newspunch--2020-12-10--‘Transgender’ Child Stuns Liberals Into Silence: “It Ruined My Life!”

Avery , a male who lives his life as a girl , blasted his far-left activist mother in an upcoming pro-transgender documentary entitled “ Transhood.
” However , at least one scene should serve as a warning to any parent thinking of allowing their child to transition .
“ Filmed over five years in Kansas City , ‘ Transhood ’ chronicles the lives of four young people ( aged 4 , 7 , 12 , and 15 at the start of filming ) and their families as they navigate growing up transgender in America ’ s heartland.
” “ By @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is reshaping their lives , the film explores how these families struggle and stumble through parenting , and how the kids are challenged and transformed as they experience the complexity of their identities.
“ “ Directed by Sharon Liese , produced by Sasha Alpert ( Autism : The Musical ) , and executive-produced by Kimberly Reed , ‘ Transhood ’ offers a long-range understanding of transgender youth through the nuanced and authentic stories of Jay , Avery , Leena , and Phoenix.
“ “ While every journey is different , these families share @ @ @ @ @ @ @ young people display incredible resilience , facing rejection from their peers and escalating political rhetoric that strives to invalidate LGBTQ+ lives .
All the while , the older kids navigate the minefield of adolescence .
“ “ Sharing their most vulnerable moments , the parents reveal their ambivalence , doubts , and missteps as they themselves transform over time.
” Westernjournal.com reports : I find myself angered by the “ trans ” community ’ s continual push to normalize the sexualization of children .
Children are not sexual objects , nor should they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ featured in this film are ages 4 , 7 , 12 , and 15 !
Three of the children are far too young even to begin to think about sex or what gender they are .
I am a libertarian , and with that being said , I believe that a consenting adult should be able to do whatever he or she chooses with their own body .
Children , on the other hand , do not have fully developed brains and are not capable of making such a life-altering decision .
I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ political left could think that having children live as the opposite gender and brainwashing them to believe they are anything besides what they were born isn ’ t child abuse !
The human brain is not fully developed until around the age of 25 , according to the University of Rochester Medical Center , so why would any reasonable human being think that is OK to have a child born male live as a female ?
How is this not considered brainwashing ?
If a Christian couple had a son who came out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ response was to send him to a so-called “ straight camp , ” the establishment media and their progressive allies would have a field day plastering the couple ’ s faces nationwide , branding them as bigots and homophobes .
Why is encouraging children to be transgender not held to the same standard ?
What I have seen in the film leads me to believe that these kids are being exploited as political props for an agenda to normalize transgenderism as a whole .
“ I just don ’ t want to even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ done too much in this .
It ’ s ruined my life , and now everyone in this world is going to know .
If I sell my book , it ’ s going to be on the news along with me for like the 50th time at this point , and it ’ s just going to make my life worse , ” Avery says .
“ A couple of years ago , you wanted people to know , ” Avery ’ s mom says , completely dismissing his dissatisfaction with his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Yeah , I did , but that was a really stupid silly mistake , and now I don ’ t. ” Of course , most parents of teenagers have heard the “ you ’ ve ruined my life ” line .
Avery , though , likely likely has better cause than most , even if his parents have since allowed him to step out of the spotlight .
An interview that Popsugar conducted last month with Avery ’ s mom , Debi , revealed that “ Avery became concerned with how open @ @ @ @ @ @ @ She would hear me talking to my husband and ask , ‘ Why are you having to go and tell so many people about trans kids , Mom ?
’ I responded , ‘ Well , because I ’ m working with another school because that school isn ’ t supporting a student , and I want that kid to have a chance , ’ ” the mother said .
“ I think a lot of that is what made her decide that she didn ’ t want to be so public at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chance to be a kid , so that was another part of the evolution that I appreciate.
” “ Even now , I ask her , ‘ Do you ever think you ’ ll be public again ?
’ and she said , ‘ I don ’ t know , but if I do , I want [ my advocacy work ] to be on my terms , and I don ’ t necessarily want it to be about trans people .
There are other people hurting .
My friends who have a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being discriminated against .
There are kids in cages at the border .
Why aren ’ t we talking about that anymore ?
Why is that suddenly not on the news , Mom ?
I know it ’ s still happening , ’ ” Debi said .
It ’ s a good thing that Avery has opted “ to take a step back from the spotlight , ” as Popsugar put it , though it ’ s still horribly sad that this confused young boy is still pretending to be a girl — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In any case , this appears to be a horrible case of child exploitation in the name of a political agenda that should make anyone who cares about personal liberty sick .
“ Transhood ” is not about protecting or advancing the rights of the transgender community but is yet another push by people who lack any sort of moral values to make child exploitation acceptable as long as it ’ s veiled under social justice .
A second segment posted to Twitter by Walsh shines a light on just how far @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to push a new sexual identity onto their children .
In this clip , you see a mother reading a transgender children ’ s book titled “ Jacob ’ s New Dress ” to her 4-year-old son , Phoenix .
The book talks about a boy who made himself a dress and asserts the nonsensical notion that there are all sorts of ways to be a boy .
“ You ’ re a rainbow , ” she replies .
The child also insists that he is wearing girl clothes only to be corrected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your clothes , so they are boy clothes.
” This documentary glorifies child exploitation and indoctrination in the name of acceptance and tolerance .
Child exploitation has nothing to do with LGBT rights .
Anyone who would try to equate the two issues is either lying or delusional .
The United States was founded on the ideals that every individual deserves to be free — and that includes children who are being abused and indoctrinated by their parents about sexual identity long before they should even be thinking of the words .

593 SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
A young “transgender” child went off-script during the recent filming of a new documentary, warning liberals that switching genders has “ruined my life.”
Avery, a male who lives his life as a girl, blasted his far-left activist mother in an upcoming pro-transgender documentary entitled “Transhood.”
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
The film follows the story of four children in Kansas City who have been forced into the spotlight as role models for the transgender community. JOIN THE FIGHT: BECOME A CITIZEN JOURNALIST TODAY!
However, at least one scene should serve as a warning to any parent thinking of allowing their child to transition.
Here’s how HBO describes the film:
“Filmed over five years in Kansas City, ‘Transhood’ chronicles the lives of four young people (aged 4, 7, 12, and 15 at the start of filming) and their families as they navigate growing up transgender in America’s heartland.”
“By sharing personal realities of how gender expression is reshaping their lives, the film explores how these families struggle and stumble through parenting, and how the kids are challenged and transformed as they experience the complexity of their identities.“
“Directed by Sharon Liese, produced by Sasha Alpert (Autism: The Musical), and executive-produced by Kimberly Reed, ‘Transhood’ offers a long-range understanding of transgender youth through the nuanced and authentic stories of Jay, Avery, Leena, and Phoenix.“
“While every journey is different, these families share their honest and varied experiences as the young people display incredible resilience, facing rejection from their peers and escalating political rhetoric that strives to invalidate LGBTQ+ lives. All the while, the older kids navigate the minefield of adolescence. “
“Sharing their most vulnerable moments, the parents reveal their ambivalence, doubts, and missteps as they themselves transform over time.”
TRAILER:
Westernjournal.com reports: I find myself angered by the “trans” community’s continual push to normalize the sexualization of children. Children are not sexual objects, nor should they be treated as such. The children featured in this film are ages 4, 7, 12, and 15! Three of the children are far too young even to begin to think about sex or what gender they are. I am a libertarian, and with that being said, I believe that a consenting adult should be able to do whatever he or she chooses with their own body.
Children, on the other hand, do not have fully developed brains and are not capable of making such a life-altering decision. I do not understand how anyone on the political left could think that having children live as the opposite gender and brainwashing them to believe they are anything besides what they were born isn’t child abuse!
The human brain is not fully developed until around the age of 25, according to the University of Rochester Medical Center, so why would any reasonable human being think that is OK to have a child born male live as a female? How is this not considered brainwashing?
If a Christian couple had a son who came out as a homosexual and the parents’ response was to send him to a so-called “straight camp,” the establishment media and their progressive allies would have a field day plastering the couple’s faces nationwide, branding them as bigots and homophobes. Why is encouraging children to be transgender not held to the same standard?
What I have seen in the film leads me to believe that these kids are being exploited as political props for an agenda to normalize transgenderism as a whole.
In a film segment posted to Twitter by Matt Walsh of The Daily Wire, one of the kids featured in the film — a 12-year-old named Avery — expresses regret concerning the promotion of his book about his life at an LGBT youth event in the nation’s capital.
Scene from HBO's pro-trans documentary. A young boy ("girl") tells his mom that the LGBT activism she's forcing him to do is "ruining his life." She parades him around to show him off while he is visibly in despair. Here he tries to explain how he feels but she disregards it. pic.twitter.com/lMTJQy1Ycl — Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) November 23, 2020
“I just don’t want to even have a book. I’ve done too much in this. It’s ruined my life, and now everyone in this world is going to know. If I sell my book, it’s going to be on the news along with me for like the 50th time at this point, and it’s just going to make my life worse,” Avery says.
“A couple of years ago, you wanted people to know,” Avery’s mom says, completely dismissing his dissatisfaction with his circumstances. To which he responds, “Yeah, I did, but that was a really stupid silly mistake, and now I don’t.”
Of course, most parents of teenagers have heard the “you’ve ruined my life” line. Avery, though, likely likely has better cause than most, even if his parents have since allowed him to step out of the spotlight.
An interview that Popsugar conducted last month with Avery’s mom, Debi, revealed that “Avery became concerned with how open her family was at times.”
“She would hear me talking to my husband and ask, ‘Why are you having to go and tell so many people about trans kids, Mom?’ I responded, ‘Well, because I’m working with another school because that school isn’t supporting a student, and I want that kid to have a chance,’” the mother said. “I think a lot of that is what made her decide that she didn’t want to be so public at the time. She just wanted a chance to be a kid, so that was another part of the evolution that I appreciate.”
“Even now, I ask her, ‘Do you ever think you’ll be public again?’ and she said, ‘I don’t know, but if I do, I want [my advocacy work] to be on my terms, and I don’t necessarily want it to be about trans people. There are other people hurting. My friends who have a white mom and a black dad are being discriminated against. There are kids in cages at the border. Why aren’t we talking about that anymore? Why is that suddenly not on the news, Mom? I know it’s still happening,’” Debi said.
It’s a good thing that Avery has opted “to take a step back from the spotlight,”as Popsugar put it, though it’s still horribly sad that this confused young boy is still pretending to be a girl — with his parents’ approval and encouragement. In any case, this appears to be a horrible case of child exploitation in the name of a political agenda that should make anyone who cares about personal liberty sick.
“Transhood” is not about protecting or advancing the rights of the transgender community but is yet another push by people who lack any sort of moral values to make child exploitation acceptable as long as it’s veiled under social justice.
A second segment posted to Twitter by Walsh shines a light on just how far these so-called parents are willing to go to push a new sexual identity onto their children.
This is what trans indoctrination of children looks like, from HBO's new documentary promoting and celebrating child abuse. The boy here is 4 years old. His parents decided that he is "gender expansive." Later they decide he's a girl. #BoycottHBO pic.twitter.com/TlyFkmqT6X — Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) November 23, 2020
In this clip, you see a mother reading a transgender children’s book titled “Jacob’s New Dress” to her 4-year-old son, Phoenix. The book talks about a boy who made himself a dress and asserts the nonsensical notion that there are all sorts of ways to be a boy.
Phoenix tells his mother, “I’m a boy.”
“You’re a rainbow,” she replies. The child also insists that he is wearing girl clothes only to be corrected by his mother that they are “your clothes, so they are boy clothes.”
This documentary glorifies child exploitation and indoctrination in the name of acceptance and tolerance.
It puts off a vibe strikingly similar to the case of James Younger, the 7-year-old old boy in Texas who was being forced to live like a girl by his mother against the wishes of his father, who maintains the boy is being used.
Child exploitation has nothing to do with LGBT rights. Anyone who would try to equate the two issues is either lying or delusional.
The United States was founded on the ideals that every individual deserves to be free — and that includes children who are being abused and indoctrinated by their parents about sexual identity long before they should even be thinking of the words.


newspunch--2020-12-10--17 States Support Texas Lawsuit Filed With The Supreme Court

Seventeen states have now officially backed the Texas complaint to the US Supreme Court alleging that four states that certified the presidential election for Democrat Joe Biden mismanaged them in violation of the US Constitution .
Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt led his colleagues in filing the amicus brief directly to the US Supreme Court on Wednesday .
It targets Georgia , Michigan , Pennsylvania , and Wisconsin over claims of unconstitutional practices in their respective elections .
Results on Election Day showed Trump ahead of Biden in all four states , until overnight count of mail-in ballots flipped the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the lawsuit on Monday , arguing that the battleground states “ violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions , but not through the state legislatures , ” as Breitbart News reported : The lawsuit states that “ certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting ” and claims that the states “ flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how they are lawfully received , evaluated , and counted.
” Calling the acts unconstitutional , the suit claims that the actions “ had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States.
” “ Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities , without any consent by the state legislatures .
The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution , ” the lawsuit , filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton ( R ) , says : This case @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors ?
These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States ’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law , which , in turn , violated the Electors Clause of Article II , Section 1 , Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution .
By these unlawful acts , the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens ’ vote , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution .
The Supreme Court has ordered the defendant states to respond to the lawsuit by Thursday .
“ Response to the motion for leave to file a bill of complaint and to the motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order or , alternatively , for stay and administrative stay requested , due Thursday , December 10 , by 3 pm , ” the court wrote .
The State of Georgia has since fired back at the legal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Office of the Attorney General in Georgia telling Breitbart News that Paxton ’ s argument is “ constitutionally , legally and factually wrong about Georgia.
” On Wednesday , President Trump referred to the Texas case as “ the big one ” : “ No candidate has ever won both Florida and Ohio and lost .
I won them both , by a lot !
” Trump added , using the hashtag , # SupremeCourt :

Seventeen states have now officially backed the Texas complaint to the US Supreme Court alleging that four states that certified the presidential election for Democrat Joe Biden mismanaged them in violation of the US Constitution.
Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt led his colleagues in filing the amicus brief directly to the US Supreme Court on Wednesday. It targets Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin over claims of unconstitutional practices in their respective elections.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Results on Election Day showed Trump ahead of Biden in all four states, until overnight count of mail-in ballots flipped the result to the Democrat.
Breitbart reports: The states include Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and West Virginia:
States that have joined Texas’ Lawsuit filed with the Supreme Court:
-Alabama
-Arkansas
-Florida
-Indiana
-Kansas
-Louisiana
-Mississippi
-Montana
-Nebraska
-North Dakota
-Oklahoma
-South Carolina
-South Dakota
-Tennessee
-Utah
-West Virginia https://t.co/9wC2f9OhkT pic.twitter.com/ylHILdmjId — Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) December 9, 2020
Seventeen states filed a brief in the Supreme Court just now in support of Texas' request that the justices throw out the results of the presidential election in four other states that didn't support President Trump. pic.twitter.com/1sldfhrkbl — Brad Heath (@bradheath) December 9, 2020
Texas filed the lawsuit on Monday, arguing that the battleground states “violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions, but not through the state legislatures,” as Breitbart News reported:
Additionally, Texas argues that there were differences in voting rules and procedures in different counties within the states, violating the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. Finally, Texas argues that there were “voting irregularities” in these states as a result of the above.
The lawsuit states that “certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting” and claims that the states “flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted.”
Calling the acts unconstitutional, the suit claims that the actions “had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States.”
“Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution,” the lawsuit, filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R), says:
This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.
The Supreme Court has ordered the defendant states to respond to the lawsuit by Thursday.
“Response to the motion for leave to file a bill of complaint and to the motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order or, alternatively, for stay and administrative stay requested, due Thursday, December 10, by 3 pm,” the court wrote.
The State of Georgia has since fired back at the legal challenge, with a spokesperson for the Office of the Attorney General in Georgia telling Breitbart News that Paxton’s argument is “constitutionally, legally and factually wrong about Georgia.”
On Wednesday, President Trump referred to the Texas case as “the big one”:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1336668083822473221
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1336691515398250498
“No candidate has ever won both Florida and Ohio and lost. I won them both, by a lot!” Trump added, using the hashtag, #SupremeCourt:


newspunch--2020-12-10--Pompeo: Thanks to POTUS, the Chinese Communist Party Is Now Fully Exposed

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo praised President Trump for fully exposing the Chinese Communist Party as the most significant threat to the United States in recent history .
Speaking to Breitbart News , Pompeo said China ’ s coverup of the origins of the coronavirus pandemic and its covert influence operations across the US and the world , are now public knowledge .
The former CIA director warned the CCP has been allowed to operate in the shadows with impunity , but will no longer be allowed to hide its agenda from the world thanks to Trump .
“ The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pompeo said .
“ It frankly didn ’ t for a long time .
We can now see it.
” “ Each time we push back , you can see it more clearly .
Each time we talk about how this virus emanated from Wuhan , China , the Chinese try to tell a story that it came from Italy or it came from American soldiers , ” he added .
“ I think the story this week was it came from packaged food .
This is false and disinformation .
We are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this seriously because Xi Jinping is taking making China the Middle Kingdom—a global hegemony—seriously .
So we have a responsibility to get this right.
” Breitbart.com reports : Pompeo is traveling to Georgia Tech on Wednesday to deliver a speech about Chinese influence operations on American college campuses and the threat they represent to the United States .
Some on the left and in the establishment media have raised concerns that Pompeo appearing in Georgia—where there are two ongoing U.S. Senate runoffs that could determine majority control in the U.S. Senate—is a political @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on Jan. 5 , both GOP Sens .
Kelly Loeffler ( R-GA ) and David Perdue ( R-GA ) will face Democrats Rev .
Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff respectively .
Republicans will definitely have at least 50 U.S. Senate seats next year , and Democrats will definitely have at least 48 .
If the Democrats were to take these two seats , that would mean the Senate would deadlock in a 50-50 tie .
In such a scenario , whoever the Vice President of the United States is would cut the ties @ @ @ @ @ @ @ presidential candidate former Vice President Joe Biden leads in enough states that have certified their election results to win the White House next year , but President Trump is continuing with a challenge of the results .
If that challenge is unsuccessful , Biden would become the president and his running mate , Sen. Kamala Harris ( D-CA ) , would become the vice presiden , making her the tie-breaking vote in the Senate in such a scenario .
Asked about the Senate majority , and the White House next year , as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pointed to what he described as a growing bipartisan consensus on the threat of the Chinese Communist Party to the United States .
He credited Trump for building that consensus and waking up both parties to the threat from Beijing .
“ There is actually a significant bipartisan consensus on China , ” Pompeo said .
“ I ’ ve seen that when we ’ ve dealt with human rights issues and the like .
But it took President Trump .
It took President Trump to pull the bandaid off and recognize the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
So I hope whoever is president and whenever they are president , I hope that leader will conclude the same way our administration has that this is necessary for American national security.
” As for his trip to Georgia Tech , Pompeo made clear this is not despite his critics ’ claims a political trip but one focused on exposing the threat of CCP malign influence on American campuses .
He pointed to a recent speech from Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe , who similarly has raised the alarm about such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for my trip to Georgia , this is a speech about Chinese influence operations , ” Pompeo said .
“ The DNI spoke about this issue a week ago or so—Chinese influence operations and the work they ’ re doing , the lobbying they ’ re doing on American college campuses and how this impacts American national security .
Georgia Tech is one of America ’ s premiere research institution , and so I ’ m going to go down there and talk about how the Chinese have infiltrated these institutions and are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ create wealth for their people and create risk for ours .
It ’ s a set of remarks I had intended to give back in the spring at another school , but the school ultimately said they didn ’ t want me to come down and do it—I think those are connected ideas .
They didn ’ t want me to be there for the very reasons of the topic I intended to speak about , and then we got caught up with school being out because of COVID and the like , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ week at Georgia Tech .
I ’ m looking forward to it because it ’ s an important round out to this narrative I ’ ve been talking about with regard to national security and China for the last two and a half years.
” The U.S. House just passed legislation that had passed the Senate earlier this year that could lead to Chinese companies being delisted from U.S. stock exchanges if they are government-backed companies like many Chinese firms are .
Asked about this legislation , and whether he spoke to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was not sure about the particular bill but did say the president ’ s entire approach to China has been first and foremost an economic issue .
“ It ’ s very clear the president began in understanding this as an economic issue .
He began with tariffs , ” Pompeo said .
“ Then the work we ’ ve done in making sure they ’ re not using telecommunications infrastructure like Huawei to steal data and information .
We ’ ve pushed back on IP theft as well .
So your point @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also strengthened the CFIUS laws—the rule that governs how Chinese companies can invest in the United States .
We ’ ve simply said this ought to be fair and reciprocal .
If an American company can ’ t invest in China on a certain set of terms , why should a Chinese company be allowed to invest here ?
This set of legislation you ’ re describing I think relates to that .
That is if they ’ re going to raise capital and use our markets , they ought to have the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reporting that any company from anyplace else in the world ought to have .
I think that makes enormous sense , and it ’ s consistent with the president ’ s idea of fairness and reciprocity between every country .
We shouldn ’ t have a separate set of rules for China.
” What ’ s more , no matter who is president next year—Trump or Biden , depending on how the president ’ s challenges go—and no matter what happens in future elections , Pompeo believes that the Trump administration ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going to be “ lasting ” because of the work they have done to expose the threat to the American public and to the world .
He also argued that this represents a broader fight between “ freedom and tyranny , ” and that he is confident freedom will win the day in the long run .
“ It will be lasting .
The work that we ’ ve done around the world as well to inform the world about these risks has now convinced people all across the world about the challenge @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mean this is lasting , ” Pompeo said .
“ That will mean the Chinese Communist Party will not be able to count on countries across the world bending the knee for them and appeasing them but rather they will see the world is united .
They will see this isn ’ t just a battle between the U.S. and China , but rather this is about what the world is going to look like .
Is it going to be a world governed by authoritarians who don ’ t want the rule @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it going to be the model that has made the world so successful for the last 100 years—the rule of law , nation states acting in their own best interest ?
Tha ’ s the competition between freedom and tyranny and I am very confident that the work that President Trump and our administration has done will put the world in a place where freedom will prevail .
”

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo praised President Trump for fully exposing the Chinese Communist Party as the most significant threat to the United States in recent history.
Speaking to Breitbart News, Pompeo said China’s coverup of the origins of the coronavirus pandemic and its covert influence operations across the US and the world, are now public knowledge.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
The former CIA director warned the CCP has been allowed to operate in the shadows with impunity, but will no longer be allowed to hide its agenda from the world thanks to Trump.
“The CCP has now shown itself,” Pompeo said.
“It frankly didn’t for a long time. We can now see it.”
“Each time we push back, you can see it more clearly. Each time we talk about how this virus emanated from Wuhan, China, the Chinese try to tell a story that it came from Italy or it came from American soldiers,” he added.
“I think the story this week was it came from packaged food. This is false and disinformation. We are unraveling their narrative. We have taken this seriously because Xi Jinping is taking making China the Middle Kingdom—a global hegemony—seriously. So we have a responsibility to get this right.”
Breitbart.com reports: Pompeo is traveling to Georgia Tech on Wednesday to deliver a speech about Chinese influence operations on American college campuses and the threat they represent to the United States. Some on the left and in the establishment media have raised concerns that Pompeo appearing in Georgia—where there are two ongoing U.S. Senate runoffs that could determine majority control in the U.S. Senate—is a political trip disguised as official business. Upcoming on Jan. 5, both GOP Sens. Kelly Loeffler (R-GA) and David Perdue (R-GA) will face Democrats Rev. Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff respectively. Republicans will definitely have at least 50 U.S. Senate seats next year, and Democrats will definitely have at least 48. If the Democrats were to take these two seats, that would mean the Senate would deadlock in a 50-50 tie. In such a scenario, whoever the Vice President of the United States is would cut the ties. As it stands now, Democrat presidential candidate former Vice President Joe Biden leads in enough states that have certified their election results to win the White House next year, but President Trump is continuing with a challenge of the results. If that challenge is unsuccessful, Biden would become the president and his running mate, Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), would become the vice presiden, making her the tie-breaking vote in the Senate in such a scenario.
Asked about the Senate majority, and the White House next year, as it relates to China policy, Pompeo pointed to what he described as a growing bipartisan consensus on the threat of the Chinese Communist Party to the United States. He credited Trump for building that consensus and waking up both parties to the threat from Beijing.
“There is actually a significant bipartisan consensus on China,” Pompeo said. “I’ve seen that when we’ve dealt with human rights issues and the like. But it took President Trump. It took President Trump to pull the bandaid off and recognize the challenge that the Chinese Communist Party presented. So I hope whoever is president and whenever they are president, I hope that leader will conclude the same way our administration has that this is necessary for American national security.”
As for his trip to Georgia Tech, Pompeo made clear this is not despite his critics’ claims a political trip but one focused on exposing the threat of CCP malign influence on American campuses. He pointed to a recent speech from Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe, who similarly has raised the alarm about such threats from the Chinese.
“As for my trip to Georgia, this is a speech about Chinese influence operations,” Pompeo said. “The DNI spoke about this issue a week ago or so—Chinese influence operations and the work they’re doing, the lobbying they’re doing on American college campuses and how this impacts American national security. Georgia Tech is one of America’s premiere research institution, and so I’m going to go down there and talk about how the Chinese have infiltrated these institutions and are using our own knowledge against us to create wealth for their people and create risk for ours. It’s a set of remarks I had intended to give back in the spring at another school, but the school ultimately said they didn’t want me to come down and do it—I think those are connected ideas. They didn’t want me to be there for the very reasons of the topic I intended to speak about, and then we got caught up with school being out because of COVID and the like, so we’ve settled on this week at Georgia Tech. I’m looking forward to it because it’s an important round out to this narrative I’ve been talking about with regard to national security and China for the last two and a half years.”
The U.S. House just passed legislation that had passed the Senate earlier this year that could lead to Chinese companies being delisted from U.S. stock exchanges if they are government-backed companies like many Chinese firms are.
Asked about this legislation, and whether he spoke to the president about it, Pompeo said he was not sure about the particular bill but did say the president’s entire approach to China has been first and foremost an economic issue.
“It’s very clear the president began in understanding this as an economic issue. He began with tariffs,” Pompeo said. “Then the work we’ve done in making sure they’re not using telecommunications infrastructure like Huawei to steal data and information. We’ve pushed back on IP theft as well. So your point about investment issues, we’ve also strengthened the CFIUS laws—the rule that governs how Chinese companies can invest in the United States. We’ve simply said this ought to be fair and reciprocal. If an American company can’t invest in China on a certain set of terms, why should a Chinese company be allowed to invest here? This set of legislation you’re describing I think relates to that. That is if they’re going to raise capital and use our markets, they ought to have the same set of rules for accounting and reporting that any company from anyplace else in the world ought to have. I think that makes enormous sense, and it’s consistent with the president’s idea of fairness and reciprocity between every country. We shouldn’t have a separate set of rules for China.”
What’s more, no matter who is president next year—Trump or Biden, depending on how the president’s challenges go—and no matter what happens in future elections, Pompeo believes that the Trump administration’s approach to the Chinese Communist Party is going to be “lasting” because of the work they have done to expose the threat to the American public and to the world. He also argued that this represents a broader fight between “freedom and tyranny,” and that he is confident freedom will win the day in the long run.
“It will be lasting. The work that we’ve done around the world as well to inform the world about these risks has now convinced people all across the world about the challenge that the CCP presents. That will mean this is lasting,” Pompeo said. “That will mean the Chinese Communist Party will not be able to count on countries across the world bending the knee for them and appeasing them but rather they will see the world is united. They will see this isn’t just a battle between the U.S. and China, but rather this is about what the world is going to look like. Is it going to be a world governed by authoritarians who don’t want the rule of law and sovereignty, or is it going to be the model that has made the world so successful for the last 100 years—the rule of law, nation states acting in their own best interest? Tha’s the competition between freedom and tyranny and I am very confident that the work that President Trump and our administration has done will put the world in a place where freedom will prevail.”


newspunch--2020-12-10--BOMBSHELL: After 4 Years of Stonewalling, FBI Finally Admits They Have Seth Rich’s Laptop

The FBI has just admitted that it has Seth Rich ’ s laptop – the DNC staffer murdered in 2016 .
According to a bombshell email posted at Lawfrog.com and sent to attorney Ty Clevenger , the FBI now admits the following : FBI has completed the initial search identifying approximately 50 cross-reference serials , with attachments totaling over 20,000 pages , in which Seth Rich is mentioned .
FBI has also located leads that indicate additional potential records that require further searching .
.
.
.
FBI is also currently working on getting the files from Seth Rich ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be reviewed .
As you can imagine , there are thousands of files of many types .
The goal right now is to describe , generally , the types of files/personal information contained in this computer .
After more than four years of repeated denials from the FBI that they had any records about Seth Rich , the truth finally begins to emerge .
It was David Hardy , a FBI Senior official , who put that denial in writing in September 2017 .
Hardy was the Section Chief of the Record/Information Dissemination @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Information Management Division ( “ IMD ” ) ,1 Federal Bureau of Investigation ( “ FBI ” ) , in Winchester , Virginia .
He stated under oath that the FBI had no records on Seth Rich : ( 19 ) CRS Search and Results .
In response to Plaintiff ’ s request dated September 1 , 2017 , RIDS conducted an index search of the CRS for responsive main and reference file records employing the UNI application of ACS .
The FBI searched the subject ’ s name , “ Seth Conrad @ @ @ @ @ @ @ files responsive to Plaintiff ’ s request and subject to the FOIA .
The FBI ’ s searches included a three-way phonetic breakdown5 of the subject ’ s name .
These searches located no main or reference records responsive to Plaintiff ’ s FOIA request .
( 9 ) By letter executed on November 9 , 2017 , OIP advised Plaintiff it affirmed the FBI ’ s determination .
OIP further advised Plaintiff that to the extent his request sought access to records that would either confirm or deny an individual ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the FBI properly refused to confirm or deny the existence of any such records because their existence is protected from disclosure pursuant to 5 U.S.C .
§ 552 ( b ) ( 7 ) ( E ) .
.
.
Thegatewaypundit.com reports : In his 2018 declaration , Mr. Hardy also testified under oath that the Metropolitan Police Department in D.C. was solely responsible for investigating Mr. Rich ’ s murder .
This does not compute .
If Seth Rich truly was a victim of a senseless street crime in the middle of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would the FBI have his laptop .
The FBI is not a computer repair shop .
The FBI is not a computer storage facility .
The FBI collects and retains evidence of federal crimes .
It also has responsibility for counterintelligence matters .
I can understand the FBI collecting Seth Rich ’ s computer as possible evidence after he was murdered .
It would have been entirely appropriate to investigate whether or not Rich was in contact with Wikileaks .
The FBI only retains evidence on an active , open case .
But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ four years that it was never involved actively in the investigation of Seth Rich ’ s murder and that it never opened a case .
That lie is now exposed .
What is even more troubling is the fact that the FBI still holds Seth Rich ’ s computer .
If their investigation turned up nothing then the the computer would have been returned to the Rich family .
The laptop is still with the FBI .
It is now clear that the FBI did open a case regarding the murder of Seth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the DNC dump to Wikileaks .
And that case remains open .
Today ’ s disclosure from the FBI supports the claim of renowned investigative journalist , who testified in a recent deposition : After four years of stonewalling , the FBI is now starting to come clean and admit to its previous lies .
Why now ?
If the FBI was confident that Joe Biden and friends would take over in January , they could have continued to lie .
Today ’ s revelation means the FBI is now trying to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The importance of this development extends beyond the case of Seth Rich and his alleged role in the leaking of DNC emails .

1.1k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
The FBI has just admitted that it has Seth Rich’s laptop – the DNC staffer murdered in 2016.
According to a bombshell email posted at Lawfrog.com and sent to attorney Ty Clevenger, the FBI now admits the following: BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ FBI has completed the initial search identifying approximately 50 cross-reference serials, with attachments totaling over 20,000 pages, in which Seth Rich is mentioned. FBI has also located leads that indicate additional potential records that require further searching. . . . FBI is also currently working on getting the files from Seth Rich’s personal laptop into a format to be reviewed. As you can imagine, there are thousands of files of many types. The goal right now is to describe, generally, the types of files/personal information contained in this computer. JOIN THE FIGHT: BECOME A CITIZEN JOURNALIST TODAY!
After more than four years of repeated denials from the FBI that they had any records about Seth Rich, the truth finally begins to emerge. It was David Hardy, a FBI Senior official, who put that denial in writing in September 2017. Hardy was the Section Chief of the Record/Information Dissemination Section (“RIDS”), Information Management Division (“IMD”),1 Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), in Winchester, Virginia. He stated under oath that the FBI had no records on Seth Rich: (19) CRS Search and Results. In response to Plaintiff’s request dated September 1, 2017, RIDS conducted an index search of the CRS for responsive main and reference file records employing the UNI application of ACS. The FBI searched the subject’s name, “Seth Conrad Rich,” in order to identify files responsive to Plaintiff’s request and subject to the FOIA. The FBI’s searches included a three-way phonetic breakdown5 of the subject’s name. These searches located no main or reference records responsive to Plaintiff’s FOIA request.(9) By letter executed on November 9, 2017, OIP advised Plaintiff it affirmed the FBI’s determination. OIP further advised Plaintiff that to the extent his request sought access to records that would either confirm or deny an individual’s placement on any government watch list, the FBI properly refused to confirm or deny the existence of any such records because their existence is protected from disclosure pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(E). . . Thegatewaypundit.com reports: In his 2018 declaration, Mr. Hardy also testified under oath that the Metropolitan Police Department in D.C. was solely responsible for investigating Mr. Rich’s murder.
Now we learn that not only does the FBI have more than 20,000 pages relevant to the search term, “Seth Rich,” the FBI still has Seth Rich’s laptop computer.
This does not compute. If Seth Rich truly was a victim of a senseless street crime in the middle of the night in Northeast DC, why would the FBI have his laptop. The FBI is not a computer repair shop. The FBI is not a computer storage facility.
The FBI collects and retains evidence of federal crimes. It also has responsibility for counterintelligence matters. I can understand the FBI collecting Seth Rich’s computer as possible evidence after he was murdered. It would have been entirely appropriate to investigate whether or not Rich was in contact with Wikileaks. The FBI only retains evidence on an active, open case.
But the FBI has insisted for more than four years that it was never involved actively in the investigation of Seth Rich’s murder and that it never opened a case. That lie is now exposed.
What is even more troubling is the fact that the FBI still holds Seth Rich’s computer. If their investigation turned up nothing then the the computer would have been returned to the Rich family. The laptop is still with the FBI. It is now clear that the FBI did open a case regarding the murder of Seth Rich and whether he was a source for the DNC dump to Wikileaks. And that case remains open.
Today’s disclosure from the FBI supports the claim of renowned investigative journalist, who testified in a recent deposition:
that one of his sources had received information from an FBI report stating that Seth Rich had leaked emails to Wikileaks, requested payment and made copies of the emails as a precautionary measure.
After four years of stonewalling, the FBI is now starting to come clean and admit to its previous lies. Why now? If the FBI was confident that Joe Biden and friends would take over in January, they could have continued to lie. Today’s revelation means the FBI is now trying to get ahead of revelations to come. The importance of this development extends beyond the case of Seth Rich and his alleged role in the leaking of DNC emails.


newspunch--2020-12-10--CAUGHT RED HANDED:  Canada Planned Training With Chinese Troops; Forced to Cancel After U.S. Request

U.S. officials thwarted an attempt by Canada to train China ’ s military in cold weather tactics at a military base in Ontario , according to documents leaked on Wednesday .
The documents were obtain by Rebel News Network ‘ s Ezra Levant , who filed an official information request after seeing a news report on Sputnik that claimed a Canadian official had attended an anniversary celebration for China ’ s navy in April 2019 .
Breitbart.com reports : The Canadian government gave Levant the documents , which have been posted at thechinafiles.com .
Some appear to have been targeted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , instead of being blacked out , leaving most of the words fully visible .
The documents obtained by Levant suggest that a Canadian military official did indeed attend the “ PLA Navy 70th Anniversary Fleet Review in Qingdao , China , in April 2019 .
But they also suggest that “ 6-8 personnel ” from China ’ s People ’ s Liberation Army ( PLA ) were to participate in “ winter survival training ” at Canadian Forces Base Petawawa ( CFB Petawawa ) in Petawawa , Ontario .
The documents also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( DOD ) had asked Canada ’ s Department of National Defence/Canadian Armed Forces ( DND/CAF ) to cancel the winter training .
One email in the documents posted by Levant , dated Jan. 28 , 2019 , indicates that “ back in December [ 2018 ] DND/CAF were keen to cancel the PLA ’ s participation in the winter survival training following the request from DOD to do so.
” Another dated the same day suggests that the request came because the U.S. approach to China “ has shifted under the Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ asks “ whether several five eye countries have expressed concerns about knowledge transfer versus the U.S. only.
” A reply on Jan. 30 indicates : “ The winter survival training will not take place this winter ( 2019 ) .
… The security concerns originated primarily from the U.S. … We do not have a record of other Five Eyes countries expressing these concerns to Canada.
” The “ Five Eyes ” consist of the United Kingdom , the United States , Canada , Australia , and New Zealand , a group of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spy on one another , by mutual agreement .
Another memorandum , labeled “ SECRET , ” among Levant ’ s documents explains that the U.S. specifically asked Canada to cancel the training : “ While this decision was taken following Ms. Meng ’ s provisional arrest , we understand that it was driven principally by concerns voiced by the U.S. that the training could result in unintended and undesired knowledge transfer from Canada to the PLA.
” It also warns that China could interpret the cancellation “ in an unintended ( and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , possibly as “ a retaliatory move related to the Meng Wanzhou case.
” A draft letter by Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Ian Shugart to Deputy Minister of National Defense Jody Thomas , both serving in the Liberal government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau , asks that “ any decision by Canada to reduce/cut ties should be carefully considered to avoid sending any unhelpful or unintended messages.
” It asks that the foreign affairs department ( “ Global Affairs Canada ” ) be consulted before canceling or postponing any future joint military @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comment to Breitbart News : “ I don ’ t think any Canadians knew that Trudeau has been training the Chinese army , here on Canadian soil , at Canadian Forces Bases .
It ’ s shocking to me that Canada would train a Communist dictatorship in winter warfare techniques that could theoretically be used against us — and will surely be used against our ally India , as well as against Chinese citizens in Xinjiang , Tibet and Hong Kong.
“ The anti-American language in the secret documents is deeply worrying , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ itself away from our traditional democracy allies , and towards the world ’ s worst tyrants — much like Pierre Trudeau tried to do during the Cold War .
”

U.S. officials thwarted an attempt by Canada to train China’s military in cold weather tactics at a military base in Ontario, according to documents leaked on Wednesday.
The documents were obtain by Rebel News Network‘s Ezra Levant, who filed an official information request after seeing a news report on Sputnik that claimed a Canadian official had attended an anniversary celebration for China’s navy in April 2019.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
China has been holding two Canadian citizens, Michael Spavor and Michael Kovrig, as hostages since December 2018, following Canada’s arrest of a Huawei executive, Meng Wanzhou, who is wanted in the USA. JOIN THE FIGHT: BECOME A CITIZEN JOURNALIST TODAY! Both Canadians have been charged with espionage.
Breitbart.com reports: The Canadian government gave Levant the documents, which have been posted at thechinafiles.com. Some appear to have been targeted for redaction, but were greyed out, instead of being blacked out, leaving most of the words fully visible.
The documents obtained by Levant suggest that a Canadian military official did indeed attend the “PLA Navy 70th Anniversary Fleet Review in Qingdao, China, in April 2019. But they also suggest that “6-8 personnel” from China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) were to participate in “winter survival training” at Canadian Forces Base Petawawa (CFB Petawawa) in Petawawa, Ontario.
One reason the Chinese might have been interested in winter tactics: PLA soldiers would later become involved in conflicts with Indian troops in the Himalayas.
The documents also indicate that the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) had asked Canada’s Department of National Defence/Canadian Armed Forces (DND/CAF) to cancel the winter training.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has been accused of “pay to play” fundraising with an adviser to the Chinese government, and Foreign Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne reportedly has mortgages with the Bank of China.
One email in the documents posted by Levant, dated Jan. 28, 2019, indicates that “back in December [2018] DND/CAF were keen to cancel the PLA’s participation in the winter survival training following the request from DOD to do so.” Another dated the same day suggests that the request came because the U.S. approach to China “has shifted under the Trump administration.”
An email the following day asks “whether several five eye countries have expressed concerns about knowledge transfer versus the U.S. only.” A reply on Jan. 30 indicates: “The winter survival training will not take place this winter (2019). … The security concerns originated primarily from the U.S. … We do not have a record of other Five Eyes countries expressing these concerns to Canada.”
The “Five Eyes” consist of the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, a group of allies who share intelligence and do not spy on one another, by mutual agreement.
Another memorandum, labeled “SECRET,” among Levant’s documents explains that the U.S. specifically asked Canada to cancel the training: “While this decision was taken following Ms. Meng’s provisional arrest, we understand that it was driven principally by concerns voiced by the U.S. that the training could result in unintended and undesired knowledge transfer from Canada to the PLA.”
It also warns that China could interpret the cancellation “in an unintended (and unhelpful) way” to Canada-China relations, possibly as “a retaliatory move related to the Meng Wanzhou case.”
A draft letter by Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Ian Shugart to Deputy Minister of National Defense Jody Thomas, both serving in the Liberal government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, asks that “any decision by Canada to reduce/cut ties should be carefully considered to avoid sending any unhelpful or unintended messages.” It asks that the foreign affairs department (“Global Affairs Canada”) be consulted before canceling or postponing any future joint military activities with China.
Levant provided a comment to Breitbart News:“I don’t think any Canadians knew that Trudeau has been training the Chinese army, here on Canadian soil, at Canadian Forces Bases. It’s shocking to me that Canada would train a Communist dictatorship in winter warfare techniques that could theoretically be used against us — and will surely be used against our ally India, as well as against Chinese citizens in Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong.“The anti-American language in the secret documents is deeply worrying, as it shows that Canada is reorienting itself away from our traditional democracy allies, and towards the world’s worst tyrants — much like Pierre Trudeau tried to do during the Cold War.”


newspunch--2020-12-10--Joe Biden Facing Increasing Oppostion Over His Defence Secretary Nominee

Joe Biden has nominated Lloyd Austin as defence secretary despite increasing opposition from Senate Democrats Critics have reaised questions over the retired general ’ s recent military service and his suitability for the job Breitbart reports : In order to get Austin confirmed , Congress would have to grant Austin a waiver from a law that requires a defense secretary be out of uniform for at least seven years , aimed at upholding the principle of civilian leadership of the armed forces .
The waiver has only been granted twice in history .
Once for Army Gen .
( Ret @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recently for Marine Gen .
( Ret . )
James Mattis .
However , 17 Senate Democrats opposed a waiver for Mattis , arguing it undermined the principle of civilian leadership of the Pentagon , and many Democrats and Never Trumpers criticized Trump for appointing Mattis and other retired generals to senior civilian positions in his administration .
During a live-stream event introducing Austin , Biden seemed to go back and forth between touting Austin ’ s military service and recognizing the importance of civilian leadership of the Pentagon .
Biden said there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the law that he “ fully ” understood and respected , but added he would not be asking for the waiver if he did not believe the “ moment ” in history called for it .
He then criticized President Donald Trump for putting the “ civilian military dynamic ” under “ great stress in the past four years ” and argued Austin would work “ tirelessly ” to get it back on track — but then went back to praising Austin ’ s service on the battlefield .
I have personally worked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seen him lead American fighting forces on the field of battle .
I ’ ve also watched him faithfully carry out the orders of the civilian leadership of this nation .
There ’ s no doubt in my mind not any doubt whatsoever whether this nominee will honor and respect and on a day to day basis breathe life into the preeminent principle of civilian leadership over military matters in our nation .
Biden also called Austin “ General ” no fewer than 12 times — something Democrats had criticized Trump for doing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Biden used military cliches when describing Austin , including as “ cool under fire ” and a “ soldier ’ s leader.
” He thanked Austin ’ s family for “ once again ” sharing him with the country .
Sen. Kamala Harris ( D-CA ) , who also spoke at the live-stream event , also called Austin “ General ” three times and praised him as “ a seasoned , highly decorated , and trailblazing commander.
” She said with this nomination , Austin would “ continue his service.
” Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take questions , even as some journalists shouted out questions about the waiver .
Biden ’ s decision to choose a retired general was despite the 2020 Democratic Party platform vowing to end the Trump ’ s “ distortion of civilian and military roles in decision-making.
” “ We will reinstate national security policymaking processes that advance competent civilian control , ” the platform said .
It is the hypocrisy of Biden ’ s pick that has an increasing number of Democrats wary .
Already , four Senate Democrats have indicated they will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Axios .

Joe Biden has nominated Lloyd Austin as defence secretary despite increasing opposition from Senate Democrats
Critics have reaised questions over the retired general’s recent military service and his suitability for the job
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Breitbart reports: In order to get Austin confirmed, Congress would have to grant Austin a waiver from a law that requires a defense secretary be out of uniform for at least seven years, aimed at upholding the principle of civilian leadership of the armed forces.
The waiver has only been granted twice in history.
Once for Army Gen. (Ret.) George Marshall, and more recently for Marine Gen. (Ret.) James Mattis. However, 17 Senate Democrats opposed a waiver for Mattis, arguing it undermined the principle of civilian leadership of the Pentagon, and many Democrats and Never Trumpers criticized Trump for appointing Mattis and other retired generals to senior civilian positions in his administration.
During a live-stream event introducing Austin, Biden seemed to go back and forth between touting Austin’s military service and recognizing the importance of civilian leadership of the Pentagon.
Biden said there was a “good reason” for the law that he “fully” understood and respected, but added he would not be asking for the waiver if he did not believe the “moment” in history called for it.
He then criticized President Donald Trump for putting the “civilian military dynamic” under “great stress in the past four years” and argued Austin would work “tirelessly” to get it back on track — but then went back to praising Austin’s service on the battlefield.
I have personally worked with this man. I’ve seen him lead American fighting forces on the field of battle. I’ve also watched him faithfully carry out the orders of the civilian leadership of this nation. There’s no doubt in my mind not any doubt whatsoever whether this nominee will honor and respect and on a day to day basis breathe life into the preeminent principle of civilian leadership over military matters in our nation.
Biden also called Austin “General” no fewer than 12 times — something Democrats had criticized Trump for doing with Mattis and others.
In addition, Biden used military cliches when describing Austin, including as “cool under fire” and a “soldier’s leader.” He thanked Austin’s family for “once again” sharing him with the country.
Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), who also spoke at the live-stream event, also called Austin “General” three times and praised him as “a seasoned, highly decorated, and trailblazing commander.” She said with this nomination, Austin would “continue his service.”
Biden, Austin, and Harris did not take questions, even as some journalists shouted out questions about the waiver.
Biden’s decision to choose a retired general was despite the 2020 Democratic Party platform vowing to end the Trump’s “distortion of civilian and military roles in decision-making.”
“We will reinstate national security policymaking processes that advance competent civilian control,” the platform said.
It is the hypocrisy of Biden’s pick that has an increasing number of Democrats wary.
Already, four Senate Democrats have indicated they will vote against a waiver, according to Axios.


newspunch--2020-12-10--Hillary Clinton Claims There Was ‘No Evidence Of Election Fraud’

Hillary Clinton has claimed that the 2020 presidential election was “ not close ” and that there was “ no evidence of fraud ” The failed Trump challenger also insulted the Republicans who have been backing President Trump ’ s efforts to ensure election integrity .
In a tweet on Thursday Clinton said : “ The election was not close .
There was no evidence of fraud .
The states have certified the results .
Yet Trump continues to try to overturn the election at the expense of our democracy ” She concluded : “ the emperor has no clothes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ him have no spines ” Breitbart reports : Clinton ’ s remarks follow weeks of lawsuits , sworn affidavits , and testimonies from individuals alleging instances of fraud in their respective circles .
Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani addressed the media ’ s claims of “ no evidence ” of voter fraud in a November press conference , noting that a sizeable number of the allegations are being reported by American citizens of both political parties .
“ That takes us to Michigan , where there was an honest Democrat who said they were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ We ’ ll show you her affidavit , because I know you keep reporting , falsely , that we have no evidence.
” “ That we have no specific acts of fraud , ” he continued .
“ That ’ s because the coverage of this has been almost as dishonest as the scheme itself.
” Others have given testimonies at public forums , including a USPS subcontractor who gave his testimony at a December 1 press conference hosted by the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society .
During his remarks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which carried “ thousands ” of ballots , went missing .
This week , over two dozen lawmakers signed a letter to President Trump , urging him to direct Attorney General William Barr to appoint a special counsel to investigate election irregularities .
The letter , led by Rep. Lance Gooden ( R-TX ) , reads in part : The Department of Justice has been asked on multiple occasions to launch an investigation into this matter , but inaction from the Department along with public comments made by the Attorney General indicate a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your campaign and other elected officials across the nation have alleged .
Barr recently revealed that the Department of Justice ( DOJ ) had not uncovered fraud “ on a scale that could have affected a different outcome in the election.
” “ How can you give an election to someone who lost the election by hundreds of thousands of legal votes in each of the swing states .
How can a country be run by an illegitimate president ?
” Trump asked on Thursday .
Trump added that the Supreme Court “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the greatest Election abuse in the history of the United States ” :

Hillary Clinton has claimed that the 2020 presidential election was “not close” and that there was “no evidence of fraud”
The failed Trump challenger also insulted the Republicans who have been backing President Trump’s efforts to ensure election integrity.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
In a tweet on Thursday Clinton said: “The election was not close. There was no evidence of fraud. The states have certified the results. Yet Trump continues to try to overturn the election at the expense of our democracy”
She concluded: “the emperor has no clothes. Republican electeds who continue to humor him have no spines”
The election was not close. There was no evidence of fraud. The states have certified the results.
Yet Trump continues to try to overturn the election at the expense of our democracy.
The emperor has no clothes.
Republican electeds who continue to humor him have no spines. — Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) December 10, 2020
Breitbart reports: Clinton’s remarks follow weeks of lawsuits, sworn affidavits, and testimonies from individuals alleging instances of fraud in their respective circles. Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani addressed the media’s claims of “no evidence” of voter fraud in a November press conference, noting that a sizeable number of the allegations are being reported by American citizens of both political parties.
“That takes us to Michigan, where there was an honest Democrat who said they were cheating,” he told reporters. “We’ll show you her affidavit, because I know you keep reporting, falsely, that we have no evidence.”
“That we have no specific acts of fraud,” he continued. “That’s because the coverage of this has been almost as dishonest as the scheme itself.”
Others have given testimonies at public forums, including a USPS subcontractor who gave his testimony at a December 1 press conference hosted by the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society. During his remarks, he revealed that his trailer, which carried “thousands” of ballots, went missing.
This week, over two dozen lawmakers signed a letter to President Trump, urging him to direct Attorney General William Barr to appoint a special counsel to investigate election irregularities.
The letter, led by Rep. Lance Gooden (R-TX), reads in part:
The Department of Justice has been asked on multiple occasions to launch an investigation into this matter, but inaction from the Department along with public comments made by the Attorney General indicate a lack of willingness to investigate the irregularities your campaign and other elected officials across the nation have alleged.
Last week, I asked that @realDonaldTrump instruct the Attorney General to appoint a Special Counsel to investigate election irregularities.
Now twenty-six Republican colleagues have joined me in calling for an independent investigation to restore faith in our elections!
(1/3) pic.twitter.com/Zk5Dxzk3fj — Lance Gooden (@Lancegooden) December 9, 2020
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1337052585547755523
Everybody's got their own OPINIONS about election fraud.
I'm not interested in opinions. I want FACTS. pic.twitter.com/nFtmvzcNRM — Lance Gooden (@Lancegooden) December 10, 2020
Joined @LanceGooden and 25 of our colleagues to urge Attorney General Barr to appoint a Special Counsel to investigate impropriety and misconduct in last month's presidential election. https://t.co/JhIgWxdwSU — David Rouzer (@RepDavidRouzer) December 9, 2020
The DOJ needs to listen to #WeThePeople and address their election concerns NOW.
Glad to join @Lancegooden and more than two dozen House members to DEMAND action to ensure election integrity for @realDonaldTrump. pic.twitter.com/9tJknZFor0 — Congressman Ted Budd (@RepTedBudd) December 9, 2020
Barr recently revealed that the Department of Justice (DOJ) had not uncovered fraud “on a scale that could have affected a different outcome in the election.”
“How can you give an election to someone who lost the election by hundreds of thousands of legal votes in each of the swing states. How can a country be run by an illegitimate president?” Trump asked on Thursday.
Trump added that the Supreme Court “has a chance to save our Country from the greatest Election abuse in the history of the United States”:


newspunch--2020-12-10--Democrats Furious As One Third Of US States Challenge Biden Election Win At Supreme Court

Democrats are outraged at a Texas-led motion to the US Supreme Court challenging the elections in four states that declared Joe Biden the winner .
The Democrats ’ fury along with a rant by CNN ’ s Chris Cuomo has got # CivilWar trending on Twitter .
RT reports : While some of the 40,000-plus references were to the original 1861-65 conflict over the future of the US , or wars in other places , a great many tweets expressed the frustration of Democrats and their media allies over the Texas lawsuit against Georgia , Michigan , Pennsylvania and Wisconsin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ based on mass mail-in ballots – which was backed by 18 other states and President Donald Trump himself .
“ Seventeen states demanding that the Supreme Court disenfranchise voters in other states seems like a great way to get to a second civil war , ” tweeted Pod Save America co-host Tommy Vietor , a former spokesman in the Obama administration .
He was referring to the amicus brief by 17 states filed on Wednesday , in support of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton ’ s complaint to the US Supreme Court .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Texas , with Arizona joining the brief later in the day .
“ Step 1 in the next civil war , ” tweeted Obamacare architect Andy Slavitt , commenting on the same news .
“ All signed by people who claim to stand for law and order.
” Writer Jeff Sharlet also claimed the suit is seeking to “ overthrow a national election by throwing out the votes of four other states in order to disenfranchise 25 states + popular vote.
” There was even an obligatory racism angle , as comedian John @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Confederate wannabes are threatening to start a second Civil War to keep a draft-dodging Yankee in power because that ’ s how racism works.
” Another reason for the trend may have been a rant by CNN opinion anchor Chris Cuomo – taken out of context – from his show on Tuesday , which somehow became a story covered by mainstream media outlets on Wednesday evening .
Cuomo was denouncing Senator Lindsey Graham ( R-South Carolina ) over something he told Sean Hannity of Fox News , about the divisions between Republicans ahead @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Graham had complained about a “ civil war brewing ” among the GOP in Georgia and called for the state legislature to “ order an audit of the signatures in the presidential race to see if the system worked.
” Cuomo argued the vote in Georgia had been certified “ three times over ” and that Graham wasn ’ t looking to “ save the country ” but his own posterior .
“ Civil war ?
Seriously , Senator ?
Do your words still come from your brain or just some reservoir @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The irony of those words was lost on Cuomo and the Democrats – who spent the past four years accusing Trump of being Hitler and claiming Russia had somehow stolen the 2016 election , and were now fulminating against a case that the Supreme Court yet to agree to hear .

1.6k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Democrats are outraged at a Texas-led motion to the US Supreme Court challenging the elections in four states that declared Joe Biden the winner.
The Democrats’ fury along with a rant by CNN’s Chris Cuomo has got #CivilWar trending on Twitter.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
RT reports: While some of the 40,000-plus references were to the original 1861-65 conflict over the future of the US, or wars in other places, a great many tweets expressed the frustration of Democrats and their media allies over the Texas lawsuit against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin – where Biden was declared the winner based on mass mail-in ballots – which was backed by 18 other states and President Donald Trump himself.
“Seventeen states demanding that the Supreme Court disenfranchise voters in other states seems like a great way to get to a second civil war,” tweeted Pod Save America co-host Tommy Vietor, a former spokesman in the Obama administration.
https://twitter.com/TVietor08/status/1336768760770793472
He was referring to the amicus brief by 17 states filed on Wednesday, in support of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s complaint to the US Supreme Court. There are actually 18 states that backed Texas, with Arizona joining the brief later in the day.
“Step 1 in the next civil war,”tweeted Obamacare architect Andy Slavitt, commenting on the same news. “All signed by people who claim to stand for law and order.”
Writer Jeff Sharlet also claimed the suit is seeking to “overthrow a national election by throwing out the votes of four other states in order to disenfranchise 25 states + popular vote.”
So, uh, 17 state governments are asking a court to overthrow a national election by throwing out the votes of four other states in order to disenfranchise 25 states + popular vote. In civil war terms, that's called a "prelude." https://t.co/e1m3u1GtVY — Jeff Sharlet (@JeffSharlet) December 9, 2020
In civil war terms, that’s called a ‘prelude’,” Sharlet tweeted.
There was even an obligatory racism angle, as comedian John Hartzell said a “bunch of gun-toting Confederate wannabes are threatening to start a second Civil War to keep a draft-dodging Yankee in power because that’s how racism works.”
A bunch of gun-toting Confederate wannabes are threatening to start a second Civil War to keep a draft-dodging Yankee in power because that's how racism works. — Middle Age Riot (@middleageriot) December 9, 2020
Another reason for the trend may have been a rant by CNN opinion anchor Chris Cuomo – taken out of context – from his show on Tuesday, which somehow became a story covered by mainstream media outlets on Wednesday evening.
Cuomo was denouncing Senator Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) over something he told Sean Hannity of Fox News, about the divisions between Republicans ahead of the January 5 run-off Senate elections.
Graham had complained about a “civil war brewing” among the GOP in Georgia and called for the state legislature to “order an audit of the signatures in the presidential race to see if the system worked.”
https://twitter.com/joehick58/status/1336531025007087619
Cuomo argued the vote in Georgia had been certified “three times over” and that Graham wasn’t looking to “save the country” but his own posterior.
“Civil war? Seriously, Senator? Do your words still come from your brain or just some reservoir of bile?” Cuomo said.
The irony of those words was lost on Cuomo and the Democrats – who spent the past four years accusing Trump of being Hitler and claiming Russia had somehow stolen the 2016 election, and were now fulminating against a case that the Supreme Court yet to agree to hear.


newspunch--2020-12-11--President Trump’s Hanukkah Message: ‘With Courage, We’re Gonna WIN This Folks’

President Trump issued a Hanukkah message Wednesday night , telling Americans that he is still set to win the 2020 election .
“ Let me just wish everybody a happy Hanukkah , and to about three of you here a merry Christmas , ” the president joked to a crowd of around 100 Jewish leaders at the White House .
POTUS then went on to address the ongoing election disruption .
His remarks were met with chants of , “ Four more years !
” Trump said it was a “ 2-0 ” in the election and he had “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The holiday of Hanukkah begins on Thursday evening .
Trump also issued a statement wishing his “ warmest greetings to the millions of Jewish people in the United States and around the world as they begin the celebration of Hanukkah and the miracle that kept the flames of the menorah burning in the Second Temple for eight nights.
” “ The candle-lighting tradition that began over 2,000 years ago is rooted in perseverance and faith—two virtues that are indicative of the Jewish culture and the Jewish faith .
This year ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at a time when the unbreakable bond between the United States and Israel has never been stronger , ” Trump said , according to the White House statement .
He went on to outline his administration ’ s “ unwavering solidarity ” with the Jewish people , noting the U.S. brokered normalization deals between Israel and major Arab countries , including the United Arab Emirates , Bahrain , and Sudan .
“ As we enter this season of celebration and reflection , we must continue to build on this progress and work toward @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Middle East and around the world .
Over the next eight days , families and friends will gather to carry on the time-honored tradition of lighting the menorah .
The First Lady and I wish you all a joyous celebration .
Happy Hanukkah !
” the president concluded .

President Trump issued a Hanukkah message Wednesday night, telling Americans that he is still set to win the 2020 election.
“Let me just wish everybody a happy Hanukkah, and to about three of you here a merry Christmas,” the president joked to a crowd of around 100 Jewish leaders at the White House.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
POTUS then went on to address the ongoing election disruption.
With the help of “certain very important people, if they have wisdom and if they have courage, we are going to win this election,” Trump declared.
VIDEO: Trump tells the crowd at the Hanukkah party that with the help of “certain very important people, if they have wisdom and if they have courage, we are going to win this election.” — remarks followed with loud chants of “four more years.” pic.twitter.com/FjCyFGOqPC — Jacob Kornbluh (@jacobkornbluh) December 10, 2020
Breitbart.com reports: Trump said contesting the election is “an historic fight — it’s really for the soul of our country — because if somebody wins an election by a lot and they take the election away and they give it to people that shouldn’t be there, I think that’s a problem for our country.”
His remarks were met with chants of, “Four more years!”
https://twitter.com/AdamMilstein/status/1336844660900122625?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1336844660900122625%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.breitbart.com%2Fpolitics%2F2020%2F12%2F10%2Ftrump-at-white-house-hanukkah-party-with-courage-were-going-to-win-this-election%2F
Trump said it was a “2-0” in the election and he had “tremendous cases” to overturn the results.
The holiday of Hanukkah begins on Thursday evening.
Trump also issued a statement wishing his “warmest greetings to the millions of Jewish people in the United States and around the world as they begin the celebration of Hanukkah and the miracle that kept the flames of the menorah burning in the Second Temple for eight nights.”
“The candle-lighting tradition that began over 2,000 years ago is rooted in perseverance and faith—two virtues that are indicative of the Jewish culture and the Jewish faith. This year’s observance of the Festival of Lights comes at a time when the unbreakable bond between the United States and Israel has never been stronger,” Trump said, according to the White House statement.
He went on to outline his administration’s “unwavering solidarity” with the Jewish people, noting the U.S. brokered normalization deals between Israel and major Arab countries, including the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Sudan.
“As we enter this season of celebration and reflection, we must continue to build on this progress and work toward a brighter and more secure future in the Middle East and around the world. Over the next eight days, families and friends will gather to carry on the time-honored tradition of lighting the menorah. The First Lady and I wish you all a joyous celebration. Happy Hanukkah!” the president concluded.


newspunch--2020-12-11--Nasty Nancy: ‘I Proudly Stand by Swalwell’

“ I don ’ t have any concern about Mr. Swalwell , ” Pelosi defiantly announced during her weekly news conference on Thursday .
Pelosi appointed Swalwell to the House Intelligence Committee in January 2015 .
“ When that was made known to the members of Congress , it was over.
” Foxnews.com reports : Fox News ’ Chad Pergram asked Pelosi whether background checks are necessary for all staff and interns given that the suspected spy placed at least one intern in Swalwell ’ s office , as Axios first reported .
“ I don ’ t know that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for every intern who comes into the Capitol , ” Pelosi said .
McCarthy wants Swalwell , D-Calif. , to resign from the Intelligence Committee , calling him a “ national security threat.
” “ Why did ( Pelosi ) allow him to stay on that committee ?
Let ’ s hope she does not in the next Congress , ” McCarthy said Thursday .
A spokesperson for Pelosi said Wednesday that the speaker has confidence in Swalwell ’ s ability to stay on the Intelligence Committee , which has access to classified @ @ @ @ @ @ @ confidence in Congressman Swalwell ’ s service in the Congress and on the Intelligence Committee , ” Pelosi ’ s spokesman Drew Hammill said .
Swalwell ’ s judgment has been in the spotlight after Axios reported that a Chinese national named Fang Fang or Christine Fang targeted up-and-coming local politicians , including those who had the potential to become national figures .
Fang reportedly took part in fundraising for Swalwell ’ s 2014 reelection campaign — although she did not make donations nor was there evidence of illegal contributions .
Fang ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ through the Chinese Student Association , Axios reported , and by 2014 , she had developed “ close ties ” to Swalwell ’ s office .
Investigators became so alarmed by Fang ’ s behavior and activities that they alerted Swalwell in 2015 to their concerns , and gave him a “ defensive briefing.
” Swalwell then cut off all ties with Fang and has not been accused of any wrongdoing , according to an official who spoke to the outlet .
Officials do not believe she received or passed on classified information @ @ @ @ @ @ @ least two Midwestern mayors turned sexual , according to Axios , with at least two incidents being caught by FBI surveillance .
When asked about the nature of Swalwell ’ s relationship with Fang , the Democratic congressman ’ s office declined to comment .
The congressman ’ s office told Axios that Swalwell “ long ago , provided information about this person — whom he met more than eight years ago , and whom he hasn ’ t seen in nearly six years — to the FBI.
” Beyond that , however @ @ @ @ @ @ @ story , citing concerns related to classified information .

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has declared she is proudly standing by Rep. Eric Swalwell, despite reports indicating he had been potentially compromised by a Chinese spy.
Pelosi insists she is not concerned about Swalwell’s ability to handle classified data, despite his alleged connections with the Chinese Communist Party. BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
“I don’t have any concern about Mr. Swalwell,” Pelosi defiantly announced during her weekly news conference on Thursday.
She also pushed back against Republican House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy who questioned whether Pelosi knew of China’s attempt to infiltrate Congress via Swalwell.
Pelosi appointed Swalwell to the House Intelligence Committee in January 2015.
Pelosi pointed out that Democratic and Republican leadership were briefed “at the same moment” in the spring of 2015 about a suspected Chinese spy targeting members of Congress.
“In terms of Mr. Swalwell — in the spring of 2015, the leadership of the House and the [Intelligence] Committee were informed that overtures from a Chinese person were being made to members of Congress,” Pelosi said.
“When that was made known to the members of Congress, it was over.”
“l do think that it’s unfortunate that Mr. McCarthy is trying to make an issue of this when we all found out at the same time,” Pelosi told reporters.
Foxnews.com reports: Fox News’ Chad Pergram asked Pelosi whether background checks are necessary for all staff and interns given that the suspected spy placed at least one intern in Swalwell’s office, as Axios first reported.
“I don’t know that it means that we have background checks for every intern who comes into the Capitol,” Pelosi said.
McCarthy wants Swalwell, D-Calif., to resign from the Intelligence Committee, calling him a “national security threat.”
“Why did (Pelosi) allow him to stay on that committee? Let’s hope she does not in the next Congress,” McCarthy said Thursday.
A spokesperson for Pelosi said Wednesday that the speaker has confidence in Swalwell’s ability to stay on the Intelligence Committee, which has access to classified materials.
“The Speaker has full confidence in Congressman Swalwell’s service in the Congress and on the Intelligence Committee,” Pelosi’s spokesman Drew Hammill said.
Swalwell’s judgment has been in the spotlight after Axios reported that a Chinese national named Fang Fang or Christine Fang targeted up-and-coming local politicians, including those who had the potential to become national figures.
Fang reportedly took part in fundraising for Swalwell’s 2014 reelection campaign — although she did not make donations nor was there evidence of illegal contributions. Fang’s earliest known engagement with Swalwell occurred through the Chinese Student Association, Axios reported, and by 2014, she had developed “close ties” to Swalwell’s office.
Investigators became so alarmed by Fang’s behavior and activities that they alerted Swalwell in 2015 to their concerns, and gave him a “defensive briefing.” Swalwell then cut off all ties with Fang and has not been accused of any wrongdoing, according to an official who spoke to the outlet.
Officials do not believe she received or passed on classified information.
Fang’s relationships with at least two Midwestern mayors turned sexual, according to Axios, with at least two incidents being caught by FBI surveillance. When asked about the nature of Swalwell’s relationship with Fang, the Democratic congressman’s office declined to comment.
The congressman’s office told Axios that Swalwell “long ago, provided information about this person — whom he met more than eight years ago, and whom he hasn’t seen in nearly six years — to the FBI.” Beyond that, however, his office would not discuss the story, citing concerns related to classified information.


newspunch--2020-12-11--Hunter Biden Under CRIMINAL Investigation Over Shady Chinese Deal

I learned yesterday for the first time that the U.S. Attorney ’ s Office in Delaware advised my legal counsel , also yesterday , that they are investigating my tax affairs .
I take this matter very seriously but I am confident that a professional and objective review of these matters will demonstrate that I handled my affairs legally and appropriately , including with the benefit of professional tax advisors .
CNN ’ s report said that authorities were investigating “ multiple financial issues ” including whether Hunter Biden “ violated tax and money laundering laws in business dealings in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ criminal investigation into Hunter Biden began before William Barr became Attorney General of the United States .
Sinclair Broadcast Group reported in October that Hunter Biden was under investigation , a story that was largely ignored by the left-wing mainstream media .
Fox News reported in October that the FBI had taken possession of a laptop belonging to Hunter Biden in connection to a money laundering investigation .
Again , that story was largely ignored by the left-wing mainstream media .
The federal criminal investigation into Hunter Biden is looking at gifts that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ may not have reported .
Hunter Biden later briefly acted as a lawyer to represent Patrick Ho , who ran an organization backed by CEFC , and who was convicted in 2018 of paying millions of dollars in bribes to officials in Chad and Uganda to benefit CEFC energy projects in those countries .
Ho was sentenced to a three-year federal prison term .
He has since been released and is back in Hong Kong , his attorney said .
Hunter Biden had been involved in an earlier Chinese business venture that drew @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Joe Biden ’ s staff , according to the New Yorker .
In 2013 , Hunter Biden became involved with US and Chinese partners who were creating an investment fund called BHR Partners for deals outside China .
Hunter Biden was an unpaid member of the BHR board and took an equity stake after his father left office , the New Yorker reported .
During the campaign , Biden repeatedly refused to call China an opponent .
In August , National Security Adviser Robert O ’ Brien warned that China was “ trying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ China had “ the most sophisticated global influence programs and strategies and abilities and capabilities in the world.
” National Counterintelligence and Security Center ( NCSC ) Director William Evanina said in an August statement that one of the nation ’ s that posed the biggest threat to last month ’ s elections was China , which he said preferred that last “ President Trump – whom Beijing sees as unpredictable – does not win reelection.
” A statement from the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency ( CISA ) claimed that numerous top @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that last month ’ s elections were “ the most secure in American history .
”

815 SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, is officially under a federal criminal investigation over his shady Chinese business dealings, according to reports.
On Wednesday night, Joe Biden was forced to respond to the news that federal prosecutors have publicly launched a probe into Hunter’s taxes, insisting that he is “proud” of his embattled son. BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Federal officials halted their investigation in the run-up to the election to avoid affecting the outcome. JOIN THE FIGHT: BECOME A CITIZEN JOURNALIST TODAY!
Now the election is over, prosecutors in Delaware, the IRS Criminal Investigation agency, and the FBI, have stepped up their probe by issuing subpoenas and seeking interviews, according to CNN.
Reacting to the news, the Biden transition team released a statement declaring that joe remains “deeply proud of his son.”
Dailywire.com reports: In a statement, Hunter Biden claimed:
I learned yesterday for the first time that the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Delaware advised my legal counsel, also yesterday, that they are investigating my tax affairs. I take this matter very seriously but I am confident that a professional and objective review of these matters will demonstrate that I handled my affairs legally and appropriately, including with the benefit of professional tax advisors.
CNN’s report said that authorities were investigating “multiple financial issues” including whether Hunter Biden “violated tax and money laundering laws in business dealings in foreign countries, principally China.” The criminal investigation into Hunter Biden began before William Barr became Attorney General of the United States.
Sinclair Broadcast Group reported in October that Hunter Biden was under investigation, a story that was largely ignored by the left-wing mainstream media.
Fox News reported in October that the FBI had taken possession of a laptop belonging to Hunter Biden in connection to a money laundering investigation. Again, that story was largely ignored by the left-wing mainstream media.
The federal criminal investigation into Hunter Biden is looking at gifts that Hunter Biden received from China that he may not have reported.
CNN added:
Hunter Biden later briefly acted as a lawyer to represent Patrick Ho, who ran an organization backed by CEFC, and who was convicted in 2018 of paying millions of dollars in bribes to officials in Chad and Uganda to benefit CEFC energy projects in those countries. Ho was sentenced to a three-year federal prison term. He has since been released and is back in Hong Kong, his attorney said. Hunter Biden had been involved in an earlier Chinese business venture that drew concerns in the Obama White House and Joe Biden’s staff, according to the New Yorker. In 2013, Hunter Biden became involved with US and Chinese partners who were creating an investment fund called BHR Partners for deals outside China. Hunter Biden was an unpaid member of the BHR board and took an equity stake after his father left office, the New Yorker reported.
During the campaign, Biden repeatedly refused to call China an opponent. In August, National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien warned that China was “trying to elect Joe Biden” and that China had “the most sophisticated global influence programs and strategies and abilities and capabilities in the world.”
National Counterintelligence and Security Center (NCSC) Director William Evanina said in an August statement that one of the nation’s that posed the biggest threat to last month’s elections was China, which he said preferred that last “President Trump – whom Beijing sees as unpredictable – does not win reelection.”
A statement from the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) claimed that numerous top government agencies and private sector entities believed that last month’s elections were “the most secure in American history.”