thelibertybeacon--2020-11-12--How the COVID-19 Vaccine Can … Destroy Your Immune System

How COVID-19 Vaccine Can Destroy Your Immune System According to a study that examined how informed consent is given to COVID-19 vaccine trial participants , disclosure forms fail to inform volunteers that the vaccine might make them susceptible to more severe disease if they ’ re exposed to the virus .
The study,1 “ Informed Consent Disclosure to Vaccine Trial Subjects of Risk of COVID-19 Vaccine Worsening Clinical Disease , ” published in the International Journal of Clinical Practice , October 28 , 2020 , points out that “ COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralizing antibodies may sensitize vaccine recipients @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were not vaccinated.
” “ Vaccines for SARS , MERS and RSV have never been approved , and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern : that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach ( consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralizing antibodies ) , be they composed of protein , viral vector , DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method , may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement ( ADE ) , ” the paper states @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur , obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials .
The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials , as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval , in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.
” As noted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Clinical Practice paper , previous coronavirus vaccine efforts — for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus ( SARS-CoV ) , Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus ( MERS-CoV ) and respiratory syncytial virus ( RSV ) — have revealed a serious concern : The vaccines have a tendency to trigger antibody-dependent enhancement .
What exactly does that mean ?
In a nutshell , it means that rather than enhance your immunity against the infection , the vaccine actually enhances the virus ’ ability to enter and infect your cells , resulting in more severe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This is the exact opposite of what a vaccine is supposed to do , and a significant problem that has been pointed out from the very beginning of this push for a COVID-19 vaccine .
The 2003 review paper “ Antibody-Dependent Enhancement of Virus Infection and Disease ” explains it this way:3 In my May 2020 interview above with Robert Kennedy Jr. , he summarized the history of coronavirus vaccine development , which began in 2002 , following three consecutive SARS outbreaks .
By 2012 , Chinese , American and European scientists were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had about 30 promising candidates .
Of those , the four best vaccine candidates were then given to ferrets , which are the closest analogue to human lung infections .
In the video below , which is a select outtake from my full interview , Kennedy explains what happened next .
While the ferrets displayed robust antibody response , which is the metric used for vaccine licensing , once they were challenged with the wild virus , they all became severely ill and died .
The same thing happened when they tried to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
RSV is an upper respiratory illness that is very similar to that caused by coronaviruses .
At that time , they had decided to skip animal trials and go directly to human trials .
Coronaviruses produce not just one but two different types of antibodies : • Neutralizing antibodies , also referred to as immoglobulin G ( IgG ) antibodies , that fight the infection • Binding antibodies ( also known as nonneutralizing antibodies ) that can not prevent viral infection Instead of preventing viral infection , binding antibodies trigger an abnormal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enhancement.
” Another way to look at this is your immune system is actually backfiring and not functioning to protect you but actually making you worse .
Many of the COVID-19 vaccines currently in the running are using mRNA to instruct your cells to make the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein ( S protein ) .
The spike protein , which is what attaches to the ACE2 receptor of the cell , is the first stage of the two-stage process viruses use to gain entry into cells .
The idea is that by creating the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will commence production of antibodies , without making you sick in the process .
The key question is , which of the two types of antibodies are being produced through this process ?
In an April 2020 Twitter thread,6 The Immunologist noted : “ While developing vaccines … and considering immunity passports , we must first understand the complex role of antibodies in SARS , MERS and COVID-19.
” He goes on to list several coronavirus vaccine studies that have raised concerns about ADE .
The first is a 2017 study7 in PLOS @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Zealand White Rabbits When MERS-CoV Reinfection Occurs in the Absence of Neutralizing Antibody , ” which investigated whether getting infected with MERS would protect the subject against reinfection , as is typically the case with many viral illnesses .
( Meaning , once you recover from a viral infection , say measles , you ’ re immune and won ’ t contract the illness again . )
To determine how MERS affects the immune system , the researchers infected white rabbits with the virus .
The rabbits got sick and developed antibodies , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ kind , meaning the kind of antibodies that block infection .
As a result , they were not protected from reinfection , and when exposed to MERS for a second time , they became ill again , and more severely so .
“ In fact , reinfection resulted in enhanced pulmonary inflammation , without an associated increase in viral RNA titers , ” the authors noted .
Interestingly , neutralizing antibodies were elicited during this second infection , preventing the animals from being infected a third time .
According to the authors : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ does not result in a robust response in neutralizing antibodies , you might be at risk for more severe lung disease if you ’ re infected with the virus .
And here ’ s an important point : COVID-19 vaccines are NOT designed to prevent infection .
As detailed in “ How COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Are Rigged , ” a “ successful ” vaccine merely needs to reduce the severity of the symptoms .
They ’ re not even looking at reducing infection , hospitalization or death rates .
The Dengue virus is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ explained in a Swiss Medical Weekly paper published in April 2020:8 “ The pathogenesis of COVID-19 is currently believed to proceed via both directly cytotoxic and immune-mediated mechanisms .
An additional mechanism facilitating viral cell entry and subsequent damage may involve the so-called antibody-dependent enhancement ( ADE ) .
ADE is a very well-known cascade of events whereby viruses may infect susceptible cells via interaction between virions complexed with antibodies or complement components and , respectively , Fc or complement receptors , leading to the amplification of their replication .
This phenomenon is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ understanding of viral pathogenesis , but also for developing antiviral strategies , notably vaccines … There are four serotypes of Dengue virus , all eliciting protective immunity .
However , although homotypic protection is long-lasting , cross-neutralizing antibodies against different serotypes are short-lived and may last only up to 2 years .
In Dengue fever , reinfection with a different serotype runs a more severe course when the protective antibody titer wanes .
Here , non-neutralizing antibodies take over neutralizing ones , bind to Dengue virions , and these complexes mediate the infection @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fc receptor , in a typical ADE .
In other words , heterotypic antibodies at subneutralizing titres account for ADE in persons infected with a serotype of Dengue virus that is different from the first infection .
Cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies are associated with decreased odds of symptomatic secondary infection , and the higher the titer of such antibodies following the primary infection , the longer the delay to symptomatic secondary infection … ” The paper goes on to detail results from follow-up investigations into the Dengue vaccine , which revealed the hospitalization rate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ age of 9 was greater than the rate among controls .
The explanation for this appears to be that the vaccine mimicked a primary infection , and as that immunity waned , the children became susceptible to ADE when they encountered the virus a second time .
The author explains : This could end up being important for the COVID-19 vaccine .
Hypothetically speaking , if SARS-CoV-2 works like Dengue , which is also caused by an RNA virus , then anyone who has not tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 might actually be at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and only those who have already recovered from a bout of COVID-19 would be protected against severe illness by the vaccine .
To be clear , we do not know whether that is the case or not , but these are important areas of inquiry and the current vaccine trials will simply not be able to answer this important question .
The Swiss Medical Weekly paper9 also reviews the evidence of ADE in coronavirus infections , citing research showing inoculating cats against the feline infectious peritonitis virus ( FIPV ) — a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the disease when challenged with the same FIPV serotype as that in the vaccine .
Experiments have shown immunization with a variety of SARS vaccines resulted in pulmonary immunophathology once challenged with the SARS virus .
The paper also cites research showing “ Antibodies elicited by a SARS-CoV vaccine enhanced infection of B cell lines in spite of protective responses in the hamster model.
” Another paper,10 “ Antibody-Dependent SARS Coronavirus Infection Is Mediated by Antibodies Against Spike Proteins , ” published in 2014 , found that : A study11 that ties into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Insight in 2019 .
Here , macaques vaccinated with a modified vaccinia Ankara ( MVA ) virus encoding full-length SARS-CoV spike protein ended up with more severe lung pathology when the animals were exposed to the SARS virus .
And , when they transferred anti-spike IgG antibodies into unvaccinated macaques , they developed acute diffuse alveolar damage , likely by “ skewing the inflammation-resolving response.
” An interesting 2012 paper12 with the telling title , “ Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ namely that COVID-19 vaccines may end up making people more prone to severe SARS-CoV-2 infection .
The paper reviews experiments showing immunization with a variety of SARS vaccines resulted in pulmonary immunophathology once challenged with the SARS virus .
As noted by the authors:13 “ Inactivated whole virus vaccines whether inactivated with formalin or beta propiolactone and whether given with our without alum adjuvant exhibited a Th2-type immunopathologic in lungs after challenge .
As indicated , two reports attributed the immunopathology to presence of the N protein in the vaccine ; however , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ animals given S protein vaccine only , although it appeared to be of lesser intensity .
Thus , a Th2-type immunopathologic reaction on challenge of vaccinated animals has occurred in three of four animal models ( not in hamsters ) including two different inbred mouse strains with four different types of SARS-CoV vaccines with and without alum adjuvant .
An inactivated vaccine preparation that does not induce this result in mice , ferrets and nonhuman primates has not been reported .
This combined experience provides concern for trials with SARS-CoV vaccines in humans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have been conducted and reported to induce antibody responses and to be ‘ safe.
’ However , the evidence for safety is for a short period of observation .
The concern arising from the present report is for an immunopathologic reaction occurring among vaccinated individuals on exposure to infectious SARS-CoV , the basis for developing a vaccine for SARS .
Additional safety concerns relate to effectiveness and safety against antigenic variants of SARS-CoV and for safety of vaccinated persons exposed to other coronaviruses , particularly those of the type 2 group.
” The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ top of all of these concerns , there ’ s evidence showing the elderly — who are most vulnerable to severe COVID-19 — are also the most vulnerable to ADE .
Preliminary research findings14 posted on the preprint server medRxiv at the end of March 2020 reported that middle-aged and elderly COVID-19 patients have far higher levels of anti-spike antibodies — which , again , increase infectivity — than younger patients .
Another paper worth mentioning is the May 2020 mini review15 “ Impact of Immune Enhancement on COVID-19 Polyclonal Hyperimmune Globulin Therapy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other papers , the authors point out that:16 Do a Risk-Benefit Analysis Before Making Up Your Mind In all likelihood , regardless of how effective ( or ineffective ) the COVID-19 vaccines end up being , they ’ ll be released to the public in relatively short order .
Most predict one or more vaccines will be ready sometime in 2021 .
Ironically , the data17,18,19 we now have no longer support a mass vaccination mandate , considering the lethality of COVID-19 is lower than the flu for those under the age of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ age of 40 , your risk of dying from COVID-19 is just 0.01 % , meaning you have a 99.99 % chance of surviving the infection .
And you could improve that to 99.999 % if you ’ re metabolically flexible and vitamin D replete .
So , really , what are we protecting against with a COVID-19 vaccine ?
As mentioned , the vaccines aren ’ t even designed to prevent infection , only reduce the severity of symptoms .
Meanwhile , they could potentially make you sicker once you ’ re @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like a lot of risk for a truly questionable benefit .
To circle back to where we started , participants in current COVID-19 vaccine trials are not being told of this risk — that by getting the vaccine they may end up with more severe COVID-19 once they ’ re infected with the virus .
In closing , consider what this PNAS news feature states about the risk of vaccine-induced immune enhancement and dysfunction , particularly for the elderly , the very people who would need the protection a vaccine might offer the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of vaccine candidates for diseases such as dengue , respiratory syncytial virus ( RSV ) , and severe acute respiratory syndrome ( SARS ) have shown a paradoxical phenomenon : Some animals or people who received the vaccine and were later exposed to the virus developed more severe disease than those who had not been vaccinated .
The vaccine-primed immune system , in certain cases , seemed to launch a shoddy response to the natural infection … This immune backfiring , or so-called immune enhancement , may manifest in different ways such as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ process in which a virus leverages antibodies to aid infection ; or cell-based enhancement , a category that includes allergic inflammation caused by Th2 immunopathology .
In some cases , the enhancement processes might overlap … Some researchers argue that although ADE has received the most attention to date , it is less likely than the other immune enhancement pathways to cause a dysregulated response to COVID-19 , given what is known about the epidemiology of the virus and its behavior in the human body .
‘ There is the potential for ADE @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Th2 immunopathology , ’ says Ralph Baric , an epidemiologist and expert in coronaviruses … at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill .
In previous studies of SARS , aged mice were found to have particularly high risks of life-threatening Th2 immunopathology … in which a faulty T cell response triggers allergic inflammation , and poorly functional antibodies that form immune complexes , activating the complement system and potentially damaging the airways .
”

How COVID-19 Vaccine Can Destroy Your Immune System
Analysis by: Dr. Joseph Mercola
According to a study that examined how informed consent is given to COVID-19 vaccine trial participants, disclosure forms fail to inform volunteers that the vaccine might make them susceptible to more severe disease if they’re exposed to the virus.
The study,1 “Informed Consent Disclosure to Vaccine Trial Subjects of Risk of COVID-19 Vaccine Worsening Clinical Disease,” published in the International Journal of Clinical Practice, October 28, 2020, points out that “COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralizing antibodies may sensitize vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated.”
“Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralizing antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE),” the paper states. “This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials. The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.”
What Is Antibody-Dependent Enhancement?
As noted by the authors of that International Journal of Clinical Practice paper, previous coronavirus vaccine efforts — for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) — have revealed a serious concern: The vaccines have a tendency to trigger antibody-dependent enhancement.
What exactly does that mean? In a nutshell, it means that rather than enhance your immunity against the infection, the vaccine actually enhances the virus’ ability to enter and infect your cells, resulting in more severe disease than had you not been vaccinated.2
This is the exact opposite of what a vaccine is supposed to do, and a significant problem that has been pointed out from the very beginning of this push for a COVID-19 vaccine. The 2003 review paper “Antibody-Dependent Enhancement of Virus Infection and Disease” explains it this way:3
“In general, virus-specific antibodies are considered antiviral and play an important role in the control of virus infections in a number of ways. However, in some instances, the presence of specific antibodies can be beneficial to the virus. This activity is known as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of virus infection. The ADE of virus infection is a phenomenon in which virus-specific antibodies enhance the entry of virus, and in some cases the replication of virus, into monocytes/macrophages and granulocytic cells through interaction with Fc and/or complement receptors. This phenomenon has been reported in vitro and in vivo for viruses representing numerous families and genera of public health and veterinary importance. These viruses share some common features such as preferential replication in macrophages, ability to establish persistence, and antigenic diversity. For some viruses, ADE of infection has become a great concern to disease control by vaccination.”
Previous Coronavirus Vaccine Efforts Have All Failed
In my May 2020 interview above with Robert Kennedy Jr., he summarized the history of coronavirus vaccine development, which began in 2002, following three consecutive SARS outbreaks. By 2012, Chinese, American and European scientists were working on SARS vaccine development, and had about 30 promising candidates.
Of those, the four best vaccine candidates were then given to ferrets, which are the closest analogue to human lung infections. In the video below, which is a select outtake from my full interview, Kennedy explains what happened next. While the ferrets displayed robust antibody response, which is the metric used for vaccine licensing, once they were challenged with the wild virus, they all became severely ill and died.
The same thing happened when they tried to develop an RSV vaccine in the 1960s. RSV is an upper respiratory illness that is very similar to that caused by coronaviruses. At that time, they had decided to skip animal trials and go directly to human trials.
“They tested it on I think about 35 children, and the same thing happened,” Kennedy said. “The children developed a champion antibody response — robust, durable. It looked perfect [but when] the children were exposed to the wild virus, they all became sick. Two of them died. They abandoned the vaccine. It was a big embarrassment to FDA and NIH.”
Neutralizing Versus Binding Antibodies
Coronaviruses produce not just one but two different types of antibodies:
Neutralizing antibodies, 4 also referred to as immoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies, that fight the infection
also referred to as immoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies, that fight the infection Binding antibodies 5 (also known as nonneutralizing antibodies) that cannot prevent viral infection
Instead of preventing viral infection, binding antibodies trigger an abnormal immune response known as “paradoxical immune enhancement.” Another way to look at this is your immune system is actually backfiring and not functioning to protect you but actually making you worse.
Many of the COVID-19 vaccines currently in the running are using mRNA to instruct your cells to make the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S protein). The spike protein, which is what attaches to the ACE2 receptor of the cell, is the first stage of the two-stage process viruses use to gain entry into cells.
The idea is that by creating the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, your immune system will commence production of antibodies, without making you sick in the process. The key question is, which of the two types of antibodies are being produced through this process?
Without Neutralizing Antibodies, Expect More Severe Illness
In an April 2020 Twitter thread,6 The Immunologist noted: “While developing vaccines … and considering immunity passports, we must first understand the complex role of antibodies in SARS, MERS and COVID-19.” He goes on to list several coronavirus vaccine studies that have raised concerns about ADE.
The first is a 2017 study7 in PLOS Pathogens, ”Enhanced Inflammation in New Zealand White Rabbits When MERS-CoV Reinfection Occurs in the Absence of Neutralizing Antibody,” which investigated whether getting infected with MERS would protect the subject against reinfection, as is typically the case with many viral illnesses. (Meaning, once you recover from a viral infection, say measles, you’re immune and won’t contract the illness again.)
To determine how MERS affects the immune system, the researchers infected white rabbits with the virus. The rabbits got sick and developed antibodies, but those antibodies were not the neutralizing kind, meaning the kind of antibodies that block infection. As a result, they were not protected from reinfection, and when exposed to MERS for a second time, they became ill again, and more severely so.
“In fact, reinfection resulted in enhanced pulmonary inflammation, without an associated increase in viral RNA titers,” the authors noted. Interestingly, neutralizing antibodies were elicited during this second infection, preventing the animals from being infected a third time. According to the authors:
“Our data from the rabbit model suggests that people exposed to MERS-CoV who fail to develop a neutralizing antibody response, or persons whose neutralizing antibody titers have waned, may be at risk for severe lung disease on re-exposure to MERS-CoV.”
In other words, if the vaccine does not result in a robust response in neutralizing antibodies, you might be at risk for more severe lung disease if you’re infected with the virus.
And here’s an important point: COVID-19 vaccines are NOT designed to prevent infection. As detailed in “How COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Are Rigged,” a “successful” vaccine merely needs to reduce the severity of the symptoms. They’re not even looking at reducing infection, hospitalization or death rates.
ADE in Dengue Infections
The Dengue virus is also known to cause ADE. As explained in a Swiss Medical Weekly paper published in April 2020:8
“The pathogenesis of COVID-19 is currently believed to proceed via both directly cytotoxic and immune-mediated mechanisms. An additional mechanism facilitating viral cell entry and subsequent damage may involve the so-called antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). ADE is a very well-known cascade of events whereby viruses may infect susceptible cells via interaction between virions complexed with antibodies or complement components and, respectively, Fc or complement receptors, leading to the amplification of their replication. This phenomenon is of enormous relevance not only for the understanding of viral pathogenesis, but also for developing antiviral strategies, notably vaccines … There are four serotypes of Dengue virus, all eliciting protective immunity. However, although homotypic protection is long-lasting, cross-neutralizing antibodies against different serotypes are short-lived and may last only up to 2 years. In Dengue fever, reinfection with a different serotype runs a more severe course when the protective antibody titer wanes. Here, non-neutralizing antibodies take over neutralizing ones, bind to Dengue virions, and these complexes mediate the infection of phagocytic cells via interaction with the Fc receptor, in a typical ADE. In other words, heterotypic antibodies at subneutralizing titres account for ADE in persons infected with a serotype of Dengue virus that is different from the first infection. Cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies are associated with decreased odds of symptomatic secondary infection, and the higher the titer of such antibodies following the primary infection, the longer the delay to symptomatic secondary infection …”
The paper goes on to detail results from follow-up investigations into the Dengue vaccine, which revealed the hospitalization rate for Dengue among vaccinated children under the age of 9 was greater than the rate among controls. The explanation for this appears to be that the vaccine mimicked a primary infection, and as that immunity waned, the children became susceptible to ADE when they encountered the virus a second time. The author explains:
“A post hoc analysis of efficacy trials, using an anti-nonstructural protein 1 immunoglobulin G (IgG) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to distinguish antibodies elicited by wild-type infection from those following vaccination, showed that the vaccine was able to protect against severe Dengue [in] those who had been exposed to the natural infection before vaccination, and that the risk of severe clinical outcome was increased among seronegative persons. Based on this, a Strategic Advisor Group of Experts convened by World Health Organization (WHO) concluded that only Dengue seropositive persons should be vaccinated whenever Dengue control programs are planned that include vaccination.”
ADE in Coronavirus Infections
This could end up being important for the COVID-19 vaccine. Hypothetically speaking, if SARS-CoV-2 works like Dengue, which is also caused by an RNA virus, then anyone who has not tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 might actually be at increased risk for severe COVID-19 after vaccination, and only those who have already recovered from a bout of COVID-19 would be protected against severe illness by the vaccine.
To be clear, we do not know whether that is the case or not, but these are important areas of inquiry and the current vaccine trials will simply not be able to answer this important question.
The Swiss Medical Weekly paper9 also reviews the evidence of ADE in coronavirus infections, citing research showing inoculating cats against the feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV) — a feline coronavirus — increases the severity of the disease when challenged with the same FIPV serotype as that in the vaccine.
Experiments have shown immunization with a variety of SARS vaccines resulted in pulmonary immunophathology once challenged with the SARS virus.
The paper also cites research showing “Antibodies elicited by a SARS-CoV vaccine enhanced infection of B cell lines in spite of protective responses in the hamster model.” Another paper,10 “Antibody-Dependent SARS Coronavirus Infection Is Mediated by Antibodies Against Spike Proteins,” published in 2014, found that:
“… higher concentrations of anti-sera against SARS-CoV neutralized SARS-CoV infection, while highly diluted anti-sera significantly increased SARS-CoV infection and induced higher levels of apoptosis. Results from infectivity assays indicate that SARS-CoV ADE is primarily mediated by diluted antibodies against envelope spike proteins rather than nucleocapsid proteins. We also generated monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV spike proteins and observed that most of them promoted SARS-CoV infection. Combined, our results suggest that antibodies against SARS-CoV spike proteins may trigger ADE effects. The data raise new questions regarding a potential SARS-CoV vaccine …”
A study11 that ties into this was published in the journal JCI Insight in 2019. Here, macaques vaccinated with a modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) virus encoding full-length SARS-CoV spike protein ended up with more severe lung pathology when the animals were exposed to the SARS virus. And, when they transferred anti-spike IgG antibodies into unvaccinated macaques, they developed acute diffuse alveolar damage, likely by “skewing the inflammation-resolving response.”
SARS Vaccine Worsens Infection After Challenge With SARS-CoV
An interesting 2012 paper12 with the telling title, “Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus,” demonstrates what many researchers now fear, namely that COVID-19 vaccines may end up making people more prone to severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.
The paper reviews experiments showing immunization with a variety of SARS vaccines resulted in pulmonary immunophathology once challenged with the SARS virus. As noted by the authors:13
“Inactivated whole virus vaccines whether inactivated with formalin or beta propiolactone and whether given with our without alum adjuvant exhibited a Th2-type immunopathologic in lungs after challenge. As indicated, two reports attributed the immunopathology to presence of the N protein in the vaccine; however, we found the same immunopathologic reaction in animals given S protein vaccine only, although it appeared to be of lesser intensity. Thus, a Th2-type immunopathologic reaction on challenge of vaccinated animals has occurred in three of four animal models (not in hamsters) including two different inbred mouse strains with four different types of SARS-CoV vaccines with and without alum adjuvant. An inactivated vaccine preparation that does not induce this result in mice, ferrets and nonhuman primates has not been reported. This combined experience provides concern for trials with SARS-CoV vaccines in humans. Clinical trials with SARS coronavirus vaccines have been conducted and reported to induce antibody responses and to be ‘safe.’ However, the evidence for safety is for a short period of observation. The concern arising from the present report is for an immunopathologic reaction occurring among vaccinated individuals on exposure to infectious SARS-CoV, the basis for developing a vaccine for SARS. Additional safety concerns relate to effectiveness and safety against antigenic variants of SARS-CoV and for safety of vaccinated persons exposed to other coronaviruses, particularly those of the type 2 group.”
The Elderly Are Most Vulnerable to ADE
On top of all of these concerns, there’s evidence showing the elderly — who are most vulnerable to severe COVID-19 — are also the most vulnerable to ADE. Preliminary research findings14 posted on the preprint server medRxiv at the end of March 2020 reported that middle-aged and elderly COVID-19 patients have far higher levels of anti-spike antibodies — which, again, increase infectivity — than younger patients.
Immune Enhancement Is a Serious Concern
Another paper worth mentioning is the May 2020 mini review15 “Impact of Immune Enhancement on COVID-19 Polyclonal Hyperimmune Globulin Therapy and Vaccine Development.” As in many other papers, the authors point out that:16
“While development of both hyperimmune globulin therapy and vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 are promising, they both pose a common theoretical safety concern. Experimental studies have suggested the possibility of immune-enhanced disease of SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV infections, which may thus similarly occur with SARS-CoV-2 infection … Immune enhancement of disease can theoretically occur in two ways. Firstly, non-neutralizing or sub-neutralizing levels of antibodies can enhance SARS-CoV-2 infection into target cells. Secondly, antibodies could enhance inflammation and hence severity of pulmonary disease. An overview of these antibody dependent infection and immunopathology enhancement effects are summarized in Fig. 1 … Currently, there are multiple SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV vaccine candidates in pre-clinical or early phase clinical trials. Animal studies on these CoVs have shown that the spike (S) protein-based vaccines (specifically the receptor binding domain, RBD) are highly immunogenic and protective against wild-type CoV challenge. Vaccines that target other parts of the virus, such as the nucleocapsid, without the S protein, have shown no protection against CoV infection and increased lung pathology. However, immunization with some S protein based CoV vaccines have also displayed signs of enhanced lung pathology following challenge. Hence, besides the choice of antigen target, vaccine efficacy and risk of immunopathology may be dependent on other ancillary factors, including adjuvant formulation, age at vaccination … and route of immunization.”
Figure 1: Mechanism of ADE and antibody mediated immunopathology. Left panel: For ADE, immune complex internalization is mediated by the engagement of activating Fc receptors on the cell surface. Co-ligation of inhibitory receptors then results in the inhibition of antiviral responses which leads to increased viral replication. Right panel: Antibodies can cause immunopathology by activating the complement pathway or antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). For both pathways, excessive immune activation results in the release of cytokines and chemokines, leading to enhanced disease pathology.
Do a Risk-Benefit Analysis Before Making Up Your Mind
In all likelihood, regardless of how effective (or ineffective) the COVID-19 vaccines end up being, they’ll be released to the public in relatively short order. Most predict one or more vaccines will be ready sometime in 2021.
Ironically, the data17,18,19 we now have no longer support a mass vaccination mandate, considering the lethality of COVID-19 is lower than the flu for those under the age of 60.20 If you’re under the age of 40, your risk of dying from COVID-19 is just 0.01%, meaning you have a 99.99% chance of surviving the infection. And you could improve that to 99.999% if you’re metabolically flexible and vitamin D replete.
So, really, what are we protecting against with a COVID-19 vaccine? As mentioned, the vaccines aren’t even designed to prevent infection, only reduce the severity of symptoms. Meanwhile, they could potentially make you sicker once you’re exposed to the virus. That seems like a lot of risk for a truly questionable benefit.
To circle back to where we started, participants in current COVID-19 vaccine trials are not being told of this risk — that by getting the vaccine they may end up with more severe COVID-19 once they’re infected with the virus.
Lethal Th2 Immunopathology Is Another Potential Risk
In closing, consider what this PNAS news feature states about the risk of vaccine-induced immune enhancement and dysfunction, particularly for the elderly, the very people who would need the protection a vaccine might offer the most:21
“Since the 1960s, tests of vaccine candidates for diseases such as dengue, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) have shown a paradoxical phenomenon: Some animals or people who received the vaccine and were later exposed to the virus developed more severe disease than those who had not been vaccinated. The vaccine-primed immune system, in certain cases, seemed to launch a shoddy response to the natural infection … This immune backfiring, or so-called immune enhancement, may manifest in different ways such as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), a process in which a virus leverages antibodies to aid infection; or cell-based enhancement, a category that includes allergic inflammation caused by Th2 immunopathology. In some cases, the enhancement processes might overlap … Some researchers argue that although ADE has received the most attention to date, it is less likely than the other immune enhancement pathways to cause a dysregulated response to COVID-19, given what is known about the epidemiology of the virus and its behavior in the human body. ‘There is the potential for ADE, but the bigger problem is probably Th2 immunopathology,’ says Ralph Baric, an epidemiologist and expert in coronaviruses … at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. In previous studies of SARS, aged mice were found to have particularly high risks of life-threatening Th2 immunopathology … in which a faulty T cell response triggers allergic inflammation, and poorly functional antibodies that form immune complexes, activating the complement system and potentially damaging the airways.”
••••
Sources and References:
••••
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-12--De Blasio’s Daughter: Biden “Was Able to Steal” Election [Video]

De Blasio ’ s Daughter in Verbal Slip Up , Claims Biden “ Was Able to Steal ” Election [ New York ] Mayor De Blasio ’ s daughter was caught in an embarrassing on camera verbal slip up when she told an interviewer that Joe Biden “ was able to steal ” the election .
There were in fact two major gaffes , with Chiara de Blasio initially telling the interviewer how happy she was that “ now we have the first black Asian female president in office elected , ” referring to Kamala Harris .
Harris would of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s win is certified , although many have suggested that she could soon find herself in the Oval Office given Biden ’ s declining cognitive abilities .
De Blasio followed up by saying that Biden stole the election , before correcting herself .
“ Joe Biden was able to steal…steal no , was able to win , ” she said before apologizing .
Given what happened , maybe de Blasio was right the first time .
The 25-year-old has become a prominent left-wing activist and she was arrested back in May during a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ published this article from Summit News as written by Paul Joseph Watson .
New limited edition merch now available !
Click here .
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch .
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here .
Also , I urgently need your financial support here .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

De Blasio’s Daughter in Verbal Slip Up, Claims Biden “Was Able to Steal” Election
Bill de Blasio’s daughter says Joe Biden stole the election & Kamala is the first female President Whoops…
Paul Joseph Watson
Pacific Press/Getty Images
[New York] Mayor De Blasio’s daughter was caught in an embarrassing on camera verbal slip up when she told an interviewer that Joe Biden “was able to steal” the election.
There were in fact two major gaffes, with Chiara de Blasio initially telling the interviewer how happy she was that “now we have the first black Asian female president in office elected,” referring to Kamala Harris.
Harris would of course become Vice President if Biden’s win is certified, although many have suggested that she could soon find herself in the Oval Office given Biden’s declining cognitive abilities.
This is Mayor De Blasio’s daughter in New York… and I’m the lady in the yellow hat 👒 pic.twitter.com/0iY99PDHBS — Angela Stanton King 🇺🇸 (@theangiestanton) November 10, 2020
De Blasio followed up by saying that Biden stole the election, before correcting herself.
“Joe Biden was able to steal…steal no, was able to win,” she said before apologizing.
Given what happened, maybe de Blasio was right the first time.
The 25-year-old has become a prominent left-wing activist and she was arrested back in May during a George Floyd protest.
*********
(TLB) published this article from Summit News as written by Paul Joseph Watson.
A note from PJW New limited edition merch now available! Click here. In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch. I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here. Also, I urgently need your financial support here.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-12--Concede Nothing … Because There IS No ‘President-Elect’ Yet

Concede Nothing — There IS No ‘ President-Elect ’ Yet The media continue to build upon the shaky foundation they poured on Saturday when they prematurely called the 2020 Presidential Election for Joe Biden .
Rising from the traditional “ nothing to see here ” to the admonishing “ all votes have been counted ” and ultimately to Whoopi Goldberg ’ s incendiary “ suck it up , ” it seems clear that the plan is to make the election over simply because they say the election is over .
And , despite Hillary ’ s strong suggestion that Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the mask-muffled screams from Trump-haters of all persuasions demand that the president accept that Election 2020 is over and concede that he ’ s lost .
Lost , believe it or not , to a bumbling , poorly scripted automaton in the throes of rapidly creeping dementia .
Except that it ’ s not over .
Not by a long-shot .
Not with ongoing ballot counting in key states , a fast-growing number of serious legal challenges pending in previously “ called ” states and an even faster-growing number of sworn ( under @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it ’ s not .
And more to the point , it ’ s not over until at least 71 million Trump-voting Americans ( that we know of ) who have every reason to smell yet another big fat Democrat Rat have been at least somewhat convinced it ’ s over .
Not by dismissive acceptance speeches or talk of transition teams and task forces and ridiculous cabinet choices from Joe Biden .
Not by the celebratory dancing of blathering woke-parvenus playing endless games of virtue-signal-tag in the playground of social media .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , dished out in helpings of very viable responses to very viable accusations of widespread systemic election fraud .
Accusations which continue to grow in number , scale , variety and , most importantly , credibility .
In just the past few days , fresh news stories of widespread and wide-ranging vote-rigging schemes , particularly in vital swing-states , have broken as fast as Pro-Joe Media can ignore them and Twitter can block them .
To name just a few , I offer ballot-scanner misreads and software “ glitches , ” all miraculously @ @ @ @ @ @ @ well as dozens ( and growing ) of sworn affidavits by eyewitnesses of magically appearing Biden ballots and mysteriously disappearing Trump ballots , often at the hands of corrupt election officials .
Speaking of whom , have you heard the story of Richard Hopkins , a Pennsylvania postal employee who blew the whistle on Postmaster Rob Weisenbach ’ s order to backdate late ballots to Nov. 3 ?
News of Hopkins ’ s conversations with federal investigators apparently prompted the WaPo to publish a hit-piece on him , wrongfully claiming he had recanted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ [ video ] .
In a word : Wow .
And there ’ s more : More late ballot backdating , more mass-voter-fraud by Detroit officials , fabricated proof of residence data for illegal and deceased voters , sudden huge swaps in county Trump and Biden tallies , apparently by intentional injection , and even an alleged link between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ( D-Calif. ) , Sen. Dianne Feinstein ( D-Calif. ) and the company responsible for the data-manipulating voting machines , which have added hundreds of thousands of bogus Biden votes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ here , here and here ) .
These incredibly credible whistleblower reports continue to roll in , adding further evidence to the attempted coup and substance to the lawsuits ahead .
Team Trump got that ball rolling on Monday , filing a lawsuit [ PDF ] in Pennsylvania seeking an emergency injunction to stop officials from certifying Joe Biden ’ s victory due to “ potentially fraudulent votes being counted without proper verification or oversight.
” Trump spokespeople have promised a slew of similar filings , and , given the recent increased inflow @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s little reason to doubt them .
Yet , by far the strongest of Team Trump ’ s court challenges is not one of voter fraud , but rather judicial fraud .
In March of this year , the 5-to-2 Democrat Pennsylvania Supreme Court bowed to leftist pressure and , purportedly in response to COVID-19 , extended the mail-in ballot deadline by an arbitrary three full days .
Not due to ambiguities or unconstitutionality , as is usually the case , but simply because after declaring coronavirus a “ natural disaster , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out the existing law and write a new one , effectively changing election day in Pennsylvania .
This one will surely be re-decided quickly by the Supreme Court .
SCOTUS had previously passed on the case by a 4-4 pre-Amy Coney Barrett vote , a decision so outrageously bad that one intrepid Justice , Samuel Alito , broke with tradition by making it his personal project to revisit it after the election .
Indeed , this one will most certainly go Trump ’ s way .
So what impact will these allegations , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and favorably adjudicated lawsuits , have on who resides at 1600 Penn for the next 4 years ?
Check this out .
As of this writing ( 11/11/2020 02:00 EST ) Real Clear Politics has NOT called Pennsylvania or awarded its 20 votes to anyone , media reports to the contrary notwithstanding .
Nor Alaska ( 3 ) , North Carolina ( 15 ) , Georgia ( 16 ) or Arizona ( 11 ) – All too close to call .
In fact , the renowned and highly respected aggregator of election statistics @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 270 required to substantiate the dubious title of “ president elect ” he ’ s been bestowed .
Indeed , until all votes are not only counted but also verified ( and State certified ) , there is no president-elect .
Sure , Sleepy Joe can call himself whatever floats his boat , be it Joe , Jill , or , during particularly demented moments , even Hunter .
And so long as the media dutifully parrot his choice , he can lay claim to whatever title his demented mind desires , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ votes , why not do some vote counting of your own – electoral votes that is ?
RCP has Trump at 214 and Biden at 259 .
270 wins ; winner takes it all .
65 votes still up for grabs .
Oh , and Michigan , which was called blue , has 16 .
Any guesses why I mention that ?
Heads exploded everywhere on Monday when Secretary of State Mike Pompeo responded to an impudent question about his employees ’ preparations to engage with Joe Biden ’ s transition team by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will be a smooth transfer of power … to a second Trump administration.
” How dare he suggest it ’ s not over and that Trump may still emerge the victor ?
Did that smile suggest he knows something we don ’ t ?
The above article ( Concede Nothing — There IS No ‘ President-Elect ’ Yet ) was created and published by American Thinker and is republished here under “ Fair Use ” ( see our posted disclaimer below ) with attribution to the articles author Marc Sheppard and americanthinker.com .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ more great articles and information .
About the articles Author : Marc Sheppard is a data analyst , software engineer , and writer .
He ’ s been a frequent contributor to American Thinker and welcomes your feedback .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

Concede Nothing — There IS No ‘President-Elect’ Yet
By: Marc Sheppard
The media continue to build upon the shaky foundation they poured on Saturday when they prematurely called the 2020 Presidential Election for Joe Biden. Rising from the traditional “nothing to see here” to the admonishing “all votes have been counted” and ultimately to Whoopi Goldberg’s incendiary “suck it up,” it seems clear that the plan is to make the election over simply because they say the election is over.
And, despite Hillary’s strong suggestion that Biden not do so under any circumstances, the mask-muffled screams from Trump-haters of all persuasions demand that the president accept that Election 2020 is over and concede that he’s lost. Lost, believe it or not, to a bumbling, poorly scripted automaton in the throes of rapidly creeping dementia.
Except that it’s not over. Not by a long-shot.
Not with ongoing ballot counting in key states, a fast-growing number of serious legal challenges pending in previously “called” states and an even faster-growing number of sworn (under penalty of perjury) fraud allegations, it’s not.
And more to the point, it’s not over until at least 71 million Trump-voting Americans (that we know of) who have every reason to smell yet another big fat Democrat Rat have been at least somewhat convinced it’s over. Not by dismissive acceptance speeches or talk of transition teams and task forces and ridiculous cabinet choices from Joe Biden. Not by the celebratory dancing of blathering woke-parvenus playing endless games of virtue-signal-tag in the playground of social media.
But rather by reasonable and irrefutable facts, dished out in helpings of very viable responses to very viable accusations of widespread systemic election fraud. Accusations which continue to grow in number, scale, variety and, most importantly, credibility.
In just the past few days, fresh news stories of widespread and wide-ranging vote-rigging schemes, particularly in vital swing-states, have broken as fast as Pro-Joe Media can ignore them and Twitter can block them. To name just a few, I offer ballot-scanner misreads and software “glitches,” all miraculously changing Trump votes to Biden votes as well as dozens (and growing) of sworn affidavits by eyewitnesses of magically appearing Biden ballots and mysteriously disappearing Trump ballots, often at the hands of corrupt election officials.
Speaking of whom, have you heard the story of Richard Hopkins, a Pennsylvania postal employee who blew the whistle on Postmaster Rob Weisenbach’s order to backdate late ballots to Nov. 3? News of Hopkins’s conversations with federal investigators apparently prompted the WaPo to publish a hit-piece on him, wrongfully claiming he had recanted his allegations — something he fervently denies [video]. In a word: Wow.
And there’s more: More late ballot backdating, more mass-voter-fraud by Detroit officials, fabricated proof of residence data for illegal and deceased voters, sudden huge swaps in county Trump and Biden tallies, apparently by intentional injection, and even an alleged link between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and the company responsible for the data-manipulating voting machines, which have added hundreds of thousands of bogus Biden votes nationwide (See here, here, here, here and here).
These incredibly credible whistleblower reports continue to roll in, adding further evidence to the attempted coup and substance to the lawsuits ahead.
Team Trump got that ball rolling on Monday, filing a lawsuit [PDF] in Pennsylvania seeking an emergency injunction to stop officials from certifying Joe Biden’s victory due to “potentially fraudulent votes being counted without proper verification or oversight.”
Trump spokespeople have promised a slew of similar filings, and, given the recent increased inflow of sworn voter fraud complaints, there’s little reason to doubt them.
Yet, by far the strongest of Team Trump’s court challenges is not one of voter fraud, but rather judicial fraud. In March of this year, the 5-to-2 Democrat Pennsylvania Supreme Court bowed to leftist pressure and, purportedly in response to COVID-19, extended the mail-in ballot deadline by an arbitrary three full days. Not due to ambiguities or unconstitutionality, as is usually the case, but simply because after declaring coronavirus a “natural disaster,” they felt empowered to just throw out the existing law and write a new one, effectively changing election day in Pennsylvania.
This one will surely be re-decided quickly by the Supreme Court. SCOTUS had previously passed on the case by a 4-4 pre-Amy Coney Barrett vote, a decision so outrageously bad that one intrepid Justice, Samuel Alito, broke with tradition by making it his personal project to revisit it after the election. Indeed, this one will most certainly go Trump’s way.
So what impact will these allegations, sworn or not, together with well-targeted and favorably adjudicated lawsuits, have on who resides at 1600 Penn for the next 4 years? Check this out.
As of this writing (11/11/2020 02:00 EST) Real Clear Politics has NOT called Pennsylvania or awarded its 20 votes to anyone, media reports to the contrary notwithstanding. Nor Alaska (3), North Carolina (15), Georgia(16) or Arizona (11) – All too close to call. In fact, the renowned and highly respected aggregator of election statistics has Biden 11 electoral votes short of the 270 required to substantiate the dubious title of “president elect” he’s been bestowed. Indeed, until all votes are not only counted but also verified (and State certified), there is no president-elect. Sure, Sleepy Joe can call himself whatever floats his boat, be it Joe, Jill, or, during particularly demented moments, even Hunter. And so long as the media dutifully parrot his choice, he can lay claim to whatever title his demented mind desires, including president-elect. And speaking of counting votes, why not do some vote counting of your own – electoral votes that is? RCP has Trump at 214 and Biden at 259. 270 wins; winner takes it all. 65 votes still up for grabs. Oh, and Michigan, which was called blue, has 16. Any guesses why I mention that? Heads exploded everywhere on Monday when Secretary of State Mike Pompeo responded to an impudent question about his employees’ preparations to engage with Joe Biden’s transition team by declaring with a smile, “There will be a smooth transfer of power … to a second Trump administration.” How dare he suggest it’s not over and that Trump may still emerge the victor? Did that smile suggest he knows something we don’t? Finish the math yet? •••• The above article (Concede Nothing — There IS No ‘President-Elect’ Yet) was created and published by American Thinker and is republished here under “Fair Use” (see our posted disclaimer below) with attribution to the articles author Marc Sheppard and americanthinker.com. TLB recommends you visit American Thinker for more great articles and information. About the articles Author: Marc Sheppard is a data analyst, software engineer, and writer. He’s been a frequent contributor to American Thinker and welcomes your feedback. •••• •••• Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-12--“A Vaccine For The Rich” – Pfizer’s COVID-19 Jab Almost Impossible To Distribute In Poorer Countries

A logistical “ roadmap ” from Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical has been released showing the staggering logistical feats required to transport and store the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine , which has just been christened by Bloomberg as “ the vaccine of the rich ” .
Offering some more insight into details that have been the subject of much speculation on Wall Street , Bloomberg reported on this “ complex and costly ” private network that companies are building to help distribute vaccines like Pfizer ’ s mRNA vaccine ( a technology that ’ s also being used by another leading candidate , Moderna @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has finally been approved .
Countries that don ’ t already have these networks will need to build them from scratch if they wish to substantially reduce the supply bottleneck , which would be “ a herculean task ” .
That means that countries will need to build from scratch the deep-freeze production , storage and transportation networks needed for the vaccine to survive .
This massive investment and coordination required all but guarantees that only rich nations will manage to dial up access , with the wealthy first in line to receive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gates have invested plenty of time on a PR campaign warning that access to the vaccine must be made ‘ universal ’ – that is , extended to all of earth ’ s 7.7 billion people – or humanity won ’ t manage to eradicate COVID-19 .
Together , they ’ ve backed a project called ‘ Covax ’ which aims to raise $ 18 billion to pay for vaccines for poorer countries .
But even once they ’ ve been paid for , the task remains : how can we physically ship @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
The massive expense of the infrastructure investment means many of these poorer countries are now faced with a difficult choice : invest in the supply network , even before the vaccines have been approved , and take a risk should unforeseen complications arise , or wait to see how everything pans out for the developed world , sacrificing valuable time .
Many of these economies could simply wait longer until more conventional vaccines , using other technologies , such as Russia ’ s adenovirus-vector vaccine , are available .
Generally speaking , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccines , which is why some are apprehensive about the long-term side effects , which can ’ t be reliably studied .
Countries like India are facing particular difficulties given that shipping regular consumer goods remains a difficult , even treacherous , process across much of the country ’ s hinterland .
Health-care experts in the country have already dismissed sub-zero storage as completely unworkable – “ just forget it , one said.
” Many working in the country ’ s public health and the pharmaceutical industry have already voiced concern that India @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deliver a vaccine across its vast rural hinterland and population of over 1.3 billion people at the breakneck speed now expected .
“ Most of these vaccines need minus 70 degrees , which we just can ’ t do in India , just forget it , ” said T. Sundararaman , a New Delhi-based global coordinator of the People ’ s Health Movement , an organization that brings together local activists , academics and civil society groups working on public health .
“ Our current cold chains are not able to cope with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and that ’ s only for children below the age of 3 , ” he said .
“ That ’ s a really trivial number of people compared to the numbers that will need a Covid-19 vaccine.
” When asked at a Tuesday briefing if India ’ s government would look to buy any of the Pfizer vaccine , Rajesh Bhushan , the secretary at the health ministry , said New Delhi is in talks with all vaccine manufacturers .
He added that India was in a position to “ augment and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but declined to release any purchase details immediately .
So , judging by the way things are going… …it looks like the world is headed for a tiered system : one vaccine for the wealthy , and one another for the poor .
( ER : Which may not be a bad thing for the poorer nations . )
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com

A logistical “roadmap” from Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical has been released showing the staggering logistical feats required to transport and store the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, which has just been christened by Bloomberg as “the vaccine of the rich”.
Offering some more insight into details that have been the subject of much speculation on Wall Street, Bloomberg reported on this “complex and costly” private network that companies are building to help distribute vaccines like Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine (a technology that’s also being used by another leading candidate, Moderna), that is, once it has finally been approved.
Countries that don’t already have these networks will need to build them from scratch if they wish to substantially reduce the supply bottleneck, which would be “a herculean task”.
That means that countries will need to build from scratch the deep-freeze production, storage and transportation networks needed for the vaccine to survive. This massive investment and coordination required all but guarantees that only rich nations will manage to dial up access, with the wealthy first in line to receive their doses.
“Its production is costly, its component is unstable, it also requires cold-chain transportation and has a short shelf life,” said Ding Sheng, director of the Beijing-based Global Health Drug Discovery Institute, which has received funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
The WHO and Bill Gates have invested plenty of time on a PR campaign warning that access to the vaccine must be made ‘universal’ – that is, extended to all of earth’s 7.7 billion people – or humanity won’t manage to eradicate COVID-19. Together, they’ve backed a project called ‘Covax’ which aims to raise $18 billion to pay for vaccines for poorer countries.
But even once they’ve been paid for, the task remains: how can we physically ship and store them in such vast quantities?
The massive expense of the infrastructure investment means many of these poorer countries are now faced with a difficult choice: invest in the supply network, even before the vaccines have been approved, and take a risk should unforeseen complications arise, or wait to see how everything pans out for the developed world, sacrificing valuable time. Many of these economies could simply wait longer until more conventional vaccines, using other technologies, such as Russia’s adenovirus-vector vaccine, are available. Generally speaking, mRNA vaccines are a new class of vaccines, which is why some are apprehensive about the long-term side effects, which can’t be reliably studied.
“If there is a protein-based vaccine that could achieve the same effect as an mRNA vaccine does and there’s the need to vaccinate billions of people every year, I’d go for the protein-based shots in the long run,” Ding said.
Countries like India are facing particular difficulties given that shipping regular consumer goods remains a difficult, even treacherous, process across much of the country’s hinterland. Health-care experts in the country have already dismissed sub-zero storage as completely unworkable – “just forget it, one said.”
Many working in the country’s public health and the pharmaceutical industry have already voiced concern that India lacks the necessary capacity and capability to deliver a vaccine across its vast rural hinterland and population of over 1.3 billion people at the breakneck speed now expected. “Most of these vaccines need minus 70 degrees, which we just can’t do in India, just forget it,” said T. Sundararaman, a New Delhi-based global coordinator of the People’s Health Movement, an organization that brings together local activists, academics and civil society groups working on public health. “Our current cold chains are not able to cope with some districts’ need for measles vaccines, and that’s only for children below the age of 3,” he said. “That’s a really trivial number of people compared to the numbers that will need a Covid-19 vaccine.” When asked at a Tuesday briefing if India’s government would look to buy any of the Pfizer vaccine, Rajesh Bhushan, the secretary at the health ministry, said New Delhi is in talks with all vaccine manufacturers. He added that India was in a position to “augment and strengthen” its existing cold-chain capacity, but declined to release any purchase details immediately.
So, judging by the way things are going…
…it looks like the world is headed for a tiered system: one vaccine for the wealthy, and one another for the poor. (ER: Which may not be a bad thing for the poorer nations.)
************
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-12--Top Pfizer Whistleblower Trashes Company’s Vaccine ‘Breakthrough’ Spin

Yesterday ( ER : Nov.9 ) , Pfizer announced to much media fanfare that it has a breakthrough in the search for a reliable COVID-19 vaccine , claiming studies showed it can prevent 90 % of people contracting the virus .
But respected former vice-president of Pfizer , Dr. Michael Yeadon , raises serious concerns .
World stocks and shares are surging upwards after hearing the press announcement on Monday that the drugmaker has claimed a major victory in the war against a virus that allegedly killed over a million people , but has certainly battered the world ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ BioNTech SE 22UAy.F said they had found no serious safety concerns yet and expected to seek U.S. emergency use authorization this month , raising the chance of a regulatory decision as soon as December .
If granted , the companies estimate they can roll out up to 50 million doses this year , enough to protect 25 million people , and then produce up to 1.3 billion doses in 2021 .
“ Today is a great day for science and humanity , ” said Pfizer Chief Executive Albert Bourla , noting the data @ @ @ @ @ @ @ new records , hospitals nearing over-capacity and economies struggling to reopen.
” Experts said they wanted to see the full trial data , but the preliminary results looked encouraging.
” But Pfizer has an enormous fly in the ointment of their corporate bragadaccio : former vice-president of Pfizer , Dr. Michael Yeadon , now coming to the fore as a prominent whistleblower of the global pandemic vaccine fraud .
As reported on www.weblyf.com and other alternative media outlets , Professor Yeadon is exposing a host of junk science claims : “ As a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ziarco , now owned by Novartis , Dr. Yeadon has more than three decades of experience and expertise in the research and development , as well as in the areas of biochemistry , toxicology , including the development of new drugs and treatment .
Dr. Yeadon believes that the data regarding COVID 19 that most governments rely are “ fake ” and mostly impossible to be validated objectively .
Sad to say , despite all these debacles about a fake pandemic , many governments in various parts of the world still continue to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ absurd their justifications are.
” Batting for Big Pharma is CDC and White House pandemic task force front man , Dr Anthony Fauci , who lauded Pfizer ’ s new claims , telling CNN : However , Dr Anthony Fauci – along with his boss at NIH – are among many key government medical advisers who are hardly impartial observers .
They are heavily invested in Big Pharma vaccine shares .
There are growing calls for a full investigation of this medical elite clique .
Curiously , even Fauci admitted the COVID test @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dissent is growing and further admits it is “ disturbing ” that so few people want the new vaccine .
As such governments like the UK are pushing through mandatory vaccine laws .
But the most compelling opposition is among independent medical professionals .
Over 30,000 medical doctors and related experts have signed the Great Barrington Declaration calling out proven irregularities and expressing grave concerns .
Not only have governments and their ‘ science advisers ’ grossly overreacted to the pandemic , it has become very clear from the evidence that the claimed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ global health than any normal flu bug .
The need to roll out a trillion-dollar mass compulsory vaccination program using ‘ rushed through ’ vaccines is not only reckless , it may end up killing more people than the virus itself .
Pointing to the fact evidence shows no mass winter vaccination program is warranted , Dr. Yeadon stated : So distressed by the way the UK government has pandered to the vaccine lobby on this key issue , Professor Yeadon wrote an open letter to Matt Hancock , the Secretary of State @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kingdom , who has ordered his department to publish the proposed changes to the Human Medicine Regulations “ to cover a potential roll-out of a vaccine ” .
I have a degree in Biochemistry & Toxicology & a research based PhD in pharmacology .
I have spent 32 years working in pharmaceutical R & D , mostly in new medicines for disorders of lung & skin .
I was a VP at Pfizer & CEO of a biotech I founded ( Ziarco – acquired by Novartis ) .
I ’ m knowledgeable about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have read the consultation document .
I ’ ve rarely been as shocked & upset .
All vaccines against the SARS-COV-2 virus are by definition novel .
No candidate vaccine has been in development for more than a few months .
If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not EXPLICITLY experimental , I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent .
This is because there are precisely zero human volunteers for whom there could possibly be more than a few months past-dose safety information @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I have negative views about vaccines ( I don ’ t ) .
Instead , it ’ s the very principle that politicians seem ready to waive that new medical interventions at this , incomplete state of development – should not be made available to subjects on anything other than an explicitly experimental basis .
That ’ s my concern .
And the reason for that concern is that it is not known what the safety profile will be , six months or a year or longer after dosing .
You have literally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anyone else .
It isn ’ t that I ’ m saying that unacceptable adverse effects will emerge after longer intervals after dosing .
No : it is that you have no idea what will happen , yet despite this , you ’ ll be creating the impression that you do .
Several of the vaccine candidates utilise novel technology which have not previously been used to create vaccines .
There is therefore no long term safety data which can be pointed to in support of the notion that it ’ s reasonable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ safety information on this occasion .
I am suspicious of the motives of those proposing expedited use in the wider human population .
We now understand who is at particularly elevated risk of morbidity & mortality from acquiring this virus .
Volunteers from these groups only should be provided detailed information about risk / benefit , including the sole point I make here .
Only if informed consent is given should any EXPERIMENTAL vaccine be used .
I don ’ t trust you .
You ’ ve not been straightforward & have behaved @ @ @ @ @ @ @ re still doing it now , misleading about infection risk from young children .
Why should I believe you in relation to experimental vaccines ?
As each week passes it becomes all too clear that the British government cares little about what independent medical experts say and is going all in on implementing their mass compulsory vaccination plan using the military , as stated in the controversial consultation document .
In a separate Tweet about the UK ’ s plans Professor Yeadon lamented : Here at Principia Scientific International we are actively building @ @ @ @ @ @ @ robust empirical and documented evidence exposing the scam .
Central to the science we present is the inescapable fact that no laboratory anywhere in the world has been proven to have isolated , refined and reproduced the virus to the accepted standard .
The COVID-19 Cart Is STILL In Front Of The Horse .
We Argue That COVID19 Is Really A CDC Computer-Generated ‘ Virus ’ And The Shocking Admission From The United States ’ Centers For Disease Control And Prevention ( CDC ) Which Admitted In An Official Document That : “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Are Currently Available… ” Freedom of Information law ( FOI ) requests to several international government science agencies have revealed English-speaking nations have no such ‘ gold standard ’ proof of any such SARS-Cov-2 virus ( the claimed cause of the pandemic ) .
Admitting this key flaw is the UK and Ireland .
Health Canada Has No Record Of ‘ COVID-19 Virus ’ Isolation .
While a New Zealand university has been exposed for falsely claiming it has isolated the virus .
The question we pose to the Big Pharma crony capitalists @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : how can you remotely claim to have a successful vaccine for a virus you haven ’ t even properly isolated and verified ?
About the author : John O ’ Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder ( with Dr Tim Ball ) of Principia Scientific International ( PSI ) .
John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert , Michael ‘ hockey stick ’ Mann in the ‘ science trial of the century ‘ .
O ’ Sullivan is credited as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Slayers ’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world ’ s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book .
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues @ @ @ @ @ @ @ distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Top Pfizer Whistleblower Trashes Company’s Vaccine ‘Breakthrough’ Spin
JOHN O’SULLIVAN
Yesterday (ER: Nov.9), Pfizer announced to much media fanfare that it has a breakthrough in the search for a reliable COVID-19 vaccine, claiming studies showed it can prevent 90% of people contracting the virus. But respected former vice-president of Pfizer, Dr. Michael Yeadon, raises serious concerns.
World stocks and shares are surging upwards after hearing the press announcement on Monday that the drugmaker has claimed a major victory in the war against a virus that allegedly killed over a million people, but has certainly battered the world’s economy.
Reuters.com are reporting:
“Pfizer and German partner BioNTech SE 22UAy.F said they had found no serious safety concerns yet and expected to seek U.S. emergency use authorization this month, raising the chance of a regulatory decision as soon as December. If granted, the companies estimate they can roll out up to 50 million doses this year, enough to protect 25 million people, and then produce up to 1.3 billion doses in 2021. “Today is a great day for science and humanity,” said Pfizer Chief Executive Albert Bourla, noting the data milestone comes with “infection rates setting new records, hospitals nearing over-capacity and economies struggling to reopen.” Experts said they wanted to see the full trial data, but the preliminary results looked encouraging.”
But Pfizer has an enormous fly in the ointment of their corporate bragadaccio: former vice-president of Pfizer, Dr. Michael Yeadon, now coming to the fore as a prominent whistleblower of the global pandemic vaccine fraud.
As reported on www.weblyf.com and other alternative media outlets, Professor Yeadon is exposing a host of junk science claims:
“As a founder and CEO of the biotech company Ziarco, now owned by Novartis, Dr. Yeadon has more than three decades of experience and expertise in the research and development, as well as in the areas of biochemistry, toxicology, including the development of new drugs and treatment. Dr. Yeadon believes that the data regarding COVID 19 that most governments rely are “fake” and mostly impossible to be validated objectively. Sad to say, despite all these debacles about a fake pandemic, many governments in various parts of the world still continue to defend this coronavirus rhetoric no matter how absurd their justifications are.”
Batting for Big Pharma is CDC and White House pandemic task force front man, Dr Anthony Fauci, who lauded Pfizer’s new claims, telling CNN:
“But the bottom line is, as a vaccine it’s more than 90% effective, which is extraordinary.”
However, Dr Anthony Fauci – along with his boss at NIH – are among many key government medical advisers who are hardly impartial observers. They are heavily invested in Big Pharma vaccine shares. There are growing calls for a full investigation of this medical elite clique. Curiously, even Fauci admitted the COVID test Has a Fatal Flaw.
Fauci knows dissent is growing and further admits it is “disturbing” that so few people want the new vaccine. As such governments like the UK are pushing through mandatory vaccine laws.
But the most compelling opposition is among independent medical professionals. Over 30,000 medical doctors and related experts have signed the Great Barrington Declaration calling out proven irregularities and expressing grave concerns.
Not only have governments and their ‘science advisers’ grossly overreacted to the pandemic, it has become very clear from the evidence that the claimed novel coronavirus has no more impact on global health than any normal flu bug.
The need to roll out a trillion-dollar mass compulsory vaccination program using ‘rushed through’ vaccines is not only reckless, it may end up killing more people than the virus itself.
Pointing to the fact evidence shows no mass winter vaccination program is warranted, Dr. Yeadon stated:
“Were it not for the test data that you get from the TV all the time, you would rightly conclude that the pandemic was over, as nothing much has happened. Of course people go to the hospital, moving into the autumn flu season…but there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen.”
So distressed by the way the UK government has pandered to the vaccine lobby on this key issue, Professor Yeadon wrote an open letter to Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care of United Kingdom, who has ordered his department to publish the proposed changes to the Human Medicine Regulations “to cover a potential roll-out of a vaccine”.
Dr Yeadon’s letter to the UK Health Minister reads:
“Dear Mr. Hancock, I have a degree in Biochemistry & Toxicology & a research based PhD in pharmacology. I have spent 32 years working in pharmaceutical R&D, mostly in new medicines for disorders of lung & skin. I was a VP at Pfizer & CEO of a biotech I founded (Ziarco – acquired by Novartis). I’m knowledgeable about new medicine R&D. I have read the consultation document. I’ve rarely been as shocked & upset. All vaccines against the SARS-COV-2 virus are by definition novel. No candidate vaccine has been in development for more than a few months. If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not EXPLICITLY experimental, I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent. This is because there are precisely zero human volunteers for whom there could possibly be more than a few months past-dose safety information. My concern does not arise because I have negative views about vaccines (I don’t). Instead, it’s the very principle that politicians seem ready to waive that new medical interventions at this, incomplete state of development – should not be made available to subjects on anything other than an explicitly experimental basis. That’s my concern. And the reason for that concern is that it is not known what the safety profile will be, six months or a year or longer after dosing. You have literally no data on this & neither does anyone else. It isn’t that I’m saying that unacceptable adverse effects will emerge after longer intervals after dosing. No: it is that you have no idea what will happen, yet despite this, you’ll be creating the impression that you do. Several of the vaccine candidates utilise novel technology which have not previously been used to create vaccines. There is therefore no long term safety data which can be pointed to in support of the notion that it’s reasonable to expedite development & to waive absent safety information on this occasion. I am suspicious of the motives of those proposing expedited use in the wider human population. We now understand who is at particularly elevated risk of morbidity & mortality from acquiring this virus. Volunteers from these groups only should be provided detailed information about risk / benefit, including the sole point I make here. Only if informed consent is given should any EXPERIMENTAL vaccine be used. I don’t trust you. You’ve not been straightforward & have behaved appallingly throughout this crisis. You’re still doing it now, misleading about infection risk from young children. Why should I believe you in relation to experimental vaccines? Dr. Michael Yeadon References:
As each week passes it becomes all too clear that the British government cares little about what independent medical experts say and is going all in on implementing their mass compulsory vaccination plan using the military, as stated in the controversial consultation document.
In a separate Tweet about the UK’s plans Professor Yeadon lamented:
“I Have Read The Consultation Document. I’ve Rarely Been As Shocked And Upset. I Believe Recipients Are Being Misled To A Criminal Extent.”
Here at Principia Scientific International we are actively building a highly-qualified team of international experts presenting robust empirical and documented evidence exposing the scam. Central to the science we present is the inescapable fact that no laboratory anywhere in the world has been proven to have isolated, refined and reproduced the virus to the accepted standard.
The COVID-19 Cart Is STILL In Front Of The Horse. We Argue That COVID19 Is Really A CDC Computer-Generated ‘Virus’ And The Shocking Admission From The United States’ Centers For Disease Control And Prevention (CDC) Which Admitted In An Official Document That:
“No Quantified Virus Isolates Of The 2019-NCoV Are Currently Available…”
Freedom of Information law (FOI) requests to several international government science agencies have revealed English-speaking nations have no such ‘gold standard’ proof of any such SARS-Cov-2 virus (the claimed cause of the pandemic). Admitting this key flaw is the UK and Ireland. Health Canada Has No Record Of ‘COVID-19 Virus’ Isolation.
While a New Zealand university has been exposed for falsely claiming it has isolated the virus.
The question we pose to the Big Pharma crony capitalists and their bought-off friends in government is:
how can you remotely claim to have a successful vaccine for a virus you haven’t even properly isolated and verified?
************
Source
About the author: John O’Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI). John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.