thelibertybeacon--2020-12-06--The U.S. Election Isn’t Over

The U.S. Election Isn’t Over

The U.S. Election Is Not Over President Putin is correct not to congratulate Joe Biden on being elected .
There are two reasons .
The first is that the complex U.S. election process has not finished ; therefore , as Trump has not conceded , there is no “ President-elect ” .
The second reason is that the results may be overthrown by reason of fraud .
In which case , Putin will , at the end of the story , look smarter than those who rushed to congratulate Biden before the process was complete .
The hearing in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Georgia and Michigan in the last week of November were the first public appearance of the fraud arguments and their supporting evidence – although the alternate media had been on the case from the beginning .
Contrary to the utterances of the news media , it was only then that the case was presented in its fullest – the previous legal actions having been only preliminary manoeuvring .
The evidence for fraud falls under four heads : eyewitness accounts , improbabilities , statistical analysis and the matter of voting machines and their software @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up numbers – there are relationships and patterns the fraudster may not know about : better to just make up a final percentage à la the USSR .
This piece gives a summary of some of the difficulties with the published results ; this piece describes some of the “ statistical aberrations ” .
Parenthetically , one might observe that the U.S. government declares foreign elections to be fraudulent on a mere fraction of this evidence .
Or even , as in the case of Belarus , with no proffered evidence at all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ films ; nothing at all .
There are now hundreds , if not thousands , of eyewitness accounts of strange happenings – sudden arrivals of ballots , observers kept away , counting stopped but apparently continuing in secret , suspiciously pristine postal ballots , stacks of ballots with only Biden ’ s name filled out , Trump votes destroyed , suspicious ballot “ curing ” , signature problems , backdating postal ballots , wandering USB drives , dead people voting , computer “ glitches ” sending Trump votes to Biden .
Many of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lawsuits and may be read and judged by the public .
Many eyewitness accounts , of course , can be dismissed for one valid reason or another , but there are too many now , with more appearing , for casual dismissal .
There are improbabilities in the result .
Biden received fewer votes than Clinton or Obama in most areas but many more in the “ battleground states ” .
There were striking exceptions in “ down-ballot ” voting : in the key states there were large differences between the votes for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
There are cases of historically high – almost Soviet-level – turnouts in key precincts in the “ battleground states ” .
There were improbably high turnouts in nursing homes and in group homes .
There are many cases where more votes were cast than voters registered .
It was generally a bad day for Democratic candidates : seats were lost in the House and in state legislatures but we are expected to believe that Biden won a strong victory .
Despite the spectacular difference in enthusiastic crowds , we ’ re told @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the day .
Perhaps any one of these can be explained but can all of them ?
Statistical analysis comprises the next grouping of evidence .
We see that votes for Biden , most of the time , and votes for Trump , all of the time , roughly accord with the curve of Benford ’ s Law .
But in those areas where Biden needed the votes , they do not .
Violations of Benford ’ s Law are commonly used by forensic accountants to indicate fraud .
An analysis of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ratio of votes for Biden with a sudden jump in the hours when counting was “ stopped ” .
In some cases votes seem to have been processed faster than physically possible .
Other analyses point to suspicious spikes of votes for Biden .
A number of statisticians have been attracted to the question and their analyses suggesting fraud are appearing .
Again there are too many of these pointers – all of them in the same direction – to be easily dismissed .
Finally there is the whole collection of problems with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and their associated software .
The argument is that the machines and software were specifically designed to produce fraudulent results : totals can be changed , votes switched from one candidate to another , incoming vote weighted in favour of one candidate and so on .
There are affidavits to this effect .
U.S. Embassy cables and previous investigations had shown problems with Dominion machines but , nonetheless , they and the associated software were widely used in 2020 .
There is possible foreign involvement in these important machines : many parts are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voting tallies were sent to other countries on the Internet and were massaged there and that passwords into the system were widely available .
A computer security expert attests that “ hundreds of thousands of votes ” were transferred from Trump to Biden by the machines .
These issues are attracting computer programmers and hackers and there are now a number of videos on the Internet showing how easily the machines can be hacked .
In summary , the argument is that the machines were programmed to rig the vote in the key @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an amount that was thought to be sufficient .
But the Trump vote was so much greater than anticipated that the counting had to be “ halted ” in the “ battleground states ” ; in the “ halted ” time , ballots were manufactured to compensate .
The image of a smooth red curve being overtaken by a blue stepped curve has become the logo of those who believe there were such injections .
This is now quite a large heap of accusations , witness statements and assertions : can these charges @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aside the question of whether U.S. courts can be trusted to rule on such a partisan issue – vide General Flynn ’ s experience ) ?
Or , given the provisions of Article II , Section 1 of the Constitution – “ Each State shall appoint , in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct , a Number of Electors… ” – can sufficient state legislatures be convinced to select Trump-voting Electors ?
We will find out .
But there are certainly too many things to be airily dismissed and there is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ concede until the issue has been fought out to the end .
But , whatever is decided , half the population will be convinced that the election was stolen – indeed a Rasmussen poll in mid-November showed that nearly half the population – including 30 % of Democrats !
– already believes that “ Democrats stole votes or destroyed pro-Trump ballots in several states to ensure that Biden would win ” .
2020 has not been a good year for the United States : COVID-19 has wreaked havoc , the economic gains of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ civil violence and rioting have been common .
A disputed election leaving half the population thinking its candidate was cheated out of office will not make things more peaceful .
Many are speaking of , if not outright civil war , severe civil strife .
And , in a condition of widespread civil strife and who knows what else , what is the future of the Imperium Americanum ?
Many pundits will quote Plehve ’ s alleged remark about the attractiveness of a “ little , victorious war ” to distract the population @ @ @ @ @ @ @ left ?
Afghanistan ?
Iraq ?
Hardly victorious .
It is unlikely that overthrowing Maduro would be very short or , even if it were , that it would distract impassioned American rioters .
A war with Iran would be neither little nor victorious .
A really severe civil war would divide the U.S. military and bring it home .
The consequences of the November 2020 election , whoever winds up in the White House in January , will be long-lasting ; the Imperium will have important concerns at home .
What from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of American resources to deal with problems in the homeland will be welcomed but the dangers of a nuclear state imploding will not .
2021 may make 2020 look like a blessed haven of stability .

The U.S. Election Is Not Over
By: Patrick Armstrong
President Putin is correct not to congratulate Joe Biden on being elected. There are two reasons. The first is that the complex U.S. election process has not finished; therefore, as Trump has not conceded, there is no “President-elect”. The second reason is that the results may be overthrown by reason of fraud. In which case, Putin will, at the end of the story, look smarter than those who rushed to congratulate Biden before the process was complete.
The hearing in the Pennsylvania Senate and the lawsuits filed in Georgia and Michigan in the last week of November were the first public appearance of the fraud arguments and their supporting evidence – although the alternate media had been on the case from the beginning. Contrary to the utterances of the news media, it was only then that the case was presented in its fullest – the previous legal actions having been only preliminary manoeuvring. The evidence for fraud falls under four heads: eyewitness accounts, improbabilities, statistical analysis and the matter of voting machines and their software. It’s difficult to make up numbers – there are relationships and patterns the fraudster may not know about: better to just make up a final percentage à la the USSR. This piece gives a summary of some of the difficulties with the published results; this piece describes some of the “statistical aberrations”.
Parenthetically, one might observe that the U.S. government declares foreign elections to be fraudulent on a mere fraction of this evidence. Or even, as in the case of Belarus, with no proffered evidence at all: no exit polls, no blurry films; nothing at all.
There are now hundreds, if not thousands, of eyewitness accounts of strange happenings – sudden arrivals of ballots, observers kept away, counting stopped but apparently continuing in secret, suspiciously pristine postal ballots, stacks of ballots with only Biden’s name filled out, Trump votes destroyed, suspicious ballot “curing”, signature problems, backdating postal ballots, wandering USB drives, dead people voting, computer “glitches” sending Trump votes to Biden. Many of these are incorporated into affidavits in the lawsuits and may be read and judged by the public. Many eyewitness accounts, of course, can be dismissed for one valid reason or another, but there are too many now, with more appearing, for casual dismissal.
There are improbabilities in the result. Biden received fewer votes than Clinton or Obama in most areas but many more in the “battleground states”. There were striking exceptions in “down-ballot” voting: in the key states there were large differences between the votes for Biden and for the Democratic Senate candidate. There are cases of historically high – almost Soviet-level – turnouts in key precincts in the “battleground states”. There were improbably high turnouts in nursing homes and in group homes. There are many cases where more votes were cast than voters registered. It was generally a bad day for Democratic candidates: seats were lost in the House and in state legislatures but we are expected to believe that Biden won a strong victory. Despite the spectacular difference in enthusiastic crowds, we’re told that more people turned out for Biden on the day. Perhaps any one of these can be explained but can all of them?
Statistical analysis comprises the next grouping of evidence. We see that votes for Biden, most of the time, and votes for Trump, all of the time, roughly accord with the curve of Benford’s Law. But in those areas where Biden needed the votes, they do not. Violations of Benford’s Law are commonly used by forensic accountants to indicate fraud. An analysis of moving averages over time shows a settled ratio of votes for Biden with a sudden jump in the hours when counting was “stopped”. In some cases votes seem to have been processed faster than physically possible. Other analyses point to suspicious spikes of votes for Biden. A number of statisticians have been attracted to the question and their analyses suggesting fraud are appearing. Again there are too many of these pointers – all of them in the same direction – to be easily dismissed.
Finally there is the whole collection of problems with some voting machines – especially Dominion – and their associated software. The argument is that the machines and software were specifically designed to produce fraudulent results: totals can be changed, votes switched from one candidate to another, incoming vote weighted in favour of one candidate and so on. There are affidavits to this effect. U.S. Embassy cables and previous investigations had shown problems with Dominion machines but, nonetheless, they and the associated software were widely used in 2020. There is possible foreign involvement in these important machines: many parts are made in China; affidavits claim that voting tallies were sent to other countries on the Internet and were massaged there and that passwords into the system were widely available. A computer security expert attests that “hundreds of thousands of votes” were transferred from Trump to Biden by the machines. These issues are attracting computer programmers and hackers and there are now a number of videos on the Internet showing how easily the machines can be hacked.
In summary, the argument is that the machines were programmed to rig the vote in the key states (and perhaps everywhere) by an amount that was thought to be sufficient. But the Trump vote was so much greater than anticipated that the counting had to be “halted” in the “battleground states”; in the “halted” time, ballots were manufactured to compensate. The image of a smooth red curve being overtaken by a blue stepped curve has become the logo of those who believe there were such injections.
This is now quite a large heap of accusations, witness statements and assertions: can these charges be proved in a court (leaving aside the question of whether U.S. courts can be trusted to rule on such a partisan issue – vide General Flynn’s experience)? Or, given the provisions of Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution – “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors…” – can sufficient state legislatures be convinced to select Trump-voting Electors? We will find out. But there are certainly too many things to be airily dismissed and there is nothing to suggest that either side will concede until the issue has been fought out to the end.
But, whatever is decided, half the population will be convinced that the election was stolen – indeed a Rasmussen poll in mid-November showed that nearly half the population – including 30% of Democrats! – already believes that “Democrats stole votes or destroyed pro-Trump ballots in several states to ensure that Biden would win”.
2020 has not been a good year for the United States: COVID-19 has wreaked havoc, the economic gains of the past few years have eroded, civil violence and rioting have been common. A disputed election leaving half the population thinking its candidate was cheated out of office will not make things more peaceful. Many are speaking of, if not outright civil war, severe civil strife.
And, in a condition of widespread civil strife and who knows what else, what is the future of the Imperium Americanum? Many pundits will quote Plehve’s alleged remark about the attractiveness of a “little, victorious war” to distract the population. But what little wars are there left? Afghanistan? Iraq? Hardly victorious. It is unlikely that overthrowing Maduro would be very short or, even if it were, that it would distract impassioned American rioters. A war with Iran would be neither little nor victorious. A really severe civil war would divide the U.S. military and bring it home. The consequences of the November 2020 election, whoever winds up in the White House in January, will be long-lasting; the Imperium will have important concerns at home.
What from Moscow’s perspective? The ingathering of American resources to deal with problems in the homeland will be welcomed but the dangers of a nuclear state imploding will not. 2021 may make 2020 look like a blessed haven of stability.
••••
About the Author: Patrick Armstrong was an analyst in the Canadian Department of National Defence specialising in the USSR/Russia from 1984 and a Counsellor in the Canadian Embassy in Moscow in 1993-1996. He retired in 2008 and has been writing on Russia and related subjects on the Net ever since. •••• The above article (The U.S. Election Is Not Over) was originally created on, and published by Strategic Culture Foundation and is republished here with permission and attribution to the articles author Patrick Armstrong and strategic-culture.org.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-06--Those Portuguese Judges Ruling Against PCR Test Got Official Backlash

Two appeal court judges in Lisbon are at risk of being ‘ disciplined ’ for a 34-page ruling in which they justified their reasons for releasing four German tourists from confinement in the Azores ( click here ) .
The Superior Council of Magistrature ( SCM ) will be ‘ appreciating ’ this matter ( in other words , deciding whether the two judges should be ‘ disciplined ’ ) on December 2 ( Wednesday ) .
The social media movement Juristas Pela Verdade has organised a protest outside the SCM building in Lisbon from 9am on that day , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to destroy the rule of law in Portugal ” .
This may sound like an ‘ academic issue ’ but it goes to the very heart of the current crisis : the fact that an official narrative appears to be the only one ‘ allowed ’ , even for members of the judiciary who have studied scientific opinions in order to rule on appeals .
In this case , the appeal was lodged by ARS dos Açores – the regional health authority which disagreed with a lower court having granted a writ of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ held in a hotel because one of them had registered positive following a routine PCR test .
None of the tourists showed any symptoms of Covid-19 , but were held in isolation in their hotel for more than 10 days .
The judges – Margarida Ramos de Almeida and Ana Paramés – went to great pains to assess whether or not there were indeed legal grounds for the tourists ’ enforced confinement .
They decided there were not .
‘ Specialists ’ accused the legislators of being wrong , and irresponsible – and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the various specialist opinions are to be weighed by the CSM/SCM against those proffered by two appeal court judges .
Says Juristas pela Verdade in a post outlining Wednesday ’ s protest , the judges ’ decision “ fell like a bomb on the official narrative , on the basis of which thousands of Portuguese have been ordered into house arrest ” .
And it sees the CSM intervention as “ unacceptable interference by an administrative branch in a sovereign body of judicial power , aiming at control of the latter in what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ blow to the rule of law ” .
Says the movement , the message to other courts is loud and clear “ consequences may arise if they decide in the opposite direction to the official narrative ” .
For citizens , “ it means they can not count on the independence of the courts or judges ” .
In Juristas pela Verdade ’ s opinion the judges ’ assessment of this situation was not ‘ wrong ’ nor ‘ irresponsible ’ , it was “ brilliant and courageous ” .
And for that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people as possible to demonstrate outside the CSM building next Wednesday .

Two appeal court judges in Lisbon are at risk of being ‘disciplined’ for a 34-page ruling in which they justified their reasons for releasing four German tourists from confinement in the Azores (click here).
The Superior Council of Magistrature (SCM) will be ‘appreciating’ this matter (in other words, deciding whether the two judges should be ‘disciplined’) on December 2 (Wednesday).
The social media movement Juristas Pela Verdade has organised a protest outside the SCM building in Lisbon from 9am on that day, describing the situation as “an attempt to destroy the rule of law in Portugal”.
This may sound like an ‘academic issue’ but it goes to the very heart of the current crisis: the fact that an official narrative appears to be the only one ‘allowed’, even for members of the judiciary who have studied scientific opinions in order to rule on appeals.
In this case, the appeal was lodged by ARS dos Açores – the regional health authority which disagreed with a lower court having granted a writ of Habeas corpus lodged by four German tourists held in a hotel because one of them had registered positive following a routine PCR test. None of the tourists showed any symptoms of Covid-19, but were held in isolation in their hotel for more than 10 days.
The judges – Margarida Ramos de Almeida and Ana Paramés – went to great pains to assess whether or not there were indeed legal grounds for the tourists’ enforced confinement. They decided there were not.
…
‘Specialists’ accused the legislators of being wrong, and irresponsible – and now we are at the point where the various specialist opinions are to be weighed by the CSM/SCM against those proffered by two appeal court judges.
Says Juristas pela Verdade in a post outlining Wednesday’s protest, the judges’ decision “fell like a bomb on the official narrative, on the basis of which thousands of Portuguese have been ordered into house arrest”.
And it sees the CSM intervention as “unacceptable interference by an administrative branch in a sovereign body of judicial power, aiming at control of the latter in what can only be characterised as a violent blow to the rule of law”.
Says the movement, the message to other courts is loud and clear “consequences may arise if they decide in the opposite direction to the official narrative”.
For citizens, “it means they cannot count on the independence of the courts or judges”.
In Juristas pela Verdade’s opinion the judges’ assessment of this situation was not ‘wrong’ nor ‘irresponsible’, it was “brilliant and courageous”. And for that reason the movement is asking as many people as possible to demonstrate outside the CSM building next Wednesday.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-06--Mancock’s Pants Ablaze! (Again)

Mancock’s Pants Ablaze! (Again)

Hatt Mancock just told the most scurrilous lies to the House and to the British people .
If you read the article below , you will understand the enormity of the crime this scumbag has committed .
It is probably a measure of just how wet or treasonous our Parliament is that this pycho can disrespect the British people with the most calculating , bare-faced , irresponsible , reckless and deadly lies and not raise so much as a freakin ’ eyebrow among the feckless poseurs that occupy the benches of Puppet Show Central Clearly this criminal knows he can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ destructive untruths that could well put millions of lives at risk – and not even bother to hide very much the fact that he is lying – secure in the knowledge that there is nobody in the British establishment who cares enough to do a damn thing about it .
My dear old dad had a saying for such people , “ All mouth and no trousers ” ( Trousers =pants for my American readers ) .
So Mancock ’ s are on fire and Parliament isn ’ t wearing any If Manock @ @ @ @ @ @ @ let us not forget who lied about it and who stood by and let him do it .
These people will have the blood of UK citizens on their hands .
This is Matthew Hancock announcing the “ milestone ” of an MHRA approved “ vaccine ” to the House of Commons yesterday .
He reiterated his promise that “ no vaccine will be used until its safety and effectiveness have been clearly established ” .
He added that the Pfizer formulation had been “ subjected to the closest scrutiny of the MHRA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ authorisation ” .
“ This , ” he stated baldly , “ is a vaccine we can all believe in ” .
He finally bragged that “ this is the first vaccine in the world to have achieved regulatory approval for use against Covid19 ” .
He further lied to BBCNews viewers earlier in the day , as he told them , “ when this vaccine is rolled out , things will get better and we will all return to normality and the things we love ” .
He doesn ’ t know @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – and this is emphatically not what the MHRA Pfizer decision says .
I apologise now for having to resort to The Science Bit .
It is however vital that this reckless little man is held to account .
I am indebted to Slog reader Martin for digging out the somewhat obscure links on the MHRA website .
The reality of what the regulator has decided blows Hancock ’ s claims out of the water .
Its safety and effectiveness have not been “ clearly established ” .
The Pfizer product has been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the emergency Covid19 legal instruments so eagerly approved by our braindead MPs earlier this year .
Following Halfcock ’ s triumphalist Commons announcement yesterday , not a peep has emanated from Her Majesty ’ s Opposition pointing out the Grand Canyon of gap between what the Health Secretary claimed , and what the MHRA has “ approved ” .
Further evidence of how the British Establishment now does what it likes , free from fear of any resistance of a legal , judicial or constitutional nature .
Manflu Halfcock when he said this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in .
He when he said it had full regulatory approval .
He when he said safety and efficacy had been established .
He when he assured the House that this was the beginning of a return to normal .
But then , I ’ d imagine over-exposure to a Prime Minister who lied about Newscorp phone hacking , Elm House paedophilia , Yeo taxi emissions , Skripal guilt and the EU Withdrawal Agreement might well have that effect on an over-promoted Secretary of State .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

There’s no Smoke Without Fibs
by Steve Cook
Hatt Mancock just told the most scurrilous lies to the House and to the British people. If you read the article below, you will understand the enormity of the crime this scumbag has committed.
It is probably a measure of just how wet or treasonous our Parliament is that this pycho can disrespect the British people with the most calculating, bare-faced, irresponsible, reckless and deadly lies and not raise so much as a freakin’ eyebrow among the feckless poseurs that occupy the benches of Puppet Show Central
Clearly this criminal knows he can brazenly utter the most appallingly misleading and destructive untruths that could well put millions of lives at risk – and not even bother to hide very much the fact that he is lying – secure in the knowledge that there is nobody in the British establishment who cares enough to do a damn thing about it.
My dear old dad had a saying for such people, “All mouth and no trousers” (Trousers =pants for my American readers).
So Mancock’s are on fire and Parliament isn’t wearing any
If Manock’s magic potion starts killing people let us not forget who lied about it and who stood by and let him do it. These people will have the blood of UK citizens on their hands.
EXCLUSIVE: How Health Secretary Matt Hancock misled Parliament about the Pfizer “vaccine” by John Ward
This is Matthew Hancock announcing the “milestone” of an MHRA approved “vaccine” to the House of Commons yesterday.
He reiterated his promise that “no vaccine will be used until its safety and effectiveness have been clearly established”.
He added that the Pfizer formulation had been “subjected to the closest scrutiny of the MHRA” and been given “a clinical authorisation”.
“This,” he stated baldly, “is a vaccine we can all believe in”.
He finally bragged that “this is the first vaccine in the world to have achieved regulatory approval for use against Covid19”.
Mr Hancock lied to the House.
He further lied to BBCNews viewers earlier in the day, as he told them, “when this vaccine is rolled out, things will get better and we will all return to normality and the things we love”.
He doesn’t know that – he cannot know that – and this is emphatically not what the MHRA Pfizer decision says.
I apologise now for having to resort to The Science Bit. It is however vital that this reckless little man is held to account. I am indebted to Slog reader Martin for digging out the somewhat obscure links on the MHRA website.
The reality of what the regulator has decided blows Hancock’s claims out of the water.
You can get the full strength of such “approval” as has been given here
These are the key facts about the Pfizer-Biontech product’s assessment under Reg174 at the MRHA: This medicinal product does not have a UK marketing authorisation but has been given authorisation for temporary supply by the UK Department of Health and Social Care
It has no approval at all for people aged under 16
The administration of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 should be postponed in individuals suffering from acute severe febrile illness
No interaction or contraindication studies have been performed. In the absence of compatibility studies, this medicinal product must not be mixed with other medicinal products.
COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy. For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination
It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is excreted in human milk
The effects of the vaccine on fertility are unknown
Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions via the Coronavirus Yellow Card reporting site https://coronavirus-yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/ The MHRA was given just five days to study the mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2.
Hancock called this “the closest scrutiny”.
Its safety and effectiveness have not been “clearly established”.
The Pfizer product has been given a temporary, narrow approval under the emergency Covid19 legal instruments so eagerly approved by our braindead MPs earlier this year.
Following Halfcock’s triumphalist Commons announcement yesterday, not a peep has emanated from Her Majesty’s Opposition pointing out the Grand Canyon of gap between what the Health Secretary claimed, and what the MHRA has “approved”.
Further evidence of how the British Establishment now does what it likes, free from fear of any resistance of a legal, judicial or constitutional nature.
Manflu Halfcock lied when he said this is a vaccine we can all believe in.
He lied when he said it had full regulatory approval.
He lied when he said safety and efficacy had been established.
He lied when he assured the House that this was the beginning of a return to normal.
But then, I’d imagine over-exposure to a Prime Minister who lied about Newscorp phone hacking, Elm House paedophilia, Yeo taxi emissions, Skripal guilt and the EU Withdrawal Agreement might well have that effect on an over-promoted Secretary of State.
This featured article is from The Slog Visit The Slog now for many more GREAT articles
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-06--What’s Not Being Said About the Pfizer Coronavirus Vaccine … “Human Guinea Pigs”?

What ’ s Not Being Said About the Pfizer Coronavirus Vaccine .
“ Human Guinea Pigs ” ?
Bill Gates is actively financing and promoting new untested vaccines supposed to keep us at least somewhat safe from a ‘ ghastly ” death from the novel coronavirus and supposedly allow us to resume somewhat “ normal ” lives .
The Pharma giant Pfizer has now announced what they claim were spectacular results in initial human tests .
They use an experimental technology known as gene editing , specifically mRNA gene-editing , something never before used in vaccines .
Before we rush @ @ @ @ @ @ @ immunity , we should know more about the radical experimental technology and its lack of precision .
The financial world went ballistic on November 9 when the pharma giant Pfizer and its German partner , BioNTech , announced in a company press release that it had developed a vaccine for Covid19 that was “ 90 % ” effective .
The controversial US head of NIAID , Tony Fauci ( right ) rushed to greet the news and the EU announced it had purchased 300 million doses of the costly new vaccine .
If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is all but past history .
However it seems Albert Bourla , the CEO of Pfizer , doesn ’ t share the confidence of his own claims .
On the day his company issued its press release on the proposed vaccine trials , he sold 62 % of his stock in Pfizer , making millions profit in the deal .
He made the sell order in a special option in August so it would not appear as “ insider selling ” , however he also timed it just after the US elections and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ President-elect .
It seems from appearances that Bourla had a pretty clear conflict of interest in the timing of his press release on the same day .
Bourla lied and denied to the Press that his company had received any funds from the Trump Administration to develop the vaccine when it came out they contracted in summer to deliver 100 million doses to the US Government .
Further adding to the suspect actions of Pfizer was the fact the company first informed the team of Joe Biden rather than the relevant US government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the only thing alarming about the much hyped Pfizer announcement .
Pfizer , famous for its Viagra and other drugs , has partnered with a small Mainz , Germany company , BioNTech , which has developed the radical mRNA technique used to produce the new corona vaccine .
BioNTech was only founded in 2008 .
BioNTech signed an agreement with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in September , 2019 , just before announcement in Wuhan China of the Novel Coronavirus and just before BioNTech made its stock market debut .
The agreement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to treat cancer and HIV .
Curiously that press release , “ The Gates Foundation sees BioNTech potential to ‘ dramatically reduce global HIV and tuberculosis ’ ” 05 .
September 2019 , has now been deleted .
BioNTech also has an agreement with one of the largest drug producers in China , Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical Co. , Ltd ( “ Fosun Pharma ” ) to develop a version of its mRNA vaccine for novel coronavirus for the Chinese market .
Ai-Min Hui , President of Global R & D of Fosun Pharma @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dosing the first Chinese subject with BNT162b1 marks a milestone of the global co-development program in China .
We are closely working with BioNTech and regulatory authorities to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BNT162b1 and other mRNA vaccine candidates… ” This means that the same German biotech company is behind the covid vaccines being rushed out in China as well as the USA and EU .
The vaccine is being rushed through to eventual approval in an alarmingly short time .
Both US and EU authorities and presumably also Chinese , waived @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mice and have gone straight to human “ guinea pigs.
” Human tests began in late July and early August .
Three months is unheard of for testing a new vaccine .
Several years is the norm .
Because of the degree of global panic engendered by WHO over the coronavirus , caution is thrown to the wind .
Vaccine makers all have legal indemnity , meaning they can ’ t be sued if people die or are maimed from the new vaccine .
But the most alarming fact about the new Pfizer-BioNTech @ @ @ @ @ @ @ edited mRNA for human vaccine application has never before been approved .
Notably , two year peer reviewed tests with mice fed genetically modified corn sprayed with Monsanto glyphosate-rich Roundup first showed cancer tumors after nine months as well as liver and other organ damage .
Earlier Monsanto company tests ended at three months and claimed no harm .
A similar situation exists with the gene edited mRNA vaccines that are being rushed out after less than 90 days human tests .
Dr. Michael Yeadon replied in a recent public social media comment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ All vaccines against the SARS-COV-2 virus are by definition novel .
No candidate vaccine has been… in development for more than a few months.
” Yeadon then went on to declare , “ If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not EXPLICITLY experimental , I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent .
This is because there are precisely zero human volunteers for…whom there could possibly be more than a few months past-dose safety information.
” Yeadon is well qualified to make the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comment , “ I have a degree in Biochemistry & Toxicology & a research based PhD in pharmacology .
I have spent 32 years working in pharmaceutical R & D , mostly in new medicines for disorders of lung & skin .
I was a VP at Pfizer & CEO… .
of a biotech I founded ( Ziarco – acquired by Novartis ) .
I ’ m knowledgeable about new medicine R & D. ” He was formerly with Pfizer at a very senior level .
The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is experimental and far @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that Pfizer , the EU and the notorious Dr Tony Fauci seem ready to roll it out even before year end to hundreds of millions of humans .
The experimental technology is based on a rather new gene manipulation known as gene editing .
In a major article in the 2018 New York Council on Foreign Relations magazine , Foreign Affairs , Bill Gates effusively promoted the novel gene editing CRISPR technology as being able to “ transform global development.
” He noted that his Gates Foundation had been financing gene editing developments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decade .
But is the technology for breaking and splicing of human genes so absolutely safe that it is worth risking on a novel experimental vaccine never before used on humans ?
Contrary to what Bill Gates claims , the scientific answer is no , it is not proven so safe .
In a peer reviewed article in the October , 2020 journal Trends in Genetics , the authors conclude that “ the range of possible molecular events resulting from genome editing has been underestimated and the technology remains unpredictable on , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dr. Romeo Quijano , retired professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology at the College of Medicine , University of the Philippines Manila , noted some of the dangers of the experimental gene editing when applied to human vaccines .
Quijano warns of , He cites the case of another Gates mRNA vaccine candidate , Moderna , where “ three of the 15 human experimental subjects in the high dose group suffered serious and medically significant symptoms .
Moderna , however , concluded that the vaccine was “ generally safe and well tolerated , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ covering-up the real danger… ” Bill Gates , the mRNA vaccine makers including Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna , and their close allies such as Dr. Tony Fauci of the NIAID are clearly playing fast and loose with human lives in their rush to get these experimental vaccines into our bodies .
Notably , the same Dr. Fauci and his NIAID owns the patent on a vaccine for dengue fever known as Dengvaxia , marketed by Sanofi-Pasteur and promoted as an “ essential ” vaccine by Tedros ’ WHO since 2016 .
Robert F. Kennedy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and NIAID “ knew from the clinical trials that there was a problem with paradoxical immune response , ” but they gave it to several hundred thousand Filipino kids anyway .
It was estimated that as many as 600 vaccinated children died before the government stopped the vaccinations .
Clearly the well-established Precautionary Principle–if in serious doubt , don ’ t– is being ignored by Fauci , Pfizer/BioNTech and others in rushing to approve the new mRNA vaccine for coronavirus .
Messenger RNA technology has yet to produce an approved medicine , let @ @ @ @

What’s Not Being Said About the Pfizer Coronavirus Vaccine. “Human Guinea Pigs”?
By: F. William Engdahl
Bill Gates is actively financing and promoting new untested vaccines supposed to keep us at least somewhat safe from a ‘ghastly” death from the novel coronavirus and supposedly allow us to resume somewhat “normal” lives. The Pharma giant Pfizer has now announced what they claim were spectacular results in initial human tests. They use an experimental technology known as gene editing, specifically mRNA gene-editing, something never before used in vaccines. Before we rush to get jabbed in hopes of some immunity, we should know more about the radical experimental technology and its lack of precision.
The financial world went ballistic on November 9 when the pharma giant Pfizer and its German partner, BioNTech, announced in a company press release that it had developed a vaccine for Covid19 that was “90%” effective.
The controversial US head of NIAID, Tony Fauci (right) rushed to greet the news and the EU announced it had purchased 300 million doses of the costly new vaccine. If you believe financial markets, the pandemic is all but past history.
Suspicious events
However it seems Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, doesn’t share the confidence of his own claims. On the day his company issued its press release on the proposed vaccine trials, he sold 62% of his stock in Pfizer, making millions profit in the deal. He made the sell order in a special option in August so it would not appear as “insider selling”, however he also timed it just after the US elections and the mainstream media illegitimately declared Joe Biden President-elect. It seems from appearances that Bourla had a pretty clear conflict of interest in the timing of his press release on the same day.
Bourla lied and denied to the Press that his company had received any funds from the Trump Administration to develop the vaccine when it came out they contracted in summer to deliver 100 million doses to the US Government. Further adding to the suspect actions of Pfizer was the fact the company first informed the team of Joe Biden rather than the relevant US government agencies.
But this is far from the only thing alarming about the much hyped Pfizer announcement.
The German Partner
Pfizer, famous for its Viagra and other drugs, has partnered with a small Mainz, Germany company, BioNTech, which has developed the radical mRNA technique used to produce the new corona vaccine. BioNTech was only founded in 2008. BioNTech signed an agreement with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in September, 2019, just before announcement in Wuhan China of the Novel Coronavirus and just before BioNTech made its stock market debut. The agreement involved cooperation on developing new mRNA techniques to treat cancer and HIV. Curiously that press release, “The Gates Foundation sees BioNTech potential to ‘dramatically reduce global HIV and tuberculosis’” 05. September 2019, has now been deleted.
BioNTech also has an agreement with one of the largest drug producers in China, Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd (“Fosun Pharma”) to develop a version of its mRNA vaccine for novel coronavirus for the Chinese market. Ai-Min Hui, President of Global R&D of Fosun Pharma said in an August statement, “Dosing the first Chinese subject with BNT162b1 marks a milestone of the global co-development program in China. We are closely working with BioNTech and regulatory authorities to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BNT162b1 and other mRNA vaccine candidates…”
This means that the same German biotech company is behind the covid vaccines being rushed out in China as well as the USA and EU. The vaccine is being rushed through to eventual approval in an alarmingly short time.
Both US and EU authorities and presumably also Chinese, waived the standard animal tests using ferrets or mice and have gone straight to human “guinea pigs.” Human tests began in late July and early August. Three months is unheard of for testing a new vaccine. Several years is the norm. Because of the degree of global panic engendered by WHO over the coronavirus, caution is thrown to the wind. Vaccine makers all have legal indemnity, meaning they can’t be sued if people die or are maimed from the new vaccine. But the most alarming fact about the new Pfizer-BioNTech gene edited vaccine is that the gene edited mRNA for human vaccine application has never before been approved. Notably, two year peer reviewed tests with mice fed genetically modified corn sprayed with Monsanto glyphosate-rich Roundup first showed cancer tumors after nine months as well as liver and other organ damage. Earlier Monsanto company tests ended at three months and claimed no harm. A similar situation exists with the gene edited mRNA vaccines that are being rushed out after less than 90 days human tests.
FDA Lets Pfizer Test Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine on U.S. Children
“Explicitly experimental”
Dr. Michael Yeadon replied in a recent public social media comment to a colleague in the UK; “All vaccines against the SARS-COV-2 virus are by definition novel. No candidate vaccine has been… in development for more than a few months.” Yeadon then went on to declare,
“If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not EXPLICITLY experimental, I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent. This is because there are precisely zero human volunteers for…whom there could possibly be more than a few months past-dose safety information.”
Yeadon is well qualified to make the critique. As he notes in the comment, “I have a degree in Biochemistry & Toxicology & a research based PhD in pharmacology. I have spent 32 years working in pharmaceutical R&D, mostly in new medicines for disorders of lung & skin. I was a VP at Pfizer & CEO…. of a biotech I founded (Ziarco – acquired by Novartis). I’m knowledgeable about new medicine R&D.” He was formerly with Pfizer at a very senior level.
Human guinea pigs?
The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is experimental and far from guaranteed safe, despite the fact that Pfizer, the EU and the notorious Dr Tony Fauci seem ready to roll it out even before year end to hundreds of millions of humans.
The experimental technology is based on a rather new gene manipulation known as gene editing. In a major article in the 2018 New York Council on Foreign Relations magazine, Foreign Affairs, Bill Gates effusively promoted the novel gene editing CRISPR technology as being able to “transform global development.” He noted that his Gates Foundation had been financing gene editing developments for vaccines and other applications for a decade.
But is the technology for breaking and splicing of human genes so absolutely safe that it is worth risking on a novel experimental vaccine never before used on humans? Contrary to what Bill Gates claims, the scientific answer is no, it is not proven so safe.
In a peer reviewed article in the October, 2020 journal Trends in Genetics, the authors conclude that “the range of possible molecular events resulting from genome editing has been underestimated and the technology remains unpredictable on, and away from, the target locus.”
Dr. Romeo Quijano, retired professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology at the College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, noted some of the dangers of the experimental gene editing when applied to human vaccines. Quijano warns of,
“the danger that the vaccine might actually “enhance” the pathogenicity of the virus, or make it more aggressive possibly due to antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), as what happened with previous studies on test vaccines in animals. If that should happen in a major human trial the outcome could be disastrous. This serious adverse effect may not even be detected by a clinical trial especially in highly biased clinical trials laden with conflicts of interest involving vaccine companies. Even when a serious adverse event is detected, this is usually swept under the rug.”
He cites the case of another Gates mRNA vaccine candidate, Moderna, where “three of the 15 human experimental subjects in the high dose group suffered serious and medically significant symptoms. Moderna, however, concluded that the vaccine was “generally safe and well tolerated,” which the corporate-dominated media dutifully reported, covering-up the real danger…”
He notes,
“Exogenous mRNA is inherently immune-stimulatory, and this feature of mRNA could be beneficial or detrimental. It may provide adjuvant activity and it may inhibit antigen expression and negatively affect the immune response. The paradoxical effects of innate immune sensing on different formats of mRNA vaccines are incompletely understood.” Quijano adds, “A mRNA-based vaccine could also induce potent type I interferon responses, which have been associated not only with inflammation but also potentially with autoimmunity… and may promote blood coagulation and pathological thrombus formation.”
Quijano writes in the extensively documented article,
“among other dangers, the virus-vectored vaccines could undergo recombination with naturally occurring viruses and produce hybrid viruses that could have undesirable properties affecting transmission or virulence. The…possible outcomes of recombination are practically impossible to quantify accurately given existing tools and knowledge. The risks, however, are real, as exemplified by the emergence of mutant types of viruses, enhanced pathogenicity and unexpected serious adverse events (including death) following haphazard mass vaccination campaigns and previous failed attempts to develop chimeric vaccines using genetic engineering technology.”
Bill Gates, the mRNA vaccine makers including Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna, and their close allies such as Dr. Tony Fauci of the NIAID are clearly playing fast and loose with human lives in their rush to get these experimental vaccines into our bodies. Notably, the same Dr. Fauci and his NIAID owns the patent on a vaccine for dengue fever known as Dengvaxia, marketed by Sanofi-Pasteur and promoted as an “essential” vaccine by Tedros’ WHO since 2016. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (right) noted that Fauci and NIAID “knew from the clinical trials that there was a problem with paradoxical immune response,” but they gave it to several hundred thousand Filipino kids anyway. It was estimated that as many as 600 vaccinated children died before the government stopped the vaccinations.
Clearly the well-established Precautionary Principle–if in serious doubt, don’t– is being ignored by Fauci, Pfizer/BioNTech and others in rushing to approve the new mRNA vaccine for coronavirus. Messenger RNA technology has yet to produce an approved medicine, let alone a vaccine.
••••
••••
About the Author: F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook” where this article was originally published. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization. Seeds of Destruction: Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation Author Name: F. William Engdahl ISBN Number: 978-0-937147-2-2 Year: 2007 Pages: 341 pages with complete index List Price: $25.95 Special Price: $18.00 This skilfully researched book focuses on how a small socio-political American elite seeks to establish control over the very basis of human survival: the provision of our daily bread. “Control the food and you control the people.” This is no ordinary book about the perils of GMO. Engdahl takes the reader inside the corridors of power, into the backrooms of the science labs, behind closed doors in the corporate boardrooms. The author cogently reveals a diabolical world of profit-driven political intrigue, government corruption and coercion, where genetic manipulation and the patenting of life forms are used to gain worldwide control over food production. If the book often reads as a crime story, that should come as no surprise. For that is what it is.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-06--Dystopia: Biden’s Planned-Opolis Future Will Enslave America

Under a Biden Presidency , the long-standing plans of globalists to usher in “ Planned-Opolis ” cities will be realized .
A recent headline suggested that Biden will move forward with the smart city plan : “ The Biden Administration Could Be Good for Smart Cities ” : While they are promoted as a futuristic vision of utopia , smart cities around the world utilized smart city technology as “ command and control centers ” to enforce tyrannical COVID lockdowns .
As part of the United Nations Agenda 2030 , the world is moving to construct the cities .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of smart cities in South Korea .
Bill Gates ’ Microsoft played a key role in developing the technology .
South Korea was chosen for the test because , in the words of the city ’ s developers , “ There is an historical expectation of less privacy.
” The New York Times reported : “ Much of this technology was developed in U.S. research labs , but there are fewer social and regulatory obstacles to implementing them in Korea , ” said Mr. Townsend [ a research director at the Institute for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ] , who consulted on Seoul ’ s own U-city plan , known as Digital Media City .
“ There is an historical expectation of less privacy .
Korea is willing to put off the hard questions to take the early lead and set standards.
” An academic paper released in April of this year outlines how smart cities and artificial intelligence will be used for “ enforcement of guidelines , rules and government orders to contain such future outbreaks “ .
The paper concludes that , “ The proposed architecture and AI @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and timely enforce social distancing community measures , and optimize the use of resources in critical situations.
” India utilized its Varanasi smart city to enforce the COVID lockdown : The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Dystopia: Biden’s Planned-Opolis Future Will Enslave America
By: Daniel Taylor
An academic paper released in April of this year outlines how smart cities and artificial intelligence will be used for “ enforcement of guidelines, rules and government orders to contain such future outbreaks “
Under a Biden Presidency, the long-standing plans of globalists to usher in “Planned-Opolis” cities will be realized.
Watch this foretelling video …

A recent headline suggested that Biden will move forward with the smart city plan: “The Biden Administration Could Be Good for Smart Cities”:
“In general, Biden’s campaign rhetoric has tended to signal good things for urban tech initiatives. The president-elect has promised to “encourage innovation and launch smarter cities” — with a particular eye on transportation.”
While they are promoted as a futuristic vision of utopia, smart cities around the world utilized smart city technology as “command and control centers” to enforce tyrannical COVID lockdowns. As part of the United Nations Agenda 2030, the world is moving to construct the cities.
In 2008, OTN reported on the testing of smart cities in South Korea. Bill Gates’ Microsoft played a key role in developing the technology.
South Korea was chosen for the test because, in the words of the city’s developers, “There is an historical expectation of less privacy.” The New York Times reported:
“Much of this technology was developed in U.S. research labs, but there are fewer social and regulatory obstacles to implementing them in Korea,” said Mr. Townsend [a research director at the Institute for the Future in Palo Alto, California], who consulted on Seoul’s own U-city plan, known as Digital Media City. “There is an historical expectation of less privacy. Korea is willing to put off the hard questions to take the early lead and set standards.”
An academic paper released in April of this year outlines how smart cities and artificial intelligence will be used for “enforcement of guidelines, rules and government orders to contain such future outbreaks“. The paper concludes that, “The proposed architecture and AI assisted applications… can be used to effectively and timely enforce social distancing community measures, and optimize the use of resources in critical situations.”
China is building “COVID-proof” cities “with future lockdowns in mind“.
India utilized its Varanasi smart city to enforce the COVID lockdown:
“To keep a tight vigil on the movement of people during the lockdown and tab on home-quarantined people infected with covid-19, Varanasi, the PM’s own constituency, is using CCTVs and geographic information system (GIS) technology accessed through its integrated command and control centre (ICCC) set up under the smart city mission.”
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-06--Covid 19 Vaccines: Paving The Way For The Surveillance State

Covid 19 Vaccines : Paving The Way For The Surveillance State Like so many other “ crises ” that preceded it , the Covid-19 “ pandemic ” has provided fertile territory for the authoritarians who seize any opportunity to destroy freedom and liberty under the false claim of “ keeping us safe.
” The PATRIOT Act passed after 9/11 was supposed to do the same thing : keep us safe by targeting the terrorists who wanted to kill us .
But as we learned from Ed Snowden shortly afterward , it was a lie .
The PATRIOT Act was designed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be spied on , tracked , and harassed .
The Covid “ crisis ” and coming vaccine will be the same .
Will Americans resist ?
Also today , more Covid Hypocrites – from Austin to California .
And an LA County mayor claims anyone without a mask is a “ domestic terrorist.
” This article ( Covid 19 Vaccines : Paving The Way For The Surveillance State ) was originally created and published by the Ron Paul Instituteand is republished here with permission and with attribution to author Daniel McAdams and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Paul Institute The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the copyright owner .
Disclaimer : The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including , but not limited to , text , graphics , images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction .
Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice , diagnosis or treatment .

Covid 19 Vaccines: Paving The Way For The Surveillance State
By: Daniel McAdams
Like so many other “crises” that preceded it, the Covid-19 “pandemic” has provided fertile territory for the authoritarians who seize any opportunity to destroy freedom and liberty under the false claim of “keeping us safe.” The PATRIOT Act passed after 9/11 was supposed to do the same thing: keep us safe by targeting the terrorists who wanted to kill us. But as we learned from Ed Snowden shortly afterward, it was a lie. The PATRIOT Act was designed to view us as the enemy, to be spied on, tracked, and harassed. The Covid “crisis” and coming vaccine will be the same. Will Americans resist? Also today, more Covid Hypocrites – from Austin to California. And an LA County mayor claims anyone without a mask is a “domestic terrorist.” Watch this episode of Liberty Report: •••• This article (Covid 19 Vaccines: Paving The Way For The Surveillance State) was originally created and published by the Ron Paul Instituteand is republished here with permission and with attribution to author Daniel McAdams and ronpaulinstitute.org. Please donate to the Ron Paul Institute •••• •••• Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-06--Election Fraud, Political Corruption & Its Consequences

Like Scott S. Powell , I think this presidential election was marked by very obvious fraud .
It ’ s not new , but the scope of it is breathtaking .
The Heritage Foundation has compiled an election fraud database , sampling the many proven instances of election fraud , which you are welcome to review .
I can not dispute their conclusion : Each and every one of the cases in this database represents an instance in which a public official , usually a prosecutor , thought it serious enough to act upon it .
And each and every @ @ @ @ @ @ @ individual had engaged in wrongdoing in connection with an election hoping to affect its outcome — or that the results of an election were sufficiently in question and had to be overturned .
It is important to remember that every fraudulent vote that is cast invalidates the vote of an eligible voter , effectively disenfranchising that voter .
In addition to diluting the votes of legitimate voters , fraud can have an impact in close elections , and we have many close elections in this country .
This database is not an exhaustive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ capture all cases and certainly does not capture reported instances or allegations of election fraud , some of which may be meritorious , that are not investigated or prosecuted .
Because of vulnerabilities in the system , election fraud is relatively easy to commit and difficult to detect after-the-fact .
Moreover , some public officials appear to be unconcerned with election fraud and fail to pursue cases that are reported to them .
It is a general truism that you don ’ t find what you don ’ t look for .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the election system and the many ways in which fraud is committed .
Preventing , deterring , and prosecuting election fraud is essential to protecting the integrity of our voting process .
Reforms intended to ensure election integrity do not disenfranchise voters and , in fact , protect their right to vote .
Winning elections leads to political power and the incentives to take advantage of security vulnerabilities are great , so it is important that we take reasonable steps to make it hard to cheat , while making it easy for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to have an electoral process that they can trust and that protects their most sacred right , and they have the right to know when the integrity of that process is imperiled .
The challenges now are winding their way through various courts and state legislatures .
There are too many for me to provide an up-to-the-minute summary , but shipwreckedcrew , a lawyer with 22 years of experience as a U.S. attorney , does an exceptional job explaining the difficulties of prosecuting post-election challenges .
The short time frame and the fact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the hands of the defendants — things like voter registration information and signature samples .
This is particularly true this year , he notes : Apart from expert forensic testimony , it ’ s rare that we get eyewitness evidence of obvious fraud , especially this year where in the disputed states various stratagems were employed ( often under the excuse of preventing transmission of COVID-19 to prevent observation or the mysterious midnight “ shutdowns ” in key states during which votes were tallied ) .
This week there was a significant exception @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Freeman , her daughter Shaye Moss , and several other poll workers appear to have engaged in major ballot stuffing after removing the election observers .
They did so on the basis of a phony claim that a water main break meant they were closing down the counting .
Once the watchers were gone , they went to work and the spike in votes for Biden at that time seems to confirm the fraud claim .
They were caught only because there was a camera system in the venue of which they were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ covered the incident this week , and this blog sums it up ( as well as Facebook ’ s absurd effort to hide it ) .
If the facts prove our observations and inferences correct , I doubt that only this handful of poll workers was involved .
The scam seems too intricate not to have involved more people at a higher level .
Will the challenges end in court ?
Will some key state legislatures refuse to certify or challenge the certification in Congress ?
Will Congress vote against certifying some state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the states in question in the Supreme Court , arguing their mishandling of the election diminished the legal votes of those in states that followed rational procedures designed to preclude election tampering ?
I ’ ve no idea .
Certainly the Georgia videotapes put paid to any claim that the challenge there was fanciful and the forensic evidence unreliable .
Will there be criminal proceedings against those who are credibly found to have tampered with the balloting and counting ?
State attorneys general and district attorneys can and should punish fraudsters who defied @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and U.S .
Attorneys can as well — fraud in national elections is within their bailiwick , though if Biden is inaugurated , he will certainly replace Barr and many if not most of the U.S. attorneys who are unlikely to work hard to cast a shadow on a Biden win .
Will there ever be criminal proceedings against the FISA abusers who participated in the anti-Trump Russian collusion smear ?
To date Durham has successfully prosecuted only one person , Kevin Clinesmith , for fraudulently changing an email to support a FISA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sentenced Thursday .
Attorney General Barr made public this week that on October 19 he had upped John Durham ’ s status from U.S. attorney to special counsel .
Naturally , those who saw no problem with then-U.S. attorney Patrick Fitzgerald ’ s appointment to special counsel are arguing that this appointment is illegal because the regulation then and now says the appointment must be made from outside the department .
( Then I thought the Fitzgerald appointment was unconstitutional but there ’ s now precedent that the bar is only by regulation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ precedent works both ways .
If Fitzgerald ’ s appointment was legal , so should Durham ’ s be . )
The appointment means that Durham can file a report at the conclusion of his work , “ it complicates the nomination of Sally Yates , who is widely cited as a front-runner for the position of Attorney General ” as she has an obvious conflict .
Congress failed to pass a relief package though the vindictive and self-serving Speaker said that would be okay now since Trump ( she foresees ) will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
That means people were made to suffer great financial loss at the hands of the very rich premium chocolate ice cream eater to satisfy her partisan pique .
They did pass a bill to legalize pot before they left , though .
This is akin to San Francisco ’ s latest move , which makes it illegal to smoke cigarettes in your own apartment , though smoking pot is fine .
I rather doubt San Francisco law enforcement , which no longer prosecutes shoplifting and public defecation , among other societal transgressions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sniffing for smoke .
On the other hand , there ’ s a business opportunity for you suffering from shutdowns without federal relief : Invent pot scent and sell it to San Francisco ’ s smokers .

Election Fraud, Political Corruption, and its Consequences
By: Clarice Feldman
Like Scott S. Powell, I think this presidential election was marked by very obvious fraud.
Common sense, longstanding predictable voting behavior patterns in many specific jurisdictions, big data statistical pattern analysis and forensic analysis of Dominion Voting Systems machines and software, and polling place wrongdoings in the contested states don’t just reveal garden variety voting irregularities, but rather overwhelming massive voter and polling place fraud.
It’s not new, but the scope of it is breathtaking. The Heritage Foundation has compiled an election fraud database, sampling the many proven instances of election fraud, which you are welcome to review. I cannot dispute their conclusion:
Each and every one of the cases in this database represents an instance in which a public official, usually a prosecutor, thought it serious enough to act upon it. And each and every one ended in a finding that the individual had engaged in wrongdoing in connection with an election hoping to affect its outcome — or that the results of an election were sufficiently in question and had to be overturned. It is important to remember that every fraudulent vote that is cast invalidates the vote of an eligible voter, effectively disenfranchising that voter. In addition to diluting the votes of legitimate voters, fraud can have an impact in close elections, and we have many close elections in this country. This database is not an exhaustive or comprehensive list. It does not capture all cases and certainly does not capture reported instances or allegations of election fraud, some of which may be meritorious, that are not investigated or prosecuted. Because of vulnerabilities in the system, election fraud is relatively easy to commit and difficult to detect after-the-fact. Moreover, some public officials appear to be unconcerned with election fraud and fail to pursue cases that are reported to them. It is a general truism that you don’t find what you don’t look for. This database is intended to demonstrate the vulnerabilities in the election system and the many ways in which fraud is committed. Preventing, deterring, and prosecuting election fraud is essential to protecting the integrity of our voting process. Reforms intended to ensure election integrity do not disenfranchise voters and, in fact, protect their right to vote. Winning elections leads to political power and the incentives to take advantage of security vulnerabilities are great, so it is important that we take reasonable steps to make it hard to cheat, while making it easy for legitimate voters to vote. Americans deserve to have an electoral process that they can trust and that protects their most sacred right, and they have the right to know when the integrity of that process is imperiled.
The challenges now are winding their way through various courts and state legislatures. There are too many for me to provide an up-to-the-minute summary, but shipwreckedcrew, a lawyer with 22 years of experience as a U.S. attorney, does an exceptional job explaining the difficulties of prosecuting post-election challenges. The short time frame and the fact that much of the evidence is in the hands of the defendants — things like voter registration information and signature samples. This is particularly true this year, he notes:
The time frame allowed for an election contest in state statutes NEVER considered the circumstances where hundreds of thousands of ballots were submitted by mail, the process for validating those ballots rested with local officials — often partisan local offices — and the witnesses who might offer pertinent and admissible first-hand testimony are almost all employed by the opposing party in the case.
Apart from expert forensic testimony, it’s rare that we get eyewitness evidence of obvious fraud, especially this year where in the disputed states various stratagems were employed (often under the excuse of preventing transmission of COVID-19 to prevent observation or the mysterious midnight “shutdowns” in key states during which votes were tallied).
This week there was a significant exception in Fulton County, Georgia where Ruby Freeman, her daughter Shaye Moss, and several other poll workers appear to have engaged in major ballot stuffing after removing the election observers. They did so on the basis of a phony claim that a water main break meant they were closing down the counting. Once the watchers were gone, they went to work and the spike in votes for Biden at that time seems to confirm the fraud claim. They were caught only because there was a camera system in the venue of which they were apparently unaware. Andrea Widburg has expertly covered the incident this week, and this blog sums it up (as well as Facebook’s absurd effort to hide it).
If the facts prove our observations and inferences correct, I doubt that only this handful of poll workers was involved. The scam seems too intricate not to have involved more people at a higher level.
Will the challenges end in court? Will some key state legislatures refuse to certify or challenge the certification in Congress? Will Congress vote against certifying some state electoral votes? Will some states sue the states in question in the Supreme Court, arguing their mishandling of the election diminished the legal votes of those in states that followed rational procedures designed to preclude election tampering? I’ve no idea. Certainly the Georgia videotapes put paid to any claim that the challenge there was fanciful and the forensic evidence unreliable.
Will there be criminal proceedings against those who are credibly found to have tampered with the balloting and counting? State attorneys general and district attorneys can and should punish fraudsters who defied state laws. Attorney General William Barr and U.S. Attorneys can as well — fraud in national elections is within their bailiwick, though if Biden is inaugurated, he will certainly replace Barr and many if not most of the U.S. attorneys who are unlikely to work hard to cast a shadow on a Biden win.
Will there ever be criminal proceedings against the FISA abusers who participated in the anti-Trump Russian collusion smear? To date Durham has successfully prosecuted only one person, Kevin Clinesmith, for fraudulently changing an email to support a FISA warrant. Clinesmith is due to be sentenced Thursday. Attorney General Barr made public this week that on October 19 he had upped John Durham’s status from U.S. attorney to special counsel. Naturally, those who saw no problem with then-U.S. attorney Patrick Fitzgerald’s appointment to special counsel are arguing that this appointment is illegal because the regulation then and now says the appointment must be made from outside the department. (Then I thought the Fitzgerald appointment was unconstitutional but there’s now precedent that the bar is only by regulation, not statute, and well — precedent works both ways. If Fitzgerald’s appointment was legal, so should Durham’s be.)
The appointment means that Durham can file a report at the conclusion of his work, “it complicates the nomination of Sally Yates, who is widely cited as a front-runner for the position of Attorney General” as she has an obvious conflict.
Congress failed to pass a relief package though the vindictive and self-serving Speaker said that would be okay now since Trump (she foresees) will no longer be in the White House. That means people were made to suffer great financial loss at the hands of the very rich premium chocolate ice cream eater to satisfy her partisan pique. They did pass a bill to legalize pot before they left, though.
This is akin to San Francisco’s latest move, which makes it illegal to smoke cigarettes in your own apartment, though smoking pot is fine. I rather doubt San Francisco law enforcement, which no longer prosecutes shoplifting and public defecation, among other societal transgressions, will be swarming through apartment complexes sniffing for smoke. On the other hand, there’s a business opportunity for you suffering from shutdowns without federal relief: Invent pot scent and sell it to San Francisco’s smokers.
••••
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-06--Breaking: 22 Dominion Machines Being Examined by Team Trump Experts !! NOW !!

Breaking…22 Dominion machines being examined by Team Trump experts NOW Today , Trump Team experts will examine 22 Dominion machines in Antrim County , Michigan from 8:00 am on for about 10 hours with results in 48 hours .
Antrim is the County with an unexplained switch of 6,000 votes from Trump to Biden .
Dominion said it was a human error .
Jenna Ellis was on Fox & Friends at 7:00 am this morning to explain .
She said she believes that the Supreme Court should hear one or more of these cases , but the challenge right now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ legislatures .
The state legislatures have the constitutional authority to regulate how the delegates are selected to the Electoral College .
Lord Malloch-Brown , the former President of Smartmatic , will run The Open Society Foundations .
It ’ s a nice reward for his efforts — probably to defeat President Trump .
Brown is also the former UN deputy secretary‐general and UK minister .
He was the vice-chairman of Soros ’ s Investment Funds and the deputy secretary-general of the United Nations when he worked as chief of staff to Kofi Annan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are still claiming there ’ s no tie between Soros and our election voting machines and software : Dominion Adviser Offered to Do Anything For Hillary In 2018 , Dominion Voting announced that it had been acquired by its management team and Staple Street Capital , a New York-based private equity firm , who was being advised by Kirkland & Ellis LLP .
During Clinton ’ s campaign , according to an email chain released by WikiLeaks , Kirkland & Ellis LLP partner Kamran S. Bajwa met with John Podesta while offering “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Podesta , at the time , was chair of Hillary Clinton ’ s 2016 U.S. presidential campaign .

Breaking…22 Dominion machines being examined by Team Trump experts NOW
By: M. Dowling
Today, Trump Team experts will examine 22 Dominion machines in Antrim County, Michigan from 8:00 am on for about 10 hours with results in 48 hours. Antrim is the County with an unexplained switch of 6,000 votes from Trump to Biden.
Dominion said it was a human error.
Jenna Ellis was on Fox & Friends at 7:00 am this morning to explain. She said she believes that the Supreme Court should hear one or more of these cases, but the challenge right now is to get it to the state legislatures.
The state legislatures have the constitutional authority to regulate how the delegates are selected to the Electoral College.
Watch:

SMARTMATIC AND DOMINION
Lord Malloch-Brown, the former President of Smartmatic, will run The Open Society Foundations. It’s a nice reward for his efforts — probably to defeat President Trump.
Brown is also the former UN deputy secretary‐general and UK minister. He was the vice-chairman of Soros’s Investment Funds and the deputy secretary-general of the United Nations when he worked as chief of staff to Kofi Annan.
I applaud Patrick Gaspard’s leadership of the Open Society Foundations in a world beset by illiberalism. Mark Malloch-Brown will be Open Society’s new president. He is deeply familiar with its work and shares my vision of philanthropy. https://t.co/DdJk1z3Cq2 — George Soros (@georgesoros) December 4, 2020
The Left and their fake fact-checkers are still claiming there’s no tie between Soros and our election voting machines and software:
Dominion Adviser Offered to Do Anything For Hillary
In 2018, Dominion Voting announced that it had been acquired by its management team and Staple Street Capital, a New York-based private equity firm, who was being advised by Kirkland & Ellis LLP.
During Clinton’s campaign, according to an email chain released by WikiLeaks, Kirkland & Ellis LLP partner Kamran S. Bajwa met with John Podesta while offering “anything” to help Hillary Clinton.
Podesta, at the time, was chair of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 U.S. presidential campaign.