thelibertybeacon--2020-06-24--There’s a Huge Difference in Someone Dying “Of” Covid & “With” Covid …

Louis Pasteur ( 1822 – 1895 ) was a French chemist and microbiologist born in Dole .
He is best known for his remarkable breakthroughs in the causes and prevention of disease .
His experiments supported the germ theory of disease .
In essence , Pasteur taught that disease came from outside the body in the form of bacteria .
For Pasteur , to fight illness is to treat the symptoms with a vaccination .
This approach has shaped modern medicine and pharmacology .
The two most celebrated achievements in Pasteur ’ s career : 1 ) His bold public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sheep at Poully-le-Fort in 1881 .
2 ) The first known application of his rabies vaccine to a human subject , young Joseph Meister , in July 1885 .
In the first case , Pasteur deliberately deceived the public and the scientific community about the nature of the vaccine used in the experiments at Poully-le-Fort .
In the second case , the nature of Pasteur ’ s deception is less clear-cut , but here too I find some striking discrepancies between the public and private versions of the famous story of Joseph Meister @ @ @ @ @ @ @ starting work on rabies , Pasteur and his colleagues had developed a live viral preparation , which , Pasteur claimed , not only protected dogs from rabies infections , but prevented the disease from becoming symptomatic if administered post exposure .
Still , it was not without reluctance—or concern from his peers—that he agreed to administer a series of viral injections to the asymptomatic young Meister .
“ This will be another bad night for your father , ” wrote Pasteur ’ s wife Marie to their children during the treatment .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the idea of applying a measure of last resort to this child.
” But it seemed to work—Meister didn ’ t develop rabies .
And after starting treatment of another boy that October , Pasteur declared the vaccine a success before the French National Academy of Medicine .
The story became international news ; even patients from America were soon shipped over to Europe to receive the miracle cure .
Pasteur ’ s secretive attitude further fueled his opponents .
His papers were only three or four pages long .
There were no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reproduce to prove the efficacy of the vaccine .
Nearly a century later , in the 1970s , Pasteur ’ s laboratory notes ( in the possession of his heirs until then ) were made public .
They revealed startling discrepancies between Pasteur ’ s research and his claims : although he had tested a vaccine on dogs , the concoction administered to Meister was made using different methods , essentially untested in animals .
Its seeming success was the result of an educated guess and proved , just like today , that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that showed that you can cure disease with disease or vaccinations .
This would qualify as a definition of insanity and reveals the dark sinister side of Louis Pasteur and the vaccine fraud that has been going on for over 130 years .
For over a century now , the focus in health and medicine has been almost 100 % targeting on treating symptoms rather than prevention and the treatment for underlying causes .
With this mindset , millions of people will happily smoke , overeat , drink alcohol , not exercise , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ utterly acidic and destructive lifestyle in the knowledge that there is probably a fairy tale drug or a vaccine out there if anything really goes wrong .
Pierre Jacques Antoine BéChamp ( 1816 – 1908 ) was a French medical doctor , biologist , contemporary of Louis Pasteur .
He believed that a completely healthy internal fluid environment would be immune to harmful bacteria and that only when the body became a welcome host for this bacteria .
( i.e .
when our cells become weak from an acidic lifestyle or toxic internal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Us and From Us We do NOT ‘ CATCH ’ sickness or disease we ‘ DO ’ sickness and disease with how we live , where we live , what we eat , what we drink , what we breathe , what we think , what we feel and what we believe .
Some people are offended with this statement and the contextual or internal environmental theory because it shifts responsibility to the person who is tired , sick , obese , or cancerous , rather than using ones self-inflicted dis-eases as an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ non-existent phantom germ or virus like , HIV , Ebola , Hantavirus , Zika virus , SARS COVID-2 , SARS COVID-19 , Polio , etc .
for their pain and suffering .
Bottom line is most if not all sicknesses and diseases are the consequence of personal choices that leads to the over-acidification of the interstitial fluids of the Interstitium organ ( the largest organ of the body ) .
The interstitial fluids surround every cell that makes up every gland , organ and tissue .
The interstitial fluids are the dumping ground @ @ @ @ @ @ @ waste of the intracellular and intravascular fluids .
It is the primary purpose of the Interstitium organ to remove these acidic wastes out through the lymphatic system .
If this does not happen on a daily basis toxins can build up causing decompensated acidosis and the genesis for all sickness and disease .
We All Have Viruses , All The Time , as Part of our Virome and Immune System The humble virus is deeply misunderstood .
The human body is composed of an estimated 6 trillion cells , 60 trillion bacteria and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have a microbiome of friendly bacteria which forms the basis of our immune system and 2nd brain in our gut , so too do we have a virome ( a collection and community of viruses ) which play a role in our healing .
Through the ascendency of germ theory over host theory/terrain theory , the mainstream paradigm now teaches that viruses are “ bad guys ” , infectious agents “ out there ” , who can invade the body – thus reinforcing the need for Big Pharma drugs and vaccines .
Viruses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bodies produce .
They are not infectious agents .
The exosome theory states that if cells are poisoned , they produce viruses ( secretions ) to clean up the toxins .
This is what the plant kingdom does ; when a tree has a beetle infestation , it makes a hormonal secretion to tell other trees to defend themselves .
Thus , Operation Coronavirus is not only a fake pandemic , but also a colossal and unprecedented worldwide psyop , based on exploiting our ignorance over the true nature of viruses .
Insiders @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the article “ Insider Exposes COVID-19 Coronavirus Scam ” have revealed how there are coronavirus test kits being distributed which don ’ t even test for the specific SARS-CoV2 strain !
They just test for generic coronavirus ( coronavirus is defined as the “ common cold ” in medical encyclopedias ) which of course will produce more false positive ( as the NWO agenda dictates ) .
Meanwhile , the Medical Industry relies on the PCR test which I have exposed in other articles as wholly inadequate .
The PCR Test is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ actually isolate the virus .
The founder of the PCR test Kary Mullis admitted that you can ’ t use PCR to prove infectious etiology or to diagnose an infectious disease .
Besides , you can manipulate the results PCR will yield by choosing how many cycles ( amplifications ) to run .
For some diseases , if you lower the number of cycles to 35 , it can make everyone appear negative , while if you increase them to above 35 , it can make everyone appear positive .
The COVID-19 umbrella @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unscientific , manipulative and deceptive way to justify this manufactured coronavirus crisis , which the evidence shows is a fake pandemic .
The international lockdown which covers around 100 nations and at least 20 % of the world right now is based upon the idea that there is a new distinct virus SARS-CoV2 which is spreading , infecting and causing the disease COVID-19 .
However , there are many key foundational questions which can not be adequately answered .
The most important of these is that the virus itself has never been isolated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disease ( or more accurately diseases ) that people have !
This is in addition to the obvious manipulation of the figures with false positives and other sleights of hand such as inflating the numbers by counting anyone who merely had the virus as “ dead from ” the virus .
The coronavirus fails Koch ’ s postulates .
The Emperor has no clothes – and all the power grabs and emergency decrees for lockdowns are based on lies .
We are not looking at 1 virus , 1 cause and 1 disease @ @ @ @ @ @ @ diseases and a variety of causes , hidden by the COVID-19 umbrella term to fuel the fake pandemic narrative .
German scientist Robert Koch ( Heinrich Hermann Robert Koch , 1843-1910 ) made great contributions to the field of microbiology .
He is considered to be one of the founders of the field of modern bacteriology .
He identified the specific causative agents of TB ( tuberculosis ) , cholera and anthrax .
For his work on TB , he was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1905 in Physiology or Medicine .
Koch @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agent of a particular disease .
These criteria have become a gold standard for determining the existence of an infectious agent and for isolating and verifiying what is causing a disease .
The criteria are a set of conditions known as Koch ’ s postulates .
They are : 1 .
The microorganism must be identified in all individuals affected by the disease , but not in healthy individuals .
2 .
The microorganism can be isolated from the diseased individual and grown in culture .
3 .
When introduced into a healthy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disease .
4 .
The microorganism must then be re-isolated from the experimental host , and found to be identical to the original microorganism .
Firstly , the coronavirus SARS-CoV2 ( allegedly causing the disease COVID-19 ) has not been shown to be present only in sick people and not in healthy ones .
There are countless cases of people having this virus with mild , minor or zero symptoms .
Recently Iceland tested a relatively large percentage of its population ( around 5,000 people out of 364,000 ) and found that 0.86 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Icelanders had the coronavirus .
The symptoms ?
Little or none : Secondly , the virus has never been isolated – which must be done with proper equipment such as electron microscopes and which can not be achieved through CT scans ( as the Chinese were using ) and the flawed PCR test ( more on this below ) .
The January 24th 2020 study published in the New England Journal of Medicine entitled A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China , 2019 describes how the scientists arrived at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fluid samples and extracted RNA from them using the PCR test .
It admits that the coronavirus failed Koch ’ s postulates : Now let ’ s talk about the Nasal Swab PCR test they use to determine if someone had Covid : Kary Mullis , the inventor of the RT-PCR ( Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction ) test , or PCR test for short , explained why the PCR test is not especially diagnostic , for Covid , HIV , or for anything else : The PCR test is qualitative not quantitative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but it can not measure or determine viral load or the quantity of a virus needed to prove it is causing a particular disease .
The PCR tests for genetic sequence .
It can not prove causation .
The PCR test is unreliable as the results can be manipulated due to the arbitrary number of amplifications/cycles chosen .
In theory , the tester can show whatever result they want it to show based on the choice of cycles .
The CDC ( US Center for Disease Control ) itself admits that a positive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ method ) doesn ’ t mean the virus is causing the disease/symptoms you may have !
These are the actual words of the CDC ?
In essence , the PCR test can not confirm that ANYONE tested positive for COVID 19 or determine that it was the cause of death in the first place .
There ’ s a huge difference in someone dying “ of ” Covid and “ with ” Covid .
Just because you have some genetic material from a sick person doesn ’ t mean it is pathogenic… especially @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people .
That ’ s like saying we identified the spare tire as the cause of the fatal accident because we found them in both cars .

There’s a Huge Difference in Someone Dying “Of” Covid & “With” Covid …
By TLB Staff Writer: Dan Asmussen
On his deathbed Louis Pasteur said “Bernard was correct. I was wrong. The microbe (germ) is nothing. The terrain (milieu) is everything.”
Louis Pasteur (1822 – 1895) was a French chemist and microbiologist born in Dole. He is best known for his remarkable breakthroughs in the causes and prevention of disease. His experiments supported the germ theory of disease. In essence, Pasteur taught that disease came from outside the body in the form of bacteria. For Pasteur, to fight illness is to treat the symptoms with a vaccination. This approach has shaped modern medicine and pharmacology.
The two most celebrated achievements in Pasteur’s career:
1) His bold public demonstration of a vaccine against anthrax in sheep at Poully-le-Fort in 1881.
2) The first known application of his rabies vaccine to a human subject, young Joseph Meister, in July 1885.
In the first case, Pasteur deliberately deceived the public and the scientific community about the nature of the vaccine used in the experiments at Poully-le-Fort.
In the second case, the nature of Pasteur’s deception is less clear-cut, but here too I find some striking discrepancies between the public and private versions of the famous story of Joseph Meister.
By 1885, five years after starting work on rabies, Pasteur and his colleagues had developed a live viral preparation, which, Pasteur claimed, not only protected dogs from rabies infections, but prevented the disease from becoming symptomatic if administered post exposure.
Still, it was not without reluctance—or concern from his peers—that he agreed to administer a series of viral injections to the asymptomatic young Meister. “This will be another bad night for your father,” wrote Pasteur’s wife Marie to their children during the treatment. “He cannot come to terms with the idea of applying a measure of last resort to this child.”
But it seemed to work—Meister didn’t develop rabies. And after starting treatment of another boy that October, Pasteur declared the vaccine a success before the French National Academy of Medicine. The story became international news; even patients from America were soon shipped over to Europe to receive the miracle cure.
Pasteur’s secretive attitude further fueled his opponents. His papers were only three or four pages long. There were no details, and no way you could reproduce to prove the efficacy of the vaccine.
Nearly a century later, in the 1970s, Pasteur’s laboratory notes (in the possession of his heirs until then) were made public. They revealed startling discrepancies between Pasteur’s research and his claims: although he had tested a vaccine on dogs, the concoction administered to Meister was made using different methods, essentially untested in animals. Its seeming success was the result of an educated guess and proved, just like today, that there are NO scientific evidence or experiments that showed that you can cure disease with disease or vaccinations. This would qualify as a definition of insanity and reveals the dark sinister side of Louis Pasteur and the vaccine fraud that has been going on for over 130 years.
For over a century now, the focus in health and medicine has been almost 100% targeting on treating symptoms rather than prevention and the treatment for underlying causes. With this mindset, millions of people will happily smoke, overeat, drink alcohol, not exercise, get flu vaccine shots and lead an utterly acidic and destructive lifestyle in the knowledge that there is probably a fairy tale drug or a vaccine out there if anything really goes wrong.
Pierre Jacques Antoine BéChamp (1816 – 1908) was a French medical doctor, biologist, contemporary of Louis Pasteur. He believed that a completely healthy internal fluid environment would be immune to harmful bacteria and that only when the body became a welcome host for this bacteria. (i.e. when our cells become weak from an acidic lifestyle or toxic internal fluid environment)
Disease is Born In Us and From Us
We do NOT ‘CATCH’ sickness or disease we ‘DO’ sickness and disease with how we live, where we live, what we eat, what we drink, what we breathe, what we think, what we feel and what we believe. Some people are offended with this statement and the contextual or internal environmental theory because it shifts responsibility to the person who is tired, sick, obese, or cancerous, rather than using ones self-inflicted dis-eases as an excuse to shift the blame on a non-existent phantom germ or virus like, HIV, Ebola, Hantavirus, Zika virus, SARS COVID-2, SARS COVID-19, Polio, etc. for their pain and suffering.
Bottom line is most if not all sicknesses and diseases are the consequence of personal choices that leads to the over-acidification of the interstitial fluids of the Interstitium organ (the largest organ of the body). The interstitial fluids surround every cell that makes up every gland, organ and tissue. The interstitial fluids are the dumping ground for acidic metabolic, dietary and respiratory waste of the intracellular and intravascular fluids. It is the primary purpose of the Interstitium organ to remove these acidic wastes out through the lymphatic system. If this does not happen on a daily basis toxins can build up causing decompensated acidosis and the genesis for all sickness and disease.
We All Have Viruses, All The Time, as Part of our Virome and Immune System
The humble virus is deeply misunderstood. The human body is composed of an estimated 6 trillion cells, 60 trillion bacteria and 380 trillion viruses. Just as we have a microbiome of friendly bacteria which forms the basis of our immune system and 2nd brain in our gut, so too do we have a virome (a collection and community of viruses) which play a role in our healing. Through the ascendency of germ theory over host theory/terrain theory, the mainstream paradigm now teaches that viruses are “bad guys”, infectious agents “out there”, who can invade the body – thus reinforcing the need for Big Pharma drugs and vaccines.
Viruses come from exosomes or tiny particles our bodies produce. They are not infectious agents. The exosome theory states that if cells are poisoned, they produce viruses (secretions) to clean up the toxins. This is what the plant kingdom does; when a tree has a beetle infestation, it makes a hormonal secretion to tell other trees to defend themselves.
Thus, Operation Coronavirus is not only a fake pandemic, but also a colossal and unprecedented worldwide psyop, based on exploiting our ignorance over the true nature of viruses.
Fake Tests for a Fake Pandemic
Insiders and whistleblowers such as the one in the article “Insider Exposes COVID-19 Coronavirus Scam” have revealed how there are coronavirus test kits being distributed which don’t even test for the specific SARS-CoV2 strain! They just test for generic coronavirus (coronavirus is defined as the “common cold” in medical encyclopedias) which of course will produce more false positive (as the NWO agenda dictates).
Meanwhile, the Medical Industry relies on the PCR test which I have exposed in other articles as wholly inadequate. The PCR Test is a surrogate test since it doesn’t actually isolate the virus. The founder of the PCR test Kary Mullis admitted that you can’t use PCR to prove infectious etiology or to diagnose an infectious disease. Besides, you can manipulate the results PCR will yield by choosing how many cycles (amplifications) to run. For some diseases, if you lower the number of cycles to 35, it can make everyone appear negative, while if you increase them to above 35, it can make everyone appear positive.
The COVID-19 umbrella term has been used in an absolutely unscientific, manipulative and deceptive way to justify this manufactured coronavirus crisis, which the evidence shows is a fake pandemic. The international lockdown which covers around 100 nations and at least 20% of the world right now is based upon the idea that there is a new distinct virus SARS-CoV2 which is spreading, infecting and causing the disease COVID-19. However, there are many key foundational questions which cannot be adequately answered.
The most important of these is that the virus itself has never been isolated nor thoroughly proven to be causing the disease (or more accurately diseases) that people have! This is in addition to the obvious manipulation of the figures with false positives and other sleights of hand such as inflating the numbers by counting anyone who merely had the virus as “dead from” the virus.
The coronavirus fails Koch’s postulates. The Emperor has no clothes – and all the power grabs and emergency decrees for lockdowns are based on lies. We are not looking at 1 virus, 1 cause and 1 disease; we are looking a cluster of diseases and a variety of causes, hidden by the COVID-19 umbrella term to fuel the fake pandemic narrative.
German scientist Robert Koch (Heinrich Hermann Robert Koch, 1843-1910) made great contributions to the field of microbiology. He is considered to be one of the founders of the field of modern bacteriology. He identified the specific causative agents of TB (tuberculosis), cholera and anthrax. For his work on TB, he was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1905 in Physiology or Medicine. Koch established 4 criteria to identify the causative agent of a particular disease. These criteria have become a gold standard for determining the existence of an infectious agent and for isolating and verifiying what is causing a disease. The criteria are a set of conditions known as Koch’s postulates. They are:
1. The microorganism must be identified in all individuals affected by the disease, but not in healthy individuals.
2. The microorganism can be isolated from the diseased individual and grown in culture.
3. When introduced into a healthy individual, the cultured microorganism must cause disease.
4. The microorganism must then be re-isolated from the experimental host, and found to be identical to the original microorganism.
Firstly, the coronavirus SARS-CoV2 (allegedly causing the disease COVID-19) has not been shown to be present only in sick people and not in healthy ones. There are countless cases of people having this virus with mild, minor or zero symptoms. Recently Iceland tested a relatively large percentage of its population (around 5,000 people out of 364,000) and found that 0.86% (close to 1%) of Icelanders had the coronavirus. The symptoms? Little or none:
“Importantly, approximately half of the people who tested positive for COVID-19 are non-symptomatic, according to Gudnason as reported by BuzzFeed. The other half is mostly showing “very moderate cold-like symptoms.””
Secondly, the virus has never been isolated – which must be done with proper equipment such as electron microscopes and which cannot be achieved through CT scans (as the Chinese were using) and the flawed PCR test (more on this below). The January 24th 2020 study published in the New England Journal of Medicine entitled A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019 describes how the scientists arrived at the idea of COVID-19: they took lung fluid samples and extracted RNA from them using the PCR test. It admits that the coronavirus failed Koch’s postulates:
“Further development of accurate and rapid methods to identify unknown respiratory pathogens is still needed … our study does not fulfill Koch’s postulates.”
Now let’s talk about the Nasal Swab PCR test they use to determine if someone had Covid:
Kary Mullis, the inventor of the RT-PCR (Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction) test, or PCR test for short, explained why the PCR test is not especially diagnostic, for Covid, HIV, or for anything else:
“Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron. PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral-load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to Covid, HIV, etc… The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.”
The PCR test is qualitative not quantitative. It can isolate a genetic sequence but it cannot measure or determine viral load or the quantity of a virus needed to prove it is causing a particular disease.
The PCR tests for genetic sequence. It cannot prove causation.
The PCR test is unreliable as the results can be manipulated due to the arbitrary number of amplifications/cycles chosen. In theory, the tester can show whatever result they want it to show based on the choice of cycles.
The CDC (US Center for Disease Control) itself admits that a positive coronavirus COVID-19 test (using the PCR method) doesn’t mean the virus is causing the disease/symptoms you may have! These are the actual words of the CDC ?
“Positive [test] results are indicative of active infection with 2019-nCoV but do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.”
In essence, the PCR test cannot confirm that ANYONE tested positive for COVID 19 or determine that it was the cause of death in the first place. There’s a huge difference in someone dying “of” Covid and “with” Covid.
Just because you have some genetic material from a sick person doesn’t mean it is pathogenic… especially when you can find it in healthy people. That’s like saying we identified the spare tire as the cause of the fatal accident because we found them in both cars.


thelibertybeacon--2020-06-24--Psycho-pharmacy feeds on Lockdown woes of C-19

There can be no doubt that restrictions placed on personal liberties over the last few months will have taken their toll .
The natural fears that have gone hand-in-hand with unprecedented circumstances may have led to mental difficulties for some people .
A helping hand or a listening ear may be just the tonic to get those people back up and running .
Psychiatrists however see it differently .
They have been promoting the idea of an increase in the number of referrals to mental health services .
This has resulted in a move by the pharmaceutical industry to capitalise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ At least two antidepressant drugs are being tested to supposedly ease the symptoms of COVID-19 .
There ’ s no humanity or altruism connected with this dubious practice .
It ’ s a brazen attempt to generate business through the practice of “ repurposing ” existing drugs for new indications , an enterprise that would create huge profits if the altered use for COVID-19 was approved .
There ’ s also the day-to-day cost of psychiatric drugs .
The price of one commonly prescribed antidepressant in the UK called Sertraline has hit new @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has increased more than 800 per cent during recent times , an elevated price that taxpayers will be expected to cover .
While the highly-inflated cost grabs media attention , it ’ s vital that the side effects of this drug category are in full view .
Spin doctors work overtime to play these down , but when the side effects include suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviour , the spin doctor needs to be really good to play down the potential of fatalities while convincing members of the public to keep taking the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the drugs outweigh the risks .
If side effects include feeling emotionally numb and suicidal , it ’ s hard to see how that could be the case .
When seeing the inflated price of the drug , it would be more accurate to say that profits outweigh the risks .
Mind-altering psychiatric drugs produce nullifying effects on people which are then hailed as being ‘ demonstrably effective.
’ The person witnessing these effects thinks the drugs are ’ working ’ when in fact , all that ’ s happened is the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exhibiting the effects of a dangerous mind-altering foreign substance in his or her body .
The willingness and dedication to expose the damaging effects linked to psychiatric ‘ treatments ’ is aligned with the idea that honesty is the best policy .
The current psychiatric operating basis however is far from honest .
If you ever find yourself in a position where you are offered a psychiatric drug on any pretext , you have a right to be fully informed before you give your consent .
Knowing the real truth about psychiatric drugs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trickery is in your very best interests .
So arm yourself with knowledge.With that in mind our international organisation has made it as easy as possible for you to look up the side effects of any psychiatric drug and check its potential for harm before you take it .
You can use the Psychiatric drugs side effects search engine any time you need .
Brian Daniels is the Executive Director of The Citizens Commission on Human Rights ( CCHR ) in the UK Please visit CCHR UK now to find out more and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is from UK Reloaded The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Mental health watchdog issues warning as Psycho-pharmacy feeds on Lockdown woes & COVID19 fears
“Repurposing” dangerous psychiatric meds to “ease symptoms” of COVID19 is a cynical marketing ploy
by Brian Daniels
There can be no doubt that restrictions placed on personal liberties over the last few months will have taken their toll. The natural fears that have gone hand-in-hand with unprecedented circumstances may have led to mental difficulties for some people.
A helping hand or a listening ear may be just the tonic to get those people back up and running. Psychiatrists however see it differently. They have been promoting the idea of an increase in the number of referrals to mental health services. This has resulted in a move by the pharmaceutical industry to capitalise on the human concerns and misery.
At least two antidepressant drugs are being tested to supposedly ease the symptoms of COVID-19. There’s no humanity or altruism connected with this dubious practice. It’s a brazen attempt to generate business through the practice of “repurposing” existing drugs for new indications, an enterprise that would create huge profits if the altered use for COVID-19 was approved.
There’s also the day-to-day cost of psychiatric drugs. The price of one commonly prescribed antidepressant in the UK called Sertraline has hit new heights. The cost of the drug has increased more than 800 per cent during recent times, an elevated price that taxpayers will be expected to cover.
While the highly-inflated cost grabs media attention, it’s vital that the side effects of this drug category are in full view. Spin doctors work overtime to play these down, but when the side effects include suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviour, the spin doctor needs to be really good to play down the potential of fatalities while convincing members of the public to keep taking the pills.
Psychiatrists openly claim that benefits of the drugs outweigh the risks. If side effects include feeling emotionally numb and suicidal, it’s hard to see how that could be the case. When seeing the inflated price of the drug, it would be more accurate to say that profits outweigh the risks.
Mind-altering psychiatric drugs produce nullifying effects on people which are then hailed as being ‘demonstrably effective.’ The person witnessing these effects thinks the drugs are ’working’ when in fact, all that’s happened is the person has been drugged, and is exhibiting the effects of a dangerous mind-altering foreign substance in his or her body.
The willingness and dedication to expose the damaging effects linked to psychiatric ‘treatments’ is aligned with the idea that honesty is the best policy. The current psychiatric operating basis however is far from honest.
If you ever find yourself in a position where you are offered a psychiatric drug on any pretext, you have a right to be fully informed before you give your consent.
Knowing the real truth about psychiatric drugs and being able to see through such trickery is in your very best interests. So arm yourself with knowledge.With that in mind our international organisation has made it as easy as possible for you to look up the side effects of any psychiatric drug and check its potential for harm before you take it. You can use the Psychiatric drugs side effects search engine any time you need.
Brian Daniels is the Executive Director of The Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR) in the UK
CCHR works tirelessly to expose psychiatry’s criminal fakery. fraud and human rights abuses.
Please visit CCHR UK now to find out more and give them your support
The above feature is from UK Reloaded
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-06-25--Intimidation & Suppression of Inconvenient Knowledge

These comments follow on the disappointing failure of Prof Kaye ‘ UN Special Rapporteur for the Promotion and Protection of Freedom of Opinion and Freedom of Expression ’ to respond to two respectful letters complaining about the arbitrary use of terms like “ misinformation ” and “ disinformation ” for information which is likely just inconvenient for corporate global interests , global agencies and the policies of governments .
I also protested at the use the of term “ anti-vaccinationist ” as catch-all hate speech for anyone who criticises vaccine products , programs or the lobby .
I was moved @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seemed to be displaying signs of intellectual fastidiousness last year when he asked Mark Zuckerberg to be more precise about how he defined “ vaccine misinformation ” .
In my second letter I expanded this to include public and expert concern about 5G radiation – also coming to be classified expediently as “ misinformation ” , as with a recent communique by the Council of Europe ( which I understand to be the committee of the 27 heads of government of the European Union ) .
I wrote , it will be recalled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was genuinely surprised when he did not reply to me the first time , and that a United Nations office did not even have the courtesy to provide an acknowledgment , even when repeatedly requested .
It should also be obvious that this is just the sort of sensitive issue which his office should be attending to : even if Kaye thinks I am absolutely wrong it ought to be within his grasp to explain why .
The idea that there are increasing areas where governments should never have to be called to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In the absence of a reply I went to Kaye ’ s 2019 book ‘ Secret Police : The Global Struggle to Govern the Internet ’ for illumination .
The critical passage is found on page 91 where he writes favourably of the work of the Oxford Internet Institute ( OII ) : It is interesting to note here how once legitimate subjects of free speech have now fallen under the heading of “ manipulation ” .
In particular , he mentions OII ’ s Samantha Bradshaw , with whom I took issue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Culture , Media & Sports Committee Inquiry into FAKE News in 2017-18 .
I wrote to the Committee following her evidence : So where does it all come from ?
It turns out that the Institute ’ s founder is Dame Stephanie Shirley , also founder of Autism Speaks UK ( renamed Autistica ) which has been so obstructive in researching the causes of autism , and involved in covering up the rise .
A recent Project of OII ‘ Alternative News Networks – Understanding the spread and influence of disinformation , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the UK online information ecosystem ’ discloses three sources of funding : the Omidyar Network , the British Government and the Oxford Martin School .
About the Omidyar Network I know little , that the British government long ago abandoned anything but the merest lip-service to freedom of speech is evident , while the Oxford Martin School is a promoter of vaccines and vaccine compliance , with such luminaries as Andrew Pollard , among many other things director of Oxford Vaccine Group , and Alberto Giubilini , a philosopher who advocates for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ programme , ‘ Collective Responsibility for Infectious Diseases ’ .
Recently , when I and others took Giubilini to task over vaccine safety he sat by while a web troll graffitied the conversation and made it unintelligible ( rather like the sheep chanting “ Four legs good , two legs bad ” in Orwell ’ s ‘ Animal Farm ’ ’ ) .
Along with Bradshaw , Kaye also mentions Prof Philip Howard , director of OII and the Oxford Martin School program ‘ Science , Misinformation and the Media ’ .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a dangerous circle .
When OII complain to a parliamentary committee about the social media “ undermining research ” it not only sounds like a sinister appeal to authority it is also the research of an associate body which is much at issue .
Why – if it is any good – can not “ research ” withstand the scrutiny of social media ?
‘ Freedom of opinion and expression ’ David Kaye ?
I don ’ t think so somehow .
Secret police , maybe .
The above article is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ UK Editor , Age of Autism The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

Intimidation and Suppression of Inconvenient Knowledge
By: John Stone
These comments follow on the disappointing failure of Prof Kaye ‘UN Special Rapporteur for the Promotion and Protection of Freedom of Opinion and Freedom of Expression’ to respond to two respectful letters complaining about the arbitrary use of terms like “misinformation” and “disinformation” for information which is likely just inconvenient for corporate global interests, global agencies and the policies of governments. I also protested at the use the of term “anti-vaccinationist” as catch-all hate speech for anyone who criticises vaccine products, programs or the lobby.
I was moved to write to Prof Kaye because he seemed to be displaying signs of intellectual fastidiousness last year when he asked Mark Zuckerberg to be more precise about how he defined “vaccine misinformation”. In my second letter I expanded this to include public and expert concern about 5G radiation – also coming to be classified expediently as “misinformation”, as with a recent communique by the Council of Europe (which I understand to be the committee of the 27 heads of government of the European Union). I wrote, it will be recalled:
“It seems now that at “warp-speed” global citizens are having their rights to discuss their future stripped away from them by politicians using Orwellian strategies. Now, every time that global corporate interests are called into question, governments only have to wheel out terms like “misinformation” or “disinformation” and they are safe from public scrutiny or accountability. This bodes ill both for democracy and the safety of citizens.“
It may be said that I was genuinely surprised when he did not reply to me the first time, and that a United Nations office did not even have the courtesy to provide an acknowledgment, even when repeatedly requested. It should also be obvious that this is just the sort of sensitive issue which his office should be attending to: even if Kaye thinks I am absolutely wrong it ought to be within his grasp to explain why. The idea that there are increasing areas where governments should never have to be called to account is both absurd and menacing.
In the absence of a reply I went to Kaye’s 2019 book ‘Secret Police: The Global Struggle to Govern the Internet’ for illumination. The critical passage is found on page 91 where he writes favourably of the work of the Oxford Internet Institute (OII):
“OII has shown how all sorts of actors try to manipulate public opinion, from whether to vaccinate your children to whom to vote for in contested elections”
It is interesting to note here how once legitimate subjects of free speech have now fallen under the heading of “manipulation”. In particular, he mentions OII’s Samantha Bradshaw, with whom I took issue at the House of Commons’ Digital, Culture, Media & Sports Committee Inquiry into FAKE News in 2017-18. I wrote to the Committee following her evidence:
“In the light of all of this I was dismayed to see the comments of Samantha Bradshaw of the Oxford Internet Institute in the first oral hearing of the inquiry… talking about “undermining research” as an issue under consideration including prejudicial talk about “anti-vax campaigns” as if governments have a monopoly on truth: there may in fact be an awful lot wrong with government science which ought to be talked about. You cannot have an a priori view on that and believe seriously in freedom of speech.”
So where does it all come from? It turns out that the Institute’s founder is Dame Stephanie Shirley, also founder of Autism Speaks UK (renamed Autistica) which has been so obstructive in researching the causes of autism, and involved in covering up the rise.
A recent Project of OII ‘Alternative News Networks – Understanding the spread and influence of disinformation, propaganda, and divisive political news content in the UK online information ecosystem’ discloses three sources of funding: the Omidyar Network, the British Government and the Oxford Martin School. About the Omidyar Network I know little, that the British government long ago abandoned anything but the merest lip-service to freedom of speech is evident, while the Oxford Martin School is a promoter of vaccines and vaccine compliance, with such luminaries as Andrew Pollard, among many other things director of Oxford Vaccine Group, and Alberto Giubilini, a philosopher who advocates for vaccine compulsion, and works on their programme, ‘Collective Responsibility for Infectious Diseases’. Recently, when I and others took Giubilini to task over vaccine safety he sat by while a web troll graffitied the conversation and made it unintelligible (rather like the sheep chanting “Four legs good, two legs bad” in Orwell’s ‘Animal Farm’’). Along with Bradshaw, Kaye also mentions Prof Philip Howard, director of OII and the Oxford Martin School program ‘Science, Misinformation and the Media’.
We are, let us face it, in a dangerous circle. When OII complain to a parliamentary committee about the social media “undermining research” it not only sounds like a sinister appeal to authority it is also the research of an associate body which is much at issue. Why – if it is any good – cannot “research” withstand the scrutiny of social media? ‘Freedom of opinion and expression’ David Kaye? I don’t think so somehow. Secret police, maybe.
••••
The above article is a CHD Guest Editorial by John Stone , UK Editor, Age of Autism
••••
TLB Editors Note: This is World Mercury Project on steroids! TLB highly recommends you click on the image below, visit this great website, and do whatever you can to help see this vital forum succeed … for the sake of our children !!! Please take the time to Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.
••••
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-06-25--“Covid-19 Has Turned Public Health into a Patient-Killing Experiment”

We also remind readers of a piece we published regarding care homes in France which showed the same neglect of the elderly .
The lawyer for the plaintiffs believes some systemic failure is at work .
See French care homes face manslaughter investigation : Victims ’ lawyer tells RT details of ‘ scandal amid epidemic ’ [ VIDEO ] .
See also this article which takes in Europe more broadly : Coronavirus : Elderly Europeans Targeted , Denied Treatment .
To that we must add the interview with Off-Guardian ‘ s own Rosemary Frei and James Corbett .
See How @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Care Homes Was Created on Purpose [ VIDEO ] .
Frei looks at how a New England Journal of Medicine article , for example , set new guidelines for care and treatment in March ( Canada and the UK followed suit in their own way , too ) according to which , all of a sudden , age became a criterion for denying care .
ER Editor : Off-Guardian ‘ s Catte Black invites us to consider the broader context of the treatment of the elderly and sick in relation to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shocking , unethical trials of hydroxychloroquine on patients who should never have received the treatment in the way it was done .
From the beginning of the SARS-COV-2/COVID19 pandemic rollout , there have been disturbing hints , rumours and even overt whistleblower claims of seemingly gross medical malpractice connected with the treatment and handling of allegedly infected people .
We have heard about mandatory Do Not Resuscitate orders issued for the elderly , cognitively challenged people , autistic people and even children with fairly minor congenital conditions .
We have heard of terrifyingly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only increase the numbers of covid19 ‘ deaths ’ , and of general levels of incompetence and poor practice that must have the same result .
And now we have evidence of three clinical trials which require patients to be given up to 4 times the normal dosage of hydroxychloroquine , with or without their consent .
In one of these studies over 25 % of patients died .
This has been unearthed by Dr. Meryl Nass MD , and is covered in detail over at her site and at the Alliance for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to exposing unethical practice in the medical community .
The three studies are : Solidarity , conducted by the World Health Organization , on 3,500 Covid-19 patients at 400 hospitals , across 35 countries .
As well as Hydroxychloroqine the trial included Remdesivir , Lopinavir with Ritonavir , Lopinavir with Ritonavir plus Interferon beta-1a .
Recovery , conducted in the UK , sponsored by the Wellcome Trust ( GlaxoSmithKline ) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the UK government .
1,542 patients took part , of whom 396 ( 25.7 % @ @ @ @ @ @ @ project that is now trialing hydroxychloroquine as a SARSCOV2 therapy .
Doses employed in all studies were way above normal therapeutic doses and could well have proved fatal , especially to the very frail and compromised people enrolled in the trial , many of whom were already on ventilators or other forms of assisted breathing .
In fact , to even be considered for the Remap trial a patient had to be “ close to death , either on a ventilator or in shock , on pressor medications.
” Neither was any allowance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ kidney or liver function , who might have increased difficulty in processing the drug .
Only actual liver failure was grounds for reducing the dose : Patient consent was not considered necessary : Ironically , the Solidarity hydroxychloroquine trial was suspended on May 25th following the Surgisphere report in The Lancet that claimed 35 % higher death rates in patients receiving Hydroxychloroquine , but which later turned out to be fraudulent , and indeed Nass suggests these medical trials are cynically sacrificing human subjects as part of the ongoing war against hydroxychloroquine in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ work or is unsafe : This is more than possible of course , but I also think we need to set these frankly murderous “ trials ” within the wider context mentioned above – the distribution of DNRs to healthy or mildly compromised people , the brutal system of almost deliberately induced and needless deaths described by the whistleblower nurses in the US , the deaths by ‘ accidental ’ neglect in care homes .
These are all beginning to add up to something very dark and very strange going on in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Whether this is deliberate policy or some dreadful perfect storm of institutionalised fear and chronic under-funding is hard to say .
But something truly grotesque and potentially evil is going on here , and we can ’ t afford to ignore it .

We also remind readers of a piece we published regarding care homes in France which showed the same neglect of the elderly. The lawyer for the plaintiffs believes some systemic failure is at work. See French care homes face manslaughter investigation: Victims’ lawyer tells RT details of ‘scandal amid epidemic’ [VIDEO] . See also this article which takes in Europe more broadly: Coronavirus: Elderly Europeans Targeted, Denied Treatment .
To that we must add the interview with Off-Guardian‘s own Rosemary Frei and James Corbett . See How the High ‘Covid’ Death Rate in Care Homes Was Created on Purpose [VIDEO] . Frei looks at how a New England Journal of Medicine article, for example, set new guidelines for care and treatment in March (Canada and the UK followed suit in their own way, too) according to which, all of a sudden, age became a criterion for denying care.
ER Editor: Off-Guardian‘s Catte Black invites us to consider the broader context of the treatment of the elderly and sick in relation to the covid crisis as she discusses below the shocking, unethical trials of hydroxychloroquine on patients who should never have received the treatment in the way it was done.
CATTE BLACK
From the beginning of the SARS-COV-2/COVID19 pandemic rollout, there have been disturbing hints, rumours and even overt whistleblower claims of seemingly gross medical malpractice connected with the treatment and handling of allegedly infected people.
We have heard about mandatory Do Not Resuscitate orders issued for the elderly, cognitively challenged people, autistic people and even children with fairly minor congenital conditions.
We have heard of terrifyingly inappropriate usage of invasive ventilation that can only increase the numbers of covid19 ‘deaths’, and of general levels of incompetence and poor practice that must have the same result.
And now we have evidence of three clinical trials which require patients to be given up to 4 times the normal dosage of hydroxychloroquine, with or without their consent. In one of these studies over 25% of patients died.
This has been unearthed by Dr. Meryl Nass MD, and is covered in detail over at her site and at the Alliance for Human Research Protection, a site dedicated to exposing unethical practice in the medical community.
The three studies are:
Solidarity, conducted by the World Health Organization, on 3,500 Covid-19 patients at 400 hospitals, across 35 countries. As well as Hydroxychloroqine the trial included Remdesivir, Lopinavir with Ritonavir, Lopinavir with Ritonavir plus Interferon beta-1a.
Recovery, conducted in the UK, sponsored by the Wellcome Trust (GlaxoSmithKline) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the UK government. 1,542 patients took part, of whom 396 (25.7%) died
Remap, an ongoing multi-national project that is now trialing hydroxychloroquine as a SARSCOV2 therapy.
Doses employed in all studies were way above normal therapeutic doses and could well have proved fatal, especially to the very frail and compromised people enrolled in the trial, many of whom were already on ventilators or other forms of assisted breathing. In fact, to even be considered for the Remap trial a patient had to be “close to death, either on a ventilator or in shock, on pressor medications.”
Neither was any allowance made in dosage for patients with poor kidney or liver function, who might have increased difficulty in processing the drug. Only actual liver failure was grounds for reducing the dose:
No dose adjustment is necessary for renal dysfunction or concomitant use of renal replacement therapy. Clinicians should consider a dose adjustment in the presence of liver failure; however, no dose adjustment is necessary for abnormal liver function tests in the absence of liver failure.
Patient consent was not considered necessary:
For patients who are not competent to consent, either prospective agreement or entry via waiver of consent or some form of deferred consent can be applied, as required by an appropriate ethical review body.”
Ironically, the Solidarity hydroxychloroquine trial was suspended on May 25th following the Surgisphere report in The Lancet that claimed 35% higher death rates in patients receiving Hydroxychloroquine, but which later turned out to be fraudulent, and indeed Nass suggests these medical trials are cynically sacrificing human subjects as part of the ongoing war against hydroxychloroquine in a bid to prove it does not work or is unsafe:
Why is public health being turned on its head? REMAP-Covid is the third major multicenter clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine to give toxic doses to Covid patients. Who or what is behind this concerted effort to maim or kill patients in order to kill any appearance of benefit from hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of Covid-19?
This is more than possible of course, but I also think we need to set these frankly murderous “trials” within the wider context mentioned above – the distribution of DNRs to healthy or mildly compromised people, the brutal system of almost deliberately induced and needless deaths described by the whistleblower nurses in the US, the deaths by ‘accidental’ neglect in care homes.
These are all beginning to add up to something very dark and very strange going on in the shadows, just beyond public scrutiny.
Whether this is deliberate policy or some dreadful perfect storm of institutionalised fear and chronic under-funding is hard to say. But something truly grotesque and potentially evil is going on here, and we can’t afford to ignore it.
************


thelibertybeacon--2020-06-25--WHO Scientists Caught On Camera Questioning Safety of Vaccines [VIDEO]

All the more shocking , then , to see one of these scientists , just days earlier , put out a promotional video on behalf of WHO essentially lying to the public on the alleged safety of vaccines .
The 9-minute video below , put together by Del Bigtree , is worth listening to for the way in which several doctors question many aspects of vaccines .
Damning is the comment that ‘ frontline ’ professionals , i.e .
family doctors & etc.
, are now questioning vaccines themselves and can not answer their patients ’ concerns because they ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ve had half a day on vaccines in their medical studies .
ER Editor : We ’ ve just come across the Health Freedom Idaho site , which we can recommend .
The date of this article is January 12 , 2020 , following as it does the WHO ’ s Global Vaccine Safety Summit in early December , 2019 .
Make sure you pass this along !
This shocking footage from inside The W.H.O .
Global Vaccine Safety Summit on December 2 and 3 , 2019 lamenting about the LACK OF VACCINE @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if these vaccines science leaders of the W.H.O .
are using the General Population as test samples .
World Health Organization ’ s Chief Scientist , Dr. Soumya Swaminathan , telling the world in a recorded advertisement sponsored by The World Health Organization that the public can rest assured that vaccines are perfectly safe .
( see video ) She states that the vaccine program has been “ robustly ” tested , perfectly monitored by medical authorities and their safety is assured .
FIVE days later , on December 3rd , 2019 ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ addresses the Global Vaccine Safety Summit in Geneva , Switzerland .
Here she tells a completely different story – here she tells the truth , not knowing it would go viral .
She states : “ we can not overemphasize the fact that we really don ’ t have very good vaccine safety monitoring systems ” .
At the same Vaccine Summit , it was admitted in-house by WHO doctors that there have been no vaccine safety trials in pregnant women at all , yet they are still strongly encouraging women to have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Larson , Director , Vaccine Confidence Project , stated at the same WHO Summit : And here ’ s the kicker – Professor Larson then states that much of what is ridiculed as anti-vaccine “ misinformation ” is not , in fact , misinformation at all .
It is true .
We have been officially told that vaccines are completely safe and effective , that the science is settled , and we , the public , can have absolute faith that the authorities are vigilant in monitoring vaccine safety .
Then we have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the speakers , representing the very top doctors and scientists around the world , were lamenting the lack of vaccine safety studies .
This should be exposed on every current affairs program , all news and media outlets .
But instead , we have silence .

All the more shocking, then, to see one of these scientists, just days earlier, put out a promotional video on behalf of WHO essentially lying to the public on the alleged safety of vaccines.
The 9-minute video below, put together by Del Bigtree , is worth listening to for the way in which several doctors question many aspects of vaccines . Damning is the comment that ‘frontline’ professionals, i.e. family doctors &etc., are now questioning vaccines themselves and cannot answer their patients’ concerns because they’re ‘lucky’ if they’ve had half a day on vaccines in their medical studies.
ER Editor: We’ve just come across the Health Freedom Idaho site, which we can recommend. The date of this article is January 12, 2020, following as it does the WHO’s Global Vaccine Safety Summit in early December, 2019. Make sure you pass this along!
This shocking footage from inside The W.H.O. Global Vaccine Safety Summit on December 2 and 3, 2019 lamenting about the LACK OF VACCINE SAFETY STUDIES. It certainly sounds as if these vaccines science leaders of the W.H.O. are using the General Population as test samples.
World Health Organization’s Chief Scientist, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, telling the world in a recorded advertisement sponsored by The World Health Organization that the public can rest assured that vaccines are perfectly safe. (see video) She states that the vaccine program has been “robustly” tested, perfectly monitored by medical authorities and their safety is assured.
FIVE days later, on December 3rd, 2019 (in the video above), she addresses the Global Vaccine Safety Summit in Geneva, Switzerland. Here she tells a completely different story – here she tells the truth, not knowing it would go viral.
She states: “we cannot overemphasize the fact that we really don’t have very good vaccine safety monitoring systems”.
Oh, what a difference 5 days makes!
At the same Vaccine Summit, it was admitted in-house by WHO doctors that there have been no vaccine safety trials in pregnant women at all, yet they are still strongly encouraging women to have multiple vaccines during pregnancy.
Professor Heidi Larson, Director, Vaccine Confidence Project, stated at the same WHO Summit:
‘doctors are lucky if they get a half-day on vaccine education in their entire medical course… we have a very wobbly health professional front-line (doctors) that is starting to question vaccines and the safety of vaccines. That’s a huge problem’. Listen carefully here 8:09
And here’s the kicker – Professor Larson then states that much of what is ridiculed as anti-vaccine “misinformation” is not, in fact, misinformation at all. It is true.
We have been officially told that vaccines are completely safe and effective, that the science is settled, and we, the public, can have absolute faith that the authorities are vigilant in monitoring vaccine safety.
Then we have the Global Vaccine Safety Summit where many of the speakers, representing the very top doctors and scientists around the world, were lamenting the lack of vaccine safety studies.
This should be exposed on every current affairs program, all news and media outlets. But instead, we have silence.
Science is NEVER settled!


thelibertybeacon--2020-06-25--Knife terror suspect links to psychiatry

The suspect in the Reading “ terror ” attack may have been drugged by psychiatrists .
It is now known that he had been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder ( PTSD ) , depression and an emotionally unstable personality disorder .
He was under the care of NHS mental health services at the time of the attack , and had an extensive history of involvement with mental health services .
The routine psychiatric handling for such conditions is to drug the person with dangerous mind-and mood-altering medications that can cause violent urges and loss of impulse control .
While the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ killings being a suspected terrorist incident , intelligence agencies and other sources have revealed that his falling into the clutches of the mental health industry is the significant factor .
The administration of mind-altering psychiatric medications is the common factor in virtually ALL such violent , mindless rampages across the world .
This has been proven and known for a very long time , yet it continues apace , resulting in death and misery for so many of its victims , whilst governments remain silent on the matter and take no action , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ psycho-pharmaceutical industry .
It is not yet clear why successive governments have been so determined to protect the psycho-pharmacy at the expense of the citizenry but financial ties or some sort of leverage such as blackmail seem the most likely reasons .
It is now so far beyond dispute that psychiatric drugs are behind violent rampages that : • psychiatry and its co-conspirators in the pharmaceutical corporations stand exposed as subversive operations sowing violence and death in the society with evident government approval .
• when violent rampages such as the incident in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ perpetrator are accessories to the crime and should be treated as such .
• by its inaction and its unwillingness to even investigate the glaring link between violent rampages and the psychiatric drugging of the perpetrator the government ministers willfully negligent in that regard are also accessories to the crime .
One wonders how many more people have to die before these subversives and sources of terror are brought to account .
The above feature is from UK Reloaded The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB ) Comment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ site , we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam , advertising , vulgarity , threats of violence , racism , or personal/abusive attacks on other users .
This also applies to trolling , the use of more than one alias , or just intentional mischief .
Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators .
Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning .
Disclaimer : TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ material available to our readers under the provisions of “ fair use ” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political , health , economic and social issues .
The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes .
If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “ fair use ” you must request permission from the copyright owner .

Knife terror suspect links to psychiatry
by Jon Davy
The suspect in the Reading “terror” attack may have been drugged by psychiatrists.
It is now known that he had been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression and an emotionally unstable personality disorder. He was under the care of NHS mental health services at the time of the attack, and had an extensive history of involvement with mental health services.
The routine psychiatric handling for such conditions is to drug the person with dangerous mind-and mood-altering medications that can cause violent urges and loss of impulse control.
While the media ran the red herring of the killings being a suspected terrorist incident, intelligence agencies and other sources have revealed that his falling into the clutches of the mental health industry is the significant factor.
The administration of mind-altering psychiatric medications is the common factor in virtually ALL such violent, mindless rampages across the world. This has been proven and known for a very long time, yet it continues apace, resulting in death and misery for so many of its victims, whilst governments remain silent on the matter and take no action, evidently in an effort to protect the psycho-pharmaceutical industry.
It is not yet clear why successive governments have been so determined to protect the psycho-pharmacy at the expense of the citizenry but financial ties or some sort of leverage such as blackmail seem the most likely reasons.
It is now so far beyond dispute that psychiatric drugs are behind violent rampages that:
psychiatry and its co-conspirators in the pharmaceutical corporations stand exposed as subversive operations sowing violence and death in the society with evident government approval.
when violent rampages such as the incident in Reading occur, those who drugged the perpetrator are accessories to the crime and should be treated as such.
by its inaction and its unwillingness to even investigate the glaring link between violent rampages and the psychiatric drugging of the perpetrator the government ministers willfully negligent in that regard are also accessories to the crime.
One wonders how many more people have to die before these subversives and sources of terror are brought to account.
The above feature is from UK Reloaded
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


thelibertybeacon--2020-06-25--The Marxists of BLM are gonna succeed in securing… a Second Term for Trump

All the riots , toppled statues and attacks on American history will not end in the Year Zero the protesters want .
It ’ s going to achieve precisely the opposite , as the silent majority of Americans will show in November .
The silent majority is one of the biggest X factors in American politics .
Possibly even the biggest .
Not all Americans are the type to shout everything from the high heavens , even though we have a reputation for being brash and loud .
Many of us would rather let our actions do the talking than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ less than 150 days away , the left needs to reconsider where it ’ s going and what it ’ s enabling .
And whether it wants the nation to dump Trump , as its supporters say they ’ re passionate about achieving .
The poll numbers are hardly surprising .
Biden tends to range anywhere from 42 to 56 , whereas Trump is anywhere from 37 to 48 percent , according to Five Thirty Eight.This is no different to how it was in 2016 , when the polls showed Hillary Clinton routinely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he won ( albeit with a smaller number of votes than Clinton secured ) , there was a lot of pondering about how exactly the polls got it wrong , and it all came down to the same conclusion : the silent majority .
That large swath of Americans who weren ’ t vocal about who they were going to vote for , but weren ’ t pleased with how the country was going and let their actions speak for themselves .
During the course of the past four years , the political @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from their loss in 2016 .
If anything , they ’ ve become even less .
CNN personality Don Lemon has even gone to bat for Antifa .
There are constant statements in the liberal press that there ’ s some sort of deep-seated racism that ’ s inherent to the United States .
So much so that the Pulitzer Prize honoring journalism and the arts went to The 1619 Project , a historically inaccurate and easily debunked piece about the history of slavery in the United States .
Then came the death @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the Black Lives Matter ( BLM ) movement has been working to enact a sort of Year Zero , targeting monuments across the country to deface or destroy them .
This , of course , comes after the mass riots agitated by Antifa that saw many cities in flames .
And then there ’ s the creation of the CHAZ/CHOP autonomous area in Seattle , which is reportedly about to be shut down by the mayor .
Where is the condemnation from the Joe Biden camp ?
Where is the condemnation from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their support for the police ?
Why aren ’ t any of them calling for BLM – an avowedly Marxist group , the aims of which include the overthrowing of capitalism – to stop encouraging this or for Antifa to be declared a terrorist group , or declaring how bad an idea an autonomous , police-free zone is ?
The answer ?
They ’ re nowhere .
In fact , Nancy Pelosi tried to place the murder of George Floyd at the feet of Republicans .
Here is what the left does not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these Marxist groups and their actions doesn ’ t go unnoticed .
There ’ s a reason Trump rallies sell out the way they do .
There ’ s a reason why he won in 2016 and could just as easily have a poll-defying victory again .
That reason is simple : Americans take notice of what ’ s around them and realize who ’ s in charge and who ’ s failing .
It ’ s been speculated that the 2016 election was an indictment of HIllary Clinton , but I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ think it was an indictment of the left in general .
During the Barack Obama presidency , “ flyover country ” was constantly demeaned as being racist and backwards .
With Hillary Clinton , it was no different , and people were sick of it .
Now , it ’ s gone far beyond that .
Not only are there groups that actually believe America is a deeply racist and oppressive nation ( the opposite of reality ) , but they want to destroy it and create something new .
If you look @ @ @ @ @ @ @ obvious that they can ’ t even plant a crop , let alone run a country .
The United States does not want a Year Zero .
Ours is a nation with a heritage most Americans are proud of , and we ’ re proud of the oppression we ’ ve defeated over the years .
Erasing that history only means we ’ d be doomed to repeat it .
As such , the polls are likely going to remain the same until the election .
At that point , the silence will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cord for Republicans , and we ’ ll have another 2016 on our hands .
All because the left would not stand up to the radicals who want to destroy the nation .
Japanese reporter goes to CHAZ to prove it ’ s peaceful , leaves within 15 min with BLACK EYE ( TLB ) published this Op-Ed from RT-USA News with our appreciation for this perspective .

All the riots, toppled statues and attacks on American history will not end in the Year Zero the protesters want. It’s going to achieve precisely the opposite, as the silent majority of Americans will show in November.
The silent majority is one of the biggest X factors in American politics. Possibly even the biggest. Not all Americans are the type to shout everything from the high heavens, even though we have a reputation for being brash and loud. Many of us would rather let our actions do the talking than our words.
With the presidential election less than 150 days away, the left needs to reconsider where it’s going and what it’s enabling. And whether it wants the nation to dump Trump, as its supporters say they’re passionate about achieving.
The poll numbers are hardly surprising. Biden tends to range anywhere from 42 to 56, whereas Trump is anywhere from 37 to 48 percent, according to Five Thirty Eight.This is no different to how it was in 2016, when the polls showed Hillary Clinton routinely holding double-digit leads over Trump.
After he won (albeit with a smaller number of votes than Clinton secured), there was a lot of pondering about how exactly the polls got it wrong, and it all came down to the same conclusion: the silent majority. That large swath of Americans who weren’t vocal about who they were going to vote for, but weren’t pleased with how the country was going and let their actions speak for themselves.
During the course of the past four years, the political left in America has learnt zero lessons from their loss in 2016. If anything, they’ve become even less. CNN personality Don Lemon has even gone to bat for Antifa.
There are constant statements in the liberal press that there’s some sort of deep-seated racism that’s inherent to the United States. So much so that the Pulitzer Prize honoring journalism and the arts went to The 1619 Project, a historically inaccurate and easily debunked piece about the history of slavery in the United States. Then came the death of George Floyd.
Since that moment, the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement has been working to enact a sort of Year Zero, targeting monuments across the country to deface or destroy them. This, of course, comes after the mass riots agitated by Antifa that saw many cities in flames. And then there’s the creation of the CHAZ/CHOP autonomous area in Seattle, which is reportedly about to be shut down by the mayor.
Where is the condemnation from the Joe Biden camp? Where is the condemnation from the left in general? Where is their support for the police? Why aren’t any of them calling for BLM – an avowedly Marxist group, the aims of which include the overthrowing of capitalism – to stop encouraging this or for Antifa to be declared a terrorist group, or declaring how bad an idea an autonomous, police-free zone is? The answer? They’re nowhere. In fact, Nancy Pelosi tried to place the murder of George Floyd at the feet of Republicans.
Here is what the left does not understand. Its unwillingness to call out these Marxist groups and their actions doesn’t go unnoticed. There’s a reason Trump rallies sell out the way they do. There’s a reason why he won in 2016 and could just as easily have a poll-defying victory again. That reason is simple: Americans take notice of what’s around them and realize who’s in charge and who’s failing.
It’s been speculated that the 2016 election was an indictment of HIllary Clinton, but I’m not sure I agree. I think it was an indictment of the left in general. During the Barack Obama presidency, “flyover country” was constantly demeaned as being racist and backwards. With Hillary Clinton, it was no different, and people were sick of it. Now, it’s gone far beyond that. Not only are there groups that actually believe America is a deeply racist and oppressive nation (the opposite of reality), but they want to destroy it and create something new. If you look at CHAZ/CHOP, it’s rather obvious that they can’t even plant a crop, let alone run a country.
The United States does not want a Year Zero. Ours is a nation with a heritage most Americans are proud of, and we’re proud of the oppression we’ve defeated over the years. Erasing that history only means we’d be doomed to repeat it.
As such, the polls are likely going to remain the same until the election. At that point, the silence will be deafening. Americans will pull the cord for Republicans, and we’ll have another 2016 on our hands. All because the left would not stand up to the radicals who want to destroy the nation.
_________
Also from RT
*********
(TLB) published this Op-Ed from RT-USA News with our appreciation for this perspective.
About the author
Micah Curtis Micah Curtis is a game and tech journalist from the U.S. Aside from writing for RT, he hosts the podcast Micah and The Hatman, and is an independent comic book writer. Follow Micah at @MindofMicahC
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …


thelibertybeacon--2020-06-25--Freedom Of Speech: Media’s Actions Say – NOT If You Are Conservative (Video)

Freedom Of Speech : Media ’ s Actions Say – NOT If You Are Conservative SEE 2 VITAL VIDEOS BELOW THIS INTRO ARTICLE Today it does not matter if you are an independent or a conservative ( and even for some moderate liberals ) … if you do not subscribe to the radical progressive global agenda being forced down our ( and most of the worlds ) throats , you will be trivialized , and if that does not work … you will be destroyed !
And this is far too easy to prove in the land of 24/7 impeachment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wind .
So if you stop to think … something far too many have forgotten how to do , being a Conservative , and even an open-minded Independent in many cases today means you are basically the enemy of all things Liberal or Progressive , all things righteous , and … all things ( by their definition ) American !
You are a NAZI , a Fascist simply because of what you think and believe in , up-to and including the Constitution ( racist document by racist white men ) … and you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ taken down , but … destroyed !
NO those are not overstatements in the least !
Lets take a look and see just how pervasive this scenario is today .
• None How many Conservatives marched through city after city in America burning and destroying the life and livelihood of mostly the poor and minorities they professed to represent ?
• None How many Conservatives occupied a significant portion of an inner city to the detriment of its occupants both in livelihood and in total lack of security .
This allowing for murder @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , property destruction , business owner shakedowns , etc… without penalty for the perpetrators , or justice for those they have harmed or destroyed ?
• None How many Conservatives were paid and bused into ( from out of state ) cities with protests specifically to incite and perpetrate violence and destruction on communities they wont have to live in after the fact … ?
And the list of appropriate questions could go on and on … Something tells me the answers are quite clear … well at least to us non-Progressives … @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that are labeled as NAZI ’ s or Fascists … How the hell does that make ANY sense at all ?
?
?
Today we live in a world where even Orwell would shake his head in disbelief .
I want to focus on a growing issue , social media and its vast and growing hold on so much of this country ’ s ( and indeed the worlds ) attention .
Unlike the MainStream Media ( MSM ) which is slowly ( but surely ) dying right before our eyes .
Today @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some eyes to this reality on the mainstream social media platforms , we are de-platformed , put in detention , shadow-banned , or given some other algorithm smack-down .
If ( heaven forbid ) we dare to complain about this , we are called crazy , conspiracy theorists , or told we were fact checked and found to be peddling false information .
These Progressives will never admit their absolutely seditious and/or treasonous actions such as , partaking in the violent overthrow of government , and silencing first amendment rights for those they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they commit , fund , or allow without ramifications … It is not my mission with this commentary to bog you down with facts most should already know .
What I would like to present here is several videos from Project Veritas helping to explain in more detail what actually is hidden behind the curtain Toto has yet to pull back .
Big Social Media is NOT our friend !
… unless you are a BLM or ANTIFA member … then come on in , sit down , prop your feet up , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Conservative or Independent lives … because Uncle ( Moneybags ) Soros says we should !
• None To say I am pissed is an understatement !
• None To say America is in trouble is an understatement !
• None To say America is already is a soft civil war is NOT an overstatement !
• None To say TLB intends to help do something about this is an understatement !
How do you see this ending ?
?
?
Please watch these vital videos to understand why the first amendment carries no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is rampant !
THIS NEEDS TO STOP !
!
!
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate , and for this we are grateful and excited !
But we must also be practical .
For 7 years we have not asked for any donations , and have built this project with our own funds as we grew .
We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent .
So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you visit them .
Nothing is too small .
We thank you for all your support and your considerations … ( TLB )

Freedom Of Speech: Media’s Actions Say – NOT If You Are Conservative
SEE 2 VITAL VIDEOS BELOW THIS INTRO ARTICLE
Commentary by: Roger Landry (TLB)
Today it does not matter if you are an independent or a conservative (and even for some moderate liberals) … if you do not subscribe to the radical progressive global agenda being forced down our (and most of the worlds) throats, you will be trivialized, and if that does not work … you will be destroyed! And this is far too easy to prove in the land of 24/7 impeachment farce based on a fart in the wind.
So if you stop to think … something far too many have forgotten how to do, being a Conservative, and even an open-minded Independent in many cases today means you are basically the enemy of all things Liberal or Progressive, all things righteous, and … all things (by their definition) American! You are a NAZI, a Fascist simply because of what you think and believe in, up-to and including the Constitution (racist document by racist white men) … and you need to be … not stopped or taken down, but … destroyed!
NO those are not overstatements in the least!
Lets take a look and see just how pervasive this scenario is today.
QUESTIONS:
How many Conservatives marched through city after city in America burning and destroying the life and livelihood of mostly the poor and minorities they professed to represent?
How many Conservatives occupied a significant portion of an inner city to the detriment of its occupants both in livelihood and in total lack of security. This allowing for murder, rape, robbery, personal attacks, property destruction, business owner shakedowns, etc… without penalty for the perpetrators, or justice for those they have harmed or destroyed?
How many Conservatives were paid and bused into (from out of state) cities with protests specifically to incite and perpetrate violence and destruction on communities they wont have to live in after the fact … ?
And the list of appropriate questions could go on and on …
Something tells me the answers are quite clear … well at least to us non-Progressives … Yet it is the Conservatives and Independents that are labeled as NAZI’s or Fascists … How the hell does that make ANY sense at all ???
Today we live in a world where even Orwell would shake his head in disbelief.
I want to focus on a growing issue, social media and its vast and growing hold on so much of this country’s (and indeed the worlds) attention. Unlike the MainStream Media (MSM) which is slowly (but surely) dying right before our eyes. Today if you or I try to open some eyes to this reality on the mainstream social media platforms, we are de-platformed, put in detention, shadow-banned, or given some other algorithm smack-down. If (heaven forbid) we dare to complain about this, we are called crazy, conspiracy theorists, or told we were fact checked and found to be peddling false information.
These Progressives will never admit their absolutely seditious and/or treasonous actions such as, partaking in the violent overthrow of government, and silencing first amendment rights for those they don’t/wont agree with … actions they commit, fund, or allow without ramifications …
It is not my mission with this commentary to bog you down with facts most should already know. What I would like to present here is several videos from Project Veritas helping to explain in more detail what actually is hidden behind the curtain Toto has yet to pull back.
Big Social Media is NOT our friend!
… unless you are a BLM or ANTIFA member … then come on in, sit down, prop your feet up, and help us ruin a few more Conservative or Independent lives … because Uncle (Moneybags) Soros says we should!
To say I am pissed is an understatement!
To say America is in trouble is an understatement!
To say America is already is a soft civil war is NOT an overstatement!
To say TLB intends to help do something about this is an understatement!
How do you see this ending ???
Please watch these vital videos to understand why the first amendment carries no water on Big Social Media and tyranny is rampant!
••••
Content Moderator: ‘If Someone’s Wearing MAGA Hat, I’m Going to Delete Them for Terrorism’
••••
Another Insider Details Political Censorship; Current HR Exec ‘No One Has White Man’s Back’
••••
THIS NEEDS TO STOP !!!
••••
TLB asks you to please support Project Veritas at the links below: Support our work with tax deductible donation: https://www.projectveritas.com/donate Sign up to get our emails: https://confirmsubscription.com/h/j/E… Follow us on social media: Project Veritas Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ProjectVeritas Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/Project_Veritas Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/project_ver… James O’Keefe Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JamesOKeefeA… Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/jamesokeefeiii Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jamesokeefe…
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.