thelibertybeacon--2020-12-19--The “New Confederacy”? It’s Time For Conservatives To Unite Against The Globalist Reset

The “ New Confederacy ” ?
Yes , It ’ s Time For Conservatives To Unite Against The Globalist Reset The narrative could not be more transparent or obvious , but then again , the elites are becoming lazy in their propaganda and the leftists are not all that bright .
Essentially , every time conservatives ( or moderates ) organize to defend themselves against communist or globalist attack we are called “ Nazis ” , brownshirts , populists , bullies , etc .
Now , I would remind these people that if we were really going the path of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intimidation and assault on leftists to the point that they would be afraid to leave their homes or even identify as leftists .
Conservatives believe in self defense , not coercion and terror tactics .
Such actions are the wheelhouse of the political left these days .
They are far better than we are at imitating Brownshirt behavior .
The reality is that across the board the only people engaging in widespread censorship and violence are on the political left , yet we are supposed to be the “ Nazis ” ?
Historically @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pattern here , though .
In Germany in the 1920s-1930s communist groups were highly active and initiated street violence , riots and even assassinations .
This lured many Germans in fear of being overtaken by a communist regime to support national socialism , the other side of the coin when it comes to tyranny .
In other words , to defeat the communists the public supported the fascists , and the fascists ended up being just as bad as the communists .
If you study the investigations of historians like Antony Sutton in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bolshevik Revolution ’ or ‘ Wall Street And The Rise Of Hitler ’ , you will discover there is incredible evidence proving that BOTH the communists and the fascists were funded and managed by the same global elites .
In other words , the bankers win either way because they control both sides of the game .
I do suspect that a similar strategy is being implemented within the US today , and that part of the agenda of globalists hellbent on getting their “ great reset ” is to foment civil war @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sides of the fight .
It is indeed a Catch-22 for conservatives : If we roll over and do nothing , then the extreme left and their corporate and political partners take control of the country and we will never see freedom again as they assert their “ social justice ” mandates along with their lockdown mandates .
If we fight back using the same tactics as the leftists or support martial law , then we ultimately erase the civil liberties protected within the Bill of Rights .
Those rights will NEVER return @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for a second ) and we become history ’ s biggest hypocrites and a cautionary tale of the “ dangers of nationalism ” told to children generations from now , much like the Nazis .
There is , however , another option , and it ’ s not diplomacy .
The establishment likes to make people think there are only ever two choices during any crisis , and both choices involve giving up more freedom or giving government more power .
What they don ’ t want you to consider is the third @ @ @ @ @ @ @ themselves and removing power from those that would abuse it .
Why should we rely on a middleman to enact such measures ?
Why are we always being told that we need to wait for a president or a government to do the job we can do ourselves ?
The liberty movement doesn ’ t revolve around Trump or the election , and it should NEVER rely on martial law as a means to secure our safety .
We can do this on our own without asking permission or waiting to be led @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the political left and conservatives are no longer capable of finding common ground ( except , interestingly , among some moderate liberals that also stand against forced vaccinations and medical mandates ) .
In terms of the hard left , their cult is so far beyond reality now that it would be impossible to reconcile .
They live on another planet and their frothing zealotry is too entrenched for them to ever see reason .
In their delusional fantasies we are the ultimate villains , and they are the “ noble freedom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ single establishment power platform in the corporate world , in Big Tech and in the mainstream media is at their disposal , not to mention millions in funding from globalist organizations like the Open Society Foundation and the Ford Foundation , so this tale of the leftist “ underdog ” makes us double over with laughter at times .
The majority of conservatives just want to be left alone to live our lives the way we see fit .
You know , like real Americans are supposed to do .
But this notion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ argue that we are “ all part of a society ” …THEIR society , and we must abide by their ideologies and rules “ for the greater good ” or suffer the consequences .
In other words , you can check out anytime you like , but you can never leave .
The fact is , groups in general are abstractions of the mind .
Just because someone declares that you are a part of their society does not make it so .
Walking away is every individual ’ s right as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thrive tend to be built on shared values and principles .
They don ’ t all need to agree on every detail , but they can ’ t be diametrically opposed in every way either .
Usually those with principles that match with an inherent sense of conscience are the groups that most appeal to people .
That said , there are people in this world ( around 1 % to 5 % of any given population ) that do NOT have inherent conscience , or they suffer from an ingrained affliction called @ @ @ @ @ @ @ movements that seek to dominate others , and they maintain membership through force rather than appealing to principle .
There is no possible way that this group can ever coexist with people that value freedom and empathy .
At least , not without incredible conflict… There is a large and growing opposition to pandemic lockdown measures , social justice policies that amount to cultural Marxism , as well as the prospect of a Biden presidency which would encourage both of these travesties exponentially .
It ’ s not all about Biden or the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ far beyond them , but many conservatives are looking at the problem more according to what is directly in front of them and less according to the people behind the curtain .
In light of this the mainstream media is doing exactly what is it designed to do – Create propaganda to “ shame ” anyone that dares to oppose the prevailing establishment narrative .
Their most recent strategy is to label the conservative rebellion against the Reset as “ the new Confederacy ” , and to bring up the specter of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the back of discussion among conservatives and state politicians that the possibility of secession should be explored in the wake of the growing impasse between leftists , the globalist agenda , and freedom loving Americans .
The establishment and the useful idiots on the left will have none of it .
Despite the fact that all they talked about during the first two years of Trump ’ s presidency was secession , now that the shoe is on the other foot ( if Biden enters the White House and maybe even if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and their media counterparts are FURIOUS at the idea that conservatives might actually succeed where they failed .
Collectivists are good at destroying things , not creating things .
Their calls for secession were a joke because we all know they are incapable of self sufficiency , and also they have no means of defense .
One look at short lived autonomous zones like “ The CHAZ ” will give you insight to what would happen if leftists tried to separate within a states .
It would be a disaster for them .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the leftists and globalists listen .
They might not ever admit it , but they know we are actually capable of it .
To be clear , what I believe is happening is that conservatives are being prodded and provoked , not to separate and organize but to centralize .
I think they want us to support actions like martial law which would be considered totalitarian .
Conservatives , the only stalwart defenders of civil liberties , using military suppression and abandoning the Bill of Rights to maintain political power ?
That @ @ @ @ @ @ @ globalists in the long term .
And despite people ’ s faith in Trump , there are far too many banking elites and globalists within his cabinet to ensure that such power will not be abused or used against us later .
I think the concept of the “ new confederacy ” label being used by leftists and the media reveals what they truly fear , though : If they can get us to roll over for the lockdowns and medical tyranny and a Biden dictatorship , they ’ re happy .
If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ law under a Trump “ coup ” , they ’ re happy .
But what they don ’ t want is for conservatives and moderates to form their own organizational resistance not beholden to any singular political figure or top down pyramid structure .
Such organization is happening right now .
Millions of liberty minded Americans are leaving leftist counties and states , taking their wealth and businesses with them , and going to more conservative regions where they feel they will be safer .
There has not been an ideological immigration like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a century .
The reality is that conservatives are congregating ( FINALLY ) and they are starting to work together for their own security .
In my own area in Montana I have been running local open meetings on preparedness and current events in the hopes of getting people on the same page and networked in the event that the current crisis spills over and rule of law breaks down .
Or , in the event that there is an attempt by the state or federal government to enforce medical lockdown mandates where @ @ @ @ @ @ @ expanding in the past couple of months and needless to say , people in my town are not going to submit to restrictions and do not plan to hide quietly in their homes while their community and businesses are destroyed .
These groups are forming across the country , and thank God , because without community organization there is ZERO chance of survival or freedom for liberty minded Americans .
As I ’ ve noted in some of my latest articles , the rebellion against lockdowns and vaccination mandates is visible even in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
There is much to be optimistic about .
However , the fight is going to be difficult and there will be ample vitriol leveled against us as we successfully unify .
Organization requires a tit-for-tat philosophy to do well .
Meaning , everyone must take some risk in order to encourage others to join the fight .
For example , conservatives want business owners to refuse to enforce lockdown rules .
But , if a business owner makes this courageous choice and faces off with government health officials , then patriots need @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This might even mean standing in the way of law enforcement that is violating the constitutional rights of that business .
I call this “ creating a wall of worry ” ; many police and sheriffs are not onboard with the enforcement of illegal mandates , but those that are need to understand that there are potential consequences for doing so .
The wall of worry is a deterrent , and the larger the group of people involved the better .
Police are not going to risk escalation of a fight over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could go badly for them .
And , if people in their own departments are against the lockdowns , the consequences double if they seek to enforce them .
They should be the ones worried , not us .
Health Department officials are even less likely to push the issue in the face of opposition .
By extension , if your local sheriff ’ s department or police department is standing against the unconstitutional mandates and the state or federal government threatens them with repercussions , YOU must be there to offer help @ @ @ @ @ @ @ risk for you , so you must be willing to take a risk for them .
I am also hearing considerable chatter that many medical professionals including doctors and nurses are going to REFUSE to take the poorly tested and questionable Covid vaccine for fear of damaging side effects .
And why should they ?
Why take a vaccine for a virus that only threatens less than 0.3 % of the public outside of nursing homes ?
Medical professionals are under immense pressure to take the vaccine or lose their license to practice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rebel against mandatory vaccination .
This means helping them to set up their own clinics outside of the controlled system where they can continue to aid people and still make a living .
This means networking liberty minded patients that need treatments for various ailments to doctors and nurses that will not demand they show a medical passport and will not report them to the government .
This means protecting doctors and nurses from retribution should government officials try to punish or arrest them .
Communities will need to build their own localized @ @ @ @ @ @ @ maybe even creating a local currency scrip ( hopefully backed by some kind of commodity ) .
They are going to have to insulate themselves from the lockdowns economically in order to defy the lockdowns in a practical way .
Otherwise , anyone that does not conform to medical passports and contact tracing will be denied access to the establishment controlled economy and die of poverty .
We have to create alternatives .
We have to offer people a choice outside of tyranny , otherwise many will go along with the tyranny .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ have to provide for their own security .
Regardless of how the election situation actually ends , and even if Trump stays in the White House and refuses to concede , martial law is an unacceptable scenario .
Conservatives don ’ t need it anyway .
We should be establishing localized security ( otherwise known as militias ) composed of any able bodied person in the community that wants to join .
These militias would have to form as unofficial organizations , as it is unlikely that state politicians will sanction them .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t need them to sanction our own security and defense .
Like I said , we can handle it ourselves .
In the meantime , the leftists will label us “ brownshirts ” , but as mentioned they are the people that have proven over and over again to be violent and totalitarian , so their accusations ring hollow .
The media will call us the “ new confederacy ” , which is funny because the majority of the original confederates and slave owners during the Civil War were Democrats .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ point out that people have an inherent right to self defense and to freedom from oppression , and none of us are slave owners .
Anyone that calls for the globalist Reset is an enemy of individual rights , and anyone that tries to enforce medical tyranny is on the wrong side of history and of morality .
They can call us whatever they want and make erroneous historical comparisons until they are blue in the face ; it won ’ t change the fact that we are seeking to be free and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ away .
This is all that matters .

The “New Confederacy”? Yes, It’s Time For Conservatives To Unite Against The Globalist Reset
By: Brandon Smith
The narrative could not be more transparent or obvious, but then again, the elites are becoming lazy in their propaganda and the leftists are not all that bright. Essentially, every time conservatives (or moderates) organize to defend themselves against communist or globalist attack we are called “Nazis”, brownshirts, populists, bullies, etc. Now, I would remind these people that if we were really going the path of the Sturmabteilung then there would be rampant intimidation and assault on leftists to the point that they would be afraid to leave their homes or even identify as leftists. Conservatives believe in self defense, not coercion and terror tactics.
Such actions are the wheelhouse of the political left these days. They are far better than we are at imitating Brownshirt behavior. The reality is that across the board the only people engaging in widespread censorship and violence are on the political left, yet we are supposed to be the “Nazis”?
Historically, there does seem to be a pattern here, though. In Germany in the 1920s-1930s communist groups were highly active and initiated street violence, riots and even assassinations. This lured many Germans in fear of being overtaken by a communist regime to support national socialism, the other side of the coin when it comes to tyranny. In other words, to defeat the communists the public supported the fascists, and the fascists ended up being just as bad as the communists.
If you study the investigations of historians like Antony Sutton in books like ‘Wall Street And The Bolshevik Revolution’ or ‘Wall Street And The Rise Of Hitler’, you will discover there is incredible evidence proving that BOTH the communists and the fascists were funded and managed by the same global elites. In other words, the bankers win either way because they control both sides of the game.
I do suspect that a similar strategy is being implemented within the US today, and that part of the agenda of globalists hellbent on getting their “great reset” is to foment civil war in America while controlling or manipulating both sides of the fight.
It is indeed a Catch-22 for conservatives:
If we roll over and do nothing, then the extreme left and their corporate and political partners take control of the country and we will never see freedom again as they assert their “social justice” mandates along with their lockdown mandates.
If we fight back using the same tactics as the leftists or support martial law, then we ultimately erase the civil liberties protected within the Bill of Rights. Those rights will NEVER return (don’t believe the promises for a second) and we become history’s biggest hypocrites and a cautionary tale of the “dangers of nationalism” told to children generations from now, much like the Nazis.
There is, however, another option, and it’s not diplomacy.
The establishment likes to make people think there are only ever two choices during any crisis, and both choices involve giving up more freedom or giving government more power. What they don’t want you to consider is the third option – The people taking power for themselves and removing power from those that would abuse it.
Why should we rely on a middleman to enact such measures? Why are we always being told that we need to wait for a president or a government to do the job we can do ourselves? The liberty movement doesn’t revolve around Trump or the election, and it should NEVER rely on martial law as a means to secure our safety. We can do this on our own without asking permission or waiting to be led by a mascot.
It is true that the political left and conservatives are no longer capable of finding common ground (except, interestingly, among some moderate liberals that also stand against forced vaccinations and medical mandates). In terms of the hard left, their cult is so far beyond reality now that it would be impossible to reconcile. They live on another planet and their frothing zealotry is too entrenched for them to ever see reason.
In their delusional fantasies we are the ultimate villains, and they are the “noble freedom fighters”. Of course, every single establishment power platform in the corporate world, in Big Tech and in the mainstream media is at their disposal, not to mention millions in funding from globalist organizations like the Open Society Foundation and the Ford Foundation, so this tale of the leftist “underdog” makes us double over with laughter at times.
The majority of conservatives just want to be left alone to live our lives the way we see fit. You know, like real Americans are supposed to do. But this notion is not acceptable to collectivists. They argue that we are “all part of a society”…THEIR society, and we must abide by their ideologies and rules “for the greater good” or suffer the consequences. In other words, you can check out anytime you like, but you can never leave.
The fact is, groups in general are abstractions of the mind. Just because someone declares that you are a part of their society does not make it so. Walking away is every individual’s right as a human being. Groups that survive and thrive tend to be built on shared values and principles. They don’t all need to agree on every detail, but they can’t be diametrically opposed in every way either.
Usually those with principles that match with an inherent sense of conscience are the groups that most appeal to people.
That said, there are people in this world (around 1% to 5% of any given population) that do NOT have inherent conscience, or they suffer from an ingrained affliction called narcissism. These people are attracted to movements that seek to dominate others, and they maintain membership through force rather than appealing to principle. There is no possible way that this group can ever coexist with people that value freedom and empathy. At least, not without incredible conflict…
There is a large and growing opposition to pandemic lockdown measures, social justice policies that amount to cultural Marxism, as well as the prospect of a Biden presidency which would encourage both of these travesties exponentially. It’s not all about Biden or the leftists, obviously. The Reset goes far beyond them, but many conservatives are looking at the problem more according to what is directly in front of them and less according to the people behind the curtain.
In light of this the mainstream media is doing exactly what is it designed to do – Create propaganda to “shame” anyone that dares to oppose the prevailing establishment narrative. Their most recent strategy is to label the conservative rebellion against the Reset as “the new Confederacy”, and to bring up the specter of the Civil War.
This narrative is riding on the back of discussion among conservatives and state politicians that the possibility of secession should be explored in the wake of the growing impasse between leftists, the globalist agenda, and freedom loving Americans.
The establishment and the useful idiots on the left will have none of it. Despite the fact that all they talked about during the first two years of Trump’s presidency was secession, now that the shoe is on the other foot (if Biden enters the White House and maybe even if he doesn’t) the SJWs and their media counterparts are FURIOUS at the idea that conservatives might actually succeed where they failed.
Collectivists are good at destroying things, not creating things. Their calls for secession were a joke because we all know they are incapable of self sufficiency, and also they have no means of defense. One look at short lived autonomous zones like “The CHAZ” will give you insight to what would happen if leftists tried to separate within a states. It would be a disaster for them.
When conservatives talk about separation, though, the leftists and globalists listen. They might not ever admit it, but they know we are actually capable of it.
To be clear, what I believe is happening is that conservatives are being prodded and provoked, not to separate and organize but to centralize. I think they want us to support actions like martial law which would be considered totalitarian. Conservatives, the only stalwart defenders of civil liberties, using military suppression and abandoning the Bill of Rights to maintain political power? That is a dream come true for the globalists in the long term. And despite people’s faith in Trump, there are far too many banking elites and globalists within his cabinet to ensure that such power will not be abused or used against us later.
I think the concept of the “new confederacy” label being used by leftists and the media reveals what they truly fear, though:
If they can get us to roll over for the lockdowns and medical tyranny and a Biden dictatorship, they’re happy. If they can get us to support martial law under a Trump “coup”, they’re happy. But what they don’t want is for conservatives and moderates to form their own organizational resistance not beholden to any singular political figure or top down pyramid structure.
Such organization is happening right now. Millions of liberty minded Americans are leaving leftist counties and states, taking their wealth and businesses with them, and going to more conservative regions where they feel they will be safer. There has not been an ideological immigration like this in the US for well over a century. The reality is that conservatives are congregating (FINALLY) and they are starting to work together for their own security.
In my own area in Montana I have been running local open meetings on preparedness and current events in the hopes of getting people on the same page and networked in the event that the current crisis spills over and rule of law breaks down. Or, in the event that there is an attempt by the state or federal government to enforce medical lockdown mandates where we live. These meetings have been expanding in the past couple of months and needless to say, people in my town are not going to submit to restrictions and do not plan to hide quietly in their homes while their community and businesses are destroyed.
These groups are forming across the country, and thank God, because without community organization there is ZERO chance of survival or freedom for liberty minded Americans. As I’ve noted in some of my latest articles, the rebellion against lockdowns and vaccination mandates is visible even in hard-left states like California and New York. There is much to be optimistic about. However, the fight is going to be difficult and there will be ample vitriol leveled against us as we successfully unify.
Organization requires a tit-for-tat philosophy to do well. Meaning, everyone must take some risk in order to encourage others to join the fight.
For example, conservatives want business owners to refuse to enforce lockdown rules. But, if a business owner makes this courageous choice and faces off with government health officials, then patriots need to be there to back them up. This might even mean standing in the way of law enforcement that is violating the constitutional rights of that business.
I call this “creating a wall of worry”; many police and sheriffs are not onboard with the enforcement of illegal mandates, but those that are need to understand that there are potential consequences for doing so. The wall of worry is a deterrent, and the larger the group of people involved the better. Police are not going to risk escalation of a fight over lockdown mandates if they realize that fight could go badly for them. And, if people in their own departments are against the lockdowns, the consequences double if they seek to enforce them. They should be the ones worried, not us.
Health Department officials are even less likely to push the issue in the face of opposition.
By extension, if your local sheriff’s department or police department is standing against the unconstitutional mandates and the state or federal government threatens them with repercussions, YOU must be there to offer help and support. They are taking a risk for you, so you must be willing to take a risk for them.
I am also hearing considerable chatter that many medical professionals including doctors and nurses are going to REFUSE to take the poorly tested and questionable Covid vaccine for fear of damaging side effects. And why should they? Why take a vaccine for a virus that only threatens less than 0.3% of the public outside of nursing homes?
Medical professionals are under immense pressure to take the vaccine or lose their license to practice. Conservatives MUST defend them if they rebel against mandatory vaccination.
This means helping them to set up their own clinics outside of the controlled system where they can continue to aid people and still make a living. This means networking liberty minded patients that need treatments for various ailments to doctors and nurses that will not demand they show a medical passport and will not report them to the government. This means protecting doctors and nurses from retribution should government officials try to punish or arrest them.
Communities will need to build their own localized economies, using barter and trade and maybe even creating a local currency scrip (hopefully backed by some kind of commodity). They are going to have to insulate themselves from the lockdowns economically in order to defy the lockdowns in a practical way. Otherwise, anyone that does not conform to medical passports and contact tracing will be denied access to the establishment controlled economy and die of poverty. We have to create alternatives. We have to offer people a choice outside of tyranny, otherwise many will go along with the tyranny.
Finally, conservative communities are going to have to provide for their own security. Regardless of how the election situation actually ends, and even if Trump stays in the White House and refuses to concede, martial law is an unacceptable scenario. Conservatives don’t need it anyway. We should be establishing localized security (otherwise known as militias) composed of any able bodied person in the community that wants to join. These militias would have to form as unofficial organizations, as it is unlikely that state politicians will sanction them.
That’s okay. We don’t need them to sanction our own security and defense. Like I said, we can handle it ourselves.
In the meantime, the leftists will label us “brownshirts”, but as mentioned they are the people that have proven over and over again to be violent and totalitarian, so their accusations ring hollow. The media will call us the “new confederacy”, which is funny because the majority of the original confederates and slave owners during the Civil War were Democrats.
We’ll set aside that irony and point out that people have an inherent right to self defense and to freedom from oppression, and none of us are slave owners. Anyone that calls for the globalist Reset is an enemy of individual rights, and anyone that tries to enforce medical tyranny is on the wrong side of history and of morality.
They can call us whatever they want and make erroneous historical comparisons until they are blue in the face; it won’t change the fact that we are seeking to be free and they are seeking to take that freedom away. This is all that matters.
••••
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-20--CNN & Dems call to unleash HELL on Tucker Carlson for ‘trying to kill people’ with vaccine SKEPTICIS

CNN & Dems call to unleash HELL on Tucker Carlson for ‘trying to kill people’ with vaccine SKEPTICISM [Video]

“ How many people did Tucker Carlson try and kill tonight ?
” Rep. Eric Swalwell ( D-California ) tweeted on Friday .
While such a message might seem extreme , it ’ s just one of many reactions to a recent vaccine critique from Carlson .
The lack of debate and conversation , Carlson noted , only hurts potential “ trust ” in the vaccine .
“ Our leaders , ” the Daily Caller founder said , “ are definitely not pro-choice ” when it comes to the vaccine .
“ If you want people to take your vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And if you want them to trust it , you have to let them speak freely about it , ” he said , pointing to a CNN interview with philanthropist Melinda Gates , wife of Bill Gates , where she called for the targeting of vaccine misinformation .
Mainstream media voices struck back fast .
In a Saturday CNN op-ed , former Bill Clinton White House Press Secretary Joe Lockhart encouraged news organizations to mass-attack Carlson and other Fox News hosts for such critiques .
“ The science denial , vaccine skepticism and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pose a clear and present danger to the health of many Americans , ” Lockhart wrote , comparing Carlson ’ s segment to running “ into a crowded theater and [ yelling ] fire , ” an often cited hypothetical often referenced by those citing limitations for free speech in the US .
In an MSNBC segment , Dr. Vin Gupta lambasted Carlson , as well as Sen. Ted Cruz ( R-Texas ) and others , for daring to question the effectiveness of the vaccine .
“ This vaccine is broadly safe , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ICUs .
Sen. Ted Cruz , Tucker Carlson , and those propagating this myth … they haven ’ t cared for patients in the ICU , ” he said .
The Pfizer vaccine , which was over 90 percent effective in trials , began getting distributed last week and various polls have shown skepticism of its effectiveness has slowly eroded , as more and more public figures such as Vice President Mike Pence , as well as Fox News ’ Rupert Murdoch , have taken it .
Among Republicans , however , hesitancy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Foundation poll this week found 42 percent of Republicans would “ probably or definitely not ” take a Covid-19 vaccine .
Minus political leanings , 27 percent of respondents were hesitant to take a vaccine .
( TLB ) published this article from RT-USA News with our appreciation for the coverage .
Top Catholic Cardinal Warns COVID-19 Being Used to Usher in “ Evil ” Great Reset Santa Can not Visit the UK This Year Due to COVID-19 COVID 19 : not so much a pandemic as a Trojan Horse

(RT-USA News)
“How many people did Tucker Carlson try and kill tonight?” Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-California) tweeted on Friday.
How many people did Tucker Carlson try and kill tonight? — Rep. Eric Swalwell (@RepSwalwell) December 19, 2020
While such a message might seem extreme, it’s just one of many reactions to a recent vaccine critique from Carlson.
In a segment on his show, Carlson, one of the president’s more vocal supporters, targeted the “marketing campaign” behind the Pfizer vaccine, noting both reports of allergic reactions to the shots and social media companies cracking down on what they deem to be “misinformation” about it.
Part 1/2: Don’t question the Coronavirus vaccine. pic.twitter.com/haEGpLusth — Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) December 18, 2020
Part 2/2: Don’t question the Coronavirus vaccine. pic.twitter.com/npng6H9JdF — Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) December 18, 2020
The lack of debate and conversation, Carlson noted, only hurts potential “trust” in the vaccine.
“So how are the rest of us supposed to respond to a marketing campaign like this?” he said. “Nervously, if you’re strongly supportive of vaccines, and we are. Even if you recognize how many lives have been saved because of vaccines, and we do. It all seems a bit much, it feels false because it is, it’s too slick.”
“Our leaders,” the Daily Caller founder said, “are definitely not pro-choice” when it comes to the vaccine.
“If you want people to take your vaccine, they must trust your vaccine. And if you want them to trust it, you have to let them speak freely about it,” he said, pointing to a CNN interview with philanthropist Melinda Gates, wife of Bill Gates, where she called for the targeting of vaccine misinformation.
Mainstream media voices struck back fast. In a Saturday CNN op-ed, former Bill Clinton White House Press Secretary Joe Lockhart encouraged news organizations to mass-attack Carlson and other Fox News hosts for such critiques.
Opinion: Tucker Carlson’s vaccine rant should be called out by every reputable news organization https://t.co/crjaWF5cvn — CNN France (@CNNFrancePR) December 19, 2020
“The science denial, vaccine skepticism and falsehoods that are spewed on Fox News pose a clear and present danger to the health of many Americans,” Lockhart wrote, comparing Carlson’s segment to running “into a crowded theater and [yelling] fire,” an often cited hypothetical often referenced by those citing limitations for free speech in the US.
In an MSNBC segment, Dr. Vin Gupta lambasted Carlson, as well as Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and others, for daring to question the effectiveness of the vaccine.
“This vaccine is broadly safe, and this vaccine keeps people out of ICUs. Sen. Ted Cruz, Tucker Carlson, and those propagating this myth … they haven’t cared for patients in the ICU,” he said.
The Pfizer vaccine, which was over 90 percent effective in trials, began getting distributed last week and various polls have shown skepticism of its effectiveness has slowly eroded, as more and more public figures such as Vice President Mike Pence, as well as Fox News’ Rupert Murdoch, have taken it.
Among Republicans, however, hesitancy remains the highest. A Kaiser Family Foundation poll this week found 42 percent of Republicans would “probably or definitely not” take a Covid-19 vaccine. Minus political leanings, 27 percent of respondents were hesitant to take a vaccine.
_________
RELATED FROM RT
*********
(TLB) published this article from RT-USA News with our appreciation for the coverage.
Header featured image credit: PHOTO BY CHIP SOMODEVILLA GETTY IMAGES
Additional from The Liberty Beacon:
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-20--Technocracy & the Great Reset

Technocracy & the Great Reset

In the video below , James Delingpole interviews Patrick Wood , an economist , financial analyst and American constitutionalist who has devoted a lifetime to researching and understanding technocracy — a resource-based economic system created from scratch that really has no equal in terms of what the average person has any understanding of .
Wood has written two fascinating books on this topic : “ Technocracy Rising : The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation ” ( 1 ) and “ Technocracy : The Hard Road to World Order.
” ( 2 ) As explained by Wood , this new economic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one — is not based on common pricing mechanisms such as supply and demand or free commerce .
Instead , the economy of technocracy is based on energy resources , which then dictates the types of products being produced , bought , sold and consumed .
In essence , energy replaces the concept of money as a commodity .
That ’ s strange enough , but it gets stranger still .
Technocracy , which emerged in the 1930s during the height of the Great Depression , the brainchild of which were scientists and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ keep the system working .
Sustainable Development intends to take control of all resources , all production and all consumption on planet earth , leaving all of its inhabitants to be micro-managed by a scientific dictatorship .
~ Patrick Wood If people are allowed to do what they want , consumer demand ultimately drives commerce , but that won ’ t work here .
Instead , consumers need to be directed , herded if you will , to consume that which the system needs them to consume , and in order for that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more or less brainwashed .
As a result , the technocratic system requires extensive surveillance and artificial intelligence-driven technologies to keep everyone in check .
What ’ s more , technocracy seeks to eliminate elected officials and government as a whole .
They have no place in this system which , when fully implemented , would run itself more or less automatically , with input at the top by the technological masterminds .
There ’ s also no room for nations or nationalism that might influence behavior .
As noted by Wood , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Brave New World ” offers a compelling glimpse into technocracy .
There ’ s no political system .
It ’ s all run by engineers and scientists , and the algorithms they create .
As noted in the description for “ Technocracy : The Hard Road to World Order ” : ( 3 ) While the technocratic plan has been underway for decades , things have been rolled out in rapid succession this year .
If you ’ ve formed the impression that we ’ re all suffering from some sort of “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ d probably be right .
Self-evident rights have been stripped from us and people have more or less grown to accept situations that would have been unthinkable a year ago .
We ’ ve been told to work from home and avoid going anywhere .
Our businesses have been shuttered “ to protect public health.
” We ’ ve been told to wear face coverings even while outdoors , while eating and in our own homes .
We ’ re now told we ’ ll have to have vaccine passports if we want @ @ @ @ @ @ @ future , and world leaders are openly talking about the Great Reset .
Now , the central banks were obviously part of this plan too , from the very beginning .
The central bank system is crashing as we speak , having reached the end of its functional life as the global debt burden exceeds countries ’ ability to pay the interest , but the reset they ’ re talking about is not another central bank system .
It will be centralized , yes , but again , the very basis of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ commodity of money to the commodity of energy .
In the interview , Wood explains how the technocratic elite , members of the Trilateral Commission in particular , have influenced and manipulated economic regulations to ensure their success .
As explained by Wood , many of the terms we ’ ve heard more and more of in recent years refer to technocracy under a different name .
Examples include sustainable development , Agenda 21 , the 2030 Agenda , the New Urban Agenda , green economy , the green new deal and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all refer to and are part of technocracy and resource-based economics .
Other terms that are synonymous with technocracy include the Great Reset , ( 4 ) the Fourth Industrial Revolution ( 5 ) and the slogan Build Back Better .
( 6 ) The Paris Climate Agreement is also part and parcel of the technocratic agenda .
The common goal of all these movements and agendas is to capture all of the resources of the world — the ownership of them — for a small global elite group that has the know-how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ultimately dictate the lives of everyone .
It ’ s really the ultimate form of totalitarianism .
When they talk about “ wealth redistribution , ” what they ’ re really referring to , Wood notes , is the redistribution of resources from us to them .
My previous article , “ The Global Takeover Is Underway , ” features a video by the World Economic Forum where they straight up say that by 2030 , you will own nothing .
Everything you need you will rent .
A glimpse into this future @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Forbes article written by an unnamed person from the World Economic Forum Leadership Strategy team .
It reads , in part : ( 7 ) “ Welcome to the year 2030 .
Welcome to my city — or should I say , “ our city.
” I don ’ t own anything .
I don ’ t own a car .
I don ’ t own a house .
I don ’ t own any appliances or any clothes .
It might seem odd to you , but it makes perfect sense for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ considered a product , has now become a service .
We have access to transportation , accommodation , food and all the things we need in our daily lives … In our city we don ’ t pay any rent , because someone else is using our free space whenever we do not need it .
My living room is used for business meetings when I am not there .
Once in a while , I will choose to cook for myself .
It is easy — the necessary kitchen equipment is delivered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
I can ’ t really remember what that is .
For most of us , it has been turned into choosing things to use .
Sometimes I find this fun , and sometimes I just want the algorithm to do it for me .
It knows my taste better than I do by now … The concept of rush hour makes no sense anymore , since the work that we do can be done at any time .
I don ’ t really know if I would call it work anymore .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ and development-time … My biggest concern is all the people who do not live in our city .
Those we lost on the way .
Those who decided that it became too much , all this technology .
Those who felt obsolete and useless when robots and AI took over big parts of our jobs .
Those who got upset with the political system and turned against it .
They live different kind of lives outside of the city .
Some have formed little self-supplying communities .
Others just stayed in the empty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ villages .
Once in a while I get annoyed about the fact that I have no real privacy .
Nowhere I can go and not be registered .
I know that , somewhere , everything I do , think and dream of is recorded .
I just hope that nobody will use it against me .
All in all , it is a good life.
” However , if you rent everything and have no private property of your own , then who does own all of those things ?
The technocratic elite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Disturbingly enough , one form of energy resource that modern technocrats apparently intend to harvest , if patents are any indication , is the human body .
Microsoft ’ s international patent ( 8 ) WO/2020/060606 describes a “ cryptocurrency system using body activity data.
” The international patent was filed June 20 , 2019 .
The U.S. patent office application , ( 9 ) 16128518 , was filed September 21 , 2018 .
As explained in the abstract : ( 10 ) The U.S. patent application includes the following flow chart @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) This patent , if implemented , would essentially turn human beings into robots .
If you ’ ve ever wondered how the average person will make a living in the AI tech-driven cashless world of the future , this may be part of your answer .
People will be brought down to the level of mindless drones , spending their days carrying out tasks automatically handed out by , say a cellphone app , in return for a cryptocurrency “ award.
” This kind of merging of digital and biological systems is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” is all about .
While technocracy used to be an actual private club , the technocrats of today do not necessarily have membership cards , so it can be difficult to correctly identify them all .
Key players , however , are the members of the Trilateral Commission , Wood says .
You can not simply join the Trilateral Commission .
They select their own members , and it ’ s by invitation only .
A list of the members as of 2020 can be found on FredDonaldson.com .
( 12 ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ include David Rockefeller , Henry Kissinger , Michael Bloomberg and Google heavyweights Eric Schmidt and Susan Molinari , vice president for public policy at Google .
Recognizing the necessity of the media , there ’ s also David Ignatius , a columnist for The Washington Post ; David Sanger , chief Washington correspondent for The New York Times ; and Gerald Seib , executive editor at The Wall Street Journal .
It ’ s an interesting list of individuals that can be worth reviewing to get an idea of where , how and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being implemented .
Other groups to look at include : • The Aspen Institute , which has groomed and mentored executives from around the world about the subtleties of globalization .
Many of its board members are also members of the Trilateral Commission • The Brookings Institute and other think-tanks Certain individuals can also be identified by their actions .
Examples given in the interview include Bill Gates and British Prime Minister Boris Johnson .
Once you become familiar with the technocratic agenda , you can start to recognize the players rather easily @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Technocratic Takeover Too Last but not least , the pandemic is part and parcel of the technocrats ’ Great Reset that will usher in a whole new world of unimaginable restrictions on freedom .
It has already accomplished a massive redistribution of wealth — again , from the middle class , from small business owners , to large multinational companies such as Amazon .
Eventually , don ’ t be surprised if you hear talk about providing everyone with a basic income — a step toward the 2030 cashless “ utopia ” where @ @ @ @ @ @ @ forgiveness in return for the forfeiture of all rights to private ownership going forward .
The lockdowns also had the effect of demolishing local economies around the world — an entirely needless manmade situation that is now used as an excuse for why we so desperately need to “ reset ” the economic system , and while we ’ re at it , we should “ build back better.
” Lockdowns and school closings have ushered in calls for more online learning , which locks youths into the digital surveillance matrix to an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as the COVID-19 vaccine is being rolled out , it sets the stage for biometric surveillance , tracking and tracing , which will eventually be tied in with all your other medical records , digital ID , digital banking and a social credit system .
All of this in turn requires 5G , which just so happens to be rolling out in the midst of this pandemic .
Again , once you become more familiar with the technocratic agenda , you ’ ll see how all these seemingly random events are not particularly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , forming a grand net — and we are what ’ s for dinner .
The answer is to , first , educate yourself and others .
I urge you to listen to Wood ’ s interview in its entirety , as he goes over a lot that I have not summarized here .
Once you can see the plan , the next step is to resist and object to any and all implementations of the technocratic agenda .
We can win , for the simple fact that there are more of us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we have to be vocal about it — we need to join forces and present a united front .

Technocracy and the Great Reset
Story at-a-glance
Technocracy is not based on common pricing mechanisms such as supply and demand or free commerce. Instead, the economy of technocracy is based on energy resources, which then dictates the types of products being produced, bought, sold and consumed
Technocracy, the brainchild of which were scientists and engineers, requires social engineering to keep the system working; hence the need for massive data mining and surveillance
Many of the terms we’ve heard more and more of in recent years refer to technocracy under a different name. Examples include sustainable development, Agenda 21, the 2030 Agenda, the New Urban Agenda, green economy, the green new deal and the global warming movement in general. The Paris Climate Agreement is also part and parcel of the technocratic agenda
Other terms that are synonymous with technocracy include the Great Reset, the Fourth Industrial Revolution and Build Back Better
The common goal of all these movements is to capture all the world’s resources for a small global elite that have the know-how to program the computer systems that will come to dictate the lives of everyone. It’s the ultimate form of totalitarianism and the absolute destruction of personal freedom and privacy

In the video below, James Delingpole interviews Patrick Wood, an economist, financial analyst and American constitutionalist who has devoted a lifetime to researching and understanding technocracy — a resource-based economic system created from scratch that really has no equal in terms of what the average person has any understanding of.
Wood has written two fascinating books on this topic: “Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation” (1) and “Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order.” (2)
As explained by Wood, this new economic system — which is not a natural one — is not based on common pricing mechanisms such as supply and demand or free commerce. Instead, the economy of technocracy is based on energy resources, which then dictates the types of products being produced, bought, sold and consumed. In essence, energy replaces the concept of money as a commodity.
That’s strange enough, but it gets stranger still. Technocracy, which emerged in the 1930s during the height of the Great Depression, the brainchild of which were scientists and engineers, also requires social engineering to keep the system working.
Sustainable Development intends to take control of all resources, all production and all consumption on planet earth, leaving all of its inhabitants to be micro-managed by a scientific dictatorship. ~ Patrick Wood
If people are allowed to do what they want, consumer demand ultimately drives commerce, but that won’t work here. Instead, consumers need to be directed, herded if you will, to consume that which the system needs them to consume, and in order for that to happen, they need to be more or less brainwashed. As a result, the technocratic system requires extensive surveillance and artificial intelligence-driven technologies to keep everyone in check.
Technocracy Is Not a Political System
What’s more, technocracy seeks to eliminate elected officials and government as a whole. They have no place in this system which, when fully implemented, would run itself more or less automatically, with input at the top by the technological masterminds. There’s also no room for nations or nationalism that might influence behavior.
As noted by Wood, Aldous Huxley’s dystopian novel “Brave New World” offers a compelling glimpse into technocracy. There’s no political system. It’s all run by engineers and scientists, and the algorithms they create. As noted in the description for “Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order”: (3)
As a resource-based economic system, Sustainable Development intends to take control of all resources, all production and all consumption on planet earth, leaving all of its inhabitants to be micro-managed by a Scientific Dictatorship.
While the technocratic plan has been underway for decades, things have been rolled out in rapid succession this year. If you’ve formed the impression that we’re all suffering from some sort of “boiled frog” syndrome, you’d probably be right.
Self-evident rights have been stripped from us and people have more or less grown to accept situations that would have been unthinkable a year ago. We’ve been told to work from home and avoid going anywhere. Our businesses have been shuttered “to protect public health.”
We’ve been told to wear face coverings even while outdoors, while eating and in our own homes. We’re now told we’ll have to have vaccine passports if we want to get on a flight in the future, and world leaders are openly talking about the Great Reset.
Now, the central banks were obviously part of this plan too, from the very beginning. The central bank system is crashing as we speak, having reached the end of its functional life as the global debt burden exceeds countries’ ability to pay the interest, but the reset they’re talking about is not another central bank system.
It will be centralized, yes, but again, the very basis of the global economy will shift away from the commodity of money to the commodity of energy. In the interview, Wood explains how the technocratic elite, members of the Trilateral Commission in particular, have influenced and manipulated economic regulations to ensure their success.
Sustainable Development, Agenda 21 — It’s All Technocracy
As explained by Wood, many of the terms we’ve heard more and more of in recent years refer to technocracy under a different name. Examples include sustainable development, Agenda 21, the 2030 Agenda, the New Urban Agenda, green economy, the green new deal and the global warming movement in general.
They all refer to and are part of technocracy and resource-based economics. Other terms that are synonymous with technocracy include the Great Reset, (4) the Fourth Industrial Revolution (5) and the slogan Build Back Better. (6) The Paris Climate Agreement is also part and parcel of the technocratic agenda.
The common goal of all these movements and agendas is to capture all of the resources of the world — the ownership of them — for a small global elite group that has the know-how to program the computer systems that will ultimately dictate the lives of everyone. It’s really the ultimate form of totalitarianism.
When they talk about “wealth redistribution,” what they’re really referring to, Wood notes, is the redistribution of resources from us to them. My previous article, “The Global Takeover Is Underway,” features a video by the World Economic Forum where they straight up say that by 2030, you will own nothing. Everything you need you will rent.
Technocracy 2030 — A Glimpse Into the Future
A glimpse into this future was also offered in a November 2016 Forbes article written by an unnamed person from the World Economic Forum Leadership Strategy team. It reads, in part: (7)
“Welcome to the year 2030. Welcome to my city — or should I say, “our city.” I don’t own anything. I don’t own a car. I don’t own a house. I don’t own any appliances or any clothes. It might seem odd to you, but it makes perfect sense for us in this city. Everything you considered a product, has now become a service. We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives … In our city we don’t pay any rent, because someone else is using our free space whenever we do not need it. My living room is used for business meetings when I am not there. Once in a while, I will choose to cook for myself. It is easy — the necessary kitchen equipment is delivered at my door within minutes … Shopping? I can’t really remember what that is. For most of us, it has been turned into choosing things to use. Sometimes I find this fun, and sometimes I just want the algorithm to do it for me. It knows my taste better than I do by now … The concept of rush hour makes no sense anymore, since the work that we do can be done at any time. I don’t really know if I would call it work anymore. It is more like thinking-time, creation-time and development-time … My biggest concern is all the people who do not live in our city. Those we lost on the way. Those who decided that it became too much, all this technology. Those who felt obsolete and useless when robots and AI took over big parts of our jobs. Those who got upset with the political system and turned against it. They live different kind of lives outside of the city. Some have formed little self-supplying communities. Others just stayed in the empty and abandoned houses in small 19th century villages. Once in a while I get annoyed about the fact that I have no real privacy. Nowhere I can go and not be registered. I know that, somewhere, everything I do, think and dream of is recorded. I just hope that nobody will use it against me. All in all, it is a good life.”
However, if you rent everything and have no private property of your own, then who does own all of those things? The technocratic elite that owns all the energy resources does. Disturbingly enough, one form of energy resource that modern technocrats apparently intend to harvest, if patents are any indication, is the human body.
Human Body Activity as an Energy Resource
Microsoft’s international patent (8) WO/2020/060606 describes a “cryptocurrency system using body activity data.” The international patent was filed June 20, 2019. The U.S. patent office application, (9) 16128518, was filed September 21, 2018. As explained in the abstract: (10)
“Human body activity associated with a task provided to a user may be used in a mining process of a cryptocurrency system. A server may provide a task to a device of a user which is communicatively coupled to the server. A sensor communicatively coupled to or comprised in the device of the user may sense body activity of the user. Body activity data may be generated based on the sensed body activity of the user. The cryptocurrency system communicatively coupled to the device of the user may verify if the body activity data satisfies one or more conditions set by the cryptocurrency system, and award cryptocurrency to the user whose body activity data is verified.”
The U.S. patent application includes the following flow chart summary of the process. (11) This patent, if implemented, would essentially turn human beings into robots. If you’ve ever wondered how the average person will make a living in the AI tech-driven cashless world of the future, this may be part of your answer.
People will be brought down to the level of mindless drones, spending their days carrying out tasks automatically handed out by, say a cellphone app, in return for a cryptocurrency “award.” This kind of merging of digital and biological systems is ultimately what “the Fourth Industrial Revolution” is all about.
Who Are the Technocrats? While technocracy used to be an actual private club, the technocrats of today do not necessarily have membership cards, so it can be difficult to correctly identify them all. Key players, however, are the members of the Trilateral Commission, Wood says. You cannot simply join the Trilateral Commission. They select their own members, and it’s by invitation only. A list of the members as of 2020 can be found on FredDonaldson.com. (12) Well-known names in the U.S. Trilateral group include David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Michael Bloomberg and Google heavyweights Eric Schmidt and Susan Molinari, vice president for public policy at Google. Recognizing the necessity of the media, there’s also David Ignatius, a columnist for The Washington Post; David Sanger, chief Washington correspondent for The New York Times; and Gerald Seib, executive editor at The Wall Street Journal. It’s an interesting list of individuals that can be worth reviewing to get an idea of where, how and through whom technocracy is gaining ground and being implemented. Other groups to look at include: The Club of Rome
The Aspen Institute, which has groomed and mentored executives from around the world about the subtleties of globalization. Many of its board members are also members of the Trilateral Commission
The Atlantic Institute
The World Economic Forum
The Brookings Institute and other think-tanks Certain individuals can also be identified by their actions. Examples given in the interview include Bill Gates and British Prime Minister Boris Johnson. Once you become familiar with the technocratic agenda, you can start to recognize the players rather easily. The Pandemic Is Part of the Technocratic Takeover Too Last but not least, the pandemic is part and parcel of the technocrats’ Great Reset that will usher in a whole new world of unimaginable restrictions on freedom. It has already accomplished a massive redistribution of wealth — again, from the middle class, from small business owners, to large multinational companies such as Amazon. Eventually, don’t be surprised if you hear talk about providing everyone with a basic income — a step toward the 2030 cashless “utopia” where you own nothing — and universal debt forgiveness in return for the forfeiture of all rights to private ownership going forward. The lockdowns also had the effect of demolishing local economies around the world — an entirely needless manmade situation that is now used as an excuse for why we so desperately need to “reset” the economic system, and while we’re at it, we should “build back better.” Lockdowns and school closings have ushered in calls for more online learning, which locks youths into the digital surveillance matrix to an even greater extent than before, and as the COVID-19 vaccine is being rolled out, it sets the stage for biometric surveillance, tracking and tracing, which will eventually be tied in with all your other medical records, digital ID, digital banking and a social credit system. All of this in turn requires 5G, which just so happens to be rolling out in the midst of this pandemic. Again, once you become more familiar with the technocratic agenda, you’ll see how all these seemingly random events are not particularly random at all, but weave together, forming a grand net — and we are what’s for dinner. The answer is to, first, educate yourself and others. I urge you to listen to Wood’s interview in its entirety, as he goes over a lot that I have not summarized here. Once you can see the plan, the next step is to resist and object to any and all implementations of the technocratic agenda. We can win, for the simple fact that there are more of us than there are of them, but we have to be vocal about it — we need to join forces and present a united front. Sources and References:
The article Technocracy and the Great Reset was originally created and published by MERCOLA and is republished here with permission and attribution to author Dr. Joseph Mercola and mercola.com. (© Dr. Joseph Mercola) TLB recommends you visit MERCOLA for more great articles and information.
••••
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-20--Great propaganda tricks of today: acting as if . . .

We ’ ve all come across the guy who is flat broke yet acts as if he isnt .
He splashes borrowed money about , drives a Jag bought on tick and if he acts brash enough he convinces everyone he is really well off .
He just brazenly acts as if he ’ s rich until everyone believes him .
Or the bloke who is trying to sell you something and acts as if he is your friend and goes right on acting as if he is your friend right up to the point where he does a bunk @ @ @ @ @ @ @ probably a natural law ( maybe ) that goes , Once you have been rumbled , pretty soon you can wind up bereft of ideas and with “ acting as if ” being all you have left .
The present government is in that “ acting as if ” phase .
Its PCR tests have been exposed as completely fraudulent and consequently its whole premise for lockdowns .
The COVID19 bug is by its stats , performance and so forth known to be no more dangerous than flu and not particularly infectious and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rumbled on just about every front yet it goes right on brazening it out , acting as if the “ deadly ” bug is gon na “ kill us all ” unless we are “ rescued ” by an experimental vaccine that is possibly itself very dangerous but , hey , the deadly virus .
.
.
the infections .
.
.
the threat .
.
.
.
And thus it pins its hopes of not being strung up by a furious citizenry on the dwindling ranks of people who can be fooled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must @ @ @ @ @ @ @

by Kieron McFadden
We’ve all come across the guy who is flat broke yet acts as if he isnt. He splashes borrowed money about, drives a Jag bought on tick and if he acts brash enough he convinces everyone he is really well off. He just brazenly acts as if he’s rich until everyone believes him.
Or the bloke who is trying to sell you something and acts as if he is your friend and goes right on acting as if he is your friend right up to the point where he does a bunk with your life savings.
There is probably a natural law (maybe) that goes,
The more exposed the lie with which you wish to deceive people, the more brazenly you have to act as if it’s true.
Once you have been rumbled, pretty soon you can wind up bereft of ideas and with “acting as if” being all you have left.
The present government is in that “acting as if” phase.
Its PCR tests have been exposed as completely fraudulent and consequently its whole premise for lockdowns.
The COVID19 bug is by its stats, performance and so forth known to be no more dangerous than flu and not particularly infectious and so on.
It has has been rumbled on just about every front yet it goes right on brazening it out, acting as if the “deadly” bug is gonna “kill us all” unless we are “rescued” by an experimental vaccine that is possibly itself very dangerous but, hey, the deadly virus . . . the infections . . . the threat . . . .
And thus it pins its hopes of not being strung up by a furious citizenry on the dwindling ranks of people who can be fooled by bluff and playacting.
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-20--WHO (Finally) Admits PCR Tests Create False Positives – Why This, Why Now?

Warnings concerning high CT value of tests are months too late…so why are they appearing now ?
The potential explanation is shockingly cynical .
ER Editor : We ’ re taking the opportunity here to link to some important articles we ’ ve published on the PCR test .
The World Health Organization released a guidance memo on December 14th , warning that high cycle thresholds on PCR tests will result in false positives .
While this information is accurate , it has also been available for months , so we must ask : why are they reporting it now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the vaccine works ?
The “ gold standard ” Sars-Cov-2 tests are based on polymerase chain reaction ( PCR ) .
PCR works by taking nucleotides – tiny fragments of DNA or RNA – and replicating them until they become something large enough to identify .
The replication is done in cycles , with each cycle doubling the amount of genetic material .
The number of cycles it takes to produce something identifiable is known as the “ cycle threshold ” or “ CT value ” .
The higher the CT value , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ detecting anything significant .
This new WHO memo ( see image ) states that using a high CT value to test for the presence of Sars-Cov-2 will result in false-positive results .
To quote their own words [ our emphasis ] : They go on to explain [ again , our emphasis ] : Of course , none of this is news to anyone who has been paying attention .
That PCR tests were easily manipulated and potentially highly inaccurate has been one of the oft-repeated battle cries of those of us opposing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the policies it ’ s being used to sell .
Many articles have been written about it , by many experts in the field , medical journalists and other researchers .
It ’ s been commonly available knowledge , for months now , that any test using a CT value over 35 is potentially meaningless .
Dr Kary Mullis , who won the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR process , was clear that it wasn ’ t meant as a diagnostic tool , saying : And , commenting on cycle thresholds , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ PCR use state : This has all been public knowledge since the beginning of the lockdown .
The Australian government ’ s own website admitted the tests were flawed , and a court in Portugal ruled they were not fit for purpose Even Dr Anthony Fauci has publicly admitted that a cycle threshold over 35 is going to be detecting “ dead nucleotides ” , not a living virus .
Despite all this , it is known that many labs around the world have been using PCR tests with CT values over 35 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ So why has the WHO finally decided to say this is wrong ?
What reason could they have for finally choosing to recognise this simple reality ?
The answer to that is potentially shockingly cynical : We have a vaccine now .
We don ’ t need false positives anymore .
Notionally , the system has produced its miracle cure .
So , after everyone has been vaccinated , all the PCR tests being done will be done “ under the new WHO guidelines ” , and running only 25-30 cycles instead of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ number of “ positive cases ” will plummet , and we ’ ll have confirmation that our miracle vaccine works .
After months of flooding the data pool with false positives , miscounting deaths “ by accident ” , adding “ Covid19 related death ” to every other death certificate…they can stop .
The create-a-pandemic machine can be turned down to zero again .
…as long as we all do as we ’ re told .
Any signs of dissent – masses of people refusing the vaccine , for example – and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and they bring back their magical disease .

Warnings concerning high CT value of tests are months too late…so why are they appearing now? The potential explanation is shockingly cynical.
ER Editor: We’re taking the opportunity here to link to some important articles we’ve published on the PCR test.
KIT KNIGHTLY
The World Health Organization released a guidance memo on December 14th, warning that high cycle thresholds on PCR tests will result in false positives.
While this information is accurate, it has also been available for months, so we must ask: why are they reporting it now? Is it to make it appear the vaccine works?
The “gold standard” Sars-Cov-2 tests are based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR works by taking nucleotides – tiny fragments of DNA or RNA – and replicating them until they become something large enough to identify. The replication is done in cycles, with each cycle doubling the amount of genetic material. The number of cycles it takes to produce something identifiable is known as the “cycle threshold” or “CT value”. The higher the CT value, the less likely you are to be detecting anything significant.
This new WHO memo (see image) states that using a high CT value to test for the presence of Sars-Cov-2 will result in false-positive results.
To quote their own words [our emphasis]:
Users of RT-PCR reagents should read the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is necessary to account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold (Ct) value result being interpreted as a positive result.
They go on to explain [again, our emphasis]:
The design principle of RT-PCR means that for patients with high levels of circulating virus (viral load), relatively few cycles will be needed to detect virus and so the Ct value will be low. Conversely, when specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.
Of course, none of this is news to anyone who has been paying attention. That PCR tests were easily manipulated and potentially highly inaccurate has been one of the oft-repeated battle cries of those of us opposing the “pandemic” narrative, and the policies it’s being used to sell.
Many articles have been written about it, by many experts in the field, medical journalists and other researchers. It’s been commonly available knowledge, for months now, that any test using a CT value over 35 is potentially meaningless.
Dr Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR process, was clear that it wasn’t meant as a diagnostic tool, saying:
with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.”
And, commenting on cycle thresholds, once said:
If you have to go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is something seriously wrong with your PCR.”
The MIQE guidelines for PCR use state:
Cq values higher than 40 are suspect because of the implied low efficiency and generally should not be reported,”
Even Dr Anthony Fauci has publicly admitted that a cycle threshold over 35 is going to be detecting “dead nucleotides”, not a living virus.
Despite all this, it is known that many labs around the world have been using PCR tests with CT values over 35, even into the low 40s.
So why has the WHO finally decided to say this is wrong? What reason could they have for finally choosing to recognise this simple reality?
The answer to that is potentially shockingly cynical: We have a vaccine now. We don’t need false positives anymore.
Notionally, the system has produced its miracle cure. So, after everyone has been vaccinated, all the PCR tests being done will be done “under the new WHO guidelines”, and running only 25-30 cycles instead of 35+.
Lo and behold, the number of “positive cases” will plummet, and we’ll have confirmation that our miracle vaccine works.
…as long as we all do as we’re told. Any signs of dissent – masses of people refusing the vaccine, for example – and the CT value can start to climb again, and they bring back their magical disease.
************