thelibertybeacon--2020-08-17--The Bizarre Non-Reaction of the Left to Lockdown

We give more credit to Off-Guardian than Allen does , who seems to be a bit afraid of ‘ conspiracy theorists ’ : they have done stellar work on the nitty-gritty of some of the dirtiest aspects of the virus scare , taking the treatment of the elderly in care homes as a case in point .
Recognized by Allen , we also recommend RT ( UK ) journalist Neil Clark ( Twitter ) for his excellent pieces and tweets on the liberty-destroying aspects of what we ’ re experiencing .
Kudos , Neil !
Not mentioned are excellent analysts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have called out the plandemic and the globalists behind it in the clearest possible terms : Professor Michel Chossudovsky and Peter Koenig .
To this list we also add competent independent historian Eric Zuesse , who obsesses on the fact that ‘ Covid-19 ’ can produce some terrible symptoms in a relatively small number of people that are so afflicted , and that lockdown is somehow a kind , caring policy , but seems to actively avoid other critical aspects of this cruel virus farce .
But no .
They have no interest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of poor and working class realities , or they have a visceral fear of disorder , impurity and death which motivates their stunning insensitivity to such matters , or they are cynical opportunists ever-ready to leap on a moral-panic bandwagon , or they are members of the professional class worshipping at the altar of management ( which you are now a murderer if you disobey ) , or they are more interested in identity politics and Eckhart Tolle , or they are too proud to admit they were wrong , or they are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be 100 per cent certain , but even if there ’ s a tiny chance that C-19 is no worse than seasonal flu and that lock down will result in oceans of avoidable misery , it ’ s the radical left that should be spearheading the criticism .
Media Lens , George Galloway , Jonathan Cook ( pictured below ) , Glenn Greenwald , Afshin Rattansi , The Canary , Moon of Alabama , Aaron Bastani , Ran Prieur , Noam Chomsky and many , many others — even John Pilger and John @ @ @ @ @ @ @ d have guessed to fold [ 8 ] — just let the lockdown happen , cheered for it , pushed for stricter controls .
Jonathan Cook peeped his head about the parapet for a split-second , spiritual astronaut Caitlin Johnstone ( pictured ) asked one or two questions on peripheral matters before concluding that she finds ‘ the whole thing ultimately irrelevant and boring ’ , XR started rubbing their hands , Afshin Rattansi vaguely gestured towards a few sceptical RT pieces and Paul Kingsnorth sat in a barley field and stared majestically @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pretty much it .
We ’ re not ‘ asking for a friend ’ but asking as former lefties ourselves – the Old Left ( entirely moderate ) that actually cared about the needs and wishes of the overwhelming majority of people , that took the trouble – crucially – to identify with the traditional working classes , who comprise the majority of our populations .
People who desperately need their jobs and livelihoods , as well as their rights to essential liberties .
In April I wrote a postscript to my critique @ @ @ @ @ @ @ David Graeber , Noam Chomsky , Media Lens , etc . )
criticising their non-response to the already highly suspicious coronavirus narrative .
Things have moved on — now into the past tense — so here is the same summary , now updated and revised .
A deadly pandemic , we are told , swept across the planet , forcing governments to massively enhance state and police power , lock everyone up in their homes and bork the economy .
National governments , transnational institutions and all media outlets were of one voice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ put millions and millions of people out of work then shut them up in a heavily policed panic room .
Anyone unable to perceive the foundations of the unofficial left might imagine that they would have interrogated this extraordinary situation , that they would have critically appraised official accounts of the severity of the ‘ pandemic ’ , that they would have asked themselves what the likely effects might be of putting so many people out of work ; or that it would have been the perfect time for ‘ radicals ’ to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , to explore wider questions about its stability and to critically investigate vested interests ; perhaps also take a look at the universal denial of death and how easily people can be manipulated by playing on their fears , or even explore the possibilities for genuine revolt as the economy contracted .
They would have been disappointed .
What was the response of the unofficial socialists mentioned in the original article ?
• Did they criticise the official story ?
• Did they ask if anything else might have been motivating their leaders @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Did they question the extraordinarily repressive measures governments have taken to contain the problem ?
• Did they question official figures ( or even looked at them — many were surprisingly frank ) ?
• Did they take a second look at other epidemics and pandemics ( such as the flu pandemics of 57 and 68 : each of which were twice as deadly as C-19 ) , or at deaths from influenza under normal conditions ( around half a million a year — about the same as C-19 ) , or at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pneumonia ?
• Did they sound any alarm bells about rather suspicious proposed solutions such as an express vaccine , contact-tracing and so forth ?
• Did any of these people ask any seriously critical , or even very interesting , questions ?
The answer to all of these questions was an almost entirely predictable no .
Every man jack of them fell straight into line .
Jonathan Cook peeped his head about the parapet for a split-second , spiritual astronaut Caitlin Johnstone asked one or two questions on peripheral matters before concluding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ultimately irrelevant and boring ’ , XR started rubbing their hands , Afshin Rattansi vaguely gestured towards a few sceptical RT pieces and Paul Kingsnorth sat in a barley field and stared majestically into the sunset .
But that was pretty much it .
I say ‘ almost ’ predictable because even I was surprised at how uniformly subservient all these people turned out to be .
That , with a handful of noble exceptions — OffGuardian , Neil Clark , Piers Robinson and Tim Hayward — the entire left-wing , official and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unquestioningly behind the crime of the century was , I admit , something of a surprise .
So total and unanimous was it that — and I ’ m probably not alone here — I ’ ve more than once had to look at the entire matter again from the start to check , ‘ yes Darren , you ’ re not mad .
It really has happened this way.
’ It is now clear — and was evident in April — that the coronavirus wasn ’ t anything like as bad as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ downgraded by the British government long ago from the most serious category of illness ) .
That survival rates were around 99.99 % , that the vast majority of deaths were the very old ( over sixty five ) and infirm ( at least with pre-existing conditions ) .
That it was and is almost completely harmless to people under 50 ( it ’ s effectively impossible for a child to get it ) , that it didn ’ t have an unprecedented super tragic impact on ICUs around the world ( Spanish @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) .
That masks don ’ t appear to be particularly effective [ 1 ] and neither does the two-meter rule ( essentially made up ) , that official figures — particularly in those countries most desirous of becoming entirely autocratic — were inflated by including people dying with the virus rather than merely dying of it ( along with , it seems likely , other statistical shenanigans [ 2 ] ) .
That those countries which didn ’ t lockdown — such as Sweden and Japan — did absolutely fine ( while @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on earth you can not find — would have done fine , but chose instead to push 70,000 children into poverty ) .
That the wealthiest people in the world become much , much richer , that we ’ ve taken a massive lurch towards a techno-dystopian world controlled by an ever shrinking cartel of IT companies and that lockdown has destroyed and will continue to destroy the lives of millions upon millions of poor people ( the UN predicts a ‘ biblical famine , ’ possibly as many as 300,000 deaths a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reason .
Not that I care about ‘ the economy ’ , nor about some of the wonderful freedoms that have been lost ( oh gosh , no football , no theatre [ 3 ] , no pubs [ 4 ] , no protests* , woe ) , nor do I think the world has , as so many are now lamenting , ‘ become ’ dystopian — it has actually just , as I have already predicted , ditched a Huxleyan dystopia for an Orwellian one .
( *ER : The right @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has been usefully curtailed by the Establishment just at the time when it is most needed .
France ’ s Yellow Vests can tell us that . )
The point is ‘ the wrecked economy ’ refers to the bottom 80 % of economic activity — and if that is obliterated , what is going to take its place ?
Will the system just let everyone see to their own well-being , handing out no-strings-attached UBI to do so ?
Unlikely .
It ’ s the same with losing our freedom to assemble @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will we have instead ?
Greater freedom ?
Really ?
In fact , it ’ s the same with the other big issue of the day , defunding the police — great , but do you think that the system will just let anything go ?
Or will it replace the police with private security forces , automatic surveillance and punishment and state-approved ‘ community policing ‘ ( i.e .
woke militia ) ?
Lockdown enthusiasts and supporters , implicit or otherwise , of the coronavirus story are keen to dismiss scepticism as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ citing as evidence the beliefs of those most vehemently anti-mask , anti-lockdown and anti-forced-vaccine , which range from reasonable doubts about the motives of Bill Gates , the WHO , the WEF and so on to climate-change denial ( ER : a rational , defensible viewpoint ) , flat-earth theories and the cosmic dance of David Icke ’ s lizard-people .
This is of course one of the oldest tricks in the book : dismiss an idea by citing the unrelated attitudes and actions of its most extreme adherents .
‘ Look @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is an example of one of them saying something completely crazy/evil/stupid !
’ ( Lockdown sceptics do the same thing ; ‘ Look how mad they are ; they want us to have sex through glory holes !
’ ) Speaking for myself I don ’ t have much interest in theorising about , for example , this document , ( ER : the Rockefeller Foundation document containing the Lockstep policy ) currently doing the rounds , which is said to be a ‘ blueprint ’ for the new world order we are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ almost entirely online , under constant bio-surveillance ; an updated version of China ’ s horrifying social credit system , in which discipline and punishment are practically automatic .
The reason being that such medial agents of social change are a ) debatable and b ) secondary .
( ER : We don ’ t believe the Rockefeller Foundation should be so quickly dismissed , since its Lockstep scenario planning has anticipated much of what we ’ re experiencing in a number of areas .
See this by Peter Koenig , The Global @ @ @ @ @ @ @ State ” ) It is the distal process that we are embedded in , the entire context , the entire system ( see my account , here ) and the proximal ego which created and maintains it which much be understood and dismantled , not this or that cartel or cabal , secret or otherwise .
It is the system as a whole which results in the new world order .
That those the system rewards , promotes , places and keeps in power are halfmen hell-bent on turning reality into an earth-munching @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our ills , but a consequence .
What ’ s more , speculation about such details actually only ends up serving power , which is why power has always sought to incite such debate and limit access to deeper and more distant comprehension .
I ’ m not dismissing enquiry into the functioning of international elite planning , which interests me as much as it should anyone else , but the point is that the final and most appalling stages of the dystopian nightmare we ’ ve been living for millennia is no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Betelgeusian Reptoid than depression is the result of the boss , or impotence is the result of the wife , or boredom is the result of having nothing to do .
Focusing on the boss , the wife or the broken playstation is to enter a debate which is as futile and pointless as ‘ do masks work ?
’ For further information , here is my account at the time , here is a good overview by Dmitri Orlov , here is another good account and here another , here are OffGuardian @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thorough up to date summary by the ‘ SPR ’ ( whoever they are ) , here and here are some decent assessments of mask-wearing , here is Charles Eisenstein ’ s typically fair ( and typically sugary ) assessment , here is a good assessment from back in March of what lockdown would lead to and here is an excellent and very thorough ( socialist !
[ 5 ] ) critique of the left ’ s response to the coronavirus .
OffGuardian and the SPR seem to make a few unproven claims @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they do somewhat tend towards the conspiracy-theory end of the speculative spectrum ; but so what ?
The same criticism can be made of many critical voices .
I ’ m always interested to hear about errors in such accounts , but what matters is what they are saying as a whole .
Most of the figures they quote are official statistics ; in many cases the facts are now in plain view .
According to the NHS and ONS in the UK , for example , a tiny number have died in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vast majority of which were over 65 .
Facts about Sweden [ 6 ] and Japan are equally transparent , as are facts about how many people usually die of flu , which has been suspiciously quiet this year , or of similar diseases , such as TB , which nobody in power has ever given a toss about , certainly not now that an increase in TB deaths is due to lockdown .
But this is actually besides the point here .
Even if it turns out that c-19 is uniquely dangerous @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people than any other flu since the second world war , that it really did require a world-wide poor-destroying lockdown , that a dangerous vaccine really is necessary , as is more invasive state-corporate surveillance and face-masks and all the rest of it , or that , most fancifully of all , that all the governments of the world really do suddenly care about our health .
Even if all this and more turns out to be true — and there is a faaaaar-distant chance that it might [ 7 ] — that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the official narrative by those people who are supposed to question it .
Imagine if the government said ‘ Quick !
The Russians are attacking !
’ The job of radicals , outsiders and so on is to investigate that claim , to check whether it is true , to doubt — even if the Russians actually are coming !
Media Lens , George Galloway , Jonathan Cook , Glenn Greenwald , Afshin Rattansi , The Canary , Moon of Alabama , Aaron Bastani , Ran Prieur , Noam Chomsky and many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and John Zerzan , neither of whom I ’ d have guessed to fold [ 8 ] — just let the lockdown happen , cheered for it , pushed for stricter controls .
The question I asked about Media Lens here — what were they prepared to allow in order to feel safe — certainly found an answer .
No ‘ hang-on a moment ’ , no ‘ do we really need the state and the police and the tech companies of the world to be immensely more powerful , no ‘ but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ no ‘ buts ’ at all !
They all entirely accepted the situation as it was officially presented and ignored all counter-evidence .
It ’ s hard to avoid the conclusion that they are all quite happy for us all to live in a far more authoritarian state to deal with a virus that may well have killed a microscopic percentage of the world ’ s population but will very likely kill millions of people as a result .
Again , hard to be 100 per cent certain , but even if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ C-19 is no worse than seasonal flu and that lock down will result in oceans of avoidable misery , it ’ s the radical left that should be spearheading the criticism .
But no .
They have no interest in or any kind of lived experience of poor and working class realities , or they have a visceral fear of disorder , impurity and death which motivates their stunning insensitivity to such matters , or they are cynical opportunists ever-ready to leap on a moral-panic bandwagon , or they are members of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ management ( which you are now a murderer if you disobey ) , or they are more interested in identity politics and Eckhart Tolle , or they are too proud to admit they were wrong , or they are straight cowards .
A blend of all of them I think , but whatever the reason , they support the civilised system at the most fundamental level .
As William Morris observed , although the middle-class is comprised of lovely , lovely individuals , it is from left to right , ‘ a most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was asked on Twitter what should be done with the left .
Surely they just need to be safely shown the facts of the situation and be gently led round to seeing things as they are , or at least to question how things appear to be , try to persuade them they ’ re wrong .
I don ’ t agree .
Argument isn ’ t ever totally useless , for reasons I ’ ve explained elsewhere , but debate hasn ’ t worked because it can ’ t work .
As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this goes much deeper than the facts — which is why they ’ re all of one voice .
The only appropriate response to the socialist left is the same as that to the capitalist right : ignore them , expose them and resist them .
As time goes on , this will become clearer and clearer .
Read the original article — an anarchist critique of ‘ unofficial socialists ’ ( such as Noam Chomsky , David Graeber and Mark Fisher ) here .
See also the latter chapters of my free @ @ @ @ @ @ @ OF THE SYSTEM for more critique of the reformist left and its systemic priorities .

We give more credit to Off-Guardian than Allen does, who seems to be a bit afraid of ‘conspiracy theorists’: they have done stellar work on the nitty-gritty of some of the dirtiest aspects of the virus scare , taking the treatment of the elderly in care homes as a case in point. Recognized by Allen, we also recommend RT (UK) journalist Neil Clark ( Twitter ) for his excellent pieces and tweets on the liberty-destroying aspects of what we’re experiencing. Kudos, Neil! Not mentioned are excellent analysts, with expert economic knowledge, who have called out the plandemic and the globalists behind it in the clearest possible terms: Professor Michel Chossudovsky and Peter Koenig .
To this list we also add competent independent historian Eric Zuesse , who obsesses on the fact that ‘Covid-19’ can produce some terrible symptoms in a relatively small number of people that are so afflicted, and that lockdown is somehow a kind, caring policy, but seems to actively avoid other critical aspects of this cruel virus farce.
But no. They have no interest in or any kind of lived experience of poor and working class realities , or they have a visceral fear of disorder, impurity and death which motivates their stunning insensitivity to such matters, or they are cynical opportunists ever-ready to leap on a moral-panic bandwagon, or they are members of the professional class worshipping at the altar of management (which you are now a murderer if you disobey), or they are more interested in identity politics and Eckhart Tolle , or they are too proud to admit they were wrong, or they are straight cowards.
Again, hard to be 100 per cent certain, but even if there’s a tiny chance that C-19 is no worse than seasonal flu and that lock down will result in oceans of avoidable misery, it’s the radical left that should be spearheading the criticism.
Media Lens , George Galloway , Jonathan Cook (pictured below), Glenn Greenwald , Afshin Rattansi, The Canary , Moon of Alabama , Aaron Bastani , Ran Prieur , Noam Chomsky and many, many others — even John Pilger and John Zerzan , neither of whom I’d have guessed to fold[ 8 ] — just let the lockdown happen, cheered for it, pushed for stricter controls.
Jonathan Cook peeped his head about the parapet for a split-second, spiritual astronaut Caitlin Johnstone (pictured) asked one or two questions on peripheral matters before concluding that she finds ‘the whole thing ultimately irrelevant and boring’, XR started rubbing their hands, Afshin Rattansi vaguely gestured towards a few sceptical RT pieces and Paul Kingsnorth sat in a barley field and stared majestically into the sunset. But that was pretty much it.
We’re not ‘asking for a friend’ but asking as former lefties ourselves – the Old Left (entirely moderate) that actually cared about the needs and wishes of the overwhelming majority of people, that took the trouble – crucially – to identify with the traditional working classes, who comprise the majority of our populations. People who desperately need their jobs and livelihoods, as well as their rights to essential liberties.
DARREN ALLEN
In April I wrote a postscript to my critique of the ‘unofficial left’ (David Graeber, Noam Chomsky, Media Lens, etc.) criticising their non-response to the already highly suspicious coronavirus narrative. Things have moved on — now into the past tense — so here is the same summary, now updated and revised.
****
A deadly pandemic, we are told, swept across the planet, forcing governments to massively enhance state and police power, lock everyone up in their homes and bork the economy. National governments, transnational institutions and all media outlets were of one voice. Panic.
We just had to put millions and millions of people out of work then shut them up in a heavily policed panic room.
Anyone unable to perceive the foundations of the unofficial left might imagine that they would have interrogated this extraordinary situation, that they would have critically appraised official accounts of the severity of the ‘pandemic’, that they would have asked themselves what the likely effects might be of putting so many people out of work; or that it would have been the perfect time for ‘radicals’ to seriously question the functioning of the system, to explore wider questions about its stability and to critically investigate vested interests; perhaps also take a look at the universal denial of death and how easily people can be manipulated by playing on their fears, or even explore the possibilities for genuine revolt as the economy contracted. They would have been disappointed.
What was the response of the unofficial socialists mentioned in the original article?
Did they criticise the official story ?
? Did they ask if anything else might have been motivating their leaders than altruistic concern for human life? Did they question the extraordinarily repressive measures governments have taken to contain the problem?
to contain the problem? Did they question official figures (or even looked at them — many were surprisingly frank)?
(or even looked at them — many were surprisingly frank)? Did they take a second look at other epidemics and pandemics (such as the flu pandemics of 57 and 68: each of which were twice as deadly as C-19), or at deaths from influenza under normal conditions (around half a million a year — about the same as C-19), or at deaths from other similar illnesses, like pneumonia?
(such as the flu pandemics of 57 and 68: each of which were twice as deadly as C-19), or at deaths from influenza under normal conditions (around half a million a year — about the same as C-19), or at deaths from other similar illnesses, like pneumonia? Did they sound any alarm bells about rather suspicious proposed solutions such as an express vaccine, contact-tracing and so forth?
and so forth? Did any of these people ask any seriously critical, or even very interesting, questions?
The answer to all of these questions was an almost entirely predictable no. Every man jack of them fell straight into line.
Jonathan Cook peeped his head about the parapet for a split-second, spiritual astronaut Caitlin Johnstone asked one or two questions on peripheral matters before concluding that she finds ‘the whole thing ultimately irrelevant and boring’, XR started rubbing their hands, Afshin Rattansi vaguely gestured towards a few sceptical RT pieces and Paul Kingsnorth sat in a barley field and stared majestically into the sunset. But that was pretty much it.
I say ‘almost’ predictable because even I was surprised at how uniformly subservient all these people turned out to be. That, with a handful of noble exceptions — OffGuardian, Neil Clark, Piers Robinson and Tim Hayward — the entire left-wing, official and unofficial, were instantly, totally, unquestioningly behind the crime of the century was, I admit, something of a surprise.
So total and unanimous was it that — and I’m probably not alone here — I’ve more than once had to look at the entire matter again from the start to check, ‘yes Darren, you’re not mad. It really has happened this way.’
It is now clear — and was evident in April — that the coronavirus wasn’t anything like as bad as it has been presented (it was downgraded by the British government long ago from the most serious category of illness). That survival rates were around 99.99%, that the vast majority of deaths were the very old (over sixty five) and infirm (at least with pre-existing conditions). That it was and is almost completely harmless to people under 50 (it’s effectively impossible for a child to get it), that it didn’t have an unprecedented super tragic impact on ICUs around the world (Spanish hospitals are regularly overburdened in flu season). That masks don’t appear to be particularly effective[1] and neither does the two-meter rule (essentially made up), that official figures — particularly in those countries most desirous of becoming entirely autocratic — were inflated by including people dying with the virus rather than merely dying of it (along with, it seems likely, other statistical shenanigans[2] ).
That those countries which didn’t lockdown — such as Sweden and Japan — did absolutely fine (while New Zealand — a more isolated country on earth you cannot find — would have done fine, but chose instead to push 70,000 children into poverty). That the wealthiest people in the world become much, much richer, that we’ve taken a massive lurch towards a techno-dystopian world controlled by an ever shrinking cartel of IT companies and that lockdown has destroyed and will continue to destroy the lives of millions upon millions of poor people (the UN predicts a ‘biblical famine,’ possibly as many as 300,000 deaths a day), all for no good reason.
Not that I care about ‘the economy’, nor about some of the wonderful freedoms that have been lost (oh gosh, no football, no theatre[3] , no pubs[4], no protests*, woe), nor do I think the world has, as so many are now lamenting, ‘become’ dystopian — it has actually just, as I have already predicted, ditched a Huxleyan dystopia for an Orwellian one. (*ER: The right to protest, a fundamental freedom, has been usefully curtailed by the Establishment just at the time when it is most needed. France’s Yellow Vests can tell us that.)
The point is ‘the wrecked economy’ refers to the bottom 80% of economic activity — and if that is obliterated, what is going to take its place? Will the system just let everyone see to their own well-being, handing out no-strings-attached UBI to do so? Unlikely.
It’s the same with losing our freedom to assemble — if that is lost, what will we have instead? Greater freedom? Really? In fact, it’s the same with the other big issue of the day, defunding the police — great, but do you think that the system will just let anything go? Or will it replace the police with private security forces, automatic surveillance and punishment and state-approved ‘community policing‘ (i.e. woke militia)?
Lockdown enthusiasts and supporters, implicit or otherwise, of the coronavirus story are keen to dismiss scepticism as a form of ‘conspiracy theory,’ citing as evidence the beliefs of those most vehemently anti-mask, anti-lockdown and anti-forced-vaccine, which range from reasonable doubts about the motives of Bill Gates, the WHO, the WEF and so on to climate-change denial (ER: a rational, defensible viewpoint), flat-earth theories and the cosmic dance of David Icke’s lizard-people.
This is of course one of the oldest tricks in the book: dismiss an idea by citing the unrelated attitudes and actions of its most extreme adherents.
‘Look how crazy/evil/stupid these people are — here is an example of one of them saying something completely crazy/evil/stupid!’ (Lockdown sceptics do the same thing; ‘Look how mad they are; they want us to have sex through glory holes!’)
Speaking for myself I don’t have much interest in theorising about, for example, this document, (ER: the Rockefeller Foundation document containing the Lockstep policy) currently doing the rounds, which is said to be a ‘blueprint’ for the new world order we are entering; a cashless society, lived almost entirely online, under constant bio-surveillance; an updated version of China’s horrifying social credit system, in which discipline and punishment are practically automatic. The reason being that such medial agents of social change are a) debatable and b) secondary. (ER: We don’t believe the Rockefeller Foundation should be so quickly dismissed, since its Lockstep scenario planning has anticipated much of what we’re experiencing in a number of areas. See this by Peter Koenig, The Global Reset, Unplugged – “The Deep State”)
It is the distal process that we are embedded in, the entire context, the entire system (see my account, here) and the proximal ego which created and maintains it which much be understood and dismantled, not this or that cartel or cabal, secret or otherwise.
It is the system as a whole which results in the new world order.
That those the system rewards, promotes, places and keeps in power are halfmen hell-bent on turning reality into an earth-munching pleasure machine is not a cause of our ills, but a consequence. What’s more, speculation about such details actually only ends up serving power, which is why power has always sought to incite such debate and limit access to deeper and more distant comprehension.
I’m not dismissing enquiry into the functioning of international elite planning, which interests me as much as it should anyone else, but the point is that the final and most appalling stages of the dystopian nightmare we’ve been living for millennia is no more the result of this or that Betelgeusian Reptoid than depression is the result of the boss, or impotence is the result of the wife, or boredom is the result of having nothing to do. Focusing on the boss, the wife or the broken playstation is to enter a debate which is as futile and pointless as ‘do masks work?’
For further information, here is my account at the time, here is a good overview by Dmitri Orlov, here is another good account and here another, here are OffGuardian’s resources, here is a thorough up to date summary by the ‘SPR’ (whoever they are), here and here are some decent assessments of mask-wearing, here is Charles Eisenstein’s typically fair (and typically sugary) assessment, here is a good assessment from back in March of what lockdown would lead to and here is an excellent and very thorough (socialist![5] ) critique of the left’s response to the coronavirus.
OffGuardian and the SPR seem to make a few unproven claims and cite some questionable sources, and they do somewhat tend towards the conspiracy-theory end of the speculative spectrum; but so what? The same criticism can be made of many critical voices. I’m always interested to hear about errors in such accounts, but what matters is what they are saying as a whole. Most of the figures they quote are official statistics; in many cases the facts are now in plain view.
According to the NHS and ONS in the UK, for example, a tiny number have died in the UK of the coronavirus, the vast majority of which were over 65.
Facts about Sweden[6] and Japan are equally transparent, as are facts about how many people usually die of flu, which has been suspiciously quiet this year, or of similar diseases, such as TB, which nobody in power has ever given a toss about, certainly not now that an increase in TB deaths is due to lockdown.
But this is actually besides the point here. Even if it turns out that c-19 is uniquely dangerous, that it really has killed more people than any other flu since the second world war, that it really did require a world-wide poor-destroying lockdown, that a dangerous vaccine really is necessary, as is more invasive state-corporate surveillance and face-masks and all the rest of it, or that, most fancifully of all, that all the governments of the world really do suddenly care about our health.
Even if all this and more turns out to be true — and there is a faaaaar-distant chance that it might[7] — that still doesn’t excuse complete acceptance of the official narrative by those people who are supposed to question it. Imagine if the government said ‘Quick! The Russians are attacking!’ The job of radicals, outsiders and so on is to investigate that claim, to check whether it is true, to doubt — even if the Russians actually are coming!
Media Lens, George Galloway, Jonathan Cook, Glenn Greenwald, Afshin Rattansi, The Canary, Moon of Alabama, Aaron Bastani, Ran Prieur, Noam Chomsky and many, many others — even John Pilger and John Zerzan, neither of whom I’d have guessed to fold[8] — just let the lockdown happen, cheered for it, pushed for stricter controls.
The question I asked about Media Lens here — what were they prepared to allow in order to feel safe — certainly found an answer. No ‘hang-on a moment’, no ‘do we really need the state and the police and the tech companies of the world to be immensely more powerful, no ‘but what might all this lead to?’ no ‘buts’ at all!
They all entirely accepted the situation as it was officially presented and ignored all counter-evidence. It’s hard to avoid the conclusion that they are all quite happy for us all to live in a far more authoritarian state to deal with a virus that may well have killed a microscopic percentage of the world’s population but will very likely kill millions of people as a result.
Again, hard to be 100 per cent certain, but even if there’s a tiny chance that C-19 is no worse than seasonal flu and that lock down will result in oceans of avoidable misery, it’s the radical left that should be spearheading the criticism.
But no. They have no interest in or any kind of lived experience of poor and working class realities, or they have a visceral fear of disorder, impurity and death which motivates their stunning insensitivity to such matters, or they are cynical opportunists ever-ready to leap on a moral-panic bandwagon, or they are members of the professional class worshipping at the altar of management (which you are now a murderer if you disobey), or they are more interested in identity politics and Eckhart Tolle, or they are too proud to admit they were wrong, or they are straight cowards.
A blend of all of them I think, but whatever the reason, they support the civilised system at the most fundamental level. As William Morris observed, although the middle-class is comprised of lovely, lovely individuals, it is from left to right, ‘a most terrible and implacable force’.
I was asked on Twitter what should be done with the left. Surely they just need to be safely shown the facts of the situation and be gently led round to seeing things as they are, or at least to question how things appear to be, try to persuade them they’re wrong. I don’t agree. Argument isn’t ever totally useless, for reasons I’ve explained elsewhere, but debate hasn’t worked because it can’t work.
As with all matters of real importance, this goes much deeper than the facts — which is why they’re all of one voice.
The only appropriate response to the socialist left is the same as that to the capitalist right: ignore them, expose them and resist them.
As time goes on, this will become clearer and clearer.
********
Read the original article — an anarchist critique of ‘unofficial socialists’ (such as Noam Chomsky, David Graeber and Mark Fisher) here.
See also the latter chapters of my free guide to the unworld, 33 MYTHS OF THE SYSTEM for more critique of the reformist left and its systemic priorities.


thelibertybeacon--2020-08-17--Italy’s Covid Management, Legal Charges Against PM Conte and Six Ministers

The first article is dated August 13 , 2020 from MSM site , La Repubblica .
The second is an piece by Nicola Bizzi of the site Database Italia , the date of which is unclear but it had to be written between July 23 and July 31 according to its contents .
Both articles were run through an automatic translator .
So , Italy ’ s senior government ministers are having lawsuits brought against them on various charges , according to the first piece , for their handling of the public health crisis .
Chigi Palace is the residence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ globalist technocrat Giuseppe Conte ( pictured ) .
The second piece , far more interesting , gives a behind-the-scenes perspective , and mentions Belarusian President Aleksandr Lukashenko ‘ s revelations of the IMF doling out its largesse on condition of locking down a nation ’ s citizens , with the WHO and IMF working in tandem on this .
Primarily , it reveals how the recommendations of Italy ’ s Technical Scientific Committee , advising the government over the handling of the virus , were never made public , not even to members @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appears , up to the time of publication , that Italy has been under a medical state of emergency since January .
July 31st , according to the writer , should have been the end date .
Is Italy still under this emergency state ?
Bizzi mentions ‘ Civil Protection ’ and ‘ Civil Defence ’ several times .
The Civil Protection Department is an agency within the Italian government , under the PM ’ s control , which ‘ deals with the prediction , prevention and management of emergency events ’ : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many scandals below , calling it ultimately a trojan horse for the New World Order .
We wish the Italian plaintiffs in their cases all the best and hope such efforts bear fruit in other countries , too .
A shout-out to architect Robin Monotti Graziadei , whose Twitter account brought these articles to our attention : Covid , notices of guarantee to Count and six ministers .
The pm : to be filed .
The PM : “ I take political responsibility ” Chigi Palace : “ Act due .
Ready to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Public Prosecutor ’ s Office of Rome : “ Unsubstantiated complaints.
” Warranty notice [ sic ] from the pm [ sic ] of Rome against the Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte and Ministers Alfonso Bonafede , Luigi Di Maio , Roberto Gualtieri , Lorenzo Guerini , Luciana Lamorgese and Roberto Speranza .
According to what is read in a note of the Council Presidency , this notice communicates the transmission to the Court of Ministers of the acts of a ( legal ) process born from various complaints from subjects in various parts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , manslaughter against health , manslaughter , abuse of office , attack against the Constitution , attack against the political rights of the citizen ( Articles 110 , 438 , 452 and 589 , 323 , 283 , 294 of the Penal Code ) .
The note from Palazzo Chigi ( Chigi Palace ) also adds that the Rome Public Prosecutor ’ s Office will ask for the case to be dismissed : “ The transmission by the Public Prosecutor ’ s Office to the College according to the provisions of the law @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the specific case this transmission was accompanied by a report in which the Public Prosecutor ’ s Office ‘ considers the news of the text unfounded and therefore to be archived ' ” .
Coronavirus , Salvini : “ Warranty notice to the government ?
He has the dead on his conscience ” Furthermore , PM Conte and the ministers “ declare themselves willing to provide the magistrates with all the elements necessary to complete the procedure , in a spirit of maximum cooperation ” .
Subsequently , the Prime Minister writes on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more than two hundred complaints and complaints from citizens about the actions of the government during the lockdown and the Coronavirus emergency .
The complaints , passed to the pm Eugenio Albamonte and Giorgio Orano , concern two areas of management by the government : on the one hand , the executive is accused of not having been able to deal with the emergency .
In the second strand , the complaints have been inserted in which crimes of abuse of office and attack against the political rights of the citizen for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lockdown .
We abolish the Civil Defense , repository of all corruption and trojan horse of the New World Order On July 23rd the newspapers finally published good news : three administrative judges of the TAR of Lazio ( ER : Lazio is a large region on Italy ’ s southern coast that includes the city of Rome itself ) , Mariangela Caminiti , Ines Simona Immacolata Pisano and Lucia Gizzi , have issued a ruling that requires the Presidency of the Council of Ministers and the Department of Civil Protection to make @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Committee ( CTS ) , according to which the Conte Government would take all the most important decisions to stage the “ State of Emergency ” , the lockdown , the arbitrary suspension of citizens ’ civil rights enshrined in the Constitution and all the repressive measures that we are familiar with and have experienced on our skin in recent months , from “ social distancing ” to muzzles .
Acts and minutes that had been secreted , however , without any objective justification and whose reading or knowledge has so far been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ parliamentarians , but even to members of the government themselves , as repeatedly complained about by the Deputy Minister of Health Pierpaolo Sileri .
All this happens as we approach July 31 , a day that ( at least formally ) should sanction the end of the State of Emergency imposed by Conte on Italy and the Italians last January .
A State of Emergency which , despite the increasingly massive raising of shields by hundreds of illustrious doctors , jurists , constitutionalists , university professors and intellectuals , will try until the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for “ health ” reasons , but to cover up their misdeeds , to prevent millionaires ’ affairs from going up in smoke and to continue to rule copying DPCM , in the total silence of the Quirinal and the so-called “ oppositions ” .
Last month the President of Belarus , Aljaksandr Lukashenko ( pictured ) , who is known to have always refused to take any emergency , lockdown or “ social distancing ” measures in his country , said at a press conference that he had received a substantial offer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the World Health Organization to do “ as in Italy ” .
An offer which , after Lukashenko ’ s dry ‘ no ’ , would have increased tenfold in a few weeks : 900 million dollars , this time offered by the International Monetary Fund , accompanied by the same request : to close everything and do “ as in Italy ” .
I know , from intelligence sources , that similar offers have been made to many other European and not only European countries .
And I also know that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ including the President of Serbia Aleksandar Vučić , did not hesitate for a moment to accept them .
Therefore , logic dictates that even Italy ( which , as we well know , has always played the role of a pilot model in this whole scene ) may have had a rich offer in this sense and , knowing the mentality of our politicians , I strongly doubt that it has not been accepted .
Moreover , this hypothesis could explain where and how the Conte Government found the resources destined ( probably @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) to the strengthening of the police forces in order to guarantee the holding and the success of the lockdown .
I sincerely hope that among the secret acts and minutes that the Lazio Regional Administrative Court has ordered to be made public , we can soon find the answer to this and many other unresolved issues , such as the crazy and inconceivable directive that “ discouraged ” autopsies .
( ER : we ’ ve heard about quick disposal of bodies without autopsies in other contexts , such as Canada , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ . )
It is , instead , today , even if it has been traced by the main newspapers , a sensational piece of news to say the least .
News that in a normal country would have caused many heads to roll if not the government itself : thanks to the courageous stance of the Covid Commission of the Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei and the insistence of Dr. Alberto Zangrillo ( ER : pictured , see here and here ) , what many already suspected has finally emerged : the Civil Protection @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the daily television war bulletins that kept millions of Italians nailed in front of the television screen were little more than a mere game of fantasy .
“ Elaborations in the absence of data ” were in fact technically defined .
Not even , therefore , projections of the type of those political or electoral ones , which , at least , a certain link to a certain objective numerical reality , albeit in an approximate manner , can have .
Translated from Politics , those numbers were solemnly a fraud without any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ climate of terror .
( ER : This was how French people were ‘ entertained ’ on the nightly news , too , for weeks on end , with grim readings of statistics that the population was simply held captive to , with no other point of reference . )
According to what Giorgio Parisi , President of the Accademia dei Lincei , said , only the self-styled “ scientific community ” ( read the Scientific Technical Committee wanted by Conte ) has access to authentic data , to real numbers : “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are missing for Covid .
How many are the actual infections , for how many days people were hospitalized , the real clinical picture of each of them .
You will remember that the numbers were never returned , both in comparison with other years and with the number of victims compared to 2015 , which in that year were over 50,000 , 15,000 more than today , without locking down the country .
There will be a downsizing of this obscure history , but we can already say one thing , that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has been subordinated to the will , at this point we can define it as fraudulent by the Scientific Committee , through the Civil Protection .
Here , the Higher Institute of Health is involved .
They have to explain to us why in France , Germany , Spain , Great Britain , to remain in the most demographically important countries , the data are in the public domain and here in Italy , they are not .
( ER : we must add that we are entirely uncertain as to the legitimacy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ published in any country .
Just this past week the UK has been walking back its statistics . )
Is it over ?
No way !
Minister Speranza , who should have explained the reason for this situation and the guilty lack of information on the actual data of the dead , infected , real danger of the virus , replied that we must ask the Istituto Superiore della Sanità .
But not even as a soldier , where the real barrels were unloaded on us and we were getting muscles , did @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But how !
You block Italy for six months , and it ’ s not over , of which , three , in lock down , and you come to tell us that we have to ask the Brusaferro gang for enlightenment ?
Millions of Italians are starving and millions more are gasping and you , Health Minister , tell us between the lines that you had nothing to do with it ?
What kind of a country we ’ ve become !
” .
Very strong statements , these of Prof. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ authoritative physicists in the world , which nails the Civil Protection to its responsibilities and requires us to reflect properly .
A reflection on Italy and Italians .
The Italian people are undoubtedly a strange people .
A people so lobotomized and shaped by decades of ideological conditioning to the point of being indignant at command and in alternating phases , as if it were a switch or an electrical transformer rather than a community of thinking heads .
In alternating phases , because the Italians in the last twenty years have been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the streets against injustice and the malfunctioning of the State only when the centre-right was at the helm of the country , then lining their eyes with ham and tacitly and supremely accepting any injustice when the left was in power .
In 2010 , just to give an example , while Silvio Berlusconi was the leader , for months the front pages of the newspapers reported the scandals in which the Civil Defence , led by Bertolaso at the time , was involved .
So much so that even the sociologist Stefano @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Worst Italy ( Civil Protection scandals ) , on February 17 of the same year in the newspaper Il Piccolo wrote : “ The muddy swamp into which the success story of Guido Bertolaso and his creature , the beloved and hated Civil Protection , is in itself a civil parable that should be meditated .
Already the fact that a meritorious public institution ( ER : Civil Protection agency ) , in which the voluntary work of many Italians gives its best , was about to turn into a joint @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of our time .
But the story that emerges is not a new story .
The intertwining of politics and business , and between malpolitics and mischief , which this story also shows us , are in continuity with too many other stories of the past .
And the interceptions are reminiscent of those among the sly men in the neighborhood , and many other investigations of this sad and vilified Italy .
Barracks ’ language , sexual favours , innuendoes , swearing , petty words and postulants , ‘ dwarves and dancers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ art , and then money , lots of money , of course public , and a great hunger to grab them : lots , cursed and immediately .
Up to the parody of the ‘ I keep family ’ made up of stratospheric salaries given to useless and incapable ‘ apprentices ’ , but appropriately ‘ children of ’ , and the presence of cumbersome brothers-in-law : for the moment there is a lack of devoted wives and protective mothers , but we do not despair .
It is not a new Italy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sad affair : it is the eternal and worst Italy .
An immobile society , in which the cliques in power are always those , the men who always decide the same , the plots and affairs always the same , and the usual way of conducting them .
But with a substantial worsening .
In the past there was at least the excuse of those who ‘ stole for the party ’ , and the problem of financing the costs of politics , with the exchange between favours and bribes , was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it became a system , it was considered a pathology .
Today , it has become physiology .
Nobody is scandalized anymore , and in less there is also the political justification , the high values that hide the low administrative practices .
Everything is done only for money , and without further excuses , without alibi .
In an impudent and even naive way .
Because that ’ s the way the world goes and there ’ s no alternative ” .
But everyone , as always unfortunately happens , looked at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Moon didn ’ t even see it .
Everybody was just indignant about the “ robberies ” and the scandal of dwarves and dancers ( especially if they emerged during the center-right governments ) , without considering the horrendous sprawling monster that such scandals and robberies generated and , even today more than ever , continues to generate .
The Italians , unfortunately , have never managed to have an overall view , wide-ranging and free from ideological prejudices .
If only yesterday , in fact , they were outraged by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bertolaso and “ his ” Civil Protection , today they are miserably silent in the face of the shameless lies and deceptions of the Civil Protection itself , which , from being a wagonload of advice and bribes that it has always been , has now turned into a real instrument of repression at the service of those same supranational powers that hold and direct the worst government in the history of republican Italy .
It would perhaps be superfluous to remind Italians that the “ State of Emergency ” does not exist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ possible application is provided for by an ordinary law , namely Law n. 225 of 24 February 1992 concerning the establishment of the National Service of Civil Protection .
And here opens the dam of ignorance about its application , but the most serious thing is that the “ state of exception ” is applicable mainly when it precedes a war .
The “ insiders ” know this , and they know it very well .
Law n. 225 established the National Service of Civil Protection , conferring to this body prerogatives and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ substantial way , only at an institutional level , by the Italian Army and the National Fire Brigade Corps.
, thus allowing also “ private ” and local authorities to participate in the necessary activities in case of emergencies and disasters .
But , as Keli Anand suggested to me this morning , when it is discovered that with the power attributed to the Civil Protection a small group of heterodox characters prevents the Constitutional Court from functioning , removing all control over the executive and finances of a State under the pretext @ @ @ @ @ @ @ maneuver of the “ Covid ” thus realized manifests itself for what it is : an orchestrated coup with tacit agreements by powers desperately seeking funds to carry out their plan .
In my opinion , therefore , the Civil Protection , from a repository of the worst Italian corruption , has now turned into a real Trojan horse of the New World Order and of those supranational powers that want the final destruction of Italy and the full and total political-economic enslavement of our people .
If there were still an “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its main objectives would have to be the repeal of Law no .
225 of 24 February 1992 , the closure of the National Civil Protection Service and the handing back of its prerogatives and tasks to the Army .
The problem is that in Italy in 2020 , the “ opposition ” no longer exists .
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com

Pam Barker | Director of TLB Europe Reloaded Project
The first article is dated August 13, 2020 from MSM site, La Repubblica. The second is a piece by Nicola Bizzi of the site Database Italia, the date of which is unclear but it had to be written between July 23 and July 31 according to its contents. Both articles were run through an automatic translator.
So, Italy’s senior government ministers are having lawsuits brought against them on various charges, according to the first piece, for their handling of the public health crisis. Chigi Palace is the residence of Italy’s PM, currently globalist technocrat Giuseppe Conte (pictured).
The second piece, far more interesting, gives a behind-the-scenes perspective, and mentions Belarusian President Aleksandr Lukashenko‘s revelations of the IMF doling out its largesse on condition of locking down a nation’s citizens, with the WHO and IMF working in tandem on this. Primarily, it reveals how the recommendations of Italy’s Technical Scientific Committee, advising the government over the handling of the virus, were never made public, not even to members of the Italian government. It also appears, up to the time of publication, that Italy has been under a medical state of emergency since January. July 31st, according to the writer, should have been the end date. Is Italy still under this emergency state?
Bizzi mentions ‘Civil Protection’ and ‘Civil Defence’ several times. The Civil Protection Department is an agency within the Italian government, under the PM’s control, which ‘deals with the prediction, prevention and management of emergency events’:
The duties of the Protezione Civile are to predict, prevent and manage at national level disasters and catastrophes, both natural and human-made. The main goal is to protect the sake of life, the properties, the settlements and the environment from damages and dangers.
He refers to its extensive corruption and many scandals below, calling it ultimately a trojan horse for the New World Order.
We wish the Italian plaintiffs in their cases all the best and hope such efforts bear fruit in other countries, too.
A shout-out to architect Robin Monotti Graziadei, whose Twitter account brought these articles to our attention:
********
Covid, notices of guarantee to Count and six ministers. The pm: to be filed. The PM: “I take political responsibility”
Chigi Palace: “Act due. Ready to cooperate with the judges”. The Public Prosecutor’s Office of Rome: “Unsubstantiated complaints.”
LA REPUBBLICA
Warranty notice [sic] from the pm [sic] of Rome against the Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte and Ministers Alfonso Bonafede, Luigi Di Maio, Roberto Gualtieri, Lorenzo Guerini, Luciana Lamorgese and Roberto Speranza. According to what is read in a note of the Council Presidency, this notice communicates the transmission to the Court of Ministers of the acts of a (legal) process born from various complaints from subjects in various parts of Italy for the crimes of epidemic, manslaughter against health, manslaughter, abuse of office, attack against the Constitution, attack against the political rights of the citizen (Articles 110, 438, 452 and 589, 323, 283, 294 of the Penal Code).
The note from Palazzo Chigi (Chigi Palace) also adds that the Rome Public Prosecutor’s Office will ask for the case to be dismissed: “The transmission by the Public Prosecutor’s Office to the College according to the provisions of the law, is a due act. In the specific case this transmission was accompanied by a report in which the Public Prosecutor’s Office ‘considers the news of the text unfounded and therefore to be archived'”.
Coronavirus, Salvini: “Warranty notice to the government? He has the dead on his conscience”
Furthermore, PM Conte and the ministers “declare themselves willing to provide the magistrates with all the elements necessary to complete the procedure, in a spirit of maximum cooperation”. Subsequently, the Prime Minister writes on Facebook:
“We have always taken responsibility, first and foremost ‘politics’, for the decisions taken. Very demanding decisions, sometimes painful, taken without having a manual, guidelines, protocols of action. We have always acted in science and conscience, without the pretension of being infallible, but in the awareness of having to make as few mistakes as possible to preserve the interests of the entire national community as best we can”.
(ER: This Facebook post of self-justification by Giuseppe Conte goes on at some length.)
As mentioned, there are more than two hundred complaints and complaints from citizens about the actions of the government during the lockdown and the Coronavirus emergency. The complaints, passed to the pm Eugenio Albamonte and Giorgio Orano, concern two areas of management by the government: on the one hand, the executive is accused of not having been able to deal with the emergency. In the second strand, the complaints have been inserted in which crimes of abuse of office and attack against the political rights of the citizen for the imposition of the rules related to the lockdown.
************
We abolish the Civil Defense, repository of all corruption and trojan horse of the New World Order
NICOLA BIZZI
On July 23rd the newspapers finally published good news: three administrative judges of the TAR of Lazio (ER: Lazio is a large region on Italy’s southern coast that includes the city of Rome itself), Mariangela Caminiti, Ines Simona Immacolata Pisano and Lucia Gizzi, have issued a ruling that requires the Presidency of the Council of Ministers and the Department of Civil Protection to make public the minutes of the Technical Scientific Committee (CTS), according to which the Conte Government would take all the most important decisions to stage the “State of Emergency”, the lockdown, the arbitrary suspension of citizens’ civil rights enshrined in the Constitution and all the repressive measures that we are familiar with and have experienced on our skin in recent months, from “social distancing” to muzzles. Acts and minutes that had been secreted, however, without any objective justification and whose reading or knowledge has so far been precluded and denied, not only to parliamentarians, but even to members of the government themselves, as repeatedly complained about by the Deputy Minister of Health Pierpaolo Sileri.
All this happens as we approach July 31, a day that (at least formally) should sanction the end of the State of Emergency imposed by Conte on Italy and the Italians last January. A State of Emergency which, despite the increasingly massive raising of shields by hundreds of illustrious doctors, jurists, constitutionalists, university professors and intellectuals, will try until the last moment to be extended, not for “health” reasons, but to cover up their misdeeds, to prevent millionaires’ affairs from going up in smoke and to continue to rule copying DPCM, in the total silence of the Quirinal and the so-called “oppositions”.
Last month the President of Belarus, Aljaksandr Lukashenko (pictured), who is known to have always refused to take any emergency, lockdown or “social distancing” measures in his country, said at a press conference that he had received a substantial offer of money (92 million dollars) from the World Health Organization to do “as in Italy”. An offer which, after Lukashenko’s dry ‘no’, would have increased tenfold in a few weeks: 900 million dollars, this time offered by the International Monetary Fund, accompanied by the same request: to close everything and do “as in Italy”. I know, from intelligence sources, that similar offers have been made to many other European and not only European countries. And I also know that many heads of state or governments, including the President of Serbia Aleksandar Vučić, did not hesitate for a moment to accept them. Therefore, logic dictates that even Italy (which, as we well know, has always played the role of a pilot model in this whole scene) may have had a rich offer in this sense and, knowing the mentality of our politicians, I strongly doubt that it has not been accepted. Moreover, this hypothesis could explain where and how the Conte Government found the resources destined (probably already at the beginning of the year) to the strengthening of the police forces in order to guarantee the holding and the success of the lockdown.
I sincerely hope that among the secret acts and minutes that the Lazio Regional Administrative Court has ordered to be made public, we can soon find the answer to this and many other unresolved issues, such as the crazy and inconceivable directive that “discouraged” autopsies. (ER: we’ve heard about quick disposal of bodies without autopsies in other contexts, such as Canada, from the work of journalist Rosemary Frei.)
It is, instead, today, even if it has been traced by the main newspapers, a sensational piece of news to say the least. News that in a normal country would have caused many heads to roll if not the government itself: thanks to the courageous stance of the Covid Commission of the Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei and the insistence of Dr. Alberto Zangrillo (ER: pictured, see here and here), what many already suspected has finally emerged: the Civil Protection tables and charts on which for months the daily television war bulletins that kept millions of Italians nailed in front of the television screen were little more than a mere game of fantasy. “Elaborations in the absence of data” were in fact technically defined. Not even, therefore, projections of the type of those political or electoral ones, which, at least, a certain link to a certain objective numerical reality, albeit in an approximate manner, can have. Translated from Politics, those numbers were solemnly a fraud without any foundation, useful only to generate a climate of terror. (ER: This was how French people were ‘entertained’ on the nightly news, too, for weeks on end, with grim readings of statistics that the population was simply held captive to, with no other point of reference.)
According to what Giorgio Parisi, President of the Accademia dei Lincei, said, only the self-styled “scientific community” (read the Scientific Technical Committee wanted by Conte) has access to authentic data, to real numbers: “We ignore when and how many people are missing for Covid. How many are the actual infections, for how many days people were hospitalized, the real clinical picture of each of them. You will remember that the numbers were never returned, both in comparison with other years and with the number of victims compared to 2015, which in that year were over 50,000, 15,000 more than today, without locking down the country. There will be a downsizing of this obscure history, but we can already say one thing, that the Government, therefore the Country, has been subordinated to the will, at this point we can define it as fraudulent by the Scientific Committee, through the Civil Protection. Here, the Higher Institute of Health is involved. They have to explain to us why in France, Germany, Spain, Great Britain, to remain in the most demographically important countries, the data are in the public domain and here in Italy, they are not. (ER: we must add that we are entirely uncertain as to the legitimacy of any data that’s been published in any country. Just this past week the UK has been walking back its statistics.)
Is it over? No way! Minister Speranza, who should have explained the reason for this situation and the guilty lack of information on the actual data of the dead, infected, real danger of the virus, replied that we must ask the Istituto Superiore della Sanità. But not even as a soldier, where the real barrels were unloaded on us and we were getting muscles, did I happen to hear such an answer. But how! You block Italy for six months, and it’s not over, of which, three, in lock down, and you come to tell us that we have to ask the Brusaferro gang for enlightenment? Millions of Italians are starving and millions more are gasping and you, Health Minister, tell us between the lines that you had nothing to do with it? What kind of a country we’ve become!”.
Very strong statements, these of Prof. Giorgio Parisi, one of the most authoritative physicists in the world, which nails the Civil Protection to its responsibilities and requires us to reflect properly. A reflection on Italy and Italians.
The Italian people are undoubtedly a strange people. A people so lobotomized and shaped by decades of ideological conditioning to the point of being indignant at command and in alternating phases, as if it were a switch or an electrical transformer rather than a community of thinking heads. In alternating phases, because the Italians in the last twenty years have been able to get indignant and take to the streets against injustice and the malfunctioning of the State only when the centre-right was at the helm of the country, then lining their eyes with ham and tacitly and supremely accepting any injustice when the left was in power.
In 2010, just to give an example, while Silvio Berlusconi was the leader, for months the front pages of the newspapers reported the scandals in which the Civil Defence, led by Bertolaso at the time, was involved. So much so that even the sociologist Stefano Allievi, in an article entitled Portrait of the Worst Italy (Civil Protection scandals), on February 17 of the same year in the newspaper Il Piccolo wrote: “The muddy swamp into which the success story of Guido Bertolaso and his creature, the beloved and hated Civil Protection, is in itself a civil parable that should be meditated. Already the fact that a meritorious public institution (ER: Civil Protection agency), in which the voluntary work of many Italians gives its best, was about to turn into a joint stock company, is a disturbing metaphor of our time. But the story that emerges is not a new story. The intertwining of politics and business, and between malpolitics and mischief, which this story also shows us, are in continuity with too many other stories of the past. And the interceptions are reminiscent of those among the sly men in the neighborhood, and many other investigations of this sad and vilified Italy. Barracks’ language, sexual favours, innuendoes, swearing, petty words and postulants, ‘dwarves and dancers’ and many other grotesque characters of art, and then money, lots of money, of course public, and a great hunger to grab them: lots, cursed and immediately. Up to the parody of the ‘I keep family’ made up of stratospheric salaries given to useless and incapable ‘apprentices’, but appropriately ‘children of’, and the presence of cumbersome brothers-in-law: for the moment there is a lack of devoted wives and protective mothers, but we do not despair.
It is not a new Italy, the one that emerges from this sad affair: it is the eternal and worst Italy. An immobile society, in which the cliques in power are always those, the men who always decide the same, the plots and affairs always the same, and the usual way of conducting them. But with a substantial worsening. In the past there was at least the excuse of those who ‘stole for the party’, and the problem of financing the costs of politics, with the exchange between favours and bribes, was posed as such. And even though it became a system, it was considered a pathology.
Today, it has become physiology. Nobody is scandalized anymore, and in less there is also the political justification, the high values that hide the low administrative practices. Everything is done only for money, and without further excuses, without alibi. In an impudent and even naive way. Because that’s the way the world goes and there’s no alternative”.
But everyone, as always unfortunately happens, looked at the finger pointing to the Moon and the Moon didn’t even see it. Everybody was just indignant about the “robberies” and the scandal of dwarves and dancers (especially if they emerged during the center-right governments), without considering the horrendous sprawling monster that such scandals and robberies generated and, even today more than ever, continues to generate. The Italians, unfortunately, have never managed to have an overall view, wide-ranging and free from ideological prejudices. If only yesterday, in fact, they were outraged by the robberies and sexual favours attributed to Guido Bertolaso and “his” Civil Protection, today they are miserably silent in the face of the shameless lies and deceptions of the Civil Protection itself, which, from being a wagonload of advice and bribes that it has always been, has now turned into a real instrument of repression at the service of those same supranational powers that hold and direct the worst government in the history of republican Italy.
It would perhaps be superfluous to remind Italians that the “State of Emergency” does not exist in our Constitutional Charter, but its possible application is provided for by an ordinary law, namely Law n. 225 of 24 February 1992 concerning the establishment of the National Service of Civil Protection. And here opens the dam of ignorance about its application, but the most serious thing is that the “state of exception” is applicable mainly when it precedes a war. The “insiders” know this, and they know it very well.
Law n. 225 established the National Service of Civil Protection, conferring to this body prerogatives and functions that were previously exercised in a substantial way, only at an institutional level, by the Italian Army and the National Fire Brigade Corps., thus allowing also “private” and local authorities to participate in the necessary activities in case of emergencies and disasters. But, as Keli Anand suggested to me this morning, when it is discovered that with the power attributed to the Civil Protection a small group of heterodox characters prevents the Constitutional Court from functioning, removing all control over the executive and finances of a State under the pretext of an “emergency”, this maneuver of the “Covid” thus realized manifests itself for what it is: an orchestrated coup with tacit agreements by powers desperately seeking funds to carry out their plan.
In my opinion, therefore, the Civil Protection, from a repository of the worst Italian corruption, has now turned into a real Trojan horse of the New World Order and of those supranational powers that want the final destruction of Italy and the full and total political-economic enslavement of our people.
If there were still an “opposition” in Parliament, one of its main objectives would have to be the repeal of Law no. 225 of 24 February 1992, the closure of the National Civil Protection Service and the handing back of its prerogatives and tasks to the Army. The problem is that in Italy in 2020, the “opposition” no longer exists.
************
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-08-17--Russian hackers blamed for terror meltdown

Millions cheer up as world shaken by optimism Governments and their pharmaceutical employers the world over have been fighting a losing battle against the recent epidemic of people not being scared .
These and other hard-pressed terrorist organisations have consequently found themselves with their backs to the wall , desperately defending civilisation as we know it against the remorseless march of things not being as bad as they were cracked up to be .
Fear , particularly the constant background dread of something nebulously menacing being about to happen , has long since been scientifically proven to be an indispensable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , keeping chaos at bay is impossible because people allowed to develop minds of their own will inevitably kill everybody , well everybody important anyway , such as the government .
This was scientifically proven to be true by expert mathematicians at the Imperial College , famed for predictions accurate to a pinpoint margin of error of only plus or minus 4000 percent .
The Imperial team , led by Professor Knott-Exaggeratin , have mathematically predicted using sums and equations only really brainy people put much faith in , that : This has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s complete satisfaction by dozens of stringent press releases .
Sadly , the entire Imperial team were lost along with all their research notes when their camper van spontaneously combusted on the M25 last Tuesday whilst returning from a Really Hard Sums Convention in Spalding .
The loss of the all-important Fear Factor , most noticeable during the recent “ COVID19 ” flu outbreak when millions of people maliciously refused to be intimated into reaching what epidemiologists call “ herd mentality ” , the point at which the aristocracy become naturally immune to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ infections .
Searching for the cause of this strange phenomenon , researchers eventually isolated Russian hackers viciously seeding the internet with optimism using seditious viral messages .
At least a hundred of these messages were identified and it was soon realised that they had spread and multiplied via posts , tweets , chirps , warbles and poots into billions of news feeds and from news feeds they had quickly crossed the social network/brain barrier and were responsible for rendering millions of people quite chirpy when they had no right to be .
Such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ eye , had an underlying carefully installed meaning that caused severe gladdening or heartening symptoms in all those who “ tested positive ” or even “ slightly less negative ” .
Examples of these are : “ Things aren ’ t as bad as they are saying.
” “ Don ’ t let the bastards get you down.
” The public were warned to watch out for these and similar messages and to maintain a healthy distance by deleting them on sight or , better still , isolate oneself from the internet for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Unit for National Security ( CUNS ) Weaponised Fibbing Division , reporting directly to the Prime Minister during a break from filming the latest episode of The Muppets , described the hacking campaign as , “ a deliberate effort to undermine centuries of effort on the part of the nation ’ s Very Best People to bring to the riffraff the kind of pessimism and lack of self esteem that has made Britain a truly great former third-rate power.
” Further investigation has revealed that this attack on civilisation is , incredibly , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they have revealed his identity to be a V. Putin .
Based in Moscow , Putin is wanted for a string of serious crimes against globalism , including running Russia , being there and upsetting George Soros .
The above is republished from The Daily Scare , which is fact-checked regularly to ensure all facts have been removed .
Visit The Daily Scare now for fact-free news It was originally featured on UK Reloaded The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

Millions cheer up as world shaken by optimism
by Steve Cook
Reykjavik 13/8/2020
Governments and their pharmaceutical employers the world over have been fighting a losing battle against the recent epidemic of people not being scared. These and other hard-pressed terrorist organisations have consequently found themselves with their backs to the wall, desperately defending civilisation as we know it against the remorseless march of things not being as bad as they were cracked up to be.
Fear, particularly the constant background dread of something nebulously menacing being about to happen, has long since been scientifically proven to be an indispensable component of sound governance.
Without it, keeping chaos at bay is impossible because people allowed to develop minds of their own will inevitably kill everybody, well everybody important anyway, such as the government.
This was scientifically proven to be true by expert mathematicians at the Imperial College, famed for predictions accurate to a pinpoint margin of error of only plus or minus 4000 percent. The Imperial team, led by Professor Knott-Exaggeratin, have mathematically predicted using sums and equations only really brainy people put much faith in, that:
“without the calming effect of fear or at least a healthy loss of self-belief, a hundred million civil servants, politicians and corporate pirates could be killed by crazed Brits and other rebel factions in Chelmsford alone.”
This has since been confirmed to the government’s complete satisfaction by dozens of stringent press releases.
Sadly, the entire Imperial team were lost along with all their research notes when their camper van spontaneously combusted on the M25 last Tuesday whilst returning from a Really Hard Sums Convention in Spalding.
The loss of the all-important Fear Factor, most noticeable during the recent “COVID19” flu outbreak when millions of people maliciously refused to be intimated into reaching what epidemiologists call “herd mentality”, the point at which the aristocracy become naturally immune to justice, retribution and other often fatal infections.
Searching for the cause of this strange phenomenon, researchers eventually isolated Russian hackers viciously seeding the internet with optimism using seditious viral messages.
At least a hundred of these messages were identified and it was soon realised that they had spread and multiplied via posts, tweets, chirps, warbles and poots into billions of news feeds and from news feeds they had quickly crossed the social network/brain barrier and were responsible for rendering millions of people quite chirpy when they had no right to be.
Such messages, appearing innocuous to the naked eye, had an underlying carefully installed meaning that caused severe gladdening or heartening symptoms in all those who “tested positive” or even “slightly less negative”.
Examples of these are:
“Let’s all cheer up a bit”
“Things aren’t as bad as they are saying.”
“We’ve known worse.”
“Don’t let the bastards get you down.”
The public were warned to watch out for these and similar messages and to maintain a healthy distance by deleting them on sight or, better still, isolate oneself from the internet for the next 20 years.
The Central Unit for National Security (CUNS) Weaponised Fibbing Division, reporting directly to the Prime Minister during a break from filming the latest episode of The Muppets, described the hacking campaign as,
“a deliberate effort to undermine centuries of effort on the part of the nation’s Very Best People to bring to the riffraff the kind of pessimism and lack of self esteem that has made Britain a truly great former third-rate power.”
Further investigation has revealed that this attack on civilisation is, incredibly, the work of a single hacker and they have revealed his identity to be a V. Putin.
Based in Moscow, Putin is wanted for a string of serious crimes against globalism, including running Russia, being there and upsetting George Soros.
The above is republished from The Daily Scare, which is fact-checked regularly to ensure all facts have been removed.
Visit The Daily Scare now for fact-free news
*****
It was originally featured on UK Reloaded
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.