bipartisanreport--2020-01-26--Schiff Check-Mates Trump With Sunday Video Evidence Declaration

Americans want to hear the witnesses in the Donald Trump impeachment trial .
Voters are not stupid , although one state senator admitted off of the record , a majority of politicians believe people are not smart at best and apathetic at worst .
That may be the fatal flaw in the 2020 presidential election .
People compared House Intelligence Committee and impeachment trial lead Adam Schiff ’ s ( D-CA ) argument in the Senate impeachment trial to an electrifying performance of Gregory Peck .
They were referring to Peck ’ s role as Atticus Finch , the fictional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ironically , Schiff told the Senate that he called on that very character and the heroic Senate John McCain ( R-AZ ) for inspiration .
Even though he has had death threats , Schiff continued .
He pointed at individual senators on both sides of the Senate and repeated each time , according to the Associated Press ( AP ) .
‘ The next time , it just may be you .
Do you think for a moment that if he felt it was in his interest , he wouldn ’ t ask @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Schiff sent out a tweet summarizing his argument .
He said Trump ’ s attorneys have been trying to “ Deprive Americans of a Fair Trial , ” and “ Americans know what a fair trial looks like : ” ‘ The President ’ s legal defense boils down to this : But Americans know what a fair trial looks like .
They know it requires witnesses and documents .
If Trump ’ s team succeeds in orchestrating a trial without them , There will be no exoneration .
pic.twitter.com/WEJkFMZBbo Twitter world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ responded to the heroic Democrat below : The Mueller Report Adventures : In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page .
These quick , two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people .
Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery .
Interestingly enough , Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order .

Americans want to hear the witnesses in the Donald Trump impeachment trial. Voters are not stupid, although one state senator admitted off of the record, a majority of politicians believe people are not smart at best and apathetic at worst. That may be the fatal flaw in the 2020 presidential election.
People compared House Intelligence Committee and impeachment trial lead Adam Schiff’s (D-CA) argument in the Senate impeachment trial to an electrifying performance of Gregory Peck. They were referring to Peck’s role as Atticus Finch, the fictional attorney in To Kill A Mockingbird.
Ironically, Schiff told the Senate that he called on that very character and the heroic Senate John McCain (R-AZ) for inspiration. Even though he has had death threats, Schiff continued. He pointed at individual senators on both sides of the Senate and repeated each time, according to the Associated Press (AP).
‘The next time, it just may be you. Do you think for a moment that if he felt it was in his interest, he wouldn’t ask you to be investigated?’
Then, Schiff sent out a tweet summarizing his argument. He said Trump’s attorneys have been trying to “Deprive Americans of a Fair Trial,” and “Americans know what a fair trial looks like:”
‘The President’s legal defense boils down to this: Deprive Americans of a fair trial. But Americans know what a fair trial looks like. They know it requires witnesses and documents. If Trump’s team succeeds in orchestrating a trial without them, There will be no exoneration. pic.twitter.com/WEJkFMZBbo — Adam Schiff (@RepAdamSchiff) January 26, 2020’
The President’s legal defense boils down to this: Deprive Americans of a fair trial. But Americans know what a fair trial looks like. They know it requires witnesses and documents. If Trump’s team succeeds in orchestrating a trial without them, There will be no exoneration. pic.twitter.com/WEJkFMZBbo — Adam Schiff (@RepAdamSchiff) January 26, 2020
Twitter world went wild. Check out how people responded to the heroic Democrat below:
Featured image Screenshot via YouTube.
The Mueller Report Adventures: In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page. These quick, two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people. Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery. Interestingly enough, Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order.


bipartisanreport--2020-01-26--Trump’s Flubbed Tweet About Kobe Bryant Goes Horribly Wrong

Donald Trump does not listen .
His whole world revolves in a short orbit between him and his TV sets .
Sort of like Uranus .
As usual , the president half-listened to the news , but his attention span cut off halfway through the tragic story about the great basketball player Kobe Bryant and his 13-year-old daughter , who were killed in a helicopter crash .
Some people gradually realize that POTUS has never cared about anyone but Donald J. Trump .
Even First Daughter Ivanka Trump has been less than a daughter than Trump ’ s sperm grown @ @ @ @ @ @ @ information about the great basketball player Kobe Bryant .
He said three were killed , not four .
At the same time , the commander-in-chief ignored the crisis in his own military .
There were no words of consolation for Bryant ’ s family , friends , or fans in his tweet : In case , the president ever got around to wondering about how Byrant felt about him , this was it .
Of course given his history , this walking 400 pounds of instant gratification never thought about it .
Bryant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mere name inspired “ dissension and hatred : ” The last victim in the crash was identified as baseball coach John Altobelli : Trump should have been paying attention to what was happening to the American embassy in Baghdad .
Rockets were raining down near the U.S. embassy in Iraq as POTUS tweeted away : In an update , the news about the rockets was dire .
The military news site tweeted again , saying that three of the five rocket were “ a direct hit ” on the Baghdad embassy : Twitter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ridiculous tweet .
Take a look at some of our favorite responses below and laugh : The Mueller Report Adventures : In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page .
These quick , two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people .
Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery .
Interestingly enough , Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order .

Donald Trump does not listen. His whole world revolves in a short orbit between him and his TV sets. Sort of like Uranus.
As usual, the president half-listened to the news, but his attention span cut off halfway through the tragic story about the great basketball player Kobe Bryant and his 13-year-old daughter, who were killed in a helicopter crash.
Some people gradually realize that POTUS has never cared about anyone but Donald J. Trump. Even First Daughter Ivanka Trump has been less than a daughter than Trump’s sperm grown tall.
Trump tweeted out the wrong information about the great basketball player Kobe Bryant. He said three were killed, not four. At the same time, the commander-in-chief ignored the crisis in his own military. There were no words of consolation for Bryant’s family, friends, or fans in his tweet:
‘Reports are that basketball great Kobe Bryant and three others have been killed in a helicopter crash in California. That is terrible news!’
In case, the president ever got around to wondering about how Byrant felt about him, this was it. Of course given his history, this walking 400 pounds of instant gratification never thought about it. Bryant tweeted in September 2017 that POTUS’ mere name inspired “dissension and hatred:”
‘A #POTUS whose name alone creates division and anger. Whose words inspire dissension and hatred can’t possibly “Make America Great Again”‘
The last victim in the crash was identified as baseball coach John Altobelli:
‘My longtime friend John Altobelli, baseball coach @occ_baseball, killed in the copter crash along with Kobe Bryant. Love you Alto.’
Trump should have been paying attention to what was happening to the American embassy in Baghdad. Rockets were raining down near the U.S. embassy in Iraq as POTUS tweeted away:
‘#BREAKING Five rockets hit near US embassy in Iraq capital: security source’
In an update, the news about the rockets was dire. The military news site tweeted again, saying that three of the five rocket were “a direct hit” on the Baghdad embassy:
‘#BREAKING Of five rockets fired, three made a direct hit on the US embassy in Baghdad, according to a security source’
Twitter world went nuts over Trump’s ridiculous tweet. Take a look at some of our favorite responses below and laugh:
The Mueller Report Adventures: In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page. These quick, two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people. Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery. Interestingly enough, Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order.


bipartisanreport--2020-01-26--Fox News Viewers Turn Dramatically Against Donald Trump

The senators sat naked of their phones through almost all of the Democrats ’ allotted 24 hours , but they passive-aggressively rebelled .
The stood up and walked around .
There was one a paper airplane , and plenty of disrespect .
Their voters cared , though .
Even the latest Fox News audience wanted the senators to convict and remove Donald Trump from office by a 50 to 44 percent margin , according to the Fox poll .
The numbers for the Democrats were even higher .
Eight-one percent wanted him removed .
For the independents , they said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ percent .
President Bill Clinton was on trial for his impeachment exactly 20 years ago , January 1999 .
Just 38 percent of voters wanted the Senate to take him out of office .
A full 65 percent believed that Clinton was doing a good job in his role as president .
This week , a razor-thin margin of voters , 48 percent to 44 percent , believed that the senators needed the witnesses to testify in order to make their decision on Trump ’ s impeachment .
When asked about how the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s voters gave him a score of 56 percent .
When factored into all the questions about the economy , the poll indicated he was underwater .
Conversely , a full 50 percent of these voters wanted him out of office .
Factors that entered into the viewers ’ minds were the president ’ s character and health care , which mattered more than his economy numbers .
They remembered the 2018 major failure when POTUS tried to run on the economy .
They lost the House with embarrassingly high numbers .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ invalidate the 2016 presidential choice and send Trump “ on a permanent golf vacation at his own expense.
” The Mueller Report Adventures : In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page .
These quick , two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people .
Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery .
Interestingly enough , Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order .

The senators sat naked of their phones through almost all of the Democrats’ allotted 24 hours, but they passive-aggressively rebelled. The stood up and walked around. There was one a paper airplane, and plenty of disrespect. Their voters cared, though.
Even the latest Fox News audience wanted the senators to convict and remove Donald Trump from office by a 50 to 44 percent margin, according to the Fox poll. The numbers for the Democrats were even higher. Eight-one percent wanted him removed. For the independents, they said they wanted POTUS removed 53 to 34 percent.
President Bill Clinton was on trial for his impeachment exactly 20 years ago, January 1999. Just 38 percent of voters wanted the Senate to take him out of office. A full 65 percent believed that Clinton was doing a good job in his role as president.
This week, a razor-thin margin of voters, 48 percent to 44 percent, believed that the senators needed the witnesses to testify in order to make their decision on Trump’s impeachment.
When asked about how the president was handling the economy, Fox’s voters gave him a score of 56 percent. When factored into all the questions about the economy, the poll indicated he was underwater. Conversely, a full 50 percent of these voters wanted him out of office.
Factors that entered into the viewers’ minds were the president’s character and health care, which mattered more than his economy numbers. They remembered the 2018 major failure when POTUS tried to run on the economy. They lost the House with embarrassingly high numbers.
It appeared, Fox voters wanted to invalidate the 2016 presidential choice and send Trump “on a permanent golf vacation at his own expense.”
The Mueller Report Adventures: In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page. These quick, two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people. Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery. Interestingly enough, Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order.


bipartisanreport--2020-01-26--Trump Rage Tweets At ‘Sleepy Chuck Todd’ While Watching Sunday TV

President Donald Trump is deeply and erratically paranoid .
This Sunday morning , he apparently tuned in to Meet the Press , where host Chuck Todd interviewed House Intelligence Committee Chairman and lead impeachment case manager Adam Schiff ( D-Calif. ) , who ’ s been among the leaders against the president in his ongoing Senate impeachment trial .
Trump… had some thoughts about the interview , after spending the earlier morning threatening Schiff as if the president is trying to be a mob boss .
He is still wrapped up in Schiff ’ s paraphrase from months ago of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This detail should be a footnote in the president ’ s impeachment , but Trump has worked himself up into a frenzy .
‘ After having been exposed as a fraud and corrupt , can anyone , including Sleepyeyes Chuck Todd of Fake @ NBCNews , continue to listen to his con ?
.. Sleepyeyes Chuck Todd of Meet the Corrupt Press , just had a “ totally ” softball interview with conman Adam Schiff , never even calling Shifty out on his fraudulent statement to Congress , where he made up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the Ukrainian President !
FAKE NEWS ’ Todd did not host a “ softball ” interview with Schiff , but considering the precedent of the president ’ s angry antagonism of his opponents , the host likely could have said just about anything and evoked the same response .
During Schiff ’ s time on Meet the Press , he did pointedly insist that without witnesses at the president ’ s trial , there will be no legitimate exoneration for him , no matter what the Republican majority in the Senate concludes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that Special Counsel Robert Mueller had actually exonerated him through his Russia investigation — although Mueller insisted otherwise — that ’ s likely to have unnerved the president .
Senate Republicans have feverishly attempted to block additional witnesses from the trial so far in an apparent effort to speed through an acquittal for the president .
Like it ’ s his comfort food or something , Trump continued from the above into another laundry list rant about how great that he and the Republican Party he leads supposedly are .
Is that why @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they lost dozens of Congressional seats and very low portions of the general public approve of them ?

President Donald Trump is deeply and erratically paranoid. This Sunday morning, he apparently tuned in to Meet the Press, where host Chuck Todd interviewed House Intelligence Committee Chairman and lead impeachment case manager Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who’s been among the leaders against the president in his ongoing Senate impeachment trial. Trump… had some thoughts about the interview, after spending the earlier morning threatening Schiff as if the president is trying to be a mob boss. He is still wrapped up in Schiff’s paraphrase from months ago of an infamous phone conversation that Trump had. This detail should be a footnote in the president’s impeachment, but Trump has worked himself up into a frenzy.
He tweeted:
‘After having been exposed as a fraud and corrupt, can anyone, including Sleepyeyes Chuck Todd of Fake @NBCNews , continue to listen to his con?.. Sleepyeyes Chuck Todd of Meet the Corrupt Press, just had a “totally” softball interview with conman Adam Schiff, never even calling Shifty out on his fraudulent statement to Congress, where he made up ALL of the words of my conversation with the Ukrainian President! FAKE NEWS’
After having been exposed as a fraud and corrupt, can anyone, including Sleepyeyes Chuck Todd of Fake @NBCNews, continue to listen to his con? — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 26, 2020
Sleepyeyes Chuck Todd of Meet the Corrupt Press, just had a “totally” softball interview with conman Adam Schiff, never even calling Shifty out on his fraudulent statement to Congress, where he made up ALL of the words of my conversation with the Ukrainian President! FAKE NEWS — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 26, 2020
Todd did not host a “softball” interview with Schiff, but considering the precedent of the president’s angry antagonism of his opponents, the host likely could have said just about anything and evoked the same response.
During Schiff’s time on Meet the Press, he did pointedly insist that without witnesses at the president’s trial, there will be no legitimate exoneration for him, no matter what the Republican majority in the Senate concludes. Considering his baseless obsession with proving that Special Counsel Robert Mueller had actually exonerated him through his Russia investigation — although Mueller insisted otherwise — that’s likely to have unnerved the president. Senate Republicans have feverishly attempted to block additional witnesses from the trial so far in an apparent effort to speed through an acquittal for the president.
EXCLUSIVE: Adam Schiff says, even if the Trump defense team is “successful in depriving the country of a fair trial, there is no exoneration” #MTP #IfItsSunday@RepAdamSchiff: “Americans will recognize that the country did not get what the founders intended.” pic.twitter.com/vCB136XY68 — Meet the Press (@MeetThePress) January 26, 2020
Like it’s his comfort food or something, Trump continued from the above into another laundry list rant about how great that he and the Republican Party he leads supposedly are. Is that why, in the most recent elections, they lost dozens of Congressional seats and very low portions of the general public approve of them?
95% Approval Rating in the Republican Party. Thank you! 191 Federal Judges (a record), and two Supreme Court Justices, approved. Best Economy & Employment Numbers EVER. Thank you to our great New, Smart and Nimble REPUBLICAN PARTY. Join now, it’s where people want to be! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 26, 2020
Check out Twitter’s response…


bipartisanreport--2020-01-26--Trump Devastated After More Audio Recordings Announced By Parnas’ Attorney

A guy born in then-Russian ( USSR ) Odesa , Ukraine moved with his family to America when he was three-years-old and subsequently , he became a naturalized American citizen .
The 47-year-old Lev Parnas ’ worked for King Highway Realty selling Trump co-ops .
Then , Parnas moved to Florida in 1995 .
He worked with a business associate Igor Fruman in an energy project .
Then in 2019 , Parnas worked for DiGenova & Toensing as a translator to Dmytro Firtash .
If that name appeared familiar , it was because Firtash was a Ukrainian oligarch close to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been living in Vienna fighting extradition to the U.S. Then , Parnas and Firtash began working with Donald Trump ’ s TV attorney and fixer Rudy Giuliani .
A Swiss attorney loaned the translator $ 1 million , which was placed in one of his wife ’ s accounts .
The SDNY ( Southern District of New York ) indicted Parnas , and he has been out on bail .
Recently , Parnas has been appearing on MSNBC ’ s The Rachel Maddow show and for CNN ’ s Anderson Cooper .
He @ @ @ @ @ @ @ place .
According to the businessman , he had a vital recording of Donald Trump in a donor dinner .
The video has since been verified , recording an image of the president on April 30 , 2018 , then going to sound only .
It accomplished a couple of mandates : Trump did know Parnas , which the president has repeatedly and characteristically denied .
Second , POTUS ordered the table in general , and no one in particular , to “ take out ” to “ get rid of her , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Marie Yovanovitch .
Parnas was telling Trump that she had been bad-mouthing the American president in Kyiv .
He was repeating information from his business associate Fruman .
Parnas later apologized on-air with Maddow to the American ambassador .
ABC broke the recording story originally , then it was later separately verified by MSNBC .
Fruman made the recording at a small dinner with Trump at his Trump International Hotel in Washington , D.C. Parnas ’ attorney Joseph Bondy confirmed that Fruman sent his client the recording .
When Cooper asked the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he responded “ I do not know ” according to CNN : After Cooper asked Bondy whether there were more recordings with Trump , the attorney said “ Yes.
” Then the CNN host pressed him on whether Parnas intended to release those recording , his attorney played coy : Bondy ’ s client told Maddow that the U.S. president “ knew exactly what was going on ” when Parnas was working with former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani .
Trump ’ s fixer , Fruman , and Parnas had been sent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The men were trying to acquire false information against Trump ’ s top 2020 presidential opponent , former Vice President Joe Biden .
The Mueller Report Adventures : In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page .
These quick , two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people .
Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery .
Interestingly enough , Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order .

A guy born in then-Russian (USSR) Odesa, Ukraine moved with his family to America when he was three-years-old and subsequently, he became a naturalized American citizen. The 47-year-old Lev Parnas’ worked for King Highway Realty selling Trump co-ops.
Then, Parnas moved to Florida in 1995. He worked with a business associate Igor Fruman in an energy project. Then in 2019, Parnas worked for DiGenova & Toensing as a translator to Dmytro Firtash. If that name appeared familiar, it was because Firtash was a Ukrainian oligarch close to Russian President Vladimir Putin. Firtash has been living in Vienna fighting extradition to the U.S.
Then, Parnas and Firtash began working with Donald Trump’s TV attorney and fixer Rudy Giuliani. A Swiss attorney loaned the translator $1 million, which was placed in one of his wife’s accounts. The SDNY (Southern District of New York) indicted Parnas, and he has been out on bail.
Recently, Parnas has been appearing on MSNBC’s The Rachel Maddow show and for CNN’s Anderson Cooper. He has been dumping evidence all over the place. According to the businessman, he had a vital recording of Donald Trump in a donor dinner.
The video has since been verified, recording an image of the president on April 30, 2018, then going to sound only. It accomplished a couple of mandates: Trump did know Parnas, which the president has repeatedly and characteristically denied. Second, POTUS ordered the table in general, and no one in particular, to “take out” to “get rid of her,” meaning the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch.
Parnas was telling Trump that she had been bad-mouthing the American president in Kyiv. He was repeating information from his business associate Fruman. Parnas later apologized on-air with Maddow to the American ambassador.
ABC broke the recording story originally, then it was later separately verified by MSNBC. Fruman made the recording at a small dinner with Trump at his Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C.
Parnas’ attorney Joseph Bondy confirmed that Fruman sent his client the recording. When Cooper asked the attorney why Fruman made the recording, he responded “I do not know” according to CNN:
‘I don’t know why he made the recordings. Some people make recordings. They like to take pictures. I can’t ascribe any kind of motive beyond that.’
After Cooper asked Bondy whether there were more recordings with Trump, the attorney said “Yes.” Then the CNN host pressed him on whether Parnas intended to release those recording, his attorney played coy:
‘We’ve sent recordings to the House Intelligence Committee also. This seems to be the recording that certainly addresses the issue of the Ambassador and we thought it was really important to get that recording out in public today.’
Bondy’s client told Maddow that the U.S. president “knew exactly what was going on” when Parnas was working with former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani. Trump’s fixer, Fruman, and Parnas had been sent to Ukraine at the behest of POTUS. The men were trying to acquire false information against Trump’s top 2020 presidential opponent, former Vice President Joe Biden.
The Mueller Report Adventures: In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page. These quick, two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people. Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery. Interestingly enough, Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order.


bipartisanreport--2020-01-26--Tom Cotton Attempts ‘CBS Sunday’ Trump Defense But Fails Miserably

This Saturday morning , President Donald Trump ’ s team kicked off their attempted defense of their client in his Senate impeachment trial , and they quickly resorted to outlandish tirades against Democrats .
They ’ ve also been fiercely advocating against hearing from any more witnesses for the trial , no matter the material relevance of their testimonies to the case against the president .
This weekend , during an appearance on CBS ’ s Face The Nation , Trump defender Sen. Tom Cotton ( R-Ark . )
denounced the idea of hearing from any more witnesses , claiming @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the case — although it ’ s the president who has dragged the issue out by demanding that the witnesses stay away .
Cotton ’ s defense of the president even included him defending the president ’ s behavior in a tape in which he can be heard demanding that Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch be “ taken out.
” First , Cotton told host Margaret Brennan : ‘ I ’ m not going to vote to approve witnesses , because the House Democrats have had lots of witnesses .
We heard from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this week .
We don ’ t need to prolong what ’ s already taken five months of the American people ’ s time .
The House Democrats have not proven their case against Donald Trump .
We don ’ t need to prolong this matter… the last five days have kind of been a microcosm of the last five months.
’ So has the impeachment gone too fast or too slow ?
Depending on the day , Republicans have argued both sides in their long list of attempts to try and prop @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whether or not to hear from additional witnesses is slated to be considered soon , after opening arguments conclude and Senators submit questions .
Brennan went on from the above to ask Cotton about Trump ’ s defense team already resorting to touting the conspiracy theory that Ukraine orchestrated some kind of meddling in the 2016 U.S. elections .
The idea is that the supposed meddling would bolster Trump ’ s case for the investigation that he tried to bribe Ukraine into launching , which has driven the impeachment proceedings .
Brennan pointed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( N.D. ) said that even he ’ d prefer that the Trump defense team stayed away from that claim considering the intelligence community ’ s long-documented conclusion that it was Russia who led the meddling , but Cotton denounced criticism of the conspiracy theory as a “ Democratic talking point.
” However , in this pesky thing called reality , Ukraine led no systematic election meddling campaign in the same universe of scope as what Russia did .
But Cotton seems ready to go along with the president ’ s wildest conspiracy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no evidence that she actually launched any kind of conspiracy against the president , he defended Trump reacting to conspiracy theories about Ambassador Yovanovitch by ranting “ take her out !
” Hilariously , Cotton went on to claim that Trump was not “ hasty ” or “ precipitous , ” because the video in question was taken months before Yovanovitch was actually fired .
Has Cotton ever actually followed the president ’ s decision-making process ?
Just check his Twitter feed .
Hasty and brash is the only way that he operates @

This Saturday morning, President Donald Trump’s team kicked off their attempted defense of their client in his Senate impeachment trial, and they quickly resorted to outlandish tirades against Democrats. They’ve also been fiercely advocating against hearing from any more witnesses for the trial, no matter the material relevance of their testimonies to the case against the president. This weekend, during an appearance on CBS’s Face The Nation, Trump defender Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) denounced the idea of hearing from any more witnesses, claiming that the push is just Democratic mishandling of the case — although it’s the president who has dragged the issue out by demanding that the witnesses stay away.
Cotton’s defense of the president even included him defending the president’s behavior in a tape in which he can be heard demanding that Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch be “taken out.” First, Cotton told host Margaret Brennan:
‘I’m not going to vote to approve witnesses, because the House Democrats have had lots of witnesses. We heard from them over and over and over again this week. We don’t need to prolong what’s already taken five months of the American people’s time. The House Democrats have not proven their case against Donald Trump. We don’t need to prolong this matter… the last five days have kind of been a microcosm of the last five months.’
So has the impeachment gone too fast or too slow? Depending on the day, Republicans have argued both sides in their long list of attempts to try and prop up the president. The question of whether or not to hear from additional witnesses is slated to be considered soon, after opening arguments conclude and Senators submit questions.
#IMPEACHMENT WITNESSES: “I’m not going to vote to approve witnesses,” @SenTomCotton tells @margbrennan. Adds, he won’t “forecast” how other senators will vote in the trial. pic.twitter.com/t54yt0mnG9 — Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) January 26, 2020
Brennan went on from the above to ask Cotton about Trump’s defense team already resorting to touting the conspiracy theory that Ukraine orchestrated some kind of meddling in the 2016 U.S. elections. The idea is that the supposed meddling would bolster Trump’s case for the investigation that he tried to bribe Ukraine into launching, which has driven the impeachment proceedings. Brennan pointed out that Republican leader Sen. John Thune (N.D.) said that even he’d prefer that the Trump defense team stayed away from that claim considering the intelligence community’s long-documented conclusion that it was Russia who led the meddling, but Cotton denounced criticism of the conspiracy theory as a “Democratic talking point.” However, in this pesky thing called reality, Ukraine led no systematic election meddling campaign in the same universe of scope as what Russia did.
#IMPEACHMENT QUESTIONS: @SenTomCotton says after House Democrats presented their opening arguments, there are now “real questions” about Hunter Biden’s role as a board member of Ukranian energy company Burisma. pic.twitter.com/eLHacgkvES — Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) January 26, 2020
But Cotton seems ready to go along with the president’s wildest conspiracy theories anyway. Although there remains absolutely no evidence that she actually launched any kind of conspiracy against the president, he defended Trump reacting to conspiracy theories about Ambassador Yovanovitch by ranting “take her out!”
Cotton claimed:
‘An ambassador badmouthing the president is a pretty sound reason to remove an ambassador.’
“Badmouthing is a pretty good reason to fire an ambassador," @SenTomCotton tells @margbrennan in response to new CBS-obtained video of Trump calling to "get rid of" former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch pic.twitter.com/vTg2gHLqJw — Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) January 26, 2020
Hilariously, Cotton went on to claim that Trump was not “hasty” or “precipitous,” because the video in question was taken months before Yovanovitch was actually fired. Has Cotton ever actually followed the president’s decision-making process? Just check his Twitter feed. Hasty and brash is the only way that he operates.


bipartisanreport--2020-01-26--Romney Terrifies Trump With Vote For Impeachment Witness Weekend Statement

Is there any chance that the Democrats will be able to see the witness and evidence that Donald Trump has frozen in place and refused the House Democrats ’ impeachment trial ?
Maybe so .
There is one traditional senator who has indicated that he will vote for witnesses , but why is that so important ?
The Utah Senator Mitt Romney ( R-UT ) who also ran for president , has the skills to bring other Republicans along with him .
This influence may be under-rated by both parties .
Romney said after the House managers ( prosecutorial attorneys @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reported that the senator said : When reporters asked him about House Intelligence Committee chair and impeachment hearing lead Representative Adam Schiff ( D-CA ) , Romney replied : The conservative senator now represents the farthest left senator in office .
He has already expressed his negative opinions about Trump .
He also said that he wanted to hear from former National Security Adviser John Bolton .
The former Trump adviser has offered his willingness to testify .
Romney said : At this point in time , the Democrats would need four GOP @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in order to subpoena witnesses and/or receive evidentiary documents .
Those four senators might include Romney and : Collins and Murkowski have have expressed interest in hearing from the witnesses .
After all , what trial is really a trial without witnesses and evidence ?
However , the two women spoke aloud at the conclusion of the Democrats ’ opening statements .
When Schiff quoted a CBS story saying that Trump warned those who voted with the Democrats would have their heads on a pike , the two were offended .
Senate Majority @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to let the Democrats subpoena witnesses and evidence until after the opening statements and the question-answer period .
The proper time would have been prior to those statements .
That would have given the senators time to subpoena witnesses , collect documents , and prepare to hear the witnesses .
The Democrats need a 51-49 simple majority vote to get the witnesses and documents : Of course , McConnell railed against hearing witnesses .
He claimed it would “ raise constitutional concerns.
” A CNN source indicated that McConnell wanted a quick end @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Adventures : In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page .
These quick , two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people .
Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery .
Interestingly enough , Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order .

Is there any chance that the Democrats will be able to see the witness and evidence that Donald Trump has frozen in place and refused the House Democrats’ impeachment trial? Maybe so. There is one traditional senator who has indicated that he will vote for witnesses, but why is that so important?
The Utah Senator Mitt Romney (R-UT) who also ran for president, has the skills to bring other Republicans along with him. This influence may be under-rated by both parties. Romney said after the House managers (prosecutorial attorneys) made their opening arguments. CNN reported that the senator said:
‘I think it’s very likely I’ll be in favor of witnesses, but I haven’t made a decision finally yet and I won’t until the testimony is completed.’
When reporters asked him about House Intelligence Committee chair and impeachment hearing lead Representative Adam Schiff (D-CA), Romney replied:
“I just don’t have any comments on the process or the evidence until the trial is over.”
The conservative senator now represents the farthest left senator in office. He has already expressed his negative opinions about Trump. He also said that he wanted to hear from former National Security Adviser John Bolton. The former Trump adviser has offered his willingness to testify. Romney said:
‘I would like to hear from John Bolton and other witnesses, but at the same time I’m comfortable with the Clinton impeachment model when we have opening arguments first and then we have a vote on whether to have witnesses.’
At this point in time, the Democrats would need four GOP senators to move over to their side in order to subpoena witnesses and/or receive evidentiary documents. Those four senators might include Romney and:
‘Senators Susan Collins (R-ME), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and possibly the Colorado senator most in danger of losing his 2020 vote Cory Gardner (R-CO).’
Collins and Murkowski have have expressed interest in hearing from the witnesses. After all, what trial is really a trial without witnesses and evidence? However, the two women spoke aloud at the conclusion of the Democrats’ opening statements. When Schiff quoted a CBS story saying that Trump warned those who voted with the Democrats would have their heads on a pike, the two were offended.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) refused to let the Democrats subpoena witnesses and evidence until after the opening statements and the question-answer period. The proper time would have been prior to those statements. That would have given the senators time to subpoena witnesses, collect documents, and prepare to hear the witnesses.
The Democrats need a 51-49 simple majority vote to get the witnesses and documents:
Of course, McConnell railed against hearing witnesses. He claimed it would “raise constitutional concerns.” A CNN source indicated that McConnell wanted a quick end to the hearing.
The Mueller Report Adventures: In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page. These quick, two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people. Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery. Interestingly enough, Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order.


bipartisanreport--2020-01-26--Alan Dershowitz’s ‘Fox News Sunday’ Appearance Humiliates Trump/GOP

This Saturday , President Donald Trump ’ s team kicked off their attempt at a defense for their client in his ongoing Senate impeachment trial .
Their complete inability to actually contest the facts of the situation quickly became abundantly clear .
The documented facts of the situation are that Trump tried to pressure Ukraine into investigating his domestic political opponents , including the Bidens and Democratic Party in general .
This weekend during an appearance on Fox News Sunday , Trump lawyer Alan Dershowitz — whose past clients include O.J .
Simpson and Jeffrey Epstein — argued that as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t even constitute an impeachable offense !
His claim is that offenses which presidents are impeached over should only be those which parallel behavior that ’ s actually outlined as illegal in criminal statutes , which seems patently ridiculous on its face , besides the fact that he argued the exact opposite when advocating for the 1990s impeachment of Bill Clinton .
Trump ’ s scheme , as Fox News contributor Judge Andrew Napolitano recently pointed out , includes apparent illegal efforts to procure foreign election help , bribery , and contempt of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ parallels to actual crimes .
Dershowitz explained that yes , that ’ s exactly what he ’ s saying .
‘ Well , the defense team tomorrow will show that it ’ s not true , that many of the issues that were presented , were presented incompletely… The legal argument is that since they didn ’ t allege any impeachable offenses , since they only alleged abuse of power and obstruction of Congress — and those are vague , open-ended criteria of exactly the sort the Framers had rejected… that yes , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they did not allege impeachable offenses.
’ Dershowitz ’ s argument also seems ridiculous in that alleging that we should only abide by what ’ s outlined in the criminal code , presumably as perceived by the framers of the Constitution , he wants us to stick to a system developed when slavery was legal and some of the most advanced weaponry included muskets , cannons , and muskets and cannons in boats .
As he indicated , the Trump defense team seems likely to zero in on an argument that the president @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seek a Ukrainian investigation of his political opponents , because — they seem ready to claim — the corruption allegations it was to be founded upon are legit — but , the problem is , they ’ re not .
Dershowitz can gesticulate to high heaven about the need to allege an actual crime ( which impeachment case managers have ) , but his own side has failed to credibly allege any actual crime committed by the president ’ s opponents who he was trying to get investigated .
The president is sticking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a mob boss .
He insisted that House Intelligence Committee Chairman and impeachment case manager Adam Schiff ( D-Calif. ) “ has not paid the price , yet , for what he has done to our Country !
” Trump is off the rails .

This Saturday, President Donald Trump’s team kicked off their attempt at a defense for their client in his ongoing Senate impeachment trial. Their complete inability to actually contest the facts of the situation quickly became abundantly clear. The documented facts of the situation are that Trump tried to pressure Ukraine into investigating his domestic political opponents, including the Bidens and Democratic Party in general. This weekend during an appearance on Fox News Sunday, Trump lawyer Alan Dershowitz — whose past clients include O.J. Simpson and Jeffrey Epstein — argued that as alleged, that bribery scheme doesn’t even constitute an impeachable offense!
His claim is that offenses which presidents are impeached over should only be those which parallel behavior that’s actually outlined as illegal in criminal statutes, which seems patently ridiculous on its face, besides the fact that he argued the exact opposite when advocating for the 1990s impeachment of Bill Clinton. Trump’s scheme, as Fox News contributor Judge Andrew Napolitano recently pointed out, includes apparent illegal efforts to procure foreign election help, bribery, and contempt of Congress. Dershowitz conveniently ignored these easy parallels to actual crimes.
Host Chris Wallace asked:
‘Let’s assume that… the president used the power of his office… to pressure Ukraine to investigate, to get oppo research on one of his main rivals for 2020, Joe Biden… You’re saying it’s still not an impeachable offense?’
Dershowitz explained that yes, that’s exactly what he’s saying.
He replied:
‘Well, the defense team tomorrow will show that it’s not true, that many of the issues that were presented, were presented incompletely… The legal argument is that since they didn’t allege any impeachable offenses, since they only alleged abuse of power and obstruction of Congress — and those are vague, open-ended criteria of exactly the sort the Framers had rejected… that yes, even if the factual allegations are true… they did not allege impeachable offenses.’
Watch:
Alan Dershowitz, member of the White House legal team, joined FOX News Sunday. Did the House impeachment managers make a strong case in their opening arguments? Alan Dershowitz makes his case that the president did not commit an impeachable act. #FNS #FoxNews pic.twitter.com/cKW26UlPWz — FoxNewsSunday (@FoxNewsSunday) January 26, 2020
Dershowitz’s argument also seems ridiculous in that alleging that we should only abide by what’s outlined in the criminal code, presumably as perceived by the framers of the Constitution, he wants us to stick to a system developed when slavery was legal and some of the most advanced weaponry included muskets, cannons, and muskets and cannons in boats.
As he indicated, the Trump defense team seems likely to zero in on an argument that the president was actually completely in the right to seek a Ukrainian investigation of his political opponents, because — they seem ready to claim — the corruption allegations it was to be founded upon are legit — but, the problem is, they’re not. Dershowitz can gesticulate to high heaven about the need to allege an actual crime (which impeachment case managers have), but his own side has failed to credibly allege any actual crime committed by the president’s opponents who he was trying to get investigated.
The president is sticking to tactics that make him sound like a mob boss. He insisted that House Intelligence Committee Chairman and impeachment case manager Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) “has not paid the price, yet, for what he has done to our Country!” Trump is off the rails.
Shifty Adam Schiff is a CORRUPT POLITICIAN, and probably a very sick man. He has not paid the price, yet, for what he has done to our Country! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 26, 2020


bipartisanreport--2020-01-26--New Trump Approval Poll Released Confirms Giant 2020 Blue Wave

The president is on trial , charged with two articles of impeachment by the Democratically-led House of Representatives .
These results are on right on target with other polls ’ results .
However , the Republican-held Senate appears to be ignoring their voters .
A new survey from Insider SurveyMonkey indicated that those voters under the age of 30 want Donald Trump removed from office more than any other group .
For those 18-29 , “ 63 percent said remove him ” versus the 24 percent who believed he should stay in office .
There was 13 percent who had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Insider : • ‘ Among Americans aged 18-29 , 63 % said Trump should be removed from office , compared to 24 % who think he shouldn ’ t be , and 13 % who didn ’ t know .
• For Americans aged 30-44 , 56 % said Trump should be removed from office in contrast with 28 % who think he should not be removed , and 15.8 % who don ’ t know .
• Among those aged 45-60 , 47.6 % think that Trump should be removed from office @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should not be removed , and 10 % who don ’ t know .
• For Americans aged 60 and older , a narrow majority of 51 % believed Trump should be removed from office in contrast to 40 % who think he should not be removed , and 8 % who don ’ t know.
’ People appeared to be more interested in the impeachment trial of Trump that their legislative representatives tended to understand .
Younger voters have not traditionally voted .
The elections of 2020 may prove to be an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has been charged with two articles of impeachment .
The first was for abusing the power of his office .
The second one was for obstruction Congress by freezing out all documents and witnesses from Congress ’ requests and subpoenas .
There were two basic questions before the Senate .
Did the senators want to hear evidence and witnesses ?
The second vote would be : Did they want to remove Trump from office ?
The first question required a simple majority of 51 to 49 senators .
The second required 67 senators @ @ @ @ @ @ @ managers aka attorneys have presented their opening arguments against the man currently sitting in the Oval Office .
After their conclusion on Friday , the president ’ s attorney ’ s set up the president ’ s defense in a brief two-hour Saturday session .
Those attornies included the White House Counsel Pat Cipollone and a second attorney Jay Sekulow .
The charges also included Trump sending his personal TV attorney Rudy Giuliani to Ukraine and others in the White House working in D.C. to halt a congressionally-approved $ 391 million military aid @ @ @ @ @ @ @ charge claimed that the president did so to throw the 2020 presidential his way .
In comparison , the Pew Research Center released a survey last week with similar results , especially noting the majority of Americans wanted the president removed .
It showed 63 percent of American voters in the age group between 18-20 and 55 percent of those in the group 30 to 49-years old wanted Trump convicted .
Business Insider interviewed 1,070 American voters and asked whether the president should be “ impeached and removed from office.
” The Mueller @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Facebook page .
These quick , two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people .
Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery .
Interestingly enough , Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order .

The president is on trial, charged with two articles of impeachment by the Democratically-led House of Representatives. These results are on right on target with other polls’ results. However, the Republican-held Senate appears to be ignoring their voters.
A new survey from Insider SurveyMonkey indicated that those voters under the age of 30 want Donald Trump removed from office more than any other group. For those 18-29, “63 percent said remove him” versus the 24 percent who believed he should stay in office. There was 13 percent who had no opinion, according to The Business Insider:
‘Among Americans aged 18-29 , 63% said Trump should be removed from office, compared to 24% who think he shouldn’t be, and 13% who didn’t know.
, 63% said Trump should be removed from office, compared to 24% who think he shouldn’t be, and 13% who didn’t know. For Americans aged 30-44, 56% said Trump should be removed from office in contrast with 28% who think he should not be removed, and 15.8% who don’t know.
56% said Trump should be removed from office in contrast with 28% who think he should not be removed, and 15.8% who don’t know. Among those aged 45-60, 47.6% think that Trump should be removed from office compared to 42% who think he should not be removed, and 10% who don’t know.
47.6% think that Trump should be removed from office compared to 42% who think he should not be removed, and 10% who don’t know. For Americans aged 60 and older, a narrow majority of 51% believed Trump should be removed from office in contrast to 40% who think he should not be removed, and 8% who don’t know.’
People appeared to be more interested in the impeachment trial of Trump that their legislative representatives tended to understand. Younger voters have not traditionally voted. The elections of 2020 may prove to be an exception to that rule.
The president has been charged with two articles of impeachment. The first was for abusing the power of his office. The second one was for obstruction Congress by freezing out all documents and witnesses from Congress’ requests and subpoenas.
There were two basic questions before the Senate. Did the senators want to hear evidence and witnesses? The second vote would be: Did they want to remove Trump from office? The first question required a simple majority of 51 to 49 senators. The second required 67 senators or a two-thirds majority.
The House managers aka attorneys have presented their opening arguments against the man currently sitting in the Oval Office. After their conclusion on Friday, the president’s attorney’s set up the president’s defense in a brief two-hour Saturday session. Those attornies included the White House Counsel Pat Cipollone and a second attorney Jay Sekulow.
The charges also included Trump sending his personal TV attorney Rudy Giuliani to Ukraine and others in the White House working in D.C. to halt a congressionally-approved $391 million military aid from going to war-torn Ukraine. The charge claimed that the president did so to throw the 2020 presidential his way.
In comparison, the Pew Research Center released a survey last week with similar results, especially noting the majority of Americans wanted the president removed. It showed 63 percent of American voters in the age group between 18-20 and 55 percent of those in the group 30 to 49-years old wanted Trump convicted.
Business Insider interviewed 1,070 American voters and asked whether the president should be “impeached and removed from office.”
The Mueller Report Adventures: In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page. These quick, two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people. Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery. Interestingly enough, Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order.


bipartisanreport--2020-01-27--Obama Gives Kobe Bryant Tribute Like Our Real Leader

There is such a difference between President Barack Obama and the man who took his office but will never fill his shoes .
People long for the man who was presidential , especially at times like these — when American ’ s heart has been rubbed raw .
President Obama tweeted about a beloved basketball star , Kobe Bryant and his 13-year-old daughter Gianna who were killed in a helicopter crash Sunday morning .
Obama ’ s words have always worked to soothe the nation , and his tweet reminded us why .
Obama touched people ’ s hearts with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but also honoring the entire family , holding them close .
He added “ to lose Gianna is even more heartbreaking to us as parents : ” ‘ Kobe was a legend on the court and just getting started in what would have been just as meaningful a second act .
To lose Gianna is even more heartbreaking to us as parents .
Michelle and I send love and prayers to Vanessa and the entire Bryant family on an unthinkable day.
’ Twitter responded to their shared grief .
Take a few moments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mueller Report Adventures : In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page .
These quick , two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people .
Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery .
Interestingly enough , Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order .

There is such a difference between President Barack Obama and the man who took his office but will never fill his shoes. People long for the man who was presidential, especially at times like these — when American’s heart has been rubbed raw.
President Obama tweeted about a beloved basketball star, Kobe Bryant and his 13-year-old daughter Gianna who were killed in a helicopter crash Sunday morning. Obama’s words have always worked to soothe the nation, and his tweet reminded us why.
Obama touched people’s hearts with recognition not only of the star athlete but also honoring the entire family, holding them close. He added “to lose Gianna is even more heartbreaking to us as parents:”
‘Kobe was a legend on the court and just getting started in what would have been just as meaningful a second act. To lose Gianna is even more heartbreaking to us as parents. Michelle and I send love and prayers to Vanessa and the entire Bryant family on an unthinkable day.’
Twitter responded to their shared grief. Take a few moments to read their responses below:
Featured image is a screenshot via YouTube.
The Mueller Report Adventures: In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page. These quick, two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people. Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery. Interestingly enough, Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order.


bipartisanreport--2020-01-27--Pam Bondi Faces Wide Mockery For Monday Trial Antics

This Monday afternoon , President Donald Trump ’ s defense team took the stand in the Senate impeachment trial to try and make their boss ’ s case .
It didn ’ t go well , at least in terms of whether or not they seem to have made a case compelling to anyone at all who wasn ’ t already all-in for the president .
In a particularly grossly wild highlight , former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi launched into a tirade about the supposed corruption that the Bidens were involved in that supposedly necessitated Trump ’ s attempt @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The wild part is — Bondi herself accepted a large “ donation ” ( meaning apparent bribe ) from Trump shortly before she abruptly abandoned an investigation into one of his schemes .
The president ’ s team ’ s brazenly belligerent cover-up went on from there .
Bondi attracted a whole lot of attention for her hypocrisy .
As she pompously led with at one point : Well , here ’ s what happened when Bondi ’ s office as Florida Attorney General was confronted with the facts of Trump ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump University , which had no relationship to any kind of actual university whatsoever — she abruptly received a $ 25,000 donation from Trump ’ s supposedly charitable foundation ( which has since ceased operations ) and she dropped any further interest in the Trump University scheme .
Other high points of hypocrisy from her Monday Senate floor rants include a diatribe that she delivered against nepotism , as if she ’ s completely unaware of the large number of the president ’ s own family members who work for his administration and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s family members have any more prior political experience than he did — which is none — but Ivanka , her husband Jared , and others are hard at work doing who knows what anyway !
For Bondi and the president ’ s other defenders to resort to completely glossing over these facts constitutes another smoke and mirrors tactic .
Rather than addressing the fact that Trump tried to bribe Ukraine into investigating the Bidens , they ’ re trying to convince observers that the hoped for investigations were legit in the first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for this .

This Monday afternoon, President Donald Trump’s defense team took the stand in the Senate impeachment trial to try and make their boss’s case. It didn’t go well, at least in terms of whether or not they seem to have made a case compelling to anyone at all who wasn’t already all-in for the president. In a particularly grossly wild highlight, former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi launched into a tirade about the supposed corruption that the Bidens were involved in that supposedly necessitated Trump’s attempt to bribe Ukraine into investigating them. The wild part is — Bondi herself accepted a large “donation” (meaning apparent bribe) from Trump shortly before she abruptly abandoned an investigation into one of his schemes. The president’s team’s brazenly belligerent cover-up went on from there.
Bondi attracted a whole lot of attention for her hypocrisy. As she pompously led with at one point:
‘Here’s what happened very shortly after Vice President Biden was made U.S. point man for Ukraine. His son Hunter Biden ends up on the board of Burisma.’
Well, here’s what happened when Bondi’s office as Florida Attorney General was confronted with the facts of Trump’s completely fraudulent “educational” venture called Trump University, which had no relationship to any kind of actual university whatsoever — she abruptly received a $25,000 donation from Trump’s supposedly charitable foundation (which has since ceased operations) and she dropped any further interest in the Trump University scheme.
Other high points of hypocrisy from her Monday Senate floor rants include a diatribe that she delivered against nepotism, as if she’s completely unaware of the large number of the president’s own family members who work for his administration and campaign. None of the president’s family members have any more prior political experience than he did — which is none — but Ivanka, her husband Jared, and others are hard at work doing who knows what anyway!
For Bondi and the president’s other defenders to resort to completely glossing over these facts constitutes another smoke and mirrors tactic. Rather than addressing the fact that Trump tried to bribe Ukraine into investigating the Bidens, they’re trying to convince observers that the hoped for investigations were legit in the first place. There’s no evidence for this.
Check out Twitter’s response…
#Trump defense is now putting Hunter Biden on trial. So why didn’t #Barr investigate Hunter? #ImpeachmentTrial — Maya Wiley (@mayawiley) January 27, 2020
What Pam Bondi won’t say is the fact Shokin was fired because he *wasn’t* investigating corruption and that it was the policy of America *and* our global allies to get him removed. Just blatant dishonesty on the Senate floor. — Ahmed Baba (@AhmedBaba_) January 27, 2020
It's been almost four years and if the Bidens did anything illegal — why hasn't Trump investigated them? #ImpeachmentTrial — (((Charles Young))) (@CharlieYoungEsq) January 27, 2020
Just a little something #PamBondi omits: US Ambassador 2015 speech, coordinated with VP Biden, excoriating Ukraine Prosecutor Office for having covered up Burisma corruption. That's right: They went after Prosecutor Office for failing to confront Burisma. (Also Kent testimony) pic.twitter.com/ACfOwsrPyW — Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw) January 27, 2020
Assume Hunter Biden committed crimes in connection with Burisma. Assume the FBI somehow missed it. Why is Trump’s response is to ask Ukraine to investigate (with strings attached) instead of making sure it’s referred to US law enforcement for investigation? Not a defense. — Joyce Alene (@JoyceWhiteVance) January 27, 2020
Pam Bondi has thus far outlined how Hunter Biden benefited from nepotism in defense of a president who has employed his adult children in his administration and his presidential campaign. — Jacqueline Alemany (@JaxAlemany) January 27, 2020
As Pam Bondi regales the Senate with the tales of Barisma and Hunter Biden (ironic she would raise the spectre of "nepotism"), the happiest man in America is Donald Trump! What this has to do with Trump's "perfect phone call"?Well, nothing when the goal is to smear the #Bidens — Michael Steele (@MichaelSteele) January 27, 2020
The irony of Pam Bondi invoking nepotism as a defense. What about Jared and Ivanka? What qualifications do they have to be White House advisors besides nepotism. They are profiting enormously off their positions. #DefendOurDemocracy #ImpeachmentTrial #IMPOTUS pic.twitter.com/zotq3n2WMb — Curly Chrys (@CurlyChrys) January 27, 2020
Also a little something that #PamBondi left out — what @AshaRangappa_ said.👇 Why did the President of the United States ask Ukraine to announce a criminal investigation of the Bidens? What's the crime? https://t.co/kX7clPzdcA — Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw) January 27, 2020
The odd part of the Trump team's takedown of Hunter Biden just now is that it serves to confirm the House managers' case that the President was indeed engaged in impeachable behavior by asking a foreign government to investigate his political opponent. A terrible legal argument. — David Jolly (@DavidJollyFL) January 27, 2020


bipartisanreport--2020-01-27--Trump Livid After Murkowski Responds To Bolton Disclosure

Senator Lisa Murkowski is an interesting woman .
During her last election , her name was not on the Alaskan ballot , because she lost to her Senate race opponent .
That meant she was forced to have a write-in campaign .
Even with that tongue-twister of a name , people wrote her name in — spelled correctly .
Someone leaked Donald Trump ’ s former National Security Advisor ( NSA ) John Bolton ’ s latest manuscript to The New York Times .
That was when Murkowski decided that she said that she was curious to see what he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It Happened was aptly named .
The senator tweeted that she has worked to “ ensure this trial would be fair : ” ‘ ( 1/2 ) I stated before that I was curious as to what John Bolton might have to say .
From the outset , I ’ ve worked to ensure this trial would be fair and that members would have the opportunity to weigh in after its initial phase to determine if we need more information.
’ The Alaskan outdoorswoman continued , noting that the time to decide about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ here : ” Murkowski carries with her the independence and no-nonsense attitude found in many Alaskans .
She is a third-generation resident and became one of the state ’ s senators in 2002 .
The Alaskan senator has had a reputation of working “ collaboratively and across the aisle to reach common-sense solutions , ” according to her Senate page .
Twitter world caught fire after she announced her intentions .
Take a look at some of the really good ones below : The Mueller Report Adventures : In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interpret the report in normal English for busy people .
Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery .
Interestingly enough , Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order .

Senator Lisa Murkowski is an interesting woman. During her last election, her name was not on the Alaskan ballot, because she lost to her Senate race opponent. That meant she was forced to have a write-in campaign. Even with that tongue-twister of a name, people wrote her name in — spelled correctly.
Someone leaked Donald Trump’s former National Security Advisor (NSA) John Bolton’s latest manuscript to The New York Times. That was when Murkowski decided that she said that she was curious to see what he had to say. The Room Where It Happened was aptly named.
The senator tweeted that she has worked to “ensure this trial would be fair:”
‘(1/2) I stated before that I was curious as to what John Bolton might have to say. From the outset, I’ve worked to ensure this trial would be fair and that members would have the opportunity to weigh in after its initial phase to determine if we need more information.’
The Alaskan outdoorswoman continued, noting that the time to decide about “additional information” was “almost here:”
‘(2/2) I’ve also said there is an appropriate time for us to evaluate whether we need additional information —that time is almost here. I look forward to the White House wrapping up presentation of its case.’
Murkowski carries with her the independence and no-nonsense attitude found in many Alaskans. She is a third-generation resident and became one of the state’s senators in 2002. The Alaskan senator has had a reputation of working “collaboratively and across the aisle to reach common-sense solutions,” according to her Senate page.
Twitter world caught fire after she announced her intentions. Take a look at some of the really good ones below:
The Mueller Report Adventures: In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page. These quick, two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people. Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery. Interestingly enough, Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order.


bipartisanreport--2020-01-27--Trump Defense Lawyers Turn Senate Floor Into Circus Monday

This Monday , President Donald Trump ’ s defense team continued their attempt at making their client ’ s case on the floor of the Senate , and they quickly went to such outlandish extremes that one of them — personal Trump lawyer Jane Raskin , who also represented Trump during the Russia investigation — lauded the continuously conspiracy theory-shouting Rudy Giuliani as a supposed “ national hero.
” Besides the ridiculousness of that claim — do heroics now constitute lengthy rants on Fox News ?
— they also brazenly lied and claimed that Giuliani ’ s role in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the impeachment proceedings was a lot smaller than it actually was .
In reality , Giuliani personally , repeatedly went to Ukraine to try and pressure the country ’ s authorities into investigating the Bidens , and simultaneously , he attempted to collect evidence for his wild conspiracy theories — which now even include the bonkers claim that some unnamed nefarious forces tried to kill an opponent of the Bidens .
No matter his outlandish theatrics , Raskin pushed some alternative facts about Giuliani .
She told the Senate : ‘ The House @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Giuliani is at the center of this controversy .
They ’ ve anointed him the proxy villain of the tale , the leader of a rogue operation .
Their presentations were filled with ad hominem attacks and name-calling … but I suggest to you he ’ s front and center in their narrative for one reason alone : to distract from the fact that the evidence does not support their claims.
’ Raskin went so far that she even criticized the Russia investigation .
She insisted that Giuliani was only trying to dig @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his client against the false allegations being investigated by special counsel Robert Mueller.
” The idea is that if he could prove that Ukraine led election meddling , then the facts of Trump ’ s cooperation with Russia could be overturned .
Indeed — Giuliani was a point man for the president ’ s scheme to bribe Ukraine into investigating his domestic political opponents , including the Bidens .
These investigations were meant to be based on completely baseless allegations that while Vice President , Joe Biden pressured Ukraine to fire a top @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in reality , that prosecutor was widely considered corrupt .
And Joseph Brody , who ’ s a lawyer for Giuliani ’ s former associate Lev Parnas , added another fierce rebuttal of Raskin ’ s claims .
No matter the baselessness of their arguments , the president and his defenders are feverishly continuing .
After their opening arguments conclude and Senators submit their initial questions , the question of whether or not to hear from witnesses is set to be again formally considered .

This Monday, President Donald Trump’s defense team continued their attempt at making their client’s case on the floor of the Senate, and they quickly went to such outlandish extremes that one of them — personal Trump lawyer Jane Raskin, who also represented Trump during the Russia investigation — lauded the continuously conspiracy theory-shouting Rudy Giuliani as a supposed “national hero.” Besides the ridiculousness of that claim — do heroics now constitute lengthy rants on Fox News? — they also brazenly lied and claimed that Giuliani’s role in the Ukraine bribery scandal at the center of the impeachment proceedings was a lot smaller than it actually was.
In reality, Giuliani personally, repeatedly went to Ukraine to try and pressure the country’s authorities into investigating the Bidens, and simultaneously, he attempted to collect evidence for his wild conspiracy theories — which now even include the bonkers claim that some unnamed nefarious forces tried to kill an opponent of the Bidens.
No matter his outlandish theatrics, Raskin pushed some alternative facts about Giuliani. She told the Senate:
‘The House managers would have you believe that Mr. Giuliani is at the center of this controversy. They’ve anointed him the proxy villain of the tale, the leader of a rogue operation. Their presentations were filled with ad hominem attacks and name-calling … but I suggest to you he’s front and center in their narrative for one reason alone: to distract from the fact that the evidence does not support their claims.’
Raskin went so far that she even criticized the Russia investigation. She insisted that Giuliani was only trying to dig up those conspiracy theories “to defend his client against the false allegations being investigated by special counsel Robert Mueller.” The idea is that if he could prove that Ukraine led election meddling, then the facts of Trump’s cooperation with Russia could be overturned.
The House Intelligence Committee’s Democratic majority abruptly issued a public rebuttal to Raskin’s false claims.
They shared:
‘Reality: Witnesses testified that Trump directed them to “talk to Rudy” about Ukraine. Trump himself mentioned Giuliani on the call with Zelensky. And Ukrainians viewed Rudy as “the key.”‘
White House Claim: Rudy Giuliani is “a minor player.” Reality: Witnesses testified that Trump directed them to "talk to Rudy" about Ukraine. Trump himself mentioned Giuliani on the call with Zelensky. And Ukrainians viewed Rudy as "the key." #TruthMatters pic.twitter.com/dCapHobQif — House Intelligence Committee (@HouseIntel) January 27, 2020
Indeed — Giuliani was a point man for the president’s scheme to bribe Ukraine into investigating his domestic political opponents, including the Bidens. These investigations were meant to be based on completely baseless allegations that while Vice President, Joe Biden pressured Ukraine to fire a top prosecutor to protect his son — but in reality, that prosecutor was widely considered corrupt.
And Joseph Brody, who’s a lawyer for Giuliani’s former associate Lev Parnas, added another fierce rebuttal of Raskin’s claims.
He tweeted:
‘The White House claim that Rudy Giuliani was a minor player is false. RG directed Lev Parnas, including giving quid pro quos to Ukranian President Poroshenko & Zelensky Chief of Staff, on behalf of Trump. The evidentiary record corroborates Parnas.’
The White House claim that Rudy Giuliani was a minor player is false. RG directed Lev Parnas, including giving quid pro quos to Ukranian President Poroshenko & Zelensky Chief of Staff, on behalf of Trump. The evidentiary record corroborates Parnas. #LetLevSpeak #CallTheWitnesses https://t.co/Q5wSIZO5pS — Joseph A. Bondy (@josephabondy) January 27, 2020
No matter the baselessness of their arguments, the president and his defenders are feverishly continuing. After their opening arguments conclude and Senators submit their initial questions, the question of whether or not to hear from witnesses is set to be again formally considered.


bipartisanreport--2020-01-27--Susan Collins Turns On Trump After Bolton Book Confession

Senator Susan Collins ( R-ME ) has a technique that is like one of Lucy van Pelt ’ s moves .
She is the older sister of Linus and Rerun in Charles Schultz ’ s Peanuts cartoons and frequently found at her advice dispensing booth .
Schultz described her as a “ fussbudget , crabby , bossy , opinionated , ” all acceptable in a senator .
And he includes another aspect of her character : she is a bully .
How is she a bully ?
Like Collins who holds the ball of probability , of voting against the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Charlie Brown to kick .
Then at the very last moment , she snatches her vote away and hands it off to the Republican majority .
That is not especially nice of Lucy .
It took John Bolton ’ s book with the glaring title of The Room Where It Happened to jolt a few senators off of the Donald Trump bus to treachery .
They may still be hanging on , but the country can always hope they loosen that iron grip .
Two of the moderate Republican senators indicated that quotes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bolton made the defense team ’ s case somewhat weaker .
They added that Bolton would be a “ relevant ” witness .
The Democrats would need to keep all of their Senate votes and convince four additional Republican senators to come over to their side and vote to request witnesses .
Some of those might be : Romney , Collins , Lisa Murkowski ( R-AK ) , and Lamar Alexander ( R-TN ) .
Moderate Senator Collins sent out her tweeted statement .
She said : More independent than Republican Murkowski said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ former Massachusetts governor and presidential candidate Senator Mitt Romney ( R-UT ) noted that calling witnesses was “ increasingly likely : ” Romney told reporters that he hasn ’ t fully made up his mind on calling witnesses , but what Bolton has to say is “ relevant ” and “ therefore I ’ d like to hear it.
” Most subservient to Donald Trump , Senator Lindsey Graham ( R-SC ) said : Senator Josh Hawley ( R-MO ) said on Fox & Friends that should the Democrats call witnesses , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he wanted : ‘ it ’ s [ Bolton ’ s book ] certainly going to sell a lot of [ copies . ]
Listen , I can ’ t tell from the New York Times report what is actually being reported here , ” he said .
“ I can ’ t tell if this is something new .
I can ’ t tell if they ’ ve actually seen the manuscript .
It ’ s all a bunch of hearsay and clearly it ’ s an attempt to try to influence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ John Cornyn ( R-TX ) also spoke on Fox & Friends .
He hinted broadly that “ the timing ” of Bolton ’ s manuscript was “ a little interesting , isn ’ t it ?
” Then , he said : The Mueller Report Adventures : In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page .
These quick , two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people .
Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery .
Interestingly enough , Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order .

Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) has a technique that is like one of Lucy van Pelt’s moves. She is the older sister of Linus and Rerun in Charles Schultz’s Peanuts cartoons and frequently found at her advice dispensing booth. Schultz described her as a “fussbudget, crabby, bossy, opinionated,” all acceptable in a senator. And he includes another aspect of her character: she is a bully. How is she a bully?
Like Collins who holds the ball of probability, of voting against the Republicans, Lucy holds the football for Charlie Brown to kick. Then at the very last moment, she snatches her vote away and hands it off to the Republican majority. That is not especially nice of Lucy.
It took John Bolton’s book with the glaring title of The Room Where It Happened to jolt a few senators off of the Donald Trump bus to treachery. They may still be hanging on, but the country can always hope they loosen that iron grip.
Two of the moderate Republican senators indicated that quotes from the former Trump National Security Adviser Bolton made the defense team’s case somewhat weaker. They added that Bolton would be a “relevant” witness.
The Democrats would need to keep all of their Senate votes and convince four additional Republican senators to come over to their side and vote to request witnesses. Some of those might be: Romney, Collins, Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), and Lamar Alexander (R-TN).
Moderate Senator Collins sent out her tweeted statement. She said:
‘Reports about John Bolton’s book strengthen the case for witnesses and have prompted a number of conversations among my colleagues.’
More independent than Republican Murkowski said, according to NBC News:
‘I’ve said before I’m curious about what Ambassador Bolton might have to say. I’m still curious.’
The former Massachusetts governor and presidential candidate Senator Mitt Romney (R-UT) noted that calling witnesses was “increasingly likely:”
‘I think, with the story (about Bolton’s book) that came out yesterday, it’s increasingly apparent that it would be important to hear from John Bolton.’
Romney told reporters that he hasn’t fully made up his mind on calling witnesses, but what Bolton has to say is “relevant” and “therefore I’d like to hear it.”
‘I think it’s increasingly likely that other Republicans will join those of us who think we should hear from John Bolton. I’ve spoken with others who’ve opined upon this as well.’
Most subservient to Donald Trump, Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said:
‘I want to know what’s in the manuscript. Yeah I think that’s important. ‘We’re not going to get part of it, we’re going to get all of it.’
Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) said on Fox & Friends that should the Democrats call witnesses, the president should also hear from the witnesses he wanted:
‘it’s [Bolton’s book] certainly going to sell a lot of [copies.]Listen, I can’t tell from the New York Times report what is actually being reported here,” he said. “I can’t tell if this is something new. I can’t tell if they’ve actually seen the manuscript. It’s all a bunch of hearsay and clearly it’s an attempt to try to influence the course of the trial.’
Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) also spoke on Fox & Friends. He hinted broadly that “the timing” of Bolton’s manuscript was “a little interesting, isn’t it?” Then, he said:
‘[It is] different than what we’ve already heard, and as I said, no crimes were alleged and these events never actually occurred, the withholding of aid and the investigations.’
The Mueller Report Adventures: In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page. These quick, two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people. Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery. Interestingly enough, Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order.


bipartisanreport--2020-01-27--GOP Leader Has Anti-Semitic Impeachment Meltdown

The impeachment of President Donald Trump has given many Republicans cover to reveal their true natures as relentless partisans — and anti-Semites , apparently .
A now former leader of the Delaware Republican Party had an anti-Semitic meltdown on Facebook over Trump ’ s impeachment , lambasting the Jews who have supposedly driven the proceedings .
Then-Sussex County Republican Party Vice-Chairwoman Nelly Jordan ranted against “ Jews ‘ In Name Only ' ” who apparently double as “ left socialist believers ” who have — in Jordan ’ s completely false description — concocted the impeachment charges out of thin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leaders voted her off their county board .
But that removal didn ’ t happen before she made her anti-Semitism abundantly clear .
In her original Facebook rant , she went on to use disturbingly apocalyptic language in her tirade against the Jews who have dared to support Trump ’ s impeachment .
She railed : So God is now going to what , rain down fire from heaven on those who dare to oppose Trump ?
Is that the idea ?
This is the outrageous length to which some of the president @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his actions .
Jordan ’ s comments mirror the completely unhinged tirade that recently circulated around the internet in which Trump ’ s spiritual adviser Paula White publicly shouted a prayer for “ Satanic pregnancies ” to end in miscarriages .
‘ We declare that any strange winds that have been sent to hurt the church , sent against this nation , sent against our president… we break them… In the name of Jesus , we declare all Satanic pregnancies to miscarry right now .
We declare that anything that ’ s been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ ll miscarry.
’ In other words , these people are off the rails .
( That same rant included White denouncing the , uh , “ marine kingdom.
” What , did she eat spoiled fish or something ? )
For her part , Delaware ’ s Nelly Jordan attempted an apology .
She shared , in part : The Republican National Committee tried to distance itself from her remarks .
It told CNN : But in reality , we can all see what they ’ re actually doing .
The completely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ go well on from the above .
For example , Republican members of Congress have compared Trump ’ s impeachment to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and the trial of Jesus , among other wild assertions .
They ’ ve asked observers to essentially completely deny what they see play out right in front of them and believe their contrary assertions that — among other things — actually , the president didn ’ t mean it when he publicly pronounced that foreign countries should look into his opponents and thereby possibly help @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the ongoing days of the public Senate impeachment trial , Americans are getting to examine the situation for themselves .

The impeachment of President Donald Trump has given many Republicans cover to reveal their true natures as relentless partisans — and anti-Semites, apparently. A now former leader of the Delaware Republican Party had an anti-Semitic meltdown on Facebook over Trump’s impeachment, lambasting the Jews who have supposedly driven the proceedings. Then-Sussex County Republican Party Vice-Chairwoman Nelly Jordan ranted against “Jews ‘In Name Only'” who apparently double as “left socialist believers” who have — in Jordan’s completely false description — concocted the impeachment charges out of thin air. Now, her fellow Republican leaders voted her off their county board.
But that removal didn’t happen before she made her anti-Semitism abundantly clear. In her original Facebook rant, she went on to use disturbingly apocalyptic language in her tirade against the Jews who have dared to support Trump’s impeachment. She railed:
‘God please have mercy on them, some of the Jewish people are doing today as it was in the times of the Old Testament, go against God’s will even after He had mercy on them.’
So God is now going to what, rain down fire from heaven on those who dare to oppose Trump? Is that the idea?
This is the outrageous length to which some of the president’s defenders have gone to justify his actions. Jordan’s comments mirror the completely unhinged tirade that recently circulated around the internet in which Trump’s spiritual adviser Paula White publicly shouted a prayer for “Satanic pregnancies” to end in miscarriages.
She belted out:
‘We declare that any strange winds that have been sent to hurt the church, sent against this nation, sent against our president… we break them… In the name of Jesus, we declare all Satanic pregnancies to miscarry right now. We declare that anything that’s been conceived in Satanic wombs, that it’ll miscarry.’
“We command all satanic pregnancies to miscarry right now” — Special Adviser to the White House Faith and Opportunity Initiative Paula White pic.twitter.com/gtdZyGfkxy — Guthrie Graves-Fitzsimmons (@GuthrieGF) January 25, 2020
In other words, these people are off the rails. (That same rant included White denouncing the, uh, “marine kingdom.” What, did she eat spoiled fish or something?)
For her part, Delaware’s Nelly Jordan attempted an apology. She shared, in part:
‘No matter how heated our collective discourse becomes, it should never cross the line as I did.’
The Republican National Committee tried to distance itself from her remarks. It told CNN:
‘We condemn hateful, anti-Semitic comments in the strongest possible terms. There’s no place for them in the Republican Party.’
But in reality, we can all see what they’re actually doing.
The completely bonkers attempts at defenses for the president go well on from the above. For example, Republican members of Congress have compared Trump’s impeachment to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and the trial of Jesus, among other wild assertions. They’ve asked observers to essentially completely deny what they see play out right in front of them and believe their contrary assertions that — among other things — actually, the president didn’t mean it when he publicly pronounced that foreign countries should look into his opponents and thereby possibly help him win the 2020 election. With the ongoing days of the public Senate impeachment trial, Americans are getting to examine the situation for themselves.


bipartisanreport--2020-01-27--Rudy Giuliani Goes Full Stupid Over Bolton Revelations

Rudy Giuliani is an interesting character who has been lurking around the edges of the Donald Trump realm .
He has stood in the shadows playing a bigger part than people realize .
Indeed , he might be described as a manipulator of the deep state or even the guardian of the swamp .
Former conservative presidential candidate Pat Buchanan once said according to The New York Times : Former Missouri Senator and MSNBC contributor Claire McCaskill said : Of course , Trump may have been the one who killed the frog or perhaps , Giuliani .
The former New @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ LouDobbs There is no way in the world President Trump would say this to John Bolton .
It ’ s a shame that a man will sacrifice his integrity to make a few bucks on a book .
No wonder he accomplished so little as National Security Advisor.
’ Senior ABC producer John Santucci tweeted that the former mayor said Bolton “ wasn ’ t man enough ” to confront Giuliani : ‘ More from Rudy – “ He [ Bolton ] never once expressed concern to me .
If he had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it to him…..He [ Bolton ] wasn ’ t man enough to just ask and instead makes false and irresponsible barges to write a book about his failed career.
’ Twitter world went over the top .
Take a look at what they had to say and have a laugh or two : The Mueller Report Adventures : In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page .
These quick , two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people .
Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery .
Interestingly enough @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any order .

Rudy Giuliani is an interesting character who has been lurking around the edges of the Donald Trump realm. He has stood in the shadows playing a bigger part than people realize. Indeed, he might be described as a manipulator of the deep state or even the guardian of the swamp.
Former conservative presidential candidate Pat Buchanan once said according to The New York Times:
‘[T]his swamp: it’s a protected wetland; they [politicians] breed in it, they spawn in it.’
Former Missouri Senator and MSNBC contributor Claire McCaskill said:
‘You can believe Dead frog before you can believe Trump.’
Of course, Trump may have been the one who killed the frog or perhaps, Giuliani. The former New York City mayor tweeted:
‘.@LouDobbs There is no way in the world President Trump would say this to John Bolton. It’s a shame that a man will sacrifice his integrity to make a few bucks on a book. No wonder he accomplished so little as National Security Advisor.’
Senior ABC producer John Santucci tweeted that the former mayor said Bolton “wasn’t man enough” to confront Giuliani:
‘More from Rudy – “He [Bolton] never once expressed concern to me. If he had confronted me, I could have explained it to him…..He [Bolton] wasn’t man enough to just ask and instead makes false and irresponsible barges to write a book about his failed career.’
Twitter world went over the top. Take a look at what they had to say and have a laugh or two:
The Mueller Report Adventures: In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page. These quick, two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people. Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery. Interestingly enough, Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order.


bipartisanreport--2020-01-27--Trump Goes Into Tailspin Mode During Afternoon Trial Rant

One of Donald Trump ’ s attorneys stood up in front of the Senate .
What made her remarkable was so many sighs that we wanted to write her a hall pass .
She would have been excused for extreme boredom .
All of the president ’ s men and one woman stood up and tried to make a case for exonerating POTUS .
Most of them paused the rate of speaking to something that reminded us of the old 33 1/2 rpm ( revolutions per minute ) speed records .
The flip side of that rate would have been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chipmunks , Chip and Dale on speed .
A solemn tone is important , but these presentations did not carry solemnity .
Instead , they reminded people of the kids in high school marching bands who could not tell time .
That meant they were always a beat off .
The attorneys might have been the high school first-year accounting teacher .
As much as the country has been paying for the president ’ s defense , surely they should have served him better .
Trump tweeted again and did not invite people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , he commanded the Democrats to do so : Then , the president or one of his aides typed a reminder of the International Holocaust Remembrance Day .
If the message was his , it might have been one of his best .
Twitter world went crazy after Trump tweeted in spite of most attorneys ’ wishes that their client remain silent .
Take a few moments for a laugh break : The Mueller Report Adventures : In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page .
These quick , two-minute reads interpret the report in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery .
Interestingly enough , Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order .

One of Donald Trump’s attorneys stood up in front of the Senate. What made her remarkable was so many sighs that we wanted to write her a hall pass. She would have been excused for extreme boredom.
All of the president’s men and one woman stood up and tried to make a case for exonerating POTUS. Most of them paused the rate of speaking to something that reminded us of the old 33 1/2 rpm (revolutions per minute) speed records. The flip side of that rate would have been the old 78 rpm speed of the chipmunks, Chip and Dale on speed.
A solemn tone is important, but these presentations did not carry solemnity. Instead, they reminded people of the kids in high school marching bands who could not tell time. That meant they were always a beat off. The attorneys might have been the high school first-year accounting teacher. As much as the country has been paying for the president’s defense, surely they should have served him better.
Trump tweeted again and did not invite people to watch the live trial. No, he commanded the Democrats to do so:
‘All Democrats should watch this!’
All Democrats should watch this! pic.twitter.com/WFK33pR0Lv — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 26, 2020
Then, the president or one of his aides typed a reminder of the International Holocaust Remembrance Day. If the message was his, it might have been one of his best.
‘On International Holocaust Remembrance Day, we remember the millions of precious souls who perished as a result of the horrific crimes perpetrated by the Nazi regime….’
Then, Trump included several additional news feeds:
Twitter world went crazy after Trump tweeted in spite of most attorneys’ wishes that their client remain silent. Take a few moments for a laugh break:
The Mueller Report Adventures: In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page. These quick, two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people. Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery. Interestingly enough, Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order.


bipartisanreport--2020-01-27--White House Devolves Into Chaos After Bolton Excerpts

Who is a person to believe — Donald Trump or his former National Security Adviser John ( the mustache ) Bolton ?
Let us see , on one hand we have an orange man in makeup who has told over 16,000+ lies so far .
On the other hand , we have a “ nasty , brutish ” and terse albeit traditional man , according to the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace .
Trump ’ s impeachment case defense has hung upon one of the president ’ s claims .
According to the president , he informed Bolton that freeing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the war-torn Ukrainians had nothing to do with the investigation into his political opponents .
Bolton ’ s leaked transcript said otherwise .
Trump tweeted a rash of messages in the middle of the night .
He was accusing Bolton of saying this to promote his new book .
POTUS ’ feelings were still sore from being only the third president in history to be impeached .
On the eve of the Republicans ’ opening statement , The New York Times broke the news that Bolton ’ s book transcript , The Room @ @ @ @ @ @ @ argument against his former national security advisor : The Times ’ jarring news was in direct odds with the White House ’ s attorneys ’ and Trump ’ s private attorneys ’ main premise : Trump did not tie the military aid to his 2020 presidential contender former Vice President Joe Biden investigations .
Bolton ’ s attorney said that he gave the White House a copy of Bolton ’ s manuscript for review seeking classified information , which has always been the process .
The seven House impeachment managers ( aka attorneys @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bolton has offered to testify before the Senate with a subpoena , the Senate Republicans have remained steadfast in their halt of trial witnesses .
Why ?
Good question , because a trial without witnesses and evidence can not really be called a trial .
It would merely be a lawyerly presentation .
The former national security adviser has said he had relevant information to the ongoing impeachment proceedings and that he would comply with a Senate subpoena .
Bolton worked for Trump from April 2018 to September 2019 .
Eventually , he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ play nice with all the White House sycophants or suck up to the boss .
Trump warned that he would invoke executive privilege and block Bolton ’ s testimony .
Twitter world had fun with POTUS ’ tweets .
Enjoy some of our favorites below : The Mueller Report Adventures : In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page .
These quick , two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people .
Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery .
Interestingly enough , Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in @ @ @

Who is a person to believe — Donald Trump or his former National Security Adviser John (the mustache) Bolton? Let us see, on one hand we have an orange man in makeup who has told over 16,000+ lies so far. On the other hand, we have a “nasty, brutish” and terse albeit traditional man, according to the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Trump’s impeachment case defense has hung upon one of the president’s claims. According to the president, he informed Bolton that freeing the $391 million military aid for the war-torn Ukrainians had nothing to do with the investigation into his political opponents. Bolton’s leaked transcript said otherwise.
Trump tweeted a rash of messages in the middle of the night. He was accusing Bolton of saying this to promote his new book. POTUS’ feelings were still sore from being only the third president in history to be impeached.
On the eve of the Republicans’ opening statement, The New York Times broke the news that Bolton’s book transcript, The Room Where It Happened:
‘…Trump said during an August meeting that he wanted to continue a freeze on the nearly $400 million in security aid for Ukraine until the government there agreed to investigate Biden and other Democrats.’
Trump tweeted his argument against his former national security advisor:
‘I NEVER told John Bolton that the aid to Ukraine was tied to investigations into Democrats, including the Bidens. In fact, he never complained about this at the time of his very public termination. If John Bolton said this, it was only to sell a book. With that being said, the…’
The Times’ jarring news was in direct odds with the White House’s attorneys’ and Trump’s private attorneys’ main premise: Trump did not tie the military aid to his 2020 presidential contender former Vice President Joe Biden investigations.
Bolton’s attorney said that he gave the White House a copy of Bolton’s manuscript for review seeking classified information, which has always been the process. The seven House impeachment managers (aka attorneys) released this statement:
‘There is no defensible reason to wait until his book is published, when the information he has to offer is critical to the most important decision Senators must now make — whether to convict the President of impeachable offenses.’
Even though Bolton has offered to testify before the Senate with a subpoena, the Senate Republicans have remained steadfast in their halt of trial witnesses. Why? Good question, because a trial without witnesses and evidence cannot really be called a trial. It would merely be a lawyerly presentation.
The former national security adviser has said he had relevant information to the ongoing impeachment proceedings and that he would comply with a Senate subpoena.
Bolton worked for Trump from April 2018 to September 2019. Eventually, he was fired, because he could not play nice with all the White House sycophants or suck up to the boss.
Trump warned that he would invoke executive privilege and block Bolton’s testimony.
Twitter world had fun with POTUS’ tweets. Enjoy some of our favorites below:
The Mueller Report Adventures: In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page. These quick, two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people. Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery. Interestingly enough, Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order.