thelibertybeacon--2020-12-24--Why Democrats Should Read the Navarro Report

Why Democrats Should Read the Navarro Report Americans increasingly live in two parallel universes , and this is a shame .
One side takes it as Gospel that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris won an overwhelming victory on November 3 and will take the oath of office on January 20 .
Another half of the population – according to a recent Rasmussen poll – believes that Donald Trump won the highest number of votes in history for the re-election of a sitting president and was cheated out of victory by overwhelming and widespread election shenanigans .
An earlier poll found @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it was likely or somewhat likely that the election was “ stolen from Trump.
” As former U.S. Senate Patrick Moynihan used to say before the era of Big Tech , you ’ re entitled to your own opinion , but not your own set of facts .
The report White House advisor Peter Navarro recently compiled as a private citizen should be required reading for Democrats who insist there is “ no evidence ” of widespread voter fraud .
The Big Tech bosses who plaster disclaimers over the president ’ s tweets @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should Never-Trumpers and members of Congress , who undoubtedly will be called to adjudicate between dueling slates of electors on January 6 .
Navarro looks at the six swing states whose results the Trump campaign has been contesting , and lays out a grid of election irregularities that swung all of those states to the Biden-Harris ticket in the days following the November 3rd election .
“ These six dimensions include outright voter fraud , ballot mishandling , contestable process fouls , Equal Protection Clause violations , voting machine irregularities , and significant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He doesn ’ t engage in conspiracy theories , or impute malign intent or foreign domination of voting machine companies .
While those may be true , it will take a criminal investigation that could last years to prove them .
In the real world , you don ’ t often get to see the man behind the curtain , the Wizard of Oz of election fraud and voting machine manipulation .
It ’ s only in fiction that the mastermind has a name , a face , and a plot that rivets @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thrills in fiction becomes horror in the real world .
Half of the country is still reeling in shock as they watch the Democrat National Committee and their communications directorate in the national media continue to gaslight us .
We can ’ t believe this is actually happening .
We can ’ t believe that in the real world – not some thriller – our democracy can be stolen right in front of our eyes .
For the nature of the evidence Navarro sets out – the evidence the Democrats and the media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ glaringly obvious .
As my father used to say , if it had been a bear it would have bitten you .
For example , hundreds of thousands of ineligible voters cast ballots that were counted in all six of the swing states – enough right there to tip the results in Georgia , Arizona , and Nevada to Donald Trump , putting him at 267 electoral votes .
Navarro explains precisely what he means by “ ineligible ” voters .
This is election fraud at the retail level .
Voting illegally , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ states , is a felony .
These allegations are easy to verify – but so far , no court has allowed the Trump team to provide the lists of voters Navarro cites .
And states controlled by Democrats have systematically refused any outside examination of their voter rolls and screamed “ voter suppression ” whenever groups such as Judicial Watch have forced them to hand over the evidence in the courts .
Then you have the cemetery vote – at least 8,000 of them in Pennsylvania , and probably more in Philadelphia , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ghost ” voters who were added to the voter rolls on Election Day by poll workers .
In Michigan , for example , thousands of people who showed up without ID were assigned birth dates in 1900 and allowed to vote .
This is fraud organized and carried out by others .
In addition , Navarro describes multiple cases of wholesale fraud , especially in Wisconsin and Michigan , where election workers were caught on camera or by multiple eyewitnesses who submitted sworn affidavits running batches of ballots repeatedly through tabulating machines .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ ballot stuffing ” are present across all six battleground states , ” Navarro notes .
Ballot mishandling was a “ multifaceted problem across the battleground states , ” he adds .
It included poll-workers instructed not to check voter ID in states requiring ID at the polls , a failure to match signatures on mail-in ballots to those in the poll books , ballots accepted without postmarks , ballots arriving at counting stations in already opened envelopes , and large numbers of ballots – in some cases , truckloads – circulating without @ @ @ @ @ @ @ court has allowed the Trump legal team to present this evidence .
I ’ m not sure which type of fraud is the more shocking : the brazen willingness of hundreds of thousands of individuals to break the law , the utter contempt of election officials who stuffed the ballot boxes and instructed co-workers how to steal votes with no fear of getting caught , or the Democrat party operatives who organized illegal ballot boxes , such as the “ Democracy in the Park ” events in Wisconsin .
Finally , zoom out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and wholesale election irregularities in the statistical context of 2020 versus earlier elections .
The failure to check ballot signatures alone would have turned the tide of this election , Navarro argues .
In 2016 , the overall voter turnout rate nationwide was 59.2 % of the voting eligible population , according to Michael P. McDonald of the non-partisan United States Elections Project .
But in 2020 , the national turnout rate skyrocketed to 66.7 % , while the U.S. population grew by less than 2.8 % .
Navarro points to sworn testimony @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Russ Ramsland , showing that 46 of 47 precincts in Wayne County , Michigan “ displayed greater than a 96 % voter turnout [ while ] 25 of those precincts showed a 100 % voter turnout.
” Similar apparent overvoting occurred in Milwaukee and other key Democrat strongholds .
“ This was theft by a thousand cuts across six dimensions and six battleground states rather than any one single “ silver bullet ” election irregularity , ” Navarro concludes .
Or as the lead hacker in my fictional account , The Election Heist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ a hail of silver bullets .
A Gatling gun of silver bullets .
A nuclear war of silver bullets.
” But , of course , it never happened .
It was just a bad dream and we ’ re about to wake up .
Right ?

Why Democrats Should Read the Navarro Report
By: Kenneth R. Timmerman
Americans increasingly live in two parallel universes, and this is a shame.
One side takes it as Gospel that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris won an overwhelming victory on November 3 and will take the oath of office on January 20.
Another half of the population – according to a recent Rasmussen poll – believes that Donald Trump won the highest number of votes in history for the re-election of a sitting president and was cheated out of victory by overwhelming and widespread election shenanigans. An earlier poll found that even 30% of Democrats said it was likely or somewhat likely that the election was “stolen from Trump.”
As former U.S. Senate Patrick Moynihan used to say before the era of Big Tech, you’re entitled to your own opinion, but not your own set of facts.
The report White House advisor Peter Navarro recently compiled as a private citizen should be required reading for Democrats who insist there is “no evidence” of widespread voter fraud. The Big Tech bosses who plaster disclaimers over the president’s tweets should read it, too.
So should Never-Trumpers and members of Congress, who undoubtedly will be called to adjudicate between dueling slates of electors on January 6.
Navarro looks at the six swing states whose results the Trump campaign has been contesting, and lays out a grid of election irregularities that swung all of those states to the Biden-Harris ticket in the days following the November 3rd election. “These six dimensions include outright voter fraud, ballot mishandling, contestable process fouls, Equal Protection Clause violations, voting machine irregularities, and significant statistical anomalies,” he writes.
He doesn’t engage in conspiracy theories, or impute malign intent or foreign domination of voting machine companies. While those may be true, it will take a criminal investigation that could last years to prove them.
In the real world, you don’t often get to see the man behind the curtain, the Wizard of Oz of election fraud and voting machine manipulation. It’s only in fiction that the mastermind has a name, a face, and a plot that rivets you to your chair.
But what thrills in fiction becomes horror in the real world. Half of the country is still reeling in shock as they watch the Democrat National Committee and their communications directorate in the national media continue to gaslight us.
We can’t believe this is actually happening. We can’t believe that in the real world – not some thriller – our democracy can be stolen right in front of our eyes.
For the nature of the evidence Navarro sets out – the evidence the Democrats and the media screams doesn’t exist – is glaringly obvious. As my father used to say, if it had been a bear it would have bitten you.
For example, hundreds of thousands of ineligible voters cast ballots that were counted in all six of the swing states – enough right there to tip the results in Georgia, Arizona, and Nevada to Donald Trump, putting him at 267 electoral votes.
Navarro explains precisely what he means by “ineligible” voters.
“Ineligible voters include felons deemed ineligible, underage citizens, nonregistered voters, illegal aliens, illegal out-of-state voters, and voters illegally using a post office box as an address. “In a court filing by the Trump campaign legal team, lead counsel Ray Smith provided a list of more than 70,000 allegedly ineligible voters casting ballots in Georgia in the 2020 election. Also in Georgia, over 20,000 people appear to have filed a Notice of Changed Address form to the Georgia state government or had other indications of moving out of state. Yet, these clearly ineligible out- of-state voters appeared to have remained on the voter rolls and voted in the 2020 election.”
This is election fraud at the retail level. Voting illegally, or voting twice, or in multiple states, is a felony. These allegations are easy to verify – but so far, no court has allowed the Trump team to provide the lists of voters Navarro cites. And states controlled by Democrats have systematically refused any outside examination of their voter rolls and screamed “voter suppression” whenever groups such as Judicial Watch have forced them to hand over the evidence in the courts.
Then you have the cemetery vote – at least 8,000 of them in Pennsylvania, and probably more in Philadelphia, Milwaukee, and Detroit – and “ghost” voters who were added to the voter rolls on Election Day by poll workers. In Michigan, for example, thousands of people who showed up without ID were assigned birth dates in 1900 and allowed to vote. This is fraud organized and carried out by others.
In addition, Navarro describes multiple cases of wholesale fraud, especially in Wisconsin and Michigan, where election workers were caught on camera or by multiple eyewitnesses who submitted sworn affidavits running batches of ballots repeatedly through tabulating machines. “Evidence of these particular kinds of “ballot stuffing” are present across all six battleground states,” Navarro notes.
Ballot mishandling was a “multifaceted problem across the battleground states,” he adds. It included poll-workers instructed not to check voter ID in states requiring ID at the polls, a failure to match signatures on mail-in ballots to those in the poll books, ballots accepted without postmarks, ballots arriving at counting stations in already opened envelopes, and large numbers of ballots – in some cases, truckloads – circulating without apparent supervision.
But again: no court has allowed the Trump legal team to present this evidence.
I’m not sure which type of fraud is the more shocking: the brazen willingness of hundreds of thousands of individuals to break the law, the utter contempt of election officials who stuffed the ballot boxes and instructed co-workers how to steal votes with no fear of getting caught, or the Democrat party operatives who organized illegal ballot boxes, such as the “Democracy in the Park” events in Wisconsin.
Finally, zoom out and place the documented examples of retail and wholesale election irregularities in the statistical context of 2020 versus earlier elections.
The failure to check ballot signatures alone would have turned the tide of this election, Navarro argues.
“For example, in Nevada, the overall [signature] rejection rate dropped from 1.6% in 2016 to 0.58% in 2020. In Pennsylvania, the 2016 rejection rate of 1.0% dropped to virtually nothing at 0.28%. The biggest fall in the overall absentee ballot rejection rate came, however, in Georgia. Its rejection rate fell from 6.8% in 2016 to a mere 0.34% in 2020.”
In 2016, the overall voter turnout rate nationwide was 59.2% of the voting eligible population, according to Michael P. McDonald of the non-partisan United States Elections Project. But in 2020, the national turnout rate skyrocketed to 66.7%, while the U.S. population grew by less than 2.8%. Navarro points to sworn testimony from former NASA and MIT data analyst Russ Ramsland, showing that 46 of 47 precincts in Wayne County, Michigan “displayed greater than a 96% voter turnout [while] 25 of those precincts showed a 100% voter turnout.”
Similar apparent overvoting occurred in Milwaukee and other key Democrat strongholds.
“This was theft by a thousand cuts across six dimensions and six battleground states rather than any one single “silver bullet” election irregularity,” Navarro concludes.
Or as the lead hacker in my fictional account, The Election Heist, explained, the Democrats had planned “a hail of silver bullets. A Gatling gun of silver bullets. A nuclear war of silver bullets.”
But, of course, it never happened. It was just a bad dream and we’re about to wake up. Right?
••••
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-24--2021’s Deficit Spending Is Already Out of Control & Why It’s a Problem

2021 ’ s Deficit Spending Is Already Out of Control .
Here ’ s Why That ’ s a Problem .
This morning , President Trump apparently threatened to veto the so-called stimulus legislation recently approved by Congress .
The legislation features approximately $ 908 billion worth of spending including $ 600 stimulus checks for many millions of Americans who qualify .
The stimulus spending is part of a much larger spending package which totals $ 2.3 trillion and is a general supplemental appropriations bill .
But these numbers by no means reflect what will surely be a much , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take place before this fiscal year ends on September 30 .
Indeed , even as we were entering just the third month of the fiscal year in early December , it was already clear that spending in 2021 was likely to be another year of both runaway spending and runaway deficits .
The sheer size and scope of the new spending package , which includes every type of pork imaginable—from propping up foreign dictators to subsidizing huge American corporations—is simply a reflection of the fact that all bets are off nowadays when it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of his swearing in , it was already abundantly clear that Trump had no interest at all in cutting spending or scaling back the mountains of debt the US was quickly amassing .
And now the Covid Panic has accelerated the process all the more .
Just How Much Has Spending Accelerated ?
During the 2020 fiscal year , the total budget deficit reached more than $ 3.1 trillion .
Even if we adjust for inflation , 2020 ’ s total deficit was essentially off-the-charts as far as deficits go : In 2009 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ financial crisis , the deficit reached 1.6 trillion in 2019 dollars .
But the deficit nearly doubled that previous high in 2020 .
And now , 2021 , isn ’ t looking to be much more frugal than 2020 .
Even before any new stimulus bill have been signed , 2021 ’ s year-to-date deficit already tops 2010 ’ s previous high for the period .
Combining October and November ( the first two months of this fiscal year ) the deficit is at $ 429 billion .
At the very least , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trillion .
But , those who take a sanguine view of deficits and the national debt are likely to ask : so what ?
Well , there several problems that come with these deficits , that are occurring right now .
The danger of enormous deficits doesn ’ t just come in the form of an economic collapse , possibly in the far distant future .
First of all , it is important to point out that it is very unlikely this level of deficit spending could be maintained without a lot of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the federal government engages in deficit spending and floods the market with new debt , it needs the central bank to mop a lot of it up so that interest rates don ’ t rise .
After all , the US government is already on its way to spending half a trillion dollars per year on interest alone .
And that ’ s all while paying interest rates of well under two percent .
Were these interest rates to rise to more historically normal levels , the federal government would have to slash @ @ @ @ @ @ @ debt payments .
Clearly , political considerations mean politicians want to avoid this outcome as much as a possible .
Fortunately for politicians , the Fed can defer this interest-payment problem buying up more debt .
But where does the Fed get those trillions of dollars to buy up US debt ?
The Fed prints it .
This could lead to rapidly rising consumer prices , but experience over the past 20 years has instead pointed to the bigger problem being asset price inflation ( especially in real estate and stocks ) .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ part because it favors the already-wealthy at the expense of newcomers .
Asset price inflation in housing , for example , favors those who already own these assets while putting first-time homebuyers ( typically younger and less-wealthy people ) at a disadvantage .
This results in part in growing wealth inequality , and a transfer of wealth from the middle class to the wealthy .
As Fed-watcher and veteran financial analyst Karen Petrou recently noted , a mounting pile of quantitative evidence shows : continuing emphasis on price stability [ i.e.
, anti-deflation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ huge central-bank portfolios does not promote sustained growth , does not meaningfully increase low-income wages , and accelerates market price hikes that both increase wealth inequality and stoke financial crises exactly like the one in March , 2020 .
Where does this lead beyond the short term ?
One likely outcome is the “ Japanization ” of the US economy , “ a long-lasting economic stagnation accompanied by expansionary monetary and fiscal policies.
” Contrary to what central bankers repeatedly insist , it is not the case that loose monetary policy can drive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The case of Japan shows the opposite , even after decades of highly accommodative monetary policy .
This occurs because expansive monetary policy creates bubbles that pull wealth away from the most productive economic activities , and instead redirects wealth to those industries that fare best in an environment of artificial wealth creation .
Thanks to Cantillon effects , this often means that wealth flows into the financial sectors at the expense of the “ productive ” sectors that employ more people and provide important non-financial goods and services .
While hyperinflation is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trillions of new dollars , it ’ s not necessarily what results .
Instead , as Brendan Brown has noted , the effects might instead be a long slow process of impoverishment , similar to what we have seen in Japan , and marked by the growing trend of wealth inequality now being driven by current Fed policy .
The origins of this process of impoverishment process go back largely to deficit spending .
So long as the federal government continues to add hundreds of billions—or even trillions—of dollars per year to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be called upon to turn debt into dollars .
Long-term economic destruction follows .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

2021’s Deficit Spending Is Already Out of Control. Here’s Why That’s a Problem.
By: Ryan McMaken
This morning, President Trump apparently threatened to veto the so-called stimulus legislation recently approved by Congress. The legislation features approximately $908 billion worth of spending including $600 stimulus checks for many millions of Americans who qualify. The stimulus spending is part of a much larger spending package which totals $2.3 trillion and is a general supplemental appropriations bill.
But these numbers by no means reflect what will surely be a much, much larger amount of spending that will take place before this fiscal year ends on September 30.
Indeed, even as we were entering just the third month of the fiscal year in early December, it was already clear that spending in 2021 was likely to be another year of both runaway spending and runaway deficits.
The sheer size and scope of the new spending package, which includes every type of pork imaginable—from propping up foreign dictators to subsidizing huge American corporations—is simply a reflection of the fact that all bets are off nowadays when it comes to federal spending.
Within months of his swearing in, it was already abundantly clear that Trump had no interest at all in cutting spending or scaling back the mountains of debt the US was quickly amassing. And now the Covid Panic has accelerated the process all the more.
Just How Much Has Spending Accelerated?
During the 2020 fiscal year, the total budget deficit reached more than $3.1 trillion. Even if we adjust for inflation, 2020’s total deficit was essentially off-the-charts as far as deficits go:
def1.png In 2009, in the wake of the 2009 financial crisis, the deficit reached 1.6 trillion in 2019 dollars. But the deficit nearly doubled that previous high in 2020. And now, 2021, isn’t looking to be much more frugal than 2020. Even before any new stimulus bill have been signed, 2021’s year-to-date deficit already tops 2010’s previous high for the period. Combining October and November (the first two months of this fiscal year) the deficit is at $429 billion. At the very least, 2021 is likely to top $2 trillion. def2.png But, those who take a sanguine view of deficits and the national debt are likely to ask: so what? Do Deficits Matter? Well, there several problems that come with these deficits, that are occurring right now. The danger of enormous deficits doesn’t just come in the form of an economic collapse, possibly in the far distant future. First of all, it is important to point out that it is very unlikely this level of deficit spending could be maintained without a lot of monetization from the central bank. As the federal government engages in deficit spending and floods the market with new debt, it needs the central bank to mop a lot of it up so that interest rates don’t rise. After all, the US government is already on its way to spending half a trillion dollars per year on interest alone. And that’s all while paying interest rates of well under two percent. Were these interest rates to rise to more historically normal levels, the federal government would have to slash federal programs to cover the rise in debt payments. Clearly, political considerations mean politicians want to avoid this outcome as much as a possible. Fortunately for politicians, the Fed can defer this interest-payment problem buying up more debt. But where does the Fed get those trillions of dollars to buy up US debt? The Fed prints it. This could lead to rapidly rising consumer prices, but experience over the past 20 years has instead pointed to the bigger problem being asset price inflation (especially in real estate and stocks). Asset price inflation is a problem in part because it favors the already-wealthy at the expense of newcomers. Asset price inflation in housing, for example, favors those who already own these assets while putting first-time homebuyers (typically younger and less-wealthy people) at a disadvantage. This results in part in growing wealth inequality, and a transfer of wealth from the middle class to the wealthy. As Fed-watcher and veteran financial analyst Karen Petrou recently noted, a mounting pile of quantitative evidence shows: continuing emphasis on price stability [i.e., anti-deflation measures], ultra-low rates, and huge central-bank portfolios does not promote sustained growth, does not meaningfully increase low-income wages, and accelerates market price hikes that both increase wealth inequality and stoke financial crises exactly like the one in March, 2020. Where does this lead beyond the short term? One likely outcome is the “Japanization” of the US economy, “a long-lasting economic stagnation accompanied by expansionary monetary and fiscal policies.” Contrary to what central bankers repeatedly insist, it is not the case that loose monetary policy can drive up wages or increase general prosperity. The case of Japan shows the opposite, even after decades of highly accommodative monetary policy. This occurs because expansive monetary policy creates bubbles that pull wealth away from the most productive economic activities, and instead redirects wealth to those industries that fare best in an environment of artificial wealth creation. Thanks to Cantillon effects, this often means that wealth flows into the financial sectors at the expense of the “productive” sectors that employ more people and provide important non-financial goods and services. While hyperinflation is always a possible result of printing up trillions of new dollars, it’s not necessarily what results. Instead, as Brendan Brown has noted, the effects might instead be a long slow process of impoverishment, similar to what we have seen in Japan, and marked by the growing trend of wealth inequality now being driven by current Fed policy. The origins of this process of impoverishment process go back largely to deficit spending. So long as the federal government continues to add hundreds of billions—or even trillions—of dollars per year to the national debt, central banks will continue to be called upon to turn debt into dollars. Long-term economic destruction follows.
••••
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-24--Your Search History Will Determine Your Financial Credit Score In Future, Says IMF

Fintech resolves the dilemma by tapping various nonfinancial data : the type of browser and hardware used to access the @ @ @ @ @ online searches and purchases .
Recent research documents that , once powered by artificial intelligence @ @ @ @ @ alternative data sources are often superior than traditional credit assessment methods , and can advance @ @ @ @ @ while much of the technological progress in finance is evolutionary , its pace is accelerating @ @ @ @ @ potential to reach out to over a billion unbanked people around the world , and @ @ @ @ @ system structure that this can induce , can be revolutionary .
Governments should follow and @ @ @ @ @ in finance .
It is important to adjust policies accordingly and stay ahead of the @ @

Your Search History Will Determine Your Financial Credit Score In Future, Says IMF
A new white paper by the IMF calls for linking your search history to your financial credit score, which would in effect lower your score if you visit websites marked harmful by their fact-checkers. GREATGAMEINDIA In a new blog post for the International Monetary Fund, four researchers presented their findings from a working paper (read below) that examines the current relationship between finance and tech as well as its potential future. The researchers propose using the data from your browsing, search, and purchase history to create a mechanism for determining the credit rating of an individual or business. The plan is outlined in a blog written by Arnoud Boot, Peter Hoffmann, Luc Laeven and Lev Ratnovski, pitching the Orwellian notion as a breakthrough in financial technology (Fintech). Fintech resolves the dilemma by tapping various nonfinancial data: the type of browser and hardware used to access the internet, the history of online searches and purchases. Recent research documents that, once powered by artificial intelligence and machine learning, these alternative data sources are often superior than traditional credit assessment methods, and can advance financial inclusion. Overall, while much of the technological progress in finance is evolutionary, its pace is accelerating fast. Fintech’s potential to reach out to over a billion unbanked people around the world, and the changes in the financial system structure that this can induce, can be revolutionary. Governments should follow and carefully support the technological transition in finance. It is important to adjust policies accordingly and stay ahead of the curve. Gizmodo commented on the proposal and its mortifying consequences if it were actually implemented on a grand scale. The researchers acknowledge that there will be privacy and policy concerns related to incorporating this kind of soft-data into credit analysis. And they do little to explain how this might work in practice. The paper isn’t long, and it’s worth a read just to wrap your mind around some of the notions of fintech’s future and why everyone seems to want in on the payments game. As it is, getting the really fine soft-data points would probably require companies like Facebook and Apple to loosen up their standards on linking unencrypted information with individual accounts. How they might share information with other institutions would be its own can of worms. However, the policy seems to be designed to bring an end to alternate news media with grave consequences for those engaged with the organisation. ************ Source Send in your tips and submissions by filling out this form or write to us directly at the email provided. Join us on WhatsApp for more intel and updates. Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-24--Researchers Warn Certain COVID-19 Vaccines May Cause HIV Infection

The researchers stressed the need to understand the role Ad5 might play in increasing the risks of HIV in vulnerable populations before developing and deploying vaccines using the vector , adding that informed consent documents should reflect the “ considerable literature ” on the risk of HIV acquisition with Ad5 vectors .
As GreatGameIndia reported , recently Australia scrapped a billion dollar coronavirus vaccine agreement after several trial participants tested HIV positive .
Even Australian vaccine scientist Nikolai Petrovsky had warned the government about the risk of including HIV in a vaccine months before the $ 1billion deal was signed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ February a group of Indian scientists discovered that Coronavirus was engineered with AIDS like insertions .
The study concluded that it was unlikely for a virus to have acquired such unique insertions naturally in a short duration of time .
Although the study was retracted after it attracted heavy criticism from experts on social media , Luc Montagnier , the Nobel Prize winning French virologist himself confirmed the conclusions of the study .
The study concluded that it is because of these 4 new AIDS like insertions in Coronavirus that the virus jumped @ @ @ @ @ @ @ infect animals .
The study gives credence to GreatGameIndia ‘ s earlier reports on how Coronavirus was engineered in a lab and weaponized .
It has now been revealed through emails obtained via public records requests that the “ natural origin of Coronavirus ” was an orchestrated myth .
Emails obtained by U.S .
Right to Know show that a statement in The Lancet authored by 27 prominent public health scientists condemning “ conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin ” was organized by employees of EcoHealth Alliance , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of dollars of U.S. taxpayer funding to genetically manipulate coronaviruses with scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology .
The emails show that EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak drafted The Lancet statement , and that he intended it to “ not be identifiable as coming from any one organization or person ” but rather to be seen as “ simply a letter from leading scientists ” .
Daszak wrote that he wanted “ to avoid the appearance of a political statement ” .
Meanwhile , China has started using AIDS drugs for Coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s HIV drugs as an ad-hoc treatment for pneumonia caused by the novel coronavirus while the global search for a cure continues .
For latest updates on the outbreak check out our Coronavirus Coverage .
Send in your tips and submissions by filling out this form or write to us directly at the email provided .
Join us on WhatsApp for more intel and updates .
GreatGameIndia is a journal on Geopolitics and International Relations .
Get to know the Geopolitical threats India is facing in our exclusive book India in Cognitive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from EuropeReloaded.com

The researchers stressed the need to understand the role Ad5 might play in increasing the risks of HIV in vulnerable populations before developing and deploying vaccines using the vector, adding that informed consent documents should reflect the “considerable literature” on the risk of HIV acquisition with Ad5 vectors.
As GreatGameIndia reported, recently Australia scrapped a billion dollar coronavirus vaccine agreement after several trial participants tested HIV positive.
Even Australian vaccine scientist Nikolai Petrovsky had warned the government about the risk of including HIV in a vaccine months before the $1billion deal was signed.
As GreatGameIndia reported earlier, in February a group of Indian scientists discovered that Coronavirus was engineered with AIDS like insertions. The study concluded that it was unlikely for a virus to have acquired such unique insertions naturally in a short duration of time.
Although the study was retracted after it attracted heavy criticism from experts on social media, Luc Montagnier, the Nobel Prize winning French virologist himself confirmed the conclusions of the study.
The study concluded that it is because of these 4 new AIDS like insertions in Coronavirus that the virus jumped to humans, originally known only to infect animals.
These proteins are critical for the viruses to identify and latch on to their host cells and for viral assembly. Since surface proteins are responsible for host tropism, changes in these proteins imply a change in host specificity of the virus. According to reports from China, there has been a gain of host specificity in case 2019-nCoV as the virus was originally known to infect animals and not humans but after the mutations, it has gained tropism to humans as well.
The study gives credence to GreatGameIndia‘s earlier reports on how Coronavirus was engineered in a lab and weaponized. It has now been revealed through emails obtained via public records requests that the “natural origin of Coronavirus” was an orchestrated myth.
Emails obtained by U.S. Right to Know show that a statement in The Lancet authored by 27 prominent public health scientists condemning “conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin” was organized by employees of EcoHealth Alliance, a non-profit group that has received millions of dollars of U.S. taxpayer funding to genetically manipulate coronaviruses with scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
The emails show that EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak drafted The Lancet statement, and that he intended it to “not be identifiable as coming from any one organization or person” but rather to be seen as “simply a letter from leading scientists”. Daszak wrote that he wanted “to avoid the appearance of a political statement”.
Meanwhile, China has started using AIDS drugs for Coronavirus treatment. China is using AbbVie Inc’s HIV drugs as an ad-hoc treatment for pneumonia caused by the novel coronavirus while the global search for a cure continues.
************
For latest updates on the outbreak check out our Coronavirus Coverage.
Send in your tips and submissions by filling out this form or write to us directly at the email provided. Join us on WhatsApp for more intel and updates.
GreatGameIndia is a journal on Geopolitics and International Relations. Get to know the Geopolitical threats India is facing in our exclusive book India in Cognitive Dissonance.
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-24--The View from the Resistance

The View from the Resistance

The government has suddenly claimed that there is a 70 % more contagious mutation of the COVID19 virus .
The claim thus far lacks a vital element : evidence .
MPs , numerous scientists and the general public have called upon the government to back up its claim with some hard evidence .
Thus far , no experimental data , lab test results and so forth that prove the virus has mutated are forthcoming .
The government instead has put forward conjecture , suspicions and concerns that something might be happening as the justification of its latest attack upon the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the puerile shambles that passes at this time for statesmanship or sound governance have pointed out several things among which are : * given the severity of the measures justified by alarming government press releases and the damage they will do to a country already reeling form previous damages inflicted on it , some actual evidence would be a good idea .
Boris Jonson ’ s or Matt Hancock ’ s opinions do not cut it .
* the hope for actual reliable and honest evidence is perhaps a forlorn one because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ crisis ” we have not yet had any .
It is now established irrefutably that the mortality statistics were rigged ( ie false ) , the PCR test is fraudulent and the infections/cases statistics consequently false .
* it is not unusual for a virus of the coronavirus family to which the COVID19 virus belongs to mutate .
Similar but slightly more deadly viruses such as flu and “ common cold ” viruses do it all the time .
Each time such a virus mutates , the vaccine just developed for it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ effective vaccine has yet been invented for the coronaviruses .
* we expect the gov to handle this blunder with the “ surprising discovery ” that the COVID19 mutation is “ unusual ” in that it does not follow the normal pattern and by a tremendous stroke of luck the dodgy vaccines already developed for it can still be used to ” fight ” the new virus ( albeit we are not sure what that means as the manufacturers can not claim their vaccines will actually render you immune to the virus although @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , unless it doesn ’ t ) .
The latest economic attack , based as it is on conjecture rather than hard evidence , was timed to cause maximum distress and damage over Christmas .
Aspects of that damage include but are not limited to : * disruption of trade with scores of countries that have isolated the UK due to the government ’ s assertion of a UK mutation .
Why the virus has picked on the UK is not clear .
* the potential wipe-out of thousands of businesses that depend @ @ @ @ @ @ @ annual revenue .
* wiping it out the economy paves the way for a corporate takeover of whatever is left of the ruins of British enterprise .
The plan requires inflicting on the people a high degree of hardship , misery , poverty and so forth .
Taking a series of hits , the country gets a little “ punch drunk ” and is in a somewhat suggestible state of mind in which its confidence in itself it eroded as well as being plain miserable .
This when some corporate con men come @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our troubles ” that by an incredible coincidence will also be really really really good for those very same corporate interests .
The nation will be in a receptive state of mind , having been bludgeoned into it , and perfectly willing to play the minor price of shutting the doors forever on liberty and chucking away the ruddy key .
Well , is what they are hoping for .
Whether that is what they will get will depend on how many Britons are fighters and how many are sheep .
The latest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Tier 4 ” was trundled out like a secret weapon and launched against London and the South East , was timed precisely to coincide with Parliament going into Christmas recess .
Thus Parliament was unable to debate the new measures , a legal requirement with the new measures legally unenforceable until that is done .
Why the gov sought to avoid Parliament is unclear as it has thus far had Parliament under its thumb , rubber-stamping its edicts as if our governance is now a constitutional democracy in the way that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the trapping and rituals of a monarchy but not actual power ) .
We surmise that this in effect places not just the government in breach of the law but also any institutions or agencies or the officers and agents thereof who attempt to enforce the illegal measures , also in breach of the law .
The event marks further evidence of a coup in which Democracy had been all but dissolved and the country is now being governed by edicts given out by Ministers in press briefings and forwarding the agenda of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now pointing out that the evidence that the country is under attack from enemies whose proxies and agents have been infiltrated into our government its ministries and advisory bodies is too strong to be ignored .
One Oxford University Professor said of the latest assertion of the existence of a mutation or “ variant ” ( whatever that means ) : “ I ’ ve been doing this job for 25 years and I can tell you can ’ t establish a quantifiable number in such a short time frame.
” Other sources @ @ @ @ @ @ @ virus has itself never been isolated ( ie located and observed as a distinct entity as opposed to a theoretical or deduced one ) .
It is difficult to argue the existence of a mutation of something whose existence has not yet been proven .
( Analogy : Jaguar cars announce the launch of the 2021 model of their 2020 “ Jaguar Vaxinator.
” The 2020 model of the Vaxinator has been talked about and praised at great length all over the media for months so that everybody is really excited about the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are even more excited about the 2o21 version , which is even better than the previous model !
Except that it turns out that nobody anywhere has atcually seen the 202 Jag Vaxinator , no photos of it exist but “ everybody knows ” it exists because everybody is talking about it !
Etcetera… .
Others also point out that the main case for the accelerated spread of the alleged virus is an acceleration of testing that in turn has produced an acceleration of “ positives ” .
Yet these positives are based @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been exposed time and again as unable to establish the existence in anyone of a live infectious COV19 virus .
What the test is actually detecting are minute traces ( often VERY minute ) of the remnants of the DNA of previous colds and flu ( coronaviruses ) the person may have been infected with and even then to detect even these miniscule remnants , sometimes the samples being tested have to be magnified in excess of a trillion time .
This use of the PCR test renders all statistics and theories based @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the “ positive ” result is then used to designate a “ COVID case ” .
In other words , when a person is tested and tests positive , they are declared to be a “ COVID cases ” .
NO OTHER CRITERIA are used to “ diagnose ” a COVID case , not symptoms , nothing .
The false positive is all that is required .
This should tell everyone – and I mean everyone – that what is being run here is a complete and massive fraud of which the “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Yet subversive factions installed at Suppression Central launched their attack on London and the South East of the UK by plunging it into a fresh lockdown over the weekend .
The economic fallout from this latest offensive against the nation looks set to be considerable as scores of countries have all responded to the UK government ’ s latest psychotic episode by banning travel to and from the UK .
Scientists are demanding to see any evidence that there is a 70 % more contagious mutant strain of COVID , having not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ A handful of MPs have also squeaked up in evidence that the corpse of Parliamentary democracy is at least still twitching .
All there has been thus far from the government has been some talk of “ concern ” and “ fears ” that this might be the case and the inference that the gov has “ taken advice ” from ” scientists ” but no specifics as to what advice , what it is based on exactly and from whom .
The Daily Mail reports that Carl Heneghan , Professor of Evidence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Nuffield Department of Primary Care , has expressed scepticism over the 70 per cent figure : “ I ’ ve been doing this job for 25 years and I can tell you can ’ t establish a quantifiable number in such a short time frame .
.
.
Every expert is saying it ’ s too early to draw such an inference .
.
.
I would want to have very clear evidence rather than ‘ we think it ’ s more transmissible ’ so we can see if it is or not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , it ’ s causing fear and panic , but we should not be in this situation when the Government is putting out data that is unquantifiable.
” According to the government , the ‘ mutant strain ’ has been circulating since September and Prime Minister Boris Johnson is using it to justify literally cancelling Christmas , his new edict carefully timed to come just after Parliament has gone into recess .
The data the government alleges it has on the ‘ new strain ’ of COVID comes from “ analysis ” by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t laugh ) The New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group ( Nervtag ) .
One member of this group of “ experts ” is one Professor Neil Ferguson , world famous for his flawed mathematical models and catastrophically wrong predictions .
This tells you all you need to know about the reliability of Nervtag .
As one observer told this reporter , “ It utterly beggars belief .
That our country is in the hands of such buffoons is a hundred times more terrifying than this flu virus .
No one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Prime Minster noting it is “ early data , “ subject to review ” but “ It ’ s the best we have at the moment.
” In other words the destruction of the country has been accelerated on the basis of an unverified opinion or assertion .
Announcing the previously non-existent ‘ Tier Four ’ restriction level , Johnson added in the puerile manner we have cone to expect from this charlatan , that it was happening because of a “ change in the science ” .
A what ?
God @ @ @ @ @ @ @ running the country ?
Millions of British citizens , fed up with hearing assertions that the gov is “ following the science ” instead of a blatant political agenda , are asking : “ What science specifically ?
And how can you change something that has not thus far existed ?
” The response by MPS both Tory and the Labour Fake Opposition , has on the whole been marked by the apathy or outright collusion with which Parliament has submitted to the Johnson/Hancock coup .
Yet there has been a faint spark @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conservative MPs calling for all the scientific evidence the government has to be made public .
Presumably written on the back of a postage stamp will suffice .
We are confident that in time the government will be able to produce enough spin , junk science and flannel to satisfy all but those very few MPs who truly give a rat ’ s ass about the well being of their country .
Former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith accused the government of being ‘ bounced by the science ’ , noting that Chief @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Scientific Adviser Sir Patrick Vallance are ‘ stepping back into the shadows when it suits them ’ .
This , as far as “ being rebellious ” is concerned is pretty feeble and as for fighting for your country is right up there with tutting at Genghis Khan as he sweeps down from the Steppes to pillage everything in sight .
In the theatre or TV game show known as “ Parliament ” , we guess it creates a wafer thin pretence that there are still MPs who really give a crap but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sir Desmond Swayne who stands out among the invertebrates as someone with the semblance of a spine , said , “ The arrangements for Christmas were explicitly voted on by Parliament .
If they ’ re to be changed then in my view , Parliament should vote again .
.
.
.
Parliament voted explicitly for a certain set of arrangements , it seems to be perfectly proper therefore that Parliament should be consulted when those are changed , irrespective of the Government acting in an emergency , nevertheless it ’ s perfectly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of this week to at least ratify those changes ” .
Swayne noted that MPs haven ’ t even been given any evidence to justify the heightened restrictions , and that a third of the country was effectively imprisoned via a press conference .
“ Explain to us – we are after all a democracy … ” [ don ’ t laugh dear reader , we think he meant it ] “ … explain to the elected representatives the evidence that they have and why they ’ ve reached this decision .
.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ at it since September and how convenient when Parliament went into recess on Thursday suddenly they were then able to produce this revelation .
.
.
Let ’ s see the evidence then , let ’ s have Parliament back and show us and convince us , come clean .
.
.
I want Parliament to be recalled so we can scrutinise properly in a democracy decisions that are being made which affect our economy radically and our liberty.
” His words raise a question of how come , if this mutation has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ PM is asserting that this is “ early data , “ subject to review ” and “ It ’ s the best we have at the moment.
” More lies ?
Plus , if it was known about earlier how come other countries knew nothing about it ?
If it had been true , they would have been told , surely , and taken action back then to shut their borders .
And here we have yet more about this fiasco that makes no ruddy sense .
Parliament itself may of course be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” heroically returning from their Christmas Hols to “ debate ” the issue , then rubber-stamp it as they had always planned to do but the big show of a “ democratic ” debate gives the subversive faction some bogus legitimacy .
We can hear the cries now , “ Look , see !
We debated it – carefully avoided any mention of the PCR test on which the whole hoax hinges being a complete fraud – and found our Wise Leader and his Cohorts had been right all along to stuff the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ democracy .
How much longer will we submit to being the patsies ?

The government has suddenly claimed that there is a 70% more contagious mutation of the COVID19 virus.
The claim thus far lacks a vital element: evidence. MPs, numerous scientists and the general public have called upon the government to back up its claim with some hard evidence.
Thus far, no experimental data, lab test results and so forth that prove the virus has mutated are forthcoming.
The government instead has put forward conjecture, suspicions and concerns that something might be happening as the justification of its latest attack upon the well being of the country.
Critics of the puerile shambles that passes at this time for statesmanship or sound governance have pointed out several things among which are:
* given the severity of the measures justified by alarming government press releases and the damage they will do to a country already reeling form previous damages inflicted on it, some actual evidence would be a good idea. Boris Jonson’s or Matt Hancock’s opinions do not cut it.
* the hope for actual reliable and honest evidence is perhaps a forlorn one because since the beginning of the stage-managed fake “crisis” we have not yet had any. It is now established irrefutably that the mortality statistics were rigged (ie false), the PCR test is fraudulent and the infections/cases statistics consequently false.
* it is not unusual for a virus of the coronavirus family to which the COVID19 virus belongs to mutate. Similar but slightly more deadly viruses such as flu and “common cold” viruses do it all the time. Each time such a virus mutates, the vaccine just developed for it becomes ineffective, which is why no effective vaccine has yet been invented for the coronaviruses.
* we expect the gov to handle this blunder with the “surprising discovery” that the COVID19 mutation is “unusual” in that it does not follow the normal pattern and by a tremendous stroke of luck the dodgy vaccines already developed for it can still be used to”fight” the new virus (albeit we are not sure what that means as the manufacturers cannot claim their vaccines will actually render you immune to the virus although they can promise you that it might, unless it doesn’t).
The latest economic attack, based as it is on conjecture rather than hard evidence, was timed to cause maximum distress and damage over Christmas.
Aspects of that damage include but are not limited to:
* disruption of trade with scores of countries that have isolated the UK due to the government’s assertion of a UK mutation. Why the virus has picked on the UK is not clear.
* the potential wipe-out of thousands of businesses that depend upon Christmas trade for much of their annual revenue.
* wiping it out the economy paves the way for a corporate takeover of whatever is left of the ruins of British enterprise.
The plan requires inflicting on the people a high degree of hardship, misery, poverty and so forth. Taking a series of hits, the country gets a little “punch drunk” and is in a somewhat suggestible state of mind in which its confidence in itself it eroded as well as being plain miserable.
This when some corporate con men come along with a “solution to all our troubles” that by an incredible coincidence will also be really really really good for those very same corporate interests.
The nation will be in a receptive state of mind, having been bludgeoned into it, and perfectly willing to play the minor price of shutting the doors forever on liberty and chucking away the ruddy key.
Well, is what they are hoping for.
Whether that is what they will get will depend on how many Britons are fighters and how many are sheep.
The latest attack, in which a previously unheard-of “Tier 4” was trundled out like a secret weapon and launched against London and the South East, was timed precisely to coincide with Parliament going into Christmas recess.
Thus Parliament was unable to debate the new measures, a legal requirement with the new measures legally unenforceable until that is done.
Why the gov sought to avoid Parliament is unclear as it has thus far had Parliament under its thumb, rubber-stamping its edicts as if our governance is now a constitutional democracy in the way that the Monarchy became a constitutional monarchy (all the trapping and rituals of a monarchy but not actual power).
We surmise that this in effect places not just the government in breach of the law but also any institutions or agencies or the officers and agents thereof who attempt to enforce the illegal measures, also in breach of the law.
The event marks further evidence of a coup in which Democracy had been all but dissolved and the country is now being governed by edicts given out by Ministers in press briefings and forwarding the agenda of hidden corporate interests.
Many observers are now pointing out that the evidence that the country is under attack from enemies whose proxies and agents have been infiltrated into our government its ministries and advisory bodies is too strong to be ignored.
One Oxford University Professor said of the latest assertion of the existence of a mutation or “variant” (whatever that means): “I’ve been doing this job for 25 years and I can tell you can’t establish a quantifiable number in such a short time frame.”
Other sources have pointed out that as the COVID19 virus has itself never been isolated (ie located and observed as a distinct entity as opposed to a theoretical or deduced one). It is difficult to argue the existence of a mutation of something whose existence has not yet been proven.
(Analogy: Jaguar cars announce the launch of the 2021 model of their 2020 “Jaguar Vaxinator.” The 2020 model of the Vaxinator has been talked about and praised at great length all over the media for months so that everybody is really excited about the 2020 Jag Vaxinator. And now they are even more excited about the 2o21 version, which is even better than the previous model!
Except that it turns out that nobody anywhere has atcually seen the 202 Jag Vaxinator, no photos of it exist but “everybody knows” it exists because everybody is talking about it! Etcetera….
Others also point out that the main case for the accelerated spread of the alleged virus is an acceleration of testing that in turn has produced an acceleration of “positives”.
Yet these positives are based on the PCR test, which has been exposed time and again as unable to establish the existence in anyone of a live infectious COV19 virus.
What the test is actually detecting are minute traces (often VERY minute) of the remnants of the DNA of previous colds and flu (coronaviruses) the person may have been infected with and even then to detect even these miniscule remnants, sometimes the samples being tested have to be magnified in excess of a trillion time.
This use of the PCR test renders all statistics and theories based on it fraudulent themselves.
Moreover, the “positive” result is then used to designate a “COVID case”. In other words, when a person is tested and tests positive, they are declared to be a “COVID cases”. NO OTHER CRITERIA are used to “diagnose” a COVID case, not symptoms, nothing. The false positive is all that is required.
This should tell everyone – and I mean everyone – that what is being run here is a complete and massive fraud of which the “accelerated” infections are but one aspect.
Yet subversive factions installed at Suppression Central launched their attack on London and the South East of the UK by plunging it into a fresh lockdown over the weekend.
The economic fallout from this latest offensive against the nation looks set to be considerable as scores of countries have all responded to the UK government’s latest psychotic episode by banning travel to and from the UK.
Scientists are demanding to see any evidence that there is a 70% more contagious mutant strain of COVID, having not been shown anything by the government.
A handful of MPs have also squeaked up in evidence that the corpse of Parliamentary democracy is at least still twitching.
All there has been thus far from the government has been some talk of “concern” and “fears” that this might be the case and the inference that the gov has “taken advice” from”scientists” but no specifics as to what advice, what it is based on exactly and from whom.
The Daily Mail reports that Carl Heneghan, Professor of Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford University’s Nuffield Department of Primary Care, has expressed scepticism over the 70 per cent figure:
“I’ve been doing this job for 25 years and I can tell you can’t establish a quantifiable number in such a short time frame . . . Every expert is saying it’s too early to draw such an inference . . . I would want to have very clear evidence rather than ‘we think it’s more transmissible’ so we can see if it is or not . . . It has massive implications, it’s causing fear and panic, but we should not be in this situation when the Government is putting out data that is unquantifiable.”
According to the government, the ‘mutant strain’ has been circulating since September and Prime Minister Boris Johnson is using it to justify literally cancelling Christmas, his new edict carefully timed to come just after Parliament has gone into recess.
The data the government alleges it has on the ‘new strain’ of COVID comes from “analysis” by an advisory body named (don’t laugh) The New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group (Nervtag).
One member of this group of “experts” is one Professor Neil Ferguson, world famous for his flawed mathematical models and catastrophically wrong predictions. This tells you all you need to know about the reliability of Nervtag.
As one observer told this reporter, “It utterly beggars belief. That our country is in the hands of such buffoons is a hundred times more terrifying than this flu virus.
No one has seen the new data, with the Prime Minster noting it is “early data, “subject to review” but “It’s the best we have at the moment.” In other words the destruction of the country has been accelerated on the basis of an unverified opinion or assertion.
Announcing the previously non-existent ‘Tier Four’ restriction level, Johnson added in the puerile manner we have cone to expect from this charlatan, that it was happening because of a “change in the science”.
A what? God help us is this inept dimwit actually running the country?
Millions of British citizens, fed up with hearing assertions that the gov is “following the science” instead of a blatant political agenda, are asking:
“What science specifically? And how can you change something that has not thus far existed?”
The response by MPS both Tory and the Labour Fake Opposition, has on the whole been marked by the apathy or outright collusion with which Parliament has submitted to the Johnson/Hancock coup. Yet there has been a faint spark of sentience from that quarter with some conservative MPs calling for all the scientific evidence the government has to be made public. Presumably written on the back of a postage stamp will suffice.
We are confident that in time the government will be able to produce enough spin, junk science and flannel to satisfy all but those very few MPs who truly give a rat’s ass about the well being of their country.
Former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith accused the government of being ‘bounced by the science’, noting that Chief Medical Officer Professor Chris Whitty and Chief Scientific Adviser Sir Patrick Vallance are ‘stepping back into the shadows when it suits them’.
This, as far as “being rebellious” is concerned is pretty feeble and as for fighting for your country is right up there with tutting at Genghis Khan as he sweeps down from the Steppes to pillage everything in sight.
In the theatre or TV game show known as “Parliament”, we guess it creates a wafer thin pretence that there are still MPs who really give a crap but that is about it.
Former minister Sir Desmond Swayne who stands out among the invertebrates as someone with the semblance of a spine, said,
“The arrangements for Christmas were explicitly voted on by Parliament. If they’re to be changed then in my view, Parliament should vote again. . . . Parliament voted explicitly for a certain set of arrangements, it seems to be perfectly proper therefore that Parliament should be consulted when those are changed, irrespective of the Government acting in an emergency, nevertheless it’s perfectly proper to recall Parliament at the beginning of this week to at least ratify those changes”.
Swayne noted that MPs haven’t even been given any evidence to justify the heightened restrictions, and that a third of the country was effectively imprisoned via a press conference.
“Explain to us – we are after all a democracy …” [don’t laugh dear reader, we think he meant it] “… explain to the elected representatives the evidence that they have and why they’ve reached this decision. . . . They’ve been looking at it since September and how convenient when Parliament went into recess on Thursday suddenly they were then able to produce this revelation . . . Let’s see the evidence then, let’s have Parliament back and show us and convince us, come clean . . . I want Parliament to be recalled so we can scrutinise properly in a democracy decisions that are being made which affect our economy radically and our liberty.”
His words raise a question of how come, if this mutation has been know about for months, the PM is asserting that this is “early data, “subject to review” and “It’s the best we have at the moment.” More lies?
Plus, if it was known about earlier how come other countries knew nothing about it? If it had been true, they would have been told, surely, and taken action back then to shut their borders.
And here we have yet more about this fiasco that makes no ruddy sense.
Parliament itself may of course be mere stage-managed theatre with our “representatives” heroically returning from their Christmas Hols to “debate” the issue, then rubber-stamp it as they had always planned to do but the big show of a “democratic” debate gives the subversive faction some bogus legitimacy.
We can hear the cries now,
“Look, see! We debated it – carefully avoided any mention of the PCR test on which the whole hoax hinges being a complete fraud – and found our Wise Leader and his Cohorts had been right all along to stuff the citizenry!”
This is not a democracy.
This is a con game.
How much longer will we submit to being the patsies?


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-24--Georgia Runoff: Ossoff Refuses To Disclose Murky Deals With Qatar, China

The 33-year-old trust fund Democrat is facing GOP Sen. David Perdue in one of two crucial Peach State races which will decide whether Democrats control the upper chamber of Congress , as the New York Post reports .
On the campaign trail , Ossoff touts himself as a crusader against corruption who has produced hard-hitting documentaries on fraud in countries like Ghana through his production company , Insight : The World Investigates .
But the Atlanta-born former congressional aide has refused to be transparent about his own personal finances .
Ossoff has been silent on the $ 250,000 loan he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CEO at age 26 in 2013 , or the undisclosed donation he made when he became majority owner , the Washington Post reported Wednesday .
Questions have also arisen over how much money the Democratic darling has accepted from China and Qatar after he brokered deals with a Hong Kong news agency and Qatar-backed Al Jazeera to air two of his films on the Islamic State .
–New York Post Ossoff says it ’ s no big deal because his films were sold to Al Jazeera English , not the Arabic version – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ controlled by Qatar .
He also says that he ‘ only ’ received $ 1,000 in broadcast rights from a Hong Kong company which Perdue says is “ a Communist Chinese news agency.
” The Senate hopeful , who also refuses to release his tax returns ( which we guess is ok now ) , also won ’ t say how much he inherited from his grandfather – a figure the Washington Post estimates is in the millions .
According to his personal disclosure fund , he ’ s worth somewhere between $ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ while he told the Post that the details of his company , which he stepped away from in 2017 for an unsuccessful Congressional run , are “ confidential.
” Wealth has become a central issue in the two Georgia Senate runoff races as Democratic challengers look to topple Perdue , 71 , and Sen. Kelly Loeffler , a Republican lawmaker involved in this year ’ s stock trading controversy .
An investigation ultimately cleared Loeffler of any wrongdoing after she dumped millions of dollars worth of stock following a private briefing for senators @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic .
Perdue is also one of Congress ’ most prolific traders and with a net worth of $ 15.8 million , is one of the wealthiest members of the Senate .
–New York Post Republicans have taken to describing Ossoff as a “ trust fund socialist ” with “ zero real-life accomplishments.
” ( TLB ) published this article from ZeroHedge as compiled and commented on by Tyler Durden .

The 33-year-old trust fund Democrat is facing GOP Sen. David Perdue in one of two crucial Peach State races which will decide whether Democrats control the upper chamber of Congress, as the New York Post reports.
On the campaign trail, Ossoff touts himself as a crusader against corruption who has produced hard-hitting documentaries on fraud in countries like Ghana through his production company, Insight: The World Investigates. But the Atlanta-born former congressional aide has refused to be transparent about his own personal finances. Ossoff has been silent on the $250,000 loan he made to the company when he became CEO at age 26 in 2013, or the undisclosed donation he made when he became majority owner, the Washington Post reported Wednesday. Questions have also arisen over how much money the Democratic darling has accepted from China and Qatar after he brokered deals with a Hong Kong news agency and Qatar-backed Al Jazeera to air two of his films on the Islamic State. –New York Post
Ossoff says it’s no big deal because his films were sold to Al Jazeera English, not the Arabic version – both of which are still owned and controlled by Qatar. He also says that he ‘only’ received $1,000 in broadcast rights from a Hong Kong company which Perdue says is “a Communist Chinese news agency.”
The Senate hopeful, who also refuses to release his tax returns (which we guess is ok now), also won’t say how much he inherited from his grandfather – a figure the Washington Post estimates is in the millions. According to his personal disclosure fund, he’s worth somewhere between $2.3 million and $8 million – while he told the Post that the details of his company, which he stepped away from in 2017 for an unsuccessful Congressional run, are “confidential.”
Wealth has become a central issue in the two Georgia Senate runoff races as Democratic challengers look to topple Perdue, 71, and Sen. Kelly Loeffler, a Republican lawmaker involved in this year’s stock trading controversy. An investigation ultimately cleared Loeffler of any wrongdoing after she dumped millions of dollars worth of stock following a private briefing for senators on COVID-19 at the start of the pandemic. Perdue is also one of Congress’ most prolific traders and with a net worth of $15.8 million, is one of the wealthiest members of the Senate. –New York Post
Republicans have taken to describing Ossoff as a “trust fund socialist” with “zero real-life accomplishments.”
**********
(TLB) published this article from ZeroHedge as compiled and commented on by Tyler Durden.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-24--Airline Officially Launches COVID Passport Ahead Of “Global Deployment” [Video]

Singapore Airlines has become the first carrier to officially launch a COVID passport , which will display the vaccination status and COVID test results of passengers .
The airline announced that its ‘ digital health verification process ’ is the first in the world to be modelled on the International Air Transport Association ’ s ( IATA ) Travel Pass framework .
The airline said it had made the move to start trialling the process because it expects such ‘ immunity passes ’ to become the norm for all airline travel globally .
The company declared that COVID tests and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ integral part ” of air travel for the foreseeable future and that certificates are the most efficient way to “ validate a passenger ’ s health credentials.
” The company proclaimed that the health pass will provide a “ more seamless experience ” for customers and will be a part of “ the new normal.
” The airline noted that all passengers traveling from Jakarta or Kuala Lumpur to Singapore will be mandated to take COVID tests at specific clinics in those cities .
Passengers will be issued either a digital or paper @ @ @ @ @ @ @ code , according to the airline ’ s press release , which will be used as part of check ins and immigration control .
“ Together we will demonstrate that people can return to travel with confidence that they are meeting all government Covid-19 entry requirements , ” commented Nick Careen , IATA ’ s Senior Vice President for Airport , Passenger , and Cargo Security .
“ This will help ensure that SIA ’ s customers will be among the first to benefit as governments re-open their borders with testing or vaccination @ @ @ @ @ @ @ collaboration helps prepare for the eventual global deployment of the IATA Travel Pass , ” Careen added .
As we reported last month , the IATA , the world ’ s largest air transport lobby group , expects its COVID travel pass app to be fully rolled out in the first months of 2021 .
Scores of airline executives and travel industry officials have now indicated that proof of vaccination , through ‘ COVID passports ’ , will become mandatory in order to fly .
Another ‘ COVID passport ’ type system known @ @ @ @ @ @ @ World Economic Forum , is also under development .
A further ‘ COVID passport ’ app called the AOKpass from travel security firm International SOS is currently undergoing trials between Abu Dhabi and Pakistan .
Hundreds of Tech companies are scrambling over themselves to develop COVID passport systems .
( TLB ) published this article from Summit News as written by Steve Watson , with our sincere appreciation for sharing this Global look at the future .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Disclaimer : TLB @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from @ @ @ @

(TLB) ed: Strap in for a ‘bumpy digital ride’ as we connect more dots that lead us to an even more Corporate-Global-Controlled world!!
Airline Officially Launches COVID Passport Ahead Of “Global Deployment”
“The experience gained helps prepare for the eventual global deployment of the Travel Pass”
Steve Watson
Singapore Airlines has become the first carrier to officially launch a COVID passport, which will display the vaccination status and COVID test results of passengers.
The airline announced that its ‘digital health verification process’ is the first in the world to be modelled on the International Air Transport Association’s (IATA) Travel Pass framework.
The airline said it had made the move to start trialling the process because it expects such ‘immunity passes’ to become the norm for all airline travel globally.
The company declared that COVID tests and vaccinations are sure to be “an integral part” of air travel for the foreseeable future and that certificates are the most efficient way to “validate a passenger’s health credentials.”
The company proclaimed that the health pass will provide a “more seamless experience” for customers and will be a part of “the new normal.”
The airline noted that all passengers traveling from Jakarta or Kuala Lumpur to Singapore will be mandated to take COVID tests at specific clinics in those cities.
Passengers will be issued either a digital or paper ‘health certificate’ with a QR code, according to the airline’s press release, which will be used as part of check ins and immigration control.
“Together we will demonstrate that people can return to travel with confidence that they are meeting all government Covid-19 entry requirements,” commented Nick Careen, IATA’s Senior Vice President for Airport, Passenger, and Cargo Security.
“This will help ensure that SIA’s customers will be among the first to benefit as governments re-open their borders with testing or vaccination requirements. And the experience gained through collaboration helps prepare for the eventual global deployment of the IATA Travel Pass,” Careen added.
As we reported last month, the IATA, the world’s largest air transport lobby group, expects its COVID travel pass app to be fully rolled out in the first months of 2021.
Scores of airline executives and travel industry officials have now indicated that proof of vaccination, through ‘COVID passports’, will become mandatory in order to fly.
Another ‘COVID passport’ type system known as the CommonPass, sponsored by the World Economic Forum, is also under development.
A further ‘COVID passport’ app called the AOKpass from travel security firm International SOS is currently undergoing trials between Abu Dhabi and Pakistan.
Hundreds of Tech companies are scrambling over themselves to develop COVID passport systems.
*********
(TLB) published this article from Summit News as written by Steve Watson, with our sincere appreciation for sharing this Global look at the future.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-24--Shutdown Looms As Democrat Bid For $2,000 Relief Checks Fails House

House Democrats on Thursday failed to replace the $ 600 direct checks in the latest pandemic relief bill with $ 2,000 payments demanded by President Trump this week – which House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer ( D-MD ) sought to pass by unanimous consent , only to be blocked by House Republicans .
House Democrats will try again on Monday , with a new stand-alone bill for the $ 2,000 checks , according to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ( D-CA ) .
The House will also attempt to override Trump ’ s veto of the National Defense Authorization Act as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ To avoid a shutdown , the House could also pass another stopgap measure – however several pandemic relief measures will also run out between Saturday and Dec. 31 , including $ 300 per week in bonus unemployment insurance and a moratorium on rent-related evictions .
Politico ’ s Jake Sherman opines on the next steps after Trump tossed lighter fluid and a match on GOP leaders , who largely failed to support his challenge to the November election… .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .
Disclaimer : The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ text , graphics , images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction .
Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice , diagnosis or treatment .

Shutdown Looms As Democrat Bid For $2,000 Relief Checks Fails House
Here’s What Happens Next
.
House Democrats on Thursday failed to replace the $600 direct checks in the latest pandemic relief bill with $2,000 payments demanded by President Trump this week – which House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) sought to pass by unanimous consent, only to be blocked by House Republicans.
House Democrats will try again on Monday, with a new stand-alone bill for the $2,000 checks, according to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). The House will also attempt to override Trump’s veto of the National Defense Authorization Act as government funding is set to lapse.
To avoid a shutdown, the House could also pass another stopgap measure – however several pandemic relief measures will also run out between Saturday and Dec. 31, including $300 per week in bonus unemployment insurance and a moratorium on rent-related evictions. Politico’s Jake Sherman opines on the next steps after Trump tossed lighter fluid and a match on GOP leaders, who largely failed to support his challenge to the November election…. Continue reading from ZeroHedge… •••• •••• Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.