thelibertybeacon--2020-05-17--Dr. Knut Wittkowski Strikes Again: ‘We could open up again and forget the whole thing’

Reiterating the well-known point that covid is only dangerous to those having ‘ age-related severe comorbidities ’ , and that people in nursing homes are very vulnerable , he says that the virus is now over in China and South Korea .
Further , Protecting the hospitals was completely misguided .
The original reason given for the lockdown , he says , was to ‘ prevent hospitals from become overloaded ’ but he says that this couldn ’ t have happened anyway , irrespective of the approach taken .
‘ Flattening the curve ’ , i.e .
prolonging the epidemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the same number of cases ‘ over a longer period of time because otherwise the hospitals would not have enough capacity , ’ but the vast majority do not end up in hospital : ‘ It is substantially down in most of Europe and down a bit everywhere , even in the UK .
The UK and Belarus are latecomers , so you do not see exactly what you are seeing in continental Europe .
But everywhere in Europe , the number of cases is substantially declining.
’ On herd immunity , studies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ already have at least 25 per cent of the population who are immune… If 25 per cent of the population are already immune , we are very quickly getting to the 50 per cent that we need to have what is called herd immunity .
We will actually get a bit higher than that… ’ It wouldn ’ t actually be a problem to let the infection run its course because ‘ we already have enough immune people in the population.
’ On the newly-touted second spike by the MSM , he says @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a policy that politicians are afraid of reversing.
’ Fingering our governments for listening to Neil Ferguson , ‘ who has a history of coming up with projections that are a bit odd ’ , ‘ the government did not convene a meeting with people who have different ideas , different projections , to discuss his projection .
If it had done that , it could have seen where the fundamental flaw was… ’ , of assuming that one percent of all infected people would die .
Neither in Wuhan nor South Korea @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people infected die… The South Korean government was extremely proud to have resisted pressure to drop the very basic concepts of democracy.
’ He continues : ‘ The epidemic in South Korea was over by March , the number of cases was down by 13 March .
In Wuhan they also did not shut down the economy…We have seen , then , in Wuhan and South Korea , if you do not do anything , the epidemic is over in three weeks… one per cent of all people infected does not make any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by mid-March .
On the situation in Italy , Wittkowski fingers the policy of shutting schools so that children , who are generally not affected by the virus , didn ’ t achieve immunity : But then , Italy did an illogical thing .
It closed schools so that the schoolchildren were isolated and did not get infected and did not become immune .
Instead , the virus spread almost exclusively among the old , causing more deaths and a higher utilisation of hospitals .
And that is mind-boggling .
Very early on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ knew from South Korea that this is an epidemic that runs its course , and there was nothing special about it .
But when it hit Italy , we stopped thinking about it as an age-stratified problem , and instead lumped everyone all together .
The idea that if we did not shut down the schools , the hospitals would have been overwhelmed does not make any sense .
I frankly still can not fully understand how our governments can be so stupid .
On the topic of certain scientists having the power @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , he claims the problem lies in scientists being dependent on government funding : Scientists are in a very strange situation .
They now depend on government funding , which is a trend that has developed over the past 40 years .
Before that , when you were a professor at a university , you had your salary and you had your freedom .
Now , the university gives you a desk and access to the library .
And then you have to ask for government money and write grant applications .
If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , what does that do to your chance of getting funded ?
It creates a huge conflict of interest .
The people who are speaking out in Germany and Switzerland are all independent of government money because they are retired .
Sweden , he continues , generally took the right approach despite the heat they took for it , except for their large nursing homes , which were not closed and where the largest number of deaths took place : So the US ’ first death in a Seattle nursing home in February @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to come , plus Italy ’ s situation of deaths among the elderly , yet New York State recently ‘ told the nursing homes that if they did not take in patients from hospitals , they would lose their funding .
So they would have to import the virus from the hospitals.
’ 20,000 deaths in the United States could have been prevented by just isolating the nursing homes .
‘ After three or four weeks , they could have reopened and everybody would be happy.
’ That would have been a reasonable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ driving the economy against the wall – there was no reason for it .
The only reason that this nonsense now goes on and on , and people are inventing things like this ‘ second wave ’ , which is going to force us to change society and never live again , is that the politicians are afraid of admitting an error .
And it ’ s not a matter of hindsight , either .
The Wuhan and South Korean epidemics were over by mid-March , and the data had officially been collected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ peak in hospital visits due to Covid-19 occurred on 8 March , presented in a coronavirus presidential briefing at the White House by Robert Redfield on 17 April : … on 8 April , the number of new infections was already down .
In time for Easter , our governments should have acknowledged they were overly cautious… Two weeks ’ shutdown would not have been the end of the world .
We would not have what we have now – 30 million people unemployed in the United States , for example… We see @ @ @ @ @ @ @ otherwise have had .
‘ So we could open up , and forget the whole thing .
’

Reiterating the well-known point that covid is only dangerous to those having ‘age-related severe comorbidities’, and that people in nursing homes are very vulnerable, he says that the virus is now over in China and South Korea . Further,
Protecting the hospitals was completely misguided. The original reason given for the lockdown, he says, was to ‘prevent hospitals from become overloaded’ but he says that this couldn’t have happened anyway, irrespective of the approach taken . ‘Flattening the curve’, i.e. prolonging the epidemic, was only ever about spreading out the same number of cases ‘over a longer period of time because otherwise the hospitals would not have enough capacity,’ but the vast majority do not end up in hospital :
‘It is substantially down in most of Europe and down a bit everywhere, even in the UK. The UK and Belarus are latecomers, so you do not see exactly what you are seeing in continental Europe. But everywhere in Europe, the number of cases is substantially declining.’
On herd immunity , studies done so far show ‘that we already have at least 25 per cent of the population who are immune… If 25 per cent of the population are already immune, we are very quickly getting to the 50 per cent that we need to have what is called herd immunity. We will actually get a bit higher than that…’ It wouldn’t actually be a problem to let the infection run its course because ‘we already have enough immune people in the population.’
On the newly-touted second spike by the MSM, he says ‘this is an invention to justify a policy that politicians are afraid of reversing.’
Social distancing? ‘No’:
People need to ask the government for an explanation. The government is restricting freedom. You do not have to ask me for justification. There is no justification.
Fingering our governments for listening to Neil Ferguson, ‘who has a history of coming up with projections that are a bit odd’, ‘the government did not convene a meeting with people who have different ideas, different projections, to discuss his projection. If it had done that, it could have seen where the fundamental flaw was…’, of assuming that one percent of all infected people would die. Neither in Wuhan nor South Korea ‘did one per cent of all people infected die… The South Korean government was extremely proud to have resisted pressure to drop the very basic concepts of democracy.’ He continues:
‘The epidemic in South Korea was over by March, the number of cases was down by 13 March. In Wuhan they also did not shut down the economy…We have seen, then, in Wuhan and South Korea, if you do not do anything, the epidemic is over in three weeks… one per cent of all people infected does not make any sense. And we had that evidence by mid-March.
On the situation in Italy, Wittkowski fingers the policy of shutting schools so that children, who are generally not affected by the virus, didn’t achieve immunity:
But then, Italy did an illogical thing. It closed schools so that the schoolchildren were isolated and did not get infected and did not become immune. Instead, the virus spread almost exclusively among the old, causing more deaths and a higher utilisation of hospitals. And that is mind-boggling. Very early on, we knew from China and we knew from South Korea that this is an epidemic that runs its course, and there was nothing special about it. But when it hit Italy, we stopped thinking about it as an age-stratified problem, and instead lumped everyone all together. The idea that if we did not shut down the schools, the hospitals would have been overwhelmed does not make any sense. I frankly still cannot fully understand how our governments can be so stupid.
On the topic of certain scientists having the power to dispense strange advice to our governments, he claims the problem lies in scientists being dependent on government funding:
Scientists are in a very strange situation. They now depend on government funding, which is a trend that has developed over the past 40 years. Before that, when you were a professor at a university, you had your salary and you had your freedom. Now, the university gives you a desk and access to the library. And then you have to ask for government money and write grant applications. If you are known to criticise the government, what does that do to your chance of getting funded? It creates a huge conflict of interest. The people who are speaking out in Germany and Switzerland are all independent of government money because they are retired.
Sweden, he continues, generally took the right approach despite the heat they took for it, except for their large nursing homes, which were not closed and where the largest number of deaths took place:
They decided to keep society open and they forgot to close nursing homes. Remarkably, the politicians acknowledged that it was a mistake to extend that open concept to nursing homes. The nursing homes should have been isolated to protect the elderly who are at high risk.
So the US’ first death in a Seattle nursing home in February gave a strong indication of what was to come, plus Italy’s situation of deaths among the elderly, yet New York State recently ‘told the nursing homes that if they did not take in patients from hospitals, they would lose their funding. So they would have to import the virus from the hospitals.’ 20,000 deaths in the United States could have been prevented by just isolating the nursing homes. ‘After three or four weeks, they could have reopened and everybody would be happy.’
That would have been a reasonable strategy. But shutting down schools, driving the economy against the wall – there was no reason for it. The only reason that this nonsense now goes on and on, and people are inventing things like this ‘second wave’, which is going to force us to change society and never live again, is that the politicians are afraid of admitting an error.
And it’s not a matter of hindsight, either. The Wuhan and South Korean epidemics were over by mid-March, and the data had officially been collected and published on it.
The US peak in hospital visits due to Covid-19 occurred on 8 March, presented in a coronavirus presidential briefing at the White House by Robert Redfield on 17 April:
… on 8 April, the number of new infections was already down. In time for Easter, our governments should have acknowledged they were overly cautious… Two weeks’ shutdown would not have been the end of the world. We would not have what we have now – 30 million people unemployed in the United States, for example… We see more deaths and illness than we would otherwise have had.
So?
‘So we could open up, and forget the whole thing.’
************
Full interview at Spiked online magazine


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-18--UK NHS surgeon exposes COVID 19 hoax

UK NHS surgeon exposes COVID 19 hoax

Who will stand tall , unbent by the storm of lies , uncowed by the snarling of The Beast ?
Dr Mohammad Iqbal Adil is not just a random conspiracy theorist .
He is a highly qualified consultant surgeon with the NHS who has observed from the inside what is being done to the NHS using the so-called COVID19 pandemic as a smoke screen .
It takes a great deal of courage to speak out the way he has done .
We hope that other professionals will pluck up the courage to do the same rather than stand silent whilst @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a biscuit barrel .
Dr Iqbal has doubtless placed his career and good name on the line by speaking out ( we have all seen the viciousness with with which voices of dissent are silenced ) so the least we can do is hear him out .
There is a vast amount at stake here , not least of which is the very future of the NHS .
We ’ ve all seen the propaganda from our government , how submitting to the Lockdown will “ save the NHS ” when the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sell it off to the government ’ s pals in big business .
We have been urged day in and day out to “ save lives ” but the truth of the matter is the Lockdown of society and partial shut down of the NHS is costing far more lives than it is purportedly saving , The layed-off staff , cancelled operatioms , falsified stats , false test positives , quiet hospitals working well below capacity , “ do not resuscitate ” orders , and what is increasingly beginning to look like a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ real enemy of the NHS and indeed of the country is not some smoke-and-mirrors “ epidemic ” .
The real enemy , or his stooges and proxies , lie within our government .
The first video below gives you a brief summary by Dr Adil of what is really happening inside the NHS – and why .
The second video goes into a lot more detail and is well worth watching all the way through .
The above feature is from UK Reloaded The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use @ @ @ @ @ @ @ copyright owner .

Who will stand tall, unbent by the storm of lies, uncowed by the snarling of The Beast?
Introduction by Steve Cook
Dr Mohammad Iqbal Adil is not just a random conspiracy theorist. He is a highly qualified consultant surgeon with the NHS who has observed from the inside what is being done to the NHS using the so-called COVID19 pandemic as a smoke screen.
It takes a great deal of courage to speak out the way he has done. We hope that other professionals will pluck up the courage to do the same rather than stand silent whilst the world around them goes to hell in a biscuit barrel.
Dr Iqbal has doubtless placed his career and good name on the line by speaking out (we have all seen the viciousness with with which voices of dissent are silenced) so the least we can do is hear him out.
There is a vast amount at stake here, not least of which is the very future of the NHS. We’ve all seen the propaganda from our government, how submitting to the Lockdown will “save the NHS” when the intention in the long term is to sell it off to the government’s pals in big business.
We have been urged day in and day out to “save lives” but the truth of the matter is the Lockdown of society and partial shut down of the NHS is costing far more lives than it is purportedly saving,
The layed-off staff, cancelled operatioms, falsified stats, false test positives, quiet hospitals working well below capacity, “do not resuscitate” orders, and what is increasingly beginning to look like a form of institutionalised euthenasia indicate that the real enemy of the NHS and indeed of the country is not some smoke-and-mirrors “epidemic”.
The real enemy, or his stooges and proxies, lie within our government.
The first video below gives you a brief summary by Dr Adil of what is really happening inside the NHS – and why.
The second video goes into a lot more detail and is well worth watching all the way through.
The above feature is from UK Reloaded
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-18--The ‘Unmasking’ Of Joe Biden  [Article by Jonathan Turley]

The contradictions revealed in recent disclosures , including the list of officials seeking to “ unmask ” the identity of former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn , are shocking .
There seems a virtual news blackout on these disclosures , including the fact that both former President Barack Obama and former Vice President Joe Biden followed the investigation .
Indeed , Biden ’ s name is on the unmasking list .
The declassification of material from the Michael Flynn case has exposed more chilling details of an effort by prosecutors to come up with a crime to use against the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , however , a letter revealed another unsettling detail .
Among over three dozen Obama administration officials seeking to “ unmask ” Flynn in the investigation was former Vice President Joe Biden .
This revelation came less than a day after Biden denied any involvement in the investigation of Flynn .
It also follows a disclosure that President Obama was aware of that investigation .
For three years , many in the media have expressed horror at the notion of the Trump campaign colluding with Russia to influence the 2016 election .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such collusion .
In recently released transcripts , a long list of Obama administration officials admitted they never saw any evidence of such Russian collusion .
That included the testimony of Evelyn Farkas , a former White House adviser who was widely quoted by the media with her public plea for Congress to gather all of the evidence that she learned of as part of the Obama administration .
The media covered her concern that this evidence would be lost “ if they found out how we knew what we knew ” about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Yet in her classified testimony under oath , she said she did not know anything .
Farkas is now running for Congress in New York and highlighting her role in raising “ alarm ” over collusion .
As much of the media blindly pushed this story , a worrying story unfolded over the use of federal power to investigate political opponents .
There is very little question that the response by the media to such a story would have been overwhelming if George Bush and his administration had targeted the Obama campaign @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would have been encompassing if it was learned that there was no direct evidence to justify the investigation and that the underlying allegation of Russian collusion was ultimately found to lack a credible basis .
But the motives of Obama administration officials are apparently not to be questioned .
Indeed , back when candidate Donald Trump said the Obama administration placed his campaign officials under surveillance , the media universally mocked him .
That statement was later proven to be true .
The Obama administration used the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Yet none of this matters as the media remains fully invested in the original false allegations of collusion .
If Obama administration officials were to be questioned now , the coverage and judgment of the media may be placed into question , as even this latest disclosure from the investigation of the unmasking request of Biden will not alter the media narrative .
Unmasking occurs when an official asks an intelligence agency to remove anonymous designations hiding the identity of an individual .
This masking is a very important protection of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up in national security surveillance .
The importance of this privacy protection is being dismissed by media figures , like Andrea Mitchell , who declared the Biden story to be nothing more than gaslighting .
While unmasking is more routinely requested by intelligence officials , with a reported 10,000 such requests by the National Security Agency last year alone , it is presumably less common for figures like Biden or White House chief of staff Denis McDonough .
Seeking unmasking information that was likely to reveal the name of a political opponent and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ concern .
More importantly , it adds a detail of the scope of interest and involvement in an investigation that targeted Flynn without any compelling evidence of a crime or collusion .
The media portrayed both Obama and Biden as uninvolved .
But now we know they both actively followed the investigation .
According to former acting attorney general Sally Yates , she was surprised that Obama knew about the investigation and knew more than she did at the time .
Obama called upon former FBI director James Comey to stay after a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had mentioned using the Logan Act to charge Flynn , even though the unconstitutional law has never been used successfully in a prosecution since the country was founded .
Biden has repeatedly denied knowledge of the investigation .
Just a day before the latest disclosure , George Stephanopoulos asked Biden in an interview what he knew of the Flynn investigation .
Biden was adamant that he knew nothing about “ those moves ” and he called it a diversion .
But that is not true if he took the relatively uncommon action for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Flynn information .
Yet none of this matters .
A Democratic administration using a secret court to investigate the opposing political campaign does not matter to many in Congress or in the media anyway .
An investigation continuing despite the lack of credible information supporting collusion does not matter to them either .
A president and a vice president who take personal interest in the surveillance of their political opponents also does not matter .
There was a time , however , when all of this did matter .
There was once @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as the story of the century , including the unmasking of Biden himself in this investigation .
But these are not those times , and this can not be the story .
Russian collusion is the story and , as Biden stressed , the rest is just a diversion .
It is up to the public to decide who has been ultimately unmasked by the Flynn investigation .
Professor Jonathan Turley is a nationally recognized legal scholar who has written extensively in areas ranging from constitutional law to legal theory to tort law @ @ @ @ @ @ @ academic articles that have appeared in a variety of leading law journals at Cornell , Duke , Georgetown , Harvard , Northwestern , University of Chicago , and other schools .
After a stint at Tulane Law School , Professor Turley joined the George Washington faculty in 1990 and , in 1998 , was given the prestigious Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law , the youngest chaired professor in the school ’ s history .
In addition to his extensive publications , Professor Turley has served as counsel in some of the most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ including the representation of whistleblowers , military personnel , judges , members of Congress , and a wide range of other clients .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects @ @ @ @ @ @ @ installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

The ‘Unmasking’ Of Joe Biden
JONATHAN TURLEY
The contradictions revealed in recent disclosures, including the list of officials seeking to “unmask” the identity of former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, are shocking. There seems a virtual news blackout on these disclosures, including the fact that both former President Barack Obama and former Vice President Joe Biden followed the investigation.
Indeed, Biden’s name is on the unmasking list.
The declassification of material from the Michael Flynn case has exposed more chilling details of an effort by prosecutors to come up with a crime to use against the former national security adviser. This week, however, a letter revealed another unsettling detail. Among over three dozen Obama administration officials seeking to “unmask” Flynn in the investigation was former Vice President Joe Biden. This revelation came less than a day after Biden denied any involvement in the investigation of Flynn. It also follows a disclosure that President Obama was aware of that investigation.
For three years, many in the media have expressed horror at the notion of the Trump campaign colluding with Russia to influence the 2016 election. We know there was never credible evidence of such collusion. In recently released transcripts, a long list of Obama administration officials admitted they never saw any evidence of such Russian collusion. That included the testimony of Evelyn Farkas, a former White House adviser who was widely quoted by the media with her public plea for Congress to gather all of the evidence that she learned of as part of the Obama administration.
The media covered her concern that this evidence would be lost “if they found out how we knew what we knew” about Trump campaign officials “dealing with Russians.” Yet in her classified testimony under oath, she said she did not know anything. Farkas is now running for Congress in New York and highlighting her role in raising “alarm” over collusion. As much of the media blindly pushed this story, a worrying story unfolded over the use of federal power to investigate political opponents.
There is very little question that the response by the media to such a story would have been overwhelming if George Bush and his administration had targeted the Obama campaign figures with secret surveillance. That story would have been encompassing if it was learned that there was no direct evidence to justify the investigation and that the underlying allegation of Russian collusion was ultimately found to lack a credible basis.
But the motives of Obama administration officials are apparently not to be questioned. Indeed, back when candidate Donald Trump said the Obama administration placed his campaign officials under surveillance, the media universally mocked him. That statement was later proven to be true. The Obama administration used the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court to conduct surveillance of Trump campaign officials.
Yet none of this matters as the media remains fully invested in the original false allegations of collusion. If Obama administration officials were to be questioned now, the coverage and judgment of the media may be placed into question, as even this latest disclosure from the investigation of the unmasking request of Biden will not alter the media narrative.
Unmasking occurs when an official asks an intelligence agency to remove anonymous designations hiding the identity of an individual. This masking is a very important protection of the privacy of American citizens who are caught up in national security surveillance. The importance of this privacy protection is being dismissed by media figures, like Andrea Mitchell, who declared the Biden story to be nothing more than gaslighting.
While unmasking is more routinely requested by intelligence officials, with a reported 10,000 such requests by the National Security Agency last year alone, it is presumably less common for figures like Biden or White House chief of staff Denis McDonough. Seeking unmasking information that was likely to reveal the name of a political opponent and possibly damage the Trump administration raises a concern. More importantly, it adds a detail of the scope of interest and involvement in an investigation that targeted Flynn without any compelling evidence of a crime or collusion.
The media portrayed both Obama and Biden as uninvolved. But now we know they both actively followed the investigation. According to former acting attorney general Sally Yates, she was surprised that Obama knew about the investigation and knew more than she did at the time. Obama called upon former FBI director James Comey to stay after a meeting to discuss the investigation. Comey had mentioned using the Logan Act to charge Flynn, even though the unconstitutional law has never been used successfully in a prosecution since the country was founded.
Biden has repeatedly denied knowledge of the investigation. Just a day before the latest disclosure, George Stephanopoulos asked Biden in an interview what he knew of the Flynn investigation. Biden was adamant that he knew nothing about “those moves” and he called it a diversion. But that is not true if he took the relatively uncommon action for a vice president of demanding the unmasking of Flynn information.
Yet none of this matters. A Democratic administration using a secret court to investigate the opposing political campaign does not matter to many in Congress or in the media anyway. An investigation continuing despite the lack of credible information supporting collusion does not matter to them either. A president and a vice president who take personal interest in the surveillance of their political opponents also does not matter.
There was a time, however, when all of this did matter. There was once a time when this would be viewed as the story of the century, including the unmasking of Biden himself in this investigation. But these are not those times, and this cannot be the story. Russian collusion is the story and, as Biden stressed, the rest is just a diversion. It is up to the public to decide who has been ultimately unmasked by the Flynn investigation.
*********
(TLB) published this article from J
Bio
Professor Jonathan Turley is a nationally recognized legal scholar who has written extensively in areas ranging from constitutional law to legal theory to tort law. He has written over three dozen academic articles that have appeared in a variety of leading law journals at Cornell, Duke, Georgetown, Harvard, Northwestern, University of Chicago, and other schools.
After a stint at Tulane Law School, Professor Turley joined the George Washington faculty in 1990 and, in 1998, was given the prestigious Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law, the youngest chaired professor in the school’s history. In addition to his extensive publications, Professor Turley has served as counsel in some of the most notable cases in the last two decades including the representation of whistleblowers, military personnel, judges, members of Congress, and a wide range of other clients.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-18--Obama Staffer Scrambles To Salvage Reputation After Trump-Russia Lies Exposed

Obama Staffer Scrambles To Salvage Reputation After Trump-Russia Lies Exposed , Implies Zero Hedge A “ Disinformation Clearinghouse ” Atlantic Council senior fellow , Congressional candidate , and Russia conspiracy theorist Evelyn Farkas is desperately trying to salvage her reputation after recently released transcripts from her closed-door 2017 testimony to the House Intelligence Committee revealed she totally lied on national TV .
In March of 2017 , Farkas confidently told MSNBC ‘ s Mika Brzezinski : “ The Trump folks , if they found out how we knew what we knew about the Trump staff dealing with Russians , that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and methods , meaning we would not longer have access to that intelligence.
” Except , during testimony to the House , Farkas admitted she lied .
When pressed by former Rep. Trey Gowdy ( R-SC ) on why she said ‘ we ’ – referring to the US government , Farkas said she “ didn ’ t know anything.
” In short , she was either illegally discussing US intelligence matters with her “ former colleagues , ” or she made the whole thing up .
Now , Farkas is in damage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Post that her testimony demonstrated “ that I had not leaked intelligence and that my early intuition about Trump-Kremlin cooperation was valid.
’ She also claims that her comments to MSNBC were based on “ media reports and statements by Obama administration officials and the intelligence community , ” which had “ began unearthing connections between Trump ’ s campaign and Russia.
” Farkas is now blaming a ‘ disconcerting nexus between Russia and the reactionary right , ’ for making her look bad ( apparently Trey Gowdy is part of the “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she meant by “ we ” ) .
Attacks against me came first on Twitter and other social media platforms , from far-right sources .
Forensics data I was shown suggested at least one entity had Russian ties .
The attacks increased in quantity and ferocity until Fox News and Trump-allied Republicans — higher-profile , and more mainstream , sources — also criticized me .
Trump surrogates , including former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski , Donald Trump Jr. and Fox News hosts such as Tucker Carlson have essentially accused me of treason for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” of the “ Russia hoax.
” -Evelyn Farkas She then parrots the Democratic talking point that the attacks she ’ s received are part of Trump ’ s larger “ Obamagate ” allegations – “ a narrative that distracts attention from his administration ’ s disastrous pandemic response and attempts to defect blame for Russian interference onto the Obama administration ” ( Obama told Putin to ‘ cut it out ‘ after all ) .
Meanwhile , Poor Evelyn ’ s campaign staff has become “ emotionally exhausted ” after her Facebook @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ overwhelmed with a stream of vile , vulgar and sometimes violent messages ” in response to the plethora of conservative outlets which have called her out for Russia malarkey .
There is evidence that Russian actors are contributing to these attacks .
The same day that right-wing pundits began pumping accusations , newly created Russian Twitter accounts picked them up .
Within a day , Russian “ disinformation clearinghouses ” posted versions of the story .
Many of the Twitter accounts boosting attacks have posted in unison , a sign of inauthentic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hedge is included in said ‘ disinformation clearinghouses ‘ Farkas fails to expound on .
She closes by defiantly claiming “ I wasn ’ t silenced in 2017 , and I won ’ t be silenced now.
” No Evelyn , nobody is silencing you .
You ’ re being called out for your role in the perhaps the largest , most divisive hoax in US history – which was based on faulty intelligence that includes crowdstrike admitting they had no proof of that Russia exfiltrated DNC emails , and Christopher Steele ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Russian sources.
’ ( TLB ) published this article from ZeroHedge as compiled and commented on by Tyler Durden .
Did Obama Defense Deputy Lie To Protect Her Fraudulent Russiagate Sources ?
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Obama Staffer Scrambles To Salvage Reputation After Trump-Russia Lies Exposed, Implies Zero Hedge A “Disinformation Clearinghouse”
Tyler Durden
Atlantic Council senior fellow, Congressional candidate, and Russia conspiracy theorist Evelyn Farkas is desperately trying to salvage her reputation after recently released transcripts from her closed-door 2017 testimony to the House Intelligence Committee revealed she totally lied on national TV.
In March of 2017, Farkas confidently told MSNBC‘s Mika Brzezinski: “The Trump folks, if they found out how we knew what we knew about the Trump staff dealing with Russians, that they would try to compromise those sources and methods, meaning we would not longer have access to that intelligence.”
Except, during testimony to the House, Farkas admitted she lied. When pressed by former Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) on why she said ‘we’ – referring to the US government, Farkas said she “didn’t know anything.”
In short, she was either illegally discussing US intelligence matters with her “former colleagues,” or she made the whole thing up.
Now, Farkas is in damage control mode – writing in the Washington Post that her testimony demonstrated “that I had not leaked intelligence and that my early intuition about Trump-Kremlin cooperation was valid.’ She also claims that her comments to MSNBC were based on “media reports and statements by Obama administration officials and the intelligence community,” which had “began unearthing connections between Trump’s campaign and Russia.”
Farkas is now blaming a ‘disconcerting nexus between Russia and the reactionary right,’ for making her look bad (apparently Trey Gowdy is part of the “reactionary right” for asking her who she meant by “we”).
Attacks against me came first on Twitter and other social media platforms, from far-right sources. Forensics data I was shown suggested at least one entity had Russian ties. The attacks increased in quantity and ferocity until Fox News and Trump-allied Republicans — higher-profile, and more mainstream, sources — also criticized me. … Trump surrogates, including former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, Donald Trump Jr. and Fox News hosts such as Tucker Carlson have essentially accused me of treason for being one of the “fraudulent originators” of the “Russia hoax.” -Evelyn Farkas She then parrots the Democratic talking point that the attacks she’s received are part of Trump’s larger “Obamagate” allegations – “a narrative that distracts attention from his administration’s disastrous pandemic response and attempts to defect blame for Russian interference onto the Obama administration” (Obama told Putin to ‘cut it out‘ after all). Meanwhile, Poor Evelyn’s campaign staff has become “emotionally exhausted” after her Facebook, Twitter and Instagram accounts have been “overwhelmed with a stream of vile, vulgar and sometimes violent messages” in response to the plethora of conservative outlets which have called her out for Russia malarkey. There is evidence that Russian actors are contributing to these attacks. The same day that right-wing pundits began pumping accusations, newly created Russian Twitter accounts picked them up. Within a day, Russian “disinformation clearinghouses” posted versions of the story. Many of the Twitter accounts boosting attacks have posted in unison, a sign of inauthentic social media behavior. We assume Zero Hedge is included in said ‘disinformation clearinghouses‘ Farkas fails to expound on. She closes by defiantly claiming “I wasn’t silenced in 2017, and I won’t be silenced now.” No Evelyn, nobody is silencing you. You’re being called out for your role in the perhaps the largest, most divisive hoax in US history – which was based on faulty intelligence that includes crowdstrike admitting they had no proof of that Russia exfiltrated DNC emails, and Christopher Steele’s absurd dossier based on his ‘Russian sources.’ ********* (TLB) published this article from ZeroHedge as compiled and commented on by Tyler Durden. Related from The Liberty Beacon: Did Obama Defense Deputy Lie To Protect Her Fraudulent Russiagate Sources? •••• •••• Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-18--David V. Goliath: 11 y/o on a Mission to Educate About 5G Harms & Protect his Mom

David V. Goliath : An 11 y/o is on a Mission to Educate About 5G Harms and Protect his Mom David , an 11-year-old from Idaho , first became aware of wireless harms through his mother Robin ’ s microwave sickness .
What started out as headaches and nausea turned to vertigo and migraines until one day David found his mother lying on the floor in the midst of a heart attack .
He was nine years old at the time .
After being rushed to the hospital , the cardiologist working with Robin assured the family that there was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ heart was very strong for her age .
The family continued to see a string of other doctors who all said the same thing : “ No problem.
” It was David ’ s father who first made the connection to wireless harms .
An Air Force veteran , David ’ s father was working at the Dresden nuclear facility where he realized his wife ’ s symptoms matched signs of radiation sickness .
Robin has since been officially diagnosed with microwave sickness by Dr. William Rea of the Environmental Health Center in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an EMR mitigation professional who assessed their home and helped them remove the Wi-Fi , DECT cordless phones , and dirty electricity .
But it wasn ’ t enough .
At the time , the family was living between nine cell towers with a high power line a block away .
Unable to live in such an EMR-saturated environment , the family moved into a steel storage unit in an industrial park , and later to the mountains of Idaho .
Unfortunately , 5G deployment was not far behind .
5G antennas entered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there is a 5G antenna erected near either end of their trailer—and Robin ’ s symptoms are increasing again .
Idaho ’ s 5G antennas use a frequency of 600MHz which can travel hundreds of square miles .
From the start , David has been his mother ’ s self-professed “ greatest advocate.
” His specialty is to frame mind-boggling concepts into a series of simple facts .
In Illinois , he prepared a speech on wireless harms for his county ’ s 4-H competition on 5G and associated wireless harms .
He @ @ @ @ @ @ @ book Radiation Nation by Daniel and Ryan DeBaun .
The response was disappointing to say the least .
Although David came prepared with studies , books , and charts , only one family stopped by after his presentation to check out the materials .
While he was awarded “ 1st Alternate , ” the judges decided not to move David ’ s project to the state level because it was “ too scary.
” Since then , David has continued to actively raise awareness of wireless harms .
In Minnesota , he gave @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s Director of 5G and Wireless Harms Project .
More recently , David has spoken against 5G to Bonner County ’ s Republican Central Committee as well as Sandpoint ’ s mayor , Shelby Rognstad .
When asked what his goals are in this area , David says , You , Me , and 5G How many of you have a smart home ?
If you do it is an unhealthy home .
What if I told you ALL biological life here on Earth is in danger and that this danger is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , taste or feel unless you ’ ve become sensitive to it ?
Have any of you wondered about the massive die-off of the world ’ s bee population ?
Our world has had one significant change that I would like to mention , and it has occurred within the last 125 years , that change is man-made radiation from electricity .
From your cell phone to nuclear subs , radiation is permeating our planet affecting ALL biological life and the accumulative effects will continue to cause harm with the introduction of 5G @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is 5G ?
” To put it bluntly , 5G is solely for the purpose of machines , not biological beings .
Those who sing its praise say it will usher in a new age for the Internet of Things , or IOT by connecting all wireless devices .
This Internet of THINGS , NOT BEINGS , should give us pause because it is being deployed without the public ’ s knowledge , and its implementation is going against the proven warnings from doctors and scientists alike worldwide whose main concern is the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exposure to this radiation .
The people who push 5G care about money and control .
Consider this fact : 5G has NOT been shown to be safe , but then again 4G , 3G , 2G , our smart meters , and cell phones haven ’ t been proven safe either .
In fact , quite the opposite !
Think about the hundreds of thousands of deaths from smoking , asbestos , mercury , PCBs and lead paint all said to be safe at one time .
Unlike smoking , there is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the radiation we are being exposed to daily .
Some say 5G will be great , but for who ?
Are we just going to take THEIR word for it ?
Scientists have shown that there is extensive cellular damage from microwave radiation at levels far lower than what it takes to heat tissue .
We are surrounded by radiation in and outside of our homes from baby monitors to cell towers , even our cars are drowning us in damaging radiation .
5G will put millions of radiation-emitting cells on our buildings @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
These mini cell towers will even be put in our front yards !
Would you want this in front of your home ?
A newly published study out of Israel clearly shows 5G frequencies will affect all biological beings .
In 2017 , more than 180 doctors and scientists from 35 countries around the world presented a scientific appeal stating the deadly effects from this radiation .
It has been scientifically proven repeatedly that there is a link between wireless radiation and a host of serious illness .
Unfortunately , people who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ often misdiagnosed ; in many cases , their symptoms are deemed hereditary when it could clearly be shown to be environmental .
We are all different and because of this our symptoms are also .
Look at Lyme disease to see how varied the reactions are , so to with radiation .
For some it may simply start as headaches and or fatigue , for others it may be ADHD , but as the gradual accumulation of radiation continues , the individual symptoms will become more pronounced and health issues pile on top @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
At some point , all those symptoms could become life threatening .
Each and every one of you sitting here today is being affected , right here , right now .
So the question I would like to leave you with is this : What are you going to do about it ?
Thank you .
CHD ’ s EMF Child Ambassador Program aim is to both highlight and involve youth in educating their communities on wireless harms .
Youth can often reach communities more effectively by being inside them .
People @ @ @ @ @ @ @ classmate ’ s science project than happen upon a wireless safety manual .
Children and teenagers have opportunities to spread awareness from the ground up and reach the peers in ways adults can not .
We want to help children to make their voices heard and to encourage them to take a stance on this issue that affects their health and lives .
We encourage children to make their science project on this issue , to speak to their legislators and schools about the harms and to help those who have been injured @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Yousafzai said it best : “ I used to think I had to wait to be an adult to lead .
But I ’ ve learned that even a child ’ s voice can be heard around the world.
” If you are interested in helping me create change , please email Ysobel Gallo .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

David V. Goliath: An 11 y/o is on a Mission to Educate About 5G Harms and Protect his Mom
By: Ysobel Gallo, CHD’s EMF Child Ambassador Project
David, an 11-year-old from Idaho, first became aware of wireless harms through his mother Robin’s microwave sickness. What started out as headaches and nausea turned to vertigo and migraines until one day David found his mother lying on the floor in the midst of a heart attack. He was nine years old at the time.
After being rushed to the hospital, the cardiologist working with Robin assured the family that there was no problem and that Robin’s heart was very strong for her age. The family continued to see a string of other doctors who all said the same thing: “No problem.”
It was David’s father who first made the connection to wireless harms. An Air Force veteran, David’s father was working at the Dresden nuclear facility where he realized his wife’s symptoms matched signs of radiation sickness. Robin has since been officially diagnosed with microwave sickness by Dr. William Rea of the Environmental Health Center in Dallas, Texas.
The family hired an EMR mitigation professional who assessed their home and helped them remove the Wi-Fi, DECT cordless phones, and dirty electricity. But it wasn’t enough. At the time, the family was living between nine cell towers with a high power line a block away. Unable to live in such an EMR-saturated environment, the family moved into a steel storage unit in an industrial park, and later to the mountains of Idaho.
Unfortunately, 5G deployment was not far behind. 5G antennas entered their neighborhood this past December. Today there is a 5G antenna erected near either end of their trailer—and Robin’s symptoms are increasing again. Idaho’s 5G antennas use a frequency of 600MHz which can travel hundreds of square miles.
From the start, David has been his mother’s self-professed “greatest advocate.” His specialty is to frame mind-boggling concepts into a series of simple facts. In Illinois, he prepared a speech on wireless harms for his county’s 4-H competition on 5G and associated wireless harms. He also created a presentation board reviewing the book Radiation Nation by Daniel and Ryan DeBaun.
The response was disappointing to say the least. Although David came prepared with studies, books, and charts, only one family stopped by after his presentation to check out the materials. While he was awarded “1st Alternate,” the judges decided not to move David’s project to the state level because it was “too scary.”
Since then, David has continued to actively raise awareness of wireless harms. In Minnesota, he gave a presentation with Dafna Tachover, CHD’s Director of 5G and Wireless Harms Project. More recently, David has spoken against 5G to Bonner County’s Republican Central Committee as well as Sandpoint’s mayor, Shelby Rognstad.
“What I find most surprising about the 5G crisis is that industry-sponsored studies show the technology to be safe,” says David, “while independent studies of 5G show clear proof of harm.”
When asked what his goals are in this area, David says,
“Finding a place to live and building a home. That’s the main goal for me and my family right now.”
David’s 4-H speech follows…
••••
You, Me, and 5G
How many of you have a smart home? If you do it is an unhealthy home. What if I told you ALL biological life here on Earth is in danger and that this danger is something you cannot see, hear, taste or feel unless you’ve become sensitive to it? Have any of you wondered about the massive die-off of the world’s bee population? Our world has had one significant change that I would like to mention, and it has occurred within the last 125 years, that change is man-made radiation from electricity. From your cell phone to nuclear subs, radiation is permeating our planet affecting ALL biological life and the accumulative effects will continue to cause harm with the introduction of 5G. You may ask, “What is 5G?” To put it bluntly, 5G is solely for the purpose of machines, not biological beings. Those who sing its praise say it will usher in a new age for the Internet of Things, or IOT by connecting all wireless devices. This Internet of THINGS, NOT BEINGS, should give us pause because it is being deployed without the public’s knowledge, and its implementation is going against the proven warnings from doctors and scientists alike worldwide whose main concern is the damage to our health from the accumulated exposure to this radiation. The people who push 5G care about money and control. Consider this fact: 5G has NOT been shown to be safe, but then again 4G, 3G, 2G, our smart meters, and cell phones haven’t been proven safe either. In fact, quite the opposite! Think about the hundreds of thousands of deaths from smoking, asbestos, mercury, PCBs and lead paint all said to be safe at one time. Unlike smoking, there is no way you can get away from the radiation we are being exposed to daily. Some say 5G will be great, but for who? Are we just going to take THEIR word for it? Scientists have shown that there is extensive cellular damage from microwave radiation at levels far lower than what it takes to heat tissue. We are surrounded by radiation in and outside of our homes from baby monitors to cell towers, even our cars are drowning us in damaging radiation. 5G will put millions of radiation-emitting cells on our buildings, bus stops, and street lights. These mini cell towers will even be put in our front yards! Would you want this in front of your home? A newly published study out of Israel clearly shows 5G frequencies will affect all biological beings. In 2017, more than 180 doctors and scientists from 35 countries around the world presented a scientific appeal stating the deadly effects from this radiation. It has been scientifically proven repeatedly that there is a link between wireless radiation and a host of serious illness. Unfortunately, people who start to succumb to the effects are often misdiagnosed; in many cases, their symptoms are deemed hereditary when it could clearly be shown to be environmental. We are all different and because of this our symptoms are also. Look at Lyme disease to see how varied the reactions are, so to with radiation. For some it may simply start as headaches and or fatigue, for others it may be ADHD, but as the gradual accumulation of radiation continues, the individual symptoms will become more pronounced and health issues pile on top of what your body is already expressing. At some point, all those symptoms could become life threatening. Each and every one of you sitting here today is being affected, right here, right now. So the question I would like to leave you with is this: What are you going to do about it? Thank you.
••••
CHD’s EMF Child Ambassador Program aim is to both highlight and involve youth in educating their communities on wireless harms. Youth can often reach communities more effectively by being inside them. People are more likely to learn about a classmate’s science project than happen upon a wireless safety manual. Children and teenagers have opportunities to spread awareness from the ground up and reach the peers in ways adults cannot. We want to help children to make their voices heard and to encourage them to take a stance on this issue that affects their health and lives. We encourage children to make their science project on this issue, to speak to their legislators and schools about the harms and to help those who have been injured already and share their stories. Malala Yousafzai said it best: “I used to think I had to wait to be an adult to lead. But I’ve learned that even a child’s voice can be heard around the world.” If you are interested in helping me create change, please email Ysobel Gallo.
••••
Please consider supporting CHD’s landmark FCC case by making a donation at Children’s Health Defense – About Us – Donate (Please select 5G at the drop-down menu).
••••
TLB Editors Note: This is World Mercury Project on steroids! TLB highly recommends you click on the image below, visit this great website, and do whatever you can to help see this vital forum succeed … for the sake of our children !!! Please take the time to Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.
••••
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.