newspunch--2020-01-16--Giddy Nancy Uses Over a Dozen Commemorative Pens to Sign ‘Sad’ Articles of Impeachment

Nancy Pelosi declared herself “ sad ” as she used over a dozen commemorative pens to sign the articles of impeachment against President Trump on Wednesday , before handing them out like prizes to fellow Democrats .
According to the House Speaker , the occasion was “ so sad , so tragic for our country.
” Pelosi told reporters that the occasion marked a “ difficult time in our country ’ s history.
” She then approached a table with the impeachment documents , and two dishes full of “ impeachment pens ” for her to use in the spectacle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rolled , and signed the articles , one for “ abuse of power ” and another for “ obstruction of Congress.
” She applied each pen , paused every few seconds as cameras captured the show , switched pens , and then continued .
Breitbart.com reports : The two dishes were swapped out and replaced with two new ones after the first article of impeachment had been signed — presumably , different pens for different articles .
Despite pronouncing herself “ sad , ” Pelosi smiled throughout the signing .
She then handed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democratic Party caucus in the House , including House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff ( D-CA ) , House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler ( D-NY ) , House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Rep. Eliot Engel ( D-NY ) , and others .
She also posed for smiling photographs with the pens .
It is unclear if the ceremony had any actual meaning , or whether it was merely a pantomime for the media .
Eric Wasson of Bloomberg News reported that the Senate would not actually receive the articles until @ @ @ @ @ @ @ responded , mocking Pelosi for “ souvenir pens served up on silver platters ” : Pelosi and her party insisted on rushing impeachment through the House — even declining to call key witnesses , or to pursue them through the courts — because they insisted that it was urgent the president be removed from office to prevent him from soliciting foreign interference in the 2020 election .
They then refused to deliver the articles of impeachment to the Senate for four weeks as they attempted to exert pressure on Republicans to adopt their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

2k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Nancy Pelosi declared herself “sad” as she used over a dozen commemorative pens to sign the articles of impeachment against President Trump on Wednesday, before handing them out like prizes to fellow Democrats.
According to the House Speaker, the occasion was “so sad, so tragic for our country.” Pelosi told reporters that the occasion marked a “difficult time in our country’s history.”
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
She then approached a table with the impeachment documents, and two dishes full of “impeachment pens” for her to use in the spectacle.
Pelosi then sat, as cameras rolled, and signed the articles, one for “abuse of power” and another for “obstruction of Congress.” She applied each pen, paused every few seconds as cameras captured the show, switched pens, and then continued.
Breitbart.com reports: The two dishes were swapped out and replaced with two new ones after the first article of impeachment had been signed — presumably, different pens for different articles.
Despite pronouncing herself “sad,” Pelosi smiled throughout the signing.
She then handed out the pens to leaders of the Democratic Party caucus in the House, including House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY), House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Rep. Eliot Engel (D-NY), and others.
She also posed for smiling photographs with the pens.
It is unclear if the ceremony had any actual meaning, or whether it was merely a pantomime for the media. Eric Wasson of Bloomberg News reported that the Senate would not actually receive the articles until Thursday.
McConnell’s office says Senate will not actually be receiving impeachment articles today despite House plans for a procession. Will receive tomorrow — Erik Wasson (@elwasson) January 15, 2020
Update: The White House responded, mocking Pelosi for “souvenir pens served up on silver platters”:
Nancy Pelosi’s souvenir pens served up on silver platters to sign the sham articles of impeachment…She was so somber as she gave them away to people like prizes. https://t.co/RMOiNeoMu0 — Kayleigh McEnany 45 Archived (@PressSec45) January 15, 2020
Pelosi and her party insisted on rushing impeachment through the House — even declining to call key witnesses, or to pursue them through the courts — because they insisted that it was urgent the president be removed from office to prevent him from soliciting foreign interference in the 2020 election.
They then refused to deliver the articles of impeachment to the Senate for four weeks as they attempted to exert pressure on Republicans to adopt their terms for a trial, without success.


newspunch--2020-01-17--Nasty Nancy: Democrats Will Remove Trump From White House This Year ‘One Way Or Another’

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ( D-CA ) has declared that President Donald Trump will be removed from the White House by Democrats this year “ one way or another.
” During an interview with ABC News , Pelosi claimed that Democrats may “ have him removed sooner ” than the November general election .
“ Let ’ s be optimistic about the future , ” Speaker Pelosi stated .
“ A future that will not have Donald Trump in the White House , one way or another.
“ “ Ten months from now , we will have an election , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ removed sooner .
But again , he will be impeached forever , ” Pelosi concluded .
Rep. Steve Scalise ( R-LA ) seized on the remarks and posted a clip of the interview on Twitter .
Scalise denounced Pelosi ’ s comments and said they prove the impeachment push against the president is nothing more than “ a Democrat hit job to stain Trump ’ s legacy and hurt him at the polls.
“ Rep. Mark Meadows ( R-NC ) also responded to the comments , specifically the line that “ Trump will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is “ all about trying to politically damage the President , ” Meadows said on Twitter .

4k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has declared that President Donald Trump will be removed from the White House by Democrats this year “one way or another.”
During an interview with ABC News, Pelosi claimed that Democrats may “have him removed sooner” than the November general election.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
“Let’s be optimistic about the future,” Speaker Pelosi stated. “A future that will not have Donald Trump in the White House, one way or another.“
“Ten months from now, we will have an election, if we don’t have him removed sooner. But again, he will be impeached forever,” Pelosi concluded.
Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA) seized on the remarks and posted a clip of the interview on Twitter.
Scalise denounced Pelosi’s comments and said they prove the impeachment push against the president is nothing more than “a Democrat hit job to stain Trump’s legacy and hurt him at the polls.“
Pelosi said today:
– Trump won't be president next year "one way or another"
– Dems may "have him removed sooner" than the election
– Trump "will be impeached forever"
It's clear: Impeachment was a Democrat hit job to stain Trump’s legacy and hurt him at the polls. Nothing more. pic.twitter.com/LY4TUwNiuZ — Steve Scalise (@SteveScalise) January 12, 2020
Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) also responded to the comments, specifically the line that “Trump will be an impeached President forever.”
Impeachment is “all about trying to politically damage the President,” Meadows said on Twitter.


newspunch--2020-01-17--Dem Official Refuses To Stand For Flag and Vows To Call Police If Pledge of Allegiance Recited

A North Carolina board of elections chairwoman refused to stand for the flag and threatened to call the police if anyone were to attempt to recite the Pledge of Allegiance at a board meeting in the future .
It has become increasingly clear in recent years that many on the left are not only uninterested in displaying respect to the country and the flag that represents it , they are openly hostile to any form of patriotism .
That was just proven Tuesday in a board of elections meeting in Bladen County , North Carolina , when three Democratic members @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to add the Pledge of Allegiance to the agenda .
The vote prompted an audience-member-led recitation — and the Democratic chairwoman threatened to call the police if anyone dared to “ disrupt ” proceedings by reciting the Pledge of Allegiance at the next meeting , according to the Washington Free Beacon .
The board of elections meeting for the county had been attended and filmed in its entirety by a local reporter for the Bladen Online media outlet .
WesternJournal report : The first order of business raised at the meeting was in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by board member Emory White , a military veteran .
Only White and the other Republican on the board , fellow veteran Michael Aycock , voted in favor of adding the Pledge to the agenda , while chairwoman Louella Thompson and fellow Democratic board members Deborah Belle and Patsy Sheppard voted against it .
A few moments after that vote , the floor was opened up for attendees to address the board with any questions , and several people spoke out in opposition to the decision to not recite the pledge prior to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is done with an opening invocation .
One person who spoke up in favor of the pledge actually proceeded to recite it , and he was joined by the vast majority of those in attendance , as well as the two Republican board members .
The three Democratic members remained seated .
Thompson called for a short recess following the recitation of the pledge and then later , after the board had reconvened , the meeting went on as usual .
However , at the tail end of the meeting , just before @ @ @ @ @ @ @ issue of the earlier “ disruption ” regarding the pledge .
“ The next meeting , if that happens again , law enforcement will be called because it is against the law to disrupt a meeting that is going on , and that is what happened today with the reciting of the pledge , ” she said .
According to the local Bladen Journal , Thompson had been appointed to her position as chair of the County Board of Elections by Democratic Gov .
Roy Cooper , and the governor ’ s office @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that meeting regarding the pledge .
As it turns out , the Democratic governor didn ’ t feel the same way as the chairwoman he appointed .
“ The Governor leads the Pledge of Allegiance before every Council of State meeting .
He doesn ’ t agree with the action taken and he thinks it ’ s a good practice to say it before a Board of Elections meeting , ” spokeswoman Sadie Weiner wrote in an email to the Bladen Journal .
While the governor ’ s support for the pledge is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ issue of the threat to call law enforcement for a future recitation at a meeting .
Republican North Carolina Rep. Dan Bishop , who represents part of the county , had no qualms about calling out that particular aspect of the incident .
“ I was appalled that the Chairwoman of the Bladen County Board of Elections will prevent board members — on threat of arrest — from reciting the Pledge of Allegiance , ” Bishop said in a statement .
“ It shows a twisted moral code to oppress the right to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from oppression .
I stand with the board members who continue to revere and respect our flag and those who lost their lives defending it.
” It is nothing short of amazing that some folks on the left have chosen to make something as fundamental as the pledge of allegiance into a divisive political issue .
The fact that Thompson would actually threaten to call the police over the recitation of the pledge — in essence , calling the government to complain about people pledging loyalty to the government — is downright baffling @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the issue inevitably arises again .

3k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
A North Carolina board of elections chairwoman refused to stand for the flag and threatened to call the police if anyone were to attempt to recite the Pledge of Allegiance at a board meeting in the future.
It has become increasingly clear in recent years that many on the left are not only uninterested in displaying respect to the country and the flag that represents it, they are openly hostile to any form of patriotism.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
That was just proven Tuesday in a board of elections meeting in Bladen County, North Carolina, when three Democratic members of the board voted down a proposal to add the Pledge of Allegiance to the agenda.
The vote prompted an audience-member-led recitation — and the Democratic chairwoman threatened to call the police if anyone dared to “disrupt” proceedings by reciting the Pledge of Allegiance at the next meeting, according to the Washington Free Beacon.
The board of elections meeting for the county had been attended and filmed in its entirety by a local reporter for the Bladen Online media outlet.
WesternJournal report: The first order of business raised at the meeting was in regard to the Pledge and was raised by board member Emory White, a military veteran. Only White and the other Republican on the board, fellow veteran Michael Aycock, voted in favor of adding the Pledge to the agenda, while chairwoman Louella Thompson and fellow Democratic board members Deborah Belle and Patsy Sheppard voted against it.
A few moments after that vote, the floor was opened up for attendees to address the board with any questions, and several people spoke out in opposition to the decision to not recite the pledge prior to the start of board meetings, as is done with an opening invocation.
One person who spoke up in favor of the pledge actually proceeded to recite it, and he was joined by the vast majority of those in attendance, as well as the two Republican board members. The three Democratic members remained seated.
Thompson called for a short recess following the recitation of the pledge and then later, after the board had reconvened, the meeting went on as usual.
However, at the tail end of the meeting, just before it was adjourned, Thompson raised the issue of the earlier “disruption” regarding the pledge.
“The next meeting, if that happens again, law enforcement will be called because it is against the law to disrupt a meeting that is going on, and that is what happened today with the reciting of the pledge,” she said.
“So be prepared for that.”
According to the local Bladen Journal, Thompson had been appointed to her position as chair of the County Board of Elections by Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper, and the governor’s office was asked about what had transpired at that meeting regarding the pledge. As it turns out, the Democratic governor didn’t feel the same way as the chairwoman he appointed.
“The Governor leads the Pledge of Allegiance before every Council of State meeting. He doesn’t agree with the action taken and he thinks it’s a good practice to say it before a Board of Elections meeting,” spokeswoman Sadie Weiner wrote in an email to the Bladen Journal.
While the governor’s support for the pledge is appreciated, he clearly avoided addressing the issue of the threat to call law enforcement for a future recitation at a meeting.
Republican North Carolina Rep. Dan Bishop, who represents part of the county, had no qualms about calling out that particular aspect of the incident.
“I was appalled that the Chairwoman of the Bladen County Board of Elections will prevent board members — on threat of arrest — from reciting the Pledge of Allegiance,” Bishop said in a statement.
“It shows a twisted moral code to oppress the right to honor a flag that stands for freedom from oppression. I stand with the board members who continue to revere and respect our flag and those who lost their lives defending it.”
It is nothing short of amazing that some folks on the left have chosen to make something as fundamental as the pledge of allegiance into a divisive political issue.
The fact that Thompson would actually threaten to call the police over the recitation of the pledge — in essence, calling the government to complain about people pledging loyalty to the government — is downright baffling and hopefully, she will reconsider when the issue inevitably arises again.


newspunch--2020-01-17--Brussels Chief Says Britain Will Rejoin The EU

Britain will eventually rejoin the EU once the younger generation realize the that country has made a terrible mistake , according to senior MEP Guy Verhofstadt .
The only question was how long it would take for the UK to align with the bloc again the European Parliament ’ s Brexit coordinator added .
MSN news reports : The comments – just a fortnight before Britain is due to leave and despite an election landslide for Boris Johnson – came as the two sides drew battle lines over citizen ’ s rights and future trade .
Mr Verhofstadt had a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ last night , with the Brexit Secretary accusing him of ‘ scaremongering ’ over the protections for EU citizens staying in the UK after January 31 .
A spokesman for Mr Barclay said : ‘ He reminded Mr Verhofstadt of the impact of scaremongering which feeds the anxiety of EU citizens we are seeking to reassure.
’ ‘ It ’ s obvious that we need a close relationship .
The distance between the continent on the one hand and Britain on the other hand will not increase .
In an interview on BBC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ morning , Mr Verhofstadt was asked about remarks by Labour MEP Seb Dance that Britain was only ‘ taking a sabbatical ’ from the EU and would rejoin .
Mr Verhofstadt said : ‘ I think that will happen .
It is difficult to say when .
‘ But there will be a generation , a young generation in the coming decades who will say ” what have we done ?
We want to go back.
” ‘ It will happen .
Maybe I will not see it in my life any more @ @ @ @ @ @ @

Britain will eventually rejoin the EU once the younger generation realize the that country has made a terrible mistake, according to senior MEP Guy Verhofstadt.
The only question was how long it would take for the UK to align with the bloc again the European Parliament’s Brexit coordinator added.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
MSN news reports: The comments – just a fortnight before Britain is due to leave and despite an election landslide for Boris Johnson – came as the two sides drew battle lines over citizen’s rights and future trade.
Mr Verhofstadt had a bruising meeting with Steve Barclay in Westminster last night, with the Brexit Secretary accusing him of ‘scaremongering’ over the protections for EU citizens staying in the UK after January 31.
A spokesman for Mr Barclay said: ‘He reminded Mr Verhofstadt of the impact of scaremongering which feeds the anxiety of EU citizens we are seeking to reassure.’
‘It’s obvious that we need a close relationship. The distance between the continent on the one hand and Britain on the other hand will not increase.
In an interview on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme this morning, Mr Verhofstadt was asked about remarks by Labour MEP Seb Dance that Britain was only ‘taking a sabbatical’ from the EU and would rejoin.
Mr Verhofstadt said: ‘I think that will happen. It is difficult to say when.
‘But there will be a generation, a young generation in the coming decades who will say ”what have we done? We want to go back.”
‘It will happen. Maybe I will not see it in my life any more, but it will happen.’


newspunch--2020-01-17--Mother & Grandparents Accused Of Locking Children In Wooden Cages

An Alabama mother , grandmother and grandfather have been arrested , accused of locking children in wooden cages .
Five children including an eight-month-old were removed from an Alabama home after police say their mother and grandparents had locked them in the “ cages ” which were made of cribs with crudely constructed lids .
The Independent reports : On Monday , investigators from Lee County Sheriff ’ s Office conducted a welfare check at a home in Smiths Station , roughly 15 miles from Columbus in eastern Alabama , following reports of a “ possible child abuse situation ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with four children aged three , four , 10 and 11 , and were made aware of an eight-month-old child who also lives at the residence but wasn ’ t at home .
The investigation revealed “ two wood-constructed cages that had hasps and locks present ” and where “ children had been locked in the cages on multiple occasions ” .
All five children are now in the care of Lee County Department of Human Resources .
Arrest warrants issued on Wednesday include multiple counts of child abuse and reckless endangerment of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 30 , was arrested and charged with two counts of aggravated abuse of a child less than six years of age as well as two counts of reckless endangerment .
She is being held on a $ 122,000 bond .
Pamela Deloris Bond , 66 , faces two counts of aggravated child abuse , two counts of reckless endangerment and one count of tampering with physical evidence .
She is being held on a $ 123,000 bond .
James Bond , 69 , has also been charged with two counts aggravated child abuse @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He is being held on a $ 122,000 bond .

An Alabama mother, grandmother and grandfather have been arrested, accused of locking children in wooden cages.
Five children including an eight-month-old were removed from an Alabama home after police say their mother and grandparents had locked them in the “cages” which were made of cribs with crudely constructed lids.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
The Independent reports: On Monday, investigators from Lee County Sheriff’s Office conducted a welfare check at a home in Smiths Station, roughly 15 miles from Columbus in eastern Alabama, following reports of a “possible child abuse situation” at the home.
Investigators made contact with four children aged three, four, 10 and 11, and were made aware of an eight-month-old child who also lives at the residence but wasn’t at home.
The investigation revealed “two wood-constructed cages that had hasps and locks present” and where “children had been locked in the cages on multiple occasions”.
All five children are now in the care of Lee County Department of Human Resources.
Arrest warrants issued on Wednesday include multiple counts of child abuse and reckless endangerment of a child.
Kylla Michelle Mann, 30, was arrested and charged with two counts of aggravated abuse of a child less than six years of age as well as two counts of reckless endangerment. She is being held on a $122,000 bond.
Pamela Deloris Bond, 66, faces two counts of aggravated child abuse, two counts of reckless endangerment and one count of tampering with physical evidence. She is being held on a $123,000 bond.
James Bond, 69, has also been charged with two counts aggravated child abuse and two counts of reckless endangerment. He is being held on a $122,000 bond.


newspunch--2020-01-18--Eminem Demands ‘Gun Control’; Urges Fans to Undermine Second Amendment

Trump-hating rapper Eminem is now promoting extreme gun control reform in his new song “ Darkness , ” taken from his 11th album , ‘ Music to Be Murdered By.
’ In the song , Eminem urges fans to register to vote for candidates who will undermine the Second Amendment .
The song tells the story of a loner going on a shooting spree , while another song , “ Unaccommodating , ” has spurred outcry over its reference to the 2017 deadly bombing at an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester , UK , which left 22 people dead .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ m contemplating yelling ‘ bombs away ’ on the game like I ’ m outside of an Ariana Grande concert waiting , ” the 47-year-old artist , born Marshall Mathers , raps on the track .
The lyric was met with scorn on social media , with some users dubbing it “ disgusting ” and “ trash.
” The new album , called “ Music to be Murdered by , ” features appearances from the late rapper Juice WRLD , along with Q-Tip , Ed Sheeran , Anderson .Paak and regular collaborator @ @ @ @ @ @ @ credited throughout as a producer .
Eminem released his last album “ Kamikaze ” in 2018 in a similar sudden fashion .
That album included several attacks on President Donald Trump .
The rapper also released Friday a video for “ Darkness ” that featured audio and footage from the 2017 mass shooting in Las Vegas , the deadliest US gun massacre carried about by an individual in modern history .
It ends urging viewers to register to vote : “ Make your voice heard and help change gun laws in America , @ @ @ @ @

1.1k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Trump-hating rapper Eminem is now promoting extreme gun control reform in his new song “Darkness,” taken from his 11th album, ‘Music to Be Murdered By.’
In the song, Eminem urges fans to register to vote for candidates who will undermine the Second Amendment.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
The song tells the story of a loner going on a shooting spree, while another song, “Unaccommodating,” has spurred outcry over its reference to the 2017 deadly bombing at an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester, UK, which left 22 people dead.
Yahoo News reports: “But I’m contemplating yelling ‘bombs away’ on the game like I’m outside of an Ariana Grande concert waiting,” the 47-year-old artist, born Marshall Mathers, raps on the track.
The lyric was met with scorn on social media, with some users dubbing it “disgusting” and “trash.”
The new album, called “Music to be Murdered by,” features appearances from the late rapper Juice WRLD, along with Q-Tip, Ed Sheeran, Anderson .Paak and regular collaborator singer Skylar Grey.
Dr. Dre is credited throughout as a producer.
Eminem released his last album “Kamikaze” in 2018 in a similar sudden fashion. That album included several attacks on President Donald Trump.
The rapper also released Friday a video for “Darkness” that featured audio and footage from the 2017 mass shooting in Las Vegas, the deadliest US gun massacre carried about by an individual in modern history.
It ends urging viewers to register to vote: “Make your voice heard and help change gun laws in America,” closing text reads.


newspunch--2020-01-18--POTUS: Virginia Proves Democrats Want to ‘Take Away Your Guns’

President Trump has warned that the gun control situation in Virginia proves that Democrats are hellbent on taking citizens ’ gun away if voted into office .
On January 17 , 2020 , Trump issued the warning amid the all-out war on guns by Gov .
Ralph Northam and the newly elected Democrat majority .
Breitbart.com reports : Virginia Democrats started this week intent on passing legislation allowing a total ban on the ownership of AR-15s and similar guns , but they dropped the confiscatory bill after thousands of NRA members flooded the hallways outside state Senate offices .
Yet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ assault weapons ” ban that would only allow AR-15 owners to keep their rifles if they agree to obtain a license from the state police .
Democrats are being open about their intention to use the licensing process to form a database listing information of AR-15 owners .
They are also pursuing a ban on “ high-capacity ” magazines , a ban on suppressors and certain aftermarket triggers , and other gun controls .
On January 15 , 2020 , Gov .
Northam declared a “ state of emergency ” and unilaterally banned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state Capitol grounds .

774 SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
President Trump has warned that the gun control situation in Virginia proves that Democrats are hellbent on taking citizens’ gun away if voted into office.
On January 17, 2020, Trump issued the warning amid the all-out war on guns by Gov. Ralph Northam and the newly elected Democrat majority.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1218297464941314049
Breitbart.com reports: Virginia Democrats started this week intent on passing legislation allowing a total ban on the ownership of AR-15s and similar guns, but they dropped the confiscatory bill after thousands of NRA members flooded the hallways outside state Senate offices.
Yet the Democrats are still pushing an “assault weapons” ban that would only allow AR-15 owners to keep their rifles if they agree to obtain a license from the state police. Democrats are being open about their intention to use the licensing process to form a database listing information of AR-15 owners.
They are also pursuing a ban on “high-capacity” magazines, a ban on suppressors and certain aftermarket triggers, and other gun controls.
https://www.instagram.com/tv/B7YeEeCpJpS/?utm_source=ig_embed
On January 15, 2020, Gov. Northam declared a “state of emergency” and unilaterally banned the exercise of Second Amendment rights on state Capitol grounds.


newspunch--2020-01-18--GAO Found Obama Admin Violated Federal Law Multiple Times

During former President Barack Obama ’ s time in office , the Government Accountability Office ( GAO ) found his administration violated federal law seven times .
None of these cases ever led to Obama ’ s impeachment .
Democrats and journalists were giddy with excitement Thursday when the GAO released a legal opinion that the White House Office of Management and Budget ( OMB ) had violated the Impoundment Control Act by withholding congressionally appropriated aid to Ukraine last summer .
Breitbart.com reports : The non-binding opinion was disputed by the OMB , which released a memo last month @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sought to fulfill , not oppose , congressional intent .
The GAO decision , which had been requested by Democrat Senator Chris van Hollen of Maryland , disagreed , concluding that the delay had been for “ policy reasons , ” not “ programmatic delay.
” Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi ( D-CA ) cited the decision in her morning press conference — though she had trouble pronouncing the word “ impoundment ” — and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer ( D-NY ) likewise trumpeted the GAO decision as a vindication of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ works for Congress , it is not the finder of fact in impeachment cases .
Moreover , it is not even clear that the Impoundment Control Act is constitution .
Nevertheless , if a mere GAO finding is sufficient to justify impeachment , then President Barack Obama ought to have been impeached at least seven times over for each of the following cases in which the GAO found that the Obama administration had violated federal law .
• The Department of Homeland Security ( DHS ) and United States Secret Service ( USSS @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 503 of the Consolidated Security , Disaster Assistance , and Continuing Appropriations Act , and the Antideficiency Act , in 2009 after the Secret Service reported that it had overspent on candidate protection in 2008 by $ 5,100,000 , and used money from another program to cover the shortfall .
DHS failed to notify Congress 15 days in advance of the “ reprogramming.
” • The Department of the Treasury was found to have violated the Antideficiency Act in 2014 when it used the voluntary services of four individuals .
“ Treasury did @ @ @ @ @ @ @ federal employment , nor did any individual qualify as a student who may , under certain circumstances , perform voluntary service , ” the GAO found , adding that there was no emergency that might have justified using the individuals to perform several months of work without receiving pay .
• The Department of Defense was found to have violated the Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 2014 and the Antideficiency Act in the infamous Bowe Bergdahl swap , when President Barack Obama traded five high-level Taliban detainees for a U.S. Army deserter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from Guantanamo Bay without notifying relevant congressional committees 30 days in advance , as required by law .
Republicans complained ; Democrats were silent .
• The Department of Housing and Urban Development was found to have violated the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act , the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act , and the Antideficiency Act in 2014 when the deputy secretary of the department sent an email to “ friends and colleagues ” asking them to lobby the Senate in favor of a bill appropriating money to the department @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Senators .
• The Environmental Protection Agency was found to have violated “ publicity or propaganda and anti-lobbying provisions ” in the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act and the Department of the Interior , Environment , and Related Agencies Appropriations Act in 2015 by using some of the department ’ s social media accounts in rule-making for the “ Waters of the United States ” ( WOTUS ) regulations ( which have since been repealed under the Trump administration ) .
• Two officials in the Department of Housing and Urban @ @ @ @ @ @ @ violated Section 713 of the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act by attempting to prevent a regional director within the agency from being interviewed by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform .
( Notably , the GAO reversed its earlier decision that the department ’ s general counsel had not violated the law once it was presented with more evidence . )
• The Federal Maritime Commission was found to have violated Section 711 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act , as well as the Antideficiency Act , in 2016 when it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ House committees that it had spent more than $ 5,000 to furnish and redecorate the office of its former director in 2010 .
( The total amount spent was $ 12,084 over three years , as noted by the GAO in a footnote reference to an inspector general ’ s report on the excessive expenditures . )
Needless to say , Obama was never impeached .

3.2k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
During former President Barack Obama’s time in office, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found his administration violated federal law seven times.
None of these cases ever led to Obama’s impeachment.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Democrats and journalists were giddy with excitement Thursday when the GAO released a legal opinion that the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) had violated the Impoundment Control Act by withholding congressionally appropriated aid to Ukraine last summer.
Breitbart.com reports: The non-binding opinion was disputed by the OMB, which released a memo last month arguing that the “programmatic” delay sought to fulfill, not oppose, congressional intent.
The GAO decision, which had been requested by Democrat Senator Chris van Hollen of Maryland, disagreed, concluding that the delay had been for “policy reasons,” not “programmatic delay.” Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) cited the decision in her morning press conference — though she had trouble pronouncing the word “impoundment” — and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) likewise trumpeted the GAO decision as a vindication of the House impeachment.
Though the GAO works for Congress, it is not the finder of fact in impeachment cases. Moreover, it is not even clear that the Impoundment Control Act is constitution.
Nevertheless, if a mere GAO finding is sufficient to justify impeachment, then President Barack Obama ought to have been impeached at least seven times over for each of the following cases in which the GAO found that the Obama administration had violated federal law.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and United States Secret Service (USSS) were found to have violated section 503 of the Consolidated Security, Disaster Assistance, and Continuing Appropriations Act, and the Antideficiency Act, in 2009 after the Secret Service reported that it had overspent on candidate protection in 2008 by $5,100,000, and used money from another program to cover the shortfall. DHS failed to notify Congress 15 days in advance of the “reprogramming.”
The Department of the Treasury was found to have violated the Antideficiency Act in 2014 when it used the voluntary services of four individuals. “Treasury did not appoint any of the individuals to federal employment, nor did any individual qualify as a student who may, under certain circumstances, perform voluntary service,” the GAO found, adding that there was no emergency that might have justified using the individuals to perform several months of work without receiving pay.
The Department of Defense was found to have violated the Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 2014 and the Antideficiency Act in the infamous Bowe Bergdahl swap, when President Barack Obama traded five high-level Taliban detainees for a U.S. Army deserter. The administration transferred the five Taliban from Guantanamo Bay without notifying relevant congressional committees 30 days in advance, as required by law. Republicans complained; Democrats were silent.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development was found to have violated the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act, the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, and the Antideficiency Act in 2014 when the deputy secretary of the department sent an email to “friends and colleagues” asking them to lobby the Senate in favor of a bill appropriating money to the department, and against amendments offered by Republican Senators.
The Environmental Protection Agency was found to have violated “publicity or propaganda and anti-lobbying provisions” in the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act and the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act in 2015 by using some of the department’s social media accounts in rule-making for the “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) regulations (which have since been repealed under the Trump administration).
Two officials in the Department of Housing and Urban Development were found in 2016 to have violated Section 713 of the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act by attempting to prevent a regional director within the agency from being interviewed by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. (Notably, the GAO reversed its earlier decision that the department’s general counsel had not violated the law once it was presented with more evidence.)
The Federal Maritime Commission was found to have violated Section 711 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, as well as the Antideficiency Act, in 2016 when it failed to notify the relevant Senate and House committees that it had spent more than $5,000 to furnish and redecorate the office of its former director in 2010. (The total amount spent was $12,084 over three years, as noted by the GAO in a footnote reference to an inspector general’s report on the excessive expenditures.)
Needless to say, Obama was never impeached.


newspunch--2020-01-18--ICE Director: De Blasio’s Sanctuary Policy ‘Sole Reason’ 92-Year-Old Maria Fuertes Is Dead

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio ’ s sanctuary policy is “ the sole reason ” 92-year-old Maria Fuertes is dead , ICE Director Matthew Albence says .
Reeaz Khan , an illegal alien from Guyana , was arrested last week and charged with sexually assaulting and brutally murdering Fuertes by strangling her to death on a sidewalk in Richmond Hill , Queens .
Breitbart.com reports : As Breitbart News exclusively reported , Khan first arrived in New York City on a B-2 tourist visa in May 2016 but never departed , overstaying his visa for three years .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Khan an illegal alien .
On November 27 , the New York Police Department ( NYPD ) charged Khan with assault and criminal possession of a weapon .
ICE agents filed a request that Khan be turned over to them for arrest should he be released from NYPD custody .
That request , though , was ignored and police freed him back into the general public .
During a press conference on Friday , Albence scolded de Blasio for his defense of the NYPD releasing Khan two months before Fuertes ’ alleged murder @ @ @ @ @ @ @ efforts and our warnings to the disastrous consequences of noncooperation and even outright interference have gone unheard resulting in tragedies such as this one — countless victims whose lives are forever scarred at the hands of illegal criminal aliens .
[ Emphasis added ] As long as politicians continue to put their own self-interest over those they ’ ve sworn to protect , and frankly , those who actually put them in office , this tragic situation will be repeated again and again .
Make no mistake , it is this city ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reason that this criminal was allowed to roam the streets freely and end an innocent woman ’ s life .
[ Emphasis added ] So here I am again , pleading to the people of New York City and to the people of other sanctuary cities , let ICE help you .
Let us help you keep your communities safe .
We can actually prevent crimes such as these brutal sexual offenses and murders like we saw here this past week .
These [ sanctuary ] policies plain and simple … make all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the opposite of the primary goal of every law enforcement officer and law enforcement agency and every elected official should be .
[ Emphasis added ] If NYPD officers had called ICE to take custody of Khan in November , Albence said “ Maria Fuertes could be alive today.
” Khan was indicted this week by a grand jury on 7-counts , including second-degree murder , first-degree manslaughter , first-degree attempted rape , first-degree sexual abuse , and tampering with physical evidence .
In the indictment , Queens District Attorney Melinda Katz described @ @ @ @ @ @ @ began when Khan charged at the elderly woman from behind and knocked her to the ground .
Khan then allegedly attacked her from behind , knocked the 92-year-old onto the sidewalk .
The defendant is alleged to have sexually assaulted her , according to the autopsy performed by the medical examiner .
Ms. Fuertes was found by a passerby at approximately 2:14 a.m. , who called 911 .
The victim , who was barely conscious and incoherent … sustained a fractured spine in 2 places , 2 rib fractures , bruising to her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ died as a result of the injuries .
De Blasio defended Khan ’ s prior release by NYPD , saying that criminal illegal aliens will only ever be turned over to ICE if they are convicted of victimizing Americans and that violent crime charges do not meet that threshold .
More than 7,500 criminal illegal aliens were released in the sanctuary state of New York in 2019 — including convicted murderers , convicted sex offenders , and convicted assailants .

1.4k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio’s sanctuary policy is “the sole reason” 92-year-old Maria Fuertes is dead, ICE Director Matthew Albence says.
Reeaz Khan, an illegal alien from Guyana, was arrested last week and charged with sexually assaulting and brutally murdering Fuertes by strangling her to death on a sidewalk in Richmond Hill, Queens.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Breitbart.com reports:As Breitbart News exclusively reported, Khan first arrived in New York City on a B-2 tourist visa in May 2016 but never departed, overstaying his visa for three years. That violation of federal immigration law makes Khan an illegal alien.
On November 27, the New York Police Department (NYPD) charged Khan with assault and criminal possession of a weapon. ICE agents filed a request that Khan be turned over to them for arrest should he be released from NYPD custody. That request, though, was ignored and police freed him back into the general public.
During a press conference on Friday, Albence scolded de Blasio for his defense of the NYPD releasing Khan two months before Fuertes’ alleged murder:
Time and time again, our efforts and our warnings to the disastrous consequences of noncooperation and even outright interference have gone unheard resulting in tragedies such as this one — countless victims whose lives are forever scarred at the hands of illegal criminal aliens. [Emphasis added] As long as politicians continue to put their own self-interest over those they’ve sworn to protect, and frankly, those who actually put them in office, this tragic situation will be repeated again and again. Make no mistake, it is this city’s sanctuary policies that are the sole reason that this criminal was allowed to roam the streets freely and end an innocent woman’s life. [Emphasis added] So here I am again, pleading to the people of New York City and to the people of other sanctuary cities, let ICE help you. Let us help you keep your communities safe. We can actually prevent crimes such as these brutal sexual offenses and murders like we saw here this past week. These [sanctuary] policies plain and simple … make all of us less safe, which is the opposite of the primary goal of every law enforcement officer and law enforcement agency and every elected official should be. [Emphasis added]
If NYPD officers had called ICE to take custody of Khan in November, Albence said “Maria Fuertes could be alive today.”
Khan was indicted this week by a grand jury on 7-counts, including second-degree murder, first-degree manslaughter, first-degree attempted rape, first-degree sexual abuse, and tampering with physical evidence.
In the indictment, Queens District Attorney Melinda Katz described the brutal attack on Fuertes which allegedly began when Khan charged at the elderly woman from behind and knocked her to the ground.
The indictment reads:
Khan then allegedly attacked her from behind, knocked the 92-year-old onto the sidewalk. The defendant is alleged to have sexually assaulted her, according to the autopsy performed by the medical examiner. Ms. Fuertes was found by a passerby at approximately 2:14 a.m., who called 911. The victim, who was barely conscious and incoherent … sustained a fractured spine in 2 places, 2 rib fractures, bruising to her neck and chest and other injuries and died as a result of the injuries.
De Blasio defended Khan’s prior release by NYPD, saying that criminal illegal aliens will only ever be turned over to ICE if they are convicted of victimizing Americans and that violent crime charges do not meet that threshold.
More than 7,500 criminal illegal aliens were released in the sanctuary state of New York in 2019 — including convicted murderers, convicted sex offenders, and convicted assailants.


newspunch--2020-01-19--Trump Cancels Michelle Obama’s School Lunch Program On Her Birthday – Democrats OUTRAGED

The Trump administration has announced it is scrapping Michelle Obama ’ s school lunch program because it creates “ excess waste ” and lacks “ common sense.
” The Department of Agriculture ( USDA ) revealed it is dumping the plan on Friday — which happened to be Michelle Obama ’ s 56th birthday — sending Obama-worshipping Democrats into a predictable meltdown .
The USDA said in a statement that the rule change will allow schools increased flexibility regarding which fruits and vegetables they can offer students .
“ Schools and school districts continue to tell us that there is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more common-sense flexibility is needed to provide students nutritious and appetizing meals , ” said Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue .
“ We listened and now we ’ re getting to work.
” The announcement follows the 2017 decision by the Agriculture Department to roll back nutrition standards for federally subsidized school meals due to excess food waste .
In 2012 , the Obama administration toughened standards on nutrition that schools had been required to follow .
By adhering to the plan , schools would receive federal reimbursement for free and reduced-price meals for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ restores local control of guidelines on whole grains , sodium , and milk in the National School Lunch Program .
It does not spell out changes with fruits , vegetables , and protein .
“ This announcement is the result of years of feedback from students , schools and food service experts about the challenges they are facing in meeting the final regulations for school meals , ” Perdue said in a release at the time .
The USDA said that the new proposals would give “ school nutrition professionals … more flexibility @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appeal to their students ’ preferences and subsequently reduce food waste .
“ The proposed rule also encourages state and local operators to focus resources on feeding children rather than administrative paperwork , ” Perdue said .
“ Our proposed changes empower schools to give their very best to our children nationwide and have the potential to benefit nearly 100,000 schools and institutions that feed 30 million children each school day through USDA ’ s school meal programs .
“ Providing children with wholesome , nutritious food is part of our motto at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right and feed everyone.
’ ” The USDA said that the first proposed rule aimed to ensure that kids still receive quality nutrition while at the same time giving flexibility to local school districts to serve kids food that they actually are willing to eat in an effort to reduce waste .
The USDA said they planned to accomplish this by : • Allowing local schools to offer more vegetable varieties , while keeping plenty of veggies in each meal ; • Making it easier for schools to offer school lunch entrees for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ food waste ; • Providing schools options to customize meal patterns to best serve children in different grades or smaller schools who eat together ; • Supporting a more customized school breakfast environment by letting schools adjust fruit servings and making it simpler to offer meats/meat alternates , ultimately encouraging breakfast options outside the cafeteria so students can start their day with a healthy breakfast ; and • Shifting to a performance-focused administrative review process that is less burdensome and time consuming , which would increase collaboration with operators to improve program integrity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democrats on Capitol Hill believed that the Trump administration intentionally rolled this out on Michelle Obama ’ s birthday , even though a USDA spokesperson said that was not the case .
Democrat Rep. Ayanna Pressley ( MA ) fumed over the announcement , writing on Twitter : “ Egregious .
The Occupant is trying to play petty with the food our babies eat .
“ Add it to the list affirming that the cruelty is the point with this White House.
” Democrat Rep. Ilhan Omar ( MN ) fired back , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all the food that children eat : “ Counter proposal : make *healthy* school meals universal year-round .
“ The # UniversalSchoolMealsProgramAct will guarantee breakfast , lunch , and dinner for every student in America .
”

5.8k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
The Trump administration has announced it is scrapping Michelle Obama’s school lunch program because it creates “excess waste” and lacks “common sense.”
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) revealed it is dumping the plan on Friday — which happened to be Michelle Obama’s 56th birthday — sending Obama-worshipping Democrats into a predictable meltdown.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
The USDA said in a statement that the rule change will allow schools increased flexibility regarding which fruits and vegetables they can offer students.
“Schools and school districts continue to tell us that there is still too much food waste and that more common-sense flexibility is needed to provide students nutritious and appetizing meals,” said Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue.
“We listened and now we’re getting to work.”
The announcement follows the 2017 decision by the Agriculture Department to roll back nutrition standards for federally subsidized school meals due to excess food waste.
In 2012, the Obama administration toughened standards on nutrition that schools had been required to follow.
By adhering to the plan, schools would receive federal reimbursement for free and reduced-price meals for low-income students.
Perdue’s announcement restores local control of guidelines on whole grains, sodium, and milk in the National School Lunch Program.
It does not spell out changes with fruits, vegetables, and protein.
“This announcement is the result of years of feedback from students, schools and food service experts about the challenges they are facing in meeting the final regulations for school meals,” Perdue said in a release at the time.
The USDA said that the new proposals would give “school nutrition professionals … more flexibility to serve appetizing and healthy meals that appeal to their students’ preferences and subsequently reduce food waste.
“The proposed rule also encourages state and local operators to focus resources on feeding children rather than administrative paperwork,” Perdue said.
“Our proposed changes empower schools to give their very best to our children nationwide and have the potential to benefit nearly 100,000 schools and institutions that feed 30 million children each school day through USDA’s school meal programs.
“Providing children with wholesome, nutritious food is part of our motto at USDA, which is to ‘do right and feed everyone.’”
The USDA said that the first proposed rule aimed to ensure that kids still receive quality nutrition while at the same time giving flexibility to local school districts to serve kids food that they actually are willing to eat in an effort to reduce waste.
The USDA said they planned to accomplish this by:
Allowing local schools to offer more vegetable varieties, while keeping plenty of veggies in each meal;
Making it easier for schools to offer school lunch entrees for a la carte purchase, thereby reducing food waste;
Providing schools options to customize meal patterns to best serve children in different grades or smaller schools who eat together;
Supporting a more customized school breakfast environment by letting schools adjust fruit servings and making it simpler to offer meats/meat alternates, ultimately encouraging breakfast options outside the cafeteria so students can start their day with a healthy breakfast; and
Shifting to a performance-focused administrative review process that is less burdensome and time consuming, which would increase collaboration with operators to improve program integrity.
The New York Times reported that Democrats on Capitol Hill believed that the Trump administration intentionally rolled this out on Michelle Obama’s birthday, even though a USDA spokesperson said that was not the case.
“Democrats reacted furiously,” the NYT stated.
Democrat Rep. Ayanna Pressley (MA) fumed over the announcement, writing on Twitter: “Egregious. The Occupant is trying to play petty with the food our babies eat.
“Add it to the list affirming that the cruelty is the point with this White House.”
Democrat Rep. Ilhan Omar (MN) fired back, suggesting that the federal government should provide all the food that children eat: “Counter proposal: make *healthy* school meals universal year-round.
“The #UniversalSchoolMealsProgramAct will guarantee breakfast, lunch, and dinner for every student in America.”


newspunch--2020-01-19--British Police Ignored Muslim Grooming Gangs Due to Fears Over ‘Racial Tensions’

British police failed to stop hundreds of young girls being sexually abused by a network of Muslim men despite knowing it was happening due to fears over creating “ racial tensions.
” A woman whose sexual exploitation as a child was ignored by police over fears of increasing racial tensions in Rotherham has said the force ‘ aided and abetted ’ the abuse of hundreds of children .
The Independent Office for Police Conduct ( IOPC ) upheld six complaints against South Yorkshire Police by a woman abused as a child for several years , starting in 2003 .
DailyMail @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seen by PA and first reported by The Times , the watchdog said it was ‘ very clear that you were sexually exploited by Asian men ’ and found police were aware of suspects but ‘ took insufficient action to prevent you from harm ’ .
The woman , who received the 13-page report on Wednesday after first making the complaints in 2014 , said children were ‘ sacrificed ’ by the failings of the police .
She told the PA news agency : ‘ I always thought that maybe the police didn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I got the report , and now I fully understand that they knew exactly what was going on .
‘ How could they do this to hundreds and hundreds of children ?
How could they go home at night after doing a shift and go to sleep ?
‘ We were never seen as children abused , they didn ’ t care at all.
’ She told PA her abuse began in her early teens when she was befriended by a woman , known to the police as being involved in child sexual @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Asian men to be groomed .
The woman ’ s mother complained that South Yorkshire Police ‘ would not listen and left you in dangerous situations , letting people do what they wanted and they never questioned anybody about what was happening , ’ the report said .
The IOPC upheld the complaint that the force was aware of suspects involved in her exploitation and failed to act , leaving her with people who were grooming the teenager .
The woman called for action to be taken against South Yorkshire Police , including @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ve always been complicit in what happened , we ’ ve seen perpetrators get done , so why are they any different ?
They ’ ve aided and abetted abuse , ’ she said .
In a second investigation included in the report , the woman ’ s father said an officer referred to grooming as ‘ P*** shagging ’ when he phoned the police to discuss his concerns about his daughter .
The officer , who was unable to be identified , was also found to have said ‘ with it being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for this to be coming out ’ and commented that the abuse had happened for 30 years .
The woman told PA she was very upset when reading the report and said : ‘ It doesn ’ t matter what colour a perp ( perpetrator ) is , they should all be treated the same.
’ The investigation also found the force tried to recruit the woman as an informant while she was underage , and did not act appropriately when she was taken from emergency accommodation to Bristol , around 150 miles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
South Yorkshire Police said it accepted the IOPC ’ s findings and ‘ recognises the failings of its past ’ , adding that the unnamed chief inspector ’ s alleged comments were not tolerated .
However , the woman said she did not think South Yorkshire Police ’ s response had gone far enough , and said : ‘ The only reason they ’ re sorry is because they ’ re sorry for getting caught.
’ She added : ‘ I want an apology to all the public in Rotherham because they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the victims and survivors and their families , they ’ ve done a disservice to all the communities as well.
’ A force spokesman said : ‘ It is unfortunate no individual officer has been identified by the IOPC as this is not something we tolerate in today ’ s force .
‘ The themes within this report have been understood by South Yorkshire Police for some time , and the identified learning has already been embedded within our organisation .
‘ We are not deterred from pursuing justice due to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ demonstrated in the many convictions we have secured in relation to CSE in recent years.
’ The IOPC Operation Linden was launched in 2014 with the watchdog conducting 91 independent investigations into the allegations that senior officers failed in their statutory duty to protect children between 1999 and 2011 .
PA understands that the full IOPC report into child sexual abuse in Rotherham could be published this year .

1.3k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
British police failed to stop hundreds of young girls being sexually abused by a network of Muslim men despite knowing it was happening due to fears over creating “racial tensions.”
A woman whose sexual exploitation as a child was ignored by police over fears of increasing racial tensions in Rotherham has said the force ‘aided and abetted’ the abuse of hundreds of children.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) upheld six complaints against South Yorkshire Police by a woman abused as a child for several years, starting in 2003.
DailyMail reports: According to a leaked report seen by PA and first reported by The Times, the watchdog said it was ‘very clear that you were sexually exploited by Asian men’ and found police were aware of suspects but ‘took insufficient action to prevent you from harm’.
The woman, who received the 13-page report on Wednesday after first making the complaints in 2014, said children were ‘sacrificed’ by the failings of the police.
She told the PA news agency: ‘I always thought that maybe the police didn’t understand what was happening until I got the report, and now I fully understand that they knew exactly what was going on.
‘How could they do this to hundreds and hundreds of children? How could they go home at night after doing a shift and go to sleep?
‘We were never seen as children abused, they didn’t care at all.’
She told PA her abuse began in her early teens when she was befriended by a woman, known to the police as being involved in child sexual exploitation, who introduced her to older Asian men to be groomed.
The woman’s mother complained that South Yorkshire Police ‘would not listen and left you in dangerous situations, letting people do what they wanted and they never questioned anybody about what was happening,’ the report said.
The IOPC upheld the complaint that the force was aware of suspects involved in her exploitation and failed to act, leaving her with people who were grooming the teenager.
The woman called for action to be taken against South Yorkshire Police, including potential criminal charges.
‘They’ve always been complicit in what happened, we’ve seen perpetrators get done, so why are they any different? They’ve aided and abetted abuse,’ she said.
In a second investigation included in the report, the woman’s father said an officer referred to grooming as ‘P*** shagging’ when he phoned the police to discuss his concerns about his daughter.
The officer, who was unable to be identified, was also found to have said ‘with it being Asians, we can’t afford for this to be coming out’ and commented that the abuse had happened for 30 years.
The woman told PA she was very upset when reading the report and said: ‘It doesn’t matter what colour a perp (perpetrator) is, they should all be treated the same.’
The investigation also found the force tried to recruit the woman as an informant while she was underage, and did not act appropriately when she was taken from emergency accommodation to Bristol, around 150 miles away, in order to be groomed.
South Yorkshire Police said it accepted the IOPC’s findings and ‘recognises the failings of its past’, adding that the unnamed chief inspector’s alleged comments were not tolerated.
However, the woman said she did not think South Yorkshire Police’s response had gone far enough, and said: ‘The only reason they’re sorry is because they’re sorry for getting caught.’
She added: ‘I want an apology to all the public in Rotherham because they’ve not only done a disservice to the victims and survivors and their families, they’ve done a disservice to all the communities as well.’
A force spokesman said: ‘It is unfortunate no individual officer has been identified by the IOPC as this is not something we tolerate in today’s force.
‘The themes within this report have been understood by South Yorkshire Police for some time, and the identified learning has already been embedded within our organisation.
‘We are not deterred from pursuing justice due to the characteristics of the offender. This is demonstrated in the many convictions we have secured in relation to CSE in recent years.’
The IOPC Operation Linden was launched in 2014 with the watchdog conducting 91 independent investigations into the allegations that senior officers failed in their statutory duty to protect children between 1999 and 2011.
PA understands that the full IOPC report into child sexual abuse in Rotherham could be published this year.


newspunch--2020-01-19--Nasty Nancy Orders Democrats To ‘Throw A Punch, For The Children’

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Democrats need to employ “ cold-blooded ” tactics , including throwing punches , to win the 2020 election for the sake of the country ’ s children , during a shambolic interview with Bill Maher on Friday .
Referring to Pelosi as the “ Iron Lady , ” Maher asked her for her thoughts on the current state of the Democratic Party .
“ I feel like the Democratic Party is very often the victim of their own purity tests , ” Maher said .
“ I don ’ t worry about that , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be ready to take a punch .
And you have to be ready to throw a punch , for the children.
” Pelosi , 79 , said the Democratic Party needs to use “ disciplined , focused , cold-blooded ” tactics to win in 2020 .
Maher ended the interview by saying , “ Good to have your cold-blooded self on our side.
“ Washington Examiner reports : Earlier in the interview , Maher , 63 , insisted the Left must refrain from hating the president ’ s supporters , even if they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can hate Trump .
You can ’ t hate the people who like him , ” Maher said , warning , “ That way lies , literally , civil war.
” Pelosi agreed with Maher ’ s sentiment , adding that she respects constituents with whom she disagrees .
Pelosi also mentioned Trump ’ s impeachment , saying , “ And you ’ re impeached forever !
No matter what the Senate does , it can never be erased.
” Pelosi said Trump gave the Democrats no choice but to impeach him , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ almost every single day .
”

2.1k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Democrats need to employ “cold-blooded” tactics, including throwing punches, to win the 2020 election for the sake of the country’s children, during a shambolic interview with Bill Maher on Friday.
Referring to Pelosi as the “Iron Lady,” Maher asked her for her thoughts on the current state of the Democratic Party. “I feel like the Democratic Party is very often the victim of their own purity tests,” Maher said.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
“I don’t worry about that,” Pelosi stammered. “You have to be ready to take a punch. And you have to be ready to throw a punch, for the children.”
Pelosi, 79, said the Democratic Party needs to use “disciplined, focused, cold-blooded” tactics to win in 2020. Maher ended the interview by saying, “Good to have your cold-blooded self on our side.“
Washington Examiner reports: Earlier in the interview, Maher, 63, insisted the Left must refrain from hating the president’s supporters, even if they hate the president himself.
“You can hate Trump. You can’t hate the people who like him,” Maher said, warning, “That way lies, literally, civil war.”
Pelosi agreed with Maher’s sentiment, adding that she respects constituents with whom she disagrees.
Pelosi also mentioned Trump’s impeachment, saying, “And you’re impeached forever! No matter what the Senate does, it can never be erased.”
Pelosi said Trump gave the Democrats no choice but to impeach him, claiming, “The president was self-impeaching almost every single day.”


newspunch--2020-01-19--Judge Slams Transgender Pronouns, Says They Are A ‘Courtesy’, NOT Law

Judge Stuart Kyle Duncan , a President Trump appointee , stated this week that courts are under no legal obligation to refer to transgender individuals by their chosen pronouns .
Judge Duncan said there is “ nothing to prohibit courts from referring to litigants according to their biological sex , rather than according to their subjective gender identity.
“ Duncan went on to refer to Kathrine Nicole Jett , a transgender woman who was known as Norman Varner in previous court hearings , as “ gender dysphoric.
” The defendant had asked to change her former name Norman Varner to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ previous conviction records as well as change the use of female pronouns .
Judge Duncan refused .
“ No authority supports the proposition that we may require litigants , judges , court personnel , or anyone else to refer to gender-dysphoric litigants with pronouns matching their subjective gender identity , ” Duncan wrote in his opinion .
“ But the courts that have followed this ‘ convention , ’ have done so purely as a courtesy to parties.
” TheHill reports : Duncan also notes in his ruling that while Congress has legislated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” it “ has said nothing to prohibit courts from referring to litigants according to their biological sex , rather than according to their subjective gender identity.
“ Duncan previously faced pushback from a number of civil rights groups for his views on LGBTQ rights from during his 2018 confirmation to the 5th U.S .
Circuit Court of Appeals .
The groups argued he had a personal agenda to set back LGBTQ rights .
Duncan previously served as the appellate counsel for North Carolina officials arguing in favor of a state law banning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their choice .
“ As the majority notes , though no law compels granting or denying such a request , many courts and judges adhere to such requests out of respect for the litigant ’ s dignity , ” Judge James L. Dennis wrote in a dissent to Duncan ’ s opinion , according to NBC News .
Dennis was appointed by former President Clinton .

1.2k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Judge Stuart Kyle Duncan, a President Trump appointee, stated this week that courts are under no legal obligation to refer to transgender individuals by their chosen pronouns.
Judge Duncan said there is “nothing to prohibit courts from referring to litigants according to their biological sex, rather than according to their subjective gender identity.“
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Duncan went on to refer to Kathrine Nicole Jett, a transgender woman who was known as Norman Varner in previous court hearings, as “gender dysphoric.”
The defendant had asked to change her former name Norman Varner to her new name Kathrine Nicole Jett on previous conviction records as well as change the use of female pronouns. Judge Duncan refused.
“No authority supports the proposition that we may require litigants, judges, court personnel, or anyone else to refer to gender-dysphoric litigants with pronouns matching their subjective gender identity,” Duncan wrote in his opinion.
“But the courts that have followed this ‘convention,’ have done so purely as a courtesy to parties.”
TheHill reports: Duncan also notes in his ruling that while Congress has legislated in specific “gender identity discrimination,” it “has said nothing to prohibit courts from referring to litigants according to their biological sex, rather than according to their subjective gender identity.“
Duncan previously faced pushback from a number of civil rights groups for his views on LGBTQ rights from during his 2018 confirmation to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The groups argued he had a personal agenda to set back LGBTQ rights. Duncan previously served as the appellate counsel for North Carolina officials arguing in favor of a state law banning transgender people from using the bathroom of their choice.
“As the majority notes, though no law compels granting or denying such a request, many courts and judges adhere to such requests out of respect for the litigant’s dignity,” Judge James L. Dennis wrote in a dissent to Duncan’s opinion, according to NBC News. Dennis was appointed by former President Clinton.


newspunch--2020-01-19--Nasty Nancy On Impeachment Witnesses: ‘It’s Not A Question Of Proof’ It’s About ‘Allegations’

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters that “ proof ” doesn ’ t matter in the impeachment trial of President Trump .
According to Pelosi , the “ allegations ” are what count .
“ It ’ s not a question of saying what proof .
It says what allegations have been made , ” Pelosi said to a media pack of obedient reporters who , despite their subservience to the Democrat Party , could hardly believe their ears .
After making a spectacle of herself and her caucus by signing and then delivering the articles of impeachment to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tow , the San Francisco Democrat stammered her way through an awkward news conference in which she admitted that she was not interested in proof .
“ You said that the Attorney General is implicated in this .
What evidence do you have ?
” a reporter asked her on Thursday of the insinuation that Attorney General William Barr is involved in some type of conspiracy with Ukraine .
“ Excuse me .
I told you I wasn ’ t answering .
You had a question yesterday .
When I said the attorney @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , this testimony implicated the rogue attorney general who has been the puppet of the – I don ’ t know who ’ s the puppet , Trump or the attorney general , but this is not – he says ‘ This is my attorney general .
This is my Department of Justice.
’ Really ?
” she said .
“ So , in any case , it ’ s not a question of saying what proof .
It says what allegations have been made and that has to be subjected to scrutiny @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but it should not be ignored , and the context of other events that have happened that would substantiate some of that , ” she said .
We can safely eliminate the first part of her slurred word-cocktail of a statement and focus on the second half .
Pelosi is essentially admitting that proof does not matter in the case against Trump — only the allegations .
Why is that ?
Mainly because if the Democrats can make enough salacious allegations , they could use those as soundbites in campaign ads for whoever @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and her caucus know that there is no way the president is going to be removed from office .
It ’ s not about that .
It is about the 2020 election and damaging Trump .
This is a play that Democrats have been running for time immemorial .
Remember all the Russian collusion accusations that amounted to a big heaping pile of nothing ?
There is a good portion of America that still believes that the president colluded with Russia because the media did not shout the fact that Special Counsel Robert @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as loudly as they shouted that he could have .
And then there were the never-even-close-to-proven sexual assault allegations that were made against Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh .
But it goes back even further than that , and even further than the Trump administration .
Let ’ s hop into our time machine and revisit the Democrats making the same play against the late former President Ronald Reagan .
The New York Times reported on August 6 , 1991 , that the Democrats wanted to open an investigation into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decade earlier based on nothing more than rumors and speculation .
“ Congressional Democratic leaders today ordered a formal investigation into whether Ronald Reagan ’ s Presidential campaign made a deal with Iran in 1980 to delay the release of American hostages until after the election , ” The Times reported .
“ These allegations are both persistent and disturbing , ” then-Speaker Thomas Foley and Senate Democratic Leader George J. Mitchell said at the time .
“ We have no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing , but the seriousness of the allegations , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ compel an effort to establish the facts , ” they said .
Once again , they had no proof but the “ seriousness of the allegations ” were enough for them to believe an investigation was warranted .
“ I am in a sense reluctant , ” Foley said , “ but I was convinced that these persistent rumors which have gone for so long and have occupied the attention of news media both here and abroad indicate that the inquiry should be taken.
” Imagine if that applied to every case .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ because you took their parking space could say that you murdered someone , and an investigation would be launched against you that could ruin your life even though there was no proof to support it .
Or what if there were “ persistent rumors ” about the occupants of a creepy house on your block ?
Should an investigation be launched into them based on rumors ?
It is the antithesis of what the American justice system is founded on .
The idea that the accused is innocent until proven guilty .
And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ case against someone , they must present evidence to a grand jury that convinces them that a case should be opened .
But what Democrats do is make allegations in the court of public opinion , convince people that they are true , and then when the truth is finally revealed it doesn ’ t matter because the lie has already been believed .
They have done it before , they are doing it now and they will continue to do it in the future unless Republicans finally take a stand .
That @ @ @ @

3.6k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters that “proof” doesn’t matter in the impeachment trial of President Trump. According to Pelosi, the “allegations” are what count.
“It’s not a question of saying what proof. It says what allegations have been made,” Pelosi said to a media pack of obedient reporters who, despite their subservience to the Democrat Party, could hardly believe their ears.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
After making a spectacle of herself and her caucus by signing and then delivering the articles of impeachment to the Senate with the obedient mainstream media in tow, the San Francisco Democrat stammered her way through an awkward news conference in which she admitted that she was not interested in proof.
“You said that the Attorney General is implicated in this. What evidence do you have?” a reporter asked her on Thursday of the insinuation that Attorney General William Barr is involved in some type of conspiracy with Ukraine.
“Excuse me. I told you I wasn’t answering. You had a question yesterday. When I said the attorney general was implicated, as I said, this testimony implicated the rogue attorney general who has been the puppet of the – I don’t know who’s the puppet, Trump or the attorney general, but this is not – he says ‘This is my attorney general. This is my Department of Justice.’ Really?” she said.
“So, in any case, it’s not a question of saying what proof. It says what allegations have been made and that has to be subjected to scrutiny as to how we go forward, but it should not be ignored, and the context of other events that have happened that would substantiate some of that,” she said.
We can safely eliminate the first part of her slurred word-cocktail of a statement and focus on the second half. Pelosi is essentially admitting that proof does not matter in the case against Trump — only the allegations.
WesternJournal report:
Why is that? Mainly because if the Democrats can make enough salacious allegations, they could use those as soundbites in campaign ads for whoever wins the Democratic presidential nomination.
Pelosi and her caucus know that there is no way the president is going to be removed from office. It’s not about that. It is about the 2020 election and damaging Trump.
This is a play that Democrats have been running for time immemorial. Remember all the Russian collusion accusations that amounted to a big heaping pile of nothing?
There is a good portion of America that still believes that the president colluded with Russia because the media did not shout the fact that Special Counsel Robert Mueller proved that he didn’t as loudly as they shouted that he could have.
And then there were the never-even-close-to-proven sexual assault allegations that were made against Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh.
But it goes back even further than that, and even further than the Trump administration.
Let’s hop into our time machine and revisit the Democrats making the same play against the late former President Ronald Reagan.
The New York Times reported on August 6, 1991, that the Democrats wanted to open an investigation into Reagan’s election more than a decade earlier based on nothing more than rumors and speculation.
“Congressional Democratic leaders today ordered a formal investigation into whether Ronald Reagan’s Presidential campaign made a deal with Iran in 1980 to delay the release of American hostages until after the election,” The Times reported.
“These allegations are both persistent and disturbing,” then-Speaker Thomas Foley and Senate Democratic Leader George J. Mitchell said at the time.
“We have no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing, but the seriousness of the allegations, and the weight of circumstantial information, compel an effort to establish the facts,” they said.
Once again, they had no proof but the “seriousness of the allegations” were enough for them to believe an investigation was warranted.
“I am in a sense reluctant,” Foley said, “but I was convinced that these persistent rumors which have gone for so long and have occupied the attention of news media both here and abroad indicate that the inquiry should be taken.”
Imagine if that applied to every case. A neighbor who does not like you because you took their parking space could say that you murdered someone, and an investigation would be launched against you that could ruin your life even though there was no proof to support it.
Or what if there were “persistent rumors” about the occupants of a creepy house on your block? Should an investigation be launched into them based on rumors?
It is the antithesis of what the American justice system is founded on. The idea that the accused is innocent until proven guilty.
And if a prosecutor wants to make a case against someone, they must present evidence to a grand jury that convinces them that a case should be opened.
But what Democrats do is make allegations in the court of public opinion, convince people that they are true, and then when the truth is finally revealed it doesn’t matter because the lie has already been believed.
They have done it before, they are doing it now and they will continue to do it in the future unless Republicans finally take a stand.
That time is now.


newspunch--2020-01-20--Dershowitz: I Have ‘Secret’ Epstein Emails That Will Put ‘Prominent People in Handcuffs’

Alan Dershowitz has “ secret ” emails from Jeffrey Epstein that implicate VIP pedophiles , including household names , and will put “ prominent people in handcuffs ” when they are released .
“ I can prove it , and I will prove it , ” vowed Dershowitz in an interview Thursday morning with ‘ Good Day New York.
’ During the interview , Dershowitz pushed back against allegations that he had sex with underage girls through billionaire convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein .
According to Dershowitz , who recently joined President Trump ’ s impeachment defense team , he is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will put “ prominent people in handcuffs.
” “ There are emails so far that are secret , but that prove , not only that I was framed , but who framed me , ” Dershowitz said .
“ It names names .
These people are going to go to jail once these e-mails come out because this was a total frame up for financial reasons , and I can prove it , and will prove it .
Have me back on the show when the e-mails come out , boy it will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prominent people in handcuffs .
Prominent people in handcuffs once these e-mails come out.
” Dershowitz said that the allegations , which came first from Virginia Roberts and then from Sarah Ransome , are “ totally made up.
” “ Look , as to the first woman who accused me , her own lawyer admitted in front of witnesses that she was wrong , just wrong , that I couldn ’ t have been in the places , ” he said .
Dershowitz recently appeared on the Law & Crime Network and discussed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he was not where Roberts said he was .
“ The second woman , ” he said , “ is a woman who wrote to the NY Post claiming she had video tapes of Hillary Clinton , Bill Clinton , Donald Trump having sex with underage girls .
The NY Post said , ‘ We don ’ t believe you.
’ They wouldn ’ t even publish her story , but , she ’ s one of the people.
” Dershowitz blamed it all on attorney David Boies , saying that the allegations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ furious at me because I filed Bar charges , unethical Bar charges against him.
” Dershowitz claimed that Boies “ threatened me , that unless I withdrew the Bar charges he would find somebody else to accuse me.
” Earlier in the interview , Dershowitz addressed a number of other issues , such as his problems with Special Counsel Robert Mueller ‘ s investigation , which he has often criticized in the past .

Alan Dershowitz has “secret” emails from Jeffrey Epstein that implicate VIPs, including household names, and will put “prominent people in handcuffs” when they are released.
“I can prove it, and I will prove it,” vowed Dershowitz in an interview Thursday morning with ‘Good Day New York.’
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
During the interview, Dershowitz pushed back against allegations that he had sex with underage girls through billionaire convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
According to Dershowitz, who recently joined President Trump’s impeachment defense team, he is being framed and he has emails that will put “prominent people in handcuffs.”
“There are emails so far that are secret, but that prove, not only that I was framed, but who framed me,” Dershowitz said. “It names names. These people are going to go to jail once these e-mails come out because this was a total frame up for financial reasons, and I can prove it, and will prove it. Have me back on the show when the e-mails come out, boy it will be so interesting because there will be prominent people in handcuffs. Prominent people in handcuffs once these e-mails come out.”
Dershowitz said that the allegations, which came first from Virginia Roberts and then from Sarah Ransome, are “totally made up.”
“Look, as to the first woman who accused me, her own lawyer admitted in front of witnesses that she was wrong, just wrong, that I couldn’t have been in the places,” he said. Dershowitz recently appeared on the Law&Crime Network and discussed how he has records to prove that he was not where Roberts said he was.
“The second woman,” he said, “is a woman who wrote to the NY Post claiming she had video tapes of Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Donald Trump having sex with underage girls. The NY Post said, ‘We don’t believe you.’ They wouldn’t even publish her story, but, she’s one of the people.”
Dershowitz blamed it all on attorney David Boies, saying that the allegations are his doing because Boies “is furious at me because I filed Bar charges, unethical Bar charges against him.” Dershowitz claimed that Boies “threatened me, that unless I withdrew the Bar charges he would find somebody else to accuse me.”
Earlier in the interview, Dershowitz addressed a number of other issues, such as his problems with Special Counsel Robert Mueller‘s investigation, which he has often criticized in the past.


newspunch--2020-01-20--Michael Moore Admits Defeat: ‘Mark January 13 As The Day Donald Trump Was Re-Elected’

Far-left activist and filmmaker Michael Moore has hoisted the while flag , thrown in the towel and admitted defeat .
According to Moore , President Trump has already defeated all of the Democrat candidates for the presidency before the election campaign has begun in earnest .
Michael Moore weighed in on the feud between Senators and Democratic presidential primary candidates Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders in an interview with Margaret Hoover on PBS ’ s “ Firing Line ” and announced that Americans can mark January 13 as the date Democrats blew any chances they had in the November election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was very sad , ” Moore said about the Elizabeth Warren vs Bernie Sanders sexism scandal .
“ I still , as we tape this , do not understand why Elizabeth ’ s people did that , and why she just couldn ’ t .
You couldn ’ t even read in her statement what was really said or what happened.
” “ Again , I know her and I ’ ve had her in my films and I have always loved her , and so I ’ m just… ” Moore said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has to be about Trump , it has to be about the system that gave us Trump , to make sure that doesn ’ t happen again .
And the fact that we would be talking about this — I have known Bernie since the 80s .
There ’ s no way he said anything like the way it ’ s been reported.
“ “ So , to be honest , the night that happened my first thought was that they will mark this day , January 13 , as the day Donald @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Democrats , the liberals , the left couldn ’ t get it together , couldn ’ t figure instead of much , so happy to get right in there and fight each other like this.
” “ And I ’ m like , when are we ever going to learn ?
” “ This is on us , this is not on the Russians , it is not on the Republicans , it is on the Democratic Party for not getting its act together and not using its head , ” he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ why he feels this way in the latest episode of his podcast , “ RUMBLE ” :

877 SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Far-left activist and filmmaker Michael Moore has hoisted the while flag, thrown in the towel and admitted defeat. According to Moore, President Trump has already defeated all of the Democrat candidates for the presidency before the election campaign has begun in earnest.
Michael Moore weighed in on the feud between Senators and Democratic presidential primary candidates Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders in an interview with Margaret Hoover on PBS’s “Firing Line” and announced that Americans can mark January 13 as the date Democrats blew any chances they had in the November election and Trump was re-elected.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
“It was very sad,” Moore said about the Elizabeth Warren vs Bernie Sanders sexism scandal. “I still, as we tape this, do not understand why Elizabeth’s people did that, and why she just couldn’t. You couldn’t even read in her statement what was really said or what happened.”
“Again, I know her and I’ve had her in my films and I have always loved her, and so I’m just…” Moore said, briefly speechless.
“The focus has to be about Trump, it has to be about the system that gave us Trump, to make sure that doesn’t happen again. And the fact that we would be talking about this — I have known Bernie since the 80s. There’s no way he said anything like the way it’s been reported.“
“So, to be honest, the night that happened my first thought was that they will mark this day, January 13, as the day Donald Trump was re-elected, because once again the Democrats, the liberals, the left couldn’t get it together, couldn’t figure instead of much, so happy to get right in there and fight each other like this.”
“And I’m like, when are we ever going to learn?”
“This is on us, this is not on the Russians, it is not on the Republicans, it is on the Democratic Party for not getting its act together and not using its head,” he said.
Michael Moore explained more about why he feels this way in the latest episode of his podcast, “RUMBLE”:


newspunch--2020-01-20--Cher: ‘Trump’s Re-election Will Make Him King And The US As We Know It Will Cease To Exist’

According to left-wing activist and pop star Cher , President Trump is set to become a “ king ” and the United States of America will “ cease to exist ” as we know it when he wins re-election in November .
“ PUTN IS NOW [ KING ] OF RUSSIA .
Trump ’ s RE~ELECTION WILL MAKE HIM [ KING ] , & [ AMERICA ] AS ” WE KNOW IT ” WILL CEASE 2 EXIST , ” Cher said in her latest emoji-filled Twitter rant .
“ [ King ] Trump ’ s SHOWN 3 YRS OF ETHICAL @ @ @ @ @ @ @ [ death ] OF FREEDOM.
” The hysterical pop singer was reacting to news that Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev and the country ’ s government plan to resign and allow President Putin to rewrite the country ’ s constitution , a move many experts believe will include provisions for Putin to become prime minister and de facto leader of Russia for life .
The UK Guardian observed that while Putin ’ s changes nominally transfer more power to the legislature , skeptics immediately deduced the true purpose is to consolidate Putin ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ office that would have no term limits while giving him an opportunity to set up a hand-picked presidential successor as the new prime minister .
Russian news reports described Mikhail Mishustin , presently head of the Russian Federal Tax Service , as the most likely candidate to replace Medvedev as prime minister .
This latest freakout by the increasingly unstable Cher is similar to another end-of-America-as-we-know-it-because-Trump-Putin prediction she made last June .
“ ONLY IMPORTANT THING IS BEATING Trump‼IF trump WINS 2ND TERM THERE ’ LL B NO‼WE WONT B ABLE 2 EXACT @ @ @ @ @ @ @ GUTTING OUR GOV , ” Cher ranted .
“ Trump PUTS RICH , CORRUPT , CRONIES IN CHARGE OF AGENCIES THEY KNOW NOTHING ABOUT,4 .
IF DEMS LOSE THEY CANT CHANGE ANYTHING .
”

3.6k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
According to left-wing activist and pop star Cher, President Trump is set to become a “king” and the United States of America will “cease to exist” as we know it when he wins re-election in November.
“PUTN IS NOW [KING] OF RUSSIA. Trump’s RE~ELECTION WILL MAKE HIM [KING], & [AMERICA] AS”WE KNOW IT”WILL CEASE 2 EXIST,” Cher said in her latest emoji-filled Twitter rant. “[King] Trump’s SHOWN 3 YRS OF ETHICAL & INTELLECTUAL BANKRUPTCY. trump IS THE [death] OF FREEDOM.”
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Putin is sending a message to the world with his shock announcementhttps://t.co/n6lXy5arWj
PUTN IS NOW👑 OF RUSSIA.trump’s RE~ELECTION WILL MAKE HIM👑,& 🇺🇸AS”WE KNOW IT”WILL CEASE 2 EXIST.
👑trump’s SHOWN 3 YRS OF ETHICAL& INTELLECTUAL BANKRUPTCY.👑trump IS THE⚰OF FREEDOM — Cher (@cher) January 18, 2020
The hysterical pop singer was reacting to news that Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev and the country’s government plan to resign and allow President Putin to rewrite the country’s constitution, a move many experts believe will include provisions for Putin to become prime minister and de facto leader of Russia for life.
As Breitbart’s John Hayward notes:
The UK Guardian observed that while Putin’s changes nominally transfer more power to the legislature, skeptics immediately deduced the true purpose is to consolidate Putin’s power in perpetuity under some new office that would have no term limits while giving him an opportunity to set up a hand-picked presidential successor as the new prime minister. Russian news reports described Mikhail Mishustin, presently head of the Russian Federal Tax Service, as the most likely candidate to replace Medvedev as prime minister.
This latest freakout by the increasingly unstable Cher is similar to another end-of-America-as-we-know-it-because-Trump-Putin prediction she made last June.
“ONLY IMPORTANT THING IS BEATING Trump‼IF trump WINS 2ND TERM THERE’LL B NO‼WE WONT B ABLE 2 EXACT PUNISHMENT,OR PUT HIM IN ⛓⛓4 GUTTING OUR GOV,” Cher ranted. “Trump PUTS RICH, CORRUPT,CRONIES IN CHARGE OF AGENCIES THEY KNOW NOTHING ABOUT,4. IF DEMS LOSE THEY CANT CHANGE ANYTHING.”


newspunch--2020-01-20--Schiff Threatens Republicans: Hold Fair Trial Or ‘Be Held Accountable’

Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff warned Senate Republicans that if they fail to allow witnesses in the impeachment of President Trump , they will be held accountable for their actions .
On Sunday ’ s broadcast of ABC ’ s “ This Week , ” Schiff declared , “ We will be fighting for a fair trial.
” He continued , “ If the Senate decides if the Senator McConnell prevails and there are no witnesses , it will be the first impeachment trial that goes to conclusion without witnesses .
The atmosphere in the Senate when I came with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the articles was one befitting something that has only happened three times in the nation ’ s history .
I intend during the trial to be respectful of the senators , to operate from the presumption that they do take their oath seriously , but also with the knowledge that Americans are watching , that they ’ re going to demand a fair trial , and if the senators don ’ t give the country a fair trial , one that ’ s fair to the president , but also fair to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ held accountable .
So that ’ s the approach I intend to take .
”

3.3k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff warned Senate Republicans that if they fail to allow witnesses in the impeachment of President Trump, they will be held accountable for their actions.
On Sunday’s broadcast of ABC’s “This Week,” Schiff declared, “We will be fighting for a fair trial.”
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
He continued, “If the Senate decides if the Senator McConnell prevails and there are no witnesses, it will be the first impeachment trial that goes to conclusion without witnesses. The atmosphere in the Senate when I came with the other House managers, and we read the articles was one befitting something that has only happened three times in the nation’s history. I intend during the trial to be respectful of the senators, to operate from the presumption that they do take their oath seriously, but also with the knowledge that Americans are watching, that they’re going to demand a fair trial, and if the senators don’t give the country a fair trial, one that’s fair to the president, but also fair to the American people, the senators will be held accountable. So that’s the approach I intend to take.”