thelibertybeacon--2020-11-14--How Much (Election) Fraud Could There Be … ???

How Much Fraud Could There Be ?
Many have dismissed election fraud based on claims that there is no fraud , that the amount is small and incapable of changing results , and that the amount required to change results would necessitate an easily discovered coordinated effort .
Three months ago , these same people claimed that President Trump would steal the election through fraud .
They produced nothing to back their assertions , but they could have made estimates to show the minimal capacity for fraud .
How much fraud could there be , and can it be corrected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election officials are in on the fraud , as the news about Dominion and the exposed shenanigans imply , it could be so extreme that 90 of 100 people vote for Trump and 100 votes are certified for Biden .
There would be 90 angry people saying , “ I voted for Trump , ” but fraud committed by election officials is almost impossible to correct .
The FBI has election crimes branches in all of its offices , but as Richard Pilger lamented , had a 40-year-old policy of investigating fraud after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ changed that policy , but probably too little too late .
Corrupt elections are eventually audited , forensically investigated , and proven , and people go to jail .
I have heard dozens of retired Chicago employees brag about their role in frauding Kennedy into the presidency .
The subsequent indictment of 677 officials adds credibility to their claims .
Chicago saw 100,000 fraudulent votes fabricated in the 1982 Illinois elections , thanks again to corrupt election officials who went to jail .
Philadelphia , presently at the center of attention , also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Dominion ’ s systems could turn even honest election officials into unknowing fraudsters .
What kind of election software offers the ability to algorithmically alter votes as a feature ?
It is a part of the auditing and testing system , but could easily be abused or misused .
And the Adjudication Module lets a “ team ” decide the voter ’ s intent .
We ’ re still at hanging chads ?
What kind of election equipment company is named Dominion ?
But what if the election officials were honest and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to pass casual muster following proper procedure ?
Walk sheets direct campaign workers to the homes of strong party supporters and regular voters , and contain the names , ages , phone numbers , addresses , party affiliations and voting histories of every registered voter .
This information is publicly accessible , available for purchase or obtained through campaigns .
Impersonation is one easy way to fraud .
I have heard a few stories from election judges who encountered impersonators .
Estimating a half hour to travel to a different polling place and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ votes on election day , with no need for fake ID .
Under the rules of many states , the fraudster walks in , proclaims their assumed name , scribbles and votes .
On the rare occasion that the signature is challenged , the fraudster bails .
Hitting 10 early voting locations every day , one fraudster might add another 300 to 400 undetectable votes .
Every year about 10 % of people move , and about 16 % of those move to another state , so playing the averages , about 3.2 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have moved away and are likely still registered , and it accumulates , and it shows in the walk sheets .
The fraudsters cross-reference the voting history lists and moving lists .
There are plenty of stale voters , enough that over 3 % of the vote could be fraudulent through impersonation at the polling place .
A crew of 10 fraudsters could cast 4,000 ballots in a single county .
Three counties of 10-person crews impersonating voters , and Biden wins Georgia and Wisconsin .
Apart from fraud , impersonation also exposes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Voters can take the fraud into their own hands by casting mail-in or absentee ballots where they have previously lived .
Forensic audits reveal low amounts of it , maybe 1 in 4,000 votes , a few thousand across a large state .
Double-voting depends strongly on the ethics and motivations of the fraudster , tempered by fear of prosecution after being caught in routine audits .
With Trump , motivation was likely strong .
The most vulnerable part of our election system is the mailed ballot .
The signed outer envelope @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ballot inside , and there is no security to protect the envelope in its voyage .
There are many ways to commit fraud with mailed ballots .
Imagine a fraudster calling ahead with a message like , “ Hi , this is Mike with the Lehigh County Republicans .
Don ’ t trust the Post Office with your ballot .
This Wednesday , we will be in your neighborhood between 1 and 3 to collect ballots and make sure they are counted.
” Ever the dutiful Republican , your 80-year-old mother fills out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her door , just as promised .
Working with a driver , three minutes per stop , up to 20 or more ballots per hour , 160 per day , up to 6400 strong Republican ballots disposed of throughout the mail voting period .
A crew of amateurs did 900 in a week .
But instead of disposing of those Republican ballots , the envelopes can be steamed open and the ballots replaced with Democrat ballots .
Steaming and stuffing an envelope might take about five minutes , so add one more person @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , 4000 flipped during mail voting .
A three-person crew eliminates 6400 Trump ballots and gives Biden 4000 , a 10,400 ballot swing .
If the driver and collector put in some extra hours to steam ballots , all 6400 could be flipped to yield a 12,800 ballot swing , with just three people and a robocall .
Apart from punishing corruption months or years later , when against corrupt officials there appears little to do .
Despite apparently losing the election , was Kennedy removed from office and Nixon sworn in ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the courts must act uncharacteristically aggressively toward election fraud , ordering forensic inspections and audits at even the appearance of fraud .
Impersonation and double-voting can be detected through auditing , but those ballots are mixed in the box , identical to the others .
Some states may have ways to filter them , assuming they are discovered before certification .
Intercepted ballots are gone .
Ten people vanish 50,000 Trump votes .
Biden wins .
Get over it .
Even if people report , “ these guys pretended to be Republicans and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no replacement ballot .
Flipped ballots are likely unofficial copies and might be forensically detected , if a court orders it .
If Trump is only 40,000 votes down and there are 200,000 fake Biden ballots ( from a crew of 48 people ) , catching a fifth of those would change the result .
Hopefully , where the election officials stayed open late behind closed doors to receive fake ballots , the courts will order a forensic inspection prior to certification .
The Democrat and media assertions are bunk .
Fraud occurs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ involves conspiracies that are discovered .
In 2020 , there are dozens of potentially corrupt jurisdictions that have acted suspiciously , and dozens of other unconfirmed allegations , and any one of them could significantly change the result .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

How Much Fraud Could There Be?
By: Anthony J. Ciani
Many have dismissed election fraud based on claims that there is no fraud, that the amount is small and incapable of changing results, and that the amount required to change results would necessitate an easily discovered coordinated effort. Three months ago, these same people claimed that President Trump would steal the election through fraud. They produced nothing to back their assertions, but they could have made estimates to show the minimal capacity for fraud. How much fraud could there be, and can it be corrected before the vote is certified?
If election officials are in on the fraud, as the news about Dominion and the exposed shenanigans imply, it could be so extreme that 90 of 100 people vote for Trump and 100 votes are certified for Biden. There would be 90 angry people saying, “I voted for Trump,” but fraud committed by election officials is almost impossible to correct. The FBI has election crimes branches in all of its offices, but as Richard Pilger lamented, had a 40-year-old policy of investigating fraud after certification. Attorney General William Barr recently changed that policy, but probably too little too late.
Corrupt elections are eventually audited, forensically investigated, and proven, and people go to jail. I have heard dozens of retired Chicago employees brag about their role in frauding Kennedy into the presidency. The subsequent indictment of 677 officials adds credibility to their claims. Chicago saw 100,000 fraudulent votes fabricated in the 1982 Illinois elections, thanks again to corrupt election officials who went to jail. Philadelphia, presently at the center of attention, also has its share of corrupt election officials.
Dominion’s systems could turn even honest election officials into unknowing fraudsters. What kind of election software offers the ability to algorithmically alter votes as a feature? It is a part of the auditing and testing system, but could easily be abused or misused. And the Adjudication Module lets a “team” decide the voter’s intent. We’re still at hanging chads? What kind of election equipment company is named Dominion?
But what if the election officials were honest and Dominion free, and the fraud had to pass casual muster following proper procedure?
Impersonation
Walk sheets direct campaign workers to the homes of strong party supporters and regular voters, and contain the names, ages, phone numbers, addresses, party affiliations and voting histories of every registered voter. This information is publicly accessible, available for purchase or obtained through campaigns.
Impersonation is one easy way to fraud. I have heard a few stories from election judges who encountered impersonators. Estimating a half hour to travel to a different polling place and vote, a fraudster could cast 24 votes on election day, with no need for fake ID. Under the rules of many states, the fraudster walks in, proclaims their assumed name, scribbles and votes. On the rare occasion that the signature is challenged, the fraudster bails. Hitting 10 early voting locations every day, one fraudster might add another 300 to 400 undetectable votes.
Every year about 10% of people move, and about 16% of those move to another state, so playing the averages, about 3.2% of last elections’ voters will have moved away and are likely still registered, and it accumulates, and it shows in the walk sheets. The fraudsters cross-reference the voting history lists and moving lists. There are plenty of stale voters, enough that over 3% of the vote could be fraudulent through impersonation at the polling place. A crew of 10 fraudsters could cast 4,000 ballots in a single county.
Three counties of 10-person crews impersonating voters, and Biden wins Georgia and Wisconsin. Apart from fraud, impersonation also exposes innocent people to potential prosecution for double-voting.
Double-voting
Voters can take the fraud into their own hands by casting mail-in or absentee ballots where they have previously lived. Forensic audits reveal low amounts of it, maybe 1 in 4,000 votes, a few thousand across a large state. Double-voting depends strongly on the ethics and motivations of the fraudster, tempered by fear of prosecution after being caught in routine audits. With Trump, motivation was likely strong.
Mail fraud — Interception
The most vulnerable part of our election system is the mailed ballot. The signed outer envelope has almost no security to protect the ballot inside, and there is no security to protect the envelope in its voyage. There are many ways to commit fraud with mailed ballots. Imagine a fraudster calling ahead with a message like, “Hi, this is Mike with the Lehigh County Republicans. Don’t trust the Post Office with your ballot. This Wednesday, we will be in your neighborhood between 1 and 3 to collect ballots and make sure they are counted.” Ever the dutiful Republican, your 80-year-old mother fills out her ballot and Mike shows up at her door, just as promised. Working with a driver, three minutes per stop, up to 20 or more ballots per hour, 160 per day, up to 6400 strong Republican ballots disposed of throughout the mail voting period. A crew of amateurs did 900 in a week.
Mail fraud — Flipping
But instead of disposing of those Republican ballots, the envelopes can be steamed open and the ballots replaced with Democrat ballots. Steaming and stuffing an envelope might take about five minutes, so add one more person and 100 ballots are flipped per day, 4000 flipped during mail voting. A three-person crew eliminates 6400 Trump ballots and gives Biden 4000, a 10,400 ballot swing. If the driver and collector put in some extra hours to steam ballots, all 6400 could be flipped to yield a 12,800 ballot swing, with just three people and a robocall.
Restoring the election
Apart from punishing corruption months or years later, when against corrupt officials there appears little to do. Despite apparently losing the election, was Kennedy removed from office and Nixon sworn in? There is hope for Trump, but the courts must act uncharacteristically aggressively toward election fraud, ordering forensic inspections and audits at even the appearance of fraud.
Impersonation and double-voting can be detected through auditing, but those ballots are mixed in the box, identical to the others. Some states may have ways to filter them, assuming they are discovered before certification.
Intercepted ballots are gone. Ten people vanish 50,000 Trump votes. Biden wins. Get over it. Even if people report, “these guys pretended to be Republicans and took my ballot,” there is no replacement ballot. Flipped ballots are likely unofficial copies and might be forensically detected, if a court orders it. If Trump is only 40,000 votes down and there are 200,000 fake Biden ballots (from a crew of 48 people), catching a fifth of those would change the result. Hopefully, where the election officials stayed open late behind closed doors to receive fake ballots, the courts will order a forensic inspection prior to certification.
The Democrat and media assertions are bunk. Fraud occurs on scales that easily change outcomes and involves conspiracies that are discovered. In 2020, there are dozens of potentially corrupt jurisdictions that have acted suspiciously, and dozens of other unconfirmed allegations, and any one of them could significantly change the result.
••••
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-15--Your Child Could be Tested & Detained for COVID Without Your Consent

Your Child Could be Tested & Detained for COVID Without Your Consent In a recent article published by the website Lockdown Sceptics , author Will Jones criticized the current testing of COVID-19 in Liverpool .
He outlined a letter that was sent to parents of children attending the Broadgreen International School in Liverpool , which he believed was extremely worrying , The letter , written by headteacher Ms P. Towley and published on the Lockdown Sceptics website , did indeed , as suggested , have sinister undertones .
This is extremely worrying , as not only is this UK school @ @ @ @ @ @ @ without their parents ’ permission , but they are also going to identify each child with a unique barcode .
All of this information leads The Liberty Beacon to question not only this schools ethics but the validity of these barcodes and how they are going to be distributed .
They may be , of course , be attached to the child ’ s paperwork , in which case , apart from the ethics of whether any child should be listed as merely a number , no real harm has been done .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ that these barcodes could be tattooed either permanently or temporarily onto the child ’ s arm , in the same way as the numbers were permanently tattooed on the arms of the Jews in 1941 .
If this scenario is the case , then this is a whole new ball game .
[ 2 ] Of course , it is highly unlikely that children will be permanently tattooed with barcodes , however , the whole scenario of using barcodes to identify a child is very concerning .
However , whichever way the authorities @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the children who have COVID–19 , it is still a well-known fact that segregating children into separate groups is a form of discrimination and has the potential to lead to mental illness and bullying .
Segregating the Population into Groups has Being Going on for Years It appears that over the years , segregating the population into groups is something that governments from around the world have been very keen to do .
One of latest schemes that is currently being used in the UK is the yellow sunflower scheme , a scheme @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not a person has a disability and is therefore exempt from wearing a face mask .
However , many disabled people have reported that they hate wearing the yellow sunflower lanyards because they believe that they are similar to the yellow Stars of David that were once used in Nazi Germany to identify Jewish citizens .
I spoke to one disabled person who told me that : After hearing what she had to say , I immediately thought back to the yellow stars that the Jewish community had to wear as a means @ @ @ @ @ @ @ War ll , as these , too , were often described as a mark of shame .
According to a British Library publication , Jews throughout Nazi-occupied Europe were forced to wear a badge in the form of a Yellow Star , as a means of identification .
However , it was the author ’ s final sentence that made me liken both the barcodes and the yellow sunflower lanyards to the yellow star system used in Nazi Germany .
The author concluded that : Isn ’ t it about time that we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sunflower lanyards that are currently being used in the UK to identify the sick and the disabled are not part of the same concept ?
The Jewish Perspective and the Badge of Shame • None Operation Moonshine : New Rapid Test Misses More Than Half of Infection The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Your Child Could be Tested & Detained for COVID Without Your Consent
By TLB Contributing Partner: Christina England, BA, Hons
In a recent article published by the website Lockdown Sceptics, author Will Jones criticized the current testing of COVID-19 in Liverpool. He outlined a letter that was sent to parents of children attending the Broadgreen International School in Liverpool, which he believed was extremely worrying,
He wrote that:
“The headteacher of the Broadgreen International School, a technology college in Liverpool, sent a very sinister letter to parents yesterday, informing them how “privileged” they should feel that the army will be in the school on Monday testing all the children, marking them with a barcode and detaining those who test positive. The head adds that parental permission won’t be sought because “under these very challenging and unprecedented circumstances that is not possible.” Surely, this isn’t legal?” (own emphasis)
••••
••••
The letter, written by headteacher Ms P. Towley and published on the Lockdown Sceptics website, did indeed, as suggested, have sinister undertones.
Towley wrote the following:
“I am pleased to inform you that we at Broadgreen International School are in the privileged position of being one of the first schools within the city to have the testing brought to our site.”
She continued that:
“I have met this afternoon with representatives of the British Army who will be in school next week to Covid -19 to test all our children and staff. Each child and adult will be will be identified with a unique barcode to ensure personal identification of test and subsequent results.” (own emphasis)
She concluded that:
“Under normal circumstances parental permission is sought for the testing of children, however, under these very challenging and unprecedented circumstances that is not possible, therefore would ask that if you wish to exclude your child from this test please do so in writing to me by first thing on Monday morning.” [1]
This is extremely worrying, as not only is this UK school willing to test all of their pupils without their parents’ permission, but they are also going to identify each child with a unique barcode.
All of this information leads The Liberty Beacon to question not only this schools ethics but the validity of these barcodes and how they are going to be distributed.
They may be, of course, be attached to the child’s paperwork, in which case, apart from the ethics of whether any child should be listed as merely a number, no real harm has been done.
However, there is the worrying possibility that these barcodes could be tattooed either permanently or temporarily onto the child’s arm, in the same way as the numbers were permanently tattooed on the arms of the Jews in 1941. If this scenario is the case, then this is a whole new ball game. [2]
Of course, it is highly unlikely that children will be permanently tattooed with barcodes, however, the whole scenario of using barcodes to identify a child is very concerning.
However, whichever way the authorities decide to use these barcodes to identify the children who have COVID–19, it is still a well-known fact that segregating children into separate groups is a form of discrimination and has the potential to lead to mental illness and bullying.
Segregating the Population into Groups has Being Going on for Years
It appears that over the years, segregating the population into groups is something that governments from around the world have been very keen to do.
One of latest schemes that is currently being used in the UK is the yellow sunflower scheme, a scheme put in place to identify whether or not a person has a disability and is therefore exempt from wearing a face mask.
However, many disabled people have reported that they hate wearing the yellow sunflower lanyards because they believe that they are similar to the yellow Stars of David that were once used in Nazi Germany to identify Jewish citizens.
Yellow Sunflower a Mark of Shame
I spoke to one disabled person who told me that:
“I find that by wearing my yellow sunflower lanyard, I am telling the world that I am different, that I am disabled. Personally I find it degrading and humiliating.”
She continued:
“In my opinion they are little more than a mark of shame.”
After hearing what she had to say, I immediately thought back to the yellow stars that the Jewish community had to wear as a means of identification in Nazi Germany during World War ll, as these, too, were often described as a mark of shame.
According to a British Library publication, Jews throughout Nazi-occupied Europe were forced to wear a badge in the form of a Yellow Star, as a means of identification.
The publication stated that:
“This was not a new idea; since medieval times many other societies had forced their Jewish citizens to wear badges to identify themselves.”
They continued that:
“The badges were often printed on coarse yellow cloth and were a garish yellow colour. The star, which represented the Star of David, was outlined in thick, black lines and the word ‘Jew’ was printed in mock-Hebraic type. In the Warsaw ghetto, Jews wore a white armband with a blue Star of David on their left arm. In some ghettos, even babies in prams had to wear the armbands or stars. Jewish shops were also marked with a Yellow Star.”
However, it was the author’s final sentence that made me liken both the barcodes and the yellow sunflower lanyards to the yellow star system used in Nazi Germany. The author concluded that:
“The star was intended to humiliate Jews and to mark them out for segregation and discrimination. The policy also made it easier to identify Jews for deportation to camps.” [3]
Isn’t it about time that we questioned whether or not the barcodes and sunflower lanyards that are currently being used in the UK to identify the sick and the disabled are not part of the same concept?
The Jewish Perspective and the Badge of Shame
References
••••
Note from Christina:
Please visit my new facebook page Arlos New Beginning, where you can follow my little foster dog Arlo’s, journey to his new life. Arlo is a little dog that I am fostering. He is under a year old and completely unable to walk, due to severe birth deformities. I am fostering him from Hessa’s Homeless Hounds in Hertfordshire. We need to raise around £12.000 ($15.900) to enable him to have the surgery that he so desperately needs, to free him from pain and get him on his feet for the first time in his life. If you enjoy reading my articles/work then please consider donating through my fundraiser, where you can read his full story. Or through my PayPal [email protected] Thank you.
••••
About the Author: Christina England, BA Hons, Research Journalist and Author Christina was born and educated in London, U.K. She left school to work in a children’s library, specialising in storytelling and book buying. In 1978, Christina changed her career path to dedicate her time to caring for the elderly and was awarded the title of Care Giver of the Year for her work with the elderly in 1980. After taking an A Level in Psychology and a BTEC in Learning Support, Ms. England spent many years researching vaccines and adverse reactions. She gained a Higher National Diploma in Journalism and Media Studies in 2010 and in 2016 she gained a BA Hons degree in Literature and Humanities. She currently writes for VacTruth, Health Impact News, GreenMedInfo, The Liberty Beacon, Vaccine Impact and Medical Kidnap on immunisation safety and efficacy. She has co-authored the book – Shaken Baby Syndrome or Vaccine Induced Encephalitis – Are Parents Being Falsely Accused? with Dr. Harold Buttram and Vaccination Policy and the UK Government: The Untold Truth with Lucija Tomljenovic PhD, which are sold on Amazon. She also compiled the book Shattered Dreams: The HPV Vaccine Exposed Her website is Parents and Carers Against Medical Injustice
••••
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-15--Cuomo’s Power Grab: New York Suspends Jury Trials – Faults COVID

Cuomo ’ s Power Grab : New York Suspends Jury Trials ‘ Due to Surge in COVID Cases ’ Earlier this week , we revealed how the state of New York is leading the way for reimposing draconian lockdowns on its citizens , supposedly protect residents from the coronavirus .
The state ’ s Democrat governor Andrew Cuomo went on to made a disturbing statement , ringing of classic fascism : Under the cover of a COVID crisis , Cuomo ’ s rule in New York has become increasingly authoritarian , further punctuated this week with the announcement by a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and grand juries will be shutdown , ‘ due to a surge in COVID cases.
’ Another vague decree , and with no real specifics given as to the scientific provenance of the claims that a ‘ pandemic ’ is in fact raging through the state .
It is believed that state officials are relying solely on non-diagnostic PCR tests to falsely claim that more residents have active COVID-19 infections than actually do .
ALBANY — New York ’ s chief administrative judge , Lawrence K. Marks , on Friday issued an order @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state as COVID-19 has surged in many communities .
The notification by Marks , which was sent to judges in an email and goes into effect next week , will also suspend new grand juries from impaneling .
But trials that are underway , and grand juries already impaneled , may continue , Marks said .
The court shutdown comes a week after criminal jury trials had resumed in New York City .
One of those trials was adjourned when several employees at a Bronx courthouse tested positive for COVID-19 .
There are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ jails awaiting trial , according to criminal defense attorneys .
Marks and New York ’ s chief judge , Janet DiFiore , had previously shut down the state ’ s court system on March 13 as COVID-19 cases began exploding .
The exceptions during the prior shutdown were civil jury trials in which attorneys had already delivered opening statements and certain criminal trials .
In conjunction with the earlier court shutdown , Gov .
Andrew M. Cuomo signed an order suspending many of the speedy trial provisions that require , for instance , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unless they are indicted within 45 days .
Many criminal matters , including arraignments and pre-trial detention hearings , have been conducted using online video platforms .
( TLB ) published this article from 21WIRE with our sincere gratitude for the coverage .
YOU CAN SUPPORT 21WIRE ’ S WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @ 21WIRE.TV Related articles about Gov .
Cuomo from The Liberty Beacon : NY Gov .
Cuomo Reaped $ 6.2 Million In Campaign Cash From 347 State Vendors Trump fires back at NY Gov .
Cuomo – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s Cuomo Ripped as a Villain by MSMedia The Guardian The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Cuomo’s Power Grab: New York Suspends Jury Trials ‘Due to Surge in COVID Cases’
Earlier this week, we revealed how the state of New York is leading the way for reimposing draconian lockdowns on its citizens, supposedly protect residents from the coronavirus. The state’s Democrat governor Andrew Cuomo went on to made a disturbing statement, ringing of classic fascism:
“There are only two fundamental truths in this situation: it’s individual discipline and it’s government enforcement. Period. End of sentence.”
Under the cover of a COVID crisis, Cuomo’s rule in New York has become increasingly authoritarian, further punctuated this week with the announcement by a chief administrative judge that all jury trials and grand juries will be shutdown, ‘due to a surge in COVID cases.’
Another vague decree, and with no real specifics given as to the scientific provenance of the claims that a ‘pandemic’ is in fact raging through the state. It is believed that state officials are relying solely on non-diagnostic PCR tests to falsely claim that more residents have active COVID-19 infections than actually do.
Brendon J. Lyons from Times Union reports…
ALBANY — New York’s chief administrative judge, Lawrence K. Marks, on Friday issued an order suspending any new jury trials across the state as COVID-19 has surged in many communities.
The notification by Marks, which was sent to judges in an email and goes into effect next week, will also suspend new grand juries from impaneling.
But trials that are underway, and grand juries already impaneled, may continue, Marks said.
The court shutdown comes a week after criminal jury trials had resumed in New York City. One of those trials was adjourned when several employees at a Bronx courthouse tested positive for COVID-19.
There are an untold number of people sitting in jails awaiting trial, according to criminal defense attorneys.
Marks and New York’s chief judge, Janet DiFiore, had previously shut down the state’s court system on March 13 as COVID-19 cases began exploding.
The exceptions during the prior shutdown were civil jury trials in which attorneys had already delivered opening statements and certain criminal trials.
In conjunction with the earlier court shutdown, Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo signed an order suspending many of the speedy trial provisions that require, for instance, a defendant in custody to be released unless they are indicted within 45 days.
Many criminal matters, including arraignments and pre-trial detention hearings, have been conducted using online video platforms.
READ MORE COVID NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire COVID-19 Files
*********
(TLB) published this article from 21WIRE with our sincere gratitude for the coverage.
Some emphasis added by (TLB)
YOU CAN SUPPORT 21WIRE’S WORK BY SUBSCRIBING & BECOMING A MEMBER @21WIRE.TV
Related articles about Gov. Cuomo from The Liberty Beacon:
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-15--Covid-19: Politicisation, “Corruption” and Suppression of Science – BMJ Editor

When good science is suppressed by the medical-political complex , people die Politicians and governments are suppressing science .
They do so in the public interest , they say , to accelerate availability of diagnostics and treatments .
They do so to support innovation , to bring products to market at unprecedented speed .
Both of these reasons are partly plausible ; the greatest deceptions are founded in a grain of truth .
But the underlying behaviour is troubling .
Science is being suppressed for political and financial gain .
Covid-19 has unleashed state corruption on a grand scale , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Politicians and industry are responsible for this opportunistic embezzlement .
So too are scientists and health experts .
The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency—a time when it is even more important to safeguard science .
The UK ’ s pandemic response provides at least four examples of suppression of science or scientists .
First , the membership , research , and deliberations of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies ( SAGE ) were initially secret until a press leak forced transparency.2 The leak revealed inappropriate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ while exposing under-representation from public health , clinical care , women , and ethnic minorities .
Indeed , the government was also recently ordered to release a 2016 report on deficiencies in pandemic preparedness , Operation Cygnus , following a verdict from the Information Commissioner ’ s Office.34 Next , a Public Health England report on covid-19 and inequalities .
The report ’ s publication was delayed by England ’ s Department of Health ; a section on ethnic minorities was initially withheld and then , following a public outcry , was published @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from Public Health England were instructed not to talk to the media .
Third , on 15 October , the editor of the Lancet complained that an author of a research paper , a UK government scientist , was blocked by the government from speaking to media because of a “ difficult political landscape.
” 7 Now , a new example concerns the controversy over point-of-care antibody testing for covid-19.8 The prime minister ’ s Operation Moonshot depends on immediate and wide availability of accurate rapid diagnostic tests.9 It also depends on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Liverpool with a suboptimal PCR test.1011 The incident relates to research published this week by The BMJ , which finds that the government procured an antibody test that in real world tests falls well short of performance claims made by its manufacturers.1213 Researchers from Public Health England and collaborating institutions sensibly pushed to publish their study findings before the government committed to buying a million of these tests but were blocked by the health department and the prime minister ’ s office.14 Why was it important to procure this product without due @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a preprint server or a government website is compatible with The BMJ ’ s publication policy .
As if to prove a point , Public Health England then unsuccessfully attempted to block The BMJ ’ s press release about the research paper .
Politicians often claim to follow the science , but that is a misleading oversimplification .
Science is rarely absolute .
It rarely applies to every setting or every population .
It doesn ’ t make sense to slavishly follow science or evidence .
A better approach is for politicians , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be informed and guided by science when they decide policy for their public .
But even that approach retains public and professional trust only if science is available for scrutiny and free of political interference , and if the system is transparent and not compromised by conflicts of interest .
Suppression of science and scientists is not new or a peculiarly British phenomenon .
In the US , President Trump ’ s government manipulated the Food and Drug Administration to hastily approve unproved drugs such as hydroxychloroquine and remdesivir.15 Globally , people , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by political and commercial agendas.16 The UK ’ s pandemic response relies too heavily on scientists and other government appointees with worrying competing interests , including shareholdings in companies that manufacture covid-19 diagnostic tests , treatments , and vaccines.17 Government appointees are able to ignore or cherry pick science—another form of misuse—and indulge in anti-competitive practices that favour their own products and those of friends and associates.18 How might science be safeguarded in these exceptional times ?
The first step is full disclosure of competing interests from government , politicians , scientific advisers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ heads of test and trace , diagnostic test procurement , and vaccine delivery .
The next step is full transparency about decision making systems , processes , and knowing who is accountable for what .
Once transparency and accountability are established as norms , individuals employed by government should ideally only work in areas unrelated to their competing interests .
Expertise is possible without competing interests .
If such a strict rule becomes impractical , minimum good practice is that people with competing interests must not be involved in decisions on products and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interest .
Governments and industry must also stop announcing critical science policy by press release .
Such ill judged moves leave science , the media , and stock markets vulnerable to manipulation…

Kamran Abbasi , executive editor Author affiliations
When good science is suppressed by the medical-political complex, people die
Politicians and governments are suppressing science. They do so in the public interest, they say, to accelerate availability of diagnostics and treatments. They do so to support innovation, to bring products to market at unprecedented speed. Both of these reasons are partly plausible; the greatest deceptions are founded in a grain of truth. But the underlying behaviour is troubling.
Science is being suppressed for political and financial gain. Covid-19 has unleashed state corruption on a grand scale, and it is harmful to public health.1 Politicians and industry are responsible for this opportunistic embezzlement. So too are scientists and health experts. The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency—a time when it is even more important to safeguard science.
The UK’s pandemic response provides at least four examples of suppression of science or scientists. First, the membership, research, and deliberations of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) were initially secret until a press leak forced transparency.2 The leak revealed inappropriate involvement of government advisers in SAGE, while exposing under-representation from public health, clinical care, women, and ethnic minorities. Indeed, the government was also recently ordered to release a 2016 report on deficiencies in pandemic preparedness, Operation Cygnus, following a verdict from the Information Commissioner’s Office.34
Next, a Public Health England report on covid-19 and inequalities. The report’s publication was delayed by England’s Department of Health; a section on ethnic minorities was initially withheld and then, following a public outcry, was published as part of a follow-up report.56 Authors from Public Health England were instructed not to talk to the media. Third, on 15 October, the editor of the Lancet complained that an author of a research paper, a UK government scientist, was blocked by the government from speaking to media because of a “difficult political landscape.”7
Now, a new example concerns the controversy over point-of-care antibody testing for covid-19.8 The prime minister’s Operation Moonshot depends on immediate and wide availability of accurate rapid diagnostic tests.9 It also depends on the questionable logic of mass screening—currently being trialled in Liverpool with a suboptimal PCR test.1011
The incident relates to research published this week by The BMJ, which finds that the government procured an antibody test that in real world tests falls well short of performance claims made by its manufacturers.1213 Researchers from Public Health England and collaborating institutions sensibly pushed to publish their study findings before the government committed to buying a million of these tests but were blocked by the health department and the prime minister’s office.14 Why was it important to procure this product without due scrutiny? Prior publication of research on a preprint server or a government website is compatible with The BMJ’s publication policy. As if to prove a point, Public Health England then unsuccessfully attempted to block The BMJ’s press release about the research paper.
Politicians often claim to follow the science, but that is a misleading oversimplification. Science is rarely absolute. It rarely applies to every setting or every population. It doesn’t make sense to slavishly follow science or evidence. A better approach is for politicians, the publicly appointed decision makers, to be informed and guided by science when they decide policy for their public. But even that approach retains public and professional trust only if science is available for scrutiny and free of political interference, and if the system is transparent and not compromised by conflicts of interest.
Suppression of science and scientists is not new or a peculiarly British phenomenon. In the US, President Trump’s government manipulated the Food and Drug Administration to hastily approve unproved drugs such as hydroxychloroquine and remdesivir.15 Globally, people, policies, and procurement are being corrupted by political and commercial agendas.16
The UK’s pandemic response relies too heavily on scientists and other government appointees with worrying competing interests, including shareholdings in companies that manufacture covid-19 diagnostic tests, treatments, and vaccines.17 Government appointees are able to ignore or cherry pick science—another form of misuse—and indulge in anti-competitive practices that favour their own products and those of friends and associates.18
How might science be safeguarded in these exceptional times? The first step is full disclosure of competing interests from government, politicians, scientific advisers, and appointees, such as the heads of test and trace, diagnostic test procurement, and vaccine delivery. The next step is full transparency about decision making systems, processes, and knowing who is accountable for what.
Once transparency and accountability are established as norms, individuals employed by government should ideally only work in areas unrelated to their competing interests. Expertise is possible without competing interests. If such a strict rule becomes impractical, minimum good practice is that people with competing interests must not be involved in decisions on products and policies in which they have a financial interest.
Governments and industry must also stop announcing critical science policy by press release. Such ill judged moves leave science, the media, and stock markets vulnerable to manipulation…


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-15--More nonsense from HMG

More nonsense from HMG

We are witnessing a government slip deeper and deeper into a sesspit of treacherous skulduggery of its own making .
It is probably what happens when you combine quite evil with quite dim.
< Now we don ’ t just have a dodgy , untested and possibly booby-trapped vaccine being recklessly rushed through to “ protect everyone ” from a virus less dangerous than flu and only a serious threat if you are very old or frail due to some other serious threat .
We also have a new nonsensical craziness to add to the government ’ s seriously psychotic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being touted by some treasonous MPs that you won ’ t be able to work in the workplace unless you are vaccinated .
WHY ?
I hear you ask .
What possible danger could an unvaccinated person be to a vaccinated person ?
Stretch your imagination a bit and consider an unvacinated person who goes to work in an office of , say , fifty people .
Of those fifty , let us imagine that half have been good little boys and girls and gotten themselves vaccinated for some reason .
The other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and take their chances with COVID19 which , let ’ s face it , is not very dangerous for the vast majority of us .
Now imagine an unvaccinated person turns up at work one day and he is infectious with COVID19 .
Whom does he place in danger ?
Well , not the vaccinated people IF the vaccine ( a big “ IF ” admittedly ) lives up to the hype with which the government has promoted its “ let ’ s inject everybody with this untested experimental concoction ” drive .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ are in no danger from the unvaccinated .
They may well be in danger from any side effects of the vaccine the government has omitted to tell anyone about in its rush to get mass vaccination going .
But they are not in any danger from the unvaccinated .
So who is in danger from the unvaccinated ?
.
Why , the other unvaccinated people of course !
These are the people who have exercised their right to decide not to have something injected into their body and take their chances with catching @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in most cases people would make such a choice out of : ( a ) concerns about the side effects from the vaccine and its effect on their immune system or general health .
( b ) concerns about the effects of over-vaccination .
The as-yet-unknown effects upon health , longevity and so on of taking too many vaccines – such consequences never having been studied However , it is a matter of personal choice , balancing risks ( if they are properly and uccurately known ) against benefits ( if they are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the best one can with sketchy , unreliable and not always honest data .
People make such choices all the time .
Some examples are : Whether to not smoke or smoke and risk the dangers to health of smoking .
Whether to not drink alcohol or drink alcohol and risk the danger to health of alcohol .
Ditto taking meds such as antidepressants and the like .
Ditto with whether to eat and drink crap and risk obesity and other health problems or eat healthily .
Ditto whether to exercise enough Ditto @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as hang gliding , motorbike racing , rock climbing , boxing etc etc All right , so those who have decided not to get vaccinated ONLY ENDANGER others who have decided to accept the so-called risks of not getting vaccinated .
But how much risk are such people being placed in in any case ?
Well , the Chief Medical Officer himself has explained to us very carefully that only the very old and very frail are in any real dangr from this bug and have much to worry about and even the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if they catch it .
For the rest , most get mild symptoms and a great many get no symptoms .
So the people really at risk are the very old and very frail .
There are not many of these to be found in the workplace .
Most of them are in care homes and hospitals or at home .
There will still be some , of course , who are vulnerable , such as asthmatics but presumably those really worried will have had the vasccine , trusting their government ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Once could argue that trusting the government ’ s word on anything carries its own health risks but that is another story .
Suffice to say here that those who have declined the government ’ s offer to inject them with a substance that materialised out of a laboratory in a record-breaking undercut of the time it usually takes to develop a safe ( ish ) vaccine have made their own free choice and accepted whatever risks there may turn out to be .
All right , so in our hypothetical workplace we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t catch it as ( from memory ) about one in five are likely to catch it .
A person can , incidentally , make it even less likely they will catch it or suffer much beyond mild symptoms if they make sure they look after their own immune system by taking vitamin D , Zinc etc , eating healthily , avoiding junk food , getting exercise , quitting or cutting down smoking , avoiding getting obese and so on ( notice how the governments never promotes this , the mantra always @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccinate ” or some such thing ) .
So what this boils down to is , IF THE VACCINE WORKS the only people “ threatened ” by the unvaccinated are other unvaccinated people who have also made their choices and exercised a right enjoyed by smokers , drinkers , sportsmen , athletes , rock climbers and so on .
And the risks to the unvaccinated are very low .
Across the general population they are very low statistically in any case but if you factor out the fact that most of the seriously @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , they are even lower .
Certainly nowhere near high enough to even remotely justify the assault on free choice due to the so-called “ threat ” of COVID19 .
But why this drive to “ vaccinate everybody and his cousin ” willy nilly .
What is behind it ?
Well , for one thing if there are no-unvaccinated people you lose your control group .
You lose having anything to compare the vaccinated with .
Imagine a vaccine that for some reason known only to the gods of pharmaceutical profits has a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ everyone poorly , more prone to getting sick , kids more prone to autism , cutting down longevity and so forth .
If you have a sector of the population that is unvaccinated you can then compare their health and longevity with that of the vaccinated and any long-terms adverse effects on human well being caused by the vaccine will show up and we can all happily lynch the criminals who poisoned us on false pretexts .
Now my HYPOTHISES ( NOT A PROVEN FACT BUT SOMETHING I THINK IS HAPPENING AND IT @ @ @ @ @ @ @ RIGHT ) is that the vaccine being forced ( it they can get away with it ) on us by a government of mind-boggling duplicity and irresponsibility is booby trapped ( either deliberately or negligently ) so that those vaccinated will , when they come into contact with the wild virus , become MORE ILL than the unvaccinated .
( See my post on it here https : //www.facebook.com/permalink.php ?
story_fbid=425359765260658 & id=100033599146575 ) .
If that happens , pains will be taken to ensure the vaccine is not looked upon as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of people remain unvaccinated , the problem of vaccinated people getting more ill or dying quicker will show up .
Excuses will be found to explain this away in the traditional manner of governments covering their asses .
But if EVERYBODY is vaccinated , no-one will be able to ask awkward questions such as , “ why are unvaccinated people not getting as sick and living longer ?
” It will be easier , in other words , if it stands out as an anomoly at all , to blame it on a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the old one .
This article is from UK Reloaded

by Caratacus
We are witnessing a government slip deeper and deeper into a sesspit of treacherous skulduggery of its own making.
It is probably what happens when you combine quite evil with quite dim.<
Now we don’t just have a dodgy, untested and possibly booby-trapped vaccine being recklessly rushed through to “protect everyone” from a virus less dangerous than flu and only a serious threat if you are very old or frail due to some other serious threat.
We also have a new nonsensical craziness to add to the government’s seriously psychotic behaviour.
Namely, the idea is being touted by some treasonous MPs that you won’t be able to work in the workplace unless you are vaccinated.
WHY? I hear you ask.
What possible danger could an unvaccinated person be to a vaccinated person?
Stretch your imagination a bit and consider an unvacinated person who goes to work in an office of, say, fifty people. Of those fifty, let us imagine that half have been good little boys and girls and gotten themselves vaccinated for some reason.
The other 25 have decided not to get vaccinated and take their chances with COVID19 which, let’s face it, is not very dangerous for the vast majority of us.
Now imagine an unvaccinated person turns up at work one day and he is infectious with COVID19.
Whom does he place in danger?
Well, not the vaccinated people IF the vaccine (a big “IF” admittedly) lives up to the hype with which the government has promoted its “let’s inject everybody with this untested experimental concoction” drive.
If the vaccine works, the vaccinated are in no danger from the unvaccinated.
They may well be in danger from any side effects of the vaccine the government has omitted to tell anyone about in its rush to get mass vaccination going. But they are not in any danger from the unvaccinated.
So who is in danger from the unvaccinated?. Why, the other unvaccinated people of course!
These are the people who have exercised their right to decide not to have something injected into their body and take their chances with catching COVID19. I’m guessing that in most cases people would make such a choice out of:
(a) concerns about the side effects from the vaccine and its effect on their immune system or general health.
(b) concerns about the effects of over-vaccination. The as-yet-unknown effects upon health, longevity and so on of taking too many vaccines – such consequences never having been studied
(c) both.
However, it is a matter of personal choice, balancing risks (if they are properly and uccurately known) against benefits (if they are properly and accurately known) or doing the best one can with sketchy, unreliable and not always honest data.
People make such choices all the time. Some examples are:
Whether to not smoke or smoke and risk the dangers to health of smoking.
Whether to not drink alcohol or drink alcohol and risk the danger to health of alcohol.
Ditto taking meds such as antidepressants and the like.
Ditto with whether to eat and drink crap and risk obesity and other health problems or eat healthily.
Ditto whether to exercise enough
Ditto whether to engage in risky sports such as hang gliding, motorbike racing, rock climbing, boxing etc etc
All right, so those who have decided not to get vaccinated ONLY ENDANGER others who have decided to accept the so-called risks of not getting vaccinated.
But how much risk are such people being placed in in any case?
Well, the Chief Medical Officer himself has explained to us very carefully that only the very old and very frail are in any real dangr from this bug and have much to worry about and even the vast majority of these survive it even if they catch it. For the rest, most get mild symptoms and a great many get no symptoms.
So the people really at risk are the very old and very frail. There are not many of these to be found in the workplace. Most of them are in care homes and hospitals or at home. There will still be some, of course, who are vulnerable, such as asthmatics but presumably those really worried will have had the vasccine, trusting their government’s promises that it will protect them.
Once could argue that trusting the government’s word on anything carries its own health risks but that is another story.
Suffice to say here that those who have declined the government’s offer to inject them with a substance that materialised out of a laboratory in a record-breaking undercut of the time it usually takes to develop a safe(ish) vaccine have made their own free choice and accepted whatever risks there may turn out to be.
All right, so in our hypothetical workplace we have 25 unvaccinated people.
Most won’t catch it as (from memory) about one in five are likely to catch it. A person can, incidentally, make it even less likely they will catch it or suffer much beyond mild symptoms if they make sure they look after their own immune system by taking vitamin D, Zinc etc, eating healthily, avoiding junk food, getting exercise, quitting or cutting down smoking, avoiding getting obese and so on (notice how the governments never promotes this, the mantra always being “lock down, isolate, vaccinate” or some such thing).
So what this boils down to is, IF THE VACCINE WORKS the only people “threatened ” by the unvaccinated are other unvaccinated people who have also made their choices and exercised a right enjoyed by smokers, drinkers, sportsmen, athletes, rock climbers and so on.
And the risks to the unvaccinated are very low. Across the general population they are very low statistically in any case but if you factor out the fact that most of the seriously at risk are not in the workplace, they are even lower.
Certainly nowhere near high enough to even remotely justify the assault on free choice due to the so-called “threat” of COVID19.
But why this drive to “vaccinate everybody and his cousin” willy nilly. What is behind it?
Well, for one thing if there are no-unvaccinated people you lose your control group. You lose having anything to compare the vaccinated with.
Imagine a vaccine that for some reason known only to the gods of pharmaceutical profits has a adverse effect on overall health, making everyone poorly, more prone to getting sick, kids more prone to autism, cutting down longevity and so forth.
If you have a sector of the population that is unvaccinated you can then compare their health and longevity with that of the vaccinated and any long-terms adverse effects on human well being caused by the vaccine will show up and we can all happily lynch the criminals who poisoned us on false pretexts.
Now my HYPOTHISES (NOT A PROVEN FACT BUT SOMETHING I THINK IS HAPPENING AND IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN IF I AM RIGHT) is that the vaccine being forced (it they can get away with it) on us by a government of mind-boggling duplicity and irresponsibility is booby trapped (either deliberately or negligently) so that those vaccinated will, when they come into contact with the wild virus, become MORE ILL than the unvaccinated. (See my post on it here https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=425359765260658&id=100033599146575).
If that happens, pains will be taken to ensure the vaccine is not looked upon as a suspect.
However, if a lot of people remain unvaccinated, the problem of vaccinated people getting more ill or dying quicker will show up. Excuses will be found to explain this away in the traditional manner of governments covering their asses.
But if EVERYBODY is vaccinated, no-one will be able to ask awkward questions such as, “why are unvaccinated people not getting as sick and living longer?”
It will be easier, in other words, if it stands out as an anomoly at all, to blame it on a new virus or a new mutation of the old one.
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-16--Sidney Powell: “We’re Getting Ready To Overturn Election Results In Multiple States”

Trump Lawyer Sidney Powell : “ We ’ re Getting Ready To Overturn Election Results In Multiple States ” Post by Tyler Durden | Written by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times Former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell , a Trump campaign lawyer , suggested in a Sunday interview that there is still more evidence coming out in President Donald Trump ’ s claims of voter fraud and irregularities .
“ We ’ re getting ready to overturn election results in multiple states , ” Powell said , saying that she has enough evidence of election fraud to launch a widespread @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t make comments without having the evidence to back it up , ” she added , saying that elections software switched “ millions of votes ” from Trump to Democratic nominee Joe Biden .
Powell notably provided legal counsel to Gen. Michael Flynn in 2019 .
She was named to Trump ’ s legal team in the past several days .
Powell said a whistleblower came forward and said the elections software was designed to “ rig elections , ” saying that “ he saw it happen in other countries , ” referring @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Smartmatic , or perhaps other software and machines .
“ We have so much evidence , I feel like it ’ s coming in through a fire hose , ” Powell said , while noting that she won ’ t reveal the evidence that she has .
“ They can stick a thumb drive in the [ voting ] machine , they can upload software to it even from the Internet … from Germany or Venezuela even , ” she said , adding that operations “ can watch votes in real-time ” and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” or alleged bad actors can “ remote access anything.
” “ We ’ ve identified mathematically the exact algorithm they ’ ve used—and planned to use from the beginning ” that allegedly switched votes to Biden , Powell remarked .
Powell also made reference to a 2019 investigation from Sens .
Amy Klobuchar ( D-Minn. ) , Elizabeth Warren ( D-Mass . )
, Ron Wyden ( D-Ore. ) , as well as other Democratic lawmakers into Dominion Voting Systems , Election Systems & Software , and Hart InterCivic .
The senators @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the voting systems .
“ ( W ) e have concerns about the spread and effect of private equity investment in many sectors of the economy , including the election technology industry—an integral part of our nation ’ s democratic process , ” wrote the lawmakers in their letters to the firms about a year ago .
“ These problems threaten the integrity of our elections and demonstrate the importance of election systems that are strong , durable , and not vulnerable to attack.
” Later in the Sunday morning interview , Powell @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voting irregularities that are inexplicable ” in states where officials believe they have valid systems .
During the election , Republicans in the House were able to flip at least 11 seats while the GOP is poised to maintain control of the Senate .
Some conservatives have questioned how such a voting pattern is possible for Biden to win the presidential election , let alone receive more votes than any other presidential candidate in American history , including President Barack Obama ’ s victory in 2008 .
The Department of Homeland Security ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Thursday calling the 2020 general election the “ most secure in American history , ” despite multiple legal challenges alleging a variety of alleged voting irregularities across a number of battleground states .
Smartmatic , in a statement on Saturday , said that it has no ties with Dominion Voting Systems .
Powell suggested that Smartmatic is operated by Dominion in the interview .
Dominion , over the past several weeks , has repeatedly denied its systems were compromised in some way .
“ In the aftermath of the 2020 general election , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ misinformation being circulated about Smartmatic and other companies that provide election technology to voting jurisdictions in the US .
We would like to dispel these incorrect statements with facts , ” the firm wrote , adding that it “ has never owned any shares or had any financial stake in Dominion Voting Systems.
” Dominion also refuted allegations that its machines changed votes from Trump to Biden on Election Day and beyond .
“ Dominion Voting Systems categorically denies any claims about any vote switching or alleged software issues with our voting systems @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a statement to The Denver Post .
“ Our systems continue to reliably and accurately count ballots , and state and local election authorities have publicly confirmed the integrity of the process.
” The Liberty Beacon Editorial Staff feels compelled to take exception to the Statement of Dominion Voting Systems as to their process and integrity , as stated above .
To that end we offer Evidence from Dominion VP Engineering Dr. Eric Coomer .
Watch… .
Dr. Eric Coomer , VP of Dominion Voting Systems : “ Officials Have Access to Manipulate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this Post by Tyler Durden | Written by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times with our sincere appreciation for the coverage .
Dominion Voting Systems : The Canadian Company At The Center Of U.S. Election Fraud Claims The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Trump Lawyer Sidney Powell: “We’re Getting Ready To Overturn Election Results In Multiple States”
Post by Tyler Durden | Written by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times
Former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, a Trump campaign lawyer, suggested in a Sunday interview that there is still more evidence coming out in President Donald Trump’s claims of voter fraud and irregularities.
“We’re getting ready to overturn election results in multiple states,” Powell said, saying that she has enough evidence of election fraud to launch a widespread criminal investigation. “I don’t make comments without having the evidence to back it up,” she added, saying that elections software switched “millions of votes” from Trump to Democratic nominee Joe Biden.
Powell notably provided legal counsel to Gen. Michael Flynn in 2019. She was named to Trump’s legal team in the past several days.
Powell said a whistleblower came forward and said the elections software was designed to “rig elections,” saying that “he saw it happen in other countries,” referring to voting systems Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic, or perhaps other software and machines.
“We have so much evidence, I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose,” Powell said, while noting that she won’t reveal the evidence that she has. “They can stick a thumb drive in the [voting] machine, they can upload software to it even from the Internet … from Germany or Venezuela even,” she said, adding that operations “can watch votes in real-time” and “can shift votes in real-time,” or alleged bad actors can “remote access anything.” “We’ve identified mathematically the exact algorithm they’ve used—and planned to use from the beginning” that allegedly switched votes to Biden, Powell remarked.
Powell also made reference to a 2019 investigation from Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), as well as other Democratic lawmakers into Dominion Voting Systems, Election Systems & Software, and Hart InterCivic. The senators had expressed concerns about the security of the voting systems.
“(W)e have concerns about the spread and effect of private equity investment in many sectors of the economy, including the election technology industry—an integral part of our nation’s democratic process,” wrote the lawmakers in their letters to the firms about a year ago. “These problems threaten the integrity of our elections and demonstrate the importance of election systems that are strong, durable, and not vulnerable to attack.”
Later in the Sunday morning interview, Powell said that her team has “detected voting irregularities that are inexplicable” in states where officials believe they have valid systems.
Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, left, and President Donald Trump in file photographs. (Getty Images; Reuters)
During the election, Republicans in the House were able to flip at least 11 seats while the GOP is poised to maintain control of the Senate. Some conservatives have questioned how such a voting pattern is possible for Biden to win the presidential election, let alone receive more votes than any other presidential candidate in American history, including President Barack Obama’s victory in 2008.
Companies Respond
The Department of Homeland Security’s cybersecurity agency issued a statement on Thursday calling the 2020 general election the “most secure in American history,” despite multiple legal challenges alleging a variety of alleged voting irregularities across a number of battleground states.
“The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double-checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result,” read the statement released by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).
Smartmatic, in a statement on Saturday, said that it has no ties with Dominion Voting Systems. Powell suggested that Smartmatic is operated by Dominion in the interview.
Dominion, over the past several weeks, has repeatedly denied its systems were compromised in some way.
“In the aftermath of the 2020 general election, there has been a great deal of misinformation being circulated about Smartmatic and other companies that provide election technology to voting jurisdictions in the US. We would like to dispel these incorrect statements with facts,” the firm wrote, adding that it “has never owned any shares or had any financial stake in Dominion Voting Systems.”
Dominion also refuted allegations that its machines changed votes from Trump to Biden on Election Day and beyond.
“Dominion Voting Systems categorically denies any claims about any vote switching or alleged software issues with our voting systems,” a company spokesperson said in a statement to The Denver Post. “Our systems continue to reliably and accurately count ballots, and state and local election authorities have publicly confirmed the integrity of the process.”
_________
The Liberty Beacon Editorial Staff feels compelled to take exception to the Statement of Dominion Voting Systems as to their process and integrity, as stated above. To that end we offer Evidence from Dominion VP Engineering Dr. Eric Coomer. Watch….
*********
Related from The Liberty Beacon:
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-11-16--Biden … the Great Pretender!

Biden … the Great Pretender!

It may be a bit soon for the Biden ’ s to be measuring for new drapes and ordering a fresh set of presidential china for a stay at the White House .
Maybe it ’ s not a good idea to be picking cabinet members and formulating executive orders before being certified for the office .
It also seems a little cheeky to be gathering international allies in support of the proposed great reset of the entire world order .
History shows that it would not be the first or last time a celebration of ascension to head of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pretenders to the thrones of nations and empires is voluminous .
France , Britain , Russia , Japan , China and even Hawaii have seen imposters who sought to overthrow the existing order and seize power .
In all cases , the imposters sought to bypass the laws of succession and established institutions in order to steer the nation or empire in the direction they wished it to go .
The hope always was to seize the resources of the conquered entity and to expand their power .
For Jews and Christians , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ upsets in history are chronicled in the biblical record .
The message of both stories is that the affairs of states are not always in the hands of pretenders or the presumptuous , but in the hands of Jehovah , God , who loves his people .
The book of Daniel records that Belshazzar , who , though in the line of succession , was an arrogant and pretentious ruler who was over confident in the dizzying power handed down to him by his father , King Nabonidus of Babylon .
He held @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Part of the celebration included making sure the diasporic Jews within the kingdom were completely humiliated .
To that end , Belshazzar ordered that the golden vessels seized from the temple of defeated Jerusalem were brought out in order that his courtiers , wives and concubines drink from them .
It was a crude symbolic gesture that the god Bel , after whom Belshazzar was named , was seen as the god who ruled over the God of the Jews .
At the height of the festivities , a hand appeared and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the banquet hall .
Terror seized the king and he called for the Jewish prophet Daniel , who read the handwriting on the wall : “ Mene , mene , tekel parsin.
” He told the king the meaning of the mysterious words .
Belshazzar ’ s kingdom had been weighed and found wanting and the city would be destroyed .
True to Daniel ’ s prophetic word , Babylon fell on October 12 , 539 to the Persian general Gobyras .
Belshazzar died and Cyrus entered the city 17 days later to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spared and retained a high position in the Persian empire during the reign of Cyrus and then Darius the Great .
Cyrus proved to be a friend of the Jews , aiding them to return to Jerusalem to rebuild their temple .
There is another bible story , which is about the near extinction of the Jews , who were considered by a palace pretender named Haman to be a pestilential group of deplorables who had to be gotten rid of .
The king at that time was Ahasuerus , who was the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ network of procurers sought out girls to satisfy his insatiable appetite for young virgins .
Among those young women was the Jew Esther , who found favor with the king and became his wife—but she kept her Jewish identity secret .
Haman ’ s hatred of Esther ’ s protector Mordecai , who was also a Jew , burned so hotly he decided to destroy all the Jews in the kingdom in order to ensure his rise to the top .
He compiled a list of accusations against the deplorables , who were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ new world order .
They insisted on keeping their customary ways of worshipping their God rather than obeying the king and his laws .
Haman made ready his plans to hang high Mordecai and the resistors .
But events took a peculiar and sudden turn when Ahasuerus was told of the plot by Queen Esther .
The result was that the Jews fought back against those who sought to destroy them and the pretender to power was hanged from his own gibbet along with his sons , who were doubtless co-conspirators .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the same pattern .
Denying the legitimacy of the order in which they have failed to succeed by merit , they lie , cheat , manipulate in every way , gathering co-conspirators and making secret alliances in order to steal authority ; to get power the easy way .
If they succeed , they then use the power for personal gain , and for distributing wealth to their friends and to the allies who will help finish off the previous order they despised and hijacked .
Meanwhile , they attempt a great reset @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Russia , turning it into the communist Soviet Union .
A royal lineage is proposed — perhaps the House of Biden ?
Favors already received from friendly international organizations and entities increase , and are handed out to co-conspirators , family members and friends .
History is changed , with the story of the defeated order going down the memory hole .
The means of communication are seized , and the new story line is blared from every access .
A new reality is created , and the demise of the old order @ @ @ @ @ @ @ previous foundations .
New constitutions are written , new judiciaries are formed and a plethora of new laws and regulations are issued in order that the pretender retain power .
Lists of enemies are drawn up and punishments ordered .
But not every pretender succeeds .
In fact , the failures are probably greater than the successes .
Miraculous turnarounds often happen .
It may well be that the American people will not accept the latest pretender , but will instead rise up in protest .
After all , Biden and his allies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the days of the Obama regime .
They have vowed to go after the pro-life movement , destroy the energy industries , shut down the economy because of Covid-19 and persecute Jewish synagogues and Christian churches .
Ominously , along with the like-minded anti-Semite Bill de Blasio of New York City , the Obama/Biden alliance has made its hostility toward Israel and the Jews apparent .
The House of Obama and Biden do not consider Jews to be particularly favored by God .
From the beginning of Trump ’ s presidency , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and that he has to go .
The attacks against him have been unceasing ; and at least some of those attacks have been because he has favored Israel .
But there is the hope the judiciary , state legislatures and other mechanisms of the republic will deny the pretender who seeks to take the throne via vote fraud .
He and his allies may find themselves in the position of Belshazzar and Haman , left standing alone like a flagstaff on a hill without supporting troops .
May that be the case @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the American republic and her institutions stand .

Biden, the Great Pretender
By: Fay Voshell
It may be a bit soon for the Biden’s to be measuring for new drapes and ordering a fresh set of presidential china for a stay at the White House. Maybe it’s not a good idea to be picking cabinet members and formulating executive orders before being certified for the office. It also seems a little cheeky to be gathering international allies in support of the proposed great reset of the entire world order.
History shows that it would not be the first or last time a celebration of ascension to head of state proved premature. The number of pretenders to the thrones of nations and empires is voluminous. France, Britain, Russia, Japan, China and even Hawaii have seen imposters who sought to overthrow the existing order and seize power. In all cases, the imposters sought to bypass the laws of succession and established institutions in order to steer the nation or empire in the direction they wished it to go. The hope always was to seize the resources of the conquered entity and to expand their power.
For Jews and Christians, two of the most famous and important upsets in history are chronicled in the biblical record. The message of both stories is that the affairs of states are not always in the hands of pretenders or the presumptuous, but in the hands of Jehovah, God, who loves his people.
The book of Daniel records that Belshazzar, who, though in the line of succession, was an arrogant and pretentious ruler who was over confident in the dizzying power handed down to him by his father, King Nabonidus of Babylon. He held a huge banquet in honor of himself. Part of the celebration included making sure the diasporic Jews within the kingdom were completely humiliated. To that end, Belshazzar ordered that the golden vessels seized from the temple of defeated Jerusalem were brought out in order that his courtiers, wives and concubines drink from them. It was a crude symbolic gesture that the god Bel, after whom Belshazzar was named, was seen as the god who ruled over the God of the Jews.
At the height of the festivities, a hand appeared and wrote a message on the wall of the banquet hall. Terror seized the king and he called for the Jewish prophet Daniel, who read the handwriting on the wall: “Mene, mene, tekel parsin.” He told the king the meaning of the mysterious words. Belshazzar’s kingdom had been weighed and found wanting and the city would be destroyed.
True to Daniel’s prophetic word, Babylon fell on October 12, 539 to the Persian general Gobyras. Belshazzar died and Cyrus entered the city 17 days later to assume command. Daniel the Jew was spared and retained a high position in the Persian empire during the reign of Cyrus and then Darius the Great. Cyrus proved to be a friend of the Jews, aiding them to return to Jerusalem to rebuild their temple.
There is another bible story, which is about the near extinction of the Jews, who were considered by a palace pretender named Haman to be a pestilential group of deplorables who had to be gotten rid of.
The king at that time was Ahasuerus, who was the Jeffrey Epstein of his day. His network of procurers sought out girls to satisfy his insatiable appetite for young virgins. Among those young women was the Jew Esther, who found favor with the king and became his wife—but she kept her Jewish identity secret.
Haman’s hatred of Esther’s protector Mordecai, who was also a Jew, burned so hotly he decided to destroy all the Jews in the kingdom in order to ensure his rise to the top. He compiled a list of accusations against the deplorables, who were blamed for not assimilating into the gods’ new world order. They insisted on keeping their customary ways of worshipping their God rather than obeying the king and his laws. Haman made ready his plans to hang high Mordecai and the resistors.
But events took a peculiar and sudden turn when Ahasuerus was told of the plot by Queen Esther. The result was that the Jews fought back against those who sought to destroy them and the pretender to power was hanged from his own gibbet along with his sons, who were doubtless co-conspirators.
Historically, pretenders to thrones all follow the same pattern. Denying the legitimacy of the order in which they have failed to succeed by merit, they lie, cheat, manipulate in every way, gathering co-conspirators and making secret alliances in order to steal authority; to get power the easy way. If they succeed, they then use the power for personal gain, and for distributing wealth to their friends and to the allies who will help finish off the previous order they despised and hijacked. Meanwhile, they attempt a great reset, much as the Bolsheviks reset tsarists Russia, turning it into the communist Soviet Union.
A royal lineage is proposed — perhaps the House of Biden? Favors already received from friendly international organizations and entities increase, and are handed out to co-conspirators, family members and friends.
History is changed, with the story of the defeated order going down the memory hole. The means of communication are seized, and the new story line is blared from every access.
A new reality is created, and the demise of the old order accomplished by targeting resisters and gutting the previous foundations. New constitutions are written, new judiciaries are formed and a plethora of new laws and regulations are issued in order that the pretender retain power. Lists of enemies are drawn up and punishments ordered.
But not every pretender succeeds. In fact, the failures are probably greater than the successes. Miraculous turnarounds often happen.
It may well be that the American people will not accept the latest pretender, but will instead rise up in protest. After all, Biden and his allies have made their odious intentions clear from the days of the Obama regime. They have vowed to go after the pro-life movement, destroy the energy industries, shut down the economy because of Covid-19 and persecute Jewish synagogues and Christian churches.
Ominously, along with the like-minded anti-Semite Bill de Blasio of New York City, the Obama/Biden alliance has made its hostility toward Israel and the Jews apparent. The House of Obama and Biden do not consider Jews to be particularly favored by God.
From the beginning of Trump’s presidency, the Left has claimed he is the pretender and that he has to go. The attacks against him have been unceasing; and at least some of those attacks have been because he has favored Israel.
But there is the hope the judiciary, state legislatures and other mechanisms of the republic will deny the pretender who seeks to take the throne via vote fraud. He and his allies may find themselves in the position of Belshazzar and Haman, left standing alone like a flagstaff on a hill without supporting troops.
May that be the case, and let us hope and pray the American republic and her institutions stand.
••••
The above article (Biden, the Great Pretender) was created and published by American Thinker and is republished here under “Fair Use” (see posted disclaimer below) with attribution to the articles author Fay Voshell and americanthinker.com. TLB recommends you visit American Thinker for more great articles and information. About the Author: Fay Voshell holds a M.Div. from Princeton Theological Seminary, which awarded her the prize for excellence in systematic theology. Her essays have appeared in many online magazines. She has been a regular contributor to American Thinker for almost a decade. She may be reached at [email protected]
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.