thelibertybeacon--2020-11-06--Is ‘Ballotgate’ the Single Greatest Crime in Modern U.S. History?

Is Ballotgate the Single Greatest Crime in Modern American History ?
Imagine , for a moment , that the night of November 3rd , 2020 , had gone a bit differently , with the circumstances reversed .
Imagine that the media was champing at the bit to call several states early for Trump , while refusing to call those states in which Biden was comfortably winning , giving the false perception of the comfortable lead that had been suggested by months of Trump ’ s leading the polls .
Then , imagine it had become clear that Joe Biden was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ closely contested swing states .
Now imagine that , after having stopped the counting of legal ballots in those states ( due to the lateness of the hour and logistical challenges , we are told ) , hundreds of thousands of ballots mysteriously appeared in these states , and counted behind the curtain , with limited Democrat oversight , thus shifting the tide in Trump ’ s favor by the next day .
You don ’ t have to ponder that scenario long before concluding that the Democrats and the media would be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is illegitimate , and calling for investigations at the highest levels to audit the results , ensuring that each and every vote was verified as having been legally cast , with appropriate registration , postmark dates , signatures , etc .
I don ’ t think it ’ s possible to understate the following assertion : If it is proven that Democratic Party operatives illegally introduced hundreds of thousands of illegitimate ballots in order to swing an election in their Party ’ s favor , it will have been the single most dangerous @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are we talking about here , after all ?
We aren ’ t just talking about the oftentimes phantom “ voter suppression ” that Democrats notoriously peddle , suggesting that requiring a photo ID or having to stand in line to vote amounts to it .
No , we are talking about disenfranchisement of the purest form , and the dissolution of trust in the most fundamental institution of the American republic .
In an almost prophetic moment after states stopped counting votes in key battleground states where he had a significant lead @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all voting to stop .
We don ’ t want to find any ballots at 4 A.M. in the morning.
” As expected , the Biden team , enjoying complete and total mainstream media support ( interestingly , finding Fox News to be its most steadfast ally in this election ) , immediately began to lie and spin , suggesting that Trump was trying to “ shut down the counting of duly cast ballots.
” That is , in fact , the precise opposite of what Trump said .
Trump wanted these states @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been duly cast .
He said that voting must stop , since the polls had closed , and he did not want any ballots that were “ unduly ” cast to mysteriously appear .
The examples of this happening are too numerous to list here .
But for the sake of time , we ’ ll limit this discussion to Michigan , where , indeed , hundreds of thousands of new votes appeared overnight , overwhelmingly votes for Biden .
As poll watcher and attorney Kelly SoRelle reports from Detroit , three vehicles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ at least 130,000 ballots ” which “ were not delivered to the precinct before the cut off time ” and that “ literally 100 % of those ballots ” were votes for Biden .
Amidst all of these allegations , rather than ramping up transparency , efforts have been made to limit access for GOP observers to the process .
Nonetheless , there are several reports of ballots being counted despite having no names on them .
James O ’ Keefe has released video of a whistleblower who reports that U.S. postal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ back-date late mail-in ballots as received November 3rd , 2020 , so they are accepted.
” There are so many crimes suspected to have occurred here that the severity of each of them may be lost in the deluge .
But I can not help thinking about this in the appropriate context , despite the media efforts to downplay the high-level political crimes that are being alleged .
I think about this as it directly relates to the everyday American .
My wife and I , for example , aren ’ t anybody @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you .
We ’ re just regular Americans who work hard to provide for our families and raise our children to be good and productive citizens of this free nation , where our lives and liberty are protected as we pursue our own individual happiness .
You know , what we used to call the American Dream .
We do not riot in the streets to effect the change we want .
We vote .
And because we want the American Dream rather than promises of a socialist utopia administrated by government bureaucrats @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if you are a Trump voter living in Michigan , the Democratic leadership of your state , if the above allegations are true , disenfranchised you and at least 129,999 of your political allies that supported the presidential candidate of your choosing .
Here ’ s another question worth pondering .
Did you also vote for Republican Senate candidate John James , who also saw his lead disappear after these thousands of new ballots were introduced under the shroud of darkness ?
At 3 A.M. , James was up by about 60,000 votes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democratic incumbent had secured the votes needed to represent Michigan in the Senate .
There may be reasonable explanations for all of this .
But to say that it isn ’ t a suspicious set of circumstances suggesting potential corruption can only be a lie , and , again , if the roles were reversed , the media and Democrats would be sparing no time or digital ink in screaming for a fair and thorough investigation .
And that ’ s all that we Trump supporters and Republicans now demand — a fair @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This is not just about Michiganders , to be clear .
This crime , if it is proven to be a crime , would have the potential to swindle every American people of their rightfully-elected president , in accordance with the United States Constitution , and possibly shifted the balance of power in Congress .
It would be nothing short of a conspiracy to destroy America .
Trump won Michigan by a slim margin of just over ten thousand votes in 2016 .
If Democratic operatives , colluding with the media and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Service , conspired to introduce hundreds of thousands of illegitimate votes in battleground states like Michigan , it is quite possibly most dangerous crime in modern American history , and the word “ sedition ” does not seem too strong a word to describe it .
The objective moral chasm between such a crime and Watergate is as vast as the space between mass murder and jaywalking .
Time and evidence will tell , you may be assured .
President Trump has beaten back the many other attempted coups that the Democrats and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over these past four years , and if you think he ’ ll do any less than exploring every nook and cranny for the potential evidence of a crime of this magnitude , you haven ’ t been paying attention .

Is Ballotgate the Single Greatest Crime in Modern American History?
By: William Sullivan
Imagine, for a moment, that the night of November 3rd, 2020, had gone a bit differently, with the circumstances reversed.
Imagine that the media was champing at the bit to call several states early for Trump, while refusing to call those states in which Biden was comfortably winning, giving the false perception of the comfortable lead that had been suggested by months of Trump’s leading the polls. Then, imagine it had become clear that Joe Biden was surging to a comfortable lead in several closely contested swing states. Now imagine that, after having stopped the counting of legal ballots in those states (due to the lateness of the hour and logistical challenges, we are told), hundreds of thousands of ballots mysteriously appeared in these states, and counted behind the curtain, with limited Democrat oversight, thus shifting the tide in Trump’s favor by the next day.
You don’t have to ponder that scenario long before concluding that the Democrats and the media would be claiming that the outcome of that election is illegitimate, and calling for investigations at the highest levels to audit the results, ensuring that each and every vote was verified as having been legally cast, with appropriate registration, postmark dates, signatures, etc.
I don’t think it’s possible to understate the following assertion: If it is proven that Democratic Party operatives illegally introduced hundreds of thousands of illegitimate ballots in order to swing an election in their Party’s favor, it will have been the single most dangerous crime in modern American history.
What are we talking about here, after all? We aren’t just talking about the oftentimes phantom “voter suppression” that Democrats notoriously peddle, suggesting that requiring a photo ID or having to stand in line to vote amounts to it. No, we are talking about disenfranchisement of the purest form, and the dissolution of trust in the most fundamental institution of the American republic.
In an almost prophetic moment after states stopped counting votes in key battleground states where he had a significant lead, Trump proclaimed: “We want all voting to stop. We don’t want to find any ballots at 4 A.M. in the morning.”
As expected, the Biden team, enjoying complete and total mainstream media support (interestingly, finding Fox News to be its most steadfast ally in this election), immediately began to lie and spin, suggesting that Trump was trying to “shut down the counting of duly cast ballots.”
That is, in fact, the precise opposite of what Trump said. Trump wanted these states to continue counting the votes that had been duly cast. He said that voting must stop, since the polls had closed, and he did not want any ballots that were “unduly” cast to mysteriously appear.
The examples of this happening are too numerous to list here. But for the sake of time, we’ll limit this discussion to Michigan, where, indeed, hundreds of thousands of new votes appeared overnight, overwhelmingly votes for Biden. As poll watcher and attorney Kelly SoRelle reports from Detroit, three vehicles arrived at around 4 A.M., with “at least 130,000 ballots” which “were not delivered to the precinct before the cut off time” and that “literally 100% of those ballots” were votes for Biden. Amidst all of these allegations, rather than ramping up transparency, efforts have been made to limit access for GOP observers to the process. Nonetheless, there are several reports of ballots being counted despite having no names on them. James O’Keefe has released video of a whistleblower who reports that U.S. postal workers in Michigan were issued directives to back-date late mail-in ballots as received November 3rd, 2020, so they are accepted.”
There are so many crimes suspected to have occurred here that the severity of each of them may be lost in the deluge. But I cannot help thinking about this in the appropriate context, despite the media efforts to downplay the high-level political crimes that are being alleged.
I think about this as it directly relates to the everyday American. My wife and I, for example, aren’t anybody special. Chances are, neither are you. We’re just regular Americans who work hard to provide for our families and raise our children to be good and productive citizens of this free nation, where our lives and liberty are protected as we pursue our own individual happiness. You know, what we used to call the American Dream.
We do not riot in the streets to effect the change we want. We vote. And because we want the American Dream rather than promises of a socialist utopia administrated by government bureaucrats, we voted for Trump.
And if you are a Trump voter living in Michigan, the Democratic leadership of your state, if the above allegations are true, disenfranchised you and at least 129,999 of your political allies that supported the presidential candidate of your choosing.
Here’s another question worth pondering. Did you also vote for Republican Senate candidate John James, who also saw his lead disappear after these thousands of new ballots were introduced under the shroud of darkness? At 3 A.M., James was up by about 60,000 votes. By the following day, the Democratic incumbent had secured the votes needed to represent Michigan in the Senate.
There may be reasonable explanations for all of this. But to say that it isn’t a suspicious set of circumstances suggesting potential corruption can only be a lie, and, again, if the roles were reversed, the media and Democrats would be sparing no time or digital ink in screaming for a fair and thorough investigation.
And that’s all that we Trump supporters and Republicans now demand — a fair and thorough investigation to discern the truth.
This is not just about Michiganders, to be clear. This crime, if it is proven to be a crime, would have the potential to swindle every American people of their rightfully-elected president, in accordance with the United States Constitution, and possibly shifted the balance of power in Congress. It would be nothing short of a conspiracy to destroy America.
Trump won Michigan by a slim margin of just over ten thousand votes in 2016. If Democratic operatives, colluding with the media and the leadership of the United States Postal Service, conspired to introduce hundreds of thousands of illegitimate votes in battleground states like Michigan, it is quite possibly most dangerous crime in modern American history, and the word “sedition” does not seem too strong a word to describe it. The objective moral chasm between such a crime and Watergate is as vast as the space between mass murder and jaywalking.
Time and evidence will tell, you may be assured. President Trump has beaten back the many other attempted coups that the Democrats and media have foisted upon the American people over these past four years, and if you think he’ll do any less than exploring every nook and cranny for the potential evidence of a crime of this magnitude, you haven’t been paying attention.
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-06--U.S. Right to Know Sues NIH for Documents Concerning Origins of SARS-CoV-2

U.S .
Right to Know , an investigative public health nonprofit group , filed a lawsuit Thursday against the National Institutes of Health ( NIH ) for violating provisions of the Freedom of Information Act .
The lawsuit , filed in U.S. District Court in Washington , DC , seeks correspondence with or about organizations such as the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention , as well as the EcoHealth Alliance , which partnered with and funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology .
U.S .
Right to Know said that today ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one part of the organization ’ s efforts to try to uncover what is known about the origins of SARS-CoV-2 , and the risks of biosafety labs and gain-of-function research , which seeks to augment the infectivity or lethality of potential pandemic pathogens .
Since July , U.S .
Right to Know has filed 36 state , federal and international public records requests about these subjects .
“ Preventing the next pandemic may depend crucially on understanding the origins of the present one , ” said Gary Ruskin , executive director of U.S @ @ @ @ @ @ @ want to know whether the U.S. or Chinese governments , or scientists affiliated with them , are concealing data about the origins of SARS-CoV-2 , or the risks of biosafety labs and gain-of-function research.
” NIH denied the organization ’ s FOIA request and determined to “ withhold those records pursuant to Exemption 7 ( A ) , 5 U.S.C .
§ 552 , and section 5.31 ( g ) ( l ) of the HHS FOIA Regulations , 45 CFR Part 5 .
Exemption 7 ( A ) permits the withholding of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when disclosure could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings.
” For more information about our investigation , see our post on “ Why we are researching the origins of SARS-CoV-2 , biosafety labs and GOF research ” and our reading list on “ What are the origins of SARS-CoV-2 ?
What are the risks of gain-of-function research ?
” U.S .
Right to Know is an investigative research group focused on promoting transparency for public health .
For more information , see our website at usrtk.org .

U.S. Right to Know, an investigative public health nonprofit group, filed a lawsuit Thursday against the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for violating provisions of the Freedom of Information Act.
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, DC, seeks correspondence with or about organizations such as the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, as well as the EcoHealth Alliance, which partnered with and funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
U.S. Right to Know said that today’s litigation’s against the NIH is one part of the organization’s efforts to try to uncover what is known about the origins of SARS-CoV-2, and the risks of biosafety labs and gain-of-function research, which seeks to augment the infectivity or lethality of potential pandemic pathogens. Since July, U.S. Right to Know has filed 36 state, federal and international public records requests about these subjects.
“Preventing the next pandemic may depend crucially on understanding the origins of the present one,” said Gary Ruskin, executive director of U.S. Right to Know. “We want to know whether the U.S. or Chinese governments, or scientists affiliated with them, are concealing data about the origins of SARS-CoV-2, or the risks of biosafety labs and gain-of-function research.”
NIH denied the organization’s FOIA request and determined to “withhold those records pursuant to Exemption 7(A), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and section 5.31 (g)(l) of the HHS FOIA Regulations, 45 CFR Part 5. Exemption 7(A) permits the withholding of investigatory records compiled for law enforcement purposes when disclosure could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings.”
For more information about our investigation, see our post on “Why we are researching the origins of SARS-CoV-2, biosafety labs and GOF research” and our reading list on “What are the origins of SARS-CoV-2? What are the risks of gain-of-function research?”
U.S. Right to Know is an investigative research group focused on promoting transparency for public health. For more information, see our website at usrtk.org.
••••
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-06--Democrats Livid In Leaked Caucus Call After Crushing Nov 3rd Losses

House Democrats were livid during a Thursday caucus call after the so-called ‘ blue wave ’ they were promised by pollster evaporated , and they lost several seats , according to leaked excerpts .
Virginia Rep. Abigail Spanberger was reportedly the most vocal – reportedly complaining that “ we lost races we shouldn ’ t have lost .
Defund police almost cost me my race because of an attack ad .
Don ’ t say socialism ever again , ” yelling that the party needs to “ get back to basics.
” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi reportedly interjected – saying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the presidency.
” According to The Hill , centrist Democrats are now talking about throwing their support behind a challenger to Pelosi , with two prominent Democrats telling the outlet that they are reaching out to their colleagues about backing Hakeem Jeffries ( Pictured ) ( D-NY ) to take Pelosi ’ s place .
“ He ’ s the only one prepared and positioned ” to become speaker , one of them said .
” He bridges moderates and progressives better than anyone .
And most importantly , he ’ s not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ down ’ the idea , saying that he ’ s focused on keeping his spot as one of Pelosi ’ s top lieutenants .
Heading into the polls , Pelosi enjoyed the overwhelming support of her caucus — facing no threat of a Speakership challenge — and Democratic leaders were eyeing big gains to their majority , with some estimates in the double digits .
But the early returns revealed a different reality : Not only did Democrats lose a number of their most vulnerable members , they had not picked off a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The results immediately emboldened Republican leaders , who accused Pelosi and her party of being out of touch with the country .
And Democrats on and off of Capitol Hill were left licking their wounds and questioning the strategic decisions that guided their party ’ s message throughout the campaign .
“ Pelosi needed to hammer Trump but instead she chose to let him slide , ” said one former senior Democratic aide .
“ Last night should have been a bloodbath for Republicans.
” –The Hill Perhaps Democrats should have mentioned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ impeachment – even once during the election .
Instead they mysteriously swept it under the rug .
( TLB ) published this article from ZeroHedge as compiled by Tyler Durden This Is Why Nancy Pelosi Is Backing The Hard Left The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Democrats Livid In Leaked Caucus Call After Crushing Election Losses
“We’ll Get Fu*king Torn Apart Again In 2022”
ZH
House Democrats were livid during a Thursday caucus call after the so-called ‘blue wave’ they were promised by pollster evaporated, and they lost several seats, according to leaked excerpts.
(CAROLINE BREHMAN/CQ-ROLL CALL/GETTY IMAGES)
According to AP‘s Erica Werner:
Virginia Rep. Abigail Spanberger was reportedly the most vocal – reportedly complaining that “we lost races we shouldn’t have lost. Defund police almost cost me my race because of an attack ad. Don’t say socialism ever again,” yelling that the party needs to “get back to basics.”
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi reportedly interjected – saying that they “won the House and the presidency.”
Photo: Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call via AP
According to The Hill, centrist Democrats are now talking about throwing their support behind a challenger to Pelosi, with two prominent Democrats telling the outlet that they are reaching out to their colleagues about backing Hakeem Jeffries (Pictured) (D-NY) to take Pelosi’s place.
“He’s the only one prepared and positioned” to become speaker, one of them said. ” He bridges moderates and progressives better than anyone. And most importantly, he’s not Nancy Pelosi.”
Jeffries immediately ‘shot down’ the idea, saying that he’s focused on keeping his spot as one of Pelosi’s top lieutenants.
Heading into the polls, Pelosi enjoyed the overwhelming support of her caucus — facing no threat of a Speakership challenge — and Democratic leaders were eyeing big gains to their majority, with some estimates in the double digits. But the early returns revealed a different reality: Not only did Democrats lose a number of their most vulnerable members, they had not picked off a single Republican incumbent heading into Wednesday evening. The results immediately emboldened Republican leaders, who accused Pelosi and her party of being out of touch with the country. And Democrats on and off of Capitol Hill were left licking their wounds and questioning the strategic decisions that guided their party’s message throughout the campaign. “Pelosi needed to hammer Trump but instead she chose to let him slide,” said one former senior Democratic aide. “Last night should have been a bloodbath for Republicans.” –The Hill
Perhaps Democrats should have mentioned their crowning achievement – Trump’s impeachment – even once during the election. Instead they mysteriously swept it under the rug.
*********
(TLB) published this article from ZeroHedge as compiled by Tyler Durden
Photo content added by (TLB)
Related from The Liberty Beacon:
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-06--‘No Evidence’ of Coronavirus Found on London Tubes and Buses Teeming with People

ER Editor : We ’ re not sure of the point of this story , with players like Imperial College ( home of the infamous , very wrong , doom-and-gloom merchant Neil Ferguson ) and Sadiq Khan ( globalist mayor of London ) behind it .
Is it the result of a fear campaign that ’ s been too successful such that many fewer people are using London public transport than the govt would like ?
Is it proof of a government ‘ caring ’ by disinfecting so much that it ’ s all ‘ healthy ’ ?
None of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ masses that use public transport every day , such as the Underground , will put out many bacteria and viruses daily before it can get a thorough cleaning at night , if indeed such is the case .
And given the much-publicized evidence that masks don ’ t work for miniscule virus particles … On face value it provokes the question , why the second lockdown if so many people can safely co-exist when packed like sardines for perhaps up to 30 minutes at a time on long journeys ?
We need to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ very own words below , that in general ‘ surface contact is not the main issue ’ for the transmission of Covid-19.
’ That leaves us reassured that cash can not be accused of carrying anything too harmful .
‘ No evidence ’ of coronavirus found on Tubes and buses Experts checking the Tube and buses for Covid-19 have found no evidence of the virus .
Imperial College has been carrying out monthly tests on London transport for coronavirus in the air and in common areas touched by passengers .
The testing , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ machines able to draw in 300 litres of air every minute to check air quality on public transport and in stations .
Swabs were also taken from ticket machines , barriers and hand rails , and no Covid-19 was found .
Experts have been carrying out monthly tests on London transport for Covid-19 in the air and in common areas touched by passengers ( Picture : PA / @ RodolfoAngelel1 / Twitter ) Lilli Matson , TfL ’ s chief health , safety and environment officer , said : ‘ The range of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ transport network to ensure it is cleaner and safer than ever is huge .
‘ We have been using hospital-grade cleaning fluids , installed hand sanitiser points across the network and changed cleaning schedules to ensure that stations are cleaned even more regularly .
‘ We want to reassure customers who need to use the network that we are doing everything we can to keep the network safe , and this testing will help ensure we continue to do so.
’ The results are used to ensure regular cleaning with anti-viral fluid of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Testing was carried out in Waterloo and Euston stations and on the Northern line and on selected bus routes , the same in previous months .
Professor Sir Roy Anderson , an epidemiologist at Imperial College , who was not involved in the research , said that in general ‘ surface contact is not the main issue ’ for the transmission of Covid-19 .
He told the Evening Standard : ‘ The main issue is our behaviour as individuals and groups .
Outdoors , the likelihood of transmission is much less than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ airborne .
That is the bit that is most important .
‘ Contaminated surfaces , of course you have got to pay attention to .
My own view is that it is more aerosol-related transmission – inhaling those droplets or micro-droplets.
’ Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

ER Editor: We’re not sure of the point of this story, with players like Imperial College (home of the infamous, very wrong, doom-and-gloom merchant Neil Ferguson) and Sadiq Khan (globalist mayor of London) behind it.
Is it the result of a fear campaign that’s been too successful such that many fewer people are using London public transport than the govt would like?
Is it proof of a government ‘caring’ by disinfecting so much that it’s all ‘healthy’?
None of which makes any sense because the teeming masses that use public transport every day, such as the Underground, will put out many bacteria and viruses daily before it can get a thorough cleaning at night, if indeed such is the case. And given the much-publicized evidence that masks don’t work for miniscule virus particles …
On face value it provokes the question, why the second lockdown if so many people can safely co-exist when packed like sardines for perhaps up to 30 minutes at a time on long journeys?
We need to remember Prof. Sir Roy Anderson’s very own words below, that in general ‘surface contact is not the main issue’ for the transmission of Covid-19.’ That leaves us reassured that cash cannot be accused of carrying anything too harmful.
*********
‘No evidence’ of coronavirus found on Tubes and buses
SIAN ELVIN
Experts checking the Tube and buses for Covid-19 have found no evidence of the virus.
Imperial College has been carrying out monthly tests on London transport for coronavirus in the air and in common areas touched by passengers. The testing, done on behalf of TfL, used machines able to draw in 300 litres of air every minute to check air quality on public transport and in stations. Swabs were also taken from ticket machines, barriers and hand rails, and no Covid-19 was found.
Experts have been carrying out monthly tests on London transport for Covid-19 in the air and in common areas touched by passengers (Picture: PA / @RodolfoAngelel1 / Twitter)
Lilli Matson, TfL’s chief health, safety and environment officer, said: ‘The range of measures in place across London’s transport network to ensure it is cleaner and safer than ever is huge.
‘We have been using hospital-grade cleaning fluids, installed hand sanitiser points across the network and changed cleaning schedules to ensure that stations are cleaned even more regularly.
‘We want to reassure customers who need to use the network that we are doing everything we can to keep the network safe, and this testing will help ensure we continue to do so.’
The results are used to ensure regular cleaning with anti-viral fluid of areas considered ‘of greater risk’.
Testing was carried out in Waterloo and Euston stations and on the Northern line and on selected bus routes, the same in previous months.
Professor Sir Roy Anderson, an epidemiologist at Imperial College, who was not involved in the research, said that in general ‘surface contact is not the main issue’ for the transmission of Covid-19. He told the Evening Standard: ‘The main issue is our behaviour as individuals and groups. Outdoors, the likelihood of transmission is much less than in enclosed spaces. These particles are airborne. That is the bit that is most important.
‘Contaminated surfaces, of course you have got to pay attention to. My own view is that it is more aerosol-related transmission – inhaling those droplets or micro-droplets.’
CONTINUE READING HERE
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-06--A Plea to MPs From Dr. Mike Yeadon: “Don’t Vote For Lockdown” [VIDEO]

ER Editor : We also recommend an interview Dr. Mike Yeadon recently did with Anna Brees of Brees Media on October 29 .
The UK entered a second lockdown today , November 5 , 2020 .
Unfortunately , Dr. Yeadon doesn ’ t appear to have his own Twitter account but many independent outlets are picking him up .
A Plea to MPs From Mike Yeadon : “ Don ’ t Vote For Lockdown ” Below is a guest post by Dr Mike Yeadon in which he urges MPs not to vote for a second lockdown .
I am an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leading research into new medicines , operating up to Vice President and head of Respiratory Research at Pfizer , a US pharmaceutical company and founder and CEO of Ziarco Ltd a biotechnology company sold to Novartis in 2017 .
As an independent I am less constrained than academics and commercial persons .
However , I have applied the same rigour to analysing the pandemic since March as with any of my former projects .
• I am certain the pandemic is over and was over before the end of June .
• There @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in spring .
COVID-19 clearly caused many deaths , mostly of the elderly and already ill. • Turning to late summer and into the autumn – despite exaggerated claims that there is an ongoing full-blown pandemic , there are still FEWER respiratory deaths than at the same time periods in all five of the years since 2015 .
The below shows monthly deaths with any respiratory primary diagnoses , including COVID-19 .
There is a small and potentially growing all-causes excess mortality signal .
I am working with a pathologist and our evaluation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are inconsistent with being COVID-19 .
In short , they are not dying from respiratory illness , but from heart failure and from cerebrovascular accidents such as stroke and diabetes .
An awful realisation I have is that these excess deaths are just the sort you would expect if you take a mixed population , deprive them of easy access to the healthcare system for seven months and keep them stressed .
Looking at data obtained from contacts within the NHS , we do not have hospitals full of respiratory patients to any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ There are always hotspots , and we know Liverpool is one such today .
Again , the evidence is against this being due to COVID-19 .
And to repeat , we have not had excess respiratory deaths since the spring event itself .
Liverpool and other cities and towns nearby have additional capacity and ‘ surge capacity ’ , if required .
The NHS as a whole is not in crisis and there is nothing to suggest it is about to be .
I also checked with a colleague regarding intensive care beds @ @ @ @ @ @ @ occupants have tested positive for COVID-19 , intensive care beds are at exactly normal loadings for the time of year , i.e .
82 % .
I believe those COVID-19 diagnoses are mostly or all incorrect .
We have tested well over 30,000,000 people .
It wouldn ’ t be surprising if lots of people get a false diagnosis from a PCR test .
Antibody prevalence in the blood of those surveyed periodically is falling steadily and has been since its peak in the spring , when the virus was moving very fast @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of thousands per day at its very peak .
That antibodies are falling was last week wrongly touted as problematic and suggested immunity was fading .
That ’ s the wrong interpretation .
The human body does not maintain high levels of antibodies , which are not needed .
Consequently , steady falls in prevalence of antibodies is a clear signal that people are no longer encountering the virus .
I believe that insofar as it is still present , it has become endemic at low levels and represents no threat to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ experienced at reading into adjacent areas of science , which I have done time without number since obtaining my PhD in respiratory pharmacology in 1988 , I was always confident that the population would speedily attain ‘ community immunity ’ .
This is what I believe has happened as detailed in my article “ What SAGE has got wrong ” .
In my view – probably because SAGE lacked cellular and clinical immunologist expertise earlier this year and at no time during this event has it seconded a pathologist or an expert generalist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ made a series of terrible errors which continue to infect policy to this very day .
If such experts had been consulted , our advice would have made a huge difference , not least to the starting assumptions which are widely criticised as outlandish in the scientific community .
In addition , we could have “ sense checked ” some of the more perplexingly unlikely predictions , such as 4,000 deaths per day .
The most fundamental error SAGE has made was to ignore all evidence of the very existence of prior immunity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that this was a novel virus .
This virus is in fact related to four common-cold producing coronaviruses in general circulation and it has been shown unequivocally that a sizeable proportion of the peoples of at least Europe and North America possess T-cells that provide them with some protection against both endemic and novel viruses .
This virus is a serious threat to a low proportion of the elderly , especially if they are already ill .
This description of the most vulnerable accounts for the vast majority of Covid deaths and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ died of COVID-19 is slightly older than the median age of those who died of all other causes .
However , the majority even of this elderly group survive infection .
Overall , the lethality of the virus is now known to be very close to typical seasonal influenza .
Notably , in relation to risks to the working population , the lethality of the virus in those aged 60 and younger is actually less than seasonal flu .
By using several sets of data I have been able to estimate the proportion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ infected .
If you add them to the estimated proportion of the population that had prior immunity , and take account of the fact that young children do not often participate in transmission or become very ill , it is clear that there are far too few susceptible people remaining in UK to support an expanding infection as has been suggested .
Instead , the evidence is strong from practical , theoretical and observational standpoints that the nation as a whole , and probably most if not all regions in the UK , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ described by many world leading academic epidemiologists in UK .
I heard with disbelief suggestions that surviving infection might not lead to immunity , or that immunity might only last a few months .
Let me assure you , we have known for scores of years that surviving simple respiratory viruses which are neither immuno-toxic like HIV or change their appearance yearly like flu , leads as a rule , not an exception , to long-lived and robust T-cell mediated immunity .
Antibodies may play a role but they are not central .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ global media event is simply not justified by its profile .
I have been active on Twitter rather a lot in recent months .
I would suggest that the people of UK are now highly suspicious of what is claimed to be happening .
Many is the time people have in exasperation said : “ This just doesn ’ t make any sense.
” Indeed , what we are being told ( that there is a full blown pandemic still underway ) does not make sense and while I have no idea why @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doubtless incorrect .
Ordinary people know that each season ’ s flu takes perhaps three-to-four months to pass through the whole population .
Knowing that SARS-CoV-2 is more infectious , they know that it would take the same or less time to pass through the UK population , not more .
Indeed , we know it was in the UK by February .
Adding a generous four months takes us to June , where all clinical signs of COVID-19 has disappeared ( ignoring PCR test results , of which more in a moment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Covid deaths in the UK follows exactly the same curve as that of other , highly seeded/infected countries such as Sweden .
There is no doubt that we are in the same position as Sweden and it is only the monstrously error-prone and untrustworthy PCR test that suggests otherwise .
What SAGE claims is happening is immunologically implausible in light of other data , specifically the shape of the death versus time curve , which shows beyond all reasonable doubt that the pandemic was self-extinguishing .
The PCR testing machinery is , at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ misleading .
I have good knowledge of mass testing systems .
I have always been deeply worried about polymerase chain reaction ( PCR ) because of its power , not only to find one molecule as small as a broken fragment of viral RNA and amplify it , sometimes by two to the power of 40 , through repeated cycling , but also because it can find something that is not there – it can yield a ‘ positive ’ result even though the virus is not present .
The greater the amplification @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being done each day day – and the lower the expertise of the staff doing it – the higher the probability of error .
I was the person who , with a radio journalist , finally pressed Mr Hancock to disclose the false positive rate of the Pillar 2 test , when it was still measuring far fewer tests per day than now .
Having established that false positives exist , it is important to know that the rate of these can be small yet , when the prevalence of the virus is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ positive results are false .
That ’ s a practical debate for another time .
Yesterday , in response to a written question , the Government disclosed that while attempts had apparently been made to determine the operational false positive rate , it still doesn ’ t know it .
As an experienced lab scientist , I know that when testing capacity is boosted substantially and the staff recruited have less and less lab experiences , there is only one outcome : errors of handling and of procedure .
These in turn destroy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The entire response of the UK depends upon the reliability of these tests .
I have to tell you quite firmly : at present , it is practically , logically and legally impossible for anyone to be able to tell you what fraction of the positive tests recently obtained are real and which are not .
For a range of reasons related to strong evidence that this virus can not just hover around as it has been suggested , and viruses certainly do not perform waves ever , the most secure conclusion is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trusted and are not reliable in any way .
So what I am saying is this .
Despite warnings from all sides over months about this test , it has continued to be used with increasing ferocity .
It ’ s a medical diagnostic test .
On no occasion would such a diagnostic be put into mass testing – in the NHS , for example – without knowing in advance how reliable it is .
In terms of proper characterisation , it has NEVER been measured , despite the war-like impact of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people .
At a minimum , the charge is reckless endangerment .
Given all this information , it is literally impossible to guess whether the FPR is 1 % or 10 % .
If even near the latter , there are no “ cases ” et seq .
And there are other reasons to be very concerned about mass testing which I can not go into today .
In my view , community mass testing is the pathology in the country now – not the virus .
It must cease today .
Without @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , there is no evidence at all that the health of the nation is under any threat whatsoever .
That event occurred in spring and our responses to it have been exaggerated and – what is worse – extraordinarily persistent , even when all the evidence says the pandemic has concluded .
I have a colleague who has a half a dozen sets of data all related to the pandemic .
These show clear relationships between the data in the spring , all of which illustrated the impact of the virus .
However @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have broken down .
The explanation for this is that at least one of the measurements are wrong , and the culprit is the PCR test .
This has happened before .
In New Hampshire in the USA there was a hospital that was convinced it had a huge outbreak of whooping cough .
Physicians , patients and parents were all very worried about the expected deaths .
Eventually , an older physician examined some of the patients and did not agree with the diagnosis .
Asking the staff why they were so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ answer was it had been diagnosed by the PCR test , the sole diagnostic tool .
A review was ordered and this led to culture of the organism from the suspected patients .
There was not a single person who actually had whooping cough .
No infectious organism was found .
What had happened was a now infamous case of a “ PCR False Positive Pseudo-epidemic ” .
That is what I believe we have now in UK and in many other countries using similar technology .
MPs : If you vote for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people to suffering and some to death , and the evidence does not support this extreme measure for which , even if the virus was circulating as SAGE claims , there is no evidence of benefit .
I urge you to vote against so we can all disclose our evidence that the pandemic is over and the epidemic of PCR testing can end .
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com

ER Editor: We also recommend an interview Dr. Mike Yeadon recently did with Anna Brees of Brees Media on October 29. The UK entered a second lockdown today, November 5, 2020.
Unfortunately, Dr. Yeadon doesn’t appear to have his own Twitter account but many independent outlets are picking him up.
********
A Plea to MPs From Mike Yeadon: “Don’t Vote For Lockdown”
Below is a guest post by Dr Mike Yeadon in which he urges MPs not to vote for a second lockdown.
Dear Sirs and Madams,
I am an independent scientist of over 30 years experience leading research into new medicines, operating up to Vice President and head of Respiratory Research at Pfizer, a US pharmaceutical company and founder and CEO of Ziarco Ltd a biotechnology company sold to Novartis in 2017.
As an independent I am less constrained than academics and commercial persons. However, I have applied the same rigour to analysing the pandemic since March as with any of my former projects.
In brief:
I am certain the pandemic is over and was over before the end of June.
There was a clear peak of excess deaths in spring. COVID-19 clearly caused many deaths, mostly of the elderly and already ill.
Turning to late summer and into the autumn – despite exaggerated claims that there is an ongoing full-blown pandemic, there are still FEWER respiratory deaths than at the same time periods in all five of the years since 2015. The below shows monthly deaths with any respiratory primary diagnoses, including COVID-19.
There is a small and potentially growing all-causes excess mortality signal. I am working with a pathologist and our evaluation so far shows that these excess deaths are inconsistent with being COVID-19. In short, they are not dying from respiratory illness, but from heart failure and from cerebrovascular accidents such as stroke and diabetes. An awful realisation I have is that these excess deaths are just the sort you would expect if you take a mixed population, deprive them of easy access to the healthcare system for seven months and keep them stressed.
Looking at data obtained from contacts within the NHS, we do not have hospitals full of respiratory patients to any greater extent than usual for November. There are always hotspots, and we know Liverpool is one such today. Again, the evidence is against this being due to COVID-19. And to repeat, we have not had excess respiratory deaths since the spring event itself. Liverpool and other cities and towns nearby have additional capacity and ‘surge capacity’, if required. The NHS as a whole is not in crisis and there is nothing to suggest it is about to be. I also checked with a colleague regarding intensive care beds. While an increasing number of their occupants have tested positive for COVID-19, intensive care beds are at exactly normal loadings for the time of year, i.e. 82%. I believe those COVID-19 diagnoses are mostly or all incorrect. We have tested well over 30,000,000 people. It wouldn’t be surprising if lots of people get a false diagnosis from a PCR test.
Antibody prevalence in the blood of those surveyed periodically is falling steadily and has been since its peak in the spring, when the virus was moving very fast through the population, infecting perhaps hundreds of thousands per day at its very peak. That antibodies are falling was last week wrongly touted as problematic and suggested immunity was fading. That’s the wrong interpretation. The human body does not maintain high levels of antibodies, which are not needed. Consequently, steady falls in prevalence of antibodies is a clear signal that people are no longer encountering the virus. I believe that insofar as it is still present, it has become endemic at low levels and represents no threat to the health of the nation.
As someone experienced at reading into adjacent areas of science, which I have done time without number since obtaining my PhD in respiratory pharmacology in 1988, I was always confident that the population would speedily attain ‘community immunity’. This is what I believe has happened as detailed in my article “What SAGE has got wrong”.
In my view – probably because SAGE lacked cellular and clinical immunologist expertise earlier this year and at no time during this event has it seconded a pathologist or an expert generalist such as myself – they’ve made a series of terrible errors which continue to infect policy to this very day. If such experts had been consulted, our advice would have made a huge difference, not least to the starting assumptions which are widely criticised as outlandish in the scientific community. In addition, we could have “sense checked” some of the more perplexingly unlikely predictions, such as 4,000 deaths per day.
The most fundamental error SAGE has made was to ignore all evidence of the very existence of prior immunity in the population on the spurious grounds that this was a novel virus. This virus is in fact related to four common-cold producing coronaviruses in general circulation and it has been shown unequivocally that a sizeable proportion of the peoples of at least Europe and North America possess T-cells that provide them with some protection against both endemic and novel viruses.
This virus is a serious threat to a low proportion of the elderly, especially if they are already ill. This description of the most vulnerable accounts for the vast majority of Covid deaths and the median age of those who’ve died of COVID-19 is slightly older than the median age of those who died of all other causes. However, the majority even of this elderly group survive infection. Overall, the lethality of the virus is now known to be very close to typical seasonal influenza. Notably, in relation to risks to the working population, the lethality of the virus in those aged 60 and younger is actually less than seasonal flu.
By using several sets of data I have been able to estimate the proportion of the UK population who have been infected. If you add them to the estimated proportion of the population that had prior immunity, and take account of the fact that young children do not often participate in transmission or become very ill, it is clear that there are far too few susceptible people remaining in UK to support an expanding infection as has been suggested. Instead, the evidence is strong from practical, theoretical and observational standpoints that the nation as a whole, and probably most if not all regions in the UK, are already protected by community immunity as described by many world leading academic epidemiologists in UK.
I heard with disbelief suggestions that surviving infection might not lead to immunity, or that immunity might only last a few months. Let me assure you, we have known for scores of years that surviving simple respiratory viruses which are neither immuno-toxic like HIV or change their appearance yearly like flu, leads as a rule, not an exception, to long-lived and robust T-cell mediated immunity. Antibodies may play a role but they are not central. That this ordinary virus has become a global media event is simply not justified by its profile.
I have been active on Twitter rather a lot in recent months. I would suggest that the people of UK are now highly suspicious of what is claimed to be happening. Many is the time people have in exasperation said: “This just doesn’t make any sense.” Indeed, what we are being told (that there is a full blown pandemic still underway) does not make sense and while I have no idea why it is being said, it is doubtless incorrect. Ordinary people know that each season’s flu takes perhaps three-to-four months to pass through the whole population. Knowing that SARS-CoV-2 is more infectious, they know that it would take the same or less time to pass through the UK population, not more. Indeed, we know it was in the UK by February. Adding a generous four months takes us to June, where all clinical signs of COVID-19 has disappeared (ignoring PCR test results, of which more in a moment). The rise and fall of Covid deaths in the UK follows exactly the same curve as that of other, highly seeded/infected countries such as Sweden. There is no doubt that we are in the same position as Sweden and it is only the monstrously error-prone and untrustworthy PCR test that suggests otherwise. What SAGE claims is happening is immunologically implausible in light of other data, specifically the shape of the death versus time curve, which shows beyond all reasonable doubt that the pandemic was self-extinguishing.
The PCR testing machinery is, at best, greatly in error and completely misleading. I have good knowledge of mass testing systems. I have always been deeply worried about polymerase chain reaction (PCR) because of its power, not only to find one molecule as small as a broken fragment of viral RNA and amplify it, sometimes by two to the power of 40, through repeated cycling, but also because it can find something that is not there – it can yield a ‘positive’ result even though the virus is not present. The greater the amplification and the higher the number of tests being done each day day – and the lower the expertise of the staff doing it – the higher the probability of error. I was the person who, with a radio journalist, finally pressed Mr Hancock to disclose the false positive rate of the Pillar 2 test, when it was still measuring far fewer tests per day than now. Having established that false positives exist, it is important to know that the rate of these can be small yet, when the prevalence of the virus is low, many or even all the positive results are false. That’s a practical debate for another time.
Yesterday, in response to a written question, the Government disclosed that while attempts had apparently been made to determine the operational false positive rate, it still doesn’t know it. As an experienced lab scientist, I know that when testing capacity is boosted substantially and the staff recruited have less and less lab experiences, there is only one outcome: errors of handling and of procedure. These in turn destroy the integrity of the testing system. The entire response of the UK depends upon the reliability of these tests. I have to tell you quite firmly: at present, it is practically, logically and legally impossible for anyone to be able to tell you what fraction of the positive tests recently obtained are real and which are not. For a range of reasons related to strong evidence that this virus cannot just hover around as it has been suggested, and viruses certainly do not perform waves ever, the most secure conclusion is that these results are not to be trusted and are not reliable in any way.
So what I am saying is this. Despite warnings from all sides over months about this test, it has continued to be used with increasing ferocity. It’s a medical diagnostic test. On no occasion would such a diagnostic be put into mass testing – in the NHS, for example – without knowing in advance how reliable it is. In terms of proper characterisation, it has NEVER been measured, despite the war-like impact of the test results on the nation and its people. At a minimum, the charge is reckless endangerment. Given all this information, it is literally impossible to guess whether the FPR is 1% or 10%. If even near the latter, there are no “cases” et seq. And there are other reasons to be very concerned about mass testing which I cannot go into today.
In my view, community mass testing is the pathology in the country now – not the virus. It must cease today. Without the ‘cover’ of mass testing, there is no evidence at all that the health of the nation is under any threat whatsoever. That event occurred in spring and our responses to it have been exaggerated and – what is worse – extraordinarily persistent, even when all the evidence says the pandemic has concluded.
I have a colleague who has a half a dozen sets of data all related to the pandemic. These show clear relationships between the data in the spring, all of which illustrated the impact of the virus. However, time after time, these relationships have broken down. The explanation for this is that at least one of the measurements are wrong, and the culprit is the PCR test. This has happened before. In New Hampshire in the USA there was a hospital that was convinced it had a huge outbreak of whooping cough. Physicians, patients and parents were all very worried about the expected deaths. Eventually, an older physician examined some of the patients and did not agree with the diagnosis. Asking the staff why they were so sure it was whooping cough, the answer was it had been diagnosed by the PCR test, the sole diagnostic tool. A review was ordered and this led to culture of the organism from the suspected patients. There was not a single person who actually had whooping cough. No infectious organism was found. What had happened was a now infamous case of a “PCR False Positive Pseudo-epidemic”. That is what I believe we have now in UK and in many other countries using similar technology.
MPs: If you vote for it now, you will condemn more people to suffering and some to death, and the evidence does not support this extreme measure for which, even if the virus was circulating as SAGE claims, there is no evidence of benefit.
I urge you to vote against so we can all disclose our evidence that the pandemic is over and the epidemic of PCR testing can end.
************
Source
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-06--The coup: what to expect

The coup: what to expect

How is all this going to go ?
On one side of the fence we have currently an authoritarian government that governs by the diktat and edict of a handful of ministers and their “ scientific ” advisers .
Said edicts , illegal orders and “ you musts ” are “ justified ” by a stream of lies and false statistics so poorly fabricated and sloppily assembled they are an insult to our intelligence .
As the weeks roll by , those lies and false reports will continue to become increasingly obvious to an increasing number of people , as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ imposition of a police state makes itself more strongly felt .
This process is inevitable and will continue .
As it continues so will the resistance grow .
The coup is the work of a handful of people and their collaborators .
These are people who think that by virtue of some innate ( hah ! )
superiority , they have a God-given right to lie to the People , wreck their lives and livelihoods and browbeat , propagandise or terrorise them into compliance in service of their own minority interests .
They @ @ @ @ @ @ @ perfectly all right to hijack the constabulary or the army and turn honorable men and women into their bully boys , whom – they think – they can then use to bludgeon the citizenry into submission when it won ’ t obey .
The resistance has already sprung spontaneously into being and grown and expanded at a phenomenal rate .
There is every sign that its growth is accelerating .
It will continue to accelerate as the initial shock wears off and people , hitherto unaccustomed to such things , face the reality @ @ @ @ @ @ @ countries across the planet – have been the target of a coup .
But it is what it is .
The reality is there for those willing to look and you will find that over time , more and more people will become willing to look and , in effect agree to disagree with has been attempted by a handful of self-appointed herdsmen who consider us cattle .
Look at how the ranks of those who have disagreed have swollen in just a few weeks !
Look at how the few have become @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , so will others become emboldened to embrace their new ideas .
Soon we will wind up up with virtually every citizen capable of initiative and independent reason on one side of the fence and the handful of privileged front men and their sly puppet masters on the other .
It is even possible ( but don ’ t hold your breath on this one just yet ) that Parliament and the judiciary will wake up and side with The People .
The privileged few will find The People increasingly withdraw their cooperation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ People is the death knell of any government .
ANY government , to govern , requires cooperation and agreement from the governed – at the very least a dedicated hard core of support .
No government can long sustain its authority by using force alone to achieve compliance .
Expect , then , that compliance/belief/cooperation to erode .
As it does so , watch the handful of little Hitlers who have temporarily seized the helm ( and just looking at the poor calibre of those people , my God we really must have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ increasingly to the army and the police .
Governments turn to their soldiers to “ enforce their edicts ” upon an uncooperative people out of fear .
It is all they have left when they no longer have the agreement and belief that guarantee compliance .
But there is no guarantee the soldiers and the police won ’ t side with The People .
For they are The People too .
And how many of them have pledged dedicated allegiance to Boris Johnson as their glorious leader ?
The above article is from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small @ @ @ @ @ @ @ support and your considerations … ( TLB )

by Caratacus
How is all this going to go?
On one side of the fence we have currently an authoritarian government that governs by the diktat and edict of a handful of ministers and their “scientific” advisers.
Said edicts, illegal orders and “you musts” are “justified” by a stream of lies and false statistics so poorly fabricated and sloppily assembled they are an insult to our intelligence.
As the weeks roll by, those lies and false reports will continue to become increasingly obvious to an increasing number of people, as will the intention behind them as the imposition of a police state makes itself more strongly felt.
This process is inevitable and will continue. As it continues so will the resistance grow.
The coup is the work of a handful of people and their collaborators. These are people who think that by virtue of some innate (hah!) superiority, they have a God-given right to lie to the People, wreck their lives and livelihoods and browbeat, propagandise or terrorise them into compliance in service of their own minority interests.
They are people who also think it is perfectly all right to hijack the constabulary or the army and turn honorable men and women into their bully boys, whom – they think – they can then use to bludgeon the citizenry into submission when it won’t obey.
The resistance has already sprung spontaneously into being and grown and expanded at a phenomenal rate. There is every sign that its growth is accelerating.
It will continue to accelerate as the initial shock wears off and people, hitherto unaccustomed to such things, face the reality that our country – and many other countries across the planet – have been the target of a coup.
But it is what it is. The reality is there for those willing to look and you will find that over time, more and more people will become willing to look and, in effect agree to disagree with has been attempted by a handful of self-appointed herdsmen who consider us cattle.
Look at how the ranks of those who have disagreed have swollen in just a few weeks! Look at how the few have become the many! As their numbers grow, so will others become emboldened to embrace their new ideas.
Soon we will wind up up with virtually every citizen capable of initiative and independent reason on one side of the fence and the handful of privileged front men and their sly puppet masters on the other.
It is even possible (but don’t hold your breath on this one just yet) that Parliament and the judiciary will wake up and side with The People.
The privileged few will find The People increasingly withdraw their cooperation. The withdrawal of cooperation by The People is the death knell of any government.
ANY government, to govern, requires cooperation and agreement from the governed – at the very least a dedicated hard core of support. No government can long sustain its authority by using force alone to achieve compliance.
Expect, then, that compliance/belief/cooperation to erode. As it does so, watch the handful of little Hitlers who have temporarily seized the helm (and just looking at the poor calibre of those people, my God we really must have been asleep!), to turn increasingly to the army and the police.
Governments turn to their soldiers to “enforce their edicts” upon an uncooperative people out of fear. It is all they have left when they no longer have the agreement and belief that guarantee compliance.
But there is no guarantee the soldiers and the police won’t side with The People. For they are The People too.
And how many of them have pledged dedicated allegiance to Boris Johnson as their glorious leader?
Lol!
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-06--Why Trump Will Triumph in PA Litigation

Why Trump Will Triumph in PA Litigation

Why Trump Will Triumph in PA Litigation If you ’ ve been following the mainstream media , you ’ ve probably read that Trump intends to file a lawsuit in Pennsylvania to “ stop counting votes.
” Most likely , this has been presented as an outrageous evil , unjustifiable by any standards of common decency , and grossly unconstitutional .
Is that really the case ?
Or is it more complex than that ?
There will be a lawsuit , no doubt ; and it will involve a lot of votes being thrown out .
The plaintiff ( Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because Pennsylvania ’ s highest court has almost certainly violated the Constitution of the United States .
That ’ s why , in the weeks ahead , the Supreme Court of the United States ( SCOTUS ) is going to rule in favor of Trump .
Again , translating this into common English , the US Constitution grants state legislators the exclusive right to prescribe the time , place , and manner of holding elections , and to direct the appointment of the electors .
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court didn ’ t just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It re-wrote Act 77 itself , by judicial fiat , creating new rules for time , place , and manner , of holding elections .
In doing so , the State Supreme Court violated the US Federal Constitution .
And that ’ s the real case here .
The US Supreme Court is going to rule that the State Supreme Court violated the US Constitution , the State Supreme Court ’ s ruling is going to be overturned , and the votes that arrived after 8 PM on election day will be discarded @ @ @ @ @ @ @ win Pennsylvania .
( TLB ) published this article by Alexander Macris from Tree of Woe with our sincere gratitude for this thoughtful perspective .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior @ @ @ @ @ @ @ educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Why Trump Will Triumph in PA Litigation
The State Supreme Court has Violated the US Constitution
If you’ve been following the mainstream media, you’ve probably read that Trump intends to file a lawsuit in Pennsylvania to “stop counting votes.” Most likely, this has been presented as an outrageous evil, unjustifiable by any standards of common decency, and grossly unconstitutional. Is that really the case? Or is it more complex than that?
There will be a lawsuit, no doubt; and it will involve a lot of votes being thrown out. The plaintiff (Trump and/or the Republicans) will win, because Pennsylvania’s highest court has almost certainly violated the Constitution of the United States. That’s why, in the weeks ahead, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is going to rule in favor of Trump.
_________
(TLB) Editor: If you want to know all about the ‘nuts and bolts’ of how we got to where we are today, our author will wind the clock back about a week to explain with just the Click of Your Mouse here.
_________
Cut To The Chase
Again, translating this into common English, the US Constitution grants state legislators the exclusive right to prescribe the time, place, and manner of holding elections, and to direct the appointment of the electors.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court didn’t just say “Act 77 is unconstitutional.” It re-wrote Act 77 itself, by judicial fiat, creating new rules for time, place, and manner, of holding elections. In doing so, the State Supreme Court violated the US Federal Constitution.
And that’s the real case here. The US Supreme Court is going to rule that the State Supreme Court violated the US Constitution, the State Supreme Court’s ruling is going to be overturned, and the votes that arrived after 8 PM on election day will be discarded. On that basis, Trump will win Pennsylvania.
*********
(TLB) published this article by Alexander Macris from Tree of Woe with our sincere gratitude for this thoughtful perspective.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-06--Nevada: Claims of voter-fraud in criminal referral to AG Barr

Lawyers for Nevada GOP cite claims of voter-fraud in criminal referral to Atty Gen Barr A legal team for the Nevada Republican Party has sent a criminal referral to the office of Attorney General William Barr , alleging reports of over 3,000 instances of voter fraud in the state , where as of Friday morning the race between President Trump and Democrat Joe Biden had yet to be decided .
The team of attorneys reportedly cross-referenced the names and addresses of the voters in question using the National Change of Address database .
“ Thousands of individuals have been identified @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by casting ballots after they moved from NV , ” tweeted the party ’ s account .
“ Voter fraud is a serious federal felony , one that cuts to the heart of representative democracy .
We understand that these are serous allegation and we do not make them lightly , ” reads the letter , according to Fox News .
A Justice Department spokesperson confirmed that the criminal referral letter sent Thursday had been received and would be investigated in a manner consistent with standard procedure .
The Nevada GOP has broadcast @ @ @ @ @ @ @ individuals who are not yet 18-years of age , and therefore ineligible to vote , in addition to individuals claiming the identities of their dead relatives had ben used to cast ballots this election .
Nevada as of Friday morning still had over 190,000 votes left to count , most of which are from Clark County , in which Democrat-leaning Las Vegas is located .
A majority of those ballots were returned by mail , with about 66,500 being cast in person .
The county , according to state law , but continue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ before Election Day until Nov. 10 .
Scrutiny of top PA election official grows as GOP says she ‘ fundamentally altered ’ outcome Trump campaign : Fox News election guru who called Arizona for Biden conflicted by Democrat loyalties ( TLB ) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News Some emphasis and pictorial content added by ( TLB ) Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Lawyers for Nevada GOP cite claims of voter-fraud in criminal referral to Atty Gen Barr
Reports of fraudulent voting practice have been ticking up in the western state that has yet to tally all of its votes.
By Sophie Mann
A legal team for the Nevada Republican Party has sent a criminal referral to the office of Attorney General William Barr, alleging reports of over 3,000 instances of voter fraud in the state, where as of Friday morning the race between President Trump and Democrat Joe Biden had yet to be decided.
(Anna Moneymaker-Pool/Getty Images)
The team of attorneys reportedly cross-referenced the names and addresses of the voters in question using the National Change of Address database.
“Thousands of individuals have been identified who appear to have violated the law by casting ballots after they moved from NV,” tweeted the party’s account.
Our lawyers just sent a criminal referral to AG Barr regarding at least 3,062 instances of voter fraud. We expect that number to grow substantially. Thousands of individuals have been identified who appear to have violated the law by casting ballots after they moved from NV. — Nevada GOP (@NVGOP) November 6, 2020
“Voter fraud is a serious federal felony, one that cuts to the heart of representative democracy. We understand that these are serous allegation and we do not make them lightly,” reads the letter, according to Fox News.
A Justice Department spokesperson confirmed that the criminal referral letter sent Thursday had been received and would be investigated in a manner consistent with standard procedure.
The Nevada GOP has broadcast several instances of ballots being mailed to individuals who are not yet 18-years of age, and therefore ineligible to vote, in addition to individuals claiming the identities of their dead relatives had ben used to cast ballots this election.
Nevada as of Friday morning still had over 190,000 votes left to count, most of which are from Clark County, in which Democrat-leaning Las Vegas is located. A majority of those ballots were returned by mail, with about 66,500 being cast in person.
The county, according to state law, but continue accepting and processed ballots postmarked on or before Election Day until Nov. 10.
_________
Other articles of interest
*********
(TLB) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News
Some emphasis and pictorial content added by (TLB)
Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.