thelibertybeacon--2020-04-24--Who controls the British Govt’s response to Covid–19?

There is now serious doubt over the correlation between lockdown and saving lives .
Reality is creeping into the Covid–19 dialogue .
It is becoming apparent that people are getting sick because they are being isolated and effectively living under house arrest , condemned as “ murderers ” if they so much as think about breaking curfew , being snitched on by neighbours for “ gathering ” more than two people together in their back gardens .
The following graph was produced by UK Column and demonstrates the lack of correlation between lockdown and “ saving lives ” : The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a smokescreen .
It is impossible to rely upon “ official ” statistics , which vary wildly from one website to another – statistics that rely upon unreliable and sporadic testing procedures , and based upon death certificates that misrepresent the actual cause of death as Covid–19 , regardless of pre-existing medical conditions .
Statistics , too , that were set in stone very early on in the development stages , when the perspective was limited and compressed , before a true picture could be seen .
The newly emerging statistics are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the futility and negative consequences of lockdown .
It is now accepted that there is a high mortality rate among the elderly in care homes in the UK and globally — among the same elderly civilians who are being “ asked ” to sign DNRs ( Do Not Resuscitate ) forms .
This amounts to signing their own death warrant should they present any of the Covid–19 symptoms .
They will be neglected , isolated from their families when at their most vulnerable and left alone to die , even though it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the virus .
Instead of offering proactive and positive suggestions that will enable our immune systems to combat the disease , the British Government is ensuring conditions that will suppress immune systems to dangerous levels and create the perfect environment for Covid–19 to flourish .
Britain has now received an estimated 1.4 million new benefit claims for welfare payments , “ about seven times the normal level ” .
The government has pledged to bail out “ 80 % of pay of workers who are temporarily laid off ” but I have personally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ falling between the cracks that qualify them for financial support and now face an indefinite period of time without income .
These measures are being imposed in a country that , since 2012 , has seen an exponential growth in child poverty to potentially sub-Victorian levels .
In March 2019 , the number of children living in “ absolute poverty ” grew by a staggering 200,000 in a twelve-month period to a total of 3.7 million .
How will this number be further impacted by lockdown ?
How did we arrive at this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ towards this questionable and alarmist lockdown policy ?
The unexamined assumption is that conclusions were formed on the basis of sound epidemiological analysis and research by doctors and scientists who care about our welfare .
The reality is what we will examine in this article .
Neil Ferguson , a professor at Imperial College , was responsible for the modelling of a response to Covid–19 .
His virtual model was recommended by the World Health Organisation ( WHO ) and it passed through into policy with virtually no scrutiny .
Ferguson ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ UK became the foundation of Boris Johnson ’ s U-turn from herd immunity to collective quarantine .
While some understood that Ferguson later reduced his mortality calculations , he actually doubled down on his projections on Twitter , insisting that without drastic lockdown measures being taken , the numbers would be even higher .
Ferguson is acting director of the Vaccine Impact Modelling Consortium ( VIMC ) , which is based at Imperial College in London .
According to Ferguson ’ s biography on the website , “ much of [ his ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ policy-making by public and global health institutions.
” The professor who derailed Johnson ’ s semblance of “ herd immunity ” strategy is no stranger to controversy and is described as having a “ patchy ” record of modelling pandemics by one of his academic peers , Professor Michael Thrusfield of Edinburgh University , an expert in animal diseases .
Ferguson was instrumental in the modelling of the British Government ’ s response to Foot and Mouth Disease ( FMD ) in 2001 , which Thrusfield describes as “ not fit for purpose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ flawed ” ( 2012 ) .
Thrusfield has highlighted the limitations of Ferguson ’ s mathematical modelling methods , and applied the doubts he expressed over FMD to the current Covid–19 “ crisis ” response .
An estimated twelve million animals were slaughtered as a result of Ferguson ’ s 2001 initiative .
The farming community was devastated by suicides and bankruptcies that irretrievably altered the landscape of British agriculture — forcing healthy smallholdings into agri-corporate mergers and empowering the EU central governance in the agricultural sector .
Insight : Slaughtered on Suspicion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in 2015 , provides a shocking insight into the suffering precipitated by Ferguson ’ s model and the “ new normal ” imposed upon Britain ’ s farming community .
The following is a statement made by one of the contributors to the programme : In 2002 , Ferguson predicted that up to 50,000 people would die from variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease , better known as “ mad cow disease ” , increasing to 150,000 if the epidemic expanded to include sheep .
The reality is : “ Since 1990 , 178 people in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , according to the National CJD Research & Surveillance Unit at the University of Edinburgh.
” ( 2017 ) In 2005 , Ferguson claimed that up to 200 million people would be killed by bird-flu or H5N1 .
By early 2006 , the WHO had only linked 78 deaths to the virus , out of 147 reported cases .
In 2009 , Ferguson and his team at Imperial College advised the government that swine flu or H1N1 would probably kill 65,000 people in the UK .
In the end , swine flu claimed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ UK .
Now , in 2020 , Ferguson and Imperial College have released a report which claims that half a million Britons and 2.2 million Americans may be killed by Covid–19 .
The report has still not been peer-reviewed ; despite this and Ferguson ’ s glaring record of mathematical sensationalism , the British Government has adopted the devastating socio-economic lockdown that Ferguson has proposed .
Why is the British Government so quick to follow Ferguson ’ s plan ?
The VIMC is hosted by the Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology at Imperial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and by “ GAVI , the vaccine alliance ” ( GAVI ’ s own title for itself ) .
Bill and Melinda Gates began funding Imperial College in 2006 , four years before the Gates Foundation launched the Global Health Leaders Launch Decade of Vaccines Collaboration ( GHLLDVC ) and one year after Ferguson had demonstrated his penchant for overblown projections on mortality numbers from H5N1 .
Up to the end of 2018 , the Gates Foundation has sponsored Imperial College with a whopping $ 185 million .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , beaten to the top spot on the podium by the Wellcome Trust , a British research charity which began funding Imperial College prior to Ferguson ’ s FMD débâcle and which , by the end of 2018 , had already provided Imperial with over $ 400 million in funding .
I will examine the Wellcome Trust ’ s connections in part two of this series .
The Gates Foundation established the GHLLDVC in collaboration with the WHO , UNICEF and the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ( NIAID ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gates Foundation website : The Collaboration ’ s leadership council at the time included the Director-General of the WHO , the Director of NIAID , the Director of UNICEF , the President of Gates Foundation Global Health , and the Chair of the African Malaria Alliance .
The steering committee included the Director of Immunisation , the UK Department of Health , and many other representatives from the WHO , UNICEF and associated organisations .
It is a cluster of immunisation-focused individuals controlling the policy of world health governing bodies , who claim @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nominated as the “ directing and coordinating authority on international health within the United Nations system ” and was set up to be responsible for “ shaping the health research agenda ” , among other tasks linked to the policy of global immunisation .
UNICEF , the “ world ’ s largest provider of vaccines for developing countries ” has on-the-ground access to children in over 150 territories and countries ( 2010 ) .
We are already seeing the potential for some serious conflict of interest behind the Ferguson model on Covid–19 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as the connections are now made to an entire pharmaceutical complex potentially protecting its own interests over any genuine concerns for the health and welfare of global populations .
GAVI is funded and partnered by the same network that forms the GHLLDVC , with some noticeable additions : the World Bank and donor/implementing country governments .
The Gates Foundation is a primary sponsor , but is topped by the British Government , which was instrumental in creating GAVI and is its largest donor .
While many sectors of British society have seen their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ severely neglected , a National Health Service in decline and homelessness on the increase , the British Government , via UKAID , has pledged £1.44 billion to GAVI for 2016–2020 and will be hosting the 2020 GAVI pledging conference , which is due to take place in June 2020 to “ mobilise at least US $ 7.4 billion in additional resources to protect the next generation with vaccines , reduce disease inequality and create a healthier , safer and more prosperous world.
” ( Emphasis added ) The conference promises to bring together @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and private donors , vaccine manufacturers and governments to support GAVI , the vaccine alliance — which boasts that it has “ helped vaccinate almost half the world ’ s children against deadly and debilitating infectious diseases ” .
This claim will be met with praise from the pro-vaccine lobby but concerns over the efficacy and safety of these mass vaccination programmes must be taken into account , particularly when being tested in poorer , developing countries .
Global vaccination market revenue worldwide is projected to reach $ 59.2 billion by 2020 ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ arrival of Covid–19 .
The British Government ’ s investment in GAVI alongside vaccine promoter Bill Gates must , again , raise the issue of conflicts of interest .
To what extent is the British Government protecting its own assets in forcing the lockdown upon its population ?
Vaccines are set to be a major source of income for the world ’ s largest pharmaceutical corporations , and the British Government is invested in that lucrative future .
The GAVI replenishment conference is to be hosted by a British Government whose lockdown policy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is collectively punishing the most vulnerable in British society .
When Bill Gates partnered with GAVI twenty years ago , he had been considering where next to focus his philanthropy and was “ increasingly focusing on the power and potential of vaccines ” .
It was Gates ’ substantial sponsorship that launched GAVI , and ten years later Gates launched his own “ vaccine decade ” plan for the 2010s .
The Global Vaccine Action Plan ( GVAP ) 2012–2020 , endorsed by the 194 member states participating in the World Health Assembly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the same members of the Gates “ vaccine decade ” consortium , promoted by the WHO , and brings together governments , elected officials , health professionals , academia , manufacturers , global agencies , research and development , civil society , media and the private sector — to promote global immunisation .
This is a profit-driven corporate complex harnessing the “ humanitarian ” sector to lend credence to the claims of philanthropy , or more realistically , philanthrocapitalism .
A glance at the partner page of the GAVI website reveals that not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ campaigns , it is also closely connected to the Gates , Microsoft and Rockefeller Foundation seed-funded ID2020 project ( Digital Identity Alliance ) , which incorporates Accenture , Microsoft ( Gates ) , Ideo-Org and Rockefeller Foundation into the GAVI alliance , all with ties to the ID2020 initiative .
ID2020 is promoting the concept that there is a need for universal biometric verification , because “ to prove who you are is a fundamental and universal human right , ” as asserted on the ID2020 website .
An article by journalist Kurt @ @ @ @ @ @ @ humanitarian ” alibi for tyranny .
Nimmo describes the potential for Covid–19 to be used as cover for mandatory biometric ID .
An April article carried by Reuters confirms the suspicion that biometric ID might soon be introduced , ostensibly to “ help verify those who already had the infection and ensure the vulnerable get the vaccine when it is launched ” .
This may sound perfectly sensible to those who are buying the government strap-lines on Covid–19 but — as Nimmo warns us — “ COVID–19 is the perfect Trojan horse for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only micromanage the lives of ordinary citizens but also ferret out critics and potential adversaries and punish them as enemies of the state.
” Prashant Yadav , senior fellow at the US-based Center for Global Development , has said : Such statements can easily be interpreted as the harbingers of mandatory vaccination and the inclusion of biometric ID in the “ humanitarian ” package .
Martin Armstrong of Armstrong Technologies introduces an even more sinister projection into the mix .
Armstrong talks about a digital certificate that verifies you have been vaccinated , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( MIT ) and Microsoft , which will merge with ID2020 .
Covid–19 will be exploited to encourage us to accept digital implants and tracking devices that will enable authorities to keep an eye on us .
Armstrong argues that just as 9/11 conditioned us to accept X-ray booths at airports , now we will be chipped alongside our dogs and cats .
At this point , it is worth remembering that UKAID is heavily involved in GAVI , and one presumes they are on board with the digital ID2020 project .
Rob @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , presented proposals for the future of digital identity back in June 2019 .
The UK Government Verify scheme was identified as a fledgling version of the future of digital ID .
Laurence describes the digital ID “ ecosystem ” that is emerging : Oliver Dowden , Minister for Implementation at the Cabinet Office ( the British Government ’ s co-ordinating department ) , will form a new Digital ID Unit to “ pave the way for the government to consume digital identities from the private sector ” .
Laurence describes 2020 as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ industry to collaborate ” in the creation of an “ interoperable digital identity market ” .
Covid19 provides the opportunity that might just fulfil these predictions .
It is no coincidence that a British start-up — Microsoft-funded Onfido — has recently raised $ 100 million to “ boost its ID technology ” to enable the creation of “ immunity passports ” for governments “ battling coronavirus ” .
In December 2019 , researchers at MIT created a “ microneedle platform using fluorescent microparticles called quantum dots ( QD ) which can deliver vaccines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ invisibly encode vaccination history in the skin ” : the QDs can be detected by specially adapted smartphones .
The “ new normal ” will mean we are tracked and monitored by our own communication systems to an even greater and more intrusive extent .
The future is being modelled — but not for our benefit In part one of this two-part series , my intention has been to raise questions over who is driving the British Government response to Covid–19 .
Those who have influenced the lockdown policy have very clear conflict @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The scientific clique influencing government decisions is one that is incorporated into a for-profit Big Pharma industrial network which will , undeniably , benefit from the measures being taken by the British Government — a government that is financially embedded in the same complex .
Why are the views of epidemiologists , doctors , scientists , analysts and health advisors who challenge the lockdown being ignored or censored by the media and by government ?
Why is the government not widening the circle of advisors to take into account these opposing perspectives @ @ @ @ @ @ @ misery that is a consequence of enforced quarantine ?
Off-Guardian has recorded these views here , here and here .
It is also worth following Swiss Propaganda Research for regular updates on emerging analysis and statistics that you will not always find in the mainstream media .
Instead , the British Government is effectively endorsing the breeding of distrust in society , the erosion of public assembly , the isolation and state-sanctioned euthanasia of the elderly , the emerging police state , snitch lines , loss of dignity and livelihoods , greater dependency @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , suicide and voluntary incarceration .
The UN has issued a warning that the economic downturn could “ kill hundreds of thousands of children in 2020 ” .
Gates , the WHO , the British Government and UNICEF are focused on global immunisation for a “ pandemic ” that is not living up to the alarmist virtual projections sponsored by Gates and the Big Pharma complex , while children really will start to die from malnutrition , neglect and a myriad of consequence of extreme poverty generated by the “ steepest downturn since @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( IMF ) .
In part two , I will delve deeper into the interlocking interests of state and private corporate sectors that should not be interfering in policies which affect the welfare of British citizens .
I will reveal how the same players are influencing the media response and ensuring that their interests are given the most powerful platforms to promote their agenda .
The questions must be asked : Who is really in charge of the Covid–19 response ?
Who benefits most ?
Who will suffer most from the long term @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from those consequences when the “ pandemic ” has disappeared from view ?
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com

There is now serious doubt over the correlation between lockdown and saving lives.
Reality is creeping into the Covid–19 dialogue. It is becoming apparent that people are getting sick because they are being isolated and effectively living under house arrest, condemned as “murderers” if they so much as think about breaking curfew, being snitched on by neighbours for “gathering” more than two people together in their back gardens.
The following graph was produced by UK Column and demonstrates the lack of correlation between lockdown and “saving lives”:
The numbers game is acting in many instances as a smokescreen. It is impossible to rely upon “official” statistics, which vary wildly from one website to another – statistics that rely upon unreliable and sporadic testing procedures, and based upon death certificates that misrepresent the actual cause of death as Covid–19, regardless of pre-existing medical conditions. Statistics, too, that were set in stone very early on in the development stages, when the perspective was limited and compressed, before a true picture could be seen. The newly emerging statistics are now increasingly undermining initial conclusions and pointing to the futility and negative consequences of lockdown.
It is now accepted that there is a high mortality rate among the elderly in care homes in the UK and globally — among the same elderly civilians who are being “asked” to sign DNRs (Do Not Resuscitate) forms. This amounts to signing their own death warrant should they present any of the Covid–19 symptoms. They will be neglected, isolated from their families when at their most vulnerable and left alone to die, even though it is possible that they have not contracted the virus.
Instead of offering proactive and positive suggestions that will enable our immune systems to combat the disease, the British Government is ensuring conditions that will suppress immune systems to dangerous levels and create the perfect environment for Covid–19 to flourish.
Britain has now received an estimated 1.4 million new benefit claims for welfare payments, “about seven times the normal level”. The government has pledged to bail out “80% of pay of workers who are temporarily laid off” but I have personally spoken to self-employed individuals who find themselves falling between the cracks that qualify them for financial support and now face an indefinite period of time without income.
These measures are being imposed in a country that, since 2012, has seen an exponential growth in child poverty to potentially sub-Victorian levels. In March 2019, the number of children living in “absolute poverty” grew by a staggering 200,000 in a twelve-month period to a total of 3.7 million. How will this number be further impacted by lockdown?
How did we arrive at this point? Who steered the UK Government towards this questionable and alarmist lockdown policy? The unexamined assumption is that conclusions were formed on the basis of sound epidemiological analysis and research by doctors and scientists who care about our welfare. The reality is what we will examine in this article.
Neil Ferguson, a professor at Imperial College, was responsible for the modelling of a response to Covid–19. His virtual model was recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO) and it passed through into policy with virtually no scrutiny. Ferguson’s dramatic prediction of 500,000 deaths in the UK became the foundation of Boris Johnson’s U-turn from herd immunity to collective quarantine.
While some understood that Ferguson later reduced his mortality calculations, he actually doubled down on his projections on Twitter, insisting that without drastic lockdown measures being taken, the numbers would be even higher.
Who is Neil Ferguson?
Ferguson is acting director of the Vaccine Impact Modelling Consortium (VIMC), which is based at Imperial College in London. According to Ferguson’s biography on the website, “much of [his] work is applied, informing disease control policy-making by public and global health institutions.”
The professor who derailed Johnson’s semblance of “herd immunity” strategy is no stranger to controversy and is described as having a “patchy” record of modelling pandemics by one of his academic peers, Professor Michael Thrusfield of Edinburgh University, an expert in animal diseases.
Ferguson was instrumental in the modelling of the British Government’s response to Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) in 2001, which Thrusfield describes as “not fit for purpose” (2006) and “seriously flawed” (2012). Thrusfield has highlighted the limitations of Ferguson’s mathematical modelling methods, and applied the doubts he expressed over FMD to the current Covid–19 “crisis” response.
An estimated twelve million animals were slaughtered as a result of Ferguson’s 2001 initiative. The farming community was devastated by suicides and bankruptcies that irretrievably altered the landscape of British agriculture — forcing healthy smallholdings into agri-corporate mergers and empowering the EU central governance in the agricultural sector.
Insight: Slaughtered on Suspicion, a documentary made by UK Column in 2015, provides a shocking insight into the suffering precipitated by Ferguson’s model and the “new normal” imposed upon Britain’s farming community. The following is a statement made by one of the contributors to the programme:
12,000,000 animals [Meat & Livestock Commission statistic] were slaughtered but that did not include lambs at foot, aborted lambs, calves or piglets. Further, tens of thousands of chickens were slaughtered in the early months — on welfare grounds, apparently. 88% of all animals slaughtered had not contracted FMD [source: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs]. Great Orton airfield was used to slaughter sheep under the “voluntary” cull: that was anything but voluntary, and farmers not participating were ruthlessly threatened. There was only one mild case of FMD recorded from the thousands of blood tests done at Great Orton [source: DEFRA]. There was a travelator that ran from the slaughter tent at Great Orton to the graves. This ran 16 hours a day, transporting “dead” young lambs. Slaughtermen working there told me that many of the lambs were buried alive. The man that advised Blair during this fiasco was, as many will know, Prof. Ferguson of Imperial College. He was [reportedly] sacked by DEFRA late on during the epidemic, but the damage had been done! Prof Ferguson was awarded an OBE in 2002 for his work during FMD 2001.” [Emphasis added]
In 2002, Ferguson predicted that up to 50,000 people would die from variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, better known as “mad cow disease”, increasing to 150,000 if the epidemic expanded to include sheep. The reality is: “Since 1990, 178 people in the United Kingdom have died from vCJD, according to the National CJD Research & Surveillance Unit at the University of Edinburgh.” (2017)
In 2005, Ferguson claimed that up to 200 million people would be killed by bird-flu or H5N1. By early 2006, the WHO had only linked 78 deaths to the virus, out of 147 reported cases.
In 2009, Ferguson and his team at Imperial College advised the government that swine flu or H1N1 would probably kill 65,000 people in the UK. In the end, swine flu claimed the lives of 457 people in the UK.
Now, in 2020, Ferguson and Imperial College have released a report which claims that half a million Britons and 2.2 million Americans may be killed by Covid–19. The report has still not been peer-reviewed; despite this and Ferguson’s glaring record of mathematical sensationalism, the British Government has adopted the devastating socio-economic lockdown that Ferguson has proposed.
Why is the British Government so quick to follow Ferguson’s plan?
1. GAVI and Imperial College
The VIMC is hosted by the Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology at Imperial College. VIMC is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and by “GAVI, the vaccine alliance” (GAVI’s own title for itself). Bill and Melinda Gates began funding Imperial College in 2006, four years before the Gates Foundation launched the Global Health Leaders Launch Decade of Vaccines Collaboration (GHLLDVC) and one year after Ferguson had demonstrated his penchant for overblown projections on mortality numbers from H5N1.
Up to the end of 2018, the Gates Foundation has sponsored Imperial College with a whopping $185 million. That makes Gates the second largest sponsor, beaten to the top spot on the podium by the Wellcome Trust, a British research charity which began funding Imperial College prior to Ferguson’s FMD débâcle and which, by the end of 2018, had already provided Imperial with over $400 million in funding. I will examine the Wellcome Trust’s connections in part two of this series.
The Gates Foundation established the GHLLDVC in collaboration with the WHO, UNICEF and the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). The following is taken from the Gates Foundation website:
The Global Vaccine Action Plan will enable greater coordination across all stakeholder groups – national governments, multilateral organizations, civil society, the private sector and philanthropic organizations — and will identify critical policy, resource, and other gaps that must be addressed to realize the life-saving potential of vaccines.
The Collaboration’s leadership council at the time included the Director-General of the WHO, the Director of NIAID, the Director of UNICEF, the President of Gates Foundation Global Health, and the Chair of the African Malaria Alliance. The steering committee included the Director of Immunisation, the UK Department of Health, and many other representatives from the WHO, UNICEF and associated organisations. It is a cluster of immunisation-focused individuals controlling the policy of world health governing bodies, who claim to be neutral.
The WHO was nominated as the “directing and coordinating authority on international health within the United Nations system” and was set up to be responsible for “shaping the health research agenda”, among other tasks linked to the policy of global immunisation.
UNICEF, the “world’s largest provider of vaccines for developing countries” has on-the-ground access to children in over 150 territories and countries (2010).
We are already seeing the potential for some serious conflict of interest behind the Ferguson model on Covid–19, and this will become even more apparent as the connections are now made to an entire pharmaceutical complex potentially protecting its own interests over any genuine concerns for the health and welfare of global populations.
Gavi, the vaccine alliance
GAVI is funded and partnered by the same network that forms the GHLLDVC, with some noticeable additions: the World Bank and donor/implementing country governments. The Gates Foundation is a primary sponsor, but is topped by the British Government, which was instrumental in creating GAVI and is its largest donor.
While many sectors of British society have seen their living standards plummet, with the elderly severely neglected, a National Health Service in decline and homelessness on the increase, the British Government, via UKAID, has pledged £1.44 billion to GAVI for 2016–2020 and will be hosting the 2020 GAVI pledging conference, which is due to take place in June 2020 to “mobilise at least US$ 7.4 billion in additional resources to protect the next generation with vaccines, reduce disease inequality and create a healthier, safer and more prosperous world.” (Emphasis added)
The conference promises to bring together political leaders, civil society, public and private donors, vaccine manufacturers and governments to support GAVI, the vaccine alliance — which boasts that it has “helped vaccinate almost half the world’s children against deadly and debilitating infectious diseases”. This claim will be met with praise from the pro-vaccine lobby but concerns over the efficacy and safety of these mass vaccination programmes must be taken into account, particularly when being tested in poorer, developing countries.
Global vaccination market revenue worldwide is projected to reach $59.2 billion by 2020; this number may well increase with the arrival of Covid–19. The British Government’s investment in GAVI alongside vaccine promoter Bill Gates must, again, raise the issue of conflicts of interest. To what extent is the British Government protecting its own assets in forcing the lockdown upon its population? Vaccines are set to be a major source of income for the world’s largest pharmaceutical corporations, and the British Government is invested in that lucrative future.
The GAVI replenishment conference is to be hosted by a British Government whose lockdown policy is effectively shattering the domestic economy and is collectively punishing the most vulnerable in British society.
When Bill Gates partnered with GAVI twenty years ago, he had been considering where next to focus his philanthropy and was “increasingly focusing on the power and potential of vaccines”. It was Gates’ substantial sponsorship that launched GAVI, and ten years later Gates launched his own “vaccine decade” plan for the 2010s.
The Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP) 2012–2020, endorsed by the 194 member states participating in the World Health Assembly (2012), is led by the same members of the Gates “vaccine decade” consortium, promoted by the WHO, and brings together governments, elected officials, health professionals, academia, manufacturers, global agencies, research and development, civil society, media and the private sector — to promote global immunisation. This is a profit-driven corporate complex harnessing the “humanitarian” sector to lend credence to the claims of philanthropy, or more realistically, philanthrocapitalism.
2. GAVI and ID2020
A glance at the partner page of the GAVI website reveals that not only is GAVI heavily invested in immunisation campaigns, it is also closely connected to the Gates, Microsoft and Rockefeller Foundation seed-funded ID2020 project (Digital Identity Alliance), which incorporates Accenture, Microsoft (Gates), Ideo-Org and Rockefeller Foundation into the GAVI alliance, all with ties to the ID2020 initiative.
ID2020 is promoting the concept that there is a need for universal biometric verification, because “to prove who you are is a fundamental and universal human right,” as asserted on the ID2020 website. An article by journalist Kurt Nimmo for Global Research dismantles the “humanitarian” alibi for tyranny.
OffGrid Healthcare explains:
What they really want is a fully standardized data collection and retrieval format, and cross-border sharing of identities of the entire population of the planet, in order for the stand-alone AI-powered command center to work without a hitch, and for purposes of calculating everyone’s potential contribution, and threat, to the system.
Nimmo describes the potential for Covid–19 to be used as cover for mandatory biometric ID. An April article carried by Reuters confirms the suspicion that biometric ID might soon be introduced, ostensibly to “help verify those who already had the infection and ensure the vulnerable get the vaccine when it is launched”. This may sound perfectly sensible to those who are buying the government strap-lines on Covid–19 but — as Nimmo warns us — “COVID–19 is the perfect Trojan horse for a control freak state itching to not only micromanage the lives of ordinary citizens but also ferret out critics and potential adversaries and punish them as enemies of the state.”
Prashant Yadav, senior fellow at the US-based Center for Global Development, has said:
Biometric IDs can be a gamechanger. They can help governments target population segments, e.g healthcare professionals or the elderly population, verify people who have received vaccination, and have a clear record. [Emphasis added]
Such statements can easily be interpreted as the harbingers of mandatory vaccination and the inclusion of biometric ID in the “humanitarian” package.
Martin Armstrong of Armstrong Technologies introduces an even more sinister projection into the mix. Armstrong talks about a digital certificate that verifies you have been vaccinated, developed by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Microsoft, which will merge with ID2020. Covid–19 will be exploited to encourage us to accept digital implants and tracking devices that will enable authorities to keep an eye on us. Armstrong argues that just as 9/11 conditioned us to accept X-ray booths at airports, now we will be chipped alongside our dogs and cats.
At this point, it is worth remembering that UKAID is heavily involved in GAVI, and one presumes they are on board with the digital ID2020 project. Rob Laurence, director at UK-based Innovate Identity, presented proposals for the future of digital identity back in June 2019. The UK Government Verify scheme was identified as a fledgling version of the future of digital ID.
Laurence describes the digital ID “ecosystem” that is emerging: Oliver Dowden, Minister for Implementation at the Cabinet Office (the British Government’s co-ordinating department), will form a new Digital ID Unit to “pave the way for the government to consume digital identities from the private sector”. Laurence describes 2020 as the “now-or-never year for government and industry to collaborate” in the creation of an “interoperable digital identity market”.
Covid19 provides the opportunity that might just fulfil these predictions.
It is no coincidence that a British start-up — Microsoft-funded Onfido — has recently raised $100 million to “boost its ID technology” to enable the creation of “immunity passports” for governments “battling coronavirus”.
In December 2019, researchers at MIT created a “microneedle platform using fluorescent microparticles called quantum dots (QD) which can deliver vaccines and, at the same time, invisibly encode vaccination history in the skin”: the QDs can be detected by specially adapted smartphones. The “new normal” will mean we are tracked and monitored by our own communication systems to an even greater and more intrusive extent.
The future is being modelled — but not for our benefit
In part one of this two-part series, my intention has been to raise questions over who is driving the British Government response to Covid–19. Those who have influenced the lockdown policy have very clear conflict of interest question marks over their agenda.
The scientific clique influencing government decisions is one that is incorporated into a for-profit Big Pharma industrial network which will, undeniably, benefit from the measures being taken by the British Government — a government that is financially embedded in the same complex.
Why are the views of epidemiologists, doctors, scientists, analysts and health advisors who challenge the lockdown being ignored or censored by the media and by government? Why is the government not widening the circle of advisors to take into account these opposing perspectives that might bring an end to the misery that is a consequence of enforced quarantine? Off-Guardian has recorded these views here, here and here. It is also worth following Swiss Propaganda Research for regular updates on emerging analysis and statistics that you will not always find in the mainstream media.
Instead, the British Government is effectively endorsing the breeding of distrust in society, the erosion of public assembly, the isolation and state-sanctioned euthanasia of the elderly, the emerging police state, snitch lines, loss of dignity and livelihoods, greater dependency upon the state for survival, depression, suicide and voluntary incarceration.
The UN has issued a warning that the economic downturn could “kill hundreds of thousands of children in 2020”. Gates, the WHO, the British Government and UNICEF are focused on global immunisation for a “pandemic” that is not living up to the alarmist virtual projections sponsored by Gates and the Big Pharma complex, while children really will start to die from malnutrition, neglect and a myriad of consequence of extreme poverty generated by the “steepest downturn since the Great Depression of the 1930s” (IMF).
In part two, I will delve deeper into the interlocking interests of state and private corporate sectors that should not be interfering in policies which affect the welfare of British citizens. I will reveal how the same players are influencing the media response and ensuring that their interests are given the most powerful platforms to promote their agenda.
The questions must be asked: Who is really in charge of the Covid–19 response? Who benefits most? Who will suffer most from the long term consequences? And who will provide respite from those consequences when the “pandemic” has disappeared from view?
************
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com


thelibertybeacon--2020-04-24--HATING HOMESCHOOLERS AT … HARVARD

HATING HOMESCHOOLERS AT … HARVARD

If people are allowed to leave their homes by June , the scolds at Harvard will be hosting a private , by-invitation-only conference examining the prospects for locking homeschoolers out of their in-house classrooms .
Organizers are contending that parents teaching their own children pose “ problems of educational deprivation and child maltreatment that too often occur under the guise of homeschooling.
” Project 21 member Rich Holt , who homeschools his two kids , begs to differ .
And this black conservative is taking on their assumptions of inherent racism , sexism and religious extremism with his own experience @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even Harvard admissions officers understand the value of a good homeschooled student .
As first reported by the Daily Caller , Harvard Law School ’ s Child Advocacy Program ( CAP ) is set to play host to the “ Homeschooling Summit : Politics , Problems and Prospects for Reform ” on June 18 and 19 .
Under the guise of “ child rights , ” selected scholars will come to the private institution to hear from the likes of conference co-organizer Elizabeth Bartholet – a Harvard Law professor and director of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about parents who choose themselves over schools to teach their children .
In a paper suggested as advance reading for summit attendees , she calls homeschooling a “ threat… to children and society.
” Homeschooling parents , she contends , “ want to isolate their children , ” “ promote racial segregation and female subservience ” and “ keep their children from exposure to views that might enable choice about their future lives.
” Harvard Magazine , highlighting Bartholet ’ s work , also quoted her saying that she wants kids to “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ social values , democratic values , ideas about nondiscrimination and tolerance of other people ’ s viewpoints.
” Parents apparently can not be trusted to raise good citizens .
But that ’ s not a stretch for someone who has suggested a “ presumptive ban ” on homeschooling .
And her very strong feelings are in spite of the fact that Harvard has sought out homeschoolers .
Education expert Dr. Susan Berry told Alpha Omega in 2013 that “ Schools such as Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Harvard , Stanford , and Duke @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a 2017 Harvard Crimson article , Harvard Dean of Freshmen Thomas A. Dingman said , “ We ’ ve had lots of success with students who identify as homeschooled.
” At this time , it ’ s unclear if anyone from the Harvard admissions office will be attending the law school ’ s conference to offer a dissenting opinion on the value of homeschooling .
But Rich would like to offer one !
Not only has he found success in learning , but he also says that his homeschooled kids are more independent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by-product of not being in a traditional classroom under the heavy hand of teachers .
Rich says : Leave it to a liberal to solve our nation ’ s educational woes by ending a private plan that ’ s working in favor of a public plan that isn ’ t .
Homeschoolers are sought after by major universities for a reason .
They are more ready for college than their peers , better adaptable to the diversity on campus and excel in their studies .
Homeschoolers are a national treasure .
Their quality @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the most capable and talented students in the nation .
Only leftist demagogues like those in the Ivy League would seek to distance a family ’ s natural right to educate their young .
It ’ s only more ironic because Harvard is itself trying to admit homeschooling students , knowing these students are best prepared for the rigors of the workload at its university .
The sad reality is that these leftists don ’ t care about the education of America ’ s youth .
They only care about what they get @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of mechanized schooling .
Through 13 long years of indoctrination , the pupil is deprived of critical thinking .
She is put into an environment where she is forced to face forward , be quiet and repeat what the teacher says she needs to know .
If she whispers to a peer next to her – as children do – she is punished .
If she asks a question , she ’ s told what to think .
If she dares to challenge the assumption of the government agent , she is quickly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t need less homeschooling .
We need more .
In the home environment , a student is free to ask questions .
The student is rewarded for creativity , for asking questions and for daring to think differently .
In the school , this student sits in detention .
In the homeschool , this student uses her curiosity to do a science project .
In the school , a student is punished for speaking to her neighbor .
In the homeschool , social time is a part of the day and highly encouraged @ @ @ @ @ @ @ schools are slavery .
Public schools are made to create good drones for a heartless society that needs more cogs in the machine – not people who ask questions .
The public school is an institution whose only true value is in the deprivation of the growth of the human spirit .
This government institution seeks not to challenge a student to grow , but to thwart that growth at every corner .
The public school fights against the very soul of the American identity .
To the liberal , might makes right @ @ @ @ @ @ @ well , we punch the bully in the nose .
And liberals just can ’ t have that kind of thinking in their oppressive Utopian ideal .
Project 21 , a leading voice of black conservatives for over 25 years , is sponsored by the National Center for Public Policy Research .
Its members have been quoted , interviewed or published over 40,000 times since the program was created in 1992 .
Contributions to the National Center are tax-deductible and greatly appreciated , and may be earmarked exclusively for the use of Project @ @ @ @ @ @ @ National Center for Public Policy Research is a non-partisan , free-market , independent conservative think-tank .
Ninety-four percent of its support comes from some 60,000 individuals , less than four percent from foundations and less than two percent from corporations .
Sign up for email updates here .
Follow Project 21 on Twitter at @ Project21News for general announcements .
To be alerted to upcoming media appearances by Project 21 members , follow our media Twitter at @ NCPPRMedia .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

HATING HOMESCHOOLERS AT HARVARD
By: David Almasi
If people are allowed to leave their homes by June, the scolds at Harvard will be hosting a private, by-invitation-only conference examining the prospects for locking homeschoolers out of their in-house classrooms. Organizers are contending that parents teaching their own children pose “problems of educational deprivation and child maltreatment that too often occur under the guise of homeschooling.”
Project 21 member Rich Holt, who homeschools his two kids, begs to differ. And this black conservative is taking on their assumptions of inherent racism, sexism and religious extremism with his own experience and the simple, telling fact that even Harvard admissions officers understand the value of a good homeschooled student.
As first reported by the Daily Caller, Harvard Law School’s Child Advocacy Program (CAP) is set to play host to the “Homeschooling Summit: Politics, Problems and Prospects for Reform” on June 18 and 19. Under the guise of “child rights,” selected scholars will come to the private institution to hear from the likes of conference co-organizer Elizabeth Bartholet – a Harvard Law professor and director of the CAP.
Bartholet has decidedly negative opinions about parents who choose themselves over schools to teach their children. In a paper suggested as advance reading for summit attendees, she calls homeschooling a “threat… to children and society.” Homeschooling parents, she contends, “want to isolate their children,” “promote racial segregation and female subservience” and “keep their children from exposure to views that might enable choice about their future lives.”
Harvard Magazine, highlighting Bartholet’s work, also quoted her saying that she wants kids to “grow up exposed to community values, social values, democratic values, ideas about nondiscrimination and tolerance of other people’s viewpoints.” Parents apparently cannot be trusted to raise good citizens. But that’s not a stretch for someone who has suggested a “presumptive ban” on homeschooling.
And her very strong feelings are in spite of the fact that Harvard has sought out homeschoolers. Education expert Dr. Susan Berry told Alpha Omega in 2013 that “Schools such as Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard, Stanford, and Duke University all actively recruit homeschoolers.” In a 2017 Harvard Crimson article, Harvard Dean of Freshmen Thomas A. Dingman said, “We’ve had lots of success with students who identify as homeschooled.”
At this time, it’s unclear if anyone from the Harvard admissions office will be attending the law school’s conference to offer a dissenting opinion on the value of homeschooling.
But Rich would like to offer one! Not only has he found success in learning, but he also says that his homeschooled kids are more independent in their thoughts and actions as a by-product of not being in a traditional classroom under the heavy hand of teachers. Rich says:
Leave it to a liberal to solve our nation’s educational woes by ending a private plan that’s working in favor of a public plan that isn’t. Homeschoolers are sought after by major universities for a reason. They are more ready for college than their peers, better adaptable to the diversity on campus and excel in their studies. Homeschoolers are a national treasure. Their quality of education and upbringing make them among the most capable and talented students in the nation. Only leftist demagogues like those in the Ivy League would seek to distance a family’s natural right to educate their young. It’s only more ironic because Harvard is itself trying to admit homeschooling students, knowing these students are best prepared for the rigors of the workload at its university. The sad reality is that these leftists don’t care about the education of America’s youth. They only care about what they get to put in their heads over years of mechanized schooling. Through 13 long years of indoctrination, the pupil is deprived of critical thinking. She is put into an environment where she is forced to face forward, be quiet and repeat what the teacher says she needs to know. If she whispers to a peer next to her – as children do – she is punished. If she asks a question, she’s told what to think. If she dares to challenge the assumption of the government agent, she is quickly ridiculed or punished. We don’t need less homeschooling. We need more. In the home environment, a student is free to ask questions. The student is rewarded for creativity, for asking questions and for daring to think differently. In the school, this student sits in detention. In the homeschool, this student uses her curiosity to do a science project. In the school, a student is punished for speaking to her neighbor. In the homeschool, social time is a part of the day and highly encouraged. As I see it, public schools are slavery. Public schools are made to create good drones for a heartless society that needs more cogs in the machine – not people who ask questions. The public school is an institution whose only true value is in the deprivation of the growth of the human spirit. This government institution seeks not to challenge a student to grow, but to thwart that growth at every corner. The public school fights against the very soul of the American identity. To the liberal, might makes right. But, to the conservative – well, we punch the bully in the nose. And liberals just can’t have that kind of thinking in their oppressive Utopian ideal.
••••
To schedule an interview with a member of Project 21, contact Judy Kent at (703) 759-0269.
BLACK LEADERSHIP NETWORK
Project 21, a leading voice of black conservatives for over 25 years, is sponsored by the National Center for Public Policy Research. Its members have been quoted, interviewed or published over 40,000 times since the program was created in 1992. Contributions to the National Center are tax-deductible and greatly appreciated, and may be earmarked exclusively for the use of Project 21. Founded in 1982, the National Center for Public Policy Research is a non-partisan, free-market, independent conservative think-tank. Ninety-four percent of its support comes from some 60,000 individuals, less than four percent from foundations and less than two percent from corporations. Sign up for email updates here. Follow Project 21 on Twitter at @Project21News for general announcements. To be alerted to upcoming media appearances by Project 21 members, follow our media Twitter at @NCPPRMedia.
••••
This above article (HATING HOMESCHOOLERS AT HARVARD) was originally created and published by Project 21 and is republished here with permission and with attribution to the author David Almasi and nationalcenter.org/project21/
••••
Read more great articles by David Almasi
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-04-24--COVID-19 fraud: Researcher Jim West rides again [A Jon Rappoport report]

I became aware of Jim West ’ s work back in the day of the West Nile fake epidemic .
Jim was documenting the destructive effects of air pollution in the areas where the virus was said to be causing harm .
He ’ s doing it again , now , in the case of COVID .
His latest blog post is titled “ COVID Pandemic 2020 : Environment Omitted ” .
Here are two key Jim West quotes : “ Air pollution correlates with COVID-19 epicenters .
The only pollutant that could have a worldwide timeline correlation with these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its global implementation timing and toxicity dependent upon its formulation .
Apparently new toxics were added to fracked fuel directly or by relaxing the rules for cleaning fracked ‘ natural ’ gas .
Fracked fuel exhaust , toxic earth gas vapors , and epidemic locations correlate with the record-high measles epidemics of 2019 and the present COVID-19 epidemics.
” “ New Orleans has the highest [ so-called “ COVID ” ] death incidence in the US , at 38 , and is adjacent the largest petrochemical industrial region of the US .
New @ @ @ @ @ @ @ death incidence of 32 , and is adjacent the second largest petrochemical region in the US.
” Since 1987 , I ’ ve been writing about the use of THE VIRUS as a successful cover story , launched to obscure corporate and government crimes that harm health and kill large numbers of people .
Public awareness of covert ops and cover stories is widening—particular in light of the blizzard of lies surrounding the “ pandemic.
” The CDC , through its Epidemic Intelligence Service , and the World Health Organization , routinely send @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to explain away environmental crimes with highly arcane gibberish about germs .
These organizations front for pharma , other types of major corporations , and governments—all intent on concealing their crimes against populations .
This time , with COVID , the op goes much farther .
Its aim is the creation of a new civilization , ruled by technocrats , who are using the false propaganda notion of a “ spreading virus ” to insist on global governance ; only then , they say , can we coordinate epidemic responses early enough to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re all in this together.
” Translation : If you buy fake love and fake share and care—as opposed to the real thing—you ’ re in the mind control bubble where following all official orders turns you into a sincere pod person—to be controlled and sacrificed on the altar of a New World Order .
Yes , Virginia , the NWO is real .
It ’ s a cheery marshmallow with a poisoned core .
Here is an illustration of a prime-cut A-number-one cover story , from 2003—SARS , the great epidemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Organization , was gripping planet Earth .
In the end , WHO listed the death total as : 800 .
On a planet of 6.3 billion people .
Where did SARS begin ?
Where was it first found ?
Guangdong , China .
In their excellent book , Virus Mania , Torsten Engelbrecht and Claus Kohnlein explore non-virus causes of flu-like illness in that locale .
They found causes .
It turns out this area is one of the world ’ s largest re-cyclers of e-waste : “ Guangdong is China ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ everywhere ; above all high-tech waste…For $ 1.50 a day , locals disassemble computers , monitors and printers with their bare hands , endangering both their own health and the environment… There , workers empty toner cartridges from laser printers the whole day long without protective masks , breathing in fine carbon dust .
Others , mostly women and girls , dip circuit boards into baths of liquid lead to separate and collect the soldering materials with which the memory chips and processors are attached to the plates .
Unprotected , they are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ plastic plates are simply burned up , the chips and processors are put in acid baths , to extract their gold .
Here as well , poisonous fumes are generated , and the unusable leftover acids are just dumped into the river .
A lot of garbage is simply burned up or dumped onto rice fields , irrigation facilities or into waterways .
The bodies of water and groundwater around Guiys have become so contaminated that drinking water has to be brought in daily from other cities… ” A real cause of real @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Except…as a cover story .
A Vital Paper : David Crowe challenges the discovery of the COVID-19 virus ( TLB ) published this original article from the blog of Jon Rappoport with our appreciation for his contribution to raise health and freedom awareness .
Jon Rappoport is the author of three explosive collections , THE MATRIX REVEALED , EXIT FROM THE MATRIX , and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX , Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California .
He maintains a consulting practice for private @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the expansion of personal creative power .
Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize , he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years , writing articles on politics , medicine , and health for CBS Healthwatch , LA Weekly , Spin Magazine , Stern , and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe .
Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics , health , logic , and creative power to audiences around the world .
You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

COVID-19 fraud: Researcher Jim West rides again
Jon Rappoport
I became aware of Jim West’s work back in the day of the West Nile fake epidemic. Jim was documenting the destructive effects of air pollution in the areas where the virus was said to be causing harm.
He’s doing it again, now, in the case of COVID. His latest blog post is titled “COVID Pandemic 2020: Environment Omitted”.
Here are two key Jim West quotes:
“Air pollution correlates with COVID-19 epicenters. The only pollutant that could have a worldwide timeline correlation with these coinciding epidemics would be fracking fuel, its global implementation timing and toxicity dependent upon its formulation. Apparently new toxics were added to fracked fuel directly or by relaxing the rules for cleaning fracked ‘natural’ gas. Fracked fuel exhaust, toxic earth gas vapors, and epidemic locations correlate with the record-high measles epidemics of 2019 and the present COVID-19 epidemics.”
“New Orleans has the highest [so-called “COVID”] death incidence in the US, at 38, and is adjacent the largest petrochemical industrial region of the US. New York City is next, with a death incidence of 32, and is adjacent the second largest petrochemical region in the US.”
Jim emphasizes that his research on air pollution and “COVID” is ongoing, and he’ll be expanding and adjusting that work as he discovers new information.
___
Since 1987, I’ve been writing about the use of THE VIRUS as a successful cover story, launched to obscure corporate and government crimes that harm health and kill large numbers of people.
Public awareness of covert ops and cover stories is widening—particular in light of the blizzard of lies surrounding the “pandemic.”
The CDC, through its Epidemic Intelligence Service, and the World Health Organization, routinely send their virus hunters out into the field to explain away environmental crimes with highly arcane gibberish about germs. These organizations front for pharma, other types of major corporations, and governments—all intent on concealing their crimes against populations.
This time, with COVID, the op goes much farther. Its aim is the creation of a new civilization, ruled by technocrats, who are using the false propaganda notion of a “spreading virus” to insist on global governance; only then, they say, can we coordinate epidemic responses early enough to head off worldwide disasters.
“We’re all in this together.”
Translation: If you buy fake love and fake share and care—as opposed to the real thing—you’re in the mind control bubble where following all official orders turns you into a sincere pod person—to be controlled and sacrificed on the altar of a New World Order.
Yes, Virginia, the NWO is real. It’s a cheery marshmallow with a poisoned core.
Here is an illustration of a prime-cut A-number-one cover story, from 2003—SARS, the great epidemic that, according to the World Health Organization, was gripping planet Earth. In the end, WHO listed the death total as: 800. On a planet of 6.3 billion people.
Where did SARS begin? Where was it first found? Guangdong, China. In their excellent book, Virus Mania, Torsten Engelbrecht and Claus Kohnlein explore non-virus causes of flu-like illness in that locale. They found causes. It turns out this area is one of the world’s largest re-cyclers of e-waste:
“Guangdong is China’s largest industrial area…extremely polluted. Garbage lies everywhere; above all high-tech waste…For $1.50 a day, locals disassemble computers, monitors and printers with their bare hands, endangering both their own health and the environment… There, workers empty toner cartridges from laser printers the whole day long without protective masks, breathing in fine carbon dust. Others, mostly women and girls, dip circuit boards into baths of liquid lead to separate and collect the soldering materials with which the memory chips and processors are attached to the plates. Unprotected, they are exposed to toxic fumes. While the plastic plates are simply burned up, the chips and processors are put in acid baths, to extract their gold. Here as well, poisonous fumes are generated, and the unusable leftover acids are just dumped into the river. A lot of garbage is simply burned up or dumped onto rice fields, irrigation facilities or into waterways. The bodies of water and groundwater around Guiys have become so contaminated that drinking water has to be brought in daily from other cities…”
A real cause of real illness. No need for a virus. Except…as a cover story.
_________
More from Jon Rappoport
*********
(TLB) published this original article from the blog of Jon Rappoport with our appreciation for his contribution to raise health and freedom awareness.
Jon Rappoport is the author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-04-24--The Bill Gates Effect: WHO’s DTP Vaccine Killed More Children in Africa Than the Diseases

The Bill Gates Effect : WHO ’ s DTP Vaccine Killed More Children in Africa Than the Diseases it Targeted Anyone defending the Bill Gates/WHO global vaccine program needs to explain this study : Mogensen et al 2017 .
Prior to 2017 , neither HHS nor WHO ever performed the kind of vaccinated/unvaccinated ( or placebo ) study necessary to ascertain if the DTP vaccine actually yields beneficial health outcomes .
The DTP vaccine was discontinued in the US and western nations in the 1990s following thousands of reports of death and brain damage .
But Bill Gates and his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ DTP a priority for African babies .
The Danish government and Novo Nordisk Foundation commissioned this study by a team of the world ’ s leading experts on African vaccination .
The two most prominent names , Drs .
Soren Mogensen and Peter Aaby , are both vocal vaccine supporters .
They were shocked when they examined years of data from a so called “ natural experiment ” in Guinea Bissau where 50 % of children die before age five .
In that west African nation , half the children were vaccinated with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the other half at six months .
Dr. Mogenson and his team found that girls vaccinated with the DTP vaccine died at 10 times the rate of unvaccinated kids .
While the vaccinated children were protected from Diphtheria , Tetanus and Pertussis , they were far more susceptible to other deadly diseases than unvaccinated peers .
The vaccine apparently compromised their immune systems .
Thanks to Gates , DTP is the world ’ s most popular vaccine .
For African nations , GAVI and WHO use DTP vaccine uptake to gauge national compliance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ punish nations that don ’ t fully comply .
The researchers suggested that the DTP vaccine is killing more children than the diseases it targets .
It ’ s possible that millions of children are adversely affected .
Although the New York Times and other Gates boosters will accuse me of promoting “ vaccine misinformation ” , this is a peer reviewed publication in a respected journal by the world ’ s most authoritative vaccine scientists describing catastrophic outcomes .
Shouldn ’ t we be scrutinizing Bill Gates ’ record in Africa before @ @ @ @ @ @ @ need to take ?
By muzzling legitimate criticism as “ anti-vax ” , the media avoids honest debate on many damning studies like Mogensen .
About Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. – His reputation as a resolute defender of the environment stems from a litany of successful legal actions .
Mr. Kennedy was named one of Time magazine ’ s “ Heroes for the Planet ” for his success helping Riverkeeper lead the fight to restore the Hudson River .
The group ’ s achievement helped spawn 300 Waterkeeper organizations across the globe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the Natural Resources Defense Council , Chief Prosecuting Attorney for the Hudson Riverkeeper and President of Waterkeeper Alliance .
He is also a Clinical Professor and Supervising Attorney at Pace University School of Law ’ s Environmental Litigation Clinic and is of counsel to Morgan & Morgan , a nationwide personal injury practice .
He is co-host of Ring of Fire on Air America Radio .
Earlier in his career he served as Assistant District Attorney in New York City .
He has worked on environmental issues across the Americas and has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Canada in successfully negotiating treaties protecting traditional homelands .
He is credited with leading the fight to protect New York City ’ s water supply .
The New York City watershed agreement , which he negotiated on behalf of environmentalists and New York City watershed consumers , is regarded as an international model in stakeholder consensus negotiations and sustainable development .
Mr. Kennedy is also a devout proponent for vaccine rights , the right to chose , informed consent , and the publication and public awareness of information needed by parents to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vulnerable children .
A large portion of his related works can be found on the Children ’ s Health Defense website Read more Children ’ s Health Defense articles by RFK , JR. here TLB Editors Note : This is World Mercury Project on steroids !
TLB highly recommends you click on the image below , visit this great website , and do whatever you can to help see this vital forum succeed … for the sake of our children !
!
!
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s Health Defense .
CHD is planning many strategies , including legal , in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured .
Your support is essential to CHD ’ s successful mission .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use @ @ @ @ @ @ @ better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

The Bill Gates Effect: WHO’s DTP Vaccine Killed More Children in Africa Than the Diseases it Targeted
By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Chairman, Children’s Health Defense
Anyone defending the Bill Gates/WHO global vaccine program needs to explain this study: Mogensen et al 2017. Prior to 2017, neither HHS nor WHO ever performed the kind of vaccinated/unvaccinated (or placebo) study necessary to ascertain if the DTP vaccine actually yields beneficial health outcomes. The DTP vaccine was discontinued in the US and western nations in the 1990s following thousands of reports of death and brain damage.
… girls vaccinated with the DTP vaccine—the flagship of Bill Gates’s GAVI/WHO African vaccine program—died at 10 times the rate of unvaccinated kids. … girls vaccinated with the DTP vaccine—the flagship of Bill Gates’s GAVI/WHO African vaccine program—died at 10 times the rate of unvaccinated kids.
But Bill Gates and his surrogates, GAVI and WHO, made DTP a priority for African babies. The Danish government and Novo Nordisk Foundation commissioned this study by a team of the world’s leading experts on African vaccination. The two most prominent names, Drs. Soren Mogensen and Peter Aaby, are both vocal vaccine supporters. They were shocked when they examined years of data from a so called “natural experiment” in Guinea Bissau where 50% of children die before age five. In that west African nation, half the children were vaccinated with the DTP vaccine at three months and the other half at six months.
Dr. Mogenson and his team found that girls vaccinated with the DTP vaccine died at 10 times the rate of unvaccinated kids. While the vaccinated children were protected from Diphtheria, Tetanus and Pertussis, they were far more susceptible to other deadly diseases than unvaccinated peers. The vaccine apparently compromised their immune systems. Thanks to Gates, DTP is the world’s most popular vaccine.
The researchers suggested that the DTP vaccine is killing more children than the diseases it targets. The researchers suggested that the DTP vaccine is killing more children than the diseases it targets.
For African nations, GAVI and WHO use DTP vaccine uptake to gauge national compliance with vaccine recommendations. GAVI can financially punish nations that don’t fully comply. The researchers suggested that the DTP vaccine is killing more children than the diseases it targets. It’s possible that millions of children are adversely affected. Although the New York Times and other Gates boosters will accuse me of promoting “vaccine misinformation”, this is a peer reviewed publication in a respected journal by the world’s most authoritative vaccine scientists describing catastrophic outcomes.
Shouldn’t we be scrutinizing Bill Gates’ record in Africa before we let him dictate which medicines we need to take? By muzzling legitimate criticism as “anti-vax”, the media avoids honest debate on many damning studies like Mogensen.
••••
About Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. – His reputation as a resolute defender of the environment stems from a litany of successful legal actions. Mr. Kennedy was named one of Time magazine’s “Heroes for the Planet” for his success helping Riverkeeper lead the fight to restore the Hudson River. The group’s achievement helped spawn 300 Waterkeeper organizations across the globe. Mr. Kennedy serves as Senior Attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council, Chief Prosecuting Attorney for the Hudson Riverkeeper and President of Waterkeeper Alliance. He is also a Clinical Professor and Supervising Attorney at Pace University School of Law’s Environmental Litigation Clinic and is of counsel to Morgan & Morgan, a nationwide personal injury practice. He is co-host of Ring of Fire on Air America Radio. Earlier in his career he served as Assistant District Attorney in New York City. He has worked on environmental issues across the Americas and has assisted several indigenous tribes in Latin America and Canada in successfully negotiating treaties protecting traditional homelands. He is credited with leading the fight to protect New York City’s water supply. The New York City watershed agreement, which he negotiated on behalf of environmentalists and New York City watershed consumers, is regarded as an international model in stakeholder consensus negotiations and sustainable development. Mr. Kennedy is also a devout proponent for vaccine rights, the right to chose, informed consent, and the publication and public awareness of information needed by parents to make informed decisions for their much more vulnerable children. A large portion of his related works can be found on the Children’s Health Defense website
••••
Read more Children’s Health Defense articles by RFK, JR. here
••••
••••
TLB Editors Note: This is World Mercury Project on steroids! TLB highly recommends you click on the image below, visit this great website, and do whatever you can to help see this vital forum succeed … for the sake of our children !!! Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-04-24--Congress tells FCC to reverse ruling that allows 5G, or it will

By | Just the News Bipartisan leaders of two powerful congressional committees told the Federal Communications Commission to reverse a ruling allowing a Virginia company to activate a 5G network that could disrupt military and other GPS signals .
The leaders of the House and Senate Armed Services committees wrote in an appeal Wednesday that they would force the issue through legislation if the FCC does not overturn its own decision to allow Ligado Networks to implement a network on the L-band spectrum .
Ligado ’ s plan to use the L-band would risk interfering with signals that are important @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jim Inhofe and Jack Reed , along with Reps. Adam Smith and Mac Thornberry , who are the chairmen and ranking members of the two committees .
The four leaders noted that the country ’ s current most pressing concern is the coronavirus pandemic .
“ But the Federal Communications Commission has used the crisis , under the cover of darkness , to approve a long-stalled application by Ligado Networks – a proposal that threatens to undermine our global positioning system ( GPS ) capabilities , and with it , our national security @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proposal from Ligado is opposed by multiple U.S. agencies , the leaders also reminded the FCC .
“ The departments of Defense , Commerce , Interior , Justice , Homeland Security , Energy , and Transportation – as well as NASA , the National Science Foundation , the Coast Guard and the Federal Aviation Administration – all strongly object to Ligado ’ s plan.
” The committee leaders asked the FCC to cancel the Ligado ruling .
“ If they do not , and unless President Trump intervenes to stop this from moving @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it will be up to Congress to clean up this mess.
” ( TLB ) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News Some emphasis and pictorial content added by ( TLB ) About the author : Susan Katz Keating is Chief National Security Correspondent at Just the News .
[ Click Here ] to read her most recent articles .
About Just the News It ’ s mission can be succinctly summarized by three brand statements : Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright @ @ @ @ @ @ @ opinions shared are for informational purposes only including , but not limited to , text , graphics , images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction .
Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice , diagnosis or treatment .

Congress tells FCC to reverse ruling that allows 5G, threatens to disrupt military – or it will Pentagon and other agencies said plan could interfere with vital GPS signals.
Aerial View of U.S. Capitol Building (Public Domain)
By Susan Katz Keating | Just the News
Bipartisan leaders of two powerful congressional committees told the Federal Communications Commission to reverse a ruling allowing a Virginia company to activate a 5G network that could disrupt military and other GPS signals.
The leaders of the House and Senate Armed Services committees wrote in an appeal Wednesday that they would force the issue through legislation if the FCC does not overturn its own decision to allow Ligado Networks to implement a network on the L-band spectrum.
Ligado’s plan to use the L-band would risk interfering with signals that are important to national security, wrote Sens. Jim Inhofe and Jack Reed, along with Reps. Adam Smith and Mac Thornberry, who are the chairmen and ranking members of the two committees.
Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK), House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mac Thornberry (R-TX), House Armed Services Committee ranking member Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA) and Senate Armed Services Committee ranking member Sen. Jack Reed (D-RI) — Getty Images
The four leaders noted that the country’s current most pressing concern is the coronavirus pandemic. “But the Federal Communications Commission has used the crisis, under the cover of darkness, to approve a long-stalled application by Ligado Networks – a proposal that threatens to undermine our global positioning system (GPS) capabilities, and with it, our national security,” the leaders wrote. The proposal from Ligado is opposed by multiple U.S. agencies, the leaders also reminded the FCC. “The departments of Defense, Commerce, Interior, Justice, Homeland Security, Energy, and Transportation – as well as NASA, the National Science Foundation, the Coast Guard and the Federal Aviation Administration – all strongly object to Ligado’s plan.” The committee leaders asked the FCC to cancel the Ligado ruling. “If they do not, and unless President Trump intervenes to stop this from moving forward,” they wrote, “it will be up to Congress to clean up this mess.” ********* (TLB) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News Some emphasis and pictorial content added by (TLB) About the author: Susan Katz Keating is Chief National Security Correspondent at Just the News. [Click Here] to read her most recent articles. About Just the News It’s mission can be succinctly summarized by three brand statements: Honest Journalism, Trusted Reporters
Information Without Indoctrination
Rising Above Rhetoric Read more… Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News •••• •••• Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.