thelibertybeacon--2020-05-21--“Trust Is Being Undermined” – Harvard Med School Prof Questions Fauci’s “Shading” of Trial Results [

“Trust Is Being Undermined” – Harvard Med School Prof Questions Fauci’s “Shading” of Trial Results [VIDEO]

At a moment in time when narrative-following “ scientists ” are lauded like unquestionably omniscient supreme beings enabling dumb-as-a-rock-partisan-politicians to play omnipotent overlords without fear of blowback , the world needs more people like William Haseltine .
The last two weeks have seen markets and politicians jump exuberantly at the hope of every press release from a biotech firm that proclaims one of their pet rabbits didn ’ t die when they fed it their latest DNA-reshaping test material ( oh that is except if anyone dares say anything positive about hydroxychloroquine but that is a topic for another discussion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rests on a vaccine ( and definitely not herd immunity , don ’ t even mention it ) .
Barstool Sports ’ Dave Portnoy said it right – when did we shift from “ flatten the curve , flatten the curve , flatten the curve ” to “ we have to fund a cure or everyone ’ s going to die.
” And so , that is where we find ourselves… Every talking head proclaiming the same malarkey – we will re-open carefully , with PPE , and social distancing , and whetever @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we find a vaccine in 12-18 months ” at which point the world will be made whole again and Kumbaya… All of which brings us back to the man of the day in our humble opinion .
Former Harvard Medical School professor and founder of the university ’ s cancer and HIV/AIDS research departments , William Haseltine dared to speak out today about the high level of bullshit and damage that is being done to “ trust ” in “ scientists ” and even dared to break the one holy writ that shall @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dr.Fauci .
Reflecting on Moderna ’ s press release this week ( which was immediately followed by massive equity raises across numerous biotech firms and upgrades from the underwriters , surprise ) , Haseltine said : The CNBC anchor desperately tried to guilt him into the official narrative of clinging to any hope as long as it lifts stocks – no matter its utter bullshittiness – but Haseltine destroyed her naive party line : Moderna did not follow the process : But , but , but… the CNBC anchorette blubbered , “ are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that this was encouraging news ?
” The full interview below is a must-watch by all who care about their freedom being controlled by a narrative directed by fearmongering elites in the name of “ science ” when the “ science ” is a ) being ignored , b ) being bastardized to meet a political need , c ) being treated as if handed down on high from the man himself , or d ) being manipulated explicitly .
Why this former Harvard Med School prof says Moderna ’ s vaccine trial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CNBC .
Haseltine ’ s interview is perfect lead into his opinion piece in todays ’ Washington Post : Faith in medicine and science is based on trust .
But today , in the rush to share scientific progress in combating covid-19 , that trust is being undermined .
Private companies , governments and research institutes are holding news conferences to report potential breakthroughs that can not be verified .
The results are always favorable , but the full data on which the announcements are based are not immediately available for critical review @ @ @ @ @ @ @ release , ” and it ’ s damaging trust in the fundamental methods of science and medicine at a time when we need it most .
The most recent example is Moderna ’ s claim Monday of favorable results in its vaccine trial , which it announced without revealing any of the underlying data .
The announcement added billions of dollars to the value of the company , with its shares jumping almost 20 percent .
Many analysts believe it contributed to a 900-point gain in the Dow Jones industrial average .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine based on eight healthy participants .
The claim was that in all eight people , the vaccine raised the levels of neutralizing antibodies equivalent to those found in convalescent serum of those who recovered from covid-19 .
What to make of that claim ?
Hard to say , because we have no sense of what those levels were .
This is the equivalent of a chief executive of a public company announcing a favorable earnings report without supplying supporting financial data , which the Securities and Exchange Commission would never allow .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Moderna ’ s unsupported assertion means .
The scientific and medical literature reports that some people who have recovered have little to no detectable neutralizing antibodies .
There is even existing scientific literature that suggests it is possible neutralizing antibodies may not protect animals or humans from infection or reinfection by coronaviruses .
Such “ publication by press release ” seems to be a standard practice lately .
The National Institutes of Health announced last month that the drug remdesivir offered a clear benefit to covid-19 patients with moderate disease , shortening the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ days .
But did it really ?
Twenty days after the announcement , the supporting data has still not been published .
Without the data , no doctor treating a patient can be sure they are doing the right thing .
Another paper , published the same day , found that remdesivir had no measurable effect on patient survival or the amount of virus detectable in nasopharynx and lung secretions .
What then should a practicing physician do ?
Follow the unsupported advice of a news announcement or a medical report published in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not an idle question : The NIH announcement triggered a global stampede for limited supplies of the drug .
The case is more nuanced for the vaccine developed by the Jenner Institute at Oxford University , though the mileposts remain the same : It started with a public pronouncement of favorable results from an early study , this time in monkeys , well before any data was publicly released .
An NIH scientist working on a trial of the Oxford vaccine gave an interview to the New York Times , claiming the drug @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , released as a prepublication version more than two weeks after the story ran , didn ’ t quite live up to the early claim .
All of the vaccinated monkeys became infected when introduced to the virus .
Though there was some reduction in the amount of viral RNA detected in the lungs , there was no reduction in the nasal secretions in the vaccinated monkeys .
So the positive result reported by the Oxford group turned out not to be protection from infection at all , something most would agree is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Instead , it lowered only the amount of virus recoverable from the vaccinated monkey ’ s lung .
To the Jenner Institute ’ s credit , it does warn visitors to its website that there have been many false reports about the progress of its vaccine trial .
Still , having a scientist working on the trial paint preliminary results in such a positive manner without having yet released the full data is cause for concern .
We all understand the need to share scientific and medical data as rapidly as possible in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media announcement alone is not enough .
There are ways to share the data quickly and transparently : posting manuscripts before review or acceptance on publicly available websites or working with journals to allow an early view .
Publishing in this manner allows doctors and scientists to reach their own conclusion , based on the evidence available .
Asking experts to opine on unsubstantiated claims is not useful .
Medicine and science are not matters of majority opinion ; they are matters of fact supported by transparent data .
This is the backbone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to end this pandemic .
We can ’ t give up on our standards now .
So , by all means , trust in “ science ” but

At a moment in time when narrative-following “scientists” are lauded like unquestionably omniscient supreme beings enabling dumb-as-a-rock-partisan-politicians to play omnipotent overlords without fear of blowback, the world needs more people like William Haseltine.
The last two weeks have seen markets and politicians jump exuberantly at the hope of every press release from a biotech firm that proclaims one of their pet rabbits didn’t die when they fed it their latest DNA-reshaping test material (oh that is except if anyone dares say anything positive about hydroxychloroquine but that is a topic for another discussion) as the fate of global citizenry rests on a vaccine (and definitely not herd immunity, don’t even mention it).
Barstool Sports’ Dave Portnoy said it right – when did we shift from “flatten the curve, flatten the curve, flatten the curve” to “we have to fund a cure or everyone’s going to die.”
And so, that is where we find ourselves… Every talking head proclaiming the same malarkey – we will re-open carefully, with PPE, and social distancing, and whetever else is mandated from on-high “until we find a vaccine in 12-18 months” at which point the world will be made whole again and Kumbaya…
All of which brings us back to the man of the day in our humble opinion.
Former Harvard Medical School professor and founder of the university’s cancer and HIV/AIDS research departments, William Haseltine dared to speak out today about the high level of bullshit and damage that is being done to “trust” in “scientists” and even dared to break the one holy writ that shall go un-mentioned, throwing some shade at Dr.Fauci.
Reflecting on Moderna’s press release this week (which was immediately followed by massive equity raises across numerous biotech firms and upgrades from the underwriters, surprise), Haseltine said:
“If a CFO had tried to get away with such an opaque and data-less statement it would have been treated with derision and possibly an investigation.”
The CNBC anchor desperately tried to guilt him into the official narrative of clinging to any hope as long as it lifts stocks – no matter its utter bullshittiness – but Haseltine destroyed her naive party line:
“we all know it’s an emergency, and in an emergency, it’s even more important to be clear on what you know and what you do not know.”
Moderna did not follow the process:
“you don’t know what happened, we don’t know what happened, there is no data.”
But, but, but… the CNBC anchorette blubbered, “are you questioning Dr. Fauci who also said that this was encouraging news?”
“Whether [Fauci] shaded what should should have been done, I think is an important question. He’s obviously under enormous pressure for positive results but it was not the right thing to do if you can’t see the data.”
The full interview below is a must-watch by all who care about their freedom being controlled by a narrative directed by fearmongering elites in the name of “science” when the “science” is a) being ignored, b) being bastardized to meet a political need, c) being treated as if handed down on high from the man himself, or d) being manipulated explicitly.
Why this former Harvard Med School prof says Moderna’s vaccine trial ‘publication by press release’ from CNBC.
Haseltine’s interview is perfect lead into his opinion piece in todays’ Washington Post:
Faith in medicine and science is based on trust. But today, in the rush to share scientific progress in combating covid-19, that trust is being undermined.
Private companies, governments and research institutes are holding news conferences to report potential breakthroughs that cannot be verified. The results are always favorable, but the full data on which the announcements are based are not immediately available for critical review. This is “publication by press release,” and it’s damaging trust in the fundamental methods of science and medicine at a time when we need it most.
The most recent example is Moderna’s claim Monday of favorable results in its vaccine trial, which it announced without revealing any of the underlying data. The announcement added billions of dollars to the value of the company, with its shares jumping almost 20 percent. Many analysts believe it contributed to a 900-point gain in the Dow Jones industrial average.
The Moderna announcement described asafety trial of its vaccine based on eight healthy participants. The claim was that in all eight people, the vaccine raised the levels of neutralizing antibodies equivalent to those found in convalescent serum of those who recovered from covid-19. What to make of that claim? Hard to say, because we have no sense of what those levels were. This is the equivalent of a chief executive of a public company announcing a favorable earnings report without supplying supporting financial data, which the Securities and Exchange Commission would never allow.
There is a legitimate question regarding what Moderna’s unsupported assertion means. The scientific and medical literature reports that some people who have recovered have little to no detectable neutralizing antibodies. There is even existing scientific literature that suggests it is possible neutralizing antibodies may not protect animals or humans from infection or reinfection by coronaviruses.
Such “publication by press release” seems to be a standard practice lately.
The National Institutes of Health announced last month that the drug remdesivir offered a clear benefit to covid-19 patients with moderate disease, shortening the length of their hospital stay by several days. But did it really? Twenty days after the announcement, the supporting data has still not been published. Without the data, no doctor treating a patient can be sure they are doing the right thing.
Another paper, published the same day, found that remdesivir had no measurable effect on patient survival or the amount of virus detectable in nasopharynx and lung secretions. What then should a practicing physician do? Follow the unsupported advice of a news announcement or a medical report published in a leading scientific journal? This is not an idle question: The NIH announcement triggered a global stampede for limited supplies of the drug.
The case is more nuanced for the vaccine developed by the Jenner Institute at Oxford University, though the mileposts remain the same: It started with a public pronouncement of favorable results from an early study, this time in monkeys, well before any data was publicly released. An NIH scientist working on a trial of the Oxford vaccine gave an interview to the New York Times, claiming the drug was a success.
But the data, released as a prepublication version more than two weeks after the story ran, didn’t quite live up to the early claim. All of the vaccinated monkeys became infected when introduced to the virus. Though there was some reduction in the amount of viral RNA detected in the lungs, there was no reduction in the nasal secretions in the vaccinated monkeys. So the positive result reported by the Oxford group turned out not to be protection from infection at all, something most would agree is what a successful vaccine would do. Instead, it lowered only the amount of virus recoverable from the vaccinated monkey’s lung.
To the Jenner Institute’s credit, it does warn visitors to its website that there have been many false reports about the progress of its vaccine trial. Still, having a scientist working on the trial paint preliminary results in such a positive manner without having yet released the full data is cause for concern.
We all understand the need to share scientific and medical data as rapidly as possible in this time of crisis. But a media announcement alone is not enough. There are ways to share the data quickly and transparently: posting manuscripts before review or acceptance on publicly available websites or working with journals to allow an early view. Publishing in this manner allows doctors and scientists to reach their own conclusion, based on the evidence available.
The media also bears responsibility. Asking experts to opine on unsubstantiated claims is not useful. Medicine and science are not matters of majority opinion; they are matters of fact supported by transparent data. This is the backbone of scientific progress and our only hope to end this pandemic. We can’t give up on our standards now.
* * *
So, by all means, trust in “science” but choose your “scientist” well…
************


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-21--As Moderna’s COVID-19 Vaccine Takes the Lead, its Chief Medical Officer’s Recent Promotion of “Gene-

As Moderna’s COVID-19 Vaccine Takes the Lead, its Chief Medical Officer’s Recent Promotion of “Gene-Editing Vaccines” Comes to Light

Moderna ’ s Chief Medical Officer has described the company ’ s products as ‘ hacking the software of life ’ and permanently altering a person ’ s genetic code .
If Moderna is poised to bring the first COVID-19 vaccine to market , a deeper look at his comments and his employer are warranted .
More and more frequently , government officials , political pundits and self-appointed “ global health experts ” like billionaire Bill Gates have been instructing the public that mass gatherings and any semblance of “ normalcy ” will not return until a vaccine for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ distributed to the masses .
In recent weeks , it has quickly become apparent that the leading Covid-19 vaccine candidate is the messenger RNA ( mRNA ) vaccine being developed by Boston-based Moderna Inc. Today , Moderna announced that its vaccine candidate , named mRNA-1273 , “ appeared to produce an immune response in eight people who received it.
” Moderna ’ s response is odd given that the “ study ” in question is focused on safety and “ is actually not designed to measure effectiveness of the vaccine , ” according @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , none of the study ’ s findings on vaccine safety were reported aside from claims it was “ generally safe.
” It is also worth noting that this “ safety-focused ” study only began in March and thus , to date , represents only an examination of the vaccine ’ s effects in the very short term .
Major media outlets in multiple countries ran with the headlines trumpeting that Moderna ’ s Covid-19 “ shows promising early results ” and has presented “ encouraging early signs ” because of its purported @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In addition , these media reports failed to raise other simple yet necessary questions such as how a sample size of only eight people can translate into scientific findings of any real significance without further testing involving larger sample sizes .
They also failed to note that the study in question is not even finished as a U.S. government press release noted that the findings in question are merely “ interim results.
” In addition , the study is being led by the U.S. ’ National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dr. Anthony Fauci , who is a key figure in the U.S. government ’ s coronavirus response .
Though it is unclear if these “ encouraging early signs ” will be replicated in future tests of larger samples that are actually designed to test the vaccine ’ s effectiveness , the news is surely welcome to Moderna , given that their past mRNA vaccines failed to produce hardly any immune response at all , explaining why the company has never brought an mRNA vaccine to market in its entire history as a company @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fall , Moderna has sought to resolve this issue by adding “ nanoparticles ” to its mRNA vaccine , a modification financed by the Pentagon ’ s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency ( DARPA ) .
Moderna is a “ strategic ally ” of DARPA and has received millions from DARPA and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation several years prior to the current coronavirus crisis .
DARPA ’ s plans for nanoparticles and nanotechnology and their potentially Orwellian applications were the subject of a recent The Last American Vagabond report .
Thanks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this new study , Moderna is set to take the lead in the race to gain government approval for a Covid-19 vaccine .
Moderna had already pulled ahead of other Covid-19 vaccine candidates in recent weeks , being the first vaccine in the U.S. to go the human trials ( after it was allowed to skip animal trials ) and also enjoying strong support from the U.S. government .
For instance , Moderna ’ s Covid-19 vaccine recently received fast-track approval from the Food and Drug administration ( FDA ) after receiving the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Phase 2 testing prior to the results of Phase 1 being published .
Moderna ’ s president , Dr. Stephen Hoge , recently said the company now expects to begin the final third phase of testing sometime this summer .
In addition to support from the FDA , Moderna has also received considerable U.S. government funding ( $ 438 million ) from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority ( BARDA ) , a division of HHS overseen by HHS ’ Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response ( ASPR ) Robert Kadlec .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ directly collaborating with the U.S. government to bring its vaccine candidate to market .
Moderna ’ s considerable lead has also been the result of backing that it received in January from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations ( CEPI ) , which was founded in 2017 by the governments of Norway and India along with the World Economic Forum ( WEF ) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation .
Moderna ’ s Covid-19 vaccine has also received additional millions from long-time Moderna backer Bill Gates .
Gates recently authored an article @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine for Covid-19 as the “ most exciting ” and discussed it at length .
Gates ’ affinity for Moderna may owe to the fact that Moderna ’ s co-founder , MIT ’ s Robert Langer , is a Gates associate whose lab developed the Gates-funded “ quantum dot ‘ tattoo ’ ” vaccine identification marker that is “ visible using a special smartphone camera app and filter ” and was described by Science Alert as “ a low-risk tracking system.
” Another Langer-Gates partnership is a “ birth control microchip ” inserted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can be turned on and off wirelessly .
With Moderna taking a firm lead relative to the other Covid-19 vaccine hopefuls , it is worth taking a closer look at the man who has overseen its development , Moderna ’ s current Chief Medical Officer , Dr. Tal Zaks .
Zaks , an Israeli citizen who began his career at GlaxoSmithKline , oversees “ preclinical development , clinical development and regulatory affairs ” for Moderna and all of its subsidiaries .
In a 2017 TED Talk , two years after joining Moderna , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ views mRNA vaccines and their modality , including those he produces at Moderna .
In a speech entitled “ The disease-eradicating potential of gene editing , ” Zaks ’ description of Moderna ’ s mRNA products as making permanent edits to human genes clashes with often touted claims that the genetic material in mRNA vaccines “ degrade ” over time and do not permanently alter human genetics like DNA vaccines .
( ER : Notice that in both positions , mRNA vaccines are acknowledged to alter human genes .
The question is whether @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
If temporary , do the genetic changes just spring magically back to what they were ? )
Beginning his talk , Zaks states that Moderna and similar companies “ are actually hacking the software of life and that it ’ s changing the way we think of and treat disease.
” He describes mRNA as “ critical information that determines what a cell will actually do ” and then states that , if one could “ introduce a line of code or change a line of code ” in a person ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ implications for everything.
” He then falsely claims that Moderna ’ s products at the time were proven to “ work in people ” as the company , prior to Covid-19 , was never able to convince the federal government to license its mRNA vaccines for human use due to their lack of effectiveness .
Zaks further described his view of well-known diseases like cancer as being caused by “ screwed-up DNA ” that can be “ fixed ” with Moderna mRNA vaccines , which he also refers to in the talk as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ says Moderna ’ s vaccines work by altering the “ operating systems ” of human cells , i.e .
their genetic code .
The summary of Zaks ’ talk encapsulates his view as the following simple question : “ If our cells are the hardware and our genetic material the operating system , what if we could change a few lines of code ?
” — seemingly suggesting that the permanent introduction of changes into the human genome is as simple as troubleshooting or programming a computer or phone application .
It also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ personalized medicine ” to be “ gene-editing vaccines tailored to each patient ’ s immune system.
” The Ted Talk recommended after viewing Zaks ’ speech on the Ted Talk website notably broaches a key point that Zaks overlooks , namely that gene-editing can “ change an entire species – forever.
” Zaks ’ statements are noteworthy and concerning for several reasons , including the fact that DARPA — Moderna ’ s “ strategic ally ” — is also openly funding research aimed at “ reprogramming genes ” and “ manipulat [ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ] gene expression to combat viruses and help human bodies withstand infection ” caused by Covid-19 .
The DARPA-backed project would use a method that is known to cause that has actually been shown to aggravate the conditions it was meant to cure .
With such permanent gene-altering technology on the fast-track to become the first Covid-19 vaccine widely available for use , it is deeply concerning that this experimental vaccine with potentially far-reaching consequences is being rammed through thanks to fervent support from both the U.S. government and controversial philanthropists that apparently @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mRNA vaccine ’ s long-term effects .
Given that the stage has already been set for mandatory vaccinations that will be “ distributed ” throughout the U.S. , now is the time to vigorously raise awareness about the Moderna vaccine ’ s gravely under-reported ability to “ hack the software of life ” in ways that could harm public health .
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com

Moderna’s Chief Medical Officer has described the company’s products as ‘hacking the software of life’ and permanently altering a person’s genetic code. If Moderna is poised to bring the first COVID-19 vaccine to market, a deeper look at his comments and his employer are warranted.
More and more frequently, government officials, political pundits and self-appointed “global health experts” like billionaire Bill Gates have been instructing the public that mass gatherings and any semblance of “normalcy” will not return until a vaccine for the novel coronavirus Covid-19 is created and subsequently distributed to the masses. In recent weeks, it has quickly become apparent that the leading Covid-19 vaccine candidate is the messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine being developed by Boston-based Moderna Inc.
Today, Moderna announced that its vaccine candidate, named mRNA-1273, “appeared to produce an immune response in eight people who received it.” Moderna’s response is odd given that the “study” in question is focused on safety and “is actually not designed to measure effectiveness of the vaccine,” according to a report in TIME. Notably, none of the study’s findings on vaccine safety were reported aside from claims it was “generally safe.” It is also worth noting that this “safety-focused” study only began in March and thus, to date, represents only an examination of the vaccine’s effects in the very short term.
Major media outlets in multiple countries ran with the headlines trumpeting that Moderna’s Covid-19 “shows promising early results” and has presented “encouraging early signs” because of its purported ability to produce Covid-19 antibodies in humans. In addition, these media reports failed to raise other simple yet necessary questions such as how a sample size of only eight people can translate into scientific findings of any real significance without further testing involving larger sample sizes. They also failed to note that the study in question is not even finished as a U.S. government press release noted that the findings in question are merely “interim results.” In addition, the study is being led by the U.S.’ National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), itself headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, who is a key figure in the U.S. government’s coronavirus response.
Though it is unclear if these “encouraging early signs” will be replicated in future tests of larger samples that are actually designed to test the vaccine’s effectiveness, the news is surely welcome to Moderna, given that their past mRNA vaccines failed to produce hardly any immune response at all, explaining why the company has never brought an mRNA vaccine to market in its entire history as a company.
However, since at least last fall, Moderna has sought to resolve this issue by adding “nanoparticles” to its mRNA vaccine, a modification financed by the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Moderna is a “strategic ally” of DARPA and has received millions from DARPA and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation several years prior to the current coronavirus crisis. DARPA’s plans for nanoparticles and nanotechnology and their potentially Orwellian applications were the subject of a recent The Last American Vagabond report.
Thanks to the “interim results” of this new study, Moderna is set to take the lead in the race to gain government approval for a Covid-19 vaccine. Moderna had already pulled ahead of other Covid-19 vaccine candidates in recent weeks, being the first vaccine in the U.S. to go the human trials (after it was allowed to skip animal trials) and also enjoying strong support from the U.S. government. For instance, Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine recently received fast-track approval from the Food and Drug administration (FDA) after receiving the “green light” to proceed to Phase 2 testing prior to the results of Phase 1 being published. Moderna’s president, Dr. Stephen Hoge, recently said the company now expects to begin the final third phase of testing sometime this summer.
In addition to support from the FDA, Moderna has also received considerable U.S. government funding ($438 million) from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), a division of HHS overseen by HHS’ Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) Robert Kadlec. Moderna has also stated that it is directly collaborating with the U.S. government to bring its vaccine candidate to market.
Moderna’s considerable lead has also been the result of backing that it received in January from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), which was founded in 2017 by the governments of Norway and India along with the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine has also received additional millions from long-time Moderna backer Bill Gates. Gates recently authored an article where he described Moderna’s mRNA vaccine for Covid-19 as the “most exciting” and discussed it at length.
Gates’ affinity for Moderna may owe to the fact that Moderna’s co-founder, MIT’s Robert Langer, is a Gates associate whose lab developed the Gates-funded “quantum dot ‘tattoo’” vaccine identification marker that is “visible using a special smartphone camera app and filter” and was described by Science Alert as “a low-risk tracking system.” Another Langer-Gates partnership is a “birth control microchip” inserted to the body that releases contraceptives and can be turned on and off wirelessly.
MEET DR. ZAKS
With Moderna taking a firm lead relative to the other Covid-19 vaccine hopefuls, it is worth taking a closer look at the man who has overseen its development, Moderna’s current Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Tal Zaks. Zaks, an Israeli citizen who began his career at GlaxoSmithKline, oversees “preclinical development, clinical development and regulatory affairs” for Moderna and all of its subsidiaries.
In a 2017 TED Talk, two years after joining Moderna, Zaks spoke at length about how he views mRNA vaccines and their modality, including those he produces at Moderna. In a speech entitled “The disease-eradicating potential of gene editing,” Zaks’ description of Moderna’s mRNA products as making permanent edits to human genes clashes with often touted claims that the genetic material in mRNA vaccines “degrade” over time and do not permanently alter human genetics like DNA vaccines. (ER: Notice that in both positions, mRNA vaccines are acknowledged to alter human genes. The question is whether they’re permanent or temporary changes. If temporary, do the genetic changes just spring magically back to what they were?)
Beginning his talk, Zaks states that Moderna and similar companies “are actually hacking the software of life and that it’s changing the way we think of and treat disease.” He describes mRNA as “critical information that determines what a cell will actually do” and then states that, if one could “introduce a line of code or change a line of code” in a person’s genome, that has “profound implications for everything.” He then falsely claims that Moderna’s products at the time were proven to “work in people” as the company, prior to Covid-19, was never able to convince the federal government to license its mRNA vaccines for human use due to their lack of effectiveness.
Zaks further described his view of well-known diseases like cancer as being caused by “screwed-up DNA” that can be “fixed” with Moderna mRNA vaccines, which he also refers to in the talk as “information therapy” given that he says Moderna’s vaccines work by altering the “operating systems” of human cells, i.e. their genetic code.
The summary of Zaks’ talk encapsulates his view as the following simple question: “If our cells are the hardware and our genetic material the operating system, what if we could change a few lines of code?” — seemingly suggesting that the permanent introduction of changes into the human genome is as simple as troubleshooting or programming a computer or phone application. It also says that Zaks considers the future of “personalized medicine” to be “gene-editing vaccines tailored to each patient’s immune system.” The Ted Talk recommended after viewing Zaks’ speech on the Ted Talk website notably broaches a key point that Zaks overlooks, namely that gene-editing can “change an entire species – forever.”
Zaks’ statements are noteworthy and concerning for several reasons, including the fact that DARPA — Moderna’s “strategic ally” — is also openly funding research aimed at “reprogramming genes” and “manipulat[ing] genes or control[ling] gene expression to combat viruses and help human bodies withstand infection” caused by Covid-19.
The DARPA-backed project would use a method that is known to cause severe genetic damage that has actually been shown to aggravate the conditions it was meant to cure.
With such permanent gene-altering technology on the fast-track to become the first Covid-19 vaccine widely available for use, it is deeply concerning that this experimental vaccine with potentially far-reaching consequences is being rammed through thanks to fervent support from both the U.S. government and controversial philanthropists that apparently have little interest in studies examining the mRNA vaccine’s long-term effects.
Given that the stage has already been set for mandatory vaccinations that will be “distributed” throughout the U.S. by the military , now is the time to vigorously raise awareness about the Moderna vaccine’s gravely under-reported ability to “hack the software of life” in ways that could harm public health.
************
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-21--The Fauci Timeline — Sorting Fact From Fiction

Anthony Fauci ’ s name has become dinner-table familiar as people discuss the doctor ’ s warnings , his comments , and President Donald Trump ’ s responses to the COVID-19 pandemic .
As usual , a firm line has been drawn between the left and right sides of the aisle : Some blame the president for all the world ’ s problems and declare Fauci the hero in this crisis ; on the flip side , the doctor is the villain and the president has been misled and misinformed .
In truth , the whole Coronavirus fiasco has been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contradictory information since the beginning .
The blame game won ’ t fix anything , but perhaps stepping back to examine a timeline of facts and figures may bring clarity to the epic snarl of today ’ s social-distancing America .
Believe it or not , Fauci was once the captain of his high school ’ s basketball team in Manhattan ’ s Upper East Side .
In 1962 , he graduated from the College of the Holy Cross with a Bachelor of Arts in Classics .
In 1966 , he finished first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ College with a Doctor of Medicine .
After completing his residency in internal medicine , he joined the National Institutes of Health ( NIH ) in 1968 , becoming a clinical associate in the Laboratory of Clinical Investigation at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ( NIAID ) .
In 1974 , he became the head of the Clinical Physiology Section and , by 1980 , the chief of the Laboratory of Immunoregulation .
Fauci is no stranger to controversy surrounding his findings and methods .
In the 1980s , he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the AIDS epidemic .
Protesters from the LGBTQ community believed he was ignoring them .
A leading activist , playwright Larry Kramer , called him an “ incompetent idiot ” and a “ pill-pushing tool , ” although he has since changed his opinion .
In 1984 , Fauci became the director of NIAID and currently advises the president on the COVID-19 pandemic .
At 79 , the doctor has advised six presidents on everything from HIV to biodefense drugs .
Now , however , his credibility is coming into question as his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ American people who want nothing more than to get back to the business of life .
Without going into conspiracy theories , this is a factual timeline of COVID-19 incidents , Fauci ’ s relevant comments , and the actions and statements of Trump and other members of his administration .
As Liberty Nation ’ s Leesa K. Donner opined : First , Fauci seemed to predict this pandemic , or at least something similar , just after Trump took office : Conspiracy theory ?
History repeating itself ?
The knowledge gained by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some insight .
It all begins with what is not so affectionately called the China Cover-up .
Dec. 16 , 2019 : The first Coronavirus patient was seen at Wuhan Central Hospital , according to Dr. Ai Fen .
Dec. 31 : More than two dozen cases of Coronavirus were confirmed by Wuhan health authorities .
Local wet markets were closed , and China informed the World Health Organization ( WHO ) about the “ pneumonia ” but said it had “ found no obvious person-to-person transmission , and no medical personnel have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ however , several health care workers had reportedly been infected .
Also , Taiwan sent WHO an alert , claiming it was possible for the disease to transfer from human to human .
Jan. 1 , 2020 : The New York Times used cellphone data to discover that 175,000 people left Wuhan ( seven million more over the next few weeks ) .
Jan. 20 : China ’ s President Xi Jinping issued the first public statement about the virus , saying it “ must be taken seriously.
” Jan. 20 : Fauci @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worked on by the National Institutes of Health .
Jan 21 : In an interview , Greg Kelly of Newsmax asked Fauci how serious the virus was .
The doctor urged everyone to take the precautions that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) put out , “ but this is not a major threat for the people in the United States , and this is not something that the citizens of the United States right now should be worried about.
” Jan. 23 : WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ health emergency on an international level ; he was the deciding vote .
Wuhan lockdown went into effect , but by this time an estimated five million people had already traveled through and left the city for other parts of the country and world .
Jan. 28 : A Health and Human Services ( HHS ) press briefing included Fauci , Director of the CDC Robert Redfield , Director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases Dr. Nancy Messonnier , and Secretary of HHS Alex Azar .
Azar warned that “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ potentially very serious public health threat.
” Jan. 30 : The Trump administration had a conference call with state governors , Fauci , Azar , and Redfield , among others , and produced an action plan for the outbreak .
Jan. 31 : Trump imposed travel restrictions to and from China .
Feb. 8 : Fauci said the risk of contracting the virus is “ minuscule.
” Feb. 17 : Fauci told USA Today that wearing a mask is for the infected to protect others .
“ Now , in the United States @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to wear a mask.
” Feb. 24 : The Trump administration requested $ 2.5 billion from Congress to fight the Coronavirus .
On the same day , House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ( D-CA ) toured San Francisco ’ s Chinatown , telling residents to support the neighborhood .
“ That ’ s what we ’ re trying to do today is to say everything is fine here , ” she said .
“ Come because precautions have been taken .
The city is on top of the situation.
” Feb. 29 : The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , WA .
Feb. 29 : WHO said that it “ continues to advise against the application of travel restrictions to countries experiencing COVID-19 outbreaks.
” Feb. 29 : Fauci talks to the Today Show about “ community spread ” but “ right now , at this moment , there is no need to change anything you ’ re doing on a day-to-day basis.
” March 9 : Fauci tells reporters that young , healthy people can go on a cruise if they ’ d like .
“ If you are a healthy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if you want to go on a cruise ship , go on a cruise ship.
” March 26 : In an article for The New England Journal of Medicine , Fauci said , “ … the overall clinical consequences of COVID-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of severe seasonal influenza ( which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1 % ) or a pandemic influenza ( similar to those in 1957 and 1968 ) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS , which have had case fatality rates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ % , respectively.
” April 28 : Fauci said he is hopeful that a vaccine will be developed by the winter .
April 30 : Fauci said he is “ almost certain ” the virus will return in the winter , yet he is optimistic for a vaccine .
May 12 : Fauci now says the likelihood of developing a treatment or vaccine by the fall is “ a bridge too far.
” To be fair , the doctor did warn on several occasions that things could change if we reached “ community @ @ @ @ @ @ @ progress of Coronavirus in the United States and the responses of experts , is it any wonder that the American people are bewildered ?
Be sure to check LN ’ s China-WHO timeline for more facts .
( TLB ) published this article with permission of Liberty Nation and our appreciation for the availability .

The Fauci Timeline — Sorting Fact From Fiction
A bewildered American public is still trying to come to grips with the seriousness of Coronavirus.
By Kelli Ballard
Anthony Fauci’s name has become dinner-table familiar as people discuss the doctor’s warnings, his comments, and President Donald Trump’s responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. As usual, a firm line has been drawn between the left and right sides of the aisle: Some blame the president for all the world’s problems and declare Fauci the hero in this crisis; on the flip side, the doctor is the villain and the president has been misled and misinformed.
In truth, the whole Coronavirus fiasco has been a pile of convoluted, wishy-washy, contradictory information since the beginning. The blame game won’t fix anything, but perhaps stepping back to examine a timeline of facts and figures may bring clarity to the epic snarl of today’s social-distancing America.
Who Is Dr. Fauci?
Believe it or not, Fauci was once the captain of his high school’s basketball team in Manhattan’s Upper East Side. In 1962, he graduated from the College of the Holy Cross with a Bachelor of Arts in Classics. In 1966, he finished first in his class at Cornell University Medical College with a Doctor of Medicine. After completing his residency in internal medicine, he joined the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in 1968, becoming a clinical associate in the Laboratory of Clinical Investigation at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). In 1974, he became the head of the Clinical Physiology Section and, by 1980, the chief of the Laboratory of Immunoregulation.
Fauci is no stranger to controversy surrounding his findings and methods. In the 1980s, he was one of the leading researchers during the AIDS epidemic. Protesters from the LGBTQ community believed he was ignoring them. A leading activist, playwright Larry Kramer, called him an “incompetent idiot” and a “pill-pushing tool,” although he has since changed his opinion. In 1984, Fauci became the director of NIAID and currently advises the president on the COVID-19 pandemic.
At 79, the doctor has advised six presidents on everything from HIV to biodefense drugs. Now, however, his credibility is coming into question as his contradictory statements and advice have confused the American people who want nothing more than to get back to the business of life.
The Fauci Timeline
Without going into conspiracy theories, this is a factual timeline of COVID-19 incidents, Fauci’s relevant comments, and the actions and statements of Trump and other members of his administration. As Liberty Nation’s Leesa K. Donner opined:
“As we take stock of where we are and how we got here, one name repeatedly pops up as a culpable character in this unholy mess: Dr. Anthony Fauci. There are more than a few people with an incipient suspicion that Fauci may have taken the president – and this country – for a ride. Thus, it’s worth asking if we the people have succumbed to the Great Fauci Fake-Out by shutting down America for something akin to the seasonal flu?”
First, Fauci seemed to predict this pandemic, or at least something similar, just after Trump took office:
Jan. 12, 2017: “And if there’s one message that I want to leave with you today based on my experience, and you’ll see that in a moment, is that there is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases, both chronic infectious diseases, in the sense of already ongoing disease, and we have certainly a large burden of that, but also there will be a surprise outbreak.” [emphasis added]
Conspiracy theory? History repeating itself? The knowledge gained by the doctor? The timeline may give some insight.
It all begins with what is not so affectionately called the China Cover-up.
Dec. 16, 2019: The first Coronavirus patient was seen at Wuhan Central Hospital, according to Dr. Ai Fen.
Dec. 31: More than two dozen cases of Coronavirus were confirmed by Wuhan health authorities. Local wet markets were closed, and China informed the World Health Organization (WHO) about the “pneumonia” but said it had “found no obvious person-to-person transmission, and no medical personnel have been infected.” By this time, however, several health care workers had reportedly been infected. Also, Taiwan sent WHO an alert, claiming it was possible for the disease to transfer from human to human.
Jan. 1, 2020: The New York Times used cellphone data to discover that 175,000 people left Wuhan (seven million more over the next few weeks).
Jan. 6: Dr. Fauci begins interviews to discuss the Coronavirus outbreak.
Jan. 20: China’s President Xi Jinping issued the first public statement about the virus, saying it “must be taken seriously.”
Jan. 20: Fauci announced a Coronavirus vaccine was already being worked on by the National Institutes of Health.
Jan 21: In an interview, Greg Kelly of Newsmax asked Fauci how serious the virus was. The doctor urged everyone to take the precautions that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) put out, “but this is not a major threat for the people in the United States, and this is not something that the citizens of the United States right now should be worried about.”
Jan. 23: WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus voted against declaring the outbreak a public health emergency on an international level; he was the deciding vote. Wuhan lockdown went into effect, but by this time an estimated five million people had already traveled through and left the city for other parts of the country and world.
Jan. 28: A Health and Human Services (HHS) press briefing included Fauci, Director of the CDC Robert Redfield, Director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases Dr. Nancy Messonnier, and Secretary of HHS Alex Azar. Azar warned that “Americans should know that this is a potentially very serious public health threat.”
Jan. 30: The Trump administration had a conference call with state governors, Fauci, Azar, and Redfield, among others, and produced an action plan for the outbreak.
Jan. 31: Trump imposed travel restrictions to and from China.
Feb. 8: Fauci said the risk of contracting the virus is “minuscule.”
Feb. 17: Fauci told USA Today that wearing a mask is for the infected to protect others. “Now, in the United States, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever to wear a mask.”
Feb. 20: WHO reported 77,000 COVID-19 cases worldwide.
Feb. 24: The Trump administration requested $2.5 billion from Congress to fight the Coronavirus. On the same day, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) toured San Francisco’s Chinatown, telling residents to support the neighborhood. “That’s what we’re trying to do today is to say everything is fine here,” she said. “Come because precautions have been taken. The city is on top of the situation.”
Feb. 29: The first Coronavirus death was reported in Seattle, WA.
Feb. 29: WHO said that it “continues to advise against the application of travel restrictions to countries experiencing COVID-19 outbreaks.”
Feb. 29: Fauci talks to the Today Show about “community spread” but “right now, at this moment, there is no need to change anything you’re doing on a day-to-day basis.”
March 9: Fauci tells reporters that young, healthy people can go on a cruise if they’d like. “If you are a healthy young person, there is no reason if you want to go on a cruise ship, go on a cruise ship.”
March 26: In an article for The New England Journal of Medicine, Fauci said, “… the overall clinical consequences of COVID-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.”
April 28: Fauci said he is hopeful that a vaccine will be developed by the winter.
April 30: Fauci said he is “almost certain” the virus will return in the winter, yet he is optimistic for a vaccine.
May 12: Fauci now says the likelihood of developing a treatment or vaccine by the fall is “a bridge too far.”
To be fair, the doctor did warn on several occasions that things could change if we reached “community spreading.” But, looking over the progress of Coronavirus in the United States and the responses of experts, is it any wonder that the American people are bewildered?
Be sure to check LN’s China-WHO timeline for more facts.
(Original article)
*********
(TLB) published this article with permission of Liberty Nation and our appreciation for the availability.
National Correspondent at Liberty Nation.com.
Kelli Ballard is an author, editor, and publisher. Her writing interests span many genres including a former crime/government reporter, fiction novelist, and playwright. Originally a Central California girl, Kelli now resides in the Seattle area.
.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-21--The “Scientists have discovered” caper adds more smoke to the smoke and mirrors

New possible symptoms maybe might have been discovered .
.
.
probably .
.
.
unless of course they haven ’ t .
This article from the BBC ( which is heavily funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ) on 18th May , describes how “ it has been discovered that ” more symptoms should have been added to the so-called telltale signs of COVID19 infection but the government somehow forgot to mention them or something or other .
Bit of an oversight that – considering that the entire country has been shut down on account of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which was published the day before the PM spoke on the blower to Bill and Melinda Gates , presumably to get his orders , tells us that , Note the use of “ believe they might have had the virus ” , possible , could be .
That ’ s science is it ?
Note too how the list of possible symptoms is steadily broadening .
Chances are the list eventually will include every nuance of human slightly-unwell-ness : breaking wind , athletes foot , greasy hair .
BO and so forth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of scientific precision , is also , by the way , like the Imperial College ( which was responsible for the wildly inaccurate mathematical predictions of now-disgraced official Doomsayer , Professor Ferguson ) heavily funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation .
The symptoms , such as loss of smell and taste , of course , are symptoms that can arise from many causes , including the common cold or a dose of the flu , the use of drugs and medications and so on and so forth .
However , chucking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as science into the brew by authorities that keep moving the goal posts does help keep the COVID19 threat alive and thus provide further excuses to string the ruinous Lockdown out as long as possible .
The sudden announcement of these new symptoms is timely in so far it comes just when the effort to keep the country under house arrest is flagging as more and more people are beginning to small a rat .
One can visualise a scenario where thousands of people , noticing an impairment of their sense of taste @ @ @ @ @ @ @ possibly have COVID19 because they are exhibiting what might possibly be symptoms according to a survey of other people who might possibly maybe have had the disease they have seen so well advertised..
They then self-isolate because they have been told that is what they should do by the government .
Or their report of such symptoms is automatically counted as symptoms of C19 infection and we get a “ new spike ” in “ COVID 19 cases ” .
The “ new spike ” is blamed on the Lockdown not being lockdowny @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to keep the country suppressed .
This is flanked by the ongoing effort to misrepresent the COVID19 deaths stat , with the UK having more deaths than any other country for no apparent reason ( and no effort to explain it either – or indeed why the most locked-down countries have the worst stats ) .
In the words of one old lady who gave me her honest opinion this morning , Jon Davy is an international man of mystery .
He is not currently wanted by the police The above feature is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

New possible symptoms maybe might have been discovered . . . probably . . . unless of course they haven’t.
by Jon Davy
This article from the BBC (which is heavily funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) on 18th May, describes how “it has been discovered that” more symptoms should have been added to the so-called telltale signs of COVID19 infection but the government somehow forgot to mention them or something or other.
Bit of an oversight that – considering that the entire country has been shut down on account of the epidemic being so serious.
The article, which was published the day before the PM spoke on the blower to Bill and Melinda Gates, presumably to get his orders, tells us that,
Using an app, researchers at King’s College London have gathered symptom information from over 1.5m people in the UK who believe they might have had coronavirus. They say there are even more symptoms – such as tiredness and stomach pain or diarrhea – that could be included as possible coronavirus symptoms.
Note the use of “believe they might have had the virus”, possible, could be. That’s science is it?
Note too how the list of possible symptoms is steadily broadening. Chances are the list eventually will include every nuance of human slightly-unwell-ness: breaking wind, athletes foot, greasy hair. BO and so forth
Kings College London, obviously a bastion of scientific precision, is also, by the way, like the Imperial College (which was responsible for the wildly inaccurate mathematical predictions of now-disgraced official Doomsayer, Professor Ferguson) heavily funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
The symptoms, such as loss of smell and taste, of course, are symptoms that can arise from many causes, including the common cold or a dose of the flu, the use of drugs and medications and so on and so forth.
However, chucking this new conjectural “data” masquerading as science into the brew by authorities that keep moving the goal posts does help keep the COVID19 threat alive and thus provide further excuses to string the ruinous Lockdown out as long as possible. The sudden announcement of these new symptoms is timely in so far it comes just when the effort to keep the country under house arrest is flagging as more and more people are beginning to small a rat.
One can visualise a scenario where thousands of people, noticing an impairment of their sense of taste or smell, think they probably might possibly have COVID19 because they are exhibiting what might possibly be symptoms according to a survey of other people who might possibly maybe have had the disease they have seen so well advertised.. They then self-isolate because they have been told that is what they should do by the government. Or their report of such symptoms is automatically counted as symptoms of C19 infection and we get a “new spike” in “COVID 19 cases”.
The “new spike” is blamed on the Lockdown not being lockdowny enough, which of course fuels excuses to keep the country suppressed.
This is flanked by the ongoing effort to misrepresent the COVID19 deaths stat, with the UK having more deaths than any other country for no apparent reason (and no effort to explain it either – or indeed why the most locked-down countries have the worst stats).
In the words of one old lady who gave me her honest opinion this morning,
“It’s all a load of bollocks isn’t it?”
Jon Davy is an international man of mystery. He is not currently wanted by the police
The above feature is from UK Reloaded
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-05-21--LEARN 2 UNLEARN – Return to Health (E28) – “The Intensity of Intuition”

It really seems like my last show has just ended and I am now immediately doing another one… Why ?
Well , it is a combination of feeling blessed , feeling Grateful for what I have , not even knowing how long I have to live , … going blind , effectively , because , unless you are some Martial Arts expert or used to unusually deep Meditation , those HEIGHTS are quasi-unknown to the average ‘ Joe ’ .
Welcome to this week ’ s Episode !
And please allow me to add a bit to that last sentence… @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just spoke of , becoming a deeper person , being more connected to your own Spirit , the Spirit of Creator/God , there are as many words to describe this state as there are different Cultures in this world… Big Pharma , I am reasoning , after receiving one verification after another for many years now , ‘ has worked hard for the past 60 years or so , trying to keep us from being the ‘ human beings ’ we were always supposed to be… keeping us dumbed down , as the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ way to do that , over the years , was to attempt to calcify our pineal gland with just those things that it is so extremely sensitive to : In this week ’ s episode , I am equating this with most people ’ s inability/motivation to attempt to even research enough to heal themselves… Food for thought .
What happened to me this week was exactly that : An Awakening of sorts… As I worked furiously on Facebook , attempting to wake up the masses , suddenly my heart begins to pound @ @ @ @ @ @ @ really starting to wonder what was going on… No pain , no stress , then suddenly I start to write on the post or comment that I was on at that time , and ‘ I did not even recognize my own writing ( i.e .
‘ it did not come from me ’ ) ~ For anyone to whom this has ever happened , and for me quite a while ( about three hours until it started to ‘ settle ) ~ you will know what I speak of… Fascinating and absolutely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , if anyone has seen it , for such a brief moment , you are in complete and utter inner peace , going “ Wow !
” to your neighbor over coffee… “ I don ’ t know what ’ s going on , but it is sure powerful !
” , as goosebumps start to rise again… Very quickly , I need to make the point that those who go to MacDonald ’ s often , are overweight , do not pay attention to what they eat , and sometimes even IN @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they have REALITY coming soon to ‘ wake them up ’ … And then , as fast as it came , it left , bringing everything right back to ‘ normal ’ … … only that was not the end of it… The biggest sized blood clot decides to ‘ make its way out ’ at around 4-5:00 am … out of a sound sleep , after waking up fast enough to hit the John 😉 Luckily , it passed without much pain or any severe discomfort… BUT… What was the message ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ negatively… So , I believe that , since we know that the body does reject its own refuse , like a stitch inside the wound that finds its way out of the skin by itself , ( trust me , this did happen ) , I believe this to be the rejecting , the Healing process taking place , my body getting rid of what is no longer useful to it .
I want to also apologize for showing this image , but it is vital , in order to put yourself ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a day ’ ~ and doing an effective job at relaying my own , sometimes terrifying Healing Journey .
Thanks for listening and watching !
See you next week !
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

LEARN 2 UNLEARN – Return to Health (E28) – “ The Intensity of Intuition”
WATCH SHOW BELOW INTRO ARTICLE
Your Host: Luca Majno
WARNING : Graphic Image (blood clots/blood)
It really seems like my last show has just ended and I am now immediately doing another one… Why? Well, it is a combination of feeling blessed, feeling Grateful for what I have, not even knowing how long I have to live, … going blind, effectively, because, unless you are some Martial Arts expert or used to unusually deep Meditation, those HEIGHTS are quasi-unknown to the average ‘Joe’.
Welcome to this week’s Episode!
And please allow me to add a bit to that last sentence…
Those ‘Spiritual HEIGHTS’ that I just spoke of, becoming a deeper person, being more connected to your own Spirit, the Spirit of Creator/God, there are as many words to describe this state as there are different Cultures in this world…
Big Pharma, I am reasoning, after receiving one verification after another for many years now,
‘has worked hard for the past 60 years or so, trying to keep us from being the ‘human beings’ we were always supposed to be… keeping us dumbed down, as the ‘conspiracy’ states… And the best way to do that, over the years, was to attempt to calcify our pineal gland with just those things that it is so extremely sensitive to:
Fluoride
Wifi
Nano-particles of metals (chemtrails)
Glyphosate
In this week’s episode, I am equating this with most people’s inability/motivation to attempt to even research enough to heal themselves… Food for thought.
What happened to me this week was exactly that: An Awakening of sorts… As I worked furiously on Facebook, attempting to wake up the masses, suddenly my heart begins to pound louder and louder, until I was really starting to wonder what was going on… No pain, no stress, then suddenly I start to write on the post or comment that I was on at that time, and ‘I did not even recognize my own writing (i.e. ‘it did not come from me’) ~
For anyone to whom this has ever happened, and for me quite a while (about three hours until it started to ‘settle) ~ you will know what I speak of…
Fascinating and absolutely jaw-dropping, as in the movie LUCY, if anyone has seen it, for such a brief moment, you are in complete and utter inner peace, going “Wow!” to your neighbor over coffee… “I don’t know what’s going on, but it is sure powerful!”, as goosebumps start to rise again…
Very quickly, I need to make the point that those who go to MacDonald’s often, are overweight, do not pay attention to what they eat, and sometimes even IN DENIAL of their issues, well, they have REALITY coming soon to ‘wake them up’…
And then, as fast as it came, it left, bringing everything right back to ‘normal’…
… only that was not the end of it…
The biggest sized blood clot decides to ‘make its way out’ at around 4-5:00 am … out of a sound sleep, after waking up fast enough to hit the John 😉
Luckily, it passed without much pain or any severe discomfort… BUT… What was the message?
I will not allow myself to think negatively… So, I believe that, since we know that the body does reject its own refuse, like a stitch inside the wound that finds its way out of the skin by itself, (trust me, this did happen), I believe this to be the rejecting, the Healing process taking place, my body getting rid of what is no longer useful to it.
I want to also apologize for showing this image, but it is vital, in order to put yourself ‘in someone else’s moccasins for a day’ ~ and doing an effective job at relaying my own, sometimes terrifying Healing Journey.
••••
Watch this revealing presentation …

Thanks for listening and watching!
See you next week!
••••
More Episodes of LEARN 2 UNLEARN
••••
ABOUT THE LEARN 2 UNLEARN HOST
Your Show Host: Luca Majno is the TLB Project Media Technical Director, an investigative journalist, researcher and passionate advocate of Indigenous People (The Original People), of their ‘Turtle Island’ which is now North America. Born in Boston, Ma. and raised in Geneva, Switzerland, he has lived for the last 25 years in Canada, where his activism started, and has since lived in Tennessee and Keokuk, Iowa, where he now resides. Exposing past and present crimes of any nature is a sure way to change the course of humanity towards a brighter future.
Follow Luca on facebook @ learn2unlearn
Email: [email protected]
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.