thelibertybeacon--2020-06-16--John Bolton’s New Book; Will it Cost Him his Freedom?

Bolton ’ s Bold Move Could Result in Loss Of His Profits Or His Freedom Former National Security Adviser John Bolton has pledged to release his new tell-all book , “ The Room Where It Happened : A White House Memoir , ” regardless of the lack of pre-publication approval from the Administration .
This includes an ABC special this weekend to kick off his release .
The move is extremely risky and the law is not on the side of Bolton who could conceivably not only lose his profits but his freedom over such a dispute .
The game @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the White House grew more intense yesterday when President Donald Trump and Attorney General Bill Barr stated that the book contained classified , not just privileged , information .
Barr also confirmed that Bolton has not completed the required pre-publication review .
I share the concern over the motivations behind this slow walked review .
The book is obviously going to be very damaging to Trump just before the election .
I have always opposed such tell-all books , particularly those rushing to print during an ongoing administration .
It is a betrayal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ confidentiality that they need to function .
However , the pre-publication review process should not be used for the purpose of protecting a president from embarrassment or political liability .
The problem is that this is not just about privileged information any longer and Bolton agreed to complete this process in his NDA .
To put it simply , that was the price of the ticket to be national security adviser .
That is why the reference to classified information is a game changer .
Courts defer greatly to the Executive Branch on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ noted , discussions of a president with the heads of foreign nations are ordinarily classified .
Finally , the non-disclosure forms are designed primarily to prevent such disclosures .
I have sign that form many times over the last 30 years due to my work on classified cases .
It is sweeping and unambiguous .
You sign away the right to publish pending the review and changes specified in the pre-publication review .
First and foremost , Bolton could face an injunction to prevent publication .
As I have previously noted , I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because of the failure to pursue an injunction as this book was being printed and stored in warehouses .
If there was clearly classified material in the book , why would the government risk disclosure in millions of copies sitting around in barely secure warehouses ?
However , the Administration could certainly move now to enjoin release in light of the statements of Bolton and his publisher , Simon and Schuster .
Second , Bolton could lose his profits .
In 2016 , former Navy Seal Matt Bissonnette ( Pictured writing under the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ No Easy Day , ” about the raid that killed Osama bin Laden .
He had to pay the federal government a reported $ 6.8 million to avoid prosecution .
In Snepp v. United States , 44 US 507 ( 1980 ) , the Court considered a book by Frank Snepp who signed a NDA as part of his employment at the CIA .
He then published a book about CIA activities in South Vietnam without first submitting his manuscript to the Agency for review .
A lower court denied Snepp royalties from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ approval .
The Supreme Court upheld that ruling and started with a discussion that could paint Bolton in the same way as a person who violated the essential trust demanded from such officials : Snepp ’ s employment with the CIA involved an extremely high degree of trust .
In the opening sentence of the agreement that he signed , Snepp explicitly recognized that he was entering a trust relationship .
The trust agreement specifically imposed the obligation not to publish any information relating to the Agency without submitting the information for clearance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ after undertaking this obligation — he had been “ assigned to various positions of trust ” and that he had been granted “ frequent access to classified information , including information regarding intelligence sources and methods.
” 456 F. Supp .
at 178 .
[ Footnote 6 ] Snepp published his book about CIA activities on the basis of this background and exposure .
He deliberately and surreptitiously violated his obligation to submit all material for prepublication review .
Thus , he exposed the classified information with which he had been entrusted to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ added : “ Quite apart from the plain language of the agreement , the nature of Snepp ’ s duties and his conceded access to confidential sources and materials could establish a trust relationship .
Few types of governmental employment involve a higher degree of trust than that reposed in a CIA employee with Snepp ’ s duties.
” The obvious example of a higher degree of trust would be found in the actual national security adviser himself .
There is also the question of potential criminal liability .
This threat is less @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be a knowing release of classified information if Bolton was notified of the content and proceeded to publish anyway .
It is also notable that Barr is known as particularly protective of privileged and classified information .
Bolton did not complete the process and , according to the statements yesterday , he did not comply with the removal of the material .
We have not seen such prosecutions in past cases like the publication of “ No Easy Day.
” I still view this threat under the Espionage Act to be less acute @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for such application to a NDA violation .
Bolton has a strong lawyer in Chuck Cooper ( Pictured ) who has a great deal of experience and intestinal fortitude .
However , he should be particularly cautious after yesterday .
Now that the President and Attorney General have publicly declared that the book contains classified information , it may be difficult to back off from an aggressive response to Bolton .
To make such a public declaration and then do little would be viewed as undermining NDAs in the future .
Bolton has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ defining case for the government ’ s control of such information .
There is a clear menacing element to Barr ’ s words that the process has not been completed .
Bolton may have been given just enough rope to hang himself if he unilaterally cuts off the process .
It seems clear to me that this process was slow walked .
However , there is no guarantee that the process will be completed expeditiously .
To the contrary , the process itself is viewed as a speed bump for officials who want @ @ @ @ @ @ @ before the completion of a presidential term .
Complaining about the glacial pace is a bit like complaining about the weather in Washington .
As the earlier book controversy indicates , this will be “ No Easy Day ” for Bolton .
Professor Jonathan Turley is a nationally recognized legal scholar who has written extensively in areas ranging from constitutional law to legal theory to tort law .
He has written over three dozen academic articles that have appeared in a variety of leading law journals at Cornell , Duke , Georgetown , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and other schools .
After a stint at Tulane Law School , Professor Turley joined the George Washington faculty in 1990 and , in 1998 , was given the prestigious Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law , the youngest chaired professor in the school ’ s history .
In addition to his extensive publications , Professor Turley has served as counsel in some of the most notable cases in the last two decades including the representation of whistleblowers , military personnel , judges , members of Congress , and a wide range @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

Bolton’s Bold Move Could Result in Loss Of His Profits Or His Freedom
The game of chicken being played between Bolton and the White House
JONATHAN TURLEY
Former National Security Adviser John Bolton has pledged to release his new tell-all book, “The Room Where It Happened: A White House Memoir,” regardless of the lack of pre-publication approval from the Administration. This includes an ABC special this weekend to kick off his release. The move is extremely risky and the law is not on the side of Bolton who could conceivably not only lose his profits but his freedom over such a dispute.
The game of chicken being played between Bolton and the White House grew more intense yesterday when President Donald Trump and Attorney General Bill Barr stated that the book contained classified, not just privileged, information. Barr also confirmed that Bolton has not completed the required pre-publication review.
I share the concern over the motivations behind this slow walked review. The book is obviously going to be very damaging to Trump just before the election. I have always opposed such tell-all books, particularly those rushing to print during an ongoing administration. It is a betrayal of a president and the understanding of confidentiality that they need to function. However, the pre-publication review process should not be used for the purpose of protecting a president from embarrassment or political liability. The problem is that this is not just about privileged information any longer and Bolton agreed to complete this process in his NDA. To put it simply, that was the price of the ticket to be national security adviser.
That is why the reference to classified information is a game changer. Courts defer greatly to the Executive Branch on such classifications. Moreover, as Barr noted, discussions of a president with the heads of foreign nations are ordinarily classified. Finally, the non-disclosure forms are designed primarily to prevent such disclosures. I have sign that form many times over the last 30 years due to my work on classified cases. It is sweeping and unambiguous. You sign away the right to publish pending the review and changes specified in the pre-publication review.
Publication
First and foremost, Bolton could face an injunction to prevent publication. As I have previously noted, I find the claim of classified content surprising because of the failure to pursue an injunction as this book was being printed and stored in warehouses. If there was clearly classified material in the book, why would the government risk disclosure in millions of copies sitting around in barely secure warehouses? However, the Administration could certainly move now to enjoin release in light of the statements of Bolton and his publisher, Simon and Schuster.
Profits
Second, Bolton could lose his profits. In 2016, former Navy Seal Matt Bissonnette (Pictured writing under the pen name Mark Owen) wrote “No Easy Day,” about the raid that killed Osama bin Laden. He had to pay the federal government a reported $6.8 million to avoid prosecution. In Snepp v. United States, 44 US 507 (1980), the Court considered a book by Frank Snepp who signed a NDA as part of his employment at the CIA. He then published a book about CIA activities in South Vietnam without first submitting his manuscript to the Agency for review. A lower court denied Snepp royalties from his book for his failure to secure approval. The Supreme Court upheld that ruling and started with a discussion that could paint Bolton in the same way as a person who violated the essential trust demanded from such officials:
Snepp’s employment with the CIA involved an extremely high degree of trust. In the opening sentence of the agreement that he signed, Snepp explicitly recognized that he was entering a trust relationship. The trust agreement specifically imposed the obligation not to publish any information relating to the Agency without submitting the information for clearance. Snepp stipulated at trial that — after undertaking this obligation — he had been “assigned to various positions of trust” and that he had been granted “frequent access to classified information, including information regarding intelligence sources and methods.” 456 F. Supp. at 178. [Footnote 6] Snepp published his book about CIA activities on the basis of this background and exposure. He deliberately and surreptitiously violated his obligation to submit all material for prepublication review. Thus, he exposed the classified information with which he had been entrusted to the risk of disclosure.
The Court added : “Quite apart from the plain language of the agreement, the nature of Snepp’s duties and his conceded access to confidential sources and materials could establish a trust relationship. Few types of governmental employment involve a higher degree of trust than that reposed in a CIA employee with Snepp’s duties.” The obvious example of a higher degree of trust would be found in the actual national security adviser himself.
Criminal Liability
There is also the question of potential criminal liability. This threat is less pronounced but not insignificant. This would be a knowing release of classified information if Bolton was notified of the content and proceeded to publish anyway. It is also notable that Barr is known as particularly protective of privileged and classified information. Bolton did not complete the process and, according to the statements yesterday, he did not comply with the removal of the material. We have not seen such prosecutions in past cases like the publication of “No Easy Day.” I still view this threat under the Espionage Act to be less acute but he could prove a test case for such application to a NDA violation.
Bolton has a strong lawyer in Chuck Cooper (Pictured) who has a great deal of experience and intestinal fortitude. However, he should be particularly cautious after yesterday. Now that the President and Attorney General have publicly declared that the book contains classified information, it may be difficult to back off from an aggressive response to Bolton. To make such a public declaration and then do little would be viewed as undermining NDAs in the future. Bolton has the unfortunate distinction of now being a defining case for the government’s control of such information.
There is a clear menacing element to Barr’s words that the process has not been completed. Bolton may have been given just enough rope to hang himself if he unilaterally cuts off the process. It seems clear to me that this process was slow walked. However, there is no guarantee that the process will be completed expeditiously. To the contrary, the process itself is viewed as a speed bump for officials who want to cash in on a tell-all books before the completion of a presidential term. Complaining about the glacial pace is a bit like complaining about the weather in Washington.
As the earlier book controversy indicates, this will be “No Easy Day” for Bolton.
*********
Pictorial content added by (TLB) editors.
(TLB) published this article from J
Bio
Professor Jonathan Turley is a nationally recognized legal scholar who has written extensively in areas ranging from constitutional law to legal theory to tort law. He has written over three dozen academic articles that have appeared in a variety of leading law journals at Cornell, Duke, Georgetown, Harvard, Northwestern, University of Chicago, and other schools.
After a stint at Tulane Law School, Professor Turley joined the George Washington faculty in 1990 and, in 1998, was given the prestigious Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law, the youngest chaired professor in the school’s history. In addition to his extensive publications, Professor Turley has served as counsel in some of the most notable cases in the last two decades including the representation of whistleblowers, military personnel, judges, members of Congress, and a wide range of other clients.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-06-16--In Seattle’s CHAZ, would-be revolutionaries vie to control the narrative

( TLB ) Editors note : More Seattle news and updates at the bottom of this story .
In Seattle ’ s CHAZ , would-be revolutionaries vie to control the narrative By | Just the News From somewhere in cyberspace , a revolutionary activist pleaded with nontraditional media to reclaim the lost story of the Seattle protest zone , where — one week into its existence -— fissures have erupted between traditionalists and revisionists .
“ We are calling for citizen journalists and independent media to help take back the narrative , ” wrote the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone webmaster @ @ @ @ @ @ @ original CHAZ has been hijacked .
The webmaster , “ Louis Blanqui , ” told Just the News that the real story must be told .
Increasingly , though , as questions arise over who runs the enclave and where it is headed , the narrative has grown amorphous .
The CHAZ chronicle began fairly clearly on June 8 , when protestors captured six blocks in the Capitol Hill neighborhood , after Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan told police to abandon their embattled post in the neighborhood ’ s East Precinct .
The protests @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s death last month at the hands of Minneapolis police .
A sign marking the border of the “ Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone ” in Seattle , Washington ( SOPA Images / Getty Images ) Using fences and barricades , Seattle protesters blocked off an area encompassing the police station , and marked territory with a sign declaring : “ You Are Now Entering Free Cap Hill.
” They issued a set of demands that included free housing , free health care , free college , and abolishing the Seattle Police Department @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a scene that was part street festival , part open-air concert , replete with street art , free food , camping , and a community garden .
In one set of images , people of varying ethnicity roamed with and without masks , mostly on foot and some via bicycle , while music played and dogs barked .
The settlers planted squash and corn , “ Blanqui ” told Just the News .
As the week progressed , though , the storyline changed .
The halcyon rooftop livestreams notwithstanding , less idyllic images @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one video , posted on Twitter , a man rages that his car has been broken into , and his keys and cell phone stolen .
In another , a confrontation turns into a fist fight .
City officials sought to hold peace talks with the protestors , but reportedly were stymied at first because no one seems to be in charge of the CHAZ .
One longtime community activist , Nikkita Oliver — who once ran for mayor , and has been spotted around the CHAZ — seemed a likely commander , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ I ’ m not the leader , ” said Oliver , speaking to a reporter .
Rap artist Raz Simone arrived inside the zone , and soon was dubbed the warlord of the CHAZ .
He , too , denied being in charge , but spoke about his vision for the enclave , and appeared in several videos posted to Twitter , playing either emcee or activist , depending on the situation .
Yet another purported leader , who earlier was pictured with Mayor Durkan , entered the CHAZ and spoke @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not an autonomous zone , this is a peaceful protest , ” said the man , who was identified as David Lewis — and who was criticized for being too close to police .
None of the purported leaders fully took charge of the community that began last week with a wide-ranging list of demands .
“ Things got kind of messed up , ” said one protestor , who calls herself only Willow .
“ A lot of the message turned into a different message , like , I don ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people really are.
” Nor will all of the protesters say who they are , claiming they don ’ t feel “ safe ” nor “ comfortable ” revealing their identities .
Some who spoke to Just the News only used first names : Willow , or Robin .
While theirs are reminiscent of commune culture , “ Louis Blanqui ” is named for a 19th century French socialist who advocated armed insurrection .
“ I chose the name by searching ‘ Paris commune leaders ’ and picking the first one , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But , as vocal CHAZ denizens began distancing themselves from the “ autonomous zone ” label , “ Blanqui ” seemed not interested in armed insurrection , but in predicting defeat for the movement .
“ The police collaborators and self-destructive iconoclasts attempting a renaming are winning , so I expect the message of the website to be completely abandoned by protesters as they ’ re overrun by opportunists , ” he told Just the News .
Over the weekend , activists inside the enclave changed the name of the CHAZ to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or , alternately , Organized ) Protest .
The original storyline changed .
The enclave became not the work of radical secessionists , but of protesters .
“ Blanqui ” sent out a call for citizen journalists to retake the narrative .
“ Please come down with your interview equipment , ” he wrote .
“ The revolution will not be televised.
” ( TLB ) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News Some emphasis and pictorial content added by ( TLB ) Click Here to read about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CHAZ has guns : Seattle autonomous zone ‘ warlord ’ filmed handing out AR-15s to followers Seattle bans police use of tear gas , pepper spray & chokeholds as anarchist crowd reigns over portion of city The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

(TLB) Editors note: More Seattle news and updates at the bottom of this story.
In Seattle’s CHAZ, would-be revolutionaries vie to control the narrative
One week into its existence, the leaderless protest zone strives to define itself
By Susan Katz Keating
From somewhere in cyberspace, a revolutionary activist pleaded with nontraditional media to reclaim the lost story of the Seattle protest zone, where — one week into its existence -— fissures have erupted between traditionalists and revisionists.
“We are calling for citizen journalists and independent media to help take back the narrative,” wrote the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone webmaster, who lamented that Seattle’s original CHAZ has been hijacked. The webmaster, “Louis Blanqui,” told Just the News that the real story must be told.
Increasingly, though, as questions arise over who runs the enclave and where it is headed, the narrative has grown amorphous.
The CHAZ chronicle began fairly clearly on June 8, when protestors captured six blocks in the Capitol Hill neighborhood, after Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan told police to abandon their embattled post in the neighborhood’s East Precinct. The protests came in the wake of George Floyd’s death last month at the hands of Minneapolis police.
A sign marking the border of the “Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone” in Seattle, Washington (SOPA Images / Getty Images)
Using fences and barricades, Seattle protesters blocked off an area encompassing the police station, and marked territory with a sign declaring: “You Are Now Entering Free Cap Hill.”
Getty Image
They issued a set of demands that included free housing, free health care, free college, and abolishing the Seattle Police Department.
Rooftop cameras on one corner live-streamed a scene that was part street festival, part open-air concert, replete with street art, free food, camping, and a community garden. In one set of images, people of varying ethnicity roamed with and without masks, mostly on foot and some via bicycle, while music played and dogs barked.
The settlers planted squash and corn, “Blanqui” told Just the News.
As the week progressed, though, the storyline changed. The halcyon rooftop livestreams notwithstanding, less idyllic images emerged from the ground level. In one video, posted on Twitter, a man rages that his car has been broken into, and his keys and cell phone stolen. In another, a confrontation turns into a fist fight.
City officials sought to hold peace talks with the protestors, but reportedly were stymied at first because no one seems to be in charge of the CHAZ.
One longtime community activist, Nikkita Oliver — who once ran for mayor, and has been spotted around the CHAZ — seemed a likely commander, but denied that she is in charge.
“I’m not the leader,” said Oliver, speaking to a reporter.
Rap artist Raz Simone arrived inside the zone, and soon was dubbed the warlord of the CHAZ. He, too, denied being in charge, but spoke about his vision for the enclave, and appeared in several videos posted to Twitter, playing either emcee or activist, depending on the situation.
Yet another purported leader, who earlier was pictured with Mayor Durkan, entered the CHAZ and spoke to a crowd.
“This is not an autonomous zone, this is a peaceful protest,” said the man, who was identified as David Lewis — and who was criticized for being too close to police.
None of the purported leaders fully took charge of the community that began last week with a wide-ranging list of demands.
“Things got kind of messed up,” said one protestor, who calls herself only Willow. “A lot of the message turned into a different message, like, I don’t know what it was or who these people really are.”
Nor will all of the protesters say who they are, claiming they don’t feel “safe” nor “comfortable” revealing their identities. Some who spoke to Just the News only used first names: Willow, or Robin. While theirs are reminiscent of commune culture, “Louis Blanqui” is named for a 19th century French socialist who advocated armed insurrection.
“I chose the name by searching ‘Paris commune leaders’ and picking the first one,” the modern “Blanqui” said. But, as vocal CHAZ denizens began distancing themselves from the “autonomous zone” label, “Blanqui” seemed not interested in armed insurrection, but in predicting defeat for the movement.
“The police collaborators and self-destructive iconoclasts attempting a renaming are winning, so I expect the message of the website to be completely abandoned by protesters as they’re overrun by opportunists,” he told Just the News.
Over the weekend, activists inside the enclave changed the name of the CHAZ to the CHOP, for Capitol Hill Occupied (or, alternately, Organized) Protest. The original storyline changed. The enclave became not the work of radical secessionists, but of protesters.
“Blanqui” sent out a call for citizen journalists to retake the narrative.
“Please come down with your interview equipment,” he wrote. “The revolution will not be televised.”
*********
(TLB) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News
Some emphasis and pictorial content added by (TLB)
Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News
Additional Seattle coverage/RT-USA News
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-06-16--Introducing ‘TRUTH’ (Weekly Health/Vaccine Series) with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

I have probably used this same opening argument on several of my related articles over the years … How many times must something be said before it is realized to be truth ?
That is what this , and the attached video series are hoping to find out … or to spark … We live in a reality today were applied ( programmed ) ignorance and blind trust are two of the prime movers for the crumbling of the most prosperous , healthy , and powerful society this planet had ever witnessed … the good old USA .
By far @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the fact that this society has fallen from the healthiest and most vibrant nation globally , to the sickest and most chronically ill nation in modern history … in just three short generations .
If you stop to consider that we as a nation spend approximately ten times the amount of money as any other nation ( on average ) on our healthcare , and brag the highest level of medical technology … the only possible answer for this catastrophic fall is … it is INTENTIONAL via either greed or agenda !
If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it with us … We as a society are conditioned from birth to place total confidence and trust in certain individuals within said society .
This is Readily apparent for those that would lead us , and those that tend to our health .
Modern Doctors and healthcare providers are afforded unquestioned faith in their abilities and counsel , with an admiration that transcends logic … especially when considering my opening comments concerning the rapidly failing health of America .
Please consider just how blatantly the deck is stacked against we Americans .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ focused heavily on this society with Americans being the most exposed to : … and that is the short list .
Each and every one of these mechanisms are by themselves a blight on our health … but the synergistic combination of many , or all of them simultaneously leads to catastrophic results … the results we are seeing today !
Yet even with the resulting massive rise in health disasters such as Autism , Dementia , Alzheimer disease , Diabetes , Autoimmune dysfunctions , Food Allergies , Cancer , infertility , etc… @ @ @ @ @ @ @ higher rate ( or soon to be ) than any other industrialized nation on this planet … we see no massive push by our supposed leaders or health agencies to get to the root of this catastrophic trend .
WHY ?
By far the most concerning of these destructive mechanisms , due to its continuously conditioned ( programmed ) acceptance by this society , its erroneously fabled accomplishments , and promise of lifesaving capability , is Vaccines .
Yet for anyone who has done any research into their lack of proven efficacy , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rising incidences of harm up to and including death , trying to understand why this society blindly allows their rapidly increasing proliferation is a huge red flag !
One example is the blatant statement from the CDC whereby they state that vaccines never have , never could and never will cause autism … except : The most painful aspect of the massive damage caused by over a century of increased vaccine proliferation , is the fact that by far the most prolific and blatant anti-vaccine activists are … those who have lost a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ witnessed their vulnerable child triggered into a life of autism , or other life wrecking maladies , as a result of vaccines .
And this accounts for MANY ( and growing daily ) anti-vaccine activists !
The massive guilt and lasting pain a parent or loved one will suffer is the knowledge that … So is there information available , information that can be accessed easily to mitigate these painful scenarios ?
Most will tell you when queried to “ ask your doctor ” , but the truth of the matter is these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of knowledge , the greed of profit ( kickbacks on vaccines ) , the lack of accountability , and the unwillingness to afford the time with each patient to cover all the possibilities or ramifications of vaccines ( even if they were aware themselves ) .
An example of the blatant un-truths and intentionally applied ignorance you will receive from said doctors is … When asked by concerned parents prior to their infants being vaccinated “ What are the chances of my child being harmed by these vaccines ?
” … The canned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a Million.
” This is by far the most popular answer as if it comes straight from a med school text-book , and this is a blatant lie !
• None Who can/do we trust to tell us what others wont … the “ TRUTH ” ?
• None Who can/do we trust to provide us with the information we need to protect ourselves and our much more vulnerable children ?
• None Who can/do we turn to when no one else will enlighten us as to the reality of Big Pharma ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ • None Who can/do we trust when we are blatantly aware that our government ( tasked with our good health ) can not be trusted , and in fact is complicit in most that harms us ?
TLB has been partnered with Children ’ s Health Defense since before that was their name ( used to be World Mercury Project ) and we are proud to share their great work and information .
This project is run by Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. , and is a premier site for vaccine ( and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ … factual information … that can be trusted and used to build a safe and responsible plan for protecting your health and that of your loved ones .
RFK Jr. has taken this one step further by stepping forward to provide a weekly show that goes to great lengths to make sure you have the TRUTH !
Below are the premier and first three shows in this series .
We strongly suggest you watch them and make the time weekly to watch future episodes … because knowing the TRUTH can in fact be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In this first episode of our new weekly “ TRUTH ” series , Polly Tommey and Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. kicked off the new CHD Channel on Peeps TV with a lively discussion on a wide range of relevant topics in the health freedom movement .
RFK , Jr. shed light on conflict of interest in the development of vaccines , early red flags in the Moderna coronavirus vaccine trials , the new “ Vaccine Czar ” , pathogenic priming and much more .
In this episode of our weekly “ TRUTH @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with Polly Tommey about the health epidemics of children , delving even deeper into the specific injuries caused by vaccinations , including those listed on the product inserts .
Discussion surrounded the fact that there is essentially no safety testing for vaccines ; and , once citizens know this information and do their research , they become steadfast advocates who can ’ t turn away .
The episode closed with a discussion of rights to refuse vaccinations and that parents shouldn ’ t be bullied !
In this episode of our weekly “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spoke with Polly Tommey about the health epidemics of children , flu vaccines , mRNA vaccines , media censorship and took questions from the viewers .
( All episodes can also be found on the CHD Channel on Peeps TV , a network on Roku .
Roku is accessible from any Smart TV and can be purchased separately for older TVs . )
In this episode of our weekly “ TRUTH ” series , RFK , Jr. spoke with Polly Tommey about the suffering of children and families in Africa and India caused @ @ @ @ @ @ @ promoted by Bill Gates .
They also discuss the power Dr. Anthony Fauci has in steering the direction of research funded by taxpayers .
( All episodes can be found on CHD ’ s website and social media , and on the CHD Channel found on Peeps TV , a network on Roku .
Roku is accessible from any Smart TV and can be purchased separately for older TVs . )

Introducing ‘TRUTH’ (Weekly Health/Vaccine Series) with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Includes Initial Episodes 1 – 4
By: Roger Landry (TLB)
I have probably used this same opening argument on several of my related articles over the years … How many times must something be said before it is realized to be truth? That is what this, and the attached video series are hoping to find out … or to spark …
We live in a reality today were applied (programmed) ignorance and blind trust are two of the prime movers for the crumbling of the most prosperous, healthy, and powerful society this planet had ever witnessed … the good old USA.
By far the worst of these depressing scenarios is the fact that this society has fallen from the healthiest and most vibrant nation globally, to the sickest and most chronically ill nation in modern history … in just three short generations.
If you stop to consider that we as a nation spend approximately ten times the amount of money as any other nation (on average) on our healthcare, and brag the highest level of medical technology … the only possible answer for this catastrophic fall is … it is INTENTIONAL via either greed or agenda! If you have another explanation … Please share it with us …
We as a society are conditioned from birth to place total confidence and trust in certain individuals within said society. This is Readily apparent for those that would lead us, and those that tend to our health. Modern Doctors and healthcare providers are afforded unquestioned faith in their abilities and counsel, with an admiration that transcends logic … especially when considering my opening comments concerning the rapidly failing health of America.
Please consider just how blatantly the deck is stacked against we Americans. The modern mechanisms of health ruination are focused heavily on this society with Americans being the most exposed to:
GMOs
Bio-toxins
Environmental toxins
Harmful and addictive pharmaceutical drugs
Geoengineering fallout
Fluoridated water
Vaccines
Harmful (know cancer causing) food additives
… and that is the short list.
Each and every one of these mechanisms are by themselves a blight on our health … but the synergistic combination of many, or all of them simultaneously leads to catastrophic results … the results we are seeing today!
Yet even with the resulting massive rise in health disasters such as Autism, Dementia, Alzheimer disease, Diabetes, Autoimmune dysfunctions, Food Allergies, Cancer, infertility, etc… all of which we suffer at a higher rate (or soon to be) than any other industrialized nation on this planet … we see no massive push by our supposed leaders or health agencies to get to the root of this catastrophic trend. WHY?
VACCINES
By far the most concerning of these destructive mechanisms, due to its continuously conditioned (programmed) acceptance by this society, its erroneously fabled accomplishments, and promise of lifesaving capability, is Vaccines. Yet for anyone who has done any research into their lack of proven efficacy, their massive side effects, or their rising incidences of harm up to and including death, trying to understand why this society blindly allows their rapidly increasing proliferation is a huge red flag!
One example is the blatant statement from the CDC whereby they state that vaccines never have, never could and never will cause autism … except:
The most painful aspect of the massive damage caused by over a century of increased vaccine proliferation, is the fact that by far the most prolific and blatant anti-vaccine activists are … those who have lost a child, a loved one, or witnessed their vulnerable child triggered into a life of autism, or other life wrecking maladies, as a result of vaccines. And this accounts for MANY (and growing daily) anti-vaccine activists! The massive guilt and lasting pain a parent or loved one will suffer is the knowledge that …
“If they had only done just a little research … this catastrophe could have been prevented”.
So is there information available, information that can be accessed easily to mitigate these painful scenarios? Most will tell you when queried to “ask your doctor”, but the truth of the matter is these blindly trusted individuals are compromised by lack of knowledge, the greed of profit (kickbacks on vaccines), the lack of accountability, and the unwillingness to afford the time with each patient to cover all the possibilities or ramifications of vaccines (even if they were aware themselves).
An example of the blatant un-truths and intentionally applied ignorance you will receive from said doctors is … When asked by concerned parents prior to their infants being vaccinated “What are the chances of my child being harmed by these vaccines?” … The canned answer is “Less than one in a Million.” This is by far the most popular answer as if it comes straight from a med school text-book, and this is a blatant lie!
So …
Who can/do we trust to tell us what others wont … the “TRUTH”?
Who can/do we trust to provide us with the information we need to protect ourselves and our much more vulnerable children?
Who can/do we turn to when no one else will enlighten us as to the reality of Big Pharma’s near death grip on humanity?
Who can/do we trust when we are blatantly aware that our government (tasked with our good health) cannot be trusted, and in fact is complicit in most that harms us?
TLB has been partnered with Children’s Health Defense since before that was their name (used to be World Mercury Project) and we are proud to share their great work and information. This project is run by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and is a premier site for vaccine (and other topics like 5G) related information … factual information … that can be trusted and used to build a safe and responsible plan for protecting your health and that of your loved ones. RFK Jr. has taken this one step further by stepping forward to provide a weekly show that goes to great lengths to make sure you have the TRUTH!
Below are the premier and first three shows in this series. We strongly suggest you watch them and make the time weekly to watch future episodes … because knowing the TRUTH can in fact be a … Life Saver !!!
••••
‘Truth’ (Weekly Video Series) with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. – Episodes 1 – 4
EPISODE #1
In this first episode of our new weekly “TRUTH” series, Polly Tommey and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. kicked off the new CHD Channel on Peeps TV with a lively discussion on a wide range of relevant topics in the health freedom movement. RFK, Jr. shed light on conflict of interest in the development of vaccines, early red flags in the Moderna coronavirus vaccine trials, the new “Vaccine Czar”, pathogenic priming and much more.
EPISODE #2
In this episode of our weekly “TRUTH” series, RFK, Jr. spoke with Polly Tommey about the health epidemics of children, delving even deeper into the specific injuries caused by vaccinations, including those listed on the product inserts. Discussion surrounded the fact that there is essentially no safety testing for vaccines; and, once citizens know this information and do their research, they become steadfast advocates who can’t turn away. The episode closed with a discussion of rights to refuse vaccinations and that parents shouldn’t be bullied!
EPISODE #3
In this episode of our weekly “TRUTH” series, RFK, Jr. spoke with Polly Tommey about the health epidemics of children, flu vaccines, mRNA vaccines, media censorship and took questions from the viewers. (All episodes can also be found on the CHD Channel on Peeps TV, a network on Roku. Roku is accessible from any Smart TV and can be purchased separately for older TVs.)
EPISODE #4
In this episode of our weekly “TRUTH” series, RFK, Jr. spoke with Polly Tommey about the suffering of children and families in Africa and India caused by unsafe vaccines backed, distributed and promoted by Bill Gates. They also discuss the power Dr. Anthony Fauci has in steering the direction of research funded by taxpayers. (All episodes can be found on CHD’s website and social media, and on the CHD Channel found on Peeps TV, a network on Roku. Roku is accessible from any Smart TV and can be purchased separately for older TVs.)
••••
The above 4 videos and their preface originated on Children’s Health Defense and is re-published here by contribution with attribution to ChildrensHealthDefense.org.
••••
Parting Shot …
••••
TLB Editors Note: This is World Mercury Project on steroids! TLB highly recommends you click on the image below, visit this great website, and do whatever you can to help see this vital forum succeed … for the sake of our children !!! Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.