thelibertybeacon--2020-10-20--Is This Leaked Info Really Trudeau’s COVID Plan for 2021? You decide …

I want to provide you some very important information .
I ’ m a committee member within the Liberal Party of Canada .
I sit within several committee groups but the information I am providing is originating from the Strategic Planning committee ( which is steered by the PMO ) .
I need to start off by saying that I ’ m not happy doing this but I have to .
As a Canadian and more importantly as a parent who wants a better future not only for my children but for other children as well .
The other reason @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 30 % of the committee members are not pleased with the direction this will take Canada , but our opinions have been ignored and they plan on moving forward toward their goals .
They have also made it very clear that nothing will stop the planned outcomes .
The road map and aim was set out by the PMO and is as follows : – Phase in secondary lock down restrictions on a rolling basis , starting with major metropolitan areas first and expanding outward .
Expected by November 2020 .
– Rush @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) isolation facilities across every province and territory .
Expected by December 2020 .
– Daily new cases of COVID-19 will surge beyond capacity of testing , including increases in COVID related deaths following the same growth curves .
Expected by end of November 2020 .
– Complete and total secondary lock down ( much stricter than the first and second rolling phase restrictions ) .
Expected by end of December 2020 – early January 2021 – Reform and expansion of the unemployment program to be transitioned into the universal basic income program @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Projected COVID-19 mutation and/or co-infection with secondary virus ( referred to as COVID-21 ) leading to a third wave with much higher mortality rate and higher rate of infection .
Expected by February 2021 .
– Daily new cases of COVID-21 hospitalizations and COVID-19 and COVID-21 related deaths will exceed medical care facilities capacity .
Expected Q1 – Q2 2021 .
– Enhanced lock down restrictions ( referred to as Third Lock Down ) will be implemented .
Full travel restrictions will be imposed ( including inter-province and inter-city ) .
Expected Q2 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the universal basic income program .
Expected mid Q2 2021 .
– Projected supply chain break downs , inventory shortages , large economic instability .
Expected late Q2 2021 .
– Deployment of military personnel into major metropolitan areas as well as all major roadways to establish travel checkpoints .
Restrict travel and movement .
Provide logistical support to the area .
Expected by Q3 2021 .
Along with that provided road map , the Strategic Planning committee was asked to design an effective way of transitioning Canadians to meet an unprecedented economic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ face of Canada and forever alter the lives of Canadians .
What we were told was that in order to offset what was essentially an economic collapse on a international scale , that the federal government was going to offer Canadians a total debt relief .
This is how it works : the federal government will offer to eliminate all personal debts ( mortgages , loans , credit cards , etc ) which all funding will be provided to Canada by the IMF under what will become known as the World Debt Reset @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this total debt forgiveness the individual would forfeit ownership of any and all property and assets forever .
The individual would also have to agree to partake in the COVID-19 and COVID-21 vaccination schedule , which would provide the individual with unrestricted travel and unrestricted living even under a full lock down ( through the use of photo identification referred to as Canada ’ s HealthPass ) .
Committee members asked who would become the owner of the forfeited property and assets in that scenario and what would happen to lenders or financial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the World Debt Reset program will handle all of the details ” .
Several committee members also questioned what would happen to individuals if they refused to participate in the World Debt Reset program , or the HealthPass , or the vaccination schedule , and the answer we got was very troubling .
Essentially we were told it was our duty to make sure we came up with a plan to ensure that would never happen .
We were told it was in the individuals best interest to participate .
When several committee @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , we were told that those who refused would first live under the lock down restrictions indefinitely .
And that over a short period of time as more Canadians transitioned into the debt forgiveness program , the ones who refused to participate would be deemed a public safety risk and would be relocated into isolation facilities .
Once in those facilities they would be given two options : participate in the debt forgiveness program and be released , or stay indefinitely in the isolation facility under the classification of a serious public health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
So as you can imagine , after hearing all of this it turned into quite the heated discussion and escalated beyond anything I ’ ve ever witnessed before .
In the end it was implied by the PMO that the whole agenda will move forward no matter who agrees with it or not .
That it won ’ t just be Canada but in fact all nations will have similar roadmaps and agendas .
That we need to take advantage of the situations before us to promote change on a grander scale @ @ @ @ @ @ @ members who were opposed and ones who brought up key issues that would arise from such a thing were completely ignored .
Our opinions and concerns were ignored .
We were simply told to just do it .
All I know is that I don ’ t like it and I think its going to place Canadians into a dark future .

Fw: LPC Strategic Committee LeakInboxLPC leaker < [email protected] >1:47 PM (7 hours ago)
Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Saturday, October 10, 2020 1:38 PM, REMOVED wrote:
.
Dear REMOVED,
.
I want to provide you some very important information. I’m a committee member within the Liberal Party of Canada. I sit within several committee groups but the information I am providing is originating from the Strategic Planning committee (which is steered by the PMO).
.
I need to start off by saying that I’m not happy doing this but I have to. As a Canadian and more importantly as a parent who wants a better future not only for my children but for other children as well. The other reason I am doing this is because roughly 30% of the committee members are not pleased with the direction this will take Canada, but our opinions have been ignored and they plan on moving forward toward their goals. They have also made it very clear that nothing will stop the planned outcomes.
.
The road map and aim was set out by the PMO and is as follows:
.
– Phase in secondary lock down restrictions on a rolling basis, starting with major metropolitan areas first and expanding outward. Expected by November 2020.
– Rush the acquisition of (or construction of) isolation facilities across every province and territory. Expected by December 2020.
– Daily new cases of COVID-19 will surge beyond capacity of testing, including increases in COVID related deaths following the same growth curves. Expected by end of November 2020.
– Complete and total secondary lock down (much stricter than the first and second rolling phase restrictions). Expected by end of December 2020 – early January 2021
– Reform and expansion of the unemployment program to be transitioned into the universal basic income program. Expected by Q1 2021.
– Projected COVID-19 mutation and/or co-infection with secondary virus (referred to as COVID-21) leading to a third wave with much higher mortality rate and higher rate of infection. Expected by February 2021.
– Daily new cases of COVID-21 hospitalizations and COVID-19 and COVID-21 related deaths will exceed medical care facilities capacity. Expected Q1 – Q2 2021.
– Enhanced lock down restrictions (referred to as Third Lock Down) will be implemented. Full travel restrictions will be imposed (including inter-province and inter-city). Expected Q2 2021.
– Transitioning of individuals into the universal basic income program. Expected mid Q2 2021.
– Projected supply chain break downs, inventory shortages, large economic instability. Expected late Q2 2021.
– Deployment of military personnel into major metropolitan areas as well as all major roadways to establish travel checkpoints. Restrict travel and movement. Provide logistical support to the area. Expected by Q3 2021.
.
Along with that provided road map, the Strategic Planning committee was asked to design an effective way of transitioning Canadians to meet an unprecedented economic endeavor. One that would change the face of Canada and forever alter the lives of Canadians. What we were told was that in order to offset what was essentially an economic collapse on a international scale, that the federal government was going to offer Canadians a total debt relief. This is how it works: the federal government will offer to eliminate all personal debts (mortgages, loans, credit cards, etc) which all funding will be provided to Canada by the IMF under what will become known as the World Debt Reset program. In exchange for acceptance of this total debt forgiveness the individual would forfeit ownership of any and all property and assets forever. The individual would also have to agree to partake in the COVID-19 and COVID-21 vaccination schedule, which would provide the individual with unrestricted travel and unrestricted living even under a full lock down (through the use of photo identification referred to as Canada’s HealthPass).
.
Committee members asked who would become the owner of the forfeited property and assets in that scenario and what would happen to lenders or financial institutions, we were simply told “the World Debt Reset program will handle all of the details”. Several committee members also questioned what would happen to individuals if they refused to participate in the World Debt Reset program, or the HealthPass, or the vaccination schedule, and the answer we got was very troubling. Essentially we were told it was our duty to make sure we came up with a plan to ensure that would never happen. We were told it was in the individuals best interest to participate. When several committee members pushed relentlessly to get an answer, we were told that those who refused would first live under the lock down restrictions indefinitely. And that over a short period of time as more Canadians transitioned into the debt forgiveness program, the ones who refused to participate would be deemed a public safety risk and would be relocated into isolation facilities. Once in those facilities they would be given two options: participate in the debt forgiveness program and be released, or stay indefinitely in the isolation facility under the classification of a serious public health risk and have all their assets seized.
.
So as you can imagine, after hearing all of this it turned into quite the heated discussion and escalated beyond anything I’ve ever witnessed before. In the end it was implied by the PMO that the whole agenda will move forward no matter who agrees with it or not. That it won’t just be Canada but in fact all nations will have similar roadmaps and agendas. That we need to take advantage of the situations before us to promote change on a grander scale for the betterment of everyone. The members who were opposed and ones who brought up key issues that would arise from such a thing were completely ignored. Our opinions and concerns were ignored. We were simply told to just do it.
All I know is that I don’t like it and I think its going to place Canadians into a dark future.


thelibertybeacon--2020-10-20--Google And Oracle Will Track The Vaccinated With ‘Incredibly Precise’ Tech

Moncef Slaoui , the official head of Operation Warp Speed , told the Wall Street Journal last week that all Warp Speed vaccine recipients in the US will be monitored by “ incredibly precise .
.
.
tracking systems ” for up to two years and that tech giants Google and Oracle would be involved .
Last week , a rare media interview given by the Trump administration ’ s “ Vaccine Czar ” offered a brief glimpse into the inner workings of the extremely secretive Operation Warp Speed ( OWS ) , the Trump administration ’ s “ public-private @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to 300 million Americans by next January .
What was revealed should deeply unsettle all Americans .
During an interview with the Wall Street Journal published last Friday , the “ captain ” of Operation Warp Speed , career Big Pharma executive Moncef Slaoui , confirmed that the millions of Americans who are set to receive the project ’ s Covid-19 vaccine will be monitored via “ incredibly precise .
.
.
tracking systems ” that will “ ensure that patients each get two doses of the same vaccine and to monitor them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ noted that tech giants Google and Oracle have been contracted as part of this “ tracking system ” but did not specify their exact roles beyond helping to “ collect and track vaccine data.
” The day before the Wall Street Journal interview was published , the New York Times published a separate interview with Slaoui where he referred to this “ tracking system ” as a “ very active pharmacovigilance surveillance system.
” During a previous interview with the journal Science in early September , Slaoui had referred to this system only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” that would “ make sure that when the vaccines are introduced that we ’ ll absolutely continue to assess their safety.
” Slaoui has only recently tacked on the words “ tracking ” and “ surveillance ” to his description of this system during his relatively rare media interviews .
While Slaoui himself was short on specifics regarding this “ pharmacovigilance surveillance system , ” the few official documents from Operation Warp Speed that have been publicly released offer some details about what this system may look like and how long it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vital signs and whereabouts of Americans who receive a Warp Speed vaccine .
Two official OWS documents released in mid-September state that vaccine recipients—expected to include a majority of the US population—would be monitored for twenty-four months after the first dose of a Covid-19 vaccine is administered and that this would be done by a “ pharmacovigilance system.
” In the OWS document entitled “ From the Factory to the Frontlines , ” the Department of Health and Human Services ( HHS ) and the Department of Defense ( DOD ) stated that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ new unlicensed vaccine production methods that “ have limited previous data on safety in humans .
.
.
the long-term safety of these vaccines will be carefully assessed using pharmacovigilance surveillance and Phase 4 ( post-licensure ) clinical trials.
” In addition , Moncef Slaoui and OWS ’ s vaccine coordinator , Matt Hepburn , formerly a program manager at the Pentagon ’ s controversial Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency ( DARPA ) , had previously published an article in the New England Journal of Medicine that stated that “ because some technologies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ humans , the long-term safety of these vaccines will be carefully assessed using pharmacovigilance surveillance strategies.
” The use of pharmacovigilance on those who receive the vaccine is also mentioned in the official Warp Speed “ infographic , ” which states that monitoring will be done in cooperation with the Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) and the Centers for Disease Control and Protection ( CDC ) and will involve “ 24 month post-trial monitoring for adverse effects.
” In a separate part of that same document , OWS describes one of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ traceability , ” which has three goals : to “ confirm which of the approved vaccines were administered regardless of location ( private/public ) ” ; to send a “ reminder to return for second dose ” ; and to “ administer the correct second dose.
” Regarding a Covid-19 vaccine requiring more than one dose , a CDC document associated with Operation Warp Speed states : The CDC document also references a document published in August by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security , associated with the Event 201 and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Covid-19 vaccination strategy .
The Johns Hopkins paper , which counts Dark Winter co-organizer Thomas Inglesby as one of its authors , argues that existing “ passive reporting ” systems managed by the CDC and FDA should be retooled to create “ an active safety surveillance system directed by the CDC that monitors all [ Covid-19 ] vaccine recipients—perhaps by short message service or other electronic mechanisms.
” Despite the claims in these documents that the “ pharmacovigilance surveillance system ” would intimately involve the FDA , top FDA officials stated in September @ @ @ @ @ @ @ meetings and told reporters they could not explain the operation ’ s organization or when or with what frequency its leadership meets .
The FDA officials did state , however , that they “ are still allowed to interact with companies developing products for OWS , ” STAT news reported .
In addition , the FDA has apparently “ set up a firewall between the vast majority of staff and the initiative [ Operation Warp Speed ] ” that appears to drastically limit the number of FDA officials with any knowledge of or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s director of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research , Janet Woodcock , is the only FDA official listed as having any direct involvement in OWS and appears to be personally managing this “ firewall ” at the FDA .
Woodcock describes herself as a long-time advocate for the use of “ big data ” in the evaluation of drug and vaccine safety and has been intimately involved in FDA precursors to the coming Warp Speed “ pharmacovigilance surveillance system ” known as Sentinel and PRISM , both of which are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is currently on a temporary leave of absence from her role as the director of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research , which allows her to focus her complete attention on overseeing aspects of Operation Warp Speed on behalf of the FDA ’ s Office of the Commissioner .
Her temporary replacement at the FDA , Patrizia Cavazzoni , is “ very aligned with Janet and where the agency is going , ” according to media reports .
Cavazzoni is a former executive at Pfizer , one of the companies producing a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ set to begin testing in children as young as 12 years old .
The extreme secrecy of Operation Warp Speed has affected not only the FDA but also the CDC , as a CDC expert panel normally involved in developing the government ’ s vaccine distribution strategies was “ stonewalled ” by Matt Hepburn , OWS ’ s vaccine coordinator , who bluntly refused to answer several of the panel ’ s “ pointed questions ” about the highly secretive operation .
While Moncef Slaoui and Warp Speed documents provide few details regarding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ entail , Slaoui did note in his recent interview with the Wall Street Journal that tech giants Google and Oracle had been contracted to “ collect and track vaccine data ” as part of this system .
Neither Google nor Oracle , however , has announced receipt of a contract related to Operation Warp Speed , and the DOD and HHS , similarly , have yet to announce the awarding of any Warp Speed contract to either Google or Oracle .
In addition , searches on the US government ’ s Federal Register @ @ @ @ @ @ @ awarded contracts came up empty for any contract awarded to Google or Oracle that would apply to any such “ pharmacovigilance ” system or any other aspect of Operation Warp Speed .
Given my previous reporting on the use of a nongovernment intermediary for awarding OWS contracts to vaccine companies , it seems likely that Warp Speed contracts awarded to Google and Oracle were made using a similar mechanism .
In an October 6 , 2020 , report for The Last American Vagabond , I noted that $ 6 billion in Warp Speed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ through Advanced Technology International ( ATI ) , a government contractor that works mainly with the military and surveillance technology companies and whose parent company has strong ties to the CIA and the 2001 Dark Winter simulation .
HHS , which is supposedly overseeing Operation Warp Speed , claimed to have “ no record ” of at least one of those contracts .
Only one Warp Speed vaccine contract , which did not involve ATI and was awarded directly by HHS ’ s Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority , was recently obtained @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the contract , however , including the section on intellectual property rights , were redacted in their entirety .
If the Warp Speed contracts that have been awarded to Google and Oracle are anything like the Warp Speed contracts awarded to most of its participating vaccine companies , then those contracts grant those companies diminished federal oversight and exemptions from federal laws and regulations designed to protect taxpayer interests in the pursuit of the work stipulated in the contract .
It also makes them essentially immune to Freedom of Information Act ( FOIA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the unacknowledged Google and Oracle contracts , vaccine companies have publicly disclosed that they received OWS contracts , just not the terms or details of those contracts .
This suggests that the Google and Oracle contracts are even more secretive .
A major conflict of interest worth noting is Google ’ s ownership of YouTube , which recently banned on its massive multimedia platform all “ misinformation ” related to concerns about a future Covid-19 vaccine .
With Google now formally part of Operation Warp Speed , it seems likely that any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the conflicts of interest of many of its members ( particularly Moncef Slaoui and Matt Hepburn ) as well as any concerns about Warp Speed vaccine safety , allocation and/or distribution may be labeled “ Covid-19 vaccine misinformation ” and removed from YouTube .
From the NSA to the FDA : The New PRISM Though the nature of this coming surveillance system for Covid-19 vaccine recipients has yet to be fully detailed by Warp Speed or the tech companies the operation has contracted , OWS documents and existing infrastructure at the FDA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ system could entail .
For instance , the Warp Speed document “ From the Factory to the Frontlines ” notes that the pharmacovigilance system will be a new system created exclusively for OWS that will be “ buil [ t ] off of existing IT [ information technology ] infrastructure ” and will fill any “ gaps with new IT solutions.
” It then notes that “ the Covid-19 vaccination program requires significant enhancement of the IT that will support enhancements and data exchange that are critical for a multi-dose candidate to ensure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” The document also states that all data related to the OWS vaccine distribution effort “ will be reported into a common IT infrastructure that will support analysis and reporting , ” adding that this “ IT infrastructure will support partners with a broad range of tools for record-keeping , data on who is being vaccinated , and reminders for second doses.
” Though some Warp Speed documents hint as to the existing IT systems that will serve as the foundation for this new tracking system , arguably the most likely candidate is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ established in 2009 during the H1N1 Swine flu pandemic .
Like Operation Warp Speed itself , Sentinel is a public-private partnership and involves the FDA , private business , and academia .
According to its website , Sentinel ’ s “ main goal is to improve how FDA evaluates the safety and performance of medical products ” through big data , with an additional focus on “ learning more about potential side effects.
” Media reports describe Sentinel as “ an electronic surveillance system that aggregates data from electronic medical records , claims @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the agency to track the safety of marketed drugs , biologics and medical devices.
” One of Sentinel ’ s main proponent at the FDA is Janet Woodcock , who has aggressively worked to expand the program as director of the FDA ’ s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research , with a focus on Sentinel ’ s use in “ post-market effectiveness studies.
” As previously mentioned , Woodcock is the only FDA official listed among the ninety or so “ leaders ” of OWS , most of whom are part of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or vaccine-production experience .
Woodcock ’ s temporary replacement at the FDA , Patrizia Cavazzoni , is also very active in efforts to expand Sentinel .
STAT news reported earlier this year that Cavazzoni previously “ served on the sterling committee of I-MEDS , an FDA-industry partnership which allows drug makers to pay for use of the FDA ’ s real-world data system known as Sentinel to complete certain safety studies more quickly.
” Sentinel has a series of “ collaborating partners ” that “ provide healthcare data and scientific , technical , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
These collaborating partners include intelligence contractor Booz Allen Hamilton , tech giant IBM , and major US health insurance companies such as Aetna and Blue Cross Blue Shield , among many others .
In addition , Sentinel ’ s Innovation Center , which it describes as the program ’ s “ test bed to identify , develop , and evaluate innovative methods , ” is partnered with Amazon , General Dynamics , and Microsoft .
Sentinel also has a Community Building and Outreach Center , which is managed by Deloitte consulting , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the world that is known for seeking to fill its ranks with former CIA officials .
The Sentinel system ’ s specific surveillance program aimed at monitoring vaccine effectiveness is known as the Post-licensure Rapid Immunization Safety Monitoring Program , better known as PRISM .
Sentinel ’ s PRISM was “ developed to monitor vaccine safety , but [ to date ] has never been used to assess vaccine effectiveness.
” PRISM was initially launched alongside the Sentinel Initiative itself in 2009 “ in response to the need to monitor the safety of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was licensed , marketed , and administered .
Yet , as previously mentioned , PRISM has yet to be used to assess the effectiveness of any vaccine while quietly expanding for nearly a decade , which implies that the stakeholders in the Sentinel Initiative have a plan to implement this “ safety surveillance system ” at some point .
The name PRISM may remind readers of the National Security Agency ( NSA ) program of the same name that became well known throughout the United States following the Edward Snowden revelations .
Given @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the NSA , as well as the Department of Homeland Security ( DHS ) , are now officially part of Operation Warp Speed and appear to be playing a role in the development of Warp Speed ’ s “ pharmacovigilance surveillance system.
” The addition of the NSA and the DHS to the initiative , of course , greatly increases the involvement of US intelligence agencies in the operation , which itself is “ dominated ” by the military and sorely lacking in civilian public health officials .
CyberScoop first reported in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s Cybersecurity Directorate were involved in Operation Warp Speed , with their role—as well as that of DHS—being framed mainly as offering “ cybersecurity advice ” to the initiative .
However , the NSA and DHS are also offering “ guidance ” and “ services ” to both the other federal agencies involved in Warp Speed as well as OWS contractors , which now include Google and Oracle .
Google is well known for its cozy relationship with the NSA , including its PRISM program , and they have also backed NSA-supported @ @ @ @ @ @ @ surveil Americans without a warrant .
Similarly , Oracle is a longtime NSA contractor and also has ties to the CIA dating back to its earliest days as a company , not unlike Google .
Notably , Oracle and Google remain locked in a major legal battle over copyright issues that is set to be heard by the Supreme Court in the coming weeks and is expected to have major ramifications for the tech industry .
In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks , the US military attempted to institute a surveillance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just months after its creation due to public outrage .
Known as Total Information Awareness ( TIA ) , the program sought to develop an all-seeing surveillance apparatus managed by the Pentagon ’ s DARPA and officially argued that invasive surveillance of the entire US population was necessary to prevent terrorist attacks , bioterrorism events , and even naturally occurring disease outbreaks before they could take place .
Before it was disbanded , TIA Americans ’ medical records ; fingerprints ; gait , facial , and iris biometric data ; drug prescriptions ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , travel , and media-consumption habits .
TIA , not unlike Operation Warp Speed , was a “ public-private partnership ” managed by the DOD and the NSA , the CIA , and other intelligence agencies as well as the private sector and academia .
Also like Warp Speed , TIA officially justified its invasive surveillance goals by claiming that its initiatives would rescue Americans from the “ invisible enemy ” of faceless terrorists abroad and ensure citizens ’ safety , security , and health .
Today , Warp Speed officially takes aim @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enemy ” —a microbe invisible to the naked human eye .
In the years after 9/11 , the public pushback against TIA was fierce .
The American Civil Liberties Union ( ACLU ) claimed at the time that the surveillance effort would “ kill privacy in America ” because “ every aspect of our lives would be catalogued , ” while mainstream media outlets warned that TIA was “ fighting terror by terrifying U.S. citizens.
” Despite Congress officially defunding the program , it later emerged that TIA was never actually shut down @ @ @ @ @ @ @ covertly divided among the web of military and intelligence agencies that comprise the US national security state .
Unlike in years past , TIA ’ s apparent successor , Operation Warp Speed , has received no pushback from mainstream media outlets or advocacy organizations , with many of these same entities now placing blind faith in the secretive initiative and lionizing it as the “ only way ” to resolve the Covid-19 pandemic crisis .
The national security state has carefully learned from and studied its past failures , while many Americans , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trust in the very agencies and government entities that have lied the country into multiple wars , tortured and maimed countless civilians abroad , produced a series of failed states in order to plunder their resources , and are currently facilitating the pillaging of the American economy by Wall Street and the Federal Reserve under the guise of “ relief.
” Allowing these same entities to surveil and track a majority of Americans and to use the country ’ s population as guinea pigs for unlicensed , understudied , and experimental vaccine technologies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ At the same time , it would also enable a surveillance panopticon so dystopian and far reaching that Americans stand to lose not only their few remaining civil liberties but even sovereignty over their own bodies .
The total-surveillance agenda that began with TIA and that has been resurrected through Warp Speed predated Covid-19 by decades .
Its architects and proponents have worked to justify these extreme and invasive surveillance programs by marketing this agenda as the “ solution ” to whatever Americans are most afraid of at any given time .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public health ” and everything to do with total control .
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com

******** WHITNEY WEBB
Moncef Slaoui, the official head of Operation Warp Speed, told the Wall Street Journal last week that all Warp Speed vaccine recipients in the US will be monitored by “incredibly precise . . . tracking systems” for up to two years and that tech giants Google and Oracle would be involved.
Last week, a rare media interview given by the Trump administration’s “Vaccine Czar” offered a brief glimpse into the inner workings of the extremely secretive Operation Warp Speed (OWS), the Trump administration’s “public-private partnership” for delivering a Covid-19 vaccine to 300 million Americans by next January. What was revealed should deeply unsettle all Americans.
During an interview with the Wall Street Journal published last Friday, the “captain” of Operation Warp Speed, career Big Pharma executive Moncef Slaoui, confirmed that the millions of Americans who are set to receive the project’s Covid-19 vaccine will be monitored via “incredibly precise . . . tracking systems” that will “ensure that patients each get two doses of the same vaccine and to monitor them for adverse health effects.” Slaoui also noted that tech giants Google and Oracle have been contracted as part of this “tracking system” but did not specify their exact roles beyond helping to “collect and track vaccine data.”
The day before the Wall Street Journal interview was published, the New York Times published a separate interview with Slaoui where he referred to this “tracking system” as a “very active pharmacovigilance surveillance system.” During a previous interview with the journal Science in early September, Slaoui had referred to this system only as “a very active pharmacovigilance system” that would “make sure that when the vaccines are introduced that we’ll absolutely continue to assess their safety.” Slaoui has only recently tacked on the words “tracking” and “surveillance” to his description of this system during his relatively rare media interviews.
While Slaoui himself was short on specifics regarding this “pharmacovigilance surveillance system,” the few official documents from Operation Warp Speed that have been publicly released offer some details about what this system may look like and how long it is expected to “track” the vital signs and whereabouts of Americans who receive a Warp Speed vaccine.
The Pharmacovigilantes
Two official OWS documents released in mid-September state that vaccine recipients—expected to include a majority of the US population—would be monitored for twenty-four months after the first dose of a Covid-19 vaccine is administered and that this would be done by a “pharmacovigilance system.”
In the OWS document entitled “From the Factory to the Frontlines,” the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Department of Defense (DOD) stated that, because Warp Speed vaccine candidates use new unlicensed vaccine production methods that “have limited previous data on safety in humans . . . the long-term safety of these vaccines will be carefully assessed using pharmacovigilance surveillance and Phase 4 (post-licensure) clinical trials.”
It continues:
The key objective of pharmacovigilance is to determine each vaccine’s performance in real-life scenarios, to study efficacy, and to discover any infrequent and rare side effects not identified in clinical trials. OWS will also use pharmacovigilance analytics, which serves as one of the instruments for the continuous monitoring of pharmacovigilance data. Robust analytical tools will be used to leverage large amounts of data and the benefits of using such data across the value chain, including regulatory obligations.
In addition, Moncef Slaoui and OWS’s vaccine coordinator, Matt Hepburn, formerly a program manager at the Pentagon’s controversial Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), had previously published an article in the New England Journal of Medicine that stated that “because some technologies have limited previous data on safety in humans, the long-term safety of these vaccines will be carefully assessed using pharmacovigilance surveillance strategies.”
The use of pharmacovigilance on those who receive the vaccine is also mentioned in the official Warp Speed “infographic,” which states that monitoring will be done in cooperation with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Protection (CDC) and will involve “24 month post-trial monitoring for adverse effects.”
In a separate part of that same document, OWS describes one of its “four key tenets” as “traceability,” which has three goals: to “confirm which of the approved vaccines were administered regardless of location (private/public)”; to send a “reminder to return for second dose”; and to “administer the correct second dose.”
Regarding a Covid-19 vaccine requiring more than one dose, a CDC document associated with Operation Warp Speed states:
For most Covid-19 vaccine products, two doses of vaccine, separated by 21 or 28 days, will be needed. Because different Covid-19 vaccine products will not be interchangeable, a vaccine recipient’s second dose must be from the same manufacturer as their first dose. Second-dose reminders for vaccine recipients will be critical to ensure compliance with vaccine dosing intervals and achieve optimal vaccine effectiveness.
The CDC document also references a document published in August by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, associated with the Event 201 and Dark Winter simulations, as informing its Covid-19 vaccination strategy. The Johns Hopkins paper, which counts Dark Winter co-organizer Thomas Inglesby as one of its authors, argues that existing “passive reporting” systems managed by the CDC and FDA should be retooled to create “an active safety surveillance system directed by the CDC that monitors all [Covid-19] vaccine recipients—perhaps by short message service or other electronic mechanisms.”
Despite the claims in these documents that the “pharmacovigilance surveillance system” would intimately involve the FDA, top FDA officials stated in September that they were barred from attending OWS meetings and told reporters they could not explain the operation’s organization or when or with what frequency its leadership meets. The FDA officials did state, however, that they “are still allowed to interact with companies developing products for OWS,” STAT news reported.
In addition, the FDA has apparently “set up a firewall between the vast majority of staff and the initiative [Operation Warp Speed]” that appears to drastically limit the number of FDA officials with any knowledge of or involvement in Warp Speed. The FDA’s director of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Janet Woodcock, is the only FDA official listed as having any direct involvement in OWS and appears to be personally managing this “firewall” at the FDA. Woodcock describes herself as a long-time advocate for the use of “big data” in the evaluation of drug and vaccine safety and has been intimately involved in FDA precursors to the coming Warp Speed “pharmacovigilance surveillance system” known as Sentinel and PRISM, both of which are discussed later in this report.
Woodcock is currently on a temporary leave of absence from her role as the director of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, which allows her to focus her complete attention on overseeing aspects of Operation Warp Speed on behalf of the FDA’s Office of the Commissioner. Her temporary replacement at the FDA, Patrizia Cavazzoni, is “very aligned with Janet and where the agency is going,” according to media reports. Cavazzoni is a former executive at Pfizer, one of the companies producing a vaccine for OWS. That vaccine is set to begin testing in children as young as 12 years old.
The extreme secrecy of Operation Warp Speed has affected not only the FDA but also the CDC, as a CDC expert panel normally involved in developing the government’s vaccine distribution strategies was “stonewalled” by Matt Hepburn, OWS’s vaccine coordinator, who bluntly refused to answer several of the panel’s “pointed questions” about the highly secretive operation.
More Secret Contracts
While Moncef Slaoui and Warp Speed documents provide few details regarding what this “tracking system” would entail, Slaoui did note in his recent interview with the Wall Street Journal that tech giants Google and Oracle had been contracted to “collect and track vaccine data” as part of this system. Neither Google nor Oracle, however, has announced receipt of a contract related to Operation Warp Speed, and the DOD and HHS, similarly, have yet to announce the awarding of any Warp Speed contract to either Google or Oracle. In addition, searches on the US government’s Federal Register and on the official website for federally awarded contracts came up empty for any contract awarded to Google or Oracle that would apply to any such “pharmacovigilance” system or any other aspect of Operation Warp Speed.
Given my previous reporting on the use of a nongovernment intermediary for awarding OWS contracts to vaccine companies, it seems likely that Warp Speed contracts awarded to Google and Oracle were made using a similar mechanism. In an October 6, 2020, report for The Last American Vagabond, I noted that $6 billion in Warp Speed contracts awarded to vaccine companies were made through Advanced Technology International (ATI), a government contractor that works mainly with the military and surveillance technology companies and whose parent company has strong ties to the CIA and the 2001 Dark Winter simulation. HHS, which is supposedly overseeing Operation Warp Speed, claimed to have “no record” of at least one of those contracts. Only one Warp Speed vaccine contract, which did not involve ATI and was awarded directly by HHS’s Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, was recently obtained by KEI Online. Major parts of the contract, however, including the section on intellectual property rights, were redacted in their entirety.
If the Warp Speed contracts that have been awarded to Google and Oracle are anything like the Warp Speed contracts awarded to most of its participating vaccine companies, then those contracts grant those companies diminished federal oversight and exemptions from federal laws and regulations designed to protect taxpayer interests in the pursuit of the work stipulated in the contract. It also makes them essentially immune to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Yet, in contrast to the unacknowledged Google and Oracle contracts, vaccine companies have publicly disclosed that they received OWS contracts, just not the terms or details of those contracts. This suggests that the Google and Oracle contracts are even more secretive.
A major conflict of interest worth noting is Google’s ownership of YouTube, which recently banned on its massive multimedia platform all “misinformation” related to concerns about a future Covid-19 vaccine. With Google now formally part of Operation Warp Speed, it seems likely that any concerns about OWS’s extreme secrecy and the conflicts of interest of many of its members (particularly Moncef Slaoui and Matt Hepburn) as well as any concerns about Warp Speed vaccine safety, allocation and/or distribution may be labeled “Covid-19 vaccine misinformation” and removed from YouTube.
From the NSA to the FDA: The New PRISM
Though the nature of this coming surveillance system for Covid-19 vaccine recipients has yet to be fully detailed by Warp Speed or the tech companies the operation has contracted, OWS documents and existing infrastructure at the FDA offer a clue as to what this system could entail.
For instance, the Warp Speed document “From the Factory to the Frontlines” notes that the pharmacovigilance system will be a new system created exclusively for OWS that will be “buil[t] off of existing IT [information technology] infrastructure” and will fill any “gaps with new IT solutions.” It then notes that “the Covid-19 vaccination program requires significant enhancement of the IT that will support enhancements and data exchange that are critical for a multi-dose candidate to ensure proper administration of a potential second dose.” The document also states that all data related to the OWS vaccine distribution effort “will be reported into a common IT infrastructure that will support analysis and reporting,” adding that this “IT infrastructure will support partners with a broad range of tools for record-keeping, data on who is being vaccinated, and reminders for second doses.”
Though some Warp Speed documents hint as to the existing IT systems that will serve as the foundation for this new tracking system, arguably the most likely candidate is the FDA-managed Sentinel Initiative, which was established in 2009 during the H1N1 Swine flu pandemic. Like Operation Warp Speed itself, Sentinel is a public-private partnership and involves the FDA, private business, and academia.
According to its website, Sentinel’s “main goal is to improve how FDA evaluates the safety and performance of medical products” through big data, with an additional focus on “learning more about potential side effects.” Media reports describe Sentinel as “an electronic surveillance system that aggregates data from electronic medical records, claims and registries that voluntarily participate and allows the agency to track the safety of marketed drugs, biologics and medical devices.”
One of Sentinel’s main proponent at the FDA is Janet Woodcock, who has aggressively worked to expand the program as director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, with a focus on Sentinel’s use in “post-market effectiveness studies.” As previously mentioned, Woodcock is the only FDA official listed among the ninety or so “leaders” of OWS, most of whom are part of the US military and lack any health-care or vaccine-production experience.
Woodcock’s temporary replacement at the FDA, Patrizia Cavazzoni, is also very active in efforts to expand Sentinel. STAT news reported earlier this year that Cavazzoni previously “served on the sterling committee of I-MEDS, an FDA-industry partnership which allows drug makers to pay for use of the FDA’s real-world data system known as Sentinel to complete certain safety studies more quickly.”
Sentinel has a series of “collaborating partners” that “provide healthcare data and scientific, technical, and organizational expertise” to the initiative. These collaborating partners include intelligence contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, tech giant IBM, and major US health insurance companies such as Aetna and Blue Cross Blue Shield, among many others. In addition, Sentinel’s Innovation Center, which it describes as the program’s “test bed to identify, develop, and evaluate innovative methods,” is partnered with Amazon, General Dynamics, and Microsoft. Sentinel also has a Community Building and Outreach Center, which is managed by Deloitte consulting, one of the largest consultancy firms in the world that is known for seeking to fill its ranks with former CIA officials.
The Sentinel system’s specific surveillance program aimed at monitoring vaccine effectiveness is known as the Post-licensure Rapid Immunization Safety Monitoring Program, better known as PRISM. Sentinel’s PRISM was “developed to monitor vaccine safety, but [to date] has never been used to assess vaccine effectiveness.” PRISM was initially launched alongside the Sentinel Initiative itself in 2009 “in response to the need to monitor the safety of the H1N1 influenza vaccine” after it was licensed, marketed, and administered. Yet, as previously mentioned, PRISM has yet to be used to assess the effectiveness of any vaccine while quietly expanding for nearly a decade, which implies that the stakeholders in the Sentinel Initiative have a plan to implement this “safety surveillance system” at some point.
The name PRISM may remind readers of the National Security Agency (NSA) program of the same name that became well known throughout the United States following the Edward Snowden revelations. Given this association, it is worth noting that the NSA, as well as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), are now officially part of Operation Warp Speed and appear to be playing a role in the development of Warp Speed’s “pharmacovigilance surveillance system.” The addition of the NSA and the DHS to the initiative, of course, greatly increases the involvement of US intelligence agencies in the operation, which itself is “dominated” by the military and sorely lacking in civilian public health officials.
CyberScoop first reported in early September that members of the NSA’s Cybersecurity Directorate were involved in Operation Warp Speed, with their role—as well as that of DHS—being framed mainly as offering “cybersecurity advice” to the initiative. However, the NSA and DHS are also offering “guidance” and “services” to both the other federal agencies involved in Warp Speed as well as OWS contractors, which now include Google and Oracle.
Google is well known for its cozy relationship with the NSA, including its PRISM program, and they have also backed NSA-supported legislation that would make it easier to surveil Americans without a warrant. Similarly, Oracle is a longtime NSA contractor and also has ties to the CIA dating back to its earliest days as a company, not unlike Google. Notably, Oracle and Google remain locked in a major legal battle over copyright issues that is set to be heard by the Supreme Court in the coming weeks and is expected to have major ramifications for the tech industry.
The Public Health Panopticon
In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, the US military attempted to institute a surveillance program so invasive that Congress defunded it just months after its creation due to public outrage. Known as Total Information Awareness (TIA), the program sought to develop an all-seeing surveillance apparatus managed by the Pentagon’s DARPA and officially argued that invasive surveillance of the entire US population was necessary to prevent terrorist attacks, bioterrorism events, and even naturally occurring disease outbreaks before they could take place.
Before it was disbanded, TIA sought to collect Americans’ medical records; fingerprints; gait, facial, and iris biometric data; drug prescriptions; and even DNA in addition to citizens’ financial, travel, and media-consumption habits. TIA, not unlike Operation Warp Speed, was a “public-private partnership” managed by the DOD and partnered with the NSA, the CIA, and other intelligence agencies as well as the private sector and academia.
Also like Warp Speed, TIA officially justified its invasive surveillance goals by claiming that its initiatives would rescue Americans from the “invisible enemy” of faceless terrorists abroad and ensure citizens’ safety, security, and health. Today, Warp Speed officially takes aim at a new type of “invisible enemy”—a microbe invisible to the naked human eye.
In the years after 9/11, the public pushback against TIA was fierce. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) claimed at the time that the surveillance effort would “kill privacy in America” because “every aspect of our lives would be catalogued,” while mainstream media outlets warned that TIA was “fighting terror by terrifying U.S. citizens.” Despite Congress officially defunding the program, it later emerged that TIA was never actually shut down, with its various programs having been covertly divided among the web of military and intelligence agencies that comprise the US national security state.
Unlike in years past, TIA’s apparent successor, Operation Warp Speed, has received no pushback from mainstream media outlets or advocacy organizations, with many of these same entities now placing blind faith in the secretive initiative and lionizing it as the “only way” to resolve the Covid-19 pandemic crisis.
The national security state has carefully learned from and studied its past failures, while many Americans, in contrast, continue to place their trust in the very agencies and government entities that have lied the country into multiple wars, tortured and maimed countless civilians abroad, produced a series of failed states in order to plunder their resources, and are currently facilitating the pillaging of the American economy by Wall Street and the Federal Reserve under the guise of “relief.”
Allowing these same entities to surveil and track a majority of Americans and to use the country’s population as guinea pigs for unlicensed, understudied, and experimental vaccine technologies is a clear recipe for disaster. At the same time, it would also enable a surveillance panopticon so dystopian and far reaching that Americans stand to lose not only their few remaining civil liberties but even sovereignty over their own bodies.
The total-surveillance agenda that began with TIA and that has been resurrected through Warp Speed predated Covid-19 by decades. Its architects and proponents have worked to justify these extreme and invasive surveillance programs by marketing this agenda as the “solution” to whatever Americans are most afraid of at any given time. It has very little to do with “public health” and everything to do with total control.
Read full story here…
************
Source
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com


thelibertybeacon--2020-10-20--Great propaganda tricks of today: spinning a scare

The following article is from the Independent , which is owned by Russian oligarch Evgeny Lebedev ( Tory Party donor ) , Saudi Sultan Sultan Muhammad Abuljadaye and Justin Byam Shaw chum of the Tory party Chairman .
Coronavirus UK : Further 42 hospital deaths in England as total doubles compared to last week It provides a fantastic example of how the media play sly mind games that ( a ) try to scare the crap out of the reader yet ( b ) rely on the reader not reading the article properly .
As an exercise in coming to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ compare the scary , misleading headline with the ACTUAL DATA in the article .
Take a look that the article HERE and compare what it actually says with what the headline suggests .
The 42 deaths were over a 2 month period .
If you don ’ t read the article carefully you are likely to miss that point .
That is roughly EIGHT WEEKS , which means an average of just over 5 deaths per week ACROSS THE UK .
There are about 1250 hospitals in the UK , which means one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hospitals !
Put in that missing context , it is not so scary is it ?
You can not sell a scare that way .
But it gets even more silly .
Then read carefully what the article says about the deaths .
ALL of them were of people between 45 and 100 .
If you check the age distribution you will find that the vast majority were over 65 .
Only THREE of them had no underlying conditions .
When they say “ underlying conditions ” , they mean things like cancer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ person vulnerable to COVID and other bugs that are not killers on their own .
But they usually do not take into account other underlying conditions such as drug use , psych meds , severe vitamin D deficiencies , malnutrition , psychological factors and so forth .
So even the three that had “ no underlying conditions ” may actually have had conditions that enabled a natively non-fatal bug to become fatal in PERHAPS one , two or all of those three cases .
8 were recorded as C19 deaths without even being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ certain how many of these – IF ANY – were actually deaths where C19 was even present .
Of the remainder ( 31- roughly one death for every 400 UK hospitals ) these , we assume , tested positive for COVID19 .
But note another trick that throws in confusion and imprecision : the article sometimes refers to “ Coronavirus ” and sometimes , more specifically to C19 .
Coronavirus covers a family of viruses of which C19 is just one , So if you say a person tested positive for Coronavirus or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mean C19 , it could also mean the common cold or other viruses in that family .
It is worth bearing in mind that one thing that has characterised both the government ’ s and the media ’ s reporting of this “ pandemic ” to the people has been the vagueness or imprecision or inherent contradictions of the terms being used or the advice being given .
This chaos of information creates confusions and uncertainty , which makes the job of the propagandist intent upon giving events a particular spin , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this as a natural law of propaganda : clarity of communication and meaning is the enemy of effective lying This means that they tested positive within four weeks of their death .
It means that C19 was allegedly present when they died or had recently been present .
It does not NECESSARILY mean that C19 killed them , only that it was present .
All those people had underlying conditions .
C19 was allegedly present but that is all we know from the stats .
The article SUGGESTS that C19 at least contributed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the fact is we can not tell .
C19 may have been present but played no roll in their deaths , or played some role but we so not know to what degree .
Moreover , in the case of someone already dying from cancer , along comes C19 and finishes the poor devil off .
So the government and media are fond of pointing out that C19 killed them because the patient would have lasted longer if it had not been there .
But equally , you could say that the cancer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or pneumonia and so forth ) killed them because without the cancer the C19 virsus , which is not natively fatal , would not have killed them .
So it depends on what spin you are putting on it and what you want to fix in the readers mind as to how you state it .
But the “ positive ” tests are not reliable and we can not be sure that the 34 people who had “ tested positive ” were actually positive !
The problems with the PCR test are now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reiterate here what is by now broadly known and understood .
But to summarise : the PCR test detects often MINUTE traces of remnants of Coronavirus ( a family of viruses of which C19 is just one ) DNA .
It does not detect the presence of an actual virus .
It is notoriously inaccurate , giving a very high rate of false positives .
How high we assume that percentage of false positives is depends on which account we heed but the PM and Foreign Secretary have both admitted the test is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a test is only accurate in 7 out of every hundred done , it is in fact SEVEN TIMES less reliable than tossing a ruddy coin , which one would expect to give an accurate verdict roughly 50 out of every 100 times !
So basically , all we know from the article is that 42 people died ( at a rate of one per week for every 250 hospitals ) over the last EIGHT WEEKS .
And we can not be certain that the C19 virus actually killed any of even that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ does essentially is take some very NON SCARY figures that tell us there IS NOT a dangerous mass-killing epidemic going on , spins them and creates an illusion that purports to show how there IS a scary mass killing epidemic going on .
Then of course you look beyond the article at other stats , such as the overall chance of dying from C19 ( even if you take the misleading figures as true ! )
being about the same as dying from seasonal flu and the amazing coincidence that what are alleged @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to routine colds and flu , it is hard to tell the difference and you start to realise that we are being played on a monstrous scale .
And realise too that on the basis of a bug that allegedly ( but probably doesn ’ t ) kills 3 or 4 people per day across the entire country , whole areas are being shut down , businesses ruined and so on and so forth .
The very kindest thing you can say about a government that acts as if we are in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such thing is that it is very very easily panicked and its judgement is atrocious .
But that is the kindest thing you can say .
The reality is that this government and the media that acts as its propaganda arm is much more evil than that .
• these criminals prosecuted and held to account .
• new laws to place restrictions upon those in government so that this sort of monstrously destructive deception NEVER HAPPENS AGAIN .
• news laws that make the spinning of fake emergencies illegal and punishable by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ similar .
• new laws that make it illegal for any politician or government official to knowingly lie or make false reports to the people The above article is from UK Reloaded

by Kieron McFadden
The following article is from the Independent, which is owned by Russian oligarch Evgeny Lebedev (Tory Party donor), Saudi Sultan Sultan Muhammad Abuljadaye and Justin Byam Shaw chum of the Tory party Chairman .
Coronavirus UK: Further 42 hospital deaths in England as total doubles compared to last week
It provides a fantastic example of how the media play sly mind games that (a) try to scare the crap out of the reader yet (b) rely on the reader not reading the article properly.
As an exercise in coming to an understanding of how this works, compare the scary, misleading headline with the ACTUAL DATA in the article.
Take a look that the article HERE and compare what it actually says with what the headline suggests.
In summary:
The 42 deaths were over a 2 month period. If you don’t read the article carefully you are likely to miss that point. That is roughly EIGHT WEEKS, which means an average of just over 5 deaths per week ACROSS THE UK.
There are about 1250 hospitals in the UK, which means one COVID 19 death for roughly every 260 hospitals!
Put in that missing context, it is not so scary is it? You cannot sell a scare that way. But it gets even more silly.
Then read carefully what the article says about the deaths.
ALL of them were of people between 45 and 100.
If you check the age distribution you will find that the vast majority were over 65.
Only THREE of them had no underlying conditions.
When they say “underlying conditions”, they mean things like cancer, lung disease etc that leave the person vulnerable to COVID and other bugs that are not killers on their own.
But they usually do not take into account other underlying conditions such as drug use, psych meds, severe vitamin D deficiencies, malnutrition, psychological factors and so forth. So even the three that had “no underlying conditions” may actually have had conditions that enabled a natively non-fatal bug to become fatal in PERHAPS one, two or all of those three cases.
8 were recorded as C19 deaths without even being tested. So we cannot be certain how many of these – IF ANY – were actually deaths where C19 was even present.
Of the remainder (31- roughly one death for every 400 UK hospitals) these, we assume, tested positive for COVID19.
But note another trick that throws in confusion and imprecision: the article sometimes refers to “Coronavirus” and sometimes, more specifically to C19. Coronavirus covers a family of viruses of which C19 is just one, So if you say a person tested positive for Coronavirus or died with Coronavirus that does not NECESSARILY mean C19, it could also mean the common cold or other viruses in that family.
It is worth bearing in mind that one thing that has characterised both the government’s and the media’s reporting of this “pandemic” to the people has been the vagueness or imprecision or inherent contradictions of the terms being used or the advice being given. This chaos of information creates confusions and uncertainty, which makes the job of the propagandist intent upon giving events a particular spin, a lot easier.
One could almost voice this as a natural law of propaganda: clarity of communication and meaning is the enemy of effective lying
This means that they tested positive within four weeks of their death. It means that C19 was allegedly present when they died or had recently been present. It does not NECESSARILY mean that C19 killed them, only that it was present.
All those people had underlying conditions. C19 was allegedly present but that is all we know from the stats. The article SUGGESTS that C19 at least contributed to the deaths of those people but the fact is we cannot tell. C19 may have been present but played no roll in their deaths, or played some role but we so not know to what degree.
Moreover, in the case of someone already dying from cancer, along comes C19 and finishes the poor devil off. So the government and media are fond of pointing out that C19 killed them because the patient would have lasted longer if it had not been there.
But equally, you could say that the cancer (or obesity, or asthma, or pneumonia and so forth) killed them because without the cancer the C19 virsus, which is not natively fatal, would not have killed them. So it depends on what spin you are putting on it and what you want to fix in the readers mind as to how you state it.
But the “positive” tests are not reliable and we cannot be sure that the 34 people who had “tested positive” were actually positive!
The problems with the PCR test are now legendary and there is no need to reiterate here what is by now broadly known and understood. But to summarise: the PCR test detects often MINUTE traces of remnants of Coronavirus (a family of viruses of which C19 is just one) DNA. It does not detect the presence of an actual virus. It is notoriously inaccurate, giving a very high rate of false positives. How high we assume that percentage of false positives is depends on which account we heed but the PM and Foreign Secretary have both admitted the test is only about 7% reliable.
If a test is only accurate in 7 out of every hundred done, it is in fact SEVEN TIMES less reliable than tossing a ruddy coin, which one would expect to give an accurate verdict roughly 50 out of every 100 times!
So basically, all we know from the article is that 42 people died (at a rate of one per week for every 250 hospitals) over the last EIGHT WEEKS. And we cannot be certain that the C19 virus actually killed any of even that tiny number!
So what the article does essentially is take some very NON SCARY figures that tell us there IS NOT a dangerous mass-killing epidemic going on, spins them and creates an illusion that purports to show how there IS a scary mass killing epidemic going on.
Then of course you look beyond the article at other stats, such as the overall chance of dying from C19 (even if you take the misleading figures as true!) being about the same as dying from seasonal flu and the amazing coincidence that what are alleged to be its symptoms are so similar to routine colds and flu, it is hard to tell the difference and you start to realise that we are being played on a monstrous scale.
And realise too that on the basis of a bug that allegedly (but probably doesn’t) kills 3 or 4 people per day across the entire country, whole areas are being shut down, businesses ruined and so on and so forth.
The very kindest thing you can say about a government that acts as if we are in the middle of the Black Death or some such thing is that it is very very easily panicked and its judgement is atrocious.
But that is the kindest thing you can say.
The reality is that this government and the media that acts as its propaganda arm is much more evil than that.
Personally, I want
these criminals prosecuted and held to account.
new laws to place restrictions upon those in government so that this sort of monstrously destructive deception NEVER HAPPENS AGAIN.
news laws that make the spinning of fake emergencies illegal and punishable by imprisonment on a charge of treason or similar.
new laws that make it illegal for any politician or government official to knowingly lie or make false reports to the people
ETCETERA …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-10-20--Google ‘whistleblower’ tells Project Veritas that search engine ‘skews’ results in Democrats’ favor

In footage published on Monday , the conservative media watchdog shared around eight minutes of an interview with a man identified as Ritesh Lakhkar , said to be a technical program manager at Google ’ s Cloud service , who accused the company of putting its thumb on the digital scales for the Democrats .
“ The wind is blowing toward Democrats , because GOP equals Trump and Trump equals GOP .
Everybody hates it , even though GOP may have good traits , no one wants to acknowledge them right now , ” Lakhkar said when asked whether Google @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – whose LinkedIn page states he ’ s worked at Google since May 2018 – did not specify exactly how the company gives an edge to certain political viewpoints , he suggested the platform is selling favorable coverage to the highest bidder .
“ It ’ s skewed by the owners or the drivers of the algorithm .
Like , if I say ‘ Hey Google , here ’ s another two billion dollars , feed this data set of whenever Joe Biden is searched , you ’ ll get these results , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Big Tech firms for “ playing god and taking away freedom of speech on both sides.
” Lakhkar complained of a suffocating , overly-political atmosphere at Google , where he said “ your opinion matters more than your work , ” recalling a dramatic response to Donald Trump ’ s 2016 election win at the company .
Several media reports have documented employees ’ appalled reactions to the victory , including internal company footage of a meeting soon after the election , where co-founder Sergey Brin is heard comparing Trump ’ s win @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ When Trump won the first time , people were crying in the corridors of Google .
There were protests , there were marches .
There were like , I guess , group therapy sessions for employees organized by HR , ” he said .
Google , which has yet to respond to Lakhkar ’ s charges , has come under fire previously with allegations of political bias in its search results , with internal documents obtained by Project Veritas last year suggesting the company maintains content “ blacklists ” targeting certain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Google also declined to address the prior claim , but company head Sundar Pichai has insisted the search engine does not favor one viewpoint over another , and that Google ’ s algorithms are “ impossible ” to manipulate .
Just a glitch ?
Google hides conservative & alt-media websites from search results for hours Twitter punished for multiple campaign finance violations with $ 100k fine… after earning almost TWICE as much in process ( TLB ) published this article from RT-USA News with our gratitude for the coverage and availability .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ People Profiting From The Quarantine Are Censoring Criticisms of It Media Giants converge in new era of News Reporting

(RT-USA News)
In footage published on Monday, the conservative media watchdog shared around eight minutes of an interview with a man identified as Ritesh Lakhkar, said to be a technical program manager at Google’s Cloud service, who accused the company of putting its thumb on the digital scales for the Democrats.
“The wind is blowing toward Democrats, because GOP equals Trump and Trump equals GOP. Everybody hates it, even though GOP may have good traits, no one wants to acknowledge them right now,” Lakhkar said when asked whether Google favors either political party.
So the wind is blowing toward Democrats, so let’s skew the results toward Democrats.
BREAKING: @Google Program Manager Confirms Election Interference In Favor of @JoeBiden Google search “skewed by owners and drivers of the algorithm” “Plain and simple trying to play god”#ExposeGoogle pic.twitter.com/swyV1W3ZKt — Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) October 19, 2020
While Lakhar – whose LinkedIn page states he’s worked at Google since May 2018 – did not specify exactly how the company gives an edge to certain political viewpoints, he suggested the platform is selling favorable coverage to the highest bidder.
“It’s skewed by the owners or the drivers of the algorithm. Like, if I say ‘Hey Google, here’s another two billion dollars, feed this data set of whenever Joe Biden is searched, you’ll get these results,’” he went on, blasting Big Tech firms for “playing god and taking away freedom of speech on both sides.”
You’re playing selective god. Like, if it was fraud it doesn’t matter, but for Trump or Melania Trump, it matters… Trump says something, misinformation. You’re going to delete that because it’s illegal under whatever pretext. And if a Democratic leader says that, you’re going to leave it.
Lakhkar complained of a suffocating, overly-political atmosphere at Google, where he said “your opinion matters more than your work,” recalling a dramatic response to Donald Trump’s 2016 election win at the company. Several media reports have documented employees’ appalled reactions to the victory, including internal company footage of a meeting soon after the election, where co-founder Sergey Brin is heard comparing Trump’s win to the rise of fascism in Europe.
“When Trump won the first time, people were crying in the corridors of Google. There were protests, there were marches. There were like, I guess, group therapy sessions for employees organized by HR,” he said.
I guess that’s one of the reasons I feel suffocated [at Google]. Because on one side you have this unprofessional attitude, and on the other side you have this ultra-leftist attitude. Your entire existence is questioned.
Google, which has yet to respond to Lakhkar’s charges, has come under fire previously with allegations of political bias in its search results, with internal documents obtained by Project Veritas last year suggesting the company maintains content “blacklists” targeting certain media outlets, most of them right-of-center. Google also declined to address the prior claim, but company head Sundar Pichai has insisted the search engine does not favor one viewpoint over another, and that Google’s algorithms are “impossible” to manipulate.
_________
Also from RT
*********
(TLB) published this article from RT-USA News with our gratitude for the coverage and availability.
Related from The Liberty Beacon:
••••
••••
Stay tuned…


thelibertybeacon--2020-10-20--Large Sums of Dark $$$ Poured Into Debate Commission Since 2016

Large sums of dark money poured into debate commission since 2016 The Commission on Presidential Debates ( CPD ) is a private and secretive charitable nonprofit ( NFP ) corporation required to serve as nonpartisans .
It does not .
It has monopolized presidential debates since 1988 and was calling out for corruption in the age of Obama .
The goal was to allow the two parties to hammer out the formats of presidential debates .
The commission has listed presidents as honorary co-chairs : Presidents Carter , Bush and Obama , Ford , and Reagan .
Oddly , Presidents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this list on September 10 , 2019 .
Currently , there are more Democrats on the committee .
The Republicans are never Trumpers .
On October 1 , 2019 , they went from two co-chairs to three .
Two are Democrats .
They added a 3rd Co-Chair , Kenneth Wollack , former President of the National Democratic Institute ( NDI ) .
It was allegedly to deal with…don ’ t laugh…wait for it… partisanship .
The PD keeps its donors ’ names , and donor amounts secret and hidden from the public .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Debate Sponsors ” list on its website since , curiously , 2016 .
They had $ 12.3 million poured into this commission since 2016 , and it is ALL ‘ dark money.
’ The donors are hidden from us , but not the members and chairs .
The committee has put three Trump haters up as debate moderators , and the questions are framed to reflect leftist interests .
The last moderator , Kristen Welker , is the worst of the lot .
A New York Post article stated : ‘ Anyone who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she ’ s an activist , not a reporter .
The White House press team views her the same way they would AOC or Pelosi if they walked in the office , ’ a senior White House official told The Post .
All the protections for Joe Biden are in place , even a mute button .
It ’ s only supposed to be used for the first fifteen minutes .
However , you know that Democrat activist turned moderator Kristen Welker will use it at other times to humiliate the President and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ points .
It won ’ t be used on Biden .
The questions are geared for vague , leftist generalizations , and foreign policy was just taken out of the list of topics .
We won ’ t hear about cash on pallets to our enemy , or President Trump ’ s peace in the Middle East plan .
Open borders are also out as a topic .
The commission is interfering in our elections more than any Russian has .
President Trump is again set up for failure this week with a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ list of topics meant to help Joe Biden and hurt President Trump .
The NDI ’ s Board includes Madeleine Albright , former Secretary of State under Bill Clinton , and other Democrats , including Tom Daschle , Donna Brazile , Howard Dean , Robin Carnahan , Mitt Romney , and others .
Co-chair Kenneth Wollack , through his leadership at the NDI , has deep ties to international socialists through the NDI ’ s role as an “ Associated organization ” of Socialist International .
Wollack ’ s goals are to “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ] here in the United States .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

Large sums of dark money poured into debate commission since 2016
By: M. Dowling
The Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) is a private and secretive charitable nonprofit (NFP) corporation required to serve as nonpartisans. It does not.
It has monopolized presidential debates since 1988 and was calling out for corruption in the age of Obama.
The goal was to allow the two parties to hammer out the formats of presidential debates.
The commission has listed presidents as honorary co-chairs: Presidents Carter, Bush and Obama, Ford, and Reagan. Oddly, Presidents Bush and Obama were only added to this list on September 10, 2019.
Currently, there are more Democrats on the committee. The Republicans are never Trumpers. On October 1, 2019, they went from two co-chairs to three. Two are Democrats.
They added a 3rd Co-Chair, Kenneth Wollack, former President of the National Democratic Institute (NDI).
It was allegedly to deal with…don’t laugh…wait for it… partisanship.
TRANSFORMING THE USA
The PD keeps its donors’ names, and donor amounts secret and hidden from the public. It has not updated its “National Debate Sponsors” list on its website since, curiously, 2016.
They had $12.3 million poured into this commission since 2016, and it is ALL ‘dark money.’ The donors are hidden from us, but not the members and chairs.
The committee has put three Trump haters up as debate moderators, and the questions are framed to reflect leftist interests. The last moderator, Kristen Welker, is the worst of the lot.
A New York Post article stated: ‘Anyone who’s ever dealt with Welker knows she’s an activist, not a reporter. The White House press team views her the same way they would AOC or Pelosi if they walked in the office,’ a senior White House official told The Post.
All the protections for Joe Biden are in place, even a mute button. It’s only supposed to be used for the first fifteen minutes. However, you know that Democrat activist turned moderator Kristen Welker will use it at other times to humiliate the President and cut him short as he makes good points. It won’t be used on Biden.
The questions are geared for vague, leftist generalizations, and foreign policy was just taken out of the list of topics.
We won’t hear about cash on pallets to our enemy, or President Trump’s peace in the Middle East plan. Open borders are also out as a topic.
The commission is interfering in our elections more than any Russian has.
Stacked Deck
President Trump is again set up for failure this week with a Trump-hating Democrat activist as moderator and a list of topics meant to help Joe Biden and hurt President Trump.
The NDI’s Board includes Madeleine Albright, former Secretary of State under Bill Clinton, and other Democrats, including Tom Daschle, Donna Brazile, Howard Dean, Robin Carnahan, Mitt Romney, and others.
Co-chair Kenneth Wollack, through his leadership at the NDI, has deep ties to international socialists through the NDI’s role as an “Associated organization” of Socialist International.
Wollack’s goals are to “create democracy” [buzzword for socialism] here in the United States.
••••
••••
More great articles by M. Dowling
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-10-20--Rapper 50 Cent Melts Down Over Biden-Harris Tax Plan, Endorses Trump [Video]

“ WHAT THE F*CK !
IM OUT ” : Rapper 50 Cent Melts Down Over Biden-Harris Tax Plan , Endorses Trump Rapper 50 Cent has taken to Twitter to endorse President Trump after losing his mind over the Biden-Harris tax plan , which would result in a top tax rate of in New York City .
“ WHAT THE F*CK !
( VOTE ForTRUMP ) IM OUT , ” tweeted the rapper , whose real name is Curtis James Jackson III .
“ F*CK NEW YORK The KNICKS never win anyway , ” he added .
“ I don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ black people 62 % are you out of ya f**king mind.
” The New York-based rapper may want to reconsider his opinion of Trump , however – as the president received the NAACP ’ s Ellis Island Medal of Honor , while then-Senator Joe Biden worried in 1977 about his children growing up in a ‘ racial jungle ’ if schools were desegregated , before going on to write the 1994 crime bill which would incarcerate record numbers of blacks for petty crimes .
If Biden wins , 50 might want to buy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cash .
( TLB ) published this article from ZeroHedge as put together by Tyler Durden and Crew .
Black Pastor : Trump is the Most Pro-Black President in History Diamond and Silk suggest left will do anything to destroy Trump The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew @ @ @ @ @ @ @ growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .
Disclaimer : The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including , but not limited to , text , graphics , images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction .
Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice , diagnosis @ @ @

“WHAT THE F*CK! IM OUT”: Rapper 50 Cent Melts Down Over Biden-Harris Tax Plan, Endorses Trump
ZH
Rapper 50 Cent has taken to Twitter to endorse President Trump after losing his mind over the Biden-Harris tax plan, which would result in a top tax rate of 62% in New York City.
“WHAT THE F*CK! (VOTE ForTRUMP) IM OUT,” tweeted the rapper, whose real name is Curtis James Jackson III. “F*CK NEW YORK The KNICKS never win anyway,” he added.
“I don’t care Trump doesn’t like black people 62% are you out of ya f**king mind.”
👀WHAT THE F*CK! (VOTE ForTRUMP) IM OUT, 🏃♂💨F*CK NEW YORK The KNICKS never win anyway. 🤷🏽♂I don’t care Trump doesn’t like black people 62% are you out of ya fucking mind. 😤 pic.twitter.com/uZu02k2Dlz — 50cent (@50cent) October 19, 2020
…After a long discussion of who we were going to be voting for in the election, 50 Cent and myself came to the same conclusion. pic.twitter.com/H2NP7uoEGo — Brian Dawe (@DJBrianDawe) October 20, 2020
The New York-based rapper may want to reconsider his opinion of Trump, however – as the president received the NAACP’s Ellis Island Medal of Honor, while then-Senator Joe Biden worried in 1977 about his children growing up in a ‘racial jungle’ if schools were desegregated, before going on to write the 1994 crime bill which would incarcerate record numbers of blacks for petty crimes.
If Biden wins, 50 might want to buy a few more Lamborghinis to stow his cash.
*********
(TLB) published this article from ZeroHedge as put together by Tyler Durden and Crew.
Related articles from The Liberty Beacon:
••••
••••
Stay tuned…
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.