thelibertybeacon--2020-12-31--Coming Attractions for January Sixth

Coming Attractions for January Sixth

Here are updates related to January 6th when a joint session of Congress will meet to vote on the Electoral College results .
( Depending on how things unfold , there may be some surprises .
Some could be quite shocking .
More on that further down on the blog . )
On January 6th , members of Trump ’ s legal team hope to present their case of massive voter fraud to Congress and the American people .
I presume they ’ ve been sharing information with Congress for weeks now , but on the 6th it will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ platform to speak to the public .
At least as far as I understand things .
On that same day , dozens of speakers will be on stage before a massive crowd , challenging the election results , standing with President Trump , and standing for the Constitution .
Inside the hallowed corrupt halls of Congress , twenty Congressmen have pledged to challenge the Electoral College vote .
Numerous incoming representatives will be doing so , as well .
All of them should be sworn in on January 3rd , barring any unforeseen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ AL ) , Jerry Carl ( AL ) , Marjorie Taylor Greene ( GA ) , Andrew Clyde ( GA ) , Madison Cawthorn ( NC ) , Burgess Owens ( UT ) , Yvette Herrell ( NM ) , Lauren Boebert ( CO ) , Dr. Ronny Jackson ( TX ) , and Bob Good ( VA ) .
The numbers have been growing but are still paltry compared to the number of Republicans in Congress .
Please contact your representative to apply pressure on them to challenge the votes .
Over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Senator had made a commitment to challenge the votes until yesterday when Josh Hawley announced that he would .
As of this writing , he remains one out of fifty-three .
Please contact your Senator ( s ) to urge them to join Senator Hawley .
And please don ’ t complain that they don ’ t care .
Momentum is building and we should do everything we can to keep shifting the tide .
And as we all know , the tide is quite strong against us , which means we have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Case in point : Yesterday , incoming Congressional representative Marjorie Taylor Greene sent out the following tweet : Word on the Hill is that Mitch McConnell and Nancy Pelosi could be working together on a rules change “ deal ” to block our Electoral College Certification objection .
I haven ’ t been able to corroborate her assertion , but let ’ s face it , none of us would find it surprising .
Meanwhile , patriots from around the country have started their journey to D.C. including Emmy-award winning news reporter and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ California en route to D.C. a couple of days ago and will be traveling through Arizona , Texas , Oklahoma , Arkansas , Tennessee , and Virginia , documenting the trip and the protest at the Capitol .
( If you ’ d like to support his work and help cover the cost of expenses , there ’ s a link to a GoFundMe page here . )
You can also check out this link to a 1-minute promo video ( below ) for the Stop the Steal rally .
If you scroll @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ll hear from people traveling to D.C. from all corners of the country .
More details about the protest will continue to roll out over the coming days .
Meanwhile , Lara Trump gave an interview yesterday and said the following ( transcription shared at The Gateway Pundit ) : …the founders of this country set up a process for a time such as this .
So , what will happen on January 6th is a joint session of Congress .
And all of the electoral votes have now been sent to Washington @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Vice President Mike Pence and read aloud for the joint session of congress .
And if two House members object to the vote for Joe Biden , just two , then everybody takes a break .
They split up then the Senate and the House divide .
They go debate and then they ultimately have to vote to decide the outcome of this election .
Now , here ’ s where it gets really interesting .
Each senator gets one vote .
Now we know , we ’ ve been talking about what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how important it is to hold a majority in the senate but we do right now have the majority in the senate .
And don ’ t forget the vice president also counts as a senate vote .
And then as far as the House is concerned it is each delegation .
So that doesn ’ t mean each House member gets a vote .
It ’ s each delegation , so each state ultimately gets a vote .
So , what ’ s really interesting about this Dr. Gina , the Republicans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ votes .
The Democrats are in control of only 20 .
So if it comes down to a vote and the Republicans in the House and the Senate decide gosh there was so much fraud in this election .
We have evidence of it .
We have affidavits , thousands of them .
So the campaign has gotten , we have evidence that more people voted in the state of Pennsylvania than even were registered to vote .
Thousands of dead people voting .
And for whatever reason they decide they will not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vote for Donald Trump .
Then guess what ?
Donald Trump remains president of the United States for the next four years .
For anyone interested in what Donald Trump may have in mind as he continues to fight for the integrity of this election and the survival of our republic , I recommend watching this video .
Civil rights attorney Leigh Dundas reviews a wide range of events that have unfolded within the Trump administration recently that she weaves together in a compelling way and that point to the potential for action @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be shocking .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

Coming Attractions for January 6th
By: Carol Brown
Here are updates related to January 6th when a joint session of Congress will meet to vote on the Electoral College results. (Depending on how things unfold, there may be some surprises. Some could be quite shocking. More on that further down on the blog.)
On January 6th, members of Trump’s legal team hope to present their case of massive voter fraud to Congress and the American people. I presume they’ve been sharing information with Congress for weeks now, but on the 6th it will be official and they will also have a platform to speak to the public. At least as far as I understand things.
On that same day, dozens of speakers will be on stage before a massive crowd, challenging the election results, standing with President Trump, and standing for the Constitution.
Inside the hallowed corrupt halls of Congress, twenty Congressmen have pledged to challenge the Electoral College vote. Numerous incoming representatives will be doing so, as well. All of them should be sworn in on January 3rd, barring any unforeseen circumstances. They include Barry Moore (AL), Jerry Carl (AL), Marjorie Taylor Greene (GA), Andrew Clyde (GA), Madison Cawthorn (NC), Burgess Owens (UT), Yvette Herrell (NM), Lauren Boebert (CO), Dr. Ronny Jackson (TX), and Bob Good (VA). The numbers have been growing but are still paltry compared to the number of Republicans in Congress. Please contact your representative to apply pressure on them to challenge the votes.
Over in the Senate, not a single Senator had made a commitment to challenge the votes until yesterday when Josh Hawley announced that he would. As of this writing, he remains one out of fifty-three. Please contact your Senator(s) to urge them to join Senator Hawley.
And please don’t complain that they don’t care. Momentum is building and we should do everything we can to keep shifting the tide.
And as we all know, the tide is quite strong against us, which means we have to be all that more determined. Case in point: Yesterday, incoming Congressional representative Marjorie Taylor Greene sent out the following tweet:
Word on the Hill is that Mitch McConnell and Nancy Pelosi could be working together on a rules change “deal” to block our Electoral College Certification objection.
I haven’t been able to corroborate her assertion, but let’s face it, none of us would find it surprising.
Meanwhile, patriots from around the country have started their journey to D.C. including Emmy-award winning news reporter and investigative journalist John Spiropoulos. He left California en route to D.C. a couple of days ago and will be traveling through Arizona, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Tennessee, and Virginia, documenting the trip and the protest at the Capitol. (If you’d like to support his work and help cover the cost of expenses, there’s a link to a GoFundMe page here.)
You can also check out this link to a 1-minute promo video (below) for the Stop the Steal rally. If you scroll through some of the comments you’ll hear from people traveling to D.C. from all corners of the country.
More details about the protest will continue to roll out over the coming days.
Meanwhile, Lara Trump gave an interview yesterday and said the following (transcription shared at The Gateway Pundit):
…the founders of this country set up a process for a time such as this. So, what will happen on January 6th is a joint session of Congress. And all of the electoral votes have now been sent to Washington DC. They will be opened by Vice President Mike Pence and read aloud for the joint session of congress. And if two House members object to the vote for Joe Biden, just two, then everybody takes a break. They split up then the Senate and the House divide. They go debate and then they ultimately have to vote to decide the outcome of this election. Now, here’s where it gets really interesting. Each senator gets one vote. Now we know, we’ve been talking about what we’ve just been talking about how important it is to hold a majority in the senate but we do right now have the majority in the senate. And don’t forget the vice president also counts as a senate vote. And then as far as the House is concerned it is each delegation. So that doesn’t mean each House member gets a vote. It’s each delegation, so each state ultimately gets a vote. So, what’s really interesting about this Dr. Gina, the Republicans are in control of 30 of those votes. The Democrats are in control of only 20. So if it comes down to a vote and the Republicans in the House and the Senate decide gosh there was so much fraud in this election. We have evidence of it. We have affidavits, thousands of them. So the campaign has gotten, we have evidence that more people voted in the state of Pennsylvania than even were registered to vote. Thousands of dead people voting. And for whatever reason they decide they will not certify this for Joe Biden and they vote for Donald Trump. Then guess what? Donald Trump remains president of the United States for the next four years.
For anyone interested in what Donald Trump may have in mind as he continues to fight for the integrity of this election and the survival of our republic, I recommend watching this video. Civil rights attorney Leigh Dundas reviews a wide range of events that have unfolded within the Trump administration recently that she weaves together in a compelling way and that point to the potential for action from Trump and his administration that may be shocking.
••••
••••
TLB Note: Videos inserted by TLB
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-31--Gunshots and Motorcycle Deaths Count as COVID Casualties

An analysis of excess deaths in England in October 2020 found deaths were only 1 % higher than expected , and many of them were due to heart disease , stroke and diabetes ; deaths in the home not related to COVID increased , possibly because people were afraid to seek medical care during the pandemic By December 2020 , Washington ’ s DOH had responded by subtracting more than 200 deaths from its COVID-19 fatality count , but analysis suggests their fatality counts may still be too high Washington state was accused of inflating COVID-19 deaths by up to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Foundation , the state ’ s Department of Health was counting every death in a person who had previously tested positive for COVID-19 as related to the virus In Grand County , Colorado , five COVID-19 deaths were reported , but according to coroner Brenda Bock , two of them were actually deaths from gunshot wounds The number of COVID-19 deaths may be skewed , as health officials may count deaths from unrelated causes — even gunshots and motorcycle accidents — as COVID-19 deaths if the person had the virus within the last @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic , families have been separated , businesses have been shuttered and schools have been closed down .
Many people are living their lives shrouded in fear of Sars-CoV-2 , the virus that causes COVID-19 — a direct response to media coverage and health officials ’ claims of its dire associated risks .
Understanding the real risks , and being able to make choices on how to live your life in response to them , is only possible , however , if you have real facts , like how many have died from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ actually is .
Is it a lethal virus that warrants lockdowns and panic , or is it one more akin to influenza , which can indeed be deadly but , in most cases , is not ?
Early on during the pandemic , COVID-19 infection mortality rate claims varied from 2.7 % to 7 % , with most being in the 4 % range .
But according to some experts , the actual infection mortality rate may be much lower , ranging from 0.05 % to 1 % , with a median of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 deaths may also be skewed , as health officials may count deaths from unrelated causes — even gunshots and motorcycle accidents — as COVID-19 deaths if the person had the virus within the last 30 days.2 In Grand County , Colorado , five COVID-19 deaths were reported , but according to coroner Brenda Bock , two of them were actually deaths from gunshot wounds .
Speaking to CBS4 News , Bock spoke out against the misleading classifications , as the deaths from gunshot wounds were counted as COVID-19 deaths because the victims @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The distinction comes down to some tricky working : deaths “ among ” COVID-19 cases and deaths “ due to ” COVID-19 .
Someone who died with COVID-19 may be counted as a death among COVID-19 cases , even if the virus had nothing to do with their death .
When a death is said to be “ due to ” COVID-19 , this is intended when COVID-19 caused or significantly contributed to the death .
According to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment , even deaths among COVID-19 cases must @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) : But according to Bock , the inflated numbers could hurt the region ’ s economy , which is largely dependent on tourism : Washington state was also accused of inflating COVID-19 deaths , by up to 13 % .
According to the Freedom Foundation , the state ’ s Department of Health was counting every death in a person who had previously tested positive for COVID-19 as related to the virus .
While the governor denied the inflation , internal emails revealed in May 2020 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) was , in fact , counting deaths in their official COVID death numbers that weren ’ t directly due to the virus.5 By December 2020 , Washington ’ s DOH had responded by subtracting more than 200 deaths from its COVID-19 fatality count after “ methodological improvements.
” However , a Freedom Foundation analysis suggests their fatality counts are still too high .
And if this is going on in Washington , it ’ s likely happening in other states and countries as well .
According to the analysis , some of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s “ COVID-19 deaths ” include the following:6 Another misleading instance occurred in Orlando , Florida , where a man in his 20s who died in a motorcycle accident was initially counted as a COVID-19 death because he had tested positive .
In a significant stretch , Orange County health officer Dr. Raul Pino told FOX 35 News , “ [ Yo ] u could actually argue that it could have been the COVID-19 that caused him to crash.
” 7 That death was reportedly removed from the official count , but how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ April 2020 , Dr. Ngozi Ezike , director of the Illinois Department of Public Health , also detailed the loose case definition being used for COVID-19 deaths : Michael Yeadon , Ph.D. , a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug company Pfizer and founder and CEO of the biotech company Ziarco , now owned by Novartis , said in an interview , “ You can not have a lethal pandemic stalking the land and not have excess deaths.
” Yet , excess deaths on the level of a lethal pandemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1,700 people die each day in the U.K. in any given year , Yeadon says — but many of these deaths are now falsely attributed to COVID-19 .
“ I ’ m calling out the statistics , and even the claim that there is an ongoing pandemic , as false , ” he said , noting that the definition of a “ coronavirus death ” in the U.K. is anyone who dies , from any cause , within 28 days of a positive COVID-19 test .
In the U.S. , it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 22 , 2020 , the provisional total death count from all causes , according to the CDC , is 2,835,533.9 For comparison , the total number of deaths from all causes in 2018 was 2,839,20510 while in 2019 it was 2,854,838.11 Some estimates suggested that 2020 deaths may top 3.2 million when all the final figures are added up,12 but how many of those deaths are directly attributable to COVID-19 ?
According to Yeadon , some of the slight uptick in deaths being presorted in the U.K. — primarily people aged 45 to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sexes — are mainly from heart disease , stroke and cancer , which suggests they are excess deaths caused by inaccessibility of routine medical care as people are either afraid of or discouraged from going to the hospital .
These deaths may be characterized as being COVID related , but that ’ s only because they have been falsely lumped into that category due to a positive test being recorded within 28 days of death .
In the U.S. , other deaths have also increased , including , according to Robert Anderson of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of deaths from certain types of heart and circulatory diseases , diabetes and dementia.
” 13 Drug overdose deaths are also at record numbers .
According to the AP , in late December 2020 , “ the CDC reported more than 81,000 drug overdose deaths in the 12 months ending in May , making it the highest number ever recorded in a one-year period.
” 14 Another curiosity in 2020 is what happened to the flu .
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) tracks influenza ( flu ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Center for Health Statistics ( NCHS ) Mortality Reporting System .
But , “ April 4 , 2020 was the last week in-season preliminary burden estimates were provided , ” the CDC wrote on its 2019-2020 U.S. flu season webpage.15 The reason the estimates stopped in April is because flu cases plummeted so low that they ’ re hardly worth tracking .
In an update posted December 3 , 2020 , the CDC stated : They also added , “ The number of hospitalizations estimated so far this season is lower than end-of-season @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CDC began making these estimates.
” 17 Meanwhile , the “ COVID ” deaths the CDC has been reporting are actually a combination of pneumonia , flu and COVID deaths , under a new category listed as “ PIC ” ( Pneumonia , Influenza , COVID ) .
Their COVIDView webpage , which provides a weekly surveillance summary of U.S. COVID-19 activity , states that levels of SARS-CoV-2 and “ associated illnesses ” have been increasing since September 2020 , while the percentage of deaths due to pneumonia , flu and COVID-19 has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ noted by professor William M. Briggs , a statistical consultant and policy advisor at The Heartland Institute , a free-market think tank , “ CDC , up until about July 2020 , counted flu and pneumonia deaths separately , been doing this forever , then just mysteriously stopped … It ’ s become very difficult to tell the difference between these , ” 19 referring to the combined tracking of deaths from “ PIC.
” Dr. Reid Sheftall has also suggested that COVID-19 fatality rates may be inflated , by about 40 times @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a biochemical engineer with a background in medical device engineering,20 he said selection bias was being used in the counting of cases , and organizations such as the World Health Organization ( WHO ) and CDC were drastically undercounting the number of people who were infected , which inflated the mortality rate .
Sheftall looked for data in which every case had been counted , ending up with a cruise ship , in which every person had been tested , and a small town in Germany that had also tested all residents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the infection fatality rate came out to 0.14 % , so I knew … there were some gross errors going on.
” Sheftall cited COVID-19 survival rates by age , posted by the CDC September 10 , 2020 , which are as follows:21 This translates into a 0.1 % infection fatality rate , using the CDC ’ s own numbers .
More than 224.5 million COVID-19 tests have been conducted in the U.S,22 which includes an unknown number of tests conducted on people with no symptoms .
The costs for such testing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ purpose , according to Sheftall , particularly for asymptomatic people .
“ The whole basis of medicine , ” he says , is to test people with symptoms so you can find out what ’ s wrong and treat them accordingly : What ’ s more , positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction ( RT-PCR ) tests have proven remarkably unreliable with high false result rates , and a positive test does not mean that an active infection is present .
Fear May Be Causing More Deaths Taken together , what ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reported is that there ’ s a lot of room for error and misinterpretation .
Solid analysis of any “ excess ” deaths being attributed to COVID-19 are needed before policy decisions are made .
When this was done in England in October 2020 , deaths were only 1 % higher than expected , and many of them were due to heart disease , stroke and diabetes .
“ Notably ” fewer deaths due to respiratory conditions and acute respiratory infections were found , yet deaths occurring in homes due to non-COVID-causes increased @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the fear being propagated in relation to COVID-19 .
According to the study ,

An analysis of excess deaths in England in October 2020 found deaths were only 1% higher than expected, and many of them were due to heart disease, stroke and diabetes; deaths in the home not related to COVID increased, possibly because people were afraid to seek medical care during the pandemic
By December 2020, Washington’s DOH had responded by subtracting more than 200 deaths from its COVID-19 fatality count, but analysis suggests their fatality counts may still be too high
Washington state was accused of inflating COVID-19 deaths by up to 13%; according to the Freedom Foundation, the state’s Department of Health was counting every death in a person who had previously tested positive for COVID-19 as related to the virus
In Grand County, Colorado, five COVID-19 deaths were reported, but according to coroner Brenda Bock, two of them were actually deaths from gunshot wounds
The number of COVID-19 deaths may be skewed, as health officials may count deaths from unrelated causes — even gunshots and motorcycle accidents — as COVID-19 deaths if the person had the virus within the last 30 days
Analysis by: Dr. Joseph Mercola
Since COVID-19 was declared a pandemic, families have been separated, businesses have been shuttered and schools have been closed down. Many people are living their lives shrouded in fear of Sars-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 — a direct response to media coverage and health officials’ claims of its dire associated risks.
Understanding the real risks, and being able to make choices on how to live your life in response to them, is only possible, however, if you have real facts, like how many have died from the virus and what the death rate actually is. Is it a lethal virus that warrants lockdowns and panic, or is it one more akin to influenza, which can indeed be deadly but, in most cases, is not?
Early on during the pandemic, COVID-19 infection mortality rate claims varied from 2.7% to 7%, with most being in the 4% range. But according to some experts, the actual infection mortality rate may be much lower, ranging from 0.05% to 1%, with a median of about 0.25%.1
The number of COVID-19 deaths may also be skewed, as health officials may count deaths from unrelated causes — even gunshots and motorcycle accidents — as COVID-19 deaths if the person had the virus within the last 30 days.2
Are COVID-19 Deaths Being Inflated?
In Grand County, Colorado, five COVID-19 deaths were reported, but according to coroner Brenda Bock, two of them were actually deaths from gunshot wounds. Speaking to CBS4 News, Bock spoke out against the misleading classifications, as the deaths from gunshot wounds were counted as COVID-19 deaths because the victims had tested positive within 30 days.
The distinction comes down to some tricky working: deaths “among” COVID-19 cases and deaths “due to” COVID-19. Someone who died with COVID-19 may be counted as a death among COVID-19 cases, even if the virus had nothing to do with their death. When a death is said to be “due to” COVID-19, this is intended when COVID-19 caused or significantly contributed to the death.
According to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, even deaths among COVID-19 cases must be reported to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC):
“This information is required by the CDC and is crucial for public health surveillance, as it provides more information about disease transmission and can help identify risk factors among all deaths across populations.”3
But according to Bock, the inflated numbers could hurt the region’s economy, which is largely dependent on tourism:
“It’s absurd that they would even put that on there. Would you want to go to a county that has really high death numbers? Would you want to go visit that county because they are contagious? You know I might get it, and I could die if all of a sudden one county has a high death count. We don’t have it, and we don’t need those numbers inflated.”4
Hundreds of ‘COVID-19 Deaths’ Subtracted in Washington
Washington state was also accused of inflating COVID-19 deaths, by up to 13%. According to the Freedom Foundation, the state’s Department of Health was counting every death in a person who had previously tested positive for COVID-19 as related to the virus.
While the governor denied the inflation, internal emails revealed in May 2020 that the Department of Health (DOH) was, in fact, counting deaths in their official COVID death numbers that weren’t directly due to the virus.5
By December 2020, Washington’s DOH had responded by subtracting more than 200 deaths from its COVID-19 fatality count after “methodological improvements.” However, a Freedom Foundation analysis suggests their fatality counts are still too high. And if this is going on in Washington, it’s likely happening in other states and countries as well.
According to the analysis, some of the questionable examples of the DOH’s “COVID-19 deaths” include the following:6
A 64-year-old male who died of an “acute combined fentanyl, heroin, methamphetamine, as well as methadone intoxication” A 65-year-old male who died from “alcoholic liver disease” A 69-year-old male with Parkinson’s disease and vascular dementia who died from malnutrition/dehydration after refusing to eat A 73-year-old female with underlying health conditions who died after declining treatment for an intestinal abscess A 75-year-old-male who died following a “pacemaker infection” A 99-year-old female who died after losing her balance and falling while trying to retrieve an item from the top of her dresser
Motorcycle Death Initially Counted as COVID-19 Death
Another misleading instance occurred in Orlando, Florida, where a man in his 20s who died in a motorcycle accident was initially counted as a COVID-19 death because he had tested positive. In a significant stretch, Orange County health officer Dr. Raul Pino told FOX 35 News, “[Yo]u could actually argue that it could have been the COVID-19 that caused him to crash.”7
That death was reportedly removed from the official count, but how many others weren’t? In April 2020, Dr. Ngozi Ezike, director of the Illinois Department of Public Health, also detailed the loose case definition being used for COVID-19 deaths:
“If you were in hospice and had already been given a few weeks to live, and then you also were found to have COVID, that would be counted as a COVID death. It means technically even if you died of a clear alternate cause, but you had COVID at the same time, it’s still listed as a COVID death.
So, everyone who’s listed as a COVID death doesn’t mean that that was the cause of the death, but they had COVID at the time of the death.”8
Are Total Deaths in 2020 Excessive?
Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug company Pfizer and founder and CEO of the biotech company Ziarco, now owned by Novartis, said in an interview, “You cannot have a lethal pandemic stalking the land and not have excess deaths.” Yet, excess deaths on the level of a lethal pandemic just aren’t occurring.
About 1,700 people die each day in the U.K. in any given year, Yeadon says — but many of these deaths are now falsely attributed to COVID-19. “I’m calling out the statistics, and even the claim that there is an ongoing pandemic, as false,” he said, noting that the definition of a “coronavirus death” in the U.K. is anyone who dies, from any cause, within 28 days of a positive COVID-19 test.
In the U.S., it’s a similar story. As of December 22, 2020, the provisional total death count from all causes, according to the CDC, is 2,835,533.9 For comparison, the total number of deaths from all causes in 2018 was 2,839,20510 while in 2019 it was 2,854,838.11
Some estimates suggested that 2020 deaths may top 3.2 million when all the final figures are added up,12 but how many of those deaths are directly attributable to COVID-19?
According to Yeadon, some of the slight uptick in deaths being presorted in the U.K. — primarily people aged 45 to 65, with equal distribution between the sexes — are mainly from heart disease, stroke and cancer, which suggests they are excess deaths caused by inaccessibility of routine medical care as people are either afraid of or discouraged from going to the hospital.
These deaths may be characterized as being COVID related, but that’s only because they have been falsely lumped into that category due to a positive test being recorded within 28 days of death. In the U.S., other deaths have also increased, including, according to Robert Anderson of the CDC, “an unexpected number of deaths from certain types of heart and circulatory diseases, diabetes and dementia.”13
Drug overdose deaths are also at record numbers. According to the AP, in late December 2020, “the CDC reported more than 81,000 drug overdose deaths in the 12 months ending in May, making it the highest number ever recorded in a one-year period.”14
Flu Deaths Disappear
Another curiosity in 2020 is what happened to the flu. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) tracks influenza (flu) and pneumonia deaths weekly through the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Mortality Reporting System. But, “April 4, 2020 was the last week in-season preliminary burden estimates were provided,” the CDC wrote on its 2019-2020 U.S. flu season webpage.15
The reason the estimates stopped in April is because flu cases plummeted so low that they’re hardly worth tracking. In an update posted December 3, 2020, the CDC stated:
“The model used to generate influenza in-season preliminary burden estimates uses current season flu hospitalization data. Reported flu hospitalizations are too low at this time to generate an estimate.”16
They also added, “The number of hospitalizations estimated so far this season is lower than end-of-season total hospitalization estimates for any season since CDC began making these estimates.”17 Meanwhile, the “COVID” deaths the CDC has been reporting are actually a combination of pneumonia, flu and COVID deaths, under a new category listed as “PIC” (Pneumonia, Influenza, COVID).
Their COVIDView webpage, which provides a weekly surveillance summary of U.S. COVID-19 activity, states that levels of SARS-CoV-2 and “associated illnesses” have been increasing since September 2020, while the percentage of deaths due to pneumonia, flu and COVID-19 has been on the rise since October.18
As noted by professor William M. Briggs, a statistical consultant and policy advisor at The Heartland Institute, a free-market think tank, “CDC, up until about July 2020, counted flu and pneumonia deaths separately, been doing this forever, then just mysteriously stopped … It’s become very difficult to tell the difference between these,”19 referring to the combined tracking of deaths from “PIC.”
Selection Bias and Problems With Testing
Dr. Reid Sheftall has also suggested that COVID-19 fatality rates may be inflated, by about 40 times. In an interview with Ivor Cummins, a biochemical engineer with a background in medical device engineering,20 he said selection bias was being used in the counting of cases, and organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and CDC were drastically undercounting the number of people who were infected, which inflated the mortality rate.
Sheftall looked for data in which every case had been counted, ending up with a cruise ship, in which every person had been tested, and a small town in Germany that had also tested all residents. “When I crunched the numbers, the infection fatality rate came out to 0.14%, so I knew … there were some gross errors going on.” Sheftall cited COVID-19 survival rates by age, posted by the CDC September 10, 2020, which are as follows:21
Ages 0 to 19: 99.997%
Ages 20 to 49: 99.98%
Ages 50 to 69: 99.5%
Ages 70 and up: 94.6%
This translates into a 0.1% infection fatality rate, using the CDC’s own numbers. More than 224.5 million COVID-19 tests have been conducted in the U.S,22 which includes an unknown number of tests conducted on people with no symptoms.
The costs for such testing could be used for a more productive purpose, according to Sheftall, particularly for asymptomatic people. “The whole basis of medicine,” he says, is to test people with symptoms so you can find out what’s wrong and treat them accordingly:
“In 2017 to 2018 … between 70 and 80 million people in America got the flu … nobody noticed for the most part and no one was tested. I’m a doctor and I vaguely remember that it was a bad flu season. That was it. And yet with COVID we’re testing so many people you wouldn’t believe it.”23
What’s more, positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests have proven remarkably unreliable with high false result rates, and a positive test does not mean that an active infection is present.
Fear May Be Causing More Deaths
Taken together, what’s clear about the COVID-19 fatality rates being reported is that there’s a lot of room for error and misinterpretation. Solid analysis of any “excess” deaths being attributed to COVID-19 are needed before policy decisions are made. When this was done in England in October 2020, deaths were only 1% higher than expected, and many of them were due to heart disease, stroke and diabetes.
“Notably” fewer deaths due to respiratory conditions and acute respiratory infections were found, yet deaths occurring in homes due to non-COVID-causes increased. This may be another sad outcome of the fear being propagated in relation to COVID-19. According to the study,
“The data suggest that mortality has shifted from hospital to home, especially for deaths not associated with COVID-19. This ‘displacement’ may be due to the reluctance of individuals to receive treatment in hospital or of clinicians to admit non-covid patients … Deaths in the home remain persistently high, and yet they receive little attention.”24
••••
Sources and References:


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-31--The Dangerous Alliance of Rothschilds and the Vatican of Francis [VIDEO]

HOLY Moly !
The most globalist and interventionist Pope since the Crusades of the 12th century has formalised an alliance with the largest figures in global finance led by none other than that noble banking family , Rothschild .
The new alliance is a joint venture they call ‘ Council for Inclusive Capitalism with the Vatican.
’ The venture is one of the more cynical and , given the actors , most dangerous frauds being promoted since Davos WEF guru and Henry Kissinger protégé , Klaus Schwab , began to promote the great reset of the world capitalist order .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Inclusive Capitalism with the Vatican ?
On their website they proclaim in a typical UN doublespeak , ‘ The Council for Inclusive Capitalism is a movement of the world ’ s business and public sector leaders who are working to build a more inclusive , sustainable , and trusted economic system that addresses the needs of our people and the planet.
’ A more sustainable , trusted economic system ?
Doesn ’ t that sound like the infamous UN Agenda 21 and its Agenda 2030 daughter , the globalist master plan ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is fundamentally about creating long-term value for all stakeholders — businesses , investors , employees , customers , governments and communities.
’ They continue , ‘ Council members make actionable commitments aligned with the World Economic Forum International Business Council ’ s pillars for sustainable value creation — people , planet , principles of governance , and prosperity — and that advance the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
’ In announcing the deal with the Vatican , Lynn Forester de Rothschild declared , ‘ This council will follow the warning from Pope Francis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the earth and the cry of the poor ” and answer society ’ s demands for a more equitable and sustainable model of growth.
’ Their reference to Klaus Schwab ’ s World Economic Forum is no accident .
The group is yet another front group in what is becoming a globalist bum ’ s rush to try to convince a sceptical world that the same people who created the post-1945 model of IMF-led globalisation and giga-corporate entities more powerful than governments , destroying traditional agriculture in favour of toxic agribusiness , dismantling @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to cheap labour countries like Mexico or China , will now lead the effort to correct all their abuses ?
We are being naïve if we swallow this .
FIRST off , it is useful to see who are the ‘ inclusive ’ capitalists joining forces with the Pope and Vatican .
The founder is a lady who carries the name Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild .
She is the wife of the 90-year old retired mega-billionaire head of London ’ s NM Rothschilds Bank , Sir Evelyn de Rothschild .
Lady Lynn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ roots , born into a US working class family in New Jersey whose father , as she tells it , worked two jobs to put her and her brothers through law and medical schools .
She seemed to have had some influential mentors , as she went to Wall Street , then to telecoms including Motorola , and made reported tens of millions before hooking up with Sir Evelyn and his reported $ 20 billion in assets .
( ER : Shouldn ’ t this be TRILLIONS given how many centuries the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ influential of positions ? )
Reports have it that Henry Kissinger played a personal role in encouraging the Transatlantic union of the two .
Lady Lynn is interesting as well beyond her famous husband .
According to the list of names of those who flew on the private jet of convicted child sex trafficker and reported Mossad operative Jeffrey Epstein , one name that appears is ‘ de Rothschild , Lynn Forester.
’ It is interesting to note that the same Lynn Forester in 1991 , before she took Sir Evelyn as her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have full use of one of Lynn ’ s Manhattan apartment properties , following the apparent murder of the woman ’ s father , British media tycoon and Mossad agent , Robert Maxwell .
The British friend of Lynn , Ghislaine Maxwell , today is awaiting trial for complicity in child sex trafficking as the partner of Jeffrey Epstein .
Maxwell reportedly maintained the Manhattan address of Lady Lynn until very recently to register a bizarre non-profit called Terramar that she and Epstein set up in 2012 , allegedly aimed at saving our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she quickly dissolved the non-profit .
One of the donors to Ghislaine ’ s TerraMar was something called the Clinton Foundation , which leads to the next friend .
Lady Lynn has another long-time friend named Hillary Clinton , whose husband , Bill , was also logged on Epstein ’ s Lolita Express private jet , around two dozen times .
Lynn and her new husband , Sir Evelyn , in fact were so close to the Clintons that , in 2000 , the Rothschild newlyweds spent part of their honeymoon as guests @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Lady Lynn after that became a major fund-raiser in 2008 and again in 2016 for a possible Hillary bid for president , called a ‘ bundler.
’ She also advised Hillary on her economic programme , a free market one based on Adam Smith as she described it once in an interview .
THE Rothschild venture with the Vatican at this point , in addition to co-founder Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild , includes hand-picked money moguls and their select foundations who pompously call themselves the ‘ guardians.
’ That ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ side Chicago gang or some kind of mafia overlords .
They call themselves the moral guardians , together now with their new friends at the Vatican , for reform of capitalism .
The guardian member list includes Rajiv Shah , the chief executive officer of the Rockefeller Foundation , and former partner of the Gates Foundation ’ s AGRA scam to introduce Genetically Modified Organism seeds in Africa .
The Rockefeller Foundation has been involved in promoting a pandemic ‘ lockdown ’ since 2010 , and is a core part of the WEF @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a Rockefeller report , ‘ Reset the Table : Meeting the Moment to Transform the US Food System ’ .
Rothschild ’ s guardians also include Darren Walker , the chief executive officer of the Ford Foundation .
Those two foundations , Ford and Rockefeller , have done more to shape an imperial American foreign policy than even the US state department or the Central Intelligence Agency , including the funding of the failed Green Revolution in India and Mexico , and the creation by Rockefeller funds of GMO crops .
The head @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chemicals group is another guardian as well as scandal-ridden vaccine and drug companies , Merck and Johnson and Johnson .
Merck lied about the risks of its arthritis drug Vioxx until more than 55,000 users died of heart attacks .
Johnson and Johnson has been involved in numerous frauds in recent years including around negative effects of its anti-psychotic drug Risperdal , illegal presence of cancer-causing asbestos in its baby powder , and potentially thousands of legal actions for its role as a leading supplier of the opioid in Purdue Pharma ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ include CEOs of Visa , Mastercard , Bank of America , Allianz insurance , BP .
In 2016 , Visa along with the United States Agency for International Development was behind the catastrophic Modi experiment to introduce a cashless economy in India .
Notable also is guardian Mark Carney , former Bank of England head and also advocate of cashless digital central bank currencies to replace the dollar .
Carney is now United Nations special envoy for climate action and finance .
Carney is also a board member of the World Economic Forum @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reset of capitalism to impose the dystopian Agenda 2030 ‘ sustainable ’ economy .
In fact several of Rothschild ’ s guardians are on the WEF board , including billionaire Marc Benioff , founder of cloud computing Salesforce , and OECD head Angel Gurria .
And ex-Credit Suisse CEO , Tidjane Thiam is on the International Business Council of the World Economic Forum .
Other guardians of the inclusive capitalism transformation include the head of Bank of America , which bank was sued by the US government for fraud connected with the 2008 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as for laundering money for the deadly Mexican drug cartels and Russian organised crime .
The select guardian list also includes Marcie Frost , the controversial head of CalPERS , the huge fraud-ridden California state pension fund managing over $ 360 billion .
The head of State Street Corporation , one of the world ’ s largest asset management companies with $ 3.1 trillion under management , is another guardian .
In January 2020 State Street announced it would vote against directors of companies in major stock indices that do not meet targets @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This is what is called ‘ green investing ’ , as part of so-called ‘ socially responsible investing ’ .
The WEF strategy , pushed also by WEF board members like Larry Fink of BlackRock , reward companies that they deem ‘ socially responsible.
’ This is the key to the inclusive capitalism agenda of not just Rothschild ’ s inclusive capitalism guardians , but also the WEF .
Their website claims that the guardians manage more than $ 10.5 trillion dollars and control companies that employ 200 million workers .
Now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ partner .
IRONICALLY , or maybe not , Pope Francis , the partner chosen to give Rothschild ’ s group of mega-capitalists ‘ moral ’ credibility , is himself embroiled in what could be the largest financial scandals , fraud and misuse of church funds in the modern history of the Vatican .
This despite the fact Pope Francis declared as new Pope in 2013 that one of his main tasks would be to clean up the scandal-ridden Vatican finances .
That has hardly taken place even after more than six years .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ corruption has worsened .
The unravelling scandal revolves around now-disgraced Cardinal Angelo Becciu , who until 2018 was de facto chief of staff to the Pope and regular confidante .
Becciu was Substitute for General Affairs in the Secretariat of State , a key position in the Roman Curia until June 2018 when the Pope elevated him to Cardinal , ironically enough , responsible for the Congregation for the Causes of Saints .
Becciu , clearly no saint , was able to invest hundreds of millions , even billions , over years of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ poor in Peter ’ s Pence , into projects he chose with a former banker from Credit Suisse .
Projects included a 150 million euro share in a luxury London real estate complex and $ 1.1 million into a film , Rocketman , about the life of Elton John .
That comes to light as the ongoing Vatican child sex scandals caused Pope Francis to defrock Cardinal Theodore McCarrick of Washington , the first Cardinal to fall in the church ’ s deep sexual abuse charges .
Italian press reports that the Pope @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and even praised them before the depth of the scandals broke .
In November 2020 , Italian police raided the residence of Becciu ’ s former Vatican accountant and found 600,000 euros in cash and evidence the Vatican employee received $ 15 million in fake invoicing over years .
With a background like this , the new Council for Inclusive Capitalism with the Vatican of Lynn de Rothschild warrants close scrutiny as they clearly plan big things along with Klaus Schwab ’ s World Economic Forum to ‘ reform ’ the world economy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nice or moral we can be sure .

HOLY Moly! The most globalist and interventionist Pope since the Crusades of the 12th century has formalised an alliance with the largest figures in global finance led by none other than that noble banking family, Rothschild.
The new alliance is a joint venture they call ‘Council for Inclusive Capitalism with the Vatican.’ The venture is one of the more cynical and, given the actors, most dangerous frauds being promoted since Davos WEF guru and Henry Kissinger protégé, Klaus Schwab, began to promote the great reset of the world capitalist order. What and is behind this so-called Council for Inclusive Capitalism with the Vatican?
On their website they proclaim in a typical UN doublespeak, ‘The Council for Inclusive Capitalism is a movement of the world’s business and public sector leaders who are working to build a more inclusive, sustainable, and trusted economic system that addresses the needs of our people and the planet.’ A more sustainable, trusted economic system? Doesn’t that sound like the infamous UN Agenda 21 and its Agenda 2030 daughter, the globalist master plan? They then claim, ‘Inclusive capitalism is fundamentally about creating long-term value for all stakeholders — businesses, investors, employees, customers, governments and communities.’
They continue, ‘Council members make actionable commitments aligned with the World Economic Forum International Business Council’s pillars for sustainable value creation — people, planet, principles of governance, and prosperity — and that advance the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.’
In announcing the deal with the Vatican, Lynn Forester de Rothschild declared, ‘This council will follow the warning from Pope Francis to listen to “the cry of the earth and the cry of the poor” and answer society’s demands for a more equitable and sustainable model of growth.’
Their reference to Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum is no accident. The group is yet another front group in what is becoming a globalist bum’s rush to try to convince a sceptical world that the same people who created the post-1945 model of IMF-led globalisation and giga-corporate entities more powerful than governments, destroying traditional agriculture in favour of toxic agribusiness, dismantling living standards in industrialised countries to flee to cheap labour countries like Mexico or China, will now lead the effort to correct all their abuses?
We are being naïve if we swallow this.
Rothschild and pals
FIRST off, it is useful to see who are the ‘inclusive’ capitalists joining forces with the Pope and Vatican. The founder is a lady who carries the name Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild. She is the wife of the 90-year old retired mega-billionaire head of London’s NM Rothschilds Bank, Sir Evelyn de Rothschild. Lady Lynn, however, is from ‘commoner’ roots, born into a US working class family in New Jersey whose father, as she tells it, worked two jobs to put her and her brothers through law and medical schools. She seemed to have had some influential mentors, as she went to Wall Street, then to telecoms including Motorola, and made reported tens of millions before hooking up with Sir Evelyn and his reported $20 billion in assets. (ER: Shouldn’t this be TRILLIONS given how many centuries the Rothschilds have been around in the most influential of positions?) Reports have it that Henry Kissinger played a personal role in encouraging the Transatlantic union of the two.
Lady Lynn is interesting as well beyond her famous husband. According to the list of names of those who flew on the private jet of convicted child sex trafficker and reported Mossad operative Jeffrey Epstein, one name that appears is ‘de Rothschild, Lynn Forester.’
It is interesting to note that the same Lynn Forester in 1991, before she took Sir Evelyn as her husband, generously let a British friend have full use of one of Lynn’s Manhattan apartment properties, following the apparent murder of the woman’s father, British media tycoon and Mossad agent, Robert Maxwell. The British friend of Lynn, Ghislaine Maxwell, today is awaiting trial for complicity in child sex trafficking as the partner of Jeffrey Epstein. Maxwell reportedly maintained the Manhattan address of Lady Lynn until very recently to register a bizarre non-profit called Terramar that she and Epstein set up in 2012, allegedly aimed at saving our oceans. When Epstein was arrested, she quickly dissolved the non-profit. One of the donors to Ghislaine’s TerraMar was something called the Clinton Foundation, which leads to the next friend.
Lady Lynn has another long-time friend named Hillary Clinton, whose husband, Bill, was also logged on Epstein’s Lolita Express private jet, around two dozen times. Lynn and her new husband, Sir Evelyn, in fact were so close to the Clintons that, in 2000, the Rothschild newlyweds spent part of their honeymoon as guests at the White House of the Clintons. Lady Lynn after that became a major fund-raiser in 2008 and again in 2016 for a possible Hillary bid for president, called a ‘bundler.’ She also advised Hillary on her economic programme, a free market one based on Adam Smith as she described it once in an interview.
Lady Lynn’s ‘guardians’
THE Rothschild venture with the Vatican at this point, in addition to co-founder Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild, includes hand-picked money moguls and their select foundations who pompously call themselves the ‘guardians.’ That’s a term sounding more like a south side Chicago gang or some kind of mafia overlords. They call themselves the moral guardians, together now with their new friends at the Vatican, for reform of capitalism.
The guardian member list includes Rajiv Shah, the chief executive officer of the Rockefeller Foundation, and former partner of the Gates Foundation’s AGRA scam to introduce Genetically Modified Organism seeds in Africa. The Rockefeller Foundation has been involved in promoting a pandemic ‘lockdown’ since 2010, and is a core part of the WEF great reset agenda. He just released a Rockefeller report, ‘Reset the Table: Meeting the Moment to Transform the US Food System’.
Rothschild’s guardians also include Darren Walker, the chief executive officer of the Ford Foundation. Those two foundations, Ford and Rockefeller, have done more to shape an imperial American foreign policy than even the US state department or the Central Intelligence Agency, including the funding of the failed Green Revolution in India and Mexico, and the creation by Rockefeller funds of GMO crops.
The head of DuPont, a GMO giant and chemicals group is another guardian as well as scandal-ridden vaccine and drug companies, Merck and Johnson and Johnson. Merck lied about the risks of its arthritis drug Vioxx until more than 55,000 users died of heart attacks. Johnson and Johnson has been involved in numerous frauds in recent years including around negative effects of its anti-psychotic drug Risperdal, illegal presence of cancer-causing asbestos in its baby powder, and potentially thousands of legal actions for its role as a leading supplier of the opioid in Purdue Pharma’s deadly prescription painkiller OxyContin.
Other guardians include CEOs of Visa, Mastercard, Bank of America, Allianz insurance, BP. In 2016, Visa along with the United States Agency for International Development was behind the catastrophic Modi experiment to introduce a cashless economy in India.
Notable also is guardian Mark Carney, former Bank of England head and also advocate of cashless digital central bank currencies to replace the dollar. Carney is now United Nations special envoy for climate action and finance.
Carney is also a board member of the World Economic Forum, the public promoter of the global reset of capitalism to impose the dystopian Agenda 2030 ‘sustainable’ economy. In fact several of Rothschild’s guardians are on the WEF board, including billionaire Marc Benioff, founder of cloud computing Salesforce, and OECD head Angel Gurria. And ex-Credit Suisse CEO, Tidjane Thiam is on the International Business Council of the World Economic Forum.
Other guardians of the inclusive capitalism transformation include the head of Bank of America, which bank was sued by the US government for fraud connected with the 2008 US subprime mortgage crisis, as well as for laundering money for the deadly Mexican drug cartels and Russian organised crime. The select guardian list also includes Marcie Frost, the controversial head of CalPERS, the huge fraud-ridden California state pension fund managing over $360 billion.
The head of State Street Corporation, one of the world’s largest asset management companies with $3.1 trillion under management, is another guardian. In January 2020 State Street announced it would vote against directors of companies in major stock indices that do not meet targets for environmental, social and governance changes. This is what is called ‘green investing’, as part of so-called ‘socially responsible investing’. The WEF strategy, pushed also by WEF board members like Larry Fink of BlackRock, reward companies that they deem ‘socially responsible.’ This is the key to the inclusive capitalism agenda of not just Rothschild’s inclusive capitalism guardians, but also the WEF.
Their website claims that the guardians manage more than $10.5 trillion dollars and control companies that employ 200 million workers. Now a brief look at their new Vatican partner.
Vatican morals?
IRONICALLY, or maybe not, Pope Francis, the partner chosen to give Rothschild’s group of mega-capitalists ‘moral’ credibility, is himself embroiled in what could be the largest financial scandals, fraud and misuse of church funds in the modern history of the Vatican. This despite the fact Pope Francis declared as new Pope in 2013 that one of his main tasks would be to clean up the scandal-ridden Vatican finances. That has hardly taken place even after more than six years. Some Vatican observers even claim the financial corruption has worsened.
The unravelling scandal revolves around now-disgraced Cardinal Angelo Becciu, who until 2018 was de facto chief of staff to the Pope and regular confidante. Becciu was Substitute for General Affairs in the Secretariat of State, a key position in the Roman Curia until June 2018 when the Pope elevated him to Cardinal, ironically enough, responsible for the Congregation for the Causes of Saints. Becciu, clearly no saint, was able to invest hundreds of millions, even billions, over years of church funds, including donations for the poor in Peter’s Pence, into projects he chose with a former banker from Credit Suisse. Projects included a 150 million euro share in a luxury London real estate complex and $1.1 million into a film, Rocketman, about the life of Elton John. That comes to light as the ongoing Vatican child sex scandals caused Pope Francis to defrock Cardinal Theodore McCarrick of Washington, the first Cardinal to fall in the church’s deep sexual abuse charges.
Italian press reports that the Pope knew about the dubious investments of Becciu and even praised them before the depth of the scandals broke. In November 2020, Italian police raided the residence of Becciu’s former Vatican accountant and found 600,000 euros in cash and evidence the Vatican employee received $15 million in fake invoicing over years.
With a background like this, the new Council for Inclusive Capitalism with the Vatican of Lynn de Rothschild warrants close scrutiny as they clearly plan big things along with Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum to ‘reform’ the world economy, and it won’t be nice or moral we can be sure.
********
VIDEO by Dr. MARSHALL TAYLOR


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-31--When your brain wash is on the spin cycle . . .

Here is another article from Russia Today .
It is somewhat irksome that we have to defer to Russian news sources for a rational and balanced view of things but such is the poor trustworthiness of British media we sometimes we need to .
Several important things emerge from this article and let ’ s summarise them here : • It is not unusual for viruses to mutate .
The COVID19 virus has already done it a couple of times .
• The normal pattern for viruses is that they mutate but the mutation is less severe than its predecessor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ virus that mutates every year .
When it mutates the vaccine that was developed for its predecessor does not work on the mutation so a new vaccine has to be developed and then a year later another vaccine has to be developed for the next strain .
• It seems likely that the Covid virus will follow the same pattern and there is every possibility – if it has not happened already – that the vaccines developed already and which have an as yet uncertain workability and safety will not work on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up in the position of having to develop a new vaccine every year and if the government vaccinates the entire population , everyone will receive a new vaccine every year .
The health impact of a new vaccine being injected into you every year , year in and year out is unknown but likely to be considerable .
No research has been done into the safety of multiple vaccines and what would be a safe number ( one ?
ten ?
twelve ?
thirty ? )
.
Bear in mind also that if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ covid then logically one should also vax annually against flu which presents similar dangers and is in fact more dangerous to young age groups .
A far better , cheaper and safer approach would be to • Pour coals on boosting the citizenry ’ s immune system with vits C , D , A and the mineral zinc so that the immune system is in better shape to defend the body .
There is after all a known correlation between vitamin D deficiency and susceptibility to infection .
There are of course other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as drugs ( medicinal , psych , street ) , alcohol , heavy smoking and so forth that could be explored .
• Pour coals on the development of known cures such as hydroxychloroquine for those who do get a bad case of the bug .
Hydroxy , so far as is known , will work on any mutation of the bug and indeed upon flu as well so far as I ’ m aware .
For those who want to take the risk ( and they look at the moment to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trialed vaccines whose short medium and long term adverse reactions are not known , they should do so .
The risk is theirs to take provided they are accurately informed as to the relative dangers of the bug versus the vaccine but they should bear in mind that the bug ’ s routine mutations may necessitate them being injected with a new vaccine every year .
Here is the article [ SOURCE ] Contagious and mutated : What we know about the NEW coronavirus strain – and how much you need to worry @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Covid-19 coronavirus has spread to more countries around the globe .
But what ’ s different about this new pathogen ?
And should people be prepping for a total apocalypse yet ?
Ireland confirmed the presence of a new and highly infectious coronavirus strain on Friday , while authorities in Lebanon and Japan also recorded the first cases attributed to this variant .
In continental Europe , Germany and Denmark confirmed the presence of the strain earlier this week , joining the Netherlands and Italy .
Little is yet known about the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ name ‘ SARS-CoV-2 VOC 202012/01.
’ But while it certainly poses a problem , it does not appear as apocalyptic as some media have been presenting it .
Where did it come from ?
The new strain is believed to have originated in the UK , and was first detected there in September .
It spread rapidly , and testing data from UK laboratories show that in certain areas , it now accounts for more than two thirds of all cases of Covid-19 .
The rapid spread of the new strain prompted British @ @ @ @ @ @ @ restrictions on large swathes of the country , effectively cancelling Christmas for millions of Londoners and others in the southeast .
More than 50 countries have banned travel to and from the UK , but with virologists predicting an upsurge of discoveries in new countries in the coming days , the EU has called on its members to lift their restrictions on UK travel .
What ’ s new about it ?
The main factor setting the new strain apart from its predecessor is its infectiousness .
Although pinning down exactly how much @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has repeatedly claimed the strain is 70 percent more infectious than the existing strain , apparently quoting physicians from Imperial College London and the government ’ s own New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group ( NERVTAG ) .
With the government floating such ominous figures , the media went into overdrive .
The Sun described the new strain as a “ nightmare before Christmas , ” while Metro called it “ Mutant Covid.
” Even the more restrained Financial Times said that scientists are “ alarmed ” at the spread of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the evidence for increased transmissibility is still scant , and some dissenting doctors reckon there ’ s no proof of the new strain spreading faster at all .
“ We have not seen any evidence to back that claim up , ” Professor of microbiology Hugh Pennington told the Scottish Sun this week .
Others , including German virologist Christian Drosten , have said there is still not enough data to conclude whether the new strain is indeed more transmissible .
ALSO ON RT.COMTop German virologist casts doubt on fears of new ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claims about the new strain have also emerged , for instance that it transmits easier between children .
Professor Neil Ferguson of NERVTAG made this claim earlier this week , but added that “ more research would need to be done on the matter before any conclusions should be drawn.
” What threat does it pose ?
On the surface , the idea of a mutated virus may spark alarm .
However , the coronavirus variant prevalent before this new strain was itself a mutation of the original pathogen that emerged in Wuhan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Upon reaching Europe in February the virus mutated into a strain known as ‘ D614G , ’ which then became the dominant strain worldwide .
Another strain , A222V , broke out in Spain shortly afterwards and now accounts for up to seven percent of samples in Europe .
When ‘ D614G ’ emerged , scientists warned that it could be nine times as contagious as the Wuhan strain .
Thankfully , this warning has never been proven to be the case .
All viruses mutate , usually becoming milder as they do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ryan told a virtual briefing this week that such mutations are “ a normal part of virus evolution.
” At present there is no evidence that the new variant is any more deadly than the existing one .
The UK , for example , reported just over 39,000 new cases of Covid-19 on Thursday , more than five times as many as on the worst day of the first wave in April .
However , 574 deaths were recorded , around half as many as on several days in April .
Will vaccines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the consensus says yes .
However , if the virus continues to mutate , there is a danger that it will learn how to evade the three vaccines currently available in the west .
The influenza virus mutates so regularly that new flu vaccines are released every year to counter the virus ’ latest adaptations .
So far , the coronavirus has not mutated rapidly enough to cause concerns about vaccine efficacy .
Drugmakers Pfizer and Moderna are currently testing their vaccines against the new strain , while German firm BioNTech , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , said this week that a new formula could be whipped up in six weeks if necessary .
However , the virus could theoretically continue to mutate and stay one step ahead of vaccine developers .
“ This virus is potentially on a pathway for vaccine escape , it has taken the first couple of steps towards that , ” Cambridge University professor Ravi Gupta told the BBC .
“ If we let it add more mutations , then you start worrying.
” Even with the threat of further mutations , though , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ experimental cocktail of antibodies that they say could stop anyone exposed to the coronavirus from going on to develop Covid-19 .
Developed by University College London Hospitals and British-Swedish drug firm AstraZeneca , the treatment promises to confer instant immunity on anyone exposed to the pathogen .
Vaccines , on the other hand , can take up to a month to confer full immunity .
There are thousands of Covid strains , so this new scare is NOT a big deal , but politicians just love their new authoritarianism Good news for vaccines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ eight months , Australian researchers say The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

Introduction by Caratacus
Here is another article from Russia Today.
It is somewhat irksome that we have to defer to Russian news sources for a rational and balanced view of things but such is the poor trustworthiness of British media we sometimes we need to.
Several important things emerge from this article and let’s summarise them here:
It is not unusual for viruses to mutate. The COVID19 virus has already done it a couple of times.
The normal pattern for viruses is that they mutate but the mutation is less severe than its predecessor.
The influenza virus is a virus that mutates every year. When it mutates the vaccine that was developed for its predecessor does not work on the mutation so a new vaccine has to be developed and then a year later another vaccine has to be developed for the next strain.
It seems likely that the Covid virus will follow the same pattern and there is every possibility – if it has not happened already – that the vaccines developed already and which have an as yet uncertain workability and safety will not work on the new strains.
We could therefore wind up in the position of having to develop a new vaccine every year and if the government vaccinates the entire population, everyone will receive a new vaccine every year. The health impact of a new vaccine being injected into you every year, year in and year out is unknown but likely to be considerable. No research has been done into the safety of multiple vaccines and what would be a safe number (one? ten? twelve? thirty?).
Bear in mind also that if one is going to vax annually against covid then logically one should also vax annually against flu which presents similar dangers and is in fact more dangerous to young age groups.
A far better, cheaper and safer approach would be to
Pour coals on boosting the citizenry’s immune system with vits C, D, A and the mineral zinc so that the immune system is in better shape to defend the body. There is after all a known correlation between vitamin D deficiency and susceptibility to infection. There are of course other factors that weaken the immune system such as drugs (medicinal, psych, street), alcohol, heavy smoking and so forth that could be explored.
Pour coals on the development of known cures such as hydroxychloroquine for those who do get a bad case of the bug. Hydroxy, so far as is known, will work on any mutation of the bug and indeed upon flu as well so far as I’m aware.
For those who want to take the risk (and they look at the moment to be considerable) with the rushed and inadequately trialed vaccines whose short medium and long term adverse reactions are not known, they should do so. The risk is theirs to take provided they are accurately informed as to the relative dangers of the bug versus the vaccine but they should bear in mind that the bug’s routine mutations may necessitate them being injected with a new vaccine every year.
Here is the article [SOURCE]
Contagious and mutated: What we know about the NEW coronavirus strain – and how much you need to worry
A new and more infectious strain of the Covid-19 coronavirus has spread to more countries around the globe. But what’s different about this new pathogen? And should people be prepping for a total apocalypse yet?
Ireland confirmed the presence of a new and highly infectious coronavirus strain on Friday, while authorities in Lebanon and Japan also recorded the first cases attributed to this variant. In continental Europe, Germany and Denmark confirmed the presence of the strain earlier this week, joining the Netherlands and Italy. Little is yet known about the new strain – which bears the catchy name ‘SARS-CoV-2 VOC 202012/01.’ But while it certainly poses a problem, it does not appear as apocalyptic as some media have been presenting it. Where did it come from? The new strain is believed to have originated in the UK, and was first detected there in September. It spread rapidly, and testing data from UK laboratories show that in certain areas, it now accounts for more than two thirds of all cases of Covid-19. The rapid spread of the new strain prompted British Prime Minister Boris Johnson to reimpose harsh restrictions on large swathes of the country, effectively cancelling Christmas for millions of Londoners and others in the southeast. More than 50 countries have banned travel to and from the UK, but with virologists predicting an upsurge of discoveries in new countries in the coming days, the EU has called on its members to lift their restrictions on UK travel. What’s new about it? The main factor setting the new strain apart from its predecessor is its infectiousness. Although pinning down exactly how much more transmissible is difficult, PM Johnson has repeatedly claimed the strain is 70 percent more infectious than the existing strain, apparently quoting physicians from Imperial College London and the government’s own New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group (NERVTAG). With the government floating such ominous figures, the media went into overdrive. The Sun described the new strain as a “nightmare before Christmas,” while Metro called it “Mutant Covid.” Even the more restrained Financial Times said that scientists are “alarmed” at the spread of the “Covid mutant.” However, the evidence for increased transmissibility is still scant, and some dissenting doctors reckon there’s no proof of the new strain spreading faster at all. “We have not seen any evidence to back that claim up,” Professor of microbiology Hugh Pennington told the Scottish Sun this week. Others, including German virologist Christian Drosten, have said there is still not enough data to conclude whether the new strain is indeed more transmissible. ALSO ON RT.COMTop German virologist casts doubt on fears of new ‘highly contagious’ UK Covid-19 strainSome specific claims about the new strain have also emerged, for instance that it transmits easier between children. Professor Neil Ferguson of NERVTAG made this claim earlier this week, but added that “more research would need to be done on the matter before any conclusions should be drawn.” What threat does it pose? On the surface, the idea of a mutated virus may spark alarm. However, the coronavirus variant prevalent before this new strain was itself a mutation of the original pathogen that emerged in Wuhan, China, a year ago. Upon reaching Europe in February the virus mutated into a strain known as ‘D614G,’ which then became the dominant strain worldwide. Another strain, A222V, broke out in Spain shortly afterwards and now accounts for up to seven percent of samples in Europe. When ‘D614G’ emerged, scientists warned that it could be nine times as contagious as the Wuhan strain. Thankfully, this warning has never been proven to be the case. All viruses mutate, usually becoming milder as they do. World Health Organization emergencies chief Mike Ryan told a virtual briefing this week that such mutations are “a normal part of virus evolution.” At present there is no evidence that the new variant is any more deadly than the existing one. The UK, for example, reported just over 39,000 new cases of Covid-19 on Thursday, more than five times as many as on the worst day of the first wave in April. However, 574 deaths were recorded, around half as many as on several days in April. Will vaccines protect against it? At the moment, the consensus says yes. However, if the virus continues to mutate, there is a danger that it will learn how to evade the three vaccines currently available in the west. The influenza virus mutates so regularly that new flu vaccines are released every year to counter the virus’ latest adaptations. So far, the coronavirus has not mutated rapidly enough to cause concerns about vaccine efficacy. Drugmakers Pfizer and Moderna are currently testing their vaccines against the new strain, while German firm BioNTech, which developed a vaccine along with Pfizer, said this week that a new formula could be whipped up in six weeks if necessary. However, the virus could theoretically continue to mutate and stay one step ahead of vaccine developers. “This virus is potentially on a pathway for vaccine escape, it has taken the first couple of steps towards that,” Cambridge University professor Ravi Gupta told the BBC. “If we let it add more mutations, then you start worrying.” Even with the threat of further mutations, though, scientists in the UK are trialling an experimental cocktail of antibodies that they say could stop anyone exposed to the coronavirus from going on to develop Covid-19. Developed by University College London Hospitals and British-Swedish drug firm AstraZeneca, the treatment promises to confer instant immunity on anyone exposed to the pathogen. Vaccines, on the other hand, can take up to a month to confer full immunity. ALSO ON RT.COM There are thousands of Covid strains, so this new scare is NOT a big deal, but politicians just love their new authoritarianism Good news for vaccines? Covid-19 immunity lasts for at least eight months, Australian researchers say First featured on UK Reloaded
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-31--Swiss & Israeli Patients Die Shortly After Receiving Pfizer COVID Vaccine

A multi-sick man at the age of 85 has died in Kalmar .
The man died the day after he was vaccinated with the Pfizer / Biontech vaccine .
A 85-year-old man has died the day after he was vaccinated with the Pfizer / Biontech vaccine .
The man was multi-sick and lived in a special accommodation in the Kalmar Region .
He died of a suspected cardiac arrest but the cause of death has not yet been determined , the Medical Products Agency informs TT .
- We can not really say anything at the moment about a possible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cause of death , says Veronica Arthurson , unit manager for drug safety at the Medical Products Agency .
The incident will now be investigated .
She points out that there is nothing in the large clinical studies done on the vaccine that suggests that it causes side effects related to heart disease .
Following a handful of reports , including one involving a priest from the Philadelphia area who volunteered as a trial participant ( ER : Father John Fields ) , about patients who received a vaccine dying in the weeks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Israel has died 2 hours after receiving the vaccine .
According to reports in the Israeli press , a 75 year old man from Beit Shean died Monday morning from a heart attack about 2 hours after receiving the vaccine .
The Israeli Health Ministry released a statement on the death : “ A 75-year-old man from the north of the country suffering from active heart disease and malignant disease , who has undergone a number of heart attacks , was vaccinated this morning against the coronavirus and died at home shortly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ man ’ s death follows reports that 5K out of the first 215K recipients of the vaccine in the US reported some kind of “ adverse health impact event ” , which could be anything that seriously limits an individual ’ s ability to function and/or complete daily tasks .
These events should be severe enough to require medical attention , but exact details are unclear .
What on earth was such a sick man doing , receiving a risky , experimental vaccine ?
But it gets worse … This short report from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which the Zerohedge piece below reports on .
See Vaccinated on Christmas Eve , dead five days later .
Note in this story that the first vaccine recipients in Switzerland are the elderly and dementia patients , i.e .
seriously fragile people who would never be considered suitable trial subjects for an experimental vaccine .
But this is effectively what they are : The first serious incident occurred in the canton ( ER : of Lucerne ) whose health director Guido Graf ( CVP ) wanted to be the first to start @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , vaccinations started on dementia patients .
The canton Lucerne was thus the site of the first vaccinations in Switzerland which was launched last week , with injections given primarily to elderly people .
Switzerland has received 107 000 vaccine doses and expects some additional 250 000 per month starting next year .
On December 26 , the resident complained of urethral and abdominal pain .
He kept getting restless , his blood pressure dropped and his pulse increased .
The doctor in charge examined the vaccine recipient one last time on Sunday @ @ @ @ @ @ @ calm , but his stomach was painful under pressure .
On Monday , the nursing home did not report on the patient ’ s condition .
On Tuesday morning the doctor was informed by email about his patient ’ s worsening general condition .
The patient had already died when the doctor was eventually called .
The patient , apart from having dementia , had been considered healthy before the shot .
( ER : How can a person be considered ‘ healthy ’ when , by definition – with dementia , they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dementia patient give informed consent ? )
According to a New York Post report , this man had ALSO received a flu shot and had reacted badly to it : ‘ The resident , who received the coronavirus vaccine on Christmas Eve , had previously reacted negatively to the flu shot , according to the report.
’ In what universe … ?
Every MSM story we read about these deaths are always quick to add that it wasn ’ t caused by the vaccine .
Which they obviously CAN NOT be certain of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just 2 hours after receiving his first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine , authorities in the Swiss Canton of Lucerne said on Wednesday that one of the first people in the country to receive the vaccine has died , though whether his death had anything to do with the inoculation hasn ’ t yet been determined .
The canton has yet to release any additional details about the exact amount of time that passed between the inoculation and the man ’ s death .
Lucerne was the site of the first vaccinations in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shot from Pfizer and its German partner BioNTech given primarily to elderly people .
Switzerland has received 107K vaccine doses , so far , and expects to get 250K per month starting next year .
“ We are aware of the case , ” a spokesperson said , before adding that the death had been referred to Swiss drugs regulator Swissmedic .
Swissmedic didn ’ t comment further .
Pfizer and BioNTech ’ s vaccine is the only vaccine approved , so far , in Switzerland .
The EU has just started approving @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the first injections starting earlier this week .
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

ER Editor: UPDATE – another very sick Israeli man of 88 years has also died. See 88-year-old collapses and dies several hours after being vaccinated. And an elderly Swedish man with multiple health problems has also died. We ran the first few paragraphs of this Swedish report through a translate function:
A multi-sick man at the age of 85 has died in Kalmar. The man died the day after he was vaccinated with the Pfizer / Biontech vaccine. A 85-year-old man has died the day after he was vaccinated with the Pfizer / Biontech vaccine. The man was multi-sick and lived in a special accommodation in the Kalmar Region. He died of a suspected cardiac arrest but the cause of death has not yet been determined, the Medical Products Agency informs TT. - We can not really say anything at the moment about a possible causal link because there is no established cause of death, says Veronica Arthurson, unit manager for drug safety at the Medical Products Agency. The incident will now be investigated. She points out that there is nothing in the large clinical studies done on the vaccine that suggests that it causes side effects related to heart disease.
***
It is linked to below, but we also recommend this Zerohedge report from 2 days ago titled Israeli Man Dies After Receiving COVID Vaccine As 5K+ “Health Impact Events” Reported In US. The article linked to below from Israel National News says that it was the Pfizer mRNA vaccine. Of note:
Following a handful of reports, including one involving a priest from the Philadelphia area who volunteered as a trial participant (ER: Father John Fields), about patients who received a vaccine dying in the weeks following the second dose, one man in Israel has died 2 hours after receiving the vaccine. According to reports in the Israeli press, a 75 year old man from Beit Shean died Monday morning from a heart attack about 2 hours after receiving the vaccine. … The Israeli Health Ministry released a statement on the death: “A 75-year-old man from the north of the country suffering from active heart disease and malignant disease, who has undergone a number of heart attacks, was vaccinated this morning against the coronavirus and died at home shortly after the procedure.” … News of the man’s death follows reports that 5K out of the first 215K recipients of the vaccine in the US reported some kind of “adverse health impact event”, which could be anything that seriously limits an individual’s ability to function and/or complete daily tasks. These events should be severe enough to require medical attention, but exact details are unclear.
What on earth was such a sick man doing, receiving a risky, experimental vaccine?
But it gets worse …
This short report from FreeWestMedia deals with the story from Switzerland, which the Zerohedge piece below reports on. See Vaccinated on Christmas Eve, dead five days later. Note in this story that the first vaccine recipients in Switzerland are the elderly and dementia patients, i.e. seriously fragile people who would never be considered suitable trial subjects for an experimental vaccine. But this is effectively what they are:
The first serious incident occurred in the canton (ER: of Lucerne) whose health director Guido Graf (CVP) wanted to be the first to start the Corona vaccinations. On Christmas Eve, vaccinations started on dementia patients. The canton Lucerne was thus the site of the first vaccinations in Switzerland which was launched last week, with injections given primarily to elderly people. Switzerland has received 107 000 vaccine doses and expects some additional 250 000 per month starting next year. On December 26, the resident complained of urethral and abdominal pain. He kept getting restless, his blood pressure dropped and his pulse increased. The doctor in charge examined the vaccine recipient one last time on Sunday evening, December 27. He was calm, but his stomach was painful under pressure. On Monday, the nursing home did not report on the patient’s condition. On Tuesday morning the doctor was informed by email about his patient’s worsening general condition. The patient had already died when the doctor was eventually called. The patient, apart from having dementia, had been considered healthy before the shot. (ER: How can a person be considered ‘healthy’ when, by definition – with dementia, they are NOT. And how could a dementia patient give informed consent?)
According to a New York Post report, this man had ALSO received a flu shot and had reacted badly to it: ‘The resident, who received the coronavirus vaccine on Christmas Eve, had previously reacted negatively to the flu shot, according to the report.’ In what universe … ?
Every MSM story we read about these deaths are always quick to add that it wasn’t caused by the vaccine. Which they obviously CANNOT be certain of.
******** Swiss Patient Dies Shortly After Receiving Pfizer COVID Vaccine
After an Israeli man reportedly died just 2 hours after receiving his first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, authorities in the Swiss Canton of Lucerne said on Wednesday that one of the first people in the country to receive the vaccine has died, though whether his death had anything to do with the inoculation hasn’t yet been determined. The canton has yet to release any additional details about the exact amount of time that passed between the inoculation and the man’s death. Lucerne was the site of the first vaccinations in Switzerland beginning last week, with a shot from Pfizer and its German partner BioNTech given primarily to elderly people. Switzerland has received 107K vaccine doses, so far, and expects to get 250K per month starting next year. “We are aware of the case,” a spokesperson said, before adding that the death had been referred to Swiss drugs regulator Swissmedic. Swissmedic didn’t comment further. Pfizer and BioNTech’s vaccine is the only vaccine approved, so far, in Switzerland. The EU has just started approving the jabs on an emergency-use basis, with the first injections starting earlier this week. ************ Source
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.