thelibertybeacon--2020-04-17--Flu Misinformation & Coronavirus Fears: Letter to Dr. Sanjay Gupta

Flu Misinformation and Coronavirus Fears : My Letter to Dr. Sanjay Gupta Last week , your CNN producer , Matthew Reynard , notified me that CNN is featuring me in a documentary about “ vaccine misinformation ” .
As usual , Mr. Reynard did not point out a single factual assertion by me that was incorrect ( I carefully source all of my statements about vaccines to government databases or peer-reviewed publications ) .
CNN uses the term “ vaccine misinformation ” as a euphemism for any statement that departs from the Government / Pharma orthodoxy that all vaccines are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all people .
I respectfully point out that CNN and particularly you , Sanjay , are today among the most prolific broadcasters of ‘ vaccine misinformation.
’ I have always admired you , Sanjay .
Your obvious talents aside , you seem to be genuinely compassionate and to value integrity .
Earlier in your career , you showed a courageous willingness to challenge Big Pharma ’ s vaccine orthodoxies .
However , I respectfully point out that CNN and particularly you , Sanjay , are today among the most prolific broadcasters of “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ several years , I can not recall seeing a single substantial CNN segment on vaccines that did not include easily verified factual misstatements .
CNN ’ s recent special , “ Pandemic ” , was a showcase of erroneous assertions about the flu vaccine .
Since I don ’ t like to think that you deliberately mislead the public—particularly about critical public health choices—I have taken the time to point out some of your most frequent errors .
I hope you will take time to read this .
This critique has special relevance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to mention its important implications for the roles of government and press in a democracy .
CNN and other media outlets treat CDC , NIH , and WHO pronouncements as infallible truths .
In fact , regulatory capture has made these agencies subsidiaries of Big Pharma , and the lies that CDC has been telling us about flu are now muddying the debate over coronavirus .
Furthermore , of the mere 257 cases that could reasonably be blamed on the flu in CDC ’ s mortality data , only 7 percent were laboratory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In your annual flu shot promotions , you routinely parrot CDC ’ s estimates of overall flu deaths which have ranged in recent years from for the 1990-1991 flu season to Fact : The HHS ’ s mortality and morbidity data—available on the National Center for Health Statistics ( NCHS ) website—show that CDC ’ s ( and CNN ’ s ) annual estimates are off by orders of magnitude .
NCHS data report the average number of mortalities attributable to influenza on death certificates is little more than 1,000 .
CDC devises @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deaths with pneumonia deaths .
This device is deceitful since most of these fatalities are unrelated to the flu ( and therefore , impervious to flu vaccines ) .
In 2005 , the British Medical Journal ( BMJ ) Editor , Dr. Peter Doshi , published a comprehensive rebuke of CDC ’ s annual ritual of exaggerating flu mortalities entitled “ Dissecting CDC ’ s Deception : Are US Flu Death Figures More PR Than Science ?
” Doshi accuses the CDC of purposefully inflating flu deaths to frighten the public into purchasing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chicanery , Doshi observed that CDC ’ s announced number of reported pneumonia and influenza deaths in 2001 at 62,034 .
Yet less than half of one percent of those were actually attributed to influenza .
Furthermore , of the mere 257 cases that could reasonably be blamed on the flu in CDC ’ s mortality data , only 7 percent were laboratory confirmed cases of influenza .
That ’ s 18 lab confirmed influenza cases out of 62,034 “ pneumonia and influenza ” deaths—or just 0.03 percent , according to HHS ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( NCHS ) .
Subtracting pneumonia , the true number of influenza-associated deaths from 1979 to 2002 averaged 1,348 , according to the NCHS data .
CNN routinely reports figures forty times this number .
Dr. Doshi charges the CDC with deliberately lying about annual flu deaths to “ [ work ] in manufacturers ’ interest by conducting campaigns to increase flu vaccination ” .
He warns that “ by arbitrarily linking flu with pneumonia , current data are statistically biased.
” By faithfully parroting CDC inflated numbers—with no due diligence—CNN has made @ @ @ @ @ @ @ making it difficult now to accurately assess the relative risk of COVID-19 as compared to flu and , therefore , rationally measure an appropriate response .
… 2010 meta-analysis of published influenza vaccine studies found that the influenza vaccination has no effect on hospitalization , and that there is no evidence that vaccines prevent viral transmission or complications .
• None for everyone older than 6 months , proclaiming that the best way to protect against serious cases of the ailment “ is to get a flu shot Fact : In reality , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the CDC ’ s assertion that the influenza vaccine is the most effective way to prevent the flu .
The Cochrane Collaboration ’ s comprehensive 2010 meta-analysis of published influenza vaccine studies found that the influenza vaccination has “ no effect ” on hospitalization , and that there is “ no evidence that vaccines prevent viral transmission or complications.
” The Cochrane Researchers concluded in 2010 that the scientific evidence “ seem [ s ] to discourage the utilization of vaccination against influenza in healthy adults as a routine public health measure.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ follow-up meta-review including dozens of more recent scientific studies and again concluded bluntly that the body of scientific data provides “ no evidence for the utilization of vaccination against influenza in healthy adults as a routine public health measure.
” In other words , despite CNN ’ s relentless hectoring , there is no scientific evidence that all the billions of dollars America spends on influenza vaccination each year actually provides any health benefit , much less a net economic benefit—apart from the financial windfall to the four pharmaceutical companies that manufacture these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s top advertisers .
… [ a study published in PNAS ] found that influenza vaccination actually increased transmission of the virus , with vaccinated individuals shedding more than six times as much aerosolized virus in their breath than unvaccinated individuals .
• None that a flu shot reduces the chances that an individual will transmit the flu to others .
repeated this assertion .
CNN offers this supposed benefit as the justification for school vaccine mandates .
Fact : However , in their 2010 systematic meta review of the literature , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that vaccines prevent viral transmission or complications ” .
Even more worrisome , a study from January 18 , 2018 , in the Journal of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , PNAS , found that influenza vaccination actually increased transmission of the virus , with vaccinated individuals shedding more than six times as much aerosolized virus in their breath than unvaccinated individuals .
Those scientists were not altogether surprised by this finding explaining that “ certain types of prior immunity ” —in this case @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the vaccine as opposed to naturally acquired immunity— “ promote lung inflammation , airway closure , and aerosol generation.
” They conclude that , “ If confirmed , this observation , together with recent literature suggesting reduced protection with annual vaccination , would have implications for influenza vaccination recommendations and policies.
” • None children should get the flu shot , which you assure CNN ’ s audience has been proven safe .
Fact : A 2012 Cochrane review looking at studies of influenza vaccination in healthy children found no safety studies in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that safety studies were “ urgently required ” .
Every influenza vaccine package insert contains warnings about the lack of safety studies in pregnant women and nursing mothers .
• None that all pregnant women get a flu shot .
Fact : CDC recommends the flu shot for pregnant women despite the fact that FDA—the agency charged with assessing vaccine safety—has refused to license the flu shot during pregnancy due to grave safety concerns .
( Sanjay ; I encourage you to confront FDA and make inquiries about this inter-agency conflict . )
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ about the lack of safety studies in pregnant women and nursing mothers .
A 2014 Cochrane review found that the number of randomized , placebo-controlled trials examining the safety and effectiveness of vaccinating pregnant women was zero .
A 2019 article by Alberto Donzelli in Human Vaccination & Immunotheraputics , asks the question , “ Influenza vaccination for all pregnant women ?
” and argues , “ So far the less biased evidence does not favour it ” .
Donelli found that public health recommendations on flu shots during pregnancy had systematically overestimated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ —and that the published science showed “ an excess of local adverse effects and a tendency for serious adverse events with uncertain or very limited protection against influenza ” .
Donzelli observes that flu vaccine trials in Africa and Asia have shown excessive infection and deaths in infants associated with flu shots during pregnancy .
Although the vaccination rate for elderly people had increased by as much as 67 percent from 1989 to 1997 , there was no evidence that vaccination reduced hospitalizations or deaths .
On the contrary , mortality and hospitalization @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
• None CNN urges seniors to get their flu shots with a dramatic reduction in influenza-related deaths among the elderly .
Fact : The scientific community has thoroughly debunked CDC ’ s claims that the flu shot reduces death among seniors .
Researchers from the National Institutes of Health ( NIH ) ridicule CDC ’ s mortality claims in a study published in April 2005 in Archives of Internal Medicine ( now JAMA Internal Medicine ) .
Those NIH researchers pointed out that , despite a dramatic increase in vaccination coverage among @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 20 percent before 1980 to 65 percent in 2001—pneumonia and influenza mortality rates “ rose substantially during this period ” .
The lead author of the 2005 NIH study , Lone Simonsen , was also coauthor with W. Paul Glezen of a 2006 commentary in the International Journal of Epidemiology that reiterated the problems with the CDC ’ s claims .
“ Although the vaccination rate for elderly people had increased by as much as 67 percent from 1989 to 1997 , there was no evidence that vaccination reduced hospitalizations or deaths .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ hospitalization rates continued to increase rather than decline ” .
The 2005 NIH study authors commented that this result was “ surprising ” since vaccination was supposed to be “ highly effective at reducing influenza-related mortality ” —an assumption underlying CDC policy that “ has never been studied in clinical trials ” .
Similarly , a 2008 review in Virology Journal , observes that contrary to the CDC ’ s claims of a great beneficial effect on mortality , “ influenza mortality and hospitalization rates for older Americans significantly increased in the 80s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that influenza vaccination rates for elderly Americans dramatically increased.
” In a 2013 BMJ commentary , Dr. Doshi asked , “ what evidence is there that influenza vaccines reduce deaths of older people—the reason the policy was originally created ?
Virtually none… ” This means that influenza vaccines are approved for use in older people despite any clinical trials demonstrating a reduction in serious outcomes.
” “ Perhaps most perplexing , ” Doshi added , “ is officials ’ lack of interest in the absence of good quality evidence.
” • None that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and significant side effects are very rare.
” Fact : Actual injury rates are impossible to determine since flu shots are exempt from pre-and-post-marketing placebo studies required of other medicines , and because HHS ’ s post-marketing surveillance system , the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System [ VAERS ] , captures “ fewer than 1 % of vaccine injuries ” according to a 2010 HHS-funded study .
Nevertheless , some alarming metrics ought to give you pause when you offer these assurances to millions of viewers ; Flu vaccines account for nearly ¼ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Injury Compensation Fund ( VICA ) .
The Vaccine Court has paid out nearly $ 1 billion for injuries and deaths caused by flu shots .
GSK ’ s vaccine , Flulaval lists , on its manufacturing inserts , over 45 chronic diseases and adverse reactions that FDA believes may be linked to the vaccine .
These include a long menu of immune system , allergic , musculoskeletal , psychiatric , respiratory , skin , vascular , and neurological disease including seizure , paralysis , and syncope .
Australian data link the influenza @ @ @ @ @ @ @ season to a 1-in-110 risk in children of having febrile convulsions .
The pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccine in Europe was associated with a 1-in-55,000 risk of developing narcolepsy .
CDC acknowledges that the Pandemrix flu vaccine is associated with an “ increased risk of narcolepsy ” .
A 2015 meta-analysis published in the journal Vaccine has acknowledged “ a small but statistically significant association between influenza vaccines , particularly the pandemic ones , and Guillen-Barre Syndrome ( GBS ) ” .
A 2004 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the most frequent neurological condition reported after influenza vaccination to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System ( VAERS ) ” .
The 2010 Cochrane meta-analysis chided that the post-mortality studies found that a statistically significant association between the influenza vaccine and GBS “ demonstrate the danger of commencing a large vaccination campaign without adequate harms assessment.
” … the flu shot increases the risks from coronavirus by 36 % .
• None On March 5 , 2020 , you and Anderson Cooper did a “ Town Hall ” segment , “ ” , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get the flu shot as the best way to keep healthy during the coronavirus pandemic .
According to Anderson , “ If you are concerned about coronavirus , you should get a flu shot ” .
Fact : However , the only study we have been able to find assessing flu shots and coronavirus is a January 2020 US Pentagon study that found that the flu shot INCREASES the risks from coronavirus by 36 % .
“ Receiving influenza vaccination may increase the risk of other respiratory viruses , a phenomenon known as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus… ” Many studies suggest the flu vaccine increases vulnerability to both flu infections and the remaining 85 % -93 % of non-flu respiratory infections .
• None assuring the public that getting the flu shot can not increase one ’ s chances of getting the flu .
Fact : While that assertion has some meager support from a very small number of studies , the overwhelming weight of published science suggests that getting an annual flu shot can actually increase your risk of both flu and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to 15 percent of what are called “ influenza-like illnesses ” are actually caused by influenza viruses .
Many studies suggest the flu vaccine increases vulnerability to both flu infections and the remaining 85 % -93 % of non-flu respiratory infections .
A 2011 study of healthy Australian children published in the Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal found that seasonal flu shots increase the risk of flu by 73 % and doubled the risk of non-flu respiratory infections .
Similarly , another 2012 randomized controlled trial published in Clinical Infectious Diseases found that influenza-vaccinated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ influenza and also a higher risk of infection from non-influenza viruses .
Furthermore , the flu vaccine depletes capacity to fight off future flu infections .
In April 2010 , a study ( by Skowronek , et al ) published in the journal PLoS Medicine reported the “ unexpected ” finding from four epidemiologic studies in Canada that receipt of the influenza vaccine for the 2008 – 2009 season , while apparently effective in reducing the risk of illness due to the seasonal flu , was associated with an increased risk of illness @ @ @ @ @ @ @ H1N1 ) “ swine flu ” virus during the spring and summer of 2009 .
The scientists suggested that this finding could be due to the difference in the way the vaccine affects the immune system compared with natural infection .
Under this hypothesis , repeated vaccination “ effectively blocks the more robust , complex , and cross-protective immunity afforded by prior infection.
” When unvaccinated people are infected with the seasonal influenza virus , they often develop a robust cell-mediated immunity that not only protects against that strain of the virus but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ People who ’ ve annually received the influenza vaccine , on the other hand , “ may have lost multiple opportunities for infection-induced cross-immunity.
” This is because the vaccine is designed to stimulate a strong antibody response , or humoral immunity , but does not confer the same kind of robust cell-mediated immunity as natural infection .
NIH researchers in their 2005 study also acknowledged the superior effectiveness of naturally acquired immunity at reducing mortality , pointing out that senior citizens who contracted the H3N2 influenza pandemic infection demonstrated a robust immunity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccinated individuals .
The sharp decline in influenza-related deaths among people aged 65 to 74 years in the years immediately after the 1968 flu pandemic was most likely due to the acquisition of natural immunity to these viruses ( from natural infections ) .
Another study published in 2011 in the Journal of Virology confirmed that annual influenza vaccination indeed hampers the development of a robust cell-mediated immunity .
Annual vaccination for influenza , the authors concluded , “ may render young children who have not previously been infected with an influenza virus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ influenza virus of a novel subtype.
” A 2018 CDC study found there was an increase of acute respiratory infections caused by non-influenza respiratory pathogens following influenza vaccination compared to unvaccinated children during the same period .
The authors recommended that potential mechanisms for this association warrant further investigation .
While most studies have looked at only one or two flu seasons , a CDC-funded study published in September 2014 in Clinical Infectious Diseases considered the long-term effects of repeated annual vaccination by looking at five years of vaccination data .
The CDC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had been vaccinated in prior years , the less effective the vaccine are at preventing the most recent season ’ s dominant H3N2 virus .
As they put it , “ vaccine-induced protection was greatest for individuals not vaccinated during the prior 5 years.
” Essentially , the immune system remembers the original infection and puts out a rapid defense against it , at the expense of developing a new but more appropriate response specifically to the currently infecting strain .
The CDC scientists warned that their data “ raises relevant questions about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccination and possible residual protection from previous season vaccination ” ; the authors called for further studies .
• None One final observation about a different vaccine ; In CNN ’ s regular promotion of measles vaccines , that natural measles mortalities are 1-2 in 1000 .
Those estimates seem calculated to frighten people into taking a measles shot and to drive MMR mandates .
Fact : CDC ’ s 1963 mortality and morbidity data show that prior to the introduction of the measles vaccine , improvements in nutrition and hygeine had already @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 400 per year , a population ratio of 1/500,000 and a death-case ratio of 1 in 10,000—about the same risk of dying from a lightning strike .
Most of those mortalities were among malnourished children , many of whom suffered from intellectual disabilities .
The best evidence suggests that measles mortalities would have continued to drop with the introduction of food stamps , W.I.C , and other childhood nutritional programs passed during the War on Poverty after 1964 to relieve hunger in impoverished communities .
In their 2010 meta-analysis , the Cochrane researchers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ science in order to support their universal influenza vaccination recommendation .
Nevertheless , CNN continually broadcasts CDC pronouncements as gospel and , ironically , ridicules those of us who actually read the science as “ purveyors of ‘ vaccine misinformation ’ ” .
Multiple comprehensive federal investigations and whistleblower declarations have documented the corrupt relationship between the CDC ’ s Vaccine Branch and the four vaccine makers : Merck , Pfizer , Sanofi , and GSK .
These include a 2000 report by the US Congress Government Oversight Committee , a 2009 report @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a 2014 letter by David Wright , Director of HHS Office of Research Integrity , and a 2011 letter to Carmen S. Villar , chief of staff for Tom Frieden , from an organization of CDC scientists calling itself “ SPIDER ” .
In 2014 , CDC ’ s senior vaccine safety scientist , Dr. William Thompson , a 17-year CDC veteran , who continues to work for CDC , confessed in a series of depositions , and public and private statements , that his CDC bosses in CDC ’ s Immunization Branch @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to destroy data and falsify study outcomes to hide CDC research linking vaccines to the exploding epidemic of childhood chronic diseases including autism .
Doesn ’ t the abundant evidence of corruption at the Federal health agencies amplify CNN ’ s obligation to treat government pronouncements with skepticism ?
[ The CDC ] stressed that it was especially important to inspire “ concern , anxiety , and worry ” among young , healthy adults who don ’ t regard the flu with sufficient dread .
At a 2004 workshop for the Institute of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the agency ’ s annual campaigns of fear and deception in a PowerPoint entitled “ ‘ Recipe ’ for Fostering Public Interest and High Vaccine Demand ” .
CDC ’ s in-house P.R .
flack Glen Nowak explained that it was necessary to use fear marketing to sell vaccines .
CDC ’ s campaign called for encouraging television medical experts ( like Sanjay and Elizabeth Cohen ) to “ state concern and alarm ” about “ and predict dire outcomes ” from the flu season .
To inspire the necessary terror , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to describe each season as “ very severe ” , “ more severe than last or past years ” , and “ deadly ” .
CDC ’ s press flacks stressed that it was especially important to inspire “ concern , anxiety , and worry ” among young , healthy adults who don ’ t regard the flu with sufficient dread .
As the CDC bluntly stated it , “ Health literacy is a growing problem ” .
In other words , the CDC considers it to be a problem that people are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more adept at educating themselves about health-related issues ; Why ?
Because people who do their own research , read the science , and make informed choices rather than blindly following the CDC ’ s recommendations are less likely to get the flu shot .
“ Drug companies ” , Dr. Doshi observes , “ have long known that to sell some products , you would have to first sell people on the disease.
” Only , in the case of the influenza vaccine , Doshi adds , “ the salesmen are public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ officials have , in turn , transformed trusted journalists and television doctors into Pharma marketing reps. CNN likes to portray CDC ’ s annual flu shot campaigns as an important public health ritual .
The peer-reviewed science exposes CDC ’ s campaigns as a mercantile propaganda project that is costly and may be injuring public health .
CNN can fault CDC officials as the source of its “ vaccine misinformation ” .
But this is a weak gesture .
“ People in power lie ” , my father once told me .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and skepticism to the pronouncements of government officials and powerful corporations .
Finally , Sanjay , you and Anderson Cooper often comment with dismay on the monumental tragedy , for our democracy , of having a president who habitually lies .
But presidents come and go ; the more enduring tragedy , arguably , is that we can not trust our news media to tell us the truth about vital health issues when advertising dollars are at stake .
You scratch your head and wonder how all those Trump supporters don ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s mendacity .
One answer is that they are disheartened by once-trusted media outlets who have also set the precedent of routinely lying and violating the public trust , wounding in the process our democracy , public faith in critical institutions , and the health of our children .
P.S .
Just as a reminder , here is a 60 Minutes program from over 30 years ago .
This is what journalism looked like before Pharma purchased the media .

Flu Misinformation and Coronavirus Fears: My Letter to Dr. Sanjay Gupta
By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Chairman, Children’s Health Defense
Dear Sanjay,
Last week, your CNN producer, Matthew Reynard, notified me that CNN is featuring me in a documentary about “vaccine misinformation”. As usual, Mr. Reynard did not point out a single factual assertion by me that was incorrect (I carefully source all of my statements about vaccines to government databases or peer-reviewed publications). CNN uses the term “vaccine misinformation” as a euphemism for any statement that departs from the Government / Pharma orthodoxy that all vaccines are safe, necessary, and effective for all people.
I respectfully point out that CNN and particularly you, Sanjay, are today among the most prolific broadcasters of ‘vaccine misinformation.’
I have always admired you, Sanjay. Your obvious talents aside, you seem to be genuinely compassionate and to value integrity. Earlier in your career, you showed a courageous willingness to challenge Big Pharma’s vaccine orthodoxies. However, I respectfully point out that CNN and particularly you, Sanjay, are today among the most prolific broadcasters of “vaccine misinformation”. Over the last several years, I cannot recall seeing a single substantial CNN segment on vaccines that did not include easily verified factual misstatements. CNN’s recent special, “Pandemic”, was a showcase of erroneous assertions about the flu vaccine. Since I don’t like to think that you deliberately mislead the public—particularly about critical public health choices—I have taken the time to point out some of your most frequent errors.
I hope you will take time to read this. This critique has special relevance during the current coronavirus crisis, not to mention its important implications for the roles of government and press in a democracy. CNN and other media outlets treat CDC, NIH, and WHO pronouncements as infallible truths. In fact, regulatory capture has made these agencies subsidiaries of Big Pharma, and the lies that CDC has been telling us about flu are now muddying the debate over coronavirus.
Furthermore, of the mere 257 cases that could reasonably be blamed on the flu in CDC’s mortality data, only 7 percent were laboratory confirmed cases of influenza.
CNN assertion: In your annual flu shot promotions, you routinely parrot CDC’s estimates of overall flu deaths which have ranged in recent years from 36,000 for the 1990-1991 flu season to 80,000 for the 2017-2018 flu season.
Fact: The HHS’s mortality and morbidity data—available on the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) website—show that CDC’s (and CNN’s) annual estimates are off by orders of magnitude.
NCHS data report the average number of mortalities attributable to influenza on death certificates is little more than 1,000. CDC devises its inflated estimate by deliberately conflating flu deaths with pneumonia deaths. This device is deceitful since most of these fatalities are unrelated to the flu (and therefore, impervious to flu vaccines). In 2005, the British Medical Journal (BMJ) Editor, Dr. Peter Doshi, published a comprehensive rebuke of CDC’s annual ritual of exaggerating flu mortalities entitled “Dissecting CDC’s Deception: Are US Flu Death Figures More PR Than Science?” Doshi accuses the CDC of purposefully inflating flu deaths to frighten the public into purchasing vaccines. To illustrate CDC’s chicanery, Doshi observed that CDC’s announced number of reported pneumonia and influenza deaths in 2001 at 62,034. Yet less than half of one percent of those were actually attributed to influenza. Furthermore, of the mere 257 cases that could reasonably be blamed on the flu in CDC’s mortality data, only 7 percent were laboratory confirmed cases of influenza. That’s 18 lab confirmed influenza cases out of 62,034 “pneumonia and influenza” deaths—or just 0.03 percent, according to HHS’s own National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS).
Subtracting pneumonia, the true number of influenza-associated deaths from 1979 to 2002 averaged 1,348, according to the NCHS data. CNN routinely reports figures forty times this number.
Dr. Doshi charges the CDC with deliberately lying about annual flu deaths to “[work] in manufacturers’ interest by conducting campaigns to increase flu vaccination”. He warns that “by arbitrarily linking flu with pneumonia, current data are statistically biased.”
By faithfully parroting CDC inflated numbers—with no due diligence—CNN has made itself complicit in this annual charade, making it difficult now to accurately assess the relative risk of COVID-19 as compared to flu and, therefore, rationally measure an appropriate response.
… 2010 meta-analysis of published influenza vaccine studies found that the influenza vaccination has no effect on hospitalization, and that there is no evidence that vaccines prevent viral transmission or complications.
CNN assertion: CNN routinely promotes the flu shot for everyone older than 6 months, proclaiming that the best way to protect against serious cases of the ailment “ is to get a flu shot ”.
Fact: In reality, there is absolutely no scientific basis for the CDC’s assertion that the influenza vaccine is the most effective way to prevent the flu.
The Cochrane Collaboration’s comprehensive 2010 meta-analysis of published influenza vaccine studies found that the influenza vaccination has “no effect” on hospitalization, and that there is “no evidence that vaccines prevent viral transmission or complications.”
The Cochrane Researchers concluded in 2010 that the scientific evidence “seem[s] to discourage the utilization of vaccination against influenza in healthy adults as a routine public health measure.”
Four years later, Cochrane published a follow-up meta-review including dozens of more recent scientific studies and again concluded bluntly that the body of scientific data provides “no evidence for the utilization of vaccination against influenza in healthy adults as a routine public health measure.”
In other words, despite CNN’s relentless hectoring, there is no scientific evidence that all the billions of dollars America spends on influenza vaccination each year actually provides any health benefit, much less a net economic benefit—apart from the financial windfall to the four pharmaceutical companies that manufacture these vaccines—and who happen to be among CNN’s top advertisers.
…[a study published in PNAS] found that influenza vaccination actually increased transmission of the virus, with vaccinated individuals shedding more than six times as much aerosolized virus in their breath than unvaccinated individuals.
CNN assertion: You and CNN frequently parrot CDC’s claim that a flu shot reduces the chances that an individual will transmit the flu to others. Pandemic repeated this assertion. CNN offers this supposed benefit as the justification for school vaccine mandates.
Fact: However, in their 2010 systematic meta review of the literature, the Cochrane researchers found “no evidence that vaccines prevent viral transmission or complications”.
Even more worrisome, a study from January 18, 2018, in the Journal of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, PNAS, found that influenza vaccination actually increased transmission of the virus, with vaccinated individuals shedding more than six times as much aerosolized virus in their breath than unvaccinated individuals.
Those scientists were not altogether surprised by this finding explaining that “certain types of prior immunity”—in this case, the kind of immunity conferred by the vaccine as opposed to naturally acquired immunity— “promote lung inflammation, airway closure, and aerosol generation.” They conclude that, “If confirmed, this observation, together with recent literature suggesting reduced protection with annual vaccination, would have implications for influenza vaccination recommendations and policies.”
CNN assertion: CNN frequently repeats CDC’s advice that children should get the flu shot, which you assure CNN’s audience has been proven safe.
Fact: A 2012 Cochrane review looking at studies of influenza vaccination in healthy children found no safety studies in children under age two, and declared that safety studies were “urgently required”.
Every influenza vaccine package insert contains warnings about the lack of safety studies in pregnant women and nursing mothers.
CNN assertion : CNN also promotes CDC’s recommendation that all pregnant women get a flu shot.
Fact: CDC recommends the flu shot for pregnant women despite the fact that FDA—the agency charged with assessing vaccine safety—has refused to license the flu shot during pregnancy due to grave safety concerns. (Sanjay; I encourage you to confront FDA and make inquiries about this inter-agency conflict.) Every influenza vaccine package insert contains warnings about the lack of safety studies in pregnant women and nursing mothers.
A 2014 Cochrane review found that the number of randomized, placebo-controlled trials examining the safety and effectiveness of vaccinating pregnant women was zero.
A 2019 article by Alberto Donzelli in Human Vaccination & Immunotheraputics, asks the question, “Influenza vaccination for all pregnant women?” and argues, “So far the less biased evidence does not favour it”. Donelli found that public health recommendations on flu shots during pregnancy had systematically overestimated “the vaccine effectiveness and safety”—and that the published science showed “an excess of local adverse effects and a tendency for serious adverse events with uncertain or very limited protection against influenza”. Donzelli observes that flu vaccine trials in Africa and Asia have shown excessive infection and deaths in infants associated with flu shots during pregnancy.
Although the vaccination rate for elderly people had increased by as much as 67 percent from 1989 to 1997, there was no evidence that vaccination reduced hospitalizations or deaths. On the contrary, mortality and hospitalization rates continued to increase rather than decline.
Fact: The scientific community has thoroughly debunked CDC’s claims that the flu shot reduces death among seniors.
Researchers from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) ridicule CDC’s mortality claims in a study published in April 2005 in Archives of Internal Medicine (now JAMA Internal Medicine). Those NIH researchers pointed out that, despite a dramatic increase in vaccination coverage among people aged 65 or older—from at most 20 percent before 1980 to 65 percent in 2001—pneumonia and influenza mortality rates “rose substantially during this period”.
The lead author of the 2005 NIH study, Lone Simonsen, was also coauthor with W. Paul Glezen of a 2006 commentary in the International Journal of Epidemiology that reiterated the problems with the CDC’s claims. “Although the vaccination rate for elderly people had increased by as much as 67 percent from 1989 to 1997, there was no evidence that vaccination reduced hospitalizations or deaths. On the contrary, “mortality and hospitalization rates continued to increase rather than decline”.
The 2005 NIH study authors commented that this result was “surprising” since vaccination was supposed to be “highly effective at reducing influenza-related mortality”—an assumption underlying CDC policy that “has never been studied in clinical trials”.
Similarly, a 2008 review in Virology Journal, observes that contrary to the CDC’s claims of a great beneficial effect on mortality, “influenza mortality and hospitalization rates for older Americans significantly increased in the 80s and 90s, during the same time that influenza vaccination rates for elderly Americans dramatically increased.”
In a 2013 BMJ commentary, Dr. Doshi asked, “what evidence is there that influenza vaccines reduce deaths of older people—the reason the policy was originally created? Virtually none…” This means that influenza vaccines are approved for use in older people despite any clinical trials demonstrating a reduction in serious outcomes.”
“Perhaps most perplexing,” Doshi added, “is officials’ lack of interest in the absence of good quality evidence.”
CNN assertion: You frequently inform the CNN audience that “the flu vaccine is safe, and significant side effects are very rare.”
Fact: Actual injury rates are impossible to determine since flu shots are exempt from pre-and-post-marketing placebo studies required of other medicines, and because HHS’s post-marketing surveillance system, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System [VAERS], captures “fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries” according to a 2010 HHS-funded study. Nevertheless, some alarming metrics ought to give you pause when you offer these assurances to millions of viewers; Flu vaccines account for nearly ¼ of payouts for injuries by the Vaccine Injury Compensation Fund (VICA). The Vaccine Court has paid out nearly $1 billion for injuries and deaths caused by flu shots.
GSK’s vaccine, Flulaval lists, on its manufacturing inserts, over 45 chronic diseases and adverse reactions that FDA believes may be linked to the vaccine. These include a long menu of immune system, allergic, musculoskeletal, psychiatric, respiratory, skin, vascular, and neurological disease including seizure, paralysis, and syncope.
Australian data link the influenza vaccine during the 2009 – 2010 flu season to a 1-in-110 risk in children of having febrile convulsions. The pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccine in Europe was associated with a 1-in-55,000 risk of developing narcolepsy. CDC acknowledges that the Pandemrix flu vaccine is associated with an “increased risk of narcolepsy”.
A 2015 meta-analysis published in the journal Vaccine has acknowledged “a small but statistically significant association between influenza vaccines, particularly the pandemic ones, and Guillen-Barre Syndrome (GBS)”.
A 2004 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association, JAMA, noted that GBS was “the most frequent neurological condition reported after influenza vaccination to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS)”.
The 2010 Cochrane meta-analysis chided that the post-mortality studies found that a statistically significant association between the influenza vaccine and GBS “demonstrate the danger of commencing a large vaccination campaign without adequate harms assessment.”
… the flu shot increases the risks from coronavirus by 36%.
CNN assertion: On March 5, 2020, you and Anderson Cooper did a “Town Hall” segment, “ Corona Facts and Fears ”, in which you fervently urged listeners to get the flu shot as the best way to keep healthy during the coronavirus pandemic. According to Anderson, “If you are concerned about coronavirus, you should get a flu shot”.
Fact: However, the only study we have been able to find assessing flu shots and coronavirus is a January 2020 US Pentagon study that found that the flu shot INCREASES the risks from coronavirus by 36%. “Receiving influenza vaccination may increase the risk of other respiratory viruses, a phenomenon known as “virus interference…’vaccine derived’ virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus…”
Many studies suggest the flu vaccine increases vulnerability to both flu infections and the remaining 85% -93% of non-flu respiratory infections.
CNN assertion: Sanjay, I’ve watched your video assuring the public that getting the flu shot cannot increase one’s chances of getting the flu.
Fact: While that assertion has some meager support from a very small number of studies, the overwhelming weight of published science suggests that getting an annual flu shot can actually increase your risk of both flu and flu-like illnesses.
Only about 7 percent to 15 percent of what are called “influenza-like illnesses” are actually caused by influenza viruses. Many studies suggest the flu vaccine increases vulnerability to both flu infections and the remaining 85% -93% of non-flu respiratory infections.
A 2011 study of healthy Australian children published in the Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal found that seasonal flu shots increase the risk of flu by 73% and doubled the risk of non-flu respiratory infections.
Similarly, another 2012 randomized controlled trial published in Clinical Infectious Diseases found that influenza-vaccinated children had no significantly lessened risk from influenza and also a higher risk of infection from non-influenza viruses.
Furthermore, the flu vaccine depletes capacity to fight off future flu infections. In April 2010, a study (by Skowronek, et al) published in the journal PLoS Medicine reported the “unexpected” finding from four epidemiologic studies in Canada that receipt of the influenza vaccine for the 2008 – 2009 season, while apparently effective in reducing the risk of illness due to the seasonal flu, was associated with an increased risk of illness due to the pandemic influenza A (H1N1) “swine flu” virus during the spring and summer of 2009. The scientists suggested that this finding could be due to the difference in the way the vaccine affects the immune system compared with natural infection.
Under this hypothesis, repeated vaccination “effectively blocks the more robust, complex, and cross-protective immunity afforded by prior infection.”
When unvaccinated people are infected with the seasonal influenza virus, they often develop a robust cell-mediated immunity that not only protects against that strain of the virus but is also cross-protective against other strains.
People who’ve annually received the influenza vaccine, on the other hand, “may have lost multiple opportunities for infection-induced cross-immunity.”This is because the vaccine is designed to stimulate a strong antibody response, or humoral immunity, but does not confer the same kind of robust cell-mediated immunity as natural infection.
NIH researchers in their 2005 study also acknowledged the superior effectiveness of naturally acquired immunity at reducing mortality, pointing out that senior citizens who contracted the H3N2 influenza pandemic infection demonstrated a robust immunity in subsequent flu seasons when compared to vaccinated individuals. The sharp decline in influenza-related deaths among people aged 65 to 74 years in the years immediately after the 1968 flu pandemic was most likely due to the acquisition of natural immunity to these viruses (from natural infections).
Another study published in 2011 in the Journal of Virology confirmed that annual influenza vaccination indeed hampers the development of a robust cell-mediated immunity. Annual vaccination for influenza, the authors concluded, “may render young children who have not previously been infected with an influenza virus more susceptible to infection with a pandemic influenza virus of a novel subtype.”
A 2018 CDC study found there was an increase of acute respiratory infections caused by non-influenza respiratory pathogens following influenza vaccination compared to unvaccinated children during the same period. The authors recommended that potential mechanisms for this association warrant further investigation.
While most studies have looked at only one or two flu seasons, a CDC-funded study published in September 2014 in Clinical Infectious Diseases considered the long-term effects of repeated annual vaccination by looking at five years of vaccination data.
The CDC researchers found that the more that people had been vaccinated in prior years, the less effective the vaccine are at preventing the most recent season’s dominant H3N2 virus.
As they put it, “vaccine-induced protection was greatest for individuals not vaccinated during the prior 5 years.”
Essentially, the immune system remembers the original infection and puts out a rapid defense against it, at the expense of developing a new but more appropriate response specifically to the currently infecting strain.
The CDC scientists warned that their data “raises relevant questions about the potential interference of repeated annual influenza vaccination and possible residual protection from previous season vaccination”; the authors called for further studies.
CNN assertion: One final observation about a different vaccine; In CNN’s regular promotion of measles vaccines, CNN and Sanjay frequently claim that natural measles mortalities are 1-2 in 1000. Those estimates seem calculated to frighten people into taking a measles shot and to drive MMR mandates.
Fact: CDC’s 1963 mortality and morbidity data show that prior to the introduction of the measles vaccine, improvements in nutrition and hygeine had already driven US measles mortality in U.S. to 400 per year, a population ratio of 1/500,000 and a death-case ratio of 1 in 10,000—about the same risk of dying from a lightning strike. Most of those mortalities were among malnourished children, many of whom suffered from intellectual disabilities. The best evidence suggests that measles mortalities would have continued to drop with the introduction of food stamps, W.I.C, and other childhood nutritional programs passed during the War on Poverty after 1964 to relieve hunger in impoverished communities.
Conclusion
In their 2010 meta-analysis, the Cochrane researchers accused the CDC of deliberately misrepresenting the science in order to support their universal influenza vaccination recommendation. Nevertheless, CNN continually broadcasts CDC pronouncements as gospel and, ironically, ridicules those of us who actually read the science as “purveyors of ‘vaccine misinformation’”.
Multiple comprehensive federal investigations and whistleblower declarations have documented the corrupt relationship between the CDC’s Vaccine Branch and the four vaccine makers: Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi, and GSK. These include a 2000 report by the US Congress Government Oversight Committee , a 2009 report by the Federal HHS Inspector General, a 2014 letter by David Wright, Director of HHS Office of Research Integrity, and a 2011 letter to Carmen S. Villar, chief of staff for Tom Frieden, from an organization of CDC scientists calling itself “SPIDER”.
In 2014, CDC’s senior vaccine safety scientist, Dr. William Thompson, a 17-year CDC veteran, who continues to work for CDC, confessed in a series of depositions, and public and private statements, that his CDC bosses in CDC’s Immunization Branch had systematically ordered him and other researchers to destroy data and falsify study outcomes to hide CDC research linking vaccines to the exploding epidemic of childhood chronic diseases including autism. Doesn’t the abundant evidence of corruption at the Federal health agencies amplify CNN’s obligation to treat government pronouncements with skepticism?
[The CDC] stressed that it was especially important to inspire “concern, anxiety, and worry” among young, healthy adults who don’t regard the flu with sufficient dread.
At a 2004 workshop for the Institute of Medicine, CDC unveiled a blueprint for the agency’s annual campaigns of fear and deception in a PowerPoint entitled “‘Recipe’ for Fostering Public Interest and High Vaccine Demand”. CDC’s in-house P.R. flack Glen Nowak explained that it was necessary to use fear marketing to sell vaccines. CDC’s campaign called for encouraging television medical experts (like Sanjay and Elizabeth Cohen) to “state concern and alarm” about “and predict dire outcomes” from the flu season. To inspire the necessary terror, the CDC planned to encourage its tame journalists to describe each season as “very severe”, “more severe than last or past years”, and “deadly”. CDC’s press flacks stressed that it was especially important to inspire “concern, anxiety, and worry” among young, healthy adults who don’t regard the flu with sufficient dread.
As the CDC bluntly stated it, “Health literacy is a growing problem”. In other words, the CDC considers it to be a problem that people are increasingly doing their own research and becoming more adept at educating themselves about health-related issues; Why? Because people who do their own research, read the science, and make informed choices rather than blindly following the CDC’s recommendations are less likely to get the flu shot.
“Drug companies”, Dr. Doshi observes, “have long known that to sell some products, you would have to first sell people on the disease.” Only, in the case of the influenza vaccine, Doshi adds, “the salesmen are public health officials”. These public health officials have, in turn, transformed trusted journalists and television doctors into Pharma marketing reps.
CNN likes to portray CDC’s annual flu shot campaigns as an important public health ritual. The peer-reviewed science exposes CDC’s campaigns as a mercantile propaganda project that is costly and may be injuring public health. CNN can fault CDC officials as the source of its “vaccine misinformation”. But this is a weak gesture. “People in power lie”, my father once told me. The function of journalism is to apply scrutiny and skepticism to the pronouncements of government officials and powerful corporations.
Finally, Sanjay, you and Anderson Cooper often comment with dismay on the monumental tragedy, for our democracy, of having a president who habitually lies. But presidents come and go; the more enduring tragedy, arguably, is that we cannot trust our news media to tell us the truth about vital health issues when advertising dollars are at stake. You scratch your head and wonder how all those Trump supporters don’t share your indignation at President Trump’s mendacity. One answer is that they are disheartened by once-trusted media outlets who have also set the precedent of routinely lying and violating the public trust, wounding in the process our democracy, public faith in critical institutions, and the health of our children.
Sincerely,
Robert F. Kennedy Jr
President, Children’s Health Defense
P.S. Just as a reminder, here is a 60 Minutes program from over 30 years ago. This is what journalism looked like before Pharma purchased the media.
•••• About Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. – His reputation as a resolute defender of the environment stems from a litany of successful legal actions. Mr. Kennedy was named one of Time magazine’s “Heroes for the Planet” for his success helping Riverkeeper lead the fight to restore the Hudson River. The group’s achievement helped spawn 300 Waterkeeper organizations across the globe. Mr. Kennedy serves as Senior Attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council, Chief Prosecuting Attorney for the Hudson Riverkeeper and President of Waterkeeper Alliance. He is also a Clinical Professor and Supervising Attorney at Pace University School of Law’s Environmental Litigation Clinic and is of counsel to Morgan & Morgan, a nationwide personal injury practice. He is co-host of Ring of Fire on Air America Radio. Earlier in his career he served as Assistant District Attorney in New York City. He has worked on environmental issues across the Americas and has assisted several indigenous tribes in Latin America and Canada in successfully negotiating treaties protecting traditional homelands. He is credited with leading the fight to protect New York City’s water supply. The New York City watershed agreement, which he negotiated on behalf of environmentalists and New York City watershed consumers, is regarded as an international model in stakeholder consensus negotiations and sustainable development. Mr. Kennedy is also a devout proponent for vaccine rights, the right to chose, informed consent, and the publication and public awareness of information needed by parents to make informed decisions for their much more vulnerable children. A large portion of his related works can be found on the Children’s Health Defense website •••• Read more Children’s Health Defense articles by RFK, JR. here •••• This article (Flu Misinformation and Coronavirus Fears: My Letter to Dr. Sanjay Gupta) originated on Children’s Health Defense and is re-published on this TLB website by ‘contribution’ with attribution to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. •••• TLB Editors Note: This is World Mercury Project on steroids! TLB highly recommends you click on the image below, visit this great website, and do whatever you can to help see this vital forum succeed … for the sake of our children !!! Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission. •••• •••• Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-04-18--Globalists using COVID-19 to usher in UN Agenda 2030 ‘Brave New World’ ten years ahead of schedule [

Globalists using COVID-19 to usher in UN Agenda 2030 ‘Brave New World’ ten years ahead of schedule [VIDEO]

The threat of killing capitalism and free enterprise is very real and most definitely existential to America as we have known it for over 200 years .
⁃ TN Editor I would again note that control over political structures is incidental to control over all economic functions .
When Technocracy prevails , elected politicians of all stripes will be summarily dismissed and engineers and scientists will run the world directly .
For citizens , this is the essence of scientific dictatorship : there is no need for representative government because systems will be run autonomously via algorithm .
France , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ under Philippe Pétain , experienced an administrative dictatorship known as the “ French State ” , has already experienced a political takeover by senior civil servants over the past three decades .
We then spoke of ENArchie .
( ER : L ’ ENA is the Ecole National d ’ Administration , the institution which generally produces the next generation of top administrators , presidents , etc .
‘ ENArchie ’ is clearly a joke , a play on the word ‘ anarchy ’ . )
Identically and without her being aware of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ knowledge of the administration that the accumulation of local and national mandates conferred on them .
From now on , elected officials are less well informed than senior civil servants and have all the trouble in the world controlling them .
Such was precisely the problem with Brexit , where Whitehall civil servants , who last for decades as the political class comes and goes , had been opposing and obstructing it every bit as much as most of the parliament .
In a recent piece , Thierry Meyssan made the same point @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( see Putchists Lie in the Shadow of the Coronavirus ) : It ’ s time for all true patriots to take a stand , or risk being led blindly into a new dark age .
When Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio Cortez rewrote the United Nations ’ Sustainable Development Goals and rebranded them as the Green New Deal , many conservatives were heard laughing out loud .
AOC couldn ’ t be serious , could she ?
But who ’ s laughing now ?
AOC has gotten most everything she wanted in the Green @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been all but grounded , with long waits at airports a distant memory .
• Automobile traffic on once-bustling highways has been reduced to a trickle .
• Most Americans have either been told to work from home , or not work at all .
They receive government paychecks to sit home and do nothing .
AOC called it the “ universal basic income.
” It ’ s here .
It ’ s time for President Trump to end this nightmarish experiment .
We need clarity and strong leadership .
Stop the back-slapping @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the content consists of congratulating himself and the governors for their wonderful handling of this crisis .
Let ’ s be honest , most have ignored the Constitution and overstepped their authority .
We need a firm date for when these lockdowns will end and our leaders need to stick to that date , not just throw a date out there , only to later extend it .
We want all of our country back .
Not in stages , not in phases .
The president ’ s advisers , Drs .
Fauci @ @ @ @ @ @ @ frauds and must no longer be allowed to dictate policy .
They convinced the president to make bad decisions based on faulty science and speculative computer models stocked with false assumptions .
They are up to their necks in conflicts of interest , mostly having to do with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and its many global partners pushing mandatory vaccines and a global ID system that can be used for tracking individual Americans .
For any politician to tell any small business that they are “ non-essential ” based on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tantamount to the central committee of the USSR telling kulaks to get off their land and go work in a factory .
Under Stalin , the Soviet state couldn ’ t control kulaks working on the land , so they expropriated it .
Took it .
Is that the Gates-Fauci strategy for America ’ s small business owners ?
Force them out and make them go work for Amazon , Walmart or some other mega-corporation where they can be more closely monitored ?
Sorry , but this isn ’ t the Soviet Union @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t have the authority under the U.S. Constitution to deprive any American of their right to earn an honest living .
Virus or no virus .
Left to its own devices , the state will always gravitate toward the accumulation of power .
Once the state has claimed the right to exercise power over a certain area of your life , it rarely gives it back .
Governors have claimed the power to tell us when we can go to church , where we can and can ’ t work .
So @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that .
But there ’ s also an undertone of uneasiness that is starting to boil over , as evidenced by the growing number of protests , first in Michigan and soon to follow in other states .
The arbitrary exercise of raw state power is breathtakingly evident everywhere in the current situation , yet so few are able to discern it .
Why , for instance , is it considered non-essential to shop for seeds , flowers , plants and shrubbery in Michigan while across the line in Ohio such purchases are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ go to a liquor store , pot dispensary , or a crowded Walmart but not to church or a gun store ?
These are decisions the government has no constitutional grounds to make for American citizens .
If politicians want to infringe upon these basic rights , then they should stop being cowards and declare martial law , thereby formally suspending the U.S. Constitution .
You don ’ t get to have your cake and eat it , too , snatching civil liberties while claiming the Constitution is still in place .
Some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ backgrounds of the “ experts ” our politicians relied on in ordering the lockdowns to begin with .
COVID-19 is a contagious virus that should be taken seriously .
But let ’ s not forget that at least 98 percent of those who catch COVID-19 make a full recovery .
It ’ s time that we all come to grips with the pertinent question : Are we willing to sacrifice our liberties , our way of life , on the altar of a health crisis that carries a 2 percent risk of death @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to speak out are estimating that the death rate will come in at less than 1 % . )
It ’ s safe to say that Drs .
Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx , the two infectious-disease experts heading up President Trump ’ s Coronavirus task force , are not going to change their advice , even though the original data they relied on in recommending these lockdowns turned out to be bogus .
There have been no hundreds of thousands of dead bodies , and the doomsday predictions of “ overwhelmed hospitals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have long track records of working with Bill Gates and his eugenicist vision for the world .
Fauci sits on the Leadership Council for the Global Vaccine Action Plan , a project of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation that works in concert with the United Nations .
[ See Gates ’ s press release on that project which documents Fauci ’ s role ] .
The United Nations Agenda 2030 , adopted in 2015 and fiercely promoted and funded by the Gates Foundation , consists of 17 Sustainable Development Goals [ aka @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the year 2030 .
• Goal number 3 , “ good health and wellbeing , ” begins with the U.N. ’ s demand that you “ vaccinate your family.
” Goal 3.8 states : “ Achieve universal health coverage , including financial risk protection , access to quality essential healthcare services and access to safe , effective , quality and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all.
” [ Emphasis added ] • Goal number 16.9 says “ By 2030 , provide legal identity for all , including birth registration.
” The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ repeated endlessly in its documents , is that this agenda will “ leave no one behind.
” How does the UN propose to leave no one behind unless the ultimate goal is to make these “ life-saving vaccines ” mandatory for all ?
We must also ask why Gates ’ s globalist agenda of forced vaccines and sterilization never gets exposed in the mainstream media ?
Could it be that the media establishment agrees with Gates ’ agenda and wants to hide it from the American people ?
Gates has poured billions into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ projects have left thousands of women sterile in Kenya and India , and his polio vaccines have caused paralysis in Afghanistan , Congo and the Philippines .
[ For more on Gates ’ s horrific track record on vaccines , leaving a trail of death and serious injury , read Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ’ s scathing report , published by Children ’ s Health Defense on April 9 , 2020 under the title Gates ’ Globalist Vaccine Agenda : A Win-Win for Pharma and Mandatory Vaccination . ]
Gates is the largest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a U.N. agency that , as President Trump says , is extremely “ China-centric ” and covers for China ’ s communist dictators at every turn .
China is always the model for success in the eyes of WHO , never the villain that needs to be dealt with , like when it deliberately gave out false information about the coronavirus .
Bill Gates ’ father , William Gates Sr. , is co-chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and a former board member for Planned Parenthood .
Fauci and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as the America-hating social engineering billionaire George Soros [ see photo below from 2001 ] .
There ’ s no escaping the fact that Bill Gates is a globalist .
He ’ s also a pathological eugenicist deeply invested in global population control , one of the longstanding goals of the United Nations .
If it ’ s reasonable to believe that neither of these two doctors , Fauci and Birx , is going to break ties with Gates and change their colors just because they are heading up a White House task @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump : Why are you listening to them ?
Why are these deeply conflicted advisers driving policy-making decisions – from the White House to the governor ’ s mansions and city halls ?
Such decisions , if allowed to continue , are placing our nation on a fast track to a new dark age .
And not just an economic-political dark age .
When we look at the rapidly changing social order , the light is also growing dim .
New rules are being fashioned for us as we speak .
Changes are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for groceries , how we pay for products [ cashless ? ]
, even how we greet our fellow man [ no handshaking ! ]
.
If you don ’ t obey these rules , you will be publicly shamed and blamed as exhibiting anti-social behaviors detrimental to the common good .
The way we “ do life ” may never return to normal if President Trump doesn ’ t intervene and take back the reins from these two doctors aligned with the vision of the United Nations , Bill Gates and a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Foundation and the World Economic Forum .
We ’ ve already reported on the WEF ’ s Event 201 conference in October last year , where the CDC , WHO , CIA , Johns Hopkins University , NBC and other sponsors convened to map out their global response to a coronavirus pandemic – two months before anyone had heard about a coronavirus outbreak .
Back in 2010 , the Rockefeller Foundation put out a 54-page white paper titled “ Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development.
” In this paper , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ based on a flu-like virus that attacks the human respiratory system .
On page 18 of that document , it describes a hypothetical scenario dubbed “ lockstep ” : In the U.S. , “ containment was a challenge , ” the Rockefeller paper continues , because the U.S. didn ’ t follow the lead of China in implementing mandatory lockdowns .
Wherever you see the fingerprints of the Rockefeller Foundation , the Gates family is not far away , working as a “ partner ” or co-funder .
They share the same eugenicist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are tied directly into that corrupt crowd and Trump needs to cut them loose before they ’ ve ramrodded their rotten agenda down our collective throats .
Michael Matt , executive editor of Remnant TV , exposed this cabal and connected the dots as well as anyone , and I strongly recommend his podcast , “ Trumping the Gates of Hell.
” Matt rightly discerns that what ’ s going on is bigger than partisan politics , Democrat vs. Republican .
“ This involves international intrigue , the WHO , George Soros , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Vatican ’ s globalist Pope Francis , ” he says .
“ But how ?
Why ?
What ’ s the endgame ?
” In chilling detail , he unpacks the endgame , which has virtually nothing to do with keeping you alive and healthy and everything to do with replacing American power in the world with something more centralized , more controlling of the masses .
We are staring at the dawning of a new “ Technocratic ” era that has been sitting on the U.N. ’ s shelf for several @ @ @ @ @ @ @ event so it can be implemented .
Part of the Gates ’ plan for a new technocratic utopian system is the tagging and tracking of every human being using a digital ID system .
This global ID system is being designed as we speak by the New York City-based ID2020 Alliance .
Gates ’ s Microsoft Corp. became one of the founding partners in January 2018 along with Gavi Vaccine Alliance , another Gates-funded project .
Funding also comes from longtime Gates collaborator the Rockefeller Foundation .
In order to bring in this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comrades have long known that they need to take down America , knock it off its perch as the world ’ s most important superpower and “ level the playing field ” among nations .
( ER : It is also clear that western European nations are in the same economic line of fire for take down . )
I argued the same line of reasoning in my article from two weeks ago , “ Sanitized Dictatorship : How COVID19 is being used to transform the world and destroy the Trump revolution.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from Michael Matt , who takes 43 minutes to document and explain the web of deceit that is being woven .
Matt doesn ’ t use the word “ technocratic ” but that ’ s exactly what he is describing – a new global order in which capitalism and free enterprise are replaced by a hybrid form of socialism and crony capitalism , like that which enslaves the population in China .
In a technocracy , corrupt scientists and data-mining bureaucrats call the shots and elected politicians do their bidding .
The people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coincidence that Gates was also the major money behind the Common Core education standards , which are focused on data mining of students through incessant testing and surveying of students to create what amounts to a dossier on each individual student ’ s attitudes , values and beliefs .
This is private information that education bureaucrats have no business getting their hands on , anymore than healthcare bureaucrats should be shopping out your private health data .
As Bill Gates ’ s wife , Melinda , said in 2017 , captured in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ love data .
The numbers matter to us… ” Ah yes , data .
They love data because it can be easily weaponized against certain sectors of society .
In China , the technocrat model for the world , the government uses data to operate a system of social scoring .
Those with low social scores , such as Christians , are passed over for the prime jobs and forced to meet in underground home churches .
Yes , we ’ ve seen how the data miners work .
By blowing up the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that forecasted wildly inaccurate numbers of up to 1 million dead Americans , they were able to get the attention of the American public , get us to cooperate with the advancement of our own enslavement .
Gates said , in an interview with Fox News ’ Chris Wallace : Canadian PM Justin Trudeau came out this week with a statement that sounded eerily similar .
“ We will not be coming back to our former normal situation ; we can ’ t do that until we have developed a vaccine , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” Trudeau told reporters last Thursday .
Zeke Emanuel , the former Obama aide who now advises Joe Biden , told MSNBC : “ Realistically , COVID-19 will be here for the next 18 months or more .
We will not be able to return to normalcy until we find a vaccine or effective medications.
” Who Will Be Our Savior ?
So you can see that the left , and some dummies on the right , are all on the same page with Bill Gates .
The media is cooperating by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to report that 98 percent of Americans who contract coronavirus are making a full recovery .
And the drugs needed to treat it are already here ; they ’ re cheap and widely available .
We should be focusing on building up our immune systems , as advocated by Dr. Shiva in an article I posted here .
We don ’ t need Gates ’ s forced vaccines .
It ’ s time to let these globalists know it ’ s game over .
Their cover ’ s been blown .
The only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the White House hotline and tell President Trump we want our nation opened back up , now .
An even better option is to follow the lead of Michigan .
The great patriots of Michigan have taken to the streets in peaceful protest .
They turned out en masse at the State Capitol in Lansing today [ Wednesday April 15 ] to demand socialist Gov .
Getchen Whitmer reopen the economy .
We don ’ t want another government “ stimulus ” check .
We want to go back to work .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Which is the same as listening to the psychopath Gates .
Fauci has been repeating the Bill Gates lie that the only way out of this is to wait for a vaccine .
That way , he gets to make Gates and the globalists our saviors .
They will make our president look like a bumbling buffoon , who created a mess that only the globalists , riding in on their white horses , can fix .
In the end , only Jesus Christ can save us .
We know that .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , for a time , and that will be a period of hell on earth .
Pray for more time .
I think we need it .
Otherwise , we submit to the globalists , who will lead us into a new dark age .
Whereas 9/11 required us to submit to pat downs of our physical person at airports , court houses and other public places , the COVID19 pandemic will end with every American submitting to a scan of their digital healthcare history .
Unless the people reject this system we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ social distancing ” and fractured unity .
• An age of agenda-driven shaming and blaming • An age of suspicion and show your papers • An age of lock downs , tracking , tagging and monitoring .
Enough is enough .
Featured meme : Bill Gates , left , NIH director Dr. Francis Collins and NIAID director Dr. Anthony Fauci at a 2017 Gates Foundation global health workshop on topics that included vaccine research .
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com

The threat of killing capitalism and free enterprise is very real and most definitely existential to America as we have known it for over 200 years. ⁃ TN Editor
I would again note that control over political structures is incidental to control over all economic functions . When Technocracy prevails, elected politicians of all stripes will be summarily dismissed and engineers and scientists will run the world directly. For citizens, this is the essence of scientific dictatorship: there is no need for representative government because systems will be run autonomously via algorithm .
France , which during the Second World War, under Philippe Pétain, experienced an administrative dictatorship known as the “French State”, has already experienced a political takeover by senior civil servants over the past three decades. We then spoke of ENArchie. (ER: L’ENA is the Ecole National d’Administration, the institution which generally produces the next generation of top administrators, presidents, etc. ‘ENArchie’ is clearly a joke, a play on the word ‘anarchy’.) Identically and without her being aware of it, she deprived politicians of the knowledge of the administration that the accumulation of local and national mandates conferred on them. From now on, elected officials are less well informed than senior civil servants and have all the trouble in the world controlling them.
Such was precisely the problem with Brexit , where Whitehall civil servants, who last for decades as the political class comes and goes, had been opposing and obstructing it every bit as much as most of the parliament. In a recent piece, Thierry Meyssan made the same point about France having turned technocratic in nature (see Putchists Lie in the Shadow of the Coronavirus ) :
It’s time for all true patriots to take a stand, or risk being led blindly into a new dark age.
LEO HOHMANN
When Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio Cortez rewrote the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals and rebranded them as the Green New Deal, many conservatives were heard laughing out loud.
AOC couldn’t be serious, could she? But who’s laughing now? AOC has gotten most everything she wanted in the Green New Deal.
Air traffic has been all but grounded, with long waits at airports a distant memory.
Automobile traffic on once-bustling highways has been reduced to a trickle.
Most Americans have either been told to work from home, or not work at all. They receive government paychecks to sit home and do nothing. AOC called it the “universal basic income.” It’s here.
It’s time for President Trump to end this nightmarish experiment.
We need clarity and strong leadership.
Stop the back-slapping daily press briefings where 90 percent of the content consists of congratulating himself and the governors for their wonderful handling of this crisis.
Let’s be honest, most have ignored the Constitution and overstepped their authority.
We need a firm date for when these lockdowns will end and our leaders need to stick to that date, not just throw a date out there, only to later extend it.
We want all of our country back. Not in stages, not in phases.
The president’s advisers, Drs. Fauci and Birx, have been exposed as frauds and must no longer be allowed to dictate policy.
They convinced the president to make bad decisions based on faulty science and speculative computer models stocked with false assumptions. They are up to their necks in conflicts of interest, mostly having to do with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and its many global partners pushing mandatory vaccines and a global ID system that can be used for tracking individual Americans.
For any politician to tell any small business that they are “non-essential” based on the advice of these two Gates-funded stooges is tantamount to the central committee of the USSR telling kulaks to get off their land and go work in a factory.
Under Stalin, the Soviet state couldn’t control kulaks working on the land, so they expropriated it. Took it. Is that the Gates-Fauci strategy for America’s small business owners? Force them out and make them go work for Amazon, Walmart or some other mega-corporation where they can be more closely monitored?
Sorry, but this isn’t the Soviet Union or Communist China.
The state doesn’t have the authority under the U.S. Constitution to deprive any American of their right to earn an honest living. Virus or no virus.
Left to its own devices, the state will always gravitate toward the accumulation of power. Once the state has claimed the right to exercise power over a certain area of your life, it rarely gives it back.
Governors have claimed the power to tell us when we can go to church, where we can and can’t work. So far, most Americans seem good with that. But there’s also an undertone of uneasiness that is starting to boil over, as evidenced by the growing number of protests, first in Michigan and soon to follow in other states.
The arbitrary exercise of raw state power is breathtakingly evident everywhere in the current situation, yet so few are able to discern it.
Why, for instance, is it considered non-essential to shop for seeds, flowers, plants and shrubbery in Michigan while across the line in Ohio such purchases are legal?
Why are you allowed to go to a liquor store, pot dispensary, or a crowded Walmart but not to church or a gun store?
These are decisions the government has no constitutional grounds to make for American citizens.
If politicians want to infringe upon these basic rights, then they should stop being cowards and declare martial law, thereby formally suspending the U.S. Constitution.
You don’t get to have your cake and eat it, too, snatching civil liberties while claiming the Constitution is still in place.
Who is Anthony Fauci?
Some clarity is also in order on the backgrounds of the “experts” our politicians relied on in ordering the lockdowns to begin with.
COVID-19 is a contagious virus that should be taken seriously.
But let’s not forget that at least 98 percent of those who catch COVID-19 make a full recovery. It’s time that we all come to grips with the pertinent question: Are we willing to sacrifice our liberties, our way of life, on the altar of a health crisis that carries a 2 percent risk of death? (ER: some experts willing to speak out are estimating that the death rate will come in at less than 1%.)
It’s safe to say that Drs. Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx, the two infectious-disease experts heading up President Trump’s Coronavirus task force, are not going to change their advice, even though the original data they relied on in recommending these lockdowns turned out to be bogus.
There have been no hundreds of thousands of dead bodies, and the doomsday predictions of “overwhelmed hospitals” never materialized.
Fauci and Birx have long track records of working with Bill Gates and his eugenicist vision for the world.
Fauci sits on the Leadership Council for the Global Vaccine Action Plan, a project of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation that works in concert with the United Nations. [See Gates’s press release on that project which documents Fauci’s role].
The United Nations Agenda 2030, adopted in 2015 and fiercely promoted and funded by the Gates Foundation, consists of 17 Sustainable Development Goals [aka Green New Deal] to be achieved by the year 2030.
Goal number 3, “good health and wellbeing ,” begins with the U.N.’s demand that you “vaccinate your family.” Goal 3.8 states: “Achieve universal health coverage, including financial risk protection, access to quality essential healthcare services and access to safe, effective, quality and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all .” [Emphasis added]
,” Goal 3.8 states: “Achieve universal health coverage, including financial risk protection, access to quality essential healthcare services and access to safe, effective, quality and affordable essential medicines .” [Emphasis added] Goal number 16.9 says “By 2030, provide legal identity for all, including birth registration.”
The UN’s 2030 Agenda motto, repeated endlessly in its documents, is that this agenda will “leave no one behind.”
How does the UN propose to leave no one behind unless the ultimate goal is to make these “life-saving vaccines” mandatory for all?
We must also ask why Gates’s globalist agenda of forced vaccines and sterilization never gets exposed in the mainstream media? Could it be that the media establishment agrees with Gates’ agenda and wants to hide it from the American people?
Gates has poured billions into furthering access to abortion. His vaccine projects have left thousands of women sterile in Kenya and India, and his polio vaccines have caused paralysis in Afghanistan, Congo and the Philippines. [For more on Gates’s horrific track record on vaccines, leaving a trail of death and serious injury, read Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s scathing report, published by Children’s Health Defense on April 9, 2020 under the title Gates’ Globalist Vaccine Agenda: A Win-Win for Pharma and Mandatory Vaccination.]
Kennedy Jr. writes:
Gates is the largest private donor to the World Health Organization, a U.N. agency that, as President Trump says, is extremely “China-centric” and covers for China’s communist dictators at every turn.
China is always the model for success in the eyes of WHO, never the villain that needs to be dealt with, like when it deliberately gave out false information about the coronavirus.
Bill Gates’ father, William Gates Sr., is co-chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and a former board member for Planned Parenthood. Fauci and the Gates clan move in the same circles as the America-hating social engineering billionaire George Soros [see photo below from 2001].
There’s no escaping the fact that Bill Gates is a globalist. He’s also a pathological eugenicist deeply invested in global population control, one of the longstanding goals of the United Nations.
If it’s reasonable to believe that neither of these two doctors, Fauci and Birx, is going to break ties with Gates and change their colors just because they are heading up a White House task force, then we must ask President Trump: Why are you listening to them?
A New Economic and Social Order
Why are these deeply conflicted advisers driving policy-making decisions – from the White House to the governor’s mansions and city halls?
Such decisions, if allowed to continue, are placing our nation on a fast track to a new dark age.
And not just an economic-political dark age.
When we look at the rapidly changing social order, the light is also growing dim.
New rules are being fashioned for us as we speak. Changes are coming for everything — how we shop for groceries, how we pay for products [cashless?], even how we greet our fellow man [no handshaking!].
If you don’t obey these rules, you will be publicly shamed and blamed as exhibiting anti-social behaviors detrimental to the common good.
The way we “do life” may never return to normal if President Trump doesn’t intervene and take back the reins from these two doctors aligned with the vision of the United Nations, Bill Gates and a host of creepy NGOs like the Rockefeller Foundation and the World Economic Forum.
We’ve already reported on the WEF’s Event 201 conference in October last year, where the CDC, WHO, CIA, Johns Hopkins University, NBC and other sponsors convened to map out their global response to a coronavirus pandemic – two months before anyone had heard about a coronavirus outbreak.
Back in 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation put out a 54-page white paper titled “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development.”
In this paper, the foundation gamed out a future pandemic based on a flu-like virus that attacks the human respiratory system.
On page 18 of that document, it describes a hypothetical scenario dubbed “lockstep”:
“In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain—originating from wild geese—was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.”
In the U.S., “containment was a challenge,” the Rockefeller paper continues, because the U.S. didn’t follow the lead of China in implementing mandatory lockdowns.
“The United States’ initial policy of ‘strongly discouraging’ citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better—China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.”
Wherever you see the fingerprints of the Rockefeller Foundation, the Gates family is not far away, working as a “partner” or co-funder. They share the same eugenicist agenda.
Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx are tied directly into that corrupt crowd and Trump needs to cut them loose before they’ve ramrodded their rotten agenda down our collective throats.
Michael Matt, executive editor of Remnant TV, exposed this cabal and connected the dots as well as anyone, and I strongly recommend his podcast, “Trumping the Gates of Hell.”
Matt rightly discerns that what’s going on is bigger than partisan politics, Democrat vs. Republican.
“This involves international intrigue, the WHO, George Soros, Bill Gates, the Trump phenomenon and the Vatican’s globalist Pope Francis,” he says. “But how? Why? What’s the endgame?”
In chilling detail, he unpacks the endgame, which has virtually nothing to do with keeping you alive and healthy and everything to do with replacing American power in the world with something more centralized, more controlling of the masses.
We are staring at the dawning of a new “Technocratic” era that has been sitting on the U.N.’s shelf for several decades, just waiting for a triggering event so it can be implemented.
Part of the Gates’ plan for a new technocratic utopian system is the tagging and tracking of every human being using a digital ID system.
This global ID system is being designed as we speak by the New York City-based ID2020 Alliance. Gates’s Microsoft Corp. became one of the founding partners in January 2018 along with Gavi Vaccine Alliance, another Gates-funded project. Funding also comes from longtime Gates collaborator the Rockefeller Foundation.
In order to bring in this system fully, Gates and his globalist comrades have long known that they need to take down America, knock it off its perch as the world’s most important superpower and “level the playing field” among nations. (ER: It is also clear that western European nations are in the same economic line of fire for take down.)
I argued the same line of reasoning in my article from two weeks ago, “Sanitized Dictatorship: How COVID19 is being used to transform the world and destroy the Trump revolution.”
Now I’ve got intellectual backup from Michael Matt, who takes 43 minutes to document and explain the web of deceit that is being woven. Matt doesn’t use the word “technocratic” but that’s exactly what he is describing – a new global order in which capitalism and free enterprise are replaced by a hybrid form of socialism and crony capitalism, like that which enslaves the population in China.
In a technocracy, corrupt scientists and data-mining bureaucrats call the shots and elected politicians do their bidding. The people be damned. It’s not coincidence that Gates was also the major money behind the Common Core education standards, which are focused on data mining of students through incessant testing and surveying of students to create what amounts to a dossier on each individual student’s attitudes, values and beliefs. This is private information that education bureaucrats have no business getting their hands on, anymore than healthcare bureaucrats should be shopping out your private health data.
As Bill Gates’s wife, Melinda, said in 2017, captured in the above video, “Bill and I love data. The numbers matter to us…”
Ah yes, data. They love data because it can be easily weaponized against certain sectors of society.
In China, the technocrat model for the world, the government uses data to operate a system of social scoring.
Those with low social scores, such as Christians, are passed over for the prime jobs and forced to meet in underground home churches.
Yes, we’ve seen how the data miners work.
By blowing up the COVID crisis, using unscientific computer models that forecasted wildly inaccurate numbers of up to 1 million dead Americans, they were able to get the attention of the American public, get us to cooperate with the advancement of our own enslavement.
Gates said, in an interview with Fox News’ Chris Wallace:
“It is fair to say things won’t go back to truly normal until we have a vaccine that we’ve gotten out to basically the entire world.”
Canadian PM Justin Trudeau came out this week with a statement that sounded eerily similar.
“We will not be coming back to our former normal situation; we can’t do that until we have developed a vaccine, and that could take 12 to 18 months,” Trudeau told reporters last Thursday.
Zeke Emanuel, the former Obama aide who now advises Joe Biden, told MSNBC: “Realistically, COVID-19 will be here for the next 18 months or more. We will not be able to return to normalcy until we find a vaccine or effective medications.”
Who Will Be Our Savior?
So you can see that the left, and some dummies on the right, are all on the same page with Bill Gates.
The media is cooperating by continuing to stoke fear. They fail to report that 98 percent of Americans who contract coronavirus are making a full recovery. And the drugs needed to treat it are already here; they’re cheap and widely available.
We should be focusing on building up our immune systems, as advocated by Dr. Shiva in an article I posted here. We don’t need Gates’s forced vaccines.
It’s time to let these globalists know it’s game over. Their cover’s been blown.
The only way to do that is to call the White House hotline and tell President Trump we want our nation opened back up, now.
Michigan patriots taking back their government
An even better option is to follow the lead of Michigan. The great patriots of Michigan have taken to the streets in peaceful protest. They turned out en masse at the State Capitol in Lansing today [Wednesday April 15] to demand socialist Gov. Getchen Whitmer reopen the economy.
We don’t want another government “stimulus” check. We want to go back to work.
The alternative is to keep listening to Fauci. Which is the same as listening to the psychopath Gates.
Fauci has been repeating the Bill Gates lie that the only way out of this is to wait for a vaccine.
That way, he gets to make Gates and the globalists our saviors. They will make our president look like a bumbling buffoon, who created a mess that only the globalists, riding in on their white horses, can fix.
In the end, only Jesus Christ can save us. We know that.
The globalists will eventually get their way, for a time, and that will be a period of hell on earth. Pray for more time. I think we need it.
Otherwise, we submit to the globalists, who will lead us into a new dark age.
Whereas 9/11 required us to submit to pat downs of our physical person at airports, court houses and other public places, the COVID19 pandemic will end with every American submitting to a scan of their digital healthcare history. Unless the people reject this system we are headed for…
An age of “social distancing” and fractured unity.
An age of agenda-driven shaming and blaming
An age of suspicion and show your papers
An age of lock downs, tracking, tagging and monitoring.
Enough is enough.
************
Featured meme: Bill Gates, left, NIH director Dr. Francis Collins and NIAID director Dr. Anthony Fauci at a 2017 Gates Foundation global health workshop on topics that included vaccine research.
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com