newspunch--2020-01-22--Washington Democrats Push Bill Forcing Kids To Attend LGBT Sex Classes

Democrat lawmakers in Washington state are pushing a bill that requires children as young as 5 to attend LGBT sex education classes at school .
Concerned parents in Washington state have told their government that they do not want their kindergarten-aged children to participate in “ comprehensive sexual health education ” but the state ’ s Democrats believe they know better , KTTH reported Monday .
The legislation , House Bill 2184 , is designed to address issues like affirmative consent , but also includes lessons that address the “ LGBTQ+ students ” and teaches children about gay sex .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ a survey conducted by the state ’ s Comprehensive Sexual Health Education work group showed that a 54-percent majority do not want sex education taught to children from kindergarten through fifth grade .
But the CSHE ignored the survey because mandatory sexual education is “ an issue of equity and would help to ensure all students across the state receive quality , evidence-informed instruction , regardless of who they are or where they live.
” The government bureaucrats running the survey know better than the parents because , they say , according to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ needs of our youngest students must be addressed for prevention of future challenges.
” The group that made this decision was comprised of 16 people , all of them women — something that Republican State Rep. Michelle Caldier was not a fan of .
“ I think that sometimes , you know in politics and when we ’ re making decisions that it ’ s very easy to surround ourselves with people who just agree with us and I think that if the work group just had conversations and no disagreement , that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s a lot of disagreement for that , ” she said .
“ And I would encourage you guys to go back and really listen to the people who disagree and come back with something better.
” A representative from the office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction did acknowledge that the group was all-female but said “ we were exposed to a wide variety of viewpoints around the state.
” Did they ?
Because 54 percent of survey respondents said they didn ’ t support the proposal , yet the CSHE @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the group wants to expose students to includes things like telling them that the term “ boner ” is incorrect because the penis does not have any bones .
And girls would be taught about a “ very sensitive little area at the top called the clitoris.
” Why would kids — grade-school-aged kids — need to know this ?
What possible purpose could it serve ?
The curriculum also focuses on talking about affirmative consent , but takes it to an extreme of making sound like the two parties need some type @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It is fair to say that for the majority of us we are familiar with a whole lot of implied consent .
You know , like no one stopping or asking anyone to stop .
We call it common sense .
The nonpartisan Foundation for Individual Rights in Education has said that affirmative-consent policies “ threaten fundamental fairness by enforcing standards against accused students that are often vague and/or overbroad , and may lack the details necessary for students to comply .
Indeed , many such policies are , for all practical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proposed curriculum also enforces the “ progressive ” idea that gender and sex are not the same thing .
And the program would start in kindergarten .
“ This lesson does , however , acknowledge that ‘ there are some body parts that mostly just girls have and some parts that mostly just boys have .
Being a boy or a girl doesn ’ t have to mean you have those parts , but for most people this is how their bodies are , ” the curriculum reads .
Allow me to help @ @ @ @ @ @ @ party of science : Yes , having those parts does determine if you are a male or a female .
First-grade students are encouraged to read a children ’ s book called “ My Princess Boy ” about gender expression , and when students get to sixth grade , the indoctrination becomes even more intense .
“ You may notice language throughout the curriculum that seems less familiar – using the pronoun ‘ they ’ instead of ‘ her ’ or ‘ him , ’ using gender neutral names in scenarios and role-plays @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vulva ’ vs. a girl or woman .
This is intended to make the curriculum inclusive of all genders and gender identities , ” the curriculum continues .
We are either in the Twilight Zone or the Book of Revelation .
How dare the state educate kids on subjects the majority of parents have said they do not want them to ?
More and more public schools have become social-justice indoctrination camps .
It could be the reason homeschooling is growing as parents decide they do not want their kids brainwashed .

1.2k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Democrat lawmakers in Washington state are pushing a bill that requires children as young as 5 to attend LGBT sex education classes at school.
Concerned parents in Washington state have told their government that they do not want their kindergarten-aged children to participate in “comprehensive sexual health education” but the state’s Democrats believe they know better, KTTH reported Monday.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
The legislation, House Bill 2184, is designed to address issues like affirmative consent, but also includes lessons that address the “LGBTQ+ students” and teaches children about gay sex.
WesternJournal report: This is even after a survey conducted by the state’s Comprehensive Sexual Health Education work group showed that a 54-percent majority do not want sex education taught to children from kindergarten through fifth grade.
But the CSHE ignored the survey because mandatory sexual education is “an issue of equity and would help to ensure all students across the state receive quality, evidence-informed instruction, regardless of who they are or where they live.”
The government bureaucrats running the survey know better than the parents because, they say, according to KTTH, that the “social emotional needs of our youngest students must be addressed for prevention of future challenges.”
The group that made this decision was comprised of 16 people, all of them women — something that Republican State Rep. Michelle Caldier was not a fan of.
“I think that sometimes, you know in politics and when we’re making decisions that it’s very easy to surround ourselves with people who just agree with us and I think that if the work group just had conversations and no disagreement, that really concerns me because I know there’s a lot of disagreement for that,” she said.
“And I would encourage you guys to go back and really listen to the people who disagree and come back with something better.”
A representative from the office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction did acknowledge that the group was all-female but said “we were exposed to a wide variety of viewpoints around the state.”
Did they? Because 54 percent of survey respondents said they didn’t support the proposal, yet the CSHE is still recommending it.
The curriculum the group wants to expose students to includes things like telling them that the term “boner” is incorrect because the penis does not have any bones.
And girls would be taught about a “very sensitive little area at the top called the clitoris.”
Why would kids — grade-school-aged kids — need to know this? What possible purpose could it serve?
The curriculum also focuses on talking about affirmative consent, but takes it to an extreme of making sound like the two parties need some type of verbal contract before engaging in sex.
It is fair to say that for the majority of us we are familiar with a whole lot of implied consent. You know, like no one stopping or asking anyone to stop. We call it common sense.
The nonpartisan Foundation for Individual Rights in Education has said that affirmative-consent policies “threaten fundamental fairness by enforcing standards against accused students that are often vague and/or overbroad, and may lack the details necessary for students to comply. Indeed, many such policies are, for all practical purposes, impossible to follow.”
The proposed curriculum also enforces the “progressive” idea that gender and sex are not the same thing.
And the program would start in kindergarten.
“This lesson does, however, acknowledge that ‘there are some body parts that mostly just girls have and some parts that mostly just boys have. Being a boy or a girl doesn’t have to mean you have those parts, but for most people this is how their bodies are,” the curriculum reads.
Allow me to help you with this one, oh mighty party of science: Yes, having those parts does determine if you are a male or a female.
First-grade students are encouraged to read a children’s book called “My Princess Boy” about gender expression, and when students get to sixth grade, the indoctrination becomes even more intense.
“You may notice language throughout the curriculum that seems less familiar – using the pronoun ‘they’ instead of ‘her’ or ‘him,’ using gender neutral names in scenarios and role-plays and referring to ‘someone with a vulva’ vs. a girl or woman. This is intended to make the curriculum inclusive of all genders and gender identities,” the curriculum continues.
We are either in the Twilight Zone or the Book of Revelation.
How dare the state educate kids on subjects the majority of parents have said they do not want them to?
More and more public schools have become social-justice indoctrination camps. It could be the reason homeschooling is growing as parents decide they do not want their kids brainwashed.


newspunch--2020-01-22--Trump Floors Elites at Davos: ‘America Is WINNING Like Never Before’

President Donald Trump stunned world leaders at the World Economic Forum in Davos on Tuesday after declaring that “ America is winning like never before.
” “ Since my election , the net worth of the bottom half of wage-earners has increased by 47 percent , three times faster than the increase for the top one percent , ” he continued .
“ The American dream is back , bigger , better , and stronger than ever before , ” he said .
“ America ’ s thriving , America ’ s flourishing , and yes , America is winning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ told the crowd .
“ No one is benefiting more than America ’ s middle class , ” he added .
“ We have created 1.2 million manufacturing and construction jobs – a number also unthinkable.
” “ America ’ s newfound prosperity is undeniable , unprecedented and unmatched anywhere in the world , ” Trump declared .
“ America achieved this stunning turnaround not by making minor changes to a handful of policies , but by adopting a whole new approach centered entirely on the well-being of the American worker.
” “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trade , regulation , energy , immigration , education and more is focused on improving the lives of everyday Americans , ” he said .
“ Only when governments put their own citizens first will people be fully invested in their national futures .
”

986 SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
President Donald Trump stunned world leaders at the World Economic Forum in Davos on Tuesday after declaring that “America is winning like never before.”
“This is a blue-collar boom,” POTUS stated.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
“Since my election, the net worth of the bottom half of wage-earners has increased by 47 percent, three times faster than the increase for the top one percent,” he continued.
“The American dream is back, bigger, better, and stronger than ever before,” he said.
“America’s thriving, America’s flourishing, and yes, America is winning again like never before,” Trump told the crowd.
“No one is benefiting more than America’s middle class,” he added. “We have created 1.2 million manufacturing and construction jobs – a number also unthinkable.”
“America’s newfound prosperity is undeniable, unprecedented and unmatched anywhere in the world,” Trump declared.
“America achieved this stunning turnaround not by making minor changes to a handful of policies, but by adopting a whole new approach centered entirely on the well-being of the American worker.”
“Every decision we make on taxes, trade, regulation, energy, immigration, education and more is focused on improving the lives of everyday Americans,” he said. “Only when governments put their own citizens first will people be fully invested in their national futures.”
WATCH:


newspunch--2020-01-22--French Undergraduate Textbook Admits CIA Orchestrated 9/11

A French publisher has been forced to apologize after a history textbook admitted that the 9/11 attacks were probably “ orchestrated by the CIA ” .
The bombshell claim was highlighted on social media by a group of outraged schoolteachers .
The book ‘ History of the 20th Century in Flash Cards ‘ is aimed at undergraduate students .
In the book , writer Jean-Pierre Rocher , a teacher of history and geography and a graduate of the Sciences Po university in Paris , explains the context of the creation of al-Qaeda and the “ quadruple terrorist attack of 11/9 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ This global event – no doubt orchestrated by the CIA ( secret services ) to impose American influence on the Middle East ?
– hit the symbols of American power on its own territory.
” Although the book came out last November , it was not until the daughter of one of the school teachers bought a copy that one of them spotted the reference to the CIA and decided to demand that references to 9/11 being an inside job were scrubbed .
BBC News reports : The teacher immediately shared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ group whose spokesman , Bruno Modica , told Le Monde “ it blew up very quickly ” .
“ There were 122 comments ; this inserted clause of his conveys a conspiracy theory you can hear in our classrooms , from some pupils ’ mouths ; but to find it written by a teacher and in this type of publication is unacceptable .
”

569 SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
A French publisher has been forced to apologize after a history textbook admitted that the 9/11 attacks were probably “orchestrated by the CIA”.
The bombshell claim was highlighted on social media by a group of outraged schoolteachers.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
The book ‘History of the 20th Century in Flash Cards‘ is aimed at undergraduate students. In the book, writer Jean-Pierre Rocher, a teacher of history and geography and a graduate of the Sciences Po university in Paris, explains the context of the creation of al-Qaeda and the “quadruple terrorist attack of 11/9 2001 on New York and Washington”.
On page 204 he states:
“This global event – no doubt orchestrated by the CIA (secret services) to impose American influence on the Middle East? – hit the symbols of American power on its own territory.”
Although the book came out last November, it was not until the daughter of one of the school teachers bought a copy that one of them spotted the reference to the CIA and decided to demand that references to 9/11 being an inside job were scrubbed.
BBC News reports: The teacher immediately shared his concerns on a teachers’ Facebook group whose spokesman, Bruno Modica, told Le Monde “it blew up very quickly”.
“There were 122 comments; this inserted clause of his conveys a conspiracy theory you can hear in our classrooms, from some pupils’ mouths; but to find it written by a teacher and in this type of publication is unacceptable.”


newspunch--2020-01-22--French Intellectual Sentenced to Prison for Calling Mass Immigration an “Invasion”

French intellectual Renaud Camus has been given a 2 month suspended prison sentence for stating that mass immigration in Europe represents an “ invasion.
” Camus will only avoid jail by paying 1800 euros to two “ anti-racist ” organizations , SOS Racisme and the LICRA ( International League against Racism and Anti-Semitism ) .
Summit.news reports : The writer , who is the author of Le Grand Remplacement ( The Great Replacement ) , was charged with “ public incitement to hate or violence on the basis of origin , ethnicity , nationality , race or religion.
” The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Colombey-les-deux Eglises to the National Council of European Resistance in which Camus declared , “ Immigration has become an invasion.
” “ The irreversible colonization is demographic colonization , by the replacement of the population , ” said the author , adding , “ The ethnic substitution , the great replacement , is the most important event in the history of our nation since it has existed ; as with other people , if the story continues , it will not be that of France.
” Camus also called for a “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Islamization in “ the struggle for the salvation of our common civilization , Celtic , Slavic , Germanic , Greek-Latin , Judeo-Christian.
” The part of Camus ’ speech that specifically garnered the attention of judges was when he talked about European people being replaced .
Camus said mass immigration “ is the substitution , the tendency to substitute everything with its emulator , normalized , standardized , interchangeable : The original with its copy , the authentic with its imitation , the true with the false , the mothers with surrogate mothers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ entertainment.
” France suffers Islamic terror attacks on such a routine basis that it ’ s barely even an important news story anymore .
Many of those terrorists are radicalized by mosques that escape any police scrutiny , but Camus must be punished for his crime of opinion .
And there you have it .
Free speech is now a crime in France .

2.5k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
French intellectual Renaud Camus has been given a 2 month suspended prison sentence for stating that mass immigration in Europe represents an “invasion.”
Camus will only avoid jail by paying 1800 euros to two “anti-racist” organizations, SOS Racisme and the LICRA (International League against Racism and Anti-Semitism).
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Summit.news reports: The writer, who is the author of Le Grand Remplacement (The Great Replacement), was charged with “public incitement to hate or violence on the basis of origin, ethnicity, nationality, race or religion.”
The conviction stems from a November 2017 speech in Colombey-les-deux Eglises to the National Council of European Resistance in which Camus declared, “Immigration has become an invasion.”
“The irreversible colonization is demographic colonization, by the replacement of the population,” said the author, adding, “The ethnic substitution, the great replacement, is the most important event in the history of our nation since it has existed; as with other people, if the story continues, it will not be that of France.”
Camus also called for a “national consensus of resistance” to oppose Islamization in “the struggle for the salvation of our common civilization, Celtic, Slavic, Germanic, Greek-Latin, Judeo-Christian.”
The part of Camus’ speech that specifically garnered the attention of judges was when he talked about European people being replaced.
Camus said mass immigration “is the substitution, the tendency to substitute everything with its emulator, normalized, standardized, interchangeable: The original with its copy, the authentic with its imitation, the true with the false, the mothers with surrogate mothers, the culture with free time and entertainment.”
France suffers Islamic terror attacks on such a routine basis that it’s barely even an important news story anymore. Many of those terrorists are radicalized by mosques that escape any police scrutiny, but Camus must be punished for his crime of opinion.
And there you have it. Free speech is now a crime in France.


newspunch--2020-01-23--‘Straight Up Communist Censorship’: Virginia Dems Push Bill to Criminalize Free Speech

Not content with attempting to dismantle the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States , Virginia Democrats are now attempting to do away with the First Amendment too .
Despite the massive and powerful Virginia gun rights rally on Monday , Virginia Democrats are refusing to slow down their push for tyranny .
Rather they are slamming on the accelerator and hauling a bill through the legislature that will effectively criminalize forms of dissent against Governor Ralph Northam and other state government officials .
House Bill 1627 was introduced by Delegate Jeffrey M. Bourne last week .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to threats and harassment may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the victim is the Governor , Governor-elect , Lieutenant Governor , Lieutenant Governor-elect , Attorney General , or Attorney General-elect , a member or employee of the General Assembly , a justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia , or a judge of the Court of Appeals of Virginia.
” Language in the bill explicitly moves to criminalize free speech , in what would constitute a blatant attack on the First Amendment of the Constitution .
“ If any person @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intimidate , or harass any person , shall use a computer or computer network to communicate obscene , vulgar , profane , lewd , lascivious , or indecent language , or make any suggestion or proposal of an obscene nature , or threaten any illegal or immoral act , he is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor , ” the legislation reads .
The legislation will also effectively create an “ elite ruling class ” with extra legal rights compared to other citizens .
The legislation makes it clear that the above provision @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Governor-elect , Lieutenant Governor , Lieutenant Governor-elect , Attorney General , or Attorney General-elect , a member or employee of the General Assembly , a justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia , or a judge of the Court of Appeals of Virginia , ” which means this legislation effectively criminalizes dissent against public officials .
Tina Freitas , wife of Republican Delegate Nick Freitas , called attention to this tyrannical act in a Facebook post on Tuesday night .
“ Wow on cue , now they are after the 1A !
Dems @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exclusive to the Elite ruling class , to protect themselves from criticism !
” Freitas wrote .
“ What is considered harassment ?
Is Governor Infanticide/KKK Hood trying to avoid being held accountable ?
Are we no longer allowed to demand justice for the alleged rape victims of LG Fairfax ?
This is some straight up communist censorship !
” she added .
Virginia Democrats were not dissuaded by the gun rights rally on Monday in the slightest .
They moved red flag laws through the legislature just one day later , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by Republicans .
“ The governor and the leadership of the democrats have declared war on law-abiding citizens and gun owners and their votes today just confirmed that that ’ s where we ’ re going , ” said Philip Van Cleave , President of Virginia Citizens Defense League .

4.6k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
UPDATE: A previous version of this article stated that Virginia Democrats are pushing a bill through the state legislature that will effectively criminalize forms of dissent against Governor Ralph Northam and other state government officials. This is incorrect. House Bill 1627 would make changes to where certain crimes against public officials can be prosecuted, but it doesn’t create any new criminal offenses.
House Bill 1627 was introduced by Delegate Jeffrey M. Bourne last week. The legislation “provides that certain crimes relating to threats and harassment may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the victim is the Governor, Governor-elect, Lieutenant Governor, Lieutenant Governor-elect, Attorney General, or Attorney General-elect, a member or employee of the General Assembly, a justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, or a judge of the Court of Appeals of Virginia.”
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
“If any person, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass any person, shall use a computer or computer network to communicate obscene, vulgar, profane, lewd, lascivious, or indecent language, or make any suggestion or proposal of an obscene nature, or threaten any illegal or immoral act, he is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor,” the legislation reads.
Factcheck.org reports on the bill:
The bill proposes several amendments to the law that would make it so that cases of threats or harassment against certain state officials — or threats against some state-owned property — could be prosecuted in the state capital of Richmond, regardless of where such messages were sent or received. Under the current law, some of the statutes contain language that says such prosecutions can occur in locales where the communication was made or received.
Here’s what the bill proposes:


newspunch--2020-01-23--Drag Queen Admits ‘Story Hour’ Events Expose Kids to Lifestyle of ‘Nudity, Sex and Drugs’

A drag queen is speaking out against “ Drag Queen Story Hour ” events , claiming so-called “ woke ” liberal parents who allow their children to participate in such events are “ extremely irresponsible ” and run the risk of ruining their children ’ s lives .
“ What in the hell has a drag queen ever done to make you have so much respect for them , and admire them so much ?
” said drag queen Kitty Demure , who operates out of San Bernardino , CA .
“ Other than put on make-up and jump on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sexual things on stage ?
” “ I have absolutely no idea why you would want that to influence your child .
Would you want a stripper or a porn-star to influence your child ?
It makes no sense at all , ” Demure added .
Demure admitted that the drag queen lifestyle is far from wholesome , and typically involves illicit sex and drug use in nightclubs .
Individuals who participate this raunchy culture are courting intimate access to children at public libraries and liberal parents are lining up to have their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ A drag queen performs in a night club for adults .
There is a lot of filth that goes on , a lot of sexual stuff that goes on , and backstage , there ’ s a lot of nudity , sex and drugs .
Ok ?
So , I don ’ t think that this is an avenue you would want your child to explore , ” Demure said .
“ To actually get them involved in drag is extremely , extremely irresponsible on your part .
And I understand you might @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with-it , that you ’ re cool , that you ’ re woke , that you ’ re not a Nazi , that you ’ re not a homophobe — whatever it may be , but you can raise your child to be just a normal regular child without including them in gay , sexual things , ” Demure added .
Demure believes that events like drag queen story hour hurt the LGBT community by allowing perverts and creeps running a glorified grooming operation to represent them to the public .
“ Honestly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gay community any favors .
In fact , you ’ re hurting us .
We have already had a reputation for being pedophiles , and being perverts , and being deviants .
We don ’ t need you to bring your children around , ” he said .
Demure ’ s entire rant can be seen here :

2.6k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
A drag queen is speaking out against “Drag Queen Story Hour” events, claiming so-called “woke” liberal parents who allow their children to participate in such events are “extremely irresponsible” and run the risk of ruining their children’s lives.
“What in the hell has a drag queen ever done to make you have so much respect for them, and admire them so much?” said drag queen Kitty Demure, who operates out of San Bernardino, CA. “Other than put on make-up and jump on the floor and writhe around and do sexual things on stage?”
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
“I have absolutely no idea why you would want that to influence your child. Would you want a stripper or a porn-star to influence your child? It makes no sense at all,” Demure added.
Demure admitted that the drag queen lifestyle is far from wholesome, and typically involves illicit sex and drug use in nightclubs. Individuals who participate this raunchy culture are courting intimate access to children at public libraries and liberal parents are lining up to have their children mentored by drag queens.
“A drag queen performs in a night club for adults. There is a lot of filth that goes on, a lot of sexual stuff that goes on, and backstage, there’s a lot of nudity, sex and drugs. Ok? So, I don’t think that this is an avenue you would want your child to explore,” Demure said.
“To actually get them involved in drag is extremely, extremely irresponsible on your part. And I understand you might want to look like you’re with-it, that you’re cool, that you’re woke, that you’re not a Nazi, that you’re not a homophobe — whatever it may be, but you can raise your child to be just a normal regular child without including them in gay, sexual things,” Demure added.
Demure believes that events like drag queen story hour hurt the LGBT community by allowing perverts and creeps running a glorified grooming operation to represent them to the public.
“Honestly, you’re not doing the gay community any favors. In fact, you’re hurting us. We have already had a reputation for being pedophiles, and being perverts, and being deviants. We don’t need you to bring your children around,” he said.
Demure’s entire rant can be seen here:


newspunch--2020-01-23--UN Ruling Says ‘Climate Refugees’ Cannot Be Returned Back to Their Home Country

It is unlawful for governments to return so-called “ climate refugees ” back to their home countries , the United Nations has ruled .
The ruling could force the United States to allow Central Americans to enter the country against the wishes of lawmakers .
Thegatewaypundit.com reports : This will essentially open US borders for good .
Now the left has combined open borders with junk science to create climate refugees .
It is unlawful for governments to return people to countries where their lives might be threatened by the climate crisis , a landmark ruling by the United Nations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ judgment – which is the first of its kind – represents a legal “ tipping point ” and a moment that “ opens the doorway ” to future protection claims for people whose lives and wellbeing have been threatened due to global heating , experts say .
Tens of millions of people are expected to be displaced by global heating in the next decade .
The judgment relates to the case of Ioane Teitiota , a man from the Pacific nation of Kiribati , which is considered one of the countries most threatened @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for protection in New Zealand in 2013 , claiming his and his family ’ s lives were at risk .
The committee heard evidence of overcrowding on the island of South Tarawa , where Teitiota lived , saying that the population there had increased from 1,641 in 1947 to 50,000 in 2010 due to sea level rising leading to other islands becoming uninhabitable , which had led to violence and social tensions .
He also spoke of the lack of fresh water and difficulty growing crops due to salinity of the water table @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
He said that as Kiribati was predicted to be uninhabitable in 10 to 15 years , his life was endangered by remaining there.The New Zealand courts rejected Teitiota ’ s claim for protection .

1.8k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
It is unlawful for governments to return so-called “climate refugees” back to their home countries, the United Nations has ruled.
The ruling could force the United States to allow Central Americans to enter the country against the wishes of lawmakers.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Thegatewaypundit.com reports: This will essentially open US borders for good.
Now the left has combined open borders with junk science to create climate refugees.
Via The Central Tibetan Administration:
It is unlawful for governments to return people to countries where their lives might be threatened by the climate crisis, a landmark ruling by the United Nations human rights committee has found.
The judgment – which is the first of its kind – represents a legal “tipping point” and a moment that “opens the doorway” to future protection claims for people whose lives and wellbeing have been threatened due to global heating, experts say.
Tens of millions of people are expected to be displaced by global heating in the next decade.
The judgment relates to the case of Ioane Teitiota, a man from the Pacific nation of Kiribati, which is considered one of the countries most threatened by rising sea levels. He applied for protection in New Zealand in 2013, claiming his and his family’s lives were at risk.
The committee heard evidence of overcrowding on the island of South Tarawa, where Teitiota lived, saying that the population there had increased from 1,641 in 1947 to 50,000 in 2010 due to sea level rising leading to other islands becoming uninhabitable, which had led to violence and social tensions.
He also spoke of the lack of fresh water and difficulty growing crops due to salinity of the water table causing serious health issues for his family. He said that as Kiribati was predicted to be uninhabitable in 10 to 15 years, his life was endangered by remaining there.The New Zealand courts rejected Teitiota’s claim for protection.


newspunch--2020-01-23--Ukraine Whistleblower Discussed How to ‘Take out’ Trump, Report Shows

Adam Schiff ’ s “ whistleblower ” – whose complaint led to impeachment proceedings against President Trump – was allegedly overheard discussing how to “ take out ” Donald Trump in 2017 , according to a new report .
A source has come forward saying they heard the “ whistleblower ” talking about various ways to oust Trump from office after being triggered by his policies .
Dailywire.com reports : RealClearInvestigations reported Wednesday that sources overheard the CIA analyst and alleged whistleblower discussing how to remove Trump from office with fellow Obama holdover Sean Misko , who reportedly offered “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the impeachment process under Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff ( CA ) .
As noted by the outlet , there is “ strong evidence ” that the man identified in the report is the whistleblower , though he has not been officially named as such .
“ Sources told RealClearInvestigations the staffer with whom [ the alleged whistleblower ] was speaking was Sean Misko .
Both were Obama administration holdovers working in the Trump White House on foreign policy and national security issues , ” RealClearInvestigations reported Wednesday .
“ And both expressed anger @ @ @ @ @ @ @ First ’ foreign policy , a sea change from President Obama ’ s approach to international affairs.
” “ Just days after he was sworn in they were already talking about trying to get rid of him , ” a White House colleague who allegedly overheard the conversation told RealClearInvestigations .
“ They weren ’ t just bent on subverting his agenda , ” the source added .
“ They were plotting to actually have him removed from office.
” Another source said the alleged whistleblower and Misko “ didn ’ t like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” adding , “ They had a political vendetta against him from Day One.
” The outlet emphasized that the apparent discussion about Trump ’ s removal prior to the Ukrainian call “ undercuts the narrative that impeachment developed spontaneously out of the ‘ patriotism ’ of an ‘ apolitical civil servant.
’ ” The two men ’ s actions were part of a “ larger pattern of coordination to build a case for impeachment , involving Democratic leaders as well as anti-Trump figures both inside and outside of government , ” RealClearInvestigations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Obama holdovers took place during a staff-wide NSC meeting called by then-National Security Adviser Michael Flynn .
“ The ‘ all hands ’ meeting , held about two weeks into the new administration , was attended by hundreds of NSC employees , ” the report said .
“ They were popping off about how they were going to remove Trump from office .
No joke , ” an ex-colleague said .
A military staffer detailed : “ After Flynn briefed [ the staff ] about what ‘ America first ’ foreign policy means @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Misko and commented , ‘ We need to take him out.
’ And Misko replied , ‘ Yeah , we need to do everything we can to take out the president.
’ ” “ By ‘ taking him out , ’ they meant removing him from office by any means necessary .
They were triggered by Trump ’ s and Flynn ’ s vision for the world .
This was the first ‘ all hands ’ [ staff meeting ] where they got to see Trump ’ s national security team , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the briefing any time Flynn said something they didn ’ t like about ‘ America First , ’ ” the source continued , adding that the alleged whistleblower told Misko they “ can ’ t let ” Trump “ enact this foreign policy.
” “ It was so shocking that they were so blatant and outspoken about their opinion , ” the military staffer said , noting that superiors were quickly notified .
“ They weren ’ t shouting it , but they didn ’ t seem to feel the need to hide @ @ @

1.7k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Adam Schiff’s “whistleblower” – whose complaint led to impeachment proceedings against President Trump – was allegedly overheard discussing how to “take out” Donald Trump in 2017, according to a new report.
A source has come forward saying they heard the “whistleblower” talking about various ways to oust Trump from office after being triggered by his policies.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Dailywire.com reports: RealClearInvestigations reported Wednesday that sources overheard the CIA analyst and alleged whistleblower discussing how to remove Trump from office with fellow Obama holdover Sean Misko, who reportedly offered “guidance” to the alleged whistleblower during the impeachment process under Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff (CA).
As noted by the outlet, there is “strong evidence” that the man identified in the report is the whistleblower, though he has not been officially named as such.
“Sources told RealClearInvestigations the staffer with whom [the alleged whistleblower] was speaking was Sean Misko. Both were Obama administration holdovers working in the Trump White House on foreign policy and national security issues,” RealClearInvestigations reported Wednesday. “And both expressed anger over Trump’s new ‘America First’ foreign policy, a sea change from President Obama’s approach to international affairs.”
“Just days after he was sworn in they were already talking about trying to get rid of him,” a White House colleague who allegedly overheard the conversation told RealClearInvestigations.
“They weren’t just bent on subverting his agenda,” the source added. “They were plotting to actually have him removed from office.”
Another source said the alleged whistleblower and Misko “didn’t like” Trump’s “policies,” adding, “They had a political vendetta against him from Day One.”
The outlet emphasized that the apparent discussion about Trump’s removal prior to the Ukrainian call “undercuts the narrative that impeachment developed spontaneously out of the ‘patriotism’ of an ‘apolitical civil servant.’”
The two men’s actions were part of a “larger pattern of coordination to build a case for impeachment, involving Democratic leaders as well as anti-Trump figures both inside and outside of government,” RealClearInvestigations said.
The conversation between the two Obama holdovers took place during a staff-wide NSC meeting called by then-National Security Adviser Michael Flynn. “The ‘all hands’ meeting, held about two weeks into the new administration, was attended by hundreds of NSC employees,” the report said.
“They were popping off about how they were going to remove Trump from office. No joke,” an ex-colleague said.
A military staffer detailed: “After Flynn briefed [the staff] about what ‘America first’ foreign policy means, [the alleged whistleblower] turned to Misko and commented, ‘We need to take him out.’ And Misko replied, ‘Yeah, we need to do everything we can to take out the president.’”
“By ‘taking him out,’ they meant removing him from office by any means necessary. They were triggered by Trump’s and Flynn’s vision for the world. This was the first ‘all hands’ [staff meeting] where they got to see Trump’s national security team, and they were huffing and puffing throughout the briefing any time Flynn said something they didn’t like about ‘America First,’” the source continued, adding that the alleged whistleblower told Misko they “can’t let” Trump “enact this foreign policy.”
“It was so shocking that they were so blatant and outspoken about their opinion,” the military staffer said, noting that superiors were quickly notified. “They weren’t shouting it, but they didn’t seem to feel the need to hide it.”


newspunch--2020-01-23--Taylor Swift Vows to Turn Millions of Fans Against ‘Sinister’ Republicans

Trump-hating pop princess Taylor Swift has vowed to use her music to turn millions of fans against “ sinister ” Republicans and get them to vote for Democrat candidates instead .
After getting political in the 2018 midterm elections , the far-left singer says she wants to “ stoke fires politically ” for the upcoming elections .
In an interview with Variety published Tuesday , Swift explains that dipping her toes into Trump-bashing politics helped shape her new song , “ Only the Young.
” Breitbart.com reports : The Grammy-winner also took aim at conservative politicians during the interview , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ sinister ” and “ so dark.
” Swift specifically criticized Republican politicians for their stance on policies like the Employment Non-Discrimination Act .
“ When you ’ re saying that certain people can be kicked out of a restaurant because of who they love or how they identify , and these are actual policies that certain politicians vocally stand behind , and they disguise them as family values , that is sinister .
So , so dark , ” the singer said .
“ I was really upset about Tennessee going the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And so I just wanted to write a song about it , ” Swift told Variety .
“ I didn ’ t know where it would end up .
But I did think that it would be better for it to come out at a time that it could maybe hopefully stoke some fires politically and maybe engage younger people to form their own views , break away from the pack , and not feel like they need to vote exactly the same way that people in their town are voting.
” Variety @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is heard over the end credits of the Netflix documentary .
The song reportedly features lyrics that reference the 2018 midterms : “ You did all that you could do / The game was rigged , the ref got tricked / The wrong ones think they ’ re right / We were outnumbered — this time.
” Taylor Swift told the trade publication that “ Only the Young ” probably won ’ t be released as a single .
“ I don ’ t see it as a single , ” Swift said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a song that goes with this film .
I don ’ t see it as a ‘ let ’ s go make a music video and try to see what this does at radio ’ single.
” For years , Swift declined to talk about her political beliefs .
But the singer has since become a vocal supporter of the Democrat Party , using her vast social media following to promote Democrat candidates and lash out at conservatives .
In 2018 , she published a statement on Instagram in which she criticized Republican @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her race for the U.S. Senate .
The statement is at the center of a sequence in Miss Americana that shows Swift arguing with her father and business associates .
“ For 12 years , we ’ ve not got involved in politics or religion , ” an unnamed associate says in the documentary , according to Variety .
The singer ’ s father reportedly says , “ I ’ ve read the entire [ statement ] and … right now , I ’ m terrified .
I ’ m the guy that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Despite the backlash , Swift told Variety that she wants to remain politically outspoken .
“ Using my voice to try to advocate was the only choice to make .
Because I ’ ve talked about equality and sung about it in songs … but we are at a point where human rights are being violated , ” she said .

3.8k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Trump-hating pop princess Taylor Swift has vowed to use her music to turn millions of fans against “sinister” Republicans and get them to vote for Democrat candidates instead.
After getting political in the 2018 midterm elections, the far-left singer says she wants to “stoke fires politically” for the upcoming elections.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
In an interview with Variety published Tuesday, Swift explains that dipping her toes into Trump-bashing politics helped shape her new song, “Only the Young.”
Breitbart.com reports: The Grammy-winner also took aim at conservative politicians during the interview, describing their stances on certain policies as “sinister” and “so dark.”
Swift specifically criticized Republican politicians for their stance on policies like the Employment Non-Discrimination Act.
“When you’re saying that certain people can be kicked out of a restaurant because of who they love or how they identify, and these are actual policies that certain politicians vocally stand behind, and they disguise them as family values, that is sinister. So, so dark,” the singer said.
https://www.instagram.com/p/BopoXpYnCes/?utm_source=ig_embed
https://www.instagram.com/p/BpkN7A-FN0B/?utm_source=ig_embed
“I was really upset about Tennessee going the way that it did, obviously. And so I just wanted to write a song about it,” Swift told Variety.
“I didn’t know where it would end up. But I did think that it would be better for it to come out at a time that it could maybe hopefully stoke some fires politically and maybe engage younger people to form their own views, break away from the pack, and not feel like they need to vote exactly the same way that people in their town are voting.”
Variety reported that Swift’s new song is heard over the end credits of the Netflix documentary.
The song reportedly features lyrics that reference the 2018 midterms: “You did all that you could do / The game was rigged, the ref got tricked / The wrong ones think they’re right / We were outnumbered — this time.”
Taylor Swift told the trade publication that “Only the Young” probably won’t be released as a single.
“I don’t see it as a single,” Swift said. “I just see it as a song that goes with this film. I don’t see it as a ‘let’s go make a music video and try to see what this does at radio’ single.”
For years, Swift declined to talk about her political beliefs. But the singer has since become a vocal supporter of the Democrat Party, using her vast social media following to promote Democrat candidates and lash out at conservatives.
In 2018, she published a statement on Instagram in which she criticized Republican Marsha Blackburn, who would eventually win her race for the U.S. Senate.
The statement is at the center of a sequence in Miss Americana that shows Swift arguing with her father and business associates.
“For 12 years, we’ve not got involved in politics or religion,” an unnamed associate says in the documentary, according to Variety.
The singer’s father reportedly says, “I’ve read the entire [statement] and … right now, I’m terrified. I’m the guy that went out and bought armored cars.”
Despite the backlash, Swift told Variety that she wants to remain politically outspoken.
“Using my voice to try to advocate was the only choice to make. Because I’ve talked about equality and sung about it in songs … but we are at a point where human rights are being violated,” she said.


newspunch--2020-01-23--Transgender MMA Fighter Who Broke Woman’s Skull Named ‘Bravest Athlete in History’

MMA Fighter Fallon Fox twice broke an opponent ’ s skull to win matches and is now being hailed as the “ bravest athlete in history ” by some in the LGBT community .
Outsports , a sports news website , gave Fox the “ bravest athlete in history ” title in a recent article written by Cyd Zeigler .
Fox , who is a biological man who fights female opponents , qualifies as “ brave ” because , according to Zeigler , “ she was the target of a torrent of hatred I have literally never seen targeting an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intense as the “ hatred ” Fox may have been subjected to , it ’ s highly unlikely that the social media comments directed his way ever fractured his skull .
The title of bravest athlete would have been much more appropriately bestowed on the biological females who dared to enter the cage with a fighter they had no hope of matching in terms of power and athletic ability .
The Post Millennial posted a commentary on Fox and the women he was in the ring with : Fox , a male to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a Coral Gables , FL , MMA fight during which she “ secured a grip on Newsome ’ s head… With her hands gripping the back of Newsome ’ s skull , she delivered a massive knee , bringing her leg up while pulling her opponent ’ s head down .
The blow landed on Newsome ’ s chin and dropped her , unconscious , face-first on the mat.
” That was Newsome ’ s last pro fight .
But to Outsports , a male-bodied person beating a female bodied person unconscious @ @ @ @ @ @ @ beat up women in the ring , won every match but one , but has weathered online attacks from the likes of Joe Rogan .
I think we can all agree that getting back online after Joe Rogan has knocked you down is far braver than facing another male-bodied of your own muscle mass and size in a fight .
Fox also beat Tamikka Brents , giving her a concussion and breaking 7 orbital bones .
But that ’ s super brave , too , taking an unfair , male-bodied advantage and using @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Vice also defended Fox in its account of his career : “ Fallon was born with a peen .
No one ’ s perfect .
I throw away too much salad .
She was raised as a dude , as I am told is traditional in Ohio for babies born with outwardly expressive genitalia .
But that peen never did sit right with her and , since 2008 , she has been a woman in mind , body , and soul.
” Brents was not told that Fox was trans before she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Post Millennial reported .
“ I ’ ve fought a lot of women and have never felt the strength that I felt in a fight as I did that night , ” Brents said , recounting her experience fighting Fox .
“ I can ’ t answer whether it ’ s because she was born a man or not because I ’ m not a doctor .
I can only say , I ’ ve never felt so overpowered ever in my life and I am an abnormally strong female in my @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fighting .
Any other job or career I say have a go at it , but when it comes to a combat sport I think it just isn ’ t fair.
” The Post Millennial report notes that the International Olympic Committee said that it would take treatment for one year prior to competition to level the playing field between transgender men competing against females and females would need “ years of hormones ” to gain some male advantages .
“ There are no cohesive federal laws in the U.S. to determine what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ women , and while males have won women ’ s championships , female-bodied athletes have not risen to the upper levels of male competition , ” the website reported .
Fox told Outsports : “ My teammates had no idea I was trans .
They recognized my endurance , my strength , my ability to cut weight in the same category as cisgender women .
There was no idea in their minds that I didn ’ t belong .
They weren ’ t thinking , ‘ oh my God , she ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @

9k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
MMA Fighter Fallon Fox twice broke an opponent’s skull to win matches and is now being hailed as the “bravest athlete in history” by some in the LGBT community.
Outsports, a sports news website, gave Fox the “bravest athlete in history” title in a recent article written by Cyd Zeigler.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Fox, who is a biological man who fights female opponents, qualifies as “brave” because, according to Zeigler, “she was the target of a torrent of hatred I have literally never seen targeting an LGBTQ athlete.”
Breitbart.com reports: As intense as the “hatred” Fox may have been subjected to, it’s highly unlikely that the social media comments directed his way ever fractured his skull. The title of bravest athlete would have been much more appropriately bestowed on the biological females who dared to enter the cage with a fighter they had no hope of matching in terms of power and athletic ability.
The Post Millennial posted a commentary on Fox and the women he was in the ring with:
Fox, a male to female transgender athlete, destroyed Erika Newsome in a Coral Gables, FL, MMA fight during which she “secured a grip on Newsome’s head… With her hands gripping the back of Newsome’s skull, she delivered a massive knee, bringing her leg up while pulling her opponent’s head down. The blow landed on Newsome’s chin and dropped her, unconscious, face-first on the mat.” That was Newsome’s last pro fight. But to Outsports, a male-bodied person beating a female bodied person unconscious constitutes bravery. Not only has Fox beat up women in the ring, won every match but one, but has weathered online attacks from the likes of Joe Rogan. I think we can all agree that getting back online after Joe Rogan has knocked you down is far braver than facing another male-bodied of your own muscle mass and size in a fight. Fox also beat Tamikka Brents, giving her a concussion and breaking 7 orbital bones. But that’s super brave, too, taking an unfair, male-bodied advantage and using it to give female-bodied opponents brain injuries.
Vice also defended Fox in its account of his career: “Fallon was born with a peen. No one’s perfect. I throw away too much salad. She was raised as a dude, as I am told is traditional in Ohio for babies born with outwardly expressive genitalia. But that peen never did sit right with her and, since 2008, she has been a woman in mind, body, and soul.”
Brents was not told that Fox was trans before she was in the ring with him, the Post Millennial reported.
“I’ve fought a lot of women and have never felt the strength that I felt in a fight as I did that night,” Brents said, recounting her experience fighting Fox. “I can’t answer whether it’s because she was born a man or not because I’m not a doctor. I can only say, I’ve never felt so overpowered ever in my life and I am an abnormally strong female in my own right… I still disagree with Fox fighting. Any other job or career I say have a go at it, but when it comes to a combat sport I think it just isn’t fair.”
The Post Millennial report notes that the International Olympic Committee said that it would take treatment for one year prior to competition to level the playing field between transgender men competing against females and females would need “years of hormones” to gain some male advantages.
“There are no cohesive federal laws in the U.S. to determine what makes a male eligible to compete against women, and while males have won women’s championships, female-bodied athletes have not risen to the upper levels of male competition,” the website reported.
Fox told Outsports: “My teammates had no idea I was trans. They recognized my endurance, my strength, my ability to cut weight in the same category as cisgender women. There was no idea in their minds that I didn’t belong. They weren’t thinking, ‘oh my God, she’s going to kill somebody.’”


newspunch--2020-01-23--Tulsi Gabbard Sues Malicious Liar Hillary Clinton for $50 Million

Democratic presidential nominee Tulsi Gabbard has filed a $ 50 million defamation lawsuit against Hillary Clinton for spreading malicious lies @ @ @ @ @ Russia .
Twice-failed presidential candidate Clinton called Gabbard a “ Russian asset ” during an @ @ @ @ @ podcast .
Despite her claim having absolutely no merit , the former Secretary of State @ @ @ @ @ statement .
Gabbard was asked about Clinton ’ s false statement during a town hall @ @ @ @ @ New Hampshire on Wednesday evening .
“ I will not stand quietly by as Hillary @ @ @ @ @ to smear my character and my loyalty and dedication to serving our country , ” @ @ @ @ @ a clip of the event .
“ I ’ ve filed a lawsuit against her @ @ @ @ @ Gabbard announced .
“ I hold her accountable.
” A Clinton spokesperson did not comment @ @ @ @ @ ’ s Manhattan federal lawsuit .

1.9k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Democratic presidential nominee Tulsi Gabbard has filed a $50 million defamation lawsuit against Hillary Clinton for spreading malicious lies about her non-existent ties to Russia.
Twice-failed presidential candidate Clinton called Gabbard a “Russian asset” during an Oct. 17 appearance on a podcast. Despite her claim having absolutely no merit, the former Secretary of State has refused to retract her statement.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Gabbard was asked about Clinton’s false statement during a town hall campaign event in Charlestown, New Hampshire on Wednesday evening.
“I’m a patriot, I love our country,” Gabbard said.
“I will not stand quietly by as Hillary Clinton or anyone else tries to smear my character and my loyalty and dedication to serving our country,” she declared, according to a clip of the event.
“I’ve filed a lawsuit against her for that defamation,” Gabbard announced. “I hold her accountable.”
A Clinton spokesperson did not comment to The Post on Gabbard’s Manhattan federal lawsuit.


newspunch--2020-01-23--President Trump Takes On Greta Thunberg In Davos

In what was seen as an attack on teen climate activist Greta Thunberg , US President Donald Trump lashed out @ @ @ @ @ and “ prophets of doom ” on the opening day of the World Economic Forum @ @ @ @ @ it is a “ time for optimism ” and said he was a “ big @ @ @ @ @ Thunberg responded by demanding immediate action saying Trump ’ s climate pledge was “ nowhere @ @ @ @ @ reports : The two heavyweights of the environmental debate brought their divergent views with them @ @ @ @ @ Trump that the world isn ’ t about to burst into flames , and the @ @ @ @ @ it has already reached boiling point .
ICYMI ’ s Rite On takes a look @ @ @ @ @

In what was seen as an attack on teen climate activist Greta Thunberg, US President Donald Trump lashed out at environmental “alarmists” and “prophets of doom” on the opening day of the World Economic Forum at Davos.
Climate showdown at Davos
Trump said it is a “time for optimism” and said he was a “big believer in the environment”
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Thunberg responded by demanding immediate action saying Trump’s climate pledge was “nowhere near enough”.
RT reports: The two heavyweights of the environmental debate brought their divergent views with them: the suspicious optimism of Trump that the world isn’t about to burst into flames, and the apocalyptic warnings of Greta that it has already reached boiling point.
ICYMI’s Rite On takes a look at the two messages.


newspunch--2020-01-24--Soros Attacks Trump: We Must Ensure ‘Narcissist’ POTUS Is Defeated in 2020

Far-left billionaire George Soros attacked “ narcissist ” President Trump at Davos on Thursday , saying the U.S. President needs to be ousted from office for the greater good of the world .
Speaking at a private dinner event at the World Economic Forum in Davos , Switzerland , Soros said the “ fate of the world ” will be decided this coming November .
The powerful 89-year-old accused the president of being a “ con man ” and a “ narcissist ” who wants the world to “ revolve around him , ” according to CNBC .
“ When @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reality , ” his ego swelled , Soros told attendees , adding : “ This has turned his narcissism into a malignant disease.
” Breitbart.com reports : Soros , who has yet to endorse a 2020 Democrat candidate , then said that this year ’ s election will decide the “ fate of the world , ” CNBC reports .
In October , the billionaire argued White House contender Sen. Elizabeth Warren ( D-MA ) is the “ most qualified to be president , ” but stopped short of formally throwing his support @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , is not the first time the hedge fund manager has taken aim at President Trump at the World Economic Forum .
Last year , Soros criticized the president ’ s negotiating style against China , which culminated in the signing of a phase one trade agreement last Wednesday .
“ Regrettably , President Trump seems to be following a different course : Make concessions to China and declare victory while renewing his attacks on U.S. allies , ” Soros said at the time .
“ This is liable to undermine the U.S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ abuses and excesses.
” At this year ’ s event , Soros also lambasted Chinese Communist Party leader Xi Jinping for his government ’ s use of a totalitarian social credit scoring system on Chinese citizens .
Xi is using “ artificial intelligence to have total control of his people , ” Soros warned .
He also mused that China ’ s president is “ trying to exploit ” President Trump on trade .
These remarks follow President Trump ’ s speech before the World Economic Forum , in which he touted his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for global prosperity .
“ A nation ’ s highest duty is to its own citizens , ” the president told attendees .
“ Honoring this truth is the only way to build faith and confidence in the market system .
Only when governments put their own people first will people be fully invested in their national futures.
” “ A pro-worker , pro-citizen , pro-family agenda demonstrates how a nation can thrive when its communities , its companies , its government work together for the good of the whole nation , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the speech to reject climate alarmism , which loomed large over this year ’ s event , partly due to teen climate activist Greta Thunberg ’ s attendance .
“ These alarmists always demand the same thing – absolute power to dominate , transform , and control every aspect of our lives , ” the president stated .
“ We ’ re committed to conserving the majesty of God ’ s creation and the natural beauty of our world .
”

5.3k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Far-left billionaire George Soros attacked “narcissist” President Trump at Davos on Thursday, saying the U.S. President needs to be ousted from office for the greater good of the world.
Speaking at a private dinner event at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Soros said the “fate of the world” will be decided this coming November.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
The powerful 89-year-old accused the president of being a “con man” and a “narcissist” who wants the world to “revolve around him,” according to CNBC.
“When his fantasy of becoming president became a reality,” his ego swelled, Soros told attendees, adding: “This has turned his narcissism into a malignant disease.”
Breitbart.com reports: Soros, who has yet to endorse a 2020 Democrat candidate, then said that this year’s election will decide the “fate of the world,” CNBC reports. In October, the billionaire argued White House contender Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) is the “most qualified to be president,” but stopped short of formally throwing his support behind her.
This, of course, is not the first time the hedge fund manager has taken aim at President Trump at the World Economic Forum. Last year, Soros criticized the president’s negotiating style against China, which culminated in the signing of a phase one trade agreement last Wednesday.
“Regrettably, President Trump seems to be following a different course: Make concessions to China and declare victory while renewing his attacks on U.S. allies,” Soros said at the time. “This is liable to undermine the U.S. policy objective of curbing China’s abuses and excesses.”
At this year’s event, Soros also lambasted Chinese Communist Party leader Xi Jinping for his government’s use of a totalitarian social credit scoring system on Chinese citizens. Xi is using “artificial intelligence to have total control of his people,” Soros warned. He also mused that China’s president is “trying to exploit” President Trump on trade.
These remarks follow President Trump’s speech before the World Economic Forum, in which he touted his America First economic policies as a model for global prosperity.
“A nation’s highest duty is to its own citizens,” the president told attendees. “Honoring this truth is the only way to build faith and confidence in the market system. Only when governments put their own people first will people be fully invested in their national futures.”
“A pro-worker, pro-citizen, pro-family agenda demonstrates how a nation can thrive when its communities, its companies, its government work together for the good of the whole nation,” he added.
President Trump also used the speech to reject climate alarmism, which loomed large over this year’s event, partly due to teen climate activist Greta Thunberg’s attendance.
“These alarmists always demand the same thing – absolute power to dominate, transform, and control every aspect of our lives,” the president stated. “We’re committed to conserving the majesty of God’s creation and the natural beauty of our world.”


newspunch--2020-01-24--Mueller’s Convictions in Question After FISA Court Admits Warrants Against Carter Page Were ‘NOT Val

Mueller’s Convictions in Question After FISA Court Admits Warrants Against Carter Page Were ‘NOT Valid’

At least two of the spy warrants against Carter Page were not lawfully authorized , the FISC [ Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court ] admitted in a secret order .
Presiding FISA judge James Boasberg wrote in a January 7 order which was not declassified and released until Thursday , that the last two FISA warrants on Carter Page dated April 7 , 2017 and June 29 , 2017 were invalid .
Thegatewaypundit.com reports : The June 2017 FISA warrant was signed by former DAG Rod Rosenstein and Former Deputy Director of the FBI Andrew McCabe .
Rosenstein signed the June @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wrote the memo authorizing the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller — and 20 pages of this FISA application are STILL REDACTED .
Did Robert Mueller actually use information gathered in real time by the illegal wiretaps on Carter Page ?
If so , this could pose a huge problem for Mueller ’ s cases against Trump officials because the wiretaps are now officially invalid .
“ The final three-month authorization to spy on Page was signed nearly six weeks after Mueller was appointed , meaning that Mueller may have had real-time access @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of surveillance of Page during the course of Mueller ’ s investigation .
If his office used any of the information in subsequent cases , the declaration that the final two spy warrants against Page were invalid could potentially nullify previous or future convictions sought by Mueller ’ s office , ” Sean Davis of The Federalist wrote .
Judge James Boasberg , the current federal judge presiding over the FISA court , wrote in his order that at least two of the four FISA applications against Carter Page were unlawfully authorized .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Department of Justice similarly concluded following the release of a sprawling investigate report on the matter by the agency ’ s inspector general that the government did not have probable cause that Page was acting as an agent of a foreign power .
The FISA law states that American citizens can not be secretly spied on by the U.S. government absent probable cause , based on valid evidence , that an American is unlawfully acting as a foreign agent .
In his January 7 order , Boasberg directed DOJ to retain and sequester @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Carter Page applications , the inspector general investigation of FISA abuse , and any additional DOJ investigations related to or spawned by the inspector general ’ s report .
Boasberg told DOJ to provide all of the required information to the FISA court no later than January 28 .
“ DOJ assesses that with respect to the applications in Docket Numbers 17-375 and 17-679 , ‘ if not earlier , there was insufficient predication to establish probable cause to believe that [ Carter ] Page was acting as an agent of a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , referring to the final two of the four FISA applications to spy on Page .
“ The Court understands the government to have concluded , in view of the material misstatements and omissions , that the Court ’ s authorizations in Docket Numbers 17-375 and 17-679 were not valid.
” According to Boasberg , the DOJ is still assessing whether the first two FISA warrants on Carter Page were also obtained illegally .
The first FISA warrant on Carter Page was obtained in October of 2016 and second warrant was obtained in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in his order that it is a federal crime for any federal official to “ intentionally…disclose [ ] or use [ ] information obtained under color of law by electronic surveillance , knowing or having any reason to know that the information was obtained through electronic surveillance not authorized ” by law .

1.7k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
At least two of the spy warrants against Carter Page were not lawfully authorized, the FISC [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court] admitted in a secret order.
Presiding FISA judge James Boasberg wrote in a January 7 order which was not declassified and released until Thursday, that the last two FISA warrants on Carter Page dated April 7, 2017 and June 29, 2017 were invalid.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Thegatewaypundit.com reports: The June 2017 FISA warrant was signed by former DAG Rod Rosenstein and Former Deputy Director of the FBI Andrew McCabe.
Rosenstein signed the June 2017 FISA warrant a month after he wrote the memo authorizing the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller — and 20 pages of this FISA application are STILL REDACTED.
Did Robert Mueller actually use information gathered in real time by the illegal wiretaps on Carter Page?
If so, this could pose a huge problem for Mueller’s cases against Trump officials because the wiretaps are now officially invalid.
“The final three-month authorization to spy on Page was signed nearly six weeks after Mueller was appointed, meaning that Mueller may have had real-time access to and utilized nearly five months worth of surveillance of Page during the course of Mueller’s investigation. If his office used any of the information in subsequent cases, the declaration that the final two spy warrants against Page were invalid could potentially nullify previous or future convictions sought by Mueller’s office,” Sean Davis of The Federalist wrote.
The Federalist reported:
Judge James Boasberg, the current federal judge presiding over the FISA court, wrote in his order that at least two of the four FISA applications against Carter Page were unlawfully authorized. Additionally, according his order, the Department of Justice similarly concluded following the release of a sprawling investigate report on the matter by the agency’s inspector general that the government did not have probable cause that Page was acting as an agent of a foreign power. The FISA law states that American citizens cannot be secretly spied on by the U.S. government absent probable cause, based on valid evidence, that an American is unlawfully acting as a foreign agent. In his January 7 order, Boasberg directed DOJ to retain and sequester all information and evidence relevant to both the Carter Page applications, the inspector general investigation of FISA abuse, and any additional DOJ investigations related to or spawned by the inspector general’s report. Boasberg told DOJ to provide all of the required information to the FISA court no later than January 28. “DOJ assesses that with respect to the applications in Docket Numbers 17-375 and 17-679, ‘if not earlier, there was insufficient predication to establish probable cause to believe that [Carter] Page was acting as an agent of a foreign power,’” Boasberg wrote, referring to the final two of the four FISA applications to spy on Page. “The Court understands the government to have concluded, in view of the material misstatements and omissions, that the Court’s authorizations in Docket Numbers 17-375 and 17-679 were not valid.”
According to Boasberg, the DOJ is still assessing whether the first two FISA warrants on Carter Page were also obtained illegally.
The first FISA warrant on Carter Page was obtained in October of 2016 and second warrant was obtained in January of 2017.
Boasberg also said in his order that it is a federal crime for any federal official to “intentionally…disclose[] or use[] information obtained under color of law by electronic surveillance, knowing or having any reason to know that the information was obtained through electronic surveillance not authorized” by law.


newspunch--2020-01-24--Pencil-Neck: Case Against President Trump ‘Cannot Be Decided at the Ballot Box’

Impeachment manager Adam Schiff has warned President Trump ’ s alleged misconduct can not be decided at the ballot box @ @ @ @ @ Democrat-led impeachment .
The House Judiciary Chairman made the remarks during his opening statement on @ @ @ @ @ remedied by his conviction in the Senate and removal from office , President Trump ’ @ @ @ @ @ and obstruction of Congress will permanently alter the balance of power among the branches of @ @ @ @ @ said .
The California Democrat baselessly accused POTUS of attempting to “ use the powers @ @ @ @ @ in an election.
” “ For precisely this reason , the president ’ s misconduct @ @ @ @ @ the ballot box , for we can not be assured that the vote will be @ @ @ @ @ said .
“ The president has shown he believes he is above the law and @ @ @ @ @ he added .

1.1k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Impeachment manager Adam Schiff has warned President Trump’s alleged misconduct cannot be decided at the ballot box, but only through the Democrat-led impeachment.
The House Judiciary Chairman made the remarks during his opening statement on Wednesday.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
“If not remedied by his conviction in the Senate and removal from office, President Trump’s abuse of his office and obstruction of Congress will permanently alter the balance of power among the branches of government,” the congressman said.
The California Democrat baselessly accused POTUS of attempting to “use the powers of the presidency to cheat in an election.”
“For precisely this reason, the president’s misconduct cannot be decided at the ballot box, for we cannot be assured that the vote will be fairly won,” Schiff said.
“The president has shown he believes he is above the law and scornful of constraint,” he added.