thelibertybeacon--2020-09-26--Rosa Parks Strategy Now at the Back of the Civil Rights Bus

Rosa Parks Strategy Now at the Back of the Civil Rights Bus You may not recognize Ben Crump ’ s name or face , but there ’ s no way you will not recognize his handiwork .
A lawyer for the families of Trayvon Martin , Michael Brown and Jacob Blake , Crump is practicing what Project 21 Co-Chairman Horace Cooper calls “ a new strategy ” for pushing what Crump and his allies consider civil rights progress .
In a Newsmax commentary , Horace laments that this new strategy relies upon “ using individuals whose lives and behavior are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and employs “ a new and ever-expanding definition of equality and civil rights grievance ” that “ denies the significant racial progress America has made.
” Why has this happened ?
Horace suggests race relations in America have gotten to a point where things have become so serene that hyperbole is the only way that those who trade in race can maintain their bases of power : And there is a definitive downside , since by-products of this new strategy including worsening race relations and the accusations and flared tempers we now see @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has benefited Crump and those who subscribe to this new strategy , it ’ s led to billions of dollars of damage to our cities , devastated businesses ( many of them black-owned ) and more unjustified deaths than were originally being protested .
It ’ s also being used by the radical left to try to tear down our nation ’ s cherished institutions that have created a society that was quickly fixing and atoning for the racial disparities of its past .
All of this also does a great disservice to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as Rosa Parks , whom Horace notes epitomized the way the civil rights movement successfully sought justice : [ That ] model – supporting upstanding members of the community when their rights are violated – proved highly successful and ultimately led to a broad consensus in America for the full implementation of our Founders ’ vision of citizen equality before the law .
One major additional achievement was that it was an occasion for blacks and whites to work together albeit at great sacrifice – personal and financial .
But those days are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Horace advises : “ Elites in the media and within the civil rights community would be well served to remember Rosa Parks ’ s legacy .
She was decent and morally upright.
” To read all of Horace ’ s Newsmax commentary – “ Blacks Must Reject Redefining Civil Rights to License Crime ” – click here .
Project 21 , a leading voice of black conservatives for over 25 years , is sponsored by the National Center for Public Policy Research .
Its members have been quoted , interviewed or published @ @ @ @ @ @ @ created in 1992 .
Contributions to the National Center are tax-deductible and greatly appreciated , and may be earmarked exclusively for the use of Project 21 .
Founded in 1982 , the National Center for Public Policy Research is a non-partisan , free-market , independent conservative think-tank .
Ninety-four percent of its support comes from some 60,000 individuals , less than four percent from foundations and less than two percent from corporations .
Sign up for email updates here .
Follow Project 21 on Twitter at @ Project21News for general announcements .
To @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Project 21 members , follow our media Twitter at @ NCPPRMedia .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

Rosa Parks Strategy Now at the Back of the Civil Rights Bus
By: David Almasi
You may not recognize Ben Crump’s name or face, but there’s no way you will not recognize his handiwork.
A lawyer for the families of Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown and Jacob Blake, Crump is practicing what Project 21 Co-Chairman Horace Cooper calls “a new strategy” for pushing what Crump and his allies consider civil rights progress.
In a Newsmax commentary, Horace laments that this new strategy relies upon “using individuals whose lives and behavior are a wholesale rejection of American culture” and employs “a new and ever-expanding definition of equality and civil rights grievance” that “denies the significant racial progress America has made.”
Why has this happened? Horace suggests race relations in America have gotten to a point where things have become so serene that hyperbole is the only way that those who trade in race can maintain their bases of power:
Perhaps because racism and bigotry have receded so far from the center of the public square that efforts to rally our nation into a race or equality discussion isn’t as easy to initiate and for those who “profit” from this discussion, it certainly wasn’t as lucrative.
And there is a definitive downside, since by-products of this new strategy including worsening race relations and the accusations and flared tempers we now see on a regular basis:
As night follows day, once [Crump] shows up so do the protestors and soon thereafter the looters. Coincidentally, the protests and looting end once a settlement agreement is reached. Lucrative for his law firm, and painful for the rest of America.
While this has benefited Crump and those who subscribe to this new strategy, it’s led to billions of dollars of damage to our cities, devastated businesses (many of them black-owned) and more unjustified deaths than were originally being protested. It’s also being used by the radical left to try to tear down our nation’s cherished institutions that have created a society that was quickly fixing and atoning for the racial disparities of its past.
All of this also does a great disservice to the legacy of civil rights icons such as Rosa Parks, whom Horace notes epitomized the way the civil rights movement successfully sought justice:
[That] model – supporting upstanding members of the community when their rights are violated – proved highly successful and ultimately led to a broad consensus in America for the full implementation of our Founders’ vision of citizen equality before the law. One major additional achievement was that it was an occasion for blacks and whites to work together albeit at great sacrifice – personal and financial.
But those days are over, thanks to people like Crump:
Redefining civil rights to include a license for criminality has taken the noble cause of racial equality down an unfortunate path that must be reversed. Black America must reject the temptation to support this initiative.
Horace advises: “Elites in the media and within the civil rights community would be well served to remember Rosa Parks’s legacy. She was decent and morally upright.”
To read all of Horace’s Newsmax commentary – “Blacks Must Reject Redefining Civil Rights to License Crime” – click here.
••••
To schedule an interview with a member of Project 21, contact Judy Kent at (703) 759-0269.
BLACK LEADERSHIP NETWORK
Project 21, a leading voice of black conservatives for over 25 years, is sponsored by the National Center for Public Policy Research. Its members have been quoted, interviewed or published over 40,000 times since the program was created in 1992. Contributions to the National Center are tax-deductible and greatly appreciated, and may be earmarked exclusively for the use of Project 21. Founded in 1982, the National Center for Public Policy Research is a non-partisan, free-market, independent conservative think-tank. Ninety-four percent of its support comes from some 60,000 individuals, less than four percent from foundations and less than two percent from corporations. Sign up for email updates here. Follow Project 21 on Twitter at @Project21News for general announcements. To be alerted to upcoming media appearances by Project 21 members, follow our media Twitter at @NCPPRMedia.
••••
••••
Read more great articles by David Almasi
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-09-26--German Minister: Lockdown Will Kill More Than Covid-19 Does

German Minister : Lockdown Will Kill More Than Covid-19 Does The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently @ @ @ @ @ @ @ TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the copyright owner .
Disclaimer : The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including , but not limited to , text , graphics , images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction .
Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice , diagnosis or treatment .

German Minister: Lockdown Will Kill More Than Covid-19 Does
“Half a million more will die from tuberculosis”
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-09-26--The Ones Who Walk Away

The Ones Who Walk Away

The Ones Who Walk Away There is a 1973 science fiction or fantasy story , depending upon how you define those terms , by Ursula K. Le Guin titled “ The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas.
” Le Guin got the name for the fictional city of Omelas from a fleeting glance in her rear-view mirror at a road sign as she drove away from Salem , Oregon .
Omelas is a utopian place , whose citizens spend their days and nights seeking pleasure , recreating , or working , if they choose .
Everyone has enough to eat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ toil for it , a true paradise .
However , beneath the city a child is imprisoned in horrible conditions .
It isn ’ t explained why , but the existence of Omelas is dependent on the continuous torture of this child .
Le Guin was obviously setting up the moral quandary which is the spine of the story .
Most citizens of Omelas have accepted the bargain , barely thinking about the shackled child below the streets .
A few , though , are troubled enough by this situation that they can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ones simply walk away from Omelas , turning their backs on all they know .
When the Walk Away movement began , Le Guin ’ s story resonated loudly in my head .
I am not a scholar of Le Guin ’ s work , but from reading her and about her one can glean that she was a feminist and an anarchist .
Her honest , old-fashioned leftism viewed a practical anarchism as an end goal achievable and worth striving for .
I don ’ t agree with , but do feel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anarchists .
After using them as cannon fodder , the socialists pulled a cynical bait-and-switch .
The people who call themselves anarchists today wink at each other , understanding “ anarchist ” as a convenient cloak to hide under and a hammer with which to wreck the hated system ( which at least works ) on the road to a socialist uberstate ( which won ’ t ) .
Would Ursula K. Le Guin , were she still alive , feel welcome on the Left ?
Hard to say .
The mere fact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Walk Away from Omelas ” argues that she would not .
The story demands debate and dissent , which modern leftists appear to abhor .
Step by step over the years the Democrats have retreated farther away from the truth , burrowing deeper into the comforting warmth of their big , beautiful lies .
They pity and scorn those who can ’ t , or even hesitate , to follow them in that deep .
The leftist must hold in contempt those who don ’ t agree with him completely .
Even the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ foundations of his beliefs , which are built not even on sand but on air and arrogance .
The vitriol also serves to keep leftists in line , knowing they will be mercilessly attacked if they break ranks .
And yet , a growing number can no longer manage the moral gymnastics required to be a Democrat today .
Slogans like “ speech is violence and violence is speech ” are not confined to the pages of dystopian novels anymore .
The Democrats bellow them with passion while out for nights of burning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ speak their minds or even just try to eat supper outside a cafe .
Louder than the chants in the streets are the screams of the shackled and tortured child Truth beneath the edifice of the Democratic Party .
Saner Democrats , those not mesmerized by the power they imagine is almost within their grasp , have woken from their slumber to this nightmare .
Reluctantly , they turn their backs on all they know , and walk away .
Have all of those wayward Democrats become Republicans ?
Probably not .
Just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hypocrisy of the Left doesn ’ t mean walkaways are ready to rebrand as conservatives .
At least not yet .
Like the walkaways in the story , they only know that they can ’ t remain where they are .
Americans , underneath it all , are a very practical bunch .
We ’ re willing to try almost anything if it looks like it could work .
But , in the end , the idea does have to work or we will drop it and not look back .
The underlying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people really do get the final say over matters .
We are the ones who will suffer the most from poor decisions .
The people deserting the Democratic Party are simply exercising that option with their feet .
The nub of our problem is that the elites have become unwilling to submit to review by those they serve , the public .
Our masters in Washington know better than us , otherwise they wouldn ’ t be in charge .
Marching in lockstep to the drumbeat of their infallible diktats is our only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mind an incident at the dawn of the Progressive era .
In 1912 , denied the Republican presidential nomination , Theodore Roosevelt walked out of the GOP convention — literally issued the call from the podium and walked out the doors — to find another hall about a mile away and found his own , ill-fated , Bull Moose Party .
That time , Roosevelt only drew away enough Republican votes to elect the Democrat , Woodrow Wilson .
In 2016 , a time less prone to the shenanigans of party bigwigs ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ successfully whisked the GOP away from the establishment .
No wonder the people who used to run the GOP call themselves “ # NeverTrumpers.
” rump stole the whole darn thing right out from under them by simply saying what he ’ d do and then doing what he said .
Honesty from a politician ?
How unfair .
How revolutionary !
The first walkaway , surprisingly enough , was Donald Trump .
He walked away from the Democratic Party some time ago .
Then , he walked away from the Republican Party @ @ @ @ @ @ @ arrogance at the higher levels there .
To everyone ’ s amazement , Trump took the bulk of the party with him .
Like the Chinese Communist Party , who watched the Soviets collapse and fear that fate , the Democrats look upon the reform of the GOP with dread .
The contagion of peasants holding their betters accountable is a death knell for the cult which the Democratic Party has become .
Once an alternative to the two false choices presented before 2016 emerged , voters flocked to it .
Even armed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and a global pandemic , the Democrats can ’ t hope to win a fair election .
Their voters have had enough .
The closing lines of Le Guin ’ s short story read , “ …they seem to know where they are going , the ones who walk away from Omelas .
”

The Ones Who Walk Away
Commentary by: A. Welderson
There is a 1973 science fiction or fantasy story, depending upon how you define those terms, by Ursula K. Le Guin titled “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas.” Le Guin got the name for the fictional city of Omelas from a fleeting glance in her rear-view mirror at a road sign as she drove away from Salem, Oregon. Omelas is a utopian place, whose citizens spend their days and nights seeking pleasure, recreating, or working, if they choose. Everyone has enough to eat and places to sleep without having to toil for it, a true paradise. However, beneath the city a child is imprisoned in horrible conditions. It isn’t explained why, but the existence of Omelas is dependent on the continuous torture of this child. Le Guin was obviously setting up the moral quandary which is the spine of the story.
Most citizens of Omelas have accepted the bargain, barely thinking about the shackled child below the streets. A few, though, are troubled enough by this situation that they cannot. Sooner or later the troubled ones simply walk away from Omelas, turning their backs on all they know. When the Walk Away movement began, Le Guin’s story resonated loudly in my head.
I am not a scholar of Le Guin’s work, but from reading her and about her one can glean that she was a feminist and an anarchist. Her honest, old-fashioned leftism viewed a practical anarchism as an end goal achievable and worth striving for. I don’t agree with, but do feel an empathy for, those bitter old anarchists. After using them as cannon fodder, the socialists pulled a cynical bait-and-switch. The people who call themselves anarchists today wink at each other, understanding “anarchist” as a convenient cloak to hide under and a hammer with which to wreck the hated system (which at least works) on the road to a socialist uberstate (which won’t). Would Ursula K. Le Guin, were she still alive, feel welcome on the Left? Hard to say. The mere fact that she wrote “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” argues that she would not. The story demands debate and dissent, which modern leftists appear to abhor.
Step by step over the years the Democrats have retreated farther away from the truth, burrowing deeper into the comforting warmth of their big, beautiful lies. They pity and scorn those who can’t, or even hesitate, to follow them in that deep. The leftist must hold in contempt those who don’t agree with him completely. Even the slightest doubt creeping in will corrode the foundations of his beliefs, which are built not even on sand but on air and arrogance. The vitriol also serves to keep leftists in line, knowing they will be mercilessly attacked if they break ranks.
And yet, a growing number can no longer manage the moral gymnastics required to be a Democrat today. Slogans like “speech is violence and violence is speech” are not confined to the pages of dystopian novels anymore. The Democrats bellow them with passion while out for nights of burning, looting, and shooting those who speak their minds or even just try to eat supper outside a cafe. Louder than the chants in the streets are the screams of the shackled and tortured child Truth beneath the edifice of the Democratic Party. Saner Democrats, those not mesmerized by the power they imagine is almost within their grasp, have woken from their slumber to this nightmare. Reluctantly, they turn their backs on all they know, and walk away.
Have all of those wayward Democrats become Republicans? Probably not. Just because they can no longer stomach the hypocrisy of the Left doesn’t mean walkaways are ready to rebrand as conservatives. At least not yet. Like the walkaways in the story, they only know that they can’t remain where they are.
Americans, underneath it all, are a very practical bunch. We’re willing to try almost anything if it looks like it could work. But, in the end, the idea does have to work or we will drop it and not look back. The underlying strength of our system is that the people really do get the final say over matters. We are the ones who will suffer the most from poor decisions. The people deserting the Democratic Party are simply exercising that option with their feet.
The nub of our problem is that the elites have become unwilling to submit to review by those they serve, the public. Our masters in Washington know better than us, otherwise they wouldn’t be in charge. Marching in lockstep to the drumbeat of their infallible diktats is our only acceptable action.
The situation calls to mind an incident at the dawn of the Progressive era. In 1912, denied the Republican presidential nomination, Theodore Roosevelt walked out of the GOP convention — literally issued the call from the podium and walked out the doors — to find another hall about a mile away and found his own, ill-fated, Bull Moose Party. That time, Roosevelt only drew away enough Republican votes to elect the Democrat, Woodrow Wilson. In 2016, a time less prone to the shenanigans of party bigwigs (GOP bigwigs anyway), Donald Trump successfully whisked the GOP away from the establishment. No wonder the people who used to run the GOP call themselves “#NeverTrumpers.” rump stole the whole darn thing right out from under them by simply saying what he’d do and then doing what he said. Honesty from a politician? How unfair. How revolutionary!
The first walkaway, surprisingly enough, was Donald Trump. He walked away from the Democratic Party some time ago. Then, he walked away from the Republican Party when he found a similar flavor of arrogance at the higher levels there. To everyone’s amazement, Trump took the bulk of the party with him.
Like the Chinese Communist Party, who watched the Soviets collapse and fear that fate, the Democrats look upon the reform of the GOP with dread. The contagion of peasants holding their betters accountable is a death knell for the cult which the Democratic Party has become. Once an alternative to the two false choices presented before 2016 emerged, voters flocked to it. Even armed with special prosecutors, impeachment, riots, and a global pandemic, the Democrats can’t hope to win a fair election. Their voters have had enough. The closing lines of Le Guin’s short story read, “…they seem to know where they are going, the ones who walk away from Omelas.”
••••
••••
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-09-27--Australia’s Ban on Hydroxychloroquine is Criminal in the Face of the Evidence – MP [VIDEO]

Readers may be interested in this RT story from May 2020 titled Australia reports ‘ surge ’ in illegal hydroxychloroquine imports as people seek alternative treatments for Covid-19 .
Of note : See also this story from March from Business Insider titled Australians are buying hydroxychloroquine after Trump called it a ‘ very powerful ’ treatment for COVID-19 – a claim which remains unproven .
By now , of course , we know this scepticism about hydroxy for treating ‘ covid ’ is unfounded , and that many doctors have come forward to state the efficacy of hydroxy .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Paris Match published this story , titled COVID-19 : a Randomised Chinese Study Proves Dr. Raoult Right .
Of note : So Australia ’ s had the very same prohibition on practicing physicians using hydroxy for their patients and on pharmacists dispensing it , as we ’ ve seen in so many western countries .
Amazing coincidence .
Australian Liberal MP Craig Kelly ( NB .
The Liberal Party in Australia is centre-right ) has come out swinging against the prohibition on prescribing hydroxy on Sky News Australia .
Aussies have no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kudos to Mr. Kelly .
Kelly reveals in the video that the ban on using hydroxy expires in Queensland on October 2 and October 22 for the state of Victoria .
Kelly ’ s big point that Oxford University ’ s Recovery study , which trialed hydroxychloroquine with patients , has been used as the benchmark for policy toward hydroxy use in Australia .
We remind readers of a great piece by Catte Black for Off-guardian we published which reviews ALL THREE hydroxy trials , of which Recovery was one ( Remap and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In all of them , significant overdoses were administered , patients died and the inevitable conclusion drawn was that hydroxy doesn ’ t work .
Which Professor Didier Raoult predicted ahead of such trials .
See “ Covid-19 Has Turned Public Health into a Patient-Killing Experiment ” .
INFO WARNING : In Australia , the prohibition of hydroxychloroquine is criminal Craig Kelly , Member of the Australian Parliament was on SkyNews , one of Australia ’ s leading television channels on Sunday , September 27 , 2020 .
He is a member of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Commission .
He said , “ the Australian administration ’ s ban on the treatment of Covid-19 with hydroxychloroquine violates the Hippocratic oath taken by doctors and is based on an erroneous study.
” Kelly said health bureaucrats have interfered with the doctor-patient relationship by prohibiting the use of hydroxychloroquine even though the doctor thought the treatment would save the patient ’ s life .
“ Health bureaucrats have violated the very first principle of the Hippocratic Oath , which is to do no harm ” ( primum non nocere ) , he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only prohibit the use of hydroxychloroquine if the evidence shows beyond a reasonable doubt that hydroxychloroquine does not work and is dangerous .
“ Recent studies show that this proposal is no longer viable … and they must lift their bans , otherwise they are involved in crimes against humanity and should be brought to criminal justice in The Hague , ” he said .
“ They refuse to give medical treatment to Australians when the evidence shows it can save lives.
” Mr. Kelly also said that the National Clinical Evidence Working @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decision to ban hydroxychloroquine , relied on the results of the Recovery study conducted at Oxford University .
He argued that the study ultimately gave patients “ twice the dose of what they know is an overdose ” and that the study director stated that the doses were based on the indication of “ amoebic dysentery ” .
Sky News host Rowan Dean said the lead investigator of the study made it clear that “ amoebic dysentery is what they based their doses on , but we know that hydroxychloroquine is never used @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the end , the study was flawed , ” he said .
“ The newspaper France Soir itself says that the Recovery study can not be considered serious .
And yet it is the study on which all Australian medical boards have relied , the vast majority of their decisions and evidence come from the Recovery study ” .
FranceSoir has denounced the Recovery study since June 5 , 2020 .
This study is also used as a basis for our decision-making bodies in the context of prophylactic treatment against Covid 19 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ an audit of the results of this study so that the health sovereignty of the French people can be based on an independent expertise by totally independent third parties .
Will we finally see the language disentangled at the National Assembly , or within the learned societies ?
See the full video of Craig Kelly ’ s interview here .
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

Pam Barker | Director of TLB Europe Reloaded Project
Readers may be interested in this RT story from May 2020 titled Australia reports ‘surge’ in illegal hydroxychloroquine imports as people seek alternative treatments for Covid-19. Of note:
CANBERRA, May 8, 2020, RT. Australian authorities have reported a spike in drug smuggling – but not the kind they usually deal with. Aussies are importing hydroxychloroquine, an anti-malarial medication used as a controversial antidote to Covid-19. Dozens of packages containing more than 6,000 tablets have been intercepted since January, the Australian Border Force (ABF) announced in a press release on Friday, Russia Today reported.
See also this story from March from Business Insider titled Australians are buying hydroxychloroquine after Trump called it a ‘very powerful’ treatment for COVID-19 – a claim which remains unproven.
By now, of course, we know this scepticism about hydroxy for treating ‘covid’ is unfounded, and that many doctors have come forward to state the efficacy of hydroxy. In fact, at the end of March, Paris Match published this story, titled COVID-19: a Randomised Chinese Study Proves Dr. Raoult Right. Of note:
This study, a priori more in line with what the drug agencies consider to be reliable, validates the conclusions of the Marseilles infectiologist on chloroquine and the interest of using it early in the infection instead of late.
So Australia’s had the very same prohibition on practicing physicians using hydroxy for their patients and on pharmacists dispensing it, as we’ve seen in so many western countries. Amazing coincidence.
Australian Liberal MP Craig Kelly (NB. The Liberal Party in Australia is centre-right) has come out swinging against the prohibition on prescribing hydroxy on Sky News Australia. Aussies have no fear telling it like it is. Kudos to Mr. Kelly.
Kelly reveals in the video that the ban on using hydroxy expires in Queensland on October 2 and October 22 for the state of Victoria.
Kelly’s big point that Oxford University’s Recovery study, which trialed hydroxychloroquine with patients, has been used as the benchmark for policy toward hydroxy use in Australia. We remind readers of a great piece by Catte Black for Off-guardian we published which reviews ALL THREE hydroxy trials, of which Recovery was one (Remap and Solidarity were the other two). In all of them, significant overdoses were administered, patients died and the inevitable conclusion drawn was that hydroxy doesn’t work. Which Professor Didier Raoult predicted ahead of such trials.
************
INFO WARNING: In Australia, the prohibition of hydroxychloroquine is criminal
FRANCE SOIR
Craig Kelly, Member of the Australian Parliament was on SkyNews, one of Australia’s leading television channels on Sunday, September 27, 2020. He is a member of the Liberal Group and the Covid-19 Inquiry Commission.
He said, “the Australian administration’s ban on the treatment of Covid-19 with hydroxychloroquine violates the Hippocratic oath taken by doctors and is based on an erroneous study.”
Kelly said health bureaucrats have interfered with the doctor-patient relationship by prohibiting the use of hydroxychloroquine even though the doctor thought the treatment would save the patient’s life.
“Health bureaucrats have violated the very first principle of the Hippocratic Oath, which is to do no harm” (primum non nocere), he said.
Furthermore, the administration should only prohibit the use of hydroxychloroquine if the evidence shows beyond a reasonable doubt that hydroxychloroquine does not work and is dangerous.
“Recent studies show that this proposal is no longer viable … and they must lift their bans, otherwise they are involved in crimes against humanity and should be brought to criminal justice in The Hague,” he said.
“They refuse to give medical treatment to Australians when the evidence shows it can save lives.” Mr. Kelly also said that the National Clinical Evidence Working Group COVID-19, which made the authoritative decision to ban hydroxychloroquine, relied on the results of the Recovery study conducted at Oxford University.
He argued that the study ultimately gave patients “twice the dose of what they know is an overdose” and that the study director stated that the doses were based on the indication of “amoebic dysentery”.
Sky News host Rowan Dean said the lead investigator of the study made it clear that “amoebic dysentery is what they based their doses on, but we know that hydroxychloroquine is never used for amoebic dysentery”.
“In the end, the study was flawed,” he said. “The newspaper France Soir itself says that the Recovery study cannot be considered serious. And yet it is the study on which all Australian medical boards have relied, the vast majority of their decisions and evidence come from the Recovery study”.
FranceSoir has denounced the Recovery study since June 5, 2020. This study is also used as a basis for our decision-making bodies in the context of prophylactic treatment against Covid 19. Since then we have been asking for an audit of the results of this study so that the health sovereignty of the French people can be based on an independent expertise by totally independent third parties.
Will we finally see the language disentangled at the National Assembly, or within the learned societies?
See the full video of Craig Kelly’s interview here.
************
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
Pam
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-09-27--Who or what is driving the Prime Muppet?

The article featured below is a well written piece from Middle East Eye , which we recommend for more interesting articles .
We are featuring it because it addresses the subject of “ what the heck is going on with Boris Johnson ?
” whose premiership is rapidly descending into farce and who may well go down in history as he most disastrous PM the country has ever had .
In our view , the article alludes to at least some of the answers , although we doubt whether it is complete in explaining how Johnson came to be the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a coup hiding behind the smoke screen of a fake pandemic .
His government ’ s promotion and presentation of the supposed epidemic is so riddled with obvious falsehoods , misrepresentations and illogical nonsense and its “ handling ” so destructive of the country , we have reached a point where support for the gang of venal nation wreckers masquerading as our government is evaporating fast .
It has reached the point where only the most venal of the MSM or servile of the citizenry remain on board with the fakery and deception @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but a team of equally inept players – the dishonest , manipulative Health Secretary Hancock being a case in point .
And it does not apparently stop at their handling of the COVID19 psyop but extends to other issues of national governance as the article alludes .
The Prime Muppet ’ s worrying behaviour also predates COVID .
It embraces his bypassing of Parliamentary Democracy over Brexit and his bizarre anti-Russian warmongering when Foreign Secretary as well as his flouting of international law .
Having left the EU , the nation ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ steady hands at the tiller as we rediscover self governance .
Give that wise and steady hand there is no reason we can not make a success of our independence but that is not what we have .
We find ourselves managed at the worst possible time – perhaps calculatedly so – by a faction that is in essence a subversive enemy of the nation infiltrated into the highest echelons of our governance from whence it can inflict the most damage without war ever having to be declared .
For sure , these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lie whoever or whatever has steered then into such catastrophic and mendacious stewardship of the nation .
Who or what are those influences , the master criminals working the strings of men unfit to run a parish council let alone an entire nation ?
We do not yet know for sure .
The current crew of stooges will not last .
My prediction is that Johnson at least will be gone by Christmas but we simply MUST be alert to the fact that whatever replacements are manoeuvred into position , while the puppet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ internal sabotage will continue .
This would be a shame because we have the potential to build something quite special on these islands , given the national management of honest men who are not working against us in the guise of help .
Boris Johnson ’ s premiership is a calamity for Britain – and he knows it Twenty years ago , Boris Johnson hired me as political correspondent at the Spectator magazine .
He was a joy to work for , a fine editor and a loyal colleague with the quickest mind @ @ @ @ @ @ @ last few months I have found myself trying to reconcile the exhilarating and generous individual I knew so well back then with today ’ s prime minister of Britain .
A prime minister who shamelessly lies to parliament , who misled the Queen over the prorogation of parliament , who wages permanent war on the independent civil service and who turned his back on Britain ’ s international obligations by pledging to tear up his own Withdrawal Agreement with the EU .
It ’ s impossible to equate the editor of the Spectator @ @ @ @ @ @ @ British PM .
It ’ s as if we are talking about two different people .
Johnson of the Spectator stood up for the rule of law , for British institutions , for the union , for the international order and for the honest politics which as prime minister he daily subverts .
Back then he had a sophisticated understanding of policy – one which disdained simple solutions .
We would have lucid discussions of complex issues , either in weekly conferences or at the famous Spectator lunches .
Boris was sunny , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how did Johnson of the Spectator turn into the man who trashes Britain ’ s reputation by ripping up international agreements ?
I acknowledge Middle Eastern readers will have allowed themselves a hollow laugh by this stage , given Britain ’ s record in the region .
The betrayal of the Arabs after World War One .
The invasion of Iraq .
The abuse of the UN Security Council resolution in Libya .
The extraordinary rendition and torture .
A blind eye to Israel ’ s violations of international law and being complicit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Never before has there been a situation where a cabinet minister has flagrantly stated on the floor of the House of Commons that he knew a course of action was unlawful , but that he was going ahead to do it anyway .
This new policy of flagrantly breaking the law shatters our reputation .
Why would any country ever sign a document with Britain again ?
Only yesterday Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab was lecturing Iran that it must abide by international law and “ comply with its nuclear commitments & preserve the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hypocrisy from the British foreign secretary .
And immediately picked up by French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian , who took aside the wretched Raab to inform him that the UK ’ s proposed breaching of the Withdrawal Agreement was “ unacceptable ” .
Earlier this year , Britain condemned Iran ’ s detention of the British ambassador in Tehran on the basis of international law .
We used international law to condemn Russia ’ s annexation of the Crimea , and the attacks on civilians in Syria ’ s Idlib .
Yet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has gone ahead and deliberately trashed Britain ’ s reputation around the world .
Why ?
What follows is no more than informed speculation .
No one can look into the soul of another human being and be sure about motive .
But here is my own attempt at reconciling the inspirational editor I worked for two decades ago with the dishonest lawbreaker in 10 Downing Street today .
Early last year Johnson entered into a bargain with Michael Gove and Dominic Cummings , formerly the organisers of the Vote Leave campaign .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , enabling him to realise his ambition to become prime minister .
In return Johnson would abandon the traditional Conservatism he supported at the Spectator .
Cummings was installed in Downing Street as a “ senior adviser ” while Gove would run the government .
I explained some of the elements of this arrangement in a Middle East Eye column in July .
Deep down , this Faustian pact makes Johnson miserable .
Look at his recent photographs , and you can see the deep unhappiness in his eyes , which in recent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of private panic .
His government is a national disaster but , remember , it ’ s also a private tragedy for Johnson .
Johnson is scared .
He ’ s destroying Britain .
He knows it .
As a highly intelligent man he will sense that history will damn him as one of Britain ’ s worst prime ministers .
It ’ s not just Brexit .
The Covid-19 crisis is worse , with his government sending out chaotic messages and overseeing the worst death toll in Europe .
In the words @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the prime minister ’ s biggest backers , “ the government ’ s approach seems bewilderingly confused .
Stay at home .
Go back to work .
Stay alert .
Don ’ t mix with more than six people .
Eat out to help out.
” Johnson won ’ t last .
He may go of his own accord , though Gove and Cummings will fight to keep him .
That ’ s understandable .
He ’ s their tool and their only route to power , so he serves their purposes .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ act to remove him , as it has done before with leaders far better than Johnson .
One way or another he will go .
Times are far too serious now for Johnson ’ s trademark brand of cheery rascality and empty ebullience .
Fear , anxiety , and actual suffering are much more widespread , while economic disaster and national disintegration loom .
The nation will want a sober leader at this grave and terrible time .
this article was first published on UK Reloaded

Introduction
The article featured below is a well written piece from Middle East Eye, which we recommend for more interesting articles.
We are featuring it because it addresses the subject of “what the heck is going on with Boris Johnson?” whose premiership is rapidly descending into farce and who may well go down in history as he most disastrous PM the country has ever had.
In our view, the article alludes to at least some of the answers, although we doubt whether it is complete in explaining how Johnson came to be the front man for what has amounted to a coup hiding behind the smoke screen of a fake pandemic.
His government’s promotion and presentation of the supposed epidemic is so riddled with obvious falsehoods, misrepresentations and illogical nonsense and its “handling” so destructive of the country, we have reached a point where support for the gang of venal nation wreckers masquerading as our government is evaporating fast. It has reached the point where only the most venal of the MSM or servile of the citizenry remain on board with the fakery and deception.
The madness embraces not just Johnson but a team of equally inept players – the dishonest, manipulative Health Secretary Hancock being a case in point. And it does not apparently stop at their handling of the COVID19 psyop but extends to other issues of national governance as the article alludes.
The Prime Muppet’s worrying behaviour also predates COVID. It embraces his bypassing of Parliamentary Democracy over Brexit and his bizarre anti-Russian warmongering when Foreign Secretary as well as his flouting of international law.
Having left the EU, the nation’s fortunes depend upon it having wise and steady hands at the tiller as we rediscover self governance. Give that wise and steady hand there is no reason we cannot make a success of our independence but that is not what we have. We find ourselves managed at the worst possible time – perhaps calculatedly so – by a faction that is in essence a subversive enemy of the nation infiltrated into the highest echelons of our governance from whence it can inflict the most damage without war ever having to be declared.
For sure, these men are the stooges and behind them lie whoever or whatever has steered then into such catastrophic and mendacious stewardship of the nation.
Who or what are those influences, the master criminals working the strings of men unfit to run a parish council let alone an entire nation?
We do not yet know for sure.
The current crew of stooges will not last. My prediction is that Johnson at least will be gone by Christmas but we simply MUST be alert to the fact that whatever replacements are manoeuvred into position, while the puppet masters remain undiscovered and un-removed, the internal sabotage will continue.
This would be a shame because we have the potential to build something quite special on these islands, given the national management of honest men who are not working against us in the guise of help.
Boris Johnson’s premiership is a calamity for Britain – and he knows it
by Peter Oborne
Twenty years ago, Boris Johnson hired me as political correspondent at the Spectator magazine. He was a joy to work for, a fine editor and a loyal colleague with the quickest mind I had ever encountered.
Over the last few months I have found myself trying to reconcile the exhilarating and generous individual I knew so well back then with today’s prime minister of Britain.
A prime minister who shamelessly lies to parliament, who misled the Queen over the prorogation of parliament, who wages permanent war on the independent civil service and who turned his back on Britain’s international obligations by pledging to tear up his own Withdrawal Agreement with the EU.
Two Johnsons
It’s impossible to equate the editor of the Spectator 20 years ago and today’s British PM.
How did Johnson of the Spectator turn into the man who trashes Britain’s reputation by ripping up international agreements?
It’s as if we are talking about two different people. Johnson of the Spectator stood up for the rule of law, for British institutions, for the union, for the international order and for the honest politics which as prime minister he daily subverts.
Back then he had a sophisticated understanding of policy – one which disdained simple solutions. We would have lucid discussions of complex issues, either in weekly conferences or at the famous Spectator lunches.
Boris was sunny, liberal, optimistic and pragmatic. So how did Johnson of the Spectator turn into the man who trashes Britain’s reputation by ripping up international agreements?
I acknowledge Middle Eastern readers will have allowed themselves a hollow laugh by this stage, given Britain’s record in the region. The betrayal of the Arabs after World War One. The invasion of Iraq. The abuse of the UN Security Council resolution in Libya. The extraordinary rendition and torture. A blind eye to Israel’s violations of international law and being complicit in Saudi war crimes in Yemen.
British statecraft
Never before has there been a situation where a cabinet minister has flagrantly stated on the floor of the House of Commons that he knew a course of action was unlawful, but that he was going ahead to do it anyway.
Brandon Lewis, the Northern Ireland secretary, did just that this week when he confirmed that a new bill to override the Brexit withdrawal agreement “does break international law in a specific and limited way”. Even former prime minister Tony Blair had to produce a statement from his attorney general pretending that invading Iraq was legal.
This new policy of flagrantly breaking the law shatters our reputation. Why would any country ever sign a document with Britain again? Only yesterday Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab was lecturing Iran that it must abide by international law and “comply with its nuclear commitments & preserve the JCPOA”. Farcical.
What stinking hypocrisy from the British foreign secretary. And immediately picked up by French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, who took aside the wretched Raab to inform him that the UK’s proposed breaching of the Withdrawal Agreement was “unacceptable”.
Earlier this year, Britain condemned Iran’s detention of the British ambassador in Tehran on the basis of international law. We used international law to condemn Russia’s annexation of the Crimea, and the attacks on civilians in Syria’s Idlib. Yet Boris Johnson, an intelligent man, has gone ahead and deliberately trashed Britain’s reputation around the world. Why?
What follows is no more than informed speculation. No one can look into the soul of another human being and be sure about motive. But here is my own attempt at reconciling the inspirational editor I worked for two decades ago with the dishonest lawbreaker in 10 Downing Street today.
Who runs Britain?
Early last year Johnson entered into a bargain with Michael Gove and Dominic Cummings, formerly the organisers of the Vote Leave campaign. They would propel him to Downing Street, enabling him to realise his ambition to become prime minister.
In return Johnson would abandon the traditional Conservatism he supported at the Spectator. Cummings was installed in Downing Street as a “senior adviser” while Gove would run the government. I explained some of the elements of this arrangement in a Middle East Eye column in July.
Deep down, this Faustian pact makes Johnson miserable. Look at his recent photographs, and you can see the deep unhappiness in his eyes, which in recent weeks are starting to tell a story of private panic.
His government is a national disaster but, remember, it’s also a private tragedy for Johnson.
The reckoning
Johnson is scared. He’s destroying Britain. He knows it. As a highly intelligent man he will sense that history will damn him as one of Britain’s worst prime ministers. It’s not just Brexit. The Covid-19 crisis is worse, with his government sending out chaotic messages and overseeing the worst death toll in Europe.
In the words of the Daily Mail, one of the prime minister’s biggest backers, “the government’s approach seems bewilderingly confused. Stay at home. Go back to work. Stay alert. Don’t mix with more than six people. Eat out to help out.”
The Conservative Party may in due course act to remove Johnson, as it has done before with leaders far better than him
Johnson won’t last. He may go of his own accord, though Gove and Cummings will fight to keep him. That’s understandable. He’s their tool and their only route to power, so he serves their purposes.
The Conservative Party may in due course act to remove him, as it has done before with leaders far better than Johnson. One way or another he will go. Times are far too serious now for Johnson’s trademark brand of cheery rascality and empty ebullience.
Fear, anxiety, and actual suffering are much more widespread, while economic disaster and national disintegration loom. The nation will want a sober leader at this grave and terrible time.
this article was first published on UK Reloaded
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-09-27--No Time to Loose, Bring Free Speech Back Now

The war between conservatives and Silicon Valley is on .
The scions of social media are no longer hiding their disdain for an entire movement .
They know the outcome of this high-stakes presidential election could jeopardize their rule over the American people and unmake the oligarchy they ’ ve built with the rest of the ruling class .
If we are to save the republic , we must realize this too—and act .
Tens of millions of individual users who dare question leftist orthodoxy are being targeted and silenced by Big Tech .
There are no limits on who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the United States .
That ’ s why the Media Research Center is fighting back with the Free Speech Alliance , which includes over 70 groups and The Claremont Institute .
We also just released our database effort to document the bias at CensorTrack.org .
One key weapon being deployed to punish conservatives is the so-called “ fact check.
” It ’ s being used to censor thousands of conservatives communicating with millions of followers .
It ’ s happened tens of thousands of times , and it ’ s getting worse .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Facebook , with 2.7 billion users , is dramatically skewed to the left in its fact-checking operation .
It now has an international “ Oversight Committee ” dominated by George Soros-funded entities that make a mockery of unbiased review .
Citizens wanting to rally in support of reopening the country have been banned because some public gatherings in some states are forbidden .
Antifa , however , thrives largely unchecked and unchallenged as it riots in the streets and harasses members of Congress in their homes .
Conservatives have made good-faith attempts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to no avail .
Covid-19 has sent social media sites into censorship overdrive .
If you disagree with the social media prescription for the virus , you are silenced .
Ask the president , or his son , or countless doctors .
Social media censorship is the most direct threat to free speech worldwide coming from the most powerful companies in the history of man .
As a consequence , some conservatives are actively supporting the effort to strip from these social media giants the Section 230 protections that they certainly have abused @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal , these social media giants need to be held legally accountable for content on their own sites .
But 230 protects companies from lawsuits when publishing the content of others .
This has given Big Tech firms like Facebook the power to block conservatives from the public conversation while encouraging hate-filled , dishonest speech toward conservatives—all with virtual impunity .
U.S .
Senators Roger Wicker ( R. , MI ) , Lindsey Graham ( R. , SC ) , and Marsha Blackburn ( R. , TN @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clarify the original intent of the law and increase accountability for content moderation practices.
” Others , including 51 state attorneys general , are exploring antitrust remedies to break the monopolies and allow competition that might embrace free speech .
These are very encouraging steps in the right direction .
But there might be an easier solution to resolve at least part of the problem : let ’ s fix fact-checking .
Silicon Valley , its allies in the “ old ” media , and the academy are the ones clamoring for fact-checking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s no market demand for any corporate fact-checking .
None .
This is not to suggest that social media sites shouldn ’ t be monitored , and restrictions placed on them .
But those restrictions should be imposed only where absolutely necessary and legally required in cases of criminal activity , terrorism , and pornography .
That should be the full extent of Big Tech ’ s direct involvement in the fact-checking process .
Let the public make the call : allow them to opt in to fact-checking .
• Create a Social @ @ @ @ @ @ @ produce a simple document outlining what can and will be banned by the social media community .
Every company will be asked to sign the charter .
• Demand Equal Fact-Checkers : Each social media company would recruit a set number of official fact-checkers—say , ten .
These fact-checkers would run the political gamut and share in valuing true diversity of thought .
For every leftist enterprise there would be a conservative alternative .
Any existing “ fact-checking ” operations would need to disclose their true bias .
Pure objectivity does not exist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact-checking organization would be required to fill out a Transparency Statement , to include the organization ’ s official mission statement and describe all other organizational activities , political affiliations , sources of major funding and the qualifications of all staff participating in their operation .
• Pay Fact-Checkers : As cable companies do with C-SPAN , so too would the social media giants fund these fact-checking organizations as a public service .
Fact-checkers would be paid their salaries a year in advance , just as ombudsmen are , to mitigate against any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Social media companies would prominently list the names of all fact-checkers and encourage their audiences to read them .
• Track Actions : Social media companies would agree to maintain a public log of all disciplinary action taken by the companies against users , be they personal or corporate .
• Impose Biannual Oversight : A blue-ribbon “ Oversight Board ” would be convened biannually to review these fact-checkers .
If the Oversight Board determined a fact-checker ’ s record to be unacceptable , it could terminate the contract while recruiting a similar @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wouldn ’ t be used to shut down , suspend , or in any other way discipline users or organizations .
They would be attached to stories for the users who opted in .
They would provide additional information , not censor by dictate .
This will naturally require tweaking , but the outline ought to provide satisfaction for all parties .
Social media sites will become self-policing communities ; freedom of speech will be guaranteed , warts and all ; conservatives will have the assurance they are no longer being targeted for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or legislative action against these social media giants will be minimized , if not negated altogether .
In other words , one piece of the debate just might be resolved by the private sector , for the private sector .
And maybe liberals will get back to defending free speech , as they once did .
( TLB ) published this article posted by Tyler Durden and written by L.Brent Bozell III via The American Mind with our appreciation for this perspective .

A fact-check solution to a constitutional crisis…
The war between conservatives and Silicon Valley is on. The scions of social media are no longer hiding their disdain for an entire movement. They know the outcome of this high-stakes presidential election could jeopardize their rule over the American people and unmake the oligarchy they’ve built with the rest of the ruling class. If we are to save the republic, we must realize this too—and act.
Tens of millions of individual users who dare question leftist orthodoxy are being targeted and silenced by Big Tech. There are no limits on who they censor, including the President of the United States.
That’s why the Media Research Center is fighting back with the Free Speech Alliance, which includes over 70 groups and The Claremont Institute. We also just released our database effort to document the bias at CensorTrack.org.
One key weapon being deployed to punish conservatives is the so-called “fact check.” It’s being used to censor thousands of conservatives communicating with millions of followers. It’s happened tens of thousands of times, and it’s getting worse. Facebook is one of the worst offenders.
Facebook, with 2.7 billion users, is dramatically skewed to the left in its fact-checking operation. It now has an international “Oversight Committee” dominated by George Soros-funded entities that make a mockery of unbiased review. Citizens wanting to rally in support of reopening the country have been banned because some public gatherings in some states are forbidden. Antifa, however, thrives largely unchecked and unchallenged as it riots in the streets and harasses members of Congress in their homes.
Conservatives have made good-faith attempts to resolve these many conflicts, but to no avail.
Covid-19 has sent social media sites into censorship overdrive. If you disagree with the social media prescription for the virus, you are silenced. Ask the president, or his son, or countless doctors.
Social media censorship is the most direct threat to free speech worldwide coming from the most powerful companies in the history of man. As a consequence, some conservatives are actively supporting the effort to strip from these social media giants the Section 230 protections that they certainly have abused.
Just like newspapers such as The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal, these social media giants need to be held legally accountable for content on their own sites. But 230 protects companies from lawsuits when publishing the content of others. This has given Big Tech firms like Facebook the power to block conservatives from the public conversation while encouraging hate-filled, dishonest speech toward conservatives—all with virtual impunity.
Taking Action
U.S. Senators Roger Wicker (R., MI), Lindsey Graham (R., SC), and Marsha Blackburn (R., TN) have proposed legislation that “would clarify the original intent of the law and increase accountability for content moderation practices.”
Others, including 51 state attorneys general, are exploring antitrust remedies to break the monopolies and allow competition that might embrace free speech.
These are very encouraging steps in the right direction.
But there might be an easier solution to resolve at least part of the problem: let’s fix fact-checking.
Silicon Valley, its allies in the “old” media, and the academy are the ones clamoring for fact-checking, not the public.
There’s no market demand for any corporate fact-checking. None.
This is not to suggest that social media sites shouldn’t be monitored, and restrictions placed on them. But those restrictions should be imposed only where absolutely necessary and legally required in cases of criminal activity, terrorism, and pornography.
That should be the full extent of Big Tech’s direct involvement in the fact-checking process.
Let the public make the call: allow them to opt in to fact-checking.
We offer a simple framework.
Create a Social Media Charter: A task force would produce a simple document outlining what can and will be banned by the social media community. Every company will be asked to sign the charter. Demand Equal Fact-Checkers: Each social media company would recruit a set number of official fact-checkers—say, ten. These fact-checkers would run the political gamut and share in valuing true diversity of thought. For every leftist enterprise there would be a conservative alternative. Any existing “fact-checking” operations would need to disclose their true bias. Pure objectivity does not exist. Insist on Transparency: Each fact-checking organization would be required to fill out a Transparency Statement, to include the organization’s official mission statement and describe all other organizational activities, political affiliations, sources of major funding and the qualifications of all staff participating in their operation. Pay Fact-Checkers: As cable companies do with C-SPAN, so too would the social media giants fund these fact-checking organizations as a public service. Fact-checkers would be paid their salaries a year in advance, just as ombudsmen are, to mitigate against any possible interference. Publicize Options: Social media companies would prominently list the names of all fact-checkers and encourage their audiences to read them. Track Actions: Social media companies would agree to maintain a public log of all disciplinary action taken by the companies against users, be they personal or corporate. Impose Biannual Oversight: A blue-ribbon “Oversight Board” would be convened biannually to review these fact-checkers. If the Oversight Board determined a fact-checker’s record to be unacceptable, it could terminate the contract while recruiting a similar replacement. Limit Fact-checks: Fact-checks wouldn’t be used to shut down, suspend, or in any other way discipline users or organizations. They would be attached to stories for the users who opted in. They would provide additional information, not censor by dictate.
This will naturally require tweaking, but the outline ought to provide satisfaction for all parties. Social media sites will become self-policing communities; freedom of speech will be guaranteed, warts and all; conservatives will have the assurance they are no longer being targeted for censorship; and the reasons for legal or legislative action against these social media giants will be minimized, if not negated altogether.
In other words, one piece of the debate just might be resolved by the private sector, for the private sector. And maybe liberals will get back to defending free speech, as they once did.
*********
(TLB) published this article posted by Tyler Durden and written by L.Brent Bozell III via The American Mind with our appreciation for this perspective.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …


thelibertybeacon--2020-09-27--Critical Race Theory Chaos Would Make Castro Smile

Asked about rioting in cities and the leftist narrative that “ systemic racism ” runs through American society , Project 21 member Vince Ellison called this a tactic of “ Marxism 101.
” During an interview on Newsmax TV ’ s “ National Report , ” Vince discussed the damage that critical race theory has caused , and said that “ Che Guevara [ and ] Fidel Castro would be smiling at this type of manipulation and mind control ” being used against the American people .
The Trump Administration recently moved to ban the use of critical race theory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ racial theory an “ anathema to freedom.
” Detailing the problems of critical race theory and how it attacks American exceptionalism , Vince said about the secret to success : It has nothing to do with the color of your skin .
It has more to do with how hard you ’ re willing to work .
Whether you ’ re going to get yourself a good job .
Whether you ’ re going to be a good Christian , Muslim or Jew .
And whether or not you ’ re going to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ man and a gun for the fool .
And walk proudly and strongly in the country of your birth .
And be satisfied and content and happy .
Critical race theory says this is not possible for black men in America – that they have to depend on the forbearance of racists and that they have to ask them for respite .
And that we can not conduct and live… properly in the country of our birth lest we are given permission from white society .
Vince added that promoting unrest by blaming @ @ @ @ @ @ @ used to cover up for the failure of liberal policies in urban areas where black Americans live in greater numbers .
Poor government-run schools , religious intolerance , anti-gun laws and policies that break up stable families – policies typically instituted by liberal lawmakers – are more of a threat to black Americans than any conspiracy theories being promoted by critical race theory trainers .
Regarding the focus on police violence , he remarked : And they take this violence – and this canard that we are going to be shot by police @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all of these riots and all this burning and all this looting… [ T ] he left has taken this canard , and they ’ ve convinced us that this is our biggest problem in the black community right now .
Instead , this is part of a strategy that ’ s been used “ all over the world ” to “ take over America , ” Vince said .
This rioting , he warned , is “ a precursor for them taking over.
” Black Lives Matter and Antifa activists , he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Project 21 applauded the Trump Administration for pushing back against critical race theory and for beginning the process of cancelling all contracts promoting it in federal training .
Project 21 , a leading voice of black conservatives for over 25 years , is sponsored by the National Center for Public Policy Research .
Its members have been quoted , interviewed or published over 40,000 times since the program was created in 1992 .
Contributions to the National Center are tax-deductible and greatly appreciated , and may be earmarked exclusively for the use @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the National Center for Public Policy Research is a non-partisan , free-market , independent conservative think-tank .
Ninety-four percent of its support comes from some 60,000 individuals , less than four percent from foundations and less than two percent from corporations .
Sign up for email updates here .
Follow Project 21 on Twitter at @ Project21News for general announcements .
To be alerted to upcoming media appearances by Project 21 members , follow our media Twitter at @ NCPPRMedia .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential @ @ @ @ @ @ @ grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ owner .

Critical Race Theory Chaos Would Make Castro Smile
By: David Almasi
Asked about rioting in cities and the leftist narrative that “systemic racism” runs through American society, Project 21 member Vince Ellison called this a tactic of “Marxism 101.”
During an interview on Newsmax TV’s “National Report,” Vince discussed the damage that critical race theory has caused, and said that “Che Guevara [and] Fidel Castro would be smiling at this type of manipulation and mind control” being used against the American people.
The Trump Administration recently moved to ban the use of critical race theory in federal offices. Vince called this racial theory an “anathema to freedom.”
Detailing the problems of critical race theory and how it attacks American exceptionalism, Vince said about the secret to success:
It has nothing to do with the color of your skin. It has more to do with how hard you’re willing to work. Whether you’re going to get yourself a good job. Whether you’re going to be a good Christian, Muslim or Jew. And whether or not you’re going to arm yourself with knowledge for the wise man and a gun for the fool. And walk proudly and strongly in the country of your birth. And be satisfied and content and happy. Critical race theory says this is not possible for black men in America – that they have to depend on the forbearance of racists and that they have to ask them for respite. And that we cannot conduct and live… properly in the country of our birth lest we are given permission from white society. And that’s ridiculous.
Vince added that promoting unrest by blaming it on allegedly inherent racial disparities is used to cover up for the failure of liberal policies in urban areas where black Americans live in greater numbers. Poor government-run schools, religious intolerance, anti-gun laws and policies that break up stable families – policies typically instituted by liberal lawmakers – are more of a threat to black Americans than any conspiracy theories being promoted by critical race theory trainers.
“It’s a deflection,” Vince noted.
Regarding the focus on police violence, he remarked:
And they take this violence – and this canard that we are going to be shot by police – and they use this to cause all of these riots and all this burning and all this looting… [T]he left has taken this canard, and they’ve convinced us that this is our biggest problem in the black community right now.
Instead, this is part of a strategy that’s been used “all over the world” to “take over America,” Vince said. This rioting, he warned, is “a precursor for them taking over.” Black Lives Matter and Antifa activists, he noted, are key to this strategy.
Project 21 applauded the Trump Administration for pushing back against critical race theory and for beginning the process of cancelling all contracts promoting it in federal training.
••••
To schedule an interview with a member of Project 21, contact Judy Kent at (703) 759-0269.
BLACK LEADERSHIP NETWORK
Project 21, a leading voice of black conservatives for over 25 years, is sponsored by the National Center for Public Policy Research. Its members have been quoted, interviewed or published over 40,000 times since the program was created in 1992. Contributions to the National Center are tax-deductible and greatly appreciated, and may be earmarked exclusively for the use of Project 21. Founded in 1982, the National Center for Public Policy Research is a non-partisan, free-market, independent conservative think-tank. Ninety-four percent of its support comes from some 60,000 individuals, less than four percent from foundations and less than two percent from corporations. Sign up for email updates here. Follow Project 21 on Twitter at @Project21News for general announcements. To be alerted to upcoming media appearances by Project 21 members, follow our media Twitter at @NCPPRMedia.
••••
••••
Read more great articles by David Almasi
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.