thelibertybeacon--2020-12-04--Slavery Or Renaissance: The Two Futures Facing America

Donald Trump ’ s first term drew out the entrenched deep state into the light .
An entire system of corruption is being torn down .
Despite the best efforts of the deep state , seeds of a new renaissance have already been planted .
There are two futures facing mankind in the waning hours of 2020 ; An anti-human world dominated by high tech tyranny , or a pro-human future that could see mankind literally reach for the stars .
Mankind , at this stage in our history , has reached a point in which the many roles that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ delegated to others .
Our ancestors hunted for their food ; We buy it prepackaged at Wal-Mart .
Most men fought to defend the tribe ; Now a small percentage of warriors know the reality of war .
Our ancestors built their homes ; Now someone else builds them for us .
In short , the raw reality of survival and the fragility of life has been lost on the majority of modern mankind .
These luxuries are by no means a bad thing , but to take them for granted and fall @ @ @ @ @ @ @ healthy .
Because of the sacrifices of our ancestors , we have fallen into a state of complacency , and we all tend to ignore or at the very least downplay serious threats to our way of life .
The real driving force of the past 100 years has been a massive project launched in the early 19th Century ( rooted in an idea over 2,000 years old ) that injected an anti-human philosophy into every western institution .
Globalist social engineering programs – seeded with money from tax exempt foundations – infiltrated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , scientific , corporate , governmental , and religious institutions were all touched by its influence .
Eugenics and population reduction was a primary goal .
America has awakened to the deep seeded corruption of the deep state .
The next phase could be a spiritual and cultural renewal that may propel us to the next level .
Our civilization is made up of individuals , each one of them with free will .
We can course-correct and spark a new renaissance that views human beings as having immortal souls with innate value @ @ @ @ @ @ @ individuals instead of creating victims .
Our conscience and morality stand in the way of an iron fist exercising its power through its various branches of control , all of which consist of human beings like you and me .
The solution begins with individuals deciding to think for themselves , leading by example , and carrying the fire of humanity and goodness into the future .
The world is in desperate need of these people .
You are the answer .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential @ @ @ @ @ @ @ grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ owner .

Slavery Or Renaissance: Two Futures Face America
By: Daniel Taylor
A second term for President Trump could inspire the free people of the world to course-correct, rediscover foundational moral principles and fight against institutional anti-humanism. A Biden presidency would allow the full implementation of the planned-opolis hell world of United Nations rule.
Donald Trump’s first term drew out the entrenched deep state into the light. An entire system of corruption is being torn down.
Despite the best efforts of the deep state, seeds of a new renaissance have already been planted.
There are two futures facing mankind in the waning hours of 2020; An anti-human world dominated by high tech tyranny, or a pro-human future that could see mankind literally reach for the stars.
Mankind, at this stage in our history, has reached a point in which the many roles that our ancestors took upon themselves are now delegated to others. Our ancestors hunted for their food; We buy it prepackaged at Wal-Mart. Most men fought to defend the tribe; Now a small percentage of warriors know the reality of war. Our ancestors built their homes; Now someone else builds them for us.
In short, the raw reality of survival and the fragility of life has been lost on the majority of modern mankind. These luxuries are by no means a bad thing, but to take them for granted and fall into a state of complacency is not healthy.
Because of the sacrifices of our ancestors, we have fallen into a state of complacency, and we all tend to ignore or at the very least downplay serious threats to our way of life.
In this environment, predatory humans – divorced from natural law – have placed themselves in positions of power and treat the vast majority of humanity as lab rats in a cage.
The real driving force of the past 100 years has been a massive project launched in the early 19th Century (rooted in an idea over 2,000 years old) that injected an anti-human philosophy into every western institution. Globalist social engineering programs – seeded with money from tax exempt foundations – infiltrated every level of our society. Academic, scientific, corporate, governmental, and religious institutions were all touched by its influence. Eugenics and population reduction was a primary goal.
The overarching ethos of this program was essentially anti human. It views humans as soul-less animals to be manipulated and eliminated by a technocratic elite in pursuit of power.
America has awakened to the deep seeded corruption of the deep state. The next phase could be a spiritual and cultural renewal that may propel us to the next level.
Our civilization is made up of individuals, each one of them with free will.
We can course-correct and spark a new renaissance that views human beings as having immortal souls with innate value and potential.
We can build up individuals instead of creating victims.
Our conscience and morality stand in the way of an iron fist exercising its power through its various branches of control, all of which consist of human beings like you and me. The solution begins with individuals deciding to think for themselves, leading by example, and carrying the fire of humanity and goodness into the future. The world is in desperate need of these people.
You are the answer.
Should Trump win the 2020 Presidential election, America has the chance to be a shining light of freedom to the rest of the world.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-04--Majority Polled opposed to Big Tech’s speech regulations [Pod Cast w/Scott Rasmussen]

A solid majority of U.S. voters take a negative or oppositional view of Big Tech ’ s speech-control regulations on its multiple social media platforms , according to a new Just the News Daily Poll with Scott Rasmussen .
Over a third of the surveyed voters , 36 % , said the major tech companies – which would include the owners of social media giants like Facebook and Twitter – are “ biased , and have gone too far in infringing free speech.
” Twenty-eight percent said that such companies “ have good intentions but don ’ t belong in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 18 % said the companies are doing “ a good job protecting the public from falsehoods.
” To see this poll ’ s cross-demographic tabulations , click here .
To see this poll ’ s methodology and sample demographics , click here .
• Just the News Daily Poll with Scott Rasmussen • To see this poll ’ s cross-demographic tabulations , click here .
• To see this poll ’ s methodology and sample demographics , ( TLB ) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News Some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ TLB ) Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment Policy : As a privately owned web site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .
Disclaimer : The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including , but not limited to , text , graphics , images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction .
Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice , diagnosis or treatment .

Majority of Voters Opposed to Big Tech’s Speech regulations
Fewer than one-fifth are supportive of tech’s speech controls.
By Daniel Payne
A solid majority of U.S. voters take a negative or oppositional view of Big Tech’s speech-control regulations on its multiple social media platforms, according to a new Just the News Daily Poll with Scott Rasmussen.
Over a third of the surveyed voters, 36%, said the major tech companies – which would include the owners of social media giants like Facebook and Twitter – are “biased, and have gone too far in infringing free speech.”
Twenty-eight percent said that such companies “have good intentions but don’t belong in the business of speech regulation.”
Just 18% said the companies are doing “a good job protecting the public from falsehoods.”
Just the News Daily Poll With Scott Rasmussen
Tech companies have been the focus of much scrutiny and criticism during the 2020 presidential election cycle, with critics arguing they selectively policed or censured information in ways designed to downplay and silence conservative voices.
__________
THE FACTS INSIDE OUR REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK
Links
*********
(TLB) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News
Header image credit/Logos of big tech companies (DENIS CHARLET/Getty)
Some emphasis and pictorial content added by (TLB)
Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-04--KEN’S CORNER: I Am an American By Both Right & Privilege

KEN ’ S CORNER : I Am an American By Both Right & Privilege These rights and privileges are mine : I may think as I please .
What I hold in my mind belongs entirely to me .
I may speak and write as I please , so long as I do not interfere with the rights of others to do the same .
However , the promotion of unwarranted and unjustified hatred , promoted by propaganda and overt lies should not be tolerated in a society where Liberty from Tyranny is sought .
Truth should be our primary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decision can be made… I have the right to vote .
By my vote I choose the public officers who are really my servants .
No corporation conglomerate , banking consortium , or international government should be allowed to influence , pressure , coerce , or select any elected official , and no dual citizen should ever be allowed to hold public office .
When we allow any of this , our country no longer belongs to we the people .
I have the right to choose my work , and to seek @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ability have fitted me .
No person should be chosen by government mandate , be it race or creed , over those more qualified .
Integration or segregation should be chosen entirely by the individual , as the promotion of conscious awareness should not be influenced by government , and yet , all individuals , including myself , are protected by our Bill of Rights and our Constitution… I have the right to try to improve my lot through various means , but those decisions and repercussions are my responsibility only .
Government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I have the right to a prompt trial by jury if I should be accused of a crime , with due process according to our Democratic Republic based on Constitutional Law .
I may seek justice in the courts where I have equal rights with others .
I have the privilege of sharing in the benefits of many of the natural resources of my country , but I have no right to any of them .
At the end of this essay I will explain why… I may educate my children in free @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to educate my children in any way I deem fit , including home school , private or parochial .
However , there should be some form of universal or common criteria and testing as a gauge of accomplishment , for participation in the market place .
If that form of education does not ascribe to the general description of what a formal edification is , a free market should not be mandated to hire them .
I have the right to worship as I think best , so long as I do not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do the same .
Faith is very precious and personal , and no religion should demean or make demands on another faith… unless however , that faith threatens me personally , or my ability to worship as I see fit .
Respect for the differences of faiths are universal in a free and open society , and those who can not coexist extracted .
I have the right to “ life , liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
” These are great aspirations , but in no way are they guaranteed , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accountable by law… happenstance , chance , accidents and coincidences can thwart a positive outcome , and so can not be assured .
I am responsible for my decisions , and no one but me accountable for my mistakes , or an accident .
Author ’ s note : It is good to contemplate the difference between what is held as a right , and what is defined as a privilege .
Different mindsets can ascribe the origin of a right fundamentally , but most will agree that it is not granted my @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a mandate .
People of faith seem to agree that it is God given , and others that it is universal , natural , and fundamental to what we ascribe as human .
An assessment of privilege , however , takes another road , and I think most all will agree that it originates from civilization , or society , and yet , not always considered of the highest order , as promoted by morals and ethics .
An example of rights might be freedom of speech , and a privilege akin to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , it is our duty to learn these things , to discuss , debate , and ponder them to the point of truth .
Sometimes in our society , however , we seem to mix up these two concepts , and the ongoing abortion debate is a case in point .
Is having an abortion a right , or a privilege ?
If one can not draw the line on where a life begins , isn ’ t it immoral to guess ?
And so , that particular law , protecting the mother @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not ascribed by morals and ethics , but by man-made mandate .
From the Author , Ken La Rive – We in the Liberty movement have been fighting to take back this country for less than a decade , peacefully and with the love of God and country in our hearts .
Our banner has been trampled on and displaced by a multitude of distractions , further eroding our nation and the cause for Liberty .
And so , as we are pulled by forces we can not fathom , powerful entities with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unaccountable trillions printed out of thin air and put on our backs as debt , we must formulate the most pitiful of all questions any patriot might ask in the final hour : Are we going to fight for our master ’ s tyranny , or are we going to demand the return of our civil liberties and Constitution ?
Are we going to choose The Banner of Liberty , or the shackles of voluntary servitude ?
Will it be a war for corporate profit , or a war to regain our ability @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and toil of our forefathers presented to us , their children , as a gift ?
I fear that decision is emanate .
I fear that any decision will be a hard one , but my greatest fear of all is that the decision has already been made for us .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

KEN’S CORNER: I Am an American By Both Right & Privilege
By TLB Contributing Writer: Ken LaRive
These rights and privileges are mine:
I may think as I please. What I hold in my mind belongs entirely to me.
I may speak and write as I please, so long as I do not interfere with the rights of others to do the same. However, the promotion of unwarranted and unjustified hatred, promoted by propaganda and overt lies should not be tolerated in a society where Liberty from Tyranny is sought. Truth should be our primary goal, as without it no viable decision can be made…
I have the right to vote. By my vote I choose the public officers who are really my servants. No corporation conglomerate, banking consortium, or international government should be allowed to influence, pressure, coerce, or select any elected official, and no dual citizen should ever be allowed to hold public office. When we allow any of this, our country no longer belongs to we the people.
I have the right to choose my work, and to seek any job for which my experience and ability have fitted me. No person should be chosen by government mandate, be it race or creed, over those more qualified. Integration or segregation should be chosen entirely by the individual, as the promotion of conscious awareness should not be influenced by government, and yet, all individuals, including myself, are protected by our Bill of Rights and our Constitution…
I have the right to try to improve my lot through various means, but those decisions and repercussions are my responsibility only. Government has no jurisdiction to bail me out…
I have the right to a prompt trial by jury if I should be accused of a crime, with due process according to our Democratic Republic based on Constitutional Law.
I may seek justice in the courts where I have equal rights with others.
I have the privilege of sharing in the benefits of many of the natural resources of my country, but I have no right to any of them. At the end of this essay I will explain why…
I may educate my children in free schools, government run, or choose to educate my children in any way I deem fit, including home school, private or parochial. However, there should be some form of universal or common criteria and testing as a gauge of accomplishment, for participation in the market place. If that form of education does not ascribe to the general description of what a formal edification is, a free market should not be mandated to hire them.
I have the right to worship as I think best, so long as I do not inhibit others of a differing mindset to do the same. Faith is very precious and personal, and no religion should demean or make demands on another faith… unless however, that faith threatens me personally, or my ability to worship as I see fit. Respect for the differences of faiths are universal in a free and open society, and those who cannot coexist extracted.
I have the right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” These are great aspirations, but in no way are they guaranteed, and though rights and privileges can be held accountable by law… happenstance, chance, accidents and coincidences can thwart a positive outcome, and so cannot be assured. I am responsible for my decisions, and no one but me accountable for my mistakes, or an accident.
••••
Author’s note: It is good to contemplate the difference between what is held as a right, and what is defined as a privilege. Different mindsets can ascribe the origin of a right fundamentally, but most will agree that it is not granted my men, their laws, or even a mandate. People of faith seem to agree that it is God given, and others that it is universal, natural, and fundamental to what we ascribe as human. An assessment of privilege, however, takes another road, and I think most all will agree that it originates from civilization, or society, and yet, not always considered of the highest order, as promoted by morals and ethics. An example of rights might be freedom of speech, and a privilege akin to having a driver’s license… sure, it is our duty to learn these things, to discuss, debate, and ponder them to the point of truth. Sometimes in our society, however, we seem to mix up these two concepts, and the ongoing abortion debate is a case in point. Is having an abortion a right, or a privilege? If one cannot draw the line on where a life begins, isn’t it immoral to guess? And so, that particular law, protecting the mother’s right to choose, is not ascribed by morals and ethics, but by man-made mandate.
••••
“Life is a gift, and it offers us the privilege, opportunity, and responsibility to give something back by becoming more.” -Tony Robbin
••••
“The privilege of a lifetime is being who you are.” -Joseph Campbell
••••
Thomas Payne, The Rights of men
••••
••••
From the Author, Ken La Rive – We in the Liberty movement have been fighting to take back this country for less than a decade, peacefully and with the love of God and country in our hearts. Our banner has been trampled on and displaced by a multitude of distractions, further eroding our nation and the cause for Liberty. And so, as we are pulled by forces we cannot fathom, powerful entities with unlimited resources stolen from our future, unaccountable trillions printed out of thin air and put on our backs as debt, we must formulate the most pitiful of all questions any patriot might ask in the final hour: Are we going to fight for our master’s tyranny, or are we going to demand the return of our civil liberties and Constitution? Are we going to choose The Banner of Liberty, or the shackles of voluntary servitude? Will it be a war for corporate profit, or a war to regain our ability to self govern, as the blood and toil of our forefathers presented to us, their children, as a gift? I fear that decision is emanate. I fear that any decision will be a hard one, but my greatest fear of all is that the decision has already been made for us.
••••
Checkout TLBTalk.com:
Click Here to Visit the TLBTalk.com Site
••••
Welcome to the TLB Project Neighborhood
TLBTalk – Republic Broadcasting Network – The Liberty Beacon – The Butcher Shop
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-04--COVID Hypothesis. What’s going on now?

COVID Hypothesis. What’s going on now?

Vaccines properly and responsibly trialled and tested are quite possibly ( possibly ) a boon to mankind .
Peering into the blizzard of “ data ” that emanates from the COVID Hoax orchestrated by the government and other agencies of Suppression Central , we have to squint our eyes a bit in an effort to read what the treacherous swine are up to , The sudden “ miraculous ” appearance of all manner of dodgy vaccines all at once , ordered in advance of approval and breathlessly eulogised by the Prime Moron is a case in point .
Much of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ returning bazillions of “ positives ” that are then interpreted by the propagandists as “ cases ” .
This now stands exposed as a knowing fraud executed with malice aforethought on account of the fact that the PCR test can not detect a live virus and actually detects remnants of DNA from previous and often long-ago infections of Coronaviruses such as flu , the common cold and COVID19 and so forth .
It has been a useful tool for the spreading of misinformation but that is coming to an end .
Court cases @ @ @ @ @ @ @ credibility loom .
There has already been a court case in Portugal where lockdowns and so forth were declared unlawful as they were based on the fraudulent PCR test .
The gov can no longer milk the PCR test and needs to ditch it now before its whole caper is totally shredded .
A new test is being brought in , the Lateral Flow Test ( LFT ) which , being apparently a bit more accurate , will expose further the fraud that has been going on .
Rely on the government , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from British Intelligence ( Brigade 77 etc ) and so forth , to try to lie its way out of it but generally speaking the Hoax ’ s days are numbered .
One – but perhaps not the only – goal of the Hoax has been to create an excuse for the gov to use taxpayers ’ billions to buy lots of vaccines we don ’ t really need and which have not by any stretch of the imagination been properly trialled and tested with due diligence .
So the game now is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shoddy , cheap and nasty products ( the vaccines ) purchased , taxpayer billions spent , vaccine companies enriched etc etc before the whole caper folds up .
When it does , the manufacturers and vested interests will be laughing all the way to the bank .
The citizenry will be left to pick up the tab and suffer the fallout – but they are just cattle so it doesn ’ t matter .
Boris and his henchmen will be well looked after , steered clear of prosecutions ( they hope ) and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ minions to be thrown to the wolves .
There is no loyalty or honour amongst psychopaths .
If the rushed vaccines kill or maim people , the manufacturers have been protected from prosecution by their pals in gov .
The deaths and illness will in any case be blamed on a “ new virus ” or a “ mutation of the existing one ” or some such ruse .
Those who die or suffer – and the first to be injected – will be the vulnerable such as the elderly and in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will be blamed on their pre-existing condition .
The government however will , if this version of culling occurs , save millions on pensions , NHS costs etc and the money can be put to better use further enriching it pals .
Hence , the rush to get those vaccines being ordered and paid for come what may .
Hence the mind-boggling irresponsibility and recklessness of the rushed vaccines and the muppets selling them to the people via government “ briefings ” .
The flock is being fleeced with cynical abandon by criminal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small @ @ @ @ @ @ @ support and your considerations … ( TLB )

by Kieron McFadden
Vaccines properly and responsibly trialled and tested are quite possibly (possibly) a boon to mankind.
Peering into the blizzard of “data” that emanates from the COVID Hoax orchestrated by the government and other agencies of Suppression Central, we have to squint our eyes a bit in an effort to read what the treacherous swine are up to,
The sudden “miraculous” appearance of all manner of dodgy vaccines all at once, ordered in advance of approval and breathlessly eulogised by the Prime Moron is a case in point.
Here’s my hypothesis:
The COVID hoax is steadily unravelling.
Much of it has hinged upon the PCR tests returning bazillions of “positives” that are then interpreted by the propagandists as “cases”.
This now stands exposed as a knowing fraud executed with malice aforethought on account of the fact that the PCR test cannot detect a live virus and actually detects remnants of DNA from previous and often long-ago infections of Coronaviruses such as flu, the common cold and COVID19 and so forth.
It has been a useful tool for the spreading of misinformation but that is coming to an end.
Court cases, lawsuits and the general shattering of credibility loom.
There has already been a court case in Portugal where lockdowns and so forth were declared unlawful as they were based on the fraudulent PCR test.
The gov can no longer milk the PCR test and needs to ditch it now before its whole caper is totally shredded.
A new test is being brought in, the Lateral Flow Test (LFT) which, being apparently a bit more accurate, will expose further the fraud that has been going on.
Rely on the government, with helpful instructions from its psyop handlers from British Intelligence (Brigade 77 etc) and so forth, to try to lie its way out of it but generally speaking the Hoax’s days are numbered.
One – but perhaps not the only – goal of the Hoax has been to create an excuse for the gov to use taxpayers’ billions to buy lots of vaccines we don’t really need and which have not by any stretch of the imagination been properly trialled and tested with due diligence.
So the game now is to get those dodgy, quickied, shoddy, cheap and nasty products (the vaccines) purchased, taxpayer billions spent, vaccine companies enriched etc etc before the whole caper folds up.
When it does, the manufacturers and vested interests will be laughing all the way to the bank. The citizenry will be left to pick up the tab and suffer the fallout – but they are just cattle so it doesn’t matter.
Boris and his henchmen will be well looked after, steered clear of prosecutions (they hope) and so on, although expect a few minions to be thrown to the wolves. There is no loyalty or honour amongst psychopaths.
If the rushed vaccines kill or maim people, the manufacturers have been protected from prosecution by their pals in gov. The deaths and illness will in any case be blamed on a “new virus” or a “mutation of the existing one” or some such ruse.
Those who die or suffer – and the first to be injected – will be the vulnerable such as the elderly and in a reversal of the current line their deaths will be blamed on their pre-existing condition. The government however will, if this version of culling occurs, save millions on pensions, NHS costs etc and the money can be put to better use further enriching it pals.
Hence, the rush to get those vaccines being ordered and paid for come what may.
Hence the mind-boggling irresponsibility and recklessness of the rushed vaccines and the muppets selling them to the people via government “briefings”.
The flock is being fleeced with cynical abandon by criminal lunatics.
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-04--Not One but TWO Effective, Safe and Inexpensive Cures for Covid Exist [VIDEO]

Ivermectin has not received the publicity of Hydroxychloroquine .
And we ’ re left to wonder why .
Is it a case of there being in fact too many real-world options available to treat covid than just the vaccine ?
Is the narrative easier to frame if it ’ s just presented as X vs. Y – vaccine vs. HCQ ?
We ’ re not sure , but overlooking ivermectin , an obviously very effective drug treatment used around the world , is curious .
We ’ re using Paul Craig Roberts ’ recent piece in which he republishes Dr. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Belgian health authorities .
That includes a link to a recent Egyptian study showing the superior efficacy of ivermectin over HCQ .
Second , a report from French site Le Libre Penseur making essentially the same point about rendering ivermectin invisible .
It includes review of research , especially coming out of Brazil where ivermectin was already being used , as well as the effective research of Dr. Pierre Kory , an American critical care physician .
We bumped into this short piece from Indian Express from August 2020 regarding the replacement of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Uttar Pradesh for the treatment of covid .
See UP : New Protocol Ivermectin to Replace HCQ in Treatment of Covid Patients .
A major researcher in this area turns out to be Dr. Pierre Kory , who discusses this strange phenomenon of silence about ivermectin , as well as the refinement of protocols using this drug successfully .
See Dr. Pierre Kory Talks Covid-19 , Ivermectin and the FLCCC | Podcast E43 .
Here ’ s his youtube commentary for as long as it stays up : Interestingly , he discusses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ least , it hasn ’ t shown itself to be as effective as ivermectin .
If this is so , we wonder if allowing HCQ to be the vaccine-alternative has DELIBERATELY quoshed publicity for a drug that is known to be considerably better .
Effective treatment and prevention is available for COVID-19 Two Effective , Safe , and Inexpensive Cures for Covid Exist I have published previous letters from the virologist Marc Wathelet to the Belgian health authorities about Covid .
In this one he points out that effective threatment and prevention are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ results in more deaths , and that the vaccine itself is problematic .
Effective treatment and prevention is available for COVID-19 .
In these difficult times , I would like to draw your attention to a treatment that could make a huge difference to the health of people who find themselves infected with the new coronavirus in Belgium .
It is ivermectin , a well-known and well-understood drug discovered in 1975 that is on the WHO essential drugs list .
It is used in humans to treat infections with many types of parasites @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This is one of the drugs that warranted clinical trials to test its effectiveness against COVID-19 , as I suggested last April https : //tinyurl.com/yyzyoe7n , but we did nothing .
An unpublished study ( preprint ) from Egypt compares the effects of ivermectin to those of hydroxychloroquine .
The results are spectacular !
https : //www.trialsitenews.com/benha-university-breakthrough-randomized-controlled-trial-shows-ivermectin-effective-for-treating-covid-19-as-prophylaxis/ The standard treatment for COVID in several African countries , including Egypt , is the combination of hydroxychloroquine , azithromycin and Zinc .
This study compares this treatment with the combination of ivermectin , azithromycin and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 100 individuals each , where moderate and severe forms of the disease are treated with either of these two drug combinations .
They measure the percentage improvement in symptoms and decrease in viral load , and the number of deaths ( which comes down to a percentage since there are 100 patients per arm ) .
Here is the summary of the results obtained : With such clear results , now is the time to show vision !
Please also see this article that reviews clinical trials with this molecule around the world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the experts who advise you to confirm that the benefit / risk ratio of this therapeutic approach is largely in favor of its use for severe forms of the disease .
It is essential that this treatment becomes immediately available in hospitals to treat severe forms .
It is not a question of verifying this study with new studies before making this decision , while we have an average of almost 200 daily deaths due to COVID in Belgium over the last week , and therefore an excess mortality ~ 65 % @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t have time !
Its use in moderate forms of the disease requires a confirmatory study , but this drug should be available for prescription by front-line doctors when medical supervision can be ensured to monitor for potential side effects .
This medicine is only available in our country in its topical formulation , as a cream ( Soolantra® ) .
It is possible to obtain the necessary formulation , 3 or 6 mg tablets for oral administration from neighboring countries , but our pharmacies are not supplied .
I therefore recommend that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of ivermectin in our country ; 2 ) ensure the supply of our pharmacies with this essential drug ; 3 ) ensure the transmission of this information to hospitals ; and 4 ) organize the necessary trials to confirm or deny its usefulness on the front line for moderate disease .
We must have the lucidity to recognize that this is a “ game-changer ” and that a very rapid response from the government would limit the harmful consequences of the mismanagement of the health crisis from which our country has suffered until @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the vaccines in development are designed to induce mucosal immunity , the only kind of vaccine that is potentially sterilizing , and therefore likely to have an effect on the transmission of the virus .
The criteria for evaluating these candidate vaccines are limited to a reduction in symptoms but not a reduction in deaths or an effect on virus transmission : the bar is set very low to ensure their approval .
The reduction of symptoms , if achieved without serious side effects , is certainly desirable , but it is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the virus because it is the appearance of symptoms that prompts the change in individual behavior that can limit transmission .
In addition , studies are accumulating which indicate that a vitamin D deficiency favors the development of the severe form of the disease : it is a question of setting up a large information campaign to recommend that everyone supplement their diet with vitamin D. It is a very simple and inexpensive measure , which can have a very substantial effect on the morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19 .
Remember that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are significant not only for the individuals concerned and their families , but also for our health care budget .
What are we waiting for to take this simple step ?
Have we forgotten that it ’ s easier to prevent disease than to treat it ?
Please act , Minister of Health , act today : do not feed the narrative that the government does not have the interests of its people at heart , only the wishes of the lobbies !
The scandalous indifference to the proven efficacy of ivermectin Already @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the fight against the coronavirus epidemic , so what about ivermectin , which seems to have good results and yet nobody talks about it !
Analysis and graphics ( RStudio software ) by the Collectif citoyen for FranceSoir .
In treatments for Covid-19 , much has been heard about azithromycin , hydroxychloroquine , zinc , and remdesivir , a treatment that the WHO had added before it was finally discarded .
The vaccine has also had its share of attention .
However , for a vaccine to be approved by health authorities @ @ @ @ @ @ @ available .
Although there are still detractors to this option , many studies and clinicians favour AZT+HCQ triple therapy with zinc : for example , in Brazil , Dr. Wolkoff , who in his group of 4,000 doctors , gives them a free choice among various treatments .
So there has been little room for other molecules and yet there is .
In recent weeks , several randomized controlled clinical trials ( RCTs ) have concluded that ivermectin is effective as a treatment for Covid-19 .
This molecule , a broad-spectrum antiparasitic , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ saves lives at any stage of the disease and appears to be more effective in prophylaxis or early treatment .
To date , here is a presentation in the form of a “ meta-analysis ” of all* known studies on hospitalized patients .
Treatment with ivermectin in hospital reduces the risk of mortality by a factor of 3 , or even a factor of 6 if we limit ourselves to randomized , less biased studies .
*The only study not included in this “ meta-analysis ” is the French observational study by Bernigaud @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , because the absence of death does not allow the calculation of an Odds Ratio .
However , we have included it in the meta-analysis on prophylaxis .
There is an indication bias that could explain why the treatment appears less effective in observational studies compared to randomized studies ( risk reduction by “ only ” 2 instead of 6 ) .
Indeed , ivermectin is often prescribed to the most at-risk or severe patients .
Another possible explanation is that some RCTs ( Randomized Controlled Trials ) may be of poor quality @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these studies , the results are extremely robust .
Indeed , by performing a sensitivity analysis by removing any pair of studies , the result obtained remains significant in all cases .
Concretely , even removing the 2 most favorable studies for ivermectin , the results still remain very significant : In the worst case , even without taking into account the 2 most favorable studies , ivermectin would reduce mortality by 25 % .
Therefore , it is immoral and unethical not to allow access to this treatment to COVID patients .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ANSM have been approached several times for authorization of this treatment but have not responded .
Their silence is incomprehensible in the face of this mountain of evidence .
Moreover , scientific data show that ivermectin is more effective in early treatment and especially in prophylaxis .
The following meta-analysis includes all the studies in prophylaxis ( post and pre-exposure ) and shows a reduction in the risk of infection of about 90 % ; this efficacy is comparable to vaccines .
( ER : We need to note that this efficacy is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ VACCINES .
To our knowledge , there is little real data forthcoming on this topic of what it is the vaccine ( s ) actually do . )
Animal studies confirm the efficacy and describe the mechanisms of action of ivermectin For example , the preprint study by Dias de Melo ( from the Pasteur Institute ) shows that the positive effect of ivermectin on the symptoms of COVID is not due to the antiviral effect ( not significant ) but mainly to its immunomodulatory effect by lowering the IL6/IL10 ratio in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in murids from Arévalo ( Institut Pasteur of Montevideo ) showing a significant effect on viral load and liver protection in early treatment .
These studies would lead to the conclusion that there is an urgent need to generalize this treatment , and to initiate it on an outpatient basis , especially for those most at risk The risk/benefit balance is clearly in favor of ivermectin .
Ivermectin has been known since 1975 .
It has been used more than 3.5 billion times worldwide ( against scabies , river blindness and malaria ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ effects .
According to the WHO , for onchocerciasis , ivermectin is safe and can be used on a large scale .
Many Brazilian doctors have used ivermectin since the beginning of the pandemic , such as Prof. Suassuna , a renowned infectious disease specialist , and Dr. Fornaro , who have successfully treated hundreds of patients with this drug .
Dr. Fornaro tells us : In a recently published study entitled “ Review of New Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19 ” , Dr. Pierre @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the growing list of failed therapies in COVID-19 , the CCFL has recently discovered that ivermectin , an antiparasitic drug , has very potent real-world antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties against SARS-CoV-2 and COVID- 19 .
This conclusion is based on the increasing number of study results reporting efficacy , not only in in vitro and animal models , but also in numerous randomized controlled clinical trials and observational studies .
Repeatedly , large improvements in clinical outcomes have now been recorded when ivermectin is used not only as a prophylactic agent , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ severe disease states .
The following review of the existing evidence for ivermectin is based on “ emerging ” data in that , although compelling , only a minority of studies have been published in peer-reviewed journals , with the majority of results compiled from manuscripts uploaded to pre-print drug servers or published on Clinicaltrials.gov .
Dr. Pierre Kory reports that he has treated 5 outpatients to date , all recovered within 36-48 hours .
The one who had lost his taste/odor , recovered his odor/taste within 72 hours .
He has given @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of one of these patients .
None of them tested positive , none of them had any symptoms with ivermectin , although they were exposed .
Two others consulted him after using our scientific article to convince their doctors to prescribe .
One reported feeling better within 24 hours and the other within 48 hours .
A cousin who grew up in Paris and his wife , who live in Colombia , obtained ivermectin , which was already part of a local treatment protocol where he lives – both reported feeling better within @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on 10 very sick patients in intensive care – one young man on moderate to high oxygen was treated on admission to hospital or intensive care and was home within 4 days of being discharged from oxygen which he found remarkable .
The other 9 were already in intensive care and/or had very sick lungs at the time of treatment .
None of them have made any progress , but their recoveries have been , albeit in the right direction , very slow and small steps so far – none have died .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is early treatment , according to Dr. Kory .
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com

Pam Barker | Director of TLB Europe Reloaded Project
Ivermectin has not received the publicity of Hydroxychloroquine. And we’re left to wonder why. Is it a case of there being in fact too many real-world options available to treat covid than just the vaccine? Is the narrative easier to frame if it’s just presented as X vs. Y – vaccine vs. HCQ? We’re not sure, but overlooking ivermectin, an obviously very effective drug treatment used around the world, is curious. We’re using Paul Craig Roberts’ recent piece in which he republishes Dr. Marc Wathelet’s letter to the Belgian health authorities. That includes a link to a recent Egyptian study showing the superior efficacy of ivermectin over HCQ.
Second, a report from French site Le Libre Penseur making essentially the same point about rendering ivermectin invisible. It includes review of research, especially coming out of Brazil where ivermectin was already being used, as well as the effective research of Dr. Pierre Kory, an American critical care physician.
We bumped into this short piece from Indian Express from August 2020 regarding the replacement of HCQ with ivermectin in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh for the treatment of covid. See UP: New Protocol Ivermectin to Replace HCQ in Treatment of Covid Patients.
A major researcher in this area turns out to be Dr. Pierre Kory, who discusses this strange phenomenon of silence about ivermectin, as well as the refinement of protocols using this drug successfully. See Dr. Pierre Kory Talks Covid-19, Ivermectin and the FLCCC | Podcast E43. Here’s his youtube commentary for as long as it stays up:
Interestingly, he discusses HCQ and why, for him at least, it hasn’t shown itself to be as effective as ivermectin. If this is so, we wonder if allowing HCQ to be the vaccine-alternative has DELIBERATELY quoshed publicity for a drug that is known to be considerably better.
********
Effective treatment and prevention is available for COVID-19
Two Effective, Safe, and Inexpensive Cures for Covid Exist
I have published previous letters from the virologist Marc Wathelet to the Belgian health authorities about Covid. In this one he points out that effective threatment and prevention are available, that awaiting a vaccine simply results in more deaths, and that the vaccine itself is problematic.
Effective treatment and prevention is available for COVID-19.
Dear Minister of Health,
In these difficult times, I would like to draw your attention to a treatment that could make a huge difference to the health of people who find themselves infected with the new coronavirus in Belgium.
It is ivermectin, a well-known and well-understood drug discovered in 1975 that is on the WHO essential drugs list. It is used in humans to treat infections with many types of parasites and it also has antiviral activity. This is one of the drugs that warranted clinical trials to test its effectiveness against COVID-19, as I suggested last April https://tinyurl.com/yyzyoe7n, but we did nothing.
An unpublished study (preprint) from Egypt compares the effects of ivermectin to those of hydroxychloroquine. The results are spectacular! https://www.trialsitenews.com/benha-university-breakthrough-randomized-controlled-trial-shows-ivermectin-effective-for-treating-covid-19-as-prophylaxis/
The standard treatment for COVID in several African countries, including Egypt, is the combination of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and Zinc. This study compares this treatment with the combination of ivermectin, azithromycin and Zinc. It has four arms of 100 individuals each, where moderate and severe forms of the disease are treated with either of these two drug combinations.
They measure the percentage improvement in symptoms and decrease in viral load, and the number of deaths (which comes down to a percentage since there are 100 patients per arm).
Here is the summary of the results obtained:
Hydroxychloroquine, moderate forms: 74% improvement, 4 deaths
Ivermectin, moderate forms: 99% improvement, 0 deaths
Hydroxychloroquine, severe forms: 50% improvement, 20 deaths
Ivermectin, severe forms: 94% improvement, 2 deaths
With such clear results, now is the time to show vision!
Please also see this article that reviews clinical trials with this molecule around the world https://tinyurl.com/yyqbq8gw.
I am counting on the experts who advise you to confirm that the benefit / risk ratio of this therapeutic approach is largely in favor of its use for severe forms of the disease. It is essential that this treatment becomes immediately available in hospitals to treat severe forms.
It is not a question of verifying this study with new studies before making this decision, while we have an average of almost 200 daily deaths due to COVID in Belgium over the last week, and therefore an excess mortality ~ 65% at this moment. We don’t have time!
Its use in moderate forms of the disease requires a confirmatory study, but this drug should be available for prescription by front-line doctors when medical supervision can be ensured to monitor for potential side effects.
This medicine is only available in our country in its topical formulation, as a cream (Soolantra®). It is possible to obtain the necessary formulation, 3 or 6 mg tablets for oral administration from neighboring countries, but our pharmacies are not supplied.
I therefore recommend that you
1) authorize the oral form of ivermectin in our country;
2) ensure the supply of our pharmacies with this essential drug;
3) ensure the transmission of this information to hospitals; and
4) organize the necessary trials to confirm or deny its usefulness on the front line for moderate disease.
We must have the lucidity to recognize that this is a “game-changer” and that a very rapid response from the government would limit the harmful consequences of the mismanagement of the health crisis from which our country has suffered until now.
I remind you that none of the vaccines in development are designed to induce mucosal immunity, the only kind of vaccine that is potentially sterilizing, and therefore likely to have an effect on the transmission of the virus.
The criteria for evaluating these candidate vaccines are limited to a reduction in symptoms but not a reduction in deaths or an effect on virus transmission: the bar is set very low to ensure their approval. The reduction of symptoms, if achieved without serious side effects, is certainly desirable, but it is very likely to promote the transmission of the virus because it is the appearance of symptoms that prompts the change in individual behavior that can limit transmission.
In addition, studies are accumulating which indicate that a vitamin D deficiency favors the development of the severe form of the disease: it is a question of setting up a large information campaign to recommend that everyone supplement their diet with vitamin D.
It is a very simple and inexpensive measure, which can have a very substantial effect on the morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19. Remember that the consequences of sequelae associated with COVID-19 are significant not only for the individuals concerned and their families, but also for our health care budget. What are we waiting for to take this simple step? Have we forgotten that it’s easier to prevent disease than to treat it?
Please act, Minister of Health, act today: do not feed the narrative that the government does not have the interests of its people at heart, only the wishes of the lobbies!
I remain at your disposal,
Marc Wathelet, Doctor of Sciences
********
The scandalous indifference to the proven efficacy of ivermectin
LE LIBRE PENSEUR
Already hydroxychloroquine has been completely demonized as part of the fight against the coronavirus epidemic, so what about ivermectin, which seems to have good results and yet nobody talks about it!
****
Analysis and graphics (RStudio software) by the Collectif citoyen for FranceSoir.
In treatments for Covid-19, much has been heard about azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and remdesivir, a treatment that the WHO had added before it was finally discarded. The vaccine has also had its share of attention. However, for a vaccine to be approved by health authorities, there must be no alternative treatment available. Although there are still detractors to this option, many studies and clinicians favour AZT+HCQ triple therapy with zinc: for example, in Brazil, Dr. Wolkoff, who in his group of 4,000 doctors, gives them a free choice among various treatments. So there has been little room for other molecules and yet there is.
In recent weeks, several randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) have concluded that ivermectin is effective as a treatment for Covid-19. This molecule, a broad-spectrum antiparasitic, used in particular to fight scabies, saves lives at any stage of the disease and appears to be more effective in prophylaxis or early treatment.
To date, here is a presentation in the form of a “meta-analysis” of all* known studies on hospitalized patients. Treatment with ivermectin in hospital reduces the risk of mortality by a factor of 3, or even a factor of 6 if we limit ourselves to randomized, less biased studies.
Source: Dr. Pierre Kory et al: https://osf.io/wx3zn/
*The only study not included in this “meta-analysis” is the French observational study by Bernigaud (HPAE patients treated for scabies), because the absence of death does not allow the calculation of an Odds Ratio. However, we have included it in the meta-analysis on prophylaxis.
There is an indication bias that could explain why the treatment appears less effective in observational studies compared to randomized studies (risk reduction by “only” 2 instead of 6). Indeed, ivermectin is often prescribed to the most at-risk or severe patients. Another possible explanation is that some RCTs (Randomized Controlled Trials) may be of poor quality
But despite the limitations of some of these studies, the results are extremely robust. Indeed, by performing a sensitivity analysis by removing any pair of studies, the result obtained remains significant in all cases. Concretely, even removing the 2 most favorable studies for ivermectin, the results still remain very significant:
Source: Inspired by Kory et al: https://osf.io/wx3zn/
In the worst case, even without taking into account the 2 most favorable studies, ivermectin would reduce mortality by 25%. Therefore, it is immoral and unethical not to allow access to this treatment to COVID patients. The French Ministry of Health and the ANSM have been approached several times for authorization of this treatment but have not responded. Their silence is incomprehensible in the face of this mountain of evidence.
Moreover, scientific data show that ivermectin is more effective in early treatment and especially in prophylaxis.
The following meta-analysis includes all the studies in prophylaxis (post and pre-exposure) and shows a reduction in the risk of infection of about 90%; this efficacy is comparable to vaccines. (ER: We need to note that this efficacy is comparable to WHAT IS BEING CLAIMED ABOUT VACCINES. To our knowledge, there is little real data forthcoming on this topic of what it is the vaccine(s) actually do.)
Source: Kory et al (updated): https://osf.io/wx3zn/
Animal studies confirm the efficacy and describe the mechanisms of action of ivermectin
For example, the preprint study by Dias de Melo (from the Pasteur Institute) shows that the positive effect of ivermectin on the symptoms of COVID is not due to the antiviral effect (not significant) but mainly to its immunomodulatory effect by lowering the IL6/IL10 ratio in the lungs. Another example is the study in murids from Arévalo (Institut Pasteur of Montevideo) showing a significant effect on viral load and liver protection in early treatment.
These studies would lead to the conclusion that there is an urgent need to generalize this treatment, and to initiate it on an outpatient basis, especially for those most at risk
The risk/benefit balance is clearly in favor of ivermectin. Ivermectin has been known since 1975. It has been used more than 3.5 billion times worldwide (against scabies, river blindness and malaria) with rare, controlled and well-known side effects. According to the WHO, for onchocerciasis, ivermectin is safe and can be used on a large scale.
Many Brazilian doctors have used ivermectin since the beginning of the pandemic, such as Prof. Suassuna, a renowned infectious disease specialist, and Dr. Fornaro, who have successfully treated hundreds of patients with this drug. Dr. Fornaro tells us:
“I have treated more than 50 patients without complications, and none of them had to go to hospital. Patients, especially those with co-morbidities, who miss the early treatment window, are more likely to develop severe forms of covid.”
In a recently published study entitled “Review of New Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19”, Dr. Pierre Kory (pictured) writes:
“In March 2020, an expert group called the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) was created and led by Professor Paul E. Marik, to continuously review rapidly emerging basic, translational and clinical scientific evidence to better understand and develop a treatment protocol for COVID-19. At the same time, many centers and groups have used a multitude of new therapeutic agents empirically and in clinical trials, often at inappropriate times during this now well-described multi-phase disease. Either because of these frequent trial design failures, or because of their inadequate antiviral or anti-inflammatory properties, almost all of the agents tested have been shown to be ineffective in the treatment of COVID-19. Based on a recent series of negative published therapeutic study results, in particular the SOLIDARITY trial, they now virtually eliminate any role in the treatment of remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, interferon, convalescent plasma, tocilizumab and monoclonal antibodies.”
Despite the growing list of failed therapies in COVID-19, the CCFL has recently discovered that ivermectin, an antiparasitic drug, has very potent real-world antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties against SARS-CoV-2 and COVID- 19. This conclusion is based on the increasing number of study results reporting efficacy, not only in in vitro and animal models, but also in numerous randomized controlled clinical trials and observational studies. Repeatedly, large improvements in clinical outcomes have now been recorded when ivermectin is used not only as a prophylactic agent, but also in mild, moderate and even severe disease states. The following review of the existing evidence for ivermectin is based on “emerging” data in that, although compelling, only a minority of studies have been published in peer-reviewed journals, with the majority of results compiled from manuscripts uploaded to pre-print drug servers or published on Clinicaltrials.gov.
Dr. Pierre Kory reports that he has treated 5 outpatients to date, all recovered within 36-48 hours. The one who had lost his taste/odor, recovered his odor/taste within 72 hours. He has given ivermectin prophylaxis to a family of 5 of one of these patients. None of them tested positive, none of them had any symptoms with ivermectin, although they were exposed. Two others consulted him after using our scientific article to convince their doctors to prescribe. One reported feeling better within 24 hours and the other within 48 hours. A cousin who grew up in Paris and his wife, who live in Colombia, obtained ivermectin, which was already part of a local treatment protocol where he lives – both reported feeling better within 48 hours. Dr. Kory used it on 10 very sick patients in intensive care – one young man on moderate to high oxygen was treated on admission to hospital or intensive care and was home within 4 days of being discharged from oxygen which he found remarkable. The other 9 were already in intensive care and/or had very sick lungs at the time of treatment. None of them have made any progress, but their recoveries have been, albeit in the right direction, very slow and small steps so far – none have died. The key, as with everything, is early treatment, according to Dr. Kory.
Sources:
Cet article s’est inspiré de la revue systématique de Kory, Marik et coll disponible en preprint: https://osf.io/wx3zn/
Études randomisées contrôlées
Elgazzar : https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-100956/v1
Hashim : https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.10.26.20219345v1
Mahmud : https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT04523831
Niaee : https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-109670/v1
Shouman : https://clinicaltrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/61/NCT04422561/Prot_SAP_000.pdf
Etudes observationnelles
Gorial : https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.07.20145979v1
Khan : https://www.archbronconeumol.org/en-ivermectin-treatment-may-improve-pro…
Rajter : https://journal.chestnet.org/article/S0012-3692(20)34898-4/fulltext
Behera : https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.10.29.20222661v1
Carvallo : https://medicalpressopenaccess.com/upload/1605709669_1007.pdf
Bernigaud : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S015196382030627X?via%…
Études sur les animaux
Dias de Melo (Institut Pasteur) https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.21.392639v1
Arévalo https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.02.363242v1
************
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-12-04--Global Team of Experts Finds 10 FATAL FLAWS in the PCR, Demands It’s Urgently Axed

ER Editor : The useful introduction to this RT piece comes from G. Edward Griffin : A group of 22 experts across the globe examined the Corman-Drosten paper , which described a protocol for applying the PCR technique to detecting Covid-19 and they found there was no science behind it .
Problems with the Corman-Drosten paper include the fact that the PCR test can not discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments , PCR is non-specific , it is enormously variable , it has no positive or negative controls , and it has no standard operating procedure .
Eurosurveillance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 23 , 2020 , just 24 hours after it was submitted , which means it is unlikely it underwent peer review .
Experts from Europe , USA , and Japan , including senior molecular geneticists , biochemists , immunologists , and microbiologists , issued a demand to Eurosurveillance to retract the Corman-Drosten paper .
Anyone diagnosed with Covid-19 using the PCR test should not be required to isolate .
All present and previous Covid deaths , cases , and ‘ infection rates ’ should be subject to a massive retroactive inquiry .
Lockdowns @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be reviewed and relaxed .
Recently , a court in Portugal ruled against a governmental health authority that had illegally confined four people to a hotel this summer .
( ER : here is our report on this – Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests As Unreliable & Unlawful To Quarantine People . )
At least three of the authors of the Corman-Drosten paper are on the payroll of the first companies to perform PCR testing !
Two of the authors of the paper are members of the editorial board of Eurosurveillance , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Here is the independent link to the peer reviewed study that lambasts the Corman-Drosten paper : External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level : consequences for false positive results .
A global team of experts has found 10 FATAL FLAWS in the main test for Covid and is demanding it ’ s urgently axed .
As they should The Corman-Drosten paper was published on January , 23 , 2020 , just a day after being submitted , which would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ place possibly the shortest in history .
What is important about it is that the protocol it describes is used in around 70 percent of Covid kits worldwide .
It ’ s cheap , fast – and absolutely useless .
Among the fatal flaws that totally invalidate the PCR testing protocol are that the test : • can not discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments • has no positive or negative controls • does not seem to have been properly peer reviewed Oh dear .
One wonders whether anything at all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wait – it gets worse .
As has been noted previously , no threshold for positivity was ever identified .
This is why labs have been running 40 cycles , almost guaranteeing a large number of false positives – up to 97 percent , according to some studies .
The cherry on top , though , is that among the authors of the original paper themselves , at least four have severe conflicts of interest .
Two of them are members of the editorial board of Eurosurveillance , the sinisterly named journal that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ three of them are on the payroll of the first companies to perform PCR testing !
The 22 members of the consortium that has challenged this shoddy science deserve huge credit .
The scientists , from Europe , the USA , and Japan , comprise senior molecular geneticists , biochemists , immunologists , and microbiologists , with many decades of experience between them .
They have issued a demand to Eurosurveillance to retract the Corman-Drosten paper , writing : “ Considering the scientific and methodological blemishes presented here , we are confident that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other choice but to retract the publication.
’ ’ Talk about putting the pressure on .
It is difficult to overstate the implications of this revelation .
Every single thing about the Covid orthodoxy relies on ‘ case numbers ’ , which are largely the results of the now widespread PCR tests .
If their results are essentially meaningless , then everything we are being told – and ordered to do by increasingly dictatorial governments – is likely to be incorrect .
For instance , one of the authors of the review is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , in the UK , there is no ‘ second wave ’ and that the pandemic has been over since June .
Having seen the PCR tests so unambiguously debunked , it is hard to see any evidence to the contrary .
Why was this paper rushed to publication in January despite clearly not meeting proper standards ?
Why did none of the checks and balances that are meant to prevent bad science dictating public policy kick into action ?
And why did it take so long for anyone in the scientific community @ @ @ @ @ @ @ questions lead to dark ruminations , which I will save for another day .
Even more pressing is the question of what is going to be done about this now .
The people responsible for writing and publishing the paper have to be held accountable .
But also , all PCR testing based on the Corman-Drosten protocol should be stopped with immediate effect .
All those who are so-called current ‘ Covid cases ’ , diagnosed based on that protocol , should be told they no longer have to isolate .
All present @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and ‘ infection rates ’ should be subject to a massive retroactive inquiry .
And lockdowns , shutdowns , and other restrictions should be urgently reviewed and relaxed .
Because this latest blow to PCR testing raises the probability that we are not enduring a killer virus pandemic , but a false positive pseudo-epidemic .
And one on which we are destroying our economies , wrecking people ’ s livelihoods and causing more deaths than Covid-19 will ever claim .
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com The Liberty Beacon Project is now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ request permission from the copyright owner .

ER Editor: The useful introduction to this RT piece comes from G. Edward Griffin:
A group of 22 experts across the globe examined the Corman-Drosten paper, which described a protocol for applying the PCR technique to detecting Covid-19 and they found there was no science behind it. Problems with the Corman-Drosten paper include the fact that the PCR test cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments, PCR is non-specific, it is enormously variable, it has no positive or negative controls, and it has no standard operating procedure. Eurosurveillance published the Corman-Drosten paper on January, 23, 2020, just 24 hours after it was submitted, which means it is unlikely it underwent peer review. Experts from Europe, USA, and Japan, including senior molecular geneticists, biochemists, immunologists, and microbiologists, issued a demand to Eurosurveillance to retract the Corman-Drosten paper. Anyone diagnosed with Covid-19 using the PCR test should not be required to isolate. All present and previous Covid deaths, cases, and ‘infection rates’ should be subject to a massive retroactive inquiry. Lockdowns, shutdowns, and travel restrictions should be reviewed and relaxed. Recently, a court in Portugal ruled against a governmental health authority that had illegally confined four people to a hotel this summer. (ER: here is our report on this – Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests As Unreliable & Unlawful To Quarantine People.) At least three of the authors of the Corman-Drosten paper are on the payroll of the first companies to perform PCR testing! Two of the authors of the paper are members of the editorial board of Eurosurveillance, the journal that published the paper. -GEG
Here is the independent link to the peer reviewed study that lambasts the Corman-Drosten paper:
External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.
********
A global team of experts has found 10 FATAL FLAWS in the main test for Covid and is demanding it’s urgently axed. As they should
PETER ANDREWS for RT Last week, I reported on a landmark ruling from Portugal, where a court had ruled against a governmental health authority that had illegally confined four people to a hotel this summer. They had done so because one of the people had tested positive for Covid in a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test – but the court had found the test fundamentally flawed and basically inadmissible.
The Corman-Drosten paper was published on January, 23, 2020, just a day after being submitted, which would make any peer review process that took place possibly the shortest in history. What is important about it is that the protocol it describes is used in around 70 percent of Covid kits worldwide. It’s cheap, fast – and absolutely useless. The 10 deadly sins Among the fatal flaws that totally invalidate the PCR testing protocol are that the test: is non-specific, due to erroneous primer design
is enormously variable
cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments
has no positive or negative controls
has no standard operating procedure
does not seem to have been properly peer reviewed Oh dear. One wonders whether anything at all was correct in the paper. But wait – it gets worse. As has been noted previously, no threshold for positivity was ever identified. This is why labs have been running 40 cycles, almost guaranteeing a large number of false positives – up to 97 percent, according to some studies. The cherry on top, though, is that among the authors of the original paper themselves, at least four have severe conflicts of interest. Two of them are members of the editorial board of Eurosurveillance, the sinisterly named journal that published the paper. And at least three of them are on the payroll of the first companies to perform PCR testing! Heroes we deserve The 22 members of the consortium that has challenged this shoddy science deserve huge credit. The scientists, from Europe, the USA, and Japan, comprise senior molecular geneticists, biochemists, immunologists, and microbiologists, with many decades of experience between them. They have issued a demand to Eurosurveillance to retract the Corman-Drosten paper, writing: “Considering the scientific and methodological blemishes presented here, we are confident that the editorial board of Eurosurveillance has no other choice but to retract the publication.’’ Talk about putting the pressure on. It is difficult to overstate the implications of this revelation. Every single thing about the Covid orthodoxy relies on ‘case numbers’, which are largely the results of the now widespread PCR tests. If their results are essentially meaningless, then everything we are being told – and ordered to do by increasingly dictatorial governments – is likely to be incorrect. For instance, one of the authors of the review is Dr Mike Yeadon, who asserts that, in the UK, there is no ‘second wave’ and that the pandemic has been over since June. Having seen the PCR tests so unambiguously debunked, it is hard to see any evidence to the contrary. The house of cards collapses Why was this paper rushed to publication in January despite clearly not meeting proper standards? Why did none of the checks and balances that are meant to prevent bad science dictating public policy kick into action? And why did it take so long for anyone in the scientific community to challenge its faulty methodology? These questions lead to dark ruminations, which I will save for another day. Even more pressing is the question of what is going to be done about this now. The people responsible for writing and publishing the paper have to be held accountable. But also, all PCR testing based on the Corman-Drosten protocol should be stopped with immediate effect. All those who are so-called current ‘Covid cases’, diagnosed based on that protocol, should be told they no longer have to isolate. All present and previous Covid deaths, cases, and ‘infection rates’ should be subject to a massive retroactive inquiry. And lockdowns, shutdowns, and other restrictions should be urgently reviewed and relaxed. Because this latest blow to PCR testing raises the probability that we are not enduring a killer virus pandemic, but a false positive pseudo-epidemic. And one on which we are destroying our economies, wrecking people’s livelihoods and causing more deaths than Covid-19 will ever claim. ************ Source Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.