thelibertybeacon--2020-12-12--Janice Dean slams Gov. Cuomo over decision to end indoor dining in NYC

Janice Dean slams Gov .
Cuomo over decision to end indoor dining : ‘ donate all of the proceeds ’ from your book to ‘ restaurants you ’ re closing ’ New York Gov .
Andrew Cuomo ( D ) announced Friday that indoor dining in New York City will be terminated again as COVID-19 cases in the city ’ s five boroughs and the rest of the state continue to skyrocket , as well as across the whole United States .
In response to Gov .
Cuomo ’ s order , Fox News ’ Janice Dean , who has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ York leader ’ s handling of the virus suggested he “ donate all of the proceeds including the huge advance from your fictional ‘ leadership ’ book to all the restaurants you ’ re closing.
” Dean has fought tirelessly to expose Gov .
Cuomo ’ s order at the start of COVID-19 that forced nursing homes to take in recovering patients with the virus .
She lost loved ones as a result of that very order .
Because New York City ’ s number of coronavirus cases and hospitalizations have increased drastically @ @ @ @ @ @ @ three-term governor stated during a virtual press conference that “ [ w ] e ’ re going to close indoor dining in New York City on Monday ” .
Restaurants , it should be noted , are still permitted to offer take-out , delivery , and outdoor dining options .
This announcement follows a statement from Cuomo earlier this week that , if New York City ’ s hospitalization rate has not stabilized , indoor dining would either be closed or reduced .
Comparatively , New York City was slower than the rest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ restrictions after the initial spring months of the pandemic during which it became the United States ’ deadly epicenter .
While the city only allowed indoor dining to resume at 25 % capacity on September 30 , neighboring Long Island ’ s two counties , for example , began to allow indoor dining back in late June at 50 % capacity .
During the previous virtual presser , Cuomo also made a point in calling on the federal government to provide economic relief to businesses affected by the pandemic and the accompanying restrictions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ City finding themselves economically and fiscally devastated by the virus .
“ The federal government must provide relief to bars and restaurants in this next [ stimulus ] package , ” Cuomo urged .
This latest development from Cuomo comes as United States ’ total coronavirus death toll surpasses 282,000 , according to Johns Hopkins University , with its total confirmed infections climbing well past 15 million .
( TLB ) published this article from The Sarah Carter Show You can follow Douglas Braff on Twitter @ Douglas_P_Braff .
The Liberty Beacon Project @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use @ @ @ @ @ @ @ authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Janice Dean slams Gov. Cuomo over decision to end indoor dining: ‘donate all of the proceeds’ from your book to ‘restaurants you’re closing’
Douglas Braff
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) announced Friday that indoor dining in New York City will be terminated again as COVID-19 cases in the city’s five boroughs and the rest of the state continue to skyrocket, as well as across the whole United States.
In response to Gov. Cuomo’s order, Fox News’ Janice Dean, who has been a fierce advocate against the New York leader’s handling of the virus suggested he “donate all of the proceeds including the huge advance from your fictional ‘leadership’ book to all the restaurants you’re closing.”
Dean has fought tirelessly to expose Gov. Cuomo’s order at the start of COVID-19 that forced nursing homes to take in recovering patients with the virus. She lost loved ones as a result of that very order.
Hey tough guy @NYGovCuomo why not donate all the proceeds including the huge advance from your fictional “leadership” book to all the restaurants you’re closing. You did not succeed in New York. In fact you are making things even worse. — Janice Dean (@JaniceDean) December 11, 2020
Because New York City’s number of coronavirus cases and hospitalizations have increased drastically during the past two weeks, the three-term governor stated during a virtual press conference that “[w]e’re going to close indoor dining in New York City on Monday”.
Restaurants, it should be noted, are still permitted to offer take-out, delivery, and outdoor dining options.
This announcement follows a statement from Cuomo earlier this week that, if New York City’s hospitalization rate has not stabilized, indoor dining would either be closed or reduced.
Comparatively, New York City was slower than the rest of the state in loosening its coronavirus restrictions after the initial spring months of the pandemic during which it became the United States’ deadly epicenter. While the city only allowed indoor dining to resume at 25% capacity on September 30, neighboring Long Island’s two counties, for example, began to allow indoor dining back in late June at 50% capacity.
During the previous virtual presser, Cuomo also made a point in calling on the federal government to provide economic relief to businesses affected by the pandemic and the accompanying restrictions, amidst both New York State and City finding themselves economically and fiscally devastated by the virus.
“The federal government must provide relief to bars and restaurants in this next [stimulus] package,” Cuomo urged.
This latest development from Cuomo comes as United States’ total coronavirus death toll surpasses 282,000, according to Johns Hopkins University, with its total confirmed infections climbing well past 15 million.
*********
(TLB) published this article from The Sarah Carter Show
You can follow Douglas Braff on Twitter @Douglas_P_Braff.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-12--6 Dead from Pfizer Vaccine Trials – Shares Down – But Pfizer CEO Makes a Killing

Six dead from Pfizer trials – shares down – Pfizer CEO makes a killing There is a good old Russian word “ yerunda ” which I ’ ve started using instead of “ nonsense ” and “ bullshit ” to describe the scaremongering COVID-19 narrative blasted at us from morning to night , not because it says anything different but because it gives me an extra synonym in my arsenal in fighting the nonsensical war waged upon us by super-rich controllers of world economic systems .
Keep watching the BBC , and other mainstream channels alone , and you will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the world .
Remember when the buzz-phrase “ herd immunity ” was all the rage ?
Remember when it was Boris Johnson and Matt Hancock ’ s early remedy for COVID-19 ?
Now we ’ ve all got herd immunity you don ’ t hear the phrase any more .
Instead , those stupid enough to be tested , may very well test positive because of exposure ( herd immunity ) and add to the “ alarming ” figures as presented by the UK government to get people locked down , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ brew concoction which has already killed six people in US trials .
Two died from the vaccine , four from the placebo .
This prompts the question : what is in the placebo ?
Pfizer BioNTech have not even revealed what is in the vaccine .
Yesterday BioNTech shares were down more than 4 % at the close .
Pfizer shares were down by nearly 2 % .
Less than a month ago the CEO of Pfizer , Albert Bourla , dumped 60 % of his shares in Pfizer at its highest trading @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the vaccine .
Do you think he knows what ’ s coming ?
As well as herd immunity another item we hear little of these days is COVID-19 deaths .
That is because nobody is dying from the virus .
Now , because of herd immunity , people who die , only need to have been tested positive for the virus , to be recorded as COVID-19 deaths , whatever they actually died from , regardless of what caused their admission to hospital .
I covered that topic here .
So there you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is no pandemic .
The spin-doctor , Matt Hancock , is more like a witch-doctor .
He will spin a story one way , as with herd immunity , then another way , to lock you down eternally , to get you all vaccinated with an experimental vaccine for a virus that long since left the building .
No wonder I call this yerunda out for what it is .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Six dead from Pfizer trials – shares down – Pfizer CEO makes a killing
By: John Gross
There is a good old Russian word “yerunda” which I’ve started using instead of “nonsense” and “bullshit” to describe the scaremongering COVID-19 narrative blasted at us from morning to night, not because it says anything different but because it gives me an extra synonym in my arsenal in fighting the nonsensical war waged upon us by super-rich controllers of world economic systems.
Keep watching the BBC, and other mainstream channels alone, and you will never know what’s going on in the world. Remember when the buzz-phrase “herd immunity” was all the rage? Remember when it was Boris Johnson and Matt Hancock’s early remedy for COVID-19? Now we’ve all got herd immunity you don’t hear the phrase any more.
Instead, those stupid enough to be tested, may very well test positive because of exposure (herd immunity) and add to the “alarming” figures as presented by the UK government to get people locked down, and vaccinated with the Pfizer BioNTech witches’ brew concoction which has already killed six people in US trials. Two died from the vaccine, four from the placebo. This prompts the question: what is in the placebo? Pfizer BioNTech have not even revealed what is in the vaccine.
Yesterday BioNTech shares were down more than 4% at the close. Pfizer shares were down by nearly 2%. Less than a month ago the CEO of Pfizer, Albert Bourla, dumped 60% of his shares in Pfizer at its highest trading point, denying insider trading while praising the vaccine. Do you think he knows what’s coming?
As well as herd immunity another item we hear little of these days is COVID-19 deaths. That is because nobody is dying from the virus. Now, because of herd immunity, people who die, only need to have been tested positive for the virus, to be recorded as COVID-19 deaths, whatever they actually died from, regardless of what caused their admission to hospital. I covered that topic here.
So there you have it in a nutshell. There is no pandemic. The spin-doctor, Matt Hancock, is more like a witch-doctor. He will spin a story one way, as with herd immunity, then another way, to lock you down eternally, to get you all vaccinated with an experimental vaccine for a virus that long since left the building. No wonder I call this yerunda out for what it is.
••••
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-12--Is Attorney General Barr a coward? [A Jon Rappoport commentary]

“ To date , we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election , ” Barr told the AP .
[ 1 ] That ’ s because he isn ’ t looking .
Here are several sites , among hundreds , that carry evidence of vote fraud on a continuing basis : American Thinker [ 2 ] , Infowars [ 3 ] , Gateway Pundit [ 4 ] , Revolver.news [ 5 ] , the Air Vent blog [ 6 ] .
Barr has now appointed a special counsel , John @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
The man in the moon ?
Richard Nixon ?
I ’ m sure we ’ ll get a report by 2026 .
Slick Willie Barr ’ s remark to AP sent a signal to judges and lawyers : the Justice Department isn ’ t active , relax , no need to rush , feel free to dismiss cases , you won ’ t be risking adverse consequences .
That , from the number-one law enforcement man in the nation .
Meanwhile , if you visit those sites , I just mentioned , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ evidence of fraud .
Ballot stuffing .
Invented ballots .
Backdated ballots .
Failure to allow observers to monitor massive amounts of vote counting .
Statistical anomalies showing impossible vote results .
Vote switching .
Electronic machine vulnerabilities .
Software back doors .
Fractional vote counts instead of raw number counts .
Dominion and Smartmatic connections to foreign entities .
The vote-count apparatus connected to the internet and therefore vulnerable to switches in numbers .
Battleground states stopping the vote count on election night , after which huge numbers of votes changed from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ affidavits from poll workers attesting to fraud .
Boarded up windows to block observers from watching vote counts , even from a distance .
Observers intimidated and ordered to move away from vote counting personnel .
Reputable data analysts stating vote fraud was occurring on a large scale .
Other than THAT , not a hint of impropriety .
Nothing to see , forget about it .
And Barr didn ’ t need to say he was sure the election was a fraud ; he only needed to say there was reason for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ far-reaching INVESTIGATION .
But he wouldn ’ t even say that .
And lest we forget , this election was CALLED BY THE NEWS NETWORKS .
That ’ s what “ election result ” MEANS so far .
That ’ s all it means .
Some of the networks take their election information from the Associated Press .
But the AP is a consortium OF those same networks .
In other words , the news networks take their election information from themselves .
And on the strength of THAT , Attorney General Barr @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been decided ; and there is no reason to mount an all-out investigation of the “ result.
” Pundits are worried that Trump ’ s attack on the outcome makes the US look like a banana republic , in the eyes of the rest of the world .
Sorry , too late for that concern .
When news networks call the election based on projections from themselves , we ’ re looking at a closed system , a bubble , a banana 3000 miles long .
Barr is a banana plantation boss , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ eyes .
In an act of extreme kindness , he should be busted down to hosing off dust and sand from cop cars in Death Valley .
He ’ s made himself into—or he already was—a double agent .
While professing support for the president , he was preparing to undermine him .
Trump , throughout his term in office , has shown an uncanny ability to choose key people who are actually out to destroy him .
I believe he thought Mike Flynn would be his main protector and buffer , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ didn ’ t know where to turn .
He was at sea .
A CEO or Commander-in-Chief is supposed to be better than that .
Barr ’ s refusal to declare an all-out war on election fraud creates a gigantic confusion .
While court cases and state legislative hearings move along , and evidence of fraud piles up , the DOJ stands aside , as if these momentous events are of no more interest than a spring baseball game .
CRIMINAL CHARGES are at the bottom of this national disgrace .
And there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dereliction of duty ought to be a felony , Barr has a built-in protection .
Prosecutorial discretion .
It means a government lawyer can pick and choose his cases .
He can go to court or not go to court .
“ Let ’ s see .
We have the murder weapon .
The suspect ’ s prints are on the gun , which the cops found in his hand as he was standing over the dead body of the victim .
We have surveillance video which shows the suspect shooting the victim @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re going to pass on this case .
The killer has no previous record .
He ’ s from a good family… ” For readers , and for Slick Willie Barr , I want to describe one expert witness to fraud who has already stepped forward .
He is just one of a number of such witnesses .
Just one .
But if he doesn ’ t sound alarm bells for the Justice Department , indicating that an IMMEDIATE investigation must be launched yesterday , nobody will sound those alarms .
Navid @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the US intelligence community .
This is not necessarily a positive recommendation .
However , such people are often cited as reliable by the press and the government .
They ’ re courted and coddled and quoted and used to make cases .
Andrea Widburg , writing at American Thinker , headlines her piece , “ The ‘ smartest man in the room ’ has joined Sidney Powell ’ s team ” : [ 7 ] “ Dr .
Kershavarz-Nia ’ s name may not mean a lot to you , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ names in the world when it comes to sniffing out cyber-security problems.
” “ We know how important Dr. Kershavarz-Nia is because , just two and a half months ago , the New York Times ran one of its Sunday long-form articles about a massive , multi-million-dollar fraud that a talented grifter ran against the American intelligence and military communities .
Dr. Kershavarz-Nia is one of the few people who comes off looking good ” : ( Quoting the Times ) “ Navid Keshavarz-Nia , those who worked with him said , ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ room.
’ In doing cybersecurity and technical counterintelligence work for the C.I.A.
, N.S.A .
and F.B.I.
, he had spent decades connecting top-secret dots… ” Widburg continues at American thinker : “ Not only does Dr. Kershavarz-Nia have an innate intelligence , but he ’ s also got extraordinary academic and practical skills in cyber-fraud detection and analysis… ” “ His qualifications include a B.A.
, M.A.
, and Ph.D. in various areas of electrical and computer engineering .
In addition , ‘ I have advanced trained from the Defense Intelligence Agency @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( CIA ) , National Security Agency ( NSA ) , DHS office of Intelligence & Analysis ( I & A ) and Massachusetts Institution of Technology ( MIT ) ’ .
” “ Professionally , Dr. Kershavarz-Nia has spent his career as a cyber-security engineer .
‘ My experience , ’ he attests , ‘ spans 35 years performing technical assessment , mathematical modeling , cyber-attack pattern analysis , and security intelligence [ . ]
’ I will not belabor the point .
Take it as given that Dr. Kershavarz-Nia may know @ @ @ @ @ @ @ America.
” “ So what does the brilliant Dr. Kershavarz-Nia have to say ?
This : 1 .
Hammer and Scorecard [ an alleged package of CIA vote-hacking programs ] is real , not a hoax ( as Democrats allege ) , and both are used to manipulate election outcomes .
2 .
Dominion , ES & S , Scytl , and Smartmatic [ electronic vote-systems companies ] are all vulnerable to fraud and vote manipulation — and the mainstream media reported on these vulnerabilities in the past .
3 .
Dominion has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ forge election results.
’ 4 .
Dominion ’ s corporate structure is deliberately confusing to hide relationships with Venezuela , China , and Cuba .
6 .
Dominion memory cards with cryptographic key access to the systems were stolen in 2019.
” “ Although he had no access to the machines , Dr. Kershavarz has looked at available data about the election and the vote results .
Based on that information , he concluded : 1 .
The counts in the disputed states ( Pennsylvania , Wisconsin , Michigan , Arizona , Nevada @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
2 .
The simultaneous decision in Pennsylvania , Wisconsin , Arizona , Nevada , and Georgia to pretend to halt counting votes was unprecedented and demonstrated a coordinated effort to collude toward desired results .
3 .
One to two percent of votes were forged in Biden ’ s favor .
5 .
The scanners failed to keep records for audits , an outcome that must have been deliberately programmed .
6 .
The stolen cryptographic key , which applied to all voting systems , was used to alter vote counts .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ after hours for Biden could not be accounted for by a Democrat preference for mailed in ballots .
They demonstrated manipulation .
For example , in Pennsylvania , it was physically impossible to feed 400,000 ballots into the machines within 2–3 hours .
8 .
Dominion used Chinese parts , and there ’ s reason to believe that China , Venezuela , Cuba interfered in the election .
9 .
There was a Hammer and Scorecard cyber-attack that altered votes in the battleground states , and then forwarded the results to Scytl servers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ detection .
10 .
The systems failed to produce any auditable results.
” “ Based on the above findings , Dr. Keshavarz-Nia concluded with ‘ high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states resulting in a [ sic ] hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred [ sic ] to Vice President Biden ’ .
” Here ’ s a question : If you ’ re William Barr , what else do you want , in terms of qualifications , from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Navid Keshavarz-Nia is exactly the sort of person you would be looking for in serious cases .
Except , perhaps , in THIS case .
Because this case not only cuts across the grain , it proposes a titanic refutation of the announced result of a presidential election .
And not only an election , but one in which the sitting president is despised by the press , millions of Democrats , untold numbers of government employees , foreign government leaders , and rioters-in-waiting , who would stage mass destruction in cites @ @ @ @ @ @ @ favor of the sitting president .
So , Mr. Barr , in this case , who qualifies as an expert witness , to whom very close attention should be paid ?
Or does the qualification of a witness come down to WHAT he will say ?
Are you calculating which threat from which side of the political spectrum can visit the greater harm on you ?
Have you already sold out ?
If so , to what or whom ?
( TLB ) published this original article from the blog of Jon Rappoport @ @ @ @ @ @ @ raise health and freedom awareness .
Jon Rappoport is the author of three explosive collections , THE MATRIX REVEALED , EXIT FROM THE MATRIX , and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX , Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California .
He maintains a consulting practice for private clients , the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power .
Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize , he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years , writing articles on politics , medicine , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Spin Magazine , Stern , and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe .
Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics , health , logic , and creative power to audiences around the world .
You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here .

Is Attorney General Barr a coward?
Has he sold out?
Jon Rappoport
“To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election,” Barr told the AP. [1]
That’s because he isn’t looking. Here are several sites, among hundreds, that carry evidence of vote fraud on a continuing basis: American Thinker [2], Infowars [3], Gateway Pundit [4], Revolver.news [5], the Air Vent blog [6].
Credit/FOX News
Barr has now appointed a special counsel, John Durham, to look into…what? Russiagate? The man in the moon? Richard Nixon? I’m sure we’ll get a report by 2026.
Slick Willie Barr’s remark to AP sent a signal to judges and lawyers: the Justice Department isn’t active, relax, no need to rush, feel free to dismiss cases, you won’t be risking adverse consequences.
That, from the number-one law enforcement man in the nation.
Meanwhile, if you visit those sites, I just mentioned, you’ll find all sorts of evidence of fraud. Ballot stuffing. Invented ballots. Backdated ballots. Failure to allow observers to monitor massive amounts of vote counting. Statistical anomalies showing impossible vote results. Vote switching. Electronic machine vulnerabilities. Software back doors. Fractional vote counts instead of raw number counts. Dominion and Smartmatic connections to foreign entities. The vote-count apparatus connected to the internet and therefore vulnerable to switches in numbers. Battleground states stopping the vote count on election night, after which huge numbers of votes changed from Trump to Biden. Alarming numbers of affidavits from poll workers attesting to fraud. Boarded up windows to block observers from watching vote counts, even from a distance. Observers intimidated and ordered to move away from vote counting personnel. Reputable data analysts stating vote fraud was occurring on a large scale.
Other than THAT, not a hint of impropriety. Nothing to see, forget about it.
And Barr didn’t need to say he was sure the election was a fraud; he only needed to say there was reason for the DOJ to do an immediate and far-reaching INVESTIGATION.
But he wouldn’t even say that.
And lest we forget, this election was CALLED BY THE NEWS NETWORKS. That’s what “election result” MEANS so far. That’s all it means.
Some of the networks take their election information from the Associated Press. But the AP is a consortium OF those same networks.
In other words, the news networks take their election information from themselves.
And on the strength of THAT, Attorney General Barr believes the result of the election has been decided; and there is no reason to mount an all-out investigation of the “result.”
Pundits are worried that Trump’s attack on the outcome makes the US look like a banana republic, in the eyes of the rest of the world.
Sorry, too late for that concern. When news networks call the election based on projections from themselves, we’re looking at a closed system, a bubble, a banana 3000 miles long.
Barr is a banana plantation boss, protecting the terminally corrupt territory from prying eyes.
In an act of extreme kindness, he should be busted down to hosing off dust and sand from cop cars in Death Valley.
He’s made himself into—or he already was—a double agent. While professing support for the president, he was preparing to undermine him.
Trump, throughout his term in office, has shown an uncanny ability to choose key people who are actually out to destroy him. I believe he thought Mike Flynn would be his main protector and buffer, and when Flynn was taken down, Trump didn’t know where to turn. He was at sea. A CEO or Commander-in-Chief is supposed to be better than that.
Barr’s refusal to declare an all-out war on election fraud creates a gigantic confusion. While court cases and state legislative hearings move along, and evidence of fraud piles up, the DOJ stands aside, as if these momentous events are of no more interest than a spring baseball game.
CRIMINAL CHARGES are at the bottom of this national disgrace. And there are no criminal charges.
Although extreme dereliction of duty ought to be a felony, Barr has a built-in protection. Prosecutorial discretion. It means a government lawyer can pick and choose his cases. He can go to court or not go to court.
“Let’s see. We have the murder weapon. The suspect’s prints are on the gun, which the cops found in his hand as he was standing over the dead body of the victim. We have surveillance video which shows the suspect shooting the victim. But you know what? We’re going to pass on this case. The killer has no previous record. He’s from a good family…”
For readers, and for Slick Willie Barr, I want to describe one expert witness to fraud who has already stepped forward. He is just one of a number of such witnesses. Just one. But if he doesn’t sound alarm bells for the Justice Department, indicating that an IMMEDIATE investigation must be launched yesterday, nobody will sound those alarms.
Navid Keshavarz-Nia. His credentials include extensive work for the US intelligence community. This is not necessarily a positive recommendation. However, such people are often cited as reliable by the press and the government. They’re courted and coddled and quoted and used to make cases.
Andrea Widburg, writing at American Thinker, headlines her piece, “The ‘smartest man in the room’ has joined Sidney Powell’s team”: [7]
“Dr. Kershavarz-Nia’s name may not mean a lot to you, but it’s one of the weightiest names in the world when it comes to sniffing out cyber-security problems.”
“We know how important Dr. Kershavarz-Nia is because, just two and a half months ago, the New York Times ran one of its Sunday long-form articles about a massive, multi-million-dollar fraud that a talented grifter ran against the American intelligence and military communities. Dr. Kershavarz-Nia is one of the few people who comes off looking good”:
(Quoting the Times) “Navid Keshavarz-Nia, those who worked with him said, ‘was always the smartest person in the room.’ In doing cybersecurity and technical counterintelligence work for the C.I.A., N.S.A. and F.B.I., he had spent decades connecting top-secret dots…”
Widburg continues at American thinker: “Not only does Dr. Kershavarz-Nia have an innate intelligence, but he’s also got extraordinary academic and practical skills in cyber-fraud detection and analysis…”
“His qualifications include a B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. in various areas of electrical and computer engineering. In addition, ‘I have advanced trained from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA), DHS office of Intelligence & Analysis (I&A) and Massachusetts Institution of Technology (MIT)’.”
“Professionally, Dr. Kershavarz-Nia has spent his career as a cyber-security engineer. ‘My experience,’ he attests, ‘spans 35 years performing technical assessment, mathematical modeling, cyber-attack pattern analysis, and security intelligence[.]’ I will not belabor the point. Take it as given that Dr. Kershavarz-Nia may know more about cyber-security than anyone else in America.”
“So what does the brilliant Dr. Kershavarz-Nia have to say? This:
1. Hammer and Scorecard [an alleged package of CIA vote-hacking programs] is real, not a hoax (as Democrats allege), and both are used to manipulate election outcomes.
2. Dominion, ES&S, Scytl, and Smartmatic [electronic vote-systems companies] are all vulnerable to fraud and vote manipulation — and the mainstream media reported on these vulnerabilities in the past.
3. Dominion has been used in other countries to ‘forge election results.’
4. Dominion’s corporate structure is deliberately confusing to hide relationships with Venezuela, China, and Cuba.
5. Dominion machines are easily hackable.
6. Dominion memory cards with cryptographic key access to the systems were stolen in 2019.”
“Although he had no access to the machines, Dr. Kershavarz has looked at available data about the election and the vote results. Based on that information, he concluded:
1. The counts in the disputed states (Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia) show electronic manipulation.
2. The simultaneous decision in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia to pretend to halt counting votes was unprecedented and demonstrated a coordinated effort to collude toward desired results.
3. One to two percent of votes were forged in Biden’s favor.
4. Optical scanners were set to accept unverified, un-validated ballots.
5. The scanners failed to keep records for audits, an outcome that must have been deliberately programmed.
6. The stolen cryptographic key, which applied to all voting systems, was used to alter vote counts.
7. The favorable votes pouring in after hours for Biden could not be accounted for by a Democrat preference for mailed in ballots. They demonstrated manipulation. For example, in Pennsylvania, it was physically impossible to feed 400,000 ballots into the machines within 2–3 hours.
8. Dominion used Chinese parts, and there’s reason to believe that China, Venezuela, Cuba interfered in the election.
9. There was a Hammer and Scorecard cyber-attack that altered votes in the battleground states, and then forwarded the results to Scytl servers in Frankfurt, Germany, to avoid detection.
10. The systems failed to produce any auditable results.”
“Based on the above findings, Dr. Keshavarz-Nia concluded with ‘high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states resulting in a [sic] hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred [sic] to Vice President Biden’.”
—end of quotes from American Thinker article—
Here’s a question: If you’re William Barr, what else do you want, in terms of qualifications, from an expert witness?
From all appearances, Navid Keshavarz-Nia is exactly the sort of person you would be looking for in serious cases.
Except, perhaps, in THIS case. Because this case not only cuts across the grain, it proposes a titanic refutation of the announced result of a presidential election. And not only an election, but one in which the sitting president is despised by the press, millions of Democrats, untold numbers of government employees, foreign government leaders, and rioters-in-waiting, who would stage mass destruction in cites, if the election is resolved in favor of the sitting president.
So, Mr. Barr, in this case, who qualifies as an expert witness, to whom very close attention should be paid? Or does the qualification of a witness come down to WHAT he will say?
Are you calculating which threat from which side of the political spectrum can visit the greater harm on you?
Have you already sold out? If so, to what or whom?
Your own fear?
“Yet panics, in some cases, have their uses; they produce as much good as hurt. Their duration is always short; the mind soon grows through them, and acquires a firmer habit than before. But their peculiar advantage is, that they are the touchstones of sincerity and hypocrisy, and bring things and men to light, which might otherwise have lain forever undiscovered. In fact, they have the same effect on secret traitors, which an imaginary apparition would have upon a private murderer. They sift out the hidden thoughts of man, and hold them up in public to the world.” Thomas Paine, The Crisis, December 23, 1776.
Your move, Mr. Barr.
SOURCES:
[1] https://apnews.com/article/barr-no-widespread-election-fraud-b1f1488796c9a98c4b1a9061a6c7f49d
[2] https://www.americanthinker.com/
[3] https://www.infowars.com/ and https://banned.video/
[4] https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/
[5] https://www.revolver.news/
[6] https://noconsensus.wordpress.com/
[7] https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/11/the_smartest_man_in_the_room_has_joined_sidney_powells_team.html
*********
Header/Barr/Credit: AP News.com
Pictorial content and emphasis added by (TLB) editors
(TLB) published this original article from the blog of Jon Rappoport with our appreciation for his contribution to raise health and freedom awareness.
Jon Rappoport is the author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-12--Trump responds to Supreme Court defeat: ‘Fight on!’

President Trump expressed disapproval late Friday at the Supreme Court ’ s rejection of a Texas lawsuit challenging the election but signaled he plans to “ fight on.
” “ The Supreme Court really let us down .
No Wisdom , No Courage !
” Trump tweeted .
Trump ’ s lawyers said he had instructed them to explore alternate legal strategies to challenge Joe Biden ’ s lead in key states with senior legal adviser Jenna Ellis suggesting Jan. 6 — the day Congress is slated to accept electors decision — was their final deadline .
“ So , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ United States , and you just went through an election where you got more votes than any sitting President in history , by far – and purportedly lost , ” Trump explained in his tweet .
“ You can ’ t get ‘ standing ’ before the Supreme Court , so you ‘ intervene ’ with wonderful states that , after careful study and consideration , think you got ‘ screwed ’ , something which will hurt them also , ” he added .
“ Many others likewise join the suit but , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out and gone , without even looking at the many reasons it was brought .
A Rigged Election , fight on !
” March for Trump rally scheduled for Saturday noon in Washington , D.C. ( TLB ) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News Some emphasis and pictorial content added by ( TLB ) Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .
Disclaimer : The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including , but not limited to , text @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are not intended as medical advice or instruction .
Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice , diagnosis or treatment .

(TLB) ed: March for Trump rally scheduled for today at noon in Washington, D.C.
Trump responds to Supreme Court defeat: ‘Fight on!’
President expresses disappointment at justices’ refusal to review Texas case but tells lawyers to find alternate strategy.
By John Solomon
President Trump expressed disapproval late Friday at the Supreme Court’s rejection of a Texas lawsuit challenging the election but signaled he plans to “fight on.”
“The Supreme Court really let us down. No Wisdom, No Courage!” Trump tweeted.
Trump’s lawyers said he had instructed them to explore alternate legal strategies to challenge Joe Biden’s lead in key states with senior legal adviser Jenna Ellis suggesting Jan. 6 — the day Congress is slated to accept electors decision — was their final deadline.
“So, you’re the President of the United States, and you just went through an election where you got more votes than any sitting President in history, by far – and purportedly lost,” Trump explained in his tweet. “You can’t get ‘standing’ before the Supreme Court, so you ‘intervene’ with wonderful states that, after careful study and consideration, think you got ‘screwed’, something which will hurt them also,” he added. “Many others likewise join the suit but, within a flash, it is thrown out and gone, without even looking at the many reasons it was brought. A Rigged Election, fight on!”
_________
RELATED
*********
(TLB) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News
Some emphasis and pictorial content added by (TLB)
Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-12--Rudy Giuliani: It’s Not Over, we can’t let them roll over this or … It Will Get Worse

Rudy : It ’ s not over , we can ’ t let them roll over this or it will get worse Rudy Giuliani said it ’ s not over in response to a question about the Texas SCOTUS case .
SCOTUS did not reject the case on its merits which means they have the option to go to district courts where they do have standing .
They will start filing cases immediately .
America ’ s mayor said he doesn ’ t understand Justices Alito and Thomas ’ s statement that they would hear the case but do nothing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be heard , and this kind of voter fraud has to be nipped in the bud , or it will worsen .
The only person who has the courage to stand up to it is Donald Trump .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .
Disclaimer : The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including , but not limited to , text , graphics , images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction .
Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice , diagnosis or treatment .

Rudy: It’s not over, we can’t let them roll over this or it will get worse
By: M. Dowling
Rudy Giuliani said it’s not over in response to a question about the Texas SCOTUS case. SCOTUS did not reject the case on its merits which means they have the option to go to district courts where they do have standing. They will start filing cases immediately.
America’s mayor said he doesn’t understand Justices Alito and Thomas’s statement that they would hear the case but do nothing about it.
The facts need to be heard, and this kind of voter fraud has to be nipped in the bud, or it will worsen. The only person who has the courage to stand up to it is Donald Trump.
Watch:
•••• Related Article (click on image below to read): ••••
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-13--“We Hadn’t Really Thought Through the Economic Impacts” … Melinda Gates

“ We Hadn ’ t Really Thought Through the Economic Impacts ” ~ Melinda Gates In a wide-ranging interview in the New York Times , Melinda Gates made the following remarkable statement : “ What did surprise us is we hadn ’ t really thought through the economic impacts.
” A cynic might observe that one is disinclined to think much about matters than do not affect one personally .
It ’ s a maddening statement , to be sure , as if “ economics ” is somehow a peripheral concern to the rest of human life and public health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reveals the statement to be even more confused .
She is somehow under the impression that it is the pandemic and not the lockdowns that are the cause of the economic devastation that includes perhaps 30 % of restaurants going under , among many other terrible effects .
She doesn ’ t say that outright but , like many articles in the mainstream press over this year , she very carefully crafts her words to avoid the crucial subject of lockdowns as the primary cause of economic disaster .
It ’ s possible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what tanked the world economy on its own but that is a completely unsustainable proposition .
Further , her comments provide a perfect illustration of the core problem all along : most of the people who have been advocating lockdowns in fact have no actual experience in managing pandemics .
To many of these , Covid-19 became their new playground to try out an unprecedented experiment in social and economic management : shutting down travel , businesses , schools , churches , and issuing stay-at-home orders that smack of totalitarian impositions .
Here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ project out and think about what a pandemic might be like or look like , but until you live through it , it ’ s pretty hard to know what the reality will be like .
So I think we predicted quite well that , depending on what the disease was , it could spread very , very , very quickly .
The spread did not surprise us .
What did surprise us is we hadn ’ t really thought through the economic impacts .
What happens when you have a pandemic that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over the world ?
The fact that we would all be home , and working from home if we were lucky enough to do that .
That was a piece that I think we hadn ’ t really prepared for .
There are plenty of specialists who have lived through pandemics in the past and managed them by maintaining essential social and economic functioning .
A major case in point is Donald A. Henderson , who as head of the World Health Organization is given primary credit for the eradication of smallpox .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Experience has shown that communities faced with epidemics or other adverse events respond best and with the least anxiety when the normal social functioning of the community is least disrupted .
Strong political and public health leadership to provide reassurance and to ensure that needed medical care services are provided are critical elements .
If either is seen to be less than optimal , a manageable epidemic could move toward catastrophe .
Melinda together with her husband Bill have been the major funding source for pro-lockdown efforts around the world , giving $ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also funding a huge range of academic departments , labs , and media venues for many years , during which time they have both sounded the alarm in every possible interview about the coming pathogen .
Their favored policy has been lockdown , as if to confuse a biological virus with a computer virus that merely needs to be blocked from hitting the hard drive .
We can look at how this disease traveled around the world and see that the countries who locked down first , they ’ re doing better .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ locked it down early .
Their replication rate just never got as high as many other countries .
And that is a good thing .
While it is true that Africa is an odd outlier , the claim that this is due entirely to early lockdowns has no support .
Those who have looked at the anomaly in Africa point to the very young population ( just 3 % are over 65 ) , cross immunities with other coronaviruses as the main reason for the low death rate , and stronger overall immunities @ @ @ @ @ @ @ account for nearly the whole of the mortality difference with Europe and the U.S .
In addition , Melinda says here what Bill has said for years : the only solution to a virus is to suppress it and develop a vaccine – the previously untested experiment that has brought poverty , death , and despair to the entire world .
Africa in particular was devastated by lockdowns .
It ’ s still a good thing that she is opening up to the New York Times so that we can gain better perspective @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a reckoning in the coming year concerning why and how all this happened to us .
There will be no chance of suppressing the reality of what has happened .
Indeed the center-left press is already starting to admit what AIER has been saying since March 2020 .
Consider this roundup from just the last several days : By Drew Holden ( What Has Lockdown Done to Us ?
By Drew Holden ( Some researchers worry that the social isolation has inflicted damage to mental health that will outlast even the worst of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a full accounting of the consequences for years to come….There will be significant long term consequences from school closures as well .
About half of the country ’ s school districts held remote classes , either exclusively or partially , at the start of the year .
This approach has meaningfully reduced educational quality , particularly for children of color .
These losses don ’ t even take into account the direct effects of the lockdowns on the economy .
Small businesses have closed their doors at very high rates as the American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
One study estimates that 60 percent of the millions of jobs lost between January and April were a result of the lockdowns , not the virus itself .
The economic uncertainty caused by unemployment comes with its own health risks… .
These tragedies have become an ambient backdrop to everyday life : present but forgotten , real but ignored .
Perhaps America has simply gotten comfortable ignoring the quiet suffering of others .
“ ” by Julia Marcus ( The Problem With Underestimating How Much People Want to Be Together ” by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ used as pretext to curtail civil rights around the world , finds report ” ( by Anna North ( Vox ) The parental burnout crisis has reached a tipping point by Anna North ( Vox ) “ Many aren ’ t buying public officials ’ ‘ stay-at-home ’ message .
Experts say there ’ s a better way ” ( Finally , it ’ s tremendously gratifying that the last column of the mighty genius Walter Williams specifically named the Great Barrington Declaration as the answer : The authors of the Great Barrington @ @ @ @ @ @ @ most everyone would come to see that the traditional principles of public health prevail over the previously untested and now failed policy of lockdowns .
They spoke out when they did as a means of forcing the issue , and their courage will long echo in the annals of history .
Now if we could only get Melinda Gates to see it .

“We Hadn’t Really Thought Through the Economic Impacts” ~ Melinda Gates
By: Jeffrey A. Tucker
In a wide-ranging interview in the New York Times, Melinda Gates made the following remarkable statement: “What did surprise us is we hadn’t really thought through the economic impacts.” A cynic might observe that one is disinclined to think much about matters than do not affect one personally.
It’s a maddening statement, to be sure, as if “economics” is somehow a peripheral concern to the rest of human life and public health. The larger context of the interview reveals the statement to be even more confused. She is somehow under the impression that it is the pandemic and not the lockdowns that are the cause of the economic devastation that includes perhaps 30% of restaurants going under, among many other terrible effects.
She doesn’t say that outright but, like many articles in the mainstream press over this year, she very carefully crafts her words to avoid the crucial subject of lockdowns as the primary cause of economic disaster. It’s possible that she actually believes this virus is what tanked the world economy on its own but that is a completely unsustainable proposition.
Further, her comments provide a perfect illustration of the core problem all along: most of the people who have been advocating lockdowns in fact have no actual experience in managing pandemics. To many of these, Covid-19 became their new playground to try out an unprecedented experiment in social and economic management: shutting down travel, businesses, schools, churches, and issuing stay-at-home orders that smack of totalitarian impositions.
Here is what she says:
You can project out and think about what a pandemic might be like or look like, but until you live through it, it’s pretty hard to know what the reality will be like. So I think we predicted quite well that, depending on what the disease was, it could spread very, very, very quickly. The spread did not surprise us. What did surprise us is we hadn’t really thought through the economic impacts. What happens when you have a pandemic that’s running rampant in populations all over the world? The fact that we would all be home, and working from home if we were lucky enough to do that. That was a piece that I think we hadn’t really prepared for.
There are plenty of specialists who have lived through pandemics in the past and managed them by maintaining essential social and economic functioning. A major case in point is Donald A. Henderson, who as head of the World Health Organization is given primary credit for the eradication of smallpox. He wrote as follows in 2006:
Experience has shown that communities faced with epidemics or other adverse events respond best and with the least anxiety when the normal social functioning of the community is least disrupted. Strong political and public health leadership to provide reassurance and to ensure that needed medical care services are provided are critical elements. If either is seen to be less than optimal, a manageable epidemic could move toward catastrophe.
Melinda together with her husband Bill have been the major funding source for pro-lockdown efforts around the world, giving $500M since the pandemic began, but also funding a huge range of academic departments, labs, and media venues for many years, during which time they have both sounded the alarm in every possible interview about the coming pathogen. Their favored policy has been lockdown, as if to confuse a biological virus with a computer virus that merely needs to be blocked from hitting the hard drive.
We can look at how this disease traveled around the world and see that the countries who locked down first, they’re doing better. Many African countries saw it coming and locked it down early. Their replication rate just never got as high as many other countries. And that is a good thing.
While it is true that Africa is an odd outlier, the claim that this is due entirely to early lockdowns has no support. Those who have looked at the anomaly in Africa point to the very young population (just 3% are over 65), cross immunities with other coronaviruses as the main reason for the low death rate, and stronger overall immunities. Indeed, the demographics alone could account for nearly the whole of the mortality difference with Europe and the U.S. In addition, Melinda says here what Bill has said for years: the only solution to a virus is to suppress it and develop a vaccine – the previously untested experiment that has brought poverty, death, and despair to the entire world. Africa in particular was devastated by lockdowns.
It’s still a good thing that she is opening up to the New York Times so that we can gain better perspective on her outlook. There will be a reckoning in the coming year concerning why and how all this happened to us. There will be no chance of suppressing the reality of what has happened. Indeed the center-left press is already starting to admit what AIER has been saying since March 2020.
Consider this roundup from just the last several days:
Some researchers worry that the social isolation has inflicted damage to mental health that will outlast even the worst of the pandemic. We may not have a full accounting of the consequences for years to come….There will be significant long term consequences from school closures as well. About half of the country’s school districts held remote classes, either exclusively or partially, at the start of the year. This approach has meaningfully reduced educational quality, particularly for children of color. These losses don’t even take into account the direct effects of the lockdowns on the economy. Small businesses have closed their doors at very high rates as the American economy sputtered in response to stay-at-home orders. One study estimates that 60 percent of the millions of jobs lost between January and April were a result of the lockdowns, not the virus itself. The economic uncertainty caused by unemployment comes with its own health risks…. These tragedies have become an ambient backdrop to everyday life: present but forgotten, real but ignored. Perhaps America has simply gotten comfortable ignoring the quiet suffering of others.
When a public-health approach isn’t producing the desired outcome, it’s time to try something different. Instead of yelling even louder about Christmas than about Thanksgiving, government officials, health professionals, and ordinary Americans alike might try this: Stop all the chastising. Remember that the public is fraying. And consider the possibility that when huge numbers of people indicate through their actions that seeing loved ones in person is nonnegotiable, they need practical ways to reduce risk that go beyond “Just say no.”
The state of civil liberties around the world is bleak, according to a new study which found that 87% of the global population were living in nations deemed “closed”, “repressed” or “obstructed”…..A number of governments have used the pandemic as an excuse to curtail rights such as free speech, peaceful assembly and freedom of association, according to Civicus Monitor, an alliance of civil society groups which assessed 196 countries.
Lack of child care is likely a big reason more than 850,000 women dropped out of the workforce in September — more than in any other month on record except for this April, Covert reports. Overall, moms have borne a bigger share of the pandemic parenting burden than dads, with 80 percent of mothers of kids under 12 saying they are responsible for the majority of distance learning in their homes in one April survey. And single moms have been the hardest-hit of all: The share of unpartnered moms in the workforce dropped from 76.1 percent in September 2019 to 67.4 percent in September 2020, a significantly larger drop than those seen among partnered parents or single dads, according to a Pew analysis.
Health officials are up against a fatigued public, as well as a number of people who don’t believe in the danger of the virus, (Dr. Monica) Gandhi said. But she is also part of a growing number of experts who think there’s a better way to engage those who do want to take the pandemic seriously — by taking a lesson from the public health strategy known as harm reduction.
Finally, it’s tremendously gratifying that the last column of the mighty genius Walter Williams specifically named the Great Barrington Declaration as the answer:
What about the benefits and costs of dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic? Much of the medical profession and politicians say that lockdowns, social distancing, and mask-wearing are the solutions. CDC data on death rates show if one is under 35, the chances of dying from COVID-19 is much lower than that of being in a bicycle accident. Should we lock down bicycles? Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, biostatistician, and epidemiologist, Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University and an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician and epidemiologist were the initiators of the Great Barrington Declaration. More than 50,000 scientists and doctors, as well as more than 682,000 ordinary people, have signed the Great Barrington Declaration opposing a second COVID-19 lockdown because they see it doing much more harm than good.
The authors of the Great Barrington Declaration never had any doubt that eventually most everyone would come to see that the traditional principles of public health prevail over the previously untested and now failed policy of lockdowns. They spoke out when they did as a means of forcing the issue, and their courage will long echo in the annals of history. Now if we could only get Melinda Gates to see it.
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-13--Coronavirus Scandal Breaking in Merkel’s Germany Over Drosten PCR Test

ER Editor : We ’ re linking to several recent articles involving the fakery that is the PCR test and related issues , such as no longer compiling flu statistics .
See : Coronavirus Scandal Breaking in Merkel ’ s Germany .
False Positives and the Drosten PCR Test The entire case for WHO-mandated emergency lockdown of businesses , schools , churches and other social arenas worldwide is based on a test introduced , amazingly early on , in the Wuhan , China coronavirus saga .
On January 23 , 2020 , in the scientific journal Eurosurveillance , of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Dr. Christian Drosten ( pictured ) , along with several colleagues from the Berlin Virology Institute at Charité Hospital , along with the head of a small Berlin biotech company , TIB Molbiol Syntheselabor GmbH , published a study claiming to have developed the first effective test for detecting whether someone is infected with the novel coronavirus identified first only days before in Wuhan .
The Drosten article was titled , “ Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus ( 2019-nCoV ) by real-time RT-PCR ” ( Eurosurveillance 25 ( 8 ) 2020 ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ endorsement by the corrupt Director General of WHO , Tedros Adhanom , the first non-medical doctor to head WHO .
Since then , the Drosten-backed test for the virus , called a real-time or RT-PCR test , has spread via WHO worldwide as the most used test protocol to determine if a person might have COVID-19 , the illness .
On November 27 a highly-respected group of 23 international virologists , microbiologists and related scientists published a call for Eurosurveillance to retract the January 23 , 2020 Drosten article .
Their careful analysis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( ER : This is also linked to above . )
Theirs is a genuine “ peer review.
” They accuse Drosten and cohorts of “ fatal ” scientific incompetence and flaws in promoting their test .
To begin with , as the critical scientists reveal , the paper that established the Drosten PCR test for the Wuhan strain of coronavirus that has subsequently been adopted with indecent haste by the Merkel government along with WHO for worldwide use–resulting in severe lockdowns globally and an economic and social catastrophe–was never peer-reviewed before its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ point out that , Incredibly , the Drosten test protocol , which he had already sent to WHO in Geneva on 17 January , was officially recommended by WHO as the worldwide test to determine presence of Wuhan coronavirus , even before the paper had been published .
As the critical authors point out , for a subject so complex and important to world health and security , a serious 24-hour “ peer review ” from at least two experts in the field is not possible .
The critics point out that Drosten @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , did not disclose a glaring conflict of interest .
Both were also members of the editorial board of Eurosurveillance .
Further , as reported by BBC and Google Statistics , on January 21 there were a world total of 6 deaths being attributed to the Wuhan virus .
They ask , “ Why did the authors assume a challenge for public health laboratories while there was no substantial evidence at that time to indicate that the outbreak was more widespread than initially thought ?
” Another co-author of the Drosten paper that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the Drosten PCR procedure was head of the company who developed the test being marketed today , with the blessing of WHO , in the hundreds of millions , Olfert Landt ( see image ) , of Tib-Molbiol in Berlin , but Landt did not disclose that pertinent fact in the Drosten paper either .
Certainly nothing suspicious or improper here , or ?
It would be relevant to know if Drosten , the Merkel chief scientific advisor for COVID-19 , Germany ’ s de facto “ Tony Fauci , ” gets @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tib-Molbiol in their global marketing agreement with Roche .
Since late January 2020 , world mainstream media has inundated us all with frightening hourly updates on “ the total number of coronavirus infected.
” Usually they simply add each daily increase to a global total of “ confirmed cases , ” presently over 66 million .
Alarming , but for the fact that , as Pieter Borger and his fellow scientific collaborators point out , “ confirmed cases ” is a nonsense number .
Why ?
The Borger report identifies what they call @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Drosten paper of last January .
Here we take up the most glaring that can easily be grasped by most laypeople .
Drosten & co. gave confusing unspecified primer and probe sequences .
The critics note , But even more damning for Drosten is the fact that he mentioned nowhere of a test being positive or negative , or indeed what defines a positive or negative result !
The Borger report notes , “ These types of virological diagnostic tests must be based on a SOP ( Standard Operational Protocol ) , including @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cycles ( Ct value ) after which a sample is deemed positive or negative .
The maximum reasonably reliable Ct value is 30 cycles .
Above a Ct of 35 cycles , rapidly increasing numbers of false positives must be expected… scientific studies show that only non-infectious ( dead ) viruses are detected with Ct values of 35.
” ( emphasis added ) .
The WHO and Drosten recommend a Ct of 45 cycles and , reportedly , presently the German health officials do as well .
Little wonder that as the number @ @ @ @ @ @ @ onset of winter flu season , PCR “ positives ” in Germany and elsewhere explode .
As the critical authors point out , were the health authorities to specify 35 cycles maximum , the number of corona positive would be only less than 3 % the present number !
They note , “ an analytical result with a Ct value of 45 is scientifically and diagnostically absolutely meaningless ( a reasonable Ct-value should not exceed 30 ) .
All this should be communicated very clearly .
It is a significant mistake that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ct value at which a sample can be unambiguously considered as a positive or a negative test-result .
This important cycle threshold limit is also not specified in any follow-up submissions to date.
” The authors add , In simple English , the entire edifice of the Gates foundation , the Merkel government , the WHO and WEF as well as the case for de facto forced untested vaccines , rests on results of a PCR test for coronavirus that is not worth a hill of beans .
The test of Drosten and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scientific crap .
This devastating critique from twenty three world leading scientists , including scientists who have patents related to PCR , DNA Isolation and Sequencing , and a former Pfizer Chief Scientist , is damning , but not the only problem Professor Dr. Christian Drosten faces today .
He and the officials at Frankfurt ’ s Goethe University , where he claims to have received his medical doctorate in 2003 , are being accused of degree fraud .
According to Dr. Markus Kühbacher , a specialist investigating scientific fraud such as dissertation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thesis , by law must be deposited on a certain date with academic authorities at his University , who then sign a legal form , Revisionsschein , verified with signature , stamp of the University and date , with thesis title and author , to be sent to the University archive .
With it , three original copies of the thesis are filed .
Kühbacher charges that the Goethe University is guilty of cover-up by claiming , falsely , Drosten ’ s Revisionsschein , was on file .
The University spokesman later was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , at least not locatable by them .
Moreover , of the three mandatory file copies of his doctor thesis , highly relevant given the global importance of Drosten ’ s coronavirus role , two copies have “ disappeared , ” and the remaining single copy is water-damaged .
Kühbacher says Drosten will now likely face court charges for holding a fraudulent doctoral title .
Whether that comes to pass , it is a fact that a separate legal process has been filed in Berlin against two people responsible for a German media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ defamation , brought by a well-known and critical German medical doctor , Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg ( pictured ) .
The court case demands of the defendants €250,000 in damages for defamation of character and material damages to Wodarg by the accused in their online site , as well as in other German media , claiming they viciously and without proof , defamed Wodarg , calling him a “ covid-denier , ” falsely calling him a right-extremist ( he is a life-long former parliament member of the Social Democratic Party ) and numerous other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Dr Wodarg is a well-known German-American attorney , Dr. Reiner Fuellmich ( ER : pictured below from a story we ran here ) .
In his charges against the defendants , Fuellmich cites in full the charges against the Drosten test for coronavirus of Dr. Pieter Borger et al noted above .
This is in effect forcing the defendants to refute the Borger paper .
It is a major step on the way to refuting the entire WHO COVID-19 PCR testing fraud .
Already an appeals court in Lisbon , Portugal ruled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Drosten and WHO was not valid to detect coronavirus infection and that it was no basis to order nationwide or partial lockdowns .
( ER : linked to above ) If the stakes were not so deadly for mankind , it would all be material for a comedy of the absurd .
The world health Czar , WHO chief Tedros , is no medical doctor whose WHO is financed massively by a college dropout billionaire computer manager , Gates , who also advises the Merkel government on COVID-19 measures .
The Merkel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Drosten himself as an “ all-wise ” expert to impose the most draconian economic consequences outside wartime .
Her Health Minister , Jens Spahn ( pictured ) , is a former banker who has no medical degree , only a stint as a lobbyist for Big Pharma .
The head of the German CDC , called the Robert Koch Institute , Lothar Wieler , is not a virologist but an animal doctor , Tierarzt .
With this crew , Germans are seeing their lives destroyed by lockdowns and social measures never before imagined @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is science .
Not all “ science ” is valid however .
F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer , he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics , exclusively for the online magazine “ New Eastern Outlook ” where this article was originally published .
Featured image inside article : Germany ’ s leading microbiologist , Professor Christian Drosten , director of the bacteriological and epidemiological research center at Charité Hospital , Berlin .
( Photo via New Eastern Outlook @ @ @ @ @ @ @ EuropeReloaded.com

ER Editor: We’re linking to several recent articles involving the fakery that is the PCR test and related issues, such as no longer compiling flu statistics. See:
*********
Coronavirus Scandal Breaking in Merkel’s Germany. False Positives and the Drosten PCR Test F. WILLIAM ENGDAHL
The entire case for WHO-mandated emergency lockdown of businesses, schools, churches and other social arenas worldwide is based on a test introduced, amazingly early on, in the Wuhan, China coronavirus saga.
On January 23, 2020, in the scientific journal Eurosurveillance, of the EU Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Dr. Christian Drosten (pictured), along with several colleagues from the Berlin Virology Institute at Charité Hospital, along with the head of a small Berlin biotech company, TIB Molbiol Syntheselabor GmbH, published a study claiming to have developed the first effective test for detecting whether someone is infected with the novel coronavirus identified first only days before in Wuhan. The Drosten article was titled, “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR” (Eurosurveillance 25(8) 2020).
The news was greeted with immediate endorsement by the corrupt Director General of WHO, Tedros Adhanom, the first non-medical doctor to head WHO. Since then, the Drosten-backed test for the virus, called a real-time or RT-PCR test, has spread via WHO worldwide as the most used test protocol to determine if a person might have COVID-19, the illness.
On November 27 a highly-respected group of 23 international virologists, microbiologists and related scientists published a call for Eurosurveillance to retract the January 23, 2020 Drosten article. Their careful analysis of the original piece is damning. (ER: This is also linked to above.) Theirs is a genuine “peer review.”
They accuse Drosten and cohorts of “fatal” scientific incompetence and flaws in promoting their test.
To begin with, as the critical scientists reveal, the paper that established the Drosten PCR test for the Wuhan strain of coronavirus that has subsequently been adopted with indecent haste by the Merkel government along with WHO for worldwide use–resulting in severe lockdowns globally and an economic and social catastrophe–was never peer-reviewed before its publication by Eurosurveillance journal. The critics point out that,
“the Corman-Drosten paper was submitted to Eurosurveillance on January 21st 2020 and accepted for publication on January 22nd 2020. On January 23rd 2020 the paper was online.”
Incredibly, the Drosten test protocol, which he had already sent to WHO in Geneva on 17 January, was officially recommended by WHO as the worldwide test to determine presence of Wuhan coronavirus, even before the paper had been published.
As the critical authors point out, for a subject so complex and important to world health and security, a serious 24-hour “peer review” from at least two experts in the field is not possible. The critics point out that Drosten and his co-author, Dr. Chantal Reusken, did not disclose a glaring conflict of interest. Both were also members of the editorial board of Eurosurveillance. Further, as reported by BBC and Google Statistics, on January 21 there were a world total of 6 deaths being attributed to the Wuhan virus. They ask, “Why did the authors assume a challenge for public health laboratories while there was no substantial evidence at that time to indicate that the outbreak was more widespread than initially thought?” Another co-author of the Drosten paper that gave a cover of apparent scientific credibility to the Drosten PCR procedure was head of the company who developed the test being marketed today, with the blessing of WHO, in the hundreds of millions, Olfert Landt (see image), of Tib-Molbiol in Berlin, but Landt did not disclose that pertinent fact in the Drosten paper either.
Certainly nothing suspicious or improper here, or? It would be relevant to know if Drosten, the Merkel chief scientific advisor for COVID-19, Germany’s de facto “Tony Fauci,” gets a percentage for each test sold by Tib-Molbiol in their global marketing agreement with Roche.
False Positives?
Since late January 2020, world mainstream media has inundated us all with frightening hourly updates on “the total number of coronavirus infected.” Usually they simply add each daily increase to a global total of “confirmed cases,” presently over 66 million. Alarming, but for the fact that, as Pieter Borger and his fellow scientific collaborators point out, “confirmed cases” is a nonsense number. Why?
The Borger report identifies what they call “ten fatal problems” in the Drosten paper of last January. Here we take up the most glaring that can easily be grasped by most laypeople.
Drosten & co. gave confusing unspecified primer and probe sequences. The critics note,
“This high number of variants not only is unusual, but it also is highly confusing for laboratories. These six unspecified positions could easily result in the design of several different alternative primer sequences which do not relate to SARS-CoV-2… the confusing unspecific description in the Corman-Drosten paper is not suitable as a Standard Operational Protocol. These unspecified positions should have been designed unequivocally.”
They add that
“RT-PCR is not recommended for primary diagnostics of infection. This is why the RT-PCR Test used in clinical routine for detection of COVID-19 is not indicated for COVID-19 diagnosis on a regulatory basis.”
Amplification Cycles
But even more damning for Drosten is the fact that he mentioned nowhere of a test being positive or negative, or indeed what defines a positive or negative result! The Borger report notes, “These types of virological diagnostic tests must be based on a SOP (Standard Operational Protocol), including a validated and fixed number of PCR cycles (Ct value) after which a sample is deemed positive or negative. The maximum reasonably reliable Ct value is 30 cycles. Above a Ct of 35 cycles, rapidly increasing numbers of false positives must be expected… scientific studies show that only non-infectious (dead) viruses are detected with Ct values of 35.” (emphasis added).
The WHO and Drosten recommend a Ct of 45 cycles and, reportedly, presently the German health officials do as well. Little wonder that as the number of tests is ramped up in the onset of winter flu season, PCR “positives” in Germany and elsewhere explode. As the critical authors point out, were the health authorities to specify 35 cycles maximum, the number of corona positive would be only less than 3% the present number! They note, “an analytical result with a Ct value of 45 is scientifically and diagnostically absolutely meaningless (a reasonable Ct-value should not exceed 30). All this should be communicated very clearly.
It is a significant mistake that the Corman-Drosten paper does not mention the maximum Ct value at which a sample can be unambiguously considered as a positive or a negative test-result. This important cycle threshold limit is also not specified in any follow-up submissions to date.” The authors add,
“The fact that these PCR products have not been validated at molecular level is another striking error of the protocol, making any test based upon it useless as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.” (emphasis added).
In simple English, the entire edifice of the Gates foundation, the Merkel government, the WHO and WEF as well as the case for de facto forced untested vaccines, rests on results of a PCR test for coronavirus that is not worth a hill of beans. The test of Drosten and WHO is, more or less, scientific crap.
Missing Doctor proof too?
This devastating critique from twenty three world leading scientists, including scientists who have patents related to PCR, DNA Isolation and Sequencing, and a former Pfizer Chief Scientist, is damning, but not the only problem Professor Dr. Christian Drosten faces today. He and the officials at Frankfurt’s Goethe University, where he claims to have received his medical doctorate in 2003, are being accused of degree fraud.
According to Dr. Markus Kühbacher, a specialist investigating scientific fraud such as dissertation plagiarism, Dr. Drosten’s doctor thesis, by law must be deposited on a certain date with academic authorities at his University, who then sign a legal form, Revisionsschein, verified with signature, stamp of the University and date, with thesis title and author, to be sent to the University archive. With it, three original copies of the thesis are filed.
Kühbacher charges that the Goethe University is guilty of cover-up by claiming, falsely, Drosten’s Revisionsschein, was on file. The University spokesman later was forced to admit it was not filed, at least not locatable by them. Moreover, of the three mandatory file copies of his doctor thesis, highly relevant given the global importance of Drosten’s coronavirus role, two copies have “disappeared,” and the remaining single copy is water-damaged. Kühbacher says Drosten will now likely face court charges for holding a fraudulent doctoral title.
Whether that comes to pass, it is a fact that a separate legal process has been filed in Berlin against two people responsible for a German media site, Volksverpetzer.de, for slander and defamation, brought by a well-known and critical German medical doctor, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg (pictured). The court case demands of the defendants €250,000 in damages for defamation of character and material damages to Wodarg by the accused in their online site, as well as in other German media, claiming they viciously and without proof, defamed Wodarg, calling him a “covid-denier,” falsely calling him a right-extremist (he is a life-long former parliament member of the Social Democratic Party) and numerous other false and damaging charges.
The attorney for Dr Wodarg is a well-known German-American attorney, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich (ER: pictured below from a story we ran here). In his charges against the defendants, Fuellmich cites in full the charges against the Drosten test for coronavirus of Dr. Pieter Borger et al noted above. This is in effect forcing the defendants to refute the Borger paper. It is a major step on the way to refuting the entire WHO COVID-19 PCR testing fraud. Already an appeals court in Lisbon, Portugal ruled on 11 November that the PCR test of Drosten and WHO was not valid to detect coronavirus infection and that it was no basis to order nationwide or partial lockdowns. (ER:linked to above)
If the stakes were not so deadly for mankind, it would all be material for a comedy of the absurd. The world health Czar, WHO chief Tedros, is no medical doctor whose WHO is financed massively by a college dropout billionaire computer manager, Gates, who also advises the Merkel government on COVID-19 measures.
The Merkel government uses the Drosten PCR test and Drosten himself as an “all-wise” expert to impose the most draconian economic consequences outside wartime. Her Health Minister, Jens Spahn (pictured), is a former banker who has no medical degree, only a stint as a lobbyist for Big Pharma. The head of the German CDC, called the Robert Koch Institute, Lothar Wieler, is not a virologist but an animal doctor, Tierarzt.
With this crew, Germans are seeing their lives destroyed by lockdowns and social measures never before imagined. There is science and then there is science. Not all “science” is valid however.
************
F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook” where this article was originally published.
Featured image inside article: Germany’s leading microbiologist, Professor Christian Drosten, director of the bacteriological and epidemiological research center at Charité Hospital, Berlin. (Photo via New Eastern Outlook)
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com