newspunch--2020-12-22--British Government Quietly Contracts Firms to Produce COVID ‘Freedom Passports’

The British government has quietly contracted two companies to develop COVID “ freedom passports , ” that would theoretically be used to segregate society between those who have been tested or vaccinated against COVID and those who haven ’ t .
While the UK government still insists that it will not introduce such a system , the firms have been given orders to develop an app based system to integrate a QR code linking to a digital passport .
This QR code would be used to allow or deny entry into pubs , restaurants , cinemas , clubs , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ After scanning in the code , the venue could refuse entry to those without a recent negative result , ” the Daily Mail reports .
Summit.news reports : The ‘ negative Covid-19 test certification ’ plans were discovered on the UK Government ’ s contracts finder .
The site shows that in November a £42,000 contract was awarded to a company called Netcompany UK to develop a ‘ Covid-19 Certification/Passport MVP ’ ( minimum viable product ’ ) .
Another contract for £34,000 was awarded to Hub Company to develop an app @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for COVID tests .
“ It is about looking at ways we could use this in future , ’ a Deprtment of Health source claimed , adding “ It is looking at whether it would be possible.
” “ There are no plans to introduce immunity passports , ” the source also claimed , echoing previous government assurances .
We previously reported , back in November , on the government ’ s active plans to develop a QR code system to use as an ‘ immunity passport ’ .
The report , stemming @ @ @ @ @ @ @ noted that “ Those who refuse to get the Covid-19 jab would likely be refused entry to venues , as part of the same proposals.
” Other reports have suggested that an app already used prominently in the UK by people to book doctor and hospital appointments could implement a vaccination status section that will show whether a person has taken the coronavirus jab or not , and that businesses may use it to refuse entry to those who have not .
Government officials have previously signalled that the system could be integrated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and trace ’ app .
Health Secretary Matt Hancock , who has repeatedly refused to rule out making vaccination mandatory for all UK citizens , previously announced that ‘ immunity passports ’ could be rolled out for those who have antibodies against the virus , allowing them to participate in society .
The system would be similar in nature to that being considered by Ticketmaster , who it was revealed are considering making customers prove they ’ ve had the vaccine or a negative coronavirus test before allowing them to purchase tickets .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ on such measures would be up to event organizers but that they were still mulling over the implementation of the system .
The spectre of so called ‘ immunity passports ’ stretches beyond Britain .
Recently , the government in Ontario , Canada admitted that it is exploring ‘ immunity passports ’ in conjunction with restrictions on travel and access to social venues for the unvaccinated .
Last week , Israel announced that citizens who get the COVID-19 vaccine will be given ‘ green passports ’ that will enable them to attend venues @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of other government and travel industry figures in both the US , Britain and beyond have suggested that ‘ COVID passports ’ are coming in order for ‘ life to get back to normal ’ .
Sam Grant , campaign manager at the civili liberties advocacy group Liberty has warned that “ any form of immunity passport risks creating a two-tier system in which some of us have access to freedoms and support while others are shut out.
” “ These systems could result in people who don ’ t have immunity potentially @ @ @ @ @ @ @ work or housing – with the most marginalised among us hardest hit , ” Grant further warned .
“ This has wider implications too because any form of immunity passport could pave the way for a full ID system – an idea which has repeatedly been rejected as incompatible with building a rights-respecting society , ” Grant further urged .
While some see the idea of ‘ immunity passports ’ as antithetical to a free society , others support travel bans for the unvaccinated , and are begging for the health passes to @ @ @

The British government has quietly contracted two companies to develop COVID “freedom passports,” that would theoretically be used to segregate society between those who have been tested or vaccinated against COVID and those who haven’t.
While the UK government still insists that it will not introduce such a system, the firms have been given orders to develop an app based system to integrate a QR code linking to a digital passport.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
This QR code would be used to allow or deny entry into pubs, restaurants, cinemas, clubs, and any other type of public venue.
“After scanning in the code, the venue could refuse entry to those without a recent negative result,” the Daily Mail reports.
Summit.news reports: The ‘negative Covid-19 test certification’ plans were discovered on the UK Government’s contracts finder.
The site shows that in November a £42,000 contract was awarded to a company called Netcompany UK to develop a ‘Covid-19 Certification/Passport MVP’ (minimum viable product’).
Another contract for £34,000 was awarded to Hub Company to develop an app that would include a personal QR code for COVID tests.
“It is about looking at ways we could use this in future,’ a Deprtment of Health source claimed, adding “It is looking at whether it would be possible.”
“There are no plans to introduce immunity passports,” the source also claimed, echoing previous government assurances.
We previously reported, back in November, on the government’s active plans to develop a QR code system to use as an ‘immunity passport’.
The report, stemming from sources close to the government, noted that “Those who refuse to get the Covid-19 jab would likely be refused entry to venues, as part of the same proposals.”
Other reports have suggested that an app already used prominently in the UK by people to book doctor and hospital appointments could implement a vaccination status section that will show whether a person has taken the coronavirus jab or not, and that businesses may use it to refuse entry to those who have not.
Government officials have previously signalled that the system could be integrated with the much maligned NHS ‘track and trace’ app.
Health Secretary Matt Hancock, who has repeatedly refused to rule out making vaccination mandatory for all UK citizens, previously announced that ‘immunity passports’ could be rolled out for those who have antibodies against the virus, allowing them to participate in society.
The system would be similar in nature to that being considered by Ticketmaster, who it was revealed are considering making customers prove they’ve had the vaccine or a negative coronavirus test before allowing them to purchase tickets.
Ticketmaster later clarified that a final decision on such measures would be up to event organizers but that they were still mulling over the implementation of the system.
The spectre of so called ‘immunity passports’ stretches beyond Britain. Recently, the government in Ontario, Canada admitted that it is exploring ‘immunity passports’ in conjunction with restrictions on travel and access to social venues for the unvaccinated.
Last week, Israel announced that citizens who get the COVID-19 vaccine will be given ‘green passports’ that will enable them to attend venues and eat at restaurants.
A litany of other government and travel industry figures in both the US, Britain and beyond have suggested that ‘COVID passports’ are coming in order for ‘life to get back to normal’.
Sam Grant, campaign manager at the civili liberties advocacy group Liberty has warned that “any form of immunity passport risks creating a two-tier system in which some of us have access to freedoms and support while others are shut out.”
“These systems could result in people who don’t have immunity potentially being blocked from essential public services, work or housing – with the most marginalised among us hardest hit,” Grant further warned.
“This has wider implications too because any form of immunity passport could pave the way for a full ID system – an idea which has repeatedly been rejected as incompatible with building a rights-respecting society,” Grant further urged.
While some see the idea of ‘immunity passports’ as antithetical to a free society, others support travel bans for the unvaccinated, and are begging for the health passes to be implemented:
To get things back to normal? Once you introduce a vaccine passport, nothing is normal ever again. End of story. — Esty (@EstyHammond) December 1, 2020
https://twitter.com/dsbahia1/status/1333700671246307329?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1333700671246307329%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fsummit.news%2F2020%2F12%2F22%2Fbritish-government-contracts-firms-to-make-covid-freedom-passports%2F
https://twitter.com/2limN3ddy/status/1336618348025683973?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1336618348025683973%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fsummit.news%2F2020%2F12%2F22%2Fbritish-government-contracts-firms-to-make-covid-freedom-passports%2F
https://twitter.com/rickypaige121/status/1336016794805530624?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1336016794805530624%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fsummit.news%2F2020%2F12%2F22%2Fbritish-government-contracts-firms-to-make-covid-freedom-passports%2F


newspunch--2020-12-22--Poland: Big Tech Will Face $2.2 Million Fines Whenever They Censor Free Speech

A new law set to be passed in Poland would fine social media giants a whopping $ 2.2 million each time they unconstitutionally censor lawful free speech .
While liberal governments in western nations seek to fine Facebook and Twitter for failing to remove so-called “ hate speech ” , Poland is taking a refreshingly different approach .
“ Under its provisions , social media services will not be allowed to remove content or block accounts if the content on them does not break Polish law , ” Poland In reports .
“ In the event of removal or blockage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the platform , which will have 24 hours to consider it .
Within 48 hours of the decision , the user will be able to file a petition to the court for the return of access .
The court will consider complaints within seven days of receipt and the entire process is to be electronic.
” Summit.news reports : Polish Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro made clear that the legal initiative was designed to tackle censorship and that it wouldn ’ t impact the right of people who have been slandered or defamed to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ victims of tendencies for ideological censorship are also representatives of various groups operating in Poland , whose content is removed or blocked , just because they express views and refer to values that are unacceptable from the point of view of communities… with an ever-stronger influence on the functioning of social media , ” said Ziobro .
“ We realise that it is not an easy topic , we realise that on the internet there should also be a sphere of guarantees for everybody who feels slandered , a sphere of limitation of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a negative impact on the sphere of other people ’ s freedom.
” “ But we would like to propose such tools that will enable both one side and the other to call for the decision of a body that will be able to adjudicate whether content appearing on such and such a social media account really violates personal rights , whether it can be eliminated , or whether there is censorship.
” This should be the model for all developed countries that value free speech .
In reality , the opposite is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ set to introduce an “ Online Safety Bill ” that threatens social media platforms with fines up to $ 24 million for failing “ to protect users or remove harmful content .
”

4.9k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
A new law set to be passed in Poland would fine social media giants a whopping $2.2 million each time they unconstitutionally censor lawful free speech.
While liberal governments in western nations seek to fine Facebook and Twitter for failing to remove so-called “hate speech”, Poland is taking a refreshingly different approach.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
“Under its provisions, social media services will not be allowed to remove content or block accounts if the content on them does not break Polish law,” Poland In reports.
“In the event of removal or blockage, a complaint can be sent to the platform, which will have 24 hours to consider it. Within 48 hours of the decision, the user will be able to file a petition to the court for the return of access. The court will consider complaints within seven days of receipt and the entire process is to be electronic.”
Summit.news reports: Polish Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro made clear that the legal initiative was designed to tackle censorship and that it wouldn’t impact the right of people who have been slandered or defamed to pursue justice.
“Often, the victims of tendencies for ideological censorship are also representatives of various groups operating in Poland, whose content is removed or blocked, just because they express views and refer to values that are unacceptable from the point of view of communities… with an ever-stronger influence on the functioning of social media,” said Ziobro.
“We realise that it is not an easy topic, we realise that on the internet there should also be a sphere of guarantees for everybody who feels slandered, a sphere of limitation of various content which may carry with it a negative impact on the sphere of other people’s freedom.”
“But we would like to propose such tools that will enable both one side and the other to call for the decision of a body that will be able to adjudicate whether content appearing on such and such a social media account really violates personal rights, whether it can be eliminated, or whether there is censorship.”
This should be the model for all developed countries that value free speech.
In reality, the opposite is true, with the UK for example set to introduce an “Online Safety Bill” that threatens social media platforms with fines up to $24 million for failing “to protect users or remove harmful content.”


newspunch--2020-12-22--Kat Von D Flees California Due to ‘Tyrannical Government Control’

YouTuber and tattoo artist Kat Von D announced she will be fleeing Los Angeles , California due to the tyrannical government control over people ’ s lives in the state .
In a Facebook post last week , Von D announced that she will be relocating to a small town in Indiana due to liberal California ’ s extreme corruption .
“ Definitely not ever selling our beautiful home in LA , but with all that ’ s been taking place in California , with terrible policies , tyrannical government overreach , ridiculous taxing , amongst so much more corruption @ @ @ @ @ @ @ plant roots in a small town where my son can be free to play , and where we can eventually retire one day , ” she said .
Dailywire.com reports : Kat Von D also clarified that she will not be closing her shop in Los Angeles .
“ We will eventually be spending more time in beautiful Indiana once I finish doing some remodeling on our new historic house.
” Reaction from fans of the famed tattoo artists ranged from enthusiastic to condescending .
“ I left the sheltered , depressing area @ @ @ @ @ @ @ did most everyone I knew .
I also lived in Cali .
More expensive , but more opportunities in every aspect .
A lot of people there never left the state .
Tyrannical overreach ?
That ’ s hilarious because you guys never would be successful without ‘ worldly ’ /Cali attitudes , ” said one fan .
“ Welcome to Indiana Kat .
I love it here .
Married a Hoosier and we moved back to his hometown 23 yrs ago when he got out of the Military , ” said another @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to take the time to address the concerns and questions of your fans , and what an amazing mom you are Kat !
I admire your soul , and yours is truly a beautiful heart !
All the best wishes for you and your family , ” said another .
Kat Von D ’ s exodus from California follows a string of celebrities and high-profile business names that have left the once Golden State due to horrific policies .
Billionaire Elon Musk , for instance , recently announced his move to Texas after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Tesla and SpaceX obviously have mass operations in California .
In fact , it ’ s worth noting that Tesla is the last car company still manufacturing cars in California , ” Musk said during a virtual conference hosted by the Wall Street Journal .
“ Space X is the last aerospace company still doing significant manufacturing in California .
There used to be over a dozen car plants in California , and California used to be the center of aerospace manufacturing .
My companies are the last two left.
” “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ moved to Texas .
We ’ ve got the Starship development here in South Texas where I am right now .
We ’ re hopefully going to do a launch later today .
And then we ’ ve got big factory developments just outside of Austin for Giga Texas , ” he added .

YouTuber and tattoo artist Kat Von D announced she will be fleeing Los Angeles, California due to the tyrannical government control over people’s lives in the state.
In a Facebook post last week, Von D announced that she will be relocating to a small town in Indiana due to liberal California’s extreme corruption.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
“Definitely not ever selling our beautiful home in LA, but with all that’s been taking place in California, with terrible policies, tyrannical government overreach, ridiculous taxing, amongst so much more corruption, we just felt the need to plant roots in a small town where my son can be free to play, and where we can eventually retire one day,” she said.
Dailywire.com reports: Kat Von D also clarified that she will not be closing her shop in Los Angeles. “We will eventually be spending more time in beautiful Indiana once I finish doing some remodeling on our new historic house.”
Reaction from fans of the famed tattoo artists ranged from enthusiastic to condescending.
“I left the sheltered, depressing area you’re moving to, so did most everyone I knew. I also lived in Cali. More expensive, but more opportunities in every aspect. A lot of people there never left the state. Tyrannical overreach? That’s hilarious because you guys never would be successful without ‘worldly’ /Cali attitudes,” said one fan.
“Welcome to Indiana Kat. I love it here. Married a Hoosier and we moved back to his hometown 23 yrs ago when he got out of the Military,” said another fan.
“How wonderful for you to take the time to address the concerns and questions of your fans, and what an amazing mom you are Kat! I admire your soul, and yours is truly a beautiful heart! All the best wishes for you and your family,” said another.
Kat Von D’s exodus from California follows a string of celebrities and high-profile business names that have left the once Golden State due to horrific policies. Billionaire Elon Musk, for instance, recently announced his move to Texas after repeatedly criticizing the COVID-19 lockdown policies.
“Tesla and SpaceX obviously have mass operations in California. In fact, it’s worth noting that Tesla is the last car company still manufacturing cars in California,” Musk said during a virtual conference hosted by the Wall Street Journal. “Space X is the last aerospace company still doing significant manufacturing in California. There used to be over a dozen car plants in California, and California used to be the center of aerospace manufacturing. My companies are the last two left.”
“For myself, yes, I have moved to Texas. We’ve got the Starship development here in South Texas where I am right now. We’re hopefully going to do a launch later today. And then we’ve got big factory developments just outside of Austin for Giga Texas,” he added.


newspunch--2020-12-22--Backstabbing Barr: ‘Absolutely NO Need for Special Counsel to Investigate Hunter Biden or 2020 Elect

Backstabbing Barr: ‘Absolutely NO Need for Special Counsel to Investigate Hunter Biden or 2020 Election’

“ To the extent that there ’ s an investigation , I think that it ’ s being handled responsibly and professionally currently within the department .
And to this point , I have not seen a reason to appoint a special counsel , and I have no plan to do so before I leave , ” Barr saidof the Hunter Biden investigation .
Barr also said he would not appoint a special counsel to investigate Trump ’ s baseless claims of widespread fraud in the election .
“ If I thought a special counsel at this stage was the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would name one .
But I haven ’ t , and I ’ m not going to , ” Barr said .
Over the weekend , The New York Times reported that Trump had floated appointing Sidney Powell — a conservative attorney who has consistently pushed conspiracy theories and false claims of fraud in court cases seeking to overturn the results of the election — as a special counsel to investigate election fraud .
The Times also reported that the idea of Trump issuing an executive order to seize voting machines had been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conspiracy theory that machines were hacked or compromised to “ switch ” votes from Trump to Biden .
The vast majority of voters in the United States and all in key swing states voted with hand-marked paper ballots , ballot-marking devices , machines that produce a paper ballot , or machines with a voter-verifiable and auditable paper trail .
Barr said on Monday that he saw no basis for the federal government to seize any such machines .
Some legal experts said over the weekend that , outside of a criminal investigation , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no authority to seize or impound property owned by states and localities , like voting equipment .
“ There ’ s been one assertion that would be systemic fraud and that would be the claim that machines were programmed essentially to skew the election results , ” Barr said .
“ And the DHS and DOJ have looked into that , and so far , we haven ’ t seen anything to substantiate that .
”

Disgraced Attorney General Bill Barr dug the knife in President Trump’s back a little deeper on Monday when he gleefully told reporters that he would not appoint special counsels to investigate either Hunter Biden or the rampant voter fraud in the 2020 election.
Hunter is the subject of a federal criminal investigation over his shady business dealings with China. Barr admitted recently that he kept the Biden investigation under wraps during the 2020 presidential election. BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Businessinsider.com reports: Only the attorney general has the authority to appoint a special counsel. On Monday, Barr, who’s set to leave the DOJ on Wednesday, threw cold water on the idea of doing so for either matter.
“To the extent that there’s an investigation, I think that it’s being handled responsibly and professionally currently within the department. And to this point, I have not seen a reason to appoint a special counsel, and I have no plan to do so before I leave,” Barr saidof the Hunter Biden investigation.
Barr also said he would not appoint a special counsel to investigate Trump’s baseless claims of widespread fraud in the election.
“If I thought a special counsel at this stage was the right tool and was appropriate, I would name one. But I haven’t, and I’m not going to,” Barr said.
Over the weekend, The New York Times reported that Trump had floated appointing Sidney Powell — a conservative attorney who has consistently pushed conspiracy theories and false claims of fraud in court cases seeking to overturn the results of the election — as a special counsel to investigate election fraud.
The Times also reported that the idea of Trump issuing an executive order to seize voting machines had been raised, in furtherance of the baseless conspiracy theory that machines were hacked or compromised to “switch” votes from Trump to Biden.
The vast majority of voters in the United States and all in key swing states voted with hand-marked paper ballots, ballot-marking devices, machines that produce a paper ballot, or machines with a voter-verifiable and auditable paper trail.
Barr said on Monday that he saw no basis for the federal government to seize any such machines. Some legal experts said over the weekend that, outside of a criminal investigation, the federal government likely has little to no authority to seize or impound property owned by states and localities, like voting equipment.
Barr also substantially broke with Trump in an interview with The Associated Press in early December in which he said the DOJ had “not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election” and found no evidence that voting machines were compromised.
“There’s been one assertion that would be systemic fraud and that would be the claim that machines were programmed essentially to skew the election results,” Barr said. “And the DHS and DOJ have looked into that, and so far, we haven’t seen anything to substantiate that.”


newspunch--2020-12-22--Nancy Pelosi Says She Plans To Pull Trump Out Of The White House ‘By His Hair’

Nancy Pelosi is so frustrated that President Trump is still in the White House that she plans to drag him out by his hair .
“ I ’ m counting down the hours ‘ til he ’ s gone .
I plan to pull him out of there by his hair , his little hands , and his feet , ” Pelosi said , according to a report by Politico Breitbart reports : Pelosi made her remarks as Democrats and Republicans negotiated a massive 5,593 $ 2.3 trillion coronavirus relief and government funding bill over the weekend .
President Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a year after she accused the president of having a “ meltdown ” during an October 2019 meeting at the White House , pointedly tore up his State of the Union Speech and tried to impeach the president .
In return , Trump frequently criticized Pelosi , calling her “ crazy Nancy ” and “ nuts ” and even “ crazy as a bedbug.
” Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin did most of the negotiating with House Democrat leaders as well as White House chief of staff Mark Meadows .
“ I am taking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , when asked by reporters in September why he stopped talking to Pelosi to negotiate a coronavirus relief bill .
“ I ’ m taking the high road by not seeing them .
That ’ s the high road .
”

659 SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Nancy Pelosi is so frustrated that President Trump is still in the White House that she plans to drag him out by his hair.
“I’m counting down the hours ‘til he’s gone. I plan to pull him out of there by his hair, his little hands, and his feet,” Pelosi said, according to a report by Politico
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Breitbart reports: Pelosi made her remarks as Democrats and Republicans negotiated a massive 5,593 $2.3 trillion coronavirus relief and government funding bill over the weekend.
President Trump and Pelosi have not spoken for over a year after she accused the president of having a “meltdown” during an October 2019 meeting at the White House, pointedly tore up his State of the Union Speech and tried to impeach the president.
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) hinted at a plan Thursday to remove President Donald Trump from office using the 25th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. https://t.co/vK2pntuSdB — Breitbart News (@BreitbartNews) October 8, 2020
In return, Trump frequently criticized Pelosi, calling her “crazy Nancy” and “nuts” and even “crazy as a bedbug.”
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin did most of the negotiating with House Democrat leaders as well as White House chief of staff Mark Meadows.
“I am taking the high road,” Trump explained, when asked by reporters in September why he stopped talking to Pelosi to negotiate a coronavirus relief bill. “I’m taking the high road by not seeing them. That’s the high road.”


newspunch--2020-12-22--Cuomo Praises Himself For ‘Working Hard’ Says Santa’s ‘Going To Be Very Good To Me’

New York Gov .
Andrew Cuomo has claimed he is not on Santa ’ s naughty list because of all the hard work he has done this year .
During a Monday press conference Cuomo said “ santa ’ s going to be very good to me .
I can tell .
I worked hard this year ” as he encouraged New Yorkers to have a “ healthy holiday.
“ His comments were , not surprisingly , met with a flood of criticism on social media .
RT reports : The governor also jokingly gave Santa Claus an exemption from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cuomo ’ s comments have invited backlash on social media , with critics reminding the governor of his numerous controversies this year .
“ He definitely worked hard on his book deal , his Emmy award and lying through his teeth all year , ” Fox News meteorologist Janice Dean tweeted in response to the press conference .
Dean lost both her in-laws to Covid-19 and has blasted Cuomo on numerous occasions for an early order during the pandemic forcing nursing homes to take in positive Covid cases , a decision critics say @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Governor Cuomo deserves coal in his stocking for the rest of his life , ” conservative pundit Brad Polumbo wrote .

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo has claimed he is not on Santa’s naughty list because of all the hard work he has done this year.
During a Monday press conference Cuomo said “santa’s going to be very good to me. I can tell. I worked hard this year” as he encouraged New Yorkers to have a “healthy holiday.“
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
His comments were, not surprisingly, met with a flood of criticism on social media.
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo says Santa will treat him favorably this year because how hard he worked. (Photo credit: Getty images / iStock)
RT reports: The governor also jokingly gave Santa Claus an exemption from New York Covid-19 pandemic traveling restrictions.
Cuomo’s comments have invited backlash on social media, with critics reminding the governor of his numerous controversies this year.
“He definitely worked hard on his book deal, his Emmy award and lying through his teeth all year,” Fox News meteorologist Janice Dean tweeted in response to the press conference.
Dean lost both her in-laws to Covid-19 and has blasted Cuomo on numerous occasions for an early order during the pandemic forcing nursing homes to take in positive Covid cases, a decision critics say led to thousands of deaths.
He definitely worked hard on his book deal, his Emmy award and lying through his teeth all year. — Janice Dean (@JaniceDean) December 21, 2020
Worked hard to help kill seniors, jobs and New York State in general? — Janice Dean (@JaniceDean) December 21, 2020
“Governor Cuomo deserves coal in his stocking for the rest of his life,” conservative pundit Brad Polumbo wrote.


newspunch--2020-12-23--Breaking: President Trump Vetoes ‘Unconstitutional’ Defense Bill

President Trump vetoed the annual $ 740 billion defense bill and sent it back to Congress .
The bill included a number of partisan amendments , including a block on the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan .
Last week Trump said he would veto the bill because it would not allow for the removal of US military from other countries .
RT reports : Trump announced he had vetoed the National Defense Authorization Act ( NDAA ) on Wednesday , making good on an earlier promise to send the annual defense spending bill back to Congress to be reworked .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ national security measures , includes provisions that fail to respect our veterans and our military ’ s history , and contradicts efforts by my Administration to put America first in our national security and foreign policy actions , ” Trump said in a statement .
It is a “ gift ” to China and Russia .
The NDAA , which allocates defense funding for fiscal year 2021 , passed both houses of Congress with bipartisan support , as it has for 59 straight years in a row .
It passed the Senate with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now return to Capitol Hill after Christmas either to amend the legislation , or to vote to override Trump ’ s veto .
Responding to Trump ’ s note , House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ( D-California ) said she will re-convene the chamber on Monday to override the veto .
Trump had no issue with the bill ’ s massive allocation of funds to the US military , since he has repeatedly bragged on the campaign trail about increasing that spending .
Instead , the president focused his criticism on a number of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his political opponents .
Among them are provisions that would prevent him from withdrawing US forces from Afghanistan without congressional approval , and allow for the renaming of US military bases with Confederate names .
Trump also promised to veto the bill if it did not include a provision to repeal Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act , which shields social media companies from legal action over content posted on their platforms .
Though the NDAA has passed Congress every year for nearly six decades , Trump is not the first president @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 2015 iteration of the NDAA , claiming that the version he was presented with included Republican-crafted loopholes that bypassed his proposed budget cuts to the military .

President Trump vetoed the annual $740 billion defense bill and sent it back to Congress.
The bill included a number of partisan amendments, including a block on the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Last week Trump said he would veto the bill because it would not allow for the removal of US military from other countries.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1339594787133919239
RT reports: Trump announced he had vetoed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) on Wednesday, making good on an earlier promise to send the annual defense spending bill back to Congress to be reworked.
The NDAA “fails to include critical national security measures, includes provisions that fail to respect our veterans and our military’s history, and contradicts efforts by my Administration to put America first in our national security and foreign policy actions,” Trump said in a statement.
It is a “gift” to China and Russia.
The NDAA, which allocates defense funding for fiscal year 2021, passed both houses of Congress with bipartisan support, as it has for 59 straight years in a row. It passed the Senate with a veto-proof majority, so senators will now return to Capitol Hill after Christmas either to amend the legislation, or to vote to override Trump’s veto.
Responding to Trump’s note, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-California) said she will re-convene the chamber on Monday to override the veto.
Trump had no issue with the bill’s massive allocation of funds to the US military, since he has repeatedly bragged on the campaign trail about increasing that spending. Instead, the president focused his criticism on a number of provisions tacked on to the bill by his political opponents.
Among them are provisions that would prevent him from withdrawing US forces from Afghanistan without congressional approval, and allow for the renaming of US military bases with Confederate names.
Trump also promised to veto the bill if it did not include a provision to repeal Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which shields social media companies from legal action over content posted on their platforms.
Though the NDAA has passed Congress every year for nearly six decades, Trump is not the first president to reject it. Barack Obama vetoed the 2015 iteration of the NDAA, claiming that the version he was presented with included Republican-crafted loopholes that bypassed his proposed budget cuts to the military.


newspunch--2020-12-23--George Clooney Gushes Over ‘Very Smart, Wise Man’ Joe Biden

George Clooney has been gushing over the prospect of a Joe Biden presidency , saying that Biden is a “ very smart , wise man ” The Hollywood star also said that Biden projects compassion and kindness .
Breitbart reports : In an interview with USA Today , George Clooney radiated pure optimism about Biden .
“ I feel like we ’ re in so much better shape because I do think this : Moments meet the man or woman .
And this is Joe Biden ’ s moment , ” he said .
“ He is a compassionate , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going to need that after we ’ ve lost probably close to 400,000 people by the time we get [ the coronavirus pandemic ] in our rear-view mirror.
” The Batman & Robin star said that Biden is the right fit for the moment .
“ We ’ re going to need compassion through this and [ Biden ] is every bit of that , on top of being a very smart , wise guy , wise man , ” he said , adding that Biden will have “ a really effective presidency @ @ @ @ @ @ @ resistance from Senate Republicans .
The Hollywood star made no mention of the festering Biden family scandal involving Hunter Biden ’ s alleged use of his father ’ s political office to score lucrative business deals .
USA Today entertainment writer Brian Truitt didn ’ t ask Clooney about the scandal during the video interview .
Instead , the journalist talked to Clooney about his new Netflix movie The Midnight Sky , his pet dog , and his Christmas plans .
Hunter Biden is currently under investigation by the Justice Department .
Joe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claiming without evidence that it is “ Russian disinformation.
” George Clooney was a fundraiser for Biden ’ s presidential campaign , participating in a virtual conversation with former president Barack Obama to raise money for the then-candidate .

942 SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
George Clooney has been gushing over the prospect of a Joe Biden presidency, saying that Biden is a “very smart, wise man”
The Hollywood star also said that Biden projects compassion and kindness.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Breitbart reports: In an interview with USA Today, George Clooney radiated pure optimism about Biden. “I feel like we’re in so much better shape because I do think this: Moments meet the man or woman. And this is Joe Biden’s moment,” he said. “He is a compassionate, kind man. And we’re going to need that after we’ve lost probably close to 400,000 people by the time we get [the coronavirus pandemic] in our rear-view mirror.”
The Batman & Robin star said that Biden is the right fit for the moment.
“We’re going to need compassion through this and [Biden] is every bit of that, on top of being a very smart, wise guy, wise man,” he said, adding that Biden will have “a really effective presidency,” but will likely deal with resistance from Senate Republicans.
The Hollywood star made no mention of the festering Biden family scandal involving Hunter Biden’s alleged use of his father’s political office to score lucrative business deals.
USA Today entertainment writer Brian Truitt didn’t ask Clooney about the scandal during the video interview. Instead, the journalist talked to Clooney about his new Netflix movie The Midnight Sky, his pet dog, and his Christmas plans.
Hunter Biden is currently under investigation by the Justice Department. Joe Biden continues to downplay the scandal, claiming without evidence that it is “Russian disinformation.”
George Clooney was a fundraiser for Biden’s presidential campaign, participating in a virtual conversation with former president Barack Obama to raise money for the then-candidate.


newspunch--2020-12-23--President Trump Demands Congress Add $2,000 Direct Payments to COVID Relief Bill

The controversial 5,593-page bill was unveiled on Monday night , drawing immediate backlash for only sending $ 600 to struggling American families .
Trump slammed the bill for extending direct coronavirus relief payments to family members of illegal aliens , granting them up to $ 1,800 each .
“ This is far more than the Americans are given , ” Trump said .
“ I am asking Congress to amend this bill and increase the ridiculously low $ 600 to $ 2000 , or $ 4000 for a couple , ” he said .
The also president lamented that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to restaurants and small businesses .
Trump berated members of Congress for failing to even read the massive bill before passing it quickly in the last hours before the Christmas holiday .
“ It ’ s called the COVID relief bill , but it has almost nothing to do with COVID , ” he said .
He criticized the billions appropriated for aid to countries like Cambodia , Burma , Egypt , countries in Central America , and even $ 25 million for “ democracy and gender programs ” in Pakistan .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ $ 40 million for the Kennedy Center , $ 1 billion for the Smithsonian , and $ 154 for the National Gallery of Art .
“ Congress found plenty of money for foreign countries and lobbyists and special interests , while sending the bare minimum to the American people who need it , ” Trump said .
Trump demanded that Congress send a better coronavirus aid package , suggesting that he might not sign it .
“ I am also asking Congress to immediately get rid of the wasteful and unnecessary items from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suitable bill or else the next administration will have to deliver a COVID relief package , and maybe that administration will be me and we will get it done , ” he concluded .

President Trump demanded Tuesday that Congress amend the miserly coronavirus rescue package and grant at least £2,000 per person.
The controversial 5,593-page bill was unveiled on Monday night, drawing immediate backlash for only sending $600 to struggling American families.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Trump slammed the bill for extending direct coronavirus relief payments to family members of illegal aliens, granting them up to $1,800 each.
“This is far more than the Americans are given,” Trump said.
Breitbart.com reports: The president did not say he would veto the bill but demanded that Congress amend it before sending it to his desk.
“I am asking Congress to amend this bill and increase the ridiculously low $600 to $2000, or $4000 for a couple,” he said.
The also president lamented that the bill also failed to provide substantial aid to restaurants and small businesses.
Trump berated members of Congress for failing to even read the massive bill before passing it quickly in the last hours before the Christmas holiday.
“It’s called the COVID relief bill, but it has almost nothing to do with COVID,” he said.
He criticized the billions appropriated for aid to countries like Cambodia, Burma, Egypt, countries in Central America, and even $25 million for “democracy and gender programs” in Pakistan.
The president also ridiculed the bill for including $40 million for the Kennedy Center, $1 billion for the Smithsonian, and $154 for the National Gallery of Art.
“Congress found plenty of money for foreign countries and lobbyists and special interests, while sending the bare minimum to the American people who need it,” Trump said.
Trump demanded that Congress send a better coronavirus aid package, suggesting that he might not sign it.
“I am also asking Congress to immediately get rid of the wasteful and unnecessary items from this legislation and to send me a suitable bill or else the next administration will have to deliver a COVID relief package, and maybe that administration will be me and we will get it done,” he concluded.
Watch below:


newspunch--2020-12-23--Mad Maxine: I Want Trump ‘Marched Outta the White House by His Military’

Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters has called on the army to march President Trump out of the White House by force .
Rep .
Waters revealed Tuesday on MSNBC that she would like to see POTUS humiliated in front of the entire nation .
Anchor Ayman Mohyeldin said , “ I know there is a lot of Democrats counting down the ways .
I wanted to read something Speaker Pelosi said about Trump .
She said she ’ s counting down the hours until he ’ s gone .
‘ I plan to pull him out of there by his hair @ @ @ @ @ @ @ feet.
’ I ’ m curious to get your thoughts .
Is that what a lot of Democrats are thinking right now about President Trump that he ’ s got to get out of there one way or the other ?
” Waters responded , “ We want him out , and we keep hearing these rumors about everything that he ’ s doing to try and stay in .
We ’ ve even heard rumors he said he ’ s not leaving .
We want him out , and to tell you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ know exactly what you do with the president who has lost an election , and you have a new person who has been elected to the presidency , and the old president is not wanting to leave .
I don ’ t know what you do .
: She added , “ My understanding or what I would like to do is I would like to see him marched out of there .
I don ’ t know whether it ’ s the secret service or whether it ’ s military or what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t stay .
He can ’ t claim , you know , ownership of the White House .
He doesn ’ t want to leave , and he ’ s doing everything possible , including talking about martial law , etc.
, etc .
We want him out of there .
I know Nancy Pelosi is counting down the hours .
She told me that also .
”

Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters has called on the army to march President Trump out of the White House by force.
Rep. Waters revealed Tuesday on MSNBC that she would like to see POTUS humiliated in front of the entire nation.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Anchor Ayman Mohyeldin said, “I know there is a lot of Democrats counting down the ways. I wanted to read something Speaker Pelosi said about Trump. She said she’s counting down the hours until he’s gone. ‘I plan to pull him out of there by his hair, his little hands, and his feet.’ I’m curious to get your thoughts. Is that what a lot of Democrats are thinking right now about President Trump that he’s got to get out of there one way or the other?”
Waters responded, “We want him out, and we keep hearing these rumors about everything that he’s doing to try and stay in. We’ve even heard rumors he said he’s not leaving. We want him out, and to tell you the truth, I don’t know exactly what you do with the president who has lost an election, and you have a new person who has been elected to the presidency, and the old president is not wanting to leave. I don’t know what you do.:
She added, “My understanding or what I would like to do is I would like to see him marched out of there. I don’t know whether it’s the secret service or whether it’s military or what have you, but he can’t stay. He can’t claim, you know, ownership of the White House. He doesn’t want to leave, and he’s doing everything possible, including talking about martial law, etc., etc. We want him out of there. I know Nancy Pelosi is counting down the hours. She told me that also.”
WATCH:


newspunch--2020-12-23--Obama Judge Rules Pedophile Who Raped Daughter Can Get Taxpayer-Funded Sex Change

49-year-old Mark Allen Campbell was sentenced in 2007 to 34 years in jail after pleading guilty to repeated first-degree rape against the young girl .
Since being locked up , Mark claims to now identify as a woman and prefers the name Nicole Rose Campbell , according to The Post Millennial .
Barack Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge James Peterson ruled that Campbell must be moved to a female prison while he awaits his sex-change surgery .
“ And some members of the public are outraged at any effort to improve the health and well being of inmates , ” he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interest lies in alleviating needless suffering by those who are dependent on the government for their care.
” Peterson ’ s order followed a three-day bench trial in March in the case of Nicole Campbell .
Also known as Mark Campbell , who in 2007 began serving a 34-year-sentence for sexual assault of a child .
The Department of Corrections agrees that Campbell , 49 , suffers from gender dysphoria , and has made some accommodations : she has received hormone treatment , counseling and is allowed to wear some women ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ men ’ s prison .
But it had denied her reassignment surgery , which she first sought in 2013 .
Not everyone with gender dysphoria wants or needs surgery for treatment , or meets the strict medical requirements to be recommended for surgery .
Peterson found that Campbell has the most severe form of gender dysphoria , in which the presence of male genitalia on her body causes particularly severe anguish .
He noted that it could take a year to schedule an appointment with the one qualified surgeon in the state , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the main women ’ s prison in the meantime .
The DOC took the position that Campbell met all the criteria for gender confirmation surgery except having practiced living as a woman in “ real life , ” which it said was impossible while residing in a men ’ s prison .
Peterson said denying the surgery by summarily citing policy amounted to deliberate indifference of her serious medical needs , a violation of the Eighth Amendment .
He gave particular consideration to the testimony of Cynthia Osborne , a social worker and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 200 inmates of gender dysphoria .
She concluded the ‘ real life experience ’ requirement before surgery may not be so important or relevant for someone like Campbell , who had experienced it before prison , has done all that she can to successfully live as a woman for several years in prison , and faces many more years of incarceration .
Peterson noted that the DOC had requested that , if Peterson ordered surgery , he first require Campbell to live for a year at Taycheedah Correctional Institution , the state ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ That request came as a surprise , because previously the DOC designated any inmate with a penis to a male prison , regardless of gender identity or expression , ” Peterson wrote .
“ I decline to impose any further prerequisites on Campbell ’ s sex reassignment surgery ; she has waited long enough.
” That doesn ’ t mean surgery will happen soon though .
According to Peterson ’ s order , there ’ s only one surgeon in Wisconsin qualified to perform the operation , and it could be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Ultimately , the surgeon must also agree that the procedure is necessary .
Campbell was represented for free by lawyers from Husch Blackwell , led by Tom Henegen .

A federal judge has ruled that a pedophile, who was convicted of raping his own 10-year-old daughter, will get a “free” sex-change courtesy of the American taxpayer.
49-year-old Mark Allen Campbell was sentenced in 2007 to 34 years in jail after pleading guilty to repeated first-degree rape against the young girl.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Since being locked up, Mark claims to now identify as a woman and prefers the name Nicole Rose Campbell, according to The Post Millennial.
Barack Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge James Peterson ruled that Campbell must be moved to a female prison while he awaits his sex-change surgery.
Jsonline.com reports: “The rights of transgender persons and sex reassignment surgery remain politically controversial, even outside the prison context,” wrote U.S. District Judge James Peterson.
“And some members of the public are outraged at any effort to improve the health and well being of inmates,” he wrote. “But the true public interest lies in alleviating needless suffering by those who are dependent on the government for their care.”
Peterson’s order followed a three-day bench trial in March in the case of Nicole Campbell. Also known as Mark Campbell, who in 2007 began serving a 34-year-sentence for sexual assault of a child.
The Department of Corrections agrees that Campbell, 49, suffers from gender dysphoria, and has made some accommodations: she has received hormone treatment, counseling and is allowed to wear some women’s clothing at Racine Correctional Institute, a men’s prison.
But it had denied her reassignment surgery, which she first sought in 2013. Not everyone with gender dysphoria wants or needs surgery for treatment, or meets the strict medical requirements to be recommended for surgery.
Peterson found that Campbell has the most severe form of gender dysphoria, in which the presence of male genitalia on her body causes particularly severe anguish.
He noted that it could take a year to schedule an appointment with the one qualified surgeon in the state, and suggested DOC could move Campbell to the main women’s prison in the meantime.
The DOC took the position that Campbell met all the criteria for gender confirmation surgery except having practiced living as a woman in “real life,” which it said was impossible while residing in a men’s prison.
Peterson said denying the surgery by summarily citing policy amounted to deliberate indifference of her serious medical needs, a violation of the Eighth Amendment.
He gave particular consideration to the testimony of Cynthia Osborne, a social worker and sex therapist who has evaluated more than 200 inmates of gender dysphoria. She concluded the ‘real life experience’ requirement before surgery may not be so important or relevant for someone like Campbell, who had experienced it before prison, has done all that she can to successfully live as a woman for several years in prison, and faces many more years of incarceration.
Peterson noted that the DOC had requested that, if Peterson ordered surgery, he first require Campbell to live for a year at Taycheedah Correctional Institution, the state’s largest women’s prison first.
“That request came as a surprise, because previously the DOC designated any inmate with a penis to a male prison, regardless of gender identity or expression,” Peterson wrote.
“I decline to impose any further prerequisites on Campbell’s sex reassignment surgery; she has waited long enough.”
That doesn’t mean surgery will happen soon though. According to Peterson’s order, there’s only one surgeon in Wisconsin qualified to perform the operation, and it could be a year before Campbell’s surgery. Ultimately, the surgeon must also agree that the procedure is necessary.
Campbell was represented for free by lawyers from Husch Blackwell, led by Tom Henegen.


newspunch--2020-12-23--In His Holiday Message Biden Warns ‘Our Darkest Days Are Ahead of Us’ In Fight Against Coronavirus

Biden told Americans tha the worst was yet to come in the fight against the coronavirus pandemic .
Breitbart reports : Reading from prepared remarks , at a briefing that was billed as a message to the American people for the holidays , Biden said : “ One thing I promise you , about my leadership during this crisis : I ’ m going tell it to you straight .
I ’ m going tell you the truth , and here is the simple truth .
Our darkest days in the battle against COVID are ahead of us , not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prepare ourselves , to steel our spines , as frustrating as it is to hear .
It ’ s going to take patience , persistence , and determination to beat this virus.
” Biden ’ s tone was a marked change from that of President Donald Trump , who has told Americans since the spring that the country is about to turn the corner in its fight against the disease .
The president-elect did not seem to think that the rollout of vaccines , the passage of coronavirus relief legislation , and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ signs .
He seemed determined to set expectations low — and to make the case for renewed stimulus spending when he takes office in January .

Joe Biden gave a bleak holiday message during a press briefing on Tuesday.
Biden told Americans tha the worst was yet to come in the fight against the coronavirus pandemic.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Breitbart reports: Reading from prepared remarks, at a briefing that was billed as a message to the American people for the holidays, Biden said:
“One thing I promise you, about my leadership during this crisis: I’m going tell it to you straight. I’m going tell you the truth, and here is the simple truth. Our darkest days in the battle against COVID are ahead of us, not behind us. So we need to prepare ourselves, to steel our spines, as frustrating as it is to hear. It’s going to take patience, persistence, and determination to beat this virus.”
Biden’s tone was a marked change from that of President Donald Trump, who has told Americans since the spring that the country is about to turn the corner in its fight against the disease.
The president-elect did not seem to think that the rollout of vaccines, the passage of coronavirus relief legislation, and the rapid pace of economic growth were good signs. He seemed determined to set expectations low — and to make the case for renewed stimulus spending when he takes office in January.


newspunch--2020-12-23--Maxine Waters Wants Trump ‘Marched Out’ Of The White House By The Military Or Secret Service

Maxine Waters told MSNBC this week that she would like to see President Trump “ marched out ” of the White House either by the military or the Secret Service .
Waters said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi felt the same way : “ We want him out of there .
I know Nancy Pelosi is counting down the hours .
She told me that also.
” Pelosi had declared she was so frustrated that Trump was still in the White House that she planned to personally drag him out by his hair .
Breitbart reports : Anchor Ayman Mohyeldin said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lot of Democrats counting down the ways .
I wanted to read something Speaker Pelosi said about Trump .
She said she ’ s counting down the hours until he ’ s gone .
‘ I plan to pull him out of there by his hair , his little hands , and his feet.
’ I ’ m curious to get your thoughts .
Is that what a lot of Democrats are thinking right now about President Trump that he ’ s got to get out of there one way or the other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ want him out , and we keep hearing these rumors about everything that he ’ s doing to try and stay in .
We ’ ve even heard rumors he said he ’ s not leaving .
We want him out , and to tell you the truth , I don ’ t know exactly what you do with the president who has lost an election , and you have a new person who has been elected to the presidency , and the old president is not wanting to leave .
I don @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : She continued , “ My understanding or what I would like to do is I would like to see him marched out of there .
I don ’ t know whether it ’ s the secret service or whether it ’ s military or what have you , but he can ’ t stay .
He can ’ t claim , you know , ownership of the White House .
He doesn ’ t want to leave , and he ’ s doing everything possible , including talking about martial law , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out of there .
I know Nancy Pelosi is counting down the hours .
She told me that also .
”

Maxine Waters told MSNBC this week that she would like to see President Trump “marched out” of the White House either by the military or the Secret Service.
Waters said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi felt the same way: “We want him out of there. I know Nancy Pelosi is counting down the hours. She told me that also.”
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Pelosi had declared she was so frustrated that Trump was still in the White House that she planned to personally drag him out by his hair.
Breitbart reports: Anchor Ayman Mohyeldin said, “I know there is a lot of Democrats counting down the ways. I wanted to read something Speaker Pelosi said about Trump. She said she’s counting down the hours until he’s gone. ‘I plan to pull him out of there by his hair, his little hands, and his feet.’ I’m curious to get your thoughts. Is that what a lot of Democrats are thinking right now about President Trump that he’s got to get out of there one way or the other?”
Waters said, “We want him out, and we keep hearing these rumors about everything that he’s doing to try and stay in. We’ve even heard rumors he said he’s not leaving. We want him out, and to tell you the truth, I don’t know exactly what you do with the president who has lost an election, and you have a new person who has been elected to the presidency, and the old president is not wanting to leave. I don’t know what you do.:
She continued, “My understanding or what I would like to do is I would like to see him marched out of there. I don’t know whether it’s the secret service or whether it’s military or what have you, but he can’t stay. He can’t claim, you know, ownership of the White House. He doesn’t want to leave, and he’s doing everything possible, including talking about martial law, etc., etc. We want him out of there. I know Nancy Pelosi is counting down the hours. She told me that also.”


newspunch--2020-12-24--President Trump Triggers Libs by Pardoning Roger Stone & Paul Manafort

President Trump issued a slew of Christmas pardons on Wednesday night , triggering Democrats who were angry at him for pardoning Paul Manafort and Roger Stone .
Thegatewaypundit.com reports : Manafort was sentenced to 7 years in prison for tax evasion and other crimes stemming from his Ukrainian lobbying .
In May of this year Manafort was released to home confinement for the remainder of his sentence .
Crooked and corrupt Manhattan DA Cy Vance announced state charges against Manafort back in March of 2019 just MINUTES after the former Trump campaign chairman was sentenced for the second time on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to issue Manafort a pardon .
However , a judge last December tossed out New York State charges of mortgage fraud against Paul Manafort because of ‘ double jeopardy ’ laws .
Kushner was previously charged with tax evasion and witness tampering .
20 other people who were pardoned committed various cyber crimes and mail fraud .
On Tuesday President Trump pardoned George Papadopoulos and Dutch , London-based lawyer Alex Van Der Zwaan who also pleaded guilty to making a false statement after being indicted by Mueller .
Papadopoulos was hunted down by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ goons for the ‘ crime ’ of working on Trump ’ s 2016 campaign .
And just like that , Mueller ’ s 2 year inquisition goes up in flames .

880 SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
President Trump issued a slew of Christmas pardons on Wednesday night, triggering Democrats who were angry at him for pardoning Paul Manafort and Roger Stone.
Trump had previously only commuted Stone’s sentence.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Trump’s campaign manager Paul Manafort was viciously hunted down by Mueller’s gang of angry Democrats after he helped Trump defeat Hillary in 2016. JOIN THE FIGHT: BECOME A CITIZEN JOURNALIST TODAY!
Thegatewaypundit.com reports: Manafort was sentenced to 7 years in prison for tax evasion and other crimes stemming from his Ukrainian lobbying.
In May of this year Manafort was released to home confinement for the remainder of his sentence.
Crooked and corrupt Manhattan DA Cy Vance announced state charges against Manafort back in March of 2019 just MINUTES after the former Trump campaign chairman was sentenced for the second time on federal charges just in case Trump were to issue Manafort a pardon.
However, a judge last December tossed out New York State charges of mortgage fraud against Paul Manafort because of ‘double jeopardy’ laws.
President Trump on Wednesday also pardoned Jared Kushner’s father, Charles Kushner.
Kushner was previously charged with tax evasion and witness tampering.
20 other people who were pardoned committed various cyber crimes and mail fraud.
On Tuesday President Trump pardoned George Papadopoulos and Dutch, London-based lawyer Alex Van Der Zwaan who also pleaded guilty to making a false statement after being indicted by Mueller.
Papadopoulos was hunted down by the Deep State and Mueller’s goons for the ‘crime’ of working on Trump’s 2016 campaign.


newspunch--2020-12-24--Disgraced Democrat Ex-Rep and Sexual Predator Katie Hill Sues Daily Mail Over #MeToo Expose

Attorney and professor Jonathan Turley reported that the exposure of Hill ’ s sexual misconduct with a staffer and ongoing abuse of her husband has left her embarrassed and seeking revenge .
A judge ordered Heslep “ to stay at least 100 yards away from Hill , Hill ’ s mother and sister and Hill ’ s goat , dog and horse.
” In her suit against RedState and the Daily Mail , Hill is seeking “ unspecified damages for emotional distress and violation of state law for distribution of intimate personal material without Hill ’ s consent , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s parent company , Salem Media Group Inc. , Mail Media Inc. , RedState deputy managing editor Jennifer Van Laar , and Joseph Messina , a California-based radio show host .
Hill is targeting the site after it published photos of a nude Hill in compromising positions .
“ Deciding who is allowed to see our naked bodies is an essential right , ” Hill said , according to Turley .
In October , several of Hill ’ s former congressional staffers posted to her official Twitter account after it was revealed a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s life , Breitbart News previously reported .
In a string of messages , which have since been deleted , Hill ’ s former aides said they were “ disappointed ” such a project would be produced , and were concerned it would position Hill as merely a victim in a case that includes Hill in a “ throuple ” involving her then-husband and a female campaign staffer .
“ What happened to Katie Hill shouldn ’ t happen to anyone .
But , this moment requires more nuance , as Katie Hill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is also one of workplace abuse and harassment , ” they said in one tweet .
“ Katie Hill can be both a victim and perpetrator , ” they wrote , alluding to Hill ’ s allegations against her husband .
“ And , staff can experience severe consequences for speaking out against their powerful boss.
” “ Katie Hill was never investigated by the House Ethics Committee , nor has she been held accountable by anyone other than herself , ” her former staffers wrote in another post .
“ Katie took @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s former staffers alleged in another message .
“ She caused immense harm to the people who worked for her , many of whom were young women just beginning their careers in politics.
” “ Believe us when we say : it ’ s not only about who starts it , it ’ s also about who ends it , ” the anonymous ex-employees said .
“ And , while Katie is certainly the survivor of abuse , we are not confident that she sufficiently acted to end her own patterns of @ @ @ @ @ @

Disgraced former Democrat Rep. Katie Hill is suing the Daily Mail for reporting on her #MeToo scandal where she sexually harassed and abused female staffers.
Attorney and professor Jonathan Turley reported that the exposure of Hill’s sexual misconduct with a staffer and ongoing abuse of her husband has left her embarrassed and seeking revenge.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
In early December, Hill obtained a temporary restraining order against her husband Kenneth Heslep “after Hill alleged her ex had subjected her to 15 years of abuse, including choking her unconscious, threatening her with a gun, abusing her pets, and releasing sexually explicit pictures that ended her political career,” according to NBC News. JOIN THE FIGHT: BECOME A CITIZEN JOURNALIST TODAY!
Breitbart.com reports: Claiming she had considered pursuing one “many times over the years,” Hill said, “At this point, I am finally seeking a restraining order because I am afraid that he will not give up until I am dead.”
A judge ordered Heslep “to stay at least 100 yards away from Hill, Hill’s mother and sister and Hill’s goat, dog and horse.”
In her suit against RedState and the Daily Mail, Hill is seeking “unspecified damages for emotional distress and violation of state law for distribution of intimate personal material without Hill’s consent,” Turley reported, and named RedState’s parent company, Salem Media Group Inc., Mail Media Inc., RedState deputy managing editor Jennifer Van Laar, and Joseph Messina, a California-based radio show host.
Hill is targeting the site after it published photos of a nude Hill in compromising positions.
“Deciding who is allowed to see our naked bodies is an essential right,” Hill said, according to Turley.
In October, several of Hill’s former congressional staffers posted to her official Twitter account after it was revealed a movie would be made about Hill’s life, Breitbart News previously reported.
In a string of messages, which have since been deleted, Hill’s former aides said they were “disappointed” such a project would be produced, and were concerned it would position Hill as merely a victim in a case that includes Hill in a “throuple” involving her then-husband and a female campaign staffer.
“What happened to Katie Hill shouldn’t happen to anyone. But, this moment requires more nuance, as Katie Hill’s story — our story — is also one of workplace abuse and harassment,” they said in one tweet.
“Katie Hill can be both a victim and perpetrator,” they wrote, alluding to Hill’s allegations against her husband. “And, staff can experience severe consequences for speaking out against their powerful boss.”
“Katie Hill was never investigated by the House Ethics Committee, nor has she been held accountable by anyone other than herself,” her former staffers wrote in another post.
“Katie took advantage of her subordinates,” Hill’s former staffers alleged in another message. “She caused immense harm to the people who worked for her, many of whom were young women just beginning their careers in politics.”
“Believe us when we say: it’s not only about who starts it, it’s also about who ends it,” the anonymous ex-employees said. “And, while Katie is certainly the survivor of abuse, we are not confident that she sufficiently acted to end her own patterns of inappropriate and abusive behavior.”


newspunch--2020-12-24--Dave Rubin: Big Tech to Ban ALL Conservatives in 2021 – ‘The Great PURGE Is Coming’

If Democrats gain control of the White House and Senate , social media giants will completely purge conservatives from all of their platforms , Dave Rubin has warned .
In a recent interview , the host of the Rubin Report warned that 2021 will be the year conservatives and independent thinkers cease to exist online .
“ If Biden gets in , and especially if [ Democrats ] have the Senate — Trump was the last thing that was stopping Big Tech from lowering the boom — but I think 2021 will be the year of the bannings .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It ’ ll be more algorithmic depressions , deboosting .
shadowbanning , that sort of thing , but then they ’ ll start picking people off.
” Breitbart.com reports : “ Big Tech has shown us what it is , ” Rubin remarked , noting ubiquitous political censorship across social media suppressing information and inquiry about election integrity following November ’ s general and presidential elections .
Rubin recalled , “ Two weeks before the election — this is a little insider baseball stuff , but they changed the way you retweet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have to hit retweet twice to retweet instead of once — and and the reason they did that , obviously , was they were watching out for certain things they didn ’ t want going viral , perhaps things exposing fraud or whatever it might be after the election.
” Rubin added , “ They show you how fraudulent right in front of your face , they ’ re doing it in plain sight.
” Rubin cofounded Locals , a website describing itself as “ a subscription-based community platform ” that is “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ We are disconnected from Big Tech , ” Rubin said of Locals .
“ You own [ your content ] .
You control it .
It ’ s all yours .
We ’ re just giving you the tools to do what you think is right.
” A Republican Senate majority may be a bulwark against the coordinated push for leftist-driven digital censorship between the Democrat Party and Big Tech .
Rubin determined , “ Putting aside whatever your feelings are on any particular policy , if there is any hope for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have a little push and pull , that will not be completely dominated by the Democrats — going on the assumptions that Biden is going to be president , which I ’ m still not even sure of , but going on that assumption — we need a push and pull , right now.
” “ If [ Democrats ] take the Senate , too , the radical thing that we are all fighting — because it ’ s basically everyone versus the wokesters — the wokesters will have nothing to stop them @ @ @ @ @

If Democrats gain control of the White House and Senate, social media giants will completely purge conservatives from all of their platforms, Dave Rubin has warned. In a recent interview, the host of the Rubin Report warned that 2021 will be the year conservatives and independent thinkers cease to exist online. BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ “The ship has sailed with Big Tech,” Rubin warned. JOIN THE FIGHT: BECOME A CITIZEN JOURNALIST TODAY! “If Biden gets in, and especially if [Democrats] have the Senate — Trump was the last thing that was stopping Big Tech from lowering the boom — but I think 2021 will be the year of the bannings. It’ll be soft bannings at first. It’ll be more algorithmic depressions, deboosting. shadowbanning, that sort of thing, but then they’ll start picking people off.” Breitbart.com reports: “Big Tech has shown us what it is,” Rubin remarked, noting ubiquitous political censorship across social media suppressing information and inquiry about election integrity following November’s general and presidential elections.
Rubin recalled, “Two weeks before the election — this is a little insider baseball stuff, but they changed the way you retweet, remember that, where you suddenly have to hit retweet twice to retweet instead of once — and and the reason they did that, obviously, was they were watching out for certain things they didn’t want going viral, perhaps things exposing fraud or whatever it might be after the election.”
Rubin added, “They show you how fraudulent right in front of your face, they’re doing it in plain sight.”
Rubin cofounded Locals, a website describing itself as “a subscription-based community platform” that is “made for creators, by creators.”
“We are disconnected from Big Tech,” Rubin said of Locals. “You own [your content]. You control it. It’s all yours. We’re just giving you the tools to do what you think is right.”
A Republican Senate majority may be a bulwark against the coordinated push for leftist-driven digital censorship between the Democrat Party and Big Tech.
Rubin determined, “Putting aside whatever your feelings are on any particular policy, if there is any hope for us to have a government that will have a little push and pull, that will not be completely dominated by the Democrats — going on the assumptions that Biden is going to be president, which I’m still not even sure of, but going on that assumption — we need a push and pull, right now.”
“If [Democrats] take the Senate, too, the radical thing that we are all fighting — because it’s basically everyone versus the wokesters — the wokesters will have nothing to stop them,” Rubin concluded.


newspunch--2020-12-24--WHO Changes Definition of “Herd Immunity”: ‘Immunity Comes Solely From Vaccines’

The World Health Organization has changed the definition of “ herd immunity , ” eradicating the pre-COVID consensus that it could be achieved by allowing the virus to spread through a population , and declaring that herd immunity solely comes from vaccines .
The change happened on the WHO ’ s website , in a section entitled ‘ Coronavirus disease ( COVID-19 ) : Serology , antibodies and immunity ’ .
The original WHO definition ( archived here ) states that herd immunity “ happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t been infected , or in whom an infection hasn ’ t triggered an immune response , they are protected because people around them who are immune can act as buffers between them and an infected person.
” Summit.news reports : The original definition fails to identify the pre-COVID consensus on what is meant by “ herd immunity , ” which is when a population becomes protected against a virus because enough people have been infected with it to create community immunity .
However , the WHO ’ s updated version is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ immunity can only be achieved by mass vaccination programs .
“ ‘ Herd immunity ’ , also known as ‘ population immunity ’ , is a concept used for vaccination , in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached , ” states the WHO website , adding , “ Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus , not by exposing them to it.
” “ ‘ Herd immunity ’ exists when a high percentage of the population is vaccinated , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the original meaning of “ herd immunity , ” which is when a population becomes immune to a virus by being exposed to it .
By changing the definition of “ herd immunity , ” the WHO is literally re-writing hundreds of years of scientific understanding as to what the term truly means in an apparent effort to silence any argument that herd immunity would have been a better approach to fighting COVID-19 than lockdowns and social distancing .

The World Health Organization has changed the definition of “herd immunity,” eradicating the pre-COVID consensus that it could be achieved by allowing the virus to spread through a population, and declaring that herd immunity solely comes from vaccines.
The change happened on the WHO’s website, in a section entitled ‘Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Serology, antibodies and immunity’. BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ The original WHO definition (archived here) states that herd immunity “happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection. This means that even people who haven’t been infected, or in whom an infection hasn’t triggered an immune response, they are protected because people around them who are immune can act as buffers between them and an infected person.” JOIN THE FIGHT: BECOME A CITIZEN JOURNALIST TODAY!
Summit.news reports: The original definition fails to identify the pre-COVID consensus on what is meant by “herd immunity,” which is when a population becomes protected against a virus because enough people have been infected with it to create community immunity.
However, the WHO’s updated version is even more extreme, insisting that herd immunity can only be achieved by mass vaccination programs.
“‘Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity’, is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached,” states the WHO website, adding, “Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it.”
“‘Herd immunity’ exists when a high percentage of the population is vaccinated,” states the website, completely omitting the original meaning of “herd immunity,” which is when a population becomes immune to a virus by being exposed to it.
By changing the definition of “herd immunity,” the WHO is literally re-writing hundreds of years of scientific understanding as to what the term truly means in an apparent effort to silence any argument that herd immunity would have been a better approach to fighting COVID-19 than lockdowns and social distancing.


newspunch--2020-12-24--Nasty Nancy: Trump to Blame for Nearly ALL COVID Deaths

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi claimed that most of the COVID-related deaths in America were because of President Trump .
“ Given all of the demand still out there that you ’ ve talked about , how large a package would you like to see President-Elect Biden introduce next year as President and how much money for state and local aid do you think should be in that package ?
” “ Well , we ’ ll make a judgment all the time about what the needs are.
” “ I think that when you see the surge and the Coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just think it ’ s over or that we can ignore it , ” Pelosi said .
“ The denial , the delay , the distortion , the calling it a hoax has caused hundreds of thousands of deaths , not all of them attributed to President Trump , but most of them that could have been avoided , ” she added .
“ So , this is a matter of life and death : the lives of the American people and the livelihood of our economy and their economic security , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ll make a judgment as we go forward as to what has changed and what — what may be for the better or maybe for , the worse as we go forward .
”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi claimed that most of the COVID-related deaths in America were because of President Trump.
Pelosi was asked by a reporter:
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
“Given all of the demand still out there that you’ve talked about, how large a package would you like to see President-Elect Biden introduce next year as President and how much money for state and local aid do you think should be in that package?”
Pelosi angrily replied:
“Well, we’ll make a judgment all the time about what the needs are.”
“I think that when you see the surge and the Coronavirus, you know that we cannot just think it’s over or that we can ignore it,” Pelosi said.
“The denial, the delay, the distortion, the calling it a hoax has caused hundreds of thousands of deaths, not all of them attributed to President Trump, but most of them that could have been avoided,” she added.
“So, this is a matter of life and death: the lives of the American people and the livelihood of our economy and their economic security,” she continued.
“So we’ll make a judgment as we go forward as to what has changed and what — what may be for the better or maybe for, the worse as we go forward.”


newspunch--2020-12-24--South Africa’s Chief Justice Links Coronovirus Vaccines To A ‘Satanic Agenda’

South Africa ’ s chief justice Mogoeng Mogoeng has rejected concerns that he could be endangering people ’ s health by linking coronavirus vaccines to a “ satanic agenda ” .
The senior judge said people should be spared any vaccine that sought to “ advance a satanic agenda of the mark of the beast ” .
Mogoeng claims he is not against vaccinations , but is against those that may ‘ corrupt ’ DNA and has called on God to destroy it .
Worries have quickly surfaced that people might avoid vaccination as a result of Mogoeng ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ South Africa began hosting the continent ’ s first coronavirus vaccine trial , anti-vaccine activists protested against Africans being used as test subjects .
Two decades ago , the then-president Thabo Mbeki questioned whether HIV caused Aids , which has ravaged the country .
Mogoeng , who frequently displays his Christian faith while performing his duties , prayed at a public event on Thursday that people should be spared any vaccine that sought to “ advance a satanic agenda of the mark of the beast ” .
Addressing questions about this at a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ judiciary report , he said : “ If there is any vaccine that is deliberately intended to do harm to people , that vaccine must never see the light of day .
I cry unto God to stop it.
” Mogoeng added : “ I don ’ t think the vaccine must ever be compulsory … You can ’ t impose a vaccine on people .
Why should you ?
” The Sunday Times Daily news site quoted Barry Schoub , a virology professor at Wits University and head of a ministerial advisory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ It is unfortunate that someone of that stature is misleading people because vaccines are such a major part of controlling this epidemic and it is unfortunate that someone with such influence is opposing efforts to control it.
” But Mogoeng said he would not be silenced : “ I don ’ t care about the consequences .
We ’ ve been quiet for far too long , toeing the line .
”

1.3k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
South Africa’s chief justice Mogoeng Mogoeng has rejected concerns that he could be endangering people’s health by linking coronavirus vaccines to a “satanic agenda”.
The senior judge said people should be spared any vaccine that sought to “advance a satanic agenda of the mark of the beast”.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Mogoeng claims he is not against vaccinations, but is against those that may ‘corrupt’ DNA and has called on God to destroy it.
Worries have quickly surfaced that people might avoid vaccination as a result of Mogoeng’s comments.
The Guardian reports: After South Africa began hosting the continent’s first coronavirus vaccine trial, anti-vaccine activists protested against Africans being used as test subjects.
Two decades ago, the then-president Thabo Mbeki questioned whether HIV caused Aids, which has ravaged the country.
Mogoeng, who frequently displays his Christian faith while performing his duties, prayed at a public event on Thursday that people should be spared any vaccine that sought to “advance a satanic agenda of the mark of the beast”.
Addressing questions about this at a news conference on Friday to release a judiciary report, he said: “If there is any vaccine that is deliberately intended to do harm to people, that vaccine must never see the light of day. I cry unto God to stop it.”
Mogoeng added: “I don’t think the vaccine must ever be compulsory … You can’t impose a vaccine on people. Why should you?”
The Sunday Times Daily news site quoted Barry Schoub, a virology professor at Wits University and head of a ministerial advisory committee on Covid-19, as saying: “It is unfortunate that someone of that stature is misleading people because vaccines are such a major part of controlling this epidemic and it is unfortunate that someone with such influence is opposing efforts to control it.”
But Mogoeng said he would not be silenced: “I don’t care about the consequences. We’ve been quiet for far too long, toeing the line.”


newspunch--2020-12-24--Drug Overdoses Killed Almost Four Times More People Than Covid In San Francisco

Drug overdoses have killed almost four times more people than Covid-19 in San Francisco this year .
Yet , despite the official figures , the government continues to hand out free needles to addicts .
Summit News reports : A record 621 people died of drug overdoses in San Francisco so far this year , a staggering number that far outpaces the 173 deaths from COVID-19 the city has seen thus far , ” reports the San Francisco Chronicle .
“ Many people overdosed in low-income apartment buildings and in city-funded hotel rooms for the homeless .
Others died on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the city .
Despite the deaths , the government continues to hand out some 5.8 million free syringes a year to drug users .
It also appears as though lockdowns have exacerbated illegal drug use throughout the state of California .
“ Other areas of the state have seen a spike in drug use and overdoses amid lockdowns , including in Los Angeles County , ” reports the Washington Examiner .
“ In 2013 in the county , fentanyl accounted for 3 % of drug-related deaths .
At the start of 2020 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the area , and that number jumped to 51 % when lockdowns were enacted in March.
” San Francisco ’ s homeless drug user problem is so chronic that in 2019 , residents began desperately installing boulders on the side of streets in an effort to prevent camping .
A knock-on effect of the massive increase in the city ’ s homeless population has been the routine sight of feces on the street .
A 2019 study discovered that each case of poop that has to be cleaned up on the streets @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 32 dollars , with 118,352 recorded reports of human feces since 2011 .
As we document in the video below , San Francisco is a shit-stained cesspool that is only getting worse , a situation increasingly being mirrored in other major Democrat-run cities across America .

Drug overdoses have killed almost four times more people than Covid-19 in San Francisco this year.
Yet, despite the official figures, the government continues to hand out free needles to addicts.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Summit News reports: A record 621 people died of drug overdoses in San Francisco so far this year, a staggering number that far outpaces the 173 deaths from COVID-19 the city has seen thus far,” reports the San Francisco Chronicle.
“Many people overdosed in low-income apartment buildings and in city-funded hotel rooms for the homeless. Others died on sidewalks, in alleyways and parks around the city.
Despite the deaths, the government continues to hand out some 5.8 million free syringes a year to drug users.
It also appears as though lockdowns have exacerbated illegal drug use throughout the state of California.
“Other areas of the state have seen a spike in drug use and overdoses amid lockdowns, including in Los Angeles County,” reports the Washington Examiner.
“In 2013 in the county, fentanyl accounted for 3% of drug-related deaths. At the start of 2020, 42% of drug deaths were fentanyl-related in the area, and that number jumped to 51% when lockdowns were enacted in March.”
San Francisco’s homeless drug user problem is so chronic that in 2019, residents began desperately installing boulders on the side of streets in an effort to prevent camping.
A knock-on effect of the massive increase in the city’s homeless population has been the routine sight of feces on the street.
A 2019 study discovered that each case of poop that has to be cleaned up on the streets of San Francisco costs the taxpayer $32 dollars, with 118,352 recorded reports of human feces since 2011.
As we document in the video below, San Francisco is a shit-stained cesspool that is only getting worse, a situation increasingly being mirrored in other major Democrat-run cities across America.


newspunch--2020-12-26--Rudy Giuliani: ‘Trust Me, Sh*t Is Gonna Hit the Fan After Christmas’

The fight for the election is far from over , and Americans are about to wake up to a very surprising late Christmas gift , Rudy Giuliani claims .
During his most recent ‘ Common Sense ’ discussion Giuliani declared the following : “ You ’ re going to find out all at once .
It ’ s going to be very shocking to the country.
” Thegatewaypundit.com reports : The people at “ WeLoveTrump.com ” share this about the current state of the 2020 Presidential race : We ’ ve been telling you for weeks .
The White House @ @ @ @ @ @ @ More Republican representatives are on the record claiming they will contest the electoral votes… Dan Scavino has been posting increasingly cryptic messages on Twitter… And Kamala Harris STILL hasn ’ t left her Senate seat !
Now , Rudy Giuliani has given an explanation on the voter fraud : “ You ’ re going to find out all at once .
It ’ s going to be very shocking to the country.
” There is hope .
We must continue to fight and pray for Trump and our country .
President Trump crushed @ @ @ @ @ @ @

8.2k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
The fight for the election is far from over, and Americans are about to wake up to a very surprising late Christmas gift, Rudy Giuliani claims.
During his most recent ‘Common Sense’ discussion Giuliani declared the following:
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
“You’re going to find out all at once. It’s going to be very shocking to the country.”
Thegatewaypundit.com reports: The people at “WeLoveTrump.com” share this about the current state of the 2020 Presidential race:
We’ve been telling you for weeks. Let’s put 2 + 2 together. The White House has instructed Trump staff to STOP packing… The Pentagon has stopped giving Joe Biden intelligence briefings… More Republican representatives are on the record claiming they will contest the electoral votes… Dan Scavino has been posting increasingly cryptic messages on Twitter… And Kamala Harris STILL hasn’t left her Senate seat! Now, Rudy Giuliani has given an explanation on the voter fraud: “You’re going to find out all at once. It’s going to be very shocking to the country.”
There is hope. We must continue to fight and pray for Trump and our country. President Trump crushed Joe Biden in the 2020 election.


newspunch--2020-12-26--Andrew Weissmann: Manafort, Stone Can Now Be Forced to Testify Against Trump

Andrew Weissmann , one of Mueller ’ s main attack dogs during the Russia witch hunt , claims that Paul Manafort and Roger Stone can now be compelled to testify against President Trump in an upcoming “ criminal trial.
” Weissmann was interviewed by Russia conspiracy theoretician Rachel Maddow on Wednesday .
“ The Fifth Amendment issue — that the pardon removes the stain of a conviction , but a pardoned person — once a person has been pardoned for specific crimes , they can ’ t escape having to testify about anything that comes within the scope of their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , “ Absolutely .
So you know , this is the kind of thing , when I hear this news , I put on my sort of former Brooklyn prosecutor hat of , ‘ okay , what can we do ?
’ And there are actually two things that the next attorney general can do with respect to the president because the president has a very , very broad power to pardon , but he can not pardon in exchange for something .
In other words , there can not be a bribe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The president faces criminal exposure for obstruction of the Mueller investigation .
And what we ’ re seeing in the last few days is , basically , a confession .
You know , this is such strong evidence of obstruction .
He ’ s carrying out the dangled pardons that you referred to he is now carrying out in real-time .
And one of the things you can do as a federal prosecutor is you can put Paul Manafort and Roger Stone into the grand jury and ask them questions .
Obviously , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the president can ’ t interfere with this .
And you can ask them questions about , what were your communications with the White House ?
Why did you lie for the president ?
A whole series of questions.
” He added , “ Now , if Paul Manafort or Roger Stone were to assert the Fifth Amendment at that point , and they may have an argument for it , you can immunize them and force them to testify .
You ’ ll be no worse off than you are now.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and a number of other people can be put in the grand jury and asked about the president to beef-up a future case against the president .
”

Andrew Weissmann, one of Mueller’s main attack dogs during the Russia witch hunt, claims that Paul Manafort and Roger Stone can now be compelled to testify against President Trump in an upcoming “criminal trial.”
Weissmann was interviewed by Russia conspiracy theoretician Rachel Maddow on Wednesday.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Maddow began by declaring:
“The Fifth Amendment issue — that the pardon removes the stain of a conviction, but a pardoned person — once a person has been pardoned for specific crimes, they can’t escape having to testify about anything that comes within the scope of their pardon in the future.”
Weissmann responded, “Absolutely. So you know, this is the kind of thing, when I hear this news, I put on my sort of former Brooklyn prosecutor hat of, ‘okay, what can we do?’ And there are actually two things that the next attorney general can do with respect to the president because the president has a very, very broad power to pardon, but he cannot pardon in exchange for something. In other words, there can not be a bribe or a quid pro quo.”
He continued:
“The president faces criminal exposure for obstruction of the Mueller investigation. And what we’re seeing in the last few days is, basically, a confession. You know, this is such strong evidence of obstruction. He’s carrying out the dangled pardons that you referred to he is now carrying out in real-time. And one of the things you can do as a federal prosecutor is you can put Paul Manafort and Roger Stone into the grand jury and ask them questions. Obviously, you would wait until January 20 so that the president can’t interfere with this. And you can ask them questions about, what were your communications with the White House? Why did you lie for the president? A whole series of questions.”
He added, “Now, if Paul Manafort or Roger Stone were to assert the Fifth Amendment at that point, and they may have an argument for it, you can immunize them and force them to testify. You’ll be no worse off than you are now.”
“Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, and a number of other people can be put in the grand jury and asked about the president to beef-up a future case against the president.”
WATCH: