thelibertybeacon--2020-10-27--The missing COVID virus—answering critics’ objections

For months , I ’ ve been providing evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has not been proven to exist .
Several recent objections to my analysis have been brought forward .
I ’ m not interested in mentioning names or getting into disputes with people who might otherwise be doing important work .
One objection that ’ s been raised : a key CDC document [ 1 ] I quoted [ 2 ] , which openly admitted that the virus was “ not available , ” was not really published in July of this year .
It was reprinted or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ published in February , when presumably , the CDC might have had a problem obtaining isolated virus .
Really ?
The “ pandemic ” was already underway in February .
The CDC , one of the two most powerful public health agencies in the world , couldn ’ t get isolated virus then—couldn ’ t get it anywhere .
In other words , there was a declared pandemic without a proven virus .
That is a damning fact .
I don ’ t care whether it was February or July .
If the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , no one had it .
No one had it , because no one had isolated it .
Researchers simply assumed it existed .
Not only that , the CDC document [ 1 ] [ 2 ] in which the agency admitted the virus was “ not available ” was a long article describing how to perform the PCR test for the virus .
What virus ?
The one that wasn ’ t there ?
You put together a test procedure that will change the fate of humanity , but you don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supposed to detect .
This is permissible ?
This is excusable ?
Not unless science is fairy tales .
A few superficial critics of my work should also realize this CDC document is far from my only evidence showing the virus hasn ’ t been isolated .
They should read all my articles on the subject .
Another objection to my analysis : labs do , in fact , have isolated virus in the form of “ viral stocks.
” But what does that phrase mean ?
It means SOUP .
In dishes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have virus mixed with cells , mixed with chemicals and drugs and who knows what else .
If this is “ isolation , ” a rabbit is a spaceship .
Further , it is claimed , because some of those cells—monkey cells—die in the dish in the lab , this means the virus is there and is doing the killing .
Nonsense .
First of all , the cells are being starved of nutrients .
Second , they ’ re open to being poisoned by the drugs and chemicals in the soup .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ killing is unwarranted and absurd .
[ 3 ] [ 4 ] [ 5 ] The third objection to my analysis : researchers can assemble the PCR test without actually having the virus .
They can substitute “ synthetic RNA ” which is a close match to the virus .
I see .
And they know the synthetic RNA is a close match to the missing virus exactly how ?
Answer : they don ’ t know .
They assume .
They pretend .
[ 6 ] [ 7 ] [ 8 ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 11 ] This would be like saying : “ Ahem .
There is an unknown planet in our solar system .
We haven ’ t seen it , we don ’ t know where it is , we don ’ t know what it looks like , but we do know the moon is a very close version of the unknown planet .
Therefore , we can use everything we know about the moon to infer a precise description of the unknown planet.
” This kind of tap-dancing might win you a prize @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but it has nothing to do with science .
For those who want to further explore the core issue of the existence of the virus—e.g.
, medical professionals , who have large gaps and blind sports in their understanding—I STRONGLY suggest accessing the work of Dr. Andrew Kaufman [ 12 ] and Dr. Tom Cowan [ 13 ] .
I understand that some people who are very much opposed to the lockdowns and the economic destruction want to keep the argument along the channels of : the deceptive PCR test ; the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dangerous vaccine ; the ripping away of Constitutional and natural freedoms .
Anyone who has been reading my more than 200 articles about COVID [ 14 ] knows I ’ ve been tackling those issues since the beginning .
But the existence of the virus is not merely a distraction .
It ’ s at the starting gate of the whole effort to initiate new levels of enslavement for all humans .
It can ’ t be brushed aside .
It would be foolish of me to criticize people who are otherwise doing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the technocratic takeover of Earth , simply because they aren ’ t addressing the existence of the virus .
If a few of them want to criticize me , fine .
I ’ ve been around the block more times than I can count .
It ’ s not a problem .
I ’ d suggest , though , they do more than a dip a toe into the water of the stupendous virus-fraud .
And don ’ t try the tactic of accusing me of “ confusing people about the pandemic.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ measuring veracity .
It ’ s actually a low-level con .
When two sides disagree , proponents of one side assert the other side is sowing confusion .
Baloney .
The confusion , in this case , is inherent in the conventional view of virus-isolation and proof of discovery .
One disease one germ , a thousand diseases a thousand germs—this lock-step ironclad pharmaceutical propaganda of more than a century has caused monstrous harm .
It ’ s time to end the madness .
We don ’ t need unanimity on every issue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of good will and decency .
I ’ m glad to report that , with only a few exceptions , this is what I find .
Coda : Blithely accepting the existence of the virus puts people on a slippery slope .
From that point on , they may accept at least partial anti-human “ containment measures.
” Lockdowns under certain circumstances , some mask wearing , some distancing , some restrictions on the size and nature of gatherings , some isolation from loved ones , some tracing , some testing .
Before @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dealing from a position of weakness and compromise : “ I agree that a certain amount of destruction is necessary , but not as much destruction as Fauci wants… ” On moral , spiritual , strategic , political , economic , and scientific grounds , that ’ s disastrous .
Now , as a backgrounder , here is my article about Dr. Tom Cowan ’ s recent exploration of the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense : [ 5 ] Dr. Tom Cowan explores the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense @ @ @ @ @ @ @ used an arbitrary computer “ tinker-toy ” process to invent a description of the virus .
The virus that no one has proven exists .
This is the basic conclusion of Dr. Tom Cowan .
The CDC article [ 3 ] was discovered by Sally Fallon Morrell .
Her co-author , Dr. Cowan , fleshes out the fraud .
Cowan ’ s article is titled , “ Only Poisoned Monkey Cells ‘ Grew ’ the ‘ Virus ’ .
” [ 4 ] [ 5 ] Dr. Cowan : “ [ The CDC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2020 [ original publication , March 2020 ] .
The purpose of the article was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation , purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus , and to share this information with other scientists for their own research .
A thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.
” “ First , in the section titled ‘ Whole Genome Sequencing , ’ we find that rather than having isolated the virus and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , they found 37 base pairs from unpurified samples using PCR probes .
This means they actually looked at 37 out of the approximately 30,000 of the base pairs that are claimed to be the genome of the intact virus .
They then took these 37 segments and put them into a computer program , which filled in the rest of the base pairs.
” In other words , the sequencing of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was done by assumption and arbitrary inference .
If this is science , a penguin is a spaceship @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud .
Here is an equivalency : A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof , a hair from a tail , and a snippet of a horn .
They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn , and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn .
Of course , they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s hair , hooves and horn.
” “ The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by ‘ consensus , ’ sort of like a vote .
Again , different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary ‘ unicorn , ’ so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn.
” As I ’ ve been stating [ 10 ] , the “ discovery ” of the “ new virus ” was actually the foisting of a PRE-DETERMINED STORY @ @ @ @ @ @ @ believable about it .
But once the official pattern is laid down , others follow it dutifully .
Dr. Cowan uncovers more insanity in the CDC journal article .
Using the ASSUMED new virus , in an UN-ISOLATED STATE , the researchers try to prove it is harmful by injecting it on to several different types of cells in the lab : Cowan : “ The real blockbuster finding in this study comes later , a finding so shocking that I had to read it many times before I could believe what I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ passage intact : ” “ ’ Therefore , we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines , including human adenocarcinoma cells ( A549 ) , human liver cells ( HUH 7.0 ) , and human embryonic kidney cells ( HEK-293T ) .
In addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells [ monkey cells ] .
… Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of infection and examined 24h post-infection .
No CPE was observed in any of the cell lines except @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which grew to greater than 10 to the 7th power at 24 h post-infection .
In contrast , HUH 7.0 and 293T showed only modest viral replication , and A549 cells [ human cells ] were incompatible with SARS CoV-2 infection ’ .
” “ What does this language actually mean , and why is it the most shocking statement of all from the virology community ?
When virologists attempt to prove infection , they have three possible ‘ hosts ’ or models on which they can test… ” “ The third method @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — the method they most rely on — is inoculation of solutions they say contain the virus onto a variety of tissue cultures .
As I have pointed out many times , such inoculation has never been shown to kill ( lyse ) the tissue , unless the tissue is first starved and poisoned.
” “ The shocking thing about the above [ CDC journal ] quote is that using their own methods , the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT , I repeat NOT @ @ @ @ @ @ @ human tissue cultures they tested .
In plain English , this means they proved , on their terms , that this ‘ new coronavirus ’ is not infectious to human beings .
It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells , and only then when you add two potent drugs ( gentamicin and amphotericin ) , known to be toxic to kidneys , to the mix.
” “ My friends , read this again and again .
These virologists , published by the CDC , performed a clear proof , on their terms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is harmless to human beings .
That is the only possible conclusion , but , unfortunately , this result is not even mentioned in their conclusion .
They simply say they can provide virus stocks cultured only on monkey Vero cells , thanks for coming.
” So first…use a process of genetic sequencing that involves concocting , out of an arbitrary computer program… The existence and structure of the “ new virus ” … ( TLB ) published this original article from the blog of Jon Rappoport with our appreciation for his contribution @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jon Rappoport is the author of three explosive collections , THE MATRIX REVEALED , EXIT FROM THE MATRIX , and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX , Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California .
He maintains a consulting practice for private clients , the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power .
Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize , he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years , writing articles on politics , medicine , and health for CBS Healthwatch , LA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe .
Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics , health , logic , and creative power to audiences around the world .
You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here .

The missing COVID virus—answering critics’ objections
And… Dr. Tom Cowan explores the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense
John Rappoport
For months, I’ve been providing evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has not been proven to exist.
Several recent objections to my analysis have been brought forward.
I’m not interested in mentioning names or getting into disputes with people who might otherwise be doing important work.
One objection that’s been raised: a key CDC document [1] I quoted [2], which openly admitted that the virus was “not available,” was not really published in July of this year. It was reprinted or updated in July; it was originally published in February, when presumably, the CDC might have had a problem obtaining isolated virus.
Really? The “pandemic” was already underway in February. The CDC, one of the two most powerful public health agencies in the world, couldn’t get isolated virus then—couldn’t get it anywhere. In other words, there was a declared pandemic without a proven virus.
That is a damning fact. I don’t care whether it was February or July. If the CDC couldn’t get the virus, no one had it.
No one had it, because no one had isolated it. Researchers simply assumed it existed.
Not only that, the CDC document [1] [2] in which the agency admitted the virus was “not available” was a long article describing how to perform the PCR test for the virus. What virus? The one that wasn’t there?
You put together a test procedure that will change the fate of humanity, but you don’t have the item the procedure is supposed to detect. This is permissible? This is excusable? Not unless science is fairy tales.
A few superficial critics of my work should also realize this CDC document is far from my only evidence showing the virus hasn’t been isolated. They should read all my articles on the subject.
Another objection to my analysis: labs do, in fact, have isolated virus in the form of “viral stocks.”
But what does that phrase mean? It means SOUP. In dishes, in labs, researchers assume they have virus mixed with cells, mixed with chemicals and drugs and who knows what else. If this is “isolation,” a rabbit is a spaceship.
Further, it is claimed, because some of those cells—monkey cells—die in the dish in the lab, this means the virus is there and is doing the killing.
Nonsense. First of all, the cells are being starved of nutrients. Second, they’re open to being poisoned by the drugs and chemicals in the soup. The presumption of the virus doing the killing is unwarranted and absurd. [3] [4] [5]
The third objection to my analysis: researchers can assemble the PCR test without actually having the virus. They can substitute “synthetic RNA” which is a close match to the virus.
I see. And they know the synthetic RNA is a close match to the missing virus exactly how? Answer: they don’t know. They assume. They pretend. [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
This would be like saying: “Ahem. There is an unknown planet in our solar system. We haven’t seen it, we don’t know where it is, we don’t know what it looks like, but we do know the moon is a very close version of the unknown planet. Therefore, we can use everything we know about the moon to infer a precise description of the unknown planet.”
This kind of tap-dancing might win you a prize at a junior high school variety show, but it has nothing to do with science.
For those who want to further explore the core issue of the existence of the virus—e.g., medical professionals, who have large gaps and blind sports in their understanding—I STRONGLY suggest accessing the work of Dr. Andrew Kaufman [12] and Dr. Tom Cowan [13].
I understand that some people who are very much opposed to the lockdowns and the economic destruction want to keep the argument along the channels of: the deceptive PCR test; the false case and death numbers; the dangerous vaccine; the ripping away of Constitutional and natural freedoms.
Anyone who has been reading my more than 200 articles about COVID [14] knows I’ve been tackling those issues since the beginning. But the existence of the virus is not merely a distraction. It’s at the starting gate of the whole effort to initiate new levels of enslavement for all humans. It can’t be brushed aside.
It would be foolish of me to criticize people who are otherwise doing very important work to stem the tide of the technocratic takeover of Earth, simply because they aren’t addressing the existence of the virus.
If a few of them want to criticize me, fine. I’ve been around the block more times than I can count. It’s not a problem. I’d suggest, though, they do more than a dip a toe into the water of the stupendous virus-fraud.
And don’t try the tactic of accusing me of “confusing people about the pandemic.” That is not a standard for measuring veracity. It’s actually a low-level con. When two sides disagree, proponents of one side assert the other side is sowing confusion. Baloney. The confusion, in this case, is inherent in the conventional view of virus-isolation and proof of discovery.
One disease one germ, a thousand diseases a thousand germs—this lock-step ironclad pharmaceutical propaganda of more than a century has caused monstrous harm. It’s time to end the madness.
We don’t need unanimity on every issue. But we do need a measure of good will and decency. I’m glad to report that, with only a few exceptions, this is what I find.
Coda: Blithely accepting the existence of the virus puts people on a slippery slope. From that point on, they may accept at least partial anti-human “containment measures.” Lockdowns under certain circumstances, some mask wearing, some distancing, some restrictions on the size and nature of gatherings, some isolation from loved ones, some tracing, some testing. Before they know it, they’re dealing from a position of weakness and compromise: “I agree that a certain amount of destruction is necessary, but not as much destruction as Fauci wants…” On moral, spiritual, strategic, political, economic, and scientific grounds, that’s disastrous.
Now, as a backgrounder, here is my article about Dr. Tom Cowan’s recent exploration of the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense: [5]
Dr. Tom Cowan explores the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense
—Dr. Cowan analyzes yet another key document posted by the CDC, in their journal, Emerging Infectious Diseases: “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States”—
by Jon Rappoport
October 19, 2020
The hits keep coming. The CDC used an arbitrary computer “tinker-toy” process to invent a description of the virus. The virus that no one has proven exists. This is the basic conclusion of Dr. Tom Cowan.
The CDC article [3] was discovered by Sally Fallon Morrell. Her co-author, Dr. Cowan, fleshes out the fraud. Cowan’s article is titled, “Only Poisoned Monkey Cells ‘Grew’ the ‘Virus’.” [4] [5]
Dr. Cowan: “[The CDC journal article] was published in June 2020 [original publication, March 2020]. The purpose of the article was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to share this information with other scientists for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.”
“First, in the section titled ‘Whole Genome Sequencing,’ we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, they found 37 base pairs from unpurified samples using PCR probes. This means they actually looked at 37 out of the approximately 30,000 of the base pairs that are claimed to be the genome of the intact virus. They then took these 37 segments and put them into a computer program, which filled in the rest of the base pairs.”
In other words, the sequencing of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was done by assumption and arbitrary inference. If this is science, a penguin is a spaceship.
Cowan: “To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.”
“The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by ‘consensus,’ sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary ‘unicorn,’ so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn.”
As I’ve been stating [10], the “discovery” of the “new virus” was actually the foisting of a PRE-DETERMINED STORY ABOUT A VIRUS. Nothing real or believable about it.
But once the official pattern is laid down, others follow it dutifully.
Dr. Cowan uncovers more insanity in the CDC journal article. Using the ASSUMED new virus, in an UN-ISOLATED STATE, the researchers try to prove it is harmful by injecting it on to several different types of cells in the lab:
Cowan: “The real blockbuster finding in this study comes later, a finding so shocking that I had to read it many times before I could believe what I was reading. Let me quote the passage intact:”
“’Therefore, we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549), human liver cells (HUH 7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T). In addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells [monkey cells]. … Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of infection and examined 24h post-infection. No CPE was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero [monkey] cells, which grew to greater than 10 to the 7th power at 24 h post-infection. In contrast, HUH 7.0 and 293T showed only modest viral replication, and A549 cells [human cells] were incompatible with SARS CoV-2 infection’.”
“What does this language actually mean, and why is it the most shocking statement of all from the virology community? When virologists attempt to prove infection, they have three possible ‘hosts’ or models on which they can test…”
“The third method virologists use to prove infection and pathogenicity — the method they most rely on — is inoculation of solutions they say contain the virus onto a variety of tissue cultures. As I have pointed out many times, such inoculation has never been shown to kill (lyse) the tissue, unless the tissue is first starved and poisoned.”
“The shocking thing about the above [CDC journal] quote is that using their own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested. In plain English, this means they proved, on their terms, that this ‘new coronavirus’ is not infectious to human beings. It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells, and only then when you add two potent drugs (gentamicin and amphotericin), known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.”
“My friends, read this again and again. These virologists, published by the CDC, performed a clear proof, on their terms, showing that the SARS-CoV- 2 virus is harmless to human beings. That is the only possible conclusion, but, unfortunately, this result is not even mentioned in their conclusion. They simply say they can provide virus stocks cultured only on monkey Vero cells, thanks for coming.”
So first…use a process of genetic sequencing that involves concocting, out of an arbitrary computer program…
The existence and structure of the “new virus”…
And then, taking a soup that the researchers claim contains the virus, in an un-isolated state, inject the soup into several types of cells in the lab… And discover the prime target—human cells—are not infected by the imaginary virus. And after this good day’s work, walk away and pretend nothing odd or self-incriminating happened. And oh yes, lock down the planet based on this “science.” Naturally, we MUST take a toxic vaccine that prevents non-infection by the non-virus.
SOURCES:
[1] https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
[2] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/08/the-smoking-gun-where-is-the-coronavirus-the-cdc-says-it-isnt-available/
[3] https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article
[4] https://drtomcowan.com/only-poisoned-monkey-kidney-cells-grew-the-virus/
[5] http://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/19/dr-tom-cowan-explores-the-covid-virus-invented-out-of-sheer-nonsense/
[6] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/08/the-smoking-gun-where-is-the-coronavirus-the-cdc-says-it-isnt-available/
[7] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/09/covid-the-virus-that-isnt-there-the-root-fraud-exposed/
[8] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/12/the-fake-coronavirus-and-the-missing-study-the-secret-in-plain-sight/
[9] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/13/yet-another-case-of-the-missing-virus-they-lied-and-locked-down-the-world/
[10] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/15/if-the-virus-isnt-there-why-do-they-believe-it-is/
[11] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/22/the-virus-that-isnt-there-genetic-sequencing-and-the-magic-trick/
[12] https://www.andrewkaufmanmd.com/
[13] https://drtomcowan.com
[14] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/category/covid/
*********
Pictorial content and emphasis added by (TLB) editors
(TLB) published this original article from the blog of Jon Rappoport with our appreciation for his contribution to raise health and freedom awareness.
Jon Rappoport is the author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-10-27--‘Media Firemen’ Scramble to Save Biden Candidacy

Watching the media scramble these last two weeks to save Joe Biden ’ s candidacy , I am reminded of a scene in Ray Bradbury ’ s 1953 dystopian sci-fi classic , Fahrenheit 451 , 451 degrees Fahrenheit being the temperature at which paper burns .
In the novel , the state employs “ firemen ” to burn paper lest the few civilians who care about books avail themselves of information the state does not want them to have .
During the Biden stretch run , the firemen on the left have shredded what is left of their reputations as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ does not want their audiences to have .
Even before Hunter Biden ’ s laptop surfaced , the media busied themselves suppressing information that was readily available to the ordinary citizen — montages of Biden plagiarizing , groping little girls , making racially insensitive comments , eulogizing exalted KKK cyclops , threatening Ukrainian prosecutors , even sexually assaulting at least one very credible Democrat — and they did so with enough success that the Biden camp felt comfortable positioning Joe as the candidate with “ character.
” The Hunter laptop was too tangible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Joseph Goebbels urged the German Student Union “ to commit to the flames the evil spirit of the past ” has a western nation so flagrantly thrown in on the side of ignorance .
Twitter has gotten most of the attention for its total blocking of the New York Post , which broke the laptop story , but the firemen at NPR were not far behind .
“ We don ’ t want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories , and we don ’ t want to waste @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on stories that are just pure distractions , ” NPR Managing Editor for News Terence Samuel told his audience in the way of answering a reader question .
“ And quite frankly , that ’ s where we ended up , this was… a politically driven event and we decided to treat it that way.
” NPR ’ s public editor added that , in any case , “ the assertions don ’ t amount to much.
” Had it not been for the final debate , the firemen might have succeeded in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dark about what Trump called the “ laptop from hell.
” Knowing the subject would surface , Biden came prepared .
He dismissed the laptop as a “ Russian plant ” and had his allies line up some 50 “ intelligence ” officials who seemed to agree with him .
The more sober members of the major media knew the “ Russia , Russia , Russia ” accusation — as Trump aptly mocked it — was insane , but it was out there .
No longer able to burn it , they had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ honors for sophistry in this effort go to the Washington Post and its “ disinformation and political warfare ” fireman , Thomas Rid .
To his credit , Rid acknowledged that Biden ’ s 50 intelligence officials conceded they “ did not have evidence of Russian involvement.
” Rid added the obvious , namely that there is good reason to be skeptical of a foreign plot : Duh !
The remainder of Rid ’ s article – “ Insisting that the Hunter Biden laptop is fake is a trap .
So is insisting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is pure bait and switch .
It could make sense only to those mesmerized by the past four year of the Post ’ s Pulitzer Prize-winning disinformation .
Rid argues that “ the Russian interference of 2016 ” holds valuable lessons for 2020 .
In 2016 , unlike 2020 , Rid claims that the public had “ meaningful public artifacts on day one.
” He refers here to the alleged hack of the DNC servers in April 2016 .
The initial Post article from June 14 , 2016 — two months after the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by Julian Assange ’ s appearance on a British TV show two days earlier .
On that occasion , Assange told the interviewer , “ We have upcoming leaks in relation to Hillary Clinton , ” adding ominously , “ We have emails.
” If Assange released damaging emails , the Clinton campaign needed to establish an alternative story line to offset the pending embarrassment .
No doubt it would be more politically useful to portray Hillary as a victim of a Russian plot on Trump ’ s behalf than as a criminally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ did release Hillary ’ s emails .
He did , however , release emails purloined from the DNC servers and from Hillary campaign chair John Podesta , the first in July , the second in October .
The emails may have been embarrassing , but they were not “ disinformation.
” They were “ information.
” No one serious disputed their legitimacy .
As to Rid ’ s “ meaningful public artifacts , ” they were not exactly public , nor particularly meaningful .
In fact , the artifacts were held tight by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ DNC hired to examine its servers , a firm that , according to the Post , did not even pretend to know “ how the hackers got in.
” Scandalous in its own right was the willingness of the Obama DoJ to allow the DNC to sidestep the FBI and hire a private firm on a matter of the highest national security .
By contrast , John Paul MacIsaac , the computer repair storeowner , promptly took the Biden laptop to the FBI when he became aware of its contents .
Rid tells @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
He does not mention that “ CrowdStrike is a deeply Democratic firm ” served up to the DNC by Perkins Coie , the same law firm used as a DNC cut-out on the Steele dossier .
In fact , Rid does not mention CrowdStrike at all .
Nor , most tellingly , does Rid mention Christopher Steele or his infamous dossier .
Yes , a massive disinformation campaign took place in 2016 and the years following .
Yes , it involved Russians .
Yes , the conspirators — likely including some of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — conspired to smear a candidate for president with nonsense allegations that defied the most desperate attempts at confirmation .
“ We must treat the Hunter Biden leaks as if they were a foreign intelligence operation — even if they probably aren ’ t , ” says Rid .
Alice ’ s Queen of Hearts could not have said it better .

By: Jack Cashill
Watching the media scramble these last two weeks to save Joe Biden’s candidacy, I am reminded of a scene in Ray Bradbury’s 1953 dystopian sci-fi classic, Fahrenheit 451, 451 degrees Fahrenheit being the temperature at which paper burns.
In the novel, the state employs “firemen” to burn paper lest the few civilians who care about books avail themselves of information the state does not want them to have. During the Biden stretch run, the firemen on the left have shredded what is left of their reputations as journalists to destroy information the Deep State does not want their audiences to have.
Even before Hunter Biden’s laptop surfaced, the media busied themselves suppressing information that was readily available to the ordinary citizen — montages of Biden plagiarizing, groping little girls, making racially insensitive comments, eulogizing exalted KKK cyclops, threatening Ukrainian prosecutors, even sexually assaulting at least one very credible Democrat — and they did so with enough success that the Biden camp felt comfortable positioning Joe as the candidate with “character.”
The Hunter laptop was too tangible to dispose of subtly. Not since Joseph Goebbels urged the German Student Union “to commit to the flames the evil spirit of the past” has a western nation so flagrantly thrown in on the side of ignorance. Twitter has gotten most of the attention for its total blocking of the New York Post, which broke the laptop story, but the firemen at NPR were not far behind.
“We don’t want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories, and we don’t want to waste the listeners’ and readers’ time on stories that are just pure distractions,” NPR Managing Editor for News Terence Samuel told his audience in the way of answering a reader question. “And quite frankly, that’s where we ended up, this was… a politically driven event and we decided to treat it that way.” NPR’s public editor added that, in any case, “the assertions don’t amount to much.”
Had it not been for the final debate, the firemen might have succeeded in keeping major media audiences fully in the dark about what Trump called the “laptop from hell.” Knowing the subject would surface, Biden came prepared. He dismissed the laptop as a “Russian plant” and had his allies line up some 50 “intelligence” officials who seemed to agree with him.
The more sober members of the major media knew the “Russia, Russia, Russia” accusation — as Trump aptly mocked it — was insane, but it was out there. No longer able to burn it, they had to finesse it into insignificance. Top honors for sophistry in this effort go to the Washington Post and its “disinformation and political warfare” fireman, Thomas Rid.
To his credit, Rid acknowledged that Biden’s 50 intelligence officials conceded they “did not have evidence of Russian involvement.” Rid added the obvious, namely that there is good reason to be skeptical of a foreign plot:
If a competent Russian intelligence agency went to the length of procuring hacked material, blending it with forgeries, perhaps researching a suitable surfacing locale and setup in Wilmington and surfacing the package in a human intelligence operation that required careful planning — then it’s highly likely that agency would have found, or more likely forged, files that would have actual political impact, instead of the unremarkable material revealed in the Post so far.
Duh! The remainder of Rid’s article – “Insisting that the Hunter Biden laptop is fake is a trap. So is insisting that it’s real” — is pure bait and switch. It could make sense only to those mesmerized by the past four year of the Post’s Pulitzer Prize-winning disinformation.
Rid argues that “the Russian interference of 2016” holds valuable lessons for 2020. In 2016, unlike 2020, Rid claims that the public had “meaningful public artifacts on day one.” He refers here to the alleged hack of the DNC servers in April 2016.
The initial Post article from June 14, 2016 — two months after the hack — may well have been prompted by Julian Assange’s appearance on a British TV show two days earlier. On that occasion, Assange told the interviewer, “We have upcoming leaks in relation to Hillary Clinton,” adding ominously, “We have emails.”
If Assange released damaging emails, the Clinton campaign needed to establish an alternative story line to offset the pending embarrassment. No doubt it would be more politically useful to portray Hillary as a victim of a Russian plot on Trump’s behalf than as a criminally negligent keeper of secrets.
Assange never did release Hillary’s emails. He did, however, release emails purloined from the DNC servers and from Hillary campaign chair John Podesta, the first in July, the second in October. The emails may have been embarrassing, but they were not “disinformation.” They were “information.” No one serious disputed their legitimacy.
As to Rid’s “meaningful public artifacts,” they were not exactly public, nor particularly meaningful. In fact, the artifacts were held tight by CrowdStrike, the cybersecurity firm that the DNC hired to examine its servers, a firm that, according to the Post, did not even pretend to know “how the hackers got in.”
Scandalous in its own right was the willingness of the Obama DoJ to allow the DNC to sidestep the FBI and hire a private firm on a matter of the highest national security. By contrast, John Paul MacIsaac, the computer repair storeowner, promptly took the Biden laptop to the FBI when he became aware of its contents.
Rid tells us that MacIsaac is a Trump supporter. He does not mention that “CrowdStrike is a deeply Democratic firm” served up to the DNC by Perkins Coie, the same law firm used as a DNC cut-out on the Steele dossier. In fact, Rid does not mention CrowdStrike at all.
Nor, most tellingly, does Rid mention Christopher Steele or his infamous dossier. Yes, a massive disinformation campaign took place in 2016 and the years following. Yes, it involved Russians. Yes, the conspirators — likely including some of the 50 Biden “intelligence” operatives — conspired to smear a candidate for president with nonsense allegations that defied the most desperate attempts at confirmation.
“We must treat the Hunter Biden leaks as if they were a foreign intelligence operation — even if they probably aren’t,” says Rid. Alice’s Queen of Hearts could not have said it better.
••••
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …


thelibertybeacon--2020-10-27--The Repression Against Prof. Didier Raoult Begins

ER Editor : The war to lock us down unnecessarily , crash the economy , and deliver as many tax dollars to Big Pharma for dubious new drugs like the virtually useless but very expensive Remdesivir goes on unabated in France .
Marseille ’ s Didier Raoult , an advocate of the cheap hydroxychloroquine drug , keeps speaking out against this , becoming his own symbol of the Gilets Jaunes-type of France the French Government and the World Economic Forum ( Schwab mentions them by name in his publications ) would like to wish away .
Businessman and publisher , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of pushing Ordinary France , who is squarely behind Raoult , too far .
Prominent Paris physician Prof. Christian Perronne , mentioned below and similarly critical of the government , has been removed from his position as President of the Scientific Council for the French Lyme Disease Association .
For several months now , Didier Raoult has been embarrassing the executive , and particularly Olivier Véran ( ER : the health minister since February ) , with whom he has maintained execrable relations ( of public notoriety ) .
This time , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ executive power as a whole to carry out a severe repression against the Marseille scientist .
This authoritarian reaction is a very dangerous gamble… The Didier Raoult phenomenon is now a kind of counter-power in France .
The Marseilles scientist , with his slightly crazy charisma , has crystallized on his image and on his person a whole French aspiration for a renewal of the elites .
Since Friday ( Oct 23 ) , a very reckless and clumsy repression has fallen upon him .
Olivier Véran ’ s rigidity risks doing political @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the Minister has understood this .
Translation : Dominique Martin , director of ANSM , refuses a temporary use authorization for hydroxychloroquine but authorises promotional materials to be sent by Gilead for Remdesivir and organizes free distribution of it .
Double standards .
As the weeks went by , Didier Raoult ’ s pronouncements became very embarrassing for the government .
There is now the official analysis in Paris , and the word from Marseille , which say the opposite , that the government speaks of a health emergency , while Didier @ @ @ @ @ @ @ less dramatic than it is said to be .
That the government orders a lockdown or almost a lockdown in Marseilles , and the word of Didier Raoult is invoked to contest it .
There are now two France ’ s that have been drawn , that of Olivier Véran , Gilead and Remdesivir , who decide from Paris , preferably without consulting anyone except for a few authorized white coats .
And there is peripheral France ( ER : a reference to the Yellow Vests and French life that is not centered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and skepticism , whose capital is Marseille .
Between these two Frances , the gap is widening , largely under the blows of Olivier Véran ’ s pickaxe and a government out of touch with reality .
It is not certain that the strong manner in which the minister has handled the Raoult dossier is totally struck from the corner of common sense… because the balance of power is in fact uncertain .
On Friday , the French Drug Agency refused to issue a temporary recommendation for use ( RTU ) to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for hydroxychloroquine .
In other words , if the IHU continues to prescribe hydroxychloroquine against the coronavirus , it will do so outside of the marketing authorization and at the patient ’ s expense .
The decision of the Agence du Médicament has the effect of preventing reimbursement by health insurance , but does not prevent the IHU from prescribing .
At the same time , and in a tweet quoted above , the government reimburses Gilead ’ s Remdesivir , which is much more expensive and whose effectiveness has not been better @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ER : See this recent Zerohedge report titled This double standard obviously raises a political storm ( including a strong reaction from Renaud Muselier – ER : longtime French politician for the Marseille area ) even though the French Drug Agency was careful to justify its decision in seven pages and did not close the door to a temporary recommendation on the assumption that the IHU would provide conclusive scientific studies .
The problem is that the antagonism is so virulent between the Parisian institutions and the Marseilles institute that the precautions taken @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inaudible .
To top it all off , this weekend Facebook deactivated the 500,000-member group created in support of Didier Raoult .
No explanation was given by the American social network for this unilateral decision , as usual .
In the silence of this authoritarian deactivation , minds should not be long in suspecting the government of having acted behind the scenes to silence awkward opponents .
As it stands , there is no evidence of this .
But , in any case , this kind of Chinese-style decision should not help to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a scientific controversy into a political explosion and irreconcilable rift between the French .
Translation : The Order of Doctors treats Prof. Raoult like all the other doctors listed in the register .
Notoriety changes nothing in the deontology of things .
Prof. Raout is currently in a situation in which the institution has called on him and is going to be required to take a certain number of decisions .
Raoult sanctioned by the Order of Physicians ?
The repression against Didier Raoult should not stop there .
In an interview given @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Order of Doctors , Patrick Bouet , whose words we quote above , announced a cascade of disciplinary proceedings against doctors who express themselves in the press .
He makes no secret of his intention to sanction Profs .
Didier Raoult and Christian Perrone , who oppose the government and put forward their point of view publicly .
This is a measure of the additional risk taken by the institution in this strategy of power struggle .
A Raoult sanctioned by his Order ( need we recall that this Order was created by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ regime that was sympathetic to the Nazis during WWII ) would definitively become the symbol of resistance to decisions taken in Paris without consultation and without the possibility of discussing them .
In this kind of strategy , it is better to make sure in advance that the balance of power is in favor of the sanctioner… otherwise the disciplinary decision opens the door to many ‘ adventures ’ .
While the government has fixated itself on hydroxychloroquine and conscientiously , methodically transforms Didier Raoult into a martyr of neo-Jacobinism , pharmacists see @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that we listed last week .
The phenomenon worries the Order of Pharmacists ( COVID is definitely giving these creations of Pétain ( ER : the leader of pro-Nazi Vichy regime ) a hard time ) , which wants to take control of the situation .
It would be a question of registering all patients who would use molecules ( ER : like hydroxychloroquine ) not recommended by the government .
At the rate we are going , the Republic should not be long in transforming itself into a new China , in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enlightenment , of course .
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

ER Editor: The war to lock us down unnecessarily, crash the economy, and deliver as many tax dollars to Big Pharma for dubious new drugs like the virtually useless but very expensive Remdesivir goes on unabated in France.
Marseille’s Didier Raoult, an advocate of the cheap hydroxychloroquine drug, keeps speaking out against this, becoming his own symbol of the Gilets Jaunes-type of France the French Government and the World Economic Forum (Schwab mentions them by name in his publications) would like to wish away. Businessman and publisher, Eric Verhaeghe warns against the political wisdom of pushing Ordinary France, who is squarely behind Raoult, too far.
Prominent Paris physician Prof. Christian Perronne, mentioned below and similarly critical of the government, has been removed from his position as President of the Scientific Council for the French Lyme Disease Association.
********
The Repression Against Prof. Didier Raoult Begins
ERIC VERHAEGHE
For several months now, Didier Raoult has been embarrassing the executive, and particularly Olivier Véran (ER: the health minister since February), with whom he has maintained execrable relations (of public notoriety). This time, the minister has visibly succeeded in convincing the executive power as a whole to carry out a severe repression against the Marseille scientist. This authoritarian reaction is a very dangerous gamble…
The Didier Raoult phenomenon is now a kind of counter-power in France.
The Marseilles scientist, with his slightly crazy charisma, has crystallized on his image and on his person a whole French aspiration for a renewal of the elites. Since Friday (Oct 23), a very reckless and clumsy repression has fallen upon him. Olivier Véran’s rigidity risks doing political damage, and we are not sure that the Minister has understood this.
Translation: Dominique Martin, director of ANSM, refuses a temporary use authorization for hydroxychloroquine but authorises promotional materials to be sent by Gilead for Remdesivir and organizes free distribution of it. Double standards.
Didier Raoult, that annoying counter-power
As the weeks went by, Didier Raoult’s pronouncements became very embarrassing for the government. There is now the official analysis in Paris, and the word from Marseille, which say the opposite, that the government speaks of a health emergency, while Didier Raoult assures everyone that the situation is less dramatic than it is said to be. That the government orders a lockdown or almost a lockdown in Marseilles, and the word of Didier Raoult is invoked to contest it.
There are now two France’s that have been drawn, that of Olivier Véran, Gilead and Remdesivir, who decide from Paris, preferably without consulting anyone except for a few authorized white coats. And there is peripheral France (ER: a reference to the Yellow Vests and French life that is not centered in Paris), that of hydroxychloroquine and skepticism, whose capital is Marseille. Between these two Frances, the gap is widening, largely under the blows of Olivier Véran’s pickaxe and a government out of touch with reality.
It is not certain that the strong manner in which the minister has handled the Raoult dossier is totally struck from the corner of common sense… because the balance of power is in fact uncertain.
No temporary authorization for hydroxychloroquine
On Friday, the French Drug Agency refused to issue a temporary recommendation for use (RTU) to the IHU of Marseille led by Didier Raoult for hydroxychloroquine. In other words, if the IHU continues to prescribe hydroxychloroquine against the coronavirus, it will do so outside of the marketing authorization and at the patient’s expense. The decision of the Agence du Médicament has the effect of preventing reimbursement by health insurance, but does not prevent the IHU from prescribing.
At the same time, and in a tweet quoted above, the government reimburses Gilead’s Remdesivir, which is much more expensive and whose effectiveness has not been better demonstrated than that of hydroxychloroquine. (ER: See this recent Zerohedge report titled FDA Approves Gilead’s Remdesivir To Treat COVID-19 Despite Data Showing Drug Doesn’t Work)
This double standard obviously raises a political storm (including a strong reaction from Renaud Muselier – ER: longtime French politician for the Marseille area) even though the French Drug Agency was careful to justify its decision in seven pages and did not close the door to a temporary recommendation on the assumption that the IHU would provide conclusive scientific studies.
The problem is that the antagonism is so virulent between the Parisian institutions and the Marseilles institute that the precautions taken by the Agence du Médicament seem quite inaudible.
The Facebook group ” Didier Raoult ” deactivated this weekend
To top it all off, this weekend Facebook deactivated the 500,000-member group created in support of Didier Raoult. No explanation was given by the American social network for this unilateral decision, as usual. In the silence of this authoritarian deactivation, minds should not be long in suspecting the government of having acted behind the scenes to silence awkward opponents.
As it stands, there is no evidence of this. But, in any case, this kind of Chinese-style decision should not help to calm spirits. Or how to turn a scientific controversy into a political explosion and irreconcilable rift between the French.
Translation: The Order of Doctors treats Prof. Raoult like all the other doctors listed in the register. Notoriety changes nothing in the deontology of things. Prof. Raout is currently in a situation in which the institution has called on him and is going to be required to take a certain number of decisions.
Raoult sanctioned by the Order of Physicians?
The repression against Didier Raoult should not stop there. In an interview given to Egora, the President of the Order of Doctors, Patrick Bouet, whose words we quote above, announced a cascade of disciplinary proceedings against doctors who express themselves in the press. He makes no secret of his intention to sanction Profs. Didier Raoult and Christian Perrone, who oppose the government and put forward their point of view publicly.
This is a measure of the additional risk taken by the institution in this strategy of power struggle. A Raoult sanctioned by his Order (need we recall that this Order was created by Vichy? – ER: the French regime that was sympathetic to the Nazis during WWII) would definitively become the symbol of resistance to decisions taken in Paris without consultation and without the possibility of discussing them. In this kind of strategy, it is better to make sure in advance that the balance of power is in favor of the sanctioner… otherwise the disciplinary decision opens the door to many ‘adventures’.
Pharmacists overwhelmed by new demands
While the government has fixated itself on hydroxychloroquine and conscientiously, methodically transforms Didier Raoult into a martyr of neo-Jacobinism, pharmacists see patients arriving with prescriptions for new molecules that we listed last week. The phenomenon worries the Order of Pharmacists (COVID is definitely giving these creations of Pétain (ER: the leader of pro-Nazi Vichy regime) a hard time), which wants to take control of the situation. It would be a question of registering all patients who would use molecules (ER: like hydroxychloroquine) not recommended by the government.
At the rate we are going, the Republic should not be long in transforming itself into a new China, in the name of democracy, protection and enlightenment, of course.
************
Source
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-10-27--Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: International Message for Freedom and Hope [VIDEO]

ER Editor : Thanks to Mark Taliano ‘ s site for making this transcript available .
Find Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his team of experts at his site , Children ’ s Health Defense .
Also on Youtube here .
Visit his new European site at https : //childrenshealthdefense.eu/ .
Today , October 24 , 2020 , there are many rallies around the world .
Activists in these countries are joining in a common voice : Argentina , Bolivia , Peru , Uruguay , Italy , Germany , Poland , Belgium , Netherlands , United Kingdom , Ireland , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Austria .
Citizens of all countries are paying an enormous price for the pandemic .
They have not only lost their loved ones , but their freedoms , their livelihood , their joy .
Children and youth are suffering due to this crisis , too .
Without their friends and social activities , mental health problems in our young are at an all-time high .
People around the world are demanding to be spared from the devastating consequences of the pandemic .
Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. , Chairman of Children ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for freedom and hope to activists around the world .
Hey , everybody , it ’ s Robert F. Kennedy Jr. here , and I can not tell you how happy I am to be able to have this opportunity to talk to thousands of citizens in 15 countries and all the continents in the world who have come together today to protest this coup d ’ état by big data , by big telecom , by big tech , by the big oil and chemical companies , and by the global public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the WHO that now amounts to two trillion dollars and wants to magnify and amplify its wealth and its power over our lives , over our liberties , It wants to subvert our democracy and wants to destroy our sovereignty and our control over our lives and our children ’ s health .
The only thing that we have to fear is fear itself And I want to remind you , those of you who are not Americans , of something that every American child learns when we ’ re growing up in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ during the Great Depression , Franklin Roosevelt , who was one of the greatest presidents in American history , said to the American people : “ the only thing that we have to fear is fear itself ” And we grow up hearing that but people don ’ t really understand what it means .
And it was a very , very profound warning by Roosevelt because he saw what the Great Depression was doing in Eastern Europe , in Italy and Germany and Spain , where that crisis was turning people towards @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the same crisis was turning citizens and governments towards communism and also causing the collapse of governments all over the world .
And in our country , in the United States , it ’ s hard for people to remember today that almost a third of the people in our country were completely disillusioned with capitalism and wanted to turn to communism and another third wanted to turn to fascism .
And Franklin Roosevelt wanted to preserve our country for democracy , for free market capitalism , for civil rights and to preserve @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the weapon of authoritarian control was going to be fear .
And when I spoke a few weeks ago in Berlin , I reminded the people of Germany of a very famous story that happened during the Nuremberg trials after World War Two , when Hitler ’ s closest lieutenant , the head of the Luftwaffe , Hermann Goering , was asked by one of the prosecutors , how did you get the German people ?
– the German people are the most educated people in the world , they were some of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The Weimar Republic was one of the strongest democracies in the world .
How did you take them ?
These people were so well educated and so awakened and so tolerant and turned them into obedient slaves who had committed some of the worst atrocities in human history ?
and Goering said , ” oh , that ’ s a simple thing.
” And any of you can look up his quote and I urge you to do so .
And he said , “ And it works not just in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a democracy , in a monarchy and in a communist government , and any government that you want , the job of the government is to put the people in fear .
And and if you can keep them in fear , you can get them to do anything that you want them to do , that they will turn into sheep .
And there ’ s a famous book by Naomi Klein and all of us should read called Disaster Capitalism .
And that book shows it ’ s a historical chronology @ @ @ @ @ @ @ history , the history of the world during the Great Depression and during the financial collapse in 2008 , during the financial collapse in Chile , for example , in 1973 , during the time of the World Trade Center bombing , that authoritarian elements in a society and large corporations and wealthy plutocrats and oligarchs , wealthy families and individuals use crises to shift wealth upward to obliterate the middle classes of those countries and to clamp down totalitarian control .
And of course , that ’ s an obvious thing that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their governments are not going to vote for policies that make the rich people richer and give corporations even more power over their lives , that reduce democracy and reduce civil rights .
These are not good vessels for populism , in order to transform the government so that it will reward the rich with even more wealth .
The first civil right that they begin with is freedom of speech The people who want to do that , the large corporations who orchestrate that kind of change , have to get rid @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right that they begin with is freedom of speech .
They need to clamp down censorship because censorship is the most important right .
And our country , we put it , number one , the First Amendment of the Constitution , because all the other rights depend on it .
If a government can hide what it ’ s doing , it can get away with anything it wants .
If a corporation can lie to you and conceal information , if there ’ s no transparency in a democracy , you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , if you want to get rid of all the other rights , like freedom of assembly , which you are exercising today , some of you are exercising it at grave threats .
Some of you will suffer , some of you will be jailed , some of you will suffer injuries .
But that is a basic right , the right to freedom of expression , the right to a jury trial , the right to freedom of religion , the right to privacy , the right to have governments don @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your information .
All of those other rights can only be subverted if they begin imposing censorship , by being able to silence people who want to speak .
So the coup d ’ état that we are all fighting today is a coup d ’ état that starts with a conspiracy between the government agencies and the big technology companies that Silicon Valley billionaires , people like Zuckerberg and Bill Gates and the people who run Google and Facebook and Pinterest and all of these other Silicon Valley corporations who are now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we can not talk about our grievances , we can not say bad things about pharmaceutical products .
We can not question government policies that make no sense to us .
And I ’ m going to say a few things about some of those government policies .
Number one , I am not a conspiracy theorist .
I follow the facts .
I don ’ t know that the covid illness was laboratory generated in Wuhan .
There is plenty of evidence that it was , but not enough evidence for me @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact .
My question is , why don ’ t we know the answer to that ?
Why is Tony Fauci not being asked that question ?
Why is President Trump not launching an investigation ?
or President Xi Jinping or the presidents of any of these countries ?
Saying , “ Where did this come from ?
” Because we need to know that , but global citizens , this is the worst calamity in history .
And nobody seems curious about where this actually comes from ?
We know it didn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the wet market in Wuhan .
And that story was a fable that now has no basis , in fact .
And we have Nobel laureates , and we have large institutions and investigative agencies and prosecutorial agencies are saying , ” we think it came from the Wuhan lab , and we think that it may have come from studies that were funded by Bill Gates and Tony Fauci .
I don ’ t know if this is true .
Why are our government officials not asking that as the number one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ police to suppress dissent , are they not sending the police to question people who may know the answer to that question .
There are many other questions that I ’ d like to know the answer to .
Questions about masks .
I ’ m very willing to accept if the masks work .
Then I want to wear them , if they ’ re going to protect other people from transmissibility , then I want to wear them , but the studies I have seen indicate that they do not work @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
There ’ s some that say they may work under limited circumstances .
What I don ’ t want to be told is : they work and you ’ re going to wear them , and you ’ d better not ask questions about it .
Most Americans and most of people on this planet , we want leadership but we don ’ t want bullying .
And we know the difference between bullying and leadership .
We want to know the truth about hydroxychloroquine , we want to know why are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and only 1.4 $ billion on therapeutic drugs .
What is the sense of that ?
There are many , many other questions that we , in a democracy , have a right to have answered , without being called conspiracy theorists , without being vilified as “ inconsiderate ” or being “ bad citizens ” .
Everybody who ’ s part of these demonstrations are people who are striving with their lives to become good citizens .
Now let me tell you what we need to do to win this battle , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is with democracy .
We need to fight to win our democracy back , to reclaim our democracy from these villains who are stealing it from us .
And you notice the people who are getting richest from this quarantine are the same people who are censoring criticism of the quarantine .
Who ’ s becoming the richest ?
Jeffrey Bezos , $ 83 billion he ’ s made , and he owns Amazon , and he ’ s censoring books that criticize the quarantine .
Zuckerburg , who owns Facebook , who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dollars by this quarantine and he is censoring information that is critical of the quarantine .
He censors my Instagram , he censors my Facebook , my Twitter page is also censored .
And all of these people are people who are making billions of dollars on the quarantine .
And what I want to know is a simple question : is the quarantine actually effective ?
You know we ’ ve had plenty of pandemics in the past .
In 1969 , we had a Hong Kong Flu pandemic that killed 100,000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s the equivalent of 200,000 people today who are being killed by coronavirus .
Did we go into lockdown ?
No .
Did we wear masks ?
No .
We went to Woodstock .
We went to the Democratic Convention in Chicago and had huge crowds of people .
Nobody was told to lockdown , and don ’ t see your girlfriend , and wear a mask and don ’ t go out of your house , and shutdown your business and bankrupt every business in the country .
Last year , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ world who died from tuberculosis .
We have 1.6 million people die every year from tuberculosis .
We ’ re not wearing masks .
We ’ re not on lockdown .
What ’ s the difference between tuberculosis and coronavirus ?
Tuberculosis has a vaccine , and the vaccine costs about $ 3 and that ’ s why we ’ re not on lockdown because nobody is making $ 39 a vaccine , or $ 300 a vaccine , the way that Moderna , and AstraZeneca , and Johnson & Johnson are making @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the only reason that I can think of .
And I ’ m happy if somebody tells me there ’ s another reason , but let ’ s hear it .
Don ’ t just shut me up .
Don ’ t just tell me that I can ’ t debate .
Here ’ s what we need to do .
We need to do exactly what you ’ re doing today .
We need to come out on the street and we need to stick together .
They want everybody polarized What @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Mark Zuckerberg , and Jeffrey Bezos , and Bill Gates , and Toni Fauci want you to do is they want us fighting with each other , they want blacks fighting against whites , they want republicans fighting against democrats , they want everybody polarized , they want everybody fragmented , cause they know if we all get together , we ’ re going to start questions , and those are questions that they can ’ t answer , “ why are you getting rich ?
” And “ Why are we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ What ’ s the difference between tuberculosis and coronvirus ?
” And “ Why are we not wearing masks for tuberculosis but we are for the coronavirus ?
” And “ Where did it all come from ?
” And all of those questions that we deserve an answer to that we ’ re not getting answers , we need to stick together .
If you ’ re a republican or a democrat , stop talking about that .
Stop identifying yourself .
The enemy is Big Tech , Big Data , Big @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cartel , the government totalitarian elements that are trying to oppress us , that are trying to rob us from our liberties , of our democracy , of our freedom of thought , of our freedom of expression , of our freedom of assembly , and all of the freedoms that give dignity to humanity .
And the last thing that all of us need to do is we need to stay educated and informed .
One of the things that I want to announce to you today is that Children ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ help of many of you who are in these crowds , is launching a journal , a daily journal , and we are going to weaponize information for you , we ’ re going to tell you what the newest science is .
We ’ re going to be the enemies of censorship We ’ re going to take all the information that is censored everywhere else and we ’ re going to reprint it in our publication , and you can get that everyday , so , if you see something that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about it because we want to put it up .
We are going to be the enemies of censorship .
We are going to be the refuge , and we ’ re going to allow debate .
We ’ re going to make sure it ’ s civil debate .
We ’ re going to encourage people to be non-partisan .
But we ’ re going to allow people to comment and have different opinions than us , we are not scared of debate , the way pharmaceutical companies and Bill Gates and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Toni Fauci , are terrified of debate .
We welcome debate , we want to hear if we ’ ve got a different opinion than me , I want to hear about it , and I want to see your science .
And I want the public to hear us talking about it and debating about it because the free-flow of information , the cauldron of debate is the only thing that allows governments to develop rational policies in which self-governance will actually work and triumph .
You are on the front @ @ @ @ @ @ @ history and it is the battle to save democracy and freedom and human liberty and human dignity from this totalitarian cartel that is trying to rob us simultaneously in every nation in the world of the rights that every human being is born with .
So thank you for your courage , thank you for your commitment , so thank you for your brotherhood , and I can pledge to you , I will go down dying with my boots on , fighting side-by-side with all of you to make sure that we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our children .
And I will see all of you on the barricades , thank you .
Featured image is a screenshot from the video

ER Editor: Thanks to Mark Taliano ‘s site for making this transcript available. Find Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his team of experts at his site, Children’s Health Defense . Also on Youtube here . Visit his new European site at https://childrenshealthdefense.eu/ .
Today, October 24, 2020, there are many rallies around the world. Activists in these countries are joining in a common voice: Argentina, Bolivia, Peru, Uruguay, Italy, Germany, Poland, Belgium, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Ireland, Sweden, Denmark, France, and Austria.
Citizens of all countries are paying an enormous price for the pandemic. They have not only lost their loved ones, but their freedoms, their livelihood, their joy. Children and youth are suffering due to this crisis, too. Without their friends and social activities, mental health problems in our young are at an all-time high. People around the world are demanding to be spared from the devastating consequences of the pandemic.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Chairman of Children’s Health Defense, provides an inspirational message for freedom and hope to activists around the world.
Full transcript by Transcript by Rawan R. Mahmasa
Hey, everybody, it’s Robert F. Kennedy Jr. here, and I cannot tell you how happy I am to be able to have this opportunity to talk to thousands of citizens in 15 countries and all the continents in the world who have come together today to protest this coup d’état by big data, by big telecom, by big tech, by the big oil and chemical companies, and by the global public health cartel led by Bill Gates and the WHO that now amounts to two trillion dollars and wants to magnify and amplify its wealth and its power over our lives, over our liberties,
It wants to subvert our democracy and wants to destroy our sovereignty and our control over our lives and our children’s health.
The only thing that we have to fear is fear itself
And I want to remind you, those of you who are not Americans, of something that every American child learns when we’re growing up in this country about our history. And during the Great Depression, Franklin Roosevelt, who was one of the greatest presidents in American history, said to the American people: “the only thing that we have to fear is fear itself”
And we grow up hearing that but people don’t really understand what it means. And it was a very, very profound warning by Roosevelt because he saw what the Great Depression was doing in Eastern Europe, in Italy and Germany and Spain, where that crisis was turning people towards fascism in the eastern countries, where the same crisis was turning citizens and governments towards communism and also causing the collapse of governments all over the world. And in our country, in the United States, it’s hard for people to remember today that almost a third of the people in our country were completely disillusioned with capitalism and wanted to turn to communism and another third wanted to turn to fascism. And Franklin Roosevelt wanted to preserve our country for democracy, for free market capitalism, for civil rights and to preserve our Constitution.
And he recognized that the weapon of authoritarian control was going to be fear. And when I spoke a few weeks ago in Berlin, I reminded the people of Germany of a very famous story that happened during the Nuremberg trials after World War Two, when Hitler’s closest lieutenant, the head of the Luftwaffe, Hermann Goering, was asked by one of the prosecutors, how did you get the German people? – the German people are the most educated people in the world, they were some of the most tolerant people in the world. The Weimar Republic was one of the strongest democracies in the world. How did you take them? These people were so well educated and so awakened and so tolerant and turned them into obedient slaves who had committed some of the worst atrocities in human history? and Goering said, ”oh, that’s a simple thing.” And any of you can look up his quote and I urge you to do so. And he said, “And it works not just in the fascist government, but it works in a democracy, in a monarchy and in a communist government, and any government that you want, the job of the government is to put the people in fear. And and if you can keep them in fear, you can get them to do anything that you want them to do, that they will turn into sheep.
And there’s a famous book by Naomi Klein and all of us should read called Disaster Capitalism. And that book shows it’s a historical chronology of all of the times in American history, the history of the world during the Great Depression and during the financial collapse in 2008, during the financial collapse in Chile, for example, in 1973, during the time of the World Trade Center bombing, that authoritarian elements in a society and large corporations and wealthy plutocrats and oligarchs, wealthy families and individuals use crises to shift wealth upward to obliterate the middle classes of those countries and to clamp down totalitarian control.
And of course, that’s an obvious thing that people who are used to voting for their governments are not going to vote for policies that make the rich people richer and give corporations even more power over their lives, that reduce democracy and reduce civil rights. These are not good vessels for populism, in order to transform the government so that it will reward the rich with even more wealth.
The first civil right that they begin with is freedom of speech
The people who want to do that, the large corporations who orchestrate that kind of change, have to get rid of civil rights. The first civil right that they begin with is freedom of speech. They need to clamp down censorship because censorship is the most important right. And our country, we put it, number one, the First Amendment of the Constitution, because all the other rights depend on it. If a government can hide what it’s doing, it can get away with anything it wants.
If a corporation can lie to you and conceal information, if there’s no transparency in a democracy, you do not have a democracy. So, if you want to get rid of all the other rights, like freedom of assembly, which you are exercising today, some of you are exercising it at grave threats. Some of you will suffer, some of you will be jailed, some of you will suffer injuries.
But that is a basic right, the right to freedom of expression, the right to a jury trial, the right to freedom of religion, the right to privacy, the right to have governments don’t spy on you and keep your information.
All of those other rights can only be subverted if they begin imposing censorship, by being able to silence people who want to speak. So the coup d’état that we are all fighting today is a coup d’état that starts with a conspiracy between the government agencies and the big technology companies that Silicon Valley billionaires, people like Zuckerberg and Bill Gates and the people who run Google and Facebook and Pinterest and all of these other Silicon Valley corporations who are now in this conspiracy to make sure that we cannot talk about our grievances, we cannot say bad things about pharmaceutical products.
We cannot question government policies that make no sense to us. And I’m going to say a few things about some of those government policies. Number one, I am not a conspiracy theorist. I follow the facts. I don’t know that the covid illness was laboratory generated in Wuhan. There is plenty of evidence that it was, but not enough evidence for me to say that it’s a fact. My question is, why don’t we know the answer to that?
Why is Tony Fauci not being asked that question? Why is President Trump not launching an investigation? or President Xi Jinping or the presidents of any of these countries? Saying, “Where did this come from?” Because we need to know that, but global citizens, this is the worst calamity in history. And nobody seems curious about where this actually comes from?
We know it didn’t come from a bat in the wet market in Wuhan.
And that story was a fable that now has no basis, in fact.
And we have Nobel laureates, and we have large institutions and investigative agencies and prosecutorial agencies are saying, ”we think it came from the Wuhan lab, and we think that it may have come from studies that were funded by Bill Gates and Tony Fauci. I don’t know if this is true. Why are our government officials not asking that as the number one question? Why instead of sending their police to suppress dissent, are they not sending the police to question people who may know the answer to that question.
There are many other questions that I’d like to know the answer to. Questions about masks. I’m very willing to accept if the masks work. Then I want to wear them, if they’re going to protect other people from transmissibility, then I want to wear them, but the studies I have seen indicate that they do not work against viral transmission for the most part. There’s some that say they may work under limited circumstances. What I don’t want to be told is: they work and you’re going to wear them, and you’d better not ask questions about it.
Most Americans and most of people on this planet, we want leadership but we don’t want bullying. And we know the difference between bullying and leadership. We want to know the truth about hydroxychloroquine, we want to know why are we spending 18$ billion on vaccines and only 1.4$ billion on therapeutic drugs. What is the sense of that? There are many, many other questions that we, in a democracy, have a right to have answered, without being called conspiracy theorists, without being vilified as “inconsiderate” or being “bad citizens”.
Everybody who’s part of these demonstrations are people who are striving with their lives to become good citizens. Now let me tell you what we need to do to win this battle, the only way we can win it is with democracy. We need to fight to win our democracy back, to reclaim our democracy from these villains who are stealing it from us. And you notice the people who are getting richest from this quarantine are the same people who are censoring criticism of the quarantine.
Who’s becoming the richest? Jeffrey Bezos, $83 billion he’s made, and he owns Amazon, and he’s censoring books that criticize the quarantine. Zuckerburg, who owns Facebook, who’s made tens of billions of dollars by this quarantine and he is censoring information that is critical of the quarantine. He censors my Instagram, he censors my Facebook, my Twitter page is also censored. And all of these people are people who are making billions of dollars on the quarantine. And what I want to know is a simple question: is the quarantine actually effective?
You know we’ve had plenty of pandemics in the past. In 1969, we had a Hong Kong Flu pandemic that killed 100,000 people in the United States. It’s the equivalent of 200,000 people today who are being killed by coronavirus. Did we go into lockdown? No. Did we wear masks? No. We went to Woodstock. We went to the Democratic Convention in Chicago and had huge crowds of people. Nobody was told to lockdown, and don’t see your girlfriend, and wear a mask and don’t go out of your house, and shutdown your business and bankrupt every business in the country.
Last year, there were 1.6 million people in the world who died from tuberculosis. We have 1.6 million people die every year from tuberculosis. We’re not wearing masks. We’re not on lockdown. What’s the difference between tuberculosis and coronavirus? Tuberculosis has a vaccine, and the vaccine costs about $3 and that’s why we’re not on lockdown because nobody is making $39 a vaccine, or $300 a vaccine, the way that Moderna, and AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson are making from this catastrophe, and that is the only reason that I can think of. And I’m happy if somebody tells me there’s another reason, but let’s hear it. Don’t just shut me up. Don’t just tell me that I can’t debate. Here’s what we need to do. We need to do exactly what you’re doing today. We need to come out on the street and we need to stick together.
They want everybody polarized
What the Big Tech villains and scoundrels, and Mark Zuckerberg, and Jeffrey Bezos, and Bill Gates, and Toni Fauci want you to do is they want us fighting with each other, they want blacks fighting against whites, they want republicans fighting against democrats, they want everybody polarized, they want everybody fragmented, cause they know if we all get together, we’re going to start questions, and those are questions that they can’t answer, “why are you getting rich?” And “Why are we all getting poor?” And “What’s the difference between tuberculosis and coronvirus?” And “Why are we not wearing masks for tuberculosis but we are for the coronavirus?” And “Where did it all come from?” And all of those questions that we deserve an answer to that we’re not getting answers, we need to stick together.
If you’re a republican or a democrat, stop talking about that. Stop identifying yourself. The enemy is Big Tech, Big Data, Big Oil, Big Pharma, the medical cartel, the government totalitarian elements that are trying to oppress us, that are trying to rob us from our liberties, of our democracy, of our freedom of thought, of our freedom of expression, of our freedom of assembly, and all of the freedoms that give dignity to humanity. And the last thing that all of us need to do is we need to stay educated and informed.
One of the things that I want to announce to you today is that Children’s Health Defense, my organization with the help of many of you who are in these crowds, is launching a journal, a daily journal, and we are going to weaponize information for you, we’re going to tell you what the newest science is.
We’re going to be the enemies of censorship
We’re going to take all the information that is censored everywhere else and we’re going to reprint it in our publication, and you can get that everyday, so, if you see something that is censored, we want to hear about it because we want to put it up.
We are going to be the enemies of censorship. We are going to be the refuge, and we’re going to allow debate. We’re going to make sure it’s civil debate. We’re going to encourage people to be non-partisan. But we’re going to allow people to comment and have different opinions than us, we are not scared of debate, the way pharmaceutical companies and Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg, and Jeffrey Bezos, and Toni Fauci, are terrified of debate. We welcome debate, we want to hear if we’ve got a different opinion than me, I want to hear about it, and I want to see your science. And I want the public to hear us talking about it and debating about it because the free-flow of information, the cauldron of debate is the only thing that allows governments to develop rational policies in which self-governance will actually work and triumph.
You are on the front lines of the most important battle in history and it is the battle to save democracy and freedom and human liberty and human dignity from this totalitarian cartel that is trying to rob us simultaneously in every nation in the world of the rights that every human being is born with .
So thank you for your courage, thank you for your commitment, so thank you for your brotherhood, and I can pledge to you, I will go down dying with my boots on, fighting side-by-side with all of you to make sure that we return these rights and preserve them from our children.
And I will see all of you on the barricades, thank you.
************
Source
Featured image is a screenshot from the video


thelibertybeacon--2020-10-27--Principles of Benign Governance, Part Four

Continuing the search for the basic principles and guiding agreements for a government designed and run for all the people .
There are two fundamental concepts of government .
Summarised very briefly , they are : ( A ) The notion that the people should serve their government .
This idea is ancient and has been the prevailing notion for millennia .
It is a think that pervades the political elite to this day .
( B ) The notion that a government should serve the people .
This is a relatively new idea .
It has gained traction and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for a while .
It is herewith and henceforth established as an inviolable principle and both agreed upon and demanded by we , The People , that the government ’ s role and function is to serve the people .
By “ serve the people ” is meant to assist and help them live better , happier , more tolerable lives and to remove from the environment all factors and influences that bar or inhibit the living of better , happier and more tolerable lives .
Government is henceforth considered to be an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to provide practical administration so as to organise and coordinate their efforts to live better , happier and more tolerable lives .
Any and all laws , edicts , enactments and orders of any kind that violate this principle are unlawful and invalid .
The above article is from UK Reloaded The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

by Fabian Ubiquitus
Continuing the search for the basic principles and guiding agreements for a government designed and run for all the people.
OBSERVATION
There are two fundamental concepts of government. Summarised very briefly, they are:
(A) The notion that the people should serve their government. This idea is ancient and has been the prevailing notion for millennia. It is a think that pervades the political elite to this day.
(B) The notion that a government should serve the people. This is a relatively new idea. It has gained traction and been at war with the first notion for a while.
PRINCIPLE
Notion (A) is cancelled.
It is herewith and henceforth established as an inviolable principle and both agreed upon and demanded by we, The People, that the government’s role and function is to serve the people. By “serve the people” is meant to assist and help them live better, happier, more tolerable lives and to remove from the environment all factors and influences that bar or inhibit the living of better, happier and more tolerable lives.
Government is henceforth considered to be an organisational entity set up by the people to provide practical administration so as to organise and coordinate their efforts to live better, happier and more tolerable lives.
Any and all laws, edicts, enactments and orders of any kind that violate this principle are unlawful and invalid.
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.