thelibertybeacon--2020-10-31--What You Need to Know About the ‘GREAT RESET’

What You Need to Know About ‘ the Great Reset ’ By now , you ’ ve probably started hearing world leaders speak of “ the Great Reset , ” 1 “ the Fourth Industrial Revolution ” 2 and the call to “ Build Back Better.
” 3 One example among many is this speech by Matt Hancock , British Minister for Digital , Culture , Media & Sport , given during an All-Party Parliamentary Group meeting on the Fourth Industrial Revolution in 2017:4 “ One of the roles of Parliament is to cast ahead … and tackle the great @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the technologies is materially different to what has come before .
In the past , we ’ ve thought of consumption as a one-off , and capital investment as additive .
Yet put resources into the networks that now connect half the world , or into AI , and the effects are exponential … I ’ m delighted to speak alongside so many impressive colleagues who really understand this , and alongside Professor Klaus Schwab who literally ‘ wrote the book ’ on the 4th Industrial Revolution .
Your work , bringing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ minds on the planet , has informed what we are doing … Our Digital Strategy , embedded within the wider Industrial Strategy , sets out the seven pillars on which we can build our success .
And inside that fits our 5G strategy , like a set of Russian Dolls .
Our Strategy covers infrastructure , skills , rules and ethics of big data use , cyber security , supporting the tech sector , the digitization of industry , and digitization of government.
” What Is the Great Reset ?
But what do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Fourth Industrial Revolution ” and “ Build Back Better ” actually mean ?
What do they refer to ?
In the October 16 , 2020 , Corbett Report5 ( below ) journalist James Corbett breaks down the new social contract planned for the world , otherwise known as “ the great reset.
” While the current pandemic is being used as a justification for the movement , the agenda has nothing to do with health and everything to do with a long-term plan to monitor and control the world through technical surveillance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will be reset to depend on digital technocracy run by self-appointed elitists .
It ’ s a power grab of unprecedented magnitude , and involves the restructuring of social classes to dismantle democracy , erase national borders and allow for the governing of communities from a distance by a group of unelected leaders .
What was in the past referred to as the “ new world order ” is now known as “ the Great Reset.
” This Great Reset not only ties you to it through an electronic ID linked to your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even gives you a “ social credit ” ID that can run every facet of your life .
This isn ’ t a lofty conspiracy theory — it ’ s real .
It ’ s happening now .
And you need to know how to fight it before it ’ s too late .
Ultimately , it ’ s a technocratic agenda that seeks to integrate mankind into a technological surveillance apparatus overseen by powerful artificial intelligence .
Ironically , while the real plan is to usher in a tech-driven dystopia free of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ plan as a way to bring us back into harmony with Nature .
If you ’ re unfamiliar with the term “ technocracy , ” be sure to go back and listen to my interview with Patrick Wood , author of “ Technocracy Rising : The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation ” and “ Technocracy : The Hard Road to World Order.
” You can also learn more on Wood ’ s website , Technocracy.news .
In a nutshell , technocracy is an economic system of resource allocation that revolves around technology — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Big Data collection — and the digitization of industry ( which includes banking ) and government , which in turn allows for the automation of social engineering and social rule , thereby doing away with the need for elected government leaders .
Your Guide to the Great Reset According to the World Economic Forum,6 the Great Reset “ will address the need for a more fair , sustainable and resilient future , and a new social contract centered on human dignity , social justice and where societal progress does not fall behind @ @ @ @ @ @ @ World Economic Forum ?
It ’ s an international organization for public-private cooperation that “ engages the foremost political , business , cultural and other leaders of society to shape global , regional and industry agendas.
” 7 The founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum is professor Klaus Schwab , who , as mentioned by Hancock in his 2017 speech , wrote the book on the Fourth Industrial Revolution .
Schwab announced the World Economic Forum ’ s Great Reset Initiative in June 2020 .
In his report , Corbett @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , as explained by Corbett , for those who forgot about what the New World Order was/is all about , it was all about “ centralization of control into fewer hands , globalization [ and ] transformation of society through Orwellian surveillance technologies.
” In other words , it ’ s technocracy , where we the people know nothing about the ruling elite while every aspect of our lives is surveilled , tracked and manipulated for their gain .
Four key take-aways from Corbett ’ s research into the Great Reset are : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to do with a virus , the COVID-19 pandemic or anything else related to public health .
2 .
The Great Reset is a coordinated agenda that has been years in the making — The pandemic is simply being used as a convenient “ cover ” for an elitist , globalist agenda that has been planned for decades .
3 .
The Great Reset is NOT the end of globalization — On the contrary , it is globalization turbo-charged .
As noted by Schwab in the policy book , “ COVID-19 : The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Malleret and cited in Corbett ’ s report : In other words , there ’ s no room for the spontaneously arising social order that occurs when people are allowed to freely interact .
Instead , there must be “ one power ” to enforce whatever the desired social-environmental-economic-geopolitical order is .
4 .
This process is not meant to end — The end of the pandemic will not be the end of this totalitarian , digital enslavement agenda .
The plan is not to “ reset ” the world back to some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to start over with a cleaner environment and more equitable social structures .
The plan is to circumvent democracy and shift global governance into the hands of the few .
As noted by Schwab in “ COVID-19 : The Great Reset ” : What might the Great Reset transformation look like ?
As noted by Corbett , the following illustration , created and released by the World Economic Forum , shows the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on various aspects of life , and how pandemic responses are transforming these areas .
If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the illustration,8 you ’ ll also find listings of publications , videos and data relating to all of these facets .
Around the 25-minute mark , Corbett explains how you can use this map to get a feel for the scope of the transformation being prepared — everything from finance , business and education to health care , human rights and global governance .
Importantly , the pandemic is being used to destroy the local economies around the world , which will then allow the World Economic Forum to come in and “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the price for this salvation is your personal freedom and liberty .
The World Economic Forum and the central banks will , through their facilitated financial bailouts , be able to effectively control most countries in the world .
And , again , one of the aspects of the technocratic plan is to eliminate nation borders and nationalism in general .
A related term to the Great Reset is “ the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
” This refers to the merging of digital , physical and biological systems .
As noted by Schwab , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we are doing , but it changes us.
” 9 What they ’ re talking about is the creation of a new economic system built around the merger of the human body and mind with machines and artificial intelligence .
In other words , technocracy — a resource-based economic system with centralized control by a technocratic elite who have the know-how to program the computer systems will ultimately dictate the lives of everyone .
Of course , it ’ s sold to us as a means to harness and elevate human potential , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ complete opposite .
Ultimately , they ’ re not just trying to change the definition of what it means to be human — they ’ re openly conspiring to alter humanity through technological means .
In addition to the sources cited earlier , Corbett also fleshed out the history of technocracy in his December 28 , 2015 , report,10 “ How Big Oil Conquered the World.
” In short , the Fourth Industrial Revolution is nothing but a rebranding of technocracy , melded with the transhumanist movement .
You can also learn more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ technocracy , by reading the June 29 , 2020 , Technocracy.news article11 “ The Elite Technocrats Behind the Global ‘ Great Reset , ’ ” and the October 12 , 2020 , Off-Guardian article,12 “ Klaus Schwab & His Great Fascist Reset.
” According to Off-Guardian,13 Schwab ensures us that “ smart ” Big Data technologies will “ ’ deliver new and innovative ways to service citizens and customers ’ and we will have to stop objecting to businesses profiting from harnessing and selling information about every aspect of our personal lives.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quoted as saying , “ Establishing trust in the data and algorithms used to make decisions will be vital ” — which about sums up the technocratic view of “ government.
” In some parts of the world , a second wave of COVID-19 is reportedly14 emerging , and according to some researchers , the best way to combat it is to implement another round of more stringent lockdown measures — a so-called “ circuit breaker ” strategy to bring the infection rate under control .
Meanwhile , other reports15 warn that while @ @ @ @ @ @ @ minority of people , so are lockdowns , thanks to the poverty , famine and mental health challenges they bring about .
According to an October 13 , 2020 , article16 in The Sun , COVID-19 restrictions “ could hurl 90 million into ‘ extreme poverty , ’ ” with the poorest nations bearing the brunt of the economic collapse .
The New York Post also recently reported17 that “ COVID-19 lockdowns were a risky experiment ” that failed , and have proven deadlier than the virus itself .
“ No ethical scientist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ carefully considering the dangers and monitoring the results , which have turned out to be dismal , ” the New York Post writes.18 “ While the economic and social harms have been enormous , it isn ’ t clear that the lockdowns have brought significant health benefits beyond what was achieved by people ’ s voluntary social distancing and other actions .
In a comparison of 50 countries , a team led by Rabail Chaudhry of the University of Toronto found that COVID-19 was deadlier in places with older populations and higher rates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) , but the mortality rate was no lower in countries that closed their borders or enforced full lockdowns .
After analyzing 23 countries and 25 U.S. states with widely varying policies , Andrew Atkeson of UCLA and fellow economists found that the mortality trend was similar everywhere once the disease took hold : The number of daily deaths rose rapidly for 20 to 30 days , then fell rapidly … The cost-benefit rationale becomes even bleaker if you use the standard metric for determining whether a drug or other intervention is worthwhile @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for each year of life being saved ?
By that metric , the lockdowns must be the most cost-ineffective intervention in the history of public health , because so many of the intended beneficiaries are near the end of life .
In America , nearly 80 percent of COVID-19 victims have been over 65 , and more than 40 percent were living in nursing homes , where the median life expectancy after admission is just five months … No one wants to hasten the demise of the elderly , but they and other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ down the rest of the society , as Sweden and other countries have demonstrated … Early in the pandemic , Scott Atlas at the Hoover Institution and researchers at Swansea University independently calculated that the lockdowns would ultimately cost more years of life than COVID-19 in the United States and Britain , and the toll seems certain to be worse in poor countries .
The World Bank estimates that the coronavirus recession could push 60 million people into extreme poverty , which inevitably means more disease and death.
” The Cure That Is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now also seeing reports19 that “ unexplained excess deaths at home ” are outpacing COVID-19 deaths by nearly 900 % , likely due to people with chronic illnesses avoiding medical care .
Unfortunately , physicians and scientists continue to butt heads when it comes to the sanest path forward .
As noted in an October 6 , 2020 , article20 in The Conversation , whether or not the coronavirus cure is worse than the disease has become “ the most divisive question of 2020 , ” with dozens of doctors signing on to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recent Kaiser Health News story21 also highlights the impact of “ pandemic stress ” on public health , as more and more people are reporting problems ranging from insomnia and excruciating headaches to hair loss and cracked teeth : As detailed in “ Coronavirus Fraud Scandal — The Biggest Fight Has Just Begun , ” an international network of legal experts and health professionals are preparing to launch the largest class-action lawsuit in history , against all those responsible for the global lockdowns , from local policy makers to the World Health Organization @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the four attorneys who founded the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee , which is leading the tort case , the COVID-19 pandemic is “ probably the greatest crime against humanity ever committed.
” Pandemic measures were intended to sow panic in order to allow for a massive transfer of wealth , and fraudulent testing has been used to keep the ruse going .
In reality , mortality statistics reveal COVID-19 has not led to an excess of deaths above the annual norm , the proposed action says , and there ’ s no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ favorable results .
While the Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee hasn ’ t specifically addressed the pandemic as a vehicle for a technocratic revolution , it highlights that it has been fraudulently used as a means for wealth transfer and elimination of basic human rights .
As noted in the June 29 , 2020 , Technocracy.news article,22 “ The Elite Technocrats Behind the Global ‘ Great Reset ” :23 As I discuss in “ The Global Takeover Is Underway , ” technocracy is inherently a technological society run through social engineering , and Big @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this .
In other words , the medical tyranny and censorship of anti-groupthink that has emerged during this pandemic are an unavoidable element of the Great Reset , and if you think it ’ s bad now , just wait until the whole system is brought fully online .
The mere idea of dissent will become a thought of the past , because your life — your health , educational and work opportunities , your finances and your very identity — will be so meshed with the automated technological infrastructure that any attempt @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being locked out or erased from the system , leaving you with no ability to learn , work , travel or purchase anything .
It sounds far-fetched , I know , but when you follow the technocratic plan to its inevitable end , that ’ s basically what you end up with .
The warning signs are all around us , if we ’ re willing to see them for what they actually are .
The only question now is whether enough people are willing to resist it to make a difference .

What You Need to Know About ‘the Great Reset’
Analysis by: Dr. Joseph Mercola
By now, you’ve probably started hearing world leaders speak of “the Great Reset,”1 “the Fourth Industrial Revolution”2 and the call to “Build Back Better.”3 One example among many is this speech by Matt Hancock, British Minister for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport, given during an All-Party Parliamentary Group meeting on the Fourth Industrial Revolution in 2017:4
“One of the roles of Parliament is to cast ahead … and tackle the great challenges of our time … The nature of the technologies is materially different to what has come before. In the past, we’ve thought of consumption as a one-off, and capital investment as additive. Yet put resources into the networks that now connect half the world, or into AI, and the effects are exponential … I’m delighted to speak alongside so many impressive colleagues who really understand this, and alongside Professor Klaus Schwab who literally ‘wrote the book’ on the 4th Industrial Revolution. Your work, bringing together as you do all the best minds on the planet, has informed what we are doing … Our Digital Strategy, embedded within the wider Industrial Strategy, sets out the seven pillars on which we can build our success. And inside that fits our 5G strategy, like a set of Russian Dolls. Our Strategy covers infrastructure, skills, rules and ethics of big data use, cyber security, supporting the tech sector, the digitization of industry, and digitization of government.”
What Is the Great Reset?
But what do the terms “Great Reset,” “Fourth Industrial Revolution” and “Build Back Better” actually mean? What do they refer to? In the October 16, 2020, Corbett Report5 (below) journalist James Corbett breaks down the new social contract planned for the world, otherwise known as “the great reset.”
“The Great Reset not only ties you to it through an electronic ID linked to your bank account and health records, but even gives you a “social credit” ID that can run every facet of your life.”
While the current pandemic is being used as a justification for the movement, the agenda has nothing to do with health and everything to do with a long-term plan to monitor and control the world through technical surveillance. In other words, the world will be reset to depend on digital technocracy run by self-appointed elitists.
It’s a power grab of unprecedented magnitude, and involves the restructuring of social classes to dismantle democracy, erase national borders and allow for the governing of communities from a distance by a group of unelected leaders. What was in the past referred to as the “new world order” is now known as “the Great Reset.”
This Great Reset not only ties you to it through an electronic ID linked to your bank account and health records, but even gives you a “social credit” ID that can run every facet of your life. This isn’t a lofty conspiracy theory — it’s real. It’s happening now. And you need to know how to fight it before it’s too late.
Ultimately, it’s a technocratic agenda that seeks to integrate mankind into a technological surveillance apparatus overseen by powerful artificial intelligence. Ironically, while the real plan is to usher in a tech-driven dystopia free of democratic controls, they speak of this plan as a way to bring us back into harmony with Nature.
If you’re unfamiliar with the term “technocracy,” be sure to go back and listen to my interview with Patrick Wood, author of “Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation” and “Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order.” You can also learn more on Wood’s website, Technocracy.news.
In a nutshell, technocracy is an economic system of resource allocation that revolves around technology — in particular artificial intelligence, digital surveillance and Big Data collection — and the digitization of industry (which includes banking) and government, which in turn allows for the automation of social engineering and social rule, thereby doing away with the need for elected government leaders.
Your Guide to the Great Reset

According to the World Economic Forum,6 the Great Reset “will address the need for a more fair, sustainable and resilient future, and a new social contract centered on human dignity, social justice and where societal progress does not fall behind economic development.”
And what is the World Economic Forum? It’s an international organization for public-private cooperation that “engages the foremost political, business, cultural and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas.”7
The founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum is professor Klaus Schwab, who, as mentioned by Hancock in his 2017 speech, wrote the book on the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Schwab announced the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset Initiative in June 2020. In his report, Corbett summarizes the Great Reset thus:
“At base, the Great Reset is nothing more, and nothing less, than a great propaganda, marketing rollout campaign for a new brand that the would-be global elite are trying to shove down the public’s throats … It’s just a fresh coat of lipstick on a very old pig. This is The New World Order, just redefined. It’s just a new label for it.”
And, as explained by Corbett, for those who forgot about what the New World Order was/is all about, it was all about “centralization of control into fewer hands, globalization [and] transformation of society through Orwellian surveillance technologies.”
In other words, it’s technocracy, where we the people know nothing about the ruling elite while every aspect of our lives is surveilled, tracked and manipulated for their gain. Four key take-aways from Corbett’s research into the Great Reset are:
1. The Great Reset has NOTHING to do with a virus, the COVID-19 pandemic or anything else related to public health.
2. The Great Reset is a coordinated agenda that has been years in the making — The pandemic is simply being used as a convenient “cover” for an elitist, globalist agenda that has been planned for decades.
3. The Great Reset is NOT the end of globalization — On the contrary, it is globalization turbo-charged. As noted by Schwab in the policy book, “COVID-19: The Great Reset,” co-written with Thierry Malleret and cited in Corbett’s report:
“If no one power can enforce order, our world will suffer from a ‘global order deficit.’ Unless individual nations and international organizations succeed in finding solutions to better collaborate at the global level, we risk entering an ‘age of entropy’ in which retrenchment, fragmentation, anger and parochialism will increasingly define our global landscape, making it less intelligible and more disorderly.”
In other words, there’s no room for the spontaneously arising social order that occurs when people are allowed to freely interact. Instead, there must be “one power” to enforce whatever the desired social-environmental-economic-geopolitical order is.
4. This process is not meant to end — The end of the pandemic will not be the end of this totalitarian, digital enslavement agenda. The plan is not to “reset” the world back to some earlier state that will allow us all to start over with a cleaner environment and more equitable social structures. The plan is to circumvent democracy and shift global governance into the hands of the few. As noted by Schwab in “COVID-19: The Great Reset”:
“When confronted with it, some industry leaders and senior executives may be tempted to equate reset with restart, hoping to go back to the old normal and restore what worked in the past: traditions, tested procedures and familiar ways of doing things — in short, a return to business as usual. This won’t happen because it can’t happen. For the most part, ‘business as usual’ died from (or at the very least was infected by) COVID-19.”
COVID-19 Transformation Map
What might the Great Reset transformation look like? As noted by Corbett, the following illustration, created and released by the World Economic Forum, shows the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on various aspects of life, and how pandemic responses are transforming these areas.
If you go to the original site for the illustration,8 you’ll also find listings of publications, videos and data relating to all of these facets. Around the 25-minute mark, Corbett explains how you can use this map to get a feel for the scope of the transformation being prepared — everything from finance, business and education to health care, human rights and global governance.
Importantly, the pandemic is being used to destroy the local economies around the world, which will then allow the World Economic Forum to come in and “rescue” debt-ridden countries.
However, the price for this salvation is your personal freedom and liberty. The World Economic Forum and the central banks will, through their facilitated financial bailouts, be able to effectively control most countries in the world. And, again, one of the aspects of the technocratic plan is to eliminate nation borders and nationalism in general.
The Fourth Industrial Revolution
A related term to the Great Reset is “the Fourth Industrial Revolution.” This refers to the merging of digital, physical and biological systems. As noted by Schwab, “It doesn’t change what we are doing, but it changes us.”9
What they’re talking about is the creation of a new economic system built around the merger of the human body and mind with machines and artificial intelligence. In other words, technocracy — a resource-based economic system with centralized control by a technocratic elite who have the know-how to program the computer systems will ultimately dictate the lives of everyone.
Of course, it’s sold to us as a means to harness and elevate human potential, when in fact it will do the complete opposite. Ultimately, they’re not just trying to change the definition of what it means to be human — they’re openly conspiring to alter humanity through technological means.
In addition to the sources cited earlier, Corbett also fleshed out the history of technocracy in his December 28, 2015, report,10 “How Big Oil Conquered the World.” In short, the Fourth Industrial Revolution is nothing but a rebranding of technocracy, melded with the transhumanist movement.

You can also learn more about Schwab, the figurehead of modern technocracy, by reading the June 29, 2020, Technocracy.news article11 “The Elite Technocrats Behind the Global ‘Great Reset,’” and the October 12, 2020, Off-Guardian article,12 “Klaus Schwab & His Great Fascist Reset.”
According to Off-Guardian,13 Schwab ensures us that “smart” Big Data technologies will “’deliver new and innovative ways to service citizens and customers’ and we will have to stop objecting to businesses profiting from harnessing and selling information about every aspect of our personal lives.”
In that article, Schwab is also quoted as saying, “Establishing trust in the data and algorithms used to make decisions will be vital” — which about sums up the technocratic view of “government.”
Coronavirus ‘Circuit Breaker’
In some parts of the world, a second wave of COVID-19 is reportedly14 emerging, and according to some researchers, the best way to combat it is to implement another round of more stringent lockdown measures — a so-called “circuit breaker” strategy to bring the infection rate under control.
Meanwhile, other reports15 warn that while COVID-19 can be deadly for a small minority of people, so are lockdowns, thanks to the poverty, famine and mental health challenges they bring about.
Lockdowns Are a Failed Experiment
According to an October 13, 2020, article16 in The Sun, COVID-19 restrictions “could hurl 90 million into ‘extreme poverty,’” with the poorest nations bearing the brunt of the economic collapse. The New York Post also recently reported17 that “COVID-19 lockdowns were a risky experiment” that failed, and have proven deadlier than the virus itself.
“No ethical scientist would conduct such a risky experiment without carefully considering the dangers and monitoring the results, which have turned out to be dismal,” the New York Post writes.18 “While the economic and social harms have been enormous, it isn’t clear that the lockdowns have brought significant health benefits beyond what was achieved by people’s voluntary social distancing and other actions. In a comparison of 50 countries, a team led by Rabail Chaudhry of the University of Toronto found that COVID-19 was deadlier in places with older populations and higher rates of obesity (like the United States), but the mortality rate was no lower in countries that closed their borders or enforced full lockdowns. After analyzing 23 countries and 25 U.S. states with widely varying policies, Andrew Atkeson of UCLA and fellow economists found that the mortality trend was similar everywhere once the disease took hold: The number of daily deaths rose rapidly for 20 to 30 days, then fell rapidly … The cost-benefit rationale becomes even bleaker if you use the standard metric for determining whether a drug or other intervention is worthwhile: How much money will society spend for each year of life being saved? By that metric, the lockdowns must be the most cost-ineffective intervention in the history of public health, because so many of the intended beneficiaries are near the end of life. In America, nearly 80 percent of COVID-19 victims have been over 65, and more than 40 percent were living in nursing homes, where the median life expectancy after admission is just five months … No one wants to hasten the demise of the elderly, but they and other vulnerable people can be shielded without shutting down the rest of the society, as Sweden and other countries have demonstrated … Early in the pandemic, Scott Atlas at the Hoover Institution and researchers at Swansea University independently calculated that the lockdowns would ultimately cost more years of life than COVID-19 in the United States and Britain, and the toll seems certain to be worse in poor countries. The World Bank estimates that the coronavirus recession could push 60 million people into extreme poverty, which inevitably means more disease and death.”
The Cure That Is Worse Than the Disease
We’re now also seeing reports19 that “unexplained excess deaths at home” are outpacing COVID-19 deaths by nearly 900%, likely due to people with chronic illnesses avoiding medical care. Unfortunately, physicians and scientists continue to butt heads when it comes to the sanest path forward.
As noted in an October 6, 2020, article20 in The Conversation, whether or not the coronavirus cure is worse than the disease has become “the most divisive question of 2020,” with dozens of doctors signing on to one side or the other.
A recent Kaiser Health News story21 also highlights the impact of “pandemic stress” on public health, as more and more people are reporting problems ranging from insomnia and excruciating headaches to hair loss and cracked teeth:
“Throughout the pandemic, people who never had the coronavirus have been reporting a host of seemingly unrelated symptoms: excruciating headaches, episodes of hair loss, upset stomach for weeks on end, sudden outbreaks of shingles and flare-ups of autoimmune disorders. The disparate symptoms, often in otherwise healthy individuals, have puzzled doctors and patients alike, sometimes resulting in a series of visits to specialists with few answers. But it turns out there’s a common thread among many of these conditions, one that has been months in the making: chronic stress. Although people often underestimate the influence of the mind on the body, a growing catalog of research shows that high levels of stress over an extended time can drastically alter physical function and affect nearly every organ system. Now, at least eight months into the pandemic, alongside a divisive election cycle and racial unrest, those effects are showing up in a variety of symptoms. ‘The mental health component of COVID is starting to come like a tsunami,’ said Dr. Jennifer Love, a California-based psychiatrist.”
The Coronavirus Fraud
As detailed in “Coronavirus Fraud Scandal — The Biggest Fight Has Just Begun,” an international network of legal experts and health professionals are preparing to launch the largest class-action lawsuit in history, against all those responsible for the global lockdowns, from local policy makers to the World Health Organization and everyone in between.
According to the four attorneys who founded the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee, which is leading the tort case, the COVID-19 pandemic is “probably the greatest crime against humanity ever committed.” Pandemic measures were intended to sow panic in order to allow for a massive transfer of wealth, and fraudulent testing has been used to keep the ruse going.
In reality, mortality statistics reveal COVID-19 has not led to an excess of deaths above the annual norm, the proposed action says, and there’s no evidence lockdowns and economic shutdowns have produced favorable results.
While the Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee hasn’t specifically addressed the pandemic as a vehicle for a technocratic revolution, it highlights that it has been fraudulently used as a means for wealth transfer and elimination of basic human rights.
As noted in the June 29, 2020, Technocracy.news article,22 “The Elite Technocrats Behind the Global ‘Great Reset”:23
“The UN Agenda 2030 with its Sustainable Development Goals is claimed to ‘ensure peace and prosperity for people and the planet.’ The actions are said to tackle poverty and hunger, bring better health and education, reduce inequalities, and save the oceans, forests and the climate. Who can argue against such benevolent goals?
But the promised Utopia comes with a price — it sets shackles on our personal freedom … The leading partners of the United Nations Global Goals project reveal the real technocratic agenda that lies behind the polished feel-good façade — it involves a plan to fully integrate mankind into a technological surveillance apparatus overseen by a powerful AI.
The current pandemic scare has been a perfect trigger to kickstart this nefarious agenda … The current COVID-19 crisis is seen by the World Economic Forum and its chairman Klaus Schwab as the perfect trigger to implement their grandiose technocratic plan. Big Tech will come to ‘rescue’ the world …
This techno-fascist recipe will then, in an utmost non-democratic fashion without any public debate or skeptic inquiry, soon be integrated into the agenda of G20 and the European Union — relabeled as the Great Green Deal …
Unsurprisingly, Klaus Schwab fails to mention his own and his cronies’ role in creating this global economic mess in the first place — as it was ‘foreseen’ with stunning accuracy in World Economic Forum’s and Bill Gate’s Event 201 (October 2019) and in the Rockefeller Foundation report24 Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development (2010).”
As I discuss in “The Global Takeover Is Underway,” technocracy is inherently a technological society run through social engineering, and Big Tech censorship is part and parcel of this. In other words, the medical tyranny and censorship of anti-groupthink that has emerged during this pandemic are an unavoidable element of the Great Reset, and if you think it’s bad now, just wait until the whole system is brought fully online.
The mere idea of dissent will become a thought of the past, because your life — your health, educational and work opportunities, your finances and your very identity — will be so meshed with the automated technological infrastructure that any attempt to break free will result in you being locked out or erased from the system, leaving you with no ability to learn, work, travel or purchase anything.
It sounds far-fetched, I know, but when you follow the technocratic plan to its inevitable end, that’s basically what you end up with. The warning signs are all around us, if we’re willing to see them for what they actually are. The only question now is whether enough people are willing to resist it to make a difference.


thelibertybeacon--2020-10-31--Liability-Free COVID Vaccine Makers Seek Additional ‘Free Pass’ From FDA

The winner of the race for approval of the first COVID-19 vaccine will get a bonus prize — the ability to pull the switch on vaccine production without having to undergo the standard mandatory safety and compliance inspection of its manufacturing facilities .
Current regulations require that before pharmaceutical companies can take their products to market , their manufacturing plants must pass a compliance inspection by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) .
The only way a company can bypass the inspection is if the FDA approves the company ’ s drug for “ emergency ” use @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Authorization is limited to situations “ when there are no adequate , approved and available alternatives.
” That ’ s why drugmakers in the running to produce a COVID-19 vaccine or therapeutic are also racing to be the first to get FDA Emergency Use Authorization — not just because it would allow them to skip the mandatory plant inspections , but also because once the FDA grants the authorization for one vaccine or one therapeutic , no other company can get it .
On Tuesday , Associated Press reported that Pfizer plans to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Albert Bourla reportedly told investors he doesn ’ t know whether Pfizer will be the first company to get that authorization .
Once a drugmaker gets emergency use authorization for a drug or vaccine , the FDA waives the mandatory manufacturing plant inspection , leaving the drug maker solely responsible for certifying the safety of the manufacturing process .
Eli Lilly , which has been working on a COVID therapeutic drug , recently had a run-in with the FDA over problems with one of its manufacturing plants .
Reuters reported earlier this month @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quality control problems ” at an Eli Lilly plant working on an antibody therapy .
A former associate counsel at the FDA told Reuters the violations were “ serious enough and have a significant enough impact on the public health that something needs to be fixed.
” If Eli Lilly wins approval of its COVID antibody drug , the company plans to partner with the Gates Foundation to send the drugs to low-and middle-income countries .
So far , no vaccine maker is yet ready to start production of a COVID vaccine , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccines have encountered problems with their clinical trials .
For example , AstraZeneca ’ s trials were halted after a trial participant developed a neurological disorder consistent with that of transverse myelitis .
Transverse myelitis often results in weakness of the limbs , problems emptying the bladder and paralysis .
Patients can become severely disabled and there is currently no effective cure .
And in May , as Children ’ s Health Defense reported , Moderna experienced a 20 % “ serious ” injury rate in one of its COVID vaccine trials : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ never been approved for use on humans — and the drugmaker ’ s manufacturing plant has never been inspected by government regulators — but the company is also in the running for FDA ’ s emergency approval , according to the Associated Press .
Pharmaceutical companies working on COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics are protected from liability for vaccine injuries under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act ( PREP Act ) .
TLB Editors Note : This is World Mercury Project on steroids !
TLB highly recommends you click on the image below @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do whatever you can to help see this vital forum succeed … for the sake of our children !
!
!
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. and the Children ’ s Health Defense .
CHD is planning many strategies , including legal , in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured .
Your support is essential to CHD ’ s successful mission .

Liability-Free COVID Vaccine Makers Seek Additional ‘Free Pass’ From FDA
The FDA’s “Emergency Use Authorization” allows drugmakers to skip inspections designed to ensure the safety of their manufacturing plants and operations.
By: Jeremy Loffredo
The winner of the race for approval of the first COVID-19 vaccine will get a bonus prize — the ability to pull the switch on vaccine production without having to undergo the standard mandatory safety and compliance inspection of its manufacturing facilities.
Current regulations require that before pharmaceutical companies can take their products to market, their manufacturing plants must pass a compliance inspection by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
The only way a company can bypass the inspection is if the FDA approves the company’s drug for “emergency” use. The FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization is limited to situations “when there are no adequate, approved and available alternatives.”
That’s why drugmakers in the running to produce a COVID-19 vaccine or therapeutic are also racing to be the first to get FDA Emergency Use Authorization — not just because it would allow them to skip the mandatory plant inspections, but also because once the FDA grants the authorization for one vaccine or one therapeutic, no other company can get it.
On Tuesday, Associated Press reported that Pfizer plans to seek emergency use authorization in November, Albert Bourla reportedly told investors he doesn’t know whether Pfizer will be the first company to get that authorization.
Once a drugmaker gets emergency use authorization for a drug or vaccine, the FDA waives the mandatory manufacturing plant inspection, leaving the drug maker solely responsible for certifying the safety of the manufacturing process.
Eli Lilly, which has been working on a COVID therapeutic drug, recently had a run-in with the FDA over problems with one of its manufacturing plants. Reuters reported earlier this month that the FDA had cited “serious quality control problems” at an Eli Lilly plant working on an antibody therapy.
A former associate counsel at the FDA told Reuters the violations were “serious enough and have a significant enough impact on the public health that something needs to be fixed.” If Eli Lilly wins approval of its COVID antibody drug, the company plans to partner with the Gates Foundation to send the drugs to low-and middle-income countries.
So far, no vaccine maker is yet ready to start production of a COVID vaccine, and several that are working on developing vaccines have encountered problems with their clinical trials.
For example, AstraZeneca’s trials were halted after a trial participant developed a neurological disorder consistent with that of transverse myelitis. Transverse myelitis often results in weakness of the limbs, problems emptying the bladder and paralysis. Patients can become severely disabled and there is currently no effective cure.
And in May, as Children’s Health Defense reported, Moderna experienced a 20% “serious” injury rate in one of its COVID vaccine trials:
“The vaccine, developed and championed by Anthony Fauci and financed by Bill Gates, used an experimental mRNA technology that the two men hoped would allow rapid deployment to meet President Trump’s ambitious “warp speed” timeline. Dr. Fauci was so confident of his shot’s safety that he waived ferret and primate studies (Moderna suspiciously reported no specific health data from its mouse studies). That appears to have been a mistake.”
Moderna’s COVID vaccine technology has never been approved for use on humans — and the drugmaker’s manufacturing plant has never been inspected by government regulators — but the company is also in the running for FDA’s emergency approval, according to the Associated Press.
Pharmaceutical companies working on COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics are protected from liability for vaccine injuries under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act).
••••
••••
TLB Editors Note: This is World Mercury Project on steroids! TLB highly recommends you click on the image below, visit this great website, and do whatever you can to help see this vital forum succeed … for the sake of our children !!! Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-01--Election 2020: Will Halloween Last for Weeks?

Will Halloween Last for Weeks ?
It ’ s the night before Halloween and all through the District of Columbia , plywood is being placed on shop and bank windows .
Not because people fear rampaging trick or treaters but because in a few days we will have our national election and those who don ’ t think they ’ ll like the results are preparing mayhem again .
If local businesses believed polls saying Biden has it in the bag , I doubt they ’ d be doing this .
I suppose you might argue they fear joyful riots @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more likely the senescent Biden will lose and the businesses here fear a continuation of the left ’ s bullying and temper tantrums .
Indeed , on a stupid pretext ( as usual ) the riots have already begun here with 14 injured policemen and more damaged businesses , businesses already reeling from the consequences of our blinkered mayor ’ s lockdowns .
There are many demonstrations planned for the nation ’ s capital in the coming week .
Here are the plans and the sponsor of one of them : “ DC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Freedom Plaza , Lafayette Park , McPhearson Square , Farragut Square between Nov. 11 through Nov. 23 .
It ’ s a free speech demonstration against the election results.
” DC Action Lab ’ s website describes itself as “ a worker-owned collective of experienced organizers trying to build a world based on equity , justice , and sustainability.
” Another group , Shutdown DC , also plans huge rallies in the Capital on Election Day .
In a stunning example of projection in support of the Democrats , the party that for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elected president , it describes the motive for its planned disruption : Shutdown D.C. still expects 10,000 people , as it indicated in its permit .
It ’ s now calling for members of multiple groups to meet at Black Lives Matter Plaza on Election Day with plans to continue the event throughout the week .
“ We are concerned like many people that ( President Donald ) Trump may try to steal this election , ” said Kaela Bamberger with Shutdown D.C. “ He ’ s given us a lot of evidence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trying to confuse the results or prematurely declare victory .
At Shutdown D.C. , we ’ re preparing to be able to mobilize quickly in D.C. if he should attempt to do so.
” The group , initially organized in 2019 in response to the call for climate change , and took part in global climate strikes in an effort to shut down traffic and block intersections in D.C. last year .
Bamberger said the group intends to make its voices heard if the democratic process is undermined .
Nancy Pelosi surely seems @ @ @ @ @ @ @ riots .
Otherwise how to explain this : I read these plans and Pelosi ’ s threat as recognition that , like myself , these people do not believe polls indicating Biden will win .
I know many of us are anxious about the results — even without the pending threat of continuing violence .
Along with partisan censorship by the Silicon Valley platforms , the propagandizing in the media has been worse than I can recall .
In the Federalist , Mollie Hemingway lets us count the ways they do it .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Here is a brief summary .
They overemphasize polls to express “ deep-seated media bias… in the hope that the polls might move public opinion rather than reflect it.
” ( Mickey Kaus has long referred to such polls and media treatment of them as “ hamburger helper polls ” ) .
“ They are downplaying Trump ’ s record of accomplishment and the enthusiasm he has from voters.
” ( If you are paying attention , thousands of people travel for many miles and stand in long lines to attend his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the few Biden or Harris “ rallies ” are almost nonexistent . )
Hemingway is right that the president ’ s biggest successes have been in foreign policy .
( That ’ s probably because the White House has the freest hand here — there ’ s not much a leftist judiciary or Congress can do to interfere with his peace and trade agreements . )
She notes how he “ eroded ISIS ’ territorial gains , ” rewrote bad trade deals , reshaped alliances in the Middle East ( successfully gelding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s options ) , he ’ s compelled NATO members to start paying their end of the deal — all of which the media has kept hidden .
Just as they ’ ve buried his successful policies “ marked by significant growth of the economy ” .
Of course , I could be wrong .
People could choose a weak , demented Biden who promises us a cold winter , energy shortages , tax increases , more lockdowns and mask mandates , increased crime and collusion with the Chinese thugs , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” instead of a candidate promising a sunny , prosperous future .
But I don ’ t think I am .
Neither , it seems , does Mark Levin , who tweeted : And then there are the effects of COVID-19 , much politicized by the Democrats , the media , Dr. Fauci , the WHO , and the CDC .
If you want to see the mechanics of how the CDC tallies up its statistics , Scott Adams , creator of Dilbert , opens the door on their Dilbert-like operation .
Check @ @ @ @ @ @ @ folderol .
If , by chance , you hope to see any meaningful statistical work by the CDC , you will quickly be disabused of that notion when you read this .
I ’ m sticking with honest analysis by better thinkers which reveals that the mortality rate from COVID-19 is not far different than an rigorous tally of mortality by other flus .
( CDC admits that many young people have died of suicide and drug overdoses as a result of the lockdowns , and their mortality rate would seem to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ response to the new flu . )
In July , the director of the CDC confirmed the higher suicide rates connected to the lockdowns — I can not imagine this trend has diminished as schools remain closed and lockdowns continue in many areas of the country : Center for Disease Control Director Robert Redfield said in a Buck Institute webinar that suicides and drug overdoses have surpassed the death rate for COVID-19 among high school students .
Redfield argued that lockdowns and lack of public schooling constituted a disproportionally negative impact on young @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there has been another cost that we ’ ve seen , particularly in high schools , ” Redfield said .
“ We ’ re seeing , sadly , far greater suicides now than we are deaths from COVID .
We ’ re seeing far greater deaths from drug overdose that are above excess that we had as background than we are seeing the deaths from COVID .
So this is why I keep coming back for the overall social being of individuals , is let ’ s all work together and find out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get these schools open in a way that people are comfortable and their safe.
” Roughly 146,000 people have died from COVID or COVID-related causes in the U.S. , according to CDC data .
The most recent publicized federal data records 48,000 deaths from suicide and at least 1.4 million attempts in 2018 .
In 2019 , almost 71,000 people died from drug overdoses .
Historical trends give reason to believe the suicide rate may rise due to extenuating [ sic ] circumstances caused by COVID-19 , including unemployment and social isolation .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Great Recession in 2008 , the rate in America was 6.4 percent higher than expected .
While the rate didn ’ t ’ “ skyrocket , ” as some have predicted it will this year , the coronavirus pandemic and economic shutdown has dealt a worse blow to the U.S. psyche .
Thirty to 40 million jobs have been lost to the economic shutdown , compared to 2.6 million in 2008 .
Maybe the Democrats and their media running dogs thought it was brilliant to overplay the threat of COVID in an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it the President ’ s re-election chances .
But the economy is fast rebounding in an astonishingly swift recovery — 33.1 % growth in GDP for the third quarter of this year , the best GDP growth in history — and it appears they ’ ve terrified their supporters more than their opponents .
A few weeks ago , I had minor eye surgery and had to go through a COVID test , a temperature reading , hand sanitizing , and masking for a ten-minute procedure .
Disgusted with all these theatrics , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thought we ’ d have to endure this nonsense .
He responded “ November 4th.
” The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

Will Halloween Last for Weeks?
By: Clarice Feldman
It’s the night before Halloween and all through the District of Columbia, plywood is being placed on shop and bank windows. Not because people fear rampaging trick or treaters but because in a few days we will have our national election and those who don’t think they’ll like the results are preparing mayhem again. If local businesses believed polls saying Biden has it in the bag, I doubt they’d be doing this. I suppose you might argue they fear joyful riots because Biden won. I think it more likely the senescent Biden will lose and the businesses here fear a continuation of the left’s bullying and temper tantrums. Indeed, on a stupid pretext (as usual) the riots have already begun here with 14 injured policemen and more damaged businesses, businesses already reeling from the consequences of our blinkered mayor’s lockdowns.
There are many demonstrations planned for the nation’s capital in the coming week.
Here are the plans and the sponsor of one of them: “DC Action Lab/Public Citizen is taking place at Freedom Plaza, Lafayette Park, McPhearson Square, Farragut Square between Nov. 11 through Nov. 23. It’s a free speech demonstration against the election results.” DC Action Lab’s website describes itself as “a worker-owned collective of experienced organizers trying to build a world based on equity, justice, and sustainability.”
Another group, Shutdown DC, also plans huge rallies in the Capital on Election Day. In a stunning example of projection in support of the Democrats, the party that for four years plotted to remove a duly elected president, it describes the motive for its planned disruption:
Shutdown D.C. still expects 10,000 people, as it indicated in its permit. It’s now calling for members of multiple groups to meet at Black Lives Matter Plaza on Election Day with plans to continue the event throughout the week. “We are concerned like many people that (President Donald) Trump may try to steal this election,” said Kaela Bamberger with Shutdown D.C. “He’s given us a lot of evidence to indicate that he has no problem trying to confuse the results or prematurely declare victory. At Shutdown D.C., we’re preparing to be able to mobilize quickly in D.C. if he should attempt to do so.” The group, initially organized in 2019 in response to the call for climate change, and took part in global climate strikes in an effort to shut down traffic and block intersections in D.C. last year. Bamberger said the group intends to make its voices heard if the democratic process is undermined.
Nancy Pelosi surely seems to be planning a coup by street riots. Otherwise how to explain this:
I feel very confident that Joe Biden will be elected president on Tuesday whatever the end count is. But on the election that occurs on Tuesday he will be elected on January 20th. He will be inaugurated president of the United States.
I read these plans and Pelosi’s threat as recognition that, like myself, these people do not believe polls indicating Biden will win.
I know many of us are anxious about the results — even without the pending threat of continuing violence. Along with partisan censorship by the Silicon Valley platforms, the propagandizing in the media has been worse than I can recall.
In the Federalist, Mollie Hemingway lets us count the ways they do it. I urge you to read it all. Here is a brief summary.
They overemphasize polls to express “deep-seated media bias… in the hope that the polls might move public opinion rather than reflect it.” (Mickey Kaus has long referred to such polls and media treatment of them as “hamburger helper polls”).
“They are downplaying Trump’s record of accomplishment and the enthusiasm he has from voters.” (If you are paying attention, thousands of people travel for many miles and stand in long lines to attend his many rallies while actual crowds of attendees at the few Biden or Harris “rallies” are almost nonexistent. )
Hemingway is right that the president’s biggest successes have been in foreign policy. (That’s probably because the White House has the freest hand here — there’s not much a leftist judiciary or Congress can do to interfere with his peace and trade agreements.) She notes how he “eroded ISIS’ territorial gains,” rewrote bad trade deals, reshaped alliances in the Middle East (successfully gelding the corrupt Palestinian Authority and limiting Iran’s options), he’s compelled NATO members to start paying their end of the deal — all of which the media has kept hidden. Just as they’ve buried his successful policies “marked by significant growth of the economy”.
Of course, I could be wrong. People could choose a weak, demented Biden who promises us a cold winter, energy shortages, tax increases, more lockdowns and mask mandates, increased crime and collusion with the Chinese thugs, and who says “America is dead,” instead of a candidate promising a sunny, prosperous future. But I don’t think I am.
Neither, it seems, does Mark Levin, who tweeted:
Will Joe Biden accept the results of the election? Why does he have 600 ambulance-chasing lawyers ready to sue? Why is he being told not to concede? Why is his party suing in battleground states to change election laws and extend voting beyond Election Day? Why didn’t his party accept the 2016 election results? Why did his party impeach the president over nothing? As for a peaceful transition of power, why are his voters rioting? And why do his supporters keep threatening violence if Trump wins? Don’t you hate the fraudulent media in this country?
And then there are the effects of COVID-19, much politicized by the Democrats, the media, Dr. Fauci, the WHO, and the CDC.
If you want to see the mechanics of how the CDC tallies up its statistics, Scott Adams, creator of Dilbert, opens the door on their Dilbert-like operation.
@ScottAdamsSays For a laugh, see how the CDC estimates the number of regular influenza deaths. It’s so absurd they can’t even describe it coherently.
Check it out — It’s mindboggling folderol. If, by chance, you hope to see any meaningful statistical work by the CDC, you will quickly be disabused of that notion when you read this. I’m sticking with honest analysis by better thinkers which reveals that the mortality rate from COVID-19 is not far different than an rigorous tally of mortality by other flus. (CDC admits that many young people have died of suicide and drug overdoses as a result of the lockdowns, and their mortality rate would seem to be higher only because of government action in response to the new flu.)
In July, the director of the CDC confirmed the higher suicide rates connected to the lockdowns — I cannot imagine this trend has diminished as schools remain closed and lockdowns continue in many areas of the country:
Center for Disease Control Director Robert Redfield said in a Buck Institute webinar that suicides and drug overdoses have surpassed the death rate for COVID-19 among high school students. Redfield argued that lockdowns and lack of public schooling constituted a disproportionally negative impact on young peoples’ mental health. “But there has been another cost that we’ve seen, particularly in high schools,” Redfield said. “We’re seeing, sadly, far greater suicides now than we are deaths from COVID. We’re seeing far greater deaths from drug overdose that are above excess that we had as background than we are seeing the deaths from COVID. So this is why I keep coming back for the overall social being of individuals, is let’s all work together and find out how we can find common ground to get these schools open in a way that people are comfortable and their safe.” Roughly 146,000 people have died from COVID or COVID-related causes in the U.S., according to CDC data. The most recent publicized federal data records 48,000 deaths from suicide and at least 1.4 million attempts in 2018. In 2019, almost 71,000 people died from drug overdoses. [snip] Historical trends give reason to believe the suicide rate may rise due to extenuating [sic] circumstances caused by COVID-19, including unemployment and social isolation. For example, in the year after the Great Recession in 2008, the rate in America was 6.4 percent higher than expected. While the rate didn’t’ “skyrocket,” as some have predicted it will this year, the coronavirus pandemic and economic shutdown has dealt a worse blow to the U.S. psyche. Thirty to 40 million jobs have been lost to the economic shutdown, compared to 2.6 million in 2008.
Maybe the Democrats and their media running dogs thought it was brilliant to overplay the threat of COVID in an attempt to destroy the economy and with it the President’s re-election chances. But the economy is fast rebounding in an astonishingly swift recovery — 33.1% growth in GDP for the third quarter of this year, the best GDP growth in history — and it appears they’ve terrified their supporters more than their opponents.
As Don Surber notes:
I offer a few items for thought, beginning with the laugh of the day. Jason Miller tweeted, “Just spoke with a smart Dem strategist who is upset with the media’s suppression campaign against Biden voters. Dems have spent months scaring voters away from in-person voting & are now realizing they need those votes, and media COVID fearmongering isn’t helping matters… “Additionally, these possible Biden voters just aren’t that excited to go stand in line for him, on top of the media-driven COVID in-person voting fears. Massive enthusiasm disadvantage for Biden camp heading into Election Day is a problem — the Red Wave is coming!”
A few weeks ago, I had minor eye surgery and had to go through a COVID test, a temperature reading, hand sanitizing, and masking for a ten-minute procedure. Disgusted with all these theatrics, I asked the doctor how long he thought we’d have to endure this nonsense. He responded “November 4th.”
Be of good cheer.
••••
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-01--How COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Are Rigged

How COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Are Rigged

There ’ s been a lot of talk lately about whether or not the fast-tracked COVID-19 vaccine will in fact be safe and effective .
While vaccine makers insist that any vaccine reaching the market will have undergone rigorous testing , the way trial protocols are designed suggests these vaccines may leave a lot to be desired .
As reported1 by Forbes contributor William Haseltine , a former professor at Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health , while Moderna , Pfizer , AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson have all published their vaccine trial protocols in a rare @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the protocols raises surprising concerns.
” In a nutshell , the trial designs are such that the vaccines will get a passing grade even if their efficacy is minimal .
Of course , we must also consider vaccine side effects and I ’ ve also written several articles about mounting safety concerns .
As noted by Haseltine , prevention of infection would typically be a critical endpoint of any vaccine trial .
In other words , you want to ensure that when you take the vaccine , your risk of infection is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comes to the COVID-19 vaccine , shockingly , preventing infection is not a criterion for success in any of these trials .
The only criterion for a successful COVID-19 vaccine is a reduction of COVID-19 symptoms , and even then , the reduction required is minimal .
To get a “ passing ” grade in the limited interim analysis , a vaccine must show a 70 % efficacy .
However , again , this does not mean it will prevent infection in 7 of 10 people .
As explained by Haseltine:3 The other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ similar protocol , where only a limited number of vaccinated participants are exposed to the virus to evaluate the extent of their symptoms .
Johnson & Johnson ’ s interim analysis will include results from 77 vaccine recipients who have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 , and if fewer than 18 of them develop symptoms of COVID-19 , compared to 59 in the control group , the vaccine will be considered successful .
In AstraZeneca ’ s case , the interim analysis includes 50 vaccine recipients .
The vaccine will be a success if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to SARS-CoV-2 , compared to 19 in the 25-person control group .
Pfizer ’ s interim analysis is the smallest of the bunch , with just 32 vaccine recipients .
Their success margin is seven or fewer vaccine recipients developing symptoms , compared to 25 in the control group .
In the primary analysis , efficacy is set to about 60 % , and at most , 164 volunteers will be included in that analysis .
Especially concerning are that those receiving the vaccine in these trials are young and healthy individuals who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dying from COVID-19 .
This makes the results of these trials highly questionable in the far more vulnerable population of the elderly .
Trials Are Merely Testing Reduction of Common Cold Symptoms As if that ’ s not eyebrow-raising enough , the minimum qualification for a “ case of COVID-19 ” amounts to just one positive PCR test and one or two mild symptoms , such as headache , fever , cough or mild nausea .
As noted by Haseltine , “ This is far from adequate.
” All they ’ re doing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine will minimize common cold symptoms .
They are not actually ensuring the vaccine will prevent serious COVID-19 complications .
Johnson & Johnson ’ s trial is the only one that requires at least five severe COVID-19 cases to be included in the interim analysis .
Severe illness and death are also secondary objectives in these trials , and none of them include failure to prevent hospitalization or death as an important barrier to success .
The increasingly disappearing common sense tells us that if the vaccine can not reduce infection , hospitalization @ @ @ @ @ @ @ end the pandemic , which means everyone who takes the vaccine will be doing so in vain .
Some COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Are Not Using Inert Placebos In addition to all of that , some COVID-19 vaccine trials are using other vaccines as “ placebo ” rather than truly biologically inert substances such as saline , which effectively makes if far easier to hide any vaccine side effects .
While Moderna is using a saline solution placebo,5 AstraZeneca is using injected meningococcal vaccine rather than a true placebo.6 Another way AstraZeneca is masking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine along with certain drugs .
In one of its study arms , subjects are given acetaminophen every six hours for the first 24 hours after inoculation .
The pain and fever reducer could potentially mask and downplay side effects such as pain , fever , headache or general malaise .
In addition to masking side effects , it is widely recognized among literate natural medicine physicians that using acetaminophen during acute viral infections is not a wise strategy as it impairs the immune response to fight the infection .
September 6 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine trial due to a “ suspected serious and unexpected adverse reaction ” in a British participant.8,9 The company did not initially divulge the nature of the adverse reaction , but it has since been revealed the volunteer developed severe inflammation of the spinal cord , known as transverse myelitis.10,11 September 12 , 2020 , the British Medicines Health Regulatory Authority gave AstraZeneca the go-ahead to resume its Phase 3 trial in the U.K. , after an independent review found it “ safe to do so.
” 12,13 According to an AstraZeneca spokesperson @ @ @ @ @ @ @ undiagnosed multiple sclerosis.14 Days later , September 19 , 2020 , The New York Times reported15 a second case of transverse myelitis had occurred in the AstraZeneca trial .
According to one expert consulted by the NYT , the occurrence represented a “ dangerous pattern , ” and that a third incidence might shut down the vaccine trial indefinitely .
AstraZeneca , however , claims the two cases are “ unlikely to be associated with the vaccine , ” and that there ’ s “ insufficient evidence to say for certain that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the vaccine.
” 16 October 21 , 2020 , it was reported17 that one of the volunteers in AstraZeneca ’ s Brazilian trial had died from COVID-19 complications , but that the trial would continue anyway .
October 12 , 2020 , Johnson & Johnson halted its trial due to “ unexplained illness ” in one of its participants.18,19 Like AstraZeneca , Johnson & Johnson has kept mum about the details of the illness , saying “ it ’ s important to have all the facts before we share additional information.
” The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ halted is surprising considering the rate of side effects20 occurring in perfectly healthy volunteers .
As reported in “ Gates Tries to Justify Side Effects of Fast-Tracked Vaccine , ” after the first of two doses of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine , 80 % of Phase 1 participants receiving the 100 microgram ( mcg ) dose developed systemic side effects.21 After the second dose , 100 % reported side effects ranging from fatigue ( 80 % ) , chills ( 80 % ) , headache ( 60 % ) and myalgia or muscle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that , the 100-mcg dose was ultimately chosen to move on to Phase 3 trials.22 In the highest dosage group , which received 250 mcg , 100 % of participants suffered side effects after both the first and second doses.23 Three of the 14 participants ( 21 % ) in the 250-mcg group suffered “ one or more severe events.
” An October 1 , 2020 , report24 by CNBC reviews the experiences of five participants in Moderna ’ s and Pfizer ’ s SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trials .
One of the participants in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up with chills , shaking so hard he cracked a tooth after taking the second dose.
” A Moderna trial participant told CNBC he had a low-grade fever and felt “ under the weather ” for several days after his first shot .
Eight hours after his second shot he was “ bed-bound with a fever of over 101 , shakes , chills , a pounding headache and shortness of breath .
He said the pain in his arm , where he received the shot , felt like a ‘ goose egg on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ night , recording that his temperature was higher than 100 degrees for five hours.
” 25 Two others reported similar side effects , and a third warned you would need to take a day off after the second shot .
CNBC also noted that “ as companies progressed through clinical trials , several vaccine makers abandoned their highest doses following reports of more severe reactions.
” Might Certain COVID-19 Vaccines Raise Risk of AIDS ?
Disturbingly , a group of researchers are now expressing concern that some COVID-19 vaccine candidates might put certain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ HIV , the virus that causes AIDS.26,27,28 Using the failed attempt to create an HIV vaccine as an example , researchers explain29 that the genetically engineered adenovirus , Ad5 , used in the HIV vaccine trials , is the same one being used now in four COVID-19 candidates being studied in the U.S. , Russia and Pakistan .
At the time of the failed HIV vaccine , scientists were unable to identify the exact reason why Ad5 seemed to increase the risk of HIV ; it just inexplicably did .
Interestingly , Dr. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the HIV study,30 in which he questioned “ whether the problem extends to some or all of the other recombinant vectors currently in development or to other vector-based vaccines.
” Reflecting on that question , the researchers say they decided to go public with this information now , because Ad5 vaccines for COVID-19 might soon be tested in populations with high HIV prevalence , and they believe that informed consent about the HIV/AIDS risk should be part of the COVID-19 clinical studies .
According to one September 2020 poll,31 only 51 % of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” would get the COVID-19 vaccine when it comes out .
Another survey32 found only 44 % would take the first-generation vaccine even if they were paid $ 100 .
Mounting vaccine hesitancy was bemoaned in an October 1 , 2020 , article33 in the New England Journal of Medicine , and the answer , the article suggests , is to make it mandatory for all .
And , to entice compliance , the authors recommend implementing severe penalties for noncompliance , such as the suspension of employment and/or house arrest .
An @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by Wisconsin Public Radio also warns that if precedents hold , employers may have the right to force workers to get vaccinated .
Potential exceptions might include certain medical issues , bona fide religious objections , and certain union contracts that bar vaccine requirements .
Operation Warp Speed recently selected Walgreens and CVS as nationwide partners in the coming vaccine distribution effort.35 Nursing homes and long-term care facilities around the U.S. can opt in by signing up to have either of these companies come and administer the vaccine to its residents and staff @ @ @ @ @ @ @ passports ” are also becoming reality .
Ireland , for example , has already begun its national trial .
The Health Passport Ireland initiative uses an app to track and display results of COVID-19 testing .
Vaccination status will be added once a vaccine becomes available .
Untold amounts of money are also being spent on programs to tag , track and trace the human population in the name of public health and safety .
According to an article36 in the journal JAMA , the estimated cumulative costs of the COVID-19 pandemic related @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to more than $ 16 trillion in the U.S. alone , or about 90 % of our annual gross domestic product .
“ For this reason , policies that can materially reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2 have enormous social value , ” the article claims .
However , testing , tracing and isolation rules , all of which are promoted in this article , also have a price , and it ’ s one that any sensible person would reject , namely the loss of privacy and liberty .
As reported37 by The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our freedom in the name of public health .
Do we really want to live in a “ biosecurity state ” ?
These freedom-robbing strategies are being sold to us as the path back to normalcy , but the reality will be anything but normal .
As detailed in “ The Global Takeover Is Underway , ” the pandemic and the global response to it is far from accidental .
Overwhelmingly , the evidence points to it being part of a much larger scheme to implement the last stages of a technocratic takeover @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aspects of this globalists agenda in “ COVID Symptoms of Power : Tech Billionaires Harvest Humanity , ” “ Tech Billionaires Aiming at a Global Currency , ” “ Harvard Professor Exposes Surveillance Capitalism , ” “ How Medical Technocracy Made the Plandemic Possible ” and “ US Surveillance Bill 6666 : The Devil in the Details.
” The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically widened the economic gap between average people and the wealthy elite,38,39 and continuing down the path we ’ re currently on will only make this disparity worse , not better @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about creating a better world for the average person , it ’ s about enslaving us so that we can not reject or even resist what ’ s ultimately coming .
Forced vaccinations are but one aspect of the plan that must be resisted at all cost .

How COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Are Rigged
Analysis by: Dr. Joseph Mercola
There’s been a lot of talk lately about whether or not the fast-tracked COVID-19 vaccine will in fact be safe and effective. While vaccine makers insist that any vaccine reaching the market will have undergone rigorous testing, the way trial protocols are designed suggests these vaccines may leave a lot to be desired.
As reported1 by Forbes contributor William Haseltine, a former professor at Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health, while Moderna, Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson have all published their vaccine trial protocols in a rare display of transparency, “close inspection of the protocols raises surprising concerns.”
In a nutshell, the trial designs are such that the vaccines will get a passing grade even if their efficacy is minimal. Of course, we must also consider vaccine side effects and I’ve also written several articles about mounting safety concerns.
COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Rigged to Pass Efficacy Test
As noted by Haseltine, prevention of infection would typically be a critical endpoint of any vaccine trial. In other words, you want to ensure that when you take the vaccine, your risk of infection is significantly reduced.
However, when it comes to the COVID-19 vaccine, shockingly, preventing infection is not a criterion for success in any of these trials. The only criterion for a successful COVID-19 vaccine is a reduction of COVID-19 symptoms, and even then, the reduction required is minimal.
“We all expect an effective vaccine to prevent serious illness if infected. Three of the vaccine protocols — Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca — do not require that their vaccine prevent serious disease only that they prevent moderate symptoms which may be as mild as cough, or headache,” Haseltine writes,2 adding: “The pharmaceutical companies intend to do trials ranging from 30,000 to 60,000 participants. This scale of study would be sufficient for testing vaccine efficacy. The first surprise found upon a closer reading of the protocols reveals that each study intends to complete interim and primary analyses that at most include 164 participants. These companies likely intend to apply for an emergency use authorization (EUA) from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with just their limited preliminary results.”
To get a “passing” grade in the limited interim analysis, a vaccine must show a 70% efficacy. However, again, this does not mean it will prevent infection in 7 of 10 people. As explained by Haseltine:3
“For Moderna, the initial interim analysis will be based on the results of infection of only 53 people. The judgment reached in interim analysis is dependent upon the difference in the number of people with symptoms … in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated group. Moderna’s success margin is for 13 or less of those 53 to develop symptoms compared to 40 or more in their control group.”
The other vaccine makers are basing results on a similar protocol, where only a limited number of vaccinated participants are exposed to the virus to evaluate the extent of their symptoms.
Johnson & Johnson’s interim analysis will include results from 77 vaccine recipients who have been infected with SARS-CoV-2, and if fewer than 18 of them develop symptoms of COVID-19, compared to 59 in the control group, the vaccine will be considered successful.
In AstraZeneca’s case, the interim analysis includes 50 vaccine recipients. The vaccine will be a success if 12 or fewer develop symptoms after exposure to SARS-CoV-2, compared to 19 in the 25-person control group.
Pfizer’s interim analysis is the smallest of the bunch, with just 32 vaccine recipients. Their success margin is seven or fewer vaccine recipients developing symptoms, compared to 25 in the control group. In the primary analysis, efficacy is set to about 60%, and at most, 164 volunteers will be included in that analysis.
Especially concerning are that those receiving the vaccine in these trials are young and healthy individuals who are not really at high risk of dying from COVID-19. This makes the results of these trials highly questionable in the far more vulnerable population of the elderly.
Trials Are Merely Testing Reduction of Common Cold Symptoms
As if that’s not eyebrow-raising enough, the minimum qualification for a “case of COVID-19” amounts to just one positive PCR test and one or two mild symptoms, such as headache, fever, cough or mild nausea. As noted by Haseltine, “This is far from adequate.”
All they’re doing is testing to see if this COVID-19 vaccine will minimize common cold symptoms. They are not actually ensuring the vaccine will prevent serious COVID-19 complications. Johnson & Johnson’s trial is the only one that requires at least five severe COVID-19 cases to be included in the interim analysis.
“One of the more immediate questions a trial needs to answer is whether a vaccine prevents infection. If someone takes this vaccine, are they far less likely to become infected with the virus? These trials all clearly focus on eliminating symptoms of COVID-19, and not infections themselves. Asymptomatic infection is listed as a secondary objective in these trials when they should be of critical importance. It appears that all the pharmaceutical companies assume that the vaccine will never prevent infection. Their criteria for approval is the difference in symptoms between an infected control group and an infected vaccine group. They do not measure the difference between infection and noninfection as a primary motivation,” Haseltine writes.4
Severe illness and death are also secondary objectives in these trials, and none of them include failure to prevent hospitalization or death as an important barrier to success. The increasingly disappearing common sense tells us that if the vaccine cannot reduce infection, hospitalization or death, then it cannot end the pandemic, which means everyone who takes the vaccine will be doing so in vain.
Some COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Are Not Using Inert Placebos
In addition to all of that, some COVID-19 vaccine trials are using other vaccines as “placebo” rather than truly biologically inert substances such as saline, which effectively makes if far easier to hide any vaccine side effects. While Moderna is using a saline solution placebo,5 AstraZeneca is using injected meningococcal vaccine rather than a true placebo.6
Another way AstraZeneca is masking potential side effects is by administering the vaccine along with certain drugs. In one of its study arms, subjects are given acetaminophen every six hours for the first 24 hours after inoculation. The pain and fever reducer could potentially mask and downplay side effects such as pain, fever, headache or general malaise.
In addition to masking side effects, it is widely recognized among literate natural medicine physicians that using acetaminophen during acute viral infections is not a wise strategy as it impairs the immune response to fight the infection.

As reported by Wired:7
“The press release for … results from the Oxford vaccine trials described an increased frequency of ‘minor side effects’ among participants. A look at the actual paper, though, reveals this to be a marketing spin … Yes, mild reactions were far more common than worse ones. But moderate or severe harms — defined as being bad enough to interfere with daily life or needing medical care — were common too. Around one-third of people vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccine without acetaminophen experienced moderate or severe chills, fatigue, headache, malaise, and/or feverishness. Close to 10 percent had a fever of at least 100.4 degrees, and just over one-fourth developed moderate or severe muscle aches. That’s a lot, in a young and healthy group of people — and the acetaminophen didn’t help much for most of those problems.”
Two Trials Paused Due to Safety Concerns
September 6, 2020, AstraZeneca paused its Phase 3 vaccine trial due to a “suspected serious and unexpected adverse reaction” in a British participant.8,9 The company did not initially divulge the nature of the adverse reaction, but it has since been revealed the volunteer developed severe inflammation of the spinal cord, known as transverse myelitis.10,11
September 12, 2020, the British Medicines Health Regulatory Authority gave AstraZeneca the go-ahead to resume its Phase 3 trial in the U.K., after an independent review found it “safe to do so.”12,13 According to an AstraZeneca spokesperson, the incident was a case of undiagnosed multiple sclerosis.14
Days later, September 19, 2020, The New York Times reported15 a second case of transverse myelitis had occurred in the AstraZeneca trial. According to one expert consulted by the NYT, the occurrence represented a “dangerous pattern,” and that a third incidence might shut down the vaccine trial indefinitely.
AstraZeneca, however, claims the two cases are “unlikely to be associated with the vaccine,” and that there’s “insufficient evidence to say for certain that the illnesses were or were not related to the vaccine.”16 October 21, 2020, it was reported17 that one of the volunteers in AstraZeneca’s Brazilian trial had died from COVID-19 complications, but that the trial would continue anyway.
October 12, 2020, Johnson & Johnson halted its trial due to “unexplained illness” in one of its participants.18,19 Like AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson has kept mum about the details of the illness, saying “it’s important to have all the facts before we share additional information.”
Side Effects Are Commonplace
The fact that more trials have not been halted is surprising considering the rate of side effects20 occurring in perfectly healthy volunteers. As reported in “Gates Tries to Justify Side Effects of Fast-Tracked Vaccine,” after the first of two doses of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, 80% of Phase 1 participants receiving the 100 microgram (mcg) dose developed systemic side effects.21
After the second dose, 100% reported side effects ranging from fatigue (80%), chills (80%), headache (60%) and myalgia or muscle pain (53%).
Despite that, the 100-mcg dose was ultimately chosen to move on to Phase 3 trials.22 In the highest dosage group, which received 250 mcg, 100% of participants suffered side effects after both the first and second doses.23 Three of the 14 participants (21%) in the 250-mcg group suffered “one or more severe events.”
An October 1, 2020, report24 by CNBC reviews the experiences of five participants in Moderna’s and Pfizer’s SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trials. One of the participants in Pfizer’s vaccine trial “woke up with chills, shaking so hard he cracked a tooth after taking the second dose.”
A Moderna trial participant told CNBC he had a low-grade fever and felt “under the weather” for several days after his first shot. Eight hours after his second shot he was “bed-bound with a fever of over 101, shakes, chills, a pounding headache and shortness of breath. He said the pain in his arm, where he received the shot, felt like a ‘goose egg on my shoulder.’ He hardly slept that night, recording that his temperature was higher than 100 degrees for five hours.”25
Two others reported similar side effects, and a third warned you would need to take a day off after the second shot. CNBC also noted that “as companies progressed through clinical trials, several vaccine makers abandoned their highest doses following reports of more severe reactions.”
Might Certain COVID-19 Vaccines Raise Risk of AIDS?
Disturbingly, a group of researchers are now expressing concern that some COVID-19 vaccine candidates might put certain people at a higher risk of acquiring HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.26,27,28
Using the failed attempt to create an HIV vaccine as an example, researchers explain29 that the genetically engineered adenovirus, Ad5, used in the HIV vaccine trials, is the same one being used now in four COVID-19 candidates being studied in the U.S., Russia and Pakistan.
At the time of the failed HIV vaccine, scientists were unable to identify the exact reason why Ad5 seemed to increase the risk of HIV; it just inexplicably did. Interestingly, Dr. Anthony Fauci was the lead author on the HIV study,30 in which he questioned “whether the problem extends to some or all of the other recombinant vectors currently in development or to other vector-based vaccines.”
Reflecting on that question, the researchers say they decided to go public with this information now, because Ad5 vaccines for COVID-19 might soon be tested in populations with high HIV prevalence, and they believe that informed consent about the HIV/AIDS risk should be part of the COVID-19 clinical studies.
Will COVID-19 Vaccine Be Mandatory?
According to one September 2020 poll,31 only 51% of Americans said they “definitely or probably” would get the COVID-19 vaccine when it comes out. Another survey32 found only 44% would take the first-generation vaccine even if they were paid $100. Mounting vaccine hesitancy was bemoaned in an October 1, 2020, article33 in the New England Journal of Medicine, and the answer, the article suggests, is to make it mandatory for all.
And, to entice compliance, the authors recommend implementing severe penalties for noncompliance, such as the suspension of employment and/or house arrest.
An October 19, 2020, article 34 by Wisconsin Public Radio also warns that if precedents hold, employers may have the right to force workers to get vaccinated. Potential exceptions might include certain medical issues, bona fide religious objections, and certain union contracts that bar vaccine requirements.
Operation Warp Speed recently selected Walgreens and CVS as nationwide partners in the coming vaccine distribution effort.35 Nursing homes and long-term care facilities around the U.S. can opt in by signing up to have either of these companies come and administer the vaccine to its residents and staff, once available.
So-called “health passports” are also becoming reality. Ireland, for example, has already begun its national trial. The Health Passport Ireland initiative uses an app to track and display results of COVID-19 testing. Vaccination status will be added once a vaccine becomes available.
Untold amounts of money are also being spent on programs to tag, track and trace the human population in the name of public health and safety. According to an article36 in the journal JAMA, the estimated cumulative costs of the COVID-19 pandemic related to lost output and health reduction amounts to more than $16 trillion in the U.S. alone, or about 90% of our annual gross domestic product.
“For this reason, policies that can materially reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2 have enormous social value,” the article claims. However, testing, tracing and isolation rules, all of which are promoted in this article, also have a price, and it’s one that any sensible person would reject, namely the loss of privacy and liberty.
As reported37 by The Last American Vagabond, governments are selling our freedom in the name of public health. Do we really want to live in a “biosecurity state”? These freedom-robbing strategies are being sold to us as the path back to normalcy, but the reality will be anything but normal.
As detailed in “The Global Takeover Is Underway,” the pandemic and the global response to it is far from accidental. Overwhelmingly, the evidence points to it being part of a much larger scheme to implement the last stages of a technocratic takeover.
I’ve also covered various aspects of this globalists agenda in “COVID Symptoms of Power: Tech Billionaires Harvest Humanity,” “Tech Billionaires Aiming at a Global Currency,” “Harvard Professor Exposes Surveillance Capitalism,” “How Medical Technocracy Made the Plandemic Possible” and “US Surveillance Bill 6666: The Devil in the Details.”
The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically widened the economic gap between average people and the wealthy elite,38,39 and continuing down the path we’re currently on will only make this disparity worse, not better.
The globalist plan isn’t about creating a better world for the average person, it’s about enslaving us so that we cannot reject or even resist what’s ultimately coming. Forced vaccinations are but one aspect of the plan that must be resisted at all cost.