambitions or (b) if set up by honest people, will become over time infiltrated or infested by criminals.
When sufficiently infested by criminals or criminal groups, cartels or networks, the policy-making and executive apparatus of a group can fall into criminal hands. When that happens, the group itself enacts criminal policies and unjust laws and acts as a criminal group even while many – or even the majority – of its individual members are not criminals.
This happens with governments.
They attract criminals because of the opportunities they present.
This is not a new phenomenon and has been with us for as long as there have been governments and a minority of people of criminal intent.
When sufficiently infested with criminals, governments become criminal and operate against the interests of honest men.
The mechanics of the decay of governments are no more mysterious or complex than that. It is however in the interests of the criminal to make things appear otherwise because it is behind that smokescreen of complexity and confusion that he has installed in the hearts and minds of his fellows that he operates.
Honest people do not always perceive this because of that very smokescreen of confusion and also because, being decent, they often assume the motivations of others are as inherently decent and sincere and their actions as well meant as theirs whilst this is not always the case.
Thus, honest people can be hoodwinked and outsmarted by criminals – their own decency, in essence, used against them – and they can wake up one fine day to find themselves the minions of some criminal empire.
Honest people tend to run things honestly, resolve their differences and get along. Indeed, sane human beings will get along UNLESS actively prevented from doing so by criminal elements in their midst.
If people are not getting along, if things are sinking into deeper turmoil, disarray, conflict and upset, if the environment is becoming less sane and more dangerous, they are doing so because they are bring MADE to do so contrary to the best efforts of honest people to achieve the opposite. These symptoms are the sure sign that criminals are hard at work.
The cloak of respectability provided by the now-infiltrated great institutions of the land makes the person wearing the cloak no less a criminal if what he DOES from his position and with his power is criminal and results in the inhibition of the survival efforts of honest people.
By their deeds shall ye know them.
The common enemy of ALL honest people is NOT other honest people. The natural enemy (survival suppressor) of an honest person in London is NOT the honest person in Moscow, Baghdad or New York.
It is the criminal, whoever he happens to be and from wheresoever he happens to be operating.
Criminals will naturally, for their own protection and to avoid censure for or inhibition of their criminal actions, seek to persuade or dupe honest people into wrong-targeting other honest people for their ire, retribution or imagined justice.
Thus we have wars and conflict and the fall of civilisations and we see right there a fundamental error that must be corrected if we wish a just and decent civilisation to exist and to endure for the benefit and support of all honest people.
The above was originally featured on UK Reloaded
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-07-26--Saturday Night in America [Video]

Saturday Night in America [Video]

Saturday night in America used to call for families to relax and wind-down from the week .
The older generation listened to their favorite Radio Program or watched their favorite TV show .
The younger kids raised a little hell in their own way in the neighborhood until ( time to go in ) Dark .
About that same time older teens hit the rubber to be with their favorite girl and assemble with other teens at the local drive-in “ Hamburger Palace ” or Drive-in Theater to ‘ make out ’ while on the movie screen “ Frankie and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That was the first feature followed by Monsters drinking blood or plugging each other into High Voltage panels until their hair was sticking out straight .
At the end of a Saturday night in America if you were in the country all you heard was the chirping of Crickets and the occasional Bull Frog singing Bass .
In the city , a few kids yelling across the street to a friend out the window of their Tenement building while the Street Sweeper below laid down a misty stream of water from whirling brushes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s conclusion is pretty much the same today as it was then .
NOT IN THE CITY Back of my neck getting dirty and gritty Been down , isn ’ t it a pity Doesn ’ t seem to be a shadow in the city All around , people looking half dead Walking on the sidewalk , hotter than a match head But at night it ’ s a different world… .
Perhaps you remember that song from The Lovin ’ Spoonful Night time in the city is “ a different world ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in 2020 .
There is so much to report it is almost impossible to do it all in one setting before the next wave of violence or some other form of Tyranny pokes up it ’ s ugly head to challenge our Liberty and Freedom .
To that end we are posting head-line links for you to choose from , published by RT-USA News .
Police declare riot in Portland after protesters pull down courthouse fence ( VIDEOS ) ‘ Agitators ’ set fire to Oakland courthouse & attack police station as hundreds @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , VIDEOS ) Protester shoots fellow demonstrator while aiming at car that sped through crowd on highway in Aurora , Colorado ( VIDEO ) One person killed in shooting during protest in Austin , Texas ( VIDEO ) Member of black-only NFAC militia reportedly SHOOTS HIMSELF by mistake at Louisville rally ( VIDEO ) And a Hell Raiser , night or day , George Carlin with some realistic Comic Relief … Before you watch Carlin , you might like to know what one viewer after a preview said : “ T his tweet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was talking about BOTH parties , Repub and Dem , being the Club , and we the people aren ’ t in it .
Making it about Trump and only Trump is Historical Revisionism of the highest order.
” And to that we say… yep that ’ s how Dem ’ s operate .
( TLB ) ed .
Anti-Trump # Resistance counts George Carlin among its ranks , but the late , great comedian hated all politicians equally ( TLB ) compiled this video report from RT-USA News… Not only because we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at MSM in America like to put out propaganda rather than a balanced news article .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .
Disclaimer : The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including , but not limited to , text , graphics , images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction .
Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice , diagnosis or treatment .

Saturday Night in America
Saturday night in America is far from what it used to be, especially in Major U.S. Cities.
The Liberty Beacon Staff
Saturday night in America used to call for families to relax and wind-down from the week. The older generation listened to their favorite Radio Program or watched their favorite TV show. The younger kids raised a little hell in their own way in the neighborhood until (time to go in) Dark. About that same time older teens hit the rubber to be with their favorite girl and assemble with other teens at the local drive-in “Hamburger Palace” or Drive-in Theater to ‘make out’ while on the movie screen “Frankie and Annette” played on the beach. That was the first feature followed by Monsters drinking blood or plugging each other into High Voltage panels until their hair was sticking out straight.
At the end of a Saturday night in America if you were in the country all you heard was the chirping of Crickets and the occasional Bull Frog singing Bass. In the city, a few kids yelling across the street to a friend out the window of their Tenement building while the Street Sweeper below laid down a misty stream of water from whirling brushes.
In the Country Saturday Night’s conclusion is pretty much the same today as it was then.
NOT IN THE CITY
Hot town, summer in the city
Back of my neck getting dirty and gritty
Been down, isn’t it a pity
Doesn’t seem to be a shadow in the city
All around, people looking half dead
Walking on the sidewalk, hotter than a match head
.
But at night it’s a different world….
.
Perhaps you remember that song from The Lovin’ Spoonful
Night time in the city is “a different world” not just on Saturday, but 24/7 in 2020.
There is so much to report it is almost impossible to do it all in one setting before the next wave of violence or some other form of Tyranny pokes up it’s ugly head to challenge our Liberty and Freedom. To that end we are posting head-line links for you to choose from, published by RT-USA News.
And a Hell Raiser, night or day, George Carlin with some realistic Comic Relief …
Before you watch Carlin, you might like to know what one viewer after a preview said: “T his tweet is so so wrong. George Carlin was talking about BOTH parties, Repub and Dem, being the Club, and we the people aren’t in it. Making it about Trump and only Trump is Historical Revisionism of the highest order.” #americawakeup
*********
(TLB) compiled this video report from RT-USA News… Not only because we could, but the Winnie’s at MSM in America like to put out propaganda rather than a balanced news article.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-07-26--Explained: America’s Fact-Free Lockdown Hysteria [Video]

Nothing about the current lockdown hysteria makes any sense .
The same could be said for how government and the mainstream media are reporting the actually coronavirus and COVID-19 disease .
The numbers simply do not add up , nor does the the level of hysteria in relation to the actual threat to overall public health posed by the virus itself .
Clearly , the ‘ cure ’ is already way worse than the disease .
Can western society recover from this epic boondoggle ?
Author and Fellow at Mises University , Thomas Woods , puts America and the world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ perspective .
The following presentation was recorded at the Mises Institute in Auburn , Alabama , on 16 July 2020 .
Watch : Download a free copy of his e-book : Your Facebook Friends Are Wrong About the Lockdown ( TLB ) published this video presentation from 21Wire with our sincere gratitude for this perspective .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .
Disclaimer : The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including , but not limited to , text , graphics , images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a substitute for professional medical advice , diagnosis or treatment .

Explained: America’s Fact-Free Lockdown Hysteria
BY
Nothing about the current lockdown hysteria makes any sense. The same could be said for how government and the mainstream media are reporting the actually coronavirus and COVID-19 disease. The numbers simply do not add up, nor does the the level of hysteria in relation to the actual threat to overall public health posed by the virus itself. Clearly, the ‘cure’ is already way worse than the disease. Can western society recover from this epic boondoggle?
Author and Fellow at Mises University, Thomas Woods, puts America and the world’s current COVID crisis into proper perspective. The following presentation was recorded at the Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama, on 16 July 2020. Watch:
See presentation links at: http://tomwoods.com/lockdown/
Download a free copy of his e-book: Your Facebook Friends Are Wrong About the Lockdown
*********
(TLB) published this video presentation from 21Wire with our sincere gratitude for this perspective.
READ MORE COVID NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire COVID Files
SUPPORT 21WIRE’s INDEPENDENT MEDIA PLATFORM – BECOME A MEMBER @21WIRE.TV
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-07-28--Are Fake News Polls Hiding … A Potential Trump Landslide?

Listen to network or cable news and you will hear that the November election is over .
Joe Biden has a growing double-digit lead over President Trump , despite the election being over three months away and the issues that may decide the election largely unknown at present .
What do the polls say ?
Biden ’ s campaign manager , also known as CNN , has their “ poll of polls ” described as , “ the five most recent national telephone polls measuring the view of registered voters.
” Considering that only 58 percent of eligible voters went @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s “ poll of polls ” may not be particularly representative of the electorate .
CNN ’ s headline screams déjà vu , “ Biden maintains a double-digit lead over Trump nationally.
” That ’ s it then , the election is over .
Trump supporters may as well pack it up and stay home .
At least that is what they want you to believe .
Four years ago , the media was singing the same tune .
On June 26 , 2016 , Time reported , “ Democratic presidential candidate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump.
” How did that turn out ?
To Clinton ’ s credit , despite her falls , bizarre facial tics , needing to be carried into a van , and overall unlikability , she was generally coherent .
Unlike Biden who can ’ t get through a scripted interview without saying something incoherent , as he recently claimed his campaign attorneys are reaching out to “ voter registration physicians.
” Perhaps he was referring to the next Nolan Ryan , baseball pitcher Dr Fauci , who through his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election in a way Russia could only dream of .
Let ’ s look at CNN ’ s gaggle of polls .
The Washington Post – ABC News poll sampled 1,000 adults .
Not likely voters , not registered voters , not even eligible voters , just whoever answered the phone .
They also oversampled Democrats by 6 percentage points and their sample contained 399 Trump supporters compared to 522 Biden supporters , over a 25 percent advantage for Biden .
It ’ s no wonder their survey found Biden favored over Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sample .
Is this designed to inform or influence the electorate ?
The Quinnipiac University poll of registered voters , oversampled Democrats by 10 points , 34 to 24 percent .
Their poll favored Biden over Trump 52 to 37 percent , a 15-point margin , two-thirds of which is negated by the skewed poll sample .
The Fox News poll oversampled Democrats by 4 points with Biden winning by an 8-point margin .
Despite the voting preference for Biden , the poll was split evenly on whether Trump would be reelected .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” a discrepancy between who voters favor and who they think will win ?
A recent Monmouth University poll illustrated this phenomenon .
Voters favored Biden over Trump 53 to 40 percent but were evenly split on who they thought would actually win the election , Trump over Biden by 46 to 45 percent .
This is like asking a sports fan who they want to win the game versus who they think will win .
The latter question provides the more accurate prediction .
The Just the News Daily Poll might give @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s lead in half and gained 13 points among independents since last month , the group that may ultimately decide the election .
One of the most accurate polls in 2016 , Rasmussen Reports , showed Biden this week with only a two point advantage over Trump , 47 to 45 percent , among likely voters , even with a 4-point Democrat oversampling .
If the sample was equally balanced between Democrats and Republicans , Trump might have a 2-point advantage .
What about these “ secret voters ” ?
Might they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Institute ’ s poll revealed , This is the “ silent majority ” which Trump tweeted is “ alive and well.
” Which group would be afraid to speak out , Trump supporters or detractors ?
Trump-bashing is the norm in virtually all news media , on social media , academia , Hollywood , professional sports , and corporate America .
Share your political views and get cancelled , but only if your views are conservative or politically incorrect , the views of most Trump voters .
Here is a list of those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ police , cancelled due to old opinions or saying something verboten like “ all lives matter.
” Liberals are the only ones free to say what they really think , without consequence , as the Cato survey confirms .
Wearing a MAGA hat may get you beat up .
A Trump bumper sticker may get your car keyed .
A Bernie sticker will only get a laugh , not destruction .
It ’ s likely that the 62 percent afraid to speak out are predominantly Trump supporters , else why would they be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ friends , coworkers , or pollsters .
Is this group the silent majority , including self-described Democrats secretly supporting Trump ?
If a majority of Democrats are afraid to speak out .
Is this because they are uncomfortable supporting the radical leftist Democrat agenda among friends and family or are they disgusted by it , now favoring Trump , and unwilling to go public with their great awakening ?
How many Democrats and Independents make up this “ silent majority ” who may vote for Trump , but are afraid to share their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pro Trump views in a group setting may lead to being attacked , at least verbally from those who disagree .
Sharing far left views will only receive an awkward silence or at worst an eyeroll , but nothing more .
Guess which group is afraid to share their views , and likely their votes ?
Answer – conservative and Trump supporters .
Two last bits of good news for Trump .
The Rasmussen Daily Presidential Tracking Poll on June 24 gives Trump 49 percent total approval compared to Obama at 48 percent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reelection easily against Mitt Romney , a far more formidable candidate compared to Dementia Joe .
The internals of Rasmussen ’ s poll are horrific for Democrats .
31 percent of black likely voters approve of Trump .
In 2016 , Trump won only 6 percent of the black vote .
If he won 15 or 20 percent in November , only half this approval number , this becomes landslide territory .
If Democrats and the media truly believed Biden was on track to win easily , they would not be pushing for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
A large Biden poll lead now allows the left to prepare the narrative of electoral fraud since how else could Trump win against such a big lead .
If Democrats retain the House , expect another impeachment based on Trump somehow rigging the election to go from a Biden double digit lead now to a Trump landslide in November .
These polls are not meant to inform the electorate but to dispirit Trump supporters in the hopes that they throw in the towel and tune out from the election and voting .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ in 2016 and won ’ t work in 2020 .
Instead we might see a Trump landslide .

Listen to network or cable news and you will hear that the November election is over. Joe Biden has a growing double-digit lead over President Trump, despite the election being over three months away and the issues that may decide the election largely unknown at present.
What do the polls say? Biden’s campaign manager, also known as CNN, has their “poll of polls” described as, “the five most recent national telephone polls measuring the view of registered voters.” Considering that only 58 percent of eligible voters went to the polls in 2016, CNN’s “poll of polls” may not be particularly representative of the electorate.
CNN’s headline screams déjà vu, “Biden maintains a double-digit lead over Trump nationally.” That’s it then, the election is over. Trump supporters may as well pack it up and stay home. At least that is what they want you to believe.
Four years ago, the media was singing the same tune. On June 26, 2016, Time reported, “Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton holds a double-digit lead over presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump.” How did that turn out?
To Clinton’s credit, despite her falls, bizarre facial tics, needing to be carried into a van, and overall unlikability, she was generally coherent. Unlike Biden who can’t get through a scripted interview without saying something incoherent, as he recently claimed his campaign attorneys are reaching out to “voter registration physicians.”
Perhaps he was referring to the next Nolan Ryan, baseball pitcher Dr Fauci, who through his ever-changing recommendations is seeking to influence the election in a way Russia could only dream of.
Let’s look at CNN’s gaggle of polls. The Washington Post – ABC News poll sampled 1,000 adults. Not likely voters, not registered voters, not even eligible voters, just whoever answered the phone. They also oversampled Democrats by 6 percentage points and their sample contained 399 Trump supporters compared to 522 Biden supporters, over a 25 percent advantage for Biden.
It’s no wonder their survey found Biden favored over Trump 54 to 39 percent, reflecting the sample. Is this designed to inform or influence the electorate?
The Quinnipiac University poll of registered voters, oversampled Democrats by 10 points, 34 to 24 percent. Their poll favored Biden over Trump 52 to 37 percent, a 15-point margin, two-thirds of which is negated by the skewed poll sample.
The Fox News poll oversampled Democrats by 4 points with Biden winning by an 8-point margin. Despite the voting preference for Biden, the poll was split evenly on whether Trump would be reelected.
Are there “secret Trump voters,” a discrepancy between who voters favor and who they think will win? A recent Monmouth University poll illustrated this phenomenon. Voters favored Biden over Trump 53 to 40 percent but were evenly split on who they thought would actually win the election, Trump over Biden by 46 to 45 percent.
This is like asking a sports fan who they want to win the game versus who they think will win. The latter question provides the more accurate prediction.
The Just the News Daily Poll might give Biden some concern. Trump cut Biden’s lead in half and gained 13 points among independents since last month, the group that may ultimately decide the election.
One of the most accurate polls in 2016, Rasmussen Reports, showed Biden this week with only a two point advantage over Trump, 47 to 45 percent, among likely voters, even with a 4-point Democrat oversampling. If the sample was equally balanced between Democrats and Republicans, Trump might have a 2-point advantage.
What about these “secret voters”? Might they portend a Trump landslide? The Cato Institute’s poll revealed,
62 percent of Americans say they have political views they’re afraid to share.
These fears cross partisan lines. Majorities of Democrats (52%), independents (59%) and Republicans (77%) all agree they have political opinions they are afraid to share.
Strong liberals stand out, however, as the only political group who feel they can express themselves.
This is the “silent majority” which Trump tweeted is “alive and well.” Which group would be afraid to speak out, Trump supporters or detractors?
Trump-bashing is the norm in virtually all news media, on social media, academia, Hollywood, professional sports, and corporate America. Share your political views and get cancelled, but only if your views are conservative or politically incorrect, the views of most Trump voters.
Here is a list of those suffering the wrath of the modern thought police, cancelled due to old opinions or saying something verboten like “all lives matter.” Liberals are the only ones free to say what they really think, without consequence, as the Cato survey confirms.
Wearing a MAGA hat may get you beat up. A Trump bumper sticker may get your car keyed. A Bernie sticker will only get a laugh, not destruction. It’s likely that the 62 percent afraid to speak out are predominantly Trump supporters, else why would they be afraid to share their views, with friends, coworkers, or pollsters. Is this group the silent majority, including self-described Democrats secretly supporting Trump?
If a majority of Democrats are afraid to speak out. Is this because they are uncomfortable supporting the radical leftist Democrat agenda among friends and family or are they disgusted by it, now favoring Trump, and unwilling to go public with their great awakening? How many Democrats and Independents make up this “silent majority” who may vote for Trump, but are afraid to share their views?
As most know, sharing pro Trump views in a group setting may lead to being attacked, at least verbally from those who disagree. Sharing far left views will only receive an awkward silence or at worst an eyeroll, but nothing more. Guess which group is afraid to share their views, and likely their votes? Answer – conservative and Trump supporters.
Two last bits of good news for Trump. The Rasmussen Daily Presidential Tracking Poll on June 24 gives Trump 49 percent total approval compared to Obama at 48 percent exactly four years ago. Obama won reelection easily against Mitt Romney, a far more formidable candidate compared to Dementia Joe.
The internals of Rasmussen’s poll are horrific for Democrats. 31 percent of black likely voters approve of Trump. In 2016, Trump won only 6 percent of the black vote. If he won 15 or 20 percent in November, only half this approval number, this becomes landslide territory.
If Democrats and the media truly believed Biden was on track to win easily, they would not be pushing for mail in ballots or against voter ID. A large Biden poll lead now allows the left to prepare the narrative of electoral fraud since how else could Trump win against such a big lead. If Democrats retain the House, expect another impeachment based on Trump somehow rigging the election to go from a Biden double digit lead now to a Trump landslide in November.
These polls are not meant to inform the electorate but to dispirit Trump supporters in the hopes that they throw in the towel and tune out from the election and voting. Such information warfare didn’t work in 2016 and won’t work in 2020. Instead we might see a Trump landslide.


thelibertybeacon--2020-07-28--Doctor-Citizen Activism: Welcome to Italy’s ‘Hippocratic Movement’

ER Editor : What is now clearly crystallizing is the entire plandemic having been orchestrated around , at minimum , the shutdown of the family doctor ’ s ability to treat their own patients , especially regarding chloroquine drugs .
We published a very illuminating piece on this yesterday from France , which details government action to ensure that a ) patients wouldn ’ t even see their family practitioner during the crisis , and b ) those doctors wouldn ’ t be able to prescribe hydroxychloroquine , a a drug which has been freely available for decades pretty much @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Deliberately Sidelined Its Family Doctors .
Overcoming Fear : The Way Of the Hippocratic Movement This is how , on the occasion of the covid-19 health crisis , a movement of health professionals was born in Italy to put an end to media propaganda – through the corruption of Big Pharma – in order to offer the best treatments to patients in complete independence .
On many occasions during the Covid-19 pandemic , the question of possible treatments for the virus was raised and was very controversial .
.
At the initiative of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ passion for medicine who lives in Rodrigues ( Republic of Mauritius ) , a study group was set up and formalized under the association IppocrateOrg .
We are talking about it with Mauro , Maria , Adriana , Nicola and Massimo , founding members .
Mauro , can you summarize what happened ?
Mauro : I live in the Republic of Mauritius , on Rodrigues Island , 600 km east of Mauritius , the furthest point of Africa in the Indian Ocean .
I have always loved medicine , even though I am @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Covid-19 epidemic started , I started looking for possible therapies with doctor friends , which led me to the combination of azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine .
When the Coronavirus arrived in Italy and the first people started to die , I called my friend Dr. Alberto Palamidese , a pulmonologist , now retired .
He confirmed to me ( early March ) that the target organ of the virus was the lung and that there was interstitial pneumonia similar to Mycoplasma Pneumoniae which , if not treated immediately , resulted in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ me that in his time , the treatment included high-dose azithromycin cortisone , low molecular weight heparin , and the use of hyperimmune plasma .
During the first ten days of March , I phoned a very dear doctor friend of mine in the prevention department of USL-2 Umbria who told me that they treat all patients at the first symptoms with hydroxychloroquine 400 mg/day x 7 days and azithromycin 500 mg/day x 6 days at home .
With the exception of a few very rare hospitalizations , all cases were resolved within @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those in hospital ) .
Zero side effects .
At the same time , I learned that the local health authorities in Mauritius were stockpiling hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin .
I made enquiries with the authorities and , when the epidemic arrived , the plan ( which would then be announced by the Prime Minister ) was as follows : hydroxychloroquine , azithromycin , the same dosages as those used in Umbria and , for the most serious cases , hyperimmune plasma .
The same therapy was previously used in South Korea and eradicated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discovered that all my research always leads to the same result .
I started writing long e-mails to several newspapers explaining that the therapy existed , while in my home region , Veneto , former compatriots and friends were going to the hospital to die without any therapy , receiving only oxygen .
Then the carnage began in Lombardy .
I continued to write without anyone listening .
On 17 March , a document from AIFA ( Italian Medicines Agency ) authorised the off-label use of hydroxychloroquine , but also warned against simultaneous @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the QT curve and possible cardiac arrest for serious arrhythmias .
The circular of the federation of family doctors then recommends the use of hydroxychloroquine in the home , but few people , especially in northern Italy , use it in combination with azithromycin .
Even in many large hospitals , such as Tor Vergata in Rome or Cutugno in Naples , azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine have been used in combination since mid-March .
Then , finally , in mid-April , azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine therapy was considered by the hospitals of Lombardy and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ systematic way because many were trying , on the advice of virologists , immunologists and epidemiologists , antiviral treatment which had little effect .
In Piacenza , Professor Cavanna Primario Ospedaliero treated patients at home with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin without death or side effects .
In Germany , the extensive use of hydroxychloroquine , azithromycin and a large amount of hyperimmune plasma kept the mortality rate below 3 % .
But in great silence , as the Germans know how to do .
I suffered a great deal when I saw my compatriots @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I saw that the information in the media was occupied by laboratory doctors , experts of all kinds and statisticians and not by clinical doctors , particularly pneumologists , who could have treated the disease .
There was total confusion , and no one at the top was in charge of establishing the rules of treatment to be followed both at the territorial and hospital levels .
Each region , each hospital , but also each department and each general practitioner followed its own line of therapy .
I believe that another reason @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has led to catastrophic consequences is that part of the medical community has continued to follow the known path of validating scientific research , which is very time-consuming .
This attitude of waiting , in the hope of identifying a drug validated at all levels , has been confronted by another part of the medical community , more accustomed to filtering research results through the lens of personal clinical experience , of having cured patients based on the validation of the “ field result ” .
The clinical intuition of doctors , validated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ find no echo in the current scientific medical community .
The clinical experience proven by the healing records of many cases treated without any side effects seems to be less significant than a randomized study .
I would like to recall here the recent retrospective work of the Marseille group , which proved the validity of the protocol with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin on more than 3,700 Covid-19 patients .
( https : //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477893920302817 ) .
On May 5th , I receive a whatsapp message from a friend in Milan .
He tells me @ @ @ @ @ @ @ led by F. Fazio of Roberto Burioni , a virologist who is trying to stop the initiative of some doctors using hyperimmune plasma .
A huge wave of anger made me write my first whatsapp message on the subject .
I sent it to about 40 friends with a request to spread it to friends .
Since that day , my life has changed .
I ’ ve received thousands of whatsapp messages and thousands of emails .
Among the people who contacted me were also many doctors .
Many of them had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by pointing out that the cure already existed .
Immediately a group of serving and retired hospital doctors , local doctors and also nurses was formed to inform everyone about the therapeutic possibilities .
But also by thousands of citizens from different professions .
Who ’ s in the group right now and what do you do ?
The group began as a convergence of people with different professional skills and ideas , who found themselves wondering what could be done to find a cure for the coronavirus .
The first thing we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ things were working in practice .
In summary , since the beginning of March in the big hospitals in Rome , Neapolitana , Sardinia and Sicily , but certainly also in other realities that we do not know , hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin therapy has been used as the basic medicine that is still present .
Secondly , the different protocols between hospitals and between departments within the same hospital ( which shows the total absence of a director ) .
Some added vitamin C , cortisone , heparin , various antivirals and heparin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nucleus remaining of azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine .
In these hospitals , where the protocols contained the above-mentioned drugs , mortality was considerably reduced , even for those over 80 years of age with more pathologies .
Meanwhile , however , in the hospitals of Lombardy and Veneto , the number of deaths increased enormously , reaching a record mortality rate of 17 % in Lombardy .
My Youtube video on the 30,000 lives that could have been saved , after being viewed 9,000 times , has been deleted .
In response to our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clearly automatic , pre-packaged message indicating that the content was inappropriate .
With this group of doctors , and in dialogue with the coordinator of another group of territorial doctors who had widely used hydroxychloroquine with their patients , we carried out several initiatives , without giving them too much publicity , including : 1 .
With the help of a cardiologist ( Dr. Adriana Privitera ) and in order to dismantle the study published by The Lancet ( which led to the WHO decision to withdraw hydroxychloroquine from the trials and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of this drug without authorization ) , I personally sent a letter to The Lancet and the WHO , signed by about eighty Italian doctors .
Unlike The Guardian and the 120 scientists ( https : //zenodo.org/record/3862789 # .XvikvV9xfIX ) who attacked the study from a methodological point of view , we have shown that the deaths mentioned in the study occurred for two reasons : a .
Inclusion of patients whose disease is too advanced b .
Use of hydroxychloroquine in heart patients ( ischemic , decompensated and arrhythmic ) who should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ counted these deaths as a direct cause of the effects of the drug in question , and concluded that hydroxychloroquine was ineffective and dangerous , increasing mortality and arrhythmias .
These conclusions were shown to be medically and scientifically unreliable .
2 .
We wrote a letter to the President of the Republic , Mattarella , to explain the absurd position of AIFA asking him to intervene .
We are now committed to helping in establishing the protocols of some South American countries and in researching plasma machines for Somalia .
In addition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of people from civil society in a project called IppocrateOrg .
The Facebook page ( https : //www.facebook.com/IppocrateOrg/ ) is already active , while www.ippocrateorg.org will be active very soon .
This project has NO political ambition .
We have rejected the intrusions of representatives of various political groups .
Also , we have kindly refused aid and requests for collaboration from associations affiliated or linked to parties , because we were born as a group of citizens and health professionals whose sole objective is the defence of human health .
We want @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a voice to that part of the medical-scientific community that , in the Coronavirus affair , did not feel represented by the Health Institutions .
At the same time , we are committed to opposing all research or communications that aim to weaken access to appropriate medical therapies and that violate the human right to health and well-being .
Hydroxychloroquine therapy has found itself in the spotlight of the traditional mainstream press and has given rise to conflicting positions within the WHO , the Research Institutes and the Italian Medicines Agency ( AIFA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ history of this diatribe ?
DR. ADRIANA PRIVITERA : A little clarity is in order .
The use of chloroquine goes back a long way [ 1 ] During the Covid-19 outbreak , China and South Korea used hydroxychloroquine with or without macrolide association ( WangM et al .
Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibited the new coronavirus CellRes 2020 , 4 February [ 2 ] ) .
Some 20 in vitro studies conducted in China with excellent results recommend its use for the prevention and treatment of ongoing Covid-19 pneumonia .
( https @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a study conducted in France on 20 patients showed a lower persistence of the virus , particularly in combination with azithromycin ( https : //pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32205204/ ) .
Following these studies , the hydroxychloroquine-azithromycin combination was prescribed worldwide , even outside of authorized clinical trials .
In Italy , in April , the Italian Federation of Family Doctors ( FIMMG ) recommended its use in confirmed cases of Covid-19 and in suspected cases , so that many family doctors used the treatment early and were able to avoid hospital admissions .
On 26 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chloroquine to the list of drugs that can not be exported , given the growing body of evidence of its effectiveness .
In March , the AIFA issued a circular authorising the off-label use of hydroxychloroquine , warning against the simultaneous use of azithromycin following several studies demonstrating the danger of serious arrhythmias [ 3 ] .
3 ] But then the problems began [ 4 ] .
In May , Mandeep Mehra and his collaborators published in The Lancet an observational study of 96,032 hospitalized patients on 6 continents taking hydroxychloroquine and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The study concluded that there was evidence of serious arrhythmias in the treated group compared to the control group , high mortality and no therapeutic benefit of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine alone or in combination with macrolides ( https : //doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736 ( 20 ) 31180-6 ) .
On this basis , the WHO is terminating investigations and studies on hydroxychloroquine ; the AIFA on 29 May , is no longer granting off-label prescribing and is only allowing official trials to continue .
This creates a very serious situation because this therapy had been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the disease .
Fortunately , The Lancet study is being challenged by 120 researchers from around the world who are questioning both its data collection and methodology .
The Lancet withdrew the study and the WHO resumed testing of hydroxychloroquine on June 3 .
And we , with the signatures of 80 doctors , are writing to The Lancet magazine , highlighting the drug ’ s scientific merit .
Unfortunately , the AIFA is not backing down , maintaining the indication to use hydroxychloroquine to treat covid-19 only for hospital and home @ @ @ @ @ @ @ excluded from reimbursement and , more importantly , the doctor prescribing is personally liable for any side effects of the treatment .
A group of doctors is making a legal application to the AIFA to request that hydroxychloroquine be used again for the early treatment of the disease .
Finally , in June , the British trial RECOVERY ( www.recoverytrial.net/files/recovery-protocol-v6-0-202005-14.pdf ) , which used very high doses of the drug , found no difference in mortality between the treated and control groups after one month of treatment .
This study is also to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were recruited in hospitals in the United Kingdom , the dose of hydroxychloroquine is high and patients are treated as a monotherapy , whereas the effect of hydroxychloroquine is associated with that of macrolides , including in serious patients , some of them on ventilators .
As is now well known , hydroxychloroquine is the ideal treatment in the early or intermediate phase of the disease , avoiding its aggravation with known fatal complications .
Very useful is the explanation by Bologna ’ s Prof. Viale on the natural history of the disease @ @ @ @ @ @ @ phases ( https : //youtu.be/mVBfCzDWxPQ ) .
After RECOVERY , WHO blocked everything again .
Let ’ s not forget that Recovery receives funds from Oxford but also from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation .
According to the analysis of all the studies , there is to date NO SINGLE STUDY that demonstrates the dangerousness of the drug , when administered with the CORRECT indications .
It is therefore legitimate to ask in which direction scientific research is going .
What are you asking of the Italian government and medical institutions ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the epidemic with a reduction in contagion in almost all regions , intensive care services that are being emptied , and a steady decrease in deaths .
This has happened , in our opinion , due to three concomitant factors : 1 .
Containment was observed by citizens in a commendable manner , as well as hygienic-sanitary measures ( masks , social distance , hand hygiene , surfaces , etc. )
.
2 .
The use of good therapy , even if it is empirical and not systematic , with a wide @ @ @ @ @ @ @ initial phase of the infection and heparin as soon as the fatal mechanism of multi-organ thrombosis was discovered , which caused the precipitation of the patients ’ clinical state .
3 .
The climatic conditions of the hot season , which seem to be favourable to limit the contagion of this class of respiratory viruses .
In view of the above , in order not to run the risk of compromising the results obtained so far , we ask the Italian Government , but also the Regions , to inform the population about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the ban on the use of hydroxychloroquine , until yesterday the winning weapon of the initial therapy .
The loss of its use , in fact , to date , suggests that it was decided to leave patients completely uncovered from the point of view of inflammation , leaving the only action of the antiviral to the difficult task of preventing the ensuing cytokinic storm .
We also ask what type of antiviral molecule will be used , and the cost of a complete treatment of the Covid patient , in order to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ acceptable cost/benefit ratio .
If the epidemic resumes in Italy , what will be the intervention strategy in the territory ?
In the absence of the use of hydroxychloroquine as a drug of first immediate use in the territory , there will inevitably be a greater influx of patients in serious conditions to the health facilities : a script already seen and terrifying , especially in the RSA !
( nursing homes ) MARIA : I would like a serious and independent experimentation of Hydroxychloroquine to resume , which clearly , like all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the precautions that Adriana has already exposed in full , giving everyone correct and true information on statistical data and possible therapies .
Furthermore , I think it is important for us all to stop and think about the responsibilities of those who have managed the epidemic at the government level , the ISS ( the Health Service ) , the AIFA and the Regions , particularly Lombardy , by re-reading the whole process of information flows , reviewing the sequence of events from a general profile that includes the environment , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In short , a broad vision that links the whole process as a whole .
I would like to emphasise , with data and a timetable , that if the correct therapies had been implemented from the very first stage and throughout the territory , as well as prophylactic measures , with particular attention to the protection of health workers , the carnage and national locking of the economic crisis would have been avoided .
Not to mention the massacre of our elderly in old people ’ s homes !
Now that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ need for mass influenza vaccination is being declared , to the advantage of pharmaceutical companies , while the correlation between influenza vaccination and the severity of Covid-19 is becoming increasingly evident ( https : //www.facebook.com/Articolo71/photos/a.109803843911684/175394604019274/ ?
type=3 & theater ) .
In addition , we would like to know what scientific evidence justifies influenza vaccination of children aged six months to six years .
Please tell us !
We were projected into a surreal dimension where , next to the real danger of the virus , nobody knew anything ; famous virologists and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ country into anguish and panic , with serious harm to children , the elderly , the disabled and the mentally ill. Health care should be of good quality and free everywhere in the world : the Covid-19 report has shown how far we are from this goal .
In your opinion , what is the role of the big pharmaceutical companies in this area and what should we do as citizens ?
MASSIMO : Big Pharma ’ s influence distorts the real relevance of pathologies and their respective treatments , sometimes substantially altering @ @ @ @ @ @ @ problem , those invited to speak in public should be required to declare any links with companies in the sector .
The Covid 2019 pandemic has shown that doctors in the field can find effective ( and sustainable ! )
answers long before researchers can verify their validity .
The real strength lies in the ability to freely and rapidly exchange experiences and results .
We believe that the clinic should regain the value and dignity taken away from it by very expensive research .
Big Pharma ’ s research exploits the COVID @ @ @ @ @ @ @ then offering very expensive or non-existent drugs , when we already have a set of drugs that have shown great efficacy in both the early stages of the disease ( hydroxychloroquine , azithromycin , heparin ) and the more advanced stages ( hyperimmune plasma ) .
The very large philanthropic funds in the medical field should be managed exclusively and transparently by independent government bodies in order to avoid a harmful mix of economic interests , advertising information and health needs .
MARIA : Thank you Olivier for the question “ what should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shifts the focus on all of us , on our ability to understand and act , without delegating the reading of reality to experts , or presumed experts .
I believe it is a responsibility that we must assume in order to begin to reflect again on what has happened , critically and creatively .
We can , as citizens and as doctors , rediscover together the wisdom that is deeply innate in human beings to feel and coordinate knowledge in a way that is useful for the emergence of truth , not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a continuous becoming that reveals itself to those who observe reality without prejudice , without censorship and without interests to maintain .
Without the restoration of the critical spirit and freedom of expression of doctors , I fear that we will once again find ourselves in a dramatic situation in the face of another virus or in the face of the climatic and environmental emergency which is already putting us at a disadvantage at all levels .
MAURO : After the publication of the Marseille study , mentioned above , we wonder how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ protocol in their clinical practice in Italy , and we invite them to join our research to conduct a retrospective epidemiological study of treated cases together .
WRITE US TO THIS PROVISIONAL MAIL : ippocrateor @ gmail.com ( as soon as the Ippocrateorg.org site is active we will open another one – ER : it is active ) Medical request to AIFA for the reintroduction of Hydroxychloroquine in Covid 19 : https : //www.nursetimes.org/coronavirus-caos-hydroxychloroquine-140-medici-contro-laifa/90879 [ 1 ] Today in addition to the treatment of malaria , hydroxychloroquine is indicated both in adults and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , systemic lupus erythematosus juvenile idiopathic arthritis , with recommended precautions for : problems with the retina , cardiovascular pathologies , cardiomyopathies , insufficiency cardiac , QT interval prolongation , liver and kidney failure , deficiency of glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase [ 4 ] A retrospective study by New York University showed lengthening of the QT tract up to 500msec ( val nor QTc in men 0.44sec , in women 0.45 sec ) with risk of severe arrhythmias , it is therefore incredible that patients with kidney deficiency were included in the study @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the treatment with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin !
!
!
, it is spontaneous to wonder if such a study is ETHICAL In fact , an extension of the QT tract can determine a severe arrhythmia called torsade de pointes-type ventricular arrhythmia which easily degenerates into a ventricular fibrillation , deadly arrhythmia that can be resolved only with electrical defibrillation Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com

ER Editor: What is now clearly crystallizing is the entire plandemic having been orchestrated around, at minimum, the shutdown of the family doctor’s ability to treat their own patients, especially regarding chloroquine drugs. We published a very illuminating piece on this yesterday from France, which details government action to ensure that a) patients wouldn’t even see their family practitioner during the crisis, and b) those doctors wouldn’t be able to prescribe hydroxychloroquine, a a drug which has been freely available for decades pretty much everywhere. See Covid-19: France Has Deliberately Sidelined Its Family Doctors.
********
Overcoming Fear: The Way Of the Hippocratic Movement
Libre Penseur (Free Thinker)
This is how, on the occasion of the covid-19 health crisis, a movement of health professionals was born in Italy to put an end to media propaganda – through the corruption of Big Pharma – in order to offer the best treatments to patients in complete independence.
******
OLIVIER TURQUET for PRESSENZA
On many occasions during the Covid-19 pandemic, the question of possible treatments for the virus was raised and was very controversial.
.
At the initiative of Mauro Rango, an Italian with a passion for medicine who lives in Rodrigues (Republic of Mauritius), a study group was set up and formalized under the association IppocrateOrg. We are talking about it with Mauro, Maria, Adriana, Nicola and Massimo, founding members.
Mauro, can you summarize what happened?
Mauro: I live in the Republic of Mauritius, on Rodrigues Island, 600 km east of Mauritius, the furthest point of Africa in the Indian Ocean. I have always loved medicine, even though I am not a doctor. When the outbreak of the Covid-19 epidemic started, I started looking for possible therapies with doctor friends, which led me to the combination of azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine.
When the Coronavirus arrived in Italy and the first people started to die, I called my friend Dr. Alberto Palamidese, a pulmonologist, now retired. He confirmed to me (early March) that the target organ of the virus was the lung and that there was interstitial pneumonia similar to Mycoplasma Pneumoniae which, if not treated immediately, resulted in the death of the patient. He told me that in his time, the treatment included high-dose azithromycin cortisone, low molecular weight heparin, and the use of hyperimmune plasma.
During the first ten days of March, I phoned a very dear doctor friend of mine in the prevention department of USL-2 Umbria who told me that they treat all patients at the first symptoms with hydroxychloroquine 400 mg/day x 7 days and azithromycin 500 mg/day x 6 days at home. With the exception of a few very rare hospitalizations, all cases were resolved within a week. Zero deaths (including those in hospital). Zero side effects.
At the same time, I learned that the local health authorities in Mauritius were stockpiling hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. I made enquiries with the authorities and, when the epidemic arrived, the plan (which would then be announced by the Prime Minister) was as follows: hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, the same dosages as those used in Umbria and, for the most serious cases, hyperimmune plasma.
The same therapy was previously used in South Korea and eradicated the epidemic fairly quickly.
So I discovered that all my research always leads to the same result.
I started writing long e-mails to several newspapers explaining that the therapy existed, while in my home region, Veneto, former compatriots and friends were going to the hospital to die without any therapy, receiving only oxygen. Then the carnage began in Lombardy. I continued to write without anyone listening.
On 17 March, a document from AIFA (Italian Medicines Agency) authorised the off-label use of hydroxychloroquine, but also warned against simultaneous use with azithromycin due to the lengthening of the QT curve and possible cardiac arrest for serious arrhythmias.
The circular of the federation of family doctors then recommends the use of hydroxychloroquine in the home, but few people, especially in northern Italy, use it in combination with azithromycin. Even in many large hospitals, such as Tor Vergata in Rome or Cutugno in Naples, azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine have been used in combination since mid-March.
Then, finally, in mid-April, azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine therapy was considered by the hospitals of Lombardy and Veneto, but still not in a systematic way because many were trying, on the advice of virologists, immunologists and epidemiologists, antiviral treatment which had little effect.
In Piacenza, Professor Cavanna Primario Ospedaliero treated patients at home with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin without death or side effects.
In Germany, the extensive use of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and a large amount of hyperimmune plasma kept the mortality rate below 3%. But in great silence, as the Germans know how to do.
I suffered a great deal when I saw my compatriots die, and the anger increased when I saw that the information in the media was occupied by laboratory doctors, experts of all kinds and statisticians and not by clinical doctors, particularly pneumologists, who could have treated the disease. There was total confusion, and no one at the top was in charge of establishing the rules of treatment to be followed both at the territorial and hospital levels. Each region, each hospital, but also each department and each general practitioner followed its own line of therapy.
I believe that another reason for these contradictions and the confusion that has led to catastrophic consequences is that part of the medical community has continued to follow the known path of validating scientific research, which is very time-consuming. This attitude of waiting, in the hope of identifying a drug validated at all levels, has been confronted by another part of the medical community, more accustomed to filtering research results through the lens of personal clinical experience, of having cured patients based on the validation of the “field result”.
The clinical intuition of doctors, validated by obvious results, still seems to find no echo in the current scientific medical community. The clinical experience proven by the healing records of many cases treated without any side effects seems to be less significant than a randomized study.
I would like to recall here the recent retrospective work of the Marseille group, which proved the validity of the protocol with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin on more than 3,700 Covid-19 patients. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477893920302817).
On May 5th, I receive a whatsapp message from a friend in Milan. He tells me about the intervention in a TV program led by F. Fazio of Roberto Burioni, a virologist who is trying to stop the initiative of some doctors using hyperimmune plasma. A huge wave of anger made me write my first whatsapp message on the subject. I sent it to about 40 friends with a request to spread it to friends.
Since that day, my life has changed.
I’ve received thousands of whatsapp messages and thousands of emails. Among the people who contacted me were also many doctors. Many of them had made the same attempts as I had by pointing out that the cure already existed. Immediately a group of serving and retired hospital doctors, local doctors and also nurses was formed to inform everyone about the therapeutic possibilities. But also by thousands of citizens from different professions.
Who’s in the group right now and what do you do?
The group began as a convergence of people with different professional skills and ideas, who found themselves wondering what could be done to find a cure for the coronavirus. The first thing we wanted to do was to review how things were working in practice.
In summary, since the beginning of March in the big hospitals in Rome, Neapolitana, Sardinia and Sicily, but certainly also in other realities that we do not know, hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin therapy has been used as the basic medicine that is still present. Secondly, the different protocols between hospitals and between departments within the same hospital (which shows the total absence of a director). Some added vitamin C, cortisone, heparin, various antivirals and heparin, vitamin A, with the basic nucleus remaining of azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine. In these hospitals, where the protocols contained the above-mentioned drugs, mortality was considerably reduced, even for those over 80 years of age with more pathologies. Meanwhile, however, in the hospitals of Lombardy and Veneto, the number of deaths increased enormously, reaching a record mortality rate of 17% in Lombardy.
My Youtube video on the 30,000 lives that could have been saved, after being viewed 9,000 times, has been deleted. In response to our objection, Youtube responded instantly with a clearly automatic, pre-packaged message indicating that the content was inappropriate.
With this group of doctors, and in dialogue with the coordinator of another group of territorial doctors who had widely used hydroxychloroquine with their patients, we carried out several initiatives, without giving them too much publicity, including :
1. With the help of a cardiologist (Dr. Adriana Privitera) and in order to dismantle the study published by The Lancet (which led to the WHO decision to withdraw hydroxychloroquine from the trials and the suspension by the AIFA of the use of this drug without authorization), I personally sent a letter to The Lancet and the WHO, signed by about eighty Italian doctors. Unlike The Guardian and the 120 scientists (https://zenodo.org/record/3862789#.XvikvV9xfIX) who attacked the study from a methodological point of view, we have shown that the deaths mentioned in the study occurred for two reasons:
a. Inclusion of patients whose disease is too advanced
b. Use of hydroxychloroquine in heart patients (ischemic, decompensated and arrhythmic) who should not have taken it. The study counted these deaths as a direct cause of the effects of the drug in question, and concluded that hydroxychloroquine was ineffective and dangerous, increasing mortality and arrhythmias. These conclusions were shown to be medically and scientifically unreliable.
2. We wrote a letter to the President of the Republic, Mattarella, to explain the absurd position of AIFA asking him to intervene.
We are now committed to helping in establishing the protocols of some South American countries and in researching plasma machines for Somalia.
In addition to doctors, we have involved thousands of people from civil society in a project called IppocrateOrg. The Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/IppocrateOrg/) is already active, while www.ippocrateorg.org will be active very soon. (ER: it is.)
This project has NO political ambition. We have rejected the intrusions of representatives of various political groups. Also, we have kindly refused aid and requests for collaboration from associations affiliated or linked to parties, because we were born as a group of citizens and health professionals whose sole objective is the defence of human health. We want to develop a movement that can give a voice to that part of the medical-scientific community that, in the Coronavirus affair, did not feel represented by the Health Institutions. At the same time, we are committed to opposing all research or communications that aim to weaken access to appropriate medical therapies and that violate the human right to health and well-being.
Hydroxychloroquine therapy has found itself in the spotlight of the traditional mainstream press and has given rise to conflicting positions within the WHO, the Research Institutes and the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA): Can you briefly summarise the history of this diatribe?
DR. ADRIANA PRIVITERA: A little clarity is in order. The use of chloroquine goes back a long way [1] During the Covid-19 outbreak, China and South Korea used hydroxychloroquine with or without macrolide association (WangM et al. Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibited the new coronavirus CellRes 2020, 4 February [2]).
Some 20 in vitro studies conducted in China with excellent results recommend its use for the prevention and treatment of ongoing Covid-19 pneumonia. (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32075365/). In March 2020, a study conducted in France on 20 patients showed a lower persistence of the virus, particularly in combination with azithromycin (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32205204/).
Following these studies, the hydroxychloroquine-azithromycin combination was prescribed worldwide, even outside of authorized clinical trials. In Italy, in April, the Italian Federation of Family Doctors (FIMMG) recommended its use in confirmed cases of Covid-19 and in suspected cases, so that many family doctors used the treatment early and were able to avoid hospital admissions.
On 26 February 2020, the UK government added chloroquine to the list of drugs that cannot be exported, given the growing body of evidence of its effectiveness. In March, the AIFA issued a circular authorising the off-label use of hydroxychloroquine, warning against the simultaneous use of azithromycin following several studies demonstrating the danger of serious arrhythmias [3]. 3]
But then the problems began [4].
In May, Mandeep Mehra and his collaborators published in The Lancet an observational study of 96,032 hospitalized patients on 6 continents taking hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine alone or in combination with macrolides. The study concluded that there was evidence of serious arrhythmias in the treated group compared to the control group, high mortality and no therapeutic benefit of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine alone or in combination with macrolides (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31180-6).
On this basis, the WHO is terminating investigations and studies on hydroxychloroquine; the AIFA on 29 May, is no longer granting off-label prescribing and is only allowing official trials to continue. This creates a very serious situation because this therapy had been very useful in treating the first phase of the disease.
Fortunately, The Lancet study is being challenged by 120 researchers from around the world who are questioning both its data collection and methodology. The Lancet withdrew the study and the WHO resumed testing of hydroxychloroquine on June 3.
And we, with the signatures of 80 doctors, are writing to The Lancet magazine, highlighting the drug’s scientific merit. Unfortunately, the AIFA is not backing down, maintaining the indication to use hydroxychloroquine to treat covid-19 only for hospital and home clinical trials. The prescription is therefore excluded from reimbursement and, more importantly, the doctor prescribing is personally liable for any side effects of the treatment. A group of doctors is making a legal application to the AIFA to request that hydroxychloroquine be used again for the early treatment of the disease.
Finally, in June, the British trial RECOVERY (www.recoverytrial.net/files/recovery-protocol-v6-0-202005-14.pdf), which used very high doses of the drug, found no difference in mortality between the treated and control groups after one month of treatment. This study is also to be criticized because more than 10,000 patients were recruited in hospitals in the United Kingdom, the dose of hydroxychloroquine is high and patients are treated as a monotherapy, whereas the effect of hydroxychloroquine is associated with that of macrolides, including in serious patients, some of them on ventilators.
As is now well known, hydroxychloroquine is the ideal treatment in the early or intermediate phase of the disease, avoiding its aggravation with known fatal complications. Very useful is the explanation by Bologna’s Prof. Viale on the natural history of the disease and the therapeutic interventions in the different phases (https://youtu.be/mVBfCzDWxPQ).
After RECOVERY, WHO blocked everything again. Let’s not forget that Recovery receives funds from Oxford but also from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
According to the analysis of all the studies, there is to date NO SINGLE STUDY that demonstrates the dangerousness of the drug, when administered with the CORRECT indications. It is therefore legitimate to ask in which direction scientific research is going.
What are you asking of the Italian government and medical institutions?
NICOLA: Italy has entered phase 2 of the epidemic with a reduction in contagion in almost all regions, intensive care services that are being emptied, and a steady decrease in deaths. This has happened, in our opinion, due to three concomitant factors:
1. Containment was observed by citizens in a commendable manner, as well as hygienic-sanitary measures (masks, social distance, hand hygiene, surfaces, etc.).
2. The use of good therapy, even if it is empirical and not systematic, with a wide use in particular of hydroxychloroquine in the initial phase of the infection and heparin as soon as the fatal mechanism of multi-organ thrombosis was discovered, which caused the precipitation of the patients’ clinical state.
3. The climatic conditions of the hot season, which seem to be favourable to limit the contagion of this class of respiratory viruses.
In view of the above, in order not to run the risk of compromising the results obtained so far, we ask the Italian Government, but also the Regions, to inform the population about the therapy that will be implemented after the ban on the use of hydroxychloroquine, until yesterday the winning weapon of the initial therapy. The loss of its use, in fact, to date, suggests that it was decided to leave patients completely uncovered from the point of view of inflammation, leaving the only action of the antiviral to the difficult task of preventing the ensuing cytokinic storm. We also ask what type of antiviral molecule will be used, and the cost of a complete treatment of the Covid patient, in order to assess whether there is a correct and acceptable cost/benefit ratio. If the epidemic resumes in Italy, what will be the intervention strategy in the territory?
In the absence of the use of hydroxychloroquine as a drug of first immediate use in the territory, there will inevitably be a greater influx of patients in serious conditions to the health facilities: a script already seen and terrifying, especially in the RSA! (nursing homes)
MARIA: I would like a serious and independent experimentation of Hydroxychloroquine to resume, which clearly, like all drugs, must be used wisely and with the precautions that Adriana has already exposed in full, giving everyone correct and true information on statistical data and possible therapies.
Furthermore, I think it is important for us all to stop and think about the responsibilities of those who have managed the epidemic at the government level, the ISS (the Health Service), the AIFA and the Regions, particularly Lombardy, by re-reading the whole process of information flows, reviewing the sequence of events from a general profile that includes the environment, prevention, awareness and citizens’ freedom. In short, a broad vision that links the whole process as a whole.
I would like to emphasise, with data and a timetable, that if the correct therapies had been implemented from the very first stage and throughout the territory, as well as prophylactic measures, with particular attention to the protection of health workers, the carnage and national locking of the economic crisis would have been avoided. Not to mention the massacre of our elderly in old people’s homes!
Now that the epidemic is almost over, the need for mass influenza vaccination is being declared, to the advantage of pharmaceutical companies, while the correlation between influenza vaccination and the severity of Covid-19 is becoming increasingly evident (https://www.facebook.com/Articolo71/photos/a.109803843911684/175394604019274/?type=3&theater).
In addition, we would like to know what scientific evidence justifies influenza vaccination of children aged six months to six years. Please tell us!
We were projected into a surreal dimension where, next to the real danger of the virus, nobody knew anything; famous virologists and politicians pretended to know, plunging the country into anguish and panic, with serious harm to children, the elderly, the disabled and the mentally ill.
Health care should be of good quality and free everywhere in the world: the Covid-19 report has shown how far we are from this goal. In your opinion, what is the role of the big pharmaceutical companies in this area and what should we do as citizens?
MASSIMO: Big Pharma’s influence distorts the real relevance of pathologies and their respective treatments, sometimes substantially altering public information.
To overcome this important problem, those invited to speak in public should be required to declare any links with companies in the sector.
The Covid 2019 pandemic has shown that doctors in the field can find effective (and sustainable!) answers long before researchers can verify their validity. The real strength lies in the ability to freely and rapidly exchange experiences and results. We believe that the clinic should regain the value and dignity taken away from it by very expensive research.
Big Pharma’s research exploits the COVID case by investing billions of dollars and then offering very expensive or non-existent drugs, when we already have a set of drugs that have shown great efficacy in both the early stages of the disease (hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, heparin) and the more advanced stages (hyperimmune plasma).
The very large philanthropic funds in the medical field should be managed exclusively and transparently by independent government bodies in order to avoid a harmful mix of economic interests, advertising information and health needs.
MARIA: Thank you Olivier for the question “what should we do as citizens” because it shifts the focus on all of us, on our ability to understand and act, without delegating the reading of reality to experts, or presumed experts. I believe it is a responsibility that we must assume in order to begin to reflect again on what has happened, critically and creatively. We can, as citizens and as doctors, rediscover together the wisdom that is deeply innate in human beings to feel and coordinate knowledge in a way that is useful for the emergence of truth, not understood dogmatically and statically, but as a continuous becoming that reveals itself to those who observe reality without prejudice, without censorship and without interests to maintain.
Without the restoration of the critical spirit and freedom of expression of doctors, I fear that we will once again find ourselves in a dramatic situation in the face of another virus or in the face of the climatic and environmental emergency which is already putting us at a disadvantage at all levels.
MAURO: After the publication of the Marseille study, mentioned above, we wonder how many doctors have experimented with the hydroxychloroquine-azithromycin protocol in their clinical practice in Italy, and we invite them to join our research to conduct a retrospective epidemiological study of treated cases together.
************
WRITE US TO THIS PROVISIONAL MAIL: [email protected] (as soon as the Ippocrateorg.org site is active we will open another one – ER: it is active)
More information:
www.ippocrateorg.org;
Medical request to AIFA for the reintroduction of Hydroxychloroquine in Covid 19: https://www.nursetimes.org/coronavirus-caos-hydroxychloroquine-140-medici-contro-laifa/90879
Letter to Lancet
All videos by Mauro Rango:
[1] Today in addition to the treatment of malaria, hydroxychloroquine is indicated both in adults and in children in case of rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus juvenile idiopathic arthritis, with recommended precautions for: problems with the retina, cardiovascular pathologies, cardiomyopathies, insufficiency cardiac, QT interval prolongation, liver and kidney failure, deficiency of glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase
[3] In 2015, 33 Chinese studies found this hazard (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26564594/
[4] A retrospective study by New York University showed lengthening of the QT tract up to 500msec (val nor QTc in men 0.44sec, in women 0.45 sec) with risk of severe arrhythmias, it is therefore incredible that patients with kidney deficiency were included in the study and simultaneous intake of Amiodarone contraindicated in the treatment with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin !!!, it is spontaneous to wonder if such a study is ETHICAL In fact, an extension of the QT tract can determine a severe arrhythmia called torsade de pointes-type ventricular arrhythmia which easily degenerates into a ventricular fibrillation, deadly arrhythmia that can be resolved only with electrical defibrillation
************
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.