newspunch--2020-02-17--Hungarian Foreign Minister Says UN’s Push For Mass Migration Threatens ‘Whole of Humanity’

The UN is funding programs that encourage people in third-world countries to leave their homelands and migrate to the United States and European nations , according to Hungarian foreign minister Péter Szijjárt .
Instead of spending money on counter-terrorism , the UN is spending funds on facilitating a program of mass migration that threatens the “ whole of humanity.
” , Szijjártó told a conference in Vienna on Tuesday .
This mass migration process poses “ a very serious threat to the whole of humanity , ” said Szijjártó .
“ We call on the UN to include in its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on migration , ” the minister told the conference , which was organized by the UN .
Summit report : Passed in 2018 , the UN Compact on Migration is not legally binding , but governments are under international pressure to follow its mandates .
British MEP Janice Atkinson warned that the pact could lead to Europe being flooded with 59 million new migrants within the next 6 years .
Dutch MEP Marcel de Graaff also said that the pact would grease the skids for laws that would criminalize criticism of mass immigration @ @ @ @ @ @ @ signed an open letter accusing President Macron of “ treason ” for committing France to the pact were later hit with disciplinary action .
While Britain and numerous other western countries signed the migration pact , the United States refused to do so .
A 2001 United Nations document entitled ‘ Replacement Migration : Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations ?
’ outlined a plan to flood America and Europe with hundreds of millions of migrants in order to maintain population levels .
Under the most severe scenario , large @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ maintain the potential support ratio ” ( of a population ) at the highest level .
In the case of the United States , under the most extreme scenario , the report states , “ It would be necessary to have 593 million immigrants from 1995 to 2050 , an average of 10.8 million per year.
” “ By 2050 , out of a United States total population of 1.1 billion , 775 million , or 73 per cent , would be post 1995 immigrants or their descendants , ” adds the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the document asserts that at least 159 million migrant workers will need to enter by 2025 in order , “ to maintain the current balance of 4 to 5 workers for a pensioner.
” Under the worst case scenario , 1.4 billion migrants would be needed by 2050 , an average of 25.2 million a year .
This means that by 2050 , Europe ’ s population would be 2.3 billion , of which 1.7 billion , almost three quarters , would be migrants or their descendents .

1.8k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
The UN is funding programs that encourage people in third-world countries to leave their homelands and migrate to the United States and European nations, according to Hungarian foreign minister Péter Szijjárt.
Instead of spending money on counter-terrorism, the UN is spending funds on facilitating a program of mass migration that threatens the “whole of humanity.”, Szijjártó told a conference in Vienna on Tuesday.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
This mass migration process poses “a very serious threat to the whole of humanity,” said Szijjártó.
“We call on the UN to include in its budget counter-terrorism … and to spend less on migration,” the minister told the conference, which was organized by the UN.
Summit report: Passed in 2018, the UN Compact on Migration is not legally binding, but governments are under international pressure to follow its mandates.
British MEP Janice Atkinson warned that the pact could lead to Europe being flooded with 59 million new migrants within the next 6 years.
Dutch MEP Marcel de Graaff also said that the pact would grease the skids for laws that would criminalize criticism of mass immigration as hate speech.
French generals who signed an open letter accusing President Macron of “treason” for committing France to the pact were later hit with disciplinary action.
While Britain and numerous other western countries signed the migration pact, the United States refused to do so.
A 2001 United Nations document entitled ‘Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?’ outlined a plan to flood America and Europe with hundreds of millions of migrants in order to maintain population levels.
Under the most severe scenario, large numbers of migrants will be required to “maintain the potential support ratio” (of a population) at the highest level.
In the case of the United States, under the most extreme scenario, the report states, “It would be necessary to have 593 million immigrants from 1995 to 2050, an average of 10.8 million per year.”
“By 2050, out of a United States total population of 1.1 billion, 775 million, or 73 per cent, would be post 1995 immigrants or their descendants,” adds the report.
In Europe’s case, the document asserts that at least 159 million migrant workers will need to enter by 2025 in order, “to maintain the current balance of 4 to 5 workers for a pensioner.”
Under the worst case scenario, 1.4 billion migrants would be needed by 2050, an average of 25.2 million a year. This means that by 2050, Europe’s population would be 2.3 billion, of which 1.7 billion, almost three quarters, would be migrants or their descendents.


newspunch--2020-02-17--Royal Family Website Caught Linking Users To XXX Site With Click Throughs To ‘Incest Porn’

Britain ’ s royal family is facing yet another embarrassment — with its official website sending users to a hardcore Chinese porn site with links to live sex shows and incest porn .
Royal.uk opens with a photo of a smiling Queen Elizabeth II next to husband Prince Philip , proudly declaring itself “ the home of the Royal Family ” and showcasing all the senior royal family members .
It also links to charities getting royal support and approval — with one link for a charity patronized by Prince Harry mistakenly taking users to a Chinese porn site , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Welsh charity Dolen Cymru , web surfers were confronted with videos of couples having sex , along with flashing click-throughs to “ rape incest porn ” and “ live sex shows.
” The hardcore porn site has the same name as the Welsh non-profit , leading many to believe the pornographic link was inserted in error .
The British newspaper alerted Buckingham Palace and the charity to the embarrassing mistake and by Monday morning the correct link was in place .
Prince Harry has called the charity — which helps communities in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ invaluable , ” The Sun reports .

808 SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Britain’s royal family is facing yet another embarrassment — with its official website sending users to a hardcore Chinese porn site with links to live sex shows and incest porn.
Royal.uk opens with a photo of a smiling Queen Elizabeth II next to husband Prince Philip, proudly declaring itself “the home of the Royal Family” and showcasing all the senior royal family members.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
It also links to charities getting royal support and approval — with one link for a charity patronized by Prince Harry mistakenly taking users to a Chinese porn site, The Sun reported.
However, instead of Welsh charity Dolen Cymru, web surfers were confronted with videos of couples having sex, along with flashing click-throughs to “rape incest porn” and “live sex shows.”
The hardcore porn site has the same name as the Welsh non-profit, leading many to believe the pornographic link was inserted in error.
The British newspaper alerted Buckingham Palace and the charity to the embarrassing mistake and by Monday morning the correct link was in place.
Prince Harry has called the charity — which helps communities in Wales and South Africa — “quite invaluable,” The Sun reports.


newspunch--2020-02-17--Bloomberg Says We Should Deny Healthcare To Some Elderly People: ‘If You Show Up with Cancer and You

Bloomberg Says We Should Deny Healthcare To Some Elderly People: ‘If You Show Up with Cancer and You’re 95 – We Should Say We Can’t Do Anything’

America should deny health care to some elderly citizens , according to Democrat presidential candidate Mike Bloomberg , who recently announced his plans to prop up and build on Obamacare .
According to Bloomberg , doctors should turn away some elderly patients , telling them to “ go and enjoy , you ’ ve had a long life ” because healthcare will “ bankrupt us , ” unless American society becomes willing to deny care to these senior citizens .
Speaking to potential voters on the campaign trail , Mike Bloomberg outlined his vision for an America in which elderly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ All of these costs keep going up .
Nobody wants to pay anymore money .
And at the rate we ’ re going healthcare is going to bankrupt us .
So not only do we have a problem we ’ ve got to sit here and say which things we ’ re going to do and which things we ’ re not .
Nobody wants to do that .
“ If you show up with prostrate cancer and you ’ re 95 years old , we should say go and enjoy , you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there ’ s no cure and we can ’ t do anything .
If you ’ re a young person , we should do something about it .
Society ’ s not willing to do that , yet.
” Bloomberg was singing from a different hymn sheet in November when he outlined his healthcare policy , stating “ No one should have to forgo care because they don ’ t have insurance , and no one should face hardships because of medical bills.
” However in his unguarded moments , it seems the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disturbing vision for America under a Bloomberg administration .

41.9k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
America should deny health care to some elderly citizens who have prostate cancer, according to Democrat presidential candidate Mike Bloomberg, who recently announced his plans to prop up and build on Obamacare.
According to Bloomberg, doctors should turn away some elderly patients who suffer from prostate cancer, telling them to “go and enjoy, you’ve had a long life.”
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Speaking to potential voters on the campaign trail, Mike Bloomberg outlined his vision for an America in which some unfortunate elderly citizens are treated as disposable:
“All of these costs keep going up. Nobody wants to pay anymore money. And at the rate we’re going healthcare is going to bankrupt us. So not only do we have a problem we’ve got to sit here and say which things we’re going to do and which things we’re not. Nobody wants to do that.
“If you show up with prostrate cancer and you’re 95 years old, we should say go and enjoy, you’ve had a long life, there’s no cure and we can’t do anything. If you’re a young person, we should do something about it. Society’s not willing to do that, yet.”
https://twitter.com/CANCEL_SAM/status/1229127380402393088?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1229127380402393088&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2020%2F02%2Fif-you-show-up-with-cancer-and-youre-95-we-should-say-we-cant-do-anything-bloomberg-explains-how-healthcare-will-bankrupt-us-unless-we-deny-care-to-elderly%2F
Spoken like a true heartless socialist. How despicable.
Bloomberg was singing from a different hymn sheet in November when he outlined his healthcare policy, stating “No one should have to forgo care because they don’t have insurance, and no one should face hardships because of medical bills.”
However in his unguarded moments, it seems the 78-year-old billionaire has a very different and disturbing vision for America under a Bloomberg administration.
Correction: An earlier version of this article neglected to mention that Bloomberg’s comments were in specific reference to elderly people suffering from prostate cancer. We have updated the headline to make this clear.


newspunch--2020-02-17--Pete Buttigieg Says He Is Above Being ‘Lectured On Family Values’ By Trump Supporters

Democrat presidential frontrunner Pete Buttigieg said Sunday that he will not be “ lectured on family values ” by anyone who supports President Trump .
The former mayor , who is an abortion extremist , spoke on “ Fox News Sunday ” with anchor Chris Wallace , who brought up comments made by Rush Limbaugh and “ America First ” host Sebastian Gorka about Buttigieg ’ s stances on abortion and electability .
“ A gay guy , 37 years old , loves kissing his husband on debate stages .
Can you see [ President Donald ] Trump have fun @ @ @ @ @ @ @ while Gorka questioned , “ Why is a homosexual man lecturing us about the sanctity of life in the womb ?
Just a little curious there , strange.
” “ What is your reaction to those comments ?
” Wallace asked Buttigieg .
The homosexual presidential candidate , whose father was a Marxist professor at Notre Dame , responded : “ I am in a faithful , loving , committed marriage .
I ’ m proud of my marriage , and I ’ m proud of my husband.
” “ And I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ family values from the likes of Rush Limbaugh or anybody who supports Donald J. Trump as the moral as well as political leader of the United States .
America has moved on , and we should have politics of belonging that welcomes everybody .
That ’ s what the American people are for .
And I am saddened for what the Republican Party has become if they embrace that kind of homophobic rhetoric.
“ Buttigieg also commented on whether Americans would vote for a gay presidential candidate and noted that he came out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was governor of Indiana .
“ We didn ’ t know what would happen .
I ’ ll tell you what happened , ” he said .
“ I got reelected with 80 % of the vote in my generally Democratic but socially conservative community , more than I had the first time that I ran for office , ” he continued , adding : “ When it comes to LGBTQ issues … the most important thing is not the treatment of candidates , it ’ s what ’ s happening to individuals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ service members who have their careers threatened by this president .
”

1.9k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Democrat presidential frontrunner Pete Buttigieg said Sunday that he will not be “lectured on family values” by anyone who supports President Trump.
The former mayor, who is an abortion extremist, spoke on “Fox News Sunday” with anchor Chris Wallace, who brought up comments made by Rush Limbaugh and “America First” host Sebastian Gorka about Buttigieg’s stances on abortion and electability.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
“A gay guy, 37 years old, loves kissing his husband on debate stages. Can you see [President Donald] Trump have fun with that?” Limbaugh asked, while Gorka questioned, “Why is a homosexual man lecturing us about the sanctity of life in the womb? Just a little curious there, strange.”
“What is your reaction to those comments?” Wallace asked Buttigieg.
The homosexual presidential candidate, whose father was a Marxist professor at Notre Dame, responded: “I am in a faithful, loving, committed marriage. I’m proud of my marriage, and I’m proud of my husband.”
He added:
“And I’m not going to be lectured on family values from the likes of Rush Limbaugh or anybody who supports Donald J. Trump as the moral as well as political leader of the United States. America has moved on, and we should have politics of belonging that welcomes everybody. That’s what the American people are for. And I am saddened for what the Republican Party has become if they embrace that kind of homophobic rhetoric.“
DailyCaller report:
Buttigieg also commented on whether Americans would vote for a gay presidential candidate and noted that he came out as gay while Vice President Mike Pence was governor of Indiana.
“We didn’t know what would happen. I’ll tell you what happened,” he said.
“I got reelected with 80% of the vote in my generally Democratic but socially conservative community, more than I had the first time that I ran for office,” he continued, adding:
“When it comes to LGBTQ issues … the most important thing is not the treatment of candidates, it’s what’s happening to individuals and families across the country from brave service members who have their careers threatened by this president.”


newspunch--2020-02-17--CNN Anchor Says Trump Was Acquitted — Nasty Nancy Interrupts, Claims He Wasn’t

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi went on an unhinged rant on CNN this week , interrupting the host and petulantly demanding that President Donald Trump “ was not acquitted ” in the Senate impeachment trial .
“ What about , though , the fact that the president seems liberated , and this is about democratic politics so I ’ m not asking you to criticize here , but he was acquitted , his poll ratings are high … ” CNN host Christiane Amanpour said .
Nancy Pelosi couldn ’ t accept this dose of reality from the host .
With venom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ butted in and slurred her way through a series of wild conspiracy theories and demonstrably false Democrat talking points .
“ He was not … there was no… ” Pelosi stammered , before continuing incoherently : “ You can ’ t have an acquittal unless you have a trial , and you can ’ t have a trial unless you have witnesses and documents .
So he can say he ’ s acquitted , and the headlines can say ‘ acquitted , ’ but he ’ s impeached forever , branded with that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ continued .
“ And even the senators were saying , ‘ yes , it wasn ’ t right , ’ but they didn ’ t have the courage to act upon that.
” This is not the first time senior Democrats have made this false claim .
Earlier this month , the Democrat House managers in the impeachment trial denied that Trump was acquitted , telling the world that the US Senate didn ’ t give Trump a “ fair trial.
” In the real world , far away from Democrat misinformation and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ indeed did vote to acquit Trump in the impeachment trial .
Every Republican bar one , Sen. Mitt Romney , voted against the charge of abuse of power , and all Republicans unanimously voted against the charge of obstruction .

3.3k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi went on an unhinged rant on CNN this week, interrupting the host and petulantly demanding that President Donald Trump “was not acquitted” in the Senate impeachment trial.
“What about, though, the fact that the president seems liberated, and this is about democratic politics so I’m not asking you to criticize here, but he was acquitted, his poll ratings are high …” CNN host Christiane Amanpour said.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Nancy Pelosi couldn’t accept this dose of reality from the host. With venom coming out of her ears, she butted in and slurred her way through a series of wild conspiracy theories and demonstrably false Democrat talking points.
“He was not … there was no…” Pelosi stammered, before continuing incoherently:
“You can’t have an acquittal unless you have a trial, and you can’t have a trial unless you have witnesses and documents. So he can say he’s acquitted, and the headlines can say ‘acquitted,’ but he’s impeached forever, branded with that, and not vindicated,” Pelosi continued.
“And even the senators were saying, ‘yes, it wasn’t right,’ but they didn’t have the courage to act upon that.”
This is not the first time senior Democrats have made this false claim. Earlier this month, the Democrat House managers in the impeachment trial denied that Trump was acquitted, telling the world that the US Senate didn’t give Trump a “fair trial.”
[RELATED: Mitt Romney Caught Taking Big Money Donations From Soros Fund Management]
In the real world, far away from Democrat misinformation and tin-foil hat conspiracy theories, the Senate indeed did vote to acquit Trump in the impeachment trial.
Every Republican bar one, Sen. Mitt Romney, voted against the charge of abuse of power, and all Republicans unanimously voted against the charge of obstruction.


newspunch--2020-02-17--Pelosi Warns That Democrats Must Unite To Prevent Trump Getting Re-elected

Nancy Pelosi has called for unity among Democrats and their candidates in the upcoming presidential election to ensure President Trump does not get elected for a second term .
In an exclusive interview with CNN from the Munich Security Conference on Saturday , nasty Nancy said : “ We have to have our own vision for the future , but everybody knows that we must be unified in making sure that he doesn ’ t have a second term ” Press TV reports : Pelosi also told the American TV news channel that she “ can ’ t even envision @ @ @ @ @ @ @ re-elected , but added , “ We don ’ t take anything for granted.
” The House speaker underlined that any of the candidates in the crowded Democratic field “ would be a better president than the current occupant of the White House , but we want to be very positive about how we go forth.
” The Democratic Party started with about 20 hopefuls for the 2020 US election race but the filed has so far shrunk to eight following the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary .
Senator Bernie Sanders ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ week ’ s New Hampshire primary .
With the Nevada primary just a week away , a Morning Consult poll published this week put the progressive senator ten points ahead of Joe Biden , the former vice president , and until now the supposed front-runner for the 2020 Democratic Party ’ s nomination .

2.5k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Nancy Pelosi has called for unity among Democrats and their candidates in the upcoming presidential election to ensure President Trump does not get elected for a second term.
In an exclusive interview with CNN from the Munich Security Conference on Saturday, nasty Nancy said: “We have to have our own vision for the future, but everybody knows that we must be unified in making sure that he doesn’t have a second term”
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Press TV reports: Pelosi also told the American TV news channel that she “can’t even envision a situation” where Trump would be re-elected, but added, “We don’t take anything for granted.”
The House speaker underlined that any of the candidates in the crowded Democratic field “would be a better president than the current occupant of the White House, but we want to be very positive about how we go forth.”
The Democratic Party started with about 20 hopefuls for the 2020 US election race but the filed has so far shrunk to eight following the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary.
Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) came out victorious in last week’s New Hampshire primary.
With the Nevada primary just a week away, a Morning Consult poll published this week put the progressive senator ten points ahead of Joe Biden, the former vice president, and until now the supposed front-runner for the 2020 Democratic Party’s nomination.


newspunch--2020-02-17--Bloomberg Says We Should Deny Healthcare To Some Elderly People: ‘If You Show Up with Prostate Cance

Bloomberg Says We Should Deny Healthcare To Some Elderly People: ‘If You Show Up with Prostate Cancer and You’re 95 – We Should Say We Can’t Do Anything’

America should deny health care to some elderly citizens who have prostate cancer , according to Democrat presidential candidate Mike Bloomberg , who recently announced his plans to prop up and build on Obamacare .
According to Bloomberg , doctors should turn away some elderly patients who suffer from prostate cancer , telling them to “ go and enjoy , you ’ ve had a long life.
” Speaking to potential voters on the campaign trail , Mike Bloomberg outlined his vision for an America in which some unfortunate elderly citizens are treated as disposable : “ All of these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to pay anymore money .
And at the rate we ’ re going healthcare is going to bankrupt us .
So not only do we have a problem we ’ ve got to sit here and say which things we ’ re going to do and which things we ’ re not .
Nobody wants to do that .
“ If you show up with prostrate cancer and you ’ re 95 years old , we should say go and enjoy , you ’ ve had a long life , there ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do anything .
If you ’ re a young person , we should do something about it .
Society ’ s not willing to do that , yet.
” Bloomberg was singing from a different hymn sheet in November when he outlined his healthcare policy , stating “ No one should have to forgo care because they don ’ t have insurance , and no one should face hardships because of medical bills.
” However in his unguarded moments , it seems the 78-year-old billionaire has a very different and disturbing vision for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : An earlier version of this article neglected to mention that Bloomberg ’ s comments were in specific reference to elderly people suffering from prostate cancer .
We have updated the headline to make this clear .


newspunch--2020-02-18--The Queen Can’t Help Julian Assange Because ‘The Matter Is Political’

The Queen will not be intervening to help get Julian Assange released from prison and has vowed to remain “ non-political ” on the matter , a Buckingham Palace spokeswoman has said .
A statement issued by the Palace , following a request for the Queens support , appears to confirm that Assange ’ s detention is a political , not criminal , matter .
Doctors and psychologists have warned that Julian Assange is about to die due to the torture he is experiencing in prison .
RT reports : With WikiLeaks founder Assange holed up in HM Prison Belmarsh @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Chris Lonsdale penned a letter to Queen Elizabeth II last month , asking the monarch to “ ensure that Mr. Julian Assange is freed from Belmarsh Prison unconditionally , ” in the spirit of “ justice , peace and fair-mindedness.
” In a reply posted by Lonsdale on Sunday , a spokeswoman for the Queen said that Her Majesty “ remains strictly non-political at all times , ” and Assange ’ s detention is therefore “ not a matter in which the Queen would intervene.
” Assange ’ s supporters have long argued @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by politics , not justice .
Assange has languished in Belmarsh since his arrest inside London ’ s Ecuadorian embassy last April , ostensibly on charges of skipping bail in 2012 .
He is also facing extradition to the US to answer to a litany of espionage charges , related to WikiLeaks ’ publication of classified US military documents detailing potential war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan .
If convicted , he faces 175 years in prison .
Buckingham Palace ’ s response seemingly admits that Assange is being persecuted on political grounds @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in steady decline since his incarceration .
Following a visit to Assange in May , UN rapporteur on torture Nils Melzer declared that the former WikiLeaks boss showed “ all the symptoms typical for prolonged exposure to psychological torture.
” Melzer added that Assange could be “ exposed to a real risk of serious violations of his human rights… including torture and other cruel , inhuman or degrading treatment ” if he were extradited to the US .
“ In 20 years of work with victims of war , violence and political persecution @ @ @ @ @ @ @ democratic States ganging up to deliberately isolate , demonise and abuse a single individual for such a long time and with so little regard for human dignity and the rule of law , ” Melzer said .
“ The collective persecution of Julian Assange must end here and now !
”

The Queen will not be intervening to help get Julian Assange released from prison and has vowed to remain “non-political” on the matter, a Buckingham Palace spokeswoman has said.
A statement issued by the Palace, following a request for the Queens support, appears to confirm that Assange’s detention is a political, not criminal, matter.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Doctors and psychologists have warned that Julian Assange is about to die due to the torture he is experiencing in prison.
RT reports: With WikiLeaks founder Assange holed up in HM Prison Belmarsh awaiting extradition to the US, activist Chris Lonsdale penned a letter to Queen Elizabeth II last month, asking the monarch to “ensure that Mr. Julian Assange is freed from Belmarsh Prison unconditionally,” in the spirit of “justice, peace and fair-mindedness.”
In a reply posted by Lonsdale on Sunday, a spokeswoman for the Queen said that Her Majesty “remains strictly non-political at all times,” and Assange’s detention is therefore “not a matter in which the Queen would intervene.”
I have received a reply back from Buckingham Palace following my letter & petition to the Queen in support of #JulianAssange some weeks ago. The response says, basically, that the Queen cannot intervene in issues which are Political. This should be used in court. pic.twitter.com/GJVRiAXcTV — Chris Lonsdale⏳ (@kungfu_mandarin) February 16, 2020
Assange’s supporters have long argued that his arrest and imprisonment are motivated by politics, not justice. Assange has languished in Belmarsh since his arrest inside London’s Ecuadorian embassy last April, ostensibly on charges of skipping bail in 2012. He is also facing extradition to the US to answer to a litany of espionage charges, related to WikiLeaks’ publication of classified US military documents detailing potential war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan. If convicted, he faces 175 years in prison.
Buckingham Palace’s response seemingly admits that Assange is being persecuted on political grounds.
Assange’s health has been in steady decline since his incarceration. Following a visit to Assange in May, UN rapporteur on torture Nils Melzer declared that the former WikiLeaks boss showed “all the symptoms typical for prolonged exposure to psychological torture.”
Melzer added that Assange could be “exposed to a real risk of serious violations of his human rights… including torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment” if he were extradited to the US.
“In 20 years of work with victims of war, violence and political persecution I have never seen a group of democratic States ganging up to deliberately isolate, demonise and abuse a single individual for such a long time and with so little regard for human dignity and the rule of law,” Melzer said. “The collective persecution of Julian Assange must end here and now!”


newspunch--2020-02-18--Nasty Nancy: America Cannot Withstand Second ‘DESTRUCTIVE’ Term From Trump

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has declared that America can not withstand the “ destruction ” President Trump would bring if @ @ @ @ @ .
“ I can ’ t even envision a situation where he would be reelected.
@ @ @ @ @ not—we don ’ t take anything for granted , ” Pelosi added .
“ As @ @ @ @ @ to have our own vision for the future.
” “ But everybody knows that we @ @ @ @ @ sure that he does not have a second term , ” Pelosi added .
“ @ @ @ @ @ The American people are wonderful.
” “ We ’ re a resilient country .
We @ @ @ @ @ “ But the destruction that he would do to the courts of our country , @ @ @ @ @ says I ’ m not going to use science as any basis for decisions on @ @ @ @ @ added .
“ When he says , Article 2 says I can do whatever I @ @ @ @ @ defeated .
”

5.6k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has declared that America cannot withstand the “destruction” President Trump would bring if he is reelected this November.
Speaking to CNN’s Christiane Amanpour, Pelosi said:
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
“I can’t even envision a situation where he would be reelected.”
“But we are not—we don’t take anything for granted,” Pelosi added.
“As I say, we have to have our own vision for the future.”
“But everybody knows that we must be unified and making sure that he does not have a second term,” Pelosi added.
“Our country is great. The American people are wonderful.”
“We’re a resilient country. We can withstand one term.”
“But the destruction that he would do to the courts of our country, and the environment where he says I’m not going to use science as any basis for decisions on the environment,” she added.
“When he says, Article 2 says I can do whatever I want. He must be defeated.”


newspunch--2020-02-18--Deep State Declare WAR: Federal Judges Hold Emergency Meeting Over Barr and Trump

Just weeks after President Trump was acquitted by the Senate of the sham impeachment charges , a group of federal judges are holding an “ emergency meeting ” on Tuesday .
The anti-Trump judges will meet to discuss the intervention by Attorney General William Barr against the proposed harsh sentence for Roger Stone and the criticism by President Trump of the Obama-appointed judge overseeing the case – Judge Amy Berman Jackson .
The Deep State group will also discuss other actions by Barr and Trump regarding “ politically sensitive ” cases before the judiciary .
Thegatewaypundit.com reports : The emergency @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with officers and members of the executive committee of the 1,100 member Federal Judges Association because , association president Judge Cynthia Rufe ( a Bush 43 appointee ) said , “ We just could not wait until April to discuss matters of this importance.
” The judges ’ annual meeting is set for April 18-19 in Denver .
The meeting comes on the heels of a letter signed by over 1,000 former Justice Department Deep State operatives calling on Barr to resign for overruling the punitive sentence of 7-9 years in prison proposed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ four prosecutors in the case resigned in protest over Barr ’ s intervention .
Judge Jackson will preside over a phone hearing in the Stone case on Tuesday .
Stone has asked for a new trial after it was reported last week the foreman of the jury that convicted him is a virulent anti-Trump Democrat who posted about Stone ’ s case .
A national association of federal judges has called an emergency meeting Tuesday to address growing concerns about the intervention of Justice Department officials and President Donald Trump in politically sensitive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said Monday .
Philadelphia U.S. District Judge Cynthia Rufe , who heads the independent Federal Judges Association , said the group “ could not wait ” until its spring conference to weigh in on a deepening crisis that has enveloped the Justice Department and Attorney General William Barr .
“ There are plenty of issues that we are concerned about , ” Rufe told USA TODAY .
“ We ’ ll talk all of this through.
” …Rufe said the judges ’ association is “ not inclined to get involved with an ongoing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ support for Jackson .
“ I am not concerned with how a particular judge will rule , ” Rufe said , praising Jackson ’ s reputation .
“ We are supportive of any federal judge who does what is required.
” Rufe said the group has not decided how it will report the result of its meeting , if at all .
“ We just could not …wait until April to discuss matters of this importance , ” she said .
After Trump took Jackson to task on Twitter last week , another @ @ @ @ @ @ @ District Judge Beryl Howell – appeared to rally to Jackson ’ s side .
“ The Judges of this Court base their sentencing decisions on careful consideration of the actual record in the case before them ; the applicable sentencing guidelines and statutory factors ; the submissions of the parties , the Probation Office and victims ; and their own judgment and experience , ” Howell said in a written statement .
“ Public criticism or pressure is not a factor.
” End excerpt .
Please read entire USA Today article at this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ FJA ) is a national voluntary organization of United States federal judges , appointed pursuant to Article III of the Constitution , whose mission is to support and enhance the role of its members within a fair , impartial and independent judiciary ; to actively build a community of interest among its members ; and to sustain our system of justice through civics education and public outreach .
The independence of Article III judges is assured under the Constitution by their appointment for life without diminution in pay .
Nominated by the President @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the United States Senate , Article III judges are thus protected from intimidation , undue influence , coercion , or domination so that they may judge fairly and independently in every case , as the law and facts require .
Inevitably , from time to time , some judicial decisions are unpopular .
The FJA , as an independent organization , can speak in one voice to protect the independence of the judiciary and to explain its significance to a free society .
The Association expresses the collective view of Article III judges @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public on issues related to fair and impartial courts .

2.8k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Just weeks after President Trump was acquitted by the Senate of the sham impeachment charges, a group of federal judges are holding an “emergency meeting” on Tuesday.
The anti-Trump judges will meet to discuss the intervention by Attorney General William Barr against the proposed harsh sentence for Roger Stone and the criticism by President Trump of the Obama-appointed judge overseeing the case – Judge Amy Berman Jackson.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
The Deep State group will also discuss other actions by Barr and Trump regarding “politically sensitive” cases before the judiciary.
Thegatewaypundit.com reports:The emergency meeting will be held via conference call with officers and members of the executive committee of the 1,100 member Federal Judges Association because, association president Judge Cynthia Rufe (a Bush 43 appointee) said, “We just could not wait until April to discuss matters of this importance.” The judges’ annual meeting is set for April 18-19 in Denver.
The meeting comes on the heels of a letter signed by over 1,000 former Justice Department Deep State operatives calling on Barr to resign for overruling the punitive sentence of 7-9 years in prison proposed by federal prosecutors for Stone. The four prosecutors in the case resigned in protest over Barr’s intervention.
Judge Jackson will preside over a phone hearing in the Stone case on Tuesday. Stone has asked for a new trial after it was reported last week the foreman of the jury that convicted him is a virulent anti-Trump Democrat who posted about Stone’s case.
USA Today reported on the emergency meeting:
A national association of federal judges has called an emergency meeting Tuesday to address growing concerns about the intervention of Justice Department officials and President Donald Trump in politically sensitive cases, the group’s president said Monday. Philadelphia U.S. District Judge Cynthia Rufe, who heads the independent Federal Judges Association, said the group “could not wait” until its spring conference to weigh in on a deepening crisis that has enveloped the Justice Department and Attorney General William Barr. “There are plenty of issues that we are concerned about,” Rufe told USA TODAY. “We’ll talk all of this through.” …Rufe said the judges’ association is “not inclined to get involved with an ongoing case,” but she voiced strong support for Jackson.
“I am not concerned with how a particular judge will rule,” Rufe said, praising Jackson’s reputation. “We are supportive of any federal judge who does what is required.” Rufe said the group has not decided how it will report the result of its meeting, if at all. “We just could not …wait until April to discuss matters of this importance,” she said. After Trump took Jackson to task on Twitter last week, another jurist – District of Columbia Chief U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell – appeared to rally to Jackson’s side. “The Judges of this Court base their sentencing decisions on careful consideration of the actual record in the case before them; the applicable sentencing guidelines and statutory factors; the submissions of the parties, the Probation Office and victims; and their own judgment and experience,” Howell said in a written statement. “Public criticism or pressure is not a factor.”
End excerpt. Please read entire USA Today article at this link.
The Federal Judges Association describes itself:


newspunch--2020-02-18--Julian Assange About to Die ‘Due to Psychological Torture,’ Doctors Warn

A group of doctors and psychologists has warned that Julian Assange is about to die due to the torture he is experiencing in prison .
The 117-strong group penned an open letter in The Lancet medical journal , warning that the WikiLeaks founder could be “ effectively tortured to death in prison.
” They urge the UK government to end “ the psychological torture and medical neglect ” of Assange .
Sky.com reports : Mr Assange is being held in Belmarsh prison ahead of a hearing on 24 February which could result in him being extradited to the US .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ US , including conspiring to hack into a classified Pentagon computer .
The letter says : “ Assange is in a dire state of health due to the effects of prolonged psychological torture in both the Ecuadorian embassy and Belmarsh prison , where he has been arbitrarily detained according to the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention .
“ Should Assange die in a UK prison , as the UN special rapporteur on torture has warned , he will have effectively been tortured to death .
“ The medical profession can not afford @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wrong side of torture and the wrong side of history , while such a travesty unfolds.
” The letter also sets out accusations of “ politically motivated medical neglect ” which it says “ sets a dangerous precedent ” .
It adds : “ Politics can not be allowed to interfere with the right to health and the practice of medicine .
“ Our appeals are simple : we are calling upon governments to end the torture of Mr Assange and ensure his access to the best available healthcare , before it is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ letter has been sent to the UK government and the Australian minister for foreign affairs , Marise Payne .
The Doctors for Assange group has previously written to the home secretary and the Australian government to express concern for his welfare .
In a November 2019 letter , the group said it had “ serious concerns ” about his fitness to stand trial .
Last year , UN special rapporteur on torture Nils Melzer visited the WikiLeaks founder in Belmarsh and reported that he “ showed all symptoms typical for prolonged exposure to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chronic anxiety and intense psychological trauma ” .
Mr Melzer later warned Assange ’ s treatment in prison “ may soon end up costing his life ” .
Assange has been in custody since he was removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in April 2019 after his asylum status was withdrawn .

3.9k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
A group of doctors and psychologists has warned that Julian Assange is about to die due to the torture he is experiencing in prison.
The 117-strong group penned an open letter in The Lancet medical journal, warning that the WikiLeaks founder could be “effectively tortured to death in prison.” They urge the UK government to end “the psychological torture and medical neglect” of Assange.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Sky.com reports: Mr Assange is being held in Belmarsh prison ahead of a hearing on 24 February which could result in him being extradited to the US.
The 48-year-old faces 18 charges in the US, including conspiring to hack into a classified Pentagon computer.
The letter says: “Assange is in a dire state of health due to the effects of prolonged psychological torture in both the Ecuadorian embassy and Belmarsh prison, where he has been arbitrarily detained according to the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention.
“Should Assange die in a UK prison, as the UN special rapporteur on torture has warned, he will have effectively been tortured to death.
“The medical profession cannot afford to stand silently by, on the wrong side of torture and the wrong side of history, while such a travesty unfolds.”
The letter also sets out accusations of “politically motivated medical neglect” which it says “sets a dangerous precedent”.
It adds: “Politics cannot be allowed to interfere with the right to health and the practice of medicine.
“Our appeals are simple: we are calling upon governments to end the torture of Mr Assange and ensure his access to the best available healthcare, before it is too late.”
A copy of the letter has been sent to the UK government and the Australian minister for foreign affairs, Marise Payne.
The Doctors for Assange group has previously written to the home secretary and the Australian government to express concern for his welfare.
In a November 2019 letter, the group said it had “serious concerns” about his fitness to stand trial.
Last year, UN special rapporteur on torture Nils Melzer visited the WikiLeaks founder in Belmarsh and reported that he “showed all symptoms typical for prolonged exposure to psychological torture, including extreme stress, chronic anxiety and intense psychological trauma”.
Mr Melzer later warned Assange’s treatment in prison “may soon end up costing his life”.
Assange has been in custody since he was removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in April 2019 after his asylum status was withdrawn.


newspunch--2020-02-18--Google, Facebook & Other Tech Giants Met With WHO To Discuss Tackling The Spread Of Coronavirus ‘Fak

Google, Facebook & Other Tech Giants Met With WHO To Discuss Tackling The Spread Of Coronavirus ‘Fake News’

The World Health Organization hosted a secretive meeting at Facebook with around a dozen of the largest tech companies to discuss how to clamp down on misinformation about the coronavirus .
Google , Amazon and YouTube were among the big tech companies that attented the talks at Facebook ’ s Menlo Park campus .
The WHO has labelled the spread of ‘ fake news ’ about the coronavirus outbreak an “ infodemic ” .
The Mail Online reports : Social media companies including Twitter and Youtube have already been working to remove post about the virus that are proved to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( WHO ) has offered to work directly with the companies on fact checking in a bid to speed up the process .
Posts on the virus that needed to be removed have ranged from those calling it a fad disease or created by the government to claims it can be treated with oregano oil .
Companies at the meeting agreed to work with WHO on collaborative tools , better content and a call centre for people to call for advice , CNBC reported .
The ‘ shocking ’ rise in misinformation about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an ‘ infodemic ’ by Andy Pattison from the World Health Organization .
He said sites were ‘ awash ’ with misinformation and conspiracy theories but that big tech companies were stepping up to combat the problem .
The meeting was organised by WHO but was hosted by Facebook at its Menlo Park campus in California , a spokesperson for the social media company told CNBC .
According to a CNBC report Amazon , Twilio , Dropbox , Google , Verizon , Salesforce , Twitter , YouTube , Airbnb , Kinsa and Mapbox @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Lyft and Uber were invited but didn ’ t attend , according to the report .
WHO shared information with the companies about its response to the virus and attendees gave their own ideas to address the outbreak .
As well as fake news stories appearing on Google and Facebook , books and products claiming to cure the disease were showing on Amazon .
Other outlandish hoaxes doing the rounds on social media include the implication the US government has patented coronavirus .
Fact-checkers have found this to be completely untrue and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to stop such claims from spreading to avoid mass hysteria .

The World Health Organization hosted a secretive meeting at Facebook with around a dozen of the largest tech companies to discuss how to clamp down on misinformation about the coronavirus.
Google, Amazon and YouTube were among the big tech companies that attented the talks at Facebook’s Menlo Park campus.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
The WHO has labelled the spread of ‘fake news’ about the coronavirus outbreak an “infodemic”.
The Mail Online reports: Social media companies including Twitter and Youtube have already been working to remove post about the virus that are proved to be fake.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has offered to work directly with the companies on fact checking in a bid to speed up the process.
Posts on the virus that needed to be removed have ranged from those calling it a fad disease or created by the government to claims it can be treated with oregano oil.
Companies at the meeting agreed to work with WHO on collaborative tools, better content and a call centre for people to call for advice, CNBC reported.
The ‘shocking’ rise in misinformation about the 2019-nCov virus has been described as an ‘infodemic’ by Andy Pattison from the World Health Organization.
He said sites were ‘awash’ with misinformation and conspiracy theories but that big tech companies were stepping up to combat the problem.
The meeting was organised by WHO but was hosted by Facebook at its Menlo Park campus in California, a spokesperson for the social media company told CNBC.
According to a CNBC report Amazon, Twilio, Dropbox, Google, Verizon, Salesforce, Twitter, YouTube, Airbnb, Kinsa and Mapbox were all at the meeting.
Apple, Lyft and Uber were invited but didn’t attend, according to the report.
WHO shared information with the companies about its response to the virus and attendees gave their own ideas to address the outbreak.
As well as fake news stories appearing on Google and Facebook, books and products claiming to cure the disease were showing on Amazon.
Other outlandish hoaxes doing the rounds on social media include the implication the US government has patented coronavirus.
Fact-checkers have found this to be completely untrue and the Silicon Valley tech firms are battling to stop such claims from spreading to avoid mass hysteria.


newspunch--2020-02-18--Stacey Abrams Boasts Dems Can ‘Jerry-Rig System’ and ‘Go Around Constitution’ To Win 2020 Election

Former Georgia State House Minority Leader and gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams joined ‘ The View ’ on Monday and boasted that Democrats can “ jerry-rig the system and go around the Constitution ” to win the 2020 election .
Stacey Abrams is one of the Democrat Party establishment ’ s top picks to be their presidential nominee ’ s running mate .
Just like clockwork , the Oprah-endorsed Democrat showed up on The View to be promoted to the public and anointed by Whoopi Goldberg , Joy Behar , and the rest of the shrews .
Strangely , the segment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cut from the main show .
Luckily , the footage surfaced on social media and due to the vigilance of conservatives who are determined to keep a close eye on Democrat Party election shenanigans , it won ’ t be completely scrubbed from the internet .
MadWorld report : After an enthusiastic welcome , the hosts were eager to get Abrams involved in the 2020 election : “ Rumors are flying that a lot of presidential candidates want our next guest on their ticket as V.P.
, ” a beaming Whoopi began , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ holiday to that push .
“ Today is Presidents ’ Day and while you ’ re not running at the moment , at this very second you ’ re not running , a lot of people want to see you on that ticket first as vice president , ” she prompted Abrams .
Abrams didn ’ t disappoint her leftwing fans , saying it would be a “ disservice ” to not say yes as a woman of color .
But the hosts wanted more .
Whoopi touted , “ You also see @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to which Abrams gushed , “ Absolutely !
” Co-host Joy Behar followed that up by frantically trying to get Abrams ’ 2020 endorsement .
“ I don ’ t think you ’ ve endorsed a candidate yet , have you ?
Do you think you should ?
Would you like to ?
Would you like to do it here ?
” she begged .
After all the flattery , the hosts let Abrams explain at length her group ’ s work in fighting “ voter suppression.
” Abrams ranted about the importance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ immigrants .
She even warned illegal immigrants and criminals evading arrest that it was important they answer the census to gain political power : [ I ] f you want to make sure that the person knocking on your door isn ’ t I.C.E.
, answer the census online….People who are afraid that if you answer the census they ’ ll be able to find you because you have a warrant , you owe somebody money , whatever , if you have a light bill or a cell phone , they know how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ So answer the census so you can get your money and your political power because that ’ s how we decide congressional leaders , how we decide school board members , how we decide every level of political power .
Answer the census in 2020 , get your money and be counted .
That ’ s when co-host Sunny Hostin begged Abrams to teach us all about how the Electoral College is “ racist.
” It was so sugary and over the top .
Abrams went into a tirade about the slavery days @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out of the racist “ South.
” She also argued it was an antiquated racist system that we needed to get rid of , and that ’ s when Joy Behar complained she would have a hard time with Republicans in power .
Amazingly , Abrams calmly explained how the left could “ jerry-rig the system and go around the Constitution ” by using the popular vote because they “ didn ’ t have time ” to make a Constitutional amendment .
“ This question was edited out of the aired show but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it online , ” Newsbusters reports .
Americans immediately took to social media to blast Abrams .
“ They are working on it with this compact between dem states where they give all their electoral votes to the candidate that wins the popular vote .
These people hate this country , ” tweeted Wayne Ennis .
“ [ W ] ait…what ?
?
The left just gets crazier and crazier , ” tweeted “ Impartial Observer.
” Stacey Abrams has a history of subverting elections in Georgia .
She also has a history @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We all remember back in 2018 when Oprah Winfrey was begging Georgia voters to put Abrams in the governor ’ s mansion .
All Winfrey saw was Abrams as an African-American woman , and that was enough to endorse and beg Georgians to vote for her .
Abrams owed back-taxes and was also found to be guilty of a huge voter fraud scheme , but Oprah let that go in favor of playing the race card in hopes her celebrity would be enough to sway voters to elect an African-American Democrat .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ love seeing Stacey Abrams on the Democrat ticket .
The fraudster against reigning Veep Mike Pence would make it easy to debate .
And lastly , it ’ s no wonder The View cut this segment from their final show .
Don ’ t worry .
If Abrams becomes the Democrat VP nominee , her radical leftwing remarks won ’ t be forgotten by the Trump campaign .

256k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Former Georgia State House Minority Leader and gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams joined ABC’s ‘The View’ on Monday and suggested that lawmakers should “jerry-rig the system and go around the Constitution” to bring in a popular vote system.
Stacey Abrams is one of the Democrat Party establishment’s top picks to be their presidential nominee’s running mate. Just like clockwork, the Oprah-endorsed Democrat showed up on The View to be promoted to the public and anointed by Whoopi Goldberg, Joy Behar, and the rest of the shrews.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
.@staceyabrams explains why she says the electoral college is a "classist racist system whose time has passed and we need to get rid of it." https://t.co/iSpno6xps6 pic.twitter.com/3FADf0IM3A — The View (@TheView) February 17, 2020
MadWorld report: After an enthusiastic welcome, the hosts were eager to get Abrams involved in the 2020 election: “Rumors are flying that a lot of presidential candidates want our next guest on their ticket as V.P.,” a beaming Whoopi began, before tying in today’s national holiday to that push.
“Today is Presidents’ Day and while you’re not running at the moment, at this very second you’re not running, a lot of people want to see you on that ticket first as vice president,” she prompted Abrams.
Abrams didn’t disappoint her leftwing fans, saying it would be a “disservice” to not say yes as a woman of color. But the hosts wanted more. Whoopi touted, “You also see yourself running as president too?” to which Abrams gushed, “Absolutely!”
Co-host Joy Behar followed that up by frantically trying to get Abrams’ 2020 endorsement. “I don’t think you’ve endorsed a candidate yet, have you? Do you think you should? Would you like to? Would you like to do it here?” she begged.
After all the flattery, the hosts let Abrams explain at length her group’s work in fighting “voter suppression.” Abrams ranted about the importance of the census for non-white citizens and immigrants. She even warned illegal immigrants and criminals evading arrest that it was important they answer the census to gain political power:
[I]f you want to make sure that the person knocking on your door isn’t I.C.E., answer the census online….People who are afraid that if you answer the census they’ll be able to find you because you have a warrant, you owe somebody money, whatever, if you have a light bill or a cell phone, they know how to find you [already]. So answer the census so you can get your money and your political power because that’s how we decide congressional leaders, how we decide school board members, how we decide every level of political power. Answer the census in 2020, get your money and be counted.
That’s when co-host Sunny Hostin begged Abrams to teach us all about how the Electoral College is “racist.” It was so sugary and over the top. Abrams went into a tirade about the slavery days and claimed the Electoral College was born out of the racist “South.”
She also argued it was an antiquated racist system that we needed to get rid of, and that’s when Joy Behar complained she would have a hard time with Republicans in power.
Amazingly, Abrams calmly explained how lawmakers could “jerry-rig the system and go around the Constitution” by using the popular vote because they “didn’t have time” to make a Constitutional amendment.
“This question was edited out of the aired show but The View’s Twitter account promoted it online,” Newsbusters reports.
Update: An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated that Abrams intended to secure a Democratic 2020 victory by moving to a national popular vote system. Her desire to change to the popular vote system has nothing to do with the 2020 election or the Democratic Party. The headline has been updated to reflect this.


newspunch--2020-02-18--Virginia Gov. Northam’s Bill To BAN Assault Weapons REJECTED By Lawmakers

Virginia ’ s Democrat Gov .
Ralph Northam has failed in his controversial plan to ban the sale of assault weapons on Monday after lawmakers voted to shelve the bill for at least one year .
Four Democrats , most moderates , joined their Republican counterparts in rejecting Gov .
Northam ’ s unconstitutional legislation , which would have banned the sale of some semiautomatic firearms , including AR-15-style rifles .
It would also have banned the possession of magazines that hold over 12 rounds .
DailyMail report : The Democrats included Virginia Senators R. Creigh Deeds , John S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Committee , Chap Petersen and Scott A. Surovell .
The committee vote drew praise from gun advocates , but is a big blow to Gov .
Northam , who was fighting for a number of gun control measures .
A spokesperson for the governor said he ’ s disappointed by the outcome , but plans to continue the fight next year .
Gun control was a key issue for Democrats during last year ’ s legislative elections when they gained control of the General Assembly for the first time in over two decades @ @ @ @ @ @ @ debate in the state , with gun owners , especially in rural communities making their voices heard .
Last month tens of thousands of gun-rights activists–some in tactical gear–from around the country descended on the Capitol in Richmond and the surrounding area to protest .
More than 100 counties , cities and towns have also declared themselves as Second Amendment sanctuaries , promising to oppose any ‘ unconstitutional restrictions ’ on guns .
In Virginia gun owners argued the governor was trying to seize commonly-owned guns and accessories from law abiding citizens .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the purpose of the bill and that banning the sale of assault weapons and high-capacity magazines would help prevent mass murders .
While earlier proposals to ban the possession of assault riles or require owners to register have failed , the governor was hoping this bill would win enough Democratic votes to pass .
However moderate Democrats in Virginia ’ s Senate said they were uncomfortable with the legislation .
Lawmakers said it wasn ’ t clear what types of guns would constitute an assault weapon .
Senators have now asked the state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ While this bill was tabled , lawmakers in the House and Senate have advanced other measures that are expected to be passed in the coming days , including bills that would require universal background checks on gun purchases and enable localities to ban guns in public buildings , parks and other areas .
Other bills would limit handgun purchases to once a month and allow authorities to temporarily take guns away from anyone deemed to be a danger to themselves or others .

1.8k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Virginia’s Democrat Gov. Ralph Northam has failed in his controversial plan to ban the sale of assault weapons on Monday after lawmakers voted to shelve the bill for at least one year.
Four Democrats, most moderates, joined their Republican counterparts in rejecting Gov. Northam’s unconstitutional legislation, which would have banned the sale of some semiautomatic firearms, including AR-15-style rifles.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
It would also have banned the possession of magazines that hold over 12 rounds.
DailyMail report: The Democrats included Virginia Senators R. Creigh Deeds, John S. Edwards, chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Chap Petersen and Scott A. Surovell.
The committee vote drew praise from gun advocates, but is a big blow to Gov. Northam, who was fighting for a number of gun control measures.
A spokesperson for the governor said he’s disappointed by the outcome, but plans to continue the fight next year.
Gun control was a key issue for Democrats during last year’s legislative elections when they gained control of the General Assembly for the first time in over two decades.
The issue continues to draw heated debate in the state, with gun owners, especially in rural communities making their voices heard.
Last month tens of thousands of gun-rights activists–some in tactical gear–from around the country descended on the Capitol in Richmond and the surrounding area to protest.
More than 100 counties, cities and towns have also declared themselves as Second Amendment sanctuaries, promising to oppose any ‘unconstitutional restrictions’ on guns.
In Virginia gun owners argued the governor was trying to seize commonly-owned guns and accessories from law abiding citizens.
The governor said that wasn’t the purpose of the bill and that banning the sale of assault weapons and high-capacity magazines would help prevent mass murders.
While earlier proposals to ban the possession of assault riles or require owners to register have failed, the governor was hoping this bill would win enough Democratic votes to pass.
However moderate Democrats in Virginia’s Senate said they were uncomfortable with the legislation.
Lawmakers said it wasn’t clear what types of guns would constitute an assault weapon.
Senators have now asked the state crime commission to study the issue.
While this bill was tabled, lawmakers in the House and Senate have advanced other measures that are expected to be passed in the coming days, including bills that would require universal background checks on gun purchases and enable localities to ban guns in public buildings, parks and other areas.
Other bills would limit handgun purchases to once a month and allow authorities to temporarily take guns away from anyone deemed to be a danger to themselves or others.


newspunch--2020-02-18--It’s 2020 and Barack Obama Is STILL Trying To Take Full Credit For Trump’s Economic Boom

Former President Barack Obama spent 8 years destroying the US economy , leaving it in a terrible state , and upon leaving office mocked President Trump by saying “ Those jobs are never coming back .
What ’ s he going to do , wave a magic wand ?
“ President Trump immediately set about working to restore America to its former greatness , reversing every failed Obama-era economic policy , and with it , reversing the limp Obama economy .
However that didn ’ t stop Barack Obama waking up on Presidents Day and shamelessly attempting to take full @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
According to Barack , he is the one responsible for the current booming economy .
Talk about rich !
At the end of the day , stone cold facts show that the failed policies of the Obama administration stubbornly refused to work as well for the American people as those of the Trump administration .
It ’ s just the way it is .
Here ’ s part of the official response , via Fox News : “ President Trump reversed every single failed Obama-era economic policy , and with it , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump campaign national press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said .
“ Obama and Biden orchestrated the worst economic recovery in modern history.
” She added : “ By contrast , though , deregulating , lowering taxes , and supporting free-market policies , President Trump has created the hottest economy on record , with unemployment hitting generational lows and all-time lows for African Americans , Hispanics , the disabled , veterans and many other hard-working Americans.
” You didn ’ t think POTUS would miss out on this one , did you ?
His tweets…

15.3k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Former President Barack Obama spent 8 years mismanaging the US economy, leaving it in a terrible state, and upon leaving office mocked President Trump by saying “Those jobs are never coming back. What’s he going to do, wave a magic wand?“
President Trump immediately set about working to restore America to its former greatness, reversing every failed Obama-era economic policy, and with it, supercharging the limp Obama economy.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
When Trump entered the Oval Office in January 2017 the unemployment rate was 4.7% — the highest and worst in US history. Gee, thanks Obama. By May 2019 it was down to 3.6%.
But that didn’t stop Barack Obama waking up on Presidents Day and patting himself on the back while shamelessly attempting to take full credit for Trump’s economic recovery.
According to Barack, he is the one responsible for the current booming economy. Talk about rich!
Eleven years ago today, near the bottom of the worst recession in generations, I signed the Recovery Act, paving the way for more than a decade of economic growth and the longest streak of job creation in American history. pic.twitter.com/BmdXrxUAUf — Barack Obama (@BarackObama) February 17, 2020
At the end of the day, stone cold facts show that the failed policies of the Obama administration stubbornly refused to work as well for the American people as those of the Trump administration. It’s just the way it is.
Here’s part of the official response, via Fox News:
“President Trump reversed every single failed Obama-era economic policy, and with it, reversed the floundering Obama/Biden economy,” Trump campaign national press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said. “Obama and Biden orchestrated the worst economic recovery in modern history.” She added: “By contrast, though, deregulating, lowering taxes, and supporting free-market policies, President Trump has created the hottest economy on record, with unemployment hitting generational lows and all-time lows for African Americans, Hispanics, the disabled, veterans and many other hard-working Americans.”
You didn’t think POTUS would miss out on this one, did you? His tweets…
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1229551220248936451?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1229551220248936451&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fflagandcross.com%2Fbarack-obama-woke-up-on-monday-took-full-credit-for-the-booming-trump-economy%2F


newspunch--2020-02-18--Joe Biden, Who Had Ukrainian Prosecutor Investigating His Son Fired, Now Says Barr Must Resign

Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden “ absolutely ” joined calls for Attorney General William Barr to resign during an appearance on Monday ’ s broadcast of MSNBC ’ s “ Deadline White House.
” Wait , what ?
!
Quid Pro Joe wants to remove another prosecutor looking into the corruption of him and his son ?
Deja vu anyone ?
Why doesn ’ t Biden just threaten him like he did the Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin in 2016 ?
MSNBC Host Nicolle Wallace asked , “ So , we have been talking about the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Justice Department officials of both political parties calling on Attorney General Barr to resign .
Do you join their calls for his resignation ?
” Biden responded , “ Absolutely , positively .
This has been the most — the greatest abuse of power I have ever seen at the hands of this president who has no , no sense of decency or understanding of the Constitution .
And Barr ’ s facilitating it is beyond my comprehension .
I ’ ve been around a long time , used to chair the Judiciary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no president , no president has ever intimidated an attorney general into abusing power as much as this man has .
It ’ s disgusting .
”

3.5k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden “absolutely” joined calls for Attorney General William Barr to resign during an appearance on Monday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s “Deadline White House.”
Wait, what?! Quid Pro Joe wants to remove another prosecutor looking into the corruption of him and his son?
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Deja vu anyone? Why doesn’t Biden just threaten him like he did the Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin in 2016?
MSNBC Host Nicolle Wallace asked, “So, we have been talking about the letter signed by more than 2,000 former Justice Department officials of both political parties calling on Attorney General Barr to resign. Do you join their calls for his resignation?”
Biden responded, “Absolutely, positively. This has been the most — the greatest abuse of power I have ever seen at the hands of this president who has no, no sense of decency or understanding of the Constitution. And Barr’s facilitating it is beyond my comprehension. I’ve been around a long time, used to chair the Judiciary Committee for years. No president, no president, no president has ever intimidated an attorney general into abusing power as much as this man has. It’s disgusting.”


newspunch--2020-02-19--Bernie Sanders Calls Saudi Arabia’s Leaders ‘Murderous Thugs’

US Senator Bernie Sanders has blasted Saudi Arabia ’ s leadership calling the country ’ s rulers “ murderous thugs.
@ @ @ @ @ we have loved Saudi Arabia – our wonderful ally ; the only problem is the @ @ @ @ @ are murderous thugs , ” Sanders said during a town hall meeting , according to @ @ @ @ @ leading Democratic presidential candidate , also reaffirmed his promise to pursue a more even-handed foreign @ @ @ @ @ .
Press TV reports : The Vermont senator described Saudi Arabia ’ s Crown Prince @ @ @ @ @ “ billionaire dictator.
” The senator also reiterated his stance that the United States should @ @ @ @ @ Palestinians and blasted the “ right-wing racist government that currently exists in Israel.
” He @ @ @ @ @ crisis in the Gaza Strip .
Sanders made similar remarks during a presidential debate in @ @ @ @ @ Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a “ racist ” and said US foreign policy can @ @ @ @ @ but must be “ pro-Palestinian ” as well .

US Senator Bernie Sanders has blasted Saudi Arabia’s leadership calling the country’s rulers “murderous thugs.”
“For years, we have loved Saudi Arabia – our wonderful ally; the only problem is the people who run that country are murderous thugs,” Sanders said during a town hall meeting, according to Middle East Eye.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
The leading Democratic presidential candidate, also reaffirmed his promise to pursue a more even-handed foreign policy in the Middle East.
Press TV reports: The Vermont senator described Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman as a “billionaire dictator.”
The senator also reiterated his stance that the United States should not ignore the needs of Palestinians and blasted the “right-wing racist government that currently exists in Israel.”
He also pointed to the humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip.
Sanders made similar remarks during a presidential debate in December, when he called Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a “racist” and said US foreign policy cannot be only pro-Israel, but must be “pro-Palestinian” as well.


newspunch--2020-02-19--Soros Yet Again Demands Zuckerberg’s Removal From Facebook Accusing Him Of Helping Trump Re-election

Billionaire globalist George Soros has once again demanded the removal of the Facebook leadership , accusing them of collusion with US President Donald Trump .
Soros accused Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg , of “ obfuscating the facts ” after he argued for greater regulation of the internet last Saturday .
In a letter to Financial Times , Soros said : “ It goes without saying that I support government regulation of social media platforms ” He added that Zuckerberg doesn ’ t need it to stop accepting all political advertising until after the November 2020 US election .
RT reports @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the Paris-based oligarch wrote , accusing Zuckerberg of being “ engaged in some kind of mutual assistance arrangement with Donald Trump that will help him to get re-elected ” and repeating his demand for him and his COO Sheryl Sandberg to be “ removed from control of Facebook.
” Soros ’ s angry missive was a response to Zuckerberg ’ s op-ed published the day before , in which the hapless head of the Menlo Park behemoth pleaded for some kind of government regulation that would establish clear lines on matters that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such as “ elections ” and “ harmful content , ” among others .
“ I believe clearer rules would be better for everyone , ” Zuckerberg wrote , apparently irritated by the stream of ever-shifting objections from parties and individuals who blame Facebook for losing elections and referenda they believed were rightfully theirs to win – the 2016 US presidential contest and Brexit , to name but two .
One of the most outspoken critics of Facebook has been Soros , the grey eminence of global ‘ liberal ’ causes , who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the World Economic Forum in Davos last month .
He followed that with a blistering New York Times op-ed at the end of January , demanding the exit of Zuckerberg and Sandberg “ one way or another.
” Facebook ’ s rejection of Soros ’ s assertions as “ just plain wrong ” and unsubstantiated by evidence has obviously not deterred the ‘ Open Society ’ magnate from stating them again , and again , as evidenced by the op-eds and letters that keep coming .
Once celebrated by Democrats in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – for helping Barack Obama get elected , Facebook ended up in the doghouse after the 2016 election .
Soros famously denounced it and other social media as a “ menace ” to society whose “ days are numbered , ” in a January 2018 speech in Davos .
Facebook responded by paying a PR firm to investigate Soros , something Sandberg admitted to in November 2018 – which may explain his ongoing vendetta against her .

1.7k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Billionaire globalist George Soros has once again demanded the removal of the Facebook leadership, accusing them of collusion with US President Donald Trump.
Soros accused Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, of “obfuscating the facts” after he argued for greater regulation of the internet last Saturday.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
In a letter to Financial Times, Soros said: “It goes without saying that I support government regulation of social media platforms”
He added that Zuckerberg doesn’t need it to stop accepting all political advertising until after the November 2020 US election.
RT reports: Facebook is unlikely to do so, the Paris-based oligarch wrote, accusing Zuckerberg of being “engaged in some kind of mutual assistance arrangement with Donald Trump that will help him to get re-elected” and repeating his demand for him and his COO Sheryl Sandberg to be “removed from control of Facebook.”
Mark Zuckerberg: Big Tech needs more regulation https://t.co/CyKwF97Cte — Financial Times (@FT) February 16, 2020
Soros’s angry missive was a response to Zuckerberg’s op-ed published the day before, in which the hapless head of the Menlo Park behemoth pleaded for some kind of government regulation that would establish clear lines on matters that “touch on fundamental democratic values” such as “elections” and “harmful content,” among others.
“I believe clearer rules would be better for everyone,” Zuckerberg wrote, apparently irritated by the stream of ever-shifting objections from parties and individuals who blame Facebook for losing elections and referenda they believed were rightfully theirs to win – the 2016 US presidential contest and Brexit, to name but two.
One of the most outspoken critics of Facebook has been Soros, the grey eminence of global ‘liberal’ causes, who first accused Zuckerberg of collusion with Trump at the World Economic Forum in Davos last month. He followed that with a blistering New York Times op-ed at the end of January, demanding the exit of Zuckerberg and Sandberg “one way or another.”
Facebook’s rejection of Soros’s assertions as “just plain wrong” and unsubstantiated by evidence has obviously not deterred the ‘Open Society’ magnate from stating them again, and again, as evidenced by the op-eds and letters that keep coming.
Once celebrated by Democrats in the US – whom Soros is lavishly funding – for helping Barack Obama get elected, Facebook ended up in the doghouse after the 2016 election. Soros famously denounced it and other social media as a “menace” to society whose “days are numbered,” in a January 2018 speech in Davos.
Facebook responded by paying a PR firm to investigate Soros, something Sandberg admitted to in November 2018 – which may explain his ongoing vendetta against her.


newspunch--2020-02-19--Illegal Acquitted for Kate Steinle Murder Deemed Mentally Ill By California Court, Won’t Stand Trial

Illegal Acquitted for Kate Steinle Murder Deemed Mentally Ill By California Court, Won’t Stand Trial on Gun Charges

The illegal alien acquitted for Kate Steinle ’ s murder in 2017 has been deemed “ mentally ill ” by a California court and thus will not stand trial on federal gun charges .
Five-time deportee , seven-time convicted felon Jose Garcia Zarate was charged with Steinle ’ s murder after being caught on surveillance footage fleeing the scene after her slaying on a pier in San Francisco in 2015 .
Following his arrest , Zarate admitted to shooting and killing Steinle , who was on the pier at the time with her father , and admitted he chose San @ @ @ @ @ @ @ city ” that protects criminal illegal immigrants from arrest and deportation by federal immigration officials .
Despite his acquittal in the murder case , Zarate is still facing federal criminal charges for illegal possession of a firearm .
Zarate has pleaded not guilty to the charges .
However , in a stunning development , records from last week reveal that a California court is declaring Zarate “ mentally ill ” and thus unable to stand trial for the charges , as FOX 5 San Diego reported : A court evaluator concluded Jose Ines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trial on federal gun charges “ because of a mental illness that is not presently being treated , ” according to a court document from the US District Court in California .
[ Emphasis added ] “ If neither side disputes the evaluator ’ s conclusion , the Court wishes to explore … what efforts should be made locally to restore the defendant to competency through proper medication , as opposed to sending the defendant to a federal facility outside California , ” according to court documents dated February 14 .
[ Emphasis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and prosecution are set to meet this week to discuss the matter .
Illegal aliens facing trial , as Breitbart News has chronicled , increasingly have used the defense of being insane , mentally ill , and mentally disabled to escape maximum sentences for murder .
In the case of illegal alien Wilbur Ernesto Martinez-Guzman — accused of murdering four Americans in Reno , Nevada — the defense is expected to claim that Martinez-Guzman is “ mentally disabled ” to avoid the death penalty if he is convicted .
Likewise , the 34-year-old @ @ @ @ @ @ @ self-proclaimed member of the Sinaloa Cartel , accused of murdering 21-year-old gas station clerk Grant Ronnenbeck in cold blood in January 2015 , will not be eligible for the death penalty after he successfully got himself declared “ intellectually disabled .
”

1.1k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
The illegal alien acquitted for Kate Steinle’s murder in 2017 has been deemed “mentally ill” by a California court and thus will not stand trial on federal gun charges.
Five-time deportee, seven-time convicted felon Jose Garcia Zarate was charged with Steinle’s murder after being caught on surveillance footage fleeing the scene after her slaying on a pier in San Francisco in 2015.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Following his arrest, Zarate admitted to shooting and killing Steinle, who was on the pier at the time with her father, and admitted he chose San Francisco because it is a “sanctuary city” that protects criminal illegal immigrants from arrest and deportation by federal immigration officials.
Despite his acquittal in the murder case, Zarate is still facing federal criminal charges for illegal possession of a firearm. Zarate has pleaded not guilty to the charges.
However, in a stunning development, records from last week reveal that a California court is declaring Zarate “mentally ill” and thus unable to stand trial for the charges, as FOX 5 San Diego reported:
A court evaluator concluded Jose Ines Garcia Zarate is not competent to stand trial on federal gun charges “because of a mental illness that is not presently being treated,” according to a court document from the US District Court in California. [Emphasis added] … “If neither side disputes the evaluator’s conclusion, the Court wishes to explore … what efforts should be made locally to restore the defendant to competency through proper medication, as opposed to sending the defendant to a federal facility outside California,” according to court documents dated February 14. [Emphasis added]
Breitbart report: The defense and prosecution are set to meet this week to discuss the matter.
Illegal aliens facing trial, as Breitbart News has chronicled, increasingly have used the defense of being insane, mentally ill, and mentally disabled to escape maximum sentences for murder.
In the case of illegal alien Wilbur Ernesto Martinez-Guzman — accused of murdering four Americans in Reno, Nevada — the defense is expected to claim that Martinez-Guzman is “mentally disabled” to avoid the death penalty if he is convicted.
Likewise, the 34-year-old illegal alien Apolinar Altamirano, an alleged self-proclaimed member of the Sinaloa Cartel, accused of murdering 21-year-old gas station clerk Grant Ronnenbeck in cold blood in January 2015, will not be eligible for the death penalty after he successfully got himself declared “intellectually disabled.”


newspunch--2020-02-19--Mad Maxine: Average Americans ‘Where Are You? ‘I Don’t Hear Enough Voices’ Resisting Trump

Rep. Maxine Waters ( D-CA ) appeared on MSNBC Tuesday and admitted that “ average American ” voters are not “ resisting Trump ” and “ speaking out ” against him .
Rep.
Waters ’ fears that if her crtitique of the electoral landscape proves correct , President Trump will be elected in a landslide in November , turning blue states red and destroying years of Democrat planning .
Perhaps it ’ s time for Democrat party stalwarts like Mad Maxine to understand that the “ average Americans ” and patriots she is speaking about deserted the Democrat Party in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Waters said , “ The American people should be focused on Barr .
We should be joining with all of those federal prosecuting attorneys that have decided he should step down , that he should resign .
We should be supporting them and backing them up .
I ’ m anxious to see what the federal judges who have decided they can ’ t wait until the yearly association meeting , that they should pay attention to what is going on now and review what has happened .
I ’ m anxious to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ come out with.
” She continued , “ But the American public should get behind this if they care anything about our democracy .
You know , for all of those people who say that they , you know , honor the flag and that they are in support of our democracy being strengthened , for all of those people who say that—where are you ?
Can ’ t they see what is happening ?
We ’ re in a constitutional crisis in this country , with a president who is running amok @ @ @ @ @ @ @ We have got to make sure that he ’ s not reelected .
We have to speak up , we have to resist .
I don ’ t hear enough voices.
” She added , “ It is not only the sycophants around him , it ’ s the average American who gets up every day , who is taking care of their families , who is thinking somebody else will see to it that this president is not re-elected .
But , no , it has to be all of us out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ We have a constitutional crisis and we ’ ve got to deal with it .
This is what democracy is all about , when you see a president out of control , when you see those who have been elected to office , who are not acting responsibly and they ’ re endangering our democracy , you have to speak out against them .
You have to work against them .
You have got to make sure that they ’ re not reelected ever again .
”

2.4k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) appeared on MSNBC Tuesday and admitted that “average American” voters are not “resisting Trump” and “speaking out” against him.
Rep. Waters’ fears that if her crtitique of the electoral landscape proves correct, President Trump will be elected in a landslide in November, turning blue states red and destroying years of Democrat planning.
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Perhaps it’s time for Democrat party stalwarts like Mad Maxine to understand that the “average Americans” and patriots she is speaking about deserted the Democrat Party in droves in recent decades.
Rep. Waters said, “The American people should be focused on Barr. We should be joining with all of those federal prosecuting attorneys that have decided he should step down, that he should resign. We should be supporting them and backing them up. I’m anxious to see what the federal judges who have decided they can’t wait until the yearly association meeting, that they should pay attention to what is going on now and review what has happened. I’m anxious to see what they’re going to come out with.”
She continued, “But the American public should get behind this if they care anything about our democracy. You know, for all of those people who say that they, you know, honor the flag and that they are in support of our democracy being strengthened, for all of those people who say that—where are you? Can’t they see what is happening? We’re in a constitutional crisis in this country, with a president who is running amok. He is out of control. We have got to make sure that he’s not reelected. We have to speak up, we have to resist. I don’t hear enough voices.”
She added, “It is not only the sycophants around him, it’s the average American who gets up every day, who is taking care of their families, who is thinking somebody else will see to it that this president is not re-elected. But, no, it has to be all of us out there working and working very hard. We have a constitutional crisis and we’ve got to deal with it. This is what democracy is all about, when you see a president out of control, when you see those who have been elected to office, who are not acting responsibly and they’re endangering our democracy, you have to speak out against them. You have to work against them. You have got to make sure that they’re not reelected ever again.”


newspunch--2020-02-19--Unlimited Immigration! Biden Says It’s ‘Bizarre’ To Suggest US Has Limited Capacity For Migrants

Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden says it is “ absolutely bizarre ” to suggest a limit on immigration to the U.S. Campaigning inside a Chinese restaurant in Las Vegas on Tuesday , the former Vice President said “ Folks , look — the idea that there ’ s some limitation on the capacity of anyone who — on the immigrants in this country is absolutely bizarre !
It ’ s absolutely bizarre.
” Biden has promised to dramatically expand immigration to America if elected president .
Breitbart report : Biden , speaking to a packed crowd inside the Harbor Palace @ @ @ @ @ @ @ next Democratic debate , addressed members of the Asian-American and Pacific Islander ( AAPI ) community , urging them to turn out the vote ahead of Saturday ’ s caucuses .
Last month , the AAPI Victory Fund super PAC endorsed Biden for president , citing his ability to defeat President Donald Trump and his experience working with immigrant communities from South Asia , East Asia and the Pacific generally .
Though the AAPI immigrant community is politically diverse , it has trended Democratic in recent years .
Last year , Breitbart News @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Las Vegas expressed opposition to President Trump ’ s proposed merit-based system for legal immigration .
On Tuesday , Biden promised , if elected , to allow family reunification visas .
“ We should be able to increase , to three million people , the people who could come for family reunification .
Period , period , period , period.
” He called the idea that the U.S. could not “ reunite ” more families “ absolutely bizarre.
” Biden also reminded his audience that Latinos were not the only beneficiaries of President @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Childhood Arrivals ( DACA ) program , which applied to those brought to the country illegally as children .
He said there were “ thousands and thousands of AAPI ‘ Dreamers ‘ ” who had benefited from DACA as well .
Afterwards , Biden greeted attendees , some of whom proceeded to the Chinatown Mall to cast early votes before the polling place there closed .
Biden hopes to finish in the top three in Nevada , and to win South Carolina on Feb. 29 , to make the case that he is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s nomination .
Sen. Bernie Sanders ( I-VT ) now leads national polls , as well as Nevada polls .

1.4k SHARES LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden says it is “absolutely bizarre” to suggest a limit on immigration to the U.S.
Campaigning inside a Chinese restaurant in Las Vegas on Tuesday, the former Vice President said “Folks, look — the idea that there’s some limitation on the capacity of anyone who — on the immigrants in this country is absolutely bizarre! It’s absolutely bizarre.”
BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. Email *
Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ
Biden has promised to dramatically expand immigration to America if elected president.
Breitbart report: Biden, speaking to a packed crowd inside the Harbor Palace Seafood Restaurant on the eve of the next Democratic debate, addressed members of the Asian-American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) community, urging them to turn out the vote ahead of Saturday’s caucuses.
Last month, the AAPI Victory Fund super PAC endorsed Biden for president, citing his ability to defeat President Donald Trump and his experience working with immigrant communities from South Asia, East Asia and the Pacific generally.
Though the AAPI immigrant community is politically diverse, it has trended Democratic in recent years.
Last year, Breitbart News reported, another local AAPI organization in Las Vegas expressed opposition to President Trump’s proposed merit-based system for legal immigration.
On Tuesday, Biden promised, if elected, to allow family reunification visas.
“We should be able to increase, to three million people, the people who could come for family reunification. Period, period, period, period.”
He called the idea that the U.S. could not “reunite” more families “absolutely bizarre.”
Biden also reminded his audience that Latinos were not the only beneficiaries of President Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which applied to those brought to the country illegally as children.
He said there were “thousands and thousands of AAPI ‘Dreamers‘” who had benefited from DACA as well.
Afterwards, Biden greeted attendees, some of whom proceeded to the Chinatown Mall to cast early votes before the polling place there closed.
Biden hopes to finish in the top three in Nevada, and to win South Carolina on Feb. 29, to make the case that he is still a top contender for his party’s nomination. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) now leads national polls, as well as Nevada polls.