thehuffingtonpost--2020-09-10--Over A Dozen Black And Latino Men Accused A Cop Of Humiliating, Invasive Strip Searches. The NYPD Ke

Over A Dozen Black And Latino Men Accused A Cop Of Humiliating, Invasive Strip Searches. The NYPD Kept Promoting Him.

As for McCormack ’ s record , officers offered various defenses : that aggressive searches can be necessary to find drugs or stay safe ; that he often stopped people of color because he worked in Black and Latino neighborhoods ; that he was “ hands-on ” at a rank when most officers step back ; that criminals may have made false complaints ; even that his red hair may have caused people to identify him more than other officers .
Esposito , who went on to become the department ’ s highest ranking uniformed officer , noted McCormack ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intense beat involving many encounters .
“ He made a lot of arrests .
Twenty-six complaints ?
That ’ s less than one a year , six times where something was substantiated by the CCRB .
Are you kidding me ?
This is just part of his job.
” But many of the officers also said that it ’ s possible to be an effective cop without so many complaints .
An overwhelming majority of the city ’ s 36,000 officers do not have a single substantiated complaint on their records ; only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a critic of the NYPD who has advised the federal government on police accountability , said McCormack ’ s record was troubling .
“ In any normally functioning system , this would be considered a huge red flag and something would have to be done about it , ” he said .
“ If there is a pattern of even unsubstantiated complaints , this should be considered a warning sign.
” In 1989 , New York City was besieged by violence , awash in drugs .
If crime were a fire , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Washington Heights .
Sandwiched between the Hudson and Harlem rivers along the northern reaches of Manhattan , its geography made it perfect for peddlers of crack and heroin ; the George Washington Bridge brought in customers from New Jersey ; I-95 gave access to the Bronx .
Its tenement buildings made for invaluable gang turf , and shootouts for control were nonstop .
At a time when each year brought another record murder tally , more people were killed in the 3-4 than almost anywhere else .
McCormack , who joined the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the moment .
Those who aspired to become detectives needed arrests , said a former detective who worked with him .
“ Riding around in a livery cab , pulling people over , chasing people .
… You had to have a certain level of bravado to put yourself in harm ’ s way like that.
” McCormack had it , and in the ensuing years , he would benefit from a novel way in which the NYPD would measure and respond to crime .
In 1994 , new Commissioner William Bratton instituted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of just responding to 911 calls , the department would vastly expand its use of data , seeking to pinpoint , even predict , hot spots and deploy officers accordingly .
Inspired by the “ Broken Windows ” theory in criminology , the NYPD began directing intense attention to the most minor infractions , believing this would improve public safety and reduce crime overall .
Every person McCormack stopped became a data point ; the guns he recovered , the baggies of cocaine he pulled , all tallied like points on a scoreboard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than ever .
The CCRB countered that its investigators are rigorously trained and every recommendation is reviewed by experienced professionals , “ ensuring that investigations are thorough , complete and fair.
” It ’ s the police who slow-walk and sometimes all-out obstruct their investigations , CCRB staffers have told ProPublica .
Even when the CCRB substantiates a complaint , the police commissioner can veto or downgrade the proposed discipline .
Court records show the department has historically rejected substantiated complaints that hinge on the credibility of a witness .
And the NYPD @ @ @ @ @ @ @ substantiated findings in complaints about stops , frisks , searches and trespasses .
At the time of Miller and Phillips ’ complaint , substantiated allegations sometimes went to an administrative trial where the judge was an NYPD employee , the officer could be represented by union lawyers and the cases were prosecuted by an NYPD lawyer .
“ Nobody goes through CCRB and says , ‘ Hey listen , I ’ m going to really find my justice here , ’ ” said Marq Claxton , a former NYPD detective and spokesman for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ represents Black police officers who advocate for civil rights .
“ You go through all these machinations … and jump all the hurdles … and finally make it to a point where you get a founded complaint against a police officer and ultimately the penalty will be decided by the police commissioner.
” Records show that Phillips complained about McCormack again , just before he was scheduled to testify against him in the administrative trial .
He said that he encountered McCormack and another officer at a restaurant on Mt .
Eden Avenue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Is this the guy ?
” And the two began taking photos of Phillips with their cellphones .
Officers denied that their phones were equipped with cameras , and Phillips could not be reached by investigators .
McCormack was later found not guilty of the substantiated allegations .
He was never punished .
Miller was disappointed , but not surprised .
“ The system is not working , especially in the Black community , ” he said .
“ It ’ s not for us.
” “ It ’ s a broken system @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s a system that was not intended to work effectively and it ’ s doing exactly what it was put there to do .
And that ’ s to give cover to the Police Department , to give the illusion or the impression that they have some semblance of independence in investigating these police misconduct cases .
But the reality of the situation is that it ’ s not independent at all.
” In June , the New York City Council passed a reform package that required the NYPD to improve and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ week , the department released a draft of its “ disciplinary matrix , ” which , among other changes , could impose stiffer penalties for supervisors who commit misconduct , but ultimately those penalties will still ultimately be decided by the commissioner .
NYPD is collecting public comments on the proposal .
Documents show the allegations against McCormack grew , but the outcomes remained largely the same as he continued to advance .
In two years , he went from lieutenant to captain to commanding officer .
By September 2011 , McCormack was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 40th Precinct in Mott Haven .
He would supervise roughly 235 officers patrolling an area of the Bronx that remained stubbornly violent , even as crime fell almost everywhere else .
“ I spent 38 years of my life in the Bronx , ” he later said at a court hearing , referring to his upbringing on the other side of the borough , in the Throgs Neck neighborhood .
“ I was very excited about going back.
” Community leaders and police officers helped him identify a cluster of public housing six @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from which violence appeared to emanate .
McCormack impressed police executives .
He took part in federal prosecutions of gangs in the area , and in rapid-fire CompStat sessions at Police Headquarters , he could deftly explain upticks in crime or enforcement .
“ It ’ s a numbers game , ” said Edward Carrasco , a lawyer and retired NYPD deputy inspector , voicing an opinion about metrics held by many in the department .
“ In the simplest form , CompStat is : ‘ Hey , you know , you wrote @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , you have to write 101 .
And next year , you have to write 102.
’ … So when that ’ s how the game is played , the more aggressive you are , the better — and I ’ m using my air quotes here — the ‘ better ’ supervisor you are .
”

ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive our biggest stories as soon as they’re published. ProPublica is working with THE CITY, WNYC/Gothamist and The Marshall Project to report on how allegations of misconduct by law enforcement officers in New York are investigated and to examine and analyze police disciplinary records that have recently been made public. This story includes reporting and analysis done by THE CITY.
Christopher McCormack is one of the New York Police Department’s highest-ranking officers. As an assistant chief, he helps oversee drug enforcement and organized crime investigations throughout the city. He was hand-picked for the promotion two years ago by his old friend James O’Neill, who was police commissioner.
Advertisement
But his ascension started three decades earlier, when he was a rookie cop patrolling drug-infested Washington Heights. “He was always the first guy out of the car,” said Joseph Esposito, his precinct commander at the time. “Always the tip of the spear.” He would earn the nickname “Red Rage” for his ginger hair, fiery temperament and aggressive approach to policing.
Street cop. Sergeant. Lieutenant. By 2006, McCormack was running his own narcotics squad. Captain. Deputy Inspector. By 2011, he had his own precinct, more than 200 officers in his command. His rise continued, said a former colleague, like “greased lightning.”
Along the way, police leaders were privy to an ever-growing list of complaints against McCormack, signs that his harsh tactics and heated temperament were pushing the limits. Some of the grievances were made in lawsuits that the city eventually settled. Others were submitted to the Civilian Complaint Review Board, created to investigate misconduct. Many of the allegations were hidden from public view.
Using court records, newly released data and a trove of confidential documents, ProPublica has pieced together just how much top officials had to look past to promote him.
Advertisement
The allegations against McCormack read in some ways like those against many other cops in the NYPD: that he was destructive in searching a home or overly physical with someone on the street. What stands out, though, is how often Black and Latino men accused him of invasive, humiliating searches. They say he pulled down their pants in public, exposing their genitals; some said he used his fingers to search for drugs around and inside their anal cavities or directed his officers to do so.
All told, ProPublica found that at least 15 men spoke to this pattern of behavior.
One man claimed he was “told to get on all fours while naked” before he was probed with a finger. Another said McCormack searched him so violently, pulling crack cocaine from his anal cavity, that he felt he needed to go to the hospital. Then there was Unique Kennedy, who said that when McCormack dug around in his underwear, “it felt like someone getting sexually abused, assaulted.”
McCormack is just one of dozens of high-ranking NYPD officers who have risen despite allegations of misconduct in their records.
Eighty-six of the roughly 420 officers in the department who currently hold a rank above captain — running precincts and other large commands and overseeing hundreds of officers — have tallied at least one misconduct allegation that was substantiated by the CCRB, meaning that investigators amassed enough evidence of offenses, ranging from bad language to pistol whippings, to say that they happened and broke patrol guidelines. The most common involved improper property entries and searches.
For many of the officers, their substantiated complaints are dwarfed by a far larger list of those that are “unsubstantiated,” meaning investigators could not reach a conclusion on what had happened. Sometimes, complainants have no witnesses to support their claim. Other times, the NYPD fails to hand over key evidence.
Advertisement
Of at least 77 allegations made against him in 26 separate CCRB complaints, 29 were unsubstantiated; five were “unfounded,” meaning investigators concluded the incident never took place; and 27 were “exonerated,” meaning the conduct fell within patrol guidelines. Investigators have never proved that McCormack strip-searched men in the street, let alone penetrated them with his finger, though the city settled four lawsuits involving strip-search allegations against him for a total $184,500.
In all, the CCRB substantiated 16 allegations lodged in six complaints, most involving the stops and searches of young men of color. No other high-ranking NYPD officer has amassed as many substantiated CCRB complaints.
Promoted Up the Ranks Over three decades, Christopher McCormack rose to an elite tier of the New York Police Department numbering only 25 officers. Promotions beyond the rank of captain are primarily at the discretion of the police commissioner.
Sources: Independent Budget Office; NYPD (Rob Weychert/ProPublica and Allen Tan/ProPublica; research by Mollie Simon/ProPublica) ProPublica
To understand why and how officers can be promoted despite such records, ProPublica spoke with dozens of people who crossed McCormack’s path, from colleagues who admire him to Black men who say he violated them to CCRB investigators who parsed through complaints about him and officers like him. We obtained confidential investigative files to understand how the CCRB examined allegations against him.
Advertisement
When we reached McCormack, he referred us to the Police Department, which did not answer questions about his record or the extent to which it had independently investigated the citizen complaints before promoting him. Documents obtained by ProPublica show that at least one strip-search allegation was referred to the NYPD’s Internal Affairs Bureau, which then sent it to NYPD leadership; it’s unclear what happened afterward.
The NYPD said that it continuously evaluates the conduct of its officers “through a host of internal monitors” and factors in their CCRB histories and lawsuits, along with their “record of fighting crime,” before promoting them.
But more than a dozen current and former officers say there is no formal system for examining CCRB complaints as part of the promotions process, and there should be, especially if an officer’s record suggests a pattern of troubling conduct.
Christopher McCormack is sworn in as a deputy chief during a 2017 ceremony at Police Headquarters. (NYPD) ProPublica
As for McCormack’s record, officers offered various defenses: that aggressive searches can be necessary to find drugs or stay safe; that he often stopped people of color because he worked in Black and Latino neighborhoods; that he was “hands-on” at a rank when most officers step back; that criminals may have made false complaints; even that his red hair may have caused people to identify him more than other officers. Esposito, who went on to become the department’s highest ranking uniformed officer, noted McCormack’s long tenure in narcotics, an intense beat involving many encounters. “He made a lot of arrests. Twenty-six complaints? That’s less than one a year, six times where something was substantiated by the CCRB. Are you kidding me? This is just part of his job.” But many of the officers also said that it’s possible to be an effective cop without so many complaints. An overwhelming majority of the city’s 36,000 officers do not have a single substantiated complaint on their records; only 1 in 9 does. Alex Vitale, a critic of the NYPD who has advised the federal government on police accountability, said McCormack’s record was troubling. “In any normally functioning system, this would be considered a huge red flag and something would have to be done about it,” he said. “If there is a pattern of even unsubstantiated complaints, this should be considered a warning sign.” In 1989, New York City was besieged by violence, awash in drugs. If crime were a fire, it burned hottest in the 34th Precinct in Washington Heights. Sandwiched between the Hudson and Harlem rivers along the northern reaches of Manhattan, its geography made it perfect for peddlers of crack and heroin; the George Washington Bridge brought in customers from New Jersey; I-95 gave access to the Bronx. Its tenement buildings made for invaluable gang turf, and shootouts for control were nonstop. At a time when each year brought another record murder tally, more people were killed in the 3-4 than almost anywhere else. McCormack, who joined the force that July, seemed made for the moment. Those who aspired to become detectives needed arrests, said a former detective who worked with him. “Riding around in a livery cab, pulling people over, chasing people. … You had to have a certain level of bravado to put yourself in harm’s way like that.” McCormack had it, and in the ensuing years, he would benefit from a novel way in which the NYPD would measure and respond to crime. In 1994, new Commissioner William Bratton instituted a management system called CompStat. Instead of just responding to 911 calls, the department would vastly expand its use of data, seeking to pinpoint, even predict, hot spots and deploy officers accordingly. Inspired by the “Broken Windows” theory in criminology, the NYPD began directing intense attention to the most minor infractions, believing this would improve public safety and reduce crime overall. Every person McCormack stopped became a data point; the guns he recovered, the baggies of cocaine he pulled, all tallied like points on a scoreboard by a department that valued statistics more than ever.
Commissioner William Bratton and Mayor Rudy Giuliani announce high-level promotions at a City Hall press conference on Jan. 9, 1995. (Tamara Beckwith/New York Post Archives /(c) NYP Holdings, Inc. via Getty Images) ProPublica
For men who lived in high-crime neighborhoods, always communities of color, the dragnet descended and never let up. Even as crime began to decline, ultimately falling to some of the lowest levels in the city’s modern history, many of those neighborhoods endured an exponential surge in the practice of stopping and questioning people deemed suspicious.
Over the years, a profound consequence of the NYPD’s expansion of stop-and-frisk became clear. Most of those stopped were young and Black; almost all had been acting lawfully, walking away without an arrest or summons.
In 2013, a federal judge ruled that the way the NYPD had carried out stop-and-frisk violated the constitutional rights of people of color. It cast such a cloud over the legacy of former Mayor Michael Bloomberg that during his presidential run last year, he apologized, acknowledging that it had led to an “erosion of trust.” The city has since tried to distance itself from it.
Advertisement
Many of the more than 12,000 CCRB complaints examined by ProPublica stem from broken windows offenses and stop-and-frisk policing.
ProPublica obtained them this summer through a public records request after New York repealed a controversial state law that had kept them secret for decades. But soon after, the unions persuaded a federal judge to block further releases of records that were not substantiated. The lawsuit is ongoing. In response to questions about the records, the NYPD said it is waiting for the conclusion of the lawsuit to comment in detail. “While we remain committed to increased transparency, we are equally committed to due process.”
The complaints reflect a level of aggression incentivized by top police officials, said Darius Charney, an attorney with the Center for Constitutional Rights who helped lead the federal case against stop-and-frisk. Cops that are “out there arresting a lot of people, ticketing a lot of people, harassing a lot of people, that’s the kind of police activity that these departments around the country reward.”
There is a stubborn belief that exists within the department that large numbers of complaints are just proof that a cop is doing the job right, and cops without them aren’t aggressive enough, former officers and CCRB investigators said.
In her nearly three years as a CCRB investigator, Krista Kano said she saw “more and more cases that I had substantiated and I didn’t feel like the consequences mattered or were a deterrent for that behavior.”
Advertisement
Maurice Phillips is still fuming over what he said McCormack did to him on the afternoon of Jan. 22, 2003.
“Harassing, harassing,” Phillips said in a recent interview. “It wasn’t cool.”
The way he tells it, he and his friend Carlos Ortiz were standing outside of a housing project in the South Bronx when McCormack pulled up in a police van, stopped them and began searching through their pockets. McCormack took the keys of both Phillips and Ortiz, used them to enter their building, then came back out and threatened them both.
“I’m going to make a promise to both of you,” Phillips later recalled McCormack saying. “I’m gonna come back and lock you up in a month.”
A summary of Maurice Phillips and Carlos Ortiz’s CCRB complaint. (Highlight added by ProPublica.) ProPublica
Phillips also told the CCRB that one of the officers told him to get used to being questioned, “that this is what is going on now in his neighborhood,” investigators wrote. Another officer allegedly told him that he was lucky because they were searching some people every day.
Advertisement
The CCRB received Phillips’ complaint on Jan. 27. Four days later, Phillips was at the same intersection waiting for his friend Leon Miller. He was getting ready to help Miller paint his home in New Jersey when he said McCormack returned with two other officers. This time, in addition to taking Phillips’ keys again, McCormack also found Miller’s keys and searched his car.
When Miller asked McCormack why he was searching his car, he told investigators McCormack replied: “I’m a sergeant. I can do what I want.”
Again, McCormack did not find anything on them and did not arrest them.
In a recent interview, Miller, who has worked for 20 years at the New York City Department of Education as a heating, ventilation and air conditioning technician, said he felt like he was targeted because of his race, hair and car. He said he was driving a Lincoln Navigator and wore his hair in cornrows at the time McCormack searched him.
“It just feels messed up,” he said. “It’s like you just can’t do what you want to do when you’re Black. Like even if you are doing right, they look at things to find out … to make it so you are doing something wrong.”
He decided to complain, too.
Multiple entities are responsible for investigating abuse and corruption by NYPD officers. The department has internal investigators, and state and federal prosecutors can bring criminal charges. But it’s the CCRB that’s supposed to provide an independent venue for citizen complaints. Established 70 years ago to address “police misconduct in their relations with Puerto Ricans and Negros specifically,” it has the authority to investigate everything from discourtesy to excessive force.
Advertisement
When McCormack sat before CCRB investigators to respond to the complaint from Phillips and Miller, he evinced pride that he was well known in the area he patrolled.
“I talk to the whole corner so, uh, they all know me. I always break their chops and stuff like that … in a good way,” he said. “They all call me ‘Sgt. McCormack,’ he’s no joke. They all know when I show up, they gotta leave.”
He said he did not recognize the names of the men, but when shown photos of two of them, he said they were familiar faces on the corner and he may have arrested or written a summons to one before. He told the investigator he only took people’s keys when they agreed to hand them over, and he said he sometimes did this so he could verify that people he stopped were living where they said they lived.
McCormack said he patrolled their corner often because it was known for drug sales. When asked specifically whom he had seen selling drugs, McCormack said “the people we constantly lock up.”
According to the investigation, he said he had no documentation from the day’s events because “any stops he made at this location led to arrests and therefore, Stop-and-Frisk Reports were not required.” McCormack said he didn’t recall stopping the men and he denied taking anyone’s keys.
Advertisement
The CCRB noted that the testimony of each complainant lined up and that it found Miller’s particularly credible. “Mr. Miller is a homeowner in New Jersey and works two janitorial jobs for schools in the Bronx,” the investigators wrote. “Mr. Miller would seem to have little motive to fabricate or exaggerate allegations.”
The investigator substantiated all 10 allegations of “abuse of authority,” including improper searches, threats of arrest and McCormack’s refusal to provide his badge number. The investigator noted that in one of the allegations, neither McCormack nor his fellow officer could “provide any documentation or testimony to demonstrate that they are conducting these investigations in accord with procedural guidelines.”
The CCRB recommended discipline. But it was up to the police commissioner to punish McCormack.
Substantiated allegations against McCormack in the CCRB complaint. (Highlight added by ProPublica.) ProPublica
The NYPD has long chafed at robust civilian oversight, whether from mayors, prosecutors or the CCRB, and police unions have repeatedly sought to limit the agency’s legal authority and political standing. Officers interviewed for this story described the CCRB as inept or ineffectual, saying that the agency is biased against the police and that its staff lacks the investigatory experience to credibly examine allegations of misconduct.
The CCRB countered that its investigators are rigorously trained and every recommendation is reviewed by experienced professionals, “ensuring that investigations are thorough, complete and fair.” It’s the police who slow-walk and sometimes all-out obstruct their investigations, CCRB staffers have told ProPublica. Even when the CCRB substantiates a complaint, the police commissioner can veto or downgrade the proposed discipline. Court records show the department has historically rejected substantiated complaints that hinge on the credibility of a witness. And the NYPD has increasingly disagreed with CCRB’s substantiated findings in complaints about stops, frisks, searches and trespasses. At the time of Miller and Phillips’ complaint, substantiated allegations sometimes went to an administrative trial where the judge was an NYPD employee, the officer could be represented by union lawyers and the cases were prosecuted by an NYPD lawyer. “Nobody goes through CCRB and says, ‘Hey listen, I’m going to really find my justice here,’” said Marq Claxton, a former NYPD detective and spokesman for the Black Law Enforcement Alliance, which represents Black police officers who advocate for civil rights. “You go through all these machinations … and jump all the hurdles … and finally make it to a point where you get a founded complaint against a police officer and ultimately the penalty will be decided by the police commissioner.” Records show that Phillips complained about McCormack again, just before he was scheduled to testify against him in the administrative trial. He said that he encountered McCormack and another officer at a restaurant on Mt. Eden Avenue. The fellow officer asked, “Is this the guy?” And the two began taking photos of Phillips with their cellphones. Officers denied that their phones were equipped with cameras, and Phillips could not be reached by investigators. McCormack was later found not guilty of the substantiated allegations. He was never punished. Miller was disappointed, but not surprised. “The system is not working, especially in the Black community,” he said. “It’s not for us.” Claxton echoed Miller. “It’s a broken system,” he said. “It’s a system that was not intended to work effectively and it’s doing exactly what it was put there to do. And that’s to give cover to the Police Department, to give the illusion or the impression that they have some semblance of independence in investigating these police misconduct cases. But the reality of the situation is that it’s not independent at all.” In June, the New York City Council passed a reform package that required the NYPD to improve and make transparent its disciplinary system. Last week, the department released a draft of its “disciplinary matrix,” which, among other changes, could impose stiffer penalties for supervisors who commit misconduct, but ultimately those penalties will still ultimately be decided by the commissioner. NYPD is collecting public comments on the proposal. Documents show the allegations against McCormack grew, but the outcomes remained largely the same as he continued to advance. In two years, he went from lieutenant to captain to commanding officer. By September 2011, McCormack was deputy inspector and commanding officer of the 40th Precinct in Mott Haven. He would supervise roughly 235 officers patrolling an area of the Bronx that remained stubbornly violent, even as crime fell almost everywhere else. “I spent 38 years of my life in the Bronx,” he later said at a court hearing, referring to his upbringing on the other side of the borough, in the Throgs Neck neighborhood. “I was very excited about going back.” Community leaders and police officers helped him identify a cluster of public housing six blocks north of the Major Deegan Expressway from which violence appeared to emanate. McCormack impressed police executives. He took part in federal prosecutions of gangs in the area, and in rapid-fire CompStat sessions at Police Headquarters, he could deftly explain upticks in crime or enforcement. “It’s a numbers game,” said Edward Carrasco, a lawyer and retired NYPD deputy inspector, voicing an opinion about metrics held by many in the department. “In the simplest form, CompStat is: ‘Hey, you know, you wrote 100 summons last year, this year, you have to write 101. And next year, you have to write 102.’ … So when that’s how the game is played, the more aggressive you are, the better — and I’m using my air quotes here — the ‘better’ supervisor you are.”
CompStat sessions, like this one in 2016, could be crucial for commanders seeking to impress top NYPD leaders, such as then-Chief of Department James O’Neill (center, in white shirt), who would later be appointed police commissioner. (Bryan R. Smith/The New York Times via Redux) ProPublica
To make arrests, McCormack expected officers in his command to make use of their stop-and-frisk authority. Stops tripled in the 40th Precinct for the first six months of his tenure, according to police data. To help understand McCormack’s effect on crime, ProPublica analyzed data that experts consider a bellwether for a violent precinct like the 4-0: murders, rapes and robberies. In the roughly two years that McCormack led the precinct, murders fell, rapes remained about the same and robberies increased.
Two officers who worked with McCormack in that time, Pedro Serrano and Ritchie Baez, said he took stop-and-frisk too far. “We were taught to strip-search every arrest, which is insane,” Serrano said. “He would say if your finger doesn’t smell like shit afterwards, you didn’t do it correctly,” Baez said.
They said he was known as the “credit card swiper” or “credit card Chris,” because of the way he would move his hands through the buttocks of people he was searching. Serrano said he saw McCormack push his hands into men’s underwear on multiple occasions and he would often wonder if the searches were legal.
Advertisement
The NYPD Patrol Guide states, in all uppercase letters, that “UNDER NO CONDITIONS SHALL A BODY CAVITY SEARCH BE CONDUCTED BY ANY MEMBER OF THE SERVICE.” An officer must also have a search warrant to perform a cavity search, and any object found can only be taken out by a medical professional.
At least three men have accused McCormack of performing or supervising cavity searches, including one who said he and another officer brought him to a holding cell, pinned him down and pulled a bag of crack cocaine out of his anus. McCormack, along with the officer, denied the allegation, saying a palm-sized quantity of drugs were in the man’s underwear. It was the man’s word against that of the officers and the CCRB could neither prove nor disprove it.
The patrol guide also mandates that strip-searches are only to be done in the “utmost privacy.” “They’re never to be done in public,” said Brooklyn Defender Services lawyer Maryanne Kaishian. “They’re never to be done to humiliate somebody.”
According to lawsuits and CCRB documents, McCormack is alleged to have conducted public, aggressive searches of men’s genitals on at least six occasions.
Paul Butler, professor at Georgetown University Law Center and author of “Chokehold: Policing Black Men,” said he saw in the McCormack complaints an effort to dominate and publicly humiliate Black men, part of a legacy of mistreatment by law enforcement and citizen mobs dating back to Reconstruction.
Advertisement
“It’s about power,” said Butler, who specialized in prosecuting public corruption when he worked for the Justice Department. “It’s about the police demonstrating their dominance of the streets.”
Serrano said he once saw McCormack pull down a man’s underwear on a sidewalk, exposing his genitals, to conduct a search. The man shivered because he said McCormack’s hands were so cold on the man’s testicles, Serrano recounted. He said he found it especially strange that McCormack was doing this as a deputy inspector, when most commanding officers began to spend more time behind a desk.
Wilbur Chapman is a former deputy commissioner of the NYPD who was once in charge of training. He and other officers said the allegations raise questions about McCormack’s judgment. “I don’t care who you are, if you’re a deputy inspector, there is absolutely no reason for you to strip-search anybody for any reason,” Chapman said. He and several other officers said a subordinate should do so under supervision.
ProPublica spoke with two people who say they were searched this way after McCormack was made a deputy inspector.
On Dec. 31, 2011, Unique Kennedy said he was getting ready to celebrate the New Year. He was leaving a liquor store with friends when McCormack and another officer rolled up to them in a squad car.Kennedy said McCormack pinned him against the wall and dug into his underwear with his free hand.
Advertisement
“Is this legal?” said Kennedy, remembering his thinking. “There are other officers watching and no one can stand up and tell him to stop? I felt violated.”
A summary of Unique Kennedy’s CCRB complaint. (Highlight added by ProPublica.) ProPublica
According to his CCRB complaint, Kennedy was charged with possession of a controlled substance. He said the charges were related to outstanding warrants that had nothing to do with the stop. Kennedy ultimately did not cooperate with the CCRB. He told ProPublica that with a baby on the way, he did not have time to stay involved with an investigation that he was skeptical of to begin with.
As a result, McCormack was never interviewed by investigators.
On the night of Jan. 30, 2012, Devon Johnson was standing outside a housing project on East 143rd Street in the Bronx when McCormack approached him.
“I know you,” said McCormack, according to a CCRB investigation.
McCormack told investigators he had been involved in arresting Johnson five years before. Johnson had drug and weapons convictions on his record and was under federal investigation for dealing crack cocaine in the projects he was standing in front of.
Advertisement
But even for someone who had dealt a lot with police, what happened next surprised and aggravated Johnson.
He complained to the CCRB that McCormack unbuttoned and pulled down his pants and searched for drugs, feeling his genitals and anus through his underwear.
“He has me on the floor, pants halfway down,” he said, recalling the event in a recent interview. “He stripped me butt-naked.”
A summary of Devon Johnson’s CCRB complaint. (Highlight added by ProPublica.) ProPublica
He was not arrested that night. But by the time McCormack sat for an interview with CCRB investigators a year later, Johnson was in federal prison.
Advertisement
In his initial interview with the CCRB, McCormack said that his decision to stop and frisk Johnson was based on a “furtive” action he had observed and that he knew Johnson was a drug dealer. In his second interview, however, McCormack was inconsistent about whether it was his criminal past that influenced his decision to frisk him. At no point did McCormack mention Johnson’s previous weapons charges.
The CCRB determined that McCormack lacked reasonable suspicion at the time that Johnson had committed a crime, and therefore he had no right to stop him or frisk him. Those allegations were substantiated, deemed abuses of authority.
But the allegation that McCormack reached into Johnson’s pants ended like most of the others. Johnson said it happened. McCormack and his partner said it didn’t, and without any additional evidence either way, it went unsubstantiated.
The CCRB decided two other men’s strip-search allegations against McCormack were unfounded. They came to that conclusion once because the alleged search happened in a public place and in broad daylight, suggesting someone would have seen it and said something. The second time, the complainant did not include the allegation in a letter announcing his intent to sue. The allegation was, however, mentioned in later court filings; the city settled the lawsuit for $25,000.
Serrano and Baez would later claim they received low evaluations to punish them for voicing their concerns over McCormack’s orders. They are now suing the NYPD for racial discrimination.
Advertisement
In February 2013, Serrano secretly recorded a long, contentious conversation in which McCormack defended his evaluation. He said Serrano had failed to make enough stops and arrests in a high-crime area, which clearly meant he was a low-performing officer. His activity would be justifiable if he were patrolling Central Park, but he was in the 4-0, where robberies were up 23%.
“We’re still one of the most violent commands in the city,” McCormack told him.
At one point Serrano asked him: “OK. ... So what am I supposed to do? Is it stop every Black and Hispanic?”
McCormack replied: “This is about stopping the right people, the right place, the right location. … Take Mott Haven, where we had the most problems. And the most problems we had there were robberies and grand larcenies.”
When Serrano pressed him further, McCormack said, “The problem was, what? Male Blacks. And I told you at roll call, and I have no problem telling you this: male Blacks, 14 to 20, 21.”
A month later, lawyers suing the city over stop-and-frisk played Serrano’s recording in Manhattan federal court, sending the critical sound bites all over the city. On May 13, 2013, McCormack took the stand and defended himself, saying there had been a spate of robberies in Mott Haven and the perpetrators matched the description he gave Serrano. He said he had never issued quotas.
Advertisement
On Aug. 12, 2013, Judge Shira Scheindlin ruled that the NYPD application of stop-and-frisk violated the constitutional rights of people of color. She noted that while McCormack did “not display the contempt or hostility toward the local population” that she heard in a recording of another officer, his testimony supported her opinion that the “right people” was an indirect form of racial profiling.
“Individuals of all races engage in suspicious behavior and break the law,” she said in her ruling. “Equal protection guarantees that similarly situated individuals of these races will be held to account equally.”
Gabriel De Jesus, the president of the 40th Precinct’s community council, said McCormack’s style was informed by complaints he heard from residents in community board meetings. Several of McCormack’s supporters said the same. “His door was always open,” De Jesus said. “He was also out with his officers, not just in his office. He led by example and people liked that.”
But we spoke to several community leaders in the South Bronx, and they said such meetings can create an unbalanced view of neighborhood needs and concerns.
“If you have an event and you have a whole bunch of cops there, of course, you’re going to hear all the little old ladies,” said Althea Stevens, a director at the East Side House Settlement, an education nonprofit in the South Bronx. “But you didn’t speak to the young people. They’re part of the community.”
Advertisement
Dariella Rodriguez, 40, spent much of her youth in the South Bronx and is now the director of community organizing at The Point, a nonprofit that provides educational and social services in the Hunts Point neighborhood.
She said that she and her friends were often stopped when they came out of school, and her brother would recount being thrown up against buildings by police who aggressively searched him. “It’s not that they got away with it or they hid it or they were sneaky,” she said. “No, they are being rewarded for doing exactly their job and we know that.”
“Being policed like that for so long not only psychologically makes you feel like you’re a bad person, like your community is bad,” said Clarisa Alayeto, who grew up in Mott Haven’s Patterson Houses and is now vice chair of a community board there. “It builds a real bad relationship between us and the Police Department. If you’re someone who’s constantly being stopped and frisked by a police officer, wrongfully, then you know that system is broken. You know that system doesn’t work.”
In 2015, McCormack was promoted to full inspector.
Up to the rank of captain, promotions are based almost exclusively on written tests. Sometimes CCRB complaints are considered, but for the most part, a high score will guarantee promotion.
Beyond the rank of captain, promotions are ultimately at the discretion of the police commissioner.
Mayor Bill de Blasio and Bratton congratulate officers at a promotion ceremony in 2014. (Mark Peterson/Redux) ProPublica
Advertisement
In the past, commissioners have relied on promotion boards to help them evaluate candidates. Chapman, the former deputy commissioner who was once in charge of training, chaired such a panel in 2010. It consisted of five high-ranking officers who gave candidates scores based on how they performed in interviews that covered three areas: technical knowledge, job experience and communications skills. A ranked list was ultimately passed onto the commissioner, who would make the selection.
But Chapman said the rankings really didn’t mean much. On one occasion, a former commissioner selected someone who never even appeared before the panel.
“It is subject to the arbitrary and capricious idiosyncrasies of the mayor and the police commissioner. You might have an all-Irish promotion list or an all-Italian promotion list, or the pressure’s on ‘I’ve got to promote some women and minorities,’” said Chapman, who is Black.
Current and former officers say the most influential factor in advancement comes down to who candidates know. “It’s like a secret society,” said one former high-ranking NYPD officer, adding that family connections are particularly important.
“That type of so-called process for promotion is not at all unusual,” said Walter Katz, vice president of a law enforcement consulting company called Arnold Ventures, which works with police departments across the country on improving their oversight.
Advertisement
“In my experience, past complaints are not at all a factor,” he said. “It signals to the public that the department is not concerned with the public’s opinion and it signals internally that that kind of behavior will not be a detriment to advancement.”
Many officers said complaints are either ignored or weaponized at the whim of the top brass. Several said race plays a role.
“If I’m a minority officer and it’s my turn up, then all of a sudden it matters that when I was a cop 20 years ago, such-and-such happened,” said Anthony Miranda, who retired as an NYPD sergeant and represents roughly 10,000 officers as the CEO of the National Latino Officers Association, a fraternal advocacy group. “Then they say, ‘Well, since you got that on your records, we’re not going to give you that job.’ Then it matters.”
Data shows that while more than half of officers in the lowest rank are people of color, the higher ranks — above captain — are more than 75% white.
A dozen of those high-ranking officers have three or more complaints with substantiated allegations; 10 are white. Five have reached the rank of deputy inspector, the lowest promoted at the commissioner’s discretion; all are white.
Advertisement
“The higher you go up in rank, the more untouchable you are,” said a former Internal Affairs Bureau investigator. “You never see captains or inspectors get hammered or thrown out, even for criminal matters; things a regular cop, or detective, would get fired for, these guys get shielded.”
Jenn Rolnick Borchetta became familiar with McCormack through her work as one of the lead attorneys on the stop-and-frisk case. “There are officers who are wanton and wild with misconduct,” she said. “And those officers the NYPD shuffles around. But then there are officers whose use of aggressive tactics is more of a controlled boil. And those guys get promoted. Those are guys like Chris McCormack.”
McCormack has been accused of misconduct in at least 16 lawsuits, 11 of which settled for a combined $415,000. The allegations ranged from racial discrimination to strip-searches to false arrests.
The city settled three of them in 2016, paying a total of $84,500 to complainants who alleged that McCormack had been involved in improper strip-searches.
That same year, James O’Neill became NYPD commissioner.
McCormack and O’Neill went way back. They worked together in the Bronx and in executing warrants across the city. They also shared two CCRB complaints in 1997. In one, a complainant said one of the officers in their squad threatened to “rip [his] testicles off.” The man was not arrested, and the CCRB substantiated several abuse allegations in the complaint, involving his detention and search. It did not specify the name of the officer who made the threat, but all involved wound up with a finding of misconduct.
Advertisement
Years later, a former cop and commenter on the police blog Thee Rant admired McCormack in a post that referred to him as “O’Neill’s unruly son” and speculated that he, too, might one day become commissioner.
O’Neill and McCormack after his promotion to deputy chief in 2017. (NYPD) ProPublica
ProPublica attempted to reach O’Neill several times, but he did not respond to text messages or phone calls.
Many current and former high-ranking NYPD officers believe McCormack’s relationship with O’Neill was key to his promotions.
“Chris is a hard worker, but he has been accused of many things in his career,” said an NYPD precinct commander who was not authorized to speak publicly on the matter. He was one of two department veterans who accurately guessed on their first attempt that McCormack was the highest ranking officer with the most substantiated CCRB complaints against him.
Advertisement
“If he wasn’t good friends with O’Neill,” he said, “they would have held him back.”
Instead, in 2017, McCormack became a deputy chief.
The year after that, he rose another rank to assistant chief.
Derek Willis contributed reporting.
About the Data
ProPublica relied on multiple sets of data and records to report this story. On July 26, ProPublica published a searchable Civilian Complaint Review Board database that contained the 12,056 closed complaints of every active-duty police officer who had at least one substantiated allegation against them. Those records span September 1985 to January 2020.
The allegation counts in this story differ from those reported in ProPublica’s database, because the organization had access to a broader set of records than was published.
Through a seperate Freedom of Information Law request, ProPublica obtained a larger set of records for McCormack. Those records include complaints that had been withdrawn or where the complainant was uncooperative. Reporters also obtained a separate trove of CCRB investigative files that examined complaints made specifically against him. These documents were the source of some of the incidents of people quoted in this story.
On Aug. 25, the New York Civil Liberties Union published its own, larger database of CCRB records, which we also analyzed. According to the NYCLU website:


thehuffingtonpost--2020-09-11--NIH Director Imagines What Aliens Would Think Of Maskless Trump Supporters

Dr. Francis Collins , the director of the National Institutes of Health , on Thursday conjured an out-of-this-world vision to express his puzzlement at people who don ’ t wear face masks during the coronavirus pandemic .
Collins , during a CNN town hall on the pandemic , was asked by medical correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta to comment on scenes like the one earlier that day at President Donald Trump ’ s campaign rally in Freeland , Michigan , where most of the president ’ s fans were not social distancing or covering their faces .
“ It just deeply @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we get here ?
” asked Collins , the director of the NIH since 2009 .
“ Imagine you were an alien who landed on planet Earth and you saw that our planet was afflicted by an infectious disease and that masks were an effective way to prevent the spread , ” Collins continued .
“ And yet when you went around , you saw some people not wearing them , some people wearing them , and you tried to figure out why and it turned out it was their political party.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this is just not a planet that has much promise for the future if something that is so straightforward can somehow get twisted into decision-making that really makes no sense.
” Trump has mostly discouraged wearing masks , turning it into a politicized issue for his supporters .
Many pride themselves on ignoring guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to wear face masks “ in public settings where other social distancing measures are difficult to maintain.
” The president has rarely worn a mask in public .
He ridicules reporters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democratic candidate Joe Biden for doing so , claiming a psychiatrist would say his 2020 rival has “ some big issues.
” '' Imagine you were an alien who landed on planet Earth , '' says @ NIHDirector , on seeing so few masks at Trump rallies and noting the choice is aligned with political party .
`` You would scratch your head and think this is just not a planet that has much promise for the future . ''
pic.twitter.com/OtvB82g2p5 — Anderson Cooper 360° ( @ AC360 ) September 11 , 2020

LOADING ERROR LOADING
Dr. Francis Collins, the director of the National Institutes of Health, on Thursday conjured an out-of-this-world vision to express his puzzlement at people who don’t wear face masks during the coronavirus pandemic.
Collins, during a CNN town hall on the pandemic, was asked by medical correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta to comment on scenes like the one earlier that day at President Donald Trump’s campaign rally in Freeland, Michigan, where most of the president’s fans were not social distancing or covering their faces.
Advertisement
“It just deeply puzzles me, Sanjay. How did we get here?” asked Collins, the director of the NIH since 2009.
“Imagine you were an alien who landed on planet Earth and you saw that our planet was afflicted by an infectious disease and that masks were an effective way to prevent the spread,” Collins continued. “And yet when you went around, you saw some people not wearing them, some people wearing them, and you tried to figure out why and it turned out it was their political party.”
Collins suggested an extraterrestrial would “think this is just not a planet that has much promise for the future if something that is so straightforward can somehow get twisted into decision-making that really makes no sense.”
“So, as a scientist, I’m pretty puzzled and rather disheartened,” he added.
Trump has mostly discouraged wearing masks, turning it into a politicized issue for his supporters. Many pride themselves on ignoring guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to wear face masks “in public settings where other social distancing measures are difficult to maintain.”
Advertisement
The president has rarely worn a mask in public. He ridicules reporters for wearing masks and last week mocked Democratic candidate Joe Biden for doing so, claiming a psychiatrist would say his 2020 rival has “some big issues.”
Check out Collins’ comments here:


thehuffingtonpost--2020-09-11--Trump Gets Stark History Lesson After Comparing COVID-19 Response To Churchill In WWII

Donald Trump earned himself an immediate fact-check on Twitter Thursday after likening his public downplaying of the coronavirus — even though he knew its deadly nature — to the messaging of the late British Prime Minister Winston Churchill during World War II .
Trump in early February , in taped interviews for journalist Bob Woodward ’ s new book “ Rage , ” admitted he knew the dangers of COVID-19 , even though he was dismissing them in public .
This week , Trump defended his pandemic leadership , claiming he just didn ’ t want to scare Americans .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ his defense at a rally in Michigan .
“ As the British government advised the British people in the face of World War II , keep calm and carry on .
That ’ s what I did , ” said Trump , calling Woodward ― who he spoke to multiple times for the book ― a “ whack job.
” “ They wanted me to come out and scream , ‘ People are dying , ’ No .
No .
We did it just the right way .
We have to be calm @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be crazed lunatics .
We have to lead , ” claimed Trump , who has repeatedly sought to incite panic throughout his time in office .
“ When Hitler was bombing London , Churchill , great leader , would oftentimes go to a roof in London and speak , ” Trump added .
“ And he always spoke with confidence .
He said we have to show calmness .
No , we did it the right way and we ’ ve done a job like nobody.
” Critics on Twitter , including CNN @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Churchill was actually “ famously blunt ” about the dire situation facing the United Kingdom during the war .
They also shared excerpts of the late leader ’ s addresses and compared them to Trump ’ s falsehoods about the pandemic that ’ s now killed more than 190,000 people nationwide : Oh man .
Trump : `` As the British government advised the British people in the face of World War II , keep calm and carry on .
That 's what I did . ''
Churchill was famously blunt with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get .
— Daniel Dale ( @ ddale8 ) September 11 , 2020 “ The British people can face any misfortune w/ fortitude & buoyancy as long as they are convinced that those in charge of their affairs are not deceiving them , or are not dwelling in a fool ’ s paradise ” —Winston Churchill https : //t.co/L5jadWU6r7 — Jon Meacham ( @ jmeacham ) September 11 , 2020 What Churchill actually said : `` We are in the preliminary stage of one of the greatest battles in history ...
I have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , tears and sweat .
We have before us an ordeal of the most grievous kind ... many , many long months of struggle and of suffering . ''
https : //t.co/nR7xrDPu6X — ( ( ( Yair Rosenberg ) ) ) ( @ Yair_Rosenberg ) September 11 , 2020 Things Churchill did n't say : - the Blitz is a hoax - the Nazis will miraculously be gone by April - going to a fallout shelter is voluntary ; I do n't think I 'll be doing it - I do n't take @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tom Malinowski ( @ Malinowski ) September 11 , 2020 This would make sense of Churchill said that the Nazis would just go away .
Like a miracle , ... when the weather gets warm in April .
https : //t.co/9VjHy255qz — Roshan Rinaldi ( @ Roshan_Rinaldi ) September 11 , 2020 What the Churchill family thinks of Donald Trump .
Seems Soames is unlikely to second his feeble effort to liken himself to Winston .
I imagine Churchill himself might have thought the comparison ... *accent please* ... invidious .
https : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) September 11 , 2020

LOADING ERROR LOADING
Donald Trump earned himself an immediate fact-check on Twitter Thursday after likening his public downplaying of the coronavirus — even though he knew its deadly nature — to the messaging of the late British Prime Minister Winston Churchill during World War II.
Trump in early February, in taped interviews for journalist Bob Woodward’s new book “Rage,” admitted he knew the dangers of COVID-19, even though he was dismissing them in public. This week, Trump defended his pandemic leadership, claiming he just didn’t want to scare Americans.
Advertisement
On Thursday, Trump doubled down on his defense at a rally in Michigan.
“As the British government advised the British people in the face of World War II, keep calm and carry on. That’s what I did,” said Trump, calling Woodward ― who he spoke to multiple times for the book ― a “whack job.”
“They wanted me to come out and scream, ‘People are dying,’ No. No. We did it just the right way. We have to be calm. We don’t want to be crazed lunatics. We have to lead,” claimed Trump, who has repeatedly sought to incite panic throughout his time in office.
“When Hitler was bombing London, Churchill, great leader, would oftentimes go to a roof in London and speak,” Trump added. “And he always spoke with confidence. He said we have to show calmness. No, we did it the right way and we’ve done a job like nobody.”
Check out the clip here:
This is fucking absurd pic.twitter.com/VwyTaCZDtq — Acyn Torabi (@Acyn) September 11, 2020
Advertisement
Critics on Twitter, including CNN fact-checker Daniel Dale, pointed out that Churchill was actually “famously blunt” about the dire situation facing the United Kingdom during the war.
They also shared excerpts of the late leader’s addresses and compared them to Trump’s falsehoods about the pandemic that’s now killed more than 190,000 people nationwide:
Oh man. Trump: "As the British government advised the British people in the face of World War II, keep calm and carry on. That's what I did."
Churchill was famously blunt with the British people about how bad things could get. — Daniel Dale (@ddale8) September 11, 2020
Quiz: which one is Churchill and which one is Trump? pic.twitter.com/AP80uIO8Kk — Daniel Dale (@ddale8) September 11, 2020
More from Winston Churchill, famous downplayer pic.twitter.com/c3WGehAEPZ — Daniel Dale (@ddale8) September 11, 2020
Advertisement
“The British people can face any misfortune w/ fortitude & buoyancy as long as they are convinced that those in charge of their affairs are not deceiving them, or are not dwelling in a fool’s paradise”—Winston Churchill https://t.co/L5jadWU6r7 — Jon Meacham (@jmeacham) September 11, 2020
Winston Churchill totally downplaying things: pic.twitter.com/WxcshwGXI8 — James Pethokoukis (@JimPethokoukis) September 11, 2020
What Churchill actually said: "We are in the preliminary stage of one of the greatest battles in history... I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat. We have before us an ordeal of the most grievous kind... many, many long months of struggle and of suffering." https://t.co/nR7xrDPu6X — (((Yair Rosenberg))) (@Yair_Rosenberg) September 11, 2020
Things Churchill didn't say:
- the Blitz is a hoax
- the Nazis will miraculously be gone by April
- going to a fallout shelter is voluntary; I don't think I'll be doing it
- I don't take responsibility at all https://t.co/aHX0P9bUVN — Tom Malinowski (@Malinowski) September 11, 2020
This would make sense of Churchill said that the Nazis would just go away. Like a miracle,... when the weather gets warm in April. https://t.co/9VjHy255qz — Roshan Rinaldi (@Roshan_Rinaldi) September 11, 2020
Advertisement


thehuffingtonpost--2020-09-11--Fox News Reporter Nails The Hypocrisy Of Trump's Attacks On Anonymous Sources

Fox News ’ national security correspondent Jennifer Griffin highlighted the hypocrisy of Donald Trump ’ s repeated attacks on journalists ’ use of anonymous sources , saying she understands the president himself is “ one of the biggest anonymous sources for the White House press corps.
” In the latest episode of Mediaite ’ s podcast “ The Interview ” released Thursday , Griffin explained why she used anonymous sources to verify elements of Trump ’ s reported insulting of U.S. troops that was first reported by The Atlantic last week .
Multiple other media outlets have independently confirmed Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fallen U.S. World War I soldiers “ suckers ” and “ losers.
” Trump denied the remarks and demanded Griffin be fired from the conservative cable news network .
“ Sometimes you have to use anonymous sources , ” Griffin said on “ The Interview.
” “ It ’ s not our preference .
Of course I would prefer to have people on the record .
But there are a variety of reasons right now , particularly under this administration , that anonymous sources are needed.
” Griffin recalled that Watergate whistleblower “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and “ it didn ’ t make him less real .
It didn ’ t make what he said less true.
” “ That ’ s just the way it goes .
And I ’ m quite certain that the president knows who these anonymous sources are , because they are real , ” she said .
She added that “ it ’ s my understanding ” that “ one of the biggest anonymous sources for the White House press corps is President Trump himself , and the people around him are often @ @ @ @ @ @ @ talk about at the White House.
” “ So , it ’ s completely hypocritical , ” said Griffin .
“ People are picking and choosing when they want to hear from anonymous sources.
” “ Again , as a journalist , it ’ s not my first choice , ” the reporter continued .
“ I ’ d much prefer to have people on the record and for the most part , I do get people on the record , but this was a sensitive story and I have to respect the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they don ’ t want to go on the record at this time.
” Trump , who before becoming president reportedly used a fake name to phone reporters pretending to be his own spokesperson , has repeatedly attacked critical stories based on anonymous sources .
Meanwhile , he cites supposed anonymous sources to denounce rivals , promote conspiracy theories and make the case for his policies .

LOADING ERROR LOADING
Fox News’ national security correspondent Jennifer Griffin highlighted the hypocrisy of Donald Trump’s repeated attacks on journalists’ use of anonymous sources, saying she understands the president himself is “one of the biggest anonymous sources for the White House press corps.”
In the latest episode of Mediaite’s podcast “The Interview” released Thursday, Griffin explained why she used anonymous sources to verify elements of Trump’s reported insulting of U.S. troops that was first reported by The Atlantic last week.
Advertisement
Multiple other media outlets have independently confirmed Trump’s disparaging comments, including calling fallen U.S. World War I soldiers “suckers” and “losers.” Trump denied the remarks and demanded Griffin be fired from the conservative cable news network.
“Sometimes you have to use anonymous sources,” Griffin said on “The Interview.” “It’s not our preference. Of course I would prefer to have people on the record. But there are a variety of reasons right now, particularly under this administration, that anonymous sources are needed.”
Griffin recalled that Watergate whistleblower “Deep Throat” was one such source and “it didn’t make him less real. It didn’t make what he said less true.”
“That’s just the way it goes. And I’m quite certain that the president knows who these anonymous sources are, because they are real,” she said. She added that “it’s my understanding” that “one of the biggest anonymous sources for the White House press corps is President Trump himself, and the people around him are often the anonymous sources that you hear them talk about at the White House.”
Advertisement
“So, it’s completely hypocritical,” said Griffin. “People are picking and choosing when they want to hear from anonymous sources.”
“Again, as a journalist, it’s not my first choice,” the reporter continued. “I’d much prefer to have people on the record and for the most part, I do get people on the record, but this was a sensitive story and I have to respect the wishes of those sources as to why they don’t want to go on the record at this time.”


thehuffingtonpost--2020-09-11--Melania Trump’s Tweet About The Truth Is Too Much For People On Twitter

Melania Trump tweeted about “ the truth ” on Thursday and it was too ironic for many people to handle .
“ The truth will prevail !
” the first lady wrote in solidarity with a post from her chief of staff Stephanie Grisham accusing someone of “ spreading falsehoods in exchange for a few dollars & some TV time.
” It ’ s unclear exactly who Grisham was referring to with her tweet .
Social media users suggested it was about the journalist Bob Woodward or the first lady ’ s former friend , Stephanie Winston Wolkoff , who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about the Trump White House .
Critics of the first lady ’ s tweet recalled her past support of her husband ’ s racist “ birther ” conspiracy theory about former President Barack Obama and the thousands of lies that President Donald Trump has told since taking office : A Trump wouldn ’ t know a truth if it slapped them across the face !
— Erin ( @ ErinRF ) September 11 , 2020 It will , indeed .
And that will end the reign of the wannabe king .
Your husband @ @ @ @ @ @ @ words make you look like a fool .
Or just another liar .
— Khashoggi ’ s Ghost ( @ UROCKlive1 ) September 11 , 2020 We don ’ t believe any Queen Birther has to say .
Liar — carol ( @ carolshappylife ) September 11 , 2020 Truth : President Coronavirus @ realDonaldTrump downplays safety guidelines & holds rallies , promoting virus spread .
@ POTUS therefore has contributed directly to a death toll of more than 191,000 Americans .
Voters see # TrumpkillsAmericans .
# BeBest https : //t.co/7Csmu1Qww9 — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Then Vote ( @ byLorenaBlas ) September 11 , 2020 It sure will and the truth is not on the Trumps side .
— Rita Lopes ( @ RitaLop1963 ) September 11 , 2020 We die , and you do n't care .
We get it already .
— Elisa ( @ ginkowest ) September 11 , 2020 Really you would not know or tell the truth if it were in front of you .
pic.twitter.com/jdv8GAcL42 — Pat Lynn ( @ BjrjmkeT ) September 11 , 2020 Damn straight the truth will prevail @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And do n't let the door hit you on the way out .
— Lisa ( @ Winterhascome66 ) September 11 , 2020 Did you have your fingers crossed when you typed that ?
https : //t.co/ZZ5MIedBNd — Scribulatora ( @ Scribulatora ) September 11 , 2020

LOADING ERROR LOADING
Melania Trump tweeted about “the truth” on Thursday and it was too ironic for many people to handle.
“The truth will prevail!” the first lady wrote in solidarity with a post from her chief of staff Stephanie Grisham accusing someone of “spreading falsehoods in exchange for a few dollars & some TV time.”
The truth will prevail! https://t.co/kZeQAkpnC8 — Melania Trump (@FLOTUS) September 11, 2020
Advertisement
It’s unclear exactly who Grisham was referring to with her tweet. Social media users suggested it was about the journalist Bob Woodward or the first lady’s former friend, Stephanie Winston Wolkoff, who have both released books containing damning allegations about the Trump White House.
Critics of the first lady’s tweet recalled her past support of her husband’s racist “birther” conspiracy theory about former President Barack Obama and the thousands of lies that President Donald Trump has told since taking office:
You don't know what truth is. — Joe Banks (@Sea_Hyker) September 11, 2020
A Trump wouldn’t know a truth if it slapped them across the face! — Erin (@ErinRF) September 11, 2020
Advertisement
It will, indeed. And that will end the reign of the wannabe king.
Your husband lies constantly about literally everything.
These words make you look like a fool.
Or just another liar. — Khashoggi’s Ghost (@UROCKlive1) September 11, 2020
We don’t believe any Queen Birther has to say. Liar — carol (@carolshappylife) September 11, 2020
Truth: President Coronavirus @realDonaldTrump downplays safety guidelines & holds rallies, promoting virus spread. @POTUS therefore has contributed directly to a death toll of more than 191,000 Americans. Voters see #TrumpkillsAmericans. #BeBest https://t.co/7Csmu1Qww9 — Lorena Blas - Register to Vote & Then Vote (@byLorenaBlas) September 11, 2020
It sure will and the truth is not on the Trumps side. — Rita Lopes (@RitaLop1963) September 11, 2020
TRUTH?? HUH!
YOU ARE ALL LIARS! https://t.co/pUx88Q9Vy5 — Denise L. Perrault (@perrault777) September 11, 2020
Advertisement
We die, and you don't care. We get it already. — Elisa (@ginkowest) September 11, 2020
Really you would not know or tell the truth if it were in front of you. pic.twitter.com/jdv8GAcL42 — Pat Lynn (@BjrjmkeT) September 11, 2020
Damn straight the truth will prevail! Pack your bags, Melania. And don't let the door hit you on the way out. — Lisa (@Winterhascome66) September 11, 2020
Did you have your fingers crossed when you typed that? https://t.co/ZZ5MIedBNd — Scribulatora (@Scribulatora) September 11, 2020
I miss Michelle — Michael Drake (@mikedrake178) September 11, 2020


thehuffingtonpost--2020-09-10--NYT Reporter Booted From Trump Rally After Posting About Maskless Attendees

A reporter for The New York Times was kicked out of a rally for President Donald Trump in Freeland , Michigan , on Thursday after noting on social media that many of the president ’ s supporters were not wearing masks or keeping their distance despite the COVID-19 pandemic .
Kathy Gray , a correspondent for the Times , was on site for the airport rally attended by about 5,000 people .
Just before Trump ’ s arrival , the reporter noted it seemed as if only about 10 % of those gathered were wearing masks , saying people were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ One landed .
About 30 minutes later and just a few minutes into the president ’ s speech , Gray said she had been kicked out .
“ First for me : Trump campaign tracked me down from pics I tweeted and escorted me out , ” she wrote on Twitter .
Trump has been under fire this week for his actions during the early days of the coronavirus pandemic after details from journalist Bob Woodward ’ s forthcoming book , “ Rage , ” were revealed .
In the book , he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dangers of COVID-19 in early February but publicly moved to , as he said in a taped interview , “ play it down … because I don ’ t want to cause a panic.
” Trump has spent months urging the country to get back to normal despite high rates of infection in some states .
More than 190,000 people in the U.S. have now died of COVID-19 .
The crowd at the event mirrored the one that gathered Aug. 27 for Trump ’ s acceptance speech at the end of the Republican @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gathered on the White House lawn , and most were seen crowded together while not wearing face masks .
Michigan Gov .
Gretchen Whitmer ( D ) said earlier this week that the prospect of a “ maskless ” rally in Michigan was “ distressing to say the least.
” “ We ’ ve pushed our curve down , we ’ ve saved thousands of lives , we ’ ve gotten people back to work , ” Whitmer told CNN ’ s Anderson Cooper on Tuesday .
“ And events like this threaten @ @ @ @ @ @ @ made .
I would love to see the leader of our country embrace masks and encourage people to do the right thing.
” Former Vice President Joe Biden , the Democratic presidential nominee , held his own event in Michigan this week .
That event was closed to the public and attendees and journalists present were asked to remain in chairs spaced throughout a parking lot .
Biden criticized the president ahead of his event on Thursday .

LOADING ERROR LOADING
A reporter for The New York Times was kicked out of a rally for President Donald Trump in Freeland, Michigan, on Thursday after noting on social media that many of the president’s supporters were not wearing masks or keeping their distance despite the COVID-19 pandemic.
Kathy Gray, a correspondent for the Times, was on site for the airport rally attended by about 5,000 people. Just before Trump’s arrival, the reporter noted it seemed as if only about 10% of those gathered were wearing masks, saying people were “crammed in” as Air Force One landed.
Advertisement
Crammed in crowd in the rain for trump rally in michigan. Not many masks pic.twitter.com/5DZ6JBVNK8 — Kathy Gray (@michpoligal) September 10, 2020
About 30 minutes later and just a few minutes into the president’s speech, Gray said she had been kicked out.
“First for me: Trump campaign tracked me down from pics I tweeted and escorted me out,” she wrote on Twitter.
I’ve just been kicked out of the trump rally. — Kathy Gray (@michpoligal) September 10, 2020
Advertisement
The White House did not immediately reply to HuffPost’s request for comment on Gray’s removal.
Trump has been under fire this week for his actions during the early days of the coronavirus pandemic after details from journalist Bob Woodward’s forthcoming book, “Rage,” were revealed. In the book, he says that the president knew about the dangers of COVID-19 in early February but publicly moved to, as he said in a taped interview, “play it down … because I don’t want to cause a panic.”
Trump has spent months urging the country to get back to normal despite high rates of infection in some states. More than 190,000 people in the U.S. have now died of COVID-19.
The crowd at the event mirrored the one that gathered Aug. 27 for Trump’s acceptance speech at the end of the Republican National Convention. About 1,500 people had gathered on the White House lawn, and most were seen crowded together while not wearing face masks.
Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D) said earlier this week that the prospect of a “maskless” rally in Michigan was “distressing to say the least.”
“We’ve pushed our curve down, we’ve saved thousands of lives, we’ve gotten people back to work,” Whitmer told CNN’s Anderson Cooper on Tuesday. “And events like this threaten all that sacrifice that we’ve made. I would love to see the leader of our country embrace masks and encourage people to do the right thing.”
Advertisement
Former Vice President Joe Biden, the Democratic presidential nominee, held his own event in Michigan this week. That event was closed to the public and attendees and journalists present were asked to remain in chairs spaced throughout a parking lot. Biden criticized the president ahead of his event on Thursday.
“Michiganders need a pandemic response,” Biden wrote, “not a pep rally.”


thehuffingtonpost--2020-09-11--Daily Coronavirus Deaths Laid Bare On Time’s First Black Border Cover Since 9/11

The devastating human toll that the coronavirus has taken on the United States is laid bare on Time ’ s new cover .
Artist John Mavroudis hand-wrote the mounting day-by-day count of people who died from COVID-19 for the weekly newsmagazine ’ s Sept. 21 cover , headlined “ An American Failure.
” The magazine ditched its signature red border on the cover for only the second time in its history for the issue .
The first time followed the 9/11 terror attacks .
“ I really hope this cover is a wake-up call for those who are numbed to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his cover .
“ Science and common sense are the answers to this crisis.
” “ How many more before we finally wake up ?
” he asked on Instagram .
The pandemic has killed more than 190,000 people nationwide .
The death toll is expected to pass 200,000 by the edition ’ s publication date .
TIME ’ s new cover : COVID-19 has killed nearly 200,000 Americans .
How many more lives will be lost before the U.S. gets it right ?
https : //t.co/fGSXgl0Uj2 pic.twitter.com/8o89XTVZ5V — TIME ( @ TIME @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s cover story itself ― headlined “ COVID-19 Has Killed Nearly 200,000 Americans .
How Many More Lives Will Be Lost Before the U.S. Gets It Right ?
” ― seeks to explain how “ a failure of leadership at many levels and across parties ; a distrust of scientists , the media and expertise in general ; and deeply ingrained cultural attitudes about individuality and how we value human lives have all combined to result in a horrifically inadequate pandemic response .
”

LOADING ERROR LOADING
The devastating human toll that the coronavirus has taken on the United States is laid bare on Time’s new cover.
Artist John Mavroudis hand-wrote the mounting day-by-day count of people who died from COVID-19 for the weekly newsmagazine’s Sept. 21 cover, headlined “An American Failure.”
Advertisement
The magazine ditched its signature red border on the cover for only the second time in its history for the issue. The first time followed the 9/11 terror attacks.
“I really hope this cover is a wake-up call for those who are numbed to this catastrophe,” Mavroudis said of his cover. “Science and common sense are the answers to this crisis.”
“How many more before we finally wake up?” he asked on Instagram.
The pandemic has killed more than 190,000 people nationwide. The death toll is expected to pass 200,000 by the edition’s publication date.
Check out the cover here:
TIME’s new cover: COVID-19 has killed nearly 200,000 Americans. How many more lives will be lost before the U.S. gets it right? https://t.co/fGSXgl0Uj2 pic.twitter.com/8o89XTVZ5V — TIME (@TIME) September 10, 2020
Advertisement


thehuffingtonpost--2020-09-10--Clip From 'Unfit' Documentary Explores Trump's 'Cognitive Decline' Over Time

In a new film unpacking the psychology of Donald Trump , author and psychologist John Gartner says the president demonstrates numerous signs of cognitive deterioration and ties that to grave concerns about Trump ’ s fitness for the Oval Office .
“ This is almost a science fiction kind of novel that we are living in now , ” Gartner said in an exclusive clip from the documentary “ Unfit : The Psychology of Donald Trump.
” “ He is cognitively deteriorating , ” Gartner argued .
“ If you look at interviews that he gave in the 1980s and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He actually had a very sophisticated vocabulary .
He spoke in actually polished paragraphs.
” “ His vocabulary is impoverished ; he uses a lot of superlatives and filler words that we see in people who are reaching for language , ” he said .
“ Quite often , he shows what we call tangential thinking , which is that he goes from one idea and then just sort of drifts in mid-sentence to another idea.
” Gartner , who has a Ph.D. in clinical psychology and taught for nearly three decades at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ department of psychiatry , also refers to instances in which the president has appeared to be unable to recall fairly significant events .
“ Why is this important ?
” he asked .
“ We have someone who is really not functioning cognitively who has the capacity to launch the nuclear codes.
” “ Unfit ” explores myriad aspects of Trump ’ s psyche in consultation with mental health experts .
The film was made in partnership with Duty To Warn , a coalition of mental health professionals and others who advocate for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the grounds that he is psychologically unfit .
Gartner was a founding member of this group .
Armchair psychologists , along with real ones , have shared speculative diagnoses of the president for several years .
One of the more recent examples is Trump ’ s own niece Mary Trump , a clinical psychologist , who gave more personal insight into what she viewed as Trump ’ s narcissistic tendencies in her book .
There has long been debate over the ethics of analyzing Trump ’ s mental state .
Opponents say it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , violates the Goldwater Rule , an ethical rule from the American Psychiatric Association that prevents psychiatrists from offering professional opinions about a public figure they have not examined .
Others have argued that it ’ s in the public interest to highlight the roots of Trump ’ s actions in office .

LOADING ERROR LOADING
In a new film unpacking the psychology of Donald Trump, author and psychologist John Gartner says the president demonstrates numerous signs of cognitive deterioration and ties that to grave concerns about Trump’s fitness for the Oval Office.
“This is almost a science fiction kind of novel that we are living in now,” Gartner said in an exclusive clip from the documentary “Unfit: The Psychology of Donald Trump.”
Advertisement
“He is cognitively deteriorating,” Gartner argued. “If you look at interviews that he gave in the 1980s and 1990s, he was very articulate. He actually had a very sophisticated vocabulary. He spoke in actually polished paragraphs.”
Gartner juxtaposed clips from that time with the way Trump speaks at present.
“His vocabulary is impoverished; he uses a lot of superlatives and filler words that we see in people who are reaching for language,” he said. “Quite often, he shows what we call tangential thinking, which is that he goes from one idea and then just sort of drifts in mid-sentence to another idea.”
Gartner, who has a Ph.D. in clinical psychology and taught for nearly three decades at the Johns Hopkins Medical School’s department of psychiatry, also refers to instances in which the president has appeared to be unable to recall fairly significant events.
“Why is this important?” he asked. “We have someone who is really not functioning cognitively who has the capacity to launch the nuclear codes.”
Advertisement
“Unfit” explores myriad aspects of Trump’s psyche in consultation with mental health experts. The film was made in partnership with Duty To Warn, a coalition of mental health professionals and others who advocate for Trump’s removal from office on the grounds that he is psychologically unfit. Gartner was a founding member of this group.
Armchair psychologists, along with real ones, have shared speculative diagnoses of the president for several years. One of the more recent examples is Trump’s own niece Mary Trump, a clinical psychologist, who gave more personal insight into what she viewed as Trump’s narcissistic tendencies in her book.
There has long been debate over the ethics of analyzing Trump’s mental state. Opponents say it creates stigma and, among other issues, violates the Goldwater Rule, an ethical rule from the American Psychiatric Association that prevents psychiatrists from offering professional opinions about a public figure they have not examined. Others have argued that it’s in the public interest to highlight the roots of Trump’s actions in office.
Directed by Dan Partland, “Unfit” also features legal professionals, historians and prominent anti-Trump Republican figures, including conservative attorney George Conway, former White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci and conservative commentator Bill Kristol.


thehuffingtonpost--2020-09-10--Trump Said He’d Give Himself An 'A' For His Handling Of COVID-19

President Donald Trump told journalist Bob Woodward in July that he deserved an A for his handling of the coronavirus pandemic that had already killed over 70,000 people by that time .
The Washington Post reporter interviewed Trump 18 times for roughly nine hours total for his new book , “ Rage.
” Continuing a discussion about his leadership , the president told Woodward in July how he thought he ’ d handled COVID-19 .
Trump insisted that he ’ d begun “ executing ” his plans , saying “ I will have immigration done .
I will have health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ re going to have vaccines soon .
I think we already have them.
” “ But they ’ re in tests , ” he added .
“ And you ’ ll see them being announced over the next month .
Now would you view that as a game-changer ?
” Woodward responded by asking Trump what grade he would give himself for his handling of the pandemic .
“ I give ourselves an A , ” said Trump .
“ But the grade is incomplete , and I ’ ll tell you why @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccines and therapeutics , then I give myself an A-plus.
” “ I can handle more than other people can handle , ” Trump replied .
He added that “ very strong people , people that are successful , even ” had told him , “ I swear to you , I don ’ t know how it ’ s possible for you to handle what you handle .
How you ’ ve done this , with the kind of opposition , the kind of shenanigans , the kind of illegal witch hunts.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the virus has nothing to do with me ” and said , “ It ’ s not my fault .
It ’ s ― China let the damn virus out.
” COVID-19 has now claimed the lives of more than 190,000 Americans and more than 900,000 people worldwide .
In an earlier interview with Woodward , the president admitted that he knowingly downplayed the severity of the disease .

LOADING ERROR LOADING
President Donald Trump told journalist Bob Woodward in July that he deserved an A for his handling of the coronavirus pandemic that had already killed over 70,000 people by that time.
The Washington Post reporter interviewed Trump 18 times for roughly nine hours total for his new book, “Rage.” Continuing a discussion about his leadership, the president told Woodward in July how he thought he’d handled COVID-19.
Advertisement
Trump insisted that he’d begun “executing” his plans, saying “I will have immigration done. I will have health care done. I think we’re going to have vaccines soon. I think we already have them.”
“But they’re in tests,” he added. “And you’ll see them being announced over the next month. Now would you view that as a game-changer?”
Woodward responded by asking Trump what grade he would give himself for his handling of the pandemic.
“I give ourselves an A,” said Trump. “But the grade is incomplete, and I’ll tell you why. If we come up with the vaccines and therapeutics, then I give myself an A-plus.”
Advertisement
MANDEL NGAN via Getty Images
Taking it further, Woodward asked Trump what he’s “learned” about himself.
“I can handle more than other people can handle,” Trump replied. He added that “very strong people, people that are successful, even” had told him, “I swear to you, I don’t know how it’s possible for you to handle what you handle. How you’ve done this, with the kind of opposition, the kind of shenanigans, the kind of illegal witch hunts.”
The president later added that “the virus has nothing to do with me” and said, “It’s not my fault. It’s ― China let the damn virus out.”
COVID-19 has now claimed the lives of more than 190,000 Americans and more than 900,000 people worldwide.
In an earlier interview with Woodward, the president admitted that he knowingly downplayed the severity of the disease.
Advertisement


thehuffingtonpost--2020-09-10--Trump Denigrated His Generals, Called Them ‘A Bunch Of P**sies,' Woodward Writes

More of President Donald Trump ’ s disparaging remarks about U.S. military members , veterans and his own staff have come to light .
This time , in reference to his generals , whom he called “ a bunch of pussies.
” In a copy of Bob Woodward ’ s book “ Rage , ” obtained by HuffPost , Woodward shares an anecdote involving former Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and an aide , Bradley Byers .
While signing an executive order to assess how to strengthen the manufacturing and defense industrial base , Trump was talking to both Byers and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump asked Navarro if he would take charge of negotiations on steel and criticized U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross as “ weak negotiators.
” Trump then added : “ Not to mention my fucking generals are a bunch of pussies .
They care more about their alliances than they do about trade deals.
” President Donald Trump ( center ) , with Defense Secretary Jim Mattis at his left , at a meeting with European Union leaders in Brussels on May 25 , 2017 .
Mattis led the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Byers would later tell Mattis about the remark , who had Byers put it in an email to him to document it .
As Woodward notes , “ for the president to speak that way in front of a subordinate like Byers and others was a gross violation of a basic Leadership 101 principle ― praise in public , criticize in private.
” This anecdote from Woodward ’ s book , to be released next week , comes on the heels of a report in The Atlantic that said the president has repeatedly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fallen war heroes , “ suckers ” and “ losers.
” Earlier this week , Trump claimed that U.S. soldiers are in love with him .
At the same White House press conference , he also said top Pentagon officials probably weren ’ t in love with him “ because they want to do nothing but fight wars so that all of those wonderful companies that make the bombs and make the planes and make everything else stay happy.
” His comments were widely criticized on social media , with many pushing back @ @ @ @ @

LOADING ERROR LOADING
More of President Donald Trump’s disparaging remarks about U.S. military members, veterans and his own staff have come to light. This time, in reference to his generals, whom he called “a bunch of pussies.”
In a copy of Bob Woodward’s book “Rage,” obtained by HuffPost, Woodward shares an anecdote involving former Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and an aide, Bradley Byers.
Advertisement
While signing an executive order to assess how to strengthen the manufacturing and defense industrial base, Trump was talking to both Byers and White House trader adviser Peter Navarro. Trump asked Navarro if he would take charge of negotiations on steel and criticized U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross as “weak negotiators.”
Trump then added: “Not to mention my fucking generals are a bunch of pussies. They care more about their alliances than they do about trade deals.”
President Donald Trump (center), with Defense Secretary Jim Mattis at his left, at a meeting with European Union leaders in Brussels on May 25, 2017. Mattis led the Department of Defense until January 2019. Stephanie Lecocq/pool via ASSOCIATED PRESS
Byers would later tell Mattis about the remark, who had Byers put it in an email to him to document it. As Woodward notes, “for the president to speak that way in front of a subordinate like Byers and others was a gross violation of a basic Leadership 101 principle ― praise in public, criticize in private.”
Advertisement
This anecdote from Woodward’s book, to be released next week, comes on the heels of a report in The Atlantic that said the president has repeatedly called members of the military, including fallen war heroes, “suckers” and “losers.”


thehuffingtonpost--2020-09-11--Fox News Analyst And Longtime Trump Friend: ‘More Likely Than Not’ He Insulted War Dead

Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano explained why he believes , as a longtime friend of Donald Trump , it is “ more likely than not ” that the president insulted fallen U.S. troops during a visit to France in 2018 .
Napolitano addressed Trump ’ s reported slurring of American service members as “ suckers ” and “ losers ” — first reported by The Atlantic last week and since confirmed by Fox News and other outlets — in his column for the conservative network ’ s website published Thursday .
Trump , who has a long record @ @ @ @ @ @ @ soldiers killed , wounded and taken prisoner in combat , denied making the disparaging comments .
Napolitano , a former New Jersey Superior Court judge , noted he ’ s been a friend of the president since 1987 and that they still “ to this day ” speak on the phone “ from time to time over matters public and private.
” But “ to be Trump ’ s friend does not immunize one from Trump ’ s wrath , ” wrote Napolitano , who said the president “ expects total loyalty , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and he will not hesitate to attack his friends publicly should he hear anything from them that displeases him.
” Napolitano recalled Trump attacking him on Twitter over a TV appearance in which he talked about the Russia investigation .
They later brushed the incident off in a call .
“ I provide this brief personal background as a setting for an analysis of this ‘ losers ’ and ‘ suckers ’ allegation .
It appears more likely than not that he did say these things , ” said Napolitano .
“ I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worse ― Donald Trump is unfiltered .
He often says what first comes to his mind without thinking of the likely consequences ― including the hurt ― his words could produce .
And he believes he can repair any hurt with more words .
”

LOADING ERROR LOADING
Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano explained why he believes, as a longtime friend of Donald Trump, it is “more likely than not” that the president insulted fallen U.S. troops during a visit to France in 2018.
Napolitano addressed Trump’s reported slurring of American service members as “suckers” and “losers” — first reported by The Atlantic last week and since confirmed by Fox News and other outlets — in his column for the conservative network’s website published Thursday.
Advertisement
Trump, who has a long record of cruel and insensitive remarks about U.S. soldiers killed, wounded and taken prisoner in combat, denied making the disparaging comments.
Napolitano, a former New Jersey Superior Court judge, noted he’s been a friend of the president since 1987 and that they still “to this day” speak on the phone “from time to time over matters public and private.”
But “to be Trump’s friend does not immunize one from Trump’s wrath,” wrote Napolitano, who said the president “expects total loyalty, particularly from those in the media, and he will not hesitate to attack his friends publicly should he hear anything from them that displeases him.”
Napolitano recalled Trump attacking him on Twitter over a TV appearance in which he talked about the Russia investigation. They later brushed the incident off in a call.
Advertisement


thehuffingtonpost--2020-09-10--Woodward: Americans Had 'Little Idea' Of How 'Dangerous' Nuclear Threat Was In 2017

Bob Woodward reports that Americans probably didn ’ t realize how close the country was to a war in 2017 , courtesy of President Donald Trump ’ s Twitter behavior and missile testing .
In a copy of the journalist ’ s book “ Rage ” obtained by HuffPost , Woodward explained what was happening inside the White House amid rising tension between Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in mid-2017 .
As the U.S. and North Korea were both testing missiles , Trump would tweet erratically about North Korea or Kim , calling him names like “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ often trying to impose reason over impulse .
And you see where I wasn ’ t able to , because tweets would get out there , ” former Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis is quoted as saying .
President Donald Trump and North Korea 's leader , Kim Jong Un , talk before a meeting in the Demilitarized Zone on June 30 , 2019 , in Panmunjom .
Woodward also describes Mattis as having gone regularly to pray and sleeping in his clothes during this time in an effort to be ready at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Korea .
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was quoted as saying , “ We never knew whether it was real or whether it was a bluff.
” Woodward summarized the moment with a chilling quote : “ The American people had little idea that July through September of 2017 had been so dangerous.
” Later in the book , Trump verified this remark during a December 2019 interview with Woodward .
“ If I weren ’ t president , we would have ― perhaps it would be over by now , and perhaps @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ ve been in a major war , ” he told Woodward of that time period .
Trump also implored Woodward , repeatedly , to not mock Kim in any of his reporting : “ Don ’ t mock Kim .
I don ’ t want a fucking nuclear war .
”

LOADING ERROR LOADING
Bob Woodward reports that Americans probably didn’t realize how close the country was to a war in 2017, courtesy of President Donald Trump’s Twitter behavior and missile testing.
In a copy of the journalist’s book “Rage” obtained by HuffPost, Woodward explained what was happening inside the White House amid rising tension between Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in mid-2017.
Advertisement
As the U.S. and North Korea were both testing missiles, Trump would tweet erratically about North Korea or Kim, calling him names like “Little Rocket Man.”
“I was often trying to impose reason over impulse. And you see where I wasn’t able to, because tweets would get out there,” former Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis is quoted as saying.
President Donald Trump and North Korea's leader, Kim Jong Un, talk before a meeting in the Demilitarized Zone on June 30, 2019, in Panmunjom. BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images
Woodward also describes Mattis as having gone regularly to pray and sleeping in his clothes during this time in an effort to be ready at any time for an attack from North Korea.
Advertisement
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was quoted as saying, “We never knew whether it was real or whether it was a bluff.”
Woodward summarized the moment with a chilling quote: “The American people had little idea that July through September of 2017 had been so dangerous.”
Later in the book, Trump verified this remark during a December 2019 interview with Woodward.
“If I weren’t president, we would have ― perhaps it would be over by now, and perhaps it wouldn’t ― we would’ve been in a major war,” he told Woodward of that time period.