bipartisanreport--2020-12-11--N.Y. Attorney General Pulls Power Move To Fight Texas SCOTUS Lawsuit

New York Attorney General Letitia James has joined 21 other state/ territory Attorney Generals and the Attorney General for Washington D.C. in a filing against the recent Texas lawsuit that seeks the invalidation of the presidential election results in four key swing states , all of which Biden won .
On Twitter , James insisted that the people ’ s “ voices will be heard.
” She commented as follows : Texas alleged that the states under consideration improperly changed their election procedures because updates went through state courts and other officials outside of formal state legislative bodies .
As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ position noted , they ’ re essentially asking the U.S. Supreme Court ( where the case is filed ) to meddle in states ’ interpretations of their own state laws .
The coalition of Attorney Generals behind the recent filing against Texas ’ s position also explained how the demand in the Constitution for state legislatures to handle election-related policy-making doesn ’ t confine this policy-making to the legislative bodies currently in place .
Instead , the point is for whoever happens to set official policy in respective states to handle electoral policy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , what meaningful role would state courts even have ?
They ’ re supposed to be checks on the legislative bodies , not pushed to the side .
President Donald Trump has asked Sen. Ted Cruz ( R-Texas ) to argue the Texas case before the Supreme Court if the court agrees to hear arguments in the proceedings , and Cruz has apparently agreed .
( Trump sought to join the case in support of Texas ’ s position . )
There ’ s no particular indication that the court will actually rule @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no matter the current presence of three of Trump ’ s own nominees on the bench .
Just recently , the court rejected a challenge to election results in Pennsylvania from Republicans in the state , and across the country , Trump-allied legal challenges against the election results have failed in front of conservative and liberal judges alike .
Check out Twitter ’ s response to James below :

New York Attorney General Letitia James has joined 21 other state/ territory Attorney Generals and the Attorney General for Washington D.C. in a filing against the recent Texas lawsuit that seeks the invalidation of the presidential election results in four key swing states, all of which Biden won.
On Twitter, James insisted that the people’s “voices will be heard.” She commented as follows:
‘I’m taking action at the Supreme Court with a coalition of AGs to fight back against the Texas Attorney General’s baseless attempts to invalidate the #2020Election results in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, and Michigan. The people have spoken, and their voices will be heard.’
I’m taking action at the Supreme Court with a coalition of AGs to fight back against the Texas Attorney General's baseless attempts to invalidate the #2020Election results in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, and Michigan. The people have spoken, and their voices will be heard. — NY AG James (@NewYorkStateAG) December 10, 2020
Texas alleged that the states under consideration improperly changed their election procedures because updates went through state courts and other officials outside of formal state legislative bodies. As a new filing against Texas’s position noted, they’re essentially asking the U.S. Supreme Court (where the case is filed) to meddle in states’ interpretations of their own state laws. The coalition of Attorney Generals behind the recent filing against Texas’s position also explained how the demand in the Constitution for state legislatures to handle election-related policy-making doesn’t confine this policy-making to the legislative bodies currently in place. Instead, the point is for whoever happens to set official policy in respective states to handle electoral policy issues. Under Texas’s theory, what meaningful role would state courts even have? They’re supposed to be checks on the legislative bodies, not pushed to the side.
President Donald Trump has asked Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) to argue the Texas case before the Supreme Court if the court agrees to hear arguments in the proceedings, and Cruz has apparently agreed. (Trump sought to join the case in support of Texas’s position.) There’s no particular indication that the court will actually rule in the GOP’s favor, no matter the current presence of three of Trump’s own nominees on the bench. Just recently, the court rejected a challenge to election results in Pennsylvania from Republicans in the state, and across the country, Trump-allied legal challenges against the election results have failed in front of conservative and liberal judges alike.
Check out Twitter’s response to James below:


bipartisanreport--2020-12-11--PA Attorney General Trolls Team Trump Over Bogus SCOTUS Lawsuit

Trump asked the senator to argue a very special case before the Supreme Court .
Over 100 Republican Representatives joined @ @ @ @ @ election , also known as a daylight coup .
Then , 17 Republican attorney generals @ @ @ @ @ and Trump stood at the end of the line marking which ones were his friends @ @ @ @ @ .
Trump approached Cruz , which did not give him any accolades .
CNN ’ @ @ @ @ @ host Chris Cuomo had asked Pennsylvania ’ s , Attorney General Josh Shapiro ( D @ @ @ @ @ the senator .
This AG is from one of the presidential swing states .
‘ @ @ @ @ @ be neither a genius in the law or a genius , frankly , in terms @ @ @ @ @ is a sad sack .
’

Trump asked the senator to argue a very special case before the Supreme Court. Over 100 Republican Representatives joined a lawsuit to overthrow the election, also known as a daylight coup. Then, 17 Republican attorney generals piled on the suit, and Trump stood at the end of the line marking which ones were his friends and which were his enemies.
Trump approached Cruz, which did not give him any accolades. CNN’s Prime Time‘s host Chris Cuomo had asked Pennsylvania’s, Attorney General Josh Shapiro (D) how he felt about the senator. This AG is from one of the presidential swing states.
Shapiro mocked Cruz:
‘He has proven himself to be neither a genius in the law or a genius, frankly, in terms of an EQ. He is a sad sack.’


bipartisanreport--2020-12-12--Trump Legal Team Responds To SCOTUS Defeat Like Maniacs

Donald Trump has lost the 2020 presidential election .
The incumbent president received only 232 electoral college votes to his challenger , Joe Biden , who received 306 .
Trump ended the election with just over 74,000,000 votes , the highest number of total votes in history except for his challenger ’ s votes , which totaled over 80,000,000 .
All 50 states have certified their elections .
The Supreme Court has refused multiple times to change the outcome for the president .
Clearly , Trump knows that he ’ s lost .
Trump ’ s legal team , however @ @ @ @ @ @ @ $ 20,000 per day to make complete fools of themselves in court and rant to any right-wing media outlet who will listen to them , says that the race still isn ’ t over , even if there does not appear to be another legal avenue left to take .
Top legal advisor to the president , Jenna Ellis , said that “ all three branches of government ” failed in the 2020 elections , but she then mixed state and federal government branches together to somehow explain herself .
She spoke to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s been quarantined after contracting COVID-19 .
Rudy Giuliani , Trump ’ s “ lawyer ” and possibly the most embarrassing person alive , also says that the fight is not done , and that he and Trump are discussing new ways to overturn the democratic process .
Giuliani also spoke to Newsmax from his home , where he ’ s also been quarantined after contracting COVID-19 .
Just as Trump once said that COVID would stay contained to 15 Americans , and that it would go away in the summer , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the public before Election Day , Trump is lying about the election , too , and his lawyers are helping him do it .
Twitter expressed their frustration with Trump and his allies .
Read some of their comments below :

Donald Trump has lost the 2020 presidential election. The incumbent president received only 232 electoral college votes to his challenger, Joe Biden, who received 306. Trump ended the election with just over 74,000,000 votes, the highest number of total votes in history except for his challenger’s votes, which totaled over 80,000,000. All 50 states have certified their elections. The Supreme Court has refused multiple times to change the outcome for the president.
Clearly, Trump knows that he’s lost.
Trump’s legal team, however, who are reportedly billing him around $20,000 per day to make complete fools of themselves in court and rant to any right-wing media outlet who will listen to them, says that the race still isn’t over, even if there does not appear to be another legal avenue left to take.
Um… Jenna Ellis reacting to SCOTUS news says it’s been a “failure across all three branches of government” and says the “executive branch…changed the rules, and we know that…” 🤔 pic.twitter.com/dKt9jsACmJ — Will Steakin (@wsteaks) December 12, 2020
Rudy Giuliani tells Newsmax that Trump pivoted to other options once he heard about the Supreme Court's decision, saying that they may file more cases pic.twitter.com/sXecAvT0Vw — John Whitehouse (@existentialfish) December 12, 2020
Top legal advisor to the president, Jenna Ellis, said that “all three branches of government” failed in the 2020 elections, but she then mixed state and federal government branches together to somehow explain herself. She spoke to Newsmax from her home, where she’s been quarantined after contracting COVID-19.
Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s “lawyer” and possibly the most embarrassing person alive, also says that the fight is not done, and that he and Trump are discussing new ways to overturn the democratic process. Giuliani also spoke to Newsmax from his home, where he’s also been quarantined after contracting COVID-19.
Just as Trump once said that COVID would stay contained to 15 Americans, and that it would go away in the summer, and that a vaccine would be available to the public before Election Day, Trump is lying about the election, too, and his lawyers are helping him do it.
Twitter expressed their frustration with Trump and his allies. Read some of their comments below:


bipartisanreport--2020-12-12--GOP Responds To SCOTUS Defeat Like Treasonous Traitors

On Friday , Donald Trump was still ignoring the nearly 300,000 American lives lost and the citizens left in the wake of the deadliest days in American history and chose instead to advise the Supreme Court on how to rule on his case to overturn the 2020 election and install him as dictator .
He advised them to show wisdom and courage in order to make our electoral process respected again , and for once , he was absolutely right .
The Supreme Court did rule with wisdom and courage , and Donald Trump lost the election yet again .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the state of Texas , brought by the secretary of state there who is currently under investigation by the federal government for taking bribes while in office , saying they had not proven harm to their state caused by swing states whose elections went to Democrat Joe Biden .
To say that Trump ’ s allies and supporters are taking the news badly is the understatement of the year .
As a measure of how deadly serious they are about reinstalling Trump in the White House , the Texas GOP issued a statement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for democracy .
Trump supporters on Twitter displayed all the stages of grief after news of Trump ’ s SCOTUS loss in the case he insisted was “ the big one ” that would surely overturn Biden ’ s win and overturn the will of more than 80 million Americans .
Some of them were in the anger stage , suddenly deciding that a Supreme Court with a 6-3 conservative majority , with three justices appointed by Trump himself , are political operatives working with Democrats to illegally steal the election away from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the rationalization stage , trying to dismiss the court loss by rationalizing that a group of nine Supreme Court justices doesn ’ t know enough about the U.S. Constitution to make an informed decision on this case .
Of course , there remains a large number of Trump supporters in the denial stage of grief , insisting that there are still ways to overturn the election and keep Trump in the White House .
There isn ’ t .
All 50 states have certified their election results and no other cases are pending @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Trump ’ s appeals , it doesn ’ t appear likely that they ’ ll take anymore that come before them seriously , either .
The most frightening Trump supporters , however , are taking the anger stage way too far , promising violence , sedition , and insurrection to reinstall Trump in the White House .
Serious threats to the lives of Supreme Court justices were included , and the worst is likely still to come .
The truth , after all of the controversy , is that Joe Biden won @ @ @ @ @ @ @ continue to protest as long as his witless supporters keep sending him money .
Either way , Biden will be inaugurated on January 20 , 2021 , and Donald Trump ’ s presidency will be the most embarrassing footnote in American history .

On Friday, Donald Trump was still ignoring the nearly 300,000 American lives lost and the citizens left in the wake of the deadliest days in American history and chose instead to advise the Supreme Court on how to rule on his case to overturn the 2020 election and install him as dictator. He advised them to show wisdom and courage in order to make our electoral process respected again, and for once, he was absolutely right. The Supreme Court did rule with wisdom and courage, and Donald Trump lost the election yet again.
The Supreme Court rejected a big by the state of Texas, brought by the secretary of state there who is currently under investigation by the federal government for taking bribes while in office, saying they had not proven harm to their state caused by swing states whose elections went to Democrat Joe Biden.
According to NPR:
‘The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday night rejected an eleventh hour challenge to Joe Biden’s election as president. The court’s action came in a one-page order, which said the complaint was denied “for lack of standing.”‘
To say that Trump’s allies and supporters are taking the news badly is the understatement of the year. As a measure of how deadly serious they are about reinstalling Trump in the White House, the Texas GOP issued a statement suggesting that secession is the best remedy for democracy.
The @TexasGOP is out with a statement in the wake of the Supreme Court decision, all but calling for secession: “Perhaps law-abiding states should bond together and form a Union of states that will abide by the constitution.” pic.twitter.com/4bB3gk88t4 — Adam Kelsey (@adamkelsey) December 12, 2020
Trump supporters on Twitter displayed all the stages of grief after news of Trump’s SCOTUS loss in the case he insisted was “the big one” that would surely overturn Biden’s win and overturn the will of more than 80 million Americans. Some of them were in the anger stage, suddenly deciding that a Supreme Court with a 6-3 conservative majority, with three justices appointed by Trump himself, are political operatives working with Democrats to illegally steal the election away from the Republican president.
Others were in the rationalization stage, trying to dismiss the court loss by rationalizing that a group of nine Supreme Court justices doesn’t know enough about the U.S. Constitution to make an informed decision on this case.
Of course, there remains a large number of Trump supporters in the denial stage of grief, insisting that there are still ways to overturn the election and keep Trump in the White House. There isn’t. All 50 states have certified their election results and no other cases are pending in the SCOTUS. After rejecting two of Trump’s appeals, it doesn’t appear likely that they’ll take anymore that come before them seriously, either.
The most frightening Trump supporters, however, are taking the anger stage way too far, promising violence, sedition, and insurrection to reinstall Trump in the White House. Serious threats to the lives of Supreme Court justices were included, and the worst is likely still to come.
The truth, after all of the controversy, is that Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential election and Trump will continue to protest as long as his witless supporters keep sending him money. Either way, Biden will be inaugurated on January 20, 2021, and Donald Trump’s presidency will be the most embarrassing footnote in American history.


bipartisanreport--2020-12-11--Michigan Supreme Court Rules To Deny Pathetic Trump Appeal

The Michigan Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from the Trump campaign in a case that the president ’ s team brought against the electoral process in the state .
Incredibly , in their original appeal , the campaign asked the court to “ order that designated challengers must be granted meaningful access to observe and review the tabulation and processing of absent voter ballots.
” The Michigan Board of State Canvassers certified the results of the presidential election in the state on November 23 — and the Trump campaign didn ’ t file their appeal with the Michigan Supreme @ @ @ @ @ @ @ weeks later .
Although their appeal covered broader issues as well , why on earth would they include a demand for increased access for observers of the ballot counting process ?
Ballot counting is over !
In an earlier ruling in this same case , a Michigan state court of appeals concluded that the certification of the presidential election results in the state “ clearly rendered plaintiff ’ s claims for relief moot , ” referring to the Trump campaign ’ s demands for action .
That same court observed that current circumstances @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its fraud allegations by way of a recount of the ballots cast in Wayne County , ” rather than via the belated court action that the Trump campaign pursued and courts have rejected .
The Michigan state Supreme Court didn ’ t issue as long of an explanation in its own rejection of the case .
That court simply stated that they were “ not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
” The Trump campaign and its allies have fought against the election results elsewhere — and they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elsewhere .
On Friday , Wisconsin Judge Stephen Simanek rejected a case that the Trump campaign brought against the results in the state , concluding that there is simply “ no credible evidence of misconduct or wide-scale fraud ” in the election .
“ [ The ] court is satisfied the rules and guidelines applied in each of the disputed areas are reasonable , and a correct interpretation of the underlying early absentee voting laws , ” Simanek added , writing that “ the certification of the results of the 2020 Wisconsin presidential @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Milwaukee County recounts , is affirmed.
” The Trump campaign — which promptly rushed to appeal its loss to the Wisconsin Supreme Court — paid for those countywide recounts , which confirmed Biden ’ s win in the state .
The electoral college is slated to meet on Monday , at which time Biden ’ s victory will again get confirmed .
Neither Trump nor his allies have come anywhere close to altering the election outcome .

The Michigan Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from the Trump campaign in a case that the president’s team brought against the electoral process in the state. Incredibly, in their original appeal, the campaign asked the court to “order that designated challengers must be granted meaningful access to observe and review the tabulation and processing of absent voter ballots.” The Michigan Board of State Canvassers certified the results of the presidential election in the state on November 23 — and the Trump campaign didn’t file their appeal with the Michigan Supreme Court until December 7, about two weeks later. Although their appeal covered broader issues as well, why on earth would they include a demand for increased access for observers of the ballot counting process? Ballot counting is over!
🚨BREAKING: Michigan Supreme Court DENIES Trump Campaign appeal to stop the counting of absentee ballots in Michigan. Trump remains 1-56 in post-election litigation.https://t.co/vnn73iKSxz — Marc E. Elias (@marceelias) December 11, 2020
In an earlier ruling in this same case, a Michigan state court of appeals concluded that the certification of the presidential election results in the state “clearly rendered plaintiff’s claims for relief moot,” referring to the Trump campaign’s demands for action. That same court observed that current circumstances “[required] plaintiff to pursue its fraud allegations by way of a recount of the ballots cast in Wayne County,” rather than via the belated court action that the Trump campaign pursued and courts have rejected. The Michigan state Supreme Court didn’t issue as long of an explanation in its own rejection of the case. That court simply stated that they were “not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.”
The Trump campaign and its allies have fought against the election results elsewhere — and they’ve also faced significant court set-backs elsewhere. On Friday, Wisconsin Judge Stephen Simanek rejected a case that the Trump campaign brought against the results in the state, concluding that there is simply “no credible evidence of misconduct or wide-scale fraud” in the election. “[The] court is satisfied the rules and guidelines applied in each of the disputed areas are reasonable, and a correct interpretation of the underlying early absentee voting laws,” Simanek added, writing that “the certification of the results of the 2020 Wisconsin presidential election, after the Dane County and Milwaukee County recounts, is affirmed.” The Trump campaign — which promptly rushed to appeal its loss to the Wisconsin Supreme Court — paid for those countywide recounts, which confirmed Biden’s win in the state.
The electoral college is slated to meet on Monday, at which time Biden’s victory will again get confirmed. Neither Trump nor his allies have come anywhere close to altering the election outcome.


bipartisanreport--2020-12-11--Democrat Demands  GOP Traitors Not Be Seated Via 14th Amendment

Rep. Bill Pascrell , a New Jersey Democrat , has issued a new public statement in which he calls on House leaders to block the seating of any members of the incoming House delegation who presently support Donald Trump ’ s anti-democratic fight against the election results .
Over 120 House Republicans and counting have signed onto a court filing expressing support for a lawsuit from Texas state Attorney General Ken Paxton ( R ) , who is seeking the invalidation of the election outcome in Wisconsin , Michigan , Pennsylvania , and Georgia , all of which Biden won @ @ @ @ @ @ @ legitimate — Republicans have not suddenly come up with legitimate evidence for their case against the election results after dozens of decisive post-election court losses around the country .
‘ Stated simply , men and women who would act to tear the United States government apart can not serve as Members of the Congress .
These lawsuits seeking to obliterate public confidence in our democratic system by invalidating the clear results of the 2020 presidential election undoubtedly attack the text and spirit of the Constitution , which each member swears to support and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you to exercise the power of your offices to evaluate steps you can take to address these Constitutional violations this Congress and , if possible , refuse to seat in the 117th Congress any Members-elect seeking to make Donald Trump an unelected dictator.
’ Check out Rep. Pascrell ’ s statement in full below : The public announcement of Pascrell ’ s call to block Representatives-elect who presently back Trump ’ s fight against the election results notes that the 14th Amendment blocks individuals from serving in Congress who ’ ve engaged in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the amendment ’ s original historical context , the provision originally kept Confederate sympathies out of the federal government in the aftermath of the Civil War , but Pascrell now characterizes the fight against the election outcome as a direct affront against the security of the United States on par with that historical travesty .
“ Trying to overturn a democratic election and install a dictator seems like a pretty clear example of ” apparent “ rebellion against the United States , ” Pascrell noted .
The Texas lawsuit in question targets election-related @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recent presidential election .
Texas and its allies allege that these changes are invalid because they went through officials other than members of formal state legislative bodies , but opponents in the lawsuit , including the Attorney Generals of 22 states and territories , insist that the Constitutional demand for legislatures to handle certain election-related policy matters doesn ’ t confine these matters to formal legislative bodies .
Instead , the point is for whoever happens to set formal policy in respective states to handle the issues , they say .

Rep. Bill Pascrell, a New Jersey Democrat, has issued a new public statement in which he calls on House leaders to block the seating of any members of the incoming House delegation who presently support Donald Trump’s anti-democratic fight against the election results. Over 120 House Republicans and counting have signed onto a court filing expressing support for a lawsuit from Texas state Attorney General Ken Paxton (R), who is seeking the invalidation of the election outcome in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Georgia, all of which Biden won. Paxton’s case is not legitimate — Republicans have not suddenly come up with legitimate evidence for their case against the election results after dozens of decisive post-election court losses around the country.
Pascrell commented as follows, addressing House leaders directly:
‘Stated simply, men and women who would act to tear the United States government apart cannot serve as Members of the Congress. These lawsuits seeking to obliterate public confidence in our democratic system by invalidating the clear results of the 2020 presidential election undoubtedly attack the text and spirit of the Constitution, which each member swears to support and defend. Consequently, I call on you to exercise the power of your offices to evaluate steps you can take to address these Constitutional violations this Congress and, if possible, refuse to seat in the 117th Congress any Members-elect seeking to make Donald Trump an unelected dictator.’
Check out Rep. Pascrell’s statement in full below:
Today I’m calling on House leaders to refuse to seat any Members trying to overturn the election and make donald trump an unelected dictator. pic.twitter.com/icTmGKCpuR — Bill Pascrell, Jr. (@BillPascrell) December 11, 2020
The public announcement of Pascrell’s call to block Representatives-elect who presently back Trump’s fight against the election results notes that the 14th Amendment blocks individuals from serving in Congress who’ve engaged in insurrection against the United States. Considering the amendment’s original historical context, the provision originally kept Confederate sympathies out of the federal government in the aftermath of the Civil War, but Pascrell now characterizes the fight against the election outcome as a direct affront against the security of the United States on par with that historical travesty. “Trying to overturn a democratic election and install a dictator seems like a pretty clear example of” apparent “rebellion against the United States,” Pascrell noted.
The text of the 14th Amendment expressly forbids Members of Congress from engaging in rebellion against the United States. Trying to overturn a democratic election and install a dictator seems like a pretty clear example of that. pic.twitter.com/VMnDfd0sFx — Bill Pascrell, Jr. (@BillPascrell) December 11, 2020
The Texas lawsuit in question targets election-related policy changes that took effect for the recent presidential election. Texas and its allies allege that these changes are invalid because they went through officials other than members of formal state legislative bodies, but opponents in the lawsuit, including the Attorney Generals of 22 states and territories, insist that the Constitutional demand for legislatures to handle certain election-related policy matters doesn’t confine these matters to formal legislative bodies. Instead, the point is for whoever happens to set formal policy in respective states to handle the issues, they say.


bipartisanreport--2020-12-11--Wisconsin Issues 56th Loss To Trump & Allies With Embarrassing Dismissal

Wisconsin Judge Stephen Simanek , who the state Supreme Court appointed to handle a challenge from the Trump team , has newly rejected a Trump campaign lawsuit in which the president ’ s team was seeking to overturn the presidential election results in Wisconsin , where Biden won .
Simanek wrote that “ the court is satisfied the rules and guidelines applied in each of the disputed areas are reasonable , and a correct interpretation of the underlying early absentee voting laws , ” and thus , “ the certification of the results of the 2020 Wisconsin presidential election , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recounts , is affirmed.
” The Trump campaign itself paid for those Dane and Milwaukee County recounts , which cost about $ 3 million and confirmed Biden ’ s win .
Simanek also concluded that there is “ no credible evidence of misconduct or wide-scale fraud , ” which , besides reflecting the conclusions of officials as high-ranking as Attorney General Bill Barr , throws cold water on one of the Trump team ’ s fundamental arguments .
The president and his allies have consistently claimed that the presidential election was plagued by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Biden ’ s victory — but the legitimate evidence for this claim simply isn ’ t there .
Simanek ’ s ruling against Trump emerged shortly after the Wisconsin state Supreme Court rejected a similar Trump campaign challenge to the election results .
A majority of the Justices concluded that the campaign should have started with the circuit court system .
Following that Wisconsin Supreme Court rejection , the Trump legal team filed its challenge with the circuit court system in the state , which culminated in this new failure .
According @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Marc Elias , the failure of Trump ’ s circuit court challenge to the Wisconsin election results is the at least 56th post-election court loss for Trump and his allies .
Elias counts a meager one victory — and these numbers don ’ t exactly indicate a well-supported case against the election results , to say the least .
Wisconsin is the subject of another separate court challenge that the state Attorney General of Texas filed with the U.S. Supreme Court , which has exclusive jurisdiction over court fights between states .
Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ slew of Republican-led states have joined that case in support of Texas ’ s position , while 22 state and territory Attorney Generals and the Attorney General for Washington , D.C. , have joined the case in opposition , besides the opposition from the targeted states themselves .
Texas ’ s side of the case alleges that the targeted states unconstitutionally changed their respective election laws because changes went through state courts and officials other than members of formal legislative bodies , but Texas ’ s opponents tore apart this argument in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they ’ ve explained that there ’ s no legitimate basis for confining substantive election-related policy-making to formal legislative bodies — what substantive role would state courts even have in election-related decision-making , under Texas ’ s theory ?
Courts are supposed to check the other branches of government .

Wisconsin Judge Stephen Simanek, who the state Supreme Court appointed to handle a challenge from the Trump team, has newly rejected a Trump campaign lawsuit in which the president’s team was seeking to overturn the presidential election results in Wisconsin, where Biden won. Simanek wrote that “the court is satisfied the rules and guidelines applied in each of the disputed areas are reasonable, and a correct interpretation of the underlying early absentee voting laws,” and thus, “the certification of the results of the 2020 Wisconsin presidential election, after the Dane County and Milwaukee County recounts, is affirmed.” The Trump campaign itself paid for those Dane and Milwaukee County recounts, which cost about $3 million and confirmed Biden’s win.
🚨🚨BREAKING: Wisconsin Court REJECTS Trump appeal of that state's recount. Trump and his allies are now 1-56.https://t.co/YXiMPxxb6w — Marc E. Elias (@marceelias) December 11, 2020
Simanek also concluded that there is “no credible evidence of misconduct or wide-scale fraud,” which, besides reflecting the conclusions of officials as high-ranking as Attorney General Bill Barr, throws cold water on one of the Trump team’s fundamental arguments. The president and his allies have consistently claimed that the presidential election was plagued by nationwide fraud, which is supposedly responsible for Biden’s victory — but the legitimate evidence for this claim simply isn’t there.
Simanek’s ruling against Trump emerged shortly after the Wisconsin state Supreme Court rejected a similar Trump campaign challenge to the election results. A majority of the Justices concluded that the campaign should have started with the circuit court system. Following that Wisconsin Supreme Court rejection, the Trump legal team filed its challenge with the circuit court system in the state, which culminated in this new failure. According to the tally of voting rights lawyer Marc Elias, the failure of Trump’s circuit court challenge to the Wisconsin election results is the at least 56th post-election court loss for Trump and his allies. Elias counts a meager one victory — and these numbers don’t exactly indicate a well-supported case against the election results, to say the least.
Wisconsin is the subject of another separate court challenge that the state Attorney General of Texas filed with the U.S. Supreme Court, which has exclusive jurisdiction over court fights between states. Trump’s own legal team and a slew of Republican-led states have joined that case in support of Texas’s position, while 22 state and territory Attorney Generals and the Attorney General for Washington, D.C., have joined the case in opposition, besides the opposition from the targeted states themselves.
Texas’s side of the case alleges that the targeted states unconstitutionally changed their respective election laws because changes went through state courts and officials other than members of formal legislative bodies, but Texas’s opponents tore apart this argument in a recently filed response. In short, they’ve explained that there’s no legitimate basis for confining substantive election-related policy-making to formal legislative bodies — what substantive role would state courts even have in election-related decision-making, under Texas’s theory? Courts are supposed to check the other branches of government.


bipartisanreport--2020-12-12--Trump Screams About Imaginary Fraud In Saturday Afternoon Freakout

This weekend , President Donald Trump has continued his self-obsessed fight against the election results .
On Friday , the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit in which Texas and its allies sought to invalidate the election outcome in Wisconsin , Michigan , Pennsylvania , and Georgia , all of which Biden won — and Trump isn ’ t taking the rejection very well , to say the least .
His own three appointees were among the justices who concluded that Texas and its allies ( including Trump ’ s own team ) didn ’ t even have the legal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on Twitter this Saturday , Trump angrily alleged that the “ Supreme Court had ZERO interest in the merits of the greatest voter fraud ever perpetrated on the United States of America , ” which is simply a grossly inaccurate characterization of the situation .
‘ The Supreme Court had ZERO interest in the merits of the greatest voter fraud ever perpetrated on the United States of America .
All they were interested in is “ standing ” , which makes it very difficult for the President to present a case on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reality , there is no legitimate evidence for Trump ’ s claim that systematic fraud plagued the presidential election — the Department of Homeland Security , Attorney General Bill Barr , and local election officials around the country have all confirmed as much .
Trump ’ s insistence that the Supreme Court didn ’ t even consider the core of the Texas case is not correct — they looked at the issues , and seven out of nine justices concluded , as mentioned , that Texas ’ s side didn ’ t have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Texas ’ s claim that it did have a judicially meaningful stake in how other states handled their own elections sat at the core of its original filing .
The two justices who concluded that Texas ’ s side did have the standing to bring their case said that they still wouldn ’ t have given the plaintiffs the relief that they wanted , meaning the invalidation of Biden ’ s win in those states .
On Twitter this Saturday , Trump also complained about signature verification in Georgia .
Referring to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Loeffler , Trump ranted that if “ failing Governor [ Brian Kemp ] would allow signature verification , David & Kelly would WIN !
” which grossly misrepresents the situation .
Signature verification for mail-in ballots in Georgia is already enforced .
Trump has sought re-verifications of mail-in ballots , but meaningful re-checks of actual ballots are physically impossible because election workers separate ballots and envelopes ( with the signatures ) after initial verification .
Nevertheless , Kemp has supported re-checking the envelopes on their own anyway — but Trump won ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ apparently .
Instead , he ’ s just pretending like Kemp is blocking signature verification in general .

This weekend, President Donald Trump has continued his self-obsessed fight against the election results. On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit in which Texas and its allies sought to invalidate the election outcome in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Georgia, all of which Biden won — and Trump isn’t taking the rejection very well, to say the least. His own three appointees were among the justices who concluded that Texas and its allies (including Trump’s own team) didn’t even have the legal standing to bring their case, but on Twitter this Saturday, Trump angrily alleged that the “Supreme Court had ZERO interest in the merits of the greatest voter fraud ever perpetrated on the United States of America,” which is simply a grossly inaccurate characterization of the situation.
Trump tweeted as follows:
‘The Supreme Court had ZERO interest in the merits of the greatest voter fraud ever perpetrated on the United States of America. All they were interested in is “standing”, which makes it very difficult for the President to present a case on the merits. 75,000,000 votes!’
The Supreme Court had ZERO interest in the merits of the greatest voter fraud ever perpetrated on the United States of America. All they were interested in is “standing”, which makes it very difficult for the President to present a case on the merits. 75,000,000 votes! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 12, 2020
In reality, there is no legitimate evidence for Trump’s claim that systematic fraud plagued the presidential election — the Department of Homeland Security, Attorney General Bill Barr, and local election officials around the country have all confirmed as much. Trump’s insistence that the Supreme Court didn’t even consider the core of the Texas case is not correct — they looked at the issues, and seven out of nine justices concluded, as mentioned, that Texas’s side didn’t have the legal standing to bring their case. Texas’s claim that it did have a judicially meaningful stake in how other states handled their own elections sat at the core of its original filing. The two justices who concluded that Texas’s side did have the standing to bring their case said that they still wouldn’t have given the plaintiffs the relief that they wanted, meaning the invalidation of Biden’s win in those states.
On Twitter this Saturday, Trump also complained about signature verification in Georgia. Referring to GOP Senate candidates David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler, Trump ranted that if “failing Governor [Brian Kemp] would allow signature verification, David & Kelly would WIN!” which grossly misrepresents the situation. Signature verification for mail-in ballots in Georgia is already enforced. Trump has sought re-verifications of mail-in ballots, but meaningful re-checks of actual ballots are physically impossible because election workers separate ballots and envelopes (with the signatures) after initial verification. Nevertheless, Kemp has supported re-checking the envelopes on their own anyway — but Trump won’t even give him credit for that, apparently. Instead, he’s just pretending like Kemp is blocking signature verification in general.
Check out Trump’s posts below:
If failing Governor @BrianKempGA would allow signature verification, David & Kelly would WIN! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 12, 2020
Check out Twitter’s response below:


bipartisanreport--2020-12-12--Wisconsin Court Hands Trump Allies 58th Defeat In Saturday Dismissal

President Donald Trump has now earned the at least 58th post-election court loss for himself and his allies , according to the tally of voting rights lawyer Marc Elias .
A Wisconsin federal court has rejected a lawsuit that Trump ’ s team brought over the election results in the state .
Trump sought to have the election outcome ’ s fate essentially handed to the Wisconsin legislature , who Trump ’ s legal team apparently wanted to appoint the members of the electoral college for the state regardless of the Wisconsin popular vote outcome .
The Wisconsin federal court @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wisconsin authorities had “ violated his rights under the Electors Clause ” of the Constitution .
The court wrote , in part , as follows : ‘ In argument , counsel made plain that plaintiff wants the Court to declare the election a failure , with the results discarded , and the door thus opened for the Wisconsin Legislature to appoint Presidential Electors in some fashion other than by following the certified voting results… the Court now… concludes that plaintiff has not proved that defendants violated his rights under the Electors Clause .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wisconsin ’ s Presidential Electors are being determined in the very manner directed by the Legislature , as required by Article II , Section 1 of the Constitution.
’ Originally , the Trump team had claimed that officials in Wisconsin had gone too far off course from rules set by the state legislature , therefore supposedly violating the Constitutional demand for the appointment of members of the electoral college to follow state legislative provisions .
In reality , the court wrote that the issues that the Trump campaign raised didn ’ t even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its members of the electoral college .
The state , like others around the nation , appoints its electoral college members according to the results of the popular vote , with the winner getting the state ’ s electoral college members ahead of the college ’ s meeting to finalize the presidential selection process , which this year is slated for Monday .
Trump ’ s team complained about election administration practices in the state like the usage of drop boxes for absentee ballots , not the actual mechanism by which the members @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appointed .
Critically , the court added that they wouldn ’ t accept the Trump team ’ s arguments even if they did accept the premise that election administration complaints fall under complaints about the method of selecting each state ’ s electoral college members .
Officials “ acted consistently with , and as expressly authorized by , the Wisconsin Legislature , ” the court said , and election-related policy guidance from the Wisconsin Elections Commission “ was not a significant or material departure from legislative direction .
”

President Donald Trump has now earned the at least 58th post-election court loss for himself and his allies, according to the tally of voting rights lawyer Marc Elias. A Wisconsin federal court has rejected a lawsuit that Trump’s team brought over the election results in the state. Trump sought to have the election outcome’s fate essentially handed to the Wisconsin legislature, who Trump’s legal team apparently wanted to appoint the members of the electoral college for the state regardless of the Wisconsin popular vote outcome. The Wisconsin federal court concluded that Trump failed to prove that Wisconsin authorities had “violated his rights under the Electors Clause” of the Constitution.
🚨🚨BREAKING: Wisconsin Federal Court DISMISSES Trump lawsuit WITH PREJUDICE. "This Court has allowed plaintiff the chance to make his case and he has lost on the merits." Trump and his allies are now 1-58 in post-election litigation.https://t.co/LfKb2PUIkq — Marc E. Elias (@marceelias) December 12, 2020
The court wrote, in part, as follows:
‘In argument, counsel made plain that plaintiff wants the Court to declare the election a failure, with the results discarded, and the door thus opened for the Wisconsin Legislature to appoint Presidential Electors in some fashion other than by following the certified voting results… the Court now… concludes that plaintiff has not proved that defendants violated his rights under the Electors Clause. To the contrary, the record shows Wisconsin’s Presidential Electors are being determined in the very manner directed by the Legislature, as required by Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution.’
Originally, the Trump team had claimed that officials in Wisconsin had gone too far off course from rules set by the state legislature, therefore supposedly violating the Constitutional demand for the appointment of members of the electoral college to follow state legislative provisions. In reality, the court wrote that the issues that the Trump campaign raised didn’t even cover the way in which Wisconsin appointed its members of the electoral college.
The state, like others around the nation, appoints its electoral college members according to the results of the popular vote, with the winner getting the state’s electoral college members ahead of the college’s meeting to finalize the presidential selection process, which this year is slated for Monday. Trump’s team complained about election administration practices in the state like the usage of drop boxes for absentee ballots, not the actual mechanism by which the members of the electoral college for Wisconsin are appointed.
Critically, the court added that they wouldn’t accept the Trump team’s arguments even if they did accept the premise that election administration complaints fall under complaints about the method of selecting each state’s electoral college members. Officials “acted consistently with, and as expressly authorized by, the Wisconsin Legislature,” the court said, and election-related policy guidance from the Wisconsin Elections Commission “was not a significant or material departure from legislative direction.”


bipartisanreport--2020-12-12--E. Jean Carroll Taunts Trump Over Post-Election Sex Assault Case

On Friday , writer E. Jean Carroll , who has revealed a story of sexual assault perpetrated by Donald Trump , publicly called out the outgoing president on Twitter , spotlighting the hollowness of Trump ’ s so-called defense in a defamation case that Carroll brought against him .
Throughout the proceedings , Trump and his legal team have worked feverishly to try and essentially draw the case to a close .
At a Friday hearing , Carroll ’ s attorney Joshua Matz said that Trump ’ s tactics reek of “ desperation ” and “ fear.
” On Twitter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Recently , Trump ’ s legal team requested a complete halt to proceedings while Trump appeals federal Judge Lewis Kaplan ’ s denial of a Justice Department attempt to replace Trump as the plaintiff in the case .
They want taxpayer-funded government resources to back up the defense in a case over Trump ’ s destructive personal behavior .
The Justice Department had argued that Trump made disparaging comments about Carroll in his official capacity as president , but Kaplan rejected this assertion .
The judge insisted that to accept the Justice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ concerned official matters and should therefore be under their purview “ would require the Court to adopt a view that virtually everything the president does is within the public interest by virtue of his office.
” Kaplan said that the Trump administration “ provided no support for that theory ” that the court would need to adopt in order to grant their demand .
Check out Twitter ’ s response to Carroll below :

On Friday, writer E. Jean Carroll, who has revealed a story of sexual assault perpetrated by Donald Trump, publicly called out the outgoing president on Twitter, spotlighting the hollowness of Trump’s so-called defense in a defamation case that Carroll brought against him. Throughout the proceedings, Trump and his legal team have worked feverishly to try and essentially draw the case to a close. At a Friday hearing, Carroll’s attorney Joshua Matz said that Trump’s tactics reek of “desperation” and “fear.”
On Twitter this Friday, Carroll commented as follows:
‘For a man who denies he sexually assaulted me, [Donald Trump] is paying his lawyers an awful lot of money to shut me up & shut down my case. Today my attorney, [Joshua Matz], chopped them into tiny tiny tiny shreds.’
For a man who denies he sexually assaulted me, @realDonaldTrump is paying his lawyers an awful lot of money to shut me up & shut down my case. Today my attorney, @JoshuaMatz8, chopped them into tiny tiny tiny shreds.https://t.co/v6hs3Q25VG — E. Jean Carroll (@ejeancarroll) December 11, 2020
Recently, Trump’s legal team requested a complete halt to proceedings while Trump appeals federal Judge Lewis Kaplan’s denial of a Justice Department attempt to replace Trump as the plaintiff in the case. They want taxpayer-funded government resources to back up the defense in a case over Trump’s destructive personal behavior.
The Justice Department had argued that Trump made disparaging comments about Carroll in his official capacity as president, but Kaplan rejected this assertion. The judge insisted that to accept the Justice Department’s argument that the case concerned official matters and should therefore be under their purview “would require the Court to adopt a view that virtually everything the president does is within the public interest by virtue of his office.” Kaplan said that the Trump administration “provided no support for that theory” that the court would need to adopt in order to grant their demand.
Check out Twitter’s response to Carroll below:


bipartisanreport--2020-12-12--Singer Forgets Words To ‘God Bless America’ At Saturday Trump Rally

On Saturday , some of Trump ’ s most fervent supporters rallied in Washington , D.C. , for an event called the Jericho March , where participants planned to march around key buildings in Washington , D.C. , in reference to the Old Testament story in which Israelites march around the ancient city of Jericho in an attempt to conquer the place .
If that description wasn ’ t enough of an alarm bell , once the event got underway , proceedings took a decidedly bizarre turn .
An actual Catholic exorcist spoke at the event , delivering an impassioned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that those on hand evidently believe to be at work .
The implication that the electoral process sending Joe Biden to the White House is somehow the work of demons is just unhinged .
At another point during the proceedings , a woman spoke from the stage while holding a hammer and ranting about a supposed “ super-computer ” called “ The Hammer , ” which Trump allies have alleged worked to fraudulently prop up Biden ’ s vote totals during the election .
There is no actual legitimate evidence that a super-computer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Biden ’ s totals — but this fact didn ’ t stop the rally speaker from hitting a podium with her hammer and asking rally participants to shout “ No King but Jesus !
” anyway .
She said as follows : ‘ We are going to respond to the Dominion voting machines , and the supercomputer called “ The Hammer , ” but we ’ re going to come with a different spirit today , and I ’ m going to hammer this podium with my hammer , and when I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to shout : “ No King but Jesus !
” Watch footage of the cultish nonsense below : Televangelist Mark Burns also spoke at the event .
While yelling , he insisted that the “ Jericho walls must come down !
” He ( loudly ) added as follows : ‘ This is what I learned about witchcraft .
You got ta tell a witch ; you got ta look ’ em right in the eye and say : I ’ m coming after you !
This is your last day !
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you cursed against our president and against our nation is gon na double-fold back on your head !
… These are our devils !
And we will kill them now !
’ In short , this speaker at rally proceedings that Trump himself lauded on Twitter is characterizing “ devils ” that must be “ killed ” as responsible for political developments that he doesn ’ t like .
Check out the cultish nonsense below : At one particularly laughable moment , retired General Michael Flynn ’ s sister appeared on stage , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ words of “ God Bless America.
” Check out the footage below :

On Saturday, some of Trump’s most fervent supporters rallied in Washington, D.C., for an event called the Jericho March, where participants planned to march around key buildings in Washington, D.C., in reference to the Old Testament story in which Israelites march around the ancient city of Jericho in an attempt to conquer the place. If that description wasn’t enough of an alarm bell, once the event got underway, proceedings took a decidedly bizarre turn. An actual Catholic exorcist spoke at the event, delivering an impassioned prayer from the stage against demonic forces that those on hand evidently believe to be at work. The implication that the electoral process sending Joe Biden to the White House is somehow the work of demons is just unhinged.
At another point during the proceedings, a woman spoke from the stage while holding a hammer and ranting about a supposed “super-computer” called “The Hammer,” which Trump allies have alleged worked to fraudulently prop up Biden’s vote totals during the election. There is no actual legitimate evidence that a super-computer known as The Hammer fraudulently added votes to Biden’s totals — but this fact didn’t stop the rally speaker from hitting a podium with her hammer and asking rally participants to shout “No King but Jesus!” anyway.
She said as follows:
‘We are going to respond to the Dominion voting machines, and the supercomputer called “The Hammer,” but we’re going to come with a different spirit today, and I’m going to hammer this podium with my hammer, and when I do, I want all of us to shout: “No King but Jesus!”
Watch footage of the cultish nonsense below:
these people are out of their damned minds pic.twitter.com/tFsAIceLhS — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) December 12, 2020
Televangelist Mark Burns also spoke at the event. While yelling, he insisted that the “Jericho walls must come down!” He (loudly) added as follows:
‘This is what I learned about witchcraft. You gotta tell a witch; you gotta look ’em right in the eye and say: I’m coming after you! This is your last day! This is your last time! Every curse you cursed against our president and against our nation is gonna double-fold back on your head!… These are our devils! And we will kill them now!’
In short, this speaker at rally proceedings that Trump himself lauded on Twitter is characterizing “devils” that must be “killed” as responsible for political developments that he doesn’t like. Check out the cultish nonsense below:
"These are our devils. And we will kill them now." — televangelist Mark Burns, having a normal one pic.twitter.com/YKHpVNvbmk — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) December 12, 2020
At one particularly laughable moment, retired General Michael Flynn’s sister appeared on stage, where she appeared to completely bungle the words of “God Bless America.” Check out the footage below:
You would think a patriot would know the first line to "God Bless America". What did she even say? Land where I sail? (Gen Flynn's sister at the Stop The Steal rally in DC) pic.twitter.com/4ef0rtW1Ae — Jared Pushner (@JaredPushner) December 12, 2020


bipartisanreport--2020-12-12--Kayleigh McEnany Has Angry Public Meltdown After SCOTUS Defeat

Trump World isn ’ t taking their recent Supreme Court loss well .
On Friday , the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a case in which Texas and its allies , including President Donald Trump ’ s own team , sought the invalidation of the presidential election results in Wisconsin , Michigan , Pennsylvania , and Georgia , all of which Biden won .
A majority of the court ’ s justices , including all three of Trump ’ s own appointees , concluded that Texas ’ s side didn ’ t have the legal standing to bring their case .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ McEnany insisted that the Supreme Court “ hid behind ” concerns related to “ procedure ” and “ dodged ” the fundamental issues — but that ’ s just not an accurate characterization .
McEnany angrily said as follows : In reality , seven justices went along with an order stating that “ Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections.
” In other words , Texas hadn ’ t successfully shown a judicially meaningful stake in the way that other states interpret @ @ @ @ @ @ @ own elections .
Texas ’ s claim that they did have a judicially meaningful stake in the conducting of elections in other states sat at the core of their argument .
Two conservative justices on the court , Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas , even more explicitly directly addressed the issues .
The justices said that they “ would… grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief , ” meaning that they ’ d hear the case but would not support invalidating the election results that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sentiments on Twitter that were similar to those that McEnany shared , complaining that the Supreme Court supposedly “ had ZERO interest in the merits of the greatest voter fraud ever perpetrated on the United States of America , ” but again , that ’ s not accurate .
Two of the court ’ s most conservative justices explicitly stated that they would not grant the relief that Texas was seeking .
That “ relief ” was the invalidation of the election outcome in four states where Biden won .

Trump World isn’t taking their recent Supreme Court loss well. On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a case in which Texas and its allies, including President Donald Trump’s own team, sought the invalidation of the presidential election results in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Georgia, all of which Biden won. A majority of the court’s justices, including all three of Trump’s own appointees, concluded that Texas’s side didn’t have the legal standing to bring their case. On Fox, top Trump staffer Kayleigh McEnany insisted that the Supreme Court “hid behind” concerns related to “procedure” and “dodged” the fundamental issues — but that’s just not an accurate characterization.
McEnany angrily said as follows:
‘There’s no way to say it other than they dodged. They dodged. They hid behind procedure, and they refused to use their authority to enforce the Constitution.’
Kayleigh on Supreme Court: Yeah there’s no way to say it other than they dodged. They dodged. They hid behind procedure and they refused to use their authority to enforce the constitution. pic.twitter.com/VLi04yIrIC — Acyn Torabi (@Acyn) December 12, 2020
In reality, seven justices went along with an order stating that “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections.” In other words, Texas hadn’t successfully shown a judicially meaningful stake in the way that other states interpret their own respective laws and conduct their own elections. Texas’s claim that they did have a judicially meaningful stake in the conducting of elections in other states sat at the core of their argument. Two conservative justices on the court, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, even more explicitly directly addressed the issues. The justices said that they “would… grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief,” meaning that they’d hear the case but would not support invalidating the election results that Texas targeted.
Donald Trump himself expressed sentiments on Twitter that were similar to those that McEnany shared, complaining that the Supreme Court supposedly “had ZERO interest in the merits of the greatest voter fraud ever perpetrated on the United States of America,” but again, that’s not accurate. Two of the court’s most conservative justices explicitly stated that they would not grant the relief that Texas was seeking. That “relief” was the invalidation of the election outcome in four states where Biden won.
The Supreme Court had ZERO interest in the merits of the greatest voter fraud ever perpetrated on the United States of America. All they were interested in is “standing”, which makes it very difficult for the President to present a case on the merits. 75,000,000 votes! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 12, 2020


bipartisanreport--2020-12-12--PA Attorney General Triumphantly Trolls Trump Over SCOTUS Loss

On Friday , the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit in which Texas and its allies — including President Donald Trump ’ s own team — sought the invalidation of the presidential election outcome in Wisconsin , Pennsylvania , Michigan , and Georgia , all of which President-elect Biden won .
Trump ’ s own three nominees were among the justices who concluded that Texas ’ s side didn ’ t even have legal standing to bring their case .
After the Supreme Court ’ s rejection , Pennsylvania state Attorney General Josh Shapiro ( D ) praised the development @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any future efforts to rollback electoral freedom .
‘ The US Supreme Court saw through this seditious abuse of the judicial process , and its swift denial should make anyone contemplating further attacks on our election think twice .
While these stunts are legally insignificant , their cost to our country — in misleading the public about a free and fair election and in tearing at our Constitution — is high and we will not tolerate them from our sister states or anyone else .
On Monday , the Electoral College will meet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will cast their votes to reflect the will of the people .
My office has successfully protected Pennsylvanians right to vote against a constant assault over the past six months , and we will continue that fight as long as necessary.
’ There is no legitimacy to the attacks from Trump and his allies against the election results , which have failed in courts across the country in front of conservative and liberal judges alike .
The Department of Homeland Security , Attorney General Bill Barr , and local election officials around the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s no legitimate evidence of election outcome-altering fraud — Trump ’ s claims otherwise are an authoritarian fever dream and an attack on the democratic process in the United States .
Over on his own Twitter page , Trump has not taken well to the rejection from the Supreme Court .
In one Saturday morning post , he insisted in all caps that he “ WON THE ELECTION IN A LANDSLIDE , ” but there ’ s no way around the fact that this claim is a delusion .
He can not bluster @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that he lost .
The electoral process in the United States does not revolve around Donald Trump , no matter if President Victim Complex behaves otherwise .

On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit in which Texas and its allies — including President Donald Trump’s own team — sought the invalidation of the presidential election outcome in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Georgia, all of which President-elect Biden won. Trump’s own three nominees were among the justices who concluded that Texas’s side didn’t even have legal standing to bring their case. After the Supreme Court’s rejection, Pennsylvania state Attorney General Josh Shapiro (D) praised the development — and pledged to continue to fight any future efforts to rollback electoral freedom.
Shapiro commented as follows:
‘The US Supreme Court saw through this seditious abuse of the judicial process, and its swift denial should make anyone contemplating further attacks on our election think twice. While these stunts are legally insignificant, their cost to our country — in misleading the public about a free and fair election and in tearing at our Constitution — is high and we will not tolerate them from our sister states or anyone else. On Monday, the Electoral College will meet, and Pennsylvania’s 20 Electors will cast their votes to reflect the will of the people. My office has successfully protected Pennsylvanians right to vote against a constant assault over the past six months, and we will continue that fight as long as necessary.’
Read Shapiro’s statement below:
Pennsylvania AG @JoshShapiroPA on the ruling: “The US Supreme Court saw through this seditious abuse of the judicial process, and its swift denial should make anyone contemplating further attacks on our election think twice." pic.twitter.com/Uc0TfUtEr7 — Adam Klasfeld (@KlasfeldReports) December 11, 2020
There is no legitimacy to the attacks from Trump and his allies against the election results, which have failed in courts across the country in front of conservative and liberal judges alike. The Department of Homeland Security, Attorney General Bill Barr, and local election officials around the country have all confirmed that there’s no legitimate evidence of election outcome-altering fraud — Trump’s claims otherwise are an authoritarian fever dream and an attack on the democratic process in the United States.
Over on his own Twitter page, Trump has not taken well to the rejection from the Supreme Court. In one Saturday morning post, he insisted in all caps that he “WON THE ELECTION IN A LANDSLIDE,” but there’s no way around the fact that this claim is a delusion. He can not bluster his way out of the basic reality that he lost. The electoral process in the United States does not revolve around Donald Trump, no matter if President Victim Complex behaves otherwise.
I WON THE ELECTION IN A LANDSLIDE, but remember, I only think in terms of legal votes, not all of the fake voters and fraud that miraculously floated in from everywhere! What a disgrace! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 12, 2020


bipartisanreport--2020-12-12--Twitter Takes Post SCOTUS Ruling Action Against Trump’s Account

Twitter appears to have at least temporarily suspended likes and retweets on at least one of President Donald Trump ’ s Twitter posts on Saturday morning .
They ’ ve taken similar action in the past in an attempt to cut down on the reach that some of Trump ’ s election lies have gotten .
The latest action from the platform came amidst a flurry of additional angry election-related lies from the president , who was melting down after the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a case in which Texas and its allies , including Trump ’ s own team @ @ @ @ @ @ @ presidential election outcome in Wisconsin , Michigan , Pennsylvania , and Georgia .
Check out screenshots of what happened below : In the post that Twitter took action against , Trump characterized the Supreme Court rejection as “ a great and disgraceful miscarriage of justice , ” claiming that “ The people of the United States were cheated , and our Country disgraced.
” His side was “ Never even given our day in Court !
” he angrily added , although that ’ s simply not correct .
The Supreme Court itself @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its allies presented , and most of the Justices , including Trump ’ s own three nominees , concluded that Texas ’ s side didn ’ t even have the legal standing to bring the case .
Elsewhere in the country , conservative and liberal judges alike have heard out the Trump team ’ s claims about supposed widespread election fraud — and they ’ ve rejected these claims , over and over .
In a particularly unhinged Saturday morning Twitter post after the Supreme Court rejection , Trump insisted as follows : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Department of Homeland Security has confirmed that there ’ s no legitimate evidence that voting systems were compromised — would he suggest that DHS is in on the imaginary fraud as well ?
They ’ re not , obviously ; rather , Trump is thoroughly disconnected from the truth and reality of the situation .

Twitter appears to have at least temporarily suspended likes and retweets on at least one of President Donald Trump’s Twitter posts on Saturday morning. They’ve taken similar action in the past in an attempt to cut down on the reach that some of Trump’s election lies have gotten. The latest action from the platform came amidst a flurry of additional angry election-related lies from the president, who was melting down after the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a case in which Texas and its allies, including Trump’s own team, were seeking the invalidation of the presidential election outcome in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Georgia.
Check out screenshots of what happened below:
He's on top-secret double-probation now from Twitter. No likes or RTs on his disinformation. I like it. But it's SO obvious that they should remove him from the service asap. He's got no public interest in being here. pic.twitter.com/28OyXmm8fw — Grant Stern (@grantstern) December 12, 2020
In the post that Twitter took action against, Trump characterized the Supreme Court rejection as “a great and disgraceful miscarriage of justice,” claiming that “The people of the United States were cheated, and our Country disgraced.” His side was “Never even given our day in Court!” he angrily added, although that’s simply not correct. The Supreme Court itself did consider the arguments that Texas and its allies presented, and most of the Justices, including Trump’s own three nominees, concluded that Texas’s side didn’t even have the legal standing to bring the case. Elsewhere in the country, conservative and liberal judges alike have heard out the Trump team’s claims about supposed widespread election fraud — and they’ve rejected these claims, over and over.
In a particularly unhinged Saturday morning Twitter post after the Supreme Court rejection, Trump insisted as follows:
‘I WON THE ELECTION IN A LANDSLIDE, but remember, I only think in terms of legal votes, not all of the fake voters and fraud that miraculously floated in from everywhere! What a disgrace!’
I WON THE ELECTION IN A LANDSLIDE, but remember, I only think in terms of legal votes, not all of the fake voters and fraud that miraculously floated in from everywhere! What a disgrace! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 12, 2020
Trump is unequivocally entirely incorrect. The Department of Homeland Security has confirmed that there’s no legitimate evidence that voting systems were compromised — would he suggest that DHS is in on the imaginary fraud as well? They’re not, obviously; rather, Trump is thoroughly disconnected from the truth and reality of the situation.


bipartisanreport--2020-12-12--Trump Declares Victory & Announce Biden Conspiracy During Saturday Meltdown

On Friday , the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a court challenge in which Texas — and allies , including President Donald Trump ’ s own legal team — sought the invalidation of the presidential election outcome in Wisconsin , Pennsylvania , Michigan , and Georgia .
Trump… isn ’ t taking the rejection well , to say the least .
On Twitter after the court ’ s decision , President Victim Complex complained that the court supposedly had “ No Wisdom , No Courage !
” Most of the justices — including Trump ’ s own three nominees — concluded @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t even have legal standing to bring their case before the court .
Trump ’ s embarrassing meltdown stretched on and on , across a total of at least 20 tweets and retweets that he posted from just before 00:00 Saturday onward .
At one point , he characterized the court ’ s decision as “ a legal disgrace , an embarrassment to the USA !
!
!
” In another post , he claimed that the “ people of the United States were cheated , and our Country disgraced.
” In a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump belted out the following nonsense : Trump ’ s comments are simply not accurate — to say the least , and his petulant insistence that he won is pathetic .
There is no legitimate evidence that he won the election .
He ’ s acting like a losing football team who ’ s refusing to leave the field and instead stomping their feet and calling on their supporters to join them in a night-long protest .
No “ fake voters and fraud… miraculously floated in from everywhere.
” Trump ’ s mish-mash @ @ @ @ @ @ @ actual legitimate evidence .
Conservative and liberal judges alike have outright rejected Trump ’ s claims about the election in courts across the country .
Would Trump suggest that these judges are in on the imaginary plot too ?
Would Trump suggest that his own Supreme Court nominees are in on the imaginary fraud ?
In yet another post , Trump claimed that Republican Governors Doug Ducey and Brian Kemp , who lead Arizona and Georgia , respectively , “ allowed states that I won easily to be stolen , ” which simply @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the least .
Read some of Trump ’ s posts below — he capped off some of his messaging by screaming : “ WE HAVE JUST BEGUN TO FIGHT !
!
!
” Trump also complained about Attorney General Bill Barr ’ s apparent knowledge of a Hunter Biden tax probe before the election .
Hunter Biden was not running for president — obviously — and his tax issues , on a basic level , have nothing whatsoever innately to do with his father , Joe Biden .
Trump claimed that his team @ @ @ @ @ @ @ treason & more ( the hard part ) , ” which is just far-right fantasy-talk .
The Obama administration did not spy on the Trump campaign .
Trump sounds like a wannabe dictator concocting ways to jail his political opponents .
Check out Twitter ’ s response to Trump below :

On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a court challenge in which Texas — and allies, including President Donald Trump’s own legal team — sought the invalidation of the presidential election outcome in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Georgia. Trump… isn’t taking the rejection well, to say the least. On Twitter after the court’s decision, President Victim Complex complained that the court supposedly had “No Wisdom, No Courage!” Most of the justices — including Trump’s own three nominees — concluded that Texas’s side didn’t even have legal standing to bring their case before the court.
The Supreme Court really let us down. No Wisdom, No Courage! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 12, 2020
Trump’s embarrassing meltdown stretched on and on, across a total of at least 20 tweets and retweets that he posted from just before 00:00 Saturday onward. At one point, he characterized the court’s decision as “a legal disgrace, an embarrassment to the USA!!!” In another post, he claimed that the “people of the United States were cheated, and our Country disgraced.” In a particularly unhinged post from Saturday morning, Trump belted out the following nonsense:
‘I WON THE ELECTION IN A LANDSLIDE, but remember, I only think in terms of legal votes, not all of the fake voters and fraud that miraculously floated in from everywhere! What a disgrace!’
Trump’s comments are simply not accurate — to say the least, and his petulant insistence that he won is pathetic. There is no legitimate evidence that he won the election. He’s acting like a losing football team who’s refusing to leave the field and instead stomping their feet and calling on their supporters to join them in a night-long protest. No “fake voters and fraud… miraculously floated in from everywhere.” Trump’s mish-mash of ignorance and lies does not equal actual legitimate evidence. Conservative and liberal judges alike have outright rejected Trump’s claims about the election in courts across the country. Would Trump suggest that these judges are in on the imaginary plot too? Would Trump suggest that his own Supreme Court nominees are in on the imaginary fraud?
In yet another post, Trump claimed that Republican Governors Doug Ducey and Brian Kemp, who lead Arizona and Georgia, respectively, “allowed states that I won easily to be stolen,” which simply isn’t true — to say the least. Read some of Trump’s posts below — he capped off some of his messaging by screaming: “WE HAVE JUST BEGUN TO FIGHT!!!”
….that, after careful study and consideration, think you got “screwed”, something which will hurt them also. Many others likewise join the suit but, within a flash, it is thrown out and gone, without even looking at the many reasons it was brought. A Rigged Election, fight on! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 12, 2020
“We’ve not gotten any court to judge this (the vote) on its merit.” @DanPatrick of Texas. It is a legal disgrace, an embarrassment to the USA!!! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 12, 2020
“Justices Alito and Thomas say they would have allowed Texas to proceed with its election lawsuit.” @seanhannity This is a great and disgraceful miscarriage of justice. The people of the United States were cheated, and our Country disgraced. Never even given our day in Court! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 12, 2020
I WON THE ELECTION IN A LANDSLIDE, but remember, I only think in terms of legal votes, not all of the fake voters and fraud that miraculously floated in from everywhere! What a disgrace! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 12, 2020
Who is a worse governor, @BrianKempGA of Georgia or @dougducey of Arizona??? These are two RINO Republicans who fought against me and the Republican Party harder than any Democrat. They allowed states that I won easily to be stolen. Never forget, vote them out of office! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 12, 2020
WE HAVE JUST BEGUN TO FIGHT!!! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 12, 2020
Trump also complained about Attorney General Bill Barr’s apparent knowledge of a Hunter Biden tax probe before the election. Hunter Biden was not running for president — obviously — and his tax issues, on a basic level, have nothing whatsoever innately to do with his father, Joe Biden. Trump claimed that his team “caught them cold, spying, treason & more (the hard part),” which is just far-right fantasy-talk. The Obama administration did not spy on the Trump campaign. Trump sounds like a wannabe dictator concocting ways to jail his political opponents.
IF Biden gets in, nothing will happen to Hunter or Joe. Barr will do nothing, and the new group of partisan killers coming in will quickly kill it all. Same thing with Durham. We caught them cold, spying, treason & more (the hard part), but “Justice” took too long. Will be DOA! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 12, 2020
Why didn’t Bill Barr reveal the truth to the public, before the Election, about Hunter Biden. Joe was lying on the debate stage that nothing was wrong, or going on – Press confirmed. Big disadvantage for Republicans at the polls! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 12, 2020
Check out Twitter’s response to Trump below:


bipartisanreport--2020-12-12--‘The Lincoln Project’ Terrifies Georgia GOP With New Video Release

On December 2 , after more than 260,000 American lives had been lost to COVID-19 , with an upsurge in cases promising a long and dark winter with more deaths ahead , Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell ( R-KY ) shed tears on the floor of the Senate .
Those tears weren ’ t for the many Americans who have lost loved ones or the millions of Americans living in poverty because of the virus .
In fact , he hasn ’ t shed a tear about that at all .
McConnell teared up during a farewell speech to Senator @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hasn ’ t appeared to be concerned about the aftermath of the first wave of COVID nor the second that is surging today .
In fact , he ’ s held up a stimulus package meant to rescue Americans facing homelessness and abject poverty because of shuttered businesses and fear of the virus in homes with elderly or ill members .
His biggest stonewall in the debate over a second stimulus bill has been a provision barring Americans from suing their employers if they do not follow CDC guidelines to protect their workers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of course , supports this provision .
When Georgians vote in the special election in January – Republican Kelly Loeffler vs. Democrat Rev .
Raphael Warnock and Republican David Perdue vs. Democrat Jon Ossoff – they are not just voting for those candidates .
They ’ re also voting whether or not to keep Mitch McConnell in his position as senate majority leader and self-proclaimed “ grim reaper ” of policies that help anyone other than the wealthy .
Twitter was in full support of the new ad by The Lincoln Project , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Read some of their comments below :

On December 2, after more than 260,000 American lives had been lost to COVID-19, with an upsurge in cases promising a long and dark winter with more deaths ahead, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) shed tears on the floor of the Senate. Those tears weren’t for the many Americans who have lost loved ones or the millions of Americans living in poverty because of the virus. In fact, he hasn’t shed a tear about that at all.
.@senatemajldr Mitch McConnell is crying, but not Georgians. Check out our latest, up now. #gasen pic.twitter.com/8afvtv0v8l — The Lincoln Project (@ProjectLincoln) December 11, 2020
McConnell teared up during a farewell speech to Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN), but hasn’t appeared to be concerned about the aftermath of the first wave of COVID nor the second that is surging today. In fact, he’s held up a stimulus package meant to rescue Americans facing homelessness and abject poverty because of shuttered businesses and fear of the virus in homes with elderly or ill members. His biggest stonewall in the debate over a second stimulus bill has been a provision barring Americans from suing their employers if they do not follow CDC guidelines to protect their workers from getting the virus. Mitch, of course, supports this provision.
When Georgians vote in the special election in January – Republican Kelly Loeffler vs. Democrat Rev. Raphael Warnock and Republican David Perdue vs. Democrat Jon Ossoff – they are not just voting for those candidates. They’re also voting whether or not to keep Mitch McConnell in his position as senate majority leader and self-proclaimed “grim reaper” of policies that help anyone other than the wealthy.
Twitter was in full support of the new ad by The Lincoln Project, a group of former Republican political strategists. Read some of their comments below:


bipartisanreport--2020-12-12--Wisconsin Federal Court Hits Trump Again With 58th Court Defeat


bipartisanreport--2020-12-12--Kayleigh McEnany Embarrasses Herself Responding To SCOTUS Loss


bipartisanreport--2020-12-12--Pennsylvania AG Talks Trash To Trump Over SCOTUS Loss


bipartisanreport--2020-12-12--‘The Lincoln Project’ Strikes Again With Video To Flip The Senate Blue


bipartisanreport--2020-12-14--Trump Accuses Election Officials Of Crimes During Evening Freak-Out

Outgoing President Donald Trump is continuing to push his unhinged lies about the election , which he decisively lost to President-elect Joe Biden .
On Sunday , he posted a slew of rhetoric on Twitter , including the disturbingly unhinged claim that local election officials who ’ ve signed on to certifications of the presidential election results have committed a “ severely punishable crime ” because of their supposed complicity in imaginary fraud… or something .
Although Trump didn ’ t exactly levelheadedly explain himself — obviously — he nevertheless explicitly pushed for dishing out severe punishment of an unexplained @ @ @ @ @ @ @ call this rhetoric grossly anti-democratic and against the fundamental ethos of the United States of America would be an understatement .
Trump tweeted , in part , as follows : ‘ Swing States that have found massive VOTER FRAUD , which is all of them , CAN NOT LEGALLY CERTIFY these votes as complete & correct without committing a severely punishable crime… In all Swing State cases , there are far more votes than are necessary to win the State , and the Election itself .
Therefore , VOTES CAN NOT BE CERTIFIED @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ On Sunday , Trump also complained on Twitter about local Republican leaders supposedly “ allowing the Democrats to so blatantly cheat in their attempt to steal the election , which we won overwhelmingly , ” which is just unhinged .
He ’ s not going to change the reality of the situation by posting any number of angry tweets .
The Department of Homeland Security , Attorney General Bill Barr , and local election officials around the country have all confirmed that there ’ s no legitimate evidence of election outcome-altering fraud @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election results , and the electoral college is meeting on Monday .
Are all of those involved in this process in on the ( imaginary ) election fraud ?
Obviously not , although accomplishing the fraud that Trump delusionally imagines took place would likely require the cooperation of thousands of people across the country .
On Sunday , Trump also complained yet again about the U.S. Supreme Court ’ s recent rejection of a case that he supported in which plaintiffs sought the invalidation of the election outcome in four swing states that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ court “ chickened out , ” which is simply a gross mischaracterization of the situation .
Even the two justices who said that they ’ d have heard the case said that they wouldn ’ t have granted the relief that plaintiffs were seeking , meaning the invalidation of the election outcome in those states .
Not a single justice indicated that they would have granted the plaintiffs ’ demands .

Outgoing President Donald Trump is continuing to push his unhinged lies about the election, which he decisively lost to President-elect Joe Biden. On Sunday, he posted a slew of rhetoric on Twitter, including the disturbingly unhinged claim that local election officials who’ve signed on to certifications of the presidential election results have committed a “severely punishable crime” because of their supposed complicity in imaginary fraud… or something. Although Trump didn’t exactly levelheadedly explain himself — obviously — he nevertheless explicitly pushed for dishing out severe punishment of an unexplained variety to local election officials. To call this rhetoric grossly anti-democratic and against the fundamental ethos of the United States of America would be an understatement.
Trump tweeted, in part, as follows:
‘Swing States that have found massive VOTER FRAUD, which is all of them, CANNOT LEGALLY CERTIFY these votes as complete & correct without committing a severely punishable crime… In all Swing State cases, there are far more votes than are necessary to win the State, and the Election itself. Therefore, VOTES CANNOT BE CERTIFIED. THIS ELECTION IS UNDER PROTEST!’
On Sunday, Trump also complained on Twitter about local Republican leaders supposedly “allowing the Democrats to so blatantly cheat in their attempt to steal the election, which we won overwhelmingly,” which is just unhinged. He’s not going to change the reality of the situation by posting any number of angry tweets. The Department of Homeland Security, Attorney General Bill Barr, and local election officials around the country have all confirmed that there’s no legitimate evidence of election outcome-altering fraud. Every single state has certified its election results, and the electoral college is meeting on Monday. Are all of those involved in this process in on the (imaginary) election fraud? Obviously not, although accomplishing the fraud that Trump delusionally imagines took place would likely require the cooperation of thousands of people across the country.
…Tens of millions of haphazardly ballots sent, with some people getting two, three, or four ballots. We will never give up! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 13, 2020
On Sunday, Trump also complained yet again about the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent rejection of a case that he supported in which plaintiffs sought the invalidation of the election outcome in four swing states that Biden won. Trump insisted that the court “chickened out,” which is simply a gross mischaracterization of the situation. Even the two justices who said that they’d have heard the case said that they wouldn’t have granted the relief that plaintiffs were seeking, meaning the invalidation of the election outcome in those states. Not a single justice indicated that they would have granted the plaintiffs’ demands.
…They just “chickened out” and didn’t want to rule on the merits of the case. So bad for our Country! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 13, 2020
Check out Twitter’s response below:


bipartisanreport--2020-12-14--Obama Tweets Sunday Leadership Message As Trump Rages Online

One man is refusing to provide emergency food , shelter , and money to Americans all over the country sitting in miles-long food lines .
This is not through any fault of their own , but as a direct result of the coronavirus pandemic .
How did the self-described Mitch Grim Reaper McConnell , or as his friends call him Grim .
do that ?
All the Senate leader has to do is let one bill through from the House of Representatives .
He said no .
President Barack Obama said watch me .
McConnell is the guy whose Chinese @ @ @ @ @ @ @ million when he married the daughter , Secretary of Transportation Elaine Lan Chao .
President Obama pointed out that if the Democrats take both Georgia seats , it will blow open the bottleneck called the Moscow Mitch McConnell .
Did we mention that the senator has an aluminum plant in his state ’ s back yard paid for by one of Russian President Vladimir Putin ’ s best oligarch buddies ?
One state election can change the whole future of America , and President Barak Obama has been volunteering his name and time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ power .
The election in Georgia is not just a state election , no , it is an American election where every Democrat , every Independent , and every disillusioned Republican can take part : The race is between two Americans committed to helping the people of Georgia and two sitting Republicans committed to their own wealth .
The choice should be simple .
Anyone who wants to help Obama can volunteer their times , their money , or both .
Check out what President Obama has to say about it : Twitter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Obama ’ s tweet .
Take a look at some of our favorites responses below : The Mueller Report Adventures : In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page .
These quick , two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people .
Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery .
Interestingly enough , Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order .

One man is refusing to provide emergency food, shelter, and money to Americans all over the country sitting in miles-long food lines. This is not through any fault of their own, but as a direct result of the coronavirus pandemic. How did the self-described Mitch Grim Reaper McConnell, or as his friends call him Grim. do that? All the Senate leader has to do is let one bill through from the House of Representatives. He said no. President Barack Obama said watch me.
McConnell is the guy whose Chinese magnate shipping father-in-law gave him $59 million when he married the daughter, Secretary of Transportation Elaine Lan Chao.
President Obama pointed out that if the Democrats take both Georgia seats, it will blow open the bottleneck called the Moscow Mitch McConnell. Did we mention that the senator has an aluminum plant in his state’s back yard paid for by one of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s best oligarch buddies?
One state election can change the whole future of America, and President Barak Obama has been volunteering his name and time to preventing Grim from keeping all that power. The election in Georgia is not just a state election, no, it is an American election where every Democrat, every Independent, and every disillusioned Republican can take part:
‘Georgia’s runoff election will determine whether the American people have a Senate that’s actually fighting for them. You can get involved right now—make calls, chip in, and do whatever you can to help elect @ReverendWarnock and@Ossoff:’
The race is between two Americans committed to helping the people of Georgia and two sitting Republicans committed to their own wealth. The choice should be simple. Anyone who wants to help Obama can volunteer their times, their money, or both. Check out what President Obama has to say about it:
‘Here’s a great way to call voters in Georgia and help them get ready to vote. A couple hours this weekend could help Democrats win the Senate.’
Twitter world went wild when they saw President Obama’s tweet. Take a look at some of our favorites responses below:
“Trump did us a favor by exposing these elected officials. They are definitionally people who signed on to a desperate desire to subvert the will of the American people, to disenfranchise voters in GA, PA, WI, and MI based on lies and conspiracy theories.” pic.twitter.com/3xMXGMEEIG — ًً (@someknew) December 13, 2020
The Mueller Report Adventures: In Bite-Sizes on this Facebook page. These quick, two-minute reads interpret the report in normal English for busy people. Mueller Bite-Sizes uncovers what is essentially a compelling spy mystery. Interestingly enough, Mueller Bite-Sizes can be read in any order.