thelibertybeacon--2020-05-31--America Wakes Up After A Night Of Chaos And Destruction [Video]

America Wakes Up After A Night Of Chaos And Destruction A night of widespread social unrest unfolded across dozens of major US cities on Saturday night .
Violent clashes between protesters and police were seen , police vehicles and government buildings were lit on fire , businesses were also looted , and some were even torched following the death of George Floyd , a black man who died in police custody in Minneapolis on Monday ( May 25 ) .
What started as mostly peaceful protests in Minneapolis on Tuesday ( May 26 ) , quickly spiraled out of control @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this county has ever seen .
By Wednesday evening ( May 27 ) , peaceful demonstrations spread to other major US metros , and almost immediately , violence erupted in the streets , and communities were transformed into warzones in a matter of hours .
By Sunday ( May 31 ) — the nation is burning , it ’ s time for President Trump to address the country , and stop pretending how everything is awesome for election year purposes .
The nation , at the moment , is imploding , the economy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Floyd ’ s death was merely a trigger for the social unrest , as it is clear , the working-class poor ( experiencing the worst wealth gap in modern history ) are angry , broke , and jobless in the “ greatest economy ever , ” as their only hope to be heard is through rioting .
While burning businesses and harming human life is by no means a sufficient response to voice one ’ s frustrations of a failed system or a failed American social experiment that is quickly collapsing on itself @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many have taken in the last week .
The riots in Ferguson ( 2014 ) and Baltimore ( 2015 ) were just the appetizers of today ’ s social unrest , the full course meal has yet to come , although we could be in the early chapters of it .
As a result of the chaos , lockdowns are beginning , and this time not for virus-related reasons , as curfews were enacted in two dozen cities and National Guard has been activated in 12 states and the District of Columbia this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and federal level suggests the next card that the government could play is martial law or a variant form of it .
Most important riot headlines from the overnight : • Trump ’ s conservative media allies urge him to address the nation • Curfews enacted in two dozen major cities ; Los Angeles issues mandatory curfew for the entire city • One killed in Indianapolis in shooting amid protests • Denver police arrest 18 as demonstrations ease from the previous two nights An explosion was seen near the White House .
NYPD @ @ @ @ @ @ @ way .
Protester sings : “ I don ’ t know what y ’ all been told , this racist shit is getting old.
” The government ’ s attempt to thwart social unrest during an economic depression was the deployment of helicopter money , i.e.
, Trump stimulus checks , while that move has widely failed in the last week , the next card is already being played : activate the National Guard across the country .
Unrest will likely spill over into next week .
( TLB ) Editors note : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ expectations that “ this next Stimulus Check had better be a big one ” … or “ you ain ’ t seen any Unrest yet .
This here tonight is just a sample of what Trump will get.
” ( TLB ) edited and compiled this post from ZeroHedge , Twitter , Breitbart , BNO News , NighSide , and NBC LA .
Trump says military is ready to act The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

America Wakes Up After A Night Of Chaos And Destruction
1,700 Rioters Arrested In Three Days
(ZEROHEDGE)
A night of widespread social unrest unfolded across dozens of major US cities on Saturday night. Violent clashes between protesters and police were seen, police vehicles and government buildings were lit on fire, businesses were also looted, and some were even torched following the death of George Floyd, a black man who died in police custody in Minneapolis on Monday (May 25).
What started as mostly peaceful protests in Minneapolis on Tuesday (May 26), quickly spiraled out of control into some of the worst social unrest this county has ever seen. By Wednesday evening (May 27), peaceful demonstrations spread to other major US metros, and almost immediately, violence erupted in the streets, and communities were transformed into warzones in a matter of hours.
By Sunday (May 31) — the nation is burning, it’s time for President Trump to address the country, and stop pretending how everything is awesome for election year purposes.
The nation, at the moment, is imploding, the economy has crashed, 40 million unemployed, Floyd’s death was merely a trigger for the social unrest, as it is clear, the working-class poor (experiencing the worst wealth gap in modern history) are angry, broke, and jobless in the “greatest economy ever,” as their only hope to be heard is through rioting.
While burning businesses and harming human life is by no means a sufficient response to voice one’s frustrations of a failed system or a failed American social experiment that is quickly collapsing on itself, it has been the undeniable path many have taken in the last week.
The riots in Ferguson (2014) and Baltimore (2015) were just the appetizers of today’s social unrest, the full course meal has yet to come, although we could be in the early chapters of it.
As a result of the chaos, lockdowns are beginning, and this time not for virus-related reasons, as curfews were enacted in two dozen cities and National Guard has been activated in 12 states and the District of Columbia this weekend. Policy response on a state and federal level suggests the next card that the government could play is martial law or a variant form of it.
Most important riot headlines from the overnight:
Police arrest 1,700 people across 22 cities in 3 days
National Guard activated in 12 states
Trump’s conservative media allies urge him to address the nation
Target temporarily closes 175 stores in 13 states due to riots
Curfews enacted in two dozen major cities; Los Angeles issues mandatory curfew for the entire city
345 people arrested in NYC on Saturday, 33 officers injured
One killed in Indianapolis in shooting amid protests
Biden states protests urges understanding but cautions against “needless destruction”
28 arrested in Nashville during riots
Atlanta police arrest 70 people amid social unrest
Denver police arrest 18 as demonstrations ease from the previous two nights
Miami-Dade Police arrest 38 people, suspends all transit services on Sunday
Top riot scenes from the overnight:
(Breitbart)
An explosion was seen near the White House.
Developing from near the White House. pic.twitter.com/dcCNQmTfPd — Breitbart News (@BreitbartNews) May 31, 2020
(BNO News)
BREAKING: U.S. Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy activates D.C. National Guard to help maintain order near the White House pic.twitter.com/Jkaicv9rhB — BNO News (@BNONews) May 31, 2020
So many undercover cops inside the protest / Riots pic.twitter.com/mJM3AIPBCu — KEEM 🍿 (@KEEMSTAR) May 31, 2020
NYPD police car pushes people out of the way.
The police riot across the United States after one of their own murders an innocent black man pic.twitter.com/n7BTNAedYD — Owen Jones says join a union🌹 (@OwenJones84) May 31, 2020
Riots reported in several U.S. cities as unrest continues in the wake of George Floyd’s death pic.twitter.com/gS0MGMstxO — BNO News (@BNONews) May 31, 2020
Philadelphia burned on Saturday evening.
Center City Philly riots… I’m speechless pic.twitter.com/WTBfIV3RVQ — BrianPark (@bparkcritcare) May 30, 2020
COP CAR ON FIRE, APPLE STORE LOOTED IN PHILLY
pic.twitter.com/g4Zsi5ySku — The_Real_Fly (@The_Real_Fly) May 31, 2020
I no longer feel any compassion or sympathy for the “outrage” that sparked the riots. It’s gone now.
At a certain point you have to wonder if these ppl are HOPING something like George Floyd will happen so that they CAN do this. pic.twitter.com/07XwPiX45c — Brandon Straka (@BrandonStraka) May 30, 2020
Protester sings: “I don’t know what y’all been told, this racist shit is getting old.”
(NighSide)
Beverly Hills protesters chant “eat the rich.”
Socialists gather in Beverly Hills to chant “eat the rich.” pic.twitter.com/aY7JatKqhm — Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) May 30, 2020
(NBC LA)
WATCH LIVE: Police vehicles are on fire, as protests continue in the LA area. https://t.co/sdJnPr4jDD pic.twitter.com/Er28ThjWVp — NBC Los Angeles (@NBCLA) May 30, 2020
The government’s attempt to thwart social unrest during an economic depression was the deployment of helicopter money, i.e., Trump stimulus checks, while that move has widely failed in the last week, the next card is already being played: activate the National Guard across the country. Unrest will likely spill over into next week.
_________
(TLB) Editors note: Protesters were heard several times expressing their expectations that “this next Stimulus Check had better be a big one”… or “you ain’t seen any Unrest yet. This here tonight is just a sample of what Trump will get.”
*********
(TLB) edited and compiled this post from ZeroHedge, Twitter, Breitbart, BNO News, NighSide, and NBC LA.
Related article from The Liberty Beacon:
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-31--KEN’S CORNER: America’s Questions, A Universal Truth

Is the meaning of life a lie ?
Does our life still have meaning if our reasoning rational is found to be based on lies ?
Should we feel betrayed if our thoughts are discovered to be manipulated and controlled ?
Could we ever truly trust authority again , knowing we have been used without our knowledge ?
Are we considered just working fools , beasts of burden , where the forces of power strive to control our thoughts , our behaviors , and what we hold sacred as a nation is treated as if it is all a farce @ @ @ @ @ @ @ asked will be answered in like kind .
That the quality of a question will be of an identical quality .
In my study of a great motivator , Tony Robbins , he said that the answer to our question is a gift , a universal truth , and the balance of an inestimable equation .
He also explained that the reverse is true as well , that a negative question is also returned in like kind .
Two powerful questions might be : “ Is there such a thing as a noble @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any cause worth dying for ?
” Yes , complicated , and it might take a bit of time for our intellects to sort out an answer , but it will , and when it does , you will own it .
It is seemingly an element of human nature to justify the workings of the world , and yes , to manipulate them with our will , if we can .
A slave will bow to his master for a lifetime in bondage , but given an opportunity , he will choose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that a young man who goes to war these days has a justified reason to do so .
He is placing his life in real danger for a real ideal , isn ’ t he ?
Shouldn ’ t he be there because he sees a noble cause ?
Shouldn ’ t an ideal come first ?
And shouldn ’ t it be strong enough to rouse him , by the passion of honesty and truth , without being manipulated by a lie , or forced by a draft ?
Shouldn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have a true reason , and shouldn ’ t that reason be based on a justifiable accolade of truth ?
How can we uphold our actions as a nation when we aren ’ t informed as to why we take action it in the first place ?
Would we consent to go to war for the profit of an international war machine ?
Few would , unless they were a highly paid mercenaries .
There is a point to knowing about our ability to find truth , by asking an honest question , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or souls , and our future… The light of truth , after the fact… Ronald Reagan is said to be one of the 100 most influential people in the 20th century .
As he occupied the White House in the mid-1980 ’ s he accentuated two things that I will attempt to explain here .
One , as an ultra-conservative , he implemented a free enterprise fiscal policy , including sweeping tax cuts and deregulation of the oil industry , and two , swore to tip the balance of the cold war .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ but there was a price to pay , and we Americans in the south , unknowingly , paid for it dearly… Our southern economy did not entirely survive the 1980 ’ s ; we had to start mostly from scratch , as seven of our 10 local banks went belly up… I left three companies , from mergers to bankruptcy , and Louisiana and Texas was economically devastated .
I read the paper every day for information and hope , but oil prices continued to plummet , and good hard-working people lost everything @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hopes .
No one I knew could tell me why… We all had questions , but the truth of the matter was not available to us… We didn ’ t know how to even poise the question .
I did what I had to do to survive , as so many oil-field workers did : to keep food on the table .
Our wives and children helped pull us through , combining salaries to get by .
In 1986 it was so bad that I couldn ’ t even find a house to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ work in a hotel for two years , displacing my family and leaving my friends behind .
I couldn ’ t sell my house in Crowley for 1/5th of what I still owed on it !
I had a bumper sticker that read : ” Last one out turn out the lights.
” I blamed myself .
If I could have been smarter , stronger , or positioned myself better… I thought that the new environmental liberals had fined the oil companies out of existence .
I thought it was a normal correction @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out for what !
I was wrong .
I was too close to it to understand , we all were , and information , the truth , wasn ’ t published .
Here are a couple of points to ponder from the year 1983 , as we face the same scenario now in 2017… • None Congress did away with tax benefits previously given to oil and gas drilling .
• None There were massive and unprecedented tax reforms , by the White House .
• None There was an undeniable link between @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the eventual collapse of the USSR .
With no more investment dollars , the oil industry became a burned out shell , and the Soviet Union took it full on the chin .
It was a “ geopolitical blow ” according to the book : Victory : The Reagan Administration ’ s Secret Strategy that hastened the Collapse of the Soviet Union , by Peter Schweizer .
By the time President Reagan was reelected in 1984 , his secret economic strategies were taking its toll against Russia .
Credit from the west @ @ @ @ @ @ @ technology denied , both liquid currency and traded Western technology slowed to a trickle .
The Siberian pipeline , expected to bring in hard currency for Russia , was years behind schedule , and Russia became mired in Afghanistan , their Vietnam..
The Reagan administration frustrated efforts further by a concerted technical disinformation program against them , and it was pure genius .
These catalysts were in place .
“ We wanted lower international oil prices largely for the benefit of the American economy.
” Said White House counsel Edwin Meese .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Moscow was icing on the cake.
” To pull this off , they solicited the support of the world ’ s largest producer of oil , Saudi Arabia… and as we poured over the paper for any sign of reason and hope , nothing of this was mentioned… I may have believed Mr. Meese ’ s words having a morning cup of coffee with other unemployed Mud Men… but not now .
His words were lies .
It was easy for the Saudis and OPEC to do .
It only cost about $ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of oil , and they could still maintain a healthy profit at a lower market price .
Intelligence has found since then , according to Mr. Schweizer , that the USSR had an annual loss of $ 13 billion from this oil price drop .
The end came when the Soviets tried to borrow more from the west .
With lack of funds , projects died .
Disinformation made it weak , furthered by the devaluation of the dollar …but it was oil prices that finally shut the doors .
The country collapsed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Vietnam in Afghanistan , and as our CIA operative Osama ben Laden harassed Russian boys with US made weapons , As they tried to protect their National pipeline , our Military Industrial Complex made billions selling arms .
It wasn ’ t mentioned in our National Newspapers that we wanted control of the poppy fields that supply Europe with high grade opium for distribution around the world… And our solders are there guarding those crops even today…It was opium that killed two of my shipmates in the Hong Kong Hilton hotel in 1970 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ my tour of duty .
My West Pacific Vietnam experience on the USS Kitty Hawk was another very profitable venture for the arms trade… and what was it for ?
Democracy ?
That ’ s what we were told : to fight Communism .
What isn ’ t said is that war is very good for the arms industry , and international bankers built infrastructure so that American businesses could make more profit .
And South Korea , Japan , Cambodia , South Vietnam , China… So what are the almighty powers of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lives now ?
Can we figure out the strategy they seem to set for reasons known only to them ?
Insider trading is lucrative , but unless you have a crystal ball everything you do is based on a speculation… Do you think the international banks and the Federal Reserve makes decisions based on speculation ?
Oh , did I say that ?
That would mean they have a common interest , and it is taboo to use the word conspiracy .
Is the lack of information considered a lie ?
Are we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is it purely about big bucks , or possibly just the power to control the masses ?
Of course , we must realize too , that a certain amount of secrecy is necessary for security reasons .
So trust is an issue also .
We have to trust that the people in power in America have our Liberty and welfare as the primary goal , and not a selfishly motivated concern , like a black bottom line for their friends… .
It is so easy to do when you are totally exhausted working @ @ @ @ @ @ @ credit cards… Fifty percent of us are either too tied up to pay attention , or too tired to care , and that is a speculative guess too… .
Mr. Reagan , bless his heart , knew these answers well , because he and his government created the questions… and they are lost now to a man who sat and dreamed by his sunny window with Alzheimer disease… for years before his death .
What was lost to him , to all of us , is beyond measure… It seems that what we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be , and by that process our freedom to rationally choose is taken away , and our American Dreams will remain just that… Sure , our founders told us that we the people must pull the reigns of our government , but looking at the world , and our influence on it , that could not be further from the truth… and that , I am sorry to say , is the real truth of our reality .
I ’ ll end this with a couple of questions : • None Do you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Soviet Union , doesn ’ t remember those times ?
• None Do you think the KGB no longer exists ?
• None Do you think that forgiveness is in their heart , as they now consider themselves an Orthodox Christian nation ?
• None “ The humblest citizen of all the land , when clad in the armor of a righteous cause , is stronger than all the hosts of Error.
” -William Jennings Bryan in a speech at National Democratic Convention ( 1896 ) .
• None “ Public office @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hudson , a newspaper man , produced this slogan from various speeches of Grover Cleveland during his first campaign for Presidency ( 1884 ) .
• None “ Let us have faith that right makes might ; and in that faith let us to the end , dare to do our duty as we understand it.
” -Abraham Lincoln • None “ The answer to this dilemma of unconstitutional government and runaway spending is simple : restore a burning conviction in the hearts and minds of people that freedom works and government largesse @ @ @ @ @ @ @ once again regain their confidence in the benefits of Liberty- and demand it from their elected leaders- Congress will act appropriately .
– Part of Congressman Dr. Ron Paul ’ s introduction in his United States Constitution handout , 2004 .
Final note May , 2020 : Truth is the only light in our enslaved darkness , and without it we can not find a future we can call our own .
Our Constitution is the only weapon we have to fight tyranny .
Liberty is not free , and once lost only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get it back .
Our founders told us that our civil liberties are not granted my men , but by God .
They gave us a great gift , but slowly , as one manufactured false flag war , orchestrated depressions , a government owned welfare state , an educational system that rewrites history and promotes voluntary servitude , and we have lost our way .
We need to ask powerful questions… From the Author , Ken La Rive – We in the Liberty movement have been fighting to take back this country @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and with the love of God and country in our hearts .
Our banner has been trampled on and displaced by a multitude of distractions , further eroding our nation and the cause for Liberty .
And so , as we are pulled by forces we can not fathom , powerful entities with unlimited resources stolen from our future , unaccountable trillions printed out of thin air and put on our backs as debt , we must formulate the most pitiful of all questions any patriot might ask in the final hour : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ master ’ s tyranny , or are we going to demand the return of our civil liberties and Constitution ?
Are we going to choose The Banner of Liberty , or the shackles of voluntary servitude ?
Will it be a war for corporate profit , or a war to regain our ability to self govern , as the blood and toil of our forefathers presented to us , their children , as a gift ?
I fear that decision is emanate .
I fear that any decision will be a hard one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is that the decision has already been made for us .

KEN’S CORNER: America’s Questions, A Universal Truth
By TLB Contributing Writer: Ken LaRive
Is the meaning of life a lie?
Does our life still have meaning if our reasoning rational is found to be based on lies? Should we feel betrayed if our thoughts are discovered to be manipulated and controlled? Could we ever truly trust authority again, knowing we have been used without our knowledge? Are we considered just working fools, beasts of burden, where the forces of power strive to control our thoughts, our behaviors, and what we hold sacred as a nation is treated as if it is all a farce? It is said that every question asked will be answered in like kind. That the quality of a question will be of an identical quality. In my study of a great motivator, Tony Robbins, he said that the answer to our question is a gift, a universal truth, and the balance of an inestimable equation. He also explained that the reverse is true as well, that a negative question is also returned in like kind.
Two powerful questions might be: “Is there such a thing as a noble cause?” and “Is there any cause worth dying for?” Yes, complicated, and it might take a bit of time for our intellects to sort out an answer, but it will, and when it does, you will own it.
It is seemingly an element of human nature to justify the workings of the world, and yes, to manipulate them with our will, if we can. A slave will bow to his master for a lifetime in bondage, but given an opportunity, he will choose Liberty. We would like to believe that a young man who goes to war these days has a justified reason to do so. He is placing his life in real danger for a real ideal, isn’t he? Shouldn’t he be there because he sees a noble cause? Shouldn’t an ideal come first? And shouldn’t it be strong enough to rouse him, by the passion of honesty and truth, without being manipulated by a lie, or forced by a draft?
Shouldn’t war, even a cold war, have a true reason, and shouldn’t that reason be based on a justifiable accolade of truth? How can we uphold our actions as a nation when we aren’t informed as to why we take action it in the first place? Would we consent to go to war for the profit of an international war machine? Few would, unless they were a highly paid mercenaries. There is a point to knowing about our ability to find truth, by asking an honest question, and it can save our minds, or souls, and our future…
The light of truth, after the fact…
Ronald Reagan is said to be one of the 100 most influential people in the 20th century. As he occupied the White House in the mid-1980’s he accentuated two things that I will attempt to explain here. One, as an ultra-conservative, he implemented a free enterprise fiscal policy, including sweeping tax cuts and deregulation of the oil industry, and two, swore to tip the balance of the cold war.
Mr. Reagan succeeded on both counts, but there was a price to pay, and we Americans in the south, unknowingly, paid for it dearly…
Our southern economy did not entirely survive the 1980’s; we had to start mostly from scratch, as seven of our 10 local banks went belly up… I left three companies, from mergers to bankruptcy, and Louisiana and Texas was economically devastated. I read the paper every day for information and hope, but oil prices continued to plummet, and good hard-working people lost everything in an avalanche of ruined dreams and hopes. No one I knew could tell me why… We all had questions, but the truth of the matter was not available to us… We didn’t know how to even poise the question.
I did what I had to do to survive, as so many oil-field workers did: to keep food on the table. Our wives and children helped pull us through, combining salaries to get by. In 1986 it was so bad that I couldn’t even find a house to paint. I left the states to work in a hotel for two years, displacing my family and leaving my friends behind. I couldn’t sell my house in Crowley for 1/5th of what I still owed on it! I had a bumper sticker that read:”Last one out turn out the lights.”
I blamed myself. If I could have been smarter, stronger, or positioned myself better… I thought that the new environmental liberals had fined the oil companies out of existence. I thought it was a normal correction, but I couldn’t figure out for what! I was wrong. I was too close to it to understand, we all were, and information, the truth, wasn’t published.
Here are a couple of points to ponder from the year 1983, as we face the same scenario now in 2017…
Congress did away with tax benefits previously given to oil and gas drilling.
There were massive and unprecedented tax reforms, by the White House.
There was an undeniable link between the oil industry, the Saudis, and the eventual collapse of the USSR.
With no more investment dollars, the oil industry became a burned out shell, and the Soviet Union took it full on the chin. It was a “geopolitical blow” according to the book: Victory: The Reagan Administration’s Secret Strategy that hastened the Collapse of the Soviet Union, by Peter Schweizer.
By the time President Reagan was reelected in 1984, his secret economic strategies were taking its toll against Russia. Credit from the west was gone, and export licenses for technology denied, both liquid currency and traded Western technology slowed to a trickle. The Siberian pipeline, expected to bring in hard currency for Russia, was years behind schedule, and Russia became mired in Afghanistan, their Vietnam.. The Reagan administration frustrated efforts further by a concerted technical disinformation program against them, and it was pure genius.
These catalysts were in place. “We wanted lower international oil prices largely for the benefit of the American economy.” Said White House counsel Edwin Meese. “The fact that it meant trouble for Moscow was icing on the cake.” To pull this off, they solicited the support of the world’s largest producer of oil, Saudi Arabia… and as we poured over the paper for any sign of reason and hope, nothing of this was mentioned… I may have believed Mr. Meese’s words having a morning cup of coffee with other unemployed Mud Men… but not now. His words were lies.
It was easy for the Saudis and OPEC to do. It only cost about $1.50 back then to produce a barrel of oil, and they could still maintain a healthy profit at a lower market price. Intelligence has found since then, according to Mr. Schweizer, that the USSR had an annual loss of $13 billion from this oil price drop.
The end came when the Soviets tried to borrow more from the west. With lack of funds, projects died. Disinformation made it weak, furthered by the devaluation of the dollar …but it was oil prices that finally shut the doors. The country collapsed in 1991… as they were fighting their Vietnam in Afghanistan, and as our CIA operative Osama ben Laden harassed Russian boys with US made weapons, As they tried to protect their National pipeline, our Military Industrial Complex made billions selling arms. It wasn’t mentioned in our National Newspapers that we wanted control of the poppy fields that supply Europe with high grade opium for distribution around the world… And our solders are there guarding those crops even today…It was opium that killed two of my shipmates in the Hong Kong Hilton hotel in 1970, the only men to die in my tour of duty.
My West Pacific Vietnam experience on the USS Kitty Hawk was another very profitable venture for the arms trade… and what was it for? Democracy? That’s what we were told: to fight Communism. What isn’t said is that war is very good for the arms industry, and international bankers built infrastructure so that American businesses could make more profit. And South Korea, Japan, Cambodia, South Vietnam, China…
What National Security?
So what are the almighty powers of our monstrous centralized government doing with our lives now? Can we figure out the strategy they seem to set for reasons known only to them? Insider trading is lucrative, but unless you have a crystal ball everything you do is based on a speculation… Do you think the international banks and the Federal Reserve makes decisions based on speculation? Oh, did I say that? That would mean they have a common interest, and it is taboo to use the word conspiracy.
Is the lack of information considered a lie? Are we talking about national security here, or is it purely about big bucks, or possibly just the power to control the masses? Of course, we must realize too, that a certain amount of secrecy is necessary for security reasons. So trust is an issue also. We have to trust that the people in power in America have our Liberty and welfare as the primary goal, and not a selfishly motivated concern, like a black bottom line for their friends…. It is so easy to do when you are totally exhausted working overtime to pay the interest on your credit cards… Fifty percent of us are either too tied up to pay attention, or too tired to care, and that is a speculative guess too….
Mr. Reagan, bless his heart, knew these answers well, because he and his government created the questions… and they are lost now to a man who sat and dreamed by his sunny window with Alzheimer disease… for years before his death. What was lost to him, to all of us, is beyond measure… It seems that what we are is what we are told to be, and by that process our freedom to rationally choose is taken away, and our American Dreams will remain just that… Sure, our founders told us that we the people must pull the reigns of our government, but looking at the world, and our influence on it, that could not be further from the truth… and that, I am sorry to say, is the real truth of our reality.
I’ll end this with a couple of questions:
Do you think the USSR, that morphed into the Soviet Union, doesn’t remember those times?
Do you think the KGB no longer exists?
Do you think that forgiveness is in their heart, as they now consider themselves an Orthodox Christian nation?
… and a few quotes:
“The humblest citizen of all the land, when clad in the armor of a righteous cause, is stronger than all the hosts of Error.”-William Jennings Bryan in a speech at National Democratic Convention (1896).
“Public office is a public trust.”-William C. Hudson, a newspaper man, produced this slogan from various speeches of Grover Cleveland during his first campaign for Presidency (1884).
“Let us have faith that right makes might; and in that faith let us to the end, dare to do our duty as we understand it.”-Abraham Lincoln
“The answer to this dilemma of unconstitutional government and runaway spending is simple: restore a burning conviction in the hearts and minds of people that freedom works and government largesse is a fraud. When the people once again regain their confidence in the benefits of Liberty- and demand it from their elected leaders- Congress will act appropriately. – Part of Congressman Dr. Ron Paul’s introduction in his United States Constitution handout, 2004.
Final note May, 2020: Truth is the only light in our enslaved darkness, and without it we can not find a future we can call our own. Our Constitution is the only weapon we have to fight tyranny. Liberty is not free, and once lost only the blood of tyrants and patriots will get it back. Our founders told us that our civil liberties are not granted my men, but by God. They gave us a great gift, but slowly, as one manufactured false flag war, orchestrated depressions, a government owned welfare state, an educational system that rewrites history and promotes voluntary servitude, and we have lost our way. We need to ask powerful questions…
••••
Read more great articles from KEN’S CORNER
••••
From the Author, Ken La Rive – We in the Liberty movement have been fighting to take back this country for less than a decade, peacefully and with the love of God and country in our hearts. Our banner has been trampled on and displaced by a multitude of distractions, further eroding our nation and the cause for Liberty. And so, as we are pulled by forces we cannot fathom, powerful entities with unlimited resources stolen from our future, unaccountable trillions printed out of thin air and put on our backs as debt, we must formulate the most pitiful of all questions any patriot might ask in the final hour: Are we going to fight for our master’s tyranny, or are we going to demand the return of our civil liberties and Constitution? Are we going to choose The Banner of Liberty, or the shackles of voluntary servitude? Will it be a war for corporate profit, or a war to regain our ability to self govern, as the blood and toil of our forefathers presented to us, their children, as a gift? I fear that decision is emanate. I fear that any decision will be a hard one, but my greatest fear of all is that the decision has already been made for us.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-31--Black in the Age of Autism: A Tale of 2 Boys

Black in the Age of Autism : A Tale of Two Boys Contributed to TLB by : The Children ’ s Health Defense Team A beautiful African American baby came for a 15 month well checkup in 1998 .
His growth and development were normal .
The mother had a smile on her face and joy in her heart .
Per the current CDC recommendations , the doctor ordered an MMR vaccine , along with the caveat that the baby may have a fever , rash or irritability about 7-12 days later .
However , what happened was unexpected and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and lost his emerging language .
He changed from being a happy baby to being irritable and hard to settle .
The doctor wondered what could possibly be going on .
That doctor was me .
Thus started my 22 years ( and counting ) diversion from teaching pediatrics in a family medicine residency program to trying to figure out what was happening to a generation of children who seemed to have much more chronic illness and neurodevelopmental problems than I had been trained to expect when I finished my Chief Residency in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In 2000 , I started a solo practice to serve children who were falling through the cracks inherent in a world where short acute pediatric visits got reimbursed and complex problems which required critical thinking and research did not .
Fortunately , I had a husband with a salary and two kids who were likely to get college academic scholarships , so he enabled me to work for 16 months with no salary .
I stumbled upon some pioneers who were looking at the medical problems of children with autism ; neurodevelopmental pediatrician @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
I began attending Defeat Autism Now !
Conferences , where I met amazing mentors like Bernie Rimland , Jon Pangborn , Sid Baker , Richard Deth , and Jill James to name but a few .
I began attending twice yearly ARI Think Tanks , where I learned from bench scientists , other clinicians , and brilliant parents of children with autism .
The goal was to synthesize what the parents saw in their children with the best basic science and clinical acumen .
I served as Medical Director of the Autism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was wonderful ) and as an expert witness in Vaccine Court ( which was horrible ) .
Hearing the controversy over Wakefield ’ s concern over the safety of the MMR vaccine , I decided to dive into some clinical research to see for myself .
Our gut biopsy study on 30 children with autism and 30 controls , interpreted by a local pathologist who was blinded as to the status of the child , replicated the findings of excess inflammation and increased lymphoid nodular hyperplasia in the children with autism compared to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the lack of double-blind vaccine trials , the adjuvants and excipients in vaccines , the synergistic effects of multiple vaccines given together and the growing burden of childhood chronic illness which was devastating families .
Over the years I appeared before a Senate sub-committee , went to the leadership of the AAP , wrote to the CDC and attended NIH hearings to advocate for research into the medical problems in children with autism .
I begged for a vaxxed/unvaxxed study .
I have been spectacularly unsuccessful as there has never been a true @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at long term side effects , much less on vaccines given in various combinations .
Nor have there been CDC-funded studies comparing the highly vaccinated to unvaccinated children for prevalence of chronic disease .
Fast forward to 2016 when William Thompson alleged that the CDC knew , from a study done in the early 2000s , that age of MMR receipt was correlated with the risk of autism in African American children .
Black boys who got MMR before the age of three were 3.36 times more likely to be diagnosed with autism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than a decade into using a modified vaccine schedule ( which still met criteria for Virginia kindergarten entrance ) .
We avoided immunizing patients who were ill , advised against the use of acetaminophen after vaccines due to glutathione depletion , and factored in family history of allergy , autoimmunity , and autism when making vaccine decisions .
Our prevalence of new onset autism in patients born into our practice was significantly lower than the national average .
We gave MMR at 2 years of age for most children and only if they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no recent antibiotics .
We had no new cases of autism in African American children .
That changed when one of our Medicaid patients went to the local Health Department to get vaccines .
We advise our patients to follow Advocates for Children vaccine recommendations when they go to the Health Department and to avoid vaccines when recently sick or on antibiotics , but this mother reported getting significant pressure to “ catch him up ” on vaccines .
At his one-year checkup , he was on 10 days of Augmentin for an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( respiratory syncytial virus ) .
He presented to the Health Department 12 days after onset of RSV and received the following vaccines at once : DTAP , MMR , varivax , Hib and pneumococcal .
The patient returned eight days later presenting with fussiness & irritability ; this is the same time frame one would expect an MMR reaction to manifest .
At his 15-month checkup , he was having tantrums and head-banging and biting kids at day care .
His head circumference had increased from 80th percentile at 12 months to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a family history of macrocephaly .
He was referred to neurology .
A genetics workup included a chromosomal microarray , a Fragile X test , and testing 2000 genes known to be associated with autism and intellectual disability .
All were negative .
At age five , he is still on a waitlist for ABA .
He got speech therapy and an IEP .
He has global developmental delay and has “ spells ” but his EEG is normal .
He has problem behaviors triggered by transitions and frustration at not being able @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , kicks and pinches others and has self-injurious behaviors .
I think the clinical evidence shows that he suffered neuroinflammation with the multiple vaccines given at 12 months .
Since the original results of the age effect risk of MMR for African American boys became known in 2016 ( remember the data was from 2001 ) we have delayed MMR vaccine to age three for black children .
What about my original patient from 1998 ?
I still take care of him despite the fact that I told the parents I thought his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gave him when he was 15 months old .
They forgave me because no one suspected problems back then .
The infamous retracted Wakefield paper was published in 1998 , and the kerfuffle had not started when I gave the vaccine order .
He is 22 now , and has difficult-to-control seizures and very little language .
He does not have the daily living skills to live independently .
Other problems that have been identified include Vitamin D deficiency , allergies , and intermittent neutropenia .
His only identified genetic risk factor is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ compound heterozygous MTHFR status .
His parents forgave me .
It took much longer for me to forgive myself .
My career since then has surely been motivated by my desire to make amends for my mistake .
The CDC apparently identified a signal of risk in 2001 and then manipulated the study protocol retroactively to make the signal go away .
The suppression of the MMR autism risk played into decisions that were made by the Institute of Medicine and the National Vaccine Compensation Program ( aka “ Vaccine “ Court ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ research to precisely calculate the relative risk factors that may be operative in autism risk for black children .
But the parents of the approximately 100,000 African American boys who have been diagnosed with autism since 2001 may find the misinformation discounting risks of MMR in their children unforgivable .

Black in the Age of Autism: A Tale of Two Boys
Contributed to TLB by: The Children’s Health Defense Team
By: Elizabeth Mumper, M.D., FAAP, The Rimland Center
A beautiful African American baby came for a 15 month well checkup in 1998. His growth and development were normal. The mother had a smile on her face and joy in her heart.
Per the current CDC recommendations, the doctor ordered an MMR vaccine, along with the caveat that the baby may have a fever, rash or irritability about 7-12 days later. However, what happened was unexpected and frightening. He developed yellow mushy diarrhea and lost his emerging language. He changed from being a happy baby to being irritable and hard to settle. The doctor wondered what could possibly be going on.
That doctor was me.
… trying to figure what was happening to a generation of children who seemed to have much more chronic illness and neurodevelopmental problems than I had been trained to expect …
Thus started my 22 years (and counting) diversion from teaching pediatrics in a family medicine residency program to trying to figure out what was happening to a generation of children who seemed to have much more chronic illness and neurodevelopmental problems than I had been trained to expect when I finished my Chief Residency in pediatrics at a highly regarded university.
In 2000, I started a solo practice to serve children who were falling through the cracks inherent in a world where short acute pediatric visits got reimbursed and complex problems which required critical thinking and research did not. Fortunately, I had a husband with a salary and two kids who were likely to get college academic scholarships, so he enabled me to work for 16 months with no salary. I stumbled upon some pioneers who were looking at the medical problems of children with autism; neurodevelopmental pediatrician Mary Megson was the first I met. I began attending Defeat Autism Now! Conferences, where I met amazing mentors like Bernie Rimland, Jon Pangborn, Sid Baker, Richard Deth, and Jill James to name but a few. I began attending twice yearly ARI Think Tanks, where I learned from bench scientists, other clinicians, and brilliant parents of children with autism. The goal was to synthesize what the parents saw in their children with the best basic science and clinical acumen. I served as Medical Director of the Autism Research Institute for five years (which was wonderful) and as an expert witness in Vaccine Court (which was horrible).
Hearing the controversy over Wakefield’s concern over the safety of the MMR vaccine, I decided to dive into some clinical research to see for myself. Our gut biopsy study on 30 children with autism and 30 controls, interpreted by a local pathologist who was blinded as to the status of the child, replicated the findings of excess inflammation and increased lymphoid nodular hyperplasia in the children with autism compared to controls.
I became more concerned about the lack of double-blind vaccine trials, the adjuvants and excipients in vaccines, the synergistic effects of multiple vaccines given together and the growing burden of childhood chronic illness which was devastating families. Over the years I appeared before a Senate sub-committee, went to the leadership of the AAP, wrote to the CDC and attended NIH hearings to advocate for research into the medical problems in children with autism. I begged for a vaxxed/unvaxxed study. I have been spectacularly unsuccessful as there has never been a true placebo-controlled vaccine trial on single vaccines looking at long term side effects, much less on vaccines given in various combinations. Nor have there been CDC-funded studies comparing the highly vaccinated to unvaccinated children for prevalence of chronic disease.
Black boys who got MMR before the age of three were 3.36 times more likely to be diagnosed with autism. Black boys who got MMR before the age of three were 3.36 times more likely to be diagnosed with autism.
Fast forward to 2016 when William Thompson alleged that the CDC knew, from a study done in the early 2000s, that age of MMR receipt was correlated with the risk of autism in African American children. Black boys who got MMR before the age of three were 3.36 times more likely to be diagnosed with autism.
In 2016, we were more than a decade into using a modified vaccine schedule (which still met criteria for Virginia kindergarten entrance). We avoided immunizing patients who were ill, advised against the use of acetaminophen after vaccines due to glutathione depletion, and factored in family history of allergy, autoimmunity, and autism when making vaccine decisions. Our prevalence of new onset autism in patients born into our practice was significantly lower than the national average. We gave MMR at 2 years of age for most children and only if they had no ongoing undiagnosed gastrointestinal problems and no recent antibiotics. We had no new cases of autism in African American children.
That changed when one of our Medicaid patients went to the local Health Department to get vaccines. We advise our patients to follow Advocates for Children vaccine recommendations when they go to the Health Department and to avoid vaccines when recently sick or on antibiotics, but this mother reported getting significant pressure to “catch him up” on vaccines. At his one-year checkup, he was on 10 days of Augmentin for an ear infection and day 4 of RSV (respiratory syncytial virus). He presented to the Health Department 12 days after onset of RSV and received the following vaccines at once: DTAP, MMR, varivax, Hib and pneumococcal.
The patient returned eight days later presenting with fussiness & irritability; this is the same time frame one would expect an MMR reaction to manifest. At his 15-month checkup, he was having tantrums and head-banging and biting kids at day care. His head circumference had increased from 80th percentile at 12 months to 97th percentile, in the context of a family history of macrocephaly. He was referred to neurology.
A genetics workup included a chromosomal microarray, a Fragile X test, and testing 2000 genes known to be associated with autism and intellectual disability. All were negative.
At age five, he is still on a waitlist for ABA. He got speech therapy and an IEP. He has global developmental delay and has “spells” but his EEG is normal. He has problem behaviors triggered by transitions and frustration at not being able to communicate. He hits, bites, kicks and pinches others and has self-injurious behaviors. I think the clinical evidence shows that he suffered neuroinflammation with the multiple vaccines given at 12 months.
Since the original results of the age effect risk of MMR for African American boys became known in 2016 (remember the data was from 2001) we have delayed MMR vaccine to age three for black children.
What about my original patient from 1998? I still take care of him despite the fact that I told the parents I thought his autism was related to the shot I gave him when he was 15 months old. They forgave me because no one suspected problems back then. The infamous retracted Wakefield paper was published in 1998, and the kerfuffle had not started when I gave the vaccine order. He is 22 now, and has difficult-to-control seizures and very little language. He does not have the daily living skills to live independently. Other problems that have been identified include Vitamin D deficiency, allergies, and intermittent neutropenia. His only identified genetic risk factor is impairment in folate biochemistry related to his compound heterozygous MTHFR status.
His parents forgave me. It took much longer for me to forgive myself. My career since then has surely been motivated by my desire to make amends for my mistake.
The CDC apparently identified a signal of risk in 2001 and then manipulated the study protocol retroactively to make the signal go away. The suppression of the MMR autism risk played into decisions that were made by the Institute of Medicine and the National Vaccine Compensation Program (aka “Vaccine “Court”).
We do not have enough research to precisely calculate the relative risk factors that may be operative in autism risk for black children. But the parents of the approximately 100,000 African American boys who have been diagnosed with autism since 2001 may find the misinformation discounting risks of MMR in their children unforgivable.
••••
••••
TLB Editors Note: This is World Mercury Project on steroids! TLB highly recommends you click on the image below, visit this great website, and do whatever you can to help see this vital forum succeed … for the sake of our children !!! Please take the time to Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-06-01--Why The Public Should Rebel Against Forced Vaccinations – The Arguments

The debate over the morality and practicality of forced vaccinations has been raging for many years , long before the coronavirus ever hit the US population .
With the advent of the pandemic the narrative has shifted to one of “ necessity ” .
The media and the majority of governments around the world now act as if mass vaccinations are a given ; the “ debate is over ” , as collectivists like to say when they are tired of having to deal with any logical or factual complaints .
In the case of the novel coronavirus , there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ course the virus was engineered or evolved in a lab ( as more and more evidence is suggesting ) , and then perhaps there is one already developed .
Typically , vaccines take years to test and produce , and whenever a vaccine is rushed onto the market very bad things tend to happen .
The vaccine debate often revolves around the issue of safety .
Is a particular inoculation safe or poisonous ?
Does it have long term effects that are dangerous ?
Does it harm children with highly sensitive and underdeveloped @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but ultimately the fight over vaccines has less to do with medical safety or effectiveness and more to do with individual rights vs government demands .
In other words , the more important questions are : Should social engineering by governments and elites be allowed ?
Do people have the right to determine how their bodies are medically augmented or manipulated ?
Does the “ security of the majority ” take precedence over the civil liberties of the individual ?
And if so , who gets to determine what freedoms will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ forced vaccination philosophy usually make a legal or technical argument first before they appeal to the idea of “ the greater good ” .
They do this because they know that public perception often assumes ( wrongly ) that legal authority is the same as moral authority .
In 1905 , the US Supreme Court was presented with Jacobson vs. Massachusetts , a case involving the subject of state-enforced smallpox vaccination .
The defendant argued on the grounds of the 14th Amendment that his bodily liberty was being violated by the state if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his consent .
The state and the Supreme Court felt differently ( of course ) .
The Supreme Court ruled against Jacobson on the grounds that his refusal to take the vaccine put other people “ at risk ” , and that “ for the common good ” states have certain “ police powers ” that supersede personal liberties .
Whenever liberty movement activists argue against forced vaccinations on constitutional grounds , THIS is the counter-argument that the government and statists will make .
They will bring up Jacobson vs. Massachusetts and then @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discussion .
Essentially , the Supreme Court argued that the federal government could not interfere with state-imposed forced vaccinations on the grounds of states rights and the 10th Amendment .
Most people in the liberty movement will find this rather ironic , as it is bizarre to hear about the federal government defending states rights .
But , this support of the 10th Amendment is highly selective .
First , let ’ s not forget that the Supreme Court has been wrong many times in the past .
In the Dredd Scott case @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in favor of slavery and the right of states to enforce the institution .
They also argued that the 5th Amendment protected slave owners because freeing slaves meant depriving owners of their “ property ” .
The Supreme Court ’ s habit is to defend states rights and the 10th Amendment when people ’ s individual liberties are being quashed .
However , if a case involves states protecting citizens from federal intrusion , the court flips and attacks states rights when they work in favor of individual liberty or self determination .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the reason why Trump and the federal government have mostly left the lockdowns and emergency actions to the states .
The legal precedence was already established in 1905 on quarantines and forcing vaccinations through state police powers , so it only follows that the establishment would utilize the states to carry out such measures in the near future .
The “ states vs federal government ” debate sets up a false paradigm .
There is no separation between state and federal governments when it comes to tyranny – both sides love it , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ each other at times .
That is to say , whether it is the federal government violating your constitutional rights or the state government violating your constitutional rights , the Supreme Court is often comfortable with both .
The truth they don ’ t want to discuss is that , at bottom , the Bill of Rights overrules them regardless of federal precedent or the 10th Amendment .
The key to the Bill of Rights is that each American citizen has INHERENT LIBERTIES that supersede both federal and state power .
These rights @ @ @ @ @ @ @ violated today , and the law can not be adjusted to violate them tomorrow .
These rights and freedoms are ETERNAL .
The Supreme Court hisses with a forked tongue about the “ spirit of the constitution ” but ignores the clear and concrete intent as stated by the Founders .
Statists argue in favor of the “ living document ” philosophy when it suits them as a means to change the original meaning and laws put forth in the Bill of Rights because this allows them to violate citizen freedoms under the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ legality ” is not the same a morality .
Legality is meaningless , and the Supreme Court is meaningless if it acts against the constitutional bedrock of the Bill of Rights and individual liberty as they have done numerous times in the past .
So , if we can not rely on legality to protect us from state tyranny , what can we rely on ?
Forced vaccine advocates will say that morality is on their side as well , for if a person does not vaccinate they are putting the rest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Therefore , your individual rights must be violated in order to protect the rights of the rest of society .
The problem is that Jacobson vs Massachusetts makes no logical argument supporting this assertion , and neither do forced vaccine proponents .
Look at it this way : How can a person that is not vaccinated “ harm ” people that are vaccinated ?
How are they putting those people at risk ?
If the vaccine actually works , then vaccinated people are safe from infection , aren ’ t they ?
So @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” is the person that chose not to vaccinate .
This comes down to personal choice : there is no question of “ the greater good ” or social risk .
I find it fascinating that the people that argue fervently in favor of forced vaccinations ( people like Bill Gates ) also tend to be the same people that argue in favor of abortion rights .
So , “ my body my choice ” is acceptable when it comes to women ending the lives of unborn children , but “ my body @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it comes to mass vaccinations even though an unvaccinated person is a threat to no one .
Some vaccine advocates will then claim that unvaccinated people could be host to “ mutations ” that threaten herd immunity .
The problem is that there is no evidence to support this argument .
The vast majority of viruses tend to mutate into LESS deadly or infectious strains , not more deadly .
The only mitigating factors would be if a virus was deliberately designed or engineered to mutate in an unnatural manner .
If a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vastly different and more deadly strain that can attack vaccinated persons , then the vaccine was never useful to begin with , and forced vaccinations are pointless .
Once again , if the vaccine is effective , then there is simply no basis for the position that an unvaccinated person puts vaccinated people in danger .
The next argument by pro-forced vaccination people is to ask “ why ” ?
Why do you care if you are vaccinated ?
What do you have to worry about ?
Just go along to get along @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a common anti-gun narrative : Why do you need to carry a gun ?
Why frighten other people ?
The chances you will need it are slim , right… ?
The most important answer to the gun question is “ Because it ’ s my right to carry and I plan to exercise it .
Also , your fear of guns does not take precedence over my constitutional freedoms.
” The same goes for forced vaccination : Because it is my right to refuse to have ANY pharmaceutical product injected into my @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not matter to my constitutional rights .
If you want to take the vaccine , then that is your choice .
Leave me out of it .
Arguing about hypothetical threats is a waste of time .
I carry a firearm because I have the right to have a means of defense just in case I need it .
I refuse vaccinations because I have a right to avoid potential bodily harm just in case I have suspicions of a faulty product .
And is there reason to be concerned about faulty vaccines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were rushed to the public have a track record of harming people ’ s health .
With globalists like Bill Gates , an obsessive champion of depopulation at the forefront of the Covid-19 effort , I have no plans to accept any coronavirus vaccine .
Bill Gates has funded numerous experimental vaccine trials through the World Health Organization , including Polio vaccination programs .
It was these same programs that led to viral outbreaks of polio in various countries and hundreds of paralyzed children .
In fact , the vaccines caused more cases @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This if VERIFIED FACT , admitted by the WHO and other mainstream sources , though numerous leftist media outlets continue to deny it .
At most , the WHO and Gates can claim that the infections were “ accidental ” .
But if this is the case , it would still suggest that vaccines developed by Gates Foundation programs and the WHO should not be trusted .
In 1976 a swine flu scare enabled the initiation of a government funded mass vaccination program .
The vaccine was faulty and was canceled in less @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cases of Guillain-Barre syndrome , a rare neurological condition that leads to temporary paralysis and sometimes death .
In 2008 , Swiss company Novartis tested a Bird Flu vaccine on the homeless and poor population of Poland .
The vaccine trial paid participants $ 2 , and they were told the inoculation was for the “ normal flu ” .
According a homeless center in the area at least 21 people died right after they participated in the trial .
A GlaxoSmithKline executive by the name of Moncef Slaoui was recently tapped by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s effort to develop a coronavirus vaccine .
This appointment should be highly concerning to the public .
Why ?
Because Glaxo has a dark history in vaccine development , including an incident in Argentina in 2007-2008 when they were fined after a pneumonia vaccine trial allegedly caused the deaths of at least 14 babies .
Slaoui was in charge of Glaxo ’ s vaccine division at the time .
Statists that argue in favor of forced vaccination will dismiss all of these examples as mere “ accidents ” that are “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fighting the pandemic is worth the risk of a “ few deaths ” due to some faulty vaccines .
But this does not address the core issue of the battle against forced vaccination programs .
Does a minority of elites in government or even a majority of useful idiots in the general population have the right to declare ownership of your body in the name of an arbitrary “ greater good ” ?
I say no , which is why I will NOT be conforming to any forced vaccine measures and I am @ @ @ @ @ @ @ myself from them if necessary .
As mentioned above , if a vaccine works , then there is no need to force people to take it .
It will protect those that want it and the only risk is to those that choose not to use it .
Frankly , the people in charge of the vaccine effort are not to be trusted , they have open ideological agendas that are questionable to say the least .
Allowing them to dictate what goes into our bodies is akin to slavery at best , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If you would like to support the work that Alt-Market does while also receiving content on advanced tactics for defeating the globalist agenda , subscribe to our exclusive newsletter The Wild Bunch Dispatch .
Learn more about it HERE .

The debate over the morality and practicality of forced vaccinations has been raging for many years, long before the coronavirus ever hit the US population. With the advent of the pandemic the narrative has shifted to one of “necessity”. The media and the majority of governments around the world now act as if mass vaccinations are a given; the “debate is over”, as collectivists like to say when they are tired of having to deal with any logical or factual complaints.
In the case of the novel coronavirus, there is no vaccine yet; unless of course the virus was engineered or evolved in a lab (as more and more evidence is suggesting), and then perhaps there is one already developed. Typically, vaccines take years to test and produce, and whenever a vaccine is rushed onto the market very bad things tend to happen.
The vaccine debate often revolves around the issue of safety. Is a particular inoculation safe or poisonous? Does it have long term effects that are dangerous? Does it harm children with highly sensitive and underdeveloped body systems? These are valid concerns, but ultimately the fight over vaccines has less to do with medical safety or effectiveness and more to do with individual rights vs government demands.
In other words, the more important questions are: Should social engineering by governments and elites be allowed? Do people have the right to determine how their bodies are medically augmented or manipulated? Does the “security of the majority” take precedence over the civil liberties of the individual? And if so, who gets to determine what freedoms will be taken away?
The Legal Argument
The purveyors of the forced vaccination philosophy usually make a legal or technical argument first before they appeal to the idea of “the greater good”. They do this because they know that public perception often assumes (wrongly) that legal authority is the same as moral authority.
In 1905, the US Supreme Court was presented with Jacobson vs. Massachusetts, a case involving the subject of state-enforced smallpox vaccination. The defendant argued on the grounds of the 14th Amendment that his bodily liberty was being violated by the state if he was subjected to arbitrary vaccination without his consent. The state and the Supreme Court felt differently (of course). The Supreme Court ruled against Jacobson on the grounds that his refusal to take the vaccine put other people “at risk”, and that “for the common good” states have certain “police powers” that supersede personal liberties.
Whenever liberty movement activists argue against forced vaccinations on constitutional grounds, THIS is the counter-argument that the government and statists will make. They will bring up Jacobson vs. Massachusetts and then claim that is the end of the discussion.
Essentially, the Supreme Court argued that the federal government could not interfere with state-imposed forced vaccinations on the grounds of states rights and the 10th Amendment. Most people in the liberty movement will find this rather ironic, as it is bizarre to hear about the federal government defending states rights. But, this support of the 10th Amendment is highly selective.
First, let’s not forget that the Supreme Court has been wrong many times in the past. In the Dredd Scott case in 1834, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of slavery and the right of states to enforce the institution. They also argued that the 5th Amendment protected slave owners because freeing slaves meant depriving owners of their “property”.
The Supreme Court’s habit is to defend states rights and the 10th Amendment when people’s individual liberties are being quashed. However, if a case involves states protecting citizens from federal intrusion, the court flips and attacks states rights when they work in favor of individual liberty or self determination.
The Jacobson vs. Massachusetts case may be the reason why Trump and the federal government have mostly left the lockdowns and emergency actions to the states. The legal precedence was already established in 1905 on quarantines and forcing vaccinations through state police powers, so it only follows that the establishment would utilize the states to carry out such measures in the near future.
The “states vs federal government” debate sets up a false paradigm. There is no separation between state and federal governments when it comes to tyranny – both sides love it, though they pretend to be opposed to each other at times. That is to say, whether it is the federal government violating your constitutional rights or the state government violating your constitutional rights, the Supreme Court is often comfortable with both.
The truth they don’t want to discuss is that, at bottom, the Bill of Rights overrules them regardless of federal precedent or the 10th Amendment. The key to the Bill of Rights is that each American citizen has INHERENT LIBERTIES that supersede both federal and state power. These rights are inalienable. They cannot be violated today, and the law cannot be adjusted to violate them tomorrow. These rights and freedoms are ETERNAL.
The Supreme Court hisses with a forked tongue about the “spirit of the constitution” but ignores the clear and concrete intent as stated by the Founders. Statists argue in favor of the “living document” philosophy when it suits them as a means to change the original meaning and laws put forth in the Bill of Rights because this allows them to violate citizen freedoms under the guise of “legality”. But “legality” is not the same a morality. Legality is meaningless, and the Supreme Court is meaningless if it acts against the constitutional bedrock of the Bill of Rights and individual liberty as they have done numerous times in the past.
The Moral Argument
So, if we cannot rely on legality to protect us from state tyranny, what can we rely on? Forced vaccine advocates will say that morality is on their side as well, for if a person does not vaccinate they are putting the rest of society at risk of infection. Therefore, your individual rights must be violated in order to protect the rights of the rest of society. The problem is that Jacobson vs Massachusetts makes no logical argument supporting this assertion, and neither do forced vaccine proponents.
Look at it this way: How can a person that is not vaccinated “harm” people that are vaccinated? How are they putting those people at risk? If the vaccine actually works, then vaccinated people are safe from infection, aren’t they? So, the only person “at risk” is the person that chose not to vaccinate. This comes down to personal choice: there is no question of “the greater good” or social risk.
I find it fascinating that the people that argue fervently in favor of forced vaccinations (people like Bill Gates) also tend to be the same people that argue in favor of abortion rights. So, “my body my choice” is acceptable when it comes to women ending the lives of unborn children, but “my body my choice” is not acceptable when it comes to mass vaccinations even though an unvaccinated person is a threat to no one.
Some vaccine advocates will then claim that unvaccinated people could be host to “mutations” that threaten herd immunity. The problem is that there is no evidence to support this argument. The vast majority of viruses tend to mutate into LESS deadly or infectious strains, not more deadly. The only mitigating factors would be if a virus was deliberately designed or engineered to mutate in an unnatural manner.
If a virus is designed to mutate into a vastly different and more deadly strain that can attack vaccinated persons, then the vaccine was never useful to begin with, and forced vaccinations are pointless. Once again, if the vaccine is effective, then there is simply no basis for the position that an unvaccinated person puts vaccinated people in danger.
The Conformity Argument
The next argument by pro-forced vaccination people is to ask “why”? Why do you care if you are vaccinated? What do you have to worry about? Just go along to get along, right…?
This argument reminds me of a common anti-gun narrative: Why do you need to carry a gun? Why frighten other people? The chances you will need it are slim, right…?
The most important answer to the gun question is “Because it’s my right to carry and I plan to exercise it. Also, your fear of guns does not take precedence over my constitutional freedoms.” The same goes for forced vaccination: Because it is my right to refuse to have ANY pharmaceutical product injected into my body. Your fears of infection do not matter to my constitutional rights. If you want to take the vaccine, then that is your choice. Leave me out of it.
Arguing about hypothetical threats is a waste of time. I carry a firearm because I have the right to have a means of defense just in case I need it. I refuse vaccinations because I have a right to avoid potential bodily harm just in case I have suspicions of a faulty product.
And is there reason to be concerned about faulty vaccines? Absolutely. Mass vaccinations programs that were rushed to the public have a track record of harming people’s health.
With globalists like Bill Gates, an obsessive champion of depopulation at the forefront of the Covid-19 effort, I have no plans to accept any coronavirus vaccine. Bill Gates has funded numerous experimental vaccine trials through the World Health Organization, including Polio vaccination programs. It was these same programs that led to viral outbreaks of polio in various countries and hundreds of paralyzed children. In fact, the vaccines caused more cases of Polio than the wild-type virus. This if VERIFIED FACT, admitted by the WHO and other mainstream sources, though numerous leftist media outlets continue to deny it.
At most, the WHO and Gates can claim that the infections were “accidental”. But if this is the case, it would still suggest that vaccines developed by Gates Foundation programs and the WHO should not be trusted.
In 1976 a swine flu scare enabled the initiation of a government funded mass vaccination program. The vaccine was faulty and was canceled in less than 10 weeks after causing hundreds of cases of Guillain-Barre syndrome, a rare neurological condition that leads to temporary paralysis and sometimes death.
In 2008, Swiss company Novartis tested a Bird Flu vaccine on the homeless and poor population of Poland. The vaccine trial paid participants $2, and they were told the inoculation was for the “normal flu”. According a homeless center in the area at least 21 people died right after they participated in the trial.
A GlaxoSmithKline executive by the name of Moncef Slaoui was recently tapped by Donald Trump to head up the government’s effort to develop a coronavirus vaccine. This appointment should be highly concerning to the public. Why? Because Glaxo has a dark history in vaccine development, including an incident in Argentina in 2007-2008 when they were fined after a pneumonia vaccine trial allegedly caused the deaths of at least 14 babies. Slaoui was in charge of Glaxo’s vaccine division at the time.
Statists that argue in favor of forced vaccination will dismiss all of these examples as mere “accidents” that are “rare”. Others will claim that fighting the pandemic is worth the risk of a “few deaths” due to some faulty vaccines. But this does not address the core issue of the battle against forced vaccination programs. Does a minority of elites in government or even a majority of useful idiots in the general population have the right to declare ownership of your body in the name of an arbitrary “greater good”? I say no, which is why I will NOT be conforming to any forced vaccine measures and I am willing to take extreme actions to defend myself from them if necessary.
As mentioned above, if a vaccine works, then there is no need to force people to take it. It will protect those that want it and the only risk is to those that choose not to use it. Frankly, the people in charge of the vaccine effort are not to be trusted, they have open ideological agendas that are questionable to say the least. Allowing them to dictate what goes into our bodies is akin to slavery at best, and possible mass death at worst.
* * * * * * * * *
If you would like to support the work that Alt-Market does while also receiving content on advanced tactics for defeating the globalist agenda, subscribe to our exclusive newsletter The Wild Bunch Dispatch. Learn more about it HERE.


thelibertybeacon--2020-06-01--Coronavirus in Italy: “Covid no longer exists, someone is terrorizing the country” – ICU doctor

ER Editor : We bumped into this on Twitter .
An Italian living in the UK , working as a municipal councilor , Francesco Lari , has been publishing Italian articles and videos through his Twitter account .
Below is a translation ( apologies for some roughness – we run these articles through DeepL translator ) of a report from La Repubblica following Dr. Zangrillo ’ s controversial TV appearance this past weekend .
Dr. Alberto Zangrillo is the head doctor and director of ICU at San Raffaele in Milan .
He ’ s calling time on the whole covid @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been terrorized .
This is a successive post from Lari : We ’ ll be following up on this piece and watching for Francesco Lari ’ s interesting tweets .
What do you do when the virus is disappearing ?
Why , you foment race riots and leave piles of bricks in convenient spots where rioters are likely to be !
In the report below , note how the contrary voices to Dr. Zangrillo are essentially saying ‘ oh look , we have far fewer cases because the lockdown measures have worked ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the English-speaking sphere , which we ’ ve published on , have been saying that the virus peaked around March with maximum numbers of deaths following 3 weeks later – meaning it was all over by early April .
Coronavirus , Zangrillo : “ Covid no longer exists , someone is terrorizing the country ” .
Richeldi : “ No , the virus is circulating.
” The head physician at San Raffaele in Milan , director of the intensive care unit : “ It ’ s been three months now that a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have been running .
The member of the scientific technical committee : “ Misleading messages are wrong ” Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior @ @ @ @ @ @ @ educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

ER Editor: We bumped into this on Twitter. An Italian living in the UK, working as a municipal councilor, Francesco Lari, has been publishing Italian articles and videos through his Twitter account. Below is a translation (apologies for some roughness – we run these articles through DeepL translator) of a report from La Repubblica following Dr. Zangrillo’s controversial TV appearance this past weekend. Dr. Alberto Zangrillo is the head doctor and director of ICU at San Raffaele in Milan. He’s calling time on the whole covid charade, declaring that his countrymen have been terrorized.
This is a successive post from Lari:
We’ll be following up on this piece and watching for Francesco Lari’s interesting tweets.
What do you do when the virus is disappearing?
Why, you foment race riots and leave piles of bricks in convenient spots where rioters are likely to be!
In the report below, note how the contrary voices to Dr. Zangrillo are essentially saying ‘oh look, we have far fewer cases because the lockdown measures have worked’. Whereas many independent doctors and epidemiologists in the English-speaking sphere, which we’ve published on, have been saying that the virus peaked around March with maximum numbers of deaths following 3 weeks later – meaning it was all over by early April.
********
Coronavirus, Zangrillo: “Covid no longer exists, someone is terrorizing the country”. Richeldi: “No, the virus is circulating.”
The head physician at San Raffaele in Milan, director of the intensive care unit: “It’s been three months now that a series of numbers that have zero evidence have been running. The member of the scientific technical committee: “Misleading messages are wrong”
LA REPUBBLICA
MILAN – Covid-19 “from a clinical point of view no longer exists”. Alberto Zangrillo, head of the intensive care unit at San Raffaele in Milan, is convinced of this. Words that immediately inflamed controversy among experts, with expressions of bewilderment and condemnation, especially by the scientists who are part of the technical scientific committee.
.
It all started during the more than half hour broadcast on Raitre, when Zangrillo said about his observations on the situation in the Lombardy Region: “I really feel like laughing. Today is the 31st of May and about a month ago we heard epidemiologists say that they were greatly afraid of a new wave by the end of the month/beginning of June, and who knows how many intensive care posts there would be to fill. In reality, the virus practically no longer exists from a clinical point of view.
.
“This – he added – says the University life-health San Raffaele [sic], says a study made by the virologist and director of the Institute of Virology, Professor Clementi, says, together with Emory University in Atlanta, Professor Silvestri. The swabs performed in the last 10 days have an absolutely infinitesimal viral load from a quantitative point of view compared to those performed on patients one month, two months ago. I say this aware of the drama experienced by patients who did not make it, but you cannot continue to bring attention, even in a ridiculous way, giving the word not to clinicians, not to real virologists, but to those who claim to be professors: the virus from a clinical point of view no longer exists”. Lucia Annunziata, the presenter of the broadcast, replied: “That’s a very strong claim you are making, professor. And the clinician replied: “I’ll sign it”.
.
The head physician of San Raffaele continued: “For three months now everyone has been telling us a series of numbers that have zero evidence, that have zero value: we have gone from Borrelli, from Brusaferro, to the president of the Superior Council of Health. All this has led to block Italy while we were working and now we who have seen the drama are asking to be able to leave quickly because we want to cure people who we otherwise cannot cure. We don’t give a damn about the championship or where Italians go on holiday, but we must return to a normal country because there is every evidence that this country can return to a normal life from today”.
.
According to the professor, “there is only one number that is worth” and “it is the evidence: we in this country heard a month ago a professor in Boston, who is an epidemiologist-statistician called Vespignani, influence the government’s choices by saying that 151,000 intensive care units should be built. Tomorrow there will be an editorial by myself and Professor Gattinoni in which we say officially why this is not good, why it is a frenzy, why terrorizing the country is something that someone has to take responsibility for, why our emergency rooms and our intensive care units are empty and why MERS and SARS, the two previous epidemics, have disappeared forever and therefore it is desirable that it also happens for the third coronavirus epidemic. We will have to be very careful, prepare ourselves, but not kill ourselves”.
.
To Zangrillo’s words the pulmonologist Luca Richeldi, member of the Scientific Technical Committee, replied: “The virus is still circulating and it is wrong to give misleading messages that do not invite caution. It is undoubtedly true and reassuring that the pressure on hospitals has been drastically reduced in recent weeks. However, it should not be forgotten that this is the result of the equally drastic measures taken in our country to contain the viral circulation”.
.
Moreover,” says Richeldi, “it is good to remember that viral circulation is a dynamic process, so gradualness and caution in the recovery of economic and social activities must remain our priority. Especially in light of the reopening on 3 June”. “After all, it is enough to see how unfortunately the situation is very different in countries such as Russia, Mexico or India, where – he concludes – these measures could not be so effective and have not given the comforting results we see in our country”.
.
On the same line the director of the National Institute for Infectious Diseases Spallanzani in Rome, Giuseppe Ippolito: at the moment “there is no evidence or published scientific study showing that the new coronavirus SarsCov2 has changed. Fortunately in Italy – he notes – we now have fewer serious cases and this shows that the containment measures adopted have borne fruit”.
. Franco Locatelli, president of the Superior Health Council, is said to be bewildered. “I can only express great surprise and absolute bewilderment at the statements made by Professor Zangrillo with phrases such as ‘the virus clinically no longer exists’ and that ‘Terrorizing the country is something for which someone must take responsibility’. Just look at the number of new cases of positivity to SARS-CoV-2 that are confirmed every day to have demonstration of the persistent circulation of the new coronavirus” ******** Link to article below Coronavirus, Zangrillo: “Il Covid non esiste più, qualcuno terrorizza il paese”. Richeldi: “No, il virus circola” Alberto Zangrillo, primario del San Raffaele di Milano Il primario del San Raffaele di Milano, direttore della terapia intensiva: “Sono tre mesi che sciorinano una serie di numeri che hanno evidenza zero”. Il componente del comitato tecnico scientifico: “Sbagliati i messaggi fuorivianti”
MILANO – Il Covid-19 “dal punto di vista clinico non esiste più”. Ne è convinto il primario del San Raffaele di Milano Alberto Zangrillo, direttore della terapia intensiva. Parole che hanno immediatamente infiammato la polemica tra gli esperti, con espressioni di sconcerto e di condanna soprattutto da parte degli scienziati che fanno parte del comitato tecnico scientifico. Tutto è cominciato durante la trasmissione Mezz’ora in più su Raitre, quando a proposito delle osservazioni sulla situazione della Regione Lombardia, Zangrillo ha detto: “Mi viene veramente da ridere. Oggi è il 31 di maggio e circa un mese fa sentivamo gli epidemiologi dire di temere grandemente una nuova ondata per la fine del mese/inizio di giugno e chissà quanti posti di terapia intensiva ci sarebbero stati da occupare. In realtà il virus, praticamente, dal punto di vista clinico non esiste più”. …. ************
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.